NCG020845_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20161107

PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
DOC DATE
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
/V C�Od0�y5
� HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
YYYYMMOD

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G S 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to
Rick Williford
S&P Sand and Gravel, LLC Mine
Carteret County - Permit No 16-23
for the operation of a
Sand Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE November 7 2016

Mr Wilhford
Permit No 16-23
Page 2
Please review the renewed and modified permit and contact Ms Kristin Hicklin
Assistant State Mining Specialist, at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter
Sincerely,
�`
Flo d R Williams, PG, CPG, CPM
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
FRW/kh
Enclosures Permit No 16-23 and NOI
cc Mr Dan Sams, PE
Ms Shannon Deaton-WRC w/permit
Mr Bradley Bennett-DWQ, w/permit
Mr William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the Department.
and in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of
this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation This permit 3s
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N C G S 74-49
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until November 7, 2016
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N C G S 74-46, et seq , and
to the following conditions and limitations

Page 3
OPERATING CONDITIONS
A Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N C Environmental
Management Commission
B Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N C Envtronmental
Management Commission It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary stormwater permits or
other approval documents
2 A Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shall be subject to
the permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N C Environmental
Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air Quality
B During mining operations, water trucks or other means that may be necessary
shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted area
3 A Sufficient buffer (minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway or wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the
integrity of the natural watercourse or wetland
B Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U S , or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N C Environmental Management Commission
4 A Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land
B All drainage from the affected area around the mine excavation shall be diverted
internal to said excavation or into the existing sediment basins, as indicated on
the Overall View Map A dated May 5, 2006
C No dewatering activities shall occur at this site
D Mining activities shall occur as indicated on the Overall View Map A dated May 5,
2006
5 All affected area boundaries (22 67 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site on
100-foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals

Page 4
6 The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle, which can be
retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided
with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion
7 The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions
8 Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the mine
and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the operation from the public
9 Sufficient buffer (minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
excavation and any mining permit boundary to protect adjacent property
10 A No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan
B Mining refuse as defined by G S 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management No petroleum products, acids solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area
C For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G S 74-49 (14) of the N C Mining Act of 1971)
1 on -site generated land clearing debris
2 conveyor belts
3 wire cables
4 v-belts
5 steel reinforced air hoses
6 drill steel
D If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal
the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area,

/ r
Page 5
2 a list of refuse items to be disposed,
3 verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
�. refuse,
4 verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table, and,
5 verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established
11 An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved
12 The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit or any approved revision to it
Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions
13 The security, which was posted pursuant to N C G S 74-54 in the form of a $14,400 00
surety bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the approved application
This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid The total affected land
shall not exceed the bonded acreage
14 A Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources
B Pursuant to N C G S 70 Article 3, "The Unmarked Human Burial and Human
Skeletal Remains Protection Act," should the operator or any person in his
employ encounter human skeletal remains, immediate notification shall be
provided to the county medical examiner and the chief archaeologist, North
Carolina Division of Archives and History

Page 6
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit
The approved plan provides
Minimum Standards As Provided By G S 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land
2 Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock
3 All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land
4 No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul
5 The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service
6 Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to restore the mine excavation to a lake area dnd to grade and revegetate the
adjacent disturbed areas
2 The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows
A The lake area shall be excavated to maintain a minimum water depth of four feet
measured from the low water table elevation

Page 7
r
3
B The side slopes to the lake excavation shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter to the water line and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below the
water line
C Any areas used for wastepiles, screening, stockpiling or other processing shall
be leveled and smoothed
D No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Condition Nos 10A
through 10D
E The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water
Reve etat+on Plan
After site preparation, all disturbed land areas shall be revegetated as per Revegetation
Plan approved by Mr A Ray Harris of the Carteret County Cooperative Extension
Service for the NC State Cooperative Extension Service, dated April 20, 2006 or per the
following
Permanent Seeding Specifications
Dates Species Rate, Lbs/Acre
February 15- April 1 Kobe Lespedeza 10
Bahiagrass 50
Redtop 1
Winter rye (grain) 15
April 1- July 31 Common Bermuda 50
August 1- October Lespedeza (unscarified) 30
German millet 40
October 25- February 15 Rye (gram- temporary) 120
Soil Amendments
Lime - 2000 Ibs/acre or follow recommendations from a soil test
Fertilizer- 1000 lbs/acre 8-8-8 or 10-10-10, or follow recommendations from a soil
test
Mulch - All seeded areas shall be mulched using small grain straw at a rate of 2000
Ibs/acre and anchored appropriately

Page 8
/ Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N C
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post-pro)ect wildlife habitat at the site
4 Reclamation_ Plan
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining
Permit issued this 7th day of November 2006
Wiwi
OF
114
James D Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed as an adjoining landowner
in the application to modify this mining permit filed by Mr Rick Williford to conduct mining
activities off Bogue Loop Road in Carteret County The mining permit (no 16-23) was
modified on November 7, 2006
North Carolina law allows persons aggrieved by the issuance of a mining permit to
contest the decision by filing a petition for a contested case in the Office of Administrative
Hearings pursuant to N C G S 1508-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
If you believe that you are an aggrieved party within the meaning of the APA and NC
General Statute 74-61, a petition for a contested case must be filed in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within thirty f30} days of the mailing of this notice to you
If you file a contested case petition, it must be in writing and in the form prescribed by
N C General Statutes 1506-23 File the original petition and one copy with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Any questions about filing a petition may be directed to the Clerk of the Office of
Administrative Hearings by telephoning [phone]
You must serve the Department of Environment and Natural Resources by mailing a
copy of the petition to Ms Mary Penny Thompson, Registered Agent and General Counsel,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1601
James D Simons
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural
Resources
This notice was mailed on
Brenda Harris
Mining Program Secretary

Sunland Builders, Inc.
dba Sunland Development & Construction
PO Box 1436
Swansboro NC 28584
Office [phone]
Fax [phone]
TO NCDENR Land Resources
Bnan Lambe
127 Cardinal Dr Ext
Wilmington NC 28405
WE ARE SENDING YOU
[Shop Drawings
Attached
Letter of Transmittal
Date Febuary 6, 2014
Attention Bnan Lambe
Pit S&P Sand & Gravel - Bo ue Pit #16-23
Re COC NCG020845 NPDES Gen Permit
QPrints
0 Copy of Letter
BY.
0 Specifications
= Other
Copies
Drawing No
Description
1
Mine Operations Plan
1
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with E&SC calculations
1
Mine Map dated Feb 2 2014
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED FOR
E] For Approval
For your use
=As Requested
Returned for Corrections
[—jReturned Corrected Prints
For Revrew and Comment
Remarks Please note the attached documents are intented to meet the administrative reauirements of
our wastewater dischare permit for initial 2EEroval We note on this same day submission
of Mine Modifications Letter, 100E fee and other documents were made to the central office
The LISCoTs of Engineers is scheduled to complete wetlands identification
and flagginq for transfer to our Mine Mari on March 4. 2014 _
Copy To
Sent Via LISPS
If Enclosures are not as noted, please notify us immediately
Signed
Mtchelte Benton PE
Quality Control Specialist

4,
r�
I
c
f
Cer0cation
The following certification is due upon initial submission of the SWPPP and at least
annually along with the submission of required monitoring test and or modification of
operations and or BMP's It must be signed by an owner who is responsible for oversight
of all operations and activities The certification assures that the stormwater outfall has
been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges The owner should include a
paragraph explaining the effectiveness of the erosion and stormwater BMP Certification
and updating of this SWPPP are required at a minimum annually
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on
my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, true, accurate, and complete I am aware that there are sign cant penalties
for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations
Name (prin
Signature:
Title:
Date Signed: Z /Zlv

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
Bo ue Pit
Mine Permit # 16-23
General Nationwide Discharge Permit # COC NCG020845
Project Site Location Addresv Old Whtteoak rd, off F end of Bogue Loop Rd
County, Mailing Cttv State Zap Code Carteret County, Newport NC 28570
Project Site Telephone Number NA no office on site
Operator(s):
Company or Organization Name S & P Sand and Gravel, LLC
Name Charles R Williford & William K Page
Address PO Box 1436, 4846A Hwy 24 E f
City State, Zip Code Swansboro, NC 28584
Telephone Number 252-393-2504
Fax [phone]
Stormwater Manager and SPPP Contacts):
Company or Organization Name Same as above Operators
SPPP Preparation Date:
01 { 2014

STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECTION PLAN (SPPP)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Bogue Pit is operated to mine sands and gravels without the addition of processing at
the site Mine operations are regulated by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Energy, Mineral and Eared
Resources by issuance of Mine Permit # 16-23 In general the permit requires the owners
to manage the mine to limit the current and future impacts to the environment, typically
by requiring sediment and erosion control practices along with safe guards to contain the
operations within required and designated buffers along property lines, wetlands and
streams Restoration of mined areas upon completion of mining within any area of the pit
is of utmost concern The permit and bond indicate the allowable affected area and other
key permitting issues if operations result in discharges of stormwater runoff or process
wastewater off site, then the state's Division of Water Quality requires permitting of
wastewater with a General Permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES)
By historical operations the pit has been mined such that a large wet detention basin has
formed and is used for both erosion and sediment control along with the protection of
surface water quality The wet pond overflows are considered wastewater and are a
result of direct rainfall and stormwater runoff along with minor process water such as that
used for dust control The Owners filed and received NPDES Nationwide General
Discharge Permit # NCG020845 The permit requires the owners to implement best
management practices to protect the water quality of both the receiving stream and any
other high quality resources such as wetlands Routine weekly inspections along with
monitoring of the wastewater discharges for specific water quality parameters is required
both quarterly with two of these test conducted near the start of rainfall events semi-
annually Owners must assure that operators and staff are properly trained in procedures
to protect the surface waters of the state and maintain the required records of activities
Annual reports are required along with submission of testing result
The generation of a mine plan is required under the Mine Permit and additional
information regarding water quality and best management practices is required to be
added to the plan by the Discharge Permit This plan represents the administrative
management practice employed by the owners to provide Stormwater Pollution
Protection means and methods A rain gauge and copy of this SPPP along with the mine
plan and the inspection and sampling forms are required to be maintained at the site

MINE PERMIT il16 23
APPLICATION SETS BUFFERS AND
OWNER SHALL SUBMIT LETTER
OWNER SHALL SUBMIT UPDATEMINE
Managamert
PROPOSED GENERAL DEPTHS AND MEANS
REQUESTINGD MODIFICATION IF BUFFERS OR
MAP WITH MODIFICATION L TR
AND MtASWES
OPERATIONS CHANGE
Mamfam copy afhbne permit mx*xh ag
Assure operators maintain the ^aWmW buffers
approved erd=rr and sediment control
with no disturbance and they are prepared for spry
measures note documents in SPPP
prevention and protection
OWNER SHALL. SUBMIT ANNUAL
BOND ESTABLISHED MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
Reporting
RECLAMATION REPORT BY
OIS7URBEDAREA ALLOWED
FEB 1 EACH YR
Inspectione
Weekly Inspection of r mwon & Sedimanr
lnspect foluwmrg eny ram evenl Pmd,cV 1 5
Record Inspectans on Form in SWPPP
check for erosion of banks and at 015C4arge
Control SInxiure5
inches Of ramfal ana or discharge frcrn basin
and any fret Storrnwaler discharges
NPDES GENERAL DISCHARGE PERMIT 9 NCG02 0646
Management
Submit Operations and Mondonng Plan for
Develop and Implement Stormwater PoCuoan
Notify State 11modiliicabons of operations and
Stale Approval
Prevention Plan Review and Update annualfy
or SWPPP occur
Insta6 Ram Guage and keep copy of mine map
Tram Parsonel and Assign Inspections and
Assure 6mley sampling of required analyticaf
and SWPPP on site
Monitoring requirements
and qualdalrve sampmp
A rain" gauge and monitoring records are to be
kept on $46
RdCotd and Report any exceedanCil of
Prove mmbaf and annual ce4d1oation that the
siarmwaler desc'harges on stale farm Submit copy
Record and Report semi-annual storm, water
Reporting
stonmvaterouMill has been evaluated for
of report on Benchmark stormwaler DMR to
discharges on stale farm Suormf 2.wned
presence of non stormwater discharges see
Regional Uffitle within 30 day of test results Also
copies of annual summary DMR form to
section a 3 of SPPP
include an evaluationlexplanatlon of cause for
Central Of a by March I of each year
laded test
Record and Report any exceedance of
Perform and record Quakfalrre Monitoring nn
Mnuanuaa
stonnxatef discharges ort state form Submd copy
Record and Report Quarterly waalewaler (wet
le forms
the SDO stale terms dwnag a#
of report on Benchmark Wastewater DMR to
pond overflow) an slate form Subms 2 sgned
storm a er sae Ms ouron nfronv mr
Reg=af Office wdim a 30 day of rest resu.7s Also
copes of arwual summary DMR form fo
lnnWe an evahrabodexpbnabon of cause for
ContrdlCbTx* by Alarrh f of each year
faded test
Report to the local OWQ Regional Ofhce within
The pli mdtee must pay the admmratenV and
24 hours a6 signiricahf oPOs see section 5 2
compbance monitoring tee within 30 days affef
Doing bNed by the Division
Document Routine Inspection maintain records
Pe00MI weaMyinspection of water quality beset
Perform annual inspection at iho facAt/es to
dlapactlona
on site include in SPPP
and fodaw+rTg stormevents which result ih
evaluate performace of AMP s
discharge
ldOrt�Cl111g
Perform Quarterly Grab samplers of wastewater
Fecal Cobferm PH SS TSS Turbidity Estimated
2 of these quarLW test can be included with
discharges
ToW Flow
Sem:dnua. Vofmwater lest
Perform Semianuafgiab samples of
SS TSS Turtmdity estimated total Wow total
Nate above add PH and Fecal to lheso Nsf for
stormwaler rJu obtain start at storm
mrntal and event duration
two of the four quarters at waslawaler testing
Jay Dec
eventntJanduna 8 Juty

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
W
Description Page Number
Executive Summary
0
Mine & Dewater Permitting, Management, Reporting & Monitoring
0
1
Introduction
1
2
Contact Information
1
3
Site Description
2
3 1
Facility Information
2
32
Narrative Site Description
2
33
Site Map with Old Topography
4
34
Description of Receiving Waters
4
35
Precipitation Information
5
36
Inventory of Exposed Materials and Potential Pollutant Sources
5
37
Inventory of Past Spills and Leaks
6
4
Non-Stormwater Discharges
7
4 1
Authorized Non-Stormwater Discharge%
7
42
Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharge%
7
5
BMP Identification
8
5 I
Source Protection BMPs
8
5 1 1
Area Specific BMPs
8
52
Spill Response
8
53
Sequence of Major Soil Disturbing Activities
9
54
Sediment and Erosion Control
9
55
Structural BMP
12
6
BMP Implementation
13
6 1
Routine Inspections
13
62
Employee Training
13
7
Monitoring Requirements
14
7 l
Site Inspections
17
8
General SPPP Requirements
18
8 1
Record Keeping and Reporting
18
82
Maintaining the Updated SPPP
18
83
Certification
18
9
Summary of SPPP Updates Chart
19
Appendix A
Routine Facility Inspections Form & Storm Event Data Form
Appendix B
Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation with Annual Report Form,
Structural BMP Report Form & Annual Certification Form
Appendix C
Employee Training Records Form
Appendix D
Analytical Monitoring Reports & State Forms Copies of Completed Test
Reports, General Certification for Submission of Data, Annual Summary DMR —
Wastewater, Annual Summary DMR-Stormwater, Limit Violation DMR-
Wastewater, Limit Violation DMR- Stormwater, SDO Qualitative Monitoring
Appendix E
USGS Map & Aerial map with site shown including SDO##I
Appendix F
Erosion & Sediment Control & Stormwater Calculations with Flow Data
Appendix G
Copy of Current Mine Plan with required DWQ information

1 Introduction
This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) covers the operations at the Bogue
Pit It has been developed as required under the Nationwide Stormwater & Mine
Dewatering General Permit NCG020000, with Certificate of Coverage number COC
NCG020845 Stormwater and wastewater discharges associated with non-metallic
minerals This SPPP describes this facility and its operations, develops an inventory of
potential pollutant sources, identifies controls and best management practices (BMP's)
for reducing the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff, and outlines measures for
implementing and reviewing this plan
2 Contact Information
Contact Charles R Williford Office Phone [phone]
Title Owner/ Manager Email williforcinck@yahoo com
Responsibilities Direct and control operations, assign responsible parties to perform
mining operations, including monitoring, training and administration of Mine Operations
Plan and Stormwater Pollution Plan
Contact Earl Boyd Office 252-393-2504
Title Vice President Operations
Responsibilities Oversee mine operations and personnel and administration of Storm
Water Pollution Plan
Contact William Page Office Phone [phone]
Title Owner / Operator
Responsibilities Oversee mine operations, train personnel and administer Mine
Operations and Stormwater Pollution Plan

3
31
Site Description
Facility information
Facility Name Bogue Pit — S& P Sand and Gravel Inc
Descriptive Location Access dirt drive is located on the North side of the East end of
Bogue Loop Road about 200 feet from intersection of Hwy 24, 3 miles east of Cape
Carteret in Carteret County NC
Street Address NA
City Newport
State NC
Latitude 34 deg, 42 m, 38 664 s
Township Carteret County
Zip 28570
Longitude -77 deg, 00 min, 21 276 s
Discharge Point UT East reach of Sanders Creek (Goose Cr ) , White Oak River Basin
Phone (252) - 393 - 2504 Fax (252) - 393 - 7070
3 2 Narrative Site Description
The 24 34 acre site is orientated in a North —South direction with a rectangular
configuration, approximately 600 feet in width and 1770 feet in length The North and
West Sides of the property are defined by old forest roads with the East side being large
residential lots and the South side bordering an Unnamed Tributary of Sanders Creek by
the state department and labeled Mill Pond Branch on a 1984 survey map stamped by
Arthur R Denning filed with the Carteret County Register of Deeds It should be noted
that copies of this property survey have been used as the "mine map" in acquiring the
original and initial mining permit The Mine Map was revised February 2014 following
this report The pit consist of three different land parcels, parcel 1 being most of the pit,
parcel 2 being a large triangular section right of entrance including southern border and the
3 track being a small triangular section generally at the only outfall of the pond in the
lower Southeast corner
Sunland produced a map on or about May of 2013 to meet the criteria for requesting a
dewatering permit from NCDENR which was received in September of 2013 A copy of
the most current (2014) mine map shall be kept with this plan, see Appendix of this report
S& P Sand and Gravel (Sunland & Page,S&P) took over ownership and operations of the
pit in November of 2006 following years of excavation by the previous owners with the pit
named the Russell Mine Actual topography had not been surveyed therefore the mine
P)

plan shows the original topo In general, the site topography showed the site to have a I %
slope from the high elevation of 30 in the upper Northeast corner of the property sloping
down to the lower Southwest comer to about elevation 10 with the creek along the entire
Southern boundary Flood maps show the 100yr base flood elevation of 8 0 for the UT of
Sanders Creek Elevation 8 0 is also our estimate of the seasonal high groundwater level
for the site based solely on general observations of the typical water level in the wet
detention basin knowing the invert of the rock weir at the discharge channel is elevation
8 36 feet with a top of bank at elevation 10 50 feet In general, past excavations were
linear along the long side of the rectangular property leaving two large knolls within the
pit, creating a long wet detention pond along the eastern side of the mined sands whereby
overflows of rainwater and intercepted shallow groundwater discharge across a rock weir
at the Southeast end of the pond flowing through an old man made channel roughly 14 feet
wide, two feet deep and about two hundred teet till it intersects with Sanders Creek The
original channel as sketched by a state inspector was about 200 feet long with three sets of
rock weirs which formed two in -serves sediment traps It is not clear without additional
survey and exploration to know if the third weir simply was overgrown with weeds and
such whereby the final sediment trap area filled creating a new drainage course for the
pond discharge See other sections of this SPPP for additional information on sediment
and erosion control including stormwater best management practices for water quality
protection and associated calculations in the Appendix See also the Mime Operations
Plan for additional information on the operations of the pit such as affected area,
buffers and reclamation plans
Mine owners are required to maintain bonds on the property to assure that all disturbed
areas are fully reclaimed (graded and planted) to limit the environmental impacts to the
surrounding area, this includes grading to prevent or remove small trapped pools of
stagnate or obnoxious water pools The cost of the bond is directly related to the amount
of acreage the owner intends on and is allowed to mine or disturb, which is called the
affected area In 2007, S& P paid for an affected area of up to 22 67 acres S & P also had
to add to the mine area since the state includes the haul road to the site which is off the
actual property therefore, the permitted acreage was increased to 26 12 acres The offsite
haul road is about 0 64 acres which would theoretically leave about 25 48 acres for the pit,
yet it is only 24 34
It is very important to note that the bond and mine permit do not override any and all other
legal requirements such as land planning ordinance, water quality and wetlands or any
other rules and regulations Specifically, the mining laws also require strict adherence
to buffers both for adjoining properties, wetlands and streams Mine owners state
what buffers they intend on conforming to The original mine owners stated they would
maintain a 50 foot buffer between adjoining properties and a 200 foot buffer along the
southern boundary (mill pond branch i sanders creek) and any disturbed area In general,
by most standards the minimum buffer between adjacent properties would be 25 feet and at
least 50 feet to wetlands, streams or other High Quality Waters if the affected or disturbed
area does not match the stated buffers the owners are in violation of their permit The pit
discharge and Sanders Creek appear to have meandered from the old property survey and
wetland Species appear to have encroached towards the Southern containment berm due to
3

the exfiltration of stormwater within the wet detention basin therefore state inspectors are
claiming the pit is not being operated in accordance with the mine permit At this time,
which is January of 2014 the owners are preparing the performing the surveying and
wetlands mapping and paperwork necessary to modify the buffers to meet minimum
allowable state standards This SPPP should be modified and specifically address what is
allowed following the proposed revisions to the mine permit The state requires mine
owners to clearly identify the buffers in the field to assure no disturbance of them The
state preters markers at about 100 foot intervals to aid mine operators of the need to protect
the required vegetated and undisturbed buffers The property lines have been flagged and
marked at this time to allow for visual determinations for maintaining the buffers
The current owners propose to mine the pit for borrow with no point discharges to be
constructed either within or out of the pit, with the exception of the existing outlet in the
southeast corner of the site associated with the wet detention basin
3 3 Site Map with Old Topography
See Appendix for Mine Plan which shows the property lines, proposed / required buffers
which shall not be disturbed, all surface water bodies along with base flood levels, erosion
and stormwater best management practices (bmps) and areas which have been reclaimed
Original topography was transferred to this plan See copy of old topographic map with
project area delineated in the Appendix section of this report
3 4 Description of Receiving Waters
Receiving Water Name Unnamed Tributary Sanders Creek (AU # 20-36-4-1)
Discharge Points flowing to this receiving water Main and Only mine outfall
Location and description of any discharge associated with Mining or site activity
Direct rainfall and intercepted shallow groundwater discharges across Rock Rip Rap
Weir, southeast corner of pit area as shown on plan in Appendix of this Report
Impaired Status 2002 303(d) list — Category 5, Loss of Use- Shellfish Harvesting due
to Bacteria
Receiving Water Name Goose Creek & Bogue Sound
Discharge Points flowing to this receiving water Sanders Creek
Impaired Statics 2002 303(d) list — Category 5, Loss of Use Shellfish Harvesting
Sanders and Goose Creek are classified as SA waters Tidal salt waters used for
commercial fishing and marketing and are also protected for other uses cover by SB and SC
classifications All SA waters are also High Quality Waters (HQW)
4

3 5 Precipitation Information
The site is located in Carteret County, NC The counties annual rainfall is 56 inches The
climate is considered humid subtropical The warmest month is July and coldest is
January The average monthly precipitation is between a low of 3 23 inches to a high of
4 64 inches The wettest months occur in July and September and the dryer months are
February and October Extreme weather does affect the coast with excessive intense
rainfalls and or extended durations of daily light precipitation
In general most of the soils are Kureb sands with a general density of about 114 pounds per
cubic foot with optimum moisture content around 14% Which have a Unified
classification of SP, SP-SM and an AASHTO classification of A-3 Most of our material
is used as fill for building or other site development projects whereby the client prefers the
moisture to be near optimum for placement and compaction Therefore, if the soils are wet
from rainfall we tend to wait a day or so until the exce,,sively well drained sands and sandy
loam soils are more suitable for construction purposes
Our haul roads are dirt and therefore heavy intense summer storms or long excessive rains
can soften the roadway leading down into the lower area of the pit Erosion of the roadway
and mine side slopes is minimal due to the great infiltration rate
Since the site lies within one-half mile and drains to SA waters, the state considers the first
flush of stormwater runoff to be that produced from 1 5 inches of rainfall on the site This
volume is called the water quality volume and is considered that which has the potential to
contain the most pollutants according to State Coastal Stormwater Rules and Regulations
3 6 Inventory of Exposed Materials and Potential Pollutant Sources
The finished product is the raw materials since we do not process them in any manner
There are no buildings, sanitary sewage facilities, chemicals or any other stored pollutants
on site Typically our excavator is left on site and an operator arrives whereby he
excavates directly from an exposed bank or ground level depositing directly into a dump
truck The pit is three minutes from our office building on Hwy 24, therefore restroom
facilities and or management support is readily available
When fuel is needed the excavator is driven up to the pit entrance and loaded directly from
an approved commercial fuel truck This limits the potential far a fuel spill to be released
into our wet detention basin The only potential pollutant sources are from sediment
washing from the site and or potentially a minor break in a hydraulic hose We maintain a
spill containment kit on the excavator The kit contains a 5 quart plastic pan along with
sand bags and labels, whereby the spill is contained and removed in the sand bags which
are disposed through an approved waste management company
5

3 7 inventory of Past Spills and Leaks
Instructions to the table below record any spills or chronic leaks that have occurred on -
site for three years pnor to this permit Also record any leaks which occur in the future
Map
Date
Nature of Spill
Discharge
Key
Material 1 Cause of
Spill
Action Taken
Quantity
Point
NA
09 13
No Known Spills
#1
0

4 Non-Stormwater Discharges
4 1 Authorized Non-Stormwater Discharges
Instructions List all miscellaneous non-stormwater discharges authorized pursuant to
this permit, and any other non-stormwater discharges that may occur List BMPs used to
minimize impacts of these discharges
Description of Discharge
Amount
a rox
Frequency
BMPs
There are no authorized Non-
Stormwater discharges as dust control
is consider incidental and no
processing of materials on site
4 2 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges
The discharge permit may be authorized for certain miscellaneous non-Stormwater
discharge% if those discharges are not significant contributors of pollutants Such
discharges may include waters used to wash vehicles where detergents are not used, water
used to control dust, uncontaminated ground water or spring water Non-Stormwater
discharges that are significant contributors of pollutants shall be eliminated or authorized
under a separate permit Although fire -fighting drainage may contain significant pollutant
concentrations, the frequency of occurrence is low and the discharge is hereby authorized
out of necessity
7

5 BMP Identification
5 1 Source Protection BMPS
• Preventative Maintenance All stormwater management devices and facility
equipment should be inspected and receive maintenance on a regular basis to prevent
system failures and reduced performance that could cause contamination of
stormwater
• Spill Prevention and Response Reduce the risk of pollutant release by developing
material handling procedures, inspecting and maintaining containers and tanks, and
secondary containment of material storage Proper Spill response measures include
having emergency spill kits available where materials are commonly handled and
training material handlers in spill response procedures
0 1 1 Area SpeCtTIC t5MVS
Instructions For each significant area identified in section 3 4 of this SPPP, develop a
list of BMPs based on the activities and pollutants found there using the following table
5 1 1 1 Exaosed Cut Banks & Stockpiles
BMP
Implementation
Date
Responsible
Part
Wet Detention Basin
2008
Operators
5 1 12 Potential Soills & Float►na Debns
BMP
Implementation
Date
Responsible
Part
Type 1 Turbidity Curtain
2014
Owners
5 2 Spill Response
Note, a spill kit is kept with the operators on the excavator, should fuel or fluids leak onto
ground then the operator shall use the 5 quart pan to contain the fluids and use the
sandbags to collect the contaminated soil The contaminated soil should be processed
through a regulated waste hauler and or acceptable land disposal facility
3

The permittee and or operators shall report to the local DWQ regional office (910-796-
7215) within 24 hours all significant spills as defined in Part V1I of the discharge permit,
additionally they shall report spills including any oil spill of 25 gallons or more, any spill
regardless of amount that causes a sheen on the surface waters or occurs within 100 feet
of Sanders Creek or any spill of 25 gallons or less which cannot be cleaned up in 24
hours
5 3 Sequence of Major Soil Disturbing Activities
The mine has been active for more than 15 years In general the majority of the site has
been excavated to some degree with the exception of the lower Southern area adjacent to
the creek and the North and East sides In general the pit area is similar to a "C" with the
main excavation area separated from a large wet detention basin by use of an existing
exposed cut bank or protective berm, about eight to fifteen feet high The cut bank
serves as a barrier to direct runoff into the wet basin from mine activities Stormwater
runoff flows both North and South from the interior excavated areas before reaching the
water level which wraps around the protective cut bank generally at the terminus and
outside edge of the "C" The active cut banks are typically at about a I 1 or 2 1 slope,
the exterior of the protective berm and other areas near the buffer vary in slope but
roughly 3 1 with some areas a bit steeper However all reclaimed areas shall be graded to
roughly a 3 l - 2 5 1 slope which is typically stable with the sandy loam and manne
terrace soils
If additional allowable area is mined, then the topsoil is stockpiled for reuse after trees
and other vegetation are removed The trees and other vegetation are typically burned or
burred with at least four feet of cover and above any know water table which is assumed
to be about at elevation 8 0 for the seasonal high level It should be noted that the
Southern berm appears to have been constructed by laying cut trees down on the existing
ground (elev +- 9) then covering them with fill, therefore the containment berm allows
exfiltration to the downstream area which enhances wetland growth and sustainability
5 4 Sediment and Erosion Control
Mines must be operated in accordance with NC State Administrative Code Title 15A,
Chapter 5 which in general enforces the requirements of the Mining Act of 1971 State
rules for the control of sediment apply to any transport of sediment off site Histoncal
records at the state office report that the previous owners of the pit began excavations
below the existing grade at the lower (Southern) end of the Site They dug a discharge
channel about 200 feet and roughly 14 feet wide and approximately 3 feet deep The
records indicate the placement of three rock weirs apparently to form two in series
sediment traps Two of the rock weirs are present today, one at the head of the discharge
channel and another about 86 feet downstream The third weir is not apparent however it
is noted that Sanders Creek is somewhat choked with falling timber and other swamp
debris and a beaver dam which causes backwater behind the existing weirs thereby
affecting the control of discharge from the existing wet detention basin The traps did
LZ'

not include internal bamers and none exist Currently the channel is basically about 8-14
feet wide with about 2 feet of depth with well vegetated sides and a relatively flat sandy
bottom, there is little to no apparent erosion of the discharge channel even though
excessive rainfalls from extreme weather have occurred during the current management
According to Chapter 6 of the State's Practice Standards and Specifications for Sediment
and Erosion Control Practices sediment traps, basins and other controlling elements
should be sized based on the total area draining to the element Our site is 24 34 acres
with approximately 2105 acres draining to the existing outlet Sediment traps similar to
what was constructed are only effective for drainage areas of 5 acres or less
Consequently by the standards a Sediment Basin would be the only burp recommended
for our drainage area Sediment basins are generally assumed to only be effective for
about 3 years, if longer use is expected the standard-, state the basin should be designed as
a permanent structure generally in accordance with other standards such as the states
stormwater management structures and or dams should the height of the embankment
exceed 25 feet or the volume of the impoundment exceed 50 acre-feet
Given the above state standards the existing ponded water at the site classifies more as a
Wet Detention Basin BMP by State Stormwater standards, and the current owners use
this basin as a water quality basin which also serves as the primary sediment and erosion
control structure The existing rock weir is the only means of structural controls versus
riser / barrel and intake orifices and or skimmers Sediment Basins are generally
considered effective at trapping and settling sediment it the surface areas to volume
requirements are met State stormwater rules give regulatory credits for Wet Detention
Basins if designed and maintained in accordance with the stormwater standards The key
elements for effectiveness of Wet Detention Basins is also the surface area to volume
relationship along with numerous elements regarding the capturing of a required amount
of runoff given the regional location of the facility along with the controlled release of
the stormwater runoff over a 2-5 day periord A pollutant removal credit of about 85% of
the total suspended solids is provided by Wet Detention Basins and generally about 70%
removal for Sediment Basins and Traps
A review of the existing basin elements against the primary Sediment Basin and Wet
Detention Stormwater Basin standards are provided below Relative calculations
including the states checklist for wet ponds are included in the Appendix of this SPPP
Given Drainage Area 2105 ac, Given Acres Disturbed 14 04 ac
SEDIMENT BASIN Ex WET DETENTION BASIN
Min Sed Storage 1800 cf per disturbed acre
Min Stara a 25,272 cf Storage Provided 1,073,042 cf
Q10=4502cfs
Min Surface Area 435 sf / 1 cfs Q10 Surface area varies elev 7 5-9 8
Min Surface Area 19,584 sf, 0 45 ac Min Surface Area Provide 3 0 ac
Baffles Required 3 _ Baffles Provided 0
Min Depth 2 feet Averse Depth 4 10 feet
Min LJW Ratio 2 1, Max 6.1 LlW varies 6 1 — 18 1

WET DETENTION BASIN
Coastal Region use Table 104, 90%TSS since no planted vegetative shelf
Given impervious area <10%, avg depth 4 10' by option I
Reg Surface Area / Drainage Area Ratio 0 80 Ratio Provided 29 0-26 0
Prevent Short Circutting forbays, berms Provide Berms & turbidity curtain
A comparison of the existing wet detention pond shows that the large surface area of the
pond along with its large volume greatly exceeds the minimum required storage and
surface areas for both sediment and wet detention basins The length to width ratios are
greatly exceeded which may imply a stagnation of the stored runoff The large surface
area also results in very Small driving head over the existing controlling weir resulting in
longer than desired retention of the required minimum storage volumes, however the
relationship also results in less of a peak flow discharge than pre construction for the one
year twenty four hour storm
The only week part of the existing pond is the potential for short circuiting of any
potential spill of hazardous materials and or a strong wave should a main separation berm
fall directly Into the narrower portion of the pond For these reasons and as a
recommendation of this SPPP the owners have purchased and plan to install a floating
turbidity curtain The curtain will be a type one impenetrable five foot deep by one
hundred foot long wall placed in a circular shape in front of the existing outlet control
structure which is a rock weir The installers should assure that there is at least a foot of
clear space between the pond bottom and the bottom of the curtain to allow for discharge
from the pond
In general the pond is relatively shallow with a calculated depth of about four feet using
option I in the state stormwater bmp manual In the dry seasons the water level can vary
quite a bit and portions of the upper (North) end of the pond bottom can be Seen
Typically, the water does appear greenish in tint most likely due to algae formed by
sunlight penetration and the high organic content of the shallow concentrated flow
intercepted by the pit which is common to our coastal plains Algae is not a bad thing yet
it its population is too large it can affect fish and rapid die off can lead to high organic
waste which may affect bacteria and oxygen levels in the receiving creels and
downstream watercourses
Since the surface and drainage area of the pond and site are not that variable the best
means of reducing the amount of algae is either through planting of floating plants to
block the sunlight penetration or perform wet dredging to deepen the pond depth to at
least ten feet leaving a littoral shelf along the bank The deeper depth should reduce the
development of algae and the shelf could be planted during reclamation activities to
induce habitat and greater uptake of the nutrients in the runoff
In summary the existing pond is serving to capture and treat the sediment from the pit
along with providing attenuation of peak flows from the watershed The total discharge
from the pit closely follows the preconstruction runoff flows since the pre Rational

coefficient is 0 25 and the post is only 0 30 It is also apparent from visual observation',
that the stored water within the pit tends to exfiltrate allowing for promotion of wetland
habitat and a more stable minimum base flow to the down slope Sanders Creek The
water quality of the pond would most likely be improved if the pond depth was deepened
and or the addition of floating pond plants to block the sunlight and stabilize its
temperature
The outlet and Southern Containment berm should be inspected routinely for possible
signs of breaching (leaking) in the embankment or undercutting of the discharge channel
5 5 Structural BMPs
All of the site drainage is directed to the large Wet Detention Basin which has a rock weir
located in the Southeast corner of the pond It has and will be maintained for both
Sediment and erosion control along with protection of surface water quality
Structure Wet Detention Basin
Date of Implementation 2008
Disci Arge Point Southeast Corner of Pond — SDO #1
Area(s) Treated All disturbed and total affected area of Mine
Pollutants Removed 90% Total Suspended Solids -- Using Table 10-4
25% Total Nitrogen
40% Total Phosphorus
And provides attenuation of Peak Runotf
Maintenance Requirement(s) See discharge permit for sample times
Quarterly analytical & qualitative sampling 2x year during storm event
Minimum inspection lea 7day & 24 hrs after storm producing discharge
Frequency
See Other
Sections
Of this
report
12

6 BMP Implementation
6 1 Routine Inspections
Inspection of all BMPs should be performed to ascertain that they are in proper operating
condition Facility inspections will be performed every week by a trained operator who
will record the inspection on the general form found at the site It stormwater BMPs are
Found to be functioning incorrectly, maintenance will be performed before the next
anticipated storm event, or as necessary to maintain effectiveness of the stormwater
controls A sample inspection form and records of past inspections will be kept in the
Appendix of this SPPP
6 2 Employee Training
Topics to be included in employee training
• Introduce Pollution Prevention Team and discuss need for the SPPP
• Spill response procedures, notifications and proper recording
+ Review of past spills, see form in Appendix
+ Review of good housekeeping procedures
+ Proper material handling procedures
• Proper disposal or recycling of material%
• Be sure employees know where cleaning materials and spill kits are located
• Review sources of stormwater pollutants used onsite
• Familiarize employees with inspections, testing and recording procedures
All pit employees will attend a training session every year New pit employees will be
trained within three months of hiring in order to perform required inspections and be
familiar with this SPPP Records of attendance may be kept with this SPPP using the
form provided in the Appendix of this report
13

7 Monitoring Requirements
Ultimately, the goal of this SPPP is to protect the quality of water resources The receiving
creek is Sanders Creek which is a High Quality Water, it is classified as SA for shellfish
harvesting To evaluate the effectiveness of the measure% described here, the following
monitonng activities will be conducted on the stormwater discharges at the Bogue Pit
Monitoring results will be used to regularly reassess the impact of pollutant sources and the
need for best management practices (BMPs) The SPPP will be updated and improved
throughout the term of the permit and these updates will be informed by the results of
monitoring
Inspections and testing of the water quality is required by the General Stormwater Discharge
Permit State forms must be completed at the time of sampling and upon receipt of test
results See Appendix for required forms and a completed chain of custody for labs
Note This mine does not generate wastewater which is not covered by the mine and
dewater permits therefore Authonzation To Construct or expand the existing wastewater
facilities is not required The wastewater allowed and covered under the discharge permit
includes the discharge associated with dust control, stormwater runoff and the interception
of shallow groundwater into the erosion & sediment control & stormwater Wet Detention
Basin on site Should operations change to include moditying the processes such as adding
the process of washing the mined sands and gravels and or adding vehicle maintenance in
the yard and or pumping of the basin, then the owners would need to send a letter to the state
for review of the proposed additional wastewater discharges
Stormwater Analytical Monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with the General
Discharge Permit The analytical monitoring must occur during a representative storm event
(>0 I inches of rainfall & > 48 hrs from last storm) twice per year within specified time
frames I" time frame is January 1-June 30`h, 2°`i time frame is July I -December 31) A
minimum of 60 days must be provided between required Semi-annual testing Failure to
perform the semi-annual monitoring for any six month period of time immediately triggers
monthly monitoring
Grab Samples shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge at the Stormwater
discharge outfall #1 (SDO), which is Just downstream of the existing rock weir in the
southwest corner of the wet detention basin Note it is recommended that turbidity be
monitored directly upstream and downstream at the point of intersection with the receiving
stream versus at the rock weir due to the nature of the watershed The total precipitation for
the whole rainfall event must be recorded using the onsite rain gauge and total flow either
measured continuously or calculated based on area of flow or estimated by the measurement
of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event when the semiannual testing is
required
Note the total flow can be estimated using the discharge chart provided in the Appendix of
this report, measure the depth in inches of flow over the weir and obtain flow from chart
reporting in Millions of Gallons per day Record the time the rainfall starts and stop-, for the
14

storm event when the required samples are taken Estimate the total discharge gallons by
comparing the duration to the full daily discharges shown in the table in the Appendix As
an example the chart shows a head of 1 2 inches over the weir equaling 0 25 MGD if
rainfall only 4 hours out of day and flow 1 2 inch over weir in 20 minute intervals, then the
estimated ponds storm discharge in Million Gallons would be 4/24 = 0 17 Therefore
0 17x0 25 MG would equal 0 04 MG for the total flow, record this number on the storm
event chart and transfer to the proper state form for submission annually by March 1 or
within 30 days of failing a benchmark limit
STORMWATER ANALYTICAL TESTING DURRING FIRST 30 MIN RAINFALL
Discharge
Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
Settleable Solids
ml/l
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended
Solids
mg/1
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Turbidity
NTU
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO,or UorD
Total Rainfall
inches
Semi-annual
I ----
I -----
Event Duration
minutes
Semi-annual
Estimate
I ----
Total Flow
MG
Semi-annual
Estimate
I SDO
The results of the test must be reported to the state see forms in Appendix The results shall
be compared to the benchmark values Exceedence of benchmark values requires the
permittee to increase monitoring, management activities and numerous other potential
requirements as directed in the permit and following directives by the reviewing parties
Note caution should be used when reporting both fecal coliform and turbidity since it is
likely that the receiving stream exceeds the benchmarks since it iS impaired for loss of use as
a shellfish growing area since 2002 primarily due to bacteria
BENCHMARK VALUES FOR STORMWATER DISHCARGES
Settleable Solids 0 10 mg/I
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 50 mg/l
Turbidity 50 mg/1
If results fail the above levels then follow Tier One/Two criteria as described starting
on page 7 of 16 in the General Stormwater Discharge Permit And submit results of
testing to DENR within 30 days of receiving failed test See end of this section for
address and instructions on state forms
Stormwater Qualitative Monitoring of stormwater outfall must be performed during a
representative storm semi-annually while obtaining test These records must be
maintained on site and as part of this SPPP but are not required to be reported to the
state Perform when obtaining semi-annual analytical sampling to aid in evaluation of
results and performance of the stormwater bmp
X

Qualitative monitoring requires a visual inspection and reporting for the discharge directly at
the stormwater outfall See States required SDO reporting forms in Appendix of this report
Note the following characteristics Color, Odor, Clarity, Floating Solids, Foam, Oil Sheen,
erosion or deposits immediately downstream of rock weir and or any other obvious
indicators of stormwater pollution
Note the general discharge permit only applies to direct runoff from stormwater and or
intercepted groundwater, it does not include any activity which may affect the water quality
of the receiving water and or adjacent wetlands, such as lowering the water level in the pond
either by pumping or dredging without securing a "Pumping Operation and Monitoring
Plan" approved by NCDENR
Analytical Wastewater Discharges (includes stormwater runoff and groundwater) The
Bogue Pit does not have process wastewater since we do not process the mined sand and
gravels and there are no offices or on site sanitary wastewater facilities However Wet pond
overflows are classified as wastewater even if only from stormwater runoff and
groundwater The current wet detention pond has a free flow condition whereby the rock
weir size and surface water size cause the stormwater to be captured, treated and slowly
released it is not a designed structural device sized to fully capture and treat the stormwater
runoff in excess from the 10yr 24 hr storm (6 87 inches) then analytical wastewater
sampling is required Quarterly Note that analytical storm water testing is required
semi-annual therefore two of the four quarterly tests can be conducted during the
stormwater testing Also note that if the pond was designed to capture and treat the runoff
from a 25 yr storm with no discharge than analytical stormwater testing would also be
exempt The large wet detention pond does capture and treat the stormwater so the owners
should work with DENR to qualify the capacity of the existing pond and outfall structures
Quarterly Grab Sampling of Effluent at SDO #1
Discharge
Characteristics
Units
Time Frames
for each
quarter
Effluent
Monthly Avg
Limitations
Daily
Maximum
Ph
Standard
Jan — March
-----
6 0-9 0
Settleable Solids
nil/I
Aril -June
01
02
Total Suspended
Solids
mg1l
July -Sept
20 (10 if not
impaired)
45
Turbidity
NTU
Oct -Dec
< 50
50
Fecal Coliform
col/ml
----
------
Total Flow
MG
50% of 7Q10
Note perform ph and fecal during required storm testing 2 quarters out of the year,
caution 8 hour maximum hold time on fecal, 48 hrs on all other test
NOTE Record results of all test on the Annual Summary Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) form 2 signed copies of the Annual stormwater and wastewater DMR
reports must be submitted to the Division's Central Office by March 1 of each year
Also note that any samples which exceed the stormwater benchmark or wastewater

effluent limits shall be submitted to the Division Regional office no later than 30 days
from date receiving lab results Also record the qualitative observations on the SDO
Qualitative Monitoring Form and retain on site See forms in the Appendix
Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919-807-6300
Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405
90 l-796-7215
It is important to note that the receiving creek has been impaired due to bacteria
therefore it is likely that the shallow intercepted groundwater passing through the
basin will contain higher than targeted levels of bacteria, this is inherent in the
watershed not a result of operations However should waterfowl occupy the basin then
fecal levels could elevate above the initial testing conducted, caution should be exercised
over the state implementing monthly tier l and tier 2 testing solely on ph and or bacteria
The ph is relative to the watershed and mineral content of the soils Comparing results
between quarters and between stormwater runoff events is important to estimate the
performance of the Wet Detention Basin The color or turbidity is also inherent to the
watershed so testing of turbidity should be done just upstream and downstream of our
discharges intersection with Sanders Creek at the Creeks turbidity is obviously worse than
the clear water exiting the stormwater bmp
Note if outlet controlling structures are designed and installed to retain the runoff from
the 25yr storms and the direct runoff from the 10yr — 24 hr storms than the state may
waive all testing since considered a zero discharge facility
The certified lab we are contracted with is Lab # 94, Environmental Chemists, Inc ,
6602 Widmill Way, Wilmington NC 28405, office phone [phone], fax 910-392-
4424 In general we should retain the sampling bottles (4-5) here at the office and prepare
to pack all obtained samples in ice within the labs labeled cooler Complete the Chain of
Custody Report and place in sealed bag within cooler There are very specific and critical
maximum hold times on the samples which determine the timing and pick up of them Most
of the water quality parameters have more than a 24 hr hold time with the exception of fecal
coliform which is only an 8 hr window from obtaining samples to processing in the lab The
lab typically makes three trips a week to this area for others testing therefore we must
coordinate with them in advance to perform the fecal cohlorm test
Recall we have to actual sample twice a year during a rain event for SS, TSS and Turbidity
We have to sample quarterly for the same parameters and add ph and fecal coliform It is
acceptable to the state to combine two quarters of the sampling with those obtained from the
rainfall events, however note this most likely will result in obtaining the rain sample and
holding off on the fecal till just before sample being pick up due to 8 hr hold requirement
17

7 1 Site Inspections
All facility areas contributing to a stormwater discharge authorized by this perrrut shall be
inspected An annual report summarizing the scope of the inspection, name(s) and
qualifications of personnel making the inspection, the date(s) of the inspection, and major
observations relating to the implementation of the SPPP shall be made and retained as part
of the SWPPP See inspection forms in Appendix and note required write ups following any
failed water quality sampling
A comprehensive site evaluation will be pertormed by a trained and knowledgeable person
The results of the inspection will be documented in a report containing at minimum the
date, the person(s) making the inspection, the scope of the inspection, observations relating
to the discharge of pollutants from the facility, BMPs needing maintenance, BMPs which
failed to operate as designed, locations where additional BMPs are needed corrective
action-, taken, and any updates to the SPPP Copies of past inspection should be kept in the
Appendix of this report
8 General SPPP Requirements
8 1 Record Keeping and Reporting
A copy of this SPPP was submitted as part of the Operations and Monitoring report
required by the Discharge permit The SPPPs shall also be available for inspection at the
project site or operation covered by this permit Records pertaining to inspections,
monitoring, maintenance, employee trainings, compliance evaluations, and spill% will be
kept onsite with the SPPP
8 2 Maintaining the Updated SPPP
A Permtttee must revise the SPPP whenever a change in design, operation, maintenance
procedures, etc occur, that may cause a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters
The SPPP must be amended if inspections indicate a control has been used
inappropriately or incorrectly or the SPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly
reducing pollutants in the discharge The SPPP and control must be updated to identify
and correct any deficiencies noted
8 3 Certification
The following certification is due upon initial submission of the SPPP and at least annually
along with the submission of required monitoring test and or modification of operations
and or BMP's It must be signed by an owner who is responsible for oversight of all
operations and activities The certification assures that the stormwater outfall has been

evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges The owner should include a
paragraph explaining the effectiveness of the erosion and stormwater BMP Certification
and updating of this SPPP are required at a minimum annually A copy of this certification
is required with the submission of all required documents, see copy in Appendix with the
DMR forms
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on
my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the sv> tenz or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information is to the best of my knowledge
and belief, true accurate, and complete 1 am aware that there are significant penalties
for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations
Name (print)
Signature
Title
Date Signed
A copy of this general certification form is provided along with DMR test report
forms, submit this statement with all test results Also see Appendix for
Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation form required as proof of inspections
for non-stormwater discharges Submit annually with any modifications of the plan
and as a requirement for the discharge permit
9 Summary of SPPP Updates.
Keep a record of all changes made to this SPPR using the chart below
Date of Chances Description of Changes
ILI

Routine Facility Inspection Form
(weekly & following rain/discharge event)
Date/Completed
By
Checked for
Problems')
If yes, describe
Corrective Actions to
be Taken
Schedule for
Corrective
Actions
Y
N

Storm Event Data
Information on the storm events sampled may be recorded here Tlus information does not need
to be submitted to the Agency yet the total rainfall, storm event duration and estimated discharge
as a result of the rainfall data is required to be entered on the Annual Summary DMR report for
the reporting of the sera iannual required stormwater samples
Monitoring Period to _
MO/DAY/YEAR MOIDAY/YEAR
Date of Storm Event Type of Monitoring
MO/DAY/YEAR Effluent limitation! Benchmark
Storm Duration Total Precipitation
Hours Inches
Time Since Last Measurable Storm Event
Hours or Days
Monitoring Period to
MO/DAY/YEAR MO/DAYIYEAR
Date of Storm Event Type of Monitoring
MOMAY/YLAR
Storm Duration Total Precipitation
Hours
Time Since Last Measurable Storm Event
Effluent limitation/ Benchmark
Inches
Monitoring Period to
MO/DAY/YEAR MO/DAY/YEAR
Date of Storm Event Type of Monitoring
MOIDAY/YEAR Effluent limitation/ Benchmark
Storm Duration Total Precipitation
Hours Inches
Time Since Last Measurable Storm Event
Hours or Days
Monitoring Period to
MOIDAY/YEAR MOIDA Y/YEAR
Date of Storm Event Type of Monitoring
MO/DAY/YEAR Effluent hmitauon!
Storm Duration
Hours
Time Since Last Measurable Storm Event
Total Precipitation
Of
Inches
Monitoring Period to
MO/DAY/YEAR MOIDAYNEAR
Date of Storm Event Type of Monitoring
MO/DAY/YEAR Effluent limitation/
Storm Duration Total Precipitation
Hours Inches
Time Since Last Measurable Storm Event
Hours or

Appendix B
Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation
Annual Report Form
Structural BMP Report Form
Annual Certification Form

Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation
Annual Compliance Evaluation Report for
BOGUS PIT — S&P SAND & GRAVEL, LLC
Name of Person(s) completing evaluation
Date of evaluation
Weather conditions during inspection
Areas inspected during evaluation
Inspect all exposed areas of the facility for evidence of contamination of runoff Areas that need
to be inspected include all areas identified in the SPPP, areas where spills have or are likely to
occur, all structural and non-structural BMPs Including a review of analytical and qualitative
test data for the evaluation of non stormwater or allowable wastewater discharges

Structural Best Manasement Practices InsDectlOn Form
Structure
is maintenance
needed?
YIN
Does it function as
expected?
YIN
describe the problem
Corrective actions to be
taken
_ Schedule for
completion
SDO #1
Wet
Detention
Basin

Are there any new sources of potential stormwater pollutants not previously identified in
the SPPP`' YES / NO
If you circled yes, how will the SPPP be modified to prevent these sources from
contaminating runoff
Have either visual inspections or monitoring during the past year indicated pollution of
stormwater which have not yet been addressed? YES / NO
If so, describe the potential sources of any pollutants found in runoff
What actions or modifications to the SPPP are needed to prevent these pollutants from
reaching the receiving waters?
Describe any other places where the site inspection indicates noncompliance with the SPPP
and the conditions of the general permit
What other changes to the SPPP are needed to ensure that the site is in compliance?
Certification of Compliance
This Compliance Evaluation Report has been prepared by qualified personnel who
properly gathered and evaluated information submitted for this Report The information in this
Report, to the best of my knowledge, is accurate and complete After inspection of all exposed
industrial areas, BMPs, and stormwater systems, and review of the SPPP and required
monitoring I find that this facility is in compliance with the SPPP and the permit
Name (print) Title
Signature Date

Employee Training Records
Keep a sign in sheet for each employee training session your facility holds and retain them with
this SPPP
SPPP Course Employee Sign -In Sheet
Date " Employee Name Em o to ee Si nature '

Appendix D
Analytical Monitoring Reports & State Forms
Location plan for Required Testing
Copies of Completed Test Reports
General Certification for Submission of Data
Annual Summary DMR — Wastewater
Annual Summary DMR-Stormwater
Limit Violation DMR- Wastewater
Limit Violation DMR- Stormwater
SDO Qualitative Monitoring

La
Oft Cam- tv
V-Low
Lo(,A;Oov\" 'h p—
55 1 i S5
T--t�-s; (� 7
900
2c�
Q
0 _
, VDQ

Certification
The following certification is due upon initial submission of the SWPPP and at least
annually along with the submission of required monitoring test and or modification of
operations and or BMP's It must be signed by an owner who is responsible for oversight
of all operations and activities The certification assures that the stormwater outfall has
been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges The owner should include a
paragraph explaining the effectiveness of the erosion and stormwater BN4P Certification
and updating of this SWPPP are required at a minimum annually
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on
my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, true, accurate, and complete I am aware that there are significant penalties
for submitting false information, including the possibility offine and imprisonment for
knowing violations
Name (print).
Title
Signature Date Signed

I ANNUAL SUMMARY DMR - WASTEWATER I
k"
PROCESS MINE/DEWATERING WASTEWATER
GENERAL PERMIT N4 NCG020000
CERTU ICA rF OF COVERAGE, NO
FACILITY NAME
PFRSON COLLECTING SAMPLES
CERTIFIED LABORATORY Lah #
Lab#.
LIMIT VIOLATIONS? YES ❑ NO ❑
NCG02_
Part A Wastewater Monitoring Requirements
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR
COUNT V
PHONE NO ( )
ADD TO LISTSN RVI 9 YF S ❑ NO[:] EMAIL
INDUSTRIAL SAND"' ❑ DISCHARGING TO SA WATERS4, ❑
OutfallPNo
DateISautp#e
/;"31siRt !
�t1Fe♦tr.�gydrJy�plliF7
Ttitai.F3ow
TotalfS nded
cr
r r�'
Ttttrb[
,tom
�r Y
Settleable lids
} �
H
L,1AW�.} i-F 3
F`Co[><forms
MG
WJLMW,,M
gNTU�
rW
Madaid
ol/@IL
'All mines must monitor W W discharges for TSS Only indusla i it sand nine discharges are subject to TSS Inuits
If an effluent limn is exceeded the permittee is required to institute monthly monitoring for that parameter for the remaining permit term
'The disc.h irgL shall not cause an instantaneous me'isuremt nt of the turbidity of the receiving w itet to exceed 10 NTU for freshwater strc imy lakes and reservoirs
designated as trout waters 25 NTU for all lakes and reservoirs and all salt waters 50 NTU for all other streams and surface waters Turbidity may be morutored at the
Stormwatcr Discharge Outfall Alternatively the permittee may choose to monitor turbidity in the. receiving water directly upstream and downstream of the discharge
4 Only facilities discharging to SA watt is are required to monitor for Fecal colifornis
Permit Date I / 1 /2010-12/31 /2014 Last Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 1 of 2

Part A Canhnued Wastewater Monitorme Requirements
t
Fl�
I };�
y�AEL
� Tote! Sus nded
pew
r Solids
F'��-CUM
� iy
Tttt
�Onr�"
c
s �
�
Y� t � �
�Settleablei.
�
��&y� lEln 5
��rotal
-��
xCollected y pH ,
��" i a 1
'0�
ng/! t�^' `;�
;"+NTiJ�
�.�`�.,.;��
ffStandaxd
rcOVm3s.��.3
k..-..a.,.-.�.._ tl
MAIL ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF THIS ANNUAL SUMMARY (INCLUDING ALL "NO FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE" & LIMIT
VIOLATIONS) BY MARCH 1 OF EACH YEAR TO
Division of Water Quality
Attn DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTHICATION I.OR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED
I certify, under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and hehef, true, accurate, and complete
1 am aware that there are signifi ant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations "
(Signature of Pernuttee)
Permit D Lie 1/1/2010 12/31/2014
(Date)
Last Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 2 of 2

ANNUAL SUMMARY DMR - WASTEWATER I
CN R71F[CATE OF COVERAGE NO
FACILITY NAME
PE RSON COI LEECTING SAMPLES
CERTIFIED LABORATORY
PROCESS MINE/DEWATERING WASTEWATER
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG020000
NCGO2____
LIMIT VIOLArIONS? YES ❑ NO ❑
Part A Wastewater Monitoring its( uirements
Lab #
ah #
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR
COUNT V
PHONE NO ( i
ADD TO LIS fSERVE ) YES ❑ NO[] EMAIL
INDUSTRIAL. SAND' ❑ DISCHARGING TO SA WATERS°? ❑
Iti l� Rl y
`•F� t
r,OatFall NoL.uLlpl�ectedt
��ntJfP
y
��
UateSattnple
llt'b %F �iC•f12 �
s ' 6 J�>
tea,
4
�? ,
TotaliFlow
�h.Y
t ti• •i `ky�r1�-+ r" �+ �+
.' .2r�
Total Suspended
olitist
� t
r•- � sf"r j�'i�lay+
Turbidlly3$r
_
.htK.Si �.l '.,fs'
7 �rY
Settleabtlle So!>tds
�. :a
d
�
pH�
t 'C - x
7 ;v
3 #
Fecal Coli%i nm�s
i All mines must monitor WW discharges for TSS Only industrial sand mine discharges are subject to TSS limits
If an effluent limit is exceeded the pennittee is requited to institute monthly monitoring for that parameter foi the remaining permit term
3 The disch ►rge shall not c iuse an instant ineous me inurement of the turbidity of the mceiving w iter to exceed 10 NTU for freshwater streams lakes and rc.servolrS
designated as trout waters 25 NTU for all lakes and reservoirs end all Salt waters 50 NTU for all other streams and surface waters Turbidity may be monitored at the
Stormnater Discharge Outfall Alternatively the permitice may choose to monitor turbidity in the receiving water directly upstream and downstream of the discharge
° Only facilities discharging to SA waters are required to monitor for Fecal cohforms
Pert -nit Date 1/1/2010-1213112014 List Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 1 of 2

Part A Gouttrrrted Wastewater Mon oring Requirement
Io
r �
,,Outfa No'aic
s�Date Sample
11eCfed t
Total Flow
`�
014
Total Suspextded �
+Sohcls,
r�
° Turbidtt}
,� �
SetfleabliSoLds
P
_ pH
FecalColrfornta
� `�, 'M
n_ ''�mm/dd/y'6jV
MGWj�
�`� a � mg/l F�
rdTvNTU
l'r&.mUl�l
Standardt� �
�* collnil
MAIL ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF THIS ANNUAL SUMMARY (INCLUDING ALL "NU FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE" & LIMIT
VIOLATIONS) BY MARCH 1 OF EACH YEAR TO
Division of Water Quality
Attn DWQ Central Files
1617 Matt SC V16e Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR AN) INPORAIATION REPORTLD
'I certify, under penalt-, of law, that this doeumcnt and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision ,n at-cordAnce with a sytitem designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Bksed on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of lines and imprisonment for knowing violations "
(Signature of Permittec)
Permit Date 1/1/2010-1213112014
(Date)
Last Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 2 of 2

I ANNUAL SUMMARY DMR - S' 'O tMWAT ;R I
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALLS (SDO)
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCGO20000
* -'r s ;"Kids � Ti i C E Sxril� t .A — s� r i e t1� r� yir ti
Report ALL STORMWATER3Manttonyn ? atatonCthts(form;(tn`cludtng No I~lowiand NofDtschaxgerant3kPermit Ld44t' tolarions) by MARCFI l�of ach year
♦ll a- d .b' Y7 ^a �LifHE r !vex �c r.. < n t 1 . m.�-.. ., .,cep ../ .as It Xa i Aux x i s r .,...w..� ,. i �r'Vra ti veal el-4:xs ^ zY
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO
FACILITY NAME
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES _
CERTIFIED I ABORATORY Lah #!
_Lab #
Part A Slormwater Munrlonne Reuuirements
NCG02
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR _
COUNIY
PHONE NO ( )
ADD TO LISTSERVE? YES ❑ NO ❑
EMAIL
ewe
{Outfall
Date`Saiuple
Collectedt-
tna/d r OI+~
fit 'Tier 2
Monthly#'afM
tr-
1Vloulto �
�'l �`
xm•
Tier 2
5at�nphngz �
sa ` E�•
Tatal�l+low
(MG)
� .tom
'Tota15us1►ended+
1
Solids
�
4'
1�trbldrty
(iVTUj}
Settleable
-w
Solids (ntl/l)
Totals
Rainfall
��"
- 1~vent
Duration
a Ybck c
'k.
�'
i
,.�,...•
TC rY
'If NO FLOW rn NO DISCHARGE Entet NO FLOW or NO DISCHARGE for each outfall here and the D ite Range
Z Per NCG02 Tier 2 Mornhly sampling Shall be done until 3 LonseLutive simples ate below the benchmark or within the henchniaik range
If a value is in excess of the benchmark nr outside the benchmaik range (for pH) you must iinplemc.nt the Tier I or 'I iei 2 responses in the General Pernur
° TSS benchmark values are 100 mg/l except to ORW HWQ trout and PNA waters where they are 50 mg/1
s The discharge shalt not c iuse an instantaneous measurement of the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 10 NTU for freshwater streams lakes and retiervnirs designated
as trout waters 25 NTU for all lakes and reservoirs and all salt waters 50 NTU for all other streams and surface waters Turbidity may be monitoied at the SDO
Alternatively the pernuttee may choose to monitor turbidity in the receiving water directly upstream and downstream of the SDO
Pt,rmit Date 1/1/2010-12/31/2014 Last Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page I of 2

Part S Vehicle Maintenance Activity MamtormZ Re uirements for facilities using > 55 gal of new motor otl/nionth on avers e
" '�
f 0utfa1l"
ear%&qof�4�.
4
r
'Date Sample
��
+� �� �~
NOF'LOR�1
Lx
I3i '](tier 2 �
1w r>
Monthlyi
fMonitorin ?
R
�yt''�
��� �4Mi
# of Months
7 �a . -
in,Tier32�
r
Sampli�
,e'�`���
itNew Motor
«;�
OiI Usage
-- - e
rti
Total6Flow
zW
(MG)
o PH using methods
g
�l6tSlA'SGT=AEM
wr
�zy �( g
Tota1I5 nded
5ol�ds(rno/dtl/yr,UR
it
t H 'a
p1st
'Total
rn
Event
menutes
rallmonth4
r kp �'_v
��.t,i
HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCELDENCES
A7 ANY ONE OUTI'AI L (INCLUDING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE)? YFS [-]NO
❑
HAVE YOU CONTAC 1 ED THE REGION' YFS ❑ NO ❑
WHO AT THE REGION HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH?
MAIL ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF THIS ANNUAL SUMMARY (IN{ LUI)ING ALL "No l FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE- & LIMIT
VIOLATION& BY MARCH I Of EACH YEAR TO
Division of Water Quality
Attn DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Ser%ice Centei
R neigh North Carolina 27699 1617
[phone]
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INh ORMATION REPORTLD
"1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under m} direction or supervision in aLcordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information cmbrnitted is, to the best of my knou[edge and belief, true accurate,
and complete I am aware that them are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations
(Signature of Permittee)
PLrmrt D1te I,' I e 2010- i 2/31/2014
(Bate)
List RLVihLd 0 1 -21 -11
Page 2 of 2

I ANNUAL SUMMARY )N R - STORMWATER ➢
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALLS (SDO)
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG020000
rFsnyiNueffejxs �1,—Llngt DeprAhNfOaowihageaPms�ku';iam-c a�.tio s.r� A�,��a rBeachyea�rh"f �r
r
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO NCG02_
FACILITY NAME
PERSON COLUXTING SAMPLES
CERTIFIED LABORATORY_ � Lab #
Lab #
Part A Storn►.Aater Monitor tn r Ret uiremenls
SAMPLL COLLECTION YEAR
COUN I'V
PHONE NO ( )
ADD 10 1 IS] SERVE? YNS ❑ NO ❑
EMAIL
lww"oPun1ffzaUlifj
r . r
�No r
��sx„st
Date"Sample
Collected
(moJdtilyr GfR
,NO;FLO,W}r c
e
r
Monthly
st�i��
1VI©tutoring
S
zv�nl
ZlE�ryr
# of Months
�-
l�er2
Sampling.
�z�
�'� '1 X.a..
k
t Total Flaw
)
Y .+� Ti*r"�'y.t•
; 'otal Suspendedi
�- at
Salitls.
A .t,
tt ; LS
'' 4�
Turbidity
7 u
(N'I'[Tj
., -
*",
Settlettble,r
^� -
Solids (enUl���t,
r
'rw "�"
Total,
Rainfall
r Je4.
i,
E t�
xluraHan '
tcas}�
(minu45
,? e4l
't '�'i-�;
Se IFOTI&&4�5a
4*PVV-%
' If NO FLOW rn NO DISC] IARGE hntei NO FLOW or NO DISCHARGE for e-ich outfall here and the Date R inge
Z Per NCG02 Tier 2 Monthly sampling Shall be done until 3 consecutive sample- are below the benchmark or within the benchmark range
' 11 a value is in excess of the benchmark or outside the benchmark range (for pfl) you must implement the Tier I or Tier 2 responses in the General Permit
1 SS benchmark values are 100 mg/l exc.e.pt in ORW HWQ trout and PNA waters where they are 50 mg/l
5 The discharge shall not cau,-e an instantaneous measurement of the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 10 NTU for freshwater streams fakes and reservoirs designated
as trout waters 25 NTU for all lakes and reservoirs and all salt waters 50 NTU for all other streams and surface waters T urbidity may be monitored at the SDO
Altern,itively the permittee m-ty choose to monitor turbidity in the receiving water directly upstream and downstream of the SDO
Pt,rrnit Date 1/1/2010-12/31/2014 Last Revised 0I-21-1 1
Page 1 of 2

Part B Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements for facilities using > 55 gal of neN& motor oil/month on average
�
P '
Outfall
No-r
��
�, �. � � f, �,
r i i
DatE Sample
t w
Collected
J
+ �Itt I
_ r
s NO FLOWC}�
r�u—...4.s� s�.�w �
�•re
x
Ii1 Tieri2
MQpi y
.i, r.. .
Moiu",all& 7
�r
Cyln)
at<5irt�,.,
w
i x
,, ��
#�of•Monfts ,
r- ,,r,
�tn�Tierf2
�x I f
m Sam Iin
P
`.T
u•�.�-,��..
i i '%,,�,
�r�`�2z�
New Motor
zs:
� 011 Usages
a x,4 x
r. ttUmonth'
-sk � Is
� ��1��^
Total Srlow
, -
r (MG)
,�
�'" � '+
TPH using me -hod
1 Y
I66lA SGT-FIEM
,�
�`a " �' � -'�' #:i
Total Suspended'
-
Solids
I F ti
r
�a�,
' YSpH
3 Staudards
s Units
� • � k
pi �
Total "
Rainfall
a in 1
w+- �
� €
Event
ar
Duration
mintites
-�
��.
_�15
� ,ii°'� = �a
� � 7
"xr, r
i� ,,,� *ltlU,..a.�.�,*
+
t�6- �
� �
-
�� �
s=a
HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXC.ELDENC.ES
AT ANY ONL OU I FAI I (INCLUDING VLHICLF MAIN I'ENANCE)9 YES ❑ NO ❑
HAVE YOU CON7 AC CED THE REGION' YES ❑ NO ❑
WHO AT THE REGION HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH?
MAIL ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF 7 HIS ANNUAL, SUMMARY (INCLUDING ALL "NO FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE' & LIMIT
VIOLATIONS) BY AIARCH I Of EACH YEAR TO
Division of Water Quality
Attn DWQ Central riles
1617 Mail Service Centei
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
YOU MUS7 SIGN I HIS CER7IFICATION h OR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED
"I certif}, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under m} direction or supervision in accordance with a s}stem designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true itelirate
and complete I am aware that there are significant penalms Tor submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations "
(Signature of Permittee) (Date)
Permit Date Il i o2010- i 2/31 /2014 1_ itt Raviu,d 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 2 of 2

Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For gurdance on filling out this form please visit http //h2o enr state nc us/su/i-arms_ Documents him#miscforms
Permit No NICI�I I_l�lll T1T1 or Certificate of Coverage No NICIGI_I_I 1_I_!_I
Facility Name
County Phone No
Inspector
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
Total Event Precipitation (Jmc hey )
Was this a Representative Storm Event" (Sue information below) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Please check your permit to verify if Qualitative Monitoring mutt be performed during a representative
storm event (regutrementr vary)
A "Representative Storm Event' is a storm event that measures greater than 0 1 inches of rainfall and that
is preceded by at least 72 hours (3 days) in which no storm event measuring greater than 0 1 inches has
L occurred A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no precipitation
By this signature, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
I Outfall Description
Outfall No Structure (pipe ditch, etc )
Receiving Stream
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area
2 Color Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red brown blue, etc ) and tint
(Light medium, dark) as descriptors
3 Odor Descnbe any distinct odors that the discharge may hale, (i e srnelis strongly of oil weak
chlorine odor, etc )
Page l of 2
S w U 242 112608

4 Clarity Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where I is clear
and 5 is very cloudy
1 2 3 4 5
5 Floating Solids Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids
1 2 3 4 5
6 Suspended Solids Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no Solids and 5 is extremely muddy
1 2 3 4 5
7 is there any foam in the stormwater di%Lharge9 Yes No
8 is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge9 Yes No
9 is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No
lQ Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
Mott LOW clarity high ponds, apci/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
indicative of pollutant exposure These conditions warrant further investigation
Page, 2 of 2
5wU 742 112608

NCG020845
0
Map Scale 1 24,000
S&P Sand and Gravel, LLC -
Bog ue Pit
Latitude 340 42' 39" N
Longitude 770 00' 21" W
County Carteret
Receiving Stream UT to Sanders Creek
Stream Class SA,HQW
Sub -basin 03-05-03 (White Oak River Basin)
Facility Location

Appendix F
Erosion & Sediment Control & Stormwater Calculations with Flow Data
Existing Rip Rap Weir Head vs Flow Chart
Sample Calculations Drawdown if using Orifice
Existing Discharge Channel Flow versus Depth
NCDENR Stormwater Permitting Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Rational Method Composite "C" Factors Pre Vs Post
Wet Detention Required Storage Volume Calculations
Peak Discharge Calculations using Rational Method
Approximate Stage Storage Table — Wet Detention Basin
NCDENR BMP Wet Detention Basin Performance Fact Sheet
NCDENR Sediment Basin Practice Standards and Specifications

Existing Broad Crested Weir at Outlet
Rock Rip Rap with semicircular crossection, 6 wide by 15' long
Ponded water each side of weir and irregular np rap makes flow width of about 4 feet
However to simplify roughly a broad crested weir Cd=3 0 4 feet long
Invert of existing weir is 8 36'
Required storage volume 18168 82
cf
Q=CdxLxH^15
Q=(3 0)(4)(H^1
5)
Elev
Head
Flow
Inches
Feet
H" 1 5
Cfs
(gpm)
MG day
836
000
000
000
000
000
000
841
060
005
001
013
6021
009
Nate 19 4 days drawdown re temp storage vol
846
120
010
003
038
17031
025
856
240
020
009
1 07
48170
069
866
876
360
480
030
040
016
025
1 97
304
86494
136246
1 27
196
Note 5 7 days drawdown re q temp storage vol
886
600
050
035
424
190410
274
896
720
060
046
558
250300
360
9 06
840
070
059
703
3154 14
454
_
916
960
080
072
859
365362
555
926
1060
090
085
1025
459831
662
936
1200
100
100
1200
538560
776
961
1500
125
140
1677
752660
1084
I
SSG
1800
150
184
2205
989396
1425
1036
2400 I
200
283 1
3394 1
1523278
2194
1050
2566
214
313
3757
1685989
2428
approximate top of bank at dtschafye
1303 I
5604
467
1009
121 10
5435123
7827
approximate top of southern containment berm
Note for estimating 6scharge the flow is only that porduced dumng
rainfall event

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE IF DESIGNING
MIN ORFICE
Retain_ temp pool 2-5 days
Required storage 16168 82
cf
_
Propose office 1 75' below normal pool
Design discharge rate at 4 days (5760 sec)
2811
cfs
Cd=O 60
_
Ho = (1 75+0 1) 13
1drawdown
16168821
cf divided by
576000
Ho=
0621
2,91
cfs
i
Q=Cd*Ao*sgrt 2*g*Ho
281=060xAoxsgrt644*062
Ao= 0 74
sf
Use 12►n dia PVC a@ 1 75' below perm poo!

Discharge Channel Cals -sandy Isoftom with weeds
j
2 5 ft deep trapezoidal
top width
1 14 50
ft
rob
250
ft
slope
00067
ft/ft
bottom width
650
ft
channel side slopes
ton 1
M=
2
Width
65
ft
B=
65
slope
0 0067
ft ft
S=
00067
weeds sandly loam
I
n=
0041,
Permisible velocities alluvial silts and grass
3 5-4 5
Area of Flow A=Sy+My^2
Wetted Permiter P=B+2y(l +M"2)" 5
Hydraulic radius
R= A/P
Manning Eq
Q=(1489/nj(A)(RAO
6S7)(SAO
5)
Q
Flow Depth
y"2
Area flow
Weft P
(1+M"2)"0 5
H d R
RA0 667
S"0 5
1 4891n
Velocity
Q GPM
de
In
ft
ft
sf
ft
!PSgpm
0 430
12
01
0 010
067
6 948
224
0 096431
62101221
0 082
37 225
064
193
1 375
24
02
0040
138
7 396
224
01865871
0 3263461
0 082
37 225
100
617
2 725
36
03
0 090
0160,
213
7 844
224
0271545
04191531
0 082
37 225
128
1223
4 443
48
04
_
292
8 292
224
0352147
0498499
0 082
37 225
152
1994
6 510
6
05
0 2501
375
874
224
0429062
056871
0 082
37 225
174
2922
8 915
72
06
0 360
462
9 188
224
0.50283
063219
0 082
37 225
193
4001
11 655
84
07
0 490
553
9 636
_
224
057389
069046
0 082
37 225
211
5231
14 727
96
08
0 640
648
10 084
224
0642602
0744556
0 082
37 225
227
6610
18133
108
09
0 810
747
10 532
224
0709267
0795225
0 082
37 225
243
8138
218731
12
1
1 000
85
1098
224
0774135
0843025
0 082
37 225
257
9817
457301
18 f
is
2 250
1425
1322
224
1077912
1051316
0 082
37 225
321
20523
786291
24
2
4 000
21
1546,
224
1358344
1226641
0 082
37 225
3 74
35289

Permit No
(ro ba Provided by 0w4)
woe w p 7'
�9°�
NCDENR
O 'K
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
WET DETENTION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This frNm must be filled oid printed and submitted
The Required Items Checklist (Part f1l) must be printed filled out and submitted along with all of the required information
I PROJECT INFORMATION Pi g i�r #" sz� a �sd,4 (��u"s '4R � �, f�Pk w� �11 i"',e irk , 11 4i q �'� i , =
Project name S & P Sand and Gravel Boege Loop Rd Bauge NC
Contact person kick wiRifard
Phone number 252 393-2504
Date 111422014 - -
Drainage area number 1
II DESIGN INFORMATION „ ;�a 'If
Site Characteristics
Drainage area 916 938 ft
Impervious area post -development 52 272 re
% impervious 5 70 %
Design rainfall depth 15 in
Storage Volume Non SA Waters
Minimum volume required
Volume provided
Storage Volume SA Waters
15 runoff volume
Pre4evelopment 1 yr 24 hr runoff
Post-0evelopmeril 1 yr 24-hr runoff
Minimum volume required
Volume provided
Peak Flow Calculations
Is the prelpost control of the lyr 24hr storm peak flow required?
1 yr 24-hr rainfall depth
Rational C pre-devefopmenl
Rational C post -development
Rainfall intensity 1 yr 24 hr storm
Pre -development 1 yr 24 to peak flow
Post -development 1 yr 24 hr peak flow
PretPost 1 yr 24 hr peak flow control
Elevations
Temporary pool elevation
Permanent pool elevation
SHWT elevation (approx at the perm pool elevation)
Top of 10ft vegetated shelf elevation
Bottom of 10ft vegetated shelf elevation
Sediment cleanout top elevation (bottom of pond)
Sedimentcleanout bottom elevation
Sediment storage provided
Is there additional volume stored above the state -required temp pool?
Elevation of the top of the additional volume
13 253 ft3
16 169 ft3
32 338 ft3
16169 ft3
16169 ft3
n (Y or N)
37m
025 (unitless)
0 30 (unitless)
015 iNhr OK
0 81 ft3/sec
097 fe&c
016 fOlsec
8 41 fmsl
836 Irrist
a 00 fmsl
600 fmsl
750 fmsl Data not needed for calculation option #1 but OK if provided
5 00 frml
3 00 fmsl Data not needed for calculation option #1 but OK 6 provided
200 h
y (Y or N)
a 7 Imsl Insufficient Must equal the temp pool elev previously entered
Form SW401 wet Defeneon Basin Rev 9-WIa/12 Pans I & 8 Design Summary Page i of 2

Permit No
(to be provided Dy AWQ)
II' DESIGN INFORMATION
Surface Areas
Area temporary pool
Area REQUIRED pennanem pool
SAIDA rabo
Area PROVIDED permanent pool Ap _,
Area bottom of 1Oft vegetated shelf Ab, d,,x
Area sediment cleanout top elevation (bottom of pond) Az,.d
volumes
Volume temporary pool
Volume permanent pool V,,rm_,d
Volume forebay (sum of forebays if more than one forebay)
Forebay % of permanent pool volume
SAIDA Table Data
Design TSS removal
Coastal SAIDA Table Used?
Mountain/Piedmont SAIDA Table Used?
SAIDA ratio
Average depth (used in SAIDA table)
Calculation option 1 used? (See 110 2b)
Volume permanent pool Vim,, pcd
Area provided permanent pool Ap S_pw
Average depth calculated
Average depth used in SAIDA d,v (Round to nearest 0 5R)
Calculation option 2 used? (See Figure 10 2b)
Area provided permanent pool Ap,.-�-
Area bottom of 10ff vegetated shelf AW 0,0
Area sediment cleanout top elevation (bottom of pond) Ae«_,,w
261 976 file
7 336 Rz
080 (uni�ess)
261 976 R` OK
249 328 R`
212858 ft`
16 169 R'
1 073 042 fl3
0 R3
90 %
Y (Y or N)
n (Y or N)
0 80 (unilless)
y (Y or N)
1 073 042 ft'
261976 R`
410 R
40ft
n (Y or N)
251 976 Y
249 328 It'
212858 fe
Depth (distance btw bottom of lOR shelf and top of sediment) 2 50 R
Average depth calculated R
Average depth used in SAIDA d,, (Round to down to nearest 05ft; ft
Drawdown Calculations
Drawdown through onficel
Diameter of orifice (If circular)
Area of onfice (if non -circular)
Coefficient of discharge (00)
Driving head lH{ )
Drawdown through weir?
Weir type
Coefficient of discharge (Q
Length of weir (L)
Dnvmg head (H)
Pre-devekopmeol 1 yr 24 hr peak flow
Post -development l yr 24 hr peak flow
Storage volume discharge rate (through discharge onfice or weir)
Storage volume drawdown time
Additional Information
Vegetated side slopes
Vegetated shelf slope
Vegetated shelf width
Length of flowpath to width ratio
Length to vndth rabo
Trash rack for overflow & onfice?
Freeboard provided
Vegetated filter provided?
Recorded drainage easement provided?
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Drain mechanism for maintenance or emergencies is
n
(Y or N)
1200 in
in
060 (unittess)
0 62 It
Y (Y or N)
broad
(unilless)
3
(unilless)
4
R
005
ft
0 93 R'"sec
130 ff%ec
0 58 f P3 sec
19 34 days
31
OK
OK
OK
Enter either diameter of onfice or area of non -circular onfice Do not enter
both diameter and area for a circular orifice
Insufficient drawdown time Must be within 2 5 days
OK
1
-- -- R
6 1 OK
180 1 OK
Y (Y or N) OK
1 0 It. OK
n (Y or N) OK
n (Y or N) Insufficient Recorded drainage easement required
y - - (Y or N) OK
pump
Form SW401 Wet detenl*n Eason -Rev 9-41IW12 Pnrts r & It Design Summary Page 2 of 2

Rational Peak Discharges
Morehead City Station NCyAA
Tc=12 min use 10min
I
I
Int 1 r 24 hr
0 15
Jin/hr
Depth 1 yr 24 hr
366
in
lnt 2 yr 10m
5 42
jin47r
I Depth 25yr 24hr
849
in
lnt 10 yr 10m
7 07
inMr
lnt 25yr 24hr
0 35
iNhr
Note Area South of affected area unchanged therefore post =pre, Calculation
are for Drainage Area to PWBasin
Pre
Sediment
13asin
Requirements
Q=
C
I
I A
1 r
2415
025
4 590
2105
Pnme Spilhvay Q2yr
34 52
cfs
l yr 24hr
079
025
015
2105
Volume 1800 cf per dis ac
J
25272 00
of
2 r
2852
025
542
2105
Min Surface 435 sf/ 1 cfs Q70
195&4 78
sf
045
ac
10yr
3721
025
707
2105
Post
Average Depth 7 54 01=3 5
1yr
2923
036
4 590
2105 j
Volume Provided=
1073042 03
cf 1
1 yr 24hr
095
030
015
2105
24 63
ac ft
2yr
34 52
030
—5420-7
2105
10 r
4502
030
757 T
2105
25yr24hr
225
030
035
2105
Existing Pond Elevabon p
8 0 to 8 5
f
Existing Surface Area sf
I
261795 50
sf

I
Water Quality
Wet Detention Volume Simple Method
Sediment and Water Quality Basin desgin for 85%tss
water quality
use 90 vs req 85 since no
plantings of f veg shelf
Drainage Area to pit / pond =
2105
Jac
Estimated SHWT
800
Design Runoff
SA HOW
Rd =1 5
Ifn
la=
implot area
ta=
120
2434
Rv =
0 05 +
0 9 (la)
la=
0 049
Rv=
010
!a=
0 05
W
V=
13630x
Rdx
Rv
A
V=
1 363000
150
010
2434
V=
1326313
cf
Coastal Check Pre vs Post 24hr
Vpre=
1 yr 24hr-
366
3630x3 66x(05)24 34
Pre Rv=
0 05+
0 09(0)
Vpre=
-
16168 82
cf
-
Pre Rv=
005
--�
--
Vpost=
36300 66x( 10)24 34
_
_
Post Rv=
010
Vpost=
32337641
cf
Vpo-pr=
3233764
minus
1616882
_I
Vpo-pr=
16168 82
cf
Provide
16168 82
cf of temporary storage above permanent pool min for stormwater wq
basin

Rational Peak Di. echarges
Morehead City Station_ NQ_AA
Tc=12 min use 10min
Int 1 yr 24 hr
0 15
m1hr
Depth 1 yr 24 hr
366
in
Int 2 yr 10m
5 42
m1hr
Depth 25yr 24hr
6 49
in
Int 10 r 10m
7 07
1 inihr
Int 25yr 24hr
0 35
inlhr
I
Note Area South of affected area unchanged therefore post =pre, Calculation are for Drainage Area to PitlBasin
Pre
Sediment
Basin
Re uirements
Q=
C
I
A
lyr
2415
025
4 590
2105
Pumay Spillway Q2yr
34 52
cis
J
1 yr 24hr
0 79
025
015
2105
Volume 1800 cf per dis ac
25272 00
cf
2yr
2852
025
542
2105
Mtn Surface 435 sf/ 1 cfs Q10
19584 78
sf
0 45
ac
10yr
3721
025
707
2105
Post
Average Depth 7 6 -4 0 =3 6
1 r
2923
030
4 590
2105
Volume Provided=
1073042 03
cf
1 yr 24hr
095
030
015
2105
24 63
ac-ft
2yr
34 52
030
5 420
2105
10yr
4502
Q 30
707 J
2105
25yr24hr
225
030
035 i
2105
i
Exishng Pond Elevation typ
18
0 to 8 5
f
Existing Surface Ards sf
26179560
sf
i
I

Approximate Stage Storage Releationship
Existing Rock Rip Rap Weir Elevation
836
ft
Existing Surface Area 1
1
261795 60
sf
Approximate normal pool elevation
8 0-8 5
ft
General Slope 3 1
Note Surface area approximated by observation and assuming 3 1 slopes typcial
Description
Elev
Surface Area
Avg Area
Incremental Vol
Cumulative Vol
Surface
Avg Depth
Area ac
Bottom Sed
300
1758900
0001
000
040
400
160332 00
8896050
8896050
8895050
Option 1
Top Sed Stor
500
212858 00
186595 00
186595 00
275555 50
489
600
227381 00
220119 50
220119 50
495675 00
700
241985 00
234683 00
234683 00
730358 00
Bot Ex Self
750
249328 00
245656 50
122828 25
853186 25
572..
Top Ex Self
800
256670 00
252999 00
126499 50
979685 75
Normal Pool
836
261976 00
259323 00
9335628
1073042 03
601
410
_
Ex Weir
reg storage
006
16168 82
I 1089210 85
temp pool
842
max stage 25yr
907
261976 00
261976 00
185348 02
1258390 05
1 ft freeboard
1007
TOB Ex min
1050

NCDENR Stormwater BMP Manual Chaoter Revised 06-16-09
10. Wet Detention Basin
Description
A wet detention basin is a stormwater management facihty that includes a permanent pool of
water for removing pollutants and additional capacity above the permanent pool for detaining
stormwater runoff
Re atory Credits
Pollutant Re?noval
85% Total Suspended Solids
25% Total Nitrogen
40% Total Phosphorus
Water Quanhhj
yes Peak Runoff Attenuation
no Runoff Volume Reduction
Advantages
- Can be aesthetically pleasing and can be
sited in both low- and high -visibility areas
- Can provide wildlife habitat and a focal
point for recreation
- Provides good water quantity control for
reducing the frequency of flooding events
that cause bank erosion
Feasibility Considerations
Med-Large
Land Requirement
Ivied
Cost of Construction
Med
Maintenance Burden
Med-Large
Treatable Drainage Basin Size
Med
Possible Site Constraints
Med
Community Acceptance
Disadvantages
- Sometimes create problems such as
nuisance odors, algae blooms, and
rotfing debris when not property
maintained
Local regulations may impose
unappealing features such as fencing
around basins to reduce safety hazards
May attract excessive waterfowl, which
can be a nuisance and can increase fecal
cohform levels
- May contribute to thermal pollution so
may not be appropriate in areas where
sensitive aquatic species live
Wet Detention Basin 10-1 July 2007

NCDENR Stormwater BMP Manual
Revised 06-16-09
Major Design Elements*
Required by the NC Administrative Rules of the Environmental Management Commission
Other specifications may be necessary to meet the stated pollutant removal requirements
1 e
1
Sizing shalt take into account all runoff at ultimate build -out, including off -site drainage
2
Vegetated slopes shall be no steeper than 3 1
3
BMP shall be located in a recorded drainage easement with a recorded access easement to
a public ROW
4
Basin discharge shall be evenly distributed across a minimum 30 feet long vegetative filter
strip unless tt is designed to remove 90% TSS (A 50-ft filter is required to some locations)
5
If any portion is used for S&EC during construction must be cleaned out and returned to
design state
6 IThe
design storage shall be above the permanent pool
7
Discharge rate of the treatment volume shall completely draw down between 2 and 5
days
8
The average depth of the permanent pool shall be a minimum of 3 feet The average
depth shall be calculated as described in Figure 10-2b
9 JPermanent
pool surface area shall be determined using Tables10-1, 10-2, 10-3, and 10-4
10
IThe flow within the pond shall not short-circuit the pond
11
BMP shall be designed with a forebay
12
Basin side slopes shall be stabilized with vegetation above the permanent pool level
13
The pond shall be designed with side slopes below the 10ft shelf stabilized per what the
sotls will support and per the PE's judgment
14
The basin shall be designed with sufficient sediment storage to allow for proper operation
between scheduled cleanouts
Required by DWQ policy' These aretbased on available research, and represent what DWQ
considers necessary to achieve the stated remo"vaLefficiencies
15
BMP shall not be located to produce adverse impacts on water levels in adjacent wetlands
A minimum 10-foot wide vegetated shelf shall be installed around the perimeter The
16
inside edge of the shelf shall be 6" below the permanent pool elevation, the outside edge
of the shelf shall be 6" above the permanent pool elevation
17
The forebay volume should be about 20% of the total permanent pool volume, leaving
about 80% of the design volume in the main pool
18
Freeboard shall be a minimum of 1 foot above the maximum stage of the basin
19
The permanent pool elevation shall be within 6 inches (plus or minus) of the SHWT
elevation
*For multiple pond permits, please specify the areas of the site (including the lot
numbers) draining to each pond
Wet Detention Basin 10-2 July 2007

Practice Standards and Specifications
6.61PEDIMENT BASIN
0
Definition An earthen embankment suitably located to capture sediment with a primary
spillway system consisting of a riser and barrel pipe
Purpose To retain sediment on the construction site, and prevent sedimentation in off -site
streams, lakes, and drainageways
Conditions Where Special limitation —This practice applies only to the design and installation of
Practice Applies sediment basins where failure of the structure would not result in the loss of life,
damage to homes or buildings, or interrupt the use of public roads or utilities
All high hazard potential dams and structures taller than 25 feet, and that also
have a maximum storage capacity of 50 acre-feet or more are subject to the
N C. Dam Safety Law of 1967
Sediment basins are needed where drainage areas exceed design criteria of other
measures Specific criteria for installation of a sediment basin are as follows
• Keep the drainage area less than 100 acres,
• Ensure that basin location provides a convenient concentration point for
sediment iaden flows from the area served,
• Ensure that basin location allows access for sediment removal and
proper disposal under all weather conditions, and
• Keep the basin life limited to 3 years, unless it is designed as a
permanent structure,
Do not locate sediment basins in intermittent or perennial streams
Planning Select key locations for sediment basins during initial site evaluation Install
Considerations basins before any land -disturbance takes place within the drainage area
Select basin sites to capture sediment from all areas that are not treated
adequately by other sediment controls Always consider access for eleanout and
disposal of the trapped sediment Locations where a pond can be formed by
constructing a low dam across a natural swale are generally preferred to sites that
require excavation Where practical, divert sediment -free runoff away from the
basin
Sediment trapping efficiency is primarily a function of sediment particle size and
the ratio of basin surface area to inflow rate Therefore, design the basin to have
a large surface area for its volume Figure 6 61a shows the relationship between
the ratio of surface area to peak inflow rate and trap efficiency observed by
Barfield and Clar (1986)
Sediment basins with an expected life greater than 3 years should be designed as
permanent structures Often sediment basins are converted to stormwater ponds
In these cases, the structure should be designed by a qualified professional
engineer experienced in the design of dams Permanent ponds and artificial takes
are beyond the scope of this practice standard USDA Soil Conservation
Services Practice Standard Ponds Code No 378 provides criteria for design of
permanent ponds
Rey 5/13 6 61 1

Praehee Standards and Specifications
100 _
Z
W $p
N*
W
W
70
0.
60
so
.001
LOAMY SAND
i
CLAY LOAM
� IS
.01
x X 1 a YR STORM
or XX
X 'LEGExND` ,
SILT L6J SOIL
,
0 3X0V O
I OXOV X
2 OXOV 13
3.OXOV, r
n F
O� LrOANIYISAND t
i411 VOLUMES
A CLAY LOAM
u
ALL VOLUMES
� 4 m
K�
AC/CFS
SURFACE AREA/PEAK DISCHARGE
10
Figure 6 61a Relationship between the ratio of surface area to peak inflow rate and trap efficiency
Design Criteria
6612
Summary
Pnmary Spillway
Maximum Drainage Area
Minimum Sediment Storage Volume
Minimum Surface Area
Minimum L/W Ratio
Maximum L/W Ratio
Minimum Depth
Dewatermg Mechanism
Minimum Dewatermg Time
Baffles Required
Temaorary Sediment Basin
Riser/Barrel Pipe
100 acres
1800 cubic feet per acre of disturbed area
435 square feet per efs of Q,o peak inflow
2l
6l
2 feet
Skiinmer(s) attached at bottom of riser
pipe or flashboard nser
48 hours
3 baffles*
rNote Banns less than 20 fleet in length may use 2 baffles)
Drainage areas- Limit drainage areas to 100 acres
Design basin life- Ensure a design basin life of 3 years or less
Dam height- Limit dam height to 15 feet Height of a dam is measured from the
top of the dam to the lowest point at the downstream toe Volume is measured
from the top of the dam when determining if the dam impounds enough water to
be regulated by the Dam Safety Law
Rev 5/13

w
Mine Operations Plan (MOP)
Bogue Pit
Mine Permit # 16-23
General Nationwide Discharge Permit # COC NCG020845
Project Site Location Address Old Whiteoak rd. off E end of Bogue Loop Rd
County, Mailing City, State, Zip Code Carteret County, Newport NC 28570
Project Site Telephone Number NA no office on site
Operator(s):
Company or Organization Name S & P Sand and Gravel, LLC
Name Charles R Williford & William K Page
Address PO Box 1436, 4846A Hwy 24 E
City, State, Zip Code Swansboro, NC 28584
Telephone Number 252-393-2504
Fax [phone]
Operations Managers and Contact(s):
Company or Organization Name Same as above Operators
MOP Preparation Date:
01 / 2014

This Mine Operations Plan (MOP) covers the operations at the Bogue Pit It has been
developed as required under the Nationwide Stormwater & Mine Dewatermg General
Permit NCG020000, with Certificate of Coverage number COC NCG020845 and in
general conformance with the Mine Act of 1971 (amended 2000) This MOP describes
this facility and its operations
1 1 Contact Information
Contact Charles R Williford Office Phone [phone]
Title Owner/ Manager Erna il willifordrick@yahoo com
Responsibilities Direct and control operations, assign responsible parties to perform
mining operations, including monitoring, training and administration of Mine Operations
Plan and Stormwater Pollution Plan
Contact William Page Office Phone [phone]
Title Owner 1 Operator
Responsibilities Oversee mine operations, train personnel and administer Mine
Operations and Stormwater Pollution Plan
Contact Earl Boyd Office 252-393-2504
Title Vice President Operations
Responsibilities Oversee mine operations and personnel and administration of Storm
Water Pollution Plan
12 History
The pit is operated to mine sands and gravels without any processing of natural materials
The pit has been mined for about 15 years, previous]) it was permitted as the Russell
Mine The current owners took over operations in 2006 and in 2013 obtained an
additional permit for the discharge of waste (stormwater runoff) from the pit The land is
not leased it is owned by S&P Sand and Gravel LLC The mine permit 9 is valid till
November of 2016 and the nationwide general permit for waste discharge is typically
valid on a four year cycle for the state The states nationwide general permit expires
December 31, 2014
2 Mine Activities
The pit is operated to mine sands and gravels without any processing of natural materials
The owners use excavators to load directly into dump trucks and or temporarily stockpile
for secondary loading into clump trucks The owners operate the pit in conformance with
the Mine Act of 1971 (rev 200) in general assuring a protection of the surrounding
environment by maintaining natural and or planted vegetative buffers The property lines
are marked with flagging and or stakes in order for operators to visually note the need to

The state also requires mines to perform reclamation of the disturbed areas of the mine
upon deactivating of operations The sandy loam and marine terrace soils typically
should not be left with slopes exceeding approximately a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical cut
Caution should be exercised during excavation process to leave the bank cuts from the
buffer down to the pond at these slopes to readily allow for planting and reclamation
Inspection of the Erosion and Sediment Control & Water Quality Wet Detention Basin
shall be inspected weekly and following rain events which generate discharges from the
pit Spills of any fluids considered to be environmental contaminates must be cleaned up
immediately and reported to the state if exceeding the allowable criteria outlined in the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
In general due to the long history of operations at the mine the boundary of the existing
wet detention basin represents the limits of proposed disturbance along the Northern,
Eastern and especially the Southern boundary Note Sanders creek runs along the
southern boundary and therefore operations in this area and along the Western lower area
at the southern containment berm are the most sensitive and extra caution shall be
employed for any operations Mine operators shall assure proper approval from Rick
Williford, William Page and Earl Boyd before disturbing any existing vegetation or
performing earthwork operations in this area of the mine
4 Reclamation Planning
Areas of the mine shall be reclaimed upon completion of activities Again typically no
more than 2 5 to 3 1 slopes allowed from the undisturbed buffers to the final pond area
shall be allowed Erosion of reclaimed slopes shall be prevented by planting of
vegetation Depending on the timing of the reclamation the general specifications
provided by the State in the Standard Practices and Specifications manual shall be
followed a copy of which is available at NCDENR's website, land quality division,
erosion and sediment control section

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E Davis, PE, CPM Pat McCrory, Governor
Director John E Skvada, III, Secretary
September 27, 2013
Charles R Williford
S & P Sand and Gravel, LLC
P 0 Box 1436
Swansboro, NC 28584
Subject General Permit No NCG020000
S & P Sand and Gravel, LLC - Bogue Pit
COC NCGO20845
Carteret County
Dear Mr Williford
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on May 2, 2003,
we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the
subject state - NPDES general permit This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as
subsequently amended)
Please take notice that this Certificate of Coverage (COC) is not transferable except
after notice to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage
This NPDES discharge permit contains conditions that require you to comply
with the Mining Permit for this operation We note that you were issued a Notice of
Deficiency (NOD) dated July 9, 2013 that advised specific corrective actions for compliance
with that Mining Permit (16-23) You must achieve compliance with that permit and apply
for any necessary Mining Permit modifications in order to discharge dewatering water
Please be aware that mine dewatering at your site has the potential to impact
adjacent wetlands The specific i equirements for mine dewatering at facilities near
wetlands can be found in Part I11, Section E of your permit You must have an approved
Q�eration and Monitorink.fO&MI_PJan-before mine dewaterine discharees occur at
your facility Discharging mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be
subject to enforcement action An Operation and Monitoring Plan for your facility must be
submitted to the Wilmington Regional Office within 60 days of your receipt of this permit
Contact Dan Sams at the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone] for more
information about the approval process

Mr Charles R Williford
September 27, 2013
Page 2 of 3
Your 0&M Plan should include
• A wetland delineation to identify all sui face water s, including wetlands in the vicinity of
the mine inside and outside of the mine site boundary This must be performed by the US
Army Corp of Engineei s (USACOE), or by a consultant and then cei tified that the USACOE is
in agi eement
• Site map This map should indicate the landscape and position of all wetlands (based on
the delineation), ditches, pi oposed well placement, bon row areas, overburden storage, mine
excavation pits, vehicle maintenance areas, mining i oads, buffers, rain gauges, fuel and bulk
fuel storage areas, sediment traps, settling basins, buildings and other impervious
structures, stormwatei coati ols and the mine footprint
• The amount of buffer around the mine footprint and wetlands
• Identify all discharge points from the mine and the type of discharge (stormwater,
mine dewatering, and/oi process wastewater overflow) For mine dewatering, specify the
anticipated rate of discharge If this discharge will vary, estimate the maximum rate of
discharge
• Identify surface waters that may be impacted (Sanders Creek and Goose Creek), the
classification of those waters (SA,HQM, and how the operation will ensure the discharge
from the mine will not cause an exceedance of the water quality standards This includes
determining the flow rate at low tide conditions in the tributary to Sanders Creek that
will receive dewatering flows (see more information Inter in this letter)
• Design specifications and calculations for settling basins used to reduce tui bidity and
TSS prior to discharge What size storm event have the settling ponds and i etention pond
been designed for? (Foi example the 10-year 24-hour event)
• Identify whether shallow monitoring wells are necessary to monitor and pi otect
against impacts to wetlands if not, the plan should thoroughly explain why not (for
example, dewatering will not change the hydraulic gi adient in away that will drain nearby
wetlands because discharges will rehydi ate them)
• For mining with the potential to drain wetlands, a 'radius of influence" calculation must
be pi ovided for mines intending to dewater from the pit if there are surface waters of
wetlands close to the pit that could be impacted Provide all assumptions used for
determining this radius of influence around the mining site Once the zone of influence is
determined, identify the wetlands in the impact area and locate monitoring wells
accordingly If this is not applicable, explain why
The Regional Office may advise you on other aspects during the 0&M Plan approval
process
This site will discharge to a receiving stream designated as High Quality Waters
(HQW) Asa result, a more stringent TSS limit and wastewater discharge volume al2Phes
The General Permit limits total wastewater flow to 50 percent of the 7Q10 base flow for all
discharges to HQW-classified waters However, a 7Q10 base flow for the unnamed
tributary leading to Sanders Creek cannot be calculated because these waters are tidally
influenced To comply with the permit and protect these sensitive waters, you must
determine the flow rate of the tributary at low tide conditions and provide that flow rate
in the O&M Plan We recommend hiring an engineer that can measure flow with a flow
meter device, calculate the flow based on stream dimension measurements, or use an
alternative strategy with a sound engineering basis If that flow determination is

Mr Charles R Williford
September 27, 2013
Page 3 of 3
acceptable, the Division will advise you of the discharge flow limit based on your
deter mination to its approval letter
The upper portion of Goose Creek is also designated as Primary Nursery Area
(PNA) waters by the N C Marine Fisheries Commission I he Division of Marine Fisheries
approved coverage for this mine under the General Permit NCG020000 with the specific
preference that dewatering be accomplished by gravity flow (no pumping) only Should
dewatering by any other means (e g , by pumping, or if the pit is ever dredged, which
changes the dewatering discharge to process wastewater), you must first notify the
Division for approval and revision to the COC because of the sensitive shellfish
resources downstream
Please note that mine dewatering wastewater includes wet pit overflows caused
solgly by direct rainfall and groundwater seepage for this type of mining operation Any
discharge of this water (and any stormwater commingled with it) is subject to the effluent
limitations in this permit
This pi oject is located in one of Not th Carolina's 20 coastal counties Coastal
stot mwater management rules (1SA NCAC 2H 1000) may t equii e an additional State
Stormwater Permit (different from the NPDES mining activities discharge permit) Please
contact Georgette Scott in the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone] if you have
questions about whether you ai e required to submit an application for a State Stormwater
permit
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which
may be required by the Division of Energy, Mining, and Land Resources, or permits
required by the Division of Water Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other
federal or local governmental permit that may be required
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bethany
Georgoultas at telephone number [phone]
Sincerely,
for Tracy E Davis, P E , CPM
cc Wilmington Regional Office / Attn Brian Lambe
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Program Files

Lambe, Brian
From Georgoulias, Bethany
Sent Thursday, September 19, 2013 11 18 AM
To Lambe, Brian
Cc Conway, Jean Bennett Bradley
Subject RE S&P Gravel Mine
Hi Brian,
talked with Jean today, and I'm on the home stretch of S&P Sand and Gravel's Certificate of Coverage
Receiving waters and future dredging For all intents and purposes, the dewatering appears to discharge to a UT to
Sanders Creek, SA,HQW (and into a Primary Nursery Area in Goose Creek) Shellfish Sanitation and 0CM are okay with
the gravity flow dewatering but need to be notified if there's a change I've determined that we cannot prohibit future
dredging water discharge on the basis of ORW waters farther downstream at Goose Creek/Bogue Sound (because this
discharge goes into SA waters, notlustsome UTdraining to ORW)—taut, I'm not sure these agencies would encourage or
approve coverage of that discharge here given the special habitat anyway I'll address this in the final issuance letter
Dewatering flow limit Your direction to them to install a mechanism to control the flow will be necessary for
compliance with NCG02 Jean says it's feasible to estimate flow in the channel or ditch where their dewatering water
will enter She can help you do that if you need to Because of the flow limit in the permit (50% of the 7Q10), we need
an estimated flow at low tide conditions to establish a flow discharge limit for this operation I need that information for
the cover letter
Wetlands O&M Plan Jean advises that there are probably wetlands on at least one side of the mine, and Mr Williford
needs to have them identified It means they need to prepare an O&M Plan — the first step of which is to get a
delineation done Here it's not a "Pumping" O&M Plan, but they need to address how they'll guard against potential
impacts The permit requires that the WiRO approve that O&M plan before they can dewater Here is an excerpt from
my cover letter so far
Please be awai a that mine dewatei ing at your site has the potential to impact adjacent wetlands The specific
i equirements for mint dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in Pai t 111 Section E ofyoui permit You must have
an annroved Oneration and Monitorine fO&Ml Plan before mine dewaterine discharees occur at vour
facility Discharging mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action An Operation
and Monitoring Plan for your facility must be Submitted to the Wilmington Regional Office within 60 days of your receipt of
this pei mit Contact Dan Sams at the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone] foi more infoi matron about the
approval process
Your 0&M Plan should include
• A wetland delineation to identify all surface waters including wetlands in the vicinity of the mine inside and outside
of the mine site boundary This must be perfoi med by the US Army Coi p of Engineei s (USACOE), of by a consultant
and then certified that the USACOE is in agreement
+ Site map This map should indicate the landscape and position of all wetlands (based on the delineation), ditches,
proposed well placement, bore ow areas over bui den stcn age, mine excavation pits, vehicle maintenance al ta%, mining
roads, buffers, rain gauges fuel and bulk fuel storage areas sediment traps, settling basins buildings and other
impervious str uctures stoi mwater conti ols and the mine footprint
• The amount of buffer around the mine footprint and wetlands
• identify all discharge points from the mine and the type of discharge (stoi mwater, inane dewatering and/oi
process wastewater overflow) For mine dewatering specify the anticipated rate of discharge If this discharge
will vary, estimate the maximum i ate of dischai ge

• Identify surface waters that maybe impacted (Sanders Creek and Goose Creek) the classification of those waters
(SA HQW) and how the open ation will enure the diwhargc from the mine will not cause an cxceedance of the water
quality standai ds
• Design specifications and calculations for sctthng basins u,ed to i educe tut bidity and 7 SS prior to dischai ge What
size %form event have the settling ponds -ind retention pond been designed for? (For example, the t0-yeai 24-hour
event)
• Identify whether shallow monitoring wells are necessary to monitor and pi otect against impacts to wetlands If
not, the plan Should thoi oughly explain wiry not (fort example dewatei ing will not change the hydt aulic gradient in a
way that will drain new by wetlands because discharge,, will rehydi ate then)) If dischal ge is into wetlands, the plan
must addres, how non erosive flow will he achieved
• For mining with the potential to drain wetlands, a radiuti of influe-nce' calculation must be provided for nines
intending to d(-water from the pit if thei e are tiurtaee waters or wetlands close to the pit that could be
impacted Pi ovide all assumptions u,ed for deter mining this radius of influence ai ound the mining site Once the
cone of influence is determined identify the wetlands in the in)pact ai ea and locate monitot ing wells accot dingly
The Regional Office may advise you on other components or details dui ing the approval process
Jean, do you have any comments or additional advice for me and Brian on this list? Brian, historically Central Office has
been less involved rn the O&M Plan review because our group's expertise with wetlands ore limited I used Linda Willis'
original guidance document to help me with this list You all might need to look to DWR in your office for some
assistance, especially with the NPDES position in DEMLR currently vacant The major step here is to identify what's on or
near the site first, and then evaluate what needs to be in place for the mining operation to ensure they are not
impacted
Does this sound suitable to go into the cover letter?
As soon as we get a flow estimate, we can issue the COC, as long as you all are okay with what we're asking in the O&M
Plan
Thanks l
Bethany
fie thwa, Oeotgoulim Lni it e3rii1iented Ln ine ei
NCDENR: Dnision of FnergN Mintrdl and l and Resources
StollmalLl l'ttmitting 1'togram
1612 Maul Scr►ice Center Raleigh NC 27699-1612
,i12 N Salisbury Strut Raleigh NC 27604
919 1807-6372 (phony) 9191 807-6494 (fax)
WLbsitL htip Ilportal ncdeni orghkebllrlstorm"ater
1 marl cor r e spondc OIL L to mal h nm thm oddi c %� rnot be urbn er In lit, North ( arolina Public. R cord% tau and nur) he d i wk,& d to dur d Inrrm s
From Lambe, Brian
Sent Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8 03 AM
To Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject RE Maps for S&P Gravel Mine - Newport, Carteret County
The blue lines I added to the map are what I have seen with my eyes The outlet channel is circled l added what [think
is sanders creek on the west of the dirt road I think the trib runs into the sanders right before hwy 24 where it hits a
culvert I will look for the sanders culvert on the loop road today
From Georgoulias, Bethany
Sent Tuesday, September 10, 2013 1 31 PM
To Steenhuis, Joanne
Cc Lambe, Brian
Subject RE Maps for S&P Gravel Mine - Newport, Carteret County

No problem, Joanne Brian, maybe you can point out on the map exactly where the ditch lean talked about leads from
Rick Williford's pit? Joanne says she forwarded the email with the maps Otherwise, I need to wait for Jean's input on
this next week I want to make sure we advise the permittee correctly on any restrictions on dewatering
Either way, we're dealing with tidally influenced waters that we can't estimate a 7Q10 (low flow) for Unless Water
Quality feels the gravity flow of dewatering water could negatively impact downstream SA waters because of excessive
dilution or flow velocities, I'm inclined not to specify a flow limit in the cover letter —particularly since he will not be
pumping I still plan to advise him that he should have some method of controlling flow from his BMPs (flashboard riser,
etc ) in the event that flow must be restricted to comply with effluent limits in the permit, and to be consistent with your
recommendations
I'll work with Joanne and Jean to advise other components of an O&M Plan that would be required before he could
dewater We can move forward with the NCG02 Certificate of Coverage, but he'll have to put some kind of 0&M
dewatering plan together that the WiRO can approve One component will likely be delineating wetlands so he knows
where they are, if any Again, I'll check in with Jean on these aspects when she gets back
Sorry this is such a complicated ones Any help on discharge location in the meantime would be helpful
Thanks'
Bethany
Be►ham Georgoulias E-ni n onim n/al f ngim ei
NC DI--NR / DiN ision of Ener-N Mineral and [,and ReIauicL',
Storm%,11L1 Peirnitunig, Piogram
1612 Mail Servict. Ctinti,.i Ralcigh NC 27699-1612
i12 N Salisblli'j Sircet RalciLgh NC 27604
919 / 807-6372 (phone) 919 / 807-6494 ([a\)
WLbN]tL htt 1/portal nedLni 01`1/web/h/5tonn"ater
F nield Cot It %ponde ercc 10 andJiorn this udehLss mat & uihiec,t to the Vorrh ( med a MiNg H curd% bu wed mik he drK.%n3edto thodpurtrLs
From Steenhuis, Joanne
Sent Monday, September 09, 2013 2 24 PM
To Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject RE Maps for S&P Gravel Mine - Newport, Carteret County
Bethany,
I am sorry, but I cannot help you on this as I have only been to look at the stream by the road with Jean I talked with
Jean and she says that Brian Lambe has her file and would probably be your best bet as to locating what you need on the
aerial I will forward your e-mail to him Otherwise you will need to wait for Jean to come back next week, Sorry'
From Georgoulias, Bethany
Sent Monday, September 09, 2013 12 SO PM
To Steenhuis, Joanne
Subject Maps for S&P Gravel Mine - Newport, Carteret County
Hi Joanne,
Poor Jean has talked to me so much about this one, and I'm still Just SO confused about exactly where the dewatering
water drains to It's a ditch that leads somewhere, and I thought it was some part of Goose Creek At issue is that the
area of Goose Creek at the mouth (and east/west along the shore) is ORW, covered under a special ORW rule That rule
says "The only new or expanded NPDES permitted discharges that shall be allowed shall be non -domestic, non -process
industrial discharges "

The last time we talked with her and Jim Gregson about this one, the conclusion was that would prohibit any dredging
dewatering discharge from this mine
BUT, I need to figure out again why she and Jim thought the discharge went to that segment Boyd Devane and I are
struggling with similar mining discharge situations, and we're not sure that unnamed tribs leading into these ORW
waters (or PNA waters) are necessarily restricted by the classification rule In my case, we decided this area drains to
15A 2B 0225 (7)(D) Western Bogue Sound Section
But that rule doesn't include tributaries, only the section itself I've attached two maps One Jean sent me a while back
with the PNA area and the mine shown on it The other is the one I drafted up for the COC, and it shows PNA (yellow)
and ORW (blue) sections highlighted so you can see My biggest question right now is where is the ditch that this guy is
draining his pit to leading? Does it go all the way down to the ORW area, or does it drain into an upper portion of
Goose Creek? Both Jean and Brian confirmed that it doesn't go to Sanders Creek (that's what the application and their
site plan says, but it's wrong — may have been a previous phase of this mine under another owner)
So first priority is to figure out if this really is restricted from dredging WW Second would be whether we ask for
wetlands delineation as part of the O&M Plan, which I will have to remind him he needs approval for before starting to
dewater (again, which he was ordered to stop by DEMLR b/c the mining permit doesn't allow it right now either) Even
if you remember where it was and can just highlight it on the COC map, that would be a HUGE helps
Thanks for any help you can give iiii
Bethany
Bethany Georgouhas Environmental Engineer
NCDENR 1 Division of Energy, Mineral, and sand Resources
Stornwater Permitting Program
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
512 N Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
919 / 807-6372 (phone), 919 / 807-6494 (fax)
Website Imp //portal mdeni or gh� 4ebflr/storinv ater
l marl c or i. spon(i sic. Tel (utd I, Inn lhrs adrhe %$ mai Ili %I&IL C! to the 1 of ih ! arohno 11uhhe & cord% Iem and mij he dise los. d to thud Iuirm %

Conway, Jean
From
Georgoulias Bethany
Sent
Friday July 19 2013 11 19 AM
To
Conway Jean
Cc
Bennett Bradley Gregson Jim
Subject
S&P Sand and Gravel Bogue Pit
Attachments
NCG020845_NOI pdf
Hi Jean,
Thanks again for the discussion on this one today Attached is a copy of the NOI, and I've Just put a copy of the larger site pian in
the interoffice mail we decided
-We can move forward with NCG02 on this one, but we will restrict the conditions/allowable discharges on the Certificate of
Coverage (COC) to prohibit new process wastewater discharges to any ORWs (Basis 2B 0225, Western Bogue Sound Section
that includes Goose Creek and waters draining to] We have done this before, and current General Permit language references
the possibility that a facility's COC will specify which discharges are or are not allowed Further, restrictions on operation will be
addressed in the 0&M Plan that will be approved by the regional office (may need to draw on help from others in DWQ)
-We need additional information from the applicant SPU will work with Jean to request this from Mr Williford This includes
> Wetlands delineation
> More information about proposed operation
> Pumping/Draining O&M Plan for this operation — need to begin working with WiRO on developing this for his site, even if final
approval extends past COC issuance [CO will hold off on issuance until you feel comfortable either with final O&M, or that he's
on the way to developing an acceptable one ]
-Discuss possibility of no dredging discharges with DMLR counterpart and advise/discuss with applicant
-Discharge volumes will be restricted to Sanders Creek because of SA, HQW classification Need a "7Q10 equivalent" low flow
condition estimate because flow limit will apply under the permit, and these are tidally influenced waters WW discharges also
need to be approved by Shellfish Sanitation (Div Marine Fisheries) before we can issue the COC Jean —may need some more
clarification here on what discharges actually flow here, since most of what we talked about today was the gravity flow in the
ditched area leading to the trib of Goose Creek This should also be addressed in O&M
Anything else?
Thanks,
Bethany
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ j Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1617
512 N Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
NEW Website httPJ/Portal rKxfar 9fflA rgO1W i/wslsu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

ConwayJean
From Conway Jean
Sent Friday July 19 2013 9 21 AM
To Georgoulias Bethany
Subject RE S&P Gravel Mine Brunswick County Individual WW permil?
You can call us at 910-796-7339
jean
From Georgoulias, Bethany
Sent Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9 09 AM
To Bennett, Bradley, Gregson, Jim, Belnick, Tom, Poupart, Jeff, Hennessy, John
Cc Conway, Jean
Subject S&P Gravel Mine - Brunswick County, Individual WW permit?
Gentlemen,
We accepted this mining permit application for coverage under NCG02, but there's a wrinkle in moving forward with that that
the Wilmington Regional Office wants to discuss We need to address this before SPU's move over to DEMLR, because the
question that has come up is whether it should be given an Individual wastewater permit from one of the NPDES Units Instead
The Issues
Although the application says they dewater (gravity, but still considered mine dewatering wastewater) into SA, HQW waters,
some of their dewatering flows to a tnb that drorns Into Goose Creek, part of the ORW watershed addressed in a site -specific
ORW strategy in 02B 0225 ((7)(d)) It is part of the Western Bogue Sound Section where the "only new or expanded NPDES
permitted discharges that shall be allowed shall be non -domestic, non -process industrial discharges " Jean reports that the
operator plans to dredge in the future, and that discharge would flow to this trib (which, by our interpretation of these rules, is
not allowed) The WiRO agrees some kind of Pumping/Draining O&M Plan is required for this permit, but currently their
engineer position that would handle it (formerly Linda Willis) is vacant
The mine has been there a long time, but dredging will be an introduction of process wastewater There is also the issue of
SA,HQW that requires an estimate of 7Q10 because of discharge limits
The request
We need to arrange a meeting/conference call to sort out the fate of this permit If it needs to go to one of the NPDES Units
WiRO and SPU need to coordinate with NPDES WW, and WiRO needs direction on what to do next (to advise the permittee)
We also need to know whether to return this NCG02 application or convert it to an individual WW permit
Please let me know when you are available this week or next week to discuss
Thanksl
Bethany
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1617
512 N Salisbury St Raleigh NC 27604
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
NEW Website httpJlporta! ncdenr orglwebhmgL%sisu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
r.Errm
") NCDENR National Pollutant Discharge Fliminatlon System
hearo.C=t>tlt`+(ne,+i;tr
NCG020000
NOTICE OF INTENT
National iPollutant Discharge Elimination System application for,coverage under General Permit
NCGO20000
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as
SIC (Standard Industrial, Classification) Code -14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The following activities are also Included -
• Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits --except for NCDOT borrow posy that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with any overburden, raw material, intermediate
products, finished products byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations
• Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations
• Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater, and/or
• Mine dewatenng (wastewater)
The fotlowinglactivrties are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit
• Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining coal mining, and metal mining,
• Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from asphalt
operations and/or concrete operations
,% Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations and
• Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
• NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150
�i The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000
• Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (t a sand
dredging or dipping operations)
• Please contact the NPDES Wastewater Point -Source Group for more information on coverage under this
permit.
Please print or type all antries- m t is epphcatlon form
1) Mailing address of,ownerloperator (aflicral adc#ress to which atl_permit correspondence wdl be mailed)
Legal Owner Name .5 I �A-Np A-po ���[4 �-. u L-L _
(Attach the most recent Annual Report to the NC Secretary of State showing the current legal name of the corporation or enthy
Alternatively this permit can be given to an individual or government authonty This name must be the same name as appears on thg
t waton of Laird Resources tuning Permit j -
Signee's Name (as signed for to permit signature at bottom)
Street Address D ` ' - -
City Sul R+-513u(L J __ State_±L(L ZIP Code �� S H
Telephone No � 31 3� - 7-5-02 � Email W «�.tFb,2D wwx
Alternate Pontxt Name Vol4UL F 6-C _ _ Y_ Emaii (if different)
Alternate Contact Telephone (if different) Z6'7— - 31
2, 12013
d
fit,
F
f
.1
7

NCG020000 N 0 E
a
i
i
2) Location of facility producing discharge
Facility Name _V� OC11) e P l rt -- _ S A - <,91, A-TJ- (VZ't-Lt_L P) 'A -
FacihtyStreet Address Wo]� re,Uu1'n -- f ISU j3yywC Lov ,Eo"-
-o - -
Fac0ity City tJ � w po r T State � P L ZIP Cade 7,��_7_ d
Facility County C prJ T r yL i-
Facility Contact JC c C�= W taut t_0f t> -
Telephone No z Sz 3 - z Syy_ = � Fax- Z,6Z
Contact E-mail Cy 'r\
3) Physical Location Information
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names state road numbers and )
distance and direction from a roadway Lntersection) 1'tzAkrex.4 t(o- n0GPrSC oA I+L0!j Z`1_ A&)LIr 3
MILE P#45 (W i�_ 60NLQ2_ =_7`. T) �E A- Lff rLJ& DnTu &)&V = uyI' i�Re�� T-AIz f21611r &101 s
4. Latitude 34 ° H L ' qg (af,,�'f it Long etude - 770 ' , Z L-" � - OAR' Pfar 0wheo + �
g Z I {degrees, minutes, seconds) l r r ,
Perm)
5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following
❑ New or Proposed Facility Bate operation is to begin
IA Existing Date began mining l I 1 Z.00(0
6) Standard Industrial Classification
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility
8) Is this mine an inactive mine site?
IN No
❑ Yes If yes do you posses an Inactive Renewal" from DEMLR and notified the DWO Regional Office or
have you certified to the DWQ that the site has been stabibzed? 0 No ❑ Yes
9) Does this facility already have a valid Mining )permit from the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land)Resources
(DEMLR) [formerly DLR)?
❑ No If No, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application
T$ Yes If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number l Z 3, _ Please also provide a
copy of your DEMLR Mining Permit with this DWO application
Note DWQ canna! issue a COC for the NCGO20000 Genera! Permit until a Mining Permit is Issued or
renewed Uk the DEMLR
10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
14 No
3' ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility -�- __-
r

NCG020000 N O 1
11) Are you applying for a mining permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine'7
k
� ❑ No
t4 Yes If yes specify permit number and name if known R,U 5 S e {- M we - P avzh i r 144- rusT- wow&)
12) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex recycle permits)?
P1 No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility
13) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mix and asphalt areas?
® No
❑ Yes if yes, do they have DWQ stormwater permits (if owned by the same company)? ❑ No ❑ Yes
(provide permit number - )
If not owned by the same company, who is the owner
14) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
lCK No
❑ Yes
15) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties and will it add more than 10,000 ft2 of, impervious
surface?
® No
❑ Yes If yes, you may be required to apply for an additional state stormwater permit Check with your
local Regional Office See contact information and checklist below
16) Is this mine tocated the Neuse, Tar-Pamhco, or Catawba River,Basins, or the Randleman or Jordan
Water supply Watersheds
Ill No
❑ Yes If yes, what size stream buffers are included on site? ft Please show buffers in site plans
If yes please include information and plans showing diffuse flow through buffers as required
Discharge Pofltts, Recotv_mi -n Waters & WetlaLi&:
17) Receiving waters
What is the narne of the body or bodies of,wat+§r (creek, sbum, river, Ilake, eW ) that the facihty stormwater
an�lar,wastewaterdi charges ind,up in7 o .Cr: L L r�i-3 f-1 as a ri' rater"
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e g City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer)
Receiving water classification (if known) _.. S�± i (Qw-
Note Discharge of industrial wastewater to receriring waters classified,as WS-11 to WS-v, or SA, must
be approved by the Div, of Water Resources, or Div of Marine Fisheries If DWR or DMlF does
not approve, coverage under NCG020000 cannot be granted No new discharges of wastewater
are permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or freshwaterORW Wastewater
discharges to Saltwater ORW wdl}not'he appro,k ed,under the NCG02 General Perrbit
18) If your facoirty has wastewater f ischarges and they are to HWQ andlor PNA waters (Primary Nursery Areas)
waters, what Is the proposed flow rate? A p tafttLa_vr'iv PP 0111See
http HyAy..rii;drnf'ne ft;jtWFN_A" maosjogi html for map)
F-
i
i
i
r-,

§C
i
I
NCG020000 N O 1
19) discharge Points y
✓- k
Number of discharge points (ditches pipes channels, etc that convey discharges from the property)
Onsite Stormwater D Mine dewatering c7" Process Wastewater Overflow 0 I
Ofts1to Stormwater I Mine dewatering �(� Process Wastewater Overflow U
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan
Please provide short narrative description of discharges _71},+.�OrYL� 0Qr� iL (S
S Lj 't-iL 1.-J 4�'i� ii lY)? OIDYL A—
JV m et r1 -� ' -'*�~ m A{.y A n2 'j -&k_s
_Cj1LMC -, 21 &':e 4VX-X ni> rr
a) Is your mine dewatering and discharging? (Answer only it you are dewaterngj
r
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, where to? _ Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site)
F
Other (on -site or off -site) Describe —
d
b) Are you dewatering but not diischarging7 (Answer only if you are dewatering) '
i
❑ No
❑ Yes If Yes, please explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed
4
20) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
�r
e M No
❑ Yes
Note Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (C}&M) Plan that,has been approved by the
Division
For sites that may drain wetlands -- garoval of a Pumping O&M plan may be required prior to
coverage underithis general permit The Pumping O&M flan should be submitted to the
appropriate Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation
The plan shall include, but is not (�mded to (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance See
checklist at end of document Contact your local Regional Office for questions specific, to your mine
21) If you are dewatering, are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the minle pit perimeter?
C,K-No
❑ Yes If yes, what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter? _-_ __ feet
22) Have you been required to obtain a 4041401 Certification permits?
5Z No
❑ Yes if yes, please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation BMPs setbacks,
»- and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information) Attach other sheets as necessary
4
7

r I
� t
NCG020000 N o 1
9
23) Have you,been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
56 No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission `
r
Stormwater BMPs
24) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control? ;
❑ No 50 Yes If yes, please briefly describe lir L7�i,-Ltr " .*,� �z3 NI}
25) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution, Prev ention Plan?
% No ❑ Yes
If yes when was it implemented?
26) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility?
a No ❑ Yes
Wastewater Treatment Facilities, i
27) Will mine dewatering discharges occur?
f1 No ;
❑ Yes a
r � �
28) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur?
I No S
❑ Yes If yes,
a Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical additive
Vote Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamlde (DAMS) products for use in North Carolina
http (/portal ncdenr orglweb/wglwslsuinpdessw
i
b Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr 24-hr rainfall event?
❑ No ❑ Yes '
29) Are wastewater treatment facli ies (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
k No
❑ Yes
i
30) Is your facility washing mined materials? ;W
No
r
❑ Yes if Yes are you discharging this water?
a
t >

NCO020000 N O t
_i
Other.
31) Hazardous Waste
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage, or Disposal Facility?
M No ❑ Yes
,b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
>j No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
MNO El Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b or c , please provide the following information
Type(s) of waste
How is material stored
Where is material stored -- - `--
How many disposal shipments per year
Name of transport / disposal vendor _
Vendor address
32) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? See permits
text for secondary containmenf requirements Or
,❑ No
❑ 4Yes
33) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
g No
❑ Yes If yes, specify type ❑ LCID ❑ Other
Final Checklist.
T l Will be to ad a i c 1 all.of tMi full in iGa s 1 e rid
initialed for Please,show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each
space below
✓ _ Fee of $100 made payable to NCDENR
Completed application and all supporting documents
`✓ Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status
Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows theimining site and nearest major roads
vl Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands and other waters etc
�l 2 copies of large-scale (minimum 24 x 36") site plan with topographical lines with all outfalls, applicable
,buffers and wetlands clearly dallhreated, aaPd 100--,year flood plain line If applieabte
` A copy df your'DEMLR mining`permit.
Nt A copy of your US Army Corps -approved wetland delineation if you markgd "yes to question 23 above
✓ A line drawing of the water flow through the facility A pictorial description of the nature and amount of any
sources of water rand,any coltecbon and treatment measures
''lf mine It$ is in one of the Z0 Coastal Gtrat�lh�.
4: Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State
Stormwater permit Regional Office Contact _i,(O-LL
L
I
'L
a

NCG020000 N O (
• Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages, sub drainage
areas and total drainage area
If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater,
include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping OW Plan (see below
for contact information) You may be required to provide an approved Pumping O&M Phan priorto
NCG02 issuance
2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans (at least 24" x 36") delineating areas on the plans and trstr�
acr_ ease (including wetlands, ditches well -placements, pits borrow areas, overburden storage,
stormwater controls/BMPs, vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins product process (such as
screening stockpiles waste piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (If state sw
programs apply), applicable buffers, and access and/or haul roads)
Pump dewatering size and information on its specifications
Well information (design, depths, maintenance)
Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas
Settling pond sizing information, if applicable
Level spreader design If applicable
Details about dewatering method
Cone of Influence calculations
Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding
Description & information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained.
Copy of US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if
applicable)
I have contacted my local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan
Regional Office Contact Date contacted
-OR-
f _�,_ I will not any impact nearby wetlands, surface waters or groundwater by dewatering
Certification North Carolina General Statute 143-216 6 b (i) provides that
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or certification in any application record report, plan or other
l
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a Motenal fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article or who falsifies tampers with or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
f`
(Environmental ivlanagementl Commtssion implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Glass 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10 000) , w
33) Signatory Requirements (per 40 CFR r122 22) e
Ail applications reports or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certrfiad
a All notices of intent to be covered under this General Permit shall be signed as follows
(1) For a corporation by a responsible corporate officer for the purpose of this permil a responsible corporate officer means (a) a president ,
secretary treasurer or vice president of the corporation In charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar ;
policy or decision making functions for the corporation or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities
employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars) if
authority to sign Oocuments has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship by a general partner or the proprietor respectively, or
(3) For a municipality state federal or other public agency by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected ofctat
_ i
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit I understand that coverage under this permit will
constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual,
permit
-
I agree to ablde by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit k
r
1 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining PerMit for this mining activity (A copy of the valid mining
permit must be attached to this request

NCG020000 N O 1
2 l agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPOES permit specifically issued therefore
3 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection
so as to contain all spills on the seta
4 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N C statutes and rules governing
solid waste disposal
5 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not
result in contamination of the surface or ground waters
agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete and accurate
Panted Name of Person Signing 0_VrA&LF$_ (Z . to l t.L I C-0P—n_
`title OLOi-\ v_Y�— I U fl c
1<71
(Signature of Applrca (D e 5rgn d)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for$100 made payable to NCDENR
Mail the entire package to
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mad Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit
For questions, please contact the ©WQ Regional Office for your area—
e lonal'Offlce Contact Info Mon
Asheville Office
Fayetteville Office
Mooresville Office
Raleigh Office
Washington Office
Wilmington Office
Winston-Salem
Central Office
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
(919) 7914200
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

CA201206701039
t a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL
NAIVE OF LIMITED LLABIL1 Y COMPANY S & P Sand and Gravel, LLC
Date Filed 3/7/2012 3,30 00 PM
Elaine F Marshap '
North Carolina Secretary of State
SECRETARY OF STATE ID NUMBER 0848370 STATE OF FORMATION NC Farg o b0*
REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2012
SECTION A
D charges
1 NAME OF REGISTERED AGENT Treve B Lumsden
2 SIGNATURE OF THE, NEW REGISTERED AGENT
SrONATURE CONSTITUTES CONSENT TO THE APPOINTMENT
3 REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS COUNTY 4 REGISTERED OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
8752 Reed Drive, Suite 3 8752 Reed Drive, Suite 3
Emerald isle, NC 28594 Carteret Emerald Isle NC 28594
SECTION B
1 IDESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS Excavating
2 PRINCIPAL OFFICE PRONE NUMBER [phone] 3 PRINCIPAL OFFICE EMAIL _
4 PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS S COUNTY 6 PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
308 VFW Road 308 VFW Road
Swansboro, NC 28564 Onslow Swansboro, NC 28584
SECTION C (Enter additional ManagerslMernberslOrganlzers in Section E )
NAME Charles R Williford NAME William K Page
TITLE Manager TITLE Manager/Member
NAME
TITLE
ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS
P O Box 1436 308 Vfw lioad
Swansboro, NC 28584 _ Swansboro, NC 28584
L
SECTION D Section D must be completed In Its entirety by a persoMbusiness entity
1 / - i
SIGNATURE - - _ DATE
Patin must be afgond by a Mam*er/Member Itsted udder Section C of thto form
•
Pnnt or Ty" Name of ManspeNrdember 4V� � YMC
THIS ENTITY DOES NOT DUALII=Y FOR THE 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FZI.IND FEE EXEMPTION GRANTED UNDER SQDIO31
MAIL TO Saorwtery d State, OcMomticna Drylsron Post Ofte Box 2RS25 R"h NO 27628.0525
a..

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G S 7446 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to
Rick Williford
S&P Sand and Gravel, LLG Mine
Carteret County -Permit-No 16-23
for the operation of a
Sand Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration
14AI 1 ,d 'ERMIT- Pi O �DAT o -7 2016
i
r

Y •-
�� ftr 1 4t! } t r `k, s, ♦ . � `S1 1 } t�,�+� C rti ,. i1:-
���'�
r i�.r yrr '�C•'1'�•g 3' �� + s*L i� fR f r � r y� i r 1 ��,
41rL't.l'.ff £
�sy��`Is,�'��a,�y���
' y 11q� 'Trj'� 4 ~ ,y. ;-s ; r�•+� 6, e� �P'h'{L'�.UN
.•1x'°�Jl�•f�t�{tr+-ra
i. I`C'-3 ;t rz' `'• 7 .�t' i 1 r - : V^'i.: p• Irf+ f 4 r t 1
i l�l, Ye.h.�R L'�fi ��fal','�, � � F, •5�., X.�,• s�. i�z'�59 }�f� �'r�#E'�•r` ��i'�s�5
l�i}Yrl4F rf
��, r�, 5„��� �1 AGi; ail ` � f�1•iY+ i �, ,. i -F F i 1+�,� �� `,,�•I' �1 {Iy �r
�:���ti.'4.�Sg+ erE w. r! ��,x����'9t �1• ��.� F� y� �ti.G-r7�1�:1 �y{. �"�?•ti ��:
L.tld1k 1Jrr�►� ',•d.} . ^y1SSY,f
. } ��•1:,4,Y L Rf�,P ��� •'•,f�•. -.; r; s(�3 �• �-t.�,
y 'j-9 � 1 ��1 �3',�pt'1��1� % i 7a v r � •� ��1 • �..�!° Iv k yr, � i�' "�'� ,� rt� 1 r ' .t �,
li Irk} rl}}+ og "C, i}AAt r•.. arY* F, � t ��+�+gW E ���• r drl kG- '+� ¢ t_ l+ . rr�if , Ft wlt
�+•' S r �� r} ' ' 1g•,fcji,} � i 1 r'!iR> tisi''°yla .S►' s - !;'t r• i ,i
y� [ 'f s �{ ". .► `
r .. .. t � r ! y F k £ t ' xr r •n for � �'" a , ;� g � ,:�
.rr4 •'Syt,�s; rr r[� � f�d y �.lIL i:p s`u, f• t 6i� �. �� ! � ,I] •Sii t.r �, }�� .!
5k�"3r'l4�"Y3+SCri�r?ySi5:i�:J IYaI!rr zJ;
�' 4�l.ti�� �•�;. z, y��r �,:� dt� ' I�"�:i,� , :; LL�k lr�- �'�r• �z ��' `t��3.� ,��#��ti"�?�'y
h Ir! r 6 A �1 C F•' >� . �PS� T 7 1 `�qh L.. +1 F r ? ''Cr',y'Sv ii r u �.
E,k.1.:o-
A r �»�t.'>'•..• r ,,x�4.! *t�� ':� 1 � rw r: + �t'f rEi+ sS,r I ��S ��SZ•
I h 11
{'a I tiff 1 w 'r sFy w��4sy • k r+ i di "• `i
..y>�.1�
� �/,(y,.*r•.a.5 e- r�, � x.%:�'L Y. �a.• r ••1� Fr1 ��x_. 4' t ,r `a�•'",. . ti
;��j�l�f{YH�i�I 9F.11 `}'�iy�3y����Ml��`�_ � :Y 'i ,4'T?Yf� �5� {�F����� /x •.���'i� �Y:`•
j-�.Ir yr ilxK- _'��,-M1Y.h t 3"i [T•S" tit ,,x+.
Am`kti5•. +' r
ii:5.
:kwa[:'rs,�',y°�'i�ly,. ''- �:yyy i fF..a �I��, u�i�r4''E5�-.��� �r.t' I..r."� y ;4•r; �t� �:
��'�•1." �••.�•:.ty-,ri.-��tl� �j+y��'r�l`-1�,!� �i�,�l •1 � +�'.5•i � �'-} • day r r `„'yr����� •. ��:
Fst,}, �,•Y���j�. .��t,__.�t �•'+fiiY+T
.��� � C •1�1,~ � x ;5 "r +l rr rh �N+" r =T r
�� ��� �r�� �r-cr++"r '4�y�N�lylti�{ w1 {t�'w��:,swar) ISM^pi. 554�'I•%;}.c.��4 �.r

MSRMaps Page 1 of 1
: I wy&)Ma FM I Fanrnis plxes I wen sees I neoA I DUIp Maps
Swrch MSR Mops
s�aac ►� t�el►�anvlhlQp a 1�m NR or [� cam#. taaM �foglu, uidLea staeas 71��
_ DawAk" 19 mill I info I print I Ord
pq �. rum rapo MOP
Mpa m"Sim
OIR
n goaen it iflgs Q
F
'1ma4�murt�fY afMCU.S fiCHoPlpl SvrveY III � �¢6 _.�
Source-256883 Running Time 62 SO MS
D IO1D Mkraso4[Qr1lwrWnIT4Vt�a![lsq�!'rlwey Su(�eeevwt�5pva{w�d uy MM� iI.I bing
� IIG�G 1A.11
http //msrmaps corrdimage a5px9T=2&S=12&Z=18&X=395&Y=4803&W=3&qs=%7ccape 4/2/2013

MSRMaps Pnnt Page 1 of 1
I
9
u T a " Image courtesy of the U S Geological Survey
Q 2010 Microsoft Corporation Terms of Use Privacy Statement
F
http Ymstmaps com/Prztitlmage aspx2T=2&S=13&Z=18&X�-197&Y=2401&W�-2&qs—% 4/22/2013

a
Conway, Jean
From
Conway Jean
Sent
Thursday February28 2013 9 43 AM
To
Bennett Bradley Vinson Scott
Cc
Dumpor Samir Gregson Jim
Subject
RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Sorry for the delayed response, f have been out sick the last few days but I appreciate you all lending a hand with this one
I think getting them under the General permit and applying the more stringent monitoring (TSS and Fecal) requirements for HQW, SA
and PNA waters under the permit conditions would be appropriate in this case but where it gets tricky is trying to determine the volume of
flow so as not to exceed the 50 percent of total in stream flow of the receiving waters under 7Q10 conditions In this case the majority of the
flow may be coming from the mine discharge itself
I appreciate any assistance and guidance on this on
I will give Scott a call today to try and set up a site visit
Thanks, Jean
Original Message
From Bennett, Bradley
Sent Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3 08 PM
To Vinson, Scott, Conway, Jean
Cc Dumpor, Samir
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Scott,
I m not sure that it would need an individual permit The 2009 revision of the permit included specific requirements for SA and ORW areas,
so most often we can work through this in the GP Of course there are always going to be situations, like Vanceboro, where different
coverage is more appropriate
BB
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Unit Phone [phone]
NC Divtsion of Water Quality 1 Fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Email bradley bennett®ncdenr gov
Raleigh, NC 27699 1617 Web http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws/su
Emad correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties
Original Message
From Vinson, Scott
Sent Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2 56 PM
To Conway, Jean, Bennett, Bradley
Cc Dumpor, Samir
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Jean,
We are more than glad to join you in a site visit to help discuss the discharge and all the options available to the owner, but because this mine
discharges into SA, ORW, then it is most likely to need an individual NPDES SW discharge permit according to a May 11, 2007 Memo for
Permitting Policy of NCG02 & NCG 14 and also a newer 20 l I Memo drafted by Linda Willis to be from Cindy Karoly addressing permitting
of NCG02 & NCG 14 discharging into PNA & SA waters Because this particular mine will need an individual permit, it would be most
helpful if we can also get one of our smartest and brightest coworkers from Central office to join us on site as well Bradley is there someone
who you might be able to send down to meet with us and the owner-7
Bradley, Samir and I are not entirely sure whatever came of this last 2011 memo and whether or not it was ever signed or not by Cindy If so,
could you email us a copy?
Jean,
Just to get started with setting a date, are there 2 3 days over the next 2 weeks that would work for you to visit the site, if so we can look over
our schedules and see what day works best for everybody?
Thanks,
Scott
Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment

M *E mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties
unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation
Original Message
From Conway, Jean
Sent Friday, February 22, 2013 8 48 AM
To Vinson, Scott
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Hay Scott,
This site is only an hour or so from the Washington office Let me know if you can lend your expertise on a site visit for this one 1 have been
tagging along with Linda Willis and have done some easy ones by myself but could use all the help I can get
You can call me at 910 796 7339 to discuss or see if someone else in your office wants to take this one with me
Thanks, Jean
Original Message
From Bennett, Bradley
Sent Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10 33 AM
To Vinson, Scott
Cc Conway, Jean, Sullivan, Shelton, Gregson, Jim, Adams, Amy
Subject FW S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Scott,
Here is one of the Mine Dewatering issues I mentioned at the meeting in Wilmington last week I think the experience with the dewatering
issues from the WARO could help some in Wilmington right now if you guys could work in a site visit to a few of these with WIRO staff
Jean will probably contact you on this one and see if you or someone else in your region is available to go to the site with them Depending
on thf. day/time selected maybe we will be able to come down as well
BB
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Una I Phone [phone]
NC Division of Water Quality I Fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center I Email bradley bennett@ncdenr gov
Raleigh, NC 27699 1617 I Web http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws/su
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties
Original Message
From Sulhvan, Shelton
Sent Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10 34 AM
To Bennett, Bradley
Subject FW S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
You think someone in SPU can accompany Jean?
Shelton Sullivan
NCDENR I Division of Water Quality I Wetlands & Stormwater Branch Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater Compliance. and Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 1617
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Email shelton sullivan@ncdenr gov
Website http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
- Original Message -
From Conway, Jean
Sent Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9 45 AM
To Sullivan, Shelton

.—Subject S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Shelton,
I have sent an NOV 2013 PC 0035 to S&P Sand and Gravel for dewatenng w/out our NCG02 permit and the owner would like to set up a
site visit to discuss the discharge Would you or someone from Raleigh be able to accompany me on this one and help out with some
technical guidance?
The site is in Carteret Co (see attached map) l am new to the mine review process and with Linda gone, I am getting more of these
coming to me It is somewhat similar to the Carter mine in that it is a discharge to a UT to Bogue Sound (SA,HQW) but there is no actual
pumping The discharge is gravity fed through a S&EC device into a tributary to Goose Creek Branch that flows to Bogue Sound
Give me a call if you want to discuss 910 796 7339 Thanks, Jean
Note h mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties

Conway Jean
From Rick Williford [wilhfordnck@yahoo com]
Sent Tuesday February 05 2013 10 26 AM
To Conway Jean
Subject S & P Sand and Gravel Mine
Ms Conway,
Per our conversation on the phone this morning, I am confirming our discussion regarding the notice of
violation and our intent to schedule a meeting on -site to discuss and determine the correct resolution I am
awaiting your proposed schedule time and date Please let this e-mail represent my written reply to the notice
dated 1/29/13 My understanding is that I now wait for your reply on a date and time and no further immediate
action is required on my part
Thanks
Rick Williford
Sunland Builders Inc
PH [phone]
FAX [phone]

Conway,Jean
From ' Conway Jean
Sint Monday February 11 2013 4 12 PM
To Sullivan Shelton
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
I have not scheduled a meeting with Mr Williford yet This week is pretty full for me but maybe we can set up a day next week or
the week after What does your calendar look like?
From Sullivan, Shelton
Sent Monday, February 11, 2013 3 58 PM
To Conway, Jean
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Hey lean
Just talked with Elizabeth in Planning and agree that the UT in this case is SA HQW Sorry to confuse things But have
you had this meeting's Or what is the status?
Thanks
Shelton Sullivan
NCDE NR I Division of Water Qu thty I Wetlands & Stormwater Br inch
Wetlands Buffers Stormwater Compliance ind Permitting Unit
1617 (Wail ServieL Center Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Email shelton Sullivan@nedenr gov
Wtbsite http /!portal nedenr org/web/wq/ws
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties
iA P[4- tsc contiidcr the Ln%ironmcnt bcforc printing this em tie
From Sullivan, Shelton
Sent Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1 23 PM
To Conway, Jean
Subject RE S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
I think: someone from the SPU of myself should go I forwarded to the SPU staff as well I
think UT's to SA waters are classified as "C" But the ut will discharge to the SA at some
point Just depends on which one below
SECTION 0300 - ASSIGNMENT OF STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS
15A NCAC 02B 0301 CLASSIFICATIONS GENERAL
(i) Unnamed Streams
(1) Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as
that assigned to the stream segment to which it is tributary except
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications, or
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C", or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class
SA waters by approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case
reclassification proceedings are conducted

Sheltoit- Sullivan
NCDENR I Division of Water Quality C Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater Compliance and Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Email Shelton Sullivan ncdenr Gov
Website http //Portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
0 Please consider the environment before printing this email
-----Original Message -----
From Conway, lean
Sent Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9 45 AM
To Sullivan, Shelton
SubJect S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Shelton,
I have sent an NOV 2013-PC-0035 to S&P Sand and Gravel for dewatering w/out our NCG02
permit and the owner would like to set up a site visit to discuss the discharge Would you or
someone from Raleigh be able to accompany me on this one and help out with some technical
guidance?
The site is in Carteret Co (see attached map) I am new to the mine review process and
with Linda gone, I am getting more of these coming to me It is somewhat similar to the
Carter mine in that it is a discharge to a UT to Bogue Sound (SA,HQW) but there is no actual
pumping The discharge is gravity fed through a S&EC device into a tributary to Goose Creek
Branch that flows to Bogue Sound
Give me a call if you want to discuss 910-796-7339 Thanks, Jean
Note E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
2

l
'r
CERTIFIEbMAIL. RECEIPT
..mestic man bmy; ovo insurance coverage Provided)
r� Fier delivery Inforniation visit our weliksite at www.usps.com"
m
g OFFS CIAL USE
-
m
�` Postage $
m
Certified Fee
ru
Ratun� Receipt Fee Postmark
C3(Endomm r t Required) Here
Restdrim Delivery Fee � )
(Endorgr,, it Required)
� TOttrl Paetage &Fees
$ it J'Id JJJJ
r�
'07 t M
ar PO Sax No
crry to zrp«Form
DO Auqost 2666
C/

■ Complete items 1 2 and 3 Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you
■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece
or on the fr'nnt If space permits
1 Article Addressed to
d
A
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
Received by (Prr d Name G Date of Delivery
D 1s delivery address di fdent from item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES enter delivery address below ❑ No
3 Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ egistered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C 0 D
4 Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2 Article Number
(Transfer from service label) 7008 1140 0002 3401 3? 7 2
PS Form 3811 February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595 02 M 1540

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First Class Mail
Postag
USPSe &Fees Paid
Permit No G-10
• Sender Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this lax •
NC DENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION
127 CARDINAL DRIVE DffENSiON
WILMimGTON NC 28405
/ e I?_ cf:2--

1
MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P E John Skvarla
Governor Director Secretary
January 29 2013
Rick Williford CERTIFIED MAIL #7008 1140 0002 3401 3772
S&P Sand Gravel Mine RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
4846-A Highway 24
Newport NC 28570
Subject NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV 2013-PC-0035
S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Operating without a Stormwater Permit
Carteret County
Dear Sir
On January 17, 2013 staff of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Wilmington Regional Office
conducted a site visit at the S&P Sand Gravel Mine (Division of Land Resources (DLR) Mining Permit
#16-63) and observed a discharge from the mine site to surface waters without the approved General
Stormwater Permit NCG020000 for mining operations
A file review reveals there has been no application received by DWQ and there has been no
permit issued for this mine The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program was
established by the federal Clean Water Act (1972) and then delegated to the Division of Water Quality for
implementation in North Carolina The NPDES Phase I permitting program for stormwater discharges
was established in 1990 Phase I focused on site and operation planning to reduce pollutant sources
One of the industries regulated through NPDES permits is mining activities under the standard industrial
code 1442
As a result of the site visit and file review, the following violation, detailed below is noted
Operating a facility without an NPDES stormwater permit
It is illegal to operate certain industrial plants without a permit under North Carolina General
Statute (NCGS) 143-215 1(a) Illegal operation is subject to civil penalties of up to $25 000 per
day according to NCGS 143-215 6A (a) (2) NPDES general permit NGG020000 has been
established pursuant to NCGS 143-215 1(b) for discharges of stormwater to surface waters This
general permit is applicable to owners or operators of stormwater point source discharges
associated with activities classified as establishments primarily engaged in mining
The S&P Sand Gravel Mine was operating at the time of inspection and a discharge was
observed from the mine pit into a tributary to Goose Creek Branch classified as SA,HQW
A Notice of Violation issued by the Division of Land Resources, dated December 17, 2012,
requested that you apply for an NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG020000 to allow the
discharge of Stormwater, mine dewatering wastewater, and process wastewater to surface
waters of North Carolina No application has been received by the Division of Water
Quality
127 Cardinal Drive i xWnsion Wilmington North Caroint 12840.) 3845
Phone [phone] i 511,ax 910 350 2004 \ Customer Service 1 877 623 6748
Internet mi%w newateroual0 org
NorthCarohna
Nahmall�r
An Equal Opportunity\ Atfirmatne Action Fniplo\er

Rick Williford - S& I Sand Gravel Mine
January 29, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Requested Response
This Office requests that you respond to this letter in writing within 10 days of receipt of this Notice Your
response should be sent to the Wilmington Regional Office at 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington
NC 28405 Your response should address the following items
1 Please explain why you have been operating a facility without a General Stormwater Permit
2 If you plan to conduct mining operations that include a discharge to surface waters you are
requested to apply for an individual NPDES Permit for wastewater discharge from the mine pit
3 Enclosed is an application form, also called a Notice of Intent Please return this form with the
application fee within the next 10 working days from receipt of this letter to
Mr Bradley Bennett
Stormwater & General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Thank you for your attention to this matter This office requires that the violations, as detailed above,
be abated immediately These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty
assessment of up to $26,000 00 per day for each violation Should you have any questions regarding
these matters please contact Jean Conway or myself at 910-796-7215
Sincerely
JarssHH Gregson
Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure NCG20 Inspection Report —Carteret Co
NOI NPDES General Permit
cc DWQ WiRO — NCG020 Carteret Co
DWQ CO NPDES Stormwater Permitting Unit (Bradley Bennett)
DWQ Central Files (w/o att)
DLR WiRo
.P

Site Inspection Report
Site Number
WT000991
Site Name
S&P Sand Gravel Mine
Site Address
Bogue Loop Rd
County
Carteret
Directions
34 710044 -77 004998
Latitude
+34°42 36
Site Owner Name
Williford Rick
Inspection Date
01/17/13
Reason for Inspection Routine
Inspection Type Site Inspection (non -DOT)
Inspection Contact Person
On Site Representative(s)
Primary Inspector Jean Conway
Secondary Inspector(s)
Facility compliance Status 0 Compliant
Program Area NPDES SW - Industrial
Question Areas
® Failure to Secure NPDES SW Permit
Inspection Summary
Region Wilmington
Longitude 7790018
® Not Compliant
Phone
Phone [phone]
Failure to Secure NPDES SW Permit
Does the site have a NPDES Industrial Stormwater Permit?
Comment Discharge observed into tributary to Goose Creek from mine site
No NPDES permit for this facility on file
Page 1

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1 MINE NAME S & P Sand and Gravel Mine 2 MINING PERMIT # 16-23
3 OPERATOR Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS 4846-A Highway 24, Newport NC 28570
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 1 117116 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
$ Person(s) contacted at site none
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures? ® Yes ❑ No
11 Date last inspected 3/22/10 12 Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes N No
If no, explain Operating condition 4A Adequate mechanical barriers (sediment traps) not maintained
Construction entrance not installed
OC 4B All drainage from mine area is not diverted to pit See 4C
OC 4C No dewatering activities shall occur at this site The mine permit is in contradiction with DWQ
permits (to be verified) and with mine map Significant flow at sediment trap location
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes N No
If no, explain Bond cancelation notice received No reclamation has begun Bond deadline 12/4/12
Reclamation Condition 1 Mine area has not been restored to a lake, slopes have not been suitably_
graded and stabilized
RC2A The area is to be a lake area However, the outlet of the pit does not allow for a lake to form
RC213 Slopes have not been graded to final condition Q vertical to 1 horizontal)
RC2C Stockpiles have not been leveled and smoothed
RC3 Reve etation has not occurred
RC4 Reclamation has not occurred
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? N Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage Slight amount of dirt in road
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
1 Immediately bei7in reclamation procedures includma cradinp- slopes to a 3 1. orovidin
groundcover on all bare areas Else_wise, reinstate the bond immediate])
2 Provide detail of sediment traps to be reconstructed Show dimensions materials calculations
3 Install sediment traps upon approval
4 Install construction entrance
5 Revise hermit to include dewaterine You do not have a NPDES dewateringpermit either This
needs to be rectified
17 Other recommendations and comments
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
Not in file Last report l have is 2005 Enclosed form Raleigh central office should mail this
to you every year Enclosure is Est so you know what to look for
19 Follow-up inspection needed? E Yes 0 No Proposed date Jan 2013

20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report I
21 Copy of Report sent to operator] 1 / 16/2012
INSPECTED BY Brian Lamb,
Telephone No 910-796-7314 Brian Lambe@ncdenr gov
DATE 11/15/2012
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

�Aajf'A
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Tracy Davis, PE, CPM Land Quality Section Beverly Eaves Purdue, Governor
Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
December 17 2012
NOTICE OF VIOLATION FOR MINING WITHOUT A PERMIT
CERTI['lED MAIL7011 0110 0000 9947 4714
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Rick Williford
4846-A Highway 24
Newport, NC 28570
RE Revoked Mining Permit No 16-23
S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Carteret County, White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr Williford
This is to inform you that you and/or vour firm arelis violating the Mining Act of 1971 by operating a
mine without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statutes (ht.reinafter NCGS) 74-46, et seq ,
as amended
On December 17 2012 personnel of this office inspected a mining operation being undertaken on
Bogue Loop Road, Cape Carteret Carteret County Personnel of this office have also determined that
Rick Williford is the operator of this mine The area affected at the site by minim -related activities was
measured to be 26 12 acres in size A Notice of Deficiency was received by your office on November
20, 2012 regarding deficiencies in the mine permit and the bond cancellation °
A bond cancellation notice was issued on November 2 2012 by Judith Wehner Assistant State Mining
Specialist T he deadline to reinstate or replace the bond was December 4 2012 Failing to reinstate the
bond by this deadline automatically revokes the mining permit(G S 74-50(c)) All mining activities
should cease and reclamation actions should commence immediately You are currently minim; without
a permit
Pursuant to G S 74-50 of the Mining Act of 1971 no person may operate a mine without first obtaining
a mining permit and also posting a bond to ensure that the site is reclaimed Mining is defined by NCGS
74-49 as
Wilmington Regional office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 3845 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]

Nonce of Violations for Mining without a Penniit
Rick Williford
December 17, 2012
Page 2of3
Fhe breaking of the surface in order to facilitate or accomplish the extraction or removal of minerals,
ores, or other solid matter,
Any activity or process constituting all or part of a process for the extraction or removal of minerals,
ores, soils and other solid matter from its original location and/or
The preparation washing cleaning, or other treatment of minerals, ores or other solid matter so as to
make them suitable for commercial, industnal, or construction use
"Minerals" means anv soils, clay, coal stone, gravel, sand, phosphate rock metallic ore and any other
solid material or Substance of commercial value found in natural deposits on or in the earth (NCGS 74-
49(6))
Because you are in violation of the Mining Act of 1971 you are directed to immediately halt the above
mentioned mini nuo ivration until you have obtained a valid mining permit from this Department
Please contact this office immediately at
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Eat
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
to indicate your intention to comply with the Act In addition, you must take the following corrective
actions to bring this site into compliance
rile the attached application for a permit, including a reclamation plan within 30 days of your
receipt of this Notice
? In the event that your application for a permit is approved, you must post a bond or other form of
security acceptable to the Department to ensure that the affected area will be reclaimed when your
mining operation has terminated Fhe bond does not have to be submitted concurrent with the
application for a permit
3 You must take the following corrective actions to restore or repair any damage that has resulted
from your unlawful mining activity
a The sediment traps should be clearly defined on the application Size and give details
regarding the sediment traps Pending application decision, install sediment traps
b Install construction entrance
c, Apply for a NPDES dewatering permit through NC Division of Water Quality
Or

Notice of Violations for Mining without a Permit
Rick Williford
December 17, 2012
Page 3 of 3
4 As an alternative to filing the attached mining permit application, you must immediately initiate
reclamation of this site and complete the reclamation within 90 days of receipt of this Notice
Should you choose this alternative, you must submit within 30 days of receipt of this Notice a plan
detailing; the intended reclamation including a specific schedule for completion of this work
Violations of the Mining Act for mining without a permit are subject to a civil penalty of up to $5,000 00
per day for each day of a continuing violation A penalty may be assessed for violations committed
prior to your receipt of this notice A penalty will be assessed for violations committed after receipt of
this Notice Should you fail to comply with the terms of this Notice within the prescribed time frames,
additional enforcement action will betaken Such action may result in the issuance of an injunction or
the imposition of a criminal penalty
The responsibility for understanding and complying with the requirements of the Act rests upon the
individuals and firms who are subject to its requirements A copy of the Act and the Administrative
Rules is enclosed for your information
The subject site will not be considered in compliance with the Act until you have obtained a valid
mining permit and/or satisfactorily completed the required reclamation work
Please do not hesitate to contact either Brian Lambe or me regarding any questions You might have on
this matter
Sincercly,
C
Daniel Sams, PF, ME'
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Attachments Iwo Mining Permit Applications
I he Mining Act of 1971
NCAC Trice 15A Chapter 5
cc Ms lanet Boyer, PE
Linda Willis, DWQ

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
I MINE NAME S & P Sand and Gravel Mine 2 MINING PERMIT # 16-23
3 OPERATOR Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS 4846-A Highway 24, Newport, NC 28570_ _
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 12/3/12 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
8 Person(s) contacted at site none
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures? Z Yes ❑ No
11 Date last inspected 3/22/10 12 Any mining since last inspection? 0 Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permits ❑ Yes ® No
if no, explain Operating condition 4A Adequate mechanical barriers (sediment traps) not maintained
Construction entrance not installed
OC 413 All drainage from mine area is not diverted to pit See 4C
OC 4C No dewatering activities shall occur at this Site The mine permit is in contradiction with DWQ
permits (to be verified) and with mine map Significant flow at sediment trap location
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Ycs ®No
If no, explain Bond cancelation notice received No reclamation has bea,.un Bond deadline 12/4/12
Reclamation Condition 1 Mine area has not been restored to a lake. slopes have not been suitably
graded and stabilized
RC2A 'I he area is to be_a lake area However, the outlet of the pit doc,s not allow for a lake to form
RC213 Slopes have not been gLaded to final condition Q vertical to 1 horizontal
RC2C Stockpiles have not been leveled and smoothed
RC3 Revegetation has not occurred__
RC4 Reclamation has not occurred
IS Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage" ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage Slight amount of dirt in road
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
l Immediately beein reclamation procedures includini; aradm2 slooes to a 3 1. movidm
groundcover on all bare areas Elsewise, reinstate the Fond immediately
2 Provide detail of sediment traps to be reconstructed Show dimensions, materials, calculations
3 Install sediment traps upon approval ._
4 Install construction entrance
5 Revise permit to include dewaterw2� You do not have a NPDES dewaterma permit either This
needs to be rectified
17 Other recommendations and comments
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (ENplain) ® Not Reviewed
Not in file

19 Follow-up inspection needed � ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date Jan 2013
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Repo t 1 21 Copy of Report sent to operator12/17/2012
INSPECTED BY Brian Lambe DATE 12/17/2012
Telephone No 910-796-7 514 M ncdenr gov
Copv to File Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

+ � 4 Y
'��r� `i
•
� CDEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Tracy Davis, PE, CPM Land Quality Section Beverly Eaves Purdue Governor
Director Dee Freeman Secretary
December 17, 2012
NOTICE OF VIOLATION FOR MINING WITHOUT A PERMIT
CERTIFIED MAIL701 l 0110 0000 9947 4714
RF"TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Rick Williford
4846-A Highway 24
Newport, NC 28570
RE Revoked Mining Permit No 16-23
S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
Carteret County, White Oak River Bann
Dear Mr Williford
This is to inform you that you and/or your firm are/is violating the Mining Act of 1971 by operating a
mine without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statutes (hereinafter NCGS) 74-46 et seq ,
as amended
On December 17, 2012 personnel of this office inspected a mining operation being undertaken on
Bogue loop Road, Cape Carteret, Carteret County Personnel of this office have also determined that
Rick Williford is the operator of this mine The area affected at the site by mining -related activities was
measured to be 26 12 acres in size A Notice of Deficiency was received by your office on November
20, 2012 regarding deficiencies in the mine permit and the bond cancellation
A bond cancellation notice was issued on November 2 2012 by Judith Wehner, Assistant State Mining
Specialist I he deadline to reinstate of replace the bond was December 4, 2012 hailing to reinstate the
bond by this deadline automatically revokes the mining permit(G S 74-50(c)) All mining activities
should cease and recldmdtion actions should commence immediately You are currently mining without
a permit
Pursuant to G S 74-50 of the Mining Act of 1971, no person may operate a mine without first obtaining
a mining permit and also posting a bond to ensure that the site is reclaimed Mining is dcfint'd by NCGS
74-49 as
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext Wilmington North Carolina 28405 3845 Phone [phone] / FAX [phone]

Notice of Violations for Mining without a Pernut
Rick Williford
December 17, 2012
page 2of3
the breaking of the surface in oider to facilitate of accomplish the extraction or removal of minerals,
ores, or other solid matter,
Any activity or process constituting ail or part of a process for the extraction or removal of minerals,
ores, soils and other solid matter from its original location, and/oi
1 he preparation washing, cleaning, or other treatment of minerals ores or other solid matter so as to
make them suitable for commercial, industrial, or construction use
"Minerals" means any soils, clay, coal, stone, gravel, sand, phosphate, rock metallic ore, and any other
solid mates sal or substance of commercial value found in natural deposits on or in the earth (NCGS 74-
49(6))
Because you are in violation of 7 he Mining Act of 1971 you are directed to immediately halt the above
mentioned minim operation until you have obtained a valid mining pennit from this Department
Please contact this office immediately at
Witinington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
to indicate your intention to comply with the Act In addition, you must take the following corrective
actions to bring this site into compliance
File the attached application for a permit, including a reclamation plan, within 30 days of your
receipt of this Notice
2 In the event that your application for a permit is approved, you must post a bond or other form of
security acceptable to the Department to ensure that the affected area will be reclaimed when your
mining operation has terminated The bond does not have to be submitted concurrent with the
application for a permit
You must take tht, following corrective actions to restore or repau any damage that has resulted
from your unlawful mining activity
a 3 hc, sediment traps should be cleaily defined on tlne application Sipe and give details
regarding the sediment traps Pending application decision, install sediment traps
b Install construction entrance
c Apply fora NPDES dewatermg permit through NC Division of Water Quality
Of

Notice of Violations for Musing without a Permit
Rsck Williford
DcUmber 17, 2012
Page 3of3
4 As an alternative to filing the attached mining permit application, you must immediately initiate
reclamation of this site and complete the reclamation within 90 days of receipt of this Notice
Should you choose this alternative you must submit within 30 days of receipt of this Notice a plan
detailing the intended reclamation including a specific schedule for completion of this work
Violations of the Mining Act for mining without a permit are subject to a civil penalty of up to $5 000 00
per day for each day of a continuing violation A penalty may be assessed for violations committed
prior to your receipt of this notice A penalty will be assessed for violations committed after receipt of
this Notice Should you fail to comply with the terms of this Notice within the prescribed time frames,
additional enforcement action will be taken Such action may result in the issuance of an injunction or
the imposition of a r✓riminal penalty
The responsibility for understanding and complying with the iequirements of the Act rests upon the
individuals and firms who are subject to its requirements A copy of the Act and the Administrative
Rules is enclosed for your information
The subject site will not be considered in compliance with the Act until you have obtained a valid
mining permit and/or satisfactorily completed the required reclamation work
Please do not hesitate to contact either Brian Lambe or me regarding any questions you might have on
this matter
Sincerely,
Daniel Sams, PE, ME
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Attachments Two Mining Permit Applications
The Alining Act of 1971
NCAC 1 itle 15A Chapter 5
cc Ms Janet Boyer, PE
Linda Willis, DWQ

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
M1NE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
I MINE NAME S & P Sand and Gravel Mine 2 MINING PERMIT 0 16 23
3 OPERATOR Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS 4846-A Highway 24, Newport, NC 28570
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 12/3/12 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
8 Person(s) contacted at site none
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection`? ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures" ® Yes ❑ No
11 Date last inspected 3/22/10� 12 Any mining Since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permits ❑ Yes ®No
If no, explain Operating condition 4A Adequate mechanical barriers (sediment traps) not maintained
Construction entrance not installed
OC 4B All drainage from mine area is not diverted to pit See 4C
OC 4C No dewatering activities shall occur at this site 1 he mine permit is in contradiction with DWQ
pennits (to be verifi(A) and with mine map Significant flow at sediment tray, location
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit's ❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain Bond cancelation notice received No reclamation has begun Bond deadline 12/4/12
Reclamation Condition i Mine area has not been restored to a lake, slopes have not been suitably
rad� ._ed and stabilized
RC2A `1 he area is to be a lake area However, the outlet of the pit doers not allow for a lakt, to form
RC213 Slopes have not been graded to final condition Q verticai to I horizontai)
RC2C Stockpiles have not been leveled and smoothed
RC3 Revegetation has not occurred
RC4 Reclamation has not occurred
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offyite damage? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage Slight amount of dirt in road
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
1 Immediately begin reclamation procedures includin grading, slopes to a 3 1 providing
groundcover on all bare areas Elsewise, reinstate the bond immediately
2 Provide detail of sediment traps to be reconstructed Show dimensions, materials, calculations
3 Install sediment traps upon approval
4 Install construction entrance
5 Revise permit to include dewaterina You do not have a NPDES dewaterina mri-nit either I his
nLeds to bt rectified
17 Other recommendations and comments
18 1s the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate'? 0 Yes ❑ No (Explain) N Not Reviewed

f9 Follow -yap Inspection needed` ® Yes ❑ No
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Re p oJC t 1 Proposed date Jan 2Q13
21 Copy of Re
IPiSPEC I'ED BY Brun Lambe port sent to operator 12/ ] 7/2012�`
-
DATE 12/17/2012
Telephone No 910-796-7314 Bri L n nedenr gov
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
I MINE NAME S & P Sand and Gravel Mime 2 MINING PERMIT # 16-23
3 OPERATOR _ Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS 4846-A Highway 24, Newport, NC 28570
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 11/7/16 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
8 Person(s) contacted at site John Wilcox _
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection9 ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures? ® Yes ❑ No
11 Date Bast inspected 3/22/10 12 Any mining since last inspection" N Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Perm1t9 ❑ Yes [Q No
If no, explain Operating condition 4A Adequate mechanical barriers (sediment traps) not maintained
Construction entrance not installed
OC 413 All drainage from mine area is not diverted to pit See 4C
OC 4C No dewatering activities shall occur at this site The mine permit is in contradiction with DWQ
permits (to be verified) and with mine map Significant flow at sediment trap location
14 Is the mane in compliance with the ReLlamation Conditions of the Permit? N YLs ❑ No
If no, explain
15 Dad any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage'? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage Slight amount of dirt in road
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
i Provide detail of sediment traps to be reconstructed Show dimensions materials, calculations_
2 Install sediment traps upon approval
3 Install construction entrance
4 Revise permit to include dewatering This can be done upon renewal as long as no problems arise
17 Other recommendations and comments
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate9 ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) N Not Reviewed
Not in file_ Last report I have iS 2005 Enclosed form Raleigh central office should mail this
to you every year Enclosure is just so you know what to look for
19 Follow-up inspection needed9 ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date Ian 2013
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report-1 21 Copy of Report sent to operator[ 1 /09/2012
INSPECTED BY Brian Lambe I --� ' DATE 11 /08/2012
Telephone No 910-796-7314 Brian am a nc enr gov
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

-partment of Environment and Natural Resources,
ALand Resources, Land Quality Section
TE INSPECTION REPORT
e S (PERMITTED MINE)
1 M" -uanu "ravel Mine (formerly Russell Mine 2 MINING PERMIT # 16-23
3 OPERATOR Mr Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS 4846-Hwy 24 NeyTort,NC 28570
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 11 /7/2016 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
8 Person(s) contacted at site No one
9 Was mine operating at time of inspections ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures" ❑ Yes ® No
1 I Date last inspected 04 05 07 12 Any mining since last inspection9 ® Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain #4 D - Mining activities shall occur as indicated on the current mining map__The
Gravel construction entrance needs to be installed and/or maintained
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit9
If no, explain
® Yes ❑ No
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage „ It appears that material is being tracked onto streets at times
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken install and/or repair the gravel construction entrance to
g vent tracking onto Bogue_Loop Rd _
17 Other recommendations and comments Be sure not to stockpile any debris or ether material not
generated inside the -permit boundaries- refer to permit conditions If compliance is not met upon next
inspection date, a "Notice of Deficiency" letter may be issued
18 is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate9 ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed? ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date 3 1909
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 21 Copy of Report sent to operator 2 23 09
INSPECTED BY Paul Worthington loym DATE 2 19 09
Telephone No 910 796 7215
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1 MINE NAME S&P Sand Gravel Mine (formerly Russell Mane) 2 MINING PERMIT # 16-23
3 OPERATOR _ M_ r Rick Williford
4 COUNTY Carteret 5 ADDRESS , 4846 HM 24 Newport, NC 28570
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 11/7/2016 7 RIVER BASIN White Oak
8 Person(s) contacted at site No one
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10 Pictures9 ❑ Yes ® No
I Date last inspected 04 05 07 12 Any mining since last inspection9 ® Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain #4 D - Mining activities shall occur as indicated on the current mining map The
Gravel construction entrance needs to be installed and/or maintained
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit's E Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
15^ Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage It appears that material is being tracked onto streets at times
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken _ Install and/or repair the gravel construction entrance to
prevent trackingonto Bo ug a Loop Rd
17 Other recommendations and comments Be sure not to stockpile any debns or other material not
generated inside the permit boundaries- refer to Hermit conditions If compliance is not met upon next
inspection date, a "Notice of Deficiency" letter may be issued ^'
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate9 ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed? ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date 3 1909
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 _ 21 Copy of Report sent to operator 2 23 09
INSPECTED BY Paul Worthington `�W W _ „ DATE 2 1909
Telephone No 910 796 7215
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

��
NC®ENR "
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1� V it y ?006 ;
Division of Land Resources if
James D Simons, PG PE
Director and State Geologist
Mr Rick Williford
4846 Highway 24
Newport, North Carolina 28570
RE Permit No 16-23
S&P Sand and Gravel
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr Williford
Land Quality Section
November 7, 2006
Mine (formerly the Russell Mine)
Michael F Easley, Governor
William G Ross Jr, Secretary
Your request to have the above referenced mining permit, issued to Mr Glenn D
Russell, transferred in its entirety to you has been approved In addition, you requested the
permit be simultaneously modified and renewed The modification is to increase the permitted
acreage to 26 12 acres and the affected acreage at this site to 22 67 acres This modification
includes the addition of the haul road from Bogue Loop Road, increase the mine excavation
area to 22 acres, as indicated on the Overall View Map A dated May 5, 2006, and change the
mine name from the Russell Mine to S&P Sand and Gravel Mine
As we have received the required surety in an amount sufficient to cover the present
operation, I am enclosing the transferred, modified and renewed mining permit The new
expiration date is November 7, 2016
The conditions in the renewed and modified permit were based primarily upon the initial
application Modifications were made as indicated by the renewal and modification requests
and as required to insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971
G S 74-65 states that the issuance of a mining permit does not supersede or otherwise
affect or prevent the enforcement of any zoning regulation or ordinance duly adopted by an
incorporated city or county or by any agency or department of the State of North Carolina
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 26 12 acres and the amount of
land you are allowed to disturb is 22 67 acres
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 •919-733-4574 / FAX [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh North Carolina 27604
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Past Consumer Paper

MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for the
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Protect/Number'sSamr 6 GU.,ccounty em, krd
1(1, 3
Please return comments back to
Comments due by
7c, I (YiC
Will the the operation, as proposed, violate standards of water quality? OCh �p
Comments -6 6,r_ c NYe-La-A N DPP.
We-4 .t,h ri d. becid mru-ecL we a*� TVA
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification S rsr C`1Zt'c' U _20 �� SArI b WQ
iq-41-5-3 C rQVV
YES N0
NPDES permit required y
NPDES permit existing (Permit #
Nondlscharge permit required
Nondischarge permit existing (Permit #
Wetlands disturbed
401 Wetland Cert required
401 Wetland Cert existing (Permit # )
Reviewedcv �+ at 1 r�,(,��nDate �3-10
Print Name ._ LIMA
0912005 Central Office Reviewer
Car
CA-1UJJ0r KrND
NGG i?ev�
�cr If�u+,set S

14 , " " �'�i 1. - �; f; 41 "i I.-, " , - 'k. , X " ", , ",-. , V,
e)" 't'g ":'R(" . - r '�k Y M.
g
t '4t
4.
Existfng Fire Trai�s
Ajl
X
Existing Ac
CeSS Roads!.
�P� NL'
�6
: �N
"Illy
Proposed Sediment Trap Access Road
-A
Existing Hatil Road 'i"
4
P
Existing Sediment TrE
14. 1
ips (2)
6.
.7
0
r

.�t
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERM)T'I EID MINE)
1 MINE NAME r� r! 2 MINING PERMIT #ZZA -�
3 OPERATOR / 4 OUNTY /�,� 7_Fk 67-
5 ADDRESS
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 7 VER BASIN
8 Person(s) contacted at site / /2
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection9 ❑ Yes ;7f-No 10 Ptctures9 ❑ Yes ,'E4�--No
11 Date last inspected / % 12 Any mining since last tnspection9 []Yes 0 No
13 Is the thine in compliance with ,the Operating Conditions of the Permit9 �{ Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes r No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
17 (Other recommen attons and comments G Gv 6 - a
�y
n
1 t
18 are al Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ❑ Yes No (Explain) 0 Not Reviewed
srJ%r►1,40��"ll
�C�ll _
19 Follow-up inspection needed9 ❑ Yes T2o Proposed date 1 f
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report21 Copy of Report sent to operator I /
( ate)
INSPECTED BY r� /' DATE �I ' /y?
Telephone No � ob
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197

State of North Carolina
�Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James B Hunt, Jr , Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Certified Mail Z 7000 I670 0005 7386 0833
Return Receipt Requested
August 14, 2001
Mr Glenn Russell
131 Russell Rd
Newport, NC 28570
ITS
Dear Mr Russell
f
, 0
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
Notice of Deficiency
Glenn Russell Mine
Carteret Co, Permit I9A-28
On August 14, 2001, an inspection of the subject mine was performed by personnel of
this office (copy of inspection report enclosed) As you will note, several deficiencies were
observed that require your prompt attention The deficiencies discovered and the necessary
corrective actions are as follows
OPERATING CONDITIONS
I A Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N C Environmental
Management Commission
B Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N C Environmental
Management Commission It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact the
Storm water Section, Division of Water Quality, to secure any necessary stormwater
permits or other approval documents
Provide documentation of a Division of Water Quality permit for mine dewatenng
Contact the Division of Water Quality (910-395-3900) for consultation on appropriate
permits
i
M&
ZD
127 North Cardinal Dr, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Glenn Russell Mine
August 14, 200I
Page 2
3A
Sufficient buffer (minimum 200 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between an
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway or wetland from erosion of the affected and to preserve the integrity
of the natural watercourse or wetland
B Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U S , or wetlands
shali be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N C Environmental Management Commission
A canal (-15' wide x 10' deep) has been constructed with vertical cut slopes through the
buffer Sediment has reached the wetland/waterway/natural watercourse Mill Pond
Branch Restore the 200' undisturbed buffer and stop sediment from reaching surface
waters
4 A Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen dikes,
silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the Initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from
discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland, or natural
watercourse in proximity to the affected land
The outlet is discharging sediment into the natural watercourse Erosion and sediment
control measures are not present Sediment deposits are evident Install an adequately
designed erosion and sedimentation control measure for the outfall or do not dewater
6 The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which can be
retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure, structure,
or device In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of
which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion
The excavated canal has steep cut slopes and is unvegetated Off -site sediment damage
from siltation has occurred at the outlet The angle of slopes must not be greater than the
angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measures
13 The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit or any
approved revision to it Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions
The mine ]reap has not been followed An appropriate design for erosion and sediment
control measures at a dewatering outlet has not been approved Propose a design to
prevent the erosion and sedimentation of the mining activity outside the permitted
boundaries and get it approved by the Division of Land Resources
127 North Cardinal Dr, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 3
Glenn Russell Mine
August 14, 2001
If the previously described deficiencies are not corrected within 30 days following your
receipt of this Notice, this matter will be referred to the Director, Division of Land Resources,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, for the issuance of an official Notice of
Violation in an effort to secure compliance at the site
Please do not hesitate to contact Ms Janet Paith or me at [phone] regarding any
questions you may have about this matter
Sincerely,
4 )
Daniel Sams, P E M E
Wilmington Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
DSljp
Enclosure August 13, 2001 Mine Inspection Report
cc Mr Tracy Davis, P E , State Musing Specialist
127 North Cardinal Dr, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% reevcled/10% post-consumtr paper

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
' (PERMITTED MINE)
1 MINE NAME SSP%I . i1C. 2 MINING PERMIT
3 OPERATOR ��l 4 COUNTY C
5 ADDRESS 2 :�j7D
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE q- W7- ` 6 (e 7 /RIVER BASIN -
8 Person(s) contacted at site QON
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes 10 No 10 Pictures es ❑ No
11 Date last inspected / 1 /139 12 Any mining since last inspection? M V ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Pernut? ❑ Yes No
If no, explain i //A 41 +rir /�'C r rr� �/r r �/- /-S/? � �/ t�T r., r / lr_, tr%rr r r t.-/�I { t ' j
J'j 5�"'ek`r /' trU/ /L+tc f�/��,! �_J7� A! 1e/bG//,r3 l r_a✓C G_f ;r'/A[/ J///i �/L�f4
f .A/ ) / l C% r /Y} + ril i r Y I ,i i f] % /�� / x-//
47/i/� t/r~�/ rG� f )Ct ��ir/// rrr/cs/ ty`/.(fir
lei ♦ Yrrr E�'L 1<]rlC ,
lr �.J C%"T�� J �• 7C /�� �/� irJ7~ liFfi /1.G
! 1 rr rIr )� Pii/rC !✓r /�_ 6' `7
orl,_ i
14 Is the mine m/ compliance with tfie Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? des ❑ No
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damages &d Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and seventy of the damage
16�orrective measures needed and/or taken , /!, l r �- ZV /r 1, , -/, � / S`� �' ,•.f � , /
%. /. / ,lifl /4 /1E .lr�i//rr �`F�r•/ ff�� bra/'(-t E' � 1 '%-�-� t< <G! {/C 1 c.r'
_� .1/�// ��/..✓I,.s�l �erri�,')fr r%/T� �i/rt �!•1fir
J, ✓ ! / , �! / {r / Gil r 1t {, . fi/ �! r J� 7 ('l i i / /L 4/z • _�_ 3 b /r� % T f / T/' F .S+ ` /
17 OtheOreconimendations and com ents
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? 2-T-es ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed 2" es ❑ No Proposed date / !
0 No of additional pages if Inspection Report 21 Copy of Report sent to operator
ke7
/ A/01
te)
SPECTED BY Y �7 _�S c LDATE
one No 3 �! <" �0v
y /
to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
1

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION ]REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1 MINE NAME fez , V r� 2 MINING PERMIT #_.
3 OPERATOR ;' - kv, u 4 COUNTY cf
S ADDRESS / 7 f h _Z jig ;7,:.
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE - 7 VER BASIN
8 Person(s) contacted at site fir. t'!
9 Was mane operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes Z No 10 Ptcture:0 Yes ❑ No
11 Date last inspected _ �'r !l z,�.r 12 Any mining since last inspection9#%Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the PerrniO ❑ Yes 9 No
1 0 E�� �... i L -v ...a � c�i . s � It P tr -
If no, explain � (� - - � _�-�' � S-.. _..._r � ? _ _ ,� ^ - i
�I E t i rtii 4
_—�.' • 3 t�i ��: r � � .,� i �' � t 5 ��r R � ��,C � . � � �. � c: _ �� ' i� 5 . c .,].. -�,_ S�� t ��v�c � T � r F�a�.�i'c
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permits Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage9 ❑ Yes 12'No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage
16 Corrective measures needed and/or taken
1 ✓ e 4 / C-. , i(js ( fa
1
/YJ / rl ' r
17 Other recommendations and comments ? G '-
�% t
f r
GJ ! 1 T 7 C-I.Q cL-L , .I
18 Is the Annual ReclaTa ion Repo` +/-map accurate9 es No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed? es ❑ No Proposed date I /
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report 21 Copy of Report sent to operator
(date)
INSPECTED BY��f" l �_y - �.�t' � a` DATE
w✓A
Telephone No w �G� 7" _e'?'
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
�11

LAn QDALITY SECTION
PROJECT /1 n 2(J_r l�
Page -e9 of
ui r1 c 17
COMMENTS %"- 5 4 �. <- fj �` � / l �(/ �f G G / �/e .( , r 7 rr
1
1�
f / w E f r7 �
INSPECTED BY�/l[ir J /� DATE

_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1 MINE NAME � �/•� Jccss iie 2 MRZNG PERMIT #
3 OPERATOR C - :,ter X�x rf -4 COUNTY._��/er,��� T�
S ADDRESS X ,( I '
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE - . `2-�7- X� ' 7 ''RIVER BASIN _ C.� � 4!264,
8 Person(s) contacted at site K)')rj y
9 Was mire operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes I No 10 Pictures? �es ❑ No
11 Date last inspected i � I 1 I ci`j 12 Any mining since last inspection? Y ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with`the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes b No
If no, expain /A ,:ram al
_0&J
f
A-f GJ t c ! a, ,r
r 1 n �' !U
14 Is the mine compliance with a Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? es ❑ No
If no, expl m /
r ♦ '.r191Cr�
/ r
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage
16 orrective measures needed and/or taken ,� f
r`
i
� o �
/v G�Cr i
17 Othe ecommendations and coralnents, ar eL./ Hr e `
P7' .S %Lc er o f
18 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +I -map accurate? Er-Y-e-s ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed? es ❑ No Proposed date 1 I
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report 21 Copy of Report sent to operator 1 I
_ - (date)
INSPECTED BY �" Chi ATE / 3/0 t
Telephone No
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
f�
1�r
C-S'
�/'k

JECT
6� c, y
Page_�of
I c 4
II3SPECTEB BY DATE

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE) �?
1 MINE NAME sue_ �� RUC 2 MINING PERMIT #_ � � � 2S
3 OPERATOR 5 it 4 COUNTY �` --lam 1-
5 ADDRESS U Gc_ /
6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE ;V a 7 /7 R VER BASIN
8 Person(s) contacted at site /, L;h-)ft
9 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes $No 10 Pictures? ❑ Yes 0�No
11 Date last inspected / 7-1 / I `j 1 12 Any mining since last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? A Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
14 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? I�C Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
15 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damagef►
16 Corrective_ measures ne ckd and/or taken
�L
17 .Other recommendations and comments
�r r 4 k, S
62 alSGG 7 %G�t2� ell r
If —Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? 2"�`es ❑ No (E lam) ❑ Not Reviewed
19 Follow-up inspection needed? Yes ❑ No Proposed date 1 I
20 No of additional pages of Inspection Report_ 21 Copy of Report sent to operator i I
_ ,, (date)
INSPECTED BY - i.�"� DATE -/ //5
Telephone No
White copy to file Yellow copy to operato7 Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197

North Carolina Department of Environment, Heafth, and Natural Resources,
Omson of Land resources, Land Quality Section
MWE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED LINE)
1 MINE NAME ELL-. /Yl /L _2 MINING PERMIT# ' �-
3 OPERATOR L L L ," v 4 COUNTY
5 ADDRESS !3 c us 3 �c f Nt 6 PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
7 Person(s) contacted at site
8 Was mine operating at time of inspection? ' Yes ❑ No 9 Pictures' ❑ Yes [ANo
10 Date last inspected 11 Any mining since last inspection' C�'Yes ❑ No
12 Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ZNo
If no, explain
r / e ' / ' /
13 Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain
14 Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? [(Yes ❑No If yes, describe the type
and seventy of the damage W z -,l
15 Corrective measures, n/eeYdee and/or taken ,z 27
all
Y4
"� �JJ �i -
16 Other recomme dat�an and comments
2, L t
17 Is the Annual Reclamation Report +f- map accurate? XYes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
18 Follow-up inspection needed? [] Yes [P(No Proposed date 1 f
19 No of additional pages of Inspection Report 20 Copy of Report sent to operator 1 l�
' date)
INSPECTED BY !r%✓LF% C ' DATE
Phone No ( (,y') S" - )j
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining 5pecrahst
9/9 t
N

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
I Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference
the sequence to the mine map(s) Attach additional sheets as needed pLeA.5- RqE FCV LL CE
M^p JL. AS dF MAY 15,2006 TI05 MIME. 1AAS DGeN Exe-AVATVP To
ge-move FtryftiA%*reLy $ol of oVIFAWA PW oN ALL THRM PAq-CCLS.
ExCAVAT10N RAKEtGS PRbM 0 Tb 2,0' is pefTH C AvAT!oN Wl"
$vita i m K.E. CPAKOZ of PARCe t- t AN Dcom nm u� TowAaP5 west
AND SouT14 . SMRFACLO LA�eR of "suGaR SAmP��wiLL. Go sow " 1ri5
ExcAV*TeV. 'TWO -SEDIMENT TRAPS ARIF IN sour*eAST
GcIiN ER o F PARGt&L. 3.
2 Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s), waste pries, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence
of installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures Locate and label all sediment and
erosion control measures on the mine maps) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details
of each measure Engineering designs and calculations shall be required when needed to Justify the
adequacy of any proposed measures TLea4a REC-4RLrNeZ tAAf G. PR I o R
VeRM1Tret. 4 AS INSrALLAO *41) AAAINTr}tNCD TWO SEDIMENT rlRAfPS.
6R0uN0Wffe%x c�4q�wlJ�cs %xisr *N o cIR*vw D w47-em PLLP*s
FRpm CLARReNT ro s e Di meNT T"5
3 a Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste
water handling` Yes No—je-- If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any
chemicals to be used
b Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point
discharge to the waters of the State? Yes_ /i_ Na If yes, briefly describe the nature of the
discharge and locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on
your mine map (s)
C Ll VjWrsT' D t5 CNACZ4E 1 5 Ex filc�tEt-7 LiG�i T i EST��I�T�D
ft'r Le5s TIA*tA I elp.41. TAts WATER FL.oalS INTO A SMALL BRAUCH
Cp,t.LED M I u- 'POMP 13RW cot . M JLL fV9V 13 eA Nub eVeRru*L" FL.owS
JWTO Cloo3E GREEK UANC-% . cL; RROW 56D IMCU'r T ZAp FVu cnvaJ
VMy vJeu- AMP MkC AT Arti4xl MRTeLy (6-2o' rarrL.ow &PtAr)a

S&P Sand and Gravel, LLC }
Newpoll, NC
`. Wetlands from County GIS .
Map H `

3/1113 reports onh,state ne us/ncarfhte 15a - eNrmrneo and natiral reswreestchgAer 02 - eruronnwIA n>anagermntlsubchapler b/15a ncac 02b 0312.h"
01 %.
I SA NCAC 02B .0312 WHrrEOAK RIVER BASIN
(a) The White Oak River Basin Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards may be inspected in the following
places:
(1) the internet at httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/csu/; and
(2) the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources:
(A) Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina;
(B) Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina; and
(C) Division of Water Quality
Central Office
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina.
(b) The White Oak River Basin Schedule of Classification and Water Quality Standards was amended effective:
(1) December 13, 1979 see Paragraph (c);
(2) June 1, 1988 see Paragraph (d);
(3) January 1, 1990 see Paragraph (e);
(4) August 1, 1990 see Paragraph (f1;
(5) August 1, 1991 see Paragraph (g);
(6) June 1, 1992 see Paragraph (h);
(7) December I, 1992 see Paragraph (i);
(8) November 1, 2007 see Paragraph 0);
(9) July 1, 2011 see Paragraph (k).
(c) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
December 13, 1979 with the reclassification of portion of the White Oak River Restricted Area (Index No. 20-32) and a portion
of the Newport River (Morehead City and Beaufort Harbors Restricted Area) [Index No. 21-(31)] from Class SC to Class SA.
(d) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
.tune 1, 1988 with the reclassification of unnamed waters as follows:
(1) a portion of the Roosevelt Natural Area Swamp, which drains to Bogue Sound (20-36), from Class SA to Class
C Sw ORW.
(2) another portion of the Roosevelt Natural Area Swamp, which drains to Bogue Sound (20-36), from Class SA
to Class SA SwORW.
(e) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
January 1, 1990 as follows:
(1) Intracoastal Waterway (Index No. 19-39) from northeastern boundary of Cape Fear River Basin to Daybeacon
No. 17 including all unnamed bays, guts, and channels, except Rogers Bay and Mill Creek and Intracoastal
Waterway (Index No. 19-41) from the northeast mouth of Goose Creek to the southwest mouth of Queen
Creek were reclassified from Class SA to Class SA ORW.
(2) Bear Island ORW Area, which includes all waters within an area north of Bear Island defined by a line from
the western most point on Bear Island to the northeast mouth of Goose Creek on the mainland, east to the
southwest mouth of Queen Creek, then south to green marker No. 49, then northeast to the northern most
point on Huggins Island, then southeast along the shoreline of Huggins Island to the southeastern most
point of Huggins Island, then south to the northeastern most point on Dudley Island, then southwest along
the shoreline of Dudley Island to the eastern tip of Bear Island to the western Muth of Foster Creek
including Cow Channel were reclassified from Class SA to Class SA ORW.
(3) Bogue Sound (including Intracoastal Waterway from White Oak River Basin to Beaufort Inlet) (Index No.
20-36) from Bogue Inlet to a line across Bogue Sound from the southwest side of Muth of Gales Creek to
Rock Point and all tributaries except Hunting Island Creek, Goose Creek, and Broad Creek were reclassified
from Class SA to Class SA ORW.
(4) Core Sound (Index No. 21-35-7) fromnorthem boundary of White Oak River Basin (a line from Hall Point to
Drum Inlet) to Back Sound and all tributaries except Atlantic Harbor Restricted Area, Nelson Bay, Jarrett Bay,
Williston Creek, Wade Creekand Middens Creekwere reclassified from Class SA to Class SA ORW.
reports.oah state.nc us/ricadfi tle 15a - en*orawt and nalurel resources/chapter 02 - enMrartle A rmenm9ernenUsubcheow b/15a neat 02b ,0312.hM 1/2

Y1113 reparts.oeh statenc uaftaAfle 159- eNrcnmwd end natiral resaurceetchepter 02 - awranmentei awwgeawW9ubchWW d15a ncac M .0(312.htrd
¢5} Back Sound (Index No. 21-35) from a point on Shackleford Banks at lat. 34 degrees 49 57" and long 76
degrees 37 30" north to the western most point of Middle Marshes and along the northwest shoreline of
Middle Marshes (to include all of Middle Marshes) to Rush Point on Harkers Island and along the southern
shore of Harkers Island back to Core Sound and all tributaries were reclassified from Class SA to Class SA
ORW.
(f) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
August 1, 1990 with the reclassification of a portion of the White Oak River [Index No. 20-(1)] from Spring Branch to Hunters
Crcek from Class C to Class C HQW.
(g) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin was amended effective August
1, 1991 by adding the supplemental classification NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) to all waters in the New River Drainage
Area above a line running across the New River from Grey Point to a point of land approximately 2,200 yards downstream of the
mouth of Duck Creek.
(h) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin was amended effective June 1,
1992 with the reclassification of Peletier Creek (Index No. 20-36-11) from its source to Bogue Sound from Class SA to Class SB
with the requirement that no discharges be allowed.
(i)The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
December I, 1992 with the reclassification of the Atlantic Harbor Restricted Area (Index No. 21-35-7-2) from Class SC to Class
SA ORW .
0) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
November 1, 2007 with the reclassifications listed below, and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality maintains a
Geographic Information Systems data layer of these UWLs:
(1) Theodore Roosevelt Maritime Swamp Forest near Roosevelt Natural Area Swamp [Index No. 20-36-9.5-(1)]
was reclassified to Class WLUWLas defined in 15A NCACO2B.0i01.
(2) Bear Island Maritime Wet Grassland near the Atlantic Ocean [Index No. 99-(4)] was reclassified to Class WL
UW L as defined in 15A NCAC 0213.0101.
(k) The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the White Oak River Basin has been amended effective
July 1, 2011 witli the reclassification o f a portion of Southwest Creek [Index No. 19-1740.5)] from point approxmately 0.5 inile
upstream of Mill Run to Mill Run from Class C NSW to Class SC NSW, and another portion of Southwest Creek [index No. 19-
17-(6.5)] from M ill Run to New River from Class C HQW NSW to Class SC HQW NSW.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-214.1; 143-215.1; 143-215.3(a)(1),-
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. July 1, 2011; November 1, 2007; December 1, 1992; June 1, 1992; August 1. 1991; August 1,
1990.
reparts.oah statem uslncacltitle 15e - eNromieni and natural resarces/chapter 02 - errAronrmtal rrxansgementtsubchapier b115e ncac 02b 01312.htrr1 212

r i►'l
< o >
r A
< i�'7 >
Features
Canals
�- Yipt:lates �
W arerL odies
Coastlines 1 '
Catchments s
Hydrologic Cents �►
EPA Water Program Feeftm 4,
- - 'IW46 Listed Impaired Waters _
3"b)As.Rmwd Waters
Beaches re y
Clean Watersheds Needs Suncy V lop..Q r
. Combined Scorer Ovcrtlows
- CWSRF Benefits Repwitng
Facilities that D -harge to Water
Fish C:ousuniptionAdvisones
Firh risque Data
.,
Impaired wren with rwxs
- Monitoring Locations -
® No Discharge 7_onts s••" o,,,, s� _->,;Q., y
- Nonpoint Source Projects
- K`ucr Quahty Standards �`'+ 10

�
'IF

I IP

• 1 ,I� hJ1` � ,
i
Ewr ou ,�_a': d

roll
x
Int 14 704914Inn 77
S&P Sand and Gravel
R
NOW
r
Eye a!I

NCG020000 N O 1
2 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically Issued therefore
3 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection
so as to contain all spills on the site
4 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N C statutes and rules governing
solid waste disposal
5 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not
result in contamination of the surface or ground waters
I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such Information is true, complete and accurate
Printed Name of Person Signing
Title
(Signature of Applicant)
(Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100 00 made payable to NCDENR
Mail the entire package to
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information
Asheville Office
[phone]
Fayetteville Office
[phone]
Mooresville Office
[phone]
Raleigh Office
[phone]
Washington Office
[phone]
Wilmington Office
[phone]
Winston-Salem
[phone]
Central Office
[phone]
Page 6of8
SWU NCG02 NOI Last revised 9/5/2012

1►Kei
��
Applicant has included a detailed list of Impervious surface areas and percentages, sub drainage
areas and total drainage area
If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise Impact surface waters or groundwater,
Include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan (see below
for contact information) You maybe required to provide an approved Pumping O&M plan pnorto
NCG02 issuance
2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans (at least 24 x 36 ) delineating areas on the jolans and listin
acreage (including wetlands ditches well -placements pits borrow areas overburden storage
stormwater controls/BMPs vehicle maintenance areas settling basins product process (such as
screening, stockpiles waste piles) total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if state sw
programs apply) applicable buffers and access and/or haul roads)
Pump dewatering size and information on its specifications
Well information (design depths maintenance)
Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas
Settling pond sizing information, if applicable
Level spreader design if applicable
Details about dewatering method
Cone of influence calculations
Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding
Description & information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained
Copy of US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if
applicable)
I have contacted my local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan
Regional Office Contact Date contacted
I will not any impact nearby wetlands, surface waters or groundwater by dewatering
Certification North Carolina General Statute 143-215 6 b (i) provides that
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation or certification in any application record report plan or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article or who falsities tampers with or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10 000)
33) Signatory Requirements (per 40 CFR 122 22)
All applications reports or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified
a All notices of intent to be covered under this General Permit shall be signed as follows
(1) For a corporation by a responsible corporate officer For the purpose of this permit a responsible corporate officer means (a) a president
secretary treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function or any other person who performs similar
policy or decision making functions for the corporation or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities
employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars) if
authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship by a general partner or the proprietor respectively or
(3) For a municipality state federal or other public agency by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit I understand that coverage under this permit will
constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual
permit
I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit
1 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity (A copy of the valid mining
permit must be attached to this request
Page 7of8
5wU NCG02 NOI last revised 915l2012

NCG020000 N O 1
Other
31) Hazardous Waste
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage or Disposal Facility?
❑ No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b or c , please provide the following information
Type(s) of waste
How is material stored
Where is material stored
How many disposal shipments per year
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor _
Vendor address
32) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materialsO See permit
text for secondary containment requirements
❑ No
❑ Yes
33) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes specify type ❑ LCID ❑ Other
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and
initialed for Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each
space below
Fee of $100 made payable to NCDENR
Completed application and all supporting documents
Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status
Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads
Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams wetlands and other waters etc
2 copies of large-scale (minimum 24 x 36 ) site plan with topographical lines with all outfalls applicable
buffers and wetlands clearly delineated and 100 year flood plain line if applicable
A copy of your DEMLR mining permit
A copy of your US Army Corps approved wetland delineation if you marked 'yes to question 23 above
A line drawing of the water flow through the facility A pictorial description of the nature and amount of any
sources of water and any collection and treatment measures
If mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties
• Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State
Stormwater permit Regional Office Contact
Page 6of8
SWU NOG02 N01 Last revised 9/5/2012

r
NCG020000 N O 1
23) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
❑ No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission
Stormwater BMPs
24) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No ❑ Yes If yes please briefly describe
25) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes when was it implemented?
26) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility?
❑ No ❑ Yes
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
27) Will mine dewaterrng discharges occur?
❑ No
❑ Yes
28) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur)
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes,
a Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes please state the name manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical additive
dote Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North Carolina
http //portal nedenr org/web/wp/ws/su/npdessw
b Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10 yr 24-hr rainfall event?
❑ No ❑ Yes
29) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain)
❑ No
❑ Yes
30) Is your facility washing mined materials)
❑ No
❑ Yes If Yes are you discharging this water?
Page 5of8
SWU NCG02 NOI Last revised 9/5/2012

NCG020000 N O 1
19) Discharge Points
Number of discharge points (ditches pipes channels etc that convey discharges from the property)
Onsite Stormwater Mine dewatering Process Wastewater Overflow
Offsfte Stormwater Mine dewatering Process Wastewater Overflow
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan
Please provide short narrative description of discharges
a) is your mine dewatering and discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatenng)
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes where to? Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site)
Other (on -site or off site) Describe
b) Are you dewatering but not discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering)
❑ No
❑ Yes If Yes please explain how you are dewatering and where that water will be directed
20) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
❑ No
❑ Yes
Note Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the
Division
For sites that may dram wetlands — approval of a_Pumping O&M plan may be required prior to
coverage under this general permit The Pumping O&M Plan should be submitted to the
appropriate Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation
The plan shall include but is not limited to (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance See
checklist at end of document Contact your local Regional Office for questions specific to your mine
21) If you are dewatering, are there wetlands or surface waters within 400 of the mine pit perimeter)
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter? feet
22) Have you been required to obtain a 404/401 Certification permits >
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation BMPs, setbacks
and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information) Attach other sheets as necessary
Page 4 of 8
SWv NCG02 NOi Last revised 9/5/2012

NCG020000 N O 1
11) Are you applying for a mining permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine9
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes specify permit number and name if known
12) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex recycle permits)*7
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility
13) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mix and asphalt areas9
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes do they have DWQ stormwater permits (if owned by the same company)? ❑ No
(provide permit number )
If not owned by the same company who is the owner?
14) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
15) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties and will it add more than 10,000 W of impervious
surface's
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, you may be required to apply for an additional state stormwater permit Check with your
local Regional Office See contact information and checklist below
16) Is this mine located the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basins, or the Randleman or Jordan
Water supply Watersheds >
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes what size stream buffers are included on site? R Please show buffers in site plans
If yes, please include information and plans showing diffuse flow through buffers as required
Discharge Points Receiving Waters & Wetlands
17) Receiving waters
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake etc ) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in?
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e g City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer)
Receiving water classification (if known)
Note Discharge of industrial wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-II to WS-V, or SA, must
be approved by the Div of Water Resources, or Div of Marine Fisheries If DWR or DMF does
not approve, coverage under NCG020000 cannot be granted No new discharges of wastewater
are permitted in receiving waters classified as W5-1 or freshwater ORW Wastewater
discharges to Saltwater ORW will not be approved under the NCG02 General Permit
18) If your facility has wastewater discharges and they are to HWQ and/or PNA waters (Primary Nursery Areas)
waters, what is the proposed flow rate? (See
htto I/www ncdmf net/maps/FNA maps/index html for map)
Page 3of8
SWU NCG02 N01 Last revised 915I2012

r
NCG020000 N O 1
2) Location of facility producing discharge
Facility Name
Facility Street Address
Facility City State ZIP Code
Facility County
Facility Contact
Telephone No Fax
Contact E mail
3) Physical Location Information
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names state road numbers and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection)
4) Latitude
Longitude
(degrees, minutes, seconds)
Permits
5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following
❑ New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
❑ Existing Date began mining
6) Standard Industrial Classification
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary Industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility
8) Is this mine an inactive mine site >
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes do you posses an Inactive Renewal from DEMLR and notified the DWQ Regional Office or
have you certified to the DWQ that the site has been stabilized? ❑ No ❑ Yes
9) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
(DEMLR) [formerly DLR]'?
❑ No If No please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application
❑ Yes If yes please provide the Mining Permit number Please also provide a
copy of your DEMLR Mining Permit with this DWQ application
Note DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCGO20000 Genera! Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or
renewed by the DEMLR
10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits')
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility
Page 2 of 8
SWU NCG02 NOI Last revised 9/5/2012

Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
NCDENRNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
manna C n _ 10o_� o
1D~0 Kd4T w? WAIAM Wso.nc
NCG020000
NOTICE OF INTENT
M
Amount
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCGO20000
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The following activities are also included
Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden raw material, intermediate
products finished products byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations,
Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations
Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater, and/or
Mine dewatering (wastewater)
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit
Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining coal mining, and metal mining
Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from asphalt
operations and/or concrete operations
Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations and
Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150
The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000
Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in stream sand mining operations (I a sand
dredging or dipping operations)
Please contact the NPDES Wastewater Pant -Source Group for more information on coverage under this
permit
Please print or type all entries in this application form
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (official address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed)
Legal Owner Name
(Attach the most recent Annual Report to the NC Secretary of State showing the current legal name of the corporation or entity
Alternatively this permit can be given to an individual or government authority This name must be the same name as appears on the
Division of Land Resources Mining Permit)
Signee s Name (as signed for in permit signature at bottom)
Street Address
City
Telephone No
Alternate Contact Name
Alternate Contact Telephone (if different)
State ZIP Code
Email
Email of different) _
Page 1 of B
SWU NCG02 N01 Last revised 9612012

APRIL 25) 2013
Michelle Benton, PE
Project Manager
Sunland Builders Inc
4846A Hwy 24
Newport, NC 28570
❑PERATIDNS
SANDS AND GRAVELS ARE EXCAVATED AND ST❑CKPILED ADJACENT
T❑ THE EQUIPMENT, THEN L❑ADED INT❑ DUMP TRUCKS, N❑
PR❑CESSING ❑F MATERIALS ❑CCURES ❑N SITE, N❑ WASHING,
SEPARATING ❑R MIXING ❑CCURES. THERE ARE N❑ IMPERVIEUS
AREAS ❑N SITE N❑R ❑FFICE FACILITIES N❑R WASTE DISCHARGES ❑F
ANY KIND. CURRENT ❑WNERS PURCHACED AN EXSITING MINE CALLED
RUSSEL, A RIP --RAP R❑CK DAM WAS AND IS USED AS AN
❑UTLET/❑VERFL❑W STRUCTURE, N❑ P❑INT DISCHARGES EXIST,
❑VERBURDEN AND CLEARED VEGETATI❑N ARE ST❑CKPILED T❑
CREATE WINDR❑WS F❑R ER❑SI❑N AND WILDLIFE PURP❑SES.
C❑NTACT DATA
❑PERAT❑R/MANAGER:
252-393-2504
P❑ B❑X 1436
CHARL.ES R, WILLIE❑RD
SWANSB❑R❑ f NC 28584
❑PERAT❑R/MANAGER: WILLIAM K, PAGE
252-393-8116
HITE
52000
_❑❑P RD
28570
[CHAEL B❑YD
$480100
IE L❑❑P RD
NC 28570
15
SCALE 1" = 100'
100 50 0 100
LEGEND
PR❑PERTY LINE
DIRT R❑AD
CREEK / STREAM
C❑NT❑UR CELEV>
WIRE FENCE
SITE DATA
24:34 AC T❑TAL ACREAGE
17k34 AC 539502961243000
6,35 AC 539502954300000
0,65 AC 539502956429000
CARTERET C❑UNTY, NC
WHITE ❑AK RIVER BASIN
DATA TRANSEERED ER❑M CARTERET C❑UNTY
G❑VERNMMENTS WEBSITE, USGS T❑P❑GRAPHIC MAP,
NCDENR DWQ WEBSITE AND PR❑PERTY SURVEY.
MINE PLAN
EOEIVE
JUL 2 3 2013
BY:
BOGUS PII
NCDENR PERMIT N❑, 16-23
November 7, 2016
SAP SAND AND ❑RAVEL, LLC
308 VFW R❑AD
SWANSBORO, NC 28584
0

HAROLD L SHIPP SR.
FRANKLIN G HECKLER 539504948829000
\ 539502958557000 104 HUNTING BAY DR
4526 HWY 24 CAPE CARTERET NC 28584
NEWPORT NC 28570
OLD MILL POND BRANCH WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN
\ \ UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
EXISTING SANDERS CREEK
OU TFALL 1 / SA, H WQ
FRANKLIN G HECKLER \ 539502958557000 S D 0 #1 — � � I �-- -'� � � ` 303d LISTED IMPAIRED
` }
4526 HWY 24 / \ o\ 100 YR AE 8 2002 CAT 5 LOSS OF USE
f NEWPORT NC 28570 \ _
DIRT PATH ` 1' / / ROCK \ \ O 1 \
WE \ I CREEK = PL
i o /
U S FORESTRY SERVICE ROCK �.` , N� 1 1 B Y DEED
J8.36 INVERT fJ Water Ele1tion
, 12/31 /13 9A'
Q
-�
o // ELf 1 LOCATION — —r
0 1 /ec �� ` / /i P`'�N ! / 1 `� .. ` — —DANA C. LAWRENCE
/ (�y/ / ���� �6 Q`C' / / r f 1. 11 / f \ ) ` 53950494278000
/ / ' D�-`��x� / .r / J \ — 140 BOGUS LOOP RD
�
30
` \ NEWPORT NC 28570
�\ J WATER SU R,FACE \
/� I AFFECTED
APPROXIMATE J AREA r
PIT OUTLINE 2C91'4 \ '�u er_ �4„ W \.Ins, 0� 42 CN
+ — 15.7 A �i _ y eC�� N 02 34 4 ry O'S 49" i 5
/ EARTH BERM 'Z� [ 09 a 2� �+ W A �OAO� 2a3.a� 2 �8 �4 44�49.
1 1�} D WHI�EO
7 // ( / OAD OLD '
/ / 4551� `DIRT RS INGRESS EASEMENT 60 r52.g�. —
/ EGRES CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
A, 3 42" C
�R�#' / MQ•�` ©� '1/ /STEEL GATE WILTON PRITCHETT /
/ �\ `�� EARTH BERM539502858502000
�S / 605 / WITH BOULDERS 56B0LOOPRDGUE L
NEWPORT NC 28570 / O
^o r
SEE STORMWATER\ i
/ POLLUTION / / / WILTON PRITCHETT
PREVENTION PLAN 539502865501000 y�, / Q-
NI f APPENDIX FOR / / 156 BDGUE LOOP RD A � / O
y NEWPORT NC 28570 �1�'
f CALCULATIONS / 0
100 YR AE 8
CS
i
PI
N
U �-
0
1 J
FEB 21 2014
51a!
5 MAXIMUM APPROXIMATE_ ACRES LIFE OF
Q� /
1-11 1 9
Sunland Builders Inc
4846A Hwy 24
Newport, NC 28570
NCDENR DIVISION OF
WATER QUALITY NPDES
GEN. NATIONWIDE DISCHARGE
PERMIT # COC NCG020845
4 YR STATE RENEWALS
DEC 31, 2014
CATEGORY
AFFECTED AC.
Tailings ZSediment Ponds
15.06
Stockpiles
2.00
Waste files
0.00
Processin Area Haul Roads
0.00
Mine Excavation
4.01
Other Off site Haul Rd
0.64
Total
Disturbed
Acreage
21.71
OPERATIONS
SANDS AND GRAVELS ARE EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED ADJACENT TO
THE EQUIPMENT, THEN LOADED INTO DUMP TRUCKS. NO PROCESSING OF
MATERIALS OCCURES ON SITE, NO WASHING, SEPARATING OR MIXING
OCCURES. THERE ARE NO IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON SITE NOR CFFICE
FACILITIES NOR WASTE DISCHARGES OF ANY KIND. CURRENT OWNERS
PURCHACED AN EXSITING MINE CALLED RUSSEL. A RIP —RAP ROCK DAM
WAS AND IS USED AS AN OUTLET/OVERFLOW STRUCTURE. NO POINT
DISCHARGES EXIST. OVERBURDEN AND CLEARED VEGETATION ARE
STOCKPILED TO CREATE WINDROWS FOR EROSION AND WILDLIFE
PURPOSES.
SANDERS CREEK
CONTACT DATA
nv. 0.50'
°9`B SOb�eOk
a
OPERATOR/MANAGER: CHARLES R. W LL FORD
252— 39 3— 2504
PO BOX 1436
SWANSBORO, N C 28584
OPERATOR/MANAGER: WILLIAM K. PAGE
252-39378116
PATRICIA WHITE
539504945752000
110 ROGUE LOOP RD
NEWPORT NC 28570
BRUCE MICHAEL BOYD
53950494480100
130 BOGUE LOOP RD
NEWPORT NC 28570
SCALE 1 " = 100'
100 50 0 100
LEGEND
--------- PROPERTY LINE
DIRT ROAD
-- .— — — — CREEK / STREAM
— —1 — — CONTOUR (ELEV)
WIRE FENCE
SITE DATA
24.34
AC
TOTAL ACREAGE
17.34
AC
539502961243000
6.35
AC
539502954300000
0.65
AC
539502956429000
CARTERET
COUNTY, NC
WHITE
OAK
RIVER BASIN
DATA TRANSFERED FROM CARTERET COUNTY
GOVERNMMENTS WEBSITE, USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP,
NCDENR DWQ WEBSITE AND PROPERTY SURVEY.
NOTE PERMIT REQUIRES NOT DISTURB REQUIRED BUFFERS.
ALL SLOPES REQUIRED TO BE 3-1 HORZ TO VERTICAL FOR
RECLAMATION. INSPECT STORMWATER AND EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL WET DETENTION BASIN WEEKLY.
REPORT OBSERVATIONS AND COMPLETE QUARTERLY
SAMPLING AND SAMPLING DURRING TWO STORM EVENTS..
MINE PLAN
ROGUE PIT
NCDENR PERMIT N0. 16-23
November 7, 2016
S&P SAND AND GRAVEL, LLC
308 VFW ROAD
SWANSBORO, NC 28584

i
10146
MaLe end
TR-5 Name o plicant Rick W1111ford
�R-� Name of Mine S&P Sand and Gravel
North Arrow on Ma , LLC
Count p
eret
1755 5 Y CartScale Approx 196 4'hn
� � Symbols used No special
Date Prepared May Symbols used
Y 5 , 2�06
Map Prep parer Michael S Rose, CFO
�) 5587 -
(I 48A)
1473
I anG
I
(12A4A)
2710
I
131 SA) to ckable Stee
9848 � pos#S 4 1` na Gate
rR 924
I
N
Parcel 1 of 3
17 3 Acres
r 8502 URI
122
Existing maul Road
2356
1 333
3 4 i68
tit /
�1 (57A)
i� �
k� //M3
y j,
I
S&P Sand and Gravel, LLC
Newport, NC
Overall View
Map A
�za {
ast��aed
ea
s�a�r
r.�
,Ilk
53g5 vj
Parcel 3 of 3
4 65 Acres
Parcel
2 o€ 3
7 6 Acres
Location of two (2)
o° Existing Sedimentatic
t Traps shown in
Orange
DE
f '4

.` ..4!' i

U.S. FORESTRY SEEM /ICE
WITNESS CORNER
Cn� R�1FR +3
TRA 4C' 70 II (1974)
LOi CATER S 88 E 11.8- FROM PROPERTY CORNER
.rr:•
.- 9
U.S. fnRF ;TIDY
IRON MONUIy1C:NT (1974) •3`� � =�' � /
Oro
. - 41
,. U.S. F ORLS`1'RY SERVICE
41
IRON MONUMENT (1935) "'� ,ae -C,
LOCATED FROM PROPERTY B11.2�'
COriNER S 20 A6
t�
SIP
i
4i i a
cl
U.S. FORESTRY SERVICE // P
PROPERTY sip ','
sip-'
s
SIP 4 6.8 6 119.99
o,� J
F&
. � DIRT ROAD tOLn Wr11 l LUAK HUAIJI
n2 SIP «. N 9 05 17
27i
�85
3
SIP •
U.S. FORESTRY SERVICE
IRON MONUMENT
CORNER f2
TRACT 149
LOCATED N 31 35 60 W
167'.69 FROM PROPERTY CORNER
ram.
9
0 IV
TRACT I
�j
14.34 Acres
N 06 58 1 1 W
•�-. 1Sf4.73
01
R PRITCHETT PROPERTY
/o�'X // goof
PROPERTY OF
JANIE KATHLEFN WOOLARD HEIRS
NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF BOGUS
WHITE OAK TOWN HIP,
REFEREW)E DB
CARTERET COUNTY N.C.
199 PG. z 53
0
S 10 17 E 5 8 w 'Q
208.3 1
S 18 28 42 W O
506.63
0 /
REFERENCE LINE ONLY ,'
CENTER OF CREEK IS BOUND4RY LINE
/ O a'
a N DAISY KOONCE'
SUBDIVISION �
co
U)
MILL POND BRANCH
i
r
i
JLI,' cr I Ll �UUNTY ���,
repi�rg certificatets) nt '��C
is.(are) cerdfie4 to bp correct. � his i_ strument wis pp{,
seated for7egistmttan recorded in this office i�
This ; day of t/�/ ' I 3t� 0,cI VA
Sharon Pinar
g-iiste/r of Dee s
Depubi
IJ
,gypCk wrl��
I ir, % 41�U 44rthy that Ahm map was Arsrre 9y ■o q 00 C
of o as ettrel *Vevey 6y ws p eot the'a �s raise al "Oeblon A
rilatsd tag fVt�t*a.� rA•^ oa>tortrr5r'` Is t 1 �L' his
loop >ees� prokliaree Y.: *assr4ones �Itlrl a
1V4 -E�
s* teat�ss*e
nasv ay Raced and day a8 Pk) . V99 �A
' 5'
r �� l ] ��