NCG080201_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160721

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO. /V
OOC TYPE iVHISTORICAL FILE
1 MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

/AfC�?o,9a2 0/
el VG
Public Worla
Department
Stormwater/Erosion and
Sedimentauoii Control Program
Ciryarwinnon Salem
PO Box 2511
Winston Went NC 27102
CttyLiftk 311 (336 727 9000)
Fix 336 74S 3173
mtrxasaarueuWenINA14MY
July 21, 2016
Johnny Sheets
Maintenance Foreman
HFCS Transport Company
P O Box 12789
Winston Salem, N C 27117
Dear Mr Sheets
The,Stormwatet Division of the City of Wmston-Salem would hke to thank you for
yow time and professional courtesy regarding the July 13, 2016 inspection of
HFCS Transport Company
As per your request, a copy of the completed surface water inspection form has
been enclosed to you Part 4 of this report (Requited Actions to be�completed by
Facility) contains Annotations #147 that HFCS Transport Company must,
complete Please provide documentation that verifies HFCStTransport Company
successful completions of the corrective measures to me by Opffi r 21, 2016
The Stormwater Division reserves the right to enter and'inspect HFCS Transport
Company as often as necessary, to determine compliance with permit requirements
of NCGO80201
Thank you for your continued support and implementation of the City of Winston-
Salem's Stormwater Program if you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me at [phone]
Sincerely,
Ladofita Clark (Jamal)
Stormwater Inspector
Phone [phone]
Cell 336 416 2403
Fax [phone]
City Coan& MawrAllm folftg ".:an K Elwke, Moyw rm rempma Nanhemt Wad Deane D Ad+mti Na nh Dan Bc S—il,.. Iv/,rd. P.*,, [ Cluk W aTud
MaQV I.elght Sautlt Wsrd: Winds Mertehel Nonhwnt Wad: L)tmin I MomSomery Fin Wad: farad Taylor Jm' Sowlr t %rd, Chy Msnmger Ire D Garhy
Call 311 or 336-727 8000
cltyllnk@cltVofws,org

I
Stormwater/Eiosion Control Division
Surface Water Inspection for Industrial Sites
Gene-raf Information
A) Official Company Name HFCS Transport Company
B) Physical Address 4001 Overdale Road Winston-Salem, NC 27107
C) Telephone,Number [phone] Mairihne
D) Mailing Address, if different from above address P O Box 12789 Winston Salem, N.0 27117
E) Authorized contacts to represent company in environmental regulatory issues
Primary contact Johnny Sheets
Title Maintenance Foreman
Contact number(s) [phone] Cell Phone
Entail address jsheets�7a hfcstransport com
Secondary contact Sherri Nelson
Title Terminal Manager
Contact number(s) Office [phone] Cell Phone [phone]
Email address [e-mail]
F) SIC Code Number of business SIC41
G) NC Stormwater NPDES Permit Number NCGO80201
Permit Categoiy Vehicle maintenance
H) Any other control authority permit(s) (air duality, control, wastewater, hazardous waste) & number(s)
Waste water permit # 1193 (Sur-8116)
I) Brief description of industri'al, activities, that occur on -site
HFCS Transport Company delivers bulk items to manufactures and repairs commercial fleet.
1) Ultimate Receiving Waters South Fork Muddy Creek
TMDL stream ®Yes ❑No
Part'1 Controls
l Best Management Practices
a List the non/structuial controls employed by the
1. AST tanks are used to safely store fuel
2. The fueling station has a roofing over it

w
b Are the BMPs reasonable & appropiiate for the facility? ®Yes ❑No
Comments
Please clears up the trash at the back side of the property near fence
c Are BMPs�installed correctly, maintained, and effective operating condition? ®Yes ONo
Comments
The fueling station has a roofing over it to protect it from mixing with the elements
2 Provide,a,biief description of other controls that rnanage/prevent/nummize stormwater runoff
(e g , erosion and sediment controls, inlet protection/control at storm drains, diversion structures)
HFCS Transport Company uses a dike to prevent any contaminants from reaching stormwater
runoff,
'Part,2—'Miscellaneous
l Any evidence of discharge to receiving waters/MS4? (e g stormwater i unoff, dry weather discharge, co -
mingling of process wastewater) ❑Yes NNo
Comments
2) Do the stormwater outfafls on -site correspond with those listed on the site map and in SPPP?
®Yea t]No
Comments
Yes, the stormwater outfalts on -site corfespond with those listed,on the site map and in
SPPP

3) Summary of Stormwater Discharge Outfalls
SDO Identification
Potential Pollutants that
Physical Location
Latitude and
could be discharged
Longitude
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near truck parking
Lat 36!039503N
SDO 1
Syrup, and Powered
Long-80126878W
starch
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near truck parking
Lat 36 0381111 N
SDO 2
i Syrup, and Powered
Long-180 227242 W
starch
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near truck parking
Lat 36 037922 N
SDO 3
Syrup, and Powered
Long 80 22700OW
starch
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near backside of property
Lat 36 09547N
SDO 4
Syrup, and Powered
near Old Milwaukee Road'
Long 80 227378W
starch
Site Overview
Part,3 =SPPP+Revtew (can be completed�in office),
Yes No Notes
Is there a SPPP?
✓
Does SPPP include a certification statement by the responsible
✓
Please provide and update
corporate officer?
the signed certification,
statement by the,
responsible corporate.
officer
Does the general map depict the facility's location on a USGS
✓
quad map (or equivalent reap) with receiving waters (or MS4)
listed?
Identification of impaired waters or watershed (if applicable)T
✓
Nanative Description,of these Industrial Activities
Stoi age Practices
✓
Unloading(Loading Activities
✓
Outdoor Processes
Pailiculate,Generating/Contral Processes
✓
✓
Waste Disposal
Does site map denote drainage items flow direction, boundaries,
✓
% impervious, and sti uctures? Also includes SDOs, industrial
activity areas, and site topography?
A list of major spills that have occurred within the past three years
✓
No spills have occurred in
with corrective actions to prevent future s ills ?
the past three years
A signed, annual certification that the facility has been tested for non-
✓
Please produce a signed,
storinwater discharges from the site?
updated annual
certification, that the facility
has been tested for non-
stormwater discharges
from the site,
Comments
Please find the correct latitude and longitude for SDO's,3 and 4' because both coordinates
are not properly labeled on site map.

Stormwater Management Strategy
Yes No Notes
Does SPPP incorporate the nine baseline controls
Feasibility Study (technical & economic review,to minimize pollutant exposure)
Secondary Containment (table summary of tanks, stored materials releaserecords)
BMP Summary (listreg of site structuraUnon aructural practices)
SPRP & Procedures (identified, responsible personnel wJ signatures & dated)
PM &GH (inspection of material handling areas & regular cleaning schedules)
I
Facility nsppetions (biannual inspections of facility and all storniwater cystcros)
Employee Training (annual basis for staff who perform SRP and PM functions)
Resodh§ible Party (specific position(s)-dcvelopmg, implementing, &revismgSPPP)
Amendment & Annual Update (of major spais, nonsw mews BmN sanrphng data
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Needs to be updated
✓
✓
please update and sign
✓
Does SPPP contain completed routine inspection reportshecords
regarding reportable implementation of the mne baseline controls
i e SM'Im lamentation ?
✓
Analytical Monitoring
Are samples collected within 30 minutes of measurable rain events
✓
No AnalyticaN monitoring
and at least 72 hours since the last storm event9
was performed during Year
_
4-- Period, I
Are sam lin events 60 days apart? (EXCEPTION Tier 2 & 3 responses)
✓
Currently Tier 1
Is analytical monitoring complete (including schedule) for each
✓
SDO? mxcEPT1oN PROS)
In Year 3 — Period 2, TSS
Any exceedences of pull`utant parameters when compared against
exceeded bencliiitark values
the permit Benchmark values?
and no Tier one response,
was conducted
Has Facility implemented appropriate,, selected actions to reduce
pollutant doncentiations, m response to benchmark exceedences (if
applicable)?
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No Notts
Is qualitative monitoring being perform_ ed'during measurable,storm
✓
No qualitative monitoring
events9
was performed during Year
4 - Period 1
Is qualitative monitoring complete (including schedule) for each
✓
SDO?
Are mom tot ing events 60 days apart? (EXCLPTION Tier 2 & 3 responses)
✓
Any observable, excessive amounts of pollutant indicatono in
stormwater discharge at SDOs?

Part 4—,Requir�edAct�onsto be -completed hY Facility,
1 Please plug the white five gallon bucket with no plug in the,top of it near the gravel
parking lot area If the bucket is not in use anymore, please properly dispose of it
2 Please remove all trash around the blue SS gallon drum near the gravel parking lot area
Also, please remove the old, torn, and faded safety cone
3. Please update the spill response plan with procedures, responsible personnel, signatures
and the current date
4 Include and update certification statement by the responsible corporate, officer in the
SPPP.
S Please provide a signed,,updated annual certification that the facility has been`tested for
non-stormwater discharkes from the site
G Please find the correct latitude and longitude for SDO's 3 and 4 because both coordinates
are not properly labeled on site snap Once found, please label SDO 3 and 4 correctly.
7. Please list on site snap that South Fork Muddy Creek is a TMDL stream
Company Representatives) that participated in inspection Johnny Sheets
Title(s) Maintenance Foreman
Stag, of Inspection 10 00am
Completion of Inspection 12 30pm
Date July 13, 2016
Signature of Stormwater Inspector r/D►""''�
Title Stormwater_Inspeetor

mm
9lMMFMIWffAl2,!W
1. AA� Alt

July 21, 2016
PteblrcJohnny Sheets
V(lorlcs Maintenance Foieman
Department HFCS Transport Company
StorenwnterMoaeon and P O Box 12789
Sedrrnmatron Control Program Winston Salem, N C 27117
City of Winston Salem
PO Bnz 2511 Dear Mr Sheets
Wtnston Saicm NC 27102
Citybak 311 (336 727 8000)
1= 1367483173 The,Stormwater Division of the City of Winston-Salem would like to thank you for
wwrrumrmlAirenindrrrorn your,tlme and professional courtesy regarding the July 13, 2016 inspection of
HFCS Transport Company
As per your request, a copy of the completed surface water inspection form has
been enclosed to you Part 4 of this report (Requited Actions to be completed by
Facility) contains Annotations #147 that HFCS Transport Company musr�
complete Please provide documentation that verifies HFCS,Transport Company
successful completion of the corrective measures to me by pctbb& 21, 2616.
The Stormwater Division reserves the right to enter and inspect HrcS Transport
C any en as necessary, to determine compliance with permit requirements
of NCG080201
Thank you for your continued support and implementation of the City of Winston-
Salem's Stormwater Program If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me at,[phone]
Sincerely,
Ladonta Clark (Jamal)
Stoi mwater Inspector
Phone [phone]
Cell 336 416 2403
Fax [phone]
City Conn& Mayor Allen Janis V4,." 14 elwkr M:)m Pm Trmpute Nordkw isd Demse ❑ Adamr. Nonh Wank pan gwe Satrtha Ward, Ruben C t.4ek Ww Wardi
Call 311 or 336 727 8000 Mo11y Leighi South Ward Wanda hiewhel tQ.Ah t VArdt Dembi L A{oatgnmoy Fat Wank James Ti}!or ]r $audit ur Wara1 Cay Manager Lee O Cardty
cltyhnk@rttyofws,org

~�1 W�UIIDW LIII
Stormwater/Erosion Control Division
Surface Water Inspection for Industrial Sites
Ge' n al Tn�'o�rmation
A) Official Company Name HFCS Transport Company
B) Physical Address 4001 Overdale Road Winston-Salem, NC i7107
C) Telephone Number [phone] Maiiifine
D) Mailing Address, ►f=different from above address P O Box 12789 Winston Salem, N C 27117
E) Authorized contacts to represent company in environmental regulatory issues
Primary contact Johnny Sheets
Title Maintenance Foreman
Contact number(s) [phone] Cell Phone
Email address }sheets@hfcstransport com
Secondary contact Sherri Nelson
Title Terminal Manager
Contact numbei(s) Office [phone] Cell Phone [phone]
Email address siielsoir@hfcstranspdrt cam
F) SIC Code Number of business SIC41
G) NC Stormwater NPDES Permit Number NCGO80201
Permit Category Vehicle maintenance
H) Any other control authority peirmit(s) (air quality control, wastewater, hazardous waste) & number(s)
Waste water permit # 1193 (Sur-8116)
1) Brief description of industrial activities that occur on -site
HFCS Transport Company delivers bulk items to manufactures and repairs commercial fleet
1) Ultimate Receiving Waters South Fork Muddy Creek
TMDL stream ®Yes ❑No
Pairt�] = Stcirmwater=Control
1 Best Management Practices
a List the nonistructural, controls employed by the tacilr
1 AST tanks are used to safely store fuel
2 The fueling station has a roofing over it

b Are the BMPs reasonable & appropriate for the facility? ®Yeg ONo
Comments
Please clean up the trash at the back side of the property near fence
c Are BMPs installed correctly, maintained, and effective operating condition? ®Yes ❑No
Comments
The fueling station has a roofing over it to protect it from,mixing with the elements
2 Piovide a brief desw iption of other controls that manage/prevent/minimize stormwater runoff
(e g , erosion and sediment controls, inlet protection/control at storm drains, diversion structures)
HFCS Transport Company uses a dike to prevent'any contaminants from reaching stoi mwater
runoff
Part 2 —'Miscellaneous
1 Any evidence of discharge to receiving waters/MS47 (e g stormwater t unoff, dry weather discharge, co -
mingling of process wastewater) ❑Yes ®No
Continents
2) Do the stormwater outfalls on -site correspond with those listed on the site map and in SPPP?
®Yes ❑No
Comments
Yes, the stormwater outfalls on -site correspond with'those listed`on the site map and in
SPPP.

3) Summary of Stormwater Discharge Outfalls
SDO Identification
Potential Pollutants that
Physical Location
Latitude and
could be dtachaiged
Longitude
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near truck parking
Lat 36 039503N
SDO 1
Syrup, and Powered
Long 80126878W
starch
'Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near truck parking
Lat 36 0381111 N
SDO 2
Syrup, and Powered
Long 180 227242 W
starch
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near ti uck parking
Lat 36 037922 N
SDO 3
Syrup, and Powei ed
Long 80 22700OW
starch
Fuel, Oil, Hydraulic Fluid,
Near backside of property
Lat 36 09547N
SDO 4
Syrup, and Powered
near Old Milwaukee Road
Long 80 227378W
star ch
Partf3 ---�,SPPPrReview (can be_completed�in office)
Site Overview
Yes No Notes
Is there a SPPP)
✓
Does SPPP include a certification statement by the responsible
✓
Please provide and update
corporate officer?
the signed certification
statement by the,
responsible corporate
officer
Does the general map depict the facility's location on a USGS
✓
quad map (or equivalent map) with receiving waters (or MS4)
listed
Identification of impaired waters or watershed (if applicable)?
✓
Nariateve Description of these Industrial Activities
Storage Practices
✓
Unloading/Laading Activities
✓
Outdoor Processes
Particulate Generating/Control Processes
✓
Waste Disposal
Does site map denote drainage items flow detection, boundaries,
✓
% impervious, and structures9 Also includes SDOs, industrial
activity Areas, and site topography9
A list of major spills that have occurred within the past three years
✓
No spills have occurred in
with corrective actions to prevent futurespills)?
the past three years
A signed, annual certification that the facility has been tested for non-
✓
Please produce a signed,
stoii_nwater discharges from the site?
updated annual
certification that the facility
has been tested for non-
stormwater discharges
from the site
Comments
Please find the correct latitude and longitude for SDO's 3 and 4 because both coordinates
are not properly labeled on site map.

Storinwater Management Strategy
Yes No Notes
Does SPPP Incorporate the nine baseline controls
Feasibility Study (tei,hmLal & economic ievicw to minimize pollutant exposure)
Secondary Containment (table summary of tanks, stored materials,releaserecords)
BMP Summary (listing of site structural/nonstructural practices)
SPRP & Procedures (identified responsible personnel w/ signatures & dated)
PM & GH (inspection of material handling areas & regular cleaning schedules)
Faci l lty Inspections (biannual inspections of facility and all stormwater systems)
Employee Training (annual basis for staff who perform SRP and PM functions)
Responsible Party (specific position(a)-developing, implementing, &revisingSPPP)
Amendment & Annual Update (of maior spais nnnsw news nmPs, =Ipling data
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Needs to be updated
✓
✓
✓
Please update and sign
✓
Does SPPP contain completed routine inspection reports/records
regarding reportable Implementation of the nine baseline controls
r e SPPP Implementation)?
✓
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No Notes
Are samples collected within 30 minutes of measurable rain events
✓
No Analytical monitonng
and at least 72 hours since the last storm event?
was performed during Year
4 — Period 1
Are sampling events 64 days apart? (LXCEPTION 'tier 2 & 3 responses)
✓
Currently Tier 1
Is analytical monitoring complete (including schedule) for each
✓
SDO? (r.xcr-PTION ROS)
✓
In Year 3 — Period 2, TSS
Any exceedences of pollutant parameters when compared against
exceeded benchmark values
the permit benchmark values9
and no Tier one response
Was conducted
Has Facility implemented appropriate, selected actions to reduce
pollutant concentrations, in response to benchmark exceedences (if
applicable)?
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No Note
Is qualitative monitoring being performed during measurable storm
✓
No qualitative monitoring
events9
was performed during Year
a — Period 1
Is qualitative monitoring complete (including schedule) for each
✓
SDO?
Are monitoring events 60 days apart? (EXCEPTION Tier 2 & 3 responses)
✓
Any observable, excessive amounts of pollutant indicators in
stormwater discharge at SDOs?

Part 4 — Required Anions"to be completed`by Facility
1 Please plug the white five gallon bucket -with no plug in the,top of it near the gravel
parking lot area If the bucket is not in use anymore, please properly dispose of it
2 Please remove all trash around the blue 55 gallon drum near the gravel parking lot area.
Also, please remove the old, torn, and faded safety cone
3. Please update the spill response plan with procedures, responsible personnel, signatures
and the current date
4 Include and update certification statement by the responsible corporate officer in the
SPPP
5 Please provide a signed, updated annual certification that the facility has been`tested for
non-stormwater discharges from the site
6 Please find the correct latitude and longitude for SDO's 3 and 4 because both coordinates
are not properly labeled on site map Once found, please label SDO 3 and 4 correctly.
7 Please lest on site niap that South Fork Muddy Creek is a TMI)L stream
Company Representative(s) that participated in inspection Johnny Sheets
Title(s) Maintenance Foreman
Start of Inspection 10 00am
Completion of Inspection 12 30prn
Date July 13, 2016
Signature of Stormwatet Inspector
Title Stormwater Inspector

A 1/•
4T�)/Iljr l�'fl
i-Lwrt+'y
7 £71i a 1 v ^J"ill ,'crA 4;trE , k E U •Q r y C t�
/ LA!
♦*�' � � R��r lSb'�,,f Iy. F. 1 V�<'i ✓Pj V. <�j�S>� �'�y,. � �1 ['1.� ,�r
lei -� 4 � •].i,
1 17.J wii^ 1 �'� ram- 4 1"' • :A:,,-. rYu�"C � r sit ,,
F,
i. YAn1ir�,
u {I
j � 5 t •' ai, �' •'i1 tFk.
� 4 !�! ktf +�'•t•�AS'1,J �4r•i�q'r 'r,�`., y`9y,�,r Y"k j; 1�.r � �� {�t 4 l,k�a
F r/ : t � l � viWi;�i��r " l F�'� � �r�''r'r .? r � { .� j , •'
,� �. f • �', ty �t: {r �}'-s i � S f- Y F e;4 MIS
,l
i � ii}I. h 1 p ftf g i
dk 1 'l .s i�
MEN
eC: •s�s�#�F— M,iFyJ ,.rwir'. r • jYS-'"a 4. ti:Yr'�7%i
r {4tx",1 �ti� �j;,r't��"+i.�l �r " r ,,.. r�� t. � r�Y`•!✓1. - � • Y�°
.. .�, ny i.'h., yr r4Jio'r xi �s7»S- �Ji�r'1 ,•y�e{dd4�AS Y �dk <4.7r A Su
• 4, % 'Lr -.3 ,� pia �}� fl ".ls.. S',,�5 ,�},7
•_ fi �y a � R '+-FX� ��p r Y� t ,,,.'..Ut r�( '% �. +�C7"esl �i'Ti 'y�' {F }��''Fly "�j � ,�...' 'iW
• o. : ' YM. �' .. 1 1j , r - "' 1, � rwi':. S ,;, , *=� q'tr�;_ t. ��'�I',
5

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCG080201 Effective 11101112 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner HFCS Transport Co
SOC Effective Expiration Facility HFCS Transport Co W/Salem Sit
County Forsyth 4001 Overdate Rd
Region Wnston Salem
Winston Salem NC 27107
Contact Person Johnny Sheets Tile Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 08/01/2016
Primary Inspector Glen While
Secondary Inspector(s)
Certification
EntryTime 10 00AM Exit Time 12 OOPM
Phone
Phone [phone]
Reason for Inspection Routine Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1

Permit NCG080201 Owner Facility HFCS Transport Co
Inspection Date 08/01/2016 Inspection Type Compharce Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
(See Inspection Report by Ladonta Clark COWS Stormwater Inspector Dated 7/21/16
Page 2

permit NCGO80201 Owner Facility HFCSTransport Ca
Inspection Date 08101/2016 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
❑ [� ❑
# Does the Plan Include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a Narrative Description of Practices ?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a detailed site map Including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years'?❑
❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
[] ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a BMP summary?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan'?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)v
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
10 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been Implemented?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment (See COWS, Stormwater Inspector's Inspection Reyort attached )
Page 3

Vr
L
eoSciREc��vEn 2050 Northpoint Drive • Suite A
��� ~ N C aspt of DE Winston-Salem, NC 27106
P �&D JAN 2 7 Phone [phone]
9 Fax [phone]
® "Pra=al Engineering & REGIROA"toFFICE geosci Q geotec cam
Fkvwrv7Le? ll&&hmons" www geotec cam
January 23, 2014
Ms Sue White
Assistant Regional Engineer V
Land Quality Section
Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
SUBJECT Request for Representative Outfall Status, HFCS Transport Company, 4001
Overdale Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Dear Ms White
On behalf of HFCS Transport Company (HFCS), Geoscience and Technology, P A (GeoSci) is
pleased to submit additional information pertaining to a request for "Representative, Outfall
Status" (ROS) for two stormwater drainage outfalls (SDOs) Fhe facility is covered under North
Carolina General Stormwater Permit #NCG080000, Certificate of Coverage #NCG080201
Based (in our conversation on November 7 2013 during a ieconnaissance of the l ll"CS site, we
are forwarding laboratory results for a stormwater sampling event oil Novembei 1 2013 These
data aie in support of HFCS's request for Representative Outfall Status (R.OS) for SDO's 002,
003 and 004 Please refer to the attached Figure 3 for SDO locutions Please note that the original
request for ROS submitted to Corey Basinger at DWQ asked for ROS for SDO's 003 and 004,
however, based on our conversation on 11/7/13, it is our understanding that if the laboratory
results foi all four SDO's foi the last sampling event were relatively similar, that you would
consider ROS status for SDO's 002, 003, and 004 Cho drainage area for SDO 001 is probably

the "worst case" scenario for stormwater contamination as it contains all the sites ASTs and the
fueling area The drainage areas for the other SDO's contain primal ily vehicle parking areas
the results for the 1 l/l/13 stormwater sampling event ate summarized below in Table 1 A copy
of the certified laboratory results for the 1 I/l/l3 event is attached
fable I Stormwater Sampling Results
Benchmark
10000
3000
Outfall #
Date
Collected
Total
Rainfall
TSS
O&G
001 (1 NE)
11/1/13
020
1400
<5
002 (11 SW)
11/1/13
020
800
<5
003 (IV SE)
11/1/13
020
1200
<5
004 (111 NW)
11/1/13
020
400
<5
All result values are mg/L pH is not reported as HFCS measures pH at the time of
sampling and is reported on the DM foi in
Figure 3 indicates that the SDO located at the northwest corner of the site is designated as SDO
004 HFCS designated this SDO as `III NW' on the sampling Chain of Custody Similarly, the
SDO at the southern end of the site is designated as SDO 003 on Figure 3 and HFCS designated
it as `IV SE' The SDO designations on Figure 3 will be used in all future communication
MRCS understands that if ROS is granted for SDO's 002, 003, and 004, qualitative monitoring
will still be required for those outfalls
Please call us at 336 896 1300 or email phd@geotec cam if you have questions concerning this
course of action or require additional information
With best regards,
GEOSCIENCE AND I ECHNOLOGY, P A
V �
Peter H DeVrtes
Project Geologist
Ms Sue White January 2 3, 2014
HFCS Stoxnnvaler Compliance Page 2

11121 /2013 1632 TAX) P 001
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No 165
Contact_ Johnny Sheets _ Report Date 11/15/13
Client 14 PCS Transport Co
4001 Overdale Rd P O # hrcS 4426
Winston Salem, NC 27107-6155 Date Sample Rcvd 11/6/13
Mentech Work Order # 110613127 Sample W 1 NE Grassi 11/1/13
Parameters Houl Analysis Date RepoWng Limit Ngth2d
Total Suspended Solids 14 mg/L 11/7/13 2 5 mg/L SM 2540 D
Oil & Grease (HEM) < 5 mg/L 11/11/13 5 mg/L EPA 1664A
Meritech Work Order # 110613128 Sample ID Il 5W Grab 11/1/13
Parameters Result mate Reporting Limit Method
Total Suspended Solids 8 mg/L 11/7/13 2 5 mg/L 'iM 2540 D
Oil & Grease (HEM) { 5 mg/L 11/11/13 5 mg/L EPA 1664A
Meritech Work Order # 110613129 Sample ID III NW Grab x 11/1/13
parameters Result Analygis Date Kgporting LimrtLimI Method
Total Suspended Solids
4 mg/L
11/7/13
2 5 mg/L
SM 2540 D
Oil & Grease {HEM)
c c; mg/L
11/11/13
5 rng/L
EPA 1664A
Meritech Work Order #
110613130 Sample ID
1V'SE Gi ab -
11/1/13
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reny prong Limit
Method
Total Suspended Solids
12 mg/L
11/7/13
2 5 mg/L SM 2540 D
Oil & Grease (HEM)
< 5 mg/L
11/11/13
5 mg/L EPA 1664A
I hereby certify that I Have reviewed and approve these data
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reldsville, North Carolina 27320
tel [phone] fax [phone]

RC
W
LS
C
SDO 00
L
SDO 001 Location
Lat: 36.039503 N
Long: 80.226878 W
SDO 003 Location
Lat: 36.037922 N
Long: 80.227000 W
SDO 001
. l=mMM"iM"iii=rM"� iris lim rill""■ mama m"="Mmmmi=m1
ir�•��+�;Y: !ll.M"wIMimM"=m"mi"iiMnMm •mt "mi"ii""MmMMliiimmll"M"l■■■ lllli"""l""Mitii"l""mmimm==in mmm=inm=m=mminmmM"Mm""MiM""win"m"ii"Mmrimiilm=l"imrl1l
l.!mmimMl"w""l"ilmll"Ml!mml"!rr
i"""Mmll■ lm"i"Mmrmwiw""""=iwi•-mmmilmil�
}: l==miMmmimM=="imii M"MiiM. l""M==N"==m==m====r lml mmimrl,
l—wwmmm=li"=mwm=mmmr !"MMMrimlr
lMli===mmMmMi�"M=mil
lM"i"immwi""""��ii=il lmmulw"imllr
lM=imsim=mmmmmmam==r limn
Ai"iimmiminimii!•ilml �mmlCsi
■ l=m=m=Mi=mmmm=mm� mil Zm=
.minim=mmmmmmmmmmi.�ml "M — l!"!�
r
liMiM=mmmMm==minmmm�r .ill 7i !="= i!r
lii wi immmii ii miiiw•4•f
lim min imm"min="min"i==1 liim "!i
lmmmmmmmmmmlmmm=min"\ !il" "!i
lmmmm="m=mmimmmmmin=1 � ■ 1 l""m lilt
l�Mlili N""mi""ii mi M"M Mf A"ii ill
1 l""m�wy ""Mil"mmiil lwim Ms,
l""i""w"��""iiii r !w"•. l!
iCCCw—CC.mnCCCCCCCwCmmf lllM ' win
Office & rm i"1 !Minn "lr •
Maintenance!Minn"im"mMl"iM"mMMMI r—M"MmiiM
liiiMmimi"MM"M"Mmmir lm►�i==iill
Building ASTAl""m"MMiM"M"im""lilt limill..lM"li
lMiiimM=M"MMiiiim=m1 liMv iMi i=
� .imiimi mini min=mmmmmml !"m"�Mimli
Q .mmmmm==m=m=mm=m=mil l""M"i=ii
lllmmlm mmmmimimmlml r."miw Mill
Fueling
Pi ing
lM����wil""iil"mmill rmm"l r.�r.
! MiM MMMMi"MM"l"""Mil 4.YI � ►.• -'
+i min=m"�mmmm=m i wm=m r
- iim"_Min ii mllmiimmml 1 �
!m"r. �i"""liml""mill f •
•ack
liil mlim"imr.r�""Mmll
Dike/Berm
lMMM"MMMMM=msM""iim. i
.. llwl"iilwmiiwwlill"1
li ii MMMli liiii MMiiil r
!M""iii=•w Mwmii"=Mill l
r.�f. !im=ii=iM lmlii mini mMl i r
L- -^l"Mill! siniml i=mlll I 1 !
■MlmMlm 1=Mil
.Mll min- Ilimml. ■ �
GRASS
■iii Mim 1M""!
•------ 1----
.wwiiim
.mmimwrl liw"r
SDO 002 Location
Lat: 36.038111 N
Long: 80-227242 W
SDO 003 Location
Lat: 36.039547 N
Long: 80.227378W
Overdale Road
Note: All parking areas within
the chain link fence are asphalt
paved
SDO
Total
Drainage
Area (Ac)
Total
Impervious
Area (Ac)
Total
Pervious
Area (Ac)
% Area
impervious
1
0.82
0.70
0.12
85.85%
2
1.34
1.23
0.11
91.93%
3
1.68
1.64
0.04
97.88%
4
0.65
0.45
0.19
70.13%
Total
4.48
4.03
0.45
89.91%
-iiQ z �---�
.>� Gate
----- PropertyLine
--- Drainage Boundary
- — — — — - Chain Link Fence
�i Slope/Flow Direction
® Vehicle/Fleet Parking Area
Stormwater Diversion
/Conveyance
0 Culvert
® Concrete Containment

SDO 00
J
SDO 001 Location
Lat: 36,039503 N
Long: 80,226878 W
SDO 003 Location
Lat:36.037922 N
Long: 80.227000 W
r• •0
--------------------------------------------------------------
� wiilii_!�i-�ii��_�_iili l_i!_i i!■ wlll iiii it li iiiiii-�
.l li_!!!�- !!!!!!i_. wllliiiiilili il_i_iil wl liii_l�
.!!!!!!! •+ • l!i-!_i _■ w_li li_�iiiilii!!!il
w_i_!!!_ i_!ilii _■ w_l_i__l_ll_l_i l_ll
.!!!!!!!!!_!!!!!ill----------_ -■ ._ l _-l_ i l__l l __ l_ l _�
��--��----iii--- �-- -----i--
w__l_i_illsilllAill�
l � i wl_lii �l-i-ll!\ ilk
w ill i i l l l li ii lii li ��
SDO 002 Location
Lat: 36.038111 N
Long: 80.227242 W
SDO 003 Location
Lat: 36.039547 N
Long: 80.227378W
Uverdale Road
Note: Ali parking areas within
the chain link fence are asphalt
paved.
SDO
Total
Drainage
Area (Ac)
Total
Impervious
Area (Ac)
Total
Pervious
Area (Ac)
% Area
Impervious
1
0.82
0.70
0.12
85.85%
2
1.34
1.23
0.11
91.93%
3
1.68
1.64
0.04
97.88%
4
0.65
0.45
0.19
70.13%
Total
4.48
4.03
0.45
89.91%
-------lit
._lii_llwt
ill
w AG7_
_l
iwl
will
will
l.i
11
will
!it
will
irl
wi--
lrt
will
Iwii—
iw
ww
will
will
+
it
iw
will
in
Anil
i!__w,1
w\
i_!!llwt
wllis__l�
.11ll___i
SDO 003
1
1,
'.\ SDO 002 j
ZASS I
I�
® Gate
—•-- Propertyl.ine
--- Drainage Boundary
- -. — — — - Chain Link Fence
a Slope/Flow Direction
qMH Vehicle/Fleet Parking Area
Stormwater Diversion
/Conveyance
Culvert
Concrete Containment

r _ a
eoSc](5nce &
� ��0 9 TP
® "Practical Etgmeenng &
Etvtmnmental Solutions"
October 16, 2013
N C DeAt of ENR
OCT 2 x 2013
Winston Salem
uraiona! office
Mi Corey Basinger
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
2050 Northpoint Drive • Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
geosci @ geotec corn
www geotec com
SUBJECT Request for Representative Outfall Status, HFCS Transport Company, 4001
Overdale Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Dear Mr Basinger
On behalf of HFCS. Transport Company (HFCS), Geoscience and Technology, P A (GeoSct) is
pleased to submit this request for "Representative Outfall Status" (ROS) for two storinwater
drainage outfalls (SDOs) The facility is covered under North Carolina General Stormwater
Permit #NCG080000, Certificate of Coverage #NCG080201
se rr l Icase V[ r to the attached F',gwes 1 and 3 foe SDO locatrotis cmul site featuttN Thv u figuies are
from the SP3 and were recently updated according to comments from your office HFCS
historically collects semi-annual stormwater samples at SDO 001 and SDO 002 SDO 003 was
created when the parking area was extended n1 the southeast corner of the lacrhty in 2012 SDO
004 is locmated at the northwest corner of the facility and has not been previously identified as an
outfall Activities occurring within the drainage areas for SDO's 003 and 004 are identical to
those for SDO 002, therefore HrCS requests ROS for SDO's 003 and 004 Please note that the
there is an asphalt berm that diverts stormwater drainage to the fueling rack area and from the
vicinity of AST-1 towards SDO 001 therefore, the only activities within the drainage aica for
SDO 004 are fleet and employee parking, which is identical to activates within drainage areas

for SDO's 002 and 003 HFCS understands that if ROS is granted for SDO's 003 and 004, that
qualitative monitoring will still be required for those outfalls
Please call us at 336 896 1300 or email phd (-UeoteL com if you have questions conr,eining this
course of action or require additional information
With best regards,
GEO CIENCE AND 1 ECHNOLOGY, 1' A
Peter H DeVries
Project Geologist
Mr Corey Basinger October 18,2013
HFCS Stormwater Compliance Page 2

N _ _
j" -- •••
j l3TV
i r w ti '76
i � .c a v'i,%. ' • w I v y �,' • I A_ ,� E � �y"*� � �w rf �1�
fit
r+� � � *'� *'f � � ....�t a� /J*•y � ��1'� 9 �,��� / ��r*�����K:,I�` �,4 EI
- J'�, �� _ �£ � I I �i' —_�=yam:.,! .� �f •�'
rN � . . . •F / • r n. "'"'-� '7 d ! t1�"44�1X-"` �` 1 ���`..5d�`� i ' 7-t ��
�a a I � I' \� �- � t•-f r� t, �. `�^rr rk.` r� ��� f .�y�r � ��
�,� 4 Fi • � � � r"T 'E1�� *�• 6 ,/frr� �w ,r�l� �a � �� �'T,.'��s vs � Al
I�Jr,� t i } l3� ,f' (.��'J"1 s y �"1\i-•'^�. r�"�� If tl,`�L44 f f rF i '� � �+,y� %' �f �F
- i {� t � � ��JS'7 -'�t� '+►ti. � / � .,tikt��', � �� # JA 5_ �,{ I4� � � , r$��
� � !��! � ,� a � 1� ��-�, � 1� �,1 � ,�,. �J y,5t `?`� I��t � ,,• ii it+�i� is �IL� � ♦r�"r"- �;f
� ++� ff'I • *� •' � r -rw�,`'+�` 1 � s+_-��+;a��+4�� � �` � � ti-r� �/t IE
r'I.... :
1j � fV t �y.'-` �`- a;/ , { L Ile,
I t 1ti
���� �s �`+...; is ������1 ��� l5 �•�.:t,F ��tl 'ti 1
itJ'I
��� � `-... • ' fi ��1.... R t..,,,�.� � 1< ��17� �{I•�' � + `4Y / ��?tf i, r,� r.�
'J}y
(` j • tS
�_fetAl �1�1 f t �rtlL`i F �t4 p t r
4t
� r- 'V d ,y�(�1'rf/'€„ '�'kk5.,��'h� t!' - �{'ti F� �r1� �1 w.�• $dlVi � � .��"�.�' " �'S�la
A;
Note Blue arrows Indicate general direction of stormwater flow from the
subject site Ultimate discharge is to South Fork Muddy Creek, which is not
listed as an Impaired water The general location of the site is 36° 2' 21 07"
W, 800 13' 36 98" N SDO locations are Indicated on Figure 3
ride Project Applor Sc III
Site Location Map HI=CS I ransport Co 1 - 2000' GeoScimc-e &
Adapted from U S G S SW1113 flan eltrnrntdog, IP A
WIltSton^SalLln haSt Job No LoLation FIOUre No PrrkucYrlFuSurrnnrx
1994 Fopooraphic. Map 06 155 Winston-Salcm, NC I Fnirna,,,ewal $Wilue„at
Winston Salim NC [phone]

IV11_q'. Y,
ftuencc1 E1?gIlif'Pillig UL
awon nten tal Sohetoa,S
April 3, 2013
Mr Corey Basinger
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED �I
N C Dept of ENR
APR 0 5 2013
Winsion Salem
Re tonal Ofnc
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
2050 Northpoint Dnve - Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
geosa@geotec com
WVVW geotec com
SUBJECT Response to Notice of Deficiency (NOD), NOD-2013-PC-0122, HFCS
Transport Company, 4001 Overdale Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Dear Mr Basinger
On behalf of HFCS Transport Company (HFCS), Geoscience and Technology, P A (GeoSci) is
pleased to submit this letter in response to a Notice of Deficiency (NOD-2013-PC-0122) from
your office dated March 21, 2013 The facility is covered under North Carolina General
Stormwater Permit 4NCG080000, Certificate of Coverage #NCG080201 This response will
address the deficiencies noted as a result of a site inspection by Ron Boone of your office on
March 19, 2013 This response also includes an estimated timeline for compliance
1) General Location and Site Maps
These two maps will be updated to the permit standards before the end of April 2013 Please note
that the scale of the portion of the USGS map that we used for the General Site Local ion Map
does not allow for placement of the three SDO's In fact the USGS map does not even show the
facility and the approximate facility location is shown with an arrow The SDO's are ,Indicated
on the Site Map with drainage areas and latitude and longitude Furthermore, the topography of
the site is very flat and is not shown on the Site Map Flow directions are indicated on the site
map, which is a general indicator of the topography Overall topography of the area is shown on
the USGS map Please advise if this is not sufficient for the purposes of the SP3
2) Annual Reviews and Certiflcations
Certifications and reviews pursuant to Pat 11, Section A, Paragraphs 1(d) 1(e) and 7 will be
performed on an annual basis in the future A page will be inserted into the SP3 with spaces for
annual certification of the required reviews

3) Analytical Monitoring '
The facility will perform semt-annual qualitative and quantitative analytical monitoring of all
outfalls beginning in the current calendar year
4) Combining SDO's at the North End of the Facility
GeoSci and HFCS are investigating the logistics of combining SDO 001 and the previously
unidentified SDO at the north end of the facility The unidentified SDO is at the inlet end of an
RCP culvert that flows under Overdale Road The road embankment at this location is severely
eroded and must be stabilized prior to sampling at this location GeoSci is currently
communicating with the City of Winston-Salem (CoWS) Stormwater Engineering Department
regarding stabilization of the road embankment the road embankment is not part of the
facility's property and HFCS cannot be responsible foi stabilization of the erosion Furthermore,
some type of catch basin will have to be constructed to allow for collecting a stormwater sample
at thts point It is not feasible to collect a sample at the discharge end of the pipe as it is on
CoWS property and is secured with chain link fencing Any activity related to stabilization of the
road embankment and construction of a catch basin will require approval from the CoWS and
perhaps the NC Department of Transportation (D07) GeoSci will coordinate with these
agencies and provide an update as to the status of combining these outfalls
Please call us at 336 896 1300 if you have questions concerning this course of action or require
additional information
With best regards,
GEOSCIENCE AND I ECHNOLOGY, P A
V k
Peter H DeVries
Project Geologist
Mr Corey Basinger April 3,2013
HFCS Stormwater Compliance Page 2

/ �QF W A TF9Q
�O q
Michael E E.eslcy GO%Lrnor
Wilham G Ross Jr Secretary
North C trohna Departmcnl of hnvironmeni ind N aural RLWUTCe4
CO]tcn H Su]hnti DtrLLtor
Divimon of Water Quality
August 14, 2008
To Regional Office Staff
From The Stormwater Permitting Unit Central Office
Subject Guidance on Reviewing Requests for Representative Outfall Status
At the East/West Consistency Meetings with the Regional Offices in May 2008, regional staff indicated
their willingness and preference to review and document approval of representative outfall status (ROS) requests
from stormwater permittees Before, these requests were processed by the Central Office (CO) However in the
past some requests were neglected or approval/disapproval was left undocumented Below is a checklist of
recommended review points and steps for tracking representative outfall status requests In BIMS If a request
comes to the regional office that you need assistance with or would prefer CO staff to handle we will be glad to
coordinate review with you
1 A word about a Representative Outfall Status request
Our permittees may be eligible for representative outfall status based on the physical facts at their site and on
some other qualifying criteria However granting of ROS is at DWQ discretion We owe the permittee an
evaluation but not a specific outcome The SPU has routinely denied ROS based on review of the submittal
documents or report from the regional office (RO)
2 Guidance on evaluating the initial request
a) Does the permittee's letter identify a physical basis for the request? Does it state that the character of the
stormwater pollution or the potential pollution or exposure is similar in the sub -drainage areas under
consideration?
b) Or, if not very similar, has the permittee indicated that the representative outfall includes the sub -drainage
area with the most stormwater pollution or the potentlalfor the most pollution or exposure (i a the
"worst" sub -drainage area?)
c) The permittee should provide a site map or drawing to show which outfalls he/she is propos ing to be
representative of which other outfalls and which ones will continue to be sampled as single olitfall5
d) While the objective of ROS is to reduce the monitoring burden on the permittee reducing the permittee's
costs is absolutely conditional on establishing the representativeness of the outfall We cannot grant
ROS simply because we think the permittee deserves a financial break
vc°` c3rz
tr�ra�,
�
Nonh Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 Phone [phone]M Customer Ser%ice
Internet www ncwatcruuality ore L(x icon 512 N Salisbury S1 Raleigh NC 27604 Fax [phone] 623 6748
An Equal Opportunity/AHirmative Actien Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Guidance for Reviewing Representative Outfall Status (ROS) Requests
August14 2008
e) Consider the type of industrial activity For example landfills (NCG12) and mines (NCG02) have
changing footprints with higher potential for activities in a sub -drainage area to change, which might affect
our discretion Also, ready -mix concrete (NCG14) and mines may have wastewater discharges on site
with the potential for the two waters to commingle, which might affect the decision
f) If the request is for an individual permit, are the monitoring parameters the same across all the outfalls
being considered as representative/represented?
g) Typically Vehicle Maintenance Activity (VMA) outfal Is may not represent non-VMA outfalls, and vice -
versa
3 Review the file materials and BIMS
a) What is the receiving water classification? The region may choose to consider this aspect
b) Receiving water special circumstances? Impaired? For what? Is there a TMDL and if so, or what? Are
there threatened or endangered species? The region may choose to factor these into its discretion
c) Has permittee paid up? The region could consider withholding approval until past due amounts are paid
d) Past compliance history should affect our discretion Check file and/or BIMS for violations enforcement,
comments history etc and consider how this should weigh into an ROS approval For example if a
facility has failed to perform any analytical or qualitative monitoring whatsoever and has never
implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) asking for ROS may be an attempt to get
out of permit obligations they never lived up to ROS approval may not be appropriate
e) Has past monitoring been complete) If not, has the permittee ignored past monitoring? Or did they
request ROS and never heard back from us so they assumed it was approved? If they ignored
monitoring requirements the regional office may consider denying ROS approval until either (1) there is
enough monitoring data to support representativeness, or (2) the permittee demonstrates diligence in
following permit conditions [How much is "enough' data? Ideally a minimum of eight (8) to 10 samples
but may consider less if other evidence supports ROS request] If the permittee sent us a request that
DWQ never responded to would you have approved it based on their case? Either way keep in mind the
site visit will likely be the most important factor in the final decision
4 Visit the sde
a) The site visit is a critical step in most cases Do the physical facts verify the characterization that one
outfall should be considered representative of another?
b) Look for the most consistently impacted outfall on the site especially if verifying where the "worst case"
runoff flows This is usually near a highly trafficked process or activity area on the site
c) How is general housekeeping? If poor consider whether the operator can confidently assert that one
outfall is representative of others
d) Check out the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) is the permittee using the SPPP as a
management tool and living record? Does the SPPP demonstrate that the permittee is actively aware of
and managing stormwater discharges from the site? If you think it is warranted the region may consider
requiring an updated/sufficient SPPP before continuing review of the ROS request
Page 2 of 3

Guidance for Reviewing Representative Outfall Status (ROS) Requests
August 14 2008
e) Try to pre empt misunderstanding about ROS it allows the analytical monitoring at one outfall to be
considered representative of other outfalls ROS does not change the monitoring frequency required nor
does it change the required monitoring parameters Remind the permittee that ROS also does not reduce
the qualitative monitoring (visual and odor Characterization of the discharge) required at all cutfalls
f) You may need to explain that the final determination is based on the physical facts and DWQ's discretion
DWQ is not obligated to approve a ROS request DWQ may also approve only part of the rE quest or
grant some kind of conditional approval
g) Remind the permittee that if the permit requires a tiered response to benchmark exceedencE s, then an
exceedence at the representative outfall may require attention to other sub -drainage areas represented
by the one outfall (when appropriate)
5 Tacking and documenting Representative Outfall Status
a) Copy the ROS request letter (and site plan if submitted) to the Central Office/SPU, if it did not already go
through us before getting to the region We will keep a copy in the permit file
b) Update BIMS under the Events Tab with the date for "Representative Outfall Status Requested
c) Log any site visit into RIMS as an inspection so you get credit for time spent on ROS review
d) An electronic template of an ROS approval letter is available from the Central Office Please feel free to
modify it as necessary The letter should be signed by the Regional Office Supervisor
e) Copy the final ROS approval or denial letter to (1) Central Office/SPU and (2) DWQ Central Files
f) If approved update BIMS under the Events Tab with date for "Representative Outfall Status
Approved Be sure to include information in the 'Comments' about which outfalls are representative
g) If you deny the ROS request list specifically the basis for denial in the response letter If the denial is
temporary note the conditions that need to be corrected before a re -visit and granting of ROS
h) If you deny the ROS request update SIMS under the Events Tab with date for "Representative Outfall
Status Denied or Revoked Be sure to include comments
i) If there is ever a need to revoke ROS (for example because of changes at the site or because ROS is
compromised in some other way) the regional office should (1) notify the permittee in writing and specify
the reason(s) why and (2) update BIMS under the Events Tab with date for "Representative Outfall
Status Denied or Revoked" that records the date of revocation Be sure to include comments
cc Stormwater Permitting Guidance Materials File
Non -point Source Compliance and Assistance Unit (NPSC&AU)
DWQ Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor Mooresville Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor Asheville Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor Winston-Salem Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Wilmington Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Washington Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor Fayetteville Regional Office
Page 3 of 3

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Chuck Wakild, P E
Governor Director
March 21, 2013
HFCS Transport Co
Attn Sherri Nelson, Terminal Manager
4001 Overdale Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject Compliance Evaluation Inspection & Notice of Deficiency
NOD-2013-PC-0122
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCGO80000
Certificate of Coverage NCG080201
HFCS Transport Co, Winston-Salem Terminal, 4001 Overdale Road, Winston-Salem, NC,
27107 •'
Forsyth County
Dear Ms Nelson
Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ or the Division), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (C.EI) of HFCS's
Winston-Salem terminal on March 19, 2013 The assistance and cooperation during the inspection of
Mr Johnny Sheets was greatly appreciated An inspection checklist is attached for your records and
the inspection findings are summarized below
The facility is located at 4001 Overdale Road, in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North
Carolina, at approximate coordinates 36 0392190N, -80 226940°W According to the current
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3), stormwater related to industrial activity is discharged
from stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO) 001, 002, and 003, to an unnamed tributary to South Fork
Muddy Creek, which is currently classified as a Class C water and located in the Yadkin Pee -Dee
River Basin
Documentation & Monitoring Review
HFCS's SP3, documentation, and monitoring activities were reviewed during the inspection
The following deficiencies were noted
• The General Location Map (GLM) does not meet all the requirements specified in Part II,
Section A, Paragraph 1(a) of the NCG080000 general permit
• The Site Map (SM) does not meet all the requirements specified in Part II, Section A,
Paragraph 1(c) of the NCGO80000 general permit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Winston Salem Regional Office
Locabon 585 Waughtown St. Winston Salem North Carolina 27107 One
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service 1 877-62M748 Noi;ffiCarohna
Intemet www ncwaterquality org 'A'4044�//Y
MEqual Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �/ L� d`

HFCS Transport Co
Attn Sherri Nelson Terminal Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspection NCGO80201
Notice of Deficiency — NOD-2013 PC-0122
3121 /2013 Page 2 of 3
o The list of significant spills has not been updated annually as required in Part II, Section A,
Paragraphs 1(d) and 7 of the NCGO80000 general permit
• The SDOs have not been certified annually as required by Part 11, Section A, Paragraphs 1(e)
and 7 of the NCGO80000 general permit
• SP3 Annual Reviews have not been accomplished as required by Part 11, Section A, Paragraph
7 of the NCGO80000 general permit
o Not all Analytical Monitoring (AM) and Qualitative Monitoring (QM) has been conducted as
required by Part 11, Sections B and D of the NCG080000 general permit The following table
represents what AM/QM records were available during the inspection
Year
Analytical Monitoring
Qualitative Monitoring
2008
1 event
1 event
2009
3 events
3 events
2010
1 event
2 events
2011
1 event
1 event
2012
1 event
1 event
No benchmark exceedences were noted in the available analytical records Mr Sheets did
state that HFCS was not able to collect one of the samples for 2012 due to the lack of, or the
timing of rain events during non -business hours A DMR indicating "No Flow" was submitted to
the Division for this 2012 sample
Site Review
In general, the site was very clean and well maintained However, Mr Boone noted the
following two significant issues
SDO 002, located on the southwest corner of the property, consists of a large stormwater drop
inlet on the southern edge of the parking lot, followed by a rip -rapped channel that is
approximately 70 feet in length During the inspection, Mr Boone noted that a large portion of
the riprap stone is coated with a black substance Mr Boone asked Mr Sheets what the
substance was Mr Sheets told Mr Boone he thought it was the parking lot coating material
used by contractor(s) that HFCS has hired in the past to coat the parking lot Please note that
discharge of this substance from the SDO is considered an illegal discharge and possibly a
spill that should have been reported and recorded as per the terms of the NCG080000 general
permit Mr Boone followed the rip -rapped channel to assess how far the material was carried
off site The rip -rapped channel ends within the forested area to the south of it and it appears
that flow then simply flows into the adjacent vegetated field to the south of the forested area It
does not appear and there is no evidence of surface water impacts as a result of this release
However, HFCS is strongly reminded that spills must be properly reported, recorded, and
cleaned up, and that the discharge of such materials from any SDO is considered an illegal
discharge
There is an additional SDO on the northwest corner of the facility that is not identified in the
SP3 and has not been monitored The SDO drains employeelvisitor parking areas, as well as a
portion of the fueling area on the north side of the facility This SDO should be added to the
SP3 and the stormwater management and monitoring program as a separate SDO

r HFCS Transport Co
Attn Shern Neison Terminal Manager
Compliance Evaluation inspection NCG080201
Notice of Deficiency — NOD-2013 PC 0122
3/21/2013 Page 3 of 3
Alternatively, flow from this SDO and SDO 001, which is located on the northeast corner of the
property, both run through a drainage ditch that parallels the northern property line, along Old
Milwaukee Lane, but the flows are coming from opposing directions Monitoring could be
conducted at the point at which the two flows combine, and a new single SDO could be
identified which drams both drainage areas
The Division requires that HFCS corrects the viol ationsldeficiencies outlined above as soon as
practical Please reply in writing to this letter within 30 business days of receiving it Your written
reply should detail corrective action plans with implementation schedules for each of the
violations/deficiencies noted above HFCS is reminded that violations of the NCG080000 General
Stormwater Permit are subject to civil penalty assessments not to exceed $25,000 per day, per
violation HFCS's written reply, as well as the actual actions it takes to correct these
violations/deficiencies, will weigh heavily in our decision of whether to pursue further action in order to
compel full compliance with the NCG080000 general permit
Should you have any questions regarding the permit, this letter, or the inspection, please do
not hesitate to contact Mr Boone or me at [phone]
Sincerely,
l
W Corey Basinger
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments
1 BIMS Inspection Checklist
cc SWP — WSRO
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCGO80201 Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner HFCS Transport Co
SOC Effective Expiration Facility HFCS Transport Co-WilSalem Sit
County Forsyth 4001 Overdale Rd
Region Winston-Salem
Winston Salem NC 27107
Contact Person Johnny Sheets Title Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC Certification Phone
Secondary ORC(s) I
i
On Site Representative(s) i
i
Related Permits f
Inspection Date 03119=13 Time 09 00 AM Exit Time 1121 AM
Primary Inspector Ron Boone ;2 ! Phone [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil
Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ❑ Compliant ! Not Compliant
Question Areas
■ Storm Water
t
(See attachment summary)
Page 1

Pennrt NCG080201 Owner Facility HFCS TranspartCo r
Inspection Date 03/19/2013 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
Please refer to the attached Inspection summary letter
Page 2

I
Permit NGG080201 Owner - Facility HFCS Transport Co
Inspection Date 0311912013 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
0
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices ?
®❑
D
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
❑
❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
m
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
n
Cl
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
a
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment Please refer to the attached Inspection summary letter
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment Please refer to the attached Inspection summary letter
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitonng from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment Please refer to the attached Inspection summary letter
Permit and Out#allls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfails observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
Comment Please refer to the attached Inspection summary letter
®
l:1
❑ ❑
I
®n0❑
®000
®
❑
❑ ❑
®npn
®nnp
Yes
No
NA NE
❑®�❑
Yes
No
NA NE
i
❑®❑❑
i!
Yes
No
NA NE
❑110E
®00D
nn®n
■
❑
❑ ❑
Page 3

fjiq r Winston -Sale m
1
Industrial Surface Water Reinspection Form
Name of Facility HFCS Transport Company
Date 10/21 /2009
Time 9 00 A M
Comments & Observations
1) Analytical and qualitative monitoring was conducted on June 3, 2009 at Outfalls #1 & #2 No
exceedences of benchmark values or indicators of pollutants were denoted
2) HFCS Company has completed/incorporated the following permit components into its SWPPP
facility inspections, employee spill response training, and a feasibility study
3) Ms Shen Nelson, Terminal Manager, has signed the SWPPP certification statement
4) Drainage areas {and their corresponding percent of impervious coven have been incorporated into
HFCS's site man
5) The secondary spill containment basin, which serves as a spill reservoir for AST #1 and fuel delivery _
tankers, has been repaired In addition, the containment area's release valve is locked
6) HFCS Company has successfully completed all outstanding issues from the City's 1/27/2009
industrial surface water inspection
Facility representative that attended reinspection Mr Johnny Sheets
Title Safetv and Environmental Manager
Signature of City Stormwater Inspector
Title Special Protects Coordinator
Andrew K Allen
TO

February 17, 2009
Mr Johnny Sheets
Safety and Environmental Manager
HFCS, Inc
P O Box 12789
Winston-Salem, N C 27117
Dear Mr Sheets
The Stormwater Division of the City of Winston-Salem would like to thank you for your time and
professional courtesy regarding the January 27, 2009 inspection of HI -CS, Inc
A photocopy of the completed inspection form has been enclosed to you
The Stormwater Division is requesting notification upon completion of Requirements ##1 — 4, that
are denoted in Part 4 of the industrial surface water inspection form Upon notification an informal
inspection will be scheduled for verification purposes
Thank you for your continued support and implementation of the City of Winston-Salem s
Stormwater Program If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone]
Sincerely,
Donald P Donadio
Stormwater Industrial Irispector
City of Winston-Salem
Cc Rose Pruitt, Environmental Specialist with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality

City of Winston-Salem
Stormwater Division
Surface Water Inspection for Industrial Sites
Part 'I - General Information
A) Official Company Name HFCS Transport Company
B) 1 Physical Address 4001 Overdale Road, Winston-Salem
2 Telephone Number 336 785-0035
C) Mailing Address, if different from above address
D) 1 Primary contact who is authorized to represent company in official business
Sherri Nelson
Title Terminal Man
Contact number(s) 336-78 5-0035
2 Secondary contact John Sheets
Title Safety&Environmental Contact number(s) 336-785-0035
E) SIC Code Number of business
4213
F) NC Stormwater NPDES Permit Number'L nca080201
Facility Type
Transit & Trans ortation with Vehicle Maintenance
G) Any other control authority permits) (ex air control, wastewater, hazardous waste) & number(s)
Possible IWC
H) Brief description of manufacturing process of products produced on site
Transportation facility, Transportation terminal for general maintenance and cleaning of
transfer trucks and tanker trailers used for food grade products Diesel fuel, lubricating oil
and other fleet maintenance fluid are stored on site The site is secured and manned
1) Receiving Water(s)IMS4 Lower South Fork of Muddy Creek
Part 1 - Stormwater Controls ,
1 Best Management Practices
a List the non/structural controls employed by the facility
1 Oillwater separator in maintenance facility connected to sanitary sewer_
2 Vegetated buffer around perimeter of property -
4 Block walled containment are facing Old Milwaukee Lane is leaking and should be repaired
V 3141s iZ Iy,vq �

b Are the BMPs reasonable & appropriate for the facility F X yes no
`Comments
c Are BMPs installed correctly, maintained, and effective operating condition? X yes no
Comments
2 Provide a brief description of other controls that manage/prevent/minimize stormwater runoff
(e g , erosion and sediment controls, inlet protection/control at storm drains, diversion Structures)
Run off is sheet flow to grassy areas of outfall 1 on Old Milwaukee Lane, and the other side of
ridgeline is channeled to outfall 2 parallel to Overdale Road
- Part 2 - Miscellaneous ,
1 Any evidence of discharge to receiving watersIMS4? (e g stormwater runoff, dry weather
discharge, co -mingling of process wastewater) Yes X No
Comments
2) Do the stormwater outfalls on -site correspond with those listed on the site map and in SPPP?
t X IYes No NIA
Comments
Part 3 - SPP,PReview can be com feted in office ,3,_ __ _
Genera! NOTES
1 Is there a SPPP?
Yes
No
2) Does SPPP identify a specific position(s) for
responsible party purposes (e g overall coordination,
development, implementation, & revision
No
Sherry Nelson
Yes.
3) Does SPPP designate facility personnel
responsible for implementing SPR?
Yjes
No
4 Does SPPP include a certification statement?
Yes
No
5) Are employee training records regarding stormwater
pollution prevention topics included in SPPP?
No
Yes,
Comments

Site Map
NOTES
1 Is there a site map?
Yes
No
2 Drainage atterns/outfalls
Yes
No
No Rid eline
3) Identification of potential pollutants likely
to be discharged from each drainage area?
No
Yes
4) Narrative Description and locations of (check if present)
1 Storage Practices
2 Unloading/Loading activities
3 Outdoor processes
4 Particulate generating/control processes
5 Waste Disposal
Y
na
na
Y
5 Name of receiving waters or MS4's listed?
Yes
No
6) Locations of significant materials exposed
to stormwater?
No
Yes
7) Locations and descriptions of major spills occurring within the
the 3 pervious years (w/ corrective actions to prevent future spills)?
No
Y s
Stormwater Controls
NOTES
1) Does the SPPP describe the non-structural
controls that will be used to prevent/reduce
discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff?
No
I
Ye_ s
2) Does the SPPP describe the structural
controls that will be used to prevent/reduce
discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff?
No
housekeeping
Yes
3) Does the SPPP describe other controls that
will be used to prevent/reduce off -site tracking
or blowing of sediment, dust, and raw, final,
or waste products, or other solid materials
and floating debris?
No
Yes
4) Does the SPPP incorporate the 8 baseline
controls (good housekeeping, BMP summary,
feasibility study, PM, SPR procedures, facility
inspections, and comprehensive site evaluations,
employee training, secondary containment, and
sediment control?
Yes
Need the
Feasibility Study
Training Records
Facility inspection records
� N_O
5) Does SPPP contain completed routine inspection
reports/logs regarding reportable implementation
of the 8 baseline controls?
Yes
No
6) Does the SPPP describe the pollutant or activity
to be controlled by BMP's and assessed the need
of implementation through data collected?
No
pg 7 sect 5 2
of SWPPP
Yes F
Non-stormwater Discharges
NOTES
1) Certification that the facility has been tested
for non-stormwater discharges from the site?
Yes
Nq
2) Description of testing method, drainage
points, observed results, date, and signature?
Yes
No

Monitonng
1) Are samples collected within 30 minutes of
measurable weather events occurring 72 hours
after previous measurable weather event?
Yes
`No, -,-
2) Were samples collected and preserved in
accordance with 40 CFR 136?
Yes
No
3) Was proper chain -of -custody procedures
followed?
Yes
v No' .
4) Was analytical and qualitative monitoring
complete?
Any exceedences of pollutant parameters in regards
to cutoff concentrations/effluent limits?
Yes
Yes
No
No
L' Part 4 - Re 1114red Actions to be com feted
1 Monitoring needs to be performed Both analytical and qualitative must be
topermit, 20 was absent, on a six month Intervals according 03 monitoring .,,,.
2 Documentation for facility inspection records, employee spill response training,
and feasibility statement must be added to SWPPP
3 Sianed certification statement for SWPPP
4 Site map must show ridge lines and specify Impervious surface area for each
designated outfall
Educational resources
1 NC Stormwater Manual for Industrial Users
http //h2o enr state nc us/su/PDF Files/SW Documents/SWPPP GD PDF
Company representative(s) that participated in inspection Johnny Sheets
Title Safety and Environmental Manager
Start of Inspection
9ooam
Completion of Inspection
Date 111/2709
11 30
Signature of City Stormwater Inspector
Title Industrial Stormwater Inspector

I
Ni.
- I ,
Qk
X, w,
4. 2N,
jljt,,. 1, i I Zj
J,
F�l p kN
14
ti �j �1.
941
W t'-

Michael F Eisley Governor
Wilhara G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment utd N'rlural Resources
Coleen H Sullins Director
Division or Water Quality
May 2, 2008
Certified Mail 7007 3020 0000 6279 7860
Ms Sherri Nelson
`i eiminal Manager
4001 Overdale Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Re Notice of Violation
NCGO80201
Forsyth County
Dear Ms Nelson
A storm water inspection was performed at HI✓CS rransport on May 1, 2008 by the Winston-
Salem Regional Office of the Division of Watcr Quality Phis inspection falls under the
provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1
At the completion of the inspection the following item as noted below was found to be in
noncompliance with hermit NCGO80201
1 1he Storniwater Pollution Prevention Plati was unavailable for review
The Stormwater Pollution Prevention flan is currently under development by a consulting firm
Although the plan is not available the facility is currently complying with components of the
plan which include
i Qualitative nionitoinig
2 Analytical monitoring
3 Training
4 inspections, and others
The facility has also undertaken improvements to the two disc,liarge locations oit site It is felt,
the facility with a minimal amount of improvements would qualify for a non -exposure
exemption
North0irolin i
X7111111111J
North Carolina Divtsion of Water Quality 595 Wiughtown street Winston Sflem NC 27107 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] t
Internet h2o enrstate nc us
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recyoled110% Post Consumer Paper

U.S.
Postal
Service,,,
M�
CERTIFIED
MAIL,,,
RECEIPT
U l�
(Domestic
Mail
Only;
No insurance
Coverage
Provided)
k, T U S E
Er
r` Postage $ E "' la Nov
1 i1J i
1 —0 Carllfled Fee Zf ,
Return flecelpR Fee f' �- j trx Postmark
1 Q (Erniorsemarrt Reaulred)O� t Here
I M Restricted Dellvery Fee
(Endorsement Required) �r y
I M ,I
�Ar
rU Total Pnamn R P--
B"` ' Ms Sherri Nelson
I o vteet Terminal Manager %
I o -PO 4001 Hrdale Road
l'
O's Winston Sale 107

Ms Sherri -Nelson
May 2 2008
pg 2
I his office is appreciative of the cooperative attitude shown by the facility personnel
Please respond to this office within 30 days of ieceipt of this correspondence advising of
corrective actions undertaken concerning the aforementioned violation
If there are questions please contact Marc Stokes at [phone]
Sincerely
(;Y /Z
/wel-
Steve W Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc R Pruitt
WSRO riles

u
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCG080201 Effective 11/01/07 Expiration 10/31/12 Owner HFCS Transport Co
SOC Effective Expiration Facility HFCS Transport Co W/Salem Sit
County Forsyth 4001 Overdale Rd
Region Winston-Salem
Wnston Salem NC 27107
Contact Person Johnny Sheets Title Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC Certification Phone
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 05/0112008 Entry Time 1000 AM Exit Time 11 15 AM
Primary Inspector Marc Stokes Phone [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine Inspection Type Stormwater
Permit Inspection Type Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil
Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ❑ Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1

Permit NCGO80201 Owner Facility HFCS TransportCo
inspection pats 05101/2008 Inspection Type Stormwater
Inspection Summary
Facility does components of the SP3 plan although the plan is development
Qualitative Monitorin
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi annually
Comment
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitonng9
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection'?
# If the facility has representatwe outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the fatality evaluated alE illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment Facility has not completed evaluation for discharges
Reason for Visit Routine
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
Page 2

o�o� w A rF9p�
Michael F Easley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
JOHNNY SHEETS
Hl-CS TRANSPORT CO WIISALEM SIT
PO BOX 12789
WINSTON SALEM NC 27117
Dear Permittee
Alan W Klimek P E Director
Division of WaterQuality
August 23 2002
Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
HFCS Transport Co-Wi/Salem Sit
COC Number NCG080201
Fors} th County
In response to your renewal application for continued cover ige under general pei mit NCG080000 the ]Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is torwarding herewith the reissued Stormwater general permit I his permit is re issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General St itute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of Agi cement
between the state of North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6 1983
The following information is included with your permit package
A new Certificate of Coverage
A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG080000
A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from rerponsibihty
for compliance with any other applicable federal state or local law, rule standard ordinance order judgment, or
decree
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Deionda Alexander of the Central Office
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] ext 584
Sincerely
Bradley Bennett Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permit, Unit
Lc Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
TA
NCQENR
N C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623 7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG080000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No NCG08020I
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYS FEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 f, other lawful standards and
rt.gulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Wati-r Pollution Control Act, as emended,
HFCS I RANSPORT CO
is hun-by uutlion/W to d1%Lhargc, stormwater from a lacality foe ited at
HFCS TRANSPORT CO-WI/SALEM SIT
4001 OVERDALE RD
WINSTON SALEM
FORSYTH COUNTY
to receiving waters designat(d -is a Ur to South Fork Muddy Creek a (.lass C stream in the, Yadkin - Pei DI.L RIVer
Basin in accordance, with the effluent limitations monitoring n.quiremc.nts and other condition~ set forth in Parts 1,
11 1[] IV V, and VI of General Permit No NCG080OW as attached
This c.erttf-te ate of cov( rage shall hc(.OML (.ffUttva. Seplember 1 2002
This CUtificate of Coverage %hall runain in effect !or the duration of the, General Permit
Signed this day August 23 2002
for Alan W Klimek P E Dire( for
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the, Environnmental ManageniLrit Commission

Michael F Eac ley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Ervironmeni and Natural Resources
Gregory J Thorpe PhD
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
DLLLInl 27 2(H)I
J()IINNY SHll
Hill I RANSPOIZ I Co) WlPsAI FM 51 I
110 BOX 127S()
WINS ION SALEM NC 27107
iutllLLI NPDES Storin%� itt r PLinitl RLm,%% 11
1-11"CI, TRANSPOR Y CO WI/SALENI Is]
COC Nulilb(,r NCG080201
Fors) Ill County
DL it PLi iniat,
YOM I IL1111y I1 LuirLntl} LON1,1i lot 1toini%au-r dt1L11 ii un(ILr GLnLr d PLruilt NCGil I his pL1111II LCl)itL1
On All 31 2(X)2 I hL I)1Vt11011 a tit i1 Lutri-ntly in IN, proLL11 of rc,Wnting this pLnnit Inca 11, VAL(Ili ul 11IV(-
Ill pu 11111 1Li1SlILd by 1 111L 1IIn1111M of 2(X)2 Ill lhL po nlit 11 rL111uLd your I ILlhty would Ill LhgIIAL for
LOnllntiLd (.(IVLi I"L UI1dL1 111L. ILI%sLILd P0Illlt
111 01 (ILI to 1SSUIL )Our LtlntlnLILd LONLI I'll-i1dLr 1 thL -LnL1 it pLitnit you alum 1ppl) to IN, DIV1110i1 01 Ail IILI
Qtl dlty (DWQ) tOi 1LnLW it (it y(lln 1)LII111t LOVLI ISSk, 170 111 16- 11111 ILfli Il pli L V,1L1 WL IIL In1O11n111g VOLI In
IdV BILL th 11 )Out I)LI1111t Will hL Lxl)Il111" I'11001Ld YOU �k ill hnd I Gul(.r11 Pcrnnt Goi Lr tgL RLiv w ll
ApphL rturri I orni 1 hL 111I111L uilln nnitit hL L01np1LILd lull rLturnud by M irdi 4 2002 In ORILl Itl I11LnL ulnllnuLd
LOVLI IgL Undcr thL �'LnLI 11 I)LI n111
I' UIL1IL 10 ILLluL1t i iLb1' It within Ibis 11111L 1)Lr10d ill ly IL` Ult Ill t 011 a15L11InLnt 01 it IL Ist $250 00 L u Lr
1)Lil 1111L1 In ty hL 111Lti11,Ll dt-I)LIldIn" Oil IhL dLh1l(jULnL) 01 IbL ILL1lILtI D11Lh ll`_'L 01 SI01I11W IILI 11nn1 )'Mil t,iLlllty
W10101.11 L(1VL1 Ill(, u1)(10 .l V Ihd ',Ioilnw il(,r NPI)ll I)LIIIIIt 1AOL 111 corii I viol ition of NCGi 141-215 1 uld
L(luld 1i In V sLY1IllLllts oil LIk II I101 1111L1 01 tip to $100N) pLr d Ly
PIL 11L ROIL 111 11 ILI-Lilt ILdLI 11 ILg11t ItIOII 11 11 LVILIIdLd 111E 110 LXPOsurL cxdumOn to Ill 0[-X t ttllll QI 1ndLl111 t 11
I ILIIIIILI in ill) 01 l I I L 1IL`I'OI IL1 01 %totni w oLr (Ill Ill 111(1LL ItLd with industri It 1Ltivit) (L\LLpl
LOIikIL1IOn ILI]' It1i 11 )OU ILLI y01.111 I ILIIIIy L III LLI Illy I Londition of no LxPO%UIL I L IIlL I UJIly IndtI%lll 11
III itLrl IN Ind ol1Lt ilior a1L ri Lxl)oNLd to slo11n" IILI )ou L in apply for IIIL no Lxposii 1ALIl lulu I -Or iddluon 11
In1011111 11110111 4,0111 ILI lhL, CLiltl Ill 011IIU. SIL)I low tIL1 Sit Ili 1114,11ill 111tL(I l lo\v 01 LhL(,k ik Stoll tl(,i cti GLIiLI 11
PLtnnI1 Unit WLh S11L it hill) //h20 Lnl st IIL I14, L1%A11./401111A tlLr htinl
11 t11L 1L1b1LLl sturinN 1tL1 Lh1c11 trgL 10 W lit i 1 01 IhL tit ItL 11 is 11LLn ti-1 n1111 ItLd pIL iti(, LOIIIJ)ILIL Il1L L11LlO1Ld
RLSLISSIQn RLgii I Orin Mailing 11111rL1L(rons IIL 1111LL1 011 111� bOttOitl 01 thL 1Or111 You �1Ill hi, 11nu1ILLI \41101 1hL
r(,1Li11ion prnLL11 h 11 bLLrl Lt11np1LILd
11 YOU 11 IIL Ill) (1UL11Elllri ILL' uLIInLI lhL l)Lrnllt ILIlLVt it prOLL(IuILti pIL 15L Lonlact Coil) B Of (hL
Winston S ilLn) lzt-own Il (lttiLL it 116 771 4600 of Ddond i A1Lr indLr of IhL CLIIII Il 011iLL Sloini",itLr Unit
(LJ 19) 711-5{}81 L\l 584
SIIILLILI4
Br aIILy Bt-nnut SupLl 11nr
,�t011nw IILI Lind GLnLr it PLtnull Unit
LL Unit it Fik's
Wl1lslOn-" 11Li11 i6-t 10n 11 011iLL
N C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone]
®gin
NCDENR
Customer Service
1 80C 023 7748

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B Hunt, Jr , Governor
Jonathan B Howes, Secretary
A Preston Howard, Jr, P E , Director
August 26, 1994
Mr Philip H Enscoe
HFCS Transport Company
P O Box 12789
Winston Salem, NC 27107
�EHNF1
Subject General Permit No NCGO80000
HFCS Traqnsport Comapy
COC NCGO80201
Forsyth County
Dear Mr Enscoe
1n accordance with your application for discharge permit received on June 27, 1994, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Aisha Lau at telephone number 919/733-5083
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
COieen H Sullins
A Preston Howard, Jr, P E
cc Winston Salem Regional Office
P 0 Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 0535 Telephone [phone]B3 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT NO, NCQQ80000
CERTIFICATE ERA E No. NCGO80201
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT 1215CHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTE d
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other Lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the Korth Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
HFCS Transport Company
is hereby authorized to continue operation of an oil water separator and discharge stormwater from a facility located at
HCFS Transport Company
4001 Overdale Road
Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to South Fork Muddy Creek in the Lumber River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring regwrements, and other conditions set forth to Parts I, II, III
and IV of General Permit No NCGO80000 as attached
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 26, 1994
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit
Signed this day August 26, 1994
OrlR;itat 5►��ual�s
ccoeo H
A Preston Howard, Jr, P E , Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

1 L%--rll I1111Y.1".\\\\ti �\\C`�\�141��/rA!�Jl((�'6'+l°)li':s"�`'i��F\..\\\\l\\\�tt\�—':�Y:':�///l�Js!"�i/'._�—�.—�i✓/�� `,-%`�,._.'
c
r

r c,,,i. i 9Y n W
4
COUNTY For 5 � f
NPDES C 0 <7 0 01
MAP
St �FR BASIN o 0 -7 `- oq
LAR,WDE Ep O Q ;2 / 3 /(
I. 4NCITUDE V o 1 3) 3 1"
RECc"IVIIgG STREAM V 7" 4-o Sou +d
STREAM CLASS
DISCHARGE CLASS 5 f 6 r ir/A f e o
,a
EXPIRATION DATE �l� � � � R 7