Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20010409 Ver 1_Complete File_20010320w 5 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director October 9, 1997 MEMORANDUM To: Michelle Suverkrubbe Through: John From: Cyndi Bell I LT"RMAI Dorn!!6?? C) F== F1 Subject: US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville Haywood County State Project DOT No. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210A; EHNR # 98-0250 The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands. The proposed work would involve no fill in wetlands. Potential impacts to two perennial streams were not quantified. DWQ offers the following comments based on the document review: A) This project will involve culvert extension and/or channel changes at two locations. The potential linear distances of these stream impacts were not included in the EA. If the culverts and/or channel changes exceed 150 feet linear distance of stream at either crossing, stream mitigation will be required in accordance with current DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)). If necessary, said stream mitigation proposal should be included with the permit application. The Wetland Restoration Program will be available to use for stream mitigation for this project. B) DWQ asks NCDOT to stipulate that borrow material will be taken from upland sources in the construction contract awarded for this project. Based upon the wetland and stream impacts described in the EA, General Certification 3103 will be applicable to this project. Please be aware that this is contingent upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary. Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Telephone 919-733-9960 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper Ms. Michelle Suverkrubbe Memo October 9, 1997 Page 2 of 2 DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bell at (919) 733-1786 in DWQ's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch. cc: Steve Lund, COE, Asheville David Cox, WRC Howard Hall, FWS R2110A.DOC r b Environmental Review Tracking Sheet DWO - Water.0uality Section MEMORANDUM TO: Env. Sciences Branch (WQ Lab) O Trish MacPherson (end. sps) O Kathy Herring (forest/ORW/1-lQW) O Larry Ausley (ecosystems) O Matt Mathews (toxicology) O Jay Sauber (intensive survey) Non-Discharge Branch (Archdale 9th) O Kim Colson (Permitting) * Wetlands (WQ Lab) O John Dorney (gorps, 401) Cyndi Bell (DOT) O Eric Galamb llv l OC T Reg./ Prg. Mgmt Coordination Branch O Farrell Keough (Archdale 9th) O Brent McDonald (Archdale 12th) * Regional Water Quality Supervisors O Asheville ' O Mooresville O Washington O Fayetteville O Raleigh O Wilmington O Winston -Salem Planning Branch (Archdale 6th) O Alan Clark (basinwide planning) O Boyd DeVane (classifications & standards) O Beth McGee (management planning) O Ruth Swanek (modeling) (Archdale 9th) Point Source Branch (Archdale 9th) O Dave Goodrich (NPDES) O O Bradley Bennett (Stormwater) O 0 Tom Poe (Pretreatment) (Archdale 7th) O FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Regional / Program Management Coordination Branch Ile /'2--41 . Gt>a rvi//? Attached is a copy of the above document. Subject to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant impacts to the environment, especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority. Please check the appropriate box below and return this form to me along with your written comments, if any, by the date indicated. Thank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining this process are greatly appreciated! Notes: I can be reached at: phone: (919) 733-5083, ext. 567 fax: (919) 715-5637 e-mail: michelle@dem.ehnr.state.nc.us inlsAcircmemo - mac version US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Avenue) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT July, 1997 Planning and Environmental Branch By: -715.91 Date r7 4<k Date •??? CARO(' isslo _ SE Al z 19496 GI NE,. A : 811114140 -28-7? e v P Date Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager Planning and Environmental Branch ahJu e . Hunkins, . E. Pr 'ect Planning Unit Head Administrative Action Environmental Assessment Prepared by the Planning and Environmental Branch of the North Carolina Department of Transportation in Consultation with the Federal Highway Administration This is a Federal Highway Administration Action, Environmental Assessment. 2. Additional Information The following persons can be contacted for additional information concerning this proposal and statement: Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P. E. Division Administrator Federal Highway Administrator 310 New Bern Avenue Suite 410 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Telephone 919/856-4346 Mr. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways Transportation Building Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Telephone 919/733-3141 3. Description of Action The Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation propose to widen and improve US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). This project is approximately 3.5 kilometers (2.2 miles) long. A location map is j shown as Figure 1. The existing two-lane shoulder facility is proposed to be widened to a five-lane, 20.4-meter (68-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter roadway from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial ii Park Drive). No widening is proposed for the existing four-lane section of US 23 Business from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve realignment and resurfacing improvements, where warranted, are proposed for this section of roadway. The proposed project has an estimated cost in the 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) of $ 5,650,000, including $ 2,200,000 for right of way and $ 3,450,000 for construction costs. The cost of the recommended improvements included in this environmental assessment is $ 10,541,000, which consists of $ 3,941,000 for right of way and $ 6,600,000 for construction. 4. Alternatives Considered This project proposes to widen the existing two-lane roadway to a multi-lane facility, and realign and resurface the existing four-lane roadway, where warranted. The two studied alternates, which are evaluated in detail in this document, are described below and are shown in Figure 2. Alternate 1 - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23 Business from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), and resurfacing, where warranted, from approximately 0.4 (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801. Alternate 2 (Recommended) - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23 Business from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), and realignment and resurfacing, where warranted, from approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801. In addition to the alternates described above, consideration was given to maintaining the existing three-lane, 12-meter (40-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street. The section of US 23 Business from East Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 would be widened to a three-lane, 12-meter (40-foot) curb and gutter section. From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, US 23 Business would be resurfaced as needed. However, because of the high traffic volumes projected along US 23 Business in the vicinity of the southern project terminal, it was determined that widening the facility to five lanes along the entire project corridor was necessary to promote safer traffic flow and provide an acceptable level of service. iii It is anticipated that Department of the Army Nationwide Permits # 14 (minor road crossings and/or 426 (above headwaters) will be applicable. A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification will be required by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for activities resulting in a discharge into any of the streams involved with this project. The project lies within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watershed. Planning and construction of the widening project will need to comply with the TVA's "Stream Modification Policy" regarding channelization, modification, and renovation of waters subject to TVA actions. Coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will continue throughout project development since the project is located in a designated "trout" county. 6. Anticipated- Design Exceptions Due to the severe vertical curvature along this segment of US 23 Business, a design speed exception will be necessary from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road). The proposed design speed of this segment will be 60 km/h (35 mph). 7. Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts The proposed improvements will allow more efficient and safer vehicular operation and reduced travel time for commuters near Waynesville, resulting in road user cost savings. It is anticipated that the project will alleviate present and future anticipated traffic congestion along existing US 23 Business. It is anticipated this project will increase traffic mobility and enhance safety. The proposed improvements are warranted to accommodate projected traffic growth and to increase motorists' safety. Approximately 12.3 hectares (30.3 acres) of right of way will be required. No prime farmland of state and locally important farmland will be acquired. Although no jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted by this project, jurisdictional surface waters will be impacted by this project. Implementation of the proposed project will necessitate approximately 40 m (135 feet) of stream modifications to Raccoon Creek. It is anticipated that four (4) residences and seven (7) businesses, none of which are minority or low income displacees, will be relocated as a result of the proposed improvements. Additionally, 26 residential receptors are anticipated to approach or exceed the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours as a result of highway traffic noise in the project area. However, no receptor is expected to experience a substantial increase (considered to be iv 10 dBA, since existing noise levels are greater than 50 dBA). This project is also anticipated to impact five (5) geodetic survey markers. 8. Special Prflject Commitments One-and-a-half meter (5-foot) sidewalks will be provided on the west side of US 23 Business from East Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road). Following confirmation that the Town of Waynesville will commit to sharing the cost of the pedestrian facilities, a municipal agreement regarding cost participation must then be established between the Town of Waynesville and the NCDOT. Throughout the entire project, outside travel lanes of 4.2 meters (14 feet) in width will be provided to accommodate bicycle traffic. Since the project will be constructed as a curb and gutter facility, bicycle-safe grates will be provided throughout the project. This project is not expected to impact jurisdictional wetlands; however, impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." Since the proposed project is located in a designated "trout" county, the authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon concurrence by the NCWRC on the proposed project. Stream impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project. These impacts are associated with the construction and extension of culverts and/or pipes. The details of stream involvement and modification will be detailed in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification, and compensatory mitigation with regard to stream mitigation is left to the discretion of DWQ. The NCDOT will coordinate with the DWQ to fulfill any necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. The NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters should be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project. Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during construction will also be strictly enforced. If encroachment or fill placement in the 100-year floodway is necessary, the NCDOT will insure that no increase in the base flood discharge elevations will occur. The NCDOT will coordinate with USCOE and the NCWRC during final hydraulic design to insure that any environmental concerns are appropriately addressed, and with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations. v To minimize surface water impacts, the proposed project will include: Consideration of decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of right-of-way widths and fill slopes. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. To avoid adverse impacts to the Miller-Francis House (eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places), FHWA and NCDOT commit to the following: Installation and maintenance of protective fencing along the property (right of way) easement line during construction. If roots are encountered during construction, the contractor is required to cleanly cut them and exercise good tree protection practices. 9. Basis for the Environmental Assessment On the basis of planning and environmental studies, it is anticipated this project will not have a significant detrimental effect on the quality of the natural or human environment. The proposed project will cause no significant changes in planned land use and is not controversial in nature. The project has been reviewed by federal, state, and local agencies, and no objections have been raised. No major objections were voiced at the Citizens Informational Workshop held on May 8, 1996. For these reasons, it is concluded that an Environmental Assessment is applicable to the project. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY PAGE 1. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT I A. B. C. D. E. F. General Description I Purpose of the Project I Independent Utility and Logical Termini I Project Status 2 Project Terminals 2 Existing Roadway Inventory for Intersecting Roads 3 1. Length of Roadway Section Studied 3 2. Existing Cross Section 3 3. Route Classification 3 4. Right of Way 3 5. Access Control 4 6. Vertical and Horizontal Alignment 4 7. Sight Distance 4 8. Speed Limits 4 9. Intersecting Roads and Type of Control 4 10. Interchanges 4 11. Bridges and/or Culverts 5 12. Railroads 5 13. Sidewalks/Greenways 5 14. Bicycle Accommodations 6 15. Utilities 6 16. School Bus Data 6 17. Degree of Roadside Development 6 18. Airports 6 G. Traffic Volumes 6 H. Existing Facility Capacity Analysis 7 1. Mainline Analysis 7 2. Intersection Analysis 8 I. Thoroughfare Plan 9 J. Accident Investigation 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 10 A. Recommended Alternate 10 B. Project Length 10 C. Cross Section Description 10 D. Right of Way 10 E. Access Control 10 F. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control 10 G. Level of Service and Area Road Network 11 H. Bridges and/or Culverts 13 1. Design Speed 14 J. Sidewalks 14 K. Bicycle Accommodations 14 L. Greenways 15 M. Landscaping 15 N. Noise Barriers 15 0. Multiple Use of Space 15 P. Changes in the State Highway System 15 Q. Railroads 15 R. Degree of Utility Conflicts 15 S. Anticipated Design Exceptions 16 T. Cost Estimates 16 U. Stage Construction 16 V. Special Permits Required 16 W. Geodetic Survey Markers 16 X. Other Proposed Improvements in the Project Area 17 Y. Effect of the Project on Existing Roads 17 Z. Benefits to Community, State, and Region 17 III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 18 A. Recommended Alternates 18 B. "Do-nothing" Alternate 18 C. Alternate Modes of Transportation 18 D. Postponement of Proposed Action 18 E. Alignment Alternates 18 F. Typical Section Alternates 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 20 A. Social Effects 20 1. Land Use 20 a. Existing Land Use 20 b. Existing Zoning 20 C. Proposed Land Use 20 d. Project Consistency With Local Plans 21 2. Neighborhood Characteristics 21 3. Relocatees 21 4. Public Facilities 22 5. Social Impacts 22 6. Environmental Justice 22 7. Cultural Resources 23 a. Architectural/Historic Resources 23 b. Archaeological Resources 24 B. Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Properties 24 1. Section 4(f) Resources 24 2. Section 6(f) Resources 24 C. Economic Factors 25 D. Environmental Effects 25 1. Biological Resources 25 a. Plant and Terrestrial Wildlife Communities 25 b. Aquatic Communities 28 C. Potential Impacts to Biotic Resources 28 d. Protected Species 30 1. Federally Protected Species 30 2. Federal Species of Concern and 35 State-Listed Species TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE V 2. Water Resources 38 3. Jurisdictional Wetlands and Surface Waters 42 a. Permit Requirements 42 b. Wetland Mitigation 43 1. Avoidance 43 2. Minimization 44 3. Compensatory Mitigation 44 4. Soils 45 5. Flood Hazard Evaluation 46 6. Noise Analysis 47 a. Characteristics of Noise 47 b. Noise Abatement Criteria 48 C. Ambient Noise Levels 49 d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels 49 e. Traffic Noise Levels and Noise Contours 50 f. Highway Noise Abatement 52 g. "Do-Nothing Alternative 53 h. Construction Noise 54 i. Summary 54 7. Air Quality Analysis 54 8. Hazardous Wastes/Geological Impacts 57 9. Farmland 57 10. Construction Impacts 58 COORDINATION AND COMMENTS 60 I TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) TABLES PAGE Table 1 - Existing Cross Section Along US 23 Business 3 Table 2 - Right of Way Widths Along US 23 Business 4 Table 3 - Current and Proposed Traffic Projections 6 Table 4A - Mainline Capacity Analysis 7 Table 4B - Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8 Table 4C - Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9 Table 5 - Accident Rates 9 Table 6 - Proposed Intersection Treatment 11 Table 7A - Mainline Capacity Analysis (Proposed Improvements) 12 Table 7B - Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Level of Service (Proposed Improvements) 12 Table 7C - Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Level of Service (Proposed Improvements) 13 Table 8 - Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities 29 Table 9 - Federally Protected Species for Haywood County 31 Table 10 - Federal Species of Concern and State-Listed Species for Haywood County 37 Table 11 - Soils Within the Project Study Area 45 Table 12 - One Hour CO Concentrations 56 MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Proposed Improvements (Aerial) Figure 2A - Location of Existing and Proposed Greenway Trail Figure 3 - Current and Projected Traffic Volumes Figure 4 - Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan Map Figure 5 - Proposed Typical Section Figure 6 - 100-Year Floodplain Map Figure 7 - USGS Map Identifying Raccoon Creek and Tributaries 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E PAGE - Correspondance and Comments Received A-1 - Geological Environmental Impact Study B-1 - Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise Tables/Air Quality Analysis Tables C-1 - Relocation Report and Discussion of Division of Highways Relocation Programs D-1 - Citizens Information Workshop Press Release and Citizens Information Workshop Handout E-1 I. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. Descr ption of the Project and Proposed Improvements The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen existing US 23 Business (Asheville Road) to a five-lane curb and gutter facility from the northeast Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to 0.4 kilometers (km) (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive). No widening is proposed for US 23 Business from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve realignment and resurfacing improvements, where warranted, are proposed for this section of roadway. The project termini stated in this report vary slightly from those listed in the 1998-2004 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The general project location is shown in Figure 1. The proposed improvements are shown in Figure 2. B. Purpose of the Project The purpose of this project is to alleviate present and future anticipated traffic congestion along existing US 23 Business. It is anticipated this project will increase traffic mobility and enhance safety. The proposed improvements are warranted to accommodate projected traffic growth and to insure motorists' safety. As a result of the proposed improvements, the benefits to the community, state, and region will be more efficient and safer vehicle operation, and reduced travel time. Indirect socio-economic benefits will be derived from the general improvement of highway transportation. US 23 Business is a north-south route. For the purpose of this document, the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive), the southern project terminal, will be referred to as Marshall Street, and US 23 Business will be denoted as US 23B. C. Independent Utility and Logical Termini According to 23 CFR 771.111(f). "...in order to ensure meaningful evaluation of alternatives and to avoid commitments to transportation improvements before they are evaluated, the action evaluated... shall; Connect a logical termini and be of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope; Have an independent utility or independent significance, i.e., be usable and be a reasonable expenditure even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made; and 2 Not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements." The proposed project's southern terminus is located at the northeastern Waynesville City Limit, at the US 23B/Marshall Street intersection. The project's northern project terminus is the US 23B/SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) intersection. The locations of the proposed project's termini have been coordinated with adjoining programmed TIP Projects; these termini do not preclude the development and assessment of multiple alternates for adjoining programmed TIP projects. In this regard, the proposed project demonstrates logical termini and independent utility. This project can stand alone as a functioning project and is designed to be compatible with the TIP project designated for improvements to the US 19-23-74/ US 23B interchange (R-2210 B). Right-of-way acquisition and construction of R-2210 B is currently scheduled to begin post year (after 2004). The environmental impacts related to the interchange improvements will be fully evaluated in a separate environmental document. FHWA and NCDOT have determined this project meets the criteria set forth in 23 CFR 771.111(f). D. Project Status The 1997-2003 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls for the widening of the existing roadway to a multi-lane facility. Right-of-way acquisition and construction are scheduled to begin in Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000, respectively. The TIP includes a total funding of $ 5,650,000, including $ 2,200,000 for right of way and $ 3,450,000 for construction costs. The cost of the recommended improvements included in this environmental assessment is $ 10,541,000, which consists of $ 3,941,000 for right of way and $ 6,600,000 for construction. E. eject Termini The southern terminal of this project is the intersection of US 23B with Marshall Street at the northeast Waynesville City Limit. At this location, US 23B has one northbound lane, one southbound lane, and an exclusive left-turn lane in both directions. Woodland Drive and Marshall Street both have two-lane, two way traffic in the eastbound and westbound directions. The northern terminal of this project is the intersection of US 23B and SR 1801. At this location, US 23B has two northbound through lanes, plus an exclusive right-turn lane. In the eastbound direction, the US 19-23-74 egress ramps have through lane with a shared left turn plus an exclusive right-turn lane. In the westbound direction, SR 1801 has a through lane with a shared right turn, plus an exclusive left-turn lane. F. Existing Roadway, Inventory for Intersecting Roads The approximate length of the studied section of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 is approximately 3.5 kilometers (km) (2.2 miles). 2. Existing Cross Section The existing cross section along US 23B is outlined below in Table 1. TABLE 1 EXISTING CROSS SECTION ALONG US 23 BUSINESS SEGMENT CROSS SECTION Marshall Street to East Street Three-lane (with continuous center turn lane), 12-meter (40-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section East Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of Two-lane, 6.6-meter (22-foot) roadway SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) with 1.2- to 1.8-meter (4- to 6-foot) grassed shoulders From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 Four-lane, 15.6-meter (52-foot) (face to to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) face of curbs) curb and gutter section US 23B is classified as a rural major collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System. Throughout the study corridor, US 23B is designated a major thoroughfare on the Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan. 4. Right of Way Approximate right-of-way widths for segments of US 23B are shown in Table 2, below. 4 TABLE 2 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS ALONG US 23 BUSINESS SEGMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) 18 meters (60 feet) From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Drive) 30 meters (100 feet) 5. Access Control There is no control of access along existing US 23B in the proposed project corridor. 6. Vertical and Horizontal Alignment Although the terrain is rolling throughout the project, the vertical alignment along US 23B is good, with the exception of the vicinity of the southern project terminal where the vertical alignment is poor. The horizontal alignment, however, is poor along the proposed route as several undesirable curves exist along the route. 7. Sight Distance Although several undesirable curves exist along existing US 23B, the overall sight distance along the alignment is acceptable based on current NCDOT design standards. 8. Speed Limits The speed limit along US 23B varies from 56 to 72 kilometers per hour (km/h) (35 to 45 miles per hour [mph]). 9. Intersecting Roads and Tyne of Control The US 23B/Marshall Street and US 23B/US-19-23-74 (ramps)/SR 1801 intersections are currently signalized; all other roadways intersect with US 23B at grade and have stop sign control. 10. Interchanges The US 19-23-74/US 23B interchange is located adjacent to the northern project terminal. 5 11. ages and/or Culverts The existing structure where US 23B crosses Raccoon Creek is the only major stream crossing associated with this project. It is a 4.2-meter x 2.7-meter (14-foot x 9-foot) bottomless single barrel reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). This culvert is approximately 11.4 meters (38 feet) in length along its centerline and is located approximately 0.4 km (0.26 miles) north of SR 1802 (Francis Farm Road) (see Figures 1, 2, and 7). 12. Railroads There are no railroad crossings on US 2313; however, the Southern Railway closely parallels US 23B from the vicinity of SR 1267 to the vicinity of SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) (see Figure 2). In this area, the railway right of way is 15 meters (50 feet); at its closest point to US 2313, the centerline of the Southern Railway is approximately 18.9 meters (63 feet) from the edge of pavement of the existing roadway. 13. A 1.2-meter (4-foot) concrete sidewalk exists on both sides of US 23B from Marshall Street northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street. Within the proposed study corridor, the Richland Creek Greenway Trail parallels the proposed project to the west of US 23B and currently exists in two segments. The first segment of this greenway trail originates on Marshall Road in the vicinity of the Waynesville/Marshall Road Park and proceeds northeastward approximately 0.85 km (0.53 mile) to the vicinity of the WaynesvilleNance Street Park. The second segment exists as a fitness trail and is located in the vicinity of the Champion Paper Company, located approximately 270 meters (900 feet) west of the proposed project, along SR 1184 (Howell Mill Road) (see Figure 2A for a graphic representation). The 1.1 km (0.69 mile) of existing sidewalks located along Marshall Road and Main Street, west of the proposed project, and the existing Richland Creek Greenway Trail, are two elements of the current pedestrian facility commitment endorsed by the Town of Waynesville, Haywood County, the Lake Junaluska Assembly, and the Richland Creek Action Committee. In the opinion of these officials, construction of pedestrian facilities along the subject project would comprise the third and final element of the pedestrian facility plan for the Town of Waynesville and this area of Haywood County (see Appendix A, pages A-25 and A-26, and Figure 2A for a graphic representation of this description). 6 14. Bicycle Accommodations US 23B is not a designated bicycle route, nor are any special accommodations for bicycles currently provided along US 23B. 15. Utilities Several utilities are located along this project, including power lines, sewer systems, telephone lines and underground water lines. According to a preliminary utility investigation, this project will have high utility involvement. 16. School Bus Data Currently, there are 12 buses (24 trips) per day along US 23B from Marshall Street to the vicinity of SR 1801. 17. Degree of Roadside Developmen Development along US 23B is light to moderate, consisting of scattered residences and businesses. From the southern project terminal to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road), residences and businesses are located close to the existing right-of-way boundary. 18. Airports No airports exist within 3.2 km (2 miles) of the proposed project. G. Traffic Volumes Current and projected average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for US 23B are shown below in Table 3. TRAFFIC VOLUMES TABLE 3 (IN VEHICLES PER DAY [VPD]) FACILITY 1997 1997 2020 2020 (LOW) (HIGH) (LOW) (HIGH) US 23B 13,200 vpd 17,500 vpd 23,000 vpd 29,400 vpd The projected volumes generally include 1% truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and 2% dual-tired (DT) vehicles. Traffic projections for the years 1997 and 2020 are shown in Figures 3A and 3B. 7 H. Existing Fa ili opacity Analysis The concept of level of service (LOS) is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic system and how these conditions are perceived by motorists and/or passengers. A level-of-service definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Six levels are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operational conditions and LOS F representing the worst. Mainline capacity analyses were performed on the existing two-lane highway for the current year (1997) and the existing two-lane and proposed five- lane highway for the construction year (2000), and the design year (2020) (see Table 4A). TABLE 4A MAINLINE CAPACITY ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) SEGMENT ON US 23B 1997 2000 2020 (no-build) (no-build) From Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove E E F Road) SR 1191 to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) E E F SR 1196 to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Rd.) E E F SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) A A B The results of the capacity analysis illustrate the need for widening existing US 23B. Table 4A shows that the current (1997) traffic which utilizes the facility is experiencing a high level of congestion. In considering the expected LOS in the design year (2020) under the "no-build" scenario, it is anticipated that traffic congestion will worsen along the project corridor. These results provide justification for the proposed improvements discussed in this report. This analysis also shows that widening the existing facility would significantly improve the level of service along the project. Where curve realignment and resurfacing of the existing facility is proposed, the LOS is anticipated to remain essentially the same. 2. Intersection Analysis Intersection capacity analyses were performed for major intersections due to heavy turning movements anticipated at these locations. Table 4B shows the level of service (LOS) for the existing conditions at unsignalized intersections and Table 4C shows the LOS for the existing conditions at Marshall Street and SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), the currently signalized intersections along the study corridor. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 4B ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) INTERSECTION WITH 1997 2000 2020 US 23B (no-build) (no-build) SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove FB FB F/C Road) SR 1193 (Nesbitt Street) D/A DB F/B SR 1195 (Sims Circle D/A EB FB Road) SR 1250 (Sims Circle) D/A FB F/C SR 1196 (East Howell FB F/B F/C Mills) SR 1267 (Industrial Park CB CB F/C Drive) NOTE: The level of service results are divided into two parts: left and right turns (minor srreers)irejt Turns (US 23B). 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 4C ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) INTERSECTION WITH 1997 2000 2020 US 23B (no-build) (no-build) Marshall Street CB D/B F/C SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) CB CB C/E NOTE: The level of service results are divided into two parts: Lowest LOS between test ana rtgni iurne (minor streets)/lowest LOS between northbound and southbound movements (US 23B). I. Thoroughfare Plan and System L.iWi= US 23B is designated a major thoroughfare on the Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan, which was adopted in 1979 (see Figure 4). For design purposes, US 23B is considered a rural collector. A comparison of accident rates along US 23B and the statewide rates for rural two-lane "US" routes is shown in Table 5, below. The rates shown for US 23B were obtained from studies conducted from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 1996. The statewide rates were obtained from studies conducted from 1992 through 1994. TABLE 5 ACCIDENT RATES (PER 100 MILLION VEHICLE KILOMETERS [MVK]) ACCIDENT TYPE RATES ALONG US 23B HAYWOOD COUNTY STATEWIDE AVERAGE FOR "US PRIMARY ROUTES" (2-LANES) All Accidents 219.0 173.4 Fatal 0.0 2.5 Non-Fatal 93.1 82.2 Nighttime 35.3 49.0 Wet Conditions 47.8 41.5 It is anticipated the proposed project will result in a safer facility by providing additional lanes and improving sight distance. 10 II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Recommended Alternate TIP Project R-2210 A proposes to widen existing US 23B to a five-lane curb and gutter facility from Marshall Street to 0.4 kilometers (km) (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive). This project will utilize a combination of east side, west side, and symmetrical widening of US 23B in an effort to minimize overall impacts to the natural and human environment. No widening is proposed for US 23 Businness from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve realignment and resurfacing improvements, where warranted, are proposed for this section of roadway. B. Project Length The approximate length of the proposed project is 3.5 kilometers (km) (2.2 miles). C. Cross Section Description It is recommended that US 23B be improved to a five-lane, 20.4-meter (68-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section from Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267. From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, US 23B will remain a four-lane, 14.6-meter (49-foot) curb and gutter section. This section includes a 78-meter (260-foot) long and 1.2-meter (4-foot) wide concrete island along US 23B, from approximately 200 meters (680 feeet) south of SR 1801 to 125 meters (420 feet) south of SR 1801. D. Right of Way Generally, the proposed right-of-way width for this project will be 30 meters (100 feet); however, areas with more severe terrain and/or curvature may require additional right of way. E. Access Control No additional control of access is proposed for this project due to the need to provide access to existing residences, businesses, and public facilities. F. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control All roadways will intersect the project at grade. All intersecting roadways will have stop sign control, with the exception of the intersections of US 23B with Marshall Street, US 19-23-74/SR 1801, and SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road); these three intersections will be signalized. II At all intersections along the proposed project, US 23B will be widened to five lanes, including two northbound through lanes, two southbound through lanes, and an exclusive left-turn lane in the northbound and southbound directions. Table 6 describes the configurations of the three intersecting roads with US 23B that are proposed for improvements in conjunction with this project. TABLE 6 PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTING STREET WITH TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT US 23B SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) Addition of an exclusive right-turn lane on northbound US 23B and an exclusive right- turn lane on westbound SR 1818 Lake Junaluska Middle School (LJMS) Addition of exclusive right-turn lanes on entrance/SR 1250 (Sims Road) northbound approach of US 23B and westbound approach of LJMS entrance. SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) Add signal, provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the southbound approach of US 2313, and provide an exclusive left-turn lane on eastbound SR 1196. G. Level of Service and Area Road Network According to the results of the capacity analysis which was conducted along US 23B within the study corridor, widening the existing facility would improve the overall level of service (LOS) along the project. The lowest LOS along the mainline on the most southern section (Marshall Street to SR 1191 (Francis Farm Road)) dictates the LOS on the mainline. For this reason, it is anticipated that traffic on US 23B will operate at LOS C in the design year (2020) (see Table 7A, below). Where realignment and resurfacing of the existing four-lane facility is proposed, the LOS along US 23B north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) is anticipated to remain essentially the same. 12 MAINLINE CAPACITY ANALYSIS TABLE 7A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) SEGMENT ON US 23B 2000 2020 From Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove A C Road) SR 1818 to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) A B SR 1196 to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) A B SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road A B Although improvements to three intersecting roads with US 23B (SR 1191 (Francis Farm Road), SR 1250 (Sims Road), and SR 1196 (Howell Mills Road)) will be performed in conjunction with this project, it is anticipated that the LOS for intersecting roads within the study corridor will, in general, remain the same (see Figures 7B and 7C, below). UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 7B ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) INTERSECTION WITH 2000 2020 US 23B SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove FB F/C Road) SR 1193 (Nesbitt Street) FB F/C SR 1195 (Sims Circle FB F/C Road) SR 1250 (Sims Circle) FB F/C SR 1267 (Industrial Park FB F/C Drive) NOTE. The level ojservice results are divided into rwo parrs: Jeji unu rrgnl turns (rnowi a?i MS/ r• •? (US 23B). 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 7C ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) INTERSECTION WITH 2000 2020 US 23B Marshall Street CB DB SR 1196 (East Howell Mill B/A BB Road) SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) CB CB NOTE. The level of service results are divided into two parts: lowest LOS between left and right turns (minor streets)/lowest LOS between northbound and southbound movements (US 23B). As shown in Table 713, the capacity analysis for the minor streets (left and right turns) yields LOS F. Two scenarios were evaluated to improve the level of service for minor streets along the proposed project: geometric revisions (lane additions) and signalization. The addition of lanes on minor streets would not result in an improvement to the LOS of the intersection; therefore, geometric revisions were not recommended. Intersections that operate at an overall level of service F do not necessarily warrant signalization. The intersecting roads with US 23B not recommended for improvements in conjunction with this project have such low traffic volumes (current year and design year) that signals are not justified. Therefore, signalization of these intersections is not currently recommended. However, these intersections will be monitored and signals installed when warranted. It is noted that US 23B, south of Marshall Street, the southern project limit, is a three-lane, curb and gutter roadway; therefore, motorists traveling south on US 23B may experience a decrease in the LOS in the vicinity of Marshall Street as a result of the transition from a five-lane to a three-lane facility. In the vicinity of SR 1801, the northern project terminal, and the US 19-23-74 interchange which is located adjacent to the northern project terminal (see Figure 2), no changes to US 23B are proposed in conjunction with this project. This area of the project corridor will remain relatively unchanged; therefore, no improvement or degradation in the LOS for the US 19-23-74 interchange or US 23B north of SR 1801 is anticipated. s H. Bridges and/or Culvert A culvert, located approximately 0.4 km (.25 mile) north of SR 1802 (Francis Farm Road), accommodates flow from Raccoon Creek. This culvert consists of a 14 4.2-meter x 2.7-meter (14-foot x 9-foot) bottomless, single-barrel reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). This culvert is approximately 11.4 meters (38 feet) in length along its centerline. It has been determined that this culvert is not structurally sufficient to accommodate the increased traffic loading associated with the proposed project. Therefore, it is recommended to remove the existing culvert and replace it with a double- barrel 3.7-meter x 3.0-meter (12-foot x 10-foot) RCBC. Because Raccoon Creek contains no protected trout, the proposed structure is not required to be bottomless. Culvert inverts will be buried 0.3 meter (1 foot) below the existing stream bed. Any other drainage structures (such as pipes) that are located along the project will be retained and extended to accommodate the widened roadway. The existing 4.6-meter (15-foot) corrugated metal pipe located to the west of US 23B will be extended southward to accommodate improvements proposed for the US 23B/SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) intersection. 1. Design Speed With the exception of the segment of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) where the design speed will be 60 km/h (35 mph), the proposed design speed is 80 km/h (50 mph) throughout the project. The existing sidewalks located on both sides of US 23B, from Marshall Street northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street, will be replaced with 1.5-meter (5-foot) sidewalks. Per current NCDOT policy, new pedestrian facilities are funded jointly by NCDOT and the municipality having jurisdiction. However, this project is not located within the corporate limits of the Town of Waynesville; the project is located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town of Waynesville. Haywood County has requested additional pedestrian facilities (see Appendix A, page A-25) along the west side of US 23B from East Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road); accordingly, Town of Waynesville and Haywood County staff are coordinating with NCDOT to determine the appropriate funding and maintenance responsibilities and agreements which will be required regarding the construction of the new pedestrian facilities along US 23B (see Appendix A, pages A-25, A-26, and A-29 through A-31). A written agreement between NCDOT and the Town and/or County will be executed prior to construction of the proposed project. According to the Town of Waynesville, the construction of these additional pedestrian facilities, as described above, is the third and final element of the Waynesville Pedestrian Facility Plan (as discussed in Section I.F.13). K. Bicycle Accommodations The NCDOT's Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation recommends 15 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside lanes to accommodate bicycles. Town of Waynesville and Haywood County officials have also requested bicycle accommodations along the proposed project. Bicycle accommodations, including the incorporation of bicycle-safe grates, can be incorporated into the project by reducing berm widths for both sides of the proposed roadway from 3.0 meters (10 feet) to 2.4 meters (8 feet) and providing additional pavement width to achieve the 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside lanes. The NCDOT will incorporate these accommodations into the project (see Figure 5). L. Greenways No improvements to existing greenways are proposed in conjunction with this project. M. Landscaping No special landscaping is currently proposed by FHWA or NCDOT in conjunction with this project. N. Noise Barriers No noise barriers are proposed for this project. 0. Multiple Use of Space Right of way along the project will be utilized for public utilities (within certain limitations). P. Changes in the State Highway System No changes in the State Highway System are anticipated. Q. Railroad Southern Railway is located west of US 23B and is parallel to the proposed project (see Figure 2). No conflicts with this railway are anticipated to result from the improvements to US 23B. R. Degree of Utility Conflicts Public Service of North Carolina (PSNC) is currently involved in preliminary planning for the installment of gas lines along the east side of US 23B. Coordination between NCDOT and PSNC is underway. It is anticipated that the project will impact power lines, sewer systems, telephone lines, and underground water lines. 16 S. Anticipated Design x p ion Due to the severe vertical curvature along this segment of US 2313, a design speed exception will be necessary from Marshall Street to SR 1818. The proposed design speed for this segment will be 60 km/h (35 mph). T. Cost Estimates Cost estimates for the proposed project are as follows: CONSTRUCTION $ 6,600,000 RIGHT OF WAY $ 3,941,000 TOTAL COST $ 10,541,000 U. Staged Construction The portion of this project which includes construction of the culvert at Raccoon Creek will be stage constructed. First, the two new lanes over the new culvert will be constructed immediately east of the existing culvert to accommodate maintenance of traffic during construction. Traffic will then be shifted onto the new travelway. The next phase will consist of demolishing the existing culvert and extending the new travelway westward to complete the new culvert. V. ' Special Permits Reg iu red It is anticipated that COE Nationwide Permits #14 (minor road crossings) and/or 426 (above headwaters) are applicable for this project. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from DEHNR-DWQ for activities resulting in a discharge into any streams involved with this project. Coordination with NCWRC will continue throughout project development and the permit application phase since the project is located in a designated "trout" county. This project lies within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watershed. Planning and construction of the widening project will require compliance with the TVA's "Stream Modification Policy" regarding channelization, modification, renovation of waters subject to TVA actions. W. Geodetic Survey Markers it is anticipated this project will impact five (5) geodetic survey markers. The North Carolina Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction. 17 X. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Project Area There are six other TIP Projects in the project area: TIP Project B-1481: Replace Bridge No. 265 on Boyd Avenue over Richland Creek in Haywood County. This project is scheduled for construction in Fiscal Year 1997. 2. TIP Project B-3186: Replace Bridge No. 155 on US 23-74 (northbound lane only) over Richland Creek in Haywood County. Construction is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2002. TIP Project B-3340: Replace Bridge No. 94 on US 19 over Richland Creek in Haywood County. Right-of-way acquisition and construction are scheduled to begin in Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002, respectively. 4. TIP Project R-2117: NC 209 from US 19-23-74 to I-40 in Haywood County. Portions of this project are complete; other parts of this project are scheduled for post year (after 2004) right-of-way acquisition and construction. TIP Project R-2210 B: Reconfigure US 19-23-74 interchange with US 23B in Haywood County. This project includes ramp and service road relocation and associated improvements. This project is scheduled for pst year (after 2004) right-of-way acquisition and construction. 6. TIP Project U-3830: Widen Main Street to multi-lane facility in Haywood County. This project is currently scheduled for feasiblity study. Y. Effect of the Project on Existing Roads It is anticipated that the improvements to US 23B will result in a positive effect on existing roads by providing increased sight distance and, thus, reducing the accident potential. Additionally, some intersecting roads which currently have hazardous skews (resulting in substandard sight distance) may experience a reduction in the existing hazardous conditions as a result of the widened facility. Z. Benefits to Community, State and Region As a result of the proposed improvements, the benefits to the community, state, and region will be more efficient and safer vehicle operation, and reduced travel time. Indirect socio-economic benefits will be derived from the general improvement of highway transportation. 18 III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION A. Recommended Alternative The recommended alternative consists of the following improvements: 1. Widening US 23B to a five-lane, curb and gutter roadway from Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive); and 2. Minor realignment and resurfacing of US 2313, where warranted, from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). B. "Do-Nothing" Alternative Although this alternative would avoid the limited environmental impacts that are anticipated to result from the project, there would be no positive effect on the traffic capacity and safety of existing routes in the project vicinity. The existing route would continue to experience increased traffic demands, necessitating roadway improvements. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. C. Alternate Modes of Transportation No alternate mode of transportation is considered to be a practicable alternative. Highway transportation is the dominant mode of transportation in the area, and the project involves the improvement of an existing highway facility. D. Postponement Alternative Postponement of the project would result in a continuing deterioration of traffic flow and safety along the existing transportation corridor in the future as traffic demand increases. Therefore, this alternative in not recommended. E. Widenine Alternatives Two widening scenarios were studied for the proposed project: Alternate 1 - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23B from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267, and resurfacing from approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, and Alternate 2 (Reco men" - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23B from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), and minor resurfacing and 19 realignment, where warranted, from approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801. Exclusive east side, west side, or symmetrical widening throughout the proposed project was not considered due to the presence of properties potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the possibility for inducing channel changes in water bodies in the project vicinity, the presence of underground storage tanks, the severe existing terrain along some portions of the project, and the potential for additional residential and business relocations. F. Other Alternatives Two alternatives with varying typical sections were studied. The first alternative proposed to widen US 23B to a three-lane, 12-meter (40-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section from East Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267. Since US 23B currently is a multi-lane facility from Marshall Street northward to East Street and from approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to south of SR 1801, resurfacing improvements, where warranted, would be proposed for these sections. This alternative was dropped from further consideration because projected traffic volumes along US 23B would allow unsafe traffic flow and a facility that functioned at an undesirable Level of Service (LOS F in 2007). The second alternative, requested for study by Town of Waynesville and Haywood County officials, included the provision of a four-lane, median-divided section from the vicinity of SR 1191 (Francis Street) to SR 1802 (Francis Farm Road). With the exception of the section of US 23B from north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, where multi-lanes currently exist, the remainder of the project would be widened to a five-lane, curb and gutter section. Resurfacing improvements, where warranted, would be proposed for the remainder of the project. It was determined that the four-lane, median-divided typical section, in conjunction with the proposed five-lane section, was not practicable for such a short distance and would cause several unwarranted impacts, including the need for additional right-of-way acquisition, residential relocations, and the potential for vehicular access and storage conflicts for turning vehicles that are anticipated. Therefore, this recommendation was dropped from further consideration. 20 IV. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS A. Social Effects a. Existing Land Use The project area is characterized as urbanized with a scattered mix of residential land uses and some commercial uses. The primary land use in the project area is low to medium-density single-family residential uses. There are scattered commercial uses through the project corridor; some strip commercial uses are located in the area at the southern project terminal. The Waynesville Industrial Park is located on SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive). The Waynesville Landfill is located approximately 0.8 km (0.5 mile) south of the project area. There are scattered areas of wooded and undeveloped land along the project corridor. b. Existing Zoninc, The project area is zoned primarily for R-2 (low density) to R-4 (medium density) residential land uses. The area at the project beginning has areas zoned for strip commercial uses. Both areas in the vicinity of the project termini have zones for light industrial and heavy commercial uses. C. Proposed Land Use The majority of the proposed improvements (from Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive)) is located within the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City of Waynesville. The city has a land use plan, developed in 1977, which is used as the city's land use guidance tool, but this land use plan has never been officially adopted. The city enforces zoning and subdivision regulations. According to local planning officials, the project area is anticipated to experience primarily single-family residential land use growth with some commercial and industrial growth. The residential growth is expected throughout the project area while uniform commercial growth is expected along the south end of the project, and industrial growth towards the northern project terminus. 21 d. Project Consistency With Local Plans In both NCDOT's TIP and the Waynesville Thoroughfare Plan, US 23B was among the roadways perceived by local officials as most in need of improvement. Additional justification for the project comes from the need to increase the safety and capacity of US 23B by the proposed improvements. 2. Geographical and Neighborhood Characteristics Haywood County is located in the western section of the state and is bounded by Buncombe, Henderson, Jackson, Madison, Swain, and Transylvania Counties, as well as the State of Tennessee. As of September, 1996, the total population in Haywood County is 46,942, consisting of 22,382 males and 24,560 females. The total number of minorities is less than 1,000. The proposed corridor is located in a densely populated mountainous community that follows existing US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). The development along the proposed project site consists of residential, commercial, and institutional establishments. 3. Relocatees It is estimated that four (4) residential and seven (7) business relocations will result from the implementation of Alternate 2 (Recommended). It is anticipated that adequate replacement housing will be available for any relocatees. The relocation report is included in Appendix D (see pages D-1 and D-2). It is the policy of the NCDOT to insure that comparable replacement housing will be available prior to construction of federal and state assisted projects. The NCDOT has the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of moving: Relocation Assistance • Relocation Assistance Payments • Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or "Rent Supplement." See Appendix D for further discussion of the NCDOT Relocations Programs (see pages D-3 and D-4). 22 4. Public Facilities Public facilities located along the proposed corridor include the Plumbline Baptist Church, Junaluska Elementary School, and Tuscola High School. The proposed project is not anticipated to affect any of these public facilities. 5. Social Impacts it is anticipated that the proposed project will have a positive social impact. These positive impacts will be derived from those persons utilizing the proposed highway facility; convenience and travel safety will be enhanced. In addition, it is anticipated that businesses in the project area will experience a positive economic thrust due to improved access and reduction in congestion. Public facilities will probably benefit as a result of the improved visibility and accessibility. 6. Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 requires that each federal agency, to the greatest extent allowed by law, administer and implement its programs, policies, and activities that affect human health or the environment so as to identify and avoid "disproportionately high and adverse" effects on minority and low-income populations. The proposed project will not segment any existing minority community or separate residential areas from nearby services, such as schools, businesses, or parks. None of the potential relocatees are minorities nor are any of the relocatees considered low income. A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on May 8, 1997 at the Lake Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria in Waynesville to gather input from the public on the proposed project. Input solicited as a result of the workshop and subsequent substantive concerns submitted to FHWA and NCDOT have been considered and incorporated into the project, as practicable. Based on project studies and public involvement incorporated into this project's development, this project has been implemented in accordance with Executive Order 12898. 26 ofcinale), wood sorrel (Oxalis spp.), clover (Trifolium spp.), violets (Viola spp.), and buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Areas receiving less frequent maintenance are occupied by broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), yarrow (Achillea millefolium), and ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Vegetation associated with residential and business landscapes includes flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), azalea (Rhododendron spp.), white pine (Pinus strobus), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), Norway spruce (Picea abies), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), various ornamental hybrids of hollies (Ilex spp.), arbor avitae (Thuja spp.), and juniper (Juniperus spp.). Lawn areas are dominated by fescue, clover (Trifolium spp.), plantains, and crabgrass (Digitaria spp.). Agricultural fields that are used for pasture and forage crop production are present within the floodplain of Raccoon Creek. This area is generally located in the central portion of the project area. Vegetation within the agricultural fields is dominated by fescue. Vegetative species that occur to a lesser extent include clover, wild carrot (Daucus carota), buttercup (Ranunculus bulbosus), yarrow, goldenrod, ragweed, and asters (Aster spp.). Jewel-weed (Impatiens capensis) is found along the banks of Raccoon Creek in the open fields. Small mammals that commonly occur within the maintained/disturbed community are the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), house mouse (Mus musculus), least shrew (Cryptotis parva), and eastern mole (Scalopus aguaticus). The house mouse is found in association with human activities where it finds food and shelter in barns, houses, restaurants, and warehouses. It does equally as well in weedy and overgrown fields. Eastern moles excavate extensive tunnels and feed upon earthworms, insects, and plant material. The Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) and raccoon (Procyon lotor) are very adaptive mammals that will frequent this habitat for foraging opportunities. The eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) will utilize the open fields and disturbed habitats to forage on shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. Avian species likely to utilize this habitat for refuge and foraging opportunities include downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), American robin (Turdus migratorius), Carolina chickadee (Parus carolinensis), Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus), and house sparrow (Passer domesticus). These species will take advantage of feeders and nesting sites provided by human settlement. 25 There are no properties within the proposed project corridor which have been acquired or developed with assistance of Section 6(0 funds. C. The North Carolina civilian labor force estimates for September, 1996 indicate that Haywood County had a total labor force of 23,070. Out of this total, 22,290 persons were gainfully employed. This left an unemployment total of 790 or 3.4 percent. It is anticipated that the business community will benefit from the proposed highway improvements due to the provision of a safer highway facility for the motorists frequenting these businesses. In addition, the transportation of goods and services will be enhanced by the improved accessibility provided by the new facility. An improved highway facility will save time and energy by eliminating some congestion along the project corridor. This, in turn, will provide increased travel efficiency for residents, employees, merchants, and services in the area. D. Environmental Effects a. Terrestrial Plant and Wildlife Communities Two terrestrial communities are identified in the project study area: maintained/disturbed and mixed hardwood forest. Community boundaries within the study area are well defined without a significant transition zone between them due to development within the study area. Faunal species likely to occur within the study area will exploit both communities for shelter and foraging opportunities or as movement corridors. Maintained/Disturbed Community Several habitats exhibiting similar characteristics are included in this community: road shoulders, residential and business landscapes, and agricultural fields. Road shoulders are irregularly maintained, receiving only periodic mowing and herbicide applications. Residential and business landscapes receive more frequent mowing and general maintenance. The agricultural fields within the study area consist of pasture and forage crop fields, where the vegetation receives continuous disturbance through grazing and harvesting. Road shoulders act as buffers between the roadway and surrounding communities by filtering stormwater run-off. Vegetation occurring here includes fescue (Festuca spp.), dandelion (Taraxacum 24 b. Archaeological Resources An archaeological investigation within the proposed project corridor was conducted by NCDOT archaeological staff. No evidence of archaeological resources was discovered within the APE of the undertaking. FHWA and NCDOT have determined that the proposed project will not involve significant archaeological resources. SHPO has concurred with these determinations, and no further archaeological evaluation is required (see Appendix, page A-10). B. Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Resources Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that publicly owned land from a public park, recreation area, historic site, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge of national, state, or local significance may be used for a federal-aid project only if: 1. There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land, and 2. Such a highway program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to Section 4(f) lands resulting from such use. The only Section 4(f) property identified along the project corridor is the Miller-Francis House, located approximately 0.3 km (0.19 mile) south of SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) on the west side of US 23B; this property is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The recommended alternate, Alternate 2, was developed to avoid impacts to this National Register-eligible property. Measures, such as alignment shifts, have been taken to avoid encroachment on this property. The SHPO has concurred with the FHWA's determination that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the historic property (see Appendix A, pages A-7 and A-8). No easements, temporary or permanent, will be acquired within the eligible property's boundary. This completes compliance of Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended. 2. Section 6(f) Resource Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 states that "no property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the Secretary [of the Department of the Interior], be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses." 23 This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires that if a federally funded, licensed, or permitted project has an effect on a property listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) will be given the opportunity to comment. Potential historic architectural and archaeological resources within the proposed project corridor were assessed. Based on investigations, the proposed project will not affect cultural resources. The project is in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. a. Historic Architectural Resources To comply with Section 106, the Area of Potential Effect (APE) of the subject project was reviewed by NCDOT historic architectural staff. The Miller-Francis House is located approximately 30 meters (100 feet) from the existing right-of-way boundary approximately 0.3 km (0.19 miles) south of SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) on the west side of US 2313; the property has been determined to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. SHPO has concurred with the FHWA's determination that the project, as proposed, will not have an adverse effect on Miller-Francis House (see Appendix A, pages A-7 and A-8) provided the following conditions are incorporated into the project plans and special provisions: Installation of protective fencing along the property (right of way) easement line. If roots are encountered during construction, the contractor is required to cleanly cut them and exercise good tree protection practices. Several additional properties over fifty years old are located within the APE; however, these properties are not listed in or considered eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and no further evaluation of these properties is necessary. The SHPO has concurred with this determination (see Appendix A, page A-9). Since there are no other properties either listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places within the APE of this undertaking, no further compliance with either Section 106 or the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 is necessary. 27 The American kestrel (Falco sparverius) will forage on small birds and mammals in this community. Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) and black racer (Coluber constrictor) frequent open and disturbed habitats. They will find suitable shelter and foraging opportunities in proximity with human activities. Mixed Hardwood Forest 4 Mixed hardwood forest is present in a variety of sizes and ages within the project area. All areas of this forest have had some degree of disturbance and include invasive ornamentals originating from nearby urban landscapes. Residential and commercial activities have displaced the original forest with disturbed habitat. The larger parcels of this community type are located in the northeastern third of the project area. Smaller remnants of the mixed hardwood forest community are situated within the maintained/disturbed community. The canopy of the larger parcels is dominated by white oak (Quercus alba), red oak (Q. rubra), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa). Other representatives of the canopy include black walnut (Juglands nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), and black locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia). Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) occur along the edges of this community. The shrub layer consists of flowering dogwood, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and saplings of the canopy layer. Invasive species include privet (Ligustrum spp.), which was locally dense, and prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americana). Vines observed within this community formed a dense cover, especially on the outer edges of this community. Representative vine species include bittersweet (Celastrus scandens), grape (Vitis spp.), poison ivy, and Japanese honeysuckle. The herb layer was fairly sparse due to the dense shrub and vine layers. Herbaceous vegetation includes Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium plaryneuron), and spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata). The mixed hardwood forest offers habitat for a variety of fauna. The gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Virginia opossum, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), raccoon, eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), and woodchuck (Marmota monax) are inhabitants of this community. The presence of stratification provides habitat for avian species such as the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), red-bellied woodpecker 28 (Melanerpes carolinus), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens). Reptilian species include the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus), and black racer. Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) serves a predatory role by feeding on small vertebrates. b. Aquatic communities impacted by the proposed project include Raccoon Creek and its tributary. Physical characteristics of the water body and condition of the water resource influence faunal composition of aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence aquatic communities. Fauna associated with the aquatic communities include various invertebrate and vertebrate species. Raccoon Creek is classified as a Robin-Warmouth stream, "supporting some fishing for bluegill and other sunfishes." Prey fish, including shiners (Notropis spp.), creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), and longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), provide foraging opportunities for redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auratus), bluegill (L. macrochirus) and warmouth (L. gulosus). Invertebrates that would be present include crayfish (family: Cambaridae), nymphal and larval stages of mayflies (Order: Ephemeroptera), and caddisflies (Order: Trichoptera). The bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frog (R. palustris), and northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon) are common permanent residents in this community. The tributary to Raccoon Creek will provide habitat for similar species of invertebrates that are found in Raccoon Creek. The substantially lower water flows in this tributary will preclude the presence of a significant fish population in this stream. However, juveniles of the Raccoon Creek fish population may find habitat and sanctuary in this tributary during high flow periods. Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic resources described above. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to impact biological functions. The following discussion quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are considered here as well. 29 Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each community present within the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these communities. Table 8, below, summarizes potential quantitative losses to these biotic communities, resulting from project construction. Although the proposed right of way width for this project is 30 m (100 ft), the estimated impacts were derived using a maximum proposed right of way width of 36.5 m (120. ft) to account for permanent right of way plus possible temporary easements. Usually, project construction does not require the entire right of way; therefore, actual impacts may be considerably less. TABLE 8 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO BIOTIC COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY IMPACTS Maintained 7.0 (17.2) Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.7 (1.8) TOTAL 7.7 (19.0) NOTE: Values cited are in hectares (acres). Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering habitat for various wildlife. Widening US 23B and its associated improvements will reduce habitat for faunal species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers. However, since the project area is dominated by disturbed habitats, it is anticipated that impacts to fauna will be minimal. Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become early successional habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the roadway while attracting other wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for the species. Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. Stream channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation, and erosion from construction-related work will affect water quality and biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts often associated with in-stream construction include increased channelization and scouring of the streambed in Raccoon Creek. In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove 30 streamside vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will produce siltation, which clogs the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-feeders), fish, and amphibian species. Benthic organisms can also be covered by excessive amounts of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a stream. The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction site alters the terrain. Alteration of the streambank enhances the likelihood of erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation carry soils, toxic compounds, and other materials into aquatic communities at the construction site. These processes magnify turbidity and can cause the formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, thereby' altering water flow and the growth of vegetation. Streamside alterations also lead to more direct sunlight penetration and to elevations of water temperatures which may impact many species. Stream impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project. These impacts are associated with the construction and extension of culverts and/or pipes. The details of stream involvement and modification will be detailed in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification, and compensatory mitigation with regard to stream mitigation is left to the discretion of DWQ. The NCDOT will coordinate with the DWQ to fulfill the necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. Methods to minimize these potential impacts are discussed in Section IV.D.I.d. d. Protected Species Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended [ESA]) requires that any action likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Other species may receive additional protection under separate state laws. 1. Federally Protected Species Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA. As of May 2, 1997, the USFWS lists seven federally-protected species for Haywood County (see Table 9). 31 TABLE 9 FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES FOR HAYWOOD COUNTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Alasmidonta raveneliana Appalachian elktoe E Clemmys muhlenbergii bog turtle T S/A Felis concolor couguar eastern cougar E Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Carolina northern flying squirrel E Gymnoderme lineare rock gnome lichen E Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle T Isotria medeoloides small-whorled pogonia E "E" denotes Endangered, a taxon which is in danger of extinction throughout att or a stgnrVtcanr portion of its range. "T" denotes Threatened, a taxon which is likely to become and endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. "T S/A " denotes Proposed Threatened due to similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for protection.. Alasmidonta raveneliana (Appalachian elktoe) E The Appalachian elktoe is a small mussel with a maximum length reaching up to 8.0 cm (3.2 inches). Although its shell is thin, it is not fragile, nor is it subovate (kidney-shaped). The periostracum (outer shell) of the adult Appalachian elktoe is dark brown in color, while juveniles have a yellowish-brown color. Three known populations of the Appalachian elktoe exist in North Carolina: the Nolichucky River (including its tributaries of the Cane River and the North Toe River); the Little Tennessee River and its tributaries; and the Tuckasegee River. The Appalachian elktoe has been observed in gravelly substrates often mixed with cobble and boulders, in cracks of bedrock, and in relatively silt-free, coarse sandy substrates. Extensive survey work in western North Carolina by the USFWS and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) indicates that the Appalachian elktoe is restricted to three populations, in the Little Tennessee River in Macon and Swain Counties, in the Tuskasegee River in Swain County, and in 32 the Nolichucky River basin in Yancey and Mitchell Counties. The Appalachian elktoe is not likely to be found outside of its current distribution area. The proposed project will not impact any water bodies within those areas. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Appalachian elktoe in the project vicinity. Therefore, it can be concluded that construction of this project will have no impact on the Appalachian elktoe mussel. Clemmys muhlenbergii (bog turtle) T S/A The bog turtle is North Carolina's smallest turtle, measuring 7 to 10 cm (3 to 4 in.) in length. It has a dark brown carapace and a black plastron. The bright orange or tellow blotch on each side of the head and neck is a readily identifiable characteristic. The bog turtle inhabits damp grassy fields, bogs and marshes in the mountains and western Piedmont. The bog turtle is shy and secretive, and will burrow rapidly in mud or debris when disturbed. The bog turtle forages on insects, worms, snails, amphibians, and loose seed. In June or July, three to five eggs are laid in a shallow nest in moss or loose soil. The eggs hatch in about 55 days. The bog turtle is listed as Proposed Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T S/A). This is due to its similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for protection. T S/A species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; therefore, a biological conclusion is not required. Felis concolor cougar (eastern cougar) E Cougars are tawny colored with the exception of the muzzle, the backs of the ears, and the tip of the tail, which are black. In North Carolina the cougar is thought to occur in only a few scattered areas, possibly including coastal swamps and the southern Appalachian mountains. The eastern cougar is found in large remote wilderness areas where there is an abundance of their primary food source, white-tailed deer. A cougar will usually occupy a range of 40 square km (25 square miles) and they are most active at night. Suitable habitat in the form of large tracts of remote wilderness is not present in vicinity of the project area. The NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no 33 listing of the eastern cougar within the project vicinity; therefore, project construction will have no affect on the eastern cougar. Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus (Carolina northern flying squirrel) E The Carolina northern flying squirrel has a large well furred flap of skin along either side of its body. This furred flap of skin is connected at the wrist in the front and at the ankle in the rear. The skin flaps and its broad flattened tail allow the northern flying squirrel to glide from tree to tree. It is a solely nocturnal animal with large dark eyes. There are several isolated populations of the northern flying squirrel in the western part of North Carolina along the Tennessee border. This squirrel is found 1.5 km (0.95 mile) above mean sea level (MSL) in the vegetation transition zone between hardwood and coniferous forests. Both forest types are used to search for food, and the hardwood forest is used for nesting sites. Suitable habitat in the form of hardwood and coniferous forests does not exist within the project area. Project elevation is 0.8 km (0.5 mile) MSL, which is well below elevations where this species is normally found. Additionally, the NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Carolina northern flying squirrel within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will have no affect on the Carolina northern flying squirrel. Gymnoderma lineare (Rock gnome lichen) E The rock gnome lichen is a squamulose lichen in the reindeer moss family. The lichen can be identified by its fruiting bodies which are born singly or in clusters, black in color, and are found at the tips of the squamules. The fruiting season of the rock gnome lichen occurs from July through September. The rock gnome lichen is a narrow endemic, restricted to areas of high humidity. These high humidity environments occur on high elevation (> 1.2 km/0.76 mile above MSL) mountaintops and cliff faces which are frequently bathed in fog or lower elevation (< 0.8 km 10.5 mile below MSL) deep gorges in the Southern Appalachians. The rock gnome lichen primarily occurs on vertical rock faces where seepage water from forest soils above 34 flows only at very wet times. The rock gnome lichen is almost always found growing with the moss Adreaea in these vertical intermittent seeps. The major threat of extinction to the rock gnome lichen relates directly to habitat alteration/loss of high elevation coniferous forests. These coniferous forests usually lie adjacent to the habitat occupied by the rock gnome lichen. The high elevation habitat occurs in the counties of Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Mitchell, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, and Yancey. The lower elevation habitat of the rock gnome lichen can be found in the counties of Jackson, Rutherford, and Transylvania. Suitable habitat in the form of high humidity areas, high elevation vertical rock faces, and deep gorges does not exist within the project study area. Additionally, the NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the rock gnome lichen within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the rock gnome lichen. Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) E Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail. The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight, bald eagles can be identified by their flat wing soar. Eagle nests are found in proximity to water (within 0.8 km [0.5 mile]) with a clear flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion. Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees away from human disturbance does not exist within the project area. Bald eagles may find foraging opportunities in Lake Junaluska; however, project construction will not interrupt potential foraging activities in this water body. The NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the bald eagle in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle. 35 Isotria medeoloides (small-whorled pogonia) E Small-whorled pogonia is a perennial orchid having long hairy roots and a hollow stem. Stems terminate in a whorl of five or six light green, elliptical leaves that are somewhat pointed. One or two light green flowers are produced at the end of the stem. Flowers of small-whorled pogonia have short sepals. The small-whorled pogonia grows in "second growth deciduous" or deciduous-coniferous forests with an open canopy, open shrub layer, and sparse herb layer. It prefers acidic soils. Flowering is inhibited in areas where there is relatively high shrub coverage or high sapling density. The remnant mixed hardwood forests within the project area contain very dense shrub and vine layers. Very little herbaceous vegetation was present in this forest community. Subsequently, no small-whorled pogonia habitat was observed during the field surveys which were conducted by NCDOT staff biologists Bruce Ellis and Logan Williams on May 28, 1996. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database of rare species and unique habitats revealed no listing of small-whorled pogonia within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the small-whorled pogonia. 2. Federal Species of Concern and State-Listed Species There are 31 Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Haywood County. Federal Species of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the ESA and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Species of Concern are defined as those species which may or may not be listed in the future. These species were formally candidate species, or species under consideration for listing for which there was insufficient information to support a listing of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Significantly Rare (SR), or Special Concern (SC) by the NCNHP list of rare plant and animal species are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. Table 10 lists Federal Species of Concern and State-listed species, the species state status, and the existence of suitable 36 habitat for each species in the study area. This species list is provided for information purposes as the status of these species may be upgraded in the future. Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were any of these species observed. A review of the NCNHP data base of the rare species and unique habitats revealed no records of North Carolina rare and/or protected species in or near the project study area. 37 TABLE 10 FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN AND STATE-LISTED SPECIES FOR HAYWOOD COUNTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT Abies fraseri Buckleya disticophylla Cardamine clematitis Carex manhartii Clemmys muhlenbergi Contopus borealis Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Delphinium exaltatum Dendroica cerulea Eulochus marialiciae Euphorbia purpurea Glyceria nubigena Fraser fir Piratebush Mountain bittercress Manhart's sedge Bog turtle Olive-sided fly catcher Hellbender Tall larkspur Cerulean warbler Mary Alice's Small-headed fly Glade spurge Smokey Mountain manna grass Butternut Mount Leconte moss Fraser's loosestrife C E C C T SC SC E-SC SR SR C NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO Juglands cinerea Leptohymenium sharpii Lysimachia fraseri Microtus chrotorrhinus carol inensis Neotoma floridana haematoreia Neotoma magister Phyciodes batesii Plagiochila caduciloba Plagiochila sharpii Plagiochila sullivanatii var. sullivantii Rugelia nudicaulis Saxifraga caroliniana Silene ovata Sorex palustris punctulatus Spenolobopsis pearsonii Speyeria diana Sylvilagus obscurus Thryomanes bewickii altus Trillium pusillum var. 1 T W5? C E NO NO NO YES Southern rock vole SC NO Southern Appalachian woodrat SC NO Alleghany woodrat SC NO Tawny crescent butterfly SR NO A liverwort E NO A liverwort C NO A liverwort C NO Rugel's ragwort T NO Carolina saxifrage E NO Mountain catchfly C NO Southern water shrew SC NO A liverwort C NO Diana fritillary butterfly SR NO Appalachian cottontail SR NO Appalachian Bewick's wren E NO Alabama least trillium E NO rraicn LAW 38 2. Water Resources Waters in the project vicinity are part of the French Broad River Basin. The French Broad River Basin in North Carolina consists of three major river systems that include the French Broad, Pigeon, and Nolichucky Rivers. The French Broad River occupies a central position within the basin. The three rivers flow in a northwesterly direction and eventually converge in Tennessee. Waters within the project area are located in sub basin 04-03-05 of the French Broad River basin. Project area waters drain to the northwest and eventually empty into the Pigeon River. The Pigeon River is the western most river system of the French Broad River basin. The major water resource within the project area is Raccoon Creek. US 23B crosses over Raccoon Creek approximately 1.6 km (1.0 mile) north of the southern terminus of the project (see Figures 1, 2, and 7). Raccoon Creek then flows in a northwesterly direction until it converges with Richland Creek, 760 m (2500 ft) downstream of US 23B. Richland Creek continues in a northerly direction until it empties into Lake Junaluska approximately 760 m (2500 ft) downstream of the confluence of Raccoon and Richland Creeks. Richland Creek reforms downstream of the Lake Junaluska dam and eventually joins with the Pigeon River 3.2 km (2.0 mile) further north. Raccoon Creek, at US 23B, is 4.6 m (15.0 ft) wide and has an average depth of 0.3 m (1.0 ft). The substrate is composed of boulder, rubble, gravel, and sand. Water clarity was excellent. No submersed aquatic vegetation was observed. One other stream crossing was observed during the site investigation. This is a small perennial unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The stream is located approximately 610 m (2000 ft) north of where US 23B crosses over Raccoon Creek. The stream is 0.8 m (2.5 ft) wide, 2.5 cm (1.0 in) in depth, and has a substrate composed of sand and silt. Water flow was very low and no aquatic vegetation was observed. Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The classification of Raccoon Creek and its unnamed tributary (index no. 5-16-14) is B. The B classification denotes freshwaters protected for primary recreation which includes swimming on a frequent or organized basis and all Class C uses. Class C uses include aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I, or undeveloped watersheds, or WS-II; predominately undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mile) of the project area. 39 The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by the DWQ (formerly the Division of Environmental Management) and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water quality. The program assesses water quality by sampling for benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Many benthic macroinvertebrates have stages in their life cycle that can last from six months to a year; therefore, the adverse effects of a toxic spill will not be overcome until the next generation. Different taxa of macroinvertebrates have different tolerances to pollution, thereby, long term changes in water quality conditions can be identified by population shifts from pollution sensitive to pollution tolerant organisms (and vice versa). Overall, the species present, the population diversity, and the biomass are reflections of long term water quality conditions. No BMAN stations are situated on Raccoon Creek; however, a BMAN station is located within the project vicinity on Richland Creek at SR 1188. Since the BMAN station on Richland Creek is approximately 365 m (1200 ft) west of the project area, water quality results from this station will provide some insight to water quality conditions within the project vicinity. Richland Creek has been sampled on four occasions since 1983. The resulting bioclassifications from these sampling events are: 1983/Poor, 1985 and 1988/Fair, and 1992/Good-Fair (DWQ, 1994). DWQ indicates that, historically, water quality concerns in Richland Creek have been substantial, however, the positive changes in water quality conditions reflect improvements made by manufacturing/industrial facilities within the basin (DWQ, 1994). The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake, and estuarine water quality monitoring stations strategically located for the collection of physical and chemical water quality data. The sample frequency and type of water quality data or parameters that are collected are determined by the waterbody's freshwater or saltwater classification and corresponding water quality standards (DWQ, 1995). An AMS is located on Richland Creek at SR 1188 (Medford Road). Water quality monitoring results from this station reveal that water quality criteria were exceeded at least once for the following parameters: fecal coliform, turbidity, copper, iron, mercury, and zinc (DWQ, 1994). Lake Junaluska, is a 81-hectare (200-acre) lake, located 1.4 km (0.9 mile) downstream of the project area. Lake Junaluska is monitored as part of the DWQ Lakes Assessment Program. DWQ (1994) reports that Lake Junaluska "has had problems with sedimentation and eutrophication." As a result of sedimentation, the lake has needed to be dredged about once every ten years since 1964 (DWQ, 1994). Sources of sedimentation, as reported by the DWQ, include highway construction and residential and industrial growth within the Lake Junaluska watershed. 40 Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is required to register for a permit. No point source dischargers are listed for Raccoon Creek or its unnamed tributary. However, Richland Creek contains several point source dischargers. Champion International Corporation, within the project vicinity, is permitted to discharge 5700 cubic meters (1.5 million gallons per day) of non-contact cooling water and condensate into Richland Creek. The outfall is located approximately 0.5 km (0.3 mile) upstream of the confluence of Richland and Raccoon Creeks. Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater or snowmelt. In urban areas, high concentrations of impervious surfaces greatly increases runoff rates and volumes. Stormwater collection systems then transport runoff waters quickly to receiving streams with little or no filtering by vegetated surfaces. Contaminants originating from urban development include: lawn care products, such as, pesticides and fertilizers; automobile-related pollutants that include lubricants, abraded tire and brake linings; lawn and household wastes; and fecal coliform bacteria from animals and failing septic systems. The high velocity and volumes of runoff can also cause increased erosion of stream channels through physical scouring of the stream banks and floodplain. As indicated by the DWQ (1994), the water quality within the project vicinity has been adversely affected by urban and industrial development. Recent water quality monitoring data suggests that water quality is improving, largely through improvements made by industry. Within the project vicinity, Richland Creek and Lake Junaluska are the water resources that have received the most impact. The Raccoon Creek watershed has received impacts from residential and commercial development; however, it has not been subject to industrial development and its associated water quality impacts. Construction of the proposed project will impact water resources by one or more of the following processes: roadway widening, box culvert and/or pipe construction, and box culvert and pipe extension. Construction activities are likely to alter and/or interrupt stream flows and water levels at each aquatic site. This disruption of the stream reduces stream flow downstream of the project. Temporary diversions of water flow will raise the water level upstream from the project and lower the water level downstream of the project. Estimated linear impacts are derived using entire maximum proposed right-of-way widths. Construction of the new culvert proposed for Raccoon Creek will necessitate approximately 40 m (133 ft) of stream impacts due to culvert replacement and result in approximately 100 m (330 ft) of stream rechannelization. For streams which will be impacted by channelization and/or relocation, these stream banks will be re-vegetated. The NCDOT will coordinate 41 with the NCWRC and the USFWS to fulfill the necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. Additionally, approximately 10 m (33 ft) of the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek will be impacted as a result of pipe extension. No rechannelization of this tributary is anticipated. Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters: 1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion. 2. Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and vegetation removal. 3. Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface and ground water flow from construction. 4. Changes in water temperature due to vegetation removal. 5. Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas. 6. Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction, toxic spills, and increased vehicular use. To minimize surface water impacts, the proposed project will include: Consideration of decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of right-of-way widths and fill slopes. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. Although the NCDOT has reduced impacts to surface waters along US 23B by decreasing the berm width from to 3.0 meters (10 feet) to 2.4 meters (8 feet), additional precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area. The NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surfacd waters will be strictly enforced during the 42 construction stage of the project. Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during the construction interval will also be strictly enforced. Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual." The three parameter approach is used where hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be present for an area to be considered a wetland. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area; however, jurisdictional surface waters are present. a. Permit Requirements Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project study area. This permit authorizes construction provided the following conditions are met: 1. the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual crossing; 2. the fill placed in Water of the United States is limited to a filled area of no more than 0.1 hectares (1/3 acre); 3. no more than a total of 61 m (200 linear ft) of the fill for the roadway can occur in special aquatic sites, including wetlands; 4. the crossing is culverted, bridged, or otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and movement of aquatic organisms; and 43 5. the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of "Waters of the United States." North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 Water Quality General Certification is required prior to the issuance of the Section 404 Nationwide 14. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or other land manipulations. The authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon the concurrence of NCWRC. The proposed project is located in a designated "trout" county. A letter of comment has been obtained by NCWRC concerning the proposed project for the crossing of Raccoon Creek and the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek (see Appendix A, pages A-23 and A-24). The NCWRC states that trout do not occur at these sites and they are unaware of any other special concerns regarding the project. b. Wetland Mitigation The COE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of "Waters of the United States." Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially. I . Avoidance Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to wetlands and surface waters. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes. 44 The purpose and need of the proposed project cannot be met without impacting "Waters of the United States." Avoidance of these waters is not a practicable alternative because of the terrain features associated with the location of the project corridor. 2. Minimization Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce adverse impacts. Implementation of these steps will be required through project modifications and permit conditions. Practicable means to minimize impacts to surface waters impacted by the proposed project include: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. - Minimization of "in-stream" activities. Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to wetlands and surface waters have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is recognized that "no net loss" of wetlands and surface water functions and values may not be achieved in each and every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been required. Compensatory actions often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of wetlands. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site. No jurisdictional wetlands will be affected by this project, and no compensatory mitigation is proposed in conjunction with this project. 45 4. &ih The project study area lies within the Mountain Physiographic Province. The topography within the project region is characterized by mountainous areas frequently dissected by streams. The project area is situated in a small valley where Raccoon Creek has formed a moderately sized alluvial plain. Elevations within the project area vary slightly, averaging approximately 790 in (2600 ft) above mean sea level (MSL). Higher hilltops within the project vicinity average 884 m (2900 ft) in elevation. Five soil map units occur within project boundaries: Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, Dillsboro-Urban land complex, Udorthents, Evard-Cowee-Urban land complex, and Hayesville-Urban land complex. The Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex is associated with the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek and is the only undisturbed soil unit within the project area. The other four units are soils that have been disturbed from excavation or by urban development. Table 11 lists study area soils in the order of relative dominance. TABLE 11 SOILS WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA MAPPING SOIL PERCENT DRAINAGE HYDRIC UNIT SLOPE CLASS CLASS CxA Cullowhee-Nikwasi somewhat Complex 0-2 poorly hydric3 & poorly DuC Dillsboro Urban Land Complex 2-15 well2 non hydric Ud Udorthents, loamy not applicable variable non hydric ExD Evard-Cowee-Urban Land Complex 15-30 well2 non hydric HeC Hayesville-Urban Land Complex 2-15 well non hydric A modern soil survey for Haywood County is currently not avadabie. Sou injormanon was provided by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) of Haywood County. Drainage Class for the soil in its undisturbed state. Classified as Hydric due to the Nikwasi (listed as hydric) portion of this map unit, frequentlyJlooded. The Cullowhee-Nikawasi complex is confined to the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek and occupies the central portion of the project area. However, most of the area occupied by this soil is used as pasture or in hay production. This map unit typically contains approximately 50 percent Cullowhee soils and 35 percent Nikawasi soils. Cullowhee soils (sandy loam) are closer to 46 the stream channel where they are associated with natural levees and are higher on the landscape than the Nikwasi (loamy) soils. The Nikwasi soils are present in narrow floodplains, and this soil unit is listed as hydric. Flooding and wetness are the main use limitations for this soil complex. Udorthents consists of soils where the natural soil layering sequence has been destroyed by earth moving machines. The disturbance is such that the original soil series is no longer identifiable. Soil characteristics, such as drainage class, slope, and productivity, are no longer applicable. Udorthents are present in the northern portion of the study area where significant soil disturbance associated with roadway construction and commercial and urban development have occurred. The remaining map units are soil complexes that contain urban land. Urban land is described by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) (formerly the U. S. Soil Conservation Service) as soils that are "covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, railroad yards and airports." The natural soils were greatly altered by cutting, filling, grading, and shaping during the process of urbanization. The original landscape, topography, and commonly the drainage pattern have been changed." Due to the presence of impermeable surfaces, surface runoff is high and erosion is a hazard with unprotected soils. Generally, urban land comprises 20 to 35 percent of these soil complexes. The higher densities of residential and urban development in proximity to the roadway suggest that urban land is present in a proportionally higher percentage in this area. Soil core samples taken throughout the project area revealed soils with a silty texture. The soils did not exhibit hydric characteristics, such as sulfidic odor, gleyed or low chroma colors, or mottling. Therefore, hydric soil indicators, as defined in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual," 1987, were not observed within the project study area. 5. Flood Hazard Evaluation Both Haywood County and the Town of Waynesville participate in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. The Raccoon Creek site is in a flood hazard zone and is included in a detailed flood study. A floodplain map, which delineates the established limits of the 100-year floodplain and floodway in the project vicinity, is included in Figure 6. There are no buildings in the project vicinity with floor elevations below the 100-year flood level. The backwater from the proposed culvert at Raccoon Creek will be significantly reduced, compared to that of the existing culvert, and will not have an adverse impact on the existing floodplain nor on associated flood hazards. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable. Groundwater resources will be assessed in final design to insure that measures are taken, if necessary, to avoid groundwater 47 contamination. The NCDOT will coordinate with the USCOE and the NCWRC in final hydraulics design to insure that any environmental concerns are appropriately addressed, and with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations in this area. 6. Noise Analysis An analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed widening of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) in Haywood County on noise levels in the immediate project area. This investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land uses and a field survey of ambient (existing) noise levels in the study area. It also includes a comparison of the predicted noise levels and the ambient noise levels to determine if traffic noise impacts can be expected resulting from the proposed project. Traffic noise impacts are determined from the current procedures for the abatement of highway traffic noise and construction noise, appearing as Part 772 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered. a: Characteristics of Noise Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted from many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power generation plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic noise, is usually a composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive train, and tire-roadway interaction. The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure. Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is used to relate sound pressures to some common reference level, usually the decibel (dB). Sound pressures described in decibels are called sound pressure levels and are often defined in terms of frequency weighted scales (A, B, C, or D). The weighted-A decibel scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle noise measurements because it places the most emphasis on the frequency range to which the human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound levels measured using a weighted-A decibel scale are often expressed as dBA. Throughout this report, all noise levels will be expressed in dBA's. Several examples of noise pressure levels in dBA are listed in Table N 1 (see Appendix C, Page C-1). 48 Review of Table N 1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or annoyance of unwanted sound depends essentially on three things: 1. The amount and nature of the intruding noise. 2. The relationship between the background noise and the intruding noise. 3. The type of activity occurring when the noise is heard. In considering the first of these three factors, it is important to note that individuals have different sensitivity to noise. Loud noises bother some more than others and some individuals become upset if an unwanted noise persists. The time patterns of noise also enter into an individual's judgment of whether or not a noise is offensive. For example, noises occurring during sleeping hours are usually considered to be more offensive than the same noises in the daytime. With regard to the second factor, individuals tend to judge the annoyance of an unwanted noise in terms of its relationship to noise from other sources (background noise). The blowing of a car horn at night when background noise levels are approximately 45 dBA would generally be more objectionable than the blowing of a car horn in the afternoon when background noises might be 55 dBA. The third factor is related to the interference of noise with activities of individuals. In a 60 dBA environment, normal conversation would be possible while sleep might be difficult. Work activities requiring high levels of concentration may be interrupted by loud noises while activities requiring manual effort may not be interrupted to the same degree. Over time, particularly if the noises occur at predicted intervals and are expected, individuals tend to accept the noises which intrude into their lives. Attempts have been made to regulate many of these types of noises including airplane noise, factory noise, railroad noise, and highway traffic noise. In relation to highway traffic noise, methods of analysis and control have developed rapidly over the past few years. b. Noise Abatement Criteria In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are not compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria (NAC) and procedures to be used in the planning and design of highways. These abatement criteria and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned Federal reference (Title 49 23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for various land uses is presented in Table N2 (see Appendix C, page C-2). The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is the level of constant sound which, in a given situation and time period, has the same energy as does time varying sound. In other words, the fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are represented in terms of a steady noise level with the same energy content. C. Ambient Noise Levels Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the project to determine the existing background noise levels. The purpose of this noise level information was to quantify the existing acoustic environment and to provide a base for assessing the impact of noise level increases. The existing Leq noise levels along US 23B as measured at 15 meters (50 feet) from the roadway ranged from 68 to 65 dBA. The ambient measurement sites and measured exterior Leq noise levels are presented in Table N3 (see Appendix C page C-3). The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the most current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing noise levels for comparison with noise levels actually measured. The calculated existing noise levels ranged up to +2.7 dBA (average +1.1 dBA) of the measured noise levels for the locations where noise measurements were obtained. Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching" of vehicles, low traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds versus the computer's "evenly-spaced" vehicles and single vehicular speed. d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large number of variables which describe different cars driving at different speeds through a continual changing highway configuration and surrounding terrain. Due to the complexity of the problem, certain assumptions and simplifications must be made to predict highway traffic noise. The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study was the Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA (revised March, 1983). The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA- RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model uses the number and type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds, the physical characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed, elevated, etc.), receptor location and height, and, if applicable, barrier type, barrier ground elevation, and barrier top elevation. 50 In this regard, it is to be noted that only preliminary alignment was available for use in this noise analysis. This project proposes to widen US 23B to a five-lane curb and gutter section with some minor horizontal alignment improvements. Only those existing natural or man-made barriers were included in setting up the model. The roadway sections and proposed intersections were assumed to be flat and at-grade. Thus, this analysis represents the "worst-case" topographical conditions. The noise predictions made in this report are highway-related noise predictions for the traffic conditions during the year being analyzed. Peak hour design and level-of-service (LOS) C volumes were compared, and the volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were used with the anticipated posted speed limits. Hence, during all other time periods, the noise levels will be no greater than those indicated in this report. The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized in order to determine the number of land uses (by type) which would be impacted during the peak hour of the design year 2017. A land use is considered to be impacted when exposed to noise levels approaching or exceeding the FHWA noise abatement criteria and/or predicted to sustain a substantial noise increase. The basic approach was to select receptor locations such as 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 meters from the center of the near traffic lane (adaptable to both sides of the roadway). The locations of these receptors were determined by the changes in projected traffic volumes and/or the posted speed limits along the proposed project. The result of this procedure was a grid of receptor points along the project. Using this grid, noise levels were calculated for each identified receptor. The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are listed in Table N4 (see Appendix C, pages C-4 through C-6). Information included in this table consists of listings of all receptors in proximity to the project, their ambient and predicted noise levels, and the estimated noise level increase for each. e. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels either: [a] approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria (with "approach" meaning within 1 dBA of the Table N2 value), or [b] substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The NCDOT definition of substantial increase is shown in the lower portion of Table N2. Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to receptors which fall in either category. 51 In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the federal and/or state governments are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of the location of a proposed highway project will be the approval date of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document or actions, such as a Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, Record of Decision, or the Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For development occurring after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are responsible to insure that noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility. The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that are predicted to become impacted by future traffic noise is shown in Table N5 (see Appendix C, page C-7). These are noted in terms of those receptors expected to experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC or by a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. Under Title 23 CFR Part 772, there are 26 residential receptors which are anticipated to approach or exceed the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours as a result of to highway traffic noise in the project area. The maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours are less than 20 and 38 meters (67 and 127 feet), respectively, from the center of the proposed roadway. This information should assist local authorities in exercising land use control over the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local jurisdiction. For example, with the proper information on noise, the local authorities can prevent further development of incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels of an adjacent highway. Table N6 (see Appendix C, page C-8) indicates the exterior traffic noise level increases for the identified receptors in each roadway section. No receptor is expected to experience a substantial increase (considered to be 10 dBA, since existing noise levels are greater than 50 dBA) in their exterior noise level. The predicted noise level increases are from +1 to +9 dBA. The larger traffic noise increases are in the areas where the improvements to the horizontal alignment are anticipated. When real-life noises are heard, it is possible barely to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more readily noticeable. A 10 dBA change is judged by most people as a doubling or a halving of the loudness of the sound. If traffic noise impacts are predicted for buildings with permits issued before the Date of Public Knowledge, noise abatement measures to reduce or eliminate these noise impacts must be considered. 52 Highway Noise Abatement Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or vertical orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of alternative alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance between noise impacts and other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise abatement, horizontal alignment selection is primarily a matter of siting the roadway at a sufficient distance from noise sensitive areas to minimize noise impacts to those areas. However, the proposed alignment was determined based on minimizing overall environmental impacts and primarily involves widening of the existing roadway; therefore, opportunities for possible shifts in the roadway's alignment are limited. It is anticipated that no substantial increase in noise impacts will result from the implementation of either of the studied alternates. Therefore, changing the horizontal alignment was not considered as a practical noise abatement measure. 2. Traffic System Management Measures Traffic management measures which limit vehicle type, speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise abatement measures. For this project, traffic management measures are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due to their effect on the capacity and level of service on the proposed roadway. For example, lowering the traffic speed on the roadway would reduce noise impacts to the area; however, the resulting capacity and level of service for the roadway would decrease. Therefore, no traffic management measures were considered for noise abatement. 3. Noise Barriers Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can often be applied with a measurable degree of success by the application of solid mass, attenuable measures to effectively diffract, absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise emissions. Solid mass, attenuable measures may include earth berms or artificial abatement walls. 53 The project will maintain no control of access, meaning most commercial establishments and residences will have direct access connections to the proposed roadway, and all intersections will adjoin the project at grade. For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it must be high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from significant sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then becomes economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise reduction. Safety at access openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight distance is also a concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction (at least 5 dBA's, but preferably 8 dBA's), a barrier's length would normally be eight (8) times the distance from the barrier to the receptor. For example, a receptor located 15 meters (49.2 ft) from the barrier would normally require a barrier 120 meters (393.6 ft) long to provide sufficient noise reduction. An access opening of 12 meters (39.4 ft) (10 percent of the area) would limit its noise reduction to approximately 4 dBA (FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI-HEV-73-7976-1, USDOT, Chapter 5, Section 3.2, pages 5-27). In addition, businesses, churches, and other related establishments located along a particular highway normally require accessibility and high visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures for traffic noise abatement would tend to disallow these two qualities, and thus, would not be acceptable abatement measures in this case. Therefore, no noise barriers are proposed in conjunction with this project. g. "Do-Nothing" Alternative The traffic noise impacts for the "do nothing" or "no-build" alternative were also considered. If the proposed widening did not occur, six residences would experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA's NAC. Also, the receptors could anticipate experiencing an increase in exterior noise levels in the range of +2 to +3 dBA. As previously noted, it is barely possible to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. 54 h. Construction Noise The major construction elements of this project are expected to be earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passers-by and those individuals living or working near the project, can be expected particularly from paving operations and from the earth moving equipment during grading operations. However, considering the relatively short-term nature of construction noise, these impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss characteristics of nearby natural elements and man- made structures are believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive construction noise. Summ= Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not recommended, and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This evaluation completes the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23 CFR, Part 772, and unless a major project change develops, no additional reports are required for this project. 7. Air Quality Analysis Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from industrial and internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources. Other origins of common outdoor air pollution are solid waste disposal and any form of fire. The impact resulting from highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air pollution problems to improving the ambient air conditions. The traffic is the center of concern when determining the impact of a new highway facility or the improvement of an old highway facility. Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead (Pb) (listed in order of decreasing emission rate). Automobiles are considered to be the major source of CO in the project area. For this reason, most of the analysis presented is concerned with determining expected carbon monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic flow. In order to determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor closest to the highway project, two concentration components must be used: local and background. The local concentration is defined as the CO emissions from cars operating on highways in the near vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters [330 feet]) of the receptor location. The background concentration is defined by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) as the concentration of a pollutant at a point that is the result of emissions outside the local vicinity; that is, the concentration at the upwind edge of the local sources." 55 In this study, the local concentration was determined by the NCDOT Traffic Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer modeling and the background concentration was obtained from the NCDEHNR. Once the two concentration components were resolved, they were added together to determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor in question and to compare to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrogen oxides (NO). Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried into the atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Automotive emissions of HC and NO are expected to decrease in the future due to the continued installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new cars. However, regarding area-wide emissions, these technological improvements may be offset by the increasing number of cars on the transportation facilities of the area. The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide require several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone generally occur 10 to 20 kilometers (6.3 to 12.5 miles) downwind of the source of hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas as a whole are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons, not individual streets and highways. The emissions of all sources in an urban area mix together in the atmosphere, and in the presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to form ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and other photochemical oxidants. The best example of this type of air pollution is the smog which forms in Los Angeles, California. Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less than seven (7) percent of particulate matter emissions and less than two (2) percent of sulfur dioxide emissions. Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the result of non-highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural). Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from automobiles are very low, there is no reason to suspect that traffic on the project will cause air quality standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded. Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular gasoline. The burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline containing tetraethyl lead which is added by refineries to increase the octane rating of the fuel. Newer cars with catalytic converters burn unleaded gasoline eliminating lead emissions. Also, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the reduction in the lead content of leaded gasolines. The overall average lead content of gasoline in 1974 was 0.53 gram per liter. By 1989, this composite average had dropped to 0.0035 gram per liter. In the future, lead emissions are expected to decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the lead 56 content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 made the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead additives unlawful after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is not expected that traffic on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for lead to be exceeded. A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future CO concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements. "CAL3QHC - A Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadway Intersections" was used to predict the CO concentration for each of the sensitive receptors to the project. Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO concentrations consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with predicted traffic volumes, vehicle emission factors, and worst-case meteorological parameters. The traffic volumes are based on the annual average daily traffic projections. The traffic volume used for the CAL3QHC model was the highest volume within the project limits. Carbon monoxide vehicle emission factors were calculated for the years of 1997 and 2017 using the EPA publication "Mobile Source Emission Factors" and the MOBILE5A mobile source emissions computer model. The background CO concentration for the project area was estimated to be 1.8 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient CO concentration of 1.8 ppm is suitable for most suburban/rural areas. The air quality receptor for the build alternative is located on the right-of- way at a distance of 15.2 meters (50 feet) from the proposed centerline. The air quality receptor for the no-build alternative is located on the right-of-way at a distance of 9.1 meters (30 feet) from the existing centerline. The predicted one- hour CO concentrations for the build and no-build alternatives for the completion and design years of 1997 and 2017 are shown in Table 12, below. ONE-HOUR CO TABLE 12 CONCENTRATIONS (IN PARTS PER MILLION) RECEPTOR 1997 2017 BUILD 3.1 3.4 NO-BUILD 3.9 11.3 Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS (maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging period = 9 ppm) indicates no violation of these standards. Since the results of the worst-case 1-hour CO analysis for the build alternative is less than 9 ppm, it can be concluded that the 8-hour CO level does not exceed the standard. See Tables 57 Al through A4 in Appendix C (pages C-9 through C-12) for input data and output. The project is located in Haywood County, which has been determined to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Because the project is located in an attainment area, 40 CFR Part 51 is not applicable. This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area. During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be removed from the project, burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan for Air Quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Care will be taken to insure that burning will be done at the greatest practical distance from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will only be utilized under constant surveillance. Also during construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust generated by construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection and comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for air quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, and no additional reports are necessary. 8. Ha=dous Wastes/Geological Impacts A reconnaissance survey of the project corridor identified two sites which have the potential to contain underground storage tanks (UST). A records search of the DEM/Groundwater Section was conducted, and the information is provided in Appendix B. Both sites are located in the immediate project vicinity. Based on the preliminary site assessment, this project is not anticipated to impact any UST's. 9. Farmla The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction on prime and important farmland soils. Land which has been developed, or is committed to development, is exempt from the requirements of the Act. The project is located in an area zoned or planned for future urban development. Therefore, no further consideration of potential farmland impacts is required. 58 10. Construction Impacts To minimize potential effects caused by construction, the following measures, along with those already mentioned, will be enforced during the construction phase: a. All possible measures will be taken to insure that the public's health and safety will not be compromised during the movement of any materials to and from construction sites along the project and that any inconveniences imposed on the public will be kept to a minimum. b. Dust control will be exercised at all times to prevent endangering the safety and general welfare of the public and to prevent diminishing the value, utility, or appearance of any public or private properties. C. The contractor shall be required to observe and comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees, including those of the N. C. State Board of Health regarding the disposal of solid waste. All solid waste will be disposed of in accordance with the Standard Specifications of the Division of Highways. These specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Solid Waste Vector Control Section of the Division of Health Services, N. C. Department of Human Resources. d. Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas outside of the right of way and provided by the contractor, unless otherwise required by the plans or special provisions or unless disposal within the right of way is permitted by the Resident Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active public waste or disposal areas will not be permitted without prior approval by the Resident Engineer. Such approval will not be permitted when, in the opinion of the Resident Engineer, it will result in excessive siltation or pollution. e. The construction of the project is not expected to cause any serious disruptions in service to any of the utilities serving the area. Before construction is started, a preconstruction conference involving the contractor, pertinent local officials, and the Division of Highways will be held to discuss various steps to be taken during the time of construction that will minimize interruption of service. f. Prior to construction, a determination will be made regarding the need to relocate or adjust any existing utilities in the project area. A determination of whether NCDOT or the utility owner will be responsible for this work will be made at that time. 59 g. During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be disposed of by the contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan for Air Quality. Care will be taken to insure burning will be done at the greatest distance practicable from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will be performed under constant surveillance. The clearing of highway right of way and timber disposal is the responsibility of the contractor. The NCDOT's general contract for right-of-way clearing provides the opportunity for the contractor to market merchantable timber to minimize the need for piling and burning during construction. This contract also includes specifications to protect trees outside the construction limits. All timber cut during the clearing operations is the property of the contractor and shall be either removed from the project by the contractor or disposed of satisfactorily. h. The contractor will be required to perform erosion control in accordance with the project erosion constrol plans, contract, standards, and/or Standard Specifications or as requested by the Resident Engineer. These contract documents are in accordance with the erosion constrol measures outlined in the Department of Transportation's FHPM 6-7-3-1. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed and maintained in accordance with the plans. Additional measures to control erosion throughout the project will be added as necessary. i. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for use on this project, the contractor shall obtain certification from the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources that the removal of material from the borrow source will have no effect on any known district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification shall be furnished to the Resident Engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed borrow source. j. Traffic service in the immediate project area may be subjected to brief disruption during construction of the project. Every effort will be made to insure that the transportation needs of the public will be met both during and after construction. 60 V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS This project has been coordinated with the following federal, state, and local, agencies. Comments were received from the agencies marked by an asterisk (*). Advisory Council on Historic Preservation U. S. Army Corps of Engineers U. S. Department of the Interior * Fish and Wildlife Service U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Tennessee Valley Authority N. C. Department of Cultural Resources N. C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources * Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs * Division of Environmental Management (Division of Water Quality) * Division of Solid Waste Management * Division of Land Resources N. C. Department of Human Resources N. C. Department of Public Instruction N. C. Geological Survey N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission Haywood County Board of Commissioners Haywood County Planning Department Town of Waynesville A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on May 8, 1996 at the Lake Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria in Waynesville, North Carolina. Including NCDOT representatives, 73 persons attended the meeting. A copy of the press release advertising the workshop and a copy of the handout made available at the meeting are included in Appendix E (see pages E-1 through E-7). This Environmental Assessment will be provided to appropriate federal, state, and local agencies for comment. NCDOT will coordinate with pertinent agencies regarding substantive issues raised as a result of their review. Responses to comments and project- related commitments will be incorporated into subsequent documentation for this project. A public hearing will be held following the completion of this Environmental Assessment to provide more detailed information to local citizens and to receive additional comments regarding the proposed project. R-2210 A FIGURES ,isunt S, schns mm.. 77 5 PARK El^' . C reak X. CnOtr,e ` r A l l OI 0 p.I ./ seer, 17 lake J 19 V Ib1 , Lrtsl • 1 R '. l.r. af11• i. ??Ifse? 11 .... yaQSY1 J W}sprori , 23 A Sh'? HAYWOOD COUNTY ,t PI ••4 c., . urr. '?, rM Sunbwi? 27E It NAT N 1 ` 1 ` 1 ` WAYNESVILLE QUAD 1 .r errs U" 1737. • 4r./ 1171 lag 1*4k 40 ?L1KE 1Sii ? ? Br? rch r `? Ir,?ka• rf7? 1104 im- X50 ' ? I` j•? I LW4 7 nl?... re '1 O L 111E ? lIt! .G 0? r,u 172! ;. I 177?: n' /? q ti , ?4 q4 BEGIN PROJECT ?\ POP. 6,763 ' J Ir END PROJECT CULVERT ,. r•l, 1L .V 111 WeoMM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ;r2 1e 0 TRANSPORTATION 1w ? l? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PAS 11lK .ro 27 0570 BRANCH US 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) fln 1l11 111f FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSHALL STREETIWOODLAND DRIVE) TO R SOUTH OF SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD) 1u NEAR WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY e TIP NO. R-2210 A r It 111 0 KILOMETERS 0.8 0 MILES o.a FIG. 1 r- 1 \ ? I ao - 1 ?? I w la • i VZ 'JII ` '„ • 91'0 S371W "'0 SH313WO701 0 ?L _ • v OW-N 'ON JLL ` 9tz _ AJAW03 ([OOAIAVII'fl'771AS7AfAVM NVVAr / 1s (([VON MYA(I'I ANN7t') 1091 NS J0 I111109 I O.L (wAIN([ QMV'I(IOOMIIYHM.LS 'I'IVIISNVIN) 1 • EIIN17 All:) V771AVINAVAI 9,111 MOM (([vON awnA3IISv) SS3Arisau a S!1 \? 81N j lag II?NV2[ll IVLN?WNONIAN GQNV 9NINNV71 9 SAVMIIJIII AO NOISIAlU Y NOI LV,LNOdS'NV HI AO .LNdNLL1IVda(1 VNI'IOHVD 111HON 1 ,- S 9 1 ??tiaty i ° ag 1? Otl00?OH V • • N oiet ua \ oy • y I ? I • a o'•• ¦ m ° y I soaV bg y ` sat •?O Ygd? ?6. ? ? I oDy 341SANNnS epO? •• a • a o Y: . rg asnopddnolrb ai 0 • s m1 ?Ia , s N39?fl • • mm • m- A o H f N m Oy "? 4D 0/ m N '403 ?• m O l8 TIVNS! Oa a/ \ \ i itogtd / \ • am; o O 1 \ \ _ Y s m` Ny • i m pb V3W3Sdl0l/73 ' Ql. r O nap iirlOlyb Snp I is x° NIVW N 14/V?bHbVObr 1 I • ° Q, 0 700HD5 f7Nflf 3Nr773 `?? y y?6 s?ONyb NI I •• a O is 11 rNSn7 ° V `" a`obd 3NV1tlIVa 114 pH (MnH li s? nu d• Sib 0i i • , Oaa ay • J• • 7 b`` I • S13NVNd +``y .aa?? ?i O ?b m A:I i• :?•``` ?•• a ? v bbo \ g. I \ U 31 a Otl 1 ?`? Yc as .L??f02IJ ?.`?`da \ QN? .?, ?d add °d Sne ` *M dyy ' 0A0\H 4e ^ I s yyc N os YC ?o0lb sib ? d°4 3soH??? S. oa y S)I7t/M3a1S a3SOd SS3NISn8 SZ Ol S1N3W3A0HdWI a3SOd 71 HI AVMN33HO (73SOd SMI MMIS ON/l 71 dh11 AVMN33HE) ON11 GN3037 "0" / .I?tl M y o rs ? is m 6 3snoFl -' is NIVw H iunoo a? °? z £ a1d < I. 1e 78irN m -yl ?`;r _?F?1 • u S37dw.. a n? / nNtl?H01 .y 1 • • • x , D ? N F H ar ? 1S / !Jb T~ N 1VII??bly MOOTd A1100? 3J Y ?gbb a a,? f I- 1g tl y OoO .6r NJbOHO ??o `f 0 Y n >c. r OOOM • 7 O' _? 3o°lu a x a b? a JO O s Ot? ?v O Y 4,P O 3AV gAOu 40 T- • • : v \ ? ? M3tn H7yi 'l 11¦ A / r IP 1• ••`A I¦ OO ?u 1 ?, ^^aM° I• s, Za 1 li W % I I • t1\'N ? I • I d'? • •...: I 1 <0W \ • I as la • `,t, ay , bt rr?r? gVd1.0 1 girl uS 311111S3NAdM 5 1 r° d \' lg n N° 1 ? I ? / •5zt? tg, 1 n 2, ?Y ?O • /tiv I? • I IE . 9 .oa ??tns?~? •• N • o • 0 •' OR Sol" •. • • NMOlAVW • • ? YJ? ? • I ob • 1 \ I \ *?Nndtl 1?da \'a°r?\\ I 61F ' Ob / r a? ?o y ? W Q W Q ? ca N ? ?,. N 0? N O OC ' ??W? v co 10)s o o? °c z? W ?Z?" QLU m?yIt? N?oa M UM co) J Q fti yO Wco ?O J N N z 'o a Q a t y P'f y NW y y Q ljl? ao 111 zqlq 11 III A.11 1 ? ulil zo ?pW lie 11 y 11 Wy W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- z y 3V Z~ N2 M a ?L W4 8I ? N p'w? O cc WQWQ ?° y J CC C4 O Q ? N at cn??Z ?? Uj 7 Z mk 10 U. N F' C 4. caJ?1 ?O Wy N a$ m cq M h ? h 8I8 44 P L W CO ? ?J g?8 ??g o l gl? ?g co Q Q oC WO ? V Co o a ? N N N ~ Ch J W Q LU yW W? z Q °a x U Q Q W ? a TT i Z c? a D J 0 a O a ? Z N W W ? w W -? LL ? ?N ___ W W W 0 W O 7 Q JO O a Z O a N? .aaZ a a J S "' N N L O I \ I ;. ' 1 g,?e W o ?N W C ) l (l ?j f b :f IT \/ _ r f f ? ? ? ?l / sg y` in I ~? f • s ` - \ --- y ? ' - ? ._ .• ? ? ' s -?• inn-__--' .:??-°- ! ?? a? r ?j?rr+ y,4w ? 1+ Va• ??q ; ? c7v urn 't ••, "' pl? ? t?? _ esy yy. ` ? _., v . i V , 41 O co V W Q N O CJ CL y N cc cc WO E c ZLL. Z ? L W o ? a ??AA v/ CL cr. o a a ? a 3 W O a ftft 0 0 0 y m U LL. O U LL. 0 U LA. O N rr 000 0 CV z N v Z ?:-, co c'J ?- z ? 04 6 M N ? v 00 CV 01 w FW? ? 0 O LAJ US o o 0o cr. cc a ¢W U° 0 Q N W 0 a ? O ? Z ? O W W? O ? n W c? o co OaZo D Q `' a cc W Oz U m 0 Arl O? yJ 03 4 yj Op cc y 4 h O Z U O ?y z ?a y W 3 m? ? LLI co W m Q F4 O zap O ¢ a 0 x W W ~ 1 L y=J m - m O F- O W Z y0? ?hq -j N^ U3 Z '? ZV= °y y ? p0 O Q Q o c m ~ W C7?? Q yF- ..OQW Z LLj W W D? W? O 3 W W W ? :0 W U LL. .I . N q:c CcW JWN "I III W? W?ZO vQU? Z ? ?' Ill / ` ` `... _ . _"- / I/ ? ? (.... ( 1 / 11I !/Ir r ` ' / / '_ _ / , \•? / / ? ' '' 1 1 : n / ? ? ?r'?•.'?,, ?? ..? `.. Cry \\(.•.)?? 1 ( '?Y '? \o 2'80U --?.. .,- \ ????. 1 ?/ ti S ? \\ i ? ? QQ ?_ •' ? \ ? -fit [? ; It .? J.y\) ' 1, >.. .1'y `? I 1 C N O <LL ` I . 1, \!p` ?A\ U ?f "?"' / 1• '1 I + 9 MN W 'fit 1. ,, , 'o •% ? %, •,:: ?,? c •\ •'? ? _ ? , I ?„ (_) - C?,. . ? It -60 C A, W 00 ?II • • + FI '? / - • `:/ ` 1 \ O' l • rJ •C, `? • >.?T- /?- _.??`` 28 0 l r .,/ I. 1 r 1 I I J ) 1 ! / '• < v/) '/. ? ?.? i 1?y I? ; ?Z_ ? ?? ? C? ?(, 1a ? / ••/ / ? ? ? P yt,?' I I 1?? ? i'.?\ ? ? ? r? ; `f` `C J 1 I ?rt it '. I 4i :: I) ? , 1? •:?\ ? ?'•\ ? a IC, , ,? _?? .^?/ -• 1 \. -' ?\ ?.. )?%qxf +4 17 RIi r 1 ;'r ? ?V/(?/t/?'? IA • ? ?, • t /? h 1 , ?? //!? ? ; ?. ... I !l ?1 I` r ?'??? ??i' o • \ " a \?• \?f ``.?.'??i/?• • ,^ \ . ` ?4 r? 11 fp- 1 L •? ? _-` ^\.`1 ,I ? S? 71 ? ? (?y ?,J lj/Z1` 4 ? •. j I r? :1 • • ?? r \j 1.?, Ilq a / ^ ITi \ w; \ ! .:? ? ? • • , .+? ? ?• ,?; J { `!_h ? • ?1u, % ? / •,?IIQI (?/C? It rt?t iPj.+'? f? !?? \ \ ?,I? ^rt,P,? ? ,? .?.?? ? ? i, • • ? ??? al / 1 ?I 1, '?9• i\ ?'/- I ? F? ?'}?il w 1 { Y ?I),? r,\ 1 11 _ ? \\: . --?. i/: ?..: ?.??: ?/,' p„ wr .?F4 ', ( ( M O li I ?. I'(? I,? y. .1 •N?'?•?/,'? •?/ ?• i • R. 1 ?SZ?`f1t. o ! if y -\\i J ?i ••?'r ?'ti-\.???1.-' ?., "?In?i ? 1? I ' 1 t ?_.,?`/r•\••• ?\ fyl 'I.aJ' +- hy16?. J ? ?•w •\--?-'?? ?_, •. ''1 ''• - / O (7? \-?"?rl Ii ,. !'r? • ' _ '?• . i •? / +j 1! b in f I I { ,y'`•, .! 1 ? ? i / \\\ ?! -.?i ? ? I ) \ ?, i. • f \ ' ! t ?. -.. , , , f, : ..• •• 14jfrt .-1.RM(u,i - (, y 11 ?!.i.! r. ? '?'! r ? •• +I '? .I ?.`•, ? `''i • ,? r ?41? 11 t y , ?;?+ ? ? I 's ?:` • •^? `', .( / ? I ?? •...," I ?\ MAW n? • ' - CqJ . '•? • ? • ¦ • , n+I?I i?i°Q Spq;17?' PC ?, . (11 ? • .? ` l \ ?; :. 1 t " ` ( ,1 a?. 1\? ?t f `: '1 ?s ? •? 1' .,?- - • / C w,.l?(g,.,' 1 ?-•. . :...-. , ,. , ,.' - _ _ 1 'l' 1 ?:-•- _ (DTI( I, +, ,• r)j. IN 4 '? J ..J • • 1 ??'? \• ?•, ?QI ? l.? ?• ? i\?????`. J ' /• • ? I A 'i ? u\? )?fL- ??r •7/ s. J ?? :1 \ l? ?•/, ... 1 +?'•+)? •??? ? `?.. 1 ) • \..? • l?r??? rn 1fN )1, 1. jli•y __ I / l '. ? ... f /• • \ 4 f IF Ifs ? II'i Jo, ' .'.J ci 7 ? - { . lt? % ? / / ? 4? •. b 'fit "eel 77 k MOO, `.. ,yam - ? ?. /) . 1 I ? ( ) 4 ' . • F,I ` (,) .? ?;_. _ 1 "?i • ,y •Mw`'\ • t` • I, _ ".• ?? 11•.' 1•' •':l t v. ? I •? I ? , •• ?\.• f l?? / /??'>+L?( ''•? y/ ? 1i ??,•• ' •r/?irC._ I ' I' ` 1 ( • Iii G ? II ? \I w f •' '\ • r ( ' •1 • .:• • ?i;?7 a I 10, ?'\ •?. 1; ' -\-??.- ? \\ l? ? J• if ? l If ? 1 ??_ `? 1? • /' ? ?\ •. ±,,; ? .I S ? •?. ? f •? ?,l ,?? \ II' . 1•t -. !;?? /)/` ? ..?•i?? } lt• ,???jir `?n{, '•". •'.\\'? ? '.: ?\ ?'1.?•? \\'. \tl a •{??': ? - ,/i... ' \ /1 \?II?I :.i?+ i_,\., \ ? ??? !???'` ! ? .i'?•! ?'Y ' I' \ ?? ?. n I ?._• \? / IN QVIlO 1711/1S'INAVM we ,,`. / ,,•i I• _.?-"?\ /( 1. % ?_?'••? ?tl /I oru?'r )\.`, IlJ t ' 1'.O -'?!'? %? 1 ,l ,\}?:- q,tl r?? -It? ( ?.P [? '/ It ' 11_\ r r' (bn? ., 0?? ?' C A,pmU / 1 n° r Li+ Pue Iln J J•;._ ' I ' \? '//lI /-i •?If• ' / /! t `I' - •?II:? •I ( I'`,?:1. :I'1•? / I???J q, r:?•=.1!??:C - ?..+:,191tf [','..•,:.:/(: / / ..°,\_ I `? '?.? I .?• - ? •??\ +?'? •.1.t I. ?, ? _ti'? , ?? ??Itil,-i`r?-` ?--- ' f1 ??.?{ --.-J 1- 1' - _ 1 _ •? Y? / 7/\ ,?? ., ? ??I I `?) 11; 1 Si. jt, I .' ??o• !(?l) j? r ?r [ \ I YY" ,UOaId _ :\? / V?.,y?.# \\ 1 \ 1.. - j r - : i •'l• .1 t?l / !I .J•I _.! ???? `y! 11 ?? . I ? \ l 5 _ --.1 I c`?.b / ? ? / `-_' : I) • ? 1 / % 11) I ? ' • L; I . ,..1.+'?•'•; .r t . ,/, ? •? 19 (' ?/ .1 /' 1)l1 \. ;il 11' e\ _ - ? \?? •,?` t ' )/ / //,?/" ,;.• I d- i r ,t\f ? ?1 I( -/,c• . 1''I I ? ?? ?.? ? + ; II ,i ?•??n. `r :,t.,nu.l (`? ,''I f /'- ? ( ) II j ''• ??.5, II) • - - C. li,l \ hl?_ ?: r; 1T , i I! I ?I i:a l l1 1` .? 11 1)u. 11?I ---? I \ 11?? , _+ \ ? II \, :.. ll I I I ....?._ \ _. I/(, (j I ?. 'I (I ?/ r? 1 nl ,..1 I it ( !jl -?, •+! 1` .I ' tl?--,,?? 1 `' ,? ? > I I; , rj l l • '?' ? •1? \?' ?r I I I ° ? ,? ?% --l?n??• /'. 1\ II'r' 1 , ?,_.-` •. ?• \I? ' ?I i , _/ +,) I I )?ll /" •(? `' r/ ?.. /y\ I,/ A ???r'.__ . \:.s••. ( -., X11!/1 I ?•' ' ?!?._•'ll-I I \,' I I I/\\ oo2s I )'I j(. ? ?)'\\ \ °n°` \\ ('' l x?` \'' . l •• „ ? ?'' III' 7 \ ? .. ? I . .. - - I?, - ? l l r \• s \ ' _ I 1 l . II: +?' + 1 (I ;/ ? ' , I I ' II J 1 I'') IIII ?,. ` .,,??1 ? `,-,.. ,1- a,4J '. J? I/Y it fI\ +l1'\'?. ?. '• .'i ?? ?\?"er-. ,? _ ,? ?, i??, ',I\CI f ? ?) ! i ./?_a ?• 1? \ / B ra?_ 1 \,+••1 !,'I .. •?? ? f /?1a??a J? ?i , ?..- ? 1 i I/,1\1\\'•\ I) ?b . ; Y_ lilt 11 r ° 141 { tl ti I \': ,t ?` a I owe LYJ! ?1)\`1 ` I III' f l c1, I + `1 'f,l :-, I (4' ) r. \ 1. !' `•?1 ;1, 11.( ?.f'` It ?: ?' / ' l)' •I)I. (L ? f,'I.,1 \\ 1) `? in1J :? ' ? I; / I . f' •,c ?? ,) ? ;I .1 ? /, y .?q l,.`??e;?' ?/, `!? l .+`l 1? yu/ew f I ( ??, ,. -.:'? ?!' /? 'J? t •11., 1 `'dl!;i . 1 \ Ill ?1,? ooofiZ: I BOW 701 O.[ H'?/ goo `?i .1 I I.: NI'DRil 1 ?1?=-/ XX/ \ \ 01 ZZ-?I I? ?• •• 1, •..1 •1 ,q„. ,1prn41.11'•k-1?cl J ?'' o.uno,v,n.?..xt `-'`I 1'05 ,.. i ' :./j: ?? _`?Y:?`'?t •f' I,i''•.? , 1 _ u? r ' ?I?. ??? I ?y,: V;l?IV .LCI(1S L7 11'011d •,. ..I. ... ) _ ,,?/TAG.:'.( .:LI,'_tr ??. Jl... _ _'?-Ir' ___ (?'?Y t._:!. if?le. '?r'!?: ?•. u_?1,J?1/i'1.?? t - (; / r\_ ..-t ,y-/?? \'j 1t'?y- •y?:3?b?'j 11 ''F-?L I' ?St1Si•l'll`1.?, r1 ' ^ j u ! r au S ?r -_/ 7 -- I I .? I ? ?? _ r?I?bs W a • ?-_ :11_'_ 1y.c _ 'J. 1' lS1 ,\ }'?jj Jn', jl y??..\11' ii? ?_: \ Adel ?/ 1.Sv nt« ?l ti'r?7 \?7??r1 1 1 '% A- - \ 1 \ / .! ? _ ` 1.1'I •l . - ' 711M .?I .0 Y \ ?tralir? ? \ - - _ ` ?O , t - ? I?l \ . ( ' ?/ ?• / ? 1?o11o,pe? 1\ ,N .?? ? I `.` •4/]-s:? / ..? •. I I i„ ?? I v` it j )I77.[? ! [1P. [ 1 kuap,e9 J`j? )1t* -?s_ C, °. t At sell". 'aNl,}sanll!FI / /\\„ Lei'. - ` l se x!ll,..l1w !i ?,r?, set 1 • •.?? ''? a,A ps,t i I Illn)aq?eH . K c IC ° y 1 pw ) 00oo7P.1 ig 't 18 `\? t tea/ a >/ [ 'rc?? tI of /Q7j11Cp,-j. dOllllaH:,?' f 611 ( J ? :? d • ? _ t ?c 'y_ rl °? ter- \ ? s)noo h ? ? • .,., ?? ° t? a? ?' 1109 if, 1{11Q1V ?? ° ano:p a{del.l' > j I 1 ?:1QU•BUIIUWIMS / 1: ??1 II ? I)\ ? III ?? n ??y, bllS.+ \?. 1 l/ /7. __. ... r+_ -. 4a ?'.;? 4{ n, ' ? ii f ,,1/ly' I?l? ?! ?ii '1 v?'-?", ?. t?? ?\ ` `\ '?`?° p' ?_ '' .:; /(! ? - `I ?' .- d=?:,s;+' ! 1 Sf Yl'?IH ! !.i ?% ? ?,, ,(ti. ?- '} 0ti0?.v''+ii•, dl? Mo a. \. ?.n\ ? ?? .V ? 1\ _ _ ?/?V? ? II \ ? 1. ? ? /-? .51!p I`I j ? y / ? t,'?+li ? ? ret? .' 1 V ? II • ` 1 ?I _ ." I ,?\\\\ `_? ? _ !•??? ?-T,, `I ?' lf.?? 11/1 1?1 (ta ??.?'?Y? rr /?? ' • ,• %" •{ •. Vj) in 6ll L 4( N !h qe N,elo? 1 ?.< /y' r' ,1 t n _? , Il/4a. }'!? A ?q.. ? ;\F ),t? !' , Sill ' •a? tot C ! I 00 •• I ?l1 ???t/ 111;r k ? tf ?t ? ii p .?? ?' t1, '"4? ' i-.? •i/. ?l \}J ` ? 1,,? E 1?5 Z",it..... ? 1???1? °8 + O !t \??1,?,1 ' 1, 3 /i 4kL,A,"HIA ' CII? I •?.. /? '. 49 3 ` 3' r ' r `? % A lflti ) LL7 : ?1 i. 1 s'3 f ? q1l MY I'uj ? d v s1 , s'{ c ? --' .+"-- •. t p ; w ¦ ?"fi, r I ?isn[•r unr% T74? AR? I.1 o^ LZ l,J• I a7 t.'I pL ,Ci,??}+?,J.?r+'W? I,j? I? i"11?, o ,? ?1 ?r• •? 61? ?°."`°_.'__--:?=.'° ??? '\?=t,•sF;C`' ?i If ?,?.??? \. rE?rH}? l ?'..,ir l?•I.'%''.? i /? •r. \ B 1 •AA /' )'.. /r, .? e'IHUeq?? \l ; ! 4,\ \S;dtip>&,c, - t%?' T -..?? ?' rIr°•.( luai-?7ti .r /1'. \ .IIZ??•7/rny ?• tOR, '•'' I )\°1 _ IUp$1t _.\• Ill 1I? 1 ?'?t! ?\.: T,?'`.II: I /i-1?' 11 - •1 - '?/ I i . ? 011'•.. z n ' / • \, .?? :rl ''t •,'o/ /!., \ _? r, > 71 ;??:til`"••??11 ,., _C'i - :.• X111 ? (' .'?„. ??? _, i`••^^ ;°`C-i • \ t?\` t ? Jlio?fnd,a V'1 . c _ ;% . /? \ ? ?? •?•/iy-.`? 1 °y f l \ I ?? ( \U ,(, r r tl M •?'. I ..? rr1l ,,.? - 1 °i "/• P .l?C(,• rr-, ,emu n,?\1\ - _ ?O/ n O? A^- 1. .I - ;?\\ , I ??o ? ? ; / l?? ° X1;1 •?.° ?, ? -?-?'?t ,\ ::5' I j.,', ? `. l 33n? C r.. aU I I? GGol _ r¢ ii?? .' l Qt1\) / U It, ?.. (IS'`1 r? a') .41 t) al rills. \C-'?JJ' 1I1o°\ j D '?? uL ?' I•\° bolls. \`\\ 7 ) I -_ 1 ?'' 'Ip a 1 r , \ , \ ( /? / ', s I( t . 11ti1 _ i 11 r -lit \I? wo Iq?ugp'd,'` St A\ ou ap, av I(It??.? `lL If w i ° n' , \, :{ ?, :c' .ri. ?I 1L lid ? it I ?a?.? '• ??{ll? Irhl' il l1? ?(?\\\`??-? " I II '?`•; ? I I\?? ?-..? il.- luellr lu IL IV \aHoMps I,? - / `•?-f C'' ? "?? ? I ? /11 , _ I L.• i . II° i C? \ \\\' \/• `?j _ _ 1 r ?,?_\1Q1 ttA`?t?r ' t, z , i I I I R-2210 A APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE AND COMMENTS RECEIVED NT F Th United States Department of the Interior N O FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE yq H, ,0a9 Asheville Field Office \O 330 Ridgefield Court Asheville, North Carolina 28806 July 6, 1995 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways North Carolina Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: ¦ TAKES PRIDE IN AMERICA ?? Subject: Scoping for proposed widening of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, North Carolina, T.I.P. No. R-2210 In your letter of June 5, 1995 (received on June 12, 1995), you requested information regarding potential environmental impacts that could result from the subject project for your use in the preparation of an environmental assessment. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C-. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). According to information provided in your letter, this project will involve the widening of US 23 Business in Waynesville from two lanes to a five-lane facility. Additionally, improvements to the US 19-23-74 interchange will be undertaken. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is familiar with the project area, which is primarily in an urban/commercial setting. The Service provides the following information for consideration in the environmental assessment. The enclosed page identifies federally protected endangered and threatened species known from Haywood County that may occur within the area of influence of this proposed action. The legal responsibilities of a Federal agency or their designated non-Federal representative under Section 7 of the Act are on file with the Federal Highway Administration. The enclosed page also contains a list of candidate species that are currently under status review by the Service which may occur in the project impact area. Candidate species are not legally protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or-listed as endangered or threatened. We are including these species in our response in order to A-1 give you advance notification. The presence or absence of these species in the project impact area should be addressed in any environmental document prepared for this project. The Service's review of the environmental document would be greatly facilitated if the document contained the following information, if pertinent: (1) A complete analysis and comparison of the available alternatives (the build and no-build alternatives). (2) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing and required additional rights-of-way and any areas, such as borrow areas, that may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed road improvements. (3) Acreage and description of wetlands that will be filled as a consequence of the proposed road improvements. Wetlands affected by the proposed project should be mapped in accordance with the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. We recommend contacting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office (7041271-4856), to determine the need for a Section 404 Clean Water Act permit. (4) Linear feet of any water courses that will be relocated as a consequence of the proposed project. (5) Acreage of-upland habitat, by cover type, that will be eliminated because of the proposed project. (6) Description of all expected secondary and cumulative environmental impacts associated with this proposed work. (7) An analysis of the crossing structures considered (i.e., spanning structure, culverts) and the rationale for choosing the preferred structure(s). (8) A discussion on the extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat, from direct construction impacts and from secondary development impacts. (9) Mitigation measures that will be employed to avoid, eliminate, reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated with any of the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these_scoping comments and request that you continue to keep us informed as to the progress of this A-2 project. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-95-092. Si el 6?1 Brian P. Cole Field Supervisor CC: Ms. Linda Pearsall, Director, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611 Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 320 S. Garden Street, Marion, NC 28752 A-3 IN REPLY REFER TO LOG NO. 4-2-95-092 JULY 6, 1995 HAYWOOD COUNTY MAMMALS Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomvs sabrinus coloratus) - Endangered Alleghany woodrat (Neotoma magister) - Candidate Appalachian cottontail (Svlvilagus transitionalis) - Candidate* Southern rock vole (Microtus chrotorrhinus carolinensis) - Candidate BIRDS Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - Endangered Appalachian Bewick's wren (Thryomanes bewickii altus) - Candidate* Cerulean warbler (Den roi a cerulea) - Candidate* REPTILES Bog turtle (1 mm s muhlenbergii) - Candidate AMPHIBIANS Hellbender (Crvptobranchus alleganiensis) - Candidate* CLAMS Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana) - Endangered* SNAILS Engraved covert (Mesodon orestes) - Candidate INSECTS Diana fritillary butterfly (Speveria diana) - Candidate Tawny crescent butterfly (Phvcoides batesi) - Candidate PLANTS Small whorled pogonia (Is tria medeoloides) - Threatened. Rock gnome lichen (Gvmnoderma lineare) - Endangered A liverwort (Plagiochila caduciloba) - Candidate* A liverwort (Plagiochila shar ii) - Candidate* A liverwort (Plagiochila sullivantii var. sullivantii) - Candidate* A liverwort (Sphenolobopsis pearsoni) - Candidate* Butternut (Juglans cinerea) - Candidate Carolina trillium (Trillium pusillum var. pusillum) - Candidate Manhart's sedge ( r x manhartii) - Candidate Mount LeConte moss (Leptohymenium sharpii) - Candidate* Mountain catchfly (Silene ovata) - Candidate Piratebush (Buckleva distichophvlla) - Candidate Rugel's ragwort (Ru lia nudicaulis) - Candidate Tall larkspur (Delphinium exaltatum) - Candidate* Wolf's milk spurge (Euphorbia purpurea) - Candidate * Indicates no specimen from Haywood County in at least 20 years. A-4 U ... ? srnrf J North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources James B. Hunt lr*Govemor Betty Ray McCain, Secretary May 1, 1997 Nicholas L. Graf Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation 310 New Bern Avenue Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442 Re: Historic Structures Survey Report for US 23 Business from Waynesville city limits to south of SR 1801, Haywood County, R-2210, Federal Aid Project STP-236(1), State Project 8.1942901, ER 97-8933 Dear Mr. Graf: Division of Archives and History Jeffrey J. Crow, Director Thank you for your letter of April 2, 1997, transmitting the historic structures survey report by Clay Griffith concerning the above project. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited: Miller-Francis House (HW 81), 60 Asheville Road, Waynesville. The Miller- Francis House is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C as a good example of a late-nineteenth century Italianate-style dwelling built during Waynesville's boom years. It is also significant as a rare, surviving brick dwelling from the late-nineteenth century. The following properties were determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places: Welch-Byers House (HW 73), 1 Welch Farm Road, Waynesville. This house has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. Dr. H. L. McFayden House (HW 59), 1216 East Street, Waynesville. This house has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. Please note that the photograph captions for this property say "Miller House." Old Haywood County Hospital (HW 79), 1617 North Main Street, Waynesville. This hospital has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. A-5 109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 T??l Nicholas L. Graf May 1, 1997, Page 2 The report in general meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Q.ompliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. Sincerely, aBvid rook David B Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DB:slw cc: H. F 5ck B. Church Waynesville Historic Preservation Commission A-6 F°deral Aid T ?j"T?' 23R ll? TIE P", k - 22l b County H&WCOD CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS Brief Project Description wnneki DS 2 ow whuk V LLjE GITU LIMtT5 :M t:lM OF 02, 1q -2?3 - 74 lM'1yvt;M_af On 31 iqq& , representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Federal Highway Administration (F fWA) North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Other reviewed the subject project and agreed there are no effects on the National Register-listed property within the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse. there are no effects on the National Register-eligible properties located within the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse. there is an effect on the.National Register-listed property/properties within the (s) are project's area of potential effect. The property-properties and the effect listed on the reverse: there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties within the project's area of potential effect. The property/proper-Lies and effect(s) are listed on the reverse. Sinned: ?c?t? 31 19 q Cv Represen cOve, :X DOT, Historic Architectural Resources Section Date FHW or the Divisi n Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date Represent ati e, SHPO at6 S to Historic Preservation 6ffc er / v A-7 ` / Date tt?UA Federal Aid 238((\ TIP T 2-2. 10 County W Properties within area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is National Resister-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE). Properties within area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status (N-R or DE) and describe effect. M? -?a.r,ci5 Hou5t. Altzvna??? ? - -?^D?? t?lo P?dverrs?, ????ct cora?k-io??S• 1, l r1 c.1 l de v? ?re.Y,ci alo r D?- w •-) CA.A.A Pro ? r? c}i o ?s , ? . ?x¢ r C_ oar good p n Prac l+P-f nape. I - M 11 er - ?166,r c 5 ?ous e- 'P--)-7 - Acbure c_ Reason(s) why effect is not adverse (if applicable). A r rat 2 mo i f-i a r\ 5 ?ro+ex,.5 secs . .. .. Initialed: NCDOT e,K-Is ?iv%5 ri,I --o?- w? 3 f. A-8 FHWA SHPO LD n Q LZ1 C, Federal Aid n err2l> 13 () County Nay Woo CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES tf Project Description , ,5 227 P>us??a riWel WAy?JFi?/iL?.E UT`f IAMirs TP U4 11- 117 - -14 JAn?uaa. 11 I?1°1V , representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Other iewed the subject project at A scoping meeting T Historic architectural resources photograph review, session/consultation Other parties present agreed there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effect. there are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criterion Consideration G within the project's area of potential effect. ? there are properties over fifty years old (list attached) within the project's area of potential effect, but based on the historical information available and the photographs of each property, properties identified as n Kv. -0 1- 2, 10 - 14 A149 1'1 are considered not el gi le or the i ational egister and no further evaluation of them is necessary. there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effect. gned: I ti :presen , NCDOT 'Date :3wA, r the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date rate HIsforic Preservation 11 111C)40 If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included. A-9 ,\CK (?CK .? STAI(o North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Betty Ray McCain, Secretary March 14, 1996 Division of Archives and History Jeffrey J. Crow, Director Nicholas L. Graf I V IF \ Division Administrator / G Federal Highway Administration ? Department of Transportation 310 New Bern Avenue R ?9?6 Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442 MAR Re: US 23 Business from Waynesville city limits to US 19-23-74 interchange, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project STP-236111, State Project ??? NAG N?40 I- 8.1942901, TIP R-2210, ER 96-8346 & EVVIF;C Dear Mr. Graf: Thank you for your letter of February 13, 1996, transmitting the archaeological survey report by Gerold Glover concerning the above project. During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr. Glover has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this project will not involve significant archaeological resources. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. Sincerely, David Brook Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DB:slw ? cc. H. F. Vick G. Glover A-10 log East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C E H N R Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Henry M. Lancaster II, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse FROM: Melba McGee Y Environmental Review Coordinator RE: 95-0889 Scoping Improvements to US 23, Haywood County DATE: July 11, 1995 The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are for your consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to review. attachments RECEIVED J(11. 1 1 19y5 N.C. STATE CLEARINGHO!_LSE P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North CarolinA21411-7687 Telephone 919-733-4984 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Environmental Management OW James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary ED E H N R A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director July 7, 1995 TO: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs All, FROM: Monica Swihart',1Water Quality Planning SUBJECT: Project Review #95-0889; Scoping Comments - NC DOT Proposed Improvements to US 23 Business, TIP No. R-2210 The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the environmental documents prepared on the subject project: A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The stream classifications should be current. B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/ relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be revegetated. C. Number of stream crossings. D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance. E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed. F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures are not placed in wetlands. G. Wetland Impacts 1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional wetlands. 2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible? 3) Have wetland impacts been minimized? 4). Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected. 5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted. 6) Summarize the total wetland impacts. 7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from DEM. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0512 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper Melba McGee July 7, 1995 Page 2 H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM. I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as possible? Why not (if applicable)? J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques alleviate the traffic problems in the study area? K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the following: 1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. 2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation. 3. Mitigation should be in the following order: restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking. Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed by the Department. Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 10973.mem cc: Eric Galamb A-13 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Solid Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C) C F1 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C r'i William L. Meyer, Director June 20, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management FROM: Jack Butler, P.E., Environmental Engineering Supervisor?/0 Superfund Section SUBJECT: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8. 1942901, T.I.P., No. R-2210 The Superfund Section was provided the attached information concerning the subject project. Our office was asked to comment on the potential for impact on CERCLA or other inactive hazardous waste sites. According to our files, the only sites on CERCLIS or Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites inventories in the vicinity of this project are the Schulhoffer Junkyard site (NCD024852675) and the Haywood County Landfill site (NCD981474190) on the east side of Waynesville as shown on the attached map. We can foresee no apparent effects from this project on these or any other CERCLIS sites or vice versa. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Attachment JWdk/JB/MK 7 P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 A&U Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper June 23, 1995 CDBG Response To: Mike Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management From: Jimmy Carter, Chie Hazardous Waste ecti Subject: Improvments to US 23 Business / Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 T.I.P. No. R-2210 The Hazardous Waste Section has reviewed the above referenced proposal. Hazardous Waste Management Permits or approvals are not applicable to this project. Further, we have identified no hazardous waste management activities to cause environmental concerns in the vicinity considering the provision for alignment shifts. A-15 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, WAA Health and Natural Resources 4 P 0 0 Division of Solid Waste Management A" , a James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor H N F-1 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director ` June.30, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management FROM: Philip J. Prete, Head 6 Field Operations Branch Subject: Haywood County CDBG - Environmental Impact Study The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the attached project proposal and has seen no adverse impact on the surrounding community and likewise knows of no situations in the community which would affect the project. Haywood County should make every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in the development of this project where suitable. Questions should be directed to the Solid Waste Section, Jun Patterson, Waste Management Specialist, at (704) 251-6208. PJP/lcf cc: Tun Patterson P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action EmQ"6 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Solid Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F1 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director July 5, 1995 400#4 * i _i 1 14 TO: Melba McGee DEHNR Record Coordinator/planning and assessment FROM: Michael A. Kelly 14 Deputy Director SUBJECT: Haywood County CDBG-Environmental Impact Study The Solid Waste Management Division has reviewed and commented on the above-referenced project. Please find enclosed separate comments from the Hazardous Waste Section, Solid Waste Section and Superfund Section. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to contact our office. MK:tf Enclosures CC: Jimmy Carter Phil Prete Jack Butler P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-76kl Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50°X, recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Reviewing Oftice:A/e INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: /? Due ate: -yT After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Process Regional Office. T,,.,o C C C C C C C C L C C C C C C PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time limit) Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days facilities, sewer system extensions, b sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days) NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection 90.120 days permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to discharging into state surface waters construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Reply (NiA) time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later. 30 days Water Use Permit Pre application technical conference usually necessary (NIA) 7 days Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the installation of a well. 115 days) Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days) Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit. Permit to construct 8 operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.06 NIA (90 days) Any open burning associated with subject proposal must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520. Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 days NCAC 20.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group 919.733.0820. (90 days) Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.08 00. The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity An erosion 8 sedimentatio . t control plan will oe required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.) at least 30 1 20 days days before beginning activity. A fee of $30 for the first acre and $20.00 for each additional acre or art must accompany the plan (30 days) 1 The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: J (30 days) On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any area 30 days mined greater than one acre must be permited. The appropriate bond (60 days) must be received before the permit can be issued. North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day exceeds 4 days (NIA) Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day J counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (N/A) should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned." 90.120 days Oil Refining Facilities NIA (NIA) If permit required. application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days J Dam Safety Permit inspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv- ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 dAys) a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces. sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of SM.00 must ac- compan t pplication. An additional processing fee based on a percen the total pro'ect cost will be required upon completion. P? W- Continued on reverse OD?C? iIM ? State of North Carolina JUN 1 5 1995 Department of Environment, Health, and Natural esources Division of Land Resources Y James G. Martin, Governor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Charles H. Gardner William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director Project Number: County: t-1A y t--.ar:.o Project Name: Lf.S• 23. BUS. Iq¢z90 TIP `W P,-ZZld Geodetic Survey This project will impact _!geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box' 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 (919) 733-3836. Intentional destruction of a geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4. This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers. Other (comments attached) For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at (919) 733-3836. Reviewer Date Erosion and Sedimentation Control No comment This projeclt will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more than one (1) acre will be disturbed. _ If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part of the erosion and sedimentation control plan. If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management, increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply. The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission. other (comments attached) For more information contact the Land Quality Section at (919) 733-4574. • ? G/lG /9S Reviewer Date A-19 P.O. Box 27687 • Melgh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone (919) 733-3833 An Fnual Ooonrnmlh, A/firmarfv#- Art1nn FmnlnvPr ® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carol ina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs ept Vnvirom-nent, Health, & Natural Resources FROM: j David Yow, District 9 Habitat Biologist Habitat Conservation Program DATE: July 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Request for information for transportation improvements to US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, North Carolina, OLIA Project No. 95-0889, TIP No. R- 2210. This memorandum responds to a request from Mr. H. Franklin Vick of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the proposed project, and our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The proposed work involves improvements to an existing urban thoroughfare. The NCWRC supports such improvements over development of new roadway corridors. However, we encourage the NCDOT to work with local planners in retaining the transportation utility of the improved roadway through management of access. Direct impacts of roadway widening may include loss of wetland and upland wildlife habitat and channelization or sedimentation of trout streams and coolwater fish habitat. In addition to the specific concerns mentioned above, the NCWRC offers the following list of general recommendations and informational needs: 1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern species. When practicable, potential borrow areas to be used for project construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated animal and plant species can be developed through consultation with: A-20 95-0889 Memo Page 2 July 11, 1995 The Natural Heritage Program N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, N. C. 27611 (919) 733-7795 and, Cecil C. Frost, Coordinator NCDA Plant Conservation Program P. 0. Box 27647 Raleigh, N. C. 27611 (919) 733-3610 2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. 3. Project map identifying wetland areas. Identification of wetlands may be accomplished through coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the COE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria listed. 4. Description of project activities that will occur within wetlands, such as fill or channel alteration. Acreages of wetlands impacted by alternative project designs should be listed. 5. Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities. 6. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands and uplands). 7. Any measures proposed to avoid or reduce impacts of the project or to mitigate unavoidable habitat losses. 8. A list of document preparers which shows each individual's professional background and qualifications. It is the policy of the NCWRC that impacts to wetlands be avoided. Non-wetland and non-riparian alternatives should be examined during project design. Where wetland losses are unavoidable, the NCWRC will recommend mitigation of the losses. To avoid or minimize wetland impacts, we offer several general recommendations. Crossings of wetlands and streams should be minimized and located at narrow areas and made perpendicular to the stream. Any disturbed wetland areas should be returned to original soils and contours. Plant communities should be re-established which would result in plant community succession into habitat of equal or greater value than that which was destroyed. Relocation of stream channels should be avoided. Because Haywood County is a "trout water county" under administration of Nationwide and General 404 permits by the Corps of Engineers, the NCWRC will review designs of all wetland and stream crossings at the time of permitting. A-2.1 95-0889 Memo Page 3 July 11, 1995 Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your office, please contact me at (704) 274-3646. cc: Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Section Mgr. Janice Nicholls, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Xichael Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT A-22 j / ® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission ? 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT FROM: Mark S. Davis, Western Mountain Region Coordinator /??? Habitat Conservation Program DATE: May 19, 1997 SUBJECT: Request for information for transportation improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Road), from the Waynesville Town Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), near Waynesville, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8.1942901, TIP No. R- 2210 A. This memorandum responds to a request by you for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the proposed project, and an onsite investigation was conducted on May 15, 1997, for the purpose of assessing construction impacts on wildlife and fisheries resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The proposed project consists of widening the existing two-lane shoulder facility in an area of extensive commercial development. The NCWRC supports such improvements over development of new roadway corridors. Project impacts to fish and wildlife habitat is primarily related to Raccoon Creek and associated wetlands. Trout waters are not involved, but the NCWRC is concerned about sedimentation and potential impacts to aquatic resources in Raccoon Creek and Lake Junaluska, which lies downstream of the project site. In addition to the specific concerns mentioned above, the NCWRC recommends that the following information be included in the 404 permit application: Description of project activities that will occur within any streams or wetlands. 2. Type of new crossing structure to be utilized at Raccoon Creek, e.g., reinforced concrete box culvert, CUT, or a spanning structure. If concrete is used at stream crossing, we recommend that adequate precautions be taken to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Uncured concrete affects water quality and is toxic to fish and other organisms. A-23 TIP No. R-2210 A Page 2 May 19, 1997 Because Haywood County is recognized as a "trout water county" by the Corps of Engineers, the NCWRC will review any Nationwide or General 404 permits for this project. While we do not anticipate modification of the project because of trout waters, we will evaluate the extent to which the project design avoids and minimizes impacts to surface waters. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your office, please contact me at (704) 452-2546. A-24 Haywood County Planning Department Courthouse Annex III 2200 Asheville Road Waynesville, NC 28786 (704) 452-6632 December 20, 1995 Mr. Whit Webb, Manager N.C.D.O.T. Program Development Branch P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Whit, I would like to receive your guidance on how to proceed with a concern in Haywood County. Highway 23, the old road between Asheville and Waynesville, is scheduled to be widened from a two-lane to a five-lane road. The Chairman of the County Commissioners received a letter from Mr. Franklin Vick giving us preliminary information about the project, and gave Mr. Michael Paylor as the contact person. Right now, there is no sidewalk along the part of 23 that will be widened, and the road is so narrow with so many curves that there is barely room to walk on the shoulder. Along the path of the project, there is an elementary school, two county office buildings that house the Health Department, Building Inspections, Environmental Health, Addressing, Planning, and Erosion Control. Where the widening project will end is the new Lowe's store (the largest in the region) and just past Lowe's is the high school. Wal-Mart is located one- 0 0 fourth of a mile from Lowe's, and Lake Junaluska (the regional Methodist conference center and a popular place to walk) is located one-half mile from Wal-Mart. This is certainly an area where many people would be likely to walk if it were safe. Where the road has been widened, closer to Waynesville, there is a sidewalk on both sides of the street. I called i?Ir. Paylor to discuss my concerns with him. He was most helpful when I called, and said that he would pass along the request for a bike lane to the appropriate DOT office. He also said that the issue of sidewalks was more complicated because we are a county government, not a municipality. He explained that the current policy is to request the municipality to contribute to the cost of the sidewalk on a proportional basis, depending on population; there is no procedure established for counties. I have discussed this matter with Jack Horton, the County Manager. He would like me to pursue the issue with the County Commissioners, but first we need a cost estimate for our share. Would it be possible to establish a new formula for counties, based on the population of the closest municipality to the road project? A-25 Mr. Whit Web Page Two December 20, 1995 It is quite possible that the County Commissioners will vote not to participate in the funding. In the first place this issue has never come up before, and in the second they are also attempting to fund a new sewer line. They may feel that construction of the sewer line is more important than a sidewalk and bike lane. However, I would like to at least raise this issue as a possibility. Perhaps in the future if the opportunity were to present itself again, more thought would be given to a sidewalk. This issue is very important to me for several reasons. In addition to the obvious ones ac of safety, fitness and the environment, I was involved in an accident 15 years ao in Boston when I was riding my bike on the sidewalk. I was badly injured when I was hit head on by a car who jumped the curb. I have had two operations on my knees but have never fully recovered. I live in constant pain and am limited in what I can do. I want to do all 1 can to ensure that we have a safe world for cyclists and pedestrians. Thank you for your help. Best wishes for happy holidays and joy in the new year. Sincerely, G' Faust Planning Director c: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer A-26 tWAY"NESVII1E '• Xtw_ OFFICE OF MAYOR Town of Waynesville June 28, 1995 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning & Environmental Branch N.C.D.O.T. P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611-5201 CE/ IUL 0 z 1995 z r 2 DIVISIO!4 OF 2V bf1GHWgyS g cc,L??RONME Pa' Subject: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project NO. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 Dear Mr. Vick: The majority of the aforementioned project will take place in the one mile extraterritorial land use jurisdiction of Waynesville which extends on the west side of US 23 Business to the High Tech Center and on the east side of US 23 Business to Carolina Power and Light's substation property. The project will have the greatest impact on Waynesville's Sign Ordinance and the Flood Hazard Reduction Ordinance. Several nonconforming signs exist along the edges of US 23 Business. The legal, nonconforming signs exist on private property and they are nonconforming because they are "off premise" signs which are prohibited by Section 154.083-1 of the Town of Waynesville Code of Ordinances. If the nonconforming signs are removed due to road widening activities, a sign permit cannot be issued for the relocation of the illegal, "off premise" signs. The Flood Hazard Reduction Ordinance prohibits any encroachments or fill material in the 10 year floodway unless a registered P.E. can certify that the encroachments or fill material will not create an increase in the base flood discharge. The proposed highway project runs parallel to Raccoon Creek which is included as part of the Town's official flood maps. The Town should receive copies of the drawings pertaining to the road widening activities to determine compliance with floodplain ordinances. A-27 POB C-100. 106 SOUTH MAIN ST, WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 - PHONE (704) 456.3515 Mr. H. Franklin Vick 06-28-95 Page 2 I appreciate the notification of the proposed project and if the Town can be of any assistance, please contact me. If you have questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact John Swift at (704) 452-0401. Sincerely, Henry B. Foy Mayor HBF:pm A-28 POB C-100. 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 • PHONE (704) 456.3515 \of WAYNESVIIIE OFFICE OF TOWN MANAGER Town of Waynesville July 22, 1996 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmenial Branch Division of Highways Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: EC? e?2` - On June 17, 1996, we received your letter regarding the Town's desire to have sidewalks included in the project for improvements to U.S. Route 23 east of the Waynesville Town Limits. Your letter asked that we respond by July 2, 1996. The letter came at our busiest time of the year, as we were completing the 1996-1997 budget, closing out the 1995-1996 fiscal year, preparing a Community Development Block Grant application and dealing with three different law suits. We simply have not been able to address the extensive requirements in DOT's Pedestrian Policy Guidelines, and it will be mid-August before our small staff will have it done. I wanted to write you to explain the delay in our responding and to assure you that my failure to respond in the brief time allotted should not be viewed as a decline in the Town's interest in seeing sidewalks constructed as a part of this project. My Town Board remains very interested in seeing sidewalks included on the west side of the road for at least a portion of the distance the project covers. There are numerous homes along the west side and the children in these homes need the sidewalk to access Junaluska School. Please do not take any action which would eliminate the sidewalk from consideration. We will make every attempt to complete the work involved in Pedestrian Policy Guidelines as rapidly as possible, and I will try to have it in your hands by August 15. 1 would again apologize for the delay in responding. Sincerely, G Y A. Lee Galloway Town Manager A-29 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786.0100 - PHONE (704) 456-3515 G\ WAYNESVIO E Town of Waynesville August 12, 1996 H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: 0 AUG 1 9 1996 D-IVIgICN '? ., iNib?• Subject: US 23 Business (Asheville Rd.) From the Waynesville Town Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1).State Project No. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 On June 7, 1996, the Town received your letter along with the NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines. We, at the Town of Waynesville, would like to thank you for taking the time to review this vital project. The following criteria are evaluated to demonstrate the need for a sidewalk along the Asheville Road project from the existing sidewalk at the town limits to Howell Mill Road on the northern west margin. Local Pedestrian Policy Attached is a zoning map of the project area. Two thirds of the proposed sidewalk road frontage is zoned residential. Much of the existing route is old strip commercial zoning which is no longer the policy of the Town. We prefer to cluster commercial zones at the intersections (Howell Mill and Ratcliff Cove Roads) and to maintain the residential character of the neighborhoods of Hillside Terrace, Sims Circle, Meadowood and Monte Vista Drive. The proposed sidewalk ties the two commercial areas to the school and the residential neighborhoods to facilitate pedestrian travel. Local Government or Local Sponsor Commitment Waynesville and Haywood County will assume responsibility of maintaining the sidewalk. When the Town annexes the area, the Town will assume responsibility of maintaining the sidewalk. The Pigeon River Fund has donated $7,800 to continue development of a multi-use trail (the Richland Creek Greenway Trail) from Lake Junaluska to the Waynesville Recreation Park which will form the core of pedestrian facility commitment by the Town, the County, Lake Junaluska Assembly and the Richland Creek Action Committee. A-30 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 - PHONE (704) 456.3515 H. Franklin Vick 08-12-96 Page 2 Continuity and Integration Upon completion of the project, the new sidewalk along with the local Richland Creek Greenway will provide an integrated system of pedestrian facilities. The Richland Creek Greenway Trail connects Lake Junaluska Assembly with the Town of Waynesville's Recreation Facilities and sidewalks along city streets. The proposed sidewalk along Asheville Road will connect neighborhoods and school facilities to the Greenway Trail from North Main Street and again at Howell Mill Road. The Little Champion Fitness Trail already exists along the Greenway Trail near the end of the sidewalk at Howell Mill Road. See the attached map for locations of existing and proposed Greenway Trail and pedestrian facilities. Generators This sidewalk will serve as a primary access for those children attending Junaluska Elementary School. At the current point in time, these children are unable to walk along the street due to the unsafe conditions of the area in front of the school. This poses a huge problem since many children live so close to the school but must be bussed in due to the adverse conditions. Less buses could be used if sidewalks were put in. See photographs attached. Safety The presence of the elementary school and the school system baseball and softball fields (also used for soccer fields during other seasons) means a great number of children will use the sidewalk. Existing or Projected Traffic Projected usage of the facility will exceed 150 pedestrians per 24 hour period along the corridor based on school enrollments, recreation fields, Fitness Trail access and access to the Richland Creek Greenway Trail. With future commercial development at Ratcliff Cove Road, pedestrian travel could further increase. Your assistance and consideration is appreciated. Do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 456-4410 if questions or comments arise. This pedestrian facility is important to the Town and the County. Sincerel rederick Ba er, P.E. Director of Public Works/Utilities FLB:pm Attachments A-31 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 - PHONE (704) 456-3515 R-2210 A APPENDIX B GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY f STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GARRETT JR. GowmoR SECS rARY January 10, 1996 STATE PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210) COUNTY: Haywood DESCRIPTION: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Frank Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch ATTENTION: Mr. M' el Paylo FROM: Gr , GeoEnvlronmental Supervisor Geotechnical Unit SUBJECT: Addendum to Geology & Hazardous Materials Evaluation Site #1. Parcel # 212 -- John K. & Betty O. Reeves Property Site #2. Parcel # 148 -- David & Linda Blevins Site #3. Parcel # 114 -- Clarence Allen Shelton Property Attached for your review is a copy of the "Preliminary Site Assessment" report. This report was prepared for the NCDOT Geotechnical Unit by Front Royal Environmental Services, Incorporated. Two of the sites were previously covered in the original Geology and Hazardous Materials Evaluation report dated February 11, 1994. Quality Auto Service was not in this original report. All are included here because additional work was performed. A brief description of each site is as follows: Site #1 Parcel #212 -- John K & Betty O. Reeves ProneM, (Quality Auto Parts): This former gas station is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of US 19- 23-74 and US 23 B (Old Asheville Road) on the north side of access road SR 1375. The business is now operated as an auto parts dealer and garage. According to an employee at the facility, all the underground storage tanks (USTs) at this site were removed approximately five years ago. Front Royal conducted a survey of the site and did not locate any tanks. Three of five samples from the former UST pit area contained petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of state action levels. B-1 Mr. Frank Vick January 10, 1996 Page 2 Site #2 Parcel #148 David and Linda Blevins (Exxon Gas N Groceries #1)• This gas station is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of US 23B (Old Asheville Road) and SR 1196. According to the DEM database, this facility (ID # 0- 010999) has three (3) fiberglass (FPR) gasoline USTs (two 10,000 and one 8,000 gallon), two (2) FPR diesel USTs (8,006 and 2,000 gallon) and one (1) FPR kerosene UST (2,000 gallon) on the premises. All six USTs were installed on April 19, 1988. The tanks are approximately 81 feet from the centerline of US 23B and approximately 18 feet from the centerline of SR 1196. Front Royal collected four soil samples adjacent to the tank-bed areas and the associated pump island. Only one of these samples contained contamination above the detection limit. Sample SB-9 contained 22.3 parts per million (ppm) diesel for EPA Method 3550. Front Royal prepared a Site Sensitivity Evaluation (SSE) for the property, which indicated a final cleanup level of 160 parts per million (ppm). Proposed right-of way only affects the pump island, but if any improvements are made to the Y-line SR 1196 the tank bed will probably be impacted. Site #3 Parcel #114 -- Clarence Allen Shelton (- too Inc.): This gas station is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of US 23B (Old Asheville Road) and SR 1250 (Sims Circle Road). Mr. Shelton, the current property owner, said he witnessed removal of the underground storage tanks (USTs) from the site approximately two and a half years ago. There was evidence of tank removal approximately 46 feet from the center line of US 23B. Front Royal conducted a survey of the site and did not locate any tanks. A tank closure report could not be located from the DEM-Groundwater Section for this work. Front Royal collected two soil samples from the former tank pit area. None of the samples contained contamination above state action levels. Roadway design should avoid Site #1 since there is confirmed contamination on this site. If this property is acquired by DOT, the department could potentially be held liable for proper cleanup and remediation of it. If the site cannot be avoided, the Geotechnical Unit will make recommendations on it once the Roadway Design Unit has provided us with plans showing the proposed right-of-way. Please contact Gene Tarascio at (919) 250-4088, if you have any questions or comments concerning these recommendations. GAS/ET Enclosure cc: Sandra Stepney, Roadway Design Unit B-2 R-2210 A APPENDIX C HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE AND CONSTRUCTION NOISE/ AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS TABLES TABLE N1 HEARING: SOUNDS BOMBARDING US DAILY 140 Shotgun blast, jet 30 m away at takeoff PAIN Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR PAIN THRESHOLD 130 Firecrackers 120 Severe thunder, pneumatic jackhammer Hockey crowd Amplified rock music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD 110 Textile loom 100 Subway train, elevated train, farm tractor Power lawn mower, newspaper press Heavy city traffic, noisy factory LOUD 90 D Diesel truck 65 kmph 15 m away E 80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal C Average factory, vacuum cleaner I Passenger car 80 kmph 15 m away MODERATELY LOUD B 70 g Quiet typewriter L 60 Singing birds, window air-conditioner S Quiet automobile Normal conversation, average office QUIET 50 Household refrigerator Quiet office VERY QUIET 40 Average home 30 Dripping faucet Whisper 1.5 m away 20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves AVERAGE PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING Whisper JUST AUDIBLE 10 0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING Sources: World Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body, Encyclopedia Americana, "Industrial Noise and Hearing Conversation" by J. B. Ollshifskl and E. R. Harford (Researched by N. Jane Hunt and published in the Chicago Tribune in an illustrated graphic by Tam Heinz.) C-1 TABLE N2 NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA) Activity Category Leq(h) Description of Activity Category A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public (Exterior) need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, (Exterior) hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above. (Exterior) D -- Undeveloped lands E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and (Interior) auditoriums. Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA) Existing Noise Level Increase in dBA from Existing Noise in Leq(h) Levels to Future Noise Levels <50 > 15 >50 >10 Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines. C-2 TABLE N3 SITE AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS (Leq) US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project A 8.1942901 , TIP M R-2210 NOISE LEVEL LOCATION DESCRIPTION (dBA) 1. US 23 Business 300m SW of SR 1818 Grassy 65 2. US 23 Business @ Haywood Christian Paved 68 3. US 23 Business @ Blossman Gas Inc. Gravel 65 I Notet The ambient noise level sites were measured at 15 meters from the center of the nearest lane of traffic. C-3 TABLE N4 , 1/3 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville.City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project M 8.1942901, TIP A R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVEL ID# LAND USE CATEGORY .......... .....a...... NAME DISTANCE(m) ................. LEVEL ..... NAME ..... DISTANCE(m) ............ -L- -Y- MAXIMUM ...............r........ INCREASE ........ From Beginning of Project (Waynesvil le City Limits) to SR 1191 1 Business C US 23 BUS 22.0 L 62 US 23 BUS 25.0 L - - 67 + 5 2 Business C " 15.0 L 65 " 20.0 L - - 69 + 4 3 Business C " 14.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 4 Business C " 13.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 5 Business C " 15.0 R 65 " 29.0 R - - 66 + 1 6 Business C " 35.0 R 59 " 35.0 R - - 65 + 6 7 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 19.0 L - - * 69 + 6 8 Residence B " 47.0 L 57 " 36.0 L - - 65 + 8 9 Residence B. " 40.0 L 58 " 26.0 L - - * 67 + 9 " 61 " 15.0 L ------------------- R/W----------- -- 10 Residence B 28.0 L 11 Residence B " 16.0 L 64 " 3.0 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- " 63 " 0 9 L -------------------R/W----------- -- 12 Residence B 21.0 L . 13 Residence B " 35.0 L 59 " 23.0 L - - * 68 + 9 14 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 11.0 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- 15 Residence B " 30.0 L 60 " 22.0 L - - * 68 + 8 16 Residence B " 42.0 L 57 " 35.0 L - - 65 + 8 17 Residence B " 23.0 L 62 " 23.0 L - - * 68 + 6 18 Residence B " 14.0 L 65 " 16.0 L - - * 70 + 5 19 Residence B " 19.0 L 63 " 24.0 L - - * 68 + 5 20 Residence B " 130.0 L 60 35.0 L - - 65 + 5 21 Residence B " 16.0 L 64 " 20.0 L - - * 69 + 5 22 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 30.0 L - - * 66 + 5 23 Residence B 16.0 L 64 " 20.0 L - - " 69 + 5 24 Business C " 32.0 R 60 " 27.0 R - - 67 + 7 25 Business C " 32.0 R 60 " 27'0 R - 67 + 7 26 Business C " 26.0 R 61 " 23.0 R - - 68 + 7 27 Business C " 13.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 28 Church E " 14.0 L 65/40 " 18.0 L - - 70/45 + 5/5 29 Residence B " 14.0 L 65 " 18.0 L - - It 70 + 5 30 Residence B " 36.0 L 59 " 37.0 L - - 64 + 5 NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/ interior (58/48). * ?> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772). C-4 TABLE N4 2/3 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Ha ywood County State Project / 8.1942901, TIP N R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVE L IDI LAND USE CATEGORY ...................... NAME DISTANCE(m) ................. LEVEL ..... NAME DISTANCE(m) ................. -L- -Y- MAXIMUM ........................ INCREASE ........ From SR 1191 (Francis St reet) to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) 31 Residence B US 23 BUS 24.0 L 62 US 23 BUS 25.0 L - - * 67 + 5 32 Residence B " 45.0 L 57 " 46.0 L - - 62 + 5 33 Residence B " 23.0 L 62 '• 35.0 L - - 65 + 3 34 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 25.0 L - - * 67 + 6 35 Residence B " 46.0 L 57 '• 49.0 L - - 62 + 5 36 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 24.0 L - - * 68 + 5 37 Residence B " 45.0 L 57 " 49.0 L - - 62 + 5 38 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 25.0 L - - * 67 + 6 39 Residence B " 26.0 L 61 " 29.0 L - - * 66 + 5 40 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 25.0 L - - " 67 + 6 41 Business C " 19.0 R 63 " 19.0 R - - 69 + 6 " 62 0 " 7 L -------------------R/W---- --------- 42 Residence B 24.0 L . 43 Residence B " 35.0 L 59 " 31.0 L - - It 66 + 7 44 Business C " 20.0 L 63 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 4 45 Business C " 15.0 L 65 It 20.0 L - - 69 + 4 46 Business C " 20.0 L 63 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 4 47 Business C " 25.0 R 61 It 17.0 R - - 70 + 9 48 Business C " 20.0 L 63 It 35.0 L - - 65 + 2 49 Residence B " 24.0 L 62 " 50.0 L - - 61 - 1 50 Residence B 34.0 L 59 It 50.0 L - - 61 + 2 51 Business C " 25.0 L 61 it 20.0 L - - 69 + 8 52 Residence B " 34.0 R 59 " 40.0 R - - 64 + 5 53 Residence B " 23.0 R 62 30.0 R - - * 66 + 4 54 Residence B " 20.0 R 63 to 25.0 R - - * 67 + 4 55 Residence B " 21.0 R 63 " 26.0 R - - * 67 + 4 56 Business C " 22.0 R 62 " 26.0 R - - 67 + 5 57 Business C " 24.0 L 62 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 5 58 Business C " 17.0 L 64 It 21.0 L - - 69 + 5 59 Residence B It 27.0 R 61 " 20.0 R - - " 69 + 8 60 Business C It 14.0 R 65 to 10.0 R -------------------R/W --- -------- -- 60a Residence B It 36.0 R 59 " 30.0 R - - * 66 + 7 60b Business C to 35.0 R 59 to 31.0 R - - 66 + 7 NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). * -> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772). C-5 TABLE N4 FBWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project # 8.1942901, TIP / R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS ID# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) -L- -Y- MAXIMUM ...................... ................. ..... ................. ........................ From SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) To End of Project 61 Business C US 23 BUS 45.0 R 57 62 Residence B " 34.0 L 59 63 Residence B " 46.0 L 57 64 Residence B " 26.0 L 61 65 Business C " 16.0 R 64 66 Business C " 16.0 R 64 67 Business C " 15.0 L 65 68 Business C " 14.0 L 65 US 23 BUS 45.0 R 11 30.0 L 30.0 L 20.0 L 21.0 R 20.0 R " 10.0 L 10.0 L 3/3 NOISE LEVEL INCREASE - - 62 + 5 - - to 66 + 7 - - * 66 + 9 - - to 69 + 8 - - 69 + 5 - - 69 + 5 -------------------R/W--- ---------- -------------------R/W--- ---------- NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). to -> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772). C-6 TABLE N5 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US.23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project M 8.1942901, TIP M R-2210 Maximum Predicted Contour Approximate Number of Impacted Leq Noise Levels Distances Receptors According to dBA (Maximum) Title 23 CFR Part 772 Description 15 m 30 m 60 m 72 dBA 67 dBA A B C D E 1. From Beg. of Project to SR 1191/SR 1818 69 65 59 <15 m 28 m 0 11 0 0 0 2. From SR 1191 to SR 1267 68 64 58 <14 m 25 m 0 12 0 0 0 3. From SR 1267 to SR 1801 71 67 61 17 m 35 m 0 3 0 0 0 4. From SR 1801 to US 19-23-74 71 67 62 20 m 38 m 0 0 0 0 0 5. From US 19-23-74 to End of Project 69 65 59 <15 m 28 m 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 0 26 0 0 0 I NOTES - 1. 15m, 30m, and 60m distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane. 2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway. C-7 TABLE N6 TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project A 8.1942901, TIP N R-2210 RECEPTOR EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Substantial Impacts Due Noise Level to Both Section <.0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >- 25 Increases(1) Criteria(2) 1. From Beg. of Project to 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 1191/SR 1818 2. From SR 1191/SR 1818 to 1 9 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 1267 3. From SR 1267 to SR 1801 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. From SR 1801 to US 19-23-74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5. From US 19-23-74 to End of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project TOTALS 1 11 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) As defined by only a substantial increase (See bottom of Table N2). (2) As defined by both criteria in Table N2 C-8 r TABLE Al CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 1997, Build PAGE 1 SITE 6 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES - --------------- - - ------- - - -- VS - .0 CM/S - - VD - .0 CM/S ZO - 106. CM U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM LINK VARIABLES - - - ---- -- ----- LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) " LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE ---------------------- " X1 Y1 X2 --"------------------------- Y2 ' (M) ---------------'----------- (D9G) ------ (G/MI) ------------------- (M) ---- (M) (VEH) ------------------ 1. Far Lane Link ' 10.8 -805.0 10.8 805.0 " 1610. 360. AG 850. 20.1 .0 13.2 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 " 1610. 180. AG 650. 20.1 .0 13.2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ • COORDINATES (M) RECEPTOR " X Y Z " ------------------------- "-------------------------------------" 1. R/W, 15.2 m From CL * -9.8 .0 1.8 " MODEL RESULTS ------------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND " CONCENTRATION ANGLE " (PPM) (DEGR)" REC1 MAX " 3.1 DEGR. " 12 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.10 PPM AT 12 DEGREES FROM REC1 . C-9 'K TABLE A2 PAGE 2 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 2017, Build ZO - 108. CM ATIM - 60. MINUTES , MM - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM -------- LINK DESCRIPTION LINK COORDINATES • " X1 Y1 X2 (M) " LENGTH Y2 * (M) BRG k TYPE (DEG) VPH EF (G/MI) H (M) W V/C QUEUE (M) (VEH) ----- ----------- --------------- ---- ------------- 1. Far Lane Link 2. Near Lane Link 10.8 805.0 " .0 805.0 10.8 .0 805.0 " 1610. -805.0 * 1610. 360. AG 180. AG 1470. 14.8 1470. 14.8 .0 .0 13.2 13.2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ • COORDINATES (M) " RECEPTOR * X Y Z --------- ----------------------------------------------------- 1. R/W, 15.2 m From CL • -9.8 .0 1.8 " MODEL RESULTS ------------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND " CONCENTRATION ANGLE " (PPM) (DEGR)" REC1 MAX " 3.4 DEGR. " 8 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.40 PPM AT 8 DEGREES FROM REC1 . C-10 TABLE A3 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 1997, No-Build ZO - 108. CM ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM PAGE 3 LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) " LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE • X1 Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------R------ -------------------- -------------- "-- ----_---- ---------- -------------- ------ ----------------- 1. Far Lane Link • 3.6 -805.0 3.6 805.0 " 1610. 360. AG . 850. 27.1 .0 9.6 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 * 1610. 180. AG 850. 27.1 .0 9.6 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES -------------- RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) " RECEPTOR " X Y Z " ------------------------- "-------------------------------------' 1. R/W, 9.1 m From CL " -7.3 .0 1.8 * MODEL RESULTS ------------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND " CONCENTRATION ANGLE R (PPM) (DEGR)" REC1 MAX • 3.9 DEGR. " 8 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.90 PPM AT 8 DEGREES FROM REC1 C-11 A 1 TABLE A4 PAGE 4 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 2017, No-Build SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S ZO - 108. CM U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) " LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE " X1 Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) (DtG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------ "---------------------------------------- "---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Far Lane Link " 3.6 -805.0 3.6 805.0 * 1610. 360. AG 1470. 71.9 .0 9.6 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 • 1610. 180. AG 1470. 71.9 .0 9.6 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) " RECEPTOR * X Y Z " -------------------------*-------------------------------------• 1. R/W, 9.1 m From CL * -7.3 .0 1.8 * MODEL RESULTS ----1-------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with mama maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 i MAX * 11.3 DECR. * 10 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 11.30 PPM AT 10 DEGREES FROM REC1 . C-12 R-2210 A APPENDIX D RELOCATION REPORT AND DISCUSSION OF DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS II RELOCATION REPORT II REVISED El E.I.S. CORRIDOR E] DESIGN North Carolina Department of Transportation ARPA-.RELOCATION OFFICE PROJECT: 8.1942901 ' COUNTY Haywood Alternate ` 1-- of 1 Alternate I.D. NO.: i R-2210 F.A. PROJECT STP-23-B 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: US 23 Business From the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 ESTIMATED DI$PLACEES INCOME LEVEL Type of I i I ! Displacees Owners Tenants i Total Minorities 0-15M ! 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M I 50 UP Residential I 4 0! 4 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 Businesses 3 1 4 7 0 VALUE OF DWELLING OSS DWELLING AVAILABLE Farms ! 0 1 0 0 0 Owners ; Tenants For Sale For Rent Non-Profit ! 0 0; 0 0 0-20nt 0 SO-150 ! 0 0-e0n, 0 5 0-150 0 ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nt i 0 ; 150-250 , 0 20.40nt 1 150-250 0 Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70mt ! 1 250.400 ! 0 40-70nt 3 250-400 2 X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70.100M 1 3 . 400-600 0 70-10cm 7 400-600 1 X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 up 1 0 i 600 UP 0 100 up : 10 600 up 0 displaceMent? TOTAL 4 0 21 3 X j 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number) project? X i 4. WIII any business be displaced? If so, indicate size, type, estimated number of See attached sheet. employees, minorities, etc. 1 X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? 6. Source for available housing (list). X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? j X 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. families? X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? j X 11. Is public housing available? X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing available during relocation period? X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within financial means? X ; 14. Are suitable business sites available (list _ source). 15. Number months estimated to complete RELOCATION? 12 MONTHS 1 Q? REVISED 7 JO 10-29-96 - / -y?- Relocation Aaent Date Approved b Date hOrn1 15.4 Kevlsea uzm a Original & 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent 2 Copy Area Relocation Office D-1 R-2210 8.1942901 Haywood 3. Will not be disrupted due to the project. 4. A. Arrowwood Products, Waynesville, N. C., custom cabinetry & refinishing, 704/452-4452, 2 employees, 1,500-1,600 SF, no minorities. B. Seay's Motor Court, 1 office, 2 duplex units, 1,500 SF, kitchenettes, one employee. No minorities. C. Mary's Fashions, etc., 1,000 SF, one employee, sells women's clothing, etc. D. The Stitchery, alternations, one employee, 1,200 SF E. Suburban Propane, propane cylinders exchanged, 2,800 SF, 2 employees, sale of gas appliances. No minorities. F. Waynesville Family Practice Center, PA., occupied by 7 doctors, 6,600 SI , 16 employees. No minorities. G. One-story frame business, Craftshop, 700 SF, 1 employee. No minorities. 6. Century 21-Great Smokies Realty, Waynesville, N. C. Telephone 456-5227; Homes & Land of Haywood County; newspaper and Real Estate Weekly. 8. As necessary in accordance with State law. 12. From information received from source for available housing (No. 6), DSS housing will be available during relocation period. 14. Suitable business sites will be available during relocation period. Source same as for available housing (No. 6). NOTE: 1. A building under construction at corner of Woodland Drive and Main Street. 2. In reference to the Family Practice Center, there are no available buildings in the project area for rent or sale at this time. This may be a problem at the time of relocation if they are not owners of the subject property and have funds to rebuild. D-2 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement housing will be available prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of relocation: * Relocation Assistance, * Relocation Moving Payments, and * Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement. With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes, apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs. The Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost, or to lose a favorable financing arrangement (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or the Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are eligible and qualify, and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify. The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS- 133-5 through 133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose. The relocation officer will determine the needs of displace families, individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance advisory services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for negotiations and possession or replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and sanitary standards. The displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after the NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displaced persons will be offered in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial means of the families and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non- profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement property. D-3 All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing, (2) rental of replacement housing, either public or private, or (3) moving existing owner- occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location. The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit organizations and farm operations acquired for a highway project. Under the Replacement Program for Owners, the NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest expenses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement housing payments, increased payments, and incidental expenses may not exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort Housing provision. A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses, on the purchase of a replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the state determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250. It is the policy of the state that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state or federally-assisted construction projects unless and until comparable replacement housing has been offered or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as income for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act or any other federal law. Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the state so that decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided. Adequate replacement housing will be available for all relocatees. Last Resort housing will be considered if the financial situation of tenants or owners warrant such action. D-4 R-2210 A APPENDIX E CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP PRESS RELEASE AND CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP HANDOUT NOTICE OF A CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PROPOSED WIDENING/IMPROVEMENTS OF US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF THE US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE Project 8.1942901 R-2210 Haywood County A citizens informational workshop will be held on Wednesday, May 8, 1996 in the Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria located at 2301 Asheville Road near Waynesville. This will be an informal open-house workshop conducted between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Those wishing to attend may do so at their convenience during these hours. The purpose of this informational workshop is to present information, answer questions, and receive comments during the early design stages of the proposed widening/improvements of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to north of the US 19-23-74 interchange. The project proposes to widen the existing roadway to multi-lanes. Representatives of the Department of Transportation will be available to discuss the proposed project with those attending. Anyone desiring additional information about the- workshop may contact Mr. Michael Paylor, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Planning and Environmental Branch, P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611 or by telephone at (919) 733-7844 - Extension 231. NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to participate in the workshop. To receive special services, please call Mr. Paylor at the above number to give adequate notice prior to the date of the workshop. E-1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Planning and Environmental Branch T14 rc-3 US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 HAYWOOD COUNTY T.I.P. NUMBER R-2210 MAY 8, 1996 Citizens Informational Workshop E-2 CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 ' WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STP-23B(1) STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1942901 Purpose of the Citizens Informational Workshop The purpose of the citizens informational workshop is to involve the public in the project planning process. If you have comments or suggestions about the proposed improvements described in this handout, please let a representative of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) know. A comment sheet is provided for you to write your questions or concerns so that we can keep a record of and fully consider your ideas, comments, and suggestions. The NCDOT realizes individuals living close to a proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the project on their homes and businesses. However, exact information is not available at this stage of the planning process. Additional design work is necessary before the actual right-of-way limits can be established. More detailed information will be available at a later date. Written comments on this project may be left with NCDOT representatives at the citizens informational workshop or submitted through the mail. If additional information is needed or you would like to submit comments after the citizens informational workshop, please address your requests and comments to: Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 A summary regarding NCDOT's public involvement and project planning process is attached for your information. Description and Purpose of the Project The North Carolina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) 1996-2002 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) proposes to widen and improve US 23 Business to a multi-lane facility from the Waynesville City Limits to north of US 19-23-74; some ramp realignment at the US 19-23-74 interchange is included in the proposal (see attached Figure 1). It is anticipated that approximately 100 feet of right of way will be needed to accommodate the improvements to US 23 Business. The length of E-3 the proposed project is approximately 2.3 miles. The purpose of the project is to provide a safer facility that allows expedient traffic flow for motorists in the area. Project Schedule and Cost The schedule for right-of-way acquisition and construction of US 23 Business, as well as current cost estimates based on preliminary design, are summarized below: PROJECT SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST PROJECT STAGE PROGRAM SCHEDULE CURRENT COST RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FY 1998 $ 2,200,000 CONSTRUCTION FY 2000 $5,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 7,300,000 Current Status Currently, planning and environmental studies for the improvements to US 23 Business are in progress. The environmental assessment is scheduled to be completed in September, 1996. A public hearing for the project is anticipated in the winter of 1997. The improvements currently under study are described below. Proposed Improvements The NCDOT proposes to widen existing US 23 Business to a five-lane, curb and gutter roadway from the Waynesville City Limits to the vicinity of SR 1267 (see Figure 1). The proposed roadway section is shown in Figure 2. Improvements to the existing roadway, including resurfacing, are proposed from SR 1267 to north of the US 19-23-74 interchange; additionally, some ramp realignments are proposed at the US-19-23-74 interchange. The provision of pedestrian facilities along US 23 Business is also being evaluated. Anticipated Right-of-Way Impacts The proposed widening of US 23 Business will require approximately 100 feet of right-of-way width and may necessitate the relocation of residences in some areas along the project. However, until both environmental studies and preliminary designs are completed, specific right-of-way impacts to individual properties cannot be determined. Anticipated impacts to individual properties will be presented at the public hearing, tentatively scheduled for the winter of 1997. E-4 _ - surlrn lc6 ? . "Owl 3133 IS 77' 1 PARK 4! 6 L C e reek + ' .4 CreDtree ?? `?. A 6 I OS 06 7 peen 276 dp6e 3 19 V Ilpy 7 loop 7 / 4 7 • \ Srrn ellw0o -Glyde' an[I 11 • ayn SVI 7F I 13 •? ' r H?7 woo Vpoorod Snnh6 e? M, I purloo6 ?PI AH 3 i $40 6^ ruf •? 6w ? SunDws 176 •? 17'. NAT I ` 1771 ° ' L9KE ter. o ' SUN Brunch ABU lp luna1 w6oAc 1 o 1206 'lob 15D o7 174 o n y !IL •? 71 7 .15 Ill ?• ,/ 1v 111 j, CS 1729, 1 S 1235 I ~ ? 'r lI7L ?'v t= . 131] w? ? 152E ? a 1!D ? ltt9 141?y lf3i i ? END \_. PROJECT .9;, BEGIN PROJECT HA YWOOD COUNTY O WAYNESVILLE QUAD 11 1323 IUAe r1i 1l01 im 1992\" im p9 s.73 Bi:abplh ' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF <R s Oloppl r TRANSPORTATION ... UK DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ;.•:;f Iu ?? u1 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 71 s7 py /D BRANCH AYNESVILLE `?>_?,?'s easy a US 23 BUSINESS 1 °S FROM WAYNESITLLE CITY LIMITS Pop. a,7g3 TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE >'' 121e ,, Lll HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 t`<:1 .17 t '.' 119 0 KILOMETERS 0.6 0 MILE 0.5 FIG. 1 Z 0 cn U W Z w u) J ? O U N C\1 N >- F- cr. w0 0 0 ZU- F- Z F L ! W CL 0 2 ?- LIJ W ` 0 0 0- 0 a. I _ a 0 2 U' m 0 o_ O M VJ m Q D U LL O w U O F- w U m LO O T 0 W O m CL O m ,r ao N v ~ o- N co O N ?- d; v Cl w F- m C) 00 0- z o< m a m Q U ? le- - T T Co Cf) CV) ' --+ ---? N ? N O T N 7 N Z O W W N a ? (3 a9 z p- P: O Cl) w m (O Q W F- 0 ~ O C'3 CL z O Z it a a co a: U 0 w OQ a W Om a p v w z O z U O \ Z W < a w O > F- Z _ D W U) W M w a a 0 O C7 O J J_ Z Q o ) X W F- w w z w m J (n Z) F- LL W T- J m O F- Cr N Z O O w 0 U) D F= < Q L~l cn ? Z U J O = U) O rt w ¢ LL L6 w F- Z ui W 0 w 0 T Q ~O Q LL (n U) O 4 v Q 1: F- T- F- D O U ? o o z COMMENT SHEET PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF THE US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 MAY 8, 1996 (You do not have to answer all the questions on these sheets, but please take the time to qive us your comments and concerns regarding this project. Please continue any responses on the back of this sheet.) NAME: ADDRESS: COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND/OR QUESTIONS REGARDING PROJECT R-2210: WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONM- TO THE QUESTIONS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES. WAS THE PROJECT ADEQUATELY EXPLAINED TO YOU? WERE NCDOT REPRESENTATIVES UNDERSTANDABLE AND CLEAR IN THEIR EXPLANATIONS? PLEASE EXPLAIN. WERE DISPLAY MAPS EASY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND? PLEASE EXPLAIN. WERE NCDOT REPRESENTATIVES COURTEOUS AND HELPFUL? PLEASE EXPLAIN. HOW MIGHT WE BETTER PRESENT PROPOSED PROJECTS AND ADDRESS CITIZEN'S CONCERNS IN FUTURE INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOPS? HOW DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THIS MEETING TODAY? DO YOU FEEL THE MEETING WAS ADEQUATELY PUBLICIZED? PLEASE EXPLAIN. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS: THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS RELATE TO TRANSPORTATION IN YOUR AREA AND NORTH CAROLINA IN GENERAL. WHAT IS YOUR AREA'S MOST PRESSING TRANSPORTATION NEED? WHAT IS NORTH CAROLINA'S MOST PRESSING TRANSPORTATION NEED? E6 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONDITION OF THE ROADS IN YOUR AREA? GOOD FAIR POOR WHY? WHAT ROAD IN YOUR AREA NEEDS THE MOST IMPROVEMENT? WHY? HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONDITION OF THE ROADS IN NORTH CAROLINA? GOOD FAIR POOR WHY? WHAT ROAD IN NORTH CAROLINA NEEDS THE MOST IMPROVEMENT? WHY? DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS REGARDING ANY TRANSPORTATION RELATED SUBJECT? Additional comments can be sent to Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager of the Planning and Environmental Branch, North Carolina Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611. E-7 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP OAT a ? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVER ATION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL ? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS )/FOR YOUR INFORMATION ? PLEASE ANSWER *rmol"OR YOUR COMMENTS ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: r 1 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. R. SAMUEL HUNT I I I G(?VIIRNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGI 1, N.C. 27011-5201 SPC10 1ARv June 5, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager' Planning and Environmental] Bran SUBJECT: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has begun studying the proposed improvements to US 23 Business. The project is included in the 1995-2001 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 1998 and construction in fiscal year 2000. The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls for widening the existing two-lane roadway to a five-lane section within the proposed corridor. The proposal for five lanes will allow storage in a continuous center lane for traffic making left turns. In addition, improvements to the US 19-23-74 interchange at the northern project terminal include ramp and service road reconfigurations and realignments. These improvements to US 23 Business are anticipated to improve the capacity of the facility and decrease the accident potential. In areas where hazardous materials involvement and/or railroad impacts occur for widening along the existing facility, consideration may be given to alignment shifts away from the hazardous materials and/or the railroad, but within the project corridor. We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a federally funded Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond by July 20, 1995 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this docu- ment. If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at (919) 733-7842, Extension 231. HFV/plr Attachment 9 1 Mount Sterling • • • -' • . 20 ?.Alift., T U/NI'Ill At $ 1.9 ` sus ? 5 (PARK 6 \ C. f reek \ Crabtree A 6 l OI O eagle 7 ake J / 19 V Hay , n : n 74 1. Ilwoo lYOe al ayn still I I 0 wMoel 23 ?s4 Sprlh, .00 J t% ./? av PI AM A' .0 6. "?r" rus 000 ' 1y Sunb.s 276 ? 1 ? 12 NAT 1 ` 1 ` ° AO LIKE f` 1 _-?J(?N9 D Brunch W D \ SUS, ki 'r? n fC4 Junalu?ka ?o 150 <7 ? / .?? l?l h Y o ?w J P7 J712 ?I j? 's o5 a ' u.? o? l n vv ;,1 N f HAYWOOD COUNTY I WAYNESVILLE QUAD .97 BEGIN PROJECT 221 as 1? /AYNESVILLE '<'.>.;.?"15 POP. 6,769 ?'ai; s , I" 1979 W y -•? L"Uy `' 1eQ9 1126. 14AC 1O 15 1fL L911 trii + .?e END J "m. PROJECT! l JJ? 1 ?'- Eli-b.rh 1y Ch.p.l Y 107 ink 0\ 4 Irl MTS 21 ? s ll IZL 11102, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 0 MILE 1/e FIG. 1 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary D E H N F=1 A. Preston Howard, Jr., P,E„ Director July 7, 1995 TO: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs FROM: Monica Swihart', Water Quality Planning SUBJECT: Project Review #95-0889; Scoping Comments - NC DOT Proposed Improvements to US 23 Business, TIP No. R-2210 The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the environmental documents prepared on the subject project: A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The stream classifications should be current. B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/ relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be revegetated. C. Number of stream crossings. D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance. E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed. F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures are not placed in wetlands. G. Wetland Impacts 1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional wetlands. 2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible? 3) Have wetland impacts been minimized? 4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected. 5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted. 6) Summarize the total wetland impacts. 7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from DEM. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper Melba McGee July 7, 1995 Page 2 H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM. I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as possible? Why not (if applicable) ? J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques alleviate the traffic problems in the study area? K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the following: 1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. 2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation. 3. Mitigation should be in the following order: restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking. Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed by the Department. Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 10973.mem cc: Eric Galamb ? RF?Fi?F? V 1 I?s q4 ?vS'C?FNCFS 1 f N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP. DATE ? NOTE AND PILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL 1I ? NOTE AND SEE ME ASOUT THIS, ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION ? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS' 1 ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? -SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND R?P4111T COMMENTS: •'l 4 r ? Ate _: F f: STATE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 1PANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. R. SAMUEL HUNT I I I GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY May 31, 1995 RECEIVED JUN 0 21995 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb DEM - DEHNR, 6th-f-tgor FROM: Michael L. Paylor Project Planning SUBJECT: US 23 Business from ne Wadi lle City Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-236(1), State Project No. 8.1942901, TIP No. R-2210 A rescoping meeting was held on May 23, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. in the Planning and Environmental Conference Room (Room 470). The purpose of the meeting was to review proposals for the project that were developed during the initial scoping meeting (held September 28, 1993), discuss revisions regarding the project, and to determine the scope of the project. The following people were in attendance at the meeting: Debbie Bevin Ramesh Fofaria Ray Moore Jerry Snead Shea Bolick Keith Johnston Don Wilson Don Sellers Greg Brew Gabrielle Chianese Don Adams Trice Lambert Barry Shapiro Julie A. Hunkins Michael L. Paylor SHPO Structure Design Structure Design Hydraulics Hydraulics Photogrammetry Location and Surveys Right of Way Roadway Design Geotechnical Unit Traffic Engineering Rail Division Signals and Geometrics Planning and Environmental Planning and Environmental 2 4 2 May 31, 1995 Page 2 Following a brief description of the proposed project, including the current TIP schedule and a review of topics considered during initial scoping, these major points were discussed: 1. Improvements to the US 19-23-74 interchange have been added to the project scope. It is anticipated that these interchange improvements will result in two business relocations. Because of this, the cost of right-of-way acquisition is likely to increase over current TIP cost. 2. The Roadway Design Branch will provide preliminary designs by February, 1996. A Citizens Informational Workshop will be scheduled by the Planning and Environmental Branch upon receipt of the preliminary design information. Roadway Design will be provided as much preliminary information as possible regarding the presence of hazardous materials, underground storage tanks (UST'S), and historic architectural resources. This is to insure, if possible, that these areas will be avoided during the development of preliminary designs. 3. The Geotechnical Unit will submit updated information regarding the presence of hazardous materials along the project. The US 23 Business/US 19-23-74 interchange has not been surveyed for hazardous materials because it has been recently added to the project scope. The Geotechnical Unit has requested a map showing the proposed improvements to the interchange. 4. Although no properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places have been identified within the project study area, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) recommends both an architectural survey and an archaeological survey. 5. Raccoon Creek, located approximately 410 meters (1370 feet) south of SR 1196 (East Howell Mills), is a Class B creek (used for recreation). The Division of Environmental Management (DEM) recommends High Quality Water (HQW) sedimentation and erosion control measures be implemented for this project. According to the Hydraulics Unit, the existing culvert at Raccoon Creek is undersized and will require replacement. The Hydraulics Unit recommends widening to the west of the existing alignment to preserve the regulatory floodplain, which is located on the east side of US 23 Business in the vicinity of SR 1191 (Francis Street) and Ratcliff Cove Road. 6. Although it is proposed to improve US 23 Business to a five-lane, curb and gutter section, it had been decided during initial scoping that no widening of US 23 Business would be necessary on the following segments of roadway: US 23 Business from the vicinity of Eas roadway), and US 23 Business from north of SR 1267 to undivided roadway) the Waynesville City Limits northward to t Street (currently a four-lane undivided approximately 450 meters (1500 feet) US 19-23-74 (currently a three-lane r May 31, 1995 Page 3 During rescoping, it was determined that project studies should include widening the above segments. Several cross sections will be considered and evaluated as alternatives. A decision regarding the necessity and practicality of widening will be made after cost estimates have been completed, business impacts have been assessed, and capacity analyses for each segment has been performed. 7. If possible, widening along US 23 Business will occur away from the Southern Railway, located west of the existing alignment, where the railroad closely parallels existing US 23 Business. MLP/wp N. C. DEPARTMENT 'OF TRANSPORTATION DATE I P k%.;. LIMY ?.. ? NOT[ AND FILL ? PER OUR CORVERSA?ION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO Mt ? PER YOUR -REQUEST ' ? RETURN WITH MORR DETAILS FOR YOUR AFPROVA4 ? ? NOTE AND {[t M[ AAOUT THIS - ?, ? ( F OR YOUR INFORMATION ? ? FLEA{[ ANSWER L? tl?OR YOUR COMMENTIi ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE _ ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ?INV[STIOAT[ AND AECORT. COMMENTS: ,? . - ?*",,??#S , ? ? ? i ? ??L? ? 'fry. c •. k? a.. _ ;?_ ? . v . STATE STAVFL OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNK JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GOVT RNOt P.O. BOX 25201, RAITIGI 1, N.C. 27611-5201 April 19, 1995 R. SAWIT VIM] I I I SRAI 1AKY RECEIVED OR Z 61995 E, RomW,N^qHSCIf/VCFS MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Z SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8.1942901, TIP I.D. No. R-2210 Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. Initially, a scoping meeting was held for this project on September 28, 1995. However, it is felt that possible scope and alignment changes warrant another meeting. A scoping meeting for this project is scheduled for May 23, 1995 at 10:00 A. M. in the Planning and Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 434). You may provide us with your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date. Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842, Ext. 231. MLP/plr 23 Attachment n" yd .J 0 ??'-• Mount.. \, .i' - . S,.,I mQ 6i 1.? -- •-. _. Mi Sr..lnp '., Av secs ?` `,f^' \ 15 1 PARK 6 L Cove reek „t6• ? / d CreDtree A 6 I 07 06 Dig e i sie 216 w , s :, , t n: J X19 ;' \ S•.. ell•oodl L LlyOet a - 7DFF 0000 • / I I Wayn svi 5 , Wpoerow • 23 Ftl:yer SM,?, \ 1eunook PI AH $.0 6 `^ rue • ? _? Sunburs 276 NAT 1 ? 1 ? ? 1 ? 1 777 R l ' ! ) h ak i° ` ?-7 ? ? /? ti 17LZ ? 5o 77 1194 !2 19 Ult q u: 71 .1, 371 ? ? '? ?s 05 1 ll71 . L(n +? S Y L z ?d ,. • 1.79 BEGIN PROJECT Sr. y 71 '.?? h1eQe a WAYNESVILLE j5 ea ` POP. 6,765 ! r ' a !v+ L1LQ?d v ?z HAYWOOD COUNTY ?NJ ?7? `? 11 krAr _ -am s 142t LL4 1 M1 LLii i '377. END 194 PROJECT ` I I 15J PA .97 q -? Y \ 1l93 , Ie97. ? 13!e EII=ob.M 15 CAap.l ?7 1544 FAS 0\ o .]7 05 A N L1.11 US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO US 19-23-74 HAYWOOD COUNTY R-2210 FIG. 1 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH PROJECT SCOPING SHEET Date APRIL 18. 1995 Revision Date Project Development Stage Programming Planning X Design TIP # R-221 Q State Project # 8.1942901 F.A. Project # STP-23B(1) Division FOURTEEN County HAYWOOD Route(s) US 23 BUSINESS Functional Classification RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR Length 3.7 KM (2.3 MILES) Purpose of Project INCREASE SAFETY AND CAPACITY OF EXISTING US 23 BUSINESS AND IMPROVF THE I FVFI OF cFRVICF FOR f'I IRRFNT AND DFSIGN YFAR TRAFFIC. Description of Project (including specific limits) and major elements of work: WIDEN US 23 BUSINESS TO AN UNDIVIDED FIVE-LANE CURB AND GUTTER SECTION FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO US 19-231-74 WITH SOME INTERCHANGE RAMP REALIGNMENT. Type of environmental document to be prepared: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental Study Schedule: FA - SEPT 96 FONSI - MAY 97 Will there be special funding participation by municipality, developers, or other8 Yes No X If yes, by whom and amount: ($) , or (9'0) How and when will this be paid2 PROJECT SCOPING SHEET 1 !_1 _.._.. _....!..1 L__.1. ...__ _...1_ _._ __.:1__ _.J !?.._1_._.__?.-• ...L!.V ....I _l _.21..1 ..-1 PROJECT SCOPING SHEET Type of Access Control: Full Partial None X Number of Interchanges I- Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 1 Typical Section: Existing VARIABLE (5-LANE C&G 2-LANE SHOULDER 3-LANE C&G) Proposed FIVE LANE 64-FOOT CURB AND GUTTER SECTION Traffic (ADT): Current Design Year % TTST % Duals Design Standards Applicable: AASHTO X 3R Design Speed: 80 KM/H (}50 MPH) Current Cost Estimate: Construction Cost (including engineering and contingencies)....... $ 4 45Q,000 Right of Way (including relocation, utilities, and acquisition) ........ $__ 2 900 Q00 Force Account Items ........................................................................... $ Preliminary Engineering ...................................................................... $ TOTAL PLANNING COST ESTIMATE ........................................... $-A 6250 nn0 TIP Cost Estimate: Construction ........................................................................................ $ 3,450,000 Right of Way ........................................................................................ $ 2,200.000 Prior Years Cost .................................................................................... $ TOTAL TIP COST ESTIMATE ........................................................ 1 5,650,000 ITEMS REQUIRED (X1 COMMENTS COST If 31? Drainage Safety Enhancement ..................................................... $ --.Roadside Safety Enhancement ..................................................... $ --Realignment for Safety Upgrade .................................................. $- ,-.Pavement Markings ?Paint ................................................................................................. $. Y hermoplastic ................................................................................. $ --X--Raised Pavement Markers ............................................................ $ 2 n ?Delineators ................................................................................................ Other (clearing, grubbing, misc., and mob.) ....................................... $. 1,.=-3,n.00 CONTRACT COST Subtotal .............................................. $ .1 ox nn Engineering & Contingencies ........................................................................... $ 469,00 PE Costs ............................................................................................................... S Force Account .................................................................................................... $ Subtotal ............................................... q? A AAA npn Right-of-Way Will contain within existing R/W? Yes No Existing Width New R/W needed Estimated Cost .......................... Easements: Type Width Estimated Cost .......................... $ Utilities ........................................................................................................ $ Right-of-Way Subtotal ..................................................................... $-. Total Estimated Cost .......................... $ Prepared by: Dmc' Dnfw ? -d.9A The above scoping has been reviewed and approved by: InI Date IolL Date Highway Design B.O.T. Member Roadway Mgr Program & Policy Structure Chief Engineer- Precon Design Services D44,Q -6 -444- Chief Engineer- Op Geotechnical Sec Roads Officer Hydraulics Construction Branch Loc. & Surveys Roadside Environ. Photogrammetry Maintenance Branch Prel. Est. Engr. Bridge Maintenance Ping & Environ. Statewide Planning Intl. Right of Way R/W Utilities Traffic Engr. Project Management County Manager City/ Municipality PROJECT SCOPING SHEET Date Division Engineer Biciycle Coordinator Program Development FHWA Dept. of Cult. Res. DEHNR (Scoping Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineering.) 1121 Date *If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping, note your proposed revisions or comments here: NOTICE ON PROPOSED Project 6.911010 OF AN OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVEMENTS TO NO 69 FROM U$ 64-74 TO THE GEORGIA STATE IpINE R-2110 Cherokee County The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the above open house public hearing on October 21, 1995 ketween the hours of 4:00 pm and 8:00 pm at the Cherokee County Courthouse Annex in Murphy. Interested individuals may attend this hearing at their convenience between the above stated hours. Division of Highways personnel will be available to provide information, answer questions, and take comments regarding this project. Under this project, it is proposed to widen NC 60 to a 24 ft. roadway with 0 ft. shoulders. Some realignment of the roadway is proposed to reduce curvature and improve sight distance. Additional right of way and the relocation of some homes will be required as a part of the project. Anyone desiring additional information may contact Mr. C. B. Goode, Jr., P. E. at P. O. Box 252Q.1, Raleigh, NC 27611 or phone (919)250- 4092. NCDOT will provide reasonable accommodations, auxiliary aids and services for any qualified disabled person interested in attending the hearing. To request the above you may call Mr. Goode at the above number no later than seven days prior to the date of the workshop. N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, SLOG. FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. ACTION ? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL ? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS FOR YOUR INFORMATION / ? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: n ?q OCT - 61993 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT II I GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 2$201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-$201 SECRETARY October 4, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor FROM: Michael L. Paylo Project Planning Wne-r' SUBJECT: Widening of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1); State Project No. 8.1942901; TIP No. R-2210 A scoping meeting was held on September 28, 1993 in the Planning and Environmental Conference Room. The purpose of the meeting was to determine the scope of the project and determine recommendations concerning the project. The following people were in attendance at the meeting: Mark A. Cole Traffic Control Ray Moore Structure Design Jerry Snead Hydraulics Paul Koch Statewide Planning Danny Rogers Program Development Greg Brew Roadway Design Sandra Stepney Roadway Design Eric Galamb DEM Jack Matthews Photogrammetry Don Wilson Location and Surveys Betty C. Yancey Right of Way Robin Stancil DCR-SHPO Boniface Madu Signal and Geometric Joseph Foutz Planning and Environmental Michael L. Paylor Planning and Environmental After opening the meeting with a brief description of the proposed project including the current TIP schedule and funds available, the following major points were discussed: 1. Representatives from the Planning and Environmental Branch and the Roadway Design Branch discussed schedule changes for the environmental assessment document, which is currently due to be completed in September, 1994. It has been determined that this N October 4, 1993 Page 2 due date will be delayed one year (to September, 1995) to accommodate the 1994-2000 TIP change of the right-of-way acquisition date. 2. Robin Stancil of SHPO gave a recommendation for an archaeological survey for two sites along the project. Ms. Stancil also named three potentially historic properties: the Welch House; the Miller House; and the Miller-Francis House. These properties are not listed on the National Register, and may not actually be in existence on the project. 3. Eric Galamb of DEM stated that Raccoon Creek is a Class B creek, (used for recreation) and recommended Type A erosion control measures during construction. 4. Jerry Snead of Hydraulics stated that the culvert at Raccoon Creek is undersized and will need to be enlarged. Mr. Snead also recommended that the widening of US 23 Business occur away from the regulatory floodplain on the west side of US 23 Business (in the vicinity of Ratcliff Cove Road). Mr. Galamb is also in favor of preserving the floodplain. 5. There were concerns on potential underground storage tanks (UST's) along the project. The Geotechnical Unit has identified several sites, and would have to initiate further studies to determine the impacts of these UST's on the project. 6. Because there will be no turning traffic between SR 1801 (Francis Farm Road) and the Lake Junaluska Animal Hospital, Danny Rogers of Program Development suggested that the widening to five lanes not begin until the alignment approaches the area of the Lake Junaluska Animal Hospital. MP/plr N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE REP. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. / I y/ / ACTION ? NOTE AND FILE ? PER 9UR CONVERSATION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL ? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS OR YOUR INFORMATION ? PLEASE ANSWER . rrrOR YOUR COMMENTS ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: n M SUTF u STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GOVERNOR RO. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 August 26, 1993 3 `1 (-r J /If JG 0 1993 >>ll!i_ii flj R. SAMUEL. HUNT II I SECRF FARY r- 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor FROM: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental B nch 9 SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for Proposed Improvements to US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1); State Project No. 8.1942901; TIP No. R-2210 Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this project is scheduled for September 28, 1993 at 9:30 A. M. in the Planning and Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date. Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842. MP/pl r Attachment qp m Zoo ??,' ? `? ' l v??. cc cc i00 M '??. (. (?Y'? ?'`? ?' (/? Gam,, C(? /? V '. _ r - x Mount ' F' ' ti' lll57 r 5-'-9 -ke Se J3 7 ?S PARK 'nom Core creek C fh i cotes .e- ?,- A 6)I I Or OS D? Mseve 276 Csk l r J 19 Valley I June s g \ Svvv ellwoo 2 .,Clyde) Can?( WayngS l NS I I e , / ?' ...a t r wooaro: .? H`z woo ISpn?l /? . P \ munooh PI A ,; ?.iJ 1 / j Sunbu'ss Ky?E? :1 ? 1j'S NAT? 1 1 ? 1 ? r \? 1 -- ( /Jranch V - La 27 1? 174! < fl; 19 Qllve , 4? 119! ? JI 1]e] rJ \ i 1 ri ? a Oy I?ld '?' ? 119) _ ,ye I Lvv ? 1 ?5 9 fl'7-r- ?e1 ?1 oS Ilya 74 h I1s1 i `? I]oo '? .]S ?' ?'+ Poad 71$4 F Lou jo ' 11 I ?33 r ? 'gyp n ` BEGIN 1\ ol 0'. 1.07 PROJECT -' I U120 °? kld.. Ijv .? ?? La 1 ?S `89 J 111 v A. r NFU 13 IIOi 1101 /i Nor,h / ,,> h ? r ej WAYNESVILLE S POP. 6,765 y 1112 1 I r II 1110 f]7d? HAYWOOD COUNTY 17]] " ' .? - Ltr.r ?' y ?] FA's y,IS11_ ? /'? 1176 Ierg/ b 1P2E I? ?5 iv71 v]] END PROJECT 0 I eQL 19]9 \ 11? Eli:pbelh ' Uapsl '? ?Oev I$'- MS 7 05 /p .9, LE47\l? LI44 ,P CN NORTH CAROLINA Dls'PARTNIF,NI' OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMI?NTAL BRANCH US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO US 19-23-74 HAYWOOD COUNTY R-2210 FIG. 1 1149 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP _ o ( _ z--93 TO• REP. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. T rµ ./ ^/ FRO / REP. NO. O g ROOM, BLDG. 7 ? ' // / r y ACT ION ? NOTE AND FILE ? PER 9UR CONVERSATION ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUHST ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL ? NOTE AND SHE ME ABOUT THIS OR YOUR INFORMATION ? PLEASE ANSWER OR YOUR COMMENTS ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: ?-ate I, PROJECT SLOPING SHEET Date -September 2, 1993 Revision Date Project Development Stage Programming Planning X Design TIP # R-2210 Project # 8.1301401 F.A. Project # STP-48(1) Division Fourteen County Haywood Route US 23 Business Functional Classification Rural MaJor Collector Length 3.7 kilometers Purpose of Project: INCREASE CAPACITY AND SAFETY OF EXISTING US 23 BUSINESS AND IMPROVE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR CURRENT AND DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC. Description of project (including specific limits) and major elements of work: WIDEN US 23 BUSINESS TO AN UNDIVIDED, FIVE- LANE CURB AND GUTTER SECTION FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO US 19-23-74. Type of environmental document to be prepared: EA AND FONSI Environmental study schedule: EA SEP 93 FONSI JAN 95 Will there be special funding participation by municipality, developers, or other? Yes No _X If yes, by whom and amount: ($) , or M How and when will this be paid? OF wATF9 ' o? PG - o ? Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary VI-El II a Department of Environment and Natural Resources D Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Water Quality MAY 1 8 Q. / p W I WATER QUALITY SECTION 14e l /v)6 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE J September 6, 2001 L `, Haywood County DWQ Project No. 010409 US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy.) from Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 F.A. Project STP-23B(1), State Project 8.1942901 TIP Project No. R-2210A APPROVAL of §401 Water Quality Certification with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Gilmore: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to permanently impact 1,466.16 linear feet of jurisdictional streams resulting in a total of 0.26 acres of surface water impacts to Raccoon Creek and its unnamed tributary *in order to construct the widening of US 23B (Old Asheville Highway) from the Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) in Haywood County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated 9 March 2001 (received 20 March 2001) and additional information provided on 30 August 2001. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 3289 corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Number 14. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non- Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying §404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if stream impacts exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. . 1. In-stream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot trout buffer zone are prohibited from January 1 through April 15 at culvert construction sites 2, 3, and 4 on Raccoon Creek to protect the egg and fry stages of trout from off-site sedimentation during construction. All stream relocation and restoration work shall be performed outside the moratorium period as well. 2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B .0024) must be implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands/ downstream aquatic resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within IS days of grou listiu1bin&ka;tivities to provide long term erosion control. If work is to be perfbrmed during winter months, erosion control matting shall be used around all stream crossings a?d adjacent to streams. 3. All in-stream work shall be Oerformed during low flow conditions. 4. New stream channels shall be'-constructed in the dry and stabilized prior to turning water into them. 5. Storm water shall be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water sheet flow. 6. No live concrete shall come into contact with surface waters until it has hardened. 7. All mechanized equipment used near or in surface waters shall be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of waters from fuel lubricants, hydraulic fuels, or other toxic materials. 8. The presence of mechanical equipment in stream channels shall be minimized. 9. All culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel shall not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert extensions. Culverts shall be installed one foot below the stream to allow for movement of fish and other aquatic life. 10. Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rather, native vegetation consisting of Orchard grass, switchgrass, and Ladino clover in the riparian areas is to be planted. Plantings by live staking shall include: willow, red-osier dogwood, silky dogwood, buttonbush, hazel alder, and rough-leaved dogwood as specified in NCDOT's final design plans. If necessary, rip-rap must be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark, and vegetation must be used for stabilization above high water. 11. Rock silt screens at culvert outlets shall be removed at project completion. 12. Any impacts to waters or wetlands associated with waste or borrow pits from this project may require additional mitigation and will be the responsibility of NCDOT. 13. The 1,466.16 linear feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for at a ratio of 1:1.3 by providing 1,902.40 linear feet of on-site stream relocation/restoration using natural channel design. The stream relocation shall be built and maintained according to the approved plans before any mitigation credit is given. If this Office determines that the stream restoration or associated riparian area has become unstable, the stream shall be repaired or stabilized using only natural channel design techniques if possible. Additionally, the vegetation in the riparian shall be maintained and/or replaced according to the approved plans. Rip-rap and other hard structures may only be used if required by the Division of Land Resources or a Delegated Local Program. Additionally, all repair designs must be submitted to and receive written approval from this Office before the repair work is performed. Because the restored stream is proposed as compensatory mitigation for stream impacts, the restored portion and associated riparian area shall be preserved in perpetuity through a preservation easement or some other legally binding -- mechanism or agreement. The above easement or other legally binding mechanism or agreement must be in place before any mitigation credit shall be given. Additionally, the stream physical and biological monitoring plan shall be followed and reports shall be submitted to this Office after the first year and every other year afterwards for a total of five (5) years. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0500, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h). Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-9646 or Mr. Michael R. Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.251.6208 x256. Attachment Pc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office NCDWQ Asheville Regional Office Central Files File Copy y J. Thorpe, P Director State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources FILE COPY Asheville Regional Office Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary K T S NCDENR' err . tevens Director Division of Water Quality NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRCE3 WATER QUALITY SECTION June 8, 2001. Ms. Alice Gordon N.C. Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Subject: Review of U.S. 23B Project TIP No. R-2210 A DWQ Project 01-0409 Haywood County Dear Ms. Gordon: I have reviewed the application for 401 Water Quality Certification for the project and am requesting the following additional information: 1. Site #1-Stream relocation of unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. Additional stream design data is needed before the review can be completed. There was no reference data provided and the proposed relocation design data is not adequate. A reference reach stream should be located and the proposed stream relocation designed in accordance with the data obtained from that stream reach. 2. Sites #3 and #5-Stream Relocation of Raccoon Creek. It is my understanding that the design of this stream segment was based on data from the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute using the Piedmont regional curve. Since data is also available for the mountains it is recommended that the Mountain regional curve be used for design on Raccoon Creek. This project is being placed on hold until we have received, reviewed and approved these design features. 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone 828/251-6208 FAX 828/251-6452 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10W post-consumer paper Ms. Alice Gordon June 8, 2001 Page Two Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have questions, please call me at 828-251-6208. Sincerely, ;W,? '4 ?. Michael R. Parker Environmental Chemist xc: Randy Henegar, DOT Hydraulics Unit Mark Davis, DOT 14th Division R. G. Watson, P.E. Division Engineer Steve Lund, COE Owen Anderson, WRC Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ Keith Haynes 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone 828/251-6208 FAX 828/251-6452 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper OF W ATFR Michael F. Easley ?O? pG Governor vj William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary y Department of Environment and Natural Resources p C Kerr T. Stevens Division of Water Quality May 15, 2001 Haywood County DWQ Project No. 01-0409 William D. Gilmore Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC, 27699-1548 Re: Haywood County, US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801; T.I.P. No. R-2210A Dear Mr. Gilmore: On March 20, 2001, the NC Division of Water Quality received your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the referenced project. This application has been forwarded to Mr. Mike Parker of the DWQ Asheville Regional Office. Mr. Parker has determined that additional maps and site plans will be required in order to complete his field review of the project. Mr. Parker has been in contact with Ms. Alice Gordon of your staff, and we understand that these supplemental drawings are forthcoming. In the meantime, please note that until this information is received, this project will be placed on hold for processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)). I will also request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold. Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact me at (919) 733-1786. Si ?J n Dorney cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Mike Parker, Mooresville DWQ Regional Office File Copy Central Files 010409 North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) I FILE COPY 010409 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY GOVERNOR March 9, 2001 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 143 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 LYNDO TIPPETT SECRETARY MAR 2 0 2001 ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Lund NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sir: Subject: Haywood County, US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits (Marshall St/Woodland Dr) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd), Federal Aid Project STP-23B (1), State Project No. 81942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 A. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen and improve US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive, at the Waynesville City limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road. The project is approximately 2.2 miles in length. The proposed typical section for the segment of us 23B from Marshall Street to Ratcliff Cove Road is a three-lane curb and gutter section, including a center turn lane. A roundabout will be constructed at Ratcliff Cove Road (SR 1818). From Ratcliff Cove Road to Frances Farm Road (SR 1802), a four-lane curb and gutter, median-divided section is proposed. From Francis Farm Road to 360 feet north of East Howell Mill Road (SR 1196), a five-lane curb and gutter section (including a center turn lane) is proposed. From 360 feet north of East Howell Mill Road to 115 feet south of Industrial Park Drive (SR 1267), a four lane curb and gutter, median-divided facility is proposed, including a median break approximately 380 meters (125 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road. From 115 feet south of Industrial Park Drive to 1312 feet north of Industrial Park Drive, a five-lane curb and gutter section with a center turn lane is proposed. At this point the existing 4-lane undivided facility will be resurfaced to the northern project terminus. The project will not impact any Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in the list of study rivers (Public Law 90-542, as amended). There are no jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the project. This project is in Hydrological Unit 06010106. Summary of Impacts: There are no wetland impacts. There will be a total of 1,466.16 feet of jurisdictional streams affected. This will result in a total of 0.26 acres of surface water impacts at four sites as depicted on Sheet 24 of 24. Site I will impact an unnamed tributary of Raccoon Creek. All of the other sites will impact Raccoon Creek (DWQ Index No. 5-16-14). Summary of Mitigation: We will provide 1,902.40 linear feet of onsite stream relocation/restoration using natural channel design at a ratio of 1:1.3. MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27899-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC rn? rn a ? NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS An Environmental Assessment (EA) was submitted by the NCDOT in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The EA was approved on July 28, 1997. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was approved on July 29, 1999. The EA explains the purpose and need for the project; provides a description of the alternatives considered; and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects. After the EA was approved it was circulated to federal state and local agencies. Copies of the EA and FONSI have been provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request. R-2210A is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111 (f) which lists the FHWA characteristics of independent utility of a project: (1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope; (2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation improvements are made in the area; (3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements. RESOURCE STATUS Wetland delineations: Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area, however four jurisdictional surface water sites were observed. (1) Site 1 is a small, unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The stream is located approximately 610 in (2000 ft) north of where US 23 Business crosses over Raccoon Creek. It is 2.5 feet wide and 1.0 inches in depth and has a substrate composed of sand and silt. Water flow is characteristically low with no aquatic vegetation. (2) Sites 2. 3 and 4 are all located on Raccoon Creek (DWQ Index 5-16-14). At US 23 Business the creek is 15 feet wide with an average depth of 1.0 feet. The substrate is composed of boulder, rubble, gravel and sand. Water clarity is excellent and no submerged aquatic vegetation was observed. At Site 3 a stream survey was conducted on December 11, 2000 by the WRC and NCDOT to determine the species composition along Raccoon Creek and to determine the potential for stream mitigation. Site 3 is located approximately 2,400 linear feet upstream of the confluence of Raccoon Creek and Richland Creek adjacent to US 23B, behind Haywood Christian Ministries. The site sampling began behind the Haywood Christian Ministries and proceeded upstream approximately 100 meters to the existing RCBC under US23B. This section of the stream is entrenched and has fair/good habitat consisting of boulders, rubble, gravel, and sand with a good pool to riffle ratio. Riparian vegetation consists of hardwoods with fairly stable streambanks. The water temperature was 6.5 degrees C (43.7 degrees F). The species captured were rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), brown trout (Salmo trutta), blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus), longnose dace (R. cataractae), northern hogsucker (Hypentelium nigricans), and others. Immediately downstream of Site 3 the creek was channelized, lacked any riparian woody vegetation, and was mowed to the waters edge for a distance of approximately 600 feet. We identified this site as an excellent candidate to qualify as on-site stream restoration. The construction of the highway project will not affect this channelized reach. Following inspection of the site during a field review in November 2000, we acquired the site and redesigned this reach of Raccoon Creek using natural channel design procedures (Sheets 10 and 16 to 21 of 24). It is presented in this application as site 5 and is to act as on-site mitigation for project impacts. TABLE 1. IMPACTS ON R-2210A Site Station Structure Stream Impacts (fl) Stream and DWQ Index Number 1 16+71 - 19+34-L- NA 935 UT to Raccoon Creek 2 10+64.1-Y7- RCBC 23 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 3 28+29.4-L- RCBC 436 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 4 11+14.7-Y I I- RCBC 72 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 TOTAL 1466 Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of December 20, 1999, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) lists seven federally protected species for Haywood County (Table 2). Table 2. Federally Protected Species for Haywood County SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Microhexura montiva a Spruce-fir moss spider E Clemm s muhlenber i bog turtle T S/A Alasmidonta raveneliana Appalachian elktoe E* Felis concolor cougar eastern cougar E Glaucom s sabrinus coloratus Carolina northern flying squirrel E Haliaeetus leucoce halus bald eagle T G mnoderma lineare rock gnome lichen E Isotria meloides small whorled o onia T "E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range). "T" denotes Threatened (a species likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. T(S/A) -Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. *Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago. A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for the bog turtle, the bald eagle, the rock gnome lichen, the small whorled pogonia, the eastern cougar, the Appalachian elktoe, the spruce-fir moss spider, and the Carolina northern flying squirrel because there was no suitable habitat present. A letter of concurrence from the Service has been requested and is expected to be issued shortly. CULTURAL RESOURCES Archaeolop, : Archaeological resource survey work was conducted to determine if significant archaeological resources might be disturbed. No sites were assessed as potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. In a letter dated March 14, 1996, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with this recommendation and a copy is located in the EA (page A-10). Historic: The project site was surveyed by an NCDOT architectural historian and one structure, the Miller- Francis House (HW 81) was found to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C. In a letter dated October 31, 1996, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with a "No Adverse Effect" status for the property as long as Alternate 2, as defined on the Concurrence Form, is followed. This recommendation and a copy is located in the EA (pages A-7 and A-8). MITIGATION OPTIONS The Corps of Engineers had adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the Waters of the United States. Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) and Department of Transportation Order 5660.1 A (Preservation of the Nations Wetlands), emphasize protection of the functions and values provided by wetlands. AVOIDANCE: No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters. MINIMIZATION: Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts. Minimization techniques were implemented as follows: 1. Slopes: Fill slopes adjacent to jurisdictional surface waters are at a 2:1 ratio. 2. Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters will be enforced. 3. Clearing: Clearing Method II will be used. 4. Culverts: Culverts at site 2 (Station 10+60 to 10+70, Sheets, 7 and 8 of 24), Site 3 (Station 28+29, Sheets 9 and 17 of 24), and Site 4 (Station 11+14 -Y 11-, Sheets 19 and 20 of 24) were designed using low flow channel design. The December 11, 2000 stream survey of Raccoon Creek at about Station 29+50 by the WRC and NCDOT resulted in the capture of rainbow trout and brown trout. As a result of this survey the design of the culverts on the entire project was revised. The revised design will to ensure that a low flow system that would enhance trout habitat is established. COMPENSATION: As previously mentioned, we have acquired a stream mitigation site located adjacent to the highway project. The site is labeled Site 5 and is located immediately downstream of Site 3. At that point, the creek exits the riparian wooded system and becomes a channelized stream with no pool and riffle geometry and lacking riparian woody vegetation. It is mowed to the water's edge for a distance of approximately 600 feet. The construction of the highway project will not affect this channelized reach. Following the site visit in November 2000 by NCDOT biologists, the NCDOT acquired the site and redesigned this stretch of creek using natural channel design procedures. It is presented in this application as site 5 (Sheets 10 and 16 to 21 of 24) and is to act as partial on-site mitigation for project impacts. The design of stream mitigation sites generally requires that a 50-foot buffer on both sides of the creek be established where topographically possible. We were not able to provide this amount of buffer on all sections of the stream relocation (Sites I and 5). The impacts from the project are 1,466 linear feet. We are providing 1,902 feet of mitigation at sites 1 and 5. This is 436 feet more mitigation than would normally be needed at a ratio of 1:1. We are offering this additional 436 feet of mitigation at Site 5 as compensation for the reduced buffer. In addition, on Site 5 we will provide woody vegetation between the top of bank and the western edge of the PDE as depicted on Sheet 10 of 24. Thus, we will provide 1,902 linear feet of onsite stream mitigation using natural channel design at a ratio of 1:1.3. This mitigation consists of 1105 linear feet of stream relocation at sites 1 and 3; and 797 linear feet of stream restoration at site 5. The design of these stream segments is depicted on Sheets 4 to 6 of 24 and Sheets 9 to 15 of 24. The design incorporates low flow culvert design with baffles as depicted on the attached drawings. REGULATORY APPROVALS This project will take place in a mountain trout county. Thus we anticipate that comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers. Application is hereby made fora Department of the Army Nationwide 14 Permit as required for the above- described activities. We are also hereby requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we have enclosed a check for $475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application. We are providing seven copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review. If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon at (919) 733- 7844 extension 288. Sincerely, /`William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager '/ Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch cc: w/attachment Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS, Asheville Mr. Owen Anderson, WRC, Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E. Program Development Branch Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics Unit Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design Unit Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit Mr. R. G. Watson, P.E., Division 14 Engineer DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID: NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT If) 14 PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE: 1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS 2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION 3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT. 1. OWNERS NAME: N.C. Dept. of Transportation; Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch 2. MAILING ADDRESS: 1548 Mail Service Center CITY: Raleigh STATE SUBDIVISION NAME: NC ZIP CODE: 27699-1548 PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): 3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): (WORK): 919-733-3141 4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager 5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): COUNTY: Haywood NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Waynesville 1 SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits (Marshall St/Woodland Dr) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd), 6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: RIVER BASIN: French Broad Raccoon Creek 7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, EXPLAIN: Trout found in stream during sampling in December 2000 /b. 15 THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[x] 7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION? 8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION): 8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: 9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 0 2 10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY: FILLING: EXCAVATION: FLOODING: OTHER: DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0 10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION): SEE PERMIT DRAWINGS AND COVER LETTER LENGTH BEFORE: 1,466 FT AFTER: 1,902 FT WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): various FT WIDTH AFTER: various FT AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: various FT AFTER: various FT (2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: x PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: x CHANNEL EXCAVATION: x CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: OTHER: Stream Mitigation site. 11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? na WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? 12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY): See Cover Letter 13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Public Transportation 3 14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS): NA 17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND? YES [x] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18) a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT? YES [x] NO [] b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE? YES [x] NO [ ] IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE (919) 733-6369. 4 18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS: a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT. b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY PROJECT. C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED. e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE. NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO: 1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, 2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND 3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE DATE (AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.)) 5 VICINITY 14AP SITE J? LaM to 1 M" N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1912901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WA`1"NESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 1 OF Z-- 02-,r,/ Dal Bt Yew PAS 01 it FI• !.. LEGEND -WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER (POND) ® DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND ®DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND • • DENOTES MECHANIZED • CLEARING ?- FLOW DIRECTION TOP OF BANK WE - EDGE OF WATER ?- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL --?-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY - - NG - - NATURAL GROUND - - 1L - - PROPERTY LINE -TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - _0 - WATER SURFACE XXXXX LIVE STAKES BOULDER 5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED BOX CULVERT PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT (DASHED LINES DENOTE EXISTNG STRUCTURES) C. SINGLE TREE WOODS LINE ¦ DRAINAGE INLET ROOTWAD VORTEX ROCK WEIR 000p0 FLIP RAP RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR BASIN VANE N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION HAYWOOD COUNTY nn ?.TFr`T 8.10P2901 (R-2210A) SHEET 2 OF 22 10-15-99 SATE SAP EAGLENEST MTN. l DelKyood 19 _t 276 ej;?, v, I i 23 WAYNESVILLE 74 276 SIT ' 'usk BEGIN 1un?al PROJECT ^ ( scTE v BUS H=ekwood 23 R3 ' SITE 2 SITE I END Ws PROJECT 'r 23 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAA'WOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FRONI WAYiN ESVILLE CIT i' LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 3 OF- ?:-z 10-15-99 11 o 61 g I D ? aoa ° I .?I F-I ,f © p o I II / III I I II I ?J 1 I1 I I I ? I I ?I a II o ?I 0 0 ?l Y z o ° L ? F I o a ' a x zZ ) : x U o W U c F o o ?; ? a ?' L I r: z o a ? ? d o I o ?- o O p.. M `n F ? F U c, O L A ? 0 ? U R. t3 W z m ? o U I ? N I ? I4 I - ?g I 87. I I I I I I I ?e I n 1 \ \ g° I \ \ 1 ? \ I - I I I I I e l Z S m a! N z J ..1 c? z GI O a U L1 N O E U1 N ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE 0 STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 22HA (0.08 MI2) CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 2% BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 2 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.12 M BANKFUL X (A bk f) -SECTION ARE 0.24 M2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO f /d bkf) 12 Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.2 M WIDTH Flood-Prone Area f e 3.2 M ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 1.6 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 8 MM SINUOSITY (K) 1.1 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH 30 M AVG. AMPLITUDE 8 M AVG. RADIUS 19 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 0.23 CMS 02 1.0 CMS 050 2.0 CMS VELOCITY: ,, P,MuFill Vz i 0.94 m/s x.50 V50 1.77 M/S CLASSIFICATION B5 EXISTING STREAM IS AN EXCAVATED DITCH AND WAS NOT USED AS A REFERENCE O REFERENCED "APPLIED RIVER MORPHOLOGY" BY DAVE ROSGF. N STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE I N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS H.A.YWODD COUNTY PROJECT: ?.? ?; Y9U1 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 6 OF :?Z 10/15,999 7 ? ff ? N Z O H W $ LL) V) 0 Q V a a r s• e e W A a a?b 3 z O f= VW w7 0 J ` V a r 3 J s 3 g 7. O y? a S < OJ M pp r ! U wu- f- p ° g y z ? p a c °.d O ? O y> F th ° a < I a ; z J _ CL 0 0 O 4 O 0 I ,- I 0 m RACCOON CREEK / - f-• 10+40 Z 7 O N m IF I I z p ,f a M ko J ?CQ z o o ?? I O a V) N 0 06 I O V C4 w O I a' r"j ti cn z 1 J W U Q a W 1 / I / o I c CO ? 4.1 m / Q? 3 w s ? z X I I o O I' I = I II ? I ? I ° ow CI co rl--Ol r7--l CY) J J W J z o N Q CO 3 U J U Z v Li Z Z Q F- 2 N U ? N U X Z J W 0 W N O CL Nr? O I ? \ CL \ / I J O Q7 , /?G \ Q O / ?C ?0 W J I LL / L.L- O / a / Y O Q J W O C) F-- Z Z p W - I z W J<< ?O ~ 2 WJJ Z ?U N QtY O O ?Q Q J W WJLL > Z g W -J >X'S =) <o OXO UW xa-/ z n00 J aln0 WWQ _j Z cr a LULL. ?-- OW.Jtr I-aL,-<->WO OMOZ3:ZMLL- Z » K rl--O? coloo z 0 H d F 0 a z d F w O F-F Is, W D U z PT?PT? cyo P=l F z 0 0 U D 8 3 d x d x x w O z O O d 0 c? e? c? 0 c ev e c E-F U f:V ti O a U F-' w7 O x O O L-n MATCH LINE SHe 10 a 0 0?? n / 16 ,...009 0 _4 00 Pik k _ I I I I W° z ?u wv.4 N _k Of" Z, C3 o ct . / . i ;' I ( I l w o?-Fp>F w ? X Lis• e I 'S u3 I Q 1 1 w ; 0 LLJ _ r \ r I rU ?W Y \ ?- v D. LINER I& ANNA ST@W?RT k ? BS7 rC - ---- JOSE N D. LINER - - EXISING Riw U; p (? W L.j I •, I 71 z \\ ( II: i°s? Ow (L 0 La C3 J ? y -I " W L l 1 II / c$" / -+ ,` Jas ?\ ? '? _? I I - I v E\\\\ I I c? I / a: ck *kk ?• W?. / m.? 1X/ ? Cn -i N O d N w O OH w w „Nr I I Wb ? U b ?- ? mr / ? ? Z a Q A14 8- x ,? - ? ® ? . CL a F ? a \ O ? n "i m'^ I VJ ? CA m r a ® F"I a ? ? p \ I x ? i ? d ?wU acv Q v' J F 0 Oad? ?p x ? I 4 ? \ I III Q?e a W ; Iri?.7? v I d J ? I.X Q I I Q LL. I I \ =a ? ? I i ? ? W \ I w N, w \ `? x a I I I j I I I ?- I -? \ \ w \ p , I I \ I x I I I W W \\ Ln ' 1 O> W tno 01 ,w „°y ,W N 1 I x k°= 1 , 11 z w ;a / I I 1 , F 1 iQ 0. "s 1 x I I o 1 I? ?,a ' I I I 1 ? U .6 ,F„ ? / 1 Z 1.6 x I I A h -?-.•__ 111 I x I I I i ? ?,I? w I I n I ? z ( to zo w ?a a x ? I `ale Iri ? 00 '?' - ? I ? x ? I ? N 1 -T 4Y Y I \ ' I? I I r N, \ t K a ( ar >Lj /0 a ZO I _ \ \ w 1 1 I N V, oo° w m x I o "I I I 1 3 .? W N ? N 1 I P t? - M1j I E wl I II J d a U w \ ZObx -I 1 ZO I j =j W I EE N \ i 4 II S Y' I l ? I- I W , x I I I I ?? ? ? ,I I I I I l l I I, I III I I? ,/ - O 0 MATCH LINE S H . 09 4 DETAIL ROOT VV AD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 20- 30' A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. ?-UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL \A??,FL0 \30" FOOTER LOG FOOTER LOG (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT WAD LOGS (0.46m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS - PLAN VIEW NOT To SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES l rSEE PLANTING PLAN FOR 1 / STABILIZATION MEASURES BANKFULL ELEVATION ( VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. ROOT WADS - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SITE III AND V N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY ! PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) i LAS 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 11 OF 22 02-12-01 ROOT FA-N- ' ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. jR NCHOR ROCKS TO REST N TO P OF ROOT WAD. :L: _0OT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT x U O a W J Q U N O F- O 2 W a eL V N W ? 3 x J a ? J I u a l ~ m a ?O a 1 U ' z o I Q ? N Z ? p .-? cn H °m c, Cl a F. O O y C, cf) O ao O Gl O o F? H C a U) d ti v a ? Y U 0 W 0 ``' I ` CD w Z y O U w 0 J W 3 C? 2 = O ? J U co z O W J 2 Z Q - WQE > J I ~ C=7LIl ZZ Q I W I m Y U ? p O J J ? W O F- Q x O m V1=X V) O L/) Cr crOa ..oWa W JZUI 1-Do- 00F-x ZCO VIC Q W V Z V) b a Wm J ? J m m -' x W A O 4i T m I CC) O \ V W o bs? 0 ?!: m Q J Q- 0 0 o' Og D ? 8 0 ? c 0 i C n Q 8 70 c Q Y ULM 0+- 3 L 0 x C E L < 0 D >, u'o X0 +- > 0 L 2 (V0 + L -' -"'f C a) UD 4- C 7OQ +_O } U Ln L1cC T ?L ? L N U C 0 Un V L 0pE co0 Y) E x +-'6 O Y n U W O L L L O Q p O c Q) Un +- n '0 0 0 Q ) C 2'E ao0 c . O{- z3 o L:l O L F- a •- O L a ell z O 0 3 V) > 0 l? I o ??= j ? g 0 a 2 Q O W y` z F Z O w J a z d E F rx. E-4 O v x ? w O O o z 0 U a p O cG v c ' !? oG v ti ? w z ca c C/) O w a w z ? " In p F l FI z cn W o ? p(7<Q ° of m gw Qml o o cu n.? . h b U,N? v IQ?? p b I ° Q EI : Ea E oao 08 o 0 C) 'Q. ° ° a x U O cC ?i OI u _x i ti r p ic z O .1u Q U W W lY !n r N Y W O O x N If?'1 7 rZ N -NY U O N z Z Q W IL W V1 ; W r W ?m U CL Q = U !Y vri Q W W > J r Q Q O W u z J N O r O Z *0 ?y y I N I K 1 y? J I (.J 4 a 7 , `\ f- N J ? J LL ? \ Q 4 m I \o Z D? ° 1 1 U LJ 1 ¢ O o $ Oo z \ w b b C? i r y N_ YV Wm pJ O ? a m.. i b' H Q a z 0 o 0 z O -04 C., z 5 a 0 a c F- O U > E-+ z a Y U O !Y LY W r O ?O j rW Il p ? m 1 ? Q 7 1? L i r O to _ I- U T? U') 3 O U- 0 Z I Or J 0 co Z oL p J Z a ? W(r E a ? J 1 Q L Z Z -i a i w i m Y U >- pO ? J? W = r Ora =o? Nx x to Q V) o a w „p W Q wJ Z r00 N OO r x z m (n Q W V / z a O O F. cr a ? z C C7 zxo `4 d U o 04 R. O o z CO Y a H U?-4 W LLJ zo A O C W o' V a x a ?. ? Q V 0-1 r ,e ??9 j.ux'W 3 a g Q A? rot ? Q E a? a _ >1 cn HJ QJ 2 Q Nel Oyu W NrJ 1l L, r w ? ((.y?..l WNZ L1 N= v_ aJ U a oo Q Y <J° LL a (D a jZ r (L W N E,. cog. E E Q O O Q W wWJ I ,? c0 ??'m u v n ° J Q dz -g5 g o ?3 v ~O LL I L N V) ?3 v z I v Z I w J C) °w Q W ? 0 Z N Lo L U Z O i z QN _ C 3? V W YYl , W WNW U w N $ w o°aa >- E e N o Z3t F- 0 'r tai 9 - - °; Q 4 O W_ a o> a- °' r a ~ a? O W / co z 4 3 Nw w b C?1 U t? x ?a _ J Q z o Q -D ? W (n Z CD E :3: -?WN L_ C ? O D CO W ? . ? <rU p ZW + - z ? - z ?O? m U 61 LL. Z c I III J <I ? m U Jv7-? d6 J U m o Q U? 1U - Z = ~ O o E Q?? ~ m 3 Ln 4- C) O W W > ° d W a- LLI Z co 1 Q CO (n , O ¢J CL W . J CL Cn :D W o E Pte Q l ZZ _ JCD 0 r r W n ?Q CO ::D? LL Q Z <j: Q J Z D O ? cc ?W~ CL <I m + p 0 QmQO z ZLL2: 0? N m O m ap of ?D m v O c ? r r r- ti ` ?" •• F 0 4 `n O Q F c O J uj O a x ? c z x , z a F 0 A 0 J G ao O CJ ? ?„ z O ?- U ev O rn z A ?. i A a ? z w 1 ri) r 1 J p co 1 I J V, J w I Z. Z 1 r ? LL 2 U J w W Q 1 ` O J p w Z Q u tY \ \ O CL \ \J w a_ z F- a w D a O Ln o -- '- ? b 0 w x N w N O ? J C F- co w (-.7 Z Y Z w C) / / co L wZz Ohm a 1 U ..? J a ?O F- Z 2 wJJ -LLI ? U U NJa ? a? Cn F- o?° wF-a z z Q U wJLL > pw J: _ E•- Zap O -O UW O C:a ?aJ LL?z am T J OV WWQ F- O E ? F- N F-aLi-<O>WO OmOZ3,zmu Z + + l I O O N O (7) co 00 ?D co v 00 L E? n ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 23.2 KM2 23.2 KM2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 8.8 M 6 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.41 M 0.46 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf) 3.65 M 2 .7 M 2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) 21.48 .04 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FLOOD PRONE AREA (Wfpa) 18.9 M 14 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.1 2.1 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 M SINUOSITY (K) 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 4.7 CMS 4.7 CMS 02 1?.4 rM5 18.4 CMS 050 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 1.28 M/S 1.1 M/S V2 2.0 M/S 1.8 M/ V50 2.4 M/S 2.5 M/S CLASSIFICATION 84C 64C * EXISTING STREAM IS REFERENCE STREAM STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE III AND V f N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS I HAYWOOD COUNTY ' ' i PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM I WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS i TO SR 1801 SHEET 18 OF 22 02-12-01 - - - --------- - I,- W o WzZ Ohm a< ~ ?- O Z = L,j U J J N J Q a0 ? a? OI- o ri- < p J LL- L.LJ L J > Z ?W 1:2 O OH O NC U W ?Z O W J ? o In o W W Q 1- -:i:: Q cn O Z 0 :?E W? HpWJIr F- <LL- < > WO OmOZ?Zm Z ? ? 0 M w 00 L-Li Q ?I Q D Q 0 Cr Q' LLJ 0 Q0 Q0 rli X @J Ln O N M 0 I 00 LO 6-) co co N r-- f-- d- cv 00 00 z F I ^, o N r F O W 1 C ?°. z F c z U 00 LT- U? O W 1 O c, o 0 w p j U p m > Z w A y , E-? I L.Li m z x I I = I a W Z Z a u I o I J -? p W In O I Z LL- Z J a CO ? O n b LLJ -' I LL I CC) I I z ? I cn `-' 1 CD I o ~ w .? U .?.7 I W O -? u cn I ® U I 0 z 0 ? o W N O O ? N 00 co PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS 1560 Asheville Rd. Haywood Elec. Corp. Waf nesville, ?I.C. 2878c (? 300 N(D-th He Nood 1 Haywood Services Corp., Inc. N a y n e V l II ° (1. L. C 1449 Asheville Rd. James and Nancy Francis Waynesville, 28780 2228 Asheville Rd. Joe H Elise D Palmer Waynesville, N.C. 2878;S _ 2238 Asheville Rd. Haywood Co. Consolidated School System Waynesville, N, C. 2 8 7 8 (rD 2568 Ashe'?Ille Rd. Plemmons Plumbing and Heating Waynesville, N. C. 2878,S l Welch Farm Rd. William and Alice Gregory Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2489 Asheville Rd. Haywood Christian Ministry, Inc. Wa\/nesville, N.C. 28786 541 Peace M o u n cin Pd. David C. and Lynda B. Blevins WC\/ esV I le, N.C. 28 vl?i Street The Champion Paper and Fiber Co. C n -D n, N. C. 2 a 7! 6 HAW00b ADVAAICME)IT oµ,JDkrIOA/ 144 inlDusTRi^.? PAP-k 'R. WAYn1ESVILLE WDrIs1:8_IAL PARk WC. U1AYA/e6VILl£) Al.C, Ze78(o 0 0 7 G .j c O 1 W O Q 0 Q N a? o N _ } O Z = O O O CL o v Wp g n CL LL Z = O N N w 2 Cf) rn LO co =1.c p 0 0 0 O S Z O C C O U) •°- g IL = CL z ' LO 0 U ) CO 0 LL N L LL fC Z ° N V t7 t7 67 n f7 I N C U w E N ° ° •- N L U ? c c 8' v 'y „C• a E N 1` M N N uU E U o = ? a o.tniR ? o 0 0 0 W O LL C p L O 0 0 0 ? _a O pp pp ... 1 L Q 1 Q5 ? ° C '` l0 Q Q Q Q Q U G Q a x w c ? C C L y O ` i o c o y d 3 z m N M !n ? N ri c? ri a N N N a' H C O J ? } ? } 0 J O CC r0 O (n ? at O? N + ? ? + LL n } + 0 co N + N fh J ? 6 '- N th Q ?(I F- W H :• VICINITY MAP FILE COPY SITE to 7 '114 It eac Fr?ru-t-l?._n?e ?r0 I East Fp =1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 108.17-01 SHEET 1 OF_j 0Z-16-,01 LEGEND --WL6 WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE U EL WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT Em WETLAND DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE ® SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER (POND) SINGLE TREE ® DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND r!?L_r^z'tr! WOODS LINE DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND ¦ DRAINAGE INLET • DENOTES MECHANIZED • • •• • • • CLEARING ROOTWAD ?- FLOW DIRECTION TB TOP OF BANK 00000 VORTEX ROCK WEIR - WE - EDGE OF WATER ? IMIT OF CUT RIP RAP - - - PROP. L - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL RIP RAP ENERGY --?- RIGHT OF WAY PROP DISSIPATOR BASIN. . - - NG- - NATURAL GROUND - - P-?- - PROPERTY LINE VANE -TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- • ENDANGERED E I BOUNDARY LANT P - - v - - - WATER SURFACE XXXXX LIVE STAKES O BOULDER CORE FIBER ROLLS 5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) SITE MAP EAGLENEST MTN. t 1 l .1 - *- ?j L - t 2 23 WAYNESVILLE ' BEGI S? • PROJE SITE 2,7 SITE I r PROJECT 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT- 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FRONT WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 3 OF-7- 10-15-99 UKY*od I1 23 m? 3 I' Ip ? I? a xl I I I ? I III II 1 x 41 6 I R?aaa a-? oI 0 "oil -] II II .m ®? b II a,.,l ? "?_ a II o ?I I ? Q Eli IaI BQx IM a If 'Ia o I ( I _I? otw a ??I? ? ? y I ? ? II a a I ®?,$ II 313 sus a I e lit ?-1- o ?p ? I O x ' b MON ® p oil 4 II ' cowwa I ° .. o m M O _?- ` =- a I z o v? . c xz?o ' z xo? U Uo oCV a h 4 0y1 o U o o ?r C r 5 t A A a ? ? a 3 z ?I pl w I ? ? cn Ig I? t t ?? Ln N O LQ I N •I tt ? A ff ? 3 e e S, N O _ In 0 F U ? e. F- 7 Ny? r ; F. i e1 q ?g F .w m a b?'Y 6 d z O F- UI W N 0 J " 0,. H J J 7 'O? 9 z o ffi? ? F c > w o C ? oo ? U ~ Wu$ ? c a $ ? z? ?.a b. 0 o z O o a > ? c ?z w U A 0. ? m z ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE O STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME WOLF CREEK RACCOON CREEK TRIB, DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 67ha. (0.26mi?) 22HA (0.08 MIZ) CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 2.5 % 2.3Z BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 1.6 m 1.5 m MEAN DEPTH (d bkf) 0.03 m 0.2 m BANKFUL X (A hkr) -SECTION ARE 0.48 m2 0.27 m2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO 5.3 7.5 Maximum DEPTH (d,bkf) 0.34 m 0.3 m WIDTH Flood-Prone Area f , 3.2 m 2.1 m ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 2.0 1.4 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 150 mm 8 mm SINUOSITY (K) 1.1 1.1 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH 22 m 30 m AVG. AMPLITUDE 4.5 m 8 m AVG. RADIUS 2.0 m 12 m DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 0.52 cros 0.32 cros 02 1.1 cros 0.9 cros 010 2.0 cros 1.7 cros VELOCITY: V. BANKFULL 1.3 m/s 1.3 m/s V2 1.6 m/s 1.5 m/s VIO 1.9 m/s 1.77 m/s CLASSIFICATION B4 B5 EXISTING STREAM IS AN EXCAVATED DITCH AND WAS NOT USED AS A REFERENCE O REFERENCE LOCATED BETWEEN STECOAH AND ALMOND IN SWAIN CO. ADJACENT TO N.C. 28 STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE I J r S r aD I .a RACCOON CREEK s ' m i J d 10+40 a r N 0 N ?l / J / 0.. 0 LL- ? X-- k , h a ? J O X O I N I FI ;I ui 0 !?I o0 ?:: V) -J, >- Z CL Q O r U 11+00 W ow r u u z ti) a F B U 7H A A W U w J Q 3 N N N Q !Y C7 a) v cr) N a) 0 03 co z ? O 0 R z V -00 ? x Q, ?U z p F 0 0 ° 4 a ? w 0 z d0 ?>H A x a ? A CL J v ? J z o z V) Z Q m ?j W v LL Z Z I` N CD F- V) a U x Z J. W r) W 0 O Nrl 0- 0 r?l k?l ? ? I /? ? W Q ,, G I a J ? I I D LL. Q ) J O a I Z I o ? I z m w o a ; w I-ZZ o LLJ J Q Q Om / U . ] -- ~ JJ f L.Ljm ?U NQ? ? 0F- Q°o Y z ( - ~ Q 0 J W ,,_ > Z WJ 0 . , °0-? D<0 a z 00f 0 UW Q?QJ iz 0 x LL1 > L 0-co J o( o WWa ~ O C\j ?OZF- WLL- f--OWJ? F--<LL-<>WO OWOZ3ZMLL. Z* O O ?I ?I C\J 00 ol Lcl IINI? H3ld iu' \ NQ I / i. 60 d a\ I d y 4 d5 1 00 \ p \ (o / W z O L? ? i C^ ?TTpp C3 va ? ? h p I i3 a R pA?ZWc?n O O ,?7 009 I I _W_$ 1- A A x a W II JO H L ANNA STEWART / I ? ? ' o. uNEa I I I: \ IIt II I ?? I w J a ?y \ \ V O \ S r ???llV//ttt ? TO ih' _ b „MRiET,yp 13o2eo 5 ,ti AS ?y f z AMMO f, 1 / w I r( ACAS A O aGp \ \ \ 9 ' ' k\k ? 9 H W V O V1 Iri i-1 \\ \ v N x H O Ap q a I c> °° I I a yj?tiv,w Q i A ?xo? © ?,? ? H I 1= z w II I I I II •I• ``I x Ilx ? ` II II I ? I xq I fl i? ,--?\`? ? II II j • ? ? ? I ? ,? x I I '' ? 1 1 I 1 I I ? ?, ?? ? t" I q 11 11 v ? II ? x 1 1 I I I I I ,/ I ,', ? x I ? 111 11 ? > ? ? Q9 x W '- 1 ? ? 1 1 5 I' I 0 W 1 1 W __ II II ? I ? i 7 ? z x W 1 a 11j I ?I JW 4 ?? W I••?• 'IY I I ? / ? 1 .9 1 I I 10 uzo W 7i L II II ' ? ? x ,i zo ? - ? / I I x I I ti Ix to 00 N \ 1 1 H x l 1?1 1 W N A I CO i iI I I zo. x I zo l ;$; 3 ??II I ? \•? I gx I I I ?? ? ? N I I I ?? j ? x I x 0 3NI? HOiVA "DLO ?y FGA , . ROOT F4N- - 0° p° 30 /,3.6 FOOTER LOG FOOTER LOG (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT WAD LOGS (0.46m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS - PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR [SEE MEASURES BANKFULL- ELEVATION ( VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ROOT WADS DETAIL ROOTWAD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 20' 30' A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. I-UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. NCHOR ROCKS TO REST N TOPOF ROOT WAD. 4OOT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SITE III N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET-11-OF Z.4 02-I2-01 x U W J a U V) 0 F- t- O Z I a , I W I I~ = J a ¢ + `1 w °z iQ ° z a I^ 1 z _ ? Dy I 1 - a `j' 1 ~ U j•: cn 1 zo 2 C? n c c ? d H c O J o r?z a w a x ?) v .1 V) o o H 00 rz ?T. p z W ? 44 O O o ? J t: E. O u v) p A x a?? E V t3 L C z Y U O W 1- 0 O IT uj I 1 1 ? a z 'w o U T? W O J LL. x t_- 3 0 Z= O i- J '00 W C, J ZZ a- WQE 7 J 1 ~ C=7lCl ZZ , Q I W - 1 m Y U >- O O J J C? W 2 O ? ? = X V) O In Cry cr 0n W Q W-jZ V) F-DO- OOF-X Z CO V) < W z a wm J a ° m p i D co N O a0 ? E'" ay a x z ? U o ? Q ? G4 q r , p O Q U •Mi w °lm''N Gn > x o o J Q V H 7 aT ? E ® - o Li W !-yW N-= LL =a U y wpog ? F d JJ z LL- 3 ODW Q ?aT a O om; pp55 Z O Q W W b 0 E E O Q U Q Q Ew w? og ??mY o o w -, a (\J v Y W If o Q" N (n Z- I a z I Z \\ NN U W O g = n O U y N J7i 0<0- E o E o Z 3 F--. O " v Y - - q Q p Ow_ n 0: » 0- > d. a u. i ~ O cr i w ao < Z ? w m cn co co co 0 z 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 0 J m / J J N W i Z z o a lL U Z 1 O N 2 Co \ I \ U 0 1 \ \? Z a 1- LLJ o O o p ?x I W C) N:E lq J //I LL o ? / p- co w tL / C7 Z) Li- Y / Z Z a J W L-D C) / m F-Zz O W ?m - , z W Jaa ?o ~ / = WJJ z U N Q? aOO F- F-Q _ j W WJW ] z pW J? 5,?? Sao C)Xo UW Q? Z Q?QJ W a-mJ O WLLJQ F- Jzx=F-? Q viLLO:?Xo? - L ALL F- F-QLLQ->WO o mOZ3?OOIL Z* • (2)1 z ° N? m 1101 ,)1 00 00 ao I- 1` r- ° 1--1 n F N , d o ~ O x a z O a w w v z Ingo d V Z W n S ?a o ? A ° d U a ? ? z F? W U W . a ? d a U z ? O U O W x ? O ? N O O ITEM MT. REGIONAL CURVE REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAM RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 11.9 KM 2 11.9 KM 2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 10.7 M 6.5 M 6.0 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.55 M 0.4 M 0.50 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf 2 5.57 M 2.02 M2 3.0 M 2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) 15.85 12 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FLOOD PRONE AREA (Wfpo) 8.8 M 15.0 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.1 .5 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 MM SINUOSITY (K) 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 6.0 M 2.29 CMS 3.23 CMS 02 17.0 CMS 17.0 CMS 010 29.0 CMS 29.0 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 0.96 M/S 1.1 M/S V2 1.46 M/S 1.51 / VIO 1.62 M/S 1.76 M/S CLASSIFICATION 64C 64C EXISTING STREAM IS REFERENCE STREAM STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE III I N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 REV. 06-18-01 SHEET 15 OF 24 02-27-0I DETAIL ROOTWAD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 26- 36 A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL ?,F L0 \* ROOT _FA-N 30 t7° ..? 30 3.6 FOOTER LOG 'y FOOTER LOG (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT WAD LOGS (0.46m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES rSEE PLANTING PLAN FOR 1 STABILIZATION MEASURES BANKFULL- ELEVATION ( VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ROOT WADS ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. ANCHOR ROCKS TO REST ON TOP OF ROOT WAD. -ROOT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SITE V N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 16 OF Z+ 02-12-01 Y w w U 2 0 O V 6 J Q V a r F- $?S E P 0 ? J Q J S < HU a> orw ?F J w F ui VI a-0. ww C:)c3o 0 4J4 0:)w It S K ?i, 1-9 Y E^ am0 PZ ?m d Y w z _O N 51 E Y V ? a y d E $ E E N ? P H1 ?+? o 0 49 ?? ?v v N Z O ?y V N Q Q U CL Z Q J 0- Z O O w 0 Z w Ow vN tz Q N wlnm F-- O w OQd Z33 Ow O j U- 0 l w Y Z w a? L/) o k a z x ? x z o U a .- 94 F' A O 2 A p K- aC W 0 c?. O .?? W U a LLJ i LLJ LLJ [if L-J? U O z Z Q CL O O U a-- Q O N N LL) Q J U (/) a U w V) O z _ ?- O NO LL CL x U O c4 x 0 0 x om? 0 3Z O QV w an H tnO O = NIM 0 - NY IN UO N a Z Z aW w N 3 W I- LL) ? m (J a Q ~ a N W J F- Q C) LL, U Z J V1 O H F O ? 'y0 y i'N t W i N W J a N Z ,/?' /q J If ? 1 q / U N O`' - - / r? it O ~ ? II s o0 a5 Q? Q N p?J m..I N 2 z s N 2 < O H F o A c z O ? ° ? ° U z m M w d ? o . z A a ? Y V (L' tY W F ° W O LL r W m 00 1 ? 1L z o_ N F- ((U^ 'l V / 3 O J LL 0 Z= or J Z co ow Q J Z Q ? waE >J I Q cD ?I ZZ Q I W I co Y U > -iW cr OI- Q =O =X N ° W°a OWQ wJ Z O° ? X Zm in Q W V / W A !'U !gyp "U • 0 •: ,? . 0 Q .0. 1 0. ol 0'. h? 'o g ? U g O? ? ? a g g 8 3 a 0 0 0 0$8 o h .0 .00 0 0 ?. . 0 0 Q W 1 Q ? O CL. N? C Q T m I co o \ V N 0 _?-.gyp 0 8 V) / g 3 / g C U L M oV L 30 p x a? L C in L 0, o n . 0 0 D 0 T Cr? X L - ° E L +? c ( + L - Y C a) 00 U Cj0Q ? y.3 v? Ln ocU) ? 0 C T ?o 5 O ?Y•? C + - 7U?O WC) .CLa)E a E x + 0 U) U U) 0 L LL a O o c a)U}a o o o ?; o o; CC ao00C ff- z3 UJ L F- Q - Q) O L 0. z O o 3 j / m a? z o a d x E., z 04 O W a z H rZ4 O w v 0.. W o ZO > A U o O ? x a O CPS c+ °?` U ti a F4 W ? U U .5 z , cn O H ? N G4 O x W V/ g C) A oU-O- E o O Q CIA ? N t 0 O I o g ?W '•?' o J LLJ c o o ° e I` C Q ? C; F ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAM RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 23.2 KM 2 23.2 KM 2 23.2 KM2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 6.4 M 6.5 M 5.84 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.46 M 0.41 M 0.46 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf) 2 .23 M 2 2.02 M 2 2.2 M WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) 11.3 15.85 12.1 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.6 M 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FL600 PRONE AREA (Wfpa) 8.0 M 13.5 4 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 1.2 2.1 2.1 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 MM 32 MM SINUOSITY (K) CHANNELIZED DITCH 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 1.98 CMS 1.92 CMS 1.85 CMS 02 18.4 CMS 18.4 CMS 18.4 CMS 050 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 0.9 M/S 0.9 M/S 0.91 M/S V2 2.0 M/S 2.0 M/S 1.45 / V50 2.6 M/S 2.4 M/S 2.5 m/s CLASSIFICATION G4 134C 64C REFERENCE STREAM IS IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF MITIGATION SITE AND DOWNSTREAM OF RCBC N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SIT]" V HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 20 OF 24 02-27-01 z o F , a E?--0 A v'T O 4. F E• F 0 ?, W M O a? o ?z ?, . A u a 3 w / / f I iof 4O I COMO m m Hied ?? I I ?y s V c O I - I y I I I I I I I it M II II 1 I I ti F? _ m T I, _ i I L2-%L o I ? ° 0 v ? u a a Q U cn E O N O E O o l (00 V , w 0 O Q D Q O C) LLJ O C- J w ? O ?-zz ?Qa c; w 0 z w U l/ Q a o ?0h- o 1-Q O J Ld _j Owl w Z J:2 >=? O 0 za0 U w ?QJ CC) ? 11?z 2 - J O V) w LLJ Q F- JZ==F- ? Q , O:2 cnLL -Or wLi F- OwJ0? I-<LLQ ->w0 0co0z?ZMLL- Z e + 00 X (P1 0 O N r4 QM(\,j Co -v z Lli I c r) I W I z z I = a I a U I o 0 I w J (n I -1 O ZD 0- 0 Y ? Q Z 0- w ? J CO ? J J I N j ? ' O 1 w I ? O I J I z co Oo 00 r-- I 10-1 CO 1-0 J w z Z Q 2 U U Z F- L/) X w 00 rl- z p Cl) ° N it 1-1 O z F p -4 " O ..a w ir CY E" O a ?., O Z > A $ x ? -? E? y M W J N H A p" ? z P? W J U a .? u d' ? F? ..a O U N `-' F O W x Q) N O O LC) PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS 1560 Asheville Rd. Haywood Elec. Corp. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 Haywood Services Corp..lnc. 300 North Haywood St. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 1449 Asheville Rd. James and Nancy Francis Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2228 Asheville Rd. Joe H Elise D Palmer Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2238 Asheville Rd. Haywood Co. Consolidated School System Waynesville, N. C. 2 8 7 8 6 2566 Asheville Rd. Plemmons Plumbing and Heating Waynesville, N.C. 28786 l Welch Farm Rd. William and Alice Gregory Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2489 Asheville Rd. Haywood Christian Ministry Inc. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 541 Peace Mountain Rd. David C. and Lynda B. Blevins Waynesville, N.C. 28786 Main Street The Champion Paper and Fiber Co. Can ton, N.C. 28716 HAWbob AbVAUGµE1JT T--pjb^r,o&/ 14q WDu5T0pU.?- PAAk 10R. W4YNESYILL E /)VDUs IAL PA V k ,I/VC LJAyNEd%/1L E, Me- Ze78lc N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 RE-4. 02 -i v l SHEET Z3 OF?! 10/15/99 o g W NN? ?'2 ? 12 ? I L U. m O Z W V M E N wV ? CY) O a yQ 2SE ti o ? ? N H U r ? U 0 r N C7 N U H IL ° O w a5 a _ 3 _ o° 8 N ? Eu i? o 0 0 0 ? U F g O Z y ? O N W U N VC ?p C O L 0 0 0 0 111 0: U) ? A. N ca D 0p 0 0 0G 0 c Z O O C O _ d c U) U `o g ? Q ? ?3 a ? C O G 1t.'s., N Q Q Q Q i :1 0? Q 3 3 Z 3 3 m _ o N C Q y Q Q Q Q 3 2 2 2 z 9 't fV o q 8 61 Q 0 0 ? U of ri vi Q N N N Q N - - - - - - - - O J r Y - J ? } - 0 - J - - - + co y LL a + ) ? + 0 a ? O co f t m I <p ° ? N N N fn O •- N M a J H O H []Pwd: R-2210A SP's] Subject: [Fwd: R-2210A SP's] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:43:32 -0400 From: Alice Gordon <agordon @dot. state.nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: Mike Parker <Mike.Parker@ncmail.net> CC: Cynthia VanDer Wiele <cynthia.vanderwiele@ncmail.net>, Randy Turner <mrturner@dot.state.nc.us> Mike, I have attached the revisions in the Seeding Plan and the Live Stakeing that you requested. Specifically please see the sections entitled: Seeding in Riparian Areas As you requested we eliminated fescue and bluegrass from the riparian mixture and used Orchard Grass, Switchgrass, landino clover and millet (exact mixtures dependant on season). Live Staking: Also as you requested, we increased the diversity of species in the Live Staking by adding Buttonbush, hazel alder, and rough-leaved dogwood. The attachment is in Acrobat. If you want me to fax you a copy please let me know. Thank you for all your help and work on this project. Alice Gordon Subject: R-2210A SP's Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:25:27 -0400 From: Mark Staley <mstaley @dot. state.nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: Alice Gordon <agordon@dot.state.nc.us> Alice, Here is the entire set of E.C. Special Provisions for R-2210A in Haywood County. Let me know if you do not receive them or have other questions concerning this project. Mark Staley Name: R_2210A.pdf ?R2210A.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf) Encoding: base64 Download Status: Not downloaded with message [Fwd: R-2210A SP's] Alice Gordon <agordon@dot.state.nc.us> Envir. Spec. II Project Development & Environmental Analysis I of 18 8.1942902 Seeding And Mulching: Project Special Provisions Erosion Control (8) The kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and limestone, shall be as stated below. During periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall be determined by the Engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre (kilograms per hectare). August 1 - June 1 May 1 - September 1 20# (23kg) Kentucky Bluegrass 20# (23kg) Kentucky Bluegrass 75# (8kg) Hard Fescue 75# (84kg) Hard Fescue 500# (560kg) Fertilizer 25# (28kg) German or Browntop Millet 4000# (4500kg) Limestone 500# (560kg) Fertilizer 4000# (4500kg) Limestone All areas adjacent to lawns must be hand finished as directed by the Engineer to give a "lawn type appearance". Remove all trash, debris, and stones'/o inch (19 mm) and larger in diameter or other obstructions that could interfere with providing a smooth `lawn type appearance' Approved Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars: Adelphi Baron Bristol Challenger Columbia Fylking Glade Kenblue Merit Plush Ram I Rugby Sydsport Touchdown Vantage Approved Hard Fescue Cultivars: Aurora Bardur Crystal Reliant Scaldis Spartan Valda Waldina Warwick On cut and fill slopes 2:1 or steeper add 25# (28kg) Rye Grain August 1 - June 1. On cut and fill slopes 2:1 or steeper add 30# (35 kg) Sericea Lespedeza January 1 - December 31. 08/29/01 Haywood County Fertilizer shall be 10-20-20 analysis. Upon written approval of the Engineer, a different analysis of fertilizer may be used provided the 1-2-2 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant food as a 10-20-20 analysis. 2of18 Seeding in Riparian Areas: 08/29/01 The following seed mix shall be used to seed the 25 foot (8 meter) wide riparian areas adjacent to the relocated streams at Sta. 16+71 to 19+34 -L- Rt. and Sta. 28+80 to 32+00 -L- Lt. The kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and limestone, shall be as stated below. During periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall be determined by the engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre (kilograms per hectare). August 1 - June 1 50# (56kg) Orchard Grass 20# (23kg) Switchgrass 15# (17kg) Ladino Clover 500# (560kg) Fertilizer 4000# (4500kg) Limestone May 1 - September 1 50# (56kg) 20# (23kg) 15# (17kg) 25# (28kg) 500# (560kg) 4000# (4500kg) Temporary. Seeding: Orchard Grass Switchgrass Ladino Clover Japanese Millet Fertilizer Limestone Fertilizer shall be the same analysis as specified for "Seeding and Mulching" and applied at the rate of 400 pounds (450kg) and seeded at the rate of 50 pounds per acre (55kg per hectare). German Millet, or Browntop Millet shall be used in summer months and rye grain during the remainder of the year. The Engineer will determine the exact dates for using each kind of seed. Fertilizer Topdressing: Fertilizer used for topdressing shall be 16-8-8 grade and shall be applied at the rate of 500 pounds per acre (560 kg per hectare). Upon written approval of the Engineer, a different analysis of fertilizer may be used provided the 2-1-1 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant food as 16-8-8 analysis. Supplemental Seeding: The kinds of seed and proportions shall be the same as specified for "Seeding and Mulching", and the rate of application may vary from 25# to 75# per acre (28kg to 85kg per hectare). The actual rate per acre (hectare) will be determined by the Engineer prior to the time of topdressing and the Contractor will be notified in writing of the rate per acre (hectare), total quantity needed, and areas on which to apply the supplemental seed. Minimum tillage equipment, consisting of a sod seeder shall be used for incorporating seed into the soil as to prevent disturbance of existing vegetation. A clodbuster (ball and chain) may be used where degree of slope prevents the use of a sod seeder. Mowing: The minimum mowing height on this project shall be six inches (150 mm). 3 of 18 08/29/01 Specialized Hand Mowing: The work covered by this section consists of specialized hand mowing around or under fixed objects, including but not limited to guardrails, signs, barriers and slopes in a method acceptable to the Engineer. The work of specialized hand mowing shall be completed with mechanically powered trimmers, string trimmers, hand operated rotary mowers, or self-propelled mowers of sufficient size and quality to perform the work timely and efficiently. The quantity of mowing to be performed will be affected by the actual conditions which occur during the construction of the project. The quantity of mowing may be increased, decreased or eliminated entirely at the direction of the Engineer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of construction or a change in the character of the work. The quantity of specialized hand mowing to be paid for will be the actual number of man hours worked while hand mowing along the surface of the ground, at the direction of the Engineer. Where an area has been mowed more than once, at the direction of the Engineer, separate measurement will be made each time the area is mowed. Payment will be made under: Specialized Hand Mowing ............................................................................... HR Culvert Diversion Channel: Description: Provide a culvert diversion channel to detour existing stream around the culvert construction site at locations shown on the plans. Work includes constructing diversion channel, disposing of excess materials, providing and placing filter fabric liner, maintaining diversion area in an acceptable condition, removing filter fabric liner, backfilling diversion channel area with suitable material and providing proper drainage when diversion channel area is abandoned. Material: Use local material or material specified on plans. Provide filter fabric to meet requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2 fabric. Construction requirements: Grade channel according to plan with channel surface free of obstructions, debris, and pockets of low density material. 4 of 18 08/29/01 Utilize suitable material and provide disposal area for unsuitable material. Line channel with fabric unrolled in the direction of flow and lay smoothly but loosely on soil surface without creases. Bury top of slope fabric edge in a trench at least five inches (125mm) deep and tamp. Make vertical overlaps a minimum of eighteen inches (450mm) with upstream fabric overlapping the downstream fabric. Secure fabric with eleven gauge (3.05mm) wire staples shaped into a "u" shape with a length of not less than six inches (150mm) and a throat not less than one inch (25mm) in width. Place staples along outer edges and throughout the fabric a maximum of three feet (one meter) horizontally and vertically. Method of Measurement: Measurement of excavation will be made by the cubic yard (cubic meter) of excavation as calculated from the typical section throughout the length of the diversion channel as shown on the final approved plans. Measurement of filter fabric will be made by the number of square yards (square meters) as measured over the surface of the ground over which filter fabric has been acceptably placed. No measurement will be made for other items or for over excavation or stockpiling. Basis of Payment: Payment will be made for the quantities as measured above under the items listed below: Culvert Diversion Channel ...................................................................... CY (M3) Filter Fabric for Drainage ......................................................................... SY (M2) Impervious Dike: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing, maintaining, and removing an impervious dike for the purpose of diverting normal stream flow around the construction site. The Contractor shall construct an impervious dike in such a manner approved by the Engineer. The impervious dike shall not permit seepage of water into the construction site or contribute to siltation of the stream. The impervious dike shall be constructed of an acceptable material in the locations noted on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. Acceptable materials shall include but not be limited to sheet piles, sandbags, and/or the placement of an acceptable size stone lined with polypropylene or other impervious fabric. 5of18 08/29/01 Earth material shall not be used to construct an impervious dike when it is in direct contact with the stream unless vegetation can be established before contact with the stream takes place. The quantity of impervious dike to be paid for will be the actual number of linear feet (meters) of impervious dike(s) constructed, measured in place from end to end of each separate installation which has been completed and accepted. The quantity of impervious dikes measured as provided above will be paid for at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter) for "Impervious Dike". The above prices and payments will be full compensation for all work covered by this section including but not limited to furnishing all of the materials in the impervious dike, construction, maintenance, and removal of the impervious dike. Waste Areas And Borrow Sources: Payment for temporary erosion control measures, except those made necessary by the Contractor's own negligence or for his own convenience, will be paid for at the appropriate contract unit price for the devices or measures utilized in borrow sources and waste areas. No additional payment will be made for erosion control devices or permanent seeding' and mulching in any commercial borrow or waste pit. All erosion and sediment control practices which may be required on a commercial borrow or waste site will be done at the Contractor's expense. Temporary Diversion: The work by this section for installation, maintenance, and cleanout of temporary diversions shall be in accordance with Section 1630. The quantity of excavation for installation and cleanout measured as provided in Article 1630-4 will be paid for at the contract unit price per cubic yard (cubic meter) as provided in Article 1630-5 for "Silt Excavation". Special Sediment Control Fence: Description: The work covered by this section consists of the construction, maintenance, and removal of special sediment control fence. Build special sediment control fence according to the detail located on the plans. Place special sediment control fence as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. 6of18 Materials: (A) Posts: 08/29/01 Either wood or steel posts may be used. Wood posts shall be a minimum of 6 feet long (1.8 m), at least 3 inches (75 mm) in diameter, and straight enough to provide a fence without noticeable misalignment. Steel posts shall be at least 5 feet (1.5 m) in length, approximately 13/8 inches (35 mm) wide measured parallel to the fence, and have a minimum weight of 1.25 lb/ft (1.86 kg/m) of length. The post shall be equipped with an anchor plate having a minimum area of 14.0 square inches (9000 square millimeters), and shall have a means of retaining wire in the desired position without displacement. (B) 1/4 inch (6.4mm) Hardware Cloth: Hardware cloth shall have 1/4 inch (6.4mm) openings constructed from #24 gauge wire. Install hardware cloth according to the detail shown on the plans. (C) Sediment Control Stone: Sediment control stone shall meet the requirements of Section 1005. Install stone according to the detail shown on the plans. Maintenance and Removal: The Contractor shall maintain the special sediment control fence until the project is accepted or until the fence is removed, and shall remove and dispose of silt accumulations at the fence when so directed by the Engineer in accordance with Section 1630. Method of Measurement: The quantity of 1/4 inch (6.4mm) hardware cloth to be paid for will be the actual number of linear feet (meters) measured along the ground, which has been completed and accepted. The quantity of sediment control stone will be measured according to Article 1610-4. Basis of Payment: Payment for special sediment control fence will be as follows: 1/4 inch (6.4mm) Hardware Cloth .................................................................... LF (M) Sediment Control Stone ............................................................................. TON (MT) 7of18 Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat: General: 08/29/01 This work shall consist of furnishing and placing "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat", of the type specified, over previously prepared areas as directed by the Engineer. Materials: The product shall be permanent erosion control reinforcement mat and shall be constructed of 100% coconut fiber stitch bonded between a he avy duty UV stabilized cuspated (crimped) netting overlaid with a heavy duty UV stabilized top net, The three nettings shall be stitched together on 1.5 inch (38 mm) centers UV stabilized polyester thread to form a permanent three dimensional structure. The m at shall have the following physical properties: Property Test Method Value Unit Ground Cover Image Analysis 93 % Thickness ASTM D1777 0:63 (16) in (mm) Mass Per Unit Area ASTM D3776 0.92 (0.50) lb/sy (kg/m2) Tensile Strength ASTM D5035 480 (714.2) lb/ft (kg/m) Elongation ASTM D5035 49 % Tensile Strength ASTM D5035 960 (1428.5) lb/ft (kg/m) Elongation ASTM D5035 31 % Tensile Strength ASTM D1682 177 (80.3) lbs (kg) Elongation ASTM D1682 22 % Resiliency ASTM D1777 >80 % UV Stability * ASTM D4355 151 (68.5) lbs (kg) Color(Permanent Net) UV Black Porosity (Permanent Net) Calculated >95 % Minimum Filament Measured 0.03 (0.8) in (mm) Diameter (permanent net) *ASTM D1682 Tensile Strength and % strength retention of material after 1000 hours of exposure in a Xenon-arc weatherometer. A certification (Type 1, 2, or 3) from the manufacturer showing: 1) the chemical and physical properties of the mat used, and 2) conformance of the mat with this specification will be required. Soil Preparation: All areas to be protected with the mat shall be brought to final grade and seeded in accordance with Section 1660. The surface of the soil shall be smooth, firm, stable and free of rocks, clods, roots or other obstructions which would prevent the mat from lying 8 of 18 08/29/01 in direct contact with the soil surface. Areas where the mat is to be placed will not need to be mulched. Measurement: The quantity of "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat" to be paid for shall be the actual number of square yards (square meters), surface measure, completed, and accepted. Overlaps will not be included in the measurement, and will be considered as incidental to the work. Basis of Payment: This work will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat" of the type specified, complete in place and accepted. Such payment shall be full compensation for furnishing and installing the mat in accordance with this specification, and for all required maintenance. Payment will be made under: Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat ................................ ................................ SY (M2) Sodding (Zoysia): General: Sod shall be placed under all guiderail and all guardrail sections in accordance with detail for "Sodding Placement Under New Guardrail/Guiderail" and as directed by the Engineer. Sod shall be placed so that there is symmetry between the portion of the sod behind the guardrail post and in front of the face of the guardrail. No sod shall be placed where suitable stands of centipede exist as determined by the Engineer. The sodding shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable requirements of Section 1663 of the Standard Specifications and the following provisions: The Contractor shall obtain a certificate or limited permit issued by The N.C. Department of Agriculture (1-800-206-9333) or (919-733-6932) stating that the sod has been found to be free of injurious plant pests. Materials: Only "approved sod" (trade designation) consisting of zoysiagrass shall be used. Approved zoysiagrass cultivars shall be from the following list or from other cultivars approved by the Engineer. Meyer El-Toro 9 of 18 08/29/01 The sod, machine cut to the suppliers standard width and length, shall be 5/8 inch (16 mm) minimum, excluding top growth and thatch, at the time of cutting. Before cutting, the sod shall be uniformly mowed at a height of 3/4"to 1"(19-25 mm). Standard sod sections shall be sufficiently strong to support their own weight and retain their size and shape when suspended vertically from a firm grasp on the upper 10% of the section. Sod shall be delivered on site within 24 hours of being cut and be covered by acceptable means during delivery. A certificate from the sod producer stating the date and time of sod cutting shall accompany the sod when it arrives at the project site. Under sections where new median guardrail/guiderail is to be installed only 42 inch (1067 mm) wide roll sod is to be used. Other areas requiring sod may be either 42 inch (1067 mm) wide roll sod or 18 inch by 36 inch (457 mm by 914 mm) strips as long as a 36 inch (914 mm) minimum width is placed under the guardrail/ guiderail. Soil Preparation: Remove litter and other debris. Mow and satisfactorily dispose of weeds or other unacceptable growth on the areas to be sodded. Prior to beginning preparation of the soil to receive sod, all eroded, uneven and rough areas shall be contour graded and/or filled with soil as directed by the Engineer. The soil shall be scarified or otherwise loosened to a depth of not less than 5 inches (130 mm) with a maximum width of 48 inches (1145 mm). Clods shall be broken and the top 2 to 3 inches (52'to 78 mm) of soil shall be worked into an acceptable soil bed by the use of soil pulverizers, drags, or harrows. After soil preparation, lime and fertilizer shall be uniformly distributed by mechanical means using a 42 inch (1065 mm) drop type spreader and thoroughly mixed with the top five inches (130 mm) of the soil by discing, harrowing, or other approved methods. The rates of limestone and fertilizer per acre (hectare) is as follows: 500# (560 kg) 10-20-20 Fertilizer 4000# (4485 kg) Limestone The area shall then be harrowed, dragged, raked, or prepared by other approved methods which will give a lawn type finish. All trash, debris and stones larger than 1-1/2 inch (38 mm) in diameter or other obstructions that could interfere with the placing of the sod shall also be removed. The finished surface shall be moistened with water prior to placing the sod as directed by the Engineer. 10 of 18 Placement: 08/29/01 Sod handling and placement shall be a continuous process of cutting, transporting and installing including repairing seams and voids. Sod shall always be installed within 48 hours after being cut. Sod shall be watered within 2 hours of installation. Any sod or portions of sod rejected by the Engineer during the initial placement shall be removed from the project and replaced with acceptable sod immediately. The Contractor shall cease any and all other placement of sod on the project until rejected sod has been replaced. After sod has been placed, and staked where necessary, according to Section 1663, it shall then be rolled or tamped carefully and firmly by means acceptable to the Engineer to ensure proper soil contact. If rolled, roller shall weigh 150#1ft (224kg/m) of roller width. Use of rubber tired equipment to roll shall not be allowed. Metal staples, 12 inches (305 mm) long unless otherwise approved, shall be made of 11 gauge (3.0 mm diameter) new steel wire so as not to bend when pinned or driven through the sod. Extreme care shall be taken to prevent the installed sod from being torn or displaced. After rolling or tamping the sod, it shall be watered uniformly and thoroughly with a minimum of 1 inch of water (5.6 gallons per square yard (25 liters per square meter) applied immediately after installation of sod. In no case shall the time interval between sod placement and initial watering exceed 2 hours. Water shall be placed to the required quantity through sequential passes to insure proper coverage and to prevent runoff. A, minimum of/a inch (6.4 mm) should be placed on each pass. Maintenance: The Contractor shall be responsible for all watering and other maintenance required to maintain the livability and health of the sod from installation until completion of the 60 day observation period. Additional water shall be applied as needed and as directed by the Engineer to maintain the livability of the sod. Each additional watering event shall be a minimum of 0.5 inch of water (2.8 gallons per square yard (13 liters per square meter)) uniformly applied over the sodded area and may be placed in a series of passes to prevent runoff, with a minimum of/a inch (6.4 mm) on each pass. Any sod or portions of sod rejected by the Engineer after placement but prior to beginning the observation period, shall be removed from the project and replaced with acceptable sod. Satisfactory replacement of sod shall begin within 10 days of notification. Failure to replace and repair damaged or dead sod as directed by the Engineer may result in sanctions under Article 108-7 or Article 108-8. Observation Period: The Contractor shall maintain responsibility for the sod for a 60 day observation period beginning upon the satisfactory completion and acceptance of all work required in the plans or as directed by the Engineer. The Contractor shall guarantee the sod under the payment and performance bond, refer to Article 109-10 in the standard specifications. 11 of 18 08/29/01 In the following counties, the 60 day observation period for sod installed between Augus 31 and March 1, shall not begin until March 1: Alexander Catawba Jackson Surry Alleghany Cherokee Macon Swain Ashe Clay Madison Transylvania Avery Graham McDowell Watauga Buncombe Haywood Mitchell Wilkes Burke Henderson Polk Yadkin Caldwell Iredell Rutherford Yancey Installation of sod shall be permitted between August 31 and March 1, however, the Engineer shall not accept such work and begin the 60 day observation period prior to March 1. Upon satisfactory completion of work and acceptance by the Engineer, the 60 day observation period shall begin. In all other counties, the 60 day observation period for sod installed between a tember 30 and March 1, shall not begin until March 1. The Contractor shall be responsible year round for all watering and other maintenance required to maintain the livability of the sod from installation until final acceptance including monitoring the sod to ensure all watering and other maintenance is performed as required. After the first 30 days of the 60 day observation period, the Contractor and Engineer shall meet to review the project and identify dead or damaged sod to be replaced. The Contractor, at no additional expense to the Department, shall satisfactorily replace any sod that is not in a living and healthy condition as determined by the Engineer. Replacement sod shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the same requirements as for initial sodding operation, except that the amounts of limestone, sulfur, and water may be readjusted as directed by the Engineer. Satisfactory replacement of sod shall begin within 10 days of notification. Failure to replace and repair damaged or dead sod as directed by the Engineer may result in sanctions under Article 108-7 or Article 108-8. Upon completion and acceptance of the sod repairs, the remaining 30 days of the observation period shall begin. Acceptance: At the end of the 60 day observation period, the sod furnished and installed under this contract must be in a living and healthy condition, as determined by the Engineer. Acceptance of sod will be either at the end of the 60 day observation period or at final acceptance of the project, which ever is later. Sodding shall be inspected by the Area Roadside Environmental Engineer to begin and end the 60 day observation period. 12 of 18 08/29/01 The sod shall be weed free at time of final acceptance. Payment: Payment and measurement shall be in accordance with Section 1663 of the Standard Specifications. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: This project is located in an "Environmentally Sensitive Area". This designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings, and grading operations within the area identified on the plans. This also requires special procedures to be used for seeding and mulching and staged seeding within the project. Clearing and Grubbing: In areas identified on the erosion control plans as "Environmentally Sensitive Areas". the Contractor may perform clearing operations, but not grubbing operations until immediately prior to beginning grading operations as described in Section 200, Article 200-1, in the Standard Specifications. The `Environmentally Sensitive Area" shall be defined as a 50 foot (16 meter) buffer zone on both sides of the stream (or depression), measured from top of streambank, (or center of depression). Only clearing operations (not grubbing) shall be allowed in this buffer zone until immediately prior to beginning grading operations. Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation. Grading: Once grading operations begin in identified "Environmentally Sensitive Areas", work will progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction within these areas must progress in a continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas permanently stabilized prior to beginning of next phase. Failure on the part of the Contractor to complete any phase of construction in a continuous manner in "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" as specified will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of work in accordance with Section 108-7 of the Standard Specifications. Temporary Stream Crossings: Any crossing of streams within the limits of this project must be accomplished in accordance with Section 107-13(b) of the Standard Specifications. Seeding and Mulching: Seeding and mulching shall be performed in accordance with Section 1660 of the Standard Specifications and vegetative cover sufficient to restrain erosion shall be installed immediately following grade establishment. 13 of 18 08/29/01 Seeding and mulching shall be performed on the areas disturbed by construction immediately following final grade establishment. No appreciable time shall lapse into the contract time without stabilization of slopes, ditches and other areas within the "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" as indicated on the E.C. Plans. Stage Seeding: The work covered by this section shall consist of the establishment of a vegetative cover on cut and fill slopes as grading progresses. Seeding and mulching shall be done in stages on cut and fill slopes which are greater than 20 feet (6 meters) in height or greater than 2 acres (0.8 hectares) in area. Each stage shall not exceed the limits stated above. All work described above will be paid for at the contract unit prices established in the contract for the work involved. Additional payments will not be made for the requirements of this section as the cost for this work should be included in the contract unit prices for the work involved. Gravel Construction Entrance: Description: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing, and maintaining and removing any and all material required for, the construction of a Gravel Construction Entrance. Materials: The filter fabric shall meet the requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2 Fabric. Stone shall be Class A Stone and shall meet the requirements of Section 1042 for Stone for Erosion Control, Class A. Construction: The Contractor shall install a Gravel Construction Entrance in accordance with the details in the plans and at locations as directed by the Engineer. Method Of Measurement: Gravel Construction Entrance will not be measured for payment under this section. Basis Of Payment: Payment for installation of Filter Fabric shall be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard `Filter Fabric for Drainage' 14 of 18 08/29/01 Payment for installation of Class A Stone shall be paid for at the contract unit price per ton `Stone for Erosion Control, Class A". Such price and payment shall be considered full compensation for all work covered by this provision including all materials, construction, maintenance, and removal of Gravel Construction Entrance as directed by the Engineer. Minimize Removal Of Vegetation: The Contractor shall minimize removal of vegetation at stream banks and disturbed areas within the project limits as directed by the Engineer. Stream Channel Relocation Limitations: The following sequence of construction must be followed in the areas designated on the plans as stream relocation. Failure on the part of the Contractor to follow this sequence, and complete each step prior to proceeding in this area as specified, will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of work in accordance with Section 108-7 of the Standard Specifications. I . Clear, but do not grub area within the Environmentally Sensitive Area on the existing stream to be relocated. 2. Construct and stabilize, with vegetation or,erosion control material, the proposed stream channel relocation as shown on the plans. 3. Divert water into newly constructed channel only after it has been stabilized and approved. 4. Begin grubbing and/or grading within Environmentally Sensitive Area of existing stream. The above requirements apply to the stream channels being constructed at the following stations: Sta. 16+71 to 19+34 -L- Rt. Sta. 28+80 to 32+00 -L- Lt. Rootwads: The Contractor shall identify and stockpile rootwads encountered during Clearing and Grubbing. These shall be used to stabilize the streambank after its construction. Rootwads to be used forstreambank stabilization should have a trunk diameter of 0.3 to 0.45 meters and should have 3 meters of the trunk length remaining. The Contractor, upon removal of the trunk and root, shall remove soil to the extent acceptable to the Engineer. Care shall be taken to preserve the root structure and shown on the detail in the plans. 15 of 18 Method of Measurement: 08/29/01 The quantity of rootwads measured will be paid for according to the actual number of rootwads each, as installed and accepted by the Engineer. Basis of Payment: The quantity of rootwads, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per each for "Rootwads". The above prices and payments will be full compensation for all work covered by this section, including but not limited to excavation, furnishing and installing all rootwads, footer logs, cut-off logs, anchor rocks, and fill material. Payment will be made under: Rootwads .......................................................................................................... EACH Coir Fiber Mat: Description: Furnish material, install and maintain coir fiber mat in locations shown on the plans or in locations as directed by the engineer. Work includes providing all materials, excavating and backfilling, and placing and securing Coir Fiber Matting. Materials: (A) Matting: Provide matting to meet the following requirements: 100 % coconut fiber (c Thickness - Tensile Strength - Elongation - Flexibility (mg-cm)- Flow Velocity- Weight - Size - "C" Factor - Open Area (measured) - (B) Staples: oir) twine woven into a high strength matrix. 0.30 in. minimum. (7.6 mm) 1348 x 626 lb/ft minimum (1650.5 x 766.5 kg/m) 34% x 38% maximum 65030 x 29590 Observed 11 ft/sec (3.35 m/s) 20 oz/SY (678 g/SM) 6.6 x 164 ft (120 SY) or (100 SM) 0.002 50% Provide staples made of 0.125 in. (3.05 mm) diameter new steel wire formed into a `U" shape not less than 12 in. (300) mm in length with a throat of 1 in. (25 mm) in width. 16 of 18 Construction Methods: 08/29/01 Place the matting immediately upon final grading. Provide a smooth soil surface free from stones, clods, or debris which will prevent the contact of the matting with the soil. Take care to preserve the required line, grade, and cross section of the area covered. Unroll the matting and apply without stretching such that it will lie smoothly but loosely on the soil surface. Bury the top slope end of each piece of matting in a narrow trench at least 6 in. (150 mm) deep and tamp firmly. Where one roll of matting ends and a second roll begins, overlap the end of the upper roll over the buried end of the second roll so there is a 6 in. (150 mm) overlap. Construct check trenches at least 12 in. (0.3 m) deep every 50 ft. (16 m) longitudinally along the edges of the matting or as directed by the Engineer. Fold over and bury matting to the full depth of the trench, close and tamp firmly. Overlap matting at least 6 in. (150 mm) where 2 or more widths of matting are installed side by side. Place staples across the matting at ends, junctions, and check trenches approximately 1 ft. (0.3 m) apart. Place staples along the outer edges and down the center of each strip of matting 3 feet (1 meter) apart. Place staples along all lapped edges 1 ft. (0.3 m) apart. The Engineer may require adjustments in the trenching or stapling requirements to fit individual site conditions. Method of Measurement: The quantity of coir fiber matting measured will be paid for according to the actual number of square yard (square meters) measured along the surface of the ground over which coin fiber matting is installed and accepted. Basis of Payment: The quantity of Coir Fiber Matting, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for "Coir Fiber Matting." Payment will be made under: Coir Fiber Matting ................................ . ........ Square Yard (Square Meter) Live Staking: Description: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing and maintaining live stakes as shown on the plans or in locations as directed by the Engineer. Work includes providing all materials necessary to install the live stake cuttings. 17 of 18 08/29/01 Materials: Live staking plant material shall consist of a random mix made up of Willow (Salix sp.), Red-osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera), Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum), Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Hazel Alder (Alnus serrulata), and Roughleaf Dogwood (Cornus drummondii). Other species may be substituted upon approval of Engineer. All plant material shall be harvested locally (within the same physiographic ecoregion and plant hardiness zone) or purchased from a local nursery, with the approval of the Engineer. All live stakes shall be dormant at time of acquisition and planting. Live stakes shall be installed between November 15 and March 15. - - Live stakes shall be 1/2-2" (12-50 mm) in diameter. Stakes shall also be 2 - 3 feet (.6 - 1 meter) in length. During preparation, the basal ends of the live stakes shall be cleanly cut at an angle to facilitate easy insertion into the soil, while the tops shall be cut square or blunt for tamping. All limbs shall be removed from the sides of the live cutting prior to installation. Installation: Live stakes shall be installed within 48 hours of cutting. Outside storage locations should be continually shaded and protected from wind and direct sunlight. Live cut plant material shall remain moist at all times before planting. Install live stakes according to the details in the plan sheets. Tamp live stakes perpendicularly into the finished bank slope with a dead blow hammer, with buds oriented in an upward direction. Stakes should be tamped until approximately 3/4 of the stake length is within the ground. The area around each live stake shall be compacted by foot after the live stake has been installed. Stakes shall be spaced approximately four (4) feet on center. Live stakes should be installed according to the configuration presented in the details of the plan sheets. One to two inches shall be cut cleanly off of the top of each live stake (with lopers) at an angle of approximately 15 degrees following installation. Any stakes that are split or damaged during installation shall be removed and replaced. 18 of 18 Method of Measurement: 08/29/01 The quantity of live staking measured and accepted, will be paid for at the contract unit bid price per square yard (square meter) for 'Live Staking". Basis of Payment: The quantity of live staking, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for 'Live Staking". The above prices and payments will be considered full compensation for all work covered by this Section, including but not limited to furnishing, and installing all live stakes. Payment will be made under: Live Staking ................................................................................................... Sy (M2) R D 1 Uri 6_9 Y CL (? UYOC)? U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id.: 20043 1 1 65 County: Haymood Quad: C yAe GENERAL. PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Responsible Party: North Carolina Department of Transportation Attn: Mark Davis, DEO Address: 253 Webster Road WETLANDS 1401 (;ROW Sylva, North Carolina 228779 Telephone: (828) 586-2141 ?004 Cc (without enclosures): Mr. Brian Wrenn Division of Water Quality WATER OLIALI'IY SECTION North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Decimal Degrees: North: 35.51630 West: 83.96570 Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The project is located southwest of the intersection of US 23 Business and SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), under and northwest of the Norfolk Southern Railway Line, in an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek, north of Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina. TIP No. R2210A Description of Activity: Temporary discharge of fill material into approximately 0.05 acre of jurisdictional wetlands and 8 linear feet of perennial stream associated with the staging of equipment to bore a new pipe under the railway line and tie back into the stream. This permit does not authorize the permanent discharge of fill material. Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344) (check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbors Act of 1899) Authorization: NATIONWIDE PERMIT #3: Maintenance NATIONWIDE PERMIT # 33: Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering Special Conditions a) All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the plans received in this office on July 1, 2004, which are a part of this permit. Any modification to these plans must be approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) prior to implementation. b) Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land-clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition applies to all borrow and fill activities connected with this project. C) Except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land-clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this project, in such a manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns within waters or wetlands or to reduce the reach of waters or R wetlands d) All conditions of the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission letter of June 9, 2004 are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit. See attached documents for additional terms and conditions of this Nationwide Permit. Your work is authorized by this Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, telephone (919) 733-1786. For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone (919) 733-2293. Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the NWP. Any violation of the conditions of the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This Department of the Army NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. This verification will remain valid until 19 July 2006 unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked. If, prior to 19 July 2006 the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until 19 July 2006, provided it complies with all modifications. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the Nationwide Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below. Date: 19 -hily 2004 Corps Regulatory Official: Angie ennock d-- Telephone No.: (899) 271-7980 ext. 226 Expiration Date of Verification: 19 my 2006 SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE. CESAW Form 591 Revised July 1995 WAIF Michael F. Easley, Governor 40 9PG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality O `f DWQ Project No.: 010409 County: Haywood Applicant: NCDOT Project Name: TIP No. R-2210A US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: September 6, 2001 Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 /Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, Joel B. Setzer, P.E., hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and othe su portin terials. Signature: Date: 1/ O Agent's C ification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: If this project was designed by a Certified Professional I, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permitee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. Date: s A F11,1(ar 31l North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ Page 2 PROJECT SCOPING SHEET Features of Proposed Facility Type of Facility: MULTI-LANE Type of Access Control: Full Partial None X Type of Roadway: Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 1 Typical Section of Roadway: 5-LANE CURB AND GUTTER (UNDIVIDED) Traffic: Current 9.200 vpd Design Year 16,560 vpd Design Standards Applicable: AASHTO Design Speed: 50 MPH Preliminary Resurfacing Design: Preliminary Pavement Design: Current Cost Estimate: Construction Cost (including engineering and contingencies). . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,450,000 Right of Way Cost (including rel., util., and acquisition). . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,200,000 Force Account Items. . . . . . . . . . . . $ Preliminary Engineering. . . . . . . . . . $ Prior Years Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 250,000 Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,650,000 TIP Cost Estimate: Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,450,000 Right of Way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,200,000 Prior Years Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 250,000 Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,650,000 List any special features, such as railroad involvement, which could affect cost or schedule of project: Page 3 PROJECT SCOPING SHEET ITEMS REQUIRED ( ) COMMENTS COST Estimated Costs of Improvements: Pavement Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Milling & Recycling . . . . . . . . . Turnouts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shoulders: Paved. . . . . . . . . . . Earth. . . . . . . . . . . Earthwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subsurface Items: . . . . . . . . . . . . Subgrade and Stabilization. . . . . . . . Drainage (List any special items) . . . . Sub-Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Structures: Width x Length Bridge Rehabilitation x New Bridge x Widen Bridge x Remove Bridge x New Culverts: Size Length Fill Ht. Culvert Extension Retaining Walls: Type Ave. Ht. Skew _ Noise Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Any Other Misc. Structures. . . . . . . . Concrete Curb & Gutter. . . . . . . . . . . Concrete Sidewalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . Guardrail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fencing: W.W. and/or C.L. . . . Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Traffic Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Signing: New . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upgrading. . . . . . . . . . . Traffic Signals: New . . . . . . . . . Revised . . . . . . . RR Signals: New . . . . . . . . . . . . Revised . . . . . . . . . . With or Without Arms. . . . If 3R: Drainage Safety Enhancement. . . Roadside Safety Enhancement. . . Realignment for Safety Upgrade . Pavement Markings: Paint Thermo Markers $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Delineators . . $ Other . . $ CONTRACT COST (Subtotal): $ Page 4 PROJECT SCOPING SHEET Contingencies & Engineering . . . . . . . . . . $ PE Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Force Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Subtotal: $ Right of Way: Will Contain within Exist Right of Way: Yes Existing Right of Way Width: 60 New Right of Way Needed: Width Est. Cost $ Easements: Type Width Est. Cost $ Utilities: $ No Right of Way Subtotal: $ Total Estimated Cost (Includes R/W): $ Prepared By: Date: The above scoping has been reviewed and approved* by: Highway Design Roadway Structure Design Services Geotechnical Hydraulics Loc. & Surveys Photogrammetry Prel. Est. Engr. Planning & Environ. Right of Way R/W Utilities Traffic Engineering Project Management County Manager City/Municipality Others INIT. DATE Board of Tran. Member Mgr. Program & Policy Chief Engineer-Precons Chief Engineer-Oper Secondary Roads Off. Construction Branch Roadside Environmental Maintenance Branch Bridge Maintenance Statewide Planning Division Engineer Bicycle Coordinator Program Development FHWA Dept. of Cult. Res. Dept. of EH & NR INIT. DATE Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineer for handling. Comments or Remarks: *If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping, note your proposed revisions in Comments or Remarks Section and initial and date after comments. 7_ A NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Michael F. Easley, Governor July 29, 2004 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director NC DOT - PDEA 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 Dear Dr. Thorpe: William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director This letter is to inform you that the biological monitoring requirements for the projects listed below are considered complete based on the criteria listed iti the Interim, Internal Technical Guide Summaryfor Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring f rotocols for Compensatory Stream Restoration and Enhancement Level 1 Projects. TIP Project No. Site No. R-2206A Site 1 Site 2 R 2239C Site 3 - Sites 4, 5, and 6 Site 7 Site 8 R 2210A Site 1 - Site 2 U-2827A 401 Transportation Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NofthCarohna Phone: 919-733-1786 / FAX 919-733-6893 / Internet: http:/th2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands -Al -.t - - _. - //, , No further biological monitoring is required for these projects for one of the two following reasons: 1) The project is included in the 80 level 1 projects referenced in Part I. Regulatory Requirements of the technical guide. 2) In DWQ's opinion, the project has met the requirements of the permit based on biological monitoring that has been completed to date. Satisfaction of the biological monitoring requirements based on these two reasons is applicable only to the projects listed above and should not be applied to current or future projects without approval from the DWQ. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694. S' ely, Alan W. Kliri'ek, P.E. Cc: Phillip Todd, NC DOT - O Phil Harris, NC DOT - ONE File Copy r d STAif o ?0 r o A ?. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. GOVERNOR Ms. Cyndi Bell DEM - Div. of Water Resources 4401 Reedy Cre:k Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Dear Ms. Bell: GARLAND B. GARRETT JR. SECRETARY 141.0 tiro NCO ?zT9 ?9> s SUBJECT: Federal Environmental Assessment for US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), near Waynesville, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. 15TP-23B(1), State Project No. 8.1942901, TIP No. R-2210A Attachd is a copy of the Environmental Assessment and the Natural Resources Technical Repct for the subject proposed highway improvement. It is anticipated this project will be processd with a "Finding of No Significant Impact"; however, should comments received on the-Environmental Assessment or at the public hearing demonstrate a need for preparing a Dr£t Environmental Impact Statement you will be contacted as part of our scoping process. Copies cf this Assessment are being submitted to the State Clearinghouse, areawide planning agencies, and the counties, towns, and cities involved. Permit review agencies should note it is anticipated Federal Permits will be required as discussed in thereport. Any comment you have concerning the Environmental Assessment should be forwarded to: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch N. C. Division of Highways P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 September 24, 1997 , 2 Your comments should be received by November 13, 1997. If no comments are received by that date we will assume you have none. If you desire a copy of the "Finding of No Significant Impact," please so indicate. Sincerely, H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch HFV/plr SIA/j , = r` STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION )AMEs B. HUNT Jr. GOVERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS r.0. BOX 25301. rv\LEIG11. N.C. 27611-5201 07 October 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Julie A. 1-Iunklns, P.E., Unit Head Project Planning Unit GARL-\ND B. GARREII' Jr, SEC1,ETARY Bruce O. Ellis, Environmental Biologist Environmental Unit 5 SUBJECT: Natural Resources Technical Report for Proposed Widening of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limit to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, TIP No. R-2210; State Project No. 3.1942901; Federal Aid No. STP-2313(1). ATTENTION: Michael L. Paylor, Project `Manager Project Planning Unit The attached Natural ReSOnrCCS Technical Report provides inventories and descriptions of natural resources within the project area, and estimations of impacts likely to occur to these resources as a result of project construction. Pertinent Inlormation Oil Waters of the United States and federally-protected species is also provided. I would appreciate the opportunity to review the dral't Environmental Assessment for this project. Please contact me if you have ally questions. or need this report copied onto disk format (ext. 305). cc: V. Charles Bruton. Ph.D., Environmental Unit Head Hal Bain, Environmental Supervisor Gordon Cashin, Permits Supervisor File: R-2210 Widening of US 23 Business From the Waynesville City Limit to US 19-23-74 Haywood County TIP No. R-2210 Federal Aid Project No. STP-2313(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 Natural Resources Technical Report R-2210 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT BRUCE 0. ELLIS, ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGIST 01 OCTOBER 1996 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... ........................1 1.1 Project Description .................................................................... ........................1 1.2 Purpose ...................................................................................... ........................1 1.3 Methodology ............................................................................. ........................1 1.4 Qualifications of Investigator .................................................... ........................2 1.5 Definitions ............................................................................... ........................2 2.0 Physical Resources ............................................................................... ........................2 2.1 Solis ......................................................................................... .........................) 2.2 Water Resources ....................................................................... ........................4 2.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics ............................ ........................4 2.2.2 Best Usage Classification .............................................. ........................5 2.2.3 Water Quality ................................................................ ........................5 2.2.4 Summary of Anticipated Impacts .................................. ........................7 3.0 Biotic Resources ................................................................................... ........................8 3.1 Terrestrial Communities ........................................................... ........................8 3.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed ................................................... ........................8 1.2 Mixed Hardwood Forest ............................................... ......................10 3.2 Aquatic Communities ............................................................... ......................1 1 3.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts .............................................. ......................1 1 4.0 Jurisdictional Topics ............................................................................. ......................13 4.1 Waters of the United States ....................................................... ......................13 4.1.1 Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters .......... ......................13 4.1.2 Permits .......................................................................... ......................13 4.2 Rare and Protected Species ........................................................ ......................14 4.2.1 Federally-Protected Species .......................................... ......................14 4.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species ... ....................1 19 5.0 References .................................................................................................................21 Figure 1. Project Location ................................................................................................2A Figure 2. Project Study Area ............................................................................................4A Table 1. Soils Within the Project Study Area ......................................................................3 Table 2. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities ........................................................12 Table 3. Federally-Protected Species for Haywood County ..............................................1 5 Table 4. Federal Species of Concern for Haywood County ...............................................20 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following Natural Resources Technical Report is submitted to assist in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed project. The project is located in Haywood County (Figure 1). 1.1 Project Description The proposed project calls for widening US 23 Business from the Waynesville city limits to US 19-23-74. The existing roadway consists of the following cross sections: a two lane, 5.5 m (18.0 ft) paved roadway with 0.6 in (2.0 ft) paved shoulders with 1.2-1.8 m (4.0-6.0 ft) total shoulder width (paved and unpaved), approximate length is 2.6km(1.6mi), a 12 m (40 ft) curb and gutter section near the Waynesville city limits, approximate length is 0.6 km (0.4 nil), a 16 m (52 ft) curb and gutter section in the area of the US 19-23-74 interchange, approximate length is 0.5 km (0.3 mi). The existing right-of-way (ROW) varies between 18.3 in and 36.5 m (60.0 ft and 120 ft). The proposed ROW will also be of varying widths throughout the project length and will be between 30.5 m and 36.5 m (100.0 ft and 120.0 ft). The proposed cross section is a five lane, 19.5 m (64 ft), curb and gutter roadway. Total project length is 3.7 km (2.3 mi). 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this technical report is to inventory, catalog and describe the various natural resources likely to be impacted by the proposed action. This report also attempts to identify and estimate the probable consequences of the anticipated impacts to these resources. Recommendations are made for measures which will minimize resource impacts. These descriptions and estimates are relevant only in the context of existing preliminary design concepts. If design parameters and criteria change, additional field investigations will need to be conducted. 1.3 Methodology Research was conducted prior to field investigations. Information sources used in this pre-field investigation of the study area include: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle maps (Clyde and Waynesville), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS, formerly the Soil Conservation Service) soil information, and NCDOT aerial photographs of project area (1:2500). Water resource information was obtained from publications of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR, 1993) and from the NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (Environmental Sensitivity Base Map of Haywood County, 1995). Information concerning the occurrence of federal and state protected species in the study area was gathered from the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) list of protected species and federal species of concern, and the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of rare species and unique habitats. General field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by NCDOT biologists Bruce 0. Ellis and Logan Williams on 28 May 1996. Plant communities and their associated wildlife were identified and recorded. Wildlife identification involved using one or more of the following observation techniques: active searching and capture, visual observations (binoculars), and identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat, tracks and burrows). Jurisdictional wetland determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria prescribed in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual" (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). 1.4 Qualifications of Principal Investigator Investigator: Bruce 0. Ellis, Environmental Biologist NCDOT. Education: BS Agri cuIture/Environmental Science, Rutgers University College of Agriculture and Environmental Science. Certification: Certified Lake Manager (North American Lake Management Society). Experience: Biologist, Allied Biological, Inc., March 1976-April 1994. Expertise: Aquatic resource management; wetland delineation; Section 7 field investigations; NEPA investigations. 1.5 Definitions Definitions for the terminology used in area descriptions contained in this report are as follows: Project Study Area denotes the area bounded by proposed construction limits; Project Vicinity describes an area extending 0.8 km (0.5 mi) on all sides of the project study area; and Project Region is equivalent to an area represented by a 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle map with the project occupying the central position. 2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES Soil and water resources, which occur in the study area, are discussed below. Soils and availability of water directly influence composition and distribution of flora and fauna in any biotic community. The project study area lies within the Mountain Physiographic Province. The topography within the project region is characterized by mountainous areas frequently dissected by streams.. The project area is situated in a small valley where Raccoon ppV _ J ?_sl.rlrne ( r? ?- ?-a ? wwrYll ?r u - fflb v (PARK s ? HY i ? v ? CrlDlr.e 1 A 1 0, 0, .27 he i v,u 19 67 s«: a.ood Ira.' aynesvi I II /' wosAro o f6 H- us hTAYWOOD COUNTY wly gunpa, 276 '. ? NAT. `? WAYNESVILLE QUAD .» ras to ?!tu. . ?,,.,• !AU R Il ltus< L4 "o zi 0 1 J ! 9.ewcn UN?1(,US, L°Y.°• Ins !u? 171L + •?J JJ .. ??.{ AnoYwk°.-0 END tt>? ?` ltz? PROJECT ». ?C 71 ttl?::? uti 6 o; 23 %1-1. =1 a Aim .., tt 4 ??::4 qty ..p 11L P 11f; v c BEGIN tw: r>. uss PROJECT o , pd- 4 a . tut n x s 1 " stf. eL.Y.Y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF °•I TRANSPORTATION sui = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1 v D PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL uu .Af _ » ;• ^tfsf ° j7 oao BRANCH u YNESV{CLE ,\'If 1iu ^, A u lstf US 23 BUSINESS POP- a,?e}. FROM WAYNESVH-LE CITY LIUM a n i TO NORTH OF US 19-21-74 Zj=CHANGE aI ' ffu HAYWOOD COUNTY tut TIP NO. R-2210 yi?i l<!Q 0 NILe rl, y ; ' r4'QQS FIG- 1 Creek has formed a moderately sized alluvial plain. Elevations within the project area vary slightly, and average approximately 790 m (2600 ft). Higher hilltops within the project vicinity average 884 m (2900 ft). 2.1 Soils Five soil map units occur within project boundaries: Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, Dillsboro-Urban land complex, Udorthents, Evard-Cowee-Urban land complex and Hayesville-Urban land complex. The Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex is associated with the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek, and is the only undisturbed soil unit within the project area. The other four units are soils that have been disturbed from excavation or by urban development. Table 1 lists study area soils in the order of relative dominance. Table 1. Soils' Within the Project Study Area Map Percent Drainage Hydric Unit Soil Sloe Class Classification CxA Cullowhee-Nikwasi somewhat poorly Complex 0-2 & poorly h dric3 DuC Dillsboro Urban Land Complex 2-15 well'- non h dric Ud Udorthents, loam not applicable variable non h dric ExD Evard-Cowee-Urban Land Complex 15-30 well2 non h dric HeC Hayesville-Urban La! Comlex 2-15 well non h dric A modern soil survey for Haywood County is currently not available. Soil information was provided by the NCRS of Haywood County. Drainage Class for the soil in its undisturbed state. Classified as Hydric due to the Nikwasi (listed as hydric) portion of this map unit, frequently flooded. The Cullowhee-Nikawasi complex is confined to the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek and occupies the central portion of the project area. However, most of the area occupied by this soil is used as pasture or in hay production. This map unit typically contains approximately 50 percent Cullowhee soils and 35 per cent Nikawasi soils. Cullowhee soils (sandy loam) are closer to the stream channel where they are associated with natural levees and are hi Jher on the landscape than the NikNvasi (loamy) soils. The Nikwasi soils are present in narrow flood plains, and this soil unit is listed as hydric. Flooding and wetness are the main use limitations for this soil complex. Udorthents consists of soils where the natural soil layering sequence has been destroyed by earth moving machines (MRCS). The disturbance is such that the original soil series is no longer identifiable. Soil characteristics, such as, drainage class, slope, 4 and productivity are no longer applicable. Udorthents are present in the northern portion of the study area, where significant soil disturbance associated with roadway construction, and commercial and urban development have occurred. The remaining map units are soil complexes that contain urban land. Urban land is described by the NCRS as soils that are "covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, railroad yards and airports. The natural soils were greatly altered by cutting, filling, grading , and shaping during the process of urbanization. The original landscape, topography, and commonly the drainage pattern have been changed." Due to the presence of impermeable surfaces, surface runoff is high and erosion is a hazard with unprotected soils. Generally, urban land comprises 20 to 35 per cent of these soil complexes. The higher densities of residential and urban development in proximity to the roadway suggest that urban land is present in a proportionally higher percentage in this area. Soil core samples taken throughout the project area revealed soils with a silty texture. The soils did not exhibit hydric characteristics, such as sulfidic odor, gleyed or low chroma colors, or mottling. Therefore, hydric soil indicators, as defined in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual", 1987, were not observed within the project study area. 2.2 Water Resources This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to be impacted by the project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of the resource, its relationship to major water systems, Best Usage Standards and water quality of the resources. Probable impacts to these water bodies are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts. 2.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics Waters in the project vicinity are part of the French Broad River Basin. The French Broad River Basin in North Carolina consists of three major river systems that include the French Broad, Pigeon and Nolichucky Rivers. The French Broad River occupies a central position within the basin. The three rivers flow in a northwesterly direction and eventually converge in Tennessee. Waters within the project area.are located in sub basin 04-03-05 of the French Broad River basin. Project area waters drain to the northwest and eventually empty into the Pigeon River. The Pigeon River is the western most river system of the French Broad River basin. The major water resource within the project area is Raccoon Creek. US 23 Business crosses over Raccoon Creek approximately 1.6 km (1.0 mi) north of the southern terminus of the project (Figure 2). Raccoon Creek then flows in a northwesterly direction until it converges with Richland Creek, 760 m (2500 ft) downstream of US 23 Business. Richland Creek continues in a northerly direction `? il''. 1 ; 1 / _ ) ?1? oSey/ov. plovi,nl (!lanl I, CLYDE QUAD ckiP o°41, 1 ) r )n ? :??11 /111 `?.' P ull,rigl,l Lenl ) r' ? I si: _ ° `• i.., ! / -- \\" ' r ?:J rrv/ G? ( I ?, _. _ 'silo ', ( •II? .O- (? 11' ?' , 1,?•, III ,, ?, . , ? \\\\ ° ?r•,1171511,. • 8 •x", IeGapj?,., ??, '• o° I ,, °; I• I •\,.+ l?lro "? -zn-,u4Iq Knmb ?\ I1\I1` / `\?. \ n :' 1` ` ?- l 1? / .. Jll Na ?? ?, I. !)` \l? i 5•/! n' ry'_/?c.? ? 1 \`•, ••? `•?• //?? /l? -? ? n'?,` +. ?\ ??A - _ =lll r .l ,?tj. _w I (. .F c /'ulro . ; e.j n. - li "Q ?• W 1 0- la:,;?,. I !/. L l• ?! \• ?i ?'T:: lY' bi y /? (? u) 1 ; ?ti;? > %,r1• -•) `,'.?„ I ` \;;s• -i - _ ? \l 1. „ ;,r - Il Tii -r?.v ??t,(^• „?/ ; •• ° / '/ ti .Ctln,l, •I,l`, .Ilai: j•J'6 .? vr\ p •• •, "/r?-?./ \'?? c',r oild, I e?i? /? ah' 1: ore \ 1 s7/1 ?p It1\rl ?, l,anr \\ cr r I,'III r ?l -?? l /r:. IN ?.\ v,• .'1• '/ ?.• 1 .% ? I I A /Ia•`?''?? .? , ll ' e a'll. i•1"" ?' ° ?,--- b P I ?,,,\ _ T I?,vl1,d'il \• ?Ch _? 'Se . • ? •, ?'?'`?I•^? " t. , //? Ilt / ? 111 r ,1 \ ? \ ??i/'.s"'?•?% _ ?U ?J ??.,...,. i__;? -? ??•. 1` ?,f".^ z.,'.'?^?.??? -"- .i:J%• '11 ;ill ,,r:< /• J'1 hni`' rI {/ r/ f a (?1411;!ra4 d? 4?1 rite. v f °?„ : V / 276 `_? ? t?._...•' ° ? '`\ r ?. <,I? N,V)I t .C.Id1?l ,? •, P -trl•t 4l.1 , \ ? riCetn-; ? i rr'Z? ,Rr r I I 1" '--J, .'fin m et ? "•e...?"t°' ?.."•%/? 'j'Swlmi Ing: ' 11 f4?765)i`," y??1.SG51j I r?'"'?I%+,( ??''' Z)'I ..I „ lt1r/ \? \ 1 n,., l\?I r t?l/1 /':c )I Junalusli' r ?_ ?l ?, q t, up41 r µ? I i' 1 41 vl 01 and ... t911aC?'114.I, •ti\ r- ???? ?iryt 1? H?\{(!'/?t`nYE'S?)'C,ItE4??7/1y?1 )I P1171';?'y/!? ilr•? l?? r, '?/ . ?° 'I !' ? ` r?9A1 j.?. \\\ , , ' N '1?jd c b 25jf 3 \• c1? /c ?= nh n i) END 11"j0.1f1 r :- v )/ T I , `t XI ,?S . ?? Ilp !( t) 1'n I. r ??,I,/? ?J O ! I`,. hI ( A I I /, 1 ?.^. + 4 1 1 t 5l 9 d? _ . i v e r' r f atA 7 7 a { I. i, of? ))r,v j f S r ,. ! r. uscoloHl h I l ? ?\ I Uft c> It nL? a). ? ! ?? d adli ??„??_ to ?'• ?,?. qr 1 1 (?r?,l l! ?1?!•?'ll It ? '\ v ? v, G rr?J\ ?1 it n GI ,y, 1 11 Ir ?I?( r r1'i 1 S%?J ?'? ?? l,\ '' v' • r " ,? I llowSlRPh,l (as.Il?? 511 1i 71. ,? Bh1,l•1 J5 I / 11 •O ?/ ?i (1' • ?s •I' {itgU ;?r.taPl^ Grove Pdul 1 / ' / G ?• -XIturch • --?( /r, ,_? •/ • Gnu urs ! J•`/ _ 'r.•,\. ., .III !'?+ ;."'Ir'.a •IA'a?r -- ?_ n '.-l (` ° %/ '\• ,.,, •,?.r - 'lye \ "?' P ?.• / rr? C j1 - __ ..__ ..__ ( 7 !r j' I- all Toll 1'1bU1tll'y LU JerC?j?///Knob S• b. 11110 0 0 0 0 1 1 Us C t ?'? ;t: i :il'?' YL Bnrllervdls I jl• ' ,.;1 l ;1 l s / S ... ' .J ! Gus ? , ? , ? -... - , ?CI!urc ILI sll? ° /.-x-11 l '+'?_?\_ . ? c •`, ip' 't l ? 'li lu ',C'as 1 r l ,) ? ? `7.X'r I+l S% "` ?? ::'?11 ?` \I'i` n.J ??' IZi1000UU)yl 1'C (IC (n Nillcresl;'e r . I ? I 4 ' 57 t= ( ! Lf?Gardenr I,ZIC111111141 L1Cl1C / "llle 5 n , \` •,, ?L23:x\ had; ``??. T ,.,I a?R.'•ti ?\.,i.-?1 'u _ 1 'n. '?. O1 W11?G 11 T? ,_ ?. 'r/?+i/ •l ?, ./ 1 :l 1'',\, ??I . /`_ i• ? ??... ?E .l? ?^.'.?. ?., .a\ l _u A f r"• (7al Mlle.Cure 08rn p li ?,i l?f,;;;? ? ^• I? _ '' ? i `_ ' ') •I ? \ .')•l / 11 .• \ ? - • 1 /. i_ 1216 ?a!;•:r;t SIB /. i ?dhYa I J? j? ` - / C ,% J f44 f ? ?_ ?' "`r ry ?"•? )??_ `5 1 Ynesvrr lheJ/, - -•,•?_. -/ _ ^•,?cq / ? ,10?,. , ? .?,?i' cC ,' I S ( ?.1 q i :,%I :`D',l,? ,I :'•:--z ??r ?Srr l?., /1_J,j ;l,'???t^"?•l s-d? i!? j °r?;';{:' ,',_ _ •, Io / / ,tll 1! L- 1 i4 i ii ..? - l?. il?..?il?• - I P.- 071 ,%'r c_ _ ) Ir % %' ! 1'KO.IL .? c. .) ,??'. ({. r? :•??' r/1 i., . 1 (?_ / CT SUDY AREA 11 SU' I` ?+ ?9' tee... IA ,r m` `'!I \? ,1 l Iihl (I ' :11 ` i%•, = _'? 11-2210 I 1 II ?'? <<4 ?' %'tl/ ?`•`?° ?'' .III , `='? 13LGIN lil I I l j• ?;? Maywood County J 2G4410, l?' • t1`J `' ?' (`, i• 1 tl'?., 1.''Y / 1 1 (t /? Sdr' hIU E Ct AI'( ' / j `/// w' 1e5UU1'CeS . ! i •(? r•t:)1l -'•? dtel' 1 i ?'^. • •(?//l ?. <I ' r 1 ,I 11 ? ' i ?.?I ?: f (??1 ' Y \??,,, ? II 1 , • I. ' I \ ,? ?? /,-- U RE .?? l:24000 -']G '/i(f /,.- ??, T' .I'` • f ?.'' ?(I i , ?.'. \ ;?'' I` (, ?.,o 2 ) I ?1 11 1 ! = '7J:1, janh? llt 1?? ? f %?, •tt?? ? '?' ' `'.1''N,,:; ') 1 1 'j?? ? 1 ? ??$'? ???, I ??I,P /) )/• j? 1 ) J ''' 'yr ?/ _ ,?? , / '' 4, ? ? ?' ay ? Jills •{7 (? Mil: /r ,1 ( ?., '/ 1. I ',Vr ' ? % .ii ?' (/ ? 1 ll' ,? jll?? '/ ( '1 I ?`? ?'?? ?too?%/ - ""l ?i/l,' ' .? Iv1 ?` 't 1-, \ `\y?( r-?1?•) er"r".. 'I ? li ??? l? `?\ .11\I' •? rl I' II' ''(? I `??? .?•'?/ .? , 111 K'E?F. N///?i ••1,( .; ( 'I' ; ' ! ?; ? ? I, A,1 ? i]i )'? I L I •1; r ?'w•,.... r) 1 --?1 .Fill ? ; ,! ! . `• '11 / I \ - I (• 1 ),% I h,'- I j / ?' l , 11?r \li-?_?' ? , ?' ?I ???' 9 I., / -- \ 1 / - rit /-i\ l ,?, ?,? '\,tt --'' ,ll??,.gr 1(I F I ? r ?\^ l .y ?'! l(?q .' ?'\.. \\'•?? fj1/?/f11fU L?hrl\\I ' r /'r \-- »_lh j r?.:r^;1 I I (i\ ?? ?,C, il` I a L?:`I?1 IIf?II?I II j?/f ? I?' •IrC?\)\' _'I r ?•? ? ?" \ •\ •?\\• l•` (.. ? I l., / • I , _. ,. 1 1 ?) ?J ?` .- ''?J ?O' P ('; I ? __? ! i \ \? ' ???/ . _I`I?• r r/ •'1 '°s • , -- r. ( 1 I znnn 1 1? I ' I' 70bu, ?j , f ItnrcrT_:r lJ? ?/ .>' • I- _.., o° , I ( '' ). t / - ,? ( (1 !I t •, r( ?? 1 (? , , I , ' .x,11. I „ 1 , , I I y.?,` ( ./ I i ( .I ? _ It i•, / ?i It' T-?r?1' 111/'1, ?l?j? )1:1(,1' I? .1•? r ' ?•?. ( III r! II"?; I ?f \'\ •{ yl I flfl?ll?l?. ??1?,? Ij. 1 `' I \' d ( l ?r 1vw?i. '' r '• ?t, /, !: / ? , ( I. '?I. /• ..1?. ?--'P'".T?? I I , Ili ` ?\`\,?l r 1?' r ?? 1 1a? )??(tl,\,?..1..,/:', /{Ui 'e I ?: 'I I? !?l?( /.%I' ' , 1.? j?/I {;•" ? ? ? ?:?? ?I .` \'? 'r, _\.• .• -?\e ??rZb/p , I?rl ? ?! .aor,o ' ' ( I r (" \ll) ? 1'' ' ?- ??i?r/ .f?'?/ l ` • ''{ r'?? -1---. \ ??, i I lli ( - \ 1 (.? ?` t';' ty' ,' ? • _ / Ll ?,? 1 1 , - - . ?rl (-1' .? h''?„ eO.m=•"? s1t, ,.,,1 T 1 ,/i ll i,l ?/ •(i.'?,.!! / •? '; ?rlJj / ,. ?r r'' 1 I ?/ `ti ''? .121fr 1 •1?" I'.;'I `', ;r 7 1''"I ??'• • , 'L;?,l I ,?. t 1 :? "! \ ' I'; -- ? - a 'I? I, _ :1 %? '.?,i1'! 1 /. 1..• }' - I :, ^?.. 1_( ;may / It I•d\1 rr 1''y 1' 1' It' I'?, `/ il?d?f? _ 1 I/,/.'./\1??1.?1`\??1,.•-?.?, (`?,` ??' / /_'// ; -. ? / wAYNESVILLG QUAD 5 until it empties into Lake Junaluska approximately 760 in (2500 ft) downstream of the confluence of Raccoon and Richland Creeks. Richland Creek reforms downstream of the Lake Junaluska dam andeventually joins with the Pigeon River 3.2 km (2.0 mi) further north. Raccoon Creek, at,US 23 Business, is 4.6 m (15.0 ft) wide and has an average depth of 0.3 m (1.0 ft). The substrate is composed of boulder, rubble, gravel and sand. Water clarity was excellent. No submersed aquatic vegetation was observed. One other stream crossing was observed during the site investigation. This is a small perennial unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The stream is located approximately 610 m (2000 ft) north of where US 23 Business crosses over Raccoon Creek. The stream is 0.8 m (2.5 ft) wide, 2.5 cm (1.0 in) in depth and has a substrate composed of sand and silt. Water flow was very low and no aquatic vegetation was observed. 2.2.2 Best Usage Classification Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The classification of Raccoon Creek and its unnamed tributary (index no. 5-16-14) is B. The B classification denotes freshwaters protected for primary recreation which includes swimming on a frequent or organized basis and all Class C uses. Class C uses include aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately, undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mile) of project study area. 2.2.3 Water Quality The Benthic Macro invertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by the DWQ ( formerly the Division of Environmental Management) and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water quality. The program assesses water quality by sampling for benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Many benthic macroinvertebrates have stages in their life cycle that can last from six months to a year, therefore, the adverse effects of a toxic spill will not be overcome until the next generation. Different taxa of macro invertebrates have different tolerances to pollution, thereby, long term changes in water quality conditions can be identified by population shifts from pollution sensitive to pollution tolerant organisms (and vice versa). Overall, the species present, the population diversity and the biomass arc reflections of long term water quality conditions. 6 No BMAN stations are situated on Raccoon Creek, however, a BMAN station is located within the project vicinity on Richland Creek at SR 1188. Since the BMAN station on Richland Creek is approximately 365 m (1200 ft) west of the project area, water quality results from this station will provide some-'fnsight to water quality conditions within the project vicinity. Richland Creek has, been sampled on four occasions since 1983. The resulting bioclassiflcations froth these sampling events are: 1983 Poor, 1985 and 1988 Fair, and 1992 Good-Fair (DWQ, 19.94). DWQ indicates that, historically, water quality concerns in Richland Creek have been significant, however, the positive changes in water quality conditions reflect improvements made by manufacturing/industrial facilities within the basin (DWQ, 1994). The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake and estuarine water quality monitoring stations strategically located for the collection of physical and chemical water quality data. The sample frequency and type of water quality data or parameters, that are collected are determined by the waterbody's freshwater or saltwater classification and corresponding water quality standards (DWQ, 1995). An AMS is located on Richland Creek at SR 1188. Water quality monitoring results from this station reveal that water quality criteria were exceeded at least once for the following parameters: fecal coliform, turbidity, copper, iron, mercury and zinc (DWQ, 1994). Lake Junaluska, is a 81 ha (200 ac) lake, located 1.4 km (0.9 mi) downstream of the project area. Lake Junaluska is monitored as part of the DWQ Lakes Assessment Program. DWQ (1994) reports that Lake Junaluska "has had problems with sedimentation and eutrophication." As a result of sedimentation, the lake has needed to be dredged about once every ten years since 1964 (DWQ, 1994). Sources of sedimentation, as reported by the DWQ, include highway construction, and residential and industrial growth within the Lake Junaluska watershed. Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is required to register for a permit. No point source dischargers are listed for Raccoon Creek or its unnamed tributary. However, Richland Creek contains several point source dischargers. Champion International Corporation, within the project vicinity, is permitted to discharge 1.5 million gallons per day of non-contact cooling water and condensate into Richland Creek. The outfall is located approximately 520 m (1700 ft) upstream of the confluence of Richland and Raccoon Creeks. Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater or snowmelt (DWQ). In urban areas, high concentrations of impervious surfaces greatly increases runoff rates and volumes. Stormwater collection systems then transport runoff waters quickly to receiving streams with little or no filtering by vegetated surfaces (DWQ). Contaminants originating from urban development include: lawn care products, such as, pesticides and fertilizers; automobile-related pollutants that include lubricants, abraded tire and brake linings; lawn and household wastes; and fecal coliform 7 bacteria from animals and failing septic systems. The high velocity and volumes of runoff can also cause increased erosion of stream channels through physical scouring of the stream banks and flood plain. As indicated by the DWQ (1994), the water quality within the project vicinity has been adversely affected by urban and industrial development. Recent water quality monitoring data suggests that water quality is improving, largely through improvements made by industry. Within the project vicinity, Richland Creek and Lake Junaluska are the water resources that have received the most impact. The Raccoon Creek watershed has received impacts from residential and commercial development, however, it has not been subject to industrial development and its associated water quality impacts. 2.2.4 Summary of Anticipated Impacts Construction of the proposed project will impact water- resources by one or more of the following processes: bridge and causeway widening, box culvert and/or pipe construction, and box culvert and pipe extension. Construction activities are likely to alter and/or interrupt stream flows and water levels at each aquatic site. This disruption of the stream reduces stream flow downstream of the project. Temporary diversions of water flow will raise the water level upstream from the project and lower the water level downstream of the project. Estimated linear impacts are derived using entire maximum proposed right-of- way widths. Therefore, it is estimated that 36.5 m (120 ft) of Raccoon Creek, and 36.5 m (120.0 ft) of the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek will be impacted by project construction (linear distance). Usually, project construction does not require the entire right-of-way: therefore, actual impacts may be considerably less. Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters: 1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion. 2. Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and vegetation removal. 3. Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/additions to surface and ground water flow from construction. 4. Changes in water temperature due to vegetation removal. 5. Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas. 6. Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction, toxic spills, and increased vehicular use. 8 Precautions should be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters should be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project. Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during the construction interval should also be strictly enforced. 3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial communities. This section describes those communities encountered in the study area, as well as, the relationships between fauna and flora within these communities. Composition and distribution of biotic communities throughout the project area are reflective of topography, hydrologic influences and past and present land uses in the study area. Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications and follow descriptions presented by Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible. Dominant flora and fauna observed, or likely to occur, in each community are described and discussed. Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided for each animal and plant species described. Plant taxonomy generally follows Radford, et al. (1968). Animal taxonomy follows Martof, et al. (1980), Menhenick (1991), Potter, et al. (1980), and Webster, et al. (1985). Subsequent references to the same organism will include the common name only. Fauna observed during the site visit are denoted with an asterisk (*). Published range distributions and habitat analysis are used in estimating fauna expected to be present within the project area. 3.1 Terrestrial Communities Two terrestrial communities are identified in the project study area: maintained/disturbed and mixed hardwood forest. Community boundaries within the study area are well defined without a significant transition zone between them due to development within the study area. Faunal species likely to occur within the study area will exploit both communities for shelter and foraging opportunities or as movement corridors. 3.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Several habitats, exhibiting similar characteristics are included in this description: road shoulders, residential and business landscapes, and agricultural fields. Road shoulders are irregularly maintained, receiving only periodic mowing and herbicide applications. Residential and business landscapes receive more Frequent mowing and general maintenance. The agricultural fields within the study area consist of pasture and forage crop fields, where the vegetation receives continuous disturbance through grazing and harvesting. 9 Road shoulders act as buffers between the roadway and surrounding communities by filtering stormwater run-off. Vegetation occurring here includes fescue (Festuca spp.), dandelion (Taraxacum of icinale), wood sorrel (Oxalis spp.), clover (Trifolium spp.), violets (Viola spp.), and buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Areas receiving less frequent maintenance are;pecupied by: broomsedge (1Indropogon virginicus), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), blackberry (Rebus allegheniensis), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), yarrow (Achillea millefolium), and ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). Vegetation associated with residential and business landscapes includes: flowering dogwood (Corms. lorida), azalea (Rhododendron spp.),), white pine (Pinus strobus), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), Norway spruce (Picea abies), northern red oak (Ouercus rubra), and various ornamental hybrids of hollies (Ilex spp.), arbor avitae (Thiya spp.), and juniper (Juniperus spp.). Lawn areas are dominated by fescue, clover (Trifolium spp.), plantains and crabgrass (Digitaria spp.). Agricultural fields, that are used for pasture and forage crop production are present within the flood plain of Raccoon Creek. This area is generally located in the central portion of the project area. Vegetation within the agricultural fields is dominated by fescue. Vegetative species that occur to a lesser extent include: clover, wild carrot (Daucus carota), buttercup (Ranunculus bulbosus), yarrow, goldenrod, ragweed and asters (Aster spp.). Jewel-weed (Impatiens capensis) is found along the banks of Raccoon Creek in the open fields. Small mammals that commonly occur within the maintained/disturbed community are the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), house mouse (Y11fus musculus), least shrew (Cr),ptotis parva) and eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus•). The house mouse is found in association with human activities where it finds food and shelter in barns, houses, restaurants and warehouses. It does equally as well in weedy and overgrown fields. Eastern moles excavate extensive tunnels and feed upon earthworms, insects and plant material. The Virginia oppossum* (Didelphis virginiana) and raccoon (Procyon lotor) are very adaptive mammals that will frequent this habitat for foraging opportunities. The eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) will utilize the open fields and disturbed habitats to forage on shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. Avian species likely to utilize this habitat for refuge and foraging opportunities include downy woodpecker* (Picoides pubescens), mourning dove* (7_enaida macroura), and American robin* (Turdus migratorius). Carolina chickadee (Partrs carolinensis), Carolina wren (Thryolhorus ludovicianus) and house sparrow (Passer clomesticus). These species will take advantage of feeders and nesting sites provided by human settlement. The American kestrel (Falco sparverius) will forage on small birds and mammals in this community. e 10 Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) and black racer (Coluber constrictor) frequent open and disturbed habitats. They will find suitable shelter and foraging opportunities in proximity with human activities. 3.1.2 Mixed Hardwood Forest Mixed hardwood forest is present in a variety of sizes and ages within the project area. All areas of this forest have had some degree of disturbance and include invasive ornamentals originating from nearby urban landscapes. , Residential and commercial activities have displaced the original forest with disturbed habitat. The larger parcels of this community type are located in the northeastern third of the project area. Smaller remnants of the mixed hardwood forest community are situated within the maintained/disturbed community. The canopy of the larger parcels is dominated by white oak (Ouercus alba), red oak (O. rubra), sugar maple (Ater saccharunt) and mockernut hickory (Carya tomenlosa). Other representatives of the canopy include black walnut (Juglands nigra), red maple (Ater rubrum) and black locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia). Shortleaf pine (Pines echinata) and eastern red cedar (Junilmrus virginiana) occur along the edges of this community. The shrub layer consists of flowering dogwood, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) and saplings of the canopy layer. Invasive species include privet (Ligustrum spp.) which was locally dense, and prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americana). Vines observed within this community formed a dense cover, especially on the outer edges of this community. Representative vine species include: bittersweet (C'elastrus scandens), grape (Vitis spp.), poison ivy, and Japanese honeysuckle. The herb layer was fairly sparse due to the dense shrub and vine layers. I-lerbaceolls vegetation includes: Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoidus),), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), and spotted wintergreen (C'himaphila maculata). The mixed hardwood forest offers habitat for a variety of fauna. The gray squirrel* (Sciurus carolinensis), Virginia opossum, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), raccoon*, eastern chipmunk (Tamias strialus) and woodchuck*(Marinota nronax) are inhabitants of this community. The presence of stratification provides habitat for avian species such as the, blue jay* (Cyanocitta cristata), red-bellied woodpecker (ivlelanerpes carolinus), northern flicker (C'olcrptes aurattrs) and downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens). Reptilian species include the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), five- lined skink (Eumeces fascialus),and black racer. Copperhead (Agkistrodon conlortrix) serves a predatory role by feeding on small vertebrates. 3.2 Aquatic Communities Aquatic communities impacted by the proposed project include Raccoon Creek and its tributary. Physical characteristics of the water body and condition of the water resource influence faunal composition of aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence aquatic communities. Fauna associated with the aquatic communities include various invertebrate and vertebrate species. Fish, 1968, classifies Raccoon Creek as a Robin-Warmouth stream, `'supporting some fishing for bluegill and other sunfishes." Prey fish including shiners (Notropis spp.), creek chub (Semotilus atron2aculatus), and longnose dace (Rhinichthys caturactae) provide foraging opportunities for redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auritus), bluegill (L. macrochirus) and warmouth (L. gulosus). Invertebrates that would be present include: crayfish (family: Cambaridae), and nymphal and larval stages of mayflies (Order: Ephemeroptera) and caddisflies (Order: Trichoptera). The bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frog (R. palustris), and northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon) are common permanent residents in this community. The tributary to Raccoon Creek will provide habitat for similar species of invertebrates that are found in Raccoon Creek. The substantially lower ?,vater flows in this tributary will preclude the presence of a significant fish population in this stream. However, juveniles of the Raccoon Creek fish population may find habitat and sanctuary in this tributary during high flow periods. 3.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic resources described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to impact biological functions. This section quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are considered here as well. Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each community present within the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these communities. Table 2 summarizes potential quantitative losses to these biotic communities, resulting from project construction. Estimated impacts are derived using the entire maximum proposed right of way width of 36.5 m (120.0 ft). Usually, project construction does not require the entire right of way, therefore, actual impacts may be considerably less. 12 Table 2. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities Community Impacts Maintained 7.0 (17.2) Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.7(l.8) Total 7.7 (19.0) Note: Values cited are in hectares (acres) Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering habitat for various wildlife. Widening US 23 Business and its associated improvements will reduce habitat for faunal species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers. However, since the project area is dominated by disturbed habitats, it is anticipated that impacts to fauna will be minimal. Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become road shoulders and early successional habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the roadway while attracting other wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for the species. Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. Stream channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation and erosion from construction- related work will effect water quality and biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts often associated with in-stream construction include increased channelization and scouring of the streambed. In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove streamside vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will produce siltation, which clogs the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-feeders), fish and amphibian species. Benthic organisms can also be covered by excessive amounts of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a stream The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction site alters the terrain. Alterations of the streambank enhances the likelihood of erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation carry soils, toxic compounds and other materials into aquatic communities at the construction site. These processes magnify turbidity and can cause the formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, thereby altering water flow and the growth oi'vegctation. Streamsidc alterations also lead to more direct sunlight penetration and to elevations of water temperatures which may impact many species. Revegetation stabilizes and holds the soil, thereby, mitigating these processes. 13 4.0 JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS This section provides dCSCnfptions, inventories and impact analysis pertinent to two important issues--Waters of ffie United States and rare and protected species. 4.1 Waters of the United Sties Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3 are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). 4.1.1 Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual". The three parameter approach is used where hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be present for an area to be considered a wetland. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area, however, jurisdictional surface waters are present. 4.1.2 Permits Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project study area. This permit authorizes construction provided the following conditions are met: (1) the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual crossing; (2) the fill placed in Water of the United States is limited to a filled area of no more than 0.1 hectares (1/3) acre); (3) no more than a total of 61 m (200 linear ft) of the fill for the roadway can occur in special aquatic sites, includin- wetlands; 14 (4) the crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and movement of aquatic organisms, and; (5) the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of a Water of the United States. A North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWOI,,;Section 401 Water Quality General Certification is required prior to the issuance of the section 404 nationwide #14. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or other land manipulations. Since the proposed project is located in a designated "Trout" county, the authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon the concurrence of the Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC). 4.2 Rare and Protected Species Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally- protected, be subject to review by the Fish and Wildlife (FWS). Other species may receive additional protection under separate state laws. 4.2.1 Federally-Protected Species Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of 23 August 1996, the FWS lists the following federally-protected species for Haywood County (Table 3). A brief description of each species' characteristics and habitat follows. 15 Table 3. Federally-Protected Species for Haywood Coun Scientific Name Common Name Status Felis concolor couguar eastern cougar E Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Carolina northern flying squirrel E Haliaeelus leucocephalus Bald eagle T Alasmidonta raveneliana Appalachian elktoe E Lsotria medeoloides small whorled pogonia E Gymnoderme lineare rock gnome lichen E "E" denotes Endangered, a taxon which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. "T" denotes Threatened, a taxon which is likely to become and endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Felis concolor cotigar (eastern cougar) Endangered Family: Felidae Date Listed: 06 June 1973 Cougars are tawny colored with the exception of the muzzle, the backs of the ears, and the tip of the tail, which are black. In North Carolina the cougar is thought to occur in only a few scattered areas, possibly including coastal swamps and the southern Appalachian mountains. The eastern cougar is found in large remote wilderness areas where there is an abundance of their primary food source, white-tailed deer. A cougar will usually occupy a range of 25 square miles and they are most active at night. BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT Suitable habitat in the form of large tracts of remote wilderness is not present in vicinity of the project area. The NC Natural I-Ieritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the eastern cougar within the project vicinity Therefore, project construction will have no affect on the eastern cougar. Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus (Carolina northern flying squirrel) Endangered Family: Sciurdiae Date Listed: 01 July 1955 The Carolina northern flying squirrel has a large well furred flap of skin along either side of its body. This furred flap of skin is connected at the wrist in the front and at the ankle in the rear. The skin flaps and its broad flattened tail allow the northern flying squirrel to glide from tree to tree. It is a solely nocturnal animal with large dark eyes. There are several isolated populations of the northern flying squirrel in the western part of North Carolina, along the Tennessee border. This squirrel is found above 1517 meters (5000 ft) in the vegetation transition zone between hardwood and 16 coniferous forests. Both forest types are used to search for food and the hardwood forest is used for nesting sites. BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT Suitable habitat in the form of hardwood and coniferous forests does not exist within the project area. Project elevation is 790 m (2600 ft), which is well below elevations where this species is normally found. Additionally, the NC Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Carolina northern flying squirrel within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will have no affect on the Carolina northern flying squirrel. Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Endangered Family: Accipitridae Date Listed: 11 April 1967 Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail. The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight bald eagles can be identified by their flat wing soar. Eagle nests are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Dish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion. BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees away from human disturbance does not exist within the project area. Bald eagles may find foraging opportunities in Lake Junaluska, however, project construction will not interrupt potential foraging activities in this water body. The NC Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the bald eagle in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle. 17 Alasmidonta raveneliana (Appalachian elktoe) Endangered Family: Unionidae Date Listed: 03 September, 1993 The Appalachian elktoe is a small mussel with a maximum length reaching up to 8.0 cm. Its shell is thin although the shell is not fragile, nor is the shell subovate (kidney-shaped). The periostracum (outer shell) of the adult Appalachian elktoe is dark brown in color, while juveniles have a yellowish-brown color. Three known populations of the Appalachian elktoe exist in North Carolina; the Nolichucky River (including its tributaries of the Cane River and the North Toe River), the Little Tennessee River and its tributaries, and the Tuckasegee River. The Appalachian elktoe has been observed in gravelly substrates often mixed with cobble and boulders, in cracks of bedrock and in relatively silt-free, coarse sandy substrates. BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT Extensive survey work in western North Carolina by the FWS and the WRC indicates that the Appalachian elktoe is restricted to three populations, in the Little Tennessee River in Macon and Swain Counties, in the Tuskasegee River in Swain County, and in the Nolichucky River basin in Yancey and Mitchell Counties. The Appalachian elktoe is not likely to be found outside of its current distribution area. The proposed project will not impact any water bodies within those areas. The NC Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Appalachian elktoe in the project vicinity. Therefore, it can be concluded that construction of this project will have no impact on the Appalachian elktoe mussel. Isotria medeoloides (small-whorled pogonia) Endangered Family: Orchidaceae Federally Listed: 10 September 1982 Flowers Present: mid May-mid June Small-whorled pogonia is a perennial orchid having long hairy roots and a hollow stem. Stems terminate in a whorl of five or six light green, elliptical leaves that are somewhat pointed. One or two light green flowers are produced at the end of the stem. Flowers of small-whorled pogonia have short sepals. The small-whorled pogonia grows in "second gro-mh deciduous" or deciduous- coniferous forests, with an open canopy, open shrub layer, and sparse herb layer. It prefers acidic soils. Flowering is inhibited in areas where there is relatively high shrub coverage or high sapling density. 18 BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT The remnant mixed hardwood forests within the project area contain very dense shrub and vine layers. Very little herbaceous vegetation was present in this forest community. Subsequently, no small-whorled pogonia habitat was observed during this investigation. Additionally, a review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and unique habitats revealed no listing of small-whorled pogonia within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the small-whorled pogonia. Cywmnoderma lineare (Rock gnome lichen) Endangered Family: Cladoniaceae Federally Listed: 28 December 1994 The rock gnome lichen is a squamulose lichen in the reindeer moss family. The lichen can be identified by its fruiting bodies which are born singly or in clusters, black in color, and are found at the tips of the squamules. The fruiting season of the rock gnome lichen occurs from July through September. The rock gnome lichen is a narrow endemic, restricted to areas of high humidity. These high humidity environments occur on high elevation (> 1220 m/ 4000 ft) mountaintops and cliff faces which are frequently bathed in fog or lower elevation (< 762 m/ 2500 ft) deep gorges in the Southern Appalachians. The rock gnome lichen primarily occurs on vertical rock faces where seepage water from forest soils above flows only at very wet times. The rock gnome lichen is almost always found growing with the moss Adreaea in these vertical intermittent seeps. The major threat of extinction to the rock gnome lichen relates directly to habitat alteration/loss of high elevation coniferous forests. These coniferous forests usually lie adjacent to the habitat occupied by the rock gnome lichen. The high elevation habitat occurs in the counties of Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Mitchell, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, and Yancey. The lower elevation habitat of the rock gnome lichen can be found in the counties of.iackson, Rutherford and Transylvania. BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT Suitable habitat in the form of high humidity areas, high elevation vertical rock faces and deep gorges does not exist within the project study area. Additionally, the NC Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the rock gnome lichen within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the rock gnome lichen. 19 4.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species There are 31 Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Haywood County. Federal Species of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the ESA and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Species of Concern are defined as those species which may or may not-be listed in the future. These species were formally candidate species, or species under consideration for listing for which there was insufficient information to support a listing of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Significantly Rare (SR) or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) list of rare plant and animal species are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. Table 3 lists Federal Species of Concern and State listed species, the species state status and the existence of suitable habitat for each species in the study area. This species list is provided for information purposes as the status of these species may be upgraded in the future. Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were any of these species observed. A review of the N.C. Natural Heritage Program data base of the rare species and unique habitats revealed no records of North Carolina rare and/or protected species in or near the project study area. 20 Table 3. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species for Havwood County Scientific Name Common Name Status Habitat Clemmys muhlenbergi Bog turtle T NO Contopets borealis Olive-sided My catcher SC NO Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Hellbender SC NO Dendroica cerulea Cerulean warbler SR NO A,ficrolits chrotorrhintts carolinensis Southern rock vole SC NO Neotomahoridana haematoreia Southern Applachian woodrat SC NO Neotoma magister Alleghany woodrat SC NO Sorex palustris punctulatus Southern water shrew SC NO Sylvilagus obscures Applachian cottontail SR NO Thryomanes beivickii altus Applachian Bewick's wren E NO Eulochus marialiciae Mary Alice's Small-headed fly SR YES Phyciodes batesii Tawny cresent butterfly SR NO Speyeria Jana Diana fritillary butterfly SR NO Abies fraseri Fraser fir C NO Buckleya disticophylla Piratebush E NO Cardamine clematitis Mountain bittercress C NO Carex manhartii Manhart's sedge C NO Delphinium exaltatum Tall larkspur E-SC NO Euphorbia purpurea Glade spurge C NO Glyceria ntthigena Smokey Mountain manna grass T NO Juglands cinerea Butternut W5, NO Lysimachia firaseri Fraser's loosestrife E YES Rugelia nudicaulis Rugel's ragwort i' NO Saxifi•aga caroliniana Carolina saxifrage E NO Silene ovate Mountain catchfly C NO Trillium pusillum var. I Alabama least trillium E NO Leplohymenium sharpii Mount LeConte moss C NO Plagiochila caduciloba A liverwort E NO Plagiochila sharpii A liverwort C NO Plagiochila sullivanatii var. suUivanlii A liverwort C NO Snenolobonsis nearsonii A liverwort C NO Watch List 21 5.0 REFERENCES American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds (6th ed.). Lawrence, Kansas, Allen Press, Inc. Amoroso, Jame L., and A. S. Weakley, 1995. "Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina". North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. Cowardin, Lewis M., et al, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Lee, D.S., J.B. Funderburg, Jr. and M.K. Clark. 1982. A Distributional Survey of North Carolina Mammals. Raleigh, North Carolina Museum of Natural History. LeGrand, Jr., H.E., and S. P. Hall, 1995. "Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina". North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey and J.R. Harrison 111. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and V it inia. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press. Menhenick, E.F. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. N.C. WRC., Raleigh. NCDEHNR-DENT. 1988. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) Water Quality Review 1983-1986. NCDEHNR-DEM. 1991. Biological Assessment of Water Quality in North Carolina Streams: Benthic Macro invertebrate Data Base and Long Term Changes in Water Quality, 1983- 1990. NCDEHNR-DEM. 1993. "Classifications and Water Quality Standards for North Carolina River Basins." Raleigh, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. NCDEHNR-DEM. 1994. "Basinwide Assessment Report Support Document, Drench Broad River Basin". Raleigh. Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press. JII Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of The Natural Communities of North Carolina. Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Correspondence: soil information for the project area, Haywood County, Natural Resource Conservation Service. North Carolina Agriculture Experiment Station. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1979. Classifications of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Webster, W.D., J.P. Parnell and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas. Virginia and Maryland. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press. 14 US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-2313(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 A ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and N. C. Department of Transportation Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (C) Date H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT Date Nicho . Graf, P. E. Fog Division Administrator, FHWA US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Avenue) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-2313(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 A i ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT July, 1997 Planning and Environmental Branch By: i '7'25.94 Date Date Date Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager Planning and Environmental Branch 01 •%$111111If,,,, CAR •? SE Al s 18496 ' Ju e . Hunkins, 11. E. Pr 'ect Planning Unit Head Administrative Action Environmental Assessment Prepared by the Planning and Environmental Branch of the North Carolina Department of Transportation in Consultation with the Federal Highway Administration + 1. Tyne or f Action This is a Federal Highway Administration Action, Environmental Assessment. 2. Additional Informatio The following persons can be contacted for additional information concerning proposal and statement: Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P. E. Division Administrator Federal Highway Administrator 310 New Bern Avenue Suite 410 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Telephone 919/856-4346 Mr. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways Transportation Building Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Telephone 919/733-3141 3. Description of Action The Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation propose to widen and improve US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the 6 Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). This project is approximately 3.5 kilometers (2.2 miles) long. A location map is • shown as Figure 1. The existing two-lane shoulder facility is proposed to be widened to a five-lane, 20.4-meter (68-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter roadway from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial 11 ping is proposed for the existing four-lane section of US 23 1(0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve surfacing improvements, where warranted, are proposed for this ay. proposed project has an estimated cost in the 1998-2004 Transportation ,nt Program (TIP) of $ 5,650,000, including $ 2,200,000 for right of way and )00 for construction costs. The cost of the recommended improvements included environmental assessment is $ 10,541,000, which consists of $ 3,941,000 for right ry and $ 6,600,000 for construction. This project proposes to widen the existing two-lane roadway to a multi-lane facility, and realign and resurface the existing four-lane roadway, where warranted. The two studied alternates, which are evaluated in detail in this document, are described below and are shown in Figure 2. Alternate 1 - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23 Business from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), and resurfacing, where warranted, from approximately 0.4 (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801. Alternate 2 (Recommended) - A combination of east, west, and symmetrical widening of US 23 Business from Marshall Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive), and realignment and resurfacing, where warranted, from approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801. In addition to the alternates described above, consideration was given to maintaining the existing three-lane, 12-meter (40-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street. The section of US 23 Business from East Street to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 would be widened to a three-lane, 12-meter (40-foot) curb and gutter section. From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, US 23 Business would be resurfaced as needed. However, because of the high traffic volumes projected along US 23 Business in the vicinity of the southern project terminal, it was determined that widening the facility to five lanes along the entire project corridor was necessary to promote safer traffic flow and provide an acceptable level of service. iii It is anticipated that Department of the Army Nationwide Permits # 14 (minor road crossings and/or #26 (above headwaters) will be applicable. A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification will be required by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for activities resulting in a discharge into any of the streams involved with this project. The project lies within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watershed. Planning and construction of the widening project will need to comply with the TVA's "Stream Modification Policy" regarding channelization, modification, and renovation of waters subject to TVA actions. Coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will continue throughout project development since the project is located in a designated "trout" county. 6. Due to the severe vertical curvature along this segment of US 23 Business, a design speed exception will be necessary from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road). The proposed design speed of this segment will be 60 km/h (35 mph). 7. Summary of Beneticial a_nd AclverGe hnviron_rnentai impacts The proposed improvements will allow more efficient and safer vehicular operation and reduced travel time for commuters near Waynesville, resulting in road user cost savings. It is anticipated that the project will alleviate present and future anticipated traffic congestion along existing US 23 Business. It is anticipated this project will increase traffic mobility and enhance safety. The proposed improvements are warranted to accommodate projected traffic growth and to increase motorists' safety. Approximately 12.3 hectares (30.3 acres) of right of way will be required. No prime farmland of state and locally important farmland will be acquired. Although no jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted by this project, jurisdictional surface waters will be impacted by this project. Implementation of the proposed project will necessitate approximately 40 m (135 feet) of stream modifications to Raccoon Creek. It is anticipated that four (4) residences and seven (7) businesses, none of which are minority or low income displacees, will be relocated as a result of the proposed improvements. Additionally, 26 residential receptors are anticipated to approach or exceed the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours as a result of highway traffic noise in the project area. However, no receptor is expected to experience a substantial increase (considered to be IV 10 dBA, since existing noise levels are greater than 50 dBA). This project is also anticipated to impact five (5) geodetic survey markers. 8. One-and-a-half meter (5-foot) sidewalks will be provided on the west side of US 23 Business from East Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road). Following confirmation that the Town of Waynesville will commit to sharing the cost of the pedestrian facilities, a municipal agreement regarding cost participation must then be established between the Town of Waynesville and the NCDOT. Throughout the entire project, outside travel lanes of 4.2 meters (14 feet) in width will be provided to accommodate bicycle traffic. Since the project will be constructed as a curb and gutter facility, bicycle-safe grates will be provided throughout the project. This project is not expected to impact jurisdictional wetlands; however, impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." Since the proposed project is located in a designated "trout" county, the authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon concurrence by the NCWRC on the proposed project. Stream impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project. These impacts are associated with the construction and extension of culverts and/or pipes. The details of stream involvement and modification will be detailed in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification, and compensatory mitigation with regard to stream mitigation is left to the discretion of DWQ. The NCDOT will coordinate with the DWQ to fulfill any necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. The NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters should be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project. Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during construction will also be strictly enforced. If encroachment or fill placement in the 100-year floodway is necessary, the NCDOT will insure that no increase in the base flood discharge elevations will occur. The NCDOT will coordinate with USCOE and the NCWRC during final hydraulic design to insure that any environmental concerns are appropriately addressed, and with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations. v To minimize surface water impacts.the proposed project will include: Consideration of decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of right-of-way widths and fill slopes. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. To avoid adverse impacts to the Miller-Francis House (eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places), FHWA and NCDOT commit to the following: Installation and maintenance of protective fencing along the property (right of way) easement line during construction. If roots are encountered during construction, the contractor is required to cleanly cut them and exercise good tree protection practices. 9. Basis for the Environmental Assessment On the basis of planning and environmental studies, it is anticipated this project will not have a significant detrimental effect on the quality of the natural or human environment. The proposed project will cause no significant changes in planned land use and is not controversial in nature. The project has been reviewed by federal, state, and local agencies, and no objections have been raised. No major objections were voiced at the Citizens Informational Workshop held on May 8, 1996. For these reasons, it is concluded that an Environmental Assessment is applicable to the project. TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 SUMMARY I NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. General Description B. Purpose of the Project C. Independent Utility and Logical Termini D. Project Status E. Project Terminals F. Existing Roadwiy Inventory for Intersecting Roads 1. Length of Roadway Section Studied 2. Existing Cross Section 3. Route Classification 4. Right of Way 5. Access Control 6. Vertical and Horizontal Alignment 7. Sight Distance 8. Speed Limits 9. Intersecting Roads and Type of Control 10. Interchanges 11. Bridges and/or Culverts 12. Railroads 13. Sidewalks/Greenways 14. Bicycle Accommodations 15. Utilities 16. School Bus Data 17. Degree of Roadside Development 18. Airports G. Traffic Volumes H. Existing Facility Capacity Analysis 1. Mainline Analysis 2. Intersection Analysis PAGE 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 1. Thoroughfare Plan 9 J. Accident Investigation 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE v II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 10 A. Recommended Alternate 10 B. Project Length 10 C. Cross Section Description 10 D. Right of Way 10 E. Access Control 10 F. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control 10 G. Level of Service and Area Road Network 11 H. Bridges and/or Culverts 13 1. Design Speed 14 J. Sidewalks 14 K. Bicycle Accommodations 14 L. Greenways 15 M. Landscaping 15 N. Noise Barriers 15 0. Multiple Use of Space 15 P. Changes in the State Highway System 15 Q. Railroads 15 R. Degree of Utility Conflicts 15 S. Anticipated Design Exceptions 16 T. Cost Estimates 16 U. Stage Construction 16 V. Special Permits Required 16 W. Geodetic Survey Markers 16 X. Other Proposed Improvements in the Project Area 17 Y. Effect of the Project on Existing Roads 17 Z. Benefits to Community, State, and Region 17 III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 18 A. Recommended Alternates 18 B. "Do-nothing" Alternate 18 C. Alternate Modes of Transportation 18 + D. Postponement of Proposed Action 18 E. Alignment Alternates 18 F. Typical Section Alternates 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) G PAGE IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 20 A. Social Effects 20 1. Land Use 20 a. Existing Land Use 20 b. Existing Zoning 20 C. Proposed Land Use 20 d. Project Consistency With Local Plans 21 2. Neighborhood Characteristics 21 3. Relocatees 21 4. Public Facilities 22 5. Social Impacts 22 6. Environmental Justice 22 7. Cultural Resources 23 a. Architectural/Historic Resources 23 b. Archaeological Resources 24 B. Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Properties 24 1. Section 4(f) Resources 24 2. Section 6(f) Resources 24 C. Economic Factors 25 D. Environmental Effects 25 1. Biological Resources 25 a. Plant and Terrestrial Wildlife Communities 25 b. Aquatic Communities 28 C. Potential Impacts to Biotic Resources 28 d. Protected Species 30 1. Federally Protected Species 30 2. Federal Species of Concern and 35 State-Listed Species TABLE OF r-ONTENTS (continued) PAGE V. 2. Water Resources 38 3. Jurisdictional Wetlands and Surface Waters 42 a. Permit Requirements 42 b. Wetland Mitigation 43 1. -Avoidance 43 2. Minimization 44 3. Compensatory Mitigation 44 4. Soils 45 5. Flood Hazard Evaluation 46 6. Noise Analysis 47 a. Characteristics of Noise 47 b. Noise Abatement Criteria 48 C. Ambient Noise Levels 49 d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels 49 e. Traffic Noise Levels and Noise Contours 50 f. Highway Noise Abatement 52 g. "Do-Nothing Alternative 53 h. Construction Noise 54 i. Summary 54 7. Air Quality Analysis 54 8. Hazardous Wastes/Geological Impacts 57 9. Farmland 57 10. Construction Impacts 58 COORDINATION AND COMMENTS 60 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) I TABLES PAGE Table 1 - Existing Cross Section Along US 23 Business 3 Table 2 - Right of Way Widths Along US 23 Business 4 Table 3 - Current and Proposed Traffic Projections 6 Table 4A - Mainline Capacity Analysis 7 Table 4B - Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8 Table 4C - Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9 Table 5 - Accident Rates 9 Table 6 - Proposed Intersection Treatment 11 Table 7A - Mainline Capacity Analysis (Proposed Improvements) 12 Table 7B - Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Level of Service (Proposed Improvements) 12 Table 7C - Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Level of Service (Proposed Improvements) 13 Table 8 - Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities 29 Table 9 - Federally Protected Species for Haywood County 31 Table 10 - Federal Species of Concern and State-Listed Species for Haywood County 37 Table 11 - Soils Within the Project Study Area 45 Table 12 - One Hour CO Concentrations 56 MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Proposed Improvements (Aerial) Figure 2A - Location of Existing and Proposed Greenway Trail Figure 3 - Current and Projected Traffic Volumes Figure 4 - Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan Map Figure 5 - Proposed Typical Section Figure 6 - 100-Year Floodplain Map Figure 7 - USGS Map Identifying Raccoon Creek and Tributaries I I -H 1nopueH dogs3ltoM uotlt,uuojul suoztli0 put, mtmp d ssaid dogs)ItoM uotlt,uuojul suoztlt0 I-Q su-MJOoad uotIt,oolall SXL'Mg21H Jo uotstntQ 3o uotssnostQ put, uodna uommola'l I-D salgt,l stsXlt,ud Xitlt,no mV/solqui astoN uotJon IMOD Put' MOM og3t,tZ XLmggtH 1-9 ,CpnIS lot,dutl JUIM tuoitnug It,31201039 I-d pant300-d sIuautWOD put, aout,puodsa.uoD HOW a XIQNgddH Q XIQN3ddv 0 XIQN3ddv 8 XIQNaddv d XIQNgddd S3DIQNgddv • (panutluoo) S LN3.LN00 30 ar.IgV L put, `.aputtt ant, t,an ag1 ut sluautanoadutt uotlulaodsut,al jt,uotltppt, ou3t uana amlipuadxa olquoseat t, aq put, alqusn aq `•a•t `aouuogtuSts luapuadaput ao '14Ilt1n luapuadaput uu anRIl `.odoos puoaq u uo saallutu Iuluautttoatnua ssaappt, of tllSual lu3toT3ns 3o aq pun tutuual IuotSol u loauuoD `•llugs...palunluna uotlot, agl `palt,nlt,na are Xagl aaojoq sluautanoadtut uotlil.todsueil o1 sluauiltututoo ptont, 01 put, santlt,uaallu jo uotlt,nluna InjSutut,atu amsua of aapao u..... `(1)I I P ILL IddD £Z 01 Suip.toood 'g£Z Sfl sr palou3p aq Iltm ssautsng £Z SfI puu `laaalS IlugsauW sic of pauaja.z aq Iltm `Iuutuual loafoad tuaglnos 3141 `(a^uQ Put,ipooAkAaaalS iit,gsat,yq) slttttl-l ?4!D alltnsau,CuM a141 luaumoop sigl jo asodand oql ao j -alnoi glnos-glaou u st ssautsng £Z Sfl -uotlulaodsuual fumgOiq jo luatuanoadtut luaauaS aql W04 pantaap aq Iltm sigauaq otutouooa-otoos loompul -attttl 13AUal p3onpaa puu `uotlt,aado alotgan aa3t,s put, luatog3a aaout aq ll!A% uotSaa puu `aluls `Xliuntuwoo aql o1 slgauaq 3141 `sluauzanoadtttt pasodoad agl jo llns3a t, sd -XiojLs ?slstaolow amsut of puu glmoaS og3ual paloafoad alupoututoom 01 palut,aaum ant, sluautanoadutt posodoad aqZ -,Cla3us aouuqua puu Xltltgotu 3!jjun maaout lltm loafoad stgl paludtoiluu st 11 -ssautsng £Z Sfl Sutlstxa Suolu uoilsaSuoo o33t,al paludtotluu aminj puu luasaad alutnallu of st loafoad sttll jo 3sodmd 3q L In roidogf3o 3sodlnd 8 -Z amST J ut unnogs aau sluautanoadum pasodoad aq L -I amSi3 ut umogs st uotluo01 loofotd IunuaS ;)q L •(dI L) ureaSoad luautanoadutl uonwodsut,al, JLOCDM b00Z-8661 aql ut palstl asogl uzo.g Ajjq tls Gaon laodaa stgl ut palt,ls tutuual loofoad aq,L -fMAXpt,oa Jo uotloas s1141 aoj pasodoad on `palut,aaum aaagnn `sluatuanoadtut Sutn3ansaa put, luautugtluaa an.mo • aoutut `aanannoq `.1081 'HS 01 L9ZI dS.Io glaou (altut SZ'0) mri b'0 woo ssautsng £Z Sfl aoj posodoad st Sutuaptm oN •(anu(I ?lat,d IuulsnpuI) L9ZI 2IS3o tllaou (altar 9Z'0) (ul) s131aut01tjb'0 o1(antaQ Put,ipooM/laaalS IlugsauW) slttut'IAI!D aiitnsauXuM 1st,a141.tou aql tuoa3 Xltltou3 a311nS puu qmo aut,l-ang t, 01(puo21 alltnagsd) ssautsng £Z Sfl Sutlstxa uaptm of s3sodoad (,Lp(IDN) uotlulaodsuua,L jo luatulaudaQ t,utloauo gl.toN 314,E n `d •aunl Umi-l3al antsnioxa uu snid `tum IgSu pomgs u ql!m aunt gSno ql u sug 1081 2IS `uotioattp punoglsom agl ul 'aut.i umi-lgBij antsnioxa uu snid uml i3ai pomgs u ql!m aunt gBnonU anuq sduiua ssw& ft-£Z-61 Sfl agl `uopomp punoglsna agl ul 'aunt uml-iggta anisnioxa uu snid `sauui g2not p punoggiaou om4 sug g£Z Sfl `uotluooi stgi id ' 1081 2IS puu g£Z Sf13o uoilaasiolut agi si laafold stgi3o Inuiuual uiagalou agjL •suotloaatp punoglsam pun punoglsea aql ut ot3Jn.ti ,CUM OM4 `auui-OM4 anuq gloq iaaaiS iingsmW pun anuQ PuuiPooM •suotloa.ttp gloq ui aunl umi-Ual antsnioxa uu pun `aunt punogglnos auo `auni punoggalou auo snq g£Z Sfl `uotiuool stgi id 'ltuit'I ,CitD aiitnsaUA2Ak isuagltou agl lu laailS Iiugsjuw Tim H£Z SflJO uotlaasialut aqi st loofoid sigl jo iuutuuai uioglnos otU !U!UU3,L Parmd 3 •uotlotulsuoo aoi 000`009`9 $ PUL, ,Gunn jo ig8u X03 000` i b6` £ $ 3o slstsuoo gotgnn 1000'1 tbS`01 $ st luauissassu Iuluaunioltnua sigl M papnloui sluauianoiduzi popuauxiuoow agi3o isoo aqj -slsoo uotioniisuoo .io3 000`09tb`£ $ pun Aunn jo lggu .toj 000`00Z`Z $ 8uipnimi `000`OS9`S $ jo Buipunj Imoi n sopnlout dI.L aq.L 'Aiantlaadsoi `OOOZ Puu 6661 MOM Inosi3 ut ut8aq of palnpagos om uoilotulsuoo put, uotitsmbou funn-lo-igOt?l •,Citltouj aunt-tilnui u of ,Cunnpuoi Ouilsixa agi3o Outuaptnn alp JOJ slluo (dIL) ureaSo.id iuatuanoiduil uoilultodsuuzZ jLO(IDN £OOZ-L661 OU Sums looma CI (J)111* ILL -dJD £Z ut gpo3 ias nuolt.io oql spoor loofotd stgl pouiuualap anuq LOUDM puu WAHA •luaumoop luluauiuoitnua alu ndas u ui paiunluna A.Iin3 oq limn siuauianotduit Auugoiaiui aql of paiula.i sionduit Iuiuauiuoitnua agZ •(tOOZ iaiju) .ma,C isod ut8aq of painpagos Xlluouno st S 01ZZ-2I3o uoiloniisuoo puu uotitsinbon Xunn 3o-lg$t2l '(S OiZZ'2I) a8uugotalut g£Z Sfl /bL-£Z-61 Sfl aql of siuauianoiduit joj poluu2isop ioafojd dI.L agl gltnn aigtluduioo oq of pou2isop si pun ioafoid 2utuotiounj u sn auoln puuls uuo loafotd siigjL 'Altltln iuoptxadaput puu iuiuual luoi2ol solu.tisuouiap ioafoid pasodoid aql `pmSaa stgl ul •sloofoid dI.L p3uiuiui2otd Ouiutofpn ioj saiuutallu oldillnui jo luauissassu puu luauidolanap 2ql apnloa.id lou op tuiuuoi asotp `sioafold dI.L pounuuz$oad Oututofpn gltnn palnutpmoo uaaq anuq tutuuai s,ioafotd posodotd otpjo suoiluaol aqZ u0imsi3lu! (puo21.taut-I Auaf) 1081 2IS/g£Z Sfl oql si snutuuai ioafo.td tuagltou s'loafoid aqL 'uotioasialui iaauS IingsjuWjgEZ SCI aql iu `ituirl AltD aiitnsaUXUAk u.taisuagitou aqi iu palmol st snuiuual uiaglnos s joafold pasodotd aql « sluauzano idwt uoilui todsun tl alquaasaioj Clquuosuw i3gio lo3 santinuiallu Jo uotiu.taptsuoo ioillsw lolq z F. Fang Roadway Inventory for Intersecting Roads 1. Length of Roadway Section Studied The approximate length of the studied section of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 is approximately 3.5 kilometers (km) (2.2 miles). 2. Existing Cross Section 10 The existing cross section along US 23B is outlined below in Table 1. TABLE 1 EXISTING CROSS SECTION ALONG US 23 BUSINESS SEGMENT CROSS SECTION Marshall Street to East Street Three-lane (with continuous center turn lane), 12-meter (40-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section East Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of Two-lane, 6.6-meter (22-foot) roadway SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) with 1.2- to 1.8-meter (4- to 6-foot) grassed shoulders From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 Four-lane, 15.6-meter (52-foot) (face to to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) face of curbs) curb and gutter section 3. Route Classification US 23B is classified as a rural major collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System. Throughout the study corridor, US 23B is designated a major thoroughfare on the Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan. 4. Right of Way Approximate right-of-way widths for segments of US 23B are shown in Table 2, below. 4 TABLE 2 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS ALONG US 23 BUSINESS SEGMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) 18 meters (60 feet) From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Drive) 30 meters (100 feet) There is no control of access along existing US 23B in the proposed project corridor. 6. Vertical and Horizontal Alignment Although the terrain is rolling throughout the project, the vertical alignment along US 23B is good, with the exception of the vicinity of the southern project terminal where the vertical alignment is poor. The horizontal alignment, however, is poor along the proposed route as several undesirable curves exist along the route. 7. Wight Distance Although several undesirable curves exist along existing US 2313, the overall sight distance along the alignment is acceptable based on current NCDOT design standards. 8. Sneed Limits The speed limit along US 23B varies from 56 to 72 kilometers per hour (km/h) (35 to 45 miles per hour [mph]). 9. Intersecting Roads and Type of Control The US 23B/Marshall Street and US 23B/US-19-23-74 (ramps)/SR 1801 intersections are currently signalized; all other roadways intersect with US 23B at grade and have stop sign control. 10. Interchanges The US 19-23-74/US 23B interchange is located adjacent to the northern project terminal. s 11. Bridges and/or Culvert r r The existing structure where US 23B crosses Raccoon Creek is the only major stream crossing associated with this project. It is a 4.2-meter x 2.7-meter (14-foot x 9-foot) bottomless single barrel reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). This culvert is approximately 11.4 meters (38 feet) in length along its centerline and is located approximately 0.4 km (0.26 miles) north of SR 1802 (Francis Farm Road) (see Figures 1, 2, and 7). 12. Railroads There are no railroad crossings on US 2313; however, the Southern Railway closely parallels US 23B from the vicinity of SR 1267 to the vicinity of SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) (see Figure 2). In this area, the railway right of way is 15 meters (50 feet); at its closest point to US 2313, the centerline of the Southern Railway is approximately 18.9 meters (63 feet) from the edge of pavement of the existing roadway. 13. A 1.2-meter (4-foot) concrete sidewalk exists on both sides of US 23B from Marshall Street northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street. Within the proposed study corridor, the Richland Creek Greenway Trail parallels the proposed project to the west of US 23B and currently exists in two segments. The first segment of this greenway trail originates on Marshall Road in the vicinity of the Waynesville/Marshall Road Park and proceeds northeastward approximately 0.85 km (0.53 mile) to the vicinity of the WaynesvilleNance Street Park. The second segment exists as a fitness trail and is located in the vicinity of the Champion Paper Company, located approximately 270 meters (900 feet) west of the proposed project, along SR 1184 (Howell Mill Road) (see Figure 2A for a graphic representation). The 1.1 km (0.69 mile) of existing sidewalks located along Marshall Road and Main Street, west of the proposed project, and the existing Richland Creek Greenway Trail, are two elements of the current pedestrian facility commitment endorsed by the Town of Waynesville, Haywood County, the Lake Junaluska Assembly, and the Richland Creek Action Committee. In the opinion of these officials, construction of pedestrian facilities along the subject project would comprise the third and final element of the pedestrian facility plan for the Town of Waynesville and this area of Haywood County (see Appendix A, pages A-25 and A-26, and Figure 2A for a graphic representation of this description). 6 14. Bicycle Accommodations US 23B is not a designated bicycle route, .nor are any special accommodations for bicycles currently provided along US 23B. 15. Utilities Several utilities are located along this project, including power lines, sewer systems, telephone lines and underground water lines. According to a preliminary utility investigation, this project will have high utility involvement. 16. School Bus Data Currently, there are 12 buses (24 trips) per day along US 23B from Marshall Street to the vicinity of SR 1801. 17. Degree of Roadside Development Development along US 23B is light to moderate, consisting of scattered residences and businesses. From the southern project terminal to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road), residences and businesses are located close to the existing right-of-way boundary. 18. Airports No airports exist within 3.2 km (2 miles) of the proposed project. G. Traffic Volumes Current and projected average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for US 23B are shown below in Table 3. TRAFFIC VOLUMES TABLE 3 (IN VEHICLES PER DAY [VPD]) FACILITY 1997 1997 2020 2020 (LOW) (HIGH) (LOW) (HIGH) US 23B 13,200 vpd 17,500 vpd 23,000 vpd 29,400 vpd The projected volumes generally include 1% truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and 2% dual-tired (DT) vehicles. Traffic projections for the years 1997 and 2020 are shown in Figures 3A and 3B. 7 H. Existing Facility Capacity Analysis The concept of level of service (LOS) is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic system and how these conditions are perceived by motorists and/or passengers. A level-of-service definition generally describes these conditions in tgrms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Six levels are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operational conditions and • LOS F representing the worst. Mainline capacity analyses were performed on the existing two-lane highway for the current year (1997) and the existing two-lane and proposed five- lane highway for the construction year (2000), and the design year (2020) (see Table 4A). TABLE 4A MAINLINE CAPACITY ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) SEGMENT ON US 23B 1997 2000 2020 (no-build) (no-build) From Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove E E F Road) SR 1191 to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) E E F SR 1196 to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Rd.) E E F SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) A A B The results of the capacity analysis illustrate the need for widening existing US 23B. Table 4A shows that the current (1997) traffic which utilizes the facility is experiencing a high level of congestion. In considering the expected LOS in the design year (2020) under the "no-build" scenario, it is anticipated that traffic congestion will worsen along the project corridor. These results provide justification for the proposed improvements discussed in this report. This analysis also shows that widening the existing facility would significantly improve the level of service along the project. Where curve realignment and resurfacing of the existing facility is proposed, the LOS is anticipated to remain essentially the same. 2. Intersection Analysis Intersection capacity analyses were performed for major intersections due to heavy turning movements anticipated at these locations. Table 4B shows the level of service (LOS) for the existing conditions at unsignalized intersections and Table 4C shows the LOS for the existing conditions at Marshall Street and SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), the currently signalized intersections along the study corridor. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 4B ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) INTERSECTION WITH 1997 2000 2020 US 23B (no-build) (no-build) SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove FB FB F/C Road) SR 1193 (Nesbitt Street) D/A DB FB SR 1195 (Sims Circle D/A EB FB Road) SR 1250 (Sims Circle) D/A FB F/C SR 1196 (East Howell FB FB F/C Mills) SR 1267 (Industrial Park CB CB F/C Drive) NOTE. The level of service results are divided into two parts: left and right Turns (minor streewpieejI turn (US 23B). 9 • NOTE. The level of service results are divided into two parts: lowest LOS between left and right turns (minor streets)/lowest LOS between northbound and southbound movements (US 23B). SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 4C ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) INTERSECTION WITH 1997 2000 2020 US 23B (no-build) (no-build) Marshall Street C/B D/B F/C SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) C/B C/B C/E US 23B is designated a major thoroughfare on the Waynesville/Hazelwood Thoroughfare Plan, which was adopted in 1979 (see Figure 4). For design purposes, US 23B is considered a rural collector. A comparison of accident rates along US 23B and the statewide rates for rural two-lane "US" routes is shown in Table 5, below. The rates shown for US 23B were obtained from studies conducted from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 1996. The statewide rates were obtained from studies conducted from 1992 through 1994. TABLE 5 ACCIDENT RATES (PER 100 MILLION VEHICLE KILOMETERS [MVK[) ACCIDENT TYPE RATES ALONG US 23B HAYWOOD COUNTY STATEWIDE AVERAGE FOR "US PRIMARY ROUTES" (2-LANES) All Accidents 219.0 173.4 Fatal 0.0 2.5 Non-Fatal 93.1 82.2 Nighttime 35.3 49.0 Wet Conditions 47.8 41.5 It is anticipated the proposed project will result in a safer facility by providing additional lanes and improving sight distance. 10 II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Recommended Alternate TIP Project R-2210 A proposes to widen existing US 23B to a five-lane curb and gutter facility from Marshall Street to 0.4 kilometers (km) (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive). This project will utilize a combination of east side, west side, and symmetrical widening of US 23B in an effort to minimize overall impacts to the natural and human environment. No widening is proposed for US 23 Businness from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve realignment and resurfacing improvements, where warranted, are proposed for this section of roadway. B. Project Length The approximate length of the proposed project is 3.5 kilometers (km) (2.2 miles). C. Cross Section Description It is recommended that US 23B be improved to a five-lane, 20.4-meter (68-foot) (face to face of curbs) curb and gutter section from Marshall Street to 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267. From 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 to SR 1801, US 23B will remain a four-lane, 14.6-meter (49-foot) curb and gutter section. This section includes a 78-meter (260-foot) long and 1.2-meter (4-foot) wide concrete island along US 2313, from approximately 200 meters (680 feeet) south of SR 1801 to 125 meters (420 feet) south of SR 1801. D. Right of Way Generally, the proposed right-of-way width for this project will be 30 meters (100 feet); however, areas with more severe terrain and/or curvature may require additional right of way. E. Access Control No additional control of access is proposed for this project due to the need to provide access to existing residences, businesses, and public facilities. F. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control All roadways will intersect the project at grade. All intersecting roadways will have stop sign control, with the exception of the intersections of US 23B with Marshall Street, US 19-23-74/SR 1801, and SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road); these three intersections will be signalized. II • At all intersections along?the"proposed project, US 23B will be widened to five lanes, including two northbound through lanes, two southbound through lanes, and an exclusive left-turn lane in the northbound and southbound directions. Table 6 describes the configurations of the three intersecting roads with US 23B that are proposed for improvements in conjunction with this project. 1 TABLE 6 PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTING STREET WITH TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT US 23B SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) Addition of an exclusive right-turn lane on northbound US 23B and an exclusive right- turn lane on westbound SR 1818 Lake Junaluska Middle School (LJMS) Addition of exclusive right-turn lanes on entrance/SR 1250 (Sims Road) northbound approach of US 23B and westbound approach of LJMS entrance. SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) Add signal, provide an exclusive right-turn lane on the southbound approach of US 2313, and provide an exclusive left-turn lane on eastbound SR 1196. G. Level of Service and Area Road Network According to the results of the capacity analysis which was conducted along US 23B within the study corridor, widening the existing facility would improve the overall level of service (LOS) along the project. The lowest LOS along the mainline on the most southern section (Marshall Street to SR 1191 (Francis Farm Road)) dictates the LOS on the mainline. For this reason, it is anticipated that traffic on US 23B will operate at LOS C in the design year (2020) (see Table 7A, below). Where realignment and resurfacing of the existing four-lane facility is proposed, the LOS along US 23B north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) is anticipated to remain essentially the same. 12 MAINLINE CAPACITY ANALYSIS TABLE 7A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) SEGMENT ON US 23B 2000 2020 From Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove A C Road) SR 1818 to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) A B SR 1196 to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) A B SR 1267 to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road A B Although improvements to three intersecting roads with US 23B (SR 1191 (Francis Farm Road), SR 1250 (Sims Road), and SR 1196 (Howell Mills Road)) will be performed in conjunction with this project, it is anticipated that the LOS for intersecting roads within the study corridor will, in general, remain the same (see Figures 7B and 7C, below). UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 7B ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) INTERSECTION WITH 2000 2020 US 23B SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove FB F/C Road) SR 1193 (Nesbitt Street) FB F/C SR 1195 (Sims Circle FB F/C Road) SR 1250 (Sims Circle) FB F/C SR 1267 (Industrial Park FB F/C Drive) NOTE. The level olservice results are divided into two parts: tejt ana rtgnt turns (minor sireets)11eJ1 turns (US 23B). 13 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY TABLE 7C ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) (PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) INTERSECTION WITH 2000 2020 US 23B Marshall Street CB D/B SR 1196 (East Howell Mill B/A BB Road) SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) CB CB NOTE. The level of service results are divided into two parts: lowest LOS between left and right turns (minor streets)/lowest LOS between northbound and southbound movements (US 23B). As shown in Table 7B, the capacity analysis for the minor streets (left and right turns) yields LOS F. Two scenarios were evaluated to improve the level of service for minor streets along the proposed project: geometric revisions (lane additions) and signalization. The addition of lanes on minor streets would not result in an improvement to the LOS of the intersection; therefore, geometric revisions were not recommended. Intersections that operate at an overall level of service F do not necessarily warrant signalization. The intersecting roads with US 23B not recommended for improvements in conjunction with this project have such low traffic volumes (current year and design year) that signals are not justified. Therefore, signalization of these intersections is not currently recommended. However, these intersections will be monitored and signals installed when warranted. It is noted that US 23B, south of Marshall Street, the southern project limit, is a three-lane, curb and gutter roadway; therefore, motorists traveling south on US 23B may experience a decrease in the LOS in the vicinity of Marshall Street as a result of the transition from a five-lane to a three-lane facility. In the vicinity of SR 1801, the northern project terminal, and the US 19-23-74 interchange which is located adjacent to the northern project terminal (see Figure 2), no changes to US 23B are proposed in conjunction with this project. This area of the project corridor will remain relatively unchanged; therefore, no improvement or degradation in the LOS for the US 19-23-74 interchange or US 23B north of SR 1801 is anticipated. s H. Bridges and/or Culvert A culvert, located approximately 0.4 km (.25 mile) north of SR 1802 (Francis Farm Road), accommodates flow from Raccoon Creek. This culvert consists of a 14 4.2-meter x 2.7-meter (14-foot x 9-foot) bottomless, single-barrel reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). This culvert is approximately 11.4 meters (38 feet) in length along its centerline. It has been determined that this culvert is not structurally sufficient to accommodate the increased traffic loading associated with the proposed project. Therefore, it is recommended to remove the existing culvert and replace it with a double- barrel 3.7-meter x 3.0-meter (12-foot x 10-foot) RCBC. Because Raccoon Creek contains no protected trout, the proposed structure is not required to be bottomless. Culvert inverts will be buried 0.3 meter (1 foot) below the existing stream bed. ' Any other drainage structures (such as pipes) that are located along the project will be retained and extended to accommodate the widened roadway. The existing 4.6-meter (15-foot) corrugated metal pipe located to the west of US 23B will be extended southward to accommodate improvements proposed for the US 23B/SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road) intersection. I. Design Speed With the exception of the segment of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) where the design speed will be 60 km/h (35 mph), the proposed design speed is 80 km/h (50 mph) throughout the project. The existing sidewalks located on both sides of US 23B, from Marshall Street northward approximately 65 meters (220 feet) to East Street, will be replaced with 1.5-meter (5-foot) sidewalks. Per current NCDOT policy, new pedestrian facilities are funded jointly by NCDOT and the municipality having jurisdiction. However, this project is not located within the corporate limits of the Town of Waynesville; the project is located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town of Waynesville. Haywood County has requested additional pedestrian facilities (see Appendix A, page A-25) along the west side of US 23B from East Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road); accordingly, Town of Waynesville and Haywood County staff are coordinating with NCDOT to determine the appropriate funding and maintenance responsibilities and agreements which will be required regarding the construction of the new pedestrian facilities along US 23B (see Appendix A, pages A-25, A-26, and A-29 through A-31). A written agreement between NCDOT and the Town and/or County will be executed prior to construction of the proposed project. According to the Town of Waynesville, the construction of these additional pedestrian facilities, as described above, is the third and final element of the Waynesville Pedestrian Facility Plan (as discussed in Section I.F.13). K. Bicycle Accommodations The NCDOT's Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation recommends 15 • 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside lanes to accommodate bicycles. Town of Waynesville and Haywood County officials have also requested bicycle accommodations along the proposed project. Bicycle accommodations, including the incorporation of bicycle-safe grates, can be incorporated into the project by reducing berm widths for both sides of the proposed roadway from 3.0 meters (10 feet) to 2.4 meters (8 feet) and providing additional pavement width to achieve the 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside lanes. The NCDOT will incorporate these accommodations into the project (see Figure 5). L. Greenways No improvements to existing greenways are proposed in conjunction with this project. M. Landscaping No special landscaping is currently proposed by FHWA or NCDOT in conjunction with this project. N. Noise Barriers No noise barriers are proposed for this project. 0. Multiple Use of Space Right of way along the project will be utilized for public utilities (within certain limitations). P. Changes in the State Highway System No changes in the State Highway System are anticipated. Q. Railroads Southern Railway is located west of US 23B and is parallel to the proposed project (see Figure 2). No conflicts with this railway are anticipated to result from the improvements to US 23B. R. Degree of Utility Conflicts Public Service of North Carolina (PSNC) is currently involved in preliminary planning for the installment of gas lines along the east side of US 23B. Coordination between NCDOT and PSNC is underway. It is anticipated that the project will impact power lines, sewer systems, telephone lines, and underground water lines. 16 S. Anticipated Design Exceptions Due to the severe vertical curvature along this segment of US 2313, a design speed exception will be necessary from Marshall Street to SR 1818. The proposed design speed for this segment will be 60 km/h (35 mph). T. Cost Estimates Cost estimates for the proposed project are as follows: CONSTRUCTION RIGHT OF WAY TOTAL COST 6,600,000 3,941,000 $ 10,541,000 U. Staged Construction The portion of this project which includes construction of the culvert at Raccoon Creek will be stage constructed. First, the two new lanes over the new culvert will be constructed immediately east of the existing culvert to accommodate maintenance of traffic during construction. Traffic will then be shifted onto the new travelway. The next phase will consist of demolishing the existing culvert and extending the new travelway westward to complete the new culvert. V. ' Special Permits Required It is anticipated that COE Nationwide Permits #14 (minor road crossings) and/or #26 (above headwaters) are applicable for this project. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from DEHNR-DWQ for activities resulting in a discharge into any streams involved with this project. Coordination with NCWRC will continue throughout project development and the permit application phase since the project is located in a designated "trout" county. This project lies within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watershed. Planning and construction of the widening project will require compliance with the TVA's "Stream Modification Policy" regarding channelization, modification, renovation of waters subject to TVA actions. W. Geodetic Survey Markers 0 It is anticipated this project will impact five (5) geodetic survey markers. The North Carolina Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction. •uoilruodsunu ?(umgBiq 30 luauianoiduii IpjauaS all utog panuap aq Ipm sigauaq atu mooo-otoos loajtpul auzil Ianpn paanpaj pup `uotlpjado aiotgan ja3ps pup luatagja ojoui oq Ipm uoigoi put, `aluls `XI!ununuoo agl of slgauoq agl `sluauxanoiduu pasodoid agl3o linsai p sy Z ?titap3 pouap!m agl3o linsoi u sr suoiltpuoo snopimq Suilsixo ail ui uoilonpoi p aouauadxa ? uw (ootmisip IgSis pmpuplsgns ui Suillnsaj) smaNs snopjmq muq Alluauno gatlgm spuoj Suiloasjalui autos `Xlluuotj!ppV 'It,tlualod luaptom ail Sutonpoi `snip `pup aoumsip lgSts pasrwoui Suiptnojd Xq sppoi Suilsixa uo laajja antltsod p ui linsaj ll!m g£Z Sfl of sluauxanojdun aql lt,gl palpdioilup si ll ?Cpnls ,C1tlgtspa? job poinpagos Xlluouno si loafojd siq L 'XlunoD poonn, RH ut Xj!pot,3 aut,l-tllnui of laaxlS uivw uaPtM - '9 •uoilowlsuoo put, uotltsinbou ,Cron 3o-lggu (b00Z jal?u) -max lsd jo3 palnpagos si loafojd stgZ •sluaujanoiduu powtoossp put, uoiwoolaj puo.i ootnias pup dumi sopnioui loofojd stg1, •AlunoD poo^nAuH ut g£Z Sfl gl!m aSuugojalui bL-£Z-6I Sfl amSguoaall - 'uotlaiulsuoa pup uotltsinbot, Apnn 3o-lgSu (b00Z jol3p) mom lsod joj palnpagos are loafojd stgl jo sued jaglo `alalduioo o.m loafojd stgi jo suotuod •Xluno:) poonnAUH ui Ob-I of bL-£Z-61 Sfl tuoj.I 60Z DM :LTT' - b •Xiantloadsaj `ZOOZ pup IOOZ snak luosi3 ui uiSoq of painpagos are uoilon.ilsuoo pup uotltsinbot, Xem 3o-lggr XlunoD pOOmXRH III laalD Pupiga2l jano 61 Sf1 uo b6 •oM aSpug aopldoW :UFt-tj £ 'ZOOZ maA Iposi j iol poinpagos d jano (Xluo aupl si uoiloiulsuoD •,ClunoD poonn, t'H 111 100-10 puplgor punogguou) bL-£Z Sfl uo SS I •otq aSpug aoplda-8 Z 'L661 MOA ipasi3 ui uoiloiulsuoo joj painpagos si loafojd sigj, •XlunoD poonnXt,H ut IaajD puuigord jano onuand pXog uo 59Z 'otq aSpug amida21 - uaju loafojd ail ui sloafojd GILL jaglo xis are ajagl X • v Li put, 8uinjinsai iouiuz pug `(anizQ Imd IgulsnpuI) L9ZI -dS3o gpou (ajtui SZ'0) Ui b'0 Aloluunxoiddu of joouS IiugsauW tuoi3 g£Z Sf1.Io 8uluap!m iuoulaunuAs puu `Isom `lsua jo uoilgutquioo d - PUB `10812IS of L9ZI NS 3o quou (optu SZ'0) unl b'0 Aloluuzixo.zddg uiog 8wnjmsax pug `L9ZI -HS jo gl,zou (aiiul 9Z'0) unl b'0 Xlalgunxoiddg of laagS IlggsmW utog g£Z Sf13o 8uiuap!m juoulauzuiAs pug `Isom `lsuo jo uotluuiqutoo d - T? :loafold pasodold og1jo; poipnps a.zam souguaos 8uiuap!m oml papuaunuooaz lou ut antlgudallg sill `aIOJ310141 •sasuaJoui puuuiap 3Ujgj1 su amin3 oq1 ui iopuuoa uotlgliodsuuu Suilsixa all 8uoiu Alaigs pun Wool; agjual jo uoilg.zoualop 8umuiluoa u ui llnsw pjnom loafoid aqp jo luauzauodlsod Q 'S4iji3u3 k6,migBiq 8utlsix0 ug JO luauzanojdwi aqp sanlonui loafoid 3q1 puu ton aql ui uoiluliodsugil jo opow luuuiuzop ag1 si uoiluuodsuu.4 ? RmlgSlll •anilgudallg alquoilou.cd u aq of patapisuoo si uoilgliodsurnjo apow alguzallu ON •Papuaunuooaa 1ou st antlgudaplg slip `aJoJaiags -sluauIanojdtw A-empuoi Bullglissaoau `spugtuaP ogjuzl pasuanui aououodxo of anuiluoo pjnom a1noj8utlsixo ags •,Cliuioi^ loofoid aqp ut salnoi 8uilsixa jo Alajus pug ,Cptogduo ogjtlll all uo 13a,I33 antlisod ou aq pjnom axagl `loaCold oqp wog llnsoi of poludionuu are lugs slogdun Iuluouzuojinua paliuzij aql pionu pjnom anilguiallg sigp g8nogllV « - „ 'g •(puo21 JQUFI kuaf) 1081 NS of L9ZI NS JO TJOU (aliut SZ'0) Ui l,•0 woij `Palutunm oiogm `S£Z Sf13o 8uiogj.nsai pug luaunz8iluoi zoulw z pug `.(anuQ )lJud igiilsnpuI) L9ZI 2IS3o glaou (al!w SZ'0) uult b'0 of laailS IiugSMW wog xempuoi iapln8 pug qma `augj-ang g 01 g£Z Sfl 8uiuaPTM :sluautanoiduui 8uinnollo3 all JO SISISU03 ancluuJQjIle papuaunuooaJ aqs tl III 81 uoilelapisuoo laqunl u1o.j paddolp seen uotlepuauuuooal s!ql `a103alaq jL 'polvdioilug ale legl saloigan, Suiuml 103 S131UUOO aSg101S pue SS03OU julnoigan, lol leilualod agl pue `suoileoolal letluopisal `uoilistnbae Aenn-to-1iisu IeuoTlippU 1o3 paou aq1 Sutpnloui `spuduli poluuuunnun 1glanas osnuo plnonm puu aouulsip uogs u gons 1oI alquoilosld lou seen `uotloas augl-ang pasodold oql gltnn uoilounfuoo ui `uoiloas luoidAl papinip-ugipaiu `augl-moj aql Imp pauiuualap seen 11 •loafold agl jo lapuisulal 3g1101 pasodold aq Plnonm `paluguenn alagnn `sluauianoldtui 8uiou31nso-d •uoiloas 1aunS pug qmo `auul-ang u o1 pouapinn aq plnonm loafold xpjo lapuisuial aq1 `lsixa Alluauno souel-pinu1 alagnn `1081 WS 01 L9ZI 2IS3o guou W04 g£Z SflJO WPM aql jo uoildaoxo 3111 quM •(pgO21 uuu3 si3uel3) Z08I 2IS 01 00011S si3uul3) 1611 2IS 30 ?C1!uioin aql LUOig u01130S papinip-ueipacu `ausl-moI u 3o uoisinold a p papnloui `sluiogjo A1unoD pooMAUH pug ai1insauAuM Io unnoZ Xq Apnls ioj polsanbal `aniluu1011161 pu03as aqs (LOOZ ul d SO-I) aoinlaS JO JOAD I olqulisopun uu it, pauoilounj wg1,Clilioul a pus smog ogjun ojusun nnollu pinonm g£Z Sfl Suolg saumlon og3gll paloafold asnuoaq uoilglapisuoo laqunl uio13 paddolp SLIM an,ilg[ualju sign •suoiloos asogl loI pasodold oq Plnonn `palueugM a1agM `sluauzanoldun dumujmsal `1081 dS Io glnos of L9Z 12IS 3o quou (optu SZ'0) M V-0 Xiolgunxolddu u1o4 pus 100-11S lsgg of plenmquou 10011S Iiugs.MW tUO4 f4!j!og3 auul-tljnui g st Slluauno 8£Z Sfl aouiS 'L9ZI 2ISIo quou (aliut SZ'0) 1I1?I b'0 0113a?1S lssg utog uotloas 1a11nS pug qmo (sgm3 JO aoel 01 aoel) (1oo3-00 131aut-ZI `0uul-391111 g of g£Z Sfl uopinm of pasodold OAilgu1011e 1s1g aqZ •paipnls alarm suoiloos leoid,C1 OUTAMA glinn san,ilgulallu ones s9A!116lU.I3119TagT6 3 • •suoileoolal ssouisnq pug lsiluopisal luuoilippu loI luilualod aq1 pus `loafold xgjo suoiuod autos Suolg uremal Sutlsixa 313AOS a p `sTmj aSulols punoAnpun 3o aouosald aql `X1!uiotn, loafold aq1 ui saipoq 1alunm ui saSuugo lauuugo Suionpui 1o3 ?lil!q!ssod aq1 `saould oilolsiH 301alsiSO-d lsuoiluN 3111 ui Suilsil 1o3 3lq!2ila X11upualod saiuadold jo aouasald aq1 of anp palopisuoo 1ou seen loafold pasodold aql 1nog8no ql Ouiuapinm luoulauiiuXs 10 `apis 1SOM `apis lsea anisnloxg ' 1081 'US 01 L9Z I NS 30 quou (31!01 SZ'0) uq b'0 X131uu1txolddu uiog `palugtl> m olagnn `luauzuStlual 61 •snutuual noafold tuaglaou aql spmmol glnnotS luunsnput pulp loafoad agl jo pua tpnos ail Suole paloadxa st glnnozS lriaiautu m uuojtun aligns t,an loafoad otp lnogSnoagl paloadxa st glnnojS lutluaptsat atU •gjmozS luulsnput put, letouatuutoo autos Blinn gvAoiS asn purl lt,tluoptsaa ,Clttur3-alSuts Ajlm uud aououodxa of poludtailuu st uaau noafoud aql `sjuiagjo Sum ut,ld Irool of Suiptoaad •suotlulnSai uotstntpgns pue Suiuoz sootojuo Xlto aqZ •poldope XlletoUjo uaaq aanau suq ueld asn purl sell lnq `loot aout,ptnS asn pool s,Xlto aql su posn st gotgnn `LL6I ut padolaAap `urld asn purl a suq Xlto aqs •alltnsau,CrM 3o XltD atpjo uotlotpsunf Sutuoz put, Sumurld ail utgltnn paleool st ((aAUQ 3laed iuulsnpuI) L9ZI 2IS3o quou (opw SZ'0) ui b•0 01 Jowls lltgSteyg uto.tj) sluautaAoidun posodoid atpjo ,uuoft,tu atl L •sasn letotautuuoo ,CAuoq pur lrulsnput lgSti lo3 souoz anrq tuttuuan loafoid atll 30 ,CltutotA aql ut scare tpog •sasn lutozau moo duns lo3 pauoz sem suq SutuutSaq loafoad aqn 1t, uam aqs •sasn puul lutnuoptsai (,Cntsuop umtpatu) t,--d of (Xltsuop Wool) Z--d joj ,Ciuetuud pauoz st uatu loafold otU 'dtR a q -ioptuoo loafoid ain Suolu puul podolanapun put, popoom jo Suaau paaalluos an O.Ioq L •u2m loofoid oql jo glnos (altut 5'0) ui 8'0 Xioleuttxoaddu paluool st IlUpue,l aiitASau,CrM ag 1, •(aAti(I Claud iuunsnpuI) L9ZI dS uo palt,ool st lied lrulsnpul alltASau,frM 31U •It,utuual loo fold uaaglnos ago lu uare atp ut palrool aau sasn lutolauzutoo dues autos `lloptuoo loafoad aql gSnoail sasn lrtoaaunuoo polouros aau atagiL •sasn Iutluaptsai ,Cltturj-alSuts,Cntsuap-umtpauu of Wool st uaar loafoad agl ut • asn purl Slututad ;)q jL 'sasn It,toaauutuoo autos puu sasn purl Iutluaptsaa jo xnu panums u gltnn poztut,gan su pazualouaugo st uaau loafoad aqZ tl Al OZ 21 d. Project Consistency With Local Plans In both NCDOT's TIP and the Waynesville Thoroughfare Plan, US 23B was among the roadways perceived by local officials as most in need of improvement. Additional justification for the project comes from the need to increase the safety and capacity of US 23B by the proposed improvements. • 2. GeoEmphical and Neighborhood Characteristics Haywood County is located in the western section of the state and is bounded by Buncombe, Henderson, Jackson, Madison, Swain, and Transylvania Counties, as well as the State of Tennessee. As of September, 1996, the total population in Haywood County is 46,942, consisting of 22,382 males and 24,560 females. The total number of minorities is less than 1,000. The proposed corridor is located in a densely populated mountainous community that follows existing US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). The development along the proposed project site consists of residential, commercial, and institutional establishments. It is estimated that four (4) residential and seven (7) business relocations will result from the implementation of Alternate 2 (Recommended). It is anticipated that adequate replacement housing will be available for any relocatees. The relocation report is included in Appendix D (see pages D-1 and D-2). It is the policy of the NCDOT to insure that comparable replacement housing will be available prior to construction of federal and state assisted projects. The NCDOT has the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of moving: Relocation Assistance Relocation Assistance Payments Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or "Rent Supplement." See Appendix D for further discussion of the NCDOT Relocations Programs (see pages D-3 and D-4). 22 4. Public Facilities Public facilities located along the proposed corridor include the Plumbline Baptist Church, Junaluska Elementary School, and Tuscola High School. The proposed project is not anticipated to affect any of these public facilities. 5. Social Impacts It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a positive social impact. These positive impacts will be derived from those persons utilizing the proposed highway facility; convenience and travel safety will be enhanced. In addition, it is anticipated that businesses in the project area will experience a positive economic thrust due to improved access and reduction in congestion. Public facilities will probably benefit as a result of the improved visibility and accessibility. 6. Executive Order 12898 requires that each federal agency, to the greatest extent allowed by law, administer and implement its programs, policies, and activities that affect human health or the environment so as to identify and avoid "disproportionately high and adverse" effects on minority and low-income populations. The proposed project will not segment any existing minority community or separate residential areas from nearby services, such as schools, businesses, or parks. None of the potential relocatees are minorities nor are any of the relocatees considered low income. A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on May 8, 1997 at the Lake Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria in Waynesville to gather input from the public on the proposed project. Input solicited as a result of the workshop and subsequent substantive concerns submitted to FHWA and NCDOT have been considered and incorporated into the project, as practicable. Based on project studies and public involvement incorporated into this project's development, this project has been implemented in accordance with Executive Order 12898. 23 This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires that if a federally funded, licensed, or permitted project has an effect on a property listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) will be given the opportunity to comment. • Potential historic architectural and archaeological resources within the proposed project corridor were assessed. Based on investigations, the proposed project will not affect cultural resources. The project is in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. a. Historic Architectural Resources To comply with Section 106, the Area of Potential Effect (APE) of the subject project was reviewed by NCDOT historic architectural staff. The Miller-Francis House is located approximately 30 meters (100 feet) from the existing right-of-way boundary approximately 0.3 km (0.19 miles) south of SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) on the west side of US 2313; the property has been determined to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. SHPO has concurred with the FHWA's determination that the project, as proposed, will not have an adverse effect on Miller-Francis House (see Appendix A, pages A-7 and A-8) provided the following conditions are incorporated into the project plans and special provisions: Installation of protective fencing along the property (right of way) easement line. If roots are encountered during construction, the contractor is required to cleanly cut them and exercise good tree protection practices. Several additional properties over fifty years old are located within the APE; however, these properties are not listed in or considered eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and no further evaluation of these properties is necessary. The SHPO has concurred with this determination (see Appendix A, page A-9). Since there are no other properties either listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places within the APE of this undertaking, no further compliance with either Section 106 or the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 is necessary. 24 b. Archaeological Resources An archaeological investigation within the proposed project corridor was conducted by NCDOT archaeological staff. No evidence of archaeological resources was discovered within the APE of the undertaking. FHWA and NCDOT have determined that the proposed project will not involve significant archaeological resources. SHPO has concurred with these determinations, and no further archaeological evaluation is required (see Appendix, page A-10). B. Section 4(D. and Section 6(f) Resources Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that publicly owned land from a public park, recreation area, historic site, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge of national, state, or local significance may be used for a federal-aid project only if: 1. There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land, and 2. Such a highway program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to Section 4(f) lands resulting from such use. The only Section 4(f) property identified along the project corridor is the Miller-Francis House, located approximately 0.3 km (0.19 mile) south of SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road) on the west side of US 23B; this property is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The recommended alternate, Alternate 2, was developed to avoid impacts to this National Register-eligible property. Measures, such as alignment shifts, have been taken to avoid encroachment on this property. The SHPO has concurred with the FHWA's determination that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the historic property (see Appendix A, pages A-7 and A-8). No easements, temporary or permanent, will be acquired within the eligible property's boundary. This completes compliance of Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended. 2, Section 4(fl Rem sources Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 states that "no property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the Secretary [of the Department of the Interior], be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses." wnobxnan,L) uotiapuup `(-dds nonisag) anosaj sapniout wag Suumooo uonulasan •JJo-utu aatt,nnumis Suualig Aq satltununuoo Suipunouns puu Ampuol atp uoamlaq sjajnq su jot, snpinogs pro-j -Suttsan.req put, SutzalS g2nonp aouugmmsip snonunuoo santaoaa UOIIIK020n otp ataigm `spiag doio 32tio3 puu am;sud 3o ;sisuoo ron Xpnts atp uitp!m spiag iumlinou8t, atU wumowtutu iutaua8 puu Sutnnotu juanba4 WOW antaoaa sadt,ospuuj ssautsnq put, iutluoptsa21 -suotluotiddu aptotgaaq puu Sumout oipouad ,Ciuo Sutntaoat `pauiutututu XiauinSaut am szapinogs puog -spiag iumujnouSu puu `saduospuui ssautsnq puu iutluoptsat `siapinogs puoi :,Cttuntuutoo sitp ut papniout an sotlsuaioungo mittuts Sutltgtgxa sluttguq iuaanas Aiuntutuoa paq.in;siQ/pauiv;uivW •saoptuoo 3uautanotu St, 10 saniunwoddo 2utSuio3 put, aaiiags .to3 satttununuoo tpoq 1toidxa Ipm uaau Aptns otp unp!m mooo of AIa)iti satoads 1uunu3 -uan Xpnjs atp uttptnn luatudoianap ol anp utacp uaanuaq ouoz uotttsuuu tuuogtuSts u lnotp!m pougap Iiam om uam Xpnts otp uttptnn souupunoq,CttttnunuoD -isatoj poomptuq poxitu pttu pagmtsip/poutmututu Tan Apnis loafoid atp ui pagttuopt are satltununuoo iutnsauaj oml B SIOIJJH IRTUOUIUMrAu3 Q -uo.m oqj ui sootntas put, `sjuugotaui `saa,Coiduta `sluoptsaa toi Aouatogia ianun pasuaaout optnotd iit^n `umt ut `stgZ •ioptuoo toafoid otp Suoiu uottsosuoo autos Sutluutuxtia Xq Xliaua puu atutl OARS XUMqSl ',44t1tou3 M;)U aq; Aq paptnoid ,Cltitgtssaoou panotdun otp Aq paouuqua aq limn saotnaas put, spoo83o uottugodsuun atp `uontppu ui -sassoutsnq asatp Sunuanbag s;suotout oqi ioj Aititou3 StmtjStq iayt,s u 3o uotstnoad atp of anp sjuatuanozdtut , Lmq&q pasodoid atp tuog tgauaq iit^n f4tununuoo ssautsnq otp jutp paludtotlut, st 11 luao.tad b'£ JO 06L JO it,iot lu;)wXoidwoun ut, t3ai stgi -paXoidtua Aiin3umS woo suosaad o 'OLO £Z3oaoao3.togui Iunolt,Pug D Poonn,CuH toI o 06Z`ZZ`iulOlstg13OIn ,Ctuno att,otput 9661 `aagtuatdaS io3 soirwim a3.to3 Joqui uutitnto uutioat,D q)IOM ags, •spun3 (;)9 uottoaS 3o aout,lsissu gltnn podoianap .to pattnbou uaaq anuq gotgnn aoptuoo toafo.td pasodotd aqt unplm sawadotd ou m amu SZ -luauaaluas uuuznq Xq paptnojd salts Butlsou pun sjapaai 3o aSslusnps 03Im1 jjyA satoads asagZ -(snatlsatuop iassnd) moulds asnoq put, `(snuntataopnl sn.iogiorGq,L) uajm mutiojnD `(stsuautlwoo sn.tvd) aapt,)jotgo miloano `(sn'uolo.&*iw snpdnl) utgoj umououtd `(vano.iovtu vptvuaZ) anop futumout `(suaosagnd saptootd) .taxoodpoom Ammop apnjout satltunuoddo futft,joj puu a)Bnjw joj lmltgmq stgl azijtln of AjoN i satoads ustnd •u01lL1a80n snooomgiaq put, sgntgs uo aSutoj of slmltgt,g pagtnistp put, splaU uado aql aztjtln Ipm (snuvpt.tob(snSvl!,tlfS) Itt,luolloo uaalst,a aqy -satltunuoddo 2ut2t,joj joj lt,ltgt,q stgl luanbag Ipm lmgl slnuauat,ua antldt,pu fCjan ajm (.rolol uodaodd) uoooot,j put, (yuytui8.ua stgdlapt(7) uanssodo 910311n aq L -Imualsut lut,ld pum `sloasut `suuonnqut,a uodn paaj put, sjauunl antsualxa alt,nmoxa sajout ujalst,g 'spjatg u AO.IS tano pus Xpaam ut Ilam su ,Cllsnba saop 11 •sosnogamtA pus `slummulsaj `sosnoq `sujuq ut lallags pus pooj spug 1! aaaigm satlintlom untunq gl!m uotlt,toossm ut punoj st asnoua asnoq aq,l, -(snoilvnbv sndolooS) alotu cualst,a put, `(vuvd stmid, 0) majgs lssal `(snlnosntu snN) asnoua asnoq `(snoi,gmjou snllvy) lt,i XLAuoN atp ajm ?Cltunuautoo pagmistpjpoutnlutntu aql utgltnn mooo Xluouatuoo Imp slsum ua jlmuaS -spjag uado aql ut 319aiD uoooou'd jo sTmq agl Suolu punoj st (stsuadva suailvdtul) paam-IwAa f -(•dds .iaisd) stalst, put, `paannow `pamploO `moinf, `(snsoglnq snlnaunuvy) dnaiaunq `(vloivo snonvQ) loumo pl!m `janolo apnjout 1ualxa jassal n of mooo lt,gl satoads antlsla20n -anosaj Xq palnutuaop st splog lumllnougu aql utglim uotlt,l023n -maju loafojd ag1 jo uotljod jmjluao aql ut paluool xijumog st t,a.m stgZ -joajD uoooou-d 3o utt,ldpoog aql uttp!m luosajd an uotlanpotd dojo aftoj put, amisud joj pasn on ingl splag lumllnoti$d -(-dds yt ry?t81Q) ssui2q uo purr `sutmlusld `(dds u?ntlofi.r,L) janolo `anosaj Aq palt,utuaop ojm sloom umu-I -(-dds sn.radtunf) jadtunf pun `(-dds yfngl) amltnt, jogn `(-dds xalj) satllogjo sptjgfq jt,luauamujo snounn `(v.ign i sno.tana) 3Imo poi tuaquou `(satgv vaotd) aotuds ?(tAuotq `(s:suapvuya yBns,L) looltuaq tualsma `(sngo tjs snutd) outd al!gm `(-dds uo.,puapopogd) malmzm `(vpt.iolf snu.toD) poom2op 2uuamoU sapniout sadmospuul ssautsnq pun jt,tluaptsaj Wm palmtaossu uotlmlaSan • •(-dds vtsoigwV) p3;)mOuj pus `(tuntlofallttu vall!goV) moinX `(•dds oSvprloS) pojuoploO `(varuodvf Maatuo7) al3lonsXauoq asaut,duf `(slsuatuag2ally sngny) fajaglomjq `(suvatpvd uodpuapoatxol) X^t uostod `(snotutlgrtA uogodoipuV) aiipastuoojq Xq patdnooo am aoumualutmm luanbojU ssal Butntaoaj smajd •(ylvloaauvl oSviuvld) utnlut,ld ujogNonq put, `(-dds vlo!A) slajotn `(-dds tuntloft.q) janojo `(-dds stlvxp) lauos poom `(alvutarffo 9Z 27 The American kestrel (Falco sparverius) will forage on small birds and mammals in this community. Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) and black racer (Coluber constrictor) frequent open and disturbed habitats. They will find suitable shelter and foraging opportunities in proximity with human • activities. Mixed Hardwood Forest 4 Mixed hardwood forest is present in a variety of sizes and ages within the project area. All areas of this forest have had some degree of disturbance and include invasive ornamentals originating from nearby urban landscapes. Residential and commercial activities have displaced the original forest with disturbed habitat. The larger parcels of this community type are located in the northeastern third of the project area. Smaller remnants of the mixed hardwood forest community are situated within the maintained/disturbed community. The canopy of the larger parcels is dominated by white oak (Quercus albs), red oak (Q. rubra), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa). Other representatives of the canopy include black walnut (Juglands nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), and black locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia). Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) occur along the edges of this community. The shrub layer consists of flowering dogwood, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and saplings of the canopy layer. Invasive species include privet (Ligustrum spp.), which was locally dense, and prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americana). Vines observed within this community formed a dense cover, especially on the outer edges of this community. Representative vine species include bittersweet (Celastrus scandens), grape (Vitis spp.), poison ivy, and Japanese honeysuckle. The herb layer was fairly sparse due to the dense shrub and vine layers. Herbaceous vegetation includes Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), and spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata). The mixed hardwood forest offers habitat for a variety of fauna. The gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Virginia opossum, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), raccoon, eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), and woodchuck (Marmota monax) are inhabitants of this community. The presence of stratification provides habitat for avian species such as the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), red-bellied woodpecker 28 (Melanerpes carolinus), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens). Reptilian species include the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus), and black racer. Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) serves a predatory role by feeding on small vertebrates. • b. Aquatic Communities Aquatic communities impacted by the proposed project include Raccoon Creek and its tributary. Physical characteristics of the water body and condition of the water resource influence faunal composition of aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence aquatic communities. Fauna associated with the aquatic communities include various invertebrate and vertebrate species. Raccoon Creek is classified as a Robin-Warmouth stream, "supporting some fishing for bluegill and other sunfishes." Prey fish, including shiners (Notropis spp.), creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), and longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), provide foraging opportunities for redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auratus), bluegill (L. macrochirus) and warmouth (L. gulosus). Invertebrates that would be present include crayfish (family: Cambaridae), nymphal and larval stages of mayflies (Order: Ephemeroptera), and caddisflies (Order: Trichoptera). The bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frog (R. palustris), and northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon) are common permanent residents in this community. The tributary to Raccoon Creek will provide habitat for similar species of invertebrates that are found in Raccoon Creek. The substantially lower water flows in this tributary will preclude the presence of a significant fish population in this stream. However, juveniles of the Raccoon Creek fish population may find habitat and sanctuary in this tributary during high flow periods. C. Potential Impacts to Biotic Resources Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic resources described above. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to impact biological functions. The following discussion quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are considered here as well. 29 Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each community present within the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these communities. Table 8, below, summarizes potential quantitative losses to these biotic communities; resulting from project construction. Although the proposed right of way width for this project is 30 m (100 ft), the estimated impacts were derived using a maximum proposed right of way width of 36.5 m (120. ft) to account for permanent right of way plus possible temporary easements. Usually, project construction does not + require the entire right of way; therefore, actual impacts may be considerably less. TABLE 8 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO BIOTIC COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY IMPACTS Maintained 7.0 (17.2) Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.7 (1.8) TOTAL 7.7 (19.0) NOTE: Values cited are in hectares (acres). Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering habitat for various wildlife. Widening US 23B and its associated improvements will reduce habitat for faunal species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers. However, since the project area is dominated by disturbed habitats, it is anticipated that impacts to fauna will be minimal. Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become early successional habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the roadway while attracting other wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for the species. Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. Stream channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation, and erosion from construction-related work will affect water quality and biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts often associated with in-stream construction include increased channelization and scouring of the streambed in Raccoon Creek. In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove 30 streamside vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will produce siltation, which clogs the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-feeders), fish, and amphibian species. Benthic organisms can also be covered by excessive amounts of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a stream. The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction site alters the terrain. Alteration of the streambank enhances the likelihood of erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation carry soils, toxic compounds, and other materials into aquatic communities at the construction site. These processes magnify turbidity and can cause the formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, thereby' altering water flow and the growth of vegetation. Streamside alterations also lead to more direct sunlight penetration and to elevations of water temperatures which may impact many species. Stream impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project. These impacts are associated with the construction and extension of culverts and/or pipes. The details of stream involvement and modification will be detailed in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification, and compensatory mitigation with regard to stream mitigation is left to the discretion of DWQ. The NCDOT will coordinate with the DWQ to fulfill the necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. Methods to minimize these potential impacts are discussed in Section IV.D.I.d. d. Protected Species Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended [ESA]) requires that any action likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Other species may receive additional protection under separate state laws. 1. Federally Protected Species Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA. As of May 2, 1997, the USFWS lists seven federally-protected species for Haywood County (see Table 9). 31 • "E" denotes Endangered, a taxon which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. "T" denotes Threatened, a taxon which is likely to become and endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. "T S/A " denotes Proposed Threatened due to similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for protection.. TABLE 9 FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES FOR HAYWOOD COUNTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Alasmidonta raveneliana Appalachian elktoe E Clemmys muhlenbergii bog turtle T S/A Felis concolor couguar eastern cougar E Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Carolina northern flying squirrel E Gymnoderme lineare rock gnome lichen E Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle T Isotria medeoloides small-whorled pogonia E Alasmidonta raveneliana (Appalachian elktoe) E The Appalachian elktoe is a small mussel with a maximum length reaching up to 8.0 cm (3.2 inches). Although its shell is thin, it is not fragile, nor is it subovate (kidney-shaped). The periostracum (outer shell) of the adult Appalachian elktoe is dark brown in color, while juveniles have a yellowish-brown color. Three known populations of the Appalachian elktoe exist in North Carolina: the Nolichucky River (including its tributaries of the Cane River and the North Toe River); the Little Tennessee River and its tributaries; and the Tuckasegee River. The Appalachian elktoe has been observed in gravelly substrates often mixed with cobble and boulders, in cracks of bedrock, and in relatively silt-free, coarse sandy substrates. Extensive survey work in western North Carolina by the USFWS and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) indicates that the Appalachian elktoe is restricted to three populations, in the Little Tennessee River in Macon and Swain Counties, in the Tuskasegee River in Swain County, and in 32 the Nolichucky River basin in Yancey and Mitchell Counties. The Appalachian elktoe is not likely to be found outside of its current distribution area. The proposed project will not impact any water bodies within those areas. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Appalachian elktoe in the project vicinity. Therefore, it can be concluded that construction of this project will have no impact on the Appalachian elktoe mussel. a Clemmys muhlenbergii (bog turtle) T S/A The bog turtle is North Carolina's smallest turtle, measuring 7 to 10 cm (3 to 4 in.) in length. It has a dark brown carapace and a black plastron. The bright orange or tellow blotch on each side of the head and neck is a readily identifiable characteristic. The bog turtle inhabits damp grassy fields, bogs and marshes in the mountains and western Piedmont. The bog turtle is shy and secretive, and will burrow rapidly in mud or debris when disturbed. The bog turtle forages on insects, worms, snails, amphibians, and loose seed. In June or July, three to five eggs are laid in a shallow nest in moss or loose soil. The eggs hatch in about 55 days. The bog turtle is listed as Proposed Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T S/A). This is due to its similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for protection. T S/A species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; therefore, a biological conclusion is not required. Felis concolor cougar (eastern cougar) E Cougars are tawny colored with the exception of the muzzle, the backs of the ears, and the tip of the tail, which are black. In North Carolina the cougar is thought to occur in only a few scattered areas, possibly including coastal swamps and the southern Appalachian mountains. The eastern cougar is found in large remote wilderness areas where there is an abundance of their primary food source, white-tailed deer. A cougar will usually occupy a range of 40 square km (25 square miles) and they are most active at night. Suitable habitat in the form of large tracts of remote wilderness is not present in vicinity of the project area. The NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no 33 listing of the eastern cougar within the project vicinity; therefore, project construction will have no affect on the eastern cougar. Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus (Carolina northern flying squirrel) E The Carolina northern flying squirrel has a large well furred flap of skin along either side of its body. This furred flap of skin is connected at the wrist in the front and at the ankle in the rear. The skin flaps and its broad flattened tail allow the northern flying squirrel to glide from tree to tree. It is a solely nocturnal animal with large dark eyes. There are several isolated populations of the northern flying squirrel in the western part of North Carolina along the Tennessee border. This squirrel is found 1.5 km (0.95 mile) above mean sea level (MSL) in the vegetation transition zone between hardwood and coniferous forests. Both forest types are used to search for food, and the hardwood forest is used for nesting sites. Suitable habitat in the form of hardwood and coniferous forests does not exist within the project area. Project elevation is 0.8 km (0.5 mile) MSL, which is well below elevations where this species is normally found. Additionally, the NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the Carolina northern flying squirrel within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will have no affect on the Carolina northern flying squirrel. Gymnoderma lineare (Rock gnome lichen) E The rock gnome lichen is a squamulose lichen in the reindeer moss family. The lichen can be identified by its fruiting bodies which are born singly or in clusters, black in color, and are found at the tips of the squamules. The fruiting season of the rock gnome lichen occurs from July through September. The rock gnome lichen is a narrow endemic, restricted to areas of high humidity. These high humidity environments occur on high elevation (> 1.2 km/0.76 mile above MSL) mountaintops and cliff faces which are frequently bathed in fog or lower elevation (< 0.8 km /0.5 mile below MSL) deep gorges in the Southern Appalachians. The rock gnome lichen primarily occurs on vertical rock faces where seepage water from forest soils above 34 flows only at very wet times. The rock gnome lichen is almost always found growing with the moss Adreaea in these vertical intermittent seeps. The major threat of extinction to the rock gnome lichen relates directly to habitat alteration/loss of high elevation coniferous forests. These coniferous forests usually lie adjacent to the habitat occupied by the rock gnome lichen. The high elevation habitat occurs in the counties of Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Mitchell, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, and Yancey. The lower elevation habitat of the rock gnome lichen can be found in the counties of Jackson, Rutherford, and Transylvania. Suitable habitat in the form of high humidity areas, high elevation vertical rock faces, and deep gorges does not exist within the project study area. Additionally, the NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the rock gnome lichen within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the rock gnome lichen. Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) E Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail. The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight, bald eagles can be identified by their flat wing soar. Eagle nests are found in proximity to water (within 0.8 km [0.5 mile]) with a clear flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion. Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees away from human disturbance does not exist within the project area. Bald eagles may find foraging opportunities in Lake Junaluska; however, project construction will not interrupt potential foraging activities in this water body. The NCNHP data base of rare species and unique habitats contains no listing of the bald eagle in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle. • 35 • Isotria medeoloides (small-whorled pogonia) E Small-whorled pogonia is a perennial orchid having long hairy roots and a hollow stem. Stems terminate in a whorl of five or six light green, elliptical leaves that are somewhat pointed. One or two light green flowers are produced at the end of the stem. Flowers of small-whorled pogonia have short sepals. The small-whorled pogonia grows in "second growth deciduous" or deciduous-coniferous forests with an open canopy, open shrub layer, and sparse herb layer. It prefers acidic soils. Flowering is inhibited in areas where there is relatively high shrub coverage or high sapling density. The remnant mixed hardwood forests within the project area contain very dense shrub and vine layers. Very little herbaceous vegetation was present in this forest community. Subsequently, no small-whorled pogonia habitat was observed during the field surveys which were conducted by NCDOT staff biologists Bruce Ellis and Logan Williams on May 28, 1996. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database of rare species and unique habitats revealed no listing of small-whorled pogonia within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not affect the small-whorled pogonia. 2. Federal Species of Concern and State-L.isted Species There are 31 Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Haywood County. Federal Species of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the ESA and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Species of Concern are defined as those species which may or may not be listed in the future. These species were formally candidate species, or species under consideration for listing for which there was insufficient information to support a listing of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Significantly Rare (SR), or Special Concern (SC) by the NCNHP list of rare plant and animal species are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. Table 10 lists Federal Species of Concern and State-listed species, the species state status, and the existence of suitable 36 habitat for each species in the study area. This species list is provided for information purposes as.the status of these species may be upgraded in the future. Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were any of these species observed. A review of the NCNHP data base of the rare species and unique habitats revealed no records of North Carolina rare and/or protected species in or • near the project study area. 37 • V 11 TABLE 10 FED*AL SPECIES OF CONCERN AND STATE-LISTED SPECIES FOR HAYWOOD COUNTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT Abies fraseri Buckleya disticophylla Cardamine clematitis Carex manhartii Clemmys muhlenbergi Contopus borealis Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Delphinium exaltatum Dendroica cerulea Eulochus marialiciae Euphorbia purpurea Glyceria nubigena Fraser fir Piratebush Mountain bittercress Manhart's sedge Bog turtle Olive-sided fly catcher Hellbender Tall larkspur Cerulean warbler Mary Alice's Small-headed fly Glade spurge Smokey Mountain manna grass Butternut Mount LeConte moss Fraser's loosestrife C E C C T SC SC E-SC SR SR C NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO Juglands cinerea Leptohymenium sharpii Lysimachia fraseri Microtus chrotorrhinus carol inensis Neotomafloridana haematoreia Neotoma magister Phyciodes batesii Plagiochila caduciloba Plagiochila sharpii Plagiochila sullivanatii var. sullivantii Rugelia nudicaulis Saxifraga caroliniana Silene ovata Sorex palustris punctulatus Spenolobopsis pearsonii Speyeria diana Sylvilagus obscurus Thryomanes bewickii altus Trillium Pusillum var. 1 T W5' C E NO NO NO YES Southern rock vole SC NO Southern Appalachian woodrat SC NO Alleghany woodrat SC NO Tawny crescent butterfly SR NO A liverwort E NO A liverwort C NO A liverwort C NO Rugel's ragwort T NO Carolina saxifrage E NO Mountain catchfly C NO Southern water shrew SC NO A liverwort C NO Diana fritillary butterfly SR NO Appalachian cottontail SR NO Appalachian Bewick's wren E NO Alabama least trillium E NO - Watch List 38 2. Water Resources Waters in the project vicinity are part of the French Broad River Basin. The French Broad River Basin in North Carolina consists of three major river systems that include the French Broad, Pigeon, and Nolichucky Rivers. The French Broad River occupies a central position within the basin. The three rivers flow in a northwesterly direction and eventually converge in Tennessee. Waters within the project area are located in sub basin 04-03-05 of the French Broad River basin. Project area waters drain to the northwest and eventually empty into the Pigeon River. The Pigeon River is the western most river system of the French Broad River basin. The major water resource within the project area is Raccoon Creek. US 23B crosses over Raccoon Creek approximately 1.6 km (1.0 mile) north of the southern terminus of the project (see Figures 1, 2, and 7). Raccoon Creek then flows in a northwesterly direction until it converges with Richland Creek, 760 in (2500 ft) downstream of US 23B. Richland Creek continues in a northerly direction until it empties into Lake Junaluska approximately 760 in (2500 ft) downstream of the confluence of Raccoon and Richland Creeks. Richland Creek reforms downstream of the Lake Junaluska dam and eventually joins with the Pigeon River 3.2 km (2.0 mile) further north. Raccoon Creek, at US 23B, is 4.6 in (15.0 ft) wide and has an average depth of 0.3 m (1.0 ft). The substrate is composed of boulder, rubble, gravel, and sand. Water clarity was excellent. No submersed aquatic vegetation was observed. One other stream crossing was observed during the site investigation. This is a small perennial unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The stream is located approximately 610 in (2000 ft) north of where US 23B crosses over Raccoon Creek. The stream is 0.8 m (2.5 ft) wide, 2.5 cm (1.0 in) in depth, and has a substrate composed of sand and silt. Water flow was very low and no aquatic vegetation was observed. Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The classification of Raccoon Creek and its unnamed tributary (index no. 5-16-14) is B. The B classification denotes freshwaters protected for primary recreation which includes swimming on a frequent or organized basis and all Class C uses. Class C uses include aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. • 11 Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I, or ' undeveloped watersheds, or WS-II; predominately undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mile) of the project area. 39 • The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by the DWQ (formerly the Division of Environmental Management) and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water quality. The program assesses water quality by sampling for benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Many Benthic macroinvertebrates have stages in their life cycle that can last from six months to a year; therefore, the adverse effects of a toxic spill will not be overcome until the next generation. Different taxa of macroinvertebrates have different tolerances to pollution, thereby, long term changes in water quality conditions can be identified by population shifts from pollution sensitive to pollution tolerant organisms (and vice versa). Overall, the species present, the population diversity, and the biomass are reflections of long term water quality conditions. No BMAN stations are situated on Raccoon Creek; however, a BMAN station is located within the project vicinity on Richland Creek at SR 1188. Since the BMAN station on Richland Creek is approximately 365 m (1200 ft) west of the project area, water quality results from this station will provide some insight to water quality conditions within the project vicinity. Richland Creek has been sampled on four occasions since 1983. The resulting bioclassifications from these sampling events are: 1983/Poor, 1985 and 1988/Fair, and 1992/Good-Fair (DWQ, 1994). DWQ indicates that, historically, water quality concerns in Richland Creek have been substantial, however, the positive changes in water quality conditions reflect improvements made by manufacturing/industrial facilities within the basin (DWQ, 1994). The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake, and estuarine water quality monitoring stations strategically located for the collection of physical and chemical water quality data. The sample frequency and type of water quality data or parameters that are collected are determined by the waterbody's freshwater or saltwater classification and corresponding water quality standards (DWQ, 1995). An AMS is located on Richland Creek at SR 1188 (Medford Road). Water quality monitoring results from this station reveal that water quality criteria were exceeded at least once for the following parameters: fecal coliform, turbidity, copper, iron, mercury, and zinc (DWQ, 1994). Lake Junaluska, is a 81-hectare (200-acre) lake, located 1.4 km (0.9 mile) downstream of the project area. Lake Junaluska is monitored as part of the DWQ Lakes Assessment Program. DWQ (1994) reports that Lake Junaluska "has had problems with sedimentation and eutrophication." As a result of sedimentation, the lake has needed to be dredged about once every ten years since 1964 (DWQ, 1994). Sources of sedimentation, as reported by the DWQ, include highway construction and residential and industrial growth within the Lake Junaluska watershed. 40 Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is required to register for a permit. No point source dischargers are listed for Raccoon Creek or its unnamed tributary. However, Richland Creek contains several point source dischargers. Champion International Corporation, within the project vicinity, is permitted to discharge 5700 cubic meters (1.5 million gallons per day) of non-contact cooling water and condensate into Richland Creek. The outfall is located approximately 0.5 km (0.3 mile) upstream of the confluence of Richland and Raccoon Creeks. Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater or snowmelt. In urban areas, high concentrations of impervious surfaces greatly increases runoff rates and volumes. Stormwater collection systems then transport runoff waters quickly to receiving streams with little or no filtering by vegetated surfaces. Contaminants originating from urban development include: lawn care products, such as, pesticides and fertilizers; automobile-related pollutants that include lubricants, abraded tire and brake linings; lawn and household wastes; and fecal coliform bacteria from animals and failing septic systems. The high velocity and volumes of runoff can also cause increased erosion of stream channels through physical scouring of the stream banks and floodplain. As indicated by the DWQ (1994), the water quality within the project vicinity has been adversely affected by urban and industrial development. Recent water quality monitoring data suggests that water quality is improving, largely through improvements made by industry. Within the project vicinity, Richland Creek and Lake Junaluska are the water resources that have received the most impact. The Raccoon Creek watershed has received impacts from residential and commercial development; however, it has not been subject to industrial development and its associated water quality impacts. Construction of the proposed project will impact water resources by one or more of the following processes: roadway widening, box culvert and/or pipe construction, and box culvert and pipe extension. Construction activities are likely to alter and/or interrupt stream flows and water levels at each aquatic site. This disruption of the stream reduces stream flow downstream of the project. Temporary diversions of water flow will raise the water level upstream from the project and lower the water level downstream of the project. Estimated linear impacts are derived using entire maximum proposed right-of-way widths. Construction of the new culvert proposed for Raccoon Creek will necessitate approximately 40 m (133 ft) of stream impacts due to culvert replacement and result in approximately 100 m (330 ft) of stream rechannelization. For streams which will be impacted by channelization and/or relocation, these stream banks will be re-vegetated. The NCDOT will coordinate 41 with the NCWRC and the USFWS to fulfill the necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. Additionally, approximately 10 m (33 ft) of the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek will be impacted as a result of pipe extension. No rechannelization of this tributary is anticipated. Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters: • 1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion. 2. Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and vegetation removal. 3. Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface and ground water flow from construction. 4. Changes in water temperature due to vegetation removal. 5. Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas. 6. Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction, toxic spills, and increased vehicular use. To minimize surface water impacts, the proposed project will include: Consideration of decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of right-of-way widths and fill slopes. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. Although the NCDOT has reduced impacts to surface waters along US 23B by decreasing the berm width from to 3.0 meters (10 feet) to 2.4 meters (8 feet), additional precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area. The NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surfacd waters will be strictly enforced during the 42 construction stage of the project. Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during the construction interval will also be strictly enforced. 3. Jurisdictional Wetlands and Surface Waters Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual." The three parameter approach is used where hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be present for an area to be considered a wetland. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area; however, jurisdictional surface waters are present. a. Permit Requirements Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project study area. This permit authorizes construction provided the following conditions are met: 1. the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual crossing; 2. the fill placed in Water of the United States is limited to a filled area of no more than 0.1 hectares (1/3 acre); 3. no more than a total of 61 in (200 linear ft) of the fill for the roadway can occur in special aquatic sites, including wetlands; 4. the crossing is culverted, bridged, or otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and movement of aquatic organisms; and 43 5. the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of "Waters of the United States." North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 Water Quality General Certification is required prior to the issuance of the Section 404 Nationwide 14. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or other land manipulations. t The authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon the concurrence of NCWRC. The proposed project is located in a designated "trout" county. A letter of comment has been obtained by NCWRC concerning the proposed project for the crossing of Raccoon Creek and the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek (see Appendix A, pages A-23 and A-24). The NCWRC states that trout do not occur at these sites and they are unaware of any other special concerns regarding the project. b. Wetland Mitia tion The COE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of "Waters of the United States." Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially. 1. Avoidance Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to wetlands and surface waters. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes. 44 The purpose and need of the proposed project cannot be met without impacting "Waters of the United States." Avoidance of these waters is not a practicable alternative because of the terrain features associated with the location of the project corridor. 2. Minimization Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce adverse impacts. Implementation of these steps will be required through project modifications and permit conditions. Practicable means to minimize impacts to surface waters impacted by the proposed project include: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. 3. Compensatory Mitigation Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to wetlands and surface waters have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is recognized that "no net loss" of wetlands and surface water functions and values may not be achieved in each and every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been required. Compensatory actions often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of wetlands. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site. No jurisdictional wetlands will be affected by this project, and no compensatory mitigation is proposed in conjunction with this project. 45 4. &ils The project study area lies within the Mountain Physiographic Province. The topography within the project region is characterized by mountainous areas frequently dissected by streams. The project area is situated in a small valley where Raccoon Creek has formed a moderately sized alluvial plain. Elevations within the project area vary slightly, averaging approximately 790 m (2600 ft) above mean sea level (MSL). Higher hilltops within the project vicinity average 884 m (2900 ft) in elevation. Five soil map units occur within project boundaries: Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, Dillsboro-Urban land complex, Udorthents, Evard-Cowee-Urban land complex, and Hayesville-Urban land complex. The Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex is associated with the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek and is the only undisturbed soil unit within the project area. The other four units are soils that have been disturbed from excavation or by urban development. Table 11 lists study area soils in the order of relative dominance. TABLE 11 SOILS WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA MAPPING SOIL PERCENT DRAINAGE HYDRIC UNIT SLOPE CLASS CLASS CxA Cullowhee-Nikwasi somewhat Complex 0-2 poorly hydric' & poorly DuC Dillsboro Urban Land Complex 2-15 wellz non hydric Ud Udorthents, loamy not applicable variable non hydric ExD Evard-Cowee-Urban Land Complex 15-30 well non hydric HeC Hayesville-Urban Land Complex 2-15 we112 non hydric A modern soil survey for Haywood County is currently not available. Soil information was provided by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) of Haywood County. Drainage Class for the soil in its undisturbed state. Classified as Hydric due to the Nikwasi (listed as hydric) portion of this map unit, frequently flooded. The Cullowhee-Nikawasi complex is confined to the alluvial plain of Raccoon Creek and occupies the central portion of the project area. However, most of the area occupied by this soil is used as pasture or in hay production. This map unit typically contains approximately 50 percent Cullowhee soils and 35 percent Nikawasi soils. Cullowhee soils (sandy loam) are closer to 46 the stream channel where they are associated with natural levees and are higher on the landscape than the Nikwasi (loamy) soils. The Nikwasi soils are present in narrow floodplains, and this soil unit is listed as hydric. Flooding and wetness are the main use limitations for this soil complex. Udorthents consists of soils where the natural soil layering sequence has been destroyed by earth moving machines. The disturbance is such that the original soil series is no longer identifiable. Soil characteristics, jsuch as drainage class, slope, and productivity, are no longer applicable. Udorthents are present in the northern portion of the study area where significant soil disturbance associated with roadway construction and commercial and urban development have occurred. The remaining map units are soil complexes that contain urban land. Urban land is described by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) (formerly the U. S. Soil Conservation Service) as soils that are "covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, railroad yards and airports." The natural soils were greatly altered by cutting, filling, grading, and shaping during the process of urbanization. The original landscape, topography, and commonly the drainage pattern have been changed." Due to the presence of impermeable surfaces, surface runoff is high and erosion is a hazard with unprotected soils. Generally, urban land comprises 20 to 35 percent of these soil complexes. The higher densities of residential and urban development in proximity to the roadway suggest that urban land is present in a proportionally higher percentage in this area. Soil core samples taken throughout the project area revealed soils with a silty texture. The soils did not exhibit hydric characteristics, such as sulfidic odor, gleyed or low chroma colors, or mottling. Therefore, hydric soil indicators, as defined in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual," 1987, were not observed within the project study area. Both Haywood County and the Town of Waynesville participate in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. The Raccoon Creek site is in a flood hazard zone and is included in a detailed flood study. A floodplain map, which delineates the established limits of the 100-year floodplain and floodway in the project vicinity, is included in Figure 6. There are no buildings in the project vicinity with floor elevations below the 100-year flood level. The backwater from the proposed culvert at Raccoon Creek will be significantly reduced, compared to that of the existing culvert, and will not have an adverse impact on the existing floodplain nor on associated flood hazards. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable. Groundwater resources will be assessed in final design to insure that measures are taken, if necessary, to avoid groundwater 47 contamination. The NCDOT will coordinate with the USCOE and the NCWRC in final hydraulics design to insure that any environmental concerns are appropriately addressed, and with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations in this area. • 6. Noise Analysis An analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed widening of US 23B from Marshall Street to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) in Haywood County on noise levels in the immediate project area. This investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land uses and a field survey of ambient (existing) noise levels in the study area. It also includes a comparison of the predicted noise levels and the ambient noise levels to determine if traffic noise impacts can bei expected resulting from the proposed project. Traffic noise impacts are determined from the current procedures for the abatement of highway traffic noise and construction noise, appearing as Part 772 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered. a. Characteristics of Noise Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted from many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power generation plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic noise, is usually a composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive train, and tire-roadway interaction. The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure. Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is used to relate sound pressures to some common reference level, usually the decibel (dB). Sound pressures described in decibels are called sound pressure levels and are often defined in terms of frequency weighted scales (A, B, C, or D). The weighted-A decibel scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle noise measurements because it places the most emphasis on the frequency range to which the human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound levels measured using a weighted-A decibel scale are often expressed as dBA. Throughout this report, all noise levels will be expressed in dBA's. Several examples of noise pressure levels in dBA are listed in Table N 1 (see Appendix C, Page C-1). 48 Review of Table N1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or annoyance of unwanted sound depends essentially on three things: 1. The amount and nature of the intruding noise. 2. The relationship between the background noise and the intruding noise. 3. The type of activity occurring when the noise is heard. In considering the first of these three factors, it is important to note that individuals have different sensitivity to noise. Loud noises bother some more than others and some individuals become upset if an unwanted noise persists. The time patterns of noise also enter into an individual's judgment of whether or not a noise is offensive. For example, noises occurring during sleeping hours are usually considered to be more offensive than the same noises in the daytime. With regard to the second factor, individuals tend to judge the annoyance of an unwanted noise in terms of its relationship to noise from other sources (background noise). The blowing of a car horn at night when background noise levels are approximately 45 dBA would generally be more objectionable than the blowing of a car horn in the afternoon when background noises might be 55 dBA. The third factor is related to the interference of noise with activities of individuals. In a 60 dBA environment, normal conversation would be possible while sleep might be difficult. Work activities requiring high levels of concentration may be interrupted by loud noises while activities requiring manual effort may not be interrupted to the same degree. Over time, particularly if the noises occur at predicted intervals and are expected, individuals tend to accept the noises which intrude into their lives. Attempts have been made to regulate many of these types of noises including airplane noise, factory noise, railroad noise, and highway traffic noise. In relation to highway traffic noise, methods of analysis and control have developed rapidly over the past few years. b. Noise Abatement Criteria In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are not compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria (NAC) and procedures to be used in the planning and design of highways. These abatement criteria and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned Federal reference (Title 49 23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for various land uses is presented in Table N2 (see Appendix C, page C-2). The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is the level of constant sound which, in a given situation and time period, has the same energy as does time varying sound. In other words, the fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are represented in terms of a steady noise level with the same energy content. s C. Ambient Noise Levels t Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the project to determine the existing background noise levels. The purpose of this noise level information was to quantify the existing acoustic environment and to provide a base for assessing the impact of noise level increases. The existing Leq noise levels along US 23B as measured at 15 meters (50 feet) from the roadway ranged from 68 to 65 dBA. The ambient measurement sites and measured exterior Leq noise levels are presented in Table N3 (see Appendix C page C-3). The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the most current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing noise levels for comparison with noise levels actually measured. The calculated existing noise levels ranged up to +2.7 dBA (average +1.1 dBA) of the measured noise levels for the locations where noise measurements were obtained. Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching" of vehicles, low traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds versus the computer's "evenly-spaced" vehicles and single vehicular speed. d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large number of variables which describe different cars driving at different speeds through a continual changing highway configuration and surrounding terrain. Due to the complexity of the problem, certain assumptions and simplifications must be made to predict highway traffic noise. The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study was the Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA (revised March, 1983). The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA- RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model uses the number and type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds, the physical characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed, elevated, etc.), receptor location and height, and, if applicable, barrier type, barrier ground elevation, and barrier top elevation. 50 In this regard, it is to be noted that only preliminary alignment was available for use in this noise analysis. This project proposes to widen US 23B to a five-lane curb and gutter section with some minor horizontal alignment improvements. Only those existing natural or man-made barriers were included in setting up the model. The roadway sections and proposed intersections were assumed to be flat and at-grade. Thus, this analysis represents the "worst-case" topographical conditions. The noise predictions made in this report are highway-related noise predictions for 40 the traffic conditions during the year being analyzed. Peak hour design and level-of-service (LOS) C volumes were compared, and the volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were used with the anticipated posted speed limits. Hence, during all other time periods, the noise levels will be no greater than those indicated in this report. The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized in order to determine the number of land uses (by type) which would be impacted during the peak hour of the design year 2017. A land use is considered to be impacted when exposed to noise levels approaching or exceeding the FHWA noise abatement criteria and/or predicted to sustain a substantial noise increase. The basic approach was to select receptor locations such as 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 meters from the center of the near traffic lane (adaptable to both sides of the roadway). The locations of these receptors were determined by the changes in projected traffic volumes and/or the posted speed limits along the proposed project. The result of this procedure was a grid of receptor points along the project. Using this grid, noise levels were calculated for each identified receptor. The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are listed in Table N4 (see Appendix C, pages C-4 through C-6). Information included in this table consists of listings of all receptors in proximity to the project, their ambient and predicted noise levels, and the estimated noise level increase for each. e. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels either: [a] approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria (with "approach" meaning within 1 dBA of the Table N2 value), or [b] substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The NCDOT definition of substantial increase is shown in the lower portion of Table N2. Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to receptors which fall in either category. t 51 In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the federal and/or state governments are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of the location of a proposed highway project will be the approval date of the s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document or actions, such as a Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, Record of Decision, or the Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For • development occurring after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are responsible to insure that noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility. The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that are predicted to become impacted by future traffic noise is shown in Table N5 (see Appendix C, page C-7). These are noted in terms of those receptors expected to experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC or by a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. Under Title 23 CFR Part 772, there are 26 residential receptors which are anticipated to approach or exceed the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours as a result of to highway traffic noise in the project area. The maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours are less than 20 and 38 meters (67 and 127 feet), respectively, from the center of the proposed roadway. This information should assist local authorities in exercising land use control over the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local jurisdiction. For example, with the proper information on noise, the local authorities can prevent further development of incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels of an adjacent highway. Table N6 (see Appendix C, page C-8) indicates the exterior traffic noise level increases for the identified receptors in each roadway section. No receptor is expected to experience a substantial increase (considered to be 10 dBA, since existing noise levels are greater than 50 dBA) in their exterior noise level. The predicted noise level increases are from +1 to +9 dBA. The larger traffic noise increases are in the areas where the improvements to the horizontal alignment are anticipated. When real-life noises are heard, it is possible barely to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more readily noticeable. A 10 dBA change is judged by most people as a doubling or a halving of the loudness of the sound. If traffic noise impacts are predicted for buildings with permits issued before the Date of Public Knowledge, noise abatement measures to reduce or eliminate these noise impacts must be considered. 52 f. Highway Noise Abatement 1. Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or vertical orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of alternative alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance between noise impacts and other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise abatement, horizontal alignment selection is primarily a matter of siting the roadway at a sufficient distance from noise sensitive areas to minimize noise impacts to those areas. However, the proposed alignment was determined based on minimizing overall environmental impacts and primarily involves widening of the existing roadway; therefore, opportunities for possible shifts in the roadway's alignment are limited. It is anticipated that no substantial increase in noise impacts will result from the implementation of either of the studied alternates. Therefore, changing the horizontal alignment was not considered as a practical noise abatement measure. 2. Traffic management measures which limit vehicle type, speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise abatement measures. For this project, traffic management measures are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due to their effect on the capacity and level of service on the proposed roadway. For example, lowering the traffic speed on the roadway would reduce noise impacts to the area; however, the resulting capacity and level of service for the roadway would decrease. Therefore, no traffic management measures were considered for noise abatement. 3. Noise Barriers Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can often be applied with a measurable degree of success by the application of solid mass, attenuable measures to effectively diffract, absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise emissions. Solid mass, attenuable measures may include earth berms or artificial abatement walls. 53 The project will maintain no control of access, meaning most commercial establishments and residences will have direct access connections to the proposed roadway, and all intersections will adjoin the project at grade. For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it * must be high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from significant sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then t becomes economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise reduction. Safety at access openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight distance is also a concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction (at least 5 dBA's, but preferably 8 dBA's), a barrier's length would normally be eight (8) times the distance from the barrier to the receptor. For example, a receptor located 15 meters (49.2 ft) from the barrier would normally require a barrier 120 meters (393.6 ft) long to provide sufficient noise reduction. An access opening of 12 meters (39.4 ft) (10 percent of the area) would limit its noise reduction to approximately 4 dBA (FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI-HEV-73-7976-1, USDOT, Chapter 5, Section 3.2, pages 5-27). In addition, businesses, churches, and other related establishments located along a particular highway normally require accessibility and high visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures for traffic noise abatement would tend to disallow these two qualities, and thus, would not be acceptable abatement measures in this case. Therefore, no noise barriers are proposed in conjunction with this project. g. "Do-Nothing" Alternative The traffic noise impacts for the "do nothing" or "no-build" alternative were also considered. If the proposed widening did not occur, six residences would experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA's NAC. Also, the receptors could anticipate experiencing an increase in exterior noise levels in the range of +2 to +3 dBA. As previously noted, it is barely possible to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. 54 h. Construction Noise The major construction elements of this project are expected to be earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passers-by and those individuals living or working near the project, can be expected particularly from paving operations and from the earth moving equipment during R grading operations. However, considering the relatively short-term nature of construction noise, these impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss characteristics of nearby natural elements and man- made structures are believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive construction noise. Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not recommended, and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This evaluation completes the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23 CFR, Part 772, and unless a major project change develops, no additional reports are required for this project. 7. Air Quality Analysis Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from industrial and internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources. Other origins of common outdoor air pollution are solid waste disposal and any form of fire. The impact resulting from highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air pollution problems to improving the ambient air conditions. The traffic is the center of concern when determining the impact of a new highway facility or the improvement of an old highway facility. Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead (Pb) (listed in order of decreasing emission rate). Automobiles are considered to be the major source of CO in the project area. For this reason, most of the analysis presented is concerned with determining expected carbon monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic flow. In order to determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor closest to the highway project, two concentration components must be used: local and background. The local concentration is defined as the CO emissions from cars operating on highways in the near vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters [330 feet]) of the receptor location. The background concentration is defined by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) as the concentration of a pollutant at a point that is the result of emissions outside the local vicinity; that is, the concentration at the upwind edge of the local sources." 55 In this study, the local concentration was determined by the NCDOT Traffic Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer modeling and the background concentration was obtained from the NCDEHNR. Once the two concentration components were resolved, they were added together to determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor in question and to compare to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrogen oxides (NO). Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried into the atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Automotive emissions of HC and NO are expected to decrease in the future due to the continued installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new cars. However, regarding area-wide emissions, these technological improvements may be offset by the increasing number of cars on the transportation facilities of the area. The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide require several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone generally occur 10 to 20 kilometers (6.3 to 12.5 miles) downwind of the source of hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas as a whole are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons, not individual streets and highways. The emissions of all sources in an urban area mix together in the atmosphere, and in the presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to form ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and other photochemical oxidants. The best example of this type of air pollution is the smog which forms in Los Angeles, California. Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less than seven (7) percent of particulate matter emissions and less than two (2) percent of sulfur dioxide emissions. Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the result of non-highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural). Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from automobiles are very low, there is no reason to suspect that traffic on the project will cause air quality standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded. Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular gasoline. The burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline containing tetraethyl lead which is added by refineries to increase the octane rating of the fuel. Newer cars with catalytic converters burn unleaded gasoline eliminating lead emissions. Also, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the reduction in the lead content of leaded gasolines. The overall average lead content of gasoline in 1974 was 0.53 gram per liter. By 1989, this composite average had dropped to 0.0035 gram per liter. In the future, lead emissions are expected to decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the lead 56 content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 made the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead additives unlawful after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is not expected that traffic on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for lead to be exceeded. A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future CO concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements. "CAL3QHC - A Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant Concentrations Near • Roadway Intersections" was used to predict the CO concentration for each of the sensitive receptors to the project. 10 Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO concentrations consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with predicted traffic volumes, vehicle emission factors, and worst-case meteorological parameters. The traffic volumes are based on the annual average daily traffic projections. The traffic volume used for the CAL3QHC model was the highest volume within the project limits. Carbon monoxide vehicle emission factors were calculated for the years of 1997 and 2017 using the EPA publication "Mobile Source Emission Factors" and the MOBILE5A mobile source emissions computer model. The background CO concentration for the project area was estimated to be 1.8 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient CO concentration of 1.8 ppm is suitable for most suburban/rural areas. The air quality receptor for the build alternative is located on the right-of- way at a distance of 15.2 meters (50 feet) from the proposed centerline. The air quality receptor for the no-build alternative is located on the right-of-way at a distance of 9.1 meters (30 feet) from the existing centerline. The predicted one- hour CO concentrations for the build and no-build alternatives for the completion and design years of 1997 and 2017 are shown in Table 12, below. ONE-HOUR CO TABLE 12 CONCENTRATIONS (IN PARTS PER MILLION) RECEPTOR 1997 2017 BUILD 3.1 3.4 NO-BUILD 3.9 11.3 Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS (maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging period = 9 ppm) indicates no violation of these standards. Since the results of the worst-case 1-hour CO analysis for the build alternative is less than 9 ppm, it can be concluded that the 8-hour CO level does not exceed the standard. See Tables 57 Al through A4 in Appendix C (pages C-9 through C-12) for input data and output. The project is located in Haywood County, which has been determined to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Because the project is located in an attainment area, 40 CFR Part 51 is not applicable. This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area. During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be removed from the project, burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan for Air Quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Care will be taken to insure that burning will be done at the greatest practical distance from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will only be utilized under constant surveillance. Also during construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust generated by construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection and comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for air quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, and no additional reports are necessary. A reconnaissance survey of the project corridor identified two sites which have the potential to contain underground storage tanks (UST). A records search of the DEM/Groundwater Section was conducted, and the information is provided in Appendix B. Both sites are located in the immediate project vicinity. Based on the preliminary site assessment, this project is not anticipated to impact any UST's. 9. Farmland The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction on prime and important farmland soils. Land which has been developed, or is committed to development, is exempt from the requirements of the Act. The project is located in an area zoned or planned for future urban development. Therefore, no further consideration of potential farmland impacts is required. 58 10. Construction Impacts To minimize potential effects caused by construction, the following measures, along with those already mentioned, will be enforced during the construction phase: a. All possible measures will be taken to insure that the public's health and safety will not be compromised during the movement of any materials to and from construction sites along the project and that any inconveniences imposed on the public will be kept to a minimum. b. Dust control will be exercised at all times to prevent endangering the safety and general welfare of the public and to prevent diminishing the value, utility, or appearance of any public or private properties. C. The contractor shall be required to observe and comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees, including those of the N. C. State Board of Health regarding the disposal of solid waste. All solid waste will be disposed of in accordance with the Standard Specifications of the Division of Highways. These specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Solid Waste Vector Control Section of the Division of Health Services, N. C. Department of Human Resources. d. Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas outside of the right of way and provided by the contractor, unless otherwise required by the plans or special provisions or unless disposal within the right of way is permitted by the Resident Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active public waste or disposal areas will not be permitted without prior approval by the Resident Engineer. Such approval will not be permitted when, in the opinion of the Resident Engineer, it will result in excessive siltation or pollution. C. The construction of the project is not expected to cause any serious disruptions in service to any of the utilities serving the area. Before construction is started, a preconstruction conference involving the contractor, pertinent local officials, and the Division of Highways will be held to discuss various steps to be taken during the time of construction that will minimize interruption of service. f. Prior to construction, a determination will be made regarding the need to relocate or adjust any existing utilities in the project area. A determination of whether NCDOT or the utility owner will be responsible for this work will be made at that time. 59 g. During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be disposed of by the contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan for Air Quality. Care will be taken to insure burning will be done at the greatest distance practicable from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will be performed under constant surveillance. The clearing of highway right of way and timber disposal is r the responsibility of the contractor. The NCDOT's general contract for right-of-way clearing provides the opportunity for the contractor to market merchantable timber to minimize the need for piling and burning during construction. This contract also includes specifications to protect trees outside the construction limits. All timber cut during the clearing operations is the property of the contractor and shall be either removed from the project by the contractor or disposed of satisfactorily. h. The contractor will be required to perform erosion control in accordance with the project erosion constrol plans, contract, standards, and/or Standard Specifications or as requested by the Resident Engineer. These contract documents are in accordance with the erosion constrol measures outlined in the Department of Transportation's FHPM 6-7-3-1. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed and maintained in accordance with the plans. Additional measures to control erosion throughout the project will be added as necessary. i. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for use on this project, the contractor shall obtain certification from the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources that the removal of material from the borrow source will have no effect on any known district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification shall be furnished to the Resident Engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed borrow source. j. Traffic service in the immediate project area may be subjected to brief disruption during construction of the project. Every effort will be made to insure that the transportation needs of the public will be met both during and after construction. 60 V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS This project has been coordinated with the following federal, state, and local, agencies. Comments were received from the agencies marked by an asterisk (*). Advisory Council on Historic Preservation U. S. Army Corps of Engineers * U. S. Department of the Interior * Fish and Wildlife Service U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Tennessee Valley Authority N. C. Department of Cultural Resources N. C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources * Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs * Division of Environmental Management (Division of Water Quality) * Division of Solid Waste Management * Division of Land Resources N. C. Department of Human Resources N. C. Department of Public Instruction N. C. Geological Survey N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission Haywood County Board of Commissioners Haywood County Planning Department Town of Waynesville A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on May 8, 1996 at the Lake Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria in Waynesville, North Carolina. Including NCDOT representatives, 73 persons attended the meeting. A copy of the press release advertising the workshop and a copy of the handout made available at the meeting are included in Appendix E (see pages E-1 through E-7). This Environmental Assessment will be provided to appropriate federal, state, and local agencies for comment. NCDOT will coordinate with pertinent agencies regarding substantive issues raised as a result of their review. Responses to comments and project- related commitments will be incorporated into subsequent documentation for this project. A public hearing will be held following the completion of this Environmental Assessment to provide more detailed information to local citizens and to receive additional comments regarding the proposed project. R-2210 A FIGURES 46 • • • St«hn. " - ? ? ?. ?. i\. ulm dlv ?l PARK C qtM 16ti ` CrtDtret' A ' 0, 0 D-A tna 17 lma 400, ' 19 V Iltr ,R ,. tw II. i. ?Clydt' I ?.. )Y?I Sn I NI?Orod •/ :J sw.A, #00 . j P11 `A AM .. ` 40 6-- Cc" w S, gn 17E '•/ It NAT 1 ? 1 ? 1 HA YWOOD COUNTY N WAYNESULLE QUAD tµ 1171 1 y » 1 _ r° 01>a 11 1 ??AK \?? iax Iffy B fl I lm Br?nrh 1 UA.A?U.r4 - ,?,?.?Iq, 711 - \ It 0 Y1 Ilf7 )t ,,4 ml lim ?, U97 -IN o+ it 1 9 ?/ END mt_ oti PROJECT -e u? ,° ? BEGIN ?.? ?'?- PROJECT RIV.. / .tom 0%WAYNESVILLE rov. 6,743 S I .1 lur 1t.C 0001 latl L? U9i. )Lr yr/ r4 Illl "sob.* NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 1e O1°? TRANSPORTATION 1>? ° DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS a rAS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 1 r° aT os,/o BRANCH au US 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) an lw FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSHALL STREET/WOODLAND DRIVE) TO s; SOUTH OF SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD) ' 1D1 NEAR WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 A ILI, ? 0 KILOMETERS 0.1 0 MILES °'° FIG. 1 WAYNESVILLE S"Ino PO OO RO F.An.f<: •1I,lIVT'.,l. Mi+?IQ IA ° 209 `? _ `?.\ W Q \ap6 on bc SR 1206 ' I,AK 1 OI RED°. cRFSrq/o 23 N / o ` \ \ \ \Tr ,APO/ / JULE MELAND RD 1 S? O /r Q _ °pK?N aP,''?y \ \\ ? ? aP\M1?PJ??y 1I \ / (J//? gtioA i I ? I I I W ? I` v r? \ I \ ` q l¢ ; A^ LO°oy p, I;PER OR o I K°P,?s - I ¢/O yp ? -?. URCELL N\G .I ` ?•Ug? 9 /cL Z3) 19 p°:?`` \/ CND ?\ \- r ? ?`? I PROJECT puREL 06 N "91 Ik GO, // // •••• ?• \ t\P-?KPm? NOL'tO?i??PO y0;???`? . 0 04, ?• ?` 16 1-? ?• __ 990 t ?• I? / / I-/? (,23 • '. • •? • • RAYTOWN ? ? ¦ \ HTOS 276 •••• /`?`;`? \ b . 74 qD > I? \ q ? ? O I H • WpYN \•7 ?? .?" z? m I/ • • • r'\ /\ yid a/ \ \ \ i & ?• / \ M1 .?P • / aye w h P0• yP p11 ' •• / u 3 ?rrr rF • rv\ V) .r• \ P no 0 411 oll Ali? Sit '80z y'4/ • O I L ? ??? • ( I P ? FR o ``\ •? /y y?`ty ANCIS // •• FRAZIER f N? I • O N °O ¦I ?° •I NI I • I PN • v ¦ • • . I . • a PO 4 \\PPV •I i / ` \ i a °PO V\tp • ' I F?-RFBI •. .......... %1' 10, FID QP AP y /? ?Q °lp lFlrSr ORAER ` PAHKVIEW PI Hr VU RO •d• • F• ••?NJ PPPyt ?A???i? O a NTS ? sT OPEEµ \ 1?0 ??p R r yQ ?yQ. LLgqIK(EE J,1U p Q•<q? ?•J ao Umg?i. `\\GQ•6P Z IIION ST PO o ?• I I? q'I'CrS9r ?+ ?,F ELEMENTARY SCHK6OL O k 4 O OQti/issr 9LF ?p1 'b = m - T- I I ST / W y y p\`' \\.\\\\ oQ GI 'r" o°V P+ ? : 1y / q0 QQ o \\\` 9yS o ?I s ?PPPJI y0? n • I I I SgrB ,V,W 2y ?W NFNRT SP u \` \\ WALNUTST''S•FTC O 'u'9 b?P Vp O° I I r? JACK ARRII 2?ro CIISRO O O pICNLANU /` a\ > MAPLE BT Sf. M1 7i8T 0 N MAIN 0 ST 1 bUS f RATCIIFF E Op OEV Lop r kF 3 //,- /\ x a \( R O 23 , PARK SST p / Oy1 `\?`\ W yJ hj °4OYi m i? ¦ 1 RD T 9 O 9 i HAZEL °'h FW ¢ y •• / \ RA1 ?Or'l Pg? TF,, \\\ OpUNO V I- ST •Ji <4'y0 y? v \ \ 001 i \ I 4P \ 1 AR v 1- F 0 41, NOOIV w R OR p \\ a DUND i War O q y RO w'w • \ / aP\?4PO \ /a\ CV hrh ',I) J\ \\` pP0 ARYST A 2 a ?O MARSHALL gT • ?paS '• \ ?. 1- w J y • OP II d d 90 rF? q? " a? \OV• sj, ?CPp?P a u? vim WpOLy? llo Ao '> • 9 nI1? Nm c PQ` V I PG\\\`? O Ppt\a 3 f HTS TAYLOR Ia •O m BEGIN r4 *0 ?? \t.?'\\ PP Fq 9 COURT MAIN 9T 1 AVE • a • PROJECT IB RATCLIFFCO.4 j ? t J1? FOr HOUSE N a 9 HAMEn • •LL $• O vb G y0 in T 1 S? ? y? yo ?n I oY \\\\`\ MIIIER o h W pLL yo F?mF` p opK aS • sq ern I e o •? eps SUNNY81pE gp I ?o aj `\?31 / p ?WQ y ' <F r y\ AVE C?\ c ChURC r I?? ST ti o+ 90F1 m rh y`/ \ 11 b?1 "es), P? ° ti RST i y J \ J? O? y p°a • Sq I Q \\Y\ FOR ti O Z 3P Z t dT dr n'Nq ST. a• \P4 \\ MF w C ?CITY U I i 40Uip FhTRAI HALL / AST w 3J •i y ?° yi F9 h<0`r O 1 /l\ RO- _ i 1 V O y v ACA Sr POLICE, Q~ It 2 tPaj W Sr y SsFy w ¦ I/ I DOYU 3 AVE ~ F'g118),/ FIREQ O •f`p? y 3 ti.e?L ¢ \ \ \ Y W W•i S ?° sh i 4 ¢ 3 S • \ ?q tars If I °R m v • ISFp rN •r aA T Sr = ra 9? Ny4 O .•rS r'UO G'r JyE G`Q' •• 4,9 \ \ \ O 4j \ p •1 rFR U`I?? ?Py OJ?? T m RO 6LR? `??V\Q O N3 •% 90 \ \ \ 8'\e1o ?a a M P a v S \. I 'u m ?2 0 t o OLIVE H O CO 4 1141,8011°U.Y ? \ %^ N ,11100 Q E • \ /a` WOOD LEGEND • Ve O /yP gP o ° EXISTING GREENWAY TRAIL NORTII CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF m TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS EXISTING SIDEWALKS PI ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL " BRANCH PROPOSED GREENWAY TRAIL T NTS \\ ' US 23 BUS/NESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) LIMITS IV ) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO FROM THE WAYNF,E C/ I)R ? .?.?,?•..??? . / (MARSI/AIJ, STREETIWOO/WOODLAND DDRIVF,) TO US 23 BUSINESS sT / SOUTH OF SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD) = yoJ2 : NEAR WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY o " "PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ---1 z78 TIP NO. R-22104 3 n 0 KILOMETERS 0.4 0 MILES 0.28 - FIG. 2A r O ? N A F m 2 O • • •....... m LZOp 4, ? Q' N • u/ I 0o z?o0` m' y _ 0LO I \\` \ PR.•._ • 1 t i f F. r W ..` ? c J?cQ U) Lu CC QZ? V ? 1=? y J 1- N ?. N OLL. OQOCC-4 ^o? Z co V ti ? .- W W C4 U) MO U. a C4 (:) W Q Z h a N 20 5?Z ?QW b fqy J N J ? 0.4 - _ - - - _ - - - - - . 2 3v ~ ? 2 ?a W ' z 0 n y ? My W N Q ? i ? twwo y Q V T 111) 11 &Iq 11' 11 M ti w W L Q FN r O h? J =QWQ z y J O OQOCN ??W? ...Z co Z COO v- W co WW3 m?CO U. N?oa 'J?1? CO0 Wy 9 • a ?O Q N N Of M y ? y ?? ?? Ollb Ig glg T fl s all J h ti N W s a ga ? I g? da Igl ?I ^ OW W? oC a: Co O 4 ? o? N W Q ? ? ?N Q ?R ? g all 5 v yW W? Q z o a x v ti Q a A e Od,.d a o rm? o C) Q 0- a F- .0 .J w W Q 0 J :3 J W a V iii l ' v W !J' N N J a c? N F- - o -- O Aj z = 3 ? O_ ~ w o Cr o a . ?c tz N? - e`M1 t" r rp&tCW(TO U? VE. y j ¢ 4 / ? , \?,. tom,- ?---? ?'' :I? ..,I_.??- ? - •7 ` - ? ::111 ? P ? 'C yw ¦ K m r ? `' ? ?F ? site • u _/I -- \11 ?. 'JA J J J- \ I It s d 14 o co CO co `1i 0 MAN" CO N ? oC Lij O LL C) . ??^^ v? o ? a / qi r? ?:b a 0 cr. 0 ? c CL LL. 0 ti C7 0 0 O W m cc U U. O W' U L O W U 41 LL. co a O N CV g -? N a- --? (0 4-- 6 04 z- ?i ?-? N ? K ,t?r R 04 ? w N Oo 0 po a ZN cc Q(t a co w_ U? 0 v N W 0 > 0 CL z O ? z ? y O W ? C W L LU C/) c? o a z o D Q ;. ac(Q uj { 0 p? WJ O aQ?. aW op Q.(/) h W ?L z O U O Q o "' w WSJ m p C/) W O Q E' o = Z a 0 CL o Cl) X WWI Cl) = J m m= cu)- F- WO C C ?Q m^ ) ^ Q 2 O - o ° in p0 c >- Q c 0 UJ Q W G1QCl)F? C) I W CC O`,p W W W 0 LL. CO uj W ti W co %-?- ccLipW J ¢~ uj ti vQU? O Z cV f? ' d t} 1 /.l1ln / •?^' s.c', Y.... ( \?I??` \• `\\• w ?/ 1 ?( f 1f 1v\v I: 1. L•'? y.?r ? .? ?i 11• ? ?/ ??•?( 1??? -/.. ?.\',? \ ?{if,•-•\\,. 1 ?'I ?{ .. l •?. :? ..• Q `' / ?'^ •li \ : ' .. ?('S • •\__ 111• ! `? 1„S• _. yO• • ,, ?'-- •.ii ? a • ._.? • a v ! ? •It •?\ 1 \t ? \ 3?. II •? /,1/1•i ,- 1\\('' r?? i • ?,? ;' ' r? .? .: ( ,? •i j, ? ?. \` r) ?n?_J? • e ? ; I?.r•a'i ,• .:. ? \\III ? ? ? o;? / ? ? ?? •• C ? f , ;?... • • • ?M ?•,v •.% Sri ?. -----_? ?•. ) \.' 7 I 'i, • • O v - 1 .--?. rJr 1r\ \ CJ ? A I I ? f`.v 1 ?. ? ?. M.•?I • ?. d.! •, _T? (?' \p\ ?? :P 07 .. r., , , • • 1 ? ) ,D `t- r?S ? \` `/?_. • n ? ti? / \ • -• _!1.i o \ ) -?. ,',•r y ?. a .. / ck. ' , N •'4sf'??r? ? /?a + ? ? ? ,• `. ? ? - \\\ ? .' ' ,\ ,' o, ? ? ? \?-'?? ?>._ r ill ??\,\ (? `f•+. zr (D CO f Z, ?Irl 111 1 h\ L ?... •? ? • l • ( ? \ . • t 'ti r? ? Q • f..- {' - . . , :, ? I Z ?ti •% I 1, .? .' ? `, r c t -c;a ?. 1' r • '', I 1 ? ? . ?•{? C) ° •' fir/ 1 ( r ? ,?' '' ? 1 ` I f i ?. ?!. ?_. a)?. f ? - ? • l? •r`•j'\ ??/ {? ,' ,i. /! ; \ . ri „7 >t• ( o / ?i'?? • - ?/• \.J' 1) 'I?;,?/` / 11I'a •? ?r`,•. + r \ cola - /'.? ?\i•• -• i /?'' • \! `n -)? 1 ? i'"i?, • ? ? i?- _?/? ?-?'"\_..-•?..?• .1 ,?t_/ ?_.?- ?/ III ! ?? '."?? U7 .+ ?.' ?3 C-A so. t ?'\•• .-i ?•?1 \\'_ l.J J f1\ !•iiZ.a•: 't i?'-1 .? \ tX)N I -tn ! •?'• ! Y In +... .<h ? _..?? / -•`, .^\% -.\ .\,,) , C !'. i •?, v 1' )' ) q ?. !1 ' ,? \I \, ??1\?,\,1 O'er *,, :\ • a 111`• totJ 'Do tTj oc) ?• • ?' ,'? ? c\ ?? ??..-::.- ?\ . I` ? ; ? .,, ,,'• Ill ? /? ' I\* o ? ?< ??? 1 I i?w ? ,_??? ?• 1`,?'`\?/ o ? I ,.. / 111(, ?\ ?`? .1\?? Jam--'\?/_•" ' } 1 ) ! ® \ Ali 0gZ o \ n \' ', . / •" ?`(? , i? u? l . •I- _ / rn as mol, i . ...• •yfi?•.£C( ?%"°." - '+lll ,?f? wit h .rar?ut>,: it `a..vsy i g Y.HYYLk .iaLfiSY - ..p Y{ iFl`?? ? ?f. ..?. - br/ ,a° 4V\\}.-;,rrsrr.af-t I ,I\ /,' 1.; ,r-'`I l\1 ^\.ti. , +, .r. \ 1 `.,\ L ; \\ eN? 11. -1' 11 u?\`1 { ,i. ?Q• °Sepav^.1`al I?y'nltlianl h . r fl I 1I1 .I ?r •r j? ?, / I lil_ C- IL ' ??" It II ! CLYDE QUAD dl le <no I/r• % ) r 4 •- I 1 I, ?t i n /II ir'Fulbrigh( ern ? 4 ?,' 1 1 O 1 ,l \ `\ 1i?' \I +'r:ll 1 / '} cc (?' ?e??;//?• f O1 t. GY 0 ,?• ? ' •/ r?l? 'I 80. silo I' •. 7 Cle - r' r 2 5,4111,- o ` Sw to Ga , ,fU7 .11 ..? Cri1? -NN\ _.??.? ,\` `a \1<nmb? ???? •:?,• 1 \,o?- j ?•y. '?l\' ? t f v ??4? o?C° N ?1? !' 11 l??r??./•?•" ?l• ( ?'? 1 ? ?.°•A 1? \ y\ _. ^ .. jl , /I ° I? ???. ?• ' `; \.,?11?\,'li. ??'_'1?•???J ,., rv- .l%y ` 11 `/ 1 G?? 1 (ey';1"?%???•'•??0, -J\(I•\ 7 J11 1t?'??.J`. I' lr` 1 ` / \\II 1. ((l '( t?!• / . ,.(. • "?- f // ?A'C /hll(f0/ •J ;/\ ?t _' /.' •`i? -_ 111.. ?,i' .-0.-_,?\I. / '1'? `?l? •?F"I1??\1???,z ' )),•R. /•/?. •, e_??? !-=-i / ?I,Ir• ,n .4??,f'• `Q'tr,`' ... / ? ? .?? I !- ,/? _ ? ?' _ , :o"??/i ?I,I • ``t\ •+ `i`n.)? 1? ? i_ '(?v?, ••• ? / ?• 1 ?Carn? M . rl (( '? III/' -. _..• "`F, =1\ SIIDI _ 10( r I? \t? iT? /??/t - ?? a t ?/ ll• \ ?I /?I ? ?!t'? Tr;nl;. i. .?? ?/ ,l? % p? \I r ,'I,'i)r =!(i fc V v, , ? `, ? . - \ . /•.,.. ).' %?r 'll i1 ?•; \\I ? `,,,,.??..++yll 1/c. k'. 11•,' Long l i l ls\ . ' / (r: 1?`1? . s ? ? .?-'?'` 11 1?• i, ?-? ?-,?? _,__•_•r---''_•? e \\ s °7. _•? 1f_?-?r' , l` f / D11 C? fl9 _r ` ?? I l.r;; \. 11 /'V/?S : Late • ?% fa . b1 d4 N1 ' c? -' V f• 1 1'•'-. 1? 5 `^I rl unalusl{a i 6 - I p/ ?. ,??•''••. ?.?? >SnuArnlne 611. • \l ?,. .° rl /'(iCjdn( ?\\,sPool 1 'I' , kll hl /7/! + ` e?.. J ` „ !`` • l •U ?^sa" : - I? -mot \ I. Af«(LLV ,bF,.250A.,' 1 J'??=?. I c ,/ D1LC1?11 i' ?? r• t?? /q/: i "/ fit; on r .`N ilg END o °I 9. O r•a?; F4ar d f?25?3 • ° tc ?? iuscola'High ch ?e •+• G 7,. ri/1 C' ___ _?• '?I ? ? 1 •`t? t {. ??, ' iy,, ?61V E' '. ?1 Ir r?? tr • ?,./ /? ^? \® ' •a' in _ r • 4 • / - , L•d ;'? ?-.•.k t QL 1 ' /?,?J'(\/ -.?_ i:r?,` ,\i , f rr 1 y.ya• -; r ` \\ \.TJ? ?/,; i ?O•,• c°• v, /i ?.. l.. \ k ?) 1 ' r ... ?'-i1 II II t Gas 1?^J??? ' \\ \ I? _ 0• ?_` ivUC`\1 \ellow5ltl D'l;I??•f? ?, .•--.•l. ,7ic' ttl,?; /r ii • li 2u r??. i,. 1, - - - - .- (D' Sil •?' F'i II •J? , ( I swim; ming P, t v ld ( I ?i \) Grove' J_. 1 mo w.:' v ° `• r'i anl- ?, , I !11?,: .• , a 7 • 1 - , ?' •, .v';,•;11a1n>-r' /"Church /:: Goll cDUrs • /?(;\ ` I airt\'a .1??._?•/•Y w!a er 4 I'(.- n4' ` / , ° ??? r ?• '"?r? IIills? '\ _L a?a' P-' f, __ 1 r..v°cp-I i Subs _ lal cs 1 (Jer Knob' • ° 1 (1. r/?`? I ^ ???? ti \ .. - o??ll ?? 1'1U11t81•y to U l^ -. '/ Z;l - fall?Top . • /^' NSA • - ;id A I, j =\I` n iI./ ^. o 'N? r;f?}/ • {]DI L 9 1i1000oo11 CI'ee ' ?-.`i<e=9' c.; e .:/? . 1;.° „ u `/.'s `V J •r ?-?? ",? '. I /Z9 P ? °9.; t } v.-?4 `t '. ?1•n I • 1 i•1 LL`r'?/?l? i O? .•Jil t. r ? ? - Chur h? s u Raccooon Creel{ •l?D .. •1 ??? , 1`/l •,1 -? \11.0y,p 1 _ i\\ f??` , ? ? .. ' 1 •I l ! ? ?i.I 1. 1Hillues ?r'i' ??fO) l 1Gardenv Z1c111illl Creek °1?! 7L I ?? ! I I l3? I j 1 \• ?° (` i , ° - I t3 Imo. •Y ''?/ It .// rig i `? III N /. j/ , la 1 \? •°?\ ?1'?IJ:, f ^I ' ?? 1 / '`. ( r?? ???dtJ6 *?. nadio)lu y.?, - .,1 III?• :.I as \ /l1,_..111: ,} m.6•°(WHCG f'?,.14r'1-_.l.l i , ?' _ ?i??• 7:•; i..Ralklille?oveCO (;' -alt : ?':?- It e"1 /1 . ?Yn \ ` rit I /1 , r? V 1_ // 1 11f U?F`? ( l• ` u(I ? /' 1, ,„_ 1• -??r/ ?1 ra, lVaynesli le// .. -?_// , - o , C' J l '/JI/ i! r ' J7S?' 1` r tT 7?? t 7? .j,11: if i Ct,urcht /1/. ,e'l?_•c._•. D. ,'Y ;? 11'}.!;S,`1,?'L.?L' s ??_ ?i5:/1 I 11? :n.? „?•. ' _ 1 _ j rl' ...` ? i?lJf .1 t ?...? , ?. I'., (J i? l.gil li 4 1.? / _ J 4 JJ 1 is? :! •1_ (.?_? •r -_,, ??^, 11 '• _, 1 - ? ? ,. ,-a ; j -? r <? !`f .r;'rl? .` 1 - Iry PROJECT SUDY AREA 11 r\- `? - ?' ;- \?'???:1,.1y ` •,?`?rY rtsrt.'.c+ca, •00,r..n•1, 1\' •` `` I) I ?%1: ) te1 k I\-221 I r, \ " `a °?a '{?• I{::L/ UOVL p III ^(h1 it •r ::J.1 '` `'' mal..1l ??\?\ 1 ?J? \\\,' \1??,''??f•". ?4Jj?r.• '.i' r ?J I '?r(' \\?/r? ` ?') I ?I ?.) 1IAyWOO[1 COllllty I BEGIN ?yO%?FI??-?.?,7 ['•??";/I .1 rlJ°I.?l_ ?' fir((.( tt ?-- .i t l 'Sdr. ?.., Protect Area _ 2644 I{ i 4} I . 1, ep r 1 ?1 ..' , j'?% t, J '? ?s! ti ` ? •? r'? _./.. • r.? ''1 ' Water IZe$OUrees ' LLLj 01 11. Lr :'?7. ( .i ((; .. I ` %t I 1 c l 1:24000 /?//!L•^._. 1 ?) •?1 .( i:'' ,y?i ??,,'?t `•? J I (?I{;o.l) \1 l.') Fyi. _ l.?( _? r', )l `1\,11 .) ).. J, .=I +s.. .,i. _\i?/, i.// --_.. '• ??,j? .•?.r`? i`•/, 1 1.;`.// :?, ?-. '( \ •; ( ?rf 11 ?r ; 'I- •VVj.h'I ?/ J)111 ??1 r .I Il, f\`??/??.%"i_ 3=oO JJ///?- ,? i 'c^1d`?wfenh/I1lir rl ? ? /? ?.ax? ..l 1 /•?l. p )' ;'f ):?I J J ? 'i? ?(/ HI ? ( C` '\i i/(; ?i - i?) ` 'III. Itt("?."`??;.?_, = /? :. t:: /. r f l f ?, jl r i.? 11' .-;?/? ''a?n III ?' 1? , L' '1 1 {.i?(' ?i;??f? I 1 ? 'I ? 1.(? ?' ?i"11 1\. _ . h.?. 1 ?? I i `.? •.- 41t r I - (- ? ..'J 1 i!'./t%?? °.. /I--rflo- (??, :\•' ?•%' I ?„t7I(`I/( 1 , ) t , ' ?'I I - 1 , -.} ;1??\\'_ (( ? /`y C\.,.. •? I• ./ ?j 7.. _Ki f7?EN11IZ? ' •'?l '' ( ''fit, -,,.iCEA1. ?' .1 , , - \\ ?(7 ,41 1'•4)ar '-l 11 1`\ - \.ti(1 I Ilr'h' i 1 ?n°o i ? % /'i- i / ? •,r • '1• /?')1'ArI li).)?1/11? 'i., J ( j' '?>?"'"??le 'l' I I?IL \`c. _ :r??, ?? ? l 1.11 ? ,? ?l? ? •1 / '' J J 1` r'',- 1 ? 1• ?_ ?. (' L.".? - ,1 '?I ? 1 .?`- ?bo`???.i l` '?? Jle_II L\\ l'.' 1. <, _.fx >?1?? 1 y ) `\' znnq 1 •'1\?1 .1111 II I ?. 3?• 1.I i11 4?,\;?., IL If. I ?.. •1 I/1' '`1 - x„71(,/,,1 •) ,' ?` 'I /? ", Ji?l i I( I'1'•Ic ' ' = 14 %.-'r' ``.,? ... .: ?) II•` `). / •i' - ) ? L ,, o° , ,I/?.'i/ 'i' i I I 1 i,'.'` _.1 l ( ? I1'I ' ` \ ' 1'?(C.? ? p ?jfI• I ( ti 1?(I '? II'.? ?- / 11 ?: .1 ! 1?1 - 11 _,,•1•tl , _,7!( _. ?, ,r r_ LTI I,l01.1(I / / I I ?.- 1 , ?\ II -.., ! 1 ? til? ? ?ri? ?? `. `?I :`. I ?I ) ?l7 1 ?lrl(ruvlx. t : / IIl ? ;` ' T,ry J ! I• ? ? y I?J, //'f I \ 1\?I ? ?,?? _ I ?.,? 1 li{r 1 • '% (1 ,1 1 1?. ? ?-J ' ? _? '-t ? I `. .. ? i (?I /(??1. I• (? c -o /, s',? ? , •I \•-•- >_-1 ? 1 / I ) • ? L / 1 l?'\ J. n ; ,/ PIg zs/ 1 t 1 1 1 ? _ con'C •' ?, roE E}I{b/q? r1i o;a t .?? / q? {I i\t ? ( -,? '~"tl ?/' v- ' .II +I ,,??. .1., 1 t , ) ? •, I..? ? ? ? ` ?; ??'?, 1 \ Y?r- '/' .i ?-,' '` 1_ .171r,, ? -- t 1 \. Il ( IJ `- 1 1 i r / r, i 1 1 ayllcsvl?•' ( i ?-li,j ?i? .rl, ? C/ ??' ? . 1 I l ?•- 1\fnf:' - I t - `.l 1 - /J ? e(/`I/'?`i?/> ull and 1. `'cl ;,.J" ._d; > 1 . , , ' •?. ?, . ?1_ ,., - 1--_ , ,.? +' `'?. r-I !? J J •;: ?? null ry , ?r , :u ??? ?'.9) `s• ???? -? J??h -,1.? ?? ?., •? ?f? ;`C ii 1 JI ' . lub 'Ir`-•I.Ly ?;:- ` r1-ti '(,;r ?'fJf ..11,1, ,J ?` ,? ? ?1' / l\ O ? 11 /.fin _ ? •`? , / ( 1`, ? ? ? t }• / , ?. .. ., .??. WAYNESVILLE QUAD - ? ,_.._ .. -:?. :;-. : i'.??a.•.1+1i+1:r ?_ u4waA)L w..u.,•.......rw.?r....?.r.?,m?.,+ww...+.__ -- _:.?v+,?ca.?... ..,r<...-.,-..: - .:?sf...sii.c? ?,.4 ?: _ _. a5¢, ' b R-2210 A APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE AND COMMENTS RECEIVED a • P4NEST ,? rYF United States Department of the Interior Ui O ' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE H, ;0a9 Asheville Field Office 330 Ridgefield Court 1o Asheville, North Carolina 28806 July 6. 1995 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways North Carolina Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: ¦ TAKE ? PRIDE IN ?? AMERICA?¦ Subject: Scoping for proposed widening of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, North Carolina, T.I.P. No. R-2210 In your letter of June 5, 1995 (received on June 12, 1995), you requested information regarding potential environmental impacts that could result from the subject project for your use in the preparation of an environmental assessment. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C-. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). According to information provided in your letter, this project will involve the widening of US 23 Business in Waynesville from two lanes to a five-lane facility. Additionally, improvements to the US 19-23-74 interchange will be undertaken. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is familiar with the project area, which is primarily in an urban/commercial setting. The Service provides the following information for consideration in the environmental assessment. a The enclosed page identifies federally protected endangered and threatened species known from Haywood County that may occur within the area of influence of this proposed action. The legal responsibilities of a Federal agency or their designated non-Federal representative under Section 7 of the Act are on file with the Federal Highway Administration. The enclosed page also contains a list of candidate species that are currently under status review by the Service which may occur in the project impact area. Candidate species are not legally protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or_listed as endangered or threatened. We are including these species in our response in order to A-1 give you advance notification. The presence or absence of these species in the project impact area should be addressed in any environmental document prepared for this project. The Service's review of the environmental document would be greatly facilitated if the document contained the following information, if pertinent: (1) A complete analysis and comparison of the available alternatives (the build and no-build alternatives). (2) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing and required additional rights-of-way and any areas, such as borrow areas, that may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed road improvements. (3) Acreage and description of wetlands that will be filled as a consequence of the proposed road improvements. Wetlands affected by the proposed project should be mapped in accordance with the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. We recommend contacting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office (704/271-4856), to determine the need for a Section 404 Clean Water Act permit. (4) Linear feet of any water courses that will be relocated as a consequence of the proposed project. (5) Acreage of-upland habitat, by cover type, that will be eliminated because of the proposed project. (6) Description of all expected secondary and cumulative environmental impacts associated with this proposed work. (7) An analysis of the crossing structures considered (i.e., spanning structure, culverts) and the rationale for choosing the preferred structure(s). (8) A discussion on the extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat, from direct construction impacts and from secondary development impacts. (9) Mitigation measures that will be employed to avoid, eliminate, reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated with any of the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these_scoping comments and request that you continue to keep us informed as to the progress of this A-2 project. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-95-092. Si el Brian P. Cole Field Supervisor CC: Ms. Linda Pearsall, Director, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611 Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 320 S. Garden Street, Marion, NC 28752 • A-3 IN REPLY REFER TO LOG NO. 4-2-95-092 JULY 6, 1995 HAYWOOD COUNTY MAMMALS Carolina northern flying squirrel (1 ucom s sabrinus coloratus) - Endangered Alleghany woodrat (N o oma magister) - Candidate Appalachian cottontail (Svlvilagus transitionalis) - Candidate* Southern rock vole (Microtus chrotorrhinus carolinensis) - Candidate BIRDS Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucoce h? alus) - Endangered Appalachian Bewick's wren (Thrvomanes bewickii altus) - Candidate* Cerulean warbler (D n r ica cerulea) - Candidate* REPTILES Bog turtle (1 mm s muhlenbergii) - Candidate AMPHIBIANS Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) - Candidate* CLAMS Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana) - Endangered* SNAILS Engraved covert (Mes d n orestes) - Candidate INSECTS Diana fritillary butterfly ( ria Lana) - Candidate Tawny crescent butterfly (Phvcoides batesi) - Candidate PLANTS Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) - Threatened. Rock gnome lichen (Gvmnoderma lineare) - Endangered A liverwort (Plagiochila caduciloba) - Candidate* A liverwort (Plagiochila shat ii) - Candidate* A liverwort (Plagiochila sullivantii var. sullivantii) - Candidate* A liverwort (Sphenolobopsis ears ni) - Candidate* Butternut ( lans inere ) - Candidate Carolina trillium (Trillium usp illum var. Qusillum) - Candidate Manhart's sedge (Car ex manhartii) - Candidate Mount LeConte moss (Leptohvmenium h r ii) - Candidate* Mountain catchfly (Silene va a) - Candidate ` Piratebush (Buckleva distichophvlla) - Candidate Rugel's ragwort (Rugelia nudicaulis) - Candidate Tall larkspur (Delphinium exaltatum) - Candidate* Wolf's milk spurge (Euphorbia ur urea) - Candidate * Indicates no specimen from Haywood County in at least 20 years. A-4 Au) it I z North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources James B. Hunt 1t:f,Govemor Betty Ray McCain, Secretary May 1, 1997 Nicholas L. Graf Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation 310 New Bern Avenue Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442 Re: Historic Structures Survey Report for US 23 Business from Waynesville city limits to south of SR 1801, Haywood County, R-2210, Federal Aid Project STP-236(1), State Project 8.1942901, ER 97-8933 Dear Mr. Graf: Division of Archives and History kffrey J. Crow, Director Thank you for your letter of April 2, 1997, transmitting the historic structures survey report by Clay Griffith concerning the above project. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic -Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under the rrltPrirm r•itarl- Miller-Francis House (HW 81), 60 Asheville Road, Waynesville. The Miller- Francis House is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C as a good example of a late-nineteenth century Italianate-style dwelling built during Waynesville's boom years. It is also significant as a rare, surviving brick dwelling from the late-nineteenth century. The following properties were determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places: Welch-Byers House (HW 73), 1 Welch Farm Road, Waynesville. This house has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. Dr. H. L. McFayden House (HW 59), 1216 East Street, Waynesville. This house has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. Please note ' that the photograph captions for this property say "Miller House." Old Haywood County Hospital (HW 79), 1617 North Main Street, s+ Waynesville. This hospital has undergone extensive alterations and has lost integrity. A-5 109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 1?3; Nicholas L. Graf May 1, 1997, Page 2 The report in general meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions 6 concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. Sincerely, h' David Brook Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DB:slw cc: H. F(Dck B. Church Waynesville Historic Preservation Commission 0 e A-6 F°dcral Aid T TIP T - 22l b County H&V?hD CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS Brief Project Description 1nnEW V rj Z'i I o H W A rg(:V ILIA r-ITU Ll M tT5 'ia 1` 'i _ F U . Iq '2? 74 lH1'??.rt?uhr f On 66-f 31 Iggly , representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Other reviewed the subject project and agreed there are no effects on the National Register-listed property within the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse. there are no effects on the National Register-eligible properties located within the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse. there is an effect on the.National Register-listed property/properties within the project's area of potential effete. The property-properties and the effect(s) are listed on the reverse: there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties within the project's area of potential e;iect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the reverse. Signed: ???? 3 ? l ?1 q Co P.epresen a -v-e, i`4 DOT, Historic Architectural Resources Section Date the Division Administrator, or other federal Agency 0 Date Representati e, SHPO at6 S to Historic Preservation fficer A-7 Date Federal Aid it 3 ?1? TIP T (z-2210 County tMU I1joon_ Properties within area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE). Properties within area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status (N-R or DE) and describe effect. Mi ller-?c?rrci5 E-lo?sL AIt?Yna?? •Z - -?"D?? t.5o ?dvexse. ???e?fi VJ ii'h t+ \c ?OIIowi "I corai?iors I , l n all rod- ve ?rV V-1 a-lor r X91- off - of C,A. l ;2. EXQXC.1sc. o ?'to roTe-c I On (?racYi CeS ?-r ? Dod p r o-? e. 1 - M 111 e,r - ?rcx,c{5 ?ovs e L-PE7 - Akvarsc. Reason(s) why effect is not adverse (if applicable). ?c ?'e r r e? Z- l'`(1a? n a_i r<g e to i 5 r i ?--o?- wad 3 ?ro+e? 4-Cecs , J f. Initialed: NCDOT IAN-- FHWA SHP0 LD6 A-8 Lz-t o Federal Aid County NA.y,1?oy CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES :f Project Description 27 ,1S 2?i i3uy??lz?. Roil WA`f a??/i?.?.E eAry %AMtt? TO US I`1 -L' 74 - Awu ? 1? , I -t°t V , representatives of the 0 North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Other iewed the subject project at 7-- A scoping meeting Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation Other parties present agreed there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effect. there are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criterion Consideration G within the project's area of potential effect. ? there are properties over fifty years old (list attached) within the project's area of potential effect, but based on the historical information available and the photographs of each property, properties identified as rVKHC,4. 1* t - 2, to - ic; A149 1-f are considered not el gl le or the i ational egister and no further evaluation of them is necessary. there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effect. fined: c/{ ' . ? ? ? l tit °1 l !presen ' , NCDOT 'Date 9 A "HwA, r the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date 1 It °1 (0 -?) d .eprc,a native, S O to I Q Late Htsforic Preservation Officer / Dat If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included. A-9 a?..SWE ?NC)r t North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Betty Ray McCain, Secretary March 14, 1996 Nicholas L. Graf Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation 310 New Bern Avenue Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442 Re: US 23 Business from Waynesville city limits to US 19-23-74 interchange, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project STP-231301, State Project 8.1942901, TIP R-2210, ER 96-8346 Dear Mr. Graf: Division of Archives and History Jeffrey J. Crow, Director G <CI \ R \qq6 MAR '' ? ENVIRO? Thank you for your letter of February 13, 1996, transmitting the archaeological survey report by Gerold Glover concerning the above project. During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr. Glover has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this project will not involve significant archaeological resources. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. Sincerely, David Brook Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DB:slw cc: H. F. Vick G. Glover A-10 OD 109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ?? State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N FR Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Henry M. Lancaster II, Director 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse FROM: Melba McGee Y Environmental Review Coordinator RE: 95-0889 Scoping Improvements to US 23, Haywood County DATE: July 11, 1995 The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are for your consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to review. attachments RECEIVED A AL 1 .1 199 N.C. STATE CLEARINGH01_LSE a } P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolin®22411-7687 Telephone 919-733-4984 An Equal Opportunity Amrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director July 7, 1995 ID FE F1 TO: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs FROM: Monica Swihart','Water Quality Planning SUBJECT: Project Review #95-0889; Scoping Comments - NC DOT Proposed Improvements to US 23 Business, TIP No. R-2210 The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the environmental documents prepared on the subject project: A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The stream classifications should be current. B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/ relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be revegetated. C. Number of stream crossings. D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance. E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed. F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures are not placed in wetlands. G. Wetland Impacts 1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional wetlands. 2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible? 3) Have wetland impacts been minimized? 4). Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected. 5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted. 6) Summarize the total wetland impacts. 7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from DEM. P.O. Box 29535, Rdeigh, North Carolina 27626-05512 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper Melba McGee July 7, 1995 Page 2 f 0 H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM. I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as possible? Why not (if applicable)? J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques alleviate the traffic problems in the study area? K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the following: 1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. 2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation. 3. Mitigation should be in the following order: restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking. s Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed by the Department. Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 10973.mem cc: Eric Galamb A-13 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Solid Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p ? H N ? Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director June 20, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management FROM: Jack Butler, P.E., Environmental Engineering Supervisor p Superfund Section SUBJECT: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8. 1942901, T.I.P., No. R-2210 The Superfund Section was provided the attached information concerning the subject project. Our office was asked to comment on the potential for impact on CERCLA or other inactive hazardous waste sites. According to our files, the only sites on CERCLIS or Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites inventories in the vicinity of this project are the Schulhoffer Junkyard site (NCD024852675) and the Haywood County Landfill site (NCD981474190) on the east side of Waynesville as shown on the attached map. We can foresee no apparent effects from this project on these or any other CERCLIS sites or vice versa. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Attachment 1Wc WJB/ML7 0 • A P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper June 23, 1995 CDBG Response * To: Mike Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management From: Jimmy Carter, Chie Hazardous Waste ecti Subject: Improvments to US 23 Business / Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 T.I.P. No. R-2210 The Hazardous Waste Section has reviewed the above referenced proposal. Hazardous Waste Management Permits or approvals are not applicable to this project. Further, we have identified no hazardous waste management activities to cause environmental concerns in the vicinity considering the provision for alignment shifts. a A-15 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, &T1A Health and Natural Resources • • Division of Solid Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor E) E H N F? Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director June 30, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management FROM: Philip J. Prete, Head W Field Operations Branch Subject: Haywood County CDBG - Environmental Impact Study The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the attached project proposal and has seen no adverse impact on the surrounding community and likewise knows of no situations in the community which would affect the project. Haywood County should make every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in the development of this project where suitable. Questions should be directed to the Solid Waste Section, Tim Patterson, Waste Management Specialist, at (704) 251-6208. PJPncf cc: Tun Patterson P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action EmR"6 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina 117 Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources 4 7• • Division of Solid Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C) E H N F1 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director • 0 i Q July 5, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee DEHNR Record Coordinator/planning and assessment FROM: Michael A. Kelly d Deputy Director SUBJECT: Haywood County CDBG-Environmental Impact Study The Solid Waste Management Division has reviewed and commented on the above-referenced project. Please find enclosed separate comments from the Hazardous Waste Section, Solid Waste Section and Superfund Section. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to contact our office. MK:tf Enclosures cc: Jimmy Carter Phil Prete Jack Butler P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7 -k7 Telephone 919-733-4996 FAX 919-715-3605 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 509E recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper State of North Carolina Reviewing Office: Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Dae J_ 'YG-G After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. _ All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Proc Regional Office. Time PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory ti limit) Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days ? facilities, sewer system extensions, b sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days NPDES • permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection 90.120 da, ? permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre•appfication conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to N'AM discharging into state surface waters construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Reply , ( time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later. 30 days Gl Water Use Permit Pre application technical conference usually necessary N/A ) ( 7 days ? Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the installation of a well. (15 days Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit. Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 day! ? facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.06 NIA (90 day! Any open burning associated with subject proposal ? must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520. Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 day: ? NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group 919.7330820. 190 day, ? Complex source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800. The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity An erosion & sedimentatio control plan will oe required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect ) at least 30 20 day U days before beginning activity. A fee of $30 for the first acre and 520.00 for each additional acre or art must accompany the tan 130 day ? The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 day On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount ? Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any area 30 day mined greater than one acre must be permited. The appropriate bond (60 day must be received before the permit can be issued. ? North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day exceeds 4 days (NIA) Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day ? counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA) should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned." 90.120 d Oil Relining Facilities NIA (NIA) If permit required. application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 dal ? Dam Safety Permit inspect construction. certify construction is according to EHNR approv• ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 dAl a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces- sary to verily Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of 5200.00 must ac- compan t pplication. An additional processing fee based on a percen the total project cost will be required upon completion. Continued on reverse Pb it: ,f 1995 State of North Carolina Fe5ources Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Divis ion of Land Resources James G. Martin, Governor PROJECT REVIEW COl4 ENTS Charles H. Gardner William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary ?j '?`cC,t Director • Project Number: ( r-C.11'j county: HAyt<-arJO 0 Project Name: 4/. 5. • 23 PSus • OOT? ? I q q-z9o 1 ^T"1 P ` ?-ZZ1d) Geodetic Survey This project will impact -5 geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior *to construction at P.O. Box* 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 (919) 733-3836. Intentional destruction of a geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4. This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers. • 0 Other (comments attached) For more information contact the Geodetic survey office at (919) 733-3836. Reviewer Date Erosion and Sedimentation Control No comment _ This projeclt will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation control plan prior to beginning any land=disturbing activity if more than one (1) acre will be disturbed. _ If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part of the erosion and sedimentation control plan. If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management, increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply. The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission. other (comments attached) For more information contact the Land Quality Section at (919) 733-4574. Reviewer Date A-19 P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone (919) 733-3833 An Fnual Onnortimity Alfirmvrfve• Artlnn Fmnlnvor U North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs ept 9f j nvironment, Health, & Natural Resources FROM: 4-David Yow, District 9 Habitat Biologist Habitat Conservation Program DATE: July 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Request for information for transportation improvements to US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, North Carolina, OLIA Project No. 95-0889, TIP No. R- 2210. This memorandum responds to a request from Mr. H. Franklin Vick of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the proposed project, and our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The proposed work involves improvements to an existing urban thoroughfare. The NCWRC supports such improvements over development of new roadway corridors. However, we encourage the NCDOT to work with local planners in retaining the transportation utility of the improved roadway through management of access. Direct impacts of roadway widening may include loss of wetland and upland wildlife habitat and channelization or sedimentation of trout streams and coolwater fish habitat. In addition to the specific concerns mentioned above, the NCWRC offers the following list of general recommendations and informational needs: 1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern species. When practicable, potential borrow areas to be used for project construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated animal and plant species can be developed through consultation with: A-20 95-0889 Memo Page 2 July 11, 1995 The Natural Heritage Program N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, N. C. 27611 (919) 733-7795 and, • Cecil C. Frost, Coordinator NCDA Plant Conservation Program ' P. 0. Box 27647 Raleigh, N. C. 27611 (919) 733-3610 2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. 3. Project map identifying wetland areas. Identification of wetlands may be accomplished through coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the COE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria listed. 4. Description of project activities that will occur within wetlands, such as fill or channel alteration. Acreages of wetlands impacted by alternative project designs should be listed. 5. Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities. 6. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands and uplands). 7. Any measures proposed to avoid or reduce impacts of the project or to mitigate unavoidable habitat losses. 8. A list of document preparers which shows each individual's professional background and qualifications. It is the policy of the NCWRC that impacts to wetlands be avoided. Non-wetland and non-riparian alternatives should be examined during project design. Where wetland losses are unavoidable, the NCWRC will recommend mitigation of the losses. To avoid or minimize wetland impacts, we offer several general recommendations. Crossings of wetlands and streams should be minimized and located at narrow areas and made perpendicular to the stream. Any disturbed wetland areas should be returned to original soils and contours. Plant communities should be re-established which would result in plant community succession into habitat of equal or greater value than that which was destroyed. Relocation of stream channels should be avoided. Because Haywood County is a "trout water county" under administration of Nationwide and General 404 permits by the Corps of Engineers, the NCWRC will review designs of all wetland and stream crossings at the time of permitting. A-2l 95-0889 Memo Page 3 July 11, 1995 Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your office, please contact me at (704) 274-3646. cc: Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Section Mgr. Janice Nicholls, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Michael Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT A-22 ® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391 • Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT FROM: Mark S. Davis, Western Mountain Region Coordinator /?l? Habitat Conservation Program DATE: May 19, 1997 SUBJECT: Request for information for transportation improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Road), from the Waynesville Town Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), near Waynesville, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project No. 8.194290 1, TIP No. R- 2210 A. This memorandum responds to a request by you for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the proposed project, and an onsite investigation was conducted on May 15, 1997, for the purpose of assessing construction impacts on wildlife and fisheries resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The proposed project consists of widening the existing two-lane shoulder facility in an area of extensive commercial development. The NCWRC supports such improvements over development of new roadway corridors. Project impacts to fish and wildlife habitat is primarily related to Raccoon Creek and associated wetlands. Trout waters are not involved, but the NCWRC is concerned about sedimentation and potential impacts to aquatic resources in Raccoon Creek and Lake Junaluska, which lies downstream of the project site. In addition to the specific concerns mentioned above, the NCWRC recommends that the following information be included in the 404 permit application: 1. Description of project activities that will occur within any streams or wetlands. 2. Type of new crossing structure to be utilized at Raccoon Creek, e.g., reinforced concrete box culvert, CMP, or a spanning structure. If concrete is used at stream crossing, we recommend that adequate precautions be taken to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Uncured concrete affects water quality and is toxic to fish and other organisms. A-23 TIP No. R-2210 A Page 2 May 19, 1997 Because Haywood County is recognized as a "trout water county" by the Corps of Engineers, the NCWRC will review any Nationwide or General 404 permits for this project. While we do not anticipate modification of the project because of trout waters, we will evaluate the extent to which the project design avoids and minimizes impacts to surface waters. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your office, please contact me at (704) 452-2546. A-24 ?OD COG vN.C. y? Haywood County Planning Department Courthouse Annex III 2200 Asheville Road Waynesville. NC 28786 \18 O a (704) 452-6632 • December 20, 1995 i Mr. Whit Webb, Manager N.C.D.O.T. Program Development Branch P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Whit, I would like to receive your guidance on how to proceed with a concern in Haywood County. Highway 23, the old road between Asheville and Waynesville, is scheduled to be widened from a two-lane to a five-lane road. The Chairman of the County Commissioners received a letter from Mr. Franklin Vick giving us preliminary information about the project, and gave Mr. Michael Paylor as the contact person. Right now, there is no sidewalk along the part of 23 that will be widened, and the road is so narrow with so many curves that there is barely room to walk on the shoulder. Along the path of the project, there is an elementary school, two county office buildings that house the Health Department, Building Inspections, Environmental Health, Addressing, Planning, and Erosion Control. Where the widening project will end is the new Lowe's store (the largest in the region) and just past Lowe's is the high school. Wal-Mart is located one- fourth of a mile from Lowe's, and Lake Junaluska (the regional Methodist conference center and a popular place to walk) is located one-half mile from Wal-Mart. This is certainly an area where many people would be likely to walk if it were safe. Where the road has been widened, closer to Waynesville, there is a sidewalk on both sides of the street. I called Mr. Paylor to discuss my concerns with him. He was most helpful when I called, and said that he would pass along the request for a bike lane to the appropriate DOT office. He also said that the issue of sidewalks was more complicated because we are a county government, not a municipality. He explained that the current policy is to request the municipality to contribute to the cost of the sidewalk on a proportional basis, depending on population; there is no procedure established for counties. I have discussed this matter with Jack Horton, the County Manager. He would like me to pursue the issue with the County Commissioners, but first we need a cost estimate for our share. Would it be possible to establish a new formula for counties. based on the population of the closest municipality to the road project" A-25 Mr. Whit Web Page Two December 20, 1995 It is quite possible that the County Commissioners will vote not to participate in the funding. In the first place this issue has never come up before, and in the second they are also attempting to fund a new sewer line. They may feel that construction of the sewer line is more important than a sidewalk and bike lane. However, I would like to at least raise this issue as a possibility. Perhaps in the future if the opportunity were to present itself again, more thought would be given to a sidewalk. This issue is very important to me for several reasons. In addition to the obvious ones of safety, fitness and the environment, I was involved in an accident 15 years ago in Boston when I was riding my bike on the sidewalk. I was badly injured when I was hit head on by a car who jumped the curb. I have had two operations on my knees but have never fully recovered. I live in constant pain and am limited in what I can do. I want to do all I can to ensure that we have a safe world for cyclists and pedestrians. Thank you for your help. Best wishes for happy holidays and joy in the new year. Sincerely, G' Faust Planning Director c: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer A-26 (Wtff"NESVILIE OFFICE OF MAYOR Town of Waynesville • 0 June 28, 1995 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning & Environmental Branch N.C.D.O.T. P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611-5201 CE JUL T 1995 2 OIV'SICV OF C? MIGHWAVS g ccy??R???Py Subject: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to North of US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1), State Project NO. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 Dear Mr. Vick: The majority of the aforementioned project will take place in the one mile extraterritorial land use jurisdiction of Waynesville which extends on the west side of US 23 Business to the High Tech Center and on the east side of US 23 Business to Carolina Power and Light's substation property. The project will have the greatest impact on Waynesville's Sign Ordinance and the Flood Hazard Reduction Ordinance. Several nonconforming signs exist along the edges of US 23 Business. The legal, nonconforming signs exist on private property and they are nonconforming because they are "off premise" signs which are prohibited by Section 154.083-1 of the Town of Waynesville Code of Ordinances. If the nonconforming signs are removed due to road widening activities, a sign permit cannot be issued for the relocation of the illegal, "off premise" signs. The Flood Hazard Reduction Ordinance prohibits any encroachments or fill material in the 10 year floodway unless a registered P.E. can certify that the encroachments or fill material will not create an increase in the base flood discharge. The proposed highway project runs parallel to Raccoon Creek which is included as part of the Town's official flood maps. The Town should receive copies of the drawings pertaining to the road widening activities to determine compliance with floodplain ordinances. A-27 POB C•100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786.0100 • PHONE (704) 456.3515 Mr. H. Franklin Vick 06-28-95 Page 2 I appreciate the notification of the proposed project and if the Town can be of any assistance, please contact me. If you have questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact John Swift at (704) 452-0401. Sincerely, Henry B. Foy Mayor HBF:pm A-28 POB C-100. 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 - PHONE (704) 456-3515 \of WAYNESVIUE OFFICE OF TOWN MANAGER Town of WaynesvYlle • • July 22, 1996 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmenial Branch Division of Highways Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: RECD ?G 7 Jul ? 7:5 ',? ,? , . 1995 On June 17, 1996, we received your letter regarding the Town's desire to have sidewalks included in the project for improvements to U. S. Route 23 east of the Waynesville Town Limits. Your letter asked that we respond by July 2, 1996. The letter came at our busiest time of the year, as we were completing the 1996-1997 budget, closing out the 1995-1996 fiscal year, preparing a Community Development Block Grant application and dealing with three different law suits. We simply have not been able to address the extensive requirements in DOT's Pedestrian Policy Guidelines, and it will be mid-August before our small staff will have it done. I wanted to write you to explain the delay in our responding and to assure you that my failure to respond in the brief time allotted should not be viewed as a decline in the Town's interest in seeing sidewalks constructed as a part of this project. My Town Board remains very interested in seeing sidewalks included on the west side of the road for at least a portion of the distance the project covers. There are numerous homes along the west side and the children in these homes need the sidewalk to access Junaluska School. Please do not take any action which would eliminate the sidewalk from consideration. We will make every attempt to complete the work involved in Pedestrian Policy Guidelines as rapidly as possible, and I will try to have it in your hands by August 15. 1 would again apologize for the delay in responding. Sincerely, G A. Lee Galloway Town Manager A-29 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 - PHONE (704) 456.3515 WAYMESV II E Town ofWaynesville ti G E I August 12, 1996 Q H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager AUG 1 0 1996 Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways ?VISICN P. O. Box 25201 H? Raleigh, NC 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Vick: Subject: US 23 Business (Asheville Rd.) From the Waynesville Town Limits to US 19-23-74, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1)_State Project No. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 On June 7, 1996, the Town received your letter along with the NQDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines. We, at the Town of Waynesville, would like to thank you for taking the time to review this vital project. The following criteria are evaluated to demonstrate the need for a sidewalk along the Asheville Road project from the existing sidewalk at the town limits to Howell Mill Road on the northern west margin. Local Pedestrian Policy Attached is a zoning map of the project area. Two thirds of the proposed sidewalk road frontage is zoned residential. Much of the existing route is old strip commercial zoning which is no longer the policy of the Town. We prefer to cluster commercial zones at the intersections (Howell Mill and Ratcliff Cove Roads) and to maintain the residential character of the neighborhoods of Hillside Terrace, Sims Circle, Meadowood and Monte Vista Drive. The proposed sidewalk ties the two commercial areas to the school and the residential neighborhoods to facilitate pedestrian travel. Local Government or Local Sponsor Commitment Waynesville and Haywood County will assume responsibility of maintaining the sidewalk. When the Town annexes the area, the Town will assume responsibility of maintaining the sidewalk. The Pigeon River Fund has donated $7,800 to continue development of a multi-use trail (the Richland Creek Greenway Trail) from Lake Junaluska to the Waynesville Recreation Park which will form the core of pedestrian facility commitment by the Town, the County, Lake Junaluska Assembly and the Richland Creek Action Committee. A-30 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST, WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 • PHONE (704) 456.3515 H. Franklin Vick 08-12-96 Page 2 Continuity and Integration Upon completion of the project, the new sidewalk along with the local Richland Creek Greenway will provide an integrated system of pedestrian facilities. The Richland Creek Greenway Trail connects Lake Junaluska Assembly with the Town of Waynesville's Recreation Facilities and sidewalks along city streets. The proposed sidewalk along Asheville Road will connect neighborhoods and school facilities to the Greenway Trail from North Main Street and again at Howell Mill Road. The Little Champion Fitness Trail already exists along the Greenway Trail near the end of the sidewalk at Howell Mill Road. See the attached map for locations of existing and proposed Greenway Trail and pedestrian facilities. • 0 Generators This sidewalk will serve as a primary access for those children attending Junaluska Elementary School. At the current point in time, these children are unable to walk along the street due to the unsafe conditions of the area in front of the school. This poses a huge problem since many children live so close to the school but must be bussed in due to the adverse conditions. Less buses could be used if sidewalks were put in. See photographs attached. Safety The presence of the elementary school and the school system baseball and softball fields (also used for soccer fields during other seasons) means a great number of children will use the sidewalk. Existing or Projected Traffic Projected usage of the facility will exceed 150 pedestrians per 24 hour period along the corridor based on school enrollments, recreation fields, Fitness Trail access and access to the Richland Creek Greenway Trail. With future commercial development at Ratcliff Cove Road, pedestrian travel could further increase. Your assistance and consideration is appreciated. Do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 456-4410 if questions or comments arise. This pedestrian facility is important to the Town and the County. Sincerel rederick Ba er, P.E. Director of Public Works/Utilities FLB:pm Attachments r A-31 POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 • PHONE (704) 456-3515 2 • R-2210 A APPENDIX B GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY a'o4 a? I 4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GAwu-n JR. GovERNOR SECRETARY 40 January 10, 1996 STATE PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210) COUNTY: Haywood DESCRIPTION: US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Frank Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch ATTENTION: Mr. M' el??Paylo FROM: Gr ?DS14?tit , GeoEnvironmental Supervisor Geotechnical Unit SUBJECT: Addendum to Geology & Hazardous Materials Evaluation Site #1. Parcel # 212 -- John K. & Betty O. Reeves Property Site #2. Parcel # 148 -- David & Linda Blevins Site #3. Parcel # 114 -- Clarence Allen Shelton Property Attached for your review is a copy of the "Preliminary Site Assessment" report. This report was prepared for the NCDOT Geotechnical Unit by Front Royal Environmental Services, Incorporated. Two of the sites were previously covered in the original Geology and Hazardous Materials Evaluation report dated February 11, 1994. Quality Auto Service was not in this original report. All are included here because additional work was performed. A brief description of each site is as follows: Site #1 Parcel #212 -- John K & Betty O Reeves Properly, (Quality Auto Parts) This former gas station is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of US 19- 23-74 and US 23 B (Old Asheville Road) on the north side of access road SR 1375. The business is now operated as an auto parts dealer and garage. According to an employee at the facility, all the underground storage tanks (USTs) at this site were removed approximately five years ago. Front Royal conducted a survey of the site and did not locate any tanks. Three of five samples from the former UST pit area contained petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of state action levels. B-1 Mr. Frank Vick January 10, 1996 Page 2 Site #2 Parcel #148 David and Linda Blevins (Exxon Gag-N-Groceries #1)• This gas station is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of US 23B (Old Asheville Road) and SR 1196. According to the DEM database, this facility (ID # 0- 010999) has three (3) fiberglass (FPR) gasoline USTs (two 10,000 and one 8,000 gallon), two (2) FPR diesel USTs (8,000 and 2,000 gallon) and one (1) FPR kerosene UST (2,000 gallon) on the premises. All six USTs were installed on April 19, 1988. The tanks are approximately 81 feet from the centerline of US 23B and approximately 18 feet from the centerline of SR 1196. Front Royal collected four soil samples adjacent to the tank-bed areas and the associated pump island. Only one of these samples contained contamination above the detection limit. Sample SB-9 contained 22.3 parts per million (ppm) diesel for EPA Method 3550. Front Royal prepared a Site Sensitivity Evaluation (SSE) for the property, which indicated a final cleanup level of 160 parts per million (ppm). Proposed right-of way only affects the pump island, but if any improvements are made to the Y-line SR 1196 the tank bed will probably be impacted. Site #3 Parcel #114 Clarence Allen Shelton (E-Z Stop, Inc.)-. This gas station is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of US 23B (Old Asheville Road) and SR 1250 (Sims Circle Road). Mr. Shelton, the current property owner, said he witnessed removal of the underground storage tanks (USTs) from the site approximately two and a half years ago. There was evidence of tank removal approximately 46 feet from the center line of US 23B. Front Royal conducted a survey of the site and did not locate any tanks. A tank closure report could not be located from the DEM-Groundwater Section for this work. Front Royal collected two soil samples from the former tank pit area. None of the samples contained contamination above state action levels. Roadway design should avoid Site #1 since there is confirmed contamination on this site. If this property is acquired by DOT, the department could potentially be held liable for proper cleanup and remediation of it. If the site cannot be avoided, the Geotechnical Unit will make recommendations on it once the Roadway Design Unit has provided us with plans showing the proposed right-of-way. Please contact Gene Tarascio at (919) 250-4088, if you have any questions or comments concerning these recommendations. GAS/ET Enclosure IF 0 w 6 cc: Sandra Stepney, Roadway Design Unit B-2 9 n R-2210 A APPENDIX C HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE AND CONSTRUCTION NOISE/ AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS TABLES y TABLE N1 HEARING: SOUNDS BOMBARDING US DAILY It • 140 Shotgun blast, jet 30 m away at takeoff PAIN Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR PAIN THRESHOLD 130 Firecrackers 120 Severe thunder, pneumatic jackhammer Hockey crowd Amplified rock music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD 110 Textile loom 100 Subway train, elevated train, farm tractor Power lawn mower, newspaper press Heavy city traffic, noisy factory LOUD 90 D Diesel truck 65 kmph 15 m away E 80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal C Average factory, vacuum cleaner I Passenger car BO kmph 15 m away MODERATELY LOUD B 70 E Quiet typewriter L 60 Singing birds, window air-conditioner S Quiet automobile Normal conversation, average office QUIET 50 Household refrigerator Quiet office VERY QUIET 40 Average home 30 Dripping faucet Whisper 1.5 m away 20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves AVERAGE PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING Whisper JUST AUDIBLE 10 0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING Sources: world Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body, Encyclopedia Americana, "Industrial Noise and Hearing Conversation" by J. B. Olishifski and E. R. Harford y (Researched by N. Jane Hunt and published in the Chicago Tribune in an illustrated graphic by Tao Heinz.) C-1 TABLE N2 NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA) Activity Category Leq(h) Description of Activity Category A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public (Exterior) need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, (Exterior) hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above. (Exterior) D -- Undeveloped lands E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and (Interior) auditoriums. Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA) Existing Noise Level Increase in dBA from Existing Noise in Lsq(h) Levels to Future Noise Levels <50 > 15 > 50 > 10 Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines. C-2 K TABLE N3 AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS (Le4) US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project / e.1942901 , TIP N R-2210 • NOISE LEVEL SITE LOCATION DESCRIPTION (dBA) 1. US 23 Business 300m SW of SR 1818 Grassy 65 2. US 23 Business @ Haywood Christian Paved 66 3. US 23 Business @ Blossman Gas Inc. Gravel 65 Notes The ambient noise level sites were measured at 15 meters from the center of the nearest lane of traffic. C-3 TABLE N4 1/3 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From waynesville,City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project # 8.1942901, TIP # R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVEL ID# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE( m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE( m) -L- -Y- MAXIMUM INCREASE ..... ............. .... ............... .. .o.. ......... o.... .. .............. ... ..... ... From Beginning of Project (Waynesville City Limits) to SR 1191 1 Business C US 23 BUS 22.0 L 62 US 23 BUS 25.0 L - - 67 + 5 2 Business C " 15.0 L 65 " 20.0 L - - 69 + 4 3 Business C " 14.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 4 Business C " 13.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 5 Business C " 15.0 R 65 " 29.0 R - - 66 + 1 6 Business C " 35.0 R 59 " 35.0 R - - 65 + 6 7 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 19.0 L - - * 69 + 6 8 Residence B " 47.0 L 57 " 36.0 L - - 65 + e 9 Residence B " 40.0 L 58 " 26.0 L - - * 67 + 9 10 Residence B " 28.0 L 61 " 15.0 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- 11 Residence B " 16.0 L 64 " 3.0 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- " 63 0 " 9 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- 12 Residence B 21.0 L . 13 Residence B •' 35.0 L 59 " 23.0 L - - * 68 + 9 14 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 11.0 L -------------------R/W------ ----- -- 15 Residence B '• 30.0 L 60 " 22.0 L - - * 68 + 8 16 Residence B " 42.0 L 57 " 35.0 L - - 65 + 8 17 Residence B " 23.0 L 62 " 23.0 L - - * 68 + 6 18 Residence B " 14.0 L 65 " 16.0 L - - * 70 + 5 19 Residence B " 19.0 L 63 " 24.0 L - - * 68 + 5 20 Residence B " 130.0 L 60 " 35.0 L - - 65 + 5 21 Residence B " 16.0 L 64 " 20.0 L - - * 69 + 5 22 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 30.0 L - - * 66 + 5 23 Residence B " 16.0 L 64 " 20.0 L - - * 69 + 5 24 Business C " 32.0 R 60 '• 27.0 R - - 67 + 7 25 Business C " 32.0 R 60 " 27.0 R - 67 + 7 26 Business C " 26.0 R 61 " 23.0 R - - 68 + 7 27 Business C " 13.0 L 65 " 17.0 L - - 70 + 5 28 Church E " 14.0 L 65/40 " 18.0 L - - 70/45 + 5/5 29 Residence B " 14.0 L 65 " 18.0 L - - " 70 + 5 30 Residence B '• 36.0 L 59 " 37.0 L - - 64 + 5 NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/ interior (58/48). Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772). C-4 TABLE N4 2/3 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA 6UMMARY 9 • I i US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Ha ywood County State Project A 5.1942901, TIP N R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEV EL ID1 LAND USE CATEGORY ...................... NAME DISTANCE(m) ................. LEVEL ..... NAME DISTANCE(m) ................. -L- -Y- MAXIMUM ........................ INCREASE ........ From SR 1191 (Francis Street) to SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) 31 Residence B US 23 BUS 24.0 L 62 US 23 BUS 25.0 L - - " 67 + 5 32 Residence B " 45.0 L 57 " 46.0 L - - 62 + 5 33 Residence B " 23.0 L 62 " 35.0 L - - 65 + 3 34 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 25.0 L - - " 67 + 6 35 Residence B 46.0 L 57 " 49.0 L - - 62 + 5 36 Residence B " 20.0 L 63 " 24.0 L - - " 68 + 5 37 Residence B " 45.0 L 57 " 49.0 L - - 62 + 5 38 Residence B 25.0 L 61 25.0 L - - * 67 + 6 39 Residence B " 26.0 L 61 29.0 L - - * 66 + 5 40 Residence B " 25.0 L 61 " 25.0 L - - " 67 + 6 41 Business C " 19.0 R 63 " 19.0 R - - 69 + 6 42 Residence B 24.0 L 62 " 7.0 L -------------------R/W---- ------- -- 43 Residence B 35.0 L 59 " 31.0 L - - " 66 + 7 44 Business C " 20.0 L 63 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 4 45 Business C " 15.0 L 65 " 20.0 L - - 69 + 4 46 Business C " 20.0 L 63 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 4 47 Business C " 25.0 R 61 " 17.0 R - - 70 + 9 48 Business C " 20.0 L 63 " 35.0 L - - 65 + 2 49 Residence B 24.0 L 62 " 50.0 L - - 61 - 1 50 Residence B 34.0 L 59 " 50.0 L - - 61 + 2 51 Business C 25.0 L 61 " 20.0 L - - 69, + 8 52 Residence B " 34.0 R 59 " 40.0 R - - 64 + 5 53 Residence B 23.0 R 62 " 30.0 R - - " 66 + 4 54 Residence B " 20.0 R 63 " 25.0 R - - " 67 + 4 55 Residence B " 21.0 R 63 " 26.0 R - - ' 67 + 4 56 Business C " 22.0 R 62 " 26.0 R - - 67 + 5 57 Business C " 24.0 L 62 " 25.0 L - - 67 + 5 58 Business C " 17.0 L 64 " 21.0 L - - 69 + 5 59 Residence B " 27.0 R 61 " 20.0 R - - " 69 + 8 60 Business C " 14.0 R 65 " 10.0 R -------------------R/W------------- 60a Residence B " 36.0 R 59 " 30.0 R - - " 66 + 7 60b Business C " 35.0 R 59 " 31.0 R - - 66 + 7 NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). It ?> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772). C-5 TABLE N4 FBWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project A 8.1942901, TIP M R-2210 AMBIENT NEAREST RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY ID# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) From SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive) To End of Project 61 Business C US 23 BUS 45.0 R 57 US 23 BUS 45.0 R 62 Residence B " 34.0 L 59 " 30.0 L 63 Residence B " 46.0 L 57 " 30.0 L 64 Residence B " 26.0 L 61 " 20.0 L 65 Business C " 16.0 R 64 " 21.0 R 66 Business C " 16.0 R 64 " 20.0 R 67 Business C " 15.0 L 65 " 10.0 L 68 Business C " 14.0 L 65 " 10.0 L I PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS -L- -Y- MAXIMUM 3/3 NOISE LEVEL INCREASE 62 + 5 * 66 + 7 - * 66 + 9 - * 69 + 8 - 69 + 5 69 + 5 -------------------R/W------------- -------------------R/W------------- 9 • M NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L--> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution. All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways. Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). * -> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFA Part 772). E C-6 A • M • Description 1. From Beg. of Project to SR 1191/SR 1818 2. From SR 1191 to SR 1267 3. From SR 1267 to SR 1801 4. From SR 1801 to US 19-23-74 5. From US 19-23-74 to End of Project TABLE N5 FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project M 8.1942901, TIP N R-2210 Maximum Predicted Contour Leq Noise Levels Distances dBA (Maximum) 15 m 30 m 60 m 72 dBA 67 dBA 69 65 59 <15 m 28 m 68 64 58 <14 m 25 m 71 67 61 17 m 35 m 71 67 62 20 m 38 m 69 65 59 <15 m 28 m TOTALS Approximate Number of Impacted Receptors According to Title 23 CFR Part 772 A B C D E 0 11 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES - 1. 15m, 30m, and 60m distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane. 2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway. 0 26 0 0 0 C-7 1 TABLE N6 TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE SUMMARY US 23 Business From Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 Haywood County State Project A 8.1942901, TIP M R-2210 RECEPTOR EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Substantial Impacts Due Noise Level to Both Section <.0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >- 25 Increases(1) Criteria(2) 1. From Beg. of Project to 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 1191/SR 1818 2. From SR 1191/SR 1818 to 1 9 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 1267 3. From SR 1267 to SR 1801 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. From SR 1801 to US 19-23-74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5. From US 19-23-74 to End of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project TOTALS 1 11 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (1) As defined by only a substantial increase (See bottom of Table N2). (2) he defined by both criteria in Table N2 C-8 TABLE Al CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County • SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ---- - -------------- --------- VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES -------------- RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 1997, Build ZO - 108. CM ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM PAGE 1 LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 YI X2 " Y2 " (M) ------"----------- Ph) ---------- (G/MI) -------------- (M) ----- (M) (VEH) ------------------ ---------------------- 1. Far Lane Link ------------------------------ -- " 10.8 -805.0 10.8 ---- 805.0 " 1610. 360. AG , 850. 20.1 .0 13.2 2. Near Lane Link • .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 • 1610. 180. AG 850. 20.1 .0 13.2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ " RECEPTOR -------------------------"--- 1. R/W, 15.2 m From CL * MODEL RESULTS ------------- COORDINATES (M) X Y Z " -------------------------------- -9.8 .0 1.8 * REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* RECI MAX * 3.1 DEGR. * 12 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.10 PPM AT 12 DEGREES FROM REC1 . C-9 TABLE A2 PAGE 2 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD . .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES -------------- RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 2017, Build ZO - 108. CM ATIM - 60. MINUTES . MIXH - 1000. M AM - 1.8 PPM LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE " X1 Y1 X2 Y2 " (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ----- --------------- ----R----------------------------------------R---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Far Lane Link • 10.8 -805.0 10.8 805.0 • 1610. 360. AG 1470. 14.8 .0 13.2 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 • 1610. 180. AG 1470. 14.8 .0 13.2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) ' RECEPTOR * X Y Z -------------------------R-------------------------------------R 1. R/W, 15.2 m From CL " -9.8 .0 1.8 • MODEL RESULTS ------------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND • CONCENTRATION ANGLE " (PPM) (DEGR)" REC1 MAX " 3.4 DEGR. • 8 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.40 PPM AT 6 DEGREES FROM REC1 . s 0 C-10 TABLE A3 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 s JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County • SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES -------------- RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 1997, No-Build ZO - 108. CM ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM PAGE 3 LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) " LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE • X1 Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) -- "----------- (DEG) ---------- (G/MI) --------------- (M) ----- (M) (VEH) --------------- ----------------------- 1. Far Lane Link - "-------------------------- • 3.6 -805.0 ----- 3.6 ------- 805.0 • 1610. 360. AG . 850. 27.1 .0 9.6 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 " 1610. 180. AG 850. 27.1 .0 9.6 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) " RECEPTOR " X Y Z " ------------------------- "-------------------------------------" 1. R/W, 9.1 m From CL " -7.3 .0 1.8 " MODEL RESULTS ------------- REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)" REC1 MAX * 3.9 DEGR. " 8 • THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.90 PPM AT 8 DEGREES FROM REC1 . C-11 y TABLE A4 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 JOB: R-2210: US 23 Business, Haywood County SITE a METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS - .0 CM/S VD . .0 CM/S U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 4 (D) LINK VARIABLES -------------- RUN: US 23 Bus, Year 2017, No-Build ZO 108. CM ATIM 60. MINUTES MIXH - 1000. M AMB - 1.8 PPM PAGE 4 LINK DESCRIPTION " LINK COORDINATES (M) " LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE " X1 Y1 X2 Y2 ' (M) (D$G) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------ ----------------------------------------"---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Far Lane Link " 3.6 -805.0 3.6 805.0 " 1610. 360. AG 1470. 71.9 .0 9.6 2. Near Lane Link " .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 * 1610. 180. AG 1470. 71.9 .0 9.6 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) " RECEPTOR " X Y Z " ------------------------- *-------------------------------------" 1. R/W, 9.1 m From CL " -7.3 .0 1.8 " MODEL RESULTS REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum. WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360. WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 MAX * 11.3 DEGR. * 10 THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 11.30 PPM AT 10 DEGREES FROM REC1 . L LJ t n :J C-12 R-2210 A I? APPENDIX D RELOCATION REPORT AND DISCUSSION OF DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS L IF >A e RELOCATION REPORT REVISED El E.I.S. 0 CORRIDOR [:] DESIGN North Carolina Department of Transportation ARP14.RELpdATION OFFICE " PROJECT: 18.1942901 1 COUNTY i Haywood Alternate ' .,1, of 1 Alternate I I.D. NO.: R-2210 F.A. PROJECT j STP-23-13(1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: US 23 Business From the Waynesville City Limits to US 19-23-74 1 ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL Type of ? Displacees Owners Tenants i Total Minorities 0-15M ! 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP Residential ! 4 I 0± 4 0 0 I 0 1 1! 3 0 Businesses 3 1 4 . 7 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE Farms 0 1 0 ; 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent Non-Profit 01 0 1 0 0 0-20M 0 S 0-150 0 0-20M 0 5 0-150 ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nt ! 0 150-250 0 20-40m 1 150-250 0 Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70m 1 250-400 0 40-70M 3 250-400 2 X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-1 00m i 3 . 400-600 0 70-10CM 7 400-600 1 X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 up 0 ! 600 up 0 100 LP 10 600 up 0 displacement? TOTAL 4 0 21 3 X j 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number) project? X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so. indicate size, type, estimated number of See attached sheet. employees, minorities, etc. X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? 6. Source for available housing (list). i X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? X S. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? X 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. families? X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? X 11. Is public housing available? X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing available during relocation period? X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within financial means? X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list source). 15. Number months estimated to complete RELOCATION? 12 MONTHS YK 6 REVISED W W I 10-29-96 O -Z(::- Relocation Aaent Date Approved b Date Form 15.4 Revised 02/95 d Onginal & 1 Copy. State Fe!ocatton Agent 2 Copy Area Relocation Office D-1 R-2210 8.1942901 Haywood 3. Will not be disrupted due to the project. 4. A. Arrowwood Products, Waynesville, N. C., custom cabinetry & refinishing, 704/452-4452, 2 employees, 1,500-1,600 SF, no minorities. B. Seay's Motor Court, 1 office, 2 duplex units, 1,500 SF, kitchenettes, one employee. No minorities. C. Mary's Fashions, etc., 1,000 SF, one employee, sells women's clothing, etc. D. The Stitchery, alternations, one employee, 1,200 SF E. Suburban Propane, propane cylinders exchanged, 2,800 SF, 2 employees, sale of gas appliances. No minorities. F. Waynesville Family Practice Center, PA., occupied by 7 doctors, 6,600 SF, 16 employees. No minorities. G. One-story frame business, Craftshop, 700 SF, 1 employee. No minorities. 6. Century 21-Great Smokies Realty, Waynesville, N. C. Telephone 456-5227; Homes & Land of Haywood County; newspaper and Real Estate Weekly. 8. As necessary in accordance with State law. 12. From information received from source for available housing (No. 6), DSS housing will be available during relocation period. 14. Suitable business sites will be available during relocation period. Source same as for available housing (No. 6). NOTE: 1. A building under construction at corner of Woodland Drive and Main Street. 2. In reference to the Family Practice Center, there are no available buildings in the project area for rent or sale at this time. This may be a problem at the time of relocation if they are not owners of the subject property and have funds to rebuild. D-2 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement housing will be available prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of relocation: * Relocation Assistance, * Relocation Moving Payments, and * Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement. With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes, apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs. The Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost, or to lose a favorable financing arrangement (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or the Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are eligible and qualify, and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify. The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS- 133-5 through 133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose. The relocation officer will determine the needs of displace families, individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance advisory services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for negotiations and possession or replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and sanitary standards. The displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after the NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displaced persons will be offered in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial means of the families and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non- profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement property. D-3 All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing, (2) rental of replacement housing, either public or private, or (3) moving existing owner- occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location. The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit organizations and farm operations acquired for a highway project. Under the Replacement Program for Owners, the NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest expenses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement housing payments, increased payments, and incidental expenses may not exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort Housing provision. A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses, on the purchase of a replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the state determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250. It is the policy of the state that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state or federally-assisted construction projects unless and until comparable replacement housing has been offered or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as income for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act or any other federal law. Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the state so that decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided. Adequate replacement housing will be available for all relocatees. Last Resort housing will be considered if the financial situation of tenants or owners warrant such action. D-4 R-2210 A APPENDIX E CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP PRESS RELEASE AND CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP HANDOUT a NOTICE OF A CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PROPOSED WIDENING/IMPROVEMENTS OF US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF THE US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE Project 8.1942901 R-2210 Haywood County A citizens informational workshop will be held on Wednesday, May 8, 1996 in the Junaluska Elementary School Cafeteria located at 2301 Asheville Road near Waynesville. This will be an informal open-house workshop conducted between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Those wishing to attend may do so at their convenience during these hours. The purpose of this informational workshop is to present information, answer questions, and receive comments during the early design stages of the proposed widening/improvements of US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits to north of the US 19-23-74 interchange. The project proposes to widen the existing roadway to multi-lanes. Representatives of the Department of Transportation will be available to discuss the proposed project with those attending. Anyone desiring additional information about the- workshop may contact Mr. Michael Paylor, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Planning and Environmental Branch, P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611 or by telephone at (919) 733-7844 - Extension 231. NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to participate in the workshop. To receive special services, please call Mr. Paylor at the above number to give adequate notice prior to the date of the workshop. a E-1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Planning and Environmental Branch R US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 HAYWOOD COUNTY T.I.P. NUMBER R-2210 MAY 8, 1996 Citizens Informational Workshop w E-2 CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 ' WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STP-2313(1) STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1942901 Purpose of the Citizens Informational Workshop The purpose of the citizens informational workshop is to involve the public in the project planning process. If you have comments or suggestions about the proposed improvements described in this handout, please let a representative of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) know. A comment sheet is provided for you to write your questions or concerns so that we can keep a record of and fully consider your ideas, comments, and suggestions. The NCDOT realizes individuals living close to a proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the project on their homes and businesses. However, exact information is not available at this stage of the planning process. Additional design work is necessary before the actual right-of-way limits can be established. More detailed information will be available at a later date. Written comments on this project may be left with NCDOT representatives at the" citizens informational workshop or submitted through the mail. If additional information is needed or you would like to submit comments after the citizens informational workshop, please address your requests and comments to: Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 A summary regarding NCDOT's public involvement and project planning process is attached for your information. Description and Purpose of the Project The North Carolina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) 1996-2002 w Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) proposes to widen and improve US 23 Business to a multi-lane facility from the Waynesville City Limits to north of US 19-23-74; some ramp realignment at the US 19-23-74 interchange is included in the proposal (see attached Figure 1). It is anticipated that approximately 100 feet of right of way will be needed to accommodate the improvements to US 23 Business. The length of E-3 the proposed project is approximately 2.3 miles. The purpose of the project is to provide a safer facility that allows expedient traffic flow for motorists in the area. Project Schedule and Cost The schedule for right-of-way acquisition and construction of US 23 Business, as well as current cost estimates based on preliminary design, are summarized below: PROJECT SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST PROJECT STAGE PROGRAM SCHEDULE CURRENT COST RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FY 1998 $ 2,200,000 CONSTRUCTION FY 2000 $ 5,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 7,300,000 Current Status Currently, planning and environmental studies for the improvements to US 23 Business are in progress. The environmental assessment is scheduled to be completed in September, 1996. A public hearing for the project is anticipated in the winter of 1997. The improvements currently under study are described below. Proposed Improvements The NCDOT proposes to widen existing US 23 Business to a five-lane, curb and gutter roadway from the Waynesville City Limits to the vicinity of SR 1267 (see Figure 1). The proposed roadway section is shown in Figure 2. Improvements to the existing roadway, including resurfacing, are proposed from SR 1267 to north of the US 19-23-74 interchange; additionally, some ramp realignments are proposed at the US-19-23-74 interchange. The provision of pedestrian facilities along US 23 Business is also being evaluated. Anticipated Right-of-Way Impacts 4 The proposed widening of US 23 Business will require approximately 100 feet of right-of-way width and may necessitate the relocation of residences in some areas along 10 the project. However, until both environmental studies and preliminary designs are completed, specific right-of-way impacts to individual properties cannot be determined. Anticipated impacts to individual properties will be presented at the public hearing, tentatively scheduled for the winter of 1997. E-4 I - r. •? Mount ^ ? •UMrdl Sel! ` t PARK- 6 . C !reek l ` _ • r CreDtrte' r? 1 0. 06 7 / / • )4 ? wee' aY? / t w?oarod • / • VPI A. to HAYWOOD COUNTY SunDws 1)6 00010 1 • 17 , NAT ? O 1 ?? N 1 ? ? WAMESULLE QUAD 1 ? uu LAKE l 1?z! io taa oo ij 1 i s JU'vA?U loki lf22 1Y!L) 1S]i ? ':° Jvwluik• 271 IM = PROJECT . ? °? 1714 1 Im A BEGIN PROJECT POP. 6,765 \36 Im NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF __ • , ,s Uopol TRANSPORTATION UK ^ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS a A? PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 1e ?? 1111 '° » ps., BRANCH es 1111 US 23 BUSINESS im 1W FROM WAYNESITLLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE uu ' HAYWOOD COUNTY a t TIP NO. R-2210 Ll¢ 0 KILOMETERS 0.6 0 MILE 0.6 FIG. 1 Z O CJ) f!1 U LU Z W C/) C/) :D J < co co N N N W Z O U- O ~ 6 Z CW^/ / O 0 W 2 W` / p ?'- LL a U- 0 F- C7 ¢ 0 O_ O C9 VJ m ¢ D U LL O w U O w Q LL 2 O T ? ^ 2 sr ao ? N T ? N O N ? v " M I T 4 M T T Cl CV) M " cM*i I' --+ O N O A k, v CD N p w 14 cn g O ¢ a. LJJ 1 Q m ?r W p ~ U) Op a z o Q a m ¢ U 2 O Z a o U ? N Q) Z ¢ W O Z W Q W N w p } ?= Z a W w p m > ? I,- w O a = X O ¢ J Z_ ~ Q ¢ W T IL Vn / O c0 W F- U) w w z = J U3 F- W J m O F- ¢ M N Z O O F- w p w V) p P: Q F- LL p W D U U = U) O 00 Z 0 O m O LL ¢ w O Z Q Q w tO a m z F- W D ¢ Z w Cl Lo o o LL L a O W ¢ L fn U) LL Q F- F- p w U ? ?p o O cc: z " d w Om \ ¢ d COMMENT SHEET PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO US 23 BUSINESS FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO NORTH OF THE US 19-23-74 INTERCHANGE WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 r MAY 8, 1996 (You do not have to answer all the questions on these sheets, but please take the time to qive us your comments and concerns regarding this project. Please continue any responses on the back of this sheet.) NAME: ADDRESS: COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND/OR QUESTIONS REGARDING PROJECT R-2210: I a WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONF TO THE QUESTIONS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES. WAS THE PROJECT ADEQUATELY EXPLAINED TO YOU? WERE NCDOT REPRESENTATIVES UNDERSTANDABLE AND CLEAR IN THEIR EXPLANATIONS? PLEASE EXPLAIN. WERE DISPLAY MAPS EASY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND? EXPLAIN. PLEASE WERE NCDOT REPRESENTATIVES COURTEOUS AND HELPFUL? PLEASE EXPLAIN. HOW MIGHT WE BETTER PRESENT PROPOSED PROJECTS AND ADDRESS CITIZEN'S CONCERNS IN FUTURE INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOPS? HOW DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THIS MEETING TODAY? DO YOU FEEL THE MEETING WAS ADEQUATELY PUBLICIZED? PLEASE EXPLAIN. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS: THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS RELATE TO TRANSPORTATION IN YOUR AREA AND NORTH CAROLINA IN GENERAL. WHAT IS YOUR AREA'S MOST PRESSING TRANSPORTATION NEED? E WHAT IS NORTH CAROLINA'S MOST PRESSING TRANSPORTATION NEED? HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONDITION OF THE ROADS IN YOUR AREA? GOOD FAIR POOR WHY? WHAT ROAD IN YOUR AREA NEEDS THE MOST IMPROVEMENT? WHY? HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONDITION OF THE ROADS IN NORTH CAROLINA? GOOD FAIR POOR WHY? WHAT ROAD IN NORTH CAROLINA NEEDS THE MOST IMPROVEMENT? WHY? DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS REGARDING ANY TRANSPORTATION RELATED SUBJECT? Additional comments can be sent to Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager of the Planning and Environmental Branch, North Carolina Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611. E-7 O? W A r?9QG o ? Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Water Quality September 6, 2001 Haywood County DWQ Project No. 010409 US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy.) from Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 F.A. Project STP-23B(1), State Project 8.1942901 TIP Project No. R-2210A APPROVAL of §401 Water Quality Certification with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Gilmore: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to permanently impact 1,466.16 linear feet of jurisdictional streams resulting in a total of 0.26 acres of surface water impacts to Raccoon Creek and its unnamed tributary in order to construct the widening of US 23B (Old Asheville Highway) from the Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) in Haywood County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated 9 March 2001 (received 20 March 2001) and additional information provided on 30 August 2001. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 3289 corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Number 14. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non- Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying §404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if stream impacts exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. 1. In-stream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot trout buffer zone are prohibited from January 1 through April 15 at culvert construction sites 2, 3, and 4 on Raccoon Creek to protect the egg and fry stages of trout from off-site sedimentation during construction. All stream relocation and restoration work shall be performed outside the moratorium period as well. 2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B .0024) must be implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ downstream aquatic resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground-disturbing activities to provide long term erosion control. If work is to be performed during winter months, erosion control matting shall be used around all stream crossings and adjacent to streams. 3. All in-stream work shall be performed during low flow conditions. 4. New stream channels shall be constructed in the dry and stabilized prior to turning water into them. 5. Storm water shall be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water sheet flow. 6. No live concrete shall come into contact with surface waters until it has hardened. 7. All mechanized equipment used near or in surface waters shall be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of waters from fuel lubricants, hydraulic fuels, or other toxic materials. 8. The presence of mechanical equipment in stream channels shall be minimized. 9. All culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel shall not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert extensions. Culverts shall be installed one foot below the stream to allow for movement of fish and other aquatic life. 10. Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rather, native vegetation consisting of Orchard grass, switchgrass, and Ladino clover in the riparian areas is to be planted. Plantings by live staking shall include: willow, red-osier dogwood, silky dogwood, buttonbush, hazel alder, and rough-leaved dogwood as specified in NCDOT's final design plans. If necessary, rip-rap must be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark, and vegetation must be used for stabilization above high water. 11. Rock silt screens at culvert outlets shall be removed at project completion. 12. Any impacts to waters or wetlands associated with waste or borrow pits from this project may require additional mitigation and will be the responsibility of NCDOT. 13. The 1,466.16 linear feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for at a ratio of 1:1.3 by providing 1,902.40 linear feet of on-site stream relocation/restoration using natural channel design. The stream relocation shall be built and maintained according to the approved plans before any mitigation credit is given. If this Office determines that the stream restoration or associated riparian area has become unstable, the stream shall be repaired or stabilized using only natural channel design techniques if possible. Additionally, the vegetation in the riparian shall be maintained and/or replaced according to the approved plans. Rip-rap and other hard structures may only be used if required by the Division of Land Resources or a Delegated Local Program. Additionally, all repair designs must be submitted to and receive written approval from this Office before the repair work is performed. Because the restored stream is proposed as compensatory mitigation for stream impacts, the restored portion and associated riparian area shall be preserved in perpetuity through a preservation easement or some other legally binding mechanism or agreement. The above easement or other legally binding mechanism or agreement must be in place before any mitigation credit shall be given. Additionally, the stream physical and biological monitoring plan shall be followed and reports shall be submitted to this Office after the first year and every other year afterwards for a total of five (5) years. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0500, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h). Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-9646 or Mr. Michael R. Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.251.6208 x256. Attachment Pc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office NCDWQ Asheville Regional Office Central Files File Copy Y, y J. Thorpe, P Director State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources FILE COPY Asheville Regional Office Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION June 8, 2001. Ms. Alice Gordon N.C. Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Review of U.S. 23B Project TIP No. R-2210 A DWQ Project 01-0409 Haywood County Dear Ms. Gordon: I have reviewed the application for 401 Water Quality Certification for the project and am requesting the following additional information: 1. Site #1-Stream relocation of unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. Additional stream design data is needed before the review can be completed. There was no reference data provided and the proposed relocation design data is not adequate. A reference reach stream should be located and the proposed stream relocation designed in accordance with the data obtained from that stream reach. 2. Sites #3 and #5-Stream Relocation of Raccoon Creek. It is my understanding that the design of this stream segment was based on data from the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute using the Piedmont regional curve. Since data is also available for the mountains it is recommended that the Mountain regional curve be used for design on Raccoon Creek. This project is being placed on hold until we have received, reviewed and approved these design features. 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone 828/251-6208 FAX 828/251-6452 An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper Ms. Alice Gordon June 8, 2001 Page Two Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have questions, please call me at 828-251-6208. Sincerely, D Michael R. Parker Environmental Chemist xc: Randy Henegar, DOT Hydraulics Unit Mark Davis, DOT 14th Division R. G. Watson, P.E. Division Engineer Steve Lund, COE Owen Anderson, WRC Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ Keith Haynes 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone 828/251-6208 FAX 828/251-6452 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper F WAIF Q 9 Michael F. Easley \Q? pG Governor Vj r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources p `C Kerr T. Stevens Division of Water Quality May 15, 2001 Haywood County DWQ Project No. 01-0409 William D. Gilmore Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC, 27699-1548 Re: Haywood County, US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801; T.I.P. No. R-2210A Dear Mr. Gilmore: On March 20, 2001, the NC Division of Water Quality received your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the referenced project. This application has been forwarded to Mr. Mike Parker of the DWQ Asheville Regional Office. Mr. Parker has determined that additional maps and site plans will be required in order to complete his field review of the project. Mr. Parker has been in contact with Ms. Alice Gordon of your staff, and we understand that these supplemental drawings are forthcoming. In the meantime, please note that until this information is received, this project will be placed on hold for processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)). I will also request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold. Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact me at (919) 733-1786. Sincerel cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Mike Parker, Mooresville DWQ Regional Office File Copy Central Files 010409 North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) n- moo .-roc 1-1--- I non 10a -1 - ,, I.-""- - ,....•,...,...,, i..,....,.a,.-I { FILE COPY 16TAIT 0 1 04 09 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICI IAEt. F. EASLE:Y GOVERNOR March 9, 2001 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 143 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Lund NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sir: Subject: Haywood County, US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits (Marshall St/Woodland Dr) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd), Federal Aid Project STP-23B (1), State Project No. 81942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210 A. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen and improve US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive, at the Waynesville City limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road. The project is approximately 2.2 miles in length. The proposed typical section for the segment of US 23B from Marshall Street to Ratcliff Cove Road is a three-lane curb and gutter section, including a center turn lane. A roundabout will be constructed at Ratcliff Cove Road (SR 1818). From Ratcliff Cove Road to Frances Farm Road (SR 1802), a four-lane curb and gutter, median-divided section is proposed. From Francis Farm Road to 360 feet north of East Howell Mill Road (SR 1196), a five-lane curb and gutter section (including a center turn lane) is proposed. From 360 feet north of East Howell Mill Road to 115 feet south of Industrial Park Drive (SR 1267), a four- lane curb and gutter, median-divided facility is proposed, including a median break approximately 380 meters (125 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road. From 115 feet south of Industrial Park Drive to 1312 feet north of Industrial Park Drive, a five-lane curb and gutter section with a center turn lane is proposed. At this point the existing 4-lane undivided facility will be resurfaced to the northern project terminus. The project will not impact any Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in the list of study rivers (Public Law 90-542, as amended). There are no jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the project. This project is in hydrological Unit 06010106. Summary of Impacts: There are no wetland impacts. There will be a total of 1,466.16 feet of jurisdictional streams affected. This will result in a total of 0.26 acres of surface water impacts at four sites as depicted on Sheet 24 of 24. Site 1 will impact an unnamed tributary of Raccoon Creek. All of the other sites will impact Raccoon Creek (DWQ Index No. 5-16-14). LYNDO TIPPETT SECRETARY P'm? 2 0 2_uu Summary of Mitigation: We will provide 1,902.40 linear feet of onsite stream relocation/restoration using natural channel design at a ratio of 1:1.3. MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC rTi - rrn NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS An Environmental Assessment (EA) was submitted by the NCDOT in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The EA was approved on July 28, 1997. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was approved on July 29, 1999. The EA explains the purpose and need for the project; provides a description of the alternatives considered; and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects. After the EA was approved it was circulated to federal state and local agencies. Copies of the EA and FONSI have been provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request. R-2210A is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111 (f) which lists the FHWA characteristics of' independent utility of a project: (I) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope; (2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation improvements are made in the area; (3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements. RESOURCE STATUS Wetland delineations: Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area, however four jurisdictional surface water sites were observed. (1) Site 1 is a small, unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The stream is located approximately 610 m (2000 ft) north of where US 23 Business crosses over Raccoon Creek. It is 2.5 feet wide and 1.0 inches in depth and has a substrate composed of sand and silt. Water flow is characteristically low with no aquatic vegetation. (2) Sites 2, 3 and 4 are all located on Raccoon Creek (DWQ Index 5-16-14). At US 23 Business the creek is 15 feet wide with an average depth of 1.0 feet. The substrate is composed of boulder, rubble, gravel and sand. Water clarity is excellent and no submerged aquatic vegetation was observed. At Site 3 a stream survey was conducted on December 11, 2000 by the WRC and NCDOT to determine the species composition along Raccoon Creek and to determine the potential for stream mitigation. Site 3 is located approximately 2,400 linear feet upstream of the confluence of Raccoon Creek and Richland Creek adjacent to US 23B, behind Haywood Christian Ministries. The site sampling began behind the Haywood Christian Ministries and proceeded upstream approximately 100 meters to the existing RCBC under US23B. This section of the stream is entrenched and has fair/good habitat consisting of boulders, rubble, gravel, and sand with a good pool to riffle ratio. Riparian vegetation consists of hardwoods with fairly stable streambanks. The water temperature was 6.5 degrees C (43.7 degrees F). The species captured were rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus nrykiss), brown trout (Salmo trutta), blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus), longnose dace (R. cataractae), northern hogsucker (Hvpenielium nigricans), and others. Immediately downstream of Site 3 the creek was channelized, lacked any riparian woody vegetation, and was mowed to the waters edge for a distance of approximately 600 feet. We identified this site as an excellent candidate to qualify as on-site stream restoration. The construction of the highway project will not affect this channelized reach. Following inspection of the site during a field review in November 2000, we acquired the site and redesigned this reach of Raccoon Creek using natural channel design procedures (Sheets 10 and 16 to 21 of 24). It is presented in this application as site 5 and is to act as on-site mitigation for project impacts. I'ABLE 1. IMPACTS ON R-2210A Site Station Structure Stream Impacts (ft) Stream and DWQ Index Number 1 16+71 - 19+34-L- NA 935 UT to Raccoon Creek 2 10+64.1-Y7- RCBC 23 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 3 28+29.4-1,- RCBC 436 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 4 11+14.7-YI I- RCBC 72 Raccoon Creek 5-16-14 TOTAL 1466 Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of December 20, 1999, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) lists seven federally protected species for Haywood County (Table 2). Table 2. Federally Protected Species for Haywood County SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Microhexura montiva a Spruce-fir moss spider E Clemm s muhlenber i bog turtle T S/A Alasmidonta raveneliana Appalachian elktoe E* Felis concolor cougar eastern cougar E Glaucom s sabrinus coloralus Carolina northern flying squirrel E Haliaeelus leucoce halus bald eagle T G mnoderma lineare rock gnome lichen E Lsotria meloides small whorled ogonia T "E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range). "T" denotes Threatened (a species likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. T(S/A) -Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. *Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago. A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for the bog turtle, the bald eagle, the rock gnome lichen, the small whorled pogonia, the eastern cougar, the Appalachian elktoe, the spruce-fir moss spider, and the Carolina northern flying squirrel because there was no suitable habitat present. A letter of concurrence from the Service has been requested and is expected to be issued shortly. CULTURAL RESOURCES Archaeology: Archaeological resource survey work was conducted to determine if significant archaeological resources might be disturbed. No sites were assessed as potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. In a letter dated March 14, 1996, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with this recommendation and a copy is located in the EA (page A-10). Historic: The project site was surveyed by an NCDOT architectural historian and one structure, the Miller- Francis House (HW 81) was found to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C. In a letter dated October 31, 1996, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with a "No Adverse Effect" status for the property as long as Alternate 2, as defined on the Concurrence Form, is followed. This recommendation and a copy is located in the EA (pages A-7 and A-8). MITIGATION OPTIONS The Corps of Engineers had adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the Waters of the United States. Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) and Department of Transportation Order 5660.1 A (Preservation of the Nations Wetlands), emphasize protection of the functions and values provided by wetlands. AVOIDANCE: No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters. MINIMIZATION: Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts. Minimization techniques were implemented as follows: 1. Slopes: Fill slopes adjacent to jurisdictional surface waters are at a 2:1 ratio. 2. Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters will be enforced. 3. Clearing: Clearing Method 11 will be used. 4. Culverts: Culverts at site 2 (Station 10+60 to 10+70, Sheets 7 and 8 of 24), Site 3 (Station 28+29, Sheets 9 and 17 of 24), and Site 4 (Station I 1+14 -Y I I -, Sheets 19 and 20 of 24) were designed using low flow channel design. The December 11, 2000 stream survey of Raccoon Creek at about Station 29+50 by the WRC and NCDOT resulted in the capture of rainbow trout and brown trout. As a result of this survey the design of the culverts on the entire project was revised. The revised design will to ensure that a low flow system that would enhance trout habitat is established. COMPENSATION: As previously mentioned, we have acquired a stream mitigation site located adjacent to the highway project. The site is labeled Site 5 and is located immediately downstream of Site 3. At that point, the creek exits the riparian wooded system and becomes a channelized stream with no pool and riffle geometry and lacking riparian woody vegetation. It is mowed to the water's edge for a distance of approximately 600 feet. The construction of the highway project will not affect this channelized reach. Following the site visit in November 2000 by NCDOT biologists, the NCDOT acquired the site and redesigned this stretch of creek using natural channel design procedures. It is presented in this application as site 5 (Sheets 10 and 16 to 21 of 24) and is to act as partial on-site mitigation for project impacts. The design of stream mitigation sites generally requires that a 50-foot buffer on both sides of the creek be established where topographically possible. We were not able to provide this amount of buffer on all sections of the stream relocation (Sites I and 5). The impacts from the project are 1,466 linear feet. We are providing 1,902 feet of mitigation at sites 1 and 5. This is 436 feet more mitigation than would normally be needed at a ratio of 1:1. We are offering this additional 436 feet of mitigation at Site 5 as compensation for the reduced buffer. In addition, on Site 5 we will provide woody vegetation between the top of bank and the western edge of the PDE as depicted on Sheet 10 of 24. Thus, we will provide 1,902 linear feet of onsite stream mitigation using natural channel design at a ratio of 1:1.3. This mitigation consists of 1105 linear feet of stream relocation at sites l and 3; and 797 linear feet of stream restoration at site 5. The design of these stream segments is depicted on Sheets 4 to 6 of 24 and Sheets 9 to 15 of 24. The design incorporates low flow culvert design with baffles as depicted on the attached drawings. REGULATORY APPROVALS This project will take place in a mountain trout county. Thus we anticipate that comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of' Engineers. Application is hereby made fora Department of the Army Nationwide 14 Permit as required for the above- described activities. We are also hereby requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we have enclosed a check for $475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application. We are providing seven copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review. If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon at (919) 733- 7844 extension 288. Sincerely, -'William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager / Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch cc: w/attachment Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS, Asheville Mr. Owen Anderson, WRC, Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E. Program Development Branch Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics Unit Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design Unit Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit Mr. R. G. Watson, P.E., Division 14 Engineer DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID: NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NA"JONWIDE PERMI'T' 4) : 14 PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE: 1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS 2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION 3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT. 1. OWNERS NAME: N.C. Dept. of Transportation; Project Development and Environmental Analvsis Branch 2. MAILING ADDRESS: 1548 Mail Service Center CITY: Raleigh SUBDIVISION NAME: STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27699-1548 PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): 3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): (WORK): 919-733-3141 4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager 5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): COUNTY: Haywood NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Waynesville 1 SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): US 23B (Old Asheville Hwy) from Waynesville City Limits arshall St/Woodland Dr) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd), 6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: RIVER BASIN: French Broad Raccoon Creek 7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, EXPLAIN: Trout found in stream during sampling; in December 2000 /0. 1J '1'HL YKUJ?UT LUUATEU WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[x] 7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION? 8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION): 8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: 9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 0 2 10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY: FILLING: EXCAVATION: FLOODING: OTHER: DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0 10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION): SEE PERMIT DRAWINGS AND COVER LETTER LENGTH BEFORE: 1,466 FT AFTER: 1,902 FT WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): various FT WIDTH AFTER: various FT AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: various FT AFTER: various FT (2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: x PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: x CHANNEL EXCAVATION: x CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: OTHER: Stream Mitigation site. 11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? na WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? 12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY): See Cover Letter 13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Public Transportation 3 14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT TIIIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. (:INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS): NA 17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND? YES [x] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18) a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT? YES [x] NO [] b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE? YES [x] NO [] IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE (919) 733-6369. 4 18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS: a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT. b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY PROJECT. C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED. e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE. NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO: 1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, 2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND 3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE DATE (AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.)) 5 V J-L C11 .L IN ? TY 1" Ll AJ-l SITE Day 81 11 Y i ow r, F agm ' eatc I; I Ta/ w,to m"I ` Ed 0S 1 + East Fla Rw ,' la N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWA A-S HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1912901 (R-2210A) LTS 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS To sit 1801 [mot ii'rT 7 ?i• l T . •. --WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND ??W L DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES FILL SURFACE WATER R (POND) DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND • • DENOTES MECHANIZED • CLEARING <- ?- FLOW DIRECTION TB -- TOP OF BANK WE - - EDGE OF WATER C- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL -- L . PROP. RIGHT OF WAY - - NG- - NATURAL GROUND - - 11L - • PROPERTY LINE -TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - _ 0- _ _ - WATER SURFACE X X X LIVE STAKES X X BOULDER 5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER LEGEND PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED BOX CULVERT PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT (DASHED LINES DENOTE EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 0 SINGLE TREE WOODS LINE ¦ DRAINAGE INLET ROOTAAD VORTEX ROCK WEIR 00000 RIP RAP RIP RAP ENERGY N. C. DEPT. OF TR NSPORTATiON HAYWOOD COUNTY DVISSIANEPATOR BASIN SHEET 2 OF Z2- 10-15-99 SITE A EAGLENEST MTN.ti l i 23 WAYNESVILLE 74 BEGI t? PROJE DeN wood 19 276 1 I r ? 276 SIT Juno r SITE 2 SITE I 23 ? 1 _ 23 Q3 PROJECT 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WA I N ES MLLE Ci'r l' LLNUTS TO SR 1801 o I 6/ a I ? l ? a I I aaa ° I I .?I .f © p °II 91 I ALJ I I I I_l^? II I I? LI I ? II o ? o ,o I Y I_ . - U o 0 ? v I O T II p I I ? p I ° a? i ? I I i I I I I I 1 I I I i I b a m F c a tr] U a a 5 z 0 0 z m 0 U Ln N O N- ?S i . E E Q ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE 0 STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 22HA (0.08 Mlz) CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 2% BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 2 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.12 M BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE kf 0.24 Mz WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO kf /d bkf) 12 Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.2 M WIDTH Flood-Prone Area f 3.2 M ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 1.6 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 8 MM SINUOSITY (K) 1.1 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH 30 M AVG. AMPLITUDE 8 M AVG. RADIUS 19 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 0.23 CMS 02 1.0 C M S 050 2.0 CMS VELOCITY: \r DA.nivF1 11 1 (l q4 M/S V2 V50 CLASSIFICATION 1.77 M/S B5 EXISTING STREAM IS AN EXCAVATED DITCH AND WAS NOT USED AS A REFERENCE C) REFERENCED "APPLIED RIVER MORPHOLOGY" BY DAVE ROS(7Fi l ST REAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE I N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION [DIVISION OF HIGHWAY'S HA` WOOD COUNTY PROJECT: (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVII,I.E CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET _0_OF iZ 10/15999 s N F s ? z e e 0 a e jg2 ail. N Z O ? W W V V) 0 Q ? v a r Z O W N M E J O v ? a a 5 3 3 at I i E 7 O \ ! v: ! y? r o ! Y V Xp? ul U -' N F p ? ? z?y O O z a ?? f° J F ( . j V ? d ! 7 z O i cn M R ? F O C? 'S O O (, I ?'O O N 1 O ad O [" ?, 1 F ZO U C c W O z U G CL- 1 / 1 / o 10+40 1 v CO w C l1 C / `C _ , I / L V F ? w ? C o S 00 v o I co / N z W RACCOON GREEK / ' I " I' Z f I I I I t', r', v? I w I I o Cj ° a a o _u n+00 U C67 O 0 _1 Z o ° o (A oa rl- O ,t, G.: F" C 1 0 H o o 0 ? - 06 ado o z F C= , o w ? ?z 00 o ? J U Ca ? ? W J W z o z Q W CO U J (-D Z v ti LL Z Z Q N U F- V) _ U X Z J X W Ln V) (Pi O O Nr? ? W O \ I Iz 7 Q / W C) w J I L i -- Q Q C2 ? L O Z LL O I Z J W C) 2? / a CIO :] F-- Z Z O W D B - 'f C C Z W < ,? Q ?O J Z = W J J -LLJU NJQ r: a o °~ r O ~ Q T O J W WJW > Z O ° OHO UW cl? QJ z L? Li WSJ Oln(D WWQ !- JZ?=??a ? N LL O WW F-OWJCC H-QLLQ_>WO Z r r O O m Q ao °? MATCH LINE SHo 10 z Q a d i d 'L r'" CV o w.r 6 o cn Of" ~ f tea. I III ? c? oo.°;?w?' „? ± d z 0 F' 0 W;i l \ f I I I I ° > r4,w I Vu L W > O ;f• \ ? m m I ? m J? U I\ - 25? I I _w - _ U Ca C. V w pow < - - _ _ (S? To > rM Z t; r3 Od Y w > _ I I ^ ?_ _ JOSEPH O. LINER 13 ANNA ST W RT k -?- _asr ---- ? SSE H 0. LINER u rtiw / Q I? I I I 0 W z ^ \ I i z w '?L\L--- - -- I I I \? o g \?\\ ? I I I r' I I I ? .a? F ?/ ??/ Ji ?w \ \1 t \ tiY I ? I ? GBH` f \ j a \ i t? i a r \I 1 I ?J rhJ h '?Y I I KW\ z w r * W z f'. I ?I Zv) " 40 -c ?I 1 f I i OZ I? ?a W I I I ?;4'; ? I ? ? I ? /IE 1 / cn ?. \ o ? ? o N eY m ? ? b '_ `QlOv? ? Y.?1 0 \ \ T ?i \ ? ? ? ? ? U C Ga U 01 ??\ I I ? ? ??ca?w ?cl a ti v? s' X, I II ®`? ? y A o ? w u_ g F? 1 - I I? It/ ?OS? ? ?z d =I QQ ? 1 I :III I )\ AA YH E I ox I I I x 1 oc) xW I i I _ - I I I 1 L-Li ;cc y/ ?.? ?` I Ix I I W J 1\ ?F--? o? r; ?Y I ZQ\ * I B 1 V, 41 ; 1 1 v+° `-. ml 1 1 ?? ? ? I x y ' 1 z W I I ? Z 4 II 11 ? I m - .:a I % ZI I I I qL, I j +-?I E Im S I / o 10 00 I ? Val _ x a Q- gp 20 - -? W a Z a / 0 00 as o I 1 1 1 3 C:? Cc w 0000 ?I m x u°? ? I I I 3 ..a A Z ^ i E 1 WI I a ? I i ZO ' I c? I 3 C/J \ I I ?I`I d ? I ?x l I 1 W I I G W w ? ? I I I I I" °' > 4 /, I I I? Iw I ' rs W ,' I ? I-I I ?,_?' f II LII III MATCH LINE SHo 09 DETQIE R00TWQD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 20'- 30' A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. r UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL ?'OC ?4-EL0 o ROOT _FA"N 30 0°-11, 3 0 a / - FOOTER LOG y FOOTER LOG (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT WAD LOGS (0.g6m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS - PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES l rSEE PLANTING PLAN FOR I STABILIZATION MEASURES BANKFULL- ELEVATION ( VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. ANCHOR ROCKS TO REST ?ON f'? TOP OF ROOT WAD. ---ROOT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. ROOT WADS - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SITE III AND V N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION i I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY I PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) L S 23 BtTISINESS FRODI WAYNESVILI,E CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 11 01. 22 02-12-01 w x U O CG W J Q U N O F- O 2 -r4 W ? a I ?f? 3 = J a ?\ a 0: 1 w o ?? Q J ? U Q I ?' r m 1 Q z D?J P I l a I F-- ' w r \ .r r z 0 o'. 1, F- a z? ? z U ;p v C, w c j F ?. U N ? ? o R z , ? O o U z o h x U ° ?. M d ? l W ? Y U 0 w H O o m m Ir W Z O U T W 0 J L? 2 3 c? Z = 01- 0 m Z O w O J Q ? cr E wa 7 J 1 Z 2 G i W ? Q] Y U } cJOJ J w ? F- OF Q n = X N O Ln O? KO? W ..owl OO F-X z (DNQ CD Q W v? b Q W d] J ? J d J 7 CD (D ::) Co T N M+ W A x V O O U z F POO ° C) a x w a? ? 0 --4 00 O+-6 d x v c° W V c? -p x 0' Lb C ° O b F U. p L 2o- D ° ° F U eMV cis ?? x o N r C/) (D C > Ev > 6 U o d W! N +- L=Y ? C ! a ? 004- 3 z In ° Ln c a C) C >1 Y } L L L E U) E x i- O Y a V (n O L L L a ° O ? U) Q W 21 0ofc o.- x c ao V z 3 O W O p L r- a •- o L CL a? z O 0 3 T m ' m ? V W 8 0 g?B O, ? 4di J ? C J y J h O Q s LLI 1 r ~I ` W V I a 8 Y'.o CJi m ?k a E E ? a a o od•q ? ° a ? 4 y,o N ? p? .a o a ? y. •?Q ,4 ti 3 E ..? e 0 Q r-?yrk 1 V a.. D ° °nq vUU? W cry .,,?4 n j ,1 ? W x U a x Q V x h W Q V N O H 0 z z O ? H Q V W W tY N N 0 W O O S NIrl O H- ? N _ " uV O N Z z d W Q W W ~ I)f W ? Q7 uQ = 0 tr N Q W W > F- Q O W Z J Mai l y b -i4l- u i i W J U 4 a 3 ? `1 N Z, /Q J 1 ? a m ? \ z a I` Of v 1 O 1 U LLJ z o 0 N _ V) I j w o o ? ? m a ? c. 0 II F-F U z 0 Q ? F" ? ? ? ? ? H W x O O H O O It CID 1 ? a z 1F O M U LLJ ` U? 3 O M o w ? J II O o pp = i Z 3 ? ? ca I 1 ' 3 O = J 0 CJ W \ - 0 J \ ? Z Z Q . \ 1 E LJ 9 z z -I a I \ W - i r mY _ V Y ° w Oa i N N 0 W Z V, h Q1 V) ?= pJ N0- a On cl? oWQ m WJZ ? ?00? = CO f- x N ZCID N < W z s O N ~ _ N 0 O y` F. er zoo ,? ? x U o O O Gz. O R. O O Z LAJ W t 13x G , O W o 6' U W x Cl) J Q V a r k 7F?9 t'??x'4? / ? / ?o yc? a O - SV hPti?r' ? V , Orw w N~w 1'' 1 1 NNW W-Z N Nx a LL v~a cr U ao w O o °o Y a J Z LL- Z b VZr 3 d O t Z O Q W ?- a y _Ew ?m° g m E E p Q U WWJ w ?a n xx ° a < Qo -i a 4' . O --co PO O w U W N g w ? o ?3 o N Z w -j o _ °w Q W O o f z a7) sa I V a 2, mow ?O W 7 3 U ,! ?- lL E LA Oad z33 Y V Y r - - - Y Q 4 OW. ^ cr L 1_ w T d J F °? T li cl? W : 3, VD w ?mMH a x a? o-? < 1 z = ?- E o L ? LLJ Dm~ w 0 CL 3 -? ? O D <I: 0 W +-- C mU ?z CD z I W T J QQ D m Jv d ? U Q U-) ? O CD b 7 U_ O o E Q ~ m 3 Ln 4- 0 O W w > ° LLJ a, Q Lw z mJ m 0 -1 1 J D p LL E Q? J zz J? _ J OC:? W CL F- Q D m m LL - -U u J O F-- Q z Q J z D D O m? 5- ?w? m Q C2 'D L 0 ?m Q - Q O z zLLY0? z O E~ F z z"0 X U F" O O O o Q U z 0 ca C ci c F? U L-1 ti O 0 cn c E? ? c cn U "? ca `n L-] ? z ? W x T N rn (D m co 00 to 00 v 00 Q V) J C F ry O a ? ? o w A R zwUS o O C? ??F w z U cl W O o -4 o c i z w 1 I o co 1 J J J V1 W Z I Z I I -i W x u J W z W p 1 C) w z = \ ( J O U U \ \ \ J p a 1= ? - \ w 0 a C) Ln 0 t] W x N W ` 0 Q u d w °' rz / O ? / Z z a w a / / co Z z p w W-z ?m a ' / L .: J Q F-o - Qr `? = WJJ Z --WV cnJa Q ? U V) : Qr I- - ao3 ° wl-Q z WJLL- > z O U J 1 OW >Q-i:: ZQ _ O o(I?O CAW O C, QJ LL- O(/)C' WWQ I- ,JZ? W? I- WJa? F-- Q LL- Q 0 > WO Op?OZyZp7? Z r ? L rn Co co 00 ? ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 23.2 KM2 23.2 KM2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 8.8 M 6 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.41 M 0.46 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf) 3.65 M 2 2.76 M 2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) 21.48 3.04 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FLOOD PRONE AREA (Wfpo) 18.9 M 14 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.1 2.1 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 MM SINUOSITY (K) 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 4.7 CMS 4.7 CMS 02 1Q.4 rMq 18.4 (-MS 050 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 1.28 M/S 1.1 m/s V2 2.0 M/S 1.8 M/ V50 2.4 M/S 2.5 M/S CLASSIFICATION B4C B4C * EXISTING STREAM IS REFERENCE STREAM STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE III AND V N. C. DEPT.OF 'T'RANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAY'S HAYWOOD COUNTY" PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAY"NESVILLE CITY" LIMITS TO SR 1801 02 SHEET 18 OF 22 -12-01 r z o cm O . ? Z U ?^ W U zw? O co '? -a C) z ?O >• U p?F O o ? v° a 3 F w z ?l ?of4o I m CID 0 C3 s - ,,CAM CREEK O i ` O I 0 f' y I' ii ?I m c 1 ° o I ? p I ? o ? i o V U O N O - L O co rn Cb a CD Q Q O ft, Q Lij 0 n J w :E o F-zz -z 0 w ?co w a Q J ~ ?O T Z - ? U -JJ N J Q Q °o Q? ?OF- ? < C) J Lu J ow ? >C:?? Dao 0?0 Q J UL Z m J o un o wwa F- Jz?=F-3:: Q LLI F-QLLQ?>w0 Z • • Qo 00 fl- C9 ?o x @J Ln 0 N M ,zzz- N 00 co z o Lli m I -' w I z z I = a I u I o 0 I Li J (n I -? O p ? O Z n J m J I ? I I m I I _J I ? I o J I ? O I -' I I C? z cn co 00 co r-- -- f`- ro (,o 10 z O O I..1 FB .7I' A ? N ? ,-r ~+ ? N O ? ? O n O c W U ago F o o p w o ci i : 0, > ?- w p U " v o W > p ;. ev U A ?" ? H w z w b Z Z Q ? b U C? z U) PLI X w N 00 I,- J ...a U Ca C) U ti Q w ? 0 N O O PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Asheville Pd. Haywood Elec. Corp. W c y r1 l s y i I I° f`1. C. 2 D l° c Haywood Services Corp. Inc. Wcy???vil 14g9 AShevil!e Rd. James and Nancy Francis Wcy,nesville, N.C. 28786 2225 Asheville Rd. Joe H Elise D Palmer Wcvnesville-, N.C. 237,% 22--,3 Asheville '=d. Haywood Co. Consolidated School System W c y n e S y i l l e, I. 2 8 7 25'0-D % shevllle ado Plemmons Plumbing and Heating W c 1= S v l e, N.C. ' 3 7 ? -- I W etch Fcrm William and Alice Gregory We fl-lesyille, N.C. 287,07-1-D IL Asheville Rd. Haywood Christian Ministry. Inc. We`/nesvllle, IiN.C. 2878,E 54I pecce Moue- i-? D:J David C. and Lynda B. Blevins . +?? C s v7; I e a ,?? TI P The Champion Paper and Fiber Co. ,- C-? HAWoob AbVA)ICM6PJT :F--JbArl0 / 14q injDusTe-jA L PAAk 'DR. WAYNESVi LL E /?DUSTRIAL PAR A! Ze70(a k ANC t AYA1f3viuLE- , N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT:8.19%2901 (R-:210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM W.-kYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 REv.OZ -sI - oi SHEET .2,1__ OF 'Z- 10/15,/99 0 c N c N Q Q < < LL LL fG 2 O J LL c N L Q ? Q Z Q 2 Q ? N m a ri m c ao Ci r? E o v o co ao N c L W U m rn ? r E N O N N ? U cc?' v a? n E N ? M N V - a o _ LL w Ever o a o o ~ 3 W O C a L O O O O y LL (n N M O C t p p S f? O O O O Z 0 0 0 0 LL ? u O c l0 Q Q Q Q Q c f U H Cn U c N o Q o? O L Q Z W a c C N O ? W _ - O lL c a cu c Q Q Q Q Q E L Z Z ? c m ° dL Q ? Q Z Q 1Z Q ? Q Z ILL Z rN o co Q N (n co 0 2 N Q Z x x ~ cn o 0 0 ?E co M m a 9 N N N Q Cf) J ? c O N } } H J 0 + O cn N C v + CO } I + CD CO O ? J O - Q U) . N O V N F-- O?O? W A T ?RQG r O 'C Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Water Quality DWQ Project No.: County: Aonlicant: Project Name: Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621.This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer.It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: Agent's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: If this project was designed by a Certified Professional I, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, ect.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. - Date W Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Wetlands/401 Unit: (919) 733-1786 Fax: (919) 733-6893 MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Non-Discharge Branch Regional Contact: Michael R_ Parker WO Supervisor: Forrest Westall Date: SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Name NCDOT - US 23B R-2210A Project Number 01 0409 Recvd From DOT Received Date 3/20/01 Recvd By Region Project Type highway Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.) Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME 14 Stream O YO N F- 5-16-14 F B r- 40,305. 11,466.00 1,466.0 _-7,'F-10Y, o N F- r-(--?'?r-'?- Mitigation Wetland MitigationType Type Acres Feet Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y I0 N Did you request more Info? QQ Y O N Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? QQ Y O N Is Mitigation required? QQ Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue QQ Issue/COnd O Deny Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 353030 Longitude (ddmmss) 825759 Comments: A. Stormwater should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. ,Z Downstream waters contain trout -Sediment and erosion control guidelines for trout may help reduce impacts here, t,3!All stream work shall be performed during low flow conditions. XNew stream channels shall be constructed in the dry and stabilized prior to turning water into them_ .,5_ No live concrete should come into contact with surface waters until it has hardened. -6.AI1 mechanized equipment used near or in surface waters should be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of waters from fuels lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. ,/7.The presence of mechanical equipment in stream channel must be minimized. County Haywood County2 Region Asheville cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 1 Facility Name NCDOT - US 23B R-2210A Project Number 01 0409 County Haywood Regional Contact: Michael R. Parker Date: Comments (continued from page 1): cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 2 R-2210A Haywood County Subject: R-2210A Haywood County Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:03:01 -0400 From: Alice Gordon <agordon@dot. state. nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: Mark Staley <mstaley@dot.state. nc.us> CC: Byron Moore <bgmoore @dot. state. nc. us>, Randy Turner <mrtumer@ dot. state.nc.us>, Cynthia VanDer Wiele <cynthia.vanderwiele@ncmail.net>, Mike Parker <Mike.Parker@ncmail.net> Mark, I believe that this is your project. If not, could you please forward this to the correct person - Thanks. The DWQ is nearly ready to issue the Section 401 permit. However, they would like to see two changes in the Planting Plan: 1. Please eliminate fescue and bluegrass in the riparian areas and use something more native. Mike Parker of the DWQ suggested canary grass or orchard grass. 2. Live Staking: The DWQ would like to see greater diversity. The existing plan calls for willow and 2 species of dogwood. Can you ad a few more native shrubby species such as buttonbush, etc. Mike said if we send him an e-mail quickly (he is going on a long vacation on Friday) he will get his approval to the Raleigh DWQ Central office and maybe the 401 can be issued this week. Let me know if you can make these changes and I will take care of transmitting our commitments to DWQ. Thanks for your help. Alice Gordon Alice Gordon <agordon@dot.state. nc.us> Envir. Spec. II Project Development & Environmental Analysis 1 of 1 8/27/014:25 PIv FILE COPY TO: Mr. Steve Lund, USACOE Asheville Field Office FROM: Maryellen Haggard, Regional Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program DATE: July 6, 2001 SUBJECT: Trout moratorium period for road improvements to US 23 Business from Waynesville City limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), Haywood County. TIP No. R-2210 A, State Project No. 81942901, Federal Aid Project STP-23B (1). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting to shorten the moratorium period for the US 23 Business road improvement project. Biologists on staff with the NCWRC have reviewed the proposed request. Both Brown and Rainbow Trout were found in Raccoon Creek during a sample taken in December 2000. The sizes of the fish collected indicate that natural reproduction is occurring in the creek. We will allow NCDOT to work under a shortened moratorium provided they adhere to the following conditions. 1. Instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zone are prohibited from January 1 through April 15 at culvert construction sites, 2, 3 and 4, on Raccoon Creek to protect the egg and fry stages of trout from off-site sedimentation during construction. 2. The onsite stream relocation and restoration that is serving as mitigation for the highway project will take place in Raccoon Creek. The new stream design should be constructed outside the moratorium period. 3. Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is disturbed and maintained until project completion. Because this project is going to be constructed in winter months when it is difficult to get vegetation to grow we suggest the use of erosion control matting around all stream crossings and adjacent to streams. M Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDWQ Alice N. Gordon, NCDOT Marella Buncick, USFWS m VICINITY MAP I F231 .,84 Nit Rao W, k P. 'r - % L; 'oooo L t b Wlni«ock B,Id r} 71 'if It 1' t?,F?,.. S.r}f 7 ask All \ of Drl I y;•y t r-* ini liekc j`3 i ???: , t 1SO Y P 19 / y MADISON q{/jJ Wdnul t } Mail H.11, Itirntn' ?Ito m4.Q ant« W rMe ?lw S Ctook ` 75 / -? •~ s?' 11 t +Mari IIl t 10 t riK a rdkrM rnt \I-. Ihn Klrn( ` rY{I 2~ 1 t { 11 $tock7rllla: E l I J 77 I r Warr«rdl?• ,y w G"'r ^ lralnlr!lr,7 akt Alm SITE .C.-+ B U N C., .? .r \ m t leaiu t Wood n tt• i I-N PARK Bluk. i ountaln; ar . t - C - elk " C(atfVs/i t i _ Sw,nn, - .I uen 1 ? !0 ;t• m fl \Ish ville _ S E ,u A O{ A3 , K 2 $rrwkemonl CMtept. .n_ _ 1 ` r m ,((la lkka 1 It m I ` \ V, Iltt { tl 71 :1 ` 1 iu r? :d uC a?iau to LooQi' - Grdt ?_ i...nl ISA }err?a uw?r snd CKlon -A ?n Cnirote If ?,.r...a son I 1J _ ?t wi roJ }. D T.: to lSkrl n^ ie.w tl Sr.A(d&I a 1 Arden fa ' nook PI DAFT t rr r 1 wrll,tt o Younul }rwtlanc Sri, .? Sunnursl -•S' ?\ AMII « Horst { r ? Ed e. It weefter NAT . u S O 'l - Gnen II [ d ./ t . Uetk 2 7 ?Cullo.,nu ` iS • T«.. oro e o.,r • 1 fist }Is I• Ger tc Ent Etoo u}tom,,, FOR dt1f50nvlllt Rock wefts k41?11 J A C` `` S S ••i0 I fa `mos, flat Rak ©; :i }uclate e ! V,coniaN. } •? btla pl `` - '? % :{ . t F<l? P.1 ant ow... ta. U v>..r Sal a +8rtrar 1. tle R"*' -_ I / forest Tuxedo 4r t{n I ?OREST I:,- t i TRANS:- ''NIA 2 Culleftlt T^o.o.^ Glenv It CnK h t?s' 1 \r I ?? ?i ?. 215 It Kk 4 Cnuf\i r to ! c? o a Uk aimGen } r - edar klgrnl a. ., N it C?inrKS 2 } to {a+er ''S r C,.urf He,d 2- t ut? J f t 2) to jnrau UY r t "I rdn` t"°d r.r / Hr,n Saop^, r R. y w s t v t ton Ac) seo awn - *\ R«k Lott and . { r M l ton H,.d ? l 2 °l alr t ?, I ,l'wi i'?t t' ,`t 1 3 Minot. r ?2S N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.19!2901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 A o8-!7-01 SHEET 1 OF .2A .-WL6 WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER (POND) ® DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND • DENOTES MECHANIZED • CLEARING -<-- FLOW DIRECTION TB TOP OF BANK -- WE - EDGE OF WATER ?- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL A L_I-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY - - NG- - NATURAL GROUND - -?L - - PROPERTY LINE -TOE- TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - - - - - WATER SURFACE XXXXX LIVE STAKES O BOULDER --- CORE FIBER ROLLS 50 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) LEGEND ?L ?I PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED BOX CULVERT PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT (DASHED LINES DENOTE EXISTNG STRUCTURES) C. ? SINGLE TREE WOODS LINE DRAINAGE INLET ROOTWAD VORTEX ROCK WEIR 0000 0 RIP RAP RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR BASIN VANE SITE MAP EAG1ENfE17 IN. WAYN ESVI LLE .7 27, BEGIN PROJECT I^ j`4 BLrz) 23 SITE -V S?TVS., PROJECT 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 5 OF t3. 10-15-99 s 276 V11 Junnoo u, rtr 3 II lfi 11( ------- -X a ox o aea = i b 1 "S? ? a 3 OI I MnY rDD. 9I -per I ` -- -- I k ? JII ®o b III„ 0 a L O I ?,{ JI-- EtI ? o? ?I?II ?? ?IjI,I? a2 9 ® ?- y.. I I a ? 2 EI ?Jsl L ? boa a.Lll a? I % ?Dbl(y I ; oyl I ff ? ? do EI I IC? ? o y a I -,Q?Q EI?I ae a Fi ?" +N h o I I ? °I? I yy ae _ JMJD N o R I v9 ? € ti ? •I All I ! ? _ ?' I I J CW ?D ] 1 S EEt Att) a "Vlai ? W ®I o ? II Vie ?e l 0 4] ? ? ? ? ? O Y w.mo. mT I Q ® Il 4 II Q'?1 f7 a o fd I ? o ? I? p ?jy? I l •? 1 it 3 /I ?I i a I I c I I I I? F r-. F C`1 O ?; zp? ? F ® cn ?.. U? rn z U O A", 0 C, - a a ? w ? z o -1 o C .4 Z o z s P W V a Zed I ? \ g I ?? I 1 1 z F a U z A Wn W U In- N L? _t N N d u J W 3 E r ? q o o v J ..L ar k a N Z O H W U W X N o a Y U_ n. F- a? z m? F Ln 1 0 S 1- z z "o = Q ?? " • U wU E O Q o' Ha tti 0 a o LI) yz w U ° ° a vii z 5 3 E a E 6 ivy r^u ?d r S3` A ?Y18 Y Z 0 f- U .+ W ? NX J " ap U_ iL N H by ¦ .t ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE 0 STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME WOLF CREEK RACCOON CREEK TRIB, DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 67ha. (0.26mi?) 22HA (0.08 MIZ) CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 2.5 % 2.37 BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 1.6 m 1.5 m MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.03 m 0.2 m BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE 0.48 mz 0.27 m2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO k 5.3 7.5 Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.34 m 0.3 m WIDTH Flood-Prone Area f e 3.2 m 2.1 m ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 2.0 1.4 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 150 mm 8 mm SINUOSITY (K) 1.1 1.1 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH 22 m 30 m AVG. AMPLITUDE 4.5 m 8 m AVC. RADIUS 2.0 m 12 m DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 0.52 cros 0.32 cros 02 1.1 cros 0.9 cros 010 2.0 cros 1.7 cros VELOCITY: V. BANKFULL 1.3 m/s 1.3 m/s V2 1.6 m/s 1.5 m/s VIO 1.9 m/s 1.77 m/s CLASSIFICATION B4 B5 EXISTING STREAM IS AN EXCAVATED DITCH AND WAS NOT USED AS A REFERENCE REFERENCE LOCATED BETWEEN STECOAH AND ALMOND IN SWAIN CO. ADJACENT TO N.C. 28 STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE I J a- F 0 o r 0° v o F 0 I 0 u 10+40 m r N x Z 0 n ti 0 RACCOON CREEK / I ? co I I I J d 11+00 W ?r V ? l ? 1 c i 1 o co s: cn O O A a U ? z 1 i ? i o F- A / w / b h I ? k NN / / f y V h l a ? J x O U I? N ow U Q I l 00 O o 0 ? N I ' mo Q O 2 U Y W W O ? H V C32 -O ? O " U U a CL U w N z a LG w 0 z w Q N W U Ln cD m Q N m CT) D m pp OZ) z O o0 ? p rn o [ Z x U vn U o, O d O o c '.4 O E"' p w O E-? ? W > w W M- 4 > x o ?z 00 ca A J U ? W J z Z N Q o Cl) C) U J L.Li I LL U Z Z Z ti N CD O F- (n Q = U X Z J w 0 Ln w ? ? O t NM O V Q ? w J ! LLJ Q w ! ! w n m R U / J C) I Z LL- O ! llf 1 z Q J U O w Q ! co .a F--ZZ O-w w-Z soo < ! ! u W .? < ?O -J ZwU N u Q< < _0 L- z LL z o J N U :>: w F X0 ?a° Xo (.)w Q 0 J ?Z O `x w > ? Li n J ocnO wwQ _F- JZ?=F-tea CV wLL„ F-OwJ? F-QLLQ->w0 OmOZ 3:ZCOLL Z O O Oi N 00 co ]]Nl? H3iVN ® a 'OIL 16 00 Uo°.WV? 0f O I 2??a ?x rs.A?z E- Oq???`n Gs, I I I Gz. O ,.? O o ` ?s I I " Nm p 009 w x f3 ? Z ? \, v W ?' JO PH D. ll. ANNA STEWART A _ \ a _ N 67Y u I I i .. U mm vLs? lJ57 o cr. LINER 0.0 J ? ? I? f' I I 13 ? u? U ?,? V `, I I I I: \ M` a a 1 ?? \ ) o? 63 La a ?- y I I .I a`? z w I\ cc co A L \ V ? fN \ r o ? \ \0 Y / I© i Oq II I u / I ? JZ ` N Y1\ p? ?? I ? U LL o ? W v_ \ Q f LAU ro xavn - wvRETNN r ?I ? MO R/ J0?ao }`?r I ?J42B? 5i1'AS ?C 4 ( C m ?/ l? ?? i I r z a W LA1 = J AS )) I p fp ... O F .Y §, a xzx?, ,? \ `\ o k\X 9® \ r ` i Q Ix x U O? W V G`1 r , z x ° x - •` \ z 6 ?0 X O O?•?j?''>F Q?°0?Q ILA I a ??tiv?w r, GaPb4 ?? o Y I® I I I QN11 ? j A> x '? ?r " z x III I ? i1; }? I It I' x I l x I II II I ? I .?I II .1 --,` cl: `II II \ \ x II II ILI u u1 l I - 1 1 a ? I I I.r II 1 1 . x I ?' n ?? 1 1 u I I I I I g x I 1 E` I+?odl xd w~ 1 1 < .??< II II ?I I X IIII_ l I I!? It's = ??i? Wa w gll II ?\'? _I z? a ? ? I a a? I?j I ?? , La /L I I '' ? ?0 I W ?ZO wFF ?? ? ?=may ?? u 50 fcP? Not I ZO 2 ? p ?'? ,y .I 1 w; I?f` II CL Xc p; LL 11 I l d l l m /0 ZO I I "' 1 1 I I I I c i 1 1 1 (? ct o < m x4 ? I I Z r W ?' ? o° , `J' u E W I I ? N 1121 ? k2 I N S I I 0 I \ zoo 100 ??II WWII I I EX I IWI I C\j I a II , ?//' ,I 11 ? I? -I I --- ?? ? I I X I I I---+- ? 0 l??1 ? ? I I I ?? ? I I © I O IINI? HOiVM DETAIL ROOTWAD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 20' 30' A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL \ pC ??FLO \? P Gl. - \ ROOT F4N 30 3d -3 FOOTER LOG ' FOOTER LOG r' (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT WAD LOGS (O.46m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS -PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES [SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR STABILIZATION MEASURES BANKFULL- ELEVATION (VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. "A- FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. ANCHOR ROCKS TO REST ON TOP OF ROOT WAD. LLT?-ROOT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. ROOT WADS - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SINCE III N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FRODI WAYNESVILLE CITY LIDIITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 11 OF L. ?}- 02-12-01 V I Q ? N I W a I ?f J ~ ?J \ W f ,Q J 7 \ Q I? ,z z Dy P I t a ? U D LiJ N W J a V LA y? O 9 F- O Z x 0 *0 Iy ? La O 0 ? \1 ?,? 6 ? x ? b e ` / z U = b' z N ? m J J d J m D N z O o N ? ?y x ? F U O ? o°• ,.r O cn W F N J F U o°o O F w o o o a z w x n w O ? U O ? Q O '^+ x co U ti C, p ? ? > z ? r O H w O W La z Y U O W F- O O CC) W IT ?W I I` Co m 1 w z 0 u w 3 O J lL F- 3 C) Z= o? J U Q] Z O W C, J Z Z Q- LL, a E > J I ZZ a I W I m Y V >- O O J J Cr W Z H ==OM V1=X N O Ina= cr 0a- W oWa I-DOun C) 0 1- Z CO L/) W z ;s O N z O N U o x Q ?. A O O .? O O ZO U W c inn •? ?1 w a cn '>J w > x J ,^ J Q + a 3?. r _ z, ? s E 4? ® - n 5?+ w o + ti ri-u ?d, S .s. o>> w N?..J NW b w w- z N N=C l1_ cr, U a wp aJO O i} w000 J N z L Z u 7w Q O LIJ $ ?a~ d omo s E z Q U J z a i EM ww? a E o O Q vo M?m j o o J Q - U dW w o w CL [I- N N "N o? a z o Z r cN U ? ? O o Z O b N o Q a >-- OL LLJ E E c z F- ? '- vY - - ° g ow ui Q O 5 n L w r L CL r +a r w \ r- o 1 w co dg ? ? w L1 i V1 ? 3 5' 5 L V ? j N Ql I,- J W 0 F-ZZ - p?W D z w a sC J a F- ?-o Z Z -? U WJJ NJ Q a?p ~a C) J LLI JLL W > Z OW >Cr? J:E zao Ot O ??-? UW Z a J LL- Ocn? WWQ I- JZx=F-? Q ; J L LULL L-Lj-j= F-<L,a_>wO OmOZ'szml? z. N rn ti co co ,- I Imo- I I`- o co 'D CD z I I , I I 1 0 1 W m J I N W Z I ? Z O J a U W z W D 0 °w a Q 1 J N O S v C 7 ` \ \ p C? \ \? cr z 1 ? \ d Q ` ? \ \ N X 3 Q O O 0Y rri C) x LJ N? W (n / / J LL O / F / J a- co cr- CL / w 0 J J / CD Y / Z Z a co r r ?I 0I 0I co ? Q. 0 F O f V N ^ ?-? . -1 N C O o .? O o z w /? 04 x ., ?-4 o z 0 ?F ? .-? z x u v u N O 00 °a O p ? ? ?-' E cMV? O o ? 4 U Q G r W z W x P? W b W U r.? z O N O x O O Ln W .a U a U L:V N O E ITEM INIT. REGIONAL CURVE REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 11.9 KM 2 11.9 KM 2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 10.7 M 6.5 M 610 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.55 M 0.41 M 0.50 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf 5.57 M 2 2.02 M 2 0 M 2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) 15.85 12 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FLOOD PRONE AREA (Wfpa) 8.8 M 15, 0 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.1 2.5 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 M SINUOSITY (K) 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 6.0 MS 2.29 CMS 3.23 CMS 02 17.0 CMS 17.0 CMS I 29.0 CMS 29.0 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 0.96 m/s 1.1 m/s V2 1.46 M/S 1.51 M/S VIO 1.62 M/S 1.76 M/S CLASSIFICATION B4C B4C + EXISTING STREAM IS REFERENCE STREAM STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SINCE III DETAIL ROOTWAD ROOT FANS SHALL LAP OVER ANGLE ROOT WADS 26- 30- A MINIMUM OF 0.6m. (-UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE PGL ??-FL0 ROOT _FA-N- 30° - 0 A3.6 ,.r1. ?11i1W 0 ..II I? .?T7 FOOTER LOG y FOOTER LOG (0.3m DIA.) (0.3m DIA.) ANCHOR ROCKS ROOT +WAD LOGS (0.46m DIA.) WHEN BACKFILLING OVER AND AROUND BOTTOM FOOTER LOGS AND ROOT WAD LOGS PLACE ANCHOR ROCKS ON TOP OF AND ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF LOGS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION METHOD IS TO SHARPEN THE ROOTWAD LOG AND DRIVE THE LOG INTO THE EMBANKMENT. THIS MAY ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR FOOTER LOGS AND ANCHOR ROCKS. ROOT WADS - PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE NATURAL FIBER MATTING WITH LIVE STAKES SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR STABILIZATION MEASURES BANKFULL- ELEVATION ( VARIES ) INVERT ELEV. FOOTER LOG (PLACE 2/3 DIA. BELOW INVERT ELEV.) (NOT TO SCALE) ROOT WADS ANCHOR ROCKS 150- 200 LBS. ANCHOR ROCKS TO REST ON TOP OF ROOT WAD. OT WAD HORIZONTAL TO INVERT ANCHOR FOOTER LOG ROCKS TO BE PLACED ON THE UP AND DOWNSTREAM END OF EACH FOOTER LOG SO THAT IT IS LEANING AGAINST THE LOG ON THE SIDE AWAY FROM THE CHANNEL. - CROSS SECTION ( CUT ) SITE V N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210 A) US 23 BUSINESS FRObf WAYNESVILLE CITY LIAIITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 1(o OF 2=? 02-12-01 Z a O 1-4 N H O H ? a 0 Z O U o `R O O O W n w t utt u? tAi g W o a. U < ?Y J a Ci. r, CL r F- ?? Y 8?? t•utt•.?? 3 as ? ? E Lij O tR Ya1 4 N ' ^ QJ 4? v / 2 a her ai W ° rw W-z N a a° w°° O 3 u Y a z 5 ?z? O o W a d ca 3t _ z E? W° ° M Q U O Q c0 rf-m O Q v 0 r ?OZ W Y ° o W N U Y w Y 33 N cn w o J w Q W (D 4 N U-)t U V) z Z <V) ii O Z ^- SY 4 U .. W L :;(/)w O LL LLJ CL E V) N w x °?Qa O E v'? zs _ y _ _ _ O J " F-'y N . f V Q „ _ - _ _ _ _ Y Q Ow LL r ~ o w Z) s w _? in z o 0 1 H N F C14 _4 Qr) 00 -4 rj) U x U E- Z r.? O o z a o O ? U F a a x ? w z h' W p u 3 2 i<. O a < U W W w N V) N YO lL O O S NK -NY U N O to ? Z Q Z W N w N 3 W r• ?W co ?~ Qa cJ < = U ~ < V) W W W > a ow U Z J to O H O Z N N cc w ? r W J < r 0 N z, /Q J 1 J ? Q W C3 ? I i < Z z ?L! 1 a ? U 1 y W Cr /?1 N cr O w r it 0 CD wo 06 I a Y V O !r Ir W F- O 4 O co r p ? F m M ? 1 1 1 1 ? lW z 1 V Q N _ U Q V) O J <L x i (, Z= O J V co z ° W ? J Z WaE >J I Q(.7Q ZZ 1 W . 1 CD Y U N 9 X W 7 ° ?- a V) ?= X N O V) x Q? w°a < 0W WJZ r•?O? 00 F- X Z03 VI < W .V) b- N Mai z OJ Z O 1 J m_ a. K T N ipwo C_J ?t m j z Q J T m I m ? V O _o=mob dpi b i a ° . _ _ g p U 0? 1 _ ? D. E T -4 0 8 g ? 3 0 g 3 c 0 0 Z! a o t- C: 0 ? `off p ag' ? _o ? o? no C)0 ? 0 C) . P' C Y ULM O +- L 30 x p n L w L ,0 - 0 0 Z) 0 T U.-0 X" ? E L ? +- L = Y C N ao C j +- ?? 3 o+ Ln a?C: N ?oC>., ?? U} U) V) O EL OE U) C) cn0 V) E X +-;6 O Y a U? N O L L L U a O O 0:: C (D cn Q o o ?; O co?oc 0.- z3 W L C, ?- a •- O L CL Q) z O o 3 a Q) i C„y m gg3 h as O a c° z 0 N F ? v O .a z F O w v ? x o ZO ? A 0 U o m v .? ° te U ti a t w ? o z E'+ F O W z W V 1 E ? 0 9 0 o o p 4 ??° U cl? N o ., b ? 'Q. I a. a c o o - ?° 0 o oJy S I 't Q) V L \ I ? k o C ° O ? ? v •Q.Q Q •Q. ° ° ITEM EXISTING STREAM REFERENCE STREAM PROPOSED RELOCATION STREAM NAME RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK RACCOON CREEK DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 23.2 KM 2 23.2 KM 2 23.2 KM2 CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 0.0067 0.0067 0.006 BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf) 6.4 M 6.5 M 5.B4 M MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 4 M 0.41 M 0.46 M BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf) 2 2.23 M 2.02 M 2 2.2 M 2 WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkf / dbkf) II 15.85 12.1 MAXIMUM DEPTH (dmbkf) 0.6 M 0.55 M 0.6 M WIDTH FLOOD PRONE AREA (Wfpo) 8.0 M 13.5 4 M ENTRECHMENT RATIO (ER) 1.2 2.1 2.1 CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 32 MM 32 MM 32 MM SINUOSITY (K) CHANNELIZED DITCH 1.07 1.13 MEANDERS: AVG. LENGTH CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 30 M +\- 60 M AVG. AMPLITUDE CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 10 M +\- 22 M AVG. RADIUS CHANNELIZED DITCH +\- 10 M +\- 20 M DISCHARGES: 0 BANKFULL 1.98 CMS 1.92 CMS 1.85 CMS 02 18.4 CMS 18.4 CMS 18.4 CMS 050 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS 68.1 CMS VELOCITY: V BANKFULL 0.9 M/S 0.9 M/S 0.91 M/S V2 2.0 M/S 2.0 M/S 4 M/ V50 2.6 M/S 2.4 M/S 2.5 M/S CLASSIFICATION G4 134C B4C REFERENCE STREAM IS IMMEDIATELY 4 UPSTREAM OF MITIGATION SITE AND DOWNSTREAM OF RCBC STREAM DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DATA SITE V N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HAYWOOD COUNTY PROJECT: 8.1942901 (R-2210A) US 23 BUSINESS FROM WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS TO SR 1801 SHEET 20 OF 24 02-27-01 z O F 1 G+ F , 00 ? ? U o, W U C4 A zw? E-' O O O ao U) J `n ?:) .1 W. p p F CL. N 0 U G O U R W z 10*40 m I ? ' m i I i ? d y I11 1 I 0 0 a i a V u U O N O O O C9 Q N z s o°?• 00 00 00 co O N 4-4 a Z z x x ° w u C'i Z H ?. o A o O a W d N O Z ? o k- O 0 U W ( D A ' x o Z C4 w O - Z o v A a H Cr i LLJ °° z w W4 O I J I W Z }- Q ? I = F- Z Q 2 ` ° LL) C) Q . M I I 0 w O X J J N O cr I Z LL- 0 D Qo z m w O LLJ J LL. W mI W Z w o 0i?:: Wz I 's I O Z F- ? Q GLl 0o Z J a Q 0 F- lL N .a -WU NJQ ? ' Lli .? U QC:: F- D 0H 0 I J .7 0:? ~ z O U C) J LLI wJLL > Z N C) W JAW ?-. OO U W ?m ? a -1 `OVO z o r LLJ N Za = < (A LL 0 D C:) WLL- F-OW,J? F- <LL- < > WO OcoOZ?z[OLL- Z • r O O O 00 Q N p1 00 00 00 co E rl- f?- PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Haywood Elec. Corp. Haywood Services Corp., Inc. James and Nancy Francis 1560 Asheville Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 300 North Haywood St. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 1449 Asheville Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 Joe H Elise D Palmer Haywood Co.Consolidated School System 2228 Asheville Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2238 Asheville Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2566 Asheville Rd. Plemmons Plumbing and Heating Waynesville, N.C. 28786 William and Alice Gregor Haywood Christian Ministry.lnc. David C. and Lynda B. Blevins l Welch Farm Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 2489 Asheville Rd.' Waynesville, N.C. 28786 541 Peace Mountain Rd. Waynesville, N.C. 28786 Main Street The Champion Paper and Fiber Co. Can ton, N.C. 28716 HAWbob AIVA?JC146 l r :F-,JDATioAJ I q q 1,,j DuaTRIaL- tPAAk 'OR. MYAIE.SVIILF /PDUS]:HIAL PARK ?N[.. 0A.1jVE:5%1ILL.E.) N.C. Ze76(o S o 2 2 N O w C U Q C Q r g K O = a N ? o _ N } r O z ?' LL Z ? m O O N O w O O O v U d N Z = 00 N U. G p L O O O O r W cc _a w x 3: S3 ° w NNt u . 7 QI O Z J C a ¢ a ¢ 7 ? C N u t E o (D ? f7 rn f7 N ?i ?m rn N i°y d t U ? rn v n C C E N ry- a wU E N U a - a o ?' ? dc i?r o 0 0 0 r O w U a m N O n O C? L X 0 0 0 ° Z X 0 0 0 lL `-' Q N ? C C? jp ¢ ¢ a ¢ a t a`0i5L ?2 _ Z Z _ Z Z m _ U) U G N ° a ° c s m t Z ? Z Z 2 Q 0 x C L ZQ w c c C J N O p„ w -? C E 3 c Z Z Z Z Z ? c 0 N C C ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ? r m Z Z Z Z O f- ? n ri o of ? ? ? m U N a x x x H W r 2N .2 O 2 cn N t0 0 ? of ri cn a w N N N d' r N J n ? O to ° ? I rn N + V ? o + LL + ? N ? N fh O N J ? 6 (n Z '- N C'I V ? r z a r [Fwd: R-2210A SP's] Subject: [Fwd: R-2210A SP's] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:43:32 -0400 From: Alice Gordon <agordon@dot.state.nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: Mike Parker <Mike.Parker@ncmail.net> CC: Cynthia VanDer Wiele <Cynthia.vanderwiele@ncmail.net>, Randy Turner <mrtumer@dot.state.nc.us> Mike, I have attached the revisions in the Seeding Plan and the Live Stakeing that you requested. Specifically please see the sections entitled: Seeding in Riparian Areas As you requested we eliminated fescue and bluegrass from the riparian mixture and used Orchard Grass, Switchgrass, landino clover and millet (exact mixtures dependant on season). Live Staking: Also as you requested, we increased the diversity of species in the Live Staking by adding Buttonbush, hazel alder, and rough-leaved dogwood. The attachment is in Acrobat. If you want me to fax you a copy please let me know. Thank you for all your help and work on this project. Alice Gordon Subject: R-2210A SP's Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:25:27 -0400 From: Mark Staley <mstaley@dot.state.nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: Alice Gordon <agordon@dot. state. nc.us> Alice, Here is the entire set of E.C. Special Provisions for R-2210A in Haywood County. Let me know if you do not receive them or have other questions concerning this project. Mark Staley Name: R_2210A.pdf 7N 2210A.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf) Encoding: base64 Download Status: Not downloaded with message 1 of 2 8/31/01 4:13 PP [Fwd: R-2210A SP'sl Alice Gordon <agordon@dot.state.nc.us> Envir. Spec. II Project Development & Environmental Analysis 2 of 2 8/31/014:13 I of 18 8.1942902 Project Special Provisions Erosion Control Seeding And Mulching: (8) The kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and limestone, shall be as stated below. During periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall be determined by the Engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre (kilograms per hectare). August 1 - June 1 20# (23kg) Kentucky Bluegrass 75# (8kg) Hard Fescue 500# (560kg) Fertilizer 4000# (4500kg) Limestone May 1 20# (23kg) 75# (84kg) 25# (28kg) 500# (560kg) 4000# (4500kg) - September 1 Kentucky Bluegrass Hard Fescue German or Browntop Millet Fertilizer Limestone All areas adjacent to lawns must be hand finished as directed by the Engineer to give a "lawn type appearance". Remove all trash, debris, and stones 3/4 inch (19 mm) and larger in diameter or other obstructions that could interfere with providing a smooth `lawn type appearance". Approved Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars: Adelphi Baron Bristol Challenger Columbia Fylking Glade Kenblue Merit Plush Ram I Rugby Sydsport Touchdown Vantage Approved Hard Fescue Cultivars: Aurora Bardur Crystal Reliant Scaldis Spartan Valda Waldina Warwick On cut and fill slopes 2:1 or steeper add 25# (28kg) Rye Grain August 1 - June 1. On cut and fill slopes 2:1 or steeper add 30# (35 kg) Sericea Lespedeza January 1 - December 31. 08/29/01 Haywood County Fertilizer shall be 10-20-20 analysis. Upon written approval of the Engineer, a different analysis of fertilizer may be used provided the 1-2-2 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant food as a 10-20-20 analysis. 2of18 Seeding in Riparian Areas: 08/29/01 The following seed mix shall be used to seed the 25 foot (8 meter) wide riparian areas adjacent to the relocated streams at Sta. 16+71 to 19+34 -L- Rt. and Sta. 28+80 to 32+00 -L- Lt. The kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and limestone, shall be as stated below. During periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall be determined by the engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre (kilograms per hectare). August 1 - June 1 50# (56kg) Orchard Grass 20# (23kg) Switchgrass 15# (17kg) Ladino Clover 500# (560kg) Fertilizer 4000# (4500kg) Limestone May 1 - September 1 50# (56kg) 20# (23kg) 15# (17kg) 25# (28kg) 500# (560kg) 4000# (4500kg) Temporary Seeding: Orchard Grass Switchgrass Ladino Clover Japanese Millet Fertilizer Limestone Fertilizer shall be the same analysis as specified for "Seeding and Mulching" and applied at the rate of 400 pounds (450kg) and seeded at the rate of 50 pounds per acre (55kg per hectare). German Millet, or Browntop Millet shall be used in summer months and rye grain during the remainder of the year. The Engineer will determine the exact dates for using each kind of seed. Fertilizer Topdressing: Fertilizer used for topdressing shall be 16-8-8 grade and shall be applied at the rate of 500 pounds per acre (560 kg per hectare). Upon written approval of the Engineer, a different analysis of fertilizer may be used provided the 2-1-1 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to provide the same amount of plant food as 16-8-8 analysis. Supplemental Seeding: The kinds of seed and proportions shall be the same as specified for "Seeding and Mulching", and the rate of application may vary from 25# to 75# per acre (28kg to 85kg per hectare). The actual rate per acre (hectare) will be determined by the Engineer prior to the time of topdressing and the Contractor will be notified in writing of the rate per acre (hectare), total quantity needed, and areas on which to apply the supplemental seed. Minimum tillage equipment, consisting of a sod seeder shall be used for incorporating seed into the soil as to prevent disturbance of existing vegetation. A clodbuster (ball and chain) may be used where degree of slope prevents the use of a sod seeder. Mowing: The minimum mowing height on this project shall be six inches (150 mm). 3of18 Specialized Hand Mowing: 08/29/01 The work covered by this section consists of specialized hand mowing around or under fixed objects, including but not limited to guardrails, signs, barriers and slopes in a method acceptable to the Engineer. The work of specialized hand mowing shall be completed with mechanically powered trimmers, string trimmers, hand operated rotary mowers, or self-propelled mowers of sufficient size and quality to perform the work timely and efficiently. The quantity of mowing to be performed will be affected by the actual conditions which occur during the construction of the project. The quantity of mowing may be increased, decreased or eliminated entirely at the direction of the Engineer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of construction or a change in the character of the work. The quantity of specialized hand mowing to be paid for will be the actual number of man hours worked while hand mowing along the surface of the ground, at the direction of the Engineer. Where an area has been mowed more than once, at the direction of the Engineer, separate measurement will be made each time the area is mowed. Payment will be made under: Specialized Hand Mowing ............................................................................... HR Culvert Diversion Channel: Description: Provide a culvert diversion channel to detour existing stream around the culvert construction site at locations shown on the plans. Work includes constructing diversion channel, disposing of excess materials, providing and placing filter fabric liner, maintaining diversion area in an acceptable condition, removing filter fabric liner, backfilling diversion channel area with suitable material and providing proper drainage when diversion channel area is abandoned. Material: Use local material or material specified on plans. Provide filter fabric to meet requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2 fabric. Construction requirements: Grade channel according to plan with channel surface free of obstructions, debris, and pockets of low density material. 4 of 18 08/29/01 Utilize suitable material and provide disposal area for unsuitable material. Line channel with fabric unrolled in the direction of flow and lay smoothly but loosely on soil surface without creases. Bury top of slope fabric edge in a trench at least five inches (125mm) deep and tamp. Make vertical overlaps a minimum of eighteen inches (450mm) with upstream fabric overlapping the downstream fabric. Secure fabric with eleven gauge (3.05mm) wire staples shaped into a "u" shape with a length of not less than six inches (150mm) and a throat not less than one inch (25mm) in width. Place staples along outer edges and throughout the fabric a maximum of three feet (one meter) horizontally and vertically. Method of Measurement: Measurement of excavation will be made by the cubic yard (cubic meter) of excavation as calculated from the typical section throughout the length of the diversion channel as shown on the final approved plans. Measurement of filter fabric will be made by the number of square yards (square meters) as measured over the surface of the ground over which filter fabric has been acceptably placed. No measurement will be made for other items or for over excavation or stockpiling. Basis of Payment: Payment will be made for the quantities as measured above under the items listed below: Culvert Diversion Channel ...................................................................... CY (M3) Filter Fabric for Drainage ......................................................................... SY (M2) Impervious Dike: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing, maintaining, and removing an impervious dike for the purpose of diverting normal stream flow around the construction site. The Contractor shall construct an impervious dike in such a manner approved by the Engineer. The impervious dike shall not permit seepage of water into the construction site or contribute to siltation of the stream. The impervious dike shall be constructed of an acceptable material in the locations noted on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. Acceptable materials shall include but not be limited to sheet piles, sandbags, and/or the placement of an acceptable size stone lined with polypropylene or other impervious fabric. 5of18 08/29/01 Earth material shall not be used to construct an impervious dike when it is in direct contact with the stream unless vegetation can be established before contact with the stream takes place. The quantity of impervious dike to be paid for will be the actual number of linear feet (meters) of impervious dike(s) constructed, measured in place from end to end of each separate installation which has been completed and accepted. The quantity of impervious dikes measured as provided above will be paid for at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter) for "Impervious Dike". The above prices and payments will be full compensation for all work covered by this section including but not limited to furnishing all of the materials in the impervious dike, construction, maintenance, and removal of the impervious dike. Waste Areas And Borrow Sources: Payment for temporary erosion control measures, except those made necessary by the Contractor's own negligence or for his own convenience, will be paid for at the appropriate contract unit price for the devices or measures utilized in borrow sources and waste areas. No additional payment will be made for erosion control devices or permanent seeding and mulching in any commercial borrow or waste pit. All erosion and sediment control practices which may be required on a commercial borrow or waste site will be done at the Contractor's expense. Temporary Diversion: The work by this section for installation, maintenance, and cleanout of temporary diversions shall be in accordance with Section 1630. The quantity of excavation for installation and cleanout measured as provided in Article 1630-4 will be paid for at the contract unit price per cubic yard (cubic meter) as provided in Article 1630-5 for "Silt Excavation". Special Sediment Control Fence: Description: The work covered by this section consists of the construction, maintenance, and removal of special sediment control fence. Build special sediment control fence according to the detail located on the plans. Place special sediment control fence as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. 6of18 Materials: (A) Posts: 08/29/01 Either wood or steel posts may be used. Wood posts shall be a minimum of 6 feet long (1.8 m), at least 3 inches (75 mm) in diameter, and straight enough to provide a fence without noticeable misalignment. Steel posts shall be at least 5 feet (1.5 m) in length, approximately 13/8 inches (35 mm) wide measured parallel to the fence, and have a minimum weight of 1.25 lb/ft (1.86 kg/m) of length. The post shall be equipped with an anchor plate having a minimum area of 14.0 square inches (9000 square millimeters), and shall have a means of retaining wire in the desired position without displacement. (B) 1/4 inch (6.4mm) Hardware Cloth: Hardware cloth shall have 1/4 inch (6.4mm) openings constructed from #24 gauge wire. Install hardware cloth according to the detail shown on the plans. (C) Sediment Control Stone: Sediment control stone shall meet the requirements of Section 1005. Install stone according to the detail shown on the plans. Maintenance and Removal: The Contractor shall maintain the special sediment control fence until the project is accepted or until the fence is removed, and shall remove and dispose of silt accumulations at the fence when so directed by the Engineer in accordance with Section 1630. Method of Measurement: The quantity of 1/4 inch (6.4mm) hardware cloth to be paid for will be the actual number of linear feet (meters) measured along the ground, which has been completed and accepted. The quantity of sediment control stone will be measured according to Article 1610-4. Basis of Payment: Payment for special sediment control fence will be as follows: 1 /4 inch (6.4mm) Hardware Cloth .................................................................... LF (M) Sediment Control Stone ............................................................................. TON (MT) 7of18 Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat: General: 08/29/01 This work shall consist of furnishing and placing "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat", of the type specified, over previously prepared areas as directed by the Engineer. Materials: The product shall be permanent erosion control reinforcement mat and shall be constructed of 100% coconut fiber stitch bonded between a heavy duty UV stabilized cuspated (crimped) netting overlaid with a heavy duty UV stabilized top net. The three nettings shall be stitched together on 1.5 inch (38 mm) centers UV stabilized polyester thread to form a permanent three dimensional structure. The mat shall have the following physical properties: Property Ground Cover Thickness Mass Per Unit Area Tensile Strength Elongation Tensile Strength Elongation Tensile Strength Elongation Resiliency UV Stability * Color(Permanent Net) Porosity (Permanent Net) Minimum Filament Diameter (permz Test Method Image Analysis ASTM D1777 ASTM D3776 ASTM D5035 ASTM D5035 ASTM D5035 ASTM D5035 ASTM D1682 ASTM D 1682 ASTM D1777 ASTM D4355 Calculated Measured anent net) Value Unit 93 % 0.63 (16) in (mm) 0.92 (0.50) lb/sy (kg/m2) 480 (714.2) lb/ft (kg/m) 49 % 960 (1428.5) lb/ft (kg/m) 31 % 177 (80.3) lbs (kg) 22 % >80 % 151 (68.5) lbs (kg) UV Black >95 % 0.03 (0.8) in (mm) *ASTM D1682 Tensile Strength and % strength retention of material after 1000 hours of exposure in a Xenon-arc weatherometer. A certification (Type 1, 2, or 3) from the manufacturer showing: 1) the chemical and physical properties of the mat used, and 2) conformance of the mat with this specification will be required. Soil Preparation: All areas to be protected with the mat shall be brought to final grade and seeded in accordance with Section 1660. The surface of the soil shall be smooth, firm, stable and free of rocks, clods, roots or other obstructions which would prevent the mat from lying 8 of 18 08/29/01 in direct contact with the soil surface. Areas where the mat is to be placed will not need to be mulched. Measurement: The quantity of "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat" to be paid for shall be the actual number of square yards (square meters), surface measure, completed, and accepted. Overlaps will not be included in the measurement, and will be considered as incidental to the work. Basis of Payment: This work will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for "Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat" of the type specified, complete in place and accepted. Such payment shall be full compensation for furnishing and installing the mat in accordance with this specification, and for all required maintenance. Payment will be made under: Permanent Soil Reinforcement Mat ................................................................ SY (M2) Sodding (Zoysia): General: Sod shall be placed under all guiderail and all guardrail sections in accordance with detail for "Sodding Placement Under New Guardrail/Guiderail" and as directed by the Engineer. Sod shall be placed so that there is symmetry between the portion of the sod behind the guardrail post and in front of the face of the guardrail. No sod shall be placed where suitable stands of centipede exist as determined by the Engineer. The sodding shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable requirements of Section 1663 of the Standard Specifications and the following provisions: The Contractor shall obtain a certificate or limited permit issued by The N.C. Department of Agriculture (1-800-206-9333) or (919-733-6932) stating that the sod has been found to be free of injurious plant pests. Materials: Only "approved sod" (trade designation) consisting of zoysiagrass shall be used. Approved zoysiagrass cultivars shall be from the following list or from other cultivars approved by the Engineer. Meyer El-Toro 9 of 18 08/29/01 The sod, machine cut to the suppliers standard width and length, shall be 5/8 inch (16 mm) minimum, excluding top growth and thatch, at the time of cutting. Before cutting, the sod shall be uniformly mowed at a height of 3/4"to 1"(19-25 mm). Standard sod sections shall be sufficiently strong to support their own weight and retain their size and shape when suspended vertically from a firm grasp on the upper 10% of the section. Sod shall be delivered on site within 24 hours of being cut and be covered by acceptable means during delivery. A certificate from the sod producer stating the date and time of sod cutting shall accompany the sod when it arrives at the project site. Under sections where new median guardrail/guiderail is to be installed only 42 inch (1067 mm) wide roll sod is to be used. Other areas requiring sod may be either 42 inch (1067 mm) wide roll sod or 18 inch by 36 inch (457 mm by 914 mm) strips as long as a 36 inch (914 mm) minimum width is placed under the guardrail/ guiderail. Soil Preparation: Remove litter and other debris. Mow and satisfactorily dispose of weeds or other unacceptable growth on the areas to be sodded. Prior to beginning preparation of the soil to receive sod, all eroded, uneven and rough areas shall be contour graded and/or filled with soil as directed by the Engineer. The soil shall be scarified or otherwise loosened to a depth of not less than 5 inches (130 mm) with a maximum width of 48 inches (1145 mm). Clods shall be broken and the top 2 to 3 inches (52*to 78 mm) of soil shall be worked into an acceptable soil bed by the use of soil pulverizers, drags, or harrows. After soil preparation, lime and fertilizer shall be uniformly distributed by mechanical means using a 42 inch (1065 mm) drop type spreader and thoroughly mixed with the top five inches (130 mm) of the soil by discing, harrowing, or other approved methods. The rates of limestone and fertilizer per acre (hectare) is as follows: 500# (560 kg) 10-20-20 Fertilizer 4000# (4485 kg) Limestone The area shall then be harrowed, dragged, raked, or prepared by other approved methods which will give a lawn type finish. All trash, debris and stones larger than 1-1 /2 inch (38 mm) in diameter or other obstructions that could interfere with the placing of the sod shall also be removed. The finished surface shall be moistened with water prior to placing the sod as directed by the Engineer. 10 of 18 Placement: 08/29/01 Sod handling and placement shall be a continuous process of cutting, transporting and installing including repairing seams and voids. Sod shall always be installed within 48 hours after being cut. Sod shall be watered within 2 hours of installation. Any sod or portions of sod rejected by the Engineer during the initial placement shall be removed from the project and replaced with acceptable sod immediately. The Contractor shall cease any and all other placement of sod on the project until rejected sod has been replaced. After sod has been placed, and staked where necessary, according to Section 1663, it shall then be rolled or tamped carefully and firmly by means acceptable to the Engineer to ensure proper soil contact. If rolled, roller shall weigh 150#/ft (224kg/m) of roller width. Use of rubber tired equipment to roll shall not be allowed. Metal staples, 12 inches (305 mm) long unless otherwise approved, shall be made of 11 gauge (3.0 mm diameter) new steel wire so as not to bend when pinned or driven through the sod. Extreme care shall be taken to prevent the installed sod from being torn or displaced. After rolling or tamping the sod, it shall be watered uniformly and thoroughly with a minimum of 1 inch of water (5.6 gallons per square yard (25 liters per square meter) applied immediately after installation of sod. In no case shall the time interval between sod placement and initial watering exceed 2 hours. Water shall be placed to the required quantity through sequential passes to insure proper coverage and to prevent runoff. A minimum of/4 inch (6.4 mm) should be placed on each pass. Maintenance: The Contractor shall be responsible for all watering and other maintenance required to maintain the livability and health of the sod from installation until completion of the 60 day observation period. Additional water shall be applied as needed and as directed by the Engineer to maintain the livability of the sod. Each additional watering event shall be a minimum of 0.5 inch of water (2.8 gallons per square yard (13 liters per square meter)) uniformly applied over the sodded area and may be placed in a series of passes to prevent runoff, with a minimum of/4 inch (6.4 mm) on each pass. Any sod or portions of sod rejected by the Engineer after placement but prior to beginning the observation period, shall be removed from the project and replaced with acceptable sod. Satisfactory replacement of sod shall begin within 10 days of notification. Failure to replace and repair damaged or dead sod as directed by the Engineer may result in sanctions under Article 108-7 or Article 108-8. Observation Period: The Contractor shall maintain responsibility for the sod for a 60 day observation period beginning upon the satisfactory completion and acceptance of all work required in the plans or as directed by the Engineer. The Contractor shall guarantee the sod under the payment and performance bond, refer to Article 109-10 in the standard specifications. I I of 18 08/29/01 In the following counties, the 60 day observation period for sod installed between August 31 and March 1, shall not begin until March 1: Alexander Catawba Jackson Surry Alleghany Cherokee Macon Swain Ashe Clay Madison Transylvania Avery Graham McDowell Watauga Buncombe Haywood Mitchell Wilkes Burke Henderson Polk Yadkin Caldwell Iredell Rutherford Yancey Installation of sod shall be permitted between August 31 and March 1, however, the Engineer shall not accept such work and begin the 60 day observation period prior to March 1. Upon satisfactory completion of work and acceptance by the Engineer, the 60 day observation period shall begin. In all other counties, the 60 day observation period for sod installed between September 30 and March 1, shall not begin until March 1. The Contractor shall be responsible year round for all watering and other maintenance required to maintain the livability of the sod from installation until final acceptance including monitoring the sod to ensure all watering and other maintenance is performed as required. After the first 30 days of the 60 day observation period, the Contractor and Engineer shall meet to review the project and identify dead or damaged sod to be replaced. The Contractor, at no additional expense to the Department, shall satisfactorily replace any sod that is not in a living and healthy condition as determined by the Engineer. Replacement sod shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the same requirements as for initial sodding operation, except that the amounts of limestone, sulfur, and water may be readjusted as directed by the Engineer. Satisfactory replacement of sod shall begin within 10 days of notification. Failure to replace and repair damaged or dead sod as directed by the Engineer may result in sanctions under Article 108-7 or Article 108-8. Upon completion and acceptance of the sod repairs, the remaining 30 days of the observation period shall begin. Acceptance: At the end of the 60 day observation period, the sod furnished and installed under this contract must be in a living and healthy condition, as determined by the Engineer. Acceptance of sod will be either at the end of the 60 day observation period or at final acceptance of the project, which ever is later. Sodding shall be inspected by the Area Roadside Environmental Engineer to begin and end the 60 day observation period. 12 of 18 08/29/01 The sod shall be weed free at time of final acceptance. Payment: Payment and measurement shall be in accordance with Section 1663 of the Standard Specifications. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: This project is located in an "Environmentally Sensitive Area". This designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings, and grading operations within the area identified on the plans. This also requires special procedures to be used for seeding and mulching and staged seeding within the project. Clearing and Grubbing: In areas identified on the erosion control plans as "Environmentally Sensitive Areas", the Contractor may perform clearing operations, but not grubbing operations until immediately prior to beginning grading operations as described in Section 200, Article 200-1, in the Standard Specifications. The `Environmentally Sensitive Area" shall be defined as a 50 foot (16 meter) buffer zone on both sides of the stream (or depression), measured from top of streambank, (or center of depression). Only clearing operations (not grubbing) shall be allowed in this buffer zone until immediately prior to beginning grading operations. Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation. Grading: Once grading operations begin in identified `Environmentally Sensitive Areas". work will progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction within these areas must progress in a continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas permanently stabilized prior to beginning of next phase. Failure on the part of the Contractor to complete any phase of construction in a continuous manner in "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" as specified will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of work in accordance with Section 108-7 of the Standard Specifications. Temporary Stream Crossings: Any crossing of streams within the limits of this project must be accomplished in accordance with Section 107-13(b) of the Standard Specifications. Seeding and Mulching: Seeding and mulching shall be performed in accordance with Section 1660 of the Standard Specifications and vegetative cover sufficient to restrain erosion shall be installed immediately following grade establishment. 13 of 18 08/29/01 Seeding and mulching shall be performed on the areas disturbed by construction immediately following final grade establishment. No appreciable time shall lapse into the contract time without stabilization of slopes, ditches and other areas within the `Environmentally Sensitive Areas"as indicated on the E.C. Plans. Stage Seeding: The work covered by this section shall consist of the establishment of a vegetative cover on cut and fill slopes as grading progresses. Seeding and mulching shall be done in stages on cut and fill slopes which are greater than 20 feet (6 meters) in height or greater than 2 acres (0.8 hectares) in area. Each stage shall not exceed the limits stated above. All work described above will be paid for at the contract unit prices established in the contract for the work involved. Additional payments will not be made for the requirements of this section as the cost for this work should be included in the contract unit prices for the work involved. Gravel Construction Entrance: Description: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing, and maintaining and removing any and all material required for the construction of a Gravel Construction Entrance. Materials: The filter fabric shall meet the requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2 Fabric. Stone shall be Class A Stone and shall meet the requirements of Section 1042 for Stone for Erosion Control, Class A. Construction: The Contractor shall install a Gravel Construction Entrance in accordance with the details in the plans and at locations as directed by the Engineer. Method Of Measurement: Gravel Construction Entrance will not be measured for payment under this section. Basis Of Payment: Payment for installation of Filter Fabric shall be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard "Filter Fabric for Drainage". 14 of 18 08/29/01 Payment for installation of Class A Stone shall be paid for at the contract unit price per ton `Stone for Erosion Control, Class A". Such price and payment shall be considered full compensation for all work covered by this provision including all materials, construction, maintenance, and removal of Gravel Construction Entrance as directed by the Engineer. Minimize Removal Of Vegetation: The Contractor shall minimize removal of vegetation at stream banks and disturbed areas within the project limits as directed by the Engineer. Stream Channel Relocation Limitations: The following sequence of construction must be followed in the areas designated on the plans as stream relocation. Failure on the part of the Contractor to follow this sequence, and complete each step prior to proceeding in this area as specified, will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of work in accordance with Section 108-7 of the Standard Specifications. 1. Clear, but do not grub area within the Environmentally Sensitive Area on the existing stream to be relocated. 2. Construct and stabilize, with vegetation or -erosion control material, the proposed stream channel relocation as shown on the plans. 3. Divert water into newly constructed channel only after it has been stabilized and approved. 4. Begin grubbing and/or grading within Environmentally Sensitive Area of existing stream. The above requirements apply to the stream channels being constructed at the following stations: Sta. 16+71 to 19+34 -L- Rt. Sta. 28+80 to 32+00 -L- Lt. Rootwads: The Contractor shall identify and stockpile rootwads encountered during Clearing and Grubbing. These shall be used to stabilize the streambank after its construction. Rootwads to be used forstreambank stabilization should have a trunk diameter of 0.3 to 0.45 meters and should have 3 meters of the trunk length remaining. The Contractor, upon removal of the trunk and root, shall remove soil to the extent acceptable to the Engineer. Care shall be taken to preserve the root structure and shown on the detail in the plans. 15 of 18 Method of Measurement: 08/29/01 The quantity of rootwads measured will be paid for according to the actual number of rootwads each, as installed and accepted by the Engineer. Basis of Payment: The quantity of rootwads, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per each for "Rootwads". The above prices and payments will be full compensation for all work covered by this section, including but not limited to excavation, furnishing and installing all rootwads, footer logs, cut-off logs, anchor rocks, and fill material. Payment will be made under: Rootwads .......................................................................................................... EACH Coir Fiber Mat: Description: Furnish material, install and maintain coir fiber mat in locations shown on the plans or in locations as directed by the engineer. Work includes providing all materials, excavating and backfilling, and placing and securing Coir Fiber Matting. Materials: (A) Matting: Provide matting to meet the following requirements: 100 % coconut fiber (coir) twine woven into a high strength matrix. Thickness - 0.30 in. minimum. (7.6 mm) Tensile Strength - 1348 x 626 lb/ft minimum (1650.5 x 766.5 kg/m) Elongation - 34% x 38% maximum Flexibility (mg-cm)- Flow Velocity- Weight - Size - "C" Factor - Open Area (measured) - (B) Staples: 65030 x 29590 Observed 11 ft/sec (3.35 m/s) 20 oz/SY (678 g/SM) 6.6 x 164 ft (120 SY) or (100 SM) 0.002 50% Provide staples made of 0.125 in. (3.05 mm) diameter new steel wire formed into a `U" shape not less than 12 in. (300) mm in length with a throat of 1 in. (25 mm) in width. 16 of 18 Construction Methods: 08/29/01 Place the matting immediately upon final grading. Provide a smooth soil surface free from stones, clods, or debris which will prevent the contact of the matting with the soil. Take care to preserve the required line, grade, and cross section of the area covered. Unroll the matting and apply without stretching such that it will lie smoothly but loosely on the soil surface. Bury the top slope end of each piece of matting in a narrow trench at least 6 in. (150 mm) deep and tamp firmly. Where one roll of matting ends and a second roll begins, overlap the end of the upper roll over the buried end of the second roll so there is a 6 in. (150 mm) overlap. Construct check trenches at least 12 in. (0.3 m) deep every 50 ft. (16 m) longitudinally along the edges of the matting or as directed by the Engineer. Fold over and bury matting to the full depth of the trench, close and tamp firmly. Overlap matting at least 6 in. (150 mm) where 2 or more widths of matting are installed side by side. Place staples across the matting at ends, junctions, and check trenches approximately 1 ft. (0.3 m) apart. Place staples along the outer edges and down the center of each strip of matting 3 feet (1 meter) apart. Place staples along all lapped edges 1 ft. (0.3 m) apart. The Engineer may require adjustments in the trenching or stapling requirements to fit individual site conditions. Method of Measurement: The quantity of coir fiber matting measured will be paid for according to the actual number of square yard (square meters) measured along the surface of the ground over which coir fiber matting is installed and accepted. Basis of Payment: The quantity of Coir Fiber Matting, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for "Coir Fiber Matting." Payment will be made under: Coir Fiber Matting ................................ ....... Square Yard (Square Meter) Live Staking: Description: The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, installing and maintaining live stakes as shown on the plans or in locations as directed by the Engineer. Work includes providing all materials necessary to install the live stake cuttings. 17 of 18 08/29/01 Materials: Live staking plant material shall consist of a random mix made up of Willow (Salix sp.), Red-osier Dogwood (Corpus stolonifera), Silky Dogwood (Corpus amomum), Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Hazel Alder (Alnus serrulata), and Roughleaf Dogwood (Cornus drummondii). Other species may be substituted upon approval of Engineer. All plant material shall be harvested locally (within the same physiographic ecoregion and plant hardiness zone) or purchased from a local nursery, with the approval of the Engineer. All live stakes shall be dormant at time of acquisition and planting. Live stakes shall be installed between November 15 and March 15. Live stakes shall be 1/2-2" (12-50 mm) in diameter. Stakes shall also be 2 - 3 feet (.6 - 1 meter) in length. During preparation, the basal ends of the live stakes shall be cleanly cut at an angle to facilitate easy insertion into the soil, while the tops shall be cut square or blunt for tamping. All limbs shall be removed from the sides of the live cutting prior to installation. Installation: Live stakes shall be installed within 48 hours of cutting. Outside storage locations should be continually shaded and protected from wind and direct sunlight. Live cut plant material shall remain moist at all times before planting. Install live stakes according to the details in the plan sheets. Tamp live stakes perpendicularly into the finished bank slope with a dead blow hammer, with buds oriented in an upward direction. Stakes should be tamped until approximately 3/4 of the stake length is within the ground. The area around each live stake shall be compacted by foot after the live stake has been installed. Stakes shall be spaced approximately four (4) feet on center. Live stakes should be installed according to the configuration presented in the details of the plan sheets. One to two inches shall be cut cleanly off of the top of each live stake (with lopers) at an angle of approximately 15 degrees following installation. Any stakes that are split or damaged during installation shall be removed and replaced. 18 of 18 Method of Measurement: 08/29/01 The quantity of live staking measured and accepted, will be paid for at the contract unit bid price per square yard (square meter) for "Live Staking". Basis of Payment: The quantity of live staking, measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per square yard (square meter) for `Live Staking". The above prices and payments will be considered full compensation for all work covered by this Section, including but not limited to furnishing, and installing all live stakes. Payment will be made under: Live Staking ................................................................................................... SY (M2) yd Y"` A STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY January 3, 2002 LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRFTARY T.I.P. Project: R-221 OA State Project: 8.1942902 F. A. Project: STP2313(2) County: Haywood Description: US 23 Business from Waynesville to SR 1801 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. S. D. DeWitt, P. E. State Construction Engineer FROM: R. G. Watson, P. E. Division Engineer SUBJECT: Natural Environment Preconstruction Conference A preconstruction conference for concerns with the natural environment on the subject project was held 9:00 am on this date. Those in attendance were: Joel Setzer NCDOT- Division Construction Engineer (828) 586-2141 A. C. Cochran NDDOT- Resident Engineer (828) 497-7333 Mark Davis NCDOT- Div. 14 Environmental Officer (828) 586-2141 Ronnie Sutton NCDOT- Whittier Construction (828) 497-7333 David E. Hudson Harrison Construction (865) 983-3100 Gary Loflin Harrison Construction (865) 983-3100 Abraham Welch Welch Contracting Inc. (828) 497-4138 Jim Moore NCDOT-Div. 14 Construction (828) 497-7333 The following items were reviewed: Special Project Commitments • NCDOT will notify the N. C. Geodetic Survey prior to construction. • NCDOT's best management practices for the protection of surface waters and sedimentation control guidelines will be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project. Page • Instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zones are prohibited from January 1 through April 15 at culvert construction sites, 2, 3, and 4. • The new stream design should be constructed outside the moratorium period. • Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is disturbed and maintained until project completion and the use of erosion control matting around all stream crossings and adjacent to streams. • Vegetation shall be planted on all bare soils with 15 days of ground disturbing activities. • All instream work shall be performed during low flow conditions. • Storm water shall be directed to buffer areas or retention basis and should not be routed directly into streams. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water sheet flow. • No live concrete shall come in contact with surface waters until it has hardened. • All mechanized equipment used near or in surface waters shall be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of waters from fuel lubricants, hydraulic fuels, or other toxic materials. • The presence of mechanical equipment in stream channels shall be minimized. If necessary to have equipment in stream, the equipment will be thoroughly cleaned prior to entry. • Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert extensions. Culverts shall be installed one foot below the stream to allow for movement of fish and other aquatic life. • Use of riprap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rater, native vegetation consisting of Orchard grass, switch grass and Landino clover in the riparian area is to be planted. • Rock silt screens at culvert outlets shall be removed at project completion. • Any impacts to waters or wetlands associated with waste or borrow pits from this project may require additional mitigation. • Riprap and other hard structures may only be used if required by the Division of Land Resources or a Delegated Local Program. Additionally, all repair designs must be submitted to and receive written approval from the DWQ before the repair work is performed. Project Permits • New stream channels shall be constructed in the dry and stabilized prior to turning water into them. • Avoid putting equipment in streams. • NCDOT will be responsible for certifying permit compliance. • Filter cloth will be used under rip rap in "Permitted" Areas. Page 3 Project Special Provisions • Evaluations for potential wetlands and endangered species are required for all borrow or waste sites. The suggested minimum distance from water is fifty feet for these sites from water. • Seeding and mulching needs to occur as soon as possible in sensitive areas and within fifteen days in all areas. The contractor must begin work on erosion control with 54 hours of proper notification by NCDOT. • Seeding in riparian areas requires a special seed mix. (see pg. 143 of the proposal). The mix centaining the Japanese Millet will be used May 1 to September 1. • Construction requirements for the Culvert Diversion Channel (pg. 145 were pointed out. • Construction sequences in Environmentally Sensitive Areas (pg. 153-154) were reviewed. • The contractor is to minimize removal of vegetation (pg. 155). • Constriction sequences for stream channel relocation (pg. 155) were pointed out. • Rootwads were reviewed. The contract specifies 23 rootwads. NCDOT was concerned that 23 would be insufficient and requested the contractor find 30 rootwads. If you additional information, please advise. RGW/JBS/lbb Attachment cc: Mr. David Hudson, Harrison's Construction w/attach. Mr. Mark Davis, NCDOT, Div. 14 Mr. Cameron Cochran, P. E., NCDOT, Resident Engineer Mr. Owen Anderson, NCWRC, w/attach. Mr. John Hendrix, USACOE, w/attach. Ms. Marella Buncick, USFW, w/attach. Mr. Richard Moore, DENR, Land Quality, w/attach. Ms. Cynthia VanDerWeil, DENR, DWQ, w/attach. o?jF W ATF9QG r O -? Michael F. Easley - Governor William G. Ross, Jr. Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Kerr T. Stevens Division of Water Quality Division of Water Quality Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Wetlands/401 Unit Location: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Contact Information: General 919-733-1786 Fax: 919-733-6893 Fax To: to 0 d4 Fax Number: 733 979'f Company: PD&9 Date: 2-?f • o I From: -C. (,art, Qen fd Phone: A,(A NCDENR No. Of Pages including cover sheet: Notes or special instructions: X • 22f0 A Division of Water Quality 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Ste 250 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Wetlands/401 Unit: (919) 733-1786 Fax: (919) 733-6893 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director MENIORANDUNI TFOWA NCDENR September 24, 1999 To: Melba McGee Through: John Dorn From: John Hennessy C"7" Subject: Comments on the FONSI for the proposed improvements to US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive near the Waynesville City Limits to SR t801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville in Haywood County (R-2210 A), Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B (1), State Project No. 8.1942901, TIP Project No. R- 2210 A, DENR Project Number OOE-OtO4. This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the U.S., including wetlands. The document anticipates impacts resultant from the project to 1729 linear feet of streams. The DWQ offers the following comments based on review of the aforementioned document: .A) At this time, the DWQ concurs with the Finding of No Significant Impact. The proposed impacts are not of a magnitude and nature to preclude the construction of the project. B) While the FONSI does an excellent job of discussing anticipated impacts to streams, it is mute on wetland impacts. DOT needs to include any wetland impacts in the 401 Water Quality Certification application. C) The DOT environmental commitments presented on pages 4, 10, and I l are excellent and need to be included in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification. D) Prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. Based on the impacts described in the document, wetland mitigation will be required for this project. Should the impacts to jurisdictional wetlands exceed 1.0 acres, mitigation may be required in accordance with NCDWQ Wetland Rules ( 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(2)). E) In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules ( I5A NCAC 21-1.0506(b)(6) ), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules ( 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3)), the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation. 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50°b recycled; 10% post-consumer paper Mr. William D (;ilmore memo 09/'_4/99 Page ' F) Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges he used in lieu of culverts. However, we realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable. G) Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. H) Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Impacts to wetlands in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation. 1) The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to discharge directly into the creek. Instead, stormwater should be designed to drain to a properly desk:ned stormwater detention facility/apparatus. J) There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required in conjunction with the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. K) Future documentation should include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping. L) Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams will require an Individual Permit application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please be aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development of an acceptable stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate. The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact John Hennessy at (919) 733-694. cc: Steve Lund, Corps of Engineers Tom McCartney, USFWS David Cox, NCWRC Mike Parker, Asheville NCDWQ Regional Office C:\ncdot\TIP R-2 10\comments\ R-'_' 10 FONSI comments-doc . It" , • - US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) From Marshall Street/Woodland Drive/Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-2313(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 A ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and N. C. Department of Transportation Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (C) 7-29-77 Date v. -!br William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT Da icholas L. Graf, P. E. Division Administrator, FHWA US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) From Marshall Street/Woodland Drive near the Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-2313(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 A FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT July, 1999 Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By: ESSI4 9•s r s SEAL 7-2 P9 ?87s1 V. ?'k Date S. Eric Midkiff, P. E., Unit Head S* N?••' , Project Development and Environmental Analysis Br R.C, .. elk%? 7-29- 99 q/' i2e Date Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. II. III IV. V. Type of Action I Description of The Proposed Action I Summary of Special Project Commitments 3 A. Permits 3 B. Stream Impacts 3 C. Floodway Impacts 5 D. Historic Architectural and Archaeological Effects 5 E. General Design Commitments 5 F. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations 5 G. Landscaping 6 Coordination and Comments 6 A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment 6 B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment 7 C. Public Hearing and Citizens Comments 15 Revisions to the Environmental Assessment 18 A. Typical Sections 18 B. Intersections 19 C. Design Speed 20 D. Relocatees 21 E. Thoroughfare Plan 21 F. Greenway 21 G. Retaining Wall 21 H. Stream Impacts and Proposed Culverts 21 VI. Basis For Finding of No Significant Impact 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 APPENDIX - Vicinity Map - Proposed Improvements - Proposed Roundabout - Thoroughfare Plan Map PAGE Written Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment A-1 through A-18 Notice of Public Hearing A-19 Public Hearing Handout A-20 through A-24 US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) From Marshall Street/Woodland Drive near the Waynesville City Limits to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville, Haywood County Federal Aid Project No. STP-23B(1) State Project No. 8.1942901 TIP No. R-2210 1. TYPE OF ACTION This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The FHWA and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) have determined this project will not have a significant detrimental impact on the human or natural environment. This FONSI is based on the Environmental Assessment (EA), which has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues, providing sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION The FHWA and the NCDOT propose to widen and improve US 23 Business (Old Asheville Highway) from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive, at the Waynesville City Limits, to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) (see Figure 1). This proposal will incorporate multiple typical sections along the project. The purpose of this project is to alleviate present and future anticipated traffic congestion along portions of existing US 23 Business and provide reasonable access to business properties in order to maintain/enhance economic development potential. In addition, this project is anticipated to minimally furnish community aesthetics and traffic calming measures. The proposed project is approximately 3.5 km (2.2 miles) long and has an estimated cost of $ 10,541,000, which includes $ 3,941,000 for right of way and $ 9,600,000 for construction. The proposed improvements are included in the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1999 and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2001; however, these schedules are subject to revision each year during the TIP update. For the purposes of this document, the southern project terminal will henceforth be referred to as Marshall Street, while US 23 Business will be denoted as US 23B. Additionally, improvements to US 23B will be terminated approximately 250 meters (820 feet) south of SR 1801; however, the northern project terminal will be referred to as SR 1801. The proposed project will incorporate a combination of typical sections. The proposed typical section for the segment of US 23B from Marshall Street to Ratcliff Cove Road is a three-lane curb and gutter section, including a center turn lane. A roundabout will be constructed at Ratcliff Cove Road (SR 1818). From Ratcliff Cove Road to Frances Farm Road (SR 1802), a four-lane curb and gutter, median-divided section is proposed. A median break is proposed at the Nesbitt Street intersection to allow full movement crossovers. At other locations within this section, turn will be limited to right in, right out only. From Francis Farm Road to 110 meters (360 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road (SR 1196), a five-lane curb and gutter section (including a center turn lane) is proposed. From 110 meters (360 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road to 35 meters (115 feet) south of Industrial Park Drive (SR 1267), a four-lane curb and gutter, median- divided facility is proposed, including a median break approximately 380 meters (125 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road. From 35 meters (115 feet) south of Industrial Park Drive to 400 meters (1312 feet) north of Industrial Park Drive, a five lane curb and gutter section with a center turn lane is proposed. At this point the existing 4-lane undivided facility will be resurfaced to the northern project terminal. The proposed improvements are shown in Figure 2. The existing signal at the intersection of US 23 and Marshall Street will be upgraded. New traffic signals are proposed at intersections of US 23B with Lake Junaluska Elementary School (LJES)/SR 1250 (Sims Road) and East Howell Mill Road. The intersection of US 23B with US 19-23-74 will remain signalized. All other intersecting roads will have stop sign control. The signal at the LJES/Sims Road intersection will be traffic-actuated during the beginning and end of the school day to accommodate anticipated heavy turning volumes. At all other times, the signal will flash yellow (indicating caution) on the mainline approach and flash red (indicating a stop-sign condition) on the minor street approach. At the intersection of US 23 B and Ratcliff Cove Road, a roundabout is proposed. A signalized intersection was also considered at this location. However, a roundabout is favored since the low operating speeds induced by the roundabout will reduce the number and severity of accidents and will calm traffic as it enters downtown Waynesville. Additionally, the roundabout will offer a better level of traffic service than a signalized intersection. The roundabout will require approximately the same amount of right of way as a signalized intersection. Industrial Park Drive will be realigned to tie into US 23 B approximately 70 meters (230 feet) north of its existing intersection. 2 The construction of three culverts is proposed along the project. A double barrel 3.0 meter x 2.7 meter (10' x 9') culvert will be constructed under Francis Farm Road. A double-barrel, 3.7-meter x 3.0-meter (12-foot x l 0-foot) box culvert will be constructed 110 meters (360 feet) north of Sims Circle Road. A double barrel 3.0 meter x 3.7 meter (10' x 12') culvert will be constructed under East Howell Mill Road. All three proposed structures will accommodate Raccoon Creek. The proposed structures are not required to be bottomless since trout waters will not be impacted. All other structures along the project, including pipes, will be retained and lengthened as necessary. III. SUMMARY OF SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS A. Permits Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project study area. The proposed project lies within the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watershed. Approval under Section 26a of the TVA Act would likely be required for the culvert extension and stream modifications to Raccoon Creek; approval may also be necessary for the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. The authorization of a nationwide permit by the COE is conditioned upon the concurrence of North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC). The proposed project is located in a designated "trout" county. A letter of comment has been obtained from the NCWRC concerning the proposed project for the crossing of Raccoon Creek and the unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek and is included in the EA (see Environmental Assessment, Appendix A, pages A-23 and A-24). The NCWRC states that trout do not occur at these sites and they are unaware of any other special concerns regarding the project. B. Stream Impacts Approximately 527 meters (1729 feet) of stream impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed project, due to stream relocation and culvert construction. The NCDOT will insure that new channels will be designed to resemble the old channels in width, depth, and gradient, with natural substrate covering the channel floors. Additionally, native vegetation will be planted along the stream banks to provide cover for fish and wildlife, shade for the reduction of water temperatures, and protection of the stream bank from erosion. 3 The details of stream involvement and modification will be outlined in the application for the 401 Water Quality Certification; compensatory mitigation with regard to stream mitigation is left to the discretion of DWQ. The NCDOT will coordinate with the DWQ to fulfill any necessary requirements regarding stream mitigation. Additionally, the NCWRC has the following recommendations regarding culvert construction and rechannelization at Raccoon Creek and its tributary: Adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures must be implemented and maintained on the project site to avoid impacts to downstream aquatic resources. Structures should be inspected and maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events. The reinforced concrete box culvert should be constructed so that all water flows through one cell during low flows to maintain fish passage. Cells should be buried approximately one foot below the level of the stream bottom to allow natural stream bottom material to become established in the culvert following installation. Water should be diverted through a single cell by installing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cell(s). Adequate precautions should be taken to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Uncured concrete affects water quality and is toxic to fish and other organisms. Stormwater should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long- term erosion control. To minimize surface water impacts, the proposed project will include: Consideration of decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of right-of-way widths and fill slopes. - Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands. Reduction of clearing and grubbing activities in and adjacent to bodies of water. - Reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into streams. Minimization of "in-stream" activities. 4 C. Floodway Impacts If encroachment or fill placement in the 100-year floodway is necessary, the NCDOT will insure that no increase in the base flood discharge elevations will occur. The NCDGT will coordinate with USCOE and the NCWRC during final hydraulic design to insure that any environmental concerns are appropriately addressed, and with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations. D. Historic Architectural and Archaeological Effects The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has concurred with the FHWA's determination that the project, as proposed, will not have an adverse effect on the Miller- Francis House provided the following conditions are incorporated into the plans and special provisions: Installation of protective fencing along the property frontage (existing right of way) easement line. If roots are encountered during construction, the contractor is required to cleanly cut them and exercise good tree protection practices. The SHPO has also concurred with the FHWA's determination that the proposed project will not involve significant archaeological resources. E. General Design Commitments Plans for any water line relocations will be submitted to the Division of Environmental Health for approval. F. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations. It is anticipated that 1.5-meter (5-foot) wide sidewalks will be provided on the west side of US 23 Business from Marshall Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road). A municipal agreement regarding cost participation will be established between the Town of Waynesville and the NCDGT. NCDOT will coordinate with the Richland Creek Greenway Trail Commission during the project's final design, as necessary, concerning possible greenway trail construction in the project vicinity. Throughout the entire project, outside travel lanes of 4.2 meters (14 feet) in width will be provided to accommodate bicycle traffic. Since the project will be constructed as a curb and gutter facility, bicycle-safe grates will be provided throughout the project. G. Landscaping The proposed improvements will impact oak trees (World War I Memorial Pin Oaks) located along US 23 B in the vicinity of the Ratcliff Cove Road intersection and a memorial plaque. NCDOT will replant similar type trees in the vicinity of the proposed roundabout at the Ratcliff Cove Road intersection and relocate the plaque. IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment The EA was approved by the Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways on July 28, 1997. The approved EA was circulated to the following federal, state, and local agencies for review and comments. An asterisk (*) indicates that a response was received from that agency. Copies of the correspondence received are included in the Appendix of this document. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation U. S. Army Corps of Engineers * U. S. Department of the Interior U. S. Environmental Protection Agency * Tennessee Valley Authority * N. C. Department of Administration * Intergovernmental Review Department of Cultural Resources * N. C. Department of Crime Control and Public Safety Division of Emergency Management * N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources * Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs * Division of Waste Management * Division of Water Quality Division of Land Resources N. C. Department of Human Resources N. C. Department of Public Instruction N. C. Geological Survey N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission Haywood County Board of Commissioners Haywood County Planning Department * Town of Waynesville 6 B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment Written comments on the EA were received from seven (7) agencies. The following are excerpts of the substantive comments with responses, where appropriate. 1. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildli a Service Comment: "We concur that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the proposed project, if project objectives are to be met. We also concur with the State Historic Preservation Officer's determination that the Preferred Alternative 2 will have no adverse effect on the Miller-Francis House, which is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, on condition that (1) A protective fencing is installed along the right-of- way and, (2) Good tree protection practices are undertaken. These two conditions should be included in the final plans of the proposed project. "The Department of the Interior has no objection to the approval of the proposed project by the Department of Transportation." Response: The proposed typical section change.described in Section V of this report will reduce the number of lanes and the project's footprint in the vicinity of the Miller-Frances House. In this area, US 23B will be upgraded to a 3-lane, curb and gutter facility instead of the previously proposed 5-lane section. NCDOT will insure that the conditions included in the letter stating the project will have "no adverse effect" on the Miller- Francis House will be adhered to. 2. Tennessee Valley Authori (TVA) TVA) Comment: "On page iii, Permits Required, page 16, Special Permits Required, and page 42, permit requirements, the language [regarding] TVA [involvement] should be replaced by a statement that an approval under Section 26a of the TVA Act would likely be required for the culvert extension and stream modifications to Raccoon Creek and perhaps an unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek." Response: See Section III.A of this document for the revision pertaining to this comment. 3. N C Department of Crime Control and Public Safety. Division of Emerpency Management MUM) "Any portion of the proposed project that affects the regulatory [100-year] floodplain as shown on the published Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) must be constructed in accordance with the Local Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. "Any portion of the proposed project that affects the floodway as determined by [FIRM] maps for any specific area should obtain a `No Impact Certification' or a `Conditional Letter of Map Revision' (CLOMR) or must fully comply with part 65.7 of 44 CFR. All CLOMR or LOMR requests must approved by the local officials prior to being submitted to FEMA." Response: The NCDOT will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA, and local authorities during final design to insure proper compliance with applicable floodplain and floodway regulations in this area. 4. N. C DgRartment of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Waste Management (DffM) "[The Division of Waste Management (DWM) has] completed the review of the attached information on the subject project for the proximity to CERCLIS or inactive hazardous waste sites. The subject project involves the widening of US 23 Business to a five-lane road from the Waynesville City limits northward to 0.25 mile north of [SR 1267] Industrial Park Drive. The remaining section of the road would be slightly realigned and have resurfacing improvements. The entire length of affected road is 2.2 miles long, originating from the city limits northward to [SR 1801] Jerry Liner Road. Six sites were found within a four-mile radius of this project's corridor. These sites are described below and are denoted on the attached map. "The Schulhoiffer Junkyard (NCD 024 852 675) is 0.5 [mile] west of the road project. The Haywood County Landfill (NCD 981 474 190) is 0.3 [mile] east of the project. Both the Dayco Corp. site (NCD 003 148 798) and the Dayco Landfill Crymes Cove Road (NCD 982 119 463) site are about 3.0 and 2.0 miles, respectively, south of the project. All these four aforementioned sites have been removed from CERCLIS by the Brownfields Initiative. They are still on the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch list. Both the Benfield Industries NPL Site (NCD 981 026 479) and the A. C. Lawrence Leather Company Site (NCO 000 195 701) are 2.5 miles southwest of the project. The latter has been given a No Further Action status from the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch. "There are no known hazardous waste generators on the proposed route, however there is a stream and several gasoline stations, one which was closed a few years ago, and an LP gas provider. "One incident occurred several years ago at the Haywood County Health Department. It consisted of emergency response in the removal of potentially explosive ether, but was without incident at the time. "After reviewing the file information, the DWM believes it is unlikely that the project will affect the sites or vice versa." Response: After performing a reconnaissance survey and records search, NCDOT agrees with DWM's assessment that the project is unlikely to affect underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites. 5. DENR, Division of Water Quality "The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands. The proposed work would involve no fill in wetlands. Potential impacts to two perennial streams were not quantified. DWQ offers the following comments based on the document review: A) This project will involve culvert extension and/or channel changes at two locations. The potential linear distances of these stream impacts were not included in the EA. If the culverts and/or channel changes exceed 150 feet linear distance of stream at either crossing, stream mitigation will be required in accordance with current DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)). If necessary, said stream mitigation proposal should be included with 9 the permit application. The Wetland Restoration Program will be available to use for stream mitigation for this project. B) DWQ asks NCDOT to stipulate that borrow material will be taken from upland sources in the construction contract awarded for this project. "Based upon the wetland and stream impacts described in the EA, General Certification 3103 will be applicable to this project. Please be aware that this is contingent upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary." Response: As a result of more detailed hydraulic studies it has been determined that the proposed project will result in 527 meters (1729 feet) of stream impacts due to culvert construction and stream rechannelization. The location of the stream impacts are described below. Pipe relocation under US 23 B and stream relocation along US 23B from east of Ratcliff Road to Nesbitt Street: 275 meters (902') Culvert replacement under Francis Farm Road and stream relocation along the north side of Francis Farm Road: 41 meters (135") Culvert replacement under US 23 B and stream relocation along the west side of US 23 B: 120 meters (394") Culvert replacement under East Howell Mill Road and temporary pipes for on-site detour for East Howell Mill Road: 21 meters (69') - Pipe removal and stream improvements south of relocated Industrial Drive: 30 meters (98') Pipe removal and replacement under US 23 B, north of East Howell Mill Road: 40 meters (131') The reason for the increase in stream impacts is due to the identification of another surface water after the completion of the environmental assessment. This stream originates west of US 23 B where it is enclosed in pipe to accommodate residential development in the area. The stream channel opens up east of US 23 B near the intersection of 10 Ratcliff Cove Road. During the field inspection for the environmental assessment, this water resource was presumed to be a drainage channel. However, upon recent inspection, this water resource was determined to be a jurisdictional surface water pursuant to guidance provided by the Division of Water Quality. The channel has been highly modified to facilitate drainage from project area roadways, and commercial and residential properties. The stream channel is approximately 4.6 meters (15') wide, and 1.5 to 1.8 meter (5' to 6') deep. Bankfull width is approximately 0.9 to 1.2 meter (3' to 4'). On July 13, 1998 the observed stream depth was 6.3 centimeters (2.5"). The streambed is composed of rubble, gravel, sand, and silt. The stream impacts stated above include the water resources identified in the environmental assessment as well as the recently discovered stream channel. It should be noted that the majority of the stream impacts will result from stream relocation instead of enclosing stream channels in a pipe or culvert. Additionally, proposed improvements call for removing some existing pipes and placing the stream in an open channel. Based on the estimated values of linear stream impacts and potential culvert impacts, stream mitigation may be necessary. The NCDOT will coordinate with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and the USFWS to fulfill the necessary requirements of mitigating and/or avoiding stream impacts. Additionally, the NCDOT will stipulate that borrow material will be taken from upland sources in the construction contract awarded for this project. 6. N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) Comment: "[The] NCWRC supports the use of existing roadway corridors for transportation improvements over development of new roadway corridors. Primary impacts to fish and wildlife resources involve the loss of stream and upland habitat, sedimentation of aquatic habitat from construction activities, and the loss of additional habitat associated with secondary development along the highway corridor. "The EA provides extensive information on biotic communities and impacted aquatic habitat. Direct project impacts associated with II project construction are adequately described to allow our review of the proposed alternatives; however, the EA is unclear on the total footage of stream impacts associated with the project. On page iii, Section 7, Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts, paragraph 2, the EA indicates that 40 in (135 feet) of stream modifications will be made to Raccoon Creek. On page 40, paragraph 5, the EA indicates 40 in (135 feet) of stream impacts due to culvert placement and 100 in (330 feet) of stream channelization and/or relocation. Also on page 41, [an] additional 10 in (33 feet) of unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek will be impacted as a result of pipe extension. This additional 363 linear feet of stream channel impacts should be included in the Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts (Section 7) on page iii. "The NCWRC cannot concur with a FONSI until the total linear feet of impacted stream channel is confirmed. If channel relocation is involved, we [ask] that the new channel be constructed in a dry work area and stabilized before water is diverted. We ask that the new channel be designed to resemble the old channel in width, depth, and gradient and that natural substrate, not rip-rap, be used in the channel floor. Native trees and shrubs should be planted along the stream bank to provide cover for fish and wildlife, provide shade to reduce water temperatures, and protect the stream bank from erosion. "It is correctly noted in the EA that Haywood County is recognized as a `trout water county' by the Corps of Engineers (COE) and a 404 permit will be required for this project. The NCWRC will review any Nationwide or General permit associated with this project and recommends that impacts to streams or wetlands be avoided wherever possible. In the case of unavoidable losses, we will recommend mitigation as a condition of the 404 permit. Subsequent project documentation should provided a conceptual plan for such mitigation, detailing efforts to restore or enhance the riparian areas associated with Raccoon Creek and its tributaries. "In addition, the NC WRC has the following recommendations and they should be included in the 404 permit application: 1. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures must be implemented and maintained on the project site to avoid impacts to downstream aquatic resources. Structures should be inspected and maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events. 2. The reinforced concrete box culvert should be constructed so that all water flows through one cell during low flows to 12 maintain fish passage. Cells should be buried approximately one foot below the level of the stream bottom to allow natural stream bottom material to become established in the culvert following installation. Water should be diverted through a single cell by installing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cell(s). Adequate precautions should be taken to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Uncured concrete affects water quality and is toxic to fish and other organisms. 4. Stormwater should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. 5. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control." Response: With respect to the anticipated linear distances of stream impacts and channelization, refer to the response to DENR, Division of Water Quality (DWQ) above. The NCDOT will insure that the new channel will be designed to resemble the old channel in width, depth, and gradient, with natural substrate covering the channel floor. Additionally, native vegetation will be planted along the stream bank to provide cover for fish and wildlife, shade for the reduction of water temperatures, and protection of the stream bank from erosion. Currently, no wetland impacts are associated with this project. However, stream impacts will be avoided wherever possible and, if necessary, mitigated if unavoidable. The NCDOT will include the NCWRC recommendations in the Section 404 permit application and in the Environmental and Special Project Commitments section of this document (see Section III.A.). 7. Henry B. Foy, Mayor of Waynesville Comment: `Earlier this month, a series of meetings were held in our community with the focus on how to make it more desirable to walk, ride 13 bicycles, and slow the speeds of traffic on roadways in our area. Dan Burden, a traffic specialist, conducted these meetings and placed great emphasis on how the citizens of a community can become involved in the planning process of highway construction. By doing so, it is possible to prevent a highway from being overbuilt or being so wide with asphalt that motorists tend to travel much faster than is desirable. "On [October 9, 19971, a group of approximately 75 citizens met at Town Hall to discuss the Asheville Road Project [improvements to US 23 Business]. They were in unanimous agreement that additional studies should be conducted prior to preparing the final plans for this project. The group would like to propose that an intense planning effort be made possible by the D.O.T. to reconsider the design of this road, and at the same time allow the citizens of our area to be involved in the planning process by employing a technique for public involvement called a "Charrette". This charrette would be financed by the D.O.T. at a quoted price of about $ 30,000. This cost could save the D.O.T. several times the amount spent. "After we enter this planning process, there will be plenty of time to carefully consider what type of road width is needed in view of the current and projected daily traffic counts and the present and potential uses along that road. "This would provide a very attractive artery into Waynesville, and would also provide for future similar improvement to the intersecting Howell Mill Road which will cross Russ Avenue, connect to the Old Dellwood Road and the Boyd Avenue bridge (running behind Giles Chemical) which project is already on the [Transportation Improvement Program]. This would also provide another much needed artery into Central Waynesville as well as to the Hazelwood area. "We have a lot or roadwork that is needed in Waynesville. Waynesville is growing and we want to provide quality growth. Infrastructure MUST KEEP UP WITH GROWTH and we are committed to making Waynesville and its surrounding area attractive and an area our people can enjoy to the utmost." Response: The NCDOT shares the Town of Waynesville's commitment to plan, design, and construct a highway facility that is best suited to meet the pedestrian, cycling and vehicular transportation needs along the project corridor. In addition, the department has been entrusted with constructing 14 a facility that will contribute to a beneficial impact on the overall road network in the project study area, and in neighboring communities as well. The NCDOT appreciates the Town of Waynesville's recommendation for a "Charrette"; however, the department has determined that this process is an accelerated version of the planning, design, and approval process that is currently utilized for all proposed NCDOT highway projects. A need for additional coordination between the Town of Waynesville and the NCDOT being evident, the department developed and submitted additional designs for consideration that involved "combination" widening of existing US 23 Business. The NCDOT then presented the revised designs to the citizens of Waynesville during an NCDOT conducted Project Development Workshop (PDW), the purpose of which was to solicit citizen input on the proposal, as well as encourage ideas on how to more effectively implement the proposal. After evaluating the feasibility of the new alternate and reviewing and implementing feasible requests made during the PDW, the Town of Waynesville and the NCDOT concur that the initial recommendation (5- lane widening for the entire project length) should be dropped from further consideration. Therefore, the recommendation to widen US 23 Business utilizing variable typical sections throughout the study corridor should be implemented as described in this report. The initial recommendation for this project included the provision of 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside travel lanes to accommodate bicycles and a 1.5-meter (5-foot) sidewalk on the west side of US 23 Business, from Marshall Street to SR 1196 (East Howell Mill Road). The proposals for bicycle and pedestrian accommodations are still recommended for this project. The Town of Waynesville, in coordination with Haywood County Officials have agreed to cost sharing participation in the construction of the pedestrian facilities. C. Public Hearing, Project Development Workshop, and Citizens Comments Following circulation of the EA, a public hearing was conducted in Waynesville at Lake Junaluska High School on October 21, 1997. (See the Appendix for a copy of the public hearing notice and a copy of the handout for the hearing.) To solicit additional citizen input on project revisions, a Project Development Workshop was held on May 19, 1998. Approximately 250 citizens and 11 NCDOT representatives attended the public hearing, and approximately 150 citizens and 11 NCDOT representatives attended the project development workshop. The questions and concerns expressed at both the hearing and project development workshop dealt with the type of highway facility proposed, conducting additional public involvement meetings (charrette), and the incorporation of pedestrian and bicycling facilities in conjunction with this project. 15 Some of these questions and comments were adequately answered during the hearing/workshop; the remainder of the comments is addressed in this document. Several comments were received during the official commenting periods following the two meetings. Transcripts of both the hearing and workshop are on file with the N. C: Division of Highways. A general excerpt of the substantive comments expressed from citizens commenting on the project, along with the corresponding NCDOT responses, is summarized below. Citizens of the Town of Waynesville's Comments Several citizens were concerned that the typical section proposed for the new highway is too wide and will convert US 23B to a "high speed corridor." Other concerns include the fear that the proposed width of US 23B will increase dangers for children who attend Lake Junaluska Elementary School (LJES), siting that increased roadway width will promote higher speeds. Subsequently, the higher anticipated vehicular speeds along US 23B would not be conducive to cycling or pedestrian movements along the project corridor. Additionally, implementation of the project should include the proposal for a signal at the LJES entrance to provide safer vehicular traffic flow in and out of the school. Citizens were also concerned that the proposed roadway width will eliminate the small town atmosphere and promote strip-commercial development. Furthermore; there is citizen resentment regarding the anticipated removal of local landmarks, such as the "historic oaks" located along US 23B in the vicinity of SR 1818 (Ratcliff Cove Road), in conjunction with this project. The widening of US 23B to five-lanes will negatively impact the community through the elimination of its "small-town appeal" and dissection and separation of neighborhoods on either side of the widened roadway. A few citizens were concerned about logical termini; the originally designed five-lane widening would begin at the north side of the US 23B/Marshall Street/Woodland Drive intersection. On the south side of this intersection, the typical section would have only three lanes, tapering down to two lanes. The concern was that five lanes of traffic cannot successfully merge into two lanes in such a short distance; therefore, bottlenecking at the intersection will result. The Town of Waynesville has embraced the prospect of implementing a charrette process to assist the NCDOT and local officials in determining the most efficient and cost effective improvements along US 23B to best meet the purpose and need of the project. Based on the type of improvements town officials envision for the US 23B corridor (sidewalks on both sides of US 23B, bicycle lanes, and a landscaped median in the center of US 23B), the charrette would confirm that these improvements will optimize transportation needs in the project 16 area. The town encourages the NCDOT to sanction and participate in the adoption of a charrette for this area. Response: Following coordination with the Town of Waynesville and Haywood County officials, and as a result of comments received at the October 21, 1997 Public Hearing, and the May 19, 1998 Project Development Workshop, the NCDOT has revised the previously recommended improvements to incorporate variable (three) typical sections in conjunction with the current proposal. This alternate generally follows the same alignment and termini as the proposal recommended in the EA. The proposed improvements are described in Section II of this document. The revised recommendation (Alternate 2) involves the construction of a three-lane roadway (including a center turn lane), four-lane roadway (with a raised grassed median), and a five-lane roadway (including a center turn lane). NCDOT determined the most beneficial and feasible locations for each typical section after considering input from the public and local officials. The 3-lane section will provide a transition from the proposed roundabout at Ratcliff Cove Road into downtown Waynesville. The 3-lane section in conjunction with the proposed roundabout at Ratcliff Cove Road will calm traffic as it enters downtown Waynesville, while also preserving Waynesville's small town community atmosphere. The proposed 4-lane section with a median will accommodate anticipated traffic demands as well as provide an aesthetically pleasing facility, which citizens and local officials promote as part of the purpose and need of this project. The 5-lane section is proposed where businesses are more concentrated and continuous left turn capability and access is critical for economic viability. Posted speed limits and enforcement of those limits are the responsibility of the local municipality. Additionally, the widening of existing US 23B is not anticipated to cause additional hazards for children attending Lake Junaluska Elementary School (LJES); clearly marked school crosswalks will be incorporated in the project, and a signal will be erected at the main entrance to LJES (as requested by citizens and local officials). Additionally, pedestrian refuge islands will be constructed at this intersection. The zoning along the proposed project is mixed and includes industrial, commercial, and residential zoning, with residential being predominant. It is the responsibility of the local authorities to implement zoning regulations that promote the type of development desired in the project area. Although the construction/improvement of highway facilities may encourage development 17 along project corridors, zoning ordinances, developed by the appropriate local authorities, restricts this development. Impacts to the historic oaks located in the vicinity of the Ratcliff Cove Road intersection are unavoidable. NCDOT will replant similar type trees in the vicinity of the proposed roundabout at Ratcliff Cove Road. Additionally, the commemorative plaque located in this vicinity will be relocated. The NCDOT also understands citizen's concerns regarding the southern project terminal, where bottlenecking is anticipated as a result of the number of lanes decreasing in this area. The proposed new design will likely ease potential bottlenecking to the south of the project compared to the previously proposed design. The department anticipates that the traffic calming measures induced by beginning the transition from four lanes to three lanes at Ratcliff Cove Road, as well as the construction of a roundabout at this intersection, will minimize the severity of bottlenecking to the south of the project. The NCDOT also appreciates the citizens of Waynesville, as well as officials representing the Town of Waynesville, sharing the charrette plan; however, the NCDOT has determined the charrette to be an accelerated version of the design and public involvement process currently practiced by the department. Although the department concludes that it would not be a beneficial allocation of funds to endorse and participate in a charrette for this project, the department does agree to participate in further discussions with town officials and citizens regarding the most profitable method of implementing the recommended construction alternate. V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A. Tvtnical Section The EA states that the typical section for the proposed project is a five-lane, 20.4-meter (68-foot) travelway with curb and gutter. However, through coordination with the Town of Waynesville, Haywood County officials, and the citizens of Waynesville and Haywood County, the proposed project will incorporate a combination of typical sections. These typical sections are described below. From Marshall Street to Ratcliff Cove Road: 3-lane, 13.2-meter (44-foot) face to face curb and gutter section. From Ratcliff Cove Road to Francis Farm Road: 4-lane, divided curb and gutter section with 7.8 meters (28 feet) of pavement in each direction separated by a 4.8-meter (16-foot) raised grass median. 18 From Francis Farm Road to 110 meters (360 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road: 5-lane, 20.4-meter (67-foot) curb and gutter section with center turn lane. From 110 meters (360 feet) north of East Howell Mill Road to 35 meters (115 feet) south of Industrial Park Drive: 4-lane, divided curb and gutter section with 7.8 meters (28 feet) of pavement in each direction separated by a 4.8-meter (16-foot) raised grass median. From 35 meters (115 feet) south of Industrial Park Drive to 400 meters (1312 feet) north of Industrial Park Drive: 5-lane, 20.4-meter (67-foot) curb and gutter section with center turn lane. From 400 meters (1312 feet) north of Industrial Park Drive to the northern project terminal, the existing 4-lane, undivided roadway will be resurfaced. All typical sections will have 4.2-meter (14-foot) outside lanes to accommodate bicycles. B. Intersections Since the approval of the EA for the subject project, the following intersection revisions are proposed: Ratcliff Cove Road: A roundabout is proposed at the intersection of Ratcliff Cove Road and US 23 B. A standard stop sign controlled intersection was proposed in the EA and at the public hearing. Local officials and citizens requested a roundabout at this location. After performing more detailed studies, the Department believes that a roundabout at Ratcliff Cove Road would operate at a better level of traffic service (providing less delay) than a conventional signalized intersection, improve safety, as well as provide traffic calming and improved aesthetics as requested by local officials and citizens. The proposed roundabout is shown in Figure 3. Roundabouts are circular intersections with specific design and traffic control features that distinguish them from old traffic circles. The modern roundabout is smaller, with adequate deflection to achieve slower entry and circulating speeds. Entry vehicles yield to vehicles already in the circulating roadway. A roundabout also reduces the number of conflict points at an intersection. For example, for a four-legged intersection, the number of conflict points is reduced from 32 to 8. These differences improve the safety characteristics of the roundabout by reducing the number and particularly the severity of crashes. The safety performance of roundabouts has been proven in many countries around the world, and has been initially confirmed within the United States. Roundabouts often operate with lower delays than other intersection forms and control types, which is the case with the currently proposed roundabout for this project. With a roundabout, it is often unnecessary for traffic to come to a complete stop. When 19 there are queues on one or more approaches, traffic within the queues usually continues to move, and this is typically more tolerable to drivers than a stopped or standing queue. Roundabouts will likely have a higher initial cost at an existing intersection compared to a signalized intersection, although the elimination of auxiliary turn lanes needed for a signalized intersection may result in more favorable installation cost comparisons. At new installations, the difference in cost is likely to be less. Compared to signalized intersections, a roundabout does not have signal equipment that requires constant power, regular equipment maintenance and regular signal timing updates, resulting in lower ongoing maintenance costs. Analysis of the intersection of US 23 Business at Ratcliff Cove Road indicates that a two-lane roundabout would operate better in the design year of 2017 than a comparable signal. A single lane roundabout would work adequately for about fifteen years before reaching an unacceptable level of service. A single lane roundabout is recommended at this time, however, sufficient right of way will be acquired to provide a two-lane roundabout when traffic demand warrants such action. Lake Junaluska Elementary School Entrance/Sims Circle: Signalization is now proposed for this intersection. A signal will be added at this location as a result of public and local official requests. Additionally, pedestrian refuge islands are proposed at this location. Industrial Park Drive: At the public hearing this road was proposed to be relocated to intersect US 23 B approximately 50 meters (170 feet) to the north of the existing intersection. After further design studies, it was determined that Industrial Park Drive would need to be relocated to intersect US 23 B approximately 20 meters (65 feet) further to the north than was previously proposed. This realignment revision was necessary to provide acceptable vertical curvature. This revision will result in one additional residential relocatee. C. Design Speed Along the southern section of the project between Marshall Street and Ratcliff Cove Road, the design speed has been reduced, thus allowing for a tighter radius of the curvature of the proposed alignment of US 23B in the vicinity of the Miller-Francis Historic Property. This revision will result in less right of way impacts along both sides of US 23 B and will require three fewer relocatees than anticipated during the pubic hearing. NCDOT investigated reducing the design speed of the entire project at the request of the Town. However, it was determined that reducing the overall design speed would have no benefits with regard to the substantial reduction of right-of-way impacts, business and/or residential relocatees, or a less hazardous alignment. Therefore, this proposal was dropped from further consideration. Therefore, the design speed along US 23B, from Marshall Street to Ratcliff Cove Road will be 65 km/h (40 mph) and 72 km/h (45 mph) for the remainder of the project. 20 D. Relocatees It appears that the proposed curve realignment in the vicinity of the Miller- Frances Historic property will result in three fewer business relocatees than was anticipated at the public hearing. The realignment of Industrial Park Drive will result in one additional residential relocatee, which was not anticipated at the public hearing. Updated information regarding relocatees will be available during the development of final right-of-way plans. E. Thoroughfare Plan The thoroughfare plan map for Waynesville/Hazelwood (plan approved June 1980)„ which was included in the EA, is outdated. An updated thoroughfare plan map for the Town of Waynesville (plan approved October 1996) is included in this report (see Figure 4). F. Greenway The Richland Creek Greenway Trail is a proposed multi-use greenway trail from Lake Junaluska to the Waynesville Park. The NCDOT (in conjunction with the Town of Waynesville) is proposing sidewalks as part of the US 23 B transportation improvement project. The proposed sidewalks along the project will benefit the proposed greenway. The greenway was acknowledged in the EA in Figure 2A and was also considered as part of the justification for NCDOT to participate in the funding of sidewalks pursuant to NCDOT's Pedestrian Policy. However, this information was not presented in the EA. NCDOT will coordinate with the Richland Creek Greenway Trail Committee concerning possible greenway trail construction in the project vicinity. G. Retaining Wall After further design studies, it was determined that an additional 80-meter (260- foot) long retaining wall will be necessary along the west side of US 23 B near the project's northern terminal. H. Stream Impacts and Proposed Culverts In the Environmental Assessment it was stated that the proposed project will result in 140 meters (460 feet) of stream impacts due to culvert replacement and stream rechannelization. After more detailed hydraulic studies it has been determined that the proposed project will result in 527 meters (1729 feet) of stream impacts due to culvert construction and rechannelization. The locations of the stream impacts are described below. None of the stream impacts will involve trout waters. 21 Pipe relocation under US 23 B and stream relocation along US 23B from east of Ratcliff Road to Nesbitt Street: 275 meters (902') Culvert replacement under Francis Farm Road and stream relocation along the north side of Francis Farm Road: 41 meters (135") Culvert replacement under US 23 B and stream relocation along the west side of US 23 B: 120 meters (394") - Culvert replacement under East Howell Mill Road and temporary pipes for on-site detour for East Howell Mill Road: 21 meters (69') Pipe removal and stream improvements south of relocated Industrial Drive: 30 meters (98') Pipe removal and replacement under US 23 B, north of East Howell Mill Road: 40 meters (131') Additionally, the EA stated that the proposed project would require one new culvert. After further hydraulic studies, it was determined that the proposed project would require the construction of three new culverts. A double barrel 3.0 meter x 2.7 meter (10' x 9') culvert will be constructed under Francis Farm Road. A double-barrel, 3.7-meter x 3.0-meter (12-foot x 10-foot) culvert will be constructed 110 meters (360 feet) north of Sims Circle Road. A double barrel 3.0 meter x 3.7 meter (10' x 12') culvert will be constructed under East Howell Mill Road. All three proposed structures will accommodate Raccoon Creek. The proposed structures are not required to be bottomless since trout waters will not be impacted. For a more in depth discussion of the stream impacts associated with this project, see Section IV.B.5, responding to DENR comments. VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project, as documented in the EA, and upon comments from federal, state, and local agencies, it is the finding of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) that the project will not have a significant impact upon the quality of the human or natural environment. The project is not controversial from an environmental standpoint. No significant impacts on natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources are expected. In view of the above evaluation, it has been determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Neither an Environmental Impact Statement nor further environmental analysis is required. SEM 22 ' A ?rln' Sterling ]O?II f Se 75 1 L ca/reek ,A , ile a ley P _ i....,.. err.. ? ` • • • ? (\ r .3- M, 3 `?. HAYWOOD COUNTY 7II 0 a J Branch 1 173f Y lilt O i r.n 1 D .0-41 anti or' / 7 / 1 -- T 023 ) //i-? \\11 `/?? ` f » ens q 1 I 1221 1 D3 w. J.2Z7. _ all I ill t oy 1716 1 o? a, n" !271 i u- tem Rw" 1e1 ?,A BEGIN PROJECT ?a oo, END PROJECT C ULVERT ?. v WAYNESVILLE POP. a,7e§ r. .22 ili4 1 21 I9» !!!? Elitebelh 1 UUK' lsfti 27 LIU 1>u N WAYNES117LLE QUAD 9" Ilo7? ? ZI NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION' OF HIGHWAYS ` PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH US 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSHALL STREET/WOODLAND DRIVE) TO SOUTH OF SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD) NEAR WAYNESVILLE„ HAYWOOD COUNTY TIP NO. R-2210 A 0 KILOMETERS 0.8 0 MILES 0.5 FIG. I H z 4 W O ?r Na0 ?? ??? ? C?7Aw wax a ?' O a 1 i L 133HS , NN O "'o z ?o w F J a.? -i 0 G. •N/Y SYY'0 I I ?? I no?,l 1 W I ,` I r? , e? .1S Il E ? I- '-, T ! L,? N SS78'rN I NI s ' z 3 ???LLL c ' T v I I a ? r SS . Sco 3 vl +rl O H::1 E J `I 1!1 N lY w ?? y U W II _._ f.t ' I t I ti I lY1C RIN 1 i - _.J•' ]L W Q V y, O 0 vw 1 4 I I S • ~ rc a E r I 1 r 8* 4QQ'*} i'! N ~il0 I O O ?_.. / E"q O A 04 M •Mr-?.1 W a 0 ? /tee ?toa; / -• `: try' ??;?J 1'J /rri ?ul ^ '. I t !" - '? ell r ° ce - ---- - 10 -' ----- U 00 AN y h ? / ti) I.I I ? / 1' i r ' J,I.I r7l .. N? 1 I S / ','/'? r r•1,?, I 'I I' 1 I • _ o ice2 N/7NJ1? . I ; I •`' '" SW ? Y,h 'r . •a 2 APPENDIX .' f. - United States Department of the Interior a, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 ='ER-97/570 Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E. KV 19 Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410 Raleigh, North Carolina 27001 Dear Mr. Graf: This is in response to the request for the Depar*ment v --= t..__ ?......... ? Luc IiiLerior°s comments on the Environmental Assessment for US-23 (Ashville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshal Street/Woodland Drive) to SR-1801 (Jerry Liner Road), near Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina. We concur that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the proposed project, if project objectives are to be met. We also concur with the State Historic Preservation Officer's determination that the Preferred Alternative 2 will have no adverse effect on the Miller-Francis House, which is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, on condition that (1) A protective fencing is installed along the right-of-way and, (2) Good tree protection practices are undertaken. These two conditions should be included in the final plans of the proposed project. The Department of the Interior has no objection to the approval of the proposed project by the Department of Transportation. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. Sincerely, __-) Willie R. Taylor Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance cc: Mr. Franklin Vick, P.E. Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways Transportation Building Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 A-1 Tennessee Valley Authority -11C %% es; Summa Hill Dm e, Knox\,ille. Tenre??_ 371?_•C_' -1499 October 15, 1997 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch North Carolina Division of Highways Post Office Box 25201 Raieigh, North Carolina 27611 Dear Mr. Vick: G?.I vi `rte CCT 1 7 1997 z 4 p?VfSl:?`1',' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) - U.S. 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSH_-\LL STREET/WOODLAND DRIVE) TO SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD), PIGEON RIVER TRIBUTARY, HAYWOOD COUNTY, FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO, STP-23B(1), STATE PROJECT NO. 8.194290 1, TIP NO. R-2210A Thank you for the opportunity to review the EA for improvements to U.S. 23 Business across Raccoon Creek near Waynesville. It appears that the major issues have been addressed. At this time, we have the following suggestion. • On page iii, Permits Required, page 16, Special Permits Required, and page 42, permit requirements, the language on TVA should be replaced by a statement that an approval under Section 26a of the TVA Act would likely be required for the culvert extension and stream modifications to Raccoon Creek and perhaps an unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek. Should you have any questions, please contact Harold M. Draper at (423) 632-6889 cr hmdraper@tva.gov. Sincerely, 8u Jon oney, nager Environmental Management A-2 prrnt.V l M? ,4. /?.Yr l nltkv North Carolina r? rooram Det,elon .- Department of Administrafiioir--- "` ?' James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary October 30, 1997 Mr. Whit Webb N.C. Department of Transportation Program Development Branch Transportation Building Raleigh. NC 27611 l , 1: NOV - G97 ?G 9 Dear Mr. Webb: Re: SCH File # 98-E-4220-0250; Environmental Assessment Proposed Widening of and Improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Rd.) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall St./Woodland Drive) to SR. 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd.) near Waynesville, NC; TIP R-2210A The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intemovernmental Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (919) 733-7232. Sincerely, Attachments cc: Region A Melba McGee, DEHNR ?G s I V 1997 .r.. n.; FiC f:.w'J?•rr.1 i J 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 Telephone 919-733-7232 An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer Mrs. Chrys BaQQett, Director N. C. State Clearinghouse A-3 1VVri-" 1_C i?-L-?V" •J 1111 L' l_-"".L%l IN Vi1V ? -- DEPART,IENT OF AD,SINISTRATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley Clearinghouse Coordinator Dept. of Cultural Resources Archives-History Bldg. Raleigh NC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION Dept. of Agriculture Dept. of Crime Cont./ Public Safety Dept. of Cultural Resources Dept. of Env. Health, & Natural Res Dept. of Transportation Southwestern NC Plan & Econ Dev Com PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation TYPE:-National Environmental Policy Act ERD: Environmental Assessment STATE K DER 1 98-?=:220-0250_.` F02 DATE RECEIVED: 09/30/1997 r, AGENCY RESPONSE: 10/27/1997 REVIEW CLOSED: 10/30/1997 /?/'?q- r / yl • C l?% ??--? 11 11 :I V? DESC: Proposed Widening of and Improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Rd.) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall St./Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Rd.) near Waynesville, NC; TIP TMR-2210A CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 95-E-4220-0889 The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by th= above indicated date. if additional review time is needed, please contact t_`__s office at (919)733-7232. AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED F-1 SIGNED BY: V?.AA_ DATE : OCT 1 0 0- A-4 Cf ^ E 1997 k r Zw ??Y BSc North Carolina Department of Crime - 3 lo. Program Development Branch Control a-n-d-F-u7T-ic-S-aT-ZT7 Division of Emergency Management James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Richard H. Moore. Secretary Dept of Crime Control & Public Safety Division of Emergencv Management National Flood Insurance Program STATE NUMBER:98-E-4220-0250 APPLICANT: NC DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION DESC: PROPOSEDWIDENING OF AND IMPROVEMENTS TO US 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE RD.) FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSHALL ST./WOODLAND DR.) TO SR 1801 (JEERY LINER RD.) NEAR WAYNESVILLE, NC; TIP 9R-2210A Any portion of the proposed project that affects the regulatory 100 year floodplain as shown on the published Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) must be constructed in accordance with the Local Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Any portion of the proposed project that affects the floodway as determined by firm maps for any specific area should obtain a "No Impact Certification" or a "Conditional Letter of Map Revision" (CLOMR) or must fully comply with part 65.7 of 44 CFR. All CLOMR or LOMR requests must approved by the local officials prior to being submitted to FEMA. lik Lwayl? ' Division of Emergency Management - NFIP (919) 733-5392 Date A-6 116 West Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-1335 • Telephone (919) 733.3867 An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer State of North Carolina w4J Department of Environment and Natural Resources Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs ` r. James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor R DEN Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Richard E. Rogers, Jr., Director MEMORANDUM TO: Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse FROM: Melba McGee Project Review Coordinator RE: 98-0250 EA US 23 Business Improvements, Haywood County DATE: October 29, 1997 The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed the proposed Environmental Assessment. In order to avoid delays in the review of the FONSI, we recommend that the attached comments be addressed. Addressing these issues will not only help our regulatory divisions when subsequent permits are reviewed but will provide greater assurances to this department that the impacts resulting from the proposed action would be avoided or minimized. The Department of Transportation is encouraged to work with our commenting divisions prior to submitting the FONSI for state review. Thank you for the opportunity to respond. Attachments CEIV' -0 REF oc? 3 0 ?95? STATE CLEARI?!??',OUSF. N.C. PO Box 27687, Raleigh, Norlh Carolina 27611-7687 • Telephone. 919-715-4148 An Equal Opportunity / AYirmatrie Action Employer 50% Recycled 10% Post-Consumer Paper A-7 }ate of Nortn l_arollna Cjepar'l:ment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director October 23, 1997 TO: Melba McGee Office of Legisla FROM: Michael A. Kell Deputy Director SUBJECT: Project Number: Haywood county & \Intergove 8-Ff025O ID FE 1--? N FR., ECF C - 3 Igg7 Program De,e!c,Pme;;i ental Affairs - The Waste Management?D,i_vis-ion has reviewed and commented on the above-referenced project. Please find enclosed separate comments from the Hazardous Waste Section, Solid Waste Section and Superfund Section. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to contact our office. MK:sh Enclosures P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-9603 Telephone 919-733-4996 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled 110% Post-Consumer Pacer A-8 State of North Carolina D.-partment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director MEMORANDUM October 17, 1997 I + TO: Mike Kelly, Deputy Director Division of Solid Waste Management - THROUGH: Bruce Nicholson, Head, Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section FROM: S. Franch, Environmental Chemist, Z Superfund Section ?- SUBJECT: Haywood County- Improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from Waynesville City Limits to Jerry Liner Road. I have completed the review of the attached information on the subject project for the proximity to CERCLIS or inactive hazardous waste sites. The subject project involves the widening of US 23 Business to a five-lane road from the Waynesville City limits northward to 0.25 mile north of Industrial Park Drive. The remaining section of road would be slightly realigned and have resurfacing improvements. The entire length of affected road is 2.2 miles long, originating from the city limits northward to Jerry Liner Road. Six sites were found within a four-mile radius of this project's corridor. These sites are described below and are denoted on the attached map. The Schulhoffer Junkyard(NCD 024 852 675) is 0.5 miles west of the road project. The Haywood County Landfill (NCD 981 474 190) is 0.3 miles east of the project. Both the Dayco Corp. site (NCD 003 148 798) and the Dayco Landfill Crymes Cove Road (NCD 982 119 463) site are about 3.0 and 2.0 miles, respectively, south of the project. All these four aforementioned sites have been removed from CERCLIS by the Brownfields Initiative. They are still on the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch list. Both the Benfield Industries NPL Site (NCD 981 026 479) and the A. C. Lawrence Leather Company Site (NCO 000 195 701) are 2.5 miles southwest of the project. The latter has been given a No Further Action status from the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch. After reviewing the file information, I believe it is unlikely that the project will affect the sites or vice versa. If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 314 cc: Bruce Nicholson P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-9603 Telephone 919-733-4996 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled 1 109'. Post-Consumer Paper A-9 r' \, ?CIII t?D CA\{ LLrt b\. v1S ?-= ? ? .,'?? ? ?:- - °' ,, , ?? 1,... 1 ?y a 6 S fit:,, r,r '„• _ "",'nl Qil?t Gy .. _.%hurCn.i fe, Fairw 1132 r-+?? ?a • i. -?' Hill s\ ?¢' Suss ¦uo .e 0 Fri T1?b111A P?i\ Ilr?/P. 8NL3B C? 0 % SCHULHOFFER „': JUNKYARD p /; Hiilcreal'IMemo,i¦I ej•• la 9 NCD 024 852 675, - y?' ,??.: .•? >.;:•. ?tia l 1 ?? c , __ _ ??:( /- / ?'••. •t qc'\??, , ' ??• 1 -_7. N•1. of dio ovY_ 1/ ?,?=? - _. ??.'•' I I l/ ,' HAYWOOD CO LDFL!% N- NCD 981 474 190 %(`,.?' %-'?_ 1' I `? , / \ "• ` Sl ' y ,? '"\. _\ \ta,;;;' .? {/ i "??1 / %? o „?• t :-1• ? =i -??-?,r ,/.r?,-'• '>tYneivillF ?? ,['" __ ( l- l•/- ? •1 -' `••: I ?? ?, , / - .0 111 \ %i?:??; ... ! ?. -?/, \ Shl y ?. v `?xF°'h' 'a..•. Q.l •' ? ? J. ? `? . ? ,II • Dr.rr ?n '(, r c o ,f ^ - hlJle W ?7 I ... ':. / /I,oc,i. ,.? 26?w ? ?;t ?, •m r .r/?I?:, it ink it • ?, \.' ?/' ',// 1 •? 1\ - ??:jW? \•(\* ~ l \ ?u_? V? %,%'/`,.\ / 1 t• _, .? 4.i„'' ? ,\?`M II? vii'-' ' _1, ? ? II%^`1\??\? SCALE 1:24 000 1 MILE v -15 I o NV. • / L '1' • ??•I ' 2 6000 7000 2000 FEET `' ,.i / ?'s• ` r'-- 0 1000 I0? 2000 4000 •+ / •'//; 1 Lia. /?.I 1 - I KILOMETER 0 `AC Lawrence Leather Co. CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET ; NCO 000 195 701 :?,•;• NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1925 ) I /•?1 II'I ?.: ••/ I1r?J,• •L, •I. ??. :i .. ?J ? ., ;: tij••? /? / V ,1 /^ .?? { ??J/jl l?lJ=jj1 DDAYCO LANDFILL \ 1 1 r r::F' ??? CRYMES COVE ROAD / • 1' .i'pI,\ (. BENFIELD ri'I ?: uvo'p• fl/?I? ??.a_ :2; :? NCD 982 119 463 INDUSTRIES, INC /:NCD 981 026 479,; : ;*'_y .y" ..; f ?' ?Id ?I? (•:! 1 I- ?-? JS\ , , L'•r-- rl•? .' u - `- \;?,,I ?. 1 AW,r'=r '. ?•C• /a/nes• I ^ ,I ?J.1 \ ? ,1 I: rv 11',: ??-? / /' •-.- •?y"" .'?i.?? `•) ?? •.. I II { •-? . u V call A nfl `>1 ..l ? ? , - 1 I -' • J ` -- f ? f'J C! / y ?i It11 : K co.,, ry ?? \ `l O :.C`9, ` ? ,•? ?U' `??r/ '_"?\ l.. _?`l? ?-•?..:?C- f " I . _ , ?( ?? DAYCO CORP` a Y4T•? NCD 003 148 792 :.moo? ,?///?/ .%? '•/'? - ,....: _ .i't? iP, 1 ?? ?; I .I 'mil = ':ti ?' c,,:. 1' . .-, ? \'-J ?? I • ?'? `?' "?.??'. \i-• -_'. - - . . A-10 ,2t3te of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources .s Division of Waste Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary William L. Meyer, Director FZ October 14, 1997 r ? ! i / (Q0 E -_ i TO: Michael A. Kelly - Deputy Director ?rCJ•- r,.,? ._. Waste Management Division 561- FROM: Spring Allen - Waste Management Specialist Hazardous Waste Section/Compliance Branch SUBJECT: Reference Project #98-E-2050 - Haywood County The Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation propose to widen and improve US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). This project is approximately 2.2 miles long. The Hazardous Waste Section has reviewed the noted project and offers the following comments: There are no known hazardous waste generators on the proposed route, however there is a stream and several gasoline stations, one which was closed a few years ago, and an LP gas provider. One incident occurred several years ago at the Haywood County Health Department. It consisted of emergency response in the removal of potentially explosive ether, but was without incident at the time. Otherwise the area is an established residential area. I understand that there is strong local opposition to the project. If any problems or questions should arise, do not hesitate to contact me at (704)251-6208. A-11 Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director 4 • • fDEHNfR. October 9, 1997 10EMORANDUM To: Michelle Suverkrubbe kAJ Through: John From: Cyndi Dorne Bell GL? 3 IG?? Program Deve!opr1e,-1 Franc" Subject: US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road) near Waynesville Haywood County State Project DOT No. 8.1942901, T.I.P. No. R-2210A; EHNR n 98-0250 The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands. The proposed work would involve no fill in wetlands. Potential impacts to two perennial streams were not quantified. DWQ offers the following comments 'based on the document review: A) This project will involve culvert extension and/or channel changes at two locations. The potential linear distances of these stream impacts were not included in the EA. If the culverts and/or channel changes exceed 150 feet linear distance of stream at either crossing, stream mitigation will be required in accordance with current DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)1. If necessary, said stream mitigation proposal should be included with the permit application. The Wetland Restoration Program will be available to use for stream mitigation for this project. B) DWQ asks NCDOT to stipulate that borrow material will be taken from upland sources in the construction contract awarded for this project. Based upon the wetland and stream impacts described in the EA, General Certification 3103 will be applicable to this project. Please be aware that this is contingent upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary. Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Telephone 919-733-9960 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5015 regc4ed/10% post consumer paper A-12 Ms. Michelle Suverltrubbe Memo October 9, 1997 Page 2 of 2 DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bell at (919) 733-1786 in DWQ's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch. cc: Steve Lund, COE, Asheville David Cox, WRC Howard Hall, FWS R2110A.DOC A-13 ECF.IVE_1 1007 i_ -- - gram, Cs el: North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission g 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources FROM: Mark S. Davis, Mountain Region Coordinator V V//, Habitat Conservation Program DATE: October 15, 1997 SUBJECT: State Clearinghouse Project No. 98-E-0250, Environmental Assessment (EA) for transportation improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Road), from the Waynesville Town Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road), near Waynesville, Haywood County, Federal Aid Project No. STP- 23B(1), State Project No. 8.194290 1, TIP No. R-2210 A. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the subject (EA) and our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The proposed project consists of widening the existing two-lane shoulder facility to a five- lane, 20.4 meter (68-foot) curb and gutter roadway from Marshall Street/Woodland Drive to approximately 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR 1267 (Industrial Park Drive). No widening is proposed for the existing four-lane section of US 23 Business from 0.4 km (0.25 mile) north of SR. 1267 to SR 1801; however, minor curve realignment and resurfacing are proposed for this section of roadway, where warranted. This project is approximately 3.5 km (2.2 miles) long. The NCWRC supports the use of existing roadway corridors for transportation improvements over the development of new roadway corridors. Primary impacts to fish and wildlife resources involve the loss of stream and upland habitat, sedimentation of aquatic habitat from construction activities, and the loss of additional habitat associated with secondary development along the highway corridor. A-14 98-E-02 5,0 Pa?ze 2 October 15, 1997 The EA pro\ides extensive information on biotic communities and impacted aquatic habitats. Direct project impacts associated with project construction are adequately described to allow our review of the proposed alternatives; however, the EA is unclear on the total footage of stream impacts associated NNith the project. On page i! Section 7, Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts, paragraph 2, the EA indicates that 40 m (135 feet) of stream modifications will be made to Raccoon Creek. On page 40, paragraph 5, the EA indicates 40 m (135 feet) of stream impacts due to culvert placement and 100m (330 feet) of stream channelization and/or relocation. Also on page 41, and additional 10 m (33 feet) of unnamed tributary to Raccoon Creek will be impacted as a result of pipe extension. This additional 363 linear feet of stream channel impacts should be included in the Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts (Section 7) on page iii. The NCWRC cannot concur with a FONSI until the total linear feet of impacted stream channel is confirmed. If channel relocation is involved, we as that the new channel be constructed in a dry work area and stabilized before water is diverted. We ask that the new channel be designed to resemble the old channel in width, depth, and ?adient and that natural substrate, not rip-rap, be used in the channel floor. Native trees and shrubs should be planted along the stream bank to provide cover for fish and wildlife, provide shade to reduce water temperatures, and protect the stream bank from erosion. It is correctly noted in the EA that Haywood County is recognized as a "trout water county" by the Corps of Engineers (COE) and a 404 permit will be required for this project. The NCWRC will review any Nationwide or General permit associated with this project and recommends that impacts to streams or wetlands be avoided wherever possible. In the case of unavoidable losses, we will recommend mitigation as a condition of the 404 permit. Subsequent project documentation should provide a conceptual plan for such mitigation, detailing efforts to restore or enhance the riparian areas associated with Raccoon Creek and its tributaries. In addition; the NCWRC has the following recommendations and they should be included in the 404 permit application: 1. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures must be implemented and maintained on the project site to avoid impacts to downstream aquatic resources. Structures should be inspected and maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events. 2. The reinforced concrete box culvert should be constructed so that all water flows through one cell during low flows to maintain fish passage. Cells should be buried approximately one foot below the level of the stream bottom to allow natural stream bottom materials to become established in the culvert following installation. Water should be diverted through a single cell by installing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cell(s) to block low flows. 3. Adequate precautions should be taken to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Uncured concrete affects water quality and is tonic to fisli and other organisms. A-15 95-E-0250 PaLTe 3 October 15, 1997 4. Storm-water should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams. 5. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 davs of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stases for this project. If I can fiuther assist your office, please contact me at (704) 452-2546. A-16 AYl4E5V1L • J; ... OFFICE OF MAYOR Tour of Wayfie sville October 21, 1997 Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Division of Highways P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611 Dear Mr. Vick: Earlier this month, a series of meetings were held in our community with the focus on how to make it more desirable to walk, ride bicycles, and slow the speeds of traffic on roadways in our area. Dan Burden, a traffic specialist, conducted these meetings and placed great emphasis on how the citizens of a community can become involved in the planning process of highway construction. By doing so, it is possible to prevent a highway from being overbuilt or being so wide with asphalt that motorists tend to travel much faster than is desirable. On October 9th a group of approximately 75 citizens met at Town Hall to discuss the Asheville Road Project. They were in unanimous agreement that additional studies should be conducted prior to preparing the final plans for this project. The group would like to propose that an intense planning effort be made possible by the D.O.T. to reconsider the design of this road, and at the same time allow the citizens of our area to be involved in the planning process by employing a technique for public involvement called a "Chairette". This charrette would be financed by the D.O.T. at a quoted price of about $30,000.00. This cost could save the D.O.T. several times the amount spent. After we enter this planning process, there will be plenty of time to.carefully consider what type of road width is needed in view of the current and projected daily traffic counts and the present and potential uses along that road. A-17 POB C-100. 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786.0100 • PHONE (704) 4567515 Mr. H. Franklin Fick P.E. 10-21-97 Pau, e This would provide a very attractive artery into Waynesville, and would also provide for future similar improvement to the intersecting Howell Mill Road which will cross Russ Avenue, connect to the Old Dellwood Road and the Boyd Avenue bridge (running behind Giles Chemical) which project is already on the T.I.P. This would also provide another much needed artery into Central Waynesville as well as to the Hazelwood area. We have a lot of roadwork that is needed in Waynesville. Waynesville is growing and we want to provide quality growth. Infrastructure MUST KEEP UP WITH GROWTH and we are committed to making Waynesville and its surrounding area attractive and an area our people can enjoy to the utmost. Sincerely, Henry . Foy Mayor HBF:pm A-18 POB C-100 106 SOUTH MAIN ST.. WAYNESVILLE. NC 28786-0100 • PHONE (704) 456.3515 NOTICE OF A FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING OF US 23 BUSINESS (ASHEVILLE ROAD) FROM THE WAYNESVILLE CITY LIMITS (MARSHALL STREET/WOODLAND DRIVE) TO SR 1801 (JERRY LINER ROAD) Project 8.1942901 R-221 OA Haywood County The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the above formal public hearing on October 21, 1997 at 7 PM in the Tuscola High School Auditorium located at 350 Tuscola School Road in Waynesville. The hearing will consist of an explanation of the proposed location and design of proposed project. In addition, right of way and relocation requirements and procedures will be explained. The hearing will be open for statements, questigns, comments, and submittal of material pertaining to the proposed project. Additional.materials may be submitted for a period of 15 days from the date of the hearing to: L. T. Dudley, P.E. at P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611. Under this project, it is proposed to widen and improve US 23 Business from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to Jerry Liner Road. The existing two-lane shoulder facility is proposed to be widened to a five-lane, 68-ft. wide curb and gutter roadway. The proposed improvements include realigning several curves throughout the project. Generally, the proposed right of way width for this project will be 100 feet; however, areas with more severe terrain may necessitate additional right of way. The construction of this proposed project will require the relocation of several homes and businesses. A copy of the Environmental Assessment document and a map showing the design for this project are available for public review at NCDOT Haywood County Maintenance Facility located at 619 Paragon Parkway in Clyde. Anyone desiring additional information may contact Mr. Dudley at P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611, phone (919) 250-4092, or fax (919) 250-4208. In order to comply with the American Disabilities Act, NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to attend the hearing. To receive special services, please contact Mr. Dudley one week prior to the date of the hearing so that arrangements can be made. A-19 WIDENING OF US 23 BUSINESS FROM MARSHALL STREET - WOODLAND DRIVE TO JERRY LINER ROAD IN WAYNESVILLE PROJECT 8.1942901 TIP NO. R-2210A HAYWOOD COUNTY FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING TUSCOLA HIGH SCHOOL OCTOBER 21, 1997 A-20 P17RPOSE OF THE PROJECT The purpose of the proposed project is to alleviate present and future anticipated traffic congestion along existing US 23 Business. It is anticipated this project will increase traffic mobility and enhance safety. The proposed improvements are warranted to accommodate projected traffic growth and to insure motorists' safety. As a result of the proposed improvements, the benefits to the community, state, and region will be more efficient and safe- vehicle operation, and reduced travel time. Indirect socio-economic benefits will be derived from the general improvement of highway transportation. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING Tonight's hearing is one step in the Department of Transportation's procedure for including the public as a part of the project planning process. The Department of Transportation is soliciting your views on the proposed widening and improvements to US 23 Business (Asheville Road) from the Waynesville City Limits (Marshall Street/Woodland Drive) to SR 1301 (Jerry Liner Road). The Department of Transportation's views of the above project are set forth in the Environmental Assessment document. Copies of this report are available tonight for your review. Both the report and a copy of the Public Hearing Map have been available to the public at the NCDOT Haywood County Maintenance Facility. YOUR PARTICIPATION Now that the opportunity is here you are urged to participate by making your comments and/or questions part of the Official Public Hearing Transcript. This may be done by having them recorded here tonight, writing them on the comment sheet and leaving it with a Department of Transportation representative here tonight, or by mailing them in during the next 15 days following the Public Hearing to: Mr. L. T. Dudley, PE Citizen's Participation Unit P. 0. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611 Everyone present is urged to participate in the proceedings. It is important, however, that THE OPINIONS OF ALL V DIVIDUALS BE RESPECT REGARDLESS OF HOW DIVERGENT THEY MAY BE FROM YOUR OWN. Accordingly, debates are out of place at public hearings. Also, the public hearing is not to be used a POPULAR REFERENDUM to determine the alignment and design by a majority vote of those present. WHAT IS DONE WITH THE INPUT? All spoken and written comments received through the public involvement process will be thoroughly reviewed and carefully considered before any final decisions are made. A-21 GFNFRAL DESCRIPTION The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, proposes to widen existing US 23 Business (Asheville Road) to a five-lane curb and gutter facility from the northeast ?Vaynesville City Limits (Marshall StreetAVoodland Drive) to SR 1801 (Jerry Liner Road). This project will utilize a combination of east side, west side, and symmetrical widening of US 23 Business in an effort to minimize overall impacts to the natural and human environment. The proposed alignment will flatten several existing curves throughout the length of the project and improvements will be made to the grade. The proposed improvements will increase the sight distance and, thus, reduce accident potential. PROJECT INFORNIATTON Typical Section: 5 lane curb and gutter with additional turn lanes at intersections Right of Way: Generally 100 feet; however, variable width depending on the terrain Estimated Cost: Right of Way Cost S 3,940,500 Construction Cost S 6,600,000 Total Cost S 10,540,500 Tentative Schedule: Right of Way - December 1998 Construction - June 2000 Relocatees: 5 Residences 7 Business TYPICAL SECTION 8 ft 2ft 14h i 12ft 12ft i 12ft i 14ft 12J 8 ft 6' 5ft lft GRADE `POI i T _ A-22 STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONSHIP This is a proposed Federal-.-did Highway Project and will be constructed under the Federal-.kid Highway Program. Funding for this project will be 800/10 from Federal funds and 20° o from State funds. The Board of Transportation is responsible for the selection, scheduling, location, design, and construction of the project. The Board is responsible for 100% of the maintenance of the roadway after it is built. The Federal Highway Administration is responsible for the re,,iew and approval of the previously-mentioned activities to ensure that the project is designed and constructed to Federal-Aid standards. RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES Upon completion of the final design, the proposed right of way limits will be staked on the ground. Affected property owners will be contacted by a Right of Way Agent who will explain the plans and the impacts to individual properties. Professionals who are familiar with real estate values will evaluate or appraise the property. The appraisals will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy and then a written offer will be made to the property owner by the Right of Way Agent. The current market value of the property at its highest and best use when it is appraised will be offered as compensation. The Department of Transportation must: 1) Treat all owners and tenants equally. 2) Fully explain the owner's rights. 3) Pay just compensation in exchange for property rights. 4) Furnish relocation advisory assistance. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE If you are a Relocatee, that is, if your residence or business is to be acquired as a part of the project, additional assistance in the form of advice and compensation is available. In addition to being contacted by a Right of Way Agent, you will also be contacted be a Relocation Agent. This Agent can provide you with assistance on locations of comparable housing and/or commercial establishments, moving procedures, and moving aid. Moving expenses may be paid for you. Additional monetary compensation is available to help homeowners cope with mortgage increases, increased value of comparable homes, closing costs, etc. A similar program is available to assist business owners. Your Relocation Agent can explain this assistance in greater detail. NOTE: PAMPHLETS SUMMARIZING RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES AND RELOCATEE ADVISORY ASSISTANCE ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. A-23 1. Vl?l .?1 Ll\ 1 011 L-U- 1 Proposed Widening of L'S 23 Business from the Wavnesville Cite Limits (Marshal Street;Woodland Drive) to SR ISO I (Jerry Liner Road) October 21, 1997 T.I.P. r R-2210A Haywood County Project S. 1942901 NAME: ADDRESS: CONLVIENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS: Comments may be mailed to: L. T. Dudley, PE N. C. Department of Transportation Citizens Participation Unit P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611 'telephone: (919) 2504092 Fax: (919) 2504203 A-24