20220216_No_rise

PSD PROPERTIES
1003 Red Banks Road
Greenville, NC 27835
252-917-3400
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
RECEIVED
RE: Nichols Sand Pit FEB 16 2022
Mining Permit #74-99 LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
Pitt County Tar River Basin
Enclosed is the worksheet for the notarized certification.
Please review.
Thank You
Mark Smith

North Carolina Department of Public Safety
EmergencyManagement
�./ Roy Cooper, Governor W illiam C. Ray, Director
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr. Secretary
December 22, 2021
Thomas Shrader
Planner III-Floodplain, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Pitt County
1717 W. 5th Street
Greenville, NC 27834
Subject: No -Rise Certification Study for Proposed Nichols Sand Pit Expansion Project, Pitt
County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Shrader,
The North Carolina Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Risk
Management National Flood Insurance Program (NCNFIP) staff has reviewed the Engineering
No -Rise Study Report and Certification for the proposed Nichols Sand Pit Expansion Project
located along Tar River in Pitt County, North Carolina. The report was prepared by Matthew
Prokop, P.E., Rivers & Associates, Inc., dated on November 19, 2021 and then revised on
�✓ December 22, 2021. The revised report was received in this office on December 22, 2021.
Based on the information provided, the NCNFIP review indicates the report meets the
requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) guidance for a no -rise
certification. The NCNFIP finds no objection to the conclusion of no increase in base flood
elevation or floodway elevation as contained in the certification.
A Floodplain Development Permit will be required prior to construction.
If you have any questions or concerns with the items herein, please contact me at (919) 825-
2317, by email at iintao.wenna,ncdys.f ov or at the address shown on the footer of this document.
Sincerely, RECEIVED
�4Jy FEB 1 g 2022
?:tao Wen, Ph.D., P.E.
NC NFIP Engineer LAND QUALITY
NC Emergency Management MINING PROGRAM
MAII.ING ADDRESS: O FFIC E LO CATIO N:
N%Wle 4218 Mail Service Center 4105 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-4218 Raleigh, NC 27607
Floodnc.gov Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Employer

j G e
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to
practice in the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the
attached technical data supports the fact that the proposed Nichols Sand Pit
will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or impact
the floodway widths, on Tar River at published cross- sections in the
Flood Insurance Study for Pitt County. NC (FIRM Panel 3720562700L), dated
June 9. 2020 and will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway
elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished cross- sections
in the area of the proposed development.
`%ZH CARS'
oF�ssrp� 1 •:
SEA:_
033SE1
E wr
Seal and Signature
Matthew J Prokop
Name
Proiect Engineer
Title
Rivers & Associates
107 E 2nd St, Greenville, NC 27858
Address
December 22, 2021
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

Nichols Sand Pit
No -Rise Certification
Parcel ID 85515 & 85653
Alvin Rd
Pitt County, NC
ivers
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Since 1918
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
F-0334
107 E. 2nd Street
Greenville, NC 27858
252-752-4135
�µuueu��r
%A CARO",,,
S q
SEAL
033861
y
Matthew �''Prnk6p, PE
Date: 11/19/2021
Revised: 12/22/21

Project Overview
PSD Properties, LLC is desiring to expand on an existing sand mining operation in eastern Pitt County,
within the floodplain of the Tar River. An existing sand pit is located on parcel no. 85515. PSD properties
is currently in the process of purchasing the neighboring parcel (ID 85653 and intends on extending the
existing mining operation onto the adjacent parcel.
Site Description
Both parcels are located within the 1-percent annual chance flood boundary from the Tar River, as
identified in the Pitt County Flood Insurance Study (FIS), Map Number 3720562700L, dated June 19,
2020. The existing sand pit is located with Zone AE, with a Base Flood Elevation (BFE) ranging from
14.1 —14.4 ft (NAVD). The proposed expansion will be located within Zone AE/F000dway.
The existing sand mine is permitted to include up to 25 acres. The existing site includes excavation up to
20-feet in depth, with minimum side slopes of 2:1 below water level, and 3:1 side slope above water level.
The excavated area is encircled with a screening berm. The layout of the existing sand mine is included
in the attached Topographic Work Map.
Proposed Mine
The proposed mine expansion will encompass approximately 15.67 acres to the north of the existing
excavated area. The proposed mine will be excavated in similar fashion to the existing area, as shown
on the attached Topographic Work Map.
Duplicate Effective Model
\qw✓ The existing model input data for the Tar River was obtained via the North Carolina Flood Risk
Information System (FRIS). The effective model was run in HEC-RAS version 3.0.1. For this study,
HEC-RAS version 6.0.0 was chosen. The updated version of HEC-RAS was able to duplicate the 1-
percent water surface elevation (WSEL) for all modeled sections.
Corrected Effective Model
Topographic data provided by Malpass & Associates was used to establish a pre -construction profile of
the project area. The effective HEC-RAS model includes a cross-section, stationed 50,247, which directly
intersects the project area. Cross-section stations and elevations were updated according to the provided
topographic data. Roughness coefficients were updated based upon aerial photography. No edits were
made to any other input to the model.
Existing Conditions
Upon obtaining the digital HEC-RAS model, it was observed that the date of the hydraulic analysis
preceded the existing excavation. To incorporate the changes to topography that occurred between the
effective analysis and present day, an Existing Conditions analysis was performed. The same
topographic data from the attached work map was used to update the model geometry, with the average
excavation width used across the existing area. An assumed standing water elevation of 5-ft NAVD was
used.
Proposed Berm
The existing screening berm will be extended approximately 800 feet into the regulatory floodway. Cross-
section geometry was updated to simulate the proposed 6-ft high berm, with excavation inside of the sand
pit. The model geometry was updated again to reflect the average width across the extended mining
area. An assumed standing water elevation of 5-ft was again used.

\.4m/
Optional Grading
Following the completion of sand excavation, the site my or may not be converted back to a more natural
state. To account for any future grading on the site, the cross-section geometry was again modified to
simulate the removal of the screening berm.
Comparison
The computed 1-percent annual chance and 1-percent annual chance floodway water surface elevations
for each simulation are shown in the comparison table below. The Existing and Proposed water surface
elevations are shown in comparison to the Corrected Effective simulation.
River Sta
Plan
Water Surface Elev
ft
Change Relative to
1 pct
1 pct FW
Corrected Effective
ft
73797.7
Effective
17.70
18.24
--
--
73797.7
Corrected Effectve
17.70
18.25
--
--
73797.7
Existing Conditions
17.65
18.25
-0.05
0.00
73797.7
Proposed Berm
17.60
18.19
-0.10
-0.06
73797.7
Optional Grading
17.61
18.18
-0.04
-0.07
68086
Effective
16.98
17.54
--
--
68086
Corrected Effectve
16.98
17.56
--
--
68086
Existing Conditions
16.92
17.56
-0.06
0.02
68086
Proposed Berm
16.86
17.48
-0.12
-0.08
68086
Optional Grading
16.88
17.47
-0.04
-0.09
64571.6
Effective
16.55
17.12
--
--
64571.6
Corrected Effectve
16.56
17.14
--
--
64571.6
Existing Conditions
16.49
17.14
-0.06
0.02
64571.6
Proposed Berm
16.43
17.06
-0.13
-0.08
64571.6
Optional Grading
16.45
17.05
-0.04
-0.09
61617
Effective
16.10
16.68
--
--
61617
Corrected Effectve
16.11
16.71
--
--
61617
Existing Conditions
16.04
16.71
-0.06
0.03
61617
Proposed Berm
15.96
16.62
-0.15
-0.09
61617
Optional Grading
15.99
16.61
-0.05
-0.10
57866
Effective
15.50
16.10
--
--
57866
Corrected Effectve
15.50
16.13
--
--
57866
Existing Conditions
15.42
16.13
-0.08
0.03
57866
Proposed Berm
15.36
16.02
-0.14
-0.11

�1
River Sta
Plan
Water Surface Elev
ft
Change Relative to
1 pct
1 pct FW
Corrected Effective
ft
53127
Effective
14.76
15.39
--
--
53127
Corrected Effectve
14.76
15.42
--
--
53127
Existing Conditions
14.66
15.42
-0.10
0.03
53127
Proposed
Conditions
14.55
15.30
-0.21
-0.12
53127
Optional Grading
14.55
15.30
-0.11
-0.12
50247
Effective
14.37
15.00
--
--
50247
Corrected Effectve
14.37
15.01
--
--
50247
Existing Conditions
14.33
15.01
-0.04
0.01
50247
Proposed
Conditions
14.28
14.96
-0.09
-0.05
50247
Optional Grading
14.29
14.96
-0.04
-0.05
46977.1
Effective
13.89
14.53
--
--
46977.1
Corrected Effectve
13.88
14.52
--
--
46977.1
Existing Conditions
13.88
14.52
-0.01
-0.01
46977.1
Proposed
Conditions
13.88
14.52
0.00
0.00
46977.1
Optional Grading
13.88
14.52
0.00
0.00
43347
Effective
13.33
14.00
--
--
43347
Corrected Effectve
13.33
14.00
--
--
43347
Existing Conditions
13.33
14.00
0.00
0.00
43347
Proposed
Conditions
13.33
14.00
0.00
0.00
43347
Optional Grading
13.33
14.00
0.00
0.00
39341
Effective
12.76
13.45
--
--
39341
Corrected Effectve
12.76
13.45
--
-
39341
Existing Conditions
12.76
13.45
0.00
0.00
39341
Proposed
Conditions
12.76
13.45
0.00
0.00
39341
Optional Grading
12.76
13.45
0.00
0.00
34698
Effective
11.96
12.72
--
-
34698
Corrected Effectve
11.96
12.72
--
--
34698
Existing Conditions
11.96
12.72
0.00
0.00
34698
Proposed
Conditions
11.96
12.72
0.00
0.00
34698
Optional Grading 1
11.96 1
12.72 1
0.00 1
0.00

lv d
River Sta
Plan
Water Surface Elev
ft
Change Relative to
1 pct
1 pct FW
Corrected Effective
ft
31358.9
Effective
11.37
12.20
--
--
31358.9
Corrected Effectve
11.37
12.20
--
--
31358.9
Existing Conditions
11.37
12.20
0.00
0.00
31358.9
Proposed
Conditions
11.37
12.20
0.00
0.00
31358.9
Optional Grading
11.37
12.20
0.00
0.00
30383.3
Effective
10.67
11.55
--
--
30383.3
Corrected Effectve
10.67
11.55
--
--
30383.3
Existing Conditions
10.67
11.55
0.00
0.00
30383.3
Proposed
Conditions
10.67
11.55
0.00
0.00
30383.3
Optional Grading
10.67
11.55
0.00
0.00
30339.3
Effective
10.09
10.94
--
--
30339.3
Corrected Effectve
10.09
10.94
--
--
30339.3
Existing Conditions
10.09
10.94
0.00
0.00
30339.3
Proposed
Conditions
10.09
10.94
0.00
0.00
30339.3
Optional Grading
10.09
10.94
0.00
0.00
29287
Effective
9.94
10.82
--
--
29287
Corrected Effectve
9.94
10.82
--
--
29287
Existing Conditions
9.94
10.82
0.00
0.00
29287
Proposed
Conditions
9.94
10.82
0.00
0.00
29287
Optional Grading
9.94
10.82
0.00
0.00
28145
Effective
9.84
10.74
--
--
28145
Corrected Effectve
9.84
10.74
--
--
28145
Existing Conditions
9.84
10.74
0.00
0.00
28145
Proposed
Conditions
9.84
10.74
0.00
0.00
28145
Optional Grading
9.84
10.74
0.00 1
0.00
Conclusion
The Nichols Sand Pit, both existing and proposed excavation within the regulatory floodway along the Tar
River, will not cause any increase in either the 1 % annual chance or the 1 % annual chance floodway
elevations.
4

Source
Table 8 - Flooding Sources Studied by Detailed Methods
Riverine Sources Affected Communities
I Parkers Creek
The confluence with Tar River
Approximately 1,950 feet upstream of
City Of Greenville
Industrial Boulevard (SR 1591
Inelog Branch
The confluence with Little Contentnea
Approximately 1,510 feel upstream of
Pitt County
Creek
Fred Drive (SR 1266
Pinelog Branch North Tributary
The confluence with Pinelog Branch
Approximately. 0.6 mile upstream of the
Pitt County
confluence with Pinelog Branch
Pinelog Branch South Tributary
The confluence with Pinelog Branch
Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of
Pitt County
Stantonsburg Road (SR 1200
Reedy Branch
At the confluence with Green Mill Run
Approximately 400 feet upstream of the
City Of Greenville
Railroad
Swift Creek
Approximately 0.3 mile downstream of
Work
Approximately 0.4 mile upstream of
City Of Greenville
confluence Swamp
Davenport Farm Road
Pitt County Town Of
Ayden Town Of
Winterville
Swift Creek
Approximately 0.4 mile downstream
Approximately 380 feet upstream of
City Of Greenville
Fodines Road (SR 1126)
Thomas Langston Road (SR 1134)
Pitt County
Town Of Winterville
Swift Creek Tributary 2
The confluence with Swift Creek
Approximately 0.9 mile upstream of the
Pitt County
confluence with Swift Creek
Town Of Winterville
Tar River
Approximately 0.4 mile downstream of
PitUEdgecombe County Boundary
City Of Greenville
Gdmesland Bridge Road
Pitt County
Town Of Falkland
I
Town Of Grimesland
villaae Of Simpson
114
Tar River (Approximately 100 feet downstream of IAppmximalely 0.5 mile downstream of I Pitt County
Legget Road confluence of Sapony Creek
Tranters Creek I The confluence with the Tar River I Appmximately 2.6 miles upstream of U.S. I Pitt County
Table 9, "Flooding Sources Studied by Detailed Methods: Redelineated", lists all flooding sources that were studied by detailed
methods for the pre- statewide FIS and redelineated for previous FISs. These flooding sources were not part of this revision and their
effective analyses remain valid.
Table 9 - Flooding Sources Studied by Detailed Methods: Redelineated
Source
Riverine Sources
Affected Communities
From
To
Lateral No. 1
Confluence with Parkers Creek
U.S. Highway 13
City Of Greenville
Lateral No. 2
Confluence with Parkers Creek
U.S. Highway 13
City Of Greenville
Little Contentnea Creek
Approximately 0.16 mile downstream of
Chinquapin Road
Approximately 100 feet downstream of
Edward May Road
Pitt County
Town Of Fannville
Meeting House Branch
Confluence with Bells Branch
King George Road
City Of Greenville
Parkers Creek
Confluence with Tar River
Approximately 800 feet upstream of
confluence of Lateral No. 2
City Of Greenville
Table 10, "Flooding Sources Studied by Detailed Methods: Limited Detailed", lists all flooding sources within the county that were
studied by limited detailed methods for either this FIS or previous FISs.
Table 10 - Flooding Sources Studied by Detailed Methods: Limited Detailed
Riverine Sources
Affected Communities
mm To
Back Swamp
Confluence with Swift Creek Approximately 0.3 mile upstream of
Pitt County
Hanrahan Road
Town Of Ayden
Town Of Griffon
Black Swamp
0.1 mile upstream of the confluence with
Confluence of Langs Mill Run
Pitt County
Jacob Branch
Town Of Fannville
Briery Swamp
Confluence with Tranters Creek
Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of
Pitt County
Staton Mill Rd
Briery Swamp Tributary
Confluence with Briery Swamp
Approximately 0.77 mile upstream of
Pitt County
State Hwy 903
Buckleberry Canal
Confluence with Neuse River
Approximately 0.9 mile upstream of Rock
Pitt County
Road
leeks Mill Creek
Confluence with Tar River
Approximately 60 feel downstream of Britt
Pitt County
Farm Road
Chicod Creek
Approximately 0.9 mile upstream of Dixon
At confluence of Harding Swamp
Pitt County
Road
Clayroot Swamp
Confluence with Swift Creek
Approximately 1,300 feet upstream of
Pitt County
V.O.A. Site B Road
Flood Insurance Study Report: PITT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Page 18 of 65
Effective Date: June 19, 2020

Table 13 - Summary of Discharges
Flooding Source
Discharges (cfs)
Location
Drainage Area
(square miles)
10% Annual
Chance
2% Annual 1%Annual
Chance Chance
0.2% Annual
Chance
Swift Creek
Approximately 800 feet downstream of Fodines Road (SR 1126)
6.97
620
1129
1404
2201
Approximately 1,300 feet downstream of Davenport Farm Road (SR 1128)
4.24
457
847
1060
1684
Approximately 430 feel upstream of Davenport Farm Road (SR 1128)
3.89
433
806
1010
1607
Approximately 0.5 mile downstream of sterling Trace Drive (SR 2115)
2.30
314
594
750
1211
Approximately 200 feet upstream of Thomas Langston Road (SR 1134)
1.68
259
496
628
1023
Swift Creek Tributary 1
Just upstream of confluence with Swift Creek
2,66
814
Approximately 0.8 mile upstream of confluence with Swift Creek
1,82
657
Approximately 0.2 mile downstream of Highway 11
1,32
546
Swift Creek Tributary 2
The confluence with Swift Creek
1,11
200
389
496
817
Tar River
At confluence with Tranters Creek
291T54
30400
46700
55000
77900
Approximately 1.3 miles downstream of confluence with Chicod Creek
2899.34
30300
46500
54800
77600
At the confluence of Grindle Creek
2756.83
29500
45200
53100
74900
At State Highway 222
2521.00
28200
43000
50400
70500
At the Edgecombe/Pitt County boundary
2459.00
27800
42400
49600
69200
Thomas Canal
�t the confluence with Conetce Creek
1.37
559
Thorofare Swamp
Just upstream of confluence with Clayroot Swamp
2.21
733
Just upstream of Hubert Boyd road
0.81
415
Approximately 0.6 mile upstream of Hubert Boyd road
0.66
369
Tranters Creek
Approximately 1.1 miles upstream of Clarks Neck Road (SR 1567)
237.00
5380
8631
10253
14616
Approximately 4.6 miles downstream of U.S. Highway 264
228.08
5301
8511
10114
14427
Approximately 0.9 mile downstream of U.S. Highway 264
225.19
5260
8449
10041
14329
Approximately 0.7 mile upstream of U.S. Highway 264
171.73
4452
7222
8613
12381
Approximately 1.8 miles upstream of U.S. Highway 264
169.90
4423
7177
8561
12310
At the confluence of Poley Branch
157.47
8200
At the confluence of Briery Swamp
116.74
1
16920
At the confluence of Bear Grass Swamp
89.19
5940
At the confluence of Collie Swamp
31.01
3269
At the confluence of Flat Swamp
3.17
899
Tributary to Little Contentnea Creek Tributary 1
Just upstream of confluence with Little Contentnea Creek Tributary 1
3.50
951
Approximately 0.4 mile upstream of confluence with Little Contentnea Creek Tributary
1
3.40
935
Tyson Creek
Al the confluence with Tar River
22.37
2720
At the confluence of Lawrence Run
11.71
1880
1.
Approximately 0.6 mile downstream of Seven Pines Road
3.88
1010
Flood Insurance Study Report: PITT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Page 30 of 65
Effective Date: June 19, 2020

Table 22 - Floodway Data
Floodway Source
I Floodway
Water Surface Elevation
Cross Section
Distance (Feet
Mouth)
Width (Feet)
Section
re Area
(Square Feet)
Mean Velocity
(Feet Per
Regulatory
Without
Floodwadway
With Floodway
Increase
Second)
•arkers Creek
130
12,957
154.0
852.0
2.7
22,42
19A
20.4
1.0
137
13,711
236.0
1225.0
1.9
22.42
204
21.4
1.0
145
14,456
315.0
1546.0
1.5
22.42
21.0
22.0
1.0
150
14,956
276.0
1624.0
1.4
22.42
21.4
22.4
1.0
159
15,939
529.0
2509.0
0.9
22.42
21.9
22.8
0.9
172
17,223
452.0
2586.0
0.9
22.42
22.3
23.3
1.0
180
18,049
234.0
1186.0
1.9
23.3
23.3
24.0
0.7
186
18,604
254.0
1205.0
1.8
23.7
23.7
24.5
0.8
188
18,843
253.0
1295.0
1.4
23.8
23.8
24.7
0.9
195
19,494
32L0
1512.0
1.2
24.1
24.1
25.0
0.9
Tar River
281
28,145
5700.0
60708.0
0.9
9.8
9.8
10.7
0.9
293
29,287
5550.0
60466.0
0.9
9.9
9.9
10.8
0.9
303
30,339
5342.0
41921.0
1.3
10.1
10.1
10.9
0.8
304
30,383
5342.0
42906.0
1.3
10.7
10.7
11.6
0.9
314
31,359
5248.0
58776.0
0.9
11.4
11.4
12.2
0.8
347
34,698
5835.0
61357.0
0.9
12.0
12.0
12.7
0.7
393
39,341
4423.0
59578.0
0.9
12.8
12.8
13.5
0.7
433
43,347
4562.0
61895.0
0.9
13.3
13.3
14.0
0.7
'70
46,977
4278.0
53865.0
1.0
13.9
13.9
14.5
0.6
2
50,247
5099.0
63318.0
0.9
14.4
14.4
15.0
0.6
531
53,127
5549.0
59918.0
0.9
14.8
14.8
15.4
0.6
557
55,678
5098.0
56612.0
1.0
15.2
15.2
15.8
0.6
579
57,866
4907.0
59181.0
0.9
15.5
15.5
16.1
0.6
616
61,617
4530.0
62042.0
0.9
16.1
16.1
16.7
0.6
646
64,572
4762.0
69990.0
0.8
16.6
16.6
17.1
0.5
681
68,086
5244.0
75623.0
0.7
17.0
17.0
17.5
0.5
738
73,798
5547.0
79110.0
0.7
17.7
17.7
18.2
0.5
914
91,4335
4180.0
65543.0
0.8
21.3
21.3
22.2
0.9
933
93,2595
3735.0
43879.0
1.2
21.5
21.5
22.4
0.9
973
97,2886
3441.0
61354.0
0.9
22.0
22.0
22.9
0.9
1106
110,6005
4196.0
77589.0
0.7
24.4
24.4
25.2
0.8
1165
116,4605
5196.0
92315.0
0.6
24.6
24.6
25.5
0.9
Tranters Creek
118
11,841
562.0
5731.0
1.8
6.16
5.4
6.4
1.0
127
12,718
390.0
4609.0
2.2
6.16
5.5
6.5
1.0
136
13,636
227.0
4030.0
2.5
6.26
5.6
6.6
1.0
142
14,207
210.0
3749.0
2.7
6.36
5.7
6.7
1.0
149
14,919
290.0
4378.0
2.3
6.36
5.8
6.8
1.0
155
15,492
265.0
4199.0
2.4
6.36
5.8
6.8
1.0
'S1
16,110
279.0
4512.0
2.3
6.46
5.9
6.9
1.0
8
16,762
370.0
4639.0
2.2
6.46
5.9
6.9
1.0
182
18,207
720.0
6541.0
1.6
6.56
6.1
7.1
1.0
189
18,904
508.0
6079.0
1.7
6.66
6.2
7.2
1.0
Flood Insurance Study Report: PITT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Page 55 of 65
Effective Date: June 19, 2020

F•
ivers ENGINEERS
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
TO: Don Parrott
1003 Red Banks Rd
Greenville, NC 27858
PLANNERS SURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCRITECTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date _ _ Job No.
February 10, 2022 2021122
ATTENTION: -� -
Don Parrott
�UBIECT: -- -�
Nichols Sand Pit - No -Rise Certification
Alvin Rd
PittCounty, NC
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU Q Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover via _ -_ courier - - the following items:
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other
_COPIES - - DATE_ i - No. DESCRIPTION
1 2/10/2022 Nichols Sand Pit No Rise Certification - Hard Copy
1 2/10/2022 Nichols Sand Pit No Rise Certification - CD
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
0 For Approval ❑ Approved ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For Your Use ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Disapproved ❑ Return copies for approval
❑ For Review and Comment ❑ Other Forward to NCFMP for concurrence
REMARKS
Don,
As requested, here is a hard copy of the No -Rise submittal package. We have also include 1 cctntaipitlg all
digital data. Let us know if you need anything else. 9k����.c' �I VV ��LL1I
FEB i 6 2022
LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
With best regards,
COPY TO SIGNED:
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notes us at once Matthew J. Prokop, PE
mprokop(cD rive rsaInd associates. com
107 E. Second Street, Greenville, NC 27858 • PO Box 929, Greenville, NC 27835 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
NCBELS Lic. No. F-0334 www.riversandassociates.com NCBOLA Lic. No. C-312