Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210825_J-Wheelock_County-zoningFrom: Wheelock, Jennv To: Parr, Adam; Smith, Mike M Cc: Jack Cline; sstevensCa caldwellcountync,org Subject: [External] Hoods Creek Mine application -- City of Lenoir comments Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 10:51:52 AM Attachments: HoodsCreekSoils ETJ zonina.odf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Mr. Parr, Hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to you about the above referenced application, because the subject property is partially located within the City of Lenoir's extra -territorial jurisdiction (ETJ). I'm attaching a map that shows the specific area, but it basically includes the entire frontage of the property adjacent to Hoods Creek and Bryant Rd (-39 acres). The land is zoned Rural - Residential, which wouldn't allow for mining, and it's unlikely we'd up -zone property in this area, given the range of intense uses that could be established in the future, in an area with no planned expansion of City services. Mr. Hoffman is aware of these constraints, but his application shows activity occurring within this area. I will contact him directly, but since this is still under review, I wanted to also make you aware that additional plan changes might be coming. I'm concerned about the amount of dirt -moving that's already occurred on the site. I reported it this summer to the County and the NCDOT, and had every intention of reporting it to you, too, but Sharon Bryant beat me to it (not sure if she's told you this, but she is the ETJ representative on the City's Planning Board, so she is someone with whom I've had a positive working relationship with for years). Thank you for stopping the work — if I had jurisdiction over the entire property, I would have done a stop work myself as a general work without permits violation, but given all the other entities with jurisdiction, I didn't think it would be very effective. Some key issues/concerns from my perspective: -The applicant initially requested a re -zoning and special use permit for a mine from Caldwell County, and during the Planning Board meeting, several questions came up related to where the access to site would be and one member of the Planning Board asked him if he'd considered just doing a borrow pit instead of the full mining permit. The board tabled the application to allow the applicant to approach DEQ and NCDOT about what would be allowed/required and to come back to the board with more information. At least that's how I understood it, from being there. -In the application materials, the applicant implies that he has approval for industrial uses from the County, and in emails implies the Planning Board told him to apply for a borrow pit, and I don't think this is an accurate representation. Work started on this site despite the applicant being well aware that he had no approvals from DEQ the City of Lenoir, or Caldwell County — and he opened two driveway connections when he only had permits/approval for one. -Most of the concerns about access, from the community, from me, and from NCDOT, related to placing a driveway connection on Bryant Rd. The applicant did not request any approval for a Bryant Rd connection, and when the application for the driveway off Hood's Creek came through, there was no mention of the additional connection. However, almost immediately after receiving approval from the NCDOT for the Hood's Creek Rd driveway connection, the connection to Bryant Rd was re- opened. The applicant told NCDOT it was just to get equipment on site, and to do some soil tests, implying that the use of the connection was very temporary. But from my field observations, the activity occurring and the use of this driveway far exceeded what he represented — especially since this connection is shown on the plans submitted with the mining permit and the site work seems to follow the plans pretty closely (and encroaches into the R-R zoned portion of the site, which I've documented in written comments to the applicant wouldn't be allowed). -During the NCDOT's review of the driveway permit application for the connection to Hood's Creek Rd, Carson Fisher reached out to me to see if I had any concerns, as is standard practice for any driveway connection he reviews within my jurisdiction. Given the proximity to Greasy Creek, I made him aware of the 50 ft. stream buffer rules, although at that time I expected DEQ to have had an opportunity to review and comment on the plans prior to any work starting. Earlier this week, Mr. Fisher informed me that the connection to Hood's Creek was not installed in the location shown on the approved plans — contractors made the decision in the field to shift the driveway closer to Greasy Creek. Since I doubt this change is reflected on the plans you're reviewing, and the shift likely impacts the stream buffer, I wanted you to be aware of this field change (copying Mike Smith, too, and Jack Cline, who is the City's stormwater administrator and normally coordinates questions on stream buffers and stormwater permits on behalf of the City). Maybe none of this is relevant to DEQ's review, and I'm not trying to "kill" his application, but I think this will require some diligence from all of us since there's a demonstrated pattern of asking "forgiveness rather than permission." I'm happy to discuss anything with your further if you feel it would be helpful. I also have some questions that I'm hopeful you can answer. Email response is great, or you can reach me at 828-850-0620 (cell) or 828-757-2168 (office). My questions for you: 1. Is the applicant currently under a formal stop work order from DEQ? I saw the emails between you and the applicant, but wondered if a formal notice was sent or if it was just a verbal order? If there is a stop work order in place, what would be the resolution? An approved mining or S&EC permit? 2. Has a determination been made about whether or not this site would be eligible for approval as a single -use borrow pit for under 5 acres? 3. When I searched the statutes for laws related to "borrow pits," the only definition I found defined a borrow pit as something exclusive to NCDOT (believe this is in the Mining Act statutes). From the emails I read, it seems clear that DEQ does review and approve borrow sites that aren't for the DOT, so I was just curious about the interpretation. 4. If this project moves forward under a S&EC permit for a borrow pit, and the applicant withdraws the mining permit application, would he be able to ask for additional permits for similar activities on this same site in the future? Either as additional clay borrow permits, or as a full-blown mining permit? 5. Related to the above question, does the 2018 S&EC permit have any impact on the current request? Any statute of limitations on renewing/reactivating that permit? I thought I'd read that borrow pit activity had to occur within a single 12-month period. But some of the email exchanges I reviewed seemed to contemplate a renewal of this previous request rather than a new application. Would a change of ownership allow a new borrow permit, even though this site already has been used once in that capacity? Thanks so much for your time, and for any additional information/clarity that you might provide to help me understand these laws a little better. Martin Marietta pre -dates my time in Lenoir, and so this is my first exposure to the Mining Act and some of these terms/approvals (like "borrow pit" was a new one for me). Please let me know if there's anything I can assist you with. Sincerely, Jenny Jenny L. Wheelock, AICP, CZO Planning Director City of Lenoir www.cityoflenoir.com/planning 828-610-8442 — Planner on Call 828-757-2168 — office •CITY AFLENAIA Hoods Creek Soils ZoningMap.*. t". NORTH CAAOLINA Created by the Lenoir Planning Department on 6/5/2020 i1 A� a� fq� b' i\ Q A y,A .�25, Rural RI Caldi Industrii Legend Subject Property Caldwell Proposed Industrial Rezoning: -45 AC ETJ Acreage on Proposed Active Quarry Area: -15 AC Total Acreage of Subject Property in Lenoir ETJ: -39 AC Streams 04 — Lenoir Extra Territorial Jurisdiction Lenoir Rural Residential Zoning 50' Stream Buffer N A 1 inch = 302 feet 0 75 150 300 Feet A i