86-03_3_Redacted

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural I our II
I:� �1�101998 U
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section it ,i
MINE INSPECTION REPORT If„
} /� (PERMITTED MINE) = -
I. MINE NAME C kOvrrf. 2. MINING PERMIT
3. OPERATOR V vI L4vr 4. COUNTY Sum
5. ADDRESS PO Boa -71 1=1K� IV C.. 2 U-a1 1
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE I1-12-:�0ol 7. RIVER BASIN Yadk: n
8. Person(s) contacted at site T; He ))a....t
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? &4es ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes DeNo
11. Date last inspected: 0, / Il / 1?7 12. Any raining since last inspection? Pa Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? CN'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? &KYes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes / o If yes, describe the
Ivne and severity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
17. Other recommendations an comnrenls: SFoyt'rn pN-f d ��os.�„ 'on-Aw/s one
In 41n0. u1glj?
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? O cs ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes 2% Proposed date ! !
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report I. Copy of Report sent to operator.3 /4 / 8
I..�J (date)
INSPECTED BY: 1-ovv rl /'o7/+PA DATE 3 /Y 14T5
Telephone No: `(33714600
White cogv to fele Yel/mv copy to operalor Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197

EZ, m 6�7� /12 n 1
1
North Carolina Department of Entironmerrt, Health, and Natural Resoiiices, u L/ Lam=I{jl`I
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section ON FFR T 7 1QQ7
MINE INSPECTION REPORT ju U - U
1151=0 IAITTEI f RAIK10% BJ
1. MINE NAME '`� Wa(llq 2. MINING PERMIT#
3. OPERATOR 4. COUNIY_S,,req
5. ADDRESS„ 1 El k;.\ Nlr_ ;I4t6i1 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE t -
7. Person(s) contacted at site Htje-1�
B. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ®"Yes ❑ No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes 9 No
10. Date last inspected: 3 /15/ qb 11. Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? flYes ❑ No
if no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ®No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
16. Other recommenr�dations and comments: h %)o,(ibUf lerti s, _5��1 �`int� 4- �u,) #_v�-A ) mk _
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +I- map accurate? El Yes ❑No (Explain) Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes N No Proposed date 1 I
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report C) . 20. Copy of Report sent to operator I I
ff (date)
INSPECTED BY: j To ' nse n Tan SO &% DATE
Phone No:( q 10 ) -7, _tp
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
9191

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
ll
Immi,
f
June 19. 1996
Mr. Mike Poplin �'��(�--�J-`l LS I�•, 1
Vulcan Materials Company
4401 N. Patterson Ave.
Winston-Salem, NC 27105 JUN 2 D 1996
Dear Mr. Poplin:
Re: Modification of Water Quality Certification By------------
V.ulcan.EHaa Qum
Surry County
DEM #960065
The 401 Water Quality Certification issued on 23 April 1996 contained an additional
condition regarding potential sedimentation into the adjacent pond. This condition is
hereby removed and replaced with the following:
a Temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures contributing to the above
referenced pond will be designed to adequately pass the 100-year design storm in lieu of
the 25-year storm design standard: and,
It. If requested in writing by the landowner within two years of the date of this
Certification, Vulcan shall investigate and if required by DEM shall remove any
sedimentation in the pond which is directly attributable to runoff from Vulcan's property.
All other conditions of that Certification are still applicable. Please call Mr. John
Domey of my staff at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
E.
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers r
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office (1„ -
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Tracey Davis; land Quality
Bob Smiley; Marshall Miller and Associates /
C; 515"S� Nban�—wsrto/�S L �
LN F }
Division of Environmental Management • Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 • Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Cpponunily Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ to% post•ccnsumer paper

20'd -1y101
}�State of North Carolina
vepari.ment of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
AINWIE'"7A
ari�� �Itrarrr
�EHNF�
April 23, 1996
curry County
DEM Project a 960065
APPROVAL of 401 Waster Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Mike Poplin e- Y4)1b
vulcaa Materials Co.
4401 N. Patterson Ave.
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Dear Mr. Poplin:
You have our approval uo place fill material in 1.366 acres of wedands or waters for the purpose of
expanding an existing quarry at Elkin Quarry, as you described in vow 9ppheation dated 21 February 1996.
After reviewing yew application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is issued
by the Corps of Engineers.
7'rils approval is only valid for the purpose end desigo that year described in your application. If you
change your projec4 you must modify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you most follow the conditions listed in the attached certiticadua. A 50 foot wide wooded C ,
' shah be planted and maintained along the Yadkin River and Streams adjacent to the property bouadarles in the
Yadkin River flood plain. If the owner of the adjacent pond is willing. Vulcan shall prepare a bottom con. tow
hql map of the pond (existing condition) and Ihcn dredge the the pond to the apprmcontour within existing contowithin one
\� Cyew after the berm is established, stabilized and the SR road is relocated. In addition, you should get any other
federal, state w local pemdts before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept arty of the conditions of this certification, you rosy ask for an adjudicamry hearing.
You moat set within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask fro a hearing, send a written
petition which conferees to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Admjntstradve
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447- This certification and its eondidons am Fain and binding
unless you ask for a hearing.
This louer conipiems the review of the Division of Emimarmarred Mareagemem under Section 401 of the
Closer Water Act If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Wusmn-Salem OEM Regional Office
Mr. John Disney
Central Files
Tracey Davis; Land Quality
Bob Smiley; Marshall Miller and Associates
$mcerely,
on Ho ard, Jr. P.E.
V "'R D.Ju frfP o /SPV�
Cap, "It6 / `u-sfa`LA,
r'oNrew1 w/ Bed
`l Aey (,. e, We coo NKT
P'Am c�r,A.NR^tC I^64 ) wi.a
w l l
,.ta-, ,
Emlronmedal gustiness Branch, 4401 Reedy Crack Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX M733.9959
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer , 50% recydedn 0%poet consumer paper
EW:t STovM PPL GTE 9N3 S-IhJi213itU NdD-Jnr ST:TT 9ESI-9T-!.HW

Uukan
Materials Company
FAX
DATE: 5 - 13 - 9
TO: �( c A,,. S — G\L&O Q , b
FROM:
Number of pages (ex s page) c�
TM._ 7
., a Iv e A
X" I
C O� r &L. w. +-L
Message:
44, 40t Cea LL
o.
k4(:_
5 w / O JV
I
Cff�K'Ivwc.
n
n
�—
Qlo(tne�
J.
li-+a..�JL IlCM �If
J.f��IC
-Jl f
T
ti.� L/{
/
rJ
So�,a,--h
(�cX-/c.
Phone: [phone] Ext.
Fax: [phone]
MIMF& i Miv MW , P C 9M 423M . WIN9TCN.CLLEM, NCRh CPACUW 271154239 • 7rLEPHCNE 91C 767�
TO'd STOH bbL OT5 9N3 s-mNaHW NH9-iM ST:TT 966T-9T-LHH

NON1 Carolina Department of Environment Health, and Natural R L� �1 r I.
Division of land Resources, Lard Ouaf Section c
MINE INSPECTION REPORT MAR 20 1996
%I.CAlvaIIu ""1":� B
// Y
1. MINE NAME M, It,, r NA1'/,'� /C %rn A,,Qa Nii Alt. 2. MINING PERMI
3. OPERATOR Uz lore. )ZI »:a/< 4. COUNTY
5. ADDRESS x/73 Z7�-r-PERMIT EXP/IRATION DATE
7. Person(s) contacted at site TM i en ! u ", TGu,:r� n!!nn
8. Was mine operating at time of inspection? CKYes ❑ Nd 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes rNo
10. Date last inspected:/AI-, 11. Any mining since last inspection? ( -Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? XYes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? Kyes ❑No
If no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in ofisae damage? Elves $INc If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken AU[!
16. Other recommendations and comments: f �,. • / �. / d/,.
f.
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ©Yes ONO (Explain) ❑Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑Yes i<No Proposed date/ iS/__Z2
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report_ 20, Copy of Report sent to. operator �_1115 I�G
�y (date)
INSPECTED BY n! /. a'4n� DATE1 K /�{L
Phone No:(. Sin ) / ' J
White copy to file y�r�l„!%w <'. /7: /PMYeIMw copy to operator Pink ropy to MininH Specialist

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 23, 1996
Sony Colurtyll '.
DEM Project N 96tAK5t✓
APPROVAL or401 Water Quality Cerllncallon and ADD FIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Mike Poplin
Vulcan Materials Co. N SECS1�
4401 N. Patterson Ave. l.r`` AtiQ QUQtu
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Dcar Mr. Poplin
You have our approval to place fill material in 1.366 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpuw: of
expanding an existing quarry at Elkin Quam, as you described in your application dated 21 Februmy 1996.
After reviewing your application, w- linve decided that „„a fill - covert; I by General Water Quality
Certification Number 2671. This cerifeation allows you to use Nationwide Partin Number 26 when it is issued
by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. if you
change your project, you moo notify us and you may be required to .send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions !iaicd in the auachcd certification. A 50 fool wide wuodcd
shall be planted and maintained along the Yadkin River slid .sncamrs adjacent to the property lxmndmies in Wa
Yadkin River Rood plain. If theowner of Ili adjacent pond is willing, Vulcan shall prepare a bottom contain
map of the pond (existing condition) and then dredge the pond to The approximate existing contour within one
year after the berm is established, stabilized and the SR mad is rdocazed. In addition, you should get any other
federal, slate or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you dot not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudiuuory hurling.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, solid a written
Petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This ratification and its conditions are Final and binding
unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Mansgemem under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. R you have any questions, please telephone Joint Dummy at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely, 1
U�1/
Proton Hmwud, Jr.
Attachment I
cc. Wilmington District Carps of Engineers V.E.
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domcy
Central Files
Tracey Davis; Land Quality
Bob Smiley; Marshall Miller and Associates
961X)05.in
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NO 27607 Tolophone 91g-733-1706 FAX N 733 9059
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Adrian Employer • 50% rocyclad 10% post consumer paper

I

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural P"urces, A:
Division of land Resources, Land Quality Section In „
MINE INSPECTION REPORT ID III .II S66161 AVW
(PERMfTTMINA I�:21.
n���� �.
1. MINE NAME 2. MINING PERMITS oNo
3. OPERATOR 4. COUNTY 5c17Li
. 5. ADDRESS Y .A-LSa 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE //-/ -r7/
7. Person(s) comacted at she Tole - poej eop ✓
8. Was mine operating at time of inspection? IN Yes []No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes ENO
10, Date last inspected: 3 1 r21_LY 11. Any mining since last inspection? 6sT Yes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, ex,Ialn.,
YA.) 7rn ou✓< C�n< r ! Yva 'm /e... /.,, c. .<. .✓� .n< .�%� nnd��
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ,Eflyes ONO
If no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offshe damage? El Yes No 8 yes, describe the type
and sevedty of the damage:
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: .
tra,h r frcY,„� c�r r ✓ ✓✓n n4f✓. ✓ v...✓< ,./ /�_ ✓Lra n._ ''/r , < n~vna.�
r J 6 > /
/A rn< ,ram/, f,. f Cl / , /n ✓/ /. i
16. Other recommendations and commends: hft OY&41111111 jlle,ileed,w /,
eokl)n4c (6G of L 5/+nwn 0a1 /%a /S972- /55 2 rv.ter✓ )W40, o ne 4,1 /O-/?-SC.
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ®.Yes ❑No (Explain) ❑Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑Yes ®No Proposed date_J /_
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report_ 20. Copy of Report sent topperator .5
)/ (date)
INSPECTEDBY: 24ii //- �3zez� DATE
Phone No:( y/// )7)/
White copy to file JZ0I?. 3Spr yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G„ P.E.
Director and State Geologist
November 15, 1995
Mr. Tim Hendricks
Vulcan Materials Company
P. 0. Box 71
Elkin, North Carolina 28621
RE: High Air Blast Value Recorded From the Production Blast
on September 14, 1995
Elkin Quarry
Mining Permit No. 86-03
Surry County
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
This letter is in response to your consultant's, Mr. Stuart
Brashear of Dyno Nobel, Inc., investigation report dated November
2, 1995 which was faxed to Mr. Tracy Davis of this office. The
investigation report contained information to address the high air
blast recording associated with the blast conducted at the quarry
on September 14, 1995. An air overpressure measurement of 130 dbl
was measured by your company's seismograph.
This office has completed its, review of your consultant's
investigation report. Mr. Brashear noted in his report that he
monitored three primary production blasts with alternative seismic
monitoring units, in addition to the'unit normally operated at the
quarry, to determine if the -standard unit was operating properly.
As a result of his evaluation, it was noted that the quarry unit
tended to record values ranging from 3 dbl to 9 dbl higher than the
values recorded on the alternative units. Mr. Brashear recommended
that the quarry unit be taken out of service immediately and either
replaced or properly repaired.
I concur with Mr. Brashear's findings and the
or repair the current seismograph unit to prevent
in the future. Furthermore, I do not feel
additional changes in the blasting procedures are
time.
n Geological Survey ScCiiOi1
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
Land Quality Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
need to replace
faulty readings
that any other
needed at this
Geodetic Survey Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX-919-733-4407
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Hendricks
Page 2
I appreciate your company's prompt investigation and reporting
of this matter to the Department. If you should have any questions
on the above, please contact Mr. Tracy Davis, State Mining
Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
<'(. ,Lw,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/TED/td
cc: Mr. Tracy Davis, P.E.
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E. (w/copy of report)

NOV-02-1995 16:57 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NC TO
19197332876 P.01
To
Fax number:
cc:
Fax Transmission
No. of pages incl. this one:
Tracy Davis - NCDEHNR
919-733-2876 Voice: 919-733-4574
P. Dotson - VMC
From: Stuart Brashear
Date: Thursday, November 2, 1995
If you do not receive all pages, please contact:
DYNO NOBEL, INC.
8585 Gatehouse Ct.
Concord, NC 28027
704-795-0 9161704-7 95-0917
Subject Elkin Air Blast Study
Special Instructions: Tracy, hard copy to follow, Stu.....

NOV-02-1995 16:58 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHI -Ts NO TO 19197332876 P.04
DYNO NOBEL INC
400 Perimeter Center Terrace, 9110
Atlanta, Georgia USA 30346
Telephone. [phone]
Telefax: 404 698 9557
November 2, 1995
Mr. Tracy Davis
NC Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1148
%111ni"t. Air Post Monitoring Study at Vulcan Materials Company - Elkin Quarry.
Mr. Davis,
As of November 1, 1995, three primary production blasts have been monitored at the Ellin quarry
with alternative seismic monitoring units as well as the Geosonics 2000-DK unit normally
operated at';the Elkin quarry. To perform this evaluation, an Environmental Technologies GPS-3
seismograph was deployed adjacent to the Eklin quarry unit to provide a comparison of air blast
values from' equivalent overpressure sources.
The resultant air blast data from the three shots monitored in this fashion are as follows...
Air Blast Evaluation
Elkin Quarry
Date 2000 - DK GPS-3
114dB
Ill
1 !1 /
1 4dB
11!
1ati
63
OL
09
As is eviderit by the results of these shots, there is a definite bias to be found on the Geosonics
unit towards recording high air blast values. To insure that the bias originates with the 2000 - DK
unit, the November 1, 1995 blast was monitored by this office with two GPS-3 seismographs.
These units, deployed adjacent to the 2000 - DK, recorded 117 dB ad 118 dB respectively.
DYNO
Explosives

NOV-02-1995 16:59 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NC TO 19197332876 P.01
The actual (cause of the apparently high air blast readings recorded by the GCOsonics unit is
beyond thescope of this report. The purpose of this study was to determine if the apparently high
air blast values r=mud at Elk.: repr esented an actual situation where considerable modifications
must be made to the existing blast design, or whether the measurement system was providing
errant data,'. For the three blasts compared for this report, the average delta between the two units
was +6 dB; This represents a significant margin when nominal blast values are considered.
As a result of this study, it is our opinion that the blast in question at the Elkin quarry that
recorded e)tcessive air blast was in all probability well within the limits of the Elkin quarry mining
permit. To insure that errant data does not cause future confusion as to the legitimacy of blasting
operations at Elkin, the current seismograph utilized at Elkin will be replaced or repaired.
Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding the contents of this
report, please do not hesitate to contact me at once.
Respectfully submitted,
Stuart Brashear ISEE, CSI
Technical Service Representative
DynoNobel, Inc.
SCB/
cc: T. Hendrix, VMC
P. Dotson, VMC
R. Flinchum, DNI
S. Percy, PEI

NOU-02-1995 16:57 FROM DYNO NOBEL — CHLT, NO TO 1919733297E P.63
VV : nae Tent 1 1'
D.Le 11i 1,90 'i.rt : L5:22:56 Cillme:fc, M, 5116r9S
Company Duno natal
Operation VAC
Blast Site Elkir Buarry
Seismomeler Closes: redid Ece - betlina scales
0ir Ptak : 1:7 dB P 1,2212 sec
e.01
lJv ---
E1 —
0 02 0!9 0'6 ale t!0 12 1.4 116 2!0 N
LonBltufinal Peak : -0.166 inhee P 0. 4512 tee
0.2 r
_D °Jti`w Ili �,fl
a 0.2 '. 0.5 0.0lB 110 L2 1.5 1.6
all, l 1!B e.0
T.aa.wrm Peek : 0.119 Were P 0.3515 see
0.2
0.1 V '�l1n,�vw
0.1
0 0d B,a — B1fi 0.8 :.0 Id Li L6 ]!8 2.ff
s'erIlGol Peak : -0.I67 in/sae P 0.26& sale
e,2
u 0 ��'�h'�s'��f���/IAIJff I,sVI((II
: ,0. aI
1" '�� V 'cu I�Ylv�✓JVVJWYvV.h
Veelar Sam Peak : 5,209 inner P 0.3604 sec
Es:;maln : n 54ary 0 ::1 f1.5 Story 0 21 f2 51 ory 9 z1
rrarsve.se
0 00
traq enay
0 1
Frraar.ay
F•nquea.y

N00-02-1995 16:57 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NC 70 19197332876 P.02
SA 1105 event : 17;
Date : IV 1/95 iimc : Jj ?2:12 Celibra{iom Dale 5r16195
Ce.mpanu : Dyne Nobel
Operetion vmc
31ast Site : Elkin
Seiamomaler Closest prupvLlj behinC -tales
Bin Peak
0.21 r
118 118 IF 1,1074 aec
N 0I
-0.01 ,.......
0 0.2 � 0.: 0.6e�B
L0 1�2
.__
l,4 1.5 a�0 �0
Lo,gitoEinol Prot
0,16 Inhvc 0 0.0t35 Sao
D a.B 0.4 0.6 B.B
1.0 LZ
1.4 1.5 1.9 9.L
n P,:,nsc Polk
O.Br
0.191 Inset 5 0,2441 vat
�J 'r�/Anl �,/ij�e� N 41 %U 4N"w^�•"./'�
.._._._-_
-a.a
0 0.3 8.4 0.5 0f8
1.0 12
1-4 I.6 ]'9 B�0
Lenlicai Peak
0.2
-6.133 inrsee 4' A.]471 sec
-a 1 P
-.9
0.2 0.4 0�6 9.3
1�a 1.2
L4 1-6 L8 2.0
vector 5vm pcae
0.3rrI
A, 224 i•laeo 4 22471 sec
a 0.ir
0.1
e.e
LD 1.B
,,.
Dswga Prubablllty Estimate.: Cl Sterg 0 4] 11.5 Slv.y 0 21 12 Stura 0 ?1
aey!la.eleel
ver i.al
IBA.-r-r.p,.,..�..-+�.
j 10
18
I}
i
itaguenty
Ir.vaen 1N
1
10 100
Ell i. e1... ..1 r.,...,.--.. ,. ...... tre9uevcg

K.C. Department of Environment. Health, and R at ural Resources.
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone i .og
II Datc:g /I Shea for
sTrmc 'g. am
❑ pm
Can: Placed ). Rcccivcd ❑
Returned ❑
1. Project: Vu& — EI*4✓ GJ4t± — pl eop- F).94,LdriCount,: e+01 "'r
2. Conversation wah: jrT (/A Telcphoec.'Q! :11F::#116
J. Affiliation: TAW10-YAKia
4. Content of convermuon:
i
r
r ,
i r a
iI/11�1•i�ltaA�����
9-
.,Z��s�_:7�r�
AMIDIt
a

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
September 6, 1995
Mr. Tim Hendricks
Vulcan Materials Company
P. 0. Box 71
Elkin, North Carolina 28621
RE: High Air Blast Value Recorded From the Production Blast
on August 29, 1995
Elkin Quarry
Mining Permit No. 86-03
Burry County
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
This letter is in response to your consultant's, Mr. Stuart
BraShear of Dyne Nobel, Inc., investigation report dated September
1, 1995 which was faxed yesterday to Mr. Tracy Davis of this
office. The investigation report contained information regarding
the high air blast recording associated with the blast conducted at
the quarry on August 29, 1995. An air overpressure measurement of
133 dbl was measured by your company's seismograph at approximately
1300 feet from this blast.
This office has completed its review of the investigation
report prepared by Mr. Brashear, it appears that the excessive
airblast reading for this shot was a result of the timing used for
this blast-, the -undetected reduction of actual burden at one or
more places along the free face, or a combination of the two. I
concur with the remediation measures outlined in Mr. Brashear's
report. Primarily, the remediation measures are as follows:
1) Should conditions exist in which timing changes are
required, these changes will be reviewed by a Piedmont
Explosives' technical representative prior to
utilization.
2) The driller Is log will be attached to each shot report by
the blaster, ensuring that geologic information observed
during drilling operations is communicated to the blaster
prior to loading future blasts.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAY: 733-2876 FAA: 733.4407
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAY 919-733-4407
An Equal OppoRuniiy Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%pmt-consumer paper

Mr. Hendricks
Page 2
3) Burden measurements made prior to the loading of front
row holes will also be attached to the blast report,
providing additional documentation of proper blast
loading practices.
4) Any situation in which cutbacks or unusual face
conditions result in the blaster being unable to
adequately measure burden by traditional methods will be
profiled by laser profiling methods to determine precise
burden information for loading front row holes.
In order to reduce excessive airblast readings in the future
at this facility, the above remedial measures proposed by your
company will be considered a part of the blasting procedures
outlined in Mining Permit No. 86-03. Please attach a copy of this
letter to your mining permit for this site for future reference.
If you do not agree that the report constitutes a request by
your company to modify your company's mining permit, you have the
right to request a hearing pursuant to G.S. 74-57 to discuss this
matter further.
I appreciate your company's prompt investigation and reporting
of this matter to the Department. If you should have any questions
on the above, please contact Mr. Tracy Davis, State Mining
Cr-%pe- iallcr ar (919l '72-2_A7-7A
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/TED/td
cc: Mr. Tracy Davis, P.E.
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E. (w/copy of report)

SUP-0571995 07:30 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NC TO 19197332876 P.01
From:
Stuart Brashear
Questions?
Call704-795-0916
Fax [phone]
To:
Tracy Davis
Company:
NCDEHNR
Address.
Date: Sept. 5, 1995
Tame: ?:30om
Message:: Tracy,
Hard copy to follow via mail........ Stu
DYNO NOBEL, INC-
6585 Gatehouse Ct.
Concord, NO 27080
919-733-2876,
Raleigh, NO
Pages: 4 (including this one)

SEP-05-1995 07:30 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NO TO 19197332876 P.02
DYNO NOBEL INC
400 Perimeter Center Terrace, 4110
Atlanta, Creorgla USA 30346
Telephone = 404 698 9471
Telefax: 404 698 9557
September I, 1995
Mr Tracy Davis
NC Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina
Subject: High Air Blast Value Recorded at the VMC - Elkin Quarry. Shot Dated
August 29, 1995.
Mr, Davis,
At the request of Vulcan materials Company, this office in association with Piedmont Explosives
investigated the primary blast dated 29 August, 1995. This shot resulted in a recorded air blast
value of 133dB. the results of this investigation follow.
REVIEW OF RECORDED SEISMOGRAPH DATA
As there was no video record of the 29 August blast, the recorded seismogram from the blast was
reviewed in.an effort to determine the cause of the high air blast value_ In reviewing the
waveform associated with the au blast channel, several observations were made.
Based on the characteristics of the waveform, both gas ejection pulses and block motion pulses
are present, This would indicate that the speed at which the rock moved off of the free face
during muckpile development was faster than normal (>70 fps). The block motion pulse is
indicative of increased velocity of face movement, resulting in an increased "pulse" of air being
pushed in front of the face, resulting in increased air blast values.
As can sometimes be the case, this increased velocity of rock motion was accompanied by the
rapid release of explosive gas through the free face or through stemming ejection. As
observations made by Vulcan Materials personnel have indicated that there was no visible signs of
stemming ejection, the most plausible cause for the gas release pulses would be venting through
the free face.
DYNO
Explosives

SEP_-05-1.995 07:30 FROM DYNO NOBEL — CWLT, NC TO 19197332876 P.03
REVIEW OF SHUT DESIGN
Given the nature of the air blast pulses, the shot design utilized for the shot of29 August was
reviewed in, an attempt to isolate the probable cause of increased face velocity and potential
venting through the free face. After reviewing all available short information, the most probable
cause of the increased face velocity is the increase between hole timing utilized for this shot.
The blast was initiated in a manner that resulted in a deep echelon being formed off the free and
secondary free face. In achieving this pattern of initiation 42ms surface delays were used down
the primary free face for between hole timing. While rock response varies from quarry to quarry,
42ms between holes would almost certainly result in significant movement of material from the
adjacent blast hole prior to the initiation of the next hole in the row. While the development of
the echelon reorients the actual burden dimensions from the standpoint of confinement, the path
of least resistance for the front row holes is still almost perpendicular to the face, providing the
potential for subsequent holes to be unburdened prior to initiation_
It was also noted in the shot design that the first three front row holes were drilled on an angle
ranging from five to ten degrees. Should the amount of burden in front: of any of these holes have
been reduced in localized places on the face, venting of gas may have occurred, providing the
cause for the sharp gas ejection pulse noted at the beginning of the air blast trace.
REIFYIEDLATION
In reviewing all aspects of the shot, it is evident that even with the recorded high air blast, this
was a well dontrolled shot. There was no evidence of flyrock, and vibration values are well within
the expected range for the shot in question. The presence of both gas release pulses and block
motion pulses 1C inr-lic tine of reduced burden bevuag praacan# in certain arias Vf t114 shot. As all
blasts at the Elkin quarry are first profiled with a burden pole and tape prior to loading, the causes
of the resultant air blast event would seem to be based on either the timing utilized for this blast,
the undetected reduction of actual burden at one or more places along the free face or a
combination of the two. In order to insure that the potential for high air blast readings in the `
future are minimized, the following recommendations are provided.
A. Should conditions exist in which timing changes are required, these changes will be
reviewed by Piedmont Explosives technical representative, Butch Beaver, prior to
utilization-
B. The drillers log will be attached to each shot report by the blaster, insuring that genlogic
information observed during drilling operations is communicated to the blaster prior to
loading of the blast.
C_ Burden measurements made prior to the loading of front row holes will also be attached
to the blast report, providing additional documentation of proper blast loading practices.

SEP-05-1995 07:31 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CWLT, NC TO 19197332876 P.04
D. Any situation in which cutbacks or unusual face conditions result in the blaster being
unable to adequately measure burden by traditional methods will be profiled by laser
p rvii lii h�,r. ++��tiiVua tV uVtel•li llllV Fir lei hi��4 VurS%i1.11 LRIUrmaL on Lair lval�dtng ofilont 10W liumb.
SUM MARY
With the absence of video documentation for this blast, the cause of the high air blast reading
must be based not on human perception of the "sound" associated with the blast, but be based on
the characteristics of the air blast trace on the seismogram. The presence of a gas release pulse at
the beginning of the shot and the longer, block motion pulse throughout the blast provides an
accurate assessment of the cause of the event. The remediation steps outlined in this report will
provide additional safeguards against such an event occurring in the future.
Should you have nay questions or require additional information regarding the contents of this
report, please do not hesitate to Contact me at once.
Respectfully submitted,
Stuart Brashear, ISEE, CSI
Technical Service Representative
Dyno Nobel, Inc.
SCB/
cc: T. Hendrix, VNIC
P. Dotson, VMC
B. GrahaErn, VNIC
S, Percy, PEI
R. Flinchum, DNI

5EP-05-'95 17:39 ID!VMC ELKIN QUARRY TEL N0:4 Ja1R6-2941
r r
pyl Z`Geny
Many_ eLq.�AI Repurl No.._..._. eeix.1
type m Shot .fl'Ca7aa' n.r ._Exact Time_cY✓_.
'
Pope of Material e�..__. - StrollNa.
Grid �- ..._.
]is_ance_ �..ytn�—IFt1 Direction, _ Gral
(To inall cloudiest beading neither owned or mooed)
ri $eis. Location !<eeF_1DIat. 1o$eis. p�p.�0_�-Grid
02 Seis_ Loutien c�Dlm, to Seta yj��... Grid
53 Sale. Lophion Ohl, to Sels, Grid
�'`_.._...—_ _... Maximum
Number Of —sue._ Type of Sampling _yT7 _ Ibe. Per
Diameter (inMea) s Face NaipM1t _.�..-4k
Spacing _.��.._ Sub owning_.._
Belden_. Number of Pray.
'
Method of Fii AlONeL Type of Circuit Series _. _Para!!.! —
Perellel Seriesp___ Typae of D Chris: Denvidi 7.L DadaoeQ27�.YF
Trade Name •.n. c[�C4_O1C�11/�-__.--
Holntoack
2
Delay
Perm
DCGrn
']
J.
_
Z
- I
a.-
_/�I
_
-a
-
-_
Weather �r U�l 'C�lo.udy El Flesh ❑ Snow
Ichei two) ❑ Hat L-lerarm 0 Cold
Wind From El N ❑ NE 1_1 East ❑ BF.
(check one) 1-j S C4SO n Weal ❑NNW
Feagmemation LI Eatel C) V. Good L'1 Good I-1 Felt ❑ Poor
Dackbreak ton. ❑ 2D it ❑ Do it ❑ iffy n. ❑ so M. or mare
Trade Name al Eapiosl.2s Amount^
aaw+er Facto/ —/i Del at oil J4.ar2.— W Oil Cement
Bench a r j Grid Map Data J��3,-.� Scale perhaps.
R.marlic
Report
tt376 Pei
Hmarol
To!al Pounds --itz i+-i
Tans of Materiels ZG4 2 Plcdeced —
Di t bgt'o ntloca eualhre Oscar
? / )
Plant OFile Su 6apc�E'K Elaster Sgnatue(,lz(�.L/.
Stale Safely Rap. G' License u S 511J r l.y�y� ,_

SEP-05-195 17:40 ID:QMC ELKIN QUARRY
1
TEL NO:; )i176-2941
#377 Pal
�a
N
Li
a
.R)w

. EP-05 '95 17:42 ID:VMC ELKIN QUARRY TEL NOJ�1�6-2941
«378 P01
HOICIOecN
No.
z_
I=�
OBIPY
Period
vz
4,
a'�h
U ..
t
' Stemming
_`L_
Pounds
Poond9 Per
HMPIpecF
3�5
Taal Pounds —22s�,f.
Tons of Mount �„\ �
Produced _ V __
ryp cel Hchi
/Bhowocadan Pomer
I L
Blemmmg
<Topr of Bench
7 7r
Length - U7 IR.)
p1 HoIB
41]
doer uvei I/3
—q__ (Ft )
of Sub D MIN

SEP-05-'95 17:30 ID:VMC ELKTN QUARRY TEL NO:4 )n186-2941 #372 Pat
LPsl) 0.01zrb
Tuesday, 8/29/95 14:13:05
DYNAMIC CALIBRATION CHECK
5HAKETABLE CALIBRATED: e/14/95
By GeoSonics, Inc.
Box 779, Warrendale, PA 15095
TEL: [phone]
* SAFEGUARD SEISMIC UNIT 2000DK a*
SN: 2318
Tuesday, 8/29/95 14:13:05
Event: 839 '
Client: VULCAN MATERIALS
OseratiOM_ELKIN - IS£U Lgcatlon:_R._DAVIS _ RR-46
Distance--lo-Blast:-1'300\
Operator:"MITCH-'WAGONER
Comments: SHOT GRID NN 33
Triseer Levels: 0.03 in/sec. 118 dh
Record Time, 5 secs
Range: Auto 5 iFs
USSN%OSMRE Resort
Frevuencv ihz)
TRANSVERSE

ID:VNC Pi IN QUARRY
. TEL NQ:c )i1.T6-2941
----------- --k373 P01
1 I�d •.I
Freanencv (nzY
OISRATIO14 & SOVNp TIME HISTORY
Time Scale: 0.1 iIWJM
Data Scale (saismlc): 0.32 (i Nsec)
Data Stale (air)' 0.018 (Psi)
SUIMRRV
PPV (in/sec)
Ln..1
Eo..IT)
Le,.14_I
PD (0.001 in)
I.07
1.07
1.12
PAR (s)
U.$17
0.10
0.10
FREQ (Rz)
22.7
29.4
29.4
RESULTkiT PPV:
(i Msec)
0..is
PERK AIR PRESSURE! (do)
l 133�
f Psi) 0.01276

SEP-05—'95 17:34 ID:i
SUMMARY
L T V
PPV (ine*10 0.11 0.14 0.14
PD f8.001 W 1.07 1.07 1.12
PPA (9) 8.07 0.10 0.10
PAM 0z) 22.7 29.4 29.4
RESULTANT PPV: tln/5aJ 0.1E
PEAK AIR PRESSURE: W0 133
(psi) e.01276
Tuesday, 8Q9/95 14:13105
DYNAMIC CALIERATIDN CHECK
L T U S
SHAKETABLE. CALIBRATED' 6.'14z95
By GaoSGnicz? Inc.
Sac 779, Warrendale, PA 15095
TEL[phone]
1ri Line file to dick ...
DIP EVT C --DATE-- --TIME-- TVPE SIZE
35 039 1 00/29/95 14113305 EVNT 1893E
TRIGGER ACTIVE. &'2V95 14116:01
1 EVENT ABOVE 0.03 1Wsec. 118 db
EXIT TRIGGERED, 8%25.195 14,19:45
4374 P01 _..._. .

SEP-25—'95 17:36 ID:VMC ELKIN IXIRRRY TEL NO:r /al76-2941 4375 P01
USSW'OSfIRE Repot i
Fraauan.v (hz)
r4

i
ll
III
II
it

II
ti
I
141
y :.
IF
a
4
_t
..
I

July 7, 1995
Mr, Tracy Davis
NC Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
DYNO NOBEL INC
400 Perimeter Center Terrace, #110
Atlanta, Georgia USA 30346
Telephone. [phone]
RECEIVED
DEHNR
I
LAND U.UALITY SEC. 1 ,__..._.I
Subject: Request for Deletion of Mining Permit Modification, Vulcan Materials
Company, Elkin Quarry.
Mr. Davis,
As a result of the earlier submittal from this office regarding a potentially high air blast reading
recorded at the Elkin, NC quarry on April 19, 1995, the state of North Carolina has issued a
modification to the mining permit for this operation. The basis of this modification is to require
all blasting operations to utilize the changes submitted by this office to reduce the unburdening of
back row holes adjacent to the secondary free face. The proposed changes basically consist of
initiation of shots from the open corner rather than the middle of the front row. The holes
adjacent to the secondary free face will be decked to minimize throw of muck material to the
bottom of the pit.
Since that submittal, documentation has been provided to the state showing that the recorded air
blast form April 19, 1995 was, indeed, well within the limits of the Elkin mining permit, In effect,
there was no violation. Given the above listed circumstances, there are several areas of concern
that we would like to bring to your attention.
As there was no violation, the modification to the mining permit would seem to be, in ofrect,
limiting the blasting operations at Elkin without cause_ The high air blast value provided by the
seismograph was reported, even though it was felt that the value was in error. This was
confirmed by analysis of the recorded data by Geosonics, Inc. The Elkin quarry acted in good
faith to report this incident prior to confirmation by Geosonics.
While the proposed changes to the blasting program at Elkin are being utilized for all highwall
shots, we have some reservations about restricting blast design options throughout the entire pit
to following the submitted plan. As the primary responsibility of the blaster is to design blasts that
are controlled, safe and, efficient, requiring all blasts to follow the submitted modifications may, in
Explosives

some instances, not be in keeping with accepted blasting theory. While such instances may be few
and far between, the blaster should be able to decide the safest way to design the blast..
Based on the above considerations, as well as our conversation of May 10, 1995, we respectfully
request that the modifications to the Elkin quarry mining permit be rescinded, with the
understanding that all blasting operations on the highwall will continue to utilize the design
modifications already approved by your or7ice.
Respectfully submitted,
Stuart Brashear, CSI, ISEE
Technical Service Representative
Dyno Nobel, Inc.
SCB/
cc* B. Graham, VMC
P. Dotson, VMC
T. Hendrix, VMC
S. Percy, PEI
R. Flinchum, DNI

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, MEMORANDUM
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES I�
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LW e N 0.(
CHARLES H. GARDNER
DIRECTOR
AND
STATE GE LOGIST M_
DATE
SUBJECT.
.�e...cCu' -�
Lw

,APR-?+0-1995 14:31 FROM ➢YNO NOBEL - CHLT,
NC TO 19197153060 P.01
From: Stuart Brashear
DYNO NOBEL, INC.
Questions? Call 704-588-4800
13914 Loch Loyal Drive
Fax [phone]
Charlottte, NC 28273
To: Tracy Davis
Company: NC Dept. HENR
,
Address:
Raleigh. NC
Date: April 20,1995
Time: 1:59 PM
Pages: 4 (rcluding this one)
Message:
Tracy,
Hard copy to follow.... Stu
�j�t>1 APR 211995
IYt v w 11 U
CRm) b3s-Iq-31 e�

,APR-20-1995 14:31 FROM DYNO NOBEL — CHLT, NC TO 191971530GA P.02
DYNO NOBEL INC
400 Pemntw Ce Eer Terrace, M110
Atlanm, Ceorgu USA 30346
T014phone: 4" 698 9472
Teletax: 404 699 9557
April 20, 1995
Mr. Tracy Davis
NC Department of Health, Environment and
Natural Resources
Raleigh, North Carolina
Subject: High Air Blast Value Recorded at Vulcan Materials Company - Elkin
Quarry. production Shot Nl on April 19, 1995.
Mr. Davis,
As required by the state of North Carolina, this office has investigated the circumstances
surrounding the high air blast recording associated with the first blast detonated at the Elkin
qua" on April 19, 1995. The findings of this investigation are presented for your review.
OVERVIEW
On April 20, 1995, this office visited the Vulcan Materials Company quarry in Elkin, North
Carolina. This was in response to the high air blast value recorded on April 19, 1995. During this
investigation, all available data relating to blasting activities on the 19th of April were reviewed by
Stuart Brashest, technical service representative for Dyno Nobel and Tim Hendrix, superintendent
for the Elkin quarry, As the seismograph that recorded the high air blast is of the type that
requires the interpretation of data stored on magnetic tape, the actual waveform associated with
the high au blast value is not currently available. with mis in mind, the following information has
been ascertained.
PROBABLE CAUSES OF HIGH AIR BLAST VALUE
The 131 dB reading recorded from the first production shot of 19 April, 1995 was recorded at a
location directly in front of the blast area. This would correspond with the location that would be
expected to have the highest potential air blast, namely, directly in front of the primary free face.
The unit that recorded this value was a SSU-3 Geosonics unit of tho type that records data on
magnetic tape for later analysis. This unit represents technology that is twenty years old and
while reliable, these older units can prove to be less reliable than newer hardware.
DYNO
Explosives

APR-20-1995 14:31 FROM DYNO NOBEL - CHLT, NC TO 19197153060 P.03
In an effort to determine the accuracy of the unit in question, a Series 2000-DK digital
seismograph, also manufactured by Geosonics, was deployed in a similar manner immediately
adjacent to the SSU-3 unit for the second shot of 19 April. For this blast, there was a 5 dB
discrepancy between the two units, with the SSU-3 unit reading higher than the 2000-DK unit
(117 dB versus 112 dB respectively), While some variation from unit to unit can be expected, a 5
;X... ..a .. Is �L, ;.J .�J aL — L _ It— _ _ I11 _1_ _ �
LLi7 vanitLLion 1s j191LLLll,..aILL, alsLL t1l Lllls Lase proVIUCU LILC 111arglrl UCLV MII a HU1111tLl 8110t arlu 1i11C
involving a violation of the mining permit for the Elkin quarry_
Ths tape from this particular blast has been sent to Geosonics with instructions to expedite the
analysis of the April 19 blast. In addition, this particular seismograph has been returned to
Geosonics for recalibration and/or repair.
While there is some cause for questioning the accuracy of the high air blast reading itself, the
actual shot performance was also reviewed for indications of conditions that would result in an
increase in air blast beyond nominal values for the particular shot design. In reviewing videotape
made from behind the blast in question, it is apparent that there is accelerated horizontal
movement of the second row along the secondary free face during detonation. There was no sign
of flyrock, but the movement of the muckpile associated with the second row on this end of the
blast showed an increased velocity compared to the movement of the remainder of the blast. Such
block motion and potential venting of explosive, gas could result in amplified air blast values
which, in association with a seismograph that may be reading high on the air blast channel, could
have caused the permit violation.
Shot initiation in this area of the pit is accomplished by opening the shot in the middle of the front
row even though there is a secondary free face providing an open comer. The rationale for this
has been an attempt to minimize the amount of material moving off the primary free face at an
angle and being heaved to the bottom of the pit, increasing the haul cost for recovering this
material for production. In such cases, it is possible that the initiation of the front row holes on
the open corner is reducing burden on the second row holes enough to increase block motion of
the second row muck, increasing the corresponding air blast associated with the blast_
- �.. r. �. r-r� rti r.... r..-.mr
1tCEMEDliATIOi�l TOLYlINDI 11Lr �A. GH A1K BBLASS1 P-00TU l IAL
In addition to insuring that the seismograph in question is accurately recording air blast
information, the shot design utilized at Elkin will be modified. Initiation will commence on the
open corner in a more traditional pattern, reducing the potential for unburdening the rear holes of
the open corner_ The corner holes will be decked to help provide the desired movement of the
muckpile perpendicular to the primary free face, minimizing the amount of material that must be
recovered from the bottom of the pit.
This modification to a standard initiation sequence should result in minimized air blast potential
for future blasting operations in this area.

APR-20-1995 14:32 FROM DYN4 NOBEL - CHLT, NC TO 19197153060 P.04
Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding the contents of this
report, please do not hesitate to contact n,e at once.
Respectful submitted,
Stuart Brashear CSI, ISEE
Technical Service Representative
Dyno Nobel, inc.
SCB/
cc,: T. Hendrix, VMC
P. Dotson, VMC
B. Graham, VMC
C. Henline, PEI
S. Percy, PEI
R. Flinchum, DM
TOTAL P.04

Cy�
@OSOrbfICS Inc., m.merly w+ Pa.a e$ 6R�Ixc.
/�/� r Bleat Remrtlirg Report
Clleal IILLA.J /!I/}IYAAIA'L� GO Dparadon oarere N.o.� 2 1
Adores r�/ iCK(u la A.r 7 / 11 LRaIO sh
OuarryA nihucnon❑ Olher Nona SEISMOGRAPH RECORDING DA T �� � k.
wapartyawnm /`GYA /,PYie Sluf M. Time //.3J Dare
Aoofam; ' 'A Exalt lowxono setamograpa CE'Al'%EQ &F IAMIN-
Saaaa pn Type .SUM M Na cal. Dau /-9 95 AotaR Sing 0{ AM. 99 4F
Dislanca d diracxM from diet( :Ill C Celpleffe No. GMNRange L0
Skated Dislarrce(seamwapa Iacono") 0parafor AG fia Winress
(,(d� SEISMOGRAMAMALMS
I canor Maximum M6&aurome Appficable fimaa Limit Source
(;I/A Imam. IISBM. Ncj
Vedkei CL'i 4 0.18 inbe 25 Vmrahm 1.00 in./sm. state Policy
Narpauum C.13 00055PMf
0aarpreasure 0.0012 psi (128 dBj state Policy
Tfanaa9rae _(1_-Q�.._ 0.06 iai Ana"I ram.•,,
Rama,*, /n/hX. o.m Akz

I
ICI
I
.P�1C n
iI �ii-T
%yLfQ-
I,I
_ p _p < I
Ile^", „' ! �- y "'� 7 07. mil ' i
�
I
E

�1
4I
iI
II
1
�
I
�1
11
I' I

n
i�
%�
II
_Yuv�1 �ruy��yy y� �9�dy 5�'KIt47 9g �//? LvW 3<llstvifd �M -�
A lHr1Y.++v tw J7 �5 + dN7 -ova wr `etup;p ' m
-VVW ark yp ml
m .4iWWVW) nranl Oro LIl
saa�rosi 51' 3+c�n f'N�¢1tat% �1tZ �°is aNLa'� ¢3'r1'nd J.»7L
yyfS aH`b5 r+4�13Q97'I' �2A& av a3 =Y�t3Y �di7�224'%�'S7 'i �NaKA"L-�73 M M1. X75
n
'
ia/t> �� I ''�# 4�y✓I �Y�40N 31-d1
I
i+^fi5'�W -'� (rpaoW S�v+ay�rj� 43m SilKrfi�P^i � _

I*ww a zs
C-fir)
I
II

LF
tot
el • '1 a
l
1
4';
it
� 1r
� 11
• f
+
111
I J

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON--SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
March 11, 1993
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Tony Sample
FROM: Doug Miller
RE: Elkin Quarry - VMC
Permit 86-03 Surry County
*49
04,,
We forsee no problems with the requrested revision if
conducted per appropriate land farming guidelines.
GDM/dh

NIIN• CHECKLIST FOR ROUA
company Project Name e�F/)Lp�; 6
Permit No. �86-03 County .5v, v�'r Date Received Z'27-fu
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central. Office and
Field office files and log in checks. -
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal lJ I4odification. ❑ Transfer - ❑ Release
❑
Additional
Information
Received
and
Attached
for Review
Please .route to:
LJ V✓,',usl'- S+rField Office
❑ Wildlife Resources commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed -a
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
suspense Date for Comments: .3 !/D'/_3 (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following:
*SDSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Ilow Copy to File Pink Copy. to Susan

r
u
February 19, 1993
Mr. Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Uul[an
Materials Company
Re: Modification of Permit No. 86-3
Elkin
Dear Mr. Davis:
•
a- % V � i-
e s F r it Si P n
FEB 2 2 !�,
I -AND QUALITY ZrTION
Enclosed are three complete sets of plans and the required
processing fee check transmitted as our application to modify the
above referenced permit. We would like to amend the existing permit
for a soil landfarming area (3.3 acres), which will be used for
landfarming of soils excavated from an underground storage tank
closure. Please note the disturbance in this area will be minimal
and this work will be finished in one week or less.
A copy of these plans has been submitted to the Groundwater section
and is awaiting sediment and erosion control approval. Therefore,
your earliest review and approval is requested.
Don't hesitate to should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
rN r.
C) �+
Jim Stroud
Geologist
Enclosure (Check No. 184653 for $100.00)
cc: Make Poplin
Phil Dotson
i iiu aacuui 1 x
Russ Willard
MIDEAST DIVISION 1 P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E..
William W. Cobey, Jr.', Secretary December 14, 1992 Director and State Geologist
Mr- J . R , RrvSon
Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
P.O. Box 4239
Winston—Salem, N.C. 27115-4239
RE; Permit No. 86-03
Elkin Quarry
Surry County
Dear Mr. Bryson:
Your recent request to have Mining Permit No. 86--03 for
Elkin Quarry in Surry County modified has been approved. The
modification is to construct a new overburden disposal area
including the associated sediment and erosion control measures as
indicated on the Elkin Mine Map dated October 12, 1992 and detail
sheet and supporting calculations dated October 12, 1992 and
October 8, 1992 respectively. A copy of the modified permit is
enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily
upon the initial application. Modifications were made as
indicated by the modification request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date,
mine name and permit number shall remain the same as before the
modification.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to
it does not supersede local zoning regulations. The
responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning
regulations lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 230.07
acres and the amount of land you are allowed to disturb at any
one time is 70 acres.
Geologkal Survey Section Land Quality Section
[phone] [phone]
Geodetic Survey Section
[phone]
PO, Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C- 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Bryson
December 14, 1992
Page 2
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at
[phone] should you have any question concerning this
matter.
Oacy
siinS�
DavisMinin�alist
Land quality Section
TED/ '1'LS
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Miller

DEPARTMENT O F ENV= RONMENT
H EALTH AN D NATURAL
RESOURCE S
D= V= S= ON (DIP LAND RESOURCE S
LAN D QUAL = TY S ECT 2 ON
P E R M = T --
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mininq Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry
Surry County - Permit No. 86-03
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: November 12, 2001

Page 2 of 12
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, -
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by -the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator,.provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or'
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
November 12, 1991: This permit has been modified to add
additional land contiguous to the existing permit area,
stockpile/overburden disposal areas, and the eastern pit
expansion/road relocation as specified by the revised Mine Map,
Details and Notes, and Emergency Spillway and Cross-section
sheets dated June 26, 1990 and revised September 12, 1991 with
stipulations.

Page 3 of 12
December 14, 1992: This permit has been modified to construct a
new overburden disposal area including the associated sediment
and erosion control measures as indicated on the Elkin Mine Map
dated October 12, 1992 and detail sheet and supporting
calculations dated October 12, 1992 and October 8, 1992,
respectively.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until November 12, 2001.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to
.N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
the provisions of the Mining Act,
the following conditions and
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be
in accordance with the permitting requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the
site shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission. It shall be
the permittee's responsibility to contact the Water
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management,
to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
2. Air Ouality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to
the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust
from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations
promulqated by the U.S. Army Corps of Enqineers.

Page 4 of 12
G!
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway to prevent
sedimentation of that waterway from erosion of the
affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse.
C. The buffer zones shown on the revised Mine Map received
by the Land Quality Section on September 24, 1991 shall
be maintained to prevent caving of any adjoining
property and to allow grading of the side slopes to the
required angle. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control
measures and earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed.
Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited
to diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt
check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or
ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment
from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into
any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to the
affected land.
C. The revised Mine Map, Details and Notes, and Emergency
Spillway and Cross -sections sheets dated June 26, 1990
and revised September 12, 1991 shall be followed with
the following stipulations:
(1) all rip -rap channels shall be undercut to allow
for proper placement of all filter stone and rip -
rap so as not to reduce the design capacities of
said channels;
(2) all areas at the site to be disturbed shall be
limited to those defined on the revised Mine Map
received by the Land Quality Section on September
24, 1991. All other areas shall be considered
natural bluffer zone areas and shall not he
disturbed until such time that a modification
request to disturb said areas has been submitted
to and approved by the Department;
(3) all sediment basins shall be cleaned out when they
become one-half (1/2) full of sediment and after
each significant rainfall event; and
(4) Class I and Class B rip -rap channels shall have
minimum stone liner thicknesses of 22 inches or 2
times the d50 stone size, whichever is greater.

Page 5 of 12
D. -The Mine Map and Details and Specifications, both dated
October 12, 1992, shall be followed with regard to the
proposed overburden disposal area modification. In
addition, the following stipulations apply:
(1) slope drains shall be utilized along the northeast
side of the first two terraces during construction
and unzll They have been permanently stabilized,
to properly convey run-off down slope. As an
alternative, said run-off can be diverted away
from the fill slope and towards diversions
installed in natural ground at the abutments of
said terraces;
(2) the elevation of the first terrace shall be 1000
feet rather than 1020 feet; --
(3) all fill slopes shall be surface roughened,
stabilized, seeded, mulched, and tacked_ on a -
weekly basis;
(4) the existing sediment pond northeast of the
proposed overburden disposal area shall be cleaned
out a minimum of every 6 months.
E. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be
submitted to the Department for approval prior to any
land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the
approved application for a mining permit and any
approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are
not limited to, expansion outside of the initial pit
area, creek crossings, or expansion of overburden
disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted as 0W1 through OW3 as
i nrii r.n�ori tin F'i nitro l l a1�arhorl 1 cha l l ha i nc�a l l orl anti
monitored as specified below.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into
consolidated rock and grouted to the surface. The
wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into
unweathered rock, whichever is deeper. The wells shall
be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits to construct these wells
shall be obtained from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.

Page 6 of 12
C. The observation wells shall be monitored twice a month
(bimonthly) at the same day and approximate time of day
for twelve (12) consecutive months following the
installation of the wells. The static water levels
shall be measured with an accuracy of plus or minus O.J.
foot and shall be referenced to a datum point and a
record of the water levels maintained. The bimonthly
precipitation and the volume of pit water discharge
shall also be recorded. Copies of these records shall
be provided to the Department on or about the'end of
each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may
be increased or decreased following the initial twelve
(12) month period as deemed appropriate by the
Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no
greater than the angle which can be.retained by
vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause offsite damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided,with groundcover, devices
or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any
expansions of the initial pit opening shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and
shall be stabilized within-60 days of completion.
Furthermore, a minimum ten (10) foot wide horizontal
safety bench shall be provided at the top of the rock
and at the toe of the overburden slope.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent
collection of pools of water that are, or likely to become,
noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage
r7i �-r+}1oc �r r+r�r�r7ii� �c ci��l 1 1-.o r.riric�riir+�oii �r i ncf-al 1 �r7 rehon
U14V11 t..J Vt VV1�U bL14wJ .J 11U11 JJ4 VV11wT 4L 1444�.0 VL .L 11�J 4V4 .L1444 .. 11411
required to prevent such conditions.
S. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
findings of any seismic studies conducted at this facility.
The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production
blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property
from thrown rock or vibrations:

Page 7 of 12
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter
otherwise provided, the maximum peak particle velocity
of any component of ground motion shall not exceed 1
inch per second at the immediate location of any
building outside of the permitted area regularly
occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or
institutional building outside of the permitted area.
The operator shall monitor each blast with a
seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels
linear (DBL) as measured at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building such as any dwelling
house, church, school, public building, or commercial
or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to
insure that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where
the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by the
operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the guarded area
or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department
immediately and further use of explosive at the site
shall be immediately suspended until the following
actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation
shall be provided to the Department within 10 days
of the incident. Said report shall, at a minimum,
document the cause(s) of the incident along with
technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the
Department before blasting may resume at the site.
iti .. l 1. 1-.. 7�... 4-.. .-. d- Fl • .-. 7�
'E al -Lure l.o take correct L V e 111ea.Z7 Ur R__C l.V pr e V e111.. 1 ly rovll
and repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a
violation of this permit.
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual
blast describing: the total number of holes; pattern
of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of
holes; type and total pounds of explosives; maximum
pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records
shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and
copies shall be provided to the Department upon
request.

Page 8 of 12
E. The operator
give 24 hour
prior to any
requested.
9. High_Wall Barrier
10.
11.
shall, when requested by the Department,
advance notice to the Land Quality Section
blast during a period for which notice is
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -
to -end or barbed wire fencing as indicated on the revised
Emergency Spillway and Cross --Sections sheet dated June 26,
1990 and revised September 1.2, 1991 shall be maintained at
all times around the perimeter of any highwall to prevent
inadvertent public access. In addition, a minimum 10 foot
wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the
junction between the top,.of.rock and the toe of the —
overburden cut slope.
Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the
mine and public thoroughfares to screen the operation
from the public. Additional screening methods, such as
constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms and appropriate tree plantings
�L_'11 L_ installed
_ 1 _ _L__ _ _L_ LL_
shall ue installed and maiintaineu as shown on he
revised Mine Map, Details and Notes, and Emergency
Spillway and Cross -Sections sheets dated June 26, 1990
and revised September 12, 1991.
Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the
desire to delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the
mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit
and any approved revisions to it. Approval to implement
such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse --Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
are generated outside of the mining permit area shall
be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
WA-_tP MAnAaPmPnt and the T.anrl Chiality Ri-r-tinn_
.--. ... �. ..-.. ...�. �.v .. -.. ..
Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.

Page 9 of 12
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that maybe considered hazardous
_ L_ l l L_ '_ _' _ f _' L L .'. t L_ _' t t_ 3
�iia�.x ue utspUseu Ui w��ii�ii Lice periiu��ecs area.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover
the operation as indicated on the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be
valid. The total affected Land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to -determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 1.0 of 12
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the
performance of which is a condition on the continuinq validity of
that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the
terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G._S._74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel
and other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle
as to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent
with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property
must be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration
which is in accordance with accepted conservation practices
and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or
remain on the mined area that are, likely to become noxious,
odious or foul.
5. The revegetation--'pl,an shall conform to accepted and
recommended narnnnmi r- and rPfnrPctat i nn nrA r.t i c-aq aG
established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to
the Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities
shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any
event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time
after completion or termination of mining on any segment of
the permit area and shall be completed within two years
after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule,
the planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry
excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any highwall, and grade and
revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 11 of 12
2.
The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a
surface suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden
or waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and
made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced;-subsoiled or
otherwise prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the
mine site. On -site disposal of waste shall be in
accordance with Operating Condition 12A and B.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the
collection of noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according
to the Revegetation Plan approved in the renewal application
by Mr Ri r•hnrrl RX70rhar-t ni ctri rt rnncrzrvat i nn i ct c4ni l
Conservation Service, on December 19, 1990 with the
following additions as per the N.G. Wildlife Resources
Commission:
Early Spring: Switchgrass 8 lbs./acre
VA 70 shrub lespedeza 20 lbs./acre
Fall: Orchard grass 18 lbs./acre
White clover 5 lbs./acre

Page 12 of 12
Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to
the extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be
initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be
completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued September 27, 1972, renewed September
27, 1982 and contemporaneously renewed and modified November
12, 1991, is hereby modified this 14th day of December, 1992
pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
By: 4i� � N� / _Q
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources _
By Authority of the Secretary
of 4hc nonar+mon+ of Fnwirnnmcnf Ffca l7-h Ana matn�Al uccnn.roc

��(rU/(!Ki 2 Mo 7�i'an�rJ(r G -*�
:��r :l-thP (•'ow1.; otv z,
Pl-Mf �GaInt\tt)
Ia o \
io 5 e
- I ' 1
\
H F1.09
5
v
/ ,
,II
II C
))
\
PI LE
(j
It
St
It
it
it
t ! i
ofir
tz
11 A
�v
r
pp
\
950
T
i
5�' ITV A
1
�tlll ill
It
L,ur
lllit
(�ry
yl�
p
Nii$, sir 05
E9>^fi0
:1
11 1
t
N&v
1 � 1
v
✓��IQ
ay.�
1:1
, r
I I I I

Salo �
.aP 04
Y.v
aA
n
rnrw
1*4

I'
�.
f
/
v
/
�'.�
�
�
1
y
is
f�,
t'�
y
.:
'
�'
i �
�/~
� � �
I
�,
._
'i
..
_
✓ i
I'
r -�-�
..

M EN OO
0
DATE- I L � 1% fa
SUBJECT: E�'t'Nl ©�•°""+
A eao� a�da�J /6,sr,
is ✓� -a
^ �
It'S.y A&Y�5 ,N raPa
-'T Z4 f,lpy Y4, Pod �ffd.�Yz
�/a�.led LCI, 7SL D%
From
�SfAiF •,
North Carolina Department of Environment
i�. Health, and Natural Resources ep
MUCW 111�

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, /1
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE �?
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
November 10, 1992 P(/ j 6Y FIl
M EM GRAM D UM `scnCT
TO: Tony Sample
FROM: Doug Miller
RE: Elkin Quarry - VMC
#86-03
Review of the submittal for the referenced quarry raises
the following questions:
(1) What is being done? No cover letter is provided nor
do any maps outline the changes being requested.
(2) The sediment pond needs to be re-evaluated for the
increased disturbed area noted on the plan. Will it
still be adequate?
(3) The scale of the map is so large that it is difficult
to evaluate exactly what is proposed where. With the
amount of water that the pipes are to carry, how are
inlets to be done and how will thrust be handled at
prnpnced tnrnc�
(4) Specific directions on placement of spoil so as to get
minimal erosion should be provided and is not. Are
they going to install pipe and channels as they go up
front or in the end? This should be spelled out.
(5) Exactly how did they arrive at the denuded acreage
etc. This should be spelled out on plan.
(6) How is top of pile to be graded for drainage? This
could effect adequacy of slope drains.
Plans have been forwarded to DEM.CA,y/,i%..c�l
GDM/dh

P.1
! 'NO MP JB4 `C8y50d1a Trti2
FBXTra Isminai memo �s>�` 1 z u 9z 2 rP PM
� ..._ ,. .... ..... .From "�i
ME_. TO.aY SAMPt� �CFF J((�oQDY /
Company _ .. __.. .., Cwnpan .v' ... ....
IleNGn6Nr{R �s xy,W,v ixws Cau.au, Kr.�
Laela _. .. wvavon Dept C wga ....Z . . _..._
T2n�Glmq, JL, jCAN¢yPO�....
PoaA Te!eph n¢a Fax �Tnkpnpne� a ... _ . nalle6A.b 7s.8-15 5
romanis � Orginal ❑oeurcr �Bnwm �CJlly gaup
sEo,ms rr .voti� "A%)
d.
v,olack �S:1,Klh1..._rS'itm2Li'�.— No: 42x_�°s-. J� alley, Williams, Calloway SS wing
consulting artntors
¢al Down mprn "P. n. bm 1]4n
or ln: �.G-_II�`)2 FaG. —�M—�- kannaooll., normh r�re,.�rna snonz pool wall-ura
':JEV.�aN Ew1T Qo.ir "A" �lo�•eP Pour]
ASnxA It IOx0.09_.SE I ...
C4)( H)(SAi
(0. w) C912 100,000
Soo C.F /
SE71nEn' G�rWA4F rCcQUlLC� Ile ZjOniTOJAI C%LERAurenP.l
P, Voti.= i(a,S AC,e. 18004E A.CAAZ ' 0?),700 C-r- '� 3fe, 800,. rLOYIOEp
:. t�uciti Gn i�AUD G A7Plr,orJa%e. Srrwft* JT Lo�DiNt&
=Ro >v. oveeBu 2vEu Z�fi,PoSa� iJRGI�
el

- o 0
x I N E S I T E R E V I E W
.r 'ROUTING'TO DEN -- .
project+'Name �►11G : ELIGiy' �JA22� ..
Referred to, Larry. Coble
Date
Return to- Land Quality by .II IIe%_2-
rc+.ny
_.Air QualityCommeate"
+Completed T�/^�V//�
Commenta'attached ,:':fI�
V
Ground: Water Comments :r t+-
r - �COmPl@tedTi,+4-4
c.
Comments Attached
Water,,Quality~.- Attached Sheet,
A,�.VEb

u
MINE SITE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: I11AIl4/7
Due: Assigned to: �� Completed
Approved by Larry Coble -
Steve Mauney ,
REVIEW ISSUES:
Vnfn�chuA'/C«vo�m Wnm, nii.'Rl
.Comments �j' ��ny /q�'�rS //F'sO�iir�/S!iY Zio./:S_
i
*jPERMITS: ..
„ �.cua.,� ream cqu
Yes No
NPDES Permit Existing/Proposed No. '
Non Discharge Permit.;Required
.. Yes ._-NO
Non Discharge. Permit Existing/Proposed No..
:.� comments , �" r r ' O ��"`- �M/• `
ENVIRONMENTAL
Wetlands Distur_bed.by Activity
Yes No
401 Certification Required• -
Yes
'Comment.,.,_ -•F.:e^� .4-�,:, .x. ✓wa+6,.;-..,:=¢.;_

REMI
State of North Carolin.
Department of Environment, Health, and
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor October 20, 1992
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
To: Ms. Stephanie Goudreau
Habitat Conservation Program
Wildlife Resources Commission
From: Susan B. Edwards _��
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Re:
Mining Permit Modification Re
Elkins Quarry - Permit No. 86-03,,
Sorry County'
NOY 12
Charles H. Gardner' PG' PE_
Director and State Geologist
Please find attar__hed for your review a copy of the mining permit
modification request for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries
(G. S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by November 13, 1992 so that we may
complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals
and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and
sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain
erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be
greatly appreciated. if your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it
is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up
a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
greatly appreciated. Please contact Mr. Tony Sample at [phone] if you
have any questions.
SHE
Attachments
cc: Mr. Doug Miller
Geoloeial Survey $ecdm land Quality Section Gwdedc Sury Smoon
[phone] (919) 7334574 [phone]
i\
on 9k, pw . oWi_�". , NC. 276117687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oppomany ARirmauw Aaron Emplo r

o •
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company 1/Jem 171&A• ,-P (o Project Name Ve Ns
Permit No. f t -o3 County S51 y Date Received /n-ih�-wz-
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and �loJgg in checks.
* ❑ New ElRenewalL✓J Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information Received and Attached for Review
Please route to:
�
❑ W„s'+*- 54'�v- Field office Date Routed /o-a/-4a�t
LJ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed An -,;2
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
2 other: 17 ZF-M ����- '�'�^, = ° �-�' j Date Routed
Suspense Date for comments: (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make fileandreturn Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Allow Copy to File Pink Copy to Susan

project: VMC- ELKIN VOTZYNo: gZ5,53
Sublecc Ezf5fCrJ ' rrlogc
alley, NI 5, carmen, & n9
consulting engineers
207 south Resin street P. a. be 1 ss8
kaneapolls. Ranh "retire 28082 (104) 9 38-15 15
Oale: /� - �- �L Re /'/1!%IJ
p
DIrcH P40. l¢ _
jDrAir0GE. AEEP-=
DENUDeb Aei=a = 1, Z:ac
..
LAND USc Ap-[A ..
�
`A�ObS I.S
0.35
Z
I' 9
Va:C-FLK;N QUAR6:'
r_Hn!aNc:L TYP!::
❑F.ASS-LLNED TRAPEZOIDAL
Xi DIARY OF DA9'A
N) MANN.ING'S ROI!GHNESS COF'.P. _
z) AVERAGE SIDF SLOPE
W) WIDTH, OF CHANNEL POTTOiI =
S) CHANNEL SLOPE _
D) NORMAL DEPTH OF FLOin' -
WP) WETTED PERIME'TFN
A)-CROSSECTIONAL AREA =
R) HYDRAULIC RADIUS =
Q) DESIGN FLOW (QUAN'PIT-0 _
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY =
T) SHEAR STRESS
VR) V x R <GRASS ONLY> -
- LYE
D .OdRO.
O:L
?.LID FIT
I .OD %
1.01 F'1'. u- 2.0
ti..`;0 FT.
4.04 FT.
0.62 FT.
10. 34 CPS
2.56 FPS �''` rem¢ urvN•H!
0.63 LBS/FT2
1.59 FT2/SEC
CPFzr- FOP APVRotRrE TEMP.

Project: `rAc- ELr;U lOvf.a No: 9 r3
Subject:./e%N „`, ,F,, J
alley, w ms, carmen, ft king
con3ulting enginee ra
201 south orals street p. o. eae 12aB
kannaoolis, north urellns 2e0e2 pool eaen 313
Date: y-0 Rep- MPll
b f!a 14 —.Ttrn Lvdir)E,
ViMC-ELFIN QUARRY
CRAM'+EL TYPE:
STRAW AND TACK TEMP. Li NNi NG
SUMMARY OF DATA
N)
MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEF.
= 0,0650
Z)
AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE
= 2.0:1
Wj
WIDTH OF CHe1NNHLT'C('1i9
= 2.00
H.
S)
CHANNEL SLOPE
= 1.00
'I
D)
NORMAL DEPTH OF FLOW
= 1.01
FT.
WP)
WET'CED P"", ti!IC':'EN
= 6.50
A)
CROSSE'CTI6NAL AREA.
- 6.04
FT
R)
HYDRN;LI(:.001US
= 0.62
F,.
Q)
DESIGN FLOIi )QUANTITY)
- 7.63
CPS
V)-AVP:°dG1:
ELCC7'fY
- 1.89
FPS
"!
SHFAR STRESS
= 0.65
i; 95i FT2
V"I')
V 'e ;q ASS ONLY".
..
i 7
; _.. °.EC
$-'.E9C_
;jT.cS° `/'.. L•F )%('-�11 - -c;
NHN
irE IiLL .Tni::-�

Project;M�LOA No: oalley,wi
Subject:
ms, carmen, & king consulting englneers
RO) caulk mein sheet P. o. box 114e
kennep911e nartkramllns29091 1704)9]8.1013
Dale: Rep.
—JILL
GEAINAGE AREA. 50-ACRES i_._
1
_.
i
_
.. iDe"ODep RRtR
UPr
I-vJocfi 4 O o 35 . ! i.._ / 40 .... _
l
-' _...._ `
:
T.=.._
1
:
1
�T�P.-:.D91(/�.5,C5.) 13.33.CF5
1
C Qc.�tD
J:[,7p.0 JJ_.. f Qj)1>L,'
:
%� /r}, PE DEAi/J5
I
' V IC ELRIN QUARRY -
. _ .. ,. TRAPTYPE' TRAPEZOIDAL (P. 6,S0 P1
..__ 1 FTj
1.LINIAG
L
SUMMARY ..,orF DATA
j
. - ....
= 0 D440-_ .....
N) MANNINGS ROUGH ..
ROUGHNESS COEF
i^
'
_......_
Z)1 AVERAGE SIDE'SLOPE j-=' 2 0 1 j-
- W)'-WIDTH ''OFICHANNEL BOTTOM = 5.004T.
�
..... S)-CHANNEL SLOP1 00. %. j...
). PTN ,OFFLOW 1 73 T. _ ' = F. H 3 0
DHORMAG DEWP)_iWETTED
PERIMETER - 12 74
FT.
A)' CROSSECTIONAL AREA = 14 63
FD.
j
- R)-HYDRAULIC RADIUS--. I - 1 15 FT'.-
-
FLF.F1tl1S
Q) DESIGN FLOW (QUANTITY)
..VELOCITY
1
5
RESS
T)SHEARS
R(GRAS50NLi4.51'S$
FT2/SEC
5AEA?-smY� 1.09Ib�Ft'� SHEAR_STQE55
:�6YX+I�51jjlG
l
.25.01S�Z4"
D&51(5r1 15 A>WYATE

Project: yMC-ELK1N No: 9253
alley, wifffins, carmen, 6 kin g
consulting Ongln sir!
SVOjBCI:
0¢I¢: flep.
207 south min street P. 0. box 1248
88nnepslls, north oerollns 28002 [phone]
t.o
{ DRA NAbE 444A 10D k -S_ —_ __-_ $ )Z M/N ._

Project C- E a v NO: Q�3
Subject: �lia DeS164
alley, wi ms, carmen, Q king
consulting engineers
zo2.aetn man .o-..t P. a. box tzae
kann.pell., node urollna 28082 posl B]8-tSta Ed
Dale: ID- 9-9Z nap. MDS
PIPE _ AT 6VE UJ2llEyJ _I>ISPOS/}L R2EA ._
I i .
'..AT 17%
30" GnF 'I. FLOYJFou @ i19o:. W!c� CA 57.94dF) 7l, zq/5 o;
r
I
_Torti, CNe z 9 A (.
FcbvJ -'F>wM ESQ
I
c'MP F�ovVin d Fu ® 390
.. l _ bt/ict- CARKY = .�, Z C�5 � Z.,9 CFS .', oK
IN5TAL� 4.' -3d V IZ" TTEi�6 AT .,EACH i3ENCN TO PIgG UP FLp u). :.
FBNdJe3 WtLL 5LaPE TOUJMRD i.7W .30'I'CMP-

e
October, 13 1992
Mr. Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Vulcan
Materials Company
Re: Modification of Permit No. 86-3
Elkin Quarry
Dear Mr. Davis:
U6II C 40
�� P�q�7Tys,�
SFCT7�N
Enclosed are three complete sets of plans and the required processing
fee check transmitted as our application to modify the above referenced
permit. We would like to amend the existing permit for an overburden
disposal area, which will be used over the next 10 years to place strippings
coming from the quarry area.
Betd'u i'e time i3 tri LILGI 60 thia work, your earnest review and approval
is requested.
Should you have any questions or require additional information in the
above matter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
JBryson
Designer
Enclosure (Check No. 178714 for $250.00)
cc: Russ Willard
Mike Poplin
Phil Dotson
Tim Hendrix
MIDEAST DIVISION I P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM. NORTH CAROLINA 271154239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

N011035 A11100 ONVI
019 l 130
03A13318
•
L

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources .
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor - I Charles H. Gardner
NNIUam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary November, 12, 1991 - Director
Mr. Mike Poplin, Environmental Engineer
Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
P. 0. Box 4239
Winston-Salem, INC 27115-4239
RE: Permit No. 86-03
Elkin Quarry,
Surry County
Dear Mr. Poplin:
Your recent request to have Mining Permit No. 86-03 for the Elkin Quarry
in Surry County contemporaneously renewed and modified has been approved as
per the revised Mine Map, Details and Notes, and Emergency Spillway and
Cross -Sections sheets dated June 26, 1990 and revised September 12, 1991 with
stipulations. A copy of the renewed and modified permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the renewed and modified permit were based primarily
upon the initial application. Modifications were made as indicated by the
renewal and modification requests and as required to insure compliance with
The Mining Act of 1971. The mine name and permit number shall remain the same
as before the renewal and modification. The new expiration date is November
12. 2001.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification or renewal of it
does not supercede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance
with any applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
Please review the renewed and modified permit and advise this office at
[phone] should you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
ir3cy E Davis, E.I.T.
Mining ecialist
Land Quality Section
TED/se
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
P.O. Box 27687 • Melgh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Am,mative Action Employer

t
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
n�.n! rry rr nT rnn!
LAND q Mai i r )ruz lull
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC
5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry
Surry County - Permit No. 86-03
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration

Page 2 of 10
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved
Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the -protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation,,secured by the'bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with -the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, tfle
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that both
operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the
successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference
to reclamation'of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and
conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and
requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written
notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
;-„ thn Reclamation plan ac inrornnratad in the hermit. The operator shall
mod r.., r
have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed
modification, revocation or'suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in
addition to the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures
authorized by law.
nafinitinns
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining
Act, N.C.O.S. 74-49,
Modifications
November 12, 1991: This permit has been modified to add additional land
contiguous to the existing permit area, stockpile/overburden disposal areas,
and the eastern pit expansion/road relocation as specified by the revised Mine
Map, Details and Notes, and Emergency Spillway and Cross -Section sheets dated
,tune 26, 1990 and revised September 12, 1991 with stipulations.
Expiration Date.
This permit shall be.effective from the date of its issuance until November
12, 2001.

Page 3 of 10
•('nnriitinnc
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S.
74-46, et..seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with
the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
2. .Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions
including fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means that may be
necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the
,permitted area.
3. Puffer Zones
A. . Any mining activity affecting wetlands shall be.,in accordance with
the requirements and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
o ' ff, + buffer shall hn ma11— intainorrl hafwaan any aff•artarf land anri
any adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from
erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse.
C. The buffer zones shown on the revised Mine Map received by the Land
Quality Section on September 24, 1991 shall be maintained to prevent
caving of any adjoining property and to allow grading of the side
slopes to the required angle. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and
earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. The operator shall notify the Winston-Salem Regional Office, Land
Quality Section, at least 48 hours prior to beginning any of the
initial land disturbing activities in the new stockpile/overburden
disposal areas and eastern pit expansion/road relocation area as
indicated by the revised Mine Map, Details and Notes, and Emergency
Spillway and Cross -Sections sheets dated June 26, 1990 and revised
September 12, 1991.

5.
Page 4 of 10
B. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to
diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check darns, spit
retarding structure.s,.rip-rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any
lake or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
C. The revised Mine Map, Details and Notes, and.Emergency Spillway and
Cross -Sections sheets dated June 26, 1990 and revised September 12,
1991 shall be followed with the following stipulations:
(1) all rip -rap channels shall be undercut to allow for proper
placement of all filter stone and rip -rap so as not to reduce
the designed capacities of said channels;
(2) all areas at the site to be disturbed shall be limited to those
defined on the revised Mine Map received by the Land Quality
Section on September 24, 1991, All other areas shall be
considered natural buffer zone areas and shall not be disturbed
until such time that a modification request to disturb said
areas has been submitted to and approved by the Department;
(3) all sediment basins shall be cleaned out when they become
one-half (112) full of sediment and after each significant
rainfall event; and
(4) Class I and Class B rip -rap channels shall have minimum stone
liner thicknesses of 22 inches or 2 times the dry stone size,
whichever is greater.
D. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the
Department for approval prior to any land disturbing activities not
indicated in the revised information noted above. Such areas
include, but are not limited to, expansion outside of the approved
pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of approved overburden
disposal areas.
Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted as DWI through OW3 as indicated on
Figure 1 (attached) shall be installed and monitored as specified
below.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated
rnck and ornr,ted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be
extended at least 50 feet below static water level, or at least 50
feet into unweathered rock, whichever is deeper. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The necessary
permits to construct these wells shall be obtained from the I.C.
Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater.Section.

Page 5 of 10
C. The observation wells shall be monitored twice a month (bimonthly)
at the same day and approximate time of day for twelve (12)
consecutive months following the installation of the wells. The
static water levels shall be measured with an accuracy of plus or
minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a atum point and a record
of the water levels maintained. The bimonthly precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of
these records shall.be provided to the Department on or about the
end of each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may be
increased or decreased following the initial twelve (12) month
period as deemed appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
n Tr_ _ i r..... .J,,a 1 .J F- l l L.., l l 1--e greater
+'-.n the
H. I ne angle for graded slopes anu 1 1 1 1 s shall I lu no gr ea LCI 1,11 rl LI}C
angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate
erosion control measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause
offsite damage because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain
such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any expansions of the
initial pit opening shall be graded to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized within 60 days of
completion. Furthermore, a minimum ten (10) foot wide horizontal
safety bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe
of the overburden slope.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of
water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the -Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at this facility. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrations:

Page 6 of 10
A. In'all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise
provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of
ground motion shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the immediate
location of any building outside of the permitted area regularly
occupied by human beings such as dwelling house, church, school,
public building, or.commercial or institutional building outside -of.
the permitted area. The operator shall monitor each blast with a
seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear (dBL) as
measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied building
outside of the permit area such as any dwelling house, church,
school, public building, or commercial or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that
flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or
permanently guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the
guarded area or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department immediately and
further use of explosive at the site shall be immediately suspended
until the -following actions have been taken:
A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall
be conducted.
�. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation shall be
provided to the Department within 10 days of the incident. Said
report shall; at a minimum, document the cause(s) of the
incident along with technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the Department before
blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take.corrective measures
to prevent flyrock and repeated instances of flyrock shall be
considered a violation of this permit.
D The `nperatnr chill mainfain rernrds nn each indivld"al blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of
intervals; depth and size of. holes; type and total pounds of
explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; -and blast location. Records shall be maintained
at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour
advance +; +o thee Land, Qualify Cortinn prinr fn Anv hla�t during a
a'uvai��c rw�irc �� Land,
period for which notice is requested.

9. High Wall Barrier
10,
11
12,
Wage 7 of 10
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to --end or
barbed wire fencing as indicated on the revised Emergency Spillway and
Cross -Sections sheet dated June 26, 1990 and revised September 12, 1991
shall be maintained at all times around -the perimeter of any highwall.to
prevent inadvertent public access. 1n addition, a minimOm 10 foot wide
horizontal safety- bench shall be provided at the junction between the top
of rock and the toe of the overburden cut slope.
Visual Screenin
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional
screening methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be
employed as deemed appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms and appropriate tree plantings shall he
installed and maintained as shown on the revised Mine Map, Details
and Notes, and Emergency Spillway and Cross -Sections sheets dated
June 26, 1990 and revised September 12, 1991,
Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to
delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or
erosion/sediment control plan contained in the approved application for a
mining permit. Approval to implement such'changes must be obtained from
the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other Soler waste that are, generated
outside of the mining permit area shall be allowed within the
boundaries of the mining permit area unless authorization to conduct
said disposal has first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste management and the Land Quality Section, Department of
Environment, Health,and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with -the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74--49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on --site and directly associated with the mining activity may
be disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of
Solid Waste Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or
their ctnragP containers or any other material that maybe considered
hazardous shall be disposed of within the permitted area.

Page 8 of 10
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G-.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated
on the approved application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeoio icai Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources.

Page 9 of 10
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which
is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally,'
the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues
beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and -other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the
possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided
in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for
the proposed subsequent use of the land.-
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined
area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic
and reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina
Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation
Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to
the time schedule .included in the plan, which shall to the extent.feasible
provide reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any event,
provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time after completion or
termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and shall be
completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned
reclamation shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water,
provide a permanent barricade (fence) along the top of any highwall, and
grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable
r �� i a + r11C0 are a5 follows:
I o the p 1 an e�J 1 u tip¢ t.o use .
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles
shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and
terraced as necessary to insure slope stability.

Page 1.0 of 10
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled,
graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake
areas.
C. The processing, stockpile; and other disturbed areas neighboring the
wi l tie exc,a'va t Ion shall l be I evel ed and silioothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared
before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be. permanently disposed of at the mine site.
On -site disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating
Condition 12A and B.
F.. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
3. Reve etation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the
Revegetation Plan approved in the renewal application by Mr. Richard
Everhart, District Conservationist, Soil Conservation.Service, on
December 19, 1990 with the followina additions as per the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission:
Early Spring: Switchgrass 8 lbs./acre
VA 70 shrub lespedeza 20 lbs./acre
Fall: Orchard grass 18 lbs,/acre
White clover 5 lbs./acre
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent
feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible
after completion or termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final re4l [ililfli—,i—1 ,, 4 , weinyin iinn,.hall be rrmnrlpprwithin twnLIV11111�l4vi `j years of completion or termination of mining.
This permit, issued September 27, 1972 and renewed September 27, 1982, is
hereby contemporaneously renewed and modified this 12th day of November,
1991 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department.of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

k(lru l� 1 NON.r, a �rus fy is xLn leNIP r� w~ aW 3, ON z t ow s�
V��_(-�� ul�Tei���✓.h.loHaMNy ..._�,+.��� Uw�.v�t w.
I E 10,80zw I r-
r
It
—r-- E
IN
Nil
1 hel..l _ IA'tea.A � -1c vti l i ji. _
}
\
Xi .v I ��_ I ���� ill I�._� I�,vI• II P,�I sIf
y�:•.
I NII�A105 F
E6 0 .6.�/
��.._ I,/It �
,IN
I�
�l1n;L�
�LE
\ r1 1`I 1 ;, i\ �\ , r. i %, 1Ir} I :C
J{ a I� J I I'
/ \5
I

1NG CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
J company � �}(�> Project Name 946 A, 61jnt9
U
Permit No. /1'�'�� county_ Date Received !�
Reviewer / _!-li� �iN,.Pii
Please makecopies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ modification ❑
dditicnal Information ❑ Fee N
❑ Fee Received: Amount
Please route to:
1'Ll 4C� Field Office
❑ wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
edecn't
NOV 2 6 10
I LAND QOALITY
Date —Routed I7—;l.)—C)
,4�
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: &-rily (Date received +30 days, .
not
on weekend)
,�.J Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return checklist and file to Reviewer

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone Log
[)are:— 12J—LJ-2_v shat of
Timegam Call: Placed Received ❑
❑ Pm ) Returned ❑
1. Project: VMtli' CM'tl� .�a�''MY'!v 16� �7) l.r^•�"„' COunt): g
2. Conversation with: G�� Telephonc:yf`q)-gi'T'/
(4i
3. Affiliation'.
M7 p
% n I .•'/. / / � � 'i, it / i ��
�I 1,Lr�r

r
Uul[nn
Materials Company
March 6, 1992t t � I �-D)
0 9 0Z
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
N.C. D.E.H.N.R.
Land Quality Section
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611--7687
Re: Permit No. 86-03
Elkin Quarry
Surry County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Davis:
Enclosed is a map section showing the location of three (3) planned
observation wells at the above location. Each well will be drilled
a minimum depth of two hundred feet.
If you have reservations or questions concerning this activity,
please feel free to call immediately.
rely,
Joe Gutierrez
Chief Geologist
/ib
enc.
MICEAST DIVISION 1 P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

APEA =
6 PEPR WIT)I WHITE PINE LIEES, IIII
"POW Tµ AND 9',I16II 5AFETY FENCE FWI
SCNEENINC.
I
T
,1 I
Wi, I
EENIY \ M I&CAN 1
LEAS Eo 61 vvc I
Nnr/,E EiuroFtt
!MANENT PITCH No. 12
IS 14' THICK W/
7F967 FILTER /
STPNEF
\I III '� V_����,�/1 f/ { \•
,9/ a .. I I a-� i U.
.
i
E IIorrb0111/\i I
Uv H �4hi1` II
ti MI -Imo-
1

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone Log
Datc:��J-r r�a� Sheet of_
Time: 75� ❑ am Call: Placed 0 Received ❑
Opnt Returned ❑
2. Conversation
3. Affiliation:
4. Content
IAM
I i /
FM �M�021
�WWA�WAWWHJ PAT

I..
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural ResoALCOVE®
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section oI 4 -Z 1991
Telephone Log LAMO QUALITY SIVION
Date Sheet—LOC-1—
Time: CP'00 D an Call: Placed 0 Received 0
m
V... Returned 9�
1. Project Eat;m A 14" County:
2. Conversation with: ""94 WeQA& ----Telephow &I -as
3. Affiliation:
4. Content of cenversigion: lVq�4- p&YA*c,
IUAAAI Welq 1 0 4A0 Qj4dA44 tZeAle, WIdgelaLeO
caajo; &Vika /(/A
i It ]A . . . I �. A , 11
MOIL
OWN
7
Ak
41J
a-

��� .. �.
. , i'u

Jtate of North l arolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Reso�irces l
James G. Martin, Governor May 1, 1992 Charles H. Gardner, P-G., P.E..
William a W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary ]Director nd State Geologist
Mr. Jeff Combs
Route 3, Box 464
Elkin, North Carolina 28621
RE: Vulcan Materials Company's
Elkin Quarry
Mining Permit No. 86-03
Surry County
Dear Mr. Combs:
This letter is in response to your letter to me, received in
this office on April 10, 1992, concerning the above referenced
operation.
Your concerns regarding the stoppage of flow in the "creek"
located behind your parents' }soma a' }e-1 a +- A---
j t-, I nlil Vac 'L .rj iiilllleUla L. _L aU jal.en L. UU
the above operation) was investigated shortly after our meeting in
my office on July 31, 1991. In my letter to Vulcan Materials
Company dated August 6, 1991 concerning their renewal and
modification of Mining Permit No. 86-03, I noted the following:
"This office has been recently advised that flow has been cut
off in the creek (branch) that runs along the eastern mine
permit boundary and that it has been diverted into the pit.
Has your company plugged or relocated/diverted said creek?
Please address this issue."
In written correspondence dated September 23, 1991 in response
to my letter, Vulcan Materials Company stated the followinq:
"Your office has received erroneous information concerning the
drainage draw along the eastern mine permit boundary. We have
not plugged or relocated/diverted said drainage. The USGS
quad map for this area shows this feature to be a 'non -blue
line', wet --weather draw. Past and proposed mining activities
will not adversely impact same."
Gcululdcal 5urve-v 5cction Land QualitV SeCUon Gccxictic survey, `CCl;on
(919) 733-2.i23 (919) 733--157.1 [phone]
PO l;ox 27687 • ikalcigh, NIC_. 27611-7687 • Trlcplionc (y1O) 733 38.33
An f c;ual Oppi rruniz-v Aflirit;arivc Action I:mpLwrr'

609
1 v1
Mr. Combs
May 1, 1992
Page 2
This office has reviewed the above statement and the -USGS quad
map and concurs that the draw is indicated as a "wet -weather draw"
that only has flow Clurin fa i_
r a.uo �..c�w uu1111y rainfall- CV�IIi.� (I1C] perennial Stream Or
spring has been indicated). If the draw appeared to have had
regular flow at one time that has now been reduced, there may be a
possibility that another source directly upstream, rather than the
Vulcan operation, that may be the cause of such perceived
fluctuations.
If you still have concerns that this draw is being impacted by
the quarry operation, please contact Mr. Doug Miller, Winston-Salem
Regional Engineer, at [phone] for a site investigation of
said draw. Please be advised that Vulcan is required, in its
mining permit conditions, to install and monitor groundwater
observation wells around the perimeter of the excavation (one is
located on the southeast side of the excavation between the
excavation and the draw) . If you would like to review the mine
file further, please contact Mr. Miller to set up a mutually
convenient date and time.
Thank you for your interest in this matter. if you should
have any questions regarding the above, please contact me at (919)
733-4574.
F1
TED\td
cc: Mr. Douq Miller
Sinc rely,
J
Tracy . Davis, E.I.T.
Minin Specialist
Land Quality Section

JEFF COMBS
Rt. 3, Box 464
ELKIN, N.C. 28621
Ate,.
V
Air- 10 1992 Mr. Tracy Davis �-AkD �Uq
Land Quality Section LIT
P. O. Box 27687 YSFvTlQ1V
Raleigh, N. C. 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Davis,
G
I was in your office in 1991 with Mr. Dewey York. We were
there discussing Vulcan Materials permit to operate their
Quarry in Elkin, and some of the problems we are having
there. One of the problems we discussed was a creek behind
my parents home. This was a good size creek when I was a
child. We had a water -hole there that we played in and
used to water our livestock. We want to fence this pro-
perty in to pasture cattle, but have discovered that the
creek has stopped flowing. This creek is the property line
between Vulcan Material's property and my parents property.
During our conversation you told me your office would in-
vestigate this. I left my name, address, and phone number
with you, but have not heard from you. Would you please let
me know what you have found in your investigation.
Sincerely yours,
Jeff Combs

p����/
111Wt--
s �
H�
31
or
�Iyn''��1
Pi
e
`
t tWIN
rr
I
1 I
tt
cs 3 i ,� I
�22 90 '066 r A4 3
`
P 1
re uzz a
SQ1(C.'b�N
' CI OtlY�I
3/ f` 1
� 1
�
r
a
Sy�
�
. .Nj
'fl..
o
�`—
\
PooVI I
I
i
IN
}}I
_
oe,ZQ94oj3
_
OBIP
-VA
S'n'
J�1rl rW7'I�I
:I
(may MO Z MO a,4 'F i
//
id

]4.rr
Ik
1'
r
'lk,311
16 IF it
001
09
11 It
ii� le
IiK
11
] 4�
\vI\III
CIot
d'I I2211 I
1
I
�i.
I \ .I s0 yesnNI
rasa-
�I� ��.rl �I y
°
l-
i
`.
ipp
��I�'G
/`�
•`\ �\V�...\III
i
\.Vkd_��
Y II�lIt 'lI/;,�n�'
--
l�
/ -'
li
I
refit
0
13
=..
�.i q�l ..
-.v.....�.w.::''r ._.in klV7)�G%`lr>"N"✓✓�''...
VBP
-...•..�••N�dA Nd'l:"2nd0",�N
A
y
vas r o1 rl-i)�
(�Mo t �.Mo'�Mo err rOwl
r :..,>-'''*.rsv.;`tr1 Sa rar,Wj` :' 19. .

Unl1nn
Materials Company
September 23, 1991
Mr. Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Renewal and Modification of Permit No. 86-03
Elkin Quarry
Dear Mr. Davis:
We are pleased to submit herein the additional information requested by your letter of August
6, 1991. This is believed to satisfy all of your concerns and finally be approvable. We
respectably request your earliest consideration of this transmittal as we urgently need to proceed
with the proposed work so as to continue to supply crushed stone to the local market.
Please refer to the enclosed correspondence from our consultant, Mr. Jeff Moody, which
addresses the items of your August letter. Additionally, we offer the following supplemental
explanations:
It is inappropriate to require a larger scale map at this stage of the renewal/modification
process, after several previous submittals. Such would require additional project and
review delays as well as great additional costs. This matter was addressed recently during
the joint meeting of the land Section and NC Aggregation Association.
2. All areas that are disturbed and/or proposed to be disturbed are depicted upon the
transmitted plans. All other areas should be considered buffer zone areas until such a
time that modified plans are submitted to your office; they will not be disturbed without
your approval.
3. Your office has received erroneous information concerning the drainage draw along the
eastern mine permit boundary. We have not plugged or relocated/diverted said drainage.
The USGS quad map for this area shows this feature to be a "non -blue line", wet weather
draw. Past and proposed mining activities will not adversely impact same.
MIDEMn DIVISION I PO BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE 919 ] ,tB 0

Tracy Davis - Elkin Quarry
September 23, 1991
Page 2
u
Please contact me if you have questions in the above matters. Again, your prompt and favorable
racnnnca is ranm cGw4
Sincerely,
Mike Pop Iirf
Environmental Engineer
cc: Jeff Moody
Jinn Bryson
Phil Dotson
Tim Hendrix
Russ Willard

JF +
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Heaith, and Natural Resources
Division of land Resources
James G. Martin. Governor
William W. Coney, Jr., secretary
L!r. Mike Poplin
Environmental Engineer
lulcan Materials Company
11ideast Division
?. 0. Box 4239
Kinston --Salem, NC 27115-4239
?E: Renewal and Modification
Elkin Quarry
Surry County
Dear Mr. Poplin:
August 6, 1991
of Mining Permit No. 86-03
Charles H. Gardner
Director
The review has been completed on the supplemental information you
submitted in response to my March 4, 1991 letter regarding your requests
,or renewal and modification of the above referenced permit. Several
items are still in need of further clarification by your company before
this office can proceed with its processing of your requests:
(1) Although it is appropriate to provide an overall mine map of
the mine site at a 1 inch = 200 foot scale, such map should
then be divided into segments, as needed, and enlarged to a
1 inch = 100 foot scale to clearly indicate proposed land
disturbing activities at the site similar to the maps required
for new applications. Therefore, a detailed mine map at a minimum
scale of 1 inch = 100 feet must be provided for areas of
concentrated activity and disturbance at the site. Such areas
include Stockpile Area "A", the haul road relocation and
Overburden Disposal Area & Stockpile Area "B".
(2) A typical detail for the proposed boulder barrier must be
provided that indicates the size (i.e. height, width, etc.) of
said boulders.
(3) Permanent Ditch No. 13 at the top of the cut slope along
Stockpl i e Area "A" has not been prov I ded in the Cross -Sect i u"i
At Stockpile Area "A" on Sheet 3 of 3.
(4) A typical detail of the four (4) foot high barbed wire fence
must be provided. Said detail must clearly indicate the type
and size of the posts, their spacing, the spacing between
strands, number of strands, etc.
L P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 2760-7687 & Telephone (9i9) 733-3033
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Fmpioyer

Mr. Mike Poplin
August 6, 1991
Page 2
(5) The Cross -Section At Overburden Disposal Area on Sheet 3 of 3
must be revised to clearly indicate the maximum slope angle of
the fill and the location of the slope drain that will be
utilized. Furthermore, a note(s) should be added to the mine
map that clearly states that all overburden at the site must
be maintained at a minimum 2:1 slope or flatter to provide
sufficient slope stability.
(6) The Trapezoidal Riprap Channel detail must clearly indicate
that the channels will be undercut a sufficient amount to
ensure appropriate filter and riprap placement so as not to
reduce the channel Is designed cross-seVtIona', area.
(7) The mine map must be revised to include a specific statement
that all areas at the site now considered to be buffer zone
areas shall remain undisturbed and shall not be disturbed
until a detailed sedimentation and erosion control plan has
been submitted to and approved by this office.
(8) The design volumes of Permanent Sediment Basin Nos. 5 and 6
are not adequate as the calculations to determine the required
volumes are in error. This office requires that a minimum of
1800 cubic feet per disturbed acre be used in order to obtain
sufficient storage area for settling. Although this office in
the past has allowed temporary basin volumes to be halved if
easily accessible for cleanout, these measures are considered
permanent and must be designed using the above rule of thumb.
These measures were only sized for 1/4 of the 1800 cubic feet
per disturbed acre required.
(9) The channel chart on Sheet 2 of 3 notes that the Lining Class
for all rock -lined channels will be Class B rip -rap. The
minimum stone thickness for Class B rip -rap is 22 inches.
However, the thicknesses outlined in the chart range from 9
inches to 27 inches. Said chart must be revised to reflect
the 22 inch stone thickness or 2 times the d50 stone size, at
a minimum.
(10) This office has been recently advised that flow has been cut
off in the creek (branch) that runs along the eastern mine
permit boundary and that it has been diverted into the pit.
Has your company plugged or relocated/diverted said creek?
Please address this issue.

Mr. Mike Poplin
August 6, 1991
Page 3
Please forward two (21 copies of the re:nested information to my
attention at the following address:
Land Quality 5=ction
P. 0. Box 276£'
Raleigh, NC 27611
If you should have any questions on the above, please contact Mr.
Doug Miller at [phone] or me at (919` 733-4574.
Sincerel r,
Tracy(�/� ]avis" E.I.T.
Mini ng.'S ec i a l is
Land Quality Section
TED/se
cc: Mr. Doug Miller

July 31, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: Tracy Davis
RE: VMC - Elkin Quarry, Surry County
I met today (11:00 A.M. - 12:30 P.M.) with Dewey York (business
card attached) and Jeff Combs (phone numbers: [phone] (Home) and
[phone] (Work)) to discuss the above referenced mining operation.
Their main concerns were blasting and dust.` They indicated that flyrock
has occurred in the past (the Dept. has never been notified of such in
reviewing the mine file) and that damage to nearby houses has occurred
due to blasting and vibration from the quarry. I asked them for
information to substaniate their claims - they had no evidence, only
verbal reports. I advised them that the Dept. could not investigate any
of the above claims without some verification/documentation from them.
Furthermore, future claims can not be investigated by the Dept, until we
have been notified immediately upon their occurrance with specific
dates, times, photographs, etc. I explained that our first step would
be to review the blast records for the dates in question and proceed
from there. I also noted that the Dept. cannot assess damage, that they
would have to have a certified consultant prepare a 3rd party report and
submit copies of said report to this office. If said report confirms
that damage has been caused by the quarry blasting, then the Dept. could
use said report to act accordingly. I also emphasized the need for
residents to maintain log sheets for severe blasts and advise the Dept.
(in addition to VMC) of these dates so we can evaluate them.
I advised them to contact the Air Quality, Water Quality and
Groundwater Sections concerning any potential problems in those areas.
Mr. Combs did note a concern regarding an adjacent creek that has had
its flow cut off. I told him I would look into this.
We then proceeded to briefly discuss the pending renewal and
modification requests and the policies and procedures that the Dept.
follows in evaluating these type requests. I emphasized the 7 denial
criteria of the Act and that we could not consider local zoning issues.
Mr. York requested a copy of the revised mine map received by this
office on June 19, 1991. I provided him a copy of the section that
outlined property to be added to the permit as buffer which is owned by
Greenwood and leased by VMC (He asked me to state in writing on the map
copy that said map was received by this office on 6/19/91 - I did so).
They thanked me for my time and information. They indicated that
this meeting was productive in advising them of what avenues to take in
the future to advise the Dept. of their concerns.
TED:se
cc: Doug Miller

c ..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
October 25, 1991
�EG�IVEi�'
M E M O R A N D U M ppY 2 a 199�
TO: Tracy Davis la,� .AND C.tUALIT'( SECTION
FROM: Lee Spence
THRU: Doug Miller
RE: Renewal & Modification Request for Mining permit
#86-03, Elkin Quarry, Re -Revised Submittal
Following are comments on the referenced submittal:
1. Perhaps we should have pointed the scale error out earlier,
but can they not read the application? We have been pushing
them for a long time to submit improved mine plans.
8� Certainly they have the resources to submit a mine plan of
reasonably good quality at a readable scale.
Rip rap channels must be undercut. Do they not understand
why?? This must be clarified and "they" certainly need to
Q know how to correctly install rip rap channels. This was a
IL.problem at the new Yadkin Quarry.
3. It would still be nice to have #2 in Mike Poplin's September
23, 1991 letter written on plan. They have certainly
�PL*violated this practice in the past at other quarries.
4. Screening around stockpile Area B not addressed. This may
VRGi+ ✓ not be a problem area insofar as screening is concerned, but
U•
it is a new area for stockpiling.
�'y'4. 900 cu. ft. per disturbed acre may be acceptable for
yk; yw ./permanent sediment traps if they will clean them out
°'Oppregularly.

- 2 -
/7. Lining thicknesses are still in error. Why use Class I
✓ instead of uniformly graded Class 1377 Class I or Class B
p L, require minimum thickness of 22". They of all people should
know this stuff.
Comment from G.D.M.: It would appear that Vulcan is intent upon
Oj.v� doing things their way without adequate response to your last
, _�� letter. It is requested that no permit be issued until this
��°',"�L matter is resolved to our satisfaction.
rLGS/GDM/dh
11

I1
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
BURLINGTON OFFICE KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
P.o. box 1179 1749 chapel hill road ryn. box 1244 1207 smith main street 3M east wendover avenue, suite 403
burlingtnn, north carnlina 27216 Mannapulis, north caolina 28082 Rreensboro, north carnlina 27401
telephone 919122&5534 telephone I041938.1515 telephone [phone]Q754
Tax 9191226-3034 far ]04191Bfi81R far 919117&2583
P RJ PLY TO:
Kan p s Office
Mr. Mike PolioAn,
Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
P.O. box 4239
Winston-Salem, NC 27115-4239 �q(/Tr
S
RE: Elkin Quarry _
Burry Countyy"NC (j 1
Dear Mike:
Please find enclosed sets of revised Detail Sheets 2 and 3, one
I.
copy of Mine Map Site Plan marked with required revisions that
should be incorporated oA the original drawing. 2 verified with
Jim Bryson that you do lave the original drawing.
\ U \1iI j
The following revision shave' -been incorporated on the plans in
response to Tracy DavisilletterLdated August 6, 1991.
i'
1. 1 inch = 100 foot map_not. included. I
2. Size and spacing of proposed boulder barrier indicated on
detail of crass -section at stockpile area "A" on sheet 3 of 3.
3. Ditch No. 13 w11
as -added to-.Cross_Section_at -Stockpile Area "A"
on sheet 3 of 3.
4. Typical detail of a four foot high barbed wire fence detail
added on sheet 3 of 3.
5. 2:1 side slopes have been added to the cross-section at the
overburden disposal area detail. Also, a note has been added
to the plan concerning the 2:1 side slopes.
6. Riprap channel detail revised to clarify that the dimensions
do not include any undercut.
LUMENCE A, ALLEY, .. IfrrIRY D. MnonY, PI.
P.J. . WAYNE R. FIRM ILLS, DLMOREOS N, CAELINICOS, A.LA, BE R.A.
FRANE R. MOLL e1.E DARRELLL MuSELL PE. KENNEEN D, 5TAFEORR A.I.A.

Mr. Mike Poplin
Page 1
September 12, 1991
7. Vulcan Materials Company to address.
8. Sediment Basins 5 and 6 were designed for 1/2 the required
volume, and should be cleaned of sediment at a minimum of
every six months.
9. Lining class on channel chart has been revised using either
Class I or Class II riprap
10. Vulcan Materials Company to address.
Please call me or Jeff Moody if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Alley, Williams, Carmen, & King, Inc.
Michael D. Bowers, E.I.T.
IIII
Ed alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.

a
RECEIVED
State of North Carolina AUG 2 1 1991
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural,IrYSECiIOry
Winston-Salem Regional Office -
James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Coi Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
August 19, 1991
LOWS W]:A1k10i
TO: Tracy Davis
Land Quality Section
FROM: Janet M. Russell (AV-iii
Groundwater Section/DEM
Winston-Salem Regional Office
SUBJECT: Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Permit #86-03
Burry County
This memo is in response to our telephone conversation of
last week. You asked me to suggest locations for permanent
groundwater monitoring wells at the Vulcan site. One well should
be located topographically upgradient from the pit and two wells
should be located apart and topographically downgradient of the
pit. The wells should be close to property lines, away from the
present pit area and away from any future expansion.
That leaves much leeway in siting the well locations. As
long as they are not in the way of proposed expansion and are not
close enough to the blasting for the casing to be upset, one up
and two downgradient wells should provide helpful information
about water level fluctuation.
Proper construction practices should be employed and a well
construction permit must be obtained from our office prior to
construction.
JMR/ahl
8015 Nonh Point Boulevard, Suite Im, Winvon-Salmn, N.C. 171063103 • Telephone 9W7&MMX Crl% 1196-17007
M9) 896-700d PAX
An Equal Opimitunny Affirmative Action Employer

N.C. Department of Environment, health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
� ,p� Telephone Log
nate:�Js! snit 1 of �
Time: Onan Call: Plamd ❑ Received O
pro IAf I rN Returned kl
2. Conversation with: &m �• A � + TTelephone:( )
3. Affiliation:
4. Content
1

RECEIVED
� FEB 2 0 1991
LAND Q�iaCITY SECTION
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Jaynes G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF'ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
February 19, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
FROM: Janet M. Russell e___
Groundwater Section/ EM
Winston-Salem Regional Office
SUBJECT: Vulcan Materials Company
Mining Permit Renewal Request
Elkin/Permit #86-03
Surry County
Regional Groundwater staff has completed a cursory review of
the package submitted by Vulcan Materials Company for their
Mining Permit Renewal. The following suggestions resulted:
1. Ask Vulcan Materials to gather background data on
drinking water supply wells within 800' of the pit
wall. Information would include: copy of a well
construction record or age, depth and construction
technique used. If Vulcan Materials can obtain.
permission from well owners, water levels in these
wells should be monitored twice a year to determine any
significant water table.fluctuations. This information
should be sent to the Groundwater Section, Winston-
Salem Regional Office for an annual review. We suggest
this approach in lieu of installation of monitor wells.
2. Ask Vulcan Materials to investigate closest alternate
water supply source other than the wells.
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106-3203 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportuniry Affirmative Action Employer

Tracy Davis
February 19, 1991
Page 2
3. Confirm that Vulcan Materials has retrofitted all
underground storage tank systems with leak detection.
We appreciate the opportunity to make these suggestions.
Please call me if you have question or need further
clarification.
JMR/ahl

_�.—J
�NVEINS9�_C_OF--DPJtNKING_WATEK. S�1_`C �/E�LS -
--
_
/iT VULCBN_MfiTEKI.ALS—CO_ EI_K_l_lV QVAPKY
_
(LOC/RT\AN�Fi9WN �N�M AP)
_ O_,WELL_R�
_SNOP nw�en;q_U=a�_�
-
CASING
OEPT_y., SG-o--0 _
:5 9+?lC WAT2I=.LEUEL�SIJ=Q..
YIEI_0=2Q ��L�P_EK MINUTE
D1_S.f,
_O i;VJEIl
6N_C0� R6S£J _P_�P_E�Y �DR111.ED_1N \9Z8-
GSING_OE�CN_�
i
Sf7R]C W-TE1`_l£fFL.�.100� 0
Y 1F�S�=1 O$LGFL,.PEC,MINUlE
i]1ST.,_F_RM_P_lT_�^8pg=0_
—O,
RU T_N_ _DAY 1 S PROPE�\`C ni.�Eo g s�
III
CP_S_,WG DEP_CL�.� 250�_
a
''�I
- sATIC Vff_�SEP. IEV,Fl.�.�0=0
III
�
i
—I
—

�P;) d
1 1 Z6

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission KN
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604.1188, 919.733.3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Tracy Davis, AEaAL
Mining
Specialist
Land Quality, DEHNR
_... I.(��,Wny�(�iI
,,/I
Lt'/.�i�l/V�.
/ 1L
�/,
Iii����AN��I'P 1
s nvn.
p•—
-
DivisionofBoating
and Inland
Fisheries
DATE: January 23, 1991
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request, Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry, Mining Permit No. 86-03, Surry County
Our staff biologists conducted a site visit on January 17,
above referenced project. This request istoreview information
and advise as to the probability of the operation having an
unduly adverse effect on wildlife and fisheries {G.S. 74-51 (2)1.
Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et set,.), and North Carolina General
Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et set,.).
This mine is having little adverse impact on area wildlife
resources or aquatic resources in the Yadkin River. Some turbid
water does reach the Yadkin River on occasion from the outfall of
the third settling pond (NPDES Permit NC6005371), but impacts are
insignificant. The proposed road relocation will impact
approximately two acres of pine/hardwood forest. This area is a
low quality habitat area for wildlife.
Based on our site visit and review of project plans, we
recommend that the mine permit renewal be approved provided the
following recommendations, which should lessen impacts to
wildlife and fisheries resources, are implemented:
The emergency spillway leading from the pond below
stockpile area B needs to be piped to eliminate bank
erosion. Riprap will need to be placed at the outlet
to disperse flows. Mr. Tim Hendrix, Plant Manager,
will determine the type and size of pipe necessary to
handle flows from this spillway.

y
o Memo Page 2 January 23, 1991
2. Include wildlife planting materials for erosion control i
and reclamation when feasible. The following mixtures should be
added where applicable:
Early spring: Switchgrass 8 lbs/a
VA 70 shrub lespedeza 20 lbs/a
Fall: Rye grain 30 lbs/a
Orchard grass 18 lbs/a
White clover 5 lbs/a
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
application. If we can provide further assistance, please
advise.
FAH/lp
cc: Don Hayes, District 7 Wildlife Biologist
Joe Mickey, District 7 Fisheries Biologist
Stephanie Goudreau, Mountain Region Habitat Biologist

[Da
ate:<�No; .�_._-alley, Williams, carmen, & kingConsulting engineersSubject
__�_Civ,}�ao7 mouth mdo street a. o. ea. 1248 � Rep xnnneoolit, north curalina 390e2 (toa)938-tsls
i
SEOIMCN"I PIT DCSIGN
JOO NAME: VMC-FLK9JN -I BASIN NUMDER: 5 -
RATIONAL METHOD
SUMMARY OF DATA
DA) DENUDED ARCA-,(-ACRES) _ 1:01 - - -
D> DRAINAGE AREA .(ACRES) = 1.01
C) C FACTOR = 0.68
1) INTENSITY (INCHES/HOUR) = 6.50
(3) BASIN OUIFLOW 1 :'('.CFS) = 446
REQUIRED VOLUME 909 cf-'
SED. PIT 0111. = 5 ft DEEP,x 12 ft WIDE x 16 ft LONG = 960 Cf
960 cf ) 909 cf THEREFORE OK'
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH = 2.2321 ft THEREFORE USE 5 ft
t
h

P,eiCel, ,IPA _ L. L's',rJ NO: 2032 alley, williums, carmen, S wing
e consulting engineers
Subject: �i=�.'YI......
-_�I-'J' l�.i+ 207soutn mein street p. o. EoxI
Date 1 - Rep, kennaColis� north carolina 28082 [phone]
rC f� �K-, c. .� - ..roll?• _
SEC IMEN•T P I I 'DI -SIGN
I
JOB NAME: VMC-ELKIN BASIN NUMBER: 5 � -
RATIONAL METHOD 1
SUMMARYCF DATA
DA) DENUDED AREA -(ACRES) _ --;1-:01• -
D> ORAI NAGE AREA (,ACRES) _ 1.01 .
C) C FACTOR k = 0.68
P> �1 NTFNSI TY ( INCHES/HOUR) = 6.50
Q) 'BASIN OUTFLOW ' (1CFS J,- _ 4.46
REQUIRED- VOLUME 909 --cf - -)-
SF_D. PIT DIM. = 5 Pt DEEP .x 12 Ft WIDE x 16 .ft LONG = 960 cf
960 cf > 909 cf THEREFORE OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH = 2.2321 ft THEREFORE USE 5 ft

proiecC f No: ?05?5
alley, williams carmen & kin
Yr 2 • 9
consulting engineers
t
7 Ij
207 south mein street P. o. boa 1208
Date; Rep.
kannepolie, north comers 20082 [phone]
J.
• SED I MEN4 'PIT OFSIGN
J09 NAME-VMC-FLKIN ---- 'BASIN -NUMBER:
5
RATIONAL METHOD
..
SUMMARY OF DATA
'
- DA> DENUDED- AREA ( ACRES-)- -
D) DRAINAGE AREA (ACRES,.)"-
= 1.0.1.
C> C FACTOR '
= 0.�68
1> INTENSITY (INCHESLHO,UR)
_ '6.50
0) BASIN -OUTFLOW CFS)
_ 4.46
REQUIRED VOLUME i909 - Cf •—
SED. PIT DIM.'= 5 f.L DEEP .x ft
!-!IDE x 16 ft LONG = 960 cf
.12
V60 cf > 909. cY THEREFORE
OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH = 2.23?1 ft-
THEREFORE USE 5 ft
i
�
i

Prolec% No: ''Oo=-
alley, Williams,
carmen, dt Ilmg
=_,:: fF h`++-:
consulting engineers
Subject
�'�l�
Dale: Rep.
eanepnllemnen0 earolina 28082 (7041 928-I515
qf
r'{C,-
SEDIMENT PIT DFS[GN 1
i
JOB NAME,: VMC-E-LK-I-N BASIN-NUMBER:-S
-
RATIONAL METHOD
...
SUMMARY OF DATA
1
DA) DENUDED AREA --(-ACRES) `
= 1 :01'--
D> DRAINAGE AREA..�(_ACRES)
= 1'0'1l .
C) C FACTOR
= 0.69
1) INTENSITY (INCHES/HOUR
= 6.50
0> BASIN OUTFLOW I'.l (!CFS ),
= 4.46
REOUIREC VOLUME 909 Cf----�.
-
-
SED. PIT DIM. 5 fL DEEP x 12 ft
WIDE x 16 ,ft LONG
= 960 cf
960 Cf > 909 Cf THEREFORE OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH 2.2321 ft
THEREFORE USE 5
ft
I
1

Prcleck '•%;.� ._�errJ no:
ulley, williams, carmen, &king
�. .,.�,if ._. F_ .I_. _. J;P1
consulting engineers
Sube
l:
Dille: R2P_ N?r%
Date;
207ox
be P 113, northtwrollns 20e92 1704)908-15115
SEDIMENT PI1' DEG GIN 1
'
JOB NAME: VMC-F_LKrPN--r- BASIN
NUMBER:--5--�
' RALIONAL. METHOD
SUMMARY OF DATH
CA) DENUDED AREA -,(-ACRES)
D> DRAINAGE. AREA..(. ACRES ).
_ '1.&I,
C) C FACTOR
= 0.�66
r
:) INTENSITY (INCHES/HOUR'.)
-.
= 6.50 -
Q> BASIN OUTFLOW• '-(ICFS )'
= 4.'46'
REQUIRED VOLUME 909 - cf--, -
- - -
SED. PIT DIM- = 5 ft DEEP.x 12 ft
WIDE x 1:6-ft LONG = 960 cf
960 cf ) 909 cF THEREFORE
OK -
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH = 2.2321 ft
IIAEREFORE,USE 5 ft
i
r
j •, i

va, 5
— [._•,`, f'
Subject
Date: J-•�-=� Rep. •1/!i�;>
alley, Williams, carmen, &kin
consulting engineers
207 south main atreet p. e. bar 1515
kennapolia�north Carolina 1000R (pOO)909-t513 1
1
_
l e
Zj=
SEDI:MFNT PIT DESIGN
dd
JOB NAME: VMC-ELKIN BASIN
NUMBER: 6
RATIONAL -METHOD ..)_ I_...
., _,J.. ..
SUMMARY OF DATA
. DA> DENUDED AREA (ACRES-)
3.42 .
_.D>. DRAINAGE AREA .(ACRES)
3.42
C> C FACTOR
.= 0.65
I> INTENSITY (INCHIiS%HOUR)
F= 6.50
Q> BASIN OUTFLOW - (�CFS)=
1.4.45
REQUIRED VOLUME 301.8 cf,
SED. PIT DIM.._= i5 ft DEMx _21-ft
WIDE x. 30 ft_LONG = 31.50 Of
3150 cf > 3018 cf THEREFORE
OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH=-7.22475
It, THEREFORE USE 1.0 It
10 i'+`,.J
Jr 10'o h.'.`a Gl!<

Project'. ''irM!-e.:_z:IJ No: -1U5 � ullep, williams, rarmen, & king
q t,_ consulting engineers
--
Subject: 7=. i�lfl.l.11" +��>ii.j �.
J-�'J��--'t' I/IU�i 207 south main street P. o.
Date: Re box 1298
P. MannaPPlis, north caroline 29092 (TO 926-1515 `
y
i
SEDIMENT PIT DESIGN
JOB NAME: VMC-E'LKI:N BASIN NUMBER: 6
RATIONAL METHOD .:..._ .. _....
SUMMARY OF 'DATA
OA>
DENUDED AREA ,(ACRES)
= 3.42
D>
DRAINAGE AREA -,(ACRES).
_ .3-42
G)
C FACTOR
= 0.'65
I)
INTENSITY (INCHES/HOUR)
_ 6.50
Q)
BASIN OUTFLOW (CFS)
_ 1.4.45
REQUIRED
VOLUME '3078 ,ct,
SED. PIT
DIM..= 5 ft REEL' x 21
ft WIDE.x.
30 ft'_LONG = 3150 cf
3150 cf > 3018 Cf THEREFORE
OK
CALCULATED
WEIR LENGTH 7.22475
ft THEREFORE USE 10 ft

Pleleelt 11!✓_--:.:�ul No: `)!% '"-
�_,
Subjecl:
alley, williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
kennapollism(T north carrollna 28082 p' e. 1243 067 938-15155
Oslo:---'�—� i Rec. �' 11"�
I (
- SEDIMENT PI'T DESIGN !
JOB NAME: VMC-ELKLN '. BASIN
NUMBER: 6
RATIONAL. METHOD.
._.. -
SUMMARY OF DATA
-
1 DA> DENUDED AREA (ACRES)
_- 3.42
D> DRAINAGE AREA .(,ACRES)
_ ..3..42
C> C FACTOR I
= 0.65
I> INTENSITY (I,NCHES%HOUR)
= 6.50
Q> BASIN OUTFLOW- (CFS)
= 1'4.45
RIiQIJIRE^, jj.. .,078 cf- I-
v
=�.
FIT DIM, ,5 It_. DE911 !.x 21 ft
WIDE.x 30 .f III LONG = 3150 cf
3150 Cf > 3018' Cf 'THEREFORE
OK
r
i
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH =' 7-.22495
ft THEREFORE USE 1.0 It
I '
i

No: yr>:='
Subjec6 S-DI/fJc i,lr�'Sii< hAIL.. -
I alley, williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
Dale: -='�� i Re }�lii%
P.
20] south ruin street P. e. ear 1248
kennepolisr north enrollee 28082 [phone]
,
f
-.i..
1
SEDIMENT PIT!DESIGN --
'
JOB NAME: VMC=ELK1N BASIN
i
-NUMBER: 6
RA1'IONAL_METHOD. ....�
SUMMARY OF' DATA
UA>. DENUDED AREA (ACRES),i..
3.42
D>,. DRAPNAGE. AREA .(ACRES)..; _.. ,....
..._ .3.:42 _.
C> C FACTOR
.= 0.65 t
I> IN'TENSITY (INCHES/HOUR)
_ 6.l50
Q> BASIN :OUTFLOW (CFS):
.= 1.4145 I
REQUIRED VOLUME �3076 "f
SED. PIT DIM.L a: f5_'ft-DEEP'_x...jJ.:ft_i4IDE
x 30. �ft_LONG = 3150 cf. ..
3150 Cf .> 3018 Cf ITHEREFORF,
OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH = 7.22475ft
THFREFORE USE 1.0 ft
f

No: =iC525
alley, williams, carmen, & king
Subject: S-U1f/b)dr j�=>j£+ ii/LG.
consulting
engineers
ri
Date: 7-�� Re Au�,i
0. �
287 south "in alra0t
kennapolia, north wrolina SBBBS
0• o. as 151 a
(]O<) gB8-1515
I
f
SEDIMENT
PIT DES IGN
JOB NAME: VMC-ELKIN BASIN
NUMBER:
6
RATLONAL_ METHOD-,..�
.... .... ...:....5..
...._.. ,__.
SUMMARY OF !DATA
DA>- DENUDED AREA,.j.(.ACRES)-;.
_
-
.3.j42
.. D>. DRAINAGE AREA_(.ki ES) __ _ ,._}=
.3...A2. _
C> C FACTOR -
t= 0.165 :
-
t
I> INTENSITY (I;NCHES/,HOUR)
6:156
Q> BASIN OUTFLOW ; (CFS)'r
1=
= 14.:145
REQUIRED VOLUME 3078 .'Cf.-.
SED. PIT. DIM.:_ = 5.. ft_DEEP_1.x 21_f.t
WIDE x._..30 ft..LONG =
3150 cf
3150 Cf > 3078, Cf THEREFORE;
OK
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH-i=-7-.22475 :ft
THEREFORE USE 10
ft
S(Zr; �r"<�. 3F�r.:' Tc i`r_�J._arrnSNstpr!SJ
,
i.

TO
DATE
IAA.G JV l UA65)4 -
&4")-CQS
.Gt E
SIGNED
wILv:Noxe.. rrr...oe lxeR..
SPEEDER®
FROM DATE '
U);
SENDER: DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPV,. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES

_
�..
__ �..
_.
_._ _ ,t
" -
..
�

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTRECEIVED�
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES JUL 1
LAND QUALITY SECTION LAINU QUALIIY tC�10N
duly 9, 1991
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Tracy Davis
FROM: Lee Spencer
THRU: Doug Miller
RE: Renewal & Modification of Mining Permit #86-03
Elkin Quarry, Surry County, Revised Submittal
Following are comments on the referenced submittal:
:ii. Do we have a "boulder barrier" detail? If not, one wUuid
seem appropriate.
-. What is maximum slope angle on northern overburden disposal
area?? "Distance varies" is what is shown on cross section
detail.
•✓3.
Riprap channel detail does not show sufficient undercutting
for riprap placement.
✓4.
It needs to be clearly stated and/or
shown that all
overburden is to be at a 2:1 angle or
flatter (Comment #7 on
1-28-91).
✓5.
This office would prefer that a scale
of 1" = 100' be the
smallest scale accepted for areas of
concentrated activity
and disturbance. It may be appropriate
to provide an
overall mine map at a 1" = 200' or 1"
= 300' scale. Such an
overall map may then be divided into
segments, as needed,
and enlarged to a 1" = 100' scale or
even larger. Again, as
per our comments on 1-28-91, the map
is not in compliance
with map scales specified on p. 15 of
application. Any new
application would be required to furnish
such detail.
6.
Again, as per comment #6 on 1-28-91,
plans should have
specific notation that grading in areas
other than those
clearly shown on approved plan, must
be preceded by new plan
submittal and approval.

- 2 -
Little buffer or screening is specified for property line
nearest Stockpile Area "B" (same as #16 on 1-28-91). The 7
�.-..7 } East Forsyth Y1era1� sm thony had already (1
�.1liies were n%C.ep�.cu a� 1JUJl. Forsyth .`.i i
screwed it up. M�
/8. Volumes of permanent sediment basins 5 and 6 are not
✓ adequate. Calculations of required volumes are in error.
It is important that 1800 cubic feet per acre disturbed be
used in order to obtain sufficient surface area for
settling. This office has in the past allowed temporary
basin volumes to be halved if easily accessible for clean
out, but these are permanent and only sized for 1/4 of the
1800 cubic feet/acre required.
U . Chart of channels on sheet 2 is in error. Class B stone
size is specified for all channels, but thickness varies
from 9" to 27" ?!? Thickness should be 2 times d50 of stone
size as a minimum.
Has the NPDES, Water Quality, issue been resolved? See two
�r+r�{ page memo from Ab Brauuy da 4au L-�J-��. L,i1J rs
(f of condition #1 of mining permit {see 3-19-91 inspection
report}. This office would much prefer a "closed loop"
sys em as their NPDES permit calls for.
U
Some major items remain to be resolved before this permit
should be reissued and modification approved.

TO
DATE
FROM S P f EDATE
D h�®\i
V,4" -aQ p
mlwNrnn . oun.n � uwE NUS AIm
SIGNED
SENDER: DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES

J
(
y
,
i
l ;
�
r
'

Mian
Materials Company
Mr. Tracy Davis
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
RE: Renewal of Permit No. 86-03, Elkin Quarry
Dear Mr. Davis:
July 189 1991
RECEIVED
JUL. a 1991
LAND QUALITY SECTION
This letter is supplemental to previous transmittals and is believed sufficient to warrant
the requested renewal of the above referenced permit. The following addresses the remaining
items of your March 4, 1991 letter:
1. Enclosed is an authorization from the Corps. Additionally, the required 401
certification is enclosed.
2. We have satisfied DEM's concerns regarding our water discharge permit and are
awaiting permit modification. Please contact their representative, Mr. Jule
Shanklin if you need confirmation.
3. Per your request, the enclosed inventory and location map of known ground
water users within the prescribed distance of the pit. Alternative water sources
may include the Yadkin River or possible extension of City/County service lines.
Our UST's meet EPA guidelines and will be either upgraded or replaced; tank
tightness tests are performed as required.
4. Our recently submitted plans address potential erosion near stockpile area B. The
recommended seed mixture per WRC will be utilized where feasible.
Your earliest favorable response and renewal of our Elkin mine permit is anticipated and
welcomed. Please contact me by telephone if you have any further questions.
Mike Poplin
Environmental Engineer
MP:vdj
Enclosure
cc: Russ Willard
Jim Bryson
MIDEAST DIVISION I P.O BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115.4239 • TELEPHONE 919 7sr-4 D

\IY11,r�
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
' f
wl r'C1 ��
{
S Jf 1
.ti
►�
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO. BOX 1890JU
,.
28402-1890
�k-
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
June 11, 1991
A/�
•
IN REPLY REFER 70
7 :_ 1 l
Regulatory
Branch
SUBJECT:
CESAW-0091-J-086 and Nationwide Permit No. 26
Vulcan Materials Company
c/o Mr. Russ Willard
Post Office Box 4195
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27115-4195
Dear Mr. Willard:
Reference the meeting of October 9, 1991, with Mr. John Thomas of my staff
and Mr. Jeff Moody of Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King (consulting engineer)
at the Elkin Quarry for Vulcan Materials Company located northeast of
intersection of N.C. 268 and Interstate 77 adjacent to the Yadkin River,
Elkin, Surry County, North Carolina. The purpose of this meeting was to
review site plans provided by Mr. Moody for a proposed fill between two
tailing ponds, and to inspect the site for wetlands subject to Department of
the Army permitting authority.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for discharges of dredged or fill material into non -tidal rivers, streams, and
their lakes and impoundments, including adjacent wetlands, that are located
above the headwaters and other non -tidal waters of the United States,
including adjacent wetlands, that are not a part of a surface tributary system
to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States.
The site visit and review of the plans revealed the proposed fill to 1,e .;n
area located between two tailing ponds. The tailing ponds are a closed system
and do not drain to the Yadkin River. A small wet area (0.5 acre) between the
two Fonds has been created by the actions of water circulation between the two
ponds. A letter from Mr. Moody dated May 21, 1991, states your desire to
proceed with the aforementioned proposed fill.
Your proposed work, involving adverse modification to less than an acre
(0.5 acre) of waters of the United States located above the headwaters of an
unnamed tributary to the Yadkin River, is authorized by nationwide permit
provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions.
Please be aware that this authorization does not relieve you of the
responsibility to obtain any other required or local approval. You should
contact Mr. John Dorney, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management,
[phone], to obtain the necessary Section 401, Water Quality
Certification prior to starting work.

-.CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material -will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will.not jeopardize,a•threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or'adversely modify
the critical.habitat of such species.
C. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those -
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody•(unless the primary
purpose. -of the fill is to impound water).
t
d, Any discharge of"dredged or fill material: will consist of suitable
material free .from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure orfill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may' -adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park'Service has listed on, or'determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer,
g. An individual•state water quality certification must be obtained or,
waived: Conditions of -certification will be considered -to be special
conditions of•the Federal nationwide -permit.
h. The following management practices•,will b e followed to the maximum
extent:
(1) Discharges of -dredged or fill.material into waters of'the United
States will be avoided oijminimized through the•use-of other practical
alternatives.
(2), Discharges'in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
avoided.
(3) Discharges will.not restrict or.,impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the_ waters .or the passage- of normal' or expected -high
flows.'or cause the relocation bf the waters (unlessthe primary purpose of the
-
fill is to iirpotund water.),
(4) _ If .the discharge.creates an impoundment•of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized• `
(5) Discharge•in'*wetland areas will'be.avoided;
('6) Heavy equipment working in'wetlands will be;placed on mats.
(7) • Discharges into breeding 'areas' for 'migratory' waterfowl will ibex
-avoided. .. ;
(8)' All. temporary fills Will be removed ii-',their ent-irety.

;.
,_ •
�
-
>
..
S
.`
s..
�
Y' ....
k
R
.:'
L
,_`,
_
--
.
d
e
�.�
_
�--.
.,
,*
'�h
.,
._
�R
4 t

-2- ;
reissued, or revoked prior'.to January 13-, 1992.: �Jt,Fis„'i:ncumben't upon you to
remain informed of changes'to the nationwide permits., 'We will issue a public
notice announcing changes when they occur.-. Furthermore,*if you commence, or
are under contract to commence, -this activity before.the,date the nationwide
permit'is,modified or revoked,' you will,'have 12.months from the date of the,.
modification - or revocatiori�-to complete <the'activity •under,the present'terms
and conditions of this nationide permie.,
w
Please be reminded that -no excavated orfill materialsrmay be placed'i.n
any waters or.wetland areas without prior Federal permitiauthorization.
Please contact this office for any future proposed impacts•in any,.water.or
wetland areas subject to Department of the' Army 'peimi'tting•authority.,
Thank ,you for your time.and cooperation. if you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office,`telephone (919)
846-0648..
Sincerely,
iA1!
ene i:W1
kJhief,,Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copies -Furnished (without enclosure): Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Mx. John Parker Mr, Jeff Moody
North Carolina Department of Environment; Alls:y',•Williams, Carmen, and King
Health ,'and Natural Resources Post Office Box 1248
Post .Office Box 27687 Kannap'olis, Nortli 'Ca.r:olina 28082
Raleigh, North ,Carblina 27611'77687
Mr. .John Dorney
.hater Qu414ty Sectior.
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,'
Health, and Natural Resources
•Post Office Box 27687 .
-Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611-7687
Regional Office -Manager,
..North Carolina.Department of Environment,.
•Health, and Natural•Resources
8025 North' Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem; North'Carolina. 27106

Yf
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T Everett, Ph.D,
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Tilly 15 1991 Director
,
Vulcan Materials Company
c/o Mr. Russ Willard
Post Office Box 4195
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27115-4195
Dear Mr. Willard:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Headwaters or Isolated Wetlands
Mine expansion for tailing ponds
Surry County
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.5 acres of wetlands for tailing pond
construction at the Elkin Quarry, we have determined that the
proposed fill can be covered by General Water Quality
Certification No. 2176 issued November 4, 1987. A copy of the
General Certification is attached. This Certification may be
used in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers'
Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney
at ala/7?1_5nu1
Sincerely,
Iaef" 9,fo��
/ George T. Everett
GTE:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regional Office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/'946-6481 919/395-3900 919/761-2351
Pollution Prevention Pays
Pn Rn ')4SlS P.64 , Mngb Q,lina 176164)535 Tolenhnne G14-7RR_7f11S
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

GENERAL CERTIFICATION
THIS GENERAL CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with
the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and
95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management Regulations -in
15NCAC2H, Section .0500 for the discharge of fill material
to navigable waters or adjacent wetlands areas which are
above the headwaters or to wetland areas that are not a part
of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or
navigable waters of the United States (i.e. isolated
wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) of the Corps
of Engineers` regulations. The category of'aetivities shall
include any fill activity in these headwaters and isolated
wetlands areas where the activity does not result in the
loss or substantial modification of 10 acres or more. of
waters of the United States, including wetlands;
TYSe 'State of TJ^r+:: .^.arvlin a ccrt LfA. 7 tLiat laic
specified category of activity will not vioiate Sections
301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Lawsi-9,2-500 and
95-217 if conducted in accordance with the conditions
hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of 1 to
10 acres of such waters, including wetlands,
requires a written concurrence from the Division
of.Environmental Management. Activities involving
less than one acre do not require written
concurrence.
2. Excluded from this General Certification are
discharges of fill in waters classified WS 1, II,
or III (public water supplies) and SA (shellfish
water.*). This exclusion also applies to fill in
wetlands adjacent to these waters. Discharge
proposed for these waters or wetlands must- be
considered for certification on a case -by -case
basis;

- 2 -
3. That the discharge will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants in other than
trace quantities;
4. That established erosion control practices are
utilized to prevent excessive increases in
turbidity and settleable. solids concentrations in
the water body as a result of the discharge;
5. That the discharge of fill material shall be in
accordance with the conditions and management
practices specified by the Corps of Engineers in
33 CFR 330.5 and 330.6 for nationwide permitt�
number 26. t"
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions'
herein set forth by a specific fill project shall result' in'
revocation of this Certification for the project.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management may require submission of,a formal.
application for certification for anyproject:,in this
category of activity, if it is determined that the project
is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water'
quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses are
precluded.
Public Hearings may be held for specific applications
or group of applications prior to Certification if deemed in
the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
K
This the f^ day of VlAw*w 4er /%df % .
DIVISION 'Old ENVIR�N7ENT/w MANAGEMENT
By
R. Paul Wilms, Director

alley, williams, carmen, & king
ofkannapolis,inc.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
May 23, 1991 p•o. box 12481207 south main street
90525 ksnnapolls, north carolln■ 28082
telephone [phone]-ISIS
Mr. Mike Poplin M 6.24-91
Vulcan Materials Company P. 0. Box 4195 RECEIVED
ED
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27115-4195 JUN U 7 lyyi
Re: Elkin Quarry - LAND QUAL11Y SECTION
Surry County
Dear Mike:
The following items have been addressed in response to the letter from Mr. Tracy
Davis, dated March 4, 1991:
A. Areas currently permitted under Mining Permit No. 86-03 are delineated by
-)F Additional tracts that are being added to the mining permitted
lands under this modification are delineated by +.
✓2. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have made an "on site" visit to review
potential impacts to wetlands. Their letter of approval and any permits
required will be forwarded to you upon receipt by us.
i
✓3. Undisturbed buffer zones have been provided where feasible between the mining
operations and any adjacent property owner.
(a) Overburden Disposal Area - A 25' wide natural buffer arse is provided
between the property line and the permanent ditch.
(b) Access Road Relocation (Private Road) - A 25' wide natural buffer is
provided between the top of bank on the wet weather ditch and tne
clearing limits for the proposed road.
(c) Stockpile Area "A" - A 25' wide natural buffer area will be maintained
along the existing street right-of-way. Two (2) rows of white pines at
10" spacing each direction shall be planted to augment existing vegeta-
tion in this area.
LAUHENCE A. ALLEY, P.".L.S.
HEBBEIR A. CAM", A.I.A.
HAYWOOD 9. KING, P.EJ .L.S. Fn
akiWmU L. RUSSELL, P.E.
JE room, P.E. LLMJ

Mr. Mike Poplin
Page 2
May 23, 1991
(d) Existing Pit Wall adjacent to SR 1142 - Due to the existing pit
adjacent to SR 1142, it is not feasible to provide additional
natural screening in this area. There is an existing 10' high berm
planted with white pines as shown on the mine map. This along with
the undergrowth on berm provides screening of the pit.
,,'4/. "DANGER OPEN PIT" - "NO TRESPASSING" signs will be placed around the
perimeter of the operation at 100' spacing.
V • The sequence of construction has been revised to eliminate the berm along
tile proposed pr i'vate Lla lil road. A boLldeL UCLLLiCL VU Kuaru Lull W"L UC
provided with a 4' high fence between the haul road and the 10 year quarry
limit. See Detail Sheet 3 for typical detail.
/. A typical cross section of the haul road and section of the overburden
slope, safety bench and pit wall is shown on Sheet 3 of the details.
U7- The seeding specifications on Detail Sheet 3 have been revised to match
those shown in the Renewal Application packet.
V8. The pit excavation proposed on the northeast side of the existing pit will
not be started until after the haul road has been relocated. To prevent the
possibility of "off site" sediment deposition, permanent ditch No. 8A will
be diverted into the existing pit.
V/9. Stockpile Area "A" will be graded so that all water flows to a yard inlet
at the entrance. An 18 " high berm will be maintained along the top of
fill slopes to prevent surface water run-off .from flowing down the fill
slopes.
✓J0. Typical construction details have been provided for all temporary and
permanent ditches,. sediment basins, slope drains, barbed wire fences, outlet
protection, emergency spillways, additional screening, and North American
/11.
Green temporary lin4q5150.
;,The temporary sedime'&--basins and diversion ditches along the east side of the -
relocated haul road are designed as temporary measures. Once road is con-
structed and slopea.stabilized, these measures can be removed. Permanent
ditches Nc. 9 and--l0.are provided along the east side of road in cut sections.
Ditches will terminate at the transition from cut to fill, and sheet flow to
the wet weather ditch. No side ditches are provided on the fill sections.
alley, williams, carmen, & king of kannapolle, Inc. • pA, sw ri" • 2a mum -am - • .. n

Mr. Mike Poplin
Page '�
May 23, 1991
i
V12. All existing erosion control measures and pipes have been shown on the mine
map. Due to the location and accessibility, these basins are designed for
three (3) months sediment storage. These basins, numbered 5, 6, and 7, shall
be cleaned of sediment at a minimum of every thirty (30) days.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN, & KING
OF KANNAPOLIS, INCORP RATED
J f Mood P
JDM: fg
alley, wllllams, carmen, & king of kannapolls, Inc. • pA bm rm • 2w w-o mom svem • wwapoft

A
4
UU110n,
Materials Comoanv
---`"--- --1— J
July 01, 1991
Mr. Dale Overcash, P.E.
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
.. r. rti n . r —ErI - Sri rnnn r'NMI T+11-•
KL`: KeVIS10fi Of trrU>;J 1'40. - GIKIII
Dear Mr. Overcash:
RECEIVED
JUL
LAND QUALI iY SECTION
Enclosed please find a revised flowchart and narrative indicating the requested revisions to the
above permit. This information is supplemental to the application package acknowledged by your
response dated February 07, 1991 and Mr. Ab Braddy's memorandum dated February 15, 1991
(copies enclosed). As you will see, we have addressed and followed Mr. Braddy's
recommendations.
Should you have any questions or require additional information in the above matter, please
contact me. We look forward to your favorable response in this matter
Sincerely,
Mike Poplin
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Ab Braddy
Tracy Davis
Tim Hendrix
DIVISION / P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

NARRATIVE
WATER DISCHARGE SYSTEM
ELKLN QUARRY
Rainfall run-off and groundwater infiltrate is pumped from the pit (settling) sump and discharged
directly into Outfall 001 or depending upon water needs, is directed into a series of settling
ponds. These ponds also receive surface run-off as well as process water from the wash plant
where fine particles are washed to produce clean stone. A polymer is usually added to improve
settling.
Normally, the ponds are a closed or recycle system as water is pumped from Pond No. 3 to the
plant wash tower. However, during wet seasonal periods or heavy rainfall, a discharge will
occur from Outfall 002.

ElK1N QuAiiQ'(
4 NYDES PERMT
1/ADKM Awcq 4C 000 S311 �2
♦ f'
»3
F \oNl RASE- coSo GPM
or,q;JAJ' See Aev:3.j dAW �-�"!D
J ?-I-91 RnP

-Hwy zva
OH��AII 001 -
uxxgmed n r�
r
r SlIALL
SETTLING POND /3
1
IN
PLOW RATE 620 GPM
V_ Rev 7-1-11
SETTLING
rV
:AEW PROCESS
AREA
WASH
TOWER
PUMP
SLLMP
PIT
perm.{ No. NC 0005371
EIK;, Q"AUy
S.n.y C,_.ly
Vlmn N1AW:,13 CC..y...,

/ of)r c _ri,frpyez 7 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
T 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G Martin. Govemor 4 George T. Everett, M.D.
William W. Cobey, lc, secretary /� Director
/2/7/91 ,
R. Michael Poplin, Env.Engr,
Vulcan Materials Company Subject: NPDES Permit Application
PO Box 4295 NP➢ES Permit No.NC0005371
Winston-Salem, NC 27115-4295 Elkin Quarry
Dear Mr. Poplin
Sorry County
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents on August 2, 1990:
Application Form
Engineering Proposal (for proposed control facilities),
Request for permit renewal, _
Application Processing Fee of $200.00,
Other Modification Request,
The items checked below are needed before review can begin:
Application Form ,
—Engineering proposal (see attachment),
_ Application Processing Fee of
Delegation of Authority (see attached)
Biocide Sheet (see attached)
Other
If the application is not made complete within thirty (30) days, it will be
returned to you and may be resubmitted when complete.
This application has been assigned to Jule Shanklin
(919/733-5083) of our Permits Unit for review. You will e advised of any
comments recommendations, questions or other information necessary for the
review of the application.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office
Supervisor prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this
discharge. If you have any questions regarding this applications,
please contact the review person listed ve.
Sin erely�
` R�
CC: Winston-Salem Regional Office Dale Overcash, P.E.
Poffudon Premmion Pap
P,O. Box 27687. Melgh, North Cavilm 27611-7687 TNephcrie 919-733-7015

Xc FacW To fIlrcd p4 V'I5 z/1e/9r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT r
February 15, 1991 GN F£49 Z49 O
/y
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Doug Miller, WSRO Land Quality
Lee Spencer, WSRO Land Quality
THROUGH: Steve Mauney, WSRO Water Quality
FROM: Ab Sraddy, WSRO Water Quality
SUBJECT: Vulcan Materials Elkin Quarry
N.C. Mining Permit 86-03
NPDES Permit No. NC0005371
I have reviewed the material routed to me on the
subject mining permit renewal, and offer the following:
1) With regard to Mike Poplin's letter of July 30,
1990, I was unaware that any modification to the
facility's NPDES permit had been requested. I
subsequently contacted Dale Overcast in the Water
Quality Central Office, and he verified that the
modification request had been received in Raleigh
on August 2, 1990. Apparently, the request was
inadvertently misplaced, as an acknowledgement to
the request was not sent out until February 7,
1991-
2) The Company holds valid NPDES Permit No.
NC0005371.
3) The NPDES Permit in it's current form specifically
authorizes the Company to discharge water which
infiltrates into the quarry pit, and, more to the
point, states that the settling ponds are to be
operated as a "closed circuit process water
treatment system".
4) The Company has no authority to discharge waste
water from the settling basins (or for that
matter, any wastewater) at the location of the
outfall shown on the 7/30/90 drawing.
5) The WSRO received a request from the Central
Office to perform an NPDES site evaluation and
staff report on February 11, 1991. 1 will be
contacting Vulcan Materials next week to arrange
the site meeting.

Doug Miller
Page #2
February 15, 1991
To sum up, this appears to be an attempt by the
permittee to make the NPDES permit conform to his
activities, rather than vice -versa. Unless something
unanticipated is revealed during the site investigation, I
will recommend that the pit dewateri ncy di sn.har ye be kept
segregated from water in the settling ponds. It will likely
be necessary to allow the Company to divert pit--dewater
liquid into the basins if they need to augment make-up water
volume, but this should occur infrequently. Additionally,
this would need to be done only during dry periods, when
infiltration volumes into the quarry pit may well be lower.
As for the discharge from settling basin number three, it
must be permitted or ceased. Should the Company feel that
the basin m v tji R rharap duri n- heavir rain events they Llo l a
J '_ 7 events. S+x .J1 Vu1.0
apply for an "002" outfall permit at the present discharge
location.
ASB/vm

i
TO DATE ItiS
WWI JWW-uerNYMWEINN.{A.
SPEED®
FROM DATE
j� 'DQvK
n
/a
v
-
SIGNED
"SFNOEN: DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COY, SEND WHIM AND PINK COMES

Uulian
Materials Company
Mr. Tracy Davis
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 2761 1-7687
RECEIVED
LAND QUALITY SECTION
June 17, 1991
RE: Renewal and Modification of Permit No. 86-03 - Elkin
Dear Mr. Davis:
Enclosed please find payment of an additional $200.00 processing fee (total
$1,100.00). We intend to transmit other requested information in the above matter
very soon.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J. R. Bryson
Designer
JRB:vj
Enclosure (check)
cc: R. B. Willard
R. M. Poplin
MIDEAST DIVISION 1 P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

RECEIVE®
J.um + %wj i a_17 9_I
IAND.QUALITY SECTION
_
�'L�ftSC FI.1�11�_2 �1\��17_CQP1� dF �1kL
_-
ELK\N_M.I.NE_M1�P�
H (i5 BEEN � 1-11G�1 L_1 �14T�� �T1 A5_1 N CLU DED IN
SUCN QN Z17,\7`1NRL_Mf._115_
511� BK`f SON

VUI[an
Materials Company
June 6, 1991
Mr. Tracy Davis
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
RE: Renewal and Modification of Permit No. 86-01 - ENci❑ Quarry
Dear Mr. Davis:
RECEIVED
JVIV 18 lb5l
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Enclosed are revised plans with details and supportive calculations in response to your letter
dated March 41 1991. Although several items are yet to be completed, we request that you begin
your review as the additional information will be submitted shortly. These items include: Corps
letter, NPDES permit, and inventory of existing wells.
Please note the enclosed copy of Jeff Moody's letter which addresses the majority of your
concerns. Additionally, the following items are offered for your consideration:
I. Page two (2) of the application, permitted acreage, has been revised.
2. Seedbed preparation specs are provided.
3. Payment of an additional $150 processing fee (total $650).
4. The appropriate class or size riprap will be provided as specified; we produce a
wide range of construction aggregates.
5. The four foot high fence will be either welded wire or three strands of barbed
wire.
6. Per the WRC's comments, potential erosion at Area B has been addressed and we
will consider the recommended wildlife piaming mix.
7. The pit expansion is defined by the 10-year limit and the relocated haul road.
8. The proposed buffer zone, Area "A", is adequate; it will supplement natural
vegetation along the existing low traffic volume road, and has proved to be
acceptable in may other locations (recently at East Forsyth). The east private road
is adequately screened by Vulcan -controlled property, existing vegetation,
topography and a buffer area.
9. Screening, Area "B" is provided by existing natural vegetation, topography and
considerable horizontal separation in a wooded, rural area.
MIDEAST DIVISION / P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTONSALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 271154239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

Mr. Tracy Davis - Permit No. 86-03
June 6, 1991
Page 2
This submittal and the forthcoming information represent a very involved and costly effort for
Vulcan. We anticipate and hope you will find such complete and approvable. Should you have
any questions or require additional input, please afford us any opportunity to supply same in a
most timely manner. We are very anxious to conclude the renewal process regarding this permit.
Sincerely,
Mike Popl n
Environmental Engineer
MP:vdj
cc: Jim Bryson
Russ Willard
Rev: 6/ l 1 /91

Vulcan
Matarink rmmnanv
June 6, 1991 RECEIvE®
JWW d 1 WJ `
Mr. Tracy Davis
IAND QllAUlY SECTION
1.anu Quaiity Swoon
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
RE: Renewal and Modification or Permit No. 86-.03-_Elkin uarry
Dear Mr. Davis
Enclosed are revised plans with details and supportive calculations in response to your letter
dated March 4, 1991. Although several items are yet lobe completed, we request that you begin
your review as the additional information will be submitted shortly. These items include: Corps
letter, NPDES permit, and inventory of existing wells.
Please note the enclosed copy of Jeff Moody's letter which addresses the majority of your
concerns. Additionally, the following items are offered for your consideration:
1. Page two (2) of the application, permitted acreage, has been revised.
2. Seedbed preparation specs are provided.
3. Payment of an additional $150 processing fee (total $650).
4. The appropriate class or size riprap will be provided as specified; we produce a
5. The four foot high fence will be either welded wire or three strands of barbed
wire.
6. Per the W RC's comments, potential erosion at Area B has been addressed and we
will consider the recommended wildlife planting mix.
7. The pit expansion is defined by the 10-year limit and the relocated haul road.
8. The proposed buffer zone, Area "A", is adequate; it will supplement natural
vegetation along the existing low traffic volume road, and has proved to be
acceptable in may other locations (recently at East Forsyth). The east private road
is adequately screened by Vulcan -controlled property, existing vegetation,
topography and a buffer area.
9. Screening, Area "B" is provided by existing natural vegetation, topography and
considerable horizontal separation in a wooded, rural area.
MIDEAST DIVISION I P.O. BOX 42M • WINSTON-SALEM, NOWH CAROLINA 2711S4239 • TELEPHONE 919 ]6]d600

Mr. Tracy Davis - Permit No. 86-03
June 6, 1991
Page 2
This submittal and the forthcoming information represent a very involved and costly effort for
\/,Anon M. and hnna 17nii 11r111 Finr1 cicrh rmmnh-ta and nnnii-n- ahla Chnnlrl vnil hnvP
. �...c.,e. ... u.....F— u.... ..—F- j-- ..... .....,. ...,...t.....— ....— ..r.t... ,... ... .7-- .......
any questions or require additional input, please afford us any opportunity to supply same in a
most timely manner. We are very anxious to conclude the renewal process regarding this permit..
Sincerely,
Mike Poplin
Environmental Engineer
MP:vdj
cc: Jim Bryson
Russ Willard

TO
DATE
SPEED®
FROM DATE
' oe2 l 12AvlS
_,.ISUBECT VA/IG = rz��u �'_ ? �crrsr/-tom
wlawNwlaP � aar � xAw Ix a xA
SENDER: DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES

('�llf 5� �9h am7 os1- I
OMh�,�ij G°' a —
a 0)
ao
oa'ay�
I
Ib/LJ+� d GNN +YG�d aQ,f s/ c1'? � �olOrY �WiOL
I
ORi,� L �dZl'2
Joe 641
69 61 a4) -2( To = 4-Y911— ro
�oil��lafy�fil�lL hid—tzrruy-�Pmc2® �+rrJ �A Pfl 'F�'�II
-+@
aBf � C J�U, "yi 9•� —
e4f—
oS2—
�SYYI'�a'!f
RA 059i =
(�"YtYSIN'�1471� a^ty� fN?
(Jrr1/i"�Chy��M1`d •��'� /dNd'1C�� �D�� (� 6"t-i'1 �11 S�- �Z �
-�`
I1�4�
��w,vv►sru -vh 4/ ^ara �2�'i+ �'+'0 �J P;v aRS� %
5�1o'IL�lvr¢nry C1� — i1�/I "yam QcC
l b14�%

�;;;
t'�f�

RECEIVED
JUN a1'Ini
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT - Revised page No. 2 LAND QUALITY SECTION
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MINE.
1. Total acreage at site covered by this permit application: 230.07 ac
Acres owned T72,89 Acres leased 157.18 Property owner if leased
M. W. Greenwood. 2.6 ac - IN & M. Greenwood, 154.58 ac _
2. Name of all materials mined: Granitic schist
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge
Truck X Dragline & Truck_
Other (explain)
Underground Shovel &
Self -loading Scraper
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet)-400'± fromReference elevation: 950±
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 300't
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No If no, pro-
ceed to Question 6.
a. Acreage of previously affected land(s) at present site that has not been
reclaimed: 43 acres (identify all areas on your mine map).
b. Wheri and by.whom was this activity conducted? arior to and since 1970
ymc
c. Acreage of previously affected land at present site that has been reclaimed:
0 acres (identify all areas on your mine map).
d. When and by whom was this activity conducted?
e. Do you wish to exclude any areas noted in 5a or c from this permit application?
Yes No X If yes, how much? acres (identify all
areas on your mine map).
6. Present (premising) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 42 ac Pasture ac*Forestry 133.77 ac Fish/Wildlife ac
Recreation ac Other 54.3 ac *Active mine area.
7. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed
(estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 42 ac Pasture 24.3 ac Forestry 63.77 ac Fish/Wildlife 100 ac
Recreation ac Other ac
B. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
1. Number of years for which permit is requested (10 years maximum). 10
2. Total affected acreage to be disturbed during initial year of operation:
a.
Area
used
for
tailing ponds
j,OQ.�acres
b.
Area
used
for
stockpiles
17.05 acres
c.
Area
used
for
waste piles
10.00 acres
d.
Area
used
for
processing plants and onsite haul roads
1.40 acres
e.
Area
of mine
excavation(s)
22.80 acres
f .
TOTAL,
a-e
__54.25 acres
3. Estimate the maximun: amount of land to be disturbed and unreclaimed
at any one time during the life of the permit. 70 acres
2

rProiect: ELK/N Ov�er•_y No, 4o5zt
alley, williams, carmen, & king
" R
of kannapolis, im
Sueiecc D,Tar. �.
ENGINE FR56 ♦RCM.A FC
q /i
Date. 113-9D Rep. D13
12
2m ,.nR ...;. ,�•.., ... b. i2u
iou934-1W
t..a,p,c.....,�....r.., 29092
UI. IJO I - (PFe"AoEmi ..17.1TCNr—.j
b1z t
1
f
Qa: CT A
RECEIVED __
y _..
s
FkxmE A .DED.TF) $ETV0' EN 0,.5 - /hO r N = 0 1 Z7 Jul
i
i
ND,QUALIIY SECf16N
VMC-=ELKIN"QUARRY
.—_....._ .. CHANNEL TYPE:: ... .. .�I,.
16" d50 RIPRAP TRAPEZOIDAL ,
SUMMARY. OF. -DATA
t
N) MANNING�S--ROUGHNESS"-COEF. - 0.1270-;
Z) AVERAGE'SIDE SLOPE 2..0:1 ... ,_ ...0
W) WIDTH'OF CHANNEL BOTTOM = 5.00 FT.
S) CHANNEL%SLOPE " `,- 12 00 %
D)_NORMAL DEPTH OF. FLOW. ! ..0 95_FT.:
WP), WETTEDj PERIMETER 9.25 FT7 r-� 1
A-)-"CROSSECTIONAL "AREA'- 6 55 FT
'f _
.. R)- HYDRAULIC RADIUS. �. _._ �. 0 .71 FT �— --;
Q) DESIGN FLOW (QUANTITY) 21.45 CFS
V-) AVERAGE�VELOCITY i 3.27 FPS I i
T) -SHEAR STRESS 7... 1:1..LBS/FT2 i._.._> 4
VR),V,x R CGRASS ONLY> 2.32 FT2/SEC. '
sNeae 57y,Ess 7,11 blp L i7.S)o /b�ff2- !CmAx sdEa2 sraess.ra 1&id�_� -..
j
i I 7

Project, Lxw 0 Ar kLZ No: 405Z; alley, Williams, carmen, & king
Subject: U-nN CAI-C' consulting engineers
Ror south mein strret P. It. sax 1248
Date; �' 13 40 flap. mDR kennapells, north praline 29082 (7041 939-1515 I
r r IA�rc -N�o L_ �zmaNEnrrl
y 2
1 I I I I I
�AQEAt 7 Z noes
�_,l, — -t' -�•5 eoPc, 3 % I--_
/�
CS�A 0.(pSil}G)�r7.2�+1_= It
_.-
I I -1I n�1_
-_ VMC ELK IIN CJI'Ir1RRY
1 1 CHANNEL r1 YPE - I
RIPRAI-iTRAPEZI:BDAL
N) MAN I
� I { I IMMAR f OF DATA
- 1 MANNING R(3UGHNIIS'.; COI F -: 0 0540'
f '- j Z�) AVERAGE SIl11EYSl OPEj 0 1
{ r- W) WLOTH OF f HANNI L 1130TTOM - � 00 IF'I' .. 1 - ),-' r
S ). EH!aNN[ II 6 ri oc I �-... 3 00 %.) I_ { 1
1 DI) NORMAL DEPTH 101 F1 OW I 0] IF'I ._� 1
__. _ ...._. ...
I WP) WEITI D PERIMt F'ER S 50 IFT.,
0) DI --SS ECTI ONAI AREA i 0 II : i i �) CRORAUL+`IC-RAG lLISl +- I - 0 74 �FT.1 : { ! -
Id
IBNIF 0W-(01JANTI TY) -^_B OB '.GI
I I ) HYD
TI 11
L_ r I J x R (GRAB C1NLY> I 4f FT =/ FC-1
dr 4-
[SO�-
L
L 1 tI I
i
I
I
-1-
I
Ir
I
i
{
,
1
i ;
-

Project: f, ✓+14 OiOP°'/ No: 9D 5 alley, willioms,=engineers
SublecC 7' lC co9-1341 Re . MDS 207 South mein street8Dale: P kannaVolls. north carollna 285
. poRAR % Ibi✓EPs/ D _N.I) �
-T-
, {
I —T
f F
Ci _rlc
I i
IQb :10 a
L
I
I _
r VMC �ECKIN OIIARRY �"�"�
- - ' SUMMARY OF DATA „ 1-
DAL... CHANNEL TYPE 'G1 R tI N_DA TRAP.[EZI I r
'Z) AVERAGE-SIOE�SL-NESS wv.; = iu oby0 i 'i 1
i 1 OPE .= 2 0 I-
'i
W) WIDTH_OF CHANNEL.. BOTTOM - 3 001 FA.
^ -:- D) NDRMALI DEPTH OFF FLOW 1 - 0 55 FT.y_-,. ,
S) CHANNEL SLOPE I 7 00 %
'WP)IWETTEO T. PERIMETER j5 45 rF
`A) CROSSECTIONALf-AREA r + = 2 24FTI�
CFS
SHERRNSTRESS/FT2lIOUI NTIITY)}.� r2 39�LBS - L
,- LR) HYDRAULIC RADIUS- ll 0 41 FTI.
-FLO
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY 3 68 FPS I 1 j VR) W x R (GRASS ONLY;
�AVEMZE i 'Lvuri IN —
1/t i
+ I � C� - r
' _. USE �o1NN famE2lCgN 6,t E11 'yoeARyl iNIN I SC sel
rF
pf P'I'�SIfSLE+Y�'Ti'1y5�3.�b tg
r

Project: 8 t` ; ?Z'/ No: ch�
Subject D, rci-t Cnic-
Dale: Q-I'3-QD Rep. MDr3
_I 1 D lreu No II
I flgbF1'= s zL11l I
�Qlo �C T cEl J 0,�5�6 5)i 3120.:
�..i. 1.
I 1 {
5 I
VMC ELK W QUARRY
r I- I--
�- I I rCHANNEL-TIYPE 9 i dSO I
SUMMARY-01
i N) MANNING S ROI,GHNES
I Z) AVERAGE SIDE (SLOPE
- ' W) Wi DTH-;OFl-CHANNEL-OI
S.)-CHANNEL SLOPE---
.. t. D) NORMAL DEPTH �OF I FLI
! _ IWP)JjWETTED PERIMETER
.A) OROSSECTIONAL AREA
-- R) HYDRAULI(:-RAb IUS'-!
O)-AESIGN- FLOW-({OUANT(
y--�--V) AVERAGE VELOC I-T-Y
.- T) SHEAR_STRESS 7 -
1 ' )_ I VR) [V x R (GRASS ONLY
L 1 1 1
L_' : 1 i
rt5lJEA�ICE S S Q
I 1
- : {' D_,EStIfiN !! /S ADEOVRrE._a
i
i I
j I I I
alley, Williams, carmen, 6 king
consulting engineers
207 south main street P.O. boa 1248
kannapstis, north csm8no 28082 (700) 938 -1513
T
,NI
13 �z �cjs_r L
I
S-- 4
J
RAPE..OIDRL
'L ' 1
0.0680
5 00 FT.
0 551 FT. I -I
= 3_331FY� `. 1 r y
=1 0 45IFTi I . ;
I '
=1 3.41 LB5/FT2
j lT' I.
I 8 F_/SEC
+ a
IJ
3rSoJb�#z- CnAF SNEnLSr2Fssy�o6 19 dsa
I I ,
�4
-
I .
I

Project =Lk64 (')ob-7 ✓ No: 90525
alley, Wtlllums, torment & king
consulting engineers
Subject: G-16d Cf"=
209 south mein street p. e. has 1240
Fennspolis, north eerolins 2e002 12oq 90e�1515
Date;- 3 - GJ Rep. KIDS
vrv. RSA9Ai Dvza<I)
Ac, _. T >,o.WA'-I -
5L PE,= 3
VMC-ELKIN QUARRY, r -
CHANNEL TYPE:'GRASS LINED TRAPEZOIDAL
t
" SUMMARY OF DATA"-
.. .r. -I.
-N) MANNING'S-ROUGHNESS--COEF. _ "0.0580
Z)_AVERAGE SIDE,.SLOeE r 2.0:1
!
.
_W) WIDTH OF CHANNEL BUTTON = „ 3:00 FT.
.
5) CHANNEL SLOPE _ 3.00 S
D) NORMAL' DEPTH OF:"FLOW = -, 0.53 FT.
WP)-IWETTED PERINETER- = 5.39 FT.
A) CROSSECTIONAL AREA = 2.18 FT.
"... !R) HYDRAULIC RADIUS_. _; 0.40'FL. .,
0) DESIGN FLOW _„ CFS
,(QUANTITY.) ,5.35 _
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY = 9.46 FPS
" IT) SHEAR STRESS' "t - = I1.00 LUS/FT2
VR)yV x R (GRASS ONLY)' _. 0.99 FT2/SEC
Avee9a� t(bOu i IN CAeVA;=L = Z.4n Pit�� G 4.a ; (r P/)
5150-
f
JAPJ. PGILMWIPLE Vt-Lcurl__rS, Fps. (,0. b)' 3, 0_!'ps 5I2.46 f>s _

Proled: F1rJAl QoaPaY No: 905?5 alley, williams, carmen, king
Subject; DIiLH C'ALC eonaulting engineers
20]sputM1 rMin pVaat p.s-Oon 1Rge
Date: q—/.3-QO Rep- MVR Meonppplis. npnM1 urolina 4909] p96)999-1613
11
J AREA
VI 1
+ I
Oe - CTorA 65 iG..SQ 4/i CS t
T
J T y�
J YMEELKIN QUARRY—.�
CHANNEL. TiYPE GRASS _LINED TR_ RPEZO+IOR,L.; I _ MARY OF ..-
} I _ r �_
-f-15UMA-
DTA
r 1 _ r _
-- N) MANNING S ROUGHNESS COEF J.- L3.00
0 0650 +
- Z) AVERAGE SIDE ISLOPE = 2 0 1..-. ,- 1 a
W)_ NIDTH_ OFf CHANNEL' BOTTOM 3 00 FP..
IS) CHANNEL SLOPE I - 2 00 %f J
1 WP')1WETTEO PERIMIETER r 5 57 FT,FTi_
-� A)-CROSSECTIONAl-AREA f t 2 36 `FTI: of
D) NORMAL DEPTH OF, FLOW 0 57 I_- _ +
! , R) HYDRAULIC.RADIUS— 1 J1 0 43 FT. I
6ESIGN FEW
i O.'-SHEARAVERAGE
STRESSCOI TYNTI TL) . :I �0 72i18S/FT2
r r
- VR) V z R (GRASS ONLY) y l i 10 801 FTj2/SE(j —`— -+
Da51GN
E f i5 I
vEZA�E E�ur✓ IN C ANC f .. i
I I
j`
T VE o ly w CNANN5� 1[ G 2 i. s _� r, IEmY i IN PErrvt sD i -.
I 1yl I I I I i l I
It _ 1-J
1
�—
I '

Project: imc- F,Kv Ouc=r/ No: 9D506 alley, williams, carmen, & king
5ublecb 117-CFI C61-r-'- consulting engineers
Date. Q-14-ge Rep. M�6 207 mouth note
street
P.*.box 124s
kaonepalt, notlscur41ine 2sosR [phone] ElI 1.1 7
t vITC}J of ttruR rI IIVE25/D T
FFeo90
3
,ns Alexs
1 h—+
6.
�O
t N�NL - 1
t
Q �o. GS o. A, __6 65 ((s 5�3. pa� I . i6�._SD IrGTS_
i � 1
1 VMC ELKINI QUARRY : I
_ 1 CHA KNEL_TYPE 19 id50 RIPRRP TR�PEZOID,AL_,_
.—� SUMMARY' OF DATA-'- a _.... ._. ..._
---'N) MANNING S ROUGHNESS COEF 1.= 0 0680-, ----------
Z).PVERAGE SLOE SLOPE 2 0 I__� 1
t iW) WIDTH OFICHANNEC BOTTOM 5.00FT:. 1 T
.._. —. ._a �_. .... '-
5) CHANNEL SLOPE I t -1 5 00,%I I :T
"'- D)-NORMACI DEPTH �OF FLOW D 74 FM. "--
WP)+WETTEO PERIMETER B 32.FTi:
A ) LROSSECTIONALI-AREA = 4 81 FT.
_ I _ O) DESIGN FL . ! _- 1.Fi. R) HYORAULI RADIUS0 58
OW (QUANTITY) _ 16 50'CFS
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY '=I 3 3 FPS
_
I,
T) SHEAR-STRESSI—'- - 1
I -_ � 32 LBS/17. T21T—
1
VR)`V x -R (GRASS ONLY) - -J t 98'-F72/SEC
i
SNEAe_,57Res 4I ;I6'/tZ�3 86
I '
. jE514n/ ADEC1URre-
r

Project: Vmr- E(-cw No: qC1,505
subiecl: 7' rr' a CAI.0
i, carmen, 6 king
consulting engineers
Date: S-ZI-0I Pep. wA ?
mein slrwt P.O. box 1348
north r Mlins 10002 (704) 9304313
j iID)Ircd
Nol 8A__-' PEe/rQN D teT SI�ir
(
.aND iPoA Il
J.
_ LsA-,5
LqN�
�VSe Pee CT� nn r a
I I_�L
T1�
T {0 S.�—��i—�
1
I
r L
33)_-5�1>IiV
4-1
ooq
4
..I a8 X4
obi rE�uRerl__'�
-h
1 15CMC
-
EL N PRAP ITRA
HRNNEL TYPE:I
? f-nr;n r
..
R1r
DAL:
r•
MARY.DFDIDA'
-
(�
5 i
N!)
ZI)
MANNING''S ROUGHNESS CDEF, OJOB40
AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE �I 1 - 2I=
-W)
r y J
WIDTH tOFI CHANNECI"'BOTiTOM - 3"�DO"FT
ANNEL
j '"'
I- t 5)
+
CH SLOPE 7 E30 %
'
t--
L--Ilf
—�--I
f
L7 36 FEIT-
.�- L, T
FT
1
I "A
r
y
),HLNUhtcPE YDRAULI CDRADIOSEA'- j --, `
D h66 FT!
YI4
)I
r
RP
l)
SHEARGSIRESSC(]`TANTIITY
r l
77..FPS
11
T �--J
VR)
-
Vi [ R (GRASS DNLY> I 59_FT2/SE_
A�E-Q
' 1 D6,IEt5
r
-r
; !
J�
I Iif

Project: Wk-EL%Ihl No -
Subject: Di`GN CAVL
Date'. S-Z 1-ql Rep: NID�i
;, Carmen, & king
consulting engineers
207 south mein III 1 1. p. o. box
kannspaile. north carolina 28082 (7041 e38
J_1
Dlru-!
�
r—f
f1-93 f�l?YY'AN�r{{I'r
1� D��GJ=�Etws�i,/
rj
koAD
'NND�
I
I.�XJ(-J�CIeflR
r
I
I
�
l i
�
r�-�
i
i
o.zI--
I
�0�8� 1 3-•a�i�oi-_
-I
�-
+
I
I
—
I j
�-I �"�
I
L—Il,ol
6865�—I_
_!— 1
o
I
I
—
LLLL
—
--I--�
Pie m AI
hi
—
I
054
C
��
. -r
f
ff
CHANNEL
TYPE
RIPRAP-TRAPEZOIDAL-
L
iT
DATA- �
i
1�
r
SLUM-MTAR%Y--.OF-.
I. r
N.)1MANN
[N6�S R
GHNESS COEF.I IO o140
-T.i—j2 0
1(
I
I
i
`I
_ AVERAGE
)IW IDTH
-�- -) CHANNEL--ISLOPE--I-'-I---'--
510E
OF CHANNEPE
I
BOTTOM -- /1 50-FTC-;-j-
{
li
i• -+
1
J_L�y'
)1NORMAL
I
DE
T PTHF,LOW
TED I PERIMETER
-t
f -.-- 131 6
-I-
FT
1
I
_
i
L
�!
l
A)�CROSSECTIONAL
�1 R)IHYDRAULICRADIUS
AREA I
FT-T
;
i-
DESIIGN
iAVERAGE-�
FLOW I (OUANT
VELOGI-T-Y—+-�i
IT --, A - 1 4 46
�- } 3i BO-FP-S
CIF
3 L85/FT2
1
T
II --I! _
i
- -!--
--. _
--r---�
T-)�-SHE'AR;•-STRESS--i-i
l__
1.1I.23
FT2%SEC
_
-
_I
!
I_i
�Sd
STRE55 /5
LF,Y_�T}/q�J/IIAF� PE�Ini55�LE
Eq� IST2k5.5..�
_
—
LLL
--

I
Prol¢=i: YKC" F!'svd d�pL2�2Y Na: R0525 I alley, Williams, cmmen, 8 king
SubjeCl: �1�rN f aIG. consulting engineers
Dale: 9-14-9D Rep. 1D3 sorsooakmaienraging zepez pnreet <9aensis kpnnepolia, north)
AVE
-E�/
I�RCD>zrFeB'ifi—ail
==
S0d.
LPNU
AREA
62 E
._.�
i
I CVT_.SLaz __103
'_
6! I!e I
o 64 $.--#I.—
I I
O 4 1
O Z4$, I� _
I
GO
F-1�
_.
!ro3 Cis
�
rk
TQMC ELKIV, QUARRY
T` I_i_v.
_,_ _ _
CHANNEL- -TYPE--
`
GIRA55 LINED
Will
OFL�DATA�_
Y S iROUGHNESS
N MANNING'
COEF.
0
Z) AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE
4 �- W) WIDTH-
I --r
2 O•'1 r
t
i OF CHANiELI-
j 5._CHANNEL SLOPE
BOTT �
_ II%T I , I
1 fr
I WP ) WETTED PERIME�
DIERIM
TECTIN
TER
- RI) HWE
gRAULIC RADIUS"
I
�-
O 67 FT
l 026 FT 1 I I
- }- , �(
NT I TiY)
--I fl 53 CFS i
i~ I
4 AVERAGEFVELOCTIT.Y...
I 7' —
I�
I I ) SHEAR STRESS
VR ) V x( R (GRASS
ONLY)
♦—F .L
i
_ __
2 4S-FPS
I
2. '83185/Fi
L i 0 I
b3rFT2%SEC:
1
—
i
62EEN %�n$KARY
I I
LiNiNb 5.950 i �:
F
�Ji?.... �I
T
I. I r ..USE /IGJ,¢7TN A/iJEKiCpN
4.
I �✓ i �E,CYiI SSIBLf
{
ECOe
j ..y bEsibnl IsApEAuarE
_I
T! i r _a-_. I_
°
r
_ ! T.
I •�
I _�I,
�..

IMIMMIMIMIMIII
Project; vmc- Feel aec9 No: Os alley, williams, carmen, 6 king
consulting engineers
FJI
Subject: D iGK P�°
IIOT wu1M1 mein street P. o. boa 1248'
Date'.-4-IQ-Qn Rep. MDR kannapmb, nndD wrpnne aeoex (7oa)eae-I sls
1 tGFop cur Sw7e +
1LPNb tUSE
--
1OPEJ Of3L
Ca
I � i
1 1
i
. _ t_.
VMC EE--T OUAR6
. T--1 j — CHANNEL TYPE -
`'j 1 { GRASS LINED VEE
1
0 5,17
I4_r._.Ii__
f•;3�3'Z
,. _i O*(o
�r
�
1
i
1 � ,
�4
r
T.
I
I
30TTOMj--
-
27 00 ,
0.00 FTIF
_'
i-
I +—}--
-1
7
eo %
'
.OW
.
i
i l
11
52 FTC
I-
r'
�I
1I
_, .... 1......1
L._._.
1
1
f
—1-

1S 111-erclu GvczRY °cszS I alley, Williams, carmen, Ming & king
SUCI¢cL DITC4
�Atv. consulting engineers RA
Yan south mein hoer[ p.e. 38 1Rae
Oal¢: �-Z9-q� Fap. MIDR bnn3polih,nerthwrelinaR98eR (ie<)63e-13t3
L
I
I
I - DIrcN 11.10 !1 �PEKIY+NFIF
iA2E. i i-_
44 Ac Lr�
srniN=
i
1
1 I
T F I
�—
E�Io=�rC T}-O G5 ib 5�.1r 49)
r
+—
.-
IDIKN_He IL.>
-�
... �QlojeL
.-_.-
295 i 3� 77
ELKIMC N—r- 1 r
1
-_i
-
'TICAE I '
1
RAP ITRAPLEZOI'DAL'F
I -I. "� 15UMMAR OF DATA
MANNING'S ROUGHNESS 'COEF..-�
270
_ ZL) 'AVERAGE S I�OESLOBE
i
2
IO.dl
'�-
17
I 1
�.W) W[DTH IOF CHANNEL_BOTITOM �_T-4
CHANNEL SLOPE
2O'OD
.00
FT
% I
D)
1 I
TTE
I � �-�-I
10
R))CROSSEGTIONAMETER-- -'
It r I
IRAD
�3.F1S
'O.L_4,7�-.
J {.
RL)�HYDRULIIC I,US-_L)_.J_.-
Q.) DESIGN FLOW (QUANTITY) {
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY I
10.07
20
GFS
FPS
I
f
SHEAR"[STRESS55-LBS/FT2—�
X R-(GRASS ONLY>
7
+ 1
.50-FT2/-SEC-
�-
It
f t
1
r
f-�I
--
-
4- -
-
-,

Projeec VMC-p eIM Ourem' No: sz alley, williamt, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
Subject: 'DlTtl %'<'=
207 south mein street P. n. boa 1248
Date: r1-]5-4D Pep._Milb kennspolie, north Caroline 20002 [phone]
i l� lrcn ivy �1 ci.. �P 2h7 kAJCNT
_Ea 12 ZS A_ r t _ To �56 5„��Ne.rf. !.
Z' Z5).r_9. 50 Cis
t I i
I - I
VMC-ELMIN 11 I
- -CHANNEL TYPE _-ql d5o QI➢RRP "!-ZAPEZo IDAl
_ L
I !
r 7 4 1 j-
SUMMARY IO-FJ DATA I _
L
,
WIDTNRGI S;, ROUGHNESS LC 0�:0680 1 t N) MANRI
' AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE I , t i 2.0 1
`-I �. `W)" -( P_CHANNEL�BOTTOM' '. 3;00 FIT T�---i--
D�-CHANNEL-SLOPE�I--I--I—; 1 110.00
iWETTED PE
TER
1 1. I A)) CROSSECTIONALEAR-ErA1_1-_t 2-38 FT I -j
w NORMALDDEPTH OF FLOW0_5_ FT
I
YJ_,AVERAGE-.V
R) NYDRAULIC�RADI'S t 0� 43 FI
DESIGN'�FL T
t ELOCITY� t 3.99 FPS
�T) SHEAR STRESS I I 3.58 LBS[FT2�,
VR} V x'R J<GRASS ONLY —i Z.It
I_y....
SNERK S7R.e55..�I 13�58 )b�Ff, ,_.fr0� Ib� f'I.(max SNr.sa= SrzEs ��R-�9 dsa
I. I �E516N
_r�
f
r

Project: Na:
SpDlacl:
alley, Williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
ses wuts +n.,n street . P. e. tw, +24s
kannspo,4, norm umnne 28082 p04te3e-1515'.
Date: Rep.
Av_
r
1-
to tq
-
_t
Ig9 J-
'(�-'-
f3t�711�
I
I�
L i T-
III
T_
1
rot �� i 1
i ? d
F 41
j
1
'—
I
1
I
r
CHANNELS T.-YPE
7
—L—
1_ .L
6'- DSO RIPRAP TRAPEZOIDAL
r
i_ _ —1
I
J
I _
I
r�
SUMMARY
_ OFTA rt
r
N) MRNNING'!S ROUGHNESS
60EF .— a0 L0540
1--r--i
}-
1
Z) AVERAGE—rSIDE SLOPE----T—�—
4!) IWIDTH OF CHANNEL
L S) CHANNEL_ (SLOPE
�
OOTTOM �_ �1 OG
IB OO
FT
%
I
_i
D )--(NORMAL" DEPTH
EEU
FIFFLOW
{_ _ �
_7 10' 49
FT
it -I
_EOTRS
IGNLFLOtJA(OUAERSI
Vi).LAVERAGE JVELDCITY_T.L._It
(SHEAR STRESS
NT Ty13L7O
I_i_j3!94
1 1 12t42
FPS -
LBS/FT2 I
!
z R"—(GRASS
ONLY)
—1--- �l I"19—FT2/SEG—
j
{
�. _.
��
!
I
III!
IIII !Tt
f I IIII
III -Fi
I
_!
_
-�--T_
-
f I
I I I
I

Projec{: ✓MC,-'LkJM (�Vo^.Rd No: 4oszs alley, Williams; carmen, fir king
Subject: $">/nG aT $a5/N 7c.5/6N consulting engineers
ox 1248
Date. R-j4 -90 Rep. MD3 %ox.ewnrnnorthoet P.) 38-1515
kenne Potiz, north urolinB 4aBB3 (]BqI BOB-1513
jSEDIMtrYtF5'N NG.I.,! 1.- I -- ,.
i
i_
112EN01D Fad ARE 9' I! IZ9i- AcPES1 _ ._ i 9,
��
ZSi I
j
.J.
I SE_D[MENT R>•T nccrrNl t 1 '-.,
j
a--
BAST N(N BERl 1 I--
-_
-'
MMEEM-C �LKIiOUARRY!
I jlll I
(--RABTIONAI
u it
-
k r f
1- SUMMARY OF OATRa_
dd --�- -�
ARER (ACRES )1 P 1 29 '
E--AREA (A RES
L DA)
-
R , L-- 0 65
CRFACT00
tf�- I) INTENSITY-I(INCHES/HOUR) 6 50 F
_ 11jjy
N) NUMBER IDFCELLS �,..a._ _ 21 01 . ; I 1
E) TRAPIEFFI.CIENCY (%),!
-_70.00 _1
f SETTL [NG VELOCIIYj(FT/SEC = 0 0047
.',
- BASIN OUTFLOW
0))
O>_ i('OFSi)
-.. REQUIRED
-
SURFACE -AREA 2834. 920
.! BASIN
DIM p50_ft WIDE x ,�.601ft LONG_= 3000 1sf3-
3000 ISf > 2B94 92 iTHEREFORE ,OK
T
REQUIRED
1
VOLUME 2322 cf 'I-' ; 'L r_.�
'Ta
�EFOREi - �
I — � �
Y � SED—PI-T
DIM I-3� ft DEEP x— 25 ft WIDE x TfC LONG �2j'400 cf
400 -}cf-� f 2322OK
_
-+
CALCULATED
--Icf-�-THC
'...-
t THEREFORE USE 5 ft
WE9R rLENGTH 4.119375 i f t
i L.I. V.... l
{
+ ..
--
II
I Ilr
I
J J
I_
L11 �111I
IF
�'�r7
�I
L ids,
f - -L_�-
. _7
_
+
J.
I
�I
j-
- -

projec% Ww- rl ylnl No: (JI alley, williams, carmen, & Ming
consulting engineers
Sublecl:
ROT eoeN mein skeet P. o.le: 1515
Date: ReP, kennepolle, npne u/eline 3T8092 ('/09)908-1315
SCDrMENtI 131RSW No. ._.r—�ZT . I I I I I
I
I i
D,z»INekc />-e�a_.� Tza_Blcec 11 T , L r_ r eDL...T T ua I
tQE
_ -
1 Nu�en '0:65 i t �! 0 ds ._ 1 4 ZZS._l_ I
IRYL TIS75
}ir
L
1 1 C
-r-1-SEOIMCNTt-PIT OFSIrN
I I yD6'NAME VVELKIN_IOUARRY t BASIN NUMBER-_` 2
TRATTfONrLMETHODI 1 i—I_l— r
a I I I I
—• '- SUMMRRY OF qTA
I S
I I I
I D>_ DRAINAGE AREA (IACRES '- 10 651
1 _ ) ! _ 3 201
L...l I' D_ INTENSITY (l HfES7HO 1 ` 10 371 I r I 1
DA)IDENUpED AREA (ACRE
I OUR) Y —_*6 50r I I
t — Vo>TSETTLtNGCVELOCIT%.)( ��_ 2 0� "- ---* —" )—NUMBER OF CELLS1-�
I I _ _. FT7SEC)-70� J _ __ I—� . �...._.�
N F
( - ( }— ' 1 +
Y ( O> BASIN OUTFLOW r(CFS) �7 70 1
RESIN -Di SURF
=-4501ARIEAI1270412L7I f
I '—BASIN DIM r- ft>W12704.21, f2I LDH I fORE sf'�- -� 1
anon ocrnnr J
_ R ElOUI RED VO1LIUM131170t 1 c
fj
SED_Dr�fTEx� 18 ft WIDE xJ2-5fFItiONG =- 1350 cf
350 f 1170 cIEFORE OK
I
4L CALCULATED WEIR-LENGTIH j I
TT
� 84BI Ift_14THEREF�EIIUSE � ft
—�_--{ I � Ii—J{IIT I I I
I
i

Project, ym^- <LfL ND: 905e5 alley, williams, carmen, & king
Subject: 5F>M&GJf ?zl9N "�`A> consulting engineers
Dale: 9-14-40 aeP_ MD3 207 rruth rrunn street P. o. 0ex 1248
■.nna2ous, north csrelinn 2e0e2 (704)90a-lot5
Atrm�—t tA/cl3� — J —
SER'A6e
I i—, Th/Il)veD Biz.b&:.j 6, Git
tL4...IRclzc�
, F ---._ -
I I �
SEDIMENTI P[T DESIGN
-Ij
-_ _ _ ...-
{308 ,NAME VMC ELKIN 0_UA_RR7 ' H 6ASIN NUMBER: 3
RRTIONRL
1 CRY OF DRTA tr --� - -
— 10> DRR [LARGE AREA (ACRES) 0 69'
{ tDA> DENUDED RRER (ACRES
s ') '! l 26
- 7 C> C FACTOR f I �( -+ 0 651 I .i -•--a- i F t-
TIY INTENSITY ( INCHES`/HOUR) { 6 50
-.1_ I
N)� NUMBER DF CELLS - 1 - 2 0
t j....( E). TRAP EFFICIENCY (%); 70 00 1
0) BASIN OUTFLOW (CFS) 0 0047 1
+ BASLN._D > SETTLING VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
Vj 1 F { I i
�- D SURFACE --AREA 18701569 Sf _5 32
I REOU IRE
140-ft WIDE xt 48 ft LONG 1920 sf
1870,.5-69
tREOUIRED VOLUME �1242 cf ` i I r f l
SED PIT DIM. ` -�3 ft DEEP x�_20 fIt WIDE x I25 ft LONG '1500. cf `" —{—
L 1500,--c f-) 12g2j
.. CALCULATED..WEIR LENGTH 12 ..T61f 5i it_�THiREFORE YU E 5 ft _ _ {
.. 1
-..._ a.- {
I
y
i r! I
I r
�
—
1
_
--

Protect: VNd- GC' W' /dmFvV No: W05'5
alley, williams, carmen, 6 king
Subject! 5u`M=�` yP51N !%65rCn�
consulting engineers
207 south mein avast p. a. box 1240
kannapa I is, north as Milne ears2 1704t e8B-1 S 1 S
Date: Q IQ -QO Rep. h1LYi3
gli/i5/
.� $ED1MENi 4_�
! R
S�ENvVED /{ZEat 7D
t
I
EDIMENT PIT DESIGN
SOB
NAME VMC ELKIN.OUARRYBAS
t- L
IN NUMBER •14
I
RATIONAL METHOD
,
t r
r
I
SUMMARYi OF DATA
• DA> DENUCED-AREA (ACRES)
I - 0 70,
T
I 0)_ DCRFADAGE AREA (ACRES)
_� 1 05L -
T T
-
65
1) INTENSIOTY (INCHES/HO UR)
_ _10
16 50 i +.
t
..
I �N) NUMBER OF CELLS
--� ._.
E> TRAP EFFICIENCY (%)'1
r 00
._..
I
Vo) SETTLING—'VELOCITY—(FT/SEC)
I !0
10 0047
y `-
O> BASIN OUTFLOW (CFS) r
! ; --14 44 2t
!
I � t j
r I7
• REOIIrRFfI GI IRFAtrF ARCG!ISSn any sf
_ _ - -
!..[ - I -
I
,
BASIN DIM 35 ft WIDE x� 45 fL LON_6
1 l 1575 s_f
�� 1575
! sf_ i tsse_007 sf
HEREFORE OK
i yBEF
--
1
.
- _
,
._—.r.�.LL_'_.
_~
REQUIRED VOLUME--1260cf
SEi PIT_ DIM 1 .13-Ift'DEER, x..-20 ft WIDE.
t I500 cf.) 1260-" cf THEREFORE.
CALCULATED
WEIR LENGTH 2.2181 �5 ftrTl
--
Y-
L C:
5 I
I

No: 9055 ' alley, williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
!2�1 207 south mxln street P. o. box 1248
Date: $-z)-Q) Rep. MDI> kennspolls, north uroline 28082 [phone]
T�
7-1j on in y_LI
�f
A _
..�.}F._._I
7-1
_ iqo ._1
4��
f `
" f � SEDIM ENfT PIT- DESIGN
i
'-- j �,_ i
�
- JOB NAME VMC-.ELK IN
RATIONAL
_ i BASIN, NUMBER: 5.�.
- METHOD^,-
I�
1
t f -SUMMARY -OF
`—f f ;
a
I--; f• 4- - -I—�
DA>1 DENUDED. 'REA (ACRES,)
.;. 1-1 k ;,yT°p �p✓-j 1 , 1 - F
-_.
-T— 1D) DRAINAGE AREA (ACR7E—Sr)
FACTOR
C. CC
L)—IINTEN5d1Y-(-INCHES7HOOR)
(a>-1-BASIN DUTFIOW -{--(-
I
GF45)
i
- I. I_'���
�C
-�
r r ) I
REQUIRED VOLUMEI�I4S4.5 f
_ 1
t
SEO PIT DIM 1 I S :ftl DEEP
�
x A fit WIDEI xI t4 LONGr 490 cf!
4901 cf )j 454 5
df THEREFORE OK�
1
F
CALCUED WE'IRI LENGTH
2 LAT
-fit
T_T_I
1
—2321-Ft :THEREFORE
"
1
IF 77
-
-
- 1
-
F I r
--4
I T-
a r1L
!i
.I Iri
_
.I
i,_
� I
i
i,
;
l
-r
,
-,--
-
i
T
_!..---..
_..._.
{-
I�,

yMG-
No: °OS?.5
alley, Williams, Cornking
u
6.J
Subject SED
Subject:
-a
M6NT UuQ$iN CplG.
)SN7
I
consulting engineers
sting g
Date: 5'2f%
'—.]hj Rep.
MbJ 3
207 south main street V- o. box 1245
Yannspolla, north urriina 28082 (706) B0t1-1515
I 1rN
Ip
1
i t j,( 1
.If
- t -
!',P
It
I_
I
I
4-t--'�---l-�I--I-�-
I
r
I-1- }.I
�...' , i_.� I 14
S1EDi
NT
PIT
;DESIGN
I j -t I-
I
J00'NA
MEI
VMG
,
IN�UM ER
_,
NAL
MED
`6'--�
r
IR
+-BIAS
Sum
RY, OF DA�T
rf
AREAI3
DEN DEC
42E-
- ---'-�
-E-IDRAi'NAGE•-_
REA(ACRES,-
A_T
-i-!__�
-C>
I+)
`C FACTOR
IASI SPUT
I
(_INCHES/HOS
I
-�UR )� r 6 SO
-
O>
BASIN
OUTFLOW
�
(J
)I 14 45 t
y l
I
t REQUIRED
-SED�
PIT
VOLUME
IDIM-�-
15 9
3 �f
�4-'ft1 DEEP
T• - _T
-20 2 20-`ft LONG =- 1b00-I
_,�
f�-I--�--j
,L-._ .._
- J.
�1600
i
cf
) 1539-1
r : -+
,z ,ftrWIDE
cf. THEREF
CALCULRrTED
_-1
WEIRt
LENGTH
7
224751 If THEREFORE USEl 110 Iftl
�
I I
f.;
Its
i_Ntla Dtm ENsIONS_--t-
1
I
I
� f 1 '
--+ rrr
-
1;
!
1-i i' ! r
I
1
7,
!
I —I IP� j1
Ir
I
I
•
I
I

�ptgjea: VM(- E�KIN N0: 4r^�JJ I alley, Williams, carmen, &king
Subject:
�171M:�lJT lrlF• G,c[,c.
consulting engineers
Dale: 5-21-G Fe p mDP� 307 south main ot'est a. o. no, 1248PA,
kannapalle• north carvlina 2SO82 (]04)930-1013
! ✓col4Fr u,HL/%�. /�C
.�..7 I_t'.h15
t'� 3R5(N _ � __
� ..
�.
I
I
rrr
C�1I—
'
f
�
'._.
SEDIMT NT PIT IOESIGN
1
l�-_I_
b�
h 1 t
I_ J! OH:.NAME ,_VMC=ELK,IN_.._
r
BASIN_NUMDER:
-7.— ----. .__ _._+
`yA
F�_.
tL
�G.
II ,__;_._^
T- T_-T SUMMARY OF DATA
r"1pgV'
I �i
4
r
-, OAXkDENUDEO AREA (-RCRES-)
D> AREA (ACRES)_
I +
�_? 6 �37—�
_ 6-3 7A_ F
rDRAINAGE
' C) C FRCTOR r t
' UINTENSITdY INCHjES/HOUR)
;f
—I"07
r
II.._ `
E. } l5
6 0 f
1
1
4
OASIN OUTFLOW T(CF
1FT}
REOUI RED VOLUME2H66=5 cf�_
�� !
SEOI. PIT DIM_ 5 ftr- DEEP
lz _20 'ft�WIOE
,z 30 rf.t LONG -
3000
cf:_
�.
r i 3000 rcf ) i 2866
_
S cf THEREFORE
r... .,_
OK I
�....
+
ft
II
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH 13
t
if 662 r
I
F—iTHEREEORIE USE I'S
1 -31Asrrl JJa! 7 IW+L+—
mo;
�r+orl k>EEiJ.ii.Ab�..iBtCAtiSEIONJ
r0!3
.(5; e5� r
G 4-pDly
Aj' 5. J CoN eo
ka la
M6RSv2t5
—
I
I
LIt
--
44
_.
L I
I�
i,

Prefect; VMC- 6 niv r,e, 2) o Iey, willinms, carmen, & king
Subject: SLoPF D2NIN consulting engineersE]
Date: A-Zlo-Ro Rep. MID am .o„ee ,,,ntn .aem p. e. ne•tree
P 4ennapotls, madh oeroltne zeoez (704) 9aeq s13
Pt�nauENTgin! �oz_
-I lV�irN L I J L
A¢ 01.40 r— - 7 l
I I 1 7 I ,
(D 40)(615.) —
t ,
3FW .1-TRII.E 6.32 4 USEi /6 -_ G?PI
, I
_�2r' .�aPE OuiAiGFON D1PI .
I �N w-l�aeK MErNDD ZoNE.i...l ..I
.I USE 6' �I�RRY 112 TNlck w. or-
, y
I
1'
' 'lug
- 5- - -
'S�
- ( -�—
I
i
I
F � _U
r 1
— r I TLi
i r .. i I AIM , t _ i I �_ f T I r I ,r_
'Il I i

rroject: Vw'- No: o z< alley, Williams,. 6rmen,;& kin, consulting engineers
Subjecl: PG' JDF'V6hJ
207 "uth mein sizeet 0- 6% bOX.1 2'40_
Dater I - 2 7-12 Rep [phone]
2
PIPES
LA
---
4
j
11
. . . . . .. .
7
. . .
. . . . .
L 13.47
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Worlisheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
Project BLKI1.1-ua-712`/ 9y� Dace 9-14-90
Location 4t;u2(2,./ ! / rorTY Checked Dace
Circle one: Present Developed G E.XI SlIJG -Psm e G-Mcicpmr
1. Runoff curve number (CH)
Soil name
and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrologic rolagie condition: it ion;
percent impervious;
unconnected/connected impervious
area ratio)
1/
CN —
Area
��
23acres
❑mi-
❑1
Product
of
CN x'acea
.a
ry
u
p
F
i'
;a
L
a
f3
WOo1)S- Ltca�F Bw2ul
55
Co.
335,5
g
ODDI)z - N>a% -q
9.3
556,0
C
LJaoos - Lia. i _P)2uS�A
-73
8.4
G13,2
G
LJCOOS- I eFAUGV t6ttWS11
70
S.9
4110
f�4 SZoap
0)3
©.'50
z9-4
1/ Use only one CN source per line. Totals
-30
1949.I
CN (weighted) _ total product 190. I . �,q7 Use CN - GS
total area
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff, Q .............................. in
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Storm tl
Storm E2
Storm 03
IOYQ
5C7Y¢
5,0
Co2
D-2 (210-VI-TR 55, Second Ed., June 1986)
(� 3a-

Project
..ocation
Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt)
BY z3-M gate -Id-9D
Checked _ Dace
Circle one: Present Developed
Circle one: 0 Tt through subarea -
NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each
vorkeheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments.
Sheet flow (Applicable to It only) Segment
ID
1.
Surface description (cable
3-I).............
2.
Manning's roughness coeff.,
n (table 3-I) ..
3.
Flow length, L (total L C
300 fe) ..........
ft
4.
Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2
....
in
5.
Land slope, a ..............................
fc/ft
6.
T[ 0.OD075(n0L)D'e
Compute It ,.....
hr
P2 a
Shallow concentrated flow
Segment
iD
7.
Surface description (paved
or unpaved) .....
B.
Flow length, L .............................
It
9.
Watercourse slope, a ....................
M..
ft/ft
10.
Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ...........
£c/s
1t.
It J600 Vv
Compute I ......
hr
Channel flow
Segment
ID
12.
Cross sectional flow area,
a ...............
ft2
13.
Wetted pevimeteq pw .......................
fr
14.
8ydraulic radius, r - a
Compute r .......
ft
4 w
15.
Channel slope, a ...........................
ft/ft
16.
Mnning's roughness coeff.,
n ..............
213 1/2
1.49 a
.7.
V rn
Compute V .......
fc/e
18.
Flow length, L .............................
ft
19.
Tt ' 3600 V
Compute It ......
hr
20.
Watershed or subarea I or
It (add IC in steps 6, 1
Ukia
(050
s. Co
03 * o3
LJ I—�J D.O
I, and 19) ....... Ai 0•r✓i
(210-VI-TA.55, Second Ed., June 1996) D-3

Worksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method
Project
Location
Circle one: Present Developed
1. Data
3y :Yrn Date 9-I4.-90
Checked Date
Drainage area .......... Am . 041 m12 (acres/640)
Runoff curve number .... Cf M (p 5 (From vmrksheet 2)
Time of concentration .. Tc ' hr (From worksheet 3)
Rainfall distributiontype may- (I, IA, II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread
throughout watershed .. ..., O.3 Ipercent of Am (_ acres or m12 covered)
2.
Frequency
...............................
yr
3.
Rainfall,
P (24-hour)
...................
in
Storm #1
Storm #2 1 Storm 03
W
50
4.
Initial abstraction, I .................
in
11 /
a
(Use CN with [able 4-1.)
--1
5.
Compute Ia/P ............................
0.21
O.Il3—h.
6.
Unit peak discharge, qu .................
cam/in
436 44Fj i
(Use I and la/P with exhibit 4 ^)
- .
7.
Runoff, Q ...............................
in
1.(4�.5
2.50
(From worksheet 2).
—
8.
Pond and swamp adjustment factor, F' ...
oc)(e
O.�iCo
(Use percent pond and swamp area P
-.
with table 4-2. Factor is 1.0 for
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
9.
Peak discharge, qp ......................
cfs
/ 32,Q) rJ'O,Z
(Where qP N quAmQFp)
..-.. -� .
D4
(210NI-TH-55, Second Ed., June 1986)

Worksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method
s
Project \j NK-EiN ByDate
Location Checked ! Dace
Circle one: Present eveloped
Data:
Drainage area ..........
Am -
0.647
m12 (acres/640)
Runoff curve number ....
CN -
71
(From aorksheet 2)
Time of concentration
.. Tc -
6.50
hr (From worksheet 3)
Rainfall distribution'
type m
1115
(I, IA, II, III)
Pond and swamp areas
spread
ccyy
throughout watershed
......
o 31 /o
percent of Am (_ acres or mil covered)
2. Frequency ..............................
3. Rainfall, P (24-hour) ...................
4. Initial abscractlon, Is .................
(Use CN with cable 4-1.)
5. Compute Is/P ............................
yr
in
Scorm #1
Storm Y2
1 Storm #3
in 1 0.917
6. Unit peak discharge, q ................. csm/in d �➢0
(Use Tc and Isle with exhibit
xh161t 4-IC )
7. Runoff, Q ...............................
(From workshee[ 2).
8. Pond and swamp adjustment factor, Fp ....
(use percent pond and -swamp area
with [able 4-2. Factor is 1.0 for
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
in
9. Peak discharge, qP .... I ................. cfa=�.%•51
(where qP - qa mQFP)
D4 (8I0-VI-TR55, Second Ed., June 1986)

Worksheet 3: lime of concentration (T.) or travel time (Tt)
Project VMC- EI.KIt4 By MP3 Date
Location GCvppJ ('n,,..iT/ - Checked Dace
Circle one: Present velope
Circle one. Tc It through. subarea
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each
workcheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments.
Sheet flow (Applicable to I only) Segment ID
1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............
2. Nannlnk's rouehness coeff.; n (table 3-1) ..
3. Flow length, L (total 1 < 300 ft) .......... ft 300
4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 .................. in
5. Land slope, a ............................... ft/ft
6. 75(nt)4 J0 O3
t00 Compute It ...... br
P 2 0
s
Shallow concentrated flow Segment ID-
7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... JAf?p)ED
8. Flow length, L ft
9. Watercourse slope, s Wit 01i
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s V.
11. T L Compute T hr O. QJ + �'0+
3600 V t
Channel flaw Segment 1D
12. Cross sectional flow area, a ........ 0...... ft2
13. Wetted perimeter, P. ....................... ft
14. Hydraulic radius, r • = Compute r ....... ft
PW
15. Channel slope, a ft/ft
16. Manning's roughness coeff., n ..............
213 112
17. Y 1.49 r a Compute V ....... ft/s
n
18. Flow length. L ............................. ft
19. Tt 3600 Y Compute Tt hr + Q
20. Watershed or subarea I. or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19) ....... hr
(210.VI.TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) D-3

Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
Project VMC- c- gti ?; By VD
n
Location 5d)Pp`( `OUFIrj' Checked
Circle one: Present Develo`ped
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Date 5-23-91
Date
Soil name
Cover description
1�
Area
Product
and
CN —
of
hydrologic
(cover type, treatment, and
(�
CN x'area
group
hydrologic condition;
`J
r
Oacres
percent impervious;
u
`v
❑ mi2
unconnected/connected impervious
p
ClX
(appendix A)
area ratio)
-n
L5
'zclool� - ZiGHT 13P_�s}�
55
O,a
49.5
3
4Jo��5 - ii EA'iE Y 3z�5: )
Cn0
j
S S Fj
G
VtiIX VJ -'i Lt TU-iI
7
U.L
Co I m.ZO
LP_'JS i
1� Use only one CN source per line. Totals
30
total product ZL32.5
cN (weighted) " total area 3U �LDE use CN - 71
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff. Q .............................. in
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs'. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Storm dl
Storm 02
Storm 13
50
D-2 (210-VI-TM%, Second Ed., June 1986)

[Subject
Ccl; ^rr.lu R a�Y NO: 90-zm alley, williams, carmen, & king
nvo z4uuc, ens a Dam of kannapolis, inc.
p ENGINEERS& ARCRITECTS
e' 1-IQ-�U Rep. SI•I M7..e6.... ✓,.., b.. e.. 1243
Smn.p,[,,. nwih.... 6,20092 7049141SIS
xlsTlJc�.;NeIG T of C>Am lol B E831Co .i8 �41_ .IS of .____{I
I.1D_UJ. C, ¢2E>,. �.C.eEc5
I I
� I s ,
vDl. Pol2 GB Accuo-T - �0E-5 MDc... HAoE
I ji � r
— Z 111TLP.15
l�E>f�6 Em_E2T t 5is .J/'JJ_- Ri Q5 �. M_IFR-
97 VFlJc
(WSo..b r�255.' IiI .-_. 1.- S77*o
L ..'i._..-_J Ir _' j.._.!.
' , Ok..._G�c.ASE.�AvPRoFicy �Fv
1; F <,F,i r I r +
zi
YJ
.I(D3151 Z SLR )(I Q.)�_ /_.� �Z(I,o),.! 5�_ -
-I_
i_301 illrJ
_I
ovr
__I_._
1 T
V r
......_.
S)
o )-
wr- )
aj_
O )'
_ T
V.)_
)_
'VR )
t
I I_

amre=n. = UC I U (Q(/ 07.I73/
alley, Williams, carmen, & king
Subject: LJV7R7. UUIC_ rav5 0
of kannapolis, im.
EM GIM E E R S A ARCM IT E C TS
m��•.,h mi, ✓,..: ... n.. IEe
..,.n.�:Epez AM ISIs
Date: 5-Id-90 Rep. S'��
_-
1 i I
U ISndSo_21P2�P �ei�P�Z.oIDA�-C,'HAr.WE.L..3O'.OIDE
w/ 2:I Sloe sI_op6S a -ZO%
I
I
Ej`Ev E'r+aE4G>J.LY1O'J.,S0.
E u6V. WATF_2. _ •101.5 + 0.50 = Ioz , 30 -
L—�V• C2H5T_0P I6rn = I0,Z 3 �1,z 103,.5c)
qZ)tt9TerLY SPl L LW r;`ri, Z.. zcP
- HTNLEP 4 of Dr IDQ .pRn?ccluy'. Hp,,�s,E.= -t0o OD,p 2.25
,10-,25
I
FLOW RATE', do 5.5 = C4
I.
PIPE D INCHES_: oI2
IA.-,-,
I
HEADWATER DEPTH,' FT. 2_25
- :.. HW/,D 2-125: - ...:
-i.
, I
I FO CONTROL,-t(0) FORIOUTLET CONTROL,-(IM).FOR
,MERU
S �
(INLET
Co rn PU71ZNozmhw . C �4VJVFo2&— S,SG
:
I
I

Pl6lect, 90� ti aI,Iwl 6,l Na: 9os2s alley, williams, carmen, & king
seeie=1: Hwm�uc Cep�s Dim of kannapolis, ine.
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS
Dale: `9-Ia 90 Rep. Snl NR ..me - ... 6.. 120
bnnepeli., nenF .prelim 29081 7040YN1515
r 1 I
1
(I) FOR INLET CONTROL, "(0);- FOR-'OUTLET-"CONTROI:;,--(M')'FOR-MENU— -- --'
I
j NORMAL DEPTH,IPIPEB -1 --
'.FLOW RATE,CFS :5.5;
PIPE DIA., INCHES, :12
MANNING'S 'n i :.013
PIPE SLOPE, FT./FAT.. :;0663
-:--._-. ..
'
, 1
-- - NORMAL DEPTH OF FLOW 0.:56 — - -1
l VELOCITY AT NORMAL DEPTH 12.19
i
(R)'ITO'REPEAT,. (M)FOR MENU
i 7iE5I�G\1.1 oi- ott--Lev t o-r=IcG'EI DhJ tN Gw y8aic- MT5mov
(,ISE Coldgo TZ.Ip2v�P LZn _� !. + _
1
___ —�
n

Subject:
VrrC- F/_uN no: z� alley, Williams; carmen, 6 king
suhjece �-�rrpBnT��.2C�ronl CALL. eoneultin9 en9lneer8 l Hk
Date; Sa.l—�I Rep.
MDA 207 mouth mein street P. e. hoe 1248
kennepohl north ra.eline 20082 [phone]
Pa D /J0 1-3
�—
}
._
I ITB4
+ DevNp6
�II
Ap�TD /Io3 +}
r _i
I —Z_Ac
I.�...-
O
-
LRND vs
Jl _ C Cd{�
�WLJ
_ T!
cel /r�.•-1
77 — -� 25 T4 89S'
1
—i —II
� nv:= ! ! Cpl _I
I—L
9
Q 00 0 to l
Xrm qa
((-
WQ z
I
�n
r
—I-
5•I�
9�
_
Z,SC3o)F1� + 5
I
Imo.
1
i�I I
I
iTfi T
777
5 I4Ai..
TF 7IL r.
it
F�
Y
t {--
--r
---L
T
i
Z

`/ML- FLoN ���No: D52
: 66-oir4CqT p ?:QcK�fO nl ll r1T�'-0
I
alley, Williams,=engineers
coS-L-RI
207 somh main ste"I8p kannspolis, noirth camlina 28
Hap. MD8
r
I I� 1.
I i
�
_
]
i VMC VULCAN
Dfi? N
l
HANNEL
i
I,St DSORIP_RAIPAPEZFO
1 I
4
j� �-
. j
SUMMARY, OF
TAT 11
DA :�I
1.
--;
C-'��9 �.I t111
NI) MANNING'S ROUGHNESS
III -
COEF - O 1040 -I-
I
�-�`-1-
',
ZI) AVERAGE SIDE St
l
2
FIT..!
W.IDTH�OF CHANNEL_BOTTOM
.�._ 30-100.
-
S L
�), CHANNEL -SLOPE
�,- i I 1
4 122
I _
LD) NORMALI �EPITH OF FLOW
P T, WETITE
O �- i
I_
l
CROSSE , �-
RI)-HYDRAULIC-RADIUS
IUANT
BOl-%T
_
`
0-69-FT�-
`
F TIY
.) DESRGNLICOWA(
l t_
).-_L.. CFS
!
ITYI-.
{
TI) SHEARGSTRESSC
R�
.i 6 34 CBS/F�T2
LR )i V X (GRASS ONLY)
1 2 189— 2/SEC ..I -i
_
j ; -
. I
Y
1
-
I
1
41�,l,s
l
T
�
r
_
I
1—__ I T
Y
I J_. j
". I
_
-t

O vie2 VML- Eucl,l /� No: ' �< alley, willinms, carmen, &king
Subject: Seblm�1-N� F2C-lnhl \kLC consulting engineers
Dale: S-2.I-N I Re M �r3 207 south non street p. o. bps 1240
p 1
kannapo114 north cerollno 28082 (704I 928-1515
t
l
�LGQ,IIZED SE-]>IM5/Jr
I l
�lrr ]� t7
a �
I
1 —
_
_
_
L
-PIT
SEDIMENT ,DESIGN
a
I C
I i
I
I t
I_.JOB
_NAME.t VMC=ELKIN
BASN�I
1.- � NUMBER
POND Ni 3.
i
---i-1
RATIIONAL METHOD
i
i! 1
}
�—
SiUMLMALRDATA
�rIT-_
.Si
.
...__�
.Y"O'F
A)�ENUDED AREA (ACRES.))
t
114 6711
1
f. i
I
DRAAAREA ACRES
II
42_III
I C)
I>
C FACOR I
'INTENSITY
—
( INCHES`IHOUR)
I-
6 S
:--
U)
F.
tlRb lfi UU I r Luw
'UF,S) 1-
65 i t i _
-
.__
I REQUIRED
,
,. 1
1
IVOLUME ;261406 cf
I -�
1 II--
1 .. ...,
I
y l
i SED
PUT
DIM F7. !ft DEEP
I
{x I.60 ftt_W,IDE
x J 7{O..�ft LDNG_I-1'-2 940Q.cf
I
29400 rE )i 94dOG
1 rf TNFRFFf)RP
nw i
r
—
L —
-
;--I+r:
--�
�
J
�' !
I11
r�
I
i
�
I
i I
}

- �..
f
s
F
r:;
-�

E1 �1l\1 GLu t\t P�
SEEDING PERMANENT GRASS AND LEGUMES ON CONSTRUCTION SITES
Definition
Seeding perenn'i.al grasacs and legumes un criLi.cal.:u:cos fnlr pearmvmnl cover.
Purpose
To stabilize the soil.; reduce damage from sedimcnL and runoff Lo downstrorun
areas, and improve an area for safety and beauty. -
Where Applicable
On sediment -producing, highly eroding or severelc eroding areas where
vegetation is difficult to establish with normal planting, methods; such n
construction s Les, cut and fill slopes, borrow ::rea:; and other areas damided
of vegetation where perennial vegetation is needed for long tern) protection.
Specifications Guide
A. Site Prauar:l on
1. Install needed surface water control measures
RECEIVE®
JUN u
LAND QUALITY SECTION
2, Grade and slope as feasible to use planned equipment for seeding,
mulching and maintenance. Slopes steeper than 3t1 are difficult to
establish vegauntion on and ma'i.nl:ai.n Wil'h r,mvenrional crp,i.lmir.ur.
Consider re Lnlll i.ng walls, ground cover pLnuL:;, vl.uns m: r;I¢ub:: nu
slopes of 3:1 or steeper.
3. Chisel compacted areas and spread available Lopso:i.l. 3" deep over
adverse soil conditions as a filial eperol:i.nn in gi.-tiding. Where
conventionalseeding equipment is to be used, rilp the entire area.
4. A minivaun of gi-nding and shaping is requi.rod when hydraulic ::ccdhgl
equipmenL is to he used.
5. Remove all loose rock, roots and other obstructions from the surface
that wi.1 1, .nterte.re with CS tabl, ishmenL and i. .ntounnco of vrp,r llnLi.nn.
Leave siu:[nuc reasonably smouth and unl.lorm l:nr li.nair.uodiod prcpalati.ua.
6. Perform all cultural operations of land preparation and seeding on the
general contour.
B. Lime, Fertilizer and Seedbed Preparation
1. When soil material is reasonably uni.f.onu, :ippl.y ]lime and fort!.l.i.zcr
according to Soli Lest report, In the absence of a soil. test apply
lime as follows:

Clay and c L:ty l o"t1 :;
Sandy looms, looms, silt loams
Loamy sands, sands
000 Sq. Pc.
2 90
1 50
Agricultural ILmu used shall be wi.thi.n flue np-ci.fLenttons of the
North Carolina Department of Agriculture.
2. Rates and nnalysis of fertilizer :if soi.1 rr�f:L not nvni.lrabl.e:
a. Grasses alone -- 800 to 1,000 pounds per: acre (18-23 pounds/
1,000 sq. ft.) of a 1-1-1 ratio such nr; a 1.0-10-10.
b. Legumes alone or grass and legume nti.r.ttal.c - 800 to .1.,000 pounds
per acre (18-23 pounds/1,000 sq. ft.) of a 1-2-2 ratio such as
5-10-10.
3. Phosphorous is essential for developing vigorous seeding root- systems.
If soil test is not available, apply 500 to 800 pounds (12-18 pounds/
1,000 sq. ft.) per acre of 2YT superphosphnte or equivalent in
addition to fcrt: i l i.zer listed above or unQ in nnnly;; Ls to supl)l.y tho.
additional phosphorous.
4. When hydraulic seeding equipment is used, no seedbed prepnrati.on is
required. Cut slopes and compacted area) mny require scarif i ention.
a. The fertilizer, seed and wood cellulose Fiber mulch will be mixed
t,rry s)a-cnd tho nrixtu t 1. with .v,itea: . „Cl applied i.. �. slurry. .� - i _ _ 1 f'_ l T!.l.f C)r Sll V
Over Lhe urea.
b. The :lime will be mixed with water and applied on top of straw
mulch or the lime may be combined with dw too, ch:css Li; when grass
is 2 to 4 :i.ncltes tall.
5. When conventi.onaL equipment is used, the lime and fertilizer will be
applied un:i.forntly and mixed with the soil during ,seedbed preparation.
a. On field conditions or slopes that arc 3!1 or flatter, prepare
a seedbed 4 inches deep, excluding rock.
b. On slopes steeper than 3:1, prepare n r,cc'dhcd I. to h i_ttcho"; dacp
as determined on site. Scarify the surface with strLUl>l.e equipment
such as a chain harrow, grader with chisels attached or by hand.
The :surface as a minimum will be pitted or trenched 4 to 8 inches
apart for seed to lodge and germinnim
Q. Continue tillage until a well pulverized, firm, reasonably uniform
seedbed Ls prepared.

C4 Seeding
Select species from attached table, consi.dcr: i.ng i loot ndnpL i.on to
desired use, site to be vegetated, seed 4"n dates ni"! ran i nLrn "co
requirements. Seed used sha11 he Inhel od t o Argo I:hry Nr n wtKin
the requi.r.cmems of the North CnroL Inn 1,gvrr1:nu2n1 .of. 11f;rlrirlrnr•(r a;
to purity, germination, and presence of unstricted of prohi.l kad weed;;.
Erosion control plans or seeding contrnct , sltouLd list species or
mixtures to be used, planting dates, seed germirintion and purity that
are acceptable.
1. Conventional. seeding - Seed on n froday prelynl-cd, 6.1-111 r.r r..clbr,d.
Use coWipment that will appLy seed uni Fnrnrl.y t0.rc1l CIA Li.i�ncl:rrr
seeder, drill, or cyclone seeder by bond. Cover seed I [ghl:l.y with
seeding equipment or ^..'u t{pack (ter �' g.
it 1. 1. t_. 1. ;; L: L: 11 ,L r1
2. Hydraulic seeding - Mix the fertilizer, sued nod wood r_r.l. Lu tone,
fiber: mulch with water and npply the sl.t.irry un.ifornlLy over the nru"a
being treated, The slurry trust be nppLi.ed wi.Lhin one hour after
mixing the seed with fertili.r.er.
3. Use the inoculant prepared specificnl.l y for ,)ny Legume being seeded.
Twice the recommended rate will be used when seeded dry with
conventional equipment and four times the recommended rite whr.n
seeded with hydraulic equipment:.
4. MuI.chi.ng - Mulch all permanent seedLngr r,n cr..i.ti_cnl. arnan immcd PLel.y
After seeding unless sufficient: moRh in i)rnrr-nL from pr-Onl.rr:
tcrnl,lW ry v"getation grown Hul.clr i :: :r;r;nt f n 4 t:O I,r-r l c r:t: r,rtr.d 1. f.iil;n
and area from erosion until plant cover is e,tnblishe'd. Refer to
MULCHING specifications for kinds, rlmounLs and anchor.ing mulch.
5. lrri.g,ntion -- Supplementary i.rrignAon cahYl sf7ued tilt the unQnhL1rhmPnL
of plant cover most seasons and may prrvent failure of seedings not
made at optimum planting date or seed ings on adverse si. n mmid i.t i min .
Where irri.gati.on is used, 1,7,11:er rrltrr,l-. I"! app1.i rid at: n r.r,l'r, HinI- wi I I
not cause soil. movement.
D. Treatment After seeding and maintenance Ls the most importnut contr.&L-
able frimor. Ln rnwining nn of fnr:t:i.vn vnno ri r• i vv rrl cr, 11, L• i ird "I'
grass or grnss-Legurne, soil, weather and the Lcvel. ol: rr,nnnl;r,lll'ut: t11tc,.
desires to give a seeding determine the fuuil.iznLi_on needed after the
first year.
1. Repairs - Inspect all seeded areas mid drake necesonry repnirs or-
reseedings within the planting seasQn, if possible. if sLnnd should
be over 60% damaged, reestablish following origirurl. 11mic, fert.iLi.zer
and seeding recontmendntions .
2. Control. weed growth during establishment iiiechinicnlly ntrd/or with
herbicides., When chemicals ore used, I-nLlow c;rlr:r.cnt 1lor lh Crir:ol.:i.n,i
Agrictilturn]. Experiment Station's wcad contr.oi. recr�nnnendnt.Lnn:: nrrcl
adhere strictly to instructions on thr Label.

D. 3. Lime
Apply lime according to soil test recommendations for plants
being grown. In the absence of a soil test, apply lime from
October to March every 4-5 years at rate of 2 tons per acre
(100 lbs/1,000 sq.ft.)
4. Fertilizer
Permanent seedings will be fertilized the next growing season
after planting. For the warm season plants, this would be early
spring (bermuda, Sericea, etc.); for the cool season plants, early
fall or early spring (tall fescue, bluegrass, etc.)
1, 1 oil test reports and
FoiloW a regular fertilizer program �Gts S.0 v.. ,�.� test �..
use being made of the vegetative cover. The following fertilization
guide is the minimum level that can be expected to maintain land
cover. For a quality turf that is mowed regularly, or is subject
to heavy use and/or irrigated, much higher fertilization rates will
be required.
a. Stand is primarly Tall Fescue, Bluegrass, and mixtures of Till
Fesuue-Red Fescue,_and similar cool season plants. Apply 500 pounds
per acre (12 pound's per 1,000 square feet) of 10-10-10, or its
equivalent in early fall annually. Additional fertilization
with nitrogen or a complete fertilizer is needed in early spring.
To reduce incidence of leaf diseases_ do not apply N on Fescue or
Bluegrass from May to mid August in hot humid areas.
b. Stands of Bermuda,_Bahia, Lovegrass and similar warm season grasses.
Apply 500 pounds per acre (12 pounds per 1,000 square feet) of
10-10-10 fertilizer or equivalent when the plants.start to green
up in the spring. Topdress with 60-90 pounds of'nitrogen per acre
(1-2 pounds per 1,000 square feet) during the growing season.
When the higher rate is used, apply in split applications.
c. Stands of Sericea Lespedeza, Crownvetch and similar legumes ' .
Fertilize in early spring with 500 pounds of 0-10-20, (12 punds
per 1,000 sq. ft.) or equivalent per acre, every 2-4 years.
d. Mixtures of Sericea Lespedeza, Fescue, Lovegrass, or Bermudagrass.
Fertilize in early spring with 500 pounds per acre (12 pounds
1,000 sq. ft.) of 5-10-10 or equivalent every 2-3 years. In
Fescue-Sericea-Lespedeza mixture, apply in the fall if the Sericea
Lespedeza is developing better than the Fescue.
e. Fescue -White Clover, Bluegrass -White Clover and similar mixtures.
Apply 500 pounds per acre (12 pounds per 1,000 sq. ft.) of 0-20-20
or equivalent in early fall. An additional application of nitrogen
or complete fertilizer will be needed in.the spring.'to keep plants
lush and in balance. Where grass is crowding out the clover,
reduce or eliminate spring application of nitrogen.

5. Mowing
Mow Sericea Lespedeza, or Sericea grass mixtures only after frost
or sericea seed are mature. Bluegrass should be mowed not closer
than 2 inches and Tall fescue not closer than 3 inches. Mow
Crownvel.ch oilLy when necessary Lc) coii(:n)l bu she,,,. :If mowing; is
done, it should not be lower than 12 inches. Bahia and the bermudas
may be mowed at any height desired.
Care should be taken not to damage the vegetation mechanically
through use of improper mowing equipment or by attempting to mow
with heavy equipment on steep slopes when the vegetation is lush and
slippery or when the ground is soft enough to be rutted by mower or
tractor wheels.
Where mowing fails to control weeds satisfactorily, apply chemicals
in accordance with current North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station's weed control recommendations and adhere strictly to
instructions on label.
CAUTION: Pesticides are dangerous. Use only ras directed ;in(] treed
all precautions on the container label. Check the registration
number and be sure that the directions for use include the target
pests. Drift from aerial spraying can contaminate nearby crops,
lakes, and reservoirs. Improper use and careless disposal of unused
portions can lead to poisoning of humans, domestic animals, desirable
plants, pollinating insects, fish, and wildlife and can contaminate
water supplies.

North Carolina Department of Environment. Health, and Naal Resources,t'
Division o1 Land Resources, Land Quality Sectioturn r ,/o
MINE INSPECTION REPORT MAR 21 19UI
//�-- (PERMITTED MINE) LAND QUNLII7 SECTION
1.MINENAME CL/fm/ Q.daR/ 2.MININGPERMIT#
3.OPERATOR !/ie r c4^1 144 re/AZ: c Co. 4. COUNTY
5.ADDRESS /O. Goal 4249, [,/-S,n/c 27//57"- AYr..I: F'/,/KL o.°t/.J
6. Person (s) contacted at SRO r ri Ur.JdC r c K C r-h Nc .Sa P CZe' rL n d tL 'T
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection 7 X Yes Lj No B. Pictures ? ❑ Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: l / S 1� 10. Any mining since last inspection? OYes NO
11. Is the mine in Compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Yes © No
If no, explain:
li n,r4v/�.aS nF �odOr Y/oAl��� ;
- nux'aG,JY a,srFrdc�e /s nlar' /•� A«a�eeAl�c
1. ), n/ 'TF/r_ /VPO!S BG ,cn/r' ISfue'd 6✓ Q.G F7. ,(C r/ri'eacc
A9rxto /a"nn kJ,0 .. r•oA( eJA red 7>.CM -/i-!/.)
TT /e 7-///7
Yn aG c-(.,A"s /F'/.n rr rr:NdA: /un/ J//4'r JVS .E� MUD/f rGO TO
F)B/: erC d; rJes Oc,Cn•rY F.D./C. /Vo D/1G////RG! /A4n /Aa.✓d s,
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? ❑ Yes ❑x No
If no, explain: 1/• o / Arro./s 26 v i 4 1
5"PLS 111C! Tile Ay 2 - 1 /•✓ 0/7L•CL4a"D A
AVlA409L A.CCd %r AG A•vs 11Ar7L -6eA/ SNdM/T zAO TO
l'VAAA)b P•r 7.N UrGw ni ar/S. SJ QI.!•NT/,JdF!U )' S7e770 �
A rr,AfC Sr nAL. AWGLLS ljoaZ6 '6e Ad XIA16 L')(AANS/onl.
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsRe damage ? Yes © No If yes, describe the type
and Severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed and-/•okakanY /- eox JlcT kL cr//'/ tb a 44r1e4/ U%
rro•J rrl / A/ie JL. Y 06Y4r.✓ /IP/.Co JAL n/ /9a d///fn>/a•✓
P/.a,Jer
70 1- /I.INt/eny,
15. Other recommendation and comments: hood Joss aF Aj,<zer146' 4oll /•Con
O/CA/.JGS D/s,aosd/ /?C4 , A)De PFTrd.✓ a/ rr/Alc S/rC l•vru
Std//re 7BdiS � /oon1D. Geog G)r./X' ad oA •' AH e
F/',
dal: f41O 00/JO, F.aed wae' 7aWAZ'd NaJ/NG 5+oC4A/G!5 BAdc F.[a.r LN-•CAd<C
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map accurate ? © Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
17, Follow-up inspection needed ? Yes No Proposed date
18. No. of additional �pages ofInspectionReport . 19. Copy of Report sent to operator .3 � /Zo 1
Q.
INSPECTED BY: /'"CL/.. �isocra�- DATE: J/ /cJ (dale)
Phone No:(9 iy)7%/- ZJ?S�
White copy to file YGIADW copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
aei

� �'C
F ,twAkDcO 70
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
C
February 15, 1991
de
s
c
(
�
°
�e49
° Po
iyyi
M E M O
R A N D U M
- - - -
- - - - - -
SFCljON
TO:
Doug Miller, WSRO Land Quality
Lee Spencer, WSRO Land Quality
,y, Q,
" "
THROUGH:
Steve Mooney, WSRO Water Quality /)
FROM:
Ab,Braddy, WSRO Water Quality ,k?
SUBJECT:
Vulcan Materials Elkin Quarry
N.C. Mining Permit 86-03
'
NPDES Permit No. NC0005371
I
have reviewed the material routed to me on the
subject
mining permit renewal, and offer the following:
1) With regard to Mike Poplin's letter of July 30..
1990, I was unaware that any modification to the
facility's NPDES permit had been requested. I
subsequently contacted Dale Overcash in the.Water
Quality Central Office, and he verified that the
modification request had been received in Raleigh
on August 2, 1990. Apparently, the request was
inadvertently misplaced, as an acknowledgement to
the request was not sent out until February 7,
1991.
2) The Company holds valid NPDES Permit No.
NC0005371.
3) The NPDES Permit in it's current form specifically
authorizes the Company to discharge water which
infiltrates into the quarry pit, and, moreto the
point, states that the settling ponds are to be
operated as a "closed circuit process water
treatment system".
4) The Company has no authority to discharge waste
water.from the settling basins (or for.that
matter, any wastewater) at the location of the
outfall shown on the 7/30/90 drawing.
5) The WSRO received a request from the Central
Office to perform an NPDES site evaluation and
staff report on February 11, 1991. I will be
contacting Vulcan Materials next week to arrange
the site meeting.

r

Doug Miller
Page #2
February 15, 1991
To sum up, this appears to be an attempt by the
permittee to make the NPDFS permit conform to his
activities, rather than vice --versa. Unless something
unanticipated is revealed during the site'investigat,ion, I
will recommend that the pit dewatering discharge be kept
segregated from water in the settling ponds. It will likely
be necessary to allow the Company to divert pit-dewater
liquid into the basins if they need to augment makeup water
volume, but.this should occur infrequently. Additionally,
this would need to be done only during dry periods, when
infiltration volumes into the quarry pit may well be lower.
As for the discharge from settling basin number three, it
must be permitted or ceased. Should the Company feel that
the basin may discharge during heavy rain events, they should
apply for an "002" outfall permit at the present discharge
location.
ASB/vm

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
iarnes G Marlin, Govemor
William W. Cobey,l r., Secretory
March 4, 1991
Mr. Mike Poplin
Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
P.O. Box 4239
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27115-4239
RE: Renewal and Modification of Mining Permit No. 86-03
Elkin Quarry
Sorry County
Dear Mr. Poplin:
Charles H. Gardner
Director
The initial review has been completed on your request to renew the above
referenced mining permit for another 10 year period and modify said permit to
add additional land, stockpile areas and the eastern pit expansion/road
relocation. The following items are in need of further clarification:
(1) You indicated in your January 3, 1990 letter that "certain areas to
the west of the quarry are to be added as permitted lands." Which
tracts are to be added? Are they to be added as "buffer lands" in
which no land disturbing activities are to take place until you have
submitted 'a detailed plan to and received approval from this office?
If so, an additional $50.00 processing fee is required as this
addition of "buffer land" is considered a minor modification not
already addressed by the existing mining permit or the $250.00 fee
covering the two stockpile additions and pit expansion/road
relocation. In addition, any new tracts to be added to the permit
must be clearly denoted on the mine map.
(2) The area currently covered by Mining Permit No. 86-03 must be clearly
delineated on the mine map. In addition, those areas to be added as
noted above in item 1 must also be indicated on the map by another
method to clarify the area to be renewed and the area to be
added/modified to the existing mining permit.
(3) Item Al of the application indicated that the total acreage at the
site to be covered by this permit (after renewal and modification) is
to be 241.3 acres. However, after evaluating the area outlined on the
mine map, I have calculated 244.79 acres. Please clarify this
discrepancy.
P.O. Box 27667 • Raleigh. NC 77611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Amm7ative Acdon Employer

Mr. Poplin
March 4, 1991
Page 2
(4) You indicated in your January 3, 1990 letter that you have contacted
the Corps of Engineers (COE), met with them onsite to review your
proposal, and that no COE permits are necessary. Please provide this
office with copies of any COE correspondence that supports the above.
(5) Undisturbed buffer zones must be provided on the mine map for all
sides of the mining operation between said operation and any property
lines, streams, lakes, rivers, highway right-of-ways, etc.
(6) Although your company has indicated that "Danger Open Pit -No
Trespassing" signs will be placed around the perimeter of the
operation at a 100 yard spacing, this office feels that said spacing
is too wide and may not be sufficient to prevent inadvertent public
entry. This office recommends a minimum spacing of 25 yards for these
signs.
(7) On Sheet No. 3, Emergency Spillway and Cross -Sections, it was
indicated in the construction sequence that an eight (8) foot high
earthen berm and a barbed wire fence are proposed along the west side
of the relocated haul road. However, these structures have not been
located 6n the mine map and the Cross -Section at East Side Road
detail. Furthermore, details for both the construction of the fence
and the berm must be provided in addition to the above.
(8) A typical detail/cross-section must be provided on the mine map that
indicates the minimum 25 foot buffer, the overburden slope angle of
2H:1V, the 10 foot wide bench in overburden with every 25 feet of
elevation change, the minimum 20 foot wide safety bench at the toe of
the overburden slope and the top of rock, and the 12 degree bank slope
offset from vertical with a 30 foot wide bench at 80 foot intervals in
rock.
(9) The Seeding Specifications provided on Sheet No. 3 dated June 26, 1990
do unt rnrresperd with the Revegetation Plan provided in the renewal
application form approved by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) on
December 19, 1990. If you intend to use the SCS approved plan, the
Seeding Specifications on Sheet No. 3 must he deleted. In addition.
please be sure that ryegrain is proposed in the plan rather than
ryegrass. Furthermore, seedbed preparation specifications must also
he provided with the Revegetation Plan.
(10) The pit expansion proposed on the northeast side of the existing
excavation has not been clearly addressed on the mire map and Erosion
and Sedimentation Control Map. In addition, will any sediment and
erosion control measures be required? If so, please indicate their
locations on the maps and provide supporting details and calculations
for each proposed measure.

Mr. Poplin
March 4, 1991
Page 3
(11) Because of the relocation of the road to the east and the installation
of Stockpile Area "A", both in close proximity to adjoining property
lines and/or rights -of -way, the opportunity exists for construction of
vegetated earthen berms in these two areas to screen these areas from
public view. Please address this issue as two rows of trees in the 25
foot buffer along Stockpile Area "A" may not be adequate by itself.
(12) It appears from the maps that little or no buffer zone or visual
screening is proposed along the adjoining property line at Stockpile
Area "B". Please address this issue on the maps.
(13) The fill slopes in Stockpile Area "A" have not been addressed by the
Cross -Section at Stockpile Area "A" detail. In addition, how will
surface water runoff be conveyed down the fill slopes to prevent
erosion problems? Will slope drains be provided? The minimum slope
for all fill slopes must be 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter.
(14) Additional information is needed for Settling Pond No. 3 and the
existing pond immediately north of Stockpile Area "B" to ensure that
these structures are sufficient to handle the surface water runoff as
well as sediment load from their corresponding upstream activities.
(15) The direction of surface water runoff from the existing stockpile area
must be delineated on the mine maps and appropriate measures designed
and provided to prevent offsite sedimentation. Some problems have
occurred in the past several years, particularly near the quarry
entrance, where sediment runoff exited the quarry property without
being properly filtered.
(-i5) The S&E l.oniroI rr i an must spec ifi ca i I ind1c8te ihai ail runoff frnr1
Stockpile Area "B" will be directed southeast to the inlet end of
Permanent Ditch No. 1 andnot over the fill slope. In addition,
construction details are needed for the 18 inch CPP slope drain.
(17) Typical construction details are needed for all temporary and
permanent ditches, sediment basins, slope drains, earthen berms,
barbed wire fences, outlet protection/energy dissapators, etc. It is
recommended that charts be provided with the details to clearly
outline each measure's dimensions and stabilization.
Furthermore, the clearing limits for the road relocation must be .
indicated on the maps as well as erosion/sediment control measures,
berms, fences, etc. along the western boundary of said road. How will
runoff from the relocated road and adjacent areas be handled after the
temporary ditches are removed?

Mr. Poplin
March 4, 1991
Page 4
(18) Temporary Ditch No. 7 and Permanent Ditches Mos. 8, 9, and 30 have not
been located on the SdE Control Plan. In addition, no design
calculations have been provided for Ditch Nos. 7 and 8.
(19) An installation detail must be provided for the North American Green
Temporary Lining S150. Said detail must include staple spacing.
(20) Please specify the class of rip -rap to be used for each d5n size
specified. Does your company manufacture each of these specific
sizes?
(21) All existing erosion and sediment control measures must be indicated
on the mine map.
(22) It appears that you have requested to DEM that they moQify your
current NPDES permit to allow a discharge since revise%lsaid permit
previously did not allow one. As a result, our Winston-Salem Regional
Office LQS staff has routed a copy of your proposal to DEM for their
review and comment (see attached copy of DEM's 02/15/91 review
comments). Please provide evidence that you have addressed these
concerns.
(23) Regarding groundwater at the site, please contact Janet Russell,
Groundwater Section/DEM, Winston-Salem Regional Office at (919)
761-2351 for her assistance in determining the number and placement of
monitoring wells around the perimeter of the quarry site. In lieu of
the above, your company will be required to address the items outlined
in her memorandum to me dated February 19, 1991 (copy attached).
Please clarify your intentions.
(24) The Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) has reviewed your proposal and
has offered several recommendations (see attached copy of WRC's
January 23, 1991 memo to me).
In order to continue processing your request for renewal and
modification of Mining Permit No 86-03, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Mr. Poplin
March 4, 1991
Page 5
Please advise if.you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
dra c Davis, E.I.T.
Mini Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/sl
Attachments: February 15, 1991 memorandum from DEM-WSRO, Water Quality
Section
February 19, 1991 memorandum from DEM-WSRO, Groundwater
Section
January 23, 1991 memorandum from WRC
cc: Mr. Doug Miller/Mr. Lee Spencer, LQS, WSRO
Mr. Ab Braddy, WQ, WSRO
Ms. Janet Russell, GS, WSRO
Mr. Fred Harris, WRC

EMo
GATE:
TO: T/"7�JL� L.�J✓�S SUBJECT:
s,z r
���P6AipyS 'S9,
FoTlay
c Y oA1Ea
f3s North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES /'�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT C4r111£
February 15, 1991 44*0 C01 O
MEMORANDUM SAC/n'sEN
TO: Doug Miller, WSRO Land Quality
Lee Spencer, WSRO Land Quality lL
THROUGH: Steve Mauney, WSRO Water Quality
,"\"
FROM: Ab Braddy, WSRO Water Quality
SUBJECT: Vulcan Materials Elkin Quarry
N.C. Mining Permit 86-03
NPDES Permit No. NC0005371
I have reviewed the material routed to me on the
subject mining permit renewal, and offer the following:
11 With regard to Mike Poplin's letter of Julv 30.
1990, I was unaware that any modification to the
facility's NPDES permit had been requested. i
subsequently contacted Dale Overcash in the Water
Quality Central Office, and he verified that the
modification request had been received in Raleigh
on August 2, 1990. Apparently, the request was
inadvertently misplaced, as an acknowledgement to
the request was not sent out until February 7,
1991.
2) The Company holds valid NPDES Permit No.
NC0005371.
3) The NPDES Permit in it's current form specifically
authorizes the Company to discharge water which
infiltrates into the quarry pit, and, more to the
point, states that the settling ponds are to be
operated as a "closed circuit process water
treatment system".
4) The Company has no authority to discharge waste
water from the settling basins (or for that
matter, any wastewater) at the location of the
outfall shown on the 7/30/90 drawing.
5) The WSRO received 'a -request from the Central
Office to perform an NPDES site evaluation and
staff report on February 11, 1991. I will be
contacting Vulcan Materials next week to arrange
the site meeting.

Doug Miller
Page #2
February 15, 1991
To sum up, this appears to be an attempt by the
permittee to make the NPDES permit conform to his
activities, rather than vice -versa. Unless something
unanticipated is revealed during the site investigation, I
will recommend that the pit dewatering discharge be kept
segregated from water in the settling ponds. It will likely
be necessary to allow the Company to divert pit-dewater
liquid into the basins if they need to augment make-up water
volume, but this should occur infrequently. Additionally,
this would need to be done only during dry periods, when
infiltration volumes into the quarry pit may well be lower.
As for the discharge from settling basin number three, it
must be permitted or ceased. Should the Company feel that
the basin may discharge during heavy rain events, they should
apply for an "002" outfall permit at the present discharge
location.
ASB/vm

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Land Resources Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cohey, Jr. Secrets Land Quality Section
n' Regional Manager
January 28, 1990
14 OS ly
P�iq[�rys
MEMORANDUM E'r/Q19
TO: Tracy Davis
State Mining Specialist
FROM: Doug Miller
WSRO
RE: Permit Renewal - Vulcan Materials
Elkin Quarry #86-3
Surry Countv
Lee Spencer and I have reviewed the application of Vulcan
Materials for a renewal at their Elkin Quarry. Please find as
follows our comments about this application and the proposed
modification.
A.5. Previously affected lands, lands to be mined,
lands in other uses, etc. have not been adequately
Y - delineated'on their mine map. The map defines
parcels, but does not break down the use of those
parcels. ( The map is not in compliance with map
��' size on page 1 of appl.ication)�4tA_ tr'_�'"
Y�wrr �++- /� L � A- 1- Ft z�, rJ91 fir
,(,2f b,2. � Areas affected sho d be delineated and correspond
a04^' with the attached maps.
V"'(3) C.4.a.r B-Afer to be left should be an undisturbed buffer
and clearly delineated on mine maps.
(4) C.4.b. Spacing of signs at 100 yards seems quite wide and
could permit inadvertent entry.
2�
6025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106-3203 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

471
/////W w a �kv
(5) C.4.c. Details on construction oy fenceishould be
,� provided in the mine plant Also an earthen berm
will not provide the same protection of a fence to
keep out people. Also see #4 above.
jkr C.S. Existing map is not of sufficient scale nor has
..VP n
m- Qadequate topographic detail to determine adequacy
p pof measures. Present active areas, along with
anticipated new construction, should be properly
it;Ij identified on plans with specific notation that
grading in areas other than these will be preceded
with additional plans for such work and approval
by us prior to it starting.
h° w s&,.4" J'
✓(7) C.6.a. {" A slope angle of 2H:IV and a slope with a 10 foot
& b. bench every 25 feet of elevation change with an
overall final overburden slope of 2H:IV can be two
d'. ent items and therefore should be clarified.
6 in a d, X 44-pb r )
V,(8) Seeding mixture on sheet 3 of plans for "Emergency
spillway and cross -sections" dated June 26, 1990
do not agree with seeding mixtures in the
application. Rye grass should be eliminated from
the,seeding mixture.
✓(9) �-1 preparation specifications are needed on the
plan sheets.
( sgimping and/or tacking of mulch must be added to
&
Q,p', seeding specifications on the plan sheets.
Existing mine limit is open on the south end of
mine map.e&H �.y.r"�04K-fue.u-.,ir*'•f rfv. �'ja.. SJEA*�
Y " What is the significance of the line around part
of the plant area, stockpile area and shop area on
the mine map?X &y JG..,kW44U,4�74�Aa, -kwjL. „/!_sw
(13) The mine map does not show "future" mining limit, /ar+��-
i.e. expansion to the northeast which is why the Mom)
road along the east side is being relocated. This
is shown on the S&E Control Plan, but should also
be shown on the mine map.ae,,)t�y,E

- 3 -
By scaling the mine map, additional area affected by
this permit is:
Stockpile Area A - 1.4 acres
t,
Stockpile Area B - 6.9 acres.
a
# Road relocation and pit expansion 5.0 acres
t�,`
� 13.3 acres total
,/(15) With relocation of road to the east and work at
Stockpile A Area, opportunity exists to construct berms
to screen operation further from public view. A 25'
buffer with 2 rows of trees is not adequate in most
cases.
�(16} Little or no buffer or screening is specified for
property line nearest Stockpile Area "B".
,�/17) The fill slope on Stockpile "A" is not addressed in the
cross-section. How is runoff to be prevented from
flowing over fill slope and causing an erosion problem?
The maximum slope for all slopes on sheet 3 should be
shown as 2H:ZV.
,/'(18 ) Supp.9 " ca�l�culat o�shou�be provided for all
exi tang and proposed sediment and erosion control
d vices showing adequate hydraulic and sediment
retention capacities are available.( This is
v particularly needed for settling pond #3 and pond at
spillway 1 near Stockpile Area "B")
L/19) All runoff from stock pile areas should be clearly
delineated as to where it goes. Some problems have
occurred in the past, particularly near the entrance,
where runoff left the quarry without being filtered.
A good detail is needed for temporary sediment basin
'kU4- construction proposed on S&E Control Plan.
ZZ
�/21) The S&E Control Plan should specifically note and
indicate that runoff from Stockpile Area "B" will be
directed southeast to the entrance of the permanent
ditch No. 1 (and hence will not flow over the fill
slope). Calculations for a slope drain are provided
though none is specifically shown on the plan.

V(22) The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the road
relocation should be detailed much more thoroughly
including C"eari-i na .l-rmts, plan rof ile of road, cross
section and calculate ns onfall ditchlines and energy
dissipato��_.
✓(23) The 8' high berm referenced in Introduction on sheet 3
"Emergency Spillway and Cross -Sections" is not shown on
the plan or on cross-section for east side road. See
also items, 4, 51 15, 16 above. fe�.,/-
✓l24) How will runoff from relocated east road and adjacent
areas be handled after temporary ditches are removed?
,,CC See 22 above also.
,J/5) Installation detail with staple spacing shown should be
provided for North American Green Temporary Lining
S150.
,/(26) Permanent ditches 9 & 10 are not located on plan
sheets. See 22 above. lx&k%Aw-7 4- R I
V(27) Please specify the class of rip rap to be used for each
d size specified or does Vulcan manufacture that size
sUcifically.
,✓i28) All existing permanent sediment controls for the mine
site should he shown on the plan.
V29) They have asked for a change in their NPDES permit.
This apparently allows a discharge where they
previously did not. This should be discussed more
thoroughly with Water Quality. We are routing file to
DEM.
It is hoped these comments will aid your review.
Significant additional information and clarification of existing
information is needed. If this office can further assist you,
contact Lee or myself.
GDM/MPF

UM (/ - Cuo') deahm/ l z�2G�91
r• N .. .e IU I Y Ii

UU11an
Materials Company
January 3, 1990
Mr. Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Environmental Health & Natural Resources
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Renewal of Permit No. 86-3
Elkin
Dear Mr. Davis:
We request the above referenced permit to be renewed for ten addi-
tional years. Enclosed are duplicate copies of our application, mine map
and details, and processing fee pursuant to our request. Also, design
calculations to support the control measure in stockpile areas A and B are
included.
The following comments supplement our application:
1. Certain areas to the west of the quarry are to be added as per-
mitted lands.
2. A natural wooded buffer will be retained along the western
boundary of stockpile A.
3. Stockpile area B will be filled with settling pond dippings and
soil overburden.
4. The road east of the quarry, proposed for relocation, is private
and controlled by Vulcan. No screening is therefore proposed. Either a
boulder barrier or quardrail will be provided for safety considerations.
5. We contacted the Corps of Engineers and met on site regarding
our proposal-, no corps permits are necessary.
During our preparation of this renewal application, we have found no
conflicts with any requirements of the Mining Act of 1971. Furthermore,
we do not anticipate any of our mining activities involving any of the
seven denial criteria listed in G.S. 74-51.
MIDEAST DIVISION / P.O. BOX 4239 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

Ms. Tracy Davis - Renewal of Permit No. 86-3
January 3, 1991
Page 2
Should you have questions during your review, please contact me at
[phone], ext. 2760.
Sincerely,
G `r
Robert (dike) Poplin
Environmental Engineer
vdj
Pnrinciira• r'harlr Nn 91AP77 �Knn nn
cc: Russ Willard

FORM NO S I''-4ULI1
Vu1dan
MIDEAST DIVISION
P.O. DRAWER 4195
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA' 27115-4195
SUPPLIER'S
INVOICE NO.
INVOICE DATE
OUR
ENTRY NO,
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
MO.
DAY
YR.
500.00
STATEMENT OF REMITTANCE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

R6
FORM NO 919- 01 MIDEAST DIVISION
Vulcan PO DRAVAR 4 195
SUMLIERI
INVOICE No
INVOICE DATE
OUR I
ENTRY NO,
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
NETAMOUNT
NO
I DAY
I YR.
Joi
1
04
13
L? 35>Z-
5.)0100
STATEMENT OF REMITTANCE
<T
RMelensle
any,
MIDEASf,bIVISION/P.O-Dh J1
% A t
CHECK NO
E
Q. 4c
NV f.� A
'� Ep4T;XL,CA':
PAY PO BIjx 2.1 ' 6
TOTHE III, KlliC El N
ORDER
OF
VON) AYTE A 60 DAYS
H
DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
4
a't I IV
FL

P6-6F, D
�4N 0 VF
/ar�� n ai ry �9g7
APPLICATION FOR SFCTj�N
NORTH CAROLINA MINING
PERMIT
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
rev. 3/se

"FC, i��
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNS�Jj,`.£j�D&9�PNE 1
LAND QUALITY SECTION 4ij9,9�
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PRRMI RCNEWA SFCj�O�
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Nine Elkin Quarry County Surry
2. Name of Applicant Vulcan Materials COmoanv
3. Permanent address .for receipt of official mail.
Winston-Salem. NC 27115 *Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address P, 0. Sox 71
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Tim Hendrix
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application
are true and correct to the best of our knowledge. We fully understand that
any willful misrepresentation of fa� will be cause for permit revocation.
**Signature �/LJ�_' '_G��1�t __— Date_ 1AIVII a
Print Name
*The Land Quality Section should be notified of change in permanent address or
telephone number.
*Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a
permit within 60 days of receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing
_s helA within an day= following the hearing and the filing_ of anv supplemental
information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all
required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach
additional sheets as needed.

zi
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. GENERAL CFIARACPERISTICS OF MINE.
1. Total acreage at site covered by this permit application: Z141.3 'PotaL
Acres owned 68.2 Acres leased 173.08 Property owner if leased
Greenwood - 154.6 ac. Rose - 18.5 ac
2. Name of all materials mined: Granitic Schist
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground Shovel&
Truck X Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper.
Other (explain)
5. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet):40D`- from. Reference elevation: 950t
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 300'1
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No_ If no, pro -
reed to Question 6.
a. Acreage of previously affected land(s) at present site that has not been
reclaimed: 43 acres (identify all areas on your mine map).
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted? .Prior to and since 1970,
VHC
c. Acreage of previously affected land at present site that has been reclaimed:
.0 - acres (identify all areas on youi mine map).
d. When and by whom was this activity conducted?
e. Do you wish to exclude any areas noted in 5a or from this permit application?
Yes No . X If yes, how much? _ acres (identify all
areas on your mine map).
6. Present (premining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 42 ac Pasture ac"Forestry 145 ac Fish/Wildlife ac
Recreation_ ac Other 54.3 ac Active mine area.
7. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed
(estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 42 ac Pasture 24.3 ac*Ferestry 75 ac Fish/Wildlife 100 ac
Recreation ac Other ac *Forestry includes naturally wooded
areas as well as any planted for
B. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND timber or pulpwood.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested (10 years maximum). LU
2. Total affected acreage to be disturbed during initial year of operation:
a. Area
used
for
tailing ponds
3.00
acres
b. Area
used
for
stockpiles
17.05
acres
c. Area
used
for
waste piles
10.00
acres
d. Area
used
for
processing plants and onsi.te haul roads
t.40
acres
e. Area
of mine
excavation(s)
22.Su
acres
I. TOTAL
a-e
54.25
acres
3. Estimate. the maximum amount of land to be disturbed and unreclaimed
at any one time during the life of the permit. 7U acres
a

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Check acreage to be bonded*: Total affected acreage.figure from B2f OR B3 (page 2)
whichever is larger, equals acreage to be bonded. (See 15 NCAC 5B.0003 for bond
amounts.)
0 - 4.99 acres 10 -- 24.99 acres
5 - 9.99 acres X 25 + acres
5. a. Will you file a blanket bond or other security covering all of your
mining operations in North Carolina? Yes X No
b. Have you already filed a blanket bond or other security? Yes X No
6. List any mining permits previously issued to the applicant. See attached
sheet.
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water,
or other waste water handling? Yes X No I If yes, briefly
describe all such processes including any chemicals to be used.
Wash water from stone processing is treated by (3) settling basins. This
is normally a closed circuit process water treatment system which is
included in our permit No. NC0005371. However., we have requested a revision
of our permit to allow for a discharge. See attachments.
b. Will the operation involve dewatering the mine or discharging fresh or waste
water from the mine or plant. Yes X No If yes, briefly
descrihP the nature of the discharge and locate all proposed discharge points
on your mine map.
Surface water run-off and groundwater infiltrate are collected in the pit
sump. This water and process water after further treatment in (3) settling
ponds, are discharged by permit No. NCO005371 recently requested for
revision. See attachment.
c. If you answered yes to either la or 1b, provide evidence that you have applied
for or obtained a water quality permit from the Division of Environmental
Management, Water Quality Section.
Copy of existing permit No. NC0005371.attached.
"In lieu of the surety bond required by this section, the operator may file with the
Department a cash deposit, negotiable securities, a mortgage of real property
acceptable to the Department, or an assignment of a savings account in a North
Carol:ina barn: on an assignment form prescribed by the Department. The amount of
land disturbed and unreclaimed at any one time must not exceed the bonded amount.
3

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions?
Yes X No If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied
for or have obtained an air quality permit issued by the Division of
Environmental Management, Air Quality Section or local governing body.
Air quality permit No. 2661R-6 application attached
b. How will fugitive dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc. be controlled?
Fugitive dust will be controlled on haul roads by use of a water truck.
Water will be applied at the appropriate areas throughout the crushing
circuit as well by the use of spray bars. Stockpile dust will be
controlled by the use of portable rainbird sprinklers, water truck or
other appropriate measures.
3. Describe in detail the chronological sequence of land disturbing activities and
reference the sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
All affected areas are currently active and permitted. Additionally,
erosion control measures relating to the stockpile areas (A) and (B)
and the road relocation east of the pit, will be installed per the
enclosed plan.
4

!1IOR'T11 CAROLI11A t•11t1E PElUIL'TS
1.1111C 11111.1E
NORTH
PIEDMONT
STOKESDALE
SHELTON
GREYSTONE
ELKIN
ENKA
115 QUARRY
PINEVILLE
EAST LORSYTH
SOUTH FORK
421 (QUARRY
CYCLE
PILOT MOUNTAIN
�t ��a�a�r�.nr.ar�r�rr ♦ �+
lll'.ND 1 SON Y ILLL'
SMITH GROVE
WHITAKERS
TIER RIVER
158 SAND VLKHT
t1OORESVILLE
STONEVILLE
1300NE
GOLD HILL
MORGANTON
ROCKINGum
CABARRUS
rE1111I.•T 11liHBER
34--2
34-3
17-1
9L-L
86 -3
11-3
97-2
6U-5
34-5
36--4
34-1
99-1
05--3
r r i
30--3
64-2
39-3
30-7_
49-4
79-9
95-1
12-2
77-1
13-7.7

410HIII CAROL111A 411.11E PERM IS - Continued
MINE IIM E
Weaverville
High Shoals
Yadkin
CLIUIIT UU4111CR
11-08
36-24
99-06

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity
and any adjoining property or highway right-of-way? Show all buffers on mine
map(s).
A sufficient buffer will be•maintained between any excavation and any
adjoining property line to prevent caving of that property. The present
pit development will have a 25 foot buffer along the property line as
will subsequent mine activities. A 50 foot buffer will be retained along'
highway right of ways, except as noted.
b, Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard
to any neighboring dwelling house, public road, public, commercial or
.industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such structures on the
mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
Slopes will be placed on no steeper than 2:1 ratios and will be properly
revegetated. Posted signs "Danger Open Pit - No Trespassing" will be
placed around the perimeter of the operation at a 100 yard spacing.
c. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public
entry along any high wall area and when it will be implemented.
A 4' high wire fence.or earthen berm is in place and will be mainCained
around the high wall area.
5

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. Describe specific erosion and sediment control measures to be taken during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for erosion
control for mine excavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas),
and give a detailed sequence of installation. Locale and label.'all erosion and
sediment control measures on the mine map. Engineering designs and calculations
shall be required when needed to justify the adequacy of any proposed measures.
Existing erosion and sediment control measures and those proposed in the
enclosed plan, upon approval, will be installed and maintained sufficiently
to prevent offsite sedimentation. See subject plan for the location, design
and calculations.
G a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to
adjoining properties during mining.
A 25 foot buffer, a slope angle of 2H:1V, and revegetation will prevent
landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining properties during
mining.
b. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle
of all slopes including specifications for benching and sloping.
Overburden slopes shall have a 10 foot bench incorporated with every 25
feet of elevation change.
Final overburden slopes will be at a 2H:1V slope angle.
c. In hardrock evacations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet.
Twelve degree bank slope offset from vertical with a 30 foot wi.dc bench
at 80 foot intervals. (Approximate)
2

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
7. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes_ No X if yes, list all such
minerals, their relative abundance and indicate their hocation(s) on the mine
map. How will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste
areas be controlled?
8. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening
the operation from public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes
or other vegetation, building berms or other measures. Show the location of
all visual screening on the mine map and provide cross -sections through all
proposed berms.
The quarry site is located in a rural area surrounded by broad areas of trees.
A minimum of 25 feat is to be left as buffer between the property Line and any
quarrying activity. Given the topography of the surrounding land and the
expanse of wooded areas, no problems are foreseen with respect to screening
quarry activities from public view. Vulcan Materials Company will implement
any measures required in this area should they become necessary.
9. Will explosives be used? YesX No If yes, specify the types
of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent
physical hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or
excessive air blasts or ground vibrations. Locate the nearest offsite
structure(s) to the proposed excavation(s) on the mine map.
Explosives will be utilized to extract the rock from the earth; there is no
alternative'to this. The principal explosive material is ammonium nitrate,
commonly used as fertilizer. Each shot will be monit6red by a seismograph
which makes a permanent record of all. components of the bust. The seis-
mograph tapes are used to analyze shots and aid in the design of: i.mpr.oved
blast design. Permanent records are maintained on each shot which indicate
the shot pattern, loading, delays, time, weather and all other pertinent
data.
7 continued)

(page 7, continued)
9. All drilling and blasting will be conducted in accordance with all
applicable United States Bureau of Mines and North Carolina Standards,
and upon recommendations of our consultants. Distance to the closest
dwelling is approximately 600 feet.

10. a. what is the pre -mining depth (in feet) to the seasonal high and low ground
water tables? High ft. Low ft. What is the source(s) of this
information?
Pre -mining ground water table fluctuation not observed or recorded.
b. Will'any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
Yes X Na If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes
No If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring
wells? Locate all existing wells on the mine map that lie within 500 feet of
the proposed permit area. Provide data to support any conclusions or
statements made.
Past experience at similar locations indicates that quarry development
will have no detrimental impact on any well in the area.
11. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site?
Yes X No If yes, describe these materials and how they will be stored
and show the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map.
a. The chemicals and petroleum products anticipated for use are:
1. Gasoline
2. Diesel fuel
3. Engine, gear and waste oil
4. Hydraulic fluid
5. Greases
6. Antifreeze
7. Fuel. conditioner
Eight (8) registered underground storage tanks are used to store the bulk
of petroleum products. Small quantities are also stored in secure drums
and three (3) small above -ground heating oil tanks.
(continued)
0

(Page 8, continued)
b. The use of all of the above products are required for routine quarry plant
and equipment operation. All storage tanks for the above products shall
conform to all Local, State, and Federal guidelines. All plant personnel
are briefed periodically on the SPGC plan and spill prevention is a topic
• at safety meetings. Spent oils and antifreeze are collected in compliance
with Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. The spent materials
are disposed of by an EPA approved and permitted waste handling firm.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
I. Describe your intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all
affected lands and indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this
land. This information must be illustrated on a reclamation map.
Reclamation of Vulcan's quarries is an ongoing process. Through onsite
inspections, Vulcan Materials Company will monitor, on a periodic basis,
the site for areas that need work in erosion control, and offsite
sedimentation. After the mining operation has ceased, all of the affected
land will be placed back to as natural a grade as possible. These lands
will be sloped for drainage, contoured, graded, and seeded per the approved
seed mix.
2. a. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the
reclamation? Yes X No If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s)
of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled cross -sections)
through the proposed body(s) of water. Will the body(s) of water be stocked
with fish? Yes No X . If yes, specify species.
b. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water
collecting or remaining in mined areas. Provide details on any permanent
water outlets.
Routine environmental inspection of the site will include sampling of
water bodies to ensure a high standard of water quality.
i]

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
completed excavations in rock including what kind of.permanent barricade
will be left. The location of the barricade must be shown on the reclamation
map.
A perimeter fence and warning signs are maintained around all excavations.
Additionally, a minimum 20 foot safety bench will ,be Left along the top
bench around any new expanded pit areas.
4. a. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or
other such on -site mine waste areas, including specifications for benching
and sloping.
'Overburden, ref -use, spoil VQ11ns, or VLeler mine wail-C, areas eA:L .74.LL1g U4
reclamation will be'graded and compacted to slopes of 2:1 or flatter and
will be vegetated 'in accordance with the attached seeding schedule. 'Che areas
will be graded to prevent pooling and stagnation of water and to control
storm water runoff.
b. Are any processing waste, overburden or other such mine wastes to be disposed
of off -site? Yes X No If yes, describe in detail what these
wastes are and how they will be disposed. Attach a separate site map(s) showing
the location(s) of the disposal area(s). Include all specifications for erosion
and sediment control.
Overburden material, and manor quantities of tailings from the wash settling
ponds not needed for berm construction will be available as fall material
for nearby construction activities. A considerable 'amount of overburden
material has been used in this manner at many of: our. locations.
10

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities; stockpile areas, and
onsite roadways.
The area occupied by the processing facilities, stockpiles, and on
site roadways will be re -graded and contoured back to the: original
ground contours where possible. These areas will then be seeded per
approved seed mix.
b. Will any onsite roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No
If yes, identify these on the reclamation map and provide details on
permanent ditch line stabilization.
The main access road into the property is to be .left intact. The ditch
lines are to be rip -rapped, and/or seeded to prevent erosion.
The main haul road and service roads will remain for vehicular access to
the lake formed j' the Thee roads hall L_ l_ l ! 1 while
,.
' _ „y ... pit. oc. rvau� s1�c111 ut= Jtr1iJ11,i,G�:ll white tine
quarry is active. The roads and their need for maintenance will be
determined by the future use of the site after the operation has ceased.
6. State the method of reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment
control basins.
once these control measures have served their. Mended purposes and
contributory drainage areas are stabilized, they will be filled in,
contoured and revegetated per the attached specifications.
]]
i

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
i
%. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap
metal, junk machinery, cables, or other such waste products of,mining. (Note
definition of refuse in The !lining Act -of 1971). No off --site generated waste
shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written approval from the N.C.
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Land Quality Section
and either the N.C. Department of Human Resources or local governing body.
All generated waste,.oils, and chemicals will be properly removed and disposed
of by professional agencies.
All junk machinery, scrap metal, cables, and other waste are removed per-
iodically as an ongoing function of the operation.
All scrap and waste products shall be disposed of in accordance with all
local, State and Federal regulations.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of any permanent drainage
channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution.
Give design details including typical cross -sections of any permanent channels
to be constructed as part of the reclamation nian. S i-w t location'
r_�.. ham,. she �vLa�xc,nt 5 j of all
permanent channels on the reclamation map.
Upon reclamation of the property, the erosion control structures will be in
good working order. All permanent channels, sediment basins, etc. will be
cleaned and stabilized.
12

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
9. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected
areas. This plan must include recommendations for time of seeding and the amount.
and type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre and general seeding
instructions for permanent revegetation and, if necessary, temporary revegetatiort_
Revegetation utilizing pine seedlings only is not acceptable. NOTE: Revegetation
Plan must be approved and signed by one of the following:
(a) Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District having jurisdiction over lands in question;
(b) Authorized representatives of the Office of Forest Resources, Department of
Natural. Resources and Community Development;
(c) County Agricultural Extension chairmen or Research and Extension
personnel headquartered at North Carolina State University in the School of
Agriculture and Life Sciences;
(d) North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
(e) Private consulting foresters referred by the Office of Forest
Resources, Department of Natural Resources and Community Development;
(f) others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION:
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION:
SEED - TYPES(S) AND RATE OF APPLICATION INCLUDING SEEDING SCHEDULE:
See attached Revegetation Plan.
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION:
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS:
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature
Title
Agency
Date
13

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RE CLARAT I ON PLAN
10. Provide a schedule of reclamation that indicates the sequence of
reclamation and approximate time frame. If reclamation is to be accomplished
concurrently with mining, then show on the site map segments that are to be
mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit. Add drawings showing typical
sections or cross -sections and layout of proposed reclamation.
At this time, it is not possible or feasible to establish a specific re-
clamation .schedule. However, reclamation activities are expected to
commence once a decision is made to terminate mining at thl,s ,ito nild would
continue and be completed well within the two (2) year, mandatory period.
Typically, pit and plant areas would be first reclaimed, stockpiles would
be depleted and finally roads, shop and maintenance areas, stockpiles and
other sections would be reclaimed.
E . NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
1. The "NOTICE" form or a facsimile thereof attached to this application must be
sent certified or registered mail to all adjoining (contiguous) landowners
indicated on mine map unless another means of notice is approved in advance
by the Director, Division of Land Resources.
The completed "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be
submitted before the application is considered complete.
14

Elkin Quarry
Surry County
REVEGATATION PLAN
Spring -Fall -Winter Seed Mixes
SPRING RATE: March - June
Tall Fescue 30 - 40
Sericea Lespedeza (Scarifield) 40 - 50
Or White Clover 8-10
Hulled Common Bermuda Grass 10
Or Weeping Love Grass 4-5
FALL RATE: (Mid) August - October
Rye grain 30
Tall Fescue 70
Sericea Lespedeza (Unhulled-Unscarified) 40 - 50
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
lbs. per acre
WINTER RATE: November - February
Rye grain 30 lbs. per acre
Unhulled Bermuda Grass 10 lbs. per acre
Unscarified Sericea Lespedeza 50 - 60 lbs. per acre
Tall Fescue 70 lbs. per acre

FERTILIZER ALL SEASONS
10-20-20
Lime
Mulch
600 lbs. per acre
4000 lbs. per acre
70 bales per acre
Mulch to be anchored by one of the following methods:
1. Crimping with mulch anchoring tool; or
2. Tack with asphalt emulsion - 400 gal. per acre.
REVEGETATION AND/OR REFORESTATION PLAN APPROVED BY:
SIGNATURE.ba�,...__.
TITLE Cps n�NtsT
AGENCY �tL ly��RU.CSiYlci,
DATE 1'Z� i,9� 90

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
F_ MAPS
1. Two copies of the county highway maps and two copies of all mine maps shall be
submitted with each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Clearly mark the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
2. Mine maps should be accurate drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged topographic
maps of the entire mine area and of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements
listed below) to clearly illustrate the following.
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the'proposed mining
activity is to be located including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
c. outline of all pits/excavations.
d. outline of stockpile areas.
e. Outline of temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
f. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be described as to
location and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed)
g. Location and name of streams and lakes.
h. Outline of settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
i. Location of planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
J . Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
k. Location of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
1. 100 year.floodplain limits.
m. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land.
n. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
G. Date prepared
7. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales must, at a minimum, meet the following guidelines:
SITE SIZE (From Page 2, Al) MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch=50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch=100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch=200 feet
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT ITEMS 2a-n BEING
ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
15

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Cep.-Zf91"#Wdr.,Le1 iI: :
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry
and travel upon our lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of
making necessary field i.nspec_tion:-or investigations as may be reasonably required in the
administration of this Act.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make
whatever entries on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions
as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has
failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
Signature*
Print Name: Robert L. May_;!j lle
Title: President - Mideast Division
Mine : Elkin Quarry l
Company: Vulcan Materials Company
"Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application for
a permit.
Return two copies of the completed application and all maps to the appropriate Land
Quality Section Regional office serving your area. (See attached list of Regional
offices).
Inquiries regarding the status of an application should be directed to the address
listed on the front page of this application form.
16

ASMITtiF RFGTGNAL OFFICE
Richard Phillips, P.E.
Interchange Bldg.
59 lk<Klfin P1.
P. 0. Box 370
Asheville, NC 28802
[phone] RCC 6305
Carrier 681-B
Avery Macon
Cherokee McDowell.
Clay Mitchell
Cleveland Polk
Graham Rutherford
Haywood Swain
Henderson Transylvania
Jackson Watauga
Yancey
*Richard Moore, Dennis Owenby
*Jan Anderson, Don Holebrooks
Lisa Shepherd, Brian North
FAYFITEVLIJ.E RF.GLCNAI., OFFICE
Joe Glass
Wachovia Bldg., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
ROG 6302 Courier 106
[phone]
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richrund
Cumberintd
Robeson
Harnett
Satcpson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
*Debra Bency, Gerald Lee
Steve Cook
* denotes Assistant Regional Fngineer
MOORF.SVEJE REGIONAL OFFICE
Jerry Cook '
919 North Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
ROG 6304 Courier 521
[phone]
Ale--xder
Iredell
R--ka
1.incoln
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Caldwell
Rowan
Catawba
St my
Gaston
union
�Vedbi Jafari-Namin Steve Allred
*bless Webb, Allen Hardy
Wr1MM'MN REGTOML OFFICE
Daniel Sams, P.E.
7225 Wrightsville Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
RCC 6303 Courier 416
[phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Fender
Dupl.in
Gerald Kraynak
WINSION-&A,L t REGIONAL OFFICE
Doug Miller, P.E.
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
WinstorrSalem, NC 27106
ROC 6306 Courier 227
[phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleeharn Randolph
Ashe Stokes
Caswell Surry
Davidson Wilkes
Davie
Forsyth
Guilford
*David Ward, Larry Lucas
Lindy Leonard, Abner Braddy
+fie Spencer.
WASHIN(70N REGIONAL OFFICE
Floyd Will -mn
1424 Carolina Ave.
P 0 Brno 1502
Washington, NC
27889
RCC 6307 Courier
174
[phone]
Beaufort
Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquitttms
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
*Pat McClain, Harry Bailey
Greg Smith
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
John Holley, P.E.
3800 Barrett Drive
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RCC 6301
[phone]
Chatham hash
Durham NorthaTton
Fdgecombe Orange
.:rklin Person
'71:anville Vance
14 a 1A fax Wake
Johnston Warren
Lee Wilson
*Tiin Holland, Wyatt Brown
*Gerry Weathers, Tony Sample
Beth Studenberg, Randy Oakley
RALEIGH HEADQUARTERS OFFICE.
Charles Gardner, Chief
512 N. Salisbury St.
P 0 Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RCC 6300
[phone]
Harlan Britt, Grief Engineer
Craig Deal, Asst. Sediment Spec.
Tom Carroll, Mining Specialist
Jim Simms, Dam Safety Engineer
Jim Letmtss, Asst. Dam Safety Fngr.
Tracy Davis, Asst. Mining Spec,
Teresa Babuin, Secretary
Carter Thoupson, Secretary

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor _ R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary July 185 1988 Director
Mr. Timothy R. Knopf
Vulcan Materials Company
PO Box 4195
Winston-Salem, NC 27115
Subject:r - - CO�vv 05371
Elkin Quarry
Burry County
Dear Mr. Knopf:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on
May 2, 1988, we are forwarding herewith the subject State - NPDES permit.
This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and
the US Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983,
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements
contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you may request a waiver
or modification pursuant to Regulation 15 NCAC 2B .0508(b) by written
request to the Director identifying the specific issues to be contended.
Unless such request is made within 30 days following receipt of this permit,
this permit shall be final and binding. Should your request be denied, you
will have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, D.3.
addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or
control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other
permits which may be required by the Division of Environmental Management or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management
Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ms.
Lula Harris, at telephone number 919/733-5083.
Since
� eii Paul Wilma
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Winston-Salem Regional Supervisor
FulhJion IbOmnrion Pays
on. °,a. -e ninrtk r,mp,�: 2�Fa_�4n ti.P�.,.n. niag13.7n1i
An Egwl Op orw"nib kfiun,atvc &pion Employer

Pormi.t No. NC0005371
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General. Stntute 1.43-215. 1,
other lawfulstandards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carol:i.na
Environmental Management Commission, and the federal. Water. PoLluti.on Control. Act, ns
amended.
Vulcan Materials Company
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located nt
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry
Surry County
to receiving wnters desi.gnnted as an unnamed tr.ibutnry to the Yadkiri River im No:
Yadkin -Pea Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent Limitations, monitorsi rig roqu.l rements, And 0t6cr
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, and III hereof.
This Permit shall become effective August I, 1988
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on
July 313 1993
Signed this day July 18, 1988
i �/
R. Paul Wilms, ll:i.rector
Division of Environmentnl Miningemrnt
By Authority of the Environmental. Mnnagemcut Commission

Permit No. NC0005371.
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Vulcan Wer.i.nis Compnny
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue operation of a closed circuit Process water treatment system
consi.st.i.ng of three 0.5 acre settling Wins connected in series located at
the Elkin Quarry in 5urry County (See Part I.I.I. of this Permit), and
2. Discharge pit dewatering into an unnamed tributary to the Yadkin River
which is classified Class "C" waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee R:i.ver. Basin.

a
N1�PC%M1T
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor November 14, 1989 R. Paul Wilms
William W, Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. Robert M. Poplin, Environmental Engineer
Vulcan Materials Company
Post Office Box 4195
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27115-4195
Dear Mr. Poplin:
Subject: Air Permit No. 2661116
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin, North Carolina
Sorry County
In accordance with your completed application received
August 29, 1989, we are forwarding herewith Permit No. 2661116 to Vulcan
Materials Company, Elkin, North Carolina for the construction and
operation of air emission sources or air cleaning devices and
appurtenances.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit
are unacceptable to .you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory
hearing within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit,
identifying the specific issues to be contended. This request must be
in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27604. Unless such demand is made, this permit shall be final
and binding.
This permit shall be effective from November 14, 1989, until
July 1, 1993, is nontransferable to future owners and operators, and
shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therei
Sin rely,,✓ '
R. Paul Wilms
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Larry Coble
Mr. Mike Aldridge
Ito. Ilmc 27687, ILIcig6, Noah Can,ina ]7611-7697 IMcphone 919733-1115

vullon
Materials Company
July 30, 1990
Mr. Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
P: 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27687.
Re: Permit No. NCOOO5371
Elkin Quarry
Surry County
Dear Mr. Tedder:
An internal review of the
above referenced permit and treatment
facilities indicates modification
of said permit is necessary.
For your review, please
find enclosed an application, flow charts
and supplemental information.
Should you have questions or require
additional input, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
J� c,
Mike Poplin
Environmental Engineer
/lnh
Enclosures: Check No. 134206 for $200.00.
MIDEAST DIVISION / P,O, BOX 4239 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTh CAROLINA 27115-4239 • TELEPHONE [phone]

NARRATIVE
WATER DISCHARGE'SYSTEM
ELKIN QUARRY
Rainfall run-off and groundwater infiltrate are pumped from the pit
(settling) sump into a series of settling ponds. These ponds also
receive surface run-off as well as process water from the wash plant
where fine particles are washed to produce clean stone. A polymer is
usually added to improve sedimentation.
Normally, the system is non -discharge. However, during wet seasonal
periods:or heavy rainfall, a discharge will occur from the designated
Outfall 001.

EIe�N �unARY
NP➢ES PEAM�T
NC o0o S31 �
�ao.c�a RweAt �2 V1
3
9cAF11
N�u P,...F
Fah
�Q E
rwnN
s T�
' F�oW, RATc= (nSo GSM
*p
Som
PST
RnP

l
uwy
r
G
„
SHALL
'
POND SETTLING)
SETTLING
-
POND 2
POND 1
Pump
SUMP
SETTLING. POND
d
-
- PLANT RUN-^ca
.
I,
SCAEW
PROCESS
AREA
plpa
WASH
�L roll 00I
-
TOrr_R
-
now RATE 620 GPM
Pem:+N< NC 000S371
-
5."y C,_.ly
-
-
V le."smile a,ls CC_p.„y

VULEIIA MATERIALS COMPANr

FUie;:�;r�er ee,) ,1, f�: no: ?='s=% alley, williams, carmen, 6 king
Sueje<e Doc=.�' 4!i consulting engineers
�J j( .Q/� v Rep. rYI�L 207 south mein street p. a. box 124a
Oate: Ynnnepolis, north caroline 2SO82 [phone]
�ct�111 02H,5I A10
�zat••Ae Aze; l 'Fcz
CXs
SEDIMENT PIT DESIGN'
70B NAME:.VMC-ELK'INIDUARRY
RATIONAL METHOD "
-1 -
SUMMARY OF DATA
DA7 DENUDEI
D) DRAINAGE
C) C—FAGTOF
1) 'INTENSI,T
N) ;NUMBER.,LI
E) TRAPI EFF
Vo) SETITLH,
0) BASIN OL
REOUIREO SURFACE_
BASIN DIM.._. -150_
3000 '�
I
tj
0� O
BASIN NUMBER:
1
AREA ,(ACRES) =
1.29
t
AREA (ACRES)
1.95
0-65
,(INCHES/HOUR) =
6.50
CELLS. I-
2.0
CIENCY_,W =
70
.00
VELOCITY (FT/SEC) =
0.0647
FLOW '-I(CFS) =
8.24
)
REOUIREDIVOLUME -"2322 c
- SED. PIT IDIM r —3 ft DEI
2400-�cfi> ?3'
I 'I
.._ CALCULATED WEIIR,jLENGTH
I
is
I ;
I 9
h..928 Sf
z_160 ft LONG = 3000 sf;
'14 .928 SF THEREFORE OK
I
P—z -25 ft WIDE OEx 32;fttLONG: 2400 cf-
'2-..IcfTHEREFORE OK
.�119375 It THEREFORE USE 5 ft-_ I _ _ „ r
r—
{-
'_-i.
i

Proleci:No, alley, williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers El I
Subject
Zan apoli main street p. o. 38 1245
Odle: Rep. kannapplia; nortM1 ca^allna 26e62 (704) 9]e•1515
t17ENODED Av2E0.� c 0� L ShLF-' � 1 . _
LA,NC use . _.!'_C :. -r.. P.PrP
o 47,7,5 j
Wo
N. ..;_Ave GTr 1.= i3 �', zo ! — .O< 37
SEDIMENT; PI-T"DESIGN-
i . +-
7D8 NAME VMC ELKIN,iQUARRY BASIN NUMBER: 2
I R_ATIONAN METHODI ,
. ""'.SUMMARYi"OF-DRTIR_
L-I-
(. DA>IDENUDED,ARER (IACRES) = 0.65:
I D) DRAINAGE AREA (.ACRES) = 3 20!
r
C> C FADTDR , =1
__I> INTENSITY i(INCHES/HOUR) = i6 50r --
E> BASBN�R-OUTFLOWLI $C,
E) TRAP IEFFICI ENCY ( - - ,-- 70 00 - ,
-Vo)�SETTL ING VELOC ICY-(FT/SEC) 10 0047� -I - REQUI_.
RED SURF A9CE I RE�RT274 1 2
117
-BASIN'D1z 60 ft sf LNGI�-7I 3000 s-
f I� -r -I- I..T . s- 2704217 sf THEREFORE OK _-.-- r
_
! REQUIRED
VOL�UMtE__I 1170i—cf
li SED 1PI7 OH ! �3 jft�I DEEPI xC 18 ft WIDE rx 25 ft LDNG 1350 cf I
CALCULATED- LENGT = 3 848THft iT cf I-
EREFK E' 5 't IL -I
r
-- -,
I
r ;

n.cxr% No, 15. Z5
alley, williams, carmen, & king
/,gzi i5%c.N
=14-6c
consulting engineers
Rep. Mi1563
207 south main Street P. o. box t249
4annepolis, nodh cerollno 20082 (]04)0]B-I315
P,ciirnr iJ ,llc 3!
IC'AS_aI
13
.. _-
'riEw(7t✓ F•laEl.;-�_I
6',Gi4 AGv
.... '..
! i
0
SEDIMENT PIT -DESIGN -
_I
joe rvnl let JIMC ELKIN QUARRY
BASIN NUMBER:; 3
'RATIONAL METHODI "
..... .-
SUMMARYt-OF -DATA-
- -
' DR> DENUDED
i
j_. REA CR
AREA (AES)'0
:69 '
-
D) DRAINAGE AREA (ACRES)
=j �.1.26
C) C FACTOR- j f
_�
0.61
- I)'INTENSIiY-(-INCHESt HOUR) -
_"'
6.50
N) NUMBER-6F--CELLS--L,
_ 2..0 - --
E) TRAP EFFICIENCY
( %)
_' 70.00
Vo) SETTLING VEIOCITIY
(FT/SEC)
_' 0.0047
__.
D) aacIN nl_iTFlnlu
frcS)
.
-�" 5,0�...
- -�=F-
-.l_. .
"t" REOU IRED SURFACE41AREA7187U7589
sf
1
BASIN DIM `40-f-tL, WIDE
xI--48
ft LONG
=r-1920 sf -1-T- -
.._
11920 _sf_)
1670;.569
sf
THEREFORE_DK -) ..i ..
I
i
REQUIRED
VOLUME
!
—L _ -i_-•
j
112,42,
SED- PIT DIM._ _3 �ft1-DEEPI
1
si 20 ft
.WIDE .z `25 ft LONG = '1500.cf-
"--'`
----i 1500 "cf_)T1242
_cf THEREFORE'OK'"-
I
TED WEIR
..._ CALCULATED
i
LENGTH 2 6 6175
- f
�t�HEREFORE
I (
USE 15 ft -,
( i
,,, . .,
_
... �.
�_.I.
T _
,...-..��
_..
1
III j .���
- { ^T T �.- � _.—._ -•_
I

prblecl; _iron, -� n.a! n,.�..r.:/ No: __ alleq, Williams, carmen, &king
Subject. 5=—%Itr, 5,i1-5��h �7t<r� consulting engineers
307 South 'mam street p. o, boF 1248
Date: Rep. WDR kannepalic, north carplina 28002 (]00)988.1518
1
.;D6NvDEY RREA- 10 7D_Acp.65 _i .1.,
i i I 1
_.i 7 f._.
E
I
SEDIMENT. PIT DESIGN i
70B,NAME-VMC-ELKIN�OURRRY -BAS I N NUMBER:, 4
RATIONAL+, METHODi'- -I..-I-
SUMMARY DF DATA
i . C`
{ D) DRAINAGE AREA (,ACRES) _ 1.05
C) _C_FAOTOR._;- __{ ,.. = 0.65
1) INTENSITY (INCHES/HOUR) = 6.50
M NUMBER OF CELLS
E) TRAP iEFFf C;IENCY (%); 70.00
Vo)iSETTtLING-,VELOCtT1Y-('FT/SEC ) 0:0047
0) BASIN, OUTFLOW ,(CFS) _ 4.44
_i REQUIRED SURFACE;AREA I sf !
1
BRSIN ❑IMI 35j ftT WIDE xl 45 ft LONGL-= 1575 sf _
1575 sf > laSG 807 sf THEREFORE OK
--� -REQUIRED VOLUME ;-1260 cf
r
1
f F SE). PIT. OlM k. Cf - -.
.3_ft DEEP_x v0 ft WIDE x 25ft LONG1500
i15�00�� cf ) 1260 cf THEREFORE OK _ -
CALCULATED WEIR LENGTH 2 218125 :ftI THEREFORE USE 5 ft'' J F f
V
-- -
_
y '
I_

Protect =erw 0.,ARn_•/ No: `'G =- alley, williams, [ormen, & king
Subject:71i:�� Ckc�. of kannapolis, int.
F N 6 IN E E R S t, RC N IT E C TS
Derr: 9-1�-�2l7 Rep a71i N7""k.... urt.. R... h.. 124
.eeli•, •anA umliw 2808E 704/9Y-0515
Lll{l ,
. VI1.61. IJL -L, \_LELIpN N¢N .. _... _ -_
1
I i
�A¢sq 5,5`;,FGI'2ej 76�,.'
KI4 `pA C7.E]4)(5,6 Z),I45 C{s I
AswmE A neynd 3erwea�I o.s- i•a2 .. �d= o.iz� ;
VMC-ELKIN QUARRY.
CHANNEL TYPE:
Is11 d50 RIPRAP TRAPEZOIDAL
SUMMARY OF DATA
N-) MANNING'; S-ROUGHNESS"COEF. _'.- 0.1270 -�--• — .- - -
Z) AVERAGE�SIDE SLOPE. 2.0:1 +
W) WIDTH OF CHANNEL BOTTOM = 5.00 FT:
S) CHANNELISLOPE
I
D) NORMAL _DEPTH OF. -FLOW =! 0.99 FT
WP) WETTED j PERIMETERI 9.25 FT-
'A-)-CROSSECTIONAli AREA- 6'55 FT'k, i--�--
R), HYDRAULIC RADIUS.. -.I. O Zl FT-2-)
Q) DESIGN FLOW (!QUANTITY) _`. 2 �. .._
V) AVERAGEIVELOCITY J - 3 27 FFPF' � "
T) .SHEAR STRESS _�. j. 7711...LBS/FT2- '-
VR) V x R <GRASS ONLY) 2 32 FT2/SEC___
�leae sneers 71 y!b a` '75o Ibr �_ �Crnnr :AA
D�siei✓ _.�s RDEAuArc'. _� I t r _-_t , _-
i ! i II'.... _ f
+ - ' 1

Project'.
No 6h5z3=
alley, Y81)ltamf, carmen, &king
Subject:
DI"�W
(-AIL_
consulting engineers.
Date:
n- I-`'' OO
ReD. /ADR
207 south main street P. e. her 1248
Meenepelie, north "reline 28082 (7041838-1515
- I DITLN NO - ZL_� TcY./r1PNERT.
C EAo ASZ1 ACRES t. i.. _ - Td 19 M/a
;a 6��Ne
-4 _
jQw ._C Tro'A y..0.ln5 iFa)il 7•.Z) = Z9.09 CiS
I
1 UMl -EI KIN O(JARRY I,
CHANNEL TYPE: , - -
F r156 RIP'�R(P TRAPE77:GOA
SUMMARY OF DATA
'NI) -MANNING 5 ROUGHNER�"-CIIE = 0 O540
f I ' Z) -A1Vk RAGE -S I DE SLOPE l - 0 1` -
Wj) -kJ Tr) fH DF ACHFNNEt an F I WM 00 1FL. 1
y._ ) CHANNEL SLOPE.:3 00 -
1 Ilk) NORMAL 'DI'PTH OF FLOW = 1 01 F1. -
WP)IWETTED PERIMETER _ S d) FT'
I7 IAD-CROS>ECTIONAL AREA _ 7 05 FT
R}--HYIIRAUUPC-RANIU'
1O4)-UES11 N,FLI:IW ( OUANT-i-hYr) t_
-a--- --i V )._AVERAGE VCLOCIT'i _._ 9© S . . .
--- T t) SHEAR STRESS ' _ _ 1 E3O t ©! /FT
I VR rkj IX 'R. <GRA ONLY), f 1 = ; /6 1FT'2/1 SEC t
It
11 I
r r7 t
I r -
1 � I
I
'UMWVHIG
1
T
T T...r.__ �.
I
i

P'Oleci: =izl,.i rdoo'✓
NO: '7:z
alley, Williams, carmen, & king
^_f,l
Subject;
consulting engineers
Date: 4- )3 Q0
Reo-
Mo3
207 4eutb neon street P. o. ea. 1248
k mmuntolia, north caroling 28082 [phone]
Of"
i D.170a
/40 1.3L__(TEmPOIa
?'f
d
I
4l
A6�_/95sa�1
r.r
C or 5
_j 6,5
5 1N/ua
L
—
�Qlc .0 r_
0,65(6p.0
1, 95� _
ZS
06'.
_S. .r_
Pi
I.
,_;F
CHl
'— N )
Z)
N)
4 ., I5)
.�...-:. : WP
VR)]l
f
>S ' ❑IOAL ! 1 LINED TRAP [EZ ....._-�_.'.
....
2Y OF DATAi
- I
iNE55 COEF.-"=
-0:0600--
=OPE _
2.0'1 -
-
-
=L BOTTOM =
3.00 FT.-
=
7.00 %
'; FLOW I =
0.55 FTI
IER - _
5 A5 FT ;_- I. ...
_.I ......
REP -
j =
2.24"FTP
JS
JANTITY ){
=
0 41-FT -+
8
r
IY
=
13 6 LOS._.r.
...I
2.39 LBS/FT2
INLY) -
=
1 51-FT2/SEC dd
CEIANJ�%_
3
6911;s Q D-'
_�
17—
i
Ed Tem9o'eaRy WNrNv � scl5ol_ 1 I
1T-
.irY 7,-1p2.jJ 6)1 4.Iz lP5l > 13rbg.CyS�.i i _,r _

Proiea: _.=..lug GucPa,/ No: __�;_ alley, williams, carmen, & king
Subject: � ��w. consulting engineers
Dale: q-144D Re Mb8 so7 sown rats street o, o. ho, 1248
c hennanous, north mororea 26082 vo4i eat.1nse
r..---
IDi;ireu hlc
A.4 ,(ITemrozraP/.171/e25lorl,-D!4�.
it
fl eCA. 3 z0 4 c , -_--- T� 5.. 0_ m N
1.
1.. .._�.
.. - 1
1C=0.65 rro G.ISiN�NK �:_
-a-. 1
_
qt �
t
IOip. GToA r=
•
r
I - : VMC IELKIN QUARRY, ( !
j - `m
t .__r
CHANNE' TYPE j9' d50 RIPRRP ;TRAPEZOIDAL I
- 4}
OF DATA.
_SUMMARY
I- N) MANNING S ROUGHNESS COEF 0.0680 -
M1=
( Z) AVERAGE SI OEISLOPE- _ 2.0.1
--,-
-� - W) WIDTH OFL ANNEC BOTTOM- �. =. 5:00 FT.
I i-
- --- - - -8-)_CHANNEL--SLOPE-- .- -- -=.- 10.00 % - -
_ _ 0) NORMAL DEPTH yOF'FLOW _. 0.55 FY.
I -�-
WP)jWETTED PERIMETER = 7.44 FT.
I 'A) OROSSECTIONAU AREA = 3.33IFT.
_ T) DES I GNL IC RADIUS = 0 45:FT.
-
dV) AVEIGN FLOW-(jQUANTITY)-Cfs� O) DES�gl
--- h — RAGE VELOCIT-Y - -�-= 4 06�F --
_ _ ! AR 'STRESS 3 41 LDS/FT2
1 IVR) V_z R (GRASS ONLY) { =I 1 82iFT12/SEC 7771
rs _ t 4
TREESlEazs 2�> je RTse._
`AEs+S is AaleouarE y I i
7 4-
1�

P.)ieci: rL'C,J (:ULzzd ND: 'sz; alley, williams, carmen, & king
Subject TITLH consulting engineers
Date: C- 13 OJ Rep. -NJ D3 287 South malt street p. aen3IsnaB.osiskennepls+ north confine 28082 (7 8-mid
) l71"�h Na �' _(T7=mzoean! Tilye.�vronl A:�ZCN)' , ! .-
_ AeeA zt� v --
1 ,
.. 11 .F._. �._ I I I j.
tCs t.Ao,
-
Q C TI A -.to I. 0 :
t :
� I
- .. _...1_ 4 1 1..
VMC,ELKIN OUARRYF.: - 1
CHANNEL TYPE GRASS LINEDTRAPEZOIDAL
t iSUMMARY OF OAT
{.._
N) MANNING S-ROUGHNESS COEF I = 0.0500-
j �Z) AVERAGE SIOE_t'SLOPE I 2.0:1 '.
_ W)_WIOTH IOFICHANNEL BOTTOM -.I_= 3.00 FT".
S) CHANNEL SLOPE = 3.00 %'
NORMACI-DEPTH-jQF' FLOW = 0.53 FT,.
WP).�WETTEO PERIMETER = 5.39 FT.
:A)-CROSSECT-IONAL-AREA + = 2.10. FT.
IR) HYDRAULIC RAOIUS ' - 0 40 FTI
Q) DESIGN FLOW (LOUR
.��V f RVERAGE VELOCITY
I T) -SHEAR (STRESS 1-1 - _ PI 0 LBS/FT2-
VR)Vz --R (GRASS -ONLY) 0 99'FT�2/SEC --
4-
_.. AI Y,Ee_HbE� �(t;coul`/� IN CHNNNEL r z.4G �� L_4.0 �STimAi'i
A65r6N r31__/�DEBugTc-� t
I +
.� mERItaN �.6iceeN Temr_azaa/ LinU�lo 5(sU. N ' - -
' I _
_PERMIS51At.E ttccfr/� 2144 .CM j I
-
I�-
I "

Pi,je=i ='tjN QUPPl No: 'oszs alley, williams, carmen, 6 !ring
Subject' 40IZ', PA-C consulting engineers
p sm sown moon street P. o. box 1240
Date: o'i3-9D Rep. Yannapotic, north cernlinn 28082 [phone]
- i ' Di. r,H No ;y_G_ _. i,Tem7akA2� _ ��i YEeS/o��D!?��. •
, C
o A' D bs 6,9X1,05) 4 4,41 c s
f • I I v F
V _
VMC--;ELKIN-OI ARRY- - - - -
_I
CHANNEL TYPE (GRASS LINED TRAPEZOIORLj
_.
Y�. : iSUMMARY OF DATA - i-
N)-MANNING'S-ROUGHNESS-COEF. = 0.0550
:. Z).RVE rN)WIORAGE_SIDE_jSLOPE
TH_OF-LCHANNE_L. BOTTOM 3 00'FTr
S) CHANNEL SLOPE = 2 00 r% 1
t I �D) NORMRL ODEPTH OFI-FLOW - 0 V FT;
WP)"JWE7TED PERIMETER 15757 FTC
- '- rA) CROSSECTIONALi-AREA -2 38 FTI r I-
t�R) HYDRAULIC RADIUS : = 0.43 F_TI 4. ..a
_ OJ OESLGN FLOW (OUANTI7Y) r = S J I _
j TV) AVERAGE VELOCITY S
VR) V x R (GRASS ONLY) t =4 0 80 FT _/SEC
1 l _—L
;_- AVEwa�E V our W CNANJE� �/ g'7i.t<ps1G,_4005
)
�!DES,teM1 15.�ADERu! I`.
I � I ,
,_ VE�o�r_n' INW'AWNSL is L 20 s �lol em? Lr,vr�e .�eowe-ED 1 _i
.. ,.. . _. .�.... _�. t... .. 1. -
f

Pl6jeci:
YHi.- E_c,l Qaneey No: ___
alley, Williams, carmen, &king
consulting engineers
Date:
LLL
4.14-4 r, -Rep. MD3
-
2m south main st.eet p. a. tax 1240
kannapolls, earth canapes 28082 0001 838.1515
r
I rJfTG!I. rlu �' ��ERffIRN�-N.`_'iJ JI(P Rit. i la flt�i�,
fj�1 SEGT7,Dh( �(NOKTFi, SI1�E�
-{�ET'^�EEN
G r?K 206a
'
c Foz car s�orc�o j_ I.
;5Wrt:.o7B.._
�FNb U58 iG FRCP_.
-_C.xA ,.
-
I
'I _1 j
I
62F.9EL ;2D � _«C•�` I.�1. 6.25 � �
0.2C
CV%sLo�C ,
1
0.648
oat
0-Z49 4
I
i
c
1
}
t
VMC=FCRIN OUARR7
CHANNFII -T_YPF
21
I _}.
_
R
!L...
V
V
I_
[ SUMMARY OF ,DATA. i d MANNING S ROUGHNESS COLT. C: 7
-)--AVERAGE-- SIDE-SL'OPE ?;p I
W;)-W-I.DTHWF CHANNEL'- BOTTOM'f m100
Sj) CHANNE'L_SLOPE_`__' 7 n80
Oi) NORMALI DEFT-H_-, OF_FLOW_ i I 0..58
WP)IWETITED PERIMETER T ,_2.,Of
Al) CROS�SECTII ONAI (AREA 0.67I
�) HYDRAUL'IC RAC IIUS' I 0 26'
OI) htVLRAN-FLOW (IUTY;_ TY )I 11
�) AVERAGE.. VELOC.I1 2 q21
T I1) SHEAR STRESS _ I, 3
R )�44 x RI_( GRA5S ONLY) - 0-. 631
I I1
D�sibAl Is
I
�..4-
1 _
S
..
.�
SI/FT2;
r.--_._ ..{.__,.

pajed: -ymf- k! n1)A Na: la, alley, williams, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
Subject: 77r o P� C'
Date i-IQ QD Rep_ M7Fd 207 south wtn M1treeet zaoez P. 0. box 1 248
kannapelta. no 1100I 93 B-1515
:DITCH Nob 110..- FC&AA1v17 Dt Tr�1i B�TW64!t M-Fini> P1 GJT-SEcr+cN (SR,STi 61C4) '
RecP F O, r . T�
'C_FoR- G5EA,ue [?oo-a>:.A,B. To--= G_5_tN/lam _
G FDR CUT 5L'O?E J.;B%.
1! CNb, Use C AILE
' i
o.65:741
AYEC 0.0 3L-f_L 06c
1
IA) — o. SA61 cs$'
t
CMK
C—ELKIN OUARRY{ .
CHANNEL 'TYPE
RASS LPNEO VEE CHANNEL r
SUMMARY OF DAT.'_..
;_I
1 N) MANNING SIROUGHNESS COCF-r 0 0500 r
Z) AVERAGE SIDC SLOPE - _ j )� -0= 1 f
` W) WIDdTH�"OF—CHANNEL—BOTTOM { 0.00 FT -
S) CHANNEL4SLOPE�—I )- —1 T 7.B0 %
-- - --©-)—NORMAL—DTFII EPTH .OF'.F LOW— 0-34 F_T
R){HYbS
DRRULIC RAO�US __` I O.I2 FTI
i 0) HYDRAULIC R (OUANT ITY) 0.2I I I
' UJP) WEr TEDI PERIMETER {_ 1 1 5
- t 5 FT ..
r 1— S .. _ . ±._ ..
> V )i AVERAGE, VELOChI-Tly
VR V ix. R(GRASS-ONLY)- { _0.36 FT2/FTz�.
�) �— I SEC
_ 1 1 ...-r... .... . .
T—)rSHEAR�STR '
yI
--— i ��5E-1-uaa'TIa{imFJL+rAN�G,PF,�FaIJTEMI�7RpRY_ GNr Nb1 ISo
I
h7AX �P�emrzs_,3� VEcourj _s rys —tilt
:• TjE3/6N +5 ADE'Q.vATE. -�

R.oiecc YMr-sc'cu! v4zzy No: as=5 alley, Williams, carmen, &king
Subject: 72�' rc�, consulting engineers
Date: ZS-40` R¢D. MD3 ROT aeutM1 main street p, u. bon 1248
_q' kannepplis, nar1M1 carollna xe063 pOq 838.1518 EL
_-... r -
t DrrCN Na 111. -(Fsp_m,; DNA/ , 'D[7ZA
!. .Lic- _;0I I,=.. (i (co im. �.J[i 99) _J.(o ;.z GS Cfs
n
VMC-ELKIN QUARRYT
,.. CHANNEL C...TYPE.i.-_�__�
1.5_
' -d50-RIPRAP-'i CHANNEL'
HA
SUMMARY OF DATA '
I N)1MANNING SiROUGHNESSI-COEF.-0.1040-.
'2-) AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE I - 2.0 P} -
'W')-�WI'DTH* OF -CHANNEL -BOTTOM - 3.00,-FTi � -- -
S.) CHANNEL. SLOPES—.�J_ _
Eo�NORMAL _DEPTH -OF1FLOW = 0.48 FT.
A)� CR_SS�ECTIONAtii AREA, i : 1.89 FT
P) WETTED PERIMETER 5.14 FT
TQ)�HYD' ULIC,RADIUS j "" 0..37 FT �- - - -
!'- R) DESIGN -FLOW}'( -ANTITY) ^-- 0 ers --
- V) AVERAGE VELOCQUYr e iT
- L T) S E[AR STRESS j p,. �F 5 98 LHS/FTS
ONLY) �_ i 1. L2 Y1L/SN.0
it
L� v srn� ss s fly/6
~
R) V x R <GRASS
59
A �Ff L !n 30 I b� � �(mA/ sNenw STieEss �a .l5 ciso)
/S_. } ...
1
r

prajec;'; VP4C - cJ zW Cunr¢'/ No: On5 alley, willinms, carmen, & king
consulting engineers
-Subject, �% C' L '
Oale' G- 5-90 Rep. M�3 207 south main street P. o. box 1246
kanna0olis, nodh "folino 20082 4704) 938-1515
i
f D17cN lJu 11Z
._ .. Azar±_ 2.25
Gr O-ro5 :I o 6,S„ Al
I
i
i
YMC ELKIN I' ---j
CHANNEL TYPE:"4 d50P, T2aPEzo+DR;-
vMC
- SUMMARY OF DATA - i
a
=..�10'.00 8
6.57 FT.
5..57 FT 4,
1 2.38 FT ; P 5 -
01:43 FT -�
0 C
i 3.99�N' +. _...
3, 8 LBS/PT2�
I 111_71 FT2/SEC
I
'

pbiecl:
Subject:
Date:
W&-
4�PE
A - 'Q!J
a.'urd
DePIJ
No szs
p
FeO. MOI >
alley, williams, carmen, & king
Consulting engineers
20T south pail" street P. o. boa 1248
kann tpolis, north Caroline 2BOB2 (706)9]e.1515
1 I-
r
b0�o ^ 0 9 7 AckE3..
.25Z.cI1n5.
�Fzcm,.TrD�u 6,3ZIA wscE 60. CISP
!Dvi7,sT 77ctioN rod 141
US�cek
I _...--t-' TI
p I
j" E (� l_ ?2P J2', irlCz. W/ tV c 'u67 FIZFEe S Z4d
� I
i � I
1 ,
I I�
t. II j
i}
I-
f<
I
i,
't I
I
7.. , i 1
i
_..� F L._ ..--i I—,
_.. .{
( 1 1 !I{II
1 I— I _ � 1 r _

I alley, williums,, Car�en,!tn
!
DF516tconsulting engineers
sublect: A2071001 'n street V. 0. box 1248
Date: 9-27-42 Rep. m kSprlJIMdh =arnnnaza082 (704)938-
SIS
AREA
Feu" 56)
- - - - - - -
NORMAL DEPTH PIPES
-
-------------- 7­:'
FLOW,RATE,CFS !9.5
PIPE DIAINCHES j :24
-MANNING'S .023-
PIPE_SI1OPE,,FT;/FT, :.2
NHRMAL-0EPTH OF FLOW 0.55
VELOCITY AT NORMAL DEPTH':
_7
--t--INLET -COINITROLL ---004IUGAflED-MiETAL-PIPE- @-HEADWALL i r-------
T
-1 --- ---
FLOW RATEr-CFS1 9-57-
... . . .... ... 4:
PIPE DIA.r IN SI: 24-1 -
t 1 14 dll A P ienp
:S7DVc*
TER DEPTH F;T.j_:_F_I_.62
lip"
cl �

?re iect reLKIIJ �. m22�( s 5"M Dare o1 -149C
Location SURdLY Checked Dace
Circle one: Presen Developed GEXIStuG DLVT G' SrmolcPl l.E%RcT. "13"
L. Runoff curve number (CN)
Soil name
Cover description
I/
Area
Product
and
CN —
of
hydrologic
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrol'oglc
__//
(yacres
CN x'area
r�
N
'
group
condition;
`�
`°
❑mi2
percent impervious;
m
unconnected/connected inpervious
(appendix A)
area ratio)
m
F
W
i3
�ooDS- LIG�CIfbu
55
g
boos N� s ��2LL6i
9.3
SSS,o
G
�DOOS - LIGHT i�2LS4A
-73
6.4
.Gt3,2
G
L�0003- HEAO_� Rlw.s-U
_70
5.9
413.0
Ti 1A=-D 2oA7D
0.3O
29.4
Use only one CN source per line. Totals
-JO
1949.10
CN (weighted) total product 194�.1 �,97 use CN SOS
total area 30 ,
2. Runoff
Frequency .............................. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff, Q .............................. in
(Use P and CN with table 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Storm 01
Storm 42
Storm C3
ivyrG
'�CJVY
s.o
Co,2
D 2 (21U-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 198M

Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt)
Project By ZrOl Dace -14-)O
location necked Date .
Circle one: Present Developed
Circle one: 0 it through subarea
NOTES: Space for as many as two aegmeres per flow type can M used for each
worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments.
Sheet flew (Appllcable.co Tc only) Segment ID
1. Surface description (table 3-1) ............ .,
2. Henning's roughness coeff., n (table 3-1) .. ©. G
3. Flow length, L (total L C 300 fc) .......... it 0D
4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 ..... 4............ in
5. Land slope, s .............................. ft/ft $12
0.8
6. Tt . 0.00075(nL0)4 Compute Tt ...... hr O•15& 0 5 G
P2 a
Shallow concentrated flew _ Segment 1D
7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..... uUa
S. Flow length, L ... 0......................... ft (45c)
9. watercourse slope, s ......... 0............. ft/ft e12
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ........... ft/s
11. Tt 3600 VV Compute Tt ...... hr • 03 •03
Channel flow Segment ID
12. Cross sectional flow area, a fc2
13. Wetted perimeter, pw ....................... ft
14. Hydraulic radius, r - a Compute r ....... ft
P
w
15. Channel slope, a ........... :............... ft/ft
16. Morning's roughness coeff., n ..............
1.49 r2/3 s 1/2
19. V - Compute V ....... ft/e
n
18. Flew length, L ...... 0...................... ft
19. Tt 1600 V Compute Tt hr 0.0
20. Watershed or subarea T. or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19) ....... hr 10591
g
(210-VI-TR-ai, Second Ed., June 1986) +-3

.orrcsneet : trapmcai reap ulscnarge meln(m
Project
Location
Circle one: Present Developed
I. Data
3v 5M
Date
Checked
Date
Drainage area .......... Am - . 041 mil (acres/640)
Runoff curve number .... CN - (D (From worksheet 2)
Time of concentration .. To - hr (From worksheet 3)
Rainfall dls tribution' type (1, IA, II, III)
Pond and swamp areas spread
throughout watershed ...... percent of Am (_ acres or ail covered)
2.
Frequency ...............................
yr
3.
Rainfall, P
(24-hour) ...................
in
Storm #1
Storm 02
Storm 13
10
SO
5•o
G.2
4.
Initial abstraction, I .................
in
(Use CN with table 4-1.)
5.
Compute Ia/P ............................
10. ZI54
0. 1-137
6.
Unit peak discharge, q
csm/in
430 44-5
.................
(Use Tc and Ia/P with exhibit 4 —)
7.
Runoff. Q ...............................
in
(From worksheet 2).
8.
Pond and swamp adjustment factor, F ...
O-�Lo •9
(Use percent pond and swamp area P
with table 4-2. Factor is 1.0 for
zero percent pond and swamp area.)
9.
Peak discharge,
3Z• Q 50.2 1
qP ......................
cfs
(where qp . qu-1mQFP)
D-1
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)

a,rleoF: Diu fQI ,orsr•.' P No: ':GS?S alley, Williams, carmen, &king
Sublem; HVD GAu�.G anusesm,� oA kaS&ARCHiIT inc
ENGINE fR56 ARCHITECTS
Dale: 9-1d-�i0 Re. .T h'1 mr.... f ..., E.. lue
:.':Exl sTi ,.I'(a ii E1 C,,.HT o�F �aO'1 = Ib1�8 -.'83•I(o 16• Ca 4'1 � 15.OI
;PotiPuuy Artery. C,us�Reo•3.c� .Ac,;zEs : ._
Vow Po niO = .,A(i8.1�4�(•3(oi = 2,�G'B A.crzs ,ter �. �OEg Noi. un�
TO SE 97zli,TFD
�. url0-c2 IISTi.E 15
17E516h1 EMe1z4EzuGV-5Plu,unV FOIL aso '.Sro,unn �RcmuE,T.l c.�r
. 1
�'zp oiJ=%iiCl00 LQ W IDS a rrH Z%OIZ�.%2EniER APP¢074cN cwbN u6
t.SL:OPE OF..SSit��-WAY = ZO',� 12E@u12E5„R.,I P-2AY DESIGt�I
Zee c.l i-i Is tc :.
4;5,4�7 +eT
ULU l ' 1. bI PJ N.IJCL
;. PseiH. FLpJ O.S <p c10 r1=.O10�
I
. VULCAN .MATERIALS COMPANY -
CHANNEL TYPE: ! i
15" D56 RIPRAP TRAPEZOIDAL-
.. �_ .�
1 SUMMARY OF DATA
f
t ) MANNING-S ROUGHNESS COEF;. - .0:1040 ---- - - - ---tt
i ( 'Z) AVERAGE SIDE SLOPE I2:0:1
_ W). WIDTH OF CHANNEL BOTTOM-� 25 00I'FT.
!. SLOPE.-- 20.00 8 - - ---
I D)'NORMAL DEPTH OF FLOW = 0:50LFT ,__,. _
-- "''WP)--WETTED PERIMETER ___- - - --27.22. FT. --
A) CROSSECTIONAL AREA = 12.89 FT. -
R) HYDRAULIC RADIUS = 0.47 FT.
Q) DESIGN FLOW .(QUANTITY) = 5➢T20-GF5
V) AVERAGE VELOCITY = �.8 iIps
T) SHEAR STRESS = 6'. �9 LBS/FT2
VR)V x R (GRASS ONLY) = 1.84 FT2/SEC

arr.;e�i:.-uuu .c?1 1I rLy No: 9os,_3 alley, williams, carmen, & king
Sub lecl: HVT 27)a e. cn S a i.�n'- - of kannopolis, ine.
_ M 6 I ME E R S 6 R R C M ITF CTS
Dale: -r'/O Rep. 2m,..n m.:. n..., ... s.. 124
I .... v 11....,F..�.R.. team ioaivna.ISIS
Pe1zm (PIS tyer SPE»R, ✓CRESS Icf = G,30 > (,J9 D,r.
3.89 _ O1_, D 5 OKL
U FF— IS Ic150_ CH%/JWEL 25' L IDE
w/ z:1 SIDc sLoPES e zo% Gera=
Et,Ev....luv, ?1z)m LY ouii-Y bz'¢oPi=..1.0.0,00
St.aV. ErvlEzc,rF_>vcx S?IUUww4 = . 101.50
HEIC, HT rr—,L� 10 F,.m S9. = 07s,
v ELcWmrF_rL = �101S+O-ZS = lo2.ZS
FRSS$ODQbI _= I.ZSI -
Ll.-Ev. C2ESr of P%m = I O-Z + LZS = 103. 5b
PIz 1 mnnv SPI Ll.4t lam`( I'LI' �0 P
1uLF,T GO DrnDu FwTvc—uuc-
H t72,;px = ID?,25 -1Do. DD = 2,25�
FLOW RATR' CPS : 5.5 = 60
PIPE DI A.;.- INCHES- : 12 -
!
,
_ I HEADWATER DEPTH,_PT. 2.25
-. _I. j HW/D-.: 21:i25:
' I (I) PORIINLET CONTROL (0) FORl OUTLET (iCONTROL; (IM)I FOR MENU '
COmpvn'E 1I104m,a,� PrvFP-'off V61. 01? F020 5.5r1=S

Rr L9OE r,=1.v�.� 0•�.alz: NO: 90s25 alley, willioms, carmen, & king
SuCjeCI; rM?•GI.JUC Casa "-->7A�� of kunnapolis, inc.
ENGINEERS& ARCHITECTS
Date: EEI_l4. c0 ReP, J(�j mr .,n&..,ehu,.a .. ,.,.. .... e.. 1248
(I) FOR INLET CONTROL, (0). FOR'OUTLET CONTROL, (M)-FOR'-MENU
NORMAL DEPTH, PIPES
FLOW RATE,CFS :5.5
PIPE DIA., INCHES :12
MANNING'S 'n' :.013
PIPE SLOPE, FT./F.T. :.0663
'NORMAL DEPTH OF FLOW 0.,56
VELOCITY AT NORMAL DEPTH 12.119
(R);TO REPEAT; (M)-FOR.�kNU
]7ESIy1.1OF QU"fl- 07c.GT1o1:1
•
.i_
vo" I4,17.FY� ...
GSt= Co"c(so TZNpavncn 1= sit
i ,

\�
�--
/
2.
-
,
•&
.� �
. W
|

TO I DATE
ROMIn/pQ� IA`,AnS, �Po,EAEAD .E TTER®
IvA•� L /4"LlKC1A/Jl 4
aIi lv;� tl
�711L � fI/I�.LLt�� ll� d'/.ir�i3►�:i1?it
ME55A E
,jd
/d�
/ fdA
MIA
SII NED (r
�RSSnbIaE�[.r+,,..w
inr.evrw...�o N
REPLY
SENOEQ: OETACH AND RETAIN VELLOW COPY, SEND WHITE AND PINK COPI[S

_�
_.. �� .
_,. _,
JI �
•. .. .)i..i •� � ,. J r.i... �. ....,
_,,.

uy FFBCF��F
State of North Carolina 0 Q
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources POgpry S9!
Division of Land Resources SE'
James G. Martin, Governor (A�}'Charles H. Gardner
W1111am W. Cobey, Jr., secretary lif'tMart�J Director
Dear
We are in receipt of your: "rP�
Mining permit application for
Mining permit modification for P_ r�- -Y/ �J"
Mining permit renewal for JL 4r( b/[at+aar^. tu�*:rK✓(Yr—NW—LLUsa
Sees as authorized by the 1990 North Carolina General Assembly in G.S. 143B - 290 and as set
forth in the fee schedule adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission 15A NCAC 5B.0012.
Please remit by check or money order
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. 0 -
NOT SEND CASH. Payments should be mailed to:
Attention: Beth Studenberg, G�•T�/
Assistant Mining Specialist CFt,t.'AF-
Division of Land Resources F�r%rMle✓�.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Full payment must bereceived by this office within 30 days or your materials will be returned
unprocessed. -
A copy of the fee schedule as adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission is attached. The
section pertaining to the materials that you have submitted has been highlighted. See the fee
schedule for further explanation. If you have any additional questions, please call our office.
�7�g �N�i �e✓•YAr4�-�/��olet�.I�tf+v�J.
attachment LC, �'- o. {IM0
'P.O. Box 27687 a Melgh. N.C.27611-7687 a Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Alfinnatf Action Employer

MINING
* A nonrefundable permit application
fee when filing; for a new
mining permit, a major permit modification or a
renewal permit as follows:
TYPE ACRES**
NEW PERMIT
MAJOR
RENEWAL
MODIFICATION
Clay 1 but less than 25
$500
$250
$250
25 but less than 50
1000
500
500
50 or more
1500
500
500
Sand & 1 but less than 5 150 100 100
Gravel,
Gemstone, 5 but less than 25 250 100 100
and Borrow
Pits 25 but less than 50 500 250 500
50 or more 1000 500 500
Quarry,
l but less than 10
250
100
100
Industrial
Minerals,
10 but less than 25
1000
250 C �� >�
500
Dimension
Stonc
25 but less than 50
1500
500
500
50 or more
2.500
Soo
500
Peat & i or more 2500 500 500
Phosphate
Gold (Heap 1 or more 2500 500 500
Leach),
Titanium &
Others
• A nonrefundable $50.00 permit application processing fee is required for minor permit modifications. Minor permit modifications include ownership transfers,
name changes and bond substitutions. A minor pcmtit modification also includes lands added to a permitted arcs, outside of the rninimtan permit buffer zone
requirements, wham no plans for mining related disturbance or the added lands have been approved. All other changes are considered major modifications.
* * Acres for new permits and renewal permits means the total acreage at the site. Acres for major modification of permits means that area of land affected by the
modification within the permitted mine area, or any additional land that is to be disturbed and added to an existing permitted area, or both.
10190

FUIiM NV- `J lu-4w 1
Vulcan
MIDEAST DIVISION
P,0. DRAWER 4195
VVINSTON-SALEM NORTH CAROUNA 27115.4195
SUPPLIER'S
INVOICE NO.
INVOICE DATE
OUR'
ENTRY NO.
"
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
MO.
DAY
YR.
• 0
250 •00
STATEMENT OF REMITTANCE I DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

.1 31 �4 u1
m
FORM NO 91&RDOI
'Vulcan
MIDEAST DM ION
P.O. DINNER 4195
SUPPLIER'S
INV016EN0.
INVOICE DATE
OUR
ENTRY NO,
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
yD
[ o
't50.0U
STATEMENT OF REMITTANCE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G- Martin, Governor ^' i�Q r Charles H. Gardner
Willam W. Cobey, Jr.. Secrecary Director
Dear:
We are in receipt of your.
Mining permit application for
Mining pemtit modification for
✓ Mining permit renewal for �w
/3
tees as authorized by the 1990 North Carolina General Assembly in G.S. 143B - 290 and as set
forth in the fee schedule adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission 15A NCAC 5B.0012.
Please remit by check or money order IfV;0.6o ire— 13payable to to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources..DO /
NOT SEND CASH. Payments should be mailed to:
Attention: Beth Smdenberg 0
Assistant Mining Specialist CktiF�
Division of Land Resources Noe71�u7rn✓�
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Full payment must be received by this office within 30 days or your materials will be returned
unprocessed. I -
A copy of the fee schedule as adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission is attached. The
section penailung to the materials that you have submitted has been highlighted- See the fee
schedule for further explanation. If you have any additional questions, please call our office.
cc: �Buli /.UCCU—� /y Ci
attachment
—�NhFr�S Fal.—�{pur._CBo/tzf°Po�l
P.O. Box 27687 • Meigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
M Equal Opportunity Alrinnadve Action Employer

MINING
• A nonrefundable pernin application fee when filing for a new mining permit, a major permit mod ificn[ion or a
renewal permit as follows'
TYPE ACRES** NEW PERMIT MAJOR RI;NEWAl.
MODIFICATION
Clay 1 but less than 25 $500 5250 5250
25 but less than 50 1000 500 500
50 or more 1500 500 - 500
Sand & I but less than 5 150 100 100
Gravel,
Gemstone, 5 but less than 25 250 100 100
and Borrow
Pits 25 but less than 50 500 250 500
50 or more 1000 50D SDO
Quarry,
1 but less than 10
250
100
100
Industrial
Minerals,
10 but less than 25
1000
250 12p AC;Etji>)
S00
Dimension
Stone
25 but less than 50
1500
500
500
SO er more
- 2500
500
500
Peat & I or more 2500 500 500
Phosphate
Cold(flcap 1 or more 2500 500 500
Leach),
Titanium &
Olhcrs
• A mmrerwdable $5000 report aPPlimuon proprieties fm is «wimd for mirmr men it modifications. Minor permia madilicati indodc a, mhip members.
name changer aM bond Ab+urvti es. A miror formal modineauon allo insisted; lands added to a pealed am, ouuidc of me mudmmn permit nipper zme
mprirmnens, where no plans for mining aela del dumrleme of at added lands have bcm approved. All mhv chango am conaidond mfim modifications.
Ames far new permits and renewal porous mom me tout apeags at gm site, Alto for major medalisdm of pamiu mom that am of land affmud by dm
mMJmavan within the armistice more aura, or any Premarital land mat is to be dismand and added 10 in existing pumiurA Arta, or ma.
10190

�i3s-/Y3i
e> is RF.CflUf0
State of North Carolina JAPJ 1 4 i991
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural ReSWrCeSAsEHvrno;u SECTION
Division of land Resources
James G. Martin. Govemor Charles H. Gardner
William W. Cobey, Jr.. Secretary January 10, 1991 Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Harris
Chief, Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Tracy Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section �OLv223247$js(
RE: Mining Permit Renewal Request
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry a
Mining Permit No. 86-03
Surry County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the min rmiriLy,
renewal request for the above referenced project. VMC has req Mi'y
that their mining permit be renewed for an additional ten (10) year
period.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of
the operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife_or-freshwater
fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)), 1Please respond by February 8, 19901so that
we may complete our review of`th-is request-within--dur stafutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications,
renewals and modification requests, this office will carefully review
all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that they
are sufficient to restrain erosion and offsite sedimentation. However,
any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and
freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes
to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact Mr.
Mike Poplin at [phone], ext. 2760, to set up a convenient date
and time.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
very much appreciated. Please return the attached documents with your
review comments as they are my only copies. Thanks!
TED/se
Attachments
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
P.O. Box 27687 r Ralelgh. N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Amrmatl Action Employer

Date
Subject ILAIri
v
M �-
- Message
X-� 6UYz
/..-
nn
ei
lb�
U
Signed
WplcoWnJmea
cvwnm�
�1 Speed L t ere
From //�'u� Dj S Date g 9
� - V
Reply
Signed
SENDER —DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES.

•,,kO
o'N.

Eal
State of North Carolina
rN
Ueparrment or rnvironment, nealm, and INatural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Charles H. Gardner
Wiliam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary January 10, 1991 Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Harris
Chief, Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Tracy Davis -IV
Mining S Ncc i u i is t,
Land Quality Section
RE: Mining Permit Renewal Request
Vulcan Materials Company
Elkin Quarry
Mining Permit No. 86-03
Surry County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit
renewal request for the above referenced project. VMC has requested
that their mining permit be renewed for an additional ten (10) year
period.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of
the operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater
fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by February 8, 1990 so that
we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications,
renewals and modification requests, this office will carefully review
all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that they
are sufficient to restrain erosion and offsite sedimentation. However,
any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and
freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes
to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact Mr.
Mike Poplin at [phone], ext. 2760, to set up a convenient date
and time.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
very much appreciated. Please return the attached documents with your
review comments as they are my 2n1y copies. Thanks!
TED/se
Attachments
cc: Mr..Doug Miller, P.E.
i}.v. �° A x 741 -elgh" N.C. 176:11=76-07 0 Telephone [phone]✓3
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
RENEWAL
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G. S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971", Mining Permitting Regulation 15
N.C.A.C. 5B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Vulcan Materials Company , permittee
for the operation of a Crushed Stone Quarry
entitled, Elkin Quarry permit no. 86-3
and located in Sorry County, which shall provide
that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands
and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

2 Of 7
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, here-
inafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved Recla-
mation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclmation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise,the
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that
the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with
reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and con-
ditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and requirements
of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written notice of its
intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right
to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to
the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Cnnd i r•i nnc
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air quality,
surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by the Environmental
Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until Septpstber 27, 1992
and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74--46,
et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

3 of 7
1. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with
permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the Division of Environ-
mental Management.
2. Any mining process producing air contaminant emissions shall be subject to
the permitting requirements and regulations promulgated by the Division of
Environmental Management.
3. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural water-
course.
4. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent
surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to
the affected land.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion
control measure, structure or device. In any event, exposed slopes or
any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage
due to siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with ground
cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools
of water that are, or are likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary
structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or
installed when required to prevent such conditions.
7. The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided,
the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of ground motion
shall not exceed one inch per second at the immediate location of any
building regularly occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or institutional
building,
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 12B decibels linear (dBL)-
warning, 132 dBL caution, and 135 dBL maximum as measured at the
immediate location of any regularly occupied building such as any
dwelling house, church, school, public building, or commercial or
institutional building.

4 of 7
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that
flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily
or permanently guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond
the guarded area, it shall be reported to the Department immediately,
who will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause.
Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the permit.
D. Operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing:
.the total number of holes; pattern of holes; depth of holes; total
pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of
stemming and burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall
be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided
to the Department upon request.
E. Operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a period
for which notice is requested.
8. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained l)r!tween any excavation and any adjoining
property line to prevent caving of that property and to allow grading of the
sideslopes to the required angle.
physical b-arrconsisting, of a fence or boulder barriers, etc., shall
7. A p<<y 5�ca� uuia. �.cr _
be maintained around the perimeter of any quarry highwall.
10. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the
mine and public throughfares whenever practical to screen the operatic^ from
public view.
11. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
12. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S-. 74-54 in the form of
$25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the quarry operation as
indicated on the approved application. This security must remain in force
for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the
bonded acreage.

5 of 7
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which
is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally,
the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues
beyond the term of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G. S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in Roll; Rand, gravel and other uncon-
solidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility
of slides and be consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided
in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for
the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined
area that are, or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic
and reforestation practices as established by the N.C. Agricultural
E,.-periment Station and the N.C. Forest Service.
b. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation
Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according
to the time schedule included in the plan, which shall to the extent
feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in
any event, initiation of reclamation at the earliest practicable time after
completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with ground water, barricade along
the top of any highwall, and grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated
material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for
the planned future use are as follows:
A. A physical. barrier consisting of a fence or boulder barriers, etc., shall
be maintained around the perimeter of any quarry highwall.
B. Any cut or fill slopes in overburden or other unconsolidated material shall
be traded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. grade or flatter and terraced as
necessary to insure slope stability.

6 of 7
C. The stockpile, office and process plant areas shall be graded and
cmnnhi-;nri
D. Any settling ponds or sediment basins shall either be backfilled and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into lake areas.
E. No contaminants shall be dumped at the mine site. Scrap metal, trash
or other such waste shall be removed from the site and properly disposed.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
G. Any excavated, diverted, or disturbed natural channels shall be stabilized.
3_ Revegetation Plan:
Revegetation and reforestation of the affected areas will consist of the
following measures:
A. Site preparation including grading, ditching, and cultivating will be
carried out effectively in order to revegetate and/or reforest. Reason-
able efforts will be made to correct minor soil deficiencies through the
application of fertilizers, mulches, etc. Local climate, topography, and
soil conditions will dictate revegetation and reforestation efforts.
B. Revegetation will be ccmpleted through the proper application of the
following:
1. Preparation of seed bed - 3 to 4 inches.
2. Affected areas to be seeded with a ccmbination of 45 pounds Sericea
lespedeza and 45 pounds fescue. (Scarified lespedeza in the Spring
and unscarified in the Fall).
3. Fertilizer - 1000 pounds of 5-10-10 per acre.
4. Lime - 2 tons per acre.
5. Mulch - Approximately 80 bales per acre.
C
All applications to be spread uniformly over the affected area.
C. Reforestation will be ccmpleted through the proper application of the
following:
1. Virginia Pines will be used on slopes where it has been determined
that it is too steep (greater than 1� horizontal to 1 vertical) to
hold a seed bed.

7 of 7
2. White pines will be used for screening and beautification programs.
4. Reclamation Schedule:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent
feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible
after canpletion or termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be cccnpleted within two
years of completion or termination of mining.
Permit issued this the Z 7 day of 19,6 Z-.
BY:
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Cammunity Development.

- - --- - -- - -- ----,Z ��- : �- - ------
--- - - - ---- .�,_� Z�,--------
-- - ------ -- ----�=,�Q------
C1 .✓.ri v �vrry �,...-,r-�r%�� r�.0 --...i v E- 7y�ir'�`Y7dp
—_—___ __-__ ___..... ______ V .___-�_YT __ _ -
�J�/`r — 4� —xn�- ioy�� _

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Application for a Mining Permit
G. S. 74-50 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, The Mining Act of 1971"...
After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in mining without having first
obtained from the Department an operating permit which covers the affected land
and which has not terminated, been revoked, been suspended for the period in
question, or otberwiae become invalid,
1. Name of Mine Elkin Quarry County Surry
2. Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company
3. Home Office Address P. 0. Box 4195, Winston Salem, N.C. 27105
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Office Address P. 0. Box 71. rIk;n m r PAF21
T Telephone [phone]
6. Mine Manager Clete Mash
a
? We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the best
�,= tj of our knowledge. We fully understand
a "•^. that any willful misrepresentation of
G-2:D facts will be cans for permit revocation.
� $F-�'j\ON 1' •Signature
age rraham
Title Vice President Operations
Date August 13, 19B2
*Signature of company officer required.

2
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned 15.2 Acres leased 127.6
2. Materials mined: Granite
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground Q
Shove l and Truck DAgl irie and Truck Q Self -loading Scraper
Other Surface Mining
4. Present depth of mine 180 Ft.
5., Expected maximum depth of mine 210 Ft.
b. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive and has
not been reclaimed: None
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1.0
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total aLLected acreage:
a.
Area
used for tailing ponds
1.8
acres
b.
Area
used for stockpiles
_ 7.7_
acres
c.
Area
used for waste piles
_ 0.5
acres
d.
Area
used for processing plants
2.1
acres
e.
Area
of active mine excavation.
20.7
acres
f.
Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by
mining 1
g, Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 3= 3 acres
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g 35.8 acres

3
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total affected acreage figure from B,
2 equals acreage to be bonded.
0 - 4.99 acres ($ 2,500 bond)
ED 5 - 9.99 acres ($ 5,000 bond)
10 - 24.99 acres ($12,500 bond)
25+ acres ($25,000 bond)
4. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining operations
in North Carolina? Yes No
Check the amount of blanket bond:
$2,500 0 $12,500 0
$5,000 $25,000 177
C. Protection of Natural Resources
1. What precautions will be taken during mining operations -to prevent
significant adverse effects on wildlife, or freshwater, estaurine or
marine fisheries? Where applicable, current "state of the
art" methods of air and water pollution control, Erosion
and sediment control will be implemented.
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine?
Yes El No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Division of
Environmental Management, Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development.
NPDES #NC0005371 Expiration Date 6-30-83
z rS0 therean air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
J • 1V
Yes FX No ll
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Division of
Environmental Management, Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development.
#2661R Expiration Date 4-1-8�

F. N. 576- 3
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
Application for a Mining Permit
Article 7 of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, 'The
Mining Act of 1971" ...After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in
mining without having first obtained from the Department an operating
permit which covers the affected land and which has not terminated, been
revoked, been suspended for the period in question, or otherwise become
1.
Name
of
Mine ELKIN QUARRY
County SIIRRy
2.
Name
of
Company VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
C. I I :I. 7SQ6 WTNcYrON qu I•
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail SAME AS ABOVE
7lo 1-SYo o°
. cph 919-7 2-o3rr-
5. Mine Office Address P. 0, BOA 71, ELKIN, N. C. 28621
Telephone [phone]
6. Mine Manager MR. B_ S. .TONES
We hereby certify that all details
can p--n- uin this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the
best of our knowledge. We fully
understand that any willful mis-
representation of facts will be
cause for permit evo t on.
*Signature
Title S. PAGE GRAHAM - VICE PRES OPERATION:
Date NNE 29, 1972
*Signature of company officer required.

APPLI.C:A'T'1ON FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1_ Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned Acres leased _125,.0, Approx.
2. Materials mined: GRANITE
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge ❑ Underground
Shovel and Truck Dragline and Truck E] Self -loading Scraper
Other OPEN PIT QUARRYING
4. Present depth of mine 118 ft.
5. Expected maximum depth of mine 148 ft.
6. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map,)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive as
of July 1, 1972: NONE
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site .25
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage:
a. Area used for tailing ponds 1.80 acres
b. Area used for stockpiles 13.19 acres
c. Area used for waste piles 1.28 acres
d. Area used for processing plants .56 acres
e. Area of active mine excavation as of July 1, 1972 10.03 acres
f ESt ritate annua i acreage of i�ew latid disturbed by
mining , 22
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 3= .66 acres
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g 27,74 acres

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C.
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total affected acreage figure from B,
2 equals acreage to be bonded.
❑ 0 - 4.99 acres ($ 2,500,bond)
❑ 5 - 9.99 acres ($ 5,000 bond)
❑ 10 - 24.99 acres ($12,500 bond)
® 25+ acres ($25,000 bond)
4. Vill your company file a blanket bond covering all. of its mining opera-
tions in North Carolina? Yes ® No ❑
Check the amount of blanket bond:
$2,500 ❑ $12,500 ❑
$5,000 ❑ $25,000 K7
1. What aspect of your mining operation may have significant effect on wild-
life, or freshwater, estuarine or marine fisheries?
NONE
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine'.
Yes :9 No ❑
If ;rcoy i dic..ate the approval U0l.U111C11L iiuiiuCL issiieu uy the Office of Wafer
and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
NDING Expiration Date
b. Is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Ye s ❑ No ZS
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of
Water and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources,
Expiration Date
3. If your mining excavation will come within 300 feet of any neighboring
6

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
dwelling house, school, church, hospital, commercial or industrial
building, public building or public road, describe methods to prevent
physical hazard to such features.
Operations at such sites are carried on in a manner which affords
every possible protection to any feature in close proximity to the
operation. Blasting is limited to specified times of day and the amount
of explosive detonated at any one time is held below safe levels. Prior
warning is given before blasting. Pit areas are also fenced and marked.
4. Describe measures to be taken to insure against (1) substantial deposits
of sediment in stream beds or lakes, (2) landslides, (3) acid water
pollution.
. The Company will comply with all water quality standards established
by the State and Federal Governments. Settling ponds will be constructed
wherever they are deemed necessary. These ponds will be cleaned period-
ically in order to maintain their effectiveness.
Slopes to pits and overburden disposal areas will be maintained so
as to avoid erosion. Grading and seeding of these areas as well as rip -
rapping of banks will be carried out so as to avoid, landslides.
Settling ponds will be used to deter the dispersion of any toxic
material, although at present, no known source of acid producing material
exists at any of our operations '

Rec latrat ion Plan
1. Describe your intended plan for the reclamation.and subsequent use of all
affected lands and indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming
this land.
Preliminary reclamation work will be carried out in conjunction with
the mining operation,where practicable, with the completion of such work
upon abandonment of the site. However, such preliminary work does not in
any way suggest that our mining operation at that site is being concluded.
With the expansion of the pit area, all slopes will be graded and seeded,
where possible, to reduce the possibility of slides and erosion. In areas
where grading or site preparation is in progress, care will be taken .to
avoid the siltation or sedimentation of adjoining streams and lakes; dur-
ing operations at a site, adequate settling ponds will be maintained to
prevent any untreated water from plant processes from. being discharged
into any stream or lake until it meets the water quality standards of. the
Corps of Engineers. Specific areas will be designated -as fills and used
for the disposal of refuse from the mining operation, however, no fill
area used for the disposal of contaminants such as used motor, oils or
cleaning solutions will be maintained in a location which might allow
these substances to pollute any adjoining stream or lake. Upon comple-
tion of mining operations, all refuse, metal scr.ap,and concrete pourings
will be removed from affected areas or buried in fills; spoil banks will
,be graded so as to blend into the surrounding terrain. Final grading and
filling will be accomplished in a manner complementary to the topography
.of the affected area and Will allow -for adequate runoff of ground water
and the retardation of erosion. Areas designated as suitable for reclam-
ation as lakes will be graded and sloped to present an attractive ,
accessable shoreline which would not be subject to erosion or slides.
Vegetation of all areas affected by the operation will be accomp-
lished through the planting of grasses and tree seedlings, the exact
types of which will vary from operation to operation as local climate
and soil conditions dictate. Accepted conservation practices will be
adhered to throughout the reclamation process in an effort to return
the area to as nearly an original state as feasible. Pit areas will be
well fenced and marked and approaches to the pit will be sloped, graded,
acid seeded to prevent the possibility of slides. Subsequent use of a
pit as a resefvoir or a sanitary landfill will be subject to negotiation
with the appropriate authorities, based on the local requirements for
such a facility.

Reclamation flan
f
2. Indicate what practices you will take to protect adjacent surface resources.
Where practicable, trees and grasses will be planted to aid as an erosion
control medium and as a buffer zone between mining operations and adjacent
surface resources.
3. State the method of prevention or elimination of conditions that will be
hazardous to animal or fish life in or adjacent to the affected areas:
Slopes of overburden areas will be grassed in order to prevent any
erosion and subsequent siltation of lakes and streams in the area of the
operation.
4. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
excavations in rock.
Pit areas will be fenced and marked in order to avoid creating hazard-
ous conditions, Blasting is carried out in accordance Bureau of Mines stan-
dards and in such a manner as to afford every possible protection to• surround-
ing persons and property.
5. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
Where practicable, trees and shrubs will be used for screening
these operations from public view,
6. State the method of rehabilitation of settling ponds if to be reclaimed
during the life of the permit.
Settling ponds will be dredged periodically in order insure their
proper function. Where practicable, these ponds will be reclaimed as lakes,
otherwise, they will be filled, graded, and grassed.

Reclamation Plan
7, State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of mining refuse:
All.metal and lumber scrap will be taken from the site or removed to
a designated area to be used, along with other mining refuse, as fill mat-
erial and subsequently buried. Areas used for such will be graded and grassed.
ContaminanLs such as used motor oils and greases will be disposed of in
such a manner as to preclude their polluting of streams and lakes in the
area of the operation.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of stream channels and
stream beds to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution:
Where necessary, streams will be dredged and cleared of any material
which might impede the free and natural flow of the.stream, providing, of
course, that the prevention of such conditions is within the control of
the mining operation, and not the result of negligence of any party up-
stream of the operation. All grading along stream banks and ground water
runoff areas will be carried out in accordance with good conservation prac-
tices followed by grassing of such areas so as to minimize erosion. Where
deemed necessary, stream banks will be rip -rapped.
9. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting
or remaining in mined areas.
Mined areas will be graded and -sloped so as to maintain continuity
of the terrain and provide natural runoff, thus prohibiting the formation
of pools of stagnant, noxious water.
10. Describe how the surface gradient in tlncon.,;n1j jatPfj materials wi11 be re-
stored to a condition suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the.land
after reclamation is completed and proposed method of accomplishment:
Large unconsolidated materials such as rip -rap and boulders which have
been unearthed during stripping and site preparation will be used in fill
areas wherever possible. Final filling will be accomplished with the use
of available stockpiles of overburden and topsoil, followed by grading of
the disturbed areas as a means of restoring the surface gradient to a con-
sistency suitable for the type of revegetation planned. Upon vegetation
of these areas, subsequent fertilization and cultivation will be performed
in order to insure the survival of the plant life, where necessary.
3

Reclamation Plan -'
11. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the
affected areas. Note requirement of Regulation Number 1.'
Revegetation and reforestation of the affected areas will consist of
the following measures:
1. Site preparation including grading, ditching, and cultivating
will be carried out effectively in order to revegetate and/or
reforest. Reasonable efforts will be made to correct minor
soil deficiencies through the application of fertilizers, mulches,
etc. Local climate, topography, and soil conditions will dic-
tate revegetation and reforestation efforts.
2. Revegetation will be completed through the proper application
of the following:
., a.Preparation of seed bed-- 3 to 4 inches.
b. Affected areas to be seeded with a'combination of 45 lbs.
Sericca Lespedeza and 45 lbs. fescue. (Scarified Lespedeza
In the Spring and unscarified in the Fall)
c. Fertilizer--1,000 lbs. of 5-10-10 per acre.
d. Lime--2 tons per acre.
e. Mulch--Approx. 80 bales per acre.
All applications to be spread uniformly over the affected area.
3. Reforestation will be completed through the proper application
of the following:
a. Virginia Pines will be used on slopes where it has been
determined that it is too steep (greater than I' to 1)
to hold a seed bed.
b. White Pines will be used for screening and beautification
programs. _
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature
Palma Alaferfals Company
MIDEAST DIVISION Title �-:__
P. 0.Ca�l Box N.
C. /emu �� 4 V s" `.
Winston-Salem, N. C. 2710q Agency CC/�
cF7c/H.t�KJJ- 1 Lec-..�._ A� /9 z Date 7
4

Reclamation Plan
12. Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of Section 8 of this Act.

LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right of entry and travel upon our lands or operation during
regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field
inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the
administration of this Act, so long as the Department or its appointed
representatives are accompanied by an agent or representative of our
Company.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right to make whatever entries on the land as may be reasonably
necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary
in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to
complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to Section 14.
*Signed 4�
Title S_ PAGE GRAHAM -VICE PRES, OPERATIONS
Mine ELKIN QUARRY
Company VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
*Signature should be the same as the officer who signed the application for
a permit.

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources 111 ''r' -
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Matt r I �Y
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME H, a: ., Ra,40A.1 2. MINING PERMIT# rftr_ erx-I
&OPERATOR Vulr4N OCInl 0444 4.000NTY 5,/QoV
5. ADDRESS O. n. ai 4 7 A! W, ./.w,...-4eb,,,, nl/ �7i/S- //_gCj
6. Person (s) contacted at site /.-„ er,.d _
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? Yes No 8. Pictures ? Yes {]No
9. Date last inspected: 10. Any mining since last inspection? QYes No
_/_1
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Yes Q No
If no, expain:,%chl
J
L'(,J7 l]/)NCa
/IP },a,/4 )r✓ 77m<n,/s .}A/y<.^s NO A/pits {/•/./?c I 4/� �/' G/AIO f++n..n
.i)l.n// /rny.l.i//P/ r,)*.� `i.�(. //rl// ��< ♦} /< hi�p )J/..3,� l�b �ns,ii
A<SC /..CA r eC A, F/. Lar rs�I
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? Ez Yes ❑ No
If no, explain: "
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? ❑ Yes p No If yes, describe Ile type
and severity of the damage: /e/nr
14. Corrective measures needed and /or taken:
-eenC66gz 4/./r
=` <r < Z_//
L,�. nn./Alit„<.mnl ;) �a�-r.i. ..G ama .) ra.%r.;.. /4� L ,�..,/,✓
15. Other recommendations and comments: it fLae.Yck r)n//�. r� Awlr:,.F•,.< ,h.Ds/.. .ad
±J_n !'I .u.l{r:.twn �rr r/rr i0 N✓S./.[,.� .f/iN0%/ OMIn.K /n.✓S,w i1..4i �.-t l/GF
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report+/ -'map accurate ? 0 Ye's ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? QYes ❑ No Proposed date / /L1=✓
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report �_. 19. Copy of Report senl to operator 6 / 6 /mil' .
(date)
INSPECTED BY: Q€w� DATE: 44 12 7 1 7r/
Phone No: (110) Dib - `2nn�
White ra to file /n Ica Yellow m to a em or Pink PY 40r . 4: oo PY P copy to Mining Specialist
sim
ix�

Prc.FIVED
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section mN . 7 jyyU
MINE INSPECTION REPORT LANp nuaun SWIM
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME Z4-&I / I�7Xre 4.4 / 2. MINING PERMIT If 96-3
3. OPERATOR I /yL__CW /if-!c R/a / S eo. 4, COUNTY Sra ZAP
5. ADDRESS P'O. ear 4.23e . r f4s nIC 27/IS f$Ft /.✓
6. Person(s) contacted at site /Iro //i',/n.e/c.es s-r.•,/L t nC�/„/>eNoe•✓r
7. Was mine operating at time of inspeclion ? Yes ❑ No B. Pictures ? Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: -/ /7/26 10. Any mining since last inspection ? QX Yes ❑ No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? ❑ Yes m No
If,no, explain: 1//eeervas n> CoNorrto4s ZF1 Y � 4
SLeort A./. Caxe e4y SrC[.et.e r./Aw/ Z / /v n✓/60.•Go!
qnµ 1/ e✓dd. An.eA. A„r /'ta✓s Xe2e .6uJ6 Or ✓e LaalA To C xfANd
Y rfl .44 /e .o .F L. n.,.urr iPdAF Ace•mt 5 n,J Nbh'Tt/CAs r' GJO Oi
Q . Stu//S u✓ NoKTr tsI F.JA nA Q.T' A4Y TO LS L/✓a/AAGO
AJd Te e40d /J AI/A•C IK'(G/./. 4,en/4.,y Te SGFGR /NT[.NOe'.J T.
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? ❑ Yes © No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed anddor-lakenQ/Iicin,G dnn n•,/ Sr-Derv"r A•,rd od Noen/
!en eF 17cranrJ6s lJrYAe9Aa iU en A.4 GSrAX41SW 4-(rn4srord /�o
AJ00 //+ D/S LetSSe A.(L)/*ajaIAC Aeeh CNeeA OAS s 'A7 GNAs dX GFh /1
✓//✓rl e. ro r5 ed SrllpOiN6G A.'GA AS .Ors e Gsse6. fi1�CSe ePe. A✓O Sc'C6 T<K.
CG�G/rJT SceAe eN nre?rNWef> LJA e: /liY Or Osc us Sfd F%i leeeer lL-
SeDrne/r -r/.'4i5 C&. AJe,O amT
15. Other recommendations and commerds:SiNee. /esr _7 soeereA•Js 0feJet /2 d C>eo
WlT!l /JA4MOM6 S•t NS /ICea Nd ///e, A/ WAG L. 5"4 e/c
,yr lef GLeeed A. a See4e0. lVljxsenr WrsH fit>er 5+eNe fFar<eriew/
PEn✓jaded Ar P/O' reu74A4ee.0.) x/ ed 57eNr .AOedn5
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map accurate ? ❑K Yes No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
Q r eee0nJ6 /.),sr/ Aitr erred of IJnre.P AUAY' /'Zrer Sa0/e5 of Ae
/iN 45 d/S e°o SAC /re!w �D 5r44 1r,aeo ANd ✓4n 'V 6fee.1 i,NeS •GrS/srwe.
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑ Yes ©, No Proposed date r
18, No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 19. Copy of Report sent tooperator A / G 19 o .
5!///� (dale)
INSPECTED RY". ` L - DATE:
Phone No: (9//) 761 - Z3S/
White copy to rile YeCaw copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
vw

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, RECEIVE.,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
APR 1 a 199
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE) lArvo np4(Ily SECT
L/-'
1.MINENAME leld (Xu A/2RV 2. MINING PERMIT # 96-9
3.OPERATOR Vu Le4AI 14 >Cr rA S le. 4. COUNTY 5✓a eQ
5.ADDRESS 10 /ny 4259 W-5, dL 2711 ArTN: Mr KC A///rr✓
6. Person (a) contacted at site 7-/N 11?NZIA4fGf4 nrNG S,rPr.l r Nrr OCNT
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? ©Ves No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: A / 20 / A9 10. Any mining since last inspection ? Eyes No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Yes ® No
If no, explain: �t
?T
V/OL,4 ra ni CcNa/r14eJ.S-
./r 3- /- Ara nr li.rrL2 /lr4r /'. NanewofL nA n/rgrNrrAL rN S LrdNr.✓C,5 /7r?rrosAC
:Jf:li - l nA. a„w Sr A.r,iur r...IrA'ncS A-r /LeNr C,.I rCd Nce V /At 5-�ArFP.NGS
i/rfids4e>ALrA J/qs /./0s,.LT24 rN 5-rc T/r "T rrJr,! or STCe4r S.
1/S- rrrn /.Coewr, ,La s rN sr,E r/P.NC,S /ors>sAG AC.A Cn.rs,NG
it sf - /: u4" //,r.da d4L %dddeduArLG ✓ OL✓>[C'1/D F/Zd N �r dLrc Ace G J 5.
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation CondBions of the Permlt ? ❑Yes K.
If no, explain: !/mLnrroNs 0/ loNA/�r/DA S r/r 26 ANd -✓� 4
X26- SedAGf AAr 6e.du I. A7 S>etotrCr '>u.y.J 2r1 oN bwru
o Vrd bJ ,414 O'ZAjvAL ArfrA AND 4r2'/reOJNGs 4N4 .OrOP/NGS
Arf/dSAc //2rA/1.
erded rLLA"egrON r5 NoT Gr.NG CadOuerCD S/nuL-
VJ4-/+ue4J hr-
7ndto1.5N Wlrr/ Ay,NrNG /A% rVO zrrelA✓,NGS �iSBesdL A/LA,
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oltsile damage ? ©Yes ❑ No II yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage: /Node RL re T� L/r,er✓ .S,L rA- euAy d/ L/✓E
d)A- eLYeu,eSC L3CGnJ S9Y r,r/Jrnl/s cis Oa SAL ARCA.
JG,J../Tro nAorLA-rC trG .-n T /0.✓ oA Smr[GNr ,Trot T 41Aa,C-
r mrx m Ar
w.T.rcr
or
14.Corrective measures needed-and%Yor=taken: /-AN A4sNudre mJ4 (-u NAQrJ/CNS/✓fl
PIING S,r/ A04 NeSr /iG S,46rr,rrGp Foe 7L/J5 eyor xoek/- F/Ld.l
Moir 4440159 SET A,Y CYFAAL[ru/✓ F,NrS dnd!J /lumnxL CuurA'ol dr
FCeur Cv renueC. A,ve srarAL/NGs AN/ ArAfrNL.5 Q/SPOS AL AREA.
E-innr Jlnru_•i. AAecaxTL CnN rAdLS MNS> GG /�,a0✓/OCQ TO
A121Jr,rr QrJS..c sreGnLNYnr/oJ.
15. Other recommendations and comments: l/rr•/ J ,+ r IN, y,4rt✓ ro CCNPc•r
r111 i✓rrArJG' NrPA3Pnd
rnN3r'N1::.'. .'eAJ'rL Ye bnlN r�/.4 <•�/..r.'
PAur L c crr/iar,c Ors.rc sA L- Ai'Ln.
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report+/ -map accurate? Yes QN0lExplain)
❑Not Reviewed
A/</rs/N i//! �%87 aA /j70 41, /Ir/J r�'r T//L /r6No✓AL
ei OVLCduCJJ A, ANe o./C /'a✓GT/.vL �relx'r jGJ fJrS/d'SAL
AJCed- 5er errerE p//rcE OXTZAI 4�//O 1ST%
17. Follow-up inspection needed? aYes ❑ No Proposed date �i 1 1470
18. No. of addltional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator. / /7 / 7U.
�,/ y ,I (date
7 �O
INSPECTED BY: X . - .�MOm/iw DATE: Y 1 /
Phone No: (j jy) 76 / Z 3 S/
INbrte copy to rile yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
e®
ON
ALGA,

O
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Ar
Division of Land Resources, Land Ouality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
rr�� v
1. MINE NAME L�.�i.� l�,.nn nu 2. MINING PERMIT71 g� 3 �.r,
3. OPERATOR l/w�cn.,. �� /yl,d'{rr.fia/r CIJ 4. COUNTY
5.ADDRESS A�J-A&r 419.E 4f�7r/.r 9/9<
6. Person (s) contacted at site P ? i
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? ❑r. -Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? Q'Yes No
9. Date last inspected:/0 03 lyil 10. Any mining since last inspection ? yes ❑ No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Q'Yes❑'f- ❑ No
II no, explain:
7!e .<eTJ/� 'C$is//< /tare Qcr,.v n,�r� rn� Yoe �7rrvltreaO a:
—Z V
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions cf the Permit ? ©'Yes El No
11 no, explain: Aw,o eldeo k/bei a MA/C rJ .9Ae
INI*4/'i F//. Z-'/ /1r...,0..r Go
....rf/r.,//.!✓ /vr As //� � sf�tirrJ '
B
13, Did any of the above deficiencies result in oflsite damage? ❑ Yes [a -No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
15. Other recommendations and comments: r.�/.._. .cs�ti.,--17M,zZo'
se 7-Af IV
/ .✓ti(x
a ,waT.Crij• riJ n -i�de. .:d �r.x .G-P rss' -$
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/ - map aocuiate ? O Yes No (Explain) Not Reviewed
l.V l
u
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑Yes ®oNo Proposed date
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report— 19. Copy of Report sent to operator 4 1 Z/ 1W.
/J �[ (date)
INSPECTED BY:� /%:ems � 4,�a- it._DATE: `7 /
PhoneNo:
White ropy to file Yellow copy to operalor Pink copy to Mining Specialist
REV. vee

___�_
-.—_—� e__•.c
.; ccS2 l^"-let :v m1.1. �",
.vim =
nh 'mc,
9
b'�K ech), 1o'.wv'w. ',ab 1I e�
I
1 J C !II 1'; ITC, llou4l hg$z of webs,.^,j a:h;q
29Ut to Dit Gt:goti.�_
.. _ ,. 1,IE'•P rh if abGCt:ou L66l,'.q J L AG' ��
'l1u
6:nhoe
Pq y91f
., 1
ic
70,
"04ok d3c:.p" L^'Du°., tl; n^f:I'
.. L'b.s.
_,-.
fjlj .. •)" ri1:..'l4

MINE INSPECTION REPORT
Land Quality Section
1. Operator: 1/1 &A aj PNAlC f [N. 2. Mine Name Y,JIr f',v
3. County:. -C/12R.1a A. Is site permitted? yes
—No_ 5. P."eCmiC�No. pqp,' 3
1 �1 //,� \\
6. Person(a) Contacted:( •.i,l7�iS V/r%.1 �PXililn� PG.y, �h U
ro s
7. Was mine operating at time ��ojjf inspection? Yea VNo 8. Pictures?JYe6 (i'No+/
9. Date Last Inspected:4/0XIO. Any mining since last inspection? rYesvNo
11. If mine is not under permit cite evidence of recent mining activity:
1
12. Are public safety provisions in compliance with the permit? Yes V1�No_
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the permit?
Yes 1/INo_ If no, explain: %fiL La01X. <C,G//�/L4 GG.PI LUi
=
.1._et Ps 940 r'i fnT
14. Is the ermine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the permit?
Yes ✓ No_ If no, explain:
15. Did any of thhe.above deficiencies result in offsite sedimentation?
Yes No ,/ If yes, what measures are needed? mno. YU/o
J
16. Is the�Annual Reclamation Report and map accurate?
explain
17. Other recommendations and comments
18. Folrav;-up inspection needed? Yes No 1/ Proposed date:
19. Copy of report sent to operator? Yes/(`/ #IbH No J No. of add'l pages %
(date) �]J
INSPECTED BY:J//"f(/J/,a.nsul/ DATE: /b

` _ ^ LAND QUALITY SECTION
PROJECT: &iAJ / ,q 1 AA MA, Page aof Z
I
1 ' )
ock
INSPECTED

INSPECTED BY.._Z&dB6 eT/1�L.�veginp v��g__
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: Ky.,wU dTE&1,gLS CO. 'Count 'FV
Mine: ELK/N Qy Permit Number.,
Date Inspected: OG7-, 02,/97¢ Date of last inspection.:
Prod,,:,t: CQuSyED ST/JNE _ person Contacted:
I. -Remarks - Measures Taken
A, Erosion Control:. /2e,rT SPA/yAGE eUCO61&//L 7L QiT
1zPiissED seen OAJ
B. Waste Disposal:_ /Le .ugly LUn syE /r/�tE�PiAL.
C. Reclamation:, Aga `%2 SELJ a?aLlaa-OF ,BE4'7 aN WEST
'Two EYGELLCNT SEb/MENT i�oNaS LdE.PE BU/1T �ijN6 flD
II- Annual Reports - Adequacy of,plan
f1OEQVR_rE—.'D/DN'T�EivTioN NEuJ .3 ETT4N� t'�o.�as. _�„�„^,_._
�WOOAW175741MM
Deficiency letter needed - Letter Sent 74/Rein spection Needed__

State of North Carolina '
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine ELKIN QUARRY Permit Number 86-3
County SURRY Telephone [phone]
Name of Company VULCAN MATERIALS CO.
Mailing Address gyp). 0. BOA 4195, WINSTON SALEM, N. C. 27105
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date DNA
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
1.0
+or-
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
-0-
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
1.0
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
3.0
+or-
Acres
TOTAL
5.0
+or-
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 5.0 +or-
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds -0- Acres (c) Waste Piles n Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine Excavation -0- Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Grading and seeding wastepile areas.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Office Engineer
Date 9/24/74
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

INSPECTED BY: / FTE
NO.�/ _—
Company: 1611C/J /V ///��/,��F_,P/ALS
Mine: 5.LA'!n/ O/. / Permit Number: g(l-3
Date Inspected:_-E,r?. /T /97'f�- Date of last inspection:
Product: C.c�USfdd 7 TAlJE Person Contacted: i/Q77
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control: .1,1241 MC.c - zZd 0&7 /.c/T!_=/2N4G 7n e!Lr OR _--_
.�ETTULJr' Pa /J.1�
B, Waste Dicer ,' • , k /) S-L&zd)(
4E/1V(.• //SFA /nl fJflhf '_T /�r,P/Y OAl !✓.ESi
C. Reclamation: �4!!7<i n F .P) 7'
/n/ .Q2eOU/IZ2
II, Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
L'DUA — /7/nivT /�fr�v�/on/ nJEuJ �n/J nQ ls���M —
RECOMMENUTIONS & COMMENTS;
fJCKnI Qc,�1l.F_/7F,�E /S/i
Deficiency letter needed p Letter Sent "2 -/mil Reinspection Needed

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by roles and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the ➢apartment."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971" p
Name of
Mine Xwo EJ
s
Permit Number SCE- B.
county
)UV1 P.I
Telephone
�419i
7335- 1439
Name of
Company VLALe. Ra
MRTLmknLC
s Co.
Mailing
Address ?-0 - r we
41g s
W I w5l)CM - SACEM
20710S
a
1. If mine is now inactive,
indicate date
of termination of mining.
Datef�i� A
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining
in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
- O -
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
. D—
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
_p -
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
-' O -
Acres
TOTAL . O � Acres
4. Describe measures taken ccf��or erosion control. f�
Ci-2{}DIA1 �' I aJITcHINF � PIPINa RtvD .7e�DIn.)G
QFFRS Foil COw)TR.OL O(:' RutJOFi= WFITEIL
%tJD 61�TQTiotJ
5• Indicate amount of reclamation
carried
out in last 12
months.
(a) Tailings Ponds
—D -
Acres
(c) Waste Piles
—O - Acres
(b) Stockpiles
Acres
(d) Mine Excavation
Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
CrRF�I>IAvC� ARID SEEDfVJC- OI=FICE RND
EoO1h ACC F'FLCP.
Signature of person responsible for
Title OFFICE CJ'JG/M§LeX,.
Date 9 — Zen —
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

November 21t 1975-
Mr. E. K. Graham
Vulcan Materials Company
P. 0. Box 4195
Winston-Salems North Carolina 27105
Dear Mr. Graham:
on November 189 1975 an annual inspection of the Elkin Quarry in Surry
County- was made as required by G. S. 74-56 of "The Mining Act of 1971.11 All
conservation activities and reclamation practices.were found to be in com-
pliance with the provisions of your mining permit. '
One recommendation I would like to make is that the inside of the berm
an the west side of the quarry be revegetated next spring. I understand from
Mr. Curtis Foster that plans call for deepening the quarry on the western side'
near the berm. Since the berm must be vegetated for final reclamation anyway,
it would probably be easier to vegetate the berm now while you can,get to it'
with a hydro-eeeder. I feet that it would also be beneficial to you as far
as keeping slides out of the pit and for safety purposes. It could be a real
problem to vegetate the berm after the adjacent upper bench is removed: Al-
though the bare elopes are causing no offeite problems I hope that you will
consider -this recommendation in .your future plans.
i
Please contact me if you have any questions or if -I can be of assistance
to you.
Very truly yours
Robert H. Livermonf Jr.
Regional Engineer
RHL jrAch
0

�,.✓b M/LEER.
IN:iPEC9'ION IiEI'OI[P
Con:���, iy:-
�u t,CAN �'/ATE2i AC5 C19.
CoUnl.
JJ 2.2Y
467ka,4 �y
Permit
Number.
Dal,r. Inspected: N v. AV, /g/S
Date
of last
inspeeti=
Oe .
Prodc.:t: 42p3Nea 37b.YE
Person
Contacted:
I:f zTps
Fasra_e
1.. Remarks - Measures Taken
A, Erosion Control:_ZL�Ai„ g $ S�/tFAtE 2✓NOFF Awjlse JL '7z 9/T.
B- Waste Disposal: h1417E 016➢D /n/ GRatf/FER .eYN iy/K o2
C. Re-.aamation: A/oNf 5/NCE e-a r—
II. Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
40C&VRYE _
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMIUNTS: iVSiaa of BERiN oN wEST s/nt of cnivA2ay ___
WAS SeEDE;p RnID 6Y2H Esrg BL/3N6D . RJ%
_ Gomm F_Nn PC-'SE/_-�/N.4 /-JH/LE %hEY LFN S7-YAL G.-E'T "T i> l J7T& /i
_iLYP /5'EEaEQ F2cn �E[na✓. _._....
_____ HEY !LA✓E Gi-O;�Erl C/,2 cviT WASTE HlA 7E•R SYSTEM A"N�7 �/t12E __
De1:i;.1.ency letter needed Letter Sent /%-o^�'%� Reinspection Needed__

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T 1 0 N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of
Mine ELKIN
Permit
Number 86-3
County
SORRY
Telephone (919)
835-1439
Name of Company VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
Mailing Address P. 0. BOX 4195, WINSTON-SALEM, N. C. 27105
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date NA
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
-0-
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
-0-
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
-0-
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
-0-
Acres
TOTAL
-0-
Acres
3• Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
Maintain proper drainage control patterns for run-off water.-
0-
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds .0- Acres (c) Waste Piles -0- Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine Excavation -0- Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for
Title
Date 9-26-75
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0, Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 276U
Control Engineer

MSI"1fCT19D Bd DD vlD. (AJAR.D NO•_.___...
.INSPECTION REI`ORT
Compm.iy: YN �c.aw, �yk}�P.�-14I� Colin Ly___c50 inn _
Mira E%�.h., f�uO�r� _ Permit Number,: 8G_�
Date Inspected: �'Ju14 8 1977 Date of last inspection.: ACV. 18., 1975'___
Prod:: a: sl9 P� _ Person Contacted: ado[e, ds��°l
1. Remarks - Measures 'Taken''�
A. Erosion Contrclr /1pq.e� — o S e!
D. Waste Disposal: ,p 4� _�_...._
C. Reca amation: 4-6r
II. Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
a
RECOMMENDATIONS k
Or fi;.i_cncy letter"needed - Letter Sent /l Reinspectien Needed__

' ML_1_ _I 1T ___11_ r,____9 J___
Juduz u1 114u1'u11 k. tUl'u11[ld
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
'Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each an iversary.of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 19711t
Name of Mine Elkin Permit Number 86-3
County _Surry_ Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company Mideast Division
Mailing Address P. 0. Box 4195 Winston Salem, N. C. 27105
1. -If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
J
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
N/A
(a)
Tailings ponds
-0_
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
-0-
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
2
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
.2
Acres
TOTAL
-0-
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
Seeded.32 acres
-0-
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds -0- Acres (c) Waste Piles -0` Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine Excavation -0- Acres
(Continued on reverse side)
1

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
SeedPd 3k a r s Planted 500 white Pine seedli s.
Signature of person responsible for
Title Environmental Control Engineer
Date September 27, 1976
Complete and return to:,
Mining Division
Department of.Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh,North Carolina 27611

INSPECTED BY: {wi• rxeeS76ot5 -f z), P9Ps NO.
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: 41"Ichw /Hstle,,'A /ody"p v County: :�Z// 4
Mine: F_ /4,'. QUAAK r Permit Number: _�96 c 3
Date Inspected: 7" 3a, 1??5' Date of last inspection: =#4jEEMS
Product: & Person Contacted:o-�-�-
I. Remarks — Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control: S�'�/��
B. Waste Disposal:
C. Reclamation:
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS: e4f*Jn fI'5 APayPS)c J�: 6FRSJ
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent Reinspection Needed

IINSPECTED BY: NO,
7�l.�PR�1:�57�1)JF9
Company: County:
Mine: I Permit Number:
i
Date Inspected: W Date of last inspection:
Product: 61y"014 Person Contacted:
1, Remarks — Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control:
B, Waste Disposal: n4
97L7�67^E�1
0: eer45ra'i77--r;)4.
C. Reclamation:
RECOMMENDATIONS & C
Deficiency letter needed Letter sent Reinspection Needed

�o.f:
PAJ-j ,t -� `.jl
LAND QUALITY SECTION
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
August 6, 1985
Mr. Russ Hanes
Vulcan Materials Company
P.O. Box 4195
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Dear Mr. Hanes:
RE: ELKIN QUARRY ( NO. 86-3), SURRY COUNTY
115 QUARRY (.NO. 97-2), WILKES COUNTY
The referenced mines were reinspected for compliance with
the Mining Act of 1971 and permit conditions on July 30,
1985. This inspection found the following:
1. Elkin Quarry: No problems noted.
2. 115 Quarry: Most of the deficiencies noted last inspec-
tion have been corrected. However, an
additional rock check dam is needed in the
drainageway to a culvert behind the scale -
house.
Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated. Should
you have questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Wilbur E. Christmas
Engineering Technician
Land Quality Section
swc
pc: Jim Simons ✓
80W3 North Point Boulevard, WinstonSalern, N.C. 27106-3295 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
r
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
Division of Land Resources �y
Lard Quality Section
s G
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
0 s O
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the
permitted operation, and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining
on an area under permit, file with the Department a mining reclamation report on
a form prescribed by the Department."
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
Name of Mine ELX IN County $ueey Permit Number c2b-3
Name of Company/Owner V4LLAN MAYEEIALS CO.
Official Mailing Address O. Ba%41% W INAION-SALEM Zip Code a1U5-419S
Telephone (JA) 1(07.4600 Check if change of address or telephone
1. (a) If mine is now inactive, when did mining stop? Date
(b) Is this stoppage permanent? Yes No. -
2. List by category the total amount of new land affected by mining activities
in the 1988 calender year and locate each aiea on your updated mine map. .
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: acres. (E) PLANT AREA: acres.
(tt) STOCXPTT- S: acres.
V Check here if no new acreage affected in 1988.
3. Estimate by category the amount of new acreage to be affected by mining
activities in the 1989 calender year and locate the outline of each area on
your updated nine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: acres. (E) PLANT AREA: acres.
(Cy_ S1OCKPTT 5: acres.
V Check here if no new acreage is to be affected in 1989.
4. List by category the total amount of disturbed and unreclaimed land present
at this site at the end of the 1988 calender year.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 1:5 acres. (D) I,= EXCAVATION: 17 acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: o acres. (E) PLANT AREA: d acres.
(C) STOCKPTI,Is: to acres.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
NOTE: WASTEPILES should include overburden storage/disposal areas and berms.

5. List by category the smart of land that has been completely reclaimed in
1988 and is not subject to continued use in future mining related
activities. Briefly describe the reclamation work conducted and indicate
if you wish to have any of these areas released from your current bondi,nr3
requirements. Accurately locate the outline of all such areas on your
updated mine map.
(A) TAILING PONDS: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(B) HASTE PILES: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(C) STOCKPILES: 'acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(E) PlANr AREA acres. Explain:
Release Regves Yes No
Check here if no reclamation conducted in 1988.
Person responsible for reclamation (please print):
Signature of ca:pany officer or owrer: kmWfilL/G.=�> ,l(dLt Ll.r /j
Title: -!L 6 17P.d. a_F� /MJAZ. A /
Date:
Complete and return by PebnLary 1 two copies of this form along with two copies
of an updated mine map to: '
Land Quality Section
D-NRM
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural.Resources & Community DevelopmentE`EiV ED,
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section FEb DL 1988
A N N U A L RECLAMAT ION III O R TIAND QUALITY SECTION
North Carolina General Statutes 74-55 and the Mining Regulations require that
"The mine operator shall, by February I of each year during the life of the
permitted operation, and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining
on an area under permit, file with the Department a mining reclamation report on
a form prescribed by the Department."
Name of Mine FLw Bl County ,CiU2Qy Permit Number
Name of Company/Owner VULC.AN MA7EUNL.S C_n u.P ANY
Official Mailing Address Q,6.60x de 9ok5 IN1TeN-SALEN. Zip Code 2'1116-4\95
Telephone mg) nol-4r000 Check if change of address or telephone
1. (a) If mine is now inactive, when did mining atop? Date
(b) Is this stoppage permanent? Yes No.
2. List by category the total amount of new land affected by mining activities
in the 19B7 calender year and locate each area on your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres.
(8) WASTE PILES: acres. (E) PLANT AREA: acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: acres.
,o�'_ Check here if no new acreage affected in 1987.
3. _Estimate by category the amount of new acreage to be affected by mining
activities in the 1988 calender year and locate the outline of each area on
your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS:
acres.
(D)
MINE EXCAVATION: acres.
(8) WASTE PILES:
acres.
(E)
PLANT AREA: acres.
(C) STOCKPILES:
acres.
Check here if
no new acreage
is
to be affected in 1988.
4. List by category the total amount of disturbed and unreclaimed land present
at this site at the end of the 1987 calender year.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: L$ acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: 1— acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: f'1 acres. (E) PLANT AREA: 2 acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: 10, acres.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

5. List by category the amount of land that has been completely reclaimed in
1987 and is not subject to continued use in future mining related'
activities. Briefly describe the reclamation work conducted and indicate
if you wish to have any of these areas released from your current bonding
requirements. Accurately locate the outline of all such areas onyour
updated mine map: -
(A) TAILING PONDS: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes, No
(B) WASTE PILES: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(C) STOCKPILES: acres, Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres, Explain:
(E) PLANT AREA
Release Requested: Yes No
acres. Explain:
Yes
Check here if no reclamation conducted in 1987.
Person responsible for reclamation (please print):
Signature of company officer or owner: L 44A
Title: MINiNC, L,aD ENViRci.l b�F_NTD,L ,SprcVpu%
Date:
Complete and return by February 1 two copies of this form along with two copies
of an updated mine map to:
Land Quality Section
D-NRCD
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
FAILURE TO FILE THIS FORM BY THE DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES AND COULD E'.. ' TX1.., 11. 1 .CATION OF YOUR MINING PERMIT.

State of North Carolina /T�.'.
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development C .
Division of . Land -Resources ._. _.�...._.__'c_. JAr.......,'�.
Land Quality Section f 0
����: � 91987
ANNUAL RE C LAMAT I0N RE P O RT �(1uq'!'IC
"lui.
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or terminationof mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine ELKI14 nunR_VL< Permit Number R(e-3
Telephone (giq) 5S9- 1439
Mailing Address p,C). goy, 4195 WkNS-TOM- SAL
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds p Acres
(b) Stockpiles n Acres
(c) Waste Piles o Acres
(d) Mine.,Excavation o-- Acres ....... ... ...
TOTAL p Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. p
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
s .-
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds •.o Acres , .(c)_Weste Piles.Acres-.,,,
(b) Stockpiles o Acres (d) Mine
Excavation O Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

a
6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation Il.mir-LL.✓ IC :�.nm[�
v
Title p'�:N1Nf.NJ1 wMEN7A'SPlGA6L15T
Date 1 - S - 61
' Complete and return to:
.`land quality Section
Department of Natural Resources 8 Community Development F. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF MINING OPERATION
in the
STATE OF NORTH f_GRCT.TNA
Name of Mine- Elkin Quarry
Company- Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
Address- P. 0. Box 7506
Winston Salem, N. C. 27109
Date- March 20, 1970
Signature
4z I&
Title Office Engineer

A. Description of the Company
1. Ownership
a. Company name- Vulcan Materials Company
Mideast Division
b. Home office mailing address- P. 0. Box 7506
Winston Salem, N. C.
c. Telephone- 919 - 722-0311
d. Name and title of principal officers-
Presidcnt=---------------------------- Lewis S. Graham
Vice President Operations ------------- S. Page Graham
Vice President Sales-----! ------------ H. D. Hedrick
Controller ---------------------------- W,.N. Rumple, Jr.
(2)

e. Name and title of person authorized to represent
the company relative to registration-
E. K. Graham Office Engineer
f. Local mine name- Elkin Quarry
g. County in Which mine is located- Surry
h. Number of acres owned by operating company-
i. Number of acres leased by operating company- 125.0 +
J. Local manager- Curtis Foster
k. Local office mailing address- p 0. Box 71
Elkin, N. C. 28621
1. Telephone- 919 - 835-1439
2. Number of employees- 18
3. Ores or materials being mined- Granite
4. Mining activities -
a. Year mining originally began- 1962
b. Year mining began by present operating company- 1962
c. Estimated life of mine- 33 Yrs.
d. Total acres mined to date- 9.5
e. Number of additional acres to be mined annually- Undetermined
otherwise Zlll=lUutVC,
(3)

B. Conservation and Reclamation
1. Summary of past efforts to protect the environment, if any
a. Areas rehabilated for some use (include number of acres).
Examples include but are not limited to, land use for:
residential, commercial, & industrial sites; forest,
farming, pasture, wildlife, and recreation. Briefly
describe methods of rehabilation, such as grading, level-
ing, planting of vegetation, erosion prevention etc,

2. Summary of present and proposed conservation and land
reclamation plans and procedures, if any-
c5i

C. Maps
1. County highway map with mine location indicated. County
highway maps may be obtained from: Location Department,
State Highway Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602.
Small maps of each county are available for $0.15 each
plus 3% sales tax. bake checks payable to North Carolina
State Highway Commission.
2. Map (accurate drawing, aerial photograph or enlarged topo-
graphic map) of mine area of a scale sufficient to clearly
show the following:
a. Property lines or affected area of mining operation
b. Outline of pits
c. Outline of stockpile areas
d. Outline of overburden disposal areas
e. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be
described as to location and distance from mine if
sufficiently far removed)
f. Location and name of streams and lakes
g. Outline of settling ponds
h. Location of access roads
i. Map legend
I. Name of company
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Date prepared
7. Name of person preparing map
Signature
Title Office Engineer
(6)

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E-C L A M A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T
The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry Permit Number 86-3
County Surry Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company, Mideast Division
Mailing Address P. 0. Box 4195, Winston Salem, N.C. 27.105
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date NA
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 10 months.
(a) Tailings ponds -0_ Acres
(b) Stockpiles _0- Acres
(c) Waste Piles _0_ Acres
(d) Mine Excavation _n- Acres
TOTAL _0_ Acres
3. Estimate the new ..__eage to be fected by mining in the next 12 months. -0-
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
Routine maintenance.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds -0- Acres (c) Waste Piles -0- Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine
Excavation -0- Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title ]
Date 2-22-82 _-
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources-& Community Development
P. 0. Sox 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Lana Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C; L A M A .1 10 N R E P u R T
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry
County Surry
Permit Number 8 6-3
Telephone
919-835-1439
Name of
Company
;ulcan
Materials Company, Mideast
Division
Mailing
Address
P.O. Box
4195, Winston-Salem, N.C.
27105
1. Z` raine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining.
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 mor..ths.
(a) Tailings ponds 1/2 Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres
Date NA
(c) Waste Files _ 1/2 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 1 3/4 Aces
TOTAL 2 3/4 Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. -0-
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
NONE
5. Indicate amount, of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings Ponds
-0-
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
-- -0-
Acres
(c) Waste Piles
(d) Mine
Excavation
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
-0- Acres
-0-- Acres

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
NONE
r
Signature of person responsible for
Title Manager Environmental Eng.
Date 7- �
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

1

State of North Carolina MAY ly j9hu
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
Division of Land Resources sFCT1�N
Land quality Section LAND QUALITY
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T _
"The mine operator shall, by February 1. of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
. I Regulation No. 5E.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Fi YIN QUARRY Permit Number $(e-3
County SUREK ..Telephone C919) 835- 1439
Name of Company VULLI g - MAYER\AL5 GOMPAN`(
Mailing Address P. O. 50Y, 4-195. �. �I�INiTON-Sn.LEM , N.C. Zll\5-4\95
1. If mine is now Inactive, indicate date of termination of. mining, Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12omonths.
(a) Tailings ponds O Acres -
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles O Acres
(d) Mine Excavation. O Acres
TOTAL o Acres
3. Estimate', the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. O
4. Describe,meaeures taken for erosion control:., - -
W'U SE ERD- crq i-ONT9,01- 1PRAGTIGES INLLJO Nea BUY NOT LIMITED
To' - Yu 05E STATED- %IN T14E - AANDROOK C)UIQE FOR SEOIMflN-r
-O$TAIN EO-
FROM"THE-'NO2TH
GARO
LINA D1=PAtt-T MENT 'OF
'-t`1 AYU At.:"' RECbuRCES
-P:N o".
CrOMr•r.V
N�ITK � DEVELOPMENT. '
31 Indicate amountof
reclamation carried
out'in.'last:l2-months.
. (a) Te111ngs.Ponds
0
Acres
(c),. Waste. Piles O Acres
(b) Stockpiles
o..;.,
Acres
(d) Mine
,.
Excavation O Acres
-
.(CONTINUED
ON REVERSE
SIDE)
._S ., .u.., l i.. 5
�. ..., .. ...,..
,.. ..
K. n .,.a -... .. ...

z
6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months. - _

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry Permit Number 86-3
County Surry Telephone
919-835-1439
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company, Mideast Division
Mailing Address P . 0. Box 4195, Wins ton- Salem_,__ N.C. 27105
1. If mine -is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date NA
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 3�G_ Acres
ell% Q+-oc?-49 13 Arrag
(c) Waste Piles - 0- Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 1 Acres
TOTAL 3 ! Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. -Q-
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
None
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds -0- Acres (c) Waste Piles -0- Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine
Excavation -0- Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Nnn P
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Environmental Control Eng.
Date 1.-28-80
Complete and return to:
Land,Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

StAtA of Nnrth rnrnijnn
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation'No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry - _ Permit Number 86-3
County Surry Telephone
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company
Mailing Address P, 0. Box 4195, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
919/835-1439
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date NA
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
-0-
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
-0-
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
-0-
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
.25
Acres
TOTAL
.25
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
None
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds
(b) Stockpiles
Acres
-0- Acres
(c) Waste Piles -0-
(d) Mine
Excavation -0-
28
Acres
Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
None
Signature of person responsible for reclamation // Yfd�GQ�C/
Title Environmental Controls
Date January 30, 1979
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Sox 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
RECEIVED
FEB 0 5 f97g
O1V,D kA,iih
�.:1'QpALITy SSG L'NCFS
FCTZ

I� is
State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
'Division of Land Resources MAR 3 1978
Land Quality Section
DIY. OF EAY.LM RESOURCES
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I D N R E P O R T LAND QUALITY SECTION
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5E.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine ��(„K /iiv Permit Number
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date n
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
- (a) Tailings ponds _ 0_ Acres
(b) Stockpiles _ n - Acres
(c) Waste Piles - 0- Acres -
(d) Mine Excavation -O - Acres
TOTAL Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. - (�-
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds Acres (c) Waste Piles " U - Acres
(b) Stockpiles Acres (d) Mine
Excavation --- Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for
Date ra-a-9-r1
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27667
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

State of North Carolina (. �.�� 5 to✓o
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section �,�1C Q;;auy S;.CTION
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T 1 0 N R E P O R T
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin quarry Permit Number 86-3
County Surry Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Vulcan Materials company
Mailing Address P. O. Box 4195, Winston-Salem NC 27105
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres WE PLAN TO EXPANDEXISTING N3 SEDIMENT
(c) Waste Piles, ..n: Acres
BASIN BY 1 ACRE
(d) Mine Excavation 0 Acres
TOTAL Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 0
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
We use State of Art Erasion Control oractirec including Ent not limited tc hadremea:,...
straw mulching, straw bale barriers, silt fences, and the use of crushed stone as
erosion control materials.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine
Excavation 0 Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Environmental COmpl. Coord
Date San. 23, 1985
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources S Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

�n-Lr-L(a5
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of
the permitted operation, and within 30 days of completion or termination
of mining on an area under permit, file with the Department a mining
reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry Permit No. 86-3
County Surry Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company
Mailing Address P. 0. Sox 71, Elkin, N. C. 28621
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining.
Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles n Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation �_0 Acres
TOTAL 2.0 Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12
months. 10
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
-'including, but not limited to, hydroseeding..,-Straw mulching, straw
bale barriers, silt fence, and use of crushed srone'as erosion control
materials.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

S.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine 0 Acres
Excavation
6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Kim
Signature F freclamation
U1 person -responsible, " v�
Title i�_,_VX
Date 2 ��
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources S Community Development 2L�
Division of Land Resources 35
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a farm prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Elkin Quarry Permit Number 86-3
County Surry Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Vulcan Materials Company
Mailing Address P. 0. Box 71, Elkin, N.C. 28621
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date _
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds -n- Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres
(c) Waste Piles _0_ Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 1.5 Acres
TOTAL 1.5 Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. -0- _
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
3 acres sowed on east of the quarry with low maintenance mix.
Routine Ditch and Sediment Pond Maintananra
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds -0- Acres (c) Waste Piles -0- Acres
(b) Stockpiles -0- Acres (d) Mine
Excavation -0- Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Mideast Division
Date January 10, 1983
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

m
z
vY
_ rf t r►3 t�

DIVISION OF
Ow North Carolina Dep arTment oT IVaTural I ANp RFS(�l1R�FS
Resources &Community Development Stephen G. Conrad, Director
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsley, Secretary Telephone [phone]
September 28, 1982
Mr. Russ Hanes
Vulcan Materials Ccmpany
P. 0. Box 4195
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
RE: Tllcin-Quarry,, Permit #86-3, Surry County
iJorhh Qiiarry; Permit. #34-2, Forsyth County
Piedmont Quarry,,Permit #34-3, Forsyth County
Shelton Quarry, Permit #17-1, Caswell County
Sinith Grove Quarry, Permit #30-3, Davie County
Stokesdale Quarry, Permit #41-8, Guilford County
115 Quarry, Permit #97-2, Wilkes County
158 Sand Pit, Pernu-t #30-2, Davie County
Dear Mr. Hanes:
Your applications for renewal of the above referenced permits
have been approved. Copies of the renewed permits are enclosed.
The conditions in the permit renewals were based primarily upon:
the initial applications. Modifications were made as indicated by the
renewal requests and as required to insure ompliance with The Mining
Act of 1971.
Please review the renewed permits and advise this office should
you have any questions concerning them.
' ncerelyr,,
�es,D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
i.
Mining -Specialist
T.M NOTIAT.T`Py gFYTTCN
cc: Doug Miller
4
Geological Survey Section-733-2423; Geodetic g2ction-733-3836; Land Quality Section-733.4574; Planning and Inventory Section-733.3833:
land Rcaources Information Service•733.2090 r Box 27687 Ra4eioh 27611-7687 J 4

",X

`
x
sr5
`4.
x
ter:
�f
ss
rtr'
v
a
+
a
.4
r.
i
4rr�
4
kafk
4
i
.. -.
Ssk(:w K`3' Ui�`z
j(y
wu
DAI_ PRE-AKVv
. .p.r

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ate 1925
To:
From:
Remarks:
❑
Note and
file
❑
Note and
return to me
❑
Note and
see me about this
❑
For your
approvai
❑
Per our
conversation
❑
Per your
request
more
,r
2VS
1I nk*l
❑ Note, Initial and forward
❑ Your comments, please
❑ For your information
❑ Prepare reply for my tipnature
❑ Prepare Information for me to reply
❑ Please answer, with copy to me
[) To be filed

IMPORTANT
To
Date
M
_
Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
of
Phone
AREA CODE
NUMBER EXTENSION
Message
Signed
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU
'
URGENT
I_RETURNED YOUR CALL
N. C. Dept, of Natural Resources and Community Development

+ Cov, Te C1{MA"s 64AVAIIA
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE 6 RICE b &
NIKKEI ATTORNEYS AT LAW
DONALD oIC .
NHAHDRMW[PCYPRUS
VII
P.
vC e[wP
D. PLAYER
WILLuw E. MATTHEWS, aw,wOF
MPICHAEL N,E P.N.
COUNSEL
N-SALVE OFFICE
RALEION OrAICE
301 NORTH MAIN STREET
2700P
MAILINHO AULDRESS
FAILING ADDRESS
WHINSICI
RATES"
TELEPHONE TELEPHONE
I w• WRS TELEPHONE [phone]'9
March 22, 1983
RECEIVED
Mr. Robert Helms, Director
Division of Environmental Management %W 2g ]9B3
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Archdale Building �Ng QUALITY SECTION
512 North Salisbury street --
Raleigh, N.C. 27611„--
Re: Vulcan Materials Company
Dear Mr. Helms:
Thank you for giving me the chance to meet with you and Mr. Lee
Fleming last week to discuss the outcome of the Stoneville Quarry
case and the Company's concern about adverse effects on other
quarries.
Enclosed for your information is a copy of a recent confiden-
tial intracompany memo regarding the Company's Elkin Quarry. The
Company very much appreciates your policy of notifying the Company
of anv comolaints. We reauest that you be particularly aware of
what may be an effort to stir up a lawsuit at the Elkin Quarry and
let us know if your state or regional offices are contacted by Mr.
Chappel or anyone else concerning that quarry.
Thanking you again for your interest and concern, I am
ELD:rhp
Enclosure ✓
cc: Mr. Lee Fleming
Mr. William J. Grayson
Yours sincerely,
/ �� GCGevA�`T�Ere. � O" -�
E. Lawrence Davis
tom.

dean Materials Company V
CONFIDENTIAL
To: File
FROM: Jerry L. Simmons DATE: Mar, 7, 1983
SUBJECT: Carl Chappel vs. Vulcan Materials Co.
In 1964, a suit against Vulcan Materials Company for
blasting, vibration, dust, noise, etc., was filed by
Carl Chappel who lives approximately one-half mile east
of our Elkin Quarry.
Curtis Foster called me on Friday, March 4th, to advise
that Mr. Bob Parks who. lives on CC Camp Road and who is
a neighbor of Elkin Quarry, informed him that Mr. Chappel
was going around the community, suggesting how the quarry
is devaluating their property and informed them of our
Stoneville lawsuit settlement which be apparently picked
up from the newspaper.
We understand that Mr. Chappel had made an appointment to
meet with Bud Combs, another quarry neighbor, to discuss
the devaluation of property but the meeting never came off
because Mr. Combs did not show up.
I also understand that there is another neighbor, Mr.
Williams, who lives between the quarry and Mr. Chappel
who agrees with Mr. Chappel.
Curtis Foster will keep me informed if there are any new
developments.
is fSrimmons
Manager, Administration
JLS:mlr
Copies: W. J. Grayson
S. P. Graham
W. E. Ayers
K. R. Carlson
�I