WQ0029792_Staff Report_20191017

d.nc SrAA w
- r
y
ROY COOPER ,
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGANi
secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit® Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0029792
Attn: Poonam Giri Facility name: 501 Lost Way SFR
County: Orange
From: Jane R.Bernard
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals Please complete all sections as they are applicable
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ®Yes or❑ No
a. Date of site visit:August 20, 2019 and September 26,2019
b. Site visit conducted by: Jane Bernard
c. Inspection report attached? ❑Yes or® No
d. Person contacted: Anne Campbell and their contact information: ( 919) 490- 0500 ext.
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s): -
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Sub-basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑Yes or❑ No
If no,explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils,depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑Yes❑ No
❑ N/A If no,please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines,wells,etc.)? ❑Yes ❑ No❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑Yes❑ No ❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D_E Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh,North Carolina 27609
�,.
919.791.4200

6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑Yes❑ No❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or❑ No
If yes,attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes,attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility?❑Yes ❑ No ® N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and
disposal system? ®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain: Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be
important for the permit writer to know(i.e.,equipment condition,function,maintenance,a change in
facility ownership,etc.) Property setbacks and waivers are in question.
3. Are the site conditions (e.g.,soils,topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and
adequately assimilating the waste? ®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the
compliance boundary,new development,etc.)? ❑Yes or® No
If yes,please explain:
S. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable?®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or® No
If yes,attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑Yes ❑ No® N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑Yes❑ No ® N/A
If no,please complete the following(expand table if necessary):

Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , II _ O ,
11
O , II O , 11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O , 11
O , „ O ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ❑Yes or® No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring,if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑Yes or® No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s)of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD,etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO
been working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ®Yes❑ No❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑Yes® No ❑ N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
IV.REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑Yes or® No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through
an additional information request:
Item Reason

3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when
issued:
Condition Reason
S. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparers 1 O
Signature of regional supervisor: l0 7
Date:
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
See the attached site plan.
There is no Engineers Certificate for the final construction in the file.

-' LAKE. 654
I
Yr. ..- 656
� � I
ACK4 PACKAGED
PUMP STATION I
1,200 GAL, SEPTIC TANK ROPERTY LINE
�. 6 -PEAT BIOFILT, TYP.)
,.-- ` `b'�D `rS TABLET CHLORINATOR \\\yl1l
•r ` 3,Op0 CAL, PUMP TANK ,
/ '&B CLEAR AREA AS REOUIRED TO
INSTALL TANKS & BTDFILTER
/ 1 1/2- 45' BEND
J
II
CONTROL PANEL
s
^-EVILS OF S SOBS AREA
BY S &1 I �, • ,� �. ,� � _ --- --' �"�� EVACUATED BY EC
t y
t ' r APPROXIMATE -
L e HOUSE LOCATION ' -
INSTALL A SPRR LOADED AUTOMATIC GRAIN VALVE IN A
1 112' TEE NODE REDUCING BUSHING AS REQUIRED. '
6 CS SURROUND TEE nDI 2 CU. Fi. OF WASHED STONE.
66, VALVE SHALL BEA BUCXNER MODEL 66 A OR APPROVED
.6 6&0 / EQUAL SET TOlOSE AT 10 PSI, DRAIN AT 2.5 PSI.
S 668. 9 150' FROM EDGE OF SPRAY
FIELD TO PROPERTY LINE
f0 ALUMINUM GATE _
'ON TREATED WOOD POSTS
n SEEF DE[NL THIS SHEET) -
1 i
SITE IS WOODED. INSTALLTI 1/2-�FUI�CEMN1www TNENGHER.� Sp Ri LF RISER
VARY FORCEMNN ROUTE AS,REOLyRED TLT RISTAL4THE',i0�(tCELNN ( -
KNOUT CUERNC:ANY 7REF5'.:CREATERsT
FY/N'EOUA-NEM 584W AFlEI t Y D 'i"'." ;p , -• c� '" •'4]L rt`RC:T—"-
Ausyscw.rs.I eE co r1w ss. q i� " +
�t _
+
w t -
�- •. J 1 Slll a Pic f
475
}3:
' D BARBED W,REa FEM10E t '
u` i 17'RE:0. A 'POGTG�'tOR z t 1 112' BALL VALVE IN PLASTIC
EO BOX AND BLQW-OFF ASSEMBLY
BEND AND THREADED CAP)
t
T
va
nq
th4
3
t