Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpooner - NPDES Individual required - Permit Application, 92-10-Umstead Coalition Comments (partial 8 of)t` The Umstead Coalition Th P.O. Box 10654 Umstead Raleigh, NC 27605-0654 Coalition (919) 852-2268 http://umsteadcoalition.org facebook.com/umsteadcoalition meetup.com/umsteadcoalition B. W. Wells Association New Hope Audubon Society NC Native Plant Society Capital Group Sierra Club Neuse Riverkeeper Foundation Orange -Chatham Group Sierra Club Eno River Association NC Herpetological Society Raleigh Ski and Outing Club, Inc. Friends of State Parks NC League Conservation Voters Foundation Rockingham Naturalist's Club Headwaters Group Sierra Club NC Wildlife Federation Friends of Jockey's Ridge Wake Audubon Society July 17, 2020 Mr. Brian Wrenn, Director Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1612 Daniel Sams, Regional Engineer Hearing Officer Wilmington Regional Office, DEQ 127 Cargo Dr Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 Subject: NPDES permits for Wake Stone quarries adjacent to Umstead State Park Dear Mr. Wrenn and Mr. Sams: A new Individual NPDES Permit should be issued for the existing Triangle Quarry operation. The proposed new pit expansion must be denied per the numerous reasons for denial under G.S. 74-51. The application is incomplete on numerous aspects. One aspect is the need for an application for a new Individual NPDES Permit. The current Mining Permit Application should not be considered without an Individual NPDES application. Currently, the Triangle Quarry operated by Wake Stone Corporation off N. Harrison Avenue operates under General Permit No. NCG02000 to discharge stormwater, mine dewatering, and process wastewater under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The General Permit has proved insufficient to prevent "adverse effects" to Crabtree Creek and William B. Umstead State Park, a requirement of G.S. 74-51 (d) (2) and G.S. 74-51 (d) (5). I. An Individual Permit should be issued for the existing operation. Reasons include: • The General Permit clearly states under Section B: Permitted Activities that the "discharges allowed by this General Permit shall not cause or contribute to violations of Water Quality Standards." r The Umstead Coalition v Dedicated to preserving the natural integrity of W.B. Umstead State Park and the Richland Creek Corridor • The General Permit further states that "[i]f the Division determines that discharges have reasonable potential to cause water quality standard violations, the facility shall apply for an individual permit 180 days prior to the expiration date of this General Permit." • The current Water Quality Standard for Class C waters for turbidity is 50 NTU. 15A NCAC 02B .0211(21). • The limited monitoring data from the existing outfalls recorded on the annual reports (accessed within DEQ's Laser Fiche) shows some values that are well in excess of the Water Quality Standards (e.g.., 12/17/15 with TSS of 470 vs 100; turbidity of 888 NTU). See also the example photographic evidence below. • The current NPDES Stormwater permit issued under the "General" permit category for mines is inappropriate for a mining operation next to a State Park and Crabtree Creek. The current stormwater permit only lists "benchmark" pollutant limits and has little enforcement teeth. • The current Permit allows exceedance of water quality standards normally considered "violations" but called "benchmark values" in the General Permit. • The current operation has numerous occasions with apparent exceedances of the "benchmark turbidity values" which have gone unchecked. These clearly have an "adverse effect" on Crabtree Creek and William B. Umstead State Park. Photo documentation (taken from within William B. Umstead State Park) from direct discharges into Crabtree Creek from 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 are all similar to: Park staff and visitors have reported that this has gone on "for years." More than one speaker and written comments submitted for the June 23 and July 7 Public Hearings relayed their personal observations of similar. At least one comment noted that this white plume remains in Crabtree Creek for over 1 mile within the Park well past the historic Company Mill Dam site. V The Umstead Coalition v Dedicated to preserving the natural integrity of W.B. Umstead State Park and the Richland Creek Corridor 2 • The rocks within the stream discharging into Crabtree Creek (an unnamed tributary that meanders through our Park) are caked with a "white(ish)" material, unlike any streams originating within the Park. • The limited monitoring data from the existing outfalls recorded in the annual reports (accessed within DEQ's Laser Fiche) shows some values that are well over the benchmarks (i.e., 12/17/15 with TSS of 470 vs 100; turbidity of 888 vs 50 NTU). The permit requires a response by Wake Stone Corporation to benchmark exceedances. No response documents were found in this review of the Laser fiche. • The current operation routinely discharges fine -sediment laden waters directly into William B. Umstead State Park near the Park entrance (photos below were taken May 22, 2020). These discharges are a result of their unsuccessful attempt to dampen the huge dust plumes at their entrance by using wastewater from their pit to irrigate the dust in the road. This water has created ponded waters within the park in violation of the "undisturbed buffer" commitment and has killed large trees within Umstead State Park. Despite repeated complaints from the Park staff and public since 1982, this continues. • Pit water is defined in the NPDES Permit as wastewater. Discharging untreated wastewater directly in William B. Umstead State Park is a direct violation of their General Permit. This violation has been left unchecked and allowed to worsen since first reported in 1982, and multiple times since. Using Umstead State Park to divert and treat polluted wastewater from a private rock mining operation is a direct adverse impact on our Park. This is also a severe violation of the committed "undisturbed buffers." r The Umstead Coalition v Dedicated to preserving the natural integrity of W.B. Umstead State Park and the Richland Creek Corridor II. The Application for a new mining operation on the Odd Fellows tract on the other side of Crabtree Creek is incomplete without an application for an Individual NPDES Permit. Reasons for the incomplete Application include: • Wake Stone argues that a new NPDES permit is not required because they will pump water out of the new pit to the old pit: Pdf page 14 of Application under: Sequence of Land Disturbing Activities: "18. Early stages of pit development may include sinking a ramp down along the inside of the new RDUpit perimeter road. As this excavation advances to the south, all accumulated stormwater and groundwater will be pumped to the existing Triangle Quarry pit, and managed under current NCG02 guidelines. "19. As the new pit development progresses to the south, eventually Temporary Sediment Basin 4 will also be removed and incorporated into overburden cut slope for the new mine pit as shown on WSC Site Plan (Sheet S). At that point, all disturbed areas will drain to the new pit, and all accumulated stormwater and groundwater will be stored as needed or pumped to the preexisting pit for treatment and use, or discharged at the existing approved discharge location under NCG02. " Question: Where is this pump and pipe? They are not shown on any site plan maps. What are the details for this pipe? • The Permit Application also proposed to dump overburden into the existing pit: "PS of pdf in Application: If the off -site demand for overburden falls short of the pace of stripping, the old Triangle Quarry pit will be used for storage of overburden. " This soil will contaminate the existing pit ground and rainwater. This will complicate the pumping and stormwater/sump discharge from the existing pit. • The Hydrogeological Study submitted with the Mining Permit Application indicates a likely net reduction of flow from Crabtree Creek due to the deep pit in close proximity. Section D 1. of the current NPDES Stormwater permit requires Permittees that have the potential to drain Wetlands or other surface waters to develop Pumping and Monitoring (POM) Plans. We cannot find the required Pumping and Monitoring (POM) Plan for the existing quarry. Does it exist? The proposed new quarry will certainly have the potential to drain significant amounts of wetlands and tributaries. The required Pumping and Monitoring (POM) Plan is not included in the Permit Application. The required POM should be submitted, evaluated and approved as part of the permit application process. In summary, an application for a new Individual NPDES Stormwater Permit is required for the current operation and an application for a separate NPDES Stormwater Permit should be required in the Mining Application and tailored to protect Umstead State Park and Crabtree Creek. Reasons include: The submitted application simply refers to the average existing Triangle quarry impacts. It does not address estimated new quarry impacts. Nor does it address cumulative impacts of both pits. The new pit operation may double the stormwater discharge. • Violating NC water quality discharge standards • New and vastly expanded areas of deforestation, exposed soil, and impervious areas V The Umstead Coalition v Dedicated to preserving the natural integrity of W.B. Umstead State Park and the Richland Creek Corridor 4 • Various new discharge locations to Crabtree Creek as indicated on the proposed site plan • Contaminated wastewater from the existing site by overburden dumped from the proposed new pit requiring treatment • Increased stormwater discharge due to loss of soil infiltration and water channelization • Massive amount of soil disturbance and excavation and movement of exposed overburden -- likely equivalent to 500 trucks per day for 2 to 3 years • Direct soil loss into Crabtree Creek from the trucks moving soil and rock high above Crabtree Creek via the bridge and (or the planned conveyor belt system as relayed to previously to the public), but for which no details are provided in application. • Massive amount of soil disturbance For all the reasons stated above, we respectfully request that Wake Stone Corporation be required to apply for and obtain Individual NPDES Permits for their existing Triangle Quarry operation. The Mining Permit Application is incomplete. Wake Stone Corporation should be required to apply for, and justify an Individual NPDES Permits as part of their Application for a new operation on the other side of Crabtree Creek. Sincerely, Jean Spooner, PhD Chair, The Umstead Coalition Cc: Annette Lucas, Stormwater Program Supervisor, NCDEQ Sheila Holman, Assistant Secretary for the Environment, NCDEQ John Fullwood, Director, NC Division of Parks and Recreation, Dept Natural and Cultural Resources Brian Strong, Deputy Director, Planning and Natural Resources, NC Division of Parks and Recreation, Dept Natural and Cultural Resources Reid Wilson, Chief Deputy Secretary, Dept Natural and Cultural Resources r The Umstead Coalition v Dedicated to preserving the natural integrity of W.B. Umstead State Park and the Richland Creek Corridor 5