310379_Inspection_20190718

Division of Water Resources
• Facility Number 7M - MiTS 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure
in for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0
„�
ation 0 Technical Assistance
;ency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County
Farm Name: r $C ` e>1�,��5 (7n j-M a Owner Email:
Owner Name: V�' P_r S CA'%4'1 "' n w -X _S Phone:
Mailing Address: `O a T J, \"Jallac(L t N c LA 6
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C,>O1-1 d a Sey��L-t 7 S Title:
Onsite Representative: 0. Zi AV_1 nS
t
Certified Operator: IAy _5�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
�� Yt Region: Wc1g<D
Phone::
Integrator: SXll*�'-kH.
Certification Number:
Certification Number:)
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
Other
Dischar¢es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non
-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 0140 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 S cture 2
Identifier: Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
� �Q-�'^�'
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 1T Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [D'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—]Yes G/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S ( , B } 4 1�
13. Soil Type(s): ((tS_Lpn,r O
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes [2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
0 Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes [J,,-4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes F3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes [� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes [No
❑ N A
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [—]Design [—]Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No E-N-A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility -Number: -39 21 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �dr/
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes ❑ No EIN/A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes dNo
❑ Yes dN0
❑ Yes E�l o
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
nw1T-_,s
1.14 kA,0
Vt,5A $
2-- 3. 1
gay Can 9 �� p,,,;;�,p , n 1' y, 11
5 VAILv s - 10
— C1 Q�Y� UQG,t, e�ti► Ce,11� ���-�- O�p S-or �� Y� `' n
t l,� �� "'""� a' � 1 JET' — �Dl'' � i-�o ��'�pa.v t'C�-L;1 � y►.e.vLt
oc
T r� bDA i Cal ( A'L',Y11�t�1 ll �j 11a T��r VAIS
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
�fo�V OH 7--CQ39
Date: �' -it -1 l
21412015