NCG160015_MONITORING INFO_20170717

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT N0.
�V � 1 � bb
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑��ONITO:RINGREPORTS
DOC DATE
❑
YYYYMMDD

AYMEAD,M)
July 14, 2017
1210410] 2LI:i
Matthew E. Gantt, PE
405 West Hanes Mill Road #300
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
RE: Maymead Materials — Jefferson Plant
NOV-2017-SP-0005
NCG 160015
Dear Mr. Gantt,
ti
AGGREGATES • AGRICULTURE • ASPHALT _
W.B. Roark May M. Roark
President Secretary/Treasurer
Thomas G. Purpur
Vice -President
P.O. Box 911 Mountain City, TN 37683
[phone] Fax [phone]
NC Deportrrent of
Environmenta} Quality
Received
JUL 1/2017
Winston-Salenr
Regional Office
On June 21, 2017, your office performed a mulimedia inspection at our Jefferson Plant. This included the storm
water permit refernced above. The Qualitative Monitoring Reports where not in the book that the plant operator
presented to Mr. Williams. The reports where located in the testing lab in a separate binder that 1 had placed there as
I am the person that performs these inspections. Most often when these inspections are performed, there has been a
rain out event for our construction work and the plant operating crew is not at the facility. I have access to the testing
lab, but the plant control house is under different lock and key for security reasons.
Attached to this letter are the Qualitative Monitoring Reports that were performed for the last two years.
This issue has been corrected. I have placed the reports in the book that the plant operator has in the control house.
In the future, these reports will be given to the operator. In the event that the operator is not present, a copy will be
emailed to the operator to print and place in the book that is maintained in the control house.
Should your office require additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
Sean Mackey
Project Manager
ATTACHMENTS
PILE —Jefferson NDPES
Tennesse • Virginia • North Carolina
www.maymead.com

.....�.. �' NC Departrn^r3t of
IWDENR Environmental Quality
5tormwater Discharge Outfall (00) JUL 17 2017
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Winston-Sa!em
Reeiona! Office
Forguidance on filling out this form, please visit:to
Permit No.: �/� f_/_/_/_/�- /_I or Certificate of Coverage No.: L_/C/_G/-1/ja/ _L/W
Facility Name: erre Im5cz. A
County: ASw _ Phone No. !ul _art L0=C => ---
Inspector:
Date of Inspection: _A, tc — l
Time of inspection: tZ . 4-1
Total Event Precipitation (inches): �^
Was this a "Representative Storm. Event" or "Mensureable Storm Event" as defined by the permit?
(See information below.)
tYes ❑ No
Please verify whether Qualitative Monitoring must be performed during a "representative storm
event" or "measureable storm event" (requirements vary, depending an the permit).
Qualitative monitoring requirements vary. Most permits require qualitative monitoring to be
i performed during a "representative storm event" or during a "measureable storm event." However,
some permits do not have this requirement. Please refer to these definitions, if applicable.
A "representative storm event" is a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall
and that is preceded by at least 72 hours (3 days) in which no storm event measuring greater than
0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no
precipitation.
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the
permitted site outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours
prior. The 72-hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter
interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee
obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office_
By this signatge, I certify that this rMrt is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
or
Page 1 of 2
SWU-242, Last modified 7/31/2013

1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No. Structure (pi e, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: G
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfah drainage area:
2. Color. Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors: 'qagkN — MQ , ..I-
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil,
weak chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is
clear and 5 is very cloudy:
2 3 4 5
S. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in
the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended
solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5
7. is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes <TD
8. is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfaV Yes
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of Foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition
may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
Page 2 of 2
SWU1 242,List modified 7/31/200

�� h
KUHR
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out thisform, please visit: her p://portal.ncdenrorg/web/lr/nodes•stormwater/
Permit No.: �Jf /� j_/j /�/_/_/ or Certificate of Coverage No.:
Facility Name: �1e~Ff.� �
County: v, Phone No.
Inspector Nor,
Date of Inspection: i — — td
Time of Inspection: 31.1 E21 i-1w^
Total Event Precipitation (inches): � , .►8
Was this a "Representative Storm Event" or "Measureable Storm Event" as defined by the permit?
(See information below.)
® Yes ❑ No
Please verify whether Qualitative Monitoring must be performed during a "representative storm
event" or "measureabie storm event" (requirements vary, depending an the permit).
..... _.
Qualitative monitoring requirements vary. Most permits require qualitative monitoring to be _
performed during a "representative storm event" or during a "measureabie storm event" However, p.
i some permits do not have this requirement. Please refer to these definitions, if applicable.Ir I
A "representative storm event" is a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall
and that is preceded by at least 72 hours (3 days) in which no storm event measuring greater than
0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10consecutive hours of no
precipitation.
i
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the l
permitted site outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours
prior. The 72-hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter 1
interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee
obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office.
By this si n , I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
r .
of Permittee or Desig
Page 1 of 2
SWU-242, Last modified 7/31/2013

1. Outfail Description:
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:. . -*Ak , ,%_� — uc> t csd ;�: C;c
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area.
2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors: 'v— L-' ,k'r-
3, odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil,
weak chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is
clear and 5 is very cloudy:
1 (i) 3 4 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in
the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended
solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes QNo
g. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes 1Vo
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No
10. other Obvious Indicators ofStormwater Pollution:
List and describe
Rote: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition
may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
r-
Page 2 of 2
Sy�'(�•242, last modified 7J31JZ013
i
to

MUM
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on f111irtg out this form, please visit: tip:llportaj.ncdgnr.orE/web/lr/npdes-stormtvater/
Permit No.: �€/�/�_l_ 1��1or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/�/�
{ ; Facility Name: A#
County: Phone No.
Inspector: Gc
Date of Inspection: --7
Time of Inspection: o
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Was this a "Representative Storm Event" or "Measureable Storm Event" as defined by the permit?
(See information below.)
Yes ❑ No
Please verify whether Qualitative Monitoring must be performed during a "representative storm
event" or "rneasureable storm event' (requirements vary, depending on the permit).
Qualitative monitoring requirements vary, Most permits require qualitative monitoring to bemT _ !
performed during a "representative storm event" or during a "measureable storm event" However,
some permits do not have this requirement. Please refer to these definitions, if applicable.
1
t A "representative storm event' is a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall
and that is preceded by at least 72 hours (3 days) in which no storm event measuring greater than
0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no 1
precipitation. '
1
1
3
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the t
permitted site out€all. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours I
` prior. The 72-hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter
j interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the perrnittee
E obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office:
By this sigpalure, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
f
(Signature of Permittee or De
Page ] of 2
SWU-242, Last modined 7/31/2013

1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No, �.... Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:. -- -0 !!C-- .�- -- _ (f%VA. L)" E
Describe the industrial acti ities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil,
weals chlorine odor, etc.).-
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is
clear and 5 is very cloudy:
2 3 4 5
S. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in
the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
C 2 3 4
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which hest describes the amount of suspended
solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy.
2 3 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes <NOD
8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
4. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No
10, Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe CX
Lam+
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition
may be indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
Page Zof2
SWU,242, Last modified 7/31/2013

=r
r
Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
FNVFRONME14TAL QUALITY
June 26, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL 47015 0640 0005 8164 4382
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Willie B Roark (President)
Maymead Materials Inc.
P.O. Box 911
Mountain City, TN 37683
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2017-SP-0005
Permit No. NCG 160015
Maymead Materials, Inc. — Jefferson Plant
Ashe County
Dear Mr. Roark:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
On June 21, 2017 Paul Williams, Environmental Specialist with the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality — Division of Air Quality (NCDEQ — DAQ) conducted a multimedia
inspection with Steve Wright, Plant Manager at the facility located at 180 Andy Fowler Road in
Ashe County. This was a compliance inspection regarding the asphalt plants air quality and
stormwater permits.
The facilities most recent prior inspection was conducted on July 22, 2015 by Glen White and
Sue White of DEMLR. At the time of that inspection. Maymead did not have a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan and was not providing qualitative monitoring. No records were
available to review. Significant improvement has been made since that date but qualitative
monitoring has not been conducted to date.
This facility holds General Stormwater Permit NCG160015 to discharge stormwater from
industrial activity associated with Paving Mixtures and Blocks [SIC 29511 under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The permit became effective October 1,
2014 and expires on September 30, 2019. A copy of the current permit is required to be
maintained with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) documents. The current
permit was available for review and was included in the SPPP at the time of inspection.
State, of Norrh Carolina I Environmental Qwtlty I Cnerg7 , mineral and Land Resources
w nsto,7-5tdern Regional Office 1 450 Hanes Mil] Road, Suitt 300 1 Wjnston-Salern. NC: 27103
33h 776 9800

This facility was required to develop and maintain a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SPPP) in accordance with Part 1I, Section A of the permit_ All qualitative and analytical
monitoring records are required to be maintained with the SPPP for a minimum of five (5) years.
At the latest inspection, the SPPP appeared to be current but no monitoring has been conducted
in accordance with the permit. The facility is only required to provide qualitative monitoring
because stormwater from all industrial activity drains to a retention pond that does not discharge
to offsite waters.
The following observations and violations were noted during the NCDEQ multimedia inspection
and subsequent file review:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan:
General Permit NCG 160000, Part 11 Section C requires the permittee to conduct
qualitative monitoring at each outfall twice each year. Monitoring requires person
conducting monitoring to go to each outfall twice each year and document on the
qualitative monitoring form what was observed. It's a visual inspection only. Fill out a
separate form for each outfall. Again, outfalls will need to be determined and
documented on a siteplan to be included in the SPPP. Please begin monitoring twice (2)
annually as permit requires.
Your Required Response:
Accordingly, you are directed to respond to this letter in writing within 30 calendar days of
receipt of this Notice. Your response should outline how the violations will be addressed and
should be sent to this office at the letterhead address and include the following:
uali:tiative Monitoring: Begin qualitative monitoring at the retention pond and keep
records with the SPPP. Monitoring should identify color, odor, clarity, floating solids,
suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, erosion or deposition and any other obvious indication
of pollution. A photo taken at of the water at the time of inspection provides excellent
documentation.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. This Office is considering sending a
recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the DEMLR (Division of Energy, Minerals,
& Land Resources) regarding these issues and any future/continued violations that may be
encountered. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated
immediately and properly resolved. Environmental damage and/or failure to secure proper
authorizations have been documented on the subject tract as stated above. Your efforts to
undertake activities to bring the subject site back into compliance is not an admission, rather it is
an action that must be taken in order to begin to resolve ongoing environmental issues.
State of North Carohna i Envirunmental Quallty j Energy, Mirf rai and Land Resources
VV-mston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 Hanes tyllil Road. Suite 300 1 Winsrorn-Salern. NC -7710 J
33b 7761)800

Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Your
above -mentioned response to this correspondence, the degree and extent of harm to the
environment and the duration and gravity of the violation(s) will be considered in any civil
penalty assessment process that may occur. Should you have any questions regarding these
matters, please contact Glen White at [phone].
Sincerely,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: Inspection Report
Qualitative Monitoring Forms (2 sided)
cc: DEMLR — WSRO
DEMLR — Stormwater Permitting Unit
DAQ - WSRO
State of `ort h Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resowr,"
Wnston-Saiem Regional Office' 450 Hanes 1011 Road. Suite 300 ' Kinston -Salem, NC 27103
336 rib 9800

E
■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the rnatiplece,
or on the front if space permits,
Maymead Materiais Inc.
Attn: Willie B Roark
PO Box 911
MOUntain City, TN 37683
I� u � ri r►,tci; n - NGG i 01-i
❑ Addressee l
Recei eci by (PlOted Name) C. Date of Delivery
-CA , r V O [ n�S _ �� - a.Fs--r a
D. Is delivery address different from item I? O Yes �
1f YES, enter delivery address below; ❑ No I
1
I
I
I
I��I�IIII��111�I�IgIIIkIElIIIIIIII! 0 Maffm
s a ResWded
9590 9402 2293 6226 6846 43 ❑ Certified Mall Ra&Icted 0911my 0 Retwa 1�eCapt for
0 Collect on Delivery Merchandbe
Y. Artich Ntrnhw Marambr fins. spndeg fahall (3 Cooed on DeOvery ROE dad oeUveJy 0 Signamrs Conf'umaJwSm
0 M%nd Mall 0 Ssgnswre Confirmation �
17015 0640 0005 8164 4 3 8 2' fl� tau icy Ae*fcted Delivery ,
Ps Form 3811, duty 2015 PSN 7530-02-OOtf-9053 -7 Domestic Rmm Receipt
CO
Domesticru
m
x
F Land Qualt L
U S E
.11
V-q
k
CeMfmd Mae Fee
im,IhmeJ,A
$
NC G - ! ( 01 a
F�ctra Services& Fees !check bac add ll,e u 4aA'uprWO
❑
�
ILNn tea+ fi�aavrl S —
F]Aen. Racw (aftrudd $
Posbnark
©
QCerMW Melt Ra MRad PMVey S
Here
QAdWI Signature Requyea $
0 Aduft Signsmro Re97icted Oe Nmy S
a
Postage n
-I-
S
Q
Total Posts Maymead Materials Inc.
Ln
s Attn: Willie B Roark
seer r�.
Cl
PO Box 911
Sneer a/l;y r
Mountain City, TN 37683

I • l
Permit: NCG160015
SOC:
County: Ashe
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Scott Ross
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/02/14 Expiration: 09/30/19 Owner: Maymead Materials
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Jefferson Asphalt Plant
180 Andy Fowler Rd
Inspection Date: 0612112017
Primary Inspector: Paul Williams
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 11:OOAM
Certification:
Jefferson NC 28640
Phone:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:40AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit, NCG 160015 Owner - Facility: Maymead Materials
Inspection Date: 06l21l2017 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason For Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary
Page: 2

. I ?
permit: NCG160015 Owner - Facility: Maymead Matenais
Inspection Date: 06/21/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Vlatt: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Employee training document was signed and dated June 20, 2016.
Qualitative Monitoring Yea No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ N ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring was not completed for this inspection cycle and was noted not to have
been during the prior inspection on July 22, 2015.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ N ❑
Comment: This site is not required to conduct analytical monitoring since their stormwater is controlled by a
retention pond that does not discharge offsite.
Permit and Outfalls Yea No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Facility maintains an onsite rain gauge.
Page: 3

Ah
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 24, 2015
Jay O'Brien
Mountain City Office
1995 Roan Creek Road
Mountain City, TN 37683
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG160000
Certificate of.Coverage NCG160015
Jefferson Asphalt Plant
180 Andy Fowler Road
Ashe County
Dear Mr. OBrien:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Sue White and Glen White of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources (DEMLR) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection at the subject facility on July 22,
2015. An inspection checklist is attached for your records and the inspection findings are summarized
below.
1 Permit
This facility holds General Storm water Permit No. NCG160015 to discharge Storm water from activities
associated with Asphalt Paving Mixtures and Blocks under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES). The permit became effective October 1, 2014 and expires September 30, 2019. Your
permit renewal package must be received in the Central Office in Raleigh no later than 180 days prior to the
expiration date of the permit.
2. Records/Reports
Part II, Section A of the permit requires the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP).
The plan must include all nine (9) subsections of Part II, Section A of the permit. No SPPP was available for
review at the time of inspection. Qualitative monitoring is required to be completed and documented
twice yearly as defined in Part II, Section C of the permit. Qualitative monitoring does not appear to have
been performed and no records of monitoring were available for review at the time of inspection. The
SPPP plan must be updated annually and qualitative monitoring must be conducted and properly
documented semi-annually to regain compliance with the permit.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Energy Section • Geological Survey Section - Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612.919 707-92001 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: http://Poaal,ncdenr.org/webllr/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

3. Facility Site Review
This site manufactures asphalt paving mixtures. it appeared to.be in good condition and appeared to meet
the physical requirements of the permit. No representative of Maymead was available to walk the site with
the inspectors at the time of inspection. A Maymead employee searched but was notable to locate the
SPPP and records of qualitative monitoring for the retention pond.
4. Effluent/Receiving Waters
Stormwater from the site drains into a retention pond that does not discharge to offsite property.
5. Self -Monitoring Program
Analytical Monitoring: This site is not required to provide analytical monitoring since industrial stormwater
is controlled by a retention pond that does not discharge and no vehicle maintenance is being performed
onsite. If operating procedures for the facility or permit requirements change, analytical monitoring may
be required immediately.
6. Qualitative Monitoring: All qualitative records do not need to be submitted to DEMLR, however, the
records roust be kept on file at the facility for a period of five years. Begin monitoring twice yearly as
required for permit compliance.
This site has discrepancies with permit requirements that must be addressed immediately.
a. Provide an updated SPPP (Stormwater Prevention Protection Plan) that meets Part II, section A of
the permit. Update the SPPP yearly for permit compliance.
b. Provide Qualitative monitoring twice yearly as per Part ll, section C.
c. Provide an updated copy of the permit.
d. A copy of the updated SPPP, the permit and the qualitative monitoring records must be kept on site
for review and inspection. A copy of all of the mentioned documents should be kept in a 3-ring
binder..
e. Site ownership has changed since the original permit was issued. Please complete a "Name or
Ownership Change" document.* The document can be found at the following link:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Irinpdes-stormwater#tab-2
If you have any questions concerning this letter or the attached inspection report, please contact Sue White
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Checklist
CC. Division of Land Quality — WSRO

Permit: NCG160015
SOC:
County: Ashe
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Scott Ross
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance inspection Report
Effective: 10/02/14 Expiration: 09/30/19 owner: Cardinal Quarries LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Jefferson Aspha{t Plant
180 Andy Fowler Rd
Inspection Date: 07/22/2015
Primary Inspector: Sue White
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 10:30AM
Certification:
Jefferson NC 28640
Phone:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11700AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NOG160015 Owner - Facility: Cardinal Quarries LLC
Inspection Date: 07/22/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary
This property is industrial asphalt plant. The property has changed ownership since it was originally permitted under the
name Jefferson Asphalt Plant with Cardinal Quarries as the Owner. The plant is now owned by Maymead.
The current owner had no NPDES records, no copy of the SPPP plan, no qualitative monitoring records and no copy of the
permit onsite. This permit is currently active and fees have been paid annually.
Please provide an updated Stormwater prevention plan and qualitative monitoring done at the retention pond semi-annually.
Provide a copy of the updated permit. The plan, monitoring records and the siteplan should be kept in a three ring bidder
located onsite.
Page: 2

Permit: NCGI60015 Owner - Facility: Cardinal Quarries LLC
Inspection Date: 0712212015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yea No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ E ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a eMP summary?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ®❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ®❑ ❑
Comment: No industrial Stormwater SPPP plan located onsite. Coov of the plan must be updated annual)
and a copy of the plan must be located onsite.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ®❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring of the retention Dond does not aooear to be done twice annuallv as the
permit re uires. No clualitative monitoring records were found onsite.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? O ®❑ ❑
# Were all outfalts observed during the inspection? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfali status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ E ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: No copy of the permit or coverage onsite.
Page: 3

Permit: NCG160015
SOC:
County: Ashe
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Scott Ross
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/02/14 Expiration: 09/30119 owner : Cardinal (quarries LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Jefferson Asphalt Plant
190 Andy Fowler Rd
Inspection Date: 06/2112017
Primary Inspector: Paul Williams
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
EntryTime: 11:ODAM
Certification:
Jefferson NC 28640
Phone:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:40AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine t ispection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge CQC
Facility Status: E3 Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NOG160015 Owner - Facility: Cardinal Quarries LLC
Inspection Date: 06121 /2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Vlsit Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

permit: NCGIGOO15 Owner - Facility: Cardinal Quarries LLC
Inspection Date: 0812112017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yts No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ [] ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
U ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parly(s)?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Employee training document was signed and dated June 20, 2016.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? Cl 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative monitorina was not oomDleted for this inspection cycle and was noted not to have
been during the prior inspection on July 22, 2015,
Analytical Monitoring Yea -No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ E ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: This site is not reauired to conduct analytical monitorina since their stormwater is controlled by a
retention pond that does not discharge offsite.
Permit and Outfalls
— Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalts observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ N ❑
Comment: Facility maintains an onsite rain gauge.
Page: 3

j
2.0 Site History and Source Characterization
This CSA documents investigative activities conducted by Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) at the
former NC DOT asphalt testing laboratory site No. 73 located off North Carolina Highway 16
North in the Crumpler area of Jefferson, Ashe County, North Carolina. A site location map is
provided as Figure 1. The property is owned by James R. Vannoy & Sons Construction
Company, Inc. The asphalt plant was opened in 1972 and remains an active asphalt production
plant. The plant is currently operated as the BME Asphalt Plant (Figure 2). The former NC
DOT asphalt testing laboratory may have used chlorinated solvents including carbon
tetrachloride (CTC), TCE, and 1,1,1- TCA in batch testing of asphalt. This report was prepared
on behalf of NC DOT.
Although impacts were not indicated in a 1989 NC DOT screening study, assessment activities
conducted by Simons & Associates (S&A) in August 2003 indicated the presence of chlorinated
solvents and their degradation products in site ground water. Potential NC DOT target
compounds include CTC, TCE, l,l,l-TCA, and their daughter products.
S&A installed and sampled three monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-3) and sampled the on -
site water supply well (WSW-1) in August 2003. The monitoring wells included two cross -
gradient and one upgradient of the suspected source area. The on -site water supply well is
located approximately 130 ft cross -gradient of the suspected source area. Trace levels of
chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, 1,1-DCE, and
methylene chloride were detected in ground water. The only compound detected above ground
water standards was methylene chloride in monitoring well MW -2. Methylene chloride is a
potential biodegradation product of CTC. Methylene chloride was detected at a concentration of
10.8 µg/1 compared to the ground water standard of 5 µg/l. Although trace levels of 1,1,1-TCA
and TCE were detected in the on -site water supply well, the detections did not exceed ground
r
} water standards.
3
s.lrrnsur SIcsL�.u.mvia projats'nc dofldot-]0'_ je icrsonticsa'reportua .doc
.Hart & Hickman, PC
i

_ram f�rr^ c_ . -° � 1" . ' f�!�/ Q%�� �'-'' > � � ��� �_`_�_ :�• ..+ •'�i � k �
f � �1.r i 7r.' i '���r./•r//1� /��� •' ^ { �j� • O3Yf.r.i�k _1 f . if �'•.�. �
r 1 Irk• f � t j '/ �It Z-
j
_�r7,� �(.l /���"v\��" � �, l � �_l, � J:,�'• �' R •1_`�[�2er,4 ,J i y.�� ,r�J�!> !%:ir` r ;,'... � ,.,wJ •`.; ✓frt` ,.:,
'firi/ `�����i '`% ��_�� ��, •�• ..S `�rtr [j`rl :�)i �t !ry•- !'fJ rl r ,\`-''. _
�s/�,.7i�rff ��, 1 ' _ �-'� �. � `` L,��•...� � (,tt}}���r.: 1! y��. "',.� �`�JfJ (J/ �`�� S ��i=�," I\. ��� t\. J� "
jr 7�!-���ri r rj �`i•_ ( •i � .tl-ii\�� � �/1 i{{/4!i •��/f•• ijf f,([1�!(�3a`'S�t ,,1ti: l.�y� � �i'y, ��'
' '- ���' �if`` r � �4 �' L:.\ �"'i\'\. � 1 'I i t J� :��.•-.• �: �r l � �� � "r ,ram t> r � Ste' •^
%•' ;.-r .� `'� rtlL%'- � . i�:-:.,�� .� ;-.�.:' � - I' .'� .�1'ti?1 .�.,t .•- ,._i y`' �.J,i ,r �, y
s` ../RAI!;rf�r.�'= _r�_..i ��-. 1lf•` \t l
^! " _ .l'f n �. �s� :...�"� J \ _ f•t..l'i y • _ - ~Vic.. _ '�-`� - - `1 N
'`' \ 1• . ;' 1 �: `_ \'�:_%'1ry j� �, -`_ •\� r`•'J�zz`1177� �_� r /! r •r •_�
" t r � � 4 c �[� \•• ^r� I . • . `� r' `/ r � -
�' .�.." ^•'..� �`.� } • 1 ! �.• � ��y iy `�� - I, -�J, �+ ( ^/% ~1 ',r, � � • / -�\'t 'mil.
a-
f !!i ' = j _ �' ;r ! Jam, { r N y'Tµii!
�jji
%ei 1� j�/ = i :< 4J t • \ ''�W�3 ' i).... -b - ----
'r~� '�-_-_•. '1 + `/ .-. 1 ` *ivy'.. '.-.. .�j� VY0![• � .R A ;'i t'�.
- �\ •,' �'. •..'". '' - i ; � ��'�: .• i;' .,. � :ankh % '7" - � - it � r.�_.'t•^ _ rr_
_ ` �N'¢hroea.. }IE,ntE.r• ti;• '\`! •! �' :r�ylsSITE
Ir �� — 'Ts-° �_ � r.^..`_�`
_.liai :.)..J]�tl r+. �' .. _. •sue'✓��9/" '.•• ._. _ \' � •� `" f� ' - '_ 'f �_t. '[jN ''� -
v _ %.� '5
- \ `r ry -• ter., .' . '
APPROXIMATE
0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
JEFFERSON, NC 1968
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTP SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TFTLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT FORMER NC DOT SITE NO.73
JEFFERSON, NORTH CAROLINA
AW, & Hr ckma z9Z saulh T'r�oft steer-sww IUD
Charlotte. North Carolina 2M3
, A o o •E s s �a..a� �o o 000�,rzk. 70 -5864M (p) 704-M"370 ( f)
DATE: B-23-04 REVISION NO: 0
JOB NO: DOT-102 FIGURE NO: 1

RESIDENTIAL
�P �� Q • ���"'"ram
&W LOG HOMES
fi
CR ROB
A14 WL
DUST
SUPPRESSION
GRAVEL PONDS
PILE
WSW-2
GRAVEL
'p PILE
�p - VRmrr; .
WSW-3 IF TESTING
LAB
PETROLEUM SEDIMENT
WOODED LIST lip POND
AREA GRAVEL BASIN
SINS
GRAVEL STORAGE
PILE SHED MW DO MW-11
WOODED
AREA
WSW-4
WSW— I I
sP
WSW-12
WSW—
MW-4
A.
GRAVEL DW-1 MW_2
SEPTIC
MW-6 SYSTEM
WSW-5 AREA
WSW-1 S
STORAGE
WOODED DIESEL SHED
AREA L 1UASET
MW-7
FIELD
Mw_8

ANUT VUYVLER ROAD
■
GRAVEL PILE
FORMER TESTING
LAB
PEIROLFUM
UST BASIN
AsA
C-PAVEL DIPJS I`.1W i
9 2 42.74)
GRAVEL DUST
61
SUPPRESSION
PILE
PONDS
SUBJECT., PROPERTY BOUNDARY
'A
STREAM
SHALLOWk4ON ITORING,,;WELL
Q
DEEP ER. MONft6�1�C('_
•
wWELLk
ACTIVE
(2.930.91)
AT'ER �ELEvATION (ft)
(JUNK
9.1120,04)
•
ESTIMATE6fR'OUND,'g WATER
_f(f
CONTOUR 4
ESTI1r1A"TE'6_­
gGROUN6FWA_TER -FLOW
SEDIMENT POND
WOODED AREA
— _ k \', I — ;r
qP10 _/
..
(2.937.72) lkl,
13 _11�. ow— I SEPTIC SYSTEM
;,-
W000Ff) AREA
DIESEL PUEL
A<T
MW-7
ti
(2,927-51)
V.
Xx
MW_ I
(2,933.4
100,
oe
10,
4
AREA
STORAGE
SHEY
MW-8
(2,919-28)
0i
N
C co
OIV
(v
L%,IjwrlAll, 07
eZe
, J
. 4k
0
e_. inn
SCALt'it-nim
ESTIMATED SHALLOW :GROUND 'WATER
POTENTIOMETRIP',tURFACE
FORMER NC��'DOT-JU
SIT V
NO.
JEFFERSON,��'J'NO
DATE: B-23-04
JOB NO: DOT-102"-­7o;
t-1

I
A
2,990
2 980
2.970
2.940
y
•�
2.910
2.900
2.890
2..A80- .
!` � � �. � �� ♦ ♦'! %
/ / % r •X
2,971)
r 1 /'v' r `•r f •J /`i \r f ( / Ai •/
of Il - `RYA '/ ,r % \! /'\.� �l J !_ F `•/` r 1
' - '. ter• \- \ \•'\ � 1 )'\ �'' '?\I)
I
LOCATION OF
DIESEL FUEL
M AST
A}
I
d
� �
+ '
3,000
,. ..:
2,990
i-2.980
�.
2.970
' ' • r
' _
2,950
jr
21950
—2.940
y'
2,930
1,100
�•
�
-1. �..
�[
� 25
2,920
63
2,910
2,900
2.890
21880
2,870
2.860
2.850
2,540
A
LEGEND 'a
'
SANDY SILT AND SILTY
f'•' %=•
FINE SAND
PARTIALLY WEATHERED
BEDROCK (PWR)
BEDROCK
ESTIMATED 200 pg/I 1,1,1-T
i ISOCONCENTRATION
_1200- (DECEMBER 2003)
GROUND WATER 1,1,1-TCA 1
200 CONCENTRATION (DECEMBEF
2003 AND MAY 2004) 11
I ESTIMATED SHALLOW
TABLE (TUNE 9, 2004)
SURFACE CASING
WELL CASING
+ WELL SCREEN
APPROxfmATE
0 40 80
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
APPROXIMATE
0 20 40
VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET
GENERALIZED CROSS --SECTION A
FORMER NC DOT SITE NO. 73
JEFFERSON, NORTH CAROLINA_ .:.
w
ut & Mckman Char South Tryon Suee:S
Chutorte, North CuoGna Taxc
tmtc
)ftw'„ CFEtt•00ML Ccwwmwrwr 7"M&OWII(p) XtS%6 !7373
DATE: 10--8-04 REVISION N0. 0 w`
JOB NO: DOT--102 FIGURE NO. 5

ti
OJIDAS ��hfC/�C�IG� WC, /b Ook Rodt
.5-vo- a 36 6
l0 b g4 � Fj,,j6� fov(lr � SAL