NCG120070_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20170628

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
P' HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ �;OL� OCe a $
YYYYMMDD

oiiiiiiiiiR
&JLJ Ar Ar
EF1%,Jt:3INEERIIVG
June 28, 2017
Ms. Melissa J. King, PE
Assistant Regional Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Land Quality Section
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Stormwater Compliance Inspection Report
Woodruff Landfill - Transylvania County
Rosman, North Carolina
JOYCE Project No. 336.1701.11 Task 3
Dear Ms. King:
9731-F Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
www.JoyceEngineering.com
Received
jUN 3 0 2017
Land Quality Section
Asheville
In response to your stormwater compliance inspection of the Woodruff landfill facility on
October 13, 2016, and on behalf of Transylvania County, Joyce Engineering (JOYCE) submitted
a corrective action plan dated January 13, 2017 for the Land Quality Section (LQS) review and
approval. Subsequently in our correspondence with you, we understand that the corrective action
plan was adequately designed in accordance with NC rules, however additional remedies are
required to slow down runoff and stop sediments from reaching the Woodruff Branch. We have
incorporated to the January submitted E&SC Plan Drawing No. ES-017t-wo additional slope drains
for the landfill, rock check dams along the south -side road Swale, and a p-roposed'-diversion_berm4
Jo direct water-to-a_proppsedLforebay. The forbeay holds sediments before runoff reaches the
sediment basin. The County staff can clean the forebay frequently, which will diminish the risk
of sediments discharge to the Woodruff Branch.
If these proposed additions to the E&SC Plan are approved by the LQS, please replace the
revised Drawing No. E&SC-01 to the January 13, 2017 report. Once approved. the County will
proceed with the construction of the corrective plan.
If you have any questions about this corrective action plan, please do not hesitate to give
me a call at [phone].
Sincerely,
JrCE EN INEERING, INC.
Hannu Kemppine , 'rfG
Senior Project Consultant
Attachments:
Revised E&S Control Drawing (Drawing No. ES-01)
C: David McNeill, Operations Manager, Transylvania County

Woodruff Landfill -Transylvania County
Resubmittal
Comments:
Proposed Slope drains.
1. Show on the plans the calculations for the required pipe size according to Section 6.32 of the
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. 15A NCAC 04B .0108
2. Show on the plans the size and material of the pipe to be used. G.S. 113A-57 paragraph (3).
Proposed Rock Check Dams.
1. Are the rock check dams shown in the typical section in accordance with Section 6.83 of the
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual? G.S. 113A-57 paragraph (3).
Proposed Diversion Berm.
1. Give the dimensions of the proposed diversion berm on the plans. G.S. 113A-57 paragraph (3).
- 1194 , ;', /A

rr j �r
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ENGINEERING, INC
To: Melissa King, P.E. From: Hannu Kemppinen
NCDEQ — LQS 2211 West Meadowview Road, Suite 101
Asheville Regional office Greensboro, North Carolina 27407
2090 US HWY 70 Phone: [phone]
Swannanoa, NC 28788 Fax: [phone]
Re: SWS # 88-07 E&S Corrective Actions Date: 6/29/2017
JEI Project # : 336.1701.11
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Task # : 03
® Attached ❑ Under Separate cover via
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ® Report
❑ Other.
_ the following item(s):
❑ samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Opinion of Cost ❑ Permit Amendment/Application
Copies
Date
No.
Description ReceW
1
6/28/2017
1
E&S Corrective Action Plan Revision -
jUN
Land Quality
F
ed
2017
ection
TRANSMITTED as checked bellow—
® For Approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for review
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
® As Requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected copies
❑ For Review and comment ❑ Other:
• Comments:
In response to your comment, the attached is a hard copy of the electronically submitted report dated
6/28/2017.
David McNeill (electronic)
114

Lr
AIX
ay�:
zz:i
V )°
Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
November 4, 2016
Transylvania County Solid Waste Department
ATTN: Mr. Jeff Berkshire
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
SUBJECT: NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Transylvania County MSW Landfill
Permit No: NCG120070
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Berkshire:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on October 13, 2016,
The facility was found to be in non-compliance with permit NCG 120070.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations and comments for
your reference. The following items must be addressed on or before March 31 2017:
I . An approvable Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, specific to the site, must be developed. Recall the
EPA has a template on its website that might be of use;
2. Significant spills occurring during the past three years.must be documented and available for review. At the
time of the inspection, information concerning a leachate truck spill of about 4000 gallons was mentioned but
had not been documented;
3. Employee training must be conducted and documented for review;
4. Qualitative and analytical monitoring requirements must be followed and documented. The last recorded
sampling was completed in 2015. While a recent visual monitoring had been conducted, it had not been
documented ; and,
5. All outfalls should be reviewed to determine which ones accurately reflect stormwater discharges at the site.
If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at [phone],
Sincerely,
-ry�"L--Y /6T�t
Melissa J. King, PE
Assistant Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
State of Ncrth Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
2090 US 70 f{ighway I Swannanoa, NC 28779.8211
828 296 4500 T

IV C`4� r2- 007-D
Facility: %;~ar5. �p, >�,�'i�l >7 j/
Date:
IP i3ln,
Location Address: 5pn ,�/f /�, U;,�, zi
COC#:
Contact Name: cle_AT 15-t1--5 ire
Phone#:
yo,��
Contact Mailing Address: AbE ve_
County:
a�5 %y nfct
Directions:
Routine Compliance Inspection
Rescission Request
Complaint Investigation
Other - Explain:
A
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No N/A Comments
1
Is a copy of the permit and the Certificate of Coverage available
7t t ko CltP7
2 Is a copy of the signed and certified SWPPP at the facility?
B Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
4 Does the plan include a general location (USGS) map?
S Does the plan include a detailed site map including outfall
locations and drainage areas?
6 Does the plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan?
(SPRP)
7 Does the plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good
Housekeeoiniz Plan? A5 P,, i it i-ca : ,
B
Does the plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Does the Plan include a BMP Summary?
Does the plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
Has the SWPPP been implemented?
Monitoring and Records % r.s Gp fc P a JAf
Does the plan include a list of significant spi occurring during
Yes No N/A re—c_o c p �� s
9
10
11.
B
1
the past 3 years? oy� ec..c 07 [ e_,•
4C f
f—IT
2
Does the facility provide and document employee training?�,;-ifs
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? (semi-
L
I
3
annual) yx/;Sua i1�t7�r tCorm
Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring?
4
Is the facility meeting all permit specified benchmark goals?
1012-31ig
6
Is the facility following the tiered response? #14,_
7
Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring from vehicle
cU7 Co
Maintenance areas?
Waste Management
Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment-?
Yes No N/A
C
_77A-s_ e.a6/&0_> -A-1 /�na�i
Are current BMPs in material storage areas adequate?
2
&�2 ,fl9 e �lrc-e-V2 0-4 ._ CJ
'W EJOCf ! LL fC 6,- h-A -
L t 4'e-
( -f� (7...I-
_.—

�i
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
December 4, 2012
Transylvania County
21 E Main St
Brevard, NC 28712
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Transylvania County Landfill
COC Number NCG120070
Transylvania County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under stormwater General Permit NCG120000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit. This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated October
15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCG120000
• A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater, and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls, management, monitoring, and record keeping. Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit. Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect all new permit requirements.
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013. Your facility must sample a "measureable
storm event" beginning during the periods beginning January 1 and July 1 of every year (or, if applicable,
report "No Flow," as outlined in Part III, Section E). Also, please note that Tier 3 Actions in Part 11 of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances.
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (http:/Jt)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/current-
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit. Please visit
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/wslsu/npdessw (click on `General Permits' tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone]
Intemet: www ncwale uali .o
An Equal Op,c,.anityiAfi:!nalivektionEm,4 rer
Noi thCarol ilia
Natltral�-�

5
1 I
f�ecember 4, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include:
• Part II:
• Section A: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section, if applicable, has been updated
to the most current language of our permits. Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the SPPP requirements in some cases.
• Sections B, C: Failure to perform analytical stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme.
• Sections B, C: A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/I for HOW, ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters.
• Sections B, C: The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas, and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements.
• Sections B, C, D: inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP, or in
separate on -site records if your General Permit does not require an SPPP. Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit.
• Sections B, C: The term "Representative Storm Event" has been replaced by "Measurable Storm
Event." A measurable storm event is defined in the permit.
• Section D: If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring, DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action.
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit,
including Compliance and Liability, Reporting, Monitoring and Records requirements; Operation and
Maintenance obligations; and Definitions. Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website above. DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory. Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division.
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ. This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law,
rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree. If you have any questions regarding this permit
package, please contact the Division's Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone].
Sincerely,,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Asheville Regional Office

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG120000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG120070
STORM WATER
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Transylvania County
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at:
Transylvania County Landfill
500 Howell Rd
Brevard
Transylvania County
to receiving waters designated as Woodruff Branch, a class C;Tr waterbody in the French
Broad River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and
other conditions set forth in Parts I, 11, 11I, and IV of General Permit No. NCG120000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this 4t4 day of December, 2012.
for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

O�O� W A �QQG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
t/1 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 31, 2003
Will Sagar
Transylvania County
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
Subject: NPDES COC # NCG120070
Transylvania County Landfill
Compliance Schedule Correction
Transylvania
Dear Will Sagar:
It recently came to the Division's attention that the compliance schedule in the NCG120000 permit is
incorrect. The compliance refers to requiring a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan which is not a
requirement of this permit. The corrected compliance language that should go under Part III, Section A: L is
shown below. We have also attached a new page reflecting this change for your permit file (Part III page I of
11). This new page should replace the current page in your permit.
SECTION A: COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
1. Compliance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with the permit in accordance with the following schedule:
Existing Facilities: Upon the effective date of the Certificate of Coverage the permittee shall comply
with all of the conditions detailed in Part H, Section A: Final Limitations and Controls for Stormwater
Discharges.
New Facilities: Upon the beginning of discharges from the operation of the industrial activity the
permittee shall comply with all conditions detailed in Part H, Section A: Final Limitations and Controls
for Stormwater Discharges.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact Aisha Lau at
[phone], ext. 578.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED By
BRADLEY BENNETT
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Asheville Regional Office
Central Files
©fin
NCDENR
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
1 800 623-7748

ANA r1l L E C C'A
NCQENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
January 13, 2012
Jeff Brookshire
Transylvania County
500 Howell Rd
Brevard NC 28712
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
SUBJECT: NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Transylvania County Landfill
NOV-2011-PC-0089
Incident Closure
Permit No: NCG 120070
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Brookshire:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has received the response from Joyce Engineering,
related to the Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement NOV-2011-PC-0089.
DWQ has reviewed the information provided and conducted a follow-up site visit on December
19, 2011. The written response and the landfill's analytical results observed at the site have
satisfactorily resolved the violations noted in the subject Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement.
This letter in no way precludes this Office for taking action on this or any other violation.
Violations are subject to civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains important observations
and comments for your reference.
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Location: 2090 U.S. Hghway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Enternet www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
naturally

Page Two
Transylvania County Landfill
January 13, 2012
Please contact me at [phone] or linda.wiggs2ncdenngov, if I can be of any further
assistance.
Sincerely,
Linda Wiggs
Environmental Special
Surface Water Protecti
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Asheville Files
DWM-ARO
DLR-ARO
Transylvania County i
DWM-Ervin Lane (e-
Joyce Engineering -HE
SAS

Permit: NGG120070
SOC:
County: Transylvania
Region: Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Transylvania County
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Transylvania County Landfill
500 Howell Rd
Contact Person: Jeff Brookshire
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 12/19/2011 Entry Time: 01:30 PM
Primary inspector: Linda S Wiggs
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
. Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Brevard NC 28712
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 03:10 PM
Phone: [phone]
Ext.4653
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: MCG120070 Owner - Facility: Transylvania County
Inspection Date: 12/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
Present during inspection were Jeff Brookshire and Pete Stamey with Transylvania County Landfill as well as myself,
Kevin Barnett and Jean Conway with Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
The Transylvania County Landfill was under a Notice of Violation with DWQ during 2011 and was required to perform
additional monitoring of their outfall #1 and the receiving stream above and below this outfall. The landfill also had to
make improvements to the erosion control structures and conveyances.
The landfill is located at the headwaters of Woodruff Branch. The headwater tributaries have -historically -been -altered -by
instream basins. These tribs are also impacted by a road system. Finally the one tributary originates at the toe of an old
cell. The best option for these impacts is maintenance management. The landfill management has installed a trap above
the one tributary to assist in controlling the sediment load from the office/workshop area. The ditchlineslstormwater
conveyances of the road system in this headwater tributary area have been improved. There is still some rock
stabilization needed along this conveyance system that the management will address. It is important to note that this
area will require high maintenance to avoid further stream impacts. The main goal of the road system and ditchline
maintenance is to keep the sediment load to these basins to a minimal. If the basin load can be kept to a minimum and
the basins establish wetland plants that could be beneficial as well. Inspection of this area weekly and following every
0.05 inch of rain is required and will be an essential management tool. When these inspections reveal repairs are
needed, the repairs should take place within 24 hours or prior to the next rain event.
Monthly analytical data submitted to DWQ from the landfill indicated the occasional elevated suspended solids, COD and
bacteria levels in Woodruff Branch. The most feasible means at this point to avoid elevated parameters in Woodruff
Branch is excellent maintenance as noted above. Facility can go back to semi-annual sampling.
A study was performed by the DWQ Environmental Sciences Branch at the mouth of Woodruff Branch to evaluate this
watersheds benthic community for impacts from the landfill. The results of this study indicate the lower reach of Woodruff
Branch is not impacted by the landfill.
The primary treatment basin still needs the berm created in it to avoid short circuiting the influent flows to the outfall
structure. This berm will cause water to flow around it creating more treatment time. Facility is creating berm as materials
come available. Another improvement made at the facility was rock stabilization at the inlet to the basin area which is
located the toe of active cell. Again this will require constant maintenance and the same inspection and repair regime as
noted above will be necessary in this area.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG120070 Owner - Facility: Transylvania County
Inspection Date: 12/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Follow-up
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
Cl
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including oulfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
B
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
❑
■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: SP3 not required under NCG12. Erosion control measures approved by
DLR per DWQ request were installed. See summary.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Comment: Facility has performed most of the monthly monitoring required by DWQ
per NOV. Facility is allowed to go back to semi-annual sampling of outfalls.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
Cl ❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Page: 3

L
Permit: NCG120070 Owner • Facility: Transylvania County
Inspection Date: 12/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Comment: All outfalls and conveyances were observed. See summary
Page. 4

Wi99s, Linda
From: Jeff Brookshire [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: Lee
Hey Linda,
I was on vacation last week so sorry for the delayed reply.
We held up well during Lee. The rain was not intense and even though we had 4.68 inches it did not cause problems.
We had been quite dry before that so we did not have a big hit on our leachate production.
took water samples on September 7 and the results were:
#1
#2
#3
TSS 13
138.7
67.7
FC >600
>600
>600
COD 28
ND
76
The lab technician at Brevard said that it was not unusual to see high fecal readings after such a long dry spell.
Hope things are well with you. Did you go to Brewgrass?
Jeff
From: Wiggs, Linda[mailto:linda.wiggs@ncdenr,gov_]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 4:25 PM
To:[e-mail]
Subject: Lee
Hi Jeff,
How did things hold up during Lee?
Still waiting on the biologic report, I will let you know when I get it.
Take care, Linda
Linda Wiggs - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Link to Division of Water Quality Home Page
http:/lportal. ncdenr.org/web/wq

0
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
2

Wiggs, Linda
From: Jeff Brookshire [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 3:46 PM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Latest results
July 26 Rainfall 0.46 inches
#1
#2
#3
TSS 149
126
59.5
FC >600
>600
>600
COD 32
ND
ND
Jeff Brookshire
Director Solid Waste
[phone]

Wiggs, Linda
From: .Jeff Brookshire [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:13 PM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: update/timeline
Linda
Here are some results I don't think I've sent you
May 27 0.84 inches
#1
#2
#3
TSS 110
17.5
11
FC 550
350
440
COD 35.0
ND
ND
June 13 1.47 inches of rain
#1
#2
#3
TSS 176
71.5
61.3
FC 530
580
234
COD 34
30
ND
We have rebuilt the ditch line on the loser road and have done some work on the culverts in that area. We have started
putting rocks in the sed basin for thae berm extension. We recently removed silt from the sed ponds. We have
hydroseeded lots of the area in phase 4.
So we have made lots of progress but we are still working on some more of the modifications in the E & S plan.
took water samples on July 25 but I have not gotten the results yet.
Hope things are well with you.
Jeff
From: Wiggs, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:05 AM
To: Jeff.Brookshire(atransylvaniacounty.org
Subject: update/timeline
Hi Jeff,
FYI from my end, it will likely be the end of August or beginning of September before I get the results from the Biologic
Unit in Raleigh about the aquatic health of Woodruff Branch. They have completed their sampling but need to work up
the results.
i wanted to get you to send me your latest sample results and check on the timeline or status of repairs.
Thanks Linda
Linda Wiggs - Linda.Wiggs2ncdenr.gov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office

Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Link to Division of Water Quality Home Page
http://Dortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed -to third -parties.

!e:'s _,- tip' .- �i:'c:[".'- �•.L. ... ,. i� �lix. .'ar (�t7:,
MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
Project Name: Transylvania County Landfill - Phase 5
Project ID: TRANS-2007-014
County: Transylvania
Reviewed By: Charles Koontz
1. The revised plan submitted to stabilize ditch lines along the access road to sediment
basin #1 appears to address erosion of these areas as discussed onsite on 3/2/2011.
However, additional erosion control measures were requested for the area at the creek
crossing. This was not addressed in the submitted plans. There are two pipes under
the access road. The fill of the road above the inlet and outlet of the pipe is too steep
and is sliding into the creek channel. Also, the outlet pipe for sediment basin #1 was
moved to a location that is different from the location shown on the original plans.
Submit revised plans for stabilizing the fill over the culverts under the access road and
the relocation and erosion control measures associated with the outlet pipe for
sediment basin #1.

CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL
L<�Z a1AM Imo,
The posting of this certificate certifies that an erosion and sedimentation control plan has been
approved for this project by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 113A — 57 (4) and 1.13A -- 54 (d) (4) and
North Carolina Administrative Code,. Title 15A, Chapter 413.0107 (c). This certificate must be
posted at the primary entrance of the job site before construction begins and until establishment of
permanent groundcover as required by North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter
4B.0127 (b).
Phase 5 Expansion - Transylvania
County Landrill
Project Name and Location
June 89 2011
Date of Plan Approval
Transvivania
TRANS-2007-014
e ional Engineer
� g
.J

Wiggs, Linda
From: Jeff Brookshire [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 2:20 PM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Cc: 'Jeremey Keriy'
Linda
More test results
4/18 COD results
#1
#2
ND
37mg/I
5/4 RAIN EVENT 0.79
INCHES OF RAIN
#1
#2
TSS 12.3
34.6
FC 46
86
COD ND
ND
#3
ND
We had a rain event on 5/12 (1.02) but the Brevard lab was unable to take our samples that day. We will be sure to
take samples the next time it rains.
Jeff Brookshire
Director Solid Waste
[phone]
I

Wiggs, Linda
From:
Jeff Brookshire [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Friday, May 06, 2011 10:35 AM
To:
Wiggs, Linda
Cc:
'Jeremey Kerly'
Subject:
water results
Linda
More water results
4/12 rain event
COD results All three sample points were ND's
4/18 rain event 5.35 inches of rain.
#1 #2 #3
TSS 8.3 87.3 61
FC 56 320 260
Will send more when I get them.
Jeff Brookshire
Director Solid Waste
[phone]
a't%y&:Ic0
1

1 M
ENGINEERING, INC
March 7, 2011
Ms. Linda Wiggs
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US HWY 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for. Enforcement
Woodruff Landfill
NPDES General Stormwater Permit—NCG120000
COC#NCG 120070
Transylvania County
Response Due Date: March 31, 2011
Dear Linda,
Waste Industry Experts
Joyce Engineering, Inc.
2211 West Meadowview Rd
Suite 101
Greensboro, NC 27407
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
www.JoyceEngineering.com
This letter is in follow-up to the March 2, 2011 meeting with representatives of the DENR,
Transylvania County and Joyce Engineering, Inc. concerning NPDES compliance at the Woodruff
landfill. In the meeting those attending were Charles Koontz and Jeff Wait representing Division of
Land Resources, Cathy "Tyndall with you representing Division of Water Quality, Jeff Brookshire and
Ronnie Leonard representing Transylvania County, and Jeremey Kerly with me representing Joyce
Engineering, Inc. The meeting discussions covered all items listed in the February 15, 2011 Notice of
Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement.
In response to the February 15 NOV letter, and behalf of Transylvania County, I am providing
explanation to compliance issues raised as the Permit Violations Part II Section A.2 and A.3 regarding
the sediment basins and the summary of historical surface water constituents. For clarity I have
included the DENR comments below as they appeared in the original NOV in italic font, and our
explanation in Bold font.
Permit Violations
Part II Section A. 2. — Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan deviation.
During the inspection and subsequent file review discrepancies were noted between the approved
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan from Division of Land Resources and the existing conditions;
including Sediment Basin #1 and two in stream (online) basins.
Part II Section A. 3. - Landfill Permit Water Protection Requirements (15R NCAC 13B.1626). The
Division of Waste Management issued a Notice of Violation dated May 26, 2010 far 15A NCAC 13B.
1626 (8)(d). During a file review of the Summary of historical Surface Water Constituents, specifically
SMP-1, required by the Division of Waste Management several Water Quality Standard violations (15A

March 7, 2011
Page 2
NCAC 2B.0200) were noted. These water quality violations are associated with the following
parameters: pH, temperature, toluene, and turbidity.
Re uired Response
Please respond to the following items by March 31, 201 L
Part H Section A. 2. — Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan Deviation.
An inspection of the facility by the Division of Land Resources ,is needed. By copy of this Notice of
Violation the Division of Water Quality is requesting a compliance inspection be performed by the
Division of Land Resources.
During the January 27, 2011 inspection four (4) erosion control basins were noted: two (2) permitted
basins and two (2) online non -permitted basins. Please apply to Division of Land Resources (DLR) if
you plan to maintain basins in the vicinity of the 2 online basins. Note: Online basins are not
permittahle, therefore you need to evaluate this area for acceptable erosion control and explain how
you plan to restore the stream. A Plan Modification submitted to DLR may be needed for Sediment
Basin #1.
Sediment Basin #1, expanded with Phase 5 construction in 2007, was modified due to site
conditions involving bedrock encountered during excavation of the basin. The basin holding
capacity remained as designed for the required 25-year storm event, but the riser barrel and
outlet structure location was altered to accommodate the rock issue. A revised drawing was
included in the Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) report to the Solid Waste Section. The
Permit to Operate Phase 5 was subsequently approved by the Section. Joyce Engineering, Inc.
will revise the drawing of Sediment Basin #1 to include additional sediment control measures to be
constructed within the basin as discussed during the March 2, 2011 site meeting. The revised
drawing will be submitted to the Division of Land Resources.
Two in stream (online) basins were constructed in early 1990s for the Phase 1 and the subsequent
landfill phases were approved for construction and operation with Erosion and Sediment Control
Plans approved for each construction phase and Permit to Operate. The County's understanding
is that the E&S control features were permitted and approved by the Solid Waste Section,
therefore the site has been in compliance past 20 years. Moreover, the March 21, 2006 compliance
evaluation by DWQ was complimentary on the stormwater management at the Woodruff landfill.
In reference to the January 27, 2011 inspection, the online basins were considered not permittahle.
Surface run-off and stormwater conveyance issues were observed and discussed during our site
visit on March 2, 2011. Several ideas were entertained with you and the representatives of Land
Resources. We appreciate your input and recommendations from Mr. Koontz in the effort to
devise acceptable ways of resolving the complex drainage patterns at the site. Transylvania
County has agreed with Joyce Engineering, Inc. to review the site conditions and design
improvements in accordance with the current North Carolina Sediment Control Plan Better
Management Practices. Revisions to the site E&S Plan design will be put forth in March and we
intend to submit the plans to the Division of Land Resource by end of the month. The site does
pose some challenges in how best to capture run-off and where to place a new sediment basin. If
unforeseen difficulties are encountered during the design phase to delay the plans submittal, we
will notify you and Mr. Koontz.
..�. ".n
0 Am1m
ENC;INEERIMt, INC.

March 7, 201.1
Page 3
Part 11 Section A. 3. - Landfill Permit Water Protection Requirements.
The Division of Waste Management issued this Landfill a Notice of Violation dated May 26, 2010 for
15A NCAC 13B. 1626 (8)(d). The NCG120070 permit requires you to be compliant with the Landfill
Permit. Please explain when you plan to be in compliance with Division of 1+aste Management.
Transylvania County and Joyce Engineering, Inc. met with the Solid Waste Section in November
15, 2010 and an agreement was reached to conduct additional sampling of the surface water and
soil related to the alleged leachate release. Repeated water and soil sampling results since May
2010 have proven that there is no contamination of the water or soil related to the alleged leachate
release. The last resampling conducted in December 2010 results were submitted to the Solid
Waste Section in January 2011. The Section has not issued any further comment or investigation.
The County seeks final closure from the DENR to the May 26, 2010 Notice of Violation.
Also, please explain why the Water Quality Standards Violations occurred and, lentil further notice,
initiate monthly Analytical Monitoring of Woodruff Branch for the following parameters: pH,
temperature, and turbidity. These samples shall be taken from Woodruff Branch monthly just
downstream of the confluence of Woodruff Branch and Sediment Basin 91, This sampling shall begin
immediately and sample results shall be submitted to: Division of Water Quality, 2090 HWY 70,
Srvannanoa, NC 28778.
This response addresses only the question to explain why the Water Quality Standards violations
occurred. The Woodruff Branch was classified in 1973 as Trout Waters. 15A NCAC 0213.0211
water quality standards for Trout Waters are for a pH range of 6-9, temperature not to exceed
20°C, and turbidity no higher than 10 NTU. Attached with this letter you will find an attachment
for the historical water quality data of the Woodruff facility.
In our observation there appears to be a 10 year cycle of natural variation in the water pH and
corresponding to variance in temperature at the time of monitoring. Since 1994, the pH of surface
water collected at monitoring point SMP-1 averages 6.25 with a range from 7.88 to 4.80. The
historical average is within the tolerable pH range. In addition, considering Woodruff Branch is a
"gaining" stream, groundwater feeds the Branch as it traverses across the facility. Historically,
groundwater pH onsite averages 5.65, which is below the pH range for Trout Waters. With the
average pH for groundwater below 6, it is not surprising to see lower pH levels in surface water.
In considering that the site in the 1970s was under Forest Service jurisdiction, the Woodruff
Branch run clear and was a babbling brook under heavy forest canopy. At that time the water
temperature likely remained through summers below 200C. Contrasting the conditions with
today landfill development, the tree canopy is missing and the sediment basin is in full sun. The
lack of shading contributes to the occasionally elevated water temperatures. Turbidity value of 10
NTU for trout waters is also difficult to maintain regarding today's conditions. Similarly as in the
case with water pH and temperature, the turbidity measurements will be difficult to keep at 10
following a storm event.
The County does recognize the site does have run-off and sediment issues that need help which the
County plans now to improve with the revisions to the site E&S controls.
ENGINEERING, INC

March 7, 2011
Page 4
In summary, to explain why the water quality violations occurred, the County states that natural
conditions (atmospheric and groundwater) beyond the operators/owners control contribute to the
out of range variations. With this in mind, the water quality parameters are not necessarily a
violation caused by the operations, rather an effect of the site conditions changed since the stream
n.
In the meeting it was suggested that in the future, stream water quality-measurements-should_be
taken further downstream from the confluence of the basin discharge with the Woodruff Branch.
An accessible location was offered to sample further downstream that would be more
representative to the stream water quality than the point where the sampling has be conducted in
past.
On behalf of Transylvania County and Joyce Engineering I appreciate the opportunity to meet
with the Division of Water Quality and Land Quality to discuss the drainage problems at the Woodruff
facility and work together improving the site conditions to meeting the environmental monitoring
requirements. If you have further questions concerning this letter, please contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
JOYCE ENGINEERING, INC.
Hannu Kemppinen, P.G.
Senior Project Consultant
Attachments
C: Charles Koontz and Jeff Wait. Division of Land Resources, NCDENR
Cathy Tyndall, Division of Water Quality, NCDENR
Ervin Lane, Division of Waste Management; NCDENR
Artie Wilson and Jeff Brookshire, Transylvania County
ENGINEEHINQ, INC

t/
Land Quality Section: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Sivannanoa, NC 28778, [phone]
County: Project: Ph f E?c,p.-.kg;or. -
Person financially responsible: [p
Address: --5� Q )- v".J, 11 tQ -)
aVk`!. eo L,,,.l '•�/ River basin:
75C.-�-' -,iYC Project# O7TOJ !�
_4_ Ale Z1k71Z Case#
I. Project location: Lea a ei 1,-P-'67- ,
Pictures: No Yes: ❑ Prints: ❑ Slides: [I Video: [I Digital: [I
2. Weather and soil conditions: 15 O Initial inspection: Yes- 21 No: ❑
3. Is site currently under notice of violation? Yes: No
4. Is the site in compliance with S.P.C.A. and rules? Yes: ❑ N If no, check violations below:
S. Violations:
Fla. No approved plan, G.S. 113A-57 (4) and 15A N.C.A.0 413.0107(c) e"g. Inadequate buffer zone, G.S. l 13A-57(1)
Zb. Failure to follow approved plan, G.S. 113A-57(5) ❑ h. Graded slopes and fills too steep,
❑ c. Failure to submit revised plan, G.S. 113A-54.1(b) and G.S. 113A-57(2) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(d)
15A N.C.A.C. 413.0118(a) ❑ i. Unprotected exposed slopes, G.S. I I3A-57(2)
❑ d. Failure to provide adequate groundcover, G.S. 113A-57(3) and ❑ j. Failure to maintain erosion control measures,
15A N,C.A.C. 4B.0107(b) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(e) 15A N.C.A.C. 413.0113
❑ C. Insufficient measures to retain sediment on site, G.S. 11.3A-57(3) ❑ k. Other (describe)
/%f. Failure to take all reasonable measures, 15A N.C.A.C, 4B.0105
6. Potential NPDES Permit Violation? Yes:: No: ❑ Describe: 0 J If
7. Has sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection? Yes:Z If yes, where? (check all that apply) No: ❑
Lake/natural watercourse on the tract�:X I Lake/natural watercourse othe tract: Eltber property: ❑
Description: ���:rhw NHS w,,5%e-[ ;��o Lr« �-- �-o%^--511T'r
Degree of damage: slight: ❑ moderate : severe : ❑ ``
8. Contact made with (name):
Inspection report given: ❑ or sentX to person financially responsible
9. Corrective actions needed:
r
od
Report by:
Date of inspectio
cc:
�itl ivy t.�
Date given/sent! -3ks i
l Others present: Z-, % 3 s e
Time arriving on site: % % • _ Time leavi site:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
February 15, 2011
Jeff Brookshire
Transylvania County Landfill
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Transylvania County Landfill
NPDES General Stormwater Permit — NCG120000
COC#NCG 120070
Transylvania County
Response Due Date: March 31, 2011
Dear Mr. Brookshire:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
This letter is in follow-up to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit
NCG120000 (NCG120070) compliance inspection conducted on January 27, 2011. Present during the
inspection were Kevin Barnett with Division of Water Quality, as well as yourself, Vicki Guy, and Pete Stamey
with the Transylvania County Landfill. The facility was found to be in violation of permit NCG120070.
Permit Violations
Part II Section A. 2. — Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan deviation.
During the inspection and subsequent file review discrepancies were noted between the approved Sedimentation
and Erosion Control Plan from Division of Land Resources and the existing conditions; including Sediment
Basin #1 and two instream (online) basins.
Part II Section A. 3. - Landfill Permit Water Protection Requirements (15A NCAC 13B.1626). The Division
of Waste Management issued a Notice of Violation dated May 26, 2010 for 15A NCAC 13B. 1626 (8)(d).
During a file review of the Summary of Historical Surface Water Cbnstituents, specifically SMP-I, required by
the Division of Waste Management several Water Quality Standard violations (15A NCAC 2B.0200) were
noted. These water quality violations are associated with the following parameters: pH, temperature, toluene,
and turbidity.
Location: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Sery m 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.newaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Awurally

Transylvania County Landfill
February 15g, 2011
Page 2 of 3
3r r 3 +R
Permit Violations (Continued)
Part II Section B - Analytical Monitoring Requirements.
Analytical monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements. The
Division of Water Quality inspection performed in March 2006 informed the County of the Analytical
Monitoring requirements.
Part 11 Section C - Qualitative Monitoring Requirements.
Qualitative monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements. The
Division -of -Water Quality -inspection - performed -in -March 2006-informed-the-County-of the -Qualitative
Monitoring requirements.
Part III Section A.2. - Duty to Comply.
The aforementioned permit violations indicate your failure to comply with the NCG 120070 permit.
Please Note
The March 2006 inspection mentioned above also commented on Secondary Containment at the Transylvania
County Landfill. During the January 2011 inspection, the Division of Water Quality did not have time to
evaluate the Secondary Containment onsite. Please revisit Part 11 Section A.4. of the NCG 120070 permit to
make sure the facility is compliant with Secondary Containment Requirements and Records.
Required Response
Please respond to the following items by March 31, 2011.
Part II Section A. 2. — Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan Deviation.
An inspection of the facility by the Division of Land Resources is needed. By copy of this Notice of Violation
the Division of Water Quality is requesting a compliance inspection be performed by the Division of Land
Resources.
During the January 27, 2011 inspection four (4) erosion control basins were noted: two (2) permitted basins and
two (2) online non -permitted basins. Please apply to Division of Land Resources (DLR) if you plan to maintain
basins in the vicinity of the 2 online basins. Note: Online basins are not permittable, therefore you need to
evaluate this area for acceptable erosion control and explain how you plan to restore the stream. A Plan
Modification submitted to DLR may be needed for Sediment Basin # 1.
Part II Section A. 3. - Landfill Permit Water Protection Requirements.
The Division of Waste Management issued this Landfill a Notice of Violation dated May 26, 2010 for 15A
NCAC 13B. 1626 (8)(d). The NCG120070 permit requires you to be compliant with the Landfill Permit.
Please explain when you plan to be in compliance with Division of Waste Management.
Also, please explain why the Water Quality Standards Violations occurred and, until further notice, initiate
monthly Analytical Monitoring of Woodruff Branch for the following parameters: pH, temperature, and
turbidity. These samples shall be taken from Woodruff Branch monthlyjust downstream of the confluence of
Woodruff Branch and Sediment Basin 91. This sampling shall begin immediately and sample results shall be
submitted to: Division of Water Quality, 2090 HWY 70, Swannanoa NC 28778.

Transylvania County Landfill
February 15, 2011
1 Page 3 of 3
Rewired Response (Continued)
Part II Section B - Analytical Monitoring Requirements.
Until further notice, Analytical Monitoring of the Stormwater Discharge Outfall locations shall be
conducted monthly for the parameters required in Table 1 of your NCG120070 permit. This sampling shall
begin immediately and sample results shall be submitted to: Division of Water Quality, 2090 HWY 70,
Swannanoa NC 28778.
Part II Section C - Qualitative Monitoring Requirements.
Until further notice, submit the Qualitative Monitoring of the Stormwater Discharge Outfall for the
parameters required in Table 4 of your NCG120070 permit. These inspections shall begin immediately and the
inspections shall be submitted weekly to: Division of Water Quality, 2090 HWY 70, Swannanoa NC 28778.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. This office requires that the violations, detailed above, be abated
immediately: These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation. Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact
Linda Wiggs [phone].
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
cc: Central Files
Asheville Files
C DWM-ARO
DLR-ARO
Transylvania County Manger
DWM-Ervin Lane (e-copy)
Joyce Engineering-Hannu (e-copy)
S:ISWP1Transylvan ia\StormwaterlNCG12 Land fiilsltransco LandfillWOV-201 l-pe-0089.2.doc

Transylvania County, NC -- Printable Map
Page 1 of 1
DISCLAIMER: The information
Pin. 8542-84-8134-000
Owner:
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
,o
Sale Date: 198808
Sale Price: $0
Transylvania County, NC
8
d on this page is NOT to be construelor used as a 'legal description". Map information is
ieved to be accurate but accuracy is t guaranteed.
Parcels
Acres: 735.950
Heated Sq.Ft.: 2200
Township: 6
Deed Book: 308
Deed Page: 414
Sale Inst: WD
Sale Imp: V
Other Attributes
at point 852083, 527301
Zoning: Map Grid:
None Tile Name: 855201
v A,
j�
Zoning:
Land Value: $4,122,700
Bldg Value: $289,510
Year Built: 1989
XFOB Value: $37,450
Assessed Value: $4,449,660
Legal Address: TC-WOODFIN
LANDFILL
W C,-04 — I 3 http:Ilmvw.webgi
ia.Anderson&Associates, Inc. http:l/wtwa,andassoc.cor�r p/ L
http://arcims.webgis.net/nc/transyIvania/printable2.asp 2/2/2011

DATE: 12/21/10
ENGINEERING, INC SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOG
Project Name: Trans3dvania_Co.-Woodruff Project/Task No.: 00336.1000.11.14
Surface Point ID: SWMP-Stream 2 Sampler(s): A. Everhart
Location:_ Approximately 10 feet downstream form Pond outlet. _
Field Parameters:
Time of Sampling: 9:30
PH: 6.15
Temperature : 4.3 (°C)
Conductivity : 108.5 (AS) 37.2 !/ rp
; (vAl
Turbidity : (ntu) V
Comments/Sample Description weather conditions, o or, color, silt, etc.):
Cloud 30's
Field Blank_12/21/10 0 1200
Sketch of Sample Location (include flow direction,
iyp-Oi x t
Signature:
age pathways, etc.):
5o n?- sh'aam
Date.,. I Z I x r //D
QAJQC Sign Off: � i� _ � ^_ Date:

J
DATE: 12/21 /10
ENGINEERING, INC SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOG
Project Name:. Transylvania Co. -Woodruff Project/Task No.: 00336.1000.11.14
Surface Point ID: SWMP-Pond Sampler(s): A. Everhart
Location: From the lower sediment pond below the leachate lagoon
Field Parameters:
Time of Sampling:
PH:
Temperature:
Conductivity ;
Turbidity :
9:20
6.03
4.9 (°C)
108.1 � (µS)
33.8 (ntu)
Comments/Sample Description(weather conditions, odor, color, silt, etc.):
Cloudy 30's
Sketch of Sample Location (include flow direction, drainage pathways, etc.):
�NIJ-iG
Signature:
u
v�
4
Date: I Z� Z ( (lO
QA/QC Sign Off:— i�� Date:
rT
- I"1- 1

r
'} a
J
O
- / gigs
\SWMP-Pond SS4-P5T
'� >`' Ilia " s
t S,S3-P5B
881-Pond;Oudet °
r `_o oQ
,SWMP-Stream `� (Surface aid 1)5') SS2-P4B g
7a
OO cr 0 L
-�� - a° SWMP-S#ream2 o aQ�w.
c'
W
¢ i
)M
P4T /
PROJECT NO.
1 ` _ 336.1000.11
© GRAPHIC SCALE SCALE
a 25 sa too AS NOTED ;
URAWINGNO. 6
(FEET)
`+ ATTACH.1 i

Attachment 2
Summary of Analytical Results
Sutiaee Water Samples
Sail stunples
tin 2L
NC 2B Surface
SR'\[P -
SRTIP -
SWMP-
Soil -to -%Paler SS1 -Pond Outlet SSl-Pond Outlet
LD1P-3 Ocluber
Constituent
Gronndard
Water
Prond
Stream
Stream 2
MSCC (Surface) { 1.5')
SS2 - P4B SS3 - P5B
titi4 -PST
Sti5 • P4T
Blanks
ZOSQ
Standard
Standard•
`
f
Tolarme (July 20. 20101
0.663
ND
NM
L6 J NM
ND 2.3
ND ND
ND
600
0.36
4,3(10
ND
Toluene (Resumple - nee 21, 2010)
0.291
NM
ND
NO ND
NM ND
NM NM
ND
Noics:
I -SWAP results repotted in uglL(including NC 2B and NC 21, Standards)
2. SS results reporled in uglKg (including MSCC)
3. ND = Not detected
4. NN1 = \ot tunnilarcd
5. 1 = Estirnated value since the cuncentratinn is helow the lahmaror's rcrxirting lintit.
6. 'Wrxxtrul1 Branch is classified as Trout Waters. NC 213 Slandard for Toluenc for Freshssater Aquatic Ufc is 1 i µ VL.
7. MSCC = Maximum Soil Coutwmitent Cuncentmtion Level
++R
Transylvania County Woodruff landfill Joyce Engineering, Inc.

aceAnalyfical
twrw.pacelaCs.o�m
Project: 336.1000,11.12 TRANS. WOODRUFF
Pace Project No.: 9284552
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
98DO YinceyAve, Suite 100
HuntersviSle, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: 8807-SS1-POND OUTLET
Lab ID: 9284552007
Collected:
12/21/10 11:30
Received: 12/21/10 13:49 Matrix: Solid
(1.5)
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Report
Parameters
Results Units
Limit
MDL DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Quaff
8260/5035A Volatile Organics
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Toluene
ND uglkg
1.7
0.62 1
12/31/10 02:58
108-88-3
Dibromo8uoromethane (S)
89 %
70-130
1
1213V10 02:58
1868-53-7
Toluene-d8 (S)
102 %
70-130
1
12/31/10 02:58
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (5)
93 %
70-130
1
12/31/10 02:58
460-00-4
1,2-Dichloroelhane-d4 (S)
82 %
70-132
1
12/31/10 02:58
17060-07-0
Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87
Percent Moisture 18.6 °% 0.10 0.10 1 12/22/10 17:48
Date: 01/1212011 10:29 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of 16
This report shall not he reproduced, except in f0,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
nehk

j �eN tl��'•
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document
The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be comp4ated accurately.
Section A Section B Section C
Required Client Information: Required Project Information: Invoice Information: P8 @ : 1 Of 1
Company: a Joyce En ineerin -NC Report To: Jeremey Kerly Attention: Lecia Jones
Address 2211 West Meadowview Rd Copy To: company Name Joyce Engineering
Greensboro, NO 27407
Address: 1604 Ownhy Lane, Richmond, VA 2322
tatafv'¢gency';e r sew°
Email To jkerlv(c�ioviceenaineerinp.com
Purchase Order No.
Pace Quote Reference:
Phone: [phone] JFax
Client Project ID: 336.1000,11,12 Trans. Woodruff
Pace Project Manager: Godwin, Kevin
Requested Due Date/TAT: 10 Day (Default)
Container Order Number;
Pace Profile p;
North Carolina
i=_�)fl!l��SRequ�ated?%�aljists�fltt_ered'.iY11Vj;,3"
t�:l
`3��t
i�y�;+�, .K s5�{ g
wM.rrxlx cool:
v
°
COLLECTED
o
Preservatives
arn Wre Watu CYW
wr
V
N
W.—W4.
SAMPLE ID sib sL
I
t9
START
END
V
F+
c
of a
One Character per box. W4 wP
AR
w
a
(A'z, 0.91,')
OU
w
S
i
U
ati�r OT
m
Sample Ida ust he unique Tl Ts
x
TUATETIMe
w
u
a
rtl
z
D
p
m
c
}�-
<
DATEN
TIME
73
z
xZ
V
m
z
r
z
L
m
2
ID'
$o
Ov_;Ll
e
F
z
8807-SWMP-Pond
VVT
i
lttu
�r!
iC
x
2
8807•SWMP-Stream2
WT
7 t
iJ
x
•L
x
8ap7•SS3•P5B
SL
4
U
x
�-4
8807•SS1•Pond Outlet(Surtara)
SI-
O
8807•SS1-Pond OLAot 4yf Y
SI-4—
x
1;=+6
8807-Field Blank
Z t1 r
Lao
3
003
WT
x
A.
8W7-Tnp Blank
WT
I woo
x
10 `
..=z11Lr
.9 2
'r -ram .r"7�CttAOO1T10NALCOMtItENTS 't`-'�-� �R
,=� ,RELINQUISHED.$YfAFFILIAT10Ny'y`•
x 'OATE 1b
.�e11iYll:`.'�"r
• CCEP7EgB'(r1�AFF1
�AilpN:."
I.:l:tev
?QATE
yv
`'�T1ME�:yi
T��t`SAIJIPCECONOtT10
S' "�r
r 'r!.; ..
:' :err y;r� G. �u
+�iS3r,LPIF!T:�+r:t
'✓i'.•Stl
ee a
�.:�F,�
'�' 4 -f.: .T r::1JL:.6�,'v
7"a1,TF
I 'L`,
.fi73+X'i!
i::
fir.::. S:n �•1F
,ir. ZS=i:
w:.'Cx`".
`
J
! Jjj
/
$A6IPLERNAMEANDSIGNATWREYr^.)�QE}ter,
sl fL' ♦ 1. ,.{J.L;. .'i'_!K.S. LLBr
t•°-N'Sryt `�'1>t
t .1J+1:. .riii{�t"�`1rllLu}Sig^
friMlSt�ii'fn.. i`�.
C
C
PRINT Name of SAMPLER: � EVe-r —
"r
�
m --
"
�' u
.�
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER:
)ATE Signed:
z
W
y
w
a
E
rr 1
r'
o_
0N}

vPNtH' c.p�y .
ellas
18761
J uvs y&anua count*
SaNd Waroie OepatOnaa
SUU Roam& Jqoad
.!` woatd, ,Ne 28712
Mr. Mark Poindexter
Environmental Program Supervisor
NC Division of Waste Management
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Dear Mr. Poindexter:
RECEIVED
NOV222010
SOLID WASTE SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Let me begin by thanking you and your staff for coming to themeeting at the
Transylvania County Landfill on -November 151h..1.belieice that.progress was
made toward resolving our difference of opinion about the NOV issued to
Transylvania -County concerning ,the alleged..leachate. release to our sediment
basin. It,was a.relief to hear -you say that you understand. my position jand
explanation that we did not pump leachate into the sediment basin. Further, it is
my understanding that we do not need to prepare the proposed Leachate
Release and Prevention plan since many of its procedures are already part of our
operations plan.
I understand and share your concern about the presence of a small amount of
toluene in two soil samples. and one surface water sample from the sediment
basin. It is my belief that any toluene must havecome from the borrow or white
goods areas or the tower road. We have changed our operational procedures
whereby we will no longer fuel equipment in the borrow area and will.closely
monitor motorized equipment in our white goods and scrap metal areas.
We have removed the sediment from the basin and put that in the lined landfill.
When the second 2010 semi-annual water monitoring sampling was conducted in
the last week of October extra samples were taken and tested for Appendix 1
constituents, BOD, COD, sulfate, phosphorus, and nitrate.. The.preliminary lab
results.do not indicate evidence.for:Ieachate.release..from the lined area.
We propose, to conduct additional soil testing of the sediment in the basin and at
the pipe,outlet. The soil testing would be conducted with a hand auger to.,
advance deeper in the soil column in an effort to investigate if contaminants such
as toluene are present deeper in the soil. We will be asking Joyce Engineering

to contact Ervin Lane to discuss issues related to sampling results, and when
resampling will be required in accordance with current section rules.
We believe that these measures will help restore compliance at the Woodruff
Landfill and establish whether there is a contamination problem. Transylvania
County is committed to protecting the surface and ground water at the landfill and
abiding by our permit. We look forward to working with NCDENR to insure this
happens.
Sincerely, J4 g'_"
Jeff Brooks ire, Solid Waste Director
Cc: Deb, Aja, Western District Supervisor
Ervin Lane, Compliance Hydrogeologist
Allen Gaither; Regional Engineer
Hannu Kemppinen, Joyce Engineering
Arthur C. Wilson, Jr., Transylvania County Manager
File
Jeff Brookshire, Director
828-884-6830
jeff,[e-mail]

R C E IVE D
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS y►w � � � oo COUNTY MA11•AGER
Jason Chappell, Chairman a` y, n Arthur C. Wilson, Jr.
Kelvin Phil ips, Vice Chairman i } AU G t k V 2010 828-884.3100
Lynn Bullock Fax [phone]
Mike Hawkins '"828-994-3107
Dery1e Hogsae street
SOLID WASTE urnortevsra, NC 2S7712
a6` ASH"LLE RLGIONAt OFFICE
Omit /, Z MWMIA/
August 5, 2010
Troy Harrison
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Mr. Harrison,
This letter is in response to your Leachate Management letter of July 28,.2010. In that letter
you ask for a response to 10 questions and I will respond in order.
Question #1. Before -the May 26 audit the sump pump in Phase 5 was normally left in the off
position unless there was water in the sump or a significant rain event was forecast,, . .-
Question #2. According to my records, the sump pump was turned on Saturday, May 22, due to
rain on Friday night- There was a small amount of rain on Monday the 24th. All the water in the
sump area was pumped out by Tuesday and Landfill Supervisor Ronnie Leonard turned the
pump off. The pump was not turned on again until Friday, May 28, when the water in the sump
area was pumped into the leachate tank.
j •
Question #3. May 26 was the only day that we observed any leachate seeping into the Phase 5
sump area. That leachate and the silt that the leachate ran across were removed after being
pumped out on May 28. No leachate seeps have been detected since May 26 and that is why
subsequent stormwater has been diverted to the sediment basin.
Question.#4. The pump is left in the off position. Each morning the landfill area is checked for
seeps and breakouts. If leachate were to be found going into the Phase 5 area the, pump will
not be turned on until the flow is diverted to the leachate tank. If no leachate is found going
into Phase 5 then the flow will go to the sediment basin.
Question #5-. We removed sediment that we felt the leachate had contacted and placed that
sediment in the landfill.
Question #6. Staff has had additional training in methods to minimize future seep. breakouts.
Points of emphasis include making sure large items (sofas, mattresses, etc) are not left at the
toe of the slope but worked into the middle of the working face; making sure to pull back cover

material when moving the working face to a new area; keeping the working face as small as
possible to minimize, rain water infiltration. Berms have been installed to control surface run
off. We continue to make daily visual inspections in efforts to prevent any problems from
occurring. We have changed the procedure for operating the Phase 5 sump pump as outlined
in Question #4.
Question V. On May 26 the pump in Phase 5 was in the off position and did not pump water
into the sediment basin. '
Question #8. The Tax Assessor's office confirmed that the flyover pictures were taken on
March 9, 2008. 1 checked my daily records and we had a storm on March 4 that knocked out
power to the landfill and dumped 2.8 inches of rain. I noted that we had damage to the ditch
line between Phases 4 and 5 due to the large amount of surface stormwater that came down
the slope. There was also damage to the drain that goes under the road at the bottom of Phase
4. On March 5 and 6, 1 noted that we did repair work on the drain and the ditch and ran 7 loads
of leachate. On March 7 we had another 1.26 inches of rain and ran 4 loads of leachate. We
hauled 10 loads of dirt on March 11 for cover and slope repairs. I have no mention of a
leachate breakout in my notes. We did have erosion problems due to the heavy rains and we
took steps to repair them as quickly as possible. I maintain what you see in the picture is the
aforementioned damages created by the heavy rains. Joyce Engineering was here.-April:22 and
`c23; 200,8 to conduct the water sampling tests. The results of those tests showed no
exceedences in the surface water or ground water samples.
Question #9. There is no question #9.
Question #10. l did not receive a letter from Mr. Gaither. My county manager, Artie Wilson,
contacted him on Tuesday, August 3 and he indicated that he had failed'to send out the letter.
In an e-mail, he states that he would like to have my plan for sediment removal from the sump
area of Phase 5 by August 20.
Question #11. Mr. Gaither states in his a -mail that we need a LCS line cleaning annually with a
camera inspection every five years. We had a cleaning with a camera inspection in June of
2009 of the lines in Phases 1,2,3,4, and S. We then had a cleaning of all the lines on June 8 and
June 10 of 2010. 1 plan to have a cleaning and camera inspection of the Phase 5 lines before we
start putting waste in Phase 5.
In summary, I maintain that the leachate breakout discovered on May 26 did not result in
leachate being pumped to the detention pond. The results of the July 20, 2010 test just
received from Joyce Engineering supports my position. We do understand your concern about
the pump being in the automatic mode. The procedure has been changed forthe pump to be
in the off position and will not be turned on until a visual inspection has been made to see if
there are any leachate seeps. We hope this will resolve your concerns and we welcome any
suggestions you may have.

Please contact me if you have any further questions or concerns.
Jeff Brookshire
Director of Solid Waste
Transylvania County
Cc: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head
Deb, Aja, Western District Supervisor
Ervin Lane, Compliance Hydrogeologist
Allen Gaither, Regional Engineer
Arthur C. Wilson, J'r., Transylvania County Manager
File

,l
^.ter►�_
ICDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Paves Perdue Dexter R. Matthews
Governor Director
July 28, 2010
Jeff Brookshire
Director of Solid Waste,
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Transylvania County
RE: Leachate Management
Transylvania County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility
Permit No. 88-07
Dear Mr. Brookshire:
Dee freeman
Secretary
This letter Is to respond to your letter dated June 24, 2010 concerning the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued to
Transylvania County on June 4, 2010 for violations observed at the Transylvania County Landfill on May, 26
2010. The NOV staged in part:
"Liquids collected in Phase 5, including leachate from the breakouts, were directed into a
sedimentation basin via a pump that operates automatically. The pump could be connected to
the leachate collection system rather than the sedimentation basin by changing flow direction
with a valve. At the time of the audit facility staff stated that they would adjust the valve so
that Phase 5 would be pumped to the leachate collection system."
Your response letter describes actions that Transylvania County has taken to in regards to the leachate
breakouts into Phase 5.
In Paragraph 4, you state:
"Wednesday morning, May 26, you and Paul Crissman arrived. We discovered 3 seeps going to
the sump area. The sump pump was off and no water was pumped out of the sump area".
During a telephone conversation on June 22, 2010 with you, Artie Wilson, Transylvania County Manager, and
me, Mr. Wilson said that after you discovered the leachate breakout into Phase 5, you diverted the flow valve
direction from the sedimentation basin to the leachate collection tank. In addition, during a telephone
conversation on June 3, 2010, you said the sump pump for Phase 5 was directed to the leachate collection
2090 US Highway 70, 5wannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.wastenoinc.org
An Equal Oppo[ip" 1 Af iirmathm Action Empkw
None Carolina
Naturally
J

1
tank after the audit on May 26, t-cri0 on the same date. It was my understanding that the Phase 5 sump
pump was turned on to operate automatically on May 26, 2010 before the discovery of the leachate breakout
into Phase 5. In our conversation on June 23, 2010 you stated that records are not kept on the Phase 5 sump
pump.
In order to better understand the past, present and future operating procedure at the Transylvania County
MSW landfill, please answer the following questions:
1. Before the May 26, 2010 audit, what was the normal setting and mode of operation for the Phase 5
sump pump?
Z. When -was -the -setting -and -mode -of -operation changed?
3. Why was the decision made to direct flow to the sedimentation basin as was observed in the June 23,
2010 audit.
4. What is the setting and mode of operation now?
In paragraph 6, you state:
"We then dug out the silt that the leachate had run across In the sump area and put that silt in
the working face area."
5. What method did you use to determine that the remaining sediment in the sump area of Phase 5 was
not contaminated with leachate?
6. What are the future plans for prevention of leachate from getting into the sump area of Phase 5?
In paragraph 8, you state:
"Bever did any leachate go onto any unlined area as mentioned previously. It Is our procedure
to check the slopes everyday for seeps. If one was found leaking into the sump area of Phase
5 we would not pump any water in the sump area to the sediment basin. Contaminated water
would be pumped into the leachate tank. in understand you statement about the potential
being there for a discharge, but we did not discharge any leachate to the sedimentation basin."
7. If the Phase 5 sump pump is operated automatically, please explain how the facility controlled
leachate from leaving the liner system.
The Transylvania County GIS photograph reveals a leachate breakout into Phase 5. The website
indicates the photograph was taken in 2008.
8. What was the response to that event and is there a log of repair activity for the seeps shown in
the aerial photograph?
Allen Gaither, Solid Waste Section, Regional Engineer, in a letter dated July 16, 2010, asked for
Transylvania Country prepare and submit a written plan describing the process for sediment removal
from the low point of Phase 5 including measures to ensure the geo-membrane liner is not damaged.
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, Norlh Carolina 28778
Phone, 828-296-45001 FAX [phone] Internet; wmu.wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Acton Employer
Aurallb,
yeCarolina

The letter also asked for Transylvania County to perform a jet -cleaning ano camera inspection on the
entire Phase 5 Leachate Collection System
10. What is the status of the written plan requested by Mr. Gaither?
11. The jet -cleaning and camera inspection of the leachate collection system is required annually.
Please submit the most recent results of the inspection to me by August 6, 2010. .
If you should have any questions or require my assistance in the future please do not hesitate to call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Troy Harrison
Environmental Senior Specialist
Cc: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Ervin Lane, Compliance Hydrogeologist
Allen Gaither, Regional Engineer
Arthur Wilson, Jr., Transylvania County Manager
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet; www.wastenoinc.org
An Equd Opporhiniq 1 A(flrmaUve Action Emaoyer
Noe Carolina
N turallUJ1

2.0 FACILITY MONITORING PROGRAM
2.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program
Groundwater monitoring at the Woodruff Landfill is completed in accordance with the
Detection Monitoring Program and the Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the facility.
Groundwater samples are collected semiannually and are analyzed for North Carolina
Solid Waste Section Appendix 1 constituents.
The monitoring network at the Woodruff Landfill consists of two upgradient wells (MW-
3 and MW-10) and eleven downgradient monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-5, MW-
6, MW-8, MW-9S, MW-9D, MW-11, MW-12S, MW-12D, and MW-13).
Monitoring
Well
Date
Installed
Classification
Monitoring
Program
Total Depth
from TOC (ft)
Lithology of
Screened Interval
MW-1
4/16/91
Compliance
Detection
32.66
Not Available
MW-2
4116/91
Compliance
Detection
25.42
Not Available
MW-3
4116/91
Background
Detection
42.55
Not Available
MW-4
4117/91
Abandoned
-
-
-
MW-5
4117/91
Compliance
Detection
35.02
Not Available
MW-6
9119/94
Compliance
Detection
24.00
PWR/Bedrock
MW-7
9121/94
Abandoned
-
-
MW-8
9120/94
Compliance
Detection
34.56
PWR/Bedrock
MW-9S
1109/01
Compliance
Detection
45.00
PWR/Bedrock
MW-9D
1109/01
Compliance
Detection
86.50
Bedrock
MW-10
11/13/06
Background
Detection
40.50
Bedrock
MW-11
11/09/06
Compliance
Detection
26.50
PWR/Bedrock
MW-12S
11/21/06
Compliance
Detection
33.50
Saprolite/Fill
MW-12D
11/21/06
Compliance
Detection
52.50
Bedrock
MW-13
11/20/06
Compliance
Detection
48.41
Bedrock
2.2 Surface Water Monitoring Program
Surface water monitoring at the Woodruff Landfill is completed in accordance with
NCSWMR §0602 (Surface Water Monitoring) and the approved Water Quality
Monitoring Plan for the facility. Surface Water samples are collected semiannually and
are analyzed for North Carolina Solid Waste Section Appendix I constituents. In
additional to Appendix I constituents, SMP-2 is sampled for dissolved methane.
The surface monitoring networks consist of four sampling points: SMP-1 is located
downstream from the sediment pond below the leachate tank, SMP-2 is located at the end
of the underdrain from Phase 4 entering the sediment pond, SMP-3 is located
approximately 150 foot downstream from MW-1 1, and SMP-4 is located at the end of the
underdrain from Phase 5.
First Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Report of 2010 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
Transylvania County Woodruff Landfill, Permit No. 88-07 July 2010
2

TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SURFACE WATER FIELD PARANIFTERS
Parartx[rr I
Date
SMPA
SNIP-2
SNIP-3
SNIP-4
Tcmperature
Fcb-94
10
N]
NN1
N[
(degrees Q
Aug-94
17
NI
NM
NI
Feb-95
II
NI
NM
NI
SepA5
203
NI
NM
NS
Fcb-96
NA
NI
NM
N]
Oct-96
15,0
NI
NM
NI
May-97
19,5
NI
NM
N]
Oct-97
17,4
NI
NN4
N]
Apr-98
'21,61
NI
NM
N]
Oct-98
Dry
N1
NM
N1
Apr-99
18.9
N]
NM
NI
Oct-99
11.1
N]
NM
N[
Apr -DO
12.9
N]
NM
NI
Oct-00
13.4
N]
NM
N1
Apr-01
14.5
NI
NM
N[
Oct-01
15.1
N1
NM
N1
Apr-02
13.3
NI
NM
NJ
Oct-02
15.2
19.6
NM
N]
Apr-03
6.30
13.3
NM
N]
OCt-03
11.8
15.9
NM
NI
Apr-04
15,9
13.3
NNS
N1
Oct-04
17.1
15.2
NM
Ni
Apr-05
9,9
11.2
NM
NJ
Resample
Jun-05
21.4.
NS
NM
Nl
Oct-05
16,9
14.3
NNf
NJ
19-Apr-06
14,8
14.0
NM
NJ
19-Oct-06
18.05
14.95
NM
NJ
25-Apr-07
15.7
19.1
NM
NI
Resample
10Jul-07
22.1-
16,7
NM
NI
17-Oct-07
14.1
14.8
NM
NI
23-Apr-09
14.6
NS
NM
NI
Resample
11-Jun-03
283-
NS
NM
NI
Resample
16-lu1-08
19.4
NS
NM
NI
23-Oct-08
10,8
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
14,9
NS
8.9
Dry
I5-Oct-09
115
NS
9.3
11.2
23-Apr-10
14.4
Py
10,8
Dry
Turbidity
Oct-96
NA
NI
NM
NJ
(N'I'Us)
May-97
31.7
NI
NM
NI
Oct-97
12A
NI
NM
NI
Apr-98
NA
NI
NM
NI
Oct-98
Dry
NI
NM
NI
Apr-99
15.7
NI
NA]
NI
Oct-99
49.2
NI
NA1
NI
Apr-00
18,9
NI
NN1
NI
Oct-00
8.35
NI
NM
NI
Apr-01
M9
NI
NNI
NI
Oct-01
10.3
NI
NM
NI
Apr-02
12,0
NJ
NN1
NI
Oct-02
37.3
14,7
NM
NI
Apr-03
NA.
165 }
NM
NI
Oct-03
59.4
>i000/
NM
NI
Apr-04
16.0
14.1
NM
NI ,
Oct-04
15.92,
3.51.
NM
N]
Apr-05
93.9
327,
NM
NI
Resample
Jun-05
90.7
NS
NM
NI
Oct-05
10.4
3.52
NM
NI
19-Apr-06
9.33.
13.9
NM
NI
19-Oct-06
56.50
100.00
NM
NI
25-Apr-07
7.99
10.72
NM
NI
Resample
10-lu1-07
52,6
25.0
NM
NI
17-Oct-07
191
4.07
NM
NI
23-Apr-08
14.07,
NS
NN1
NJ
Resample
Il-Jun-0S
1166;
NS
NM
NI
Resample
16-Jul-09
12,89
NS
NM
NI
22-Oct-08
5.53
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
160.0,
NS
35.58
Dry
15-Oct-09
170,
NS
i 545,
6
23-Apr-10
8.84
Dry
3.37
Dry
Noles;
1. NS = Not sampled.
2. NM =Not required For monitoring.
3. All parameters were measured in the field.
4. NA = Not available,
S. Dry= Surface water monitoring point considered to be dry.
6, NI - Not installed,
-fnn ry1-ia C-1, W-Iro 1.an4ill Pqt, 2 ui : I.Y. lingincering, Inc.

BOARD OF COMMESSIONERS
Jason Chappell, Chairman
Kelvin Phillips, Vice Chairman
Lynn Bullock
Mice Hawkins
Daryk Hoped
i�+,N1A COG -
9�
S E
4 ^
l Sit
COUNTY MANAGER
Arthur C. Wilson, Jr.
928-894-3100
Fax [phone]
828. 94-3107
21 East Main Street
Brevard, NC 28712
RECEIVE®.
. . June 24, 2010 JUN 2 $ 2MO
Troy Harrison
Asheville Regional Office SOLID WASTE SECTION .
2090 US Highway 70 ASHEMLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Mr. Harrison,
This letter is in response to the FacilityCompliance Audit Report of May 26, 2010. In that
report you issued allotice of Violation that Transylvania County released leachate into the
unlined sedimentation basin. I do not agree with your conclusion and I will explain the steps my
staff and I took toprevent a discharge.
I did a visual inspection of the landfill the morning of -May 24 and found no seeps. We had 0.94
inches of rain the Friday before so I paid particular attention to the sump area of Phase 5. The
storm water that collected in the sump area was pumped out into the sedimentation basin -
We had 0.1:1 inches of rain on Monday night. Landfill Supervisor Ronnie Leonard took the daily
readings on Tuesday, May 25. He did not observe any seeps and a small amount of storm water
was pumped out of the sump area.. The pump was turned off.
Wednesday morning, May 26, you and Paul Crissman arrived. We discovered 3 seeps going into
the sump area.. The sump. pump was off and no water was pumped out of the sump area. It did
not rain any on Wednesday.
On Thursday, May 27, my staff dug out the areas above the seeps and we removed a large
fibrous mass that we think caused the upper seep (2 and 3 in your picture). Water going into this
hole was observed draining strai& down the hole into the Phase 4 area. No water went into
Phase 5. There was no rain on Thursday.
On Friday, May 28, there was some leachate puddled in the hole we dug above seep number 1.
We dug that hole out a little deeper and' it drained down into the phase 4 area. ' No leachate was
observed going into the Phase 5 sump area for the second day: We pumped the water that was in
the sump area into the leachate tank. We then dug out the silt that the leachate. had run across in
the sump area and put that silt in the working face area -
We checked these areas at least daily as normal operations procedures including the next two
weeks. Never did we observe any more seepage into Phase 5 nor ponding in the holes we had:

dug. 'We filled the holes on June 15 with garbage and covered the area with soil. We hydro -
seeded this area on June 16.
Never did any leachate go onto any. unlined area as mentioned previously. It is our procedure to
check the slopes everyday for seeps. If one was found leaking into the sump area of Phase 5 we
would not pump any water in the sump area to the sediment basin. Contaminated water would
be pumped into the leachate tank. I understand your statement about the potential being there for
a discharge, but we did not discharge any leachate to the sedimentation pond. We, took the
appropriate, action and to say otherwise is inaccurate. Unfortunately,: we do have seeps from
time to time but we stop and contain them as quickly as possible. 'The water in our sediment
basin and Woodruff Creek is tested twice a year and we have. always had good results.
Since I do not agree with your assertion that we had an actual violation, I do not understand why
a NOV was issued, and.I am unsure of the next step in the procedure. I was told by the State
Hydro -geologist, Ervin Lane, that I need to pump out all the water that is- in the sedimentation
basin. I feel that this is unnecessary. I can provide you results of water sampling and, if
necessary, have soil samples taken.. Of course, Transylvania County will continue to comply
with the state's rules and regulations. The other areas mentioned in the report have either been
correctedor is in the process of being corrected (sign, flare and small concrete pad in the oil
collection area).
We took forward to hearing from you regarding this issue.
Sinc;roo
l
Jeff shire
Director of Solid Waste
Transylvania County
Cc: Meinbers; Board of Commissioners
County Manager
County Attorney
File

NCDENR
NORTH CI OLINA DFP� mT['1 OF
EM/IRONMEN A o FSAtLJ Red RCF$
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
iUNIT TYPE:
Lined
X
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
COUNTY: Transylvania
MSWLF
PERMIT NO.: 88-07
Closed
HHW
X
White
X
Incin
T&P
x
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE: COMPLIANCE
CDLF
TircT&P1
X
Tim
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collccsian
Monofill
Landfilk
Date of Audit: June 23, 2010 Date of Last Audit: May 26, 2010
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Transylvania Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
GPS COORDINATES: N: 35,1 1860 E:-82.84466
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Jeff Brookshire, Transylvania Solid Waste Director
828-884-6830
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS:
500 Howell Road
Brevard, NC 28712
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Troy Harrison, Environmental Senior Specialist, DENRIDWM/Solid Waste Section
Jeff Brookshire, Transylvania County Solid Waste
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Original Permit to Operate (Phases 1 & 2) issued 6/13/1990
Permit Renewal (Phase 3) issued 6/30/1995
Amendment (Phase 4; Facility Plan; LCID; HHW; YWTP) issued 5/28/2002
Modification (Landfill Gas Flare; Revised Operations Plan) issued 3/11/2004
Amendment (Permit to Construct; Phase 5) issued 8/20/2007
Amendment (Permit to Operate; Phase 5) issued March 18, 2008
Modification (Permit to Operate; Phase 5) issued August 20, 2009
Amendment (Permit to Operate; Phase 5) issued June 7, 2010; with revised Operations Plan
Deadline to submit application for amendment or modification: 10/26/2012
Permit expiration date: 3/26/2013
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Partial Audit of MSW Landfill
NOTICE OF VIOLATION(S):
No new violations

0
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDYI PORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS:
Notice of Violation issued on June 4, 2010 for the audit conducted on May 26, 2010:
15A North Carolina Administrative Code 13B .1626 (8)(d) states "leachate shall be contained on site or
properly treated prior to discharge. "
The Transylvania County Operations Plan dated September-2008 and revised in May-2009 (Operations Plan)
states: "leachate from the Phase 4 sump is pumped via side -slope riser to the pump station. All leachate
collecting _in.the_pump station will be pumped to the leachate tank. Leachate from phase 5 is pumped via side
slope riser directly to the leachate storage tank.
Three leachate breakouts that flowed into Phase 5 of the landfill were observed. Leachate Flow No. I began
near the northwest corner of Phase 4 and flowed into Phase 5. Leachate Flows Nos. 2 and 3 began on the
north slope of Phase 4 and combined to flow into Phase 5. Liquids collected in Phase 5, including leachate
from the breakouts, were directed into a sedimentation basin via a pump that operates automatically. The
pump could be connected to the leachate collection system rather than the sedimentation basin by changing
flow direction with a valve. At the time of the audit,facility staff stated that they would adjust the valve so that
Phase 5 would be pumped to the leachate collection system.
Transylvania County was in violation of 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 13B .1626 (8)(d) in that
leachate was released outside Phase 4 into Phase 5, and then off the liner system into an unlined
sedimentation basin, and was not first properly treated prior to discharge.
Transylvania County was in violation of the Operations Plan in that leachate in Phase 5 was not pumped
directly to the leachate storage tank.
During the June 23, 2010 facility audit, Mr. Brookshire stated that some of the contaminated sediment was
removed from the sump area of Phase 5 but not all. No testing of sediment in the sump of Phase 5 or the
sediment basin has been conducted as requested by Ervin Lane on June 18, 2010. A new QA/QC for leachate
collection for Phase has not been received.
The Notice of Violation issued on June 4, 2010 for violations observed on May 26, 2010 has not been
resolved.
Mr. Brookshire, in a written response to the Notice of Violation dated June 24, 2010, offered to provide
results of water sampling and have soil samples taken. Please coordinate this with Ervin Lane, Solid
Waste Section Hydrogeologist at [phone] by July 23, 2010 and provide the results by July 30,
2010.
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS:
MSW Landfill Observations
l . The leachate pump operations were discussed. Records were being kept for pumps for Phases 1 through 4.
Records were not being kept for the pump for Phase 5. Mr. Brookshire was instructed to begin keeping
operation records for the Phase 5 pump. At the time of the audit, the Phase 5 pump was manually turned off.
Mr. Brookshire stated that normally, the pump is automatically set to turn on when the basin liquid level
reaches 36.0 inches and pumps down to 18.2 inches. There was inch of rain the previous night according to
Mr. Brookshire; this was confirmed by rainfall data taken at the landfill. Rainfall records at the landfill are
kept on a daily basis and a printout was obtained with data from 1 112/09 to 6/23/10.
It was observed that the Phase 5 pump was not directed to the leachate tank but to the sedimentation
basin (See Photograph # 1). After the previous audit on May 26, 2010, Mr. Brookshire stated that he
would adjust the valve so that Phase 5 would be pumped to the leachate collection system. On June 3,
2010, Mr. Brookshire stated that the valve direction was changed on the date of the audit and Phase 5
M

it
I
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT .'ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
was connected to the leachate collection system. Please explain the decision to change the flow from
Phase 5 back to the sedimentation basin before all the sediment was removed from the sump in Phase 5.
When flow from the pump in Phase 5 is directed to the sedimentation basin, a valve is opened to a hose
connection, at a valve junction located at the leachate force main along the access road. A flexible hose is
used to direct the flow from the valve junction away from the leachate force main to one of two storm drains;
each storm drain is connected to an inlet pipe to the sedimentation basin.
Photo of valves directing flow to sedimentation basin
- _ r
j t.
r :..
4C ;.�• .
f .*a
./emu 4c
si _
�i
+� :
Pump control panel
Pump is located next to vehicle. Liquid can be directed along the road Sediment at bottom of Phase 5
cither left or right which flows to the sedimentation basin.
The leachate collection tank is upper right. The ponded water is
located in the bottom of Phase 5.
2. Mr. Brookshire explained the procedure for cleaning out the bottom portion of Phase 5 after a leachate
breakout. The breakout is repaired first then if leachate is in the sump area it is pumped to the leachate
collection tank. Mr. Brookshire said that the sediment is removed if he felt like it was contaminated. The
removed sediment was taken to the working face for cover or fire control; no assessment was been done on
the sediment. He acknowledged that all of the sediment in Phase 5 was not removed. After the repair, the
Phase 5 pump flow was directed back to the sedimentation basin.
3. The sedimentation basin was observed. There are three stages separated by berms. The first section collects
most of the sediment. The second section is the largest and the silt settles out further. The final section
empties to a stream that flows to the French Broad River.

a m�.• 4t c2� r 'ti,�{i t F yt .r'j 3"j _�
L-
All
't4
A.#. .�.1i•�t.{ e�.. i'..1 -.i
� "`�,�' �rr^f�7�-��"" .4 i`a Nv � a¢f a '�• i�r ! {} it �., .ti x� A
tl .� ., rah S � t•. },� � �'� � � { - C '. r'% y� fp ,
' a - y tt w - �;J 1 � 't' .tf _•c' ti r K r^ c..y.,wc rK�.a.' }r ,A..
{ ¢�s4 '► zY#�:ti rwy��i 5 r�' F, k�•'r '�' l<-["f.��x, ^• { F ,- r �3,-.','�r�4 ��y'�, � ?('�
'1};` rrlf•_.'uitiii,t°7Akj";.i4?T�.v''4a�','i�,��`._}��*1'++...
'' "i �s � y,. 27 S � r :3`` :e �i•��Ci"iYes�R�`ij'�i "'"`�•,fs�.x Fl��• ��+� - -u �ty �77r`
i,
i � !�'r-., 'S � � � �_ t� 1"y �i 'w h�sr-� �t�".'Si� ^�'"': Y. !) �' '�S�-a-.,-��.`� �' � . {•i.

n
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT _ 2ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
".r :Y. r-a
Exposed waste between Phases 4 & 5
Other Observations
8. The metal area was observed. White Goods wer,
Metal Recycling Area
White Goods Recycling Area
9. A new sign is being made for the Howell Road entrance to contain all of the elements required.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
Phone:
Troy Harrison
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
[phone]
f the metal.
Mailed on :July l5. 2010 by
Hand delivery
_
E-mail to Jeff Brookshire,
Certified No, 7008 0150 0000 7473 4172 to
X
Transylvania Solid Waste Dir.
X
T
Arthur C. Wilson, Jr., Transylvania County
Manager
cc: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer
Ervin Lane, Compliance Hydrogeolgist
Allen Gaither, Regional Engineer
Bill Patrakis, Solid Waste Section

DATE: 4/23/10
.� �.�
l�
r� s il,�
ENGINEERING, INC. SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOG
Project Name: Transylvania Co. -Woodruff Project/Task No.: 00336.0900.11.14
,Surface Point ID: SMP-1 Sampler(s): D. Girdner /_A. Everhart
Location: Downstream of MW-5 and sed. pond
Field Parameters:
Time of Sampling:
PH:
Temperature ;
Conductivity
Turbidity :
1125
5.59
14.4 —(°C)
79.8 (li5)
8.84 (ntu)
Comments/Sample Description(weather conditions, odor, color, silt,`etc.):
Sunnbree? 70's
Sketch of Sample Lo at n (include flow direction, drainage pathways, etc.):
t✓oa,�5 1� 1 SG R
gCP. PoAIP
ElMw-5
Signature: _ Date: �� 4a
QAIQC Sign Off- 0 Ac- Date: d)

TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF ms,rORICAL SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETERS
Parameter
Dale
SMP-1
SNIP-2
SNIF4
SMP-4
PH
Feb-94
5.60 '
NI
IQM
NI
Aug-94
6.10
N1
NNI
NI
Feb-95
' 5.80 •
NI
NM
NI
Sep-95
6.58
NI
NM
NI
Feb-96
NA
NI
Nh1
NI
Oct-96
6,20
NI
NM
NI
May-97
6.53
NI
NM
NI
Oct-97
6.70
N!
NM
NI
Apr-98
6.72
NI
NM
NI
Oct-98
Dry
NJ
NM
NI
Apr-99
6.31
NI
NM
NI
Oct-99
7.89
N1
NM
NI
Apr-00
7.39
Ni
NM
NI
Ocl-OO
5,741
Ni
NM
NI
Apr-01
6.19
NI
NM
NI
Oct-01
L5.99.)
NI
NM
NI
Apr-02
6.09
NI
NM
NI
Oct-02
5,96
5.69
NM
NI
Apr-03
5.59/
5.29
N11
NI
Oct-03
4,80/
5,60
NM
NI
Apr-04
5,96,
-6.09
623
NM
NI
Oct-04
5.81
NM
NI
Apr-05
6.56
6.22
NM
NI
Resample
Jun-05
7.00
NS
NM
NI
Oct-05
6.50
6,14
NAf
NJ
19-Apr-06
6,87
5.94
NNI
NI
19-Oct-06
6,38
5.53
Nh1
NI
25-Apr-07
6.11
5,92
NM
NI
Resamplr
10-1ul-07
6.05
6,24
NM
NI
17-Oct-07
6.43
6.49
NNI
NI
C23_Ap0S
6.20
NS
NM
NI
Rcs4mple
II-Jun-08
7,20
NS
NM
NI
Resample
16-Jul-08
600
NS
NM
NI
C23=Oct,m
5.81
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
5.94:
NS
5.85
Dry
15-Oct-09
5,99,
NS
8.41
6.41
23-Apr-10
-5,59r
Dry
5.54
Dry
Conductivity
Feb-94
29
NI
NNI
NI
(NS)
Aug-94
32
NI
NM
NI
Feb-95
22
NI
NM
NI
Sep-95
60.2
NI
NM
NI
Feb-96
NA
NI
NM
NI
Oct-96
50
NI
NM
NI
May-97
23.5
NJ
NM
NJ
Oct-97
70
NI
NM
NI
Apr-98
16
NJ
NM
NI
Oct-98
Dry
NI
NM
N!
Apr-99
60.6
NI
N41
N!
Oct-99
113
NI
NM
NI
Apr-00
6.8
NI
NM
NI
Oct-00
13.9
NI
NNI
NI
Apr-01
72.6
NI
N11
Nl
Oct-ol
35.7
NI
NM
NI
Apr-02
98
NI
NM
NI
Oct-02
113.2
1160
NM
NI
Apr-03
118,1
148,0
NM
NI
Oct-03
132.9
55.3
NM
NI
Apr-04
77.5
102.4
NM
NI
Oct-04
92
104.8
NM
NI
Apr-05
211
65.7
NM
NI
Resample
Jun-05
133.7
NS
NM
NI
Oct-05
101.8
78.7
NM
NI
19-Apr-06
54
22.0
NXI
NI
19-Oct-06
12400
74.00
NNI
NI
25-ApN)7
80.2
93.7
NM
NI
Resample
10-Jul-07
92.8
90 9
NM
NI
17-Oct-07
91.0
109.6
NM
NI
23-Apr-08
142.5
NS
NM
NI
Resample
11-Jun-08
146.5
NS
NM
M
Resample
16-10-08
125.5
NS
NM
NI
23-Oct-08
86.9
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
192.1
NS
19.26
Dry
15-Oct-09
198
NS
41.7
21.0
23-Apr-10
79.8
Dry
20.7
Dry
Trannlvmiia C-ty woodruff l.mdfili P.J. 1 of 2 Josre Cngir.xnap, Inc.

TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF H ISCORICAL SURFACE WATER CONSTITUENTS
Constituent
Date
Con rent rations in pglL
DL
RL
SNIP-]
S.MP-2
SNIP-3
S,MP-4
Blanks
Toluene
Oct-96
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NNJ
NJ
ND
May97
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Oct-97
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Apr-98
NR
2.3
ND
NJ
NM
NI
ND
Oct-98
NR
l.0
Pry
NI
NM
NI
0.3 J
Apr-99
NR
0.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Oct-99
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Apr-00
NR
5-0
ND
NI
NM
NJ
ND
Oct-00
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NJ
ND
Apr-01
' NR
5.0
N➢
NI
NM
NI
ND
Oct•01
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NJ
ND
Apr-02
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NJ
ND
Oct-02
NR
5.0
ND
5,8
NM
NJ
ND
Apr-03
NR
50
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
Oct-03
NR
5,0
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
Apr-04
NR
5,0
ND
ND
NNI
NJ
ND
Oct-04
NR
5.0
N➢
ND
NM
NJ
ND
Apr-05
NR
5.0
ND
ND
NM
NJ
ND
Oct-05
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
NJ
ND
20-Apr-06
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
19-Oct-06
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
----1
25-Apr�07
0.15
1
D.31 J
0.48
J NM
NJ
ND
Resample
10-Jul-07
0.15
1
ND
ND
NM
NJ
0.39 J
NUB- 0 36 µ�1(05111111)
17-Oct-07
0.2
1.0
ND
ND
NM
N1
ND
/
Z3eApr48
026
L()
_
0,52 J
NS
NM
NJ
ND
/
Restunpie
II-Jun-08
0.26
IA
_
L5
NS
NM
NJ
ND
Resample
16-Jul-08
026
1.0
ND
NS
NM
NJ
0.60 J
23-Oct-08
0.26
1.0
ND
NS
Dry
Dry
ND
17-Apr-09
0.26
1,1)
J
NS
ND
Dry
ND
15-Oct-09
0.26
LD
.0.38-;
( 0.69, J
Dry
ND
ND
ND
23-Apr-10
0.26
LO
t ND
Dry
ND
Dry
ND
Methylene Chloride
15-Oct-09
0.97
2.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5 J
NC2B- NE µg/L (05/01/07)
23-Apr-10
0.97
2.0
ND
Dry
ND
Dry
ND
Methane
Oct-03
NR
NR
NM
3100
NM
NJ
NA
Apr-04
NR
NR
NM
2500
NM
NJ
NA
Oct-04
NR
t
NM
2900
NM
NI
ND
Apr-05
NR
l
NM
210
NM
NI
NA
Oct-05
Nk
1
NM
2300
NM
NI
ND
20-Apr-06
NR
2
NM
2090
NM
NI
NA
19-Oct-06
NR
10
NM
3270
NM
NI
NA
25-Apr-07
NR
50
NM
1980
NM
NI
ND
NC2B=NE µ0. (0510V07)
17-Oc1-07
5
26
NM
7070
NM
NJ
ND
23-Apr-08
NR
NR
NM
NS
NM
Ni
NA
23-Oct-08
NR
NR
NM
NS
Dry
Dry
18DD
17-Apr 09
NR
NR
NM
NS
ND
Dry
NA
15-Oct-09
NR
NR
NM
Dry
NM
NM
NA
23-Apr-10
NR
NR
NM
Dry
NM
Dry
NA
Notes
1. SMP-I 6 1 ..wd ssnmedimel)do.-am of the last scdimrnt pond.
2. RL- Reporting Limrt(= Pace Incorporated reporting Imrrts tot Februen' 1994 - Febman 1"5, Hydmgogie, Inc. reporting limits for September 1"5 • Fcbmu 1996, ErtyireTeeh hfid-Adiesuc
Laborwone9 docction lunits for September 1996 - April 1999. Central Virginia Laboratories and Consultants. Inc- detceuen limits for September I999, Spminhzcd Msaya, Inc, deuelion limits for Apnl
1999. NC PQL for September I n99 - October 2006, and NC SWSL (or lowerI April 2007 to present).
3. ND -Not dawted abarc the laboratory' mponmS limit IFebrum) 1994 - October 2006). Not dctmted above the laboraton. dcicetion Iimu (April 2t107 to present).
4. J - Estimated •alue smec thr concentration is below the laboratory's q,nouratioa limit.
B - Reposed value suspected to represent blank contamination
6, NC 2B Standard - North Ca Iina 213 Surface Water Standards. The surface waers at the sampling locations are classified at Freshwater Aquatic Life and Trout Waters.
7. NC 2B Standmd+EPA National Criteria are uud to define concentration limits for constituents.
S. SKIP-2 has not ban sampled sincc April 2009 due to construction sctirniea and menimnng point burial.
9. NM - Surface water point wan not mon tomd.
10_ NS - Not sampled.
IL NA - Not afable.
12. NI - Not instalkd,
13. Dry- Monitoring point considered to be dry.
14. NE- Not establishrd.
V
C � �
Transylvania Count) Woodruff Landfill l,) 1�� Page 9 of 9 Joycc Engineering, Inc

Mr. Jeff Brookshire
Solid Waste Director
500 Howell Road
Brevard, North Carolina 28712'
Dear Mr. Brookshire:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
((� Alan W. Klimek P E Director
Division of Wate i Quality
L
IMarch 22, 2006MAR 2 4 200fi
I
WATER QUALITY SECTION
;HEVILLE REUC'�AL C`fl_
Subject: .NPDES Stormwater General Permit
NCG120000 Application —
Woodruff Landfill
Application Return (Return 41115)
Transylvania County
The Division of Water Quality's Stormwater Permuting Unit received an application for coverage under
the above NPDES General Stormwater Permit on February 8, 2006. After discussions with the
Asheville Regional Office staff and you, we determined this site is already covered under Certificate of
Coverage (COC) # NCG 120070.
The Notice of Intent (NOI) application is being returned to you with this letter. Because the check for
$80.00 had already been processed, reimbursement for this fee will follow this letter. If you have any
questions, or do not receive that reimbursement in 30 days, please contact Sarah Young at (919) 7337
5083, extension 502.
erely,
Bethany . Georgoulia
Environmental Engineer
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Enclosed: application materials
1, r, Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportun4lAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper

Mchael.F-,Earle Goern�or
William G- Ross Jr., 5ecrelar""' l
North Carolina Department of ontiti WKJimNa rIlDirecti
sourcea, 's
" Division Wa r Yafit
Asheville Regional Office
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION ,
March 21, 2006
Mr. Jeff Brookshire
Transylvania County
500 Howell Road
Brevard, North Carolina 28712
SUBJECT- Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Transylvania County Landfill
Stormwater Management
Permit No: NCG120070
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Brookshire:
Attached you will find the report resulting from the Stormwater Compliance
Evaluation Inspection conducted by Laurie Moorhead and me on March 17, 2006. We
were impressed by the management of stormwater occurring at the Transylvania
County's Woodruff Landfill. Our only recommendation is that you should record the
results of quanitative and qualitative monitoring.
During the inspection I mentioned sealing the secondary containment structure
which encloses the fuel storage tank. I have since learned that a concrete block wall
should be water tight as is. If the structure is not holding rain water then that should serve
as your indicator that it, in fact, needs sealing.
We appreciate all of the effort that Ronnie Leonard is making to control erosion
and stormwater runoff at the landfill. Thank you for taking the time to show us around.
Should you have need to discuss this inspection, we encourage you to call us at 828-296-
4500.
ncerely,
1
RoynMvis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Laurie Moorhead .
NPS-ACO Unit
Central Files
C Asheville Files
NCG 120070G overLetter.06
NOne hCarohna
J1 �rttrrrrtll f
2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778 Telephone: {828) 296-4500 Fax:.[phone] Customer Service 1 877 623-6748

United States Environmentat Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, ❑.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires B-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 11a1 2 =1 31 HCG12G070 111 121 0?c;;;3/17 1 17 113I CI 191 S1 20Lj
Remarks
211Ill I1111I1I IIIIIIIL_III_II.1II1III IIII11I1IIIIIII6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------- -------- -------- Reserved ---------- ----------
67 169 70151 711 1 72111 I 73I I !j 74 751 1 1 I 1 -1-1 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
ri16 !1?
03/06/13
Transylvania County Landfill.
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Sao towel, etc]
Rrevarc MC
11:i;a !• 061/03/17
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)fritles(s)lPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
111,11 SaGa-_,,St}a 'r!ow.Gll Rd Przvarcl NC 28714,`A-iz'ector cf Solid
waste /S28-364-62 0%E20-Tj 445ofi Na
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program N Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Insp'ecclo/r((ss)) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
�f /
Royh! Nav ��3C3ti�`.""'O-3
Laurie T. Moorhead � h ARO WQ,'/8?8-211G-450G z....46C:1
�Qii,ut �Oc� c
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer AgencylOfficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

y
NPDFS
yrlmolday
3I ZjCGi20i;?0 111 12I ;i6l03!1.7 j 17
Inspection Type
181(,1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional' sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
We were very impressed with the management of stormwater taking place at the Woodruff Landfill. The
landfill is served by an exellent system for collecting leachate for ultimate transportation by tanker to the City
of Brevard. We would ask that a written record be maintained of all quantitative and qualitative monitoring.
Page # 2

. . M4
Permit: NCG120070
Inspection Date: 0311712006
owner - Facility: Transylvania County Landfill
inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
(if the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special. conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all.areas for inspection?
Comment:
Page # 3

Re: NCG 120070 and NCG 120079
Subject: Re: NCG120070 and NCG120079
From: Bethany Georgoulias <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:01:41 -0500
To: Roy Davis <Roy.Davis@ncmaiLnet>
CC: Sarah Young <[e-mail]>
Thanks for clarifying, Roy. I'll have Sarah return the package.
-BG
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
NC DENR DWQ
Stormwater Permitting Unit
[phone], ext. 529
bethanv . Qecrcloul ias@ncmai l . net
Roy Davis wrote:
Stop the press! So far as Laurie Moorhead and I can determine, the Division has
already issued a stormwater permit for this landfill. That permit being
NCG120070. Take a look in BIMS for our inspection report. Roy Davis
Roy Davis - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 3/20/2006 9:06 AM

NOl from Woodruff Landfill
Subject: NOI from Woodruff Landfill
From: Bethany Georgoulias<[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:59:31 -0500
To: Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
Hi Roy,
We received an NOI from Woodruff Landfill (Transylvania Co.) for coverage under
NCG120079. They discharge stormwater to Woodruff Branch, a Class C-Tr stream in the
French Broad basin.
The NOI is attached. Does the Asheville Regional Office have any concerns
with issuing a COC to this facility? If we don't receive any objections in 30 days,
we plan to issue the COC.
Thanks,
BG
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
NC DENR DWQ
Stormwater Permitting Unit
[phone], ext. 529
bethany.georgouliasoncmail.net
NCG 120079_NOI.
Content -Type: application/pdf
Content -Encoding: base64
0mrli$A04SYkdAN1X ao
L
1 of 1 3/10/2006 12:46 PM

02f0,-2006 09:24 FAX [phone] TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY lih001
FOR AGENCY US£ ONLY
Dare Recmtd
Ycar month Day
' - Division of Water Quality / Water Quality Section
.1�•tertffltatr of Ca eMize
i� National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System cr,V,
®��rk" un:
i„-.:+orr�.• -.+e w nn.� at.o..+coPermit kmaaAed R
NOT]CE OF INTENT
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under Ge ra PrI,,r
NCG 12001IU:-
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as, -
Landfills that are permitted by the North Carolina Division of Waste Management under the
provisions and requirements of North Carolina General Statute 130A - 294
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
Stormwater discharges from open dumps, hazardous waste disposal sites, or discharge of waste (including
leachate) to the waters of the state.
(Please print or type)
i) Mailing address- of ownerloperator:
Name Jrfr :9rboksh;r"_•- S d1 p jg,,I &;r_tcf'nr
Street Address S00 I& I, (I fzad.�P
City State _A[C ZIP Code
Telephone No. � � Q30 Fax: 2 - 273, q_V8 _ _
Address to which all permd correspondence will be mailed
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address -JgJE '2 9-aY _s y-
_
City State ZIP Code
County
Telephone No. 92$_ S$_.'1- 61030 J Fax. 322� 277 .-1s�-08
3) Physical Location Information:
_ . Please provide a.narrative.descriptlon-of-how to get. to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Fro," uL 4kkTHbry4`( +r c rj. IiDeuy, 14 mdcy
tljq-Aw)4rq if detfic +h _--rl �tL--t nw ,r �� !'�IwTil. /,&. xifrr irce -i! lir%r C Qssr'.1 .
(A copy of a county map or USGS quad street with facility clearly located on the map is required to be etbmiticd Witn this eppilcatton)
4) This NPDF-S Permit Application applies to which of the following
❑ New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
® Existing
S) Standard Industrial Classification_ rn
�' '
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary l z riaig
activity at this facility °'. -�
SIC Code: LL_ q3 -4
19.
c
Page 1 of 3
=� I
SWU-227-101701

02✓081'2008 09:24 FAX 8843I TRANSYLVANIA COLINTY �002
NCGI20000 N_0.1,
6) Provide a brief narrative description of the types of industrial activities and products manufactured at
this facility:
7) Discharge points I Receiving waters:
Flow many discharge points (ditches. pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater from the property?
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek. stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
discharges end up in? Wp�_,.-A� Qr-_ .,. +. A,If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
8) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
19 No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
9) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
10) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No
® Yes
It yes, please briefly describe: Wgo jT i,jp J.4 'Ma -±tiles.
�t S flS ��i •�n 5 Q.i �ceol: n� ita� rnni�..l [.�+f�N_[7�,. : •, ram. n ... c—�����1 �c [ a.: ���a%Yi�_
11) Roes this facility have a 5tormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
12) Are vehicle maintenance activities occurring at this facility?
❑ No 19yes
13) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Wesfe Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
0 No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
IN No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
® No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste: r-
How is material stored:
Page 2 of 3
SWu-227-101701

0?/68/2008 08;24 FAX [phone] TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY zou
NCG120000 N_O.I_
Where Is material stored: —
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor:=
Vendor address: —
14) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification In any application, record, report,
plan or other document Ned or required to be rnaintalrted under Article 21 or regulations of the Envannment.al
Management Commission implementing that Article, or who tal9ifies, tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any
recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a
fine not to exceed $10.000. or by imprisonment not to exceed stir months, or by troth, i18 U.S.C. Section tool provides
a punishment by a fine of not more than 5 10. 000 or imprisonment not more than 5 yearS, or bosh, for a Similar offense.)
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit- I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable In the same manner as an
individual permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such Information Is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing:
Title: 5.L.[_ l,J— rit 1?!rr-t2rr
Applicant)
(Date lgned)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $80.00 made payable to:
NCDENR
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
® Check for $80 made payable to NCDENR
® This completed application and all supporting documents
® Copy of county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility clearly merited on reap
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1617
N ote
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
Page 3 of 3
SWU-227-101701

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, Director
June 13, 2003
Mr. Will Sagar — Director of Solid Waste
500 Howell Road
Brevard. North Carolina 28712
Subject
Dear Mr. Sagar:
General Permit No. NCG 120000
Transylvania County Landfill
COC NCG120070
Transylvania County
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on March 10, 2003, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES
general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental
Protection agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended). .
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual
permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the
Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required
by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ken Pickle at telephone number
[phone] ext. 584.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
SWU-259-0] 1001
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

N
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG120000
r� CEBT 1FiCATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG120070
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Transylvania County
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Transylvania County Landfill
500 Howell Road
Brevard, North Carolina
Transylvania County
to receiving waters designated as Woodruff Branch, a class C Tr water in the French Broad River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, 11, III,
IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG120000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective June 13, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day June 13, 2003. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
Alan W_ Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

••To
my
ter �ffj � � t >, .a "1 f y.^� '• + .ir itJj
t A r � ! � i � 'Yf� • t
f "r � • ti-..s�: j �.�s \ f� � �.- _ ea t `4 fi ` (ff 1' � .�-.✓"y,,s. � r_'+�,� � i! I:
f �' ! C _ '�° �'r•,! f r -_� —vs,_._., _iY i`_ ���j_r��.r.
q Co
r' y10
s
10,
EXI r•ti
`r. ! �•�� '\ ��.,,� � �
ZtL
" - •- .�. `-Inline Basin
. r
..�� � �' J �� i � { `�!� lac f_� � E � j f � � ° � %� � �� jF `fir- ��``•-�.r �� ��� i .._ ��,,. �

(d) Fires that occur at a MSWLF require verbal notice to the Division within 24 hours and written
notification shall be submitted within 15 days
(6) Access and safety requirements.
(a) The MSWLF shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains, berms, fences and other
security measures approved by the Division to prevent unauthorized entry.
(b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is open for public use to ensure
compliance with operational requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be ofal I -weather construction and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dust control measures shall be implemented when necessary,
(e) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours during which the site is open for
public use. the permit number and other pertinent information specified in the permit conditions
shall be posted at the site entrance.
(f) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste can be received.
(g) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to promote an orderly traffic pattern to and
from the discharge area and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(h) The removal ofsolid waste from a MSWLF is prohibited unless the owner or operator approves �
and the removal is not performed on the working face.
(i) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty and perforated sufficiently to
ensure that no liquid or hazardous waste is contained therein, except fiber drums containing
asbestos.
(7) Erosion and sedimentation control requirements.
(a) Adequate sediment control measures (structures or devices), shall be utilized to prevent silt from
leaving the MS WI.I' facility.
(b) Adequate sediment control measures (structures or devices). shall be utilised to prevent excessive
on -site erosion.
(c) Provisions for a vegetative ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion must be accomplished
within 30 working days or 120 calendar days upon completion of any phase of MSWLF
development.
(8) Drainage control and water protection requirements.
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
(c) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(d) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to discharge. An NPDES permit may
be required prior to the discharge of leachate to surface waters.
(e) MSWLF units shall not:
(i) Cause a discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States, including wetlands, that
violates any requirements of the Clean Water Act. including, but not limited to. the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPD1 S) requirements. pursuant to
Section 402.
(ii) Cause the discharge of a nonpoint source of'pollution to waters of the United States,
including wetlands, that violates any requirement of an area -wide or State-wide water
quality management plan that has been approved under Section 208 or 3 19 of the Clean
Water Act. as amended.
(9) Liquids restrictions.
(a) Bulk or non -containerized liquid waste may not be placed in MSWLF units unless:
(i) The waste is household waste other than septic waste and waste oil-, or
(ii) The waste is leachate or gas condensate derived from the MSWLF unit, whether it is a
new or existing MSWLF unit or lateral expansion, is designed with a composite liner
and leachate collection system as described within Rule .1624 of this Section.
(b) Containers holding liquid wastes may not be placed in the MSWLF unit unless:
(i) The container is a small container similar in size to that normally found in household
waste:
(ii) The container is designed to hold liquids for use other than storage; or
(iii) The waste is household waste.
(c) For the purpose of this Paragraph:

(10)
(12)
(i) Liquid waste means any waste material that is determined to contain "free liquids" as
defined by Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test), S.W. 846.
(ii) Gas Condensate means the liquid generated as a result of gas recovery processes at the
MSWLF unit.
Recordkeeping requirements.
(a) The owner or operator of a MSWLF unit must record and retain at the facility, or an alternative
location near the facility approved by the Division, in an operating record the following
information as it becomes available:
(i) Inspection records, waste determination records, -and -training -procedures _required -in
Item (1) of this Rule;
(i i) Amounts by weight of solid waste received at the facility to include source of
generation:
(iii) Gas monitoring results and any remediation plans required by Item (4) of this Rule;
(iv) Any demonstration, certi hi ca I ion , finding, monitoring, testing, or analytical data required
by Rules . 1630 thru .1637 of this Section:
(v) Any monitoring; testing, or analytical data as required by Rule .1627 of this Section; and
(vi) Any cost estimates and financial assurance documentation required by Rule .1628 of this
Section.
(b) All information contained in the operating record must be furnished upon request to the Division
or be made available at all reasonable times for inspection by the Division.
(c) The owner or operator must maintain a copy of the operation plan required by Rule ,1625 ofthis
Section at the facility.
Spreading and Compacting requirements.
(a) MSWLF units shall restrict solid waste into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(c) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be providcd within the area to confine ine solid
waste subject to be blown by the wind. At the conclusion ofeach day of operation. all windblown
material resulting from the operation shall be collected and returned to the area by the owner or
operator.
Lcachate management plan. The owner or operator ofa MS WLF unit designed with a leachate collection
system must establish and maintain a leachate management plan which, at a minimum, includes the
following;
(a) Periodic maintenance of the leachate collection system;
(b) Maintaining records for the amounts of leachate generated;
(c) Semi-annual leachate quality sampling;
(d) Approval for final leachate disposal; and
(e) A contingency plan for extreme operational conditions.
Hislory Note: Awhorily G.S. 130A-294
Aff, Ocroher 9, 1993,

,15A NCAC 13B.1626 %OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MSWLF FACILITIES
The owner or operator of any MSWLF unit must maintain and operate the facility in accordance with the requirements set
forth in this Rule and the operation plan as described in Rule .1625 of this Section.
(1) Waste Acceptance and Disposal Requirements.
(a) A MSWLF shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to receive. The landfill
owneror operator shall notify the Division within 24 hours of attempted disposal of any waste the
landfill is not permitted to receive, including waste from outside the area the landfill is permitted
to serve.
(b) The following wastes are prohibited from disposal at a MSWLF unit:
(i) Hazardous waste as defined within 15A NCAC 13A. to also include hazardous waste
from conditionally exempt small quantity generators.
(ii) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) wastes as defined in 40 CFR 761.
(iii) Liquid wastes unless they are managed in accordance with Rule. 1626(9) of this Section.
(c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste. and other animal waste delivered
to the disposal site shall be covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste shall be managed in accordance with 40 CFR 61, which is hereby incorporated by
reference including any subsequent amendments and additions. Copies of 40 CI�R 61 are
available for inspection at the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Solid Waste, 401 Oberlin Road, Raleigh, N.C. at no cost. The waste shall be covered
immediately with soi I in a manner that will not cause airborne conditions and must be disposed of
separate and apart from other solid wastes:
(i) At the bottom of the working face; or
(ii) In an area not contiguous with other disposal areas. Separate areas shall be clearly
designated so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activities.
(c) Wastewater treatment sludges may only be accepted for disposal in accordance with the following
conditions:
(i) Utilized as a soil conditioner and incorporated into or applied onto the vegetative growth
layer but, in no case greater than six inches in depth.
(ii) Co -disposed if the facility meets all design requirements contained within Rule .1624,
and approved within the permit, or has been previously approved as a permit condition.
(f) Owners or operators of all MSWLF units must implement a program at the facility for detecting
and preventing the disposal of hazardous and liquid wastes. This program must include, at a
minimum:
(i) Random inspections of incoming loads or other comparable procedures;
(ii) Records of any inspections;
(iii) Training of facility personnel to recognize hazardous and liquid wastes; and
(iv) Development ofa contingency, plan to properly manage any identified hazardous and
liquid wastes. The plan must address identification, removal, storage and final
disposition of the waste.
(g) Waste placement at existing MSWLI= units shall meet the following criteria:
(i) Waste placement at existing MSWLF units not designed and constructed with a base
liner system approved by the Division shall be within the areal limits of the actual waste
boundary established prior to October 9, 1993 and in a manner consistent with the
effective permit.
(ii) Waste placement at existing MSWLF units designed and constructed with a base liner
system permitted by the Division prior to October 9, 1993 and approved for operation by
the Division shall be within the areal limits of the base liner system and in manner
consistent with the effective permit.
(2) Cover material requirements.
(a) Except as provided in (2)(b) of this Paragraph, the owners or operators of all NIS WLF units must
cover disposed solid waste with six inches ofearthcn material at the end ofeach operating day, or
at more frequent intervals i f necessary. to control disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and
scavenging.
(b) Alternative materials of an alternative thickness (other than at least six inches of earthen material)
may be approved by the Division it' the owner or operator demonstrates that the alternative

material and thickness control disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and scavenging without
presenting a threat to human health and the environment. A MSWLI- owner or operator may
apply for a generic approval of an alternative cover material, which would extend to al I M S W LF
units.
(c) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for 12 months or more, but where
final termination of disposal operations has not occurred, shall be covered with a minimum of one
foot of intermediate cover.
(3) Disease vector control.
(a) Owners or operators of all MSWLF units must prevent or control on_sitc_populations ofdisease
vectors using techniques appropriate for the protection of human health and the environment.
(b) For purposes of this Item, "disease vectors" means any rodents, flies. mosquitoes, or other
animals, including insects, capable of transmitting disease to humans.
(4) Bxplosive gases control.
(a) Owners or operators of all MSWLF units must ensure that:
0) The concentration of methane gas generated by the facility does not exceed 25 percent
of the lower explosive limit for methane in facility structures (excluding gas control or
recovery system components); and
(ii) The concentration of methane gas does not exceed the lower explosive limit for methane
at the facility property boundary.
(b) Owners or operators of all M S WLF units must implement a routine methane monitoring program
to ensure that the standards of (4)(a) are met. A permanent monitoring system shall be
constructed on or before October 9, 1994. A temporary monitoring system shall be used prior to
construction of' the permanent system.
(i) The type and frequency of monitoring must be determined based on the following
factors:
(A) Soil conditions;
(B) The hydrogeologic conditions surrounding the facility;
(C) The hydraulic conditions surrounding the facility; and
(D) The location of facility structures and property boundaries.
(ii) The minimum frequency of monitoring shall be quarterly.
{c} I I'methane gas levels exceeding the limits specified in (4)(a) are detected, the owner or operator
must:
0) Immediately take all necessary steps to ensure protection ofhuman health and notify the
Division,
(ii) Within seven days of'detection. place in the operating record the methane gas levels
detected and a description of the steps taken to protect human health: and
(iii) Within 60 days of detection, implement a remediation plan for the methane gas releases,
place a copy of the plan in the operating record, and notify the Division that the plan has
been implemented. The plan shall describe the nature and extent of the problem and the
proposed remedy.
(iv) Based on the need for an extension demonstrated by the operator, the Division may
establish alternative schedules for demonstrating compliance with (4)(c)(h) and (iii) of
this Rule,
(d) For purposes of this Item, "lower explosive limit" means the lowest percent by volume of a
mixture of explosive gases in air that will propagate a flame at 25°C and atmospheric pressure.
(5) Air Criteria.
(a) Owners or operators of all MSWLFs must ensure that the units do not violate any applicable
requirements developed under a State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved or promulgated by the
U.S. EPA Administrator pursuant to Section 110 of the Clean Air Act. as amended.
(b) Open burning of solid waste, except for the infrequent burning of land clearing debris generated
on site or debris from emergency clean-up operations, is prohibited at all MSWLF units. Any
such infrequent burning must be approved by the Division.
(c) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or arrangements shall be made with the
local fire protection agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when needed.

SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER FIELD PARAMETERS
Parameter
Date
Bsc
Nrouud
Down gradient
MW-3 I1tW-IO
hIW-I h1W.2 MW4 h14VS h1%V_6 MW-7 NIW-8 h1W-9S h1W-911 hIW-II NIW-125 AIW-12D
AIW-13
pll
Feb-94
5.30
NI
5.10
3.00
4,30
4.20
NI
NI
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
NI
NI
Aug-94
5.40
NI
540
5.00
5.50
5.40
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
Feb-95
3.70
NI
5.10
5.50
5,00
5.40
5.10
6,00
5.00
NJ
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
Scp-93
5.52
NI
5.28
5.46
5,62
5.49
5.76
5,09
5.43
NI
NS
NI
NI
NI
NI
Fe696
6.60
NJ
6.40
6.00
7.40
7,10
6.50
6,40
6,40
NI
NI
N1
NI
NI
NI
Ocr-96
5.64
NI
5.54
5.67
5.54
6,14
5.88
5.35
5.72
NI
NI
Ni
NJ
NI
N1
May-97
5.49
NI
5.28
5.17
3.38
5.55
5.11
5.01
5.26
NJ
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
Oct-97
5.53
NI
5.33
3.21
5.39
5.46
5.17
4.96
5.41
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
NI
NI
Apr-98
644
NI
6.84
5.63
5.99
6.12
5.80
6,04
5.48
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
Ni
NI
Oci-98
5.36
NI
5.18
- 4,40
4.02
3.85
4.10
4.02
6.02
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
NI
Apr-99
5.56
NI
5.20
5.12
5.31
5.74
3.23
529
5.68
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NJ
NI
Oct-99
6.W
NI
6.10
6.38
6.62
7.43
7.79
6,12
6.65
NI
NI
N1
NI
NI
N1
Apr-00
6.16
NI
5-59
5.42
6,70
687
6.26
6.38
6.09
NI
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NI
Oct-00
6,08
NJ
532
5.19
5.60
5,19
3.40
5.24
5.55
NI
NI
NJ
NJ
NI
NJ
Resample
Jan-01
NS
NI
NS
6.31
NS
NS
NS
N.S
NS
NI
NI
NJ
NI
NI
NI
Apr-01
5.92
NI
5.79
5.68
6.94
600
7.19
6,56
5,98
5,87
5.86
NI
NI
NI
NI
Resample
Jun-01
NS
NJ
NS
NS
6,63
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NI
NI
NI
NI
Oct-01
5,64
NI
4,92
4,94
5.95
5.29
4.84
513
5.46
5.33
6.25
NI
NI
NI
NJ
Apr-02
5.79
N1
5.26
5.07
6.29
5165
5.12
5.54
5.63
5.36
6,23
N1
NI
NI
NI
Oct-02
6.23
NI
4.90
4.80
AB
5,09
5.51
AB
5.52
5.86
6.18
NJ
NI
NI
NI
Apr-03
4.94
NJ
4,91
4.65
AB
1,01
634
All
5.42
5.47
5.95
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
Oct-03
6.04
NJ
546
5.44
AD
5.03
5.83
AD
331
5.73
5.84
NJ
NJ
NI
NJ
Apr-04
5.42
NI
5.11
5.13
AB
5.57
5,45
AB
S.99
641
6.16
NI
NJ
NI
NJ
Oct-04
54R
NI
SA7
6,06
AD
5.76
5.23
AB
5.54
5.15
5.99
Nl
NI
NI
NI
Apr-05
5,15
Nl
5.63
5.41
AD
5,41
5.68
AB
5.57
5.05
6.53
NJ
NI
N1
NI
Oct,05
6.12
NI
6.26
5.59
A➢
5.51
5.58
AD
5.89
5.60
6.55
NI
NI
NI
NI
19-Apr-06
.168
NJ
5.80
5,39
AB
5.52
4.96
AB
5.30
5.04
5.93
NI
NI
NI
Ni
Resample
08-3un-06
NS
NJ
5.97
NS
A➢
4.68
NS
AB
NS
NS
NS
NI
NI
NI
N1
19-Oct-06
5.14
NI
5.48
5,62
AB
5.13
436
AB
5.19
5.01
6.21
NI
NI
NI
NI
Resample
29-Nov-06
NS
NS
NS
NS
AB
5.75
NS
AB
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
25-Apr-07
149
6.48
5.27
5,24
AB
5.67
5,23
All
5.41
5,27
5.99
6.50
5.32
5.42
5.74
Resample
10-Jul-07
NS
6.64
5,79
NS
AD
NS
NS
AD
NS
NS
NS
6.28
5.90
6,29
6.72
17-Oct.07
50
NS
5.73
5.50
AB
5.52
Dry
AH
5,40
5.45
6.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
Resample
28-Nuv07
NS
NS
5.80
5A7
AB
5.48
NS
AB
5.76
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
12-Mar-08
NS
5.71
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
NS
5.62
5.33
5.45
5A5
23-Apr-08
5.56
6.43
5.42
5.20
AB
3.60
5.47
AB
5.32
5.36
6.44
5.68
5.52
5.66
5,67
23-Oct-08
4.92
6AP
4.90
4.94
AB
5.61
NA
All
5.16
4.76
NS
6.01
4.53
5.57
5,45
Resample
14-Jan-09
NS
NS
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
AD
NS
5,59
NS
5.26
5.33
NS
N5
17-Apr-09
5.33
5.87
4.75
4.84
AD
5.22
4.93
AB
3.00
5.31
5.85
5.04
5.08
5.00
5.16
Resample
28-May-09
NS
NS
6.71
NS
AB
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
IS-Oct-09
6.39
6.21
5.20
538
AB
5.21
5.24
All
561
5.37
6.u8
5.42
559
5.49
5.01
23-Apr-10
5.49
5.78
4.96
4,97
AB
5.61
5.29
AD
5.59
5.77
5.84
5,28
5.37
5.18
5.58
Resample
II-Jun-10
NS
NS
5.39
NS
AB
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
NS
NS
5,63
NS
NS
28-0ct-10
7.20
7.53
5.25
5.46
AB
5.54
5.29
AB
6,10
5.52
6.60
5.90
5.98
6.21
6,12
Resample
21-Dk 10
NS
NS
NS
NS
AB
NS
NS
AB
NS
5.10
NS
NS
5.62
NS
NS
Average
5.71:
6.30
SAB
5.31
5.79
5.54
5.53
5.54
5,60
5.40
6.13
5.70
5,43
S.M
5.66
Transylvania County Woodruff Landfill Page 1 of 4 Joyce Engineering, Inc.

A A tin V� §h p�
O G O O O O O O
Feb-94
Jul-94
Dec-94
A

SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETERS
Parameter
Date
SMP-1
SMP-2
SNF-3
SMP4
H
Fen-94
5.60
NI
NM
NJ
Aug-94
6.10
NI
NM
N1
Feb-95
5.80
NI
NM
NI
Sep-95
6.58
NI
NM
NI
Feb-96
NA
NJ
NM
NI
Oct-96
6.20
NJ
NM
NJ
May-97
6.53
NI
NM
NJ
Oct-97
6.70
NI
NM
NI
Ap,98
6.72
NI
NM
NJ
00-98
Dry
NI
NM
NI
Apr-99
6.31
NI
NM
NI
oa-99
7.89
NI
NNI
Nl
Apr-00
7.39
VI
NM
NI
00-00
5.74
Ni
NM
14l
Apr-01
6.19
NI
NM
NJ
Oa-01
5.89
NI
NM
NI
Apr-02
6-09
NI
NM
NI
Oa-02
5.%
5A9
NM
NI
Apr-03
SS9
5.29
NM
NI
Oa-03
4.80
5.60
NM
NI
Apr-04
5.96
6.23
NM
N]
Oa-04
6.08
5.21
NM
NJ
Apr-05
6.56
6.22
NM
NI
Rrs"lc
Jun-05
3.00
NS
NM
NI
0a-05
650
6.14
NM
Ni
19-Apr-06
6.87
5.94
N'M
N)
19.0n46
638
5.53
NM
M
25-Apr-07
6.11
5.92
NM
NJ
Rmmuplc
10-Ju"7
6.05
6.24
NM
NI
17-0ct-07
6.43
6.48
NM
NI
23-Apr-08
6 20
NS
NM
NI
Rmmple
11-ImM
7.20
NS
JIM
NI
Pe 2mplc
t6•Jul-08
6A0
NS
Nlaf
N1
23-Oct-08
5.81
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
5.94
NS
146
Dry
15-0a-09
5.99
NS
8AI
6.41
23-Apr-10
5.59
Dry
5.54
Dry
284pa-10
6.90
NS
6.94
NS
ResuWk
21-Dce-10
5.63
NS
NS
NS
Averapc
626
-
-
-
Corduaiv"
Feb-94
29
NI
NM
NI
VS)
Aq-94
32
NI
NM
NI
Fcb-95
--
NJ
NM
NI
Scp-95
60.2
N1
NM
N1
Fcb46
NA
NI
NM
NJ
0c1-96
50
NI
NM
NI
May-97
23.5
Ni
NM
NI
Oa-97
70
NI
NM
NI
Apr-98
16
NJ
NM
NJ
Oa-98
Dry
NI
NM
NJ
Apr-99
60.6
NJ
NM
NJ
Ott-99
113
NI
NM
NJ
Apr-00
6.8
NI
NM
NI
Oct-00
13.9
NI
NM
Ni
Apr-01
72.6
NI
NM
NI
pct-OI
35.7
NJ
NM
N)
Aprd12
98
NJ
NM
NJ
Oct-02
I13.2
116.0
NM
NI
Apr-03
118.1
148.0
NM
NI
per-03
132.9
55.3
NM
NI
Apr-04
79.5
102.4
NM
NI
Qa-04
92
104.9
NM
NI
Ayr-05
211
65.7
NM
NJ
RmanVk
J-05
133-7
NS
NM
NI
0a-05
101.8
78.7
NM
NI
19-Apr-06
54
22.0
NM
NJ
19-Oct-06
124.00
74.00
NM
NI
25-Apr07
80-2
93.7
NM
NI
Raarrrple
10-Jul-07
82.8
90.9
NM
Nl
17-pct-07
91.0
109.6
NM
NI
23-Apr4B
142.5
NS
NM
NJ
Rrsarriple
11-Ju"S
146.5
NS
NM
NI
Rw=pk
16-1u1-08
125.5
NS
NM
NI
23-Oa-08
96.9
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
19il
NS
M26
Dry
15-0ct-09
198
NS
41.7
21.0
23-Apr-10
39.8
Dry
20.7
Dry
28-0a-10
138.0
NS
55.9
NS
R-!
21-Dec-10
91.8
NS
NS
NS
7r 71- t'-Y W-� t.rrean PW 1 of ^ 1.�- Env.- & 6c.

SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETERS
Parvmerer
bale
SMP-1
SNIP-2
5MP-3
SNIP-4
arpemture
Feb-94
10
N11
NM
M
(degrees C)
Aug-94
17
NS
NM
Nl
Feb-95
11
NI
NM
Ni
Sep-95
20.3
N1
NM
M
Fcb-96
NA
NI
NM
NI
Oa-96
15.0
NI
NM
NI
May-97
19.5
NI
NM
NI
Oct-97
17.4
N1
NM
Ni
Apr-98
21.8
NI
NM
NI
Oct-98
Dry
N1
NM
NI
Ap09
19.9
NI
NM
NI
0ct-99
11.1
N1
NM
NJ
Apr-00
1219
Ni
NM
NI
()a-00
13A
NS
NM
Nl
Apr-01
14.5
NI _
NM
NI
Oa-Oi
15.3
NJ
NM
N1
Apr-02
13.3
NI
NM
N1
Oct-02
55.2
19.6
NM
NI
Apr-03
6.30
13.3
NM
NI
Oa-03
I L8
15.8
NM
NI
Apr-04
15,9
13.3
NM
Nl
Oa-04
17.1
15.2
NM
NI
Apr-05
9.9
11.2
NM
Ni
Rem,rtpk
Jut 05
21.4
NS
NM
NI
0ct45
16.9
14.8
NM
NI
19-Apr-06
14,3
14,0
NM
Ni
19-Oa-06
1&05
14.95
NM
NI
25-Apr-07
15.7
19.1
NM
NS
Rmample
10-lul-07
22.1
16.7
NM
N$
174Oct-07
14.1
14.8
NM
NI
23-Apr-08
14.6
NS
NM
NI
Rmwrrple
11-lurt-w
28.3
NS
NM
NI
Rumple
16-;."g
19.4
NS
NM
N1
23-Oa-08
10.8
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
14.8
NS
9.9
Dry
15-00-09
11.5
NS
9.3
112
23-Apr-10
14,4
Dry
10.9
Dry
28-Oa-10
17.8
NS
11.9
NS
ReswTic
21-Dec-10
5.9
NS
NS
NS
Aver.gc
15.3
-
-
-
Turtaday
Oa-96
NA
NJ
NM
NI
CNfUs)
May-97
31.7
NI
NM
NI
Oa-97
12.4
NI
NM
Nl
Apr-98
NA
NJ
NM
N3
0a-98
Dry
N1
NM
NJ
Apr-99
15.7
NF
NM
NJ
Oa-99
48.2
M
NM
Ni
Apr-00
18.9
NI
NM
NJ
Oa-00
8.35
NI
NM
Ni
Apr-01
10.9
NI
NM
NI
Oa -OF
10.3
NI
NM
NI
Apr-02
12.0
NI
NM
NI
0a-02
373
S4.7
NM
N1
Apr-03
NA
1.65
NM
Nl
O3-03
58.4
>1000
NM
Ni
Apr-04
1&0
14.1
NM
NJ
Oa-04
13.92
3.51
NM
NJ
Apr-05
83.9
327
NM
NI
Resarrrple
Im105
$0.7
N5
NM
NI
Oa-05
10.4
3.52
NM
N1
19-Apr-06
9-33
13.9
NM
N]
19-0ct-06
56.50
100.00
NM
NI
2<-Apr-07
7.99
10.72
NM
NI
Resampte
10-IuW7
52.6
25.0
NM
NZ
•
17.Om-07
191
4.07
NM'
N1
23-Apr-08
54.07
NS
NM
NI
Ra-ample
11-j 08
166
NS
NM
NI
Pe ample
16-Sul-08
12.89
NS
NM
NI
22-Oa-08
5.33
NS
Dry
Dry
17-Apr-09
60.0
NS
15.58
Dry
15.0a-09
170
NS
545
6
23-Apr-10
9,84
Dry
3.87
Dry
28-0a-IQ
55.8
NS
4.77
N5
Resampk
21-Dec-10
16.75
NS
NS
NS
Awmp
43-38
-
-
-
Nd-
1. NS - Not sa-pkd
2. NM - Nor rcgnrcd for mm=r.&
3. A0 paruaeters -= measured ar tle field
4. NA - Not -ilable.
5. Dry . Stuiace +v = rrtorurormg pumt o a klc cd to be dry.
6. NI . Nor itsmlled.
Tr>erM+'rna G-Y U-dmff Im4E11 Wee 742 byes E g..,-& IM-

r
• L
b A 1pnn In T 5 V V m
CD CD Q p UmO C. O O O
Feb-94
Jul-94
Ln
Dec-94
a,

�+ Ln
O (n O In O Un O
Feb-94
Jul-94
Dec-94
May-95
Oct-95
Mar-96
Aug-96
Jan-97
Jun-97
Nov-97
Apr-98
Sep-98
Feb-99
Jul-99
Dec-99
May-00
Oct-o0
Mar-01
Aug-01
Jan-02Lr
'Q
�
Jun-02
N ov-02
Apr-03
Sep-03
Feb-04
J u 1-04
GQ
Dec-04
(D
May-05
0cn
Oct-o5
n
Mar-Ofi
41
Aug-06
Jan-07
Jun-07
Y
Nov-07
Apr-08
Sep-08
PO
Feb-09
Jul-09
ol
Dec-09
May-10Ln
Oct-10
/

0
0
r
0
f+ N
0 0
N
0
May-97
Sep-97
Jan-98
May-98
Sep-98
Jan-99
May-99
Sep-99
Jan-00
May-00
Sep-00
Jan-01
May-01
Sep-01
Jan-02
May-02
Sep-02
Jan-03
May-03
Sep-03
Jan-04
May-04
.�
Sep-04
Jan-05
cr
May-05
Sep-05
r+
`C
Jan-06
May-06
Sep-06
"fl
Jan-07
Fi
May-07
Sep-07
Jan-08
May-08
Sep 08
Jan-09
May-09
Sep-09
Jan-10
May-10
Sep-10
Jan-11
ccLn
I
C
I
C C
a
� c
2:
a-2:
2
-Z -
m
a
m
4
Q
L
7
O
O
�
f�
1"
1
in
N
i
{
{
1
N
0 1
1
{
1
0
A

SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SURFACE WATER CONSTITUENTS
Constimcnt
Data
Concentrations Inµ IL
OL
RL
SMP-1
SMP-2
SMP-3
SMP-4
Blanks
Tolueze:
Oct-96
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
M
ND
May-97
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
NJ
ND
00-97
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Apr-98
NR
2.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Oct-98
NR
1.0
Dry
NJ
NM
NI
03 1
Apr-99
NR
0.3
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Oct-99
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Apr-00
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
Nt
ND
Oct-00
NR
5.0
ND
Nl
NM
NI
ND
Apr-0I
NR
5.0
ND
N1
NM
NI
ND
Oct-0I
NR
5.0
ND
NI
NM
NI
ND
Apr-02
NR
5.0
ND
N1
NM
NI
ND
Oct-02
NR
5.0
ND
5.3
NM
NI
ND
Apr-03
NR
5.0
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
Oct-03
NR
5.0
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
Apr-04
NR
5.0
ND
ND
N.m
NI
ND
Oct-04
NR
5.0
ND
ND
NM
Nl
ND
Apr-05
NR
5.0
ND
ND
NrM
NJ
ND
Oct-05
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
20-Apr-06
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
M
ND
19-Oct-06
NR
5
ND
ND
NM
NI
ND
25-Apr-07
0.15
1
0.31 3
0.48
1 NM
Ni
ND
Resample
10-1u1-07
0.15
1
ND
ND
Niv1
NI
0.39 1
NMB= 0.36 yq/L (05101107)
17.Oct-07
0.2
1.0
ND
ND
NM
NJ
ND
23-Apr-08
0.26
LO
0.52 1
NS
NM
NI
ND
Resample
1 Hun -OS
0.26
1.4
m IS .s>s^ ""
NS
N-M
M
ND
Resample
16-Jul-08
0.26
1.0
ND
NS
NM
NI
0.60 1
23-Oct-08
0.26
1.a
ND
NS
Dry
Dry
ND
17-Apr-09
0.26
LO
0.38 1
NS
ND
Dry
ND
15-Oct-09
0-26
1.0
0.69 1
Dry
ND
ND
• ND
23-Apr-10
0.26
IO
ND
Dry
ND
Dry
ND
28-Oct-10
0.26
1.0
0.36 1
NS
ND
NS
ND
Methylene Chloride
15-Oct-09
0.97
2.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
L5 1
NC2B-NE Ng/L (05101107)
23-Apr-10
0.97
2.0
ND
Dry
ND
Dry
ND
28-Oct-10
0.97
1.0
ND
NS
NC)
NS
21.9
Mcthanc
Oct-03
NR
NR
NM
3100
NM
to
NA
Apr-04
NR
NR
NM
2500
NM
NI
NA
Oct-04
NR
I
NM
2800
NM
NI
ND
Apr-05
NR
I
NM
210
NM
N1
NA
Oct-05
NR
I
NM
2300
NM
NI
ND
20-Apr-06
NR
2
NM
2090
NM
NI
NA
19-Oct-06
NR
10
NM
3270
NM
Ni
NA
25-Apr-07
NR
50
NM
I980
NM
NI
ND
NC2B= NE µ8/L (05101/07)
17-Oct-07
5
26
NM
7070
NM
NI
ND
23-Apr-08
NR
NR
NM
NS
NM
NI
NA
23-Oct-08
NR
NR
NNI
NS
Dry
Dry
SHOO
I7-Apr-09
NR
NR
NM
NS
ND
Dry
NA
15-Oct-09
NR
NR
NM
Dry
NM
NM
NA
23-Apr-10
NR
NR
NM
Dry
NM
Dry
NA
28-Oct-10
NR
NR
NM
NS
NM
NS
NA
Notes:
1. SMP- I is Incited i®edenely dowamvm of the leer pond
2. RL - Reporting Lime I- Pace Incorporated reporting 1i for February 1994 - February 1995. Hydrogo&, loe. reporting limes far September 1995 - Fcbnmwy 1996• E.aAmTech Mid :Atlantic Laboratories
desertion lun es fa¢ September 19%- .April 1998, Cemml Virgmis laboratories and Consultams, Inc. detection limits for September 1998, Specialized Assays, Inc. desectim limas for 4pnl 1999, NC PQL for
Septa ber 19" - October 2006. and NC S W SL (or lower) April 2007 in press}.
3. ND = Not detected about the laboratory reporting Hind (Fd v ry 1994 - Odober 2006). Not detected above the laboratory *I -One limit (April 2007 m presemY.
4. 1- FstimatM +slue since the concmmtion a below the labom[Ws gsamit+ticn linat
5. B - Reported nbae saspcted to represent: blank cootamismtion
6. NC 2B Standard - North Caml"on 2B Surface W arer Staodardc The surtac waters at the samplvg lociriom arc classified at Fresbw u Aq atk Life and Trory W uma
1. NC 2B SundanVEPA Nuioml Criteria are used to de0ne concern i limits for cotssr;<ree=r
L SW-2 bm nor bees sampled since April 200E due to cuoitnrction antiveim and monitoring pc im burial.
9. NM = Surface v m paint was out nicaucrr3
10. NS = Not sampled
11. NA=Not available
12. NI -Not i .mUed
13. Dry - Munaoring poim tbnsidered to be dry.
l4. NE - Nat mnbLisbed
Ttamylvttoks County Woodruff landfill Page 9 of 9 Joyce Engmemrinm lnc.

Nov 14 11 10-50a City of Brevard Utilities 0288846280 P-1
WATER SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
-rRANSYLVANIA COUNTY WO.ODRUFF LANDFILL
DATL OF SAM I'LL:.
TIMF OF SAMpi F .- v i 1i 3 5-
TIMI: OF SAMPILL: 112
TIML OF';AMI'LC: 4.3
DAI 1- IN I AR'
TIML IN LAW
PF-C'D ON
77-7--
WA
SAMPILL, If I
7SS
rc 12
cakform)
m
SAMPLW -([)I'ir)tL
SAM P I F R NAME' Lsjpa t u r
tA6 USE
A(TFPTED UY:
ANAI.YSIS RY:
RESULTS
df w 0
SAMPLF V-4

;-zjer?
% .o
. + q �y `
jf }
obb Z -
-an�T .��.

Transylvania County Landfill Sample Results
DATE
#1 COD",
41 TSS -
#1 FC
#2 CODS
42WS5 1
#2:KfAWIIAM
#3 COD-, --t
#3 TSS
#3 FC:.. '.... -'
Rainfall
3/25/2011
.,,., :
14
- 2"
39
18
"� %-, .
}. -9
•`. .:. �. f;2
3/31/2011
ND _
•.
- "23
-� 52
0141110111IM73
108
+}LjjjIM270
•'' • '-;'49
.�%�"'''° .- 56
� '�''-`-'200
3.5
4/12/2011
ND'. z'
°14
' - '48
ND
e1JAKII M�35
. 22
ND ', �`�.-u -
.s 8
.' - 48
0.28
4/18/2011
ND
_ 8
v- 56
MWORM.63T
MUDIRM187,
AMM19320
ND O 4i, Z,
y, -'61
'. # -' d°260
5.35
5/4/2011
ND
.12
= 46
ND
AWNWAID34
MWW4086
NO
f 52
'a 52
0,79
5/27/2011
.'." _35
1101
550
NCaMPAIM
M31110111=17
&IMM350
ND
W - -.;:11
"(`440
0.94
6/13/2011
'` -34
176
530
0611IMMM30
930KE=71
�MF=580
ND
7/26/2011
-32
_ , _ 149
600
NDUMU%M
126
>-1600
ND
- 59
.-..`` . 'r600
) 0.46
9/7/2011
" ._t= ` 28
= 13
600
ND
138
>Z600
: ^ a 75
-' - ,'" F:67
" . -; 4�- 3Z-FM
4.68
11/4/7011
.
229
- - 246
UMMM97
.340
.' ':'_•` .
s
-. _ 96�....:r214
1.1
permit benchmark
COD
TSS
Fecal
120
_ 100
: ' . "° .1,000
Wguawfm
MNXMIRFM
MMMEAM
iz,
G�
#1 Location is upstream SDO #2 Location is Basin #1,Outfall SDO 3# Location is downstream SDO

f
r
Facility: rrors. ep. /t%i.�li/ ZQri�
Date: io ".3%
Location Address: 5"pn R&"l (are✓Q 2$ /
���#
Contact Name: i-7�' 5Crk,5 �; r e�
Phone #:
Contact Mailing Address: Abc)ve—
County: TiQ�,s. /Vetn:c�
Directions:
Routine Compliance Inspection
v1
Rescission Request
Complaint Investigation
Other - Explain:
A
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Is a copy of the permit and the Certificate of Coverage available
1
at the site?
2
Is a copy of the signed and certified SWPPP at the facility?
i/
Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
3
4
Does the plan include a general location (USGS) map?
5
Does the plan include a detailed site map including outfall
locations and drainage areas?
6
Does the plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan?
(SPRP)
7
Does the plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good
Housekeeping Plan? A5
KX-eP re« 7�Z / V
/�
8
Does the plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
9
Does the Plan include a BMP Summary?
10
Does the plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
11
Has the SWPPP been implemented?
B
Monitoring and Records , ` Cy'c? cG
Yes
No
N/A
1
Does the plan include a list of significant spiq occurring during
the past 3 ears? �r^,�rLr �c?,re r �.
;.( ?ej
eo,611s Z-41f4di76 (�7
Does the facility provide and document employee training?
2
✓
1
3
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? (semi-
y
annual) (v fv y,:s AA o n. t i� 1: ice! -
� <
4
Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring? [s-a)i
a ble 3 3 Al
5
Ils the facility meeting all permit specified benchmark goals?
1o�L3�/j
6
Is the facility following the tiered response?,
NOD reGc-i
7
Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring from vehicle
AJo 60 D
Maintenance areas? 6-- a-, . [
C
Waste Management
Yes
No
N/A
141
Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment-?
IKAiL t %eLec,4 ink.: A - -2gt -kr;
2
Are current BMPs in material storage areas adequate?
&L, 'P,rp �jo 1 t'� _ '7',-
S
a- L, f-ye '�t,r . •-
N e? i m a i

3 Are appropriate spill containment and cleanup materials kept on -
site and in convenient locations?
D Outfalls Yes No N/A
1 Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
2 If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly
documented by the Division?
3 Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
E Sector specific questions Yes No N/A
1 Have zinc or copper benchmarks been exceeded in the past 3
sampling periods?
2 Have potential sources for copper and zinc been evaluated at
vour facility?
3
0
5
Comments a
4Pct. c_L�sCnriwy�a

r
so SO--
`11�� a' S
s otlZ-�a-�C�°b
N G� �1�'

3idary would want to & a system constructed that
ive a made a large inve ent herein Franklin, NC and
economy for both the Town and County.
is project and we have paid approx. $60,000.00 for this
:werLine for this project and maintain this line for one
cn turn this over to the Town and will not receive
Bacon County will be able to tie in new customers to the
date.
additional information. T will do my best to provide
n advance.

A ".
STATE 0ENORTH CAROU
Z!_
XONVENT wNA'TURAL, EtbURCES N 0
2094353'-
1 6b6 MAIL SMMC CEW R, '4
6�[Gti NORtKIC4A OLIN, 6R9,16M
paoiok No
-A�4OUNT P
13
pv
.
PAY
gh and ODI D;511ars .Tip uwl
TO THE ORDER OF
IL
TRANSYLVANIA-SWCD
203 E MORGAN.S7
BR EVA RD NC 28712
N-.Z_4"AFT.HORUZD QGNA.J�VRC-
igpp STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 2094353
DEPT. OF ENVIRCNMerr & NATURAL RGSMFICUS
16% MAN. SF_RVK,EGEU7FFR FLALF-r-*t NC Z76994WS
13ATE
VfV0MJVRrE)1T MOMU
TYRE
Cr_scR]PTION
jNV0iCEP.MCXJNr
DEDUCTtONS W
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
GIRT106
NCG120079
04070&343i'
$80m
W-00
QUEST[
)N CALL SARAm YOU N
3 Al" 91 9-7
33-7015 EXT 502.
4"
A�4
TOTALS.
pov
Q
ncv
dgl:GD 90 E2 add

TEST
Permit No.
Project Name
Type of Project
Title
First Name
Last Name
Applicant
Address
City
State
Zip
Consulting
Date Received
Acknowledgement
Payor
Fee Received
Check No.
Reg./ C. O. Dep.
Ref Due.
Ref Req_
County
Region
Reviewer
Comments
0
anitary Landfill
ump & Haul
AGAR
'RANSYLVANIA COUNTY
7. 2 BOX 525
ARE VARD
FORTH CAROLINA
8712
July 3, 1995
July 14, 1995
TransylvaniaCo
200
7410
C.O.
Transylvania
Asheville
Forest Westall
Po: Kerry Becker, Reviewer.

NON NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA 07/14/95 14:55:25
UPDATE OPTION TRXID 50U KEY 140003770
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT APP/P.ERMIT FEE—$ 200 00 REGION
FACILITY NRME> TRANSYLVANIA CO —SANITARY LAND? COUNTY> TRANSYLVANIA 01
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) ENGINEER:
STREET: RT. 2 BOX 525 STREET:
CITY: BREVARD ST NC ZIP 28712 CITY: ST ZIP 27529
TELEPHONE [phone] TELEPHONE:
STATE CONTACT> WESTALL/KB FACILITY CONTACT WILLIAM SAGRR
TYPE OF PROJECT> PUMP AND HAUL LAT: LONG:
DATE APP RCVD 07/03/95 N=NEW,M=MODIFICATION,R=REISSUE) R
DATE ACKNOWLEDGED 07/14/95 DATE REVIEWED / / RETURN DATE / t
REG COMM REOS / t DATE DENIED / / NPDES #— ---------
REG COMM RCVD / / DATE RETURNED / / TRIB 0 .0000 MGD
ADD INFO REOS f 1 OT AG COM REDS / / TRIB DATE—
ADD INFO RCVD / t OT AG COM RCVD / /
END STAT APP P 10/01/95 DATE ISSUED / / DATE EXPIRE 06/30/95
FEE CODE( 3)1=(>1MGD),2=()10KGD),3=(>1KGD),4-C<1KGD+SF),5=(S>300A),6=£S<=300A),
7-(SENDEL),8-CSEDEL),9=(CLREC),0=(NO FEE) DISC CODES 72 ASN/CHG PRMT
ENG CERT DATE / t LAST NOV DATE / / CONBILL( )
COMMENTS: ...LANDFILL>)5,000 GPD>PAYOR:TRRNS C0;s200;#741O>
MESSAGE: DATA MODIFIED SUCCESSFULLY ...

ra
lk
NON NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT
DATA 07/14/95
14:51:55
UPDATE
OPTION
TRX I D 50U KEY W0001037.70
PERSONAL
DATA FACILITY
APPLYING
FOR PERMIT APP/PERMIT
FEE-s 200.00
REGION
FACILITY
NAME) TRANSYLVANIA
CO
—SANITARY LRND7
COUNTY> TRANSYLVANIA
01
ADDRESS:
MAILING (REQUIRED) ENGINEER:
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING
STREET:
28 EAST
MAIN ST.
STREET:
PO BOX 97
CITY:
BREVARD
ST NC
ZIP 28712 CITY:
GARNER ST NC
ZIP 27529
TELEPHONE 704 884
3199
TELEPHONE:
818 772 5383
STATE CONTfICT> WFSTALL
FACILITY
CONTACT NEIL EMORY
TYPE OF PROJECT> PUMP
AND HAUL
LAT: LONG:
DATE APP
RCVD,
06/25/90
N=NEW,M=NODIFICRTION,R=REISSUE>
N
DATE ACKNOWLEDGED
06/26/90
DATE REVIEWED
06/26/90 RETURN DATE
/ 1
REG COMM
RFQS
06/26/90
DATE DENIED
/ / NPDES a— ____
REG COMM
RCVD
06/26/90
DATE RETURNED
/ / TRIB Q
.0000 MGD
ADD INFO
REQS
1 t
OT AG COM REQS
/ / TRIG DATE—
ADD INFO
RCVD
/ /
OT AG CON RCVD
/ /
END STAT
APP P
09/23/90
DATE ISSUED
07/16/90 DATE EXPIRE 06/30/95
FEE CODE( 3)1=(>1MGD),2=C>10KGD),3=(>1KGD),4=C(1KGD+SF),5-CS>300A),6=(S<=300A),
7=CSENDEL),8=(SEDEL),9=CCLREC),O=CNO FEE) DISC CODES 72 ASN/CHG PRNT
ENG CERT DATE / / LAST NOV DATE / t CONBILLC )
COMMENTS: LANDFILL
MESSAGE: ENTER DATA FOR UPDATE *

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,`
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr-, Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 14, 1995
MR W ILLIAM SAG AR
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
RT. 2 BOX 525
BREVA.RD, NORTH CAROLINA 28712
Subject: Application. No. WQ0003770
Sanitary Landfill
Pump & Haul
Transylvania County
Dear MR SAGAR:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on July 3, 1995. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE WATER QUALITY NUMBER WREN MAKIING
INQUIRES ON THIS PROJECT.
Your project has been assigned to Forest Westall for a detailed engineering review. Should there be any
questions concerning your project, the reviewer will contact you with an additional information letter.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the
Division.
If you have any questions, please contact Forest Westall at [phone] extension n/a. If the
engineer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
Please reference the above application number when leaving a message.
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Sincerely,
Carolyn cCaskill
Supervisor, State Engineering Review Group
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Egcal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4T .
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 14, 1995
MR WILLfA-M SAGAR
TRANS YLV INIA COUNTY
RT. 2 BOX 525
BREVARD, NORTH CAROLINA 28712
Subject: Application -No. WQ0003770
Sanitary Landfill
Pump k Haul
Transylvania County
Dear MR SAGAR:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on July 3, 1995. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE WATER QUALITY NUMBER WHEN MAKING
INQUIRES ON THIS PROJECT.
Your project has been assigned to Forest Westall for a detailed engineering review. Should there be any
questions concerning your project, the reviewer will contact you with an additional information letter.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the
Division.
If you have any questions, please contact Forest Westall at [phone] extension n/a. If the
engineer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
Please reference the above application number when leaving a message.
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Sincerely,
Carolyn cCaskill
Supervisor, State Engineering Review Group
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 "telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

!' State of North Carolina
i� Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
a u James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED BAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
WILLIAM SAGAR
TRANSYLVANIA CO -SANITARY LAND?
RT. 2 BOX 525
BREVARD, NC 28712
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND
WATER QUALITY PERMIT NO.
TRANSYLVANIA CO -SANITARY
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
Dear Permittee:
October 23,
1995
�A�ERL��EGI0NL10o� CE
ASNLVIL
REVOCATION FOR NON-PAYMENT
WQ0003770
LAND7
asps
Payment of the required annual administering and compliance
monitoring fee of $450.00 for this year has not been received for the
subject permit. This fee is required by Title 15 North Carolina
Administrative Code 211 .0205, under the authority of North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.3(a)(1), (la) and (lb). Because this fee was
not fully paid within 30 days after being balled, this letter initiates
action to revoke the subject permit, pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205(c)(4),
and G.S. 143-215.1(b)(3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, subject permit is
hereby revoked unless the required Annual Administering and Compliance
Monitoring Fee is received within that time. Your payment should be
sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equd Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Construction or operation of a wastewater treatment system without
a permit is subject to the enforcement authority of the Division of
Environmental Management.
If you are dissatisfied with this decision, you have the right to
request an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days following
receipt of this Notice, identifying the specific issues to be
contended. This request must be in the form of a written petition
conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer
27447, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611-7447. Unless such request for
hearing is made or payment is received, revocation shall be final and
binding. If you have any questions, please contact:
Mr. Roy Davis, Asheville Regional Supervisor, [phone].
ncerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr.
cc: Supervisor, Water Quality Permits and Engineering Unit
Asheville Regional Office
County Health Department

State of North Carolina
- Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application
(THIS FORM MAY 6E PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
PUMP AND HAUL DISPOSAL YSTEMzz
�/
�� 41
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (corporation, individual, or
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's N
responsible for the facility and its compliance):
3. Mailing Address:
4.
son who is legally
City: Brevard, State: / "IC Zip: 28712
Telephone No.: 704 ) 884-6830
Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with
project name on plans/specs., letters of flow acceptance. Operational Agreements, etc.):
Transylvania County Landfill
5. Application Date: 6/20/95 6. Fee Submitted: $ 200.00
7. County where project is located: Transylvania
8. Latitude: 35;Longitude: �a ° s'D 0I-Y of facility being pumped
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
I.
2.
3
Permit No. (will be completed by DEM):
If this application is being submitted as a result of a modification to an existing
permit, list the existing permit number and issue date
Specify whether the applicant is x public or pri
FORM: PHDS 4/91 Page 1 of 6

III. INFORMATION ON WASTEWATER:
1. Nature of Wastewater: % Domestic;
PUMP AND HAUL DISPOSAL
PAGE 2 (4/91)
% Commercial;
Industrial; x % Other waste (specify): Landfill Lead_
2. Please provide a one or two word description specifying the origin of the wastewater,
such as school, subdivision, hospital, commercial, industrial, apartments, etc.:
Landfill Leachate
3. If wastewater is not domestic in nature, what -.level of pretreatment has been provided
to ensure protection of the receiving wastewater treatment facility?
Not needed
4. Volume of wastewater to be pumped & hauled: 3—son gallons per day
5. Explanation of how wastewater volume was determined:
IV. TREATMENT FACILITY INFORMATION:
1. Name of wastewater treatment facility receiving wastewater: Brevard waste water Plant
2. Treatment facility permit no.: N('00 0534
3. Treatment facility contact person and telephone no: Don Byers 704/883-8461
4
r5
County where treatment facility is located: _
Distance to treatment facility: 22
V. OTHER INFORMATION:
Transvlvania
miles
1. Brief project description: _IQ c�Qati nuP tn_ cad urp 1 a .ha frnm tha landfill
and take it for disposal.
2. Explanation of why a pump & haul permit is being requested (be specific & explain if an
environmental emergency exists ): The nearby ' river is the west fork of the
French Broad and is high Quality water_
3. Specify how long pump & haul permit needed (shall not exceed 6 months)Pe=ayyij&ths
4. What will'be the permanent method of wastewater disposal once the pump & haul
activities have ceased? Continue to haul and pump
5. Date that permanent disposal method will be available: N/A
2of6

PUMP AND HAUL DISPOSAL
PAGE 3 of 6 (4/91)
6. Have permits/approvals for permanent disposal method been obtained?
Yes; Permit No. Permitting Agency
y No; Pending Permit No. Permitting Agency
7. Describe how the wastewater will be transported (truck, rail car, etc.) and provide the
typical hauling volume of the vehicle providing the hauling:
Truck with 3,000 gallon tank
8. Name of owner of transporting vehicle: _ Trafisrlva;i'
9. Mailing Address of Hauler: Rt. 2, Box 525
City: Brevard State: ` NC Zip: 28712
Telephone No.: 704/884-6830
10. What type of tank or other container will the wastewater be pumped from and what is the
volume of this container? Lagoon 190,000 �allons
11. Was the tank or container already in place or will it be installed for these activities?
12. What type of high water alarm does the container have? None
audible and visual auto dialer
THIS APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT UNLESS ALL OF
THE APPLICABLE ITEMS ARE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL
Required Items
11
a. One original and two copies of the completed and appropriately executed application form.
b. Three sets of detailed plans and specifications signed and sealed by a North Carolina
Professional Engineer. The plans/specifications must include a general location map, a plan
view of the storage facility and its relationship to property lines, and details showing the high
water alarms (provide either audible and visual or an auto dialer). Each sheet of the plans and
the first page of the specifications must be signed and sealed.
c. The appropriate permit processing fee, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).
d. A letter must be provided from the owner/authority of the wastewater treatment facility
stating that the wastewater will be accepted and specifying the volume that will be accepted.
The letter should be a recent letter and should refer to the project by the same name as that
identified on the application and the plans/specifications.
e_ A copy of the contract or agreement between the wastewater hauler and the applicant and a
map indicating the haul route.
f. The application package should be sent to the appropriate regional office, according to the
attached listing on page 4, which provides the regional responsibility by county. If there are
any questions contact the appropriate regional office.

1
1•
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (4/91) �^
Asheville Regional WQ Super.
Washington Regional WQ Super.
Raleigh Regional WQ Super.
59 Woodf-rn Place
P O Box 1507
3800 Barrett Dr.. Suite 101
Asheville, NC 28802
Washington, NC_27889
Raleigh, NC 27609
704/251-6208
919/946-6481
919/733-2314
Avery Macon
Beaufort Jones
Chatham Nash
Buncombe Madison
Bertie Lenoir— � ,
Durham Northampton
Burke McDowell
Camden Martin ; _ 1
Edgecombe Orange
Caldwell Mitchell
Chowan Pamlico'
Franklin Person
Cherokee Polk
Craven Pasquotank '
Granville Vance
Clay Rutherford
Currituck Perquimans.
Halifax Wake
Graham Swain
Dare Pitt
Johnston Warren
Haywood Transylvania
Gates Tyrell
Lee Wilson
Henderson Yancy
Greene Washington
Jackson
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional WQ Super. Mooresville Regional WQ Super.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714 919 North Main Street
Fayetteville, NC 28301 Mooresville, NC 28115
919/486-1541 704/663-1699
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Mecklenburg
Bladen
Robeson
Cabarrus
Rowan
Cumberland
Richmond
Catawba
Stanly
Harnett
Sampson
Gaston
Union
Hoke
Scotland
Iredell
Cleveland
Montgomery
Lincoln
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Super.
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
919/761-2351
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surly
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes -
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Wilmington Region. WQ Super.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
919/395-3900
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
4of6

PUMP AND HAUL DISPOSAL
PAGE 5 (4/91)
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
City:
Telephone No.
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I,
State:
, attest that this application for
Zip:
-has been reviewed by me and is accurate
and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further4 attest that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed design has been prepared in accordance with'the applicable regulations. Although certain
portions of this submittal package may have been developed -by other professionals, inclusion of
these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have
judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Registration No.
Print Name of Engineer
Seal and Signature (specify date):
Applicant's Certification:
I, Will Sagar , attest that this application for
Leachate Pump and Haul Disposal System
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that if all required parrs of this application are not completed and that if all required s'upport:ng
information and attach( nts a not included, this application package will be returned as
incomplete.
Signature e , Date 6/21/95
F�7

PUMP AND HAUL DISPOSAL
PAGE 6 (4/91)
PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING FEES
a
(effective October 1, 1990)
CATEGORY NEW APPLICATIONSI RENEWALS WITHOUT
MODIFICATIONS MODIFICATIONS
>-1,000,000-GP-D
Industrial $400
Domestic/Cooling Water $400
10,001 - 1,000,000 GPD
Industrial $400
Domestic/Cooling Water $400
1,001 - 10,000 GPD
Industrial $400
Domestic/Cooling Water $400
< or = 1,000 GPD and
Single Family Dwelling $240
Sludge < or = 300 Acres $400
$300
$300
$250
$250
$200
$200
$120
$250
Sludge > 300 Acres $400 $250
Sewer Extensions
(nondeiegated) $400 ` 0
Sewer Extensions
(delegated) $200 0
Closed -Loop Recycle
or Evaporative $400 $200
NOTE: The Fees for Soil Remediation Projects are the same as for Sludges.
Under the Sewer Extension Fee, "delegated to municipalities" applies
only to those governmental jurisdictions that have specific delegation
review authority, as granted by the Division of Environmental
Management.
6of6

"tiAls. •k+rr,r•+f�'>rTWn'•ro, rr��b
(q € ;6s T_ '��4J��If � f• -^�'. -acg .s � y ..., q , - ,',: IF x ry, - ,p, �M
�'�'.� � r`M MU
Pl , ;T,Y'HECK No E
:7 9 Q o 4 / 3 Lag S a p S s A 8 ". ,.,f tiTHANSY &� .s ,k �0?410
1�1 sr`= } •s" ek . _ x� ti r� x" Q . sy z..l 28E 48T MAIM STAEEi1, r; aj :, �:, ,S x t,. ?� : ,r ASWO
.
i , °+ .t, ' , -o.
' BR�VARD NC }287}2 3797 , ss.' ' s
ti a ' Is #�I _ ! 2. s; $:.1, €'�
,�LE� ,Irk �y• , ,.:, ,CONTROL NO. CFIECKipATEp Y VENbOR NOS,,; „ a � a , �� „�E , ,(704) 8843104�. , £� � �,�� �s�4 �'}F1AST�UNION NATIOhAL`BANK�� .
� • ` _ "�Px� i `° dam- ? € w4•s � a
-mac �� ��` �,� : •�.', , ;,1! ��n �Sn n =�`�r,,F�i. . ; ...���I����?s �5 .1�-�.� ;�? FI�?rl,IPltb�&'1i�-LPt.;��lfi���f'�.�.�, sr.:�n�,:.- �r� r ���oBREVAR[3.'NC3,!�;5$`�:`ti'�.,,L..___. lra
IWMf
:,TWO..MUNDFZED��;�rAPiD I)0/'� �, 9
_4 i.^, ;�dr. .,r��I s `' k:€-� ,;�'.-3. F i },r.r -�'4 'd:*'s p I+. i'�I F.'y; s:s _.:u : iqw.yty ,AY�>,. r., �'.,,!; % �: £, E zr� �:_ `, _#�.i,..:': "s c t; .�. �,', a'� ,Y•":; ,.� ».€''IN'S DAYS,
,A iq i '4 t'f L`f 'zr-`Y"..,L?.I;�
T aR:.
t" TojTH� 'r
i ■� p x' , L, ;' i }� ; , 1� # )a �t# z pis. -s: P.x } !1d %$' 't ;4 rrr, .tip s e L T r r,Ym. �r .t. ?..�;,n �... 3.r4g; i -;$�� i f:'. ::r ?i • •� ,,}.1
la�
"�a OF d a"^.r^r� P�{ B yEi yr���.G 1°Er-.:ALG�1a?,iPINLG�.o;a.si:#'.T _3".. @@.1 .. •f • "2!=i 1� fi +, i ,.6 ?. I. F �'':. 'FI d....�?,, .'"%.afk. t.w'
!', r^ _.,; 'E:� _. I' I i , It s �, •t+r: i, 'r' a ,tom- ;':
k '>� �, I�el, �; f1 �f.'o. i..
a; ..�k•. .CC� ,� 1,=. 5 .4 j3 - , ,. 1L} b" rvL; ;li ;r ;i; i?s..t3P •s@' �s' q,,�,.r �z,5 �
p"E�� ', a- ?� .X''�i,�,su .�. f �t�" .y3. f� �J,x`5 9a.�,{t - 1 3 �fi -:c jr cir &a `3 ;.. a e �t {y■AA],i �({{�'L�.--- 1.1}y�y►��F ,� ;�.'•_ -,a«
41 ,. z1.4 e7 �'@ "�§ :S °.s,F W #P([�-_,. 9 "C'a & { �.• :4 d y�l. i�j.I�, i��?P '.�°..t YV �y��
[<`i -';'c �' k 4:€ F�' •s'' »"y, A y i + ,r 14 } r t l} i d3ac , k f k: �. 7
61 ; i'. -. a COUNTY MANAGER
� .,r'
tl
II800 7L, 10,16 1:0 S 3 L08 7 26i: 20 70 2800 2 S L,800
A.
Y.
T�rLH'
r

yarn. srartp w
Y 'Ma
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resour-ces
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 14, '1992
Mr. Terry Pierce'
Transylvania County Health Department
Community Services Building
Brevard, North Carolina 28712
Subject: Proposed Building Expansion
Transylvania Landfill
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Pierce:
This office has no objection to the issuance of a
building permit for the proposed expansion of the building
at the Transylvania landfill so long as the expansion does
not result in an increase in wastewater above the system
design and does not impact the existing on site system and
dedicated repair area.
If you need additional clarification,please let me
know.
Sincerely yours,
I
E. Anderson
Environmental Technician
xc: Mike Bradley
Interchange Building, 59 Woexlfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Tcicphonc 704-251-6208
An Equal Opjxirwniiy Affirmative Action Employer

r
r�r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 28, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
THROUGH: Roy M. Davis, Regional_ Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: Forrest R. We
Regional Water upervisor
SUBJECT: Landfill Leachate Permitting Process
Many North Carolina counties have reached the end of the useful life of
existing sanitary landfills. Some of these local governments have
already applied to the Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste for a new
landfill site. Federal and State construction and operation
requirements for landfills include provisions for & sealed and lined
landfills. Because of this requirement, new Landfills must have some
method for the management of leachate that will be produced inside of
this underground envelope.
The removal, and management of the liquid produced in a landfill
presents to the Water Quality Program an important question: What is
to be done with this landfill wastewater? Just recently Transylvania
County approached this office about disposal of the landfill leachate
for the landfill proposed for that County_ The current design calls
for the collection of the wastewater. (assuming it will be characterized
as non -hazardous) and transport to the Town of Brevard's wastewater
treatment plant. The landfill site is very remote to the Brevard
collection system and local receiving streams are very small -
Typically, .Landfill leachate from a household garbage only facility
should not be hazardous and with some pretreatment (if necessary) to
.reduce potentially high oxygen -consuming levels, should be amenable to
standard biological treatment. Introduction to an existing public
treatment system is in all likelihood the most reasonable and
environmentally sound treatment option for dealing with landfill
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Mace, Asheville, NC. ?8801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal OpiwrtonitN, A(r'innative Action Emglover

r
Steve Tedder
Memorandum
February 28, 1990
Page Two
leachate. Variation in both quantity and quality of leachate
represents real operational difficulties for a direct discharge system
and public concern over a landfill discharge or non -discharge system
may result in significant public opposition to either of these choices.
However, as in the Transylvania County site, many of the landfill areas
are remotely located and, therefore, makes the installation of a
collection line unreasonable.
Current Pump and Haul practices as administered by the program view
such arrangements as temporary and not allowed on a long term basis
(most are issued for six months or less). In general, this view is
valid and standard Pump and Haul permits should not be issued for long
periods of time to accommodate normal sewage disposal/treatment (i.e.,
other environmentally sound options are available)_ Landfill leachate
should not be considered as a typical disposal/treatment problem. I
recommend that the Water Quality Program Staff examine the landfill
leachate issue with regard to Pump and Haul Permits and develop
guidelines that will allow permanent use of such .a permit where this
approach is the most reasonable and environmentally sound approach.
This exception to the standard Pump and Haul Permit procedure should in
no way be considered an "open door" to permanent Pump and Haul
approvals for other applications. Some of the aspects of a landfill
leachate pump and haul system that should be addressed are as follows:
* A specific, isolated leachate transfer area must be constructed at
the landfill site. This facility should be a lined and drained
area with a return system to put any spillage or contaminated
runoff (pad area only) back into the storage system.
* Pretreatment facilities should be provided where preliminary
evaluation of leachate strength indicates that raw characteristics
are incompatible with the public treatment system receiving the
wastewater or would not comply with existing or proposed sewer use
controls. While a Pretreatment Program should not be required for
any facility that currently doesn't have one to accept landfill
leachate, the local government controlling the treatment plant
must have a specific agreement in place with the landfill
authority describing the quality of leachate required and the
details for discharge into the collection system (including
notification procedures, monitoring requirements, limitations,
discharge quantity, etc.).
* Only publicly owned treatment systems should be allowed to accept
landfill leachate and existing capacity would have to be available
and allocated to this purpose.
* Additional storage capacity should always be available at the
landfill site to prevent any problems with leachate accumulation.
For example, if two 10,000 gal. are to be used to hold the
leachate, one should always be maintained empty for emergency
storage purposes.

Steve Tedder
Memorandum
February 28, 1990
Page Three
* All pump and haul equipment should be under the control of the
landfill authority. Because of the potential contamination
strength of landfill leachate, contract hauling should be avoided.
A joint agreement between the treatment authority and the landfill
authority could be an acceptable alternative.
If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please let me know.
xc: Dennis Ramsey
Don Safrit
ARO Water Quality Staff

3UL-10-1990 1:2:02 FROM
i
r
EH'!R W I LM REG OFFICE TO
av-
1'7042516452
S'T_"A''F OF N0KJ'H CAS OLINA
Department of E-Dvi`-oziment, HeahJi and Natural Resource,
W�lmi.natnn °eUzoaal 0£;lcp
)amcS C 1'0prtin' GfJv(_rnOr
1Urllizm �o��cy, J;, $ccr�r r� FAX COVER SHET']"
P.01
13s;>i;r ilrt�ityc�:�
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.D,AT E : '7I U
TO
Opy'l C F:
PAY lY i3l*A_1CJ ER
l
DIVISION/ -
SECTION:
TOTAL PAGES:
(including corer) -
).� LJM R. K S :
Fa:'
? �].; :(irir;j,;.:: il!r 11:r�,u•� U'/:lr,�rn ,! ,n• h! (� - ,.:f!: .. � �n,sr ? �;y : ��
.. i _ it .i!•, � rt „�;1 ri
An

JIJL-10-199 12 : 02 FROM EHNP 10I LM REO OFFICE
TO 1704251G452 R.02
i'a.rm,it No. NCO049743
S-FATE OF NORTH CAROL I NA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION DE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
To DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATZQNAPOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
Tn compliance with the provisions of North Caroline Gencro:l Statute 143-21.5. 1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated. and adopted by the North Carolina
Knv.i..ronmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control !act:, Safi
amended,
The County of Now Hanover
is hereby aotho.rizsd to discharge wastewater: from m {Aci.l •i_t-.v loomed ni:
Nwx Hanover County Solid & t:e Disposal a l 00,
t..,,
5351 U.S. Highway 421.
New Hanover Connt.y
to r:ef-'O iJ ping wcgt.er:= thr Northeast; (Ape River in t,:hc Capl Fc *r
River Bu iri
in + GCpJCic�Ctf. With of &Rnt l,f.mitations, monitoring othcr
conditions set_ .forth in farts .1., TT, and IIT berr,of.
This permit shoo become effective Novtmber 1, 1988
This permit and the authorization to di.schargo 0011 vxp+.rn :tt: midnight: on.
September: 30, 1993
Si.gnrd this day October. 3, 1988
`��SZina1 5i�red 0
A�tT;�LIR MpUgERr��
Fut:
.�..,,....._...... ............. R. Paul. Wf 0s , Director.
Division. of Environmental ;•sa age+rM.
By AutUr ,i ty of the Enf i r<Snni:,s uN I %nagement: C%omm.i 4s i on
5

JUL-10-1990 1 :O3 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO 17042516452 P.03
Permit- No. NCO049743
5Upp7,F.MFw TO Pmrr covyR StrUT
The County of New Hanovt:r,
is hereby authorized to:
X. Continue to operate an aerated lagoon-typc wnstownter treatment
facility and a 0.01.4 MGD package -type wastewater.- t:r otment plait JonaCed at.
the Now Hanover. County MY Waste Disposal. Site, 5351 U.S. Highway 47.1,
Wilmington, New Mover County (Notre Part, ITT. of this Por.m:i.t); and
2. Discharge from saa_d treatment works into the Nor.thoart; Cape Fear Rivnr,
which is Anssifi.ed Class C-Swampwnter- in tht: Capa Foam, River Basin.
i

1
A. (1). UFWENT LIMITATIGNS AND MONITORING REQUIREKENTS Final NPDES No. NC0049743
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permitaad
lasting until
expiration the Permittee is authorized to discbarge from
outfall(s) serial
number(s)
001.
discharges shall be linited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified
below:
Effluent
Characteristics
Discharge Limitations
iSonitoring Requirements
Ibs d
Other Units (Specify)
Measurement
Sal
*Sample
Daily_!kn. Daily Hax.
Dai; Avg. __lla.il� Max
F�uenc1
ne
Location
Flaw
0.050 MGD
Continuous
Recording
E, l
BCD,
5day, 20 degree C
30.0 mg/l 45.0 mg/1
2/month
Composite
E
Total
Suspended Residue
30.0 mg/1 45.0 sag/1
2/month
Composite
E
Acute
Toxicity '`
Quarterly;
Composite
E
Total
,Arsenic
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Cadmium
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Chromium
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Copper f
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Iron
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Mickel
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Aluminum
Quarterly
Composite
E
Mercury
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
lfanganese
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 } TKX)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total
Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
*Sample
locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U
- Upstream, Q - Downstream
Acute Tonicity (Daphnid 4$ hr) Quarterly Monitoring, See Part 1II, Condition G.
r
I
t�
Such
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units arad shall be monitored 2/month
at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no. discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
F-'
I �J
r}l

i
JLIL-10-1990 12: 03 FROM EHI R W I Lrl REG OFFICE
New Hanover County Landfill
C. Acute Toxicity Testing Requirement
TO 17042516452 P.05
Permit No. NCO049743
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a guart_erly basis using
protocols defined in the North Carolina Procedure Document: entitled "Pass/Fail
Methodology For, Dotoxmi_ni.ng Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentratiou". The monitoring shall be performed as a Daphnia puJex or.
Ceriodaphnia 48 hour static test, using; effluent collected as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which thorn may be at no time
significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two i,n, the North.
Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for self. -monitoring purposes
must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. The first test will be performed after thirty days from issnancc
of this permit during the months of March, June, September and December.
The parameter: code for this test if using f]&ph.rai.a przl,ez. i,s TAA31). The
paxmeter. code ,for this test if using Celriodaphni.a is TOO, All toxicity
testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on
the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) fcr the month in which it wns
performed, using the appz:opri.zate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2
(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Teahrr,i,cal Services Branch.
North Carolina Division of. Environmental Meoggement
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, North Wrol.:i.na 27611-7687
Test data shall be complete and accurate and includo all suppor_tigg
chemical/physical measurements performed in assocint.ion with the toxicity
tests, as wyll as *11 dose/response dotal_ Total residool c4l_or:ke of the
effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is Employed
for disinfection of the waste stream,
Should any test data from either this monitoring r.qquitroment or tests performed
by the North Carolina Division of. Envx. omoutal Nanogrment i,ntlKit•e potential
impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may by reopened and modified to
include alternate monitoring requirements or. limitations -
Note: Failure to achieve test con0t,ions ns sper, i,i i,od in the cited dounmont,
such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate anvi,ronmentel,
controls, shall constitute an i.n.val.id test: and will r.e.qui.rr i_mmedi_nte retesting
(within 30 days of initial monitoring event:). 'rei.lyxe to submit suitable test
results will constitute non-compliance with monitoring requirements.

JUL-1 U-1593 12= 04 FPU 1 EHHR W I LM REG OFFICE TO
17042516452 P.06
New Hanover County [,oWi.11
Permit No. NCO049743
N. Permit modification
This permit shall be modified, or alternatively, revoked and reissued, in the
event that toxic pollutant concentrations in the off.loant: exceed a. level, equal,
to or greater than ten (10) times the applicable wafts: quality standards.
The permit ns modified or reissued under, this paragraph shnil also contain any
other requirements then applicable.
T. if the effluent fails the whole -effluent toxicity test (Condition G above),
this permit; may be modified to place limits on toxicapts deemed to be the cause
of toxicity -test failures.
TOTAL P.06

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
GROUNDWATER SECTION
October 8, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Coffee, Permitting Unit
Solid Waste Branch
THROUGH: Roy Davis, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: Kay Dechant, Hydrogeologist -p
Groundwater Section
SUBJECT: Demolition Landfill
Transylvania County
In response to Jim Patterson's query regarding the acceptability of
constructing a drainage system (underdrain) at the subject site, the
Groundwater Section has no objection provided there is a separation
distance of 4 feet of soil between the waste material and the seasonal high
groundwater level.
According to Gary Tweed, Environmental Engineer with the Water Quality
Section, an NPDES Permit is not required.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
LKD/gc
cc: Bob Cheek
Jim Patterson
Gary Tweed

RECEIVED
Water Quality Section
JUL. 2 µ-1990
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural ResourceAsheville regional- Office
Division of Environmental Management Asheville, forth Carolina
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 29, 1990
Mr. James. C. Diehl, PE
Municipal Engineering Services Co., Inc.
PO Box 97
Garner, NC 27529
George T. Everett, Ph. D.
Director
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
Transylvania County Landfill
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Diehl:
On June 28, 1990, the Division of Environmental Management received a NPDES
Permit Application for the subject facility. The application is considered incomplete. Therefore,
the Division of Environmental Management is returning the application.
The returned information must be resubmitted with the following to complete the
application:
1 . Engineering Proposal (see attached).
2. Environmental Economics Analysis (see attached).
3. Effective October 1, 1989, the requirements of General Statute 143-215.1 (g)
must be addressed as part of the engineering proposal (see attachment).
4. Analysis of wastewater from a similar landfill or projected analysis for the
proposed landfill.
The Division of Environmental Management will initiate the permit review process
upon receipt of the above requested information. The receipt of the above information does not
preclude this Division from requesting additional information at a future date.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Sincerely,
A, JAML
M. Dale Overcash, PE
Supervisor, NPDES Permits
Pollution Prevenlion Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�4FQ
Water �u
State of North Carolina
Uepartment of Environment, Health and Natural Resourc �t�p�',':,L +:``` s;^ a;;t•'tt►a
Division of Environmental Management ' psr,e�:ite, lto''
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor
Willian-i W, Cobcy, 1r , Secretary
Dear % _ �-U U 6&AAU
George T. Everett, Ph.D
Director
1990
Subject: Return of Incomplete pplica ion
�,G�
County
In accordance with Division olicv, we must hereby return as incomplete the attached
applications materials received I , 1990. It lacks the following items:
V Three sets of plans and specifications silted and sealed by a professional engineer.
Completed and signed application forte
Gravity sewer or pump station checklist (copy enclosed).
Letter of flow acceptance.
Operational Agreement for private sewers serving multi -family dwellings.
Permit application fee of
Subsurface evaluation/soil scientist's report for surface and subsurface waste
disposal permits, including loading rate calculations.
Waste. Analyses and EP Toxicity Analysis,
Land Owner's Agreement for sludge disposal applications.
Other items:
After you have obtained the checked items, you may resubmit your application for review.
Please submit all the 'stems returned to you and the checked items together. Should you have any
questions, please contact Mr. Mark Hawes or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
arolyn c as 1 Supervisor
cc: Regional Office
I� State.Engincering Review Group
�,P,U(�,�
SERG File
Pollution Pre-venuion Pays
P.o, Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 'Telephone 919-M-7015
An Equal DpporturuEy Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann 13. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., SecreDirvision of Environmental Management Regional Manager
Water Quality Section
April 4, 1990
Mr. D. Wayne Sullivan
Municipal Engineering Services Co., P.A.
P.O. Box 97
Garner, N.C. 27529
Subject: Proposed Pump and Haul
Transylvania County Landfill
Leachate Disposal
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
This office is receipt of your April 2, 1990 letter and
four sets of plans for subject project. Three sets of the
documents are being returned to you and should be submitted
along with the enclosed application form to:
Mr. Don Safri.t
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
A permit processing fee of $200.00 should accompany the
application. It will be necessary for the County Manager or
someone authorized by the County to sign the application.
Should you have any questions or need assistance please
contact this office at 704-251-6208.
Sincerel yours,
v '
Gary T. Tweed, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
Division of Environmental Management
GTT
cc Don Safrit
Wil Sager
Interchange Auilding, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

North Carolina Department of Envi. .neat, Health. and Natural Resources
DEM USE ONLY
Permit Number:
Environmental Management Commission
3
NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION"
„
In accordance with NC General Statutes Chapter 143, Article 21
County:
Transylvania
Applicant (name of board, individual, or others):
Application Date:
Transylvania County
June 1, 1990
Project (name of city, village, town, sanitary district, establishment):
Transylvania County Sanitary Landfill
FOR:
Brief Project Description:
�] Non -Discharge Treatment./Disposal Facilities
To transport, by truck, leachate collected
❑ Pretreatment Facilities
❑ Sewer Collection System (private)
at the new lined sanitary landfill to the
❑ Extension of Sewer'Syst'ems (public)
Brevard Wastewater Plant. The; leachate will
❑ Sludge Disposal
❑ Spray irrigation
�.� "
be delivered to the pretreatment acili�t ?iat�,.
,ham _,y��
NATURE OF WASTEWATER:
the Brevard plant.
N
90
❑ Domestic Sewage
Sludge/Industrial Waste
n P�R1�1rS Q+•-
Estimated Completion Date:
Dece ber 1, 1990�
Other Waste
From (sewers, pretreatment plant): Serving (city, institution, Industry):
Transylvania County Sanitary Landfill i Transylvania
Count
Into (name of treatment plant): Average Daily Gallons Sewage or Waste Flow:
City of Brevard Wastewater Plant 1 3,000
At (location of plant):
(NPDES No.)
Wilson Road Brevard, N. c.
NC00 60534
Name and Complete
Address of Engineering Firm: Municipal Engineering Services Co. ,
P.p Code: 27529
P. 0. Box 97 Telephone
No. 919-772-5393
"4L
Applicant assures that proposed works will be constructed, supervised, operated and maintained in accordance
with approved plans and specifications or approved changes thereto.
Neil Emory Mailing 28 East Main St.
In IQgn
Print Name: Address:
.II
Title: County Manager Brevard, N. c.
Zip Code:, 28712
Signature: Telephone No. /
704 / 884-3100
'i
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Fill-in All Spaces. If not applicable, enter N/A.
2.Secure appropriate signature (mayor/city manager for municipality, chairman for sanitary district board, owner/proper official of
corporation, or legally constituted board or commission in charge of proposed works). A letter of authorization is required from
proper official if design engineer or other agent signs application.
3.Submit to Division of Environmental Management, Permits and Engineering Unit, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611 the original
and ALL carbon copies of the application, 3 sets of finalized plans, specifications and other supporting data as required by Com-
mission nuns, ana permit Fee. r,ans ana specencanons must oe stgnea ana seaiea oy a regtsterea norm carouna engineer.
FOR ASSISTANCE, CALL THE STATE CENTRAL OFFICE [phone], PERMITS & ENGINEERING UNIT, OR:
Asheville [phone] Fayetteville [phone] Mooresville [phone] Winston-Salem [phone]
59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Bldg. 919 North Main Street 8025 North Point Boulevard
Asheville, NC 28802 Fayetteville, NC 28301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Washington [phone]
1424 Carolina Avenue
P.O. Box 1507
Washington, NC 27889
Raleigh [phone]
3800 Barnett Drive
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Wilmington [phone]
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
t
6

/ • d � STATE 4�
L11
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
M2 North Salisbury Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor 19 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Date: t ►-�- F Director
r
SUBJECT Application No. WQ
,.' �/I 1 r�" t � f f �l 1 �` /fl�` r/ �/l l t (� � j �"! 1 l' t 'f t' 1 fr ..I /� � t �` 1. i - l• , � (,
Dear
The Divisions Permits and •Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
materials on 19 `10 This application has been assigned the number shown above. Please
refer to this number/when making inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to ! j i �`•�' for a detailed engineering
review. A technical acknowledgement will be orthcoming. If this acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30)
days, please contact the engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the Regional Super-
visor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the Division.
If you have any questions, please call the review engineer listed above at [phone].
Sincerely
Donald Safrit, P.E.
Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
cc: �f }� �� �� ' -/C/Regional Supervisor
t1 r 11!
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor � George T. Everett, PhD.
William W Cobey Jr., Secretary Date: — '� % ' 3 U `� ]9 ��' Director
f;
SUBJECT Application No., WQ �� Y 7,)
YI I lr .f V. 0/1 ) l/i/
Dear
I
The Divisions Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and. supporting
materials on %,,,' /r—"-� , 19 504. This application has been assigned the number shown above. Please
refer to this number/when making inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to _ `� j� f - �' { f �.l-��� for a detailed engineering
review. A technical acknowledgement will be Forthcoming. If this acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30)
days, please contact the engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Divisions regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the Regional Super-
visor or a Procedure Four Evaluation 'for this project, prior to final action by the Division.
If you have any questions, please call the review engineer listed above at [phone].
Sincerely
Donald Safrit, ,P.E.
Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
CC; ��'�N��1i' d •T Regional Supervisor
_.ii
1 � J
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

North Carolina Department of Envi: .sent, Health, and Natural Resources DEN USE ONLY
Environmental Management Commission Permit Number:
h )C)fYY13-i1D
NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION*
In accordance with NC General Statutes Chapter 143, Article 21 County:
p _ Transylvania
Applicant (name of board, Individual, or others): -"
Application Date:
Transylvania Country
June 1. 1990
Project (name of city, village, town, sanitary district, establishment):
Transylvania Country Sanitary Landfill
FOR:
Brief Project Description:
0 Non -Discharge Treatment/Disposal Facilities
To transport, by truck, leachate collected
❑ Pretreatment Facilities
❑ Sewer Collection System (private)
at the now lined sanitary landfill to the
❑ Extension of Sewer Systems (public)
Brevard wastewater Plant. The leachate will
❑ Sludge Disposal
❑ Spray Irrigation
be delivered to the pretreatment facility at
NATURE OF WASTEWATER:
the Brevard plant.
❑ Domestic Sewage
❑ Sludge/Industrial Waste:
Estimated Completion Date:
December 1, 1990
Other Waste
From (sewers, pretreatment plant): Serving (city, institution, Industry):
Transylvania County Sanitary Landfill i Transylvania County
Into (name of treatment plant): Average Daily Gallons Sewage or Waste Flow:
City of Brevard Wa3tOwater Plant 1 3,000
At (location of plant): ANPDES No.)
Wilson Road Brevard, N. c. NCoo 60534
Name and Complete
Address of Engineering Firm: Municipal Engineering Serviced Co. ,',P. Zip Cade: 27529
P. 0. Box 97 919-772--5393
► Telephone No.
C.urnnr• Tt n
Applicant assures that proposed works will be constructed, supervised, operated and maintained in accordance
with approved plans and specifications or approved changes thereto.
Neil Emory Mailing 28 East Main St.
Print Name: Address:
Title. County Manager Brevard, N. c. zip Code: 28712
� �'
Signature: � �"` Telephone[phone] No.' / /
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.Fill-in All Spaces. If not applicable, enter N/A.
2.Secure appropriate signature (mayor/city manager For municipality, chairman for sanitary district board, owner/proper official of
corporation, or legally constituted board or commission in charge of proposed works). A letter of authorization is required from
proper official if design engineer or other agent signs application.
3.Submit to Division of Environmental Management, Permits and Engineering Unit, P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, NC 27611 the original
and ALL carbon copies of the application, 3 sets of finalized plans, specifications and other supporting data as required by Com-
mission mutes, ana permit roe. runs ana specuicattons must oe signeu ana seatea oy a registerea noun a.arouna
FOR ASSISTANCE, CALL THE STATE CENTRAL. OFFICE [phone], PERMITS•& ENGINEERING UNIT, OR:
Asheville [phone] Fayetteville [phone] Mooresville [phone] Winston-Salem [phone]
59 Woodfin Place
Suite 714 Wachovia Bldg.
919 North Main Street 8025 North Point Boulevard
Asheville, NC 28802
Fayetteville;�NC 28301
Mooresville, NC 28115 Suite 100
'
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Raleigh [phone]
Washington [phone]
Wilmington [phone]
3800 Barrrett Drive
1.424 Carolina Avenue
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
P.O. Box.27687
P.O. Box 1507
Wilmington, NC 28403
Raleigh, -NC 27611
Washington, NC 27889

MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CU., r.A.
Post Office Box 97
Post Office Box 349
Garner, N.C. 27529
Boone, N.C. 28607
[phone]
[phone]
FAX [phone]
FAX [phone]
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter E Change order ❑
ILIE171E � JF URUSHOTKU
DATE_�
u r
c7
706 NO.
G Sao --dq
ATTENTION
RE:
the following items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1 UQ I �- i 1 cka
n r lee
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
or approval El Approved as submitted
© For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment 13
p FOR BIDS DUE 19
REMARKS
JUN ZJ 1�1lu
❑ Res urbrRKI�copies fof. approval
❑ Submit copies for distriition
0 Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
I
COPY TO
SIGNED:
It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notit u at once.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmemal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
George T. Everett, Pli.D.
4 , 1990 Director
Subject: P,,eturn of Incomplete pplic on
County
In accordance with Division olicy, we must hereby return as incomplete the attached
applications materials received , 1990. It lacks the following items:
V Three sets of plans and specifications signed and sealed by a professional engineer.
Completed and signed application form. —
Gravity sewer or pump station checklist (copy enclosed).
Letter of flow acceptance.
Operational Agreement for private sewers serving multi -family dwellings.
Permit application fee of
Subsurface evaluation/soil scientist's report for surface and subsurface waste
disposal permits, including loading rate calculations.
Waste Analyses and EP Toxicity Analysis. .
Land Owner's Agreement for sludge disposal applications.
Other items: g PPS'.
JUIV
2,5 i y
prr Pvir
.x
After you have obtained the checked items, you may resubmit your application for rcviqq�v.
Please submit al] the items returned to you and the checked items together. Should you have.ttny
questions, please contact Mr. Mark Hawes or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
arolyn as, i , Super -visor
' State Engineering Review Group
cc: Regional Office
SERG File
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

.� -r ,�, '-� � '
i � i % � 1
�� � , t
1 �� `, � .k

..r
June 12, 1990
Mr. Don Safri t
NC Division of Environmental Management
PO Box 27667
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Proposed Pump & Haul
Transylvania County Landfill
Leachate Disposal
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Safrit:
I am writing to request permission to transport leachate from the Transylvania
County Secured Landfill to the Town of Brevard's Wastewater Treatment Facility.
We will be transporting the leachate in a 2000-3000 gallon metal tank that can
be moved with one of the County's solid waste roll -off trucks. According to
the EPA's Hydrological Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model, the
annual discharge per lined acre of landfill will be approximately 73,750 gal-
lons. The annual amount for the first three (3) or four (4) years will be
approximately 221,250 gallons with the final amount after closure being in the
neighborhood of 650,000 to 700,000 gallons per year with a soil cap. We will
collect the leachate in two (2) 15,000 gallon fiberglass tanks at the landfill.
Backup storage will be available in the first cell of the landfill by closing
the valves to the leachate collection tanks.
The landfill is located approximately three (3) miles off U. S. 64 southwest of
Rosman, North Carolina. We will be transporting the leachate approximately 15
miles down U. S. 64 to the Brevard pretreatment facility from the landfill. We
will be bypassing Rosman on the new U. S. 64, then along 64 to the Old 64 in
Brevard on SR 1533, and then along SR 1540 to the treatment facility and final
disposal.
The transporting of leachate to Brevard is our only alternative. Land application
can not be accomplished because of the steep terrain. A point discharge into the
French Board River is not feasible because of its classification near where we
would discharge. Also, a point discharge into an adjacent stream is out because
of the seasonal low flows.

r
Mr. Don Safri t �U v
Page 2
June 12, 1990
K'r,=.,
6oIr .'tdgy„c
Please find enclosed three (3) copies of a Transylvania County roadway map
depicting our route for the transportation of the lea `hate, three (3) copies
of the plans for the ieachate collection system at th landfill and three (3)
copies of the EPA HELP Model. The $200 application fee is also enclosed.
If you have any questions concerning this request, please do not hesitate to
call us. We would like to get under construction as soon as possible and any
consideration you can give this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CO., P.A.
D. Wayne Sullivan
DWS:cw
Enclosures
Copy: 1.4r. Will Sagar
;a•
juiv
n

Exhibit A
RANSYLVANIA Co. Landfill ~1-4
o Drainage Layer (Closed w/ CN 97.5) JU� 1 '
��
��
� -^~»S�E��gF[�NC
>
GOOD MASS
LAYER 1
VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYEf
THICKNESS = 24.00 INCHES
Pr-USITY = 0.4630 VOL/VOL
F D CAPACITY = 0.2320 VOL/VOL
W^�FING POINT = 0.1157 VOL/VOL
INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT = 0.1956 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = 0.001553999959 CM/SEC
LAYER 2
VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER
THICKNESS = 384.00 INCHES
POROSITY = 0.5200 VOL/VOL
FIELD CAPACITY = 0.2942 VOL/VOL
WILTING POINT = 0.1400 VOL/VOL
INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT = 0.2934 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = 0.000199999995 CM/SEC
LAYER 3
LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER
1 AKNESS = 36.00 INCHES
POROSITY = 0.4630 VOL/VOL
FIELD CAPACITY = 0.2320 VOL/VOL
WILTING POINT = 0'1157 VOL/VOL
INITTAL SOIL WATER CONTENT = 0,2783 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 0.000369999994 CM/SEC
SLOPE = 2.00 PERCENT

�
�
0
LAYER 4
�ARRIER SOIL LIN�RWI�H FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE 1-I1 ER
T�KNEB3 = 1.00 INCHEB
POROSITY = 0.4000 VOL/VOL
FIELD CAPACITY = 0.3560 VOL/VOL
WILTING POINT = 0.2B99 VOL/VOL
INITIAL BOIL WATER CONTENT = 0.4000 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = 0.000000010000 CM/�EC
LINER LEAKAGE FRACTION = 0.00000000
GENERAL SIMULATION DATA
=CS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER
TOTAL AREA OF COVER = 43�60. �Q FT
EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH = 21.00 INCHES
UPPER LIMIT VEG. STORAGE = 9.7270 INCHES
INITIAL VEG. STORAGE = 4.0452 INCHES
INITIAL SNOW WATER CONTENT = 2.0681 INCHES
INITIAL TOTAL WATER STJRA6E IN
SOIL AND WASTE LAYERS = 127.7619 INCHES
SOIL i-4ATEIR CONTENT INITIALIZED BY PROGRAM.
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA
---------------- ____
SYNTHETIC RAINFALL WITH SYNTHETIC DAILY TEMPERATURES AND
SOLAR RADIATION FOR ASHEVILLE NORT� CAROLINA
MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX = 3.30
START OF GBOWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) 110
END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) = 296
NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURES, DE(-JREES FAHRENHEIT
JAN/JUL FEB/AUG
39.00 40.50
72.00 72.00
MAR/SEP
47.00
66.50
APR/OCT
55.00
57.00
MAY/NOV
63.00
46.00
�R1ING CALCULATIONS
FOR. YEAR
1.
1A\ .AKE UP TO
2O0 MIN
ON AN XT
WITHOUT A MATH COFROCESSOR,
UP TO
2O MIN
ON AN XT
WITH A MATH COpROCESBOR, OR
UP TO
5 MIN
ON AN AT
WITH A MATH COPROCE�SOR,)
JUN/DEC
70'00
39'00

|�P TO 0 ON T MATH C3PROCEAY TKU
UP TO 20 MIN ON A WITH A MATH CoPROCESSOF J�
. ^����
UP TO �5 MIN ON �..,`. WITH A MATH COPROCES5OR')'
1ING CALCULATIONS
FOR
YEAR
3.'
{A\ AKE UP TO 200 MIN
ON'
AN
X'T W171-10UT A MATH COPROCESSOR,
UP TO 20 MIN
ON
AN
XT WITH A MATH COPROCESSDR, OR
UF TO 5 !lIN
OM
AN
AT WITH A MATH CO'PROCE3COR.)
]RFORMING CALCULATIONS FOR YEAR 4.
1AY TAKE UP TO 200 MIN ON AN XT WITHOUT A MATH COFROCESSOR,
UP TO 20 MIN ON AN XT WITH A MATH COF�ROCEBSOR, OR
UP TO 5 MIN ON AN AT VJITH A MATH COPROCESSOR.)
FORMING CALCULATIONS
FOR
YEAR
5.
1AY TAKE UP TO 200 MIN
ON
AN XT
WITHOUT A MATH COPROCESSOR'
UP TO
20 MIN
ON
AN XT
WITH A MATH COPROCESSOR, OR
UP TO
5 MIN
ON
AN AT
WITH A MATH COPROCESSOR.)
�* **************************�***************��*********************
AVERAGE MONTHLY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
VALUES IN
INCHES
FOR YEARS
1
THROUGH
5
JAN/JUL
FEB/AUG
MAR/SEP
APR/OCT
MAY/NOV
JUN/DEC
PRECIPITATION
TOTALS
5.13
6.26
6.17
3.96
7.70
5.44
7.27
5.17
4�62
6.27 .
4.36
3.44
STD. DEVIATIONS
3.14
2.91
2.54
1.37
4.51
2.74
2.72
1.79
1.72
4.48
1.29
2,24
RUNOFF
TOTALS
3.130
3.15�
2.845
1.664
3.95B
2.315
3.2B2
2'4�4
2.473
3.49G
2.2�3
2.459
STD' DEVIATIONS
1.759
2.029
1.546
0.771
2.865
1.719
1.997
0.907
1.563
3.3B8
1.0B4
1.B08
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
TALS
1.6O5
1'��0
3.249
3.249
3.795
3.�63
3.6B�
2.B52
2.403
1.706
1.851
l,387
DEVIATIONS
0.053
17,
�.3��
1'1B4
1.722
1.198
0.688
0.B3�
0.5G7
0.902
O.545
LATERAL DRAINAGE FROM LAYER
___________
3

..-
I:,_
D. DEVIATIONS
0. C 5?5
1_?3J.'_`
f_). t7J11 /._
t_i. 1%,J -_�:
t„r. t_!J4-
lf. t_r Jt 1{i_r
{_� . 0513
�_! . !_! J t_i _'
j) . f }!t. tom+
t„? n f) T �' %
r_7 l ! . �_I l)
f S , (_! u5.J 1
F ERCOL(I T I i=N FROM
LAYER 4
s-s, i=t,;C;ti
I) i;n )n
t_) , t_if_if) n
t_) , t_?i )i ii)
f_) , t_ri )r_rt_r
f_r „ t7r()t_ai_a
t_? „ (_r00f r
STD. DEVIATIONSC%,
{)Cl0C)
f_i, i-1i)04,l
[?o f,)t,fi,!f,)
[,), ()f„)i,if,)
fi f;i)(it)
f?, rai_a(?fa
t_r t a t_s
t_? . t) t_; t s t„s
t_r . (_) t_) t_) t_)
f• „ t„) Q t_) t_r
r ; , s i r f.r 0
,,.
.Iv .jt ryv It r}. rtv r it %- y l..}, +i-. +
rl-. rtiv Tyv i ,I Try .C, ry,
.I, k, ry� r�. ryv T
+1+ ry-. , rl, rl rr r
"' ,I, ry, • ry. + ry,
,h ,I, .It •h r
T T +fv r'1. 'f` JyL 1
**>,Y*,1` **.10! * F)V-7144*:;i***IxI%:!a:Vk n;liik#*:>F*: *:�:**iniK**r. k k�**'A"fix*** ::Klip * :* *, **1 *%kit *
VEF'.Af.51H ANNUAL TOTALS ll -STD.
DEVIA T a.!7fi,1S) f=OR
YEAiRS 1. THROUGH
( NcI—IEs }
{ i�L! . 1:= T n
PERCENT
'. 1" I'� pp I». // 'T l' jj'l
)µ I�,1.` �...: 1 i I I .. l.J 1 `I
{-
.- % . / \
'7 Ci
V . ! . •
'-- :7 L. "7f
.._ "'F'...� ! _) n
", r"
_. t_i L_:
PUN0FI
_T.46Ei (
4.905',
121491.
49. _'7
E''Jf—tPOTFr=�I�Er' IRA 1 Clr•l
=<1 . 222- (
4. CJ47 :
1 _ _ _ ' � .
46. C
LATERAL L R(_F I NAGS. Fl^;,'O ~1
^ . 71512' (
f) . 5 9 31.:
9E56.
4. 1
LAYER _
`E H__F=17101\1 .1-R011 I._f-yYER 4
i)„ ijf!i;(,r (
:,), t;i,)Cxr)
is„
CHAr,IGE IN WATER. GTOF AGE
=? . = 82 C
2. 1.'9t�
�4 ' :i' ``4 ':'�r� Y! '!� :{ `�f ."S a 'C i3 � ?�{ ;�' ,�' a� dt •k v `'{ iT d:
•i• :� :- { ;� +. � ;jt i +i I n I T .f 4, ni I i I I n .i, n I n,
'w W .r :K `r
'n m it ;x�, :i, i .,, +
`'� ;i i� "IC K U 3 ' `''°
ry I I +1 � %� � I- �r >� � ry+ � �
' '� 'k :� '.✓ 7C
� %ry T +r `� m )� t �'
.y..o. '. u, w ;1 � � r.,. v .6- k
F-:'E "if::: DAILY f, ALUEE; FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH �
(INC'HES) (CU. FT.)
I-`RIEC I F• I TAT T I ON 2'. 92 11)99 . w
I ii_1',IOF 1= I .... 1. _ 9796 .
LATERAL DRAINAGE FROM LAYER _ i i „ f) i9.w
PERCOLATION FROM L.A"Y ER 4
HEAD ON LAYER 4 11.
'SNOW WATER _ „ 06 11 t )9
MAXIMUM VEG. -OIL I:If=1TER (VOL/'•.COL) _;, -1'??i
wL yy I''17: N I I'L U l" l VEG.
.E G . "f � I L�r..` i1 rya T Ey Rlyr ,,iyy �;{�' Oy i_ /fir V O C_ ? �y yy .` LL11 `I�.�� 1:y7 nyy 1L ..1Fyr � `,� Jyr ���4y �II,,�� .Ir .yA• 3. ,1r
.lt T %� .n • hti I» .n r`'n m ri, Aa T Y m '~ -,' iM1 .r +f+ ?� i;5 �fv T m rr 'F : ;ii :: /f: i5 i;• rh ) :n �* rl� %', 'l T 'R T '�, /P r`'�i a::?v .`,.:r .. '3, 'm . •h •rj, m

`
` .
FINAL WATER STORAQE AT END OF YEAR 5
------------------------------�L ----------------------------
LAYER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL)
1 5.86 8.2442
2 114'51 0.2982
3 10.94 0.3039
4 0.40 0.4000
SNOW WATER 0.00
5 SELECT OUTPUT OPERATION:
TER 3 TO RUN THE SIMULA7I0N AND OBTAIN DETAILED OUTPUT,
4 TO RUN THE SIMULATION AND OBTAIN ONLY SUMMARY OUTPUT, OR
5 TO STOP THE PROGRAM.

N
w
Exhibit A
.
*St,
*********************
*******�********
RANSYLVANI'Al Co. Landfill
|o Drainage Layer (Closed w/ CN 97.5)
K8/B�
] ~~
PEROITS -`,^
**********************************�*
*%******�r***�*****�*********
GOOD GRA5S
LAYER 1
VERTICAL PERCOLATIGN LAYER
THICKHE�S = 24.00 INCHES
p OSITY = 0.4630 VOL/VOL
. -D CPACIT= 0'2320 VOL/VOL AY
W��TING POINT = 0.1157 VOL/VOL
INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT = 0.1956 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HY�RAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = 0.001553999959 CM/SEC
LAYER 2
VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER
THICKNES384.00 INCHES
POROSITY = O.5200 VOL/VOL
FIELD CAPACITY = 0.2942 VOL/VOL
WILTING POINT = 0.1400 VOL/VOL
INITIAL SOIL WATER' CONTENT = 0.2934 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC C�NDUCTIVITY = 0'000199999995 �M/�EC
n�)�
"���«��8Y�r~?~�
��k
|UN 9 5 1,d�U
� LAyER 3
L�TERAL �RAZNAG� LAYER
'
INC1 :ES
FOROSITY = 0.4630 V�L/VOL
FIEL� CAPACITY VOL/VOL
�ILTING �8INT = 0.1157 VOL/VOL
INITIHL SOIL WATE� CO�TENT = 0,2783 VOL/VOL
BATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTlVITY = 0.0003699�9994 CM/�EC
SL�PE = 2.00 PERCEUT
0
0
=

LAYER 4
BARRIER SOIL LINER WITH'FLEXIBLE MEMBRAME LINER�
1.00 INCHEB
POROSITY = 0.4000 VOL/VOL
FIELD CAPACITY = 0.356(1 VOL/VOL
WILTING POINT = O.2999 VOL/VOL
INITIAL �OIL WATER CONTENT = D.4000 VOL/VOL
SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = 0.00000001000O CM/(SEC
LINER LEAKAGE F�A�TION = O.O0000000
GENERAL SIMULATION DATA
_______________________
SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER
= 77.50
TOTAL AREA OF COVER
= 43560. SQ
FT
EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH
= 21.00 INCHES
UPPER LIMIT VEG. STORAGE
= 97230
INCHEE-
INITIAL VEG' STORAE-E
= 4.0452
INCHES
INITIAL SNOW WATER CONTENT
= 2,06B1
INCHES
INITIAL TOTAL WATER STORAGE IN
SOIL AND WASTE LAYERS
= 127.7619
INCHES
SOIL WATER CONTENT I�1TIALIZED BY PROGRAM'
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA
SYNTHETIC RAINFALL WITH SYNTHETIC DAILY TEMPERATURES AND
SOLAR RADIATION FOR A�HEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA
MAXlMUM LEAF AREA INDEX
START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) = 110
END OF GROWIN3 SEASON (JULIAN DATE) = 296
JAN/JUL
39.00
72.00
NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURES, DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
FEB/AUG
40.50
72'00
MAR/SEP
47.00
66.50
APR/OCT
55.00
57.00
MAY/NOV
63.00
46.00
_RF 1ING CALCUf-ATIONS
FOR
YEAR
11
1A\i UP TO 200 MIN
ON
AN XT
WITHOUT
A MATH COPR[]CESSOR,
UP TO 20 MIN
ON
AN XT
WITH A
MATH COPRcCESS[}�, OR
UP TO 5 MIN
ON
AN AT
WITH A
MATH COPROCESSOR.)
JUN/DEC
70.00
39.00

P
7,13
I'll, i
t..l i d
AN d
W i i r-' ' J
f-i I I r-1 I=. H
Ul::
TO
i;
r'I I r,l
Or,l
A
, -
WITH A
MA l I-! (:lriPROC
UP
-17O
.5
111ki
ON
AN
!
vdl'TH A
Ni T i--f C..DPr-.00EESQR. ;
7R vI I NG CALCUL PIT I OIL. S
FOR
(Er1 i
_ .
Ir'i; C).i-"E UP
TO
?-}r:}
!` 11%4
ON
A I
XT
WITHOUT
A MA-1-Pi CQPROC-E`r-CJF=;,
UP
TO
MII`.I
ON
Ar-4
XT
WITH A
i'lATH COPI-'QCE:, =OR. CAR
U-'
TO
5
1�!I!.1
ON
AN
AT
MITI-i A
"fir-'iTI' t:,JPRI-?C;;SECJR
"RFORM T l'%IG CP)I..-CL!LAT'10NS
EOM=';
YEAR
4.
•A",Il Tf-i-:':E 1. P TO 2-C)) MIN
� t'!
s'if:l ;:T
I f? Ti I�.OI_1 T
� i 1E;Ti' COF`i;OCCG iOf;.
UP TO 2! r MI N
ON
Aril XT
WITH A
MATH COP1-11'3= SOR, OF'
UP TO ,_, MIN
Ora
€-pia A11-
WITH A
MATH )
PFCl R:l'! .I. NIG CA!
FCIR°
YLmAF°
IPiY TA1:E UP T
rd
C.Or,!
('N ;T
rITHOUT A MA'THI DJPf:'DCE7--'GOr;.
1J�'' "DD
2,--) M I N
ON
Pir-il XT
W I T1-1 A MP'tTI-I COPROCESSOR, OF-:
UP TOO
i 1I N
Ord
AN AT
WITH A III A TIF-I C0PR0CESS0R„ )
'k vjr t'.r :l '�' t3; ''}} y v!: Ir .€ v4 I ,I. yy� 1� �'t// j If �1� `` ..L vL .L� �.1 �.1 I I II.. 1 ..I:.1: I ..j. .L •.i I ,,11�� -.F 11,, LL ii '.b yyr ?I/ .�.
j, �. .I, 3', rlv .t, , r{. r,. ifi A, .j, }P .f, :i, ifi ,'� m T..� :f, :T..•h +P 9+ .jS ih .'�i r�. T .�:.�( :. .�. il. i�..�v 1i }i. i'4 :li .�� ,. �(• .I'` .ii .�� .. :P rlv :� .. i� }I� !ry � ., iF }r..'F. i� rl, ., .Y, .,
AVERAGE MOIN-i"HL_.Y VALUES 11\1 I rdCHE'O FOR YEARS'
PRECIPITATION'
T{O-r,ALF
STD. DEFY I i-i I- I ONG
RUNOFF
TC;'TAL._S
STD. DEVIATIONS
ar"ilydf ;�L FE-I• / iU5 r,lAR;rPEP APR;r,CT I"Ir'=1Y/NOV JUN,'OEC
J e .L .T
L n 3 F7
._ w rY 6
/7 . —S_J
IJ n �1•+,'�I
14
. I O
1 w 79
1. 7 .=
4. 48
1.20
_ . ^Ci .^
.tea 't^'ni'
..._. `t! .:
- . -1-98
1.7159
2. 0229
1 . C 6
{=} w .` 1.
2- #365
� . 719
1.9177
?
1 . _
_ . "t`
i . t_,.�4
1 . 0()E
EVAPOTRArylSP I RAT I ON
w 6,='2 21 952
LATERAL DF::A I NAGS F R01111 L )EF R _
l4f , 56.
Ci , '-i C
i _1 „ F

~
0.2381
O.2399
0.2328
0.2402
0.�I313
0.2372
�FD. DEVIATIONS
0.D59
552
0.0572
0.0537
0.Or�
0.0510
0.0515
0.0503
0,0476
0.0479
0.0450
0.0451
�ERCOLATZON FROM
-------------------------
LAYER 4
- '�LS
0.O000
0.0000
0.0000
0'0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
STD. DEVIATIONS
0.O000
0.0O00
0.0000
0.00O0
0.0000
0.O000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
O.0000
0.0000
1 17.*****************�***********�************�*�***********�****�*****
*AK*******�*********************************************
/ERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL'3 & (STD.
DEVIATIONS)
FOR
YEARS 1 THR0UGH 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(INCHES)
(CU. FT') �z:ERCENT
___________ _______
�RECIPITATION
------ _____________
67.79
< B.799)
246070. 100.00
�UWOFF
33.468
( 4.905)
121491. 49.37
�VAPOTRANSPIRATION
31.222
( 4.047)
113338. 46.06
-ATERAL DRAINAGE FROM
2.7152
( O.5981)
9856. 4.01
LAYER 3
::'E LATION FROM LAYER 4
0.00OO
< 0.0000}
O. �.O0
-�HANGE IN WATER STORAGE2.198)
1386. 0.56
**************** Ilk Al*******
******
FEAK DAILY VALUES
FOR YEARS'
1 THROUGH
5
_______________________________________
(INCH2S)
(CU. FT.}
PRECIPITATION
2.92
1()599.6
RUNCFF
2.313
8396.6
LATERAL DRAINAGE FROM LAYER
3
0.0093
33.8
PERCOLATION FROM LAYER
4
0.0000
0.0
HEAD ON LAYER 4
�1.9
SNOW WATER
3.06
11096.B
MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER
(VOL/VOL)
0.3190
MINIMUM VEG. S0IL WATER
(VOL/VOL)
�'1155

'
FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 5
'------------------------------------------------------------
LAYER (INCHES)' (VOL/VOL)
________ _________
1 �.86 0.2442
2 114'51 0.29B2
3 10.94 0.3039
4 0.40 0.4000
SNOW WATER' 0.00
*************************************************�*******************
*************************
5 SELECT OUTPUT OPERATTON:
|TER 3 TO RUN THE SIMULATION AND OBTAIN DETAILED OUTPUT,
4 TO HUN THE .3IMULA7ION AND OBTAIN ONLY SUMMARY OUTPUT, OR
5 TO STOP THE PROGRAM.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ally 16, 1.990
Mr.. Neil. Emory
Transyl.vani.a County
28 East Main Street
Br:evard, North Car.ol.ina 2871.2
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Permit Number. 3770
Pump and Haul.
Transylvania County L,andfil.l
Leachate Disposal System
Tr:Drr y.l.vania County
Dear Mr. Ernorv:
In accordance with your application received June 2.5, 1990, we
are forwarding herewith Permit No. 3770, dated July 9, 1990, to
Transyl.vani.a County f..or the construction and operation of a pump and
Haui wastewater col.l.ection and tL-anspor:t systern to transport leachate
from the Transylvania Co,.rnty F,and.f_i .1-1 to the City of Brevard wastewater:.
Treatment Fac_, i 1-i.ty -
This permit shall. he effective fr:om the date of issrlarrce until
June 30, 1.995, and shall he suhject. l-o the condition, and
limitations as specif_ied thei:ei.n. 1?.i.eace' pay part.i.cu-1_ar attention to
the monitoring t-equire-ments in this perrnil_. Failure to establish nn
adequate system for: �-ol.l,ect i.nq and maintaining the required opersti.ona.l
information w.11..l. result m) ftit-Alre camplj:gnc:e pr.obl.ems-
If ally parts, t eq�_ri.r emf.nts, or: I _rld_t.at.iorrs c;ontrained in this
per:m-i.t- are t_rrraccepl-OAn 1.n you, you have the right to request. an
adjrld i cator:y hear-ing iipon w1:i tterl rearrest: wi. Lbi.n 30 clays fol.lowi ng
receipt of this ]�er:m.l t _ Thy request: Imil ,i: l)e All the form of a written
Petition, conforming to Chapter 1,5013 o` Mouth Carolina Geneva] -
Statutes, and fi_1_ed wi-t-.h r-.lie nffire of A,Jmi.TAj.st_ra.tive Fleaci.ngs, F. 0.
Box 1.1666, Raleigh, N. C. 2.7604. Unless finch demands are made, this
permit slla Z 1 he f i_ni 1 and hinding-
Pollution Preverrdon rays
f .O. Box Z7687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Teiephone 919-733-7015
An Ulwil Opportunity AAinnvive Action Frnployet

Neil'Emory
July , 1990
Page Two
One set of approved plans and specifications is being .forwarded
to you. If you need additional information concerning this matter,
please contact Mr. Gary Tweed at 704/251-62.08 in the Asheville Regional
Office.
Sincerely,
George T. Everett
xc : Transylvania County Health Depa r. tmen t
Gary T. Tweed

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
PUMP AND HAUL PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of: Article 21 of Chapter 143,
General Statutes of. North Carolina as amended, and other applicable
Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Transylvania County Board of Commissioners
Transylvania County
FOR THE
construction and operation of a leachate pump and haul wastewater
collection and transport system to serve the 'Transylvania County
Landfill with no discharge of_.wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to
the application received June 25, 1990, and in conformity with the
project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently
filed and approved by the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural. Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until
June 30, 1995, and shall be subject to the following specified
conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the subject pump and
haul activities are carried out in a manner_ which has been
approved by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and
volume of wastes described in the application and other
supporting data.
3. The facilities shall he properly maintained and operated at all
times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire
for the facilities to change ownership, or there is a name change
of the Permittee, a formal permit r.equest must be submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application
fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting
materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request
will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
5_ No type of wastewater other than leychate from the Transylvania
County Landfill shall be included in the pump and haul activities.

6. The permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between
Transylvania County and the City of Brevard .for the collection,
transportation, and ultimate d:i.sposal of the landfill leachate is
in full force and effect.
7. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily,
including the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall
cease operation of a.11 pump and haul activities and take such
immediate corrective action as may be required by this Division.
8. Application for renewal of this permit shall be made within 180
days of expiration. Results of a priority pollutant analysis on a
representative sample o£ the leachate shall be included with
application for renewal of the permit.
9. Monitoring shall be conducted at a minimum of once per quarter.
for BOD5, COD, TSS, metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel,
lead, zinc, iron, -magnesium, and mercury), arsenic, pH, and fecal
coliform. Prior to the discharge of the first load of leachate to
Brevard's wastewater treatment facility, the permittee will
collect an appropriate sample of the leachate and analyze for EP
toxicity. Should the EV toxicity test indicate the leachate is
hazardous waste, dispos.al of the existing leachate material must
be in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Discharge
to the City's system of any leachate characterized legally as
hazardous is prohibited. Provided the initial EP toxicity test
result is non -hazardous, the permittee shall provide at a minimum
one additional EP toxicity sample result at the time reissuance of
the permit is requested. Results of monitoring shall be forwarded
to this Division and the City of Brevard. The permittee shall
conduct any additional monitoring of the leachate as deemed
necessary by the Division or the City of Brevard.
10. The Asheville Regional Office, telephone number 704/251-6208,
shall_ be notified at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of
operation of the pump and haul activities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional
supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours from 8:00
a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
11. The Permi.ttee is liable for any damages caused by a spill or
failure of the pump and haul operations.
12. Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall_ be provided
by the Permit tee to _insure proper operation of the subject
facilities.
13. The Permi.ttee or hi.s designee shall inspect the leachate
collection and stowage faci.l.i.Ves t.o prevent malfunctions and
deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or
lead to the release of: wastes to the environment, a threat to
human health, or a nuisance_ The iPerrmittee shall keep an
inspection log or summary i.nclmding it least the date and time of:
inspection, obserrvati.ons made, and any maintenance, repairs, or
corrective actions taken by the Per:mi ttee. This log of.

inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for as long as
the pump and haul activities are being conducted and shall be made
available upon request to the Division of Environmental Management
or other permitting authority.
14. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the
Division of Environmental Management may, upon presentation of
credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on
or related to the leachate collection and storage facilities at
any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with
this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept
under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may obtain
samples.
15. An accurate record of the pump and haul activities must be
maintained by the Permittee, indicating:
a) date leachate is removed from the facility,
b) volume of leachate removed.
These records shall be made available upon request to the Division
of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
16. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in
this permit may subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by
the Division of Environmental Management in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
17- The issuance of this permit does not: preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or
ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies
(local, state and federal) which have jurisdiction.
1.8. The Permittee shall provide for the installation and maintenance
of facilities necessary to prevent overfilling of the leachate
storage tanks such that a discharge to ground or surface waters
would occur-
19. A leakage test shall- be performed on the storage tanks. Storage
tanks should have no visible leakage- The engineer's certification
will serve as proof of compliance with this condition.
20- A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be
maintained on file by the Permittee for the life of the project.
21. Non -Compliance Notification:
The Permittee shall_ report by telephone to the Asheville Regional
Office, at telephone number 704j251--6208, as soon as possible,
but in no case more than 24 hours or oil the next working day
following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of
any of the following:
a. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons,
that render the facility incapable of collection, storage,
and transport of the leachate.

h. Any failure of a pumping station, Sewer line, etc. resulting
in a by-pass directly to receiving waters without treatment
of all or any portion of the influent to such station or-
facility -
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a
written report in letter form within 15 days following first
knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions
taken or proposed to be token to ensure that the problem does not
recur.
22. Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of the
subject pumb and haul activities, a certification must be received
form a professional engineer certifying that the permitted
facilities have been installed in accordance with this permit, the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the certification to the
Permits and Engineering Unit, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh,
N. C. 2761.1-7687.
23. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the
Permittee within thirty (30) days after being billed by the
Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause the
Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by
15 NCAC 2H.0205 (n)(4).
Permit issued this theq 7*t day 0§01 2 , 1990.
NORTH CARW I NA ENVIRONMENTAL, MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
George T- veret:t-.; Di.�,Pr.i.or
Division of. Enviuonmenta.i- Management
By Authority of the Environmental. Management Commission

Permit Number 3770
1990
Engineer's Certification
as a duly registered
Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having been
authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time) the construction
of the project,
for
(Project)
(Name of Location)
the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due
care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction
such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plats and specifications.
Signature
Date
.— Registration No.

R

i J f U �' %° '1UI i j
ij
FEET
���r
o n
ti r,I Lmt-
f�1 �`�'/� ���f{y
�3����30• ; . � r,r.
Allul-
520,000 0 C,r s �•
N. C. FEET
N.
3886 y � y h ¢, r r + �. ,�r, '7 .,. � c, • � 14' - ...'•t#.•' n.... ,jqy <�•
t �•� v� � R000 ,�� _ y' .�' q� eA y
38 r v P. -o r 1 �.® y�J- ` •I '¢"-�'1 P �i , u{ t �"`i
85 I ��T l a� l-[� e, .e �.,r, :Pi t�,.. T�1' �! 1 ,.-a":1 � '1 I .:.1 �,.''�: Y ; � l /l. ! =v ':�.•, q , „� .�

3891
1889
I
Ci
3885
61
fY , q.
0

9
I
om
0,
92gE
—= -- 'O'N
am,DZG
'N-w000Mi
,OF-00�3� C
6vu
USE

0
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
28 LAST MAIN STREET
POST OFFICE. BOX 666
BREVARA N. C. 28712
PHONE [phone]
July 5, 1990
Mr. Gary Tweed
Environmental Management Division
59 Woodfin Street
Asheville, N. C. 28801
RE: Leachage Disposal. Contract
Dear Mr. Tweed,
Enclosed is a copy of the agreement between the City of Brevard
and Transylvania County dated April 17, 1990. This agreement
details the arrangement by which the City Waste Water plant will
treat the leachate collected at the new sanitary landfill.
Please let me know if there is any further information required
by your office.
Sincerely,
Will Sagar
Landfill. Supervisor
WS:gc
Enc.
RECEIVED
Water 4�upt't section
JUL 9 -1990
,Asheville RegiGnal• Office'
Asheville, North Caroling
"An Er1ual Opportunity Employer"

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF TRANSYLVANIA
A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this the 17th day of April,
1990, by and between TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, a North Carolina municipal
corporation, hereinafter called the "County", and the CITY OF BREVARD, a
North Carolina municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City";
W I T N E S S E T H
THAT WHEREAS, the County has undertaken to develop a new sanitary
landfill for the beneficial use of all citizens of the County, including
all City residents, and continues to this date in its efforts to secure all
necessary state permits for the operation of such a facility, and,
WHEREAS, the disposal of leachate from the new landfill is a extremely
important and integral part of the permitting process and eventual
operation of the landfill facility which is critical for the County and the
securing of a state permit related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City has received a written request from the County
seeking permission to use the Brevard Wastewater Treatment Plant for the
proposed receipt, treatment and disposal of the subject landfill leachate
pursuant to the terms and conditions of a joint City/County contract and
agreement to be developed and negotiated by the two respective governmental
units; and,
WHEREAS, the governing body of the City has officially expressed -its
intent to accept and approve the County's request and has directed the
drafting of the applicable contract and agreement as identified herein, and
the City and County each now desire to enter into an agreement providing
for the terms and conditions for landfill leachate disposal at the Brevard
Wastewater Treatment Plant; and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of this agreement is to contribute to the
provision of sanitary landfill services to the citizens of the City and
County whereby a suitable method of leachate disposal may be attained as
mutually agreed upon by the City and County in accordance with the terms of
this agreement and the Brevard City Code - specifically the City's Sewer
Use Ordinance;
E

Leachate Agreement
Page Two
April 17, 1990
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed among the parties of this agreement as
follows:
1. The City will receive, treat and dispose of leachate from the
County's new sanitary landfill now under construction off Frozen
Creek in Transylvania County, North Carolina in accordance with
the provisions, tests and conditions of this
agreement.
2. Nothing within this agreement shall be construed to negatively
act upon the operation of the Brevard Wastewater Treatment Plant
and the federal, state and local funding thereof; nor, shall
anything within this agreement act to jeopardize the City's NPDFS
Permit to operate the Brevard Wastewater Treatment facilities and
the discharge to the French Broad River as authorized by the
City's permit. 1n all respects, the Brevard City Code, and more
specifically the City's Sewer Use ordinance, shall govern the
receipt, treatment and disposal of leachate authorized by this
contract.
3. The Brevard Wastewater Treatment Plant and its appurtenant
facilities must actually be capable of receiving and adequately
treating the sanitary landfill leachate for disposal and
discharge, all in accordance with the NPDES Permit by which said
plant and facilities operate; otherwise, this agreement will
became null and void without prejudice to either of the agreein(
parties.
4. Leachate disposal at the Brevard Wastewater Treatment facilities
must not in any way or form adversely effect the functioning or
operation of said facilities as may be determined by the
Superintendent of the Brevard Utility Plants; otherwise this
agreement may be nullified and voided upon thirty days (30)
written notice to the County that such effects are being
experienced and the City desires to terminate said contract for
such cause.
5. The leachate from the landfill shall be delivered in batch form
with each and every batch to be tested for monitoring purposes as
may from time to time be prescribed by the Superintendent of the
Brevard Utility Plants. The cost and expense of such testing
shall be at the sole expense of the County.
6. The City reserves the right and sole discretion to accept or
refuse any particular batch of leachate delivered at the Brevard
Wastewater Treatment Facilities based upon test or monitoring
results which may be found by the City to be unacceptable.
7. The County shall make provisions at its sanitary landfill to
accommodate storage of leachate should same be rejected for
receipt and disposal at the Brevard Wastewater Treatment
Facilities. Further, the County shall also endeavor to address
the possibility that this agreement may at some date become null
and void requiring either other arrangements for leachate
disposal, or the on -site treatment and disposal of leachate at
the landfill.
8. The cost of leachate delivery, testing and monitoring as
referenced in Section 5 of this agreement, and all other extra-
ordinary expenses associated with leachate disposal at City
facilities shall be borne solely by the County.

Leachate Agreement
Page Three
April 17, 1990
9. The County agrees and forever binds itself, its successors and
assigns to hold the City harmless and to fully and completely
indemnify the City against, and pay promptly upon demand
therefor, any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action,
losses, expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees
at regulatory, trial and appellate levels), costs {including,
without limitations, court hosts and expenses), damages, and all
liabilities arising out of or related to or incurred in
connection with the discharge at any time by the County or by its .
agents or employees, or by anyone acting on behalf of the County
of leachate or any wastewater, effluent or substance of any kind
or character related thereto into the City's Sewer System or
facilities.
10. This agreement may be terminated by either party by giving thirty
(30) days written notice to the other, and, further, the City may
immediately terminate this agreement upon seventy-two (72) hours
written notice to the County should the County be found in non-
compliance with any provision of this agreement or should the
County's discharge to the Pretreatment Facility be determined to
jeopardize or violate the City's NPDES Permit by which it
operates the Brevard Sewer System. The City reserves the sole
and absolute right and discretion to terminate this agreement.
11. This agreement shall be controlled and governed by the laws of
the State of North Carolina and the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Brevard.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement in
duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each party the day and
year first above written.
AT'TEST:'r'
Glenda W. Sansosti
City Clerk
,ATTEST:
_ A17--nr_ L QiJ itL
Sandra Jameso
County Clerk
CITY OF BREVARD
bkw� Lza,--)
Katherine E. Anderson
Mayor
IYLVANIA COUNTY }
-.yL
K. Smart, Jr. U
man I
i

Leachate Agreement
Page Four
April 17, 1990
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF TRANSYLVANIA
1, 7'0 w ° J , a Notary Public of the County and
State afore id, certify that Glenda W. Sansosti, personally came before me
this day and acknowledged that she is City Cleric for THE CITY OF BREVARD, a
North Carolina municipal corporation, and that by authority duly given and
as the act of this corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its
name by its Mayor, sealed with its corporate seal, and attested by its City
Clerk.
Witness my hand and official seal, this 11
� day of ,
1990.
Notary -Public
My Commission Expires:
7Y1 at cj. 3 (9 9a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF TRANSYLVANIA
I , ),_ a Notary Public of the County and
State aforesaid certify that Sandra Jameson, personally came before me this
day and acknowledges] that she is County Clerk for TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, a
North Carolina municipal corporation, and that by authority duly given and
as the act of this corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its
name by its Chairman, sealed with its corporate seal, and attested by its
County Clerk.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this /C- day of 7)-7O,f4 ,
1990.
Notary Publit
My Commission Expires:
1c-0,/-/`7`7,1
Filed for registration on the day of , 1990 at
o'clock `.M. and registered and verified on the day of
, 1990 in Book No. of Page
Register of Deeds
Transylvania County

I
R
/'D �e4Jp j
ZIW7 -
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 28, 1984
W. Lee Fleming 11
Forrest R. Westall
�I
Steve W. Tedder 5s
Landfill Evaluations
RECEIVED
Water Quality Division :.
OCT 2 1984
Western Regional Office
Asheville, North Carolina
On August 9, 1984, correspondence was sent from your office to -each
of the regional offices requesting information on landfill operations.
It was requested that each regional office evaluate approximately three
sites. On August 13, 1984, I sent additional guidance to the regions
concerning the types of samples and analysis to be included in this
evaluation.
As you can see from the attached table, eighteen leachates from six-
teen landfills have been sampled to date. All regions except Fayetteville
evaluated at least two Landfills and the vast majority of the data expected
was obtained. The attached table lists all the data to date, except the
organics which are still being processed.
The results available would indicate this exercise to be very infor-
mative. Fifteen of the eighteen leachates were evaluated for acute toxicity
with seven of the fifteen indicating toxic conditions with three being
extremely toxic. values of concern differ by landfill but in general the
following warrant mention:
BOD
2.5 -
66,000
mg/l
COD
12.0 -
43,000
mg/1
Turgidity
7.8 -
1,400
NTU
Grease & Oil
1.0 -
2,700
mg/l
Phenols
5.0 -
6,500
ug/l
NH3
0.3 -
960
mg/1
Aluminum
100.0 -
15,000
ug/l
Cobalt
100.0 -
2,000
ug/l
Iron
500.0 -
22,000,000
ug/l
Nickel
100.0 -
1,200
ug/l
ZZA C
20.0 -
100,000
ug/l
D.�.
.05 -
8.0
ug/1

W. Lee Fleming - 2 - September 28; 1984
Based on the data reviewed, it would appear that instream impacts
are occuring at several sites. Biologist of the Technical Services Unit
will begin immediately to evaluate instream biota at the following sites:
Meck. Co. Harrisburg Rd. Landfill
Meck Co. Old Statesville Av. Landfill
Hanes Mill Landfill
High Point Landfill
Upon the completion of the biological analysis a more detail report
will be available. This correspondence is to update you as to the progress
of this evaluation.
SWT/gh
Attachment
a

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 9, 1984
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Regional Engineers
THRU: Regional Superl7isors
FROM: W. Lee Fleming, Jr. Orrginal S,sne Zy
SUBJECT: Request for Information on
Landfill Operations
In a recent meeting with the Director, it came to my attention that the
Water Quality Section needs to obtain information associated with water
quality adjacent to landfill sites across the State. For this reason, I
would appreciate your input into a comprehensive report concerning water
quality impacts of landfill operations.
To begin our report, I would appreciate you forwarding any information
which you have in your files concerning leachate or water quality impacts from
landfill operations. This information should be gathered together and forwarded
to my office for review and further discussion. Secondly, I will ask Steve
Tedder to coordinate with each of you specific sampling of sites which you
suspect to be impacted by leachate from landfill operations. This sampling
program should be accomplished no later than September 1, 1984, and should be
at approximately three (3) sites in each of your regions. Generally, monitoring
of these sites should :investigate conventional and toxic pollutants and should
contain upstream and downstream information sufficient to indicate the source of
the waste entry.
As the monitoring program is conducted, I would appreciate slides being
taken of landfill sites and receiving waters. These slides will be used by our
Section in a presentation to the Secretary concerning landfill effects on
surface water quality.
Should questions arise concerning this request, please feel free to contact
my office as soon possible. Additionally, should questions arise concerning the
monitoring program which I have requested, please feel free to contact Steve
Tedder.
cc: Paul Wilms
Forrest .4estall
Alan Klimek
Steve Tedder

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 13, 1984
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional .Engineers
THRU: Forrest R. Westall
FROM: Steve W. Tedder M
SUBJECT: Landfill Water Quality Evaluations
Previous correspondence from W. Lee Fleming, dated August 9, 1984,
was sent to initiate evaluations of selected landfill operations through-
out the state. This memorandum is to provide additional guidance for
these evaluations.
The selection of landfills to be evaluated has been left at the
discretion of the respective regional offices. The initial guidance
indicates that three areas should be evaluated by each region. It is
therefore requested that the areas of study be identified. Maps should
be submitted to my office indicating the location of the landfills, and
point(s) of entry of t:he leachate, with the receiving waters indicated_
The initial phase of sampling will address only leachate for chemical
evaluations. Based on the collectors evaluation one or two leachate
samples are to be collected for chemical analysis. No instream sample
collections are to be accomplished at this time. The attached laboratory
sheet indicates the parametric coverage for each of these samples. The
sample sites dust be given numbers for future reference and the station
locations clearly described on the lab sheet.
in addition grab samples are also cc be collected for _axis_ -
screening• The amounts to be collected and the _...__ect_cn =tui.._._
are the same :s for affluent screening _ i1ac=ns. As collac0cr
daces are scheduled, please notify Ken: Eagleson at 33-213E to
preparation time for the toxicity screening tests.
It is requested that the landfilis to :e avaluaced be identified and
site Naps submitted by 8/21 64. All collections mould he ..ompieted by
9 `/ 4.
Uuon receipt of the site identifications, Technical Services will
schedole tizinizai surveys to assess vastream - _ownstream evai_a0son.s.

r Regional. Engineers - 2 - Ar —s t 13, 1984
To meet the time requirements it is mandatory that each office
make this project of highest priority. If there are any questions,
please contact Steve Tedder at 733-5083.
SWT/gh
cc: W. Lee Fleming
Ken Eagleson
Ed Hargrave
tv. !P

1
4
i
t
7
e
1C
11
17
13
14
15
16
11
18
19
20
A
B
iQ!1Uu ULULOPMtN1,t4�1
DIVISION OF II r k
RiPONI r0 AND, FRQ MRO 400 WORO�WiRo W5R0 IS
WATER HA(14V�I!f
Other _14I Ai: j
Shipped by But, Courier. Other •
C9iiF�14Lfii ❑AMBUNI ,`hy114N
800 RANGE SEED-
C1110RINAIED.
;I
TAt MANAGEMENT
1B FORM (OM I)
0 PAlf Rj(4EVjQIlme
RC{ d by L F1 Ul - C oyfier
DATA ENTRY BY: CK;
0SPlit ❑COMPLIANCE DAIE REPORTED
4,4 k 5
Slar,on
NumFs�r-- Dole Begin
yylmm/
lime eg n
Dale n "!i ' '
.. .i r i•
!'"�r{
Time
En
DepthpM 6B UBM
Va ue type
A H L
Composite
I 6 8
Samp a type
C G GNXX
y--
Chl r' 4 "I: i r '�r�.} IL
_
NH -as N 610 met
jli ^�f i[4e1 i067 _
iUl) Hr 0
Arsenic. IOlpl 14JQZ `'','�"-'�+'u$1
iKN' as N 67S m
P - r
_/}
c ()D lo.v m !i
Chl a' Ir' 3� I ( I I' ir /I
NO *NO as N 616 m !
-
9
_/
f/
l'ul�lorm sF Poll?, I 1 0ml
Chl U Corr Q I�I''`u !
�
FOj a: P 1050/ m /l
I
_-
Cuhl�]rnLMF lorsl :lJSol _ 1100nsl'
_ _
In -lint 10 s
%.�Wa' n N41 fp,ol JW5 IJoon j
Color' Iru• BQ -Co
P' 0;% olv•d as P 646 m /
Cyblor 1u6e 12121 11505 1100m1
�_
Chromium, l le..i032 u !I
A - Silver 1017
X•]:dJ,v lo1a15OU
Lyanida 710 mg11
✓
AI - Aluminum 1105 u 71
_ ,nry71
Volar+le 50%
Tom.
F i e 251 mg,I
8• - Ber ilium 1012 1
v
Scan Organochlorin•
-_myi/I
—
Ca -- Cul,ww916 `09/1
Scan Or ono hos horus
T" _
_N,sd�t_}usprnd_•d,�10 _ ,�` rrltl!/f
G,gosv and Gilt 6 m /I
Cd-- C dmium 1077 u /
akin :lolal -J()O m /l
Co- Cobalt 1037 uall
-
Oroanics Specilically
—_
Yololrlr 53S /I
_rrj]
540 r+afl
MBAJ 38760 m !I
Chromiunc. Iotat 1019
/
ON 40' unit%
thon If 32730 u 11
_✓Cu-Coppeo
1042 u /
►�
Scon Bate / Neutral Ex4racl 1
A LI!_J. _IQ j2h 5 4.16 n%�/4
5u1fale 945 1 -01
Fe- Ir n 1045 uk/ I
e%
Cnn A[i --E.4,ac1
�c
O cidtr to P1483 43S
lfid• 745
AlsuirnrlXlo pH 3 41S rn$%1
Specific Cond.9SuMhoi/cry+-
li - 01hium1131 u 1
$ eClal nalysil SpecAirclity
_
AiLui-0, ogpH1.54IU_ nr97_I
Biomass;Dr WI. 73 'I /
Mg-M.9.lrium927
2
Biomass' P 6 A 72 '• i /
�miy/l
Mn - Man anus 1055 !I
Scon Acid herbicides
IOi_9a11 g/I
-
Iwb. d. 1, 16� _ _ Nlll
-
--
_
2
Chl a, Peri Flwp BZ 51% : �' + mg/
�N
- Sodiuns 979 m /
Scan Pureables
c
Sompl'ng Pornl
P1
Wolof temper alur•(;C)
D I�--- /
100
pH
400
o s11 age
Ailiolinily
Pit 0-3 pH 4,5.
87244 4.-0
Acidify
PH 4.S / PH 6.3
82241 82244
Se'(h� IM•lers)
r
Ai, Temps, mur•('C1
20
0 O 't Soluralion
Wl
SoNaily t.
'
480 Iti'1'? ��,�'
A gqP: oaring Mal%
5ever4fy,
.1� �1i
i 132
Precip+lalionllnlDayl
4 32
Cloud Covov%
Wind DireCilan(D•g }
36
Wind Forte
B.auloil
37
1 Hr Sull•o •
Mon•rlmllilHrl
50086
D•o Fit
S•wr+lY
1340
twbidily Severity
1150
Oder: AlmosperR"1 +:
Severity - - .,
1330`�il :'•`.'
"'
1eY�[
i 1�
pw
''
t •'
Delergent Sv s
Sav•nry Sev•ritY
1305 1300
Oi -Grease
Floating D• rl%
S•reejly
1345
Sludge Swerily
1315
DMI/Revised 10/82
• ] . n.'t •-J':. a ,.: •a-iT.>ann411 ..;-r: /4N: „vaah :�. t .a saian•.s

c1
i -���
�.I �
��������
S�
I�I� �I����
�f � •�=!�
a��l�
A
� � I� iY
1 0;�.,
l� I �l �.��� !",�I�"��a1��1
r
3�
l � n �e �. �, %,► �. �,9,u �, 1 j S
1 13 3`10
K
j 1r�o
1 �9 { y°
I
j K
19 ao
' 02
1-4
"o
I K
I K
1<
9l PDO
x /do
30
oZo
I .lt.v �. Co • a 1I
70 I1Yo6
Xw
LTao
I glmo
I ,V,
K
K (, 35I
15o rSo
•77
•Or a -a
ISOOD
K
K
K
Ito
%4'-1
K
IYO
C7
d n. �l
130 y5oo
80
3300
Tw
yaU
K
n {
lil:f 74
OS
.01 /, 54
4-
K
K
K
3 0
33 r #O
K, K
3. a
is.?
l,xp,
i eu II
�,c ••• .� s, ?I
15.8 I �3
K
Flo
,1
3bo
k
K K to
f<
K 16.34.7
' -off
K
<
it,
K
35 174,-
Ki K
sie
so 1.�
G.3
l�
r yo aS
I !,c
7;o -n
I i?o I
K
I K K r I Iv
K
K 1 3•, 1�,r:
I. o I
I K I, as
I K I K
I
K
i !<
Ire
I k
,2o
K I K I �cs
f8 y
G.,l
//,e
r k
I f<
I -�70 17
13 9
K
I K K ! !S
k
IK . b91 d. 7
1 . or
or ay
K I x I
l<
I 1K
I K
ro,'pO
I K
// 4X'O 1
7 3
yia
4,a. X, i l <5
;Yho 13360
—/0
(y I ra°
Jaw 1
K
1 K r30
xf
I K J3 1 36
I •3 y
1 K / /
I 9x I x I 1�
K
I K 60,90 17
WO I x 1K 13/0
I 1 15.6,l
�.11 Div. a
)9, Soo 6P°
0 n
7,9 I X
I K I 1 17
1 K
1 i5 7a 7a
� y.L
0 3� I a°°
K K1
K 30 I �3°e � It I
I r3a° 11< �
70
1.12
I S"C i 3 II,7D
i Y5o <
K
I .74 I Sicn
I !< I
K
I k 17 6.7 I1-30I !< I K
I K A 7 `Z°
b•'/I Id50
J
Co • La..�1 , !I sea 6� 15 5
13•& 7 15cb
5o I /ao
5v I K
(� 1 / /<
K
I K 5 I ay
05
1 x c3
11<
K r<
X.
! 7r�° I K 9.1 yso K
f< I 7 0
�, 7 3 yo
^ b .LANd l! ;,AWc
I �cso 7lv
I r<
rr�v i ;.f0
�w i4
I /K 1C 13 aac
13y
I Y :,7 1 ;
,�,.�
; '05 + -.5c,
yt K
j r.
,� 5Ca I 11 F ,0 �r�� K ,
-c
261
?�:,
�h%cv. a. .a ��,1 �� eirLoro
5 r7
1{
150 l
17 J�.
K /0.
3o
I I� 3o .3
�(
di
I ;av
K I X
K
I f< ? ° rt z.1 /r0 1 K
�U
L•5 /�`
I
"., ,.:
rrtros�rck, Ca • �� 04 Nc
I goo
Sao
Yam I Zee
11ZOO 47
K K y Iso
5w
I .� SI I ✓ 6
.ia
5.0 I�
K I x
I It /y°'° �• 36 1760 K I.
��
I o7� 3. �}
! - 341590
GW Co . �,(e 11
153 '70 1
Yr0
.zro
b
y 4 K
K I{ U2 K
!°
K 7,3
.41�1
1<,
KJ
f< 51100 K
7. /
I ZO aT 73
0 Su,{ � ,,KW'-
IS-0 �rz
50
3-21)
I
I'� K
K K K
J
I K 1
y+
aG I
/�
fC
I
A090 K •y K
I S. r
17, y JV/ /n
.�{°� S.a 1r�
% �,� ✓r1, 7/ ,Q �.0 }c j l < 5
�.°� T3
K
36,°°°
530
NCO
tC ,zoo G3ao
7ro
9G0
g(,o
. 7$
..Z1
rl
?0 zO
aye
K � �
$oo P°'� aw 10
uo
170
7
17
50
-05 -0
` i+coo
'3001.30
1
Soo
l< 1 55 i5co;
aa°
y�
(-4W
.951
•a.z 3.5
00"
K K
160 I
W f° °o0I
2 o 15 Sao r°6
3
7�
�. �.� u,• �
dN
�
i
�
I
I I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
I I
I
i
I I
I
i
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
44I

�
STANDARDS
PARAMETER %DWA NCDHR NCDNRCD
~�D5 MG/L
h
' } MG/1
wECAL /180ML
T.COLIFORM 000ML
T.RES. MG/L
T%% MG/L
PH
ALKALINITY
COD MG/L
| D.O. MG/L
l TEMP CENT.
/ TUC MG/1-
TURBIDITY NTU
CHLORIDE MG/I
250
ARSENIC UG/L 50
50
COLOR
CYANIDE MG/L
0.2
FLUORIDE MG/L 1.8
1.5
T.HARDNE%% MG/|
MBA% MG/L
PHENOLS UG/L
SULFATE MG/L
250
SULFIDE MG/L
SPECIFIC COND.UMHO%/CM
NO2+NO3-N MG/L
`-P MG/L
'VER UG/L 50
50
BARIUM UG/L WOO
iOOO
BERYLLIUM UG/L
CALCIUM MG/L
CADMIUM UG/L iO
10
COBALT UG/L
CHROMIUM UG/L 50
50
COPPER UG/L
iOO.)
IRON UG/L
3000
MERCURY UG/L 2
2
SODIUM MG/L
MANGANESE UG/L
NICKEL UG/L
LEAD UG/L 58
50
ZINC UG/L
5000
SELENIUM MG/L .Oi
.01
T.DI%.GA% %%AT
LAS MG/L
DI%.%OLID% MG/L
580
ENDRIN UG/L .2
LINDANE UG/L 4
METHOXYCHLOR UG/L iOO
TOXAPHENE UG/L 5
2,4-D MG/L .i
7.4,5-TP MG/L .Oi
)RIN UG/L
..,LORDANE UG/L
DDT UG/L
DIELDRIN UG/L
ENDO%ULFAN UG/L
GUTHION UG/L
1000
5000
6-8.5
5.O
29MAX
50
30
.0i
.2
500
.O3
.Oi
.O3
.8O5
.i
.003
.Oi
.00i
.003
.003
.8i
TRAN%YLVANIA
COUNTY
LANDFILL
1-23-80 12-8-81
8-03-83
8-16-83
8-20-84
}31
>130
i7O
i4O
230
250
<i0
<iO
<i0
452
560
720
47
47
72
6.9 6.1
6.8
6.7
6.4
170 439
'
140
iiO i80
iiO iOO
<iO <i0
(.O2 <.0i
250 320
iO
<5
<.O2
<.O1
i14O
<.05
.07
.01,
<.05
<.Oi
<5O
<50
(iOOO
(50
39
130
<50
<50
<20
<2O
000
<100
000
<i0O
<50
<50
<50
<58
<40
<40
<28
<20
3,200
20,008
24,00O
80,000
<.O5
<0.2
i6O
50
91400
170,000
14,000
22,000
<188
<iOO
<iWO
<iOO
<i0O
<100
<10O
<50
<50
<20
20
1020
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

HEPTACHLOR
U.G/L
.00i
MIREX UG/L
PARATHION
UG/L
.04
"uMETON UG/L
.1
B UG/L
.881
RADIUM 226
PIC/L
15
RADIUM 228
PIC/L
5
STRONTIUM
90 PIC/L
80
TRITUM PIC/L
20,008
NOTE: ND = NON DETECTED
---.... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... _.... .... .... .... ---- ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
IN THE AUGUST 8, 1904 SAMPLE
THE FOLLOWING COMPOUNDS WERE IDENTIFIED BY
MATCHING TO LIBRARY MASS
SPECTRA.
CONCENTRATIONS ARE ESTIMATED.
METHYL PROPANOICACID
20
UG/L
HEXANOIC ACID 530 UC/L
BUTANOIC ACID
56
UG/L
METHYL HEXANOICACID 280 UG/L
METHYL BUTANOICACID
170
UG/L
PENTANOICACID
320
UG/L
METHYL PENTANOICACID
290
UG/L
^

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
August 20, 1984
rArm v2ANniim
TO: Steve W. Tedder, Supervisor,
Technical Services Unit
THROUGH: Roy M. Davis,
Regional Supervisor
��"�
Heath P. Dobson, P.E.,
Regional Engineer
FROM: Gary T. Tweed, P.E.,
Asheville Regional Offic-
-��*
SUBJECT: Landfill Water Quality Evaluations
Attached are location maps of the Buncombe, Translyvania, and Henderson
County landfills. Extensive work has been done on the Transylvania County
landfill under the 208 Program. Attached are some past sampling data at that
site. The proposed dates for sampling are as follows:
Henderson County August 22, 1984
,Transylvania County August 22, 1934
Buncombe County August 20, 1984
Should there be any questions, please advise.
GTT/pf
cc: Groundwater Section
Attachments

Lill 1.715�,,1'
PISZIArr FozES7, jcnml vCCe
NATIC!,,AL 'IS.H KkTCMERY FLEv. 3.1-10 ­o., ce
Lj
CEDAR ROCK TA.
-10
WW1,
mo�� ck
ty- THREE FORKS M7,4,
TtN-ESSU n%4
-72."s Y4 L1,49A.11
Ch. •7.3
'In
n-
OWE'4S
G S" 91.
St
59
11-7 arg
I -A S,
FRV, CH
3. 2
X.
COLD K%K
1;3, 76%
_L5Ll IL LV;
z t
2.7
215
2
/fl
pin
ca� 4
47
2- S.M��AAN
!goo 1.31 �U
2
pp OXAWAY
7 1 31
10
N :A N T A M A L A
S6 A W.4 7
4 7
JJ U 4,
t 13, Q
62
3-
3
41
Sqph.;a 7n
-7
3
N A T I O N A L
4 17
FDA S T .4 0 WHITE -7H
7 t4
SASSAFRAS MIN
A
ys�
WHITE IVA TER
14
FA U-S
0

N�
�
%TA
ARD%
TRAN%YLVANIA
COUNTY LANDFILL
PARAMETER %DWA
NCDHR
NCDNRCD
1-23-80
i2-8-81
8-03-B3
8-16-83
BOD5 MG/1-
}3i
>13O
170
7D MG/L
230
.CAL /iOOML
1000
<10
<iO
T.COLIFORM /iOOML
5000
T.REJ. MG/1
452
56O
TEN MG/L
47
47
PH
6-8.5
6.9*
6.1
6.8
6.7
ALKALINITY
178
439
COD MG/L
i40
D.O. MG/L
5.O
TEMP CENT.
29MAX
`
TOC MG/ -
TURBIDITY NTU
iiO
CHLORIDE MG/L
250
i18
188
'
ARSENIC UG/L 50
50
50
<111.)
COLOR
'
CYANIDE MG/1
0.2
0.005
<.02
FLUORIDE MG/L i.8
1.5
101
T.HARDNE%% MG/1
100
250
320
MBA% Mg/L
0^5
PHENOLS UG/L
i.O
13-')
SULFATE MG/L
150
250
SULFIDE MG/1
.002
<.02
SPECIFIC COND.UMHO%/CM
NO2+NO3-N MG/1
<.65
^07
PO4-P MG/1
<.05
'VER UG/L 50
51")
<5O
<5O
.RIDM UG/L iO0O
WOO
i 000
< i OOO
BERYLLIUM UG/L
.8ii
<50
CALCIUM MG/L
39
13O
CADMIUM UG/L iG
iO
4
<50
<50
<26.)
COBALT UG/L
i8O0
<00
<iOO
<1OO
CHROMIUM UG/L 50
50
50
<58
<50
<�O
COPPER UG/L
iOOO
<40
<40
<28
IRON UG/L
3800
i2oO
3,200
20,000
24,000
MERCURY UG/L 2
2
.05
<.05
SODIUM ME/L
i6O
51'')
MANGANESE UG/L
9,400
170,000
14,000
NICKEL UG/L
<108
<iOO
^
LEAD UG/L 50
50
30
<100
<iOO
<lOO
ZINC UG/L
5001".)
<50
<50
<20
SELENIUM MG/L .Oi
.Oi
.Oi
T.DI%.GA% %NAT
116
LAS MG/L
^2
DIN.%OLID% MC/L
500
50g
i020
ENDRIN UG/L .2
.03
LINDANE UG/L 4
.Oi
METHOXYCHLOR UG/L iOO
.03
TOXAPHENE UG/L 5
.O05
2,4-D MG/L .i
.1
2,4,5-TP MG/L .Oi
^'DRIN UG/L
.003
-ORDANE UG/L
DDT
DIELDRIN UG/L
.003
ENDOIULFAN UG/L
^003
i
.d

'
^
-
/ PARAMETER %DWA
B8D5 MC/L
r ` M�/L
| .AL /100ML
T'FECAL/1OOML
PH
ALKALINITY
CUD M(7?/L
D.O. MCy, /L
TEMP CENT.
TUC M�/L
TURBIDITY N-FU
CHLORIDE MG*/L
A ENIC UCY/L 58
CULOR
C7ANIDE MGf/L
FLUORIDE M�/L i.8
T.HARDNE%% MG/L
M8A% MG/L
PHENOL% UL
%ULFATE M�/L
%ULFIDE M�/L
%PECIFIC COND.UMHO%/CM
N82+NO3-N M�/L
P�4-P MG/L
dw%TA
NCDHR NCDNRCD
'
iOOO
5OOO
TRAN%YLVANI TY LANDFI[L
1-23-8O 12-8-81
>3i
<1O
452
47
6-8.5 6.9 6.1
i70 439
140
5.0
29MAX
250
5O
5O
0.2
O.005
i.5
1.8
iOO
O.5
1.O
1.O
25O
25O
.8O2
VER U�/L
5O 50
UM UG/L iOOO 1800
BERYLLIUM U�/L
CALCIUM M�/L'
CADMIUM U�/L
iO 1O
COBALT U�/L
CHROMIUM UCy/L
5O 5O
COPPER UG/L
i080
IRON U�/L
3O8O
MERCURY U�/L
2 2
%ODIUM M�/L
MAN�ANE�E U�/L
NICKEL UG/L
LEAD UG/L
5O 58
ZINC U�/L
5OOO
%ELENIUM MCy, /L
.01 .O1
T.DI%.G,A% AT
LA% M�/L
DI%.%OLID%
500
ENDRIN U�/L
.2
LA, NDO, NE UG/L
4
METHOXYCHLOR UG/L
iOO
TOXAPHENE UC,/L
5
2,4-1) MC,/L
.1
2,4,5.... TP M("I/L
.O1
UKY/L
JRDANE UG/L
DDT UG�/L
DIELDRIN U�/L
ENDO%ULFAN U�/L
G,ITT HION U�/L
3O
iiO
i1O i8O
<iO
(.O2
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... ----.... .... .... .... .... .... .... --- ------- -------
258 320
<50
'
<iO0O
39
<50
<5O
<iOO
<1OO
<5O
<5O
<4O
<4O
3,200
20),O6-)0
<.O5
160
9,400
178,000 _.... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... ... .... ....
<iOO
<1OO
<iOO
<5O
(5O
iO20

PARAMETER %DWA
BOD5 MG/L
MG/L
. AL /100ML
T.COLIFORM /iOOM|
T.RE%. MG/L
T%% MG/l
ALKALINITY
COD MG/L
D.O. MG/L
TEMP CENT,
TOG MG/L
TURBIDITY NTU
CHLORIDE MG/L
ARSENIC UG/L 50
COLOR
CYANIDE MG/L
FLUORIDE MG/L 1.8
T.HARDNE%% MG/L
MBA% MG/L
PHENOLS UG/L
SULFATE MG/L
%ULFIDE MG/L
SPECIFIC COND.UMHO%/CM
NO2+NO3-N MG/L
P»4-P MG/L
|
--RD%
%TA
TRAN%YLVANIALNTY
LANDFILL
NCDHR NCDNRC0
1-23-80
12-8-81
8-03-83
846-83
Q1
>130
170
23k)
i0O0
5000
452
56O
47
47
6-8.5
6.9
6.1
6.8
6.7
i70
439
140
5.O
29MAX
250
50
0,2
1.5
1.O
250
VER UG/L
50 50
b..kIUM UG/L iOOO
1000
BERYLLIUM UG/L
CALCIUM MG/L
CADMIUM UG/L
iO iO
COBALT UG/L
CHROMIUM UG/L
50 50
COPPER UG/L
180O
IRON UG/L
3800
MERCURY UG/L
2 2
SODIUM MG/L
MANGANESE UG/L
NICKEL UG/L
LEAD UG/L
50 50
ZINC UG/L
500()
SELENIUM MG/L .Oi
.01
T.DI%.9A% %SAT
LA% MG/L
DI%.%OLID% MG/L
500
ENDRIN UG/L
.2
LINDANE UG/L
4
METHOXYCHLOR UG/L
iOO
TOXAPHENE Ub/L
5
20-D MG/L
.1
2,4,5-TP MG/L
.Oi
RIN UG/L
JRDANE UG/L
DDT UG/L
DIELDRIN UG/L
ENDO%ULFAN UC/L
ON
O.005
1.8
100
005
i.0
25,f)
.002
1iO
iiO 100
(iill)
<.O2
250 32O
<.82
�.O5
.O7
<.05
<5O
<5O
<iOOO
<5O
39
130
<58
<50
<28
<100
<iOO
<iO8
<58
<58
<5O
<40
<48
<2O
3,200
20,000
24,000
<�O5
i6O
50
9,400
170,000
14,080
<iOO
<iO8
<iOO
<iOO
<108
<50
<50
<20

i
A
B
C
1
PT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & CO
COUNTYpE1r._.,PMENT
RIVER BASIN! f DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
REPORT 10'L ARO, FRO, MRO. RRO, WORO WiRO, WSRO.TS WATER QUALITY FIELD-LAS FORM (DM1)
Other
Shipped by. Bus, Co�urier, Other ` /f
LECT 5 i� •,- �(si1.! / f i1 nll.cA�A.A..[AM81ENt
1 G
BOD RANGE: SEED:
CHLORINAT
SAMPLE TYPE
❑EMERGENCY ❑SPLIT
LAITY LAB NUMBER 00008: t s/f %J}f1J j/ /
DATE RECIEVE/D _�/T _(S I, Time/ f
0 Recd_hy: A M11 From B! us-Gourier-Other
! . i
...,DATA ENTRY BY: /� CK: =•
❑COMPLIANCE DATE REPORTED-
Station Number
Date Beginl yy/mm/ ,
lime Begin
Dare End time End
Dept DM DB DBM
Volue Type Composite
Sample Type
3r~,
A H L T S B
C G GNXX
10 m /I
Chloride94
V
/IBOD
Ni -.Ni(kel i06; /n U u /
COD High 40 m /
Arsenic: Total `r U u /I
l
TKN as N 625 .i. (�1 m /I
P - ead 1051 �� % U t') u /
COWLow 335 -9/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 a /I
0/NO'
-NO3as N 630 f m /I
56- Antimony1097 u /I
Coliform:MF Fecoi3l 16 /100ml
Chi a:Corr 52209 u /I
Pf-PO4
f, !
as P 70507 ! Ll l m /I
'
e- Selenium 1147 u I
Coliforrn:MF Tolol 31504 /100mi
Ph a h rin a 32213 u /f
I/
P: Total as P 665 + 0:5 m /I
y
Zn- Zinc 109 2 up/1
Colilorm:Tube Fecaf31615 /100m1
Color:True 80 Pt -Co
P: Dissolved as P666 Mg/ I
,
if
� l
1.�/)
Coliform.Tube Total 1505 /100m11
��e)
Chromium: Hex.1032 'u 11
A - Silver 1077 u /I
Peshci e5 Specificolly
Residue Total 500 m /l
7t
Cyanide 720 �i >'� m ll
t%
AI - Aluminum 1105 C 1 Q'� u /.I
Volati9e 505 m /I
Fluo ide9 1 mg/I
Be- Ber thum1012 /l
S(an Or anochlorine
Fixed 10 m /i
Formaldehyde 71880 m /1
Ca - Calcium 916 nt /l
Scan Or anophos horus
✓
r.
Residuc:5�•^ended 530 rn /1
JW
Grease and Oils 556 e)k- T m /I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 v�l..% u /
Volatile 535 m / i
HardncsS:Tnta1900 m /I
✓
Co- Cobalt 1037 '� / /� t u /1
� /
I
, ificall !
Or antes S eG
Fixed 40 m /I
r
MBAS 38760 m /I
!/
I
ChroR',�r:*^!al 1034 u /I
`
�r p y
I-) Q! 4-x //(I �i � �' A?t 1'
H403 units
Phenols 32730 u 211
Y
Cu-Copper 1042 ti u /I
VScon Swe / Neutral Extractables
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m /I
11
Sulfate 945 `� �7 m 211
V
Fe- Iron 1045 /JJ u /I
Scan Acid Extractables
Acidity to PH 0 3 435 m /I
!
4fid. 745 �/J + 1 m /l
H-Mercur 0 u /l
2
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 4i5 m /I
Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm
Li - Lithium 1132 u /t
S ecial Analysis $ ecificall
At a inoy to PH 4 5 410 m /I
2
Biomass: Dry Wt. 573 g/M
__LMq-Mocinesium
�
927 7e moll
TOC 0 rn /I
2
Biomass: Peri Ash Free 572 9/M
i/
/
Mn-Manganese 1055 ! f )tau /I
Scan Acid Herbicides
J�
Turbidity 76 NIUJ
Chi a: Per, Fluro 82547 mg/M
No- Sodium 992f=9 m /l
Scan Pur eables
Sarmpling Point
Water Temperature('C)
D.O. , !
PH
Condutlance'
Alkalinity
Acidity
PT
pfJ
(++
61
of 25°C
PH 8.3 PH 4.5
PH 4.5 PH 8.3
63 2
t0
300
400
94
82244 431
82243 82242
Secchi (Meters)
Air leatpernture{°C)
D.O. ro Saturation
Salinity
Algae. Floating Mats
Precipitotion(In/Day)
Cloud Cover:%
Wind Direction(Deg.)
Wind Force
Severity
Beaufort
78
20
301
480
1325
45
32
36
37
1 Hr. Settleolale
d FishTurbidity
Severity
Odor;Armosp ere
Stream Flow
Detergent Suds
Oi -Grease
Floating Debris
Sludge Severity
Mntter(ml/r/Hr)
erity
E'1_0
Severity
1133G
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
50086
1350
1351
11305 11300
11345
11311
DMl/Revised

!,'/ ',i.
Water QualitY Divis,,i,
DEC 3 1984
we5ie};] fZC fri! �� Office
Ashevi!!e. �fOrtn �'rofina

u orted b aC�
by
;;t;3,o,rvisnr
ORGANIC ANALYSES
Entered by
Checked by
w mow. �� �. � � •
1 �
WUN
�. �� �. .RAMMIKIrlit
— \/ GC/MS/DS Used

RECEIVED
Water Quality Division
DEC 3 1984
4estern Regional Officq
Asheville, North Carolirw

4
C
E
E
S
1'.
2C
A
0
C
i''f2.rr
N.C. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY
NUMBER 00008,
COUNTY: f2a-If.&it.> .
DEVELOPMENT
LAB
j
iTIVER BASIN—�TtJI�J
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
DATE RECIEVED:
A- �\\�c�� Tire
REPORT TOrARO} FRO, MRO. RRO, WoRO WiRO, WSRO,TS
�./
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB
FORM (OM11
0
Rec'd by: Pet,_
From: Bus-Courier-Other
-
Other
.._
Shipped by Bus, Courier, Other [/ fi ��/R
t
SAMPLE [YPE
[]AMBIENT
❑SPLIT ❑/}COMPLIANCE
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK� l
COLLEC-TOR(S), U.(I !i___ .1! a iTn,J1U/ic
EMERGENCY
DATE REPORTED:
BOD RANGE; SEED
STATION LOCATION:
Anll A-
CHLORINATED : REMARKS:
Station Num er
A � a_
Dale Begin lyy/mm/
�;?44 hR ran
Time Begin
Date En
Time End
Depth(p jDB DAM
��
!
InType
H l
Composite Sample Type
T S B C G GNXX
BOD t0 s-k mg/1
Chloride940 m /I
NH as N 610 m /I
Ni - Nickel 1067 u /
(K,
1-1
COD Hi h 340 �- \ � m /
Arsenic: Tote 10 u /l
TKN as N 675 m /
Pb- Lead 1051 u /
COD:Low 335 mq/I
Chi a: Tri332217 u /I
NO—NONOZ-NO3 as N 630 m /I
Sb- Antimony 1097 u /I
�q
r
/ry
Coliform:MF Feca131 16 L >'l J /100m1
Chi o:Corr 32209 u /I
PO4 as P 70507 m /I
Se S leni m u I
Colifor :MF Total 04 /100m1
Pheo h fin o 32213 u /I
P: Total as P 665 n /I
Zn- Zinc 1092 u /l
Coliform:Tube Feco131615 /100m1
Color:True 80 Pt -Co
P: Dissolved as P666 m /1
C Iiform:Tube Total 31505 /100mll
Chromium:Her.1032 u /I
A -Silver 1077 u /I
Pestici s $ Cificall
y
Residue Total SQ9 n m /I
Cyanide 720 m /I
Al - Aluminum 1105 v /I
Volatile 505 m /I
Fluoride9 1 mg/I
Be- Beryllium 1012 /I
Scan Or anochlorine
Fired 510 m /I
Formaldehyde 71880 m /I
Ica - Calcium 916 m /I
Scan Or ono hos horns
Residue:S ended 530 m /I
1
`i
Grease and Oils 556 \ m /I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 u /
Volorile 535 m /I
Hardness:Tolof 900 m /f
Co- Cobalt 1037 Qg/I
Or aniCs $ Cificall
'red 540 m /I
MBAS 38260 m /I
Chromium: tal 1034 a /t
XH
+
403 n l L units
Phenols 32730 a /I
—Cu-<opper
1042 u /I
$tan Base / Neutral Extroctables
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m /f
Sulfate 945 n /1
Fe- Iron 1045 u /!
Scan Acid Extractobles
Acidity to PH 6 3 435 m /I
Sulfide 745 m /I
H-Mercur 00 u /I
Alkalinity to pFj 8.3 415 m /I
2
Specific Cord.95 uMhos/cm
Li - Lithium1132 u /1
$ eciol Analysis Specifically
Alkalinit to RH 4 5 410 to /I
2
Biomass: Dry Wt. 573 9/M
M -Magnesium 927 m /f
TOC4580 m /I
2
Biomass Peri Ash Free 572 13/M
Mn -Manganese 1055 u /I
Scan Acid Herbicides
IT.tbidity
-
745 NTU
2
lChl a: Peri Hato 82547 mg/M
No - Sodium 929 m /I
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
T
67
Water Temperoture("C)
10 , it
130.
��/f
300 /i r
pH
/} //�
400 �/ V
Conductance
at25°C
94 �/ 140, 0
Alkalinity
pH8.3 PH4,5 --�
82244 431 /
Acidity
PH4.5 PH8.3
82243 8224211" I
Secchi(Meters)
78
Air Temperature (C)
20
D,O.%Saturation
301
Salinity %e
480
Algae, Floating Mats
Severity
1325
Precip+tation(In/Day)
45
Cloud Cover:%
32
Wind Direction(Deg.)
36
Wind Force
Beaufort
37
1 Hr. settlealtile
Matter(mWIFIr,)
50086
Dead Fish
Severity
11340
Turbidiry Severity
11350
Odor,Atmosp ere
Severity
1330
Stream Flow
Severity
InCii
Detergent Suds
Severity
1305 0300
Oil -Grease
Severity
Floating Debris
Severity
11345
Sludge Severity
131c
DM1/Revised

t

x.��= r� -• N:C PT- OF NATURA' 'OURCES C ( I
.� .. fir" 'a -r� , rzr�. a, s & 0 1N TY r
'41 A';0 �,. `may y��, �,.-. � f i DEVE. � - "� •_: R 0,,,
_ � � MENT � lAB NUMBER 00
JWER
�•`- '✓ f } -q %flip! - #. . a. - e•+- �' !�: •/,.� -�,'
DIVJSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GATE RELIEVED:,
REPORt-TOc (Cir[I. O ) ' ' -. { fi T WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMT) � � r Vr � � ► C L -'
�iClE_ E_2 BY;
.�-� ``,', I • ° • t 4; r . 'SAMPLE TYPE
A87D,FRO, MRO RRO fWoRO W1R0 WSRO BM, TS T , * DA]AENTRY BY:.•
RE ice-- CK'
�"�' AMBIENT f ' CO - COMPLIANCE z REPORTED;
tiY
DATE e n; 1'�, f f r• D�
COLLECTOR(sL ❑ ❑ 4S-
c k�r1NTENSIVES. SPllf* EMERGENCY /• ' f+,r/
BOD RANGE: A..r �/iL'trft!�i� r1.fi %A' T l i�' t% !« ?hC.s �,lf c.+!�Cf f.'"�•��i. "�
' s,T 1 r'�• . -� '.i •r•r}obi '�y�- t , .. " •y.. _ Y/ -• y :�- - - �
CHLORINATED' - _ REMARKS,
L
4
B
r-,
falian Number_
pate Begin I yy/mm/ I
ime Begin r
Date En
Time En
OePt DM DS DBM _
Va ue Type
Samplr Type .. -
Composite
A H I y
C G GNXX
T S B
BODs 3TO. 'r 's' /I
,t
[hlaride mail
1 H as �N 610 r mail
+
Mo- denum 062,
N - Sodivm 929 m . l
OD -Hi 40
Ar enir.lno aalr u1 /
N a0 25 r'
' vp t.
OD=low 335 r m /
Chi a: Tri 32210 uivl
+NO of N 630e.,/ D /1
-
Ni*- Nickel 1067 v /
aliform:MF Fe al 1 /1 m
Cha:Carr37211 /
r
P �j m/I
P- ead 1p5i /D ci
/
%C lift :MF Total �} r/1 mt
r
P o h Tin o 32218 v !Iolal
as P665 �r m /I
$b- Antimony 1097 /I
oli(orm:Tube Fecal 15 /1 ml
Color: True so Pt-C
P: Dissolved as P 66 m /1
Sn- Tin1102 ` /1
li(orm:Tube Total r. i--'neginl
Chromium: Hex.1032 /I
A - Silver 7077 /1
V - Vanadium 1087
-
Residw:Tof I t}` •t. +• r�.
Cyanide 7 m II
-
AI -` Aluminum1105 �# ll
Zn- m • 1092 L U u /I
a}i11505 �' 1` m /1
F ride !1
Bo= 'u 1007 '/1
Pesticides (S •cif
.? 4
' •Fixed 10 #' + ° : m /I
F;rmold"vdjt 71880 mail
Be- 8or•hium 101 + - +' • *- • ;/I
"' •r •�'� "'
Residue: nded 530 mg /I
Grease and Oils 556 /l
ce- Calcium 416
Volatile 535
prdnessJotal 9 /I
d- co dmium 1027 J� � /
fixed 540 t' •
IMBAS 38260 m /i
o- Cobalt 1037 ��� u /
snits (S etiO
y 1
~
H4 S_ x;,• units
_
Phenols 32i3O mail
V
hromium: tal 1034
ridit to H 4.5 436 + m /l
Sulfate 945 mail
-Co er 2 �'i fJ /)
4
O
/J
l% rls3 �L+ i iY
f '
Acidity ro H 8.7 4 t y;s' �,' 7 ,c r"qA
S+il(ide 745 �/). mail
ti
FeL Iron 1045 -�i �� /
Atka to 8.3 4i5 t F•' m /1
-
5 eciHc Cand.95 uMhos/cm
4
H-Mercur 0 'f 5 /I
• �'• -r/ r "t �!i /i �7
Alkalinity t H4-5 410 T, `•> m I
Biomass:Or Wt. 573 g/ 2
Li - ithium 1132 `~ /
e i
r 2
8 . m /t
Biomass:Peri Ash Free572 g/M
M - a nesium 7 + m1/1
7j
+: NTU
2urbidit
Chl a : Peri S ctT032228 -9/
Mn-Mon anew 1D5.5 �7^F i�V
Sampling Point
Water Temperature('C)
D.O.
PH
Conductance
Alkalinity a -•, :
Acidity
PT x
at25'C
PH 8.3 PH 4.5
PH 4.5 DH 8.3
r
4-
2
1
300
00
94
82244 431
82243 82242
Soachi(Motors)
Air Temperature ('C►
D.O. X Saturation
SalinityX.
Algoe;FloatingMats
PreciP:tation(In/Day)
Cloud over;%
Win Direction(Deg.)
Wind Force
SfreritY
'
Jl`
20 .
301 t (
480
1325
45 3-2
t
36
37 +r
1 Hr.ttlea a
Deod Fis - »
'
Twisidity Swerity
or;Atmosp ere
Stream Flow
Detergent $u s -
Oi-Greose •_.
Flooring De ris
Sludge Severity
Mateer mill/mr
(
•ma's
Swerity i_- - -�
,
•
Severity
Severity
$evenly _ Severity
vi o
Sererily.
50086
)S: V.F�
1340 `e ; . •
r -
1350 '
.• 4.
1336 f
,
1351
.
1305 1300'
�..-:� �. 1,-�
• . L psi.
1345 '
1315
I
DM1/Revised I/81LA: t `:RO,C

Reporte i by�^
Checks,; hy:�
Supervisar�
Lab No. a �,
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Entered by.�
Checked by�
40-1- Analvtical ]
pup
Date�f
t �
t
• 1,
is
.,_,_� GC/MS/DS used

.i
� ���
� l �
_r ... . ,

Pen- ,e
,Abl Nor- h Carolina Department of Natural
jq§F ResoUrces &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsiey, Secretary
Division of Environmental Management
U
November 10,
1981
ON
RECEIVED
Water Quality Division
MEMORANDUM
AUG 11 1983
TO:
0. W. Strickland, Head
Western Regional Office
Solid & Hazardous waste Mgt.
Asheville, North Carolina
Division of Health Services
THRU :
Forrest Wes ---all, Head
Monitoring & Technical vices
Branch
FROM:
Biological Monitoring Group
Monitoring & Technical Services
Branch
SUBJECT:
Transvlvania & Buncombe County
Landfills
As part of our cooperative agreement, here for your review are
the draft results of a survey we conducted at the Transylvania
and Buncombe County landfills. Our investigation suggested that
there are some water quality problems at the Transylvania site.
However we could not detect.any acute toxicity at either site
during both an extended dry period or during a spate event. It is
doubtfull that bioassay samples truly represented a leachate of
the landfills since grou'ndwater wells were not present. All
landfill surveys will be reported upon in a similar fashion. If
you have any comments please do not hesitate to give us a call,
P. Q. Box 27687 Raleigh, N. C. 276 i 1-7687
An EauolOvoortunity Affirmative.fiction Emotoyer

0
Results and Discussions
Benthos: (Transylvania County Landfill)
Single -number summaries (Table 1) show a large drop in both taxa
richness and density below the landfill. Taxa richness dropped from
48 at the control site to 23 at station 2. Such a large decline is
indicative of severe stress (Penrose et al., 1980). The biotic index
also indicates severe stress at station 2. The increase in the biotic
index demonstrates that the change in the benthic community is quElitative
as well as quantitative.
Taxa Richness, tabulated by the major groups, confirms the above
analysis. All groups show a decline at station 2, with the most sensitive
groups (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Coleoptera) disappearing completely
below the landfill.
Table 3 lists the ten most abundant taxa at each station, here
defined as the "dominant" organisms. Of the ten dominant taxa listed
for the control station, only 3 are stilldominant at the station below
the landfill. The dominant taxa at the latter station are typical of
low dissolved oxygen conditions, esp. Chirohomus and Limnodrilus.
The combination of low density and low species richness suggests that
some chronic toxicity may be present.
Field observation noted growths of Sphaerotilus natans (sewage
fungus) below the confluence with the runoff channel. This growth
will develop anywhere there is sufficient nutrient concentrations.
However, during'spate events Sphaerotilus growths may break loose
and drift downstream.
Bioassay:
It is questionable whether the samples collected in the drainage
ditch below the landfill, represents a leachate from the landfill sites.
Normally, upgradient and downgradient well samples are taken for a
relative comparison of toxicity above and below a landfill. Further
complicating the analysis were the conditions during sample periods.
Extremely dry conditions (first sample) may have lowered ground water
levels, minimizing leaching of the landfill. Heavy rain (second
sample) probably made the November test predominantly surface runoff
waters.
The results of both bioassays demonstrated minimal acute toxicity.
Acute toxicity was measured as mortalityin a population of Daphnia
up lex exposed to six concentrations of sample and a control. There
was no toxicity in either bioassay at a 100% concentration of sample.

Introduction
At the request of the Land of Sky Regional Council of Governments
and with the cooperation of both the Environmental Health Section of
the Division of Health Services (DHS) and the District Sanitarian,
the Biological Monitoring Group of Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) conducted a survey of two landfills. These two county landfills
were at the Buncombe and Transylvania sites (see attached county maps).
The objectives of'these surveys were to assist DHS in their assessment
of possible water qulaity impacts attributed to landfill management.
The Transylvania County landfill is located near Rosman, NC
within the Calloway Creek watershed. At the present time this site does
not have any monitoring wells down gradient from the fill site.
However there is a channel downgradient of the site which does contain
runoff from the landfill. This channel then flows to Calloway Creek.
Our monitoring activities at this site consisted of collecting benthic
macroinvertebrate samples from two stations, one above and one below
the confluence of this runoff channel with Calloway Creek. This group
of organisms may serve as indicators of any chronic toxicity. Collection
and analysis procedures adhere to methods described in Penrose, et al.
1980. Also, water samples were collected from the runoff channel to be
used for a series of bioassays. Water smaples were collected on two
occasions, one during an extended dry period (October 13) and another
during a spate event (October 19). These tests were run to determine
acute toxicity.
The Buncombe County landfill is located adjacent to NC 191 near
Weaverville, North Carol.iha. This site also does not currently have
any monitoring wells installed. However, like the Transylvania site,
there is a runoff channel flowing from the downgradient side of the
site. This runoff channel flows directly to the French Broad River.
Our monitoring activities at this site consisted of collecting water
samples from the runoff channel to be usedfor bioassay. Two water
samples were collected from this site to determine acute toxicity.
Collection dates were similar with the Transylvania site. No benthic
macroinvertebrate sample were collected at this site.

Table 1. Level I Analaysis, Transylvania County Landfill,
Calloway Creek - October 1981 -
Total Taxa Richness
% reduction
Avg. Density/Sample
% reduction
Biotic Index
Station 1 (control) Station 2 (below landfill)
1
374
2 .4 (fair)
*Indicates Severe Stress
**Indicates Moderate Stress
23
52%
216
42%
3.7 (poor)
Table 2. Taxa Richness, by group, Calloway Creek
October 1981
Group Station:
1
2
Ephemeroptera
6
-
Plecoptera
2
-
Trichoptera
7
3
Coleoptera
2
-
Odonata
2
1
Diptera: Misc.
6
5
Diptera: Chironomidae
14
11
Oligochaeta
4
2
Crustcea
1
-
Mollusca
3
1
Other
1
-

Table 3. Ten Most Abundant Taxa at Each Station,
Calloway Creek - October 1981
Station 1 - Station 2
Lumbriculidae 131
Cheumatapsyche sp. 118
Parachaetacladius sp. 75
Stenonema modestum 74
Hydatophylax argus 37
Tipula sp. 30
Pristina sp 30
Limnodrilus sp. 28
Hexatoma sp. 26
Conchapelopia gr. 19
Chironomus sp. 128
Limnodrilus sp. 81
Concha2elol2ia gr 58
Polypedilum convictum 37
Brillia sp. 24
Prodiamesa olivacea 17
Poly2edilum illinoense 18
Cheumatopsyche sp. 10
Tanytarsus sp 8
Polypedilum fallax 6

LEGEND _,.:' i _�� y�r W��a.:W
F] PROPOSED LANDFILLS
EXISTING LANDFILLS p t SGW
OPEN DUMPS
?4 A T 09 t4
'.r' _
F 0 0 E
=?''� ,^4 __i ,.(: � � J d '�� I '.r,_�.,Yi :,�t�' :0.�Y,� J i "�f n'�` . •r rl.in
, --7-Y
h,
I A
rakj�
r j
i
kr
lit
'N'�stl IMORE
WAIE
pisr—;
L
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

r.
wwxo—I
yCdMfT
1
LEGEND
r\��
[] PROPOSED LANDFILLS
a ' s.. i ..• gar �
Q EXISTING LANDFILLS 3� ` a
OPEN DUMPS
14.
IL
y: s
r.—�lra'�`.';''r � ° �'��v `, oTr i.•' ''ice '�.. — �� � % .. {
* /�� }) :. nir+oNr, "'�r �.'.�j7__ y, �T?`, �::- r aue..!.n j• ,
TRANSAVANIA COUNTY
. �.... .. s NORTH CAROLINA

N.C. DEPT, OF NATURAL _SOURCES & COMMUNITY
1
2
a
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
i2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A
B
C
COUNTY: � iewCS�/'+[i0"'��`�/ of DEVELOPMENT LAB NUMBER 00008: \ \—'\ �
RIVER BASIN: w DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DATE RECIEVED
REPORT TO ARO, FRO, MRO; RRO, WaRO WiRO, WSROJS WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1) Recd by: 6-�r I From: Bus -Courier -Other
Shipped 6y= B'Couri�er+^O�ther `�1 Q SAMPLE TYPE DATA ENTRY BY: 1, -._ii jCK:
COLLECTOR(S): /Cs/.Grp AMBIENT EMERGENCY ❑SPLIT ❑COMPLIANCE DATE REPORIEU' ?S 3
BOD RANGE SEED: CHLORINATED: STATION LOCATION: it/S C/Li✓/�^�//9 [.�EJ!/n/� 'l'�
Station Num er
pore Begin yy/mm/ 1
lime Begin Dale End
Time End Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite Sample Type
J/
A H L
T S B C G GNXX
t /
BOD 310 1 Al m /I
Chloride940 m /I
NH as N 61D m /I
No - Sodium 929
COD High 340 a --+f; mg/1
Arsenic Total 100 u /l
TKN as N 625 Mg/l
Ni - Nickel 1067 1
COD:Low 335 mo/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 u /l
NO tN0 as N 63G m /I
Pb- lead 1051 u /
Co)iform:MF Feca131616 410 /100m1
Chi o:Corr 32209 u ri
POd as P 70507 nt /l
S6- Antimony 1097 u /I
v
Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100m1
Pheo h tin a 32213 u /I
P: Totai as P 665 Ma/ I
5e- Selenium 1147 u /1
Colilorm:Tulne Feca131615 /100ml
Color True 80 PI -Co
A: Dissolved as P 666 rn /I
Zn- Zinc 109 a/1
Coliiorm:Tube Total 31505 /100ml
Chromium: Hex.1032 u /I
A - Silver 1077 u /I
Pesticides Specifically
tt
Residue- Total 0 m /I
ICyanide 720 m /I
Al - Aluminum 1705 u /I
Volatile 505 o m /I
Fluoride 91 m /I
Be - Beryllium 1012 will
Scan Or anochlorine
Ael
Fixed 5)0 m /I
Formaldehyde 71880 m /I
Ca- Calcium 916 rn /I
'Scan Or anophos horus
Residues ended 530 m /I
Grease and Oils 556 m /I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 u 1
Volatile 535 m /I
Hardness:Totai 900 m /I
Co- Cobolt 1037 u /I
Or anics Specifically
V
F'ced 540 3 m /1
MBAS 38260 m /I
Chromium: oral 1034 u /I
�i
H 403 a 41 unils
Phenols 32730 u /1
Cu-Co er 1042 u /I
Scan Base / Neutral Extractables
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m /I
Sulfale 945 mg/I,
Fe- Iron 1045 u /I
Scan Acid Extractables
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 m /t
Sulfide 745 m /I
H-Mercur 900 u /I
2
to pFI 8.3 415 m /I
Specific Cand- 95 uMhos/cm
Li - Lithium 1132 u /I
Special Analysis Specifically
.Alkalinity
2
to PH 4-5 410 m /I
Biomass: Dry WI, 573 9/M
M -Magnesium 927 mg/I
-Alkalinity
2
TOC 68Q nt /I
Biomass: Peri Ash Free 572 9/M
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Scan Acid Herbicides
2
[Turbidity 76 NIUI
I
lChl a: Peri Flura 82547 mg/M
MO -Molybdenum 1067 u /I
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
Water Tempernture('C)
D.O.
pH
Conductance
Alkalinity
Acidity
PT %
at 25°C
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
PH 4.5 pH 8.3
6j 2
10
300
400
94
82244 431
82243 02242
Secchi(Meters)
Air Temperolure('C)
D_O.%Saturation
Salinity %
Algae:Floating Mats
Precipltotion(In/Day)
Cloud Cover:%
Wind Direction(peg.)
Wind Force
'
Severity
Beaufort
78
20
301
480
1325
45
32
36
37
1 Hr. Settleable
Dead Hs
Turbidity Severity
Odor;Almosp ere
Stream Flow
Detergent Su s
Oi -Grease
Floating Debris
Sludge Severity
Matter(ml/I1Hr.1
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
50086
1340
1350
1330
1351
1305 L
1300
11345
11315
DM1/Revised 10/82

4
S
'
■
4 '
N
i

1
a
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
10
18
19
20
A
B
C
----- N.t. ,EPT, Of NATURAL'RESOURCES & CL. .UNITY
COUNTY: /e4A/SYLC44N//-1' DEVELOPMENT LAB NUMBER 000088:--*- .�
RIVER BASIN: 1-'Z 'vc'sr � DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DATE REVEVED; () rQ S�
REPORT TO: ARO FRO, MRO, RRO, WoRO WiRO, WSRO,TS WATER DUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1) Rerd bv:%�! From: Bus-C`' rt3r�—Other_
Shipped by: Bus, Courier, Ofh�er e_Z / 1z
SAMPLE FYPE DATA ENTRY BY: Z ;" L CK r7
COLLECTOR(5)= . 2) 'AMBIENT ❑EMERGENCY ❑SPLIT ❑COMPLIANCE DATE REPORTED/ x
BOD RANGE: SEED' CHLORINATED: STATION LOCATION .^a
Station Num er
Date Begin yy/mm/
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM D8 DBM
Value Type
A H L
Composite
T S B
Sample Type
CO GNXX
!/
f__45ZD
SOD ILO_ mg/1
Chloride940 m /1
1/
NH j as N 610 m /1
W
No- Sodium 929 V m /I
COO High 40 m /I
Arse. ic:Tolo 1 100u !I
TKN as N 625 / m /1
f e
Ni - Nickel 1067 �f[!e.% u /)
COD -Low 335 m /
Chi a: Tri 322)7 u /I
1.ol
NO NO3•as N 63ri / U / m /1
P6 Lead 1051 ✓�L� u /
Coliform:MF Feca131616 /IOOml
Chi o:Corr 32209 u /I
PO4 as P 70507 I�� ra /l
✓
Sb- Antimony109711t u /i
ColiformcMF Total 31504 /100ml
Pheo h tin a 32213 u /1
✓
P: Totai as P 665 Q / '/1
re —Selenium 1147
Coliform:Tube Fecal31615 /100ml
Color: True 80 -Pt-Co
P:Dissolved as P666 m /I
Zn-zinc 109 +` � u /1
Coliform:Tvbe Total I OS 1100ml
Chromium:Hex.1032 v /1
,r
A -Silver 1077 '�.� a /I
Pesticides Specifically
�
r :
Residue Total 0 m /I
Cyanide 720 m /I
Al - Aluminum1105 ./.� u 11
Volatile 505 m /I
Fluo ide951 -mg/I
Be- Beryllium 1012 t � u /1
Scan Or anochlorine
Fixed 510 m /I
j
Formaldehyde 71880 m /1
Co- Calcium 916 fw3+j'm /1
Scan Or anophos horus
Residve:5 ended 30 m /I
Grease and Oils 556 m /I
1 n
Cd- Cadmium 1027 rr' u /
Volatile 535 mg/1
Hardness:Total bU0 m /I
Co- Coboll 1037 f� u /I
Organics Specifically
Fixed 540 m /I
WAS 38260 m /f
/
Chromium:Total 1034 on/1
H 403 units
Phenols 32730 u /1
e/
Cu-Co er 1042 �130 u /1
Scan Base / Neutral Extractabies
Acidity to PH 4-5 436 mg/1
Sulfate 945 m /f
Fe- Iron 1045 ate: Da J u /I
Scan Acid Extractables
Acidity to PH 8-3 435 m /1
Sulfide 745 m /i
H-Mercur 00 u /I
2
1--
�
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 mg/1
Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm
'Li - Lithium 1132 u 11
Special Analysis Specifically
2
J Q
Alkalinity to PH4.5 410 m /I
BiOMOSST Dry Wt. 573 9/M
M rMa nesium 927 • V m9/I
2
TOC 8 nt /I
Biomass: Pert Ash Free 572 9/M
�j
Mn =Manganese 1055 14- 000 -911
Scan Acid Herbicides
Turbidit 7 NIT
2
Chi a: Pert Fluro 82547 mg/M
Mo-Mot bdenum 1062 "�' /0 0 u /1
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
Water Temperature('C)
PH
Conductance
Alkalinity
Acidify
PT
ED
at25`C
PH 0.3 pH 4.5 pH4,5
182244
PH 8.3
6 2
10
400
94
431 82243
82242
5ecchi (Meters)
Air Temperolure(°C)
D.O.%Saturation
Salinity%,
Algae; Floating Mots
Precipitotion(ln/Doy)
Cloud Cover;% Wind
Direction(Deg-)
Win Farce
Severity
Beaufort
78
20
301
480
1325
45
32 36
37
1 Hr-Settlea a
Dead Fish
Turbidity Severity
Odor; Almosp ere
Stream Flow
Detergent Suds
Oil -Grease Floating
Debris
Sludge Severity
Matter(mllflHr)
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity Severity
50086
1340
1350
1330
1351
1305 11300
1134S
OM1/Revises 82

19
E
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
la
11
12
i3
14
17
18
19
20
A
B
C
�^��
N.C. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY
i
COUNTY:
DEVELOPMENT
LAB NUMBER 00008:
RIVER BASIN' �
DIVISION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECIEVED7
REPORT TO: A/ R.. OFRO, MRO, RRO, WoRO WiRO, WSRO, TS
WATER QUALITY
0DATE
FIELD -LAB FORM { DM1 }
Recd by C.� w i�� from: Bus - Courier - Other_
Shipped 6y: Bus, Courier, Other QQ
�
AMBIENT
SAMPLE TYPE
❑EMERGENCY ❑SPLIT �C IANCE
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATES��a a. TT
CQLLECTQR�S): w.Y
i
BOD RANGE/'<,0J-SEED: CHLORINATED:
STATION LOCATION'
REMARKS:
Station Num er
Oate Begins yy/mm/ 1
Time Begin
Date En Time En Dept DM OB DBM
Value Type
A H L
Composite
T S B
samplfNIX
C G
e��
4.wi-
BOD5 3io , �, m /I
Chloride940 m /f
NH i as N 610 m /I
Na —Sodium 929 m !I
COD High 340 m /
Arsenic: Totoi 1002 u /l
TKN as N 625 m /I
Ni — Nickel 1067 u /I
COD:Low 335 -9/1
Chi a Tri 32217 u /I
NO + NO3 as N 630 __Tcj/l
Pb— Lead 1051 v /
Coliform.MF Fecal 3l 16 /IOOml
Chi a:Corr 32209 a /1
PO4 as P 70507 rn /I
S6— Antimony 1097 u /I
Colilorm:MF Total 31504 /100mI
Pheo h fin a 32213 u /I
P: Total as P 665 mg/ I
Se— SeleniLLm H47 u /I
Coliform:Tube Fecol31615 /100-1
Color: True 80 Pt —Co
P: Dissolved as P 666 m /I
Zn— Zinc 109 u /1
Coliform:Tu6e Total 31505 /loom]
Chromium:Hev_1032 u /i
A —Silver 1077 u /]
pesticides $ ecificall
Residue Total 500 m /I
Cyanide 720 m /I
Al — Aluminum 1105 u /I
Volatile 505 m /l
FI oride9 1 mg/I
Be — Beryllium 1012 u /1
Scan Organ6chlorine
Fixed 510 a /I
Formaldeh de 71880 mg/1
Co — Calcium 916 m /1
Scan Or anophos horvs
Residue:$ ended 530 in /I
Grease and Oils 556 m /I
Cd— Cadmium 1027 u /
Volatile 535 rn /I
lHordnessJotal9 0 mq/I
Co— Cobalt 1037 u /I
lOrqanics S ecificall
Fixed 540 m /I
MBAS 38260 m /l
Chromium: otal 1034 u^ll
H 403 units
Phenals 32730 u /I
Cu—Co er 1042 .911
Scan Base / Neutral Exiraciabies
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 n /1
Sulfate 945 m !l
Fe— Iron 1045 a /I
Scan Acid Extractables
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 n /f
Sulfide 745 m /1
H—Mercur 900 u /I
Alkulinit to VH 8.3 415 m /I
2
Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm
Li — Lithium 1132 u /I
$ e6al Anof sis $ ecificaU
Alkalinity to PH 4.5 41C m /I
2
Biomass: Dry Wit. 573 9/M
M — Magnesium 927 mq/I
TOC 8 - m /I
2
Biomass: Peri Ash Free 572 9/M
Mn—Manganese 1055 ug/I
Scan Acid Herbicides
-iTurbidiiv
7t, NTLIJ
2
Chl a: Peri Fluro 82547 mg/M
Mo—Mot bdenum 1062 a/1
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
P1 %
63 2
Water Temperoture('C)
TO
D.O.
300
pH
400
Conductance
at25'C
94
Alkalinity
PH 8.3 PH 4.5
82244 431
Acidity
pH 4.5 PH 8.3
82243 82242
Secchi(Meters)
78
Air temperature('[)
20
D.O.%Saturation
301
Salinity%,
480
Algae, Floating Mats
Severity
1325
Precipitation(in/Day)
45
Cloud Cover;%
32
Wind Direction(Deg.)
36
Win Force
Beaufort
37
1 Hr. Settlea a
Matter(mllllHr)
50096
Dead Fis
Severity
11340
Turbidity Severity
11350
Odor;ere
Severity
11330
stream Flow
Severity
11351 -
Detergent Suds
Severity
1305
Oil -Grease
Severity
1300
Floating Debris
Severity
1345
Sludge Sevarily
DMI/Revisec 11

4[
J
6
7
8
9
10
11
i2
i3
14
11
18
19
20
A
B
C
COUNTY:
RIVER BASIN=
REPORT 10 ARO, FRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO WiRO, WSRO, TS
Shipped by: Bus, Courier, Or er
COLLECTOR(S)= '�LJ
N.C. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY 3 f
DEVELOPMENT LAB NUMBER 00008
Ep: � � ,S � P 3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DATE RECIEVpp
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM 1DM11 Recd by (, ,,I"�" I From: Bus —Courier —Other
SAMPLE TYPE DATA ENTRY BY: CK: ryry
❑AMBIENT ❑EMERGENCY SPLIT .COMPLIANCE DATE REPORTED: _ ' ���_l -�, �. 1 i7_I
BOD RANGE: SEED: CHLORIN61ED: STATION LOCATION: IAI a _S (fr,-
- REMARKS: �"�G% rL.� g S
Station Number
Dote Begin yy/mm/ Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depr DM DB DBM
Va ue Type
A H. L
Composite Samp le�Type
T S B G \GNXI(
i.1/
BOD- 310 m /I
I
Chloride940 m /l
NH3_as N 610 m /I
I
No - Sodium 929 m /I
COD Hifjk40 mg/l
Arsenic:Toto 1 /1
TKN as N 625 m /1
Ni - N;ckel 1067 v /I
COD=Low 335 mg/l
Chi or Tri 3221Z u 1l
NO -NO3as N 630 m /I
Pb- Lend 1051 u /
Colilorm:MF Fecat3116 /100mf
Chlo:Corr 32209 u /I
PO4 as P70507 mg/1
Sb- Antimony 1097 s u /I
Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100ml
Pbeo h tin a 32213 u /l
P: Totai as P 665 mall
Se- Selenium 114 u /I
Coliform:Tu6e Feca131615 /100mE
Color:True BO Pt -Co
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I,
Zn- zinc 109 /l
CoWorm:Tube Total 31505 /100m1
Chromium:Hex_1032 ug/I
A -Silver 1077 u /I
Pesticides Specifically
Residue- Total 5QO m /)
Cyanide 720 m /I
At - Aluminum 1105 u /I
Volatile 505 m /l
Fluoride9 1 mg/l
Be- Ber Ilium 1012 u /I
Scan Or anochlorine
Fixed 510 m /I
Formaideh de 71880 m /I
Co - Calcium 916 m /I
X
Scan Or anophos horus
Residue:5 ended 530 ma/I
Grease and Oils 556 m /I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 u /
Volatile 535 m /l
Hardness:Tofol 900 mg/I.
Co- Cobalt 1037 _ u /I
Organics Specifically
Fixed 540 m /I
MBAS 38260 m /I
Chromium: otal 1034
H403 units
Phenals 32730 u /I
-Cu-Copper
1042 u /I
Scan Base / Neutral Extroctab'tes
Acidity to PH 4 5 436 m /I
Sulfate 945 m /I
Fe- iron 1045 u /I
Scon Acid Extractables
Acidity so PH 8.3 435 m /I
i
Sulfide 745 mg/1
H-Mercur 0 u /l
Alkalinit to Rtj 8.3 415 mg/1
2
5 ecific Cond.95 uMbas/cm
li - Lithium 1132 vitll
Special Analysis Specifically
Alkolinitv to PH 4.5 41C m /I
2
Biomass' Dr Wt. 573 9/M
M9 -Magnesium 927 mg/I
TOC OQ m /l
2
Biomass: Per Ash Free 572 9/M
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I/I
Scan Acid Herbicides
Turbidity7 NTU
2
Chl a: Peri Fluro 82347 mg/M
Ma-Mol bdenum 1062 /I
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
PT %
63 2
Water Temperature(°C)
M
D.O.
300
PH
400
Conductance
at25°C
94
Alkalinity
PH 8.3 PH 4.5
62244 431
Acidity
PH 4.5 PH 9.3
92243 82242
Secchi (Meters}
78
Air Temperature(`C)
20
D.O.% Saturation
301
Salinity%.
490
Algae; Floating Mats
Severity
1325
Precipitotion (in/Day)
45
Cloud Cover; $
32
Wind Direction(Deg.)
36
Wind Force
Beaufort
37
1 Hr. Settleo a
Matter(ml/ITHO
50086
Read Fish
Severity
1340
Turbidity Severity
1350
Odar,Atmosp ere
Severity
1330
Stream Flow
Severity
1135i
Detergent Suds
Severity
1305 11300
Oil -Grease
Severity
Floating Debris
Severity
11345
Sludge Severity
DMI/Revvisec )<

d
A -
N.C. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY
I �
D
COUNTY: /i^��
DEVELOPMENT
LAB NUMBER
00008=
RIVER BASIN:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DATE RECIEVED:
'S ' �6'R �
6W�
_- -._--
REPORT TC►-�FRO, MRO. RRO, WoRO WiRO, WSRO,T$
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM {DM111
Recd
b :
From: Bus - Courier -Other_
��
Shipped by: Bus, Courier, Other
SAMPLE TYPE
DATA
ENTRY BY:
CK:�
1 Q
C_QLLECTOR(S): �
❑AMBIENT EMERGENCY SPLIT
C�OM LIANCE
AT
DATE
jED.-'
f {' -
BOD RANGE%S a $EED� CHLORINATED:
STATION LOCATION: iQ❑--RrEP
�-.R
`Y/�'wr•'��.'�
REMARKS: / �+C
/��/'G 7"/>
�7���
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A
B
C
Station Num er
Dale Begins yy/rnm/ ) Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB 08M
Value Type
A H L
Composite SampleType
T 5 B C (5G N X X
10 m /I
Chloride940 m /l
INH11 as N 610 m /l
No- Sodivm 929 m /I
COD High 340 mg/Img/I
Arsenic: Total 1002 u /1
TKN as N 625 m /I
Ni- Nickel 1067 u /I
COD:Low 335 mg/Img/I
Chi a: TH 32217 u /l
NO -NO as N 630 m /I
p - Lead 1051 u /
Coliform.MF Fecal3l 16 /100ml
Chi a:Corr 2 9 u /I
PO as P 70507 m /I
Sb- Antimony1097 u /1
Coliform MF Total 31504 /100ml
Pheo h tin a 32 213 u /I
P: Totai as P 665 ns /I
Se- Selenium 114 t u /I
Colifotm:Tube Feco131615 /100m1
Color:True 80 Pt -Co
t
P: Dissolved as P 666 m /I
7n- Zinc 109 /1
Colilorm:Tube Total 31505 /100'1
Chromium: Hex.1032 ug/I
A - Silver 1077 u /I
Pesticides Specifically.
Residue Total 500 m /i
C anide 720 m /I'Al
- Aluminum 1105 u /I
-Volatile 505- m /I
Fluoride9 1 mg/I
Be- Beryllium 1012 /I
Scan Organochlorine
Fixed 510 m /I
Formaldehyde 71880 m /I
Co- Calcium 916 m /I
Scan Or anophos horus
Residue:5 ended 530 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 m /I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 /
Volatile 535 m N
Hardness:Total 900 M/I
Co- Cobalt 1037 u /I
10rcianics Specifically
Fixed 540 m /I
IMBAS 38260 m /I
Chromium: otal 1034 u /i
2 Azl03
\ . fi units
Phenols 32730 u /I
-Cu-Coppe,
1042 u /I
Scan Base / Neutral Extractables
A,;dily to PH 4.5 436 m /I
Sulfate 945 m /I
Fe- Iron 1045 /l
Scan Acid Exlractables
Acidic y to PH 8.3 435 m /I
Sulfide 745 m /I
H -Mercur 0 u /1
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 m /I
2
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm
Li - Lithium 1132 u /I
Special Analysis $ ecificoll
Alkalinity to EH 4-5 410 m /I
2
Biomass Dry Wt. 573 g/M
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
TOC 80 m /I
2
Biomass: Peri Ash Free 572 9/M
Mn -Manganese 1055 Tg/I/I
Scan Acid Herbicides
Turbidit 76 NTU
2
Chi aPeri Fluro 82547 mg/M
I
Mo-Mot bdenum 1062 v /l
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
PT
6 2
Water Temperature('[)
t0
0. .
300
pH
400
Conductance
°t25'C
94-
Alkalinity
PH 8.3 PH 4.5
182244 431
Acidity
PH 4.5 PH 8.3
82243 82242
Secchi(Meters)
78
Air Temperature{'[)
20
D.O. % Saturation
301
Salinity%,
480
Algae;Flooting Mats
Severity
1325
Precipitolion(In/Day)
45
Cloud Cover;%
32
Wind Direction(Deg-)
36
Wind Force
Beoufort
37
1 Hr. Settles a
Matter[m1111Hr1
50086
Dead Fis
Severity
11340
Turbidity Severity
11350
Odar:Atmosp ere
Severity
11330
Stream flow
Severity
11351
Detergent Su s
Severity
1305 j
Oi -Grease
Severity
1300
Floating Debris
Severity
11.345
Sludge Severity
DMI/Revised iL