Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW_ _Exteraaanal_ _Mining Permit 92-10_ The public deserves our public lands to be protected - deny rock mineJohnson, Robert E From: Sams, Dan Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 8:38 AM To: NCMiningProgram Subject: FW: [External] [Mining Permit 92-10] The public deserves our public lands to be protected - deny rock mine From: Bud Frank [mailto:info@sg.actionnetwork.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 11:35 PM To: Sams, Dan <dan.sams@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [External] [Mining Permit 92-10] The public deserves our public lands to be protected - deny rock mine l aim wildfing to state my stroing objection to mi Ipeirmit application 92 10, because it's clear that continued mlinliing/guairirylling directly adjacent to Uimstead State Park and ineighboiding town pairks & gireeinways willl Ihave a sigilt adverse effect on air & water qualIllty for residents & wildlife that depend upon these vitall ii recreation areas. Approvall of t1his Ipeirmit would mufti the myriad Iplhysi Ihazairds to Ipulblic IheaIltlh and safety that aIliready exist because of the current quarry. Why was the suinset clause on the Ipeirmit for the current quarry inext to Uimstead iremoved22 Citizens Ihave a ir9iglht to know. NEW quairrylling inext to Urnstead State Park is the most destructive use of the Ilaind it would substail degrade the current ecosystem's ii water fiftration, wNich Ihellps to protect the downstream watershed of Crabtree Creek. It would ailte an limpoirtaint clean air & noise Ibuffeir for Ipairk users. Rease deny t1his Ipeirmit. l Ihope that RDUAA can evaluate afteirinative uses for t1his Ilaind and willl consider accepting a Ipuirchase offer from the Park and Iprovlide ineeded funds for allirport Ipuirposes. That way citizens and visitors who travel) to the Tiriainglle iregion Iby way of the allrport MH continue to have a thiriving, Ihealltlhy destination to einjoy when they arrive. Bud Firainlk budfnc(a-)_qmail.com 3312 Thomas Rd. Ralleiglh, North Cairofina 27607