Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210811_ADI_letter_74-96ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary BRIAN WRENN Director Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 7019 1120 0002 0065 1306 Brent Wood FSC II, LLC 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 101 Raleigh, NC 27607 RE: Harris Pit Mining Permit No. 74-9E Pitt County Tar -Pamlico River Basin Dear Mr. Wood: NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality August 11, 2021 We have reviewed the transfer request your company submitted for the referenced mine site. In order for this office to complete its review of the referenced project in accordance with G.S. §74-50 and §74-51 of the Mining Act of 1971, please provide the additional or revised information in accordance with the following comments: 1. Please provide a current mine map that reflects current site conditions. The mine map must include the items listed in section B.2 of the mining permit application. 2. Please maintain Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) measures as noted in the mine inspection report. Please clearly mark the mine permit boundaries as specified in Condition 5 of the mining permit. All affected area boundaries (30.22 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site on 100-foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals. 4. Please provide an estimated life of the mine on pg. 3 or pg. 14 of the mine permit application. This value is used to determine the inflation factor on the bond reclamation worksheet. Your current permit does not allow dewatering. Please cease dewatering immediately. If you would like to continue to dewater you must submit a modification application along with a modification fee of $650.00. ($750.00 Modification fee less $100.00 already submitted transfer fee.) 6. Please clarify how sediment will be maintained when mining through the ditch in the in the middle of the property that runs from the northwest to the southeast and terminates on Seville rd. Please note, this office may request additional information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review progresses. Be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed above have been fully addressed. D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1612 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 NORhI CAROLINA - oaPermemoieomronmenmiuuaiity /`� 919.707.9200 Certified Mail Mr. Wood Page 2 In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my attention at the following address: Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Department of Environmental Quality 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 As required by 15A NCAC 513.0113, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files at the end of the 180-day period. Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner. Please contact me at (919) 707-9220 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Adam Parr, PE Assistant State Mining Engineer Enclosures cc: Mr. Samir Dumpor, PE Ms. Kelly Proctor 5676 Thompson Chapel Church Rd. Wilson, NC 27896 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources MINE INSPECTION REPORT ® PERMITTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE 1. MINE NAME: Harris Pit 2. MINE LOCATION: 35.670425,-77.427936 3. COUNTY: Pitt 4. RIVER BASIN: Tar -Pamlico 5. CASE: 6. OPERATOR: Kelly Proctor, PLT Construction Company 7. ADDRESS: 8. MINING PERMIT #: 74-96 ❑ N/A 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: ® N/A 10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: N/A 11. PICTURES? ® Yes ❑ No TAKEN BY: Randall Jones 12. TYPE OF INSPECTION: ❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites) 1. Size of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map) 2. How was this area measured? Measured by: ® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites) C. Follow-up Inspection 13. Date of last inspection: Summer 2019 14. Any mining since that date? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: They have mined from the back going north towards the ditch in the middle of the property, now they are moving west. 15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: The contracting crew were starting to pile up earth towards the west corner of the site. 16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? U Yes IZI No U N/A If no, explain: They were using a dewatering system that was not on the mine map and had not yet been approved. A large sediment trap had been built since the previous inspection with a new pum //pipe configuration and a portable generator. 17. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, explain: 18. Is there any off -site damage? A. I I Yes B. L If A, describe the type and severity of the damage: No C. IXI None observed If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? ® Yes ❑ No Explain: They have a small check dam with simple rip rap tryin to and emergency overflow, if it fails it will run straight into the blue line stream. The rock check dam is right on the 50 ft border of the buffer. 19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: Modify the permit to allow these activities before permit transfer, or other measures as directed by Raleigh. 20. Other recommendations and comments: They need to mark their digging boundary as outlined in their permit, no markers were noticed during inspection, but they were at least stayingon n the property. 21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ® N/A 22. Follow-up inspection needed? ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date 10/06/2021 23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator Yes INSPECTED BY: J. Randall Jones, Jr, PE DATE 08/06/2021 Telephone No: 252-946-6481 Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist Rev.10/2015