HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000442_2016 Tar-Pam Report Final_20181105
Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rule
Annual Report
August 2017
Donald M. Perry
Assistant City Engineer – Water Resources
City of Rocky Mount
Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report
City of Rocky Mount
1
I. Introduction
The purpose of this report is to satisfy the annual reporting requirements set forth in the Tar-
Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0258). Pursuant to these
requirements, this report contains information on the progress of the City of Rocky Mount’s
work toward meeting the intent of the Rule through new development review, illicit discharge
detection and elimination, identification of potential retrofit locations, and public education
and outreach.
In general, the city’s stormwater management program consists of thirty-nine and one-third
(39.33) full time operational and three and one-third (3.33) full time administrative
positions. The program is funded through a Stormwater Utility, established in 2003 for the
purpose of providing funding to support compliance with the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive
Waters Rule, the Water Supply Watershed rules, and the city’s NPDES Phase II permit. The
program’s projected Fiscal Year 2017 revenue is approximately $4.0 million.
II. Reporting Year October 2015 – September 2016
During the reporting year, the program focused on construction of capital projects, which
reduce flooding and improve water quality, as well as operational maintenance. Progress in
these areas is detailed below.
The following is a breakdown of the city’s stormwater program areas as specified by 15A
NCAC 2B.0258:
New Development Review and Approval
The city approved development plans for eleven projects falling under the criteria of the Tar-
Pamlico NSW Rule, totaling 494.5 acres (Battleboro Farm Solar Elec Power Plant, Battleboro
Solar Site, Homewood Suites, Hospira Haz. Storage Building, SECU – ATM Addition, CT
Trucking, Lot 15C & 15D Revised for Parking, Rocky Mount Mill Village, Hathaway Switching
Station, Rocky Mount Academy Storage Building, & NCDOR. Of these developments, seven
utilized a total of eight structural best management practices for nutrient reduction. Five
projects utilized the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank. 1577.22 pounds of nitrogen, and
203.89 pounds of phosphorous were purchased for mitigation from the bank. Hospira had
previously paid into the NCEEP for Nitrogen and Phosphorous mitigation credits. The total
net loading for the 2016 reporting period, including credit from the nutrient mitigation bank,
was 1422.78 pounds per year (2.88 lb/yr-ac) for nitrogen and 177.02 pounds per year (0.36
lb/yr-ac) for phosphorous. These net total loadings are below the goal of 4.0 and 0.40 lb/yr-
ac for Nitrogen and Phosphorous, respectively. For a more detailed summary, please refer to
Tables 1 and 2 in Appendix A.
Illicit Discharges
Minor discharges continue to be addressed through informal letters or phone calls to
residents or business owners. These included landscaping contractors blowing grass
clippings into storm drains or residents dumping leaves into ditches. Most of these incidents
were reported through the stormwater hotline in response to several ads run on the city’s
government access channel, CITY TV-19, asking for reports of this nature.
The program also issued three official Notices of Violation. Details regarding these violations
and their dispositions are:
- On February 9, 2016 personnel from our office inspected property
located at 1265 Independence Drive in Rocky Mount, North Carolina to
determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater
System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal discharge from a
broken sanitary sewer service located behind the building at 1265
Independence Drive, thereby at a location adjacent to a waterway that
Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report
City of Rocky Mount
2
enters into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System. The owner was
notified and the situation was resolved.
- On November 17, 2015, personnel from our office inspected property
located at 1129 and 1109-1115 N Fairview Road in Rocky Mount, North
Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount
Stormwater System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal
dumping of a stucco/paint type material into the parking lot storm drain
inlets, and thereby at a location that would enter into the City of Rocky
Mount Stormwater System. Eastern Environmental Management was
called out on Tuesday November 17, 2015 by Mr. Walt Crayton, the
owner. Apparently, some contractors doing some stucco repair had
improperly clean off their tools into (2) storm drains at 1129 N Fairview
Rd, Rocky Mount. EEM responded by vacuuming both storm drains out
and then flushing both storm drains with approximately 50 gallons of
water per storm drain. EEM also brushed off the tops of each storm
grate and lightly brushed the side walls from any residue. EEM collected
approximately 125 gallons of non-haz material for disposal.
- On June 01, 2016 personnel of this office inspected a car parked on the
street adjacent to 109 Justin Court. The inspection revealed a recent
accumulating oil leak as a result of a car parked on the street for an
extended period of time. We issued a Pre-NOV in lieu of a formal Notice
of Violation due to the fact that the noted violation does not pose an
immediate threat to life, property, or the environment. However, the
Pre-NOV indicated the potential violation must be corrected by July 15,
2016 to avoid issuance of a Notice of Violation. After discussions and
meetings with the car owner, the oil from a leaking car was removed from
the street.
- On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, a City of Rocky Mount employee observed a
Thompson Nursery employee disposing/blowing leaves/grass clippings onto the
street adjacent to 130 S Franklin Street Bank as part of the lawn maintenance
operation. This violated Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of
Ordinances which states the following regarding discharges to the stormwater
system. In the past, Thompson Nursery, Inc. has been found to be in violation of
Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances and was notified
of the violation; thereby, qualifying as a repeat offender. As a result of the repeat
violation, a civil penalty of $50.00 was accessed for this most recent incident. The
assessment amount was based on guidelines in City Ord Sec 10-216.
Efforts during FY 2017 will include:
- Continue efforts updating existing and formulation of new SWPPPs for
municipally owned facilities. Although Best Management Practices have
been implemented, formalizing the plan is needed.
- Collaborate with Bill Hunt of NCSU on the installation of a research
process/material that will further enhance to nutrient reduction
capabilities of wet ponds. This exciting and promising research includes
the installation of proprietary materials on/in the littoral shelf of wet
ponds, which will be performed by City forces. In addition, the City will
assist in monitoring the site.
Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report
City of Rocky Mount
3
- Further expansion of enforcement of the city’s IDDE ordinances,
including implementation of a more thorough training program for city
employees focusing on good housekeeping and illicit discharge response.
- Continue the routine cleaning of storm drains and the standard
maintenance of stormwater conveyances such as ditches, channels, and
swales.
- Continue Explore/Implement methods to promote the “Sodfather” video,
which explains the issues associated with blowing grass clippings into the
street and storm drainage.
Retrofit Opportunities
The city continues to investigate the feasibility of riparian buffer restoration in various
locations. Following Hurricane Floyd, many lots affected by flooding were bought by the city
using money from FEMA. Most of these properties border creeks or the Tar River, and have
little or no riparian buffer area, thus making them good candidates for restoration activities.
Additionally, the following three retrofit opportunities continue to be analyzed by the city:
1. Leggett Road Outfall to Tar River – Stream restoration.
2. Wilkins Street Outfall to Tar River – Stream relocation/restoration.
3. Boys & Girls Club – Construct BMP Between primary outlet and stream
to reduce nutrient discharge from site.
In addition to these three potential retrofit locations, as reported in the 2014
Annual Report, the city received a grant from the Clean Water Management Trust
Fund and has purchased two parcels of undeveloped land along Stoney Creek in
Rocky Mount in January 2013, which was listed as an impaired water on the
303(d) list. This property is the first in a series of acquisitions the city hopes to
make along Stoney Creek in order to construct a greenway and walking trail. In
addition, the city plans to study the feasibility of constructing an educational bmp
on the largest parcel (15.4 acres) that was acquired.
More detailed information regarding these potential retrofit sites and the Stoney Creek
properties can be found in Appendix C.
Public Education and Outreach
The Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule requires development of a locally administered
environmental education program to address nitrogen and phosphorous loading issues with
the public and with developers. In addition to education regarding nutrient transport and
water quality, the education program is also required to address peak stormwater flows with
developers.
A variety of activities have been identified for use in developing a comprehensive public
education program capable of satisfying the requirements of the rule. Point values were
assigned to each activity. Based on the points assigned, all affected local governments are
required to develop a plan comprised of activities that sum to at least 15 points per reporting
period. Over the past year, the city conducted activities with a total value of 38 points. These
activities include:
Arrange Speakers 21 points
Web Page/Web Site Links 2 points
Factsheets/Brochures/Flyers 2 points
Expand Adopt-A-Street 4 points
Environmental Hotline 3 points
Major Media Advertising 6 points
Tar-Pamlico NSW Rule 2016 Annual Report
City of Rocky Mount
4
In addition to those presentations listed in the point total in Appendix D, the City’s Keep
America Beautiful Coordinator attended several expos and disseminated stormwater
information and giveaways.
With regards to media advertising, the city continues to take part in the Clean Water
Education Partnership (CWEP), administered by the Triangle J Council of Governments.
CWEP allows member local governments to pool their resources to fund a comprehensive
public education program. Through CWEP, the city contributes toward the purchase of radio,
television, internet advertising, print, and cinema advertising.
In Rocky Mount, CWEP was able to run DENR’s Johnny Fishpatrick spot in local theatres in
the summer of 2015. The spot conveys general messages about sources of pollution and the
public’s role in preventing it in a family-friendly way. The spot was viewed 9,110 times.
CWEP also ran an online video pre-roll campaign in Fall 2015 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015-
2016 stormwater public outreach program. Video pre-roll is an advertising spot that is shown
before an on-line video clip. In the Rocky Mount jurisdiction, this pre-roll made 12,173
impressions. CWEP embarked on another program first in FY 16 with an online social media
campaign in Fall 2015. The Sodfather video was posted on a series of Facebook post which
sharing generated over 61,000 online impressions and had over 12, 000 views on Facebook
between August 20 and October 3, 2015. In addition, there was a high level of Facebook post
engagement with 505 post clicks, 223 likes, 19 comments and 72 shares. CWEP also
completed a FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign. The Spring campaign had three separate
components and features a new 30-second version of the Sodfather spot based on partner
feedback. The Spring campaign made 29,239 impressions within the City of Rocky Mount
jurisdiction. In an effort to reach across broader audiences CWEP maintained its internet
presence leading to an average of 2,068 unique visitors to www.NCcleanwater.org per month
for the 12-month period between July 2015 and June 2016. There were a total of 36,741 visits
to the website for the 12 month period between July 2015 and June 2016.
In addition to continuing the public education initiatives pursued through CWEP, the city
plans to expand the public education campaign for FY 17 by continuing to research the
effectiveness of the installation of drain markers in high priority areas for illegal discharge
detection. More detailed information related to the city’s public education efforts and the
television, radio, and internet campaigns spearheaded by CWEP is provided in Appendix D.
III.Program Summary
The City of Rocky Mount’s stormwater management program continues to prove itself to be a
leader in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. In the area of new development review, the city has
gained compliance and support from the local consulting and development community, and
continues to emphasize the importance of compliance in sustaining the valuable resource that
we are charged with protecting. Throughout the city, citizen involvement continues to grow,
leading to increased reporting of illicit discharges and illegal dumping. In addition, through
the joint public-private efforts, awareness of stormwater issues continues to trend upward,
resulting in increased water quality.
In the coming year, we will continue to ramp up enforcement of our IDDE ordinance, educate
the public through informational brochures and mailings, and implement training across the
city organization on good housekeeping practices for first line supervisors. Additionally, we
have completed construction on several large capital projects in an effort to reduce flooding
and improve water quality. In the coming year, we will undertake several additional capital
construction projects, and will continue to implement the recommendations from the
Battleboro Area Basin Study, with the intent of reducing flooding and improving water quality
in this area.
Appendix A
New Development Review Data
New development projects meeting rule criteria 11 494.5
New development projects requiring BMPs 7 106.87
New development projects requiring Peak Rate Match 6
II.
Wet Detention Pond
Stormwater Wetland
Sand Filter
Bioretention
Grass Swales
Dry Detention Pond
Vegetated Filter Strip With Level Spreader
Total Number of all BMPs Implemented
III.
Provide description of off-site options used for each project and calculations demonstrating how equivalent load reduction was achieved.
Please see the following pages for nutrient loading worksheets associated with the 11 projects which were approved during the reporting period.
Note: The dry ponds at Rocky Mount Mills - Mill Village, Hathaway Switching Station, & NCDOR serve as detention only.
IV.
Explain results of any applicable juisdictional review of planning issues.
None noted.
Annual Reporting Requirements for Tar-Pamlico River Basin NSW Stormwater Management Program
I.
Program Element: New Development Review / Approval
Total #
Acres
Total #
Projects
Development Types
3
1
8
Best Management Practice (BMP)
Nutrient Removal Efficiencies
Number of BMPs
implemented
2
2
V.
VI.
Total of newly completed projects 8
Projects submitting reports 65
Projects Inspected by the local government 26
Projects with significant deficiencies 6
Projects w/ significant deficiencies corrected 3
Projects w/ enforcement action taken 0
It continues to be a struggle to promptly receive all necessary documentation asssociated with newly installed BMPs. We routinely withhold certificates
of occupancy and/or performance bonds until O & M documents have been provided and recorded. With that being said, there is still an overall high
percentage of BMP maintenance compliance.
To date, the City has not had to pursue any enforcement action to gain compliance with the Rules. However, several of the private BMPs
within the City's stormwater system and subject to annual inspections did not submit an annual inspection report. If follow up with the responsible
parties to these BMPs does not produce results, the City may initiate action to inspect and, if necessary, repair the privately held BMPs and bill the
owners.
# of Projects
2012
# of Projects
2013
# of Projects
2014
Program Element: Compliance & Enforcement
# of Projects
2015
0 0
5
4 4
2
0
VII.
Provide description of any construction and / or O&M compliance issues.
VIII.
Provide description of any enforcement actions taken and provide the current status of the enforcement action.
Construction Projects with enforcement action taken
for deficient stormwater systems 0
Construction
Compliance & Enforcement
# of Projects
2016
87 8
Construction projects completed and signed off
4
4
# of Projects
2014
0
10
# of Projects
2015
Annual Reporting Requirements for Tar-Pamlico River Basin NSW Stormwater Management Program
# of Projects
2016
0 0
Operation and Maintenance
Compliance & Enforcement
# of Projects
2012
# of Projects
2013
5
56
5
2726
39
25
0
7
55
28
9
4
0
10 2
63
Transportation Impervious 0 0 0.32 29.36 0
Roof Impervious 0.08 0 0 20.88 0
Managed Pervious 73.47 26.1 3.26 61.37 4.24
Wooded Pervious 155.73 4.24 0 0 0.77
Transportation Impervious 1.26 0.09 0.37 0.02 29.35 0.01
Roof Impervious 0.1 0.02 0.14 0 20.89 0
Managed Pervious 74.05 27.01 0.18 0.17 61.37 0.35
Wooded Pervious 153.87 3.18 0 0 0 0
Total Project Acres 229.28 30.3 3.39 0.19 111.61 0.36
Nitrogen lbs/year 137.17 26.31 6.57 857.76
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.6 0.87 1.83 7.69
Phosphorous lbs/year 31.17 7.71 1.17 105.26
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.14 0.25 0.33 0.94
Nitrogen lbs/year 129.77 20.47 53.88 0.39 857.74 0.36
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.57 0.68 15.89 2.06 7.69 1
Phosphorous lbs/year 21.66 3.94 4.37 0.07 105.26 0.07
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.09 0.13 1.29 0.36 0.94 0.19
Number of BMPs 0 0 1 0 0 1
Nitrogen lbs/year 129.77 20.47 32.33 0.39 857.74 0.36
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 0.57 0.68 9.54 2.06 7.69 1
Phosphorous lbs/year 21.66 3.94 2.84 0.07 105.26 0.04
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.09 0.13 0.84 0.36 0.94 0.12
* Hospira previously purchased credits from NCEEP
SECU - ATM
Addition
(C1)Project ID / Catchment #
Battleboro Farm
Solar Elec
Power Plant
Battleboro Solar
Site
Hospira Haz
Storage Bldg.*
BMPs Implemented
Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export
Post Development Project Acreage (Acres)
TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE
TABLE 2
NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY
OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016
Homewood
Suites (C2)
Pre-Development Nutrient Export
Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export
Homewood
Suites (C1)
Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres)
Transportation Impervious 4.73 0 0.64
Roof Impervious 0 0 0.5
Managed Pervious 38.42 2.12 0.32
Wooded Pervious 0 0 0
Transportation Impervious 1.04 0.07 9.27 3.6 0.5 0.41
Roof Impervious 0.23 0 0.32 0.2 0 0.26
Managed Pervious 0.58 1.92 33.56 0.29 31.66 0.19
Wooded Pervious 0.00 0.35 0 0 0 0.00
Total Project Acres 2.30 2.34 6.5 4.99 31.66 0.99
Nitrogen lbs/year 166.97 21.48
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 3.87 13.02
Phosphorous lbs/year 25.82 1.78
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.6 1.08
Nitrogen lbs/year 24.5 2.29 114.64 80.89 27.25 12.75
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 10.65 0.98 17.64 16.21 0.85 12.88
Phosphorous lbs/year 2.2 0.43 8.53 6.02 5.28 1.06
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.95 0.18 1.31 1.21 0.16 1.07
Number of BMPs 1 0 1 1 0 1
Nitrogen lbs/year 14.7 2.29 85.98 60.67 27.25 10.20
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 6.39 0.98 13.23 12.16 0.85 10.31
Phosphorous lbs/year 1.43 0.43 5.12 3.61 5.28 0.85
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.62 0.18 0.79 0.72 0.16 0.86
Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres)
BMPs Implemented
Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export
Post Development Project Acreage (Acres)
TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE
TABLE 2
NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY TABLE
OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016
Predevelopment Nutrient Export
Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export
CT Trucking
(C2)
Hospira Haz
Storage Bldg.*
Lot 15C & 15D
Revised for
Parking
(C1)Project ID / Catchment #
SECU - ATM
Addition
(C2)
SECU - ATM
Addition
(C3)
CT Trucking
(C1)
Transportation Impervious 0.68 0.73 0.22 0.26
Roof Impervious 1.59 0 0 0.17
Managed Pervious 13.3 21.58 0 2.76
Wooded Pervious 0 15.09 13.56 0
Transportation Impervious 0.23 0.93 0.41 4.163 0.22 1.72
Roof Impervious 0.24 0.47 1.09 0 0.07 0.24
Managed Pervious 0.19 2.6 10.07 21.78 11.65 1.23
Wooded Pervious 0 0 0 11.48 1.84 0
Total Project Acres 0.66 4 11.57 37.39 13.78 3.19
Nitrogen lbs/year 49.23 37.32 7.89 7.78
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 3.16 1 0.57 2.44
Phosphorous lbs/year 7.98 9.71 1.15 1.33
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 0.51 0.26 0.08 0.42
Nitrogen lbs/year 8.52 23.67 26.89 72.24 12.09 37.22
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 12.91 5.92 2.32 1.93 0.88 11.67
Phosphorous lbs/year 0.79 3.22 4.64 11.69 2.27 3.88
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 1.19 0.81 0.4 0.31 0.16 1.22
Number of BMPs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nitrogen lbs/year 8.52 23.67 26.89 72.24 12.09 37.22
Nitrogen lbs/acre/year 12.91 5.92 2.32 1.93 0.88 11.67
Phosphorous lbs/year 0.79 3.22 4.64 11.69 2.27 3.88
Phosphorous lbs/acre/year 1.19 0.81 0.4 0.31 0.16 1.22
Hospira Haz
Storage Bldg.*NCDORProject ID / Catchment #
Lot 15C & 15D
Revised for
Parking
(C2)
Rocky Mount
Mill Village
(C1)
Rocky Mount Mill
Village
(C2)
BMPs Implemented
Post-development & Post-BMP Nutrient Export
Post Development Project Acreage (Acres)
TAR-PAMLICO STORMWATER RULE
TABLE 2
NEW DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS SUMMARY TABLE
OCT. 1, 2015 - SEPT. 30, 2016
Predevelopment Nutrient Export
Post-development & Pre-BMP Nutrient Export
Hathaway
Switching
Station
Pre-Development Project Acreage (Acres)
Units
1422.78
Acres
N lbs/yr
177.02
Sum of All Project Acres Post
Development
0.36
LOADING SUMMARY CALCULATIONS
N lbs/ac/yr
P lbs/yr
Sum of Nitrogen Load For All
Projects Post Development
N Load per acre per year for all
Projects Post Development
Sum of Phosporus Load For All
Projects Post Development
P Load per acre per year for all
Projects Post Development
2.88
(The Categories Listed Below Are Automatically Calculated)
P lbs/ac/yr
494.5
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Last Modified 9/25/2015 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Battleboro Farm Solar Electric Power Plant Date: 912512015 By: D.W.S Checked By: Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. >Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. !fall of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Formula Average EMC Column Average EMC Column <acres) l0.46 + 8.3n of TN lm!!/U (2). (3). (4) ofTP (m!!/U (2) • (3). (6) Transportation impervious 0.00 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00 Roof impervious 0.08 0.46 1.95 0.07 0.11 0.00 Managed pervious 0.00 0.46 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00 (lawn/landscaped) Managed pervious 0.00 0.46 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00 (cropland) Managed pervious 73.47 0.46 2.04 69.36 0.62 21.08 (pasture) Wooded pervious 155.73 0.46 0.94 67.74 0.14 10.09 Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.00 TN Loading 137.17 TP Loading 31.17 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)= Total Area of Development= 229.28 TN Exp. Coeff. 0.60 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.14 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) = Post-development: (l) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Formula Average EMC Column Average EMC Column (acres) (0.46 + 8.31) of TN (ml!/L) (2). (3). (4) ofTP (m!!/L) (2) • (3) • (6) Transportation impervious l.26 0.51 2.60 1.67 0.19 0.12 Roof impervious 0.10 0.51 1.95 0.10 0.11 0.01 Managed pervious 74.05 0.51 1.42 53.55 0.28 10.56 Wooded pervious 153.87 0.51 0.95 74.45 0.14 10.97 Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.01 TN Loading 129.77 TP Loading 21.66 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)= Total Area of Development= 229.28 TN Exp. Coeff. 0.57 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.09 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) = Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed.
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Last Modified 7/29/2015
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as we ll as Franklin , Nash and Edgecome Counties
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name: Battleboro Solar Site
Date: 611512015
By: Chris Lewis, PE Checked By : __________ _
Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
>Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue.
>Compare total areas of development in pre-and po st-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and al so for consistency with
the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected .
>Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site , offsite catchment are a draining in must
be in cluded in the acreage values and treated .
Pre-development:
······························Cl).•.••••······················· ••··••••••••Tr~ 0 rn~*~PW~f:•••••••••·•••
.... Trt~~~~~H~~i~#·~*~~~~tj~·······
~Wori~~&,1~tj~
~4~1~~~~7~~
•• Mi~n~g~~ i>~l'Vi~4~•••·•••••••···. ··•••••••••••••••••·•·•(fropl~#~)···•••••••••••••••••••
< ;n~:::&:~i ~~~
Post-development:
·······················•••(9 .••···························· ·····•·••IY~ tj(Lilfid Cov~t •••••• ••••••• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:::::~:::::~:f:::::~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::
•• t r~W,~~~~~~i ~#·~M~#~v~~~~··•••••
0.00
30.30
0.00
30.30
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.49
0.49
0.49
2.60
1.95
1.42
4.23
2.04
0.94
• TN~a~ing
••••••••••H 1 ~1frh
2.60
1.95
1.42
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.49
1.82
26.31
0.87
0.12
0.02
18.85
1.48
20.47
0.68
0.19
0.11
0.28
1.23
0.62
0.14
1~ ~~~l (jtj¢(t
@i~~&m
0.19
0.11
0.28
0.14
wr~~~d,~~g
··••••t .. • .. O*f#f~ 'tf ti()~ ptj~(f;
········•@i~~(yi')•••
J7(}
C-01 iliriii
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.44
0.27
7.71
0.25
0.01
0.00
3.72
0.22
3.94
0.13
Note: The nutrient loading goal s are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb /ac /yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates
post -development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are in stalled .
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Last Modified 9/16/2015 Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Homewood Suites (Lot 2A am/ 2C) Date: 911612015 By: K. Varnell Checked By: __________ _ Directions (same/or pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. > Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. >Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values and treated. Pre-development: ···············•·cir•••·············· rJ;;Wf~n;a~a, fi?t~r .. • Wt~~~~~rt~~1~# ~m~~~~6=~sii 11 i•i~d,#i,1~~et~1~~~ iii ••• ••·• • ... ~~r~~~~ ~th~#~•· , •·• •·••••••••<'*~*z'~MS,f:~~~v I iii iiiiiiiiii~i~il;:~~;::11:::1::::: 1 Iii ~~~~~~ ~W'~~~ I iii f:~~~j*" i~~~t~j~~~ ~WM i ••i W#~#~i~r~~ tj~ ~~~~,#~ill~~~ #ii• 1 Post-development: ••·••··•·••-•••-•••·•m•••·•••·•·•·•·•·•·•••-•· • Jypfii(Li@I Cov~r> ~ j i ~ ~ j ~ j j j j ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ j j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ j) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~~*~~*m~~i~#~*=~~~~i#~~ ••••••••••• ~~gi i~ ~~f~iW.4~ ••••.•.•.• • i ~~~¥,~~~ ~Wi*J~ i!i i I I I •I ~g~~e,~ ~Wi~~~ii • • • •••••··~~~~tjWrii~~~~&iW4~i~1>~i•••••·• I ill~~~~~~~~ ~t~~*W.'~~111~~~¥ I . "<<:::::::::::: k~~ 0.09 3.58 0.75 3.58 ••••--•-•••J~r-·•••••·•• ·•······•··•·-<1>:•••··••-•·• ••·••• •••<~>••••••• ii@J.1~~~ r(~4£~~;3i~a ~i~mgtili~~i ~~powmri 1.20 2.60 1.20 1.95 1.20 1.42 1.20 4.23 1.20 2.04 0.94 J~~~f!~>t!, ~M ~t~~~~ff r~f~ 6.70 2.60 6.70 1.95 6.70 1.42 0.95 • ••mm~~~~r! ~~~~~W:r;[s 1.00 0.19 0.o7 0.00 0.11 0.00 5.57 0.28 1.10 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 6.57 I : I~ ~~f ~f-~1 1.17 1.83 I ~ ~~1~~1~~f~I 0.33 •@ TH • J~f. THI :~1&~i~ ';( 36.43 I 0.19 I 2.66 7.84 8.47 0.00 52.75 14.73 0.11 0.28 0.14 •1 wt ~t;.~)ri~ J.m $~~~ cb*rr. ······•••(i~i~t1#)# 0.44 1.67 0.00 4.78 1.33 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed.
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Homewood Suites (Lot 2A and 2C) Date: 911612015 By: K. Varnell Directions: Checked By:------------Last Modified 5/23/03 > It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE: Unless runoff flowing onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated. >Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list for treating the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. lfmore than one BMP is to be used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks. >Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type ofland cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue boxes. NOTE: Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP worksheet tables, and also to the site plans, for consistency. All of these values need to be the same BMP Nutrient Removal Rates Catchment I: Total acreage of catchment 1 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate = TOTAL TN REMOVAL RA TE= :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;: ~~~~'*~~~@~ ~~~~~e~ ~~~~W~s w~~~~~~~M~J~· •••w~~~ t~~~~~·~~·~~k·• ·~r~~~J~·~~J~~W~4~ fo•+ rn~M ~r~~ •~r ~~~~1~~§~@~ p~~i~*~ta11d~r~··········•••·•··· w~~ p~~e#tj~~ ~~~4. ••••• ~iJ~ill~~i~~ wki1~~J • •• ··········•··~~w~ tiit~~··•••·•······ ·•••••.••:• ~-~~e~~~ti~~····••••••••• • v~ii~t!@l F,i~t~~ siHli wl • • ··•••·••• ~~y~i$J)j~~~fr••······· ••••.••.•• pi*ifoe~~iJ~··········• 40 ac % % % % 25 40 NC BMP Manual 40 35 NC BMP Manual 35 45 NC BMP Manual 35 45 NC BMP Manual 20 20 NC BMP Manual 20 35 NC BMP Manual 10 10 NC BMP Manual First BMP's TP removal rate=--% Second BMP's TP removal rate = •.· % Third BMP's TP removal rate= > % TOT AL TP REMOVAL RA TE= 35 % .. ••·•••••m•••••••••1•••H < <~~.•<< ~1~l.ti1j~i~ 0t±~1~z m 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 Pt~;;:BMPTN L#~@/yh# j~iJ~r.1@~1 ~~~~fr\ib,@*~).~ lrJ~i'.jj!vtf:iN 1.44~ d~1frj# J~~J~~Md~ ~i\i~frHbi~0f~)~ 37.70 8.20 4.97 0.00 3.01 53.88 15.89 32.33 9.54 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 rr~-~~P:j;~ J:itj~4 (llilyrk ~dfoaM#±l1 ~6~Jti~M>4 ~riit~#t:~h E.~i>!i~ K1b,i~iY~H 2.76 0.46 0.98 0.00 0.17 4.37 1.29 2.84 0.84
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Catchment 2: Total acreage of catchment 2 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate= TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= ....... >m . ·····•·••••rt~~~1i;;a,~~c;~m •••••trans~Jr~~tiJ~~~J~NWli~····· ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • • • • • ~~tjr iM#~~·~J~ • • •. • • ~~~~~~~~4~~~···· •. •. Wo~~~~ ~~*~~s ••••• Wr~~ t~~~~##·~~·~~r Catchment 3: Total acreage of catchment 3 = First BMP's TN removal rate= Second BMP's TN removal rate = Third BMP's TN removal rate= TOTAL TN REMOVAL RA TE= ••••••• ±~e~tWJ,ti~ ¢~~~~ •·•Wa~~*-i.~B.~w~~J~~i~~~-··•• ~JJm~JJWiJJ~ •••••• N'~~~~~ll:~t,ryW~$•••••···· .•..•.• ~~?~~~~~@~J,¥•••······· •••~~~~ t~~~*~•~~·~m••••· •mr~~~?:~•~*=P~hi~~~J~>µ,!•• 0 ------0 ac % fa>< BMP• TP ;omo,,J "" -t• r % Second BMP's TP removal rate= :i' , ' "o;': % % Third BMP's TP removal rate= •• , , ;, ~ ,,._:;' % % TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= 0 % ·~~~~~s~~l~lntr±~g[~~~ 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 ac % % % % 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 P:i~~~iN 1.1~~ dl#frf# *+~mr~.~ij; :rJ~ksi\iliHH~I ··~(i~b# ? r~~t:#Mfi# E;iJ;~r! (!~l~<!:Y'J. ~ 0.07 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.39 2.06 0.39 2.06 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 • • • H J?i~~JjMV: l:~ •H ~J.~d.Q.~MH ~~~~~~ ~~ E~pQ~ ,',', )~iii¥h"' . •. •. r~~ti~Mr, 'i:F, Jµtj~4 (.Wl)ir:H #~1,~m~[~~~~ e;,,, BMP', TP '="'' raIB--% Second BMP's TP removal rate= % Third BMP's TP removal rate= % TOTALTPREMOVALRATE= 0 % ••••••••••m•••••••••1•·•••••••·••~1~.·•••••• s~m14t!~j~~~ ~vf~~~z ·······(~} ........ , .. ·······••(6.)••········· A#f~f~M9~i ••••••TP<mi!'J.L1••••• 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.94 1.95 • Pt~~:BiVIP. TN 1,~@f:fr).µ ~-~~~~~.~~~~I ifo~t&Mf:iN 1.1~~ (li#jiffi. ~W,:,;~~~~~ 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.11 • • li~h~i\Jidi~ •• ~b,~4@1rn~ ~~·#mrt.b~~~Wia H• ·~<J~@Mr±ii •H ~J.~d. Q.~iYhY ~~1-~m~~M~r~r: Last Modified 5/23/03 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.o7 0.36 0.07 0.36
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments: · · · · · · · · · · · · ·· ··· · · · ·· · c~itifiti~rit ro:st~:&Mli • r~~~nMr • . . !: F~r<~~f~f ~ t~f.l.i.)~B~ ~~V:~td~~~~t A.ct~~~~ • • • tiiN !iW~d.i~i • tP: L.J.~~~~g • ... ·.·.·.·.·.·. ... (i)ii!~\<MF • (ibfa~irrf • 3.58 9.54 0.84 0.19 2.06 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 9.16 0.81 Last Modified 5/23/03 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then the BMPs planned are adequate. Otherwise, additional BMPs and/or modifications in development plans are required.
P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com
November 2, 2015
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate
Prepared by
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Unique Hotels, LLC
1101 Royal Ridge Drive
Rocky Mount, NC, 27804
Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184
Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 552.04 (lbs -N) and 5.58 (lbs - P)
8 digit-HUC: 03020101
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient mitigation requirements for the Homewood Suites Project by
paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank.
This Bank has received full payment towards the nutrient offset requirement for the above referenced project.
This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater
management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review
and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads
occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy
rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of
the stormwater permit as 552.04 lbs of nitrogen and 37.59 lbs of phosphorous.
Please note that the full amount of Phosphorus Offset required for this project, as specific by the City of Rocky
Mount’s authorization letter, has not been fully achieved through this transaction. To comply with the
authorization letter, and additional 32.01 lbs of Phosphorus Offset must be obtained through other sources.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment
into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich
Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111.
Sincerely,
Rich Mogensen, President
cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator
RECEIPT
NUTRIENT OFFSET PAYMENT
November 2, 2015
Bharat Patel
Unique Hotels, LLC
1101 Royal Ridge Drive
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Project Name: Homewood Suites
Local Government: City of Rocky Mount
Local Government Transaction Number: NP15102701
Basin: Tar-Pamlico
10-digit Catalog Unit: 0302010102
Phosphorous 32.01 Pounds @ $349.62/lb= $11,191.34
Check Number: 1009
Amount Paid: $11,191.34
The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has received payment for nutrient offset for the above referenced
project. Nutrient offset payments made to DMS as part of fulfilling the requirements of the Tar-Pamlico River
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy shall be at a rate specified in 15A NCAC 02R .0602. The
DMS, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the Division is responsible for the nutrient offset
requirements indicated above as required by the approval conditions.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated
with this activity including G.S. § 143-214.11. Payments into the Nutrient Offset Program are not transferable.
Refunds of payments made to DMS are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must be
submitted in accordance with the Division’s refund policy at www.nceep.net.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707-8915 or
kelly.williams@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Michael Ellison
Director
cc: Donald Perry, PE- Rocky Mount
Kevin Varnell- Stocks Engineering
Hazardous Storage Building
Hospira Incorporated
Rev. December 10, 2015
Page 6
3.1 STORMWATER QUALITY & QUANTITY
This small project will be a nearly imperceptible impact to stormwater quantity and quality but it is
but one set of improvements to be carried out concurrently with the R3 project. In order to show
the total impact of these two projects in one location for City review, we have compiled the project
information of the R3 project provided by Jacobs with the project information for this submittal.
The total development of built-upon area which is underway or under review is as follows:
3.01 PRIOR TO R3 PROJECT – PREDEVELOPMENT:
Transportation Impervious 27.41 acres
Roof Impervious 19.83 acres
Managed Pervious 64.37 acres
Total Site Area 111.61 acres
Percentage Impervious 42%
Total Impervious Surface 47.24 acres
3.02 AFTER R3 PROJECT IS COMPLETE:
Transportation Impervious 29.36 acres
Roof Impervious 20.88 acres
Managed Pervious 61.37 acres
Total Site Area 111.61 acres
Percentage Impervious 45%
Total Impervious Surface 50.24 acres
Total Increase in Impervious 3.00 acres
3.03 AFTER HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT IS COMPLETE:
Transportation Impervious 29.35 acres
Roof Impervious 20.89 acres
Managed Pervious 61.37 acres
Total Site Area 111.61 acres
Percentage Impervious 45%
Total Impervious Surface 50.24 acres
Total Increase in Impervious 0.00 acres
Total Increase as compared to Predevelopment: 3.00 acres
Since nutrient export is calculated based upon impervious surfaces, it is evident that the
Hazardous Storage Facility will reduce the nutrient export for this project. This reduction is
caused by the elimination of unneeded impervious surface in the form of a portion of the ABC
stone access area that is to be removed by the project.
3.04 CHANGE IN NUTRIENT LOADING DUE TO THE HW STORAGE BUILDING:
Our understanding is that the nutrient strategy described in the Jacobs report entitled SVP
Modernization; R1 Addition was approved by the City. This project will not increase the pounds
of nutrients to be purchased as summarized in the report.
Hazardous Storage Building
Hospira Incorporated
Rev. December 10, 2015
Page 7
The nutrient calculation for the project is attached showing the finished impervious surfaces proposed by
Jacobs as the PRE-DEVELOPMENT condition. The Hazardous Building project results in a very slight
reduction in nutrient export.
The Jacobs report indicates the following nutrient loading for the R3 project:
A. Nutrient Loading due to the R3 Project Approved in April 2015
Nitrogen
Total Post-Development Nitrogen 2013 8,791.20
Total Post-Development Nitrogen Incl. R3 8,916.30
Needed to be purchased 125.10 lbs.
Phosphorous
Total Post-Development Nitrogen 2013 118.20
Total Post-Development Nitrogen Incl. R3 125.70
Needed to be purchased 7.50 lbs.
B. Nutrient Loading due This Building Project
There is a slight reduction in nutrients because a very tiny fraction of transportation impervious is
converted to roof (=0.1 Ac.) and roof exports lower levels of nutrients than transportation (roadway).
Refer to the attached nutrient calculation sheet for the changes due to this project:
Change in Nitrogen Generation
Post-Development Nitrogen given for the R3 Project 857.76 lbs. per year
Post-Development Nitrogen given for HW Storage Facility 856.74 lbs. per year
Net Reduction in Nitrogen to be Purchased 0.02 lbs. per year
Total Reduction @ 30 Years 0.60 lbs.
Change in Phosphorous Generation
Post-Development Nitrogen given for the R3 Project 105.26 lbs. per year
Post-Development Nitrogen given for HW Storage Facility 105.26 lbs. per year
Net Reduction in Nitrogen to be Purchased 0.00 lbs. per year
Total Reduction @ 30 Years No Change
C. Nutrient Loading due to Both R3 and Hazardous Building Project
The net nutrient generation requiring purchase after this project (including the R3 Project in the Jacobs
Report):
Nitrogen = 125.10 lbs. – 0.60 lbs. = 124.50lbs.
Phosphorous = 7.50 lbs. – No Change
Hazardous Storage Building
Hospira Incorporated
Rev. December 10, 2015
Page 8
SUMMARY
This project is for the addition of a stand alone ATM machine and its associated
driveway. The ATM drive will be located at the SECU Peele Road entrance and will run along
Peele Road and have an exit onto Peele Road. The drive will be 12' wide and be only one way.
This project will add approximately 1,517 square feet of impervious surface to the site.
The site plan was originally designed and permitted in 2007 by EcoEngineering (part of
the John R. McAdams Company) in March of 2010. The approved design called for a large
wetland BMP to provide stormwater quantity control and stormwater quality treatment for
nitrogen and phosphorous . The BMP was designed for the credit union bu i lding and parking lot
and the addit ional undeveloped 1.89 acres west of the credit union but still the same parcel of
land . This means that the small addition of the ATM and drive lane do not require separate
BMPs because there is enough existing capacity to handle them. Excerpts from the previously
approved stormwater manual are included.
To check the nitrogen and phosphorous calculations the previously approved post
developed calculations were inputted into the spreadsheet as the predeveloped condition. The
additional impervious associated with the ATM was added to the post developed condition . The
resulting site totals of 3.47 lbs/ac/yr of nitrogen and 0.38 lbs/ac/yr of phosphorous are below
the threshold limit and do not require buy down payments .
The ATM drive pipe capacity was checked using Hydraflow Storm Sewers software
program. Rainfall data for Rocky Mount was used . The rational method was used to determine
the amount of storm water runoff. Calculations were run for the 10, 25, and 50 year storm. The
pipe a has ample capacity to handle the 50 year storm and still function in a non-pressurized
open channel flow condition .
The following pages include:
• Tar/Pam spreadsheet ATM addition
• Storm sewer pipe calculations
Previous stormwater calculations (EcoEngineering)
• Cover
• Stormwater narrative
• Drainage Map
• Design calculations
• Design calculations-future development
• NC DENR wetland design sheet
• As built stormwater wetland
• As built stormwater wetland -future development
• Tar/Pam spread sheet
• Tar/Pam spread sheet-future development
,·
' )\'I' • : !--~(.
Pnedml!}m <Olf Hue lfm -I ~mllk<l} Rn~,e~· lS:2shL.
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky i\l~!nt al~!:£~.!:_oas-~.~~~as ~~in ,0as h ,::n.5!_!~~~-?.~~~:,:;.~"'""'
!Total Nitrogen ai!]d TotaB JP'hosplhloms JLoadhllg CaRcuHatio[g 'VVorksll!eet r(!,.lil~oma[e.J)
;
Project Name: _ __::·_::_·_'__::_''--'-----------
Date: · • ,.,
By : .:)•' ~>!d,·:·:'i!!(, _o ,r.~ Checked By : -----
Directions (same for pre-development alld post-developmellt tables):
> Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue.
>Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with
the site plans . !fall of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected.
> Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through th e site, offsite catchment area draining in must
be included in the acreage values and treated.
· 1 ~o~ti~~er#i~~~ )
··············~~~~~#·w.~~~i?@ !·········
........
' ~~-i
O;,cJll
Qf(ID. · ..
j'~~(A;·~~ #t' Pey~i()~n1e~¢ ~ 5.00
_,
M 0.46
tJll 0.46
2.65
2.65
l 9 1
1.42
0.95
TN Loa din¢
(lb /;yr')"'
TN Exp. Coeff,
(tb/~c/y.r) =i
P oa
lb
(J
0
T L
(
p
24
0
0
0
13
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb /ac/yr for TN ancl 0.4 lb/Qc/yr for TP . If the post-deve lopment nutrient
lo8cling is below these levels, then no BMP is 11ecessary Otherwise the next wo;·ksheet calculates
post-developmenr TN <llld TP lo ~ding ' <lfter BMP~ are inswlled
I c
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28.0258
Piedmont oftbe Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Project Name: SECU-ATM ADDITION
Date : 12122120 IS
By : BJK
Last Modified 5/23/03
Counties
Checked By : __________ _
It may he advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow
development to be split into as many as three catchments , and can he copied for greater than three . NOTE : Unless runoff flowing
the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site , the offsite catchment area draining in must be
included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated .
Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank . Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP
coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4 .0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4lb/aciyr TP, select BMP(s) from the list
the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be
in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks.
Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light
NOTE : Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP
lw<>rk,,heet tables, and also to the site All of these values need to be the same
BMP
Nutrient
Removal
Rates
Catchment 1:
Total acreage of catchment I
First BMP's TN removal rate
Second BMP's TN removal rate
Third BMP's TN removal rate
TOTALTNREMOVALRATE=--~~--
acO•~
%
%
%
%
40 35
35 45
35 45
20 20
20 35
10 10
First BMP's TP removal rate
Second BMP's TP removal rate
Third BMP's TP removal rate
TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE=
1.95 0.00
1.42 0.34
0.94 0.00
NC BMP Manual
NC BMP Manual
NC BMP Manual
NC BMP Manual
NC BMP Manual
NC BMP Manual
%,~
%
%
%
0.11 0.00
0 .28 O.o?
0.14 0.00
0.00
0.07
0.19
0.04
0.12
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
\llk
o-:t3
D ·~
().0
D·'f5
o.D'J
o.vD
\·9~
0·3'5 o.o
Catchment 2:
Total acreage of catchment 2
First BMP's TN removal rate
Second BMP's TN removal rate
Third BMP's TN removal rate
TOTALTNREMOVALRATE =----~--
~~~~+.+~~~~
Tota I acreage of catchment 3
First BMP's TN removal rate
Second BMP's TN removal rate
Third BMP's TN removal rate
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE=
2 .3
y.O
5.05
5.05
5.05
ac:J..3~
%
%
%
%
0.71
0.71
0.71
First BMP's TP removal rate
Second BMP's TP removal rate
Third BMP's TP removal rate
TOTALTPREMOVALRATE=----~~---
1.95 2.26 0.11
1.42 4.16 0.28
0.94 0.00 0.14
First BMP's TP removal rate
Second BMP's TP removal rate
Third BMP's TP removal rate
TOTALTPREMOVALRATE=
1.95 0.00 0.11
1.42 1.93 0.28
0.94 0.23 0.14
Last Modified 5/23/03
0.13
0.82
0.00
0.25
2.20
0.95
1.43
0.62
%
%
%
%
0.00
0.38
0.03
0.00
0.43
0.18
0.43
0.18
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28.0258 Last Modified 5/23/03
3.47
:;:::;:;:;:::;:;:-:.:--:-:;:<··················· w.~ ~~~R~~~*=r~~i$ s.oo 0.38
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0 .4lb/ac/yr for TP . Iftbe post-development nutrient
loading is below tbese levels, tben tbe BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, additional BMPs and/or
modifications in development plans are required .
ADDENDUM TO
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
C.T. TRUCKING
Fountain Industri al Park
Rocky Mount, NC
ACE J N: 15.065
v. 1 .0, 9.30 .15
v. 2.0, 10 .22.15
v.3 .0, 3 .18.16
Revised stormwater nutrient calculations
herein are based on the acquisition of the
additional adjacent 14.67 acres in Fountain
Industrial Park.
Total Area = 28.48 + 14 .67 = 43.15 ac
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA
CIVIl, MUNICIPAl & STRUCTURAl ENGINEERS
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAl SERVICES
P.O. Box 7966 • Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Phone : (252) 972-7703
Fax :(252)972-7638
www.appianengineers.com
Tar-Pamlico StormwaterRule 15A NCAC 28.0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Mount and Tarboro as well as
Project Name: CT Trucking-Fountain Industrial Park-including adjacent property of 14.67 acres
Date : 3.18.16
Last Modified 3/18/2016
Counties
By: Appian Consulting Engineers, dcr Checked By :-----------
ID.irt>,('fi•1n.~ (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue .
Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consi stency with
site plans . If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected .
Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must
included in the values and treated .
1.37 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
1.37 1.42 74.79 0.28 14.75
1.37 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00
1.37 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
1.37 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
: ~: ~~~~ii~ r~~~!-Y!q~~4H: ~: 0.11 15.98
: :t~~ :~!"~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ : 43.15 0.37
2.31 1.95 1.44 0.11 0.08
2.31 1.42 109.93 0.28 21.68
2.31 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00
::: ~r~c~~ ~~P~rri~t.~:(l) ~::: 0.22 25.82
: :to:t~i :A.re~:~t ~~v~~p~~"~ ~ : 43.15 0.60
Note: The nutrient loading goal s are 4 .0 lb/ac /yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels , then no BMP is necessary . Otherwi se, the next worksheet calculates
post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed.
Tar-Pamlico Storrnwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Incl udes Oxford, Henderson, Mount an d Tarboro as well as
BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name : CT Trucking at FIP-WET PONDS, including adj. 14.67 acres
Date : 3.18.16
Counties
By : Appian Consulting Engineers, dcr Checked By :-----------
Last Mod ifie d 5/23/03
It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs . The tables below allow
development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three . NOTE : Unless runoff flowing
the development from offsite is routed separately aro und or through the site , the offsite catchment area draining in must be
in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated .
A bove ea ch t able: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP
coefficients you calculated above to the ru le requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP , se lect BMP(s) from the list for
the catchment runoff Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks . If more than one BMP is to be
in series, the combined removal rates will be calcu late d automaticall y in the blue blanks .
Catchment Tables : Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes . The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue
NOTE : Compare the Total Catchment Ac reage for th e Deve lopme nt (final table) to the value yo u established in the pre-BMP
l w.~rk<h ,,t tables , and also to the site All
BMP
Nutrient
Removal
Rates
Catchment 1:
Total acreage of catchment I =
First BMP's TN removal rate =
Second BMP's TN removal rate =
Third BMP's TN removal rate =
TOTALTNREMOVALRATE =--~~--
......
0 ••••• 0 • • • • • • • •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
• 0 • 0 ••••••• 0 •••• 0 •• 0
• 0 0 ••••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0
• 0 • 0 ••••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 ••• 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0
7.22
7.22
7.22
40 35
35 45
35 45
20 20
20 35 NC BMP Manua l
10 10 NC BMP Manua l
First BMP's TP removal ra te = %
Second BMP's TP removal rate = %
Third BMP's TP removal rate = %
TOTAL TP REMOVAL RAT E=-----------%
1.95 1.69 0.11 0.10
1.42 3.18 0.28 0.63
0.94 0.00 0.1 4 0.00
0.72
8.53
1.31
5.12
0.79
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258
Catchment 2:
Total acreage of catchment 2 = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate = %
Second BMP's TN removal rate = %
Third BMP's TN removal rate = %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE = _ ___;::..:... __ %
Total acreage of catchment 3 =
First BMP's TN removal rate
Second BMP's TN removal rate
Third BMP's TN removal rate
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE = _ __::....__
O.o2
32.16
............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ••
• • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • ••••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ••
• • • • 0 ••• 0 • • • • • • ••••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ••
•• 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••
• • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •• 0
•••••••• 0 • • • • • 0 ••••
6.79
6.79
6.79
0.59
0.59
0.59
First BMP's TP removal rate = %
Second BMP's TP removal rate %
Third BMP's TP removal rate %
TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= __ ___.:.:;___ __ %
1.95 2.65
1.42 2.80
0.94 0.00
First BMP's TP removal rate =
Second BMP's TP removal rate =
T hird BMP's TP removal rate =
0.11
0.28
0.14
TOTAL TP R EMOVAL RATE =-----=---
1.95 0.00 0.11
1.42 26.49 0.28
0.94 0.00 0.14
Last Modified 5/23/03
0.15
0.55
0.00
0.67
6.02
1.21
3.61
0.72
0.00
5.22
0.00
0.00
5.28
0.16
5.28
0.16
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : btte,int!nt: : ~o.st~~M"~: : : : : I>J>st~MF: :
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~:~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~it~:~7~ ~
6.50 13.23 0.79
4.99 12.16 0.72
31.66 0.85 0.16
43.15 4.02 0.32
Last Modified 5/23/03
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels, then the BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, additional BMPs and /or
modifications in development plans are required .
P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com
1 April, 2016
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate
Prepared by
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Purchaser Address:
CT Management Inc.
PO Box 850
Claremont, NC 28610
Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184
Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 25.89 (lbs -N)
8 digit-HUC: 03020101
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient and/or buffer mitigation requirements for the CT Trucking –
Fountain Industrial Park by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank.
This Bank has received full payment towards the nutrient offset requirement for the above referenced project.
This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater
management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review
and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads
occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy
rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of
the stormwater permit as 25.89 lbs of nitrogen.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment
into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich
Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111.
Sincerely,
Rich Mogensen, President
cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator
P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com
June 28, 2016
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate
Prepared by
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Mr. Robbie B. Davis
Wright Development Corporation
PO Box 7515
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184
Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 46.04 (lbs -N)
8 digit-HUC: 03020101
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
You have elected to fulfill your permitted Nitrogen offset mitigation requirements for the Merchant Court Parking
Lot by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank.
This Bank has received full payment towards the Nitrogen offset requirement for the above referenced project.
This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater
management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review
and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads
occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy
rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of
the stormwater permit as 46.04 lbs of nitrogen and 6.44 lbs of phosphorous. Please note that you will need to
purchase Phosphorus credits from another agency in order to fully satisfy the mitigation requirements for your
project.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment
into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich
Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111.
Sincerely,
Rich Mogensen, President
cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator
II
fl CoulterJ Jewell f Thames ,"
Project Name : Rocky Mount Mills -Village
Project Number: 1445
By : CLJ
Date: 02 .10 .16
Nutrient Analysis Summary
.::>11e t-'os1 ueve1opmem NUtnem
Export lb/ac/yr
Nitrogen 3.16
Phosphorus 0.51 lsite Area
I Export Limits (lbs/ac/yr)
Project Location I Nitrogen Phosphorus
Tar-Pamlico I 4 .0 0.4
Resulting Nutrient Export for treatment
(lbs/ac/yr)
Nitrogen none
Phosphorus 0.11
Nutrient Export reduction to be met with offsite
payment (lbs)
Nitrogen none
Phosphorus 51.38
Revised :
Date:
II
15.57 acres
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Last Modified 2/10/2016
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name: Rocky Mount Mill -Village
Date: 02.10.16
By : CLJ Checked By: __________ _
Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
> Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue .
> Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with
the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected.
>Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be
included in the acreage values and treated.
Pre-development:
(3) (4)
S.M. Formula Average EMC
0.46 + 8.31 of TN m
Transportation impervious 1.67 2.60 2.96 0.19 0.22
Roof impervious 1.67 1.95 5.18 0.11 0.29
1.67 1.42 31.57 0.28 6.22
1.67 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00
1.67 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
1.67 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
Fraction Impervious (I) = 0.15 TN Loading 39.71 TPLoading 6.73 (lb/yr)= (lb/yr)=
Total Area of Development = 15.57 TN Exp. Coeff. 2.55 TP Exp. Coeff. 0.43 (lb/ac/yr) = (lb/ac/yr) =
Post-development:
(3) (4)
Transportation impervious 2.01 2.60 7.00 0.19 0.51
Roof impervious 2.01 1.95 6.11 0.11 0.34
2.01 1.42 36.12 0.28 7.12
2.01 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00
7.98
0.51
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates
post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed .
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name: Rocky Mount Mill -Village
Date: 02.10.16
By : CI.J
Directions:
Checked By : __________ _
Last Modified 5/23/03
> It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables below allow
the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE: Unless runoff flowing
onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be
included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated.
> Above each table: Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blank. Based on a comparison of the post-development TN and TP
export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4.0 lb/ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list for
treating the catchment runoff. Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be
used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks.
> Catchment Tables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue
boxes. NOTE: Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP
worksheet tables , and also to the site plans, for consistency. All of these values need to be the_s_a_m_e-.------------~
p Design Standard
BMP NC BMP Manual
Nutrient Stormwater Wetland 40 35 NC BMP Manual
Removal Sand Filter 35 45 NC BMP Manual
Rates Bioretention 35 45 NC BMP Manual
Grass Swale 20 20 NC BMP Manual
tated Filter Strip w/ 20 35 NC BMP Manual Level Spreader
Dry Detention 10 10 NC BMP Manual
Catchment I:
Total acreage of catchment I = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate = % First BMP's TP removal rate= %
Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate = %
Third BMP's TN removal rate = % Third BMP's TP removal rate = %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= %
(1) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC of
0.46 + 8.31 TN m
Transportation impervious 3.37 2.60 8.15 0.19 0.60
Roof impervious 3.37 1.95 3.09 0.11 0.17
Managed pervious 3.37 1.42 12.44 0.28 2.45
Wooded pervious 3.37 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
Area taken up by BMP 3.37 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Fraction Impervious (I) = 0.35 Pre-BMPTN 23.67 Pre-BMPTP 3.22 Load (lb/yr) = Load (lb/yr) =
Total Area of Development = 4.00 Pre·BMPTN 5.92 Pre-BMPTP 0.81 Export (lb/ac/yr) = Export (lb/ac/yr) =
23.67 Post-BMPTP 3.22 Load (lb/yr) = Load (lb/yr) =
Post·BMPTN 5.92 Post-BMPT 0.81 Export (lb/ac/yr) Export (lb/ac/yr)
Ta r-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Catchment 2 :
Total acreage of catchm ent 2 = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate = %
Second BMP's TN removal rate= %
Th ird BMP's TN removal rate = %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % -----
(1)
Type of Land Cover
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed pervious
Wooded pervious
Area taken up by BMP
Fraction Impervious (I ) =
Total Area of Development= 11.57
Catchment 3:
Total acreage of catchment 3 = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate = %
Second BMP's TN removal rate = %
Thi rd BMP's TN removal ra te = %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % -----
(1)
Type of Land Cover
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed pervious
Wooded pervious
Area taken up by BMP
Fraction Impervious (I ) =
Total Area of Development =
First BMP's TP removal rate =
Second BMP's TP removal rate =
Third BMP's TP removal rate=
TOTAL TP REMOVAL RA TE =
5)
1.64
3.27
21 .98
0.00
0.00
26.89
Pre-HMP TN Ex port 2.32 (lb/ac/yr ) =
Post-BMPTN 26.89 Load (lb/yr ) =
Poot·BMP TN 2.32 Export (lb/ac/yr)
First BMP's TP removal ra te=
Second BMP's TP removal rate =
Third BMP's TP removal rate=
TOTAL TPREMOVALRATE=
1.95
1.42
0.94
1.95
0
(6)
0.19
0.11
0.28
0.14
0.11
Pre-BMPTP
Load (lb/yr ) =
Prt-HMP T P Ex port
(lb/ac/yr ) =
Post-BMP T P
Load (lb/yr ) =
Post·BMP TP Expor
(lb/ac/yr )
0
(6)
0.11
0.28
0 .14
0.11
Pre-BMPTP
Load (lb/yr ) =
Pre-HMP T P Ex port
(lb/ac/yr ) =
Post-BMPTP
Load (lb/yr) =
Post-BMP TP Ex po
(l b/ac/yr )
Last Modified 5/23103
%
%
%
%
(7 )
0.12
0.18
4 .33
0.00
0.00
4.64
0.40
4.64
0.40
%
%
%
%
(7)
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Weighted A verage of N utrient Loadings from the Catchments:
Catchment 1
Catchment 2
Catchment 3
TOTAL FOR DEVELOPMENT
Cate
Ac
~ __,.._.,., .,,,.-. --,,. ':: ": -.... ..-;~· ..... ~ ... ~ ::·
~~~ ' . ·:;, ,~.&·~=-·~. ~···j
4.01 5.92 0.81
11.57 2.32 0.40
0.00 0.00 0.00
15.58 3.25 0.51
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels , then the BMPs planned are adequate. Othe1wi se, additional BMPs and/or
modifications in de velopment plans are required .
Last Mod ified 5/23/03
P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com
April 21, 2016
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate
Prepared by
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Rocky Mount Mill, LLC.
2619 Western Blvd.
Raleigh, NC, 27606
Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184
Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 44.61 (lbs - P)
8 digit-HUC: 03020101
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient and/or buffer mitigation requirements for the Rocky Mount
Mill (Mill Village along River Drive) project by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank.
This Bank has received full payment towards a portion of the phosphorus offset requirement for the above
referenced project. This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to
implement stormwater management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of
Rocky Mount must review and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options
to offset nutrients loads occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable
per this nutrient strategy rule. The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset
necessary for approval of the stormwater permit as 51.38 lbs of phosphorous. As Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. is
only able to provide 44.61 lbs of phosphorus at this time, please note that the remaining balance must be obtained
from another source in order to fully comply with the specified mitigation requirements.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment
into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich
Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111.
Sincerely,
Rich Mogensen, President
cc: DWQ-Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Last Modified 2/22/2016
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name: Hathaway Switching Station
Date : 212612016
By : Doug Chalmers Checked By :
Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
~~~~~~~~~~-
> Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue .
> Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with
the site plans . If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected.
> Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site , offsite catchment area draining in must be
included in the acrea e values and treated .
Pre-development:
(1)
Type of Land Cover
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed pervious
(lawn/landscaped)
Managed pervious
(cropland)
Managed pervious
(pasture)
Wooded perv ious
Fraction Impervious (I)=
Total Area of Development=
Post-development:
(l)
Type of Land Cover
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed perviou s
Wooded pervious
Fraction Impervious (I)=
Total Area of Development=
(2)
Area
O.o2
37.39
(2)
Area
0.11
37.39
(3) (4)
S.M. Formula Average EMC
0.46 + 8.3I of TN m /L
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
(3)
2.60
1.95
1.42
4.23
2.04
0.94
TN Loading
(lb/yr)=
TN Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =
(4)
S.M. Formula Average EMC
0.46 + 8.3I of TN m /L
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
2.60
1.95
1.42
0.95
TN Loading
(lb/yr)=
TN Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =
(5)
1.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.34
8.81
37.32
1.00
(5)
14.78
0.00
42.60
15.02
72.40
1.94
(6)
Average EMC
ofTP m /L
0.19
0.11
0.28
1.23
0.62
0.14
TP Loading
(lb/yr)=
TP Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =
(6)
0.19
0.11
0.28
0.14
TP Loading
(lb/yr)=
TP Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =
(7)
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.31
1.31
9.71
0.26
(7)
1.08
0.00
8.40
2.21
11.69
0.31
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0 .4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nu tri ent
loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates
post-development TN and TP loadings afte r BMPs are installed.
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28 .0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
In c lud es Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mo unt and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
BMP Removal Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name : Hathaway Switching Station
Date : 112611016
By Doug Chalmers
Dire ctions:
Checked By : ___________ _
Last Mod ified 5/23/03
> It may be advantageous to split the development into separate catchments to be handled by separate BMPs. The tables be low allow
the development to be split into as many as three catchments, and can be copied for greater than three. NOTE Unless runoff flowing
onto the development from offsite is routed separately around or through the site, the offsite catchment area draining in must be
included in the acreage values of the appropriate land use(s) and treated .
>A bove each table : Enter the catchment acreage in the top green blan k. Based on a comparison of the post-d evelo pment TN and TP
export coefficients you calculated above to the rule requirements of 4 .0 lb /ac/yr TN and 0.4 lb /ac /yr TP, select BMP(s) from the list fo r
treating the catchment runoff Enter the chosen BMP(s) nutrient removal rates in the green blanks. If more than one BMP is to be
used in series, the combined removal rates will be calculated automatically in the blue blanks .
>C atchment T ables: Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the light blue
boxes. NOTE Compare the Total Catchment Acreage for the Development (final table) to the value you established in the pre-BMP
worksheet tables, and also to the site plans , for consistency. All of these values need to be the same
BMP
Nutrient
Removal
Rates
Catchment I:
W e t Detentio n P ond
Stormwa t e r Wetl a nd
Sand F ilter
Bi o r etenti on
G rass Swale
V eget a t e d F ilte r Strip w /
Level S preader
D ry Detentio n
Total acreage of catch ment I = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= %
Second BMP's TN removal rate = %
Third BMP's TN removal rate= %
TOT AL TN REMOVAL RA TE = 0 % -----
(1) (3)
T y pe of L and Cover
Transportation impervio u s 1.38
Roof impe rvio u s 1.38
M anaged pervio u s 1.38
W oo ded pervi ou s l.38
A rea taken up by BMP 1.38
Fraction Impervious (I)= 0.1 l
Total Area of Develo pment = 37.39
TN TP Design Standard
25 40 NC B M P M anual
40 35 NC BMP M anual
35 45 NC B MP Manu a l
35 45 NC B M P Manu a l
20 20 NC B M P Manual
20 35 NC B M P M anual
10 10 NC B M P M anual
First BMP's TP removal rate = %
Second BMP's TP removal rate = %
Third BMP's TP removal rate= %
TOT AL TP REMOVAL RA TE= 0 % -------
(4) (5) (6) (7)
2.60 14.78 0.1 9 1.08
1.95 0.00 0 .11 0 .00
1.42 42.60 0 .28 8.40
0 .9 4 14.86 0 .14 2.21
l.95 0.00 O.ll 0.00
P r e-BMPTN 72.24 P r e-BM PTP 11.69 Load (lb/yr)= Load (lb/y r )=
P re-BMPTN 1.93 P re-BMP TP 0.31 Export (lb/ac/yr) = Ex port (lb/ac/yr) =
P os t-BMP TN 72.24 Post-BMP TP 11.69 Load (lb/yr) = Load (l b/y r ) =
Post-BMPTN 1.93 Post-BM P T P 0 .31 Export (lb/a d yr) = Export (lb/ac/y r) =
Tar-Pamlico Storm water Rule 15A NCAC 28 . 0258
Catchment 2:
Total acreage of catchment 2 = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate = %
Second BMP's TN removal rate = %
Third BMP's TN removal rate= %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % -----
(I) (3)
First BMP's TP removal rate=
Second BMP's TP removal rate=
Third BMP's TP removal rate=
TOTALTPREMOVALRATE =
(4) (5)
Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC o
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed pervious
Wooded pervious
Area taken up by BMP
Fraction Impervious (I)=
Total Area of Development=
Catchment 3:
0.00
0.46 + 8.31 TN m /L
2.60
l.95
1.42
0.94
1.95
Pre-BMPTN
Load (lb/yr) =
Pre-BMP TN Export
(lblac/yr) =
Post-BMPTN
Load (lb/yr) =
Post·BMPTN
Export (lblac/yr) =
Total acreage of catchment 3 = ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= %
Second BMP's TN removal rate = %
Third BMP's TN removal rate= %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 0 % -----
(I) (3)
First BMP's TP removal rate=
Second BMP's TP removal rate =
Third BMP's TP removal rate=
TOTALTPREMOVALRATE=
(4) (5)
Type of Land Cover S.M. Formula Average EMC o
Transportation impervious
Roof impervious
Managed pervious
Wooded pervious
Area taken up by BMP
Fraction Impervious (I)=
Total Area of Development= 0.00
0.46 + 8.31 TN m /L
2.60
1.95
l.42
0.94
l.95
Pre-BMPTN
Load (lb/yr) =
Pre-BMP TN Export
(lb/aclyr) =
Post-BMPTN
Load (lb/yr) =
Post-BMPTN
Export (lblac/yr) =
Last Modified 5/23/03
%
%
%
0 %
(6) (7)
Average EMC o
TP m /L
0.19
0.11
0.28
0.14
0.11
Pre-BMPTP
Load (lb/yr) =
Pre-BMP TP Export
(lb/ac/yr) =
Post-BMP TP
Load (lb/yr) =
Post-BMP TP Export
(lb/ac/yr) =
%
%
%
0 %
(6) (7)
Average EMC o
TP m /L
0.19
0.11
0.28
0.14
0.11
Pre-BMPTP
Load (lb/yr)=
Pre-BMP TP Export
(lb/ac/yr) =
Post-BMP TP
Load (lb/yr)=
Post-BMP TP Export
(lb /aclyr) =
Tar-Pamlico Stormwa ter R ule 15A NCAC 28 .0258 Last Mod ified 5/23 /03
Weighted Average of Nutrient Loadings from the Catchments:
C a tc hm en t Post-BMP P os t-BMP
Acreage TN Loading T P Loading
(lb/ac/yr) (lb/a c/yr)
Catchm ent I 37.39 1.93 0.31
C atchment 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cat chment 3 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOT AL F OR DEVELOPMENT 37.39 1.93 0.31
Note : The nutrient loading goals are 4 .0 lb /ac /yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac /yr for TP . If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels , then the BMPs planned are adequate . Otherwise, addit ional BMPs and /or
modifications in development plans are required .
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 2B .0258 Last Modified 8/2/2016
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name:Rocky Mount Academy - Parcel # 018672 (southern-most tract)
Date:7/8/2016
By:T. Andy Lamm, PE Checked By:
Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
Pre-development:
(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Area
(acres)
S.M. Formula
(0.46 + 8.3I)
Average EMC
of TN (mg/L)
Column
(2) * (3) * (4)
Average EMC
of TP (mg/L)
Column
(2) * (3) * (6)
0.22 0.59 2.60 0.34 0.19 0.02
0.00 0.59 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
0.00 0.59 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00
0.00 0.59 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00
0.00 0.59 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
13.56 0.59 0.94 7.55 0.14 1.13
0.02 TN Loading
(lb/yr) =7.89 TP Loading
(lb/yr) =1.15
13.78 TN Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =0.57 TP Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =0.08
Post-development:
(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Area
(acres)
S.M. Formula
(0.46 + 8.3I)
Average EMC
of TN (mg/L)
Column
(2) * (3) * (4)
Average EMC
of TP (mg/L)
Column
(2) * (3) * (6)
0.22 0.64 2.60 0.36 0.19 0.03
0.07 0.64 1.95 0.09 0.11 0.01
11.65 0.64 1.42 10.52 0.28 2.07
1.84 0.64 0.95 1.11 0.14 0.16
0.02 TN Loading
(lb/yr) =12.09 TP Loading
(lb/yr) =2.27
13.78 TN Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =0.88 TP Exp. Coeff.
(lb/ac/yr) =0.16
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.4 lb/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates
post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed.
Roof impervious
Type of Land Cover
Managed pervious
Managed pervious
(cropland)
(1)
Transportation impervious
> Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue.
> Compare total areas of development in pre- and post- tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with
the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected.
> Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must
be included in the acreage values and treated.
(1)
Type of Land Cover
Managed pervious
(pasture)
Transportation impervious
Total Area of Development =
Fraction Impervious (I) =
Managed pervious
(lawn/landscaped)
Wooded pervious
Total Area of Development =
Wooded pervious
Fraction Impervious (I) =
Roof impervious
2016-01587
Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 2B .0258
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin:
Includes Oxford,Henderson,Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin,Nash and Edgecome Counties
Last Modified 4/25/2016
Total Nitrogen andTotal Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name:NCDOR
Date:
By:Murk Russell, PE Checked By:
Directions (samefor pre-development andpost-development tables):
>Enter the acres of each type of land cover inthe green boxes.The spreadsheet will calculate allofthe values in light blue.
>Compare total areas of development in pre-and post-tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)),and also for consistency with
the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected.
>Unless drainage ontothe development from offsite is diverted around or through thesite,offsite catchment area draining inmust
be included in the acreage values and treated.
Pre-development:
(1)
Type of Land Cover
(2)
Area
(acres)
(3)
S.M.Formula
(0.46 +8.31)
(4)
Average EMC
ofTN(mg/L)
(5)
Column
(2W3W4)
(6)
Average EMC
ofTP(mg/L)
(7)
Column
(2)* (3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 1.58 2.60 1.07 0.19 0.08
Roof impervious 1.58 1.95 0.52 0.11 0.03
Managed pervious
(lawn/landscaped)1.58 1.42 6.19 0.28 1.22
Managed pervious
(cropland)1.58 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00
Managed pervious
(pasture)1.58 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
Wooded pervious 1.58 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
Fraction Impervious (I) =0.13
TN Loading
(Ib/yr)=7.78
TP Loading
(Ib/yr)=1.33
Total Area of Development =3.19
TN Exp.Coeff.
(Ib/ac/yr)=2.44
TP Exp.Coeff.
(Ib/ac/yr)=0.42
Post-development:
(1)
Type of Land Cover
(2)
Area
(acres)
(3)
S.M.Formula
(0.46 +8.31)
(4)
Average EMC
ofTN(mg/L)
(5)
Column
(2)* (3)*(4)
(6)
Average EMC
ofTP(mg/L)
(7)
Column
(2)*(3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 5.57 2.60 24.89'0.19 1.82
Roof impervious 5.57 1.95 2.60 0.11 0.15
Managed pervious 5.57 1.42 9.72 0.28 1.92
Wooded pervious 5.57 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00
Fraction Impervious (1) =0.61
TN Loading
(Ib/yr)=37.22
TP Loading
(Ib/yr)=3.88
Total Area of Development =3.19
TN Exp.Coeff.
(Ib/ac/yr)=11.67
TP Exp.Coeff.
(Ib/ac/yr)=1.22
Note: Thenutrientloadinggoalsare4.0 lb/ac/yrforTNand0.4 lb/ac/yrforTP. If the post-development nutrient
loadingis belowthese levels,thenno BMPis necessary.Otherwise,thenext worksheet calculates
post-developmentTN and TP loadingsafter BMPsare installed.
NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION PAYMENT SUMMARY
Jurisdiction:
Basin:
Project Name:
Address:
Engineer of Record:
Date:
Rocky Mount
Tar/Pamlico
NCDOR -Rocky Mount
811 Country Club Road
Mark Russell,PE
Site Characteristics
Acreage
Redevelopment Site:
BMP(s)Utilized:
3.190 acres
(Yes or No)
yes
NONE
Pre-Development Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
7.785 lb/year
lb/year
2.440
0.417
Ib/acre/year
Ib/acre/year1.329
Post-Development Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
37.216 lb/year
lb/year
11.667
1.217
Ib/acre/year
Ib/acre/year3.883
Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading Limits
Nitrogen 5.449 lb/year 1.708 Ib/acre/year
Phosphorous 1.329 lb/year 0.417 Ib/acre/year
Note: If Redevelopment Site, limits are based on 30% reduction in Nitrogen and pre-development loading for Phosphorous
Post-BMP Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading
Nitrogen 37.216
Phosphorous 3.883
Unless project is a redevelopment site,post Nitrogen loading is subj
or duplex residential and 10 Ibs/acre/year forall other projects
lb/year
lb/year
?ct to 6 Ibs/ac
11.667 Ib/acre/year
Ib/acre/year
hold for single-family
1.217
re/year thres
Nutrient Buy-Down Summary
Nitrogen =31.767
Phosphorous =2.554
lb/year
lb/year
9.958
0.801
Ib/acre/year
Ib/acre/year
NCEEP Offset Payment Schedule
Nitrogen =$12.21 per lb.
Phosphorous =$349.62 per lb.
Buydown Calculations
Nitroqen
$11,636.26
$26,787.57
= [($ /lb) (# of Ib/yr) (30 yrs)
Total Nitrogen Buydown
Phosphorous
= [($ /lb) (# of Ib/yr) (30 yrs)
Total Phosphorus Buydown
Total Nutrient Offset Mitigation Payment =$38,423.82
(Note:Mitigation Payment is the sum of the Nitrogen and Phosphorous fees)
P.0. Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227 Rich@MogMit.com
June 3, 2016
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate
Prepared by
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Oakwood Properties, LLC
Station Square Suite 10
Rocky Mount, NC, 27804
Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank Parcel ID: DWQ Project # 2013-0184
Nutrient Offset Credits Purchased: 953.25 (lbs -N)
8 digit-HUC: 03020101
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
You have elected to fulfill your permitted nutrient mitigation requirements for the NCDOR (793 Country Club
Road) Project by paying into the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank.
This Bank has received full payment towards the Nitrogen offset requirement for the above referenced project.
This project is located in the jurisdiction of the City of Rocky Mount which is required to implement stormwater
management requirements as part of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy. The City of Rocky Mount must review
and approve developers’ stormwater management plans which are to include options to offset nutrients loads
occurring at the development site. Payment into a private mitigation bank is acceptable per this nutrient strategy
rule . The City of Rocky Mount specified and verified the amount of the nutrient offset necessary for approval of
the stormwater permit as 953.25 lbs of nitrogen and 76.47 lbs of phosphorous. As no Phosphorus credits are
available through the Tar River Headwaters Mitigation Bank at this time, those credits will need to be purchased
elsewhere in orde r to fully satisfy your mitigation requirements.
You must also comply with any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity including SL 2009-337, An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation Banks. This payment
into the Bank is not transferable. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rich
Mogensen at (704) 576 – 1111.
Sincerely,
Rich Mogensen, President
cc: DWQ -Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset Bank Coordinator
Appendix B
Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Information
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS &
WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
02-26-16
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES
George S. Millar, Jr.
PO Box 8619
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Discharge from broken sewer service at 1265 Independence Drive
Dear Mr. Millar:
On February 9, 2016, personnel of this office inspected property located at the above address in Rocky
Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater
System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal discharge from a broken sanitary sewer service
located behind the building at 1265 Independence Drive, thereby at a location adjacent to a waterway that
enters into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System.
As such, this letter serves as official notification that you are in violation of Section 10 Article V of the
City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances (Illegal Discharges into the Stormwater System). You are
responsible for an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System.
The violations that were found are:
City Ord. No. 10-215(a) was violated by causing or allowing the discharge, emission, disposal, pouring, or
pumping directly or indirectly to any stormwater conveyance, the waters of the state, or upon the land in
such proximity to the same (such that the substance is likely to reach a stormwater conveyance or the
waters of the state), any fluid, solid, gas, or other substance, other than stormwater.
City Ord. No. 10-215(c) was violated by the storage or disposal of polluting substances, which may be
harmful to biological life, in or near the stormwater system or at a location exposed to wind or rain, which
could transport the substances to the stormwater system.
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
The following corrective actions are necessary to remedy the violation(s) for which this Notice was sent:
• Repair the broken sanitary sewer service line and remove any soil and trash from the adjacent
areas that have been affected by this illegal discharge.
The corrective actions noted above must be complete within 7 days from receipt of this notice. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the property to ensure that corrective measures taken are sufficient to
remedy the noted violations prior to the expiration of the compliance period by coordinating with the
City of Rocky Mount inspections department and the City Stormwater Engineer.
Please be advised that if you fail to respond to this notice or if these violations are not corrected by the
end of the compliance period as noted above, the City of Rocky Mount may initiate legal action against
you pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216. That action could be the assessment of a civil penalty and the
amount may be up to $1,000 per day for each day of each violation. The penalty may be assessed from the
date of your receipt of this Notice of Violation. Additionally, pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216(d),
criminal charges may be brought by the City which could include additional fines and/or imprisonment
of up to thirty (30) days. If these violations are corrected within the time period specified for compliance
no further legal action will be pursued.
We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same
time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances.
Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should
you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact
me at (252) 972-1340.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Perry, PE, CPESC
Stormwater Engineer
Department of Public Works & Water Resources
cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
~ .
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2 , arid tt Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delive~s·desired.
• Print your name and addr~'On the reverse
so that we can return the~card. ti you.
• Attach this card to the-back o)tl'i~Ul1ailp[_ece,
or on the front if space permits,:· • ~ ~· .~··
1. Article Addressed to:
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3Jfc;~~ ~ss Mail ~
D Registered Jil Receipt for MerchandlSiD
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D .
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) DYes
2. ' 7008 1140 0004 2624 3987
PS Form 3811 , February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1 02595-02-M-1540
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS &
WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
11-17-15
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES
Crayton Edgecombe Ventures, LLC
Attn: Mr. Walt Crayton
2300 Center Avenue Suite 1
New Bern, NC 28562
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Discharge of Stucco/Paint Substance into Storm Drain System at 1129 and 1109-1115 N Fairview
Road
Dear Mr. Crayton:
On November 17, 2015, personnel of this office inspected property located at the above address in Rocky
Mount, North Carolina to determine if an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater
System had occurred. The inspection revealed the illegal dumping of a stucco/paint type material into the
parking lot storm drain inlets, and thereby at a location that would enter into the City of Rocky Mount
Stormwater System.
As such, this letter serves as official notification that you are in violation of Section 10 Article V of the
City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances (Illegal Discharges into the Stormwater System). You are
responsible for an illicit discharge into the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater System.
The violations that were found are:
City Ord. No. 10-215(a) was violated by causing or allowing the discharge, emission, disposal, pouring, or
pumping directly or indirectly to any stormwater conveyance, the waters of the state, or upon the land in
such proximity to the same (such that the substance is likely to reach a stormwater conveyance or the
waters of the state), any fluid, solid, gas, or other substance, other than stormwater.
City Ord. No. 10-215(c) was violated by the storage or disposal of polluting substances, which may be
harmful to biological life, in or near the stormwater system or at a location exposed to wind or rain, which
could transport the substances to the stormwater system.
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
The following corrective actions are necessary to remedy the violation(s) for which this Notice was sent:
• Remove and properly dispose of all stucco/paint like material and liquid in and around the
drainage basins and storm drain pipe network in the parking lot.
The corrective actions noted above must be complete within 1 day from receipt of this notice. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the property to ensure that corrective measures taken are sufficient to
remedy the noted violations prior to the expiration of the compliance period by coordinating with the
City Stormwater Engineer.
Please be advised that if you fail to respond to this notice or if these violations are not corrected by the
end of the compliance period as noted above, the City of Rocky Mount may initiate legal action against
you pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216. That action could be the assessment of a civil penalty and the
amount may be up to $1,000 per day for each day of each violation. The penalty may be assessed from the
date of your receipt of this Notice of Violation. Additionally, pursuant to City Ord. No. 10-216(d),
criminal charges may be brought by the City which could include additional fines and/or imprisonment
of up to thirty (30) days. If these violations are corrected within the time period specified for compliance
no further legal action will be pursued.
We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same
time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances.
Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should
you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact
me at (252) 972-1340.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Perry, PE, CPESC
Stormwater Engineer
Department of Public Works & Water Resources
Enclosure: On-site photographs
cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources
Ed White, Streets and Stormwater Superintendent, Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
1
Donald Perry
From:Walt Crayton <wcrayton@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:47 AM
To:Carl Smith
Cc:Donald Perry
Subject:Re: Fairview Rd. Clean-up Email #1
Carl and Donald,
Thank you both for your tremendous response to this situation, again I am deeply sorry that these stucco guys did
this. Thank you again so very much for everything, and for Carl you and your guys getting out there last night ahead of
these rains. I truly appreciate it.
Please let me know should either of you need anything further. Take care.
‐Walt Crayton
Walt F. Crayton, Jr.
Crayton Commercial, LLC
Shopping Center Development
2300 Center Avenue, Suite One
New Bern, NC 28562
252-637-4000 (office)
252-670-4503 (mobile)
252-637-4043 (fax)
wcrayton@gmail.com
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.craytoncommercial.com
SPECIALIZING IN RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER DEVELOPMENT, RE‐DEVELOPMENT, LEASING & MANAGEMENT
THROUGHOUT THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
“WHEN THE DEAL’S WORTH MAKIN’, STICK WITH CRAYTON!”
2
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Carl Smith <CSmith@eastern‐environmental.com> wrote:
Good morning Donald,
Attached is the summary letter and I will be sending pictures in this and additional emails for the clean‐up on
Fairview Rd. rocky Mount. Call with questions, also I will get with you later to return the pipe plug.
Cordially,
Carl Smith
Carl Smith / CFO
(252)903‐9084 Cell
(252)443‐2224 Office
(252)972‐9940 Fax
P.O. Box 4030
518 S. Pearl St.
Rocky Mount NC, 27803
http://www.spillcontractornc.com/
Whatever It Takes!
This electronic communication (including attachments) contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the named
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received
this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 252-443-2224 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.
Eastern Environmental Management, LLC
P.O. Box 4030
Rocky Mount, NC 27803
Office (252) 443-2224 (24 Hrs.)
Fax (252) 972-9940
www.eastern-environmental.com
March 25, 2008
City of Rocky Mount
Attn: Mr. Donald Perry
331 South Franklin Street
PO Box 1180
Rocky Mount, NC 27802-1180
Dear Mr. Perry,
Eastern Environmental Management was called out on Tuesday November 17, 2015
by Mr. Walt Crayton. Apparently some contractors doing some stucco repair had
improperly clean off their tools into (2) storm drains at 1129 N Fairview Rd, Rocky
Mount. EEM responded by vacuuming both storm drains out and then flushing both
storm drains with approximately 50 gallons of water per storm drain. EEM also brushed
off the tops of each storm grate and lightly brushed the side walls from any residue.
EEM brought back approximately 125 gallons of non-haz material for disposal. I have
attached some pictures
Sincerely,
Carl Smith
Carl Smith - CEO
Partner
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS &
WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
06-24-16
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
OF SECTION 10 ARTICLE V OF THE
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT CODE OF ORDINANCES
Mr. Clyde Avent
116 Justin Court
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Car parked on street at 109 Justin Court- leaking oil
Dear Mr. Avent:
It has come to our attention that there may be a violation of the City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Illicit
Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Article 5 of the Code of Ordinances) in the street
along the curb at 109 Justin Court. On June 01, 2016 personnel of this office inspected a car parked on
the street located at the above address. The inspection revealed a recent accumulating oil leak as a result
of a car parked on the street for an extended period of time. (reference enclosed report & pictures).
This letter is being sent to you in lieu of a formal Notice of Violation due to the fact that the noted
violation does not pose an immediate threat to life, property, or the environment. However, the violation
must be corrected by July 15, 2016 to avoid issuance of a Notice of Violation. Specifically, the following
items must be addressed to the city’s satisfaction prior to the compliance deadline:
• As much as possible, remove oil like substance from street surface with absorbent material. Do
NOT use any liquid cleaning substance that may enter into the storm drain.
• Do not allow any additional oil to leak onto street surface.
I encourage you to contact me as soon as possible to discuss the above corrective actions, and again for a
follow up inspection prior to the deadline. Should the violations remain on or after the above deadline, a
Notice of Violation may be issued, carrying possible civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day per violation
from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties.
We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same
time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Code of Ordinances.
Copies of the relevant ordinances may be examined at this office or be sent to you upon request. Should
you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Code of Ordinances, please contact
me at (252) 972-1340.
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
Sincerely,
Donald M. Perry, PE
Stormwater Engineer
Department of Public Works & Water Resources
cc: Jonathan Boone, PE, Director, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water Resources
Mike Tolson, PE, Asst. Director & Stormwater Manager, CRM Dept. of Public Works & Water
Resources
Enclosure\
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1520 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
Email: stormwater@rockymountnc.gov
Illicit Discharge Reporting Form
Today’s Date: 06/01/2016
Contact Name: Contact Phone Number:
Responsible Party: Address: 108 Justin Ct. Rocky Mount, NC.
Date of Last Rain Event: 05/30/2016 Estimated amount: .25 inch
Date of Next Chance of Rain: 06/02/2016
Has Discharge Entered Storm Drainage System? No
Location Of Discharge: 109 Justin Ct. Rocky Mount, NC.
Description of Discharge? Color Odor Oily Garbage Oily
Where Was Discharge? Open Ditch Stream Other: Asphalt Road
Was Discharge Observed? No Was a Photo Taken? Yes (2)
Additional Information:
Follow Up:
Inspector: Thomas Maready
UNITED STATE~-j~VICE
-NC.275
30JJN ':16
o ... .i.\ .J
I II
• .'.":Do.Jt\.\d Pe tf '1 ~ E
E 1..,\ (,.; ,.\ E'fl.i .,~ J>ef[,
City of Rocky Mount PW I WR
331 S. Franklin Street
P.O. Box 1180
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
First~Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid ,
USPS
Permit No. G-10
••
' :-11808i) 111111,m •H, 1lm,1 11hi 111 1u11 11JH1 11 11JIiI•11 J JI, ,,1 u, u,.
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr. c. \'-\de A./t"T
\ \ U, :J usf,· J C Ott;\
fo~~rJC
~'7&f
7008 1140 0004 2624 4014
D. Is delivery address different from Item
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3:.Pr1M ]Ill& Q>J.~Certm6ci-Fji ~~~""""'-.i.'•Ma~U:...._~~..,,,..,_ o Registered <B{letuffi Receiot tor M~
D Insured Mail D C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS &
WATER RESOURCES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1340 • Fax (252) 972-1173 • Website: publicworks.rockymountnc.gov
January 22, 2016
Thompson Nursery, Inc.
PO Box 4128
Rocky Mount, NC 27803
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Prohibited lawn maintenance activities at the former Poyner & Spruill, LLP occupied building
130 S Franklin Street
Rocky Mount, NC 27803
Dear Sir or Madam:
As you may be aware, the City of Rocky Mount is proactive in the enforcement of its Stormwater Management
Program. As part of this effort, we have solicited the assistance of City of Rocky Mount employees, contractors,
landscapers, and the general public in identifying possible violations of City ordinances dealing with the stormwater
system.
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, a City of Rocky Mount employee observed a Thompson Nursery employee
disposing/blowing leaves/grass clippings onto the street adjacent to 130 S Franklin Street Bank as part of the lawn
maintenance operation. Please be aware that Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky Mount Code of Ordinances
states the following regarding discharges to the stormwater system:
a. For first time offenders, if the quantity of the discharge is equal to or less than five (5) gallons
and consists of domestic or household products in quantities considered ordinary for household
purposes, said person shall be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed one hundred dollars
($100.00) per violation or per day for any continuing violation, and if the quantity of the
discharge is greater than five (5) gallons or contains non-domestic substances, including but not
limited to process waste water, or if said person cannot provide clear and convincing evidence of
the volume and nature of the substance discharged, said person shall be assessed a civil penalty
not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per violation or per day for any continuing
violation;
b. For repeat offenders, the amount of the penalty shall be double the amount assessed for the
previous penalty, not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation or per day for any
continuing violation;
In the past, Thompson Nursery, Inc. has been found to be in violation of Section 10-216 (b) 1 of the City of Rocky
Mount Code of Ordinances and was notified of the violation (see enclosed); thereby, qualifying as a repeat offender.
As a result of the repeat violation, a civil penalty of $50.00 is being accessed for this most recent incident. The
assessment amount is based on guidelines in City Ord Sec 10-216.
Accordingly, please find attached the invoice for the penalty amount. Per City Ord Section 10-216, once served with this
written demand for payment, you have thirty (30) days to pay. After thirty (30) days, a civil action may be filed in the
name of the city in the appropriate division of the general court of justice in Nash County in order to recover the civil
penalty portion.
331 South Franklin Street • Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone (252) 972-1121 • Fax (252) 972-1176 • Website: www.ci.rocky-mount.nc.us
In the future, to avoid additional enforcement actions, please ensure that any leaves, pine straw, grass clippings
and debris are cleaned from the street as soon as possible after maintenance is performed, and are not disposed of
in the storm drainage system.
I look forward to resolution of this matter and we would appreciate your assistance in ensuring that the City’s
drainage ways are kept clear of unnecessary debris. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at the number below.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Perry, PE
Stormwater Engineer
t: 252/972-1340
email: donald.perry@rockymountnc.gov
Enclosures: Previous Notice
Cc: Enforcement File
Jonathan Boone, PE - Director of Public Works & Water Resources
Appendix C
BMP Retrofit Locations and Information
Appendix D
Public Education and Outreach Information
Activity Point Value #Done Last Yr Points Cost #Planned Next Points Anticipated
(10/15 - 9/16)Yr (10/16 - 9/17)Anticipated Cost
(Out of Pocket)
1 Demonstration Sites (for BMPs)4 each
2 Local Newspaper Article 2 each
3 Technical Workshop (1st year; 2 required)4 each
4 Environmental Contest / Field Day 4 each
5 Arrange Speakers for Civic Organizations 1 each 21 21 10 10
6 Clean Water Proclamation, with Newspaper Article 2 1 2
7 Web Page / Web Site Links 2 / year 1 2 1 2
8 Pet Waste Ordinance 5 / year
9 Factsheets/Brochures/Flyers/Enviro freebies (public places)2 / year 2 2 100 1 2 500
10 Utility Bill Inserts or Messages on Bills 3 / year
11 Close-out Packages / Info for New Homeowners 3 / year
12 Storm Drain Marking (24 minimum per year)2 / year 25 2
13 Sponsor new/expand Adopt-A-(Street-or-Stream) Program 4 / year 6 4 1 4
14 Recognition Program (environmentally friendly participants)1 / year
15 Toll Free Environmental Hotline (1-800 or Local)3 / year 1 3 1 3
16 VWIN Monitoring Force (Water Quality Reporting)6 / year
17 Other Water Quality Reporting Program 3 / year
18 Major Media Advertising 6 / year 1 6 4310 1 6 4500
19 Local Access or Radio Spots 3 / year 1 3 1500
38 34
Submitted By: Donald M. Perry Title:
Date:
Assistant City Engineer - Water Resources
8/4/2017
Total Points Reported:Total Points Planned:
Please attach copies of articles, flyers, photographs, etc. documenting your activities, labeled for each type of activity.
Note: Ongoing activities will continue to receive the education points for each year that they are in effect.
Note: If your locality has put together an exceptional effort for any of the above activities, you may be entitled to additional
points for that activity. Please attach a description of the activity, a merit rationale, and a point proposal.
Appendix S.
Public Education Action Report and Plan:
Public Education Action Report and Plan
Jurisdiction: City of Rocky Mount Date Submitted:
Detail of Reported Activities (10/15-09/16)
Brief Description of Activity Date Cost Comments/
Presentations:Attachments
City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader's Meeting, >20 2/11/2016
Edgecombe County Cpmmissioner's Meeting >25 4/4/2016
Community Watch Group-Nashville, 15 8/11/2016
City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader's Meeting, 15 9/8/2016
Rotary Club Meeting 9/15/2016
Nash Rocky Mount Early College High School Avid Classes, 62 10/22/16, 10/26/15
Benvenue Elementary School, 412
11/03/15, 11/05/15,
11/06/15
G.W. Carver Elementary School, 2 12/17/2015
Free Will Baptist Children's Home, 30 3/31/2016
Benvenue Elementary School Career Day, 725 4/20/2016
Martin Millennium Academy Earth Day, 700 4/22/2016
TSC Summer Enrichment Camp, 35 7/6/2017
Area-L AHEC Camp P.U.S.H., 39 7/20/2016
Participated in 8 Community Events and Festivals, >12000 10/2014-09/2015
Detail of Planned Activities
Brief Description of Activity Date Anticipated Comments/
Planned Cost Attachments
Adopt-A-Stream Ongoing 2,000.00$
Stormwater Hotline Ongoing -$
Media Advertising & Radio Campaign (CWEP)Ongoing 5,000.00$
Public Presentations Ongoing -$
Storm Drain Marking Ongoing 2,500.00$
Technical Workshop for Staff Summer/Fall 2017 500.00$
Civic Group
Civic Group
Targeted Audience
Civic Group
Civic Group
Civic Group
Civic Groups/General Public
All, Publicized with all outreach material
Students & Staff
Students & Staff
Students & Staff
Students & Staff
Students & Staff
Citizens of Rocky Mount; Nash & Edgecombe Counties
Schools/Civic Groups/General Public
Civic Groups/General Public
Operational Supervisors
Students & Staff
Camp Participants and Staff
Camp Participants and Staff
General Public
Targeted Audience
Stormwater Prevention Education
From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, Keep America Beautiful Program has
made 43 presentations to school groups, neighborhood associations, civic clubs, and
public officials. Stormwater prevention literature and incentives (i.e. “Clean Water
Begins with You and Me” Brochure, Mutt Mitt, and “No Grease Down the Drain!” Lid)
were disseminated and also showcased on the KAB exhibit display at community
festivals and events.
Specific Keep America Beautiful Program Accomplishments
• Collaborative Partnerships: The Keep America Beautiful Program has
continued to maintain and build upon the effective collaboration of
local government agencies, schools, and businesses as well as faith
and grass-root organizations.
• Public Education/Outreach: The Keep America Beautiful Program
accomplishments for stormwater prevention included:
o Participating in 8 community festivals and events (Rocky Mount
Fair, Nash County Energy/Safety Expo, International Festival of
Cultures, City of Rocky Mount Arbor Day Tree Giveaway, City of
Rocky Mount Public Works Week, Cummins Rocky Mount Engine
Plant Environmental Day, Rock the Mount, and Villa Place
Community Festival, which reached an audience of over 12,000
individuals.
o Presentations were done at the following schools and camp
programs:
Nash Rocky Mount Early College High School Avid
Classes (October 22 and 26, 2015– 60 students and 2
teachers)
Benvenue Elementary School (November 3, 5, and 6,
2015 – 312 students and 10 staff)
G.W. Carver Elementary School (December 17, 2015 – 2
staff)
Free Will Baptist Children’s Home (March 31, 2016 – 20
students and 10 staff)
Benvenue Elementary School Career Day (April 20, 2016
– 700 students and more than 25 staff)
Martin Millennium Academy Earth Day (April 22, 2016 –
650 students and 50 staff)
TSC Summer Enrichment Camp (July 6, 2016 – 35 camp
participants and 4 staff)
Area-L AHEC Camp P.U.S.H. (July 20, 2016 – 60 camp
participants and 6 staff)
o In addition, presentations were made to the following
community groups:
City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader’s Meeting
(February 11, 2016 – more than 20 community
members)
Edgecombe County Commissioners’ Meeting (April 4,
2016 – more than 25 people)
Community Watch Group – Nashville (August 11, 2016 –
15 people)
City of Rocky Mount Neighborhood Leader’s Meeting
(September 8, 2016 – 22 community members)
Rotary Club Meeting - Tarboro (September 15, 2016 –
more than people)
KAB Coordinator distributed stormwater prevention information to over
1,946 students/staff and 107 adults.
Fiscal Year 2015 – 2016
Annual Report
Mike Schlegel
Triangle J Council of Governments
4307 Emperor Boulevard
Suite 110
Durham, NC 27703
Phone: (919) 558-9342 Fax: (919) 549-9390
mschlegel@tjcog.org
This Annual Report describes Fiscal Year 2015-2016 (FY16) activities of the
North Carolina Clean Water Education Partnership (CWEP).
Annual Reports, detailed campaign-specific summaries, outreach materials, and other
resources are available online at http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 2 -
Contents
CWEP FY16 Partners and Cost Shares ....................................................................................3
CWEP FY16 Program Overview ..............................................................................................4
CWEP FY16 Summer Cinema Pre-Show Campaign Summary ...............................................5
CWEP FY16 Fall Online Video Pilot Campaign Summary .......................................................7
CWEP FY16 Fall Social Media Campaign Summary ..............................................................10
CWEP FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign Summary .........................................................12
CWEP FY16 Spring Social Media Campaign Summary .........................................................16
CWEP FY16 Website Summary.............................................................................................17
CWEP FY16 Print Outreach ..................................................................................................18
CWEP FY16 Outreach Booth ................................................................................................19
CWEP FY16 Giveaways .........................................................................................................20
A Note about Definitions
Media campaigns are described by special statistics and terminology, which may not be
familiar to the reader. Definitions are therefore included in this report, which were
paraphrased from the following:
Surmanek, Jim. Advertising Media A to Z: The Definitive Resource for
Media Planning, Buying, and Research. New York, McGraw-Hill. 2003.
Webopedia. http://www.webopedia.com. August 10, 2006.
Online links to resources for media definitions can also be found on any of CWEP’s
Outreach web pages (http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/index.php).
A Note about Television Markets and Statistics
Media buyers use specialized compilations of market data, called “books,” to target spots to
specific demographic populations and generate post-campaign statistics. Vendors of ratings
information (usually Nielsen for TV) define a market based on population centers (e.g., the
New Bern market).
The TV station broadcast areas are usually not coterminous with these market regions. This
creates so-called “fringe” markets (usually smaller towns located outside an urban area),
whose broadcast stations may be listed in more than one market book. For example, the City
of Rocky Mount falls into both the Raleigh-Durham and the New Bern markets. As a result,
ratings for Rocky Mount show up in both the Raleigh-Durham and the New Bern books. The
values will differ between books; media sales staff typically use the book with the higher
ratings for that particular buy.
Comparing campaigns over time can be problematic, because different media use different
definitions, because the way that a given book defines its market may change, and because
the way that campaign statistics are presented by the vendor may vary. Despite these
challenges, CWEP’s media buying and campaign analyses continue to become more
sophisticated with time.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 3 -
CWEP FY16 Partners and Cost Shares
CWEP local government partners share the costs of the program. Each of the partners’ shares is the
sum of a base cost ($2,000 for FY16) and a proportionate cost. Each partner’s proportionate cost is
the product of its population and a per-capita rate ($0.041 per person for FY16; the Steering
Committee continued the discount of the per-capita rate applied in FY10 due to the ongoing
recession). Partner population estimates are the latest official estimates available from the NC State
Demographics unit at the time that cost shares are calculated (FY16 used 2013 certified estimates).
Population*Cost Share Population*Cost Share
Town of Apex 2,5 40,918 $3,678 Johnston County 1 126,084 $7,169
Town of Benson 2 3,377 $2,138 City of Kinston 1 21,368 $2,876
Town of Butner 2 7,728 $2,317 Town of Knightdale 2 12,692 $2,520
Town of Carrboro 2,5 20,510 $2,841 Town of Morrisville 2,5 20,753 $2,851
Town of Cary 1,2,5 144,671 $7,932 Nash County 2,4 40,920 $3,678
Town of Chapel Hill*,2,5 51,153 $4,097 City of New Bern 1 29,889 $3,225
Chatham County 2,5 52,965 $4,172 Orange County 1,2,5 54,445 $4,232
Town of Clayton 2 17,174 $2,704 City of Oxford 4 8,489 $2,348
City of Creedmoor 2 4,289 $2,176 Town of Pittsboro 5 4,133 $2,169
City of Durham 1,3,5 241,174 $11,888 City of Raleigh 1,3 416,221 $19,065
Durham County 1,5 40,385 $3,656 City of Rocky Mount 2,4 56,334 $4,310
Town of Fuquay-Varina 2 19,802 $2,812 City of Roxboro 2 8,187 $2,336
Town of Garner 1,2 27,035 $3,108 Town of Smithfield 1 11,027 $2,452
City of Goldsboro 1,2 35,489 $3,455 Town of Spring Lake*,2 7,111 $2,292
City of Havelock 1 20,821 $2,854 Town of Tarboro 4 11,285 $2,463
Town of Hillsborough 2 6,395 $2,262 Town of Wake Forest 2 32,360 $3,327
Town of Holly Springs 2 27,637 $3,133 Wayne County 1,2 81,855 $5,356
Town of Hope Mills 2 15,915 $2,653 Town of Wendell 2 6,146 $2,252
Town of Zebulon 2 4,541 $2,186
1. Subject to Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Regulations.
2. Subject to NPDES Phase II Stormwater Regulations.
3. Subject to NPDES Phase I Stormwater Regulations.
4. Subject to Tar-Pamlico River Basin Nutrient Management Regulations.
5. Subject to Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Regulations.
*Populations have been adjusted for group quarters covered by another state stormwater permit
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 4 -
CWEP FY16 Program Overview
The CWEP Steering Committee (consisting representatives from each local government
partner) established CWEP FY16 program cost shares and budget in January 2015.
FY16 was an exciting year for CWEP, as the program began a move into digital -first
outreach markets with a primary focus on online video and social media campaigns.
There is a monumental shift underway in how people access and consume media.
Whereas traditional broadcast and cable television has been the mainstay for many years,
more and more people are using mobile devices and streaming platforms to access
programming. On the Internet, video content is increasingly popular for accessing
targeted video clips. Traditional, full-length television programs are still very popular, but
more people are accessing them through non-traditional means. As such, in FY16, CWEP
focused on online video pre-roll advertising, mobile television platforms and social media
campaigns. Developing jurisdictional statistics from digital platforms has presented a new
challenge this year because we now have more precise and accurate information abo ut
actual impressions (rather than broad estimates based on limited television samples), but
we’ve had to develop new methods for assigning impressions to the jurisdictional-level.
CWEP continued working with Greenroom Communications and developed a new 30-
second stand-alone version of our Sodfather grass clippings spot as well as hosted an
online lawn-care giveaway campaign on the CWEP Facebook page. CWEP also hosted a
website providing information to the public on stormwater issues and provided a booth
for CWEP partners to take to local events to educate the public face-to-face. These
activities are described in greater detail in the remainder of this report .
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 5 -
CWEP FY16 Summer Cinema
Pre-Show Campaign Summary
Introduction
CWEP ran DENR’s Johnny Fishpatrick spot in CWEP area movie theaters in Summer 2015.
Two cinema networks or “circuits,” National CineMedia and Screenvision, were
purchased to maximize coverage of CWEP Partner jurisdictional areas. This arrangement
with two vendors began in FY13 and improves coverage of our member jurisdictions with
cinema outreach.
Spot
The 30-second Johnny Fishpatrick spot from the NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources was run in all theaters. This spot conveys general messages about
sources of stormwater pollution and the public’s role in preventing it in a family -friendly
way.
Target Audience
Movie theaters are bought in batches; spots and campaigns cannot be targeted to
individual movies or demographics.
Campaign Locations and Performance
Spots were shown in numerous movie theaters in the CWEP partner area on two circuits,
National CineMedia and Screenvision. Below is a list of each circuit’s theaters and their
locations. Both circuits ran the spot 7/31/2015 - 8/13/2015. Cinema flights usually start
on Fridays and end on Thursdays.
An error was made in the initial booking and Kinston’s cinema was inadvertently omitted
from the NCM run. NCM ran a series of makegoods 9/4/2015 - 9/17/2015, which included
additional cinemas and are reported separately below.
Please report the statistics for the theater(s) closest to or within your jurisdiction.
Impressions represent how many times the spot was viewed. The impression count is
based on total views and may include some duplicated audience members if moviegoers
attended more than one movie during the campaign.
Impressions were estimated by the vendor based on the number of weeks the spot ran in
the theater and an estimated average number of viewers per screen per week for the
time of year or based on the previous year’s ticket sales. National CineMedia ran our ads
in their lobbies as well, so we assumed that each person saw the spot once in their
theaters’ lobbies and once in the theaters.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 6 -
National CineMedia Circuit – Primary Run
Theatre Location # of Big
Screens
# of
Spots
Est. Big
Screen
Impressions
Est. Lobby
Impressions
Est. Total
Impressions
Beaver Creek Stadium 12 Apex 12 672 10,135 3,686 13,821
Brier Creek Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 9,490 3,451 12,941
Crossroads Stadium 20 Cary 20 1,120 16,667 6,061 22,728
North Hills Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 13,581 4,938 18,519
Premiere Theatre 12 Goldsboro 12 672 7,267 2,642 9,909
Premiere Theatre 14 Rocky Mount 14 784 6,681 2,429 9,110
Wakefield 12 Raleigh 12 672 13,295 4,835 18,130
White Oak Stadium 14 Garner 14 784 13,143 4,779 17,922
Timberlyne 6 Chapel Hill 6 336 3,513 n/a 3,513
Totals 6,608 93,772 32,821 126,593
National CineMedia Circuit – Makegood Run
Theatre Location # of Big
Screens
# of
Spots
Est. Big
Screen
Impressions
Est. Lobby
Impressions
Est. Total
Impressions
Brier Creek Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 3,947 1,435 5,382
North Hills Stadium 14 Raleigh 14 784 5,649 2,054 7,703
Premiere Theatre 7 Kinston Kinston 7 392 824 300 1,124
Totals 1,960 10,420 3,789 14,209
ScreenVision Circuit
Theatre Location # of
Screens # of Spots Estimated
Impressions
Lumina Theatre Chapel Hill 5 350 6,540
Phoenix 10 on the Plaza Durham 10 700 14,005
Southpoint Cinemas Durham 17 1,190 26,630
Millstone 14 Fayetteville 14 980 22,860
Marketfair 15 Fayetteville 15 1,050 23,970
Havelock Cinema I-VI Havelock 6 420 6,900
Stone Theaters Park West 14 Morrisville 14 980 24,650
Carmike Raleigh 15 Raleigh 15 1050 20,780
Carmike Wilson 10 Wilson 10 700 14,020
Totals 7,420 160,355
Campaign Costs and Overall Performance
Total cost: $11,000
Total spots: 15,988
Total impressions: 301,157
Average per-spot cost: $0. 688
Average per-impression cost: $0.0365
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 7 -
CWEP FY16 Fall Online Video Pilot Campaign Summary
Introduction
CWEP ran an online video pre-roll campaign in Fall 2015 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015-
2016 stormwater public outreach program. Video pre-roll is an advertising spot that is
shown before an online video clip. A total of $8,090.00 was spent by the Partnership on
the Fall 2015 video online pre-roll pilot campaign.
Spots
One 15-second video pre-roll spot (advertisement) ran, CWEP’s 2015 “Sodfather” teaser
spot. The short 15-second teaser spot and an accompanying banner ad were intended to
entice viewers to click through to watch the full 2-minute version of the Sodfather video
and participate in the Sodfather Challenge by pledging to follow the Sodfather’s advice to
“mow high and let it lie.” The full video and Sodfather pledge were hosted on CWEP’s
Facebook page.
Campaign
The spot ran across Time Warner Cable’s Online Audience Network in the Raleigh,
Greenville and Wilmington markets to the zip codes within CWEP Partner jurisdictions. It
was run as both a run-of-network spot and targeted spot from September 17 to
September 29, 2015.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 8 -
The campaign targeted sites and programs related to home and yard care, e.g., Southern
Living, as well as general family entertainment.
Target Audience
The audience targeted for this campaign was adults aged 35+ who own their own homes,
are educated and enjoy yard work and gardening. Research shows that this is the
demographic most likely to do their own yard care (rather than hiring a service) and
because our Sodfather spot was designed to communicate grass clipping care concepts to
this demographic.
Campaign Performance
Campaign performance statistics are reported here for the media market’s population as
a whole, not for the target demographic. This is important to note because campaigns
are targeted to reach a particular demographic, which is a smaller base, so the statistics
describing campaign efficiency are generally higher and gross impression count is lower
for the target audience than for the population as a whole. For local government and/or
regulatory reporting purposes, figures on the population as a whole are more readily
understood and compared.
The Fall 2015 online video pre-roll pilot campaign had 347,105 total video plays with a
76.95% completion rate. Because the spot was delivered online, these are verified actual
video plays rather than estimates generated from a small sample as is the case with
traditional television statistics. The jurisdictional values presented below are estimates
that were derived by dividing the entire campaign impressions by the proportion of the
target population within each jurisdiction. That is to say, the spot was designed t o be
delivered proportionally across the CWEP Partner jurisdictions.
Definitions
Impressions: How many times the video spot was actually played in the market by
members of the population. (Spots may have been seen more than once by the same
person; the impression count is based on total actual views regardless of duplication
among members of the audience.) Note that the population counts used by media
outlets differ from those used by CWEP, so actual impression counts may differ
somewhat from those shown for jurisdictions to report on the following page.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 9 -
Estimated Figures by Jurisdiction for CWEP Partners to Report
JURISDICTION FY16 POPULATION IMPRESSIONS
Town of Apex 40,918 8,842
Town of Benson 3,377 730
Town of Butner 7,728 1,670
Town of Carrboro 20,510 4,432
Town of Cary 144,671 31,261
Town of Chapel Hill 51,153 11,053
Chatham County 52,965 11,445
Town of Clayton 17,174 3,711
City of Creedmoor 4,289 927
City of Durham 241,174 52,114
Durham County 40,385 8,727
Town of Fuquay-Varina 19,802 4,279
Town of Garner 27,035 5,842
City of Goldsboro 35,489 7,669
City of Havelock 20,821 4,499
Town of Hillsborough 6,395 1,382
Town of Holly Springs 27,637 5,972
Town of Hope Mills 15,915 3,439
Johnston County 126,084 27,245
City of Kinston 21,368 4,617
Town of Knightdale 12,692 2,743
Town of Morrisville 20,753 4,484
Nash County 40,920 8,842
City of New Bern 29,889 6,459
Orange County 54,445 11,765
City of Oxford 8,489 1,834
Town of Pittsboro 4,133 893
City of Raleigh 416,221 89,940
City of Rocky Mount 56,334 12,173
City of Roxboro 8,187 1,769
Town of Smithfield 11,027 2,383
Town of Spring Lake 7,111 1,537
Town of Tarboro 11,285 2,439
Town of Wake Forest 32,360 6,993
Wayne County 81,855 17,688
Town of Wendell 6,146 1,328
Town of Zebulon 4,541 981
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 10 -
CWEP FY16 Fall Social Media Campaign Summary
Introduction
CWEP embarked on another program first in FY16 with an online social media campaign
in Fall 2015. Working with Greenroom Communication, the full-length Sodfather video
spot was posted on CWEP’s Facebook page along with a Sodfather Challenge to pledge to
follow the Sodfather’s advice to “mow high and let it lie.”
Spot
The full-length CWEP Sodfather spot was used in the posts as well as behind the scenes
photos. This Sodfather spot is a humorous portrayal of a neighbor that takes himself too
seriously ‘The Sodfather’ as he conveys proper ways to manage and dispose of grass
clippings to his neighbors. It is a light-hearted, family-friendly spot with a fun twist at the
end. It was designed to be “sharable” through online social media platforms.
Target Audience
The series of Facebook posts were boosted through a modest advertising buy to NC
viewers ages 25-45.
Campaign Performance
The posts and social media sharing generated over 61,000 online impressions, and the
video had over 12,000 views on Facebook between August 20 and October 3, 2015. In
addition, there was a high level of Facebook post engagement with 505 post clicks, 223
likes, 19 comments and 72 shares, which is outstanding!
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 11 -
The Sodfather Pledge page had 231 visitors and 60 people completed the poll. The CWEP
Partners assisted in the performance for the video and the pledge by posting on their
social channels and websites. There were social media posts and shares from the Town of
Morrisville, Holly Springs, Durham NC Stormwater, and Raleigh Go Green. There were also
blog posts and web updates from Orange County, Knightdale, Chapel Hill, Morrisville,
Hillsborough, and Butner.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 12 -
CWEP FY16 Spring Online Video Campaign Summary
Introduction
Building on the success of the online video pre-roll campaign in the Fall, CWEP conducted
an expanded online media campaign for Spring 2016 as part of its Fiscal Year 2015-2016
stormwater public outreach program. This campaign had three separate components and
featured a new 30-second version of the Sodfather spot based on Partner feedback. The
spring online campaign included video pre-roll across the Time Warner Cable (TWC)
Online Audience Network, 30-second traditional television commercials delivered
through TWC’s TV Anywhere internet-based platforms, and several days of full-screen,
high-impact advertising on TWC’s webmail login pages. A total of $25,200.00 was spent
by the Partnership on the Spring 2016 online video campaign.
Spots
In the Fall 2015 campaign, CWEP featured a 15-second video “teaser” spot intended to
entice viewers to click through to watch the full 2-minute version of the Sodfather video.
Feedback from the Partners was that this 15-second spot did not deliver a succinct
message in and of itself, which makes sense since it was not designed as a stand along
advertisement. Therefore, the Partners worked with Greenroom to develop a new 30 -
second version of the Sodfather video that could be used as a stand -alone advertisement
and deliver a complete message about grass clippings. The 30-second spot is more
versatile, since it can be used as a preview to the full-length 2-minute version or used in
additional venues like movie theaters or traditional television advertising a s a stand-alone
spot. The new 30-second Sodfather spot was featured in the Spring 2016 online video
campaign.
Campaign
Audience Network Pre-Roll: The 30-second spot ran as a video pre-roll advertisement
across Time Warner Cable’s Online Audience Network in the Raleigh, Greenville and
Wilmington markets to the zip codes within CWEP Partner jurisdictions. Video pre-roll is
an advertising spot that is shown before an online video clip and was accompanied by a
static banner advertisement on the page. It was run as both a run-of-network spot and
targeted spot from March 21 to June 12, 2016. Like the Fall 2015 pilot, the pre-roll
campaign targeted sites and programs related to home and yard care, e.g., Southern
Living, as well as general family entertainment.
TV Everywhere: The 30-second Sodfather spot was also used as a stand-alone television
commercial on TWC’s TV Everywhere platform. This new platform is an internet -based
app for mobile phones, tablets and streaming devices. It allows TWC customers to view
regular television program on demand and on-the-go across a wide variety of mobile
devices and set-top streaming boxes. The programing and commercial are traditional,
but the delivery methods are a new technology-based platform.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 13 -
Webmail Take-Over: The third component of the Spring 2016 online video campaign was
a full-page advertisement on TWC’s webmail login page for a 24-hour period, referred to
as a webmail take-over. We ran the webmail take-over several times in the Raleigh and
Wilmington markets during the campaign.
Target Audience
The audience targeted for this campaign was adults aged 35+ who own their own homes,
are educated and enjoy yard work and gardening. Research shows that this is the
demographic most likely to do their own yard care (rather than hiring a service) and
because our Sodfather spot was designed to communicate grass clipping care concepts to
this demographic.
Campaign Performance
Campaign performance statistics are reported here for the media market’s population as
a whole across all three campaign components, not for the target demographic. This is
important to note because campaigns are targeted to reach a particular demographic,
which is a smaller base, so the statistics describing campaign efficiency are generally
higher and gross impression count is lower for the target audience than for the
population as a whole. For local government and/or regulatory reporting purposes,
figures on the population as a whole are more readily understood and compared . More
detailed campaign statistics are available upon request.
The Spring 2016 online video campaign had 898,573 total impressions and engagement of
3,260 click-throughs. Because the spot was delivered online, these are verified actual
video plays rather than estimates generated from a small sample as is the case with
traditional television statistics.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 14 -
The jurisdictional values presented below are estimates that were derived by dividing the
entire campaign impressions by the proportion of the target population within each
jurisdiction, because the campaign was designed to be delivered proportionally across the
CWEP Partner jurisdictions.
Definitions
Impressions: How many times the advertisement or video spot was actually viewed in the
market by members of the population. (Spots may have been seen more than once by
the same person; the impression count is based on total actual views regardless of
duplication among members of the audience.) Note that the population counts used by
media outlets differ from those used by CWEP, so actual impression counts may differ
somewhat from those shown for jurisdictions to report on the following page.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 15 -
Estimated Figures by Jurisdiction for CWEP Partners to Report
JURISDICTION FY16 POPULATION IMPRESSIONS
Town of Apex 40,918 21,237
Town of Benson 3,377 1,753
Town of Butner 7,728 4,011
Town of Carrboro 20,510 10,645
Town of Cary 144,671 75,088
Town of Chapel Hill 51,153 26,550
Chatham County 52,965 27,490
Town of Clayton 17,174 8,914
City of Creedmoor 4,289 2,226
City of Durham 241,174 125,175
Durham County 40,385 20,961
Town of Fuquay-Varina 19,802 10,278
Town of Garner 27,035 14,032
City of Goldsboro 35,489 18,420
City of Havelock 20,821 10,807
Town of Hillsborough 6,395 3,319
Town of Holly Springs 27,637 14,344
Town of Hope Mills 15,915 8,260
Johnston County 126,084 65,440
City of Kinston 21,368 11,090
Town of Knightdale 12,692 6,587
Town of Morrisville 20,753 10,771
Nash County 40,920 21,238
City of New Bern 29,889 15,513
Orange County 54,445 28,258
City of Oxford 8,489 4,406
Town of Pittsboro 4,133 2,145
City of Raleigh 416,221 216,028
City of Rocky Mount 56,334 29,239
City of Roxboro 8,187 4,249
Town of Smithfield 11,027 5,723
Town of Spring Lake 7,111 3,691
Town of Tarboro 11,285 5,857
Town of Wake Forest 32,360 16,796
Wayne County 81,855 42,485
Town of Wendell 6,146 3,190
Town of Zebulon 4,541 2,357
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 16 -
CWEP FY16 Spring Social Media Campaign Summary
Introduction
Working with Greenroom Communication, CWEP conducted another social media
campaign during Spring 2016, this time featuring the new 30-second Sodfather spot. The
campaign included a new Sodfather Pledge and a chance to win free lawn care services
from Pleasant Green Grass.
Spot
The Spring 2016 social media campaign included Facebook posts with the 30-second
Sodfather spot along with few innovative posts like carousel ads and Sodfather tips as
animated GIFs. The posts were coupled with the Facebook-based Sodfather Pledge.
Target Audience
The Spring 2016 social media campaign was targeted to a smaller geographic area to stay
within the service area of Pleasant Green Grass, since we were offering free lawn care
service to one winner from the Sodfather Pledge. The Facebook posts were also targets
to viewers ages 25-45.
Campaign Performance
The posts and social media sharing generated over 20,030 online impressions, and 530
click-throughs to the Sodfather Pledge page. Because of the tighter targeting, the 30 -
second video had fewer overall views than the Fall campaign, but a higher rate of video
completions. There were 1,931 video views, a 47% completion rate, and a high level of
Facebook post engagement with 266 post clicks, 192 reactions, 31 comments, 136 link
clicks and 59 post shares. The Sodfather Pledge page had 530 visitors, and 21 people
completed the poll.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 17 -
CWEP FY16 Website Summary
http://www.NC clean water.org
CWEP’s website is hosted and maintained by Design Hammer, LLC, an independent and
locally owned web service provider that also handled our website redesign in FY2005-
FY2006. The web language coding protocol is PHP. CWEP currently owns three domains:
nccwep.org (our original domain), nccleanwater.com, and NC clean water.org (preferred).
The home page is updated periodically to align with the outreach campaigns. Concurrent
with most of our media campaigns, we often post a poll on our home page asking visitors
what brings them to our site (the media campaign, a search engine, a bookmark, etc.).
CWEP tracks several web metrics to evaluate traffic on our website (i.e., on-site web
analytics). Design Hammer uses a program called NetTracker to measure these web
analytics. The figures below represent traffic on all three domains in total.
Wikipedia has a good explanation of web analytics terms used below. (Due to calculation
methodologies, metrics that may seem like they should sum may not.)
Month Unique
visitors
Number
of visits
Visits
per
visitor
Pages Pages
per
visit
Hits Bandwidth
(MB)
Av Visit
Duration
(seconds)
Jul-15 1,537 2,361 1.54 4,682 1.98 58,798 623.56 114
Aug-15 1,896 2,831 1.49 6,630 2.34 39,261 982.93 140
Sep-15 2,682 3,924 1.46 10,159 2.17 69,586 1035.00 258
Oct-15 2,653 4,077 1.54 8,858 2.17 65,772 911.14 266
Nov-15 2,055 3,248 1.58 9,225 2.84 51,316 909.67 142
Dec-15 1,790 2,987 1.67 7,411 2.48 34,203 1024.00 115
Jan-16 1,923 3,055 1.59 8,111 2.65 37,419 1718.00 156
Feb-16 1,642 2,435 1.48 5,596 2.30 32,308 883.00 120
Mar-16 1,898 2,603 1.37 5,892 2.26 35,385 561.00 207
Apr-16 2,763 3,578 1.29 6,799 1.90 48,619 758.00 161
May-16 2,423 3,295 1.36 7,686 2.33 47,401 672.57 158
Jun-16 1,562 2,347 1.50 5,373 2.29 30,811 730.34 147
All Year: 24824 36,741 N/A 86,422 N/A 550,879 10809.21 N/A
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 18 -
CWEP FY16 Print Outreach
All print materials described below are available online at
http://www.NCcleanwater.org/outreach/print.php.
CWEP Topical Brochures
In FY2012, CWEP produced five topical brochures for Partners to use in their public
education efforts. The topics correspond to the topics on our Booth (household
hazardous waste/oil recycling, yard care, pet waste, and litter) as well as an additional
brochure on riparian buffers. In FY2013, these brochures were translated to Spanish.
CWEP General Stormwater Brochure
The CWEP general stormwater brochure was reprinted in FY15. Copies are available for
Partners to distribute. In addition, an electron ic copy is available in PDF format on the
CWEP website under “Outreach” and then under “Print.”
CWEP Slicks
CWEP provides “slicks” (see right), pre-made newspaper
advertisements that promote our website and remind citizens that
what they put on their yards ends up in our waterways. Slicks are
generally run simply as filler when a newspaper has a little extra
space. Any CWEP Partner is welcome to submit slicks to their local
news outlets.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 19 -
CWEP FY16 Outreach Booth
CWEP has two outreach booths (with accessories) for Partners to check out for local
events consisting of:
Enviroscape Watershed Model showing how stormwater gets polluted (available only
at RTP location)
Model, accessories (trees, houses, cars), and supplies for “pollution” and rain”
Table to put Enviroscape on
Display (available at both RTP and Coastal locations)
Pop-up display with blue back pieces to attach topical panels to
5 topical panels (English and Spanish) for each of the five topics (two topics
can be attached at any given time): Litter, Hazardous Household Waste, Pet
Waste, Yard Care, and Riparian Buffers
Display banner reading “Clean water begins with you and me”
Table to put display and outreach materials on
For indoor booth use, CWEP also has (RTP location only):
Light hardware to backlight display banner
Extra bulbs for banner backlights
Grounded extension cord for banner lighting
Tablecloth with CWEP logo and tagline
For outdoor booth use, CWEP also has (RTP location only):
10’ x 10’ tent
Tent leg extenders
Tent walls in case of rain
Bucket of sand and string to attach and weigh down tent and/or display
To reserve the booth, the Enviroscape,
or any of these outreach supplies, visit
http://www.supersaas.com/schedule/C
WEP_Booth/CWEP_Partner_Resources.
Please contact Mike Schlegel at
mschlegel@tjcog.org or
919-558-9342 for support on the
booth/Enviroscape or to order
giveaways for local distribution.
CWEP FY16 Annual Report - 20 -
CWEP FY16 Giveaways
CWEP maintains access to topical giveaways that can be ordered by Partners or by CWEP
on behalf of Partners for local distribution. These materials can be displayed and
distributed along with the corresponding booth
panels on that topic, or they can be used
separately. A description of available giveaways
and their cost is provided at
http://nccleanwater.wordpress.com/giveaways
Plant Pride Not Litter stickers and
tattoos (Litter topic)
Soil test kits (Yard Care topic)
Mutt Mitts (Pet Waste topic)
Grease Can Lids in English and Spanish (Hazardous Household Waste topic)
Used oil disposal magnets in English and Spanish (Hazardous Household Waste
topic)
Pencils, “Clean Water Begins with You and Me” (General)
Fat Trapper Bags are no longer available, so a different giveaway was made in FY13.
Grease can lids in both English and Spanish are now available.
PLEASE NOTE: Giveaways can be ordered and directly billed to CWEP Partners or ordered
and delivered to TJCOG for pickup. If ordering for delivery to your Partner location, please
ensure that billing is also directed to your local Partner address. Billing cannot run
through CWEP/TJCOG unless the giveaways are delivered to TJCOG and then picked up by
the Partner.
Please contact Mike Schlegel at
mschlegel@tjcog.org or
919-558-9342 for support on the
booth/Enviroscape or to order giveaways
for local distribution.
CMYK10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 901X, , 2001newsobserver.com/nie
City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Management Contact Information Blair Hinkle 252-972-1294 Assistant Public Works Director / Stormwater Manager Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Stormwater Engineer Ed White 252-467-4907 Streets/Stormwater Superintendent Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Technician (For Stormwater Billing Questions) Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 To Report Drainage Problems or Concerns To Report Illegal Dumping 252-972-1500 City of Rocky Mount Department of Public Works Stormwater Management Program 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html ONLY RAIN DOWN THE STORM DRAIN!!! Stormwater Runoff Pollution Prevention & Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program FOR LAWN AND GARDEN MAINTENANCE City of Rocky Mount Public Works Department Stormwater Management http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Stormwater and Runoff Pollution http://www.ncstormwater.org/ Clean Water Education Partnership http://www.nccwep.org/ Center for Watershed Protection http://www.cwp.org/ OTHER RESOURCES
THE ISSUES THE SOLUTION ‘WHAT YOU CAN DO’ The Tar River and its tributaries are an important natural resource to the residents of the City of Rocky Mount and the State of North Carolina. Stormwater is discharged into the Tar River and its tributaries without filtration or treatment, leading to a reduction in water quality. The most common sources of stormwater pollution are yard waste, eroded soils, trash, household hazardous chemicals, pet waste, and automotive waste. Pollutants in storm drains and ditches prevent proper drainage and degrade water quality in the Tar River, Stoney Creek, and other area lakes and streams. Public education and community involvement to control these pollutants are an essential component of the City’s Stormwater Management Program. The community’s health, safety, and ability to enjoy the Tar River greatly depend on our efforts as a community to reduce stormwater pollution. THE CONSEQUENCES Keep debris out of storm drains and ditches. Don’t blow trash, leaves, grass clippings, or mulch into storm drains, streets, curbs, or waterways. Don’t scalp vegetation on ditch banks. Vegetation prevents erosion and helps filter stormwater flowing into ditches and streams. Bag it up! Put grass clippings, leaves, and other yard waste in bags to be hauled to your nearest refuse facility. Limit the use of chemicals which may be washed into the storm drains. This includes but is not limited to fertilizers, pesticides, and car wash solutions. Clean up spills immediately and properly. Dispose of spilled material appropriately, never in the stormwater system. Wash your equipment in the grass. You can limit run off if you utilize a bucket, sponge, and a hose with a nozzle. The soil serves as a natural filter to chemicals. Be proactive. Check drains and ditches in your area and report issues before they become drainage problems. Spread the word! Do your part to protect our rivers and streams. Not knowing the proper way to handle waste products could lead to pollution and possibly a citation for illegal dumping. Violation of the City of Rocky Mount’s Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Articale5 of the Code of Ordinances) could carry civil penalties of up to $1,000 PER DAY PER VIOLATION from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties. In addition to possible penalties, our water supply may be compromised which could pose problems for ALL city residents and businesses. The City of Rocky Mount appreciates your assistance with this important matter. Working together, we can ensure the health of the Tar River for generations to come.
La Ciudad de Rocky Mount Manejo del Aguas Suminstro Información de Contacto Blair Hinkle 252-972-1294 Asistente de Director de Obras Públicas / Aguas Pluviales Gerente Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Ingeniero de Aguas Pluviales Ed White 252-467-4907 Calles / Aguas Pluviales Superintendente Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Técnico (Para preguntas sobre facturación de Aguas Pluviales) Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 Para Informar de Problemas de Drenaje o Preocupaciones PARA REPORTAR DESECHO ILEGAL 252-972-1500 La Ciudad de Rocky Mount DEPARTAMENTO DE OBRAS PÚBLICAS PROGRAMA DE MANEJO DEL AGUAS SUMINISTRO 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html SÓLO LA LLUVIA ABAJO DEL DREN DE LA TORMENTA !!! LA ABUNDANCIA DE LLUVIA ESCORRENTÍA Y LA PREVENCIÓN DE CONTAMINACIÓN PROGRAMA DE DETECCIÓN DE LAS DESCARGAS ILÍCITAS Y ELIMINACIÓN (IDDE) MANTENIMIENTO DE CESPED Y JARDÍN Ciudad de Rocky Mount Departamento de Obras Públicas Manejo de Aguas Pluviales http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html Departamento de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales de Caro-lina del Norte La Abundancia de Lluvia Caida y la Contaminación http://www.ncstormwater.org/ Agua Limpio Sociedad de Educación http://www.nccwep.org/ Centro para la Protección de Zanjas http://www.cwp.org/ OTHER RESOURCES
LA INFORMACION LA SOLUCIÓN Y LO QUE CADA UNO PUEDE HACER El río Tar y sus afluentes son un recurso natural importante para los residentes de la Ciudad de Rocky Mount y el Estado de Carolina del Norte. Las aguas pluviales se vierten en el río Tar y sus afluentes sin filtración o tratamiento, lo que lleva a una reducción en la calidad del agua. Las fuentes más comunes de contaminación de las aguas pluviales son desechos de jardín, suelos erosionados, basura, productos químicos domésticos peligrosos, desechos de mascotas, y residuos de automoción. Los contaminantes en las alcantarillas y zanjas impiden el drenaje adecuado y degradan la calidad del agua en el río Tar, Stoney Creek, y otros lagos y arroyos de la zona. La educación pública y la participación comunitaria para el control de estos contaminantes son un componente esencial de las aguas pluviales de la Ciudad Programa de Gestión. La salud de la comunidad, la seguridad, y la capacidad para disfrutar del río Tar dependen en gran medida de nuestros esfuerzos como una comunidad para reducir la contaminación de las aguas pluviales. LA CONSEQUENCIAS Mantener los residuos fuera de las alcantarillas y zanjas. No sople la basura, hojas, recortes de césped, o mantillo en los desagües pluviales, calles, aceras o vías de agua. No escalpar vegetación en los bancos de la zanja. La vegetación evita la erosión y ayuda a las aguas pluviales del filtro fluye en zanjas y arroyos. Bolsa para arriba! Ponga los recortes de hierba, hojas y otros desechos de jardín en bolsas para ser remolcado a su centro de basura más cercano. Limite el uso de productos químicos que pueden ser lavados en las bocas de tormenta. Esto incluye pero no se limita a los fertilizantes, pesticidas, y soluciones de lavado de coches. Limpie los derrames de inmediato y adecuadamente. Eliminar el material derramado apropiadamente , nunca en el sistema de aguas pluviales. Lave su equipo en la hierba. Puede limitar corra si usted utiliza un cubo, esponja, y una manguera con una boquilla. El suelo actúa como un filtro natural a los productos químicos. Sea proactivo. Verifique los desagües y zanjas en su área e informar los problemas antes de que se conviertan en problemas de drenaje. Corre la voz! Haga su parte para proteger nuestros ríos y arroyos. Sin saber la forma correcta de manejar los pro-ductos de desecho podría dar lugar a la contaminación y, posiblemente, una citación por vertidos ilegales. Violación de la ciudad de Aguas Pluviales de descarga Ilícito de Rocky Mount y la Ordenanza del dumping o Ilegal (Sección 10 Articale5 del Código de Ordenanzas) podría llevar a multas de hasta $ 1,000 por día por VIOLACIÓn desde la fecha de emisión, así como las posibles sanciones penales. Además de las posibles sanciones, nuestro suministro de agua puede estar en peligro, que podría plantear problemas para TODOS los residentes de la ciudad y las empresas. La ciudad de Rocky Mount agradece su ayuda con este importante asunto. Trabajando juntos, podemos asegurar la salud del río Tar para las generaciones venideras.
City of Rocky Mount Stormwater Management Contact Information Blair Hinkle 252-972-1520 Assistant Public Works Director / Stormwater Mgr. Melissa Wright 252-972-1500 GIS Technician (For Stormwater Billing Questions) Ed White 252-467-4907 Streets/Stormwater Superintendent Donald Perry 252-972-1340 Stormwater Engineer Andy Hicks 252-972-1571 Regulatory Compliance Streets/Stormwater 252-467-4906 To Report Drainage Problems or Concerns To Report Illegal Dumping 252-972-1500 City of Rocky Mount Department of Public Works Stormwater Management Program 331 South Franklin Street P.O. Box 1180 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 stormwater@rockymountnc.gov http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html ONLY RAIN DOWN THE STORM DRAIN!!! Stormwater Runoff Pollution Prevention & Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program FOR THE FOOD SERVICE INDUSTRY EPA Stormwater Management Best Practices http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/stormwater/best_practices.htm NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources: Division of Water Quality Stormwater BMP http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual City of Rocky Mount Public Works Department Stormwater Management http://www.rockymountnc.gov/publicworks/stormwater.html Fats, Oils, and Grease BMP Manual http://www.rockymountnc.gov/utilities/documents/FOGHandbook.pdf OTHER RESOURCES
THE ISSUES THE SOLUTION ‘WHAT YOU CAN DO’ There are various waste sources associated with the food service industry which can lead to stormwater contamination if not handled properly. Some examples of these sources are as follows: Waste Containers Trash Fats, Oils, & Grease Cleaning/Wash Water Landscaping Spills Knowing how to properly contain these po-tential sources of pollution not only saves our water supply, but it improves the appearance of our city as well. Together we can do our part to ensure that we maintain a safe water supply now and for our future generations. THE CONSEQUENCES Waste containers should be sealed against leaks, have a lid that closes properly, and should not be used to dispose of any liquid material . Trash should be swept up and disposed of often, never into a storm drain Fat, Oils, & Grease should never be poured down any drain, stormwater or sewer. All cleaning and cleaning materials should be handled over a sink or in a wash bay area. DO NOT CLEAN equipment outdoors in an area where water can flow to the gutter, storm drain, or street. Never pour wash water down a storm drain, this includes mop buckets. Pesticides and other chemicals should be used sparingly in landscaping. There should be a spill containment kit on hand to handle any accidental spills. Employee training on these issues is a must. Each employee should be made aware of the hazards and consequences for violating the Illicit Discharge ordinance. Not knowing the proper way to handle waste products could lead to pollution and possibly a citation for illegal dumping. Violation of the City of Rocky Mount’s Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping Ordinance (Section 10 Articale5 of the Code of Ordinances) could carry civil penalties of up to $1,000 PER DAY PER VIOLATION from the date of issuance, as well as possible criminal penalties. In addition to possible penalties, our water supply may be compromised which could pose problems for ALL city residents and businesses. The City of Rocky Mount appreciates your assistance with this important matter. Working together, we can ensure the health of the Tar River for generations to come.