20131282 Ver _Information Letter_20091027 (2)

S??
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 27, 2009
MEMORANDUM
To: Kristine O'Connor, P.E., Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT
From: David Wainwright, Division of Water Quality A,
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Response to the Indirect Screening Assessment Report for the proposed NC 32 Connector
from US 64 to the NC 32/NC 94 Intersection, Washington County, TIP R-3620.
This office has reviewed the referenced document dated September 2009. The NC Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
activities that impact Waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Under 15A NAC 2H .0500 (.0506[4]), it is
the NCDWQ's responsibility to ensure that projects do not result in cumulative effects or cause a
violation of downstream water quality based on reasonably anticipated future impacts.
Upon reviewing the information provided in the referenced document, The NCDWQ has concluded that
further cumulative impact analyses are not required. However, please keep us apprised of any additional
information or revisions to the cumulative impact document(s). This decision is based on information
currently provided to us; this decision may change based on updated or new information.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
cc: Bill Biddlecome, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency (electronic copy only)
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: htfp:llh2o,enr.statenc.uslnmetlandsl
One
NorthCarolina
naturally
An Equal Opponunity? Affirmative Action Employer

INDIRECT SCREENING
ASSESSMENT REPORT
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 CONNECTOR FROM US 64
T0NC32/NC94
Washington County,
North Carolina
PREPARED FOR:
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Office of Human Environment
PREPARED BY
HNTB North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609
September, 2009
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Executive Summary
North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R-3620 is a proposed
two-lane road between the US 64/Beasley Road interchange and the NC 32/NC 94 intersection in
Washington County, North Carolina. This project is commonly referred to as the NC 32
Connector. At the time of this assessment, there are two alternatives under consideration.
Alternative 1 is a proposed partial new location facility between US 64 and NC 32/NC94.,
Alternative 1 is approximately 3.4 miles in length. Alternative 2 is the proposed improvement of
Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 32. Alternative 2 is approximately 5.3 miles in length.
Currently, Beasley Road (SR 1139) is a two-lane paved (20 feet wide) facility with grassed
shoulders. Holly Neck Road (SR 1136) is a two-lane paved (20 feet wide) facility with grassed
shoulders. Existing NC 32 is a two-lane paved (24 feet wide) facility with grassed shoulders.
The proposed cross-section is a two-lane shoulder facility with 12-foot travel lanes and 8-foot
grassed shoulders. The anticipated right-of-way width of the proposed project is 80 feet. Limited-
control of access is proposed for portions that would be constructed on new location. Partial
control of access is proposed for portions that would be widened.
According to minutes from the July 2003 Merger 01 Concurrence Meeting, the purpose and need
statement of the project is as follows: The location of the new US 64 creates the need for
improved connectivity within the study area. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve
connectivity in the study area and does not preclude improving the existing facilities.
According to the NCDOT 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), right-of-
way acquisition is programmed for 2012, with construction funding programmed for 2014 and
extending into post years.
A Future Land Use Study Area was delineated to identify the area around the project that could,
in combination with other actions, experience land use changes as a result of STIP Project R-
3620. Although it is the focus for data collection and analysis contained within this report, it is not
meant to infer that land use effects will be felt throughout the Future Land Use Study Area.
Figure 1 displays the Future Land Use Study Area boundaries. Indirect and cumulative effects
associated with STIP Project R-3620 are assessed through 2030.
Based on GIS data from NC OneMap and Washington County, notable features within the Future
Land Use Study Area include five churches, seven cemeteries/graveyards, one National Register
Structure (Rehoboth Methodist Church), one community facility (Skinnersville Civic Center), one
volunteer fire department (Mid-County Volunteer Fire Department), and one park (Pea Ridge
Park). GIS data from NC OneMap indicates that the land on which the community facility and
park are situated is designated as land managed for conservation and open space. The
Skinnersville Civic Center and the Pea Ridge Park are also potential Section 6(f) resources. Both
sides of Beasley Road have timbered, undeveloped areas owned by Weyerhaeuser Company
and used by local hunting clubs.
LI WBS # 34548.1.1
INDIRECT SCREENING
STIP Project R-3620, WBS At 34548.1.1
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94
Washington County
. STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to INC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
The Pea Ridge Convenience Store, located at the intersection of NC 32 and NC 94 is a local
gathering sport that sells hunting licenses and issues burning permits for the NC Forest Resource
office.
NC 32 and NC 94 are designated as hurricane evaluation routes. NC 32 is also designated as NC
Bike Route 3 (Ports of Call).
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has-permanent easements on two parcels located in the
eastern portion of the Future Lane Use Study Area designated as land managed for conservation
and open space (Williams/Priscilla Tarking).
STIP R-3620 is located within sub-basin # 03-01-53 of the Pasquotank River Basin, south of the
Albemarle Sound which is part of the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system. The Albemarle-
Pamlico estuary system is the nation's largest lagoonal estuarine system. According to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) and NC One Map GIS
data, there are no Water Supply Watersheds, no Targeted Local Watersheds, no Wild and Scenic
rivers, no 303(d) listed water bodies, no High Quality Waters, no Outstanding Resource Waters,
and no trout waters in the Future Land Use Study Area for STIP Project R-3620.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program was accessed to obtain a list of Federally-
Protected Species and Natural Communities in the four quadrangles encompassing the Future
Land Use Study Area. The Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) is listed as Endangered
in two of the quadrangles, and the Red Wolf (Canis rufus) is listed as an Endangered,
nonessential experimental population in all four quadrangles. The Lake Phelps Killfish (Fundulus
cf diaphanus), Rafinesque's Big-eared Bat - Coastal Plan Subspecies (Corynorhinus rafinesquii
macrotis) and Black-throated Green Warbler - Coastal Plain Population (Dendroica virens
waynei) are listed as Federal Species of Concern. The 2007 Natural Resource Technical Report
.,
(NRTR) completed by NCDOT also indicates the presence of the American Alligator (Alligator.
mississippiensis) in Washington County. The American Alligator is designated as Threatened
due to similarity of appearance. According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
website, the Endangered Species Act authorizes the treatment of a species (subspecies or
population segment) as threatened even though it is not otherwise listed as threatened if: (a) The
species so closely resembles in appearance a threatened species that enforcement personnel
would have substantial difficulty in differentiating between the listed and unlisted species; (b) the
effect of this substantial difficulty is an additional threat to a threatened species; and (c) such
treatment of an unlisted species will substantially facilitate the enforcement and further the policy
of the Act. The American Alligator has this designation due to similarity of appearance to other
rare crocodilians.
According,to the Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR) completed in November 2007 by
NCDOT, Chapel Swamp and Deep Creek are designated as inland fishing and as Public Trust
Waters. Therefore, both may be considered Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs)..
Encroachment on an AEC resource may require a Major Development Permit per Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) regulations.
As part of this assessment, an Indirect Land Use Effects Screening Matrix was developed for
each alternative to qualitatively assess factors that influence land development decisions. Each
factor received a rating from high concern for indirect effects to less concern for indirect effects.
Based on the information gathered, the ratings in the screening matrix indicate a low to moderate
concern for indirect and cumulative effects as a result of both alternatives.
Alternative 1 (partial new location) has a slightly higher project scope than Alternative 2 (upgrade
existing Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 32). The partial new location section of
Alternative 1 could provide new access to adjacent properties. However, limited control of access
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 321NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
is proposed for all sections to be constructed on new location. Additionally, much of the land
adjacent to the new location section is owned by Weyerhaeuser and used for timber harvesting.
By providing a more direct connection between US 62 and NC 32/NC94, it is anticipated the
travel time savings would be slightly higher with Alternative 1.
Despite the relatively large amount of available land, and the lack of growth management policies
other than the CAMA regulations, most of the categories suggest that further evaluation of
indirect and cumulative effects is not likely to be warranted. Population growth is declining, job
growth is modest, sewer services are not available throughout most of the Future Land Use Study
Area, several areas remain without water service, and the market for development is mostly
lacking. Although several potential developments were discussed with the local officials, these
developments are in the early stages of planning and have not progressed in enough detail for
evaluation as part of this assessment. The lack of approved site plans for each of these potential
developments indicates that there is no clear funding source identified for implementation.
Additionally, because there are no existing plans to expand water and sewer services in the
Future Land Use Study'Area, it is anticipated that much of this potential growth will be
constrained.
Qualitative analyses of the probable development patterns in the Future Land Use Study Area
suggests that STIP R-3620 will have little to no effect on future stormwater runoff or water quality
in the watersheds encompassed by the project.
Cumulatively, STIP Project R-3620 could enhance mobility and could make the area more
attractive for potential development. However, the new location portions of STIP Project R-3620,
will have limited control of access. As a result, access for new developments will be limited
between the US 64/Beasley Road interchange and the intersection of INC 32/NC 94. The
planned implementation of water and sewer service in the area of the US 64/Beasley Road
interchange could make the area more attractive for commercial development. However, there is
no clear funding source identified for implementation of this infrastructure and partial control of
access (i.e., one access point per parcel) is proposed for the widening portion of the project. Due
to its proximity to Albemarle Sound and the availability water service, residential development is
anticipated to continue in the area between Albemarle Sound and Pea Ridge Road. However,
this growth would likely occur with or without the project. Consequently, STIP Project R-3620 will ..
not markedly contribute further to the actions and impacts cited above. Any direct impacts to
natural environmental features (except potential impacts to prime soils) will be furthered
evaluated at permitting by the NCDOT NEU and addressed by programmatic agreements with
the permitting agencies. Additionally, based on the analysis contained within this report, STIP
Project R-3620 would not result in cumulative effects on notable features of the human and/or
natural environment.
No additional indirect and cumulative effects studies are recommended.
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Indirect and Cumulative Effects Introduction
This report documents the information used to assess any future land use changes that could
occur as a result of STIP Project R-3620. The predicted changes, if any, require action from a
non-NCDOT party to occur. The majority of measures taken to avoid, minimize, and decrease
the potential effects associated with future land use changes in the Future Land Use Study Area
would also be coordinated with these parties.
Project Overview
North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R-3620 is a proposed
two-lane road between the US 64/Beasley Road interchange and the NC 32/NC 94 intersection in
Washington County, North Carolina. This project is commonly referred to as the NC 32
Connector. At the time of this assessment, there are two alternatives under consideration.
Alternative 1 is a proposed partial new location facility between US 64 and NC 32/NC 94.
Alternative 1 is approximately 3.4 miles in length. Alternative 2 is the proposed improvement of
Beasley Road, Holly.Neck Road, and NC 32. Alternative 2 is approximately 5.3 miles in length.
Currently, Beasley Road (SR 1139) is a two-lane paved (20 feet wide) facility with grassed
shoulders. Holly Neck Road (SR 1136) is a two-lane paved (20 feet wide) facility with grassed
shoulders. Existing NC 32 is a two-lane paved (24 feet wide) facility with grassed shoulders. NC
32 and NC 94 are also designated hurricane evacuation routes.
The proposed project would construct a two-lane shoulder section with 12-foot travel lanes and 8-
foot grassed. shoulders.. The anticipated right-of-way width of the proposed project is 80 feet.
Limited control of access is proposed for portions that would be constructed on new location.
Partial control of access is proposed for portions that would be widened.
According to minutes from the July 2003 Merger 01 Concurrence Meeting, the purpose and need
statement of the project is as follows: The location of the new US 64 creates the need for
improved connectivity within the study area. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve
connectivity in the study area and does not preclude improving the existing facilities.
According to the NCDOT Traffic Survey Unit, the 2007 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on
NC 32 west of NC 94 was approximately 2,400 vehicles per day (vpd). The 2007 AADT on Holly
Neck Road west of Beasley Road was approximately 180 vehicles per day. The 2007 AADT on
US 64 was 3,800 vpd west of the Beasley Road interchange and 3,700 vpd closer to NC 94. The
2007 AADT on NC 32/NC 94 near the Pea Ridge Road area was 3,600 vpd. Based on
information provided by NCDOT, the Average Daily Traffic in 2025 is estimated at 5,200 to 5,800
vehicles per day along the proposed new location alternative (Alternative 1).
The Washington County 2001 Thoroughfare Plan Study Report indicates that the NC 32
Connector has been included in the NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program as an
identified future need, a feasibility study, or a programmed project since 1996. According to the
NCDOT 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), right-of-way acquisition is
programmed for 2012, with construction funding programmed for 2014 and extending into post
years.
Future Land Use Study Area
The Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) is the area surrounding a project that could be
indirectly affected as a result of the proposed project and other actions. This study area
encompasses all of the areas examined for potential increases in development pressure as a
result of project construction. Although it is the focus for data collection and analysis contained
within this report, it is not meant to infer that land use effects will be felt throughout the Future
Land Use Study Area. The area outlined in yellow and black on Figure 1 is the Future Land Use
WBS # 34548.1.1
(A
Legend: FIGURE 1 Mao Sources
ot
not $rIP PmKq e?ANlt Fe1tY Pin tdlaiE
DOI aTIPPmpq R-W30Ntz North Carolina DOT.. htlp'.Ilww pwot.org

HIO? o eat•M MI., Future Land Use Study N«mcarolina DOT200920155TIP

?
n•n aBfl""50i tline N«th Carolina One Map __.httpuwty rwremapcom
{} uc wqn ay
"' Area (FLUSA) & Wasltington County 6156 Mapping
- S,. [y
? a?aMe•I S^ee.aa^
N
t
bl
F
t
- ?'Mene wu°m^ o MMmeitMbt n.r. o
a
e
ea
ures s
noq a,m.baP ^a ?a

_ A°e•
?r
® sa M1®MMM
tea..
Washington County
STIP Project R-3620
- asamwm?l>oW i? v.,t.leo,.tmrv
0 0.25 QS 1 1.5 2 25
t c"°0" ® r°^••?•^a u°
sw
a September 2009 Mile
q
°.

STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Study Area for STIP Project R-3620. The Future Land Use Study Area is bounded to the north by
Albemarle Sound; parcel lines, Barber Road, unnamed canals and streams, Deep Creek, and US
64 serve as the eastern boundary; unnamed canals serve as the southern boundary, and
Backwoods Road, parcel lines and Pleasant Grove Creek serve as the western boundary.
Time Horizon
Other Transportation and Infrastructure Projects
The 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) includes one other project in the
vicinity (approximately 3.5 miles away) of STIP Project R-3620. STIP Project R4909 is a proposed
new location facility which would connect Newland Road (SR 1126) to East Millpond Road (SR
1125) near the Town of Roper.
US 64 is designated as a Strategic Highway Corridor by the NCDOT Board of Transportation.
Washington County does not have a Long Range Transportation Plan; however, in 2001, NCDOT
prepared a Thoroughfare Plan Study Report in conjunction with Washington County, Federal
Highway Administration and United States Department of Transportation. The Study Report map
does show a planned connection between the US 64 Bypass (US 64) and NC 32. The Plan
identifies this project as the NC 32 Connector. The Plan also indicates that INC 32 is designated
as a major rural collector in the North Carolina statewide functional classification system.
Washington County officials confirmed that there are no other transportation projects planned in
the area.
Transportation Impact Causing Activities
In general, there are two existing routes for traffic wishing to access NC 32 from US 64 and vice
versa. One route utilizes Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 32. Vehicles traveling this route
must pass through Skinnersville and by Basnight-Leary Cemetery, Holly Neck Church of Christ and
cemetery, Rehoboth Methodist Church (a National Register structure), and Oak Grove Baptist
Church and cemetery. The second route utilizes Scuppernong Road and NC 94. The majority of
this route is located outside the Future Land Use Study Area. Vehicles traveling this route must
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
pass by state-owned land and complexes such as the Tyrrell Prison Work Farm, the North Carolina
Forest Service, and an NCDOT equipment maintenance facility.
With the construction of the new location alternative (Alternative 1), vehicles would be able to
access NC 32 and US 64 with a more direct connection. It is anticipated that construction of
Alternative 1 would reduce the length of travel and the travel time between US 64 and NC 32.
However, the associated travel time savings is anticipated to be less than five minutes. Alternative
2 is an upgrade of existing facilities (Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 94). Consequently,
changes in travel patterns or additional travel time savings are expected to be minimal.
Local officials indicated that neither alternative would result in a change of land use patterns, nor
in the demand for higher intensity uses such that the construction of either alternative would
result in increased development because of improved property exposure. Additionally, the project
will not create any new interchanges or intersections. Therefore, the potential for the project to
create a transportation or land use node is limited. Further discussion regarding this issue is
contained in Development Regulations section'of this assessment.
The proposed project would provide improved connectivity between INC 32 and US 64, which is a
primary east-west route between the Outer Banks, the City of Raleigh, and western North
Carolina. US 64 provides access to 1-95, approximately 85 miles west of the US 64/Beasley
Road interchange and several other interstates throughout North Carolina.
Population Trends I Projections
In order to evaluate population' characterisiics'in the Future Land Use Study Area, data from the
North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (NCOSBM) was analyzed. According to
NCOSBM, the population of Washington County declined at a rate of 0.2% annually between
1990 and 2000. Between 2000 and 2029, the population is expected to decline at a rate of 0.3%
annually. Washington County officials confirm that the Future Land Use Study Area would be
expected to experience similar population growth patterns during the time horizon for this report.
However, it was noted that the County is aggressively seeking economic development
opportunities.
Job Trends / Projections
According to the North Carolina Employment Securities Commission (NCESC), from 1996 to
2006, the Northeastern Workforce Development Board (WDB) experienced a 2.6% annual
increase in employment (jobs). This WDB includes Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Gates,
Hyde, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and Washington Counties. The ESC also projects a
1.7% annual increase in jobs between 2006 and 2016. Washington County officials confirm that
the Future Land Use Study Area would be expected to experience similar job growth patterns
during the time horizon for this report.
Job projections past the year 2016 were not available at the time of this assessment.
Municipal Utilities
Washington County does not have a county-wide sewer system. Municipal sewer service is
provided by three municipalities outside the Future Land Use Study Area (Towns of Plymouth,
Roper, and Creswell). However, these municipalities do not have adequate capacity to support
additional service. Residents outside of the three municipalities rely solely on individual septic
tank systems. The County also conducted a study in 2003 to determine the feasibility of
countywide sewer system. The study analyzed seven different scenarios to provide wastewater
service to the County. However, the 2003 study indicated that user rates necessary to establish
a new county-wide treatment facility would be too high to be feasible. It was determined that the
most economically feasible alternative would be to tie into the Town of Roper's sewer system and
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
expand the town's existing facility. Without the expansion of Roper's existing treatment capacity,
a limited amount of customers would be provided with sewer services.
A follow-up wastewater service feasibility study was completed as part of the Washington County-
Albemarle Sound Sustainability Plan in late 2008. The Pea Ridge and NC 32/US 64 areas were
identified as Phase 2 and Phase 3, respectively, of a four-phased approach for implementation of
a county-wide wastewater transmission system. Although the study identified several entities
through which funding and financial support could possibly be obtained, no definitive timeline or
funding source for implementation was provided. Follow-up discussions with Washington County
officials during this assessment confirmed that several other areas of the County would be given
higher priority in terms of phased implementation of the wastewater collection and treatment
system. Therefore, given these considerations, it is anticipated that implementation. of sewer
service is likely several years away.
Washington County owns and operates a regional water system built to serve areas outside of
the town limits of Plymouth, Roper, and Creswell. Washington County GIS data indicates that
water service lines currently exist within the Future Land Use Study Area along Backwoods Road,
NC 32, Pea Ridge Road, NC 94, and Jones White Road. Water distribution lines can also be
found along several subdivision roads located between NC 32, Pea Ridge Road, Barber Road,
and Albemarle Sound. Washington County officials indicated that additional improvements (e.g.,
service line extensions and pumping system enhancements) would be required to accommodate
development beyond what is already approved. Washington County is currently working on a
study to assess the existing water system. It is anticipated that this study will be completed in
approximately three to six months. The study is intended to identify capital improvement projects
for future implementation. Washington County Water Works staff indicated that there are
currently no planned water system capital improvement projects.
Notable Features
Human Environment
The features in this report are identified by using GIS data from NC OneMap, NCDOT, Washington
County, site visit observations, and interviews with local officials. Figure 1 shows the locations of
these human and natural features.
There are no schools located within the Future Land Use Study Area. The Mid-County Volunteer
Fire Department is located on NC 32 north of Pea Ridge Road.
NC 32 and NC 94 are designated as hurricane evaluation routes. According to information
provided by NCDOT, NC 32 is also designated as NC Bike Route 3 (Port of Call). The bike route
follows NC 32/NC 94 from Chowan County south across the Albemarle Sound Bridge and west on
NC 32 towards the Town of Plymouth. Due to the closure of a road through Camp Lejeune, the
NCDOT Division of Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation (DBPT) has suspended distribution of the
"Ports of Call" bike route map. The "Ports of Call" bike route is also known as North Carolina
Bicycling Highway Route 3. DBPT is currently searching for a new bike route around Camp
Lejeune.
Both sides of Beasley Road have timbered, undeveloped areas owned by Weyerhaeuser
Company and used by local hunting clubs.
There are a number of churches and cemeteries located in the Future Land Use Study Area.
According to the Washington County GIS data and field observations, these are:
• Shiloh Church of Christ and Cemetery (west side of NC 32 approximately 0.5 miles
north of NC 32/NC 94 intersection)
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 321NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
• Oak Grove Baptist Church and Cemetery (north side of NC 32 approximately 0.7
miles west of NC 32/NC 94 intersection)
• Rehoboth Methodist Church and Cemetery (south side of NC 32 approximately 1
mile west of NC 32/11C 94 intersection)
• Holly Neck Church of Christ and Cemetery . (west side of Beasley Road
approximately 1.1 miles south of NC 32)
• Basnight-Leary Cemetery (east side of Beasley Road approximately 0.8 miles
north of US 64)
• Piney Grove Free Will Baptist Church (north side of Pea Ridge Road approximately
1.6 miles east of NC 32)
• Biggs Cemetery (approximately 0.1 miles north of Pea Ridge Road)
• Crystal Phelps Graveyard (northeast corner of Pea Ridge Road and Blair Shores
Road)
Rehoboth Methodist Church is also a National Register structure. According to May 27, 2009
Section 404 Public Notice issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District, the
Skinnersville Civic Center, the Hopkins House, and a farm on NC 32 were determined eligible for
inclusion in the National Register. There is also a historical marker about the Holly Neck Church
of Christ located on Holly Neck Road west of the Church.
The Pea Ridge Convenience Store, located at the intersection of NC 32 and NC 94 is a local
gathering sport that sells hunting licenses and issues burning permits for the NC Forest Resource
` office..
There is one community facility (Skinnersville Civic Center) and one park (Pea Ridge Park)
located within the Future Land Use Study Area. These two features are located on the west side
of NC 32 approximately 0.1 miles north of the NC 32/94 intersection. According to Washington
County Planners, the Pea Ridge Park is a county park that includes the Skinnersville Ball Field
and tennis courts. According to NC OneMap GIS information, the land on which the community
center and park are situated is designated as land managed for conservation and open space.
Information provided by NCDOT indicates that the Skinnersville Civic Center was partially funded
through a grant obtained by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, an early agency of the US
Department of the Interior. Further assessment may be required to determine if the Skinnersville
i Civic Center is a Section 6(f) resource. According to the National Park Service Land and Water
Conservation Fund website, Pea Ridge Park is a Section 6(f) resource in Washington County,
NC.
GIS data indicates that the US Fish and Wildlife Service also has permanent easements on two
parcels located in the eastern portion of the Future Land Use Study Area. These parcels are
designated as land managed for conservation and open space (Williams/Priscilla Tarking).
These lands are located along Pea Ridge Road, approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the NC
32/NC 94 intersection.
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to INC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Natural Environment
STIP Project R-3620 is located
Project R-3620 is located
south of the Albemarle Sound,
which is a part of the
Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine
system. The Albemarle-
Pamlico estuary system is the
nation's largest lagoonal
estuarine system. According
to the North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
NC OneMap GIS data indicates that there are wetlands scattered throughout the Future Land Use
Study Area, particularly along Chapel Swamp, Deep Creek, and unnamed streams.
According to GIS data, the majority of land within the Future Land Use Study Area is comprised
of prime farmland.
There is one significant natural heritage area located immediately outside the Future Land Use
Study Area boundary (Bull Neck Swamp).
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program was accessed to obtain a list of Federally-
Protected Species and Natural Communities in the four quadrangles encompassing the Future
Land Use Study Area. The Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenserbrevirostrum) is listed as Endangered
in two of the quadrangles, and the Red Wolf (Canis rufus) is listed as an Endangered,
nonessential experimental population in all four quadrangles. The Lake Phelps Killfish (Fundulus
cf. diaphanus), Rafinesque's Big-eared Bat - Coastal Plan Subspecies (Corynorhinus rafinesquii
macrotis) and Black-throated Green Warbler - Coastal Plain Population (Dendroica virens
wayner) are listed as Federal Species of Concern. The 2007 Natural Resource Technical Report
(NRTR) completed by NCDOT also indicates the presence of the American Alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis) in Washington County. The American Alligator is designated as Threatened
due to similarity of appearance. According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
website', the Endangered Species Act authorizes the treatment of a species (subspecies or
population segment) as threatened even though it is not otherwise listed as threatened if: (a) The
species so closely resembles in appearance a threatened species that enforcement personnel
would have substantial difficulty in differentiating between the listed and unlisted species; (b) the
effect of this substantial difficulty is an additional threat to a threatened species; and (c) such
treatment of an unlisted species will substantially facilitate the enforcement and further the policy
i httg://www,ncnho.orn/Pages/[e-mail], accessed September 2009.
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
of the Act. The American Alligator has this designation due to similarity of appearance to other
rare crocodilians.
According to the Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR) completed in November 2007 by
NCDOT, Chapel Swamp and Deep Creek are designated as inland fishing and as Public Trust
Waters. Therefore, both may be considered Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs).
Encroachment on an AEC resource may require a Major Development Permit per CAMA
regulations.
Development Regulations
Transportation and land use decisions within the Future Land Use Study Area are guided by the
following land use plans and ordinances:
Washington County.,
• Washington County-Albemarle Sound Sustainability Plan (2008)
• Growth Opportunities Plan (2000)
Draft Coastal Area Management Act Land Use Plan (2004)
Zoning Ordinance (Amended 2006)
• Subdivision Ordinance (Amended 1987)
Mobile Home Ordinance & Travel Trailer Ordinance (Amended 1987)
• Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (Amended 2007)
Hazard Mitigation Plan, (2004)
. , ;
• Emergency Operation Plan
• Economic Development Plan (Updated 2006)
• Thoroughfare Plan Study Report (2001)
Copies of some of these documents are unavailable at the time of this assessment. Washington
County officials indicated that the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) requires any
development without a permit to be 75 feet from the mean water mark of all waters in an Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC). According to the 2007 NRTR, the Federal Coastal Zone
Management Act requires that federal actions (i.e., 404 permit issuance) comply with
requirements of state administered coastal zone management programs [16 U.S.C. 1456(c)];
therefore non-AEC impacts in Washington County may require a CAMA consistency
determination as part of the permit process.
Development is allowed in the flood hazard area, provided certain structural requirements are
met.
The Washington County-Albemarle Sound Sustainability Plan was completed by the Washington
County Manager's office and was supported in whole or part by an award from the Rural
Economic Development Center. The intent of this plan was to prepare a strategy for guiding the
location, rate, type, and intensity of the anticipated development and to plan for adequate
infrastructure to support that development. The study area for the Sustainability Plan was
comprised of approximately 72,500 acres, which is more than 30 percent of the Washington
County land area. Discussions with Washington County officials confirmed that there is currently
no funding identified for implementation of the recommendations contained in the plan.
The Sustainability Plan includes a land suitability analysis which considered several factors,
including natural constraints (i.e., soils, floodplains, and wetlands), existing. infrastructure (i.e.
roads, water, and sewer), existing development, and environmentally protected areas. The Plan
also acknowledges that lack of adequate wastewater treatment facilities impedes non-residential
development activity. The land suitability analysis shows that very little land area in the
WBS # 34548.1.1 10
STIP Project R-3620
11. NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Sustainability Plan study area is highly suitable for development. Most of the highly suitable
property is located in areas where sewer is available. There are only 6,684 acres in the
Sustainability Plan study area that represent high suitability for development. Property classified
as medium or low suitability may be able to accommodate development with mitigation of the
conditions that impede development. In general, the vast majority of land approximately 2,500
feet south of NC 32 and within the Future Land Use Study Area is designated 'Least Suitable' or
'Low Suitability'. Land along the north and south side of NC 32 and NC 94 is designated 'Medium
Suitability'. The largest area of high suitability land within the Future Land Use Study Area is
located on both sides of NC 32, north of Pea Ridge Road. A few small pockets of 'High
Suitability' land can also be found near the NC 32/NC 94 intersection.
The Sustainability Plan includes three land development scenarios to illustrate options for the
general spatial distribution of future land use patterns. Development Scenario 3 was selected as
the most desirable pattern of future growth for the study area. This scenario reflects the
expectation for increased second home/retirement housing in close proximity to the Albemarle
Sound shoreline, medium (2 to 8 dwelling units per acre) and high density (6 to 8 dwelling units
per acre) residential growth adjacent to major county road corridors, new non-residential
development primarily concentrated along the US 64 corridor, and the continued use of the
majority of the study area for agricultural and forestry land uses. Despite the designation of the
land surrounding the US 64/NC32 interchange as 'Least Suitable and 'Low Suitability', the area
surrounding the US 64/NC 32 interchange was identified as a future commercial/industrial node.
The NC 32/NC 94 intersection was also identified as a second commercial/industrial node.
Discussion with Washington County officials indicated that the development of these areas,
particularly the NC 32/US 64 interchange, is constrained by lack of sewer and water services.
Available Land
There are approximately 15,168 acres of land within the Future Land Use Study Area.
Approximately 417 acres are covered by the road network and the existing rights-of-way associated
with the roads. Approximately 85 acres are covered by surface waters, streams, creeks, and
canals. Other lands assumed protected from development activities (i.e., lands managed for
conservation and open space) totaled approximately 90 acres. It was assumed that any parcel
without a structure, with a structure valued at less than $10,000, or with a structure on land in
excess of ten acres is available for development. After subtracting these areas from the total land
area, it is estimated that approximately 14,087 acres in the Future Land Use Study Area (or
approximately 93%) could be considered available for development.
Despite the availability of land
as determined in the GIS
analysis, local officials
indicated that there is no
county-wide sewer service
due to the presence of soils
which are not the most
suitable for development.
The lack of sewer service
would be a limiting factor for
development in some of
those areas included in the
calculation of available land.
It should be noted that the
existing tax parcel data used
for this GIS analysis contains
a unique entry for each
WBS # 34548.1.1
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 321NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
recorded parcel owner. As a result, the acreage for parcels having multiple owners could have
been counted more than once during the GIS analysis. However, it is not believed that this factor
would notably affect the overall calculation of land available for development within the Future Land
Use Study Area.
Market for Development
Current Development Pressures
Local officials are supportive of residential and non-residential growth. Washington County is
designated by the North Carolina Department of Commerce as a Tier 1 County. It is one of the 40
most distressed counties in the State, and it could receive tax credits from the State as a way to
encourage economic activity. Washington County also partners with various agencies, such as
North Carolina's Northeast Economic Development Commission, that offer support for economic
development projects. The County recently implemented the Washington County Economic
development Performance Grant Program (EDPGP) to support new and expanding businesses
within the county2. However, local officials indicate that residential and non-residential growth is
slow throughout the Future Land Use Study Area. Over the last year, this area has experienced a
slight decline in market demand due to generally poor economic conditions and outlook.
Washington County officials indicate that no redevelopment is occurring in the Future Land Use
Study Area. Most new residential growth in the County has been occurring in the northern portion
of the Future Land Use Area near the Albemarle Sound and Pea Ridge Road. Waterside at the
Point, located on the west side of NC 32/NC 94 on the Albemarle Sound, is a community focused
on'attracting retirees. One multi-family residential building (12 units) has been constructed and
additional multi-family residential buildings (12 units each) and a clubhouse have been approved.
According to the site plan on the developer's website3, the planned build-out of the development
calls for approximately 175 residential units consisting of condominiums, townhomes, and single-
family residences. Additionally, three subdivisions (approximately 140 total lots) have been
approved for development. These subdivisions (Sandridge, Sandridge II, and Cedar Shores) are
located on the north side of Pea Ridge Road between NC 32/NC 94 and Barber Road. However,
the current unfavorable economic conditions have stalled all approved residential development in
the Future Land Use Study Area.
Washington County officials indicate that a single-family residential subdivision is planned in the
area of the Alternative 1 alignment. However, at the time of this assessment, no approved site plan
exists for this development. According to local officials, no commercial, retail, office or industrial
developments have been approved or are pending.
Prior to the economic downturn, options were placed on several large tracts of land in the northern
portion of the Future Land Use Study Area. These tracts were under consideration for residential
development. According to local officials, one particular concept would have resulted in
approximately 575 residential units. However, no site plans have been submitted or approved for
any of these potential residential developments. Additionally, local officials indicate that water
service and/or pump system upgrades would be required to serve development beyond what is
already approved. At the time of this assessment, none of these required infrastructure
improvements are planned by the County.
The County is also studying the feasibility of a government services center complex within the
Future Land Use Study Area. The complex may consist of a medical clinic (with pharmacy),
fire/EMS/law enforcement facility, and a library. A commercial component is also under
2 Washington County, NC website, www.washconc.org/edc/incentivesandtaxes,html, accessed July 2009.
3 Waterside at the Point website, www.watersideatthenoint.com, accessed July 2009.
WBS # 34548.1.1 12
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to INC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
consideration for implementation by the County or by a' private developer. The commercial
component would be service-oriented with a gas station, specialty shops, and food service. At
the time of this assessment, there are currently three sites under consideration for the complex and
no site plan has been developed or approved. One site is located in the area of the Pea Ridge
Road/NC 32/NC 94 intersection, a second site is located at the Benson Road interchange, and the
third site is at the US 64/Beasley Road interchange. At the time of this assessment, no site
selection has been made. County officials indicate that once a site is selected, engineering work
will commence to develop the site plan. However, no municipal, utility service exists or is planned
for implementation in this area. This, in combination with no identified funding source, may serve as
a constraint to potential development of the center.
Washington County is also focused on attracting biotechnology companies to the area. As part of
this focus, the County has partnered with the Vernon G. James Research Center to identify a
potential location for a future biotechnology research and development facility. The initial site
identified for this facility is in the area of the US 64/Beasley Road interchange. The estimated
timeline for this potential development is approximately five to ten years away. However, as
indicated previously, lack of municipal utilities and a specific funding source(s) may serve as a
constraint to any potential development in this area.
Development Market Assumptions
Current development trends are expected to continue through 2030. There is expected to be a
modest increase in jobs (1.7%) between 2006 and 2016. Population, on the other hand, is
expected to decrease slightly (-0.2%) between now and 2029. These factors suggest that
demand for residential and non-residential land will stay about the same as they are currently.
Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Methodology and Matrix
An Indirect Land Use Effects Screening Matrix (see Tables 1 and 2) was developed for each
alternative to qualitatively assess factors that influence land development decisions. The
matrices rate the influence of each category from high concern for indirect effects to less concern
for indirect effects. The measures used to rate the effects from a high concern for indirect effects
potential to less concern for indirect effects potential are also supported by documentation. Each
characteristic is assessed individually and the results of the table are looked at comprehensively
to determine the indirect and cumulative effects potential of the proposed project. The scope of
the project and change in accessibility categories are given extra-weight to determine if future
growth in the area is related to the project modifications. Further examination of potential indirect
and cumulative effects will be undertaken on projects that have more categories noted as
moderate to high concern.
Table 1. Indirect and Cumulative Land Use Effects Screening Matrix - Alternative 1
FOmUSIeO 1...Ws id NoUbN

- scope of Change In p aPabM ?WasptlSSwer- . MaMetlar .

Pro?ecl
pccecal0111ry Popubtlon E
w wnC
Land"
RVaYablllry .
9evebpmenl Publk Polley
- Environmental
' ResuX
Ratio GmwrM1 Gna
GrowN FadWrta
alp mMe 3% annual suMlaMal n of
" Al aerr u Loss sbryem: TWWW,d or
Aver. ea Iuru, "QRun New bbs O?PCresM
SP es60rol cesebgnem m6- Tmealx,N
Mora IACalon savYgs 'Wo ErloWw avaiww amiwry aburclam maaaemem Resource
Concern
1 X
T X
?..........• X X
X X X Mi311-
l Na wl.,
1 X X
Lass

ncam
C

wery LmnM

Woaseleme

No {gslalur
-
Wv
Jobs .1

linb]LeM Wservtt

e,ebpnM
'esploeW,
FeAwes

ScOR
sawgs
proton
bblraes
pvpaNle avdivde mww
? ? PPSM KMMNNVb[Y
mrlNe ma a,emert p..
WBS # 34548.1.1 13
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Table 2. Indirect and Cumulative Land Use Effects Screening Matrix - Alternative 2
Scope oL Ctranp h F recested F e.M.d -A aAbk ;a is..."
MaA
el for Notable

Pfact
Accessltrlltly P yul lbn E ObYlnenL
'Land _AV lbyr Developme
Development Public Policy Envlronmenlal RBSuX -_
Rath G.th Growth = Features
a1o ruses 3% annual Su... .0 Gl se__ Less strsyen; trpelMa
_
on t.1 one WpM1V'n Mw bGs '??esd erSErg/ Deueblanen roPOwm Tineds.
More Iad a"'qz 9oe'dr Egx[M a+aiade a[tiuAY ab'anen mae,arnerno Res.re
Concern
x
1 x
X
j x x

t x x x x

ss

Con[em
Very L'meN
WVaveltime
Wpup,latnn
Wmv bth or
LmAM Land Ib service
DerebpneM '',
rpeM
str
We
Fe&
ues

S.,
sac."
B?owtlr OF deduce
Job Loses
A.W
Md1??
ti
artrrilyl 1.1 pr
ovM mcorpun
lN
'm bcal
'
e ma, JemeM y0LL bn
Screening Matrix Results for STIP Project R-3620
Based on the information gathered, the categories in the screening matrix indicate a low to
moderate concern for indirect and cumulative effects as a result of both alternatives.
Alternative 1 (partial new location) has a slightly higher project scope than Alternative 2 (upgrade
existing Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 32). The partial new location section of
Alternative 1 could provide new access to adjacent properties. However, limited control of access
is proposed for all sections to be constructed on new location. Additionally, much of the land
adjacent to the new location section is owned by Weyerhaeuser and used for timber harvesting.
By providing a more direct connection between US 62 and INC 32/NC94, it is anticipated the
travel time savings would be slightly higher with Alternative 1.
Despite the relatively large amount of available land, and the lack of growth management policies
other than the CAMA regulations, most of the categories suggest that further evaluation of
indirect and cumulative effects is not likely to be warranted. Population growth is declining, job
growth is modest, sewer services are not available throughout most of the Future Land Use Study
Area, several areas remain without water service, and the market for development is mostly
lacking. Although several potential developments were discussed with the local officials, these
developments are in the early stages of planning and have not progressed in enough detail for
evaluation as part of this assessment. The lack of approved site plans for each of these potential
developments indicates that there is no clear funding source identified for implementation.
Additionally, because there are no existing plans to expand water and sewer services in the
Future Land Use Study Area, it is anticipated that much of this potential growth will be
constrained.
Indirect Effects Summary Statement
The construction of STIP Project R-3620 will provide improved connectivity within the Future
Land Use Study Area. Although there is an abundance of available land in the Future Land Use
Study Area, growth is limited by Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulations, limited
infrastructure, and a weak residential and non-residential market. This trend is anticipated to
continue with or without the project.
Qualitative analyses of the probable development patterns in the Future Land Use Study Area
suggests that STIP Project R-3620 will likely not result in a marked increase in impervious
surface; therefore, it will have little to no effect on future stormwater runoff or water quality in the
watersheds encompassed by the project.
WBS # 34548.1.1 14
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 321NC 94 in Washington County
_ Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Cumulative Effects Summary Statement
Due to the lack of water and sewer service in much of the Future Land Use Study Area, the
overall population decline, as well as the general economic conditions, the development market
has been slow. There has been some development, primarily residential (second homes and
retirement homes), in the Future Land Use Study Area. However, this development has occurred
on the fringes of the Future Land Use Study Area and is not related to the construction of STIP
Project R-3620. Even with the construction of the US 64 Bypass and the interchange at
Beasley Road, the development market has remained slow.
Cumulatively, STIP Project R-3620 could enhance mobility and could make the area more
attractive for potential development. However, the new location portions of STIP Project R-3620
will have limited control of access. As a result, access for new developments will be limited
between the US 64/Beasley Road interchange and the intersection of NC 32/NC 94. The
planned implementation of water and sewer service in the area of the US 64/Beasley Road
interchange could make the area more attractive for commercial development. However, there is .
no clear funding source identified for implementation of this infrastructure and partial control of
access (i.e., one access point per parcel) is proposed for the widening portion of the project. Due
to its proximity to Albemarle Sound and the availability water service, residential development is
anticipated to continue in the area between Albemarle Sound and Pea Ridge Road. However, ,
this growth would likely occur with or without the project. Consequently, STIP Project R-3620 will
not markedly contribute further to the actions and impacts cited above. Any direct impacts to
natural environmental features (except potential impacts to prime soils) will be furthered
evaluated at permitting by the NCDOT NEU and addressed by programmatic agreements with
the permitting agencies. Additionally, based on the analysis contained within this report, STIP
Project R-3620 would not result in cumulative effects on notable features of the human and/or
natural environment.
Conclusions and Next Steps
No additional indirect and cumulative effects studies are recommended.
According to NCDOT, a farmland conversion form has been prepared and submitted to the
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and a response is forthcoming. This is to be
followed by a technical memo, if needed, for incorporation into the Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
WBS # 34548.1.1 15
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 321NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
Sources:
Aerial photography from Google, www.google.com, accessed July 2009.
Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program, htti)://www.apnep.org/index.htmi, accessed,
August 2009.
Keyes, Anne, Washington County Planning Director, Telephone interview, August 3, 2009.
Keyes, Anne and Esolen, Tim, Washington County Planning Department, Interview, June 26,
2009 and September 22, 2009.
Manring, Louis, Washington County Utilities Director, Telephone interview, July 31, 2009
NC One Map, www.nconemap.com, accessed December 2007 and January 2009
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
http://h2a.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/General 303d.htm, 2006 Final 303(d) List of Impaired
Waterbodies, accessed July 2009.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, www.ncnhp.org, Natural
Heritage Program, accessed July 2009.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Natural Resource Technical Report - NC 32
Connector, November 2007.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Roadway Design Unit, MicroStation Design Files,
transferred via NCDOT File Transfer System, July 2009.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement
Program.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Strategic Highway Corridor Map, Division 1, March
29, 2004.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Thoroughfare Plan Study Report for Washington
County, October 2001.
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Traffic Survey Unit, 2007 Washington County
Traffic Volume (AADT) Map, www.ncdot org/it/imq/Data Distribution/TrafficSurveyMaps/, accessed
July 2009.
North Carolina Employment Security Commission, www.ncese.com, 1990, 2000, 2007 data and
projections to 2016, accessed June 2009.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, http://www.ncnhp.or-q/Pages/heritagedata.html,
accessed September 2009.
North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management, www.osbm.state.ne.us, 2010-2030
projections, accessed June 2009.
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us, accessed July 2009
Peoples, David, Washington County Manager, Telephone interview, July 31, 2009.

WBS # 34548.1.1 16
STIP Project R-3620
NC 32 Connector from US 64 to NC 32/NC 94 in Washington County
Indirect Screening Assessment
September 23, 2009
United States Census Bureau, www.census.gov, 1990 and 2000 population data, accessed June
2009.
United State Army Corp of Engineers - Wilmington District, May 27, 2009 Section 404 Public
Notice, http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/WETLANDS/notices.html accessed August 2009.
Washington County, North Carolina, Washington County-Albemarle Sound Sustainability Plan,
November 2008.
Washington County, North Carolina, website, http://www.washconc.orq, accessed July 2009.
Waterside at the Point website, www.watersideatthepoint.com, accessed July 2009.
WBS # 34548.1.1 17
X NTB
Project: STIP Project R-3620
Subject: Indirect Land Use Screening Assessment
Meeting Date and Time: 6/26/09, 8:30am
Meeting Location: Washington County Emergency Operations and Planning Center
205 East Main Street
Plymouth, NC
Present:
Ann Keyes Washington County Planning and Safety Director
Tim Esolen Washington County GIS and Mapping Director
Louis Manring Washington County Utilities Director
-Susan Paschal HNTB
Paige Dixon HNTB
The purpose of this meeting was to obtain feedback related to STIP Project R-3620 in Washington
County. Meeting discussion and this assessment is based on two alternatives. Alternative 1 is a two lane
shoulder facility on new location between US 64 and NC 32/94. Alternative 2 proposes upgrades to
existing Beasley Road, Holly Neck Road, and NC 32. HNTB is preparing an Indirect Land Use Screening
Assessment for this STIP Project. HNTB presented a figure showing notable features and the proposed
Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA). Discussion included:
• Ms. Keyes, who grew up in Washington County, has been in county government for 34 years, and
is currently the Washington County Director of Planning and Safety. Mr. Esolen has lived in the
area for over 30 years, and has been working with Washington County GIS mapping for five
years. Mr. Esolen is also a local land surveyor.
• Washington County has a Subdivision Ordinance on its website. Ms. Keyes mentioned that
Washington County also has a Zoning Ordinance, Mobile Home Ordinance, Junk Car Ordinance,
and Flood Ordinance.
• Ms. Keyes indicated that all three incorporated towns, in conjunction with the County, are part of
the updated 2004 CAMA Land Use Plan, which is scheduled for review and approval by the
County's Planning Board in July 2009.
• Washington County also has a 2001 Thoroughfare Plan, and Emergency Operations Plan (on-
line), and an Economic Development Plan.
• Ms. Keyes indicated that she would mail a copy of all relevant plans and ordinances to Paige
Dixon as soon as possible.
• The proposed Future Land Use Study Area, which was presented on a figure by HNTB, extended
from Pleasant Grove Creek in the west to Scuppernong Road in the east. The northern boundary
was the Albemarle Sound, and the southern boundary was based on parcel lines and unnamed
canals (south of US 64). Ms. Keyes and Mr. Esolen stated that the proposed Future Land Use
Study Area extended too far east and could be reduced in that area. Mr. Esolen indicated that
much of the Alternative 1 alignment goes through lands owned by Weyerhaeuser.
• Mr. Esolen stated that he would email relevant Washington County GIS shapefiles to Paige
Dixon. Files received include: parcel data, cemeteries, churches, buildings, streets, city limits,
county water lines, fire hydrants, high voltage transmission lines, lakes, land use, Roper water
lines, zoning, and new subdivisions.
• The planners refer to the NC 32/94 area near the northern terminus of the project as the "Pea
Ridge Y" area. They mentioned that Shiloh Church of Christ and Cemetery is located near the
"Pea Ridge Y" area and some parks are near the church. Also within the Future Land Use Study
Page 1 of 3
Minutes of STIP Project R-3620 Meeting 6/26/09 (cont'd)
Area are Oak Grove Baptist Church and Cemetery, Holly Neck Church of Christ and Cemetery,
and Skinnersville Civic Center.
• There are no FEMA buyout properties located in Washington County according to Ms. Keyes and
Mr. Esolen.
• Mr. Esolen corrected two labels on HNTB's figure. The label for B Canal Road should be
changed to Shore Drive, and A Canal Road should be changed to B Canal Road. Mr. Esolen
mentioned that Tyson Road may be changed to Northline Road at some point. He also indicated
that it is a private farm road.
• Ms. Keyes expressed concern regarding access to the proposed project. She wants to ensure
that emergency vehicles would be able to access the proposed facility in order to serve citizens in
a timely manner.
• From May to September, most traffic on NC 32 and NC 94 is beach traffic going to and from Dare
County. Locals mostly use NC 32 and NC 94, whereas others use US 64. The planners
indicated that the.signage,on these roads is confusing; and mentioned that they had to re-
address 470 homes when the old US 64 was changed to NC 32.
• According to Ms. Keyes, there are no proposed local transportation projects in the Future Land
Use Study Area.
• The planners stated that there is a sketch plan of a subdivision, which is located in the path of the
project alignment at NC 32/94. The subdivision has not yet been approved.
• Waterside at the Point is a community marketed for retirees and located on the west side of NC
32/94 on the Albemarle Sound. The community currently consists of one building with 12
waterfront condominiums, and a single family home. Four additional condominium buildings (12
units each) and a clubhouse have been approved, but the slow economy has stalled plans for-, : .
construction. Washington County planners also stated that Waterside at the Point may include
single family homes in the future.
• Mr. Esolen indicated that several other subdivisions have been approved in the area - one with
approximately 60 lots, one with approximately 25 lots and one with approximately 30 lots -
however, construction has not begun because of the slow economy. These subdivisions are
included in the new subdivision layer which he will provide HNTB. Information provided to HNTB
subsequent to this meeting indicated that the three approved subdivisions included approximately
140 lots.
• Employment centers include the hospital in Plymouth, Washington County School System, and
Weyerhaeuser Company in Martin County. Local forestry / agricultural business, as well as the
NCDOT and NC Forest Service employ many residents in the Future Land Use Study Area.
• The planners mentioned that growth in the area is occurring near the Albemarle Sound and Pea
Ridge Road (near the northern terminus of the proposed project). In addition, they felt that the
Scuppernong Road area near the "drag strip" may be an area for potential growth unrelated to
STIP Project R-3620.
• The planners described the residential, commercial, and industrial markets as slow. Building
permit requests have declined and foreclosures have increased. They are seeing more
renovations than new construction.
• Washington County does not have a sewer system; however, they are conducting a sewer
feasibility study to determine if sewer can be extended from the Towns. The Towns of Plymouth,
Roper, and Creswell have their own sewer systems.
• Washington County has county-wide water. The County is considering extending water service.
However, no current plans exist for the water service extensions. Washington County will provide
a GIS shapefile that shows the locations of existing water lines.
• The capacity of the current water system is 250 gallons per minute. Washington County officials
stated that water lines would need to be extended and water capacity would need to be increased
in order to build all of the new homes that have been approved in the area.
Page 2 of 3
Minutes of STIP Project R-3620 Meeting 6/26109 (cont'd)
• Development constraints in the area include lack of sewer services, wetlands, soils, floodplains,
agriculture, forestry, and Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in the southeast portion of the
County.
• The planners stated that the local commitment to development is pro-growth, and the political
climate is stable.
• Washington County designated by the North Carolina Department of Commerce as a Tier 1
jurisdiction, and the County Manager can be contacted regarding additional development
incentives.
• According to Ms. Keyes, there are no development moratoria in the area.
• The planners do not expect the construction of STIP Project R-3620 to lead to any land use
changes in the Future Land Use Study Area.
• Ms. Keyes and Mr. Esolen stated that the employment and population growth projections
presented by HNTB for the Future Land Use Study Area were reasonable. These projections
were based on and identical to County projections provided by the North Carolina Office of State.
Budget and Management, and the North Carolina Employment Security Commission. Local
officials expect employment projections to mirror population projections in the area. They stated
that the County is aggressively seeking economic opportunities, and see a possibility for increase
in the future. Ms. Keyes recommends contacting the County Manager or Economic Development
Director for further information on this project:
• The planners were not aware of any citizen concerns or controversy related to STIP Project R-
3620. They indicated that they are ready for the project, and Alternative 1 appears to be the most
logical option (unofficially) because of fewer displacements and fewer land owners.
According to Ms. Keyes, there are no voluntary or enhanced voluntary agricultural districts in the
County.
• She indicated that there are not any public or private policies to protect farmland in Washington
County either, except that a bona fide farm is exempt from County zoning regulations.
• The planners indicated that several farm support services are available in the County, including
3M Grain, Farmers Exchange in Plymouth, Plymouth Farmer's Market, and Sunny Side Elevator.
• Crops grown in the area include soybeans, cotton, peanuts, potatoes, and tobacco.
cc: Attendees
Project File
Page 3 of 3