79-06_2_Redacted

V
loof
NORTH CAROLINA _
Department of Environmental Quality

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
December 3, 1993
Mr. Mitch Scott
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, N.C. 27622
RE: Permit No. 79-06
Reidsville Quarry
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Scott:
Cam. E H IV FI
Your recent request to have the.above referenced mining
permit modified has been approved. The modification is to
include the addition of 10.2 acres of adjacent land and the
construction of a berm with associated erosion and sediment
control measures as indicated on the Sediment and Erosion Control
Plan, Reidsville - Berm Addition (11.X 17 inch 'sheet) dated
October 6, 1993 and the Mine Map last revised October 7, 1993. A
copy of the modified permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily
upon the initial application. Modifications were made as
indicated by the modification request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date,
mine name and permit number shall remain the same as before the
modification. I would like to draw your particular attention to
Operating Conditions No. 4.F. of the modified permit.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to
it does not supersede local, zoning regulations. The
responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning
regulations lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 192.2
acres and the amount of land you are allowed to disturb at any-
one time is 135.2 acres.
Geological Survey Section Land Qualify Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
RO. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post-consvr6or paper

Mr. Scott
December 3, 1993
Page 2
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at
[phone] should you have any,questions concerning this
matter.
Sincerely,
Hacyvis, E.I.T.
ialist
Land Quality Section
TEDytls
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Miller

DEPARTMENT C71F ENV= R©NMENT
H EALTH AND NATURAL
RESOURCE S
D = V= S = ON OF' LAND RESOURCE S
LAND QUAT,2TY SECT=ON
P E R M T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Reidsville Quarry
Rockingham County - Permit No. 79-06
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: December-142002

Page 2 of 11
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation; by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise,'the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to'the successor
operator, provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is -not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may'give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context_
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
December 14, 1992: This permit has been modified to include and
allow the construction of the berm and associated sediment and
erosion control measures as indicated on.the Mine Map Erosion
Control Inserts "A" & "B" dated October 29, 1991 and revised
October b, 1992. This modification also increases the permitted
acreage to 182 acres as indicated on the Mine Map dated February
3, 1987 and revised October 13, 1992.

Page 3 of 11
December--3,- 1993: This permit has been modified to include 10.2
acres of adjacent land and to.allow the construction of a berm,
with associated erosion and sediment control measures as
indicated on the Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Reidsville -
Berm Addition (11 X 17 inch sheet) dated October 6, 1993 and the
Mine Map last revised October 7, 1993.
ExpirationDate
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until December 14, 2002.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry „Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be
in accordance with the permitting requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the
site shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission. It shall be
the permittee's responsibility to contact the Water
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management,
to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to
the.requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission..
B., During quarry operation, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust
from leaving the permitted area.'
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations
promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Page 4 of 11
M
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway to prevent
sedimentation of that waterway from erosion of the
affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse.
C. The buffer zones shown on the Mine Map dated February
3, 1987 and last revised October 7, 1993 shall be
maintained to prevent caving of any adjoining property
and to allow grading of the side slopes to the required
angle. These buffer zones,.with the exception of the
installation of required sediment control measures and
earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed:
Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited
to diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt
check darns, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or
ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment
from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into
any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to the
affected land.
B. The Mine Map, dated February 3, 1987 and revised
October 13, 1992 and the Erosion Control Inserts "A" &
"B" dated October 29, 1991 and revised October 6, 1992
shall be followed.
C. The sediment basin'at the southern end of the proposed
berm (insert "B") with the dimensions of 641L X 301W x
31© shall be located upgradient (northern side) of the
outlet channel to the existing pond.
A. The channel below the 36" culvert in insert "A" shall
be provided with an appropriate temporary lining at
time of final stabilization.
E. Slope drains shall be added, as necessary, to safely
convey surface water run-off down the side slopes of
all proposed earthen berms.
F. The Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Reidsville -
Berm Addition (11 X 17 inch sheet) dated October 6,
1993 shall be followed for the proposed berm addition
indicated on the Mine Map last revised October 7, 1993.

Page 5 of 11
G. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be
submitted to the Department for approval prior to any
land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the
approved application for renewal of this mining permit
and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include,
but are not limited to, expansion outside of the
initial pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of
overburden disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
A. Groundwater observation wells shall be installed as
indicated on the Mine Map dated February 3, 1987 and
revised October 13, 1992.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into
consolidated rock and grouted to the surface. The
wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into
unweathered rock, whichever is deeper. The wells shall
be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits to construct these wells
shall be obtained from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
C. The observation wells shall be monitored twice a year
(biannually). The static water level shall be measured
with an accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be
referenced to a datum point and a record of the water
level maintained. The results of these observations
shall be provided to the Winston-Salem Regional Office,
Groundwater Section.
D. Additional groundwater monitoring wells shall be
installed and/or monitoring schedules may be changed as
deemed appropriate by the department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater
than the angle which cah be retained by vegetative cover or
other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated
channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage
because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided
with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such erosion.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent
collection of pools of water that are, or likely to become,
noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage
ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.

Page 6 of 11
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
.findings of any seismic studies conducted at this facility.
The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production
blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property
from thrown rock or vibrations:
A. In all.blasting operations, except as hereinafter
otherwise provided, the maximum peak particle velocity
of any component of ground motion shall not exceed 1
inch per second at the immediate location of any
building outside of the permitted-area'regularly
occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, -public building, or commercial or
institutional building outside of -the permitted area.
The operator shall monitor each blast with a
seismograph.
B. - Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels
linear (DBL) as measured at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building such as any dwelling
house, church, school, public building, or commercial
or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to
insure that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where
the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by the
operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the guarded area
or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department
immediately and further use of explosive at the site
shall be immediately suspended until the following
actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation'as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation
shall be provided to the Department within 10 days
of the incident. Said report shall, at a minimum,
document the cause(s) of the incident along with
technical and management actions that will -be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the
Department before blasting may resume at the site.
Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock
and repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a
violation of this permit.

Page 7 of 11
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual
blast describing: the total number of holes; pattern
of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of
holes; type and total pounds of•explosives; maximum
pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records
shall -be maintained at the permittee's mine office and
copies shall be provided to the Department upon
request.
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department,
give 24 hour advance notice to the Land Quality Section
prior to any blast during a period for which notice is
requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -
to -end or fencing shall be maintained at all times around
the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent -public
access. In addition, a minimum 10 foot wide horizontal
safety bench shall be provided at the junction between the
top of rock and the toe of the overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the
mine and,public thoroughfares to screen the operation
from the public. Additional screening methods, such as
constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Map dated February 3, 1987 and last revised
October 7, 1993. In addition to grasses, loblolly
pines and Leyland Cypress shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and
noise buffering.
11. Plan -Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the
desire to delete, modify or otherwise change any part -•of the
mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for renewal of this
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Approval to
implement such changes must be obtained from.the Department
prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.

Page 8 of 11
12.
13.
14.
Refuse Disoosal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
are generated outside of the mining permit area shall
be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization -to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be..consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that maybe considered hazardous
shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $251'000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover
the operation as indicated on the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be
valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 9 of 11
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the
performance of which is a condition on the continuing validity of
that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the
terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum_ Standards As Provided By G_.S.74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel
and other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle
as'to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent
with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property
must be provided in all excavations -in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration
which is in accordance with accepted conservation practices
and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or
remain on the mined area that are, likely to become noxious,
odiousor foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and
recommended agronomic and reforestation practices as
established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to
the Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities
shall be'conducted according to the time schedule included
in -the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations -and in any
event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time
after completion or termination of mining on any segment of
the permit area and shall be completed within two years
after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule,
the planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry
excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any highwall, and grade and
revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 10 of it
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a
surface suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden
or waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any.settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded,. and stabilized or cleaned out and
made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or
otherwise prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the
mine site. On -site disposal of waste shall be in
accordance with Operating Condition 12A and B.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the
collection of noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according
to the Revegetation Plan prepared by Ms. Carole Cameron
dated December 13, 1991 with the stipulation that Ladino
clover shall be added to the seeding mixture at a rate of 5
pounds per acre and Virgina pines shall be deleted from the
vegetation plan.

Page. 11 of 11
Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to
the extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be
initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be
completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued October 24, 1974, renewed May 18, 1982,
and renewed and modified December 14, 1992, is hereby
modified this 3rd day of December, 1993 pursuant to G.S_ 74-
52.
By: /�(Z'
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

aF !ham �'uust�,a' �wn,✓� � Puf/+�t�- Zs�uax�.r d`"
N-

J
J
J
1.
.
J,
1
�+ r,
.t
n
7?'
1
I

State. pf.,North.Ccrolina
n ri i . . . . . . r_1 r rin M+ r f�r n Mn
A n
:Health`dhd Natural Resburce's
d Resources
Divisl6n' 6f Ldn' R' ces
MIMI
K."
.`Jr',; GoVe rhor J srB.­HLYht
S
na n :1 o�ves, ecebt&y jo 'B! H�'
66' AM,
14, -6 er;-
r. C �iaji i 6 s'� �G &r n­` P G.�, P: E.
A
G�
E) I r616f 661oglst.D
1
J September.' 7 1994 `1 ',K
c Z C
CERTIFIED
RETURN -'OR)EtE IPT­' REdohkjt
Z.,
�J 5
mr 1416raibelyi-1 1666,,r, j.
ar, v t�vne Vc,"
'Martin .-Marrie tta,,TA4grdgates:%
P b --Box' 30013
"Ral'e'lcrh -5 7 N C -L 27622OO13
i'RE: Recl�aiinstion B6'n'd%Replacement
'on:
Your request.,to replace the Reclamation Bond for Martin Marietta
Aggregates. has been approved. We have.recei'ved. the new .$500,'000.00
surety - bond and are enclosing the''$25 000.00;-blahket.,,bond..--.,(#2,039466)
as requested .
ted.f6r your.use. The-bl6nket
"T' 57�Oname
,
of Salem Stone Company was releaseddL--on --.September 24,'e,,1993kz '�(see
attached. letter)'. The following -'.permits . are now covered by thi's new
bond: ao
Burlin'gton.Quarry uarry
-o2 0i '01-09:, -�ao Hawj�Rivdi�
-10 2 6 ­��o 1-raster'
04 08 Pee Dee Quarry
13-23 Bonds Gravel Pit i3-25 ,,aR6'6ky7z-.Ri�i - e'4F,,,,Quar.ry.,-
18-01 Hickory Quarry 19`1'02"-� a-, giti e r'J'City"
�Quarry
23-02 Kin.gs,Mountain .Quarry - 25'-:- 02,5.cL1,1New-f,,hern ' '1j, uarry-.,-..,
Clarks Quarry y
25--:12i*�-'
Q
Sal6i." uarry Frankl:in,�Q
3 4 Z6 9' ­
3 6 -zA 2;,-. Bessemer :City_ Quarry 3 6 '2 5._ G.a,ston,-,'Qua
4i. �,-QP
Jamebtownuarry 0 5!1. omona Qua
41-66--'H i c' '61n"'e Quarry el(cllonk, -
.:
A 9 - 10 It Statesville 5 118o n
.5 -.Quarry
55--:92r,';­'- -Denvdr,.Quarry-
6 0'-'02 'Charlotte. -:Quarry'
h -.,Quarr,y,,.
4'- ­`VNds
6 .181
f aS iirid - 1.
7,7,-'0 3
'R
_ C�
b
j3aiers(;Quarry,_�
92'�
-
Durham :Quarry,
;'Yadkin�,
ir J.
�,�G9010gica.. Survey section �4'-c,-*'L-an Ual'Ity'sui-6411
(919)733-*4574
ky� I Y)
T�
IFA K 7337-2876,,I
P.O.; 1136x 27687'Rd161gh: IN16fth CCF61irid 27611-7687.v.', Telex
An'Equal OpportunRy Afflrm&flveAcAon Employer &3%
�5 3:;
Lemon
6 O�', 'A rrowpociii,
.6
uar
2d 9,�-�L,��,­`-` Z�.6,viiii
}T Ar P
0 -, ,
�,,,Roqky.�Poij
!­74 =0 2 X�
v1 'N�"-�--,F6untairff
7-"-02t-11�-.ds
"��Tt!Asheboro,l,
t7 9 9
.4
n A,,,ReiVJLk1
rW:11 - 5-
--zQWood1'eafa
'92t,01-,-,`,,� ",Garner., U
.92 =-'I
_4 quay,,,
Qu
V, Alz
M"
W
ion6,� ,l 9-7 33 3833 FAX 919-,7 3'3-'A
6)�clod/ .- I A post consumer
'-'"­
aipaper

2.
aWilisons��
_Mr
septembei 7,
�
1994 gn ,
'0
2 t�>
`3''r .ali
6 4
d t� yr- r rrPv tr 6
.:
k„
sr y c ..f
�'���tl et La!�...rati
a w • . .. .,,.
,As ' "this is ;'now- considered a modifitation"+tt'of*`the
operating"'•
conditions' -contained in each
of•youricompany!s mining'.permits,. please
;
attach of this letter
to each mining permit1-
a.'copy 0T
sthis;
°r,R,�„"t
Please=review thisl'nodificationiland,advise
To:ffi-cher"a=sk',v
mom!:
4574'should :you 'have any
question concerning .this matter{".�"Ra N
.
t Yam:•', a f
�'.
-
sincerely
k•�,n . ..ec.; _
l/ _-" .`!:� -l%.', '.-". _.' '� ` '.rye �f
,.4. x ,. .... -
:.Charles'H. Gardner,.P.G., P.E.
--CHG/tls.--Y. >UU:.!
St. o
- zrfS 53tY.i i?2 (^vc Cou-:: a. .:C0., t '(n ✓.:x 3'x P 1J4 ':n E9 artcari s
-:'-Enclosure u - +'.: ..
_� az.v 'nb4 r 1
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips
Mr. Doug Miller
�. • mf Mr-,' .Jerry;, cook.-
`.
-, 3fMr.sJohnBHolley •t
r7 ..,..y y-,] eliq ,• :Inn
L,'•': `:"
:Joe'{Glass
., i i :r>2^
Dan9Sams '.:
^"iron •i? 7 Y`
_
.. fiMr:s!F1oyd=Williams
to ,*.vnP3
- 4X { Jq, Mr.`TracyADaV
sq( n9g;} tl d'E
b'i't:SVQ dI Aa •(T
+1^'*5ll(:
' - YfF•T 45F? �d'k':9Q C • r.?
- 'i22S:f n.e0 a"m'41 Cr ' iq! f F. •
�-�,'lth;`
y, #'4Q MzoJ] 2
.•
'Y'1 St+Lp 9 io..li'S F� R ^•j) f f
WNDilAIL- f.0e4 Wa
3l j.iV t331 '� �k �' yd, �f "t+„7M:, ., t r
"- �.•x- 4
sE t a t .� a�
I b. P�v+ h3-fD ' 't
'.
�
-,•� �
•,4
t9Ta.0 tl .00tG,X �Yi.- ,11:.
yX FGIv-n i✓3V $, �7.,
��.tlT
T.
j,1,Tk1C�} "�f.A J �� �l�
v1Y 311e2f<12F+.ifiF`'=M
? ryi,' kTFsx �f f,ti
F
44Y•

RM
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
December 10, 1992
Mr. Tony Sample
Asst. Mining Specialist
N. C. Dept. of Environmental Health
and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section
P. Q. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Subject: Mining Permit Renewal
Reidsville Quarry
Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Sample:
POST OFFICE BOX 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622-0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
We would like to have our Reidsville Quarry permit modified as follows:
1. To increase the permitted acreage from 64 acres to 182 acres.
2. To include our proposed pit expansion and berm additions for which the total area
is less than 25 acres.
Also attached is our check #99-018109 in the amount of $250.00 to cover this modification.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC:lmm
davisltr.2

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
Q(�� � �� oyn,^, (PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME l W.U��.OA1'U/`C. 2. MINING PERMIT IY Q� 3.OPERATOR /y�/tUliYr' /'P, aieli .(c ne/.rp%f, 4. COUNTY /let%✓M Am--
5. ADDRESS AIf�4t8 6AU 76ff0 Ve Y, :un6Ee ,NC , p
6. Person (s) contacted at site Lk:/ l.r.0
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? ©Ves ❑ No 8. Pictures? _ _]Yes No
9. Date last inspected: / /� / yr7 10. Any mining since last inspection ®Yes QNd
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? s r-j No
If no, explain: (G� '7N'/
U
LAND
QUALITY uaerjl t
12. Is the mine incompliance with the Reclamation Contlltions of the Permit ? ❑ Yes ®No
12.Iexplainneincomplia.�cewrthILd.. �tE1IU ,I,,osa/c•.,./ri Z/ru•eN//itna�a�..A
/
13, Did any of the above deficiencies result in olfsile damage? ❑ Yes © No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage: /
14. Corrective measures needed and/ or taken:l..,,bmjr TKe .Oi.P.-, r�W&jtri�.n-.w4. ./2�� dn:,J
/f.�.® � 9.,�reenu�d.Xn.�n�t A..r, /ra e.- :✓n„e C� le.,i
6 r•
15. Other recommendations and comments: Gv,,,.cb. • .,2n DAni(0.,.�' 4eAGn✓�A.Af�F O - Fu�linF
r:/in.nm✓s'/.'�.w^P, i✓AJ'.�n�nC %lasGt l.IP n iw.a/iP.c,.�. 1r= ^t .
F /
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +I - map accurate ?
❑y Yes No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed 7 © Yes ❑ No Proposed date
16. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report. 19. Copy of Repod sent to operator C 1,
(date)
INSPECTED BY: ,EAUrm44. DATE: O%' /
V
Phone No: (�/g) f�9h _ 3;nFJ i
White copy 0 file Yellow wpy to Operator 7Isink popy Yo Miring Specialist—,
WM
cc .

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Qualily Section
'�'�'�.jz Telephone Log
Ds1c: /r r�� sheet J or—L
Time 16:LI0 yarn Call: Placed 9 JRcccired ❑
❑ pin Resumed ❑
I. Project'. /17efWI v 1 c O q -pp Count). iy&Ir�4 4�
2. Conversation wahh: Telephone: (- ) 7BCO
l — yC
3. affiliation: /rt/N A
4. Content of conve-m1oon: n A n
i r
/7r'sA»W Ah. :./ or. !F#e. J it dt- rfre 4 7
/N ;*A- Sw., KCs
CC!
Filed

F)
•
•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
October 21, 1993
K 9 M O R A N D U M
TO: Beth Chesson
FROM: Doug Miller ON—,"
RE: Reidsville Quarry Berm Addition
Permit 79-06
Rockingham County
Review of the resubmittal finds that it addresses little of
our comments concerning size of basins.
(1) All basins still reference disturbed area while the
Design Manual Mr. Scott references specifically states
drainage area.
This is important if plan will meet the requirements of
adequate controls to meet federal stormwater regulations. I
cannot in good professional judgement recommend approval when
this project will not meet requirements of state and federal
law.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
1 • �
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Leesho Fuller, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
September 21, 1993
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Douglas Miller
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
From: Sherri Knight � L
Groundwater Section
Through: Mitch Rose
Hydrogeological Technician LI
Subject: Mining Permit Application
MMA Reidsville Quarry Modification #79-06
Rockingham County
The Groundwater staff has reviewed the request for the mine site at the subject location.
The water table will be intercepted by Martin Marietta Aggregates, but this office agrees that
it is unlikely that groundwater will be adversely impacted by this quarry. Therefore, the
comments made by this section in 1992 still apply and we offer no objection to the proposed
plan at this time.
Thank you for this opportunity to comment.
8025 (North Point Boulevard, Suite 100. Winston -Salem, !North Carolina 27106-3203
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

N I N E S I T E R E V I E W
ROOTING TO DEN
Project Name M✓Y A 11P.(.tQ,0U1yXLJ
Referred to Larry Coble
Date 49 19 3
Return to Land Quality by 9�3o/4 3
Air Quality Comments
Due Completed - q 5
I
Comments attached w-
Ground Water Comments
Due p
Completed
Comments Attached le,!' MiA goSe q-22'93
Water Quality - Attached Sheet.
P.551GIdED TO

MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: IVI! %A lrlosviz.zr
Due:g/ SO Assigned to: L.E @ Completed 7-e 9-7-5
Approved by Larry Coble
Steve Mauney
REVIEW ISSUES:
Watershed/Stream Name and Classification U.T. eF Gio`F L sc s,�o �Lrr.0
Comments
PERMITS -
NPDES Permit required
Yes No
NPDES Permit Existing/Proposed No. /JCG 0200q
f(o
ez /.T O Sra[M ✓A TE.0 T//S �'M'tl CiE�
Non Discharge Permit Required
Yes No
Non Discharge Permit Existing/Proposed No.
Comments
._.J „C [k Of TH, /E.GN 4 �
✓s WekC .R ru.ra�y /uc� o✓
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Wetlands Disturbed by Activity ✓
Yes No/
401 Certification Required ✓
Yes No
Comments

DATE TO ASSISTANT 7—DATE SUSAN
LOGGED IN
,( �// AIMING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company Ak Project Name VV%Vi U-E
Permit No. County �1ctM` Date Received ID 5 43
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal © Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
2 ❑! Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
❑ Fee Received: Amount
Please
route
to:
FA
V00
Field
Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ other:
Date Routed
Date Routed-
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: (I (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Orange Copies to File Pink Copy to Susan

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
October 6, 1993
Ms. Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
POST OFFICE BOX 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622.0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
tpe' `
Subject: Additional Requested Information No 0,9190 10
Reidsville Quarry Berm Addition QUg4� 199J
Mining Permit No. 79-06'S+�
CT/O/V
Dear Ms. Chesson:
In response to your letter dated September 23, 1993, Martin Marietta would like to submit
the following information to address each of your concerns regarding the proposed berm
addition at our Reidsville Quarry.
1) As shown on the attached Temporary Diversion detail, a compacted perimeter
dike will be provided around the exterior of the proposed berm, thus directing
all drainage from the vegetated field north of the proposed berm either
around the berm or to the 24" CMP. The spillway dimensions which we are
using for our sediment traps are values taken directly from Table 6.60a in the
North Carolina Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. No
additional calculations should he required. Additionally, the diversion ditches
to each of the basins will be grass lined according to the previously submitted
seeding schedule.
2) The north eastern. most corner of the proposed berm has been adjusted to
allow for the drainage to flow through the diversion to trap number 4.
Grading will be done as necessary to insure that runoff is not allowed to
collect.
3) The Sediment Basin cross section has been revised to indicate that the core
of the rock dam will be constructed of #1 rip rap and that the total top width
is 6 feet. A revised detail is provided.
4) The proposed buffer between the berm and the property line has been
increased from 30 feet to 40 feet to allow for adequate room for the
installation and maintenance of the temporary erosion control measures.

i
I trust that the above information adequately addresses each of your concerns regarding this
modification. Should you have any questions or if any additional information is needed
regarding this matter, please contact me at 919/781-4550.
Sincerely,
0jt�'
scgd-
Mitch Scott
Environmental Engineer
Attachment
cc: Ken Roberson
Horace Willson
Harry Winchester

SED ENT &EROSION CONTROL
LAN
REIDSVILLE QPAIRRY - BERM ADDITION
SCALE: 1"=200'
NOi'E: All drainage from the heavily vegetated field North of the proposed berm u 11 be
I I directed towards the 24" CMP by the use of a perimeter dike which will be located
on the outside of the temporary diversion ditch. (See Temporary Diversion Detail)
Ae
ly
90')
�.•• ' / \ I I rev YyaT�n Mfsuesl , \
IS" SwQG �ent�1 u% PJPPn� \ 1A + 1 (
p�Ezl- soe�v cep ) RAP lset: w a
vdoq.,I L)10
Iry
/
�� \ \`Rv.�A�01�1 � 3 I I II �' ✓� 1 I
Ls LS.
\
LEGEND
}
— PROPERTY LINE OA:Sl sl�
.•. —'.- WATER '( \�I s \ \ \ / )/
�-SEDIMENT BASIN - ( j lv�/ \ \\ -�' �j ��\
--� - DIVERSION DITCH I I } 1 I /
—'—`-D --I SLOPE DRAIN / ` _ \ 1 ( MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
i Reidsville Quarry -Berm Addition
V Scale: V = 200'
Date: October 6, 1993

Top Of Berm
Carry Rip -Rap Up Sides ofSo Nway
91 RIP -RAP----)
#57 WASHED STONE —A
Tap ELEV oCLOFSTOBMWATER—
J
_ tiELAaD STDRAGE7ANEs
MAX. SEDIMENT DEPTH
See Schedule for \_Maximum Level Of Sediment Collected
Individual trap dimensions Clean Basin When This Level is Reached
Section Through Basin And Filter
No Scale
See S
Freeboard
Up Sides of Spillway
1 See Schedule I
Section Through Berm And Filter
No Scale
Rip -Rap
„L 1.5 MR r eeeonno
A57 Washed Stone
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
No Scale
m

CwHga Di�E
FLOW - T'_��I n—
�.a
Variaa• T.0" Min "J Varies: a'-0" Min.
r
PLACE MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF FLOW
USE ADDITIONAL FILL TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED HEIGHT AND WIDTH.
SEED AND MULCH DIVERSION CHANNEL AND DIKE IMMEDIATELY
AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CHOOSE AN APPROPRIATE SEEDING
MIXTURE FROM THE SEEDING SCHEDULE.
Temporary Diversion
Not to Scale
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
Date: October 6, 1993

State of North Ccftna
Department of ErARonment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
September 23, 1993
Mr. Mitch Scott
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0017
Re: Modification Request for the Reidsville Quarry
Mining Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Scott:
The initial review has been completed on your modification
request for the above referenced mine site. The following
additional information is needed to complete our review:
1) The total drainage areas must be taken into account when
designing the sediment traps. Calculations must be
provided to verify that the spillways of the proposed
traps can pass the 10 year design storm if the measures
are to be in place for less than one year or the 25 year
storm event if the measures are to be in place for more
than one year. Furthermore, calculations for the
diversion ditches have not been submitted to this office.
How do you intend to stabilize the diversion ditches?
2) It appears that drainage will have to flow uphill around
the berm at the north eastern -most corner of the proposed
berm before flowing into the diversion draining to trap
no. 4. Pools of stagnant water cannot be created by the
construction of this berm. How do you intend to address
the off -site drainage?
3) The cross-section through the sediment trap dam should be
revised to indicate that the core of the rock dam is
constructed of "#1 rip rap" and that the, total top width
shall be 6 feet.
4 ) The proposed buffer around the berm is 30 feet. However,
the width of trap no. 6 is 35 feet. It appears that
installation of trap no. 6 as designed is not feasible.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

s +�
Mr. Scott
September 23, 1993
Page 2
In order to complete the processing of your modification
request, please forward 2 copies of the requested information to my
attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Si ce
VW�
Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
BUC\
cc: Mr. Doug Miller
Mr. Charles Gardner

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
lf�%k
September 7, 1993
MEMORANDUM 4Z' 90..
TkSF
TO: B t e on CT/�y
FROM: Dour} Miller
RE: MMA Reidsville Quarry Modification #79-06
Rockingham County
Review of the plans for the proposed modification has been
completed. The following comments are offered:
(1) Sediment trap detail needs to show a minimum rip rap
outlet size of 5' thick at crest instead of 2' thick.
(2) 30' buffer should be left undisturbed and then
diversion ditch installed.
(3) All sediment traps are sized for disturbed area, not
total drainage.area. To attain adequate settling
efficiency, measures should have a surface area of .01
+ cfs to basin. This information has not been
provided. Basins 4, 5 and 6 could be undersized using
this criteria.
(4) The diversion on the far end of the proposed berm has
water running up hill 101 at the end of the berm
before it drains to basin #4. The beret should be
shortened at the end to avoid the valley or they need
to pipe the water under the berm.
Correction of these deficiencies prior to permitting is
appreciated.

•
•
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
August 3, 1993
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
8Z L z(f +fq,
POST OFFICE BOX 30013
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27622-0013�
TELEPHONE [phone]
Subject: Mine Map Modification
Reidsville Quarry, Rockingham County
Mine Permit No.79-06
Dear Mr. Davis:
Enclosed please find duplicate copies of a revised mine map to cover the addition of 10.2
acres of property which was recently added to Reidsville Quarry's lease area. Also enclosed
is a detailed sediment and erosion control plan which covers a berm addition which is
proposed for this property. Attached is check No. 99-01.9719 in the amount of $250.00 to
cover the permit modification fee for these changes.
The proposed berm will be added to the existing berm which is located Northeast of the pii
area. The attached mine map and sediment and erosion control plan shows the new
property line as well as the exact location of the proposed berm.
Should you have any questions or if any additional information is needed regarding this
modification, please contact me at 919/781-4550.
Sincerely,
Mitch Scott
Environmental Engineer
cc: Ken Roberts
Horace Willson
Harry Winchester

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
R]EH)SV LE QUARRY
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
REIDSVILLE QUARRY - BERM ADDITION
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN

7- IiIIIINA 46-12 d'50 - rn,,� T.;l

•
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1) Obtain proper approval from Land Quality for berm addition prior to construction.
2) Locate and flag area for berm limits as shown.
3) Install sediment basins and diversion ditches according to the submitted plans and
details.
4) Clear and grub the project area where necessary.
S) Construct the berm in accordance with the submitted details.
b) Direct all runoff to the erosion control structures.
7) Seed and stabilize all bare earth according to the attached seeding schedule.
NOTES
1) Inspection and maintenance of sediment basins and diversion ditches shall take place
monthly and/or after each major rainfall event. At such times, all damages shall be
immediately repaired and accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed. Any
necessary stone replacements shall also be made at this time. Structures shall be
reshaped to maintain the required design volumes.
2) Sediment basin and diversion ditch locations shall be adjusted in the field as necessary
to conform to the actual contours.
3) Silt fence will be immediately installed as a back-up measure where needed to insure
that no sediment leaves the property. Details are provided.
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
Sheet: 2 of 12
Date: August 3, 1993

SEDIlVIENT & EROSION CON] ALAN
-
' REIDSVILLE QUARRY -BERM AliDITION
SCALE: V 200'
fy-
;•" \/ i ��I 1I �/� \ 1 � l I / 1. 1 I
.••���^\ \\ I �y I /fir �\ i 1` ' I 1 1
!
(uuD,s(uR�3 �k l Fo
i0" 51oQE oval "tarp
�'' �/ grvvwPPP I 1 (E"R Y\E¢c�iola Lp He 44 ', \
f" I LEGEND
PROPERTY LINER l` ✓�/,- `�\ A \ E�SW� E /�^\ \ \.i \.. EN�-(i wJG�'�
\ \'•• ��
—SEDIMENT BASIN ..-� / `� Y� 'L
DIVERSION DITCH I 1 ) _ \ % \) , / \ MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
—SLOPE DRAIN - / — \ 1, —� �� / / / ` _ \ 1 Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
eco / / \ I Scale: V = 200' '
Sheet 3of 12
/ / o t_ — _ Date: August 3, 1993

MARTIN MARIETTA�WREGATES aoB Fu t4t3drlr�rntiotii
SHEET NO. -... OF 12
P.O.BOX 30013 CALCULATED By MSS DATE.3 eD=
RALEIGH, NC 27622 CHECKED By DATE
[phone] SCALE OM f: S AI r

MARTIN MARIETTAAREGATES JOB 0�'or�>Ijlotii
SHE£TNO. �4� OF r/
P.O. BOX 30013 CALCULATED 8Y 1±ja 4'f.n# DATE 5-05-94
RALEIGH, NC 27622 CHECKED BY DATE
[phone] SCALE
'N_.r?S f�reArwq� =iZ,SF/w r(G,e)...`

MARTIN MARIETTA)WREGATES 'OB Ry,rr��F. �Ew 1AooI lIco
SHEET NO. (o OF r Z
P.O. BOX 30013 CALCULATED By JJ� DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27622 CHECKED By DATE
[phone] SCALE

® •
SEDIMENT BASIN SCHEDULE
IIDS�ILI
CfiAIf1Y�_3I21�t17III(iT
WEIR LENGTH
TOP WIDTH x
TRAP
DISTURBED
SEDIMENT
DIMENSIONS
#
AREA - ACRES
STORAGE - CU.FT.
L' x W' x D'
BOTTOM WIDTH
up to
(EXISTING)
1
1.3
2340
60' x 30' x 3'
16' x 10'
up to
2
4.1
7380
60'x 35' x 3.5'
16' x 10'
up to
3
1.4
2520
40' x 20' x 3.5'
12' x 6'
up to
4
2.2
3960
50' x 25' x 3.5'
14' x 8'
up to
5
0.9
1620
30'x 15'x 3.5'
10' x 4'
up to
6
3.7
6660
c60'x 35_X3759
16' x 10'
Notes: Sediment traps are sized for the maxium disturbed area with 1 clean -out per year.
Sediment Storage Capacity in Months: 12 Months
Sediment Volume per Acre per Year: 1800 Cubic Feet
Sediment Depth Equivalent to: 0.5"per Acre
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Reidsville Quarry Berm Addition
Sheet: 7 of 12
Date: August 3, 1993

Carry Rip -Rap Up Sides of Spi#wa!
#f RIP -RAP
. Top Of germ
#57 WASHED STONE
f _
SEDItdENLST09A(3E.ZONE (Tf]TALBA:JN CGPALLI-N A
-au 7.5' MAX. SEDIMENT DEPTH
See Schedule for Maximum Level Of Sediment Collected
Individual trap dimensions Clean Basin When This Level is Reached
Section Through Basin And Filter
No Scale
- r—Corry Rip -Rap UP Sides of SpllAvay
See Schedule
Min. Freeboard j #t Rip -Rep
Section Through Berm And Filter
No Scale
1'MIN.
#57 Washed
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
No Scale

PLACE MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF FLOW.
USE ADDITIONAL FILL TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED HEIGHT AND WIDTH.
SEED AND MULCH DIVERSION CHANNEL AND DIKE IMMEDIATELY
AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CHOOSE AN APPROPRIATE SEEDING
MIMP.E FROM THE SEEDING SCHEDULE
Temporary Diversion `
Not to Scale MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
Sheet: 9 of 12
Date: August 3, 1993

MARTIN MARIETTA .roe RFlri`nL'®IZIJA4ay
GREGATES SHEET NO !
P.O. BOX 30013 CALCULATED BY rttF. DATE cf�•oi-RJR
RALEIGH, NC 27622 CHECKED BY DATE
(M) 781-4550 SCALE Wh2l jr 4rAi 6

�iL-T
FQ LE,
rr
r �
r,
rr
tJ I
T.rR.J E,+D 5E6rErJrS OF FENCE- 7D FcFrl
i
FRorJ-r �r,E,..1
'JE:r
Bke-- I'11PIpF1 OR E&Jpt,
3e."tJioE, -SGQI� To .5,1PPORT
awc2 smvueo TO FatE,
TnnP u.irr� FF.rIoaco
FLo1�
n U 5paP - WOpxfe- W NEr.P' / FENLE u.E FnePc
- Aop SEOAC r.rr
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGA3
' Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
Sheet: II of 12
Daze: August 3, 1993

0
is
SEEDING SCHEDULE AND SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES
SEEDING SCHEDULE FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
PLANTING DATES
March 1 - June 1
June 1 - September 1
September I - March 1
SEED MIX
Serica Lespedeza
(scarified)
KY-31 Fescue
Ladino Clover
RATES: LBS./ACRE
50
120
5
KY-31 Fescue 120
Sorghum - Sudan Hybrids 50
Ladino Clover 5
Serica Lespedeza
70
(unhulled; unscarified)
KY-31 Fescue
120
Abruzzi Rye
25
Ladino Clover
5
Fertilize seedbeds with 2 tons/acre lime and 500 lbs./acre 10-20-20.
Mulch with 2 tons/acre clean straw or hay.
Tack with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 sq. ft., or other tacking
agent approved by Owner.
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES:
1) Surface water control measures are to be installed according to plan.
2) Areas to be seeded shall be ripped and spread with topsoil (if available), 3"
deep. Total seedbed prepared depth shall be 4" to 6" deep.
3) Loose rocks roots and other obstructions shall be removed from the surface so
that they will not interfere with the establishment and maintenance of
vegetation. Surface for final seedbed preparation, at finish grades shown, shall
be reasonably smooth and uniform.
4) If no soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the seeding
specifications above. In addition, provide 15 lbs./1000 sq. ft. of superphosphate.
5) If soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the soil test report.
A soil test is recommended.
6) Lime and fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the soil during
seedbed preparation.
7) WATER all seeded areas and keep moist until new grass is established.
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Reidsville Quarry - Berm Addition
Sheet: 12 of 12
Date: August 3, 1993

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED
TO:
Susan B. Edwards
AUG 2 Q
�y93
Mining Program Secretary
Land Duality Section
LAND
QUALITY SEGT'IOi"
FROM:
Larry E. Warlick
District Wildlife Biologist
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE:
August I8, 1993
SUBJECT:
Mining Permit Modification
Request, Martin
Marietta
Reidsville Quarry — Permit
No. 79-06
Rockingham County, North Carolina
These comments are provided pertaining to Fish 8 Wildlife concerns
related to the mining permit modification request for Martin Marietta
in Rockingham County. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971,(G.S. 74-46 through 74-68,
15 NCAC 5; as amended, 1982).
The area where the new berm is to be constructed is open pasture and
fallow field. It appears that the berm area will have little if any
impact on woodland. There is an old wetland area adjacent to this berm
location site that could be impacted by construction or future mining.
It is not clear from the plan if this area would be impacted. The old
pond area is probably a former beaver pond. This should be checked as
to use of this area under the current mining permit.
We do not expect significant impacts to fisheries or wildlife resources
from activities associated with mining at this site. We are concerned
with the potential loss of wetlands.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the permit request. Please
contact us if we can be of further assistance.
CC. Harlan T. Hall, Wildlife Management
David Vow, Habitat Conservation

0
0

State of North A no
Department of Env ronment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner. P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
wI
From:
Re:
August 11, 1993
44
A �
�EHNFi
Mr. Steve Pozzanghera
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
Susan B. Edwards NorL-
MiningProgram Secretary
Land Quality Section
R(CEo� .L
Na°� aiw"
GapcoN6ram ,
Mining Permit Modification Request for Martin Marietta
Reidsville Quarry - Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham county
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit
application for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries
(G. S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by September 6. 1993 so that we may
complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals
and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and
sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain
erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be
greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it
is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up
a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS
WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Beth Chesson at [phone] if
you have any questions.
SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. Doug Miller
Gent oggical survey section Land Quality section Geodetic Sway section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Camara 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-conwmer pa per

DATE TO ASSISTAN — oZ-QI� DATE SUSAN 8
LAGGED IN
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company %(1AAProject Name
Permit No. �P"06 County VtXkJMi(. A" Date Received 4'
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal M Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
5
Please route to: r6t-, ATtkAt D
❑ w6,rw Field Office Date Routed
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
�G
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other:
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: qJ to (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
MPlease note the following:
road- Ptah% Fours 17ya JX/W
T�n*lJ(2
A
<t ASA+.k A r nr.x. AA i. TffE Fl l.c. S 1ZC7U 2✓,J . "rilAnhL S I
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office' Yellow and Orange Copies to File Pink Copy to Susan

m
4

E

9

G
EWE
C
—11
�
EE
F LiP
q un5
z53 F833 `rv� f a
Otm
33b c o 9 2 vnw c v a ..
III ,g���yy 2 �y
gzo k\�- -��'Ya F�
C tom
g °c d
� �
tp
gil
��'•,,
mod& _ 11I 1E np:,
i
! $ "
�Je
iy v aW° v v v 1 a a5�.
L $ -_
1.
€�I
\ go
Vo
-`r

S as ;y a r�u 99a .
4� 3�
m� &tera $ a <
Ap
m5x y :i 9
Ops�I ill-11 E3 �3ar '� gg m 6
Otto
O �06 ,
'' ari lam ryl � i � \lll - III
- Iry 63te-
it,14
a�I A
mIit 41
� e I
--------------
IX li
te
'Uv3
_ $ Il� m l rot.
1 /
it
a

F S;i
I? gR1[tl! S E{Lii �i€96
t 1iilE E({Ila
era 66 i
FF'1°�
E � �.
!`�Ilal!
d
[!I IEiI
t
lS�l
I.:1
t lEia!iS;�It!
yg
$, Yt
u g
I I
F
o! Ill !! s616 CI E !111 I!`s
•vLW
�
j3I'Illi"Iai II_i�
,�wm..
StIiI
!I�#It If
IPlII I II! ? ! t j
9�r
!u ! IBP 1!j!i!I1 !I jlllii;PPIP j
I°!IIEI'R II tll�{y! I
I I
P41{ 3
SI
illi;,!!'IIIiI!!!PIIltrllll.
"I{Eiili!ji l IIIIIIlje11
1l 911 �IIII!fili I!Illill!!i!I
I't i I fll!I 11If
lilh €
i.7�M
-4
it 4
P
gg
<2
s
m
n
_
is
�ot
of
ttt
W�
cn
m
U)
Od
4' j�1{9l
E1111
kll
la!i k
! l iil i
61) IY
to
C
q
Y. 1lE 1
I SS1
!.II�Vw
I
Y' /g1i°i ffli .l4
!11
ili lnelii
!P!!j
1��f^
�n
II
1! 614 S R
44t6
Vl�
I
F
iI!
I�IYi61
l6tl
t.
jS tl!!t
117p1!It'I
it al°
4l!91.
Hill
li
I
Ilillli i itl V
to a
!1!
. ° I
II
P! !
r
It e p�
Pa
H '
N zT
6JE��6
4
p `-
4
Oil
it
i
m
MA
m
ii
Isgj �17 t� S�.
iR 9151€1[ E5€Ii [r �%6R6S F 7j
lit I iLilI iil to
R
> � 5
if
! S 4,i i t i4`<leiu t -
`�i'd�l�li�l°-i
Mat! ! ! !It Ill j ll u I — Cl)
i �o
lit
!it!s !I it
1 4t IPlriialtp �
Hill I ,!,El it !P
c
I !! it!
I
C
y �
LS
/
/
'A3 9
\ °x
y�
pp
I
F
f
m

pa
zi
>
,! ^®
§\] ||
`\ . -- (
«
z °
\ /\P\
_<ƒ\ } ,#
` § \.
\ zz�j� /(
\ [}\°\. E \ ) /». i.
~2/ k d K & ) E :Z .

b
A
�
2
�
3
a
m
F
chi
p
i��
�
D
9
T
K:
m
m
0
E I
I
✓ F
D o D o
Ilk
D � t Ir
9 �� i S gF F

01,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Charles H. Gardner, P.C., P.F..
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary December 14, 1992 Director and State Geologist
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, N.C. 27622
RE: Permit No. 79-06
Reidsville Quarry
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
Your application for modification and renewal of Permit No.
79-06 for Reidsville Quarry in Rockingham County has been
approved. The modification includes the construction of the berm
and associated sediment and erosion control measures as indicated
on the Mine Map Erosion Control Inserts. "A" & "B" dated October
29, 1991 and revised October 6, 1992. This modification also
increases the permitted acreage to 182 acres as indicated on the
Mine Map dated February 3, 1987 and revised October 13, 1992. A
copy of the modified and renewed permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the permit modification and renewal were
based primarily upon the initial application. Modifications were
made as indicated by the modification and renewal request and as
requiredto insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The
new expiration date is December 14, 2002. I would like to draw
particular attention to Operating Conditions Nos. 1B, 4C, 4D, 4E
and 5.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 182
acres and the amount of land you are allowed to disturb at any
one time is 125 acres.
Ccologlcal Su„2y Seceon Iznd Quality Scaion Ceaclenc Sun Simon
[phone] (919) )334574 (919) 733-3g36
PO. 0 27667 • Utigh, NC 27611-7W • Telephone[phone]
An Equal Opwn my Alfionanw Aceon Empl y

Ms. Cameron
December 14, 1992
Page 2
Please review the renewed permit and advise this office at
[phone] should you have any questions concerning this
matter.
sin erely,
y Davis, E.I.T.
Mining specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/ TLS - --
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Miller

D E PAR`I`MENT O I' ENV = RONMEN'Z'
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RESC URCES
D=V=S20N C3V Y.AND RESOURCES
LAND QUAL T T Y S ECT = ON
P E R M = T --
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Reidsville Quarry
Rockingham County - Permit No. 79-06
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: December 14, 2002

Page 2 of 11
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the.permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or, other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted -mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator, provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
December 14, 1992: This permit has been modified to include and
allow the construction of the berm and associated sediment and
erosion control measures as indicated on the Mine Map Erosion
Control Inserts "A" & "B" dated October 29, 1991 and revised
October 5, 1992. This modification also increases the permitted
acreage to 182 acres asindicated on the Mine Map dated February
3, 1987 and revised October 13, 1992.

Page 3 of 11
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until December 14, 2002.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be
in accordance with the permitting requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the
site shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission. It shall be
the permittee's responsibility to contact the Water
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management,
to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to
the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust
from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations
promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway to prevent
sedimentation of that waterway from erosion of the
affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse.

Page 4 of 11
C. The buffer zones shown on the Mine Map dated February
3, 1987 and revised October 13, 1992 shall be
maintained to prevent caving of any adjoining property
and to allow grading of the side slopes to the required
angle. These buffer zones, with the exception of the
installation of required sediment control measures and
earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited
to diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt
check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or
ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment
from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into
any lake or natural watercourse in"proximity to the
affected land.
B. The Mine Map, dated February 3, 1987 and revised
October 13, 1992 and the Erosion Control In "A" &
"B" dated October 29, 1991 and revised October 6, 1992
shall be followed.
C. The sediment basin at the southern end of the proposed
berm (insert "B") with the dimensions of 6011L X 30% X
31D shall be located upgradient (northern side) of the
outlet channel to the existing pond.
D. The channel below the 36" culvert in insert "A" shall
be provided with an appropriate temporary lining at
time of final stabilization.
E. Slope drains shall be added, as necessary, to safely
convey surface water run-off down the side slopes of
the proposed earthen berm.
F. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be
submitted to the Department for approval prior to any
land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the
approved application for renewal of this mining permit.
Such areas include, but -are not limited to, expansion
outside of the initial pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden disposal areas.

Page 5 of 11
5. Groundwater Protection
A. Groundwater observation wells shall be installed as
indicated on the Mine Map dated February 3, 1987 and
revised October 13, 1992.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into
consolidated rock and grouted to the surface. The
wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into
unweathered rock, whichever is deeper. The wells shall
be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits,to construct these wells
shall be obtained from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
C. The observation wells shall be mo-nitored twice a year
(biannually). The static water level shall be measured
with an accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be
referenced to a datum point and a record of ,the water
level maintained. The results of these observations
shall be provided to the Winston-Salem Regional Office,
Groundwater Section.
D. Additional groundwater monitoring wells shall be
installed and/or monitoring schedules may be changed as
deemed appropriate by the department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater
than the angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or
other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated
channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage
because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided
with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such erosion.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent
collection of pools of water that are, or likely to become,
noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage
ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.

Page 6 of 11
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
findings of any seismic studies conducted at this facility.
The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production
blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property
from thrown rock or vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter
otherwise provided, the maximum peak particle velocity
of any component of ground motion shall not exceed-1
inch per second at the immediate location of any
building outside of the permitted area regularly
occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or
institutional building outside of the permitted area.
The operator shall monitor each blast with a
seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels
linear (DBL) as measured at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building such as any dwelling
house, church, school, public building, or commercial
or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to
insure that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where
the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by the
operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the guarded area
or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department
immediately and further use of explosive at the site
shall be immediately suspended until the following
actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation
shall be provided to the Department within 10 days
of the incident. Said report shall, at a minimum,
document the cause(s) of the incident along with
technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the
Department before blasting may resume at the site.
Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock
and repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a
violation of this permit.

Page 7 of 11
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual
blast describing: the total number of holes; pattern
of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of
holes; type and total pounds of explosives; maximum
pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records
shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and
copies shall be provided to the Department upon
request.
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department,
give 24 hour advance notice to the Land Quality Section
prior to any blast during a period for which notice is
requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -
to -end or fencing shall be maintained at all times around
the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public
access. In addition, a minimum 10 foot wide horizontal
safety bench shall be provided at the junction between the
top of rock and the toe of the overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the
mine and public thoroughfares to screen the operation
from the public. Additional screening methods, such as
constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Map dated February 3, 1987 and revised October 13,
1992. In addition to grasses, loblolly pines and
Leyland Cypress shall be planted as deemed appropriate
by the Department to improve visual and noise
buffering.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the
desire to delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the
mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for renewal of this
mining permit. Approval to implement such changes must be
obtained from the Department prior to on -site implementation
of the revisions.

Page 8 of 11
12.
13.
14.
Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
are generated outside of the mining permit area shall
be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposak facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that maybe considered hazardous
shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover
the operation as indicated on the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be
valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeological
Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 9 of 11
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the
performance of which is a condition on the continuing validity of
that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the
terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided_By_G._S_._ 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel
and other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle
as tofminimize the possibility of slides and be consistent
with the Future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property
must be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration
which is in accordance with accepted conservation practices
and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or
remain on the mined area that are, likely to become noxious,
odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and
recommended agronomic and reforestation practices as
established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to
the Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities
shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any
event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time
after completion or termination of mining on any segment of
the permit area and shall be completed within two years
after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule,
the planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry
excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any highwall, and grade and
revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 10 of 11
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a
surface suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden
or waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and
made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced,-subsoiled or
otherwise prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the -
mine site. On -site disposal of waste shall be in
accordance with Operating Condition 12A and B.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the
collection of noxious or foul water.
3. Reveaetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according
to the Revegetation Plan prepared by Ms. Carole Cameron
dated December 13, 1991 with the stipulation that Ladino
clover shall be added to the seeding mixture at a rate of 5
pounds per acre and Virgina pines shall be deleted from the
vegetation plan.

Page 11 of 11
Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to
the extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be
initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be
completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued October 24, 1974 and renewed May 18,
1982, is contemporaneously renewed and modified this 14th
day of December, 1992 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
By: 6m� .. //
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

MEMO! 1®
OATS
TO:SUBJECT: LlA�$✓,/�
C°o-rx�,J C.C. w: d-L ✓h � .
'to
From: f
OUP
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources �'s a„001R�Ioef

oc; 2 � t992
LAND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
October 27, 1992
T,
TO: Tony Sample
FROM: Doug Miller
RE: Reidsville Quarry
#79--06
Rockingham County
These drawings are packed with errors.
(1) Insert "A" states channel has a 15' base, while
section detail reference shows a 10' base. Which is
it?
(2) Should the sediment basin in Insert "B" for two acre
parcel go at the edge of the pit limits (i.e. edge of
disturbed area)?
(3) Sediment basin below existing pond at the end of the
future berm will have all water from the pond diverted
through it. It should be located on the other side of
the stream.
(4) How is channel to be stabilized?
If it is grass, a temporary liner is necessary. If this
office can provide other information, please contact us.
GDM/dh

on.

MA CAECKLTST FOR ROAG
Company /nr� ,sla.,d/. O ..d,Zte& Project Name je-u ,V C7w.
Permit No. 79-06 County 4vrl%�Jx� Date Received
Reviewer /�1
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office lffiiles and log in checks.
*❑1 NNew [ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
EIAdditional Information Received and Attached for Review
Please route to:
LJ l✓i.-;i - Field Office Date Routed
i
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other: Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Vfellow Copy to File Pink Copy to Susan

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
October 13, 1992
Mrs. Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
N.C. DEHNR
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Permit Renewal
Reidsville Quarry
Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Mrs. Chesson:
POST OFFICE BOX 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622.0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
e,^
h.
4,
O�
In response to your letter dated September 18, 1.992, I would like to submit the following
information:
1. The channel at the northeast corner of the pit was re-evaluated to ensure
stability during the 2S-year storm.
According to the revised Mine Map and Insert sheet, flow from the existing
pond in the future reserve area north of the pit will be carried in a 36"
diameter corrugated metal pipe and will outlet into a channel which will run
along the eastern edge of the pit. The 36" pipe will carry approximately 70
cubic feet per second (cfs). Overflow from the pond will go into the pit.
Once additional storage is available, water from the pit will be pumped into
the make-up water pond and will leave the site via the 36" pipe and channel.
This revision was discussed with you on October 1, 1992 by Lisa Beard of
Wm. Daniel & Associates. Design Calculations are attached.

•
•
2. The proposed monitoring well on the Eimer King property has been relocated
into the permit boundaries.
We trust that the attached information is sufficient for your review and approval.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC%lmm

Channel Design for Martin Marietta
Reidsville Quarry
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters:
Discharge
70 cfs From 36" diameter pipe
Side Slope
2 : 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
0.5 %
Manninls n
0.035 grass lining
Analysis:
Depth
1.36 feet
Area
20.5 ft•ft
Perimeter
17.0 ft
Velocity
3.4 fps velocity ok
Flow
70 cfs
Top Width
16.2 ft

VELOCITY DISSIPATORS
<=—====OUiLEf F
ROTECTION=====>
OUTLET
DIAMETER
SLOPE
a
V
ZONE
Length
Minimum
Rip -Rap
Rip -Rap
Width
Type
Thickness
(inches)
(%)
(cis)
(fps)
(ft)
(ft)
(inches)
EXISTING
36
10.00
70.0
17.0
I 5
30
10
Class 2
24
Note: Velocity
Dissipate
n design per NYDOT method.
Velocities hav3
been adjusted for less than full pipe flow.
•

'illiam G. Dar -A & -ss o ci at e s
Engr� eri-.g - Plarning - qcdsc,---ce Archte-cue
"1 467-9708
I
ica RSID5VIL-L-E--QUA22Y E.C-PLA�j
SHEET No, or
CALCUL,AYEO BY CATE Zqlq2
CHECKED By DATE
SCALE
T�y
d)= h4o;cg5
7
Mompkb W(LI AF L r
MIAIF-ME' WAT-e0 TH Pir�w L-F5E
��
b TO 7HE :mAKEi-UP WATER.WATER.'JD 4D
-1 A --rH:F- -3 (k P111>6 AW&
ITH"S FLLJ w 6F=-,.
i L
p A� 6VG4 P-F�L-ow I Kv!�-o rR F-
t
7
-TF

• r AAA[,i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor September 18, 1992 Charles H. Gardner, P.C., PE__
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director and State Geologist
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622
Re: Reidsville Quarry Renewal Request
Mining Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
The review has been completed on the additional information
submitted for the renewal of the mining permit for the Reidsville
Quarry in Rockingham County. The following information is needed
to complete our review:
1) As indicated in my letter to you dated February 7, 1992,
this office is concerned with the stability of the
channel- between the proposed 10 year pit limit and the
berm along the northeastern property line. The Erosion
and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual shear
stress analysis is limited to roadside ditches and is not
valid for large open channel flow. Therefore, this
E analysis is not valid for the size channel proposed.
Please provide calculations indicating that the channel
will be stable in the 25 year storm.
2) All monitoring wells must be within the permitted
boundaries. The monitoring. well on the Elmer King
property must be relocated into the permit boundaries.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT OUR REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL
ALL OF THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED.
In order to complete the processing of your renewal request,
please forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my
attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Geological Stsrvcy Section lapel Quality SCC601t Gcexictir Sutvev Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
P.O. Box 27687 • f2.ileigh, N.C. 27611-7687 0 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
September 18, 1992
Please advise at [phone] if you should have any
questions on the above.
SIIiAc. elly,
Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
BUC\
Co. Doug Miller.
Russell Briggs, William Daniels & Assoc.

TO •
r�
SPEED V,T�ER9
FROMf�,'/• DATE r
suRoECT ,llAA7} G IOC Z-IJ— ail I I ((Gln'f-7HAitl C6
MESSAGE
A�i}G(fL�� r5 hIJDr71GHJRt rNFU FOlL�
yDu'2' lZ�M�
II.�ASJf eduf� 7H�cr ob to -61al
rig WTA) f 4490 Ci tr�t�✓�3
�( C-rcr-� �rr/�92•
mlmnxnu o..o.e.. N W e w u e..
REPLY
SIGNED
UNDUE; MACH AND WAIN BELLOW CO". SEND WHITE AND PINY'COMES

s
N
I

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES POST OFnCEB X"13
MUI , W M CMOIINA 27622 W13
TELE NE 01W781-46W
July 27, 1992
Mrs. Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
N.C. DEHNR
land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
2
Raleigh, NC 27611
1992
RE: Permit Renewal
7,,.f11,J
Reidsville Quarry
Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Mrs. Chesson:
In response to your letter dated February 7, 1992, 1 am submitting the following additional
information:
1. Enclosed please find design calculations for all diversions and sediment basins
proposed on the Reidsville Quarry Mine Map. The diversion ditch and sediment pit
combination which appears in the pit is designed for the 10-year storm because the
combination will be in place and functioning for less than one year. All remaining
erosion control measures are designed for the 25-year storm because there is a
possibility that they will be functioning for more than one year. The determination
of design storm was made in accordance with NCDEHNR guidelines.
The channel is designed for the 100-year storm. Although calculations are not
included, shear stress on the lining was checked against the allowable shear stress
indicated in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual.
No land -disturbing activity occurs in the area below the outlet of the existing
sediment basin, therefore no additional erosion control measures were proposed for
that area. The silt fence and rock check dam are existing measures and are shown
only for completeness of the plan. They are not required for erosion control.

2. The locations of two groundwater monitoring wells have been added to the mine
map.
3. The nearest offsite dwelling is located on the map.
4. Please amend the seeding mixture to include Ladino Clover at the rate of S lbs/acre.
Please delete Virginia Pines from the revegetation plans.
Two copies of updated mine maps are attached.
We trust this material will be sufficient for your review and approval.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC/Imm
Attachment
cc: H. S. Willson

z/,P192
i
Ji42%1992
LAND QtIALtT{'sECi:(}N
iLA&ati a xdd ono �3vti
4 = CSA
G = O, 30 (unodacl, �taaacd�
(25-Va-A, 5-A uncuk� c%cnaZi&v)*
A- Sac
Q . 62. 5 c4,V
Q> C.=a
C = o. 30
I = 7. z ,4,/ AIv
A= 2.5ac�
Q = 5.4 c4.y
Q = CLA
A Z.oac
Q= 4.44&

Diversion Ditch Design for Martin Marietta
Reidsville quarry
Diversions at Addition to Existing Berm
Parameters:
Discharge
6.5 cfs 25-yr storm
Side Slope
2 : 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
0
Longitudinal Slope
1 %
Mannings n
0.035 grass lining
Analysis:
Depth
1.11 feet
Area
2.5 ft'ft
Perimeter
5.0 ft
Velocity
2.7 fps
Flow
6.6 cfs
Top Width
4.4 ft
Diversion North of Proposed Berm
Parameters:
Discharge
5.4 cfs 25-yr storm
Side Slope
2 : 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
0
Longitudinal Slope
1 %
Mannings n
0.035 grass lining
Analysts
Depth
1.03 feet
Area
2.1 ft•ft
Perimeter
4.6 ft
Velocity
2.5 fps
Flow
5.4 cfs
Top Width
4.1 ft
Diversion South of Proposed Berm
Parameters:
Discharge
4.4 cfs 25-yr storm
Side Slope
2 : 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
0
Longitudinal Slope
1
Mannings n
0.035 grass llnfng
Analysts:
Depth
0.96 feet
Area
1.8 fl•ft
Perimeter
4.3 ft
Velocity
2.4 fps
Flow
4.5 cfs
Top Width
3.8 ft

zl(elaz
-Raid.a.t,Rte. quanu.�
.,�rd.uv�amt. `fixw:,ri, �ea��-K, C,aR.cupa,G.m�a�
16.hlo -69- y at Odd, Uir i �es.rn�
�A,p.�IAhIAP.CQi O.n.ea, = 3 ate.
V9 e (1000 �(����C 3
ri.&omw. J O' L x 36 W e 3 D C ✓'mE = 5400 ,..�1')
(ra4e, Pcf J wed is A.F .team Z OtIYLu J
bpA ePwa Mao Lug.. #�' cL u_ = f
pa °b a5-T-a� .
wtu, Q uftt�ift,: Q = CW
Q ` (o
CW- 30
Q z 2
riWH3/z 3(f) /Z

`MnaoIxz , Ttb, agrg z/�elaz
�kAa.dlh� Q uww�.
.'11/ltn itOhii-7:.1ln/M�> Q� �(.�flii42�`�19�rxi �Q� u.tu�/dCllK+iw'W�. B� �MMK/)
V&&L#m-. = (/eoo�Y3/0'c')Cz5crc) = 450043
6C),Lx 5D,w 43,D (Va. = 5400-p3
(Y ot� flit Ikea+ a Opt Qeaa� 2x tU.OLt j
4s:2Lwa ° !
I.Utt. L, lA.tt O"ll.: O � cu)L -1 j12
0= 5.4c�a
Gw=3.0
l�.Lb
! _ -CL - `5. 4
Cwg-vz - 6J61pz

ma nc�v 04TW ate- 2/rB(vz
,�eduriE,* �w.i��u cnecu¢axw��.a�
At/i� OUT �n % � pi-,J!/t�-({:�y�i) ( Ott 6t4 /j� ( /6 -A }AXl)
anza) = 2 ach.ea/
VmEumie = (iecb.e6IOCne)(.ZaC U)= 36900 3
4 4P5- thew✓ ,JFWYO..
WtLA> .equgjaCX�: Q= CwL W
q = o SA
C= 0.55 (C&a,j Ott t ggie)
I' 7.2 -Aji./4u� (d-Wwtis
A- 2.oa�
Q=4.4c.d)
Cw = 3.0 (iowadc Aaed.. uW )
H = I J?-
L = 0
Cw N 3/L
3�2
U-0z axis len�iA.q (o 4Qo+. �/rl"Wwhu
"�°'W d ✓an:Q.e '1'�-a-�it.e¢cf. I .�ooE.

`-mahz�:v`�.t:pzaa 4�ega�a. ,2J�a/ea.
�udauz@.C¢. Q
. rhaan-,vCant�s.(Za.iiy..,Ca.¢[..u,fatran.a�
¢quwcC "L`mPu.ine= /000 .V3/acna1
9c¢Gt nLvd ovw = 2 OZAZP )
Vm Cu rna (1 sm 4 3
3/ac�)Cza.�) - boa
to : 50' L r 25' W V. S 'D ( Vd. = 3756 �)
4ha'm.t m wM. Q= Z. 5 C440
Dgp;b 1.,5
"M 9 O&Mpa tidL Lt a AaAdk� . ` Tla,a4i '.J) n = D. 025
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor September 18, 1992 Charles H. Gardner, P.G., RE..
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director and State Geolo&nst
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622
Re: Reidsville Quarry Renewal Request
Mining Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
The review has been completed on. the additional information
submitted for the renewal of the mining permit for the Reidsville
Quarry in Rockingham County. The following information is needed
to complete our review:
I} As indicated in my letter to you dated February 7, 1992,
this office is concerned with the stability of the
channel between the proposed 10 year pit limit and the
berm along the northeastern property line. The Erosion
and Sediment Control Manning and Design Manual shear
stress analysis is limited to roadside_ ditches and is not
valid for large open channel flow. Therefore, this
analysis is not valid for the size channel proposed.
Please provide calculations indicating that the channel
will be stable in the 25 year storm.
2) All monitoring wells must be within the permitted
boundaries. The monitoring well on the Elmer King
property must be relocated into the permit boundaries.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT OUR REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL
ALL OF THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED.
In order to complete the processing of your renewal request,
please forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my
attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
GeoloiriCal Survcy Scuion land Quality section Geodetic survey section
(919) 733.2-123 [phone] [phone]
P.O. RON 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oppnrumity Affirmative Action Finplowr

•
•
Page 2
September 18, 1992
Please advise at (91.9)
questions on the above.
BUC\
733-4574 if you should have
Si r ly,
Bet U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
cc:. Doug Miller.
Russell Briggs, William Daniels & Assoc.
any

TO A A _
I
ROM 0 SPEED AT ERD�
tl7
Z�C[QA�xI�(i%KG.N
REPLY
(cTarU
SENDER OEIACN AND MAIN VELD W CAW, SEND WNIDE MD PINK COPIES

� 1 t

FROM 1 yr—
TE
REPLY
TDATE
o �/; SPEED VyTTER®
rmq+nwow�swrJw RECIPIENT. RETAIN WHITE COPY. RETURN PINK CQ%PVA¢ TURN OVER FOR USE WITH WINDOW ENVLLOPL

TO RETURN IN A WINDOW ENVELOPE,
PLEASE FILL IN NAME AND ADDRESS HERE AND
FOLD AS SHOWN WITH THIS SIDE FACING WINDOW.

L
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON--SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
August 25, 1992
K._ R X-A Rai -N -A-U H
TO: Beth Chesson
FROM: Doug Miller 0111-/
RE: Reidsville Quarry Renewal
MMA Permit 79-06
Rockingham County
AUG 2 7 1992
LAND QUALITY SEC i � ON
Review of the plans for the referenced quarry continues to
find significant discrepancies in the plan which makes it
unacceptable.
(1) The temporary diversions along the proposed berm
southeast of the present pit have not been designed
correctly.
(a) Calculations indicate 1% grade when sections of
the existing grade are steeper than that. Design
should be for worst condition.
(b) The division along the property line would need
to run up hill or involve significant cut to be
constructed as shown.
(c) The division on the northeast side does not
outlet into any sediment control device
(2) How can an undisturbed buffer be disturbed (see note
on top sheet)?

0

-2-
(3) Calculations refer to sediment basin at addition to
existing berm - which is it? If it is the large basin
at the end of the channel, it needs to be designed for
total drainage area contributing and not just the
disturbed area.
(4) Diversion ditches in cleared pit are again not
designed for the lay of the land. It would appear
that they picked numbers that work, not what exists.
(5) It would seem that most of our comments from our
January 10, 1992 memo still apply as do your comments
in your letter of February 7, 1992 to MMA. This is
not permitable as is presently presented.
If this office can provide further assistance, please
contact this office.
GDM/dh

11

4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin. Governor February 7, 1992 Claries H. Cardner
William W. Cobey, Jr.. Secretary Ditector
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Sox 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622'
Re: Reidsville Quarry Renewal Request
Mining Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
The initial review has been completed on your renewal
request for the mining permit for the Reidsville Quarry in
Rockingham County. The following additional information is
needed to complete our review:
1) Additional sediment and erosion control information is
needed for the construction of the proposed berms. It
appears that some of..the temporary diversion ditches
are outletting into areas that do not have sediment and
erosion control measures proposed. 'All diversion
ditches must outlet into a sediment control measure
until final stabilization of the diversion has been
accomplished. Design computations for the diversions
and sediment basins must be offered. Diversions and
basin spillways must be designed for the 10 year storm
if they are to remain in place and functioning for one
year or less. If they are to function for more than
one year, they must be designed based upon.the 25 year
storm event. Also, silt fencing is an unacceptable
sediment control in areas of concentrated flow such as
creeks. Please provide some other sediment control'for
the creek below the existing sediment basin and rock
check dam. Is there any disturbance below the outlet
of the existing sediment basin?, Furthermore, the
design of the permanent diversion channel is # F
questionable. This section checked the design and
-found that the channels may be too steep to be stable
even with rip rap. Please reevaluate the channel
design, focussing on reducing the depth of flow and the
channel gradient. Also, what do the dashed lines with
'ri-'s" and "F's" mean? For•clarification, please
provide a cross -sectional detail of the channel that
shows its position relative to the pit wali and the
berm.
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh. RC. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AFimnative Action Employer

2) Please provide this office with a ground water
monitoring program. Attached are the recommendations
from the Ground Water Section of DEM with this
Department. This office would accept a monitoring
program such as the one recommended by Ground Water.
3) Please locate the nearest off -•site dwelling on the mine
map.
4) The NC Wildlife Resources Commission reviewed this
renewal request and had -some recommendations concerning
the revegetation-plan. Attached is a copy of their
comments. Please incorporate their comments into your
revegetation plan.
PLEASE BE REMINDED THAT OUR REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL
ALL OF THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED_
In order to complete the processing of your renewal request,
please forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my
attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Please -advise at [phone] if you should have any
questions on the above.
Si,,ncerely,
.Be U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
BUC\
Attachments: Ground Water's comments dated January 22, 1992
NCWRC's comments dated January 24, 1992
cc: Doug Miller (without the attachments)
�" eA '�

r ' `,

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
IV.MV �r k0 lu
To: Beth Chesson
Assistant Mining specialist
Land Quality Section
FROM: Dennis Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request Martin Marietta Aggs.
Reidsville Quarry
Mining Permit No. 79-06 -
Rockingham County, North Carolina
The subject document was reviewed by biologists on our staff
and a site visit was made to the Reidsville Quarry on January 17,
1992 for the purpose of assessing mining impacts of granite on
fish and wildlife resources on the site. Our comments are
provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Mining Act
of 1971 as amended.
Martin Marietta proposes to expand the open pit area of
their granite mine operation in order to reach more mineable
material. The proposed expansion will involve the removal of
surface vegetation and soils, but will not prove detrimental to
wildlife species currently utilizing the area. Mining buffer
areas, including haul road borders, sediment basin edges and
erosion controlling berms are well vegetated and provide some
habitat for white-tailed deer, fox, rabbits and songbirds.
Raptors are also likely to use the area for foraging. Virginia
Pine was well established on the site, and was encroaching (due
to land disturbance) into areas formerly dominated by hardwood
species.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
does not object to the issuing of a mining permit renewal for
Martin Marietta Aggregates Reidsville Quarry, but does offer the
following recommendations:

r1
1) The seeding mixture submitted as part of the
revegetation plan should be amended to include Ladino or White
clover. This seed can be incorporated into the mix and planted
successfully at the rate of 5 lbs/acre. The seed should be sown
from August 25 to September 15 or from March 1 to 31.
2) Due to the extensive and invasive stands of Virginia
Pine observed on this site, NCWRC recommends that this species be
dropped from the revegetation plan. Given the Virginia Pine seed
source located on this site, any land disturbing activity will
result in their sprouting. An alternative species which offers
wildlife some food and cover and is likely to perform well on the
observed poor soils is red -cedar (Juniperus virginiana). We
recommend that this species be considered for revegetation
efforts.
Lastly, NCWRC is greatly interested in working with the
mining community to examine and evaluate the success of different
reclamation and revegetation efforts. Ms. Carole Cameron,
Landscape Specialist with Martin Marietta has indicated a desire
to work with NCWRC on different reclamation efforts (eq.,
hardwood plantings, erosion control seeding mixes). We applaud
her enthusiasm and would urge Martin Marietta to continue and
expand on their cooperative efforts with this Agency.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
project. If we can be of further assistance please advise.
cc: Stephen Pozzanghera, Habitat Conservation Biologist
Mr. Ken Roberts Reidsville Quarry Mine Manager

filly
SFc�;
0
N I N E B I T E R E V I E W
ROUTING TO DEN
ry��p
Project Name IIIIY �patioV-cf!XEI��.cU -
Referred to Larry Coble
Date a
Return to Land Quality by Ila egI2,
i
Air Quality Comments
Due
Completed
Comments attached U�
Ground Water Comments
Due
Completed
Comments Attached
Water Quality Attached Sheet.
..._... _.___....._...._4,
. .. _.,.,�.

0 •
January 17,1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Ward
THROUGH: Steve Mauney "Q,
FROM: Ron Linville
Subject: MMA-Reidsville Quarry
Permit # 79-06
Permit Renewal Request
Rockingham County
WSRO-Wg has no comment to make at this time concerning the
renewal of this permit. The company does have an NPDES Permit
which is active and which is in compliance with permit iimits.P
cc: WSRO
Central Files

MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME:
Due: I' 2 11 1 Assigned to: ICComple'ted
Approved by Larry Coble
Steve Mauney
REVIEW ISSUES•
Watershed/Stream Name and Classification_ c(%G•'-/lts� L.-.(x 6,41 R(I
Comments (j�
PERMITS:
NPDES Permit required
Yes No
NPDES Permit<Yiist'AnglProposed No. v C. 0 a o 0
Non Discharge Permit Required V
Yes No
Non Discharge Permit Existing/Proposed No.
Comments
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Wetlands Disturbed by Activity
Yes No
401 Certification Required _/
Yes No
Comments

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
WinstOTI-Salem Re&, anal Office
James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary AIR QUALITY COMMENTS Regional Mana�n:r
MINE SITE REVIEW
PROJECT NAME MARTIN 1ARIETTA REIDSVILLE QUARRY
COMPLETED BY BETH BURTON
DATE JANUARY 21, 1992
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS SUBPART 000
PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD)
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 2D SECTIONS .0400, .0510, .0516, .0521,
.0524, .0530
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
A MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING AIR PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE SOURCE
IF EMISSIONS INCREASE ABOVE THOSE ALLOWED IN THE CURRENT PERMIT.
APPLICATIONS FOR ANY NEW EQUIPMENT INSTALLED WHICH EMITS AIR POLLUTANTS
MUST BE MADE. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS MUST BE
DEMONSTRATED.
80?5 North Reim liouliw.ir i, 411itr I( 1, 1k' insnrn•1ala:m, 1�'( )711k 3i(13 • liacphunr Yt]>7 I Z3+{�r (,illy) H - m
(919) 896-7T1Q5 FAX
An Erµwi (_),>L,runtin• Aturma:i%t' Ar.:i,o Ernt'lover

• 1 Y � r SFATt „
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
Margaret Plemmons Foster
Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
TO: Mr. Douglas Miller
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
FROM: Janet M. Russell
Groundwater Section
SUBJECT: REIDSVILLE QUARRY/79-06
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Rockingham County
DATE: January 22, 1992
Groundwater Section staff have reviewed the package
submitted for the renewal of Martin Marietta's Reidsville
Quarry. We recommend that two groundwater monitoring wells
be installed to monitor groundwater level fluctuation. One
well should be installed hydraulically upgradient of the pit
excavation and the second well should be located
hydraulically downgradient of the pit excavation. water
levels should be obtained twice a year and the results
reported to the Winston-Salem Regional Office for tracking.
Thank you for giving us an opportunity to comment_
W25 1Nthill )flint l;r+ulevmd, Suite 101, Wi iigon-S,ilcm. N(, �711kr 3703 • T(:lephone 9N'kN'i3'Y.N-X2-
An i=(1ua1 (. pi,oiit1 61v AHit HIXTVII Al;li II l:m� l :vcr
W6-7007
FAX

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONM r p
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES +�1 VJ��.
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
LAnD QUo,LliY SECri^,
January 10, 1992
M E M O R A N D UM
TO: Beth U. Chesson
Assistant Mining Specialist
FROM: David H. ward ,Q0
Assistant Regional Engineer
THROUGH: G. Douglas Miller, P.E
Regional Engineer
SUBJECT: MMA Renewal Request
Reidsville Quarry, Permit #79-06
Rockingham County
We have received the subject request and have completed our
review of same. Our comments concerning this matter are as
follows:
APPLICATION
1. Page 5,4.a.& b.: A specific buffer is not shown of the map
along NC 65-87 and NCSR 1998. The nearest offsite
structures are not located on the map. Does traffic need to
be stopped on NC 65-87 and/or NCSR 19987
2. Page 7,9.: Again, the nearest offsite structure is not
located on the plan.
�3. Page 10, 3: A fence around the property boundary is not
adequate high wall protection. This is all that is shown on
the plan.
✓4. Page 13: Is the person who signed the reclamation plan a
licensed landscape architect?
5. Page 8, 10.b: Need to locate/label existing and proposed
well onsite/offsite. (Need to provide our standard inquiry
about well here.)

- 2 -
MAPS
6. Design computations are needed for all measures. Theme
computations submitted for a drainage channel:do.not
indicate the location of this channel on thd' 'mAp. �' 'No
computations were submitted for basins.
LAND QU AE ITY SEC T i0
7. Berms are indicated to be + 30' tall. A means of getting
runoff off berms is needed.
8. How much capacity is available for sediment storage in the
"Existing sedimentation basin"? Is it adequate for the
proposed modifications? Will the COE be involved in this
work?
9. A silt fence is not adequate below the "Existing
sedimentation basin" across the stream. Exactly what
modifications is to be made below the basin outlet down to
the property line?
10. More detailed information is necessary before future berm
located on "insert" map is constructed. Items needed would
include a 50' undisturbed buffer which is not provided.
11. Channel design indicates steep gradients which will be
unstable according to tractive force procedures in sediment
manuals.
If we can be of additional assistance, do not hesitate to contact
us.
DHW/GDM/dh

0
December 20, 1991
To: Doug Miller
From: Beth ChessonlJ.1
Re: MMA Renewal Request for the Reidsville Quarry, 79-06
Rockingham County
Attached is your renewal package for theis project. Please review,
route through DEM for comments, and forward your written comments
by January 18, 1992.
Thanks!

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
DMsion of land Resources
James G. Martin. Governor Charles H. Gardner
William W. Cobey, Jr.. Secretary December 20 , . 1991 Director
Memorand
To: Fred Harrisf
Director, Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries?
Wildlife Resources Commission/ -
Attention: Habitat Conservation Progras
From: Beth Chesson a.�W'
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Re: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Martin Marietta Aggregates
Reidsville Quarry
Mining Permit No. 79-06
Rockingham County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal
request for the above referenced project. Martin Marietta is requesting
renewal of 182 acres off a tributary to Wolf Island Creek.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries
(G. S. 74-51 (2)). Please 'respond by January 21, 1992 so that we may
complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals
and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and
sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain
erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be
greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site
inspection, it is recommended that they contact Mr, Ken Roberts at
[phone] to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy
of your comments to the person noted in the application.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
greatly appreciated.
BUC\ REQIFIbEN
attachments
cc: Doug Miller DEC 31 )yyi
HABITAT COtISEnvnr.ao --
P.O. Box 27687 a Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal OpporunityAR nnudw Action Employer

v

•
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
December 18, 1991
Mr. Tracy E. Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Subject:
Mine Permit Renewal
Reidsville Quarry
Permit � .79- )
Dear Mr. Davis: �1�
P o_ Box 30013
RALEnH, N.C. 27622-0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
We are requesting the renewal of our mining permit #79-6 which expires on May 18, 1992,
Attached for your review are duplicate copies of the following materials:
Application for a mining permit
Mine map and erosion control inserts
Calculations and details
Reclamation map
Also included is our check #99-015582 in the amount of $500.00 to cover the renewal fee.
Air and water discharge permits which are valid for a five year period, will be renewed prior
to their expiration dates.
We trust that the enclosed material is sufficient for your review and approval. Please give
Horace Willson or me a call if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC/cb

I
-10

•
WOMarietAggregates
f12'cldsville Quarry 4h
alc Parameters
Compu[etion of Swale
Parameters:
_
Discharge
250 cis
Side Slope
2.: 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
7 96
Mannings n
0.053
Analysis:
'
Depth
1.92 feet
Area
20.6 R•R
Perimeter
18.6 R
Velocity
9.4 fps
rlow
250.8 cis
Top Width
17.7
Computation of Swale Parameters
'
Parameters:
Discharge
Side Slope
Slde Slope (2)
Bottom Width
Longitudinal Slope
Mannings n .
Analysis.
Depth
Area
Perimeter
Velocity
Flow
Top Width
360 cis
2 : 1
2 :1
10
7%
0.053
2.34 feet
34.4 Raft
20.5 R
10.5 fps
360.9 cis
19.4
10-yr sionn
Rip rap
100-yr storm
Rip rap
a

Comput tlen ofB9w�alelpa�metern
.'Discharge
250 cfs
` Sld Slope -:
2 : 1
- -Side Slope:(2)
2.1
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
0.5 %
Manningsn
0,053
Analysis:
Dreg
3,86 feet
68.4 A'¢
Perimeter
27.3 ft
Velocity
3.7 fps
Flow
251.1 cfs
Top Width
2564
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters:
Discharge
360 cis
Side Slope
2.: 1 .
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
0.5 %
. Mannings n
0.053
Analysts:
'Depth
4.63 feet
Area
-
69.2 frR
pervelotftdy r
3017 ft
try
4.0 fps
Flow
360.8 cfs
- Top Width
28.5
10-yr storm
Rip rap
100-yr storm
Rip rap
s

0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESL'
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) SF
4O
k
1. Name of Mine Reidsville Quarry County _ Rockingham
2. Name of Applicant Martin Marietta Aggregates
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail P. O. Box 30013, Raleigh, NC 27622
*Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address Route 7, Box 30, Reidsville, NC 27320
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Ken Roberts
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
"Signature
Print Name_ Stephen P. Zelnak, Jr. '
Title President
Date /ZZZ&
* The Land Quality Section should be notified of change in permanent address or telephone number.
** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days
of receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing
and the filing of any supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be
addressed and all required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach
additional sheets as needed.

•
•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MINE
1. Total acreage at site covered by this permit application:
Acres owned 20 Acres leased 162
Property owner if leased King, Hudson, McMicha
2. Name of all materials mined: Granite
3. Minim method: Hydraulic Dredge _ _ Underground Shovel & Truck X
Draghne & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain) Front end loaders
may be used in place of shovels
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 350 Reference elevation:
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 200
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No If no, proceed to
Question 6.
a. Acreage of previouslyaffected land(s) at present site that has not been reclaimed:
77 acres (identifall areas on your mine map).
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted? Martin Marietta Aggregates
C. Acreage of previously attectea Jana at present site that nas been reclaimed: iz.J acres
(identify all areas on your mine map).
d. When and by whom was this activity conducted? Martin Marietta Aggregates
e. Do you wish to exclude any areas noted in 5a or c from this permit application?
Yes No X . If yes, how much? acres (identify all areas on your mine map).
6. Present (pre -mining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 45 acres Pasture 46 acres Forestry 91 acres Fish/Wildlife acres
Recreation acres Other acres (Farm Buldings)
7. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed (estimate acreage for
each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry 112 acres Fish/Wildlife 70 acres
Recreation acres Other acres
B. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
1. Number of years for which permit is requested (10 years maximum). 10
2. Total affected acreage to be disturbed during initial year of operation:
a.
b.
Area used for tailing ponds (pit clarification, sed. basin)
Area for (included in 2d)
13
17
acres
used stockpiles
acres
c.
Area used for waste piles (berms)
12.5
acres
d.
Area used for processing plants and on -site haul roads
15
acres
e.
Area of mine excavation(s)
32
acres
f.
TOTAL a-e
89.5
acres
3. Estimate the maximum amount of land to be disturbed and unreclaimed at any one time during
the life of the permit. 125 acres
-2-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Check acreage to be bonded*: Total affected acreage figure from 132f OR B3 (page 2)
whichever is larger, equals acreage to be bonded. (See 15 NCAC 5B.0003 for bond amounts.)
0 - 4.99 acres 10 - 24.99 acres
5 - 9.99 acres X 25 + acres
5. a. Will you file a blanket bond or other security covering all of your mining operations in
North Carolina? Yes No
b. Have you already filed a blanket bond or other security? Yes X No
6. List any mining permits previously issued to the applicant. Martin Marietta Aggregates
currentl holds 44 mining -permits in North Carolina
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other
waste water handling? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe all such processes
including any chemicals to be used.
Process wash water is handled in a recycling system.
b. Will the operation involve dewatering the mine or discharging fresh or wastewater from the
mine or plant. Yes X No . If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge and
locate all proposed discharge points on your mine map.
The mine discharge is made up of stormwater that collects in the pit area. Most of this
water falls directly into the pit; the remainder comes from area drainage and some ground-
water seepage. All of these waters flow into a pit sump for clarification. This water is then
pumped out of the pit as required. The discharge is covered by an NPDES permit which
requires sampling.
c. If you answered yes to either la or lb, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained a water quality permit from the Division of Environmental Management, Water
Quality Section.
This discharge is covered by NDPES permit #NC0000957.
* In lieu of the surety bond required by this section, the operator may file with the Department a cash
deposit, negotiable securities, a mortgage of real property acceptable to the Department, or an
assignment of a savings account in a North Carolina bank on an assignment form prescribed by the
Department. The amount of land disturbed and unreclaimed at any one time must not exceed the
bonded amount.
-3-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. a. Will the operation involve crushing or an other air contaminant emissions?
Yes X No . If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or have obtained
an air quality permit issued by the Division of Environmental Management, Air Quality
Section or local governing body.
This operation is covered by air permit #4133R5.
b. How will fugitive dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Fugitive dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc. will be controlled through use of a wet sup-
pression system within the operating plant, a large water pumper truck will be used to
control dust on haul roads and in the stockpile area. Much of the production will be washed
stone which generates no dust.
3. Describe in detail the chronological sequence of land disturbing activities and reference the
sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
A chronological sequence of land disturbing activities is provided on the mine map. Any
changes in this sequence will be submitted to the Division of Land Resources for approval.
-4-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any adjoining
property or highway right-of-way? Show all buffers on mine map(s).
Buffers between the mining operation and adjacent properties will be sufficient to provide
adequate screening consisting of trees, existing topoggraphy and earthen berms. Buffers are
shown on the attached mine map dated April 9, 141.
b. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any
neighboring dwelling house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any
mine excavation. Locate all such structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of
any proposed excavation.
The mine excavation will not extend close enough to the property boundaries to cause any
physical damage. AN quarry shots are designed to prevent excessive vibrations. Seis-
mograph recordings are made when deemed necessary. The quarry shots are scheduled
normally about mid -day and will be observed by our neighbors as distant thunder lasting less
than a second. This minor event normally occurs one to three times a week, depending
upon production requirements. The structures are on the mine map.
-5-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. Describe specific erosion control measures to be taken during mining to prevent offsite
sedimentation (include specific plans for erosion control for mine excavation(s), waste piles,
access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of installation. Locate and
label all erosion and sediment control measures on the mine map. Engineering designs and
calculations shall be required when needed to justify the adequacy of any proposed measures.
Location of erosion control structures are included on the mine map.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining properties
during mining.
The mine excavation will not extend close enough to the property boundaries to cause any
landslides or slope instability.
b. In excavations of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping.
Final excavation slopes of unconsolidated materials will be 2:1. Where the height of a cut
face warrants, a bench will be cut to slope toward the face of cut and draining to the pit
excavation.
c. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet.
Bench widths vary from 20' - 100'. The average height is 40'.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
7. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes No X . If yes, list all such minerals,
their relative abundance and indicate their location(s) on the mine map. How will acid water
pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
8. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation
from public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building
berms or other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map and
provide cross -sections through all proposed berms.
Existing trees, terrain, and berms will effectively screen our operations from nearby roads or
homes. Trees and vegetation will be planted on the berms and in such areas as will promote
future long-term screening and soil stability.
9. Will explosives be used? Yes X No . If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and
describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring
property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations. Locate the nearest offsite
structure(s) to the proposed excavation(s) on the mine map.
Explosives will be utilized to extract the rock from the earth. The principal explosive material
is ammonium nitrate, commonly used as fertilizer.
A shot pattern is used that minimizes the air and ground vibrations and provides the best rock
breakage. Energy expended in excessair blast or ground vibration is wasted energy and it is our
intent to develop the most efficient blasting procedures possible.
Shots will normally occur from one to three times a week and will be observed as distant
thunder lasting less than a second.
Permanent records are maintained on each shot which indicate the shot pattern, loading, delays,
time, weather and all other pertinent data.
-7-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
10. a. What is the pre -mining depth (in feet) to the seasonal high and low ground water tables?
High 40 ft. Low 60 ft. What is the source of this information?
According to observations in the pit.
b. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
Yes X No If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X
No . If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells?
Locate all existing wells on the mine map that lie within 500 feet of the proposed permit
area. Provide data to support any conclusions or statements made.
The close proximity of the rock to the surface of the ground and the low level of
permeability of the rock in the quarry area indicate that quarry development will have no
detrimental impact on any wells in the area. Experience over the years has shown that wells
bordering many granite pit excavations have not been impacted.
11. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No
If yes, describe these materials and how they will be stored and show the locations) of all
storage facilities on the mine map.
Fuel oil, waste oil and gasoline are stored inside an approved containment structure that meets
all required fire protection codes. Solvents are handled by an approved dealer such as Safety
Kleen Corp.
5:2

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and
indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This information must be
illustrated on a reclamation map.
Disturbed areas, berms, etc., will be revegetated in accordance with the seeding schedule as
provided. The excavation itself will be allowed to fill with groundwater and could be utilized
£or water storage, recreation, wildlife sanctuary or other uses.
2. a. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation?
Yes X No . If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the
reclamation map and provide a scaled cross-section(s) through the proposed body(s) of
water. Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish?Yes No X . If yes, specify
species.
The pit and supply lake will remain as permanent water storage use. The average depth of
water in the pit will be determined by the ultimate depth of the pit at the time operations
are terminated. The average depth of the supply lake will be approximately 12 feet.
The stocking of fish will be left to the discretion of the landowner.
b. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting or remaining
in mined areas. Provide details on any permanent water outlets.
Pit water is constantly "rolling over" due to temperature inversions between water layers.
In

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adajoining property in all completed excavations
in rock including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. The location of the barricade
must be shown on the reclamation map.
A perimeter fence will be placed around all excavations upon completion of the mining
operation.
4. a. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such
on -site mine waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping.
Overburden will be utilized to construct screening berms. The berms will be vegetated and
placed as reclaimed areas as soon as reclamation is completed.
Overburden piles, refuse, spoil banks, or other mine waste areas existing at final reclamation
will be graded and compacted to slopes of 2:1 or flatter and will be vegetated in accord with
the attached seeding schedule. The areas will be graded to prevent pooling and stagnation
of water and to control storm water runoff. Old or existing overburden piles that are
adequately stabilized and vegetated will remain in their current configuration.
b. Are any processing waste, overburden or other such mine wastes to be disposed of off. -site?
Yes X No . if yes, describe in detail what these wastes are and how they will be
disposed. Attach a separate site map(s) showing the location(s) of the disposal area(s).
Include all specifications for erosion an sediment control.
Overburden material not needed for berm construction will be available as fill material for
nearby construction activities. A considerable amount of overburden material has been used
in this manner at many of our locations.
-10-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
The plant and stockpiles will be removed from the site. The plant and stockpile area will
be graded, scarified and revegetated in accord with the attached schedule. Further, on -site
roadways not needed for future development of the site will also be graded, scarified and
revegetated.
Erosion control structures necessary to final reclamation will be cleaned out and placed in
good working order.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No If yes,
identify these on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent ditch line
stabilization.
The main haul road and service roads will remain for vehicular access to the lake formed
by the pit. These roads shall be stabilized while the quarry is active. The roads and their
need for maintenance will be determined by the future use of the site after the operation
has ceased.
6. State the method of reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins.
The sediment control basin and the settling ponds will be drained, filled, graded and revegetated
in accordance with the final reclamation plan as approved by the Division of Land Resources.
-11-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
7. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables,
or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971).
No off -site generated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written approval
from the NC Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Land Quality
Section and either the NC Department of Human Resources or local governing body.
Items such as drill steel, conveyor belting, screen cloth, cable, etc., will be covered by landfill.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a
condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. Give design details including typical
cross -sections of any permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan.
Show the location(s) of all permanent channels on the reclamation map.
Periodic overflow of pit will flow through existing vegetation prior to entering any adjacent
waterway.
-12-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
9. Describe your plan for reve�etation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This Plan
must include recommendations for time of seeding and the amount and type of seed, fertilizer,
lime and mulch per acre and general seedin& instructions for permanent revegetation and, if
necessary, temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing pine seedlings only is not acceptable.
NOTE: Revegetation Plan must be approved and signed by one of the following:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District having
jurisdiction over lands in question;
b. Authorized representatives of the Office of Forest Resources, Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development;
c. County Agricultural Extension chairmen or Research and Extension personnel
headquartered at North Carolina State University in the School of Agriculture and Life
Sciences;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Office of Forest Resources, Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development;
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION:
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION:
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE OF APPLICATION INCLUDING SEEDING SCHEDULE:
PLANTING DATES SEED MIX
March 1 - June 1 Sericea lespedeza (scarified)
KY-31 Fescue
Weeping Lovegrass
June 1 - September 1 KY-31 Fescue
Sorghum - Sudan hybrids
RATES - LBS. ACRE
50
1.20
5
120
50
September 1 - March 1 Sericea lespedeza 70
(unhulled - unscari£ied)
KY-31 Fescue 120
Abruzzi rye 25
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION:
Clean straw or hay cr 2 tons/acre
TACK with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 square foot, or other tacking agent
approved by Owner.
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS:
Virginia or Loblolly pines will be planted as needed to improve area screening.
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature,. �� �4 _ Date \ 'z j \ f 01
Title Landscape Specialist
Agency Environmental Services
-13-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
1.0. Provide a schedule of reclamation that indicates the sequence of reclamation and approximate
time frame. If reclamation is to be accomplished concurrently with mining, then show on the
site map segments that are to be mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit. Add
drawings showing typical sections or cross -sections and layout of proposed reclamation.
During reclamation, precautions will be taken to assure that the reclamation work is not
detrimental to animal or fish life. Erosion control and revegetation will be done in an expedient
manner and in accordance with the then approved final reclamation plan.
The settling cells will be drained, graded to ground level and revegetated.
E. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
1. The "Notice" form or a facsimile thereof attached to this application must be sent certified or
registered mail to all adjoining (contiguous) landowners indicated on mine map unless another
means of notice is approved in advance by the Director, Division of Land Resources.
The completed "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be submitted before
the application is considered complete.
-14-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
F. MAPS
1. Two copies of the county highway maps and two copies of all mine maps shall be submitted with
each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Clearly mark the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
2. Mine maps should be accurate drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged topographic maps of
the entire map area and of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly
illustrate the following.
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be
located including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
c. Outline of all pits/excavations.
d. Outline of stockpile areas.
e. Outline of temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
f. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location and
distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
g Location and name of streams and lakes.
h. Outline of settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
i. Location of planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
J Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
k. Location of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
1. 100 year floodplain limits.
m. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land.
n. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Date prepared
7. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales must, at a minimum, meet the following guidelines:
SITE SIZE (From Page 2, Al) MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT ITEMS 2a-n
BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
-15-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon
our lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections
or investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of this Act.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever
entries on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably
necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond
forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-54.
Signature's Aen P I &K,
Print Name: Stephen P. Zelnak. Jr.
Title: President
Mine: Reidsville Ouarry
Company: Martin Marietta_A�regates
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application for a permit.
Return two copies of the completed application and all maps to the appropriate Land Quality Section
Regional Office serving your area. (See attached list of. Regional Offices).
Inquiries regarding the status of an application should be directed to the address listed on the front page
of this application form.
-16-

E.L I T �-, .i• r ��i I. I' _�Y 1 T.. _I ,,. '/''1CF'J
uQ_�►'t-'-'•---`---" t ._..� _ i `_..........
�7 =r;: r._ _••f:��l� •I�C:�Q.� Eas
rid :.� Ti
•r - E �' ' ; I -iA , ! i r � I
'• 'k'. ' -fir.._...: � i. r � F i 'I• ' ' ! „- �_ _ ` _ -• - '-_-
-'I ,._�i _—��•;_• __5 � ; j._- -/1 .! 1....—f� ..._—r-- —�_�. ..:,___�E _i._— � _•I�— •i-'-_,'' __I _`-'_ _ i _ - i--± _ 1- —_i _J• __' �I,• _
I "Y I� f� � P`Tf�•r l�Yl'
ff
,
C aye Q: ) '
3
z
1
- ! -�-1-
1
__.._ -----.--�-�-- _ - --- -�_..; .-_ --Oil a� j-....f - --f- - -- -.. __;_ ......._._ _._..___-_.. _.._...w _, .._.-•----- _..._---- -- -
i
_•L z .:I - i 3 --- t ' r t'-_ I.. _' E_ I 'j 'i= � � ' - ___ 1 .._._1_�J..._ '--_'-'�----.I.�..._.`--- r....,..----..... _.
sbo r Pia CO--
.i� f_-��' w� d c t;rc�.�'r or L:Ve s'_
. .Ys� s.ly' �; l��r -E i'r --r: ,S:`i _� ir'�:: `Y :F fa�5': i-"�"j''' I ��. ''ri_J �• i.l: �i � �+ir I •.I: 'i E � I �,
itJ.Y j��.¢r •1/-5- ;� /� :1 :; '� —�s i -•j, .j - I. i ; _�; .,�— ---i —,; - `'-��i' i '' 'i � i---E- � .
rf, s.`!!11]-�l✓�/:'l� I.� FW I— �• i .! I ' �• I ! I� .I�.;_i._...... i _ _ I I _ _ ._.
�-'k` s , , { � s 1 i t =_ I '�.��. f }� i . � I -• i I - •�•••-- I :i 1- - i.�i '— I . T � .-~ i -'
5D�'"�G
.r• /�----'•--e l'. -1 •1!� >� . � i ".� iy{;. • ! ;...` �,
:id t-» ��." jI 1 '' •! E�i- �• .:i• � f•_. .i,.., I..:.:t' ,-' .i 4 !.•. ��•'''•I-• -�•,: t•.•.•'1.' I• E. f• �-_-1_....
.� ".� _ -'� -:�.:� -_w_ ; _ ice- �•`.� � �......r ., ---f- - ,- � ��. ..�---=----__: -- �-={-----_...�._-..._..__ � __ j '._..;..._..__.__
• I I
;
:
711
UL
IIoLVE..t'9.- .�9e.�..-�Dr_---:.G.ha _ nil_:..-,--'•---���-+'�-s�_Gi.�.-'�-----,--a,-c�s.�_s.._.:-_.
:
. i
"��iY[S •i'-�}f s-•'•'•�,r -�- ., wk-:-`�_.�._l�-:r _1 •���: L.F S•• i. '�' ' 1 _i -1� I _.I �i I �I'-' .t _ .i•
1 �t,�•, _y1t;�. _. a, ._t' ei'.. :Y''� - - >r••'•, _- .=4--•_�•�- _^^_• �'^_:-��� - _ .r.1. =����� � -
KI
�W �E W^ sty. ::.i;il ir� N •t'} jy_"•.= ��li. A,J �' .SC •"- l'%' S±. F.�•: _i:^ T •'l•L�, ,.•.•e �i:t: :If' .I:': ..: i5i5-. Y:1 .. J.'-i .•' � � ' i ':
•'• idSG:F 6.jT� in^:'�i. saiA:W:r. �e��ril ::��"'�", �. - t. �•r 1:1:':''''j[� • `ti-t.;3.• . +� r MS T—i. F �, - M•� S: - I �.-'T . -
' - •��i.y�aT �, f_rt u`-kA 1 :f [-11.`. �4":.�. Y�i.i•� �.'�:.r�: �,. .I -•,I .i• f

Discharge
Side Slope
Side Slope (2)
Bottom Width
Longitudinal Slope
Manmings n
Analysis:
Depth
Area
Perimeter
Velocity
Flow
Top Width
Computation Of Swale Parameters .
Pdrameters:
Discharge
Side Slope
Side Slope (2)
Bottom Width
Longitudinal Slope
ManNngs n
Analysis:
Depth
Area
Perimeter -
Velocity
Flow
Top Width
250 cis
2:1
2 :1
10
17%
0.053 .i
1.5 feet
19.5 f *ft
16.7 it
12.8 fps
250.6 cis
10.0
360 eta
2:1
2 :1
10
17%
0.053
1.84 feet
25.2RYt'
18.2 it
14.4; fps
361.8 'cis
17.4
10-yr storm Of
Rip rap
52`n
160-yr storm
Rip rap

•
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Reidsville Quarry
Channel
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters:
Discharge
Side Slope
Side Slope (2)
Bottom, Width
Longitudinal Slope
Mannings n
Analysis:
Depth
Area
Perimeter
Velocity
Flow
Top Width
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters. -
Discharge
Side Slope
Side Slope (2)
Bottom Width
Longitudinal Slope
Mannings n
Analysts:
-Depth '
Area
Perimeter
Velocity
Flow
Top Width
[f J
250 cfs
10 yr storm DIfYnTJ
2 : 1
2:1
10
10 %�
0.053
Rip rap
I�7 feet
23.5 ft-ft
17.8 ft
10.7fps
250.8 cfs
/
17.0
360 cfs 100-yr storm
2 : 1
2 :1
10
10%
0.053 PJp rap
2.13 feet
30.4 ft*ft
19.5 ft
11.9 fps
362.5 cis
18.5
�F�rj�;"•"�.zs.:�'i�~•ter':,.. T ..: � '

Channel • r .. %`.
i 5
Computation of Swale Parameters
. Parameters:
M,i ;piDTl '�Z'
✓� !.Z(
Discharge
Side Slope
25
2:1
2: 1
10- storm
�n/
V
Side Slope
2:1
d
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
7 %
p
Mannings n
0.053
Rip rap
Analysis:
Depth
1.92 feet
Area
26.6 ft•ft
Perimeter
18.6 R
Velocity
9.4 fps
Flow
250.8 cis
Top Width
17.7
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters:
Discharge
360 cis
100-yr storm
Slde Slope
2: 1
Side Slope (2)
2 :1
Bottgm Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
7 %
Mannings n
0.053
Rip rap
Analysis:
Depth
2.34 feet
Area -
34.4 ft•R
Perimeter
20.5 p
Velocity
10.5 fps
Flow
360.9 cis
' Top Wldth
19.4

�i' crj vim: ;. uiscnarge
250 cis
10-yr storm
SH * Side Slope
J/..r„ Sid e$lopp l2) �'
2 : 1
2:1
BottomWldth
10
Lonjg Lrdinal Slope
0.5 %
Mannings n
0.033
Rip rap
Analysts:
Depth
3.86 feet
Area
68.4 R'ft
Perimeter
27.3 R
Velocity
3.7 fps
Flow
251.1 cfs
Top Width
25.4
Computation of Swale Parameters
Parameters:
Discharge
Side Slope
360 cfs
100- yr storm
Side. Slope (2)
2 : 1
2 :1
Bottom Width
10
Longitudinal Slope
0.6 %
Mannings n '.
0.053
Rip rap
- Ang1Bests:'
4.63 fee[
-Area
89.2 R'R
. - Perimeter
30.7 R
Velocity
4.0 fps
Flow:
360.8 cfs
Top Width
28.5
-

ROUTING SLIP
Simons
Gardner
Conrad
PLEASE SIGN AND COMMENT
mecca 4
10 W nl�� -

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
RENTAL
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G. S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971", Mining Permitting Regulation 15
N.C.A.C. 5B,.and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
0
Permission is hereby granted to:
MARTIN MARIETTA ACGREGATES , permittee
for the operation of a Cruolied Stone Quarry
entitled, REIDSVILLE QUARRY , permit no. 79-6
and located in Rockingham
County, which shall provide
that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands
and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

2 4f 6
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, here-
inafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved Recla-
mation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclmation Phan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise,the
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that
the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with
reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and con-
ditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and requirements
of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written notice of its
intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right
to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to
the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Tlafinirinnc
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-49.
r..nneii ri rims
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air quality,
surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by the Environmental
Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until May 18, 1992
and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46,
et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

3 of 6
1. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with
permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the Division of Environ-
mental Management.
2. Any mining process producing air contaminant emissions shall be subject to
the permitting requirements and regulations promulgated by the Division of
Environmental Management.
3. Sufficient buffer shall, be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural water-
course.
4. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent
surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to
the affected land.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetat:lve cover or other adequate erosion
control measure, structure or device. In any event, exposed slopes or
any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage
due to siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with ground
cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools
of water that are, or are likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary
structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or
installed when required to prevent such conditions.
1. The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrationst
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided,
the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of ground motion
shall not exceed one inch per second at the immediate location of any
building regularly occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or institutional
building.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 12B decibels linear (dBL)-
warning, 132 dBL caution, and 135 dBL maximum as measured at the
immediate location of any regularly occupied building such as any
dwelling house, church, school, public building, or commercial or
institutional building.

4 of 6
C. The aperaror shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that
flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily
or permanently guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond
the guarded area, it shall be reported to the Department immediately,
who will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause.
Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the permit.
D. Operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing:
the total number of holes; pattern of holes; depth of holes; total
pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of
stemming and burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall
be maintained at the per.mittee's mine office and copies shall be provided
to the Department upon request.
E. Operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a period
for which notice is requested.
8. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained 1;f-tween any excavation and any adjoining
property line to prevent caving of that property and to allow grading of the
sideslopes to the required angle.
9. A physical barrier consisting of a fence or boulder barriers, etc., shall
be maintained around the perimeter of any quarry highwall.
10. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the
mine and public throughfares whenever practical to screen the operati^n from
public view.
11. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
12. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of
$25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the quarry operation as
indicated on the approved application. This security must remain in force
for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the
bonded acreage.

5 of 6
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which
is a condition on the continuing validity of -that Mining Permit. Additionally,
the Reclamation Plan'is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues
beyond the term of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other uncon-
solidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility
of slides and be consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided
in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for
the proposed subsequent use of the lai,4.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined
area that are, or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic
and reforestation practices as established by the N.C. Agricultural
Experiment Station and the N.C. Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation
Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according
to the time schedule included in the plan, which shall to the extent
feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in
any event, initiation of reclamation at the earliest practicable time after
completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with ground water, barricade along
the top of any highwall, and grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated
material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for
the planned future use are as follows:
A. A physical barrier consisting of a fence or boulder barriers, etc., shall
be maintained around the perimeter of any quarry highwall.
B. Any cut or fill slopes in overburden or other unconsolidated material shall
be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical grade or flatter and terraced as
necessary to insure slope stability.

6of 6
C. The stockpile, office and process plant areas shall be graded and
smoothed.
D. Any settling ponds or sediment basins shall either be backfilled and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into lake areas.
E. No contaminants shall be dumped at the mine site. Scrap metal, trash
or other such waste shall be removed from the site and properly disposed.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
G. Any excavated, diverted, or disturbed natural channels shall be stabilized.
3. Revegetation Plan
A ground cover of grasses or legumes shall be established on affected areas
such as earth berms, dikes, dams, and abandoned stripped areas, processing
areas, and spoil piles, using Sericea lespedeza; Love grass, fescue, rye or
a combination of several of the above. Lime and fertilizer will be applied
as indicated by soil test results. Virginia or Loblolly pines will be planted
on affected areas along with the grasses and legumes. Nursery grown seedlings
will be planted at a spacing to yield approximately 1000 trees per acre.
As an alternative to the above revegetation plan, a revised plan consistent
with current technology may be submittedto the Department for approval.
4. Reclamation Schedule
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent
feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible
after completion or termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetatioq shall be completed within two
years of completion or termination of mining.
Permit issued this the /d� day of h'js...r , 19 owl- .
BY:��i...il 'C
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development.

N
w
J
_J
M
w
x
D-
Q
H
w
W
CL
O
w
4
W
F--
(10
O
D-
2
O
U
i

TO
SUBIFCi�p/H / Q
1"I `I-!v. //\..[l�/✓✓/P, k KPH U, {. l/XJ4 — /let✓ $ef(1f.
DATE/Z /
I'S - v,40Lt, g"/
"u/l�a'�!1�P(i�, G(Un O(tX 5�7 5/7Y^^.• _ l /^�a'�l �u-�- 4+(J,���dG Y/v GL/o�dp��F
�)i//�S�/rp
I/1n / n ! aQ)7 n6-Sae, 01" 6�is�'s. hw�I �c. Fv-,.�'•� %�Lex
iea a(5.
4v u sa. cc,
4v1 I /� I / (� _r�
l�� < o-y e • �(iyF(0,4C CQ D.� W e, ov' 1 p
/' �'�t�
L SIGNED [? IY.. S 0'c TLL e-, yw" P-�%S �F'Gt sc� tv &yl t Ste^
DATE
SIGNED I'
REREORM, 4S 469
PGLY PAK �9 SLiS) dP 00
SEND PARTS I AND R INTACT
Y _ PART 9-WILL BE RETURNED WITH XFPIY..
carbaME!ss
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP

MARTEN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
P.O. BOX 30013
RALEIGH, N.C. 27622-0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
November 29, 1988
Subject: Settling Cell Addition
Reidsville Quarry - Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Carroll:
Enclosed please find two sealed blueprints showing the new settling cells
which are currently under construction at Reidsville. These prints have
been submitted to Mr. Arthur Mouberry for his review. The Reidsville Quarry
mine map will be revised to show this addition. Please give me a call if
there are any questions.
Sincerely,
LZ�a
Steve Whitt
Environmental Engineer
SW/oe
Enclosure
cc: Horace Willson
Don Moe

DIV ISION OF
® North Carolina Department of Natural LAND RESOURCES
Resources &Community Development Stephen G. Conrad, Director
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsley. Secretary releaham 919 M3633
may 19, 1982
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
RE: Asheboro Quarry, Permit #76-2, Randolph Conty
Hickory Quarry, Permit # 18-1, Catawba County
Jamestown Quarry, Permit Jp41-1, Guilford County
Pomona Quarry, Permit #41-5, Guilford County
Reidsville Quarry, Permit #79-6, Rockingham County
Statesville Quarry, Permit JK9-1, Iredell County
Thomasville Quarry, Permit #29-3, Davidson County
Woodleaf Quarry, Permit #80-2, Rowan County
Dear Ms. Cameron
Your applications for renewal of the above referenced permits have been
approved. Copies of the renewed permits are enclosed.
The conditions in the permit renewals were based primarily upon the
initial applications. Modifications were made as indicated by the renewal
requests and as required to insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971.
Please review the renewed permit and advise this office should you
have any question concerning this matter.
(James D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
Mining Specialist
LAW QUALITY SECTION
JDS:pg
CC: Doug Miller
Jerry Cook
Geological Smvey Secti n-433.2423. Goouetic Section -73338M Land Oua6s. Soc:ion.733 4674 Planning an0 ma,:mory Section 733.3831
Laid Raamuca Information Service-M 2090 60• 27687 aaldith 2731 t-7687

, � � +`. ' , • ' '••'� '; • ram, q i , ti ` ` '
ENVIROIROb
- 1 1 - - '!.. ,, - • 7. ' - p •• - MMCiSt'iFSL\ L
' ' ' .. +. '" .J .. _ '• ; " ` ., Or- rober • 28, ' 1974
Mr. HoS, Willson J .;•`
A
Environmental -Engineer. z ,
��. Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 2479
' Raleigh,' N rthl�'Carollna 27602
' •' t � L -*iJ_ iJ V . � � � V r• SUBJECT:
���T1 • ri fvn. Pe
�"�rT •� A -
•SUBJEC : Cep' li :, lo., 3372.•"- :r .''.. �r ' •) ! i . � 'i ��
• Martin. Miri Etta Aggregates
'=� } South' at
f , S Reidsville Quarry. t ,
*. Rockingham, County
IF
Deer Mr. Willson: .
• a
'In accordance'iwith•.your application'receLved -December 14, 1973, we are for=•' ,
warding hera'iwith` Permit' No , 3392,', dated October 28, ' 1974; to Martin Marietta Aggre-
gates for the 'constructJL6 ti .and aperatioh of n- totally,.closed `system consisting of , '
two {2} eettlizi .cello; ani ' a• h6ld1ng".,pond in. ser3es,,'e pump -'facility and rinsing
screen to treat and recycle 0:264 �MC#? of wastewater from• .the Reidsville- Quarry
operation Rio bat_ there, la no diacharge•'to„the -surface waters of the State.
This pirsait shall be: effective* fund th"e dat© of its i.ssuanco until July 1,
.1977, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as -specified therein.
Also, anclosed• is a. copy' of WIC Form #50 "Cost 'of' Wastewater Treatment,.
Works." 'This fora is., to be completed- and,returned -to :this' office within, thirty
{3p} -ddys' after the project is •completed.
' • .One-'.(1)'set of approved pLgi6; nd' speclficatians. is being• forwarded to'yau.
Sincerely,yours,
B:y C. Fiutsbard
\: EnklosureB
cc:,. Rockingham . Coiintp Health D©partmenC
' Mr. J. Craig,Mck1q*e fi'
Mr.-- L. P. Benton Jr.
Mr.' Robert' A'. Carter;
Mr. H.-R. Feeler
Technical. Services-
�'

5 e
{ f
R
is
.� i u£I I L14 * »,
It
: r
-
x k
IV
Ll -- f . xlt IK.ngrit'3.�
..
a r
,IV a..
IN
iLIj i i W'4 tr t { ): �. 1,. ,.:« 1•.
t ra'.'.
-
Iif'SYR£ Ry. F, i C', .q.. a LM4 .r •. a fCIT ' t f WyJ f.�R xiTa} u`11
]Tf
,Dy
"�.-
+2�.` -lEar. Mfh r. rP:•.R^4y t -_`."• IIIri.:e: ' ♦-r .r.._
.,.
,
_ g.3 '✓Itc.fy.^ H•. } a ir,5., •i �f -> -1 � -^`T s .r
7 .. .
v� ,.,i
tl.t -�
-IL ..
(6
da tlJt jp•. t• C ) a # s A,3 ,3'" L`.i
X
`4. - - 17i� Lr :-K 1. < Y'L�-e k
4 U( ... < , it 'S'x 'w Ti �! r
p
...
L. i b
R" Itt ." �J$.:t1'.,l tv'!G,`s t1J >: ': .�T""• aCy, _C"'. 1
ti•iF. 3. 4 Sak. Fi J :-YP �'' Cf-. r�'�:VIp�
«
J.`ia�'
.1'1:.YR
Xf { ft,. S)b t [tH.
It<MF .ivf JlCf .,4 t: ,XXtIJTA'Sf: e.CL Vl.. 4i `,f3IV 2:k.7I.I
•
{.Y'� 11 4'14t9 .�
.E.E'FT
It
It
r
yv
1 s« h a 4 It
nr
ti(
_ F
hIt
f 1..4; 3 Aiv - br IV.• 41 � i
of
..
:I:.1 $.tn �'•� ` }
tr
y_
«IV
kr
R aY
a t.. ;_.� Y L
i 1
T
JI
i
� j5 1
u '.
• .. ..

(Page 1 of_2 ?
. NORTH CAR�IIdA '
ENVIRONMENTAL -MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
3
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
' r Raleigh
PERMIT
For the Discharge of Sewage, Industrial Wastes, -or Other Wastes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143,-General Statutes
of,North Carolina as amended,' and other applicable Laws, Rules'and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Martin Marietta Aggregates
-Southeast Division, Reidsville Quarry
Rockingham ,Coitnty
a. FOR THE r
-'construction and operation of'a.totally closed system consisting of two (2) settling
cells and a holding pond in -series, . a pusap facility and rinsin 'screen to treat and
recycle 0.264 MCD of wastewater from the Reidsville-Quariy operation go -that there
Is no discharge to the surface waters of. the State,
pursuant to the application received' December l,4 ► 19 3, and in conformity with-
. ,
the project plans, specifications, and.other supporting.data, subsequently filed
and approved by the Departmene of Natural and Economic Resources and considered
a :part of this* Permit.
This Permit shall -be effective from the date of•issuance until July 1,
19_a, and shall, be subject to the followincj specified conditions and limitations: ,
1. This permit shall, ecome void unless the facilities are'constructed in accordance
r with the approved plans, specifications and other supporting data and arc completed ,
and placed in operation on or before March'l, 1975, or•as this date may be amended:
2.. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes des-."
', cribed in the application and other supporting data.
3.' The facilities shall be effectively maintained and•operated.at.alr times so closed.
'system without any effluent discharge,
4. R.eporte on the operations of the facilities . shall . be submitted to; the.:etaff of the
North Carolina Divieion'-of Environmental,Meaagement at regular intervals and in such
form and detail as maybe required by -the Commi lion or its administrative -staff.
r
0

ro .
.ell`.
r • , [Z n=,;;Y3',.
L Lrnu r.il. Sig v .feu u.: ],�J`4 "t
ul
P
Laf.3 3•i il. 1.T L\ r
-1r: G. 1 t4s "-Id
- 7 rt.. vxiry; L.'MT�'i R4t•) a i �' l:J .t f r.1
'.., f.67-
'3 s,i ev., ava7S Pc 'Er ;o i=. r FO LPE r0. -A. piL ?Jb T[TW4 ("'ATi cuc 9UCl 171Z. FYGL3C
yt T ys; '4. a,1apZ Pe EEuc;*ns ou ,:d'a M ::u off. ,Taanxner. M;TY t.re:• i ,
' v•,FSxF GE 1.i�?'s nsLwi:;.' ., .
vvq. 4bbwAsty PT F];s Dec�.*•C6b!ra, Y•E Lta ,� i�c'z orcm:.^-ys .]uii c':Jxg .GOu3Tgsxaq '
^•l:. •JZO��GF v)' is?'' iJbGSE{' G:;oCe 97q IS .re. a bc,oxFru3*gem] .zrm¢sdnsvl:Th ETFs�
birxansuF Fo we .ub7TcvFloc a^a.�.u)�. ;'.. "..Td.,`�.' `Ag Tu cnt ycxur, i'"n,xgn,J ..
l. G O" 6 f#1 . .;A'� o A rJ
SC♦ t.✓�S "'ab tit-..V 5C- d1. y1. f•.:P.:i 4 p•-1.-1
K S
CIJ.-_, :i.,..]Z'O7. f_fY''hi+10 :W .
r CrTi '(Ol f}2 S:IGLGGCS U17C Oip L bTJTTC9Pi., J M^." 6 Zf OL 'r[i. 17,TV4 10 Ila
I _L sc •a_3 ucy Nlx p cYe Lu nr-.: 0; yzc J r..�x .:ys� �: )-�r;,� 0cacss7, ZGOKn:eo
-;VC sfx .r 44n Zoe" yL LFJSL ysegezox Dl*gi.:: ..
is .l,..t
1)EbUJffi6YK..[i4 G•c. i F: i`':iN:'? E�frNVITC. au.z:CT2
� � L 1 KsmiFl%kpl I wpia:sf'NMATT 'ONiiz704. ' � �

` S. Martin Marietta Aggregates,,at least;aia (6)'monthi prior to the* expiration. of
. this permit,'shall request'its.extenaion.. Opoe'reteipt. ofthe request, the Commission
' 'will review the adequacy of the facilities described thsraid, Wail if, Indicated, will,
- aatend .the permit for such period of time and under such conditions, and limitations
as deemed:, proper.
-6, This is a�.Class I Wastewater Treatment Plant which' requires. thai the operator in
• ".tesponsibl'e charge hold a valid Grade I Certificate. '
7" This permit is not transferable. -•" „�
e
... t t ' .. .. ...
Permit Saaued this the 281'N'�'.o ''° :'.Vday of. OCTOBER. , 1974, .
HORTE' C9RMINA', E M.RONPIISWT41; MANAGHKM "COMISSION '
E. C. Hubbard, Wractor
_L 7 1.,
t Divleion.of.Euvircomentel Management' By Authhrity'af the secretary-
Of the Departmentoof 'Natural and Economic Resources
a. ,. '
4
'. vl,l

1p
rrrrr u• ;%Xo- ,r;::.ast f,'...^. is> ':x` _ 7 ;` JS•.cd
e'-Ctrs
..
r �L;.{'i,} r1(�•,J A 3 a 1 a 7:; ! J a.
- P;}Y: Barr" 1 4 i.o-A Yr h.rµ a !L 2f;re•.r X
iv
d .r 4..,
d i
a
Y -
r
r •
T tF 44T. r.Y,
a
9
SoJ.+74ti♦
M
y'k1 'r'C f) I tl L 'i M t L
e y ..�
r
1p
✓.
- �. w -

1
i
r'ebroarj 7i 1973 - - -
tiS
Partin Varietta Agge,etes
P. 0. Box 2479 i
-=�ei sr Aiorih Carolina inn 27602 .. _ AITMMON : Mr. Horace S. willson :to
gantler ;
'.'.his is in response to yo•;ur'lettcr of Decc;be'r 27i 1972 br.which you 1
^a:;plied- fans .":xi supper inG data ail ;ui engireer's certificate for the
reposed new mter supply pond facilities for your Reidsville Ouerrp;"for
approval uLdcr the 'North Cao1_ia Laii fety S:=_:r of 1 G'7• The views of '
r.+.icccd Statc aganeies hate hcen o•atainedr as mi: ed by the lairs arA
the p2=z haie been revieired. �Ti additions you supplied additional infor
rrntion a'a our meeting Li this o fice. on February or 1W3.
tlnc ::ate. Gaality M7:ision of this Office advises that; since the
pond ir111 be -operated in a closed s•,lntem; no niztimm floss are required to
w released. -
i sL^ter our discussirin it is cots+rzred that at least 2sl slopes should X
he groirided for both slopes of the &Xmuiaaents and it is understood that
you plan to plant.stabiliaing vegetation.of the enban'.�aaerh i*maedi.ately after
construction. Lz additions it is requested that you:
a.=': Corxider the need for drainage at the toe of the downstream face
'of the embankmn, to prevent seepage through the fees of the damn-.
•taking into acccsnt the thicimess of the dam- -
b.. Mope the crest of the den gently toia+rd the pond to prevent erosion -
�t of the doimstrenn face of the dam by =w off.
trith these stipulations, the plan are satisfactory under the requirements
of the Dam -Safety lair, r1be lair requires that construction be connusneed frith
in one year aftertho date of amrovl of the application, or each approval.
is void.. Please advise us of the date when construction starts in order that
vs may monitor this requirement. - I
Sincerely,
cca Dar:rin Co'a+rri George B. Pickett, Director
Craig McKenzie:
Office of Water and Air Rasources
J. L. Norris }

/?A/o, 79-6
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
. Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
Application for a Mining Permit
Article 7 of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, 'The
Mining Act of 1971" ...After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in
mining without having first obtained from the Department an operating
permit which covers the affected land and which has not terminated, been
revoked, been suspended for.the period in question, or otherwise become
1. Name of Mine Reidsville Quarry County Rockingham
2. Name of Company Superior Stone Co., Div, of Martin Marietta Corp.
31 Home Office Address 414 Fayetteville St.. P. 0. Box 2479.
Raleigh, N. C. 27602
4, Permanent address for receipt of official mail (same as above)
. ... .. -
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Office Address Route 8, Box 30, Reidsville, N, Co 27320
Telephone .[phone]
6. Mine Manager W. L. Lewis
•
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the
best of our knowledge. We fully
understand that any willful mis-
representation of facts will be
cause for permit revocati n.
*Signature
Title Vic Pres. Planning & Development
Date ii�sn�1-0. /97z
*Signature of company officer required.

Reidsville-27
AFPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1.
Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned None Acres leased
2.
Materi.a is mined: Granite - crushed store.
3.
Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge El Underground
Shovel and Truck ® Dragl.ine and Truck Self -loading Scraper
El
Other
4.
Present depth of mine 80'
5.
Expected maximum depth of mine Ui-;knoyn
5.
Area 'of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine
map.)
a.. Area of previously affected land at present site that is
inactive as
of July 1, 1972 : None
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site None
B. Determination
of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1.
Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years
maximum).
2.
Total. affected acreage:
a. Area used for tailing ponds
2
acres
b. Area used for stockpiles
b
acres
c, Area used for waste piles
3
acres
d. Area used for processing plants
1
acres
C. Area of active mine excavation as of July 1, 1972
17
acres
f. Estimate annual acreage of new Land disturbed by
1.5
mining
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 3=
4
acres
TOTAL 01. 2a through 2g
33
acres

AFPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Reidsville-27
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total. affected acreage figure from B,
C.
2 equals acreage to be bonded.
0
- 4.99 acres
($ 2,500
bond)
5
- 9.99 acres
($ 5,000
bond)
10
- 24.99 acres
($12,500
bond)
X❑
25+
acres
($25,000
bond)
4. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining opera-
tions in North Carolina? Yes © No El
Check the amount of blanket bond:
$2,500 $12;500
$5,000 ❑ $25,000 4Naj
1. What aspect of your mining operation may have significant effect on wil.d-
life, or freshwater, estuarine or marine fisheries?
.This . minim; operation will have no si gnificant- effect on wildlife,
or freshwater, estuarine or marine fisheries.
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine?
Yes QX No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of Water
and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
Q74-OYP-2000075 Approval doqum�ntnot received to date.
Expiration Date
b. Is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Yes © No ❑
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of
Water and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources,
Approval document not received to date.
79-72-09-0005 Expiration Date
3. If your mining excavation will come within 300 feet of any neighboring
2

I
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
dwelling house, school, church, hospital, commercial or industrial
building, public building or public road, describe methods to prevent
physical hazard to such features. If mining excavation comes within
300 ft. of any of the above features, this operation will conform
to the standard safety practices as set forth by the U. S. Bureau
of d-lines and the N. C. Department of Labor.
4. Describe measures to be taken to insure against (1) substantial deposits
of sediment in stream beds or lakes, (2) landslides, (3) acid water
pollution.
(1) All waste eater from this operation will be properly filtered
by a settling pond before being discharged dounstream.
(2) Sound mining and engineering practices will be observed during
this mining operation to insure against the possibility of
landslides.
•(3) This mining operation does not yield acid water pollution.
3

n
Reclamation Plan
1, Describe your intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all.
affected lands and indicate the general. methods to be used in reclaiming
this land.
We do not anticipate that this operation will cease during the
life of this permit; however, at such a time that ti7e operation
should cease, only the T�raste piles and plant area could be
effectively reclaimed. These, we anticipate, would be cleaned
up and when practical, planted with grass or trees, unless some
other future use of the land would offer a more practical method
of restoration. The excavation itself could be used for water
storage, recreation or sanitary landfill.
J

Reclamation Plan
Reidsville - 27
2. Indicate what practices you will take to protect adjacent surface resources.
Neighboring properties are used for agriculture. We are bounded
on the north, east, and south by land owned by our lessors.
The perimeter of the excavation is protedted by dense woods, an
earth berm, and fences. We have been in.operation here for many
years with no damage to adjacent properties.
3. State the method of prevention or'elimination of conditions that will be
hazardous to animal or fish life in or adjacent to the affected areas:
This operation does not yield any toxic pollutants that ,.could be
hazardous to animal or fish life. :there :rater is needed to produce
clean stone, a settling pond or system of settling ponds will be
constructed accordinE to sound engineering practices so as to prevent
siltation of streams in the area.
4. -Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
excavations in rock.
This operation will conform to those safety regulations as set forth
by the N. C. Department of Labor and the U. S.. Bureau of 41ines. All
rock excavations z.,d.11 be done in accordance ,.ith :sound minis.
practices.
5. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
-- -- Exiting -trees-that-serve as a --view screen ill be left uncut; or
trees native to the area will be planted. :':There necessary., berms
will be constructed from spoils according to sound land reclamation
practices.
6. State the method of rehabilitation of settling ponds if to be reclaimed
during the life of the permit.
Settling ponds at this site are expected to be in use during the
life of this permit.

. ,
Reclamation Plan
7. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of mining refuse:
No chemical contar:,inants are used in this mining process. Unusable
scrap metal is stockpiled and sold. Other mining refuge, including
waste rock, is incorporated in spoils piles or in the construction
of protective berms.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of stream channels and
stream beds to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution:
Any ditch required to divert a stream for pit expansion will be
constructed according to sound engineering practices so as to
minimize erosion, siltation and other pollution during the quarry-
ing operation and after the operation has been abandoned.
9. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting
or remaining in mined areas.
The nature of our alining operation produces an excavation well below
the natural stream elevations, thus our abandoned pits will become
fresh water ponds discharging clean water do�.T.stream.
10. Describe how the surface gradient in unconsolidated materials will be re-
stored to a condition suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land
after reclamation is completed and proposed method of accomplishment:
This mining operation disturbs a relatively small portion of the
total land owned or leased. Any unconsolidated materials removed
to start an excavation on to expand an existing one will be left
at a final slope angle consistent with the material. If the
material is piled as spoils or used in the construction of
protective berms, the final slope angle will be left so that
revegetation is practical.
3

�eOC</.✓GH9M L✓ ,GL_l03✓/<eE pvy,phy_27
Reclamation Plan
11. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the
affected areas. Note requirement of Regulation Number 1.
The affected land as outlined in this ermit and shown on the
attached map is expected to be in use Beyond the maximum
permissible permit period. In the past it has been our policy
to establish ground cover of grasses and/or trees on earth
_ berms, dikes, and dams as soon as practical after construction;
and on spoils piles no longerinuse.
For the purposes of this mining permit we plan to use the
following methods to establish vegetation on affected lands
subject to erosion:
1. Slopes in unconsolidated material will be kept at an
angle consistent with the nature of the material so
that the possibility of erosion is minimized and so
"that"revegetation is feasible.
2. A ground cover of grasses or legumes will be
established on affected areas such as earth berms,
dikes, dams, and abandoned stripped areas and spoils
piles. We expect to use sericea lespedeza, love grass, %r
fescue, rye, or a combination of several of the above.
-
Lime and fertilizer will be applied as indicated by
soil test results. I
j. Virginia or Loblolly pines will be planted where
necessary on affected areas along with the grasses
and legumes. Nursery groom seedlings will be planted
at a spacing to yield approximately 1000 trees per
acre.
4. It has been our practice in the past to employ pro-
fessional landscape contractors and tree planting
contractors to establish a suitable ground cover on
land subject to erosion and to improve the looks of
the operation as a whole; this practice will continue..
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
i�
Signature_-''_i'/' �6�r��%"✓
Title
��� �� r�� ��. ��L(
Agency `—'Er-- 7.„�r"
Date
4

Reclamation Plan
12, Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of Section S of this Act.
We anticipate that, everywhere feasible, reclamation plans will be
conducted simultaneous -.:nth the mining operation. This will include
the proper sloping of spoils piles and unconsolidated earth cuts.
Deposition of waste material will be made in areas where subsequent
erosion into streams will be negative or at a minimum and to the
best of our ability.
;then a spoils area is declared dead, we will commence with
revegetation.
Following abandonment of the operation, we will within two years
revegetate all spoils piles and the plant area.
If settling ponds are large enough to retain as fresh water ponds,
providing silt and clay settles properly, they will be left for
such purposes. If the pond has been filled up with sediment, we
will revegetate with appropriate ground cover.
5

LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT --I
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right of entry and travel upon our lands or operation during
regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field
inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the
administration of this Act, so long as the Department or its appointed
representatives are accompanied by an agent or representative of our
Company.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right to make whatever entries on the land as may be reasonably
necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary
in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to
complete in the event a bond forfeiture is'ordered pursuant to Section 14.
*Signed �[. ir:
Title V ce Pres Plannin & Develo Went
Min Reidsville Quarry
-- company --Superior Stone -Company
*Signature should be the same as the officer who signed the application for
a permit.

/.� N
�P
y
0 11
ETTI!IlqG
POND �1
Z
s¢Tri .��rlb � 0ND / Qv //
�I
II1��1\
a
PIT
p.+C
I— E
.S
OPEN O PROPOSED AREAS TO BE
FIELDS MINED DURING NEXT
10 YEARS
WOODS
SUPERIOR STONE CO.
REIDSVI.LLE QUARRY
ROCKINGHAM CO., N.C. SCALE: 10330
MARCH, 1972 ey. >..,• s rt

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF MINING OPERATION
in the
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Name of Mine- Reidsville Quarry
Company-- Superior Stone Company
Address- P. 0. Box 2568, Raleigh, N.G. 27602
Date- March 11, 1970
Si gna
Title
lopment

A. Description of the Company
1. Cunership:
a. Company name- Superior Stone Company, a- division
of lvartin Marietta Corporation
b. Home office mailing address- 414 Fayette.ville Street
Raleigh, N-. C. 27602
P. 0. Box 2568
c. Telephone- 919/834-8421
d. Name and title of principal,officers-
W. Trent
Ragland, Jr.
President
Godfrey
Cheshire, Jr.
Vice -President
Administration and Secretary
Joseph Lrd.
Yates
Vice -President
T�arketing
John Bratton,
Jr.
Vice -President
Operations
V,'illi am
G. Ross
Vice-i resid,ent
Production
John W.
Graham
Vice -President
Planning and Development
(2)

e. Name and title of person authorized to represent
the company relative to registration -
John W. Graham, Vice -President, Planning & Development
f. Local mine name- Reidsville Quarry
g. County in which mine is located- Rockingham
h. Number of acres owned'by operating company- None
i. Number of acres leased by operating company- 121
J. Local manager- William P. "Preslar, Superintendent
k. Local office mailing address- Route 8, Box 30, Reidsville, N. 0.
27320
1. Telephone- 919/349-3333
2. Number of employees-.9
3. Ores or materials being mined- Granite
4. Mining activities -
a. Year mining originally began- 1959
b. Year mining began by present operating company- 1959
c. Estimated life of mine- 50 years
d. Total acres mined to date-- 14
e. Number of additional acres to be mined annually- 1 i
(3)

B. Conservation and Reclamation
1. Summary of past efforts to protect the environment, if any
a. Areas rehabilated for some use (include number of acres).
Examples include but are not limited to, land use for:
residential, commercial, & industrial sites; forest,
farming, pasture, wildlife, and recreation. Briefly
describe methods of rehabilation, such as grading, level-
ing,.planting of vegetation, erosion prevention etc.
1. Overburden used to fill rough areas on B. F. King tract
adjacent to quarry property.
(4)

0 9
2. Summary of present and proposed conservation and land
reclamation plans and procedures, if any-
{5)

C. Maps
1. County highway map with mine location indicated. County
highway maps may be obtained from: Location Department,
State Highway Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602.
Small maps of each county are available for $0.15 each
plus 3% sales tax. Make checks payable to North Carolina
State Highway Commission.
2. Map (accurate drawing, aerial photograph or enlarged topo-
graphic map) of mine area of a scale sufficient to clearly
show the following:
a. Property lines or affected area of mining operation
b. Outline of pits
c. Outline of stockpile areas
d. Outline of overburden disposal areas
e. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be
described as to location and distance from mine if
sufficiently far removed)
f. Location and name of streams and lakes
g. Outline of settling ponds
h. Location of access roads
i., Map legend
1. Name of company
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Date prepared
7. Name of person preparing map
Signature , &2,&&
(6)

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural R4� d) urcestR 13 1996 I AL
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT Lam__
1 (PERMITTED MINE)
I. MINE NAME Reid ivi lle Ouorr l 2. MINING PERMIT # 7 9-6
3. OPERATOR Me. A. nn.,.;r1!-il M.ki;,.Ph ion 4. COUNTY acki
5. ADDRESS �e finX 3oolZ Q6l,co fJ� 27621
G. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 11-I4 0? 7. RIVER BASIN Qoon.lee
8. Person(s) contacted at site M:I e ti S10#'+'
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? 2'Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes D'No
11. Date last inspected: $ /31 / 93 12. Any mining since last inspection? eYes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ia'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14, Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? 2'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes o If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: �rlra
17.Other recommendation and comments: uhv, �F;_al 0r4495 nr a .1L;re1A
S-1•n ln'1k iti�n .A v<u...L. �.. nrn ..,I ralrcl �
IS. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? VYes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes No Proposed date �/—/-
20. No. of additional pages of Ipnspecc�tion� Re�pyort o . 21. Copy of Report sent to operator 3 / 13 ?W
(date)
INSPECTED BY: DATE 3 / 11
Telephone No: (3 3t. 1171- 4 (vo
While copy io file Pellou copy to operator Pink copy m Alining Spaeialist 10197
7✓

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, r-
Division of Land Resources, Land Ouality Section prr� „
"- Vj!4,
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE) 12AND QOALITy SECTION
1. MINE NAME �� e, cl Ste. //r o m ..,. 2. MINING PERMIT # `� 4
©-
3.OPERATOR /°>4../.-., /+ , rW. /'/a v-•.e 74cs 4.000NTY ✓4ue/. %•<�..-.
6.ADDRESS P.O. ienr 3 o/'. d1<.lo.;C" A/c 17Fz: �-
6. Person (a) contacted at site Alm b /i - - rs E.<F•.. r s / 2/iy/a z
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? E'Yes ❑ No B. Pictures ? ❑ Yes " No
9. Date last inspected: 9 / // 1 9 � 10. Any mining since last inspection ? Q ves No
11. Is the mine In compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
12. Is the mine Incompliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit 7 Yes "No /
d no, explain: R .-../.. f:..
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oftsite damage? ❑ Yes B'No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed and / or taken: 740
/ r•.: /</ K ,• , ,. .- . - r • • �-
✓NC/ L..
1S. Other recommendations and comments: & 4e. /74/c �� •n.•:r
G t Sic/.
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report / - map accurate ?
Q'Ves No (Explain) Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed date /_/_
18. No. at additional) pages of Inspection Repo _. 19. Copy of Report sent to operator /!_.
I(date)
3 INSPECTED BY;
Phone No:(917) J
White copy to file Yellow copy to aperaror Pink copy to Mining Specialist
We

RECEIVED
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural IVsA4A, WU
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section SECTION -
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME a�t'llr�S�V;;-�. T(c (�?:�c l 2. MINING PERMIT# �7y'
3. OPERATOR — 1-%7_tcE
5. ADDRESS _P;'IJ (o,C Loos I!�a�_�-rc r--=-AIC d-76-I,)-
6. Person (s) contacted at site l\lr.1i3 le_?F67- -1 �>'
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? �Z Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: (n / -� 1;i9 10. Any mining since last inspection ? 0 Yes ❑ No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? EK Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? El Yes ❑ No
It no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
1, All
14. Corrective measures'needed and / or taken: ('r(iz
11a .�S:.F.� l�iLar'cC1a ;ti'7�r :�[2 t'.,;4tti f ,. lit F'c` tt-y. !�4 :r+� 1--lk-,P�7-2 i -f
i'':;,_e..i�r.�,, 4• r'�(�' l�+i�.l.t .r�tL �.���-:-'r:�r`l �'a..ra ., ",, r r`, � /_•(� <'..
rL�iL1[, �: ..c �rll�larr t`r�4 r; ��i r�u�: iLC IS117��stiy` r"'1 rl,.r Lc L r..1 i
tr
15. Other recommendations and comments: TZ-- iS > 9—::-
16. Is the'Annual Reclamation Report!/ - map accurate ? d Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑ Yes 0 No Proposed date / 1
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator,/ /4/ 1 -'7o .
(date)
INSPECTED BY: .,'ham!>!-OAVCr`1 DATE: 1 r J_ 1 rr
Phone No: (J vat
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
- BI09

ri
r s RECEIVE,)
JUN ()N
P: cqr, 1989
r n/at tl Y.SFOrION
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Govemor DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 7, 1989
Horace Willson
Martin - Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27612-0013
Gentlemen:
Attached is a copy of our report documenting an inspection
recently conducted at a mine site for which our records show you
and/or your firm to be responsible. The inspection was performed
under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 74-56 of
the Mining Act of 1971.
Please review the report.carefully and note any problems or
deficiencies documented by the inspector. Furthermore, please
note any recommendations and/or specific corrective actions
required to correct any deficiencies that may be listed.
The responsibility for understanding and complying with the
terms and conditions of your mining permit and the Act lies with
you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have
any questions concerning the attached report.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
aws
PC: Mining Specialist
Sincerely,
G, Dougla Miller, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
am5 Nwd1 Point Boulevard, Soar: Im, Vinson Salem, N.C. 2n0S3295 9 Tdepharc 91A76t 2351

North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development n
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section (Cj,
MINE INSPECTION REPORT ✓UN p
(PERMITTED MINE)
n`'Q
1.MINENAME yLCTV-milE7A tiQrd5 Or2MINING PERMIT# -7—& 'Ilk
per,,
3. OPERATOR ffoOeR I) - WsWi F. nA F)6�!ee G4TeS 4. COUNTY enLk:w.5Fifk)
5. ADDRESS Y.O Iio,r 30013 kALei It UC_,-7_7&/7 -Oo13 '
6. Person (s) contacted at site V !f_'O e .
7. Was mine operating at time of insJ?e�ction ? ©'Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? O Yes No
9. Date last inspecletl: �e 1 1M I 10. Any mining since last inspection ? I ©'Ves No
11, Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Oyes ❑ No
If no, explain:
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? p es ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
G�
14. Corrective measures needed and / or taken, )I0. !wre nik. n1R OLa-iG++4 blkxMR�,
4 'lebilL(nM u.-LCLI.- Lc4oif�>.�.kH �1//.r .�/IG+L l.ClD�e✓ //+�:0/Tiife�.�
�eom� ,
15. Other recommendations
if . vI>t.oEPy,
and comments: VaAN bu YHI&.u.Pi( M..G: wCtn� wZk BJAi&n 6fL
rAi I epofli b IU ..EVfCeu/w QcN�/li fdn ,)_��,�k' t,..�
/OAA"IA1.
/.�Il/..a.�•!,./�
.� //Olt GI%��• G//CfIVW`+'�F M1/(�.GQLI� /,�'r LP OW�M /✓�.l'VP�-'�ei,�M/V/L-w✓Lf�Md
!LZLirilGif tYiiOl'v+%L�✓.ZL�u,.� /.J�.V /G�✓% e�n+n �.[Gf%Lh �� ilLf/QGi
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map accurate ? 2-Yes E]No (Eiiplain) Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑Vas 0-No Proposed date _/_!_
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator & 1 %u 184 .
'' ____ •� � Ida te)r;
INSPECTED BY: nY, DATE:_I�1 2 / O/
Phone No:(g1q) 74v 1— Z3-5
White copy to file Yellow ropy to operator Pink mpy to Mining Speclatisr
REV. Wee
9N
11 A

'r
i `
INSPECTED BY:
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: /may i/,/ �iOnif-� �?ez
Mine: �,GiOSViL L.0 �Y, Permit Number:
Date Inspected:_ „2,i- Sr,O -24 Date of last inspr�eon: cti
Product: ��'jJK/f� �y� Person Contacted: /Uixe
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A, Erosion Control:_Z2fJCK ,52. G'F hG /7,jZ* 'oze AlEui F,E'r-S.S� _
6Lf sXS6o s2w�9 f!em6,ecE.5/N6 N10c--�v,
B, Waste Disposal:
C. Reclamation: ,/j�,P�,/ �., �i rTE'oc .�IJ . 2e na G
II, Annual Reports - Adecuacy of plan
a i. A t
/ S r s/
Deficiency letter needed Letter Sent y-�o-�5� Reinspection Needed—

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine Reidsville Quarry Permit Number 79-6
County Rockingham Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Martin Marietta Aggregates, Southeast Division
Mailing Address P. O. Box 2479, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining,, Date
v
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months. ,
(a) Tailings ponds 0 ...Acres'
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 2 Acres
TOTAL 2 'Acres.
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next .12 months. 3
to
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
5• Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine Excavation C Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature
of person responsible
for reclamation AeA
6164
Title
Date 9 � S — i¢
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 276U

INSPECTED BY.
NO.r-I—_
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: /n7AA?Ti.:J lZ4q,0 LZI—A Rli6.
Mines KF/!)S ✓/U.F_ OY Permit Number: Z G
Date Inspected/:. tld —V, 12 Z/ Date of last inspection:
Product: /. 0i ,dr_'j STnnJe Person Contacted:
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control:_ 061 /1tJ .riLaJ ri?!5'14 IV417FA 1V(2A1 t7 II&P-
wy
l
C. Reclamation:
II, Amoral Reports - Adequacy of plan
• r l.G / � . Gia
Deficiency letter needed r�� Letter Sent ,P2'12 '21Reinspection Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
O.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine Reidsville Ouarry Permit Number 79-6
County _ Rockingham Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Martin Marietta Aggregates, Southeast Division
Mailing Address P. 0. Box 2479, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds F Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(a) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 1 Acres
TOTAL 7 Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 2
4• Describe measures taken for erosion control.
Six acre fresh -water pond constructed during 1972-73; dam and disturbed
areas seeded with fescue by landscape contractor.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine Excavation 0 Acres
_ (Continued on reverse side)

L
6.
Describe
reclamation
carried
out
in last
12
months.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation 11w. /ZjL
Title
Date -s7-;�3
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761.1

.. Kra ' � ;r. • ' _ � - 4
} DIVISION OF EARTH RESOURCES
. August 5, 1977 .
Mr. Horace Wilson.
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
rRaleigh, North Carolina 27612 +
Re: Reidsville'Quarry.-,Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Wilson: ,
• On August 2i 1977,'an inspection was'made on the above referenced mine
as required by G.S`: 74-56-of."The Mining Act -of 1971.." Reclamation and r -
conservation-practices"carried out -to date were.found.to,be in compliance
with 'the provisions I of -your mining permit, I suggested to Mr. Roberts
that he consider;mowing'or'bush-hogging the excellent"sericeA- espedeza f
,-growth on the -larger dam.to enhance the vigor and general appearance of•the
.vegetation,.
If this office can be of assistarice in regards"to redlamation procedures
or erosion control techniques, feel free to contact us. `
Sincerely,*'.
' •Lindy M. Leonard
r " ' Environmental Technician.
Land Quality Section

...,. :.. .., ', �`.' '.. ,•.Li9d:�BC r.'fi S3IYTf ' CL'y�JCLiSi.. �.
; •
. .
. Ec':Vp,;�;ylp:;9 Jf JF A=3YP.
'. `'. '., ', :.. •,' d '. ` : - ;IB,'. :kt fc'$li: 5c(' .ni iDlGi!Y.
.'..'-
'` ., � �' �•7n11 A:� ;Jd!.iuYfDW- l ISIICI �•�1v�+ Ni.I - . :.
,
9Vcrp1. nlf] no 9:n'S'A,^_-K f:G.}7v9[,F ft'. Rtl 't�1Cf -'�C 1pu, II lfib
l +' :!•f f1.1 if SSD3" .Sl>I' }0. 'Y'1.TP1 :'GI".P.V \)Y a� .i�. P �i iI �T�II�IIS Yf,
PD' Gib ljW AL a<', u7., pVL'P` `IZ 1 � 1f V. 6� "Pn �4.'^Y5P ! +5+� M''9}•VahNJOP
,a8- •w' .v Py a.:7'<t�,; ':" a p;.4rjr]rm !;ni:,,,.:'}•?avC' roCaf7Pt
.•.
.
ryJ.[9D Sr3'AP^,t-O-9firi S9 ::3 •.1 D7
.l
YUl•xp;-.'.TOuIP.
',c[ 'f1 [t'.;St1 A3Pea:a, r-0 i.',^N'YSl �a tiS❑C fl]y P'fVj •_
..
'l.i/J'
.. 51.::":ICTIt IJY }:':I'J9� �]1 �,r♦.9, l.t .�ufl0.1v; 3+'So W A13l:10 . til '1I
�.• .CV 1317.Ao Sf' g(.'S} It Awt4 ui
J
' PBiDkmin±'t
' fr]• w 'Fjj LGdl Livia r. ..,
a

INSPECTED BY: L.m l �,..A�. ND.
INSr"ECTION REPORT
Company: f{lpe-r N O1 2iGrrg QccOc carE� County: 7Tr I'A�An-w..
Mine: �c n�: /Inr Ql. zow _ Permit Number: 79- L
Date Inspected: Air.T <r 2� 1477 Date of last inspection: $cQ� P, 197E
Product: c2n 14<HFn 4...,, ie Person Contacted: _ 1��g /�„p, 92par2r5
I. Remarks - Measures Taker.
A. Erosion Control: A1/ YA9,,�j p_A 19 .y2.!'a car- /Jr Yung
B. Waste Disposal:
G. Reclamation: tioN�
RECOMMENDATIONS11 E
•.'
s i /, s
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent r/ Reinspection Needed .

l
DjjVTjSIDN OF LAND RESOURCES ��CEf VET'
.. , . � ...... , .. SUN . _ .
01 QF 2 a 19Tg
URCET
June 22, 1979
Mr, Horace Wilson
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
RE: - Reid ville Quarry -- Rockingham Quarry
Dear Mr. Wilson.
The referenced quarry was inspected on.June 18, 1979 as required by
G.S. 76-56 of "Thu Mining Act of..1971." Reclamation and conservation
practices carried out to'date were•found to be in compliance with the ,
provisions of your mining permit.
If this office can be of.assistance in regard to reclamation procedures "
or erosion control techniques, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Wilbur E. Christmas
Environmental Technician
Land Quality Section
WECImm
cc: JimmSinmons

., Gy1PJ
2.]Yk17:'•i�TJ;-4
'gib I l •. .J: k i. �..'
.. �' '.G
fg al
...
'.!! N•.-� S)
J
C at I �'t" •. .' JJ Y/, .. •.

INSPECTED SY: 1411liWX E A4s�9S _ N0.
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: IV,9ahN 1h HN.e-H,4 44 ae' A-IeS County: iP0lF/N9/IHM
Mine: Rrbltwdle ©unxrt4 Permit Number: 7 9 -6
Date Inspected: 611,7129 Date of last inspection: 1az7 L_
Product: C/ZWA ed lyvPerson Contacted: Mg. JgmeS kowj-t
I. Remarks - Measures Taken QNR)�Yy Co:.7igal ZNryec ie lc
A. Erosion Control: A// Rar a-FC nw✓ ww (, wn-ica �arS iiirok.,ti s�fN'w,
o:'fs o/L'
B. waste Disposal: Sole 02 used 7�6 Fds A/.+cs io As AeC440.
C. Reclamation: ,vvo�/c siNce 'el � s wen& �o/�k� n ce pA V.cs_ Asa .
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS:
h% P yf F. 4A. T
1014" 40 A,106
Cam ol/pwce
Jw-r'
W�'N1 ner4nif
Ae�*dw
4. W .v
.S VS%�M
0
glAalea -5 .voi¢'�
r
�
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent t/ Reinspection Needed

DIVISIONr OF LARD RESOURCES -
May 219.'1980
16,
Mr. Horace Wilson I d.. '
Martin Marietta -Aggregates
-- P.O. Boa 30013
Raleigh; DC 27612
-RE: .Reldsville Quarry (Permit 079"6) - •
".Rockingham County, NC 7,.
Dearlmr. Wilson: -
-�The ReidsvilleQuarry was inspected -on May 15, 1980, as required by G.S. '
76-56 of the "Mining. Act of 1971". Mr, Rub Roberts of Martin Marietta .was
present during'the inspection. -
The quarry was found to be in compliance with:tbe provisions of your
.. minlnj5.permit... - .. ..
ICthis office can be of assistance-in�regard-td reelamatlon,proteQuiec
or: erosion control techniques,- Contact ua.... -
Sincerely,
;Wilbur E. Christmsa
Engineering lechnieian ,
Land Quality -Section
Y
WEc/dP C7AY .92*=
'cc: its Simone .
• - .LAND'QUALIT7 SF.�E'14A1 •

rvqu.6nv
-
!
r �4
i Y 3 2
t
- Sf1Lti'J -Ita p TVA. Acf'TCJf _
. gnu=i[;ct Jt �rcc}JUT x'•u•
• �' LGibS\
...0 GXOEy O`) bUJ'SLL] gf'j71 c1JGh- .LLtr9t COrIGbcV IU ..
j - ;{, � � J LT •` ctiU 1 4 6 dQ8{ 1 I Cb T�i" {.r J.y,.FG'L4 J CI4,CYaJI G}•U [ [�Q!t._ ,
Ir
„v.6 3nat 3 r.,s Zy,mu C`% P§ TG ui uiXalr;t xM1 t,,-;;gib �nr ]onv ri Xn u.�14
)! cla ?v VY f. p15",p `v o. InJe IZ {'..ty bol,rd...Lt o? .1L[T,[
:. .'. Sl+['. bc74 ttfi�.,:,,,bt i!: •i l;. tYf u,, ,J/ !,'." fiJo1061:01;yuz Cam
r,• 'J7;: _a.uur.ey ,a 4•
`3
r!YII 9.;"i S.w 9Li�t� % _
It [ .i•%: CJ[ f. - Y eLb?:LYW -
.. l,v alMybG Y.Y. U•.. .. ♦ ..
. 1 ,
C.. Lhde,,.lM. Gl" r 7 I•�:; ti Ga' r #
:O ✓, -,. '

INSPECTED BY: Lf/[•/bG/? E. 634Xf-SAZY< NO, Npy/ t4. 41
INSPECTION REPORT LL
Company: InaRku MALMO Ag2ae5yi%S County: X0ekI rd/9✓h
Mine: 12EAd5/ille Q4AgPv Permit Number: 79-6
Date Inspected: MRT / S� 19PD Date of last inspection: J4Nf IQ111 % 9
Product: !'k.WSh AdI .S'�TSNP. Person Contacted: Alai •eolleAA
I. Remarks - Measures Taken /
A. Erosion Control: 411 2Gwvil' •�,i:.,)n O�//Wf A,»!4 tjKr/
S. Haste Disposal: f=itl,c 5 �/lan� w.ii�i e� u.Rrrl fa 74i// ,4/e 5
%C/L b00%a'f? sfde4e,•le allea S.
C, Reclamation:
& COK4EN1'S:
<le :n.
sno. .
a/sc
Ak
4elomilville
-/ . a
T�WC UY'iI LI: �'U�WIS,
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent Reinspection Needed

' .Div1S1oN OP LAND RESOURCES
May 19, 1982 NND Q
Mr. Horace Wilson
Martin Mariatta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, N.C. 27612
Dear Mr. Wilson:
The following mines were inspected as required by 11,C.C.S. 74-56 of
"The Minfpg Act of 1971",
1. Reidsville Quarry (i79-6) - This quarry in Rockingham County was inspected
on May 13, 1982 and appeared to be in compliance with the provisions
of your mining permit.
2. Jamestown quarry (p41-4) - This quarry in Guilford County was inspected
on May 12, 1982. Except for the need for additional atone in the rock
filter below the soil borrow site on the south aide, the mine appeared
to be in compliance with the provisions of your mining permit.
3. Pomona Quarry (BS1-4) - On May 12, 1982 this quarry in Guilford County
was inspected. Other than the need for additional atone in the dam
breach the mine appeared to be in compliance with the provisions of
your mining permit,
4. Hicone Quarry (R41-6) - This quarry was inspected on May 18, 1982.
This inspection found that the problems noted in previous let�:!rs
and meetings with Martin Marietta personnel have 'sen corrected. There
were a few cables, rubber and other scrap metal showing on the ground
which will have to be removed before the mine is considered reclaimed.
Your cooperation in correcting the problems noted above will be appreciated.
Should you have questions please contact me.
Sincerely, -
Wilbur E. Christmas
Engineering Technician
Land Quality Section
WEC/cm _
cc: Jim Simoaa' ..
I

Tu�sPEcrm sY: —�i)I' l � rJ,��/�nc _ — — No.
11� 9 N��OIY
Companys- leIw L,!-j /%/ogl-e MA County:
Mine: _ PerQ5u;llr Jbun.rr., Permit Numbers
Date Inspected: 111#y r /3//34?2- Date of last inspections
Product: Gd/ia 56+e.n '5�40^- Person Contacted) /liuti %Lo%v;aY'.5
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control: All Awi ,ff ru« 11n..L 49z �55
R. Waste Disposal:
//II nno p
C. Reclamation: ®/Awi e„Q K,(V,'�/�heJ
� o o
�ihG ,(.aw ,4-i' /�i5�✓ �/�/gip. u.�P( �N 4K,555y i9KPk5 R/o �. �nX
RE WIENDATIONS & COMMENTSs /L pro /r�e.�s ti,, �e 9 . AKe. e4'74 ..a'�,fr1f
vn/ ND/Z % s,'r�e _ o[;en/iUK�ew u.s-.D �//J i'.d
l9 ]v /AI161 //C/LlH1 O ioh�%1 wr5f OG !�Pf✓./ 4+'l i'w N. I4'�-+Y HOInSC
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent Reinspection Needed

3
111
DIVISION ,OF A?D RESOURCES
I
MAR' j'7 1983 r.
oNg"QUAL'ITY,
.
March'16, 1983
SECTION
P4rx. Horace Willsoti
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O.'Box 30013 "
Ralp'27612 ;•.
i ii 1J.C.
6 ..
.
LtL'. Reidr ville Clun.rry' t;
Perm t,"79-6
Roc) in8ham Co,mty, North Carolina "*
„
Pear Mr. Wilson:' 't '
" Tho referenced nine was inyp'ected'on'March 9, 1983.as
ra--uired by
''t:C.G.S`.•74-5G.of "The t'l�ning Act .of 1471"
This.inepection found that the m*ne site appeared,to
be' iu.'compliance
with the rrovisione .of .your mining pertait. .
Your'cooperationN is. appreciated.. Should -you have ilueotions please
contact me'?';
Sincerely,
n '
4lilbur. L. Christimaa
a
rnyincerih% Technician`;
` Land Qualit� Section
cc: 'Jiro Simons

' "- - .a., ,Cyr 'k.. 7 iyi�h�� - i- - ss ' _ li�~s 5 :;°..r 5 r t�• ; ! ,� f. .�!e5 / �.7 r `, � ➢__ r, .'. . .
}, - 1 -`' -.G •41 ' 'ti. I. a,Cy,t L1 .h � � � - � ly, ! ! _ •,•. � J
- - '" ti, w y r' r 4 "`ik � ` ,fir �'ti r b .:r � y � � .. , • � � r � �
r
1. y' r,S• - � �'� - - A i.• 1 ,•i •1 �F4 r t w, �ru«5 .^ems -..
OF
' .A - - : _ a _4 - - ryas t,� r r 'r�G;�,.•• •. p,. �, -r "T .., �t `.. -" .
C:r" ;.' .+=-r•'! 'dry '..4 a
- '� S .U' a .•, •'x S � `,e-.:.�'�s 4,t r' ''fir: �}�+, aF i"�� tr -
jaz
as -
it
•-}.'"tiir i� / .. . }'• x 4�Ar . ' _ V� _S+'�� .1... +t'yF s,. _.4•, y� �'•. a ��" i-�. �,. •�'., . '',�
-
-• win
I y.. 1"• A
., ' � { - 1, I>r - A Y :•, . .. r ! . Y :..( ,
^ •"+,. ,• . �•- t: .y , f � S } • L i. r r-, • .. . by : ' 4 ,�-: - `.
.. �� �, . -fir' T. _ '• r,?,^ , LV,.1 ; F V �'•F" �. .
4.11
x ''` � � '-•, •'r - � �.,} � � ,L t _a V .. fir: _ '� `'~ `tin -x � ..
LL '•�^• ! #, e y ` - � - -' - _ "; � F '%; }
too
' - ' r. .'S' i; e,. ., « .S..Y i. „i is ', � �•. _. S�' , ,. �
a 1 ! k•', <,�{ .r �_ ;„ _ r'�. LJ x. .w� a sue; i ;4 r {,, � '•ky .�� - � s '� ��� i

tINSPECTED By: _ 4j;/6woe ejP'i SJLFVAA
INSPECTION >REPORT '
R0.'�psur3
Companys ingx-,%N /%iAlJ . e >LLA County: /zc'l i N A"Lh
Mine: gei d/S O. We -Permit Numbers
Date Inspected: _ �%%ke 'cif / fa, 3 Date oY last inspection, 10Av/3,/98 Z
Products ._._<fe re Person Contacteds QIu� /lebetif5
/�cesr wore 2 .
I. Remarks —Measures Taken
A. Erosion Controls 5ed;; e..4- cowi-7t;e.4 141 go e45 Aw 1 i;p ro l-
B. Waste Disposals
s44*dJ
-A: sole a• 51fe_ SLa= .n /a/ —/r.
C. Reclamations pica
s+ d lf,:
s FIgw
L.Q F/0`+5 A'.PA±,t
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS:
Deficiency letter needed
Letter sent, V Reinspection Needed

�41

�r~EDNorth Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor James A. Summers, Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
May 1, 1984
Mr. Horace Wilson
Production Manager
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27612
Dear Mr. Wilson
RE: LRtIDSVILLEi QUARRY (79-6)
POMONA QUARRY (41-5)
JAMESTOWN QUARRY (41-4)
HICONE QUARRY (41-6)
11tlD
1AND QDAUiv SEOSION
The referenced quarries were inspected as required
by NCGS 74-56 of "The Mining Act of 1971."
The inspections found the quarries to be generally
in compliance with the conditions of your mining
permit. The only deficiency noted was the need to
seed the disturbed areas along Riverdale Drive at the
Jamestown Quarry.
Your cooperation in correcting the above deficiency
within the next 30 days will be appreciated.
Should you have questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Wilbur E. Christmas
Engineering Technician
Land Quality Section
swc
cc: dim Simons
winsmn .sa l em BeoionaI T)ntee 3003 Noon Point9QUfeV@Ia. WInS101 Sn I am, NO 27106-3295 Telennonegig3512351

INSPECTED Bx: lVijj lz No. AVM J" n /
U: _ �_. • i iti• i14
Company: /%iIJ P, iinJ //]ARir_/'iA /�-�q/rc r/cS County: Aclei^v9/n-`"
Mines %lei'4a;)lc Chu nap I Permit Numbers 7 %' -6
Date Inspected:. A7pk--il 191/9Ps/ Date of last inspections MAHCh/ 9,/9d'3
Product: C./C Person Contacteds /V"4 //d4ewls
I. Remarks - Measures Taken n
A. Erosion Control: Srel'm e.f Cow�r9-i ry crY i'nr {pwe/s gpn. 4%OYa.�
/en-3ed% b y /Y11r1 [la.....us'Fhny..., of U�ert,s+-F aw .
B. Waste Disposals S%vr /cam/a o
C. Reclamtions r:.•n-'�
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMENTS:
Ale iiw
2/r ss o-i
a4e
qi lir F-
p :' f �u
A/Oft' -i 4N p/Aw
S�Gy
OIMK�NR.OL''w/
Al
iooV
IV"$ Y- v is 4-, .
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent 4/ Reinspection Needed __

did
did
.. j
.}..•
i.
DIVISION OF LAND�BESOURCES .'
• -. _ ,<;.
.6 Ht.
April 10, 1981 -
-,. e.
' Mr. Horace -Wilson
Martin Marietta Aggregates. �. J .
P:O. Box 30013 _' '
8aleigh,'North'Caroline27612 "
do
d.
RE i, Reidsville Qua try '(Permit C79-6), -'
Dear Mr. W.naoU. ' ...
Thee Reidsville Quarry in IRockingham� County vas in lnspeered on-April'7, 1981
as required by C.S. 76-56 of "The Mining Act`oE:;1971."„ Mr. Nub,RobertSL accompanied
..me `during the inspection.; - _ -
Idd
The' mine was fou_nd'tobe in compliaoca.vlth the ,provieiorie of :gout '• `+
mining permit.
If.this office can bedof-assistance io Coneerbation;jwd. ieclamatlon'practicea
please`contact us.... ,.
Sincerely,
LL
ddl
Wilbur E.•Chriermae
Engineering Technician
- Land 'Quality%section
WEC/ma
cc: 71m Simone
do
6.
t„ - -

to
ro
or
i
.v
mo
or
'.f ... {
.. .. ... .-.. .., ,..:
r
Cf 'jSIC :;'LT9CfIR"
roolo"of, lo ma or
' .,p6 3 H •, 3
• L 5 ". , "Tpfft L'
.,
C.:L ''. rwst ` '
'
.;
-'^
o l
.'` lop,l
'.
G+4j.L D, Okip PT .&lice i c6UCEL,3LRCTCU
ti1R�:Lec FYL,3GTU't bx Rc[TGe^_'
P.
'FOf3L6 O.j15'tV ceaeboo.; 31 le M;l: GUe
1TOht3�'6Us OIL )OfIC L*
t' +yU+Yi 1L L3L.
3_, .•
l L i ", .�
-•.
a ..r�
s r.ee7 :{3. 4 �` i� �. �F�v f n f;u3 Vcs nTt 3917
:IL 4m 2L fi+sxs vc ue a"ca
-' c• �..:
Yic� ba i,, yisxi:n Tu veL-iTu ,,,sit inn s> Laf.
v
fiL. ;fn. Ecs q'vuL L31.TkT .3 ioRT "
" .. - e
"., .. ..
.. t.`}iJr^R5A{;T 11JICa'(isrxu.i�' a p'Fk
"' jni(. ii r;+in 3
ymt Tl '.:sr{err- ,L'Cx'.!s ce .•s
nr.• ioxsce T au':f 3`} v
LL
r 'p
—or
..
vrr=:i i� r f _. .00kL
it
d
�. nl
or ✓ t
r _ ..
..
o
y,
rr X" 4f '•
-
I or
L�.
Ito Cop
pio moo
3..3
to
M i
.. ... ..`. •.
y L

f
.'NSPECTED Br: tu+lbuP eha)sYmrs NO, 4/v&tj /
„
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: 1"AP, eJ /YIt12iC{Hq AaenGt*,"s County: Aor i ryel
Mine: _ //P4W$bi/le ©uPermit Number: 79"66
r
Date Inspected: Ail 7, /98/ Date of last inspection: jV4 /.Sf /i8 0
Product: GF:dh+dr .44zwe Person Contacted: 4114A Ad stv�S
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control: /4ro1/3 t-'a..r/vw y,// Sc/4 w/ yex, A+wo/(- ,C..o,.,s
B. Waste Disposal: .f,4c(c„'/«Q .n�zem/ ..EUEg s {a be talc( IoPle -
FiicB redo? 76 art/ iw Ao itsra -
C. Reclamation: /{fl4t re.eS,0 r:s4sox.'.w-+rfG/r *3 &4vx s. HR+a55 /0o k5
a
�6�. $aunt A.4se s/Oo j-$ .esoG % ae r J9ee%z �fr+i S,fiRiNiS.
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS: /%; dooiks oaavd , N/o any,,i�� ze"At"Il rtm i6L.
:
Dn-!�
nr5 �(
e-ed+ �i S >Et x"d� . AnCONS.daxi a ro -S Ti-aW oil
i4l o'n1 //ram 'fa rn+..4 for jf was rr" y�iis
fit' Ill 'j 1 *n >10 h w; jd Aa n� &'tA Ai e/ds -For. /.r�a e.+ n�
lw;k vL--e .hWAJ,
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent �_ Reinspection Needed

MINE INSPECTION REPORT r (+ lr E
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
8003 North Point Blvd. .iUii 20 06
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
[phone]
�f�,, y�7 � LAND QUALITY SECTION
1. Company: �,�%//�/n �%• P'U//n/��T//! 2. County: f(/,{�f1 411;omo; 3. Mine: / p% ///�N''// �.c�///�lillGi /� 4. Permit No. �7/f — & .
5. Person Contacted: le/'e ,f///� �P � e 6. Date Inspected
7. Pictures: Videotape Slides Other
8. Was mine 'active on date of inspection?? Yes _LZ� No
9. Erosion, Control Measures taken.
10.
Describe any offeite damage.
Tl`%i%%o
11.
Are public safety provisions
in compliance with permit?
12.
Waste Disposal measures taken.
13..
14.
Is Annual Reclamation Report form accurate? Yea
If no, explain _
Reclamation'accomplished since last inspection.
No _
f
No. of acres /
15.
Reclamation measures needed./�®/}'�i
16.
Ocher recommendations fi cosmiente:
r
17.
Were recommendations made to
operator at site? Yes
.No
.18. Follow-up inspection needed? Yes
19. Copy sent to operator? /�Ye
INSPECTED BY: /�1&/ i Y x
No /r
late) No