20010404_APPLICATION R-210 VASS BYPASS_20100726

,.*
Ic
O
CAF;
micnaei r. tasiey, uovernor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 19, 2002
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT Planning and Environmental Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Re: Water Quality Certification Pursuant to §401 of the Federal Clean
Water Act, US 1 from north of Lakeview to south of Sanford
(Vass Bypass), Moore/Lee Counties
TIP No. R-210
DWQ Project No. 010404
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
44"'-94tk
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Richard Spencer, USACE Wilmington Field Office
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
Public Hearing Attendees
Central Files
File Copy
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3344 issued to The North Carolina Department of
Transportation dated July 19, 2002..

North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NO. 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
'.&I' .J
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. This certification authorizes the NCDOT to incur the
following permanent impacts: 41.5 acres of jurisdictional wetlands through permanent fill, excavation,
and mechanized clearing; 14.50 acres of surface waters (anthropogenically-created ponds) fill; and 4,880
linear feet of stream channels in Moore and Lee Counties, as described in the Application dated 19
February 2001, and additional information dated 12 February 2002 and 15 March 2002. The project shall
be constructed pursuant to the application dated February 19 filed to construct improvements to US 1
from north of Lakeview to south of Sanford (Vass Bypass, TIP Project No. R-210).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of the state
with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and
discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application. Should
your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ in writing; and you may be required to submit a
new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If this project incurs
additional wetland or stream impacts, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with
all the conditions listed below. In addition, you should obtain all other federal, state or local permits
before proceeding with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-
discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations. This Certification shall expire three (3) years from
the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the expiration date of the corresponding
Corps of Engineers Permit, whichever is sooner.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. The applicant must follow the appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or
exceed those outlined in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual or the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual, whichever is more
appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR Regional or Central
Offices) and shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design,.
installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to assure
compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams
and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater
classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
2. NCDOT shall use Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters (NCDOT March.
1997), specifically using all applicable preventive and control measures during the design,
construction and maintenance of this project. These measures shall be implemented prior to any
ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to downstream aquatic resources.

3. During the construction of the project, the applicant shall strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations
entitled, Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds [15A NCAC 4B .0124(a)-(d)], within the entire
project corridor.
4. Storm water shall be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and shall not be routed directly into
streams. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water diffuse
flow.
5. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on all bare soil within 10 days of
ground-disturbing activities (due to the presence of High Quality Waters) to provide long term
erosion control.
6. NCDOT shall adhere to the requirements for High Quality Waters [15A NCAC 2B.0224].
7. Hazardous Spill Catch Basins shall be required for all stream crossings. The final designs for the
Hazardous Spill Catch Basins shall be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401
Wetlands Unit prior to beginning construction in the Water Supply watershed. As-built drawings for
the basins shall be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401 Wetlands Units no
later than 30 days after the construction is completed.
8. The bridge(s) required for this project shall be designed according to Best Management Practices for
the Protection of Surface Waters (NCDOT March 1997). Specifically, the bridge decking shall not
discharge storm water directly into the receiving water.
9. Prior to any construction activities, the NCDOT shall submit a maintenance plan for alt storm water
management facilities and hazardous spill catch basins associated with the project.. The NCDOT shall
be required to implement the maintenance plan for the life of this road. Sediment and erosion control
devices shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of
sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed
and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
10. Any bridge demolition work required by this project shall adhere to NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal.
11. Live or fresh concrete shall not come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has
hardened.
12. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated
with this permit without appropriate modification of this Certification. If this occurs, compensatory
mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
13. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below the
elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water.and aquatic life unless it can be shown
to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical. Design and placement of culverts and other
structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may
result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down
stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall
be maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
14. NCDOT shall mitigate for the loss of two water supply wells for the Town of. Cameron by
constructing a municipal supply well or wells capable of yielding a minimum of 70 gallons per

minute (gpm). The Utility Relocation Agreement was entered with the Town of Cameron on October
26, 1998.
15. Mitigation: Compensatory mitigation shall be the same as that approved by the US Army Corps of
Engineers as long as the mitigation required equals a ratio of 1:1 restoration or creation of lost
wetland acres as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(6). A report must be submitted to the NC
Division of Water Quality that describes the final approved wetland and stream mitigation for this
project within two (2) months of the issuance of the 404 permit issued by the Army Corps of
Engineers.
a. Wetland impacts of 41.5 acres include riverine wetlands. NCDOT will mitigate these impacts by
providing the following:
¦ 4.8 acres of on-site restoration (1:1 ratio) in the floodplain of the Little River as described in
Appendix C of the Application.
The monitoring plan shall be followed and reports shall be submitted to this Office after the
first year and every other year afterwards for a total of five (5) years.
¦ 8.4 acres of on-site preservation as described in Appendix C of the Application.
Sandhills Area Land Trust (SALT) Mitigation Site .(a 327-acre site in Moore County) being
offered in total to offset the remainder of wetland impacts (36.8 acres) associated with the
project. This site includes a maximum of 49 acres of wetland restoration.
NCDOT shall place groundwater gauges on the site such that they will accurately measure
the drainage effect of the existing ditches at the SALT site. Before the additional monitoring
and.re-modeling of the groundwater table of the SALT Site occurs, NCDOT shall meet Vith
DWQ personnel to agree upon the details of additional studies. If the resulting hydrological
modeling demonstrates that less than 36.8 acres can actually be restored, NCDOTT shall obtain
wetland mitigation through in-lieu payments to Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP).
b. Stream impacts total 4,880 linear feet in the Cape Fear River Basin (Hydrologic Unit 03030004).
NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio except where on-site
mitigation will be provided. The on-site mitigation sites will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio as
detailed in Table 4, Appendix A of the February 19, 2001 Application. Compensatory mitigation
consists of the following:
¦ 1,154 linear feet of on-site stream relocation/restoration, with 50-foot buffers, using natural
channel design. The natural channel design specifications shall be calculated from field
measurements of an unimpacted section of stream (reference reach). The plans must include
reference reach data including a sketch map, the range of values (pattern data), and all
calculations (including the determination of bankfull). The channel design should include a
floodplain terrace at stream bankfull.
The stream relocation shall be built and maintained according to approved plans before any
mitigation credit is given. If this Office determines that the stream restoration or associated
riparian area has become unstable, the stream shall be repaired or stabilized using only
natural channel design techniques if possible. Additionally, the vegetation in the riparian
shall be maintained and/or replaced according to the approved plans. Rip-rap and other hard
structures may only be used if required by the Division of Land Resources or a Delegated
Local Program. Additionally, all repair designs must be submitted to and receive written
approval from this Office before the repair work is performed.

Since the restored stream is proposed as compensatory mitigation for stream impacts, the
restored portion and associated riparian area shall be preserved in perpetuity through a
preservation easement or some other legally binding mechanism or agreement. The above
easement or other legally binding mechanism or agreement must be in place before any
mitigation credit shall be given. Additionally, the stream physical and biological monitoring
plan shall be followed and reports shall be submitted to this Office after the first year and
every other year afterwards for a total of five (5) years.
¦ The remaining 8,068 linear feet of stream mitigation shall be provided via in-lieu payments to
Wetlands Restoration Program as agreed on April 1, 1999.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0500, this contribution will satisfy our'compensatory
mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h). Until plans are received and approved
for the stream relocation using natural channel'design, wetland or stream fill shall not occur.
16. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible parry shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands
Unit of the Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
17. The Applicant shall require its contractors (and/or agents) to comply with all of the terms of this
Certification, and shall provide each of its contractors (and/or agents) a copy of this Certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result
in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions: are made conditions of the Federal Permit-
If If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for.a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B. of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This the 19th day of July 2002
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Att" vfu?x
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
WQC No. 3344
f
Certificate of Completion
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
County:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or
the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the approved
plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the approved
plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of
the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Registration No.
Date

V? •!LT-
l5~11L
USS• 1y-

TABLE 4. US 1 Relocation - Stream
Site Water Body
Section A
, UT to Little River
1
5 UT to Little River
1
0 UT to Little River
,12 UT to Crane Creek
13 UT to Crane Creek
14 UT to Crane Creek
15 UT to Crane Creek
16 UT to Crane Creek
17 UT to Crane Creek/Farm Pond
19 UT to Crane Creek
21 UT to Crane Creek
.22 UT to Crane Creek
24 Farm Pond
SUBTOTAL
Channel Channel Proposed Acres
Impact Replaced Mitigation* Impacted
inear feet) (linear feet) (linear feet)
341 0 682 0
7 0 14 0
574. 174 574 0
13 0 276 0
26 0 52 0
39 0 78 0
256 0 512 0
600 0 1200 0
223 0 446 5.83
259 0 518 0
223 0 446 0
43 0 86 0
0 0 0 1.12
2729 174
Section B 4884 6.95
1 Farm Pond 0 0

2
Farm Pond
0
0 0 1.31

4
Farm Pond
0
0 0 0.91

5
Farm Pond
0
0 0 0.12

- 6
Nancy Dyer Branch
213
0 0 1.09

-9
UT to Little Crane Creek
167
0 426 0

12
Farm Pond
0
0 334 0

14
Farm Pond
0
0 0 0.09

15
Farm Pond
0
0 0 1.57

SUBTOTAL
380
0 0
760 1.59
6
68
Secti on C .
3 Farm Pond/ 282 0 564 0
20
UT to Little Crane Creek .
4 UT to Little Crane Creek 472 449 472 0
5 UT to Little Crane Creek 646 531 646

-6
UT to Little Crane Creek
276
0
552 0

9
Farm Pond
0
0
0 0

10
Little Juniper Creek
39
0 0.67

UT to-Little Juniper Creek
56 -
0 78
112- - 0

_
-
SUBTOTAL 1771 980 2424 0
0.87
TOTALS x4880 - j 1154 8068 X14.50 4
- A 2:1 multiplier was applied to each impact site, except for those with on-site relocations
SITE MAP
SCSI L E
U SGT /o[!?M
/ : 2s; aeo
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302
R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Z OF ?R NOVEMEBER 1997
r
)erdel y t - O Rockhs
Raeford 4 /tea 0
y 1 Carbontor?? - ' 2 *' Nortn?v-rew 42 9
arove
wnnot 42 - 1!42 421 COTOn 6alybeate Springs
3 i S'anford > 8 ngier `
S Westmoore \ High alh . CI i ,:? ,V 1 tic x,..- x,rk Krplm; 21
Broadway s Al 8
705 7 yco,?. Tramway 7? 5
a WR Rob s re; :L1 cp Buies
`L E , v! E 87 / ` Creek 4 Coats
Spies arkwood ~c ;! Mamers
3 Lemon Ldlington ?C - X27
4r ril 72 Springs
5 Swann H A R T Ben
0 O R', SS a J
9 +Carthag! Olivia
i 705 2 Nzron a 2 ' Erwl , -
Hill Crest 1 > i Pineview DUO 9
Samarcand Whispering 2 18 Bunnlevel
! 3
Ea¢I 22 mes / 10 210 4 17
?1 211 Seven Lakes ? Johns ville Spout Springs 82
i. Springs Eastwood ass 3
rt+ery West 13 8 *
End Eakeview - 1 _ 2 Unde ?; «?i
4 6 74 4 i ~? R'` r 17 ! ss Godw n
7J 7ackso "C" • 2 Manly Manchester Falcon
Springs ?t 1 t i • s ,t, 1? ?' • ^? Waae 4 82
m Pinehurst s Sout n "P • +ia xr 13
4 Sprin Lake
73 5 rmoNh Wood, Srvp - C U M• 6 ?7 R' L A N 1 7
'O FOR7 ARwGG MIWARY RESFaV'AnONV '
5 vdlai5e P,nebbuffe? 711 - - - ? . 4:87 ;? rya
,A Fayet?enfi 5 S
1 3 shleY Heights. .f-
6 = Mc in H ' 0-2 K E
M 0 N D S+
G I > Montrose .- •r ?. 4 3 S
i11. andere Autrvvi
SondhJh R«. Aroc Oftigan . q?EE4 7 i3 TJ 1 m rl e _nd Y r_
sLe _a
Marston 1 •74 O. Timberland 7 ?'9•?`
.1
V/y
131 -
f
i
19 ?
19•.r
' 94eaaro
t O f 2 3 4 MILES
Mill
SGA1-E
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 20 30
0 10 20 30 .._?40-- 48
Scale of Kilometers

99.,
` .'193
aoi, 194
lob.i?a
N.3 1.
791
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET I OF S' NOVEMEBER 1997
ClNIT Y' MAP
1
_ •1

S
Z ?
i
c

Q: ,? col
- ? 1
gyp- / ?
SITE MAP
SCALE
U $b?+ /D40pn
W%%
/ : 2 5 000
Q
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NCRTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF L49 NOVEMEBER 1997
=23.02-9 -Y6-REV
IEGIN PROP. C/A
3EGIN PROP. FENCE i
t 000 (L'?)
? ??` }.,. SIB IoN N NoROI ` P //
i
ROP ? _ ? ?

O ?? 51.
ITCH CAT-1
Z 4.5 4.5
.ol 4b.
Lc

.027
,040 RT.
.048
+00.135
-Y6-REV
49.536

F.
+ 25.(
END F
END F
23.0
6
'? \ F?Of P°?rH NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF.
s TRANSPORTATION
O\ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
\ \\? PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 8
pFTvk?Na ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
r MOORE / LEE COUNTY
- PROJECT 8.T560302
f US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEV?
F\ to North of SR 1825, R=210 A
F` SHEET i+ OF 6

b

»wos
m

\ '' u
V
+45.838
v 45.000 (LT) f
(14
/
7.64) 3E
,
*
M
3E at C ?
PR P. P A
T
a

LT. 4. T N
A 4803E
T?
T
ER FABRIC \
BERM G
T 1.
U
TER
N: TRAF. RG. w/ 6 m F
w
Q
sk
o -

O
O
o

0
W
Z

p i
p
E Q
M ART CNTR CT
Y ,p ?-
/
N W L
3E ITYP.)

+45.838
45 `
i
.000 (RTR7) ) ®
4x.64•)

SCALE
1T . 4?3 o a ?>„
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
B.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
_
n G o <? n n I>1`• IO 11^C) hll?. IhUTACT IN Wt:l'LAND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
A e < n ?` OUGTO 1\11:01AN1CALCLUMUNO OF SR 1825.
LL•'YOND CONSII:UCTION LL\IPCS
SCALE AS SHOWN
DeN,7TCS FILL IN WETLA-40 OF- +
SHEET NOVEMEBER 1997
r
a.1
O

M / /

M / 1 \ p
-L- ST 34+26.302 T

N
I ?y
+26
U +41 .302 -L-

?
5
' .302
45.000 (Li)
.000 Ct7)?
v 147:64')
m PROP . R/W (CHORD) C
A
x ? ? J o
AT. 'y, (43 ,, '610
N 2L SEE DITCH DETA
I SEE PROFILE
LTER 2 FABRIC IL A'8' `•:/ AFL Np C
C
37 J

{
J
,m; o .?
5
R
2G '6
CP Q
F a

' /
/ O U N
W 3
-L- US I OE7 FLLI EISU "' " pa Z
z

?
Qo
2GI°, _
J ?y5 ~

v -_ G .O
_ a.
?
r Q

K- SEE DITCH DETAIL PN

C
PROP
= . R/W(CHORD) A +26.302 -L-
E r).302 -L_ O 45.000 (RT)

/
\ l (147.66 64')
()47.
\
-
?
\ EfP

SCALE"
so 0 20 M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRAN
DIVISION OE HIGHWAYS SPORTATION
MOORE COUNTY
S.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAG E, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
_
I)1?NO'Clis Tl?.M1I]'. I1-ll'AC1' IN \Vll'LAND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
p p
p^ .
p
p
^ A
`
r
^
`
DUL•• TO D4LCIIANICAL CLEMUNG OF SR 1825.
DL'YOND CONSTRUCTION LIIvUTS
SCALE AS SHOWN
0SNOTE5 PILL IN I"IST LAND.
S?
VEMESER 1997
?
NO
OF
SHEET
0
0
cl)
P 00. R/W -C -e E)
A
+56.000 -L-- N
45.000 (LT) v
C, _ (147.64')
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
J 7-' N N
A(F1.T a
E- N N N
z o- ?a
? GV Sj
-L- US / o <
N 62' 45' 59.7' E `W o ,9p65 .s
J s .. z F E A L I /
J +T NO H D R CATf1 N
RM GUTTER F 2G1 a
+44 ?4C
4 3!5 PC
Z mn CS FUNNEL
DR-IN W/ EL'--BOW
0
vi \ N
v s ' LA A
W FABRIC
6 m FILTER
C
PROP. R A POP. LAT. 'V'_DITCH
_
T N E UJIQK ULIAILA
jER R FABRIC SEE PROFILE
W%A 4,m FIL
PR P. T PR T T N ' / ?'
CH
' V
le 1 '-*41
SCALE
ZA Al 10 !== 29
5 ( T E43
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
n n o o n o n llIiNO1'G! TPhII'. IMPACT IN WL-I'LAND CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
n A A 4 n /+ 1\ A DUL TO DIECIIANICAL CLEARING MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BEYOND CONSTRUCTION IXI IJTS BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
OENrES F(LL IN w=_i LAUD. SCALE AS SHOWN
I
SHEET M? OF NOVEMEBER 1997
T
--1-
1

a ? -
Z

e q ?

I
?I

I

?I
I

-?1 -

Ll ,il

CL
CL I
-
1 I

Q
z O ??
3 .3

%-j 41

Y

t
tin
1
z
1 '
I'
O
I
(- 40+i' ?' d1S "I'W
A ? A m N
z
g
3
4)
0
w
0
LILJ
E
W
J
J
N
W
0
E
0
LLI
J
J
,Q N
f
QZ
N ?
a
a
= o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET AVOF -?5-0 NOVEMEBER 1997
r

/fir
ARCHIE L.
DB 1115 f
57
WOODS
_ Np TOE:
r' , 6 EXIT RT . 1 N
N, DB:.
aI b
?kc LO
??
1141(3)1
w Ic
? I
+83.750 -Y2- I o I
13.000 (LT) 1 i
I ? I
+74.342 -Y2- 270
13.000 (LT)
4.4
?X. --
- E LINy_- r EMpV
Idn
5 o ,DAME S
TYP • o SR 1864
o 152 MM (6"? WL -
Yn V w cam--? EIP
G Z p RIV
693
RAVE _
-? o
N RIVE IPE
AR 68 -OpE?KE ENE III w
VSL ?'' E
G19
`'?- /W o w R
+_ SPeGI-L o
+15.:)000 -Y2- --
+' 13. y? oo (R.t ape NO"TM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
-p L! a ?O4{ TRANSPORTATION
& m I
ISF BUS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
' CANOPY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
.0 = 7,? OFT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
I 'O
a -? MOORE / LEE COUNTY
` PROJECT 8.T560302
N-y
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2176 AT LAKEVIEW
m o to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
BASE ° m
SHEET' OF58
%
NOUT 0 %
DETAIL 'DD'
-POE wooDs
W% 5 m2 FILTER FABRIC
CP -ter
?-+
L_ AR W
o"at-
-. •y w • tl
`? .>? ?' ARIES
+55.871 -Y2-
13.000 (LT) „?
/ N
N _ - l98 43' It
m Y. X: /
6-
5.000 RP' B' ? ? I '.k
000 (LT) 8. 43') T1 y C
C FABR N
I A w' 4 tLSER
ILEE 4 L C
,
O c
N G
„y NN N v - - ?? r •
O < r
2c I -L- US I -w
lp
?. y r O
'a
n
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NVl
_ 2GI
d
65' -? - - - - _ RA_MPG- - s c Na 18.333 lTYP.
N 65603y'59. T E -
N v
C' ? w.,
^ i ,jg5.000 RS) PR P. I V' T It, l v .. N N, 4 8 T <` f.
_r-- ? 198.43) SEE ?ltf ?? ??- ?? ?`? '??'???.
1 - F - FpgRIC
R
e=PO POE 1 -- G M/ 9 mT F tLTE
3R 1 C\ E ?01 / S G E-^-E-E- A
T N PROP. R/M
A ? V r` /? - v/ - (CHORD)
9.,46 A.A
RP C ) RP' C
F11 TFR PAR f0 ? C
p?P Q
000 aP,
A5' RS) (98.43 jRj )
000 RP' Ca08.6p0 (RS) , 30 ? gl all 0 .00 .50.
'As- fall 34.000 I l98• q?
40.0023. ) t11I•55
t13A.2's 00 aPle. tER FpgatC ` y
4 m F)L (n
45.000 ART) v/
(14'I.64
SITE#6 _
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J???• ?'? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
SCaLf. PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
?o m to a 20 M MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
A O O L. o DENOT'C.S T ENUI. INUPACT• IN WLrrLAND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
0 A t' A A A A DUL' TO r21SCIlANICAL CLEARINU OF SR 182 5 .
BL'YOND CONSTRUCTION LMUTS SCALE AS SHOWN
OcNC+TES r'lLL IN Ir)ci LA.`:fJ.
SHEET AOOF 68 NOVEMEBER 1997
?l A vl
\
\ I

43
0

H
E
0
z
3
\
\
\1 ?
? z
?ij
1
1
\I
I
i
1
1
1
11
1
/
/

A
Q

w \
3
A
H
O :? -
U
y( J I
Q ?
? w {
_ ?I z
Q. -
I ?
Q
E
Z
N ? g t0 _[.d of -
> w
O ? •7?
_ O
It H /
J N ? O.. W
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
a DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
= O MOORE COUNTY
S.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET it OF S8 NOVEMEBER 1997
13

n
.r ?f c
d
++
M ? C
1:1

-N
_o
P
r
t
N
r
_o
H
J

?t
W
N
/
E
a
?1
a

_ r?¢
N ti
Q
cc d
S>
N
0
_ p
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- 1n MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
f MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
_ BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS
SHOWN
SHEET OF ? w NOVEMEBER 1997
III
- -o
_ 1n

%5 _M
Z _
f

_V\

_o

6
g

z. 3
'?T w

w
? 0

_c 'L
i z
o
Q

A
Q
s
0.
0

- I,)
-0
0
A ul
Z Z
? z
w
3 ?.
n
? w.
su w
C] O
E
a
- 111
_ O
c1 w
2-1
-"Q Ng Q
0
2> N
O
\? - ul
t 'A
1
Z -
Q
S
-N
- %r`1
-0
-1D
-O
_U)
-O

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
_ o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
N
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
Z ?I Q SHEET a OF -546 NOVEMEBER 1997
?1 - 9
ri-N
m
z ?
V
i
_ O
S o

,.rte

x
N•=

I
/? ?
I
5g0/
V ? ? 5 6

I /

/ I

3E ?
?
3
C
A
/ PR P. AT. IT H
SEE DITCH OETAIL '9'
I
SEE PROFILE
?
___.
C
3?S
V
F
- / ?y?, ?
____
'y'-
C
P 2GI
SEE FALSE SUM
DETAIL II

(SUMP 2GI - -
6004
RCP
I
p65 M
C
.g U

q'
V E
E 1
O 1
FA MP .
A
2GI

C F -?
C

I
wIOS

4
TONS
T
5
CLASS B RIP RAP
W/ 12 m' FILTER FABRIC
.
m
.
A
?W ES
W'/ 14 m FILTER FABRIC
C
' A
,
I
O PROP, AT. AS H
SEE
SEE PROFILE E AIL C
---
SGALF
ZD m1 10 0 20 M
.51 Ti V:` -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
n o 0 0 <+ o C. DUNOT" TEN11'. I:VU'ACT IN WLTLANO
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
^ A A A A
DUB TO AlECIIANICAL CLEA1tINC1
' CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
BEYOND CUNS1
KUC77UN L1hllTS MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
y,,r .fir BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
yv DENOTES WETLAND OF SR 1825.
pENO-ES GILL. IN W ai "'ID. SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET _V OF ? NOVEMEBER 1997
.9
n •• T
SEE FALSE SUMP m 6
DETAIL I
a (TYPE 'D') -
SUMP
I
i.6Z3 -
RT.
n
9?HAL DITCH _0 1
i
1 9
2GI
DEPTH)
- E
SEE FALSE SU)PO
-DETAIL 11 Std RCP 2GI
-' Em
\ c_.... \ L- POC 44#44.277. 25075 RT.
\ -L-8ASELINE PIMC 34,62911
GEORGE R. BLUE-- ` SLDPE STAKE LINE
EST.. IJL- \ DB 134 PG 29
W1 F"mn RIC \ 28
\P %? f 92
7RIC C ? p
83?
4
-- - - -?. :? .ce
*714 ml FILTER FABRIC
to 15+09691
3' 08.4
f
}
GEORGE R. BLUE
DO 163 PG 274
28

3 PIS Ste 2+46.956 PIs Sto 3+26.953 PI Ste 3+99
'
fLT) e-439'190' e-422'36.3' 24.
A-1533
Ls - 65.000
ST - 0
660 Ls - 55.000
ST -1&344 L - 97.747
T - 49176
.
LT - 41348 LT - X678 R 3W.-
SO-0.04
D.S. - 80 km
PIs Sto 3+88.668 PI Sto 444103
8-,f 35' 01.2 A- IT 53' 41.9 (LT)
Ls - 48,000 L - 72754
ST - /&0/0 T - 36.556
LT - 320/1 R - 300.000
Se - 0.04.
C I
\ P
RAMP
RAMP
? F
A Ri
C ?
A
W4.65T RP'C'
70.000 (RT)
101mop*N °+a NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
°Gy TRANSPORTATION
•
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P4 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
7OFENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE I LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET 15 OF $$
-5
;f I
f
13•$00

20J
U
r
20t IS) E7AI, S SUiF
TTrcp

»vzs
I; . -?D ---
may.
SEE FALSE SUFP
DETAIL J
£cr SEE RD Vy 'ST
• 84 5 I1700TCE7
~ 1 C
O C 2CI Q ® DSEE IL FALSE I SU4p
ETAIL
£IP
O
IiE 48E 8
0 o c j5 -rb ?V°s ryCe"r MPS T6
Oc?1?-C.5 GIL.L IN wcTLA.tiD.
Ccvo',2S ExCS+va-nDnl in1 W?7LAND.
SCALE
11 Bill EMMMM==9
Zi M 10 0 201+1
/ I
r?
5 i; H 9
KEITH BYRD
DB 510 PG 444
?= 4 2 '
NL
C
A
T• TONS
/
CLASS B P RAP
W/ 10 m2 FILTER FABRIC ==
F 115
c? F / - -, -
wLe -
_ WL
PROP. SPECIAL DITCH
0
V N '??oe Noere NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
2G I '
N N ?p DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
?• ?`? PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
Elf
f O owrn?Ng` ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
(Q0 MOORE I LEE COUNTY
n? cV PROJECT 8.T560302
Q? ?^• IN US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
Z Z 0 SHEET OF 5$

\ KEITH BYRD
DB 510 PG 444
\ 42

D OLDHAM
;s PG 95

M \
31
I _- SWEE S7IAK•E LINE __--
1T
SEE FALSE SUMP
°p E
201.
* ! X. DEPTH)
d
\ 2G?
•???? DETAIL 11
(TYPE 'D')
r ?'9ss / SEE FALSE
T.REV.
FE11.
,,"'p0010000
N CARO
IiS XeLSSIQI
s SE AL
14509
i
N
-
A #.
s ?
? N
450mm RCP °
T PR
N CARO??.??s
•?e?e??e??s?s ??
a
l
SEAL
20 737
3'3?Db
r?
?? p
-r =
Zr
Q
r 2N
.n r (?
2GI Y

IH .PING 38+ .7---J
? i? ... I
?+?Op NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
?~eO4y TRANSPORTATION
• DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFTR? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
\"?! MOORE / LEE COUNTY
RAP o \ `?,; „?
Y 'r
WO=
PROJECT 8.T5603O2
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET 16OFS
I
O
O
a 5
114. s \'
O\ •
m s i r L
i^ LA' T N A V ?- ,-`R.k'WP_-A POT STA. C
W/ 6'. FILTER FABRIC 114.200, =03'0(
-LAST STQ 513
1+04.000 RP'A' C
PROP. R/W
.30.000 (RT) \ A --
F 98.43') (CHORD)
.
1c P/3 15.4 rn T
RAA
400mm CS 'W
+42 BEGIN 5 / SS m= FILTER FABRIC
/ -
t-7 M U
A .
00,
3 E
A
-----------------------
.-----------------
" T - - S 3910' 57.8° W
\ +40
t 300mm CS FUNNEL
DRAIN W/ ELBOW
tl?,/oooy VEb?`t
Over sr!d-I 6.5
4T '?
=
358 -
00, (L
.64' )
I" 1
1
Q
Q
Q
J uY
Z
-1
1
- - - - - F L ?11s?G -Aa c 11 G CAtI 0
T.S m TON •• W/ 4 m° FILTER FABRIC 'MW
CLASS 8 RIP RAP W/ 4
(Bftl N
° FILTER F 3u c5

180.0 ?(
m
q
W/ 4 mz FILTER FABRIC }
f _ °i'
A IL
ULL YAI
\?
C
I'\\ A PROP. R/W
i ?j•'. '•
I RAMP D POT\ TA. 0+00.000 14.200 RT)
-L- ST STA. 51+82.358
'O

IO (
1
SCALE
aMES ?12PVR7;W I ,VNC+?o?Wi?5 ?A? ID O ?a rYl
V
^^^
T # f O NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
n a o o c. 6 0 1)JiNO'1'L•'S Tls&il'• Jhll'ACT IN WL"1'LANL B .T560302 R-210A
n A n n n n n n DUE TO I(IL''CIIANICAL CLEMUNCI
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
I1IL] ONI) CONSIItUC1ION LUrIITS CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
y` DF?IDtES weTl?+tJD
'? BYPASS FROM SA 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
y? 3,
-'k
_., OF SR 1825.
DE>voTES GILL tN WEi LAtiD• SCALE AS SHOWN

5$ NOVEMEBER 1997
SHEET OF
-pewrE5 rill II,/ s(JAC6 ORTG2S
THOMAS GRIFFIN
© OB 644 PG 196
IL K \ g/ i
I
10 Sam Arn.*-,*..'
?
`J
w
Z
J
1
_ T SEE FALSE SUMP
2G! DETAIL III
N U
N N K
r ?a E
CAT=1 8 1 -
/=180.0FULL I/ l{ B ERM GUTTER EST9 TS
L> A
NE W/ 4 .' FTER FABRIC
.
q PROP. R/W \
{ +00.000 -1
45.000 (R'
s s 1
(147.64')
I
&.-,. ?- wo?ar rE
,r oPAp
C PROP. R/W i
,
A ?
B&UNIFORM ffAPER %Q
o
v CLASS
(1 'A9RI W/ 4 m

•• +
:?•
L +03 EN
DOM CS FUNNEL I M
•• . / L DRAIN W/ ELBOW MELT

*
IC
W/ 6 m* FILTER FABRI(
C-
. LAT. 'V' DITCH
?9ITF, 410

-s acQvprloa ?,? hlerr.?iuDs
flS.Wo ES FILL IN WETLAND.
DENOTES wert._aND
V%W -M NECH,4a.cAL,c\cactnr Beyorsd
crnstructlon 1?H?-?
r' • ° Iellarws Fill w _5urrAc.e vjRTLR-S
SCALE
2oR? ,0 0 20 M

f
o

+Z5 1

A i
`
i
?
-

!
o o E N? -
c

w -A
3 -

J N
Q
Q
U Q
? o
_

2 3
0
I
u]
O
I E ?

f

I >
C
F- J --

J
`
Z r
1
,
0

3 ( ? _
?
LLJ
_1
- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
w
U
'
MOORE COUNTY
/ z 8.T560302 R-210A

/ _ PROPOSED GRADING, PAVI NG, DRAINAGE, FENCING
' p CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
* MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
Q L BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
I ' OF SR 1825.
I SCALE AS SHOWN

- e
SHEET ? OF S v
NOVEMEBER 1997
CS=I ?r
6l N p?
a=1 ?f

I : (\II
J
t
I d d d f-ill
_ .n
N
n
Q
}
F
- ? r
1
-m
_o
_V\
Q
T
Q
Z
Z
Sy] -?
3 '
w ?
O o
w
U O
x
5
0
a?
Ng ?
d}
N _> N
o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
N 8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
- O CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
v SCALE AS SHOWN
V1 SHEET A OF? NOVEMEBER 1997
Z ' ? ? 22
I ?
-°
Z ?1
f
i

,V
l\
L

a \
/ o

it H \
D
\
\ N
F
® ?z

V O

? LU[G
a3y
CCC

?y-
E7 ,-,;? C?
O Cc'O
Z

G
a
QG
v w G
G
G
I
Q G

r Q
G
-
v , e
3 3 QG
K
a
a a

\
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
\ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LL` 3
MOORE COUNTY
a
o
a S.T560302 R-210A
a
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
PAVEMENT
SIGNING
STRUCTURES
V
Q ,
,
CUL
ERTS,
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
.ul
a
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
C
SHEET & OF 6® NOVEMEBER 1997
Z3
= \? ?
? r 3
1 ?• i
I
m
K
? ? Z
Z K

0
a ?
I i
1
F- ~
LL

LL
y?
?
W
a i

I
I

C ¢F
1
i %N :N aw'
?

;N

I

w f- \
a

a
U , \\

a `

LL OH \
o rW- ?-
1 ? E LL ? ?{ y k a til
I c e

a o 0
k

?I
?? H K
II ? m
QLL
Z
?
i
OO
/ SS Z ?

f/
f a a
•- E
I
? N ON 3? w
? r
•g• 'S'd
- ,, s
?
z•t Z
7
I
\

'd
it Z'L 0 0'L Z'L ZI
` NV 3W

o
b I

?M I

o•sb a I o•sb

\ LLI

't ZCL (0'L 0'L Z'L Z.t F
M
Ntl 03w
??

• U \A•z
0'Sb I 0'Sb
'S'd 'S'd a 1
x
? Q
? I Z' t Z' t F I
o I
ON N I

I s .
\
o?)
?F
Lc1
?
W?
3
?-

W

?OI

O
N
? f
1
'
Q
1 I
N
Q ?I
I
I _

E
0
J
J °
4 `v
F-
Q o
d
8
? O
Zd
J

3

w
O
ut

o
J ? ?
Q
? N
W

O
00
ul
0
? g
Q
z 3
3 u
? W
z? 5 0
-? Q Q O
J ? .D
5
Ng
N d
I? O i> N
O V e
N Z
r
J - ?
Q
+
Lo p
Ln ILV ?
0
o _ W
r
H FNORTHCAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAYS
z 4 8.T560302 R-210A
N PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
t? CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
V N MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
ui I BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
Ln ` OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
¢ NOVEMEBER 1997
SHEET _19 OF s?j
o w
W ?
w -
a? o
w
rn
f:
e
I
SROP. SPEC I ATABE_yRt
SEE PROFILE L,
-Y4- ,
(LT) I
PROP. R/W
I TAKE INE -

S' 17 F 12-

w c--
- o
LIJ (D
c iw = -}_
w - F - V) N
3% " E -? 0
SR 2005 CYPRESS CH z
___ 1 1 1 O
1.10R NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
STAKE LINE -'E?ISn7D? °j~ TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFT"s ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
PROP. R/?/ MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
PROP. LA T. 'V' T H to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SEE DITCH DETAIL A
SEE PROFILE SHEET2bOF58
S ; , I_ 12-
31
© ??po x EST. 10.0`?m
W/*' 24 M2 F I L
ZN? 2 -

AT. 'V' DITCH
'CH DETAIL
IF I LE ?ld? idE \ ,? \
053 N / U-)
• \ -•?
%
PROP.
HEADWALL ?. ?/ \r { \ ,
_,-±
j , j?+4
BEGIN SHOULDER
' -kBERM GUTTER \ ` `T \
3 +43
\
400mm-CSP
W/ (2) ELBOWS \
+45.74 -L-
45. 000 (LT) Xj
C
T. 0.9 m TON
CLASS B RIP RAP
W/ 4 m? --FILTER FABR I
i, PROP.
V _.
t AIL DITCH SEE DITCH DETAIL 'V` EST. 0.9 m TONS
CLASS 'B-RIP RAP
W/ 5 m 2 Fj LTER FABRIC /
GRAL,
PR( /1S7 u,
EE
SEE
Ir
Z`
t.
TRAF. BRG. \
DI W/ ANGLE\
VANE GRATE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFTR?MS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH

MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A

SHEET
2
58
*? OF ,4q
u
/J ( /)
`
`
`
v
1
S I' T E 13
N?
N Lo
N •
Imo- ?_
O ?

U
?..
T N ,
T.
RPRA
?i - W% 52 m 2 FILTER FABRIC
PROP, S? P??L DITCH LT• S .0 T NS-
w? AFABRI C
W/ 5 m2 FILTER
oOCAT 8. R MOVE
+60.000 -Y4- EX I ST . 600mTn C.
13.000 (LT) °
F
+30.000 -Y4- F
9.144 (LT) pvap • FZ C? R
2 La EMOVES EHIIIX I CONS
^? o
.ter
F ?_? r J 0 o R SPIKE
? o
? SR 005 --ZZlZ
CN
N CyPRES
ty? .? r ?rlrL-.C. -
F
N°RTH cy9 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
PROP • TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
oFTR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
I +30.000 -Y4-
I 9.144 (RT) MOORS /LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
0.000 ?j US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
N :4- to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET IS OF 58
IARD zz
S i i E J `(
CO ??I I NN
[? off. ?, ??W
V J ?N?
EST. 13.6 m TONS +53.000 -y
'? of I I 15.000 (LT
W/ 31 m2 FILTER FABRIC U)? ; 19.000 (L1
i
+43.000 -Y4- ?'•
15.000 f T) 8-??
7 19.000 ( T)
+25.000 -Y4-
15.000 (LT) UNABLE
D • ALL UIG i
OTHER USG
MAY EXIST
I
F
t= I ING R/W
13.0
t YP.) COLLAR ??'?
o?
r-
o
-wijO 3 w
- -- ------=44 - ?;
)-4.R 8
RAVEL105Omm NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
T V / TRANSPORTATION
m C NC i l
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
t79 r C 3 ?G OFTRA ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
r r ?.
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
r " rROP . R/W VPU
- PROJECT 8.T560302
h r ;r: +20.000 -Y4- HEUS 1 F
ROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEw
j 17.368 to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET 2 q OF SS
3 A \\A ' A A?.? A PROP. R/W (CHORD). C
+76.796 -L-
45.000 SRT)
/ H A
(147.64 I
__ SITS ?¢cZ.
Hopu7DmTAL -CZ-ALE
Q Q OO DF.NMS5 AmmoNAt. WCr4RAO rmPAO-r
o (0 20 R\ TOO Im A' MWZW /MPAC7S
AG
OENS cS PILL IN w=_TLAND.
p p p p p p PEn10T TEMD. IMPACT IN WETLAND
V6666 p p p L) DLIETO ME HAN ICAL. CLfAfUL1L-
BEYONO CONSTF-ILTID.) L.IMIT5.
DE+?csfi;S EKGAVATIOni im We'fLAND,
D44 C)
PROP. LAT. 'V' DITCH
TDE +2C
TDE?-TDE 68.
(22
CL FrY \
SPECIAL TYPE 'A'. SILT BASIN
W/ PERFORATED 600mm CS 156
RISER / TEE CS
a$-/

HORIZONTAL SCALE
..?.
O to 20 aom
DENOTES GILL IN i ]:TW.`ID•
;•.'.'.'•.' DENOTES:IL.LIN SUAFA.C?- W4TeR.
?•O.Q.Q.Q ?• PEr10T):S TEMP. =MPAC.T IN 1„1ETLAND
ha-Al 6 0 6 6 6 (3LYOND GONSTlu.1riDN LIMNS.
\ BAR RANCH
OB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618
0-L-
(LT)
0'] i
HAYES
+34.000 -L-
3•' ? ? 45.000 ) LT )
?fi47.64 ] ^?
CLASS -8-
FILTER AFABRIC
? ?• ?? ? 7. m T N
W/ 48 m' FILTER FABRIC
8 2G! W/
4 mm W/ FLAT GRA7
LB( OWS
?I I:._ 2L- W/ /54 PROP
1 LA a FACE CUIDERAIL
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL III
'VA. N
L A
m TONS
CLAS RAf
W/9m=FILTERF,-
i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVINI, DRAINAGE,FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES,
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN ?i
SHEET 0 OF NOVEMEBER 1997
31
SITE #16
? SCALE
20M 10 0 20M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND. MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302
i PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING. DRAINAGE• FENCING
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS CULVERTS.. STRUCTURES. SIGNING. PAVEMENT
• •• MARKINGS. AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
•;•'• DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAS
• .• OF SR 1825
?o a e° DENOTES TEMP. IMPACT IN WETLAND SCALE AS SHOWN
DUE TO.MECHANICAL CLEARING
SHEET??OF?
BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
DRAIN POND

SITEt '
0 J BAR RANCH
08 530 PG 988
,DB 453 PG 618
DER? L
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SCAIZ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
20m 10 0 20111 MOORE COUNTY
DENOTESI7LL W WETLAND 8.T560302 R-210A
DENO'rl!S 10CCAVATION IN WLTLANDS PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
PAVEMENT
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING,
DENOTLSFILL IN SURPACLNVATIM MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
A p p p [1 n ? 1)IiNO'1'I:S T1ibU'. IhU'AC1' IN WETLAND OF SR 1825.
,
n A A A A n A A DUL•' TO NIEC1 ANICAL CLEAIUNO SCALE AS SHOWN
DI;YOND CONS*ntUCTION LUvUT$
NOVEbiEBER 1997
?
TOTAL OF 2,3`kA. OF IMPACT TO SVRFAm WATER OF
SHEET
?e
Kill r
NAD R
+51.000 -L-
166.000 (L7)
\ (544.62')
I
t
,
+93.000 -L-
©J BAR RANCH .? „ /14t-;00;0 ()L7)
08 530 PG 988 (479-00
DB 453 PG 618
p0N 0
? N
Z
Z J
v
,,•• ? TDE _.,. TDE TDE
c +84.038 +53.000 {-
45.000 (LT) 106.000 15
\ (147.64') (347.77')
\ Aq
°" - SCALE
Zorn 0 20 M
S/?? aJ-' J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J ^tf' ( DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
?E To7-AL of 2,3G {1Q, OF IMPACT TO PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
SURFACE WATER DUE Tb DRAININ& POND. MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS'ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET _ OF !e9 NOVEMEBER 1997

VNEY090
N ® {yb. Wv
241.000 (
t 790.68'1

OlkA w POND
`i
213.000
?-? (696.92'1
SCALE
tor; to 0 zo M
SITE #17
TOTAL OF 2.3 6 /14a. OF IMPAG 7- TO
SURFACE W"' RM-DUE TO DRAINING POND.
Wa
i
I& J BAR RANCH
T O
? OB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618 N
r.
M'.w_
PROP. ST B RM DTCH M/ PR P. T .
_? v BERM DRAINAGE OUTLET
MATTING CROP. STD. ??
?.-- M/ 6- FILTE
? A mm M 2GI ??3C?/? -------- O2G;
I1 -1 L
r - - r?..r vnwrc
MELT ?? ?ETAILLIE SUMP ? ?0 CS M
t 2GI F
4¦/6e
X/ 12 m FILTER FABRIC
F AT. 'V' DITCH \ 3E Y 3k
SEE TAIL--K-
SEE PROF1lE
w.c_s E 41: ® J BAR RANCH SITE 1$
DB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618
20iu 10 0 20w
DL'NOTLSIZLLIN WETLAND
r? n4 ii n n A 1)JiPtO'I'LS TJiW. INWACT IN NVLTLAND
L? VUE TO DIECIIANICAL CLEARING!
DL'YOND CONSTRUCTION UI4IITS
DEr4CrM5 EXLAVATiDrI IKI We-Tt.AND
N.GGAID
NwD K

J M

TWOS
SEE DITCH DETAIL F
SEE PROFILE
8 m TONS 186 SE
113FILHTIIERHFABRIC
\yCP -
SLE
2G1 F
O SEE FALSE SUMP - AS N P NC 62.11
185 DETAIL 11 ?? • ;L-POT 7304.889.1.730
ASELME P7NC 61,29.580_ .
PR GU DuIDERAIL
'OT 7207.853.2.046 RT. `,FA CEP
S E ALE UMP i
\Wm D T? u? l N Z37"
ittt
?T? G[w/r,
A G ATE
tTE
CS W/ I 4 W 2
b WT l 2 OWS
-- , x(11- 3
A6 ml FILTERRFABRIC
\ +40.000 -L-
45.000 (RT)
(147.64')

HOR17-DNTAL SLALE.
O 10 ?- AOm
DENOTES GILL IN WETLA.170.
G.G G G G G G Pemo-rCS TE.MR 2M7AGT 1?1 .6,1p"TLAND
OG G G G G G r3 YOND GONSTFCL](-AIC)h1 L.1M1 -5
sIT? /8Q.
r
t s?;E 18?

WOODS

/
I
?c
?t
A
~
PR P. AT. ' V`

s. PROPAAT. 'V%_ DITCH ?
'
' SOIL - FORS
SEE DITCH DETt
SEE DITCH DETAIL
A
SEEP FILE SEE PROFILE
ool
SLOFE ST L E -?"

N I \
N VI A101. OUBLE
:
, 13
FA ERAIL

\ SEE FALSE SUMP
!
r
\
DETAIL III ..-?
Us l N /93 xv
G
I
EX. DEPTH)

C 4N . '. /95 2G I W/
- Noft NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
H TRANSPORTATION
. FLAT GRi

73
q = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
' OFTMR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH \ \
-

P (2) E
/
MOORE / LEE COUNTY i 196
PROJECT 8.T560302 '"'?-- - ---
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW EST. T
'
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A CLASS B RI P RAPS
W/ 16 m FILT R FABRIC \
SHEET 38 OF 5' \

aim a .. _1
J

C w
FIORIZUh1TAL SCALE
Rpm
O ID 20 ADm
(?ENJT ES FILL. IN W£TLAND' DENOTCS :ILL IN SURT;AC- WaTErZ.
Q Q•Q Q Q • PENO•scS TEMR IMPACT IN WETLAND
Q Q Q Q Q 61V6 DLIETO MECHANICAL C.LI=ARINL-
UcYOND C,ONSTKLICYIDn1 LIM1T5.
-51 T46Z / 9
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
S.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT .
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWY Q
SHEET S OF 5Q . NOVEMEBER 1997

PROP.
V HEAD DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 'V'

A
LAT. 'V' DITCH
A
'
'
A
ITCH DET
IL
ROF ILE -,-
OPE _
STAKE LINE)
PROP. LAT.
SEE DITCH DETAIL A /
PROFILE
SEE

• tO
\ PROP. DOUBLE /
\ FACE GUIDERAIL
SEE FALSE SUMP
\ \ \ DETAIL I I I
\IV
2G I 20? N 37'36.5m E -L- US l ;
i; U '
777
_
W/
l I t 2GI

N to
_
_
NORTh NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF a
TRANSPORTATION
1
BERM GurR t
I.DER:
o zl DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
??ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH .

C 400m
i
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
VIEW
L
-SU`
AKE
US OMNORTH OF SR 2175 AT
L
North of SR 1825, R-210 A
r? SHEET 4Q OF SS

^
? EST. 4 m TONS
4
AD I 1 ES$J 1.8
2
OTO D _Wi -1 0 m
CTI TFR FARRTr
J
OD
O
O
15
H-GORM r'
SAD as
J
O

J
I
s
r
z
0
w
J
S
•

+40:000 -L- ? J t'y ±
? =?"?"' ?•". -':?.
•
_ -,: ?-?. .. ..
-
..-
/'• X45.000 IRT)•:
(7?.TY4-)?. _ ..._r
.. LA p
f2;}?' '.•• w/ P7 M= FiLSFR-FABRIC ••
:? --,.
-•
-
'
Q` • ... K IS U CNEER
PL CL

REOGA R. THOMAS
DB 133 PG 406
SITE?2l
SCALC
20u, 10 0 ZOn,
DLN0TES FILL IN WETLAND
:J Di3N0T1;S FILL LY SUIWACL' \VATEIL
O O O ti t. O Od DENOTES T)--'MP. IbII'ACT IN WE'T'LAND
^ ^ DUE'fObIECIIANICALCLE'ARINCI
BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LRVUTS
CH
L
O ?
J © 0
PROP. "o
SEE PRCFmILml^su SEE DITCH DETAIL 'R' f?F
10
' N - ,•
-Jo
... .
Q N L
1 ' ? _ TONS :?? ,i N.
_F .? ?m' F1LTE C
,r _C 1 ` J
J x- ROF. c 'I R p vk'' _
f - -
/DRAIN M/ ELB M ` 27. tRTA SEE D CH D TA 'C' C5 1-uml J L A - /
ER F BRIO •?° ?jM? /' -fir
/ TE?PoQAa•?j IM.PAC-TS .. ..
J OlttE ?D T1M6E12
?..to2ti MASS
SITE ZI
ScluZ
20ut 10 0 20111
DENOTE•SIM.L.IN WETL1ND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
llL'NO'f15 L\CAVATION LY \YIiTLANDS
MOORE COUNTY
40 6 U U 6 0 DETIOTE.S • EN11'. INU'ACT IN WE'L'I-"D 8.T560302 R-210A
n A A A A n n n UUE TO AiIXILANICAL CLEMUNO
BEYOND CONSTI UCTION LIA-1ITS PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
TEµ? ?M?-r Cut TO BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIL•W TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
'T"aEV- Woe+ OAT:-. = 0.2 ha
At SITE ZI SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 0 OF NOVEMEBER 1997
4 Z, eEJ. 0% 0/ 0%
' NGO7L3D
N
TEM polz&rL.i U.n.PAat' cup-
TI?xaEd \c1oPX tJA.TS ?
O
O
K
SITE 21

+80.000

D
EE DITCH D •
o AIL 'S' R P.
I
G m SEE RITCH DETA
'
_
ZS --rx IL
.°° °°r-t- -
r- 00 CS UN
Lsow. CL

I A M1
v
`I
! B
\ \ \ ` 8 I
--I \
?- \
TIER

O '

03 \ \ `/

: BERM G
URA UTTER
?r
-

-L- TS 81-181
7
.. ,
_
o AT. v' CH
SEE PROFILE
ib -
K
SITS ? 21
ScAl'L
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
20ut 10 0 2Oui DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LL'NOTLS PILL IN WL'TLLYD
MOORE COUNTY
n n o O [. o O I)II.No E."'fti.'?IP. I:vU'ACT IN WETLAND
1 q A A n n A DUK'CO 11L''CIIANICALCLIDUtINU S.T560302 R-210A
BL'YOND CONSTRUCTION LMTS
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
?
?? _ ?: -
•.',•; DErNOIESPILL. IN SLlR:A = 4??TEn CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND. SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
Q
2114
OF J v NOVEMEBER 1997
fSA
SHEET

LL
0
ce
CL
J
i
-7- OZ+ 08 'b1S '7'W
a
?J

? - 0
o
I
I'
t
1

a

1 -

I _
I
1. r
1
t. -
I
IZ
I
}
a0

1
00 027 t 1 1
t -
t.
r --
t
o
N
oO
t?
1
-I
I
a
z
n
E w
o ?
W
J
N
QZ
N o ?
E
co
Lu
-A
QJ
v
N
w
O
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
' - MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN -
SHEET yT OF '<g2 NOVEMEBER 1997

4
ik
Q
,a
as
2
J
i
O
0
co
7
7
E
-o
f
f - in
z
-20

? I
f

N

O
- M
lO , -M
LU I

I ?
I
v
-U1
Q
co
I
r
lco
OO)
0
r)
rI
? Q
by
V
Z
0
W
O
-N
z
-D
-o
_in
6

3
z

u

w

m
0
4
z

a

_ 7

H
a?
z?

a
? 5

U
Q .0
Y

N

0 N X
O L
E
?I.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
S.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET * OF . NOVEMEBER 1997
qs
J
1 -?
J
K
Q
0
av
1 4-
00
-04-
0
-3
E
-o
I
is
WW1 J
_O
_!Q
oaC a'
J 9- -0,4
_N
N
U4D
O
1-
0
O
V
/I
1 ^
I j
I Q'
1
-tA
M
\? M
1(4
I ?

P
i

N
I

IL

I _ vl ; p 3
r v
I J a
Q ul
Z j
u?i Z ?

LL
I? Q w F
Z
z O
z
;g 0 p p

- u. Z s ?? , ,,
I aa Q ?:
N V ?

- 0 O
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
?) SHEET tg OF tRg NOVEMEBER 1997
44
-'7- OO+SS NOIld1S 3NIlH0iVN

t`
o sr (-I

I ?

•S'd i ' '
• U Q
Z'{ Z L 0?1 1 s Z Z
Z l
' I ?....

;
? r 1 I
I
. 'S 'd
Z I ? 7
V/
I ? ` I
YO H? 9
r I ,
I I
I
I ? I
I

I •
, N ?
t ' ?
.7 I w

I
S 62

. < v O
as ^?
? max 4
.'? g„
O ? ?
Om WW I J L ? a ?

844
' •u {rt I p.
:4 Z
w
Zn- I O
a
re-- 71

i I I . ' ( I
i t Q< ?.
;J
'
L

I ? I Q

® I
?'
? ? I
? ?
? Q
Q< •?•
I r J =.

m ? p
9 'i ur
oW
r
Z K ' WrO
F I
I Y I
:.
I bpd
WW
4
I / 1
I NNV1
e
N p I ?Y
s
I ~

IL
o ?? I
W
? N.
.. .!
1 w
WU0
,.
? .s I
0?
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
gds BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
o
s OF SR 1825.
r SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ?OF 69 NOVEMEBER 1997
N
Z
Q
W `
? N
P
?
O 04
'
CL s
W-
J

Q N
?'
' I
"- .
..
W
to
'I {
"i b I
N
E
L

V co
Q ?' Ww
W W i
NO
b 1 -
p
U
1 .'
_ `
? U Q
( n

W
® , r

Q?w

1 3 0. t I ca
W
C :? c
c
E 1

fn1 1

to

1S -7- °Q tJ
V
O
o ,
?

1 i
''I
V <
C z J j
y
c f ?'OO ` U
I
o[O

o i N s i
? o a z ° b`-o
1 ,'` W ? I ? N Q a Z?a
F
;°
,
Q<
d
C
a
?Q<
fo"

?
S?
7-
r3 ?. s
I
I z

'•
<

//
N
?•'
? 4< • KW
I
?
KJ WH OOW

t
Wu
LL
51
} d
I :aoa
mm„
I l?
WI O
_
L
o E
"
poi
WWI
W? / I •Z t '; L'1 '- 0't 0.1 ; l I "Nb

-fo
U Q , , i. 'SY
1
1
V LL
'1 1
4
STATION 85+00
MATCHLINE NORTH CAROLINA DE PARTMENT O F T RANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAI NAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNI NG, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPO SED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 21 75 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
z
z SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ?o'OF NOVEMEBER 1997
U

i ??-?., D ? :'fit. '_•'':
Ee)
E)
22f
S I-T F E)

'
-
• ? PROP 'V TAIL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL V.
? T N
... CLASS B RIP RAP
gptrm RCP W/ 12
? 2 FILTER FABF
L

?\ \\ (T )

0 _

01
-AN

SUMP
`
:SEt\ FALSE
I
2GI
3
'
,
DETAIL I I-, T
(EX. D.FF H) ?
_r
.i

tr \ ` d

2GI
`
31
"
"
2
D
TYPE
( )
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL 11
400mm CSP
ELBOW
PROP.
_
_ _ \\
'----- --- --= - -
` SOIL-(

PROP. STD. BERM DITCH
PROP-
RAMP C FUTURE f
(14.200 RT., A= 02* f
-1 POT STA. 87+80.
OF NOnik? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFTR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T5603O2
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET U4 OF CA 8?I

i`"• I ? A N-v
1 m
?
'• e
C
A 6
\
I \ SEE DITCH DETAIL M' ?,
`\ w
s

\ Alft
r/ 18 NI FILTER FABRIC
? _-
Q
SLOPE STAKE LINE I -?' --
d RAMP 8 FUTURE is

N N in .? ? \ } ` `• 30.0 UNIFORN TAPER

-L- US I N /45Y 09.8' E 20

N ? x rr C a

01
%: RAA1P C FUTI/R SEE FALSE
DETAIL 11

y
,••'? 4 PROP. STD. RERY DITCH

RAMP C FUTURE.
` BERN
SC 1+16.000
•^?,N
I wl

t.- RICH DETAIL-Z'

?' I N
- N; +ao.ooo RP'c'
30.000 <RT)
! C ;
1 A
EARNEST C
EVANS
b AMELIA G Riy CHgg
s 30.000 (RT) '
.
. 4
Di
OB 265 PG 634

V
?
I ? }

S l y Z3

I t ,

t l Jµs
I I

of NORN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

E TRANSPORTATION
W

°? =I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
I ovnu ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
1 EL
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET Xis OF$g
350.000
-a64
& - 80 OvIs

Y
`
lo,
t
a
qpM •
/
SM OITW DETAIL 4;-2
• /

•1
T . us QFINT ; •

SITE 2q - .. •: •:- •:,.! : • f ., :,•.
.::::::::.... .. .

... 3-6 It
e.

70-11.00 .
/svo
1.5 OFFSET
%
0 umber VAN*
® SITE'2q
SCALE
20a, 10 0 2011•
L. ' • : ; -:] DENOTES TILL IN SUIU-ACL WATL"R
„ TOTAL- OF .4& h4. OF JMpACT To SuRFACEk
DUE To DRAIN/W, Pouc.

14.
1.50
h4=.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET A OF .58 NOVEMEBER 1997
5i
II . ,
]0. p,,LTI
_ , wW
' IRITE RACE FILL TO nMWA SLOE STARLTE
try. ' •• \ r STA.94440 TO -L- fTA.SS?t?0 .
t \
WON twrl
Jam-
M0.am Ir'A' ?? A• sC r?:r.?•.r fc ?t IL FASRIC
22.000 tXT1 (RTI
/ '• \
itc \
A
FILTERfANtIC
OM M
I A1RS0N01?R.a
/ ID1E t SORa
#MAIM >UW
q
:.::: :.:............. .
............................:...........
........ ? ? 201
toc. otrTN 53' G4.8' E
t ::....................
::.. .::::...:...................
:.::.::.:. •::....... .
sot SITE-25
INAK tR1TM 1 AIL
?J DRA
ttF
ac
i
IL 'It' a U61A&6 -Ur
Iti IL _
S1TE,41;: 25
SCALE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
20ul 10 0 ZOiu MOORE COUNTY
DUNOTI35 I7LL IN WL'TLAND
r 8.T560302 R-210A
?a K J)WOTLS I'CCAVATION IN WL'TLAND:i
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
O G 10 4-6.-o D1:NollrS TIShU'. IlvU'ACC IN WETLANL CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
4 6 n l VUL'TOD4LCIIANICALCLEAIUNt7 MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
I&YOND CONsntuc7TON LUa1ITS BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
• • • • ?? • SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Nor fe NOVEMEBER 1997
. 52
oz
0
_ ? 5 v
? !
N Q
J
Q O
J
(
j H N
N Z SSt
N
t
N
O
O
r
O _
O
O _
?
O _
OO
O
?
?
O
O
V J .
. G V O G C V \• C.
O
C
O
O
Z
F ? W O

? m
Z N
00
R C O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O o O O O C O

W o O O O O O O O O V O O C
a

J
O!
O
?
?

O
O
O
N
O
In
O

2!
1?
O

O
F
r N O O Y O G O G O C O
LL
Z
E o 0 0 0 o o C. 0 0 o o 0
Fm u
IL
O
?? 0 ? ? O O O N O O O C. ' O c4 m
J
W W
U
C

E-6
3 w o
o 0
0 0
0 o
0 O o
o 0
0 o
0 O
o O
o O
Co o 0
c
v

Q w Q W
m
OR

U

L)

U

U

c:

U

U

U

U

U

U ll

c.)
O
d U
tlN E
E N m
' R'
g C C
° d' C
° K
o K K
° K y O

K ?Tj
N ^? rn
f n
I? .
n
f o
O n
h 0
O 0
O ,
n
!? S g
Ol U h
? ?y
W
J
?tl (?! ?tI YY

LLj

La
La xL
4
~ U J J J r ,(? U U U U U U U
N
W O O O O O F P F H F f H
_ W w w 'm ai o
a i
a ao o m_ ao ao a
O m- --.i
_
aa {a
? Q Q
U Q J
J ?ab„ J '? J S' j J
Z ? C C ¢
O
W ? a

? + ? + ? o ? N co + ? ? ? +
?
N +
r ??{
h< A ? f +
l'f .
f h ?
Yf r r
O N ei .r In o - _ m o?
N Z
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.7560302 R-2 10A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE. FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. I
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO
NORTHEAST OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 0 OF sg Jquz; 1999
n=
u?m
C O V r N _
NO J Z o o °. o o ? 0 0 4 0 0 ° o R
v o o ° o o v v ° o o ° v °
n
Z
r3W p
LIJ Gi
m
2 y
Q ?
r
°o 0 0 ° o o' o 0 0° °o c °
ut o V v o a e o v Q
y i
pp o c o 0 o H 0 0 0 0 0 0
;-E I
_ = F
Zn q? ? 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4i V V
J
00
?? ? E ? o A ?' ? 0 0 0 ^ o o ? 0 0
z J
W W V
J
W
U ?y ?
J 4 r A ° O G O O O O ° o O ° p O
16 `3 ° ° S ° ° °
?I
y
W M W
9L M L n. 0 0 u 0 U v chi tai ,?gRg $ v 0
a $ u
C. r E c z ¢ ¢ rc ¢ ¢ z ¢ n r) ¢ ¢ z m
a ca
F o t5 f f d O' b A
y d
Yl S+ N
J
m Y X Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ![ Y Y Y Y
Q } . W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W W- W W W W W W W W W W W W
} ? K d' /L 6' K 6' 6' _' d' 6' K ? K d' K
5 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U
', V U U U U U U U U U J U U J
N
O O O O O O O O O W ![ O O O
W H rr F Faa {F?• (C Faa i-• r ?- W yF? r F
y? ? F ? F F F r ? ? ? ? V F
Y ^? J J J S J J J J
j J J J
? ? /
. ?
.
H m ? ? J O N .t ? b ^ O N m ^ J
y m o G b A g A A A o m O O p

A
O
g
h
A
1X
N
p?
O
O
O
F
F
+
O
O b A A A A A A m m m
W n
N Z r r O r r O O N
N
N
N
N
5`t
O
?
O
?? ? V
y
y+
?
? g v= t w g N
°i
£ o
41P

r
f
m
m

u

F
E
r
t
l ? W ° ? a
N
6,
Z
W L) 0
J
LLp
J _ E
?
O E ° ? w
J
J W V
K
d A ?
N N

IL O
O

W

K _
o „
CL CA

C °
o g. O
y
ee o r
W m
J
Q
Y Y
W W
} U U
Q Or W 41

N
W O O

J
J
r 2
00

+ +
a r
m
A. w +i
e, a+
' o
N ;
J -?
L N
e
tL I
N y
cl ,

o O ,

Z
u?
vs gy ? g°
ta
Q J.
L'.? a
LL. p o 35
?? N 0
N
OD
O=
F
y°
ar

4,
0 !1
a aW B ?Q
a = a oa
oa c? r` N ?Z
i
rC3
0 200 o?
Z z z

n ro?FW

41
O
J?
.
y
Q
p
.C' &L0 Zp c 00
LL. C' Oy 0y 00 Fw
07 = Qp
Fr
03 0Q
; O
? r
= h
°
Z H _

OF HIGHWAYS
;SHEET AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OUNTY
R-210A
02
D GRADING. PAVING. DRAINAGE. FENCING
S. STRUCTURES. SIGNING. PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSE FROM SR 2 175 AT LAKEV EWD TO 1
AST OF SR 1825.
AS SHOWN
? OF -Sle AVG 1999
RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
PARCEL #
1 1 CAROLYN D. UNDERWOOD Herling Street
MT Airy N.C.
1 2 PAULINE B. STYERS 36392 US Hwy 1
Aberdeen, N.C. 28315
1 3 ALLIENE TAYLOR P.O. Box 129
Vass, N.C. 28394
1 4 GLEN F.FOSTER P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
2 3 ALLIENE TAYLOR P.O. Box 129
Vass, N.C. 28394
3 4 ELIZABETH H. FOSTER P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
3 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
4 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
5 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
5 6 ARCHIE L.BLUE 2204 Arapahoe Ave.
Catonsville, MD. 21228
6 7 MACK BLUE 461 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
7 7a GEORGE BLUE 461 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 8 RICHARD OLDHAM 420 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 9 DEBRA BLUE KEY P.O. Box 53
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 10 EFFIE MARKS 2235 Crane's Creek Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326
9 11 KEITH BYRD 660 N. 6th St.
Albemarle, N.C. 28001
9 8 RICHARD OLDHAM 420 Main Street .?
RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
PARCEL #
20 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
21 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
21 16 LILLIAN O. THOMAS Broad Ridge Rd.
Orrum, N.C. 28369
22 16 LILLIAN O. THOMAS Broad Ridge Rd.
Orrum, N.C. 28369
22 17 EARNEST C. & AMELIA G. EVANS Rt.1 Box 196
Cameron, N.C. 28326
22a 17 EARNEST C. & AMELIA G. EVANS Rt.1 Box 196
Cameron, N.C. 28326
23 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
24 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
25 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
25 19 DOUBLE D FARMS 1394 L. Cooper Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326

RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND
PARCEL # PROPERTY OWNER
10 10 EFFIE MARKS
10 12 THOMAS GRIFFIN
11 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD
12 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD
13 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD
13 13a PIERCE B. IRBY, JR.
14 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD
14 13b MARTIN W. & LUCRETIA P. PINCOCK
14a 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD
15 14 HAYES L. & DORIS M. HARBOUR
16 14 HAYES L. & DORIS M. HARBOUR
16 15 J BAR RANCH
17 15 J BAR RANCH
18 15 J BAR RANCH
18a 15 J BAR RANCH
18b 15 J BAR RANCH
19 15 J BAR RANCH
ADDRESS
2235 Crane's Creek Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326
P.O. Box 613
Vass, N.C. 28394
West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
Church Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
Aiken Parkway
Fuquay Varina, NC
P.O. Box 490
Vass, N.C. 28394
Aiken Parkway
Fuquay Varina, NC
2723 Pepper Mill Road
Sanford, N.C. 27330
2723 Pepper Mill Road
Sanford, N.C. 27330
P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
P.O.-Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
P.O. Box 1741
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
R-2 I DA
8.7560302
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING, DRAINAGE. FENCING
CULVERTS. STRUCTURES. SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS. AND SIGNALS ON 'PRO BYPASS FROM SR 2 175 AT LAKE EWD TO
NORTHEAST OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN 1999
OF S? JULY
SHEET
3
MATCHLINE SITE MAP 2
SITE VIII
-Y ?
NC 24 / C 27 < 32 -M
` NC 4 /NC 27
SITE VII
SITE VI
q coos
RfI?ZpRp31
l SITE V
SITE IV
SITE III
SITE XI

SITE II
SITE I
-L- STA. 98 + 90.000 L.B. (R-210A)
-L- STA. 98 + 90.000 L.A. (R-2108)
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 6.569003T
SITE MAP
vz;""
1
TO SOUTHERN PINES
cy
Ro
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FORM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET ?- OF 3 8/ 2/ 99

TO svS
TRANSPORTATIOT
N. C. DEPT. OF OF gIGHW Al S
DIVISION COUNTY
(R-210B?
I„LOORE/ LEE PROJECT= 6.569003T
NORTH OF SR 1
US 1To NORTH OF SR 118:
OF 31-
SHEET
Od.
O
2
uQ -L- STA. 179+45.047 L.B. (R-210B) _
LREVI- STA. 16+31.750 L.A. (R-21 0C)
y
END STATE PKQJt(-I 00 S
L
ys
I
1
SITE XIV ----"
PINE FOREST RC
(SR 1173)
SITE XIII
SITE -XII
LEE COUNTY
MOORS COUNTY
SITE XVII
w§?----,SITE X
SITE I
l
MATCHLINE SITE MAP 1
- .
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
MAP AP • 2 PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET 3 OF 3+ 8/2/99
SITE XV
? SITE XVI
LEGEND
-?IJLB- WETLAND BOUNDARY I LIVE STAKES
L
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
••` '•• CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION
T ?- TOP OF BANK
--- WE--- EDGE OF-WATER
¦
- C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
-- F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
A
jft- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
Ana
- ---eL- - PROPERTY LINE pgy-u
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB - EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
BOULDER
COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN

----------- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY

PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
SHEET `f OF
3 I
O
r
-\
N m 0
a vmm *4 JlWTM
CA 3 ?
tia a
+
? r
z ? z
z r ------------- ---- -------
rl
? o
0 1 ?
1
i g
z
z O 00 af108M'N IWTTfM 1 \
1 p? m Z 0 1
O \ o?+ C' O H
.o
W O .'?? w ?-4
AO Z
? ? O ? O er
No O
w
?' z
O
IV
n
\ JAMES F. ROBERTS
-'4
• 3F
cda eda a°o tic • • '4 •
•
W y y • _
y N (gyp - • \ ?
CO
c • «• • '
r tis • ?• • i
t13 m
y - b m ?
z 2ct _
0
J
O
p 211
-
C g 00 91
X Z 1
`4 x 0 cm t- 0
t-j
00
a
No ?. C
N
z
0
3

A'
N /

I l
r
k'

?
0111 ?

o eo
o
o ?
Omni
?
oq
4f .n fA
C

C ? r 1 Z
3
o z °---------- -
m -
>
n
to

(A . PROP. rtn
zor

i
4
e > r
>
"i

~ z
rn
y N N
c -L- US l
? rl w

-- o
? z rL
x ------
o o ° v -----------------------------------

-? o c??
`? o
0
0 mZ
_ O

0
C7
0 -3 PROP. n
r 1
'+3 O ?.3 `O
.? C?7

z7 ^ 0

_+
0
co
~ N
00
"? 0
•?
~ ? ma
?p v
N .
y
O 174
Z
N
-l- 09+M 'MIS 3N I IH31YM
r ,
3 ?a /0-00
I N IF A ?
!t s , p
? w
apt
f IF
I I w IF
w
w
cc Kt CAA I / s w w
O z z
rio r w
IF w
C* A
/'. l?
z
? 03
I / IA
v / O s.
?1 1
x
a / ? I a
z 2 /2200
-l- 00+M 'MIS 3NIIH31YA I?
W z
0 w C
a? mz
yzo o r0-
a o m ? ?
x z
?xcn
0
0
z
O
3
O
0
z
O ?
u n
t
n
Y rn
r
IV

? aIE

r ?
z
d
r n
i
1
1
1
1
1
L
1
i
/
1
?n
1
1
1
1 .
1
I
1

Q
i I
s 1
O ? 0 1
? I
I
C z 1
0 C m
0

-? O O
o M z o

Z
r 0
,
-
3 ff w Y
o x
H
o Q En
O C x v
o

N >

N o

_-I- nnJ-)IL
11

_"L- naic it LS 3N I IHOIIYH /n'00
1 ,.
1 ??' ah
I 0 /
1
I
;Vol
I
I
I
1
1 a
a
I`
1 \
I
1
I ?o -?

Q)
3
Q
N

i

/ / !
- ?-- - r - i

+ab cs s RCP
LY

-

4
c4
?

- N
?1
450M CS
4 RCA
O

z

/

i /1-

/ 00
C6

o z
/
/
?-l o ?7
0 C o
[l7 !? / P.
z r)
/ r
ib o

o s v
7, e o

N
?'
z
0
3
O
N
n
r
hn
¦
It
(j? r
r?
m

MATCHLINE STA. 1
1 I
w I y
I
I
T' I
I I
I I
? I
I I
I I
I I
LL

Z \
?y
z
z

I ?l
m
N I
_ I
r
r
t'
Cl)
z z ; N
m /- /

C)
rn Pt

(AA to /
i

? v n
/
O C b +
+
a
\ z 0
iv.
?
x o r O ? j

A

? b
O

\ CD CA
~ v r.r
z
CA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I{
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
MATCHLI
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
?
?
?
`*
N ` ?F
129-00
+
I ? ? I
A-
T
*
?1#00
-+ +
130#00
1 `\
1 ?'

3 3
O O

3 3
C ?
c17 O

f2 O
z
r -i

C
C)

r

m
rrA
>a
zr
9r
-A
O
W
O
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
CII? No

? o
\3
r

0
0
0
a O
- O
W
O
z

?
N
O
C
a

x
?

o
[7

0
0
p
m

M
r
C

z
o v
t17

o

?^ z
it

it
O O Co
IV O O ? I
3
1
O O ?

T
I
3 3 i

N ?
n
>

Y n I
N
L+
?7 ®
o
0
z
z?
? r
z ?

o c

o
0
.?z
x o
;o

? x

o

o

?

o
\

r?
Cj7
O
v
?
z
o

7 ?

a

a

Y

S ?
z
s
CA
O
0
O
N
-L- STA 12&8?? '
«4aoo v?
.
EL- 111 .524
v;.?rnrn
t
i
t
t
t
t
1
z
l
t
t
t
t
t
t
Z
t
t
t
O lO ?CD
N
Q
Q1 r-•?- - -, --,?
TYPE 'A' SILT BA.SIN_j U
1
W/ DSO CSKBARREL 6 R1S
til f / 14-IMPOUNDED WATER LINE
CLN?ON ?. KAT PEELE
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP A
S
r
RA?!P B N
0-4
I? N I 45, 4
B
z
v
y
x s
0;z
z o ..
o z ?: ?' N I
o c
w ?
n CA
w
?-y o 'o
----------- c
z
3 -
CA
O O N
I

N 3 0
m o
o
?
r z

_r* 0
r
m

a?

z m
8 0
>
d r
y ?
0
1
I
r
r
r
r
i
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
t
r
r
r
r
r
r
i
i
v '

O >z rri
y
a 4?1 n =
Q) (31
OC.ON)?
O Co
O
O

l
,
w
w
0
0

10
00
O O
I
c
N3 O
3 ?

1

n o

m

1°' Cpl '
+
i _
i ?
-
U

z°
z
'
r y ?
o
Z
G'1

rn
m
o
m v
O ° rn z i -?
x o o rn
10 ? z Z

CA
o

I
- o
c °
:c cn
-0
o " O

0
00
00 TI z a
O

N
z (1? N
W

3 3
O O

3 F3
C ?
? O

z
?
r

r

r
M

50
0z
>?
Zpr
or
W
. I
I
i
.? I
O ?
I
I
?
?
® O ?
O
O
0
0 0
N
O
I
1
1
C.1 ?
O I
z I

?T

c?
co C ?

o
pr ::?
o
S
W
v m

m ?
z
ni
x p
?

v ?
1
'
00
z

m ?

-?-?._
?
F ---------_----??-` -- --?-- -
?i
C)

I

IV

RIP RAP
Z / I
'
• C -
201

•
•
•

y /

? c
?
20I
m cc
O y
W (A

r
r ?
? g
Z x
300ws
C? 301
v '
z 03
v
fA >
p
'
z
• y y9

z '
f
'
? f
O ni O C m ?
® z
° °
.?
a
o
a ?. z ° k i O

o
W M-
a 44
o \ /
vs
a O
-? -- Z 2 ?
0 1
N a '1
--?-----------
---
-

? O
?. z
N p O .?a
3 3
O
w i
0
C17 O
Y ,
IV
IS
W ?
d o
?z o
?ca
z? T
s
t
i
i
m ai ? o c7
.y T O °o rn
o C17 ,y GI t
Z -4
O
m z
? ? O ?a
U
3 3
0 0
o- o

O
(?
? z
r ?

cn
n

r

z°
z
a?
?W
>?
z?
dr
w
v
0
rn
0
O
? o
N
0
0
C
r*r)
O

v z

d

w o
o
A
o c

o
a m

W O

r
m ?
z
o
?' "0
o

y o

o

co
cn M ro
o
?^ z
N
??t
v?
cep D
co
`= o

0
3
is 3N1'iH'
Z?.p1?1
N _Y CIS
3
n
i
Y ?A
un I a 1
e
T ?
? a
A
r > eAa
YJ /' ' tT
+
1
+
z
c
b
r
l?ri F?
r>

°
o loom t
`
N C a t o

o -1

w z

c

z
+
t
:OF
?n
1
+
1
+ 14N)O
+
+
s
1 = ?.
+ ? l
1
n
.

1 \ s ?
? 1 \\ / 'F rrn
O 1
Is I
? 1 N \ p
N \
+y y?1
1
\k 1 ?` /'
CIO-
7y O IK
? O
y \\ / I
co 14
v
J l? 1 w
?O ///111111 1
t`sa p ?/ / \1 0 l
z i 1 515 ^ 1
1 ? sit \
N \
I N

O cU5i
CIO
aA

o 64
? x
/
? c ca
/ C7
O `n
E" °
o M

c z a
" ° a cz

O
<, U a WD tra
T

Z oa o
1' \
/ i \ C \
?. \\ N yY0p9 1 \\ C/1
\ ?? \
N
\ N \
_ l
2 _ Nk / ?\ 1
d ?• \ 1
_ fk l • \ 1
\ 1
AT. T
C5 -SEE DITCH DETAIL 'A'
SEE PROFILE 3
3
M
\ +85.000 -L-
45.000 (LT) o
y
ROP. R/ C
•A 3
\ 0
EST. 10.0 m TONS
CLASS 'Es-RIP-RAP
W/ 24 m? FILTER FABRIC*
IL cy
`•.
N N N
r 0_ N Z V .
SUMP C
-L- US z
l
N 40 3l 52.7 E w
. _? LL
N N Z !-
i a ?f"- ni NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF -??•-
•^ TRANSPORTATION ?L
•? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Y PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
2 \)GI 777 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH Q
600,
S MOORE /LEE COUNTY
- C RCp 30 PROJECT 8.7560302
C US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825 TO
NORTH OF SR 1182, R-210 B
]NS
' SHEET2q OF-;
5 RA rFR F ARP T C ('
0
3
O -
-?-- OZ+85 L ' M15 3N I IV"
(V ? I
r
cn 3 /0.00 ?
--- ?.

r ? r ?l

r
? ? r
r

r ? I
r 1
r? 1
I
v v o

z - •? r
r
z z r

m '=f r
r
s r
159-00
?
r x I I
z z ? - I I
$
4' N
CA r
I <r=
=o?
r r
J
z n
$ r
> I
e
R
? r 4
$ i
d
v I
I I
I
3
I
r 1 ??
r r

o
C
MATCHLINE S
TA r

. 159"" _L_
z O m
a
o
`3

O C
z b

O
co P=4 0=0

o
z
0
3
0
c?
Y
r
v v
m m
z z
CA
N
z >
z
.? v
m ?
z
0
z

a v •
o °
o ° o e s
?

a
-?

O

a O

con
00

J to Q

It
16-0
G
m?

N ?? I !
,
C?11 I ,? j .
S31M !
?a
!JJ °
SYYx10a't! rn .
1k \
r ? \ ?b
x \

r
r
O t
O s
t
O
F? t
r
N
t A/
-°?
r r x t
CA (V t / w r
C ee t ? ? I70l00
r '? ? r r
r 4 ?
y
0
t
t ? ?
1 r _
t ?^
t r \
t
t r \
O 0." t r
O C r
O C m O t\ "
?o O
O
S CA n r
0 C /71.00
2 r r $
? ? .. a l ? c r \ \
N O
3 3
O
.A N
3
3

O

N
,r
n O
y z
r -i

? r
a
It

? r

z?
x
w
>
r
Q7
O
O
0
O
O
O
z
C "d
;d Ci7
O o a
c ° m z o
W ? o h ?
t7 O ? ? np
r' CD
:r
74
O
O

r

3 3
O O

3 ?
c x
m o

o
?
? z
r .?

n r
r -
?

r
m
zo
ez
>?
zzr

d
o
0

o
'4
c

0
"j
x o

c
?
o°
m
m
m °

°z
o
m v

o
d
Y

o,
on
v O
C
z
? n
O
0
i CA -? Y
a

o
CA
?'
z
w
O
Cl
W
O
cri
0,00 \
n n
o O _ ?3iE ?? ? O
r
r ?
178.00
w zo o?? ??
o ; z 0
171
,o 0o O
? Z
I
?
jl
t
-
O
- fa
R I
'
I 1 , /
Re / /
l t t

I ri Il + f 1
? ? I i t l 1
? / I l 1
I / 11/ I
I 1 \

N
h0
? 1
I /1
P 1
A I ?
1
I o 1

?
vCi
l / I 1
?I11 .1
I ? / I 1

r ? / I

l
r
I
r
/
/ 1
/ (
/ I ?
?
tv tvv , I

? :?
r r
! l
I r,
I l r
?' 1
I \\ ?

?
z
e
? 1
1
r I
1
I rl
r ? I \
I \
t \
Cn

tv c r I ? 0

CA
CAA 1
r.
r I
I
I r ?1

/
??
?\_
--- T IN t r \

y
!A z
n G4
r? ?
1 I
I fix,
?, ! I
I
177.00
? ? `? z° l I I i IV,
O ?
a
m
?? \
Q y = I i ill \
cn p ro r I
o? co
„? ^?
?
1 l
?

0
3
O
N
N 3
n
Y
t?
v ?
z c
r A
x
z ?

Cpl ?' _

---ICL -
N
? O
a
r A
r
z
v
I ?
x C?

o b

n
o

d
?
v
? ?

-3
00
o

C
?
z
v
0
z

E
n
A
m
b
S•
-4O }i 133HS
rl -
s uz-a `zmNS :lo HlH0N
01 SZ86 21S do H1aoN woa3 gn
z0£0951'S Lo3roNd ,
ALNnoo 331 f 3Hoo{N
HONVUS SISAIVNV 1V1NMNOVIAN3 ' ALSO
I INMdO13MC] 103I'Osd , ?; ? M/a • d0ad
SAVMHOIH d0 NOISIAIQ
N0UVlV0dSNVV.L ?x\ (n
dO lN3tuvvd3Q VNn0ldV3 RLHON Ma•ow a° ;
.311308d 33S °
11,4134 HO
HOl1a nIa'31VS
fi£/
,' ;{ '" ;OI88t1
I JZuw5t£ d,
f7 d?lnS 3Sl,4d OI89dd 8311I d zw 9 /M-
33S N N dVSN018W'8'LSS1S3
..:::.:...

?? N N N :.. ..... ..:::..

dOb w o!9p
a l 4130 n o --+- 6Z/ I 9 Z I I I
:.... o dAnS 3SI

j c •? U1 N N N CSI

1

Z?'/ , . ro
ocn t
I 9Z
I I I,4138 -o -..
odrinS 3S33S
8Z/
SM0913 M /M )/M SO wtu090
ioz
I I I,4130
HO1 I0 Wa38 ` - ."-
CIS -'---- dNnS 3SIV3 33S
--
_..
L CA
1311nO 30VN I d8a H838 - a1S o
d
L. i ? ! t 5

13
ID

L
O r

O

z U.
O O
Q? H
Q O
Z
=

7 O
cn C
a
LL N
cc C13
OD
O m
J- CL o -
U- z
00
U,
w> Z coO
0
0
0 g
0
U U (D
O
Z W co Z u
O
w
f-

Q
7
.
to
?
o
n
m
fD
M
N
?
0) W U?

C l0
f
r
-
l M-
CL o 0 0 0 0 W
O

I 2 a? ?
L
-

w

"a
c
O
fr)
N
I-
'-T
?
C0
f0
?
01
h
h
?p(ppp
h
O
C7

0 0 0 0 o o u

d
C

O

O

?
U ? JE
I p
n
O
C L
W
U
m
-y
m c
L
m
U
C
V O O ?
C

U W U E

C U

p. 0 0

W p, p
? H
F--
W
U
Nv?.
0
0
o
o
v r

O

N
1L C
p= to C? O H O O c0 t0
? = 0 0 0 0
o LL

m
Z

C C l0 ?

S

f'
N O ? O

S

N

Cl)
O 1{')

O

0
O

0
S ?

O
?
0 ?

0
M
O
r
O
=
v ?
U O H
G O
C O
O C O
0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0
a?

1-
a ao
° c
m
Q ? X01=
x
a C
Z W C

? c
N
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
? p p ? < ? N f
7 0 N 10 0
LL j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c CV)
a
d a a a a a m a CL w a a a a °- a a

S S S S °f ? S ? ? $ 8 8
in cp m co cD C4 co c3 ? D o ti

J J J J (? J J J J J J J J J O J O J
es pp p p pp '
N
? 8 8 X 8 8 } r °
F
-
o ' + t+D a+O + S + + + + + + ? S } O +
'
N O f7 ? + O N <D O In M V O + cp fD a
p O O ? N cn N ? f9 Q In ? ? (
O (O f''') l? r"
N ? e Q1

O

? p ? N C7 H IA tp h CD 0 ? m IV .0- CD f'-
(n Z O
a:
?
M?
H

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES' ADDRESSES
MALLORY W. HARBOUR 2723 PEPPER MILL RD.
SANFORD NC 27330
2 JAMES F. ROBERTS PO BOX 209,CAMERON NC 283226
3 CLINTON & KAY PEELE 628 BOYS CAMP RD.
CAMERON NC 28326
4 ROBERT C. MARTIN PO BOX 34
CAMERON NC 28326
5 ALBERT& DEBRA HALL PO BOX 148
CAMERON NC 28326
6 RAYMOND & BETTY RIETZEL PO BOX 1
CAMERON NC 28326

7 HELEN HINSON PO BOX 63
CAMERON NC 28326
MARIE "'CKENZ I E PO BOX 1656
PINEHURST NC 28374
8 SAMUEL & KATHY STOUT PE
B
I
I
D
D
R
NG
NES
28327
WH I S
NC
P
9 JAMES & ELLEN ALLEN 5201 JEFFERSON D. HWY.
CAMERON NC 28326
10 ARCHIE BROOKS 5109 JEFFERSON D. HWY.
CAMERON NC 28326
11 LEONARD PRINCE 767 W. ROSSLYN AVE.
- FUL-LERTON - CA. -92632 .
12 CLEO D. BLUE 461 MAIN ST.
VASS NC 28394
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.669003T (R210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET ?6 OF
A-j
C"-,

C
E Ul) co I- co 04
p
f
0
C L v OD - CO 00
U
W
r
_
C
a
E
O
r-
CV)
N

co
O

p
M
= v N
c U

U

a o m y

m C o ti
G i
N
?
? LO
L ? ? G
o co
W W U
H

3 =

U U-
aU t

W

O ?
^
C
co

N
?
C Cr1
a
v O O O
U.

r? L 0 0 0 0 O O O co
M O O O O O O O O
I.L `-'

p)
4)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O r
C V d - C O O O v O G C Oy C O

CC

N C H
O aC
U io m
N L
>
O
O
co
IL c
a
X o 0 6 0 0
W C

y
g
LL C
~ l9
W j

3.1 v
E
y >
? C
N
C Ca
-= co t d'
- w0
w
- c+')
m h
m O
- O
m tO
o trJ
0 N
0 ?
0 cq
co
LL? C C O O O G O C G C O N
>

4)
CD a n n
n 2- s
CL CL o- a. a. CL
U N

U 0 0
° 0
O 0
O O O
O «
n to Ln
r r J r r r r j J Q'
CO > > r. > > > > r-
C } Q' w o w ix Q' a' d m N
o r J
r J
r Q' J
r J
r J
r J
r Q' }
a p 0 0 0 0 0 0 r ' J
O+ to fl- p a O N V O O LO
O
.i N + + N + +
am + +
+ M O
N + N 07 C
'') 'T V CO
? O
CO
+
J
Q
d
6

N

co

V

to

?D

1-

co

CA

',

1 ~

O

PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS
37 MARY C. CHANDLER 8029 EAKES RD.
SANFORD, NC 27330
39 DOWELL EAKES 8024 EAKES RD.
SANFORD, NC 27330
43 JEROME PETTY 4173 JEFFERSON PETTY HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
49 WENDELL L. JOHNSON P.O. BOX 2742
SANFORD, NC 27330
50 PAR NINE INC. 5634 QUAIL RIDGE DR.
C/O JAMES B. PARRISH SANFORD, NC 27330
PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS
14 TALMARS A. KNIGHT RT. 1 BOX 0070
BROADWAY, NC 27505
17 NED W. KELLY, JR. 4717 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
18 JAMES E. BLAKLEY 4728 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
19 JAMES E. BLAKLEY, JR. 312 WESTOVER DRIVE
SANFORD, NC 27330
21 JAMES C. DULL 4622 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
25 DEXTER COX 4508 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
27 HARVEY J. HOLLAND 6324 WILDLIFE RD.
_ SANFORD, NC 27330
30 SEIGMAR MEIER 228 SEAWELL ST.
SANFORD, NC 27330
31 LUTHER D. MADDOX 5709 MOCKINGBIRD LN.
SANFORD, NC 27330
34 CENTRAL CAROLINA JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
AVIATION, INC. SANFORD, NC 27330
c
z
O
F' ? -' ca 3 0 ?' ? z
ap?a-c F°?
z F z
rK
C c:. p c ^'
F p U F 0 o
D O tT.
z
ti
U
I I. ?
I it ? ??Oa. ?+\
d y)
I H
W
` I I II v. ? z
I I v ,\ ? a N
0 C6 0 .1d
0
z za zw
p G m c u
•
g ? ?n
YJ ? ?
W
a ~
x 3 1
/ W o rI I LLJI i
Ulf I I I
/ ? III OF I
car / I °
/ r O
O I
I
I

a
o

I? I
IS I
I? I
I? I
I
I I
I? I
II I
it I

• 'H I
I

WI/

r- - ?

D _
z
e

a N
z z? z
?
F

z

z?
C a G
p i U

Q?oQ R
to 5 ?
5 ao / /
/ / 81 ??E / . / Pr
/. / / SR 0 ? ?{St?
/ / / / \ Y W O
/ ? \ o J M
\ W
\ V < O
\ \ O O
\ Q
d \ \ Z
\
Y \P^?
O \
I ? \
W
Q
r..
L301 `
3p1 \301
N
W
M J
O
0 0.
., O
\ u

z c
c
5 ..

@
F
cn
Q

o ^c:`

? ? ?
O
z " z bo
Ems- O OU 9 C ?O

O
w
j E':
06 cn
E-' 0 . V p o
0 o
w > G w allv
u a, r d r
?z
J
U

Z O
O
_
Z J
y ?
O v C
Z
O
D ? ?
9
N
C
W
F
t
a
U
e

ci I
1 I
x I
s
f v
I
l

I U?
I?
I ? I
I p'
I?
II z
e
U
E ?
N
0
0
r ?
II - F z
a o
F

U
? z
< ?i
?. ]
co . ?. a
? tycl? V U
a ?
°
zz z z z
c o` c
?
v
,

W
O W
? J
W
3
O
O
H I
? I
8)M . ?
Z
N =
M ?
Oa I
u
s
a
3 I
r I 1
o ?
1
Ii

J
r-`
?
N U

b O
? O

iq
to _ F o
I.. ? y a N
z
W ? O
Z ca
p to U
•
• s
•
z
o
o
? "' ? Uc '~ Gt7
E" ? OU ? p; O ? O
00
U -4
N I '
°' T U
o to - ? ?
s I?
CL t
CL ac
I
I
?I
/ I
o _
c.i
z F I I
0 c
C ? I
a
> F
< < to
4 ? I c
< O a N
V
E., z
m
z
z z? zm
p D vi DU
s •
•

?I
i

•
•
•
?I

ITEM
STREAM NAME
DRAINAGE AREA (DA)
CHANNEL SLOPE (S)
WIDTH (Wbkf)
BANKFUL
MEAN DEPTH (dbkf)
gANKFUL X-SECTION AREA
WIDTH/DEPTH kRAT10
DEPTH (d mbkf)
Maximum
wInTH Flood-Prone Are
EXISTN
STREAM
crib to Little
crone creek
76 ha
I.I
1.7m - VAR.
0.2m
0.33m 2 - V AR.
8 5 - VAR.
0.31m
45m
26.5 - V AR.
sand
-HANNEL MATERIALS: 050
SINUOSITY (K)
MEANDERS:
AVG. LENGTH
qVG. AMPLITUDE
AVG. RADIUS
DISCHARGES:
0 BANKFULL
02
010
VELOCITY:
V BANKF
V2
V10
CATION
I.I - VAR.
VAR.
VAR
VAR.
RE NCE PROPOSED
RELOCATION
STREAM

tor. to Little
Tribu Tributary to Little
crone creeK
creek
crone
76 ha
76 ha
p.9'/.
1.1
1.8m
1.7 m
0.18m
0.2m
p.36m 2
2
0.33m
10
8.5
0.3m
0.31m
15m
45m
8.3
26.5 sand
sand

1.1 1.2
0.2 cros
1.7 cros
3.1 cros

14.Om
13.8m
2.6m
2.6m
5.0m
5.1m
0.2 Oros
1.7 cros
3.1 cros
0.3 curs
1.7 cros
3.1 cros
!0.3580 m/s
m/s
1.01 m / s
E5 _
0.56 m/s
0.56 m/s 0.6? m/s
0.61 m/s
0.71 m/s - -
0.71 m/s ES .
D5/E5
CLASSIFI THROUGH MOST OF
TREAM IS BR AIDE HIGHLY VARIABLE-
S
? - EXISTING
ITS LENGTH. SOME DATA IS
NATURAL CHANNEL.
DESIGN DATA
SITES 4&5
? TION I
N C. DEPT. OF TRANSpORT?b 1
OF fIIGIMA-YS
DIVISIOEE COUNTY
PROJECT: S.T560302
SR 1182 TO SR 1180
US 1 FROM OF SANFORD
SOUTH
JUNE 1999
1998 REVISED
AN
SHEET OF
POOL SECTION (B -B)
(Not to Scale)
M ItAf
FLOODPRONE BANKFULL CHANNEL- = 195m-??-FLOODPRONE
TERRACE` I TERRACE`
WIDTH VARIES i WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLANS)
PROPOSED R/W (SEE PLANS) DEPTH VARIES
DEPTH VARIES LOW FLOW (SEE PLANS)
ISm ISEE (PLANS) I CHANNEL
NATURAL ? rI f_ SL
GRCUNO 2 GRADE POINT 1 fdY
f2J
i
OJ5m
03m
OJSm \a
54 O'6m
OJSm
06m -?=
POOL DEPTH ' ` - NOTE. STABILIZE BANKFULL CHANNEL BANKS
OJ51" DEEPER AND FLOODPRONE TERRACE WITH
THAN GRADE POINT. SODDING AND NATIVE VEGETATION.
TOWARDS OUTSIDE
OF MEANDER BEND. BED MATERIAL OF LOW FLOW CHANNEL
SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SOILS.
POOL PROFILE
CHANNEL BED (Not to Scale)
i--- POOL TO BE EXCAVATED
zm am
SEE PLAN VIEW FOR POOL SPACING
SITES 4 & 5
NATURAL -CHANNEL
DESIGN DETAILS
RIFFLE SECTION (A -A)
(Not to Scale)
(?- FLOODPRONE-?? BANKFULL CHANNEL- = IBm ?1-?- FLOODPRONE BERM '
TERRACE- TERRACE- Ism
WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLANS) (WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLWS)
PROPOSED R/W ( DEPTH VARIES DEPTH VARIES
(SEE PLANS) I? LOW FLOW -? (SEE PLANS)
Ism -?? I CHANNEL
NAT!/RAL ? 12d VpQE
GROfINO ?y { /-GRADE Po/NT Z4
` 0.3m r oism
17
oism
?+- D&n -?
I+-Ohm -?
- NOTE: STABILIZE BANKFULL CHANNEL BANKS
AND FLOODPRONE TERRACE WITH
SODDING AND NATIVE VEGETATION.
BED MATERIAL OF LOW FLOW CHANNEL
SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SOILS.
A-A: RIFFLE SECTION
B=B: POOL SECTION
(Not to Scale)
r]
? W Q-
SITES 4 & 5
NATURAL CHANNEL
DESIGN DETAILS
Q ? Q-

i ?
0 C)
zm
x
p o rrnn
--i<
r>
C Z za
C7 O °z
? N

n
O a
o

cn C?.,

n

® N
O

O

?
° o
c
a -
3 m
ry ry ?•

vn v?

tp > C4
C
> o
H
O
z
N
O
a ?
z z
n
m ? a v
G C o

w a4
0
z z o
"TI

z
° oo a ? z?

C7 n ? ?
°
z

N
A C
t p
N ?O
O R`7
N
O
O
w
a
N 5 SHEET t l OF Z
MATCN LINE SITE
r
Z
v I 1 w
I 1 0 /
II 1 II :? ? 1 ` N
1 / N
1©
3 ? ?H II : 1 "' 1 a ?
M w
O ?'9 I Q 1 nix
N ?1
? I
r
tz
'Z
y ?
Z ~ 0 h
O ` C
b
o
a
A
o
m z o

0 0 `n n
A

z

Cr1 ~
,; r 0
z

0
O?
m

A

b

Z

e
?

• . • MATCH LINE SITE 4 SHEET 10 OF .ZS
• JEA- Rn -
ERIS
o o o IF
c
y m ?CA y
o? I I I
x -i > I I
Z ccn? > z 1 I K-?
m o m I. I
° z
Z
;
?,? I
C
r*'r-c
I m
I mn
1 ( °m > A
I >Z
/ I (A v
d O mo D
x / - ? , ° NO
ZI ( T ? Z°x
` N
"I w
EO 8\\N
- ? ? 1 w I
00 OA
N 1? * r o
O ? I ? r g I
? 3 ? I 1 / m
II
r- ? 111
:.. / t
II
MATCH LINE SITE 5 SHEET IZ OF 2S
? c O ? ? C m
0
$
c31 0; ° Y
Z
° oo z
0
z ° o '?
m
• X
O m
n
0
nv yv ?t;
r-7 z az z z I Y I „
> j M a _ a n CD
cn to rn =j W I ' ^ I *Siam
x
> M
Ok I I I,
Z z ?' z I I •
a i' I•• -K-
° z -
-- y XJ a ?.
m m
Z I m
_ m K-
r
IE z
:? •O.
I : I K- ./
Z
I
I M>
mD
N mr
M-0 °x
mD
(V °°o -'z
O Mr- D
I --4 ?m
3 i > Nr
cn
C) I m
? N
m ? _ I Z
I
I
I I ?
:I N
-0 m
(n Z I oom
zz
rb I I
:7 -- /. .J (7 D
11? N,
I m i I r
? C ? ? Cnr1 r?yr "O1'? I i 7F I
N C v' o o Z y I. l ; I w ?: T umc UL
1'7 NO a
° ?o a -Oro -- --
???
Z o ••? MATCH LINE SITE 5 SHEET { 1 OF
z
• I
I
I, I ? N
• • n
I: O
N I
r W p?? G? ? I ? i r
ao zoo ?z z
n r n
N Ca y m y
.Z.
m rA VJ 1 tL
Q g' Z .a .. I 15 '4 :4 > _ •
Z vain yx Z I ? ?• ??,
> I A
... I ,? 9 01ts
I ?
- I
I A I
X
I A
• 9
\ I a
I t s I
. IX I
No ? IZ
n i? I
I I ?
i I
?I
I
?z z?
o a
?• w
p o ? "? ? o I ? o
z ? o •c a I I o
o
,? z
_. W
Qo O
N N
N N ?
3 3 co -? I
O O
O -
N OD
O
C C ? .
70
n -
w ?-
u °
? Z N ?-
O
a?
x9as rn
o °
o
r
p ?? G
i
z
f-A ° Nam
0
OQ? ? ?' ? m ZOr1
? n
? 'A O ? a C1 ? ,ti, No ?
O
Cs7 r w C d
VX a
C''O "'4 O = N N
Z C ,?,, o cn ,,,? p N
N N
O
I-
0
n
Z
O
-l
m
r I , I I
r I I I
? ?y I I
y I I I
} ? I s
9 I
I ! I I`
I I I I I ?
1 I i I L. ? ? ?\
o
0
m
I I
I
?I
1
9
?r
8

I s
m
m
ca rm
s
r
K

rn
m
N
? N
0
c
I
I ?
I
y rtlz

?®
=l
N
Cn
I ?
.. I
• , o
C1 m m I\ / /
to
? I WLB _
a
m o c
v x r
v i - ,?-- -
f/J n • m
L4 O
r
N
• r
I m
n I""
p
' fE 03
Z cn ^0 n
.. p
a)
'C r?7 6 7? C O O N V ? \\\
r Z ? Z Z \
tv NQ
C p cn ? ,? \
r r? \
z
3 ? SS
wt\ \
\ t
\\C3
s im f
a
0
\ \ r
\ J
O J
W?
\ \ W
01 3c
C ;
\ ` a
\ I I
v 71,
I I
F
I I o
Q N I
K
O ? I f
3
H ' I
d
?
o
N

O
1A?1 O
_ o
- --z
J
a N
z z
U
z zm
0 0
# #

PROPOSE'
- JL VERT
PROPOSED B0v

?
? Al- ?
s>
WETLAND

PE CULVERT
WL PROPOSED PI
'
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND 12'-48
PIPES
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
STRUCTURES) 54, PIPES
& ABOVE
S FILL IN EXISTNG
yZyj DSURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
D F IOLLE IN TW E PLDA AB Y
00
gm? DE TNOES EXCAVATION
I DEFT LE N SUR ACE Y
® WATER
• DENOTES CL EAR H NIZED
. .
DITCH
FLOW DIRECTION
TlB____ TOP OF BANK
WE- - EDGE OF WATER
C - PROP. LIMIT -OF CUT
__F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
NO- - NATURAL GROUND
--PL-- PROPERTY LINE
_E TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
-TOE - TEMEASEMENTGE
_ - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
-POE- EASEMENT
-_EAB- ' EXISANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB--' EXIST PLANT BOUNDARYD
WATER SURFACE
• 1 SINGLE TREE
v WOODS LINE
¦ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
5 OR PARCEL ER
IF
AVAILABLE
X X X X X LIVE STAKES
"BOULDER
COIR FIBER ROLLS
TANSFORTr?TION

F HIGHWAYS
IGHWAYS
OUNTY
550302 (R"0210C)
F
R 1182 TO SR 1180
OF S kNFORD
REVISED JUNE 199

2 57
F
In
O
3
O

Q) MATCH LINE

t N

O
- 40+00
N
w
V

co

W

N ?
_N
co ?o t
O
H
r
N
cc$ I m

s0+00 (A
Q Z
??4 Q 1
p ? ?
+ O

N M

0
III ? o
-Ni N I

C-4

z
U c N \
' `I? `V
Z a o +
t17 ?,
m ._
a
o
0
00 o
Z
a 0
tN ? ? ? r O ? p

? C O a N n 0 ?
a ? z ? z
z
`
c
a
z c
t

-' x o
z

VI
O
3
O
r
c?
O I
O
V: I y ?
7 3 4 0
N O-
D !n +
.o y W
? v
:0 Cn
_ ? gay
N
CD
Cl? ' cell
1?p?
N
N
- - 1 20+00
D ?
W I
- D
m
S.
I N
?r
0
L
N
w
CD
V1
MATCH LINE Sta. 35 + 43
w
m
Z
O
m
0
0
co
0
th
A
D
T 1'
A r
OD
?I
Y- 1 1 o^ew ` e Uuncan 6, 1 y ®?
- -j 12 121 ii anf0rd+ I' I to lybeate Sorlnas,
Mra alf GI d 7 ) 1
?? Ktpl,na 71 •I
iramwsy Broadway 101' 1 ` 10 H„
)Fow
L E E 87 Izt " Buie:
arkwood f Lemon Mamers -+ ' Creed r Co tt1
22 t 10 Sonnas L1llin9lon O d'-
O R is 7w,nn E 22
H?A R 16 0
ensoSol n
tCarlnaae 7 e I 014,18 11 7 ;,, 't7 SS Jul
\
7 1 7 a1naoe r 2 'o ./? *7 j 7
H-11 Crest • 1 lZ mewew
Erwl O • ?:
WM Den 7
-akes 1 22 Ines S 10 2 1 Is Bunnle7el` 1 U fl ?)I 2,2
.astwood ass'Johnionvo e 1 "Our Drrnas 10 ' 17 1
82
1 , ?, •` kerrew 7 7 Lmde - •'..meo• S
? • 9? 1 sa.Mre?..e
i • 2 .I RIU'?' I7 ?`' God
Ma y ant ester
Ursts 00t Pine $_: "' 401 MCOn ,
• $p n t • to wade E2 13
Aber dee • O SM ?? - r of?
U' M ?7
bluff A Nf
t
I 7118 $ ? Piney Green
2 ? ca u3
Hna°ts ! - ti• *1
S A M
? M 1 5 S 1 .,
287,
Scale of Miles
' 0 S 70 20 30
0 10 .r, .? 40 e8
Sole of Kilometers
qt1/ r !1L ? 15 c )rni
.?
::.
.3 ' HanL+oY a 79 All
J
1]01 ! + 5 9 Olt - L
150-- 1
to :° ']sl s / 4> ?? 1
1>ft
113. ( 7141 f i I , ,
NU21
S 1441 ?.2.? Ile t. rd ?
s
`i a c,

?
2
\?c n 1114
I,N P77 -
ti
' 1.7 37
1
47 zn 34

I
{)/
1 17x1
y
?
/
/`
/Y`I
yA{

t 1 I'Ilsa
.2
Jl

R
y
{[
n 1'-
y J
a
^ ' a -. .y It A7
CI06
1 cf 117. jlaa Y ' r
13
,..
Sol
5 ^
S

-

, Is
, ttaa

Y
_
116. 35

..
I I
v J1?!
11
?O IIN
,
1116
' or Hip 1117 4 a
Little '/ 1177 Jll1 ;.
:.1
.A ,a a li; t.7
:•
1757 II63 V
-0 I ?t
Junipe,
u S Ils
118 JJt7 ,
I Ito
11a2t 1181
U e
dfa
1 J I
s V
?
1.2 1171
1178 ?.
JJU

? j
?
?
-
- 1112
? n.tl .e
jjg
It" •
\` tIN
.e
7.
LIM
?
.
e
Il'i 1? 1111 •?
i
lly,
'
J' J It" ]S'30• `r
1187 /
73'30' '
< y? a
I .? na7j
w
l
fit, al lilt 1
!N.L I
N. C. DEPT. OF TR:=.N il"I' I; FA 1 IO
DIVISIONT O }-1C;}-I1VAYS

' .o
. .
11177

1, T' - "OUNTY
PROJECT- 8•T:7h1)502 (1,,-0210C'?
*'S I FROM SR 1182 TO SR 1180
'
•
1 1 TH OF :>:1.:I
(33Zll
S'C7L
1 0
° °' ' "Kl SHEET I OF Z5
D.S M •b K

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
?FAMES
ADDRESSES
1 JACK C. MAXWELL
14 OSSIE B. KELLY
15 WADE GODFREY
16 LARRY GODFREY
17 CSX RAILROAD
18 LINDA LEE JUSTICE
19 CURTIS SMITH
20 CLARENCE INGRAM
21 ROBERT COLLINS
PO E-lX 2145
SANFORD NC 27330
8128 CEDAR LANE
SANFORD NC 27330
738 ARDMORE DR.
DEARBOURN HEIGHT. MI 48127
6427 ROCK FORK CH.
SANFORD NC 27330
500 WATER ST.
JACKSONVILLE. FL 32202
1720 CHRISTINE LANE
CAMERON NC 28326
PO BOX 321
VASS NC 28394
PO BOX 534
VASS. NC 28394
6439 ROCKY FORK RD
SANFORD NC 27330
22 JAMES ROUSE PO BOX 2115
SANFORD NC 27330
23 LILA R. DOUGLAS PO BOX 496
SANFORD NC 27330
_¦
Dloyoy
10
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
(Web page - htip•//www saw usace gM.miUwetlands/regtour.htm)
Action ID No. 199300570
April 6, 2001
PUBLIC NOTICE
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT),
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH
CAROLINA 27699-1548, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO
DISCHARGE DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY ON NEW LOCATION FROM
APPROXIMATELY CAMP EASTER ROAD (SR 1853)/AIKEN ROAD (SR 2175) IN MOORE
COUNTY TO WILD LIFE ROAD (SR 1180) IN LEE COUNTY, TIP PROJECT R-210ABC,
STATE PROJECT NO. 8.T560302.
Project History:
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) describing various alternatives to the project as well as the expected impacts to the human
and natural environment was completed on December 1, 1995 and the FHWA Record of
Decision (ROD) was signed on March 21, 1996. The Corps of Engineers concurred with the
proposed alternative by letter dated May 4, 1993. The FEIS and ROD include studies that
investigated impacts to natural systems and protected species for the project. A permit
application for the proposed project was submitted by NCDOT on February 19, 2001.
Project Description:
The following description of work is taken from data provided by the applicant. The North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to construct a four lane divided
highway on new location from approximately Camp Easter Road (SR 1853)/Aiken Road (SR
2175) in Moore County to Wild Life Road (SR 2175) in Lee County. The proposed project will
be a four-lane roadway with a 46-foot median and includes new bridges over the Little River,
Crane Creek, and an unnamed tributary to Little Crane Creek. The total project length is 12.8
miles long. In response to review agency comments, the length of the proposed bridge over Little
River was extended from 393 feet to 1308 feet. This design modification will increase the bridge
construction costs and decrease the wetland impacts at this site by 2.81 acres. The proposed
construction method for each proposed bridge utilizes work mats placed in wetlands for
construction equipment access.

2
According to the to information provided by the applicant, TIP Project R-210ABC consists
of three parts. The proposed project, TIP Project R-21 OA, extends from US 1 from SR 1853/SR
2175 at Lakeview to northeast of SR 1825 (Cranes Creek Road). The TIP Project R-210B
extends from northeast of SR 1825 to north of SR 1182 (Cedar Lane Road). TIP Project R-210C
extends from north of SR 1182 to US land south of SR 1180 located south of Sanford. All of
these projects are described in the FEIS and ROD.
According to information provided by the applicant, the purpose of the project is to
improve safety and to provide additional capacity for U.S. 1 from the existing four lanes south of
Secondary Road (S.R.) 1853 at Lakeview to the existing four lanes at S.R. 1180 south of
Sanford, North Carolina, in Moore and Lee counties. In addition, these improvements will aid in
the fulfillment of statewide plans for a four-lane major arterial facility connecting the northern
state line with the southern state line in the midportion of North Carolina.
The project area is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Little River is the main
tributary in the project area. The streams that will be crossed by the proposed project include
Little River, Nancy Dyer Branch, Little Juniper Creek, and several unnamed tributaries
associated with Little River, Crane Creek, Little Crane Creek, and Juniper Creek.
Construction of the proposed project will permanently impact 41.50 acres of wetlands and
approximately 4,880 feet of jurisdictional stream. Except for 0.42 acres of wetland impacts at
Wetland Site 4 in Section B, all permanent wetland impacts are riverine. In addition, the
proposed project will impact ten farm ponds. Dominant vegetation includes loblolly pine, (P.
taeda), pond pine Pinus serotina), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer
rubrum), and tulip poplar (Lirieodendron tulipifera). Permanent wetland impacts for the
proposed project are summarized below:
Table (1). Permanent Wetland Impacts.
Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater Forest Linear Seep Wet Flat Ephemeral Wetland Total
R210A 12.47 4.21 6.15 22.83
R210B 10.06 0.05 0.42 10.53
R210C 0.05 8.07 8.12
Total 12.47 4.26 24.28 0.05 0.42 41.48
Note: Above impacts include fill, excavation and mechanized clearing.
The NCDOT classified, in its permit application, each wetland site according to the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service Wetland Classification (Cowardin, 1979) system and the North
Carolina Department of Environmental, Health, and Natural Resources "Field Guide to North
Carolina Wetlands". A linear seep classification was added by NCDOT to represent wetlands
that are either a seep or headwater forest classification and use groundwater seeps as its main
source of hydrology. The wetland classifications and wetland and stream impacts for each
wetland site are provided in the NCDOT permit application and are attached to this public notice.
4
The decision, whether to issue a permit, will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public
interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts that the proposed activity may have on the public
interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors that become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits that may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions
under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore decided by the outcome of the general
balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and use
of important resources. All factors that may be relevant to the proposal must be considered
including the cumulative effects of it. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics,
general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards
and flood plain values (according to Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion
and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety,
food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general,
the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill
materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be
authorized would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be
granted unless the District Engineer decides that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties to consider and evaluate the
impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to decide whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To
make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to decide the need for a public hearing and to decide the
public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers whether the proposed
activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The
application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for
certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such
materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
3
In order to compensate for the unavoidable 41.5 acres of wetland impacts associated with
this project, NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory mitigation as follows: (1) utilize 4.7
acres of onsite wetland, mitigation and 8.4 acres of on-site wetland preservation at Little River to
compensate for the 4.7 acres of wetland impact at Little River; (2) for the remaining 36.8 acres of
wetland impacts, the NCDOT proposes to preserve the Sandhills Area Land Trust (SALT)
mitigation site. This 327-acre mitigation site is located near Lobelia and borders the Little River.
In addition, the NCDOT proposes to restore 49 acres of wetlands as described in the report
entitled "Wetland Mitigation Plan - SALT Mitigation Site" dated August 16, 2000. This plan
also includes 10 acres of upland long leaf pine restoration and planting of approximately 82 acres
of native vegetation as described in the mitigation plan.
In order to compensate for the unavoidable 4,880 feet of stream impacts associated with
this project, NCDOT proposes to utilize the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(WRP) to provide 9,760 feet of compensatory stream mitigation.
Preliminary design plans, FHWA FEIS, and the mitigation plan are available for review at
the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office of the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers, 69
Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28402.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to decide the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the
coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor
will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
decided the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public. hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein, and this site is not registered property or property listed as being
eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register is the extent of
cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the
presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed
activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
6
TABLE 3. US 1 Wetland Communities, Quality Analysis, and Total
Impacts
Site Cowardin NCDENR - DWQ DWQ Acres
Classifica Classificati on Rating Impacte
tion d
Section A
1 PF01E Bottomland hardwood forest 92 4.71
(Little River)
2 PF01C Linear Seep 35 0.36
3 PF01C Bottomland hardwood forest 87 3.16
4 PF01C Headwater Forest 39 0.62
5* PF01C Linear Seep 23 0.02
6 PSS1D Linear Seep 30 1.19
7 PSS1D Linear Seep 15 0.06
8 PF01C Headwater Forest 40 0.97
9 PF01E Bottomland hardwood forest 31 0.21
10 PF01E Bottomland hardwood forest 78 2.84
ll* PSS1C Headwater Forest 28 1.41
12 PF01C Linear Seep 15 0.28
13 PF01C Linear Seep 15 0.09
14 PF01C Linear Seep 15 0.15
14a* PSS1D Headwater Forest 36 0.64
15* PF01C Linear Seep 43 0.21
16 PF01C Linear Seep 43 0.75
17 PF01C Linear Seep 24 0.38
18 PF01C Headwater Forest 30 0.40
18a* PF02C Linear Seep 37 0.52
18b* PF02C Linear Seep 25 0.32
19 PF01C Bottomland hardwood forest 39 0.06
(Crane Ck.)
20 PF01C Bottomland hardwood forest 39 0.15
(Crane Ck.)
21 PF01C Bottomland hardwood forest 73 1.34
(Crane Ck.)
22 PFO1D Linear Seep 30 0.82
22a* PF02C Headwater Forest 42 0.17
23 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.32
25 PF01C Linear Seep 43 0.68
SUBTOTAL 22.8
3
Section B
1 PF01C Wet Flat 19 0.05
2 PEM1E Linear Seep 20 0.56
3 PF02C Linear Seep 41 0.50
4 PFOlE Ephemeral wetland 28 0.42
6 PF02C Linear Seep 53 1.26
7 PF01C Linear Seep 35 1.07
8 PF01C Linear Seep 42 1.26
9 PEM1E Linear Seep 64 0.80
10 PF01C Linear Seep 64 1.01
11 PF01C Linear Seep 15 0.08
5
All persons wanting to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ),1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621, Attention:
Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mr. Dave Timpy, until 4:00 p.m., May 6, 2001.
8
TABLE 4. US 1 Relocation - stream impacts
Sit Water Body Channel Channel Proposed Acres
e Impact Replaced Mitigatio Impacte
(linear (linear n* d
feet) feet) (linear
feet)
Section A
1 UT to Little River 341 0 682 0
5 UT to Little River 7 0 14 0
10 UT to Little River 574 174 574 0
12 UT to Crane Creek 138 0 276 0
13 UT to Crane Creek 26 0 52 0
14 UT to Crane Creek 39 0 78 0
15 UT to Crane Creek 256 0 512 0
16 UT to Crane Creek 600 0 1200 0
17 UT to Crane Creek/Farm 223 0 446 5.83
Pond
19 UT to Crane Creek 259 0 518 0
21 UT to Crane Creek 223 0 446 0
22 UT to Crane Creek 43 0 86 0
24 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.12
SUBTOTAL 2729 174 4884 6.95
Section B
1 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.31
2 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.91
4 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.12
5 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.09
6 Nancy Dyer Branch 213 0 426 0
9 UT to Little Crane 167. 0 334 0
Creek
12 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.09
14 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.57
15 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.59
SUBTOTAL 380 0 760 6.68
Sect ion C
3 Farm Pond/ 282 0 564 0.20
UT to Little Crane
Creek
4 UT to Little Crane 472 449 472 0
Creek
5 UT to Little Crane 646 531 646 0
Creek
6 UT to Little Crane 276 0 552 0
Creek
9 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.67
10 Little Juniper Creek 39 0 .78 0
11 UT to Little Juniper 56 0 112 0
Creek
SUBTOTAL 1771 980 2424 0.87
TOTALS 4880 1154 8068 14.50
* - A 2:1 multiplier was applied to each impact site, except for those with on-site reiocanons

12* PF01C Linear Seep 26 0.43
13 PF02C Linear Seep 28 0.62
14 PF01C Linear Seep 51 1.28
15 PF01C Linear Seep 29 0.51
16 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.48
17 PF01C Linear Seep 19 0.20
SUBTOTAL 10.5
3
Section C
1 PEM1C Linear Seep 36 0.37
2 PEM1C Linear Seep 23 1.83
3 PF02C Linear Seep 46 0.49
4 PF01C Linear Seep 76 1.20
5 PF01C Linear Seep 76 2.77
6 PF01C Linear Seep 37 0.27
7 PF01C Linear Seep 29 0.79
8 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.18
10* PF01C Linear Seep 23 0.10
11* PF01C Linear Seep 23 0.07
12* PF01C Headwater Forest 46 0.05
SUBTOTAL 8.12
TOTAL 41.48
* - Indicate additional impact sites due to slight shifts in the roadway, incomplete mapping,
or not identified during the original assessment.
SITE MAP
SCSI L E
O ,SLID /0110M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
/ : 2_s; ODD
8.T560302
R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
,+
SHEET Z OF J 48 NOVEMEBER 1997

airo.e 9
wn?nnr .}
ins ]3
c
S V?IIa(e
M O N DD
Sondl.dl, Rec. •rea
xrdel Marstoy
atcon
S
s
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 ZO 30
0 10 20 30 ..__a0, 43
1 Scale of Kilometers
131
• ?w.yo.
t O t Z 3 4 MILES
-JM
SGAi-E
a, '1.

*o
>e,r
X193
>o,r 19?
laa.,
nl I
9
er
\\C olat s `
V/ClNITY MAP
i
ILI
ILI
SITE MAP
c
SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p rU4, ?pvoM DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
2: U PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. i
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIE•W TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET -3 OF 58 NOVEMEBER 1997
j 7

J

a

'fA OJECT'- -?
69003T,
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO ScmA
VICINITY
MAPS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET I OF 3'T

MATCHLINE SITE MAP 2

SITE VIII
-Y
NC 24 / 27
C < I 32 -YB-
I NC 4 /NC 27
SITE VII
SITE VI

SITE V
GOON' i
i

SITE IV
_ ? N %s fi,s
u"°' 005j
SITE III
BOA ? o
? SITE XI
SITE II,

__SITE
-L- JIA. 781-YV.VVV L.G. IK-LIVAI =
-L- STA. 98 + 90.000 L.A. (R-21.013)
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 6.569003T

?v.99cy Ro
40
/ A

?w
TO SOUTHERN PINES
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US I FORM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET ?- OF 3 ? 8 / 2 / 99
Od
O
SITE XIV -----"
PINE FOREST RE
(SR 1173)
SITE XIII
SITE XII
LEE COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY .

SITE Xvlz
d
.Z-------SITE X
f?-9
N

? t
SITE I
MATCHLINE SITE MAP 1
SITE MAP ? 2
-L- STA. 179+45.047 L.B. (R-2108)
SITE XV
? SITE XVI
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182.
SHEET 3 OF 3+ 8/2199
PIC
0 10 ,r. 40
Scale of Kilometers
{
59 76
•- a7 R
471, J50" 1'J ?? Y •.?` i,. -? _ •L
I Q: 1]0• ?' ' •1 ralllrwer y
f: /,0 `o ..242. .? 3 ?.l ..` 92 •;6.
I l.24t 1241
142 .f ? } 1 ??, I a
Ile
1423 : ti 1.p Fr:J
1242 '
?1.2. It .+ . y L11
I e.
1241 •? `ins \ L !0 MIL Itas 11 7 « _
1 P7 • v 2 pub 114237
: 1242 47 :
+ 1Frs 343
FRO '? - l.?wltf[?? . C I O6 a 110 tt.
e% I 117t a
1
1.2 1 S `7 .1l2 f "It C I I
- __. 7 _ . 35.
Ilw ,.. ? V llL+ 171{ 1 - ?
?. Mil 11l2 a 4'° J112 M ` I
.t•?t \ F:ts1t I,n PA
3.8 u?• Ida.
-FL 1 % .s
1) ? ? ?? ? a •na ? f n
t ' 1 1 1
V nu. nos j S nn ?i4 1 v 1112 /uiliprr /
fly& 12.
• J
11{)
G IJ 11L0? 6 IIiJI .6
O ? Jll/ ? v' 1) A ?
?I 'a IIN •:.'•i
Y ?\ - I1? u?s.a y 16 1146 •;?Lug !I
v n).
73'20' i .p 1 { 170
,Ial /' 13'30'
JIM
'lot
?I \ ?4sJr N. C. I?E3?T.OI
/10
?O? ? 11)1 / i
DIVISION OF HI
ltl), , 4,T'F. ,'OU TY
P'ROJEC'T: 8-T-560502 (R-021 0(",?•bKr`h`'3•d•S \ i 11"; I -l:o ? SR 1182.T.1., 118f)
0 I ZKn b• KM
2 3 a ,uIFS
03 SO L "r" i7 Ol • ?.
a. 1" ORD
0 I sutF
D.8 KM 1.6 JCM { MME,F 2-5
£b+ S£ 'DIS 3Nll H:)iVW
n
1 N
1 W N
Y l'
O ?
0
O
t
0

NT
0
N
i
m
13
W M
00+OL m
N
I -j
- Y., z ? to
z
O
? c
c+
_

Q o f y Z

z ?
r z
?
W r
,
../
M
?
C!1 ??i
F" O E: W O
cn O
~
A c
n V O O

2 Z

t
-N
Rio

Ln
h
a
U - +
LU M y a
-,

O + to
Q

CL ' Q
a O ri
z V ' n
I. O
m
w

O
E
O
Ln

ce-
O

N

?
al
p
?
V/ III

W D
O + ? -
One.
CL o,
In

Z
O
N I
oo+OS
r
W O I
r-
J
? ^
?j N
LAO
a
00+or
II
m
5
t! °o 0
oo. °o o°
+ p0
G +0
e h ao
N WA
D
j V) N
? I I
J J J
11774,
z
o

d _
CIO

r" M ? VJ '

F r
O 0
U SD
F ~
C 4 rq
O>r
,
? .,
V O
C
0

?n •? U ?
O F
M
w j O C O.coF
C a ? W
U zX
z ?

/N A
^

co -
Ff
_4)

N ti
cn ?
3NIl HXVW
L:a
Q
0
0
0
0
Lnj

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
yd wP°pj+
010404
February 19, 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
'w.:....,ry 0..
ISS F-c
-Y"
??J 1
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Office FILE COPY
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. David Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
MAR 1 9I 1o,i
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR US 1 FROM NORTH OF
LAKEVIEW TO SOUTH OF SANFORD, MOORE/LEE COUNTIES,
TIP NO. R-210.
Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the subject project.
The proposed roadway is a four-lane divided freeway tying into the existing US 1 four-
lane facility south of Camp Easter Road (SR 1853)/ Aiken Road (SR 2175) in Moore
County to Wild Life Road (SR 1180) in Lee County. Full control of access will be
maintained. The 12.8 mile freeway will be on new location, but parallels existing US 1
corridor for the last 2.6 miles of section C. An analysis of various alternatives and the
explanation of the preferred alternative is detailed in the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) signed December 1, 1995, by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA). The state project number is 8.T560302 and the Federal Aid Project number is
NTHF-0001(3).
The project is currently divided into three sections. Table 1 lists the sections and
the projected let dates.
Table 1. Proiect Sections and Let dates

Section Let Date Description Length (mi)
R-210 A 10/16/01 US 1 from SR 1853/SR 2175 at Lakeview to NE of SR 5.2
1825 (Cranes Creek Road)
R-210 B 10/16/01 NE of SR 1825 to N of SR 1182 (Cedar Lane Rd) 5.0
R-210 C 9/18/01 N of SR 1182 to US 1 S of SR 1180 S of Sanford 2.6
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
J.
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Wetlands. The proposed project will impact fifty-four jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetlands were delineated using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual. The initial wetland delineation was performed within the
Preferred Alternative corridor by NCDOT consultants. These wetland delineations were
verifi l by Mr ? ..Riol*er of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office on March 2, 1995.
During the design ph4sp of e projeVt, addi ional wetlands that were not
identi4d.inthe original *etlWnd assessment were delineated. These additional impacts
were due to slight shifts in th&roadWay, fahlty'"rriariping, or because some wetlands were
simply missed during the original assessment. These additional wetlands are denoted by
an asterisk in Table 3 in Appendix A.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) rating system was applied to each wetland
site. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service Wetland Classification (Cowardin, 1979) system and the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental
Management; Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands (Report No. 96-01, 1996). The
most frequent community type impacted by the project is an intermittent or perennial
stream with wetlands of varying widths adjacent to the stream. Ground water seeps are
the main hydrologic force to these wetlands although they also receive varying degrees of
over bank flooding. These wetlands do not fit well into either the Seep or Headwater
Forest classification listed in the Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands. Therefore, the
classification Linear Seep was created to describe these wetland types.
Table 3 in Appendix A indicates the wetland communities, quality analysis, and
acres of impact for each section of the project. The "Acres Impacted" column in Table 3
reflects permanent fill, excavation, and Method III mechanized clearing in wetlands and
are further itemized in the summary sheets in Appendix B. All areas where excavation in
wetlands is proposed have been considered impacted in their entirety except in those
areas where stream relocations were cut into the wetlands at a depth matching the original
stream elevations. Drawings detailing and tables summarizing the wetland and stream
impacts are included with this application in Appendix B. They are grouped according to
Sections, A, B and C. Please note that drawings reflecting impacts to Section A Site 1
(Little River) are included in Appendix C.
The crossings of Crane Creek (Site 21- Section A) and an unnamed
tributary (UT) to Little Crane Creek (Site X - Section B) will result in 0.49 and 0.32 acre
of temporary fill in wetlands, respectively. These impacts are necessary to facilitate the
bridging of the riverine wetlands. NCDOT expects wooden mats will suffice for.both
causeways since the soil is mostly mineral and little compaction is anticipated. As
insurance, prior to construction, reference elevations will be taken in the temporary
impacted areas. Following construction, all temporary fill will be removed. If necessary
the area will then be restored to its original contour and rough surface texture based on
the reference elevations. NCDOT will revegetate the area according to the Streambank
I
Reforestation Detail Sheet included in Appendix D. Construction of the bridge over the
Little River and the associate floodplain will be done using a temporary bridge, limiting
the temporary impacts in this area to the footprint of the temporary bridge bents.
Surface Waters. Water resource classifications have not changed since the FEIS
was prepared. The DWQ best usage classification for Little River and its unnamed
tributaries'(UTs) is WS-III HQW. The DWQ classification for Crane Creek, Little Crane
Creek, Nancy Dyer Branch, and their UTs is WS-III. The classification for Little Juniper
Creek and its UT is Class C. Class WS-III refers to those waters protected as water
supplies which are generally in low to moderately developed watersheds and are suitable
for all Class C uses. Class C refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. HQW (High Quality
Waters) denotes those waters rated as excellent based on biological and physical/chemical
characteristics through division monitoring or special studies.
Personnel from NCDOT, USACE, NCDWQ and NCWRC determined
jurisdictional surface waters that would require stream mitigation in a September 30,
1998 field review. Those requiring mitigation are summarized in Table 4 in Appendix A.
The total channel loss for the project is 4880 linear feet. However, 1223 linear feet will
be relocated on site as detailed in the permit drawings, resulting in a net channel loss of
3,657 linear feet.
The Acres Impacted column of Table 4 indicates the impacts to farm ponds that
will be drained as a result of the project. The impacted ponds range in size from 0.09
acre to 5.83 acres. The pond comprising Site 2 of Section B is 4.52 acres in size. This
pond will be drained during construction and 0.91 acre of it will be filled. The remaining
3.63 acres of the pond will be allowed to refill naturally once construction is complete.
Threatened And Endanerpecies. As of June 16, 2000, the following species
are listed as threatened or endangered in the respective counties:
• Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas). Endangered. Lee and Moore
• Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). Endangered. Lee and Moore
• Harperella (Ptilimnium nudosum). Endangered. Lee
• Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Endangered. Moore
• American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana). Endangered. Moore
A Biological Conclusion of No Effect has been rendered for all species. In the case of
harperella, Michaux's sumac, and American chaffseed, little suitable habitat exists for
these species. Those few areas were surveyed and are detailed in the FEIS. Cape Fear
shiner and its associated Critical Habitat are not documented within the range of this
project. The project drainage area is south and east of the ridge area that supports the
Cape Fear shiner.
Dr. J.H. Carter III and Associates performed a survey for the red-cockaded "
woodpecker (RCW) in the project area and issued biological conclusion of No Effect in a
report dated October 1, 1994. The area was resurveyed on March 17, 1999 by NCDOT
biologists to identify potential changes in habitat since Dr. Carter's report. The results of
the NCDOT survey revealed that habitat conditions had not noticeably changed. In
addition, the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and unique habitats
was consulted and revealed no listing for the RCW within one mile of the project area.
Cultural Resources. In a letter dated March 23, 1995, State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) has concurred there are no effects on the National Register-eligible
properties located within the project's area of potential effect as well as the McNeil
Farmstead and the Ferguson House. These are two properties that were determined to be
eligible for the National Register.
The archaeological findings are detailed in the December 15, 1997 report
"Follow-up Archaeological Survey, Testing and Assessment of Revised Sctionas os
Alternative A, U.S. Highway 1, Moore and Lee Counties, North Carolina. The report
concludes the following:
a. The two cemetery sites, 31Mr105 and 31Mrl06, are significant historic and
archaeological resources which are eligible for listing in the national Register of
Historic Places, however they will not be disturbed by the highway project.
b. None of the archaeological sites that will be disturbed or destroyed by construction
within the Revised Corridor East of Cameron were determined to be significant.
c. None of the archaeological sites investigated within the Wetland Avoidance Corridor
were determined to be significant. However, complete evaluation of sites 31Mr300
and 31Mr205 was not possible because the property owners denied access. NCDOT
has made a commitment to follow-up with an archaeological assessment of these two
areas.
d. Site 31Mrl66 is not archaeologically significant and no additional investigation of the
site is recommended.
e. Site 31Mr169 is not considered to be archaeologically significant.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The USACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ),
a wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and
sequencing. Mitigation of jurisdictional impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include
avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, and compensating for impacts.
Avoidance & Minimization. During adoption of the Preferred Alternative, there
are many avoidance and minimization strategies employed to reduce impacts to natural
resources as well as many other concerns. These strategies are detailed in the FEIS.
Once the Preferred Alternative is identified, another attempt to further avoid and
minimize impacts is initiated. Field reviews were conducted on September 30, 1998 and
October 24, 2000. As a result of these field reviews and multiple in-house meetings, the
jurisdictional impacts were further reduced throughout the project. They are described
below.
Section A
Site 1 (Little River). The Little River and the associated wetland system are of
extremely high quality. It is generally agreed that it is very difficult to provide mitigation
that would replace the functions that would be lost by permanently impacting these
systems. Therefore, NCDOT has agreed to extend the original bridge from 393 feet to
1,308 feet. This design will avoid directly impacting 2.81 acres of wetlands that would.
have been impacted from the original bridge design. This design also bridges the "active
floodplain" of the Little River, as determined during a field review, while still providing a
safe sight distance with the proposed intersection tying back into existing US 1 near
station 29+00.
Unfortunately, this design will still impact 4.7 acres of high quality wetlands.
However, by removing the old road bed and adjacent areas that have been filled, NCDOT
will not only restore 6.4 acres of the same high quality wetlands, but will provide a
hydraulic opening that restores the "active floodplain" that is currently blocked by the
existing road. This is clearly evident in Figure 1 which, along with a written explanation
that depicts and itemizes the acreage of impacts and restoration, can be found in
Appendix C, the Little River On-site Mitigation Plan.
In addition to the restoration efforts, NCDOT is in the process of purchasing, or
has purchased, remnant parcels adjacent to the right-of-way, as depicted by the circled
numbers 2d, 2e, and 6 in Figure 1. This will preserve an additional 8.4 acres of high
quality wetlands. NCDOT has also encompassed the power lines and accompanying
easement within the side slope of the road to the extent practicable, as opposed to ten feet
beyond the toe of fill. This significantly reduces the area of maintained wetland within
the power'line easement. No right-of-way fences will be placed in the wetlands.
Site 10. This UT to the Little River and associated wetland is a high quality
system. One hundred seventy four feet of the UT has been relocated utilizing
bioengineering techniques to the extent practicable, considering the design constraints
posed by the topography. NCDOT will revegetate the area according to the Streambank
Reforestation Detail Sheet included in Appendix D.
Section B
Site 9. This site, along with Site 10, received a water quality rating of 64 and are
the highest rated wetlands on this section of the project. NCDOT has implemented an
alignment shift that reduced wetland impacts by 2.22 acres.
Site 10. This is a linear seep associated with an UT to Little Crane Creek. The
same alignment shift that reduced impacts to Site 9 was extended through Site 10. In
addition to the shift, the original bridge over the CSX Railroad, which runs adjacent to
this wetland, was extended 154 feet. This resulted in no impacts to the UT and reduced
wetland impacts by 1.89 acres.
Section C
Site 4 and 5. This is the highest quality system on Section C. NCDOT was able
to relocate 980 linear feet of the UT to Little Crane Creek, which runs through both sites,
utilizing bioengineering techniques. NCDOT will revegetate the area according to the
Streambank Reforestation Detail Sheet included in Appendix D.
Site 12. The original design had the service road running parallel to US 1 looping
out and through 1.07 acres of this wetland in order to tie into Eakes Road (SR 1181) and
provide access to adjoining parcels. The redesign kept the service road adjacent to US 1
and reduced wetland impacts to 0.05 acre. In addition, while the 0.05 acre impact area
received a DWQ rating of 46, the original 1.07 acres impact area received a rating of 61.
Table 2 is provided to summarize the site-specific avoidance and minimization
described above.
Table 2. Results of Avoidance/Minimization
Site Original Impact Redesigned Impact Net Avoidance . Net Minimization
Section A - Site 1 7.52 ac wetland 4.71 ac wetland 2.81 ac wetland
Section A -Site 10 574 ft stream 574 ft stream 174 ft stream
Section B - Site 9 3.02 ac wetland 0.80 ac wetland 2.22 ac wetland
Section B -Site 10 2.90 ac wetland
715 ft stream 1.01 ac wetland
0 ft stream 1.89 ac wetland
715 ft stream
Section C - Site 4 & 5 1118 ft stream 1118 ft stream 980 ft stream
Section C - Site 12 1.12 ac wetland 0.05 ac wetland 1.07 ac wetland
Compensation - Wetlands. The total wetland impacts from Table 3 is 41.5 acres.
Aside from the ephemeral wetland (Section B - Site 4), all impacts are essentially
riverine impacts. NCDOT is proposing to offset the 4.7 ay cres of high quality impact at
the Little River by offering 4.7 acres of on-site restoration (1:1 ratio) and 8.4 acres of on-
site preservation, as described in Appendix C. This on-site mitigation effort will be
packaged with the entire SALT (Sandhills Area Land Trust) Mitigation Site.
The SALT Mitigation Site is an approximately 327-acre site located near Lobelia
in Moore County that is being offered, in total, to offset wetland impacts associated with
the project. The SALT Site represents an ecosystem approach towards mitigation since it
not only has restoration, enhancement, and preservation of wetlands, but it also contains,
upland restoration of long-leaf pine forests in an effort to restore the ecosystem to its
historic assemblage.
As mandated by Section 401 regulations, a minimum of 1:1 wetland restoration or
creation must be provided for every acre of wetland impact. As stated above, NCDOT
proposes to meet the 1:1 requirement for the 4.7 acres of high quality impact at the Little
River by providing 4.7 acres of high quality restoration on-site. NCDOT proposed to
mitigate for the remaining 36.8 acres through the SALT Site. Based on groundwater
models, the SALT Site currently has 49 acres of wetlands that will be restored to its
historic hydrology by methods outlined in the mitigation plan. In addition, including the
10 acres of upland long-leaf restoration, approximately 82 acres will be planted with
native vegetation in an effort to restore the ecosystem. The details of these plantings and
the mitigation plan are in the Wetland Mitigation Plan - Salt Mitigation Site, dated
August 2000 and provided to the resource agencies in a letter dated August 16, 2000.
Compensation - surface waters. The project will impact 4880 linear feet of
jurisdictional streams. These streams are in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit
03030004. NCDOT proposes to mitigate for these impacts at a 2:1 ratio except for those
sites where on-site mitigation will be supplied. These sites will mitigated for at a 1:1
ratio, as noted in Table 4 in Appendix A. In a letter dated April 1, 1999, the North
Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) agreed to provide the mitigation for these
streams for in-lieu payments in the amount of $125/linear foot. A copy of this letter is
included in Appendix D.
It is anticipated that these activities will be. authorized through a Section 404
Individual Permit. By copy of this application, the NCDOT requests that the NC
Division of Water Quality review the proposal for authorization by a 401 Water Quality
Certification. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please
contact Mr. Michael Wood at [phone].
Sincerely, /
?G
.,?R,William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Purdue, USFWS
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMF
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. Dave Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Ms. Susan Cauley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
TABLE 3. US I Wetland Communities, Quality Analysis, and Total Impacts
Site Cowardin
Classification NCDENR - DWQ
Classification DWQ
Rating Acres
Impacted
Section A
1 PFOIE Bottomland hardwood forest 92 4.71
(Little River)
2 PFO1C Linear Seep 35 0.36
3 PFO1C Bottomland hardwood forest 87 3.16
4 PFO1 C Headwater Forest 39 0.62
5* PFO1C Linear Seep 23 0.02
6 PSS1D Linear Seep 30 1.19
7 PSS1D Linear Seep 15 0.06
8 PFO 1 C Headwater Forest 40 0.97
9 PFOIE Bottomland hardwood forest 31 0.21
10 PFOIE Bottomland hardwood forest 78 2.84
l l * PSS 1 C Headwater Forest 28 1.41
12 PFO1C Linear Seep 15 0.28
13 PFO1C Linear Seep 15 0.09
14 PFO1C Linear Seep 15 0.15
14a* PSS1D Headwater Forest 36 0.64
15* PFO1C Linear Seep 43 0.21
16 PFO 1 C Linear Seep 43 0.75
17 PFO1C Linear Seep 24 0.38
18 PFO1C Headwater Forest 30 0.40
18a* PF02C Linear Seep 37 0.52
18b* PF02C Linear Seep 25 0.32
19 PFO1C Bottomland hardwood forest (Crane Ck.) 39 0.06
20 PFO1C Bottomland hardwood forest (Crane Ck.) 39 0.15
21 PFO1C Bottomland hardwood forest (Crane Ck.) 73 1.34
22 PFO1D Linear Seep 30 0.82
22a* PF02C Headwater Forest 42 0.17
23 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.32
25 PFO1C Linear Seep 43 0.68
SUBTOTAL 22.83
Section B
1 PFO1 C. Wet Flat 19 0.05
2 PEM1E Linear Seep 20 0.56
3 PF02C Linear Seep 41 0.50
4 PFOIE Ephemeral wetland 28 0.42
6 PF02C Linear Seep 53 1.26
7 PFO1C Linear Seep 35 1.07
8 PFO 1 C Linear Seep 42 1.26
9 PEM1E Linear Seep 64 0.80
10 PFO 1 C Linear Seep 64 1.01
11 PFO1 C Linear Seep 15 0.08
12* PFO1C Linear Seep 26 0.43
13 PF02C Linear Seep _ 28 0.62
14 PFO1 C Linear Seep 51 1.28
15 PFO 1 C Linear Seep 29 0.51
16 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.48
17 PFO1 C Linear Seep 19 0.20
SUBTOTAL 10.53
Y
Section C
1 PEM1C Linear Seep 36 0.37
2 PEM 1 C Linear Seep 23 1.83
3 PF02C Linear Seep 46 0.49
4 PFO 1 C Linear Seep 76 1.20
5 PFO1 C Linear Seep 76 2.77
6 PFO1C Linear Seep 37 0.27
7 PFO1 C Linear Seep 29 0.79
8 PF02C Linear Seep 27 0.18
10* PF01C Linear Seep 23, 0.10
l l * PFO 1 C Linear Seep 23 0.07
12* PFO1C Headwater Forest 46 0.05
SUBTOTAL 8.12
TOTAL 41.48
* - Indicate additional impact sites due to slight shifts in the roadway, incomplete mapping, or not
identified during the original assessment.

TABLE 4. US 1 Relocation - Stream Impacts
Site Water Body Channel Channel Proposed Acres
Impact Replaced Mitigation* Impacted
Section A
1 UT to Little River 341 0 682 0
5 UT to Little River 7 0 14 0
10 UT to Little River 574 174 574 0
12 UT to Crane Creek 138 0 276 0
13 UT to Crane Creek 26 0 52 0
14 UT to Crane Creek 39 0 78 0
15 UT to Crane Creek 256 0 512 0
16 UT to Crane Creek 600 0 1200 0
17 UT to Crane Creek/Farm Pond 223 0 446 5.83
19 UT to Crane Creek 259 0 518 0
21 UT to Crane Creek 223 0 446 0
22 UT to Crane Creek 43 0 86 0
24 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.12
SUBTOTAL 2729 174 4884 6.95
Section B
1 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.31
2 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.91
4 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.12
5 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.09
6 Nancy Dyer Branch 213 0 426 0
9 UT to Little Crane Creek 167 0 334 0
12 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.09
14 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.57
15 Farm Pond 0 0 0 1.59
SUBTOTAL 380 0 760 6.68
Section C
3 Farm Pond/ 282 0 564 0.20
UT to Little Crane Creek
4 UT to Little Crane Creek 472 449 472 0
5 UT to Little Crane Creek- 646 531 646 0
6 UT to Little Crane Creek 276 0 552 0
9 Farm Pond 0 0 0 0.67
10 Little Juniper Creek 39 0 78 0
11 UT to Little Juniper Creek 56 0 112 0
SUBTOTAL 1771 980 2424 0.87
TOTALS 4880 1154 8068 14.50
* - A 2:1 multiplier was applied to each impac si e, except r t s on-site re ocatio
ovi
Si 4-P-
wltl
P6Vtds
APPENDIX B
Permit Drawings and Summary Sheets
I e
? M"•?Nortnv ew z ? Ou'ncan 5• /
aIrore 't io 1\ Carbontor?? ,
Whynot 42 on 4 6 .41 9
1;1 :a halybeateSpringsll; l
.C
rSanford
S Wes [moor. `? +2 ? 8 ogler
Hi1h aIIS GI ind 1 `? , \ c ?/ Ro. s ax. K.phng 21
7 - 705 ! ?! ?_Broad.9ay 1?;1 g
Tramv.a
Rob S •rcow . i 1\
7 `+C .u Cfi` S
AcWR „.c `L E E 1:1 Qp Elides
pies ) 8 * ° Creek / Coats
5 arkw00d ?o Lemon li Manners llmgton
Springs
swoon H A R ``;E T ben
O O R 52 , 1; l *7 55
" 9 +Cartna¢e •' v ? Olivia r 2 •r? o\ 3
705 2 ameron Z r O
v Samarcand Hill Crest , Plnev,ew - Erwi : Dun 9
Whispering If 2 Is Sunnlevel
- :' F-1 '21I Seven Lakes - 22 Ines ass's hn50 vdle 7 Spout Springs 210 + 17 823
I; ?SDrings 13 Eastwood
Emery WEn 1 9 `1 ?Cakevlew sn.? 7 1 in to
i? + 6 t + r ` ` z" i7 i ?S God- n
Jackg 4y _ •?? 2 Manly Manchester 5 Falcon
S 7? C
In X_ - SDrin s, Pine hurt 1 5 $out n ??r T' •!? 1• !? . ?:? waoe 3 82
73 Sprin lake no 9 t3
5? rma.rh Woods SNP I.. C U M• ?1 R. E A Nf
Fo.fl e -T
5 Villa ye. PineDbuf te ' FOR! J"GG MILITARYRFScrhnON ? 7
711 Fayeqenii 2 s
shley Melghts. '
S
6 Mc in `?H K E-
MON D
LL I ? Montrose "?j 59 • . - .r ?. ! 3 S
Sandh,n, Rec. Aree Oftofian BF'ypFF + ? rIlQedd^?-r ,_ ?- _ ;1,' 3Vandere Autrvvi
Marston 2S Timberland ?I
lerdel 21
C c• 9.. _ ?y`..F F •,? O Roc:Raeford:
` H • . ?? yll?
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 20 30
VICINITY' MAP 70 Scale of Kilometers
131-i- V3 v
i
Or
r J
lot.
j T., 17
to a-
' i " 79-x•• t 1 t ,
„ 11,9
jxfl,
reur:d....?'.. - v.;
r J 183
.193
194
?./
mot ........ _? c 1
- 19•n '0.,..r. ? //' j / ,rl, ?• 7 • '.
i m12 l•F,
r
;IM 19
ran
i o f 2 3 4 MILES
IT1111 __ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SCAL-E DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET I OF So NOVEMEBER 1997

SITE nnaP
SCSI L E
O Sab /D[!OM
I: 2. r,

J

s
SITE MAP
SCALE
U $O4 /OUOM
25000
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF 56 NOVEMEBER 1997
?l
c
r

23.02-9 -Y6-REV V 5 j i (= Z PR
1EGIN PROP. C/A
3EGIN PROP. FENCE r
' 000 (E-T,) ?i RZ • G
L /
c
... 3 `-U ? ? oRM T ANS & MEOZ p,NR j tGN4 o r //
z 6 PR?p _ `?'y
O ?/ •5
ITCH
CAT-1

+ s
s

1
•
Vo, /

4.5
END F
.01 w P END F
23.0(

^ 16
; P 1

' •
^~?' Of %OR C+Iq NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
-r M TRANSPORTATION
\ 0° 02

N`'` DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
OFYp?

MOORE I LEE COUNTY
940 RT. PROJECT 8.T560302
.048 +00-135 US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEN
-REV -Y6-REV
to North of SR 1825, R=210 A

255 (RT) 49.536 (RT) ?F SHEET i+ OF b?

wwo$

m

+45.838 -L-
4 -
5.000 (LT)
(147.64') / ?E
,

, PR P. P A T C
?
` a

T
L
Y.

W/.:y TER FABRIC +80 f
T '
F _ E BERM GUTTER W/ 6 m F
3E TRAf. RG.
W
Q
•*lc 1 ,•

o .
r 4 ?
J

o 4
_.

0
f tU
Z

°A,
y,
E ° °° Q
ART CNTR CT N
/14 NLY N W AN
ITYP.) A r
\ -? L

w IL

? \
+45.838
45
.000 (RT)
(147.64') `?
a }

SCALE
.? IT E3 0 4 ?>,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAV ING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
A G O O G O O )>1: 10'1'1i51'IEhll'. um,ACT IN WI:)'"ND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
A n %. A A/'^ I)Uli'f0I<IECIIANICALCLUAILINO OF SR 1825.
LIL•'YOND CONS 11.UC71UN LLNllTS
SCALE AS SHOWN
VEN7TG5 FILL IN WETLAI.VD V%cg
-
SHEET OF NOVEMEBER 1997

O
O
C\

/ -L- ST 34+26
302
- - .

+47. I
do U 302
-L_
7
+26.302
45.000 /LT) ??-
J (74764
7' 147.64
3 PROP. R/W (CHORD) C
x A
?
i AT. T`?•

J
A
N SEE DITCH DETAIL •g• FA - C
SEE PROFILE laP _
C
LTERAFABRIC A
3>

I o .z
S
rrm
RCP 2G
O f/
+60 11 ?___- ? N ?
-FF
d
Q ?

U

a -L- US I
ET! n" ?

ET LSE SU ^
D L
I I z
z
? co
2GIo
?b r
N^ N
2 N
€8 t 3`

Q 7 P
L

F
A m
SEE DIT
CH DET
IL P
/ PRO
?' P. R/W (CHORD) A +26.302 {_
-lr+47.302 -L-
\
000 RT)
(147
64' O 45.000 (RT) ` .
.
_
)
\ EfP

w
w a
\ ?g.?a'?,

SCALE
ZZ, to O 20 M

G?I? E NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRAN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SPORTATION
MOORE COUNTY
B.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAG E, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
p p p t. p [) 1M.-NOTES T)SM1IP. IhII'ACT IN \VIfLAND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
n A A p A^ A A DUE TO biLiCIIANICAL CLF.ARLNU OF SR 1825.
JJLYOND CONSTRUCTION LI UTS
SCALE AS SHOWN
DENOTa?, GILL IN W£TLA.NO•
5?
?
NOVEMEBER 1997
OF
SHEET

()DO -L-
nn f1 T) O
J N
? N
a
BELT

U ?
4 Z r
a
-L- US 1 o
LLB N 62 45'59.7- E
r
?? N
J U
? Z

J +78 EN
RM G

Q +44
to
S mn CS FUNNEL
c? DR IN W/ ELBOW
0
u;
o (? \ N
LA A

i
W FABRIC
6 m FILTER

C
PROP. R p, P AT. 'V'
T. 0.9 m TONS' L A
=L/4 ILTH R FABRIC SEE PROFILE
PR P. N

y
y,
1
2k r4a

51 TE#3#3
n n n O n n ob DENOTES TEN P. INWACT IN WETLAND
- n A A 4 /n A A A DUE TO MECHANICAL CLEMUNCI
13EYOND CONSTRUCTION LHvUTS
OEM,-ES GILL IN WST'LA.VD.
SCALE
YD al lD - 0 27 K

--I- 00-"V E 141s; `TW

1 z

\
w
o
1 °

a

%J
r

0
_

? - QQJ
--

1 W
>

3I } ?

-?
I E
4
? I
?
Cott
4A J N
f'
CC
0

-?? =
o
?? g

a? rN -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
O
Q
8.T560302
R-210A
J -? PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
VEMENT
J CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PA
S
I
U
3 I
.
.
SIGNALS
MARKINGS, N
W PROPOSED TO
NORTHEAST
O
L
SR
2175
A
BYPASS FROM LAKEVIE
T
OF SR 1825.
m 41
-01 SCALE AS SHOWN
I' Y OF?
SHEET NOVEMEBER 1997
Q
s
s
r
?S
z ?
v
_o
_10)
0
_0
5
0
-N
_ %f%
_0
-N?
- c
6

%d
z z

? z
w s
J
u
N

z
Z
11! w
Q ?
71

s
0
- V1
-0
-U)

ow
Qs
r ,1
H;
dd
S> N
0
'O N'N N
v
?j

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
N
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
- MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
CQ
Z ]? _ Q SHEET OF ?C? NOVEMEBER 1997
'I ? 9
8
C)

"o _vc

I O WOODS '
/? ?` -
590/
J
-
r"N ol
j
5}5

C
A
PROP. AT. 'V' IT H

? ? SEE DITCH DETAIL B'
? SEE PROFILE
/

P
•4 2GI
SEE FALSE SUM
/ DETAIL II

oa
o?t0j
/
F {I SUMP 2GI 600mm RCP
nS ?-- I
5
.9 a6
- - a
v
00
i
?
FA MP
A L
! 2GI
C
--
------- -
T
w?OS
J I CLASS B RIP RAP -
W/ 12 m= FILTER FABRIC
EST. 4.5 m TONS
' W/ 14 m= FILTER FABRIC C
A
PR P AT. Q.fi
ITCH
BA5
I

I SEE PROFILE
lk
4
SCALE
Zorn t0 0 20 M

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
A A O 041 ^ n DENOTES 7'IihLl. INUIACT' IN WI-71-LAN:,
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
DUCTo 1%II-XIIANICAI
CLEUUNC
,
1
1JLYOND CONSTRUCTION LIA-UT S CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
.. MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
W BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
v- 1' DENOTES WETLAND OF SR 1825.
DEhI?TES GILL IN w?TUavp. SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET I OF t NOVEMEBER 1997
6 10
:i S 1 T l? J? ` ` A?
1 1 DB.`
-Y2-BASELINE . POT 5+00.000 = N ??
Y2- POS 1Ot72x \9,17.312 LT. a
ARCHIE L. BLUE
a? I I
DB 1115 PG 54 .15
U7 144 (3 1 K
57 >+ o
Ivi
,c) w I I C
t
WOODS
+55.871 -Y2- +83.750 -Y2- I o I
13.000 (LT) 13.000 (LT) I o I
EST* TONS +74.342 -Y2- I
CLASS B RIP RAP .%,. , 0
W/ 5 m2 FILTER FABRIC 13.000 (LT) I
•jPROP. C A TCH 4.4
` Np TOE:
...:-
SEE RIJIFIL
?, B EXIT RT .) N ? --"
r
r R /W - E LZNy_.. ,- EMO? _
-G> ? c
JgME
?' `^'' i'? ?' TYP • o sR 1664 O
WL
C - 0 152 M i.
E
CP / cr ?w Y 2- Z a• _ --?-? R I V
:1 7,
•.a " C)
_ w • RAVE
W H VARIES 6B ? RIVE- IPA---- AKE' NE E °.AR r-- cR SLOPE /W o w° E
iofm tCR?aL..? . C -
SPEGI-AL
` +15.:;000 -Y2- Th NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
13.000 (RT TRANSPORTATION
a S =J DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ISF Bus PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
4 ' CANOPY
0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
'`r+ I 7. ?osrn?
a 1.1?
`4s to 1 0 1r MOORE I LEE COUNTY
~ PROJECT 8.T560302
R I C US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
BASE ° m
NOUT 1 SHEET /I OF58
DETAIL 'DD"
s -pin) WOODS
_?
SCALE
Z? M io 0 20 A'1
n o 0 0 o n o DHNO*J*U'I'IiM1IP. INUIACT IN WETLAND
?? ^ ^ D DUE TO M1;CIL'kNICAI, CLMUNU
UL'YOND CONSTRUCTION LIhIITS
DENOTI=S PILL IN W ci LAKl7.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J.- -?- DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
s v

\
I I

\
1
1
11 z
o ?
? I
I
i
i
i
1
+ 1
D ?
3 /

Q
Q

3
N
h
O ? -
U ?
Q 1 -
_ 2 z
1
l ? -
a
> u
o
_ O
J o 0 W -l/
n
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Q DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
= O MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN D
SHEET it OF 15v NOVEMEBER 1997
13
r r

n
?r 0
?: rI a

I?,

_2
-N
Q
y
N
n
r
_O
H
J
6
7
5
Q ;o
Z. z
J Z
1U J
J
I1
W 'n
ul
0
Z w
CJ o

0
_ q
N
p

?
Q'.t
?
.0
Q
rs
_ Ng
Kd
o?
S> N
0
_ p
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- ul MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
_ BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF NOVEMEBER 1997
I ?(J
- -o

-10
?Z -
f r^-
' ? a
_n
_o
'N
_p
Q
. m
11 9
SE SUMP ` 7
III _ (EX. DEPTH)
RT.
12 i ( DITCH
99
2GI K/
I \ FLAT GRATE
4 P
'aRlc C, 93
----=--
yip
F ?
ra 15409.691
-3'06.,f
9 S 1T Tz- -y3- PO
SEE FALSE SUMP % BOW
DETAIL i
(TYPE I'0') _L- PX
CIL- Y3- PO
-
a
a SEE FALSE SU1Pg
DETAIL 11
KI/ CP 2GI
F 5m^ R ' ?' se17?
-1-PoC 44*94.2TI.25.075 RT.
-L BASELINE PINC 34.?29?1:
\\\ \? -L- 4 4.
GEORGE R. BLUE `-SLOPE STAKE LINE
DB 134 PG 29
M/ 14 m FILTER FABRIC

o

??, GUTTER
PAD.
/ 3, ;6007 RP'C'
30.000 tRTI .

GEORGE R. BLUE
DB 163 PG 2T4
2a
RAMP B
28 PIs Sta 2+49956
'
'
' PIS Sta 3+2&953
3'
e-422'36 PI Sta 3+94.,
A-1S33'24.S
190
39
7(LT) 8-4
000
Ls - 65 .
Ls - 55.000 L - 97.747
.
ST - 2J680
LT - 43.348 ST -18.344
LT - 3&678 T - 49R6
R : 000

,h D.S: - 80 km/
PIs Sfa 3+M668 PI Sta 4+41.213
8-4'35'01.2' A-13'BY41.9'(LT)
Ls - 46.000 L - 72.754
ST -16.010 T - 36.556
LT - 32.011 R : ?

C I
RAMP
RAUP

30.000 (RT)
h :y
V
pORYH
F ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION _
a1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
( PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
7OF'M ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE I LEE COUNTY f
PROJECT 8.T5603O2
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET 15'OF 5$

2GI **

\ 2GI - DETAILLII SURF

Nonz

o?
f Pct icm o
SEE FALSE SUAP
/ DETAIL 1
Ecr SEE•ROMY. STD, g? 6 t? oI1TCET
Q SEE FALSE SUW
Q 2GI Q ® DETAIL tI
EIP
O
I
SI i E 48
Q ? L DE>vo?s Rr?DrT?eeJ ac. ?,d-/grd 1
?? ?a RDTr?:,?nJT iMpAL'T5
DcN0-E5 FII-L IN WETL11?7 D.
Cctio',?SExCAVATlOt4INI WEfLAND.
SCALE
Z'M 10 O ?A Ir?
/I
PR

i

KEITH BYRD
O DB 510 PG 444
4 2 ? ?=
0

:Ilk
C
A
T. 2.7 m TONS /
CUSS B FBI P RAP :.
W/ 10 m2 FILTER FABRIC
F 115
wts
o _ ? 2 wL 2\3365`, C
N PROP. SPECIAL DITCH
?. o .
V Of "ORTp NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF E
N TRANSPORTATION
2GI
N N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
1 O EIP OFm? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
I MOORE I LEE COUNTY
+ N PROJECT 8.T6603O2
Q? r N N V* US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW 1
?- a ° to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
Z SHEET OF 5$
CTIr. i

S T. RE
REW. W.
T- c- 9
\ KEITH BYRD
DB 510 PG 444
\ 42

:D OLDHAM
13 PG 95 Q
tttt? \
31
I_- uQ_f HAKE LINE --_-
N
? C
S
wmas - '
ASOMM RCP ?..
ZT -c - -?
.r ._..-`
- -? 09 SEE FALSE SUAf'
EJJ DETAIL II o
( TYPE 1.
D')
SEE FALSE S Y
p E o
2GI. ••
( X. DEPJNI _
d \`
*ASE
dl
. as .r \ 2G?
d
Y Y
wows
• ?r"rn,
r ? Q
ZYQ
2G1 Y
N 1 ?,
.INE PING 36'"
N• f
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
\ OF Tit ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
s MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
V/ 70 m•
SHEET 18OFSB
a
1+04.000 RP'A'?
.30.000 (RT)
F C98.43'>
0
0
P s
?L 14-T ii:
6 'S O ?v
Q ? ?
Q + R •
EST.
3,'S'?RT.s m TDHS
CLA3P R4 V (14.2(70 '?:T?.,,
W/ 6 m= FILTER FABRIC
-LAST STS
\ PROP. R/W
(CHORD)
BL Y, ,-?L
f-1 M R GUTTER
-------------------------
-----------
--------------------------
S 30' /0' 57.8" W
\+40
t 300mm C5 FUNNEL
DRAIN W/ ELBOW 3?
Q ?
- 4
/ <
ul
z
1
t, A:?b b' HIP HAP
FgT. 0}9 m TONS T. .9 m TONS )W/ 4. m° FILTER FABRIC M ELAII CLASS B
RIP RAP
8Ft1 a
= F
T
R F
180.0
W/ 4 m
g
IL
E
W/ 4 m= ILTER FABRIC i \\
F C `•? FULL LAN
PROP. R/W

I RAMP D PQT\ TA 0 +00.000 14.200 RT)
-L- ST STA 51-82.358
'O

1
SCALE
./? ,-J
VE/?lES F1??+Sy/r/GY? ;,.J h9n': 4,'- ?n IK 10 o 111
7 # f O NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
L1 DIVIS30N OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
n p p p p p p plil'10'I'Ii.S T1sh11. IhII ACT IN \VL'7T,ANI
8.T560302 R-210A
^ 6 q A ^ ^ ^ ? DUL•"CU Ati clIANICAL CLEAIUNU
'
'
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
IIBYOND CUNS
I1tUCT
IUN L311llTS CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
X
DErJMr-_5 WETWND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
se OF SR 1825.
D'cNOT ES FIW. IN WETW.tiD. '
SCALE AS SHOWN
C
SHEET & OF ?? NOVEMEBER 1997
-oENoTE3 Pill /N !5 ? ACC OaTU .u
.OM BRSB Ui?zl?
??? w?Dy yE?sr
+????E sF?a, gs
?o
45 CO. ( )
Y."o00
+8 .358 -
S I (1 7.64 )
FABRIC
THOMAS GRIFFIN
© DB 644 PG 196
LAT. 1.6m BRSE n1TC 1} EIP I
L1NEp 1v/ J•IOODX ?/E(?Ti1TlGX
AND pJAT1JE
V. i
C PROP. R/W ' C
A ? A
8&UNIFORMaTAPER K ,%
o
?J
w
Z
J
1
Q
L
JW/03 4 m' FILTER FABRIC
3 END SHOULDER OOmn3 CS FM??DRAIN W/ EFELT N N
?o
8:1
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL III .
yi N NO SH UL "` F w/ 6 m' FILTER FABRIC
• A / ELBOW BERM GUTTER C
-L-ZLIZZ,?-Z --- a
6 T.- T N PROP. LAT. 'V' D TCH
180.0 FULL LANE \ W/A4 m'BFILTER FABRIC SEE PROFILE
C w x C
q PROP. R/W \ q
+00.000 -L-
x ?k y 45.000 (RT)
(147.64')
-9 ITS,- # 10
7?E7?1?5 ?X?R1"(Dhl ink IVBTLRNQrj
OENrES GILL IN 1.4EI LA.vD.
"-' DENOTES weTI-AND`
0 Df Nb.r- . T15-P• TMPHCT IN LADS
9 , T'O NECAFtQtCAl..CaGarlr'Fj E2?oY?d
j' cros+ToetoA %%t-lvt-t,
1 ? • ? ? ? • ? 7?N0T?5 ?i l ? I N ?1 f?R L? F?Jf}'RsR-5
SCALE
zcm .0 0 zo M

} 1
'
1
1
-

-

,
a 6
o

A
C

n J ?°
a
8 Z Q
o z

cc lw-
2 3
0

I
Q
t I
.
S
N ?
°0
u d'

ti a I J ?

4 ? 1-
U

' >
o
?
F
J
?
Z ?
J
H

u
J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
111
I ?
MOORE COUNTY'
/ z S.T560302 R-210A
G
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCIN
' CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
CC 1 MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
Q BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
I SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2-f OF NOVEMEBER 1997
a=i N a=1 Chi
I
I I -?
U
a
r
v
1

z?

f

i

I _ - --IT K-r T --
N
I }
? F
N
n
_ a
v?
M
I
yI
'I In ?
J
- Un
-o
-VN
-2

_ Q
Q
4 W
Z
g Z
O o
z
a o
E
0
z?
Q
Qom. ?
N? Q
eL
_> N
O
v? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
- DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
-
? CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
? MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN

_V1 rt
SHEET JS OF 516 NOVEMEBER 1997
z d- 22.
t
}
r.
U „
N
\ D
N
\©
;off
7X
z
?, 3 iva
N
b1 L ?O
vy?^? U
aN F.? ,-`Nj? Q
_ 0 coo
z ? , 5•
n a ,?
Z4
A ?? ..
F-
W
ON ON vWwi ?
?<
U a dC
In ?CC
3 C?
s
¢ o
C) a
a
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
3
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
a PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
ey CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
a OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN Q
SHEET & OF 59 NOVEMEBER 1997
m =

2
a b
LL
2
'

I
(
j
.r-
O
I

r
J ,,,.
4 2 w

W IT1

I

LL'V3
U ¢. I 1 a
3

a

I
Oa \
:N \ ?` ;N M r ;N\
a \
N
N
:N a
LL
N Q ?'

l

N :
wc? :
? \
r \
o r
r ^
E LL
)
ai \ a
i ;N a ;N \
? E
\ o
1 r
4, 3
?I
:1
:fly

\
a o
0

?
I
r ?
I
aN
? I o
?
.\
'N r r
E

S?f'W ? Q
4.
F / a
E

''L Z'L 0 0'L Z'L Z
\ NV 3W
0
o I
;N
!, u
0'Sb e ? 0'Sv

\ LL?
U
K
'l ZfL 0'L 0'L Z'L Z'L ?
\ \ M
Nn 0?w
?? 0 bt ...? ?g1
5
0'SC I 056
d 'S'd
a w
= a Z' L Z' l ?

>a I ON
n N

w I
?
J
V
n .as
? I

r
x •
•
ti0 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
a
as
a
O p?

? o
}
E
0 ?
-
W? ( J

N
J ?
Q
Z

?
fl ^ 3

J W

- N %
w - N N?
1 I
J L?j
c

I
Q -

O
? ')
I
J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
I S.T560302 R-210A
I Z PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
1
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S.
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
004 X75 'VIS 1IN SCALE AS SHOWN

',a SHEET. OF NOVEMEBER 1997
0
?-) co
?? Cal
• ' -N
O
A
z 3
3 u
w - o
-tn Q? ? o
N d
r Q - o _> N
O J e '?
a ?
N .Z
r
J - ?
Ln 'V
Ln C4
? - O
i
c?i Q
O
4
i
r
H NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
'- N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
z 4 8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
V Q N MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
W BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
7?1 SCALE AS SHOWN Qb
SHEET _19 OF NOVEMEBER 1997
o W
W -
m o
N
W
rn
:3 IT E 1Z
I
I
-PR•OH 0 I BER DITCH
SEE PROFILE I
-Y4- I X(LT)
PROP- R/W
-i - -- -
F
'TAKE LINE c--
3
- LW o
LLj (.0
w - V) N
IT 3? n -- -?
o
SR 2005 C3 CYPRESS CH Z
24 a., T- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
STAKE L I_ NE TRANSPORTATION
! DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFTjRk ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
PROP. R/W MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
SEE PROP. DITCH LA T. ' DETAIL T A H to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SEE PROFILE
SHEET 26OF 58
? Z. 31
a 5 X00 x
ENE ? 2X ? MPS
/../
FILE - - o°3 1 \
A -o X
r
PROP. `r
HEADWALL
1
0 6 +'42
BEGIN SHOULDER
BERM GUTTER
3 +43
Soy o ?? N
vf?
W/ (2) ELBOWS
+45.64 -L-
45.000 (LT)
C
A
U)

EST. 0.9 m TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP ---
W/ 4.m2--FILTER FABRI
PROP..
V _. AIL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 'V'
EST. 0.9 m TONS
CLASS . RIP RAP
/
W/ 5 m 2 F}I LTER F Q -IC
----- ----r __ -_.
GRAL,
z ??n

W/"24 mz FIL

N \° ?J
\?. PR(
SEE
SEE
t.
TRAF. BRG.\
.DI W/ ANGLE\
VANE GRATE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT S
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE I LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210,A
r4Dl
c
SHEET 2-
? OF 58 MA!

v
5rTI E 13
N?
N Ln.
c
Lo ?.

1? o
-F

O

U
T N t
K,
T
L
ER FABRIC
52 m2 FIL
[C
I
P
?tE ROP. SPECIAL DITCH T. •0 TRAP
L 2 FABRIC
W/ 5 m FILTER
o t OCATE 8. REMOVE
+60.000 -Y4- EXIST. 600mm c`
13.000 (LT)
F
+30.000 -Y4-
9.144 (LT) pRa? a?W C/ REMOVE EXIS
O 2 @ 600mm CONS
?-"- _
F o o - R SPIKE
SR 005 5,4 B $`3
CH RD
N cyPRESS
„r•,-?,..? L,?- of N°"rh c? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
L.?
PROP- TRANSPORTATION
I ? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
I +30.000 -Y4-
9.144 (RT)
0.000
'"ION
I
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET to OF58
10,
FARD
100
17
I---_

O?
U
zz

+53.000 -Y
/11-5 000 (LT
9.000 (L1
.I
I.
j ALL UNABLE
e
OTHER U\6
MAY EXIST
I
F
I ING RIW
- w

4.8
GRAVEL
1050mm _+*k
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
V
DRI

TRANSPORTATION
m C NC
-
= Itt
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

I c lact

3

?a??
/G a
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
O9
.? m

r r c0ROP. R/W E
P . MOORS /LEE COUNTY

HEA U PROJECT 8.T6603O2
o .+20.000 -Y4- US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
a 17.368 to N orth of SR 1825, R-210 A

SHEET 2.11 OF S8
III II NN
EST. 13.6 m TONS
W/ 31 m2 FILTER F ERIC
I
+43.000 -Y4-
15.000 ( T) g
(
+25.000 -Y4- 19.000 T)
45.000 (LT) 3
i
-s`
CY)
tw r -. t,
1 _r

201 ABRIC

R/W (CHORD)

r 3 1 TYPE A)

,48
+44.796
SEE FA
DETA 'CAT-1
a

OUB - B ) 5 LDER No
GUIDERAIL Z
ETAI L I 1 5
0
N 30' l0' 57 - _ 47 ?
.t, T,, 8 EIP

]E ?
'fi O
'lc

4 G U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\ 35 Y i
-
1
p p p p p p p
0 p -
_-' F
sA
/ 3L• 3L• 3F.
C9 A-07 DETAIL _V
; -
tic -
'
3 13
A t3 A
+76.7!
45.00

\-L- TS 59+76.796
N P N 45+
-L- POT 5.9-75.658, 0.125
PROP. R/W (CH(IRD) / ?. `
s erg /¢4.
HopuzomTAL 64ALE
own=
O to ao ADM
RIE 'p?narES Aan?r?on?s+c. WeTL9ND.?Ps+?r
BOG '? ? W /NPACTS
Wwo? pENSCS FILL IN W£TLANV.
p p p p 6 Z p PEnICTl_S TEMG. ZNIPAC.T IN WETLAND
p p O 6&& L 61 DLIETD MEGHAN ILAL GLEAti,.1?1G-
BEYOND C.0)45'TFz-lj YIDW LIMITS.
(O
Y
O
T. .7 N
W/ 9 m= FILTER FABRfC g
1 7a 749
45.000 SLT)
(147.64 )
PENCFM.5 EXCi*VATIOr-t Ill WE.TLANp.
l

PROP. LAT. '
? 7DE
TDE?
rLWAY
SPECIAL TYPE 'A' SILT BASIN
W/ PERFORATED 600im CS
RISER / TEE
-6
I, rl CLASS 9 RIP RAP
r 2S m= FILTER FABRIC
7, m T N
W/A48 mt FILTER FABRIC
?- _
I 2G1 W/
_4 Om CS W/ FLAT GRAT
ELBOW
us-?
i
\ BAR RANCH
OB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618
\
+20.000 {- \
600 (LT)
.? ?
-iDE ((.10' ) /
HAYES
\? ?64ji? f? / +}dpp. 000 {J-
\\ ] rA?( ? ? ? (147?64l1T) ??
2GI W SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL III

HoRiZph1TAL SCALE
o to .2o Aom
i
D$NOT ES FILL IN WL. 1.P-'40-
DENoTE5:ILLIN SURFAC?_ I.aATER•
PEn10TS5 TEMR =M7AC.T IN weTLAND
DLIETD MECHANICAL- C.LEARIntC.
SS.YOND CONSTF.LIC.YIDN LlC11T'S.
FST. 7.7 m TONS
CL S T1" {
W/ 9 m= FILTER F)

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET V OF 5 v NOVEMEBER 1997
-:?
114
oo?
-144
7t?/ y y
` f ii
SITE #16
SCALE
20M 10 0 20M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING. DRAINAGE. FENCING
CULVERTS. STRUCTURES. SIGNING. PAVEMENT
MARKINGS. AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
O DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
• •••.• OF SR 1825
DENOTES TEMP. IMPACT IN WETLAND SCALE AS SHOWN
DUE TO MECHANICAL CLEARING
BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHEET:10F?
i r
I +
+24.000 -L-
45.000 jLT)
(147.64 I
iOV
TO R/M
PR03EEPGTT 6E
3EE. H?
EST. 1.8 m TANS
'CC iiSS 'g'1ifP?RAF
W/ 6 m' FILTER FABRIC
r
1
I
DRAIN POND
J BAR RANCH
DB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618
E-u
••5EE DITCH DETAIL 'R'
S?E PROFILE
\' • ?. •, C
?'• A

1 T7 •. VSO -L-
J 45.00064 I LT) I
!147.
II I .
?. ' SW ISEW.IEF-L 0!TCH DETAIL 70'
l?. , v SEE PROFILE cr
_±4 F
SITE 17-
42 m' FILTER FABRIC
SITE"* )7
/\M?EQDMAkL• •.•
• . , /••• , • ;•• 'i50' END STi LOER • ?;?
4 _
I
I .1 , C
00
I
EAT -I
?
? PROP. LAT. ' DITCH _ ?V' --- -?.??
1
SEE D TCH DETAIL 'B' 1SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE 4•
'? ? C S•'.y v-'i?? ? cavcq F
J
A
,.l +16.038 -L- '
PROP. TOE PROIEC14D
SEE DITCH DETAIL 0 45.000 CRT)
(147.64' )r-
J BAR RANCH
OB 530 PG 988 -
,DB 453 PG 618
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRAa\ISPORTATION
SCALE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
20111 10 0 20111 MOORE COUNTY
DLNOTESI%,LIN WETLAND S.T560302 R-210A
DENOTESI:000AVATIONIN WETLANDS PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING. DRAINAGE, FENCING
PAVEMENT
NG
,
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNI
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1

••
? DE'NOTE'S I7LL IN SUILI'ACE WATER BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
_
• " -"
?
"•" OF SR 1825. •
G o o
'6
6
-' I)BNOTI6S TENUI. INU'ACT IN WETLAND - ,
r"'
A A A A A
"
6 DUL TO rlliCILANICAL CLEARING SCALE AS SHOWN
BEYOND CONSTRUCTION LINUTS
54 NOVEMEBER 1997
A
'TOTAL OF '2 ,1 . OF IMPACT To SURFACE WATER OF
SHEET
DUE TO DRAINING PoNF3• 33
t0E ? _ #? ,
+st.o00 -L-
166.000 (L7)
\ (544.62')
f
i
1
i
i
r ?
'i
+93.000 -L-
©J BAR RANCH U6.000 'LT'
OB 530 PG 988 J. !479.00' I
DB 453 PG 618 TDE
oa?tN
Por+D N
? Z
_ J
V
t0E
` TDE TOE TOE
r +84.038 a53.000 'L-
45.000 (LT) 106.000 (LT)
\ (147.64') (341.77')
\ Aq
SCALE
zom 10 0 ?.0 N1 .
S/?C ' J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J C 'TT ( DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
ToTAL OF 2,3G OF IMPACT TO
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
SURFACE WATER DUE Tb DRgNWC, POND, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF ? NOVEMEHER 1997
4
Nk\
Nl?
n PORARY DRAINAGE EASEMENT
OUND POND @ J BAR RANCH
® 2196.Vw
41.000 (
1790.68')

*DRAM POND
_ ....? .. 'ME +,4.000 -
213-000t
(698.82')
SCALE
2o?y i0 0 80 M
SITE -# 17
TOTAL OF 2.3 6 Aa. OF IMPAG 1' TO
SURFACE WA'(K 'D1)E -Tip DRAINING POND.
F M
,ITLORID z
NAD R
T
(?
O J BAR RANCH O

DB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618 '

J ~
r
+20.000 -L-

' 45.000 ;LT)
'
>
C (14T.64
)
A
PROP. STD. BERM DITCH M/
. T

+I ?.
?'_ BERM
BERM DRAINAGE OUTLET
-•- ??
MATTING

-
P.
EST. 1.9
TC7i5ST
S ILTI
W/ m:
A mm M/ _.___________ C
2GI 2G!
t.
o:
o SITE 18
t ?L t
E
I
L
2GI D
TA

BERM GUTTER 2GI M/
FLAT GRATE
MELT } DETAILFALSE 1 SUMP %
40 mm CS M
i 201 F
--- _

LA
iM/6rt
f r/ 12 m? FILTER FAPR IC
C
` A
AT. 'V' DITC
?tt Of ICH DETA
' \
H \ Y 3k
'
_
IL
A
SEE PROFILE
wX_^s
SITE I$
® J BAR RANCH
DB 530 PG 988
DB 453 PG 618
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
20111 10 0 20111 MOORE COUNTY
DLNOTES FU.L IN WETLAND R-210A
8.T560302
46 0 6 A DENOTES TIEXIP. INU'ACT IN WETLAND
n A A 4 A A A DUL TOZtECILANICAL CLEMUNU
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
JJLYOND CONSTRUCTION LIhIITS CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
DENCSTcS ExG°VA7iOnl INI WE:T:aND BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ? OF NOVEMEBER'1997

N.G GAID
xwD a

WOODS
2 FILTER FABRIC\
_. RAP
C>K
2C1 F
O SEE FALSE SUMP
!85 DETAIL 11
,ASF17N PINC 61.29.580
10T 72.07.853. 2096 RT.
H 1 \ 1

N 2 37'
\ \ `
` . • GA WC
aE ?

CS W/
g(I}y? ? 4 W ?t
2 OWS
----------- .. !89
-- # SLO
-
RF
E
A I I
ABRIC
6 ml FILT
R
T. 4. m T N
13 m= FILTER FABRIC
9 E) E)
E)
i. . +40.000 -L- s
45.000 (RT) \???ayo
' (147.64') \ •.?•.\
HORImom-rAL 6 +ALE
D 10 20 AOm
[RE
------- CLC

SiTg /ga.
DeNOTES FILL IN wEitAND.
PENOTMS TEMD I.MPAC.T I-l 1-IF-TI-AND
G T3 YOND C,0NS7KL34T Dnl L MITE.
1
?' ; 51ih jBL?
s.
(T',
WOODS
C
A PR P. AT. l v`
REINFORCII
yy . PROP AAT. ' V %_ DITCH SEELD I TCH DETt
/ SEE PROFILE
Y SEE DFTCH DETAIL 'A' L SEE P FILE\\\\/?
SLOT E ST L E \ -
cn \ y?? \\
,1 \
N N `I \
4: \ 0 OUBLE AX
?. F ? ERAIL ,\
xzl
\ SEE FALSE SUMP
z ?4 \ \ DETAIL III,
-L' . US l N , >t= l93 2G I
\ (EX. DEPTH)
c., cn (F?FLAT 2G I W/
GRf
NO"m NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
?rl ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET ,3g OF S?

W/ 16 m2FILTRFABRIC
????\
r Y
iw-
rT^
HOR17DWTAL SCALE
I RPM
o to 20 ADM
pENJTES FILL IN W£i1AN0.
'•
•
• D£N0TE5:ILLIN 5URFACc 1 ZAT£rZ.
Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q pENOTCSTEMP.I.MPAGT IN'WETLAND
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q DLIcTO MEGNAN1CAL. C.LEAP Ir4C--
6EYOND C,ONS7RuC.T1ON Ljr1IT5.
-51 T4!!5 / 9
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT .
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN Q
SHEET S OF ?Q . NOVEMEBER 1997
>. n
C c,
F &

SII[_ ZU
PROP.
V HEAD DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAILL'V'
c
LAT. 'V' DITCH
ITCH DET IL
3OFILE
r
0
JLUrG taT
PROP. T.
SEE DITCH D
SEE PROFILE
PROP. DOU
\ FACE GUID

V •\ SEE FALSE SUMP
\ DETAIL III
\

\IV
2G I 20? N 37'
O
36.5" E
(? U

_
l 2GI_W1
°F e•°"*?+ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
S
LDER.:? HERD
s DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OF TR ENVIRONMENTALANALYsis BRANCH
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T660302
STAK
? 6'
T US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2176 AT LAKEVIEW =_
=
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET 40 OFEST. 4
1
?
U,4 z "c
1
DTD DAD W/ 47
/ ? • cv
/ .• N

J '"GRID z
HG
/
00

O
0.

'7
45.
.......-._._...??-•--•••-- _PROP. L1T. 0.6 Recc nirru ur /L '.ROP?
tM. 5
1•L?? PER
CIN01E
?••? itEG MA N

•
Ll b 1'
•?'

2GI W/ . [ y ?.? ...
FLAT GRATE •
•
J -
r ! Z,
_•
4 CSW •• ..
L -W '0

CLASS-,B- RIP RAP CLA
W/ 6 ,FILTER FABRIC W/ A.
8
W% 6 m= FILTE FABRIC
W
.11
3L
?r *'^ :0..• bk, is ROP
m
r
z
M
L
A
T
N .
TOE PROTECTION
•/
/
(
lP
I ?,..??
.. SITE 21
3L ?k 3L
?
/
'
~ r •
3k _N:
?` ?Y y ?
? • . _ ... ? _
{- ?
+40:000
r - .'':-•..-...• _
^., :;
-^' -'•?'?-'- -?"-•?.:•
-," Q
.
\45.000 (RT):
'•
A
A
? - ....
•?-.
!
.?`..
?`
•
. C
L
•.-.?` (117a4_)?. - - J ;}??
W/ a7 ml FILTER.-FABRIC
. ,
_.-y •••-

s
• PL ct
`
RE'
?
. \ - -
?
-
-
/ .
.
'
.
, _
'`? ....... _ •
_ .,
_
_..
_ _
.
-,.::;_?:--

REDGA R. THOMAS
DB 133 PG 406
SITE #2l
SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
20111 10 0 2p1,1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DENOTES 19LL IN V/ETLAND MOORE COUNTY
DI;NO1•L'S I.ILL IN SURFACE \VATEIt B.T560302 R-210A
O o O O 6 n p 1)IiPJO7'1 S TISNUI. INII'ACT IN WETLAND PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
^ 4 A n ^ ^ f DUI; TO AIL••CLIANICAL CLEARIN 4:1 CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
BEYOND CONSTIkUCTIONLINIITS MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED_U: S_?1 ^_-

O 0
0
J
PROPe !A!. 'V' QtTl-4 PROP. 'M?/ ?f. ,?•
ea
SEE PROFILE SEE DITCH DETAIL 'R' y
40
-1 /,Oox/,
SEE
SITE ZI
AS If LA
-cl IZ
a 11,
f . T NS :. ., ?(A
V) W 000,
} ms FlITE C ?" ?
Z S
J / X ROP C • 1` R P `
Q _ +0? A +10. -L- P AT.
?_fv
llrn
/r^ DRA H M/ ELS M •` 21. IRTY / EE D CH DETk 'C'
i l L A„ ' sE.
ER FABRIC /'• /"
• - TewxPo2A¢•? llulPPaLTg .
T?LIE Tb T1NlBE2
WotZti MATS
SI TE 21
SCw.E
'Ojai 10 0 201ti
DIENOTL•S17LLINWETL'1ND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DL••NO'P1:S IN. CAVATION LN IVLTLr1ND5 MOORE COUNTY
4 0 6 o G D O DENOT ES T EXU'. I`U'ACT IN W011-AND
0 A uuE YO i.iIECI1ANICAI. CLEAItINO 8.T560302 R-210A
13 EYOND CONSIILUCIION LIIaUTS PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
TEµ? ?uppLr BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
CUE TD OF SR 1825.
TIA MEZ kce? 1,4AT: = 0.2 ha
Al 2? SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 10£ NOVEMEBER 1997
4Z Cs\l. Ola ( I O/ of
r {
NAD ?
N
-r ra Folz&t2..1 kkkpk TS Due 1
Tlu?l3E2 ?c1oP.X AJATS -i-
O
O
K -
SITE 21
•
?• "o. 000 PR P,

D EE DITC
o 0 AIL 'S' 1
`.: SEE QITCH DMF
L

trt U A y j
-
B
•
? •
? ` 8
?
? f °
-? ?
?
?!
?-.
TIER I ?

x r2

D
co
p \ ?J
N

- +}g \ ZIBER14 GUTTER
ELS

l
-L- TS 8/+8/
7
•
AT. Iv, cm
f q `1. SEE PROFILE
fb
SITr?21 K -
SCiU.G
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
20m 10 0 20111 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DENOTI3S 17LL IN WL:TL.LND
MOORE COUNTY
n O t? t) DENOTES I'1i?iP. V U'ACT IN WL-I'"ND
DUL'rO r1L•'Cl1ANICAL CL"tINl7 S . T560302 R-210A
UHYOND CONS'nkUCTlON LLVUTS
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
DErvo??S?ILLiN SUa?A[= WATcn CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Ll OF J ++ NOVEMEBER 1997

? r
J
-7- OZ+ 08 'b1S
o ?
J

0
o
I
i

n:

r

?Z
I
1 O
t - -
o
N
j
T 00
J

r

C

?
.
3J

2
I a?
Z
E
O ?
N
w
Q N
Z
E
00
N
W
0
CL
J
i

I
00 Od 1 1 1
m
tA'1 % ?'& NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Vol
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN -
SHEET Y7' OF 2fff NOVEMEBER 1997

J
O
O
?t-
W
Jr=
-0
V
- v1
I
(Z
_20
N
r o ?
0
I

- o

I N
I -?
Q
0
- M

z/'? I
0 -?
1= i
W I
I -8
I ?
I
v
Q
?I I 0001
rl ?I
w1 ?I ?1 ?i d I
?P
I
? I
w J
Q
v ?
Z
J ? F-
J
O
-N
z
_tn
-O
_in
ci

3
z

W

w
0
I
0
z
o g
3
A
uJ
9-1

¢?
?a
Nai
_>

.a

Q
N
ti
v

??
o?
LJ
0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET A OF NOVEMEBER 1997
q6

rI
- Q
0
vo
co
-od-
NZ
Z
lid
E
O ? - to
M
I
I
ID I

o I -
0
I
P

; z - o
N

? I
d

'' t
1 w
J f; _N G
S V W I - N p 3
1

( a
4 u a
j z 3 %
CG '? T ?
a t a o I -o E
0 3 ? ?

40 W
? o
Z
I a Q o w
i ' s
A Q

ttJJ

.L.i-? p
J I O W
=? ii
N
?
•
-M co '?
•
M _ o •
.
o

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
/ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
' MOORE COUNTY
J S.T560302 R-210A
I PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
I CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS,' AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
?) SHEET A OF •?? NOVEMEBER 1997
44
-?' 00+SS NOI ViS 3NIIHO1dW
I I N
o•sr '
I. ? I •sr N
U a ;O .t f I
5 d
y ' U a
Z',t Z L ' 0?1 1 '' Z r .Z L I
ra.
t I V!
V7
i
I N I
I ? I
s =? i H
W I ra
ou ? ,1 .. I ? ? ,.? w
Z
I r I V: L J
I N ' I ;::?? LL
lu
84 , w ?I o a°o 0
i ? ? ? ?i N p ??? o
,•,
j'` N 3 I ? Qo :':
I r Q
LLow
W I X I WF
-COW
P
N
I o r? I '
I
_x
W
u
uuo
_ N uw006 J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
S.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, SRS2175LAT O LAKEVIEW PROPOSED TO U.S.
pq
a? OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ffOF NOVEMEBER 1997
V1
Z
6
L
W
J _ N
3 0. w•• I? -J. 1
W
dN ,' wi v I E
,', ,VF- N '?•
U O U Q I `,,? . ww i b
U 4 ?/
?- I IN
Ix n
.•,, .. I 1 i I OW - .S
1 Lt J
C o
I O • W
- M C
1? 'J, I W°' c G
•. I y
E { K11 c. =? Z t+
1 >
"ve
IS -7- oa z v u o
I n s
N
86+00
I W ;? ( a a r4
= I w
I j! I a`
r.. 2 o e?
' v I d
s' fo
Tw-
loll
?n• t ? j
S? -7- I r3 ? •T J e 1 i =
I ? N :: f I <1L
m ;
•i? I •- ? r ? L7J
Y UFO
mnwo z ?? I i=•J-
mm? •$,•d I .w°o
t 1 air
oNe
/ • 1 't 1 I
0,40
11 ' ? I U 4
4 v
W
MATCHLINE STATION 85+00 -?'
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A .
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
xa SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 4 OF 'cl NOVEMEBER 1997
yA
s {
S. i-T F, 22-?

11
PROP 'V' TAIL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL V
\ T N
CLASS B RIP RAP
¢Orrm RCP W/ 12 z FILTER FABF
c
.r+

(T

i
-- 4-
GI ?L `I\1SUMP ?2EX. D.PTH)
O? 1
•? 1
t \
.` 23/ ?TYPE "D")
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL 11
400n-fn CSP
` \\ W/ ELBOW
PROP.
----- I L-1

BERM
. STD D I TCH --f-
.
PROP
OF NOerN
t NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
4?
OL TRANSPORTATION
PROP. STD. 8
BERM DRAINAGE OU j DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ;-?
~ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
OFraENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
RAMP C FUTURE PC MOORE I LEE COUNTY
(14.200 RT. ,A- 02*1j v/ PROJECT 8.T560302
=L POT STA. 87+80.O' US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210, A
SHEET U4 OF CA

p N

4 ?
?
PaOP fat \ 1
I? m
C
A 6 \ SEE DITCH DETAIL W'.I
4
k
W/ 78 m FILTER FAB
IC
.?
SLOPE STAKE LINE yyJ C
--
N N
AMP B FUTURE
R
N N in

a

`

0.0 UNIFORM TAPER
`3
- ? p p
DETA[LL II r
-L- US l N /4'5Y090E 6 zo o !,
J :E °l

cn `"
. d RA11P C F?7i/R DETAILLII .
t
?, , -
?.- --
pE SAKf HHE ?_ •4_PROP. 'TD. BERM DITCH .
E
y94
RAMP C FUTURE. \ C
ST
RM AI I WTLET
SC 1+16.

I
+00.000 RP'C'
30.000 (RT)
S C

J

RIM
t
"'
EARNEST C. d AMELIA G. EVANS ?
Y 30.000 IRT)
CkggO?
DS 265 PG 634

l 6

;Z 3 1 1 Jµf :}
I I

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
E W
4 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
??pNSf° ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
EL
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 2175 AT,LAKEVIEW
to North of SR 1825, R-210 A
SHEET5bOF5a
f-
]0. Coo (LT)
.. ..Cc
i
Par
Z _
umptud Tame
SITE*-24
SGILE
200 10 0 20111
DENOTES 1.1LL IN SU11-*ACL %VAT=t
TOTAL OF Q(o h4. OF IMPACT To SURFACE
DUE To DRAINING POND.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. 1
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO NORTHEAST
OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN .
SHEET 4 OF .58 NOVEMEBER 1997
51
51AM
360.000
80 ka1/h

z:.
11CTE rtMS FAM TO nMMK florE sTAR? ` ',
•i- fT.94440 TO -l- fTA.lS+lo LT. /- ??

SITES 25
SCAIk
20lu 10 0 20iu
DENOTES 17LL IN WL'TLAND
DMOTES IMCAVATION IN WETLANDS
O O O O-G O p DENOTES TENU'. I&WACT IN WISSTLANC
DUL' TO AMCIIAMCAI, CL.=UNQ
BEYOND CONX17RUCITON LIbIITS
vC407E5 I''ill iN SUrrACe, WATMS
t
i

I

0o
iP L p
V
O V N N
N Z S, N o O o G o o O ± 0 0
F V .? G C o O G Cl CD C C
FFa77
Z
F ? W
Z O
Q R G O O 00 °o, O°, O O O C O C O
a 6 c c c o o c o o °V c c o
X
W
N
O r ? 0 f O L o ?^f O
fV O .- O 0V G 0 C O G C O
LL ?pW
= Z •'
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 0
J
O -?
F i ? 1 1
F o 0 o e? 0 0 0 0 N o Y m
J
.Wa W V
o O o 0 0 0 0
w o o g o O C.
3 -.L.. G C C C G 0 0 O G O
O W 91. -IL CL SL IL n. a.
O V. E ® 1 w w C C K K w C C V) C
i 0 S F .9 S ?°n S g
N a F O b A b n V r
w ?y
J
co
?u ?u ?u ?tI
4a - W W W W W W W W
a } 2 2 2 Z
O LL w C w ¢ ¢ U (.1 V V o U V V
~IX W I
y - .
W W? O O O O O O O O O O O O
- ? ? ?' ? -eri ao o ao oo m_ yo_? ao a_o ao ao o_
U <S+
J } J J S' r }
a < ^ ig m
N O h j J `} J n ? r` N O h T
t?l KK t'f KJ J?_ F KH F gyn. Ep Ep C-
? i i i 4 i
{{?? H V A A n `f Y !) f v r vOi r r
F O r N V) V In b h b Ol ?, ?N.,
Zl Z

d O ¢

U
.
Q
Y ?
D
N
O 2 S tS
U j _
a
O
G
O
C
O
O
O
O
O

Y

- V
O
O
O
O
O
V
° _
0
O
GI 2
r Q
LU 6i
m
2 m
So

?
fi g
o o
v 0 °
8 S
v 0 0 0 °0
o 8
c
Q
CD
V'
B
x
W 2
N

.?
J

?

' ?
i

a

C1
•

m

O
O

mm
N

C

r

o

G

1

N

O

G

?

r

h

G

O

C

r
O O O O O
O Ed W

V i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
LL
O d
? ? ?

F

?

o
.
?

?

$

0

0

o
.
w

o
•
?

?

0

0
Z
W ? U J
J

3
p
V

O OR

O a

C

O

O

O

p
V

C

C

Q

0
N -

Qo
W
W

E IL CL

0 CL IL

m SL

rc a. gL a-

V CL

a
W
V4F
94
®
? y E Q
Yo v g
g
3' + ??
W 0 n N'
J
co

}

]L
. W
W

!C
W
W

iC
W
W

Y
W
W

iL
W
W

Y
W
W

!C
W
W

]C
W
W

]L
W
W

!C
W
W

1
W

Y
W
W

]C
W
W

]C
W
W

}Q'
5 0 d'
UU d'
U d'
U 6'
U R'
U d'
U G'
U K
U L'
U R'
U G'
U C
U C
U C
U
3 3 ?`
' 3
?
h U U U U {.> U U U U U J V U J
W Or r0 O Or r0 O O FO r0 r0 W O O O
N
Y J J J J J J J J ? J J ? J

H O O G
f m A A n m _ m m G

l'1
+ O
+ ? ? ? O V
+ ? ?
+ O

f FI ?

++ F

+ 1f1

f
N. f
O i 4
O f
Ir A f
^ A A A m m co
W
W O
N 2 r h r m R N N N
H N
,)1
Ado
4 0 u r N a
ot?=I_ w $ o? L
O € = o oof
d V J
z
r
m
2 N
0 0
00 c
4 r o 0
o
sz
N
cs L
cs .9
?L M
Z ZaZ O E
W V
J
O O -?
E
& WW U
U N
)Z 4 ? N
rL O
N
W
a U U
E o
N m iZ O
W N
J
be be
a
r W W
U V
? r
J J
y
O O
to Lo
z
2
U w d'
g
r- J J
o _
N W R

O
C4 1

H = N N

J
LL J
U.
e N

W

W y
r , O

.
' ? =
g ; 5
°
Q a o e z
?

Z
Z
Z = 3
y y O o OF?
OFp OFZ F a OF

Qa az
n
W aW
U
z
a a
az z
U
a T
a
LL
z Z o a o
a
oa ova i
L O c O L Z Z
Z
?O W O
W ?z
?J1 _ 0
y a
QK.
m a ZO
m LL 0 00 O
F
aW
° o
a°
oa 0a
3
~ oo
a : i
?; = w
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-21DA
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING, DRAINAGE. FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. I
BYPASS FROM SR 2IT5 AT LAKEVIEW TO
NORTHEAST OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET .5Q OF .S? AVG 1999
RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
PARCEL #
1 1 CAROLYN D. UNDERWOOD Herling Street
MT Airy N.C.
1 2 PAULINE B. STYERS 36392 US Hwy 1
Aberdeen, N.C. 28315
1 3 ALLIENE TAYLOR P.O. Box 129
Vass, N.C. 28394
1 4 GLEN F.FOSTER P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
2 3 ALLIENE TAYLOR P.O. Box 129
Vass, N.C. 28394
3 4 ELIZABETH H. FOSTER P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
3 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
4 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
5 5 LANNIE FOSTER ESTATE P.O. Box 247
Vass, N.C. 28394
5 6 ARCHIE L.BLUE 2204 Arapahoe Ave.
Catonsville, MD. 21228
6 7 MACK BLUE 461 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
7 7a GEORGE BLUE 461 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 8 RICHARD OLDHAM 420 Main Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 9 DEBRA BLUE KEY P.O. Box 53
Vass, N.C. 28394
8 10 EFFIE MARKS 2235 Crane's Creek Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326
9 11 . KEITH BYRD 660 N. 6th St.
Albemarle, N.C. 28001
9 8 RICHARD OLDHAM 420 Main Street
RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
PARCEL#
10 10 EFFIE MARKS 2235 Crane's Creek Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326
10 12 THOMAS GRIFFIN P.O. Box 613
Vass, N.C. 28394
11 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
12 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
13 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD West Castalia Rd
Nashville, NC
13 13a PIERCE B. IRBY, JR. Church Street
Vass, N.C. 28394
14 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD Aiken Parkway
Fuquay Varina, NC
14 13b MARTIN W. & LUCRETIA P. PINCOCK P.O. Box 490
Vass, N.C. 28394
14a 13 GEORGE & MARY HILLIARD Aiken Parkway
Fuquay Varina, NC
15 14 HAYES L. & DORIS M. HARBOUR 2723 Pepper Mill Road
Sanford, N.C. 27330
16 14 HAYES L. & DORIS M. HARBOUR 2723 Pepper Mill Road
Sanford, N.C. 27330
16 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
_ Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
17 15 J BAR RANCH P.O.-Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
18 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
18a 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
18b 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
19 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE COUNTY
8.T560302 R-210A
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, FENCING
CULVERTS, STRUCTURES, SIGNING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, AND SIGNALS ON PROPOSED U.S. I
BYPASS FROM SR 2175 AT LAKEVIEW TO
NORTHEAST OF SR 1825.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF S8 JULY 1999
r?
?T
RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNERS & ADDRESSES
SITE # WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
PARCEL #
20 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
- Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
21 15 J BAR RANCH P.O. Box 1741
Fayetteville, N.C. 26311
21 16 LILLIAN O. THOMAS Broad Ridge Rd.
Orrum, N.C. 28369
22 16 LILLIAN O. THOMAS Broad Ridge Rd.
Orrum, N.C. 28369
22 17 EARNEST C. & AMELIA G. EVANS Rt.1 Box 196
Cameron, N.C. 28326
22a 17 EARNEST C. & AMELIA G. EVANS Rt.1 Box 196
Cameron, N.C. 28326
23 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
24 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
25 18 ELIZABETH COFFEY Rt. 1 Box 197A
Cameron, N.C. 28326
25 19 DOUBLE D FARMS 1394 L. Cooper Road
Cameron, N.C. 28326

S?A
ZIPRO

37-- - „ar
0
0
_
.

1? • ?{' . '. tom` ? •

14
-
'?;fAOIECi?
64003T- ?
`?
te
? I L
r

low EL
? \ s3

.VICINITY MAP
R10T TO sc"
VICINITY
MAIP S
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
SHEET I OF 3T
> K
MATCHLINE SITE MAP 2
SITE VIII
-Y
NC 24 / C 27 3y1 < 32 -y8-
7
4 /NC. 27
SITE VII
:o
SITE VI
i
RFAO2?31 - SITE V
l5R 0- `
G°N?.
SITE IV
?° P
0- 0.
P
SITE II
SITE I '
-L- STA. 98+90.000 L. B. - s
-L- STA. 98 + 90.000 L.A. (R-21 0B) _
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 6.569003T

C?.
*` iYtiO ?SP?? S
SITE III
Iw o
W N
s`
=- SITE XI
_ ?Oy9cy'Po
V i
TO SOUTHERN PINES
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
SITE MAP 1 PROJECT: 6.56"03T - (R-210B)
US 1 FORM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
/ 99
SHEET ?- OF 3 ?- 8/2
Od.
O
SITE XIV-`
PINE FOREST RE
(SR 1173)
SITE XIII
SITE XII
SITE XVII
Qom- SITE X
SITE I
MATCHLINE SITE MAP 1
SITE MAP - 2
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 1182
/ 99
SHEET 3 . OF 3+ 8/2
U
a
LEE _COUN1y
MOORE COUNTY
-L- STA. 179+45.047 L.B. (R-210B) _
-LREVI- STA. 16+31.750 L.A. (R-210C)
END STATE PROJECT 00
SITE XV
?-- SITE XVI
LEGEND
-WLB- WETLAND BOUNDARY
<L'177*7> WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER

PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
•• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
-0-0-0- CLEARING 0 SINGLE TREE
FLOW DIRECTION
TB
TB TOP OF BANK
'-- WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-? PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- -ems - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
--------- -- WATER SURFACE
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE/ LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 6.569003T (R-210B)
SHEET OFD 8/2/
WOODS LINE
¦ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
I Ana
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
z
44 001,
x
?° 4?0 oN
i z?U H
? .? '. H o .a ° z H o
? ? \ O O a E" ? O
F+ ? U z
MALLORY x.HARBOUR O H
\ l ? ? D a: •? F W
o ?
F
z
- - - - -------------
U t
F
, z z
J J
O O
z z z
a a c
% w
\ ? b U
i MALLORY M. HARBOUR E
O N
. ? b
? o
Q)
z
0
~~ Uft
64
o
x 00
? e x o H o
? , rx ?, ? x
F O W Z

191

0

? a

F
s
--
- ? F
e
m a
z
. , •

?. •
• •?

a ` Q

94
a

to

• ' • '
•

m z
A z
\ ?- • . .
916
CL.
?r?• •
` m a`3 a? a?
?.
• A m m m

SIN38 M'd ONVI

a

N
? Z

? O

P

a

F ?o
64
a to CO
x °
z U F X Q6
c F °
W 0
° °
H
o
0 z

a o a z
° r?-
-- D ? p W
O F w

1
?
z
o

o z
i sn -7- + 9
N w CY
p7

J
V

H

/U 'dOtla <
in ?

00

- - - `- - -------, W
z Od
a
_ J
? e
a
X Cr.
y ^ H
/
C-4 C 8
0
os A

U

N

au1??ou

z .?
o?z `
x c o
Z U H
x w o H o
0
H o a z F o
? a
0;ca °
a z
OE
a
o ° H
00
a
U A a r. ? W
z
WITCHLINE STA. 122+00 -L-
t t + f f +
t ? ? s
1 w
p U
ut i / ? A tea' F
Rl
z e
+ g z z
z o 0
? '? t A Q Q
06 16
.6 IL IN
t
t
e
t
• - * N t
16
00+01
UATCHLINE STA. 121+80 -L-
N
VO
O
E
O

MATCHLINE STA. 1
c3 Q 1 1
N
I
['¦f J I
I
I
,I
11
r
11
1
I
1
i \
1
j
00.8//
t
t/
1
1
- Q I
J
mss' ? / / I
1
I
00.0
MATCHLINE STA. 11
z
0
F
a
t z
it 0
?x
f., O -j
?°,oa
? O

o C
x
C4

eq
\
0
F
a O
H
z
a o
U
00 0 z
F a-

t W ? O
Ca p ?
1 U
1
1 ? z
L
1
t
I ? 0
I

i
I
i
I
I
V?
I
I
!
1
1
1
I
I
D
U
.d
w aFl
t? B
z
06
go rb
W G
zE-4
w
W ?
N
O
E
0
1
z
f?
o ?
a F a Go
U
i J x w c H O
i i /' H p ,Wa o O cz.
W z a °
° o
F°o U 0z -
ab-I 0 w x
1r O A O F W
U a c
/ O
/
/
00-A/
/
/ a
/ Ir,
z o ?,
eaa r
o
/
Itf / / ? N
N
Vl ? / /' W
v /
laz
era ? S' ?? + / / O
E
O
r

z

H
a
a cn

a
?

z
C ?

?

?,
o

?
a
F

w ?
o

z

> ?a
a

o o
o

C^
o a
o
z

c
? °
m

Z
H M
?,
o

m
z
0
N
it
it
0 0
O
O

N
o

o
N ?
(!Ij
0
!il
a2
26z
?H
ze
a?a

a

z ?
o U

•? F
a a
o c?

0 0

0 0

Ln
4 i
N

r17 "M
opmlvis 9 dmvy
fMrIP4I171V PZ 7-
N
.42
rz
k? F
z?
a ?
m
.a

„a U

F .a
O U

N E,
O W

?
N
O O
O
N
001
O
i
i
l
Z

I
/
i
I
I
2
J
!
00
0
lq-
O
q-
0
o z
°
c a x c a
F
c
? O
?
o ?
?
o '
?
?
? z

o H
a
z o

?

o

+ w
A

z >
Q ? ?
a
a ?

cn O F

rn
Pr)

IM4
I*
o P,
O
NN

O
z
o
CIO
cn o ev
' -?"--- ------ - E ?_ oho
M In U
M 1?. C
w W O . C"' 0
• O R?.
h t ?' ?"' ? «? ? z E??'/" O
M
w iir
h d ? 0 W Ri
W p> 0 GT, F W
- 2
z
8
s
• A
o
t? ,fib ? H ? i®d
J
dva dim ,B, ssro (Tl_
TOU An "I MUM
1 3Il VX'1A 030NfOMI-?, \ I W
Vista T lMwG 000 I'M
His" ills ,3du I
i?
ift
0

N O z .?
O ,. 0
m
O CIA
\
O 0.s o a 0?
U
O
o a tn
a O
Qs ° o a E" z
w 12-4 0 ti O
E-4
i Ca Q a ? E- W
U C1. v?
z
c?
o -'
F
ze
w
Qz
i
Q) ? _ ® a
o -c z
N
O O
OO o0 0 i z U
? cv Lf) N
(n CD o w
?; a Z >
W ?4 i O o N
O
i
+
N o 0
} ,
t9 N O 00 z

p °
O i a O ° ao
N Z z
e
x v
w o
? °
E4-

I
' EF
a
> O U
:? "
O O
r? O
F
F
t U Q a .?
cri
I z 1
c?
z
. t
? c
za

?
g
Cf- r O
+

T
W
l w
Z ?
A ?
/\ ?

1 O U
I
? N F

?
t d
O a
W
x
Z ? N
f
.t
I O O
(?)
- O
O E
I

i
?

I

I o

o°.
o

U
z

S
z

o
H
?
m cli

C °

? .?
a" ?
=
v

0 ol
Go

w

cxn

I o
N
.a Q
dz

O cza

?
o

Eno

I

I
..a U
?
t E? ..a
O U
N
%..
O W
j
I x

I
I
I ? O O
I
I

O

O
E
Ln E
Ln

z .?
z
0
? z°F o
o c °z AD
b / ? ?? U A a '"' W
c a
CIO z
to
' - N
?e .tr00L ~
jo. x a
m d
/ F w
toz q D
.
/ IN r r
i------
i
ava ate
w
--- -! ., --------'- -------------------- N
N
f
z .?
it F
C
F F ? ? ? ?

t O
O 3 E5 O ac

F O B :° z F O
I Lt.
a
Q W
o
V
0 z
rr
G > C H F
I U G a
z
I
I
a

? zs

ld +
M

h ?
1
r
? ?
U GLl
/ ..a U

/ F
O .a
U

O W

/ N rt

? O

/ en
M
O
O
•

o?
rn

z k
C4 Ol
0
c? o

o
N F

a
A o
z
?
? ,?

$
? ?

w
C z

a
cz' a

F c

?
Q C "' czl
z

0
(--)j
O
O
N
z
10
Q
O
?N

- o ?
0
LO
2
O
N-
A
A z
gym. E
ze
Az

? U

H .a
z ?
O U

E E
O O

O O
? E
Lr)

b

-
MpTgiLINE STA• 141460 "L ?
os?r t 1 , / z E?
gg I d B
CA z
cr.
Ak H? 1 Ak w
ONO li 1, O O O
I d
Jk Yc I 1 W Q Q A
X I 1 3
Ak I •0
!E
!E 1- ?? le
1 I ? _
aE 1 1v
? ? 1/ l I ? j Lcl
I ?
AE / j BLS I
N
A%k MATCHLINE ST 140+2 'L-
O

x
1 sic \ Z
/\ '4 a,
ri)
I / y ?` x w o Fo cv)
/ a
4 O p W C z N
?i
> C O F
bk 0-4
tk y bk
Nk a
sic R
Z
b o 0
g
?sh 1; L \
1
y? d
!E 5k
7? \ a 1
do ? lk \? _ \ o
\\ a x, ?
_ !k
?' \ \
N Ik

sit z
1 N \ ? O Ca
rT.
CV)
Sc 06
O p a EF O
I /? /' ?` a W O z
6az" O W
?- r
.. a
I*k
Z? O O
tk
Nk /* \ 'L \
/ '!75
1
?. ? ? \\ o w„QO X11 N
1
00.0
1
/ \ 1
d 410
\ 1
r
L V
\. AT. 'V' T \
SEE UITCH UETAIL 'A'
SEE PROFILE 3
1 \
• M
O 1 \
+85.000 -L-
45. 000 (LT)
ROP. R/ C \
U; 1
EST. 10.0 m TONS
CLASS 'tY -HIP MAP
W/ 24 m2 FILTER FABRICS
Ilk-
-`?- F
N ;• a. C3
3uMP -L- US
N 40' 3/' 52. T E
2GI
soo s_-C? RC . 30 ,.E
]NS
T'FR F ARR T C

L
i
N N N ?' LL
. . Z
(l

z C

Z ARE

1A
z

yt 1t0"T? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION ?T
Z

$e ? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH Q
C
G
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825 TO
NORTH OF SR 1182, R-210 B
SHEET24 OF33'} -
a
z
VA 04
a
x
a C
p ry)
x W c i~ O
0
H 8 w 0Z N
"1- 09+65t '1I1S 3NIIH31VM A C 1- W
I Q R. ? W
I '
? I 1
?? I I
mS I I
e I I a
o I I z
?j I 1
1
? I c ? a
? O '?' I p o H
z
oo?l
I ?, F
??? I w ] m
?J? I N oo B
QQ<JW
OIrW ? '
j ? x a a
00-651 9
r r
1 r
? I z z zz
?
i x ? ?.
r I
r ? I
r ? r
r-- 0040/ >; m
I
IMATCHLINE STA. 158+20 -L-
IQ-
S-2
iC

03 z c?
Q 0
MATCHLINE STA. 164+60 -L- x W c ??„ =I-
Fo .a o
/
oz
w z1- o
o a a'Z .?
? 1 i/ C p r?: 0 w
1

z

J I / 1
1 I / /
1 1 J
1 I /

I 1 ..
I
t /
/
a
I
I 4
I U .7
?
I o t ?
N B
I
i
f 1
O ?
U Z
a
C6
1
09/
A Q

l I

d7H VIoG01 f

t U
?
MATCHLINE STA. 163+00 -L-

O
?
E
O
z
0
t
E- ?
a x
z"
c)
0
0 0
EH `"
GaT.I ...
oA
U
z
0
U
w
m
0
U
W
C?
0
w
N
v +w/
Q
a
m E°, o
a zz
a w
T
2
Z
F
v
3i
1 "RQ°• Ri
JAMES ROUSE
a
E4
E4
z
w
O G
Z
z9
a

z
a
w
t
U
E ?
c?
O
E
I O

Oe t
OO.l J
N
?O
\
?00-0/i
H O ?
i
j
,
I
\? 1
(
r
,
,
r
,
,
r
,
r
,
r -
,
r
r
,
,
,
r
r ?
,
r /
Iy
,
5k ,
t
,
,
t4
t
1
1
t
t
,
r
,

j'
J
1
O1
1
C t
J I

O
YI
t
t
I
t
1
t
t
t
t
t
1
,
,
1
,
t
t
rl
t
t
,
-t
t
,
1
t
t
1
O
F ?
F ?
z?
F 0
0 0
E; 0
D
U
z
> ?
z w
PIN
Z-
CV
C4
00
F C4/
h+i rj)
z o cn

to
o
w a
z
o oz
w
o F
a -'

o?
O? .
CI
M
0
F
? s Q
w cla z
? m
s
x
06 0
z zz
c9 o
a
W
J
l<
U
E ?
N
Q)
1

0
1
v
?1I
_I
QA ??
?W?YCS
z vt?
o 0
F r

O

±
N a

z

Q
F a

x

?'

O

c z

o

?
w

?
a a

F

o

?
H

°

x
F

z
?

l)
w
O

F
z
cio

+-

o
a-
w

o j

a w

a ? ?
F
z
?g
?z
9
;z
0
0
0
0 W
C w
z ?
O U
..F
a a
o w
N ?
O
? O O
N
C
N
O ? c
F c?i v? %
s. O
T CT.
0: w ? p w O
L O Z 10 z O
O (J
t a w U O Z C?J
EO-c?
A w •-+ w
U G ? vxi
z
0
a?
r6 Z
gym, E
ze
$ Az
R
o
w
? U a
C
..a U
F a
O N U
0-4
M-1 E'"
w w
o w
T
I ? E
t O O
I
I
•1
I O O
t
L ?
40

.\
/?
OOfBU
Z
O
H

w w

z

M
Od <

N

all \ oo;l
W
to
U
Gr]
..a
0
0
?n

R7
0
x
v
O
w
ti
0
a
z
a
m
u
N
O
z
02
.n c
a co
v)?
O
a G
z o
c z
r
C.
trI"7
6
z
a
?w
F
O
z
m
a a

r r
r ! r
r I - O z
?
,.
00

00
r ? Zo o ?.
\?? ? ??, I ? ?zw o N o M
\ , ? r? I ?;
k 'A
F

z

F

O

OO'1J
I r?
Ewe, w

D G

a
; , r r
I ? r? I r z
NI i
m
rN ,? I
I ,
r

(.., „ ow !

` 1
I 06
E.

? t
r
r
'
! ?
m
Q C
w
A
t V' / '
I 1 , ? .
t
I / •
• I
i r
} I ? ,
I

t I ! a
I 1

ti r t? i ?

1 / ? I a
U

/
t I
r I' I ? O

3u-3 f
m 3.- O U
? / w i i d P ? w
%
. L
r ' I
z km
0 C
tn 64
F r r r? 0 c
3 a a co
z2? ®?
2 W o F o 1?-
F v ..? .? z E 0
1 C z W `°
a
W
F W
' I
I
riZZ00?QZ ?S -NW.?? ? 1? I
1 I
0 1 I ? z
C
1 I ?
T I ..
1
fZlQb?,l S1 ?OI.F (? C6
1 I I ? ?
I I ? ? ? a c
1 I ? ?
I •I
I 1 ? ?
I
1 ?
I r `?- N
I I \
1 I
I r
I ? r
I I
O
E
O
x
Sli E !1
R/W
C
A
° STD. BERM DRAINAGE OUTLET
SEE FALSE SUMP STD• BERM DITCH
DETAIL I 2GI
450mm CS W/( 2) ELBOWS C
l28 N v? SEE
• • FALSE SUMPm
DETAIL
2GI
l O; l32
T
r- cc
Ih N V) N j
in
•
IL cc L
LSE SUMP L
I L I 2GI 129 450mm RCP ti o Q OETA L
_ C
+? /33 2G I
NHN
V +?
EST. l o 8 m TONS N N _
CLASS B RIP RAP FSEE
ALSE S , 1?P V
W/ 6 M2 FILTER FABRIC F °- DETAIL I
P O
ABR I C: 375mm . 2G I
LAT IV' DITCH l34
' SEE- DITCH DETAIL 'A'
SEE PROFILE ,,, :? ,,• ,?
• ; p 7E, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
VII DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROP. F?1w % PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
MOORE I LEE COUNTY
PROJECT 8.T560302
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825 TO
?j NORTH OF SR 1182, R-210 B
SHEET 3 4 OF
• ,1
J

r -C

cr
O
O O
0 co

S? O
Z

n C9 O
ta

w Z< U)
LL
O m

co
W U ? o?
U O O
F- S2 >- S lL
CL > F- F- O
W Z m S
$ F-

I-

?S
CL O
U U $CY) o
M
Z w to Z tL
O
w ~0
0 0 U S
U) w
?
O
?

co aj X

c 3 m

m z WC

1 I I

0 0 0 0 O W O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3w
2 co $ $ o m $
? $ g

HLj

WU
v
d ?

? c E
m
m L
S U
v
c
?
O
O
?
N M ?
m I n
r
• t
K a CD in

C v
? m
a
?
N
? m v

? d

W R N (9. ? ? O r-- C On ?
W
W C O S O M O H O O O t0 to
? =a o 0 o o c o j l
0 0 0
? LL

la =
Z

?CC Fa

m
.? th f N ' O ? O

? N

0 C0t
7
?
0
0
0
p0
0 V

0
?
0
VO'
0
C07
0
?
0
m
N V 6 6 6 6 O 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 C O
? co
?

F-
a rn
°c

2 ?o
t
Q arS
a fl x

m ro
m? o
? c
w
c C:

m

ao

co

O

N

O

r

IA

v

w

h

au

ao

to

ao

n

n
N

?

to

?

l'7

?

?

Fn

o
Fn

?
co

n
- m
_ 0 0 ? •- C < ? N C? O ? N ?i ? ? O
Fl. j O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
O
C
f0
a

N

J J J J ? J J J J J J J J J ? J O J
p p p p O p ? p p ? pp p p ° } ? _
r N
C ?
.0 (?
+ ftO
t aD
t N
t O N
+ t 0
+ 0
+ + t0
+ 0
+ 0
t
` a
0
+ $ + o +
ja O M IT
N + tn N to - O tn O 7
to O)
tO + ?
O
? O O ? ? N cr) cn IT tn tO to C7 ? 0) !

i

t S

t

i
t t t t t t t t t t t t t ,?, 1

C .- N M < tA to 1- OD 0 ? ? N ? -? ?
Z
S
W
F-

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
MALLORY W. HARBOUR 2723 PEPPER MILL RD.
SANFORD NC 27330
2 JAMES F. ROBERTS PO BOX 209,CAMERON NC 2832`6
3 CLINTON & KAY PEELE 628 BOYS CAMP RD.
CAMERON NC 28326
4 ROBERT C. MARTIN PO BOX 34
CAMERON NC 28326
5 ALBERT-& DEBRA HALL PO BOX 148
CAMERON NC 28326
6 RAYMOND & BETTY RIETZEL PO BOX 133
CAMERON NC 28326

7 HELEN HINSON PO BOX 63
CAMERON NC 28326
MARIE MCKENZIE PO BOX 1656
PINEHURST NC 28374
8 SAMUEL & KATHY STOUT 272-B PINE RIDE DR.
WHISPERING PINES NC 28327
9 JAMES & ELLEN ALLEN 5201 JEFFERSON D. HWY.
CAMERON NC 28326
10 ARCHIE BROOKS 5109 JEFFERSON D. HWY.
CAMERON NC 28326
11 LEONARD PRINCE 767 W. ROSSLYN AVE.
FULLERTON CA. 92632
12 CLEO D. BLUE 461 MAIN ST.
VASS NC 28394
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MOORE / LEE COUNTY
PROJECT:6.S69003T (R210B)
US 1 FROM NORTH OF SR 1825
TO NORTH OF SR 11.82
SHEET 3? OF x;'
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES
ADDRESSES
13 JACK C. MAXWELL
14 OSSIE B. KELLY
15 WADE GODFREY
16 LARRY GODFREY
17 CSX RAILROAD
18 LINDA LEE JUSTICE
19 CURTIS SMITH
20 CLARENCE INGRAM
21 ROBERT COLLINS
22 JAMES ROUSE
23 LILA R. DOUGLAS
PO EnX 2145
SANFORD NC 27330
8128 CEDAR LANE
SANFORD NC 27330
738 ARDMORE DR.
DEARBOURN HEIGHT, MI 48127
6427 ROCK FORK CH.
SANFORD NC 27330
500 WATER ST.
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202
7720 CHRISTINE LANE
CAMERON NC 28326
PO BOX 321
VASS NC 28394
PO BOX 534
VASS. NC 28394
6439 ROCKY FORK RD
SANFORD NC 27330
PO BOX 2115
SANFORD NC 27330
PO BOX 496
SANFORD NC 27330

Le111.+ey
.3
Mil 1111
it
17
1/.
lit
G ?o 'J
73'70' /
?r .
0

liffi 1 1 ! i
? 1'?
, GPpFR ??
- 1147 4
.C106
1 U 1179
llil
N
_C
`J x

35
_ 11{0 L? 11•
v
1716

Q
\ Vl?
L "I, 1177
n
. ' J112 4 ? •t. "
AS •8
I,u

1 om 1. Its
1 ?: ? 7I -O fY/IIQe/ I
/
5 1177
78
)L1
/ / 110
J
{..
117{ 1171 Im \
? '
\ 1 Clr/?•? I

Li
/'uil 1167
p
`
n.. •:v1 7
1'
17
I
117.
,J {17 II.) / 33'70•
11? 1,
I
I
J
\. C. DEPT. 03
.171 / DIVISION OF
1117) '° .' LET, l'OUNTY
PROJECT: &T-560502 (P-0210C'.1
i 1-'S I FROM SR 1'192 '1`17) SR 1484)
1 0 7 .WILES I S'C3L"3'I-l OF :iA.\3'('RD
0 OS 1 WlF SLI=i??.r ' 0 Zjr
D.B M .b K I llii _
0 10 2r, 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
-
59
z

o
ell
o

4
ci
'?oo' = Z

3NIl
H:)IYW
z
?"
a
® -,
q
0
z ? z O'l 04?wLn
FZI ?r
W M 00 cn
° p U F p O
a
; c
n

o fi o a ?' w
^? w
U zz

o to i
+

i M -
} N
NN' lV

00+0L m X
N
_J +-
N

cn

LO
:
o
+
M

-s

N
a
+
O ,o
H w
a ? M d

Z ti
?O o
W
;
m ?
L
J
i

Ln
r

0 x ?I

el ? (fj r i:?

z z o ; ?o
F cL U
O
O

n
Z F,
co C
o?c J E.. 0 .a U p M

Z
roc 0.
C
; W
p
c:.
0
a ° c D CC .W

Q
?? z

it . i ti

o I?

W o
O
1 + ?
w
CL 0%
LO
? oo+os

W N
^
O
04
J ^?

ci m
O d

4)
•-

N

N

m
N
oo+or
O

N

3NII H:)IVW °o

0

0

Lam - iL
-WLB b,E-L?:;D ',JNDARY PROPOSED PPID_-

WLB? WETLAND PROPOSED BO'' -UL VERT
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
® SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
¦ DRAINAGE INLET
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
ROOTWAD
WATER
•
' DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
•'•'• CLEARING

?-- f- DITCH RIP RAP
?- FLOW DIRECTION
TB ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
?. TOP OF BANK 5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
WE IF AVAILABLE
-- EDGE OF WATER
- -C_ - PROP. LIMIT--OF CUT
X X X X X LIVE STAKES
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY BOULDER
-
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND - - - COIR FIBER ROLLS
- - PL- - PROPERTY LINE
E - TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB - EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
- _ D - WATER SURFACE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.T560302 (R-0210C)
US 1 FROM SR 1182 TO SR 1180
SOUTH OF SANFORD
JAN 1998 REVISED JUNE 1999
IHEET ?F OF Z

F
\ ? C7 FZ
\ ??`?`. z x z c CO
\ ? . ? , cG cz O c r, ?
\ ,. ?I \ y O O czt F F
00
41 9
\\ \ ` ? ? ?\\ Z ? ? can
s
v co F
Z
Cl)
. r
U
\ F ? 1 $
\ 1
? I ? I z z
d
I ?
\ i rn ?
I 1 , F F C
?? I I\ z z w
F„ ?' _ I I \ a o ?
N I k !C I ' ?
I ' Mt * sY
I / M ilt

c
z z ?, 00
\ \ t? N M t >
\ 1 ?, w
4R
w a?00
/ U 0 O
a ?, z
/ ?'? ? Cllr
W
r I "I V
aJG y? ' ? ? Cn
O m I ? . °? b
-gel
C'Y \ 4, 124 O
A
W
-?i \
J
J
m QO W O• ! \ ,
W Q?
3 • UU
z
z z
F z in
LL z e z
i \ 1
t'? \ I ?z U)z
//? \\\I Z m m z
' ? ?\ o 03 0?
F,
0
r ?

z
O ,o
LO 24
04
a x ? ? ? ? o
F• O U ? ? C ? Gt,
O
?g F
a ? ? 0 0 ao
O u ' ~ ti LT. Q E
a
z x
I
C4 ?.. 8
M ?: ! I ? U
?' ?? I 1111 ? N
I I ? I
I `'I
o
? I ? I ? I
I s I b? I `
J ? I I l c z
mO I I ? I ?
w ? i ? ?__ 3
? i I I ?
I I ? i ?.
ftl
F
O
z
0

N N N N N
M N = O 6?
0 ^`
Z

o = O

C"i ?
E-' cz.
O O
U c '' , N
'
F A O w
C

F O
c~n .a F
U ? E"' 40
O O
O

>
w U
zz
z ti
J

W O
O ?o
O
O
L
+ aorss
L
_ O
? p
z
?c
0
N o3
z
oz
? 0 0
M
r?
?Jl J
O
? b

.a
rn
>
w
Q a

F U

a
r o z
Q0 O U
w N

o C

0 O c:V
+ p
O
O
O
00
O

l
O
E E
Lo Ln
cNV N N0 (c YI-J)
N
N
z o
I - I F?" aoz
a
a / V) 0 F Z W
9 :,„ Q o
E-p U? w C ce C
11v '?-.. F ? .a U ? H
Q ; 0-4 O
a tn z
I I1 ;I ? v
? ?M
I Z I ?+ o
I ?I ? N
I ? I
? s N I ? ? p
a I .? I? Q
a I
I
.
z
J
41
// . I LQzI
I: a N
?? '??? 5 I: z zw z?
/" ?? zl M O Ors pro OC
I ? ? O Cv?i pia GU
I
LI\
O? I I
? I

0 co C,
jp (1 133HS S 311S 3NIl HOiVY4
I z C4 04
z
- mss, -NMI , iza o- - - a 3 I '?' z p oo
=____ I W Y 11 ::?I a w
?? I o I Fpv ? ?o?o
a o
o
I I I cv a z s
W J cn
0 o i ?: I, z ti
w n. _I
W
N I I:
10
? i
I
I ?
° I
J
JN Q
Za -Jw I N
a? o0o I
?o n.w
aW
MN % • J I I Q)
14 O • I Im
N 31 i..l
-j 3 •' XI I I?
LLJ
z
LLJ
= o I X fA
w z
- -' F z o
-?I ?.. -- I I I 3 0 N
•.
•(y' I I z z
=I .? I I tom, F ?
al _ I ? I ?z cL a z ?
In Z
co c ml I v' F F rz F V F C
3 ``i I II I ° 0 3 0 U. o f
x o cz cv0, cU
' o
U •
w O •
W N
X •
W
p • •
•
• •
c
ca ? ?'ati
E5 p p
a m ..
p6 A
? C7 F ?
Z
F p U? ? ? ? 0
E? p ""a U
? F
D 1-4 O LT. 0 F
U ca a .? W
Sz 30 ZI 133HS S 3115 3NIl HOiM
I III
W
N
I I '-1 0
o 'I N
I 1?
NI 1 I Z -
O00 ' w IN
ow o IX
I / I
Ul) <oJ ? W
owa I ? ?
Z
W Qw
w
?aN I I y
w I i G
Z I G 'f" F
z a
I ? I a ° N
z e zW
x z d
W tycl F ? U Gya
?j I I C F? F? F
\ I I w zz 3 °z cc z
r:: I G Gz A vii O
? 1J I .
riM Ow1STx3 • •
Q -
•
s"Z' 30 01 133HS b 3115 3NIl HO1dW •
r s
c
O 00?r
Ey 4 ? ? q ?
z
z ~ z c
0) > N
?o
r?
E O I.W. V
; co
G'> C ?° W
U D 0. .? czl
z ,
i
w
U
? a--1 N
? o
?I
O
W
W
i
ca
i
w
N
0
z
F
w
a
30 11 133HS S 311S 3NIl HDiVV4 z
h
w
F
O
z
. w
0

/

1
M
o
i-
I
"' ? I 1 I
?
? ?
I l I

Q
re)
N
0
M
c

r?
v 0 0
Q
r? ? F y
r
a
E
-? p U y C ? O
E ?

w ? ?? a; O ? F.,

z
ti
0
N
0
0
0
o Wj -
0
? N
? N
0

0

o
o ?

o

o

0
Q
zv>
o°
Q
?
QJ
?F-
aw o
U3 t!)
X
WZ
O
uo
Q
z
0
H
d
z zz
ry H a F
E- Cr2 ca
za zit
oz Qz

c?
J
U

„a U

F J
z ?
O U
N ?
C ?
O GJ
x ?

Q Q

O O

? Lr)
N N
RIFFLE SECTION (A-A)
(Not to Scale)
FLOODPRONE-?, - BANKFULL CHANNEL- = 1.8m ?If FLOODPRONE- ? BERM '
TERRACE- TERRACE ISm
WIDTH VARIES tSEE PUNS1 WIDTH VARIES (SEE PUNS)
PROPOSED R/W DEPTH VARIES DEPTH VARIES
(SEE PUNS) ? ??- --?
LOW FLOW (SEE PLANS)
19m CHANNEL
NATURAL - ltd VOQE
GROUND ? - GRADE POINT 5
0.3m y oj5m
-?- OJSm ?a
Obm -?I
• - NOTE: STABILIZE BANKFULL CHANNEL BANKS
AND FLOODPRONE TERRACE WITH
SODDING AND NATIVE VEGETATION.
BED MATERIAL OF LOW FLOW CHANNEL
SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SOILS.
Q CQ Q
A-A: RIFFLE SECTION
B-B: POOL SECTION
(Not to Scale)
SITES 4 & 5
NATURAL CHANNEL
DESIGN DETAILS
-1 W Q

POOL SECTION (B -B)
(Not to Scale)
BERM
FLOODPRONE ?- BANKFULL CHANNEL- = 195m FLOODPRONE
TERRACE- TERRACE-
WIDTH VARIES WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLANS)
PROPOSED RiW (SEE PLANS)
? DEPTH VARIES
DEPTH VARIES LOW FLOW (SEE PLANS)
NATURAL 1.5m (SEE PLANS) CHANNEL
GRWND GRADE Po/NT ? FlV'
?.r 2a 12:1
r 0J5m
Dim
OJSm \a ? 1
0J5m I 1
gi Ohm T
J ? o6m t
POOL DEPTH -? ' - NOTE. STABILIZE BANKFULL CHANNEL BANKS
OJSm DEEPER AND FLOODPRONE TERRACE WITH
THAN GRADE POINT.
TOWARDS DS OUTSIDE SODDING AND NATIVE VEGETATION.
OF MEANDER BEND. BED MATERIAL OF LOW FLOW CHANNEL
SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SOILS.
POOL PROFILE
CHANNEL BED (Not to Scale)
% POOL TO BE EXCAVATED
i _
?---- OiSm j ' 0 Sm L?-
2m 6m 2m
SEE. PLAN VIEW FOR POOL SPACING
SITES 4 & 5
NATURAL CHANNEL
DESIGN DETAILS
t !

(W bkf /d ikf)

02 1.7 cros 1.7 cros 1.7 cros

- EXISTING STREAM IS BRAIDED THROUGH MOST OF
ITS LENGTH, SOME DATA IS HIGHLY VARIABLE.
NATURAL CHANNEL

DESIGN DATA
SITES 4 & 5
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LEE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.TS60302
US 1 FROM SR 1182 TO SR 1180
SOUTH OF SANFORD
JAN 1998 REVISED JUNE 1999
SHEET j&_ OF

ITEM EXISTING
STREAM REFERENCE
STREAM PROPOSED
RELOCATION
STREAM NAME Tributary to Little
Crone Creek Tributary to Little
Crone Creek Tributary to Little
Crone Creek
DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 76 ha 76 ha 76 ha
CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 1.1% 1.1% 0.9%
BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 1.7m - VAR,. 1.7m 1.8m
MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.2m 0.2m 0.18m
BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE
f 0.33m2- VAR. 0.33m 2 0.36m Z
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO 8,5 -VAR. 8.5 10
Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.31m 0.31m 0.3m
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area
f e 45m 45m ISm
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 26.5 - .VAR. 26.5 8.3
CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 sand sand sand
SINUOSITY (K) 1.1 - VAR. 1.1 1.2
MEANDERS:
AVG. LENGTH VAR. 13.8m 14.Om
AVG. AMPLITUDE VAR. 2.6m 2.6m
AVG. RADIUS VAR. 5.1m S.Om
DISCHARGES:
0 BANKFULL 0.2 cros 0.2 cros 0.3 cros

pIp 3.1 cros 3.1 cros. 3.1 cros
VELOCITY:
V BANKFULL 0.56 m/s 0.56 m/s 0.35 m/s
VZ 0.61 m/s 0.61 m/s 0.80 m/s
VIO 0.71 m/s 0.71 m/s 1.01 m/s
CLASSIFICATION D5/E5 E5 E5 2_5 1

z
o
?? F a F z c
w
-? N
Eay CT. U F O a o
O
? -F -7t w
sl . I
c
V
z F_ . I ? I z
> f
t
W r
M Z Z ? C
F ?
fL M a C7
yw cnZ
°z z z
a c? cv
• w
.
a
r
jr
1

•
.
r'
?I
I

AO
O+
O
C 3 c "'
64 cs! O O
F z
00
F p U F a O a O
W
O
U G a ? W
Z O ? cn
WI W
a I I : I`
I N
r
jc ? •r \ X31 i I . • ?
• cal
Z
I I ? o
8 741
I I
J I ?
Iv1 u I \ S
u
c
s
z
I } I I z ?
W i~ F c?
0 .0,
p au
.
.
.
41?- 1
O
oa ?y
FO O
a x
zc?F z
? z 6 C4
O M .00.? vi > n
r?z, O OV F O W p
O z cWzt °•°• x
z?
? z O. ti
F
c
a
m
U
'SIN
uI O
" I
O W
r
s v I I = F z
3 F
z > z a
a Uz ° .aF
F
? wa inv.
C
z zzz zod
o cr cv?,

z
F rn u
ti
O y, O O
z.C?7
? N
F p U C W0
F; "a u o O
12. Iw O
V Q oa. ? ?
N?
.. / SR 11? / .. pIM
sit
1-01
?bp /
x Y W` -Ot
/ \ \ 0 J O
U
\`? V o T V)
r N
1 ? .
Mi y\ \ z
a
X30 \ .
Ol X301 \ ?
\u
W
w \
M W s a "11
00 z C
F
W) U _
O L C
zrz
0
car.

g (? V)

a w
~
m 3 1
o +
a` ? ui
+` I U-
I
/ 1 N I
/ ? 1? p I

4
W , I I
? ? II
I I: I I I
o .. I II I
/ : al
? - 14- -"'1 II I
II I II I

d
o ?? ® N
LL p
E=4
o
\\

1; I . .
WI/ ?
F
A
z
e
a N
z z? z
c
F ?
z
o. o? oe
p Gv?i AU
•

z c

c

wl)
? G

M 00 W K
F C ? ;? ? w > w

W F ? O w

a p
O
F" O ,Wj 0o
E"
U F n

a n
"'
n O
p n

rd
G
C ON &W
z

W
U

? N

b O
? O

Lf)
4

•L
CA
in
z
F o
? N
z z? c
F Z
?' fz. a ? C7
y ? W m Z
Lr]
z za zw
in aW) GU
•
s •
s
•

PROPERTY OWNERS
.KCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS
14 TALMARS A. KNIGHT RT. 1 BOX 0070
BROADWAY, NC 27505
17 NED W. KELLY, JR. 4717 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
18 JAMES E. BLAKLEY 4728 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD,* NC 27330
19 JAMES E. BLAKLEY, JR. 312 WESTOVER DRIVE
SANFORD, NC 27330
21 JAMES C. DULL 4622 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
25 DEXTER COX 4508 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
27 HARVEY J. HOLLAND 6324 WILDLIFE RD.
SANFORD, NC 27330
30 SEIGMAR MEIER 228 SEAWELL ST.
SANFORD, NC 27330
31 LUTHER D. MADDOX 5709 MOCKINGBIRD LN.
SANFORD, NC 27330
34 CENTRAL CAROLINA JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
AVIATION, INC. SANFORD, NC 27330
PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS
37 MARY C. CHANDLER 8029 EAKES RD.
SANFORD, NC 27330
39 DOWELL EAKES 8024 EAKES RD.
SANFORD, NC 27330
43 JEROME PETTY 4173 JEFFERSON PETTY HWY.
SANFORD, NC 27330
49 WENDELL L. JOHNSON P.O. BOX 2742
SANFORD, NC 27330
50 PAR NINE INC. 5634 QUAIL RIDGE DR.
C/O JAMES B. PARRISH SANFORD, NC 27330

in a U)
cli

C)
o
r
1-- 04 cm
U
co
rl
Q
N

N
?
CO
O Q
3?
CL
04
Z=j
ati
) co
V
U
W
co
O
O J co
H
U it
00 w
LL?
r Go

O
U
a
D
z
z L?
?j

W

LL

j.L v

(n r

C- 8 N

w c

5 N E E E E E E

V
? ? 04 IT
L O 0 0 ?
c U
w

d
w
N ? ? co
O
U N
? ?

Q
g c °1
_ c O co
Q
? ? co N LO
? W U ?

3 =

U ay

Q v
? c
`

C co
N
M
C L
a O O O

w 0 0 0 O O O C
C
L
Z v O C O C O 0 0
C

r ? ? C

O ?
•C•?
O O
C cv)
O
0
0 0
O
H
O
?
C V d,M- 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 C ? C C

V) y
O ?
C
V
Q m t6
> O N
O r
r 'sr
r r
O CO
N

•= -

v O O O O O

? X
?

O
Z N

w E
v
3 ?
a?
?- c
N
C
C
?.
f4L ?
r Op
?p O
r M
M f?
O O
r O
M ?O
O M
0 N
0 r
0 M
CO
= O C O C C 0 0 C C G O N
>
n ? n c m a
• a
• ' .
' a
' '
a a a a a a

?
0 0 0 0 0 0
? o ° o o °

r ?
r
r
r ?
r LO
r

O e
r r
N r
N ?
j r
d r
N r
N r
d ? ?
j
m ?
>
C
O
• ? }
? Q.'
J Q'
J N
Q' Q'
J Lt
J I=
J 0:
J ?
r N
Ix e d
Ix
l9
+2

? O
p ?
0 ?
0 J
? ?
0 ?
0 ?
0 ?
0

' ?,,
?
O J } J
v C
D + O O N + p O ? p
N + N i
O
r ? N + M C07 st ? O + p +
N M O Go
'
d• Q
w
Z
r
N
M
V'
M
co
fl.
co
W
?
?
? ?
0
rn

LL W
w w H M O
W
4
APPENDIX C
Little River On-site Restoration Plan
Ak
Little River On-Site Restoration Plan
Improvements and Widening to US 1
From North of Lakeview to South of Sanford
TIP No. R-210
e.. SrAtYe?
?r
s ?•
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Natural Systems Unit
February 2001
A
1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a four-lane
divided freeway tying into the existing US 1 four-lane facility south of Camp Easter Road (SR
1853)/ Aiken Road (SR 2175) in Moore County to Wild Life Road (SR 1180) in Lee County. As
part of the project mitigation, a restoration effort will be undertaken at the current US 1 crossing
of the Little River.
1.1 Wetland Resources
Wetlands were delineated by NCDOT consultants using the "Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual" (1987). Mr. Jeff Richter, of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington
office, verified the delineation on March 2, 1995.
The Little River and the associated wetlands within the floodplain are very high quality. Despite
the construction of a 1308-foot bridge, the proposed project will impact.4.7 acres of these
wetlands. A temporary bridge will be used to construct the bridge over the Little River and the
wetlands.
1.2 Summary of Mitigation
Construction of the 1308-foot bridge over the Little River and floodplain coupled with the
removal of the existing US 1 bridge and causeway will allow NCDOT to restore 6.4 acres of
floodplain and wetlands. The 6.4 acres includes 4.3 acres of fill that currently makes up the
existing causeway (areas la, 2a, 2b, 2c) and 2.1 acres of remnant fill (areas lc, lb, 3) that was
likely deposited during construction of the existing road. Besides restoring this 6.4 acres back to
its original elevation, the hydraulic connectivity of the active floodplain, which is currently
blocked by the existing road and causeway, will be restored. In addition, 8.4 acres of adjacent,
remnant wetland parcels are being included as a preservation component.
2.1 Site Description
There are many parcels making up the site. Each parcel, as well as some other areas, has been
assigned a circled number and the acreage calculated as shown on Figure 1. Following is a
description of each area:
1 a - Existing road bed on the west side of the bridge and extending back to the wetland
boundary and proposed end bent
lb - Filled area within DOT right-of-way that will be restored to existing floodplain elevation
l c - Filled area beyond DOT right-of-way that will be restored to existing floodplain
elevation
A
2a - Existing road bed on the east side of the bridge and extending back to the wetland
boundary on either side of the old road bed.
2b - Small sliver of road fill that is beyond DOT right-of-way that will be restored to existing
floodplain elevation
2c - Small sliver of road fill that is beyond DOT right-of-way that will be restored to existing
floodplain elevation
2d - Remnant parcel of existing wetlands and a portion of the Little River that will be
preserved
2e - Remnant parcel of existing wetlands and a portion of the Little River that will. be
preserved
3 - Filled area within DOT right-of-way that will be restored to existing floodplain elevation
4 - Wetland impacts that will be avoided by construction of the elongated bridge
5 - Wetland impacts that will be avoided by construction of the elongated bridge
5a - Wetland impacts that will be avoided by construction of the elongated bridge
6 - Remnant parcel of existing wetlands that will be preserved
The floodplain wetland adjacent to the Little River is characterized as bottomland hardwood
according to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management; Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands (Report No.
96-01, 1996) but also has many trees typical of swamp forests. Dominant vegetation includes
water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica), willow oak (Quercus phellos), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum) and bald cypress (Taxodium distichium).
The soils are mapped by the Soil Survey of Moore County, (NRCS, 1995) as the Wehadkee
series, which is a hydric mineral soil that forms from recent alluvial sediment and is frequently
flooded.
2.2 Methodology
The goal of the mitigation plan is to re-establish a wetland community as described in the Field
Guide to North Carolina Wetlands. The 6.4 acres identified above and shown in Figure 1 will be
graded down to an elevation of 74.5 feet, which is an average elevation from the surrounding
floodplain wetland. The area will then be planted as detailed in the Wetland Reforestation
Detail Sheet, which is attached. It is anticipated that this will restore 6.4 acres of high quality
floodplain wetlands and restore much of the historical sheet flow of floodwaters across the flood
plain.
Most of the grading work is expected to be performed in Spring 2004 since traffic will have to be
maintained on the existing road until the new facility is completed. Therefore, the planting and
monitoring will not take place until the 2005 growing season.
2.3 Monitoring
Hydrologic monitoring will occur throughout the growing season in the wetland area. Two
groundwater gauges will be. placed on either side of the river in the restored wetland. Hydrology
will be monitored by using 40-inch groundwater gauges. Success will be based on saturation or
inundation within 12 inches of the soil surface for a consecutive 12.5% of the growing season
during years of normal rainfall.
Vegetation monitoring will be based on visual observation of plant establishment and recorded
using photo reference points. Stem count, species composition, and plant health will be recorded
annually at the end of the growing season. Success will be based on survival of 320 trees per acre
in year three with a target survival of 260 trees per year in year five.
3.0 Mitigation Credit
The site is expected to generate 6.4 acres of restoration and 8.4 acres of preservation. All of the
wetland preservation and 4.7 acres of the restoration are going to be used to compensate for the
4.7 acres of high quality impact that will result from construction of US 1 (TIP R-210) across
this floodplain. The remaining 1.7 acres of restoration is anticipated to be used to compensate
for impacts associated with the Sanford Bypass (R-2417).
3.1 Final Dispensation of Property
NCDOT will retain ownership of the mitigation site until all monitoring requirements are
fullfilled and an appropriate recipient is identified. If and when the deed is transferred,
restrictions will be placed on the property to ensure protection in perpetuity.

[`cd m n m m z
z c? O
0-4
a
ox=
N N N N ? d
o
to o AAA
E" H
C SFS on
"0 o C 16 C
c ? F 3 U
96
m
m y S y r
c
v $fi IM 16
MUM i MOM
z
a
z
00 Z ?
m
I
?? \ 1 rl
S Ln
+• I ?i. ' + , S 1 1
--
??
c G.oo \ , I
•
7> Cr
,D d V -I rr. ??. F \
• 41 ?a[u I-'1 1
On' o
11 II II II II II II II II II II II II II _'?•? '(/• - , - --J ,
CD gaaaa - -
CrI
Y
fY
/ r
cn cn w ??? oi,
(3) w cn ca cn CO p -4 o w (:F)
A W CD ?J O -3 N Cn .A 00 O 00 00 C p?NpA ? ° C)
v C7 0 -A cn m w w N w -y co A &? 9 ar( ?, {
D n
m C7 C) 37 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 n CD')
m ??
m m DO DJ M X X -M -M :13 X S T t
m m m m m m M m m m m m R-0
cD v
03 1 1 /. ?? .
p p p ?. G q
O O S7 - -
m m m I • a ?? ?.
?\0 D -1 m U 3 J O - I -u I Y ?. 1 I
rn z O X -n m O / .
+ 0
-A p H O : l-
N m m r C O O -u
CI) 0 3- Z 1-4 H H Q] O •' ' 1'> ,, •.1
+ --1 Er. m ---1 m , F
D p r 0 r 1D p
• H z m z a6,p ?i I I I• ?.-
z D o 0 W m
O m H H D ? ?` ° J ?? 3
UI O < Z 0
N c7 H m z G) Z
O S Z 3 .7
+ D D r m O f?-1
rn z r 0 8 r`?,1 fhb
m U) a: 0 90
r- DJ z m
_ G0 H W O'Nn 1 i ;? \
CA) X
Do m
rn m m p 1•
ry rr _ _ _.
01
? ? ? ;(1Y? t? ? 1 •? "' ?, ? old
°, 1-: .
Nil

w
7
I
m
S ?
d F
h ?
i V ^
?o
?o
? a
i u
C
U
i' Z E
O FF
i a
? r F
z
? a
e
? a
a
0
a z
H?
A?
z
a
a?
I
i w
S
i W
o.
.? m
fcl: ?o
d
C m
1 E °_
N y
I ?
1
? UUUa ? p
2 0.

O

F
F

0

?j

m m m m mm
Ep EE E E
E E ? E
a
1 a
I s
1 ?
1 s ?Ov
1 1
o E
S 6 6

R
a
r
?
A
?
0
V
O 0.1

?
c

U a

U

s
x

?'
220 V1
O
y C7
an h

6

y h ? per. N N N N
R
Fd'
LTI W?
s
e
o
LL
?^O
t
a
Om
E

z

v I ? 1111 ly

y
r.

.r /W\
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Ar!
W April 1, 1999
NCDENR
Mr. Dave Timpy
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
JAMES B. HUNTJR:"'= US Army Corps of Engineers
GOVERNOR
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Timpy:
WAYNCMCCev1TT
SECRETARY
Subject: NCDOT Project #R-210 C/A/B
Lee County
?i
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North
Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is willing to accept
payment from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT )for stream impacts associated with the subject project in
K.; accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the
NCWRP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Based on information
supplied by the NCDOT in a memorandum dated March 26, 1999, the
impacts associated with the subject project are as follows: 9,000 of
streams. Assuming a 2:1 ratio for compensatory mitigation, the
NCWRP will provide the amount and type of required mitigation '
Cataloging Unit 03030004 of the Cape Fear River.
If you need additional information I can be reached, at 919-733-
5219.
.._?..L. Sincerely,
.ate Ronald E. Ferrell
Program Manager
- Wetlands Restoration Program
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
David Robinson, NCDOT
k 4?
P.O. Box 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
-PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
x yi..r.-.. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
1.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINE?
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO March 17, 1999 pu
Regulatory Division
ACTION ID. 199300570, TIP R-210, US 1 Relocation, Moore and Lee Counties, North
Carolina
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference the January 13, 1999, agency coordination meeting at the property known as
the Taylor Tract, adjacent to the Little River, Lobelia, Moore County, North Carolina. The
purpose of this meeting was to examine the property for waters and wetlands and to determine if
the site would provide suitable compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable impacts to wetlands
associated with the relocation of US 1 between Sanford and Lakeview, Moore and Lee Counties,
North Carolina (TIP R-210).
As discussed with Mr. Michael Wood, we feel that the site may have merit as providing
compensatory mitigation for the referenced TIP project. However, the final decision regarding
the use of this site for a particular TIP project must be made during our review of a particular
permit application and subsequent public interest review and 404(b)(1) Guidelines compliance
analysis.
Based on our review of the property, including an inspection of several drainage ditches
constructed perpendicular to the Little River, we agree that some alteration to the property's
normal hydrologic regime has occurred. However, we cannot concur that the drainage ditches
have sufficiently altered water movement through and across the site to the extent that the
wetlands have been drained and no longer meet the hydrology parameter as defined in the "1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual". As discussed with Mr. Wood and your
consultant, Dr. J.H. Carter, Ph.D., we feel that an assessment of the extent of drainage that has
occurred on the site should be an important component of the restoration plan. We strongly feel
that goals of the restoration project should be clearly stated and that the extent of the restoration
and enhancement potential on the site can be clearly identified once this baseline information is
known.
-2-
As the wetland and stream impacts associated with the relocation of US 1 between
Sanford and Lakeview (TIP R-210) are substantial, it will be incumbent upon you to document
the type and amount of restoration, enhancement and preservation that is attainable on the site.
Finally we offer several specific comments below:
a. The logging road that bisects the tract should be removed in its entirety. This road was
constructed perpendicular to the direction of surface flow across the site and undoubtedly has had
an adverse effect on these flows. This issue is compounded by the fact that culverts across the
road would present a long term maintenance issue if the road were allowed to remain.
b. The mitigation plan needs to provide specific and measurable success criteria relative
to the vegetative and hydraulic components that will be restored. If "enhancement" is a
component of the plan, you should identify what specific wetland function or functions you seek
to enhance.
c. We encourage the use of reference standards to be used in the establishment of
vegetative and hydrologic success criteria.
d. The plan should provide specific information as to the eventual disposition and long
term management of the site.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, they should be addressed to the
undersigned in the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott McLendon
Regulatory Project Manager

-3-
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries, NOAA
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. David Cox
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
R-210
Subject: R-210
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 14:55:33 -0500
From: Mike Wood <mwood @dot. state.nc.us>
Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation
To: John Hennessy <[e-mail]>
John - Below is an excerpt from my permit application as to how DWQ will handle the wetland
mitigation. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.
DWQ - As mandated by Section 401 regulations, a minimum of 1:1 wetland restoration or creation must
be provided for every acre of wetland impact. As stated above, NCDOT proposes to meet the 1:1
requirement for the 4.7 acres of high quality impact at the Little River by providing 4.7 acres of high
quality restoration on-site. NCDOT proposed to mitigate for the remaining 36.8 acres by offering the
entire SALT site.
Based on groundwater models, the SALT site currently has 49 acres of wetlands that will be restored to its
historic hydrology by methods outlined in the mitigation plan. However, DWQ, in accordance with their
request based on a meeting convened on March 20, 2000, has requested that the site be monitored
specifically to gauge the actual effect of the ditches draining the property. Once the effect of the ditches is
determined, a new restoration acreage will be recalculated. If the new acreage does not provide 36.8 acres
of restoration, then the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program has agreed to make up the difference.
In order to determine the current ditch effect on adjacent wetlands, NCDOT will install groundwater
monitoring gauges at varying distance perpendicular to existing ditches. The groundwater will monitored
throughout the 2001 growing season. The resulting data will then be statistically analyzed in a method
agreed upon by NCDOT and DWQ to formulate the drainage effect of the ditches. NCDOT will continue
to develop and monitor the SALT site as detailed in the mitigation plan.
1 of 1 3/2/012:22 PN/.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
A
il
A
il
r
1 1999
pr
NCDENR
Mr. Dave Timpy
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
JAMES B. HUNTJR _ US Army Corps of Engineers "
1v
GOVERNOR Post Office Box 1890 VVV
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890

Ay Dear Mr. Timpy:
WAYNE MCDEVITL;
,?6
...SECRETARY
Subject: NCDOT Project #R-210 C/A/B
Lee County

- The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North
DIRECTOR Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is willing to accept
payment from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
?a
(NCDOT) for stream impacts associated with the subject project in
accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the
NCWRP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Based on information
supplied by the NCDOT in a memorandum dated March 26
1999
the
,
,
impacts associated with the subject project are as follows: 9,000 of
streams. Assuming a 2:1 ratio for compensatory mitigation, the
NCWRP will provide the amount and type of required mitigation in
Cataloging Unit 03030004 of the Cape Fear River.

'. ` If you need additional information I can be reached at 919-733-
5219.

:l Sincerely,

Ronald E. Ferrell
;r Program Manager
Wetlands Restoration Program

x cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
r David Robinson, NCDOT

r
- P.O. BOX 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535

-' PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
1
Cynd;-B 0
From: Ken Averitte WQ [Ken_AveritteWro.ennstate.nc.us)
Sent: Monday, October 05, 1998 8:49 AM
To: [e-mail] ??a I
Subject: US 1 relocation
Cyndi,
I went to the meeting on Sept. 30 with DOT, etc, regarding the US 1 relocation. Judging from
comments made by the COE, I don't think we have to worry much about stream mitigation. They
called just about everything a stream, many of which I would have called a storm water
conveyance. As I understand it, they will require stream mitigation for these. Of course, the
biggest impact was at the Little River near Vass. It involves a LOT of swamp forest that they
intend to fill, with one fairly small bridge section right over the river. (Given the existing bridge,
that should meet the hydraulic requirement.) If you want to talk about this, give me a call
whenever you get a chance. Let me know what I need to do.
Thanks,
KA
d??6
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERI3 SECRETARY
December 2, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Manager
Highway Design Branch
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS FOR R-210, US I
WIDENING AND RELOCATION, LEE/MOORS
COUNTIES.
On September 30, 1998, a pre-application field meeting for the subject project
was convened by Mr. Michael Wood of this department. In attendance were
representatives of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, N. C. Division of Water Quality,
and N. C. Wildlife Resource Commission. The wetland and stream impacts were
reviewed. The following is a list of concerns and comments that were voiced at the
meeting and in a written memorandum (which is attached) followed by a list of the
jurisdictional surface waters that must be reported in the summary sheets.
R-210 A
The crossing of the Little River and its adjacent wetlands impacts the highest quality
wetlands on the project as well as the highest quantity of wetlands (approximately
10 acres). The agency representatives asked that we consider shifting the
alignment north, which will greatly reduce the quality and acreage of wetland
impacts. If this proves impossible, then the current bridge length over the Little
River should be lengthened to avoid the proposed channel change at station 26+50
at a minimum. These impacts created the most concern among agency
representatives.
Any portion of existing US 1 that is abandoned should be graded down, when practicable,
to the level of the adjacent Little River floodplain wetlands.
47+60: The wetland within the gore on either ramp will be considered as impacted and
should be listed on the summary sheet as such.

2
Ramp A 2+00 to 2+20: The plans show the wetlands being cut along the slope stake line.
Can this cut be avoided? Otherwise this will increase wetland impacts due to
cutting (ditching) in wetlands.
R-210 B
132+00 to 132+60: The wetland within the gore on either ramp will be considered as
impacted and should be listed on the summary sheet as such.
139+00 to 141+80: This is a high quality wetland. Can the alignment be shifted west to
reduce the wetland impacts?
150+40: Can this stream be relocated under the bridge as opposed to the culverts?
164+60: The small wetland area outside of the slope stakes line should be considered
impacted and the summary sheet should reflect this.
R-210 C
-Y13- 13+00: Can the ditch shown along the slope stake line be eliminated? Otherwise
this will increase wetland impacts due to cutting (ditching) in wetlands.
-Y14- 21+90 to 31+60: The current design for the channel relocation is unacceptable.
WRC stream relocation guidelines should be implemented and a revegetation-
reforestation plan should be included. If this is impossible, the ditch must be
designed without the rip rap.
39+00: Can the ditch shown along the slope stake line be eliminated? Otherwise this will
increase wetland impacts due to cutting (ditching) in wetlands.
41+20: The wetlands on the plans are incomplete, however is appears a ditch along the
slope stake line is in the wetlands. Can this be eliminated? Otherwise this will
increase wetland impacts due to cutting (ditching) in wetlands.
-Y-13 40+70 to 43+00: This was a recently discovered wetland that is of high quality.
Can the road be redesigned to minimize the impacts to this wetland? All ditches
in the wetlands should be removed
Jurisdictional Streams
The following lists the jurisdictional streams that will be impacted for each section.
While all linear feet of channel being impacted must be reported on the summary sheet,
only those channels where the impacts exceed 150 feet must have drawings prepared.

R-210 A R-210 B R-210 C
29+70 129+10 20+60
30+10 150+40 -Y14- 21+90 to 31+60
51+20 to 52+40 140+80 39+00
61+00
64+70
67+70
79+20
95+00
-Y4-10+80
Miscellaneous Issues
• There are several additional wetlands that were not identified during the planning
phase of the project. These wetlands will need to be accurately depicted and
accounted for in the final impact summary sheet.
• The final impact summary sheet should also include impacts from detours, Y lines,
and ancillary impacts such as ditching.
• All proposed channel relocations throughout the project area should make every effort
to minimize piping and maximize channel relocations. All relocations should be
designed to replicate natural dimensions, pattern and profile, include natural
substrates and riparian vegetation as outlined in the WRC Channel Relocation
Guidelines. Complete relocation plans need to be provided with the permit
application if DOT expects to obtain any onsite credit for stream restoration.
In order to help expedite the permitting process, a statement will be needed which
explains why any of these avoidance/minimization measures cannot be taken. Michael
Wood of the Natural Systems Unit is the contact person for this project. If you need
additional information, please contact him at [phone] (Extension 306). I
appreciate your attention to this matter.
cc: Dave Timpy, USACE Wilmington
Scott McLendon, USACE Wilmington
Cyndi Bell, DWQ
Ken Averitte, DWQ
David Cox, WRC
James Speer, Roadway Design
Dave Scheffel, Design Services
Marshall Clawson, Hydraulics
Jim Davis, Hydraulics
Randy Wise, Road Side Environmental
Jay Bissett, Planning & Environmental
Charles Bruton, Planning & Environmental
Phil Harris, Planning & Environmental
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON IJISTAICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO November 23, 1998
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199300570, TIP R-210,
and Moore Counties, North Carolina.
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch ?..M.
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
to Lakeview, Lee
Please reference the field meeting of September 30, 1998, between the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT); Mr. Ken Averitte, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ); Mr. David Cox, (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission);
Mr. Scott McLendon, Corps of Engineers and myself. The purpose of the meeting was to inspect
the proposed areas of wetland impacts and identify streams with proposed impacts that will
require stream or riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project.
It is our understanding that Alternative A as described in the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) dated December 1, 1995, is NCDOT's selected alternative and that final design
for the project is complete. Based on the FEIS, the total jurisdictional wetlands impacted by
Alternative A are 56.1 acres. This includes 38.9 acres of bottomland hardwoods and 17.2 acres
of impounded wetlands. Mr. Michael Wood advised that approximately 8.9 acres of additional
jurisdictional wetlands that were not included in the FEIS have been recently identified. This
raises the total wetlands impacted by Alternative A to 65.0 acres.
Wetland sites inspected during the meeting and streams identified as requiring mitigation
are summarized below (note that stations refer to centerline stations as marked in the field versus
those shown on the design plans):
Site 1. This site is adjacent to the Little River. The proposed channel relocation of Little
River was discussed along with possible changes in the final design that could be made to reduce
wetland impacts in this area. We strongly recommend relocating the connector from R-210 to
US 1 further east in order to avoid the crossing at Little River. A small stream at approximately
at STA 18+80 will require stream or riparian wetland mitigation.
Site 1D. The wetlands to be impacted were verified. There are no streams at this site.
Site 3. This site was located at the end of Highland Avenue where a bridge is proposed at
this crossing of the Little River. Expansion of this bridge will be evaluated as a minimization
measure during final design. A small stream located at STA 49+60 will require stream or
riparian wetland mitigation.
Site 4. This site was located at STA 55+00. This site was not identified in the FEIS. A
small stream crossing will require stream or riparian wetland mitigation.
Site 5. This site was located at STA 81+20 at the crossing of Crane Creek. NCDOT
proposes to bridge this site. A small stream at STA 79+76 will require stream or riparian
wetland mitigation. Mr. Averitte, (NCDWQ) recommended that the proposed sediment trap at
STA 88+00 be relocated out of wetlands.
Site 15. This site was located at STA 141+00 and contains high quality hardwood
swamp. Re-alignment of R-210 to avoid this swamp was discussed. However, due to nearby
historic properties the alignment should remain unchanged in this area.
Site 16. This site was located at STA 150+00 along the Moore County line and railroad
track. The existing stream at this station will require stream or riparian wetland mitigation. This
crossing is proposed to be culverted.
Site 22. An intermittent stream exists at this site. It was determined that stream or
riparian wetland mitigation will be required.
Site 26. This last site was located at the intersection of Eakes Road (SR 1181) and US 1.
The wetlands at this site were not identified in the FEIS but would be included in the total
wetlands impacted by the project and should be addressed by your mitigation plan.
In summary, based on our observations during referenced meeting, we strongly
recommend that NCDOT consider final design changes to R-210 in the vicinity of the Little
River that will avoid or minimize wetland impacts. As stated in the FEIS, the State of North
Carolina designates the Little River as High Quality Water (HQW). Most, if not all, of the
wetland adjacent to this river can be avoided by relocating the western connection of R-210 to
US 1 to the east.
2
M ` +
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the Wilmington Field
Office, Regulatory Division, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dave Timpy
Regulatory Project Manager
Wilmington Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Larry Hardy Ms. Kathy Matthews
National Marine Fisheries Service Wetlands Section - Region IV
Pivers Island Water Management Division
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 US Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, NW
Mr. John Heftier, Field Supervisor Atlanta, Georgia 30303
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. David Cox
Highway Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
11411-85 Service Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27522
3
AD - %
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Parks & Recreation
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Dr. Philip K. McKnelly, Director
AlFWAVA,
4i
1?
WOO&
E3 FE F=1
l? ,v
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
July 1, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: John Dorney
Water Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management
From: Inge Smith Terrill
Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation
Subject: Significant Natural Areas Along the Little River in the Vicinity of
Cameron and Vass
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program does not have records of high quality natural
communities or significant natural areas occurring within a 0.5-mile radius of the Cameron/Vass
Highway 1 project area. We do, however, have records of two rare species occurring near the
southern end of this project area. To our knowledge, this area has not been systematically
inventoried and we cannot definitively state that other rare species or significant natural areas
do not occur there.
The two rare species mentioned above occur about 0.5 mile east of US 1, along the Little River,
just west of SR 1864 and south of the Little River on the Niagara quad. These species are the
pine barrens treefrog (Hyla andersonii), significantly rare in the state, and the four-toed
salamander (Hemidac , lium scutatum), of Special Concern in the state.
Please contact me at 733-7701 if you have any questions or need further information.
RECEIVED RECENIM
JUL 0 5 19Q6 "" r G 40QA
EWIRONMENTAL$ IINCE6 ENV!;ar)N;,r,. c
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
M,
.Ift ? ?q
64, 'Ro*, ?? I9y6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA °>T94S?iFN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
March 14, 1996
Mr. Eric Galamb
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29635
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0635
Dear Mr. Galamb:
SUBJECT: Improvements to US 1 in Moor and Lee Counties, State Project No.
8.T560302, TIP Project No. R-210
Thank you for your memo commenting on the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the subject project. Several design issues were raised which we would like
to clarify; the location of service roads, the proposed side slopes, the use of lateral ditches,
and the length of bridges and other structures.
Service roads are necessary near the project's northern terminus to provide access
to the property that would otherwise be land-locked as a result of project construction.
As you know, the proposed new facility will be an freeway with full control of access.
Three service roads will be required. We do not anticipate induced development as a
result of the placement of service roads, as local planning officials indicate that
development is not anticipated for the northern portion of the project. Further, no public
water and wastewater utilities are available in that area. Their lack of availability makes
the northern portion of the project less desirable for most intensive land uses.
proposed in the vicinity of the Little River, at the southern end of the project.
The existing US 1 roadway will be utilized for one of the service roads, while the
remaining two will involve new construction. Two service roads will be located on each
side of the proposed facility for a distance of approximately 2.5-miles, between SR 1181
(Lakes Road) and SR 1182 (Cedar Lane Road). Existing US 1 will serve as the eastern
service road in this area. The third service road is approximately 0.65-miles in length,
serving property on the south side of SR 1182. We estimate that the service road
construction will impact approximately 2.25 acres of wetlands. No service roads are
N4WO.-rit
?* • • <
The alignment of the service roads will be reevaluated during the project's final
design phase in an attempt to minimizd wetland impacts. Further, we will evaluate the use
of discontinuous service roads between SR 1181 and SR 1182 to reduce the opportunity
for secondary impacts to wetlands.
North Carolina Department of Transportation Best Management Practices
(BMP's) calls for utilization of 2:1 side slopes in wetland areas to minimize the placement
of fill material. This ratio will be applied in all impacted wetland sites during the final
design of the project. We regret any confusion resulting from the discussion on slope
ratios in wetland areas during the September 21, 1995 interagency meeting.
The BMP's also recommend against the use of lateral ditches in wetlands, due to
the possibility of drainage. Therefore, the use of lateral ditches in wetland areas will be
avoided during the final design.
As noted in your memo, the bridge openings illustrated in the preliminary plans are
designed to accommodate the hydraulic conveyance. We are aware that lengthening
bridges to avoid wetlands is a mitigative action which is likely to be requested during the
permitting phase of the project. We will evaluate the feasibility of lengthening structures
at that time.
We have included a response to your memo in the project's Record of Decision. If
you have further questions, please contact Byron Brady, P. E., at 733-3141.
Since
H. ranklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp
cc: Federal Highway Administration

?v x
CUNNINGHAM, DEDMOND, PETERSEN & SMITH, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW co
225 NORTH BENNETT STREET PY
SOUTHERN PINES, NORTH CAROLINA 28387
BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM, JR. MAILING ADDRESS
RICHARD E. DEDMOND P. O. BOX 1468
ANN C. PETERSEN [phone] SOUTHERN PINES, NC 28388
MARSH SMITH FAX NO. [phone]
June 12, 1996
J R?cF?LF
B
q 6
uhe ?eanS taeesr„epaFtmeena?l Sep anspoy ?a tion ?,?`sc/F?°Fs
400 7th Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20590
The Hon. Garland Garrett, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Need For Programmatic EIS for US 1 Corridor in North Carolina
Dear Secretary Pena and Secretary Garrett:
Previously, I have corresponded with you on behalf of my client,
Moore For a Clean Environment (MooreFORCE). Since then, Secretary
Garrett has refused to either revise the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) or recommend recision of the Record of Decision
(ROD). As yet, the United States Department of Transportation
(USDOT), through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has not
responded to my client's request, although in a letter dated May
22, 1996, Rodney Slater of the FHWA indicated that James C.
Thomason, III and Donald J. Voelker would respond in detail to my
client's request. I hope that USDOT and FHWA will not consider
themselves bound by the response of the NCDOT.
It appears to me that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requires FHWA to either prepare a programmatic EIS for the entire
US 1 Corridor or admit that the FEIS for the proposed by-pass of
Vass and Cameron unwarrantedly segments the FEIS. I would,
therefore, make an additional request that NCDOT and FHWA prepare
a programmatic EIS for the "improvements" planned, and now
partially implemented, along the entire US 1 Corridor. Such a
programmatic EIS could address alternatives that the FEIS for the
proposed by-pass unwarrantedly eliminated from further
consideration. It could also address the cumulative wetland
impacts that concerned the USEPA, but which NCDOT and FHWA refused
to address.
• .V
The Hon. Federico F. Pena
The Hon. Garland Garrett
June 12, 1996
Page 2
Finally, I wish to make Secretary Pena aware that NCDOT promised to
address certain issues in the FEIS, but did not address them. I
have supplied copies of prior correspondence between myself and
NCDOT that document NCDOT's assurances that the suggestions would
be considered during the preparation of the FEIS.
Sincerely,
CUNNINGH 7 , DEDM D, '444 d v
Marsh Smith
MS/ka
PETERSEN & SMITH, L.L.P.
Enclosures (9/6/94 letter to Frank Vick, 5/5/92 letter from
L.J. Ward, 4/27/92 letter to Thomas Harrelson,
3/23/92 letter from Thomas Harrelson, and 3/11/92
letter to Thomas Harrelson)
cc: Don Voelker, FHWA (w/ enc.)
H. Franklin Vick, NCDOT (w/ enc.)
Ted Bisterfeld, USEPA, Region 4
ney, NCDEM
Robert L. Morris
The Hon. Isabelle Thomas, Mayor of Cameron
Rodney E. Slater, FHWA, USDOT
James C. Thomason, III, Esq. (w/ enc.)
Dyy??vid Cox, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1fohn Dor
? go?
H
U
d
Fd
Z
d
a
F
W
N

' ' -
l.' L? w H E- E
- H ?' H F
w x x t x y

a H H E" E" E" U U U U F U U

p4 C4 04 P4 U U U U U U U U w U U
0 G

w 44
ca
ca
ca
e
.
bA
O
0
a,
a a : a u U U v a° .-a a° CA P° ° . a a

c W
? O
w G4 Q1 ' pq
w p
w W .?
w ?
w C
w
Aa W W w
w W
t:
a? v v ? ? ?. ? v, ? ? .,
Q h O p O O O O O O O O O O O
3 au a a a A a w a
, a a V) . a , A4 a a4 w a, . a, a

a a
v
Q

L
= d
cq
\.o

F 00

0

O

t
N
C\
'"
"
•d kn N O O o
o 00
Cf
?0 M ?o N N -- N
d
ccz
a

a?
en CO\ O o

v
d
b
rn O a\ (? O O
y tn N in oo r- ?t Wn r- 'd: 09 to
y y "O M \O N N -- oo N

a
E

?? o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
? w, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CIO o + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C Z O kn O N Ln kn \O O kn N M W? M O O to to O
:. rp ? 00 \O O N kn 00 rn It \O C C\ O M \D [ -

?y A N N N N N M M M M ct ? 1n
=z

N
N
N
M
M
er
tn
l 00
00
A tn

rA
? O
?
G
'1 7.
N M ct In ?O

tl-

00

ON

O

?.
N

M

? v

? ?
c c
a

c E" F, ? ae

U U E.
a? a

U U V ti
a?

a . a 0. ° ° ° a
U
0, °
a
. a
? ?G W

a H o o O o O O O a a O
? a a a a a 1'•1 a
a a
v
d
v
r.a
d N O N "" M W \I O O
? R
N ^+ ?t 06
•
r+ M
d "
CS

C14 O
C N C

° N r.
w
c
E

v
d
v
Q ?

5 C d
N t4r)
M C)
N en
O
O
M
4
y 'b N O N -- -
4)
d "

CL

O
iia
.+
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

_
C5 + + + + + + + + +
Z tf) M ? N O
N M
A
c
=z
o
• O O O N N N

? O

r- rn O
N
N N
N It
N kn
N \O
N
3 ?
rn
m
v
c?
z
t0
O?
\
l0
z
z
2
n
-a
N
9
m
r
D
z
v
W
0
c
z
v
D r
m
0
m
z
v
C
,\\N
-e L t
\ l IN I i ?
N I N? I I ???°
N? I I
I I I : ? ?*
I ? II I g
I I 1 ,/ .#
I ? ?? i ? N l
i / I LD ? (T?
C? I Ul 1
MATCH LINE SEE FIGURE 2 STA'.I co-+ "411??
I ]?,
I ]?. I
? I
I? I, I
4
w
,
N
?a

1
t
.?yy
1
1 ?
,

twn
ern

!
I
!
I
i
t
,
(; I
1? l
i; 1 ?
m
N
v
z
N ? ? ro I I 1` R "?
m I
Ul Z I `I? r
I
?•__: V) I t?N
N , I 4
m I
I I I 1
? 1 L I
1 ? I
I
r
D ?N ; I I i 1 ~,,
O I ? ? 1 a
c I ' fTl I .? ?,?
/A'
? I i. I i
la.
® 1 J .. i r'`q`r
Li-
I ?
a
?D I ? P ? O N
0 0
1 ` p
J O G , `
L) Q N N 1 \Y0
1
w
,1 I
I ? '( o
N Z
m
N
O N
-n
,V #
90 ?
G'7
N C
fn
N
v
Z
tD
tC
m
r
D
z
v
T
W
O
r
z
O
D r-
m
C)
m
z
Q
m
r
D
z
m
N
N
w
90
`
i
?y ?? '?,?" ? ...?:' it ,'.a ? ` ? '.?? ? • •,. - _ _ ? : ? y
? ? , \ U„ ? .,,,, •M1' ? ,.y? _+ / ? .? ? ?} ?/ i ?? dam: .? I R
I -A
f t
-Ali
y
t
1-8
1 _
is - ? .n• .1-'" ?? i' -
-'-.. ....... .......
b ??--YY 1.1
d
17,
t
1 ,
t •`t h -- T- a ? ? 3N?? H?ltlll?
_ ? _,nn+59Z'tl 15 ?4
m
c
m
m
w
M,q
s
2 rCy l/NE
S
H a ? fF F/r,URE
X654600
1 ? c
r ,
r
D / Ni4 +
z
w
c
z -
-? ?
z i
cl IM
?? ?-,
1
N J
t.
?, :? t, J 1 r
r
N CTl
14
m
8 ,
i 1
90 T A. 320 00
SEE FIGURE 5• S +
# I MATCH LINE c
cn m
m
Ln
'v
G7
Z
LO
61
11
t0
Ln
-b 3tino u 33S 3NI-l Ho1bW 1
pp+OZ£ 't1 1S (3n 1 I
?a 1 1 Y •'•• 11
/ cn 1
N %? 1 1 j
;2
A 1
1 ?` 1 1
? 1 1 ?• 4
cn ? , 1
1 1
? 1? 1; 1 1
rri
1 '
v •?
1
C13 I 1 1
c ` 1 I ?
o I k i I
> ? ' X 1 I
-< ? as rr t 1
1
z -, ' 1
1 1
' I
+ ? 1 1
1
J j 1
w 1
a { 1
\l ' I
?, • ! 1 ?tfw { 1
u ? ' I
? 1 I
1 1 1?
m
r
D
Z
#0
?U)
go -I
m
# N
00
#
to
#
m
9 / \ t t
\ N
O
y _ 1
S-Dcu
h ? ?, N wI I
/ 1 1
?^' w l
ll ? /r
Y • F 1
4X
?> ' MA CH LINE SEE FIGURE 6. STA. 38(
? i
rte. to

m
m
c)
z
W
N,
T
N,
to
Ul
91 PK
m
r
n
z
v
W
0
c
z
v
v r
m
0
m
z
v
m
r
D
z
0
N
m
N
00
c0
R°
O
1 / 1
14
,'=1 1 1
?. I
/ 1 I
iLA
,?aa w I I I
w .. I
#(A r
t
I
/ I r
I f
r
I I ? N
1 I ' ?
I { ?
I
i I
• f r
w t
?, I , 1 ? m It 1
\l I r
• ? M
I ?
1 4 ? ate` •?„t om
z I r 1 a
o
.I rrl. I I ?
1 u I
6 I '•
MA TRH LINE Sf~ r r...:.__ "'' ? - I
' .?' A¦ 435+
7 _
m
0
c
m
M
L-i
u\\
m
m 4
z
c?
z
s
MA TOH LINO SEE FIGURE 6. STA. 485+00
I IT .?
Ln
> ? It
P3 ( .
O
to I i' I \ a
Ir + a
I ?
1
`? I I I • r r !
• ? !J r ?
J: I
?I m
Zr w
I ? "' I
in j \ I I' I ' W
I JI
r i
M
r J
n Zr'
N
r
co + r
v ?? r I wf
zv ' ? _ _ ` r
n A /` d
f Z ? ?m
I \ a
/mr1 ? W
9? fLD
I
2 -_j
? ~
I I r `mp
V+
a
x J
I " .
Ji ? f ? ` ? k J
? I
1
r `%// ? I ?^Z ya
5" IQ j }^
I I \\ f ?
-P i rr? `..•.?
l
a o I ?i,
A n J r w m ? Li?~?
`?-? r ? r I ? ? ? MKK
{j
I mrP :oz
131,
r `. I, x J ?-? ??
(DO
Sp N ????'`?ti i I •g ???
•41S
S?b
cm }
.?
M
N ?
m

rl MA TCH LINE
./ SEE FIGURE
7. STA. 485+00
All
0
1
, ! 1 x
41,
r ?? .a 1 I/ ? / ?, ? p m
' 1 I_ QQ// _ alt
C 1 371
o = 1
."0 f l / 1 ?» I Cz)) Y ah '? ./
I , \
,C \l 1 I v? ? V Je'Y {? \ Z N a
a
a
u / a
ne n g ?
1A
1
••?? , ? 2 UvWi ? ?
•$ 31 `?? NfA ? ?-v
?t
90
Q? 1

M
0
C
co
n0+Sb5 'd iS 66 38nou 33S 3N11 H31"
m
v
z
LD
Ch

00+SdS'v1S'S Unou 33S 3N11 H:)idY'
s a 1
H
?
1
CS

?
1
4
\ y? $
+ a ,
;1
o /
H 1

1

\ /
ii //
1
\
W

1
1
1

m
a
z + F
; S •W I
4

c 1
\
1
D
C) + o?
1
Q 1? r

r /

?/ • W
1+ oN ? `c
z {n
• ? ti
?i
1 \t W
T t w?i
1 7
• \\ W
• r +r
r
t
r ! z ;? \
? M
Y 1\ _ ? /
Z
71
1 ?? Q rv? '-? w,
07
V J ? ON 2 / r? 2M
/ / tdh / ?0 C'?' fJ.
7 az y ?o • i^^ . \•? ??
? SfE F l . ?.
A. 60S f ? o a V
ti

c
m
co
91S ` cn
I,
\ rn
y I co
00+5090d1S'6 38nou 33S 3NIl H:)tvW
1 \ ? FFi --• ? ? Cz m r
4 1
1 N" ?- mss
It
II 1 \I ? m ?
lO y
II 1 i I `'`
m \
at> x ?
II ( 11 1 > I i : A v.
Toy.
{ \ \`
2"o
)I N
? \ H I x ?
--x
1 v
p fTl H t fx w II
ZIP
0 it
Uy
C n
Z ' \ x It
?°z a
I I O II r
v , I I N
r _ \ w it mo
-•G t •
U O'bi` o" ° p
fn I Q II I- /
Z
S.rr 1 ? '^ I x
. r _
O I ? ????` ' 1 s ? ` I Ix
1 I \? Il n 1 / \ ? `?.I
{
\ k/QA
N \ \ , \ az IN
\ ? t ? It< =t^
? X5.3 \\ , ? .. \ >`n
/ • \ \\ \ \n x0 \
v ?
y°
go M
(n ?- - a \ I N / S l
D --- ?_ ?` $ •'415 A ? m
00099 0
i Q
i
s
00#099'diS "OI 3aMlj 33S 3NI1 H:)1dW
I, 1 , 1 •
-I---
I '
I
100
I _ I
• y I
cm
? rN ? 1
e l '_' i 1 I
(
I s
I `
l I _, I
--F, -'.? -
r I
v ?-- I
•'N N m r I
0 r z.'+? •' L I
C Ni I _ _ I
N P
0 x n : I^
>
-? ? ? .. _ I a I I
m 9 = _ I
I
ta
I ? 1 r- ' I t
I 1 ' t
I { N
• 1 1
r
m
I I fi
.• t I w
I ? ' 1 ? 1 d? ?j.. rr ; m
/ ? 1 vv ro
?? I ? r ? I I 11 •• ,
z
?G rr
j
1 n>
I ? ? I
O 1
r
N t- ,? ! I I mz t
90
N OO+SIL'd1S'ZI UnOi. 33S 3NI-I H0iVn m
LA m
0-0-
A: o ?
P
o
r
f
N
oo+SIZ vIS'I[ 3b 01
t
N a ? `
\ ro I ?
X
i
H:)1vW
I uQ 4 • •
I .
I ?
# 1 1
1 m
N
` I
b
Z t?
• 1
C q, ? I ??I s
? m A 1f^
XI m
m ? It i,k m I 1
\ /.. 0
t?V• • ? ' ?? I C? I
11 .? Camy'? ? ?q .•
W \ 11 of ? \?
i
r\•-
12
/ r
L
II ?•
M
Q '
VIM
•,\ ??. L,
F?
V ?/' A:? .?T Cl
t
t .-•-t? 'ice I .. i\I NY
I ?
1 ?1
Uao=
N y A }
-t A mT
0 LA
90 tL o? F ?, c•,
N?. n
CY)
a
-11
a5
C
m
N
- -1
n ?
n ?
0
0
m
a
i?
BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM, JR.
RICHARD E. DEDMOND
ANN C. PETERSEN
MARSH SMITH
CUNNINGHAM, DEDMOND, PETERSEN & SMITH
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
225 NORTH BENNETT STREET
SOUTHERN PINES, NORTH CAROLINA 28387
[phone]
January 23, 1995
Mr. G. Wayne Wright
US Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Vir . John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
512 N. Salisbury St., Archdale Bldg.
Raleigh, NC 27611
i
JAN ? 61995
N4 414 -r. C[Tf i
?'SrrliCLti1ITr ?l,viv Ll
MAILING ADDRESS LL
P. O. BOX 1468
SOUTHERN PINES, NC 28388
FAX NO. [phone]
Re: NCDOT Highway Rerouting of US Highway #1 between Lakeview, NC
and Lee County (TIP # 210)
Dear Mr. Wright & Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed please find a DOT information sheet that shows estimated
wetland impacts for the above-referenced project. Please note that
DOT claims to have chosen alternative A.
I represent CARE Moore, a Moore County environmental group opposed
to irresponsible road building in Moore County. CARE Moore
believes that any alternative other than one which improves the
exiting road bed, will impact Moore County's natural resources in
an unacceptably severe manner. We call your attention to the huge
area of wetlands affected by alternative A, and solicit you to
notify us if and when the NCDOT applies for a section 404 permit.
CARE Moore believes that you will agree that any permit application
will warrant a public hearing before granting any permit.
Additionally, we do not believe a permit should be issued since
alternatives exist to impacting such a large area of wetlands, not
the least of which involves the "no build" and "spot improvements"
alternatives.
Sincerely,
CUNNINGHAM, D DM D, PETE EN SMITH
Marsh Smith
MS/ka
Enclosures: Summary of Impacts, Announcement of Alternative A
cc: Gwen Funderburk, Frank Vick, Richard Morgan, Tina Little &
Fred Hobbs (with enclosures)
r
Length (in miles)
Number of Interchanges'
and Intersections'
Number of Relocatees
Total Cost
Construction
Right-of-Way
Benefit/Cost Ratio
Discount Rate
Hydrologic Crossings
Channel Relocation
Potential Hazardous
Waste Sites
Noise (impacted units)
Natural Systems (acres)
(supports wildlife)
Wetlands (impacted acres)
Impacted Species, Federal
Classification
Listed*
Under Review*
Impacted Species, State
Classification
Listed*
Under Review*
Prime and Important Farmland
(impacted acres)
Historic Properties (eligible for
inclusion on National Register)
Archaeological Sites (requiring
additional work to determine
National Register eligibility)
Schools
Water Intake
Waste Treatment Facility Impacts
Alter-
native D
12.5
2
3
105
$52.0 M
$37.2 M
$14.8 M
Alter-
native E
12.7
2
4
42
$54.3 M
$47.3 M
$7.0 M
2.11 2.94 2.31 2.43 2.18
19 15 14 15 15
1 0 0 0 1
1 1 3 5 1
16 16 17 20 14
385 402 369 366 427
95 80 90 75 124
3 3 3 3 3
7 5 5 5 5
8 6 6 6 6
14 14 14 14 14
158 226 224 207 171
0 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 1
1 0 0 1 0
(1) Number of interchanges and intersections based on that required in Design Year 2010.
(2) Includes Administrative and Contingency.
*Note: Habitat for the species was located in the respective alternative's corridor, but no individuals of the'species were actually
observed during the field survey of the study area.
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
U.S. 1 - LEE AND MOORE COUNTIES
Alter- Alter- Alter-
native A native B native C
12.2 11.7 12.5
3 3 2
2 3 4
45 30 90
$46.2 M $45.1 M $52.8 M
$39.1 M $39.8 M $39.6 M
$7.1M $5.3M $13.2M
? ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
EW(SLETTED
N C D 0T M?OidOlsenHensley
DIVISION OF H10NWAYS
P.O. Box 23201
P.Q Box 31388, Raleigh, NC 276224388
RALEIGH, KC. 27611 2301 Rexwoods Drive. Suite 200
Englneers/Arehltecir.: ta:inors
[phone] Fox: [phone]
ISSUE NO. 4 NCDOT PROJECT NO. R-210 APRIL 1992
DECISION ON ALTERNATIVE
On April 22, 1992, a news release was issued by the Public Affairs Division of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation. It read as follows:
Transportation Officials Choose Alternative A for U.S. 1
Raleigh - State transportation officials said Wednesday a new 12-mile section of U.S. I will be built along
Alternative A to reduce the impact on the community and environment while saving taxpayers up to $8 million
in construction costs
The proposed route runs about 12 miles between Crystal Lake in Moore County and near to the existing
intersection of U.S. I and SA 1180 in Lee County.
'Alternative A provides the best balance, " said Thomas Peacock, preconstruction chief engineer with
the N. C. Department of Transportation. '7t will bring about the improvements we need for U.S. 1 while
reducing the impact to the environment. "
State transportation officials had considered up to five different routes for the proposed new leg of
U.S. 1, which will include four lanes and a median. Construction estimates for the new section total $462
million. Three of the other routes would have cost from $6 million to $8 million more.
Although one proposed route - Alternative B - would cost about the same, transportation offilcials
determined that the route called for some interchange plans that were viewed as undesirable.
Four miles of the proposed route follow the existing U.S. I alignment. The remaining eight miles will
be built along a new location.
State transportation officials expect to hold a design public hearing in early 1993. Right-of-way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in 1996 Construction could start in 1998.
???? WHAT'S NEXT ????
The above news release is the final activity in the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) phase of the
project. Next, a Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) will be prepared. The FEIS will discuss the selected
Alternative (Alternative A), will further detail the project
impacts, and will address any mitigation efforts that will be
required. The FEIS will discuss and explain why each of the
other detailed study alternatives were not selected. In
addition, the FEIS will contain responses to comments and
questions from the DEIS reviewers and the corridor public
hearing. Field surveys and preliminary design will begin
which will lead to the Design Public Hearing scheduled for
1993.
LAST NEWSLETTER
This newsletter will be the last one to be coming to you
regarding the project. Announcements will be made in local
newspapers prior to the Design Public Hearing. We've
enjoyed working with the citizens of Moore County and Lee
County on this phase of the Project.
l

HOTLINE
A local telephone number, has been
installed in the consultant's office for those who
have questions, general or specific,. about the
progress of 'the improvements to US 1.. The
"Hotline" is available for project calls from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
CALL: [phone]
Written inquiries, comments, or
suggestions should be addressed to:
Mr. L Jack Ward, P.E.
Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
NCDo,r
11. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
or
Mr. Steven Thomas, P.E.
Piedmont Olsen Hensley
P. O. Box 31388
Raleigh, NC 27622
I I WVr1V ML. I L UILIYP1 I I V G h a7GLLV i GLJ C
As stated by NCDOT's Chief Engineer for Preconstruction, Thomas Peacock, 'Alternative A provides
the best balance. It will bring about the improvement - wa need for U.S. 1 while reducing the impact to the
environment. " Details of the significant items whir. 4luenced the decision to build improvements for
U.S. 1 along the Alternative A corridor are as fu Is:
Total Project Cost
Alternatives A and B are the lowest cost alternate,
of the construction cost of A). All other alterna.
cost for right-of-way acquisition and construction:
30 for Alternative B to 105 for Alternative D.
relocatees.
-with only $800,000 separating them (less than 2%
range from $5.8 million to $8.4 million more in
he anticipated number of relocatees ranges from
ternative A is on the low end with 45 potential
Public Involvement
One petition was received bearing 388 signatures v.,.rch opposed Alternative B and recommended use
of the existing corridor as much as possible.. A second petition was received bearing 508 signatures in
opposition to Alternatives B, C, and D. In addition, a petition was received bearing signatures of 466
property owners in Woodlake stating their preference for Alternative A. A majority of the Public had
a preference for an eastern corridor.
Natural Resources
Overall impacts to acres of wildlife habitat for Alternative A are only 5% (19 acres) higher than for
the lowest impact corridor, Alternative D. Wetlands impacts are midrange for Alternative A at 95
acres.
Alternative A has the least impact (113 acres) to potential habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker,
a federally protected species. The other alternatives range in impacted areas from 175 acres
(Alternative E) to 303 acres (Alternative B).
Alternative A has the least impact to prime and important farmland at 158 acres. The next lowest
alternative is E at 171 acres; Alternative B impacts the most prime and important farmland of any
alternative (226 acres).
Governmental/Agencies
The Town of Vass expressed concern of possible impacts to the town's water supply due to Alter-
native B crossing Little River slightly upstrer ' iter intake. Vass also expressed concern of
loss of property from the tax digest with Alt id D. Lee County expressed opposition to
Alternative B due to impact on residential s,.r, ...ing that corridor. Federal and state natural
resource agencies expressed preference for use of the existing corridor as much as practically possible.
Design Considerations
Although Alternative B is the shortest route at 11.7 miles, Alternative A is the second shortest at 12.2
miles. All other alternatives are 12.5 miles or longer. Alternative B requires an extremely long and
costly bridge crossing of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad near Crystal Lake;at the southern end of the
project. The Alternative B interchange would complicate traffic movements with existing U.S. 1. The
southern tie-in with Alternative A is less complex and can be constructed in separate stages. 'The
crossing of the railroad will be accomplished by a shorter, less costly bridge to be located near the
Moore County/Lee County line with Alternative A.
Other
The number of noise impacts, potential hazardous waste sites, and potential archaeological' sites were
very minimal and approximately the same for each one of the alternatives. • There were no impacts on
historic properties eligible for inclusion on the National Register for any of the alternatives.
Piedmont Olsen Hensley
P. O. Box 31388 ?. _--.- -- =
Raleigh, NC 27622
MAY 5`2
E: a (? iy
Ms. Paige Burns
Marsh Smith
P.O. Box 1075
Southern Pines, NC 28388
?t
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, 'Av
Health and Natural Resources AW4?.
Division of Environmental Management -N
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C)E H N P
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 24, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorne4z )'
From: Eric Galamb(f04
Subject: FEIS for US 1
Lee and Moore Counties
State Project DOT No. 8.T560302, TIP # R-210
EHNR # 96-0436, DEM # 11148
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for .the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact of waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that 56.1 acres of wetlands and waters will be
impacted by this project. DEM offers the following comments on the FEIS:
A) DEM is concerned that DOT is proposing to construct service roads on both
sides of the existing road. Wetland site 22 is a 96.2 acre (within ROW)
community that is of moderate to high quality (Table III-19). As proposed,
10.64 acres will be impacted (Table IV-14). If service roads were not
constructed (i.e. construct an expressway), the wetland impacts would be
reduced. The rationale for service roads should be discussed.
B) As a follow-up to A above, the site numbering for Tables III-19 and IV-14
should be the same so that comparisons of wetland quality can be made.
C) We are concerned that bridge openings were designed only to accommodate
the minimum requirement for hydraulics and no consideration was made for
wetland avoidance. DOT should be aware that bridging of wetlands is an
alternative that avoids fill and lengthening bridges will probably be requested
during the permit application.
D) The project was discussed in an interagency meeting on September 21, 1995.
During that meeting, DOT informed the agencies that side slopes in wetlands
were at 3:1. The document states that the side slopes are 2:1 in wetlands.
What is the correct answer to the side slope issue? In addition, the draining of
wetlands by lateral drainage ditches had not been factored into the wetland
impacts. A definitive answer on the lateral ditches will be required prior to the
404/401 permit application. DEM expressed concern about these items during
that meeting and therefore the statement that the agencies agreed that all
practicable efforts had been made to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands is
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
--k. V
Melba McGee Memo
January 24, 1996
Page 2
not correct.
E) Since DOT is proposing service roads, a discussion of secondary development
and its related impacts to wetlands is necessary to concur with this type of
facility.
Due to the major issues raised, DEM does not concur with the FEIS. DOT is
reminded that endorsement of a FEIS by DEM would not preclude the denial of a 401
Certification upon application if wetland and water impacts have not been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
us1 moore.fei
cc: Raleigh COE
Wilmington COE
Monica Swihart

rmoaf#
JAN 24 tft
Department of Environment, Health, and Na* R" ources
? Project located in 7th floor library
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs j
Project Review Form
i e):
Project Number: County: Date: Date Response Due (firm deadlf
i I .
t? f
`1 Gfi - tom-- . •. ?? E ' z r`
This project is being reviewed as indicated below: ?IGL Y 1 1l s"?p ?(
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville ? Air ? Coastal Management ? Water Planning
? Water ? Water Resources ? Environmental Health
? Mooresville
Groundwater
? ,+
Wildlife ?Solid Waste Management
? Raleigh ? Land Quality Engineer ? Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant ? Land Resources ? David Foster
? Coastal Management Consultant V-Parks and Recreation ? Other (specify)
? Wilmington
? Others
Pnvironmental Management
? Winston-Salem PWS Monica Swihart
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager.
? No objection to project as proposed
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
? Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached)
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attach ed/authority(ies) cited)
In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? Applicant has been contacted
?Applicant has not been contacted
? Project Controversial (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement not needed
? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
? Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
\ Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
STATE o
?-rt
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
.Fs B. HUNT JR.
GowpNOR
June 27, 1996
P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
GARLAND B. GARRETT
SECRETARY ,-

Mr. Marsh Smith
Cunningham, Dedmond, Petersen and Smith, L.L.P.
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
Post Office Box 1468
Southern Pines, North Carolina 28388
Dear Mr. Smith:
Thank you for your recent letter regarding improvements to US 1 in Moore and
Lee Counties (TIP Project No. R-210).
The Department of Transportation followed all required procedures in the
formulation of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), and the Record of Decision (ROD) for the
R-210 project. We have coordinated every stage of this project with the Federal Highway
Administration using their guidelines for the preparation of environmental documents.
As I have stated in earlier correspondence, the Department is mandated by the
Highway Trust Fund Act of 1989 to four-lane existing US 1 from the Virginia state line to
the South Carolina state line. This entire section of US 1 currently has multi-lanes or is
under construction except for two projects, the R-210 project and the R-2501 project in
Richmond County. As far as the logical termini for this project is concerned, an EIS for
the entire US 1 corridor is not required.
We stand by our decision to proceed with this project and believe that it will
improve the transportation needs of Moore and Lee Counties in the future.
PHONE [phone].)-20 FAX [phone]
4
?N??RoNvs 1996
G)
Mr. Marsh Smith
June 27, 1996
Page 2
Thank you again for your interest in this important highway project.
Sincerely,
Garland B. Garrett, Jr.
GBG/hfv
cc: Mary Hayes Holmes, Member, Board of Transportation
Isabelle Thomas, Mayor of Cameron
Ted Bisterfeld, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Don Voelker, Federal Highway Administration
Rodney E. Slater, Federal Highway Administration
David Cox., N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
hn Dorney, N. C. Department of Environmental Management
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
2,10
-Y10
- ----- -------- ----
------ _-----------
PIP[
?-- (A.)L
W
- ------ ---- - - -----
----
M -5
Ajr
C
n/I
-cc A
_-------
Lbvj?
?I
???. - ? -- ?-? -GPs

?a
xev,