Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0023949_Wasteload Allocation_19880810NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SNEET NPDES Permit: NCO023949 City of Goldsboro WWTP Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Engineering Alternatives Analysis 201 Facilities Plan FONSI approval Staff Report Permit History Date Range: Document Date: August 10, 1988 THIS DOCUMENT IS PRINTED ON REUSE PAPER - IGNORE ANY CONTENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCOO 23 W 4 FACILITY NAME: C iT: o; GQLYJS ZORa Facility Status: i=NL PROPOSED (circle one) Permit Status: RENEWAL ' NODI1F7CATION UNPERAQI'1'ED NEW (circle one) Major Ninor�_ Pipe No: Design .Capacity (MGD): (0,?35 Domestic (S of Flow): Industrial (!L of Flow): Comments: PLOT, 7,1 RECEIVING STREAM: Class: Sub -Basin: Reference USGS Quad: (please attach) County: Regional Office: As Fa Mo Ra We Wi WS (circle one) Requested By: Date: Prepared By: Dete: n Z 2 -� z5, list Reviewed By:� Date: Modeler Date Rec. # r� Drainage Area (mid) �. �' Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 7Q10 (cfs) 213 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) _265 30Q2 (cfs) Toxicity Limits: 1WC % (circle one) Acute /CChronic) Instream Monitoring: _3/w2ek : Apt- - Or-+ � week�.� : 140v - may - Parameters ➢dTvA be!a�JuV_ . MnIq . C n8u i Cc( (4 VVl Upstream Location —� Downstream Location t-0 C.�,,, 2 R l Oo Z Effluent Characteristics Summer Winter BODs (mg/0 30 NHs N (mg/0 8 D.O. (mg/1) G TSS (mg/1) �o _S U F. Col. (/ 100ml) t 000 LCIED CD PH (SU) _ q (9_ Cil o�a 4 as 6+t 2 Z Z Comment,*:lL"� MQr • fk ukrb 4 r .(,r�)MVAtt km , (Opmr-, _tt A-5S 1 -- WASTELnAn ALLOCATTON APPROVAL FORM ---- wasp 11�G nr� 47f+jc� Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Status: Receiving Stream: Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Quad: Goldsboro WWTP NCO023949 90% domestic, Existini? Neuse River C (NSW) 030405 Wayne WaRO David Foster 4/4/88 F27SW 10% industrial Drainage area: Summer 7Q10: Winter 7Q10: 1-1 2427 sq mi 273.10 efs 264.80 efs -------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ------------------------- Summer Winter Current Wastef low (mgd) : 6.735 6.735 10.0 BOD5 (mg/1): 15 30 30 NH3N (mg/1): 8 DO (mg/1): 6 TSS (mg/1): 30 30 30 Fecal coliform (#/100ml): 1000 1000 1000 PH (su): 6-9 6-9 6-9 Total phosphorus (mg/1): 2 2 effective May 1, 1993 Chronic toxicity target: 4% 4% ---------------------------- MONITORING ---------------------------------- Upstream (YIN): Y Location: Hwy 117 Downstream (YIN): Y Locationl: Approx. 3 miles downstream of dischar Locationl: Hwy 111 Parameters: DO, Temperature, BOD5, pH, conductivity, & fecal coliform Frequency: 3/week April -October, weekly November -March. ----------------------------- COMMENTS ----------------------------------- Effluent monitoring for Chromium, Copper, Lead, & Cyanide is recommended. Total phosphorus limit is effective May 1, 1993. Change from exisiting limits is based upon available instream monitoring data, intensive survey information, and updated modeling analysis. ------------------------------/----------/---------------------------------- Recommended by: 7�f�d?�M4 XL" Date: Z�p� Reviewed by Tech Support Supervisor: Regional Supervisor: Permits & Engineering: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Date: _. Date: Date: AUG N 0 MO 0 U' L, K z7/ Facility Name 1TD(AS60(6 Permit# NCOOZ3949 CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at.no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *February 1987) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is —�—% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The fast test will be performed after thirty days from issuance of this permit during the months of 'Sag �__.Se( Dei . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDE9 permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP313. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Technical Services Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, N.C. 27611 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute a failure of permit condition. 7Q10 264.5 cfs PermitedFlow (e.435 MGD IWC% 3.149 Basin & Sub -basin 03o4o5 Receiving Stream Pease- River County WoLgge. Recommended by: **Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 4 %, #a Apr 3a1 Ok , See Part 3 , Condition = . 12 11 10 9 E 8 O C1 7 6 5 4 Goldsboro WWTP DMR D.O. Data <-- New plant ❑ Upstream 1 + Downstream QIl i. ;V C� 6 5 Neuse River Dissolved Oxygen Prediction Goldsboro and Kinston-Northsidc NVLAs g 7— DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT July 21, 1988 TO: Trevor Clements FROM: Thomas Stockton' SUBJECT: WLA's for Goldsboro and Kinston-Northside WWTPs Summary Goldsboro and Kinston-Northside WWTPs have applied for permit renewals. No modifications are proposed at either plant. Due to the close proximity of sev- eral large dischargers in this area of the Neuse River, a QUAL2E model was used to examine the interaction of these facilities at their current permitted load- ing. At the currently permitted loading dissolved oxygen sags below S mg/l are predicted below the Goldsboro facility and below the Kinston and DuPont facili- ties (see attached). Interaction with Weyerhaeuser may also result in predicted dissolved oxygen violations, however, model uncertainty is very high in this area. Dissolved oxygen problems are not predicted at actual current loading. Both the Goldboro and Kinston facility appear to be capable of meeting more stringent limits than currently permitted (see attached DMR data). Goldsboro's instream monitoring data indicate dissolved oxygen problems were occurring in the past when loading was closer to the permitted loading. Goldsboro recently brought a new plant on line which has significantly reduced loading. New permit limits for Goldsboro and Northside WWTP appear to be attainable with existing facilities. A D.O. minimum of S.D mg/l is predicted at this load- ing, however, due to the level of model uncertainty and the contribution of sev- eral other facilities in the area to the D.O. sag, this may be the most appropriate short-term course of action. Model Development_ Hydraulics: A time -of -travel (TOT) study was performed below the Goldsboro facility in 1979. Gaging stations are located at Goldsboro and Kinston from which hydraulic power functions were developed. The power functions estimated from the Goldsboro station predicted TOT that closely matched the 1979 TOT, therefore, these power functions were used in the QUAL2E model for reaches down to Kinston. The Kinston gaging data is the only source of hydraulic information in this area of the river. East Carolina performed a TOT study below Contentnea Creek which indicates a significant reduction in velocity. This area is just above tidal influence and appears to be very swampy. Model uncertainty in the hydraulic parameters increases moving downstream from Goldsboro. Qualitatively, this uncertainty is probably fairly low until Contentnea Creek. Kinetics: No reliable field information is available for developing the kinetic parameters. CBOD and NH3 decay rates were estimated using the LB equa- tions. The Tsivoglou and Wallace option in QUAL2E was used for reaeration. All model data sets, data used for model input, and model output are attached. Recommendations Time -of -travel studies should be performed on the Neuse River with the fol- lowing priorities: 1) Hwy 11/55 to Contentnea Creek 2) Contentnea Creek to Streets Ferry 3) SR 1915 to Hwy 11/55 4) SR 1008 to SR 1915 Synoptic water quality sampling studies should be performed throughout the area. DuPont's permit expires in April 1990, therefore, emphasis should be placed in refining the model in this area. Contentnea MSD, Kinston -Peachtree, and Genoa Industrial Park expire in 1992 and Cherry Hospital expires in 1993. We should aim at having a reasonable model for developing equitable permits by 1992. PRETREATMENT HEADWORKS REVIEW ----------------------------- Discharger: Goldsboro WWTP Receiving stream: Neuse River Stream Class: C USGS Zone: 4 7010: 264.800 cfs Design flow: 10.000 mgd Actual flow: 5.3 mgd Percent industrial: 10.0 IWC: 5.5 % 07/15/88 Actual Actual Allowable Domestic Industrial Pollutant Standard/AL Removal Load Load Load --------- (mg/1) ------------ Eff. ------- (lbs/day) --------- (lbs/day) --------- (lbs/day) --------- Cadmium 0.002 S 92% 36.79 0.120 0.29ir Chromium 0.05 S 76% 306.61 2.000 14.220 Copper 0.015 AL 82% 122.64 2.440 4.900 Nickel 0.05 S 32% 108.22 0.840 0.400 Lead 0.025 S 16% 43.80 2.000 0.720 Zinc 0.05 AL 77% 319.94 7.010 5.780 Cyanide 0.005 S 59% 17.95 1.640 0.400 Mercury 0.0002 S 86% 2.10 Silver 0.01 AL 94% 245.29 Total USGS Predicted Allowable Influent Background Effluent Effluent Load Reserve Conc Conc Conc (lbs/day) ------------ (lbs/day) ---------- (mg/1) --------- (mg/1) -------- (mg/1) -------- Cadmium 0.41 36.38 0,0007 0.0362 Chromium 16.22 290.39 0.015 0.0880 ^ 0.6479 Copper 7.34 115.30 0.004 0.0299 `> 0.2029 Nickel 1.24 106.98 0.0191 0.9042 Lead 2.72 41.08 0.004 0.0517 > 0.3838 Zinc 12.79 307.15 0.01 0.0665 0.7334 Cyanide 2.04 15.91 0.0189 > 0.0904 Mercury 0.00 2.10 0.0004 0.0000 ;: -0.0032 Silver 0.00 245.29 0.0000 0.1808 . 12 11 1a 9 E 8 O 7 6 5 4 Goldsboro WWTP DMR D.O. Data ❑ Upstream + Downstream Cum CUB Drainage 7010 Average Cum Summer Winter Rch/Ele Sta Area Summer Winter Flow Design Flow D.A. Flow Flow ! (miles') (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (mgd) (cfs) (miles') (cfs) (Cfe) Neuse River -Smithfield gage 1206.0 254.0 180.0 1206.0 254.0 180.0 Swift Creek 209.0 3.2 28.0 318 1495.0 257.2 208.0 Black Creek 101.0 1.1 1.1 116 1596.0 258.3 209.1 Bawdy Creek 25.0 0.2 2.5 28 1621.0 258.5 211.6 Mill Creek 190.0 0.4 13.0 224 1811.0 250.9 224.6 Mmcassin Creek 32.2 0.1 2.2 37 1B43.2 259.0 226.8 Thoroughfare Creek 117.0 0.2 8.0 119 1962.2 259.2 234.8 CP&L Lee Station 1.4 2.17 1962.2 261.4 237.0 Neuse River Cutoff NEU 1962.2 261.4 237.0 Little River NEU 317.0 9.0 24.0 342.0 2279.2 270.4 261.0 Cherry Hospital WWTP NEU 1.00 1.55 2279.2 271.9 262.5 Neuse River Cutin NEU 2279.2 271.9 262.5 Genoa Industrial Park 4/3 NEU 0.40 0.62 2279.2 272.5 263.1 Caroway Creek 4/4 NEU 2279.2 272.5 263.1 Neuse River -Goldsboro gage 4/5 NEU 2399.0 2399.6 272.5 263.1 Stony Creek 416 NEU 27.6 0.6 1.7 33.0 2426.6 273.1 264.8 Goldsboro WWTP 4/7 NEU- 10.00 15.47 2426.6 -288.61 28M Fellows Branch 4/12 NEU 2426.6 288.6 280.3 Green Branch 5/1 NEU 2426,6 288.6 280.3 Pine Level Branch NEU 2426.6 289.6 280.3 Sleepy Creek 5/5 NEU 11.1 0.2 0.7 13.0 2437.7 288,8 281.0 Walker Mill Run NEU 2437.7 288.E 281.0 Bogue Marsh NEU 2437.7 208.8 281.0 Walnut Creek 6/1 NEU 22.7 2.0 5.0 28.0 2460.4 290,E 286.0 Mill Creek NEU 2460.4 290.8 286.0 Cox Creek 6/12 NEU 2460.4 290.8 286.0 Hardy Mill Run 7/1 NEU 2460.4 290.8 286.0 Bear Creek 7/4 NEU 63.5 8.0 11.0 79.0 2523.9 298.8 297.0 Belch Branch NEU 2523.9 298.8 297.0 Manley Branch NEU 2523.9 298.8 277.0 Squirrel Branch NEU 2523.9 298.6 297.0 Whitleys Creek 8/1 NEU 2523,9 29B.8 297.0 Falling Creek 9/1 NEU 45.4 3.5 4.2 56.0 2569.3 302.3 301.2 Neuse River -Kinston gage 1011 NEU 2692.0 2692.0 302.3 301.2 Kinston -Peachtree WWTP 10/5 NEU 6.75 10.44 2692.0 312.7 311.6 Southwest Creek 10/13 NEU 65.8 0.5 4.0 79.0 2757.8 313.2 315.6 Rhem Canal 10/16 NEU 2757.8 313.2 315.6 Kinston-Northside WWTP 10/18 NEU 4.50 6.96 2757.8 320.2 322.6 Stonyton Creek 11/5 NEU 37.0 0.1 0.3 42.0 2794.8 320.3 322.9 Bone Gray Branch NEU 2794.8 320.3 322.9 E.I. DuPont 11/9 NEU 3.60 5.57 2794.8 325.9 328.5 Beaverdam Branch NEU 2794.8 325.9 320.5 Mosley Creek NEU 49.2 0.2 0.4 56.0 2844.0 326.1 328.9 Contentnea Creek 12 NEU 1010.0 36.0 73.0 1100.0 3854.0 362.1 401.9 Contentnea MSD (Contentnea Ck) 12/2 2.85 4.41 3854.0 366.5 406.3 Facility Mid Meuse Basin Rivermills Burlington Industries Riverfall (Goforth) Make Forest WWTP Riverfalk (Uniprop) River Landings Weaver Bros Farm Riverbend 0 Lakeside Hidden Cove MHP Barclay Downs (Utility Sys) Riverview MHP Raleigh WWTP Southmark Johnston County WWTP Lower Neuse Basin CP&L Lee Station Cherry Hospital (Little R) Genoa Industrial Park Goldsboro WWTP Kinstons-Peachtree WWTP Kinstons-Northside WWTP DuPont Contentnea MSD (Contentnea) Weyerhaeuser New Bern WWTP Expire OUAL2E Design Limits X CBOD/ CBDD Permit 9 Date Basin Status Rch Ele Capacity BOD5 NH3 Indust. BOD5 Load (mgd) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) -------- ------ -------------- --- --- --------- ------ -------------- ------ ------ 56278 880731 030402 Prop ? 1376 880331 030402 Exist 67261 920831 030402 Prop ? 30759 910228 030402 Exist 39292 920731 030402 Exist 63533 900831 030402 Prop ? 030402 Prop ? 63541 900930 030402 Prop ? 32786 910930 030402 Exist 40606 921130 030402 Exist 38784 920229 030402 Exist 29033 871130 030402 Exist 7068B 920930 030402 Prop ? 30716 900630 030402 Exist 3417 820630 030405 Exist 26967 930228 030406 Exist 30392 920331 030405 Exist 23949 880930 030405 Exist 20541 921231 030405 Exist 24236 881031 030405 Exist 3760001 900430 030405 Exist 3760002 900430 030405 Exist 3760003 900430 030405 Exist 32077 921231 030407 Exist 3191 800630 030408 Exist 25348 880630 030410 Exist 1 2 0.02 I 8 5.0 1 9 1.265 5 1 1 it 1.2,6 3 2 0.101 5 2 3 3 0.05 30 3 4 3 5 0.026 30 3 7 0.035 30 4 4 0.035 30 4 7 0.035 10 4 5 1 40,50,60 7,5,5 4,2,2 6 5 0.2 5 2 4.0 1.4 2 2 1.0 22 18 4 3 0.4 30 4 7 10.0 30 10 5 6.75 22 10 10 !8 4.5 22 10 11 8 3.6 15.85 2.1 0.017 0.017 12 1 2.85 22 15 16 1 37.0 14.7 2 17 4 4.0 30 60% 2.5 75 10% 3.7 117 21% 2.0 44 OX 2.2 48 100% 2.5 40 40 . 20 _ ' D s 0 1 v e d 15 U B D D 5 1 c Neuse River Ambient Data Goldsboro Winter StevensMill Winter Goldsboro Summer StevensMill Summer Goldsboro Winter StevensMill Winter Goldsboro Sumner StevensMill Summer ,<-- -(LC6-L O J-- o.��mas..� Goldsboro Winter StevensMill Winter Goldsboro Summer StevensMill Sumter W Sample Average Median Lower Upper Temperature size quartile quartile Goldsboro Summer 45 24.0222 ?A3 25.0000 11 21.0000 916 27.0000 Goldsboro Winter 60 12.2750 Oil 11.2500 57.z5 S.00000 Go.& 16.5000 StevensMil Summer 31 22.6452 71.77 23.0000 114 20.0000 ITS 26.0000 StevensMil Winter 4= 11.3372 NA41 10.0000 7.00000 61 15.0000 Sample Average Median Lower Upper Dissolved Oxygen size quartile quartile Goldsboro Summer 44 6.73409 6.50000 5.90000 7.35000 Goldsboro Winter 59 9.38136 9.40000 8.30000 10.6000 StevensMil Summer 32 6.3B438 6.10000 5.60000 7.3000i) StevensMil Winter 43 9.22326 9.40000 8.20000 10.4000 Sample Average Median Lower Upper BOD5 size quartile quartile Goldsboro Summer 26 1.35769 1.15000 0.90000 1.90000 Goldsboro Winter 35 1.57143 1.40000 1.10000 1.80000 StevensMil Summer 32 1.60938 1.30000 1.00000 2.00000 StevensMil. Winter 46 1.67826 1.55000 1..30000 1.80000