Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000442_2016 Tar-Pam Report Final_20181105 Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rule Annual Report August 2017 Donald M. Perry Assistant City Engineer – Water Resources City of Rocky Mount Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report City of Rocky Mount 1 I. Introduction The purpose of this report is to satisfy the annual reporting requirements set forth in the Tar- Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0258). Pursuant to these requirements, this report contains information on the progress of the City of Rocky Mount’s work toward meeting the intent of the Rule through new development review, illicit discharge detection and elimination, identification of potential retrofit locations, and public education and outreach. In general, the city’s stormwater management program consists of thirty-nine and one-third (39.33) full time operational and three and one-third (3.33) full time administrative positions. The program is funded through a Stormwater Utility, established in 2003 for the purpose of providing funding to support compliance with the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rule, the Water Supply Watershed rules, and the city’s NPDES Phase II permit. The program’s projected Fiscal Year 2017 revenue is approximately $4.0 million. II. Reporting Year October 2015 – September 2016 During the reporting year, the program focused on construction of capital projects, which reduce flooding and improve water quality, as well as operational maintenance. Progress in these areas is detailed below. The following is a breakdown of the city’s stormwater program areas as specified by 15A NCAC 2B.0258: New Development Review and Approval The city approved development plans for eleven projects falling under the criteria of the Tar- Pamlico NSW Rule, totaling 494.5 acres (Battleboro Farm Solar Elec Power Plant, Battleboro Solar Site, Homewood Suites, Hospira Haz. Storage Building, SECU – ATM Addition, CT Trucking, Lot 15C & 15D Revised for Parking, Rocky Mount Mill Village, Hathaway Switching Station, Rocky Mount Academy Storage Building, & NCDOR. Of these developments, seven utilized a total of eight structural best management practices for nutrient reduction. Five projects utilized the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. 1577.22 pounds of nitrogen, and 203.89 pounds of phosphorous were purchased for mitigation from the bank. Hospira had previously paid into the NCEEP for Nitrogen and Phosphorous mitigation credits. The total net loading for the 2016 reporting period, including credit from the nutrient mitigation bank, was 1422.78 pounds per year (2.88 lb/yr-ac) for nitrogen and 177.02 pounds per year (0.36 lb/yr-ac) for phosphorous. These net total loadings are below the goal of 4.0 and 0.40 lb/yr- ac for Nitrogen and Phosphorous, respectively. For a more detailed summary, please refer to Tables 1 and 2 in Appendix A. Illicit Discharges Minor discharges continue to be addressed through informal letters or phone calls to residents or business owners. These included landscaping contractors blowing grass clippings into storm drains or residents dumping leaves into ditches. Most of these incidents were reported through the stormwater hotline in response to several ads run on the city’s government access channel, CITY TV-19, asking for reports of this nature. The program also issued three official Notices of Violation. Details regarding these violations and their dispositions are: - On February 9, 2016 personnel from our office inspected property located at 1265 Independence Drive in Rocky Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal discharge from a broken sanitary sewer service located behind the building at 1265 Independence Drive, thereby at a location adjacent to a waterway that Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report City of Rocky Mount 2 enters into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. The owner was notified and the situation was resolved. - On November 17, 2015, personnel from our office inspected property located at 1129 and 1109-1115 N Fairview Road in Rocky Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal dumping of a stucco/paint type material into the parking lot storm drain inlets, and thereby at a location that would enter into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. Eastern Environmental Management was called out on Tuesday November 17, 2015 by Mr. Walt Crayton, the owner. Apparently, some contractors doing some stucco repair had improperly clean off their tools into (2) storm drains at 1129 N Fairview Rd, Rocky Mount. EEM responded by vacuuming both storm drains out and then flushing both storm drains with approximately 50 gallons of water per storm drain. EEM also brushed off the tops of each storm grate and lightly brushed the side walls from any residue. EEM collected approximately 125 gallons of non-haz material for disposal. - On June 01, 2016 personnel of this office inspected a car parked on the street adjacent to 109 Justin Court. The inspection revealed a recent accumulating oil leak as a result of a car parked on the street for an extended period of time. We issued a Pre-NOV in lieu of a formal Notice of Violation due to the fact that the noted violation does not pose an immediate threat to life, property, or the environment. However, the Pre-NOV indicated the potential violation must be corrected by July 15, 2016 to avoid issuance of a Notice of Violation. After discussions and meetings with the car owner, the oil from a leaking car was removed from the street. - On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, a City of Rocky Mount employee observed a Thompson Nursery employee disposing/blowing leaves/grass clippings onto the street adjacent to 130 S Franklin Street Bank as part of the lawn maintenance operation. This violated Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances which states the following regarding discharges to the stormwater system. In the past, Thompson Nursery, Inc. has been found to be in violation of Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances and was notified of the violation; thereby, qualifying as a repeat offender. As a result of the repeat violation, a civil penalty of $50.00 was accessed for this most recent incident. The assessment amount was based on guidelines in City Ord Sec 10-216. Efforts during FY 2017 will include: - Continue efforts updating existing and formulation of new SWPPPs for municipally owned facilities. Although Best Management Practices have been implemented, formalizing the plan is needed. - Collaborate with Bill Hunt of NCSU on the installation of a research process/material that will further enhance to nutrient reduction capabilities of wet ponds. This exciting and promising research includes the installation of proprietary materials on/in the littoral shelf of wet ponds, which will be performed by City forces. In addition, the City will assist in monitoring the site. Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report City of Rocky Mount 3 - Further expansion of enforcement of the city’s IDDE ordinances, including implementation of a more thorough training program for city employees focusing on good housekeeping and illicit discharge response. - Continue the routine cleaning of storm drains and the standard maintenance of stormwater conveyances such as ditches, channels, and swales. - Continue Explore/Implement methods to promote the “Sodfather” video, which explains the issues associated with blowing grass clippings into the street and storm drainage. Retrofit Opportunities The city continues to investigate the feasibility of riparian buffer restoration in various locations. Following Hurricane Floyd, many lots affected by flooding were bought by the city using money from FEMA. Most of these properties border creeks or the Tar River, and have little or no riparian buffer area, thus making them good candidates for restoration activities. Additionally, the following three retrofit opportunities continue to be analyzed by the city: 1. Leggett Road Outfall to Tar River – Stream restoration. 2. Wilkins Street Outfall to Tar River – Stream relocation/restoration. 3. Boys & Girls Club – Construct BMP Between primary outlet and stream to reduce nutrient discharge from site. In addition to these three potential retrofit locations, as reported in the 2014 Annual Report, the city received a grant from the Clean Water Management Trust Fund and has purchased two parcels of undeveloped land along Stoney Creek in Rocky Mount in January 2013, which was listed as an impaired water on the 303(d) list. This property is the first in a series of acquisitions the city hopes to make along Stoney Creek in order to construct a greenway and walking trail. In addition, the city plans to study the feasibility of constructing an educational bmp on the largest parcel (15.4 acres) that was acquired. More detailed information regarding these potential retrofit sites and the Stoney Creek properties can be found in Appendix C. Public Education and Outreach The Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule requires development of a locally administered environmental education program to address nitrogen and phosphorous loading issues with the public and with developers. In addition to education regarding nutrient transport and water quality, the education program is also required to address peak stormwater flows with developers. A variety of activities have been identified for use in developing a comprehensive public education program capable of satisfying the requirements of the rule. Point values were assigned to each activity. Based on the points assigned, all affected local governments are required to develop a plan comprised of activities that sum to at least 15 points per reporting period. Over the past year, the city conducted activities with a total value of 38 points. These activities include: Arrange Speakers 21 points Web Page/Web Site Links 2 points Factsheets/Brochures/Flyers 2 points Expand Adopt-A-Street 4 points Environmental Hotline 3 points Major Media Advertising 6 points Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report City of Rocky Mount 4 In addition to those presentations listed in the point total in Appendix D, the City’s Keep America Beautiful Coordinator attended several expos and disseminated stormwater information and giveaways. With regards to media advertising, the city continues to take part in the Clean Water Education Partnership (CWEP), administered by the Triangle J Council of Governments. CWEP allows member local governments to pool their resources to fund a comprehensive public education program. Through CWEP, the city contributes toward the purchase of radio, television, internet advertising, print, and cinema advertising. In Rocky Mount, CWEP was able to run DENR’s Johnny Fishpatrick spot in local theatres in the summer of 2015. The spot conveys general messages about sources of pollution and the public’s role in preventing it in a family-friendly way. The spot was viewed 9,110 times. CWEP also ran an online video pre-roll campaign in Fall 2015 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015- 2016 stormwater public outreach program. Video pre-roll is an advertising spot that is shown before an on-line video clip. In the Rocky Mount jurisdiction, this pre-roll made 12,173 impressions. CWEP embarked on another program first in FY 16 with an online social media campaign in Fall 2015. The Sodfather video was posted on a series of Facebook post which sharing generated over 61,000 online impressions and had over 12, 000 views on Facebook between August 20 and October 3, 2015. In addition, there was a high level of Facebook post engagement with 505 post clicks, 223 likes, 19 comments and 72 shares. CWEP also completed a FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign. The Spring campaign had three separate components and features a new 30-second version of the Sodfather spot based on partner feedback. The Spring campaign made 29,239 impressions within the City of Rocky Mount jurisdiction. In an effort to reach across broader audiences CWEP maintained its internet presence leading to an average of 2,068 unique visitors to www.NCcleanwater.org per month for the 12-month period between July 2015 and June 2016. There were a total of 36,741 visits to the website for the 12 month period between July 2015 and June 2016. In addition to continuing the public education initiatives pursued through CWEP, the city plans to expand the public education campaign for FY 17 by continuing to research the effectiveness of the installation of drain markers in high priority areas for illegal discharge detection. More detailed information related to the city’s public education efforts and the television, radio, and internet campaigns spearheaded by CWEP is provided in Appendix D. III.Program Summary The City of Rocky Mount’s stormwater management program continues to prove itself to be a leader in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. In the area of new development review, the city has gained compliance and support from the local consulting and development community, and continues to emphasize the importance of compliance in sustaining the valuable resource that we are charged with protecting. Throughout the city, citizen involvement continues to grow, leading to increased reporting of illicit discharges and illegal dumping. In addition, through the joint public-private efforts, awareness of stormwater issues continues to trend upward, resulting in increased water quality. In the coming year, we will continue to ramp up enforcement of our IDDE ordinance, educate the public through informational brochures and mailings, and implement training across the city organization on good housekeeping practices for first line supervisors. Additionally, we have completed construction on several large capital projects in an effort to reduce flooding and improve water quality. In the coming year, we will undertake several additional capital construction projects, and will continue to implement the recommendations from the Battleboro Area Basin Study, with the intent of reducing flooding and improving water quality in this area. Appendix A New Development Review Data New development projects meeting rule criteria 11 494.5 New development projects requiring BMPs 7 106.87 New development projects requiring Peak Rate Match 6 II. Wet Detention Pond Stormwater Wetland Sand Filter Bioretention Grass Swales Dry Detention Pond Vegetated Filter Strip With Level Spreader Total Number of all BMPs Implemented III. Provide description of off-site options used for each project and calculations demonstrating how equivalent load reduction was achieved. Please see the following pages for nutrient loading worksheets associated with the 11 projects which were approved during the reporting period. Note: The dry ponds at Rocky Mount Mills - Mill Village, Hathaway Switching Station, & NCDOR serve as detention only. IV. Explain results of any applicable juisdictional review of planning issues. None noted. Annual Reporting Requirements for Tar-Pamlico River Basin NSW Stormwater Management Program I. Program Element: New Development Review / Approval Total # Acres Total # Projects Development Types 3 1 8 Best Management Practice (BMP) Nutrient Removal Efficiencies Number of BMPs implemented 2 2 V. VI. Total of newly completed projects 8 Projects submitting reports 65 Projects Inspected by the local government 26 Projects with significant deficiencies 6 Projects w/ significant deficiencies corrected 3 Projects w/ enforcement action taken 0 It continues to be a struggle to promptly receive all necessary documentation asssociated with newly installed BMPs. We routinely withhold certificates of occupancy and/or performance bonds until O & M documents have been provided and recorded. With that being said, there is still an overall high percentage of BMP maintenance compliance. To date, the City has not had to pursue any enforcement action to gain compliance with the Rules. However, several of the private BMPs within the City's stormwater system and subject to annual inspections did not submit an annual inspection report. If follow up with the responsible parties to these BMPs does not produce results, the City may initiate action to inspect and, if necessary, repair the privately held BMPs and bill the owners. # of Projects 2012 # of Projects 2013 # of Projects 2014 Program Element: Compliance & Enforcement # of Projects 2015 0 0 5 4 4 2 0 VII. Provide description of any construction and / or O&M compliance issues. VIII. Provide description of any enforcement actions taken and provide the current status of the enforcement action. Construction Projects with enforcement action taken for deficient stormwater systems 0 Construction Compliance & Enforcement # of Projects 2016 87 8 Construction projects completed and signed off 4 4 # of Projects 2014 0 10 # of Projects 2015 Annual Reporting Requirements for Tar-Pamlico River Basin NSW Stormwater Management Program # of Projects 2016 0 0 Operation and Maintenance Compliance & Enforcement # of Projects 2012 # of Projects 2013 5 56 5 2726 39 25 0 7 55 28 9 4 0 10 2 63 Transportation Impervious 0 0 0.32 29.36 0 Roof Impervious 0.08 0 0 20.88 0 Managed Pervious 73.47 26.1 3.26 61.37 4.24 Wooded Pervious 155.73 4.24 0 0 0.77 Transportation Impervious 1.26 0.09 0.37 0.02 29.35 0.01 Roof Impervious 0.1 0.02 0.14 0 20.89 0 Managed Pervious 74.05 27.01 0.18 0.17 61.37 0.35 Wooded Pervious 153.87 3.18 0 0 0 0 Total Project Acres 229.28 30.3 3.39 0.19 111.61 0.36 Nitrogen lbs/year 137.17 26.31 6.57 857.76 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.6 0.87 1.83 7.69 Phosphorous lbs/year 31.17 7.71 1.17 105.26 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.14 0.25 0.33 0.94 Nitrogen lbs/year 129.77 20.47 53.88 0.39 857.74 0.36 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.57 0.68 15.89 2.06 7.69 1 Phosphorous lbs/year 21.66 3.94 4.37 0.07 105.26 0.07 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.09 0.13 1.29 0.36 0.94 0.19 Number of BMPs 0 0 1 0 0 1 Nitrogen lbs/year 129.77 20.47 32.33 0.39 857.74 0.36 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.57 0.68 9.54 2.06 7.69 1 Phosphorous lbs/year 21.66 3.94 2.84 0.07 105.26 0.04 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.09 0.13 0.84 0.36 0.94 0.12 * Hospira previously purchased credits from NCEEP SECU - ATM Addition (C1)Project ID / Catchment # Battleboro Farm Solar Elec Power Plant Battleboro Solar Site Hospira Haz Storage Bldg.* BMPs Implemented Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export Post Development Project Acreage (Acres) TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE TABLE 2 NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016 Homewood Suites (C2) Pre-Development Nutrient Export Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export Homewood Suites (C1) Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres) Transportation Impervious 4.73 0 0.64 Roof Impervious 0 0 0.5 Managed Pervious 38.42 2.12 0.32 Wooded Pervious 0 0 0 Transportation Impervious 1.04 0.07 9.27 3.6 0.5 0.41 Roof Impervious 0.23 0 0.32 0.2 0 0.26 Managed Pervious 0.58 1.92 33.56 0.29 31.66 0.19 Wooded Pervious 0.00 0.35 0 0 0 0.00 Total Project Acres 2.30 2.34 6.5 4.99 31.66 0.99 Nitrogen lbs/year 166.97 21.48 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 3.87 13.02 Phosphorous lbs/year 25.82 1.78 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.6 1.08 Nitrogen lbs/year 24.5 2.29 114.64 80.89 27.25 12.75 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 10.65 0.98 17.64 16.21 0.85 12.88 Phosphorous lbs/year 2.2 0.43 8.53 6.02 5.28 1.06 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.95 0.18 1.31 1.21 0.16 1.07 Number of BMPs 1 0 1 1 0 1 Nitrogen lbs/year 14.7 2.29 85.98 60.67 27.25 10.20 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 6.39 0.98 13.23 12.16 0.85 10.31 Phosphorous lbs/year 1.43 0.43 5.12 3.61 5.28 0.85 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.62 0.18 0.79 0.72 0.16 0.86 Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres) BMPs Implemented Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export Post Development Project Acreage (Acres) TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE TABLE 2 NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY TABLE OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016 Predevelopment Nutrient Export Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export CT Trucking (C2) Hospira Haz Storage Bldg.* Lot 15C & 15D Revised for Parking (C1)Project ID / Catchment # SECU - ATM Addition (C2) SECU - ATM Addition (C3) CT Trucking (C1) Transportation Impervious 0.68 0.73 0.22 0.26 Roof Impervious 1.59 0 0 0.17 Managed Pervious 13.3 21.58 0 2.76 Wooded Pervious 0 15.09 13.56 0 Transportation Impervious 0.23 0.93 0.41 4.163 0.22 1.72 Roof Impervious 0.24 0.47 1.09 0 0.07 0.24 Managed Pervious 0.19 2.6 10.07 21.78 11.65 1.23 Wooded Pervious 0 0 0 11.48 1.84 0 Total Project Acres 0.66 4 11.57 37.39 13.78 3.19 Nitrogen lbs/year 49.23 37.32 7.89 7.78 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 3.16 1 0.57 2.44 Phosphorous lbs/year 7.98 9.71 1.15 1.33 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.51 0.26 0.08 0.42 Nitrogen lbs/year 8.52 23.67 26.89 72.24 12.09 37.22 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 12.91 5.92 2.32 1.93 0.88 11.67 Phosphorous lbs/year 0.79 3.22 4.64 11.69 2.27 3.88 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 1.19 0.81 0.4 0.31 0.16 1.22 Number of BMPs 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nitrogen lbs/year 8.52 23.67 26.89 72.24 12.09 37.22 Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 12.91 5.92 2.32 1.93 0.88 11.67 Phosphorous lbs/year 0.79 3.22 4.64 11.69 2.27 3.88 Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 1.19 0.81 0.4 0.31 0.16 1.22 Hospira Haz Storage Bldg.*NCDORProject ID / Catchment # Lot 15C & 15D Revised for Parking (C2) Rocky Mount Mill Village (C1) Rocky Mount Mill Village (C2) BMPs Implemented Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export Post Development Project Acreage (Acres) TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE TABLE 2 NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY TABLE OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016 Predevelopment Nutrient Export Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export Hathaway Switching Station Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres) Units 1422.78 Acres N lbs/yr 177.02 Sum of All Project Acres Post Development 0.36 LOADING SUMMARY CALCULATIONS N lbs/ac/yr P lbs/yr Sum of Nitrogen Load For All Projects Post Development N Load per acre per year for all Projects Post Development Sum of Phosporus Load For All Projects Post Development P Load per acre per year for all Projects Post Development 2.88 (The Categories Listed Below Are Automatically Calculated) P lbs/ac/yr 494.5 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Last Modified 9/25/2015 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Battleboro Farm Solar Electric Power Plant Date: 912512015 By: D.W.S Checked By: Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. >Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. !fall of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Formula Average EMC Column Average EMC Column <acres) l0.46 + 8.3n of TN lm!!/U (2). (3). (4) ofTP (m!!/U (2) • (3). (6) Transportation impervious 0.00 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00 Roof impervious 0.08 0.46 1.95 0.07 0.11 0.00 Managed pervious 0.00 0.46 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00 (lawn/landscaped) Managed pervious 0.00 0.46 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 (cropland) Managed pervious 73.47 0.46 2.04 69.36 0.62 21.08 (pasture) Wooded pervious 155.73 0.46 0.94 67.74 0.14 10.09 Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.00 TN Loading 137.17 TP Loading 31.17 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)= Total Area of Development= 229.28 TN Exp. Coeff. 0.60 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.14 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) = Post-development: (l) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Formula Average EMC Column Average EMC Column (acres) (0.46 + 8.31) of TN (ml!/L) (2). (3). (4) ofTP (m!!/L) (2) • (3) • (6) Transportation impervious l.26 0.51 2.60 1.67 0.19 0.12 Roof impervious 0.10 0.51 1.95 0.10 0.11 0.01 Managed pervious 74.05 0.51 1.42 53.55 0.28 10.56 Wooded pervious 153.87 0.51 0.95 74.45 0.14 10.97 Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.01 TN Loading 129.77 TP Loading 21.66 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)= Total Area of Development= 229.28 TN Exp. Coeff. 0.57 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.09 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) = Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed. Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Last Modified 7/29/2015 Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as we ll as Franklin , Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Battleboro Solar Site Date: 611512015 By: Chris Lewis, PE Checked By : __________ _ Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): >Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. >Compare total areas of development in pre-and po st-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and al so for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected . >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site , offsite catchment are a draining in must be in cluded in the acreage values and treated . Pre-development: ······························Cl).•.••••······················· ••··••••••••Tr~ 0 rn~*~PW~f:•••••••••·••• .... Trt~~~~~H~~i~#·~*~~~~tj~······· ~Wori~~&,1~tj~ ~4~1~~~~7~~ •• Mi~n~g~~ i>~l'Vi~4~•••·•••••••···. ··•••••••••••••••••·•·•(fropl~#~)···••••••••••••••••••• < ;n~:::&:~i ~~~ Post-development: ·······················•••(9 .••···························· ·····•·••IY~ tj(Lilfid Cov~t •••••• ••••••• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:::::~:::::~:f:::::~~~~~~~~~~:::::::::::::::::: •• t r~W,~~~~~~i ~#·~M~#~v~~~~··••••• 0.00 30.30 0.00 30.30 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.49 0.49 2.60 1.95 1.42 4.23 2.04 0.94 • TN~a~ing ••••••••••H 1 ~1frh 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.49 1.82 26.31 0.87 0.12 0.02 18.85 1.48 20.47 0.68 0.19 0.11 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.14 1~ ~~~l (jtj¢(t @i~~&m 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 wr~~~d,~~g ··••••t .. • .. O*f#f~ 'tf ti()~ ptj~(f; ········•@i~~(yi')••• J7(} C-01 iliriii 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.44 0.27 7.71 0.25 0.01 0.00 3.72 0.22 3.94 0.13 Note: The nutrient loading goal s are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb /ac /yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post -development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are in stalled . Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Last Modified 9/16/2015 Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Homewood Suites (Lot 2A am/ 2C) Date: 911612015 By: K. Varnell Checked By: __________ _ Directions (same/or pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. > Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: ···············•·cir•••·············· rJ;;Wf~n;a~a, fi?t~r .. • Wt~~~~~rt~~1~# ~m~~~~6=~sii 11 i•i~d,#i,1~~et~1~~~ iii ••• ••·• • ... ~~r~~~~ ~th~#~•· , •·• •·••••••••<'*~*z'~MS,f:~~~v I iii iiiiiiiiii~i~il;:~~;::11:::1::::: 1 Iii ~~~~~~ ~W'~~~ I iii f:~~~j*" i~~~t~j~~~ ~WM i ••i W#~#~i~r~~ tj~ ~~~~,#~ill~~~ #ii• 1 Post-development: ••·••··•·••-•••-•••·•m•••·•••·•·•·•·•·•·•••-•· • Jypfii(Li@I Cov~r> ~ j i ~ ~ j ~ j j j j ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ j j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ j) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~~*~~*m~~i~#~*=~~~~i#~~ ••••••••••• ~~gi i~ ~~f~iW.4~ ••••.•.•.• • i ~~~¥,~~~ ~Wi*J~ i!i i I I I •I ~g~~e,~ ~Wi~~~ii • • • •••••··~~~~tjWrii~~~~&iW4~i~1>~i•••••·• I ill~~~~~~~~ ~t~~*W.'~~111~~~¥ I . "<<:::::::::::: k~~ 0.09 3.58 0.75 3.58 ••••--•-•••J~r-·•••••·•• ·•······•··•·-<1>:•••··••-•·• ••·••• •••<~>••••••• ii@J.1~~~ r(~4£~~;3i~a ~i~mgtili~~i ~~powmri 1.20 2.60 1.20 1.95 1.20 1.42 1.20 4.23 1.20 2.04 0.94 J~~~f!~>t!, ~M ~t~~~~ff r~f~ 6.70 2.60 6.70 1.95 6.70 1.42 0.95 • ••mm~~~~r! ~~~~~W:r;[s 1.00 0.19 0.o7 0.00 0.11 0.00 5.57 0.28 1.10 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 6.57 I : I~ ~~f ~f-~1 1.17 1.83 I ~ ~~1~~1~~f~I 0.33 •@ TH • J~f. THI :~1&~i~ ';( 36.43 I 0.19 I 2.66 7.84 8.47 0.00 52.75 14.73 0.11 0.28 0.14 •1 wt ~t;.~)ri~ J.m $~~~ cb*rr. ······•••(i~i~t1#)# 0.44 1.67 0.00 4.78 1.33 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed. Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Homewood Suites (Lot 2A and 2C) Date: 911612015 By: K. Varnell Directions: Checked By:------------Last Modified 5/23/03 > It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE: Unless runoff flowing onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated. >Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list for treating the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. lfmore than one BMP is to be used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks. >Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type ofland cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue boxes. NOTE: Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP worksheet tables, and also to the site plans, for consistency. All of these values need to be the same BMP Nutrient Removal Rates Catchment I: Total acreage of catchment 1 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate = TOTAL TN REMOVAL RA TE= :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;: ~~~~'*~~~@~ ~~~~~e~ ~~~~W~s w~~~~~~~M~J~· •••w~~~ t~~~~~·~~·~~k·• ·~r~~~J~·~~J~~W~4~ fo•+ rn~M ~r~~ •~r ~~~~1~~§~@~ p~~i~*~ta11d~r~··········•••·•··· w~~ p~~e#tj~~ ~~~4. ••••• ~iJ~ill~~i~~ wki1~~J • •• ··········•··~~w~ tiit~~··•••·•······ ·•••••.••:• ~-~~e~~~ti~~····••••••••• • v~ii~t!@l F,i~t~~ siHli wl • • ··•••·••• ~~y~i$J)j~~~fr••······· ••••.••.•• pi*ifoe~~iJ~··········• 40 ac % % % % 25 40 NC BMP Manual 40 35 NC BMP Manual 35 45 NC BMP Manual 35 45 NC BMP Manual 20 20 NC BMP Manual 20 35 NC BMP Manual 10 10 NC BMP Manual First BMP's TP removal rate=--% Second BMP's TP removal rate = •.· % Third BMP's TP removal rate= > % TOT AL TP REMOVAL RA TE= 35 % .. ••·•••••m•••••••••1•••H < <~~.•<< ~1~l.ti1j~i~ 0t±~1~z m 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 Pt~;;:BMPTN L#~@/yh# j~iJ~r.1@~1 ~~~~fr\ib,@*~).~ lrJ~i'.jj!vtf:iN 1.44~ d~1frj# J~~J~~Md~ ~i\i~frHbi~0f~)~ 37.70 8.20 4.97 0.00 3.01 53.88 15.89 32.33 9.54 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 rr~-~~P:j;~ J:itj~4 (llilyrk ~dfoaM#±l1 ~6~Jti~M>4 ~riit~#t:~h E.~i>!i~ K1b,i~iY~H 2.76 0.46 0.98 0.00 0.17 4.37 1.29 2.84 0.84 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Catchment 2: Total acreage of catchment 2 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate= TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= ....... >m . ·····•·••••rt~~~1i;;a,~~c;~m •••••trans~Jr~~tiJ~~~J~NWli~····· ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • • • • • ~~tjr iM#~~·~J~ • • •. • • ~~~~~~~~4~~~···· •. •. Wo~~~~ ~~*~~s ••••• Wr~~ t~~~~##·~~·~~r Catchment 3: Total acreage of catchment 3 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate= TOTAL TN REMOVAL RA TE= ••••••• ±~e~tWJ,ti~ ¢~~~~ •·•Wa~~*-i.~B.~w~~J~~i~~~-··•• ~JJm~JJWiJJ~ •••••• N'~~~~~ll:~t,ryW~$•••••···· .•..•.• ~~?~~~~~@~J,¥•••······· •••~~~~ t~~~*~•~~·~m••••· •mr~~~?:~•~*=P~hi~~~J~>µ,!•• 0 ------0 ac % fa>< BMP• TP ;omo,,J "" -t• r % Second BMP's TP removal rate= :i' , ' "o;': % % Third BMP's TP removal rate= •• , , ;, ~ ,,._:;' % % TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= 0 % ·~~~~~s~~l~lntr±~g[~~~ 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 ac % % % % 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 P:i~~~iN 1.1~~ dl#frf# *+~mr~.~ij; :rJ~ksi\iliHH~I ··~(i~b# ? r~~t:#Mfi# E;iJ;~r! (!~l~<!:Y'J. ~ 0.07 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.39 2.06 0.39 2.06 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 • • • H J?i~~JjMV: l:~ •H ~J.~d.Q.~MH ~~~~~~ ~~ E~pQ~ ,',', )~iii¥h"' . •. •. r~~ti~Mr, 'i:F, Jµtj~4 (.Wl)ir:H #~1,~m~[~~~~ e;,,, BMP', TP '="'' raIB--% Second BMP's TP removal rate= % Third BMP's TP removal rate= % TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= 0 % ••••••••••m•••••••••1•·•••••••·••~1~.·•••••• s~m14t!~j~~~ ~vf~~~z ·······(~} ........ , .. ·······••(6.)••········· A#f~f~M9~i ••••••TP<mi!'J.L1••••• 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 • Pt~~:BiVIP. TN 1,~@f:fr).µ ~-~~~~~.~~~~I ifo~t&Mf:iN 1.1~~ (li#jiffi. ~W,:,;~~~~~ 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 • • li~h~i\Jidi~ •• ~b,~4@1rn~ ~~·#mrt.b~~~Wia H• ·~<J~@Mr±ii •H ~J.~d. Q.~iYhY ~~1-~m~~M~r~r: Last Modified 5/23/03 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.o7 0.36 0.07 0.36 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments: · · · · · · · · · · · · ·· ··· · · · ·· · c~itifiti~rit ro:st~:&Mli • r~~~nMr • . . !: F~r<~~f~f ~ t~f.l.i.)~B~ ~~V:~td~~~~t A.ct~~~~ • • • tiiN !iW~d.i~i • tP: L.J.~~~~g • ... ·.·.·.·.·.·. ... (i)ii!~\<MF • (ibfa~irrf • 3.58 9.54 0.84 0.19 2.06 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 9.16 0.81 Last Modified 5/23/03 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then the BMPs planned are adequate. Otherwise, additional BMPs and/or modifications in development plans are required. P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com November 2, 2015 Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate Prepared by MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC Unique Hotels, LLC 1101 Royal Ridge Drive Rocky Mount, NC, 27804 Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184 Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 552.04 (lbs -N) and 5.58 (lbs - P) 8 digit-HUC: 03020101 Tar-Pamlico River Basin You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient mitigation requirements for the Homewood Suites Project by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. This Bank has received full payment towards the nutrient offset requirement for the above referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 552.04 lbs of nitrogen and 37.59 lbs of phosphorous. Please note that the full amount of Phosphorus Offset required for this project, as specific by the City of Rocky Mount’s authorization letter, has not been fully achieved through this transaction. To comply with the authorization letter, and additional 32.01 lbs of Phosphorus Offset must be obtained through other sources. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111. Sincerely, Rich Mogensen, President cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator RECEIPT NUTRIENT OFFSET PAYMENT November 2, 2015 Bharat Patel Unique Hotels, LLC 1101 Royal Ridge Drive Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Project Name: Homewood Suites Local Government: City of Rocky Mount Local Government Transaction Number: NP15102701 Basin: Tar-Pamlico 10-digit Catalog Unit: 0302010102 Phosphorous 32.01 Pounds @ $349.62/lb= $11,191.34 Check Number: 1009 Amount Paid: $11,191.34 The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has received payment for nutrient offset for the above referenced project. Nutrient offset payments made to DMS as part of fulfilling the requirements of the Tar-Pamlico River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy shall be at a rate specified in 15A NCAC 02R .0602. The DMS, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the Division is responsible for the nutrient offset requirements indicated above as required by the approval conditions. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including G.S. § 143-214.11. Payments into the Nutrient Offset Program are not transferable. Refunds of payments made to DMS are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must be submitted in accordance with the Division’s refund policy at www.nceep.net. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707-8915 or kelly.williams@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Michael Ellison Director cc: Donald Perry, PE- Rocky Mount Kevin Varnell- Stocks Engineering Hazardous Storage Building Hospira Incorporated Rev. December 10, 2015 Page 6 3.1 STORMWATER QUALITY & QUANTITY This small project will be a nearly imperceptible impact to stormwater quantity and quality but it is but one set of improvements to be carried out concurrently with the R3 project. In order to show the total impact of these two projects in one location for City review, we have compiled the project information of the R3 project provided by Jacobs with the project information for this submittal. The total development of built-upon area which is underway or under review is as follows: 3.01 PRIOR TO R3 PROJECT – PREDEVELOPMENT:  Transportation Impervious 27.41 acres  Roof Impervious 19.83 acres  Managed Pervious 64.37 acres  Total Site Area 111.61 acres  Percentage Impervious 42%  Total Impervious Surface 47.24 acres 3.02 AFTER R3 PROJECT IS COMPLETE:  Transportation Impervious 29.36 acres  Roof Impervious 20.88 acres  Managed Pervious 61.37 acres  Total Site Area 111.61 acres  Percentage Impervious 45%  Total Impervious Surface 50.24 acres  Total Increase in Impervious 3.00 acres 3.03 AFTER HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT IS COMPLETE:  Transportation Impervious 29.35 acres  Roof Impervious 20.89 acres  Managed Pervious 61.37 acres  Total Site Area 111.61 acres  Percentage Impervious 45%  Total Impervious Surface 50.24 acres  Total Increase in Impervious 0.00 acres  Total Increase as compared to Predevelopment: 3.00 acres Since nutrient export is calculated based upon impervious surfaces, it is evident that the Hazardous Storage Facility will reduce the nutrient export for this project. This reduction is caused by the elimination of unneeded impervious surface in the form of a portion of the ABC stone access area that is to be removed by the project. 3.04 CHANGE IN NUTRIENT LOADING DUE TO THE HW STORAGE BUILDING: Our understanding is that the nutrient strategy described in the Jacobs report entitled SVP Modernization; R1 Addition was approved by the City. This project will not increase the pounds of nutrients to be purchased as summarized in the report. Hazardous Storage Building Hospira Incorporated Rev. December 10, 2015 Page 7 The nutrient calculation for the project is attached showing the finished impervious surfaces proposed by Jacobs as the PRE-DEVELOPMENT condition. The Hazardous Building project results in a very slight reduction in nutrient export. The Jacobs report indicates the following nutrient loading for the R3 project: A. Nutrient Loading due to the R3 Project Approved in April 2015 Nitrogen Total Post-Development Nitrogen 2013 8,791.20 Total Post-Development Nitrogen Incl. R3 8,916.30 Needed to be purchased 125.10 lbs. Phosphorous Total Post-Development Nitrogen 2013 118.20 Total Post-Development Nitrogen Incl. R3 125.70 Needed to be purchased 7.50 lbs. B. Nutrient Loading due This Building Project There is a slight reduction in nutrients because a very tiny fraction of transportation impervious is converted to roof (=0.1 Ac.) and roof exports lower levels of nutrients than transportation (roadway). Refer to the attached nutrient calculation sheet for the changes due to this project: Change in Nitrogen Generation Post-Development Nitrogen given for the R3 Project 857.76 lbs. per year Post-Development Nitrogen given for HW Storage Facility 856.74 lbs. per year Net Reduction in Nitrogen to be Purchased 0.02 lbs. per year Total Reduction @ 30 Years 0.60 lbs. Change in Phosphorous Generation Post-Development Nitrogen given for the R3 Project 105.26 lbs. per year Post-Development Nitrogen given for HW Storage Facility 105.26 lbs. per year Net Reduction in Nitrogen to be Purchased 0.00 lbs. per year Total Reduction @ 30 Years No Change C. Nutrient Loading due to Both R3 and Hazardous Building Project The net nutrient generation requiring purchase after this project (including the R3 Project in the Jacobs Report): Nitrogen = 125.10 lbs. – 0.60 lbs. = 124.50lbs. Phosphorous = 7.50 lbs. – No Change Hazardous Storage Building Hospira Incorporated Rev. December 10, 2015 Page 8 SUMMARY This project is for the addition of a stand alone ATM machine and its associated driveway. The ATM drive will be located at the SECU Peele Road entrance and will run along Peele Road and have an exit onto Peele Road. The drive will be 12' wide and be only one way. This project will add approximately 1,517 square feet of impervious surface to the site. The site plan was originally designed and permitted in 2007 by EcoEngineering (part of the John R. McAdams Company) in March of 2010. The approved design called for a large wetland BMP to provide stormwater quantity control and stormwater quality treatment for nitrogen and phosphorous . The BMP was designed for the credit union bu i lding and parking lot and the addit ional undeveloped 1.89 acres west of the credit union but still the same parcel of land . This means that the small addition of the ATM and drive lane do not require separate BMPs because there is enough existing capacity to handle them. Excerpts from the previously approved stormwater manual are included. To check the nitrogen and phosphorous calculations the previously approved post developed calculations were inputted into the spreadsheet as the predeveloped condition. The additional impervious associated with the ATM was added to the post developed condition . The resulting site totals of 3.47 lbs/ac/yr of nitrogen and 0.38 lbs/ac/yr of phosphorous are below the threshold limit and do not require buy down payments . The ATM drive pipe capacity was checked using Hydraflow Storm Sewers software program. Rainfall data for Rocky Mount was used . The rational method was used to determine the amount of storm water runoff. Calculations were run for the 10, 25, and 50 year storm. The pipe a has ample capacity to handle the 50 year storm and still function in a non-pressurized open channel flow condition . The following pages include: • Tar/Pam spreadsheet ATM addition • Storm sewer pipe calculations Previous stormwater calculations (EcoEngineering) • Cover • Stormwater narrative • Drainage Map • Design calculations • Design calculations-future development • NC DENR wetland design sheet • As built stormwater wetland • As built stormwater wetland -future development • Tar/Pam spread sheet • Tar/Pam spread sheet-future development ,· ' )\'I' • : !--~(. Pnedml!}m <Olf Hue lfm -I ~mllk<l} Rn~,e~· lS:2shL. Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky i\l~!nt al~!:£~.!:_oas-~.~~~as ~~in ,0as h ,::n.5!_!~~~-?.~~~:,:;.~"'""' !Total Nitrogen ai!]d TotaB JP'hosplhloms JLoadhllg CaRcuHatio[g 'VVorksll!eet r(!,.lil~oma[e.J) ; Project Name: _ __::·_::_·_'__::_''--'----------- Date: · • ,., By : .:)•' ~>!d,·:·:'i!!(, _o ,r.~ Checked By : ----- Directions (same for pre-development alld post-developmellt tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. >Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans . !fall of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. > Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through th e site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. · 1 ~o~ti~~er#i~~~ ) ··············~~~~~#·w.~~~i?@ !········· ........ ' ~~-i O;,cJll Qf(ID. · .. j'~~(A;·~~ #t' Pey~i()~n1e~¢ ~ 5.00 _, M 0.46 tJll 0.46 2.65 2.65 l 9 1 1.42 0.95 TN Loa din¢ (lb /;yr')"' TN Exp. Coeff, (tb/~c/y.r) =i P oa lb (J 0 T L ( p 24 0 0 0 13 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb /ac/yr for TN ancl 0.4 lb/Qc/yr for TP . If the post-deve lopment nutrient lo8cling is below these levels, then no BMP is 11ecessary Otherwise the next wo;·ksheet calculates post-developmenr TN <llld TP lo ~ding ' <lfter BMP~ are inswlled I c Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28.0258 Piedmont oftbe Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Project Name: SECU-ATM ADDITION Date : 12122120 IS By : BJK Last Modified 5/23/03 Counties Checked By : __________ _ It may he advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow development to be split into as many as three catchments , and can he copied for greater than three . NOTE : Unless runoff flowing the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site , the offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated . Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank . Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4 .0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4lb/aciyr TP, select BMP(s) from the list the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks. Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light NOTE : Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP lw<>rk,,heet tables, and also to the site All of these values need to be the same BMP Nutrient Removal Rates Catchment 1: Total acreage of catchment I First BMP's TN removal rate Second BMP's TN removal rate Third BMP's TN removal rate TOTALTNREMOVALRATE=--~~-- acO•~ % % % % 40 35 35 45 35 45 20 20 20 35 10 10 First BMP's TP removal rate Second BMP's TP removal rate Third BMP's TP removal rate TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= 1.95 0.00 1.42 0.34 0.94 0.00 NC BMP Manual NC BMP Manual NC BMP Manual NC BMP Manual NC BMP Manual NC BMP Manual %,~ % % % 0.11 0.00 0 .28 O.o? 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.19 0.04 0.12 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 \llk o-:t3 D ·~ ().0 D·'f5 o.D'J o.vD \·9~ 0·3'5 o.o Catchment 2: Total acreage of catchment 2 First BMP's TN removal rate Second BMP's TN removal rate Third BMP's TN removal rate TOTALTNREMOVALRATE =----~-- ~~~~+.+~~~~ Tota I acreage of catchment 3 First BMP's TN removal rate Second BMP's TN removal rate Third BMP's TN removal rate TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 2 .3 y.O 5.05 5.05 5.05 ac:J..3~ % % % % 0.71 0.71 0.71 First BMP's TP removal rate Second BMP's TP removal rate Third BMP's TP removal rate TOTALTPREMOVALRATE=----~~--- 1.95 2.26 0.11 1.42 4.16 0.28 0.94 0.00 0.14 First BMP's TP removal rate Second BMP's TP removal rate Third BMP's TP removal rate TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= 1.95 0.00 0.11 1.42 1.93 0.28 0.94 0.23 0.14 Last Modified 5/23/03 0.13 0.82 0.00 0.25 2.20 0.95 1.43 0.62 % % % % 0.00 0.38 0.03 0.00 0.43 0.18 0.43 0.18 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28.0258 Last Modified 5/23/03 3.47 :;:::;:;:;:::;:;:-:.:--:-:;:<··················· w.~ ~~~R~~~*=r~~i$ s.oo 0.38 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0 .4lb/ac/yr for TP . Iftbe post-development nutrient loading is below tbese levels, tben tbe BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, additional BMPs and/or modifications in development plans are required . ADDENDUM TO STORMWATER CALCULATIONS C.T. TRUCKING Fountain Industri al Park Rocky Mount, NC ACE J N: 15.065 v. 1 .0, 9.30 .15 v. 2.0, 10 .22.15 v.3 .0, 3 .18.16 Revised stormwater nutrient calculations herein are based on the acquisition of the additional adjacent 14.67 acres in Fountain Industrial Park. Total Area = 28.48 + 14 .67 = 43.15 ac CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA CIVIl, MUNICIPAl & STRUCTURAl ENGINEERS COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAl SERVICES P.O. Box 7966 • Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Phone : (252) 972-7703 Fax :(252)972-7638 www.appianengineers.com Tar-Pamlico StormwaterRule 15A NCAC 28.0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Mount and Tarboro as well as Project Name: CT Trucking-Fountain Industrial Park-including adjacent property of 14.67 acres Date : 3.18.16 Last Modified 3/18/2016 Counties By: Appian Consulting Engineers, dcr Checked By :----------- ID.irt>,('fi•1n.~ (same for pre-development and post-development tables): Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue . Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consi stency with site plans . If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected . Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must included in the values and treated . 1.37 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00 1.37 1.42 74.79 0.28 14.75 1.37 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.37 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.37 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00 : ~: ~~~~ii~ r~~~!-Y!q~~4H: ~: 0.11 15.98 : :t~~ :~!"~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ : 43.15 0.37 2.31 1.95 1.44 0.11 0.08 2.31 1.42 109.93 0.28 21.68 2.31 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00 ::: ~r~c~~ ~~P~rri~t.~:(l) ~::: 0.22 25.82 : :to:t~i :A.re~:~t ~~v~~p~~"~ ~ : 43.15 0.60 Note: The nutrient loading goal s are 4 .0 lb/ac /yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels , then no BMP is necessary . Otherwi se, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed. Tar-Pamlico Storrnwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Incl udes Oxford, Henderson, Mount an d Tarboro as well as BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name : CT Trucking at FIP-WET PONDS, including adj. 14.67 acres Date : 3.18.16 Counties By : Appian Consulting Engineers, dcr Checked By :----------- Last Mod ifie d 5/23/03 It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs . The tables below allow development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three . NOTE : Unless runoff flowing the development from offsite is routed separately aro und or through the site , the offsite catchment area draining in must be in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated . A bove ea ch t able: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP coefficients you calculated above to the ru le requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP , se lect BMP(s) from the list for the catchment runoff Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks . If more than one BMP is to be in series, the combined removal rates will be calcu late d automaticall y in the blue blanks . Catchment Tables : Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue NOTE : Compare the Total Catchment Ac reage for th e Deve lopme nt (final table) to the value yo u established in the pre-BMP l w.~rk<h ,,t tables , and also to the site All BMP Nutrient Removal Rates Catchment 1: Total acreage of catchment I = First BMP's TN removal rate = Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate = TOTALTNREMOVALRATE =--~~-- ...... 0 ••••• 0 • • • • • • • •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... • 0 • 0 ••••••• 0 •••• 0 •• 0 • 0 0 ••••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 ••••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0 7.22 7.22 7.22 40 35 35 45 35 45 20 20 20 35 NC BMP Manua l 10 10 NC BMP Manua l First BMP's TP removal ra te = % Second BMP's TP removal rate = % Third BMP's TP removal rate = % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RAT E=-----------% 1.95 1.69 0.11 0.10 1.42 3.18 0.28 0.63 0.94 0.00 0.1 4 0.00 0.72 8.53 1.31 5.12 0.79 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Catchment 2: Total acreage of catchment 2 = ac First BMP's TN removal rate = % Second BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TN removal rate = % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE = _ ___;::..:... __ % Total acreage of catchment 3 = First BMP's TN removal rate Second BMP's TN removal rate Third BMP's TN removal rate TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE = _ __::....__ O.o2 32.16 ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •• • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •• • • • • 0 ••• 0 • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •• •• 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • •••• • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •• 0 •••••••• 0 • • • • • 0 •••• 6.79 6.79 6.79 0.59 0.59 0.59 First BMP's TP removal rate = % Second BMP's TP removal rate % Third BMP's TP removal rate % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= __ ___.:.:;___ __ % 1.95 2.65 1.42 2.80 0.94 0.00 First BMP's TP removal rate = Second BMP's TP removal rate = T hird BMP's TP removal rate = 0.11 0.28 0.14 TOTAL TP R EMOVAL RATE =-----=--- 1.95 0.00 0.11 1.42 26.49 0.28 0.94 0.00 0.14 Last Modified 5/23/03 0.15 0.55 0.00 0.67 6.02 1.21 3.61 0.72 0.00 5.22 0.00 0.00 5.28 0.16 5.28 0.16 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : btte,int!nt: : ~o.st~~M"~: : : : : I>J>st~MF: : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~:~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~it~:~7~ ~ 6.50 13.23 0.79 4.99 12.16 0.72 31.66 0.85 0.16 43.15 4.02 0.32 Last Modified 5/23/03 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then the BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, additional BMPs and /or modifications in development plans are required . P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com 1 April, 2016 Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate Prepared by MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC Purchaser Address: CT Management Inc. PO Box 850 Claremont, NC 28610 Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184 Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 25.89 (lbs -N) 8 digit-HUC: 03020101 Tar-Pamlico River Basin You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient and/or buffer mitigation requirements for the CT Trucking – Fountain Industrial Park by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. This Bank has received full payment towards the nutrient offset requirement for the above referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 25.89 lbs of nitrogen. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111. Sincerely, Rich Mogensen, President cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com June 28, 2016 Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate Prepared by MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC Mr. Robbie B. Davis Wright Development Corporation PO Box 7515 Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184 Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 46.04 (lbs -N) 8 digit-HUC: 03020101 Tar-Pamlico River Basin You have elected to fulfill your permitted Nitrogen offset mitigation requirements for the Merchant Court Parking Lot by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. This Bank has received full payment towards the Nitrogen offset requirement for the above referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 46.04 lbs of nitrogen and 6.44 lbs of phosphorous. Please note that you will need to purchase Phosphorus credits from another agency in order to fully satisfy the mitigation requirements for your project. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111. Sincerely, Rich Mogensen, President cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator II fl CoulterJ Jewell f Thames ," Project Name : Rocky Mount Mills -Village Project Number: 1445 By : CLJ Date: 02 .10 .16 Nutrient Analysis Summary .::>11e t-'os1 ueve1opmem NUtnem Export lb/ac/yr Nitrogen 3.16 Phosphorus 0.51 lsite Area I Export Limits (lbs/ac/yr) Project Location I Nitrogen Phosphorus Tar-Pamlico I 4 .0 0.4 Resulting Nutrient Export for treatment (lbs/ac/yr) Nitrogen none Phosphorus 0.11 Nutrient Export reduction to be met with offsite payment (lbs) Nitrogen none Phosphorus 51.38 Revised : Date: II 15.57 acres Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Last Modified 2/10/2016 Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Rocky Mount Mill -Village Date: 02.10.16 By : CLJ Checked By: __________ _ Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue . > Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: (3) (4) S.M. Formula Average EMC 0.46 + 8.31 of TN m Transportation impervious 1.67 2.60 2.96 0.19 0.22 Roof impervious 1.67 1.95 5.18 0.11 0.29 1.67 1.42 31.57 0.28 6.22 1.67 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.67 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.67 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00 Fraction Impervious (I) = 0.15 TN Loading 39.71 TPLoading 6.73 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)= Total Area of Development = 15.57 TN Exp. Coeff. 2.55 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.43 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) = Post-development: (3) (4) Transportation impervious 2.01 2.60 7.00 0.19 0.51 Roof impervious 2.01 1.95 6.11 0.11 0.34 2.01 1.42 36.12 0.28 7.12 2.01 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00 7.98 0.51 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed . Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Rocky Mount Mill -Village Date: 02.10.16 By : CI.J Directions: Checked By : __________ _ Last Modified 5/23/03 > It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE: Unless runoff flowing onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated. > Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list for treating the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks. > Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue boxes. NOTE: Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP worksheet tables , and also to the site plans, for consistency. All of these values need to be the_s_a_m_e-.------------~ p Design Standard BMP NC BMP Manual Nutrient Stormwater Wetland 40 35 NC BMP Manual Removal Sand Filter 35 45 NC BMP Manual Rates Bioretention 35 45 NC BMP Manual Grass Swale 20 20 NC BMP Manual tated Filter Strip w/ 20 35 NC BMP Manual Level Spreader Dry Detention 10 10 NC BMP Manual Catchment I: Total acreage of catchment I = ac First BMP's TN removal rate = % First BMP's TP removal rate= % Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate = % Third BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TP removal rate = % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= % (1) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC of 0.46 + 8.31 TN m Transportation impervious 3.37 2.60 8.15 0.19 0.60 Roof impervious 3.37 1.95 3.09 0.11 0.17 Managed pervious 3.37 1.42 12.44 0.28 2.45 Wooded pervious 3.37 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00 Area taken up by BMP 3.37 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00 Fraction Impervious (I) = 0.35 Pre-BMPTN 23.67 Pre-BMPTP 3.22 Load (lb/yr) = Load (lb/yr) = Total Area of Development = 4.00 Pre·BMPTN 5.92 Pre-BMPTP 0.81 Export (lb/ac/yr) = Export (lb/ac/yr) = 23.67 Post-BMPTP 3.22 Load (lb/yr) = Load (lb/yr) = Post·BMPTN 5.92 Post-BMPT 0.81 Export (lb/ac/yr) Export (lb/ac/yr) Ta r-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Catchment 2 : Total acreage of catchm ent 2 = ac First BMP's TN removal rate = % Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Th ird BMP's TN removal rate = % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % ----- (1) Type of Land Cover Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed pervious Wooded pervious Area taken up by BMP Fraction Impervious (I ) = Total Area of Development= 11.57 Catchment 3: Total acreage of catchment 3 = ac First BMP's TN removal rate = % Second BMP's TN removal rate = % Thi rd BMP's TN removal ra te = % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % ----- (1) Type of Land Cover Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed pervious Wooded pervious Area taken up by BMP Fraction Impervious (I ) = Total Area of Development = First BMP's TP removal rate = Second BMP's TP removal rate = Third BMP's TP removal rate= TOTAL TP REMOVAL RA TE = 5) 1.64 3.27 21 .98 0.00 0.00 26.89 Pre-HMP TN Ex port 2.32 (lb/ac/yr ) = Post-BMPTN 26.89 Load (lb/yr ) = Poot·BMP TN 2.32 Export (lb/ac/yr) First BMP's TP removal ra te= Second BMP's TP removal rate = Third BMP's TP removal rate= TOTAL TPREMOVALRATE= 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 0 (6) 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 Pre-BMPTP Load (lb/yr ) = Prt-HMP T P Ex port (lb/ac/yr ) = Post-BMP T P Load (lb/yr ) = Post·BMP TP Expor (lb/ac/yr ) 0 (6) 0.11 0.28 0 .14 0.11 Pre-BMPTP Load (lb/yr ) = Pre-HMP T P Ex port (lb/ac/yr ) = Post-BMPTP Load (lb/yr) = Post-BMP TP Ex po (l b/ac/yr ) Last Modified 5/23103 % % % % (7 ) 0.12 0.18 4 .33 0.00 0.00 4.64 0.40 4.64 0.40 % % % % (7) Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Weighted A verage of N utrient Loadings from the Catchments: Catchment 1 Catchment 2 Catchment 3 TOTAL FOR DEVELOPMENT Cate Ac ~ __,.._.,., .,,,.-. --,,. ':: ": -.... ..-;~· ..... ~ ... ~ ::· ~~~ ' . ·:;, ,~.&·~=-·~. ~···j 4.01 5.92 0.81 11.57 2.32 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.58 3.25 0.51 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels , then the BMPs planned are adequate. Othe1wi se, additional BMPs and/or modifications in de velopment plans are required . Last Mod ified 5/23/03 P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com April 21, 2016 Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate Prepared by MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC Rocky Mount Mill, LLC. 2619 Western Blvd. Raleigh, NC, 27606 Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184 Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 44.61 (lbs - P) 8 digit-HUC: 03020101 Tar-Pamlico River Basin You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient and/or buffer mitigation requirements for the Rocky Mount Mill (Mill Village along River Drive) project by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. This Bank has received full payment towards a portion of the phosphorus offset requirement for the above referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 51.38 lbs of phosphorous. As Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. is only able to provide 44.61 lbs of phosphorus at this time, please note that the remaining balance must be obtained from another source in order to fully comply with the specified mitigation requirements. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111. Sincerely, Rich Mogensen, President cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Last Modified 2/22/2016 Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Hathaway Switching Station Date : 212612016 By : Doug Chalmers Checked By : Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): ~~~~~~~~~~- > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue . > Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans . If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. > Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site , offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acrea e values and treated . Pre-development: (1) Type of Land Cover Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed pervious (lawn/landscaped) Managed pervious (cropland) Managed pervious (pasture) Wooded perv ious Fraction Impervious (I)= Total Area of Development= Post-development: (l) Type of Land Cover Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed perviou s Wooded pervious Fraction Impervious (I)= Total Area of Development= (2) Area O.o2 37.39 (2) Area 0.11 37.39 (3) (4) S.M. Formula Average EMC 0.46 + 8.3I of TN m /L 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 (3) 2.60 1.95 1.42 4.23 2.04 0.94 TN Loading (lb/yr)= TN Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) = (4) S.M. Formula Average EMC 0.46 + 8.3I of TN m /L 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.95 TN Loading (lb/yr)= TN Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) = (5) 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.34 8.81 37.32 1.00 (5) 14.78 0.00 42.60 15.02 72.40 1.94 (6) Average EMC ofTP m /L 0.19 0.11 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.14 TP Loading (lb/yr)= TP Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) = (6) 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 TP Loading (lb/yr)= TP Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) = (7) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.31 1.31 9.71 0.26 (7) 1.08 0.00 8.40 2.21 11.69 0.31 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0 .4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nu tri ent loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings afte r BMPs are installed. Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: In c lud es Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mo unt and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name : Hathaway Switching Station Date : 112611016 By Doug Chalmers Dire ctions: Checked By : ___________ _ Last Mod ified 5/23/03 > It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables be low allow the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE Unless runoff flowing onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated . >A bove each table : Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blan k. Based on a comparison of the post-d evelo pment TN and TP export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4 .0 lb /ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb /ac /yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list fo r treating the catchment runoff Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks . >C atchment T ables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue boxes. NOTE Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP worksheet tables, and also to the site plans , for consistency. All of these values need to be the same BMP Nutrient Removal Rates Catchment I: W e t Detentio n P ond Stormwa t e r Wetl a nd Sand F ilter Bi o r etenti on G rass Swale V eget a t e d F ilte r Strip w / Level S preader D ry Detentio n Total acreage of catch ment I = ac First BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TN removal rate= % TOT AL TN REMOVAL RA TE = 0 % ----- (1) (3) T y pe of L and Cover Transportation impervio u s 1.38 Roof impe rvio u s 1.38 M anaged pervio u s 1.38 W oo ded pervi ou s l.38 A rea taken up by BMP 1.38 Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.1 l Total Area of Develo pment = 37.39 TN TP Design Standard 25 40 NC B M P M anual 40 35 NC BMP M anual 35 45 NC B MP Manu a l 35 45 NC B M P Manu a l 20 20 NC B M P Manual 20 35 NC B M P M anual 10 10 NC B M P M anual First BMP's TP removal rate = % Second BMP's TP removal rate = % Third BMP's TP removal rate= % TOT AL TP REMOVAL RA TE= 0 % ------- (4) (5) (6) (7) 2.60 14.78 0.1 9 1.08 1.95 0.00 0 .11 0 .00 1.42 42.60 0 .28 8.40 0 .9 4 14.86 0 .14 2.21 l.95 0.00 O.ll 0.00 P r e-BMPTN 72.24 P r e-BM PTP 11.69 Load (lb/yr)= Load (lb/y r )= P re-BMPTN 1.93 P re-BMP TP 0.31 Export (lb/ac/yr) = Ex port (lb/ac/yr) = P os t-BMP TN 72.24 Post-BMP TP 11.69 Load (lb/yr) = Load (l b/y r ) = Post-BMPTN 1.93 Post-BM P T P 0 .31 Export (lb/a d yr) = Export (lb/ac/y r) = Tar-Pamlico Storm water Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Catchment 2: Total acreage of catchment 2 = ac First BMP's TN removal rate = % Second BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TN removal rate= % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % ----- (I) (3) First BMP's TP removal rate= Second BMP's TP removal rate= Third BMP's TP removal rate= TOTALTPREMOVALRATE = (4) (5) Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC o Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed pervious Wooded pervious Area taken up by BMP Fraction Impervious (I)= Total Area of Development= Catchment 3: 0.00 0.46 + 8.31 TN m /L 2.60 l.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 Pre-BMPTN Load (lb/yr) = Pre-BMP TN Export (lblac/yr) = Post-BMPTN Load (lb/yr) = Post·BMPTN Export (lblac/yr) = Total acreage of catchment 3 = ac First BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TN removal rate= % TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % ----- (I) (3) First BMP's TP removal rate= Second BMP's TP removal rate = Third BMP's TP removal rate= TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= (4) (5) Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC o Transportation impervious Roof impervious Managed pervious Wooded pervious Area taken up by BMP Fraction Impervious (I)= Total Area of Development= 0.00 0.46 + 8.31 TN m /L 2.60 1.95 l.42 0.94 l.95 Pre-BMPTN Load (lb/yr) = Pre-BMP TN Export (lb/aclyr) = Post-BMPTN Load (lb/yr) = Post-BMPTN Export (lblac/yr) = Last Modified 5/23/03 % % % 0 % (6) (7) Average EMC o TP m /L 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 Pre-BMPTP Load (lb/yr) = Pre-BMP TP Export (lb/ac/yr) = Post-BMP TP Load (lb/yr) = Post-BMP TP Export (lb/ac/yr) = % % % 0 % (6) (7) Average EMC o TP m /L 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 Pre-BMPTP Load (lb/yr)= Pre-BMP TP Export (lb/ac/yr) = Post-BMP TP Load (lb/yr)= Post-BMP TP Export (lb /aclyr) = Tar-Pamlico Stormwa ter R ule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Last Mod ified 5/23 /03 Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments: C a tc hm en t Post-BMP P os t-BMP Acreage TN Loading T P Loading (lb/ac/yr) (lb/a c/yr) Catchm ent I 37.39 1.93 0.31 C atchment 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cat chment 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOT AL F OR DEVELOPMENT 37.39 1.93 0.31 Note : The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb /ac /yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac /yr for TP . If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels , then the BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, addit ional BMPs and /or modifications in development plans are required . Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 2B .0258 Last Modified 8/2/2016 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name:Rocky Mount Academy - Parcel # 018672 (southern-most tract) Date:7/8/2016 By:T. Andy Lamm, PE Checked By: Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): Pre-development: (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) Area (acres) S.M. Formula (0.46 + 8.3I) Average EMC of TN (mg/L) Column (2) * (3) * (4) Average EMC of TP (mg/L) Column (2) * (3) * (6) 0.22 0.59 2.60 0.34 0.19 0.02 0.00 0.59 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.59 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.59 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00 13.56 0.59 0.94 7.55 0.14 1.13 0.02 TN Loading (lb/yr) =7.89 TP Loading (lb/yr) =1.15 13.78 TN Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) =0.57 TP Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) =0.08 Post-development: (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) Area (acres) S.M. Formula (0.46 + 8.3I) Average EMC of TN (mg/L) Column (2) * (3) * (4) Average EMC of TP (mg/L) Column (2) * (3) * (6) 0.22 0.64 2.60 0.36 0.19 0.03 0.07 0.64 1.95 0.09 0.11 0.01 11.65 0.64 1.42 10.52 0.28 2.07 1.84 0.64 0.95 1.11 0.14 0.16 0.02 TN Loading (lb/yr) =12.09 TP Loading (lb/yr) =2.27 13.78 TN Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) =0.88 TP Exp. Coeff. (lb/ac/yr) =0.16 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed. Roof impervious Type of Land Cover Managed pervious Managed pervious (cropland) (1) Transportation impervious > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. > Compare total areas of development in pre- and post- tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. > Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. (1) Type of Land Cover Managed pervious (pasture) Transportation impervious Total Area of Development = Fraction Impervious (I) = Managed pervious (lawn/landscaped) Wooded pervious Total Area of Development = Wooded pervious Fraction Impervious (I) = Roof impervious 2016-01587 Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 2B .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford,Henderson,Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin,Nash and Edgecome Counties Last Modified 4/25/2016 Total Nitrogen andTotal Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name:NCDOR Date: By:Murk Russell, PE Checked By: Directions (samefor pre-development andpost-development tables): >Enter the acres of each type of land cover inthe green boxes.The spreadsheet will calculate allofthe values in light blue. >Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)),and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage ontothe development from offsite is diverted around or through thesite,offsite catchment area draining inmust be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: (1) Type of Land Cover (2) Area (acres) (3) S.M.Formula (0.46 +8.31) (4) Average EMC ofTN(mg/L) (5) Column (2W3W4) (6) Average EMC ofTP(mg/L) (7) Column (2)* (3)*(6) Transportation impervious 1.58 2.60 1.07 0.19 0.08 Roof impervious 1.58 1.95 0.52 0.11 0.03 Managed pervious (lawn/landscaped)1.58 1.42 6.19 0.28 1.22 Managed pervious (cropland)1.58 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 Managed pervious (pasture)1.58 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00 Wooded pervious 1.58 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00 Fraction Impervious (I) =0.13 TN Loading (Ib/yr)=7.78 TP Loading (Ib/yr)=1.33 Total Area of Development =3.19 TN Exp.Coeff. (Ib/ac/yr)=2.44 TP Exp.Coeff. (Ib/ac/yr)=0.42 Post-development: (1) Type of Land Cover (2) Area (acres) (3) S.M.Formula (0.46 +8.31) (4) Average EMC ofTN(mg/L) (5) Column (2)* (3)*(4) (6) Average EMC ofTP(mg/L) (7) Column (2)*(3)*(6) Transportation impervious 5.57 2.60 24.89'0.19 1.82 Roof impervious 5.57 1.95 2.60 0.11 0.15 Managed pervious 5.57 1.42 9.72 0.28 1.92 Wooded pervious 5.57 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00 Fraction Impervious (1) =0.61 TN Loading (Ib/yr)=37.22 TP Loading (Ib/yr)=3.88 Total Area of Development =3.19 TN Exp.Coeff. (Ib/ac/yr)=11.67 TP Exp.Coeff. (Ib/ac/yr)=1.22 Note: Thenutrientloadinggoalsare4.0 lb/ac/yrforTNand0.4 lb/ac/yrforTP. If the post-development nutrient loadingis belowthese levels,thenno BMPis necessary.Otherwise,thenext worksheet calculates post-developmentTN and TP loadingsafter BMPsare installed. NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION PAYMENT SUMMARY Jurisdiction: Basin: Project Name: Address: Engineer of Record: Date: Rocky Mount Tar/Pamlico NCDOR -Rocky Mount 811 Country Club Road Mark Russell,PE Site Characteristics Acreage Redevelopment Site: BMP(s)Utilized: 3.190 acres (Yes or No) yes NONE Pre-Development Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading Nitrogen Phosphorous 7.785 lb/year lb/year 2.440 0.417 Ib/acre/year Ib/acre/year1.329 Post-Development Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading Nitrogen Phosphorous 37.216 lb/year lb/year 11.667 1.217 Ib/acre/year Ib/acre/year3.883 Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading Limits Nitrogen 5.449 lb/year 1.708 Ib/acre/year Phosphorous 1.329 lb/year 0.417 Ib/acre/year Note: If Redevelopment Site, limits are based on 30% reduction in Nitrogen and pre-development loading for Phosphorous Post-BMP Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading Nitrogen 37.216 Phosphorous 3.883 Unless project is a redevelopment site,post Nitrogen loading is subj or duplex residential and 10 Ibs/acre/year forall other projects lb/year lb/year ?ct to 6 Ibs/ac 11.667 Ib/acre/year Ib/acre/year hold for single-family 1.217 re/year thres Nutrient Buy-Down Summary Nitrogen =31.767 Phosphorous =2.554 lb/year lb/year 9.958 0.801 Ib/acre/year Ib/acre/year NCEEP Offset Payment Schedule Nitrogen =$12.21 per lb. Phosphorous =$349.62 per lb. Buydown Calculations Nitroqen $11,636.26 $26,787.57 = [($ /lb) (# of Ib/yr) (30 yrs) Total Nitrogen Buydown Phosphorous = [($ /lb) (# of Ib/yr) (30 yrs) Total Phosphorus Buydown Total Nutrient Offset Mitigation Payment =$38,423.82 (Note:Mitigation Payment is the sum of the Nitrogen and Phosphorous fees) P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com June 3, 2016 Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate Prepared by MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC Oakwood Properties, LLC Station Square Suite 10 Rocky Mount, NC, 27804 Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184 Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 953.25 (lbs -N) 8 digit-HUC: 03020101 Tar-Pamlico River Basin You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient mitigation requirements for the NCDOR (793 Country Club Road) Project by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. This Bank has received full payment towards the Nitrogen offset requirement for the above referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy rule . The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 953.25 lbs of nitrogen and 76.47 lbs of phosphorous. As no Phosphorus credits are available through the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank at this time, those credits will need to be purchased elsewhere in orde r to fully satisfy your mitigation requirements. You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111. Sincerely, Rich Mogensen, President cc: DWQ -Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator Appendix B Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Information DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 02-26-16 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES George S. Millar, Jr. PO Box 8619 Rocky Mount, NC 27804 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Discharge from broken sewer service at 1265 Independence Drive Dear Mr. Millar: On February 9, 2016, personnel of this office inspected property located at the above address in Rocky Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal discharge from a broken sanitary sewer service located behind the building at 1265 Independence Drive, thereby at a location adjacent to a waterway that enters into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. As such, this letter serves as official notification that you are in violation of Section 10 Article V of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances (Illegal Discharges into the Stormwater System). You are responsible for an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. The violations that were found are:  City Ord. No. 10-215(a) was violated by causing or allowing the discharge, emission, disposal, pouring, or pumping directly or indirectly to any stormwater conveyance, the waters of the state, or upon the land in such proximity to the same (such that the substance is likely to reach a stormwater conveyance or the waters of the state), any fluid, solid, gas, or other substance, other than stormwater.  City Ord. No. 10-215(c) was violated by the storage or disposal of polluting substances, which may be harmful to biological life, in or near the stormwater system or at a location exposed to wind or rain, which could transport the substances to the stormwater system. 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov The following corrective actions are necessary to remedy the violation(s) for which this Notice was sent: • Repair the broken sanitary sewer service line and remove any soil and trash from the adjacent areas that have been affected by this illegal discharge. The corrective actions noted above must be complete within 7 days from receipt of this notice. It is the responsibility of the owner of the property to ensure that corrective measures taken are sufficient to remedy the noted violations prior to the expiration of the compliance period by coordinating with the City of Rocky Mount inspections department and the City Stormwater Engineer. Please be advised that if you fail to respond to this notice or if these violations are not corrected by the end of the compliance period as noted above, the City of Rocky Mount may initiate legal action against you pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216. That action could be the assessment of a civil penalty and the amount may be up to $1,000 per day for each day of each violation. The penalty may be assessed from the date of your receipt of this Notice of Violation. Additionally, pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216(d), criminal charges may be brought by the City which could include additional fines and/or imprisonment of up to thirty (30) days. If these violations are corrected within the time period specified for compliance no further legal action will be pursued. We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances. Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact me at (252) 972-1340. Sincerely, Donald M. Perry, PE, CPESC Stormwater Engineer Department of Public Works & Water Resources cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov ~ . SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2 , arid tt Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delive~s·desired. • Print your name and addr~'On the reverse so that we can return the~card. ti you. • Attach this card to the-back o)tl'i~Ul1ailp[_ece, or on the front if space permits,:· • ~ ~· .~·· 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: 3Jfc;~~ ~ss Mail ~ D Registered Jil Receipt for MerchandlSiD 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D . 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) DYes 2. ' 7008 1140 0004 2624 3987 PS Form 3811 , February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1 02595-02-M-1540 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 11-17-15 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES Crayton Edgecombe Ventures, LLC Attn: Mr. Walt Crayton 2300 Center Avenue Suite 1 New Bern, NC 28562 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Discharge of Stucco/Paint Substance into Storm Drain System at 1129 and 1109-1115 N Fairview Road Dear Mr. Crayton: On November 17, 2015, personnel of this office inspected property located at the above address in Rocky Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal dumping of a stucco/paint type material into the parking lot storm drain inlets, and thereby at a location that would enter into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. As such, this letter serves as official notification that you are in violation of Section 10 Article V of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances (Illegal Discharges into the Stormwater System). You are responsible for an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. The violations that were found are:  City Ord. No. 10-215(a) was violated by causing or allowing the discharge, emission, disposal, pouring, or pumping directly or indirectly to any stormwater conveyance, the waters of the state, or upon the land in such proximity to the same (such that the substance is likely to reach a stormwater conveyance or the waters of the state), any fluid, solid, gas, or other substance, other than stormwater.  City Ord. No. 10-215(c) was violated by the storage or disposal of polluting substances, which may be harmful to biological life, in or near the stormwater system or at a location exposed to wind or rain, which could transport the substances to the stormwater system. 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov The following corrective actions are necessary to remedy the violation(s) for which this Notice was sent: • Remove and properly dispose of all stucco/paint like material and liquid in and around the drainage basins and storm drain pipe network in the parking lot. The corrective actions noted above must be complete within 1 day from receipt of this notice. It is the responsibility of the owner of the property to ensure that corrective measures taken are sufficient to remedy the noted violations prior to the expiration of the compliance period by coordinating with the City Stormwater Engineer. Please be advised that if you fail to respond to this notice or if these violations are not corrected by the end of the compliance period as noted above, the City of Rocky Mount may initiate legal action against you pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216. That action could be the assessment of a civil penalty and the amount may be up to $1,000 per day for each day of each violation. The penalty may be assessed from the date of your receipt of this Notice of Violation. Additionally, pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216(d), criminal charges may be brought by the City which could include additional fines and/or imprisonment of up to thirty (30) days. If these violations are corrected within the time period specified for compliance no further legal action will be pursued. We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances. Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact me at (252) 972-1340. Sincerely, Donald M. Perry, PE, CPESC Stormwater Engineer Department of Public Works & Water Resources Enclosure: On-site photographs cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources Ed White, Streets and Stormwater Superintendent, Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov 1 Donald Perry From:Walt Crayton <wcrayton@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:47 AM To:Carl Smith Cc:Donald Perry Subject:Re: Fairview Rd. Clean-up Email #1 Carl and Donald,    Thank you both for your tremendous response to this situation, again I am deeply sorry that these stucco guys did  this.  Thank you again so very much for everything, and for Carl you and your guys getting out there last night ahead of  these rains.  I truly appreciate it.    Please let me know should either of you need anything further.  Take care.    ‐Walt Crayton      Walt F. Crayton, Jr.  Crayton Commercial, LLC  Shopping Center Development  2300 Center Avenue, Suite One  New Bern, NC 28562  252-637-4000 (office)  252-670-4503 (mobile)  252-637-4043 (fax)  wcrayton@gmail.com  VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.craytoncommercial.com     SPECIALIZING IN RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER DEVELOPMENT,  RE‐DEVELOPMENT, LEASING & MANAGEMENT  THROUGHOUT THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES     “WHEN THE DEAL’S WORTH MAKIN’, STICK WITH CRAYTON!”    2   On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Carl Smith <CSmith@eastern‐environmental.com> wrote:  Good morning Donald,                  Attached is the summary letter and I will be sending pictures in this and additional emails for the clean‐up on  Fairview Rd. rocky Mount.  Call with questions, also I will get with you later to return the pipe plug.     Cordially,     Carl Smith   Carl Smith / CFO  (252)903‐9084 Cell  (252)443‐2224 Office  (252)972‐9940 Fax  P.O. Box 4030   518 S. Pearl St.  Rocky Mount NC, 27803  http://www.spillcontractornc.com/            Whatever It Takes!     This electronic communication (including attachments) contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 252-443-2224 and delete this communication from your system. Thank you.  Eastern Environmental Management, LLC P.O. Box 4030 Rocky Mount, NC 27803 Office (252) 443-2224 (24 Hrs.) Fax (252) 972-9940 www.eastern-environmental.com March 25, 2008 City of Rocky Mount Attn: Mr. Donald Perry 331 South Franklin Street PO Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802-1180 Dear Mr. Perry, Eastern Environmental Management was called out on Tuesday November 17, 2015 by Mr. Walt Crayton. Apparently some contractors doing some stucco repair had improperly clean off their tools into (2) storm drains at 1129 N Fairview Rd, Rocky Mount. EEM responded by vacuuming both storm drains out and then flushing both storm drains with approximately 50 gallons of water per storm drain. EEM also brushed off the tops of each storm grate and lightly brushed the side walls from any residue. EEM brought back approximately 125 gallons of non-haz material for disposal. I have attached some pictures Sincerely, Carl Smith Carl Smith - CEO Partner DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 06-24-16 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES Mr. Clyde Avent 116 Justin Court Rocky Mount, NC 27804 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Car parked on street at 109 Justin Court- leaking oil Dear Mr. Avent: It has come to our attention that there may be a violation of the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Article 5 of the Code of Ordinances) in the street along the curb at 109 Justin Court. On June 01, 2016 personnel of this office inspected a car parked on the street located at the above address. The inspection revealed a recent accumulating oil leak as a result of a car parked on the street for an extended period of time. (reference enclosed report & pictures). This letter is being sent to you in lieu of a formal Notice of Violation due to the fact that the noted violation does not pose an immediate threat to life, property, or the environment. However, the violation must be corrected by July 15, 2016 to avoid issuance of a Notice of Violation. Specifically, the following items must be addressed to the city’s satisfaction prior to the compliance deadline: • As much as possible, remove oil like substance from street surface with absorbent material. Do NOT use any liquid cleaning substance that may enter into the storm drain. • Do not allow any additional oil to leak onto street surface. I encourage you to contact me as soon as possible to discuss the above corrective actions, and again for a follow up inspection prior to the deadline. Should the violations remain on or after the above deadline, a Notice of Violation may be issued, carrying possible civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day per violation from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties. We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances. Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact me at (252) 972-1340. 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov Sincerely, Donald M. Perry, PE Stormwater Engineer Department of Public Works & Water Resources cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources Mike Tolson, PE, Asst. Director & Stormwater Manager, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources Enclosure\ 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov Illicit Discharge Reporting Form Today’s Date: 06/01/2016 Contact Name: Contact Phone Number: Responsible Party: Address: 108 Justin Ct. Rocky Mount, NC. Date of Last Rain Event: 05/30/2016 Estimated amount: .25 inch Date of Next Chance of Rain: 06/02/2016 Has Discharge Entered Storm Drainage System? No Location Of Discharge: 109 Justin Ct. Rocky Mount, NC. Description of Discharge? Color Odor Oily Garbage Oily Where Was Discharge? Open Ditch Stream Other: Asphalt Road Was Discharge Observed? No Was a Photo Taken? Yes (2) Additional Information: Follow Up: Inspector: Thomas Maready UNITED STATE~-j~VICE -NC.275 30JJN ':16 o ... .i.\ .J I II • .'.":Do.Jt\.\d Pe tf '1 ~ E E 1..,\ (,.; ,.\ E'fl.i .,~ J>ef[, City of Rocky Mount PW I WR 331 S. Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27804 First~Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid , USPS Permit No. G-10 •• ' :-11808i) 111111,m •H, 1lm,1 11hi 111 1u11 11JH1 11 11JIiI•11 J JI, ,,1 u, u,. SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Mr. c. \'-\de A./t"T \ \ U, :J usf,· J C Ott;\ fo~~rJC­ ~'7&f 7008 1140 0004 2624 4014 D. Is delivery address different from Item If YES, enter delivery address below: 3:.Pr1M ]Ill& Q>J.~Certm6ci-Fji ~~~""""'-.i.'•Ma~U:...._~~..,,,..,_ o Registered <B{letuffi Receiot tor M~ D Insured Mail D C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1340 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov January 22, 2016 Thompson Nursery, Inc. PO Box 4128 Rocky Mount, NC 27803 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Prohibited lawn maintenance activities at the former Poyner & Spruill, LLP occupied building 130 S Franklin Street Rocky Mount, NC 27803 Dear Sir or Madam: As you may be aware, the City of Rocky Mount is proactive in the enforcement of its Stormwater Management Program. As part of this effort, we have solicited the assistance of City of Rocky Mount employees, contractors, landscapers, and the general public in identifying possible violations of City ordinances dealing with the stormwater system. On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, a City of Rocky Mount employee observed a Thompson Nursery employee disposing/blowing leaves/grass clippings onto the street adjacent to 130 S Franklin Street Bank as part of the lawn maintenance operation. Please be aware that Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances states the following regarding discharges to the stormwater system: a. For first time offenders, if the quantity of the discharge is equal to or less than five (5) gallons and consists of domestic or household products in quantities considered ordinary for household purposes, said person shall be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100.00) per violation or per day for any continuing violation, and if the quantity of the discharge is greater than five (5) gallons or contains non-domestic substances, including but not limited to process waste water, or if said person cannot provide clear and convincing evidence of the volume and nature of the substance discharged, said person shall be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per violation or per day for any continuing violation; b. For repeat offenders, the amount of the penalty shall be double the amount assessed for the previous penalty, not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation or per day for any continuing violation; In the past, Thompson Nursery, Inc. has been found to be in violation of Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances and was notified of the violation (see enclosed); thereby, qualifying as a repeat offender. As a result of the repeat violation, a civil penalty of $50.00 is being accessed for this most recent incident. The assessment amount is based on guidelines in City Ord Sec 10-216. Accordingly, please find attached the invoice for the penalty amount. Per City Ord Section 10-216, once served with this written demand for payment, you have thirty (30) days to pay. After thirty (30) days, a civil action may be filed in the name of the city in the appropriate division of the general court of justice in Nash County in order to recover the civil penalty portion. 331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180 Telephone (252) 972-1121 • Fax (252) 972-1176 • Website: www.ci.rocky-mount.nc.us In the future, to avoid additional enforcement actions, please ensure that any leaves, pine straw, grass clippings and debris are cleaned from the street as soon as possible after maintenance is performed, and are not disposed of in the storm drainage system. I look forward to resolution of this matter and we would appreciate your assistance in ensuring that the City’s drainage ways are kept clear of unnecessary debris. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number below. Sincerely, Donald M. Perry, PE Stormwater Engineer t: 252/972-1340 email: donald.perry@rockymountnc.gov Enclosures: Previous Notice Cc: Enforcement File Jonathan Boone, PE - Director of Public Works & Water Resources Appendix C BMP Retrofit Locations and Information Appendix D Public Education and Outreach Information Activity Point Value #Done Last Yr Points Cost #Planned Next Points Anticipated (10/15 - 9/16)Yr (10/16 - 9/17)Anticipated Cost (Out of Pocket) 1 Demonstration Sites (for BMPs)4 each 2 Local Newspaper Article 2 each 3 Technical Workshop (1st year; 2 required)4 each 4 Environmental Contest / Field Day 4 each 5 Arrange Speakers for Civic Organizations 1 each 21 21 10 10 6 Clean Water Proclamation, with Newspaper Article 2 1 2 7 Web Page / Web Site Links 2 / year 1 2 1 2 8 Pet Waste Ordinance 5 / year 9 Factsheets/Brochures/Flyers/Enviro freebies (public places)2 / year 2 2 100 1 2 500 10 Utility Bill Inserts or Messages on Bills 3 / year 11 Close-out Packages / Info for New Homeowners 3 / year 12 Storm Drain Marking (24 minimum per year)2 / year 25 2 13 Sponsor new/expand Adopt-A-(Street-or-Stream) Program 4 / year 6 4 1 4 14 Recognition Program (environmentally friendly participants)1 / year 15 Toll Free Environmental Hotline (1-800 or Local)3 / year 1 3 1 3 16 VWIN Monitoring Force (Water Quality Reporting)6 / year 17 Other Water Quality Reporting Program 3 / year 18 Major Media Advertising 6 / year 1 6 4310 1 6 4500 19 Local Access or Radio Spots 3 / year 1 3 1500 38 34 Submitted By: Donald M. Perry Title: Date: Assistant City Engineer - Water Resources 8/4/2017 Total Points Reported:Total Points Planned: Please attach copies of articles, flyers, photographs, etc. documenting your activities, labeled for each type of activity. Note: Ongoing activities will continue to receive the education points for each year that they are in effect. Note: If your locality has put together an exceptional effort for any of the above activities, you may be entitled to additional points for that activity. Please attach a description of the activity, a merit rationale, and a point proposal. Appendix S. Public Education Action Report and Plan: Public Education Action Report and Plan Jurisdiction: City of Rocky Mount Date Submitted: Detail of Reported Activities (10/15-09/16) Brief Description of Activity Date Cost Comments/ Presentations:Attachments City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader's Meeting, >20 2/11/2016 Edgecombe County Cpmmissioner's Meeting >25 4/4/2016 Community Watch Group-Nashville, 15 8/11/2016 City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader's Meeting, 15 9/8/2016 Rotary Club Meeting 9/15/2016 Nash Rocky Mount Early College High School Avid Classes, 62 10/22/16, 10/26/15 Benvenue Elementary School, 412 11/03/15, 11/05/15, 11/06/15 G.W. Carver Elementary School, 2 12/17/2015 Free Will Baptist Children's Home, 30 3/31/2016 Benvenue Elementary School Career Day, 725 4/20/2016 Martin Millennium Academy Earth Day, 700 4/22/2016 TSC Summer Enrichment Camp, 35 7/6/2017 Area-L AHEC Camp P.U.S.H., 39 7/20/2016 Participated in 8 Community Events and Festivals, >12000 10/2014-09/2015 Detail of Planned Activities Brief Description of Activity Date Anticipated Comments/ Planned Cost Attachments Adopt-A-Stream Ongoing 2,000.00$ Stormwater Hotline Ongoing -$ Media Advertising & Radio Campaign (CWEP)Ongoing 5,000.00$ Public Presentations Ongoing -$ Storm Drain Marking Ongoing 2,500.00$ Technical Workshop for Staff Summer/Fall 2017 500.00$ Civic Group Civic Group Targeted Audience Civic Group Civic Group Civic Group Civic Groups/General Public All, Publicized with all outreach material Students & Staff Students & Staff Students & Staff Students & Staff Students & Staff Citizens of Rocky Mount; Nash & Edgecombe Counties Schools/Civic Groups/General Public Civic Groups/General Public Operational Supervisors Students & Staff Camp Participants and Staff Camp Participants and Staff General Public Targeted Audience Stormwater Prevention Education From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, Keep America Beautiful Program has made 43 presentations to school groups, neighborhood associations, civic clubs, and public officials. Stormwater prevention literature and incentives (i.e. “Clean Water Begins with You and Me” Brochure, Mutt Mitt, and “No Grease Down the Drain!” Lid) were disseminated and also showcased on the KAB exhibit display at community festivals and events. Specific Keep America Beautiful Program Accomplishments • Collaborative Partnerships: The Keep America Beautiful Program has continued to maintain and build upon the effective collaboration of local government agencies, schools, and businesses as well as faith and grass-root organizations. • Public Education/Outreach: The Keep America Beautiful Program accomplishments for stormwater prevention included: o Participating in 8 community festivals and events (Rocky Mount Fair, Nash County Energy/Safety Expo, International Festival of Cultures, City of Rocky Mount Arbor Day Tree Giveaway, City of Rocky Mount Public Works Week, Cummins Rocky Mount Engine Plant Environmental Day, Rock the Mount, and Villa Place Community Festival, which reached an audience of over 12,000 individuals. o Presentations were done at the following schools and camp programs:  Nash Rocky Mount Early College High School Avid Classes (October 22 and 26, 2015– 60 students and 2 teachers)  Benvenue Elementary School (November 3, 5, and 6, 2015 – 312 students and 10 staff)  G.W. Carver Elementary School (December 17, 2015 – 2 staff)  Free Will Baptist Children’s Home (March 31, 2016 – 20 students and 10 staff)  Benvenue Elementary School Career Day (April 20, 2016 – 700 students and more than 25 staff)  Martin Millennium Academy Earth Day (April 22, 2016 – 650 students and 50 staff)  TSC Summer Enrichment Camp (July 6, 2016 – 35 camp participants and 4 staff)  Area-L AHEC Camp P.U.S.H. (July 20, 2016 – 60 camp participants and 6 staff) o In addition, presentations were made to the following community groups:  City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader’s Meeting (February 11, 2016 – more than 20 community members)  Edgecombe County Commissioners’ Meeting (April 4, 2016 – more than 25 people)  Community Watch Group – Nashville (August 11, 2016 – 15 people)  City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader’s Meeting (September 8, 2016 – 22 community members)  Rotary Club Meeting - Tarboro (September 15, 2016 – more than people) KAB Coordinator distributed stormwater prevention information to over 1,946 students/staff and 107 adults. Fiscal Year 2015 – 2016 Annual Report Mike Schlegel Triangle J Council of Governments 4307 Emperor Boulevard Suite 110 Durham, NC 27703 Phone: (919) 558-9342 Fax: (919) 549-9390 mschlegel@tjcog.org This Annual Report describes Fiscal Year 2015-2016 (FY16) activities of the North Carolina Clean Water Education Partnership (CWEP). Annual Reports, detailed campaign-specific summaries, outreach materials, and other resources are available online at http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 2 - Contents CWEP FY16 Partners and Cost Shares ....................................................................................3 CWEP FY16 Program Overview ..............................................................................................4 CWEP FY16 Summer Cinema Pre-Show Campaign Summary ...............................................5 CWEP FY16 Fall Online Video Pilot Campaign Summary .......................................................7 CWEP FY16 Fall Social Media Campaign Summary ..............................................................10 CWEP FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign Summary .........................................................12 CWEP FY16 Spring Social Media Campaign Summary .........................................................16 CWEP FY16 Website Summary.............................................................................................17 CWEP FY16 Print Outreach ..................................................................................................18 CWEP FY16 Outreach Booth ................................................................................................19 CWEP FY16 Giveaways .........................................................................................................20 A Note about Definitions Media campaigns are described by special statistics and terminology, which may not be familiar to the reader. Definitions are therefore included in this report, which were paraphrased from the following: Surmanek, Jim. Advertising Media A to Z: The Definitive Resource for Media Planning, Buying, and Research. New York, McGraw-Hill. 2003. Webopedia. http://www.webopedia.com. August 10, 2006. Online links to resources for media definitions can also be found on any of CWEP’s Outreach web pages (http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/index.php). A Note about Television Markets and Statistics Media buyers use specialized compilations of market data, called “books,” to target spots to specific demographic populations and generate post-campaign statistics. Vendors of ratings information (usually Nielsen for TV) define a market based on population centers (e.g., the New Bern market). The TV station broadcast areas are usually not coterminous with these market regions. This creates so-called “fringe” markets (usually smaller towns located outside an urban area), whose broadcast stations may be listed in more than one market book. For example, the City of Rocky Mount falls into both the Raleigh-Durham and the New Bern markets. As a result, ratings for Rocky Mount show up in both the Raleigh-Durham and the New Bern books. The values will differ between books; media sales staff typically use the book with the higher ratings for that particular buy. Comparing campaigns over time can be problematic, because different media use different definitions, because the way that a given book defines its market may change, and because the way that campaign statistics are presented by the vendor may vary. Despite these challenges, CWEP’s media buying and campaign analyses continue to become more sophisticated with time. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 3 - CWEP FY16 Partners and Cost Shares CWEP local government partners share the costs of the program. Each of the partners’ shares is the sum of a base cost ($2,000 for FY16) and a proportionate cost. Each partner’s proportionate cost is the product of its population and a per-capita rate ($0.041 per person for FY16; the Steering Committee continued the discount of the per-capita rate applied in FY10 due to the ongoing recession). Partner population estimates are the latest official estimates available from the NC State Demographics unit at the time that cost shares are calculated (FY16 used 2013 certified estimates). Population*Cost Share Population*Cost Share Town of Apex 2,5 40,918 $3,678 Johnston County 1 126,084 $7,169 Town of Benson 2 3,377 $2,138 City of Kinston 1 21,368 $2,876 Town of Butner 2 7,728 $2,317 Town of Knightdale 2 12,692 $2,520 Town of Carrboro 2,5 20,510 $2,841 Town of Morrisville 2,5 20,753 $2,851 Town of Cary 1,2,5 144,671 $7,932 Nash County 2,4 40,920 $3,678 Town of Chapel Hill*,2,5 51,153 $4,097 City of New Bern 1 29,889 $3,225 Chatham County 2,5 52,965 $4,172 Orange County 1,2,5 54,445 $4,232 Town of Clayton 2 17,174 $2,704 City of Oxford 4 8,489 $2,348 City of Creedmoor 2 4,289 $2,176 Town of Pittsboro 5 4,133 $2,169 City of Durham 1,3,5 241,174 $11,888 City of Raleigh 1,3 416,221 $19,065 Durham County 1,5 40,385 $3,656 City of Rocky Mount 2,4 56,334 $4,310 Town of Fuquay-Varina 2 19,802 $2,812 City of Roxboro 2 8,187 $2,336 Town of Garner 1,2 27,035 $3,108 Town of Smithfield 1 11,027 $2,452 City of Goldsboro 1,2 35,489 $3,455 Town of Spring Lake*,2 7,111 $2,292 City of Havelock 1 20,821 $2,854 Town of Tarboro 4 11,285 $2,463 Town of Hillsborough 2 6,395 $2,262 Town of Wake Forest 2 32,360 $3,327 Town of Holly Springs 2 27,637 $3,133 Wayne County 1,2 81,855 $5,356 Town of Hope Mills 2 15,915 $2,653 Town of Wendell 2 6,146 $2,252 Town of Zebulon 2 4,541 $2,186 1. Subject to Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Regulations. 2. Subject to NPDES Phase II Stormwater Regulations. 3. Subject to NPDES Phase I Stormwater Regulations. 4. Subject to Tar-Pamlico River Basin Nutrient Management Regulations. 5. Subject to Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Regulations. *Populations have been adjusted for group quarters covered by another state stormwater permit CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 4 - CWEP FY16 Program Overview The CWEP Steering Committee (consisting representatives from each local government partner) established CWEP FY16 program cost shares and budget in January 2015. FY16 was an exciting year for CWEP, as the program began a move into digital -first outreach markets with a primary focus on online video and social media campaigns. There is a monumental shift underway in how people access and consume media. Whereas traditional broadcast and cable television has been the mainstay for many years, more and more people are using mobile devices and streaming platforms to access programming. On the Internet, video content is increasingly popular for accessing targeted video clips. Traditional, full-length television programs are still very popular, but more people are accessing them through non-traditional means. As such, in FY16, CWEP focused on online video pre-roll advertising, mobile television platforms and social media campaigns. Developing jurisdictional statistics from digital platforms has presented a new challenge this year because we now have more precise and accurate information abo ut actual impressions (rather than broad estimates based on limited television samples), but we’ve had to develop new methods for assigning impressions to the jurisdictional-level. CWEP continued working with Greenroom Communications and developed a new 30- second stand-alone version of our Sodfather grass clippings spot as well as hosted an online lawn-care giveaway campaign on the CWEP Facebook page. CWEP also hosted a website providing information to the public on stormwater issues and provided a booth for CWEP partners to take to local events to educate the public face-to-face. These activities are described in greater detail in the remainder of this report . CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 5 - CWEP FY16 Summer Cinema Pre-Show Campaign Summary Introduction CWEP ran DENR’s Johnny Fishpatrick spot in CWEP area movie theaters in Summer 2015. Two cinema networks or “circuits,” National CineMedia and Screenvision, were purchased to maximize coverage of CWEP Partner jurisdictional areas. This arrangement with two vendors began in FY13 and improves coverage of our member jurisdictions with cinema outreach. Spot The 30-second Johnny Fishpatrick spot from the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources was run in all theaters. This spot conveys general messages about sources of stormwater pollution and the public’s role in preventing it in a family -friendly way. Target Audience Movie theaters are bought in batches; spots and campaigns cannot be targeted to individual movies or demographics. Campaign Locations and Performance Spots were shown in numerous movie theaters in the CWEP partner area on two circuits, National CineMedia and Screenvision. Below is a list of each circuit’s theaters and their locations. Both circuits ran the spot 7/31/2015 - 8/13/2015. Cinema flights usually start on Fridays and end on Thursdays. An error was made in the initial booking and Kinston’s cinema was inadvertently omitted from the NCM run. NCM ran a series of makegoods 9/4/2015 - 9/17/2015, which included additional cinemas and are reported separately below. Please report the statistics for the theater(s) closest to or within your jurisdiction. Impressions represent how many times the spot was viewed. The impression count is based on total views and may include some duplicated audience members if moviegoers attended more than one movie during the campaign. Impressions were estimated by the vendor based on the number of weeks the spot ran in the theater and an estimated average number of viewers per screen per week for the time of year or based on the previous year’s ticket sales. National CineMedia ran our ads in their lobbies as well, so we assumed that each person saw the spot once in their theaters’ lobbies and once in the theaters. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 6 - National CineMedia Circuit – Primary Run Theatre Location # of Big Screens # of Spots Est. Big Screen Impressions Est. Lobby Impressions Est. Total Impressions Beaver Creek Stadium 12 Apex 12 672 10,135 3,686 13,821 Brier Creek Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 9,490 3,451 12,941 Crossroads Stadium 20 Cary 20 1,120 16,667 6,061 22,728 North Hills Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 13,581 4,938 18,519 Premiere Theatre 12 Goldsboro 12 672 7,267 2,642 9,909 Premiere Theatre 14 Rocky Mount 14 784 6,681 2,429 9,110 Wakefield 12 Raleigh 12 672 13,295 4,835 18,130 White Oak Stadium 14 Garner 14 784 13,143 4,779 17,922 Timberlyne 6 Chapel Hill 6 336 3,513 n/a 3,513 Totals 6,608 93,772 32,821 126,593 National CineMedia Circuit – Makegood Run Theatre Location # of Big Screens # of Spots Est. Big Screen Impressions Est. Lobby Impressions Est. Total Impressions Brier Creek Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 3,947 1,435 5,382 North Hills Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 5,649 2,054 7,703 Premiere Theatre 7 Kinston Kinston 7 392 824 300 1,124 Totals 1,960 10,420 3,789 14,209 ScreenVision Circuit Theatre Location # of Screens # of Spots Estimated Impressions Lumina Theatre Chapel Hill 5 350 6,540 Phoenix 10 on the Plaza Durham 10 700 14,005 Southpoint Cinemas Durham 17 1,190 26,630 Millstone 14 Fayetteville 14 980 22,860 Marketfair 15 Fayetteville 15 1,050 23,970 Havelock Cinema I-VI Havelock 6 420 6,900 Stone Theaters Park West 14 Morrisville 14 980 24,650 Carmike Raleigh 15 Raleigh 15 1050 20,780 Carmike Wilson 10 Wilson 10 700 14,020 Totals 7,420 160,355 Campaign Costs and Overall Performance Total cost: $11,000 Total spots: 15,988 Total impressions: 301,157 Average per-spot cost: $0. 688 Average per-impression cost: $0.0365 CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 7 - CWEP FY16 Fall Online Video Pilot Campaign Summary Introduction CWEP ran an online video pre-roll campaign in Fall 2015 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015- 2016 stormwater public outreach program. Video pre-roll is an advertising spot that is shown before an online video clip. A total of $8,090.00 was spent by the Partnership on the Fall 2015 video online pre-roll pilot campaign. Spots One 15-second video pre-roll spot (advertisement) ran, CWEP’s 2015 “Sodfather” teaser spot. The short 15-second teaser spot and an accompanying banner ad were intended to entice viewers to click through to watch the full 2-minute version of the Sodfather video and participate in the Sodfather Challenge by pledging to follow the Sodfather’s advice to “mow high and let it lie.” The full video and Sodfather pledge were hosted on CWEP’s Facebook page. Campaign The spot ran across Time Warner Cable’s Online Audience Network in the Raleigh, Greenville and Wilmington markets to the zip codes within CWEP Partner jurisdictions. It was run as both a run-of-network spot and targeted spot from September 17 to September 29, 2015. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 8 - The campaign targeted sites and programs related to home and yard care, e.g., Southern Living, as well as general family entertainment. Target Audience The audience targeted for this campaign was adults aged 35+ who own their own homes, are educated and enjoy yard work and gardening. Research shows that this is the demographic most likely to do their own yard care (rather than hiring a service) and because our Sodfather spot was designed to communicate grass clipping care concepts to this demographic. Campaign Performance Campaign performance statistics are reported here for the media market’s population as a whole, not for the target demographic. This is important to note because campaigns are targeted to reach a particular demographic, which is a smaller base, so the statistics describing campaign efficiency are generally higher and gross impression count is lower for the target audience than for the population as a whole. For local government and/or regulatory reporting purposes, figures on the population as a whole are more readily understood and compared. The Fall 2015 online video pre-roll pilot campaign had 347,105 total video plays with a 76.95% completion rate. Because the spot was delivered online, these are verified actual video plays rather than estimates generated from a small sample as is the case with traditional television statistics. The jurisdictional values presented below are estimates that were derived by dividing the entire campaign impressions by the proportion of the target population within each jurisdiction. That is to say, the spot was designed t o be delivered proportionally across the CWEP Partner jurisdictions. Definitions Impressions: How many times the video spot was actually played in the market by members of the population. (Spots may have been seen more than once by the same person; the impression count is based on total actual views regardless of duplication among members of the audience.) Note that the population counts used by media outlets differ from those used by CWEP, so actual impression counts may differ somewhat from those shown for jurisdictions to report on the following page. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 9 - Estimated Figures by Jurisdiction for CWEP Partners to Report JURISDICTION FY16 POPULATION IMPRESSIONS Town of Apex 40,918 8,842 Town of Benson 3,377 730 Town of Butner 7,728 1,670 Town of Carrboro 20,510 4,432 Town of Cary 144,671 31,261 Town of Chapel Hill 51,153 11,053 Chatham County 52,965 11,445 Town of Clayton 17,174 3,711 City of Creedmoor 4,289 927 City of Durham 241,174 52,114 Durham County 40,385 8,727 Town of Fuquay-Varina 19,802 4,279 Town of Garner 27,035 5,842 City of Goldsboro 35,489 7,669 City of Havelock 20,821 4,499 Town of Hillsborough 6,395 1,382 Town of Holly Springs 27,637 5,972 Town of Hope Mills 15,915 3,439 Johnston County 126,084 27,245 City of Kinston 21,368 4,617 Town of Knightdale 12,692 2,743 Town of Morrisville 20,753 4,484 Nash County 40,920 8,842 City of New Bern 29,889 6,459 Orange County 54,445 11,765 City of Oxford 8,489 1,834 Town of Pittsboro 4,133 893 City of Raleigh 416,221 89,940 City of Rocky Mount 56,334 12,173 City of Roxboro 8,187 1,769 Town of Smithfield 11,027 2,383 Town of Spring Lake 7,111 1,537 Town of Tarboro 11,285 2,439 Town of Wake Forest 32,360 6,993 Wayne County 81,855 17,688 Town of Wendell 6,146 1,328 Town of Zebulon 4,541 981 CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 10 - CWEP FY16 Fall Social Media Campaign Summary Introduction CWEP embarked on another program first in FY16 with an online social media campaign in Fall 2015. Working with Greenroom Communication, the full-length Sodfather video spot was posted on CWEP’s Facebook page along with a Sodfather Challenge to pledge to follow the Sodfather’s advice to “mow high and let it lie.” Spot The full-length CWEP Sodfather spot was used in the posts as well as behind the scenes photos. This Sodfather spot is a humorous portrayal of a neighbor that takes himself too seriously ‘The Sodfather’ as he conveys proper ways to manage and dispose of grass clippings to his neighbors. It is a light-hearted, family-friendly spot with a fun twist at the end. It was designed to be “sharable” through online social media platforms. Target Audience The series of Facebook posts were boosted through a modest advertising buy to NC viewers ages 25-45. Campaign Performance The posts and social media sharing generated over 61,000 online impressions, and the video had over 12,000 views on Facebook between August 20 and October 3, 2015. In addition, there was a high level of Facebook post engagement with 505 post clicks, 223 likes, 19 comments and 72 shares, which is outstanding! CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 11 - The Sodfather Pledge page had 231 visitors and 60 people completed the poll. The CWEP Partners assisted in the performance for the video and the pledge by posting on their social channels and websites. There were social media posts and shares from the Town of Morrisville, Holly Springs, Durham NC Stormwater, and Raleigh Go Green. There were also blog posts and web updates from Orange County, Knightdale, Chapel Hill, Morrisville, Hillsborough, and Butner. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 12 - CWEP FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign Summary Introduction Building on the success of the online video pre-roll campaign in the Fall, CWEP conducted an expanded online media campaign for Spring 2016 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015-2016 stormwater public outreach program. This campaign had three separate components and featured a new 30-second version of the Sodfather spot based on Partner feedback. The spring online campaign included video pre-roll across the Time Warner Cable (TWC) Online Audience Network, 30-second traditional television commercials delivered through TWC’s TV Anywhere internet-based platforms, and several days of full-screen, high-impact advertising on TWC’s webmail login pages. A total of $25,200.00 was spent by the Partnership on the Spring 2016 online video campaign. Spots In the Fall 2015 campaign, CWEP featured a 15-second video “teaser” spot intended to entice viewers to click through to watch the full 2-minute version of the Sodfather video. Feedback from the Partners was that this 15-second spot did not deliver a succinct message in and of itself, which makes sense since it was not designed as a stand along advertisement. Therefore, the Partners worked with Greenroom to develop a new 30 - second version of the Sodfather video that could be used as a stand -alone advertisement and deliver a complete message about grass clippings. The 30-second spot is more versatile, since it can be used as a preview to the full-length 2-minute version or used in additional venues like movie theaters or traditional television advertising a s a stand-alone spot. The new 30-second Sodfather spot was featured in the Spring 2016 online video campaign. Campaign Audience Network Pre-Roll: The 30-second spot ran as a video pre-roll advertisement across Time Warner Cable’s Online Audience Network in the Raleigh, Greenville and Wilmington markets to the zip codes within CWEP Partner jurisdictions. Video pre-roll is an advertising spot that is shown before an online video clip and was accompanied by a static banner advertisement on the page. It was run as both a run-of-network spot and targeted spot from March 21 to June 12, 2016. Like the Fall 2015 pilot, the pre-roll campaign targeted sites and programs related to home and yard care, e.g., Southern Living, as well as general family entertainment. TV Everywhere: The 30-second Sodfather spot was also used as a stand-alone television commercial on TWC’s TV Everywhere platform. This new platform is an internet -based app for mobile phones, tablets and streaming devices. It allows TWC customers to view regular television program on demand and on-the-go across a wide variety of mobile devices and set-top streaming boxes. The programing and commercial are traditional, but the delivery methods are a new technology-based platform. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 13 - Webmail Take-Over: The third component of the Spring 2016 online video campaign was a full-page advertisement on TWC’s webmail login page for a 24-hour period, referred to as a webmail take-over. We ran the webmail take-over several times in the Raleigh and Wilmington markets during the campaign. Target Audience The audience targeted for this campaign was adults aged 35+ who own their own homes, are educated and enjoy yard work and gardening. Research shows that this is the demographic most likely to do their own yard care (rather than hiring a service) and because our Sodfather spot was designed to communicate grass clipping care concepts to this demographic. Campaign Performance Campaign performance statistics are reported here for the media market’s population as a whole across all three campaign components, not for the target demographic. This is important to note because campaigns are targeted to reach a particular demographic, which is a smaller base, so the statistics describing campaign efficiency are generally higher and gross impression count is lower for the target audience than for the population as a whole. For local government and/or regulatory reporting purposes, figures on the population as a whole are more readily understood and compared . More detailed campaign statistics are available upon request. The Spring 2016 online video campaign had 898,573 total impressions and engagement of 3,260 click-throughs. Because the spot was delivered online, these are verified actual video plays rather than estimates generated from a small sample as is the case with traditional television statistics. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 14 - The jurisdictional values presented below are estimates that were derived by dividing the entire campaign impressions by the proportion of the target population within each jurisdiction, because the campaign was designed to be delivered proportionally across the CWEP Partner jurisdictions. Definitions Impressions: How many times the advertisement or video spot was actually viewed in the market by members of the population. (Spots may have been seen more than once by the same person; the impression count is based on total actual views regardless of duplication among members of the audience.) Note that the population counts used by media outlets differ from those used by CWEP, so actual impression counts may differ somewhat from those shown for jurisdictions to report on the following page. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 15 - Estimated Figures by Jurisdiction for CWEP Partners to Report JURISDICTION FY16 POPULATION IMPRESSIONS Town of Apex 40,918 21,237 Town of Benson 3,377 1,753 Town of Butner 7,728 4,011 Town of Carrboro 20,510 10,645 Town of Cary 144,671 75,088 Town of Chapel Hill 51,153 26,550 Chatham County 52,965 27,490 Town of Clayton 17,174 8,914 City of Creedmoor 4,289 2,226 City of Durham 241,174 125,175 Durham County 40,385 20,961 Town of Fuquay-Varina 19,802 10,278 Town of Garner 27,035 14,032 City of Goldsboro 35,489 18,420 City of Havelock 20,821 10,807 Town of Hillsborough 6,395 3,319 Town of Holly Springs 27,637 14,344 Town of Hope Mills 15,915 8,260 Johnston County 126,084 65,440 City of Kinston 21,368 11,090 Town of Knightdale 12,692 6,587 Town of Morrisville 20,753 10,771 Nash County 40,920 21,238 City of New Bern 29,889 15,513 Orange County 54,445 28,258 City of Oxford 8,489 4,406 Town of Pittsboro 4,133 2,145 City of Raleigh 416,221 216,028 City of Rocky Mount 56,334 29,239 City of Roxboro 8,187 4,249 Town of Smithfield 11,027 5,723 Town of Spring Lake 7,111 3,691 Town of Tarboro 11,285 5,857 Town of Wake Forest 32,360 16,796 Wayne County 81,855 42,485 Town of Wendell 6,146 3,190 Town of Zebulon 4,541 2,357 CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 16 - CWEP FY16 Spring Social Media Campaign Summary Introduction Working with Greenroom Communication, CWEP conducted another social media campaign during Spring 2016, this time featuring the new 30-second Sodfather spot. The campaign included a new Sodfather Pledge and a chance to win free lawn care services from Pleasant Green Grass. Spot The Spring 2016 social media campaign included Facebook posts with the 30-second Sodfather spot along with few innovative posts like carousel ads and Sodfather tips as animated GIFs. The posts were coupled with the Facebook-based Sodfather Pledge. Target Audience The Spring 2016 social media campaign was targeted to a smaller geographic area to stay within the service area of Pleasant Green Grass, since we were offering free lawn care service to one winner from the Sodfather Pledge. The Facebook posts were also targets to viewers ages 25-45. Campaign Performance The posts and social media sharing generated over 20,030 online impressions, and 530 click-throughs to the Sodfather Pledge page. Because of the tighter targeting, the 30 - second video had fewer overall views than the Fall campaign, but a higher rate of video completions. There were 1,931 video views, a 47% completion rate, and a high level of Facebook post engagement with 266 post clicks, 192 reactions, 31 comments, 136 link clicks and 59 post shares. The Sodfather Pledge page had 530 visitors, and 21 people completed the poll. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 17 - CWEP FY16 Website Summary http://www.NC clean water.org CWEP’s website is hosted and maintained by Design Hammer, LLC, an independent and locally owned web service provider that also handled our website redesign in FY2005- FY2006. The web language coding protocol is PHP. CWEP currently owns three domains: nccwep.org (our original domain), nccleanwater.com, and NC clean water.org (preferred). The home page is updated periodically to align with the outreach campaigns. Concurrent with most of our media campaigns, we often post a poll on our home page asking visitors what brings them to our site (the media campaign, a search engine, a bookmark, etc.). CWEP tracks several web metrics to evaluate traffic on our website (i.e., on-site web analytics). Design Hammer uses a program called NetTracker to measure these web analytics. The figures below represent traffic on all three domains in total. Wikipedia has a good explanation of web analytics terms used below. (Due to calculation methodologies, metrics that may seem like they should sum may not.) Month Unique visitors Number of visits Visits per visitor Pages Pages per visit Hits Bandwidth (MB) Av Visit Duration (seconds) Jul-15 1,537 2,361 1.54 4,682 1.98 58,798 623.56 114 Aug-15 1,896 2,831 1.49 6,630 2.34 39,261 982.93 140 Sep-15 2,682 3,924 1.46 10,159 2.17 69,586 1035.00 258 Oct-15 2,653 4,077 1.54 8,858 2.17 65,772 911.14 266 Nov-15 2,055 3,248 1.58 9,225 2.84 51,316 909.67 142 Dec-15 1,790 2,987 1.67 7,411 2.48 34,203 1024.00 115 Jan-16 1,923 3,055 1.59 8,111 2.65 37,419 1718.00 156 Feb-16 1,642 2,435 1.48 5,596 2.30 32,308 883.00 120 Mar-16 1,898 2,603 1.37 5,892 2.26 35,385 561.00 207 Apr-16 2,763 3,578 1.29 6,799 1.90 48,619 758.00 161 May-16 2,423 3,295 1.36 7,686 2.33 47,401 672.57 158 Jun-16 1,562 2,347 1.50 5,373 2.29 30,811 730.34 147 All Year: 24824 36,741 N/A 86,422 N/A 550,879 10809.21 N/A CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 18 - CWEP FY16 Print Outreach All print materials described below are available online at http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/print.php. CWEP Topical Brochures In FY2012, CWEP produced five topical brochures for Partners to use in their public education efforts. The topics correspond to the topics on our Booth (household hazardous waste/oil recycling, yard care, pet waste, and litter) as well as an additional brochure on riparian buffers. In FY2013, these brochures were translated to Spanish. CWEP General Stormwater Brochure The CWEP general stormwater brochure was reprinted in FY15. Copies are available for Partners to distribute. In addition, an electron ic copy is available in PDF format on the CWEP website under “Outreach” and then under “Print.” CWEP Slicks CWEP provides “slicks” (see right), pre-made newspaper advertisements that promote our website and remind citizens that what they put on their yards ends up in our waterways. Slicks are generally run simply as filler when a newspaper has a little extra space. Any CWEP Partner is welcome to submit slicks to their local news outlets. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 19 - CWEP FY16 Outreach Booth CWEP has two outreach booths (with accessories) for Partners to check out for local events consisting of:  Enviroscape Watershed Model showing how stormwater gets polluted (available only at RTP location)  Model, accessories (trees, houses, cars), and supplies for “pollution” and rain”  Table to put Enviroscape on  Display (available at both RTP and Coastal locations)  Pop-up display with blue back pieces to attach topical panels to  5 topical panels (English and Spanish) for each of the five topics (two topics can be attached at any given time): Litter, Hazardous Household Waste, Pet Waste, Yard Care, and Riparian Buffers  Display banner reading “Clean water begins with you and me”  Table to put display and outreach materials on For indoor booth use, CWEP also has (RTP location only):  Light hardware to backlight display banner  Extra bulbs for banner backlights  Grounded extension cord for banner lighting  Tablecloth with CWEP logo and tagline For outdoor booth use, CWEP also has (RTP location only):  10’ x 10’ tent  Tent leg extenders  Tent walls in case of rain  Bucket of sand and string to attach and weigh down tent and/or display To reserve the booth, the Enviroscape, or any of these outreach supplies, visit http://www.supersaas.com/schedule/C WEP_Booth/CWEP_Partner_Resources. Please contact Mike Schlegel at mschlegel@tjcog.org or 919-558-9342 for support on the booth/Enviroscape or to order giveaways for local distribution. CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 20 - CWEP FY16 Giveaways CWEP maintains access to topical giveaways that can be ordered by Partners or by CWEP on behalf of Partners for local distribution. These materials can be displayed and distributed along with the corresponding booth panels on that topic, or they can be used separately. A description of available giveaways and their cost is provided at http://nccleanwater.wordpress.com/giveaways  Plant Pride Not Litter stickers and tattoos (Litter topic)  Soil test kits (Yard Care topic)  Mutt Mitts (Pet Waste topic)  Grease Can Lids in English and Spanish (Hazardous Household Waste topic)  Used oil disposal magnets in English and Spanish (Hazardous Household Waste topic)  Pencils, “Clean Water Begins with You and Me” (General) Fat Trapper Bags are no longer available, so a different giveaway was made in FY13. Grease can lids in both English and Spanish are now available. PLEASE NOTE: Giveaways can be ordered and directly billed to CWEP Partners or ordered and delivered to TJCOG for pickup. If ordering for delivery to your Partner location, please ensure that billing is also directed to your local Partner address. Billing cannot run through CWEP/TJCOG unless the giveaways are delivered to TJCOG and then picked up by the Partner. Please contact Mike Schlegel at mschlegel@tjcog.org or 919-558-9342 for support on the booth/Enviroscape or to order giveaways for local distribution. CMYK10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 901X, , 2001newsobserver.com/nie City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Management Contact Information Blair Hinkle 252-972-1294 Assistant Public Works Director / Stormwater Manager Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Stormwater Engineer Ed White 252-467-4907 Streets/Stormwater Superintendent Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Technician (For Stormwater Billing Questions) Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 To Report Drainage Problems or Concerns To Report Illegal Dumping 252-972-1500 City of Rocky Mount Department of Public Works Stormwater Management Program 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html ONLY RAIN DOWN THE STORM DRAIN!!! Stormwater Runoff Pollution Prevention & Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program FOR LAWN AND GARDEN MAINTENANCE City of Rocky Mount Public Works Department Stormwater Management http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Stormwater and Runoff Pollution http://www.ncstormwater.org/ Clean Water Education Partnership http://www.nccwep.org/ Center for Watershed Protection http://www.cwp.org/ OTHER RESOURCES THE ISSUES THE SOLUTION ‘WHAT YOU CAN DO’ The Tar River and its tributaries are an important natural resource to the residents of the City of Rocky Mount and the State of North Carolina. Stormwater is discharged into the Tar River and its tributaries without filtration or treatment, leading to a reduction in water quality. The most common sources of stormwater pollution are yard waste, eroded soils, trash, household hazardous chemicals, pet waste, and automotive waste. Pollutants in storm drains and ditches prevent proper drainage and degrade water quality in the Tar River, Stoney Creek, and other area lakes and streams. Public education and community involvement to control these pollutants are an essential component of the City’s Stormwater Management Program. The community’s health, safety, and ability to enjoy the Tar River greatly depend on our efforts as a community to reduce stormwater pollution. THE CONSEQUENCES Keep debris out of storm drains and ditches. Don’t blow trash, leaves, grass clippings, or mulch into storm drains, streets, curbs, or waterways. Don’t scalp vegetation on ditch banks. Vegetation prevents erosion and helps filter stormwater flowing into ditches and streams. Bag it up! Put grass clippings, leaves, and other yard waste in bags to be hauled to your nearest refuse facility. Limit the use of chemicals which may be washed into the storm drains. This includes but is not limited to fertilizers, pesticides, and car wash solutions. Clean up spills immediately and properly. Dispose of spilled material appropriately, never in the stormwater system. Wash your equipment in the grass. You can limit run off if you utilize a bucket, sponge, and a hose with a nozzle. The soil serves as a natural filter to chemicals. Be proactive. Check drains and ditches in your area and report issues before they become drainage problems. Spread the word! Do your part to protect our rivers and streams. Not knowing the proper way to handle waste products could lead to pollution and possibly a citation for illegal dumping. Violation of the City of Rocky Mount’s Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Articale5 of the Code of Ordinances) could carry civil penalties of up to $1,000 PER DAY PER VIOLATION from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties. In addition to possible penalties, our water supply may be compromised which could pose problems for ALL city residents and businesses. The City of Rocky Mount appreciates your assistance with this important matter. Working together, we can ensure the health of the Tar River for generations to come. La Ciudad de Rocky Mount Manejo del Aguas Suminstro Información de Contacto Blair Hinkle 252-972-1294 Asistente de Director de Obras Públicas / Aguas Pluviales Gerente Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Ingeniero de Aguas Pluviales Ed White 252-467-4907 Calles / Aguas Pluviales Superintendente Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Técnico (Para preguntas sobre facturación de Aguas Pluviales) Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 Para Informar de Problemas de Drenaje o Preocupaciones PARA REPORTAR DESECHO ILEGAL 252-972-1500 La Ciudad de Rocky Mount DEPARTAMENTO DE OBRAS PÚBLICAS PROGRAMA DE MANEJO DEL AGUAS SUMINISTRO 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html SÓLO LA LLUVIA ABAJO DEL DREN DE LA TORMENTA !!! LA ABUNDANCIA DE LLUVIA ESCORRENTÍA Y LA PREVENCIÓN DE CONTAMINACIÓN PROGRAMA DE DETECCIÓN DE LAS DESCARGAS ILÍCITAS Y ELIMINACIÓN (IDDE) MANTENIMIENTO DE CESPED Y JARDÍN Ciudad de Rocky Mount Departamento de Obras Públicas Manejo de Aguas Pluviales http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html Departamento de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales de Caro-lina del Norte La Abundancia de Lluvia Caida y la Contaminación http://www.ncstormwater.org/ Agua Limpio Sociedad de Educación http://www.nccwep.org/ Centro para la Protección de Zanjas http://www.cwp.org/ OTHER RESOURCES LA INFORMACION LA SOLUCIÓN Y LO QUE CADA UNO PUEDE HACER El río Tar y sus afluentes son un recurso natural importante para los residentes de la Ciudad de Rocky Mount y el Estado de Carolina del Norte. Las aguas pluviales se vierten en el río Tar y sus afluentes sin filtración o tratamiento, lo que lleva a una reducción en la calidad del agua. Las fuentes más comunes de contaminación de las aguas pluviales son desechos de jardín, suelos erosionados, basura, productos químicos domésticos peligrosos, desechos de mascotas, y residuos de automoción. Los contaminantes en las alcantarillas y zanjas impiden el drenaje adecuado y degradan la calidad del agua en el río Tar, Stoney Creek, y otros lagos y arroyos de la zona. La educación pública y la participación comunitaria para el control de estos contaminantes son un componente esencial de las aguas pluviales de la Ciudad Programa de Gestión. La salud de la comunidad, la seguridad, y la capacidad para disfrutar del río Tar dependen en gran medida de nuestros esfuerzos como una comunidad para reducir la contaminación de las aguas pluviales. LA CONSEQUENCIAS Mantener los residuos fuera de las alcantarillas y zanjas. No sople la basura, hojas, recortes de césped, o mantillo en los desagües pluviales, calles, aceras o vías de agua. No escalpar vegetación en los bancos de la zanja. La vegetación evita la erosión y ayuda a las aguas pluviales del filtro fluye en zanjas y arroyos. Bolsa para arriba! Ponga los recortes de hierba, hojas y otros desechos de jardín en bolsas para ser remolcado a su centro de basura más cercano. Limite el uso de productos químicos que pueden ser lavados en las bocas de tormenta. Esto incluye pero no se limita a los fertilizantes, pesticidas, y soluciones de lavado de coches. Limpie los derrames de inmediato y adecuadamente. Eliminar el material derramado apropiadamente , nunca en el sistema de aguas pluviales. Lave su equipo en la hierba. Puede limitar corra si usted utiliza un cubo, esponja, y una manguera con una boquilla. El suelo actúa como un filtro natural a los productos químicos. Sea proactivo. Verifique los desagües y zanjas en su área e informar los problemas antes de que se conviertan en problemas de drenaje. Corre la voz! Haga su parte para proteger nuestros ríos y arroyos. Sin saber la forma correcta de manejar los pro-ductos de desecho podría dar lugar a la contaminación y, posiblemente, una citación por vertidos ilegales. Violación de la ciudad de Aguas Pluviales de descarga Ilícito de Rocky Mount y la Ordenanza del dumping o Ilegal (Sección 10 Articale5 del Código de Ordenanzas) podría llevar a multas de hasta $ 1,000 por día por VIOLACIÓn desde la fecha de emisión, así como las posibles sanciones penales. Además de las posibles sanciones, nuestro suministro de agua puede estar en peligro, que podría plantear problemas para TODOS los residentes de la ciudad y las empresas. La ciudad de Rocky Mount agradece su ayuda con este importante asunto. Trabajando juntos, podemos asegurar la salud del río Tar para las generaciones venideras. City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Management Contact Information Blair Hinkle 252-972-1520 Assistant Public Works Director / Stormwater Mgr. Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Technician (For Stormwater Billing Questions) Ed White 252-467-4907 Streets/Stormwater Superintendent Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Stormwater Engineer Andy Hicks 252-972-1571 Regulatory Compliance Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 To Report Drainage Problems or Concerns To Report Illegal Dumping 252-972-1500 City of Rocky Mount Department of Public Works Stormwater Management Program 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html ONLY RAIN DOWN THE STORM DRAIN!!! Stormwater Runoff Pollution Prevention & Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program FOR THE FOOD SERVICE INDUSTRY EPA Stormwater Management Best Practices http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/stormwater/best_practices.htm NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources: Division of Water Quality Stormwater BMP http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual City of Rocky Mount Public Works Department Stormwater Management http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html Fats, Oils, and Grease BMP Manual http://www.rockymountnc.gov/utilities/documents/FOGHandbook.pdf OTHER RESOURCES THE ISSUES THE SOLUTION ‘WHAT YOU CAN DO’ There are various waste sources associated with the food service industry which can lead to stormwater contamination if not handled properly. Some examples of these sources are as follows: Waste Containers Trash Fats, Oils, & Grease Cleaning/Wash Water Landscaping Spills Knowing how to properly contain these po-tential sources of pollution not only saves our water supply, but it improves the appearance of our city as well. Together we can do our part to ensure that we maintain a safe water supply now and for our future generations. THE CONSEQUENCES Waste containers should be sealed against leaks, have a lid that closes properly, and should not be used to dispose of any liquid material . Trash should be swept up and disposed of often, never into a storm drain Fat, Oils, & Grease should never be poured down any drain, stormwater or sewer. All cleaning and cleaning materials should be handled over a sink or in a wash bay area. DO NOT CLEAN equipment outdoors in an area where water can flow to the gutter, storm drain, or street. Never pour wash water down a storm drain, this includes mop buckets. Pesticides and other chemicals should be used sparingly in landscaping. There should be a spill containment kit on hand to handle any accidental spills. Employee training on these issues is a must. Each employee should be made aware of the hazards and consequences for violating the Illicit Discharge ordinance. Not knowing the proper way to handle waste products could lead to pollution and possibly a citation for illegal dumping. Violation of the City of Rocky Mount’s Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Articale5 of the Code of Ordinances) could carry civil penalties of up to $1,000 PER DAY PER VIOLATION from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties. In addition to possible penalties, our water supply may be compromised which could pose problems for ALL city residents and businesses. The City of Rocky Mount appreciates your assistance with this important matter. Working together, we can ensure the health of the Tar River for generations to come.