19-08_4_Redacted

Introduction
Cherokee Sanford Brick (CSB) owns and operates a surface mine in Moncure, Chatham County,
North Carolina. The mine is identified as Brickhaven Mine No. 2 (Permit No. 19-08) with 382 acres
permitted at the site and 83.5 acres allowed to be disturbed. CSB maintains sediment and erosion
control sufficient to meet NCDENR requirements. However, traditional sediment basins may not
completely remove turbidity and suspended solids due to the highly colloidal content and poor settling
characteristics of the storm water which collects in mining area.
As a result of CSB's regard for the environment and community concern a meeting was held with
Members of the Moncure Community, Members of the Chatham County Commissioners and
Members of the Chatham County Planning Board to discuss Goff Creek water quality issues in
November 1997. In addition to that meeting, CSB scheduled a meeting with NCDENR to discuss
researching to determine the feasibility and practicality of additional water treatment, specifically
turbidity and suspended solids treatment. Since CSB maintains sufficient sediment and erosion
control to meet'NCDENR requirements, additional water treatment exceeds all requirements and
permit conditions.
Project Description
Currently, the mine excavation consists of approximately 50 acres which collects storm water at the
lowest portion of the mine. The water is pumped up gradient to a sediment basin which drains by
gravity through a brick filter and eventually offsite.
Pursuant to the meeting with NCDENR Division of Water Quality and Division of Land Resources,
CSB began evaluating alternatives for the additional water treatment including various polymers. Jar
tests were conducted to determine the effectiveness of individual polymers. Application of the
polymer presented the greatest challenge at the remote mining location.
Initially, CSB selected a gel log polymer. Water was pumped from the mining area to a series of five
100 gallon farm tanks to provide mixing. Each tank contained two gel logs. Water flowed from the
farm tanks into the sediment basin (See Pictures). Reduction in turbidity was observed, however, the
gel logs accumulated sediment which seemed to affect water treatment and have little impact on
suspended solids. As a result, CSB continued to evaluate other alternatives.
Additional jar tests were conducted with a liquid polymer (See Attachment A) which is utilized in
wastewater and drinking water applications. The jar tests determined the proper application rate and
based on pump flow rates an electrical chemical feed pump was set up to introduce the desired
amount of polymer for optimum treatment. The same setup for the gel log application was utilized
to provide adequate mixing and the polymer was introduced in the uppermost tank. Water flowed
into the basin from the farm tanks where flocculation began and colloidal clay particles settled rapidly
to produce reduced effluent turbidity and suspended solids. Sediment accumulation in the tanks was
minimal.

Results
The gel log polymer was successful in reducing turbidity (See Attachment B) although the collection
of sediment on the logs and in the tanks make the logs an undesirable alternative for CSB. The liquid
polymer is the alternative which worked best for CSB and significantly decreased turbidity and
suspended solids (See Attachment Q. Approximately 90,000 gallons per day can be treated with
1.75 gallons or 15 pounds of polymer at a cost of approximately $15 -$20 per day.
Conclusion
Both alternatives made an impact on water quality, however, the liquid polymer significantly reduced
suspended solids and turbidity and worked best for. CSB. As a result, CSB intends to continue the
use of the polymer when necessary to treat storm water which collects in the mining area. In
addition, the material which collects in the sediment basin will be utilized in brick manufacturing when
excavated from the basin. CSB continues to have respect for the environment and community
concern as demonstrated by the effectively improving water quality utilizing new and creative
practices.

phU_FdFL0,_C
Technical Bulletin 10102 -
How to Use the PHOTAFLOCTm Gel Cube Sample Kit
for Log-in-the-StreamTM Product Selection
Neutron Products family of PHOTAFLOCT" gel
comprises a complete catalogue of more than
twenty water treatment polymers. The Log-in-
the-StreamT" sample kit contains several gel
cube types selected for their potential effecti= e
ness in your application. The evaluation proce-
dure is simple and no expensive equipment is
required.
We recommend that testing be conducted on -
site, as effluent samples may change over time
or during transport affecting the validity of the
results. Use effluent samples which are repre-
sentative of normal operating conditions. If the
effluent is subject to periodic variation, testing
should be repeated to account for changing
conditions.
Required equipment includes a large container
for collecting effluent, several clear wide mouth
jars or equivalent, and a timer (a watch with a
second hand is okay).
Fill several jars to the same level; about
half full. Add a gel cube to one jar and
cap. Wait two minutes for the cube to
become wet and swell.
► Shake by holding the jar by the lid and
inverting. Count the number of shakes.
Stop after five shakes and note the Floc
size, settling rate, and clarity of the water.
Continue in this manner until clear water
is observed.
► Repeat with cubes of each type of poly-
mer, striving for consistent treatment of all
samples. The best polymers will .be the
ones that produce large, fast settling flocs
and clear water with the fewest number of
shakes.
► . When the selection has been narrowed to
two or three products, retest using the wet
cubes from earlier tests, eliminating the
two minute wetting period, and shaking
two jars side -by -side.
► Decant the treated water into clean jars,
leaving the gel cubes behind. Cap the
jar, shake vigorously for ten to fifteen sec-
onds and observe. Some reduction in
floc size is normal, but the successful
product should still produce acceptable
water quality on standing for a few min-
utes.
Difficult to treat effluents may require longer
shaking in order to dissolve sufficient polymer for
adequate flocculation. Water temperature and
quality may affect dissolution rates, and some
fragile flocs may not withstand intense or pro-
longed shaking. Thus some experimentation
may be required to optimize the test procedure
for individual needs.
Best results are sometimes obtained by
segential treatment with two different gel prod-
ucts. This approach will often improve clarity or
strengthen small or fragile flocs. To evaluate
product combinations follow the procedure, then
decant, add the second gel cube and continue.
Help and advice is always available from the
Neutron Products' Technical Assistance Group
or from your PHOTAFLOCT" sales representative.
neUTRon PRODUCTS inc
22301 Mt. Ephraim Road - :' 0.- Box 68 - Dickmori. ,tfarvland 20842 USA
.301-349-5001 - FAX: [phone]

CAT -FLOC DL
Cationic Liquid Polymer
Product Description: CAT -FLOC DL is a medium molecular weight, liquid cationic polyelectrolyle. It is
used as a primary coagulant or coagulant aid in water and wastewater clarification. It is highly effective
as a replacement for, or can be used in conjunction with, inorganic coagulants such as ferric salts or
alum. CAT -FLOC DL is chlorine resistant and effective over a broad pH range. CAT -FLOC DL is
available in plastic pails, steel or plastic drums, recyclable bins, and bulk.
Features:
Benefits:
• Liquid polymer
Easy to feed
• NSF tnternabonarcertified
Acceptable for use in drinking water
applications
• Unique high charge, medium molecular
Effective in a wide range of wastewater and
weight cationic polymer
water clarification applications
• Forms a strong floc
Improved finished water quality
• May reduce or replace inorganic coagulants
Reduce sludge generation
Environmental and Toxicity Date: See product MSDS for complete toxicological and environmental
information.
Regulatory Status: CAT -FLOC DL conforms to the requirements ANSIDLis
�.
Standard 60 -Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals -Health Effects. CAT-- DL FLOC is
certified by NSF tntemadonalas a coagulation and flocculation drinking water treatment
chemical to a maximum feed rate of 57 mgll.
FDA Approved Sections: 176.180 components of paper and paperboard in contact with dry food.
176.170 components of paper and paperboard in contact with
aqueous and fatty foods. Typical Properties l® 25"cl
D.O.T. Class ............................... Not Restricted
D.O.T. Proper Shipping Name ...................... Not Applicable
Handling and Storage: Improper handling of this product
can be injurious to workers. Observe all safety precaudons
shown on the label and in the Malarial Safety Data Sheet
Keep from freering. Store CAT -FLOC DL polymer in heated
buildings or heat -traced tanks to prevent freezing. Although
this product is freeze -thaw stable, stratification may occur
upon freezing. CAT -FLOC OL polymer will become uniform
again upon agitation.
Form
liquid
Appearance
Viscol clear. pale
yollow to amber
specific Gravity
IN
PH
5-s
Viscosity of Product, We
d001.10
Freeze Point (F)
32
Flash Point (F)
>200
Butelin No. 6E24; Rev. 5/96

Feeding: CAT -FLOC DL polymer may be fed neat as long as in -
line dilution is provided. However, dilution to 1 % as product is
recommended to assure better contact of the coagulant with the
impurities in the water. A Calgon SO, P-18 or MDS feed system
is recommended. Neat polymer feed systems should be capable
of handling 1000 cps viscosity material. A variety of chemical
feed systems are available from Calgon to satisfy your specific
application needs. Please contact your local Calgon
representative or our Chemical Equipment Group for feed
system recommendations.
Dosage Requirements: Product feed rate will be site and
application specific, and may vary as conditions change. Product
demand may be determined by a screening test using Jar Test
procedures.
Materials of Compatibility: CAT -FLOC DL polymer is
moderately corrosive to iron and copper, including their alloys.
Storage tanks, chemical feed systems, and piping should be
constructed of high density (HOPE) or crosslinked (XLPE)
polyethylene, fiberglass (FRP) with polyester or vinylester resins,
epoxy -or vinylester-lined steel.
Disposal: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal
regulations. Discarded product, as sold, is not considered a
RCRA hazardous waste.
Materials of Compatibility
Material
Satis.
Un-
satis.
Carbon Steel
X
304 Stainless Steel
X
316 Stainless Steel
X
Polyethylene - crosslinked
X
Polyethylene - low den
X
Polyethylene - high den
X
Pofypropyiene
X
PVC
X
CPVC -
X
Kynar
X
Viton
X
Neoprene
X
Buna-N Rubber
X
Silicone 65
X
FRP (bisphenol)
X
FRP (isophthalic)
X
Plascite 7122 (epoxy)
Plawite 4100 (vinyl ester)
L
X
The information and recommendations contained in this document are presented in good faith and believed to be reliable, but shall
not be part of the terms and conditions of sale of any Calgon product. Because many factors affect product application and
performance, each Calgon customer must determine for itself, by conducting appropriate tests or other methods, whether a Cafgon
product is suitable for that customer's needs. CALGON MAKES NO WRITTEN, ORAL, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY
REGARDING THE CALGON PRODUCTS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THEIR USE, OR THE
ACCURACY OR USE OF THE INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. CALGON SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Information conceming human and environmental exposure may be reviewed on the Material Safety Data Sheet for the product. For
additional information regarding incidents involving human and environmental exposure call 1-800-955-0090 and ask for the Health
and Environmental Affairs Department.
All names in boldface are trademarks or service marks of Calgon Corporation
For more information, contact your local Calgon representative, call 1-800-955-0090,
or write: Calgon Corporation, P.O. Box 1346, Pittsburgh, PA 15230.
Internet address: http://www.calgon.com
gp—
R P ❑ R A T I O N
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, CREATIVE SOLUTIONS ... SINCE 1918
Bulletin No. 6E24; Rev. 5/98

Sediment Basin Sample Results
Calgon CAT -FLOC DL
Sample ID
TSS m IL
Turbidity NTU
050499-INF
1675
2530
051199-INF
No Flow
No Flow
051999-INF
138
2950
070899-INF
160
2490
072199-INF
378
2650
050499-EFF
215
1290
051199-EFF
34
493
051999-EFF
38
340
070899-EFF
14
114
072199-EFF
26
100

SedimentBasin
■■■ .,
■■ .
- � -- -
■■■ ;
� «
■■ . -
� 2
■■■
� _
m -
■■ : -
� . .
■ ' - »
.. . Sample ■
TSS , _Turbidity

Sediment Basin Effluent
Calgon CAT -FLOC DL
1400-
1200 --- ---- - - -
1000 -
800 - --- --- -- - - - - --
600 - - -- -
400 _ --- --------- -
200 --- - ----
O 050499-EFF. 051199-EFF 051999-EFF 070899-EFF 072199-EFF
Sample ID
❑ TSS (mg/L) M Turbidity (NTU)

Sediment Basin Total Suspended Solids
Calgon CAT -FLOC DL
2000
J 1500
A
Sample ID
11 Influent Effluent

Sediment Basin Turbidity
Calgon CAT -FLOC DL
3000
2500
� 2000-
z
1500 -
a 1000 -
500-
0 050499 050499 051199 051199 051999
Sample ID
I Influent ---- Effluent
_a

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
I. MINE NAME -Wa 2. MINING PERMIT #
3. OPERATOR r v...� 0 SL.L k �. cL. 4. COUNTY G4n4ta FN
5. ADDRESS/U0 Gnlr,1 R// ;a.,/wa AIC. �L73-70
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE I'ID4APa f. xor14-7. RIVER BASIN C-nv reJ1Z
8. Person(s) contacted at site Ir./.9 R V n 0.4 r L' 1
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes ®• No
11. Date last inspected: 06 ! /Y / 0;L. 12. Any mining since last inspection? i$ Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? IWYes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
v// V
t
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
/ n
! / / 4�
U
t
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
17. Other recommendations and comments: 118 d k,,;1 F Y ✓✓U i 0 e a +/se
/aJ rw.'r2 e. m./e% ..1.7 /'.z 2"'AWA/ ,O/?I .
f
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) 5Kof Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ®' No Proposed date
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report. Copy of Report sent to operator / /
/ (date)
INSPECTED BY: 1/nl /�,. nl./in/ort2 DATE 40
Telephone No: (iL,) 1 4'7t - c/ 740 /
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197

ra..a•:y„�y-.��...... y�,.,........„,�*+J++���: M..-o.,,iygrUil6"v,a•.a+.^w'Sm^..*s-r'^v—..r.......r,..o..,....�. P��w. , :. .... _,.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Sectiorl RECENiD
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
11 (PERMITTED MINE) JUL 21 2 4
1. MINE NAME IV`f Ci1t il+Z 2. MINING PE I -
3. OPERATOR(' FP ,.`7 _J -' y a%LC.4. COUNT '
5. ADDRESS 1H30CP)UT1 R 5 n1K�rr t l t � 7�30A1AU: WJrr�n 50.h:
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 10%5-05 7. RIVER 13ASIN r-
8. Person(s) contacted at site Wor rF1l
9. Was mine operating at time of inection? 0 Yes ❑ No t 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes Q No
11. Date last inspected: � ! Ira / spZ 12. Any mining since last inspection? II Yes ❑ No
13, Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? 'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? O Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
iA
IN
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
.�i-FP, i:5 ii� lt,LlY'��117iY1P,nip r�n� F-'mh Inrt`rt�.
17. Other recommendations and comments:
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate?Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes( No Proposed date
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection
`I/,Repo rt. 21., Copy of Report sent to operator/-(� 40/
/( INSPECTED BY: � V1�/IS�.� DATE I00;I bLt
Telephone No: 819I S71-u-100
While copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
�I

�9 -o�)
GENERAL SHALE GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS LLC
P.O. Box 3547, Johnson City, TN 37602 Ph. [phone] / FAX [phone]
BRIC®®�
Building the American Drew° www.generalshal8.com
iow.
Kenneth A. Parham March 29, 2004
Vice President OR i -ni
Human Resources & Environment
James D. Simons, Director
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Simons:
RE: Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
Responsible Official
In accordance with your request, please note that Mr. Warren Paschal, Manager of Environmental
Compliance, shall be granted signatory authority as a "Responsible Official" for environmental
matters of the company. As a Responsible Official, the Manager of Environmental Compliance
may sign official documents concerning environmental matters of the company.
Mr. Paschal is hereby granted authority to serve. as my duly authorized representative, and
therefore to serve as the Responsible Official for all General Shale North Carolina facilities
subject to permitting requirements.
Sincerely,
enneth A. arham
on
G16

a 3
Z
N
.. o Dt 3: La O y
rn > u w t (� o
0 o p v N
u
J
V J
Q d O
+ C O C m
N Q" lJ O r m
L L•
Q �_ N Z l_J 0 N
O O O -0U
w� + ZZu O O Z
m Z> C C E O
Zaoa Q1 E o
O _ m > ra al to O w
r c o ro o c
] o v Lcli� ra
Z U c z N u C CLJ U In
LLJ
oorq L -i w m L
u' < o$ Zm am al
b
00 LLJ
0 LLJ
0-
Z
3
0O w
v
a
I— o 0
o v�
W p
72
0
z
zz o w
�o — >
Q� u
w c/) v)
Q
a �
�n o
oLD
a
a —
c �\
O
� o
� o
z
o
u w> III
z CD s C) C)
o
C)U < ~ c n
CD w C/
ryLnF-- -J z
o
LJ o
�o
� W
o �
UD
z
X
w
YWn YY
aCrV
D
O88
m m
¢U_O Ja Q3�
z
00
CD u
Qw�
u �
0— C)u
CL
O4—
�z I-� I
0
QONuUZQZZ aNwvscawaomT}oLvua-avyui`naac=D-Noa i sL>maaw-.Co.aywVocccmccu,=caac
lCQ3JGQLLvasa..3/ucwsSI.1L�OaaNLa
cli
0
cn
ru
r NaVma'mO
O E°
'
�
.'t.m�Ym�Q°nwnfamarna01
—
—
IIIIIIIII II IIIII I II I III
!—_I-
-
aj
_IIIII 0N
L c
IIIII
L
Q Um uLL
Lm
m�aE
N aai}cviE
u o cO ai0 �
ci
ai -n
C ro ai m ro oE
"ru 3 �
0 o
O Ln o
cu
ro
aJ
ci
m�suQ=ZaQ-
EaNrJ> N C)a1
[.N;vO�oXD--
t�L�OOnL_ �LNµnD- t�
Ln
<�LNwOnO t�L
NuOLnOL--
�LOOdOn
N
aJ i—ro
ra
Eo o ai o
cu
C L- U
(Aw QJruo >
La-0 A.-
0 a u u
ai
ru Q/ L al
I L I CCaIn i-n ro `E i Ea-
u) a
O O ra o i au aiw v
(Li (Livv
o_O � ro --0 0 -D o "n
� oLn mc s �-
al ra
E E x x x
c 0 0 0lQc m
LF3 aJ Ln Oo O
y o E O-0 ra In ro C::) m0
x
4- X X X X X X
L d Ec 3 0 O <VWE E a s o !(/� O =
c E al N En O, O
Z w c E w a v v - cc c (n Ln co r` Ln 11 �o LnO
> Ea m m rn Ora
b_
N � OO C(Liu E 3 x O O
E mc }
E N O QJ
EE}c n m w, N
>sEa > (Li � c::,CDx E E m � co mE x xaa0
o o Ll
% c m c= -V O m O, (N O m 0
n E CO [- L-
co rr) Ln
ECrE E E
sT o
E yL
o > ma w c CD �
o o a
�` a a'E vO
s E E NE m u a? n`o cE c c x
° a °oro
m n a u L a 7-
Z o f > O m Vm cv .O w o Ec a c a > > 3CL
D > m m a W m m m
A x N X m co Li W
co3 iN x o m XZ -
p a }E
m m Om > O .E > 0 a m m m
E Qoa
O mm
y C a a ao op o ELo N
o 3 H . a E E o a >
aEc ce8 E E E rn o n oE o o QN m n w m > o
dd m 7 >o mQ CLT N QN
IS 8
.288
4C)
Q N m N m 16
mW 8 lo
57<

A
T WA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
April 6, 2005
Mr. Warren Paschal
General Shale Brick, Inc.
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
RE: Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Paschal:
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your recent request to have the above referenced mining permit modified has
been approved. The modification is to change the corporate name from Cherokee
Sanford Group LLC to General Shale Brick, Inc. I have enclosed a revised permit cover
page.
Please attach this approval letter and permit cover page to your existing mining
permit for future reference. The expiration date, mine name and permit number on the
permit document shall remain the same as before this modification.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede
local zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning
regulations lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 382 acres and the amount of
land you are approved to disturb is 337 acres.
In addition, please be aware that the expiration date for Mining Permit No. 19-08
is October 5, 2005. In order to continue mining operations at this site after October 5,
2005, a renewal request must be submitted prior to said date.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -919-733-4574 / FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Past Consumer Paper

Mr. Paschal
Page Two
Please advise this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
Si/lovy
ely,
R. Williams, PG, CPG, CPESC
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
FRW/jw
cc: Mr. John Holley, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton-WRC
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
For the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, " The Mining Act of 1971,"
Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
General Shale Brick, Inc.
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
County —Permit No. 19-08
for the operation of a
Clay Mine
Which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity, and scenic values of all lands and
waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest practical degree of
protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: October 5, 2005

• a
' MINING C HEC�KL,IST FOR ROUTING A
Applicant's Name: 1 ^1, �Gf' Pro Etcl_AIWvA, e?
Applic./Permit No.: IL County: l Aa,9&� Date Received: 3 Uhl
I �
Reviewer: nn���
✓ River Basin Name: �'�[
❑New ❑Renewal k Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Partial Release ❑Additional Information ❑Fee Needed:$
OFee Received: $ 50" 1 300o0
Masi; route entire application �lZ%(.�1. Regional 0 ceg((22complete copies; attach the"LQ5 Regional
Office MiningiApplication Review Checklist" to one copy and attach k1h the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Farm" to the other copy; send both cgpie to trhe+�R�egl' nahEngineer)
Date: Routed %i0.> Feei
❑ Division of Water Resources Date: Routed / / Reed
0 NG Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Recd _
❑ l)5 Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
PleaPlea5r route first 5 pages of the application and any lorator; maps tom:
❑ Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed Rec'd _
❑ NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed Reed _
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
0 Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec'd _
(Only new applications)
❑ Other:
Date: Routed Rec'd
"Eluspense Date for Comments: (no later than 25 days
from receipt)
,/!1 Please note the following:
�Y r

GENERAL Slily
GENERAL SHALE BRICK, INC.
BRICK��
1600 Colon Road, Sanford, Noah Carolina 27330
��at
(919) M-2121 NC 600-277-2700 Sales Fax [phone] Credll Fax [phone]
Building the American Dream,
w rgeneralshale.com
Via Certified Mail
70042890000366253397
February 18, 2005
Ms. Judy Wehner
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 2761 1-7686
17
M94 I FES 23 1005
R 1
gllgalysECT�
Re: Corporate Name Change
Mining Permit Nos. 19-04, 19-08, 19-14, 19-17, 53-05 and 53-06
Lee and Chatham Counties
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Ms. Wehner.
Please find enclosed the information necessary to complete the corporate name changes for the above
referenced mining permits. Please find two copies of the following:
L A check in the amount of $300 processing fee at $50 per site;
2. Page t-3 of the application for each of the above referenced mine sites;
3. A new land entry agreement for each of the above referenced mine sites.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] should you have any questions concerning the
information provided.
Sincerely,
t. P"4
Warren Paschal
Manager of Environmental Compliance

0 s
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF EN
AND NATURAL RFSOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION Sze bO �b
APPLICATION FOR A NUNING PERNH {y
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine Brickhaven Mine No. 2 County Chatham
River Basin Cape Fear Latitude(dd.mm.as) 35 D 36" 10" Longitude (dd.mm.ss) 79 D 010 02"
2. Name of Applicant* General Shale Brick, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 1600 Colon Road
Sanford. NC 27330
Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address 1600 Colon Road
Sanford, NC 27330 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Warren Paschal
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation. Q
***Signature l�t/��-ti— I44'+-" Date 2/3105
Print Name Warren Paschal
Title Manager of Environmental Compliance
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an apppplication for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a co� application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of
any supp ementa information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required

j

•
maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
® NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
1. a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by
the permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee -will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: Acres
leased: Property owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: Total
permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon):
c. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: Total permitted acreage:
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes_ No_. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No_. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application form
entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes_ No_ (if no, a "minor modification"
fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes, indicate the
acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to be added
to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreagge covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: 19-08
Total permitted acreage: 382
® SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Clams
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck X Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper X Other (explain)
-2-

0
Is
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 65
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation,
etc.) Ground Surface
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 45
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10
B. MAPS
Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on sgIN (6) copies of a 7.5 minute
quadrangle and a county highway map. These maps, in addition to six (6) copies of all mine maps and
reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
-- 7.5 minute quadrangles may be obtained from:
N.C. Geological Survey
NCDENR
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
— County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
-3-

0
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order
to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered
pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: General Shale Brick, Inc.
successor to Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
Signature:
Print Name:
Address: 1600 Colon _(load_
Sanford. NC 27330
Telephone: [phone]
APPLICANT: General Shale Brick, Inc.
Signature: * ��
Print Name: Warren Paschal
Title: Manager of Environmental Compliance
Company: General Shale Brick, Inc. _
Mine Name: Brickhaven Mine No. 2
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
ma s and the a ro riate essin fee (see next page far fee schedule) in the Form a check or money
order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to
the Land Qualm Section_ Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-21-

0 r

uuremw PERMITINAME CHANGE - 9300.00
7 1
DETACH THIS PORTION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS

• NORTH AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
November 4, 1999
Mr. Warren Paschal
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
RE: Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Chatham County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Paschal:
Your recent request to have the above referenced mining permit
modified has been approved. The modification is to increase the
affected acreage at the site to 337 acres as indicated on the mine
maps dated September 9, 1999. This modification also includes the
revised erosion and sediment control plan dated September 22, 1999
and allows the use of Calgon Catr-Floc DL for flocculation of fine
sediment particles in the basins onsite. A copy of the modified permit
is enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily upon
the initial application. Modifications were made as indicated by the
modification request and as required to insure compliance with The
Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date, mine name and permit
number shall remain the same as before the modification.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it
does not supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with any applicable zoning regulations lies with You.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site 1s 382 acres
and the amount of land you are approved to disturb is 337 acres.
J
6ACkfr. r " 10
VtiCWWA . `,1,.>L
LAND QUALITY SECTION (9191733.4574 FAX [phone]
QEOLOOICAL SURVEY SECTION [phone] FAX [919) 733-0900
P.O. 93x 27667. RALEICX, NO IRN CAROLINA 27611-7637 TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPIORI ITP / A,FIwMMlv6 ACTION EMPLOYER - 50NA RECYCLEW I O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Paschal
November 4, 1999
Page Two
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at [phone]
should you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
XLO
Tracy E. Davis, P.E.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEDIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Ms. Barbara Rote-WRC, wlenclosures
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ, wlenclosures

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining Act of
1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Chatham County - Permit No. 19-08
for the operation of a
Clay Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands
and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest practical
degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: October 5, 2005

0
0 Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the
Department,, and in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the
surrounding environment and for reclamation of the land and water affected by the
permitted mining operation. This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with
all the requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed
performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the
bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the
permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the
Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the
successor operator, provided that both operators have complied with the requirements of
the Mining Act and that the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the
permittee with reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor
is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit,
or is failing to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department
may give the operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the
permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The
operator shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed
modification, revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition
to the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by
law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S.
74-49.
Modifications
October 5, 1995: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage
from 17 acres to 83.5 acres, approve the pit expansion and the upgrading of the
associated sediment and erosion control measures as per the Mine Site Map dated
August 27, 1995, and allow modification to the spray irrigation system as approved by
the Division of Water Quality.
August 2, 1996: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. to Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC.
September 24, 1998: 'This permit has been modified to allow the temporary use (two
year approval) of a Photafloc polymer for enhanced sediment control for experimentation
purposes, with stipulations as outlined in the approval letter.

• • Page 3
November 4, 1999: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at
the site to 337 acres as indicated on the mine maps dated September 9, 1999. This
modification also includes the revised erosion and sediment control plan dated
September 22, 1999 and allows the use of Calgon Catr-Floc OIL for flocculation of fine
sediment particles in the basins onsite.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until October 5, 1995.
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et.
seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1.A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be In accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
I B.1 Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be In accordance
1\J/I with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact the
Stormwater Section, Division of Water Quality, to secure any necessary
stormwater permits or other approval documents.
C. Wastewater processing andmine dewatering shall be conducted in accordance
with Permit No. WQ 0007589 issued and enforced by the Division of Water
Quality.
2.A. Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shall be subject to the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air Quality.
B. During mining operations, water trucks or other means that may be necessary
shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted area.
3.A. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any adjoining
waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that waterway or wetland from
erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural
watercourse or wetland.
B. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
01A.
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland or
natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.

0 • Page 4
B. Drainage from the affected land shall be directed to sediment basins indicated in
the application for a mining permit and accompanying drawings dated January 29,
1985, August 14, 1985 and August 27, 1995. The sediment basins shall be
properly designed and constructed to meet or exceed the standard type 2
sediment basin design described in "Guide for Sediment Control on Construction
Sites in Construction", U.S. Department of Agriculture.
C. The sediment basins shall be initially constructed as indicated in the mining permit
application and accompanying drawings and enlarged as the affected areas are
expanded. The basins shall be dipped out when they become one-half full with
sediment.
D. As areas are cleared, diversion berms shall be constructed to divert water to
sediment basins as indicated on the Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995.
E. Whenever possible, drainage from the affected areas around the mine
excavation shall be diverted internal to said excavation.
F. Mining activities, including construction and maintenance of sediment and
erosion control measures, shall be conducted in phases as indicated on the
mine map and detail sheet (both dated September 9, 1999), the General
Project Discussion with Attachments dated September 22, 1999, and in
conformance with Operating Condition No. 4.C. above.
5, All mining permit boundaries (382 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site
on 100 foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals.
6. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which can
be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the
erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be planted
or otherwise provided with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such erosion.
7. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water
that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as
drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to
prevent such conditions.
8. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the
mine and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the operation from the
public.
9.A. Sufficient buffer (minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
excavation and any mining permit boundary or right-of-way to protect adjacent
property.
B. A minimum 40 foot undisturbed buffer (with adjacent excavation sideslopes
maintained at a minimum of three horizontal to one vertical) shall be maintained
around all powerline structures.
10. A physical barrier consisting of a fence or earthen berm, etc., shall be maintained
around the perimeter of any highwall.

0
•
Page 5
11 A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal shall
be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971 generated
on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be disposed of in a
designated refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of in a
disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers or any other material that may
be considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" fin addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1) on -site generated land clearing debris
2) conveyor belts
3) wire cables
4) v-belts
5) steel reinforced air hoses
6) drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit boundary,
the following information must be provided to and approved by the Division of
Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal:
1 . the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over
the refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be.
established.
E. Stockpiling of only petroleum contaminated soil shall be conducted in accordance
with Permit Nos. W00003219, W00007589 and SR0500046, issued by the
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and any revisions
approved or new permits issued by the Division of Water Quality.
12. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
13. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any
approved revisions to it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.

® Page 6
14. The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$500,000.00 blanket bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be
valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15.A. Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological
resources.
B. Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 70 Article 3, "The Unmarked Human Burial and Human
Skeletal Remains Protection Act," should the operator or any person in his employ
encounter human skeletal remains, immediate notification shall be provided to the
county medical examiner and the chief archaeologist, North Carolina Division of
Archives and History.

O • Page 7
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which Is a
condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation
Plan is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the
Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1 . The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance
with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed
- subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area
that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural
Experiment Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the. Reclamation Plan
herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time
schedule included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any event, provide
reclamation at the earliest practicable time after completion or termination of
mining on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1 . Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule, the planned
reclamation shall be to regrade and satisfactorily revegetate any disturbed areas
other than the mine excavations, which shall be restored to lake areas.
2.) The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the
planned future use are as follows:
A. All sideslopes shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope with
the exception of the lake areas.
B. Sideslopes of the lake areas shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
above the water level and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below the water
level. A minimum water depth of four feet measured from the low water table
elevation shall be maintained at all times.

• • Page 8
C. Any settling ponds or sediment basins shall be backfilled and stabilized.
✓ D. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
✓E. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
i/ F. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be In accordance with Operating Condition Nos. 11.A.
through E.
V G. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3.)
. Reveoetation Plan:
After site preparation, all disturbed land areas shall be revegetated as per the
Revegetation Plan approved by Mr. T. Patrick Shillington, P.E., on August 30,
1995.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible.
In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation,
including revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or
termination of mining.
This permit, issued to Cherokee Brick Company on August 30, 1985, transferred
to Cherokee Sanford Group on November 4, 1988, simultaneously renewed and
modified October 5, 1995, and modified August 2, 1996 Ito change the name to
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC) and September 24, 1998, is hereby modified this
4th day of November 1999 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE) p
1. MINE NAME RF-+/`.�i�-IDyl�n 'Z. 2. MINING PERMIT # 17-08
3. OPERATORC.(,r-rnli�x_ .SOn(gin" LAG 4. COUNTY 0ilOi J-Or'1
5. ADDRESS 11�1'?O Pn100 R4i{ .�"IR3n Aiml: InlnrrPn RTV ha I
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE In-.ri - lY-, I-.� 7. RIVER BASIN (^GR? rro I-
8. Person(s) contacted at site InlnrrPn R)4ChQ 1 '
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? 4 Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes Ih No
11. Date, last inspected: & / 0 /4Ci 12. Any mining since last inspection? Q Yes Cl No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ,Q Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? © Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
W/A h
,I <,IOok
l`, I'• 2 6 mvc
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: i.✓ l
a
AND QUALITY
+
c�omments: At tnrrl+
17.Other recommendations and comments:
4-o st> limo i—k- )LLunn nnrl 4
1n
Inn AF. ni+ IR Of Jpmry-CA
)i�
po-led Ni1
Inr7ivllYlfP
{^ f
f1 inp. ri-IP.
117r ,j 1:;.'lP,- no r"iP
l=r('.IPfI('.IP.�,f In I�tP 1 �5PPllFY�.
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ® Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes t No Proposed date / /
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0. 21. Copy of Report sent to operator T!-- /Oa
G (date)
INSPECTED BY. i /.RAJ. AlH. tAO" DATE 1) / 1 / oi;�
Telephone No: (4191 Si I-L-19 /tf.
White copy to frle Yellow copy to operulOr Pink copy 10 Mining Specialist 10197

Re: IFwd: Sedment Basin 5ludgel
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Sedment Basin Sludge]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:28:48 -0400
From: John Holley <[e-mail]>
To: judy wehner <[e-mail]>
It's my recollection that DWQ will not have any problems with this as long as
they see the test results first. once you have that information, please
forward so that I can review it with DWQ (Steve Mitchell). Thanks
Judy wehner wrote:
> Please find attached the proposed disposal for the sludge from the
> Calgon application. They are also contacting Calgon for the testing of
> the sludge material. Let me know as soon as possible if you have any
> problems with this. Thanks.
> --------------------------------------------------------------_---_-------
> Subject: Sedment Basin Sludge
> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:25:03 -0400
> From: Warren Paschal <[e-mail]>
> Organization: Cherokee Sanford Group
> To: Judy Wehner <[e-mail]>
> Judy,
> As you are aware, Cherokee recently excavated the sludge material from
> the sediment basin at the .Brickhaven No. 2 mine. As we discussed the
> sludge recently excavated from the sediment basin will be utilized in
> brick manufacturing. Once the material has dried sufficiently, the
> excavated material will be placed in a normal stockpile. Please feel
> free to call me at [phone] if you have additional questions or
> concerns.
> Thanks,
> Warren
1 of 1 10/28/1999 5:27 PM

IFwd: Bedmant Basin Sludges
Subject: IFwd: Sedment Basin Sludge]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:21 :45 -0400
From: Judy wehner <Judy.Wehner@ncmail. net>
Organization: DENRJOLR
To: John Holley <[e-mail]>
Please find attached the proposed disposal for the sludge from the
Calgon application. They are also contacting Calgon for the testing of
the sludge material. Let me know as soon as possible if you have any
problems with this. Thanks.
Subject: Sedment Basin Sludge
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14;25:03 -0400
From: Warren Paschal < [e-mail] >
Organization: Cherokee Sanford Group
To: Judy Wehner <Judy.Wehner@ncmail. net>
Judy,
As you are aware, Cherokee recently excavated the sludge material from
the sediment basin at the Brickhaven No. 2 mine. As we discussed the
sludge recently excavated from the sediment basin will be utilized in
brick manufacturing. Once the material has dried sufficiently, the
excavated material will be placed in a normal stockpile. Please feel
free to call me at [phone] if you have additional questions or
concerns.
Thanks,
Warren
;\ 10/2811999 4:28 PM

j e �
�d�nacG_h�c
�f �d 9a� f0 erf��f_C°aOJazi

5
l
n
�
l
�X
A!
ry

Brickhaven #2 (19-08) Modification 0 0
Subject: Briickhaven #2 (19-08) Modification
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:58:45 -0400
From: John Holley <[e-mail]>
To: Judy Wehner <[e-mail]>
CC: Robin Caldwell <[e-mail]>,
Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
We have reviewed the subject application, and I have discussed it with
DWQ staff (you may recall I discussed the floc piece with Steve Mitchell
some time ago). I offer the following comments for your consideration:
(1) In that this design follows the same logic/details as the previous
Colon Mine submittal, my reservations about using brick -bat dams for
100-ac. watersheds still apply. I would only recommend approval under
the same conditions used for that similar project. The surface areas
available appear less than indicated by the designer, based on the topo
provided; however, the surface areas I estimated (assuming the basins
fill up) should provide acceptable settling efficiency for the 2-yr.
storm event.
(2) The use of the floc appears very good, and should provide for
satisfactory treatment of the runoff from the current active area. We
should encourage them to continue this process and use it elsewhere on
the project as the expansion moves to the north. Steve Mitchell has
indicated that they will need to see where the sludge from the settling
ponds will be disposed, and they will need an initial test of the sludge
to verify that it will not be toxic. I recommend that appropriate
conditions be added to the permit to address these requirements.
(3) DWQ indicates that the overall plan is acceptable to them as long as
we approve the S&E and the operator follows the WQ general permit
requirements associated with testing, etc.
Approval is recommended with the above conditions addressed in the
permit. If there are any questions, please advise.
1 of 1 10/28/1999 11:58 AM

NCWRC.HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone]
•
Oct 40199 9:04 No.002 P.01
FAX COVER
Falls Lake Office
Date /0 1 v - 99
Number of pages Including cover sheet .3
To:
Sr.Z54w
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
11421-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, NC 27522
From:
Phone Phone [phone]
Fox Phone Fax Phone [phone]
Cc:

NCIdR(-,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL-919-528-9839
Oct M 99 9:04 No.002 P.02
North Carolina W lc ife Resources Commission®
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733.3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MLMORANT)UM
TO: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
FROM: Owen Anderson
Piedmont Habitat Coordinator
ITabitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 26, 1999
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Cherokee Salford Group
Brickhaven No. 2, Chatham County, Permit No, 19-05.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
subject permit renewal and modification request. Our comments are provided in accordance
with provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 (as amended, 1982) (G.S. 74-76 through 74-68 15
NCAC 5).
Cherokee Sanford Brick Co., Inc. is requesting a modification of its current mining
permit. This clay mine is currently approximately 94 acres in size, but the proposed
modifications to the minim; permit will disturb another 288 acres in Chatham County, Gulf
Creek, a WS IV strcam in the Crape Fear River Basin, appears to be located near the property.
The permit modification application lacks information concerning wooded buffer zones
located between land disturbing activities and nearby streams. We recommend that an
undisturbed butter of at least 100-feet be maintained between any land disturbing activities and
adjacent perennial streams or waterways. For intermittent streams, we recommend a 50-foot
undisturbed buffer. Maintaining the undisturbed buffer along Gulf Creek and other streams near

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Oct * 99 9:05 No.002 P.03
Cherokee Sanford Mine 2 October 26, 1999
Permit No. 19-05
the property, as well as proper erosion and sediment control structures, will minimize impacts to
fisheries and aquatic resources.
The information about future land -use plans calls for 86% pasture operations. Planned
pasture and fescue -based grass seeding provides little value for wildlife. Because land
reclamation provides an opportunity to improve existing wildlife habitat, we recommend that
plantings include herbaceous species and a variety of tree species that will he more attractive and
bcneirwiai to wildlife. Native warm season grasses provide better habitat for many species of
wildlife and good forage for grazing animals; therefore, the applicant may want to consider these
as an alternative to fescue.
We would refer the Applicant to Surface Mine Reclamation As Fish and Wildlife Habitat,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1997, and/or George Strader, District Wildlife
Biologist at [phone] for additional information and ideas on reclamation for wildlife.
We can concur with the modification provided the above conditions are considered in the
application.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and to comment on this mining permit
application. Il` we can provide further assistance, please contact Ron Small, Assistant Fisheries
Biologist, at (330) .547-9552, or me at [phone].
RS/OFA/ofa
cc: Warren Paschal, Environmental Compliance Manager

^a�.�..-+^•a+�.
/ DATE TO ASSISTANIR9 DATE* SUSAN
LAGGED IN
�1 p MINING nCHECKLIST FOR ROUTING �}, G
Company ! A921R'91��`F6GGC Project Name CN.LGHi'I,244 ZAQ
r
Permit No. /9-or County r/la, Date Received 9�d3i44
Reviewer 1 / aaA b X . Ao" / /
V
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
❑ Fee Received: Amount 6bo w
Please route to:
❑ �000Field Office Date Routed`
� Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed .�
v
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
i
Other: bug Date Routed
suspense Date for Comments: /U R2 (Date received +30 days,
not an weekend)
❑V Please note the following:
4m/ tad vy iGt)val
\* US SAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
/ White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

® ® e

0
EnV NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
September 24, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Owen Anderson
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Susan B. Edwards,
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Cherokee Sanford
Brickhaven No. 2 - Permit No. 19-05
Chatham County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification
request for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation
having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)).
Please respond by October 22, 1999 so that we may complete our review of this
request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment
control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site
sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on
wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to
perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting
this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your
comments to the person noted in the application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION
MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS
OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly
appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at [phone] if you have any
questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
LAND QUALITY SEly"' [phone] FAX [phone]
GEOLOCICAI SURVEY SECTION I919I 733-2423 FAX[phone]
P.O. BOX 27617. RALEIGH, NORTH CARouR A 27611-7687 TELEPHONE[phone] FAX [phone]
AN EOUALOPPORTUN IVY/A PFIRMATIVC ACTION EMPLOYER -60%n[cCLEC/10%POSPCNN66MER PAPER

11

® ® ��
SFp 4
6 231999
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name
2. Name of Applicant*,
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail**
4. Mine Office
5, Mine Manal
cw;%-�
County
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature Oa ty , Pa&a ,j d Date VnIge
Print Name Warren Paschal
Title Environmental Comvliance Maraud
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the time that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond or other securi[v that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
Signature of company officer required.
G. S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt of
a comnlete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
® NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon): N/A
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: 382 Acres leased:
0 Property owner if leased.-
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the Honing permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: NIA Total
permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be
based upon): NIA
If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: 19-04 Total permitted acreage: 382
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage that
the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 288.10
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes_ No X . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application form entitled
Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes X No_ (if no, a "minor modification" fee
of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes, indicate the acreage to
be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to be added to the permit
is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 270.7
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: Total
permitted acreage: NIA
® SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Indicate the approximate longitude and latitude, in degrees -minutes -seconds, of the center of the mine site:
LONGITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 79 -- 01 --!2 Quadrangle: Moncure,NC
LATITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 35 -- 36 -- 10
-2-

s
3. Name of all materials mined: _ Clay
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck X Shovel & Truck X
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper X Other (explain)
5. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 40' Reference elevation: 2001(iowest elevation)
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 40'
6. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes x No If no, proceed to Question 7.
a. Acreage of previously affected land(s) at present site that has not been reclaimed:
86.6 acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted? Cherokee Sanford Brick., Inc.
c. Acreage of previously affected land at present site that has been reclaimed: 0 acres (identify
all areas on your mine map(s)).
d. When and by whom was this activity conducted? NIA
e. Do you wish to exclude any areas noted in 6a or c from this permit application?
Yes No x . If yes, how much? acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
7. Present (pre -mining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry270.7 acres Fish/Wildlife acres
Recreation acres Other 86.6 acres (Specify use: mining }
8. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture 330.6 acres Forestry 24.7 acres Fish/Wildlife 26.7 acres
Recreation acres Other acres (Specify use: )
9. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10
B. MAPS
Four (4) copies of the county highway maps and four (4) copies of all mine maps and reclamation maps
shall be submitted with each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
Clearly label and mark the location of your miring operation on the county highway maps.
-3-

}
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits can
only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all, mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conductedJuring the life of the mining permit. All maps must be
of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, at a
minimum:
a. Property lines of the tractor tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located .
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location and
distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site" buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100 year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land.
p. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales must, at a minimum, meet the following guidelines.
PERMITTED ACREAGE
0-99 Acres
100-499 Acres
500+ Acres
MAP SCALE
1 inch = 50 feet
1 inch = 100 feet
].'rich = 200 feet
-4-

1 ,
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
12.37
Stockpiles
3.38
Wastepiles
0
Processing Area/Haul Roads
8.05
Mine Excavation
358.2
Other
0
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN
THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
=5-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheel is to be used to establish an appropriate bond (based upon a remge
of $500 to $5, 000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approved by the
Department to be affected during the life of the mining permit.
Please insert the ativroximale acreage for each aspect rifft mining operation, that you intend to affect dnrirre
the life of this miningpermit
fin a"fion please insert the appropriate
reclamation cosilacre
for each cute
from the Schedule of
Reclamation Costs provided with this application form):
-
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
RECLAMATION
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE
COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
12.37 Ac. ' ! X
$ 2,500.00 /Ac. _ $
30,925.00
Stockpiles
3.38
Ac.
"X
Wastepiles
0
Ac.
. Ix
Processing Area/Haul Roads
8.05
Ac.
X
Mine Excavation
358.24
Ac.
X
Other
I
Ac.
X
TOTAL ACREAGE:
382.0
Ac
Additional Reclamation Cost Factors:
a. Internal Drainage
143.69 Ac.
$
2,500.00
/Ac.
= $
8.450.00
$
2,50000
/Ac.
_ $
0.00
$
5 000 00
Me,
— $
40 250 00
S
2,500 00
/Ac. _
$
895,600 00
$
/Ac.
— $
b. Positive Drainage 238.31 Ac. X $ 1,500 /Ac. = $ 357,465
SUBTOTAL COST: S 1,332,690
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: $ 26,653.80 X Permit life (1 to 10 years): 10 years
INFLATION COST: $ 266,538
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COST+ INFLATION COST = S 1,599,228
TOTAL RECLAMATION BOND COST: _ $ 1,599,200
(round down to the nearest $100.00)
Note: Cherokee Sanford Brick Co., Inc. has a S500,000 blanket bond.
=6

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations
as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G. S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature
Print Name' Cherokee Sanford Brick Co. LLC
Address .Cherokee Sanford Brick Co_ Inc.
1600 Colon Road Sanford, NC 27330
Telephone [phone]
APPLICANT: ,Q
Signature' lAL/I�uc.-- /�-Q-*.-Q
Print Name: Warren Paschal
Title: Environmental Compliance Manager
Company: Cherokee Sanford Brick Co. Inc
Mine Name: Brickhaven No. 2
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
e near page mr ice seneawe) in me mrm a enectc or money order pay
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent to
:e at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program
staff at [phone] -
7

s 2 �
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE COMPANY
3008 ANDERSON DRIVE, SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NIC 27609
[phone]
September 22, 1999
Mr. Warren Paschal
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Re: Erosion Control Evaluation
Mine Permit Modification
Brickhaven No.2 Mine Permit No.19-04
Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Paschal:
The following is a general discussion of the mine modification, general erosion control, and
erosion control structure. The conclusions of this evaluation are reflected on the
accompanying mine maps.
GENERAL PROJECT DISCUSSION
The Brickhaven No. 2 Mine (Permit No. 19-08) in Chatham County, North Carolina,
contains 382 acres of permitted land. Approximately 93.90 acres of this land has been
disturbed, and an additional 288.10 acres will be disturbed within the next ten years. In
addition to the excavation for materials that produce brick, petroleum -contaminated materials
and other non -hazardous recyclable materials are stockpiled at this site and are later blended
with the mined materials to produce brick. Stockpiling of petroleum -contaminated materials
and other non -hazardous recyclable materials will be discontinued in 5-10 years.
Within the three exposed petroleum contaminated soil storage area, the runoff is collected
by basins and discharge through two spray irrigation systems. One system deposits of the
majority of the water into pine trees. Some of the water is applied onto one of the access
drives by a smaller spray irrigation system. Non -discharge permits for the contaminated soil
storage and contact water disposal are under permit numbers SR-0500046 and QW0007589.
For the excavated and blended stockpiles containing virgin and contaminated soil, three
erosion control structures in series within a ditch provide erosion control for these areas.
Precipitation collects in the current active mining excavation area, Area G. This water is
periodically pumped into a settlement basin where the water drains by gravity. Experimental
reduction of sediment in the water is being conducted on the water before discharge to the

1%
pump discharge basin. The water is treated with Calgon Cat -Floc DL (catatonic liquid
polymer). (Attachment A) At other areas of the mine, excavation may also be below the
brick outlet structures and removal of water will require pumping, sediment basins are
proposed for these areas, or the pump discharge could be transferred to an adjacent basin.
Currently, mining activities will continue from mine area G in a northern direction. Mining
activities will be performed in areas of close proximity to the existing CP&L Power Line.
Per the right of way, in agreement with CP&L, excavation is allowed in the power line area.
However, excavation can not be within 40ft of the power line anchors and the ground can
not be sloped steeper than 3:1(H: V). Furthermore, access to the power lines by CP&L
should be maintained.
As the northward expansion of the mine continues, it will be necessary to construct six (6)
new erosion control structures in their respective watershed areas. Excavation of soils will
need to be performed to meet basin requirements. Runoff from mining activities will be
directed, with the aid of diversion berms, to the respective basins where the outlet control
will be maintained by the utilization of brick bat check dams.
After mining activities are complete, the disturbed areas will be sloped for positive drainage,
re -vegetated in grasses, and the erosion control structures will be removed. The mine pump
and pump lines will be removed and an approximately 26.7 acre lake or larger will be formed
at Area G. To form the lake outlet, the berm between the mine and the water will be
allowed to discharge from the basin conduit. The conduit can pass the 100-year rain event
with the area remaining disturbed.
EVALUATION
The TR-55 method was conducted to evaluate the peak flow rates and runoff volumes for
the 10-year, 25-year, and 100-year rain events. All soils were assumed to be within the "D"
Hydrologic Soil Group. For the calculations, the maximum possible land disturbance was
assumed.
The surface of each basin was based on the 10-year rain event peak flow rate. However, to
fit the basins to the existing ground, the basins were designed to hold the 10-year rain runoff
volume.
For the brickbat outlet sections, the crest length was based on limiting the water depth above
the crest 3 inches. Stability analyses for scour of the brick ( incipient motion of brick
particles was determined for the 4:1 (H: V) downslope section of the brick. These analyses
(assuming no more than 3 inches of water overtopping the crest) indicate that a suitable
factor of safety against brick score is at least 3.9. Stability of the downslope brick section
was also evaluated for failure caused by seepage forces by steady state seepage through the
brick structure. This analysis indicates a suitable factor of safety of 3.7
62$
//J

I
The surface area of the pump discharge basin was based on a maximum flow rate of 2100
gallons per minute with this rate assumed equivalent to the 10-year peak flow rate for surface
area sizing. The basin was sized for nearly twice that actually required. .
For the existing basin G, the culvert outlet will remain in place to serve as an outlet for the
approximately 26.7 acre lake. For the 100-year rain event and with the ground remaining
exposed the water level would rise about 3.7ft above the culvert's invert. This would result
in a nominal discharge rate of 3 6cfs.
CLOSURE
We appreciate serving Cherokee Sanford Group on this project. Please contact us if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
T¢ T. Patrick Shil mg[oq
President
Attachment A: Calgon Cat -Floc DL MSDS Sheet
Attachment B: Calculations
EIS

0
0
Attachment A: Calgon Cat -Floc DL MSDS Sheet
62$

PYG-tlti-btl ttlaC hm Vma.bY numary anrvh uvu na. •u. a .r �o� �r.ec �
•
CAT -FLOC® DL
��ULlV Cationic Liquid Potymer
Product Description: CAT -FLOC OL is a medium molealar weigh, liquid cationic polyelearolyte. it is
used as a primary coagulant or coagulant aid in wafer and wastewater caarification. It is highly effective
as a replacement for, or Can be used in conjunction with, inorganic coagulants such as ferric salts or
alum. CAT -FLOG DL is chlorine resistant and effective over a broad pH range. CAT -FLOC DL is
available in pfasbc pails, steel or pkasbc drums, recydable bins, and bulk.
Features: Benefits:
• Liquid polymer .
NSF ynlemataaalcernfied
• Unique high charge, medium molecular
weight cationic polymer
• Fors a strong floc
• May reduce or replace inorganic coagulants
• Easy to teed
• Acceptable for use in drinking water
applications
• Effectwe in a wide range of wastewater and
water clarification applicatims
• Improved finished water quality
• Reduce sludge generation
Fmironlnental and Toxicity DOM: See product MSDS for complete twdoobgical and environmental
intormaion.
Regulatory Status: CAT -FLOC DL conforms to the requirements of ANSVNSF
Standard 60 - Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals - Health Effects. GAT -FLOC OIL is
certified by NSF /nremaUpnel as a coagulation aid flocculation drinking water treatment
chemical to a maximum feed rate of 57 ngrt. 0
FDA Apprwed Sections: 176.180 components of paper and paperboard in contact with dry food.
176.170 components of paper and paperboard in contact with
aqueous and tatty foods Typical Pray.rta% to zs°cf
D.O.T. Class ....... ...... __.______________Not
D.O.T. Proper Shipping Name_..—...._.._.... Not App
Harrtlge:ling end StoraImproper handling of drillcan he injurious b workers. Observe art safety pre
shoves on the /abet aMin the Alielis"Sefey Dal
Keep tom fi ng. Store CAT -FLOG DL polymer
buildings or heat -traced tanks to prevent freezing.
this product a freeze -thaw stable, stratification m
upon freezing. CAT -FLOG OIL polymer will becorm
on again upon agitati.
Restricted Form Iquq
licabke
bwamrxs wacous, elan, paw
t product "Ilm to eaaaea
carom s Sp� Gmvly 1.N
a Sheri
PH 5-e
in heated
Although vsmatiyd Pmtud,rm xooaoo
eT occur Fawze Poi�a (F7 32
e uniform
ne:n vane i Fl .zoo
nutleEn W. 6Ef41: Rw.6
nutleEn W. 6Ef41: Rw.6

AUC-OG-99 10.13 FROM.CSG ADMIN 9ANFORD NC 10,8197745300 PAGE 3/9
r1
L-A
Feeding: CAT-FLDC OIL polymer may be fed neat as long as in -
line dilution is provided. However, ddudm to 1% as product is
recommended to assure better O"M of the coagulant With the
impurities in the water. A Calgor SD, P-18 or MDS feed system
is recommended. Neat polymer feed systems shall be capable
Of handling 1000 CPS viscosily material. A variety of chemical
feed systems are available from Calgon to satisfy your specific
application needs, Please Contact your local Calgon
representative or our Chemical Equipment Group for feed
system recornmendabons.
Dosage Requirements: Product feed rate will be site and
application specific. and may vary as conditions change. Product
demand may be determined by a screening test using Jar Test
procedures.
Materials of Compabbillity: CAT -FLOC DL polymer is
moderately corrosive to iron and copper, inducing their alloys.
Storage tanks, chemical feed systems, arod piping should be
constructed of high density (HDPE) or crosslinked (XLPE)
poyethylene, fiberglass (FRP) with polyester or vinylester resins,
epoxy -or vinylesler-luhed steel.
Disposal: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal
regulations. Disc-arded prodlrc; as sold, is not considered a
HCRA hazardous waste.
Yamoiaad Comparlbliy
raaeriN
Sad.
Still
Carbon ales'
x
3% Sainleta Brest
x
316 SMini Stxl
x
PolyoNylen9-ppeatlhrked
x
Pavahwora-IOW den
x
Polyary"-tign da
x
Pplygppyrena
x
Pvp
x
CI
If
Kynar
x
Mon
x
Nooprit"
x
BumIN Rubbar
x
sitm a ss
x
FRP ftlrphenoe
x
FR➢llsphmarc)
x
Piastre 7122(upo")
x
Plasdte 41M(Vhyi Baer)
x
The inbnnaion and recomme:tdirroo maainid in this doelmav are posanted in good farm and believed M d reliable, ha shW[
W W Iran 0 that Store and NM0'pv of tale M any WgDn prodAd Bgcai fo :rany factors aMBLt prod ad adllGah.M1 and
pant = is s, eery Cagan euatarrsr mist deS. Ica ie M by dndpNng app ' OR tau «eta numobs, Mueller RN a
pods} s shade M mat arRODUs needs. RRIEV N SION.T E WRITTEN, ORAL. Eti:PREsOBTAINED
OR IMPLIED Use
08 THE
ACCURACY THE CALOF T E INFO fM INFORMATION
AND ECOM ,THE TIONS S CONTAINED 8E OBTAINED FROM THEIR USE, IC THE
ACCURACY OE USE A THE OFMEACTrON AND RECOMMEND FORPART(GHEREIN. CALOON SPECIFICALLY
DISfxAafS THE WARRANTIES 6 MERG1AfITA&Id1T Ua0 FlTNE9E FOR A PARL11.alVA PURPOSE.
Womatron mrcwnirg human and emtonmenm as9dare may bo mwawad an rod Magdal Safety Idea Shot for the product. For
additional information regarding indent; moinng human and Brwi avointal eoposum call 1-BOde55-0o90 arof Ink lotto Health
and EnvironTgrd Ataha DapanmNR.
At romas in COWfaea are ty y ynt oe aervka mane of Colgon Co"loo
Am
INNOVATNE TECHNOLOGIES. CREATIVE SOLUFIONIS... SINCE 1518
BuIIWr No. SE24: Raw, able

AUG-06-99 10,14FROM,C60 ADMIN 6HNFORD NC IO�9194746300 PAGE 4/9
A Cat -Floc DL •
PPittEbUrgh, PA .O. Box 1396
off— e O e — hont(412 494.g00D1346
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Section 1. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCTNAME: Cat -Floc DL
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION: Aqueous solution of cationic homopoymer
PRODUCTCLASS: Watertreatrnent
MSDS CODE: 066&W-2696
Section 2. INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
CAS % by
Chemical Name yumber Weight OSHA FEL A CIH TLV
'No ingredients listed in this section'
This product is not considered to be hazardous eocovding to th cdteria of the U.S. Federal OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.12W0 and is not a controlled produa under WHMIS in Camada-
Section 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
+r*+++%%%rtf wrwwff*fff EMERGENCYOVERVIEW
This product poses tittle or no immediate hazard.
+r*µ1R*flfYin%+%ff%%*f%+µvv+*f#f##4#v»vrr+W ik*t k+ttwa vrt*'k*µf%R*%4
PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: None
TARGETORGANS: None
MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: Unknown
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: TM product would not be expected to produce imitation upon contact with Me eye.
SKIN CONTACT: The product is not expected to cause skin irritation upon contact. Data indicate that this
product will not produce an allergic skin reaction or be a bso"d through the skin in harmful amounts.
INGESTION: This product would be expected to be practically non-tDluo by ingestion.
INHALATION: This product is not expected to present an inhalation hazard.
MSDS Code: 0666-034696 Page 1
Issue Date. 10/31/96 Continued on Page 2

ne as
W..
,.,.
ol,nrunu_
o.
Ak
Cat -Floc
DL
SUBCHRONIC, CHRONIC:
In a subohmnlo fox city study using rats, the cationic flomopolymer in this product was administered orally at
doses of 5.50. and 500 mg/kg. Animals in the 50 mg,4 group showed decreased weight gain, decreased food
consumption and increased slasping tfme.
Animals in the 500 rI group showed decreased weight gain, decreased food consumption, and alterations m
red blood oees and blood proteins. Animals in the 5 mgft group showed no effects- Twelve-month leading
studies using rats and dogs given 2 and 200 ppm active ingredient in dnrddng water showed no significant
ativerse effects.
A similar product has been shown not to be mufageric by the Ames assay. A teratotogy study in rabbits and a
two -generation fapmrLotion study in rats showed this product did rot produce birth dofocts or affect
reproduction. ..
CARCINOGENICITY:
NTP:
'No ingredtetm Wed in this section'
IARC:
.No ingredients Gsted in this section'
OSHA:
-No ngredierns listed in this section'
Section 4. FIRST AID MEASURES
EVE CONTACT: Not expected to require first aid measures. However, follow good industrial hygiene practices and.
in rase of coraact, flush eyes with plenty of water.
SKIN CONTACT: Not expected to require Arai aid measures. However, follow good industrial hygiene procures and,
in case of contact, wash affected skin areas thomuI with soap and water.
INGESTION: Not an expected mute of overexposure. If swallowed, do rot induce vomiting. Call a physicorx This
product would be expected to be practically non -toxic by ingesaon-
INHAL4TIONNot an expected route of overexposure.
Section 5. FIRE -FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASH POINT: > 200-F
This product is na by definition a "flammable liquid" or a "Combustible I
LOWER FLAMMABLE OMIT: Not available UPPER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: Not available
AUTO -IGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not available
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use extinguishing media appropriate for the sumoundhg fire.
FIRE -FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Exercise caution when fighting any chemical Tire. A sell -contained breathing
apparatus and protective clothing are essential.
FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Product emits toxic gases under fire mrxLtions.
MSDS Code: 0666U3.26.96 Page 2
Issue bate: 10/31/95 Continued d on Page 3

kCat -Floc OL o.
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Theimal decomposition or combustion may produce carton monoxide, carbon
dioxide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, arKUor nitrogen oxides.
NFPA RATINGS: Heats = 0 Flammability = 1 Reactivity c 0 Special Hazard = None
IIvaM nMry aWe:0lalnimallighi 2�llpda�ab 3der�p,s c-=Sprnra
Section 6- ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Wearing appropriate persorsl protective
equipment, contain spill, collect onto mart absodserd and place into suitable container. Spilled product may
make floor slispery, spills should be cleaned up immediately to prevent falls.
Section 7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: As pan of good industrial and personal hygiene and safety procedure, avoid all unnecessary
exposure to the product and ensure prompt removal tram eyes, skin and clothing.
Wash draoughly after han0ling.
Keep container closed when rot in use.
STORAGE: Protect from low temperatures.
Do not store in stainless steel bulk tanks.
Section S. EXPOSURE CONTROLS 1 PERSONAL PROTECTION
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT:
EYEJFACE PROTECTION: Chemical splash goggles recommended as a good indusmal hygiene practice.
SKIN PROTECTION: No special requirement
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: None required.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: No specific recommendations.
UNSATISFACTORY MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION: Cancan steel and copper
Section 9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
SOILING POINT: > 212'F (> 100'C) SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete
VAPOR PRESSURE: Similar w water SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 1.02 • 1.04
VAPOR DENSITY (air-1): Similar to water pH: SO - 8.0 ® 25"C
%VOLATILE BY WEIGHT: - 82 FREEZING POINT: Na available
MSDS Code: 0668 03-25-96 paste 3
Issue Date: 1N31196 Continued on Page 4

AUG-06-90
10.16
FROM
-CSC
ADMIN
6ANFORD NC
10.9157745300
PAGE
7/9
Cat -Floc DL
Ali
APPEARANCE AND ODOR: Slghtlyvismus, dear, yenow Iigtdd-
Section 10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable HAZARDOUS POLYMER17ATION: Wilt not occur
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: No specific information.
INCOMPATIBILITY: Strong adds and eases
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Themeel decromposition or combustion may produce carbon monoxide, carbon
dcrdde, hydrogen chloride, ammcrlia, and/or nitrogen oxides.
Section 11_ TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ON PRODUCT:
Product Orel LDw (rat): 25-5 gkg (350/9 solution of the polymer)
Product Dermal LDm (rabbicl: > 20 gft (lesbrig on a 40% solution of Me polymer)
Eye irdtaborc Draize scare = 81110 (for 35% solution of the polymer)
Skin irritation: PSII = 1.0/8 (tor 35%solution of the polymer)
Section 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ON PRODUCT:
See information on polymer below.
ON INGREDIENTS:
Chemical Name
Poly(dimethyldiallylammonium chlodde)-40% solution
Section 13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
ADuatic Toxicily Data
96 hr LC50 (bluegill sunfish): 0.82 - 1.3 ppm
95 hr LC50 (rainbow trout): 0.37 ppm
4B hr LC50 (Daphnia magma): 0.9 ppm (in clear water)
48 hr LC50 (Daphnia Magna): 1.2 - 2.5 ppm (in 50 ppm
play suspension)
4B hr LC50 (Daphnia magns): 24.8 ppm (in 1000 ppm clay
suspension)
Note a substantial neduction in toxicity is observed under
turbid conditions.
RCRA STATUS: Discarded product, as sold, would not be considered a RCRA Hazardous Waste.
DISPOSAL- Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal regdtlfi .
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 4
Issue Data: 10131M Continued on Page 5

nuc-us-ice rn. a t un.uyu Hunrry anrvrueu rvc rr�� '7 a Cat -Floc DL
Section 14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT CLASSIFICATION:
ClacrCivislore Not restricted
Proper $Nipping Name: Not applicable
Label: None
Packing Group: Notapplicable
ID Number: Not applicabie
Section 15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
OSHA Hazard Communicatmn Status: Nonhazardous
TSCA: The ingredients of this product are fisted on the Toxic Substances Control Ad (TSCA) Chemical Substances
Inventory.
CERCLA reportable quantity of EPA hazardous substances in product
Chemical Name RRR�C
No ingredients of tlds product have CERCLA reportable quantities.
Product RQ Not applicable (Notify EPA of product spills exceeding this amount.)
SARA TITLE III:
Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances
Chemical Name CAS a Bar TPC
There are no SARA 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances in this product.
Secfbn 311 and 312 Health and Physical Herds:
Immedate Delayed Fire Pressure Reactivity
(no) (no] [no[ (nol [no]
Section 313 Tuck Chemicals:
Ch iral Name GAS it %%by Weight
There are no reportable SARA 313 Toxic Chemicals in this product.
FDA: This product is FDA approved under 21 CFR Section(s):
176.170 (Components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty foods)
176.180 (Components or paper and paperboard in caved with dry food)
Consult your Cori representative for any use Imutaticru.
MSDS Code_ 0666-03-26-96 Page 5
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Continued on Page 6

AUG-06-99 10,17 FROM=CSG ADMIN SANFORD NC ID�SIU77%"00 .MUL 7i7
L Cat -Floc DIL . 1
Section 96. OTHER INFORMATION
HMIs RATINGS: Health =0 Iti mmaudity=1 Reactivity=D
Per9Gnal PIOteCtive Equipinant = A
Ha nl MIN;K Ie:W iniral t=fty 2=MOGXtate 3-Se js X-SaysfA
MSDS REVISION SUMMARY: Supersedes MSDS issued on 1211y9c The MSDS has been changed in Section
15.
tRil± @-, mfo:re[iw uE ret fora he Are CeL:r: t to to '=UrC 6:ce [ereof. CAL45w
CORYeRA:SOH TTXPS tlL IYMiMPP M?X A PLC: KRZZo M9 OLSCLADIV AT Ll ZL2 — PR'A1 R =ANCF TNCAEOF.
PREPARED BY: P.J. Maloney
MSDS Code: 06660326-96 Page S
Issue Date: 1=1/96 Last Page

® 0

I� -----
The 7-1-6-5- 6 J wlr� aYO Vp N'/ UJNS LIj/
__.___......._
fe.;f 4'! Y✓Nd 1/��N�+t•J.�.._Td1..�_____.—.._—__—_..—.
M,. yr v.�/t.�l�Sa✓,,.nr.V
_ —
,� /_- L-t .l d�,/_ /Yy(/✓//"S/�,_GVd4� .b.Hf_S �.4iNNt� !��_^___-- ____.—____..__..
I V
I
--------------- - ------ _ ..... - -..--
I
,
IF�� a�6�s exLP_t {h F� eX.s}.,5 sY�..fMAOLVO5
Ar
- _... ,�,;
.C/C5_JS�rPff _�o 6fu'-e f-kP _ /!r �✓� !�'a.r2_Pv��
-
feu N—f5 PX61_lplf/_._4C�Oc✓ fhr P✓s�Jf9�_CdNfvd�
_-.__...
.IS /_✓'-uc rM �__UVf-/fT _ _—R rHfD �Io� U�..._(.«4.��L �� 11l%Is��Q[=/
rk f t &Ln -1`r e p�. ,� U Hlati _ %Fl iwj � le) cJ a /erg
-- — -- -�
/�a5h S•Ze Lf.6ff�U.y/)=D;ocl6�6 at
----- -- --- - -----._.._.-..
—
— --
—
�,i—
-
u,4a j zwo F1 �;�Lo —
- -��-
5'� ADD.----------------
---- --- -
�
QS�r`GleP�Sf�'liy5`��
=d+1✓�Y�$yrc��y j�
+N2iY b �Lu¢�ly y ��[j�i'R�yi}gg+{����pp ' � t�t�y
'Y �5� �p
�l �\ 'mil ��rrin.!.
L�`Y.>*NMiyY.. Ytl➢���u
ira 3Jw•Y

..... ...... ...
--- -------
----- ---- ly q7ew#41
ol �-Y�/

CZ4 CBG3�/1
i iJ "ft,v VVCf.I
'UV/'.,
`fHs/I!
s c{ i
l
ell
0,3fu �
I
ly6 /6�"� !
�5 zr'vo67;
ill S'P6�1
K.y
443 6/SJ�e
P
l,Alr�
' Gr3 k�,11 j
.r-��
612- 1
'!lam
ei r
I
itlrr'
i I i I
!
IS S, i i
��,yi
'�C/,%
5j3fs?D
WJ2'636y
i
1%y
4QeS•FFfrri
Gu uydufll2
I
!
213
j2/UdoF/3
17�9G •r��1'i
a-1G�'
S
IG7�Z I
i�-Q I
1
Ile 4
C
�3,r6'
i3,�
.LFj�YirO
!,
rG3i
�zyi%Off
(Gi
LH11-7aofts
c�lsza�t,
l7fsji
I�SSI,
I�b
vrh57Jryth�
jbv7ofF3
to2�ftOZ�
1 �5/vOfi31
y25o�t3i,
`6g
sos�oft
p 7+5�r�thl
Iaq
25 °or3
S Sub r
117cFs
31i
1z7�.yWk
7135 r7
7 65
15tf15
µtS I
r
APJ I,riM
:--
�—
�-
i
yG)sr�lC 6.kaL l;el, i v� Lv6,n Cr I C�i) See oHt4>seco! %�Q
i erf-
�7� 1 SP�i�PN7/I [•f ,Y�S`4✓?y I I I, QNJ �i"��i pi- y'G4!'/rf
YS �frr'^3C i i
3
— /Ve fcofit � i utlef
hill xe
-it.
1 (d�1°O . fq °f c 1 1 1 i--
S ti72,sl !3, G: d N«lepoA t,l.,'rY
6•Sn S:' = e[ruh f7 /rem vunuFF! L =%erN4
I UrUT jaK)

C -
2 year r day precipienion (inches)
ra
wi. i. •iN
im
— xf fo
RAINFALL DATA MAP 3
3 3.5 7.5 y�L 3.5
Ji`� ..A.
7
t
frL l- I 7 / i
y
/t
- y s N 1..: It
3.5 t.Na.\All/
1 50
4` i ^'
1 Am
4.5
Pf
w
w
4.5
s
•

0
u
d
3
a
100-year f day precipitation (inches)
o Vs m rs LOD
IT-1 I: rye\ INN 67ai /e\ a L\ 161
G
5+
10 P
•
0

10-year 1 pay precipitation (inches)
Salr In Sa w
5] >f koo
RAINFALL DATA MAP
4))
46
?'r
all

25-year 1 day precipitation (inches)
o Pl M 25 1M
RAINFALL DATA MAP
ID
8.5
P�
e

1H year 1 day precipitation (inches)
s 4mmll"
o m ao ra rao
RAINFALL DATA MAP _ r� a /f
E
iU r

RUNOFF CUR ONUM,
Project : Brickhaven #2 User:
County : Chatham State: NC Chec
Subtitle: Area A
Subarea: Area A
Hydrologi,
COVER DESCRIPTION
Acres
:01+iPUTATION tersion 2.00
,ate. t,6-12-99
DJ ite:
'roue
B C D
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No V t)
Newly graded area (penious only) - - 81.6(94)
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Pasture, grassland or range good - - 26.9(80)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soils! 108.
SUBAREA: Area A TOTAL D AGE AREA: 108.5 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 91
TIME OF C °_ENTRATIONAND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
Project : Brickhaven #2 - User. Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chathmn NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area A
------------------------- Brea #I - Area A ---------------------------
Flow Type 2 year Les,. Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft) (ft/f, .ode (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)
Sheet 3.7 300 :333 B
0.124
Shallow Concent'd _ 0 .0370 U
0.206
Time of Concentration = 0.33*
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes ---
A Smooth Surfacc F Grass, Dense ---
Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burntuda
--- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light
P Paved
D Cultivated > 20 %Res. I Woods, Dense
U Unpaved
E Grass -Range. Short J Range, Natural
* - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABULAOYDROGRAPH METHOD lion 2.00
Project: Brickhaven 42 User: !ay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area A
Total watershed area: 0.170 sit mi Rainfall type: II Frcquenry: 10 years
Subareas---_-__-_.-�_--
Area A
Area(sq uit 0.17*
Rainfall(m) 5.5
Curvenumber 91•
Runoft(in) 4.47
Tc (Ars) 0.33'
(Used) 0.30
TimeToOmJet 0.00
Ia/P 0.04
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ---
(hr) Flow
Area
11.0
15
15
11.3
21
21
t 1.6
31
31
11.9
89
89
12.0
178
178
12.1
339
339
12.2
512P
512P
12.3
512
512
12.4 348 348
12.5 714 214
12.6 148 148
127 111 Ill
12.8 86 86
13 0 61 61
13.2 50 50
13.4 43 43
13.6 39 39
13.8 35 35
I4.0 32 32
14.3 28 28
14.6 25 25
15.0 23 23
15.5 21 21
16.0 IS 18
16.5 17 17
17.0 15 15
17.5 14 14
18.0 14 14
19.0 12 12
20.0 10 10
22.0 9 9
26.0 0 0
l`A go.23atVr-Ff
Subarea Contribution to Total Flow lets)
P - Peak Flow • - values) provided from TR-55 system routines

TABULA YDRO GRA PH METHOD Aon 2.00
Project : Brickhaven q2 User: Jay Dale: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Dale:
Subtitle: Area A
Total watershed area: 0.170 all mi Rainfall type: 11 Frequency: 25 years
Subareas
Area A
Ares(sq mi) 0.17*
Rainfall(in) 6.4
Curvenumber 91*
Runoff(m) 5.35
Tc (hrs) 0.33'
(Used) 0.30
ThneToOudet 0.00
lafP 0.03
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ------- Subqg,�.ontribudon to Total Flow (cfs)-------
(hr) Flow Area A
11.0 18 18
11.3 25 25
11.6 37 37
11.9 107 107
12.0 213 213
12.1 405 405
12.2 613P 613P
12.3 613 613
12.4 416 416
12.3 257 257
12.6 178 178
12.7 132 132
12.8 103 103
13.0 73 73
L3.2 60 60
13A 52 52
13.6 46 46
13.8 42 42
14.0 38 38
14.3 34 34
14.6 30 30
I5.0 28 28
15.5 25 25
16.0 22 22
16.5 20 20
17.0 18 18
17.5 17 17
I8.0 16 16
19.0 15 15
20.0 12 12
22.0 a 11
26.0 '0 0
P - Peak Flow • - value(s) provided foam TR-55 system routines

ion 2.00
Project : Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area A
Drainage Area: .1695313 Sq miles Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.3 inches
Peak Mow: 613 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 8.51 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 490 cfs
Drainage Area: .1695313 Sq miles Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.3 inches
Peak Inflow: 613 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 13.1 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 315 cfs
Drainage Area: .1695313 Sq miles Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.3 inches
Peak Inflow: 613 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 17.7 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 196 cfs
Drainage Area: .1695313 Sq miles Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Ralnfall-Type: II
Runoff: 5.3 inches
Peak Inflow: 613 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 22.2 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 120 cfs
Drainage Area: .1695313 Sq miles Rainfall. Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.3 inches
Peak Inflow: 613 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 26.8 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 62 cfs

Mil
Md
400
300
0
0.
200
ITIN
Detention Basin Storage Volume (acre-ft) vs. Peak Outflow (cfs) for Area A
. . . . . . . .
=,g
mog
[�Lw, M.
mn
ring Rig
R
OWEN-
'M
00.0 Im Emir,
MUM
101,01
mm
69� =11"
W EMW M.
NORM
NO WHEN
=IXN
= NNW RWRIMM-1.0
17
WIN
MEMO-&
W MIM
M
=00MEEMENERINNINW,
I
r A, MI.
Mr. Immuft
i 00d: M, 011 "11
-
W, 0
am I"
wu�
LIN
NE
US. N M
NMI%
R100,
ANN
we
11M
MMM,,,
Nal
WIT
. ........
K. 490::::.
Emm
W.^
an>yaid
M.
GG
M
NEWS
"MINIM:MNEXAMMIN01%
MIR,
-55
as
ON :
0W
549
NOU,
ar
................
NONE
101
4
low W. 16
NOR
k
N Mimi
J 1155MR,
ERM901
&a
M
M
sm
an
M:
am! oil on
M
F
r,,
W.:::,0
OR
itp=Xtsx.
MIM
aja�
............
17 f
WEWK
M,
MRE
EEIRME,
9W.MMImM M
M
M MmmnamMNZ
IM=
M
no
iiWn
iM"',
H-8
10.
12N
ft1r9,6
N
11M
WN
,F1000W
-S
-irH01_EM
4
NM..­.
EIZ,0ft1.
1N Knw
11ANK
I
8,
US 'r.
MR,
.—NUN
W-, N
_R
0020
WENW,
MM"415.,
MOR
giffim.M.
Ififfix,201'
go
11- ON ON X
"M
X. am
IN
W $MAN
me:
011401.
6
...........
NOW
M.
0, MR
M
NN.
P_
&2 W IN
9M_
��,Nffl W
W5
Am
> TUM F_
Ix•
ENEMA;
MIM
0 -4
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Detention Basin Storage Volume (acre-ft)
0

RUNOFFCOZNUMBER COMPUTATION AhVersion2.00
Project : Brickhaven #2 User'. Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked:- Date:
Subtitle: Area B
Subarea : Area B
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B. C D
- Acres (CN)
--------------------- _.------------ ._..-------------- ..--..___.._..._.._____.
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 29.9(94)
'total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) - `29.9
SUBAREA: Area B TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 29.9 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRA TION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area B
--------- _---------- ___------ Subarea 41 - Area B __.--------------- ...._--_.._
Flow Type 2year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (R) (B/R) code (sq/fl) (fl) (B/sec) (hr)
__________ ---------- ------- -_________. ..-___
Sheet 37 300 .0333 B 0.124
Shallow Concenl'd 1100 0500 U 0.085
Time of Concentration =0.21 t
--- Sheet Flaw Surface Codes ---
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res,) G Gress, Burmuda ---
Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated <20%Res. H Woods, Light
P Paved
D Cultivated> 20 %Res. IWoods,Dense
UUnpaved
E Grass -Range, Short 1 Range, Natural
• - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABULA®iYDR0GRAPH METHOD Pion Zoo
Project Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Dater 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area B
Total watershed area: 0.047 sq mi Rainfall type: II Frequency: 10 years
--------------------------
Subareas --------------------------
Area B
Area(sq mi) 0.05*
Rainfall(in) 5.5
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 4.80
/�
lily e U C 2 9r-1) z !/1 G 4 O Z v p- �4
Te (hrs) 0.21 *
(Used) 0.20
3
C)q -7 7,f �- �p
TimeToOutlet 0.00
Ia/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (efs)------------
(hr) Flow Area B
11.0
5
5
11.3
7
7
11.6
11
11
11.9
47
47
12.0
90
90
12.1
166
166
12.2
179P
179P
12.3
108
108
12.4 56 56
12.5 37 37
12.6 29 29
12.7 23 23
12.8 19 19
13.0 16 16
13.2 14 14
13A 12 12
13.6 11 11
13.8 10 10
14.0 9 9
14.3 8 8
14.6 7 7
15.0 7 7
15.5 6 6
16.0 5 5
16.5 5 5
17.0 4 4
17.5 4 4
1&0 4 4
19.0 4 4
20.0 3 3
22.0 . 3 3
26.0 0 0
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

TABULAOYDROGRAPH METHOD &ion 2.00
r
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date;
Subtitle: Area B
Total watershed area: 0.047 sq mi Rainfall type: I1 Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
Area B
Area(sq mi) 0.05*
Rainfall(in) 6.4
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 5.69
Tc (hrs) 0.21 *
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOutlet 0.00
Ia/P ' 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)------------
(hr) Flow Area B
11.0
6
6
11.3
8
8
11.6
13
13
11.9
56
56
12.0
107
107
12.1
197
197
12.2
213P
213P
12.3
128
128
12.4 66 66
12.5 44 44
12.6 34 34
12.7 27 27
12.8 23 23
13.0 19 19
13.2 16 16
13.4 14 14
13.6 13 13
13.8 12 12
14.0 11 11
14.3 9 9
14.6 9 9
15.0 8 8
15.5 7 7
16.0 6 6
16.5 6 6
17.0 5 5
17.5 5 5
18.0 5 5
19.0 4 4
20.0 3 3
22.0 3 3
26.0 0 0
P - Peak Flow . * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

STORAGE Vd kVME FOR DETENTION BASINS A Version 2. 00
low
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: ;.Date:
Subtitle: Area 13 ,
Drainage Area: 29.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 213 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 2.5 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 170 cfs
Drainage Area: 29.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: 11
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 213 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 3.84 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 110 cfs
Drainage Area: 29.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: 11
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 213 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 5.18 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 68 cfs
Drainage Area: 29,9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 213 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 6.52 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 42 cfs
Drainage Area: 29.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: I I
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 213 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 7.86 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 21 cfs

RUNOFF Ctdk NUMBER_ COMPUTATION li•'ersion 2. 00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area C
Subarea: Area C
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
--------------------------------------- 7----------------- 7---------------------
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 23.8(94)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 23.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREA: Area C TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 23.8 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRA TION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
Project : Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area C
----------------------------- Subarea #1 -Area. C ---------------- -------------
Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)
---------- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheet 3.7 300 .0333 B 0.124
Shallow Concent'd 1100 .0318 U 0.106
Time of Concentration = 0.23*
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes ---
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense ---
Shallow Concentrated ---
13 Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda ---
Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light
1' Paved
D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense
U Unpaved
E Grass -Range, Short J Range, Natural
* - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABULA&YDROGRAPH METHOD &ion 2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area C
Total watershed area: 0.037 sq mi Rainfall type: lI Frequency: 10 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
Area C
Area(sq mi) 0.04*
Rainfall(in) 5.5
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 4.80
Tc (hrs) 0.23 *
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOutlet 0.00
Ia/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total--------
(hr) Flow AreaC.
11.0
4
4
11.3
6
6
11.6
8
8
11.9
37
37
12.0
72
72
12.1
132
132
12.2
143P
143P
12.3
86
86
12.4 45 45
12.5 30 30
12.6 23 23
12.7 18 18
12.8 15 15
13.0 12 12
13.2 11 11
13.4 10 10 .
13.6 9 9
13.8 8 8
14.0 7 7
14.3 6 6
14.6 6 6
15.0 5 5
15.5 5 5
16.0 4 4
16.5 4 4
17.0 4 4
17.5 3 3
18.0 3 3 .
19.0 3 3
20.0 2 2
22.0 2 2
26.0 0 0
N ifIq&V,2 f 3
Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

TAB ULA&YDROGRAPH METHOD ion 2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: ;Date:
Subtitle: Area C
Total watershed area: O.C37 sq mi Rainfall type: II Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas ------------•-------------
Area C
Area(sq mi) 0.04*
Rainfall(in) 6.4
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 5.69
Tc (hrs) 0.23*
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOudet 0.00
la/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total--------
(hr) Flow Area C
11.0
5
5
11.3
7
7
11.6
10
10
11.9
44
44
12.0
85
85
12.1
156
156
12.2
169P
169P
12.3
102
102
12.4 53 53
12.5 35 35
12.6 27 27
12.7 22 22
12.8 18 18
13.0 15 15
13.2 13 13
13.4 11 11
13.6 10 10
13.8 9 9
14.0 8 8
14.3 7 7
14.6 7 7
15.0 6 6
15.5 6 6
16.0 5 5
16.5 4 4
17.0 4 4
17.5 4 4
18.0 4 4
19.0 3 3
20.0 3 3
22.0 3 3
26.0 0 0
Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)------------
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

STORAGE VdI ME FOR DETENTION BASINS GVersion2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County :Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area C
Drainage Area: 23.8 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches.
Peak Inflow: 169 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.99 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 135 cfs
Drainage Area: 23.8 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 169 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 3.06 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 87 cfs
Drainage Area: 23.8 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 169 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 4.13 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 54 cfs
Drainage Area: 23.8 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 169 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 5,19 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 33 efs
Drainage Area: 23.8 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 169 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 6.26 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 17 cfs

RUNOFF C§E NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven#2 - User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area D
Subarea: Area D
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
--------------- _--- ......_..._...------------- M----._...___.._..........___
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 8.90(94)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 8.9
SUBAREA: Area D TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 8.9 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRA TION AND TRAVEL TIME _Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven#2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date: _
Subtitle: Area D
----------------------- _---- Subarea #I - Area D _________-____-__________
Flow Type 2year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (13) (Nft) code (sq/H) (ft) (flism) (Iv)
----------------------- _---- .._...... _..------ -....... ..._-........ ...._-----
Shoat 37 300 0333 B 0,124
Shallow Concem'd 700 .0314 U 0,068
Time of Concentration — 0. 19'
-- Sheet Flow Surface Codes---
* Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res,) G Grass, Bumauda ---
Surface Codes --
C Cultivated <20 %Res. H Woods, Light
P Paved
D Cultivated> 20 %Res. I Woods, Dense
U Unpaved
E Grass -Range, Short J Range, Natural
" - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABOLAM[YDROGRAPHMETHOD Orion 2.00
Project Brickhaven #2 User: Jay
Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked:
_' Date:
Subtitle: Area D
Total watershed area: 0.014 sq mi Rainfalltype: II
Frequency: 10 years
--------------------------Subareas--------------------------
Area D
Area(sgmi)- 0.01"
Rainfall(in) 55
Curve number94" (,1„L60
Runoff(in) 4.80
Tc(hrs) 0.19" 1Y
�s tj U73,V/fi'?
(Used) 0.20
Timefo0utlet 0.00
la? 0.02
(used) 0.10
Time Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)------------
(hr) Flow Area
11.0 2 2
11.3 2 2
116 3 3
1 L9 14 14
12.0 27 27
12.1 49 49
12.2 53P 53P
123 32 32
12.4
17
17
12.5
11
11
12.6
9
9
127
7
7
12.8
6
6
13.0
5
5
13.2
4
4
13.4
4
4
13.6
3
3
13.8
3
3
14.0
3
3
14.3
2
2
14.6
2
2
150
2
2
15.5
2
2
16.0
2
2
165
1 1
17.0
1 1
17.5
f 1
18.0
1 1
19.0
1 1
20,0
1 1
22.0
1 1
260
0 0
P - Peak Flow " - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

TABU YDR OGRAPHMETHOD _ _ lion 2.00
MW
Project : Brickhaven 42 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area D
Total watershed area: 0.014 sq mi Rainfall type: II Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
Area D
Area(sq mi) 0.01 *
Rainfall(in) 6.4
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 5.69
Tc (hrs) 0.19*
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOutlet 0.00
la/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ---------=--- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)------------
(hr) Flow Area D
11.0 2 2
11.3 2 2
11.6 4 4
11.9 17 17
12.0 32 32
12.1 59 59
122 63P 63P
12.3 38 38
12.4 20 20
12.5 13 13
12.6 10 10
12.7 8 8
12.8 7 7
13.0 6 6
13.2 5 5
13.4 4 4
13.6 4 4
13.8 3 3
14.0 3 3
14.3 3 3
14.6 3 3
15.0 2 2
15.5 2 2
16.0 2 2
16.5 2 2
i 7.0 2 2
17.5 2 2
18.0 1 1
19.0 1 1
20.0 1 1
22.0 1 1
26.0 0 0
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

STORAGE V ME FOR DETENTION BASINS Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area D
Drainage Area: 8.9 Acres , Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 63 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: .743 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 50 cfs
Drainage Area: 8.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 63 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.14 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 33 efs
Drainage Area: 9.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak inflow: 63 efs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.54 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 20 cfs
Drainage Area: 8.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: Il
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 63 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.94 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 12 cfs
Drainage Area: 8.9 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 63 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 2.34 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 6 cfs

"a
(a.
(D
0
0
0
d)
a.
6.
6.
CD
E
6
a)
cn
(a
L-
0
0
Q
cl
.0y.
05
8
Jif
FN
fN
I
H
S.
M
g 9.
rF
I
05
X.
wzl'
R 'A'. -
[iif5y�
�50
fi
m
fiii
.iirr
0fT
x
Mill
nil
tiff
.
"a
If
lz
iff3on,
15
X,
....
.
'g
-z,
m
If
5:6
JifF
No-
�X
05.
i3
'5,5'n
U I
�fY01
FiN
IM
rrfrfS
"I
'r
Rrt
sm,
sYz
65z:
MRS
x
Ok'
Z
r.
x
KXI
"I
tr
:50.
M
0
.40
x
10:
5.
c.X
Mc
X,
M,fltfF
i
Siff
x x
frjNn
IS
If
5y.
Ysn,!, ...
.
5U,
"M
Z,..4
5
=,."4
zo
I�z
rim
M.:
'15
R.,
50
'M
J
R
zz
:��x
01,`i
fit
,
�x
222
C) C) CD
N
(sla) mo,pno )IL'Od
CN
LO
L-1

RUNOFF CI&ENUMBER COMPUTATION Wersion2.00
Project: Brickhaven 42 - User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date'.
Subtitle: Area E
Subarea: Area E
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 14.6(94)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 14,6
SUBAREA: Area E TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 14.6 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
Project : Brickhaven 42 User. Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area E
----------------------------- Subarea 41 - Area E -----------------------.-----
F1owType 2year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft) (Nft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (flJsec) (hr)
--.---------__--__--_--_---_--_-
Sheet 3.7 300 .0500 B 0.105
Shallow Concenfd 600 .0420 U 0 D50
Time of Concentration =0.16*
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes ---
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense - ---
Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Bermuda
--- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated <20 % Res. H Woo is, Light
P Paved
D Cultivated > 20 % Res. IWoods, Dense
UUnpaved
E Grass -Range, Shaft J Range, Natural
* - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABUL*MROGRAPHMBTHOD aion2.00
Project: Edckhaven 42 User: Jay Dale: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Chocked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area E
Total watershed area: 0.023 sq mi Rainfall type: R Frequency: 10 years
Ana
Area(sq mi) 0.024
Rainfall(m) 5.5
Curvenumbe. 94•
Ruaofl(in) 4.80
To (hrs) 0.16'
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOullel 0.00
la/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total---------
(hr) Flow AreaE.
11.0
3
3
11.3
3
3
11.6
5
5
11.9
23
23
120
44
44
12.1
81
81
12.2
98P
89P
12.3
53
53
12A 27 27
12.5 18 18
12.6 14 14
12.7 11 11
12.8 9 9
13.0 8 8
13.2 7 7
13.4 6 6
13.6 5 5
13.9 5 5
14.0 4 4
14.3 4 4
14.6 4 4
15.0 3 3
15.5 3 3
16.0 3 3
16.5 2 2
ITT 2 2
17.5 2 2
18.0 2 2
19.0 2 2
20.0 1 1
22.0 1 1
26.0 00
(j µ, 5*"f Gf P O
ZSUV40 Frt3
Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)
P - Peak Flow • - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

STORAGE Y
ME FOR DETENTION BASINS A Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2
User: Jay Date:.06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC
Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area E
Drainage Area: 14.6 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 104 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
1.22 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 83 cfs
Drainage Area: 14.6 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: 11
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 104 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
1.88 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 53 cfs
Drainage Area: 14.6 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: 11
Runoff. 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 104 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
2.53 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 33 cfs
Drainage Area: 14.6 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 104 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
3.19 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 20 cfs
Drainage Area: 14.6 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: 11
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 104 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
3.84 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 10 cfs

RUNOFF CdIM NUMBER COMPUTATION dhVersion2.0o
Project Brickhaven 42 - User: Say Date:. 06-12-99
County Chatham State: NC Checked. _ Date:
Subtitle: Area F
Subarea: Area F
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres(CN)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 21.1(94)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 21.1
SUBAREA: Area F TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 21.1 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven 42 User: Jay Date 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area F
------- .--------------------- Subarea #1 - Area F-----------------------------
Flow Type 2yen length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sglft) (R) (ft/sec) (fir)
Sheet 3.7 300 .0167 B 0.163
Shallow Consumed 550 .0455 U 0.044
Time of Concentration = 0.21 °
--- Sheet Flaw Surface Codes --
A Smooth Surface F Goes, Dense - --- Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res.) G Gress, Bermuda --- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated <20 %Res. H Woods, Light P Paved
D Cultvated> 20 % Res. 1 Woods, Dense U Unpaved
E Grass -Range, Short J Range, Natural
* - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TA B ULAMIYDR 0 GRA PH METHOD &ion 2. QO
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area F
Total watershed area: 0.033 sq mi Rainfall type: II Frequency: 10 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
Area F
Area(sq mi) 0.03*
Rainfall(in) 5.5
Curve number 94* 1
Runoff(in) 4.80
Tc s 0.21
(Used) 0.20
TimeToOutlet 0.00 '>. �j �. %� f f 3
la/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)------------
(hr) Flow Area F.
11.0
4
4
11.3
5
5
11.6
7
7
11.9
33
33
12.0
64
64
12.1
117
117
12.2
127P
127P
12.3
76
76
12.4 40 40
12.5 26 26
12.6 20 20
12.7 16 16
12.8 14 14
13.0 11 11
13.2 10 10
13.4 9 9
13.6
8
8
13.8
7
7
14.0
6
6
14.3
6
6
14.6
5
5
15.0
5
5
15.5
4
4
16.0
4
4
16.5
3
3
17.0
3
3
17,5
3
3
18.0
3
3
19.0
3
3
20.0
2
2
22.0
2
2
26.0
0
0
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

TABULAkHYDROGRAPHMETHOD *Sion 2.00
Project: Brickhaven ##2 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area F
Total watershed area: 0.033 sq nu Rainfall type: I1 Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
Area F
Area(sq mi) 0.03 *
Rainfall(in) 6.4
Curve number 94*
Runoff(in) 5.69
Tc (hrs) 0.21
(Used) 0.20
TimeToDutlet 0.00
la/P 0.02
(Used) 0.10
Time Total
------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ---
(hr) Flow
Area F
11.0 4
4
11.3 6
6
11.6 9
9
11.9 . 39
39
12.0 76
76
12.1 139
139
12.2 150P 150P
12.3 90
90
12A 47
47
12.5 31
31
12.6 24
24
12.7 19
19
12.8 16
16
13.0 13
13
13.2 11
11
13.4 10
10
13.6 9
9
13.8 8
8
14.0 8
8
14.3 7
7
14.6 6
6
15.0 6
6
15.5 5
5
16.0 5
5
16.5 4
4
17.0 4
4
17.5 4
4
18.0 3
3
19.0 3
3
20.0 2
2
22.0 2
2
26.0 0
0
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

STORAGE K 1 ME FOR DETENTION BASINS JbVersion2.00
Project: Brickhaven 42 User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: Area F
Drainage Area: 2 L I Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 150 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.77 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 120 cfs
Drainage Area: 21.1 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 150 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
2.72 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 77 cfs
Drainage Area: 21.1 Acres
Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 150 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume:
3.66 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 48 cfs
Drainage Area: 21.1 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff: 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 150 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 4.61 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 29 cfs
Drainage Area: 21.1 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 25 years
Rainfall -Type: II
Runoff. 5.7 inches
Peak Inflow: 150 cfs
Detention Basin Storage Volume: 5.55 acre-feet
Peak Outflow: 15 efs

LL
�n
INS
in
y
t'
III
ISO
1111
11111111
mill
IIIIIIIII
lull
I
I
1
11111111
1
milli
A,
E
Ill
im
laillill
11
1
I
I
ill
Ill
R
Mill
11
111
11111111111
11111111110111
111111
I
11
IS
I
Ill
IM
1
11
ME
n
I
IN
I
INN
I
a
Ilion
mill
Ill
I
Ill
11111111111
NO
MINE
1111111
111111111111
C) O C1 O C)
04 (D C4 10
(S13) �'Zno ABOd
W-0)
LO
E

RUNOFF CI&ENUMBER CL'KVUTATION-Version2.00
Project: Brickhaven#2 - User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham Stale: NC Checked:-- Dale:
Subtitle: Area G
Subarea: Area G
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B ., D
Acres (CN)
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - - - 163(94)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 163
SUBAREA Area G TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 163 4:. res WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 94
TIME OF CONCENTRA TION6. 1 A TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
Project: Brickhaven #2 User: Jay Dar c 05-12-99
County : Chatham State: NC Checked: _ Date:
Subtitle: Area G '
------ ___----------- Subarea # 1- Area G —. _ ----- _-__
Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area 1. Y;', Velocity Time
rain (it) (tt/ft) tale (Wft) (R) (R/sec; t-il
_—------------ —___—________.._--___—_
Sheet 3.7 300 .0167 B - 13
Shallow Concent'd 3200 .0141 U 0464
Time of ConceniraGo . - • I
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --
A.Smooth Surface
F Grass, Dense --- Sha&i i ''ancentrated --
B Fallow (No Res.)
G Gress, Burmuda — Sur icy Codes --
C Cultvated < 20 %Res.
Fl C; oods, Light I lived
DCWtivaled>20%Res.
IWooda Dense '.1 hipaved
E Grass -Range, Short
J Range, Natural
• - Generated for use by TABULAR method

TABUG4&YDROCRAPH METHOD Stfon 2.00
Project: Brickhaven k2 I User: Jay Date: 06-12-99
County : Chatham
State: NC Checked: Dale:
Subtitle: Area G
Total watershed area:
0.255 sq mi Rainfall type: B Frequency: 100 years
--___--_-
Subareas
Area G
Area(sq mi) 025s
Rainfall(u) 8.0
Curve number 94•
_ 3
3f) 7 5 01 z �t
Runol(m) 7.28
7�Lg(U3Sbo)lG.3 =
Tc (hrs) 0 63'
(Used) 0,75 -
d vrf DDn
TimeToOutiet 0.00
Ia/P 0.02
"
(Used) 0.10
Time Total ------
Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)-------
(In) Flow Area G
1L0 24 24
11.3 33 33
11.6 45 45
11.9 67 67
12.0 85 85
12.1 126 126
12.2 213 213
.
12.3 360 360
12.4
545
545
12.5
705
705
126
786P
786P
12.7
760
760
12.8
684
684
13.0
467
467
13.2
319
319
13A
228
228
13.6
172
172
13.8
137
137
14.0
113
113
14.3
91
91
14.6
76
76
15.0
65
65
15.5
57
57
16.0
50
50
16.5
45
45
ITT
41
41
17.5
37
37
180
35
35
19.0
32
32
20.0
28
28
22.0
22
22
26.0
0
0
P - Peak Flow • - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

OCHART
2
10000
111
ISO
165
8,000
8.000
EXAMPLE
(rtl
156
6,000
a• 361eeha, P.a fen 1
6.
(3)
51000
0.6611,
3.
6.
I46
0,000
ry6, 6 x91
0 (feel]
5' 6.
13E
3,000
i
IO 1.6
6.
120
2,000
19 2.1 6.5
4.
()1 x.x 6.6
3.
IOB
61e rfast9.
96ar
000
6.
3.
600
U
es
600
500
_
600
2 2.
'I2
l
m
Soo
//
; L5
_W
/
Z
i
J—
LL
200
66�6�
BC.
1.5 1.5
2
60
i
/
/
56
O
/
/
100Or
60/
a
W
Y
48
x
<
i
_
/_
60
Z 1.0
1.0
u
92
50
O
u
36
30 !w
SCALE ENTRANCE
w
3
/ D
TYPE
a
e33
2p
yl x.aa.eu
o .8
.e
/
(2) attired to eebnn
w
,B
V
3D
z
27 /
10
t r.eie.ne9
1
.T
1
Lru
B
T
26
J
/
6 /
5
To an.nb(21 at 13) Project_
�Ixee
21
(Y
0
nwleee.eu3 to Wool; (11
.6
.6
V
ni6m leeunea 111e le eaan
-
3
a e16 a r reverse a.
,6
I6
nlesver d.
/
2
5
S
3
LO
HEADWATER
DEPTH FOR
12
C. M.
PIPE
CULVERTS
WITH
INLET
CONTROL
&I96ea OF PUBLIC r+e.99 Jell . 1964
182

f tip/xa�•�h_,'of 6rr�k c6_reEc/ar_�-��-�rs.�'7`_ '..
-
_wDb<6.1e .na 7`he r/ownSfrva H'7.._S/o/7P bv17 ✓C�
�f : / C/t: v _S�o�jl�._Cp�r-l�J.a� 9/_/o�✓�d.�e .1/PJ�c,�?�--- - -
Anx.�_.
7"kP -Fcfr f7ol o rSf Ase0vle e-
_rf P/.Prvnx ✓IP�._GSx�b oz-P __.'4' y_�[l'K K� :_ PSG Y%.GPV /L-7 __ ...
JCx vet" /LJPc ho.v•tS ,J C4, S(•a•Nv/K
�I: »r �..n as rr=�=. r .r:: +rc:r--:> +s-s .�= •°�.�_=^�

,II
..��.___
Gy =
GCG['/P: V'o/%U F9 d�!/B �O
Jc ✓o Li///-.�
.�2.2 T��PL
,z _

i �'�
..__..___._.-__,I
{'I
-a! ��� ;:

: �.� _ �va�!�u1�C':-��.':�5�'q•:1:i� }� �:.Wh:►�.••�•ha✓P�.•-: �o �ava�.{l�W. h�� c+�lr`
.'Fill . f hrgu5h L hPP C clur•� s AS,s�m� �Nfi++l'ire � W��fl1 �Ooro�/r�SpP I
duy �,y,.',� tz.p•5 17 �[ G+-�i.cLt /•S .v/p%vl�l•rr:'�
y� �h
T =/fr
--O, S4 6
6-0
11 4� J3
LPJ I;
_ Y'3.
'•{:fir'•=� i. ri n� � . Fl. -�. ..iry.�r •1 .t-j�'.� l r .�/. .� -� ,
7' ! �' �-f�. T� �. ��`.-iti An 'f � R,'^."i�-r � �•-yr?i •i/ w y,�- f�_I /_V � . _ l i,;�i � + - .. _ _,.. .. 1
111+�=�}i'..�^ S.�r�r) .�_'�"_!/y�s r•� ti'f �.•'•.;'. ;� }•� ..�..'.^': �'�' -�• i X.cY 1 r . - .._ ... ..._ _.

y
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF.
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIMS ION OF LAN O RESOURCES
�NCDENR
September 24, 1998
3AMES B. HUN?3R. -�==
Mr. Warren Paschal
G°VE""°" -"^1
Cherokee Sanford Group
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
WAYNE NICDEVITT
RE: Permit No. 19-08
'SECRETARY .:�.. ,
.. -.,.._.. , _,eW,:;".
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Chatham County
+^f_„':
Cape Fear River Basin
D CRARLE9 H.GARMERC
P.G., P.E. DIRECT ON R -�
Dear Mr. Paschal:
ANDSTATEG¢CLOKM :E':
- -
This letter is in response to your letter dated May 29, 1998. In
your letter you requested this office to review the information provided
--
on the Photafloc polymer and evaluate if field application at your mine
-
site is acceptable.
_
This office is supportive of your company's decision to try this
method of flocculation on an experimental basis to determine the
feasibility of the flocculent's use. Therefore, Cherokee Sanford Group
is granted temporary approval to move forward with this experiment.
This approval is contingent upon the following: 1) that your company
design its system according to the manufacturer's specifications
(including pond configurations(; 2) that your company provide this
office with updates on any in -field adjustments deemed necessary
during this experiment; 3) that periodic influent/effluent sampling of
.,.,_-._.,_...,....
turbidity/TSS be conducted; and 4) that solids removed from the pond
will be buried on the mine site, with a minimum of four feet of
uncontaminated soil material cover provided.
At
�^'i,q
This temporary approval is valid for a period of two years from
-
the date of this letter. Permanent aporgval may be obtained from this
office once we and the Division of Water Quality have reviewed the
specific design of Your system and the results of this experiment
ANDQUALITYSECTIO119191T33.0574 FAYi9191733.2976
G EOL u SURVEY SECTION 00101 733-2423 FAY 9191]33-0900
P.O.aoa37667.RALEIGH.NORTNGAPOLINn PT611-T68T TELEPHONC,91917333833 FA%19191715-6601
A AN EQUAL OPPCRTUITY,AFFIRMATIVE ACTIaN EMPLOYER -50%RECYCLE-.IO.e Paa,CONSUUEH PAPER

Mr. Pascal
Page Two
Please attach this approval letter to your existing mining permit for
future reference. The expiration date, mine name and permit number on the permit
document shall remain the same as before this modification.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not
supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any
applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 382 acres and the
amount of land you are approved to disturb. is 83.5 acres.
Please advise Ms. Judy Wehner, Assistant State Mining Specialist, at (919)
733-4574 should you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
cc: Mr. John Holley - DLR
Mr. Ken Schuster - DWQ

_ State of North Carolina
Department of Env&n-1ment,
Hedth and Naturarwesources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
August 2, 1996
Mr. John M. Corcoran
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330 -
'RE`1p"1.SMod' fica'£ on7LRequest'af@FFC6r P--or a teZ.NameACLlLzujijjep
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Your recent request to have all of Cherokee Sanford Group's
mining permits modified has been approved. The modification is
to change the corporate name from Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. to
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC. The following permits are now
officially issued to Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC:
19-04
19-06
-
19-14
53-05
53-06
-63-08 - - -
84-03_-
Brickhaven No. 1 Mine
Chatham County Brick and Mile Mine
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Gulf Mine
Colon Mine
Sanford Mine
Moore -county mine
-Stanly -Shale Products Mine
As this is considered a permit modification, please attach a
copy of this letter and the resulting permit document changes to
each permit document currently held by your company.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] ` [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAIL: 733-2876 FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10 % port -consumer paper

Mr. Corcoran
Page Two
Please review the modified permit information and advise
this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Joe Glass, P.E. .•
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
Mr. Bradley Bennett, DWQ, Stormwater Group

D E PARTMENT O F ENV = RONMENT �
HEALTIi AND NATURAL
RESOURCE S
D i V I S 1[ON O F LAND RESOURCE S
LAND QiJAL=TY SECT=ON
P E R M = T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County - Permit-Nb..19--08
for the operation of a
Clay Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: October 5 2005
c

Page 3 of 9
Modifications
October 5, 1995: This permit has been modified to increase the
affected area from 17 acres to 83.5 acres, approve the pit
expansion and the upgrading of the associated sediment and
erosion control measures as, per the Mine Site Map dated August
27, 1995, and allow modification to the spray irrigation system
as approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
August 2, 1996: This permit has been modified to change the
corporate name from Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. to Cherokee
Sanford Group, LLC.
Expiratior�Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until October 5, 2005.
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS_
1.. A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be
accordance with the permitting requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the
site shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission. It shall be
the permittee's responsibility to contact the Water
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management,
to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
C. Proper approvals must be obtained from the Division of
Environmental Management prior to the initiation of any
land disturbing activities in the expansion area as
indicated on the Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995.
2. A. Any mining process producing air contamination
emissions shall be subject to the permitting
requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission.

Page 3A of 9
B. During mining operations, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust
from leaving the permitted area.

State of North Cara
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist October 5, 1995
Mr. R. Wayne Greene
Cherokee Sanford Group
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
RE: Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Greene:
1 • •
® FEE" r444! FR
Your application for renewal and modification of the above
referenced mining permit has been approved. The modification is to
increase the affected area from 17 acres to 83.5 acres, approve the
pit expansion and the upgrading of the associated sediment and erosion
control measures as per the Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995, and
allow modification to the spray irrigation system as approved by the
Division of Environmental Management. A copy of the renewed and
modified permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the renewed and modified permit were based
primarily upon the initial application. Modifications were made as
indicated by the renewal and modification requests and as required to
insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The new expiration
date is October 5, 2005.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it
does not supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with any applicablezoningregulations lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 382 acres
and the amount of land you are allowed to disturb is 83.5 acres.
Please review the renewed and modified permit and advise this
office at [phone] should you have any questions concerning this
matter.
sin rely,
V/
Rrracy7 EV. D/avis, P.E.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/jw
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Ms. Barbara Rote-WRC, W/attachments
Geological Survey Section Land Quclity Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] .(919) 7333836
FAX: [phone] FAX[phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Rdeigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/10%past-coreumar paper

D E PARTMENT O F ENV = RONMENT
H EALTH AND NATURAL
RESOL7RCES
D= V= S 2 ON (DV LAND RESOURCE S
LAND QTJAL = T Y S ECT 2 ON
P E R M = T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74--46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Cherokee Sanford Group
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County - Permit No. 19-08
for the operation of a
--Clay Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: October 5,_20.05

•
•
Page 2 of 9
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, hereinafter.referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception:' If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee,from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator, provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.

u
Page 3 of 9
Modifications
October 5. 1995: This permit has been modified to increase the
affected area from 17 acres to 83.5 acres, approve the pit
expansion and the upgrading of the associated sediment and
erosion control measures as per the Mine Site Map dated August
27, 19.95, and allow modification to the spray irrigation system
as approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until October 5, 2005.
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, at. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations: ,
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be
in accordance with the permitting requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the
site shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission. It shall be
._. .. the permittee's responsibility to contact the Water
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management,
to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
C. Proper approvals must be obtained from the Division of
Environmental Management prior to the initiation of any
land disturbing activities in the expansion area as
indicated on the Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995.
WQ Loco 7.6gq
2. A. Any mining process producing air contamination
emissions shall be subject to the permitting
requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission.
B. During mining operations, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust
from leaving the permitted area.

0
Page 4 of 9
3. A. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway to prevent
sedimentation of that waterway from erosion of the
affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse. A natural buffer as shown on the
Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995 shall be maintained
between the creek and any mining related activity.
B. Any mining activity affecting -waters of the State,
waters of the U. S., or wetlands shall be in accordance
with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management
Commission.
4. A. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited
to diversions, earthen dikes, silt check dams, silt
retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance
and maintained to prevent sediment from discharging
onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake or natural
watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. Drainage from the affected land shall be directed to
sediment basins indicated in the application for a
mining permit and accompanying drawings dated January
29, 1985, August 14, 1985 and August 27, 1995. The
sediment basins shall be properly designed and
constructed to meet or exceed the standard type 2
sediment basin design described in "Guide for Sediment
Control on Construction Sites in Construction", U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
C. The sediment basins shall be initially constructed as
indicated in the mining permit application and
accompanied drawings and enlarged as the affected areas
are expanded. The basins shall be dipped out when they
become one-half filled with sediment.
D. As areas are cleared, diversion berms shall be
constructed to divert water to sediment basins as
indicated on the Mine Site Map dated August 27, 1995.
E. Whenever possible, drainage from the affected areas
around the mine excavation shall be diverted internal
to said excavation.
5. All mining permit boundaries (382 acres) shall be
permanently marked at the site on 100 foot intervals unless
the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals.

•
Page 5 of 9
6. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater
than the angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or
other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated
channels, the erosion of which may cause off -site damage
because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided
with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such erosion.
7. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent
collection of pools of water that are, or likely to become,
noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage
ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.
8. .Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be
maintained between the mine and public thoroughfares
whenever practical to screen the operation from the public.
9. Sufficient buffer (minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be
maintained between any excavation and any mining permit
boundary or right-of-way to prevent caving of adjacent
property.
10. A physical barrier consisting of a fence or earthen berm,
etc., shall be maintained around the perimeter of any
highwall.
11. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
is generated outside of the mining permit area shall be
allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit area
unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first
been obtained from both the Division of Solid -Waste
Management and the Land Quality Section, Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources. The method
of disposal shall be consistent with the approved
reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous
shall be disposed of within the permitted area.

• e
Page 6 of 9
C. Petroleum contaminated soils shall be handled in
accordance with Permit Nos. WQ0003219, WQ0.007589 and
SR0500046 and any revisions approved or new permits
issued by the Division of Environmental Management.
12. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
13. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the
desire to delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the
mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit
and any approved revisions to it. Approval to implement
such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions.
14. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $500,000.00 blanket bond is sufficient to
cover the operation as indicated in the approved
application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not
exceed the bonded acreage.
15. A. Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives
and History shall be granted access to the site to
determine the presence of significant archaeological
resources.
B. Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 70 Article 3, "The Unmarked
Human Burial and Human Skeletal Remains Protection
Act," should the operator or any person in his employ
encounter human skeletal remains, immediate
notification shall be provided to the county medical
examiner and the chief archaeologist, North Carolina
Division of Archives and History.

Page 7 of 9
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the
performance of which is a condition on the continuing validity of
that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the
terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided --By G.S. 74- 3
I. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel
and other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle
as to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent
with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property
must be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration
which is in accordance with accepted conservation practices
and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or
remain on the mined area that are, likely to become noxious,
odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and
recommended agronomic and reforestation practices as
established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to
the Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities
shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any
event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time
after completion or termination of mining on any segment of
the permit area and shall be completed within two years
after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule,
the planned reclamation shall be to regrade and
satisfactorily revegetate any disturbed areas other than the
mine excavation, which shall be restored to a lake area.

Page 8 of 9
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a
surface suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All sideslopes of any disturbed land area shall be
graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope
with the exception of the lake side slopes.
B. Sideslopes of the lake area shall be graded to a 3
horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter above the water
level and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below
the water level. A minimum water depth of four feet
measured from the low water table elevation must be
maintained.
C. Any settling ponds or sediment basins shall be
backfilled and stabilized unless they are left as
acceptable wetland areas.
D. The processing,,stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
E. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or
otherwise prepared before revegetation.
F. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the
mine site. On -site disposal of waste shall be in
accordance with Operating Condition Nos. 11.A., B., and
C.
G. The affected land shall be graded to prevent -the
collection of noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
After site preparation, all disturbed land areas shall be
revegetated as per the Revegetation Plan approved by Mr. T.
Patrick Shillington, P.E., on August 30, 1995.

Page 9 of 9
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to
the extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be
initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be
completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued to Cherokee Brick Company on August 30,
1985 and transferred to Cherokee Sanford Group on November
4, 1988, is hereby renewed and modified this 5th day of
October, 1995 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

GENERAL DISCUSSION
TO
ie Brlckhaven No. 2 Mine (Permit No. 19-08) In Chatham County,
firth Carolina, contains 382 acres of permitted land.
,proximately 63.5 acres of this land has been disturbed and an
Iditional 20 acres will be disturbed within the next ten years,
addition to the excavation for materials that produce brick,
troleum-contaminated materials and other non -hazardous recyclable
terials are stockpiled at this site and are later blended with
ie mined materials to produce brick,
the active mine area, precipitation collects in this excavation.
Is water Is periodically pumped into a settlement basin where the
Lter drains by gravity. Mining will continue In a northerly
^ection, with these activities always resulting in the
Vclpltation accumulation in the mine excavation. During the
tial stripping of the topsoil as the mine expands t the north,
may be necessary to construct a temporary diversion berm to
sure that the water drains Into the mine excavation. The
rthward expansion of the mine will be In Increments.
free (3) erosion control structures are present along the creek,
d two (2) of the structures are associated with access road
ossings. The three erosion control structures have resulted in
inversion of the creek into wetland conditions and the previous
rgetation is beginning to be replaced with various wettand
iecles. These structures receive runoff from the stockpile areas
c well as wood upland.
fie non -hazardous recyclable materials are stored on pads that have
natively impervious soli liners (coefficient of permeability of
I000001 centimeters per second or slower), The pads are isolated
om the remainder of the mine area by diversion berms. These
rrms prevent discharge of runoff, which is collected in three
ksins. The collected water Is removed by two (2) spray Irrigation
stems, One system follows the haul road and the water Is applied
it dust control, The other irrigation system discharges water to
disturbed woods.
SCALD 1'=400'
1
of 3

FACILITY LAYOUT
CREEK EROSION CONTROL
CROSS-SECTION
(NTS)
UP SLOPE
M111144
DOWN SLOPE
.om Wv W . s
TYPICAL ROADWAY
CROSS-SECTION
(NTS)
SOIL DIVERSI❑N BERM
CROSS-SECTION
(NTS)
PUMP BASIN OUTLET
CROSS-SECTION
(NTS)
CROSS-SECTION
PLAN VIEW
' L Att erosion and sediment control practices shall be checked for
I e e 1 stability and operation following every runoff -producing
raMfalL But in no case less than axe a week. Any necessary
repairs will be made otmediately to maintain nit practices as
designed
GI=11=��_��_11-II=11-11-11=11=11=11=i1=11=11=11-11=�!=11-
t Replace one -foot thick filter section of brick check dam when
dogged with fine sediments.
3 All seeded areas shalt be fertilized, reseeded as necessary,
and mulched according to specification in the vegetative plan.
Sheet NQ
z
u

RECLAMATION CONSIDERATIONS
1. Maintain buffer zone of 50 feet from adjacent permitted
boundaries.
2. All perimeter mine excavation slopes shall be at least 24
(horizontal to vertical) or flatter.
3. Division berms shall be removed.
4. The collection basins of the containment pads for storage of
recyclable materials shall be removed with positive drainage
provided,
5. Roadways and ditches can remain In -place.
6. Remove spray Irrigation systems.
7. Excavate a portion of berm section for Pump Basin and leave
culvert in -place for lake outlet,
8. Leave roadway crossings and erosion control measures in -place at
creek. Spread brick flat at sections upslope of roadway
culverts,
9. Re -vegetate as per recommendations,
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
Seeding Datej January 1 to May 1
August 15 to December 30
RATE
Rye (grain) 120 lbs./acre
10-10-10 Fertilizer 1000 lbs./acre
Lime 2000 lbs./acre
Mulch 4000 lbs,/acre
Seeding Datei May 1 to August 15
JiW3
German Millet 40 lbs./acre
10-10-10 Fertilizer 750 lbs,/acre
Lime 2000 lbs./acre
Mulch 4000 lbs./acre
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
Seeding Date, August 25-Oct.25
Feb. 15-April 15
RATE
,_„N, Common bermudagrass 8 lbs./acre
Sericea lespedeza 50 lbs./acre
10-10-10- Fertilizer 1000 lbs./acre
Lime 400 lbs./acre
Mulch 4000 lbs,/acre
Note 11 Fertilizer and time application rates may deviate from
above if soils are analyzed for optimum rates,
Note 2, Mulch shall be tacked with emulsified asphalt at rate of
14 to 28 gallons/1000 sq, ft, on slopes of 311 (HiV) or
steeper.
Note 31 Use Unscarified Sericea after August 15,
Note, Permanent and Temporary revegetation plan is based on
guidelines In Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and
Design Manual.
DRAWD
FACILITY LAYOUT
of,

DATE TO ASSISTANT "Y"—/OS — DATE TO SUSAN
LOGGED IN
f`
MINING CHE,/C� KL, IST FOR ROUTING I A
Company 1.A�1dlNJ,�O�%.IY,C/71��a''�yl��P�roject Name lM//2VGLJL
Permit No.. Y9-O'/-0 county '( lCtiJAO( , _ Date Received
Reviewer �N/4Y
I
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
PAdditional Information ❑ Fee Needed
❑ Fee Received: Amount
Please route
rn to: ,,// �1
.❑ �K-� Field Office Date Routed 0(
❑ wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑�/Archives and History Date Routed
.0 Other: b :w Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: (Date received +30 days,
noto
not on weekend)
/ �❑Please note the following:
'�!tV &*,4 a ie i 4' AA424,
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Ydllow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan
1

a Q)
Cherokee Sanford,.Brick
Certified Mail #Z014636990
April 6, 1999
Ms. Judy Wehner
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7686
Re: Suspended Solids Treatment
Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Wehner
Cr I
�top a W�
... EC O
AND �tjpt_1(Y�
As you are aware, Cherokee Sanford Brick ("CSB") has been applying Photafloc"" polymer to the
stormwaterthat collectswithintbe miningareafor additional treatment of suspended solids. Pursuant
to our conversation, success with the Photafloc" polymer has been documented by lab analyses.
However, CSB is pursuing application ofanother polymer manufactured by Calgon Corporation that
appearstobesuperiortothecurrempolymer. The polymer is currently utilized in wastewater"well
as drinking water applications. I have enclosed information about the polymer including a Material
Safety Data Sheet for your review.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] should you have any additional questions or
concerns.
Sincerely,
10µ-.-..+.4
Warren Paschal
Director of Environmental Compliance
1600 Colon Road a Sanford, Forth Carolina 27330 a [phone] a 800-277-2700 • Fax [phone]
ww xhcrnkecsanrordxom
Our cowern I' or ihnenvinmmcnr... 10... n¢ms using rnnycied p: rl

CAT -FLOC® DL
Cationic Liquid Polymer
Product Description: CAT -FLOC OL is a medium molecular weight, liquid cationic polyelectrolyte. It is
used as a primary coagulant or coagulant aid in water and wastewater clarification. It is highly effective
as a replacement for, or can be used in conjunction with, inorganic coagulants such as ferric salts or
alum. CAT -FLOC DL is chlorine resistant and effective over a broad pH range. CAT -FLOC DL is
available in plastic pails, steel or plastic drums, recyclable bins, and bulk.
Features:
• Liquid polymer
• NSF lnlemationalcenified
• Unique high charge, medium molecular
weight cationic polymer
• Forms a strong floc
• May reduce or replace inorganic coagulants
Benefits:
• Easy to feed
• Acceptable for use in drinking water
applications
• Effective in a wide range of wastewater and
water clarification applications
Improved finished water quality
Reduce sludge generation
Environmental and Toxicity Data: See product MSDS for complete toxicological and environmental
informall
Regulatory Scotus: CAT -FLOC DL conforms t- requirements of A is �.
Standard 60 -Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals - Health Effects. CAT -FLOC
DL DL is
certified by NSF international as a coagulation and flocculation drinking water treatment
chemical to a maximum feed rate of 57 mgll.
FDA Approved Sections: 176.180 components of paper and paperboard in contact with dry food.
176.170 components of paper and paperboard in contact with
th
aqueous and fatty foods. Typical PropMles (® 25° C)
D.O.T. Class..................................................Not Res
D.O.T. Proper Shipping Name ...................... Not App
Handling and Storage: Improper handling of thi:
can be injurious to workers. Observe all safetypre
shown on the label and In the Material Safety Dal
Keep horn heezll Store CAT -FLOC DL polymer
buildings or heat -traced tanks to prevent freezing.
this product is freeze -thaw stable, stratifi ,m
upon freezing. CAT -FLOC DL po
again upon agitation. R ��y�tyR
Form
liquid
tricted
Iicable
Appearance
viscous. clear, pale
I product
yellow to amber
Callon
a Sheet.
Spacrtic Gravity
1 U4
pH
s-s
in heated
Although
Viscosity of Product, cps
400-900
Freeze Road (F)
32
��Yy OCCUr
ifinifonn
Flash Point ('F)
>200
Bulletin No. 6E24; Rev. 5/98

Feeding: CAT -FLOC DL polymer may be led neat as long as in -
line dilution is provided. However, dilution to 1 % as product is
recommended 10 assure better contact of the coagulant with the
impurities in the water. A Calgon SD, P-18 or MDS feed system
is recommended. Neat polymer feed systems should be capable
of handling 1000 cps viscosity material. A variety of chemical
feed systems are available from Calgon to salisfy your specific
application needs. Please contact your local Calgon
representative or our Chemical Equipment Group for teed
system recommendations.
Dosage Requirements: Product feed rate will be site and
application specific, and may vary as conditions change. Product
demand may be determined by a screening test using Jar Test
procedures.
Materials of Compatibility: CAT -RAC DL polymer is
moderately corrosive to iron and copper, including their alloys.
Storage tanks, chemical feed systems, and piping should be
constructed of high density (HDPE) or crosslinked (XLPE)
polyethylene, fiberglass (FRP) with polyester or vinylester resins,
epoxy -or vinylester-lined steel.
Disposal: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal
regulations. Discarded product, as sold, is not considered a
RCRA haaardous waste.
Viton
x
Neogene
x
Buna-N Rubber
x
Silicone 65
x
FRP tbisphanaf)
x
FRP(isophthalic)
x
Plascite 7122 (epoxy)
x
Plasdte 4100 (vinyl ester) I I X G
The information and recommendations contained in this document are Presented in good faith and believed to be reliable, but shall
not be pan of the terms and omlditions of sale of any Calgon producl. Because many factors affect product application and
performance. each Calgon customer must determine for itself, by conducting appropriate teats or other methods, whether a Calgon
product is suitable for that customers needs. CALGON MAKES NO WRITTEN, ORAL, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY
REGARDING THE CALGCN PRODUCTS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THEIR USE. OR THE
ACCURACY OR USE OF THE INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. CALOON SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Information concerning human and environmental exposure may be reviewed on lie Material Safety Data Sheet for the product. For
additional information regarding incidents involving human and environmental exposure call 1-800-855-00g0 and ask for the Health
add Environmental Affairs Department.
All names in boldface are trademarks or service marm of Calgon Coporation
For more information, contact your local Calgon mpreseMative. "it 1-B00-955-0090,
or write: Calgon Corporation, P.O. Box 1346, Pittsburgh, PA 15230.
Internet address: htlpJAvww.wlgon.com
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES. CREATIVE SOLUTIONS... SINCE 1918
Bulletin No. 6E24; Rev. EM

Cat -Floc DL
ANU
P.O. Box 1346
Pittsburgh, PA 15230-1346
Phone--[phone]
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Section 1. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: Cat -Floc DL
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION: Aqueous solution of cationic homopolymer
PRODUCT CLASS: Water treatment
MSDS CODE: 0666-03-26-96
Section 2. INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Chemical Name
'No ingredients listed in this section`
CAS % by
Number Weight OSHA PEL ACGIH TLV
This product is not considered to be hazardous according to the criteria of the U.S. Federal OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) and is not a controlled product under WHMIS in Canada.
Section 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
********************* EMERGENCY OVERVIEW *******************
This product poses little or no immediate hazard.
PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: None
TARGET ORGANS: None
MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: Unknown
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: This product would not be expected to produce irritation upon contact with the eye.
SKIN CONTACT: The product is not expected to cause skin irritation upon contact. Data indicate that this
product will not produce an allergic skin reaction or be absorbed through the skin in harmful amounts.
INGESTION: This product would be expected to be practically non -toxic by ingestion.
INHALATION: This product is not expected to present an inhalation hazard.
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 1
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Continued on Page 2

Cat -Floc DL
SUBCHRONIC, CHRONIC:
In a subchronic toxicity study using rats, the cationic homopolymer in this product was administered orally at
doses of 5, 50, and 500 mg/kg. Animals in the 50 mgfkg group showed decreased weight gain, decreased food
consumption and increased sleeping time.
Animals in the 500 mg/kg group showed decreased weight gain. decreased food consumption, and alterations in
red blood cells and blood proteins. Animals in the 5 mg/kg group showed no effects. Twelve-month feeding
studies using rats and dogs given 2 and 200 ppm active ingredient in drinking water showed no significant
adverse effects.
A similar product has been shown not to be mutagenic by the Ames assay. A teratology study in rabbits and a
two -generation reproduction study in rats showed this product did not produce birth defects or affect
reproduction.
CARCINOGENICITY:
NTP:
.No ingredients listed in this section'
IARC:
.No ingredients listed in this section'
OSHA:
'No ingredients listed in this section'
Section 4. FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE CONTACT: Not expected to require first aid measures. However, follow good industrial hygiene practices and,
in case of contact, flush eyes with plenty of water.
SKIN CONTACT: Not expected to require first aid measures. However, follow good industrial hygiene practices and,
in case of contact, wash affected skin areas thoroughly with soap and water.
INGESTION: Not an expected route of overexposure. If swallowed, do not induce vomiting. Call a physician. This
product would be expected to be practically non -toxic by ingestion.
INHALATION: Not an expected mule of overexposure.
Section 5. FIRE -FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASH POINT: >200'F
This product is not by definition a "flammable liquid' or a "combustible liquid".
LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: Not available UPPER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: Not available
AUTO -IGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not available
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use extinguishing media appropriate for the surrounding fire.
FIRE -FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Exercise caution when fighting any chemical fire. A self-contained breathing
apparatus and protective clothing are essential.
FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Product emits toxic gases underfire conditions.
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 2
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Continued on Page 3

Cat -Floc OL
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Thermal decomposition or combustion may produce carbon monoxide, carbon
dioxide. hydrogen chloride, ammonia, and/or nitrogen oxides.
NFPA RATINGS: Health= 0 Flammability - 1 Reactivity = 0 Special Hazard = None
Hazard rating scale[ e=Mlnlmal l=Slight 2—Moderate 3Sedoua4S vere
Section 6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
STEPS TO BETAKEN IF MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Wearing appropriate personal protective
equipment, contain spill, collect onto inert absorbent and place into suitable container. Spilled product may
make floor slippery; spills should be cleaned up immediately to prevent falls.
Section 7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: As part of good industrial and personal hygiene and safety procedure, avoid all unnecessary
exposure to the product and ensure prompt removal from eyes, skin and clothing.
Wash thoroughly after handling.
Keep container closed when not in use.
STORAGE: Protect from low temperatures.
Do not store in stainless steel bulk tanks.
Section 8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT:
EYE/FACE PROTECTION: Chemical splash goggles recommended as a good industrial hygiene practice.
SKIN PROTECTION: No special requirement.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: None required.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: No specific recommendations.
UNSATISFACTORY MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION: Carbon steel and copper
Section 9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
BOILING POINT: > 212'F (> 100'C)
VAPOR PRESSURE: Similar to water
VAPOR DENSITY (air=1): Similar to water
%VOLATILE BY WEIGHT: - 82
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96
Issue Date: 10/31/96
SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete
SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 1.02 - 1.04
-pH: 5.0 - 8.0 ® 256C
FREEZING POINT: Not available
Page 3
Continued on Page 4

Cat -Floc DL
APPEARANCE AND ODOR: Slightly viscous, clear, yellow liquid.
Section 10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: No specific information.
INCOMPATIBILITY: Strong acids and bases
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Thermal decomposition or combustion may produce carbon monoxide, carbon
dioxide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, and/or nitrogen oxides.
Section 11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ON PRODUCT:
Product Orel Ll (rat): 25.5 g/kg (35% solution of the polymer)
Product Dermal LDw (rabbB): > 20 g/kg (testing on a 409/a solution of the poymer)
Eye irritation: Dratze score = 8/110 (for 35% solution of the polymer)
Sldn irritation: PSI I = 1.0/8 (for 35% solution of the polymer)
Section 12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ON PRODUCT:
See information on polymer below.
ON INGREDIENTS:
Chemical Name
Poly(dimethyldiallylammonium chloride)-40% solution
Section 13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Aquatic Toxicity Data
96 hr LC50 (bluegill sunfish): 0.82 - 1.3 ppm
96 hr LC50 (rainbow trout): 0.37 ppm
48 hr LC50 (Daphnia magna): 0.9 Ppm (in clear water)
48 hr LCSO (Daphnia magna): L2 - 2.5 ppm (in 50 ppm
clay suspension)
48 hr LC50 (Daphnia magna): 24.8 ppm (in 1000 ppm clay
suspension)
Note a substantial reduction in toxicity is observed under
turbid conditions.
RCRA STATUS: Discarded product, as sold, would not be considered a RCRA Hazardous Waste.
DISPOSAL: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal regulations.
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 4
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Continued on Page 5

Cat -Floc DL
Section 14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT CLASSIFICATION:
Class/Division: Not restricted
Proper Shipping Name: Not applicable
Label: None
Packing Group: Not applicable
ID Number: Not applicable
Section 1S. REGULATORY INFORMATION
OSHA Hazard Communication Status: Nonhazardous
TSCA: The ingredients of this product are listed on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Substances
Inventory.
CERCLA reportable quantity of EPA hazardous substances in product:
Chemical Name Fla
No ingredients of this product have CERCIA reportable quantities.
Product RO: Not applicable (Notify EPA of product spills exceeding this amount.)
SARA TITLE III:
Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances
Chemical Name CAS If g TP_q_
There are no SARA 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances in this product.
Section 311 and 312 Health and Physical Hazards:
Immediate Delayed Fire Pressure Reactivity
[no] [no] [no] [no] [no]
Section 313 Toxic Chemicals:
Chemical Name A # % by Weight
There are no reportable SARA 313 Toxic Chemicals in this product.
FDA: This product is FDA approved under 21 CFR Section(s):
176.170 (Components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty foods)
176.180 (Components of paper and paperboard in contact with dry food)
Consult your Calgon representative for any use limitations.
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 5
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Continued on Page 6

Cat -Floc DL
Section 16. OTHER INFORMATION
HMIS RATINGS: Health =0 Flammability =l Reactivity =0
Personal Protective Equipment = A
Hazard raging scalar 0d lnimal 1=Slighl 2=MOAerate 3=Senous 4Severe
MSDS REVISION SUMMARY: Supersedes MSDS issued on 12/15194. The MSDS has been changed in Section
15.
While chzs information and recommendations get forth herein are believed to be accurate as of the dace hereof. CALBDN
CORPORATION MAKES NO XAPRUNNTY WITH FES= HERETO AND DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FROM RELIANCE THEREON.
PREPARED BY: P.J. Maloney
MSDS Code: 0666-03-26-96 Page 6
Issue Date: 10/31/96 Last Page

i
LI

0
,1 r
A
j
I
II'
i
1 1
I I
I 1
I,
1
1111
I I
I i
i
I
i
I
r
i
I
I
I
I
'
I
1
I
�
I
I

Author: "John I. Holley" <[e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 6/23/98 1:45 PM
Priority: Normal
CC: Judy Wehner at NROLRO12
TO! "Ken Schuster" <[e-mail]> at Internet
Subject: Re: Use of flocculation lags at Cherokee
____ ___ ___________________________ Message Contents -----_
Ken, I understand your concerns and will pass them along to our
central office by copy of this response to you. With respect to your
questions, I have already suggested to our central office that such a
system should be designed per the manufacturer's standards and
specifications (including the pond configurations), and we should
review and approve the specific design before it is implemented in
the field. Such designs should be run by DWQ as well. If you have
further questions, or information applicable to use of this
technology, please let me know. Thanks for your timely response.
> From: "Ken Schuster" <[e-mail]>
> Organization: DENR - Raleigh Regional Office
> To: john [e-mail]
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 09:12:41 EST
> Subject: Use of flocculation logs at Cherokee
> Cc canny [e-mail]
> Priority: normal
> John, ref. the article which I have passed on to Danny I have the
> following comments:
> 1) I would suggest a small pilot to determine the appropriate
> polymer/conc. as the article concerns stone crushing vs. clay
> handling.
> 2) by cc: of this to Danny I'm asking him to check with the tox group
> if there are any concerns there, and I'm not sure if we would have to
> permit it.
> 3) How will the solids that are periodically removed from the pond
> handled? Does the handling allow for a % return to the pond, etc
> 4) Will there be a secondary clean pond below theist?
> 5) I would suggest influent/effluent sampling of turbidity/TSS.
gllylgw
G�Jc�anvn PadcaGlc�Q anacP �j�f a A#ZL

• 0

e
Author: "John L. Holley" <[e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 6/19/9B 12:35 PM
Priority: Formal
CC: Judy Wehner at NROLR01P
TO: ken [e-mail] at Internet
Subject Cherokee -Sanford/ Brickhaven
--------------------------------- Message Contents -------
We have received a proposal from Cherokee -Sanford regarding use of
polymer gel logs to floc the waters from their on -site sediment
control system. I have discussed it with Judy Wehner in our central
office, and have recommended that we accept their trial of this
product subject to DWQ approval. I have also recommended that we
review their design before the new/revised system is installed.
Please review the info I have put in your box and let me know what
you think sometime next week. Thanks

0

DATE TO ASSISTANT• DATE i SUSAN
LAGGED IN
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
/� A
Company 1 .1U AtU JrVkI 1,U' Project Name 'ifr.(.I',i�12/IP.L i lIh a
I
Permit No. County Date Received 014A
r I
Reviewer
v
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
❑ Fee Received: Amount
Please route to:
❑/ /1 A Ltz 16d Field Office Date Routed
i
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other: Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: AS aP (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
ZPlease note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

Cherokee Sanford Group,
Certified Mail #205221114
May 29, 1998
Ms. Judy Wehner
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7686
Re: Suspended Solids Treatment
Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Wehner:
r;
866i fi 0 ►vn r
Cherokee Sanford Group (CSG) has been evaluating alternatives for the additional treatment of suspended
solids as a result of our meeting March 24, 1998. The alternatives will require CSG go above and beyond all
associated permit requirements. However, because of community concern and CSG's regard for the
environment, CSG proposes researching to determine the feasibility and practicality of additional suspended
solids treatment.
Traditional sediment basins may not completely remove suspended solids due to the highly colloidal content
and poor settling characteristics of the stormwater that collects within the mining area. Asa result, CSG has
experimerted with flocculation in removing suspended solids from the stormwater. CSG has conducted jar tests
with various flocculants including calcium sulfate (moulding plaster), alum and Photafloc' polymer.
The field application of the flocculants presents the greatest challenge. The Photafloc' polymer appears to
be the best choice for CSG's application. The polymer is available in gel logs that may be placed directly in
the flow of water and slowly dissolve releasing low concentrations of the flocculant. Please review the
information provided on the polymer and evaluate if field application is acceptable. If you have additional
questions or comments feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wes- p-C
Warren Paschal
Environmental Compliance Manager
cc. Margaret Pollard - Chatham County w/o Attachments
Rod Schutt - CSG
Ken Carden - CSG
John Bums - CSG
1600 Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 * Telephone (9L9) 775-2J21 0 Fax # [phone]

• •
?gICKELSAND DIMES
with Polymer Gel Logs
chelberger
Vice
Terry President
-Opera
Vice Pruident-Operations,
>✓ Allegheny Aggregates and
Jeffrey Williams
Director of Polymer and Chemical Technology,
Neutron Products. Inc.
Coohed stone producers con-
tinue to experience costly
problems with the removal
of fines from stone washing process
discharges. Removal of suspended
solids can be achieved with a variery
of equipment, including filters, cen-
trifuges, anticyclones. However, these
are generally capital and sometimes
maintenance intensive solutions.
Settling Ponds
For crushed stone operations, set-
tling ponds offerthe most cost-effec-
tive means of cleaning water. Most
systems usually comprise a series of
ponds in a closed circuit in which
fines are isolatedand retained prior ttr
the final clean water storage pond.
A pond's effectiveness is a func-
tion of the solid particle settling rate
andthe retention time, determined by
flow rate and pond volume. For ad-
equateclanfication, tberetentiontime
relative to the settling rate must be
suitably long to allow formation of
supernatant, an upper zone of rela-
tively clear water.
Problemsarisewhentbe suspended
particle size is small enough to create
colloidal suspensions with poor set-
tling characteristics; sufficient clar.
ity may be unachievable or require
more area than the producer would
liketo allocateforthis purpose. Large
ponds usually require the use of a
drag line or dredge, which is costly
and time consuming.
Flocculation
Inadequate settling or poor quality
effluent due to small panicle size
may be remedied by employing a
chemical flocculant. Flocculants ag-
glomerate individual particles into
larger, rapidly settling networks or
"flocs."
The advantages of flocculation in-
clude faster settling allowing smaller
pond size, reduced effluent turbidity
for cleaner recycle and environmen-
tally safe discharge, and improved
dredging with dryer solids.
The most effective flocculants are
very high molecular weight, water-
soluble copolymers of acrylamide,
which may be cationic, anionic, or
non-ionic. Polarfor sattract: the long -
chained polymer molecules to sur-
face charges on multiple particles
producing particle -particle bridges.
The optimum flocculant formula-
tion, a complicated function of par-
ticle and liquid properties specific to
each application, is determined by
trial and error testing.
Advantages of the
Photafloc Polymer Gel
Polymer flocculants are typically
supplied as powders, emulsions, or
viscous solutions. Each of these farms
require equipment for dissolution,
mixing, dilution, aging, storage, and
metering of working solutions.
For most quarrying applications,
capital costs when comparedto prod -
act usage are unproportionately high.
In addition, conventional flocculant
use requires frequent monitoring, ad-
justment, and maintenance. These
drawbacks often eliminate flocculants
from consideration, even when their
benefits are significant.
An alternate polymer form that
overcomes these deficiencies is the
Photafloc polymergel. ThePhotafloc
product is a rubber -like concentrated
polymer gel "log" approximately 9
inches in diameter by 20 inches long
and weighing about 40 pounds.
Photafloc logs are placed directly
in the turbulent flow to a settling
pond, where the polymer slowly dis-
solves, providing controlled release
of the flocculant. Flocs begin fo=-
ing directly downstream of the logs
and settling is greatly enhanced.
Advantages of the "log in the
stream" approach include,
No specialized equipment; instal-
lation is most frequently "low -
tech." Good results require only
turbulent contact of water with the
gel. Logs maybe deployed in cul-
verts, under discharge pipes, in
collection boxes anchored with
wire or plastic mesh, or in other
easily fabricated contactors.
Low maintenance; dosage may be
adjusted by varying the number of
logs deployed, log life is typically
weeks to months, and the polymer
dissolution is self-adjusting, re -
Stone Review, December 1991

• NAKELS AND DIMES
sponding to varying flow condi-
tions. Only periodic inspection and
replacement is required
- Fasyprodum selection; easyto per-
form tests maybe conducted to the
field and require no specialized
expertise or equipment.
Case Study
Allegheny Aggregates' quarry in
Short Gap, West Virginia produces
crushed limestone products serving
the bituminous concrete, readymix
concrete, block and road construc-
tion industries. These end uses re-
quire the majority of the products to
be washed, generating up to 10 tons
of washed stone fines per day.
The area available for the separa-
tion of fines from clean water is lim-
ited to approximately 1/3 of an acre.
Rapid build up of fines in this small
volume necessitated frequent clean-
ing of the pond. We needed to de-
velop a method to treat the water,
settle the fines and remove them be-
foretheyroachedtheclean waterpond.
Together with Neutron Products,
the manufacturer of Photafloc, vari-
ous methods for fines removal, in-
cluding the use ofpolymerlogs, were
discussed. On -site tests were con-
ducted to determine the best polymer
for this application, with additional
tests being performed at Neutron's
technical service lab.
The two screw washer discharges
that feed the pond differ markedly:
influent #1, presently travelling
":Polymer - r -Type.°, .
f Of
s..
Now - _,a. ;,..
1123 Anionic,,
±F12311137 Anionic/Catibnic
through a culvert, contains only 2500
mg/l total suspended solids (TSS),
whileinfluent #2, which is hardpiped,
measures 63,500 mg/I TSS with a
significant fraction of very fine clay.
Natural settling rates for the mixed
influent are less than 0.5 Nhr with a
very indistinct interface and highly
turbid supernatant. Untreated dis-
charge from the settling pond con.
tains 400 mg/ml TSS and is notice-
ably cloudly.
Combined treatment of the two
streams is indicated because of the
high solids of influent #2; therefore,
tests were conductedon a 1;1 mixture
of the two feeds. Test results are
summarized in the table above.
Photafloc 1123, an anionic copoly-
mer, was found to be highly effective
in flocculating the limestone fines;
however, the finer clay particles re-
mained in suspension. Someimprove-
ment in clarity and greatly increased
settling rates were noted using the
Pholafloc logs areplaced directly in the mrbuleni flow to a settling pond. The
polymer slowiv dissolves, providing controlled release of theflocculant.
Settling Bates—' Clarity�
f /hn 'TSS, mg/11-
<0 51 400'
210 .w
_25`% z X kn
12,, . o. 70,_ ry,."
1123 in conjunction with the cationic
Phomfloc 1137.
Simultaneous treatment with
Photafloc 1112.5, a non-ionic prod-
uct, helped reduce the suspended clay
and improve clarity, but the best re-
sults were obtained with a sequential
treatment. By settling the limestone
fines with 1123 and then removing
the clay from the supernatant with
1 I12.5, very good water quality was
observed.
Thisselective flocculationapproach
can be achieved with a two -stage
settling pond; the limestone fines, of
some economic value, can be recov-
ered separately from the clay.
The first step was to construct the
settling pond. A 20' wide x 100' long
ditch was excavated with on -site
equipment. The ditch was sloped,
allowing a front end loaderto remove
the settled fines without subjecting
the wheels to the water and fines.
A basket forthe gel logs was fabri-
cated from o I d discarded screen cloth.
As a final clarifying step, a filtration
berry was conshucted ofcrushed stone
and filter cloth. The filter cloth must
be replaced periodically, so plans are
to replace the bean and filter cloth
with a fabricated steel weir. Two step
treatment with 1123 followed by
1112.5 will eliminate the requirement
for filtration.
The new system is a success. Fines
are now removed by a loader, stock-
piledto drain, and hauled away when
it is convenient to the operation. The
system iseffective, economical, needs
little maintenance, and does not re-
quire a large area for treatment. ❑
Stone Review, December 1991

e
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
NEUTRON PRODUCTS INC.
Revised March 31, 1989
I. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
Product game: Photafloc 1132
Chemical Name: Cationic copolymer of acrylamide and a quaternized
comonomer
Chemical Formula: -(CH -CH) --(CH -CH) - CAS NO. 69418-26-4
2 CO x 2 COAIN+(R2R3R4}
NH Cl
Appearance: Photafloc 1132 is a mildly acidic, water soluble, high
molecular weight polymer in the form of a gel log. It varies in color
from water white to slightly yellow and has a mild, slightly sweet odor.
II. HAZARD SPECIFICATIONS
Product Hazard: The polymer gel and its solutions are nonhazardous.
Hazardous Ingredients: The polymer gel contains a small amount of
unreacted acrylamide monomer, CAS 79-06-1, (0.1 - S.3%), which has an
OSHA-PEL (permissible exposure limit) of 0.03 mg/m . The American
Council of Governmental Hygenists recommends a TLY-TWA (threshold value
limit; 8 hour time weighted average) of 0.03 mg/m , A2, skin. This
acrylamide monomer level will not normally be reached when handling the
polymer gel or its solutions. Also present is a small amount of
unreacted cationic comonomer.
NFPA Hazard Rating: Health - 0 minimal
Flammability - 0 minimal
Reactivity - 0 minimal
Special - 0 minimal
III. PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Flammability: The polymer gel and its solutions are nonflammable,
noncombustible, and nonexplosive. No special fire extinguishing methods
are needed.
Stability: The product is stable and compatible with aqueous systems.
It has no hazardous decomposition products. Combustion products are
carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, ammonia, nitrogen oxides, and water.
Spi11age: The spilled product solution and wet gel logs are very
slippery. Use caution to avoid injury when handling. Follow cleanup and
disposal methods listed in Section VI.
Irritation: Overexposure may result in the following:
Eyes: May cause mild eye irritation.
Skin: May cause irritation and dermatitis.
Ingestion: May cause i-ritation of the mouth and throat, nausea, and
vomiting.
nai7Ron PRODUCTS inc

2 of 3 MSDS1132-33189
Emergencv and First Aid ?rocedures:
Eyes: -Flush gently with water for at least 15 minutes. Contact
physician.
Skin: wash with soap and running water. Remove contaminated clothing
and wash befcre reuse.
Ingestion: Drink a large quantity of liquid to dilute the product.
Induce vomiting. Call a physician.
Special Handling_Require-ments: Gloves should be worn when handling gel
logs, polymer solutions, and surfaces contacted by them. Safety glasses
are recommended. Product should be handled in ventilated areas. No
special respiratory protection is required. Skid prevention methods
should be employed in wet areas.
IV. TYPICAL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Boiling Point: >1000C (2120F)
Freezing Point: <-17°C (10F)
Vapor Pressure @ 100C: Not determined
Vapor Density: Not determined
% Volatile (vol): Negligible at 70°F
Water Solubility: Infinite
Specific Gravity: 1.09 - 1.15
PH of 1% Solution: 4-6
Evaporation Rate: Slower than butyl acetate
V. HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION
Medical conditions generals recognized as aggravated by exposure: None
Primary route of entE : If standard industrial hygiene and recommended
procedure are followed, entry of the product or listed ingredients is not
expected.
Product: Photafloc 1132 is not listed as a carcinogen by the NTP, not
regulated by OSHA, and not evaluated by IARC. No human effects are known
for the polymer.
Ingredients: Acrylamide, present as a residual monomer, has been given
an A2 notation "suspected of carcinogenic potential for man," by the
ACGIH. Symptoms reported in humans, due to excessive exposure to
acrylamide monomer, generally thought to be due to skin absorption,
include: fatigue, difficulty climbing stairs, weakness in hands and
feet, tremors, ataxia, loss of deep tendon reflexes, numbness in the
feet, tingling or cold sensations, and increased sensitivity to touch,
all of which occur early. Secondary muscle atrophy, particularly in
hands and feet, and weight loss, occur later. Urinary retention may
occur. Central nervous system effects, which may occur, are abnormal
sleepiness, poor memory, confusion, hallucinations, slurred speech,
neLJ7Ron pRoDUCTs inc

3 of 3 MSDS1132-33189
hyperactive reflexes, abnormal behavior, positive Romberg sign, abnormal
EEG, and changes in visual fields. Recovery can occur, but can take
months to years. Increased sweating and erythema of the hands is
reported as being characteristic; peeling of the skin of the palms has
occurred.
VI. SPILL AND LEAK PROCEDURE`'
Polymer Gel: Avoid getting gel wet, as it becomes slippery and makes
surfaces it contacts slippery. Sweep up or collect gel pieces, using
gloves, and reuse or dispose of in accordance with local, state, and
Federal regulations. The product is not listed in Federal hazardous
waste regulations 40 CFR 261.33, Paragraphs (e) and (f). It does not
exhibit any of the hazardous characteristics listed in 40 CFR 261,
Subpart C.
Polymer Solutions: Contacted surfaces are slippery. Rinse with large
amounts of water until slickness can no longer be detected. If extensive
rinsing is impractical, apply an absorbant material, such as sawdust, and
discard as a solid waste. Areas that remain slick can be treated with
household bleach (aqueous sodium hypochlorite) and washed.
VII. CONTROL MEASURES
Appropriate Hygienic Practices: Avoid breathing mist. Do not allow eye
or skin contact. Wash thoroughly after handling. Remove and wash
contaminated clothing. Avoid contamination of food, beverages, or
smoking materials.
Protective Equipment: Impervious gloves; safety glasses or goggles.
{fork Practices: Keep work areas clean and dry. Surfaces subject to
spills can become slippery.
Handling and_Storagee: Store in a cool, dry, well —ventilated area.
Engineering Controls: Provide adequate ventilation. Install antiskid
devices on steps and potentially slippery areas.
Manufacturer Data
Neutron Products, Inc.
22301 Mt. Ephraim Road
Dickerson, Maryland 20842
Contacts: Joannes C. Tang, Jeffrey D. Williams
Inquiry Telephone Number: 301/349-5001
neVTRon pRODUCTS inc

•
0
Description
PHOTAFLOC 1132
CATIONIC FLOCCULANT
PHOTAFLOC 1132 is a cationic acryiamide polymer made by a unique process that
uses gamma radiation to -produce an extremely high molecular weight, straight
chain polymer in the form of a gel log. This highly cost effective flocculant
also provides the advantage of eliminating the dust associated with powders and
circumventing the environmental disadvantages of emulsions.
Principal Uses
PHOTAFLOC 1132 can be used in a wide variety of solids —liquid seperation
applications in the municipal, industrial, and mineral processing industries.
Major use areas include clarification, thickening, and dewatering.
Typical Properties of Gel Polymer
Approximate Dimensions ...................... 9 in. diameter by 20 in. length
Approximate Weight .................................................. 42 lbs.
Color ........................................ water white to slightly yellow
Odor ................................................... mild, silghtly sweet
Specific Gravity .................................................. 1.02-1.05
Freezing Point ......................................................... C20F
pH1% Solution.......................................................... 4-6
Molecular Weight ................................................ >10 million
Ionic Character..................................................... ationic
Viscosity* 0.5% gel ................................................ 70 cps.
1.0% gel ............................................... 230 cps.
2.0% gel ............................................... 710 cps.
*Brookfield LVT, 30 rpm, spindle # 3, 250C.
Application
Neutron Products offers a variety of applications techniques depending on the
specific needs of the customer. For large customers, specialized equipment is
available to disperse and dissolve the gel in water. This equipment prepares and
delivers polymer solution automatically. Operator attention is needed only to
fill the hopper with logs.
For many treatment applications, gel logs can be suspended directly in the
process stream. The gel will dissolve slowly providing a constant dose of
polymer with no mixing or monitoring needed.
For intermediate scale users, Neutron Products will work with customers to adapt
dissolving methods.
neUTROFI PRODUCTS inc
22301 Ah, Ephraim Road • P. 0. Box 68 • Dickerson, Maryland 20842 USA • 3011249-5001
TWX: 710-•t 28.0542 • F.4X: 3011349-5007

•
0
PHOTAFLOC Polymer Flocculants
PHOTA FLOC
ionic Charge
Application
1110
+
-
Flocculation of clays & silts; gold and copper ore
beneficiation; acid leached uranium thickening.
1112.5
v.sl.
-
1121
low
-
Waste water clarification w/ & w/o inorganic; settling
coal fines; sand and gravel dewatering; phosphate slime
1123
medium
-
thickening and dewatering.
1125
medium
-
"
1126
medium
-
1129C
high
-
Red mud settling and washing.
1129H
high
-
Red mud settling and washing; clarification of uranium
tailings & alkaline leached uranium thickening.
1130
low
+
Retention aids for paper making; dewatering and
thickening of municipal, paper and other waste water
1131
low
+
sludge; paper making drainage aids; filter and flotation
save alls.
1132
low
+
1133
medium
+
1137
high
+
1142
low
-
Sodium carbonate clarification; gold, silver, and other
metal mining and milling applications; clarification of
1143.5
medium
-
acidic process streams.
1144
medium
-
"
1147
high
-
1150
low
+
Paper retention aids; dewatering of paper and other
fibrous wastes.
1152
medium
+
1152.6
medium
+
"
1154
medium
+
1159
high
+
Potable water clarification; removal of colloidal fines;
dewatering. Clarification, thickening and dewatering of
2260
high
+
municipal and industrial waste water streams.
2270
nigh
+
1.
f: �flacs.rnl
neU7Ron PRODUCTS inc
2301 AIt. Ephraim Road - P 0. Box 68 - Dickerson. Af nlbnd 20842 USA
301-349-5001-F-LV-301-.349- 433

•
is
Description
PRITAFLOC 1112.5
NON: 'SIC FLOCCULANT
PHOTAFLOC 1112.5 is a nonionic acry'_amide polymer made by a unique process that
uses gamma radiation to produce an extremely high molecular weight, straight
chain polymer in the form of a gel log. This highly cost effective flocculant
also provides the advantage of eliminating the dust associated with powders and
circumventing the environmental disadvantages of emulsions.
Principal Uses
PHOTAFLOC 1112.5 can be used in a wide variety of solids —liquid seperation
applications in the municipal, industrial, and mineral processing industries.
Major use areas include clarifica_ion, thickening, and dewatering.
Typical Properties of Gel _Polymer
Approximate Dimensions ...................... 9 in. diameter by 20 in. length
Approximate Weight .................................................. 42 lbs.
Color ........................................ water white to slightly yellow
Odor ................................................... mild, silghtly sweet
Specific Gravity .................................................. 1.12-1.15
FreezingPoint......................................................... <2°F
pH1% Solution....................................................... 8.5-10
MolecularWeight ................................................ >10 million
Ionic Character .............................. anionic
Viscosity* 0.5% gel ............................................... 170 cps.
1.0% gel ............................................... 400 cps.
2.0% gel ............................................... 980 cps.
*Brookfield LVT, 30 rpm,-pindle # 3,
Application
Neutron Products offers a variety :f applications techniques depending on the
specific needs of the customer. For large customers, specialized equipment is
available to disperse and dissolve _he gel in water. This equipment prepares
and delivers polymer solution autcmatically. Operator attention is needed only
to fill the hopper with logs.
For many treatment applications, gel logs can be suspended directly in the
process stream. The gel will dissolve slowly providing a constant dose of
polymer with no mixing or monitoring needed.
For intermediate scale users, Neutron Products will work with customers to
adapt dissolving methods.
neUTROn PRODUCTS inc
22301 Alt. Ephraim Road • :'. 0. Box 68 • Dickerson. ,lfarvland 20842 USA
301-3=9-5001 • F.4X.• 301-349-2433

• 0
phoTaFLO.-C
Technical Bulletin 10202 -Aquatic Toxicity of PHOTAFLOC TM Cationic Gel Logs
and Recommended Practice for Log-in-the-StreamTM Applications
All cationic polyacrylamide flocculants are known
to exhibit toxicity to fish through interference with
gill function. The acute toxicities of cationic
PHOTAFLOCTM gel products has been evaluated
by static bio assay. The results, which are sum-
marized below, show a trend towards increased
toxicity with increaesed functionality.
It should be noted that after many years of Log-
in -the -Stream application of these products at a
large number of installations, there have been no
reported negative ecological effects. Neverthe-
less, the test data indicate the need for prudence
and caution when using and evaluating the cat-
ionic gels for Log -in -the -Stream application. This
requirement is particularly important when using
the higher functionality cationic gels designated
1133 and above.
Most Log -in -the -Stream applications require dos-
es of 50 to 500 parts per billion (0.05 to 0.5
mg/1) It is clear that such doses appproach the
toxicity limits of the higher functionality cationic
gels.
Therefore, applying the conservative assumption
that flocculation and settling do not reduce poly-
mer concentration or mitigate toxicity, the use of
PHOTAFLOCTM 1133 or higher is not recommend-
ed for treatment of effluents discharging directly
to fish bearing streams; unless the dilution factor
is sufficient to reduce residual concentrations to
less than 50 ppb (0.05 mg/I).
For example, in clarification of a 250,000 gal/day
settling pond, a single log will yield 100 to 1000
ppb depending on individual conditions. Assum-
ing the upper limit of 1000 ppb, in absence of
specific field data, the use of mid to high cat-
ionic gels is not recommended unless the pond
discharges to a stream with a flow exceeding
5,000,000 gallday. In the majority of cases the
dilution factors will greatly exceed the minimum
requirement. However, where technically practi-
cal a low functionality cationic, anionic, or non-
ionic gel should be substituted. If cationic gels
must be used it is recommended that the dis-
charge body be monitored for any negative ef-
fects.
Product LC o - 96 Hours' 95% Confidence Highest Observed Non-
(mg/1) Limit (mg/1) Toxic Conc. (mg/1)
PHOTAFLOCT}" 1130
>1,000 —
1,000
PHOTAFLOC T74 1132
4.5 3.6 - 5.6
1.0
PHOTAFLOC Ti" 1133
0.76 0.59 - 1.1
0.18
PHOTAFLOC'" 1137
0,75 0.56 - 1.0
0.32
1 Concentration at which 50%
of test specimens wil die within 96 hour; of
exposure under static conditions
For additional information regarding PHOTAFLoc"A gel logs, and for assistance in selecting the right
PHOTAFLOCT"" product for safe and effective treatment is specific applications contact Neutron Products'
PHOTAFLOC- Technical Service Group or your local PHOTAFLOCTm sales representative.
neUiROn PRODUCTS inc
27301 rift. Ephraim Road • :? 0. Box 68 - Dickerron..'vfarvland 20842 USA
301-349.5001 -FAX [phone]

phoTaFLO-C
Technical Bulletin 10102 -
How to Use the PHOTAFLOCT"" Gel Cube Sample Kit
for Log-in-the-StreamTM Product Selection
Neutron Products family of PHOTAFLocn" gel
comprises a complete catalogue of more than
twenty water treatment polymers. The Log-in-
fhe-StreamTM sample kit contains several gel
cube types selected for their potential effective-
ness in your application. The evaluation proce-
dure is simple and no expensive equipment is
required.
We recommend that testing be conducted on -
site, as effluent samples may change over time
or during transport affecting the validity of the
results. Use effluent samples which are repre-
sentative of normal operating conditions. If the
effluent is subject to periodic variation, testing
should be repeated to account for changing
conditions.
Required equipment includes a large container
for collecting effluent, several clear wide mouth
jars or equivalent, and a timer (a watch with a
second hand is okay).
► Fill several jars to the same level; about
half full. Add a gel cube to one jar and
cap. Wait two minutes for the cube to
become wet and swell.
► Shake by holding the jar by the lid and
inverting. Count the number of shakes.
Stop after five shakes and note the floc
size, settling rate, and clarity of the water.
Continue in this manner until clear water
is observed.
► Repeat with cubes of each type of poly-
mer, striving for consistent treatment of all
samples. The best polymers will be the
ones that produce large, fast settling flocs
and Gear water with the fewest number of
shakes.
► When the selection has been narrowed to
two or three products, retest using the wet
cubes from earlier tests, eliminating the
two minute wetting period, and shaking
two jars side -by -side.
► Decant the treated water into clean jars,
leaving the gel cubes behind. Cap the
jar, shake vigorously for ten to fifteen sec-
onds and observe. Some reduction in
floc size is normal, but the successful
product should still produce acceptable
water quality on standing for a few min-
utes.
Difficult to treat effluents may require longer
shaking in order to dissolve sufficient polymer for
adequate flocculation. Water temperature and
quality may affect dissolution rates, and some
fragile flocs may not withstand intense or pro-
longed shaking. Thus some experimentation
may be required to optimize the test procedure
for individual needs.
Best results are sometimes obtained by
segential treatment with two different gel prod-
ucts. This approach will often improve clarity or
strengthen small or fragile flocs. To evaluate
product combinations follow the procedure, then
decant, add the second gel cube and continue.
Help and advice is always available from the
Neutron Products' Technical Assistance Group
or from your PHoTAFt-ocTM sales representative.
neLffROn PRODUCTS inc
22301 :tilt. Ephraim Road - P 0: Box 68 - D¢ckerson..tfaryland 20842 USA
301-349-5001 - FAX: [phone]

• 0
T
phoaFLoc
Technical Bulletin 10302 -
PhotaflocTM' Gel Logs Clarify Water in Retention Ponds
Land fills, construction sites, sand and gravel
plants, crushed stone producers, and a growing
number of other industries are now required
under NPDES to remove suspended solids from
large volumes of water. Whether to recycle pro-
cess water or meet effluent quality requirements
for storm water discharge, retention ponds are
widely used for clarification. Unfortunately, the
natural settling rate of suspended particles is,
commonly, inadequate to provide sufficient clari-
ty, particularly during periods of high-water flow.
Poor settling leads to undesirably large ponds,
loss of production due to poor water quality, or
even regulatory action.
PHOTAFLOCT'd GEL Lora Do THE JOB
Most retention pond clarification requirements
can be satisfied with PHOTAFLOCTMM gel logs, a
controlled release floccuiant system requiring
little or no operator attention, minimal equipment,
and no electrical power. Moreover. the Log -in -
the -Stream approach has the ability to respond
to variation in water flow rates.
The logs, at 9 inches in diameter and 20 inches
in length, are about the same size and shape of
a firewood log. They contain high molecular
weight polymer floccuiant in a stiff gel matrix.
Weighing about 40 pounds apiece, the logs are
easily transported to even the most remote site.
Each log is individually packaged for long shelf -
life.
In use, the PHOTAFLOCTM" gel logs are placed di-
rectly in the sluice or channel entering the reten-
tion pond. As water flows past the logs they
slowly dissolve, releasing low but effective con-
centrations of floccuiant. The polymer binds to
suspended particles forming larger, faster set-
tling agglomerates and improving capture to re-
duce turbidity.
The PHOTAFLOCT"" Lag -in -the -Stream method
eliminates local overdosing attributed to poor
mixing of viscous polymer solutions encountered
with other flocculant forms. This frequently re-
sults in far better utilization of floccuiant and
more cost-effective performance.
POLYMER SELECTION
Neutron Products manufactures more than twen-
ty different polymer formulations in the gel log
foram. While more than one product may work in
a particular application, there is usually one that
will offer optimal efficiency.
In deciding which PHOTAFLOCT"" product to use
for a particular pond, a simple on -site test is rec-
ommended. Field testing is easy and requires
no elaborate equipment. Neutron Products will
provide gel samples and a detailed test proce-
dure on request. Usually, users are able to ob-
tain good test results without assistance; howev-
er, if required, help and advice are only a phone
call away.
naj7Ron PRODUCTS inc
'2301 Mt. C:�hra,m Raaa • :'. O. Box 68 • MCA, son. ;11ar.:nna'?013 ? USA
301-349-5001 • F,4X., 301-349-2433

phalraFLo.c
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
i ninon PRODUCTS, inc
April 14, 1997
1. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
Product Name: Photafloc 1112.5. 1112.5L
Chemical Name: Copolymer of acrylamide and acrylic acid. sodium
salt.
Chemical Formula: -(CHI-CH)I- (CH I-CH)y-
CO C=0
NH- 0 Na'
CAS NO. 38193-60-1
Appearance: arance: Photafloc 1112.5 and 1112.51, are slightly basic. water
soluble, high molecular weight polymers in the form of gel logs. They
vary in color from water white to slightly yellow and has a mild, slightly
sweet odor.
II. HAZARD SPECIFICATIONS
Product Hazard: The polymer gel and its solutions are nonhazardous.
Hazardous Ingredients: The wolymer gel contains a small amount of
unreacted acrylamide monomer. CAS 79-06-1. (0.1 - 0.3%), which has an
OSHA-PEL (permissible exposure limit) of 0.03 mg/mj. The American Council
of Governmental Hygenists recommends a TF-TWA (threshold value limit: 8
hour time weighted average) of 0.03 mg/m . A2, skin. This acrylamide
monomer level will not normally be reached when handling the polymer gel
or its solutions. Also present is a small amount of sodium acrylate.
NFPA Hazard Rating: Health - 0 minimal
Fiammab:ity - 0 minimal
Reactivity - 0 minimal
Special - 0 minimal
neUTRon PRODUCTS inc
22301 Mr. Ephraim Road • 0. Box 68 • Dicke ron.:lfarvland 20342 USA
301-3- 9-; 001 • F. X.- 301-349- 2433

MSDS1112.5-0414597
III. PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Flammability: The polymer zel and its solutions are nonflammable,
noncombustible, and nonexplosive. No special fire extinguishing methods
are needed.
Stability: The product is stable and compatible with aqueous systems. It
has no hazardous decomposition products. Combustion products are carbon
monoxide, carbon dioxide. ammonia, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and
water.
Spillage: The spilled product solution and wet gel logs are very
slippery. Use caution to avoid injury when handling. Follow cleanup and
disposal methods listed in Section V1.
Irritation: Overexposure may result in the following:
Eyes: May cause mild eve irritation.
Skin: May cause irritation and dermatitis.
Ingestion: May cause irritation of the mouth and throat, nausea, and
vomiting.
Emergency and First Aid Procedures:
Eyes: Flush gently with water for at Ieast 15 minutes. Contact
physician.
Skin: Wash with soap and running water. Remove contaminated clothing
and wash before reuse.
Ingestion: Drink a large amount of liquid to dilute the product.
Induce vomiting. Call a physician.
Special Handling Requirements: Gloves should be worn when handling gel
logs, polymer solutions, and surfaces contacted by -them. safety glasses
are recommended. Product should be handled in ventilated areas. No
special respiratory protection is required. Skid prevention methods
should be employed in wet areas.
IV. TYPICAL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Boiling Point: >100°C (212°F)
Freezing Point: <-17"C (1"F)
Vapor Pressure C 10"C: S mm of Hg
Vapor Density: Not determined
Volatile (vol): Negligible at 70'F
Water Solubility: Infinite
Specific Gravity: 1.12 - 1.15
pH of to Solution: 8.5 - 10
Evaporation Rate: Slower than butyl acetate
Page 2 of 4
neUiRon PRODUCTS inc
22301 Aft. Ephraim Road • p 0. Box 63 • Dickrrson..11ar_vLnd 20842 USA
301-349-3001 • F-X: 301-349-2433

0 0
MSDS1112.5-0414597
V. HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION
Medical conditions genera111- recognized as aggravated by exposure: None
Primary ,route of entry: If standard industrial hygiene and recommended
procedure are followed, entry of the product or listed ingredients is not
expected.
Product: Photafloc 1112.5 and 1112.5L are not listed as a carcinogen by
the NTP, not regulated by OSHA. and not evaluated by IARC. No human
effects are known for the polymers.
Ingredients: Acrylamide, present as a residual monomer, has been given an
A2 notation "suspected of carcinogenic potential for man," by the ACGIH.
Symptoms reported in humans, due to excessive exposure to acrylamide
monomer., generally thought to be due to skin absorption, include:
fatigue, difficulty climbing stairs, weakness in hands and feet, tremors,
ataxia, loss of deep tendon reflexes, numbness in the feet, tingling or
cold sensations, and increased sensitivity to touch, all of which occur
early. Secondary muscle atrophy, particularly in hands and feet, and
weight loss, occur Iater. Urinary retention may occur. Central nervous
system effects, which may occur, are abnormal sleepiness, poor memory,
confusion, hallucinations, slurred speech, hyperactive reflexes, abnormal
behavior, positive Romberg sign, abnormal EEG, and changes in visual
fields. Recovery can occur, but can take months to years. Increased
sweating and erythema of the hands is reported as being characteristic;
peeling of the skin of the palms has occurred.
VI. SPILL AND LEAK PROCEDURES
Polymer Gel: Avoid getting Gel wet, as it becomes slippery and makes
surfaces it contacts slip2ry. Sweep up or collect gel pieces, using
gloves, and reuse or dispose of in accordance with local, state, and
Federal regulations. Wet gel may be handled more easily by applying
baking soda (sodium bicharbonate) to the slippery gel surfaces. The
product is not listed in Federal hazardous waste regulations, 40 CFR
261.33, Paragraphs (e) and (f). It does not exhibit any of the hazardous
characteristics listed in 40 CFR 261, Subpart C.
Polymer Solutions: Contacted surfaces are sli erv. Rinse with large
amounts of water until slickness can no longer be detected. If extensive
rinsing is impractical, apple an absorbant material, such as sawdust, and
discard as a solid waste. Areas that remain slick can be treated with
household bleach (aqueous sodium hypochlorite) and washed.
Page 3 of 4
neLj7Ron PRODUCTS inc
22301 :11t. Ephraim Road • ' 0. Box 68 • Dickmon.:lfary�and 20842 USA
301-349-5 001 • F,9X.- 301-349-2433

0
VII. CONTROL MEASURES
MSDS1112.5-0414597
Appropriate Hygienic Practices: Avoid breathing mist. Do not allow eye
or skin contact. Wash thoroughly after handling. Remove and wash
contaminated clothing. avoid contamination of food. beverages, or smoking
materials.
Protective Equipment: Impervious gloves; safety glasses or goggles.
Work Practices: Keep work areas clean and dry. surfaces subject to
spills can become slippery.
Handling and Storage: Store in a cool. dry, well -ventilated area.
Engineering Controls: Provide adequate ventilation. Install antiskid
devices on steps and potentially slippery areas.
XIII. AQUATIC TOXICITY
The aquatic toxicity of Photafloc 1112.5 and 1112.51, has not been
determined. The product is expected to exhibit only low to moderate
aquatic typical of anionic acrylamide copolymers with LC50 several orders
of magnitude greater than effective application concentrations. The LC50
to rainbow trout (Salina galydneri) for a similar product, Photafloc 1121,
was determined as 480 mg/1 based on active polymer.
Manufacturer Data
Neutron Products, Inc.
22301 Mt. Ephraim Road
Dickerson, Maryland 20842
Contacts: Joannes C. Tang, Jeffrey D. Williams
Inquiry- Telephone Number: 301/349-5001
Page 4 of 4
neUTROn PRODUCTS inc
22301 ;qt. Ephraim Roast • I'. 0. Box 68 • Dickmon. :� farviand 20842 USA
301-349-5001 • F.4X: 301-349- 2433

1
n'
t a
,

o a •
`q, 4 Cherokee Sanford Group, UC
Certified Mail #392074499
February 2, 1998
Ms, Judy Weimer
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Permit No. 19-08
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Wehner:
FEB 031998
Bv�
As you are aware, Cherokee Sanford Group (CSG) conducts mining activities at the Brickhaven Mine
No. 2 in compliance with the above referenced mining permit Activities at the site are monitored to
assure continued compliance with all applicable permit requirements and regulations implemented by
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
In compliance with the mining permit CSG pumps water which collects in the active mine into a
sediment basin through a brick filter and eventually off site, CSG would like to discuss with you the
possibility of implementing some alternatives above and beyond our current permit requirements.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] to schedule a date and time to discuss CSG's
proposed alternatives.
Sincerely,
Warren Paschal
Environmental Compliance Manager
cc. Margaret Pollard - Chatham County
Jimmy Collins - Chatham County
John Burns - CSG
Dan Agee - CSG
u17"' 1
l qq Wit
1600 Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 a Telephone [phone] a Fax [phone]

If/
1 /
Author: "Holley, John L." [e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 7/11/96 2:49 PM
Priority: Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: Judy Wehner at NROLROIP
Subject: Cherokee -Sanford Mines Name Change
------------------------------------ Message Contents ---------------
I see no problem with this name change.

DATE TO ASSISTANT DATE 6 SUSAN
LOGGED IN � /
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company Project Name mzylm
�+
Permit No.p,j�.County '•n: frinv "'.1% Date Received iry '`��s
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
Fee Received: Amount
Please route to:
❑i s
� "!":i:: •>' Field Office Date Routed
Y
❑ wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑' Other:-i�:9:.> Ilr,ir6�' !rf<�'.rllibi'iti,L Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: '?J/M6 (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend) r /
Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

0 � 0
Cherokee Sanford Groun,9
June 10, 1996
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Attn: Tracy E. Davis, P.E.
RIDE E
�AII?
Jbt
L4IVI)
LITY S��:
Re: Mining Permits 19-04, 19-08, 19-06, 19-14, 53-05, 53-06, 63-08 and 84-03
Dear Mr. Davis:
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. ("Existing Cherokee") is the permittee under the above
referenced permits (the "Permits"). In connection with a refinancing and restructuring,
Existing Cherokee intends to transfer the operating assets of the business for which the Pen -pits
are h--Id to a new, affiliated entity organ17.ed under the name Cherokee Sanford Group, r LC
("New Cherokee').
Pursuant to an Assignment of Permits effective June 27 , 1996, a copy of which is
enclosed herewith; Existing Cherokee has assigned the Permits to New Cherokee and Ne",
Cherokee has agreed to assume the obligations and duties of Existing Cherokee under the
Permits. New Cherokee will carry on the business operations of Existing Cherokee.
Please take the appropriate steps to -transfer and change the name of the permittee under
the Permits to Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $400.00
to'cover the fees associated with this change.
If you have any questions or if you need any additional information regarding this
matter, please contact the undersigned. Future correspondence relating to the Permits should
be directed to Wayne Green at the address set forth below. Thank you for your assistance.
Yours very truly,
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC.
Vk
'30". - Cm�
John M. Corcoran, Vice President
H:1DOCSUAMSCHEROKEFRICE-GElASG%i 1-LT.
1600 Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 + Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]

'HEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC. 1500 CC&CAN SANFORD, N.C. 27150,9504
• 01 6/07/96 MINING PERMITS
:HECK NUMBER 177577 1 TOTALS
400.001 1 400.0(
DEHNR
JU 2 i996
QUALITY S K.; J t
_ J
44D QUALITY S E
r ECK NUMBER 177577 ! TQTAL5
s
400.00 '�400_f

0
s
E
ASSIGNMENT OF PERMITS
(N.C. Mining Permits)
THIS ASSIGNMENT is made effective as of the 27rhday of June, 1996, by Cherokee
Sanford Group, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (the "Assignor") to Cherokee Sanford
Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business at 1600
Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 (the "Assignee").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on the effective date hereof Assignor has transferred to Assignee certain
assets heretofore used by Assignor in the operation of its business and Assignee intends to
continue such business operations; and
WHEREAS, Assignor has agreed to transfer, assign and convey to Assignee certain
permits held in connection with the aforesaid business operations, as more particularly set forth
on the Schedule of Permits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Permits");
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, Assignor does as of the date hereof transfer, assign and convey to Assignee all of
Assignor's right, title and interest in the Permits.
Assignee does hereby for itself and its successors and assigns accept the assignment set
,forth herein and assume the obligations and duties of Assignor under the Permits.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this Assignment as of
the day and year first above written.
_______CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC.
M.
John M. Corcoran, Vice President
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, LLC
By - 1.,­>6
James E. arrish, President
H:1000SUANilCHEROKF ORICE-GF.SASSiGN-p

Schedule of Permits
Mining Permits
Issued to: Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
Issued State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
1. Brickhaven No. 1 Mine; Chatham County
Permit No. 19-04; Expiration Date: March 30, 2005
2. Brickhaven No. 2 Mine; Chatham County
Permit No. 19-08; Expiration Date: October 2, 2005
3. Chatham County Brick & Tile Mine
Permit No. 19-06; Expiration Date: March 4, 2004
4. Gulf Mine; Chatham County '
Permit No. 19-14; Expiration Date: March 28, 2005
5. Colon Mine; Lee County
Permit No. 53-05; Expiration Date: March 18, 2004
6. Sanford Mine; Lee County
Permit No. 53-06; Expiration Date: September 3, 2003
7. Moore County Mine
Permit No. 63-08; Expiration Date: March 17, 2004
8. Stanly Shale Products Mine (Norwood Pit); Stanly County
Permit No. 84-03; Expiration Date: April 11, 2005
H:5000 SL A M %C H ER O K E L%R I C E-GELSCH E O U LE. N C A

A � •
Cherokee Sanford Group, hic.
June 10, 1996
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Attn: Tracy E. Davis, P.E.
Re: Redland Insurance Company Bond No. 1018402
Amount: $500,000- Date: September 14, 1995
Dear Nvlr. Davis:
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. ("Existing Cherokee''; is the principal under the above
referenced bond (the 'Bond"), whim is held by the State of North Carolina in connec`ion with
certain mining per -knits (the ."Permits") issued to Existing Cherokee. In connection with a
refinanc:ino and rest ructuring,.Existing:Ccrokce intendsto-transfer tht-Porrriits: alon'.1 with
the operating, assets of The business°"far whir-h:the Permits arr held, ko:a new, affiiiated entity
.organized under the name Cherokee Sanford Group,.LLC ("Mew Cherokee").
Pursuant to an Assignment of Bond effective June _27, 1996, a copy of which it;
enclosed herewith, Existing Cherokee has assigned the Bon: to New Cherokee and New
Cherokee has agreed to assume the obligations of Existing Cherokee as principal under the
Bond. New Cherokee will to carry on the business operations of Existing Cherokee in
connection with the Permits. -
If you have any questions or if you need any additional information regarding this
matter, please contact the undersigned. Furure correspondence related to the Permits should
be directed to Wayne Green at the address set forth below. Thank you for your assistance.
Yours very truly,
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC.
pt,y► V11 .
John M. Corcoran, Vice President
H1000SUA WCH ER0KEEIRICE-GEIA5GNB0N D. CI^
1600 Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 9 Telephone [phone] * Fax # [phone]

ASSIGNMENT OF MINING BOND
(North Carolina)
THIS ASSIGNMENT is made effective as of the , 27ttday of June, 1996, by Cherokee
Sanford Group, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (the "Assignor") to Cherokee Sanford
Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business at 1600
Colon Road, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 (the "Assignee").
1JAIIi►YMI.yVIIra
WHEREAS, on the effective date hereof Assignor has transferred to Assignee the assets
heretofore used by Assignor in the operation of certain mines Iocated in the State of North
Carolina; and Assignee has agreed to assume the obligations of Assignor, as principal, under a
Bond given to to the State of North Carolina in connection with the Mining Permits held for the
operation of said mines;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, Assignor does as of the date hereof transfer, assign and convey to Assignee all of
Assignor's right, title and interest in the following Bond Pursuant to the Mining Act of 1971 (the
"Bond"):
Redland Insurance Company Bond No. 101$402
Amount: $500,000; Date: September 14, 1995
Assignee does hereby for itself and its successors and assigns accept the assignment set
'forth herein and assume the obligations and duties of Assignor as principal under the Bond.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this Assignment as of
the day and year first above written.
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC.
John M. Corcoran, Vice President
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, LLC
z"fwBy:
James E. Parrish, President
HADOCSS11AWCH EROKEMRSCE-GRASSIGN. BON

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural 'T oes;)L 24 1996
Division of Land Resources, Land QualAy Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
�1(PFRW ED MNQ
1. MINE NAME ^I'i . 0wna1 2. MINING PERMIT# 14-9
3. OPERATOR ' 1Pt ] C S1b. Qr -�nl i Ti'IC• 4. COl1N �- A^1
5. ADDRESS r �ii O i^' r r 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE , i 7
7. Person(s) contacted at site Ton f-Q\If1Pr 1133r)
6. Was mine operaling at time of iI Spection'? p'4es ❑No 9. Pictures? ❑Yes pNo
10. Date last inspecletl:�/ /�rJ 11. Any mining Since last inspection? @'Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? la -Yes ❑No
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? UYes ❑No
11 no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? [-]Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
N 114
15. Corrective measures needed andlor taken:
16. Other ie_commendations and Comments:. i `i7 el '5fW.1 J
PX/10r"7ii17(1 !�5 n0+ S{nriP tIP U iPr-!wr•rorF-
if➢ r+r UilS �PPr7 117P n5 iPrN iirN
+'„!)VL(
,MVP
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ©1es ❑ No (Explain) ❑Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑Yes ITI'No Proposed dale _/ /
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report. 20. Copy o1 Report sent to,operato�� /9
/ j `J ,, V. J �J ,Q Q� (date)
INSPECTEDBY!: J✓-C.(11,� . -Tf,t Q(/CU i. DATE /13/'r�
Phone No: r
White copy to file Yellow copy ro operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
wst

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural R
Division of land Resources. rand Cualty Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT Aug 0 a IU
Q �1 (PERNnTM NNE) By
1. MINENAME LlY(Cf 1IVe,i7 2. MINING PERMIT
3. OPERATOR IIP Yl7 eC .5-:i(l+0I CJ' buirc' l�t'lX-� r(1Cj4. COUNTY i-1-am
5. ADDRESS) L) LU Orl M +.7�.Ce•i PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE j 4 )
7. Person(s) contacted at site - 733i0 �Lol)p—"I I tii7A Amof
S. Was mine operating at tir;re o, yfspection? Yes ❑No' 9. Pictures? ❑Yes p.No
10. Date last inspecled:�/.�( /�Y 11. Any mining since last inspection? ,01,.-�Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Perm ,+,
it? in 'es QNo
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? es ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in otfsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
N
r
15. Corrective measures needed and/or to en:.HT.CL ?r6 a
Iii.W illlult
> 0Y1r0
air) us F&IIP .
1(,4e
nPrnll
rra t rl cic) —
a �n l
r rrwn
ll,or h'liu vn rNrIEUXl
onolf a un.
16. Other recommendations and comments:
X
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
18. Fallow -up inspection needed? ❑Yes L^1N0 Proposed date_/ ^ pr
19. No. of additional pages of Ins/pe1ction��Reprt. npo20. Copy of Report sent to.operator �` I /-IJ
INSPECTED EY,7 C.[YL I.Q �JfUWtJ�i '� / I� /, ,.(date)
DATE
Phone No: (�
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Speciaiisf
9191
��S

North Carolina Department of Environment, Hearth, and Natural Resources,' `_"� "
Division of land Resources, Land Quality Section IR .II IN 913 Q
MINE INSPECTION REPORT 'I�. uBuy(PERMITTED MNE)
1MINENAME 2. MINING PERMIT# l —03
YK'OP. .`Cttm94COUNTY(IY�M3. OPERATORIQ( n(Y1
5. ADDRESS )hull R IQ-) Krd•. U;lit/V.fi ' rGC 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE I Z 5
7. Person(s) contacted at srtekiOf rill-? N04Cl101 r27 i'5 J
8. Was mine operating at time ppf inspection? p'Yes ❑ No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes I]N$
10, Dale last 11. Any mining since last inspection? 2'Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? 2�yes ❑No
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? W�es ❑No
It no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oftsrte damage? [!]Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
1
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
fVt?
-w on .51
ff.•
16. Other recommendations and comments:
i
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report a/- map accurate? ©'Yes ❑No (Explain) El Not Reviewed
18. Fallow -up inspection needed? ❑Yes al o Proposed date_/_!_
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report f7 . 20. Copy of Report sent to operator �l -i�
INSPECTEDBY: tX.lhV � ii{�I/I LV�j� DATE/ 13 /Qrl(date)
Phone No: ( QIW ) 51j-'IlUOb
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Ping copy to Mining Specialist
"i

L-gnJ QYGff'Iv- IV,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 4, 1996
Mr. J. Warren Paschal
Cherokee Sanford Group, LLC
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, NC 27330
`' •rs'
Ce
00T
44NDQUa,
Subject General PernhZ^No. NCC5020000
Brickhavcn Mine#v �C7e0ytir
COC NCG020354
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Mr. Paschal:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on July 15, 1996, we are forwarding
herewith the subject ceiti Gcate of coverage to discharge under the subject suite - NPDES general permit. This
permit is issued pursuant 10 the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .I and the
Mcincrandtun of Agreement between North Carolina and (lie US Environnuonal Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling 1equNCrICI6s contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual.permit by submitting an individual permit
application. Unless such demand is mule, this certificate of cove agu shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage isnot transferable except after notice to the Division
of Water Quality. The Division of Writer Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain ether perIll iIS which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management
Act of airy other Federal or Local governmental permit Ihal. muy be requ irecl,
If you have any questions concemiit, this permit, please contact Mr. Sieve Ulmer at telephone number 9191733-
5083, extension 545.
Sincerely,
ORGIVI 800 By
BRADLEY SENNEiT
A, Preston Howaid,.lr., P. 17,,
Raleigh Regional Office
P.O. Box 20535, Raleign, Morn Carolina 2702b-0535 Telephosra 919 (33-5053 FAX v10-?33-07 19
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10%post -consume; paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, I-IEACCH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGO20000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG0203S4
STORMWATER, MINE DEWATERING, AND/OR OVL'RI'LO W FROM
PROCESS WATER RECYCLE SYSTEMS DISCI ARGE.S
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCIhIRGE GLINLINATION SYSFENI
In compliance \rlth the provision of North Carolina Gencral Some 143-21 i.L other lawful standards and
rcgulmions promnlgawd and adopted by the Tniah Carolina Environmental Mamp}cmenl Cominlission, and the
Federal Walcr POIIaIIUII Control Act, as mnended.
CIICK" CU Smifard Gfoup, [TIC
is hereby all lhmized to operam orconrinuo operaloll of a Ircannem system for mine dewaw1 110" and sal tmvamr front
a facility oculed at
13rickhavet Mine 82
Flntwoods Road
Nloncurc
Chelhzm County,
io receiving Ill cicsignamd Is an mmomed tributary m GallCreck in the CapcFear River ballot
III accordance a III the erlluenl limimtions, mmtitorin, reyuiremenaq and ether conditions It Ranh in fans 1, II, III
and IV erGQtwmJ Permit No, N00020000 as attached.
Thiscertificate or Coyci ngc steal I buceme efre a sa Oc(Dim 4 1996.
'Rhls CeifiGunrc of Corcra,I. Shull minuin In cl!cc( III the duration oRhmOcneml Pettit.
,Signori this day CQ I DIX 1 d. 1996.
OFMNAL SIGNED BY
BRCLEYBENNETf
A. 'ie:Irnt flnword. li.. P.I Di CatVr
ii vi sI o n , d W at cr Q I]:I v
13v All hI'd zv 0R the lIII ei roil nun I al >i as agrn M:m �d ana i sy Ion

) 20 L/. / , : I' J,- , 1— 1 " )
11 o
127
WT.'
680(
t f,ase ------- FEET.
( ---
Disppsal
"43
GO-
614
193
Water
T'n k- -
3942
61� v
M
Z
3941
74
r) �z
lz
Subslation',
3940
9,
12ce
35'
2 73
3939
C,
P:
L
3938
204
Z
91
R7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes. Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
December 1, 1995
Mr. Steve Mason
Cherokee Environmental Group
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
RE: Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Permit No. 19-08
Lee County
Dear Mr. Mason:
Allym
IDEHNFR
This letter is in reference to your telephone conversations
with Judy Wenner on November 21, 1995 and November 29, 1995
regarding the Notice of Violation sent to you by the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM), Ground Water Section On October 17,
1995.
As you are aware, Operating Condition No. 11.C. of Cherokee
Sanford Group's mining permit requires compliance with DEM permits
regarding the handling of petroleum contaminated soils at the mine
site. You have assured this office that you are diligently working
to resolve the violations cited by DEM and have submitted an
extension request to DEM. Therefore, this office will not issue a
Notice of Violation for violations of your company's mining permit
at this time.
We appreciate your cooperation in this matter and request that
you notify this office when you have resolved this issue.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Ms. Judy Wehner
Geological Savoy Section
Land Quality Section
Geodetic Survey Section
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]a33 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Sim, recycled/ In past-cantumer paper

f
p r� err n�P r....- .
I

-
ii
I
111
11�
._
11
__ _
III
I�
-
�.
III
it
�
-
i;
-
li
it
III
I�
If
11

�'cam-al
�
Arud 'lfkF i� wa�l,oua
@!krf OHY/ �oa/ry� f� �L�'..J,O�cAnrlG�✓ ✓+eo n1
kCf
�Ja_d�fau✓rfu .d6kbnr� ""
��s�
Ili
IV
IG
_
II
�I
III
III
.III
----
III
i
III
II,
III
III
II!
III

�1
�1I
-.

a MEMO
Cherokee Environmental Group
all,
,., � A Dimion orca.,ox Sanford croup, far
a 1600 Colon Road • Sanford, North Carolina 27330 w [phone] • (800) 774-5 0
❑ 702 Oberlin Road, Suite 150 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 • (919) 743-255 • Fax (9l9) 743-2552 AB
❑ 7100 Muirkirk Road • Beltsville, Maryland 20705 • [phone] • F OlZ498-6104
DATE: i CC: o 6 AUN
W'qjr P.�l 4�}\�rj SS��
TO: F/kc JaZ� W evnet
FROM: S}eV e- W\�5 o-�
SUBJECT: k5b0j
�C`0�``
ra..,•�(.�W<y-e.dSec'�a�-
1�4- c-�e ,n �l a�E c...ry �rs�B✓.5 .�J' ,neeL v-, ete N,, Ov a--,
p`ecrzsc
S � E-fiC M�4Sor✓

Cherokee Environmental Group
A Divi3iO4,ACtwrt S3n1aNG=P. Nc.
Certified Mail#Z402454051
November 14, 1995 ES661�89;0;j
Mr. Ken Schuster
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDEM
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Notice of Violation Response; Permit No. SR0500046
Brickhaven #2 Mine (Moncure)
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Cherokee Sanford Group (CSG) would like to thank you for meeting to discuss the Notice of
Violation (NOV) and concerns noted in your October 17, 1995letter. In response to the NO V CSG
has taken the following actions.
CSG acknowledges failure to request an extension of the Permit at least six months prior to its
expiration in compliance with Section VI.9. To comply in the future, CSG has implemented a tickler
file to identify permit expiration dates and reporting requirements as specified in individual permits.
Permit extensions will now be requested at least six months prior to expiration.
In response to the concerns raised in your recent correspondence CSG has taken the following action
or steps.
I CSG maintains water usage records in accordance with Permit No. W00007589. Permit No.
W00007599 allows the use of retention pond water for dust control but does not require
records be maintained for water used for dust control due 10 the relatively small volumes
involved. Permit No. SR0500046 also provides for the use of retention pond water for dust
control and requires that records be maintained for such water usage, Only the previously
issued Permit No. SR0500046 had a requirement for recordkeeping for the activity of dust
control. Thus, two permits issued by the same agency, for the same activity, utilizing the
same source of water, differed in their requirements for that activity. CSG believes that our
Water Quality permit takes precedence over our Soil Remediation permit in matters
concerning surface water and its use and disposal.
1600 Colon Road • Sanford, North Carolina 27330 • [phone]. 800-774-5330 • Fax [phone]
702 Oberlin Road, Suite 150 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
7100 Mnirkirk Road • Beltsville, Maryland 20705 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Our concern for the environment... 0 ...means using recycled paper!

4
Nevertheless, to address your concerns regarding record keeping for water used for dust
control under permit SR0500046, CSG has purchased and will install by December 1 a water
usage meter that will measure the volume used for dust control. CSG will also track the
volume of water applied by truck to maintain total gallons used for dust control separate from
the total volume of water removed from the retention ponds.
2. In your October 17 letter you state that "Permit No. SR0500046 did not provide for the
storage or treatment of any other kind of waste material other than petroleum contaminated
soils". CSG believes that it has been authorized to receive and store materials other than
petroleum contaminated soils and that this issue had been previously resolved. I have outlined
below the sequence of events that established CSG's authorization to accept and store
materials other than petroleum contaminated soils at our Brickhaven 92 Mine (Moncure).
On February 19, 1991 CSG was issued an NOV (Attachment A) by Mr. Arthur Mouberry for
receiving catalyst material because "...that material is not considered soil as described in the
apphcationlpernut for Air Permit No. 4384R5." CSG's air permit used the term "material,"
however, our permit applications referenced "soils." Mr. Mouberry determined that the
catalyst materials were not "soils" and issued CSG the NOV. Included in the above
referenced NOV Mr. Mouberry also stated "...please note that the acceptance and
incorporation of this material violates Permit No. WQ0003219, condition V1.2, in that the
permit application and supporting data referred only to soils...". CSG met with Mr. Arthur
Mouberry and was granted permission to receive the balance of the material, but could not
use the material until the appropriate permit amendments were obtained (Attachment B).
CSG was in the process of a permit modification at this time and wrote a letter to Mr. Arthur
Mouberry dated March 14, 1991 (Attachment C) in an attempt to clear up the NCDEM
interpretation that CSG was only permitted to recycle "soils." The letter stated: "the term
soils may not describe the full range of materials we would like to recycle in our brick
manufacturing process. We would like our permits to authorize the use of any mineral, clay,
silt, sand or soil from which brick can be manufactured."
Subsequently, new air permits were issued to CSG dated June 28, 1991 (Attachment D)
which stated: "The Permittee may incorporate into their brick making material any mineral,
clay, sand, soil or water which is uncontaminated or contaminated..." The new permit
condition clearly addressed the concern for material that was not considered a "soil." As a
result of the issuance of the new air permits, CSG asked for modifications to the non -
discharge permits associated with the storage of such materials. In letters to Mr. John
Seymour and Ms. Gale Johnson dated July 15, 1991 (Attachment E) CSG asked the wording
of the non -discharge permits be changed to match the air permits. CSG's objective was to
be consistent between permits so activities are regulated in a similar manner.
An amendment to the Brickhaven No. 2, Moncure, NC non -discharge permit (WQ0003219)
was issued on November 15, 1991 at paragraph I.6 (Attachment F). The wording of the non -
discharge permit was changed to read exactly as the new air permit. CSG perceived the

changes in the non -discharge permit to be consistent with the air permit, thus allowing storage
of such materials. The NCDEM amended Permit No. WQ0003219 by assigning it a new
number on November 16, 1992 (SR0500046). All permit conditions remained unchanged.
CSG is now in the process of modifying the current Moncure non -discharge permit
(SR0500046) to be consistent with the draft air permit (4384R9). Again, CSG's purpose is
to be consistent between permits so activities are regulated in a similar manner.
Please feel free to call me at [phone] if there are additional comments or questions.
Sinc ly,
tev Mason
Regional Manager

t t�s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVTSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 19, 1991
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Don Grigg
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
NCGS 143-215.108(a) and NCAC
Subchapter 2H .0600
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. ,
Chatham County 19-00009
Dear Mr. Grigg:
Edmond John Maguire
Regional Manager
Title 15A, Chapter 2,
Moncure Plant OCS Stockpile
On January 29, 1991, Mr. Wally Sanford of this office investigated a
complaint of odors from the subject facility. At that time, he discovered
material identified as catalytic fines being received and incorporated into the
OCS stockpile.
As discussed in our meeting of February 8, 1991, that material is not
considered "soil" as described in the application/permit for Air Permit No.
4384115. Therefore, the incorporation of that material is a violation of
stipulation no. 5 of the subject permit and of North Carolina General Statute
(NCGS) 143-215.108.
Also, please note that the acceptance and incorporation of this material
violates Permit No. WQ0003219, condition VI.2, in that the permit application
and supporting data referred only to soils and that the catalytic fines material
was not addressed .
Under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.108,
"Control of sources of air pollution; permits required; (a) After the effective
date applicable to any air quality or emission control standards established
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.108, no person shall do any of the following things
or carry out any of the following activities which contravene or will be likely
to contravene such standards until or unless such person shall have applied
for and shall have received from the Environmental Management Commission a
permit therefor and shall have complied with such conditions, if any, as are
prescribed by such permit:
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 - Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Telephone [phone] - FAX Number [phone]
An Evuai Ormortuniry Affirmative Actinn Fmnfn—,

Mr. Dori Grigg
Page 2
February 19, 1991
(1) establish or operate any air contaminant source;
(2) build, erect, use, or operate any equipment which may result in
the emission of air contaminants or which is likely to cause air
pollution;
(3) alter or change the construction or method of operation of any
equipment or process from which air contaminants are, or may be
emitted;
(4) Enter into an irrevocable contract for the construction and
installation of any air -cleaning device, or allow or cause such
device to be constructed, installed, or operated."
These violations andlor any future violations are subject to the assess-
ment of civil penalties as per the authority of NCGS 143-215.114.
1.
.Your cooperation and concern for the environment are appreciated. if
you have any questions, please contact either Mr. Ken Schuster, Air Quality
Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Wally Sanford, Environmental Chemist 1, at
91.91733-2314.
Sincerely,
Arthur Mouberry, P.E. f/
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
AM:CWSljf
cc: Lee Daniel
Chatham County Health Department
RRO Water Quality Section

State of North Carolina
Department, of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Edmond John Maguire
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 26, 1991
Mr. Don Griggs
Cherokee Sanfcrd Group, Inc.
1600 colon Road
Sanford, NC �7330
Subject: Acceptance of Catalytic Fines
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
Moncure Plant
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Griggs:
In a discussion with Mr. Harold Bynum a question had
been posed concerning the contractual obligation between
Cherokee and Amerada Hess concerning the acceptance of the
remaining catalytic fine material. As we pointed out to you
in our meetinii, the Raleigh Regional Office has no objection
to Cherokee accepting the balance of the material involved
in this initial contract. Our only concerns at this point
is that the material not be processed or intermixed with the
petroleum cons-_aminated stock -pile until the appropriate
permit amendmilimts are obtained. Also as pointed out to you
in our meetinc;, our willingness to allow this material to be
accepted on site does not guarantee that the appropriate
permit amendmEants will be issued. If Cherokee decides to
accept the ba�Lance of this material, it is doing so at their
own risk.
If you have any additional questions on this matter,
please let me know.
Sincerely,
Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
AM:bas
cc: Air Quality
Water Quality
Harold Bynum
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Telephone [phone] • FAX Number [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
March 14, 1991
Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
NCDEHNR
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Mouberry:
I an writing',to clarify the types of materials and contaminants we are
seeking to permit for recycling in our brick manufacturing process.
Currently, Cherokee Sanford Group has four air permit applications under
review by the Division of Environmental Management. These are:
APP011627 Sanford Plant, Lee County
APP011818 Calf Plant, Chatham County
APP011351 Lee County Plant, Lee County
APP011819 Moncure Plant, Chatham County
The cover letter to these permit applications requests the materials
that Cherokee Sanfoi`^d Group be permitted to recycle be as follows:
1. Non -hazardous material containing Class I & II petroleum
hydrocarbons. The fuels which caTprise these classifications are
listed 'in Attachment 1.
2. Non-hazi3rdous material containing hydraulic oils and other
lubrica6 ng oils not classified as a Class II waste motor oil.
This mai:eriai will not exhibit the characteristic of toxicity as
defined1by TCLP standards.
3. Non -hazardous soils contaminated with petroleum distillates not
classified as Class I & II petroleum hydrocarbons. These will
include naphthalene, mineral oils, mineral spirits, and solvent
blends made from petroleum distillates. This material will not
exhibitla flash point (closed cup) below 140 degrees P. This
material will not exhibit the characteristic of toxicity as
defined1by TCLP standards. This material will not be defined as a
hazardoLis substance because it is a RCRA listed waste.
4. Non -hazardous wastewater contaminated with Class i & II petroleum
hydrocarbons.
These permit applications use the term soils and material
interchangeably. However, the term soils may not describe the full range of
materials we would 1like to recycle in our brick manufacturing process. We
would like our air permits to authorize the use of any mineral, clay, silt,
sand, or soil from which brick can be manufactured. Consequently, we request
that our respective 'applications for modification and renewal of the air
permits referenced above be amended to include such "mineral, clay, silt, sand
or soil frcm which brick can be made."
1600 Colon Road.Sanlord, Nortli Carolina 27330 0 Telephone [phone] Fax a [phone]

Cherokee Sanford Group is also seeking clarification of current permit
limitations which state Cherokee Sanford Group may recycle contaminated soil
at a rate of not greater than 15% of raw material input and at an average fuel
concentration of no more that 1200 ppm. We assume that these provisions were
intended to control the quantities of contaminants emitted to the atmosphere.
If any such limitations are to be imposed, we request that they be applied to
the amount of contaminants that go into the kilns relative to anticipated
emissions.
The purpose of the Air Toxic Modeling included in the permit
applications is to ;identify emission rates of air toxic constituents found in
petroleum hydrocarbons which conform to Acceptable Ambient Limits (AAL's)
established by the ;State of North Carolina. This modeling information should
be used to establish emissions criteria for our recycling operation.
Compliance with emissions limitations would be accomplished through an
extensive laboratory testing program which would identify total concentrations
of air toxic constituents contained in the material Cherokee Sanford Group
accepts for recycling. These concentrations can then be applied through mass
balance assumptionslto stack emissions limitations.
Please call m3 at [phone] if you have any further questions.
Furthermore, I wouiII be happy to came to Raleigh to discuss these air permit
applications with yuu.
Sincerely,
.CM606 W.
Donald W. Grigg
Environmental Services
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP, INC.
cc: Wally Sanford (bEHNR)
Ken Schuster (DE +iNR )
Timothy Donnell), (DE MR )

r ,
State of North Carolina
Departniient of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
�512 North Salisbury Street • RaleiL+, North Carolina 27611
lames G. ,Martin, Governor;
--)TVT:ION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Tune 28, 1991
Ar. vunald W. Gri-gg
cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
Post Office Drawer 458
Sanicra, NC 27311-0458
')ear '^r. ;riag:
William W. ('obev, Jr., Secretary
:"UB.;EC:': :fir Permit No. 4384RG
Cherokele Sanford Group, inc.
Moncure,, Chatham County
_n accordance with your completed application received ,tune 27, 1991, we
are forwarding herewith Permit No. 4384R6 to Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.,
Moncure, North Carolina for the construction and operation of air emission
sources or air cleaning devices and appurtenances.
; _f any part:;, requirements, or limitations contained in this Permit are
unacceptable to yi u, you may request modification of your Air Permit pursuant
to General Statu''e 150B-22 through which the Permit may be modified by the
Director. This request must be submitted in writing to the Director and must
identify the specific provisions or issues for which modification is being
souaht. Unless �,,uch a request is made within thirty (30) days following the
receipt of this Permit, this Permit shall become final and binding.
In the alternative, you have the right to request a formal adjudicatory
hearing within tkIiirty (30) days following receipt of this Permit, identifying
the specific issues to be contended. This hearing request must be in the form
of a written petition, conforming to General Statute 150B-23 of the North
Carolina General) Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative
Courts, Post office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless
a request is made for either an informal modification procedure pursuant to
General Statute L50B-22 or a formal adjudicatory hearing pursuant to General
Statute 150B-23, this Air Permit shall be final and binding.
The North Cai rolina General Assembly in 1987 authorized the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission (EMC) to adopt regulations which charge
annual fees for F,sermit administration and compliance monitoring. After public
hearings, the EM{: adopted regulation 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H
.0609 which set the annual fees for Air Permits issued, renewed, revised, or
modified on or after August 1, 1988.
PO. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oripornun v Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Donald W. Grigg
Page 2
June 23, :991
Annual fees are not charged for a farmer whose Permit is for farming
operations, for minor sources who emit less than three tons per year of each
air pollutant, and for sources not expected to operate during the annual bill-
ing period.
The range of annual fees is from $250.00 to $1,375.00, depending on the
source type category. If the Permittee has not received any notices of viola-
tion or non-compliance for the previous calendar year, then the annual fee is
reduced by 25 percent. Within sixty days, you will receive an invoice for
either annual fee payment or certification that no fee is required. If a fee
is required and timely payment is not received, the Division will initiate
steps ~o revoke the Permit.
As a reminder, all new construction of air pollution sources, air
cleaning devices, or modifications to the sources contained in this Permit
must obtain as required a Permit from this Division prior to construction.
Failure to do so is a violation of General Statute 143-215.108 and may subject
the Permittee to civil or criminal penalties contained in General Statute
143-215.114.
This Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until March 31,
1996, is nontransferable to future owners and operators, and shall be subject
to ``:e conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Sincerely,
Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
A4:CWS/jf
cc: Lee Daniel
Jay Zimmerman
Tim Donnelly
Larry Perry
enclosure

NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
A I R P E R M I T N O. 4 3 8 4 R 6
Issue Date: June 26, 1991 Effective Date: June 28, 1991
Expiration Date: March 31, 1996 Replaces permit: 4364R5
To construct and operate air emission source(s) or air cleaning
device(s), and for the discharge of the associated air contaminants into the
atmosnnere. In accordance with the provisions of Article 218 of Chapter 143,
General Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws.
Rules and Regulations,
CHEROKEE SANFORD GROUP. INC.
State Road 1923
Moncure, Chatham County
is hereby authorized to construct and operate air emission sources or air
cleaning devices and appurtenances consisting of:
(a) two (2) mood/natural gas -Fired brick kilns f20.3 million Btu per
hour maximum heat input and 11.3 tons per hour capacity each), and
clay `andiing equipment:
(b) clay crusher, 125 tons per hour (ID No. 1),
(c) dry scalping screen, 125 tons per hour (ID No. 3).
(d) hammermill, 73 tons per hour (ID No. 4),
;e) dry screen, 73 tons per hour (ID No. 5),
(f) hamnermill, 73 tons per hour (ID No. 6),
(g) shuttle conveyor, 73 tons per hour (ID No. 7),
(h) two (2) brick machines rated at 60 tons per hour each, and
a rotary sand drum dryer and associated materials handling equipment:
(i) ceclaimer, 3.45 tons per hour (ID No. 2),
(j) rotary dryer, 3.45 tons per hour (ID No. 8),
(k) screen. 3.45 tons oer hour (ID No. 9),
(1) haemermill, 3.45 tons per hour (TD No. 10),
:,m) mixer, 3.45 tons per hour (ID No. .2), and
woodwaste handling equipment consisting of:
(n( two (2) simple cyclones (89 inches in diameter) installed in
parallel on a rotary woodwaste dryer, and
(o) a simple cyclone (28 inches in diameter) installed on a woodwaste
collection system and hanmermill,

Air Permit No. 4384R6
?age 2
in accordance with the completed application (APP011818) received June 27,
1991, including all plans, specifications, previous applications, and other
supporting data, all o€ which are filed with the Department of Environment,
Heaith, and Natural Resources and are incorporated as part of this Permit.
This Permit is subject to the following specified conditions and
Limitations including any TESTING REPORTING, or MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
1. 4ny air emission sources or control devices authorized above must ba
operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained
herein. The Permittee shall comply with applicable Environmental
Management Commission Regulations, including 15A NCAC 2D .0515, .0521,
.0535, and .1104.
3. EMISSION LIMITATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT - To comply with this
Permit and to avoid applicability of 15A NCAC 2D .0530, Prevention of
Significant Deterioration, as requested by the Permittee, volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from the soil remediation operations
must be Less than 40 tons per year, calculated each month for the
previous twelve (12) months.
Calculations of VOC emissions per day must be made at the end of each
workday. VOC emissions shall be determined by multiplying the total
amount of each type of VOC-containing material consumed during the
-workday by the VOC content of the material. This calculation and the
total amount of VOC emissions must be recorded in a daily emissions Log.
VOC emissions must be calculated each month for the previous twelve (12)
months in determining whether the Permittee has equalled or exceeded 40
tons of VOC emissions per year.
:within thirty (30) days after each calendar year quarter, the Permittee
must submit in writing to the Regional Supervisor, Division of
Environmental Management, the monthly VOC emissions for the previous
twelve (12) months. In addition, the Permittee must make available to
officials of the Division of Environmental Management, upon request,
copies of the daily emissions log. The Permittee must keep each entry in
the daily work log and each monthly record on file for a minimum of three
(3) years.
3. The Permittee shall take all reasonable precautions with any operation,
process, handling, transportation, or storage facilities to prevent
fLgitive particulate emissions from becoming airborne.

Air Permit No. 4384R6
Page 3
4. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, or for
sources applicable to i5A NCAC 2D .0524 or .0525, when particulate,
.risible, odorous, and/or volatile organic compound emissions exceed
Environmental Management Regulations for more than four (4) hours, the
Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management, Raleigh
Region, shall be notified as promptly as possible, but in no case later
than twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the occurrence. Such
notice shall specify the facility name and location, the nature and cause
of the excess emissions, the time when first observed, the expected
duration, and the estimated rate of emissions. This reporting
requirement does not allow the operation of the facility in excess of
Environmental Management Commission Regulations.
5. The Permittee may incorporate into their brickmaking material any
mineral, clay, silt, sand, soil, or water which is uncontaminated or
contaminated with Class I and Class II petroleum hydrocarbons, hydraulic
oils, transmission fluids, Lubricating oils, naphthalene, mineral oils,
and mineral spirits (including Stoddard solvent and varsoi), provided
':hat the combination of contaminants in said material does not cause the
mixture to be classified as a hazardous material under Part 261 of Title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, CERCLA, or any North Carolina or
Federal regulation. No Liquids (except water) or soils intentionally
mixed with Liquid by the generator may be received.
6. The Permittee shall require the following laboratory testing on contami-
nated soils being considered for treatment:
(a) For all RCRA Subtitle I affected underground storage tank (UST)
cleanups involving virgin petroleum products, the generator must
provide the Permittee with:
(1) TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons): Sample preparation by
California Method #5030 for Class I and Class II products
and/or 03550 for Class II products with analysis by GC/FID;
however, for heavier petroleum fraction (i.e., 04 fuel oil and
above) TPH by EPA Method 49071 is also required.
(2) STEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene): Analysis by
SW-846 Method #8020 or #8240.
(3) TOX (total organic halogens): Analysis by SW-8468 Method 9020
or by ASTM Method STP 976.
(4) Lead by SW-846 Method 283.6.
(b) For all material contaminated with non -virgin petroleum products,
the generator must provide the Permittee with the following analy-
sis:
(1) TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons): Sample preparation by
California Method 05030 for Class I and Class 11 products
and/or 93550 for Class II products with analysis by GC/FID;
however, for heavier petroleum fraction (i.e., 94 fuel oil and
above) TPH by EPA Method 49071 is also required.
(2) Volatile organics by SW-846 Method 8240.
(3) Semi -volatile organics by SW-6486 Method 8270.

Air Permit No. 4384R6
Page 4
(4) RCRA metals analysis by TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure) Metals Test for the eight RCRA/heavy metals (EPA
SW-846 Method #1311).
(5) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) by SW-846 by Method 8080.
(c) For all non -regulated UST clean-ups or releases involving virgin
petroleum product contamination, the generator must provide the
Permittee with the following analysis:
(1) TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons): Sample preparation by
California Method 05030 for Class I and Class II products
and/or 43550 for Class II products with analysis by GC/FID;
however, for heavier petroleum fraction (i.e., #4 fuel oil and
above) TPH by EPA Method 49071 is also required.
(2) STEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene): Analysis by
SW-846 Method 48020 or #8240.
(3) TOX (total organic halogens): Analysis by SW-8468 Method 9020
or by ASTM Method STP 976.
(4) RCRA metals analysis by TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure) Metals Test for the eight RCRA/heavy metals (EPA
SW-846 Method 41311).
5) RCRA volatiles by TCLP testing procedures.
-, The Permittee shall perform the following sampling and analyses after
receipt of the contaminated soil Ln accordance with the provisions
established by the current Division of Environmental Management Ground-
water Section "Guidelines for Remediation of Soil Contaminated by
Petroleum". unless modified in this paragraph, and EPA approved methods
on each completed stockpile before it is incorporated with mined clay and
shale and manufactured into bricks. The results of the analyses shall be
reviewed to ensure compliance with all stipulations of this Permit and
any other regulating documents prior to incorporating with the aforemen-
t_oned clay and shale for brick manufacture.
(a) A composite sample must be taken and screened for all North Carolina
Toxic Air Pollutants with the exception of asbestos, formaldehyde,
maleic anhydride, phosgene, phosphine, and toluene-2,4 diisocyanate.
Materials from sites that directly or indirectly use asbestos,
formaldehyde, maleic anhydride, phosgene, phosphine, and toluene-2,4
diisocyanate shall also be analyzed by approved methods for said
contaminant(s).
(b) No less than ten composite samples from each completed stockpile
shall be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, lead, and TPH.
(c) No stockpile shall exceed 25,000 cubic yards.
B. The Permittee shall notify the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environ-
mental Management, Raleigh Regional Office (919/733-2314) in writing of
the generator, origin, and contaminants in each batch of contaminated
soils before such soil is received. Analytical results of toxicity,
metals, and fuel content shall be maintained on site for no less than
three (3) years.
9. Contaminated minerals, clay, silt, sand, soil, or water accepted for
recycling shall not exceed typical background levels for arsenic, barium,
cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium, and silver as found naturally
in native soils and waters.

Air Permit No. 4384R6
Page 5
!0. The Permittee :rust comply with any applicable Federal, State, or Local
requirements governing the handling, disposal, or incineration of
hazardous, solid, or medical ;pastes, including the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) ,administered by the Division of Solid Waste
Management.
11. The issuance of this Permit in no way absolves the Permittee of liability
for any potential civil penalties which may be assessed for violations of
State law which occurred prior to the effective date of this Permit.
12. So as to comply with i5A NCAC 2D .1104, emissions from the entire
facility shall not exceed 50 pounds per year of benzene, 263 pounds per
day of toluene, 151.3 pounds per day of xylene, and 2.2 pounds per year
of benzo(a)pyrene. No other toxic air pollutants shall be discharged.
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
:. REPORTS, TEST DATA, MONITORING DATA, NOTIFICATIONS, AND REQUESTS FOR
RENEWAL shall be submitted to the:
Air Quality Regional Supervisor, Raleigh Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive, Room 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
2. P_ERMIT RENEWAL REQUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least ninety (90) days
prior to the expiration of this Permit, shall request its extension by
letter. The letter should include the Permit number, the appropriate
renewal fee, description of any modifications, and should be sent to the
Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management.
3. ANNUAL FEE PAYMENT - The Permittee must pay the annual administering and
compliance fee or submit a certification for exemption within thirty (30)
days after being billed by the Division. Failure to timely pay the fee
or submit a certification for exemption in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0609(m) will cause the Division to initiate action to revoke the Permit.
4. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION - A new Air Permit shall be obtained by the
Permittee prior to establishing, building, erecting, using, or operating
the emission sources or air cleaning equipment at a site or location not
specified in this Permit.
S. REPORTING REQUIREMENT - Any of the following that would result in
previously unpermitted, new, or increased emissions must be reported to
the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management:
(a) changes in the information submitted in the application regarding
facility emissions,

Air Permit No. 4384R6
Page 6
[b) changes that modify equipment or processes of existing permitted
facilities, or
,c) changes in the quantity or quality of materials processed.
:f appropriate, modifications to the Permit may then be made by the
Division of Environmental Management to reflect any necessary changes in
the Permit conditions. In no case are any new or increased emissions
allowed that will cause violation of the emission limitations specified
herein.
S. This Permit is subject to revocation or modification by this Division
upon a determination that information contained in the application or
presented in support thereof is incorrect, conditions under which this
Permit was granted have changed, or violations of conditions contained in
this Permit have occurred. The facility shall be properly operated and
maintained at all times in a manner that will effect an overall reduction
in air pollution. Unless otherwise specified by this Permit, no air
Emission source may be operated without the concurrent operation of its
associated air cleaning device(s) and appurtenances.
7. This Permit is nontransferable by the Permittee. Future owners and
operators must obtain a new Air Permit from the Division of Environmental
Management.
s. This Permit does not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of
complying with all applicable requirements of any Federal, State, or
Local water quality or Land quality control authority.
�. Reports on the operation and maintenance of the facility shall be
submitted by the Permittee to the Regional Supervisor, Division of
Environmental Management at such intervals and in such form and
detail as may be required by the Division. Information required in
such reports may include, but is not limited to, process weight rates,
firing rates, hours of operation, and preventive maintenance schedules.
10. A violation of any term or condition of this Permit shall subject the
Permittee to enforcement pursuant to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.114, including assessment of civil penalties.
11. Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3 (a)(2), no person
shall refuse entry or access to any authorized representative of the
Division of Environmental Management who requests entry or access for
purposes of inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor
shall any person obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such repre-
sentative while in the process of tarrying out his official duties.
Refusal of entry or access may constitute grounds for Permit revocation
and assessment of civil penalties.

Air Permit No. 4384
Page 7
Parmit issued this the 28th day of Tune, 1991.
14ORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Arthur Mouherry, P.E., Regional Sup isor
Division of Environmental Manageme t
By Authority of the Environmental Management Cotmnission
Air Permit No. 4384RG

Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
July 15, 1991
Gale Johnson
Division of Environmental Mannagement
P.O. Box 27687
512 N. Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Johnson,
As we discussed in our July 12, 1991 meeting Cherokee Sanford has been
issued air permits which allow us to recycle materials containing petroleum
hydrocarbons other than Class I and Class II hydrocarbons. These air permits are
registered with the Division of Environmental Management as follows.
Moncure Plant - Permit #4384R6
Gulf Plant - Permit #369SR9
Lee County Plant - Permit #4712R8
Sanford Plant - Permit #3694R10
It is our objective to coordinate the contents of our air permits and non -
discharge permits such that they regulate our activities in a similar manner.
The key enabling condition of our air permits reads.
Cherokee Sanford Group shall accept only those minerals clays silts
sands or soils which are uncontaminated or contaminated with class
I or class II petroleum hydrocarbons, hydraulic oils, transmission
fluids, lubricating oils, naphthalene, mineral oils, and mineral
spirits (including stoddard solvent and varsol), provided that the
corrmbination of said material does not cause the mixture to be
c i ass i f i ed as a hazardous matey i a l under Part 261 of T i t l e 40 of the
code of Federal regulations, CERCLA, or any North Carolina or
Federal regulation.
We would like condition 5 of section IV, Goundwater Requirements of Non -
discharge permits WQ0003215 (Colon mine), W00003216 (Lee County mine), W00003218
(Chatam Brick and Tile mine) and WQ0003219 (Br ickhaven NO. 2 Moncure mine) to be
consistent with this air permit stipulation.
For ail materials containing contaminants other than Class I and Class II
hydrocarbons Cherokee Sanford would be willing to provide the Groundwater section
with information on the source of the material, type of contamination, quantity
of material, and all analytical data.
1600 Colon Roaid. Sanford. North Carohii:t 27331) * Telehhunr [phone] • Fax # I 19) 774-6634

l��C�w\e.•n� lr
We would also like to modify condition 4 of section IV Groundwater
Requirements which currently reads:
"No discharge shall occur from the retention ponds".
We propose that the modified stipulation read:
"Retention pond water may be either used as process water in the
brick making process or if the hydrocarbon content as determined by
EPA test method 418.1 for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons,
is less than 10 ppm the water may be used for dust control in the
mining area. Otherwise, no discharge shall occur from the retention
pond. "
We have not sought new air permits for our Norwood plant at our Staniy
County mine (WO0003214). This plant is regulated by the Mooresville Regional
Office. In this case, condition 5 of section IV, Groundwater Requirements should
be maintained.
Please call me if you have any questions at [phone].
Sincerely
Donald W. Gri9S
cc: Bob Cheek (NCOEM)

Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
July 15, 1991
Mr. John Seymour
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Seymour,
I am writing to clarify Cherokee Sanford's objectives with respect to the
adjudication of its Non -Discharge permits WQ0003214 (Stanly Mine), WO0003215
(Colon Mine), wQ0003216 (Lee County Mine), WQ0003218 (Chatham Brick and Tile
Mine), and WO0003219 (Brickhaven No. 2 Moncure Mine).
A. For the following non -discharge permits:
W00003215 - Colon Mine, July 11, 1990
W00003216 -- Lee County Mine, July 11,1990
Wg0003218 - Chatam Brick and Tile Mine, July 11, 1990
1. Conditions 7, 8, and 9 of section I, Performance Standards
should be combined into a single condition which reads:
"Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. shall accept only minerals,
clays, silts, sands, or soils which are uncontaminated or
contaminated with Class I and Class 11 petroleum hydrocarbons.
hydraulic oils, transmission fluids, lubricating oils,
naphthalene, mineral oils, and mineral spirits (including
stoddard solvent and varsoI), provided that the combination of
contaminants in said material does not cause the mixture to be
classified as a hazardous material under Part 261 of Title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations, CERC1_A, or any North
Carolina or Federal regulation."
This condition should replace condition 5 of section IV,
Groundwater Requirements.
2. A Condition should be added to Section IV, Groundwater
Requirements which reads:
"Cherokee Sanford Group shall provide the Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section with all
analytical data for those soils containing contaminants other
than Class I and Class 11 Petroleum Hydrocarbons."
3. Condition 5, part a of Section 111, Monitoring and Reporting
Requirements should be deleted.
1600 Colon Rorid, Sanfi7r(l. North CLimhn.1 27330 • Telephone [phone] • Fax 4 1o)lk)) 77-14,h34

4. Condition 4 of Section IV, Groundwater Requirements should be
altered to read:
"Retention pond water may be either used as process water in
the brickmaking process, or if the hydrocarbon content of the
water as determined EPA test method 418.1 for total
recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons is less than 10 ppm, the
water may be used for dust control in the mining area.
otherwise no discharge shall occur from the retention pond."
5. The Groundwater Requirements outlined in the May 17, 1991 memo
from Gale Johnson to Don Safrit should be incorporated into
the permit as written in the memo except where the changes
requested in items 1, 2 and 4 above apply (These would replace
conditions 3 and 4 in the groundwater memo).
6. Conditions 10 and 11 of Section V1, General Conditions should
be deleted as requested in the May 17, 1991 memo from the
Groundwater section.
B. For permit WQ0003219 Brickhaven No.2 Moncure, December 17, 1990
1. Condition 5 of Section IV, Groundwater Requirements should be
changed to read:
"Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc. shall accept only those
minerals, clays, silts, sands, or soils, which are
uncontaminated or contaminated with Class I and Class II
petroleum hydrocarbons, hydraulic oils, transmission fluids,
lubricating oils, naphthalene, mineral oils, and mineral
spirits (including stoddard solvent and varsoI), provided that
the combination of contaminants in said material does not
cause the mixture to be classified as a hazardous material
under Part 261 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
CERCLA, or any North Carolina or Federal regulation." `
This condition should replace condition 5 of Section IV,
Groundwater Requirements.
2. A condition should be added to Section IV, Groundwater
Requirements which reads:
"Cherokee Sanford Group shall provide the Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section with all
analytical data for those soils containing contaminants other
than Class I and Class II Petroleum Hydrocarbons."

3. Condition 4 of Section IV, Groundwater Requirements should be
altered to read:
"Retention pond water may be either used as process water in
-- the brickmaking process, or if the hydrocarbon content of the
water as determined EPA test method 418.1 for total
recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons is less than 10 ppm, the
water may be used for dust control in the mining area.
Otherwise no discharge shall occur from the retention pond."
4. The Groundwater Requirements outlined in the Feb 25, 1991 memo
from Gale Johnson to Don Safrit should be incorporated into
the permit as written in the memo except where the changes
requested in items 1, 2 and 3 above apply.
C. For permit W00003214 Stanly Mine July 11, 1990
1. As spec i f i ed i n the May 17, 1991 memo from Ga 1 e Johnson to Don
Safrit, Conditions 7, 8, and 9 of section I, Performance
Standards should be combined into a single condition which
reads:
"Cherokee Sanford Group Incorporated shall accept only those
materials contaminated with class I and class II petroleum
products."
2. Condition 4 of Section IV, Groundwater Requirements should be
altered to read:
"Retention pond water may be either used as process water in
the brickmaking process, or if the hydrocarbon content of the
water as determined EPA test method 418.1 for total
recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons is less than 10 ppm, the
water may be used for dust control in the mining area.
otherwise no discharge shall occur from the retention pond."
3. The Groundwater RequirEn-ents outlined in the May 17, 1991 memo
from Gale Johnson to Don Safrit should be incorporated into
the permit as written in the memo.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
S ' cer-enl y ,
L�SI
Donald W. Grigg
AF-.S-
cc: Bob Cheek (NCDEM)
Carolyn McCaskill (NCDEM)
Gale Johnson (NCDEM)

.r SUVt y�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environments! Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
November 15, 1991
Mr. John Burns, Director of Engineering
Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Permit No. WQ0003219 Amendment
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
Brickhaven No. 2, Moncure, N.C.
Petroleum Contaminated Soils
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Bums:
In accordance with your application received March 9, 1990, the permit adjudication
requests received August 10, 1990 and July 15, 1991, and the permit amendment request received
September 11, 1991, we are forwarding herewith Permit No. WQ0003219, dated November 15,
1991, to Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated for the construction and operation of the subject
petroleum contaminated soils storage and disposal/remediation system. This permit amendment
consists of modifying several conditions to address the hydraulic conductivity of the cap and base
liner material, base liner thickness of the OCS stockpile and adjace�t pond, placement and storage
time of petroleum contaminated soils in the OCS and blended stockpiles, elimination of permit
conditions that duplicate restrictions in the Cherokee Sanford Group air quality permit, allows the
use of tested retainment pond water for dust control, control of foreign debris and documentation
of the operation as requested in the permit adjudication and amendment requests. Permit condition
III.2a and b has been modified to correct descriptive language.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 1995, and shall be
subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the
monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance problems.
Issuance of this permit hereby voids Permit No. WQ0003219 issued December 17, 1990.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh. North Carolina 27625-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O.Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this
permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John
Seymour at 919/ 733-5083.
Sincerely,
George LjAverett
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office
Patterson Exploration Services
Groundwater Section
Mr. John Holley, RRO
Training and Certification Unit
Facilities Assessment Unit

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
CONTAMINATED SOILS DISPOSAL PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Cherokee Sanford Group , Incorporated
Chatham County
FOR THE
construction and operation of a petroleum contaminated soils storage and remediation/disposal
system consisting of: first the examination of documents and test results; if acceptable the "Offshe
Contaminated Soil" is compacted into a stockpile having a maximum capacity of 25,000 cubic
yards, a ten year storm (168,300 gallon) retention pond, a stormwater runoff diversion swale and
berm surrounding stockpile and pond together, and a 1-foot thick continuous liner (permeability
coef. 1 x 10-6 or slower for the pond and coef. 1 x 10-7 for the stockpile pad) under both
stockpile and retention pond; next contaminated soils will be blended with mined material and
stored on a 1-foot thick base (permeability coef. i x 10-6 or slower) and capped with 1-foot and
5-feet on sides with mined material; as needed blended contaminated soils will be stored in
hoppers or bins and used in the brick making process with no discharge of wastes to the surface
waters, pursuant to the application received March 9, 1990 and the permit amendment request
received September 11, 1991, and permit adjudication requests received August 10, 1990, and
July 15, 1991 and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until Tune 30, 1995, and shall be subject
to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. PERFORMANCLLTANDARDS
1. The Raleigh Regional Office, phone no. 919/ 571-4700 shall be notified at least
twenty-four (24) hours after stockpiling of the contaminated soil so that an
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made
during the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through
Friday, excluding State Holidays.
2. This permit may be rescinded unless the facilities are installed, maintained, and
operated in a manner which will protect the assigned water quality standards of the
surface waters and ground waters.

3. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including
those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or
replacement treatment or disposal facilities.
4. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
5. The following buffers shall be maintained:
a) 100 feet between disposal area and any public or private water supply including
wells
b) 100 feet between disposal area and "SA and SB" classified surface waters
c) 50 feet between disposal area and any stream, lake, river or natural drainageway
d) 50 feet between disposal area and property lines
e) 10 feet between disposal area and surface water interceptor drains or diversions
(upslope)
f) 25 feet between disposal area and surface water interceptor drains or diversions
(downslope) and groundwater drainage systems.
6. Cherokee Sanford Group, incorporated shall accept only minerals, clays, silts,
sands, or soils which are uncontaminated or contaminated with Class I and Class II
petroleum hydrocarbons, hydraulic oils, transmission fluids, lubricating oils,
naphthalene, mineral oils, and mineral spirits (including Stoddard solvent and
varsol), provided that the combination of contaminants in said material does not
cause the mixture to be classified as a hazardous material under Part 261 of Title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations, CERCLA, or any North Carolina or Federal
regulation.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQijJiREMENTS
The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. Cherokee Sanford Group shall conduct this operation in a manner that will prevent,
as much as possible, precipitation events from occurring on uncapped contaminated
soils.
3. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed material into any surface waters.
4. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system
to prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this
facility.
5. No food -chain crops shall be grown on the storage and related mining sites
following the completion of contaminated soil remediation program.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REOUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management
to insure surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable
sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2

2. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Raleigh, Regional Office telephone
no. 9191571-4700 as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occ nce or first knowledge of the occurrence of
any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the stockp a program which results in the acceptance of
significant amounts of wastes w 'ch are abnormal in quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the stockpile pro am including retention ponds resulting in a
discharge of wastes to receiving aters.
c. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility is not in
compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit or the parameters
on which the system was designed.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the
facility incapable of adequate sludge treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting
contaminated soil to the application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report
in letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This
report must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the
problem does not recur.
3. Cherokee Sanford Group shall maintain a record of where soil from a particular
contamination episode is placed on the storage area.
4. Cherokee Sanford Group shall maintain a copy of the soil fuel analysis report for
each contamination episode.
5. Cherokee Sanford Group shall maintain records for the contaminated soil operation
( on a per load basis ) which include, but are not necessarily limited to the
following:
a. date received and weather conditions
b. company or person delivering
c. facility from which soil removed
d. type of contamination (gasoline, diesel fuel, etc.)
e. average fuel concentration (ppm)
f. quantity of soil accepted (tons)
g. date spread and weather conditions
h. date capped and weather conditions
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. Any groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the Division of
Environmental Management shall be provided.
3

2. The retention pond shall have a liner of natural material at least one foot in thickness
at all locations with a hydraulic conductivity of no greater than 1 x 10-6 centimeters
per second when compacted. Following installation and inspection of the retention
pond, and prior to waste disposal operations, verification of the liner's compliance
with hydraulic conductivity and thickness specifications must be provided to the
Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section, by the project
engineer.
3. The OCS stockpile and retention pond shall be surrounded by a swale and berm
combination that will divert runoff from the stockpile to the pond and prevent sheet
water flow from entering the stockpile area.
4. No discharge shall occur from the retention pond.
5. Cherokee Sanford Group shall provide the Division of Environmental Management,
Groundwater Section with all analytical data for those soils containing contaminants
other than Class I and Class II Petroleum Hydrocarbons.
6. No soils contaminated with substances defined as a hazardous substance in Section
101 (14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 shall be incorporated into the brick making
process.
7. The contaminated soil shall be placed within the OCS stockpile upon an
impermeable base consisting of a minimum of one (1) foot of clay having a
hydraulic conductivity no greater than 1 x 10-7 cm/sec.
8. At the end of each day of operation, the upper surface of the OCS stockpile shall be
graded and rolled with construction equipment in such a way as to prevent the
ponding of surface water on the stockpile, to minimize surface water infiltration into
the stockpile material and to promote surface drainage to the retention pond. In the
event the OCS stockpile cannot be graded and rolled at the end of a days operation,
the stockpile must be covered with an impermeable tarp until such time as the upper
surface of the stockpile can be reworked.
9. The petroleum contaminated soils shall be thoroughly mixed with clean brick soil
material and placed within the blended stockpile upon a minimum of one�l) foot of
impermeable clay having a hydraulic conductivity no greater than 1 x 10- cmisec.
10. Contaminated material shall not be placed closer than five (5) feet from the edge of
either the OCS stockpile or the blended stockpile.
11. The blended stockpile shall be capped with a minimum of 6 inches of brick soil
material at the end of each days operation. Upon completion, the blended stockpile
shall be capped with a minimum of 12 inches of brick soil material on the top and 5
feet on the side slopes.
12. The upper surface of both the OCS stockpile and the blended stockpile shall be
graded in such a way as to prevent the ponding of surface water.
13. Following installation and inspection of all liners, and prior to the placement of
petroleum contaminated soils upon these liners, verification of the liner's
compliance with hydraulic conductivity and thickness specifications must be
provided to the Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
4

14. Retention pond water may be either used as process water in the brick making
process, or if the hydrocarbon content of the water as determined by EPA test
methods 624 and 625 or 601, 602 and 610 is less than 10 ppm, the water may be
used for dust control in the mining area. Written permission for use as dust control
must be received from the Division's Raleigh Regional Office. Otherwise, no other
discharge shall occur from the retention pond.
Detailed records of water usage for dust control shall be maintained by the Permittee
for a period of three years from the date of the water application and shall be made
available upon request to the Division of Environmental Management or other
permitting authority. These records shall include but not be limited to:
a) sampling test results for each water use event
b) amount of water used in each event
c) written authorization from the Division's Regional Office
(an event shall be defined by the Raleigh Regional Office)
15. Cherokee Sanford Group shall ensure that all foreign debris (non -brick making
material) shall be removed from the contaminated soil prior to acceptance of the
contaminated soil by Cherokee Sanford Group. Foreign debris removed from
contaminated soil, at the Cherokee Sanford Group property, shall be stored in a
suitable container after initial soil separation, unless specific approval is granted by
the Division's Raleigh Regional Office to only accommodate emergencies or
extenuating circumstances. This foreign debris must be disposed of in a manor
consistent with all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed
by government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Permittee
to insure proper operation of the subject facilities.
2. The Penmittee or designee shall inspect the contaminated soil area to prevent any
discharges which may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a
threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall keep an inspection log or
summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations made, and
any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This log of
inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of three years from the
date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request to the Division of
Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
3. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the disposal site and facility
at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit;
may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and conditions
of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the contaminated soil is disposed of in
accordance with the conditions of this permit and the approved documents.
5

2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to
change ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit
request must be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
accompanied by an application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and
other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will
be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
4. In any future transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
5. A set of approved documents for the subject project must be retained by the
applicant for the life of the project.
6. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental
Management in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
7. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within
thirty (30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee
accordingly may cause the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as
specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
8. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
9. The Permittee, at least six months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request
its extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the
adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit
for such period of time and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem
appropriate.
10. Issuance of this permit hereby voids Permit No. WQ0003219 issued December 17,
1990.
Permit issued this the 15th day of November, 1991
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Lo
George T. E nett, Directo
Division of trvironmental anagement
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
0

' Permit No. WQ0003219
November 15, 1991
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the
project, , for the
Project Name Location
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
7

p Inr lt} / �}-,DISPgs 7� _J !� I f ' \a�,..�� r' II �T•'1C{�I�V 1.++ /•o.
/'�71� � f .J1 V• � � �ja� + em, '� %,may• j i ` I I- `� 48P
SE4&04J
as CAS
a+ 'ri�•'I ���`', I 014
11 r�
water l \�^� �l } '.� _ \/•� ." i \� i
1 5� �t5 � � •-* �„erAlanl' ii'J =_ 'ti ' ' i 1• _.- I .�
Substati0n�a
�. / � � /� � 1 .�{j „;Y,q \p• - �,�"•i�r/I� � .•1 � 1 ti •- i �7Ja I,
•hem -
.s ickhapen `•ate -
�•`r ®,y • � `� � � ` , a t:\\�' . � �carrGu..t"G � t>o � ' r�9t
00 Jae

i
I!
-7 y
.�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • A
Raleigh Regional Office
r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor des l
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N FR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
October 17, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL "9S
RETURN RECEIPT REOUIRED U
Mr.J. warren Paschal
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
Subject: Notice of Violation; N.C. General Statutes 143-215.1
Permit No. SR0500046; Brickhaven #2 Mine (Moncure)
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Paschal:
Chapter 143, Article 21, of the North Carolina General
Statutes (G.S.), directs the Environmental Management Commission of
the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(Department) to protect and preserve the water and air resources of
the State. The Division of Environmental Management (Division) has
been charged with the duty and authority to enforce adopted
pollution control rules and regulations.
As Division staff have previously discussed with you, Permit
No. SR0500046 expired on June 30, 1995. Failure to request an
extension of the Permit at least six (6) months prior to its
expiration as required by Section VI General Conditions, Item (9)is
a violation. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of a
permit is a violation of G.S. 143-215.1.
On June 16, 1995, the RRO received a permit application for
renewal and request for modifications of the subject Permit. The
final review of the application and request is pending receipt of
additional information requested by this office in a letter dated
3800 smart Drtve, Suite 101, Raley, North C ollna 276W Telephone [phone] FAX [phone] s
An Equd OppoOl lly Affrmatue Action enpfo 50% reyowd/ 10% pmfca rpaper

Nondischarge Permit No. SR0S00046
October 17, 1995
-Page 2-
September 20, 1995.
Operation of the storage pads for storing petroleum
contaminated soils or any other waste bearing materials without a
permit is also a violation and continues to be a daily violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.1. Failure to comply with
the conditions of the expired permit and/or the operation without
a permit may result in the recommendation of enforcement action to
the Director of the Division of Environmental Management, who may
issue a civil penalty assessment of not more than ten thousand
($10,000) dollars under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A, Please note
that each day of operation without a permit may be considered a
separate offense.
Phillip Orozco of the RRO staff conducted inspections on
August 18 and September 19, 1995. Jay Zimmerman, Hydrogeological
Regional Supervisor was also present during the August 18, 1995
inspection. The following observations were made:
1. CSG has failed to maintain detailed records of water
usage for dust control in accordance with Section IV,
Condition 14 of the subject expired Permit. On September 19,
1995, Mr. Orozco was informed that records of retention pond
water used for wastewater spray irrigation and wastewater used
for dust control were not being maintained separately. CSG
should immediately initiate and maintain records of the volume
of water used for dust control. A detailed record must be
maintained separating total gallons used for dust control from
the total volume of wastewater 0moved from the retention
ponds.
2. On August 18, 1995, Mr. Orozco and Mr. Zimmerman
confirmed the storage of non -petroleum contaminated waste
material being stored on Pad 1 of the permitted facility. On
September 19, 1995, Mr. Orozco was provided a map of Pad 1
showing the various stockpiles of waste material and a list
indicating the generator of each waste. The subject expired
Permit provides for the containment and treatment of petroleum
contaminated soils at the Brickhaven N2 Mine (Moncure
facility). The material in question is considered a "waste"
as defined by Chapter 143, Article 213, Paragraph 18 [G.S.

Nondischarge Permit No. SR0500046
October 17, 1995
-page 3-
143-213. (18) ] of the North Carolina General Statutes. Permit
No. SR05000046 did not provide for the storage or treatment of
any other kind of waste material other than petroleum
contaminated soils. Any request for a new permit will also
have to include application for waste/recycle materials in
addition to petroleum contaminated soils. This includes any
waste material that has been generated from a "static" or
"dynamic" industrial waste stream as defined in the Air
Quality Permit.
In addition, you are requested to submit a written response to
this Notice within fifteen (15) days of its receipt, indicating
your intentions to comply or reasons why you cannot or will not
comply.
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Jay
Zimmerman or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth chus err P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: PRO File/PGO
Arthur Mou erry
John Halley - RRa
Central Files
Permits and Compliance Unit/Groundwater Central Office
Chatham County Health Department
cherosr.nov

.I
F
0
F
0

.}r..
4
..
_j
L
i
�P
}
y.

/// I � ��/ �i Sri r� � I rrr ���i�
r
'? / IP,' �
�-
l' l 1 I � � + 1
i ii ` i

i
H
1
t
♦
�
�
.
'I
�V
•
F
��
� i
�.
_
•
-
`�
`.
�
�
,.
III
'
`� �
�
�
�
�.,1 �
III
�
.'..
�
.. �

DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
September 29, 1995
W 6MMI,
RECEIVED
DEHNR
P T 2 1n95
LAND QUALITY SECTION
TO: Judy Wehner, Assistant Mining Spec- I t
FROM: John Holley, Regional Eng nee
SUBJECT: Brickhaven No. 2 (19-OB)
Cherokee Sanford Group
Chatham County
We have reviewed the renewal and modification request for this
site, and as indicated by Tim's memo attached, we have found the
S&E plan to be satisfactory. However, the following additional
comments are necessary regarding input from other agencies:
(1) DEM comments are attached. You will note that significant
concern has been expressed by both Groundwater and Water
Quality staff. It appears that there will be considerable
difficulty with respect to the DEM permitting associated
with the handling of contaminated soils.
(2) As we have discussed, I was contacted by Jean Manuelle of the
Corps concerning the brickbat dams that now exist in the
primary watercourse through this site and their long-range
reclamation. They are pleased with their current condition
relative to wetland enhancement and would like to see them
remain as a permanent feature. I do not see any problem with
their use in the permanent reclamation plan, but I believe that
they must be periodically cleaned -out as long as the site is
being mined and operated. This latter concern may be in
conflict with the Corps wishes, so it is recommended that you
contact Jean to discuss this matter more fully before you
respond to the application.
If there are any questions, please advise.
JLH
D

,. 11 it . I
I I I

•
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
September 26, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Judy Wehner, Asst. Mining Specialist
')KFROM: Tim Holland, Assistant Regional Engineer
THROUGH: John Holley, Regional En eer
SUBJECT: Brickhaven No. 2 Mine 19-08
Chatham County
I have reviewed plans for the referenced mine
permit renewal and modification request. The plan appears
complete and adequate.

MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
DEM Comments - Water Quality
Project: UPICA4W6,ti =#-� County: C.46-yyf--
Assigned To•� Due 7425 Completed: 9.�
REVIEW ISSUES: '/ T r' ( / ,'/
Watershed/Stream Name and Classification: 0 b6JA(frc,K�i UT hS/Q4C/EW
Comments: bO K
PERMITS:
YES NO
NPDES Permit Required q A
NPDES Permit Existing (no. ) 069
Nondischarge Permit Required �p�,��� X
Nondischarge Permit Existing (no.tdLg0L1175?9 —
Notice of Violation Issued (date(s)_ 1)74nv-' 2C*44*0
Enforcement Actions Taken (date(s)
Comments: 41r �a'c/6'iy �k'+5 a /2�C9rd of L&w�bn�� �1tro /��3 /E+ YiYa�ll'n .o io
/4Ae /Iv naf, AF' �i'?a�e� �b1-1GX so2iy/Fre/a��d an (i.I.yCLro75d'9),
.:d a ; �a2cf Nnri'/an Q/�P,rHa �iYZ
y¢ran /J j.SSlzeo� ,qo7" /uJt 4WAY6/ frrp
ENVIRONML`NTAL ISSUES: 6
Wetlands Disturbed by Activity _
401 Certification Required
Comments: q - E i 70*O4n/Y!
n 517cC4 !1,
��,qaa R
Approved by:f//iPL�e Date:

0 •
MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
DEM Comments - Air Quality
Project: 1'�ncK-({v}✓q./ H'v �� County:
Assigned To: #AKAlh /VeNOM Due: q 2 iS Completed: '?4L 95—
REVIEW ISSUES•
YES NO
Air Permit Required X
Air Permit Existing (no. ) X
Notice of Violation Issued (date(s) ) x
Enforcement Actions Taken (date(s) ) x
Comments: prao� Joi& AAe ,A44i
Approved by: Date:

i
MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
DEM Comments - Groundwater
Project: Uala-rtt�uy County: CAIDF>/�
Assigned To:$iAi/.D/?!%//1%g5 Due:Completed: 9/a��g$
�7—
REVIEW ISSUES:
YES NO
Well Permit Required
Well Permit Existing (no. )
Groundwater Contamination Problem
Notice of Violation Issued (date(s)
Enforcement Actions Taken (date(s)
Approved by: Y e Date:
W/LL 3F SSS =1� TO RB/oL/YcE THE sPR9Y-Z/22/d/,!T/D�
PEnm%T Ss PREM17-AVRE A7->30-<T- As o/' iP RCcr /✓T
�NS!'Ec7/oni �9I19� 9 S`% r rT flPPEA25 cJ1ER0 KEC �S
Zn/ ✓iDLAT/0 ✓ of f'EYiarT No-'S i✓eP000'2SeD
`�� S
SRo50004(0 . T//E v/oLAT/ONS cosH1D BE D If
.
accttiRRlnlb an/ TNF 6R/9Y.9Rf/9sle of oERTA/>J Pc=RmiT
�o/✓DiTion/3 , THERf /9RE frRG�95� cnr✓cERNS ltEGs//ZDI.n/G
cJ/ERoKfrrS .tn/TcR�RETBTJDnI or' PE.YinrT z/9N6H9bF-
/9t cu Rrzc�T<Y P2onosc�D XI T)NF nl TN<
RRO —GD✓ SEcT7ord Mis�T REGO1v)A1 T/iE /✓/OD/F/o/%rJD/
TO PERM rT ' / % - o S A3r DEn/%ED _

r O5!`1
State of North Caroi,l 10
,.Department- of, Environment -
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James.B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 1, 1995
Ms. Kristen Peters
1383 Phillips Boulevard
Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004
Subject: Questions Regarding.Cherokee Sanford
-Moncure Facility (Brickhaven No.. 2)
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Peters:
You had previously called our .office to `'inquire about several
questions related'to the subject facility. I have been asked to
respond to your telephone call.
The Division of Environmental Management Water Quality Section has
the responsibility for the issuance of wastewater spray irrigation
permits. The Division's Groundwater Section has the responsibility
for the -issuance of permits for contaminated soil remediation
activities and the Division's- Air Quality Section has: the -
responsibility for the issuance of permits related'. to air quality.
I will address the Water Quality Section responsibilities and wi11..
forward your questions to the other agencies' supervisor- for an
appropriate response.
On November-21, 1992, the Division issued -a Notice of Violation to
Cherokee Sanford for an incident -involving an explosion, fire, and
subsequent oil. spill. On -November 23, 1992, the Division issued an
NOV for the•failure.to remove the oil (from the incident described.
above) in a timely manner. On June 2, 1993, the Division issued.a
civil penalty assessment against Cherokee Sanford. for. matters
related to the explosion,.fire, and oil spill incident. .,
The Cherokee Sanford Group Moncure facility (Brickhaven No. 2.)
holds Permit No. WQ0007589, which was issued on August ll,..1993..
This permit was issued for the construction and operation of, a
22,496 GPD wastewater 'spray irrigation system for the.. land
application of wastewater runoff from the contaminated- soil.`
stockpile. area and for the land application of retention pond
water. It appears that -the last formal inspection of this facility
that was performed 'by Water Quality staff occurred on .March... 18.,
1993, in conjunction with the request for the spray,. irrigation
permit. On March 22, 1993, the Division issued an NOV to Cherokee"..
Sanford for an overflow of the retention pond. At that. -..-time,
Cherokee Sanford had submitted its application to the Division -.for,
the spray irrigation permit discussed above.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh. North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycied/ 10%post-consumer paper

10
Ms. Kristen Peters
/ August 1, 19.9 5
'Page 2 ,,.::._ . • ,
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact -Mr.. Randy Jones or me at 919/571-4700.
Sincerely,
Ju- y Garrett. ,
• Regional.. Water -Qua-lity Supervisor
_ ..,
_„
'.
�•:I.'
4
-M1 .fir# � - ....
:.:.
file: •CHEROKEE..LET
_...
;
.�s`w'
zz
'
fir+^.
_z. t't[-:�.is
�, i; =.i•' ... �...w;..,.. .. .,

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM O
TO: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary SFp
Land Quality Section
FROM: Larry E. Wildl\'s D
District Wildlife Biologist
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: September 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request, Cherokee Sanford Brick
Brickhaven # 2 - Permit # 19-08
Chatham County, North Carolina
These comments are provided pertaining to Fish & Wildlife concerns
related to the mining permit renewal and modification request for
Cherokee Sanford Brick in Chatham County. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971, (G.S. 79-46
through 79-68,15 NCAC 5; as amended, 1982).
A site visit was conducted on September 15 and the following comments
pertain to the permit. The main area to be impacted is the northern
portion where the excavation will occur and where a new berm is to be
constructed. This area is mixed hardwood/pine with low wildlife value.
A major powerline R-O-W, which provides edge habitat, is along this
northern border. A portion of this property is lowlands with drainages
and these areas provide quality cover. The existing erosion control
system has created some wetlands in the center of the area and appears
to be an excellent filtering system for water run off. These should be
maintained as are. Songbirds, furbearers, deer, raptors and several
small game species currently use the property. The drainage areas carry
most of the water from the property into Gulf Creek which feeds into the
Haw River which is several miles away. The sediment ponds appear to be
sufficient to contain most of the runoff. The proposed expansion of the
spray irrigation system appears to have merit in that the quality of
water leaving the site would probably be improved.

•
We do not expect significant impacts to fisheries or wildlife resources
from activities associated with this project expansion and/or
modification. A plan is on hand to reseed the berm to wildlife foods
and we recommend legumes such as Kobe lespedeza be used where practical.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit renewal and
modification request. Please contact us if we can be of further
assistance.
cc: Harlan T. Hall, Wildlife Management
Owen Anderson, Habitat Conservation
Wayne Green, Dir. Engineering

State of A Carolina •
Department of Environment.
Health and Natural Resources &74•
Division of Land Resources
AM
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes. Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
August 31, 1995
MEMORANDUM `L Sl
To: Mr. Owen Anderson `�! S 1995
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator N RHC4.,VFD
Wildlife Resources Commission �,4a
P�
From: Susan B. Edwards �c�
Mining Program secretary 6781L1915�y
Land Quality Section
Re: Mining Permit Renewal and Modification Request for Cherokee
Sanford Group
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine - Permit No. 19-08
Chatham County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal
and modification application for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries
(G. S. 74-51 (2)) . Please respond by September 29, 1995 so that we may
complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals
and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and
sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain
erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be
greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it
is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up
a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS
WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at [phone] if you
have any questions.
SHE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
Geological ku ey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX:.[phone] FAR: 733-2876 FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equol apportundy Amrmatiye Action Employer 5 recycled/ lea pcabconwmer paper

vWr-�+s+e,yy.�yptlrpUvya„FY4yl.��i.�91'YRVYL`dlrw*'vn+VGF!IA'nA�"M4'i'.'n4,ldWY�,�'CI.M�a'��w.'byNlyri"�A1M+^NVt✓r�MAi%f{%n'u'"j�;�.'M:O"l�tk.'-ir'�4i'S
DATE TO ASMTANT 3 4PATE TO SUSAN '3I
LOGGED IN
n /I MINING /CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company CA. stp4 GeY-AProject Name Bto kkl* /Jo Z.Permit No. /1-49R County U&fAA... Date Received '30'
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New L`T Renewal �J Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information+ ❑ Fee Needed
2 Fee Received: Amount$ % S20,o d
Please route to:
Er Field Office
EWildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other: . F)H 41br.-t/
Date Routed pg�g /,/6�
Date Routed D .3 % 5
Date Routed
Date Routed
suspense Date for comments: `l— Zy —/r5 (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following:
\ *SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

State of N01h Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
August 31, 1995
n w • • b Jv.
Affia
^` y
®E""Fl,
To: Mr. Owen Anderson
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
From: Susan B. Edwards .� p✓
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Re: Mining Permit Renewal and Modification Reauest for Cherokee
Sanford Group
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine - Permit No. 19-08
Chatham County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal
and modification application for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries
(G. S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by September 29, 1995 so that we may
complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals
and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and
sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain
erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be
greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it
is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up
a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS
WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued
greatly appreciated,
have any questions.
SHE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
Geological Survey Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
cooperation in the review of these type requests is
Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at [phone] if you
Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone]
FAX; 733-2876 FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%posr-consumer paper

� s

H01 F'N
NORTH CAROLIN AryU RESOURCES
LANDOF EN I RONMENT, HEALTH, "6yj O
LAND QUALITY SECTION 4(pL?
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT 44fVDQU
((PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) q(/)�S
FCnoh
1. Name of Mine Brirlhaven No. 2 _ County Chatham /
2. Narne of Applicant'_ Chen))icq Sanford Croup _
3. Permanent addrom for receipt of official mail' 1600 Colon Road, Sanford NC 27330
Telephone_ 019)775-2121
4. Mine Office Address_ (taute 1 Box 263 Monoure NC 27559
Telephone... [phone]
5. Mine Manager JodR.Burna . _�. ....
We hereby certify thin all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct. to the boat of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
tevoraRon- //
•`Signaturet Date
i
Print Nam R. Way o Greene
Title P d/=_L•it/G/.vr_i:P//✓/r.
• This will be the nome that the mining permit will be issued to nod �yprpc that must be indicated
ou the mclamatlon bond or other security that corresponds to this site.
•• The Land Quality Section most be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone
number, p
•'• Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department ¢hall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days
of receipt of a ggltrpjgte application or, If a pu ie hearing.s hold, within 30 days following the hearing
nod the Min& of airy supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be
addressed gad, all required maps provided before this application can be eunaldared complete. Attach
additional 10eas as needed,

1 f •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of Mine Brickhaven No. 2 County Chatham
2. Name of Applicant* � Cherokee Sanford Group
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 1600 Colon Road, Sanford, NC 27330
Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address Route 1 Box 263 Moncure, NC 27559
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager John Burns
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature
Print Name R. Wa e Greene ..
Title
Date
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated
on the reclamation bond or other securithat corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone
number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days
of receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing
and the filing of any supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be
addressed and all required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach
additional sheets as needed.

0 •
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
■ NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
a. If this is an application for a NEW rc .n."t, indicate the total acreage at the site to be
covered by the permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):_
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: iNlining Permit No.:_
19-08 Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be
based upon): 382
c. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining
permit number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining
Permit
No.: 19-08 Total permitted acreage: 382
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No . If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the
acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 20
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No X . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected
'4disturbed, ground cover removed by the mining operation? Yes X No (if no, a
minor modification fee of $50.0 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be
added). If yes, indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the
permit (the total acreage to be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major
modification" fee will be based upon). ?0
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: -
Total permitted acreage:
■ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Indicate the approximate longitude and latitude, in degrees -minutes -seconds, of the center of
the mine site: LONGITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 35' -- 52' -- 45" Quadrangle: Moncure
LATITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 80' -- 18' -- 3"
3. Name of all materials mined: shale and claystone
-2-

0 •
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck X Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
5. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 40 Reference elevation: 260'
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 20
6. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No If no, proceed to
Question 7.
a. Acreage of previouslyaffected land(s) at present site that has not been reclaimed:
37 acres (identitall areas on your mine map(s)).
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted? Cherokee Sanford Group
C. Acrea e of Previously affected land at present site that has been reclaimed: 0
acres identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
d. When and by whom was this activity conducted?
e. Do you wish to exclude any areas noted in 6a or c from this permit application?
Yes No X . If yes, how much? acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
7. Present (pre -mining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Croacres Pasture acres Forestry acres Fi pland sh/Wildlife 345 acres
Recreation acres Other 37 acres (Specify use: mining)
8. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry acres Fish/Wildlife 382 acres
Recreation acres Other acres (Specify use: )
9. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10
B. MAPS
1. Four (4) copies of the county highway maps and four (4) copies of all mine maps and
reclamation maps shall be submitted with each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
Clearly label and mark the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
-3-

1
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site., All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled
on the maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining
permits can only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only
denote those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit.
All maps must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly
illustrate the following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be
located including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.d.Outline and width of all buffer zones
(both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
v Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
fi. Location and acreage of all processiniz plants (processing plants may be described as to
location and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams. rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100 year flood lain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land.
p. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales must, at a minimum, meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres l inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
-4-

I 0 i
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of
tailings/sediment ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/hauI roads, mine excavation and any
other major aspect of the mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life
of the mining permit. A table/chart similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
within pit area
Stockpiles
27.5 ac
Wastepiles
0
Processing Area/Haul Roads
1 ac
Mine Excavation
55 ac
Other
0
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
-5-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other
waste water handling? Yes No X If yes, briefly describe all such processes
including any chemicals to be used.
See lb
b. Will the opperation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant'?
Yes No X If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge and locate all
proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine map(s).
It should be noted that petroleum contaimnated soil and other recyclable and non-liazardous
materials are temporarily being stored in an area outside of the active mine area under
Permit No. SR050046. Runoff water from this area is collected by three basins. The
collected water is applied through a spray irrigation system under Permit No. WQ0007589.
Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
Yes No X If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes No if
yes. what impact, if an ,will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Locate all existing
wells on the mine map) that lie within 500.feet of theproposed excavation area. Provide data
to support any conclusions or statements made. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale
is served by a public water system or private wells.
N/A
d. If the mine will extend below the water table, what is the pre -mining depth (in feet) to the
seasonal high and low ground water tables? High ft. Low ft. What is the
source of this information?
N/A
e. if you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied
for or obtained the a it appropriate water duality perms) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, etc.)
from the Division of Environmental 1vlanagement, Water Quality Section.
0

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions?
Yes No X . If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air
quality permit issued by the Division of Environmental Management, Air Quality Section,
or local governing body-
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Haul roads are stabilized with broken brick or crushed rock. Stockpiles and haul roads will
be wetted to control dust, if needed.
3. Describe in detail the chronological sequence of land disturbing activities and reference the
sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
Mining is occurring in the areas noted on the mine map. Mining has progressed to the northern
limits from the south western side of the creek. The stockpile area has already been disturbed,
also.
See the mine map for more information.
4. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and
during mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion
control for mine ewavation(s), waste piles, accesslmine roads and process areas), and give a
detailed sequence of installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and
label all sediment and erosion control measures on the mine ma
,p(s) and provide typical cross-
sectionslconstruction details of each measure. Engineering designs and calculations shall be
required when needed to justify the adequacy of any proposed measures.
All necessary erosion control measures have been installed in the field. The check dams are
installed and functioning.in the creek. The sediment basins located in the excavation area and
below the contaminated soil stockpile area has been installed. also.
The modification to disturb approx. 20 acres within the previously permitted area requires that
the dams in the creek be re-evaluated. The structures can adequately control sedimentation by
minor adjustments in the field. See the attached calculations package for more information.
-7-

0 •
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. a. How wide a buffer will be maintained between any minim activity and any adjoining permit
boundary or right-of-way? Buffers must be located within the permit boundaries. Buffers
along permit boundaries must be, at a minimum, unexcavated buffers. Show all buffer
locations and widths on the mine mup(s).
Buffer widths are noted on the mine map.
b. How wide a buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within the
permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands? Buffers along natural
watercourses and wetlands must be undisturbed. Show all buffer locations and widths on the
mine map(s).
Buffer widths are noted on the mine map.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit
boundaries during mining.
All cut slopes will be maintained at a 2:1 slope or flatter.
b. Describe other methods to be taken duntip mining to prevent physical hazard to any
neighboring dwelling house. public road. public, commercial or industrial building from any
mine excavation. Locate all such structures on the mine map if thew are within 300 feat of anv
proposed excavation.
No such buildings are located within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
-8-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
c. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any
high wall area and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate
fencing and adequate boulder barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A
constniction detaililcross-section and location of each tvpe of barricade to be used must be
indicated on the mine map(s).
No highwalls will be constructed. Perimeter excavation slopes are maintained at 2:1 (H: V)
or flatter.
d. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s) for all fill slopes (berms. wastepiles, overburden
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any
benches andlor slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the method of
final stabilization.
See the mine map. No wastepiles, overburden disposal areas or berms (other than highwall
barriers) are expected at this site.
e. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be
provided on the mine map(s).
All cut slopes will be maintained at a 1 slope or flatter.
f. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the effected maximum depth of the excavation.
NIA
7. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes No X How will acid water
pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
in

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
8. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation
from public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building
berms or other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map(s) and
provide cross -sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacings, sizes and species for uee
plantings.
This site is situated away from roads and buildings and is already screened from public view.
Therefore, no visual screening is proposed.
9. Will explosives be used? Yes No X . If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and
describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring
property from flyin rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations. Locate the nearest offsite
occupied stnicture(s to the proposed excavation(s) on the mine map and indicate its approximate
distance to the proposed excavation.
10. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No
If yes, describe these materials, how they rill be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
.Indicate the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Petroleum contaminated soils are being stockpiled on site for use in processing. These
stockpiles are noted on the mine map. The appropriate permits have been obtained from the
Division of Environmental Management.
No solvents or chemical reagents are stored on -site.
Portable tanks are used for refueling the excavation equipment. These tanks comply with
appropriate local, state and federal rules and regualtions.
11. Are any processing waste, overburden or other such mine wastes to be disposed of off -site?
Yes No_X . If yes, describe in detail what these wastes are and how they will be
disposed. Attach a separate site map(s) showing the location(s) of the disposal area(s). Include all
,specifications for erosion and sediment control.
-10-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands
and indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This information must he
illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with the information provided on the
mine map(s).
All areas will be positively drained and revegetated. Any sediment basins will be drained and
graded to provide positive drainage. All disturbed areas will be revegetated according to the
revegetation plan.
The mine area will form a lake once mining operations have been completed.
2. a. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be Ieft as a of the reclamation?
Yes X No If yes, illustrate the location of the bodypart
) of water on the reclamation
map and provide a stated cross-section(s) through the proposed body(s) of water. The
minimum average water depth must be at Ieast 4 feet unless information is provided to
indicate that a more shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site. Will
the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes No X . If yes, specify species.
NIA
b. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting or remaining
in mined areas. Provide details and locations of any permanent water outlets on the
reclamation map.
All disturbed areas will be positively rained and revegetated. The lake formed by the mine
will be in excess of 20 ft. deep.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations
in rock including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Construction details and
locations of all permanent barricades mush be shown on the reclamation map.
NIA
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site
mine waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and
locations for such areas mast be provided on the reclamation map.
No waste areas are anticipated at this time. However, should it be necessary to dispose of waste.
the slopes of these materials will be 2:1 (H:V) or flatter.
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
All stockpiles will be depleted and the disturbed area graded and vegetated.. On -site
roadways are stabilized with crushed rock or broken brick. No processing areas exist within
the permit boundaries.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No 11' yes,
identify such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent ditch line
stabilization.
The roadway crossing the creek will be left as a part of final reclamation. No roadside
ditches are anticipated.
-12-

9w
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
6. Describe the method of reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins.
All sediment basins will be drained, positively graded and vegetated.
Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal. We
machinery,
cables, or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act
of 1971). No off -site generated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written
approval from the NC Department of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources, Land
Quality Section and either the Division of Solid Waste Management (DSWM) or local governing
body. If a disposal permit has been issued by DSWM for the site, a copy of said permit must
be attached to this application. All temporary and permunent refto'e disposal areas must be clearly
delineated on the mine map(s) and reclamation map, along with a list of items to be disposed in said
areas.
No waste products are anticipated at this site. However, should it become apparent that it is
necessary to dispose of waste, the disposed materials will meet the guidelines established in the
Solid Waste Sections Policy Recycling and Reuse (Memorandum 16) and the letter dated
September 14, 1992, by Mark Fry.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a
condition minimizing erosion, siltation and'other pollution. Pruride design information, including
typical cross -sections, of any permatent chatihels to be constructed as pail of the reclamation plan.
Indicate the location(s) of all perrnanetn channels on tire reclamation map.
No permanent channels are anticipated at this site.
9. Provide a schedule of reclamation that indicates the sequence of reclamation and approximate
time frame. if reclamation is to be accomplished concurrently with mining then clearly indicate on
the mine map(s) and reclamation map each segment that is to be mined and reclaimed during each
year of the permit. Add drawings showing typical cross -sections and final features of the proposed
reclamation.
Mining will advance to the north. The southern excavation areas will be reclaimed first.
-13-

Nit
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
10. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan
must include recommendations for year-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the
amount and type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must
include general seeding instructions for permanent revegetation and, if necessary, temporary
revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings is not acceptable. NOTE: The
Revegetation Plan must be approved and signed by one of the following:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District:
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources:
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service,
specialists and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest
Resources at North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects:
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources;
I. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre):
4,000 lb/ac ground agricultural limestone
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (poundslacre):
1,000 lb/ac 10-10-10
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND
SEEDING SCHEDULE (poundslacre):'
Common Bermudagrass (hulled) 6-8 Ib/ac
Sericea lespedeza (scarified) 50 Ib/ac
USE ABOVE SEEDING MIX AUG. 20 - OCT, 25 OR FEB. 1 - APR. 15
Add:
from May l - Aug. 15
German millet 10 lb/ac
from Aug 15 - May 1
rye grain 40 Ib/ac
MULCH - TYPE AND. RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF
ANCHORING: 1.
4,000-5,000 Ib/ac grain straw: anchor by crimping or tacking
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS-TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OFAPPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
�eYar��a� Soi�r� Sc4�t%u(P bdsr'c1 ovr 6u;Je FAH SPd��1��- Calr-�J
nn axsik,.,d h S{ef, SGSI 1474 If F5 clesl.r fa use a r5/bb7
Revegetation and/or reforest ion an pproved by: wore a cvleawP
Signature r Date 3D&Le4L/r--T
Print Name T. Patrick Shillingto
Title Engineer
Agency Engineering & Environmental Science Company
14-

•
•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be toed to establish an appropriate bond (based upon a
range of $500 to $5, 000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approved
by the Department to be affected during the life of the mining permit.
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
RECLAMATION
CATEGORY ACREAGE
COST/ACRE
COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
0 Ac. X
$
/Ac.
_ $
Stockpiles
27.5 Ac. X
$
2500.00
/Ac.
_ $
68,750.00
Wastepiles
0 Ac. X
$
/Ac.
_ $
Processing Area/Haul Roads
1 Ac. X
$
5000.00
/Ac.
_ $
5000.00
Mine Excavation
55 Ac- X
$
1500.00
/Ac.
_ $
82,500.00
Other
Ac. - X
$
/Ac.
_ $
TOTAL ACREAGE:
83.5 Ac.
SUBTOTAL COST: $
156,250.00
Additional Reclamation Cost Factors:
a. Inflation:
❑ for permit life of l to 5
years:
SUBTOTAL COST X
0.10
= $
X for permit life of 6 to 10
years:
SUBTOTAL. COST X
0,25
= $
3906250
b. Mobilization:
SUBTOTAL COST X
0.40
= $
62,500.00
c. Administration:
SUBTOTAL COST X
0.20
= $
31,250.00
a + b + c = $ 132,812.50
+ SUBTOTAL COST
=
$
289.062.50
TOTAL RBCLAKATIOB
BOND COST:
_ $
289,062.50
(round
down to
the nearest $100.00)
-15-

•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "Notice" form, or a facsimile thereof, attached to this application must be sent certified or
registered mail to all landowners who are adjoining (contiguous to) the permit boundaries as
indicated on the mine map(s). The only exception to the above is if another means of notice is
approved in advance by the Director, Division of Land Resources.
A copy of a tax map (or other alternative acceptable to the Department) must be mailed with the
completed "Notice" form (the proposed overall permit boundaries and the names and locations of
all owners of record of land adjoining said boundaries must be clearly denoted on the tax map).
The "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be completed, notarized and
submitted to the Department, with the remainder of the completed application form, before the
application will be considered complete.
NOTE: THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS FOR NEW MINING
PERMITS AND FOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS THAT ADD ADJACENT LAND TO A
MINING PERMIT.
■ SEE THE NEXT TWO PAGES FOR THE "NOTICE" FORM AND THE "AFFIDAVIT OF
NOTIFICATION'
-16-

•
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50 of The'%RCL of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
has applied on
(Applicant Name) (Date)
to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment.
Health,
and Natural Resources, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611, for (check one):
(a) a new surface mining permit
(b) a modification to add adjacent land to an existing surface mining permit
The applicant proposes to mine on acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number)
of
(Miles) (Direction) (Nearest Town)
off/near road in
(Road Number/Name) (Name of County)
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50, the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to notify
all owners of record of land adjoining (contiguous) to the proposed mine site (permit boundaries), and
to notify the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in which the site is located. Any
person may file written comment(s) to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the
issuance of this Notice or the filing of the application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the
Department determine that a significant public interest exists relative to G.S. 74-51, a public hearing will
be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials are on file and available for public review during normal
business hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For further
information call [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant written
(Addressee's Name and Address)
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/Mailed to Addressee)
(Name of Applicant)
(Address of Applicant)
17-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
1, , an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant,
for a new Mining Permit, or a modification of an existing Mining Permit that adds adjacent land to the
Mining Permit, from the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, being first
duly sworn, do hereby attest that the following are known owners of record, both private and public, of
the land adjoining the proposed mining permit boundaries and that notice of the pending application has
been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said owners of record at their addresses shown
below, such notice being given on a form provided by the Department:
(Adjoining Landowner Name) (Address)
(Attach additional list if necessary)
I do also attest that the followin& individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or
municipality in which the proposed mining site is located and that notice of the pending application has
been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said office at the following address:
(Chief Administrative Officer Name) (Address)
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the
Department that a reasonable effort has been made -to notify the owners of record of the ad'oinine land
and the chief administrative officer of the county or�municipality in compliance with N.C.G.T 74-�0 and
15A N.C.A.C. 5B .0004(d). I understand that it is the responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts
of mailing showing that the above notices were ' caused to be mailed and to provide them to the
Department upon request.
Date
Signature of Applicant
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following
information: (Name of applicant) ; (title of person
executing Affidavit)
I, , a Notary Public of the County of ,
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit was
made by him/her.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of , 19
My Commission expires:
Notary
-18-

G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed re resentatives the right of entry and travel
upon our lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field
inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of
LICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever
entries on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably
necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond
forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLICANT
Signature Signature *
Print Name:
Address
Print Name:
Title:
Company:
Telephone Mine Name:
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
Four (4) copies of the completed application, four (4) copies of all mine maps and reclamation maps, and
the appropriate processing_ fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent
to the Land Quality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application
form.
Inquiries re ardin the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program
ff staat (91� 733 4574.
-I-

G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We heroby grant to the Department or its appointed myresentativen the right of catty and travel
upon our lands or operadon during regular businem hours for the purpose of malting necessary flold
[ONnFOR A MINA ay��e rB pnnbly required in the administration of the Mining Act of
We further grant to the Department or its appointed mpresentatives the right to make whatever
entries on the land as may be rensonably necessary and to take whatever Actions as ma be reasonahly
necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bona
forfelture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNEIL- APPI,ICAN`1'
Signature
Print Name:
�
Signature *�
Pratt Name:--
1-A&'='- 4 2 /V G 1 .2 -7 33 Cf� ......� Company:
"Telephone ` f /? 7. 7 � � % 2- Mine Name:
*Signature must be the some as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
Four 4 MOM -Of thO Conn leted 3mine ma sand recla ptlM—maps. and
the ry ri (see next pays for fee schedule) In the form a check or money order
pmyab a to the North Caronna Department or Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent
to the Land Duality- Section Ce tir�(llce at the addreus lilted on the front cover of thls application
form.
inquiries rc uTdin the, status of the review of this npplication should be directed to the Mining Program
staff at [phone].

0 els
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE COMPANY
300E ANDERSON DRIVE. SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NG 27609
[phone] RECEIVED
DEHNR
August 30, 1995
Mr. R Wayne Green
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
1600 Colon Road
Sanford, NC 27025
LAND QUALRY SECTION
RE: Erosion Control Evaluation
Brickhaven No. 2 Mine
Permit No. 19-00
Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Green:
Following is a general discussion of the mining project and erosion
control evaluation for the Brickhaven No. 2 Mine. The conclusions
of this evaluation are reflected on the prepared mine map.
Attached are the supporting calculations.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
The Brickhaven No. 2 Mine (Per;nit No. 19-08) in Chatham County,
North Carolina, contains 33": acres of permitted land.
Approximately 63.5 acres of this land has been disturbed, and an
additional 20 acres will be disturbed within the next ten years.
In addition to the excavation for materials that produce brick,
petroleum -contaminated materialE: and other non -hazardous recyclable
materials are stockpiled at this site and are later blended with
the mined materials to produce brick.
At the active mine area, precipi%:a':ion collects in this excavation.
Thiswater is periodically pumper, into a settlement basin where the
water drains by gravity. Mining will continue in a northerly
direction, with these activit es always resulting in the
precipitation accumulation in the mine excavation. During the
initial stripping of the topsoil. as the mine expands to the north,
it may be necessary to construct. a temporary diversion berm to
ensure that the water drains ..ato the mine excavation. The
northward expansion of the mine will be in increments.
Three (3) erosion control struc':uces are present along the creek,
and two (2) of the structures are associated with access road
crossings. The three erosion control structures have resulted in
conversion of the creek into we:t).and conditions and the previous
vegetation is beginning to he replaced with various wetland
species. These structures receive runoff from the stockpile areas
as well as wood upland.

0 •
The non -hazardous recyclable materials are stored on pads that have
relatively impervious soil liners (coefficient of permeability of
0.0000001 centimeters per second or slower). The pads are isolated
from the remainder of the mine area by diversion berms. These
berms prevent discharge of runoff, which is collected in three
basins. The collected water is:-emoved by two (2) spray irrigation
systems. One system follows the haul road and the water is applied
for dust control. The other irrigation system discharges water to
undisturbed woods.
EROSION CONTROL EVALUATIONS
A 7.5 hp electrical pump is used to transfer runoff water from the
mine to the settlement basin. With an elevation difference of
approximately 20 ft. (depth of water collection after heavy rains)
and a total 2 inch diameter PVC pipe length of 100 ft., the pump
would have a maximum flow rate of 0.46 ft3/5. Using the surface
area requirement for a 10 year main event, the required basin size
is 2003 ft2. The actual basin size is about 7 times greater
(15,000 ft2). (See attachment for calculations.
The evaluations of the three erosion control structures in the
creek are in a previously performed study. A copy of this study
dated September 14, 1992, is provided separately. The conditions
for these evaulatios were essentially the same except that the
projected disturbance (which would increase flow rates) is less
than originally assumed. Originally 37 acres were projected to be
disturbed and drain through this area. However, since the
excavation area will always have its water diverted to the mine,
the total additional disturbance has increased about 10 acres
(expanded stockpile area).
Upon completion of mining, the excavation will be allowed to form
a lake. The pump settlement basin outlet will serve as the outlet
for this lake. The bermed area between the excavation and the
basin will be removed. The upslope drainage area is relatively
small and for a 25-year rain event the water levelwill rise 0.92
feet if no discharge is allowed.
POSSIBLE F'U` ..URE ACTIVITIES
The following discusses possible future activities that are
difficult to predict at this time. However, these activities
should be discussed for future clarity.
625

Tentatively, Cherokee Sanford Group plans to modify the discharge
permit for the spray irrigation system that applies water in the
woods. It is desired to convert the system to an over land system
with the incorporation of the water that collects in the mine.
Portions or all of this system need to be removed at some point in
time as the mine expands toward this area. Cherokee Sanford would
like to experiment with the utilization of vegetation to remove
colloidal clay particles, before portions of the spray irrigation
area are excavated. The water would drain through the woods and
eventually reach the stream with the three erosion control
structures.
CLOSURE
We appreciate serving Cherok,�ie Sanford Group, Inc. on the
Brickhaven No. 2- Mine. Ple&SE� contact us if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
l�
Pe U. Chesson
Mining Specialist
atrick Shi - i n,
President
tn""Mrir��
f
�ZN C':Rp",�,
te
= SEAL = i`
— 1547
Attachment: Erosion Control CaLculations
615

�J
O
ATTACHMENT:
Erosion Control Calculations
615

ya5 br,5wo'O c
nod, pl.frndFn
7�r7Sr/- = fi 6 ff uti
S�y�ui 1t1Q'=ddfa,7
n

0 0

• � i��7P�.-a�J
C/'�/�c/ /�.s ,�r�1Ti<i�yah lS

® /✓gip jo�i
/�GIl�P oUfIPf G14Yiv� /t//y F' //FL �vs�+w!'u✓!
/� fGfGI �p1GV srr p,, w.I./ 6P aouu 7� /22 40e 1114�fo
r}P
r-c Fn 36'�14 F171
C �m vs4f C-0pA//�I/ dl �a FO dN(���j_P //'P�o �i ✓'%f/

RTH CAROLINA T 7.5 MINUTE SERIES {
MERRY OAKS 1.8 Ml. --- Y .OAKS1, 1676 1677 2'30" 6781 149 FEET 1679 '4 d 1680
IUAL
L;7-Dis saf /
5 r Agin
�.I`•::1,p�� �-` Its I '. \ - J 1 �, 1��."r'1' � lt., ��
1.3
~� Bra
\Vr k—//
Z
`Water
r i Tank• i �� /' �'' ��� �•
IL
00
att
5uhstation177
p
1.% ~. i1 It ' 1 -'cern 1
, C / - '�em: • /1° zoo J -�
ckflaven -
_ ,`� ' f 11 �`� ' i •` III ��� � � � `� � `•�V•;.'..�..:;. �-��r?�' ' i �..�'
� ` ', r-I j'� -� I+fs _.. �-•.. }•I'. I 1 / •.'.`.:'��':.:;-7,'� ..•.^
` }}^r' •^�'�n1IK�']A` ",1 I, { - RFO •1 :'. ay.•111( �/ I`�.�`^ _; 1�iti-_.i V•-'_.
7--1-7': ,%�/ L1 •l1�'%
T.
��"• \,�.-..� 1 }� � � �\ \ ` 1 � � � i�Ipp � rti��P�- '\ — % (try /_

o-2
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
Project �"�! %IG ✓!✓! rw, 2 /%l; )7 e By 7A5 pace
Location LR../Hps� �ewH �/ Checked Data
f
Circle one: Present Developed
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Sall name
and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, tree teenc, and
hydrologic condition;
percent impervious;
unconnected/connected impervious
area ratio)
t
CN J
Area
Xacrea
❑e1'-
112
Product
of
CN x area
w
Fa
i
i
r.
ee
�Veo//S
Gell- f
ss
55ooa
Use only one CN source per line. Totals
CH (weighted) - total produce 1060. �7 3 Use CN - T 7
total at" -/ 1y ,
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) ................... to
Runoff. 0 .............................. in
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Storm 01
Storm 02
Storm 03
25y/PV
0
3 Z / 2j742S, 5� -�t 3
CMM TR5i, Second Ed.. June 1989)

ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE COMPANY
3005 ANDERSON DRIVE, SUITE 102
RALEIGH. NC 27E09
RECEIVED
(919) 791779e DEHNR
September 14, 1992 rAUli3 0
Mr. John Burns LAND QUAL" SECTION
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 458
Sanford, NC 27330
RE: Hydrologic and Hydraulic Evaluation for Structures at
Brickhaven Mine No. 2, Chatham County, North Carolina
Job No. 070292
Dear Mr. Burns:
The primary purpose of this evaluation is to study the water
passed through three structures at the drainageway that runs
north -south through the property. The study included
determination of peak flow rates for the 10-year and 25-year
frequency rain events, the resistance of these structures to
erosion, and the formation of water behind the structures for
sediment control purposed. The Attachments contain the various
supporting calculations. Following is a brief discussion of the
evaluations.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Three structures cross over the drainageway that runs north -south
through the property. The structures consist of two roadways
with culverts and a check dam. The check dam is the most
downstream structure. Active mining is being conducted west of
the drainageway. Runoff related to mining activity collects in
the mine excavation where it is eventually pumped into a sediment
basin. The water from the basin then drains to the drainageway
immediately upslope of the check dam. The mine excavation will
be advanced northward paralleling the drainageway. Initial
stripping of the ground will result in sediment runoff into the
drainageway upslope of the most upstream roadway. As mining
progresses, the runoff will be collected in the mine excavation.
To the east of the drainageway are three petroleum contaminated
storage stockpile pads. with collection ponds at each stockpile
pad, no runoff from these areas enter the drainageway. Runoff
from land disturbing activities east of the drainageway are only

from roadway and other stockpile areas outside of these petroleum
contaminated soil storage areas.
The most upslope roadway is more than 200 ft. long across the
drainageway. Two-15 inch diameter corrugated metal culverts pass
water through the roadway. The crest of the roadway is 2.5 ft.
higher than the culvert inlet inverts.
The next downslope structure consists of a roadway that is at
least 100 ft. long across the drainageway. A 18-inch diameter
corrugated metal culvert passes water through the roadway.
The crest of the roadway is 4.0 ft. above the inlet of the
culvert. Immediately upslope of the culvert inlet is a brick
check dam that forms a half circle around the pipe inlet. The
crest of the brick check dam is 50 ft. long (radius of about 16
ft.) and is 3.5 ft. above the pipe invert.
The most downstream structure consisting of a brick check dam is
4.0 ft. high. The check dam spans approximately 75 ft. across
the drainageway.
The drainageway ground level is about 4 ft. in elevation
difference at each structure. Past observations by Cherokee -
Sanford personnel, indicates that the roadways have not substained
erosion damage while the most downstream brick check dam had
washed out on several occasions.
EVALUATIONS
The evaluations are related to the various structures that cross
the drainageway. For these structures the following was
addressed:
1. Watershed Runoff Evaluations
2. Flowrate Verses Headwater Depth
3. Erosional Resistance of Structures
4. Sediment Collection Suitability
Following is a brief discussion of the evaluations.
Watershed Runoff Evaluation
Peak flow rates from the 10-year and 25-year frequency rain
events were estimated for each structure using the SCS TR-55
method. The Hydrologic Soil Group "D" was conservatively used

for all areas. Cover consisted of forest with heavy underbrush
or exposed disturbed ground. Since at least 3 percent of the
watershed areas consists of swampy and ponding areas, the peak
flow rates were reduced by 25 percent. The flow rates for each
successive downslope structure were added to the upslope flow
rates.
For the most upslope roadway, the watershed area (WS No. 1) was
175 acres. Approximately 37 acres were assumed disturbed due to
future mining activities. The next downslope roadway had about
14.8 acres (WS No. 2) with 1.4 acres being exposed ground. The
checkdam had about 8.2 acres (WS No. 3) with 0.7 acres exposed.
The following table lists the peak flow rates.
Individual Peak Flow Rates Cumulative Peak Flow Rates
WS No. 10-year
25-year
10-year
25-year
1 167
211
167
211
2 15
19
182
230
3 9
12
191
242
Flowrate Verses Headwater Depth
The flowrate discharge capacity for the various structures were
determined for varying headwater depths. Tailwater effects were
not considered in the analyses since each structure was at least
4 ft. higher than the next downslope structure. General sketches
show each structure on the first page of Attachment B.
For the upslope roadway with the two-15 inch diameter culverts, a
brick checkdam was assume encircling the inlet for the culverts.
The checkdam shaped in a half circle was assumed to have a radius
of 21 ft. (length of 65 ft.) and the crest 2 ft. above the
culvert inverts. Also, the roadway crest was raised 1 ft. to 3.5
ft. above the culvert inlet invert. The length of the roadway in
which overtopping will occur is assumed 100 ft.
In general, for up to 6.0 cubic feet per second flow, the brick
checkdam controls the headwater depth. Above this flowrate, the
culverts control headwater depth and the checkdam becomes
submerged. When the headwater depth is just at the crest of the
roadway, the flowrate is 12.5 cubic feet per second through the
culverts. At the 10-year and 25-year peak flowrates, water
overtops the roadway and the respective headwater depths are 4.15
ft. and 4.25 ft.
For the roadway with the 18 inch diameter culvert, existing

conditions were assumed for the structure. The length of the
roadway was assumed 75 ft. for overflow conditions. The analyses
indicates that the brick checkdam controls the headwater depth up
to 4.6 cubic feet per second. At greater flowrates, the culvert
controls the headwater depths and the brick checkdam is
submerged. When the headwater depth is at the roadway crest
level, the outlet flowrate is 9.5 cubic feet per second.
Headwater depths at the 10-year and 25-year peak flow rates are
4.85 ft. and 4.95 ft., respectively.
For the most downstream structure, the existing conditions of the
check dam were assumed with a width of 50 ft. during overflow
conditions. The headwater depths for the 10-year and 25-year
peak flow rates were estimated at 5.17 ft. and 5.35 ft.
respectively.
Erosion Resistance of Structures
For the roadways, the upslope circular check dams were evaluated
for two situations, at maximum flowrate in which the dams control
the headwater depth and at the headwater depth level with the
roadway crest. once the roadway is overtopped, water flow will
be more dispersed and actual flow over the check dam will not
significantly increase.
Based on the various velocities and depths, the factor of safety
against incipient motion of the brick was determined at the crest
and downslope side of the checkdam. In general, the factors of
safety for both roadway check dams were not less than 6.9 at the
crest, and 4.1 for the downstream slope. The downstream slope
was assumed to have a 4:1 (H:V) slope.
To evaluate the stability of the roadway during overtopping, the
25-year peak flow rate was used. on the crest of the roadway,
water velocities ranged from 4.0 ft./sec. to 4.5 ft./sec. The
velocities are not considered excessive since the roadway
material consists of compacted clay shale with brickbats
intermixed. For material of this type, velocities up to 6.0
ft./sec. are permissible.
Along the downstream slope of the roadways, the waterflow can
cause erosion and to protect the downstream slope, brick bats
were assumed as lining material. For the most upslope roadway,
the slope of the brickbat should be 4:1 (H:V) to obtain a factor
of safety against incipient brick motion of 1.19. For the
downslope roadway the brickbat slope should be 5.5:1 (H:V) to
obtain a factor of safety of 1.25.
For the most downstream brick checkdam, the 25-year peak flowrate
was used to evaluate the factor of safety against incipient

0
motion for the brickbat on the crest and stone lining material on
the downstream slope. At the crest of the check dam, the factor
of safety against brick movement is 1.63. On the downstream side
of the check dam, Class II Rip Rap is required for liner material
with a surface slope of 4:1 (H:V) to achieve a factor of safety
of 1.34.
Outlet protection for the roadway culverts also were evaluated
with headwater depths resulting from the 10-year rain event. The
flow rates require minimal outlet protection and brickbat
material can be used for outlet protection.
Sediment Collection Suitability
The water surface area formed behind each structure for the
10-year rain event meet the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment
Control Guidelines. The upslope circular brick check dams also
will provide sediment control during low flow conditions.
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Based on the analyses, the following should be implemented:
1.' Construct a half circle brick checkdam upslope of the two-
15 inch diameter culverts. The check dam should be 2 ft.
high and have a minimum crest length of 65 ft. The crest
should be at least 5 ft. wide, the upstream slope 2:1
(H:V) and downstream slope 4:1 (H:V).
2. The crest for the roadway with the two-15 inch diameter
culverts should be raised an additional 1 ft.
3. The downstream slope of the roadways should be lined with
brickbats with the brick thickness of at least 1 ft. The
surface of the brick should be sloped at 4:1 (H:V) for the
roadway with the two-15 inch diameter culverts and at
5.5:1 (H:V) for the roadway with the 18 inch diameter
culvert. Laterally from the toe of the slope, the brick
section should continue a minimum distance of 4 ft.
4. with the roadway downstream slopes flattened, the culverts
will need to be extended to daylight at the toe of the
slope. The lateral extension of brick 4 ft. downslope
from the toe of the slope is sufficient for the culvert
outlet protection.
5. The downstream slope of the checkdam will need to be lined
with Class II Rip Rap with a minimum thickness of 2.5 ft.
The surface of the rip rap should be 4:1 (H:V) or flatter.

6. The required crest width for all structures should be
relatively level. The minimum width should be 100 ft. for
the roadway with two-15 inch diameter culverts, 75 ft. for
the roadway with the 18 inch diameter culvert and 50 ft.
for the brick checkdam.
CLOSURE
we appreciate serving you on this project. Please contact us if
you have any questions about this evaluation.
Sincerely,
r
dzzz--(' G�'-
T. Patrick
Shillington, P.E.
President
���.,,,
....., ; !.�,�•;
^;°.���.,
,•- �: r it •,
TPS/dls
•' %r.
Attachment
A
-
Attachment
B
Attachment
C
Attachment
D
•;.�{ � �1 `
,,

FV^,';7ia�] l� < •'al:.. ��� u•� jSP ewe VL.r/ws� :%yU!'zv�:
V v�C lC CgtC C C/4+n / 1%4J a✓P r✓r ,f �Yl Pi Jy 7</9? /: h/Cr N,✓rti!
/h; ,aP /✓V. Z site, 1 1-Se L'Vvr•N$
pVP ,/✓%lawn helot 1'ee (t'IC j'/ 4fi/aP/ YJ b;�w a,C has yw0 /Srr%/ru Sr'1<rG'Cind
the fides r!$l.71f voud/ir.ay hri DhP /'d lrJiru L>H/;
k r"t73 Grs✓irJ y'h� 5h4,g�d Gs 4 h,✓sP-s Att2 ,...
jql(! of �'h< :3in P,'1;P. Fr,<q St✓uc i✓ve ,�S erou.r!l } /�
aheua N! / wrr IF•l the piper,
/l•%rB inlet.
9
/Go d%v
CAP
ties- l5ln J,o
peak 'v'a es Weve P�O hV 6,!j Q-� PO6i7 Syr✓C lu YP. The GblLb: v(r. n�
aye wGlr'� /S-44 yu ✓e&5 ywr( SNaw✓. a✓, 7`hP re%llowl:-5 p;sfS,
-giPh sil (IY T'r IHP /"ail 4IrJ .S��P i�J b�l.vb% IJ G"�V ✓(Vl Iisbf VPSY
Abat,T 3(.I ocers were 6om6�al/Pavd 1'4 {,lurp �4 ni/C/<S/u�Jlr+S GC,i✓ri%< .
l
_:..!:._o_. Ay% GJtl, /rYNN I.ILl�y GL V(S U✓'P SU/✓lI9 fd fNC CYJLLNSIOnC '/OGI irN� G✓r�/�Ni//IPIi
�i�-GLY(S d/ )rho fj wick G{l d�Gmd ,(/s Yu,nJ /'rd.o+ SP v.i r/ aLvtg
IS tb YP1V// o' ldn/n.'.rf dl` the lo�slrrr. /riy Y'r S/e/+✓GSf fhua/S fL- ..
.�P/milt✓w•t Cen /✓H+ry.r�G� S=Y/. z'H L4/[u/u 7%in O! ikoo prod- f%iw %�Tris
.. 'For fLrf /O,/ram � �5 �Ps.-• s-�:H PuNei'/SJ sa7 /sJ7l 3P.,-e..rY oil ',.
. fh( .O rPb Y}r4✓Sh ei:! jtn {..e :%t !-.JbJA1 ✓;f Cu�+,fri/r'o-t� Siva»rl0 ar Ipsa�S�..
'..F'ar •/u1 I ellSc4".3e py. SO jilt' br,r .dsL. 11S/r/JP 'Syr..<yu vP1/ i-l.P /a rr.F ..
'f/.w YF'/P$, wt rr GiJe/ir/ 7n15lvwlOO r/P lir..er:n,..3 7AP Pr*
. f/a tv v. fP
u3' a r•f s4/f f� ✓,'..5 r,'.,rP i' ca•-Eva/rr7::r.t, r�;5 rro<.G/P:.,. gr;.✓s
4 f✓» Pz wf L(r5lrrr valve Gm// fn(r(f. ✓P rj foe+<t�v�,r,✓/. Y�Jawi yS Jar
p sG wive, r�
-7:febv,c/bw /
Wai(V SbeJ

0
Worrksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt)
Project 8VAJ"hyuw / . Ah vie BY Dace
Location Checked _ Date _
Circle one. Present Developed
Circle one: To Tc through subarea
NOTES: Space far as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each
worksheec.
Include a map, schematic. or description of flow segments.
Shane flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID
1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............
2. Manning'a roughness coaff., n (cable 3-0 ..
3. Flow length, I (tocal L C 300 ft) .......... ft
4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in
5. land slope, 5 .............................. ft/ft
0.007 Lot)
6c Tt P0.5 0�4 Compute Tt ...... hr
2
Shallow concentrated flow 'Segment ID
7_ Surface description (paved or unpaved) .....
8. Flaw length, I ............................. ft
9. wateraewC]a slope, a ....................... ft/ft
10. Average velocity, Y (figure 3-1) ........... fr/s
11. Tc • 1600 Y compete Tc ...... hr
Channel flow Segment ID
12. Cress sectional flow area, 2
13. wetted perimeter, V. ....................... tc
14, gydriulic radius, r + Compare r ....... ft
p
w
15. Channel slope, a ........................... ft/fa
16. ?tanning's roughness coeff., n ..............
1.49 r2/3 1/2
U. V n s Compute Y ....... We
1g. Flaw length. I ............................. ft
19. Tt . 3600 V compass Tr ...... hr
20. watershed or subarea Tt at Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 1
1
r.wJryl any
o. 8
3a0
3.6
0.Dz,7
/.25 ` - /.25
1, endnd t9)� �. `f�
(210-VI-TR46, Second Ed., June 1986)

Worksheet 2: Runoff curve numher and runoff
Project Ovj(k App rw /U 7 Mao e, By Dace
Location Checked Date
Circle one: Present Developed /o lo
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Sall name
and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrologic condition;
percent impervious;
uneonneeted/connaeted Smpervicus
area ratio)
CN
Area
❑acres
❑ad.2
❑ %
Product
of
CN x area
.v
o
s
4
i
ao
n.
eo
y lip
77
139
loGz6
�
tr/»srJ
¢fy
37
3v�P
1/ Use only one C.4 source per line. Totals
total product �11/Qy
CN (welghced) �Q•� use
CN S/
total araa
2. Runoff
Frequency Yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff, G .............................. in
(Use P and CN with cable 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or aqs. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Scorn I3
Storm /2
Storm 13
4,3
0.2 (210-VI-TR 65, Second Ed., June 198M
'a)/ YySD 373foc-

Worksheet d: Graphical Peak Discharge method
Project 1(p64fb /king k's By Date
Location Checked Date
circle one: Present Developed
L. Data:
Drainage area .......... Am - mil (acres/640)
Runoff curve number .... CN - (From vorksheet 2)
Time of concentration .. Tc - )�_ hr (From varkaheet 3)
Rainfall distribution type - t (1, IA, II, III) -
?and and swamp areas spread
throughout watershed ...... - 3 •® percent of Am (_ acres or m12 covered)
2. Frequency ............................... yr
3. Rainfall, P (24-hour) in
Storm 01
Stora 02
Storm 03
/o
2.s
s•s
6.S
4.
Initial abstraction, Ia .................
in
el
�•IiG
(Use C9 with table 4-1.)
5.
Compute Ia/P ............................
IP55/Ire
6.
Unit peak discharge, qu .................
cam/in
(Use Te and Ia/P with exhibit 4-_)
7.
Runoff, Q ...............................
in
3, v 4,3
a
(From worksheec 2).
a.
Pond and avow adjustment factor, FP ....
O.%5
0, %
(Use percent pond and swamp area
with table 4-2. Factor is 1.0 for
taro percent pond and avamp area.)
9.
Peak discharge, qP •. ....................
efs
(Where qP - quAaQFp)
DD4 (210-VI-TR55, Second Ed., June 19M

Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
Project pV,. 1(✓tu vrh M;Me 411, L By__ Date
Location Checked Dace
Circle oe: Present Developed w 5 - No , Z
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Soil name
and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrologic condition{
percent impervious,
unconneeced/connected impervious
area ratio)
CN
Area
�acsaa
mi-
17 2
Product
of
CX x are
vV
a
a
a
vi
m
I
m
y
D
rurtJ�-il�wvl�/ Gn✓l.y�.w��
F L,j jp r
7�
13,s
/03/
p
FrPesr�
BH
1, y
/3/.l�
1( Us* only one 0 source par line. Totals
C.Y (v<Lgh ted) total product %17/ / _ use CN -
total are 1 4 c ,
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (26-hour) .................. in
Runoff, G .............................. in
(Use P and CN with cable 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or aye. 2-1 and 2-d.)
Storm 01
Stem 02
Scam 02
/0
3.�
s.3`
tq'l
3,2
D3 (216VI-TR,55, Fecund Ed, June 19M

•
•
Work9heet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt)
Project Rv,(k hfv/h /)I, eP Yai BY Dace
Location Checked Date
Circle one: present Developed W
Circle one: T. Tt through subarea
HOMS: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each
workaheec.
Include a map, scheme tic, or description of flaw segments.
near flaw (Applicable to It only) Segment ID
1. Surface da4ripcion (table 3-I) ............
2. Kenning's roughness eoeff., n (table 3-1) ..
J. Plow length, L (total L < 300 ft) .......... ft
A. No-yr 26-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in
5. land slope, a .............................. ft/ft
6.._ It - 0.307 (nL0)0.9 Compute It ...... hr
P2 a
Shallow concentrated flow Segment I➢
7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) .....
S. Flow length, L ............................. ft
9. Watercourse slope, a ....................... ft/ft
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/3
11. It ' I600 V Compute Tt ...... he
Channel flow Segment ID
12. Crams sectional flow area, a ............... ft2
11. Wacced parimater, pw ....................... ft
16. Hydraulic radius, r - V Compete r ....... ft
w
15. Channel elope, a ........................... ft/ft
16. Manning's roughness toeff., n ..............
L69 r213 112
l7. Y Compute Lch
e
13. Plata length, L ............................. ft
19. It ` 3600 Y Comport It ...... hr
20. Watershed or subs rat I or I (add I in steps 6, 1
D.
Sod
3.k
O.O/7 I
2_ 3
jln rrr� e I
500 t-p
o.0 O.O36
O.ay + 0.03 a O.OQ
1, and(9)"+" I. SCf
(210.VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 19M

Worksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method
Project �v,o(AO�40 /VO, % 8y Date
Location Checked Date
Circle one: Present Developed iT/5' AA, - 2-
1. Data:
Drainage area .......... - 910 23 3 m12 (acres/640)
Runoff curve number .... CN - II%q (From worksheet 2)
Time of concentration ., It - f • S9 hr (From vorksheet 3)
Rainfall distribution type - (I, LA,'II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread
throughout watershed .. .... - .j V percent of Am (_ acres or mil covered)
2. Frequency ...............................
3. Rainfall, P (24-hour) ...................
4. Initial abstraction, I .................
(Use CN with table 4-1.)
3. Compute Ia/P ............................
yr
in
Storm J1
Storm #2
1 Storm 03
in 1 0,$32 0,532
Ir551 O.i
6.
Unit peak discharge, qn .................
csm/Sn
'z
-
(Use Tc and Ia/P with exhibit 4 --Y—)
_ 7.
Runoff, Q ...............................
in
2-,1
(From worksheet 2).
8.
Pond and swamp adjustment factor, Pp ....
O, % S1
0' 7S
(Use percent pond and swamp area
with table 4-2. Factor in 1.0 for
term percent pond and swamp area.)
9.
Peak discharge,
qp ......................
efs
(Where qP - q,kMQFp)
D-4
C210-VI-TES6, Semnd
Ed., June
19M

•
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
Project &;Oeku✓Ah Nl, 2IM'k7 P By_ Date
Location Checked Date
Circle one. Present Developed {'�,� Pe .
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Soil name
and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrologic condition;
percent impervious;
unconnected/connected Smpervtom
area tacit
CN
Area
❑mi-
Product
of
CN a area
T=a
'I❑ages
Cis❑z
a,
k1dod
7J
7,S
57>,5
Fxpe6 rd
9q
o.'?
�S,g
1/ Use only one 0 source per line. Tocals
0 (weighted) - coin product IPii 33 7gg S Use CN
total area - T 2-
,
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff. Q ....... I............ I......... in
(Use P and C! with cable 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs. 2-1 and 2-4.)
Store 01
Storm 02
Stom 07
2
io
25
3 . z
4,1
D2 (214VI-TR 55, Second Ed., dune 19M

0 •
Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt)
Project 19w:<k hw VI M P lM, N By Date
Location Checked_ Data
Circle one: Present Developed 3
Circle one: To Tt through subarea
HOTLS: Space for as many as two segment* per flow type can be used for each
work*heat.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments.
Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment
U
1.
Surface description (table ]-1) ............
2.
manning's roughness staff., n (table ]-1) ..
].
Flow length, L (total L < 300 ft) ..........
ft
4.
Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 ..................
In
3.
land slope, s .............. 6...............
fc/fc
6:
0.007 '(nL)0.8
Tt Compute Tt ,.....
hr
P 0. *0.4
2
Shall" concentrated flaw Segment
ID
7.
Surface description (paved or unpaved) .....
B.
Flow length. L .............................
ft
9.
Watercourse slope, a .......................
ft/ft
10.
Average velocity, V (figure ]-1) ...........
ft/3
11.
Tt. 3600 V Compute Tt ......
hr
0, fro
30d
3, &
e;2, 0)7
�ZS + r/i2
2
O.o 4 y
Channel flow Segment ID
12. Croce sectional flow area, a ............... itl
13. Vatted perimeter, pw ....................... ft
14. Hydraulic radius, r - --I Coeburn r ....... ft
w
15. Channel slope, 6 ........................... Wit
16. Meaning's roughnass coeff., n ..............
t As 9 r2/] 1/2
P. Y o Compute Y ....... We
18. Flow length, L ............................. ft
19. Tt ' 0600 Y CmmPute Tt ...... hr +
2C. Watershed or sum rea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 193 ....... by it
(230M-TR-55, Second Ed., June 19M

Worksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method
Project lei✓i c k {rtwrN /{ir, 7 /16; aP By _ Date
Location /,Checked Date
Circle one: Present Developed W 5 IZ4 Z
1. Data:
Drainage area .......... Am - O10 12.8 m12 (acres/640)
Runoff curve number .... CH - '�'9 (From worksheet 2)
Time of concentration .. Tc ' / Z 4 hr (Pram worksheet 3)
Rainfall distribution type 1Z (I, IA, II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread
throughout watershed ...... a3. C] percent of Am (_ acres or m12 covered)
2. Frequency ...............................
3. Rainfall, P (24-hour) ...................
4. Initial abstraction, La .................
(Use Ce with table 4-1.)
5.Compute Ia/P ............................
yr
in
Stamm 01
Stota 02
from +3
in 0.53 ,? O.SJ 2
/PSS ib O. I
6.
Unit peak discharge, q I ................
csm/in
3 0
3 o a
(Uae T. and Ta/P with umhibic 4-,.Y.)
7.
Runoff, Q ...............................
in
3 — ! .
(From worksheet 2).
S.
Pond and swamp adjustment factor, Fp ....
�• 7 S
0• �/,
(Uae percent pond and swamp area
with cable 4-2, Factor is 1.0 Ear
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
9.
Peak discharge, qp ......................
cfa
/�
1,
('where qP - quAmQFP)
D4
MMVI-TR-55, Second
Ed., June
19861

/ /OW/�/ Gl/G IpG�[�Vf
Fallow ove itie iYoSs-SPcyn�=/ skP�chaf fog 7L;P
5 /laad>vy_loa/
pppamoL P P--- —__—
B iPca.rPao., —�iw-/s'�croPJ y� ZI'iti%cE
S%S (w.Ck ISM. hs
I ' mi,iK m%n.
.. ....... .
o Check �a r7
. 4r•Stti,f cMroPJ„n-Sdr --
DOhPP OaU IP Q'1,
r
ql 1 a do a v UpdP 000 2,5 tb,�k r"%n
O� `d ao c7°D oflRoop°po ...

n
r
PROJECT: ,><ia.C+7 N, Z M• we DESIGNER T�j!
DATE:
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
STATI ON
AHW-
01 = TWI =
0E = TWE =
TW
EL 0 SO, C; i --rD T
EL_1
/ 01 • DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY OEy
MEAN STREAM VELOCITY=�
` aEI CHECK DISCHARGE, SAY 0SOOR DIDO
MAfL STREAM VELOCITY=_
CULVERT
HEADWATER COMPUTATION
H'
INLETCONT.
. OUTLET CONTROL HW=H +Iy-LSD
OESORIPTIOM
O
Sizr
j><
Itp-o
ut
COST
COMMENTS
u
HW
ICG
H
dC
4 b
TW
AD
LSD
HW
IENTRANCE TYPE)
5
B j
2
3
0, ry
I.I I
046,
D,ys
1.24
.
If
1.4)/
l,3A
•2
bA
Lo3
S
113
/.63
/,Y
0,
1A
/X
?,6
SUMMARY 9 RECOMMENDATIONS: L
X!u? I° fJ✓'au14Hr•INP�.W.r7f
/1LJfr; t,4w/vfiGw5
•

ioW c,p,t;jy c4A(fAuV5 Fcv- bur/Pt Sr �r�u•rS
V ��,- Mast 419S�ap C' V'o4/yw4V1 -lS ',Oln C/N P,
TsvD:..li-�C/s1l�S t/re fh�uk�n ftiP ✓'oarQu.al// f"hP foo o'F'
VOajwy i�S vApr°y 2.5'Ff aj,r �je
✓a/„ai%oN afskn P// {.-o u!/we/
7r - rooe&o` rr A I r
OliP �'!"/P[v P�P/Vif/.H ?ISD GSSuir, /G /S r/. /
ZFi h;5h C6 n[k r/a..i tom/ /fie J- 4vP G- 4 Wr civci%a TAO
vrwate LI_NPQ / .�• ..
�vw ua'�a h-- 2�/j � cvlv•�/5 4Ve �y ✓au<<� LhLe,
r'OO�wG�.
o,00.Sff/Ft. Fo/%�..:�5 !s .r4,«.�4�yJJf' Qvs Hw dvprh. ,Fol%H!!�iS
Ay5 Scow Go%k/u ilf' 5•
20
1r�+'
15 _
FavrR ie / C��/.ul
{t�S
Fv� TWO Of
U�u CoY, /xP.T..I P-pP
7S' /arog 5/upP' � 0.0°6fjl
Z 3 y S G

OCHART
2
60
a.0oo
168
6,000
EXAMPLE
Ili
136
6,000
E•161n. b. O.0 1.•q
],000
DaB m
(})
4♦
4,000
B
S.
8
132
3000
n
0 I... I
J
III I.• 3.4
120
2,000
108
U
4.
3.
Boo
3.1
94 0
Boo
E00
B
TZ
400
300
60 L
U
200
IA
L5
a
],
i
w
IUD
/
i
ae
rc
80
c
a_
u
60
r'O/
0
42
.m
0
DO
%
°o
'
L0
a
16
30
MW TRAIN
a
—
a
33
SG LE
TY
W
20
o
m
c
.B
6
30
121
<
13
..
Z
.6
V
1
al n..l .B
6
.1
T
24
''
0,65
_ 21
• Ixl .. @I Project
q
211
11,14h,
• n�. .1. . ..
.6
.6
3
D0.4 ob. .........
8
16
anon.
5
III` L0 .3
f
12 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
C. M. PIPE CULVERTS
WPE•D D..D.2.lEBD.D,,..,, b„ WITH INLET CONTROL {q
1
182

101
�!
1
1'.
s
II
CHART 6
1000
eoo
10
N _
w6.rt.a0 omcc*ua.vma r n6c vu
6D0
120
500
109
by
..aa.. ....,.r. . .a. ra.....
it ...
s00
96
300
6.
D i
P�
7 O
i2
O.l
200
66
cA
Boo
t
.6
6D
—
•S
60
a
50
0
36
.0
W
33
_0-3
30
W
F
30
o
o
it
20
2a
z1
a
Do6� o aeuc ro.03 r.. 19e3
186
Y
100
O,(o�
33.E
0
HEAD FOR
STANDARD
C. M. PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.024

1--� J+
I ME Era—t
PEETI
-J
I
RANGE ova
I i
L
� a .1.00
0.4 0
to 090
L---
.—
, '—
if
i
1 1
1
1
E 7i_AR T 5763
_j
F
RANGE 0 at, 040 TO OSO
CY cc
30 40 50 60 70 90 90 100
(TSC4AR5E-0-CFS
8
7
too 200 no 400 500 GOO 700 800 900 1000
CISCHAPGE-0 CFS
0
6 RANGE OF CA 0 TO 090
1.00
LIL —
0 1010 2000 5000 4000
DISCHARGE-0-CFS
CIRCULAR PIPE
CRITICAL DEPTH
59 '

5'1
os
Ooa
o_c .�
't7 = �rV —j h� -7 d e✓t rld �; -.rr /� r,C.4
z4� /'fi �,�/ l,Lt��it� i7✓1 ✓]ea"11- 0/ ��1�1 '�fo�� •7di � ��^��10� ft(� � �.� vl.G� i�l�
/1 1
�� ~� �' era S' -H �T s+ ��,✓�a�( -+ �/) �� Jts yf`!O o .t d L l( S� C, ' Z' a /1
IL (2 0/ 4
/�i�d`g

E
c di
� /1�
Foe Ql4 H.f /oCr re)&tvw.u/ - �-/�!!/Jr'./ t�.lvli.. �lO HO JJ "rL /C G%+/c .�r✓Y rYJ
Tip SyP" Lo✓1.'5/d !���i.f
Vou$h a i.c0,)�4!/ TGor r'S l/i�pvo Xi.,L.•r,ra/� Lft
f�/fVli/✓! /'1 /!Ll�HVIvIr ��HrC.0 Cif Jf /IUI.Y /N SAirj/ OT
f�a>,!— GlH�( r$ vYic<Opr of [r.lw of avr� c./51° /� 3•S �i oL. ve
Colv.�Y rh/r 7`' J-bP o-,�edw ry [rrs>r r, IP%I/ a,af ��Jr'...H fr j
7tio pock f/ow4IJ, C/LP •Ci.rn A41e%S!r/C✓
� Cu/vPV �- Eirr,/ani/oe�- F+,F ly„d cJoi� .'s Doff t.
h 5/4/%° or Or Al Fp//cwr�� ri ioixJnJ./
NlQr/wrr i•�' �i/J/ y / �.'L

I
co
u
PROJECT: c%(
y`�r+7 A�, 2
DESWINER 152S
DATE:
HYDROLOGIC AND
CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
STATION
EL
AHW= �, a
TWI
QQ ;
TWY =
TW
EL
01 DESIGN DISCHARGE
, SAY 025
1
EL-2
MEAN STREAM VELOC4TY=
QE = CmECK DISCHARGE,
SAY 050 OR 0100
J
IWAX- STREAM VELOCITY=
CULVERT
HEADWATER
COMPUTATION
INLET CONT
- OUTLET -CONTROL Hw:--zH + ho —LSO
DESCRIPTiON
O
SIZE
-' #
F r
�0
0
COST
COMMENTS
D
Hw
FCC
H
d`
TW
ho
LSO
HW
[ENTRANCE TYK]
3
>
2
U
1�
I,o2
1,53
11,3
r3
6,
2y
l0
j,7
,.5g
35
p,tf
r/,i6
1 Z
3 38
3.5 �
u, �
�, 3
1. y
1.
o,U
5,
SUMMARY A RECOMMENDATION
/
6Il,o fa &y, C�rv+�nPr Iv (/�y

OCHART 2
' /r/r--IsoT Flo,aaa
166 8.000 EXAMPLE
I56 6,000 0• 16 l nho, Ixa N.n
`- ii
BURCAu Of OVBL.0 ROAO B JAM, 1B44
(2)
e.
(3)
R.
L .!
HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
C. M. PIPE CULVERTS
WITH INLET CONTROL
�$2 Ott
JQ

f',...
O CHART
6
'I
2000
soo
soa
1
20
500
109
400
96
500
0<
tl
T2
_200
litI1
1
66
60
;lit
LL
V
59
100
W
It
♦6
e0
w
`
z
60
Z
Y
S
50
0
36
40
33
II
_w
30
w
30
0
29
20
i
24
6°.0u 0r wee¢ ,a�03 r iw3
ws.�n¢0 0an6r •Cm6�r.w.a.° FULL /
o : /
P� o
e
OJ / (ery
bV� l i
196
o lwl�
2 2ro�
' 3.Z
20
HEAD FOR
STANDARD
C. M. PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.024

El A =R� 6)
II
o
I NANG E OF n�j 0 4 0 T 0 09 0 1
r a 1 00
0.7
a I Tp
4&vct?_ 20 10 <0 so 50 70 so 90 100
pl� I
77
IT
-I
,
T
)AE TER
F Ile_
Rt4mGE OF A - 040
a - 1.00
TO
01
L
5 1-
0 too 200 300 400 500 600 -000 L
DISCHARGE-0 CFS
RANGE OF
0 TO
0,90
IT
1000 2000 3000 4000
O[SCHARGE-0-CFS
CIRCULAR PIPE
CRITICAL DEPTH
69 1

•
3
I
I
ul—_—
r - 1.00 1
- t-
-
__
0 80 90 100
DISCHARGE - a -CFS
I
I I I
i
I
r
01
r�OLtMFTEB_—L
_
IN VFFT
pnNGE
OF ar060 TO 0.90
/
6 0
w
0
J
_00 ZOO 400 500 600 700 800 900 ;000 2
DISCHARGE -0-CFS
cr
r
I
a�
040
0
090
CISGHd RGE-0 -Gf5 "ov 4000
CIRCULAR PIPE
CRITICAL DEPTH
69"
.= 4

d4r�7 r!.`a%G/
�'CJTi , IJ�r6C �G rs e' G 147 ✓r'-
�
° n 5 N.. 1 /u w a L a lC a /a Jr'r, W,/ C 17, `g Le/4 c L, Av oa AV TO
GVPf'1.
��fp t ' }'� Ala j •`, ;? « �7
Ft
0 .ol 2.900
Z
Ll . 6 2-
5
o l o,u3 2,4 "0 8 .56 3,6s OAS �3 Cv/Lf4J'cON /�
.7 e , doe In,L-e -t,A,-1e -/- � � i /O CIPp147 J7i'�
�y �Ju�/!,/i► �ial'� �. /Yix�[/lt�o/// �r�
/Y iir / 0�4 NS ,�%/1N I vI �Pr•/'/,fG �iI .
G��1 FSTirYIRfPII A.om
%r5t�►^P
�t! �a7 �I �G d 1'/`tOS�/%i
pPpfh UPS %e
0, z p,0025
z.570
2.0,0
0,4 010050
3-005-
S 7.0
0 . p, 0 0 7S
3, o2-5`
/oS.S
O0
/L2,4
;O d,a[��
3.�3�
2�7,
�, 2 D,Q150
:2 -2
lv,o P ; d,PDI� a�uvr_ eVIV,.�V,V-f 5 P'.zl11 tD d,p k � 4-pT

PERCENT SUBMERGENCE DIN x 100
76 ]e e0 e2 64 86 0a 90 92 94
I I I
I. C
OVERALL 0•CI LNS'r. EVC1
0 -07
3.06
0
306
L
304
3. oz3001
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I -- 0.6
014 0.16 01e 020. 0.22 0.24 0.26 0,28 0.30
—
H�I
106
0.5
3e4
302
i 3A0
2.99 NOTE+ USE THIS CURVE FOR FREE FLOW
COEFFICIENTS WITH Hq RATIOS 4015.
z96
z,93 0.4
xy4r
y 'z 2.92j-z
2 ya6e 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
�4
40OASr2 Ib 2A 2.4 28 3.2 as 40
5
�O,( Q,f$ HEAR ON ROADWAY HIN FEET
0.3
Fipurn 24.—DI,charge cocfficicna for flow n.v rnadwmr embank men d.
port, Me., on Interscatn 70, A profile neress the throughout. This is the ideal valley cross section
valley looking upstream is shown on figure 25. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well above high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement will accom-
embankment on the Inft is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur with s mini -
food level, yet there is adequate. Sight distance mum of damage. Computation of flow across this
46

n. L
PERCENT SuflmERGENCE 0/H x 100
f 76 78 80 82 84 86 89 90 92 94 96 98 100
I I LO
C
__________
Mn
L o
OVERALL 0•f.1LHyZ,C;/CI
310
0` J
C
i 3.08
J 3pG
0
0
x 3.04
u 3.C2 6
3DC I
0.6
' 014 0.16 0.18 0,20 0.22 0.24 DEG 0.28 0.3C
H�[
n ..
06
OD
7
J 2,96 NOTE. USE THIS CURVE FOR FREE FLOW
1p Mom$ OEFFICIENT$WITH N/(RA rns f C 15.
1 1 $ 1 1 1 1
1J
+� 12 l6 24 24 23.2 3.6 90
HEAD ON RO4bNAT H IN FEET
Figu r 24.—Di.chn.pe na P,Ic,Ln Aw flow wer rondwny rmbankmmin
port, Mo., on Intestate 70. A profile :erom the throughout. Thin IS thr. ideal vnlley areas section
1III valley looking upstream is Shown nn figure 25- The And the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well above. high water, the Approach made to fit the Rite. The arrangement will accom-
embankment on the left is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur with a mini -
flood level, yet there 1.s adequate night distance mum of damage. Computation of flow across this
M

360
J S'�
2.00
Tvia I q«.
J50
/cb
y-o
lJ r'/aw ,•n 1 of �:y�• mania/ ;:.�' 'i--;'g r�"Sloty� ;J�
I ASS �l/4 ✓I �, V i� ��C / ^.� C7�LICU%N1 /�N %irl J �If%r � �}^J
Gr,� fo l/re `/j�•, �•�� 'i('rr1%cr�r' cr:; tar;,/s i/�,.�.. �6�� ,/
11.5 F1 �S t%7 .e Yoad���/ tS UiP.. �e�0 r.� oh..✓r/<.a i5 G�r-4�=rf,
1 r/ be rcedw.,./ .r.9�f/�✓. F�. iC �r a'�,- 1; rr -�:a
ylL- =u'�s �. f o�,:l •.�^ 1 5--�svL yu:rr P✓<:r' h;,.
3S 3,>S 0 4,25- 4.5'o y->S so 5..
/]ewda. VP� do,.fh,fft

u
s,S s 5•m ti
I r L OO/
051
,7T �F.S_�f/��/�s�e''i�.aJi
'in✓�, :)/ —lv� "o``df, a,/:
�/)O`� �o �o/[� Sr M��d&
8•I �i
)h L
g'hhl
Oha'E
is .I
Z,�
I 'S � i
_Ss�'�
I•�'G
l'1
g'is r
ss0 £
Oc0�
r'8o/
OFO'�-
�sf
'7
/ h y;ddr;
w C,/N '.4,
.a
: t7 61�
y U •u:f.
-e:� > aHF -tQs
i,�f7 s• Wfo�J�:d�7
d41 '�dlF^O �r�nJ�l�

0 •
PERCENT SUHMERGENCE D/R a 100
76 78 80 a2 84 86 e8 90 92 94 as 98 IDD
In
ilH h
C
OVERALL O•Cf LHUZC�61
110 07
i 3A8
07 106
O
III x 104
n Ice B i
3D 014 0.% 0.18 020 0.22 024 026 0.26 030 0,6
3 300
Lee NOTE: USE THIS CURVE FOR FREE FLOW
p CCEFFCIENFS WFIN H/JRATIGS(015.
z 2%
294
292 A
290 II t I I I I I I
0 04 ale `2 16 W 24 28 32 16 40
HEAD ON FCAOWAY H IN FEET
Figure 24.—fll.e6araA coemeieme for now over roadway emLenkmenle.
port, Mo., on Interstate 70. A profile across the throughout. This is the ideal valley cross Section
valley looking upstream is shown on figure 25. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well above high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement will accom-
embankment on the left is het at about the 75-year mociate any flood that is likely to occur with a mini -
flood level, yet thrm is adequate .might distance mum of damage. Computation of flow across this
46

Td r vulUu Sf `l;-r
1•' uc/� Cl C � A�:L//� up of !'✓[x/e-PS
Cvu/d�fE VP/oCr.%� Uw(% U✓9J':, eh r/e,:.,5/pe s,.ic o7C � _... r .�o +r'r
NISJ/P!.:ri..a'/.: ,. J/ uf" ���iS� WLIi/9CuIu. �Gc.•7re/„ TIJc✓
'aut r>c o�r•'r,vvr'•5 .:r..T rco✓r of s,••;; aftt��, Of,.� n�i.
G %f Pc Ir pow/'
• l o� urs/oar y�.d+...>� w.Y� z-/s ',S cn:ds; yip .,,.>f.-,:.:r
f`/u.v v.. f� GoaY�a///V' h� GL/c/r r%a wr /S /o•L' i7j/:� 1 f l�u wv/��p��
n /s
d - O, o b 2 {?
/ d•ay' r�
_w"rl tAe waives r� JvSf Yo�J� /n over fu/Yj /hP rOG/%W'A
GVPh jHp CrFdJ L� /_
3,v
lbw. r./ Y &sI L. 4pe.k r.'o-; J. n>I'f Ioai Gn:-c/;i:,,
�r $� p-�=0ol
BS�I
J

' 4� �,-., iG ,r•. ,.x
�• _77
- — '�" /1ram
— ,0
• Fe✓ Po.rfwl�
,ter 1:; ,;�'
., w.
_ i.r .i
�L
-d
lid
�!
_
J
-..
—dr
..
lad
! f_ 9, 7j
3= G llp -Ft
%s7
Odre�S ��
B �cfS., •... _
did
Oz
3 3-. 2
0.
rn 56+'++rnor�/ 96W' f::... •hp'n /= c. �.i.' l • fAe U - rs�
!! ry�L A� Moti
It'i �,the ..
E
Je Of- -/br /6 If AJ Id h..f„'.;, /I,e np.s.r ,,..... �. c<«rl. /:,,�, .,-F n. )�S fY d✓r>�+

79c)
:r,
-7 C P
3, q 13
[A,- -bp
S/E)P"O- ci CAO I.- Y),5 /V .0.) — t
-7L,
dr4

�I
I.
�/9h�s. dro sF,.��o� -.�o ?®o�sd✓ii'w-�—/���
• ij
I
..
'
I
.--_.____..__
._.__.
.-
SII
- - - R
..__.___..-.._.. .... -_.. .. ._..... _.__...__. .. ........__...-_..._..-_.___.-.__..___.,L_._-_
i

_��/E n/US F c�a.PY y2._.f..l.Y.A4'^.:__ C c»c:�.. (.YO. %Y%-. ./lu_✓, •.•
IISU.-.�i.[�
�✓am .,rl:C j�_rci—_s�f .�i'�._��✓fh�__1=/U� _
i
r _
14 vr45 f /4P Yn&[%wnf /e 5/ P u-A m.d, 4
rf,'.,a fa P, �ow✓/s/� ic/r_: � the-. ctia,��urr�,
--
I
cu/w� g v;1J br .�3 Sfi js.. w;th Nw= 41,z 5f F/uw
----
100
....---- ._ .. __-. _... ------ — -- - — --
i i
'I
it

ear, t
f ;-T I I
vc
--------- -
Li
Fo ;ej
-FZ,15
- - --------- ......
--JCr 07C
�73� .......
1
el—
Fp
F7

Ij
ve
Flv� 6P
li
-- ---------
e, 7 r/ a Jj
6/110

<rJl � 5
GI 1 �N `�. O lC % ✓! e. .
hWl� [ 1 �L �P i5 �. d2l �7t` ¢'n � %/'H rya/ 1/►�,� th u�' ��.�c �� c 1� /� ,�dr'.rwi
IS �f 2! 7' • � Is [ 4 v r'
al,?/v 4'{r of l�/�$ /r/i,�. /ou. aY Ca/cam/T1/��/
Ca&V-),.Yre1 16 C�Iyr L.7� �.✓�OrC f f/ G 5 frJV St/!IIS�!b,f i.. fl 070CV/f
L.-''F
C/ f ©S G r o./ 2 ,W L f ! ��71:51 �/ ••
s- N/�:
Of 1 J Qro �,y50 l �. I �. Q ' Cpr{O �Glvp�! CU�af✓u/J
.1/olC; Repculv/,t iv1v�-.� i j.'$c�clul: fD OIp�h� off
ROadk oy
h'-pi � to$lye
O,1
0.001
q.2 5-
6 , 2
6,003
2.S70
��•�
0..4
0-005
3.065
0 • �
Q.00�
3.oz5
/C�O.�
0,13
o,ar/
1,030
2 /6.g
!. 0
0.0r3
3, a35
30 3f5-

,'� ham_ �. �lq,�elrrl✓;y bv;....'1 _ ❑ j<.,4
it
PERCENT SUBMISMENCH 0/H x Io0
Ih
Hs
1 0
11_
'nr>�irrrsz
OVERALL 0-CI Lh'o.Q/C,
110 D7
i 3,06
306
z 30i
lox B z
jo
1, 3.00o19 0.5 0.16 0.2o O.ZZ 0.24 0.26 0.20 ow
0.6
H/1
j
306
0.3
304
302
i 900
Or ase NOTE: USE THIS CURVE FOR FREE FIDW
— 6CfFF1eIENTS WITH H/f RATIOS(015.
2.%
z, a<
2ne
a
�y� I
oY a as tz is zc x.e znz 36 ao
�!•5101Q'fS HEAD ON fl04pWAYNIN FEET
c3
Figure l I.—DLwhnrge oeMcinn" for Bow over roadway embankmenia.
port, Mo., on Interstate 70. A profile across the throughout. This is the ideal valley croes'section
valley looking upstream is shown on figure 26. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well above high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement will accom-
embankment on the left is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur with a
mini -flood level, yet there is adequate sight distance mum of damage. Computation of flow scrow this
46

-
�fr)5
i� �o✓/°I DuG%�✓w� w1�17 GrhS f� d I COi'{'
PERCENT SUBMERGENCE C/H % 100
76 78 80 82 64 86 Se 90 92 94 96 98
C
Hh
1L_ _ o _1
OVERALL 041LHy2O%/CI
a10 0.7 J
i 3.08 rc
0
� 306 �
0
ao4 �
u am
80C46
14 GIs 018 020 0.22 C24 0.26 0.28 am
H�
UJj
15W / I I NOTE COE FICENTB VWITH Hr[RATgLANE IS CURE FOR MEE 5015.
A
C) 12 1.6 2A 24 20 32 86 40
HEAD ON ROADWAY H IN FEET
Figure 2A.—Di ch,rge ctm ficicnta to, How a.er randway cmbankmenus
port, Mo., on Interstate 70. A profile across the throughout. This is the ideal valley cross section
valley looking upstream is shown on figure 25. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well above high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement will accom-
emhankment on the left is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur with a mini -
food level, yet there is adequate .sight distance mum of damage. Computation of flow across this
rW.

' � 0
al
u l� __-1__L_YPS.[-_�%_!.y %"Co'(f?uli;Y� ✓-; iZr
__...�..__
"p'�' CUwfy<,.L(P .ln. C.. �u!_ _o �� _��` 7fv.aas_5•ij/g L: ,i /:Ir `Ii�
PV' Uy/< /OS ��.•Ru 5 5 CJ OT- �i-o5rp�
ja
�
Si �( q'(l i t' YbbJwNl J jwr� fn f �j e c ✓'/s/ G � �/ou•/*r���`__
of / cK CGr cE t�ov�-r 1-I+e P oc FJ��.G' ®rscy•br� r.7
/(rVY v/1!r•cGra Gi/ C�iv y�f�r.-�� fqi'� y. ✓�•r.//n. J'+.�/viu�
S = Cosa- tuoO
C/LtG)��N�}S!„�
/h = e, 4y� �i5 `/3
O
r:
x�
---........

I
�'S
�II Fdr -/1.Ppa_i4P
c!o:o:r;
iTN?_G'j q/'- G_rrt//o�r.rtf
93
3,
- 31
o
c••,aVn �6:05-�. Tot^- /�:- —%-�_ 0 9 +.r.T^�!.>r
Mean Stone Size dye, ft
��ineo
■ln:■
��iii
��ii■iiiii�Ciiil'
=own
Mean Stone Size, dso, man
Figure tl.g5q AngIa of repose for different rock shapes and sizes.
I ^
C__
�:.0 /4_•. L.!.v_. ri !_ _..W l/l Q ... ...
___.—
—__f_<�—._
3 Li
- -
--
- , -F+

i
¢ CfA/i ._c<:!Al,
--- �� _✓oad:�,. w,'Ty /6_ �l cM!'-------`t=10,3f._55,1(h
�%Y e i/OP s JCCL
n
iiC/rO/7.N'�'a-_ dn-%.NL'i._,q _J__1__L-_�✓rC =Lie v //l_�Z�:
I
_�-..__USo�YIP/IrQ
JJJ
6- �•GS
G, - O CPI v.'� �Ir/F__.` /J Y.. �. �j/ Z.L F/•`L_ 1 ! Z
I
GF w- 1
.I �., r cto _, r/,,, pv c,_. �Y' y c O•vrt�'-f.

c :
i
-�'i---
J7"C/— ( Sz•Q/
�,�� � �
(A�
1,
l
2 ,. :;l id LS'^:O �t9
�/.�•�S ,j:o .mot ,.1
01
_ S 'i
•
� r

n
i
FV�Iu4rF DUildl JI /Llicvr �yV `CL�L'r i. j/S O'r /.� (J-/PffL-
- �S�l—GNr� few V /P L�•�/ ham 13, 25
—�N �Y' .CY/L/L/5.4 N�..._U l �f iP�. Ov PO(�_[ b/✓��_—_
II
✓lW .r GN.1I/i,

F-1) /MZF/V/ SlAl h:-(/IIL6111TIOAX
7bp
a .Py3 7' �b /0-
pV
Ac Lr5
----------- — -----
99
o'01( 1 146 7) = A 7 4 t P, -5 � 0, /ter
------ ----
-- ---------
... ..........

REQUEST FOR T NFORMAT 2 ON
Name and address of person requesting information:
zgr . C 11:74�
,c1q>6 �a. SSA-�G3a
-C3-g �-
Information to be sent (check all that apply):
❑ Business Card
❑ Mining Act of 1971
❑ Administrative Rules -
❑ Application Form
❑ ,Mining Brochure
❑ Guidelines on Reclamation Bonds
❑ Assignment of Savings Account Form
❑ Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit Form
❑ Surety Bond Form
❑ Renewal Checklist
❑ Modification Checklist
❑ Transfer Checklist
Lm7 Other:
Vb, a
* Susan - After sending the above.information:
❑ PLEASE FILE THIS FORM UNDER REQUESTS FOR
INFORMATION
❑ PLEASE FILE THIS 'FORM IN THE MINE FILE (PERMIT
NO. )
Tha s,

North Carolina Department of Environment. Heath, an
Division of land Resources, Lard Quay
I
Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
I' (PERMTED MNE)
1. MINE NAME t ckhov -4a 2.
3. OPERATOR 1
5. ADDRESS i U 6. PERMI
,W 2 7 IM
MCQ0 I
7. Person(s) contacted at site Woks in Gr''e,onP -733L)
8. Was mine operating at time of in�ction? 9jes ❑ No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes too
10. Date last inspected:k/�l3 11. Any mining since last inspection? es ❑ No
12. Is the mine In compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
II no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in olfsite damage? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
NIA
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
16. Other recommendations and comments:. U -
moii"14-oi 1 SPiinKo?f qf)n-A�1l 64 xto
1
F .
:N31n . .5P4 ingrur�
an754-hrkpilr. Qren. QS (JAD 5 d
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? Yes El NO (Explain) ❑Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑Yes *0 Proposed date I I_ p
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report. 20. Copy of Report sent to,oper�attor M72-7aL-1
INSPECTED BY, ,( �..Q.1 f; l Q ` Q 1 �llt Q_i DATE / y1 I te)
Phone No: (q ( ) g2 I _
White copy to file yellow copy to operator Pint copy to Mining Specialisr
991
�'r� �0f1NR -

W

J
0
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, land Ouality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINA
(� pp
1. MINE NAME Rrlgkbe1UPil A-2 //�� 2. MINING PERMIT# I`i-6
3. OPERATOR ChrrnkPr. `ibnl., (-iYTT 1(1 Tn0.. 4. COUNTY 4•hlrn
5. ADDRESS 1"Ci) r ,ihyi Rd. Z3 � d/l Alr'. � 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE P, 4n J:
7. Person(s) contacted at site lnielki 0 1 1
8. Was mine operating at time of inspection? Eyes ❑ No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes Q'No
10. Date Iasi inspected: /_AnL/q2 11. Any mining since last inspection? R Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑No
If no, explain: R E n rIC I Vc. [ D
'L
ig-
LAND QUALITY SECTION
13. Is the mine In compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? N es ❑ No
It no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oflshe damage? ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
NIA
r
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: Hr� rttivl+ 44 Pe rs 01 o 11 P I / Iwit: r+C
011A nrh,S4 rinn;nr rll ninnno„R.l nt'P. in (tllrl 4I"YJrIP..
WPr Pn4- 4PP/lint-r li:I (K -qi 4lr1nP. Oil eir4-4tp tt4._t
Itlr)IA4 oc-t-)d,
J I J
16. Other recommendations and comments: 4 ,n � ? I r n j +e) ; S i Pin
(.ra•14ifl n9POCtirp+ (1C 1'PP a',.F
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? .2kYes ❑No (Explain) ❑Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑Yes [NNo Proposed dale_/_I
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Repod 0 . 20. Copy of Report sent to operator (,
�� 17 l�l)iYlk' DATE � / _'f /9�date)
INSPECTED BV: !_) (P
Phone No: (q 14 ) Kri I - 14'l()n
While copy to file YelbW copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
"i
AID %
le

t

AA1[; y `16aa` "O O 4t
. *Ok elp
State of North Carolina 111)k
Department of Environment, Health, and Naturals A-C�urces
Raleigh Regional Office 4/
1�
James G. Martin, Governor DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
Edmond John Maguire
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary October 29, 1992 Regional Manager
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 458
Sanford, NC 27330
ATTN: John Burns
RE: Brickhaven #2
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Burns:
This is to acknowledge our acceptance of the erosion and
sedimentation control system evaluation submitted by Pat
Shillington and received in this office on September 23, 1992. We
have reviewed the information and have found it to be acceptable.
Each of the general specifications (1-6) listed on pages 5 and 6 of
the summary report must be implemented by January 1, 1993, subject
to the following stipulations:
(1) The lateral extension of brickbat protection from the
downstream toe of the roadway slopes as described in
general specifications 3 and 4 must be at least 6 feet.
(2) In accordance with our previous report, sediment pits
with brickbat filter outlets must be provided at all on -
site drainage structures and ditch outlets to the
watercourse through the site. The basins/structures
within the watercourse (evaluated in the report by
Mr. Shillington) must not be used as primary sediment
control devices (note that the current approved plan
calls for no mining activity in the immediate vicinity
of this watercourse).
Please be advised that your current disturbance in very close
to the limits established in your original approval. Please refer
to the attached copy of the applicable section from your original
maps, and make sure that you do not exceed the limitations without
first obtaining our approval of a revised erosion and
sedimentation control plan detailing all necessary measures to
accommodate the expansion.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 0 Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Telephone [phone] • 1=AX Number [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Fmployer

Mr. Burns
October 29, 1992
Please be advised that the submitted report is now considered
a part of your approved mine development plans as previously
stipulated and subject to the conditions of your mining permit.
Please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Debbie Barbee or me
regarding any questions you might have about this matter. Thank
you for your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
Jo n L. Holley, Jr., .E., CPESC
gional Engineer
Land Quality Section
cc: Tracy Davis, E.I.T.
Pat Shillington, P.E.

Leo\
i
a Rjo
b
R4F.�f
8 1
P11A[iry '
SfQ/0N 24
a
l�
I BOISE CASCADE "
I
II
$,RtckkalEwl rn/,uE ow
382.00 ACRE SURVEY FOR
CHEROKEE BRICK COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
FEDERAL TRACT NO. B-22035
CAPE FEAR TOWNSHIP. CHATHAM COONTY,NORTH CAR00h
JANUARY 29 , 0985 SCALE I+400'
C. H. BLUE AND ASSOCIATES, P. A.
SOUTHERN PINES, N.C.
e00 0 e00 eo
1'=400
cceM f

ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE COMPANY
3008 ANDERSON DRIVE, SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27609
[phone] RECEIVED
September 14, 1992 SEP 2 3 1992
DEHNR-RAL RO
Mr. John Burns
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 458
Sanford, NC 27330
RE: Hydrologic and Hydraulic Evaluation for Structures at
Brickhaven Mine No. 2, Chatham County, North Carolina
Job No. 070292
Dear Mr. Burns:
The primary purpose of this evaluation is to study the water
passed through three structures at the drainageway that runs
north -south through the property. The study included
determination of peak flow rates for the 107year and 25-year
frequency rain events, the resistance of these structures to
erosion, and the formation of water behind the structures for
sediment control purposed. The Attachments contain the various
supporting calculations. Following is a brief discussion of the
evaluations.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Three structures cross over the drainageway that runs north -south
through the property. The structures consist of two roadways
with culverts and a check dam. The check dam is'the most
downstream structure. Active mining is being conducted west of
the drainageway. Runoff related to mining activity collects in
the mine excavation -where it -is eventually pumped into a sediment
basin. The water from the basin then drains to the drainageway
immediately upslope of the check dam. The mine excavation will
be advanced northward paralleling the drainageway. Initial
stripping of the ground will result in sediment runoff into the
drainageway upslope of the most upstream roadway. As mining
progresses, the runoff will be collected in the mine excavation.
To the east of the drainageway are three petroleum contaminated
storage stockpile pads. With collection.ponds at each stockpile
pad, no runoff from these. areas enter the drainageway. Runoff
from land disturbing activities east of the drainageway are only

from roadway and other stockpile areas outside of these petroleum
contaminated soil storage areas.
The most upslope roadway is more than 200 ft. long across the
drainageway. Two-15 inch diameter corrugated metal culverts pass
water through the roadway. The crest of the roadway is 2.5 ft.
higher than the culvert inlet inverts.
The next downslope structure consists of a roadway that is at
least 100 ft. long across the drainageway. A 18-inch diameter
corrugated metal culvert passes water through the roadway.
The crest of the roadway is 4.0 ft. above the inlet of the
culvert. Immediately upslope of the culvert inlet is a brick
check dam that forms a half circle around the pipe inlet. The
crest of the brick check dam is 50 ft. long (radius of about 16
ft.) and is 3.5 ft. above the pipe invert.
The most downstream structure consisting of a brick check dam is
4.0 ft. high. The check dam spans approximately 75 ft. across
the drainageway.
The drainageway ground level is about 4 ft. in elevation
difference at each structure. Past observations by Cherokee -
Sanford personnel indicates that the roadways have not substained
erosion damage while the most downstream brick check dam had
washed out on several occasions.
EVALUATIONS
The evaluations are related to the various structures that cross
the drainageway. For these structures the following was
addressed:
1. watershed Runoff Evaluations
2. Flowrate Verses Headwater Depth
3. Erosional Resistance of Structures
4. Sediment Collection Suitability
Following is a brief discussion of the evaluations.
Watershed Runoff Evaluation
Peak flow rates from the 10-year'and 25-year frequency rain
events were estimated for each structure using the SCS TR-55
method. The Hydrologic Soil Group "D" was conservatively used

for all areas. Cover consisted of forest with heavy underbrush
or exposed disturbed ground. Since at least 3 percent of the
watershed areas consists of swampy and ponding areas, the peak
flow rates were reduced by 25 percent. The flow rates for each
successive downslope structure were added to the upslope flow
rates.
For the most upslope roadway, the watershed area (WS No. 1) was
175 acres. Approximately 37 acres were assumed disturbed due to
future mining activities. The next downslope roadway had about
14.8 acres (WS No. 2) with 1.4 acres being exposed ground. The
checkdam had about 8.2 acres (WS No. 3) with 0.7 acres exposed.
The following table lists the peak flow rates.
Individual Peak Flow Rates Cumulative Peak Flow Rates
WS No. 10-year 25-year 10-year 25-year
1 167 211 167 211
2 15 19 182 230
3 9 12 191 242
Flowrate Verses Headwater Depth
The flowrate discharge capacity for the various structures were
determined for varying headwater depths. Tailwater effects were
not considered in the analyses since each structure was at least
4 ft. higher than the next downslope structure. General sketches
show each structure on the first page of Attachment B.
For the upslope roadway with the two-15 inch diameter culverts, a
brick checkdam was assume encircling the inlet for the culverts.
The checkdam shaped in a half circle was assumed to have a radius
of 21 ft. (length of 65 ft.) and the crest 2 ft. above the
culvert inverts. Also, the roadway crest was raised 1 ft. to 3.5
ft. above the culvert inlet invert. The length of the roadway in
which overtopping will occur is assumed 100 ft.
In general, for up to 6.0 cubic feet per second flow, the brick
checkdam controls the headwater depth. Above this flowrate, the
culverts control headwater depth and the checkdam becomes
submerged. When the headwater depth is just at the crest of the
roadway, the flowrate is 12.5 cubic feet per second through the
culverts. At the 10-year and 25-year peak flowrates, water
overtops the roadway and the respective headwater depths are 4.15
ft. and 4.25 ft.
For the roadway with the 18 inch diameter culvert, existing

conditions were assumed for the structure. The length of the
roadway was assumed 75 ft. for overflow conditions. The analyses
indicates that the brick checkdam controls the headwater depth up
to 4.6 cubic feet per second. At greater flowrates, the culvert
controls the headwater depths and the brick checkdam is
submerged. When the headwater depth is at the roadway crest
level, the outlet flowrate is 9.5 cubic feet per second.
Headwater depths at the 10-year and 25-year peak flow rates are
4.85 ft. and 4.95 ft., respectively.
For the most downstream structure, the
check dam were assumed with a width of
conditions. The headwater depths for
peak flow rates were estimated at 5.17
respectively.
Erosion Resistance of Structures
existing conditions of the
50 ft. during overflow
the 10-year and 25-year
ft. and 5.35 ft.
For the roadways, the upslope circular check dams were evaluated
for two situations, at maximum flowrate in which the dams control
the headwater depth and at the headwater depth level with the
roadway crest. Once the roadway is overtopped, water flow will
be more dispersed and actual flow over the check dam will not
significantly increase.
Based on the various velocities and depths, the factor of safety
against incipient motion of the brick was determined at the crest
and downslope side of the checkdam. In general, the factors of
safety for both roadway check dams were not less than 6.9 at the
crest, and 4.1 for the downstream slope. The downstream slope
was assumed to have a 4:1 (H:V) slope.
To evaluate the stability of the roadway during overtopping, the
25-year peak flow rate was used. On the crest of the roadway,
water velocities ranged from 4.0 ft./sec. to 4.5 ft./sec. The
velocities are not considered excessive since the roadway
material consists of compacted clay shale with brickbats
intermixed. For material of this type, velocities up to 6.0
ft./sec. are permissible.
Along the downstream slope of the roadways, the waterflow can
cause erosion and to protect the downstream slope, brick bats
were assumed as lining material. For the most upslope roadway,
the slope of the brickbat should be 4:1 (H:V) to obtain a factor
of safety against incipient brick motion of 1.19. For the
downslope roadway the brickbat slope should be 5.5:1 (H:V) to
obtain a factor of safety of 1.25.
For the most downstream brick checkdam, the 25-year peak flowrate
was used to evaluate the factor of safety against incipient

motion for the brickbat on the crest and stone lining material on
the downstream slope. At the crest of the check dam, the factor
of safety against brick movement is 1.63. On the downstream side
of the check dam, Class II Rip Rap is required for liner material
with a surface slope of 4:1 (H:V) to achieve a factor of safety
of 1.34.
Outlet protection for the roadway culverts also were evaluated
with headwater depths resulting from the 10-year rain event. The
flow rates require minimal outlet protection and brickbat
material can be used for outlet protection.
Sediment Collection Suitability
The water surface area formed behind each structure for the
10-year rain event meet the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment
Control Guidelines. The upslope circular brick check dams also
will provide sediment control during low flow conditions.
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Based on the analyses, the following should be implemented:
1. Construct a half circle brick checkdam upslope of the two-
15 inch diameter culverts. The check dam should be 2 ft.
high and have a minimum crest length of 65 ft. The crest
should be at least 5 ft. wide, the upstream slope 2:1
(H:V) and downstream slope 4:1 (H:V).
2. The crest for the roadway with the two-15 inch diameter
culverts should be raised an additional 1 ft.
3. The downstream slope of the roadways should be lined with
brickbats with the brick thickness of at least 1 ft. The
surface of the brick should be sloped at 4:1 (H:V) for the
roadway with the two-15 inch diameter culverts and at
5.5:1 (H:V) for the roadway with the 18 inch diameter
culvert. Laterally from the toe of the slope, the brick
section should continue a minimum distance of 4 ft.
4. With the roadway downstream slopes flattened, the culverts
will need to be extended to daylight at the toe of the
slope. The lateral extension of brick 4 ft. downslope
from the toe of the slope is sufficient for the culvert
outlet protection.
5. The downstream slope of the checkdam will need to be lined
with Class II Rip Rap with a minimum thickness of 2.5 ft.
The surface of the rip rap should be 4:1 (H:V) or flatter.

6. The required crest width for all structures should be
relatively level. The minimum width should be 100 ft. for
the roadway with two-15 inch diameter culverts, 75 ft. for
the roadway with the 18 inch diameter culvert and 50 ft.
for the brick checkdam.
CLOSURE
we appreciate serving you on this project. Please contact us if
you have any questions about this evaluation.
`Sincerely,
T. Patrick Shillington, P.E.
President
TPS/dls
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
,,�ttFtlttertt�q
H CAROt '••,,
10*
ySE A1" i
.15472
'Rose ItIl"

p w i -,.s cc.'' � � _: �JlYw it'r'',S�rfPJ It��, N4Jua y'°U ✓1 .. � 1 , 1
{ �J-.ValkiYavl JS Cq�J��if� fU fqP "'irwo f�oovwo� Slrr.vtr{G✓tt -�iv� ``144
,
i bv.cl� cdrek fJpJty -frip� �,✓P :n'.I :t¢J'i iS ,oY: J?9,f /J IvCJC'+Tri rN✓� i.
.s yJ.. ,Z ,S nib, ]bP T 'Crc15 Srti e�%J Of...7".:kP if i
LYJvirLS SJ':-dc�p J ,.- ;
{ G✓P S/fvwn lJ//.W �1%P fnog'% 4 [ /
P 50 VPG w'a N5. , .. P J y h 4"t I$ ' /Jrtl CJIrFrOa�
}
{I t%rP r/✓wl+S tpP VouJw ry h43. 'DhP /'$'13rGLfrsO'..' .. .":
;
1 i1'"'b t'k [yr<.4 J✓M .a(5D r«Xi$ ue" u t/fl.0 l�✓2J< Ckre/Y IJaJy�
r
t /?t PnJ-+G f' the %jigJ q "jJJpP Eo2h'-�$
J p'JNPet.
4( /awry:..Yk>n i"At LJA'e
QH `hd✓ A p t �Xl• t v WillLO
tl
Ll
t 7'PG.k 'TJb°✓ V'a'Jr5 'w Pv J r - 1 .7 r :'''
each. 15� c*G ftr✓P, � ilyP'L as/c✓/a/••nJt
ay"fuLuS ,ru�r[afly�L.i acJ rGa�:�S
( N T++P �'✓p�(I':',Sh/U' i r: file I•'✓61" �4/'/SIe/%P 1^OGt✓Ivb� ',,is V40V P75'4t
rl'b04�j 3(4 4tIr;.WrYG cvMlp tIPLPiY /r ....�u! lr (fi ve Awr leiv!41 64 ii
I -. .dd/'.OS .&IIfhff'wwA J1i'r fl' Gb V(S G✓P:.S C(r"d fA �1l fP H'ir/l"yir$hedI .ULJra�6vN� UIJr/a/r
rf/b V(/YUrf —/'✓em ,frvv / alwg :..,.
rC54/7' -O'� vein. 3 ONi y'ld <On S)r vt{/eq PI 'S/o "osr �/i�S fv 'r'
,..
yet Con lnm!hn J SL/. fI p�
vJlr-v'✓r /e _ .ZM C�.YCGIG/•%q
I / 5'%r'a... rur.%l; '(✓<ir f5 'dt'/a37/," its. ��e'.,,Ya
J i, > ,
I� ° f[t (. '•prep i'1 ?'G �Sh nN%r -J`�� L✓n Jri tii/J rGfi. .. e�f Co•f fri/P✓t� $LVasMlf ov p Nr�.S..,
' �a Fer rJJ f•+J(%rStfl'u��.�ri'�•Str t:idaJvrH7`rf�vtan5/s/7P ISi✓.+c Yu vlSJ Y'bP fJra.1' -- �`
Y e
I f/ � va [ Wtd ✓! G!%t/ir% 7[15]/PatJ',�j`�, t�s /i VnJ.Hr.7S yke p/ok fY/W✓ iP {
f u5 p rC:Sr (1� V ✓ .J ,T'mb C;r Lr .�6PiJ7��-w� w3; iA;s r✓ <r�i,n'y'rviS 't.:r.-
a 1
JJ1Pw$aY. ihigkrr vb/p P, eri✓l% fker-r6✓P i9 CoNS'���'✓/, ,✓y>!/6w. rs i5 ,
I
I
I
I alp% zfi ii% h 2/i 'a
i
3 `f z I/-8 lg! 2uLQ

� ' /
w: � �� �

WorlisNeet 2: Runoff eucve nufn6er,and.runoff _
.iPkn✓Nct FPS'
Date .
Loci clan Checked Dace
` Cite It one: Present Developed io.
1. Runoff curve number (CN) -
NEI
:Soil name
Cover description
' .:
Area
Product
. and,
-
�,
CN'L-
of .
-hydealdgie "
(cover type, treatment a5d^
ry
CN x area
i group
hydrologic dondieiom;
ti
i
i
❑ac5es
percent impervious.;
❑mi--
unconnecced/conne2cedimpervious
y
rc
au
❑S
`.(appe¢dix A).
- -area ratio)
F
77
138 -
Go626
•
krPosr/
aJy
37
3u7Q,`
1 /.. Use only one 0 source per line. - - - Totals
to tal product �(//d�
CN (velghted) coral area ��'� Use CN 8�
�S
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. Yr
Rainfall, P (26-hour) .................. in
Runoff, G .............................. in
(Dee P and CN with cable 2-1, fig. 2-1*
or ace. 2-3 and 2-6.)
Scots I2
Storm 93
E
/D3•,y,
4, 3
(214VI-TR.55, Second Ed., June 1986)
S/5'�IiBSD 3?3IS?SI

i
' - Worksheet 1.11me of concentration (Tc) or
traveltime (Tt)
•'
RV1L)e Ra✓f9 N.2 e
. Project /n7hBY
.➢ace
- Location Checked Date
-
circle one: Present ➢eveloped (+✓ 5 �UI
Circle one: T. Tt through subarea
-
a
NOTES: Space fora many as two gegmenta,per flaw type
can be used for each
" - varksheet.
'
Include a map, schematic, or description of flaw
-segments.
Sheer flow (Applicable to Te only) gagmen ID
1
-
"..
r
' 1. Surface description (table 1-1) ............
U•//p"8`wj
- -
1. Manning's roughnesa toff., n (table 1-1) ..
O• S
1. Plow length, L (total L C 100 90 .......... it
.. 4. hpo-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. In
o340
3'
5. Land slope. a .............................. ft/ft
OHO 2i
OPOo7
6r Tt Compute It,...... hr
..
.. .
63 U.4
2
Shallow concentrated flow Segment to
1'
7. Surface description (paved or unpaved).....4nP°VPV
tan d
4n f'�/
f
o�
280O
9No a ............;.......... ft/ft
( . ce [course slope;
0:0 23
D. o I
�„
.,
' 10. Average Y-(figure 1-O fc/a
velocity, ...........
�'
/��-
" '•
11. Tt Compute Tt hr.
0'0
Q: it
�: w7®•
'.
......
3600 V
/
Channel flow Segment I➢
,
12. Cross sectional flaw area, a - ft2
,
--
11. Netted perimeter, P.
14. Hydraulic radius, r —7 Compute r ..... ft
-
Pw
' 15. Clunnel slope, a ....ate/Se
l
.. - 16. Kenning's toughness' coat[., n .............:
?' •
9
,.. 2/I l/T
1.49 ra
-17.
.. :.
" ..c Y'. Compute V fc/s
•: ;•.
n
+ r •. 18. plow length, L .. ......... ........ ft
....
.,
,'.'.-.
•',
- 19. Te •Camp t T�
3600 V ':, ... Rr
20. Watershed or subarea Tc-or TC (add Tt in•steps -6,
11, and 19) ..... hr
��
- (210.V1•TR-66, Secand Ed., June
AM)
`: D

- Worksheet 4: GraphicalPeak Dischafte method' -
Project 6r%r. i(b&w" /If, of A/O 2 By _- Date - -
Location - Checked Date -
circle and: Present .Developed ,_�
I. Data:. "- .�
Drainage"area .-........ Amy Q,'i73'"ef '(acre' )640
Runoff curve number .... CN. tiI (From workaheet 2)
Time of concenLrat'lov -... T�.d l_ hr (From vorksheet 3)
Rainfall' distribution type - ,/L .'. (T, IA,.II, III)'
Pond and swamp areas spread '•'".
throughout watershed ...... 3 ® percent of Am (- acres' or ml? covered)
' 2. !Frequency ........ ........ 9r ..
3. 'Rainfall, P (24-hour) ................... in
Storm JI
Scorm 02
Storm 63'
- =4.
tnicial abstraction, Ia ..............
in
0' 9
�. 4G
-
(Use CN with table. 4-1.)
.....'
-'
-.,.5.
Camp ute Ia/P ............................
'-' 6.
Unit peak discharge: a .................
V
'CS/in
'
(Dee Tc and Ia/P with exhibit 4 =)
.. .: ,
'7.
Runoff, Q .................... 4..........
in
C� iL• 3
(From workaheet 2).
-
S.
Pond and swamp adjustment factor, F
-
0.7 5
Q.
(Use percent pond and swamp area P
.. �..
_.L
with table 4-2, Factor is 1.0 for,
-
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
-
' '
' 9.-,Peak
discharge,
_
•/I/7. .Z'.
.. "r.
9P ......................
. cfs
W .�'
(where Rp - 9uAeQFP)
t - .
or
(230-VI-TRb6, Second Ed., June 1986)

a
I

Worksheet 2:. Runoff -curve number and runoff
/�..
Project qkr [.)(✓ts wl M. %1'h ef. fib/, Z BY Data
.. Location Checked-_ Baca ,. ...
Circle one: Present Developed
1: 'Runoff curve number (CN)
.D-2
'Soil Fume
and
•hydrologic. ,
. group
¢appendix 4),
Cover description ':
-
(cover -type; treatment aria
- hydrologic conditio ;
,percent impervi'pm;
'unConneet¢d/connected impervious
area 'ratio)' '
CN
Aiaa
(�acr�as
mi-
❑ z
Product
of
CN x area
"
'
ry
rry
w
a
a
.T
L eo
r
m
J Use only "a CH source per line. I Toeale -
/�'/..
IA //'I
CN (weighted) - Coral product ow. I �!` Use CN
total area •(� y
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) ...................; in
Runoff. Q .............................. in
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqa. 2-1 and 2-4.)
Storm 01
Storm 02
Storm IJ
3, 2
14, I
(210.VI-TR.55, Second Ed., June 1986)
Ip
._'yr

Woorksheet 3: Time of concentration (Te) or travel time (Tt)
Project Rv;oe hp ✓lq 'M"N/ „Vd' % By _ Date -
Location - Checked _ Date
Circle. one: Present DevelopedN/Z-
Circle one:. Tc Tt through aubaces
NOTES: Space for as many am two segments per flow type can be used for each.
warksheeG -
Include a map, schematic; or description of flow segments. _
Sheet flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment M
1. Surface description (table.3-1)............. 4.� i -
2. Warning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) .. O. _
3. Plow length, L (total 1 C 300 it) .......... it
4. Two-yr 24-hr - - •- rainfall. P1.................. Sv 3' •p,.:
3. land slope, a .............................. ft/ft ;>
D.e
6. Tt - (IP0007Compucs Tt
2
s
shallow concentrated flow .Segment I➢ 2
un yJ ..N,'ea
' 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved).....
0. Plow length. L ............................. it
9. Watercourse slope, s ....................... ft/ft D�•y�p �,C7 3 O
-10. Average velocity. V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s
11.. To, - 3600 V. Compute Tt ...... or
.. -*:[
Channel flow segment 0 _
12., Cross sections flow area, a .. ........; £t2 '
13. Wetted perfecter, p ..................... it
14. Hydraulic radius, [ - PY. Compare r ....... it
13. Channel slopes
16. Hanningfa roughnes co lf..:a ....
2/3' t/2-
.'l7. V - L49 is • Compute V ....... fe/s
18. Flew length L .. .... it
19.• Tt 7600 Y Compute Tt he +
20. Watershed or subs rem, Tc or TE, (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19) hr
(2104VI-TR.(5, Second Ed., June 19M) •' D

Worlcsheet 4d'Gr4phfcM Peak Discharge -method. -
Bra jecr Pp ;ti0✓•w NJ� :Z`: _ _ By Date
Location. Checked:._ Dace -
l Circe one Present) Developed
- - _ eloped
1. Dacn'' - - - ,
-_ 03,2, �Drama a area .........��,2mis/fi40 )(acre ..
Runoff curve number cm �% '% (Prcm4arksheet 2) .
Time �of concentrac Lon Tc ! 5•7 hr (Prom uorksheat 3)
'Rainfall distribution type. - (I; IA,'II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread
' throughout wecarshed .... f. - �• (`� Percent of Am (_ acres or m12 covered)
-.,
..: 2.
Frequency
.' ...........................:[:.-
Yr
3.
Rainfall,
P (24-hour) .....:..............
in
Storm #1
1. Storm 02
.Storm. 3
4'. Initial abstraction, I ................. . 'in O' 6-32-0,5 3 2
a
.'(Use CR with table 4-1.) - -
5. Compuce I /P
6. Unit peak discharge, 'q ................. csm/in
(Use Tc and, Ia/P with exhibit 4- .
7. Runoff. Q................:.............. in '/:,_ '
(Promworksheet 2). - -
8. Pond and swamp adjustment factor, FP .... �,75 0' 7S
(Use 'percent pond and swamp area
with table 4-2. 'Factor is.1.0 for
zero percent pond and swamp area.) /� O
9. Peak diseharge..gP ....................:.'. oft
�(Whsre qp ' gwAmQFP). -
41
(210•VI-TR56, Second Ed., June 1986)

�.:
/ }
// �. � ./ I `. 1 ..c.l.

C
v
2
p7 Worksheet 2i- Runoff cvaventlm6er and remoff
Rp vide LPb Pi �', M'ha By _' Date
Location Checked Date -
Circle one: Presanc. Developed•
�1.. Runoff curve number (CN)
-Boil name
and
hydrologic(cover
group
'-
(appendix -A)
_,Cover description
-
type, treatment., and
hydrologic condition;
percent impervious; -
unconnected/connected impervious
area ratio)
CN L
Area
❑ acjca
❑ 2
.Produce'
of
CH x area
ry
m❑mi-
n
4
m
<
m
y
r
EXpaS rU
`1y
Us&. only one GY source per line. Totals
total product_
CN (weigheed) . ��?3 7$, i vac Q - 79
total area Z ,
2. Runoft
Frequency ...........,. ...............:.. •yr- .
Rainfall, P (24-hour) "
Runoftp Q in
Storm JI
'Storm 02
Scam #3
3,2-
/
(Use P and CN with table 2-L, fig. 2-1.
or eqs. 2-3 and'2-4.) ,
D-2 121(M-TR-55, Second Ed., June 19M

Woorkshh"t-3:'Timfe Hof concentration (T.) or travel time (Tt)
/J Pro lect _ ✓,'&,k kr ✓f ✓1- pvY i 114 jW P � BY Dace
.location Checked ➢ace
-
Circle One: Present Developed
Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea
Kong: Space for as many as two 'segments per flaw type can he used for each
workeheec.
Include a map, -'schematic, of description of flaw arguments.
Sheet flow (Applicable to i only) Segment ID `
c. h wL✓
-1. 'Surface description (table 3-1) ............
2. Manning's roughness coefft, n (table 3-1) .. 0'
3. Flow length,'L (teeal 1 <'300 fi) .......... Et 30(]
4. ho-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in
5. Land' slope, e ....'ft/ft f. 017
6e Tt 0 007aCompute ITt_ .... 'hr aS y
P2 s
Shallow canceatra red flow _ Segment I➢ 2
7.. Surface description (paved or unpaved) un/Yr's _
.S. Plow length, L ....................... ft .. ✓r'd y:.
9. .Watercourse slope, a ..... ........:.......... ft/ft
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1),' ... ft/a �' _ -
1l.Tt 3600 Y ' :. - Compute Tt
Channel flow Segment 0
12. Cross ceetienal flow area, 'a t2
.. ..-'
13. Wet red perimeter, As ........................ ft :.
14. Hydraulic radius„r - F - Conjure r .......
w
15. Channel elope, Y ........................... ft/ft -
16. Manning's roughness coeff., a ..............
1.49 r2/3 I/2
17. V a ° Compute V ....... We
18. ?law length, L ............................. ft
19. Tt 3600 V Compute Tt ...... At ♦ ��
20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19) ....... hr
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)

"Worksheet4: GraphicalTeilk Discharge. method
'Project Ock Hw✓Fh /yY, Z. 10i'Nlo By Date... r
Location - IIChecked Dare
;Circle, one:. Present Developed Wei 14 0 2- _ -
.Data:
Drainage area .......... AM mil (acres/640)
t .Runoff curve -number .... CN y (From vorksheet 2)
Time of concentration .. Te 2�/ hr (From wrksheec 3)
Rainfall distribution type -lZ (I, IA, II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread - -
throughoutwacershed .... 3.y 'percent of Am (_ acres or m12 covered)
2. Frequency ............................... yr
3. Rainfall, P (24-haur) .................... in
Storm #L
Storm 02
Storm J3
4. Inteial abstraction, Ia ...............1. in O�5-3 Z O.S.3 Z
(Use Cy with cable 4-1. ).
5. compute I /P .............................. - IPSS ib O.
a
6.' Unit peak discharge, 9 .....:........... csm/in 3 0 0 306
(Use Tc and Ia/P with exhibit 4-T%) '1
.7. Runoff,.Q................................ in,
" (From worksheet 2).
8.. Pond and swamp adjustment factor, Fp
(Use .percent pondand swamp area L '
with cable 4-2. factor is 1.0 for. -
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
9" Peak discharge,. 9
.. (Where Rp - RUAmQFp)
.t ..
. .. ...
04 (216-VI-TR-e6, Second Ed., June 1986) -

0117 iri
t 6
.ai LOW; uVf°/ hFf �j^OSS -,fPLy%r n.�.' SkPVG bPj '�O G�- / Se �VnT✓rir, $9
J-ol
a 1
F
�'Ll
t
I f
I k
i
Lvb3}h Of o��y:raork
1.
'/liidwnl ' r $.ILk II
it
51.'r�.�z 1
4,&6_.
d
j a qt B eF Lierid i� i 4� 't I r r4�wa /.i!�
t 4 1 ra i4s..c
_
1 { ' ^.' .,
tf
ttt p.ttIt
-.1 t ;J rl 'L rmiM1 'rr'oodw� �S j° Eff K/a /n aS ;-1
la 3 a� '- t S S I 7p5:cK cr q
1
Ir
4,;;
�oD �lPto
p I
1;5 Ybal n n
_
advvao
7nD aflpot�p.0pro
vv`��0'b�0va'o

e _
i 1 I
♦i �a�-"�';i:� .s �. �kaW. Gq/7Vfi/.� t �G/C k./4 �iJ"li �:,�� �4)i/P.� SYV a,[•/N`il/ 1
I � � � • I � t .li.
tMusj-4�SIa®e a.z/h ,C% c. krckdGw
v� ' Yet, .7'oal�va.�j fbP fop v�
1 /lbrovdwuk. <'s v0#ro X;w141P t� J�,s''FJ
tO � u6ov( fyP..cc'w,e ,'Alef! in✓/•f
Tll
✓e/N4'�'en ass MPl r'oa!lua� vb/`'s J-Dffv
E Pu>'of; %qo< f rovJ o /.u.SSuhr� v5vr� Flo i ID P
F
Zfl hip li Cli rCk r/oy /�' Pre, rti4ve tiG c
af' to /f c/P, de k
�. •fl//ew vnjfs, j
�, ®l+u.Iaf v.7+. ✓4/NO !'!(1 r1( 2.� /I%!l/ / �V�✓IL. Ic .4VP .vo a5e, .`.
II`_ I' l^ooGfwdy. 9u/veyf5 •. `�'e�$�/ah5 w:Y'Gi iw �r�.Y S,/vre
I o: ooSfi/f�.. Fo/% ,.f'�5. s rQm� p :y � ! 4 vS H dap fi h, Fmllo"w yS�.:
a:
t i �
/a/.. , a - j..
Flow R fe
I ft%5
_ I+ id
ail
rog $/e'POOGSf�
t
�� •.. 'I .. �rTTrT1�Tl�l I —1 ITTTT-TIIY�'. ` :,. � t..
0 f Z` 3p' 4 r1 1 C 7
e _ 0ry+l l' o'I ' /iP o r6,....Ysrr f f
�� a _ a

PROJECT:, lTr�c.I'(xa�f✓l Me,_2 /H we.
.. DESIGNER. —
DATE: -'
HYDROLOGIC ANDL CHANNEL INFORMATION
-" SKETGH'-.-
STATI ON :-
.. ..
��S�-/S
AXWT /pL/NOJ - I.
02-
TWp=
{O Sp':OedUTW
-
EL-
/ CI - DISCHARGE,
su
MEAN STREAM VELOCITY=_
CHECK
` MLA acts Disc xAssE, yr Osp OR oloo /
:MAX STREAM VELOCITY=_
CULVERT
WEADWATERL
COMPUTATION
:•
`
�HW
_. pE SGNIPTIOM
p
SIZE
INLET CGNT.
OUTLET= CONTROL
X f Ib LSp
GOST
COMMENTS
DENTRANCE rvPEl
it—Wp
HW
Ka
H .:
dp
ES�O
TW-
hp
LSp
k
cm])
2
5"
bGy
ass
.
4
l:vy
G3�
;,2.
Ci
/,,03
SUMMARY,a RECOMMENDATIONS: -
P �;D �rOad G�isnnPl W!i�fh
b/ir./u{i`cr+S i?^e
104
1«Tx
rr

.
Op
OCHART.2
Igo —�
10.000
_ .. ..
'
160
000 6,
_
EXAMPLE
156
6000
.. D.D r.el
6.
12�
5,000
D 6D'ab
IH
-
4.000
,
5.
6.
,
132
3,000
I�al
5: 8.'
120 I
x o00'
T.1
IZI -
5.
106
4.
�111
J i
- ea
e0o
r '
- D00
i°
z
3
100
��
OFW
49
R
/
90
y
J
a
60
It
LEI
sz
-
40
n
1.0ILE
J6
30
HD SG LE dN1-
w
TY
a
33
20
In
.9
-
c
a
.e
-
30
ID1 .11.
.22
I....
'T
.T.
-
-8
24
.].O
p
�L
y
:...
Ixl 01olliall
O
.If
Ib J
:21
.14
I 1p n
H F
1
IV . If,, lh,D,gh
.e
e
If
Y
19.
3
D
:0
Lo
r
12
N'E-ADWATER
DEPTH FOR
f�lf
-C. M:-PIP.E
CULVERTS
I1�
-
WITH
INLET
CONTROL
DURCAU
DI FUDICFWDx
J.Mi4lI
.•.
11
�'
_
;;JppJtt}f
.182
.,
I:
,.

III OI CH'ART 6
I,
:Boo
lit
HIF
600
6' P
WiMERR"D OUT cT clLy
600 120 + ev D::< .0 j
S - � +
.500 100 a.. r.dnu ... by �6 /
400 96
W "
tl 300 Bo
O
III -200 72 I p
R efi
b ?
I � se z
P A N100 W 2
as � ;�= 33,� - � y
61, y7 42 ,p9 00 G
't W 60 m /y.
a
Iypp�l Y J0 06 �� 100 5
r{ _ aOa' w 33 / j00 6 F D
IFI O _
IL
W
a 2T B'
0
20. 24
COo' 10 .
400
j
. 21 500
j 500
5
I2
HEAD FOR
STANDARD
C. M. PIPE CULVERTS
- - FLOWING FULL
. ee.cm ar'.eeuc ROAM .i... M6e n = 0.024 .(.
Itfll

pf
JI
RANGE OF a, OaD
ip
0,90
l�ec.Y
7p
I'
5
Lh
�
svl
1
1�
4
LL
�
Q
� n
in
0
a
2
�y
wr
j9 50 50 50 60 70 80 90 IGO .
DISCHARGE-O -CFS
1---
- --
n tC YCf
T
RAIIGE
OF
a�
0?0
TO
0.90
DISCHAkE-,0-CFS
8
Y•
M �•
dd
�-t•
.l
1
yl
5 �
a
0
a
00
Boo
EGG,
'1i000-"
V
�
T
I
5
jai
--L
...._I_
-
-..1�
.__Rat CE OF <� 040 To 0.90
•I.00
'CISCHARGE-0-CFS
CIRCULAR PIPE
CRITICAL -DEPTH
fig

tc,
Ci•- 'G4)p/,�L ?l U'C/47i �i/C(/LI Ol//!J ✓r •�i 5 y/� 1` .'r•%�[•'��V fl Y✓%"%�P /•'I ,•1°� 'i
,J #T' s "' ;' ,/ � •./�{�p� � 17 .t `� ' :�� f.
t•� j,JxLl - •a�'�ia'� /`^�`/'y �Yl,'/17�•'.l
`./
I -� . ` '+ r ` � tµ �• � A '�/1W(C` !'.� � IvG i� 1,��, �� �.F �^L/.,, � '� E /////%r.' _ I �/ ;%.�/�_ ///' . - JJ^' �.f ,. � 1_/ Jl�)—�� /'i _• L/�yJ//�/ �./��� f `
I� ' , �, V • �� .Q��"I .1,:'!.'f 4f/, iC�,�1�V� �I,'1..,.\ :.., L„�♦�I•�:R V'?.1!•/i ,�.
uV-'ta��rj>�l*'' oic •''1�I�5 Itii,�.. Flawa7` fa/cy%TJ�i� �..
de►�rnWed ">�m. C�lv�.►-7t•'.�,,►j�,Jr/�5- (,Arles .,Cie
�,_ r �i.I✓P�1T R i' - Y �/''. .` i.'/��:.
, UV+S•V�I►/'y�/�•'
0,15 0%o3
Nut, Odr'p7�h"p�iot� cvl�ry7r".iiJvt�_% r 5.r���t/lf�+� f(1-,'fi'ro�h� zf1� F ;.
.•'�•.§ ,� .�lj �`�Dkr%W�� .�- •��G�/c�a� /'S• . ���p/ ,u/,o��' �`DO."/.'�,av�/ • Tp#�� ��%i"S�h :y� � ��•
1 Gain', PSfi a+u/rU1,OWf' �.3uie . 6N/,i1; �fG._ Gf
v 2 E O,oO3 '6.,
I Q, Q!o.o5 �. �.6!63
0.013. 3
1. � /1✓a��e Api G6v,.0; cvIvov-� %S PykR/ /0 veja/h f7L
I

MO
.
i PERCENT SUBMERGENCE O/H % 100
iB e0 e2 aq B6 GB -90 92 94 96 so. AIca0-77. 1 .Q
0..
i 30B
Lr
3.06
_
3.02
B -.
Do
' 014. 016
0.16' 020 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.29 .. 030
I
306IL I
as N
302�..
OF 2.96 NOTE FUSE iH15 CURVE FOR FREE FLOW
ii.�p -- - • - COEFFILIENTSWIT4H/(RATIOS(CH5.
o.b
.A, . ..
�1 G.1 1 1 t- N 1j 1 I I. I I I I'
F'I 205 4 04, ,42 -1.6 2.0 %.a _ 26 32 3a 40
0i1:Q,f$ HEAD ON ROADWAY H W FEET
Figure 24.—Dhcharg Ricle`nta for flow over roadway embsnkmcn N.
port,.Mo., on IntemtnLr. 70. A profile ncroxs the throughout. This is the ideal valley Sasse.' section'
valley looking upstream ih :shown on figure 25. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is located well &hove high water, the approach - made -to fit the site. The arrangement will "com-, ...
embankment on the left is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur with' a mini,'.
flood level, yet there is adequate Right distance mum of damage. Computation of flow abross this
46 1

dva I;
Pq&tlw� wash LPti51h of /O �� ,
,.
/ ..5 f
PERCENT SUBMERGENCE D/H % IOOP
i6 �78 ed 82 84 Us as; 90 92 94P % 98 11CO ta
e
to
b.
I •.. 09' ••.Si
. I ..
..
C
i.
f, .
I OVERALL O-CILH".Cs/CI
49
k.
3.03
1, Q
z ]04
Gi OW 016 0.10 020 0.22 024 026 0.26 030 1
,f H/1 r
y
os .
Y 3.D25i -
{.
I
^ J 2.98 - NOTE ' USE THIS NTSCURVEWITH
H H FREE FLOW .�
�" ♦ CDEFFICIENTSWITH H/(RATIo$<0.15.
l 1 V_ 96 04
294
1.4i52 A
So 0 I 1. 1 1! 1 1 • •Y
•. o �O,y f,61 1.2 16 2.0 24 2.8 32 36 40
B,f 0,1 HEA00N ROADWAY H W FEET d
j•y•'. _ (
- .. IL:i
.. �..
Fi6ucc 24Dinclo, a mcioots for Row ),cr rmdwar cmbankmenn,
port, Mo., on Interstate 70. A profile across the " throughout. This is the ideal valley cross seetlorf -
d'++. - valley looking upstream is shown on figure 25. The and -the bridge, and embankment have liven tailor'
Bridge ie located well above high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement will soCI "a
embankment on the left is set at about the 75-year modate any flood that is likely to occur. with a mini- )
flood level, yet there is adequate .sight 'distance mum of damage. Computation of flow. across this.
1.;
11 •
46

i
f I i Ii all Fio,�oddw
Surse 9' Am+P�/n nM cM//t ,
a7:Alp
r
6s {
r
c
.'do
eo-
1 do do d
h' 6 6 1,
1
od
3 - 1do
dr
.,
91
do
1.
t
PL
0°€ .
i
r .1.
. 1.
a
do
I
y ,�.
`/7 '= Mii a 14/b✓1
0P 140
.1'✓-Sz
�/'11)elf
/ N.�N/j�-Y,(i �/d/ /Id/l ii �Oy
rl4 '
r/Id Fs;�
S. ^%i
Sri
91#12(. s�.f}S O
.y0 Ns, �M
5, 4
1 ..,doo,
. ,r qLI ;
Lei���. y✓/�J .jI J/ or Ll ,.:df-c y9."u'nL%� 9Sd/ V7
9,oK a/1 , �•'�%
,�...
}d,10.o5,3N.'F}°
".iPod
-�o/�.1_b
S�- •+.�o/a�/ �..-':.
,�/
r
a. ..
1
_

a
I
Y Far
t
al�wn3 /oPC ras/%w`a� ��, /e;W �i4H4.-b
1
r I
.�'
yra/C
I
T1�P.Ii..S�SYIM L�oH1 s/s o�';G �i�SS�.S
{
,:'.1.
_IB:'./J�,u,C./✓.r-1¢Hv�
4f14'IP
V
.4 t'•.;y..-...
_ 1
,i-k r.'cklr.rvf ry %t.if�H✓ri/�, "/f�:'ck .'C lr ij/r alum, raSti)rr'/
it
-.i
if v`n l:�'C/�/(
/,15 V s/a•a o _
'•
� �
I
Gr+/ur!JY :r/r f;. fTbe �^as!/N%gl/ Cv<Si.�iS'IPc//opy Yvl 'rnw jyr�'
/
-`�
%ho GAP 4,*P; �ib Tf ✓,Sli lq�4v/s-iiS-��2.
p.
�`"C/rI✓Pl��''Elnilria�i Ur9—..F'4 P'/$^I�GM/� r3 ffO �iL
E
w.'�h SrrP a o,00�Rsf�/Ff. Fd//a ,s s&.,.~>
//,� a/P/7/ %i
Lr
j
i
to R lr
1.0
2
i
a
I
rt
i
..!
i
1

' STATION:.-
7—EL—ND
OI TWI
DY = TWp =.
TW _.
Spz Ab9s - ,T
( DI - DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY ps (
MEAN'.STREAM VELOCITY=__
.
` or tllEcx Dlscx•nDE, s•r pyp OR plop /
'•. MAXI STREAM VELOCITY=_
-
CULVERT
_
HDT �-
. ,... ,. ; �l EAWATR- COMPUT EAT IONI r
-
._
-
DESCSIPTION
p�SIZE
LOST'
COMMENTS
INLET CONT.'
_OUTLET:LONTROL '.HW H L$O
ow
HW.4
ICs
H�
,dc
:TW,',
cExTx•xci xvEl
,ha..-
1102
1153=:
,
G11
;.y
113-
':.
y;z
oi4
101,,.
y
/,32
OF
?a51,!
1,3
1,-3-61142,5
/o
1.7
7,Sg
3.27,2
1,35
1,35By
1z
?.3Z
3,57
ihF
63
1.N
.'
it
o,U
C
,
_ p
SUMMARY 6 RECOMMENDATIONS:.
-
j�JLfv4 io
N
bm.s.
ckaNNP/,w,�iti.
of/>... x..
4 @
�'
r��•A .t ..

t ,r
O
CHART
2
I00
10, 000
166
8.000
EXAMPLE-
156�
,000
-poo
B 1e (an.�le0r q
0
(ZI
5
a'a Is
(3)
1aa
4000
s,
a.
132
3.000
- D tl..11
S
B.
;
- PI IJ !A
.
120
2,000
10 2,1 B.i -
5.
IOB
96
1, 000
3,
_.
.
4
goo
1�1
Hf
II4 _
99 C
-Boo
=Boo
1Ij
400
00
I.
x
60
u
200
z
1.5
Ls -
o
ac%
-
sa
o
I. 3 2
<0
¢
so
>
60
Of
a2
V
sa
m
1.0
LEI
1.02
..
O
//m
p
r
90
LO
-
ME
lio0i"
p
—
—
_'
w
36
JO H
ALE ENTRAN
w
TY
.9.
0
33
-
20
11 .NI
o
.0
0
Iil ...t, 1.11.1.
f 1
V
1
27
0 _
...
i
T
a
9
roil .e 1 . , 111,
"I MINI ;
.6
S
..
I
rB
.B
}y`rl
I5
2
R
1a
s
1
LO
.3
1
- 12
- HEADWATER
DEPTH
FOR.'
"' 'C.'M.
PIPE CULVERTS'
!Q
WITH
INLET.
TROL
CON.
xy
BUREAU
OF PUBLCRO.oe
9a•
182
1.14
II
II"

O
CHART-6
e.
r
2000
_
iboo
It
HOW
BoaSII
It
weMER"D o ri6T cu pUi
tl
600
120
1..
16
, L,
'-
500-
IOB
OO,
.0'
_ n r .
FrI
400
96
r0 .le
89
o i
1
I'
..
'Ir .ri i
20D
12
00
1 ..
BB
0
w
2' i
'
f C
60
'i
QJ
to
�IIB bj' ..
z
100
w
nk
Bo
1 pQlpllitE
¢
S
50
]fi
/
/r5..
V
to
3d
J00
6..
Oi.ww
1
30
0LI 7
cx
00. xip
11
a
YZo
—
0
WO
10
24
400
1
500
e
20
6
If.
1
L

1 bdt w� t" r ay, ,• U.. xF..µ.
{ 7
7�r fT, N M: cHaRr5f
dhJ PT'
va I
�i
2
I
�
x
`a
F�
kry
Ito,t } ,00
_ ]C•�fi0 0 80' go
'10.01.
w
DSCHARG,-Q-QFS
t�..i.
-114
a
4 6 TiIIt
Y
46
y I r
6
a olA wwr. Eit RANGE of a DAD TO 090
6 Q 3 I N Ff T _.I f1 I.00 5
_III_III
H 0 100 - 200, 300 :ADD ..500 600 700. 600 90Q IOOO.F
RL Imo. " 015CN4RGE- 0 - C F 5 ;
• A
Q ..._L_..._ .__._ I RaNOE Oi E�OAb TO 0.90 _
I.. aO—
• 1000 2000 3000 4000
DISCHAFGE-0 - CFS
-'I CIRCULAR PIPE
CRI?1GAL DEPTH
661
0.r �
�r
. v men: vL'�/u1v.41M1rPr'uY�'
25
J`
zo
I_
I
q/+YGE Oi O 0
TO 090

It
f.N6d�pi 6�j 1a H tiJ 5r 4:,v.nA�fO ��"°jn Yfdd
t ° b� o a'F osto'o
q 4 f
q I gILLZ ,e !� f I r Stt06) p J
r i
O£o'E o p
frr
40
It
R,
r DL S_ Sm�;E OS,00'0 ',. % O .'J '``.
d rlr I, '' p oZ OLy It SZciO O Z p L r k,
t��vh tars i 1 6 ri� %6r' n fZho , I. S-L 100.0 .�.A �.� M
7 t F
Y4y"' 1 y -
f
�1 C
'hz a,aaS,u*. r�r""'fs'd �ad`P
�
♦ 11.s11 5
�% sc:.rld off i ,= {I i "f ( %fin} fr �b+r�J.xih/-UAwr�loed`I�'�w e` 7�Yf.T
4
f
4h r I 4, :Y
;d f�f E Ir
ydd� o/./•+!d s / Hr y�� aoq� y{s>j� a�°y41 .}
f
wu �x"�}� Eih s9 o ;S9 E �'95 $ :o..sh'L £Q,� 1 p r I � ro
t t
I lV'rI i,
-Z h Sr 'L zo"�o ;�1 p -J.
O'l lo.O s o 0
_ f
41
i _ i ri H I f - n"dcffe✓n t4/°i
I �R
I �
t
i
`4
q ' �.' 1 ,
IL
I r ',. I. �ffdn O. •v .a+aiSn,9n5 K .. kS°IF ibdr7' '�dn `n
t'r - 0
19'fi.'dr..oiy,Z'v�nS�..'_Hvtfui,d�Sy.ao7: :aS °y�s',Cl• .'¢fpS
rI
{-sn°yA��rgFE :s /a /r�nOau.�r»y>>/>I unl{rn���� h :;d/'m9� »1 ® {
i �. 1)A '

R3Q1'IfI'YµY
�V fC �I -.
h +
Y
j1
GIC'.r GPI
rpN
1. 1'k5"y'i
hF:�i
{4
it
,
4
ygaeai(
ftr�tltt
i aL
t -
`.
,,f v n • PERCENT SUBMERGENCE,h/N x i00
r
- r16 'i 9b+ 92 Bi''i a6'B9 90" 92 - 94, 9fi
00 •f"f f.,
98, 1ti
r16,
y.
q
4 �It
.r
1
I
k'.
_
E.
- --., _. _
O6
}I'
I
;,'
.x P.
i3.08
.rr')Ft •F
'Fl
J 306
1
—
.
a. 304
-
�x5
g
f
71.
30b
LJ__�_L'+{
06
014 0.16 018 020 0.22 0.24 DEC 0.2e 0.DO
� `'
f
306
„NiA
302 ..
-
J 300
—
I �'
•:
. ]. f� 2.96
.NOTE' USE THIS CUR4E FOR FREE FLOW
le.'
i
COEFFICIENTS WIM H/(RATUS (0.11
`>1
r
i �"
2 fjh 29
L9,1Y' A
,.
2
N4'
`1 ffpp�
2.I IV<.90
4
'i'
11 4 oB 12. :. 16., 20 It 24 28 3.2 36 . 40'
-
J:Y �•:'
0I014+r5. HEAD ON ROAONAY HIry FEET
f�
'.
t .
Flyor. 2t—Di.ol R ..RIC"t`i for flow n•+rdwnD crabankonents.
t
r
'.on
of r^.
':port„
Me IntemboUe 70. A profile, ne}nssthe throughout. This is theideal
valley cross seciidn
'
• y: "'
valley. looking upatrrnm is Ahown on hgurc'25. The and the bridge and embankment have been tailor
bridge is locatedwellabove high water, the approach made to fit the site. The arrangement
will acoomem :
:embankment on the IPA is set at`about -the 75-year' madate any flood that is likely
to occur with a mini-:i `rt,
IL
Rood level, yet there ix adequate, sight dlstnnce mum of damage. Computation
of flow across this ,.
46
...

I
r�r �i�puGicl,l/ 'wlil� 'Grl��lh III
f~�
ay
-
,nrlEr lr..
11
,', ..
PERCENT 50.9m¢RGErvCE D/H x'100'
96 '� 98 so P2 P9 66 P6 90' 92 99 % 98._
1000 'Nl1
(
_
�!
q
l
I'
A
4.
- H IN T
e
O6
OVERALL'O= C'i LM�2.C;/Ct
..
�
2t
i aceI—
0306
��..
N
.�
3.3.04
_
g
zl
R
3.90
0.6 w
:
014 ols 0.18 Can 0.22. 024 0.26 0.25 0.30
Y
H�/ II
aHi pal
..
gyp. L3A
—
d.
3,x-
-
t+ 29e—
MOTE: USE THIS CURVE I`OR FREE FLOW
COEFFICIENTS WITH H//RATIOS(015.
A
290 —_ 040
,6 (� 12 L6 2A 29 2.P 32 ].6 40
�P.6 12
..,�
Qr�0,1 HE:0 WI ROADWAY HIU FEET '
Fill 911 0' :I:n IS L"r HOW n.cr n ndeuy vm Lunkn rime.
,F
port, Me, on Intentalo 70. A profile carobs the .throughout. This is the ideal valley crass section•`-'
I
valley looking upstream ik shown on figure 2.5. The and the bridge and embankment have
been: tailor '.
hridge is located well nhnvn high water, the approach made to fit the sites The nrrnngcment
will accom= T._
embankment on tho,'c Itis act e6 about the 75-year medatc any flood that is likely to occur
with a mini-:
-
flood level, yet ',hero Is adequate sight distance mum of damage. Computation of How across this,',
46

i
1, 13r/ow s ,'a p/� of /he o 'o�v/ f/o ✓:/e'. IDh
f .. .
hi
l�G io!/io ��� .7`4e • /$"r� civ//� ront-hr/t ..�'/aw,6�•vg .. .��'�
0614/ {/a w s t�•'�Yyf.�....,.. t
�r.nroa<.Ir/ Se rordya� c,.a�yw, F� �O ��a�..:, y.,iH 'v Pa1�;•.
- -_j flw=µis-F✓+; 'Fvr'z�.�Oq.c.
Iv
.it'a
1 I 1
{
I
r
op
Taly l n«, q,o=/KIF1
- i5h-
i
i
i
II
i�
I
-FAwse,,' s
`/ N•zs �•50
I
H /welt G/ry/'l+ I f t

° jev-.rn06i--�own3//,e I�y�c/C _ 14' iJ✓ L•��C�i PC ��c�G In i5 J
1
OW, . Volt" ".The f6,P,o-Alm .,s�
J
4'0y Of /e wfSi 5����eN �o ��Ni%nCf4leb�a !/i NS
'•
1
TLl- iHP 6✓iL� 'f �'PGE �4W1 � /J SG�,U hJ/ e GdP]'. G.I �P
L• •
q
6u)KU `�'..:
i..
•-
i
'0 VI �n5 61�' %[F cvr �?. 4[6'' 0'F /i /7.i �'Nii �. -
W
..I
f
PLO,lh Wig c� sty
;��
1
I.
1
�
• f � doll"
l•0. 3,035 15/ 8
r
I
oil
� _.
j
1
11 o,�yd
, �
73e/
1
� 10- �F l
m'/l1W V'u /`P','I rOlr. �u -�P4L V/i'N P✓P%���/w-Sl/��.1
Gar/ Fdv
ZS•��avi
45.
/00,
µ a,5 s S•5
1
{
I
#
1
1•
:.

::_t.. ..
PERCENT SUBMERGENCE'D(H XIICO
�It V .
76e:' 7a BO "62 "89 66 88.90 "-92 94 96 98 lOD
,pC•'�}rA:,_
ALL
L-I..
AA
t _
.. U.
.... C
... .. .
f
0.9 •..
ALL
POP
OB
I
Li a.
ZF
OVERALL D=CILH]/; C,/Ci•
t
ALLL
A-310
0T'• J,
- A
I., ALLi 3,08
x1.
V
Id
L
i
3A0
I
O6 •.
0.14 O.I6 0,16 020 0.22 0.94 025
ow C.30 t
f
t
06'
3
..t
_
L. SO2A.
300
e
P.
3.
J'298
a
NOTE; USE THIS CURVE MR FREE FLOW
..
�+
LIP
COEFFICIENTS WITH H/I RATIOS
v rn,'� Z'2.%
D.4
}a . 2.92.i'
A ..
-
- _ .... -- 2.90
/
L-LLJ I-- C I 1
,
0 09
.
16 ae - 24 - '28 32' 36 PRO'I
6i MEA00N ROADWAY HIN FEET '"
i
tAt
0.3
..
d Flguru K—Dbr.La.ge coefficlenuI Tor now oadway embankments.
A. 1 PA
-PAP
1,.A.
port, Mo.,-on'Interstate 70. A profile across the throughout. This is the ideal valley cross section
,'
valley looking upstream is shown on figure 25, The and the bridge and embankment have been.tailor
. L`-�
�biidge is located'well above high water, the approach ".made to fit the site, The arrangement will accom-
embanJ. kment on the left is set at about the 75-year'inodate any flood that is likely to occur with a mini-
. 'flA.
ood level,yetthere is adequate sight distance mum of damage. Computation of flow across this;.x`
•. .. 46
,

i. Fwr?Sr�r? C " , 1 `0/ Fvu�ucr
1Chp�A,dkoj 6;:)
i��,� � r 'Lp !%C!/1�N7 � :V'��ldG� ri{1' G�.'�C!' Cf 1� (•Yi • ' G lil� '[�oi�l• � .�i `=,F`' 4. �T , -�1+ ����� // l�`
h - •. � ... - / fr7 CJ� rl �. Or'� ..•C.�.Pf�{�_..►-Ua'!s'l ,� _ .-
�.f ti•;s �57r ,1/�/G'� r 7'�: k u'��'�;1�' i,: •� .. c �, pe c%a•,-�' Cc) J� r'Yu /s
• , f� /�� P vwr /u �� .' !%f /v. i'� � � ,�`�'rt 7�'; vl / 'S �• ', � y '% . ' � ' f •� i J `� � .:' � • � . - ,t .,
.� � �! } ..Ci , (/ GG✓.�7f1j7 :C`e.t' yr r C.r�K /'tie%$ t�� �, 44 '
o e,d �1 aec4
#Qv 'r �!'t9 14 �- %sr'4 OrY✓_ ��dir!;✓`. ;u i
•GH�CIt:L`'lf-a,V✓1'- ,'/' �' E�+�• , � �•�+ r
P7 2. / j' ii �. C ili/J s %� ti P l�,,r„1 i'ia.lisr/ .. -.r i ✓.. . I
� �.,;�}W --: ;•- .�`�rri'.trift ���y��I/��'h� �tiP�i� �a� •s, �.�.�r3�5� :z.��� c��w,�s/ .-��:}
315
1 3 CJrded ��� s!►�/raw-IdW' . s
Oct I
r � E
}�
the wv/pv r 5, Sys, 1--v4rl� fo nv�r7��• JhP rupr/yvgr
1 f Hwy 3i �rT: T J % h P 1!' �u lv c /i%� }C• q/ !/AJ�
i
• - .� _ , � I ��3' ti - -; � �'� urn `inns � , /....: _{.. .
1 /.; .
Nr451 G�PG�C C� r �r ft+lr f %o`i/ G�NUr7 rd+►� , �?
s
& 3' b /v

aid J,
' O� ; , r u e (JYV�f / I 1I ' rri al:m ss.h 1C1/1 w ` n
GGh7r✓e/1irf, 6� /� //. t /� dufrt
J'
. ve
! U.U6 z '
. _ � .. �� �� �� � hP Uri'u >E�r � .`.� � �" 5 � , �-ao r/�/ �� � is � �r,� � �iA �'am�/u:.� ' ;• .
/a. lc. ;r'va A,I I� �rc� LC V Al-
to
2/3
14 4'7L 4..
- /VU/P, �CI�Cy%u✓�iNS a,�s:rrt� .
,I� „ 1• �{�/UCIr�� .I{5 . ' 9' � _ %i�.'I• .`�'�/,SP fr7a k.i�3/,p� _'"
TC��P,c��"• Glri"><J.Lr� ler,a��•1.GfJ.N•/;//di/l•s. %�� r
fro%w115j10p. cal e of! A , C me .4.,l the-
�PIvC,'�y GYe d•U�p7-{� QYJ/,.sft/Sr•G, !�T G+'<,�t oC' r�4hi ,r�T' ,o%� I`'�Pti•e �
!!� �J y/( �aF, �• �.,'fI, r� f fly w G dNr/,'�`: dl.,� mi, f'!i/ the 'clC G 4 u'Hi -
i f!�%J/f)j�f" 4l /17 i' /(I a¢/ L`L11, Fri.. vr, lS %L�f 1'J•+O `✓%�' iC�vPc.- Gny(,. ��dr.� vl '/O,S {'�G/rp�'}. Lj
i �i ad ! /r 4.4 Trfl{ri

;�q,";.1�:w1'-uG•Or1.wj:•S. LK.: lk..r"=':'i`9 �*'�. "� tart•, �L* ?;.iSp, Is �...f +. �� °,ri'�"�'rT�Y� .v� fr•'r• .* �,'. � �{"fr." , 5^. ��, S: ryrl ri 11�4��'�a,���. .�'�
L i tf'Y t } � N W' ' r• �' �C - i G M 7 c-1 �' t
vT '..,t sf LwC rk r. � � •7 1 , ! s ,JG r •• r e � rr"sp�•', ��•'
i yQ r;,F� tr g .•ra J �q. �. � 1 'G G { 1 ,y, a �i I e N 11, "`r nr.. .'�'
'3T""7'^"""M'�4%4ta•""•`,�.i �.�G t;''.�,,,, ,a. ..�, 4 r s t! - r i Jry ' '.., .• •w«. .r ry'i " �, ' ;. r•�7a''
� �• 5f G . i'1 .':.. <{• • ', T r hr i-t'1ti ?5 S+<.ti, ,� r .. L,, i � G `. x , ,. l Y ` � J
•• 'V_i�xf } T <� r5. ( _1 -; Y ��i'j C K -G 4f •_ „frY ~14 F' T �
ft , h" -` 1L a � i r ", - ! - t 3^a^, •� st ,r• !< - G .r. t „t_ ,� ;r rJ n,.l.., ,G'f'.
e.
f i• +,r .r-i Ih^+� , ,,..r '. .,.« - ... .rA ri� :.r;^k .''�'�-Y...� L . s. „{. r +, : s r - .w, r-.,.. , e "'" _ ,: b �..,.r+•'h , ��
W iLt, i d""' t � t � '• � ' .. x: f z �. i ti ; _ ,r •. ' r ' ' � r V1i w t 'jyF � i� , r �
IV
4 ,r .; r'v[��lr�u e' 6�`y�• .1����, l.is�'i�,�C',� �$a�".Y,S'� �°� � `-
�r{ . �. � ' u, r• . , � i G'] � � �' d LV 5 � ✓'P/r+r'! ' S�a p ��GC-�..C,_,V.��1C�, Q �•I(// / � f� � � fj'� � �. ° i ' ����
x u"I
4y ,. �A �i ,Ali t ' ; -.. •' 3 j`: "1°�, rYrs. i< �. h < '`� 34= ' - C* t d 1�i1 ,n
�1F,+TG' 3,`,y� ��",Fr•{tt� r �„hi• y2 r.;, r. •r � ,- ,.'" I', ;. 'y � • f.'L
�'�i-���'�tif �,.;,r•r"'s�, r,IC •COS•Q�. �U'yJ.� .a ';�I �.k j4y�
% ! j f Il P.,yl - J.. J. S LL_ r - 4. . • . , SS � �
GAY' �4� I!' /J„�'I�'ft'iµ,�� Y � `,f• n , •�� ]'S 'T rl ��b n
y E"i1 ♦ �vl � 1^1 r- rJ//�/} a 1 ,�1 7/� 'r c/ "' �J �. , • R4f � P h,�y�y 3�1
r s. ,Sth;`yyr:I`F r, c J 1 r C...'. I G I `--�;4 yJ �. -� ✓! L'I (J� . . • . , d t r�jFris ` �j
J5' i 1;� 'ry, t 4i+, nd�y "'zy yar it :,' "., .� ,. • 4 ^� fir r"' i4a" �'s, re
�a "¢ i �Stl�-��•��"�irr hµ� �' � 1, .,,� e . , , s r f • .. ., 1 1 ` '' r�� pL,'�G �.`�a' ;�
f °a s� 7k y ,j�Fs � •'•^ J (� r s �- ' s ry��'�,' 'j''�. t'i.'S tj '���
Grp"
rtl.�� � ,r {�� r �rJfN4.; 3 fC ,h ! �. - s•r ,ti_ti, : G' , ! d !
r�4 ��i. is�rj c2��•IMe����i�r��}-rf rf w(fk41*ub. f!' !, I - ,C'7.. ,. J; 'YG- b rt`. �ii' f.IJ ��, �N��Y �lp`
ib�-S�J{rV��^S ��'�'�,§'!�-'' F kl .,.r�11-' /• n `*'.pF 'G r�. / �•l'..'' �Zr �Oa •� _ - 1�. ' ;��G�tys,,��t7r•j 1, �.���TF
i i s lyi, �, r ,- ra 't .f i '' .. _ •r r_ �b �1 µ i i�-�• �+Z
}i('r��' J�I.,����.�w�' r.y ,j-.tr ',! :.I� �I ley`„^ • r _'•r i- -._ i;-, . r' J "' �.• r. r ��r'�i aii •�_4l�,
rv><�" � a���'G .,.k� fYry� �759 t _� I . ,,• ,' ' •` � '.. A J vs �` r�! .r'����i"K`�iy
T ,�_' tY.f,> _ � _ � ..t..-- In • t - ..s ' \ "�'Jrw' i iw ay ff:'X'[ i,�s�r. 1
c i¢�yy M is r -—= �x_� 4 ...s.:•.eS�ih.�. a2 +r i Sri. s":
44
G,�4}h.,r r.�'t`.b � a �• l �� WF f ! ti P,,` t ,r s r.f • _ ', :+ R� ?5 7 ►+ h'"
..� ! .',�3tiI ✓Ur!�(:-. Vq�//-/LM'f�..a I'r v,/j..JJrS,�;, , ••Y( �lrvr dV,P+-- uLtX T1` 'CNf�j
'dam,,� •�•�,! r 'yam,- / o' ;1 i ' -r '4�4'.,,l.,
�',ST'A•�� r a yi"f?'i c f fphi ,. . "- � ' „s '_' , � a a.% t+G'i• Y: . 1 • �' � �:,�41 :: i+Y GEC � , 't,
tz� t i�J 1'7_ i�'j'(d l , '� •'w G s r . t Y'�. t:. I � � �, �•FaJ1'Jf' , 141.k'•�,�-Gti
Cf� ���� '� ��'�' f ' J � � r v � t4. ,+ , r 1 1 _ „ R 1 '' ly 5Y 1r "1f_i•.�,G,�� t�rc`t � � G
'4t.�iYM�F 3,• 1�;55i�Po'Y �F S' G.� of C ` V"•S 1a� rl} �� .•,' r'�� { ~r���1.
l i'�'�,�ja, s� s+�y, I r x>j �.,s , �~ • s ., "' ` [ ' ' r. .1 dU
st } �' !� tI A v r r' Y1 C Cj i,"C r� �C v� 4 U."
�s ��r� ' T�t {.• �. .�G S'1`.r• ?/I _ / .7r (f.,3.'' I 4t�yyh��'tr „��'
!r� lam. w 4 fS y`�iri � ' � ;d>�:N'!'� 'f s � ,�ft�•`
1 i _
V
IMiii'�F�;-
i;; r
h
(1sby3.�i�yy�t�' f bi t•,• f3 �. .� J I. L�%/ � CJ� (�� i✓ Y! S �Y ��M'1; ,�,1� � 4 r'J l �"� / r-t'r v � i L� �` f/ iiGi/yI ?�i1��� a 3,. �, r
�• � r n., � tf 4 _ 1 / ' �`,�' L7 G� a lr r � ,,�- � y x�f ; n
�'!^•�� ;,�ri!! 4 �V✓I � .-v �`�`l.✓NG .�/Qa.s J'I �1(�.' P t ! !/ a GIVI 5��� �' 5,' ! �4tj�r�'`�c..;s�
w! I Pil. �ler(,�LP O l.- "I WCP k + I ! tf r �'tr•,,, �.
rv! 'rY'l gr.y-{7lpr� i3 sk3 t 'it' �' ° - , _ _ _ •, - � •�, � y� t � � ��h {j,
I �•,I.��it1',7t h �'JN'a" , ; �r� f• / ,' / • �. , . / .•7 F ' .I fh��JI��F `4 �� 5 7'
�,n,�:��"a���(4•�,�°. t 'G - l In •_ �rw � �• I fj� � ! { 'C�r. /. 5, Z�' ��f� � J'f' .� • 5`X �' .� ..f''`..{"( �S ! J� L T s173S� Yi �Tr t,
LaIG y�:j�:f�lY,sY.r M,I r :!! .. " - `., ,: 'r , r :J � �Cr'jh i'ysh w>;rgFr","7•
��,'�l��^1y,-a,r : r, - I'll ; ..l.'' y .�, � ,-/4/ �,�,C.�,y�I.� ,,r%•I c�-• �� S�X � 5 ,Y. �. �rS Gfj:�l J,,�,i �r-�f��, T �,
n1 ,
?4, !• .., ' ' 1 • ''G . ,1 _ - , %• f F".`t k i .�L'f i-t.>�• � ^
I 4:5i'rltttG+''��r'•."''i - " ^fir J J (.r'n. ✓4#•
1� i f�J � ,t4 �! (/' �^(� ` � 1'�a ( L� �%{ 4 »> / plr C.�� �lr yp Jr.C� � � � � � I l /�i �'rf_" 1�2'� 'Q [ t,,•�'� '
L A,r,� �t� ti _ G 1G v E �� � � I L i`I .J rf 3 �' r �-•
j� s ,.(� k�tia . ,fir. M - : ✓/1 - r� � r; Y� ,.
l 4 S r�.5
co t-, VwV��; U[` �V!'C.� . ~✓ �� : ,r��'
.. -.. I ^i .. - .. _ _ ..:,v��'"."".:-.,.�.-�-�-r-�•r--•� .. _ --�,5;wn...�..r-.•a• wry,=ww:.r�i.»..r;i•_

f i- A
F .: xi Ik tA0'i/ k = *�' sSR7Y,G :.x
.i tih N:r� `�
K
t
u1
��.
sxFFF,Lw .�i FIFF,Ft - a r y l "F
Y +
•' II.I.T..
IJy
IF
OF IF:.J.
f/eC P'IP,.�IIiGSACi�
4IFF4
! �115.
IJ' �'Ph
•'r
IF IF
,,//
'(' 4�Pf1 ~*�Se x 4 $. — F i 5 `JilSfo 1Sz0 Yn 'ntrn4» i�ry
1 I k..
.
¢V,_IF
�41 ze
IF I
IF
a.10 IF
o 333
'=o,q�,,s�z�o,�s� IF
JL'
IL
I
1z
ss—_ ln:�e'SIF
;:
,akIF
�W
M1IF
IF
n (G3,43)
IF ':
F
%i-3-4�
I �: •,
l.
F
IF IF IF
FF
FIFFIF
I> WIto
I
I
y
IFIF
ti
IVL
0333
IF
f.
...
PIF I IF
I.
LIFO
IF FIF
IF LIF
IFFIF
i
ry ,I
-s
O Jtiyq��Jro G3 u3 t S,i�®);'IF
I
IF
IF
IF
IF
e.� P C���am5 ,
4 °
;.
`'
IF-
0 p$- PYo,$eJ„I� GT. �f�r��.. G
GyIF
IF F
I
L AIL
IF
IF IF
IF
pt
F F '
IF 1p S A..
K
-
-IF
IF I IF
, .. ,.
�'OF

zw)
'Al " If ". -'- �" —, ." ""ZI '—', "I'- I ,.— I — "I". " I
Ov
Ntn
64m
4
vIC
t
Ip
"AA,
qI is IL el
W.
4,
ev
Ira r$1 r
Y7
di,
0
VI*•
eq it
a A
"Id
01
ft
Ve ct tv. .,l/
0
tit) ly
ff7

y
• N �
1 li
!Y
4 J
1 t.x_ r a•,
1. �
f a 4'+'z.k
�+y.y, �s>.+^+... Ys ,.?
a h'^+^l' ...1 ,.-..,n �. ,. � -ro +'> ;Sx se )-.^. �...,:: a
. *bh+r 41
I . w° I i 'y
t5
i; t:it` ...e. Y
ti
r E. W vt S'iY K.�'•
A
1+<M1,
I
kk
r
3� _. �` _ • _r�Y_r7l'D �f-v!�°--`�('�✓.��Gllt.�1:L6
(.�,.� r � a x
�'�.r i .0 �.
•��
� t _ _{/
OV
i
j'r `.i 7
✓ ��DCIi !_l / S�
Cr/Ik
I r
:f�dW �✓'�H'1
a 4i
.a.-«+.inVo-te..
/_5 :u�3� 1�✓�-',.
\
5_
v,
•1� .411
:4 1
t
t'/. N M(/ •r/P /UG i'%d (J �• �jrN�`/f/ v'oH'�YI � S�.'l��
al 5
3
ff-
M1

6'S5°'," ..*r..�f`r
1 aCrxs;rl li zt fr.r.t ..
rs
rrrr
v,
,N bf'4
Pti
p �1
F err
i,
p qq
CII IG IfP S I�YNrn a A"r�a:'}.
".yk" SIOpN�+ /J F/C /1 PL dO ✓✓l
t Y4L
ICI%,W 3/.S
:I t , :....
PG ✓'u�P "./ �� Z�ii.fr'Ft
F
/ P4-%yrul roil- bl 'S'b-Of Cii P4S (/OM
f.
t.,,-
G,1^.iliewl IJdph%1 /S:
�;; fIt'd'�,r:
hk'
I Id
kf
I.
=44=
Anp
bw/ p. {{61t• ow se CAa
45,1 40i ,.....
f
n.
N, ti �. f31gJ �i f.v�
��u �'evP L, r' m.
_ P�L1.
�S
mJ
q14 c �� n� /'�,S ahn
ba® tP./m v� Eonf. l'
t
I/+. �Q �IuN A. HS Gft�y LAPS ss/ �irowwl.'H..
IV
12
vPloc1 �� S
j,
•, ;
.'
III

,.
„z .v.�44 3hR. .," «-e _. Y'u:•
�C
� ,d%�a^'
A9 4�01/ Jricv
.•'.
:I
t
` •.0
{
uo.GN /F S. ., .�1 .fGVPPN,x 4Ji Ci,>.Cl4 ivr'. '.7r _'
J�
C ✓ry�N IJrr/ OI IS fiP J�Pv.n SS �. ie l/f�m Li'yr a r+'F
..v
?`
,'v
/uhl �f`�5 �•_p -� Os�1� OT'. V'`� was/ a'y 'r t •s '.`.r
.,`C%S �Pvj. . e. �.'.
N
--f.(—NfI�L. {l?IPW( [JDN/ u .lunil ✓!5 ij.G� I✓t S�,Sh /yIQ JO IIR� / 5'�r'.isT�. '�
r
10 ���S CC_�St�P'loP {laa•evP �• Yu�d�.. �i fl.sf�S '. u
� r „x
F•v'� Vp �u&+! O� -h rr Cl!'.,G%G/ Or'N.'h6�fJe `�'{ y
�'�F. •£�A6r��yy,
�
.Li. /.P � %7L Y'b4JwX S N!/ 1 x✓' :. C G. v.• ® N 2 3•
? 1
{
is - i mm.-. 1 .: .. �,,,�® 1�''A •.\ P k r'
µ
Or' 6✓, K''G G/P[�!/lllMlr /^/+C'".�OC'Pdb'✓G'GCPSG
L-'_4f_-L'%` A~'
1 �� }
I�iV• L/a .L S�.'L v/9/O�/v'I �..O N� af`
LkrC GYPNr./IO�Vi•!%/ .m;.4lr.
RKE�r
rRT V'S fi
cL
N
A
W
LC'Iye
' L�� VVr
rrk r;yt
r
u,
-�
;
Al
{iA i� 4 '� '�. °I[ Kl`y4 �J rYa }".({' . 11•..
'f fo - i `+"if.
7/f�i�"
,I{1"..',p}u.. r���.'i 4�_ h�d�iulrG 5✓4�JN� y/ts lrs .ii C L✓hevi ;.7 VPr� 79ur+,3 iT'�r ly'vc
r"� TTn.{. L ry» 1iLu 1bd
�".:, t tf Ge'�i/ irei� •GCCer. S /. f4 F�.r- � Or w r .evj�1<.-
wr
I IL I1�— __ � r .•.
41 fi r

zit ' l
_ i.F•,L ., 'r
.w,. i^ `R% e
M VILi�y
*k1sf:
rs^,
, d
P.
w�Y:.
...��ciS
m `y
<t
-•`LJ1UIn IP d1 IYIH//Pvr/bl-. 6b,</C:•
A r
t { d.�✓4.Sf�y
ON /l!/Sle 2A/7P f'IPLKI. /j NI C�' �y�go//y
it ^�
�a NI
P
' .oV'..�hP S�o9P OH fRP.' L�owy3/apP o� 7:w5
is ��� .OS
�.:-
V"y aMfi/e.�:/S a6ey7° /DP 4';:'�
, ,•,
.��
1 e_.. -
>•u re�G;'US-4rJ v- �, .t /vv`./+ra)rf 4�/1
4
d r^
SPP,
-` �`' _--'-.. Mean.Stone Size dso, fi
r F^ . 0� tr0 p9e O0
e
43
0
`d
o
39
N
o�•
a
o,.
m- S5
" 3I'
■I■■■Y®B
�men
■��
,i�l�
�■�InONi■�■o:®���■
■�1
!�oe■����■■■■a����i■■
■11■I��II�!■■ol1����■
Mean Stone Size, dso, ram
-
rw.•.,Flgura
B.gSH Angle of repose for different rock shapes and szas'• -
-
r�Wdwol w,'th: z- /s'W, 6 Arfp. r
Iti
cjtiP�k on'
Il-OL
5•.4-���iG.
/(%w,p
pcp✓e6f-

""�S3' to .�{ c..•
...:.r-.ao.*rti:, r w^ r y;' f . � 11`� T k1'...
.
i ;.
.r
> >
"t^ w M1 Y {aY
.tr.-Plc.l�' �u ua� wi' •��ia4°�o
/ nb. ✓oaJ /-w•ih /6 �r/r c Mq /03foSY(Mk
>:
i .
4 tI sl : dP N s�, P s ; �e . LL41
fh
„
�m wPl yew p1-reL/r're yY?:2 Sr2E '
,,..
'. do/e yr �/'o A*-./eio .zr• r. v.7/
/. S he �..
�.Sx ,S x'3.�cy�s,o� 3• Yew If, tiPs
yula e w!.'Syi�/�fPrfieS,'arv.v%/Lr%Pc'
€ 4.
�.
f
J L
G. - P/r'. 't HNVi/'� '�✓'. V>GC 7L �r.S S07/O' i w:+ ��
_occP/.v.Y,',.h.rL�sr�-'!�
.. '. .M
0.�/O-A
p
- �.,�-.N
1.
..
_ ..' _ ..

i
OS 0
y
fw 4p -P»y' J/.'7.n -L0499n' :-n
n�
.•i
0
,
`fib 4� �,
r�r.�
+ h'£%u'R'C•O
r- ',�
o£11ar
'
wN
« I
a
90
3
�sr A
,
A11
ld
-, "CZT'"yi�'-ffd�06
e'INdn/4H 4w'r5n1d`�..i✓iI9 b .'r.,y n.i �'-' �n
eY
r
t �

t- i„ i =A�
.fC.�V 'M^x'R� ""`d • ,: F • P.' �'yt"_` �'."T"�.. [ F�i
Ilk
R
h.
/rI/rrc/r C/oH�
IL
Iv
pl
�Va�rn.ec�p. oaild���/1�,�,irc./ orr-.-I:vr C4/vP�:y57o�- , 4%' %O-%�fH •F�.
a✓ ./ e fw�- !s"c/� rhP H�..d, to P; ii 6e
If
Sff-'c.NL�.-F/aw'yz.�Pr/.✓�/6e'/3 z5`fY3�,SrL �'%i- � � ,
3
�wYh Cvlrv�Fs u�,.c/ G�6`ff�rrc �O. rarh c✓/vr�7�--
��J,F///VHIHlCO H/hut. // G49 le Y/ 4V4
a k� ��'/ yd u ��- h«o�� Ca/✓P�� sir/.fi
;.
rid
Fuld F',✓ a .�6a6 , tye r �✓;�// a //,> 2r-a/.el;0
1
.
IS Yhin%mi�A_u5p v.t bxf1 ._s.hdf� Vf>` /1�%dHl�_
o.
Z, v/V1

1
i '
4
kk
/NL/f/L''- �5/%li El/NLI�/IT/Z1V
TbP fvq ��� lJonr/i_w P�%,a aC. LryUor/ws�/�(..ar�clfPdro�iH
Lam 6e--- r�rrYsGJ_�'r_acetx' P r��/�arP owssS
.
70
.,
�%ro P�ia7�'
.. ,
a
Ac VIP
Ul7sf:row o'f' Yr/oriKP/r.. tkvrfh 7-/s"�+�1
' -_
_�/_./�6f✓ruw./" r_mJa.�y wa'th /ff'� cv/�r4f — 2; D �
1
rngkt GVPWs
i
f ° .
U
'
IY $ ...
.. ...
... 0, Ul(!�j%) /a.O'%bC'fI�$/fir �,•`..
t t
.—
!,a
Ur/yi.-.una��- r�ad...ayw��h 1.r6"�rca/�o�f'
•, J
.k
1
I 1-�Gi�P. 'r4 r_( <, a✓PG /,r li /iV .: /'/ G�✓�'

IA � i '_
L , iir . Yr ,.,_ I ,)
art JUL 2 91992
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES Edmond John Maguire
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary July 28, 1992 Regional Manager
NOTICE OF MINE PERMIT DEFICIENCIES
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Cherokee Sanford Group, Inc,
P.O. Drawer 458
Sanford, NC 27330
ATTN: John Burns
RE: Brickhaven #1
Chatham County
Deadline for Compliance: 10 days
Dear Mr. Burns:
As we have discussed, this is to inform you of deficiencies
with respect to Mining Permit No.rI9-08-1:ssued to your firm to
operate the subject mine located in Chatham County.
On July 23, 1992 Debbie Barbee and myself inspected your
mine with you and Pat Shillington and determined that
deficiencies exist with respect to one or more of the conditions
contained in your mining permit. The deficiencies that were
observed at the time of the inspection are:
Operating Conditions 3 and 4: The active pit area
does not have adequate sediment control. This condition
also applies to the access road creek crossing.
Significant erosion and subsequent off -site sedimentation
have occurred. Although your permit has expired, you
have a renewal application currently under review.
Pending completion of our review and issuance of a
renewal permit you must protect the site consistent
with the conditions of your old permit.
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Telephone [phone] • FAX Number [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Aoum Employer

Mr. Burns
July 28, 1992
OA
In order to bring the subject site into compliance, the
following corrective actions must be taken:
(1) The new sediment basin with brick bat dam proposed
for you by Pat Shillington must be installed below the
active pit. I have done a preliminary review of the
design and it appears to be complete and accurate. I
have forwarded the design data to our central office for
addition to your current renewal application. It should
be noted that the foundation under the entire brick bat
dam must be stripped and prepared to ensure the stability
of the structure.
(2) A suitable brick bat dam or acceptable alternate
must be installed below the active fill area adjacent
to (south of) the access road.
(3) The access road creek crossing must be repaired and
the turn -outs and brick bat sediment traps must be
restored at the outlets sufficient to prevent
further off -site sedimentation.
If the above deficiencies are not corrected within 10 days
following your receipt of this Notice, an official Notice of
Violation will be issued.
In addition to the corrective actions listed above, the
following maintenance/repair work must be carried out in a timely
manner to prevent further sedimentation problems:
(1) The mulch on the recently seeded area is very thin and
must be improved sufficient to provide a ground cover
sufficient to restrain accelerated erosion.
(2) The eroded access road extension must be repaired and
a slope drain should be added to convey runoff to the
base of the fill slope in a controlled manner.
The responsibility for understanding and complying with
the conditions of your mining permit rests with you. The
responsibility also rests with you for notifying this office
of your plans to correct the deficiencies. Please note the
additional comments and recommendations contained in part 15 of
the attached inspection report.

i
Mr. Burns
July 28, 1992
3
Please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Barbee or me regarding
any questions you might have about this matter.
cc: Tracy Davis
Tony Sample
Sincerely
hn L : liol ley , Jr., \. t . , CPESC
gional Engineer
nd Quality Section

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, J(jL 2 9199Z
Division of Land Resources, Land Gustily Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME )G " N6� 2. MINING PERMIT
3. OPERATOR _ ittaLlp4. COUNTY�7F;im+ 1g
5. ADDRESS AIC o U
6. Person (s) contacted at site 6 4 TD
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? Yes 01 No 8. Pictures ? Yes No
9. Date last inspected: l�/9'r— 10. Any mining since last inspection? QYes �No'
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit El Yes Q No
It no, explain:
�- j Gm./O177atlS rL6' /`L Siµ„N >•7qt L7 71t S=iINE /�i
n�2 /Aar /NSPE c�7o.ri . '7'tiw: z_72 VI Ayt.ya@ i},Oo,Ec
Cd141 TThs
CAOTr ,?,JI 01-261
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? ©'Yes No
If no, explain: ' '
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oflsite damage ? Yes No II yyes, tlescdbe the type
and severity __ of the d/aLmrage: V44" VL/6d�r Soir, I•o<c �6,ew. .47a r/sr'
MLfr/1 . MA04�.i1'!1L t� / aSC CMeLK P�O.Ci/,✓(
14. Corrective measures needed and / ortaken 56Agov CbF n fr 4464 z 31
AmIb.J uM 7766) cr
liS Le..✓ III . A CJi rWvV,*� C1I r/l/Qf'+ /3 lb -so
_�TJ!`
NAeAOL RGr o..J 7wI A-v r,rs Fir r ✓jfI Sosoy� fW! - f/-V✓,h_
IVf.1I �S An/ F EaaN7U
15. Other recommendations and comments: EJo2L•- It i n6 k
S'rAISlt_ ZAi�e �./){!6P 2p.I/T/I°T &I NaRw'N OF`
/hJP MM.�
_wla.Vu er nF�/tCCS /}T 7H'£ Aw1T SiiY- N�.�CT
eWn.l1ur" /tJ
A 7) rl _f M,4A(AI YL. of '7'1 LnF./x.,
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map accurate ? ❑ Yes I] No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? &Yes No Proposed datey 1/0 1 IM
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator 7 t 2 61IP2,-.
�y� �� // p�p� --77 (date)
INSPECTED BY: Voi}!.� 44bi.1�-riIT�61r 9494f� DATE:1! / 9y---
Phone No: (717) N-? / —467 oU / 9 % 30 —// 74"
White copy to file Yellow ropy to operator Pink ropy to Mining Specialist
area
-Xii

•
• •, � _ .
1 1
' � ~
.� � ! ' - � ' � I.
+ x J • . 1 • f � E
r _ � L' �„/
' � , - _ - -.
� � .
2 - � , i `
i _ ti �
y
_ � i
- � � . d _ -
� _, r, �
� �
. i � � -. 1 _
r � � � � -
_ � _{ ,. ..
. � ,•
� �. � `
��k � i
_ . `
� � � � 1 � V.
� � ' � r ! � �
� r _
- � r '^- t �
� � _ � � '�
.�
C ,• J � 1
-y (� � � � -
_ t
11
V

LAND QUALITY SECTION
PROJECT: 8(L1 ({-f(*V#,V Page zof Z
F4"F
JUL 2 91992
2ur1aiF. 77y* Akcd-ss A. A-po cAo-cri&/6
INSPECTED
73/ 92 —

P
*� 0 . �e)x
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, '" 11. J' Vr
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section --'1�
WVL
MINE INSPECTION REPORT :r111(�.
199r,
(PERMITTED MINE) M- • • ! r
1. MINE NAME 34a'f� _ C.1Ri"�H&� J 7�Z . 2. MINING PERMIT# /T"0$
3. OPERATOR C- eib A` " o C . 4. COUNTY
5.ADDRESS ao. P } o �,�./r � 7� Zoo 79/Iw/ 13.,nnl,'
6. Person (a) contacted at site 9?)q-A/ 17a i % / � SFhr_�,Jv z /
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? ®:Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? Yes K No
9. Date last inspected: _62_/_/_aL. 10. Any mining since last inspection ? p Yes ❑ No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Ayes ❑ No
It no, explain:
MT_ tN S 1.10 D/ t/ tjAA:!bOE ibOxt
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? (kYes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offshe damage? ❑ Yes No If-yes-describe-the4ype
and.severity-of•the-damage:
14. Correclive measures need and / or taken: o 73A4fd -
fXtwr H`Fi's f5 F.i.� /NS A.-T�ltUr_.l(�_fLr"/NL'>r /i F/RST
ssr nt c, A-i3��<' �?Jr n�Nuav42.r a.rni-r_ .y+.a-i.✓rE.✓A./cs•
6FG r>i,//cfS n...uSr Cn ntn^/ur A-S a A,F.wi rro✓G.n / nl o,/n.
LsYsr RFFdar. /FL��-.f /r»�o.J a� Aoa�n�.✓.t.— no
15rOthecrecommendalions:anll;eomments: vt�ago i Co s
/nf Ou2. LA's-r'-KFfb/u� SrlJF4577 ZWK--
f2/LnfiinlA>,i ,.A-,s wn✓tT A%4 a iR�c"OA0 / A
%ifi- �EViovSe H .REOJGtTK n r7 of !A c //;R�.J AyA.rliz r^ Cr" 4@ S6i
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map aceurate ? Yes No (Explain) Q- Not. Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? [Yes 4QENo Proposed dale l o 19Zt
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report /L9 19. Copy of Report sent to operator/
�-,I�
INSPECTED BY: VoM'xd /rudx7 / 15p,1 iti4/aZl DATE: 7 123 / A2�
Phone No: (Ttj) ." l —4 7d6
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
SAW
:7
r

Y ' � 1 .+.
`-. �„
1 � `.
i1 1 � �
" ��
n (� � n \ �
�/
` �
.� ' , .� N
� i. .�

0
North Carolina Departmentof Environment, Health, and Nalgl r s
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Sect
MINE INSPECTION REPORT juL
f7 (P
�E
RMITTED MINE) �y�
1. MINE NAME 1��ICli- f./J �t'Z 2. MINWGW MIfQTYY
3. OPERATOR aft ram, 1Nc. 4. COUNTY G Ha481.4+'N
5. ADDRESS .D•'P20e..lrGclt- 4S8 S r*tA0 C 2733d
6. Person (s) contacted at site (GD G cAvJT '
7. Was mine operating at time ql inspection ? ©.Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? [:]Yes No
9. Date last inspected: -4 qq lj 10. Any mining since last inspection?h4444 e®Yes No
11, Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? KYes ❑ No
•If+m�elrylahl:•
J 5 C ,..JEVEot /fkvOE5gwiir of 7;;qr wwk, wl7.V /r4sFl yr
T .0 T [0 7Yo4 D i3lFWAID 7>FE 2 uLF3 5 w /nl
CXLf6rn cPJ£iNx'lr of T+f�
/ S EEDS %!Li c o l t J 146- T 66.%m e
A.-0D M ol3S V/Mo 71! OF 77AE D s 6PE-
Mft/ r Nor SC ceorAeLr-' �I
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? TEL Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? Vey No lf.yes-,desedbe-the•type-
andisevedtyol•the•demage: No .5/6rJ3 ors /st,,, y ra PQS/T� raf .w
?-�'6wlT Mr/JrNG FlzJ>Jl T7s s,' Ny..-+/r J•`_yC 7W D/SGJfiF�E' FAeM /
Z f #f / W E/W 7ZJ 6rD D W*VY OJf` Ra ucLTn-
1=11'vr- �. JENTS
14. Corrective measures needed and /or taken: NUS 5#Pt3itl Ai A.n/7Fr./AN
r/ GETI AG ANo AVj0 � FlUe m- M-r j7G7yr .5 Anf.O JLO/M6/.lT-
A�-L ON-J/AE D¢ Ph JAzE S7>2JG] Q-C_P fANO g-t-A*�
Ou-71&7V -Tb Titi l3¢rc(c—
73A'l L /1T7>Fb' uM+7YLcwaSf_-A'r 13 /.J 7/ M✓.rr-Nn—SC
VSLOPr3 A- f2MM SEOtMGN>- 7Y!-AP Fat. 71hi siz. /SE dFiT4zwlrn_
15. Other recommendations and comments: S N lGAi'Ei0 rJ // ✓Eq /JETvhye<YJ �.J�
T,VeAwtn/4J AND SOPW)Nd �o^�IPUTAi+WJs R4G1.1 � 7D PAPicowls4AZ
MERY 7'I/><. s7w,JOA1eo1 OF CUA(D/rlon/Y-i t/L
(}(t..e A5 EFF6c7>VC AT T/[Z V#N*942 cuc. CuRK�Jr Sr/LJGtv2as (SEC
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Repo 4 / - map accurate ? nYes No (Explain) Not Reviewed
tr AffkAf+s TMR•r 'r t- /aAT r, !3 J �wrnsk' i Nnwf
/z
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? © Yes ❑ No Proposed date % 1 /S 92- t
18. No. of additional pages o1 Inspection Report. 19. Copy of Report sent to operator its 19�
,'�1 (datce)1'
INSPECTED BY: IJ'f i y DATE: �7 I 4 1
Phone No: (ill) 571 -4-7Jo
White ropy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
erev

:VA
Cry

LAND QUALITY SECTION
PROJECT: * Z Page Zof *2,
COMMENTS: ?7 CebJT�lubG 7 Vj4txr- 612o, -o c*VE2 1-1
7k,s a4c�ir
INSPECTED BY: L�/-�1 /7y(.t�`/ DATE: `C; / '9" / /Z/

State of North Carolina
(Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Lind Rcwnvcts
512 Nonh Salisbury Smv • Pi It North C':m',lina 276I1
James C. I�rtm, CJovernor Stcphcn C. Qmrad
S, rnomas RhWLk , Sccrrary Oovec e:h: Jh, 1986 Dimc;ur
CP.1v PIED MAIL
I1171UPhi RECEI.^-T PfxxjSSTED
Mr. R. Mayne Green
Plant Encineer
Chernkeu Sanford GrcuP
P. o. Drawer 452
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
RE: Nc-w CAmwrshi.n/Change in. Ccupany Na-re from Sanford Brick Corporation (Perntit
Nos. 53-05, 19-06 arr? 84-03). e^'' Cherokee Brid: Canpany (Permit Nos. 19-08
and 19-04) to Cherokee Sanford Group
Dear Mr. Green: -
This office has recently received your October 24, 1988 request to have the
above referenced mining permits reissued in the new company name of Cherokee
Sanford Group as both Sanford Brick Corporation and Cherokee Brick Ccmlpany have
been purchased by this new organization. As you have indicated that there will
be no changes in the Operating or Reclamation Conditions of these permits and
have suhcitted a $25,000.00 Ass.i.grmtent of Sairings Account (ASA) and
Certificate of Deposit (CD) sufficient to cover these operations, I am enclosing
the new mining pertnit cover pages for each of the above permits. In addition., I
am hereby releasing the two $251000.00 ASPS and CDs, one that was posted by
Sanford Brick Corporation and one that was posted by Cherokee Brick Company, as
they have been properly replaced by Cherokee Sanford Group's surety.
It is my understanding that there will be no change in the contact
personnel for each site as the plant managers will remain the same for each
Cherokee Sanford Group mining operation. If at any time this should change,
please advise this office immediately to ensure there is no break in future
communication.
K) Res 276 r, Ucigh, Korth Camlmn 1TniI-w�.r It hm!,mt 91A731-3KI3
A_ r...,i rb ,..,,,.nv r,m.....,

Mr. 1? . Ydayne Green
N ovcinber 3, 1988
Page Z
Thark -,,mu �clr your in this matte):- advi,�e Vracy
F.I,avis, .SS1.S+_.::;!.. at: (9.9) +_... 7 ]4 Sf'lOh..(1 tG..
c,licsti.cm-'s on
Very truly your:,
Stc-pllen G. Cnrra
SG,C : `i`M : Sc
EncInsur+es
cc: m . joh-i-, Pal _:iGjh -R�:(j :.:'::al rmgi ec i l',` c=.CVE:.T: pa<C, s
nos. 53-05 , 19-06 , 19-08 and 1.9-0 n )
1, `" . Jer. r Ccc:k , - %1cr_r esvil .c k4c-i orial Enci.neer (letter w/cover 1pa::e `or

DEPARIT,E P OF NA VITAL RPM SOURCES AND C%1MUNITY DEVE10PhEENT
DIVISION OF 1AND RESOURCES
11 AB UAl STY SECTION
P E R M I T
for the operation of a. mining activity
In adcordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Pennit Regulation 15 NCAC
5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Cherokee Sanford Group
Brickhaven Mine No. 2
Chatham County - Permit No. 19708
for the operation of a
Clay Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all Lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Regulation 15 NCAC
5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Cherokee Brick Company
Brickhaven Mine - 2
Chatham County - Permit No. 19--8
for the operation of a
Clay Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

Page 2 of 7
DEFINITIONS
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved
Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception: If another operator succeeds to the interest of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease,
assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from
the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the
Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the
permit to the successor operator, provided that both operators have
complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or other
security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the
purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the
permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in
the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a designated
time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by
the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by
the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Conditions
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by
the Environmental Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until
August 30, 1995 and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

Page 3 of 7
OPERATING CONDITIONS
1. No wastewater shall be discharged from the operation to the surface waters
of the State.
2. Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shall be subject
to the permitting requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Management -Commission.
3. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural
watercourse. A natural buffer as shown on the mine plan dated January 29,
1985 submitted with the application shall be maintained between the branch
and any mining related disturbance.
4. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from discharging onto
adjacent surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity
to the affected land.
Drainage from the affected land shall be directed to sediment basins
indicated in the application for a mining permit and accompanying drawings
dated January 29, 1985 and August 14, 1985. The sediments basins shall -be
properly designed and constructed to meet or exceed the standard type 2
sediment basin design described in "Guide For Sediment Control on
Construction Sites in Construction," U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The sediment basins shall be initially constructed as indicated in the
mining permit application and accompanying drawings and enlarged as the
affected areas are expanded. The basins shall be dipped out when one half
filled.
As areas are cleared, a diversion shall be constructed using brush laps to
filter and divert water to sediment basins.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any
excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage due to
siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with ground cover,
devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of
water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.
7. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between
the mine and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the
operation from the public.

Page 4 of 7
8. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any excavation and any
adjoining property line to prevent caving of that property and to allow
grading of the sideslopes to the required angle. A buffer zone of 25-50
feet wide shall be maintained between any excavation and any adjoining
property line.
4." No Mining shall be conducted in areas not indicated in the approved mine
plan without prior amendment to the mining permit.
10. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
11. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.C.S. 74-54 in the form of
Twenty Five Thousand Dollar ($25,000) blanket bond is sufficient to cover
the operation as indicated on the approved application. This security must
remain in force for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall
not exceed the bonded acreage.

Page 5 of 7
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of
which is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit.
Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the
permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize
the possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of
the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be
provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is
in accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is
suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the
mined area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
b. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan, which
shall to -the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with
mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the
'earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining
on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
STANDARD RECLAMATION:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned
reclamation shall be to restore the sediment basins into lake, areas and to
grade and revegetate the disturbed land areas with grasses and pine trees.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable
for the planned future use are as follows:
A. Any lake areas shall be excavated to maintain a minimum average water
depth of four feet.

Page 6 of 7
B. The sideslopes to lake areas shall be 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter above the water level and 13� horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter below the water level.
C. The sideslopes of any disturbed land area shall be graded to a 3
horizontal to 1 vertical grade or flatter.
D. The bottom of the mine excavation shall be generally leveled and
smoothed.
E. Overburden and topsoil shall be stockpiled and respread after mining.
F. All stockpile and areas disturbed for access shall be graded and
stabilized.
G. No contaminants shall be dumped at the mine site. Scrap metal, trash
or other such waste shall be removed from the site and properly
disposed.
H. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Lime will be applied at a rate of 3 tons per acre and fertilizer (5-10-10)
at a rate of 800 to 1000 pounds per acre. Sericea Lespedeza at 60-70
lbs/ac., K-31 Fescue at 20-30 lbs/ac. and Millet or Sudan at 15-20 lbs/ac.
will be applied to stabilize the topsoil. After one season of growth of
the above, loblolly pine will be planted to conform with the company's long
range reforestation plans.
Selected plots and areas around the fish ponds will be seeded with annual
and perennial wildlife cover as furnished by the N.C: Wildlife Resources
Commission.
Reclamation Plan:
Years 1-4: Mine out and prepare sediment control ponds; build "brick bat" dams;
clear and stump areas for immediate mining. Approximate disturbed area (less
haul road) at the end -of 4 years would equal 16 acres: 1-2 acres would be in
sediment ponds, 1 acre in stockpile area, 4 acres reclaimed and approximately 10
acres would be in active mine excavation.
Years 5--10: Reclamation would proceed at 4 acres per year after year 5 with an
active mine area of 10 acres.

Page 7 of 7
After 4-5 years, reclamation will commence on mined areas and proceed on an
annual basis afterwards. This will allow for weathering of the harder shale and
claystone after exposure making these materials easier to process and reducing
large boulder problems. This will also provide time for mining out the sites
for the settling ponds to the sizes adequate to contain the run off from the
affected areas.
Permit issued this day of %fir y a f 19 �rj^
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development

Cherokee Sanford Gmup
Cherokee Brick Company of North Carolina
Sanford Brick Corporation
October 24, 1988
Mr. Tracey Davis
N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Dear Sir:
c�,k .
111410 oll Qr
n�, 988
ar,7�y j
ON
Sanford Brick Corporation and Cherokee Brick Company are being purchased by a
group composed of the management of the two companies. The new company's name
will be Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated. We request that Sanford Brick
Corporation's mining permits No. 53-5, No. 19-6, and No. 84-3 and Cherokee
Brick Company's mining permits No. 19-8 and No. 19-4 be issued under the new
name. A $25,000 Certificate of Deposit has been set up by Cherokee Sanford
Group, Inc. to serve as the blanket bond required by your department. Bond
documentation is enclosed.
-Since there are no changes in reclaimation plans or conditions of the permits
and since a bond is in place, we request that the permits be issued under the
new name effective November 1, 1988. This is the date of purchase closing of
the two old companies by Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated. Also, we request
that your department release the two CD'S in the names of the old companies.
I realize this release will take Longer to obtain and can not be processed by
November 1. If there is a problem in processing these requested name changes
on that date or if more information is needed to release the C.D'S notify me
at 919-775-2121.
Best Regards,
R. LXJ 0 18 Ua_V
R. Wayne Green
Plant Engineer
P.O. Drawer 458 Sanford, North Carolina 27330 Tblephone [phone]

Cherokee Sanford Group '�1/Ur
Cherokee Brick Company of North Carolina 1-94
Sanford Brick Corporation r;
L
' ll;IL
October 24, 1988
Mr. Tracey Davis
N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of -1-and Resources
P.O. Box'27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Dear Sir:
Sanford Brick Corporation and Cherokee Brick Company are being purchased by a
group composed of the management of the two companies. The new company's name
will be Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated. We request that Sanford Brick
Corporation's mining permits No. 53-5, No. 19--6, and No. 84-3 and Cherokee
Brick Company's mining permits No. 19-8 and No. 19-4 be issued under the new
name. A $25,000 Certificate of Deposit has been set up by Cherokee Sanford
Group, Inc. to serve as the blanket bond required by your department. Bond
documentation is enclosed.
Since there are no changes in reclaimation plans or conditions of the permits
and since a bond is in place, we request that the permits be issued under the
new name effective November 1, 1988. This is the date of purchase closing of
the two old companies by Cherokee Sanford Group, Incorporated. Also, we request
that your department release the two CD'S in the names of the old companies.
I realize this release will take longer to obtain and can not be processed by
November 1. If there is a problem in processing these requested name changes
on that date or if'more information is needed to release the C.D'S notify me
at 919-775-2121.
Best•Regards,
R. Wayne Green
Plant Engineer
P.O. Drawer 468 Sanford, North Carolina 27330 7b1ephone [phone]

t
e
i
t
CHAMPION
INTER'4/�TiONAL
CORD
CHEROKEE BRICK COMPANY 392 ACRES
NEARBY
M ? Ur=, . ! v� Z11� G r�LKN 15
WEYERNAI!SEFZ 2.8 MILES
CHEkM8Utu
}
Sol E -", ,".:u Ct3','.ti` VukLL9r t6ETTE) I
I PdiLES _(
j
f g—y
COTTON
LEO BUCHANAN
( II .
- NOR7 �
1
— {
KEY
n- SEDIMENT PONDS E'
t Foq RUN-OFF DITCH !�
} i
,N7ERMITTErdT FOND +
BERM OR.13ANK
I �
I! 6WAWY AREA 11
II TEMPORARY BLDGa Vkk
- _
! 570GKfILkS i —._ _ — — J 60' EASEMENT f801SE: CASCADE) — -- —��
f j
, Ti i
A ..E 1" -20C3
f 15CCHEROKEE SnNFORDGROUP
F .j 1 CHATHAM CO., NO CAROLINA
rook AW
_AUGUST 1,1988 - I
BRICKHAVEN 2 — Ced I Fulmer. Plan+Manager j

,. sLAa o�
• � T
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury.. Street a Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary August 30, 1985 Director
Mr. Bill Crese
Cherokee Bridik Company of N. C.
P.O. Box 33218
Raleigh, NC 27606
Re: Brickhaven
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Crest:
The application for a mining permit for Brickhaven .in Chatham County has
been found to meet the requirements of G.S. 74-51 of The Mining Act of 1971.
Since your company already has a blanket bond sufficient to cover this
application, I am enclosing the mining permit.
The conditions of the mining permit were based primarily upon
information supplied in the application with conditions added as
necessary to insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971.
Please review the permit and notify this office of any objection or
question concerning the terms of the permit.
cere,
L
ames D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JDS:ps
Enclosure
cc: John Holley
l'O. &)x 27687, Pulcigh, North Canrlina 27611-7687 Tclephunc 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Nor`tli� Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
109 Easdones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
I FG!IQ
James G. Martin; Governor' Pat(ic
June 25, 1985
MPMnDaMntttat
TO: James D. Simons
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources, DNRCD
FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation Office
SUBJECT: Application for Mining Permit
Chatham County, Cherokee Brack Company,
Brickhaven Mine, ER 85-8092
The proposed mining area contains a high probability for the presence of
prehistoric archaeological resources. As we were unable to ascertain
the exact location of the area to be mined during our recent on -site
inspection, we request that you contact the Cherokee Brick Company for
specific directions to their proposed mine. As soon as this information
is available, please contact Dolores Hall at the Archaeology Branch to
arrange for an on -site inspection of the property.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comments, please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
An Equal Opportunity / Aiiirimt ve Action Employer

R'ECEIIVE9�
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and 'Community Development MAY 28 1905
.Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Application for a Mining Permit ;.•
, "'. ... ......a . ...
After July 1, 1972, no operator ...
shall engage in mining without having first
obtained from the Department'in operating permit which covers the affected land
and which has not terminated, been revoked, been suspended fortheperiod in
question. or otherwise become invalid_
1. Name of Mine_ Brickhaven County rhn+hAm
2. Name of Company Cherokee Brick Company of N. C.. Inc.
3.. Rome -Office Address P.O. Box 33218
Raleigh, N. C. 27606
4. Permanent address for receipt ofofficialmail P.O. Box 33218
Raleigh, N. C. 2760.6 Telephone [phone]..
5. Mine Office Address, Rt. 1., Box 263
Moncure, N. C. 27559 'Telephones:919-774-6533
6. Mine Manager Cecil Fulmer
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the beat
of our knowledge..�-Wo-fulty understand
,that any willfuf V1 r pre§ tation of
fatty will be caGaa dr Qe t revocation.
aSiguature
Title Vir Pracidant
Date May 24 1gAF
*Signature of company officer required.

0
2.
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
-A." General Characteristics of;"ine.
1. Total acreage at site for'whtch permit is requested:
Acres .owned 382 Acres leased 0
2. Materials mined:
3. Mining.method: Hydraulic Dredge. Underground
Shovel and Truck Dr`Agline and Truck 0 Self -loading Scraper
Other .
4.' Present depth of mine _ _ 5 W r f & c e _. .
S. Expected maximum ' depth of mine :::'', ' 20 feet
b. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at.present'site that is inactive and.has
not been reclaimed: ! None
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site None
•B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested T_Lri10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage:
a.. Area used for tailing ponds
b. Area used for stockpiles
c. Area used for waste piles
d. Area used for processing plants
e. Area of active mine excavation.
ral
acres
i
acres
.0
acres
0
acres
4
acres
f. Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by
mining 4 acre y/yea r
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 12 'acres
TOTAL PF 2a through 2g z acres

3
4
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total,affected acreage figure
from B, 2 equals acreage to be bonded.
0 - 4.99 acres
a5 - 9.99 acres
R 10 - 24.99 acres
25+ - acres
4. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its
mining operations in North Carolina?
Yes El No
C. Protection of Natural Resources..'.`
I'. What precautions will be taken during mining.operations to
prevent significant -adverse effects on wildlife, or freshwater,
estaurine or marine fisheries? S e d i m e n t 'p a n d with brick
bat dam to f-ilter sediment.
2. Is there a'waste water discharge from your plant.or mine?
Yes No M .
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the.
Division of Environmental Management, Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development.
Exviration Date
3. Is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Yes a No a
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the
Division of Environmental Management, Department.of Natural
Resources and Community Development.
Fxpiratiou Date

4
APPLICATION FOR A MILTING PERMIT
4. Describe methods being taken during mining to.prevent physical
hazard to any neighboring dwelling house',- public road, public,'
commercial'orindustr$al building from any mine excavation.
Mine site is,remote.from any of the above; However, a
vegetative buffer -of trees will be maintained around
-the mine area.
5. '.Describe measures to be taken during mining to insure against
(1) substantial erosion and offsite deposits of sediment (include
specific plans for erosion control for mine excavation, waste.pilee,
and process areas), (2) landslides, (3) acid water pollution.
(1) Sediment ponds will be utilized to control sedimentati.on
on.mine site. The size of these.ponds will be increased
as mining progresses as the mining initially will be
oriented towards formation of these ponds to handle
future expansion. All water ways will- be grasse4. No
offsite sedimentation as a result of -this operation
is anticipated.• See Note next page under #5.
(2) NA
(3) NA

5
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
6. If.explosi.ves will be used. describe what precaution will be used
to prevent physical hazard to persons or,neighboring.property by
flying.rocks or exceesive-air blasts. or ground vibrations,•
Not Applicable
(5) From Previous Page:
All sediment ponds will be constructed in accordance with the-
U.S.D.A. SCS "Guide for Sediment Control on Construction Sites"
Pages 19-29 and under the supervision or direction of Chatham
County SCS personnel. Any diversions.(if needed) to route run
off away from the mine area will be done as above.
Since -the mining operation will create some. holes, these.h.oles
will be used initially as .sediment basins and be reclaimed as
explained later in this application. Most of these sediment
basins will most likely not require dams.
Sediment ponds (See ItemT13, p. 11. of.this application) sized
for the 12 acres unreclaimed or active at a given time would need
to have the capacity of 5 acre feet of storage after year five.
(From Appendix B in above Guide.)

&eclnmation Plan
1. Describe your intended. plan for the reclamation and 'subsequent use of
all affected landetnd indicate the general methods to be used in
reclaiming this 1194:; - -
Sediment ponds will be reclaimed as fish ponds. Mined out areas
will be graded for adequate drainage;.Stockpiled topsoil spread
over the graded..area and the .area seeded with permanent grasses'
nd legumes.
to; Lime will be .applied at a rate of 3 tons per acre and fertilizer,
(5-10-10) at a gate of 800 to 1000-pounds per acre. Sericea -
Lespedeza at 60.-70 dbs/ac., K-31Fescue at 20-30-lbs/ac. and
Millet or Sudan at 15-20 1hs/ac. will be applied to stabilize the
topsoil. After one season of growth of.the above, loblolly pine
/ and improved loblolly pine will be planted to conform with the
company's long range reforestation plans.
Selected plots and areas around the fish ponds will be seeded with
annual and perennialwildlife cover as furnished by the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission.

Reclamation Plan
a
2• In excavation of unconsolidated materials, describe what measures will be
taken to insure protection of adjacent resources such as -width of,buffer
zone and grade of sloe, etc.
A buffer zone i.n areas of cuts will be maintained 25-50 feet in
width. All slopes w,iM no't be in access of 3:1 in steepness.
These slopes will be reclaimed as explained.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
completed excavations in rock.
Not Applicable.
4. Indicate method of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other
. such mine waste areas.
Overburden on this deposit is very thin. Overburden will be
temporarily stockpiled for use in reclamation'as explained.
Stockpiles -will be seeded with perennial and annual wildlife
cover as specified (or supplied) by the N.C. Wildlife Commission.
5. State what precautions will be taken in reclamation to insure that the
reclaimed site is not detrimental to animal or fish life.
The reclaimed are,as will be well drained and sufficient ground
cover established to inhibit excessive sediment runoff. The
ponds will be of sufficient depth to maintain adequate habitat
for fishand aquatic life. Tree farming will eventually produce
woodlands environment for animal life.

a
Reclamation Plan 4
6. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
The,s.ite is naturally screened.
7. 'State the method of reI�Xitation of settling ponds.
Nine out every two'.`tp five years as the ponds are used for
sediment control. After use'as sediment ponds they will be made
into fish ponds,or-backfilled with materials unsuitable for
brick manufacture and seeded in accordance with #1 above.
B. State the method of control, of contaminants and disposal of :pining refuse
(Note definition of refuse in -The Mining.Act of 1971):
Some of the.stumps,.trees and other -organic debris wil'1 be used
as partial sediment control behind the settling ponds. Remaining
stumps, etc., will be buried or burned.
All oil-; grea.s-e and related equipment derived contaminants will
be disposed of 'offsite.
9. Indicate the :gethod of restoration.or establiebment of any drainage channels
to -a condition minimizing erosion,,siltation and other pollution:
All drainage channels created by the mining operation will be
designed for the peak runoff expected from a-24 hour duration,
10 year frequency storm. These channels, if�a�n,•will be
constructed as specified in the SCS standards and specifications
for Grassed Waterways.

9
Reclamation Plan `
10. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water
collecting or remaining in mined areas.
All ponds or Iakes will have sufficient dopth to sustain fish
and other aquatic life. All other areas will be well drained
and graded to prevent any shallow ponding or "mud holes".
11. Describe how the surface grad#int in'unconsolidated materials will be
restored to a condition suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land after reclamation is completed and proposed. -method of accomplishment:
Slope steepness will be limited to not more than a 3:1 slope,. Most
of the material to be mined is consolidated to semiconsolidated
and will maintain this grade. The area(.$) will be covered•with
topsoil and seeded as explained previously.
12. Describe your plan for revegetation or -other surface treatment of the
affected areas: NOTE: Revegetation Plan must be approved by one of the
following:
(a) Authorized representatives'of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District having jurisdiction over lands
in question;
(b) Authorized representatives of the Office of Forest
Resources, Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development;
(c) County Agricultural Extension chairmen or Research
and4xtension personnel headquartered at North.Carolin#
State University'in the School of Agriculture and T.ife
Sciences;
(d) North Carolina -licensed landscape architects;'
(e) Private consulting foresters referred by the Office of
Forest Resources, Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development-
(f) Others as may be approved by the Department.

LO
12. (Continued)
(A) Note: See #1 under this section for revegetation and
surface treatment of affected area(s). See sections
#4,.#5, #7, #9, #10, & #11 for other information
pertinent to .this part of. the reclamation plan.
($-J� After 4-6 years, reclamation will commence on mined areas
and proceed on an annual basis afterwards. This will allow
for weathering of theharder shale and claystone after
exposure making these materials easier to process and reducing
large boulder problems. This will als,0 provide time for
mining out the sites for the settling ponds.to-the sizes
adequate to contain the run off from the affected areas.
As A; as_ a,..� d/a s 0. cj;ee+t.ea "WAI be ee.,siw�ject wjih ;F", A4apS
Boa -le.- 40 secl- <e ,F aas.a_
Revegetation end/or reforestation plan approved by:e�r//
D� 1NS Signature
So��t?on se+✓a F, owr Se+v�ee Title -�
Agency d/ G f f
Date

.Reclamation Plan
13. Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of G.S. 74-53.
(Add sheets if necessary)
A1�
ears 1-4: Mine out and.prepare sediment control ponds; build
rick at" dams; clear and stump areas for immediate mining.
Approximent disturbed area (less haul road.) -at the end of 4 years
would equal 16 acres; 1-2 acres would be -in sediment ponds,
1 acre -in stockpile area, 4 acres reclaimed.and approximately
10 acres would be in active mine excavation.
Years 5-90: Reclamation would proceed at 4 acres per year after
year 5 with an active'mi.ne area of 10 acres fee—r-ec-1. an
14. Notification of Adjoining Landowners
The "NOTICE" form or a facimile thereof attached to this application should
be sent certified or registered mail, to the adjoining landowners unless another
means 'of'notice is approved in advance.
The completed "Affidavit .of Notification" attached to this application must
be submitted before the application is considered complete.

1.2
4
NOTICE
Pursuant to provi$io s G.S. 74-50 of The Mining Act of 1971, notice
is hereby given that Cherokee Brick Co: of N. C. Inc.
ompany ame
has applied on May 24, '1985 to. the Land Quality Section, Division
,a e
of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of'Natural Resources and Community
Development, P. 0. Box 27687, Raleigh, forth Carolina 27611 for a surface
mining permit to commence mining of Shale & C l a s ton e on 382
(Mineral, Ore (Number)
acres located 3 North of
(Miles) Direction Nearest Town
near road 1924 in Chatham County.
Road Naae:•of County
In accordance.with G.S. 74-50, the mine operator is required to make a
reasonable effort to notify all owners of record of land adjoining the proposed
site,=and to notify.the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality
in which the site is located. The property owner may 'file written comment(s)
within ten (10) days following receipt of this..notice to the Department -at the
above.address. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists, a public hearing will be held in accordance to the Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development, Mining, Mineral Resources Regulation Sub-
chapter 5B, :0011.
Ma -24 1985
Date Mailed toAddressee)
Box 33218
(Address of Applicant

13
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
I,O. F. Patterson, II; an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant,
for a Mining Permit from the N,C. Department of Natural Resources and•Community Develop-
ment, being first duly sworn, do hereby attest that the following are known owners, both
private and public, of the land adjoining the proposed mining site ,and that notice of the
pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said
ownera at their, address shown below, such notice being given on a form provided by the
Department:
(Name) (Address)
Federal Paper Board Co Inc P.O. Box 338 Balton N.C. 2A423
Clarenre A- GOndwin 'Rt- 3 Box 79S- Apex N r 97509
Frank n'rkenc Rt 1 Rnx 949 Mnnriirg N C 27559
(See additional name �At %ad aid iPiAai ifi1� if necessary)
I do also attest that the.following is the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which the proposed mining site is located and that notice of
the pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail,
to said office at the following address: '
(Name) (Address)
Marvin Hoffman - P.O. Box 87, Pittsboro N_C.
The above attestation was, made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory
to the Department that a reasonable effort has been made to notify the owners of record of
the adjoining land and the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50 and 15 N.C.A.C. 5 g..0004(d). I understandthat is is the
responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts of mailing showing that the above
notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
CQ-a�a;
Date Signature
If person executing.Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant-, provide
the following information: (Name of applicant) rhornkap Rrirk rrmpany
title of person executing Affidavitl: r,Polog ist R Agpnt
I, WO 6 x , a Notary 'Public of tha`eounty of e'a
State of North Carolin do hereby certify that Q. �F. \ iers n�.
personally appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above
Affidavit was made by him. _
�L
Witness my hand and notarial seal, [tiia Z Q day of
19 �.
es . ..--'
Notary
My Commission expires: __ "

I e-p,

Additional List
(Name)
(Address)
Virginia M. Cotten
Rt.
1, Box 393, Moncure, N.C.
27559
Thelma E. Mansfield
Rt.1,
Box 495, Moncure, N.C.
27559
Elizabeth S. Buchanan
Rt.
1, Moncure, N. C. 27559
David M. Buchanan
1434
Kirkwood Drive, Durham,
N.C.
Boise Cascade Corporation
P.O.
Box 230, Moncure, N.C. 27559
Champion International Corporation
P.O.
Box 580, Roanoke Rapids,
N.C.

CM4IXAN
zI'
e�
•oe„
R A N D O l P H
If
•y � R 4 '
QW
a
x�
Frj
LnW
xj
D
e��9 j,. i �
� � � � 8 E
�
•
y'�
' ,.
�
� •C�
� - � - � L'Sa �S �i.
\� III E_...
x
—I \
ir
I
41
x
V •4
�L �
f v S �
\� T'e• L c 1 �� � � � � x io
-,
,� •9
12
\ s ,.� a `F• 4 \. p✓
4
444
3 KK
7911
L
TAB
\
u4
L'�, HO � � L
S L• _ � �a 1i
��J�
�I: ,��•
� I C
�L _ S
�
a I
�a
1i
gg
s
Y
1'
It k r
o w� • It �F'
�'��
pRS
nw.
3 - £ �° v e �"
v
OIL
15
It
Y14 r lye -
''�jf
70155
B
�
g
hg
T
z
i
wM Z(DOF]
O
a
me ZO
E
pap OZ
> = 3 Z
—i
g a
o�z"s��:
_
� s
�> 'S'x•
n=
n;_' 2m
D
O
n
o=gym
A
r
�t
❑> D
�z=
y
II a • o� or
i��!��'Hl����a�i •���$�
3o
`
.®..�'.'..
♦ 1����i
z
7
d "� h ¢� 92:°€S€� "$'p gigs€�y°g eg@�6
Mill
�5�
g'��M�
g€�5� €
MINI
JL�9€g�3�
a
V

I
ti✓ua
©� n
a�o�o
'
Q\
G
C�
rill
C,
A

Z-3 z
CRIEP ._ a:erx mmwe cuc F : � a f� LOCATION 5KE7CH
Feu+ To Y v
t
s s
15 N 8a p6 59 N 1215. E8 -- 20 ----' #
`#
a C _ .J s e1 56 e2 a 1848.67 u v � �` CC ITE
ob ;e 6 86.5.54 Zt ' X'tx,y
K 5 81 ,2 Q N 3167.64 23 •� " �
L N N9 55 55 N iM 65 24
2t N ee 43 op a 369 4t
x N 8s ! AS 5 N Sc. 55 'E
:`'
2t N 4e 5 N 828. 44 e . " —..
a&" 6 \ E° 0lb�1 „ F E D E R A L T R A C T NO, 6- 2 2 0 3 5
28 N as :2 A . ssd.6! s � - � /
Es 85 2s Q k 38.82 - 0( ''
N 89 45 :P N ?8@.13 7: \\ f O
3: N 84 a3 58 N 230� !� Q 1
a N 8e w3 50 N W. % 3 1 �,„„ r° !y f/ J (� �lI7
65
k ee " bN E 7N.Tq .e re=,.-'" ..,! d �Q l �V ! ^\ ,.�Z'�Jt� 250 P3 F/ CV �q
at N ^ 52 85 .7E E3 1 r �+63 (?
6s e� PE 5H - '.8t 66.. �o / BB
`ddd
1 \\ \ I
/ o
2so �`� \6� i I �Y' CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL
� 2
N
\ CORP. i cp
o \ I I
a
E60
\ 22 cc
_ s2OO / // J z q
Lu
I'll/ I ` 26v , doe,
- _ % ,�'a / 601SE CASCADE
dood" dodo,
3<dooj
a�
rt
/ i 4` 4~:
-�2� 2 7 / I 26 -P.._ ' �~-_,,,� / 3 8 2, 0 0 ACRE SURVEY F O R
dodo,l 1 �y ., S� Q 4 CHEROKEE BRICK COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
33 32 3t 30 24 28 ��
"j' f / 1 ry ,, /�S�Q µ 9 wbS° FEDERAL TRACT NO. 6-22035
`t pt ( J CAPE FEAR TOWNSHIP, CHATHAM COVNTY,NORTH CARilLi?
II I A „ �'�' -r•,�Id �� ! I f'a� t JANUARY 24 1485 SCALE t" =400
t- E 9 lsr- Q • I iCNeR NMTtod/ -
/>� ro C. H. BLUE AND ASSOCIATES, P. A.
N_ r.,.
F`
, Q\ SOUTHERN PINE5t N.C.
i o aoo ac,
:zna
NOTE: CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROM MONCURE QUADRANGLE, '� �t ��\" ' , \ �cat� loot
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. ( �`" l or, Y d ;
p2o➢osED raitac- lNay�T Pay--Er�so r.� c-+�v�.o2nr�ott sys. I ^ '-T t'�`F 7ry� , 11 Ll q`'�
n av r ors 528s
.__ no--
L( PIE
F a 02 14 84

CORNEA mim
FRR
GEARING
DISTAN_'r
IX1RER MJKR
TO
19
N.89 75 50 N
121568
26
26
Sll 56 MN
"IMP'
21
21
N 02 86 14 W
On 59
22
22
S IN 12 40 W
- 3167.64
23
23
N 89.59 A W
139L 65
24
24
N 80 43 11 N
1369; 46�
25
23
N 89 19 05 W
98.85
-26
26
N 89 11 15 W
M44
'P"
27
S 12 43 25 N
dR.M
28
28,
N 89 12 1A N
B99.61
29
29
N 89 29 48 M
308.82
30
36
N 89 45 28 N
46L23
31
31
N 89 33 58 M
M48
32
32
N 09 33 56 Y
662.96
33
33
N N 44 30 E
724.74
. 34
34
N 51 52 08.E
5023..78
63
63
S 89 06 58 E
T757, Z6
66
66
S 84 53 !0 W
66,!6
65
65
N 89 06 50 W
476.9E
;9
Me. 81 ACRES
PBECIBION'E/Cm'1/10;60.0+
ACREAGE BY DMD 'METMFO-D O.E R A �-
tl
NOTE :CORNERS MARKED BY
LION STAKE, ON /
LINE A7 65 AND
ND 66860
30'FR0e1 CENTER OF RR.
fl:4V O \' QO �7
i0
33
32 31 30 YS
ax Mam, Leo Buchanan
NORTH CAROLINA
IBC. N. j1 REGISTERED LAID SURVEYOR
CERTIFY THAT THIS MY WC8 DRAWN UmER
NY M%WISUIN FRDN IN WW GUKY
AAOE KER MY ' SAERVISIBNI THAT THIS
RAT 19 PIEPM IN'ACLDRBDEE WITH 6.
S. 47-38.AS AlCW,:WITNESS NY ORIGINAL
SI9MTIRE, RESISTTATIDN OUR H41 SEAL �,..,.••.,
THIS 7TR DAY OF "CAR
19AA.UPp�WSTpgF
q ; SITE
:i
RIB
N1M0ER NO 6�Z2035
EM
R.A C T
63 3 ea'08050'E 3757.8b
nP�
m
INTERNATIONAL I
m CORP.
m Im
m I
0
_ _...4—` _e e. n
/ O
m
m
c " 801SE CASCADE "
Y
N
m
N 59'ea'-550w
REFERENCE: PLAT BOOK a, PAGE D ,
DEED B0OK 366, PAGE 79£,
CHATNAN COUNTY REB/STIN.
Owner 'address:Cherokee Brick
At. l Box 276
Moncure, N,'S, 27559
Q
h
N
O.
/ v F�
RESm a 2C 382.00 ACRE SURVEY FOR
sl sE
VARY RELIC IF THE MUM AND57RTE • """"""' CHEROKEE BRICK COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
FFORESIn DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
C. H. BLLE- , FEDERAL TRACT NO. 6-22035
A RESISTER®DE ME THIS
PERSONALLY CAPE FEAR TOWNSHIP$ CHATHAM COUNTY$NORTHCAROLII
nPPEAIED aFaE IE Txls DAY arm
ALT(NILED® THE - EXECUTION OF TIE JANCA4RY 29 $ 198E SCALE to N400$
FOXING 116TIAlRNT. WITNESS NY 11ND
AND. OFFICIAL STAIN) OR SEAL, THIS
Tv( DAY IF Fc aczrralr-t C. H. BLUE AND ASSOCIATES, P. A.
SOUTHERN PINES, N.C.
400 0 - 400 80,
NY COMISSIDI EXPIRES: 1-28-86 ,� .. .' '1•_gpp•
scale Isat
N"O T A-R-Y I P U B LI O.,
i F R 02 14 ll

LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right of entry and travel upon our lands.or operation during regular
business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of
this Act, so long as t�e Department or its appointed representatives are
accompanied by -an agent or representative of our Company.
We further grant to,the Department or its appointed representatives
the right to make whatever entries on the.land as may be reasonably
necessary and to take whateve��actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete
in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to Section 14.
*Signed
Title Vice Presiden
Mine .Brickhaven '
Company Cherokee Brick Company_
*Signature should be the came as the officer who signed the application
for a permit.
Return to:
Land Quality Section
Appropriate Regional Office
(see attached list of Regional Offices)

JJ r r ,�•,.Q
A �/{ ire j'f3 r .s g C7 C7 2K

� YNA1IYN �.i
- + - - PATTERSON P. O: BOX 1473 - SANFOR 6 . C7m27 30 ' I919M 776-8 11
EXPLORATION SERVICES
AUG
LAND QUALITY SECTION
August 15, 1985 t
Mr. James D. Simons
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Dear Jim,
Please find attached,drawings you requested for the
Cherokee Brick Brickhaven Mine permit submitted on May 24,
1985.
For size of sediment basins in disturbed areas, refer to
notes on drawing and application.
We would like to start the new mine before the weather
gets bad. Your help in expediting the permit would be
greatly appreciated.
If there are any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
0. F. Patterson, III
PATTERSON EXPLORATION
SERVICES
OFP/scp

RECP E
JULr >
ILA ND OJAL; Y '": 71rt�i
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Patric Dorsey, Secretary William S. Price, Jr., Director
July 18, 1985
MrMnVAMnTTM
TO: James D. Simons
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources, DNRCD
FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Application for Mining Permit
Chatham County,Brickhaven Pit
Cherokee Brick Company, ER 85-8092
As you are aware, an on -site inspection was recently conducted at
the above mentioned project location.
Although prehistoric archaeological materials were located within the
proposed mining area, this area has been previously disturbed by
timbering and clearing activity and the context of the archaeological
remains has been destroyed. We therefore have no objection to the
issuance of a mining permit for the Brickhaven Pit.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. if you have questions
concerning the above comments, please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
109 EastJones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]