65-01_2_Redacted

C!5: D I
,A=EQ$
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality

DIAMOND SHAMROCK
�,oP or nE04 unnr ON RA'UP VIA
SCES OF WLLAY
r T
,+ — —
`1-`=1�. 1� rL00D STORAGE ZONE r15WAADO
I0�I OM____--__ -_-_--_I_S.009F
31 SEOIMCMT sIDI xoxgTOTAL Dnsm CAPACITY)
------4'win
—.q:il''.;•1'
=III 15,
Ius. scmuurt DIP"' 31i11
Ii Ui s ,_ I_ tlJ1 'nip -RAP
M�-----12�min. u'N•
�ZMAXJM4GAIN WACO iM 3DLEEV'[L 19 n ACAEO CLEANSECTION THRU BASIN B FILTER. NO SCALE
P
51OL5 01 CPILLWAY'
�� u F ¢GGwG '
7— EimMAv
°I 7r`-
LAl
m_1 II ,l=In--
,y
71 APPI
SC CTION THRU. BERra B FILTCR
NO SCALE
S DI r It Ii I-r ('ff; s,
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
NO SCALE
IDEAL CEMENT PLANT
3oi
Or
N• E. CAPE FEAR RIVER
P • 4
ACTIVE PIT
POND 1
,. 0
RECEIVED
APR z t) WIJ
UNO QIIAUTY SECTION
Aye�IrjErl'r -TFza�s WILL 6L� G
I N �v L-L- � l� Li �4 IZ.4I L21 O Q --r0 r`-A I N I IJ I
L` O o; )-�Cti YL
I�G,D�O�E E.I 6 '-1G.--TL,j �i
WILL-- C- dU.'�T M1.iJ6p IN Ti-jE
Ammended Mine Map
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
_ - astle Hayne Quarry 65-1
Scale: 1" :: 500' Drawn By:
DATE: APRIL 23, 1990 Carole Cameron, ASLA
" a�)j boy, \I loS-_ G
1

K
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Govemor
1MIIlam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 21, 1990
Ms. Carole Cameron, ASLA, APA
Landscape Specialist, Environmental Services
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
RE: Modification Request to Mine 515 Acres
Castle Hayne Quarry
Mining Permit No. 65-01
New Hanover County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
Chirles H. Gardner
Director
The initial review has been comple`�'ed on the above referenced request. A
copy of said request was forwarded to the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) for their review and comment. NCWRC has noted that the
proposed 515 acre mine area is located adjacent to the existing mine and is
"composed of pine/oak uplands and pocosin/bay wetlands." Ire light of the above,
NCWRC has requested that several items be addressed before they can concur with
the proposed modification request. I have attached a copy of NCWRC's memorandum
to me dated May 25, 1990 outlining these items. This office agrees that each
item must be addressed before the mining permit can be modified with the
exception of item no. 3 - Resource Inventory. A general survey of the site for
only rare, threatened or endangered species will satisfy this office's concern
in this area.
In addition to the above, this office is also concerned over the potential
for sinkhole collapse on and adjacent to the site. This area of concern must be
addressed by your company. Furthermore, after the wetlands and their
corresponding buffer zones have been delineated on the mine map, the approximate
phases of mining and their respective erosion control measures must also be
delineated on the mine map.. If no Corps of Engineers (COE) approval has been
granted to mine said wetlands then the above phases must be outside said
wetlands. On the contrary, if the COE has approved mining through the wetlands,
please forward a copy of the approval to this office to support your intentions.
Please be advised that should'your mining permit be modified to include the
above, it can be modified at any time that the proposed phases, COE approval,
etc. change from your original, approved request.
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
Are Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
f/

•.
Y
Ms. Carole Cameron
June 21, 1990
Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving
two (2) copies of the requested information in the near future in order to
continue our review of your request. Should you have any questions on the
above, please advise at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tracy Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/se
Attachment: May 25, 1990 NCWRC memo
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, P.E., Wilmington Regional Engineer,-LQS
Mr. Horace Willson, Martin Marietta Aggregates
Mr. Richard Hamilton, Assistant Director, NCWRC

® North Carolina Wildhfe Resources Commission
512 N. SahsburV Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919.733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive. Director REGENEI)
MR, 2y 1990
U(ao nunun sEc1+aN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tracy Davis, Mining Specialist
d Qu 1.ty Section, DEH&NR
FROM: Richard B Hamilton
Assistant Director
DATE: May 25, 1990
SUBJECT: Mining permit application for Martin Marietta,
Castle Hayne Quarry, New Hanover County, North
Carolina.
The Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) has reviewed
the subject permit application and professional biologists
on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project
area. An onsite investigation was conducted on May 21, 1990
for the purpose of assessing impacts to wildlife and
fisheries resources. We are submitting this correspondence
in response to your memorandum of April 26, 1990.
The applicant, Martin Marietta, Castle Bayne Quarry, is
requesting a modification to their mining permit to add a
515 acre tract. The proposed mining area is located
adjacent to the existing mine and is.composed of pine/oak
uplands and pocosin/hay wetlands. Interspersion of these
forest types results in high quality wildlife habitat.
Major wildlife species which may occur in the area include
white-tailed deer, black bear, grey fox, grey squirrel,
bobcat, beaver, mink, otter, muskrat, raccoon, opossum,
songbirds, waterfowl, woodpeckers, raptors and various
reptiles and amphibians. The pond system may also be home
to several fish species which may include bluegill, redfin
pickerel, yellow perch and redbreast sunfish.

Overall, large scale development projects, such as
mines result in significant degradation of our wildlife
resources. However, we were unable to evaluate the total
impact from the castle Hayne mining proposal due to
deficiencies in the information contained in the permit
application. The areas where additional information is
needed includes:
1. Wetlands ---There are large acreages of wetlands
present on the property to be mined. There is no
indication on the application that appropriate
coordination with state and federal agencies having
jurisdiction over wetland resources has occurred.
Total acreages of wetlands impacted should be
calculated. wetlands provide valuable wildlife
habitat as well as critical water quality buffering
functions. Because of this important environmental
function, the WRC believes it would be in the
best interest of the applicant to establish a
buffer zone around all wetland areas.
2. Reclamation Plan ---What are the future plans for
property once the mining is completed? No plans
were included with the application. Mitigation for
all wetlands impacted should be included in this
plan.
3. Resource Inventory ---A complete inventory of plant
and animal communities, including rare, threatened
or endangered species should be prepared.
Potential adverse impacts as a result of the proposed
project include degradation of water quality, loss of
wetlands and loss of fish and wildlife habitats. Permanent
losses of habitat important to a broad range of fish and
wildlife species cannot be viewed favorably by the Wildlife
Resources Commission. The loss of wetland resources of this
magnitude must be coordinated with regulatory agencies.
Therefore, before the WRC can concur with approval of a
mining permit, all concerns must be addressed
satisfactorily.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on
this permit application. If we can provide further
assistance or recommendations, please call on us.
RBH/lp
cc: The Honorable R.G. Sowers III
Mr. Bobby Maddrey
Mr. Bennett Wynne

. r
IR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
uNn ()I ALi[Y SECTION
July 16, 1990
F043RANDUM
TO: Tracy Davis
'I1 is Bob Cheek Q +3 L
FRAM: Rick Shiver S
SUBJ=: Review and Comment
Request for Modification
Mining Permit No. 65-01
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne Quarry
New Hanover County
As requested, I have reviewed the subject request for modification, and since
the packet contained only a map entitled "Amended Mine Map", and none of the basis
for the request were included in the packet, this review assumes the following:
1. This request involves a request to,operate the expansion areas as a
dewatered quarry;
2. The permittee requests to dewater the expansion area to a depth of about
80 to 100 feet below land surface;
3. The permittee holds a valid NPDES permit to dispose of the wastewater
generated as a result of dewatering the expansion area.
The comments that I have to offer for your consideration are as follow:
1. Occidental Chemical (formerly Diamond Shamrock) owns and operates a plant
to the north of the expansion area. At this plant, OxyChem manufactures
solid and liquid chromium chemicals. From 1971 to 1975, liquid chromic
acid and sodium bichromate leaked from a underground sump into the
subsurface. Since 1975, OxyChem has recovered chromium -contaminated
groundwater from both the unconfined and confined aquifer underneath its
plant -site, and thus far has been successful in preventing these
contaminant plumes from moving off its property boundaries. It is my
opinion that, if this request for modification is granted, that the
contaminant plume in the confined aquifer will migrate toward and enter
the dewatered quarry. There is insufficient information to determine if
the contaminant plume in the unconfined aquifer will migrate toward and
enter the quarry, but it is a possibility. If the plume(s) migrate
off -site in response to quarry dewatering, and chromium -contaminated
groundwater enters the quarry, it also is possible that this will result
in violations of the conditions specified in the permittee's NPDES permit.

2. It is also likely that quarry dewatering in the expansion area will
adversely impact the water supply wells that OxyChem uses to provide
its source of process water. As well, it is anticipated that quarry
dewatering will impact the one or two water supply wells that are known to
be located south of SR1002.
3. As well, there exists a high probability that quarry dewatering will
induce sinkhole collapse within an estimated distance of 3000 feet of the
active area of quarry dewatering. It is likely that sinkhole collapse
will adversely impact the industrial operations at OxyChem, and may pose a
public safety threat to the folks who work there.
In conclusion, it is recommended that you consider the following suggestions
concerning this request for modification:
1. Inform OxyChem that the permittee has requested a modification to mine
proximal to OxyChem;
2. Ask the Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental Management
to review this request for modification, given the likelihood that
issuance of this request could result in the seepage of
chromium -contaminated groundwater into the quarry, in turn which would
generate a chromium wastewater that is not authorized for disposal by its
present NPDFS permit;
3. Ask NC DOT to review the request to determine impacts on SR1002;
4. Require the permittee to demonstrate to the permitting agency that the
issuance of this request will not result in the migration of the chromium
plume(s) into the dewatered mine; that dewatering will not adversely
impact the process wells at OxyChem; that dewatering will not adversely
impact the water supply wells that are located south of SR1002; that
dewatering will not result in sinkhole collapse at OxyChem and in and
around the entrance road to the quarry and OxyChem, and in and south of
SR1002.
It is hoped that you find these comments useful. I believe that it is
premature to discuss the location of any groundwater monitoring stations, pending
your consideration of these comments. In many respects, I believe that the issuance
of this request will result in more impacts than we expect to occur around the other
nearby quarries for which I have completed reviews. While OxyChem already is in
violation of the Classification and Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters in
North Carolina (15A NCAC 2L), we are operating under the terms of a Special Order by
Consent (SOC). It is likely that the operation of the dewatered quarry will
result in worse violations of 2L, thus complicating OxyChem's ability to comply with
the standards and its SOC.
As always, if you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919)
256-4161.
APH/RSS/lfc
cc: David Adkins
Bob Jamieson
Dan Sams
Central Files
GWS WiRO

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone Log
Dme:J�� Sheet of
Time: ty .
❑ pm
2. Conversation
3. Affiliation:
4. Content of
Call: Placed ❑ Received ❑
Rctumed X
L
roY,

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Mr. Rick Shiver
Water Management Section'
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28304
Subject: Observation Wells
Dear Mr. Shiver:
SOUTHEAST DIVISION
P O. HOX 30013
MEIOH. NONTH CMOLINA 270I2
TELEPHOIEM10T01-A550
August 20, 1980
In accordance with our telephone conversation of August 11,
we are sending you the following information on the seven
observation wells recently constructed at Castle Hayne.
(1) Location map showing all observation wells
(2) Well logs including depth of casing, etc.
(3) Well elevations
(4) Casing - 1/4" heavy duty PVC black pipe
The observation wells were completed in late May. We are,
therefore, very anxious to begin a water monitoring program
before more time has elapsed. Mr. Edwin Floyd has been advised
to contact you regarding the two observation wells you propose
to monitor with your equipment.
We trust that the attached information is adequate for your needs
at this time. A visit to the well locations would be beneficial.
Please let me know when you will be able to make a visit and if
you have any questions regarding any portion of the monitoring
program.
Sincerely yours,
yyouurram/s �,
Horace S. Willson
Senior Environmental Engineer
HSW/oa
Attachment
cc: R. W. Edwards

j.. .ii. �- . jW •. Y.�.fi': .. '4j:� . �!`_ �.{ -.. •r.. '.:7.-j.n-•. .�'^7. ^� tvl 1 .i �jv .
nterof f ice Memo
SOUTHEAST DIVISION
WELL ELEVATIONS
•tune 10, 1980
CASTLE RAYNE QUARRY - OBSERVATION WELLS
Well #1 -- 80 Drilled: 5/20/80
Ground Elev.: 22.8'
Eluv. Top of Casing: 24.8'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: - 0.2' �rq
2
0 - 23' Snndy Clay
23 - 28' hard Sandy Marl
28 - 32' ]lard Limestone
32 - 33' Soft Limestone
33 - 43' Hard Limestone
43 - 48' Hard Limestone w/Sandstone & Sand Seams
48 - 53' Sand & Sandstone
Well #2 - 80 Drilled: 5/21/80
Ground Elev.: 13.5'
Elev. 'Top of Casing: 16.5'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: - 8.1'
Z5.0 G'►
0 - 22' Sandy Clay
22 - 38' hard limestone
38 _ 48' Sand w/Sandstone Seams
Well #3 - 80 Drilled: 5/22/80
Ground Elev.: 28.5'
Elev. Top of Casing: 31.5'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: +7.5'
o''�
0." 23` Sandy Clay
23 - 51' Marl
51 - 53' hard Limestone

Castle Hayne Quarry Papa
Observation Wells
June 10. 1980
Well P4 - 80 Drilled: 5122/80
Ground Elev.: 9.5'
Elev. Top of Casing: 10.5'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: -9.5'
20,0� ('d'uug
0 - 19' Sandy Clay
19:- 23' Hard Limestone
23 - 28' Clay
28 - 38' Hard Limestone
38 - 44' Hard Limestone w/Soft Seams
44 - 48' Sand '
Well 05 - 80 Drilled: 5/23/80
Ground Elev.: 28.4'
Elev. Top of Casing: 30.4'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: +44'
0 - 24' Sandy Clay o
24 - 51' Marl
51 - 53' hard Limestone
53 - 58' Sand
Well #6 - 80 Drilled: 5127180
Ground Elev.: 10.5'
Elev. Top of Casing: 12.5'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: - 1.5'
.0 - 12' Sandy Clay
12 - 38' Hard Limestone w/Sand Seams
38 - 43' Sandstone w/Sand Seams
43 - 48' Sand
Well S7 - 80 Drilled: 5/28/80
Ground Elev. 27.2'
Elev. Top of Casing: 30.2'
Elev. Bottom of Casing: +3.2'
0 - 24' Sandy Clay
24 - 40' Marl
40 - 43' Hard Limestone
43 - 48' Hard Llmest:opp w/$Hprl Seams

February 16, 1981
MEMOPANni]M
TO: File
F". Jim Simons
SUBJECT: Castle Hayne Quarry, Groundwater Infoimation
I called flick Shriver, groundwater specialist with DEM, Wilming-ton
about the groundwater situation at the Castle Hayne Quarry.
Shriver stated that they did not believe that the metallic sludge
being deposited in the old pit from Diamond Shamrock "sump pump was toxic.
Diamond Shamrock is completing a study to document this. Bill Strictland,
Human Resources will review the study.
Approximately one million gal/day is pumped from the quarry sump
pump. The amount increases during rainfall. The DRI groundwater section
conducted a study,of the affects of dewatering and found that dewatering
was causing significant drawdown, Martin Marietta has replaced or
deepened at least 20 wells.
Shriver cautioned that the proposed quarry expansion will likely
cause additional drawndown in the populated area along SR 1318 and could
cause additional subsidence or sank holes within 3000 feet of the quarry
excavation. Additional observation wells are recariended.
JDS pg
cc: Terry Kraynak

SHE ET._Lof! PERSONNEL:_X%,([4z4ct Pi %y�m. HOLE NO.�it
PROPERTY OWNER: %/%�%lQ n DATE: i, -e7.8U
LOCATION �`�. ,. rC✓i COUNTY STATE
TYPE OF MATERIAL
LOG
DEPTH
IN FEET
REMARKS
0_
I
- 2
- 3T
- 4
5
- 7=.
8
- 9-
�0
I
N�
os w47EK 2
�j�"�/
C�5
4
5
— 6—
7
loon
--
—
kC
- 9-
- 2-
—
-- --
— -
- 4-
5-
6
- 7
--
_- 9-
0
- I
- 2
--
-
4
- 5-
6
- 7-
aN� wiT�_ one
0
- 2
EP
y
- 5-
- 6
- 7-
=
- .9
0
- I
- 2
- 3
- 4-
5
- 6=
7=
8-
do
--
—
-
—

SHrETLof— PERSONNEL: r�iW' HOLE NO. WE1-Z'kA'-8c
PROPERTY OWNER. 11711I12. DATE', S 20• So
LOCATION �fsr'-C/Se01cAL COUNTY /V:, didcar, STATEAC,
TYPE OF MATERIAL
LOG
INPTH
FEET
REMARKS
-
9N0
ND
- 2-
- 3
4-
5-
- 6-
7-
8=
9=
�0
- 2=
- 3=
4-
- 5-
6-
7-
- 8-
9-
20 -
2—
F
- z • .. p eu.va
—25' TpTgL
—
—
-
--
--
-- -
--
--------- -- —
9yC0
/010
_ 4_
- 5
04
- I -
-
Sof/ Rock 3 =3
4--
5-
6-
7 7—
2-
•S•
2j °-
4-
s swc y s€A s
2-
1
5-
7-
9v
-
-

SIlEET / of! PERSONNEL 1��l6ft�� fG//.o�,.�/ HOLE N0. wE« 5E
PROPERTY OWNER. DATE. S- 23' I?D
LOCATION COUNTY IZIa�d STATE 14ZIC
TYPE OF MATERIAL
roc
DEPTH IN FEET
T REMARKS
-_ 0
I —
2-
3_
4
5
- 6-
- 7-
e
�Q
- 2-
- 3
= q
- 5-
- 6-
- 7
9-
e'0
1-
- 2-
- 3-
ssia�
-
—
--
— -
-
5
7-
—
I
- 2-
5
- 6
- 7-
--
-
9
- 2
o�
6
- 7-
0--�'�o.P6'.
2
Aa >c
A n
- 5
- 6-
- 7-
—
S--Nopn
-

SHEET / of! PERSONNEL: � 2" lam4oza2 HOLE NO.
PROPERTY OWNER:DATE'. 6'22- 80
LOCATION COUNTY /Zz2ee0ty STATE 42C•
TYPE OF MATERIAL
roc
oEFE
E
IN FEET
REMARKS
— D
I-
_ 3-
4-
5-
- 6
- I-
- 2-
- 3
- 5-
- 6-
7-
-
9' rAs.�9 ini
— -
°!E
20
- 2
LAc C CLA
- - -
S
- 4
- 5-
7
1 �Colc
-
0
-
- 2_._
— Lo T wATt
4'
_- 5-
6-
- 7-
4 ee -ef
----
N'./ soft
6
_¢0_
3
4-
- 5-
- 6-
7-
SEAmq,Ca
-
-
9-
-0
- 2-
- 3-
- 4 -
- 5
- 7-
g=
- 6b
---- - -- -
-
-
. -- —

SHEET4of2L PERSONNEL le�C �e ZCa' ,aZ HOLE NO !emu» s"bO
PROPERTY OWNER. w-z7A DATE: 5--��2.740
LOCATION COUNTY Af 6d J�/STATE .
TYPE OF MATERIAL
LOG
DEPTH
IN FEET
REMARKS
SA
--o
-
a
I
- 2-
3-
- 4-
5-
- 6-
- 7-
= 8=
- 9-
-i0
--
- 4-
- 5-
- 6
7
9 -
zo
2 --
- -
C.QriN
24 ._-TTgc
—
—
--
--- — — --
- - -- -- - — .
4-
- 5-01
- 7-
--
— —
—
I-
7--
--
--
9-
2-
5
- 6._
- 7 -.:
,
p6
9-
O
- -
-- -
A 1•S.
- 4-
6-
- 7-
= 8-
0
6-

SHEETJ-oi! PERSONNEL aaJ aa6i�) HOLE N0.�-ZZ,
PROPERTY OWNER. m XV4 IDATE' = %5-21 40
LOCATION tfmal e2 m,....X COUNTY A/W eneaGc. STATE 1 C
TYPE OF MATERIAL
LOG
DEPT"
IN FEET
REMARKS
9N
-7
0
= 2-
= 3
- 4-
5-
- 6-
= 7--
- 8
i0
- I
_ 2-
- 3-
- 4
= 5-
7
_ B
9--
zo
-
CL Qy
- 22'C,ptiN nl ,P
- C(1S/QL A4e v6 (fC rwi0
_—�• 7ota<�
--
-
—
-
-
--
L
5
= 6-
= 7-
n ----
cvCt )
R eq L3S
--- — ----
9
- 2
----- — --
—Lest
6-
7-
9-
0
--- 32
- 4
5
= 6--
- 7 -_
FP7
S2,
o S[7Alp�YbAUS
-
=
0
2-
- 3-
- 4--
- 5-
= 7-
8
9-
-
-
--
—
-

SHEET! of PERSONNEL: a e?a®� HOLE N0.WCIZ 7-
PROPERTY OWNER.
�J DATE' 28 80
LOCATION x" V6AV y�v'oj U C 0 U N T Y XL liol,i,vcr STATE 46t
TYPE OF MATERIAL
hoc
N DEPTH
1N FEET
REMARKS
S N
0-
2
3
- 4
5-
6
7=
8
- 9
/0
I
2
3
4
- 5
- 6-
7
- 8-
0
- I-
- 2
- 3
��9
/Lsatt6��1 m
3' " ABoy6
T- -
-
-
—
--
— --
--
6
- 7-
—
1 u'
9--
I
-
tp
5-
6
-7
3 op
—
4„
9 -
- 0
— 2
eE
of
E
- r,
6-
7
c�
-
-
-
-
0
I
- 2
3
- 4-
- 5 _
- 6-
7
8
--

N.C. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH ,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
� P.O.. Box 27687
% Raleigh, N.C. 27611
FAX: [phone]
TELECOPY TO:
FAX
q 11
NO. OFF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
WhQTIENTS:
9�9 ?03
4231clo

UnJ QaWuy Swoon
Memo
Date: ��y(lqv Time:
To: 04-6am. ,% .`. asp8 Ig i
i
From:
Re:,debwAl tg*V&7rA- k6bn r�S
GDS4tri AAgpfi &4 AGb%IGLrMt4✓ Rr`3.u.df
C jtp'p o-IU+.� SIS ALA i>)
Diviaim of L aem s, Nmh Qmlina D pv cnt of I:nvimn 4l hh, and Na M anmus

64 e�e:_� Q
Ctf6-
-7(?,6Op

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
April 8, 1991
Mr. Tracy E. Davis E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Department of Environmental Health
and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Castle Hayne Quarry
Dear Mr. Davis:
P 0. a 30013
MUCH, N.C. 27522A013
TELEPHONE [phone]
RFcellVOj?j
40
IANo 911411rySE9yoN
Presently Castle Hayne is operating under two mining permits, #65-1 and #65-3 (Ideal). At this time
we would like to request that these permits be combined by transferring #65-3 to #65-1. Attached
is a check to cover this modification.
We would also like to clarify our plans for the 515 acre tract which we applied for a permit last year.
At the present time we have no plans to mine this area. It will be identified on our map as "owned
but not permitted."
Thank you for your help in this matter
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC/oe
Attachment
cc: H.
S. Willson
W.
T. Sellers
C.
A. Weaks
M.
]ones
B.
Barnhardt

a�x
�P 44 ^-//Kd)
/n.--
IwL

REMITTANCE: It correct NO ACKNOWLEDGMENT is NECESSARY.
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING THIS CHECK
PURPOSE/OTHER
VENDOR
NO.
INVOICE
DATE
INVOICE
NO.
INVOICE
AMOUNT
LOC_
DEPT
COST
ACCT.
EQUIP.
UI
AMOUNT
MODIFICATION
FEE
CASTLE N
YNE
MOD FEE
04/0
/91 0401
1-000
50.00
645
70
5718
50
00
;y
RECEIVED
PR 1.2 1991.
LANI
I QUALITY %CTjo
MARTIN MARlETTA AGGREGATES A EGATES COMPANY • P.O. BOX 30013, RALEI NORTH CAROLIN27622 00,E 0 3 9

DIV IIESTAICT DcI ENT ACCT.
VOID SIxtr DAYS FROM DATE �
WACHOVIA BANK 6 TRUST CO.
AGGREGATES COMPANY 02035 DATE U4/07/91 RALEIGH, N.G.
V,O. BUY 30013, RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 21622-W 13
99-014039
PAY $
ro THE ORDER or
N C DEPT ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION
& NATURAL RESOURCES 1G REGATES COMPANY
T
512 N SALISBURY Si A
RALEIGH NC AUTHORIZED SONATURE
L761i
REMITTANCE: If correct NO ACKNOWLEDGMENT is NECESSARY. PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING THIS CHECIr
PURPOSE/OTH ERT 1
VENDOR
.-•„N0�.11
a�INVOICE-
sd.POATE._.
INVOICE;
NO=..r
A„ r �INVOICE(Ipi f
.,AMOUNTII
LOC
DI PT -
COST
ACCT
f: !EOI11P T T
"Y' NO
AMOUNT '
MODIFICA
ION F
E
CASTLE H
VNE
MOD FEE
04/0
/91 0401
1-000
50.00
C45
70
5718
50
DO
RECEIVED
PR 12 1991
LAN
QUALITY SECTIO
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES COMPANY • P.O. BOX 30013 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLI A 27e222 4039

o�
TO
--,//' - J9YM�
DATE
SUBJECT
-MESSAGE
. .
v
REPLY
I
IIjIj
I
I �
l
I
SIGNED DATE
Ias ais
POLLYY PAKPAK ( IW SETS) 4P45 �
SEND PARTS 1 AND S INTACT
PARE B WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP
uMenMss

June 6, 1990 RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
JUN '? 1990
Ulan "'AL'"fy
TO: Tracy Davis, Mining Specialist SECTION
FROM: Daniel Sams, Wilmington Regional Engineer
RE: Mine Applications and Modification Requests
Martin Marietta AeEreffates Castle Havne Quarrv. New Hanover Countv (#65-01)
I apologize for my lateness in reply. We have reviewed the plan and if
the Groundwater Section has no objections based on the further dewatering
and the possibility of additional sink hole problems in the surrounding
area, we raise no objections to the modification request. However, we
need to take this opportunity to stress to them their need for continued
reclamation as they proceed and as tactfully as possible point out the need
for better reclamation than was done on the early pits on this site.
Jones Marl and Sand Company, Onslow County (#67-17) - This one is so late, if
you haven't already transfer this pit, be aware we have no objections.
Shallornar Estates. McQuaig Mine. Brunswick Countv (#10-16) - This site was in
a state of deficiencies when visited earlier this year. We received a
complaint from Mr. Bruce Krantz on December 11, 1989. Investigation at
the time could not locate Ray' McQuaig. If the tranferee is aware and
prepared to correct the current site deficiencies within a tolerable time
frame, we have no objections to the transfer. However, he shows
reservations correcting Mr. McQuaig's past deficiencies, I would advise
postponement of the transfer.
Release Request: W. R. Willis Construction Bell Pit Onslow County #67-12 -
Enclosed is our inspection report for this site. Vegetation is established
and we recommend the bond be release for this pit.
Release Request: Maurice Watts, Watts Material & Grading, Pender Coun�i
#69-11 - It is our understanding that Mr. Watts has a release request
dating back to mid 1989. Enclosed is the most recent inspection report
recommending releasing the bond for this pit.
Hvdraulic Impact Report for Beachfront Harrison Creek Quarrv. Pender Count
#69-15 - While I must defer groundwater matters to the experts in that
section, I have noted two problems with the latest incarnation of the
dewatering report. First, the wells constructed were lined for the first 21
feet of depth, which would imply to me that the water table aquafer was
not tested but the potable water aquafer below it. Since the proposed pit
is going to be 30 feet depth wouldn't it be appropriate to test the water
table. Second, the proposed "recharge ditches" continue to be located
immediately adjacent to the pit. I continue to feel that the "cone of
recharge" will intersect the cut walls of the pit creating the potential of
long term bank degradation due to the conic infiltration of recharge water.
Again, I will yield to greater expertise, if those in Groundwater are
convinced the submitted data is a sufficient model, but Rick Shiver has
voiced similar concerns, but is asking his Raleigh office to check it.

To DAIJ SAuS Date
_., OMeasa9e
Signed
wmm�,wnn
C~i �• ,•
_ apeea L m7
From ��'q DA VI� Date ��//0
�Dar� 60S
Reply
a�
SENDER —DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES.

qAt - -
ob

e *. SrwTf"
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conn,d
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
April 26, 1990
MWRANntim
T0: Don Baker
Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Tracy Davis IV
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
RE: Modification Request from Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne Quarry
Mining Permit No. 65-01
New Hanover County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the modification request and
site plan for the above referenced project. Martin Marietta Aggregates proposes
to add and mine 515 acres located west of their current mining operation.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of the
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater fisheries (G.S.
74-51 (2)). Please respond by May 25, 1990 so that we may complete our review
of the permit application within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, this office
will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to
ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and offsite sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and
freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to
perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact Mr. Horace
Willson at [phone] to set up a convenient date and time.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type applications is very
much appreciated.
TED/se
Attachments
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, P.E.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary April 26, 1990 Director
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED
TO: Don Baker
Program Coordinator 00
Wildlife Resources Commission APR J v 1 0
FROM: Tracy Davis HABITAT CUSERVATION SECTION
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
RE: Modification Request from Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne Quarry
Mining Permit No. 65-01
New Hanover County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the modification request and
site plan for the above referenced project. Martin Marietta Aggregates proposes
to add and mine 515 acres located west of their current mining operation.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of the
operation having unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater fisheries (G.S.
74-51 (2)). CPlease respond by May 259 1990 so that we may complete our review
of the permit application within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, this office
will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to
ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and offsite sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and
freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to
perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact Mr. Horace
Willson at [phone] to set up a convenient date and time.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type applications is very
much appreciated. -
RECEIVED
TEOlse
Attachments MAY 2 51990
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, P.E. NkaITi:T C'cNSEfivP. MIN. SUT10N
PO. is o 27687, Rahigh, North Carolina 276II-7687 Telephone 9I&733-3833
An Equal Opponunuy Afurranve Acnon Employer

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
April 24, 1990
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Castle Hayne Quarry #65--1
Dear Mr. Davis:
P. 0. 8OX 30013
RALEIGH, N.C. 2702,2-0013
TELEPHONE (919) 7: i-4550
f te,�, ''
r.• 9
�'1 y �
A PR
1990
�Ioj{i
We have attached two amended mine maps showing the way we propose to mine the 515
acre tract west of our current mining operation at Castle Hayne, The property is flat,
therefore we do not anticipate having to do much in the way of erosion control. We
would like to address this issue as required in the field. Sedimentation has not been a
problem in previous slot ruining operations on this site.
If you require further information, please contact me. Thank you for your attention in
this matter.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron, ASLA, APA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC/oe
Attachment
cc: H. S. Willson

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
April 24, 1990
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27657
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Castle Hayne Quarry #65-1
Dear Mr. Davis;
P. 0. BOX 30013
RALEIGH, N.C. 27622-0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
.E( EI VED
APR 5 1990
ONO
"114i.ITY SECTION
We have attached two amended mine maps showing the way we propose to mine the 515
acre tract west of our current mining operation at Castle Hayne. The property is flat,
therefore we do not anticipate having to do much in the way of erosion control. We
would like to address this issue as required in the field. Sedimentation has not been a
problem in previous slot mining operations on this site.
If you require further information, please contact me. Thank you for your attention in
this matter.
Sincerely, r
Carole Cameron, ASLA, APA
Landscape Specialist
Environmental Services
CC/oe
Attachment
cc: H. S. Willson

I
It I
i I o \�
I � �
0
k�
3
T
�
Q—
uIt it
N If
r •' A
_
a
3
ti p Z -Di 1 0 m '= 0 o r C O
o c m) m r r r a
Z ,;< N D 0 r cn 0 0 m I 11
D Z 1 m JD r 8 o D
D n Z y A m m QI O 0 4 Jt ' I �94 t1h9balto
,,u11' /N
it
a 0 1 C7 ty 11 /"y' j
O. 2 On p O N O 2 Di/
� ;0 N- A O „
O!_ a< r D N m O A Z � i u
o m- ill
mIf
m o (naZ mr In
In /• �,
O 0 m m
r
> r
�'It
0 / iff
!,
j 1
W Z N 1 't e, // \ 111
If f
T L
T, O17
CJ 1
11
i
D O it
I
<
.0 O if l
..CIA N Il 1 li
mix 1 e 'it
z
—y,
o I 1 I 11
F'� r' I ll
Iz fill
,��,�
It �j�l
I
��I � I
a p IIII III I" II II'F
11
�I F II ICI III l�Lr, 11
m �`� OI III �I jlf L' 11 II
o� o �Wl III Fl III 1' III I i'1
n _u n I o o �� I'I� �L� III 1 1 �� III I I[
�IIil 111II�II jf1lll�,
> o m o jII II
it
1 t �I {�� IllI r '
n Z 0 / II 'yitF FiI4��{4i�11�',I I.. FI 1
/ l li.
m o --i a� 1I,��IIf IIaI I�FI�q f' III1 I 1
,. F11 III I!�I I�'!II (IIII ' IN
/ � k ,rp: I
O
D
0
--4I I'FII ': --------- I -
IF
z I I � I I; I
D z z x 1.1�1(llll�It
� �II�III I(
m 0 D `0 71I IPI' IFII IIII
d 11F..11
a
v
m
D
O _0
a < "n,
'1
�J��`�SI I.
PIN
o
a
0
CoICl/i
O
o
0
0
°
m�
I J
�I
- gf
.r'1��1II1
I III
IIII II�IIII '' 11
I�11�1.11�1'I � I�I
r �I
I
II ill��lll !: Z
.I�II��II�II1 ;
III�II�I�111� s I
�IIII�I�III,�II � �
I �IIII�4�1f• � O ��
illy 1 p N
IIf
' Illl ICI
If
$' n
�EI,I
III1�1,1
OOO)Gv
- F oa0•os
I-. _ __. IL ... 00 0 I S
y n 111 !�Ili�l 11h,!I',II�I'Ijll'I`I I
000'a S
-- doo'Es —fi
�IIt'�'1'II�I
I� I�IIII�II,II ��� �'I III
r� � IJJI�III I II� �It?II - I
IF 1 III
I,II Ills I f ll�l I��I
i, �IfIIIII� I III�II'.I,
�o I
F'Il�l�l llll�l_II�' -- C-- 000'ss
tIF�Iiliil���1111I1h�,r ---
000 e s
000 `z s
ICI �III I�I�j IIII illll�ll�lal�' i.,l�ll,t
I
000'I
1� I �I �illi�l IIII � '
AVI1!'111!a11
- - ------- - 000
9
FI IIII'IAlIFI
I�I�I�FIIj iII � I
1til 1,IIFIIIIIJ IIII
I
I IIII r
�1
I�IIjI'I�IrII,II I I
��IIlIIIIIII I
ill!�I�li!�I I
F F m O
rk;o
0 0
0

r
�
t
J7
A
s
g
s
J
4
2
Z
Ld
r
¢
m
a
U
W
N
LL _
¢
C7
U
N
Q
`
—
Q
co
F-
F
0
/
W
m
w
<
c
o
ea
co
m
cn
o
Zir
y
a
a
U
N
W
F
�
p

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
DMslon of Land Resources
lames G. Martin, Govemor Chades H. Cerdner
NAlllam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary - Director
April 24, 1991
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
RE: Incorporation of Mining Permit No. 65-03
into Mining Permit No. 65-01
Castle Hayne Quarry
New Hanover County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
Your recent request to have Mining Permit No. 65-03 incorporated
into Mining Permit No. 65-01 has been approved. Attached is an updated
copy of Permit No. 65-01, which includes the requirements and conditions
of both previous permits. Please note the mine name shall be Castle
Hayne Quarry, and the expiration date shall be duly 20, 1992.
Please be advised that at the time of renewal, a detailed Sediment
and Erosion Control Plan, renewal fee, and renewal application for the
entireminesite must be submitted to this office for review. We look
forward to your renewal request in the near future.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Tac Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/BUS/se
Attachment
cc: Dan Sams
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oppa nlly M nnadve Acuon Employer

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC
5 8, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne Quarry
New Hanover County - Permit No. 65-01
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

Page 2 of 9
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is
hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity
with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part
of this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the
surrounding environment and for reclamation of the land and water
affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is expressly
conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved
Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the approved
Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or other
security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that both
operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the
successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference
to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and
conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and
requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written
notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall
have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed
modification, revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in
addition to the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures
authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining
Act, N.C.G,S. 74-49.
Update
April 24, 1991: This permit has been updated to include the
requirements and conditions of Mining Permit No. 65-03.
Modifications
March 13, 1981: This permit has been modified to include approximately
184 acres north of the Ideal Cement spur of the Seaboard Coastline, east
of the proposed right-of-way of Interstate 40 and south of S.R. 1002.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until July
20,-1992.

Page 3 of 9
rnndifinnc
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, iN.C.G.S.
74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with
the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
2. Air Quality_and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions
including fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and
rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management
Commission.
B. During quarry operation, ~eater trucks or other means that may
be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving
the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining"activity affecting wetlands shall be in accordance with
the requirements and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and
any adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from
erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse.
C. Sufficient buffer (a minimum of 200 feet) shall be maintained
between any excavation and any adjoining property line or
highway right-of-way to prevent caving of said property and to
allow grading of the side slopes to the required angle. These
buffer zones, with the exception of the installation of
required sediment control measures and earthen berms, shall
remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. The operator shall notify the Wilmington Regional Office, Land
Quality Section, at least 48 hours prior to beginning any of the
land disturbing activities indicated in the approved
application for a mining permit.

Page 4 of 9
3. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to
diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams,
silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and
maintained to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent
surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in
proximity to the affected land.
C. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to
the Department for approval prior to any land disturbing
activities not indicated on the mine maps submitted with the
approved application for a mining permit. Such areas include,
but are not limited to, expansion outside of the initial pit
area, creek crossings, or expansion of overburden disposal
areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
Observation wells shall be installed and monitored as deemed
necessary by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for -graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the
angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate
erosion control measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause
offsite damage because of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain
such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any pit
opening created on or after April 24, 1991 shall be graded to a
minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be
stabilized within 60 days of completion. Furthermore, a
minimum ten (10) foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at
the top of. the rock and at the toe of the overburden slope on
any subsequent pit openings.
7. Surface Drainaoe
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of
water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.

Page 5 of 9
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at this facility. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the report's recommendations into the
production blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided,
the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of ground motion
shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the immediate location of any
building outside of the permitted area regularly occupied by human
beings such as dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building outside of the permitted area.
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear (dBL) as
measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied building
such as any dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that
flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or
permanently guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the
guarded area or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department immediately and
further use of explosive at the site shall be immediately suspended
until the following actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall
be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation shall be
provided to the Department within 10 days of the incident. Said
- report shall, at a minimum, document the cause(s) of the
incident along with technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the Department before
blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take corrective measures
to prevent flyrock and repeated instances of flyrock shall be
considered a violation of this permit.
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of
intervals; depth and size of holes; type and total pounds of
explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall be maintained
at the permittee`s mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.

Page 6 of 9
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour
advance notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or
fencing shall be maintained at all times around the perimeter of any
highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. In addition, any
high walls created on or after April 24, 1991 shall have a minimum
10 foot wide horizontal safety bench at the junction between the
top of rock and the toe of the overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screenin
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional
screening methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be
employed as deemed appropriate by the Department.
B. Anv berms to be constructed shall have 3 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter sideslopes and shall be constructed a
minimum of 50 feet from the SR 1002 right--of-way. Said berms
shall be stabilized within 60 days of construction. In
addition to grasses, loblolly and/or Virginia pines shall be
planted as deemed appropriate by the Department to improve
visual and noise buffering.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to
delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or
erosion/sediment control plan contained in the approved application for a
mining permit. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from
the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that are generated
outside of the mining permit area shall be allowed within the
boundaries of the mining permit area unless authorization to conduct
said disposal has first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste Management and the Land Quality Section, Department of
Environment, Health and Natural -Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.

Page 7 of 9
B. Refuse generated on -site and directly associated with the mining
activity such as drill steel, conveyor beltinq, screen cloth and cable
may be disposed of in a designated refuse area provided that said
disposal is in accordance with the regulations and requirements
administered by the Division of Solid Waste Management. All other
waste products must be disposed of in an approved offsite disposal
facility. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage
containers or any other material that maybe considered hazardous shall
be disposed of within the permitted area.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report_ shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$25,000 blanket bond is sufficient to cover the operation as
indicated on the approved application. This security must remain
in force for this permit to be valid. The total 'affected land
shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. ArchaeoioQical Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources.

Page 8 of 9
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which
is a condition on the continuing validity of that Miring Permit. Additionally,
the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues
beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1'. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the
possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided
in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for
the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined
area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic
and reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina
Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation
Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to
the time schedule included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible
provide reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any event,
provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time after completion or
termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and shall be
completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned
reclamation shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water,
provide a permanent barricade (fence) along the top of any highwall, and
grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable
for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles
shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to I vertical or flatter slope and
terraced as necessary to insure slope stability.

Page 9 of 9
B. The settling ponds, sediment control basins and pit clarification pond
shall be backfilled, graded„ and stabilized or cleaned out and made
into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the
mine excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared
before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site.
On -site disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating
Condition 12A and B.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Following site preparation, disturbed areas not inundated by lakes
shall be revegetated in grasses and pine trees. Soil nutrients
shall be added according to a soil test.
Broadcase a mixture of Sericea Lespedeza (scarified) 40 lbs.;
Weeping Lovegrass, 4 lbs. and Common Bermudagrass, (hulled) 5 lbs.
per acre during the months of March or April. Immediately after
seeding, mulch the side slopes with a suitable material. This
mixture will provide a good border of food and cover for wildlife.
The grass will become established much quicker if during the
establishment period for the first summer,. nitrogen isbroadcast at
the rate of 40 lbs. of per acre every 4 weeks until the grass is
established. Maintain the stand by fertilizing as recommended by
the N. C. Department of Agriculture soil test.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent
feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible
after completion or termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be completed
within two years of completion or termination of mining.
This permit, issued ,luly 20, 1972 and renewed/modified March 13,
1981, is hereby updated this 24th day of April, 1991 to include the
requirements and conditions of Mining Permit No. 65-03.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
m3
REC qv "1)
LAND QL!a i7 �y
January 27, 1994
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
and Commmity Development
Division of Iand Resources
land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh,NC 27611
Attn: Mr. James D. Simons
Gentlemen:
EVIonnon Depanm
P.O. Box tens
Fan COIMs. Colorado 80522
303 482 5603
303 482 580B
A*R$
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, Ideal hereby
requests that Mining Permit 65-3 for the Castle Hayne quarry, New
Hanover County, be transferred to:
Martin Marietta Corporation
Aggregates Division
2710 Wycliff Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. W. H. Powell
Attached are two copies of the Annual Reclamation Report for 1983,
reporting no new disturbance and no reclamation for the year, since
the plant has not been operated since Dec®mber 1982.
I wish to take this opportunity to thank you and the Division for a
very pleasant relationship during Ideal's operations. You have been
mast helpful and knowledgeable in dealing with our problems.
If any further information is needed, please contact me.
Sincerely,
P. E. 'Thomsen
Senior Mining Engineer
PEL:jep
Enclosure
cc: Martin Marietta Corporation (w/enc. )

C0•a-o /
.44 ...s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of land Resources
lames G. Martin, Governor Charles H. Gardner
WIDIart1 W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
April 24, 1991
Ms. Carole Cameron
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
RE: Incorporation of Mining Permit No. 65-03
into Mining Permit No. 65-01
Castle Hayne Quarry
New Hanover County
Dear Ms. Cameron:
Your recent request to have Mining Permit No. 65-03 incorporated
into Mining Permit No. 65-01 has been approved.. Attached is an updated
copy of Permit No. 65-01, which includes the requirements and conditions
of both previous permits. Please note the mine name shall be Castle
Hayne Quarry, and the expiration date shall be July 20, 1992.
Please be advised that at the time of renewal, a detailed Sediment
and Erosion Control Plan,.renewal fee, and renewal application for the
entire mine site must be submitted to this office for review. We look
forward to your renewal request in the near future.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Tac Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/BUS/se
Attachment
cc: Dan Sams
P.D. Box Z7687 • Raleigh. N.C. 2761I-7687 • Telephone [phone]

View Ask Report Create Modify Image Forms Tools Scripts Exit
•] Standard Form [i]�
rmit No.: 65-01 Owner: MARTIN MARIETTA
unty: NEW H Mine Name: CASTLE RAYNE QUARRY
gion: 8 A
ntact Person: HORACE WILLSON Phone: [phone]
iling Address: P.O. BOX 30013
ty: RALEIGH State: NC Zip: 27612
Commodity Code: CS
Issue Date: 7/27/72
Permit Revised Date: 8/14/92
Total Acres Permitted: 1575
Bond Amount: 25,000.00
Tvne of Bond: B01
Application Rec'd Date: 3/27/72
Public Hearing Date:
Expiration Date: 8/14/2002
Date Denied:
Mine Status: A
Release Date:
Last Update: 7/06/93
Last Inspection: Next Inspection:
Last NOV: Last NOD:
ARR Rec'd Date: 1/29/93 No. Insp/Yr: 0 No. Insp to Date: 0
Latitude: 3422036 Longitude: 7751524 Quadrangle:
*ACRES DISTURBED ANNUALLY* (no. 2 on ARR form)
884 Of 1290 sr'sx MWHW.,.sti@
Fl Help F7 Table Ctrl-PgUp Prev Ctrl-PgDn Next Alt-F9 COEdit Main
View Ask Report Create Modify Image Forms Tools Scripts Exit
_[•] Standard Form [S]�
*ACRES RECLAIMED AND RELEASED ANNUALLY* (Central office only)
Tailings Ponds: 0 Stockpiles: 0 Wastepiles: 0
Processing Plant: 0 Active Mine Area: 236 Total: 236
*CUMMULATIVE ACRES DISTURBED AND UNRECLAIMED* ( no. 4 on ARR form)
Tailings Ponds: 125 Stockpiles: 20 Wastepiles: 0
Processinq Plant: 10 Active Mine Area: 470.5 Total: 625.5
i I2L*iwl:lll�bY:Ei
0
Fish/Wildlife:
0
Pasture: 0
3n:
0 Forestry:
O
Other: O
RING
LAND
USE*
0
Fish/Wildlife:
0
Pasture: 0
Dn:
0 Forestry:
0
Other: 0
COMMENTS:
884 of 1290. ;x �- H,. < .,� . s i/iz sx.3.6:czN"i �y9c S..$rY �{rk3i•J
F1 Help F7 Table Ctrl-PgUp Prev Ctrl-PgDn Next- Alt-F9 COEdit Main

- -
.'.iS
,...
..
. ..
..
.r ..

- View Ask Report Create Modify Image Forms Tools Scripts Exit
=193 Standard Form [i]�
Permit No.: 65-03 Owner: MARTIN MARIETTA
County: NEW H Mine Name: CASTLE BAYNE QUARRY
Region: a
Contact Person: HORACE WILLSON Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 30013
City: RALEIGH State: NC Zip: 27622 -
todity Code: CS Application Rec'd Date: 3/27/72
e Date: 7/27/72 Public Hearing Date:
iit Revised Date: 8/20/82 Expiration Date: 8/20/92
1 Acres Permitted: 2979 Date Denied:
. Amount: 25,000.00 Mine Status: A
of Bond: B01 Release Date:
Last Update: 7/06/93
• Inspection: Next Inspection:
. NOV: Last NOD:
Rec'd Date: 1/29/90 No. Insp/Yr: 0 No. Insp to Date: 0
tude: 3422300 Longitude: 7749448 Quadrangle:
DISTURBED ANNUALLY* (no. 2 on ARR form)
885 of 1290 Ea.s a«i r.'Y: a.x�'',
Fl Help F7 Table Ctrl-PgUp Prev Ctrl-PgDn Next Alt F9 CoEdit Main
= View Ask Report Create Modify Image Forms Tools Scripts Exit
=[•] Standard Form [i]�
*ACRES RECLAIMED AND RELEASED ANNUALLY* (Central office only)
Tailings Ponds:
0 Stockpiles:
0
Wastepiles: 0
Processing Plant:
0 Active Mine
Area:
0 Total: 0
*CUMMULATIVE ACRES
DISTURBED AND UNRECLAIMED*
( no. 4 on ARE form)
Tailings Ponds:
Stockpiles:
Wastepiles:
Processing Plant:
Active Mine
Area:
Total:
*PRE -MINING LAND USE*
Cropland: 0
Fish/Wildlife:
0
Pasture: 0
Recreation:
0 Forestry:
0
Other: 0
*POST -MINING LAND
USE*
Cropland: 0
Fish/Wildlife:
0
Pasture: 0
Recreation:
0 Forestry:
0
Other: 0
COMMENTS:
885 of 1290
F1 Help F7 Table Ctrl-PgUp Prev Ctrl-PgDn Next Alt F9 COEdit Mein r-.
?Iti�l�3 fir] <(1 1 `bM4

F n r
State of North Carolina Li `L 1/ L
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development FEB 1 1899
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
LAND QUALITY SECTION .
Application for a Mining Permit
After July � 1,1972, nou4m�operator ~shall engage in mining'without�having�� first
obtained from the Department an operating permit which covers the affected land
and which has not terminated, been revolted, been suspended for the period in
question, or otherwise become .invalid.
1. Name of Mine Castle Hayne - Ideal
County New Hanover
2. Name of Company Martin Marietta Corporation - Aggregates Division
3. .Nome Office Address 2710 Wycliff Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
4,
Permanent address for
receipt of official mail
P. 0. Box 30013
` .' Raleigh, NC 27622Telep6aee
919/781-4550
5.
Mine Office Address
Castle Mayne Quarry, P.
0.. Box 398, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
-
-
�,Telepbome 919/675-2283
6.
Mine Manager Hutch
Barnhardt
We, hereby certify that all details
contained In this Permit Applina-
t£on_are true.and :correct to the beat
of. ourtkaowledge. We fully. uudersfand
that,any,wil.1£ul misrepresentation of
field will be'+cease for permit revocation.
*Signat�ae AO/L 7�
Title President, Aggregates Division
Date
*Signature of company officer required.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is' -requested:
Acres owned Acres leased 650
2. Materials mined: Marine Limestone.
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground
Shovel and Truck Dr`dgliie and Truck Qx Self -loading Scraper
Other Front end loader and trucks. Dragline for -overburden removal.
4. Present depth of mine 35' below YBL
S. Expected maximum depth'of mine 551 below MSL
6. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site thatis inactive and has
not been reclaimed: 'The entire existing marl pit will be mined for limestone.
b., Acres previously reclaimed at present site 0
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.-
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage:
a. Area used for tailing ponds Clarification Fond
b.,,Area used .for stockpiles
c. Area used for waste piles
d. :Area used for processing plants
e. -Area of active mine excavation.
E. Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by
mining 0
g. Estimate total' land disturbed by mining that -is
subject to reclamation by multiplying'Item 2f by 3=
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g
13
acres
•
acres
67
acres.
0
acres
389
acres
N/A acres
462 acres

Y
-,rr r^s I �aF
0
rl
EL ns( nr'3co'"e7 r1:,
�r
Q'E
r \'
c
Qfl.,�

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Application for a Mining Permit
G. S. 74-50 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, "The Mining Act of 1971"...
After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in mining without having first /
obtained from the Department an operating permit which covers the affected land
and which has not terminated, been revoked, been suspended for the period in
question, or otherwise become invalid.
1. Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE PLANT QUARRY County
2. Name of Company
IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC., CEMENT DIVISION
NEW HANOVER
3. Some Office Address P. 0. Box 8789, Denver, CO 80201
Exploration, Geology
P. 0. Box 1949, Fort Collins, CO 80522 Telephone [phone]
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail A. L. Simon, Jr., Plant Manager
P. 0. Box 9, Castle Hayne, NC 28429 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Office Address Same as above
6. Mine Manager A. L. Simon, Jr., Plant Manager
gob pylp3
RECEOVED
JUL 0 1982
i
LAND Q0ALITY SECTION
I
Telephone
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the best
of our knowledge. We fully understand
that any willful misreprese ation of
facts will be causerr e t revocation.
*Signature ,
Title y
Date
*Signature of company officer required.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned 29979 Acres leased None
2. Materials mined: Limestone (is) and clay .
+ 3, Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Q Underground Q
Shovel ehd Truck 0 Dragline and Truck Self -loading Scrapero
Other Front End Loader & Truck--Dragline for overburden
4. Present depth of mine 30 to 58 feet ---Quarry floor 30 - 42.feet
e ow sea eve
5.1 Expected maximum depth of mine 42 feet below sea level
6, Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map,)(yellow)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive and has
not been reclaimed: None, see Reclamation Plan, Page 2, Paragraph 3.
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present sitellinor only --see Reclamation Plan.
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 70 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage: see at map ccc-1377 with areas outlined
a, Area used for Wuega�ingari fi cation ponds 1&2 in 177 acres
depleted quarries
b. Area used for stockpiles(variable minor; inclyaet in acres
c. Area used for wai2as fleserburden R&C Pond 1 I 39
p acres
d. Area used for processing plants(incl.20 ac. roads not .12, acres
outlined on map ccc-1377)
e. Area of active mine excavation.( lgggpp 799P) 151 acres
(includes 57 acres to be redisturbed)
f. Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by
mining 15 51 acres
Areas quariletl Fear refuse pond 2 (overbYedee)above
pondve
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 3= na acres
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g 539 acres

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total affected acreage figure from B,
2 equals acreage to be bonded.
0 — 4.99 acres ($ 2;500 bond)
O 5 - 9.99 acres ($ 5, 000 bond)
Ej 10 - 24.99 acres ($12,500 bond)
U 25+ acres ($25,000 bond)
4. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining operations
in North Carolina? es No
Check the amount of blanket bond: N/A
$2,5DD $12,5DO
$5,000 Q . $25*000
C. Protection of Natural Resources
1. What precautions will be taken during mining operations to prevent
significant adverse effects on wildlife, or freshwater, estaurine or
marine fisheries? Since hunting was stopped in 1976, the property has become a
came preserve, with deer often seen in the quarry and at the plant site.
Drainage to Refuse & Clarifications ponds protects river and estuarine
fisheries.
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine?
Yes FX � No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Division of
Environmental Management, Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development.
NC 000 3697 Expiration Date June 30, 1983
3. Is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Yes © No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Division of
,
Environmental Management, Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development,
2109 R 2 Expiration Date October, 1, 1985
Several plant area standard type dust collectors are also registered. �—

I
4
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Describe methods being taken during mirdng to prevent physical
hazard to any neighboring dwelling house, public road, public,
commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation.
A minih= buffer of 200 feet is maintained along Highway 1002.
This mi nnimn buffer' will be maintained in the future as the
quarry operation approaches property boundaries.
5. Describe measures to be taken during mining to insure against
(1) substantial erosion and offsite deposits of sediment (in-
clude specific plans for erosion control for mine excavation,
waste piles, and process areas), (2) landslides, (3) acid water
pollution.
5(1): With the quarry excavation below sea level, 95 percent of the
irainage is into the quarry. Only that precipitation falling
unthe limited perimeter overburden pile outslopes could in-
volve erosion of sediment. As the overburden is sandy clay,
it revegetates raoidly. No erosion problem has developed from
this minor item.
The largest depleted quarry area currently occupies 260 acres.
A haul road through this area provides a containment dam for
the current Plant Refuse Pond, a feature refuse area, and a final
Clarification Pond. Relatively clear water is punped from the
refuse pond and quarry dewatering throug�n the Clarification Pond.
Acid is added to reduce the pH prior to discharge into the
Northeast Cape Fear River. No erosion problems have developed
from small stockpile or access areas.
5 (2) The only areas subject to landslides are the deeper clay
deposits from which the clay rain material is quarried. Any
slide in those areas or a break in pond dikes would be into
the belm,7-sea level excavations, and thus iw-ill pose no hazard off -site.

0
APPLICATION] FOR A MINING PERMIT 5
5 (3) As stated under 5 (1), all plant discharge is into a Quarry
Refuse Pond. In accordance with water quality requirements,
acid is added to reduce the pH of water discharged from the quarry.
b. If explosives will be used, describe what precaution will be
used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring property
by flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Minor blasting is used to break up a more dense top layer of the
limestone, three to five feet thick, designated as "cap rock."
Normal blasting precautions are rigidly enforced. The use of delay
blasting technique in the below -horizon location, and distance from
neighboring property has controlled blasting hazards well within
normal limits. Air blast is mitigated by blasting only during
favorable weather conditions and by maintaining a pine tree screen.

RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the.reclamation and subsequent use of
all affected lands and indicate the general methods to be used in
reclaiming this land.
Ideal's Castle Hayne cent plant major raw materials (clay & limestone)
are quarried from adjacent fee simple property. Operation was started
in 1963. An additional 30 years reserve of these materials are present
on the 2,060-acre area between Highway 1002 and the Northeast Cape Fear
river (marked map ccc-1377 shows the east portion of this area).
Reserves on Ideal property south of the highway will be more thorough-
ly delineated in the future.
Clay which overlies the limestone is extracted from lenses where the
thickness or depth exceeds five (5) feet. Other areas where the clay
is too thin or sandy for use are designated as overburden and stripped
by dragline to worked -out limestone areas where possible. Some of the
initial perimeter cuts require overburden to be piled outward.
Az explained under 5(1) of this application, about 160 acres of depleted
quarry (nearest to the plant) are used as refuse and clarification ponds.
This use will continue for several years until the volume of fill requires
the ponds to be moved to more distant depleted quarry locations. The
higher elevations of these ponds ,v-ill eventually be reclaimed by spreading
perimeter overburden piles back as topsoil cover. All elevations below the
natal drainage level will become lake areas when dewatering ceases.
The Refuse Pond solids become wre stable than the original ground surface
when allo:,,ed to dry. These solids have been, and will continue to be used,
for road base and dam fill. The east --west haul road through the above des-
ribed Refuse Ponds will remain for future use when reserves to the east are

RECLAMATION PLAN
quarried. This road will be raised in successive lifts as necessary
to eventually be above the natural drainage elevation.
Prior to -excavation, the surface consisted of swamp and timberland.
Ideal favors reestablishment of trees, where applicable, as grass
areas would be difficult to utilize while excavation proceeds nearby.
Experience has indicated that erosion is not a problem an overburden
piles and any lush grass growth is of a negative value due to the
fire hazard.
It is felt the operation is being conducted in such a manner as to have
K
a minirrn mi effect on wildlife, fresh water, estuarine or marine fisheries.
Trees are not cleared from, new quarry areas until necessary.
In view of operation methods and reclamation plans as e-%-plained above,
Ideal feels any areas available for permanent reclamation during the
next ten (10) years will be limited to small areas. Thus, there is
no change in the reclamation plan as advanced in 1972 in the original
permit application.
The original application outlined 53 acres of pre -law disturbed area
outlined in yellow on map xcc-1259. The area east of the plant and
south of the river (currently 30 acres) has been covered with topsoil
and has revegetated. A new water course to the river was provided
through this area and some is currently designated as Plant Operating
Area. A nine (9) acre dump area west of the plant is outlined on the
ed,e of the current map ccc--1377. This nine acres has revegetated
quite well, but no special reclamation was done, as this location will
be quarried in the future.

r
RECLAMATION'PLAN
93
2. In excavation of unconsolidated materials, describe what measures v7ill
be taken to -insure protection of adjacent resources such as width of
buffer zone and grade of slope, etc.
As stated under 4, a 200-ft. mirdmm buffer zone from Highway 1002 and
property boundaries will be maintained. Unconsolidated materials, clay
and overburden, will normally not be excavated deeper than 15-18 feet,
as limestone underlying thicker overburden, thins, and is not economical
to quarry. The maxi mt grade of final slopes in unconsolidated mate-
rial will be 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical. Such final grades would not
be within the 200-ft. minimum buffer zone.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in
all comleted excavations in rock.
Because of overburden placed in worked --out quarry cuts and refuse ponds,
as previously explained, it is not anticipated any such hazards will
e)dst prior to August 21, 1992 (eViration date of this permit renewal) .
If, after that, it is desirable to leave excavated highwalls in lime-
stone, they would definitely be well beyond 5--foot wading depth of
lakes left after reclamation.
4. Indicate method of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or
other such mine waste areas.
Please see Reclamation Plan, Item 1.
5. State :-hat precautions will be taken in reclamation to insure that the
reclaimed site is not detrimental to animal or fish life.
Information under Item 3 will apply to animal life. Experience with
lake areas in other Ideal limestone quarries indicates waters in lakes
created by reclamation soon stabilizes with a pH below 9.5. Final
reclamation to lakes appears to be later than the 10-year life of this
6
permit at the Castle Layne quarry.

RECLAPWTION PLAN --IDEAL 4
6. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
A study of 1980 aerial photography indicates planting of pine in
certain areas is desirable to provide adequate screening from Highway
1002. This will be accomplished during the 1932-33 planting season.
7. State the method of rehabilitation of settling ponds.
Please refer to Reclamation Plan, - Item 1_
3. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of mining
refuse (note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971):
As previously described, refuse ponds in the Castle Mayne Cement
plant quarry do not involve the control of materials directly con-
nected with processing of the substances mined. Solid materials from
the plant to the refuse ponds are from plant cleanup and the electrical
Precipitator catch from the kiln combustion gases. The electrical
precipitator catch is not classified as a hazardous waste by the EPA.
9. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of any drainage
channels to a condition mixdzdzing erosion, siltation and other pol-
lution:
Items S (1) , (2) , and (3) explain conditions that minimize erosion -
Siltation -and other pollution is controlled in the refuse and clarifi-
cation ponds.
10. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water
collecting or remaining in mined areas.
No odious, odious or foul Trater has been encountered in past operations,
possibly due to the active pumping of water from the below sea level
ponds and quarry. Foul water is not e>mected in the reclaimed Lake
areas due to the presence of limestone.
11. Describe how the surface gradient in unconsolidated materials will be
restored to a condition suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
lard after reclamation is completed and proposed method of acco.mlisly.rent:
(5_ading and surface gradient have been described in the Reclam3ti.on Plan,
lte?.s 1 rnd 2.

RECLA14ATION PLAN --IDEAL
12. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the
affected areas: NOTE: Revegetation Plan must be approved by one of
the following:
(a) Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conserva-
tion District having jurisdiction over lands in question;
(b) Authorized representatives of the Office of Forest Resources,
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development;
(c) Country Agricultural Extension chairmen or Research and Extension
personnel headquartered at North Carolina State University in the
School of Agriculture and life Sciences;
(d) North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
(e)- Private consulting foresters referred by the Office of Forest
Resources, Department of Natural Resources and Community De-
velopment;
(f) Others as may be approved by the Department,
5
Under the previous 1972-1982 permit No.'65-3, a definite revegetation plan
was not considered applicable due to the special conditions of the Castle
Hayne plant quarry which -allow no concurrent or early permanent reclamation.
These conditions will continue for another 10 years, as explained under
the Reclamation Plan.
Ideal is in favor of adequate reclamation and will seek the assistance
of agencies active in surface treatment and revegetation of affected
areas when reclamation can proceed at the subject quarry operation.
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature (see (f) above)
Title
New
Da to

RECLAMATION PLAN --IDEAL
13. Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of G.S. 74-53.
Please refer to the Reclamation Plan Item 1 and 12 for an explanation
of conditions that prevent a meaningful time schedule of reclamation
at this time.
Any comments from the North Carolina Land Reclamation staff on this
reclamation Plan is solicited.
Return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Re4Sources
and Community_ Develop.,.E?nt .
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
n

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
T R A N S F E R
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74--46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971", Mining Permit Regulation 15 NCAC
5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne - Ideal Quarry
New Hanover County - Permit #65-3
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

Page 2 of b
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is
hereby approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in
conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for the
protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation of the
land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit
is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of
the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond
or other security on file with the Department, and may survive the
expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception: if another operator succeeds to the interest of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease,
assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from
the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the
Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the
permit to the successor operator, provided that both operators have
complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the.affected land and posts a suitable bond or other
security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the
purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the
permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in
the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a designated
time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by
the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by
the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Conditions
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by
the Environmental Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until
August 20, 1992 and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining
Act, N.C.C.S. 74 -46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:

Page 3 of b
} OPERATING CONDITIOiNS:
1. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance
with permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Division of Environmental Management.
2. Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shall be
subject to the permitting requirements and regulations promulgated
by the Division of Environmental Management.
3. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and
any adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway
from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of
the natural watercourse.
4. Adequate'mechanical barriers including but not limited to
diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt
retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to
prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or
into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected
land.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the
angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate
erosion control measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite
damage due to siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with
ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of
pools of water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul.
Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be
constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
7. The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator
to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock
or vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise
provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the
immediate location of any building regularly occupied by human
beings such as dwelling house, church, school, public
building, or commercial or institutional building.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear
(dBL) - warning, 132 dBL caution, and 135 dBL maximum as
measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied
building such as any dwelling house, church, school, public
building, or commercial or institutional building.

Page 4 of 6
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure
that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is
temporarily or permanently guarded by the operator. Should
flyrock occur beyond the guarded area, it shall be reported to
the Department immediately, who will conduct a thorough
investigation to determine the cause. Failure to take
corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated instances
of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the permit.
D. Operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes;
depth of holes; total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per
delay interval; amount of stemming and burden for each hole;
and blast location. Records shall be maintained at the
permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.
E. Operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour
advance notice to the LandlQuality Section prior to any blast
during a period for which notice is requested.
8. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any excavation and
any adjoining property line to prevent caving of that property and
to allow grading of the sideslopes to the required angle.
9. A physical barrier consisting of a fence or boulder barriers, etc.,
r:T shall be maintained around the perimeter of any highwall.
10. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained
between the mine and public throughfares whenever practical to
screen the operation from the public.
11. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied
by the Department on February I of each year until reclamation is
completed and approved.-
12. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the
form of $25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the
operation as indicated on the approved application. This security
must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The total
affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.

Page 5 of 6
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of
which is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit.
Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the
permittee, which -continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
I. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize
the possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of
the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be
provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden.and spoil shall be left in a -configuration which is
in accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is
suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of•water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the
mined area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
°? agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan, which
shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with
mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the
earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining
on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill
with ground water, barricade along the top of any highwall, and
grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface
suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or
waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter slope and terraced as necessary to insure slope
stability.

Page 6 of 6
B. Any settling ponds or sediment basins shall either be
backfilled and stabilized or cleaned out and made into
acceptable lakes.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise
prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be dumped at the mine site. Scrap
metal, trash or other such waste shall be removed from the
site and properly disposed.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of
noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Following site preparation, disturbed areas not inundated by lakes
shall be revegetated in grasses and pine trees. Soil nutrients
shall be added according to a soil test.
Broadcast a mixtures of Sericea Lespedeza (scarified) 40 pounds;
Weeping Lovegrass, 4 pounds and Common Bermudagrass, (hulled) 5
pounds per acre during the months of March or April. Immediately
after seeding, mulch the side slopes with a suitable material.
This mixture will provide a good border of food and cover for
wildlife. The grass will become established much quicker if during
the establishment period for the first summer, nitrogen is
broadcast at the rate of 40 pounds of nitrogen per acre every 4
weeks until the grass is established. Maintain the stand by
fertilizing as recommended by the N.C. Department of Agriculture
soil test.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as
soon as feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or
termination of mining.
Permit issued this / 3 day of 19�'�
By �. L
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development

J
State of North Carolina C E IV E Q
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Land Resources MAY Z%l
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P 0 R ON D QMI Y SECTION
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Castle Hayne - Ideal
Permit Number 65-3
County New Hanover Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Martin Marietta Aggregates
Mailing AddressT P. 0. Box 30013,'Raleigh, NC 27622 .
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining.
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds N/A Acres
(b) Stockpiles N/A _ _ Acres
(c) Waste Piles N/A Acres
(d) Mine Excavation Acres
TOTAL Acres
Date
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
All drainage enters the pit area for ro er clarification.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds
(b) Stockpiles
N/A Acres (c) Waste Piles
N/A
Acres
(d) Mine
Excavation
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
10
N/A Acres
0 Acres

6. Describe reclamation cafried out in last 12 soothe.
This permit covers the Ideal pit only. Reclamation will commence when an outer
pit wall has been extended to its final limit.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Manager, Environmental Services
Date May 19, 1986
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
P. O. Sox 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Develo mad[ C r ] uP
Division of Land Resources e + X,
Land Quality Section
JAN?p 1,084
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I 0 N R E P O,H�TO
For Calendar Year 1983 - LHH
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted Abperation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Castle Havre Qe.smr Permit Number 65-3
County New Hanover Telephone [phone]
Name of Company -L sl—RTsiz Inh+rtri r4 Tar Qxn»nt ni-j -;-my
Mailing Address P.O. Box 9, Castle Rayne, NC 28429
1.
2.
3
4
If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date December 1982*
Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(a) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 0 Acres
TOTAL 0 Acres
Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
Describe measures taken for erosion control:
The quarry is mostly below sea level, with interior drainage. The water
Out passes through clarification ponds and specified treatment before entering
the Cape Fear River. There is little erosion problem.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine
Excavation 0 Acres
* (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
Plant was C enporarily shut down in December 1982 due to nerket conditions, and was
permanently closed in September 1983. Quarry is presently in the process of being
sold to Martin Marietta Corporation. Please see request for trasfer of permit.

i
Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
No reclamation was rformed in 1983 because of negotiations to sell the
quarry as an operatiiM entity. �.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation Edward_.Heerend-i(�(,,�71
Title der -As set Re-DepLbo. nt...
Date January 27, 1984
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

w� YYY
�:_� MA`S i •1. 1°
111.
l.i�N� �UALISY S�C�lO
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
May 9, 1985
Mr. Horace Wilson
Martin Marietta Basic Products
Post 0-fice Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Dear Horace:
This is to acknowledge the annual reclamation inspection I made at your Castle Hayne
and Rocky Point Quarries on April 23, 1985. I appreciate your assistance along with
Dean Hardy and Carol Cameron as well as Butch Barnhardt at the Castle Hayne Quarry
and Jodie Mood at Rocky Point.
I found your reclamation efforts to be very successful at Castle,Hayne and recommend
that you continue using the same seeding specifications in future stabilization of
mined over areas. The grading and ground preparation for seeding I observed to be
adequate and commend Dean Hardy and Butch Barnhardt for a job well done at Castle
Hayne.
The Rocky Point site was also found to be in good shape and I would like to commend
Jodie Wood in his efforts at reclamation proceedings simultaneously with mining.
It goes without saying that reclamation and good conservation practices were observed
at both your Castle Hayne and Rocky Point sites. Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
Gerald J. Kraynak
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
GJK/cfl
cc: Jim Simons, Mining Specialist
7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmintirt(rn. N(,:, )")3.3a30 • 'Iclrphrmr 91�0 25t CW
An Equal opponuniw Affirmative Action Employtr

a sw4aR,.
North Carolina Department of Natural
*.Ire Resources& Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr, Governor James A. Summers, Secretary
February 20, 1984
Mr. Horace Willson -
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622
Re: Castle Hayne - Ideal Quarry Transfer
Dear Mr. Willson:
I am enclosing another title page with the correct permit
number of 65-3 for the Castle - Ideal Quarry.
Thank you for calling this to my attention.
JDS:aph
cc: Gerald Krayrak
F
DIVISION OF
LANDRESOURCES
Siepnen G. CoNa. Diiecmr
Talen""919733-0833
Sincerely,
James 0. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
Mining Specialist
\$ OFF
aT
CMG h
i
Geoloq¢al5wvey— 7332a23: Cootlefc Survey-7333836: Land Ouaviy-733-4574: Ear In Resources Rlanninq-733-3833.
Lana Resources lmm-nanon Service-7332090 Boe27687 Raleigh. NC 276n-76a7

aaLY� lr+.STA7Z
Al
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources & Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor James A. Summers, Secretary
February 14, 1984
Mr. Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
Re: Castle Hayne - Ideal Quarry Transfer
New Hanover Company
Dear Mr. Willson:
OMSION OF
LAND RESOURCES
Stephen Conrad, Director
telephone [phone]
Your request for permit'ffansfer for the Castle Hayne - Ideal Quarry from
Ideal Basic Industries to Martin Marietta has been granted.
Enclosed is the mining permit No.
us if you have any questions.
-Sincerely,
.L
James D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
Mining Specialist
JDS / j db
Enclosure
cc: Gerald Kraynak
54-3. Please review the permit and notify
Geotogical Survey--733-2423: Geooetic Survey-733-3836; Land Quah;v-- 733-:; 7 A,. Ea th Resources Planning-733-3833;
Land Resources lntormaoonService-733-2090 9o,27687 Raleigh,NC276tt-7587

ROUTING ISLIP
Simons 1..R
Gardner
Conrad
PLEASE SICK AND CGMRSPT
Pern,� tYanss4e Frd.Sdo•1 Ce.. At
D M4rj.n /Norr04�

MARTIN MARIEfTA AGGREGATES
CONSTRUCTION A33AEnATISS DIVISION
R 0. BOX WITS
RAUO0H. NORTH CAPOLINA 27922-M3
TELEPHONE(ma17e14SW
January 30, 1984
Mr. James-D. Simons, P:E. pA tt-, T.. I
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources FED 1 1984
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Subject: Request for Permit Transfer LAND QUALITY SECTION
Permit 065-3
Ideal Basic Industries - Marl Mine
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Simons:
Martin Marietta plans to remove marine limestone from the pit currently owned
by Ideal Basic Industries and covered under permit 865-3. Mining will be
from an average depth of -35 MSL to - 55 MSL. Overburden will be returned to
the mined out slots as pit development progresses.
Most of the mining will occur in the existing marl pit area. Mining in new
pit areas is not anticipated for several years. The existing Martin Marietta
limestone mine, covered under permit 565-1, will be abandoned and allowed to
fill with water. Due to the more isolated location of the Ideal pit, the effect
on residential wells is expected to be completely eliminated.
In accordance with the above planned action, Martin Marietta agrees to assume
the duties of subject permit for the area noted on the attached mine map which
shows the present affected area and the property boundaries that will be under
Martin Marietta's control.
We trust that the information provided above and the attachments are adequate
for your review. Please give me a call if there are any questions or the need
for additional information.
Sincerely,
Nofo4cz 41A#�
Horace S. Willson
Manager
Environmental Services
HSW/ce
Attachment

r
�
t
J7
A
s
g
s
J
4
2
Z
Ld
r
¢
m
a
U
W
N
LL _
¢
C7
U
N
Q
`
—
Q
co
F-
F
0
/
W
m
w
<
c
o
ea
co
m
cn
o
Zir
y
a
a
U
N
W
F
�
p

- -- v
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
RENEWAL
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G. S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971", Mining Permitting Regulation 15
N.C.A.C. 5B,.and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Ideal Basic Industries, Cement Division . permittee
for the operation of a mar] mine
entitled, Castle Hayne'Plant Quarry permit no. 65-3
and located in NEW Hamver County, which shall provide
that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands
and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

2 of 6
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, here-
inafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved Recla-
mation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclmation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or othe.rwise,the
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that
the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with
reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and con-
ditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and requirements
of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written notice of its
intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right
to a hi:aring at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to
the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definiuions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act,
N.C.G. a. 74-49.
Conditions
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air quality,
surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by the Environmental
Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until August 20, 1992
and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46,
et. sect., and to the following conditions and limitations:

3cf6
1. Any meter prsing or mire dewatering sha11 be in accordance
with permit requirements and regulations prcmulgated by the Division
of &wiromiental Management.
2.
y mining piss producing air contaminant emissions shall be subject
to the permitting requir vents and regulations pra=lgated by the
Division of Emri m mental Management.
3. sufficient buffer shall be maintatnod between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to preamt sedimentation of that waterway fram erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural
watercourse. All Federal and State xeg"lations carrAcezning "wetland
areas" shall be followed.
4' Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt Eck dmis, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent
surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to
the affected land.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion
cmntrol measure, structure or device. In any event, exposed sloes or
any excavated channels, the erasion of which may cause offsite damage
dun to siltation, snail be planted or otherwise provided with ground
cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools
of water that are, or are likely to , noxious or foul. Necessary
des such as drainage ditches or conduits shall b3 constructed
or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
7. The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
pa: event ' hazard to persons and ad jaoant property fran thrown rock or.
vib ration:
A. In all blasting operations, except. as hereinafter otherwise provided,
the maximum peak particle velocity of any canponent of ground motion
shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the iaxmediate location of any
building regularly occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or cxrm3ercial or insUtuticnai building.
B. Airblast cNexpressure shall not emceed 128 decibels linear (dEL) --
"warning," 132 dHL "caution," and 135 dBL "maximum" as measured at
the imnediate: location of any regularly occupied building such as
any dwelling house, church, school, public building, or mawrerial
or institutional building.

M� 01
C. The Wwator shall take all refua"ble to insure that
flyrr:ck is not thmwn beyond mhera the access is temporarily
or pemanmtly guarded by the operator. Mmuld flyxnak occur beycnd
the guarded area, iLt{shal l b jeYreep�az,�t�eyd� tto, to
Deegart mrit�,ii mmedtatel y,
who will �.ir a �ilwtrough investigation o dete i.IZe cause.
Failure to t ka aarn+ative meamm-es to prrownt flyrock and rated
instances of flyr ck shall be coraidered a violation of the penait.
D. Operat= shall maintain records on each individual blast describing:
the total number of hales; pattern of holes: depth of holes: total
pounds of explosives; maxim= p=ids per delay interval: amount of
sty and burden for each hole: arrd, blast looaticn. R000rds shall
be maintained at the penaittee' a mi -m office and aspics shall be
provided to the Depar�t up= requaist.
E. Operator shall, when requested by the Depart, give 24 how: advamos
notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a pecr:iod
for which rartice is requested.
8. S ffic lent buffer shall be maintained bebown arry emeavation and any
adjoining property line to prevent caving, of that pxqperty and to allow
grading of the sideslopes to the required angle. A minimin buffer of
200 feet: shall be maintained along St be lczd 1003 and other p=pearty
boundaries.
9. A visual screen of natural vegetation and/or vegetated earthen berm
shall be maintained to screen the operation frcm public view.
19. An Annual Reclamtian Report shAll be witted on a fom supplied by the
Degartmmt on February 1 of each year until reclamation is oamplebad and
ll. The security which was posted purauunt to
of indicated
�0000..000 Blanket Bnd is sufjf�ic�iye�n�t,,
as
in farce for this pen -nit to be Va1Ld:
not exceed the lxinded age.
LlI.C.G.S.- . -54 in the
t d owner th`k?�l Operation.
hiz security must rmain
The 'total affected land shall

5 of 6
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which
is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally,
the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the permittee, which continues
beyond the term of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides: �1
Minimum Standards As Provided By G. S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other uncon-
solidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility
of slides and be consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided
in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for;
the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined �!
area that are, or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic
and reforestation practices as established by the N.C. Agricultural
Experiment Station and the N.C. Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation
Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according
to the time schedule included in the plan, which shall to the extent
feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in
any event, initiation of reclamation at the earliest practicable time after
completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
1. Provide further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule, the planried
reclamation shall be to backfill mine exc-aration with refuse fr m the.
processing plant and overburden or restore the e}acacvati,on into lake areas
where refuse and overbarden is insufficient to backfill the, excavation.
Disturbed land areas shall be rev'egetated in gasses and pine trees.
2. The specifications. for surface gradient restokration to a surface suitable
for the planned future use are as follows;
A. Mine excavations shall be bac kfi3led. with plant refuse or used as
clarification ponds. Following such use overturden. stockpiled around
the perimeter of the emavation shall be respread aver the backfill,ed
awAvations, leveled and smothed.

/l .
6of 6
B. Mine excavations restored to lake areas shall have a minimum average
depth of four feet. The sideslopes in unconsolidated material below
the waterline shall be graded to a 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical grade
or flatter and 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter above the waterline.
C. Disturbed areas adjacent to the mineexcavation shall be graded and
smoothed.
D. No contaminants shall be damped at the mine site. Any disposal of
other waste on site shall be subject to the landfill rules and regulations
of the N. C. Department of Hunan Resources.
E. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious
or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Following site preparation, disturbed areas not inundated by lakes shall be
revegetated in grasses and pine trees. Soil nutrients shall be added
according to a soil test.
Broadcase a mixture of Sericea icspedeza (scarified) 40 lbs.; Weeping
Lovegrass, 4 lbs. and Eamon Bennudagrass, (hulled) 5 lbs. per acre during
the months of March or April. Bmnediately after seeding, mulch the side
slopes with a suitable material. This mixture will provide a good border
of food and cover for wildlife. The grass will became established much
quicker if during the establishment period for the first stmner, nitrogen
is broadcast at the rate of 40 lbs. of N per acre every 4 weeks until the
grass is established. Maintain the stand by fertilizing as recommended by
the N. C. Deparment of Agriculture soil test.
4. Reclamation Schedule:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent
feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible
after canpletion or termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be completed within two
years of completion or ternination of mining.
Permit issued this the 2 o %2� day of /au6.Gcr�' 19B_Z .
BY:
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Cf the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development.

ROUTING SLIP
Simons
Gardner
Conrad
PLEASE SIGN AND CDIENT
inrn:� cot r f. N H, f ✓I

�F
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Application for a Mining Permit
G. S. 74-50 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, "The Mining Act of 1971"...
After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in mining without having first
obtained from the Department an operating permit which covers the affected land
and which has not terminated, been revoked, been suspended for the period in
question, or otherwise become invalid.
1. Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE PLANT QUARRY County NEW HANOVER
2. Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC., CEMENT DIVISION
3. Rome office Address P. 0. Box 8789, Denver, CO 80201
Exploration, Geology .
P. 0. Box 1949, Fort Collins, CO 80522 Telephone [phone]
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail A- L. Simon, Jr., Plant P'anaaer
P. 0. Box 9, Castle Hayne, NC 28429 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Office Address Same as above
Telephone
6. Mine Manager A. L. Simon, Jr., Plant Manager
Ax
%/• .. , T..r ice, . _ z i l
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the best
of our knowledge. We fully u erstand
that any GIllful miare�r¢se atioa of
facts will be cause 6"P t revocation.
*Signature
Title _
Date
*Signature of company officer required.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine,
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned 2,979 Acres leased None
2. Materials mined: Limestone (1s) and clay .
3, Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Q Underground Q
Shovel and Truck EJ Dreg line and Truck 0 Self -loading Scraper
Other Front End Loader & Truck--Dragline for overburden
4, Present depth of mine 30 to 58 feet ---Quarry floor 30 - 42.feet
e ow sea eve
5. Expected maximum depth of mine 42 feet below sea level
6, Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)(yellow)
a, Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive and has
not been reclaimed: None, see Reclamation Plan, Page 2, Paragraph 3.
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site Minor only --see Reclamation. Plan.
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum),.
2. Total affected acreage: see att. map ccc-1377 with areas outlined
a. Area used for taiVjagaat_aarification ponds 1&2 in �W� 2/G- acres
depleted quarries
b. Area used for stockpiles(variable minor; InclYdedant In acres
perimeter overburden R&C Pond 1
C. Area used for �,a;s:teXpiieE T acres
d. Area used for processing plants(incl.20 ac. roads not 19, acres
. - outlined on map ccc=1377)
e. Area of active mine excavation. ggp �`
(includesYr7i=' cres to be redisturbed )-1992) �1�. acres
f. Estimate w4KI acreage of new land disturbed by -
Areasg10M717"ear refuse pond 2 (overburde above ��51C -?�L acres
q
pond IeveS)
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is -
subject to reclamation b multiplying Item 2f b 3. n/a
j Y P) g Y_ acres
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g �539�"� w acres

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development /, 1
Division of Land Resources
Land quality Section
_ A N N U A L RE C L A M A T I 0 N R E P O R T
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1982
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."'
Regulation No. 5B4O010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE QU4W Permit Number •65-3
County NEW HANOVER Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAJ, BASIC INDMTRIES, INC., CEKRU DIVISION .
Mailing Address P. 0. BOX 9, CASTLE HAYNF, NC 28429
Temporary'
11 If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date December? J982*
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months, TOTALS'JAN. 1, 1983
(a) Tailings ponds + 72 Acres 216 Plant Refuse & Pond Areas
(b) Stockpiles Adj. - 9 Acres 121 Plant stockpiles', roads, etc.
(c) Waste Piles + 11 Acres 65 Perimeter' overburden areas
(d) Mine Excavation ( -72 Pond.-41 )- 113. Acres_86 Limestone and/or clay
TOTAL 9 Acres 488
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
4, Describe measures taken for erosion control:
Erosion has not been a problem, primarily due to most of the affected area being below
sea level where 90 to 95 percent of the drainage flows. Natural revegetation of the L'
sandy clay overburden piaced on perimeter areas also helps reduce erosion from the small
drainage that flows outward. Water pumped from operating quarry areas is rooted through
clarification ponds and specified treatment before entering the northeast Cape Fear River.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a)•
Tailings Ponds
0
Acres (c)
Waste Piles
0 Acres
(b)
Stockpiles J
0
Acres (d)
Mine
0
Excavation
Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
*Plant shut down December 1982 due to market conditions for Portland Cement. Plant will
be started when mrarket, conditions improve.

fi. Describe reclamation carried out.in last 12 months..
hbst depleted quarry areas that are below natural drainage will remain active
for the life of the mine. Deposit of cement plant kiln electric precipitator
refuse and clarification ponds for dewatering pump operations w 11 continue as
a rmst important use, as blocks can beisolatedfrom operating areas. The volume
of clay and limestone used as cement plant raw materials exceed the refuse iettnned.
to provide appreciable lake surface in final reclamation.,
.Signature of person responsible for reclamation
W. CHARUS AISM
Title 22QLR1IT MT c[7D8ATnSOR
Date
Complete and return to:
Land Quality'Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687 ..
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611

Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
. •... _
RECEIVED
Exploration Depadi
Fo Colin ss Colorado80522
3034825603
'
FEB 14
30
3034625608
LAND QUAL1
SECTEON
I �(
February 7, 1983
Land Quality Section
Dept. of Natural Resources & Community
Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Annual Reclamation Report --Calendar Year 1982--Ideal Basic
Industries, Inc., Castle Hayne, North Carolina Quarry Pewit 65-3 (1982-1992)
In accordance with Regulation 5B.0010 of the Mining Act of 1971, we are
enclosing two Annual Reclamation Reports for our Castle Hai New
Hanover County cement plant,quarry for calendar year 1982.
While preparing this report, we noted some errors on our drawing
ccc-1377c submitted with our application for Permit 65-3 (1982-1992).
Therefore, we are also enclosing correctedcopies of this drawing
ccc-1377c, Rev. A, and corrected copy of our application for your
use and infarmation.
The adjustnents and corrections are as follows:
a. Refuse and Clarification Pond 1 area was understated 35 acres.
b. Cement plant and associated roads, stockpiles, etc. was ad-
justed from 130 acres to 121 acres.
c. On, drawing cdc=1377c, the old quarry area and overburden areas
in the quarry 1982-1992 were designated incorrectly in the legend.
The overburden area is not perimeter overburden and the old quarry
is not area quarried with overburden above pond levels.
d. In the process of transferring quarry area from mines to tailing
ponds over several years of operation, an adjustment of about
-41 acres is needed to reconcile the total acreage.
Please advise if any additional information is needed or required.
Sincerely,
W. Choi es Alford
Encs.
cc: N. R. Greening
Dave Good
G. M. Iochhead 7

of
56 State of North Carolina 2q 5
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R'E P 0 R T
For Calendar Year 1981
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Castle Hayne Quarry permit Number 65-3
New HanoverTelephone [phone]
Name of Company Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Cement Divisicm
Mailing Address P.O. Box 9, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
1.
2.
'3
4
If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months. Totals Jan. 1, 1982
(a)
Tailings ponds
Acres
144 Plant Refuse & Paid Areas
(b)
Stockpiles
Acres
130 Plant, Stockpiles, Roads, Etc.
(c)
Waste Piles
5 Acres
54 Permimeter Overburden Areas
(d)
Mine Excavation -
15 Acres
-199 Limestone and/or Clay
TOTAL
20 Acres
527
Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. C20 ele qS
Describe measures taken for erosion control:
Erosion has not been a problem Drimarily due to most of the affec
below sea level where 90 to 95% of the drainage flaws. Natural revegetation_of the
saaldv clay overburden placed on.perimeter areas also helps.reduce erosion from the.
small drainage that flows outward. Water purmed from operating quarry areas is
routed through clarification ponds and specified treatment before entering the
Northeast Cape.Fear River. .
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried cut in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine
Excavation 0 Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SI➢E)

L 4
6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Most depleted quarry areas that are below natural drainage will remain active for
the life of the mine. Deposit of cement plant electric precipitator refuse and
clarification ponds for the dewatering pump operations will continue as a most
inportant use, as blocks can be isolated from operating areas. The volume of
clay and limstone used as carom plant raw materials exceed the refuse returned
to provide appreciable lake surface in -final reclamation. r
Qp"ation has been as anticipa ed sincethe lost marked nap was furnished with
the 1979 report. Man will be updated for submission with penndt renewal early
in 1982.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation Oe
Tit4e e e- a.
Date /
Complete and return to:S—B�--
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
P. 0. BOX 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

August 23, 1982
Mr, IL C, Cristelli
Castle Raymes North Carolina 28429
BE: Castle awyme bum
permit #65-3
Dear Mc. Orlawlit
Your application for reroaal. of the above referenced mine
been approved, A copy of the rerAKmd parmit is enclosed,
the initial 7E77licaticn. Modifications were made am inddicated]
James D. Simone, C.P.G.B., P.E.
JDSIpg Mining Specialist
rAD QULI'P1C BHCPDCN
x: Jetty Kraynak

Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
ExplorMirin Depenmem
PO. Box 1949
Fob Collins. Colorstlo 8M22
3034825893
Ml4e25eoe
October 17. 1983
NorthCarolinaDepartment of Natural Resources
and Corry mity Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn.: Mr. James D. Simms
Gentlemen:
In accordance with our telephone conversation this date and in corm
pliance with paragraph 77-55 of the Mining Act of 1971, Ideal hereby
reports the annotme about September 12, 1983, of the
closing of t Ca le Hayn ement plant.' However, Ideal requests
that, since tia are in progress to sell the quarry as an
operating entity, the Mining Penrlit No. 65-3 be retained in force.
All environmental controls in the quarry are being maintained and
operated.
If the sale of the quarry is not ccnsivrrated, the reclamation of the
Castle Hayne quarry shall be scheduled to begin within one year of
the announced date Of closure.
If you have any questions or need further information, please call.
Sincerely,
Voi &,
P. E. Thomsen, P.E.
Senior Mining Engineer
PET: j ep
cc: F. J. Bauer
B. D. Thompson
N. R. Greening
R. L. Stiermder

z-Ssaed S ay- 7a
Exp;�es
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
Application for a Mining Permit
Article 7 of. Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, 'The
Mining Act of 1971" ...After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in
mining without having first obtained from the Department an operating
permit which covers the affected land and which has not terminated, been
revoked, been suspended for the period in question, or otherwise become
invalid.
1. Name of Mine Castle Hayne Plant County New Hanover
2. Name of company Ideal Cement Company, Division of Ideal Basic Industries,lnc
3. Home Office Address 821 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone [phone]
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail 5 or 3
Telephone
5. Mine Office Address P.O. Box 741. Castle Hayne, North Carolina 28429
Telephone [phone]
6. Mine Manager Harry W. Andrews
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are true and correct to the
best of our knowledge. We fully
understand that any willful mis-
representation of facts will be
cause for permit revocation -
*Signature
Title Plant Manager
Date /'7_i, / z 7 i 9 7 ;Z—
*Signature of company officer required.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned 2, 979 Acres leased None
2. Materials mined: Limestone (is) and Clay
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground
Shovel and Truck OX Dragline and Truck K❑ Self -loading Scraper
Other
4. Present depth of mine 30 to 58 feet. Quarry floor 30 to 42 feet
below sea level.
5. Expected maximum depth of mine 42 feet below sea level
6. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive as
of July. 1, 1972:
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site None
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage:
a. Area used for tailing ponds(worked out Limestone Area) 16 acres
b. Area used for stockpiles (Included under 2 d) 0 acres
c. Area used for waste piles or similarily affected. 64 acres
d. Area used for processing plants and other operations 80 acres
e. Area of active mine excavation as of July 1, 1972 Clay 29* acres
Limestone (exclusive of 16 acres, Item 2a) 7W
f. Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by I�
mining 24
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamationatiymn l�f�rl�4Wjfe*$f"bY 3�eriod acres
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g acres
* Overlies limestone. 4 09
** 24 x 10 years + 40 Ac (factor for thinner Ls)-37 Ac
(Ls under 2C) + 57 Ac (new waste piles).

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT *(Rev. 5/22/72)
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total affected acreage figure from B,
C.
2 equals acreage to be bonded
0
- 4.99 acres
($ 2,500.bond)
5
- 9.99 acres
($ 5,000
bond)
10
- 24.99 acres
($12,500
bond)
�X
25+
acres
($25,000
bond)
4. Mill your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining opera-
tions in North Carolina? Yes No
Check the amount of blanket bond:
$2,500 $12,500
$50000 $25,000
1. What aspect of your mining operation may have significant effect on wild-
life, or freshwater, estuarine or marine fisheries?
* An explanation of the mining methods and unusual features of
the operation as listed under Reclamation Plan question I,
will be helpful to explain the contention that this effect is
minimal. See also C2 and C4,
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine?
Yes QX No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of Water
and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
Permit No. 2114, Solids Settling Pond Expiration Date June 30, 1976
b. is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Yes FRI No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of
Water and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources,
Certificate of Approval No. 12 Explration Dete December 31, 1973
Regist�at�on num ers -7T- - ru an o etlJTS9u€u37Z5/70.
3. If your mining -excavation will come within 300 feet of any neighboring
9

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
dwelling house, school, church, hospital., commercial or industrial
building, public building or public road, describe methods to prevent
physical hazard to such features.
No mining operations will be conducted within 100 feet of
State Highway 1002 right-of-way plus a slope of 1I horizontal
+ l vertical in unconsolidated overburden materials.
4. Describe measures to be taken to insure against (1) substantial deposits
of sediment in stream beds or lakes, (2) landslides, (3) acid water
pollution-
(1) Permit No. 2114 from the State of North Carolina, Department
of Water and Air Resources was issued July 26, 1971 for
a 16-acre solids settling pond located in worked out
quarry area. This settling pond will soon be expanded
to 29 acres and further expansion to about 90 acres is
expected during the 10-year permit period. Any break
in the settling pond retaining structure would flood
into the quarry rather than involve streams in the area.
(2) Clay is the only type of material that tends to slide
and this area is at least I mile from existing streams.
(3) Acid water is not possible in limestone areas and no acid
water is involved in the cement plant operation.
3

� f t
� e
� -, y � + �
S ,.��

Reclamation Flan
1. Describe your intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all
affected lands and indicate the general methods to be used in recEaiming
this land. *(Rev. 5/22/72)
Ideal's Cement Plant major raw materials are obtained
from adjacent owned property. Operation was started in 1963.
Proven reserves exceed 50 years supply for the 2060-acre
area located north of Highway 1002.
The calcareous component comes from limestone beds of
varying thickness (0-44 Ft.) lying below natural sand, sandy
clay, and/or clay which is mostly overburden. The clay or
argillaceous component is extracted from areas where clay
lies in lenses thicker than 5 feet. The overburden is
stripped by dragline and placed in worked out limestone areas
where possible. Some of the perimeter overburden piles will
require rehandling as the quarry is expanded and recovery of
the underlying limestone is justified. *Overburden material
readily supports vegetation without special. treatment. The
quarry operation and long range reclamation plan appear to
be in harmony with the intent of the North Carolina Mining
Act of 1971 "Findings" and "Purposes" as given in Sections 2
and 3 of the Act. An original problem was eliminated when
a worked out portion of the quarry was avai.l.able as a settling
pond to handle all plant process and washup discharge.
The basic fact that the quarry excavation is below natural
drainage, limits eventual reclamation to a lake area. Settling
pond area will be expanded as additional portions of the derleted
limestone excavation can be converted to that use. Future
lake perimeter overburden will be placed to eliminate peaks,
and ridges will be partially rounded to insure stability and
support temporary natural revegetation. The long range plan
logically relies on this material as cover for vegetation
purposes on portions of settling pond solids which will be-
come an eventual surface at elevations above the permanent
lake level.
The settling pond solids become more stable than normal
ground surface, and are used for dam and road -fill material,
a; needed. When the southeast quarry is delted, in about 20
years, and pumping stopped, the entire excavation will be
available as a settling pond that would function=as long as
the Castle Hayne plant is operated.

Reclamation Plan
la (question 1 continued)
Prior to excavation, the surface consisted of swamp
and timberland. Ideal favors reestablishment of trees
where applicable,as grass areas would be most difficult
to utilize while excavation proceeds nearby. Experience
has indicated that erosion is not a problem on overburden
Piles and any lush grass growth is of negative value due
to the fire hazard.
It is felt the operation is being conducted in such
a manner as to have a minimum effect on wildlife, fresh-
water, estuarine or marine fisheries. Trees are not
cleared from new quarry areas until necessary, no streams
are to be disturbed and no'water polution problems are
evident in the pumping of clear, unpoluted water from the
quarry.
Overflow from the settling pond is to the quarry.
In view of operation methods and reclamation plans
as explained above, Ideal does not feel any areas will
be available for permanent reclamation in accordance .�iith
the North Carolina Mining Act of 1971, during this initial
1 O- year •pe rm i t period.
la

Reclamation Plan
2. Indicate what practices you will take to protect adjacent surface resources.
Adjacent surface resources consist of timber lands mostly
owned by Ideal Cement Company. Trees are allowed to remain
until necessary to clear for advancing quarry operations. See
Mining Permit application item C4 for operation within 300 feet
of State Highway 1002.
3. State the method of prevention or elimination of conditions that will be
hazardous to animal or fish life in or adjacent to the affected areas:
No such hazardous conditions are known.
4. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
excavations in rock.
Quarry excavation operations comply with all Federal, State,
and local rules and regulations including the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970, State inspection and suggested rules of
the Portland Cement Association.
5. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
Current quarry operation is screened from Highway 1002 now.
Planting of Pine seedlings north of Highway 1002 will improve
this screening as quarry operations approach this highway.
6. State the method of rehabiLi.tation of settling ponds if to be reclaimed
during the life of the permit.
No settling pond area will be compplete during the 10-year
permit period. As explained under C4, the settling pond area
will be increased in size as additional worked out quarry is
available. If, after many years,the settled solids rise above the
eventual lake level, the area will be covered with surrounding
waste piles prior to reclamation plantings.
2

t
+.
- � �
� t
.. �
�
1
.. a`. _
I
.. 1 � _ i
� �—
i
, i i �
� � 1

-Reclamation Plan* (Rev. 5/22/72)
7, State the method of control. of contaminants and disposal of mining refuse:
There are no,contaminants or mine refuse. Quarry area
overburden or waste piles consists of sandy clay which readily
supports natural revegetation. Settling pond material will
require topping with overburden to promote early revegetation.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of stream channels and
stream beds to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution:
* No stream channels will be disturbed. No erosion, siltation,
or other pollution of stream channels is anticipated.
9. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting
or remaining in mined areas.
Water areas will be maintained at sufficient depth or drainage
will be provided. The sandy surface material, ample rainfall,
and the sizeable quantities of water pumped from the quarry tend
to eliminate any foul water collection problems.
la. Describe how the surface gradient in unconsolidated materials will be re-
stored to a condition suitabLe for the proposed subsequent use of the land
after reclamation is completed and proposed method of accomplishment:
Shorelines of the eventual lake, will be sloped 12 horizontal
to 1 vertical or more gentle dependent upon the indicated use
of the lake at that time. Further indication on use of the
lake appears to be only speculation at this time. See
Reclamation question No. 1 for further explanation.
3

' rini-.lu l'�,

Reclamation Plan * (Rev. 5/22/72)
11. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the
affected areas. Note requirement of Regulation Dumber 1.
* No problems are anticipated to revegetate future lake shore-
lines as the overburden materials consist of sand and clay
with no question as to their suitability to support vegetation.
All acreages reported under B2 will be active, subject to
future disturbance or operation use for the requested 10-year
permit period. See further detailed explanation of the
reclamation plan given under question 1. No permanent
reclamation work is considered practical during this first
10- yea r permit period.
Ideal plans to reclaim the 53., acres listed as inactive
affected area, reported disturbed and inactive prior to the
effective date of the North Carolina Mining Act of 1971.
Some of this work has already started and the solid waste
disposal portion will be conducted as experimental work.
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature See above
Tit le
Agency
Date
4

Reclamation Plan
12. Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of Section 8 of this Act.
All acreages reported under B2 will be active and not subject
to reclamation during the requested 10-year permit period.

Land Entry Agreement
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right
of entry and traveL upon our lands or operation for the purpose of making necessary
field inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the adminis-
tration of this Act.
We further grant the right to make whatever entries on the Land and to take
whatever actions may be necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the
operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant
to Section 14.
*Signed
Title Plant Manager
Mine Castle Hayne Quarry
Company Ideal Cement Company
* Signature should be the same as the officer who signed the application for a permit.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE -
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Pender-New Hanover Work Unit, P. O. Boa 248, Burgaw, N. C.
May 15, 1972
Mr, Harry Andrews
Ideal Cement Company
Castle Rayne, N. C. 28429
Subjects Reclamation Plan
Dear Mr. Andrewss
I have the following suggestions for stabilizing the
area of side slopes along the edge of the pit as pointed
out on my visit to the site on 5-11-72. Even though
there are only about 1000 feet Involved at this time, the
some method would work for the remaining areas when It
Is feasible to stabilize them.
Reshape the slope to approximately 1J to 1, In this case
It can be done by working the loose spoil from the adjoln-
Ing overburden pile over the edge to a self obtained slope.
Fertilize according to soil test recommended by the N. C.
Department of Agriculture. .
dcast e mixture of Serlcea Leapedeza (scarified) 40
bs,l Weeping Lovegrass, 4 lbs. and Common Bermudagrass,
Alhulled)
5 lbs. per acre during the months of March or
April. Immediately after seeding, mulch the side slopes
with a suitable material. This mixture will provide a good
border of food and cover for wildlife. The grass will become
established much quicker if during the establishment period
for the first summer, nitrogen is broadcast at the rate of
40 lbs. of N per acre every 4weeks until the grass is
established. Maintain the stand by fertilizing as recom-
mended by the N, C, Department of Agriculture soil tea t�
Additional screening Is needed along N. C, secondary road
1002, This can be accomplished with 4 rows of loblolly
pine set about six feet apart in the rows with the rows
ten feet apart. One row of Glossy Privet in front of the .
pines will provide a tight screen after the pines are up
where you can see through them. Set the privet plants about..
6 to 8 feet sport. There are many other plants that could
be used as well as the Glossy Privet, such as 3 rows of

pc r;2sq ne asjT Ei2 FPe 'CTcazx bLTnn.F' ancP f12 3 LOi:2 C ,
f Fa fl LeGP frn%;;P ',UGLG ssLG VVUYL OPPCL bT�04a pi"t z cogTo ..
MPGLP, Aan CilU 2!G Fpzot:16.1 ^ sm.• f�r,F'FNc nzrnaF �jflUna fl�17{:"
n7uca sITTj ULanTcc n gT.iWf ^.r:Le,GU 111,,geL lPG BTUsa fizG I '
PGu ;Geg s:iemp• � Lout oz. rjazaA ':z7nsc xv Lzr,A)F o;, gPP '
., ling fiFon." aTxv L•'c+g an^5.77u .Pc Lone MTFP FPc ..V!42
T u.T s' RISE CSU Fe FTCGP1n S41 RTpP ,t LOiAa C TCP.-I OTT`
UgTPTOUs77 aC1.ofOTL'R T2' UGGg6q vjafA :^' C.' 26CaJ({frLA. zonq
;cugsg p'., F:is ;�snfltcr•svr bL trGLTc;r,�r.Lc aoT7 Fe2g•
GagrrP772Pcc• ',:v7vPPTJ PI)s a. F.fluR pR LeLPTTTsiUt� Fr2 Lcn,,_
t;0 1p2• oz ;+ usi f;cLP 'GnsL1, .i, .xc Gl!e Mii;TT PPG H1.ve2 T2
Ln: =Pc L.'LeF en.'mGL' UTPI.OecmU Ta PLaur-,asl-up sip FF•- LriP• OL
Ge PnpTTPPVf! --jlTi -,COL TF, gnLTUe P}rG E:. PPP7Tst PrPr, •_P :)r::-oo
P=•;•aGL CL LUrg ;)Lg UCAOL Laa xTjg;,rTT,G• ':PG 'Y,xsr: s :4T3T r`r calac
XTCU IT 2nTP:•nrr, :n,^>=.'rrT' SPTU MTXPnLG Ur- T nLOAT:ic r:
.)c.--j • T;Jarg7eiPcTX gyro:, 2ccgTuV XnTOV CPP aTr{a GTODGe
fs• T7c^-1 ? i nGL VOLG cnzTv9. gNG WOUFPd OL f+;..CJ OL
i'OAt;liLt3Ee4 it IP-• ftva? r,GMlca ....... ^.(iP.:,;.`.SRL'•
-lLof)Jcfl2P sl :J:TX:'Lai Oy '. GL' vti +�2nGgCEn 7P. GU-; y7i„^,1 j
r.Gos LP:vrw; r. Oy t: a:.Tc:;7 Pnzc•.
c.r,:,P77i;G VCcoLcxva CO 3073' -,2P PA ?PG _
Tull cnGLPnLgsU cT7o anGL ry.C. GUF-s ,:a acTL OPPu;ricg ZTab..•
P CflJ PG qO;G Cl_ .'OLiiTA'." CPG TCO2(. C:UOTT 4)1. ng+OTU-
$d'eJE'Lfi PrtG E,TOn.. C S�-:CLL:ti-'Uf -Ej }� 7:: _a T'
]'2 LGfl27pTc Co ar't!p7 jTSP UGa!
)r,-.uEPpO^y i:otrj; i+,a L;c Lcx. CPG LGa;[quTU% f+Lcra Rjju:d Tg .
F;.GLo ULO OUT'A f+oon^ i000 r;;C tvnOTneq SIC gPT2 ,^]Wr.• FPf�
or.r oU WA nTeTF Po eT+G e-Ti-iS' -ACU 11Pou°rP
o: c. oy <Tqs ;;TO»P» +tIoL,: ,^PG Gg+sc a;,. ,PPG oTP fi2 POTOgoq
}:einG gpG yor,cx:. , :rtte2.,�«'ace. LOL ^_..e:)TT7t7"Ut; cpG
orrp:r,OT:i ;Gc.rnmFr+^: Uxt pj s:V
ygGffT (.`stoup
}IfiZZA t;JCLE;Aa -
.402, Tr• JZSS
_6Ugo —e,GM 'FiwianGL r10LIE _^UTr' 'PDX $-tto" _f!?`nr!W

t �
Page 2
Mr. Harry Andrews
Bicolor Lespedeza, which would provide a wildlife border.
I am working on trying to come up with some answer to the
best way to stabilize the areas where kiln dust has been
deposited. As soon as I have some suggestions on this,
I will be in touch with you.
Sincerely,
G. Samuel Cox
District Conservationist
GSC/lh

'LOi7LL @'it 1. 1.=. fi J�-':V?"O a`.•.�. ._. � -. .. 'SC. .. _.
rdd o7 7.tt.^.Cp e c J.Pa ou ;Nc)j :3 Ju.1- -if 7.I1Jk7011 ;f)
"r'4f:1 1 , 171fl:V 2L'J^„ Ir, of V.o+f j"OV
. �.CO:Y .. GGp i78 J;.a.� 'Yfi� .. _ .•6 Y..oN. ^R .b9 tJ 3UQ !':
�;J,3T 0:11
r

Maps
1. Two copies of the county highway maps and two copies of mine maps should be
submitted with each permit application. Mine Map Xcc- 1259 with status
as of 7/1/72 are attached.
County h'i hway ma s may be obtained from: By memo, Mr. J. Craig McKenzie,
State mining �ngineer, advised the county highway maps on file
with ! dea i t s regjAtina t[iLqQri0n1969 , need not be duplicated.
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Maps for each county are available for $0.15 each plus 4% sales tax. Make
checks payable to the North Carolina State Highway Commission.
Mark clearly the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
2. Mine maps should be accurate drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged topo-
graphic maps of the mine area and of a scale sufficient to clearly show the
following:
a. Property lines or affected area of mining operation
b, Outline of pits
c„ Outline of stockpile areas Considered part of processing plant.
d. Outline of overburden disposal areas
eo Location of processing plants (processing plants may be described as to
location and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed)
f. Location and name of streams and lakes
g. Outline of settling ponds
h. Location of access roads
i. Map legend
1. Name of company
2_ Name of mine
31 North arrow
4, County
5. Sca le
6, Bate prepared
7� Name and title of person preparing map
The mine maps should be correlated with the reclamation plan. The approximate
areas to be mined during the life.of the permit should be clearly marked.
If reclamation is to be accomplished concurrently with mining then show seg-
ments that are to be mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit.
Add drawings showing typical sections or cross sections and layout of proposed
reclamation where such drawings will assist in describing your reclamation,

t

DIVISION U!R IDEAL 13ASEC INDUarlirv:H, Irv(,
�l®off
?03i CCFICE 6Jx lil
CASTLE HAVNE. NORTH CAROLINA 23420
The Castle I-Iayne Plant of the Ideal Cement Company, '
Division of Ideal Basic Industries, is pleased to announce the
appointment of a new Plant Manager.
r _
Mr. Robert C. Cristelli ;
Ideal Cement Company ♦ �,
P. O. Box 74l
Castle Hayes, North Carolina 28429 ,
Phone: [phone]
Listed below are our'D'epartment Heads which may be
of interest to your office:
William H, Lower, Assistant Plant Manager
Albert L. Simon, Administrative Assi sta nC
Robert W. Pyles, Maintenance Supervisor .
Robert D. Blackburn, Production Supervisor
r I hope that this will be of assistance to your office and
would, appreciate your making the necessary changes to update
your referral lists.
Sincerely,
2. T. Neis on,
Regional Production Manager
RTN:ma

if
North Carolina Department of Natural
W Resources &Community Development
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
August 12, 1981
Mr. Paul E. Thomsen
Properties Engineer
Ideal Basic Industries
P. 0. Box 1949
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
Dear Mr. Thomsen:
DIVISION OF
LAND RESOURCES
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Box 27687, nebyh 27611
Telephone 919 7n W33
Your letters of July 30 and August 6, 1981 have been
referred to my office since I routinely handle mining permits.
As you might imagine, clarifications andamendments have
been made to The Mining Act of 1971 and to mining permits
since the initial issuing of permits in 1972. I am enclosing
a copy of the recently amended Mining Act. The permitting
regulations are subject to change due to the 1981 amendments
(also enclosed).
To answer your specific questions on set backs, no
statutory limit has been set. Each permit is evaluated
individually. However, I can give you these guidelines
on set backs:
1. Rivers, streams, other watercourses or wetlands -
set back must be sufficient to prevent encroachment
of the integrity of the watercourse and to prevent
offsite sedimentation into the watercourse. A
minimum of 50 foot wide buffer has been required
in some cases, but each site must be evaluated.
Property lines -buffer from excavation should be
adequate to allow grading of the required slope
(normally 3 horizontal to 1 vertical in coastal
sands) with a reasonable buffer left.
Geological Survey Saetion-73324231 Goodaile Survaµ Suction-7333838: Land Oualtly Section-7334574; Planning are InWmpry Seedon-7333833:
Lantl Reaourcei Information gvAo —7aj.I o
„ An Eel Opportunity A/lunnariv4. Action Employer

7
Mr. Paul E. Thomsen
August 12, 1981
Page 2
Public roads, railroads, right of ways -same as
number 2 with the provisions that additional buffer
may be required if needed' for safety and that visual
screening from public view may be required along
public access.
I will be happy to discuss any additional questions you
may have on your particular project.
JDS:pg
cc: Gerald Kraynak
ames D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P.E.
Mining Specialist
r

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Date /�O 191/—
To: /-
Remarks:
ACTION
Note and file
❑ Note, Initial and forward
❑ Note and return to me
❑ Your comments, please
❑ Note and see me about this
❑ For your Information
[� For your approval
❑ Prepare reply for my slpnature
Per our converaatlon
0 Prepare Information for the to reply
C3 Per your requeu
❑ Please answer, with copy to me
f]_ Return with more details
II_ To be filed

IMPORTANT
To
Dale Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
PhoARE' CODE NUMBER EXTENStON
Message
Signed
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WILL CALLAGAIN
WANTS i0 SEE YpV
URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
N. C. Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Oaeloemcnt

Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
August 6, 1981
North Carolina .Department of
Natural Resources and. .Community
Development
Division of Land Resources
Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Attn.: Charles W. Gardner
Dear Mr. Gardner:
Exploration Depadment
PO. Box 1949
Fod Collins. Colorado 80522
303 482 5603
303 482 5608
DEAw
\&
a I
AUG i u 1081
1AND QUALITY�w1 N
I wish to clarify my .letter of July 30, 1981
requesting .quarrying and .reclamation criteria.
This office is assembling information for a new
10-year permit application for .our Castle Hayne,
North Carolina quarry and specifically wanted to
know of any changes in the regulations, rules or
practices in recent years. The .regulations file
in this office may be out of date. In particular,
setback distances for the quarry are being re-
studied.
Sincerely,
P. E. Thomsen
Properties Engineer
PET:iem

Ideal Basic Industries
--o,�pSgl Cement Division
I" 0 RoBOPlbnDePamen
f1PO. Box t9R9
Alin 3 1981 Fon Colin. Colwaao 8os22
303 482 5603
303 482 5W5
WD QUALITY. SECTION
July 30, 1981 IDEAL
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Conmtunity Devolpment
Division of Land Resources
Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Mr. Charles W. Gardner
Dear Mr. Gardner:
Re: Quarrying and Reclamation Criteria
In reviewing Ideal's Castle Hayne plans, I find no current
North Carolina Quarrying or Reclamation Criteria in our
files. Please send me a copy of any applicable criteria.
I would also like to know if there are any setback restric-
tions from property lines, public roads or waterways.
Sincerely,
(1P 2. a
Paul E. Thomsen
Properties Engineer
PET: j ep

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources S Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
ANNUAL RE CLAMAT I ON REPO RT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1980
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine Castle Hayne Quarry Permit. Number 65-3
County New Hanover Telephone [phone]
Name of Company ' IdealBasicIndustries, 'Inc., Cement Division `—
Mailing Address P.O. Box 741, Castle Payne, NC 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months. Totals to 1981
(a) Tailings ponds Acres 144 Plant Refuse & Ponds
(b) Stockpiles Acres 130 Plant, Stockpiles-, roads, Etc.
(c) Waste Piles Acres 49 Perimeter Overburden Piles
(d) Mine Excavation 12 Acres 184 Limestone and/or Clay
TOTAL 12 Acres 507 TOTAL
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. Est. 12 Ac. area
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control: r which clay was previously rced
The overburden material is a sandy clay that revegetates naturally in a short tim
to help reduce normal erosion. About 93% of the surface disturbed quarry areas
drain or accurailate into the below sea level muarm Plant precipitation refuse
is also pwrped into the ouarry Clear water from the 4„a= ones to a f nAl
clarification pond and receives further treatment before entering the Northeast
Cape Fear river.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine
Excavation
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
7
Areas comprising about 12 acres of previous perimeter spoil piles were graded
during 1979. These areas were not seeded as they are not considered to be
final graded or continue as roadway or operating area. Continuing deposit of
precipitator refuse will eventually fill portions of the below natural drainage
quarry created by recmval of clay and limestone. Overburden spoil can then be
spread as soil prior to seeding. As the volume of clay and limestone exceeds
refuse somie areas can only become future lakes as previously reported.
Areas where limestone will be remnved during the next few years (an average of
about 12 acres per year) will be frmm acres previously affected by clay rearwal
or roadway.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation &!�/'� %. �o �
Title P,�/yF PIMA46/2
Date 1-30 - 91
Complete and return to:
Land.Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.

- - - -------__ .--
- - Jif V.M- Yl ,.�� /j. ..a J /��jH "-).Y/� a'./�"_..��.,.1 b�__ ,.. .s Oli•�f / _.. -_�{.. —
�.,�d
_-gPPa P"j 2w"- ssa>04c/ H.L __.Voii. a we/oaJ—
.. PBSI f-�.ol+-.:o--•�-i.,u+ ryf- { an,_id/-- ! � r �.yo�— j-a--
-
— -- — — — o

i
..•
JIa
t
.a
1
�
.,a
-
,
e
y✓
OF I
e
-
s
r'

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural. Resources & Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I 0 N R E P O R T 1-15-79
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation,
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department's mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5B.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine CASTLE BAYNE QUARRY Permit Number 65-3
County NEW HANOVER Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC,, Cement Division
Mailing Address P.O.BDx 741, Castle Hayne, North Carolina 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
since the last report in Sept
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining 2txXk=xkX=xzbs.
Clarification Totals to 1979
(a) Zlotl= 9 ponds 0 Acres 83 an�1P tie& Quarry Pimping
(b) Stock irden 0 - Acres 130 Plant, Beads, Ditches, Stock-
(c)
0 Acres 49 Overburden ( piles, et
(d) Mine Excavation 5 Acres 223 Limestone and/or clay
TOTAL 5 Acres 485
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 25
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
Most surface drainage is into the below sea level quarry. Water from the quarry.is
ptmiped in and out of clarification ponds. The sandy clay overburden which is temporarily
piled around a small portion of the quarry perimeter revegetates rapidly to control erosion.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) 'Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine 0
Excavation Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Most mined -out areas will become future clarification pond area as practical.
As previously reported, the Castle Hayne quarry will remain active for several years.
Reclamation has been confined to small areas or temporary vegetation on overburden
areas that will likely be regraded or become lake area in final reclamation.
7. Comments: Limestone (marl) removal started into the triangular 28-acre area in a
south portion of the quarry in late 1978. This is the area indicated for
future quarry on the revised map xcc-1377 furnished with the last report
(September 1977). blap xcc-1377 was prepared from 1977 aerial photography
and should be adequate through 1980 or 1981.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation I
Title A. L, Simon, Plant Manager
Date January 19, 1979 1
Complete and return to:
Na�1a3S AlINnD aNb"I
Land Quality Section sgmanrs3H ao 'AM
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development �i1J� �G 9 OF
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 CMM3032

4
II
A I North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
February 14, 1978
Mr. Robert E. Marsh
Properties Manager
Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
P. 0. Box 1949
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Dear Mr. Marsh:
Thank you for your recent letter.
Enclosed are copies of information sent to all mining operators in
North Carolina. A blank Annual Reclamation Report was attached to this
information and sent to your Castle Hayne operation in error on
February 13. This report was in fact received from your mine operator
,on September 20, 1977. Therefore, you are correct in assuming that it
will not be necessary to submit another report until February 1, 1979.
I appreciate your inquiry and for calling this matter to my
attention. A copy of this letter will also be sent to your plant manager
at the mine operation.
CHG:chl
cc: Mr. A. L. Simon
Yours very truly,
Charles H. Gardner, Chief
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
An Equal QPMMUnity Affirmative Action Employer

L
Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
FF6 0 j'lu
DIV. C: L ._.:. - -
LL.':: CJA.1Iv p_CI:�N
Exploration Department
P.O. Boa M9
Fort Collins, Colorado 60521
303 462 5600
February 1, 1978 'DE&
Mr. Charles H. Gardner, Chief
Land Quality Section
P.O.Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Dear Mr. Gardner:
We would appreciate a copy of regulations resulting
from a hearing held November 14, 1977 concerning
amendments to Mined Land Regulation Title 15, NCAC
Chapter 5. It is presumed copy of the revised
regulations will fully explain the transition?
As an example, those operations that reported. September 1977
may not be required to report again until early 1979 inorder
to comply with a new annual report due date.
Sincerely,
Robert E.Marsh
Properties Manager
REM:iem

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
All affected land is active or will become future clarification ponds.
As previously reported, the Castle Hayne quarry will.remain active for
several years before it will be practical to isolate any areas for per-
manent reclamation.
7. Comments:
The Castle Hayne quarry was photographed in March 1977 for mapping purposes.
Attached is Map No. xec-1377 with affected lands outlined by color code to
indicate current _Item 2 designations:. Item 2(:ti) (130 'acres: current total)
includes 30 acres of active roads and drainage ditches not outlined in blue
on the map. This 130-acre affected area includes plant operations, active
stockpiling, roads, drainage ditches, etc. not otherwise designated.
Only 2 acres, is estimated "new acreage to be affected during the next 12
months" as limestone removal will likely be limited to areas previously
disturbed to remove clay. About 50'acresof limestone remains under and
adjacent to the 28 acres marked as "to be.quarried starting in 1978."
It is evident quarry operation priorto1982 will not involve as much of
the area estimated as previously marked on map xec-1259. Some of this is
due to a decision to open the :eouthwesterly quarry not anticipated in 1972•
Please note on drawing ace-1377, all elevations preceded by (-) are below
sea level:
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title rc09NA1:10Z
Date 9•
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 2762.1

ff ILr'' of rl/zo�'7'7
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT" 911112-77
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971" '
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE QUARRY Permit Number 65=3
County NEW HANOVER Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC., CEMENT DIVISION
Mailing Address P•O.BOX-741,_ CASTLE'HAYNE, NORTH CAROLINA 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate data of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
Clarification - Totals
(a) TK=tKff9 ponds 47 Acres -U7Fiant Refuse & Quarry Pumping
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres 13C Plant,Roads, 'Ditches, Stockpiles,
Ove b rden - etc.
(c) );tlgg4,iles -(6) Acres 49 Disturbed by overburden placement
(d) Mine Excavation -(34) Acres 218 Limestone and/or Clay
TOTAL 7 Acres 480
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 2
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
Area.(c) above includes only overburden placed on previously +disturbed' land
(outlined in green on the attached map xcc-1377). This sandy clay material
revegetates naturally to help control erosion. Storm runoff from a large
portion of this 49-acre area flows to the quarry, as does all runoff from
overburden placed in mined out areas. All drainage into the quarry passes
through clarification ponds prior to discharge into streams.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles
I
Acres (d) Mine Excavation D Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

T; y Ideal Basic Industries
Cement Division
Castle Hayne Plant
P.O. Box 741
Castle Hayne. North Carolina 28429
919 6752264
September 15, 1976
Mr. J. Craig McKenzie, Chief
Land Quality Section
N. C. Department of Natural & Economic Resources
Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
Attached are the 1975-1976 Annual Reclamation Report for Ideal
Basic Industries Castle Hayne Quarry.
If additional information is needed, please advise.
Sincerely,
R. C. Cristelli,
Plant Manager
R CC:ma

.,
',
r
.�
i'
n.
f' �
e'
a_ �n 7 � ' .
... �.,
� Vf , .
J :V 1 `_
~ 1 It
i � , �•
f
�.:i r
4
• �
1 _ ` iY ; LI 4
. [n a � _
N. � fi � � �

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office.of Earth Resources _
-' Mining Division - '
A N N U A L R1E C L A M A T I 0 N- R E P 0'11 T -�
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department,. and eachiyear
thereafter until reclamation 3s completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities comppreceding year on a completed during the precediform prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55- , '"The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE QUARRY Permit Number 65-3
County INEW,HANOVER - •d Telephone "[phone]--
Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC., CEMENT DIVISIONS '
Mailing Address P.O.Box 741, Castle Hayne, N. C. 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
,e�tl s
g
fift t l g ponds 20 Acres
i
(b) Stockpiles
(c) Agfc�b pYIgs
(d) Mine Excavation
0 Acres
-(18) Acres
4
Acres
TOTAL 6 Acres
See additional explanations on attached sheet.
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
10
Enlarged settling ponds. --See attached sheet for other Information.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings Ponds
0
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
0
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
0
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
0
Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Affected areas are active and any extensive reclamation will not be
practical until mining is completed on a large segment of the property.
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
It appears the Castle Hayne quarry will remain active for many years
before it will be practical to isolate any area of the below sea level
quarry for reclamation to a natural lake as previously indicated.
See attached sheet and the original permit application for further
information.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation /`�
`title Plant Manager
Date September 15, 1976
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. o. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
(,

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERMIT N65-3
9/3/76
The .four categories of affected land as given in the "Annual
'Reclamation Report," 2(a) Tailings Ponds, 2(b) Stockpiles, 2(c) Waste
Piles., and 2(d) Mine excavation, are basic to a correct interpretation
of multiple long range activities and conditions peculiar to the Castle
Hayne quarry, Several years experience under North Carolina and other
state regulations bring the realization of a need for better explana-
tions of categories to improve Ideal's planning and reporting of act-
ivities. More precise explanations may also be helpful to those who
must interpret general regulations to this specific operation.
`•�,':% 2(a) Ponds for clarification of discharge water currently occupy.
�,.36 acres of depleted quarry. Two pond expansions added 20 acres to the.
7.16 acmes originally reported. The 20 acres reported as new settling., '
'pond has been subtracted from mine excavation area. As the ponds
.have an important long time use, future expansions will be reported.
;..;: promptly.
It 'is anticipated that. as .settling ponds fill with solids, they
can be covered with overburdenand revegetated to provide useful _
lakeside areas,
2(b) In'1972, open material stockpiles were within the 80 acres
,.designated as processing plant. The 1972-73 annual report indicated
"3 acres newly disturbed for quarry material stockpiling which remains
.- .'the current total in this -category,
2(c) Areas first affected by piling overburden or providing
access roadways on and i..^,curbed ground have becrr classified under waste
piles. A large pnrti.on of these pi.l es have already been r•ehandLed to
permit, excavation of limestone, graded in place for access roadways or
moved for pond dikes or other roadways.
This category, now more accurately designated as "Overburden Piles,"
currently occupies about 55 acres. An entry of (-18) acres has been
mnde in order 1;o update the previous 73 acre total., Overburden is a
candy soil. ou which a temporary natural. revo Co Calton controls erosion.
It, nppcar I',he CanGLe Ilayno quarry will rem:, hi nt•.I'.ive for many ycnru
bel'ore it will be p'acLia:.il to isol.abe any area o1' the below sea level
quarry for final reclamation. '
2(d) Overburden that can be placed directly in depleted quarry
cnts will continue to be carried in the "Mine Excavation" category.
Ridges of overburden, in depleted quarry cuts, that will be above
an eventual natural lake level will be graded down later. Several
years of natural settlement is helpful. to safely support heavy grading
'equipment.
As clay lenses overlie limestone, the past practice of reporting
clay excavation as a separate acreage figure has apparentl.^y contributed
nothing but cunfusion. Clay and limestone exouviiLlon will be combined
i.0 future reporting. Th:l.r: entegory currcul.l. ,y Lo'I:al.s 2^2 acres.
1nce 1.973 escavation:.t into the depleted quarry floor has been
conducted to provide a crushed material suitable for road topping.
This minor operation will further delay isolation of the first quarry
area for reclamation.

June 15, 1976
Mr. R. C. Cristelli
Ideal Cement Company
P. 0. Box 741
Castle Hayne, N. C. 28429
Dear Mr. Cristelli:
This is to acknowledge receipt of the map indicating what condition the
l� Ideal Cement•Quarry would be left in the event of abandonment or upon comple-
tion of mining. The development of the Leisure Lake Marina will adequately
comply with the provisions set forth in your mining permit.
The conservation practices and reclamation activities noted on my,
inspection of April 26, 1976, were found to be adequate and in accordance
with the provision set forth in your mining permit.
Although very little in the way of reclamation was noted during the
inspection the drawing,you submitted indicating final reclamation will
adequately meet the requirement of a time schedule.
Sincerely,
Gerald J, Kraynak
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
GJK:cb

-
��
.
,,
,,
,.
l
��

N09 3
INSPECTION REPORT�l
Compo::y-: �ii�saL l..Er" .ii � County:
Mir..,:'I�LC Ayri4 /YN6 Permit
Dale Inspected: C, a& 1971� Date of last,inspectior..
Prodc:t: Mdr�_ _-_ Person Contacted:
1. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Control.:.( Z?dn2 6 4RIL p.r Dl,PAr7ew /,V 7rtetu.1 -a-ri[
6- Waste Disposal: �id.�/?i�c-O�.J C�.9ST 1�/ltvr i,rlro Fri rPfc�
II. Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS:
�� / v i 1 �/ 'a /!!•i► /O�
d/1%
DefiGxency letter needed Letter Sent _ Reinspection Needed_,_

D l51� of �,N1`T Oo�.r� Y
DIVIStION OF IDEAL. BASIC INDLISTNIES. INC;.
TRADE 1 ) MARK
POST OFFICE BOX 741
CASTLE HAYNE. NORTH CAROLINA 28429
May 29, 1972
.Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina
Attention: Mr. Gerald J. Kraynak
Dear Mr. Kraynak:
The opportunity to visit with you during your recent inspection of Ideals
Castle Hayne quarry and discuss reclamation plans appear to have been
beneficial to both parties. Your favorable comments concerning the
manner in which our -application for mining permit was prepared, is
appreciated.
Ideal favors practical environmental considerations and finds it's long-
term mining operations in relatively small isolated areas to be generally
compatable with the principals of regulation by governmental units. The
wording of North Carolina's Act is especially commendable as given under
Section 2, "Findings" and Section 3, "Purposes". The principles brought
out by these sections and early reclamation efforts discussed with you,
seem to involve interim or temporary work. Usefullness and productivity
of any temporary reclamation would be some different than eventual
permanent work.
Ideal's Central Exploration Department is instrumental in coordination of
basic operation methods and compliance with reclamation regulations. This
Department has reviewed the application and reclamation plan changes dis-
cussed with you.

- - x
Application item C-1 has been altered by reference to revisions in
reclamation plant questions 1, 8, 10, and 11 changes. These changes
give more detailed information on the unusual operation, long range re-
clamation plan, and statements as you indicated desirable. Past
experience seems to verify the disadvantages of disturbing the natural
revegetation on old overburden piles for elaborate grass plantings that
would involve more of a fire hazard on temporary slopes.
Attached is a recommended plan from the local Soil Conservation Service,
which appears to be satisfactory for eventual permanent reclamation. ,
This type of detailed specifications would be most applicable if reviewed
in the light of conditions and use at the time permanent reclamation is
to be accomplished.
Ideal looks forward to working with the Mining Division and other groups
of the Earth Resources Department on any problems that should develop.
HWA:ma
Attachment
Sincerely,
Harry W Andrews, Plant Manager

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on anarea under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
.such later date as may be provided.by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971" r
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE PLANT Permit Number 65-3
County
NEW HANOVER Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, CEMENT DIVISION
Mailing Address P.D.BOX 741, CASTLE HAYNE, NORTH CAROLINA 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
Limestone 0
(d) Mine Excavations Clay S Acres
TOTAL
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 20
It is anticipated that clay will come from previously disturbed area; approx. acres
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control. will he newly disturbed to expose limestone.
The 27-acre settling pond continues to receive all plant and quarry area water dis-
charges. Natural revegetation of the temporary piles of sandy olay overburdan reduoes
erosion. Approximately 90 percent of the surface of the overburden piles drain into
the below sea level quarry to be pumped with other drainage into the settling pond.
Deoant from the settling pond flows to the Northeast Cape Fear River. We feel this
system prevents sediment from reaohing natural streams.
r,
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds (Active) 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles(Aoti
(b) Stockpiles (Active) 0 Acres (d) Mine Excavation(
.(Continued on reverse side)

6, Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months. .
Excavation of a quarry floor material more suitable for road con-
struction has improved access, operations, and the overall appearance.
Progress of the eventual reclamation plan to form useful lake areas
is not possible until sections can be isolated. As operations permit,
dikes will be provided at higher elevations for isolation and -enlarge-
ment of settling ponds to permit more efficient handling of drainage water.
- --._Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Plant Manager,
Date September 8, 1975
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

LNSPECTED BY.: Ja.ne5 NO.
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: =a,6>o/���� �nY�("a
Mine: &J//e />'e4e /Y/ii�P _ Permit NumGer':4y'-3_____.___
Date Inspected: /2-12-74 Date of last inspection.: /-23-74
Pro&,t: Aori ZZE GPlnenij _ Person
1. Remarks - Measures Taken
A, Erosion Control:_ /_ir., c�-P Jn �nrnn%in mlwy or�nn�oi1 _
Af� •f �In.r .tvu� ° ria4- LL7 .�ezx-dam
B. Waste Disposal:
C, Reclamation: �n .% J),IA s 11,5nri wo ej?er �D, Q/ so
�iinY iinryr �i �'ar Lnpic GP �s%6/.s_�I __,__
II- Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
RECOMMENDATIONS A. COMMENTS:: / _ZA �4al ,e%once
—__ 1—rC6P/l7 J77ill inu /JrnfJn� /!ON`M%H( �P1S yfo/n Gl In/nj� jf019 _.___.,
Deficiency letter needed Letter Sent /a-Aa- 7T Reinspection Needed_

Pee,
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved,. the operator shall files report of
activities completed during the preceding year,on a farm prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE PLANT
County
NEW HANOVER-
_ Permit Number 65-3
Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Ideal Basic Industries, Cement Division
Mailing Address P.O.Box 741, Castle Hayne, North Carolina 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date '
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
10-acre expansion 1973-74 was
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres into previously disturbed area(ls)
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
22 limestone * Adjusted to bring reported clay
(d) Mine Excavation 15 clay* 37 Acres §� di9toly rbaedetrriv tototalsates.
TOTAL 37 Acres SS
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 6 ac. clay
Limestone will be from areas previously reported as piled over urden.
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
A settling pond is utilized to prevent solids from entering the northeast
Cape Fear river. Natural revegetation of temporary overburden pile areas
(sandy clay) helps to control any erosion of that material.
5. indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds
(b) Stockpiles
Active 0
Active 0
Acres (c)
Waste Piles -graded
6
Acres
Acres (d)
Mine Excavation
0
Acres
(Continued
on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
The long-range reclamation plan to provide lake areas when.dewatering
pumping is stopped, gives little opportunity for concurrent reclamation.
Clay,excavation areas overlie future limestone deposits. -
Some work was accomplished during the 1973-74 report year in grading
overburden piles not likely to be redisturbed in the future. Grass was
planted on a 3-acre area reported as ready for planting last year.
A pile of..dredged material near the river, as indicated on a previous
drawing, is being used for7road and -dike f.ill.•
Sigriature of person responsible for reclamation
R. C. Cristelli
Title Plant NUna er
Date September 19, 1974
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Sox 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

INSPECTED BY: �rr_-
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: /�I l F )eAG "eAJ T ( DIYPAN ✓ Ccunty!.__AZN1�JL�_
Mine: ! "ASTLh HAYII�/_= / /iNJt Permit Number: (�.S
Date Inspected: d_A�AJ ,23 r/i75l Date of last inspection:
Product: MAQ/ �FO/2 rl-F A17' Person Ccntacted:_�Q.
1. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Controlo NAJY .C�it/J) ALA .S/i7Jy(_/Y141//A Rl= JAJ.T"Cw�_/jL
771 /: M7A Jr
B. Waste Disposal: 0(/) F,Y A✓AT-=/) EJ,?,t19.T DA/_A/ S-zDd n
'4�yJ6/ic
C. Reclamation: hr In A/drA S" r7f T EAti_Qr%/J.A/t/T' A'I=
1A! �22/ r<; - OP RrLAJI &C/AJM of
IIe Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
RECOMMENDATIONSE l i A r a
P'a ez77)
• •C
rl9il
i<1rr
Deficiency letter needed Letter Sent /`AY` 74 Reinspection Needed___,

E1303 C QU- TT 2T GO „ PANY
DIVISION OF IDEAL BASIC IN13US`VI1IES. INC.
EXPLORATION DEPARTMENT
P. o. Box are 1949
FORT COLLINS, COLO. 80521
September 13, 1973
Mining Division
Department of Natural Resources
P.O.Box 27687
Rale.igh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Permit No. 65-3, Reclamation Report
Gentlemen:
Additional core drilling was performed in March 1973 to
help determine the eventual advance of the quarry to the
northeast in relation to the river and Island Creek.
Full evaluation of this information may require slight re-
vision of the 10-year future quarry expansion shown on
Map xcc-1259.
Map xcc-1259 (Rev. G) as submitted in 1972 remains appli-
cable to the attached report for the period ending August 21,
1973. Limestone excavation was principally from the area
centered at coordinates 106,500 N-S, and 57,500 E-W. Clay
excavation advanced into the area centered 103,500 N-S
and 59,400 E-W.
A small limestone stockpile addition to previously reported
plant operating area is near coordinates 105,400 N-S and
54,750 -W. Extra clay stockpiling has been found con-
venient near 105,500 N-S and 55,600 E-W. These comprise the
3 acres of new stockpiles reported.
Compliance experience with Mined Land Reclamation regula-
tions in North Carolina and other states has promoted better
techniques, coordination, and planning of operation that will
contribute to the overall economy of reclamation goals.
Sincerely,
REM: iem

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
. A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine CASTLE HAYNE PLANT Permit Number 65-3
County NEW HANOVER Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAL CEMENT COMPANY, DIVISION OF IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Mailing Address P.O.BOX 741, CASTLE HAYNE, NORTH CAROLINA 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
0
Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
3
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
9
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation 22 Ls.,)
29
Acres
ay
TOTAL
41
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 35
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control. As a precaution against any solids
entering the northeast Cape Fear River, water pumped from the below sea -
level quarry is discharged, into a settling pond. Natural revegetation
helps to abate any erosion problem from stripped material piled on
temporary perimeter, areas.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds Active 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles Active 0 Acres (d) Mine Excavation 3 Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
The long-range reclamation plan to provide lake areas gives little
opportunity for concurrent reclamation as previously reported.
About 3 nacres of excavated area adjacent to the haul road at the
_quarry has been filled and covered, ready for planting.
Some progress has been made in covering trash,and experimental'
plantings on inactive affected areas disturbed prior to 1972.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title _�.,qi✓Y,/ri9.d9yfr.�
Date 6; 7
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P, o. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

.;
Low
tl
�
�
4
i
lei
.m
e
y
I �
I
REVISION F REVISION E
naf
1_7
PLANT OPERATING AREAS, STOCKPILES, ROADS, DITCHES, ETC.
QUARRY EXCAVATION AREAS
AREA AFFECTED PRIOR TO 1971 ACT
OVERBURDEN DEPOSITED ON PREVIOUSLY UNDISTURBED LAND
REFUSE AREA & CLARIFI.CATION PONDS
ANTICIPATED FUTURE DISTURBANCE
p 500 IgoD 150o 2000 2500
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL I-) ARE, BELOW SEA LEVEL
PHOTOGRAPHY DATED MAR 1977
REVISION D REVISION C REVISION B REVISION A
LEGEND
x SPOT ELEVATIONS
Q SURVEY POINT BY IDEAL SURVEYORS
ROADS
----- TRAILS
EDGE OF WOODED AREA
—z—x— FENCE
— — — INTERMITTENT STREAM
PROPERTY yBOUNDARY,IDEAL
� y
CASTLE RAYNE QUARRY --PERMIT 65-3
LOCATION: 3 MILE ENE CASTLE HAYNE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
MARKINGS BY R. E. MARSH
PROPERTIES MANAGER 77-��
IDEAL CEMENT COMPANY
DIVISION OF IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES. INC.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENVER, COLORADO
ISSUE 'DRAWN ��F��//,�-'I_°°"""^^"�'
RAW MATERIAL SURVEY CHECKED A4 B 22-
QUARRY RESERVE AREA APPRDVED ./ , a z.,
SCALE I'=500"
CASTLE HAYNE PLANT X cc- 1377
c

/ I
)IJI V;—Cit
pj \ 0 F
LO
Cl
O )+ .� i„�f, o ',,'' O A', �£ > nor. pd�m �.
1 O0 did
u
�..: �I > - U
7 i " ,III
t :. I'I c7•
Ij
w
Q 0
m o Z o U¢ ,n
1 1 1 —o ?
_ X
7
+ Did
oz o u 2
Ip -� l� ..-o to w 0 Z z
to
¢ o In Q J -� CL f- ILL
¢F 0.. �,¢ �r-
.5��-Q O x to M u m /(
�1 �,I ��� = u1 w " on
vS�
mm
_ 1 I w ¢ W
h F—m z
I Za � w -E
did O LLJ o
G w
oUJ
m
0
V
f�.IIiIII�I(!� I�I�II /0
f/� it%N {il N /.
N rl y _
l `��
("
IIII r" 11 "I �'ll� I II IIII q Q o 63,G00 �� lid
e`F-
w
b L
and
III r1i
II II� 1
l li
J
�IlIll!yl1,k All
lq[ I vI I I JJ it III I l C �I'1 1 1111III{IIII�AH I IoI
it II 'l dI Ill lip
1 IIII I LII I lip,i
Y
plid
Df
o a ¢
i �� .� 9 SII'I III IIII' I II'� III �I�I III i .,,,� K >
I�I lh�j tll' 111 I,II I, 91 �' I+ _
n, Ill JIp hl�l f�l' I!' III dd, I �� /i "T J� rrl ac
X o a
er
it
� -!I
III ♦ J. 11
snl,000 I{Il�lll�li ----_��w`yv _ - --- - - --- i------- --. .-- --._� _. _ - 1 O
III
� � 70.
It , .�. I'I� vvv/,
iIIII 'if 11 I'LIaII mvv� _o
II i I13 I
IIII 'It
l 1 \V�V ; N 0 J
vvc' %v a
60,000 I�I I - - -- \ Nd did y i." /!/ _ - - w 1 O w �_' O a �, a
V- I. / W N J s ] c9
III i j — o ¢ oCy I
�f� liIhI{ I1'� IIII'' \ jl j/� "' ` o o Q x o a w¢ N Q m
�II�III�I i�llt /;! -/, 6 Q a Q
�� 5 0 o z 0 a w a o I�
191 I I� �I� ,-- 0< ¢ c N � tro a 0 7 f rl
w Q Z ¢I O Q ca
¢ a - z alma
D.
1I J w a Z w � > F- o
J P -
�� o � 3 6 ¢ <Q mo Q id- < w l -la
\\� x 7 z o 3 aa K I cn J V > Q J a Z w r
\ a, In n a to d F > > a ¢ O c,
1141IIII I_ 11 `'r
t N
d Illllldlf, III V N
a
w
_ —... ) - - _ R�CITV'RFRT R oad
m o -
ss,Voo Il�� hh
I I L.
/
✓ 4
llli
l�lll �.�
1�1� it11 d
I II l 1 �IIII�I M
b — --- = - --\� o i1 -- ry Pq
57.000 I� N l _ \
m
I II iilid� l IYII�I / 7 o r
''IIII IF
III �� w i ��7
I
�� III �Id t II i' / w G
I� + .k t D LL i
o x
99
<� > o
e a n
all'Ti,l�All
ro
z, o b \
�_
55,000 .. ----i --- _'L
I, I�I I IIII � ll �
I r 5
��ll�l���l Ile • - � I I I II i '
d i
' 111 I,II,hI'lII
Il ( p, 02 11
11 t
O \
I IIII ICI tr O II
�11I �I 1 I� O I
I-
54,000 III � Ili '7 � I _ - -_ �.--_ —_ - —.-
x t
�I IIII I(lII� I'II It
I I I (IIII ql',I
I �
It 11
i N I
v ^
,IIII Illl,ll�r�JIlllllld'il
IIII'14111i111��1 LL s bo IN "IMr `
d \ — -- s 53,000 - _- Id - -
I It a I f Im
I i1 I I
w
Q
' F Q I d o
o
V ^�
! if U m
vvv v I
N Ill � III Ii I�A
111 ( !
�----�_-
3IJIj� It AA\
A
I 1\
II
Z
I�
h I I I I
did
51�000 - A q �l \ / iII i \ +
If
/i \
I II li 11 l III' IIII IIII �I'I��iI II \ / / AVA
IIII ° �111I ' ,� \\ // \\ c1
�'
\ 1 d ,II II Ills IfIAIIIII II h dI�Ifll �,I'��, \\�
I I I � i• '
r [itvvv
L. — — \\\�
l
s 1 11 II� I
!IIII i� Z
�- - v 50,000 - - — - - ----I�\_ r6 - - ---�
� I
I
I —
p J \
�IrbM�I \ r
I� .I I lid
i�l -' a IIII+ �yl i' $d J
III ll� �'I I�'I ilIIII� I� III 00� vvvv 0 T
Jill Ill ''lllil;l�l ,IIIdid
1t�
45000 �.r, �Iilr _'"i�; ',t �I - ---__ __-_ __ ��- _-_-___._- __- - _._.._- s
--� --- -
e=

V '
,
July 28, 1972
Mr. Larry Andrews
Ideal Cement Company
P. 0. Box 741
Castle Hayne, forth Carolina 28429
Dear Mr. Andreas:
I have carefully reviewed your application for a mining permit
for your Castle Rayne Plant. Your reclamation plan provides for the
eventual creation W a lake in the mine area.: I will expect that in the
future as excavations are made along the final perimeter of your mine
area, the banks of such excavations that witl.eventually be lake shore
will be sloped to a minimum of 1k:1 and stabilized with .vegetatiob at
the timo of excavation. Such aoti'on would constituto reclamation
simultaneously with mining and could be accomplished with your ncirmal
mining equipment.. -
Your application, including the reclamation plan, for the Castle
flayne Plant is hereby approved by the Department, subject to the above
stated conditions..
I am enclosing a form for your use in securing a Surety }Send in
the amount of twenty-five thousand t$25,000.D'D1 dollars, as required by
G.-S. 74.54. Please return the completed Bond as enecuted by your Surety.
Upon receipt of the Bond your Mining Permit will be issued.
Sincerely,
1
J. Craig McKenzie
_ State Mining Engineer
Mining Division
JCM:elm
Enclosure

�I SL N �J�2Tc� �,G Co) l�:i YEN
DIv1!$ION Or IDEAL BASIC INDUS'I'IiIFSI. INC.
Qp,FI_TLgh�
TRADE (- MARK
C MENT
POST OFFICE BOX 741
CASTLE HAYNE. NORTH CAROLINA 28429
March 27, 1972
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Officerof Earth Resources
Mining Division
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Gentlemen:
We are forwarding the original and one copy of application
for a mining permit in conjunction with the operation of our Castle
Rayne Plant in order that we may comply with "the mining act of
197111 State of North Carolina.
Sincerely,
3
Harry W Andrews,
Plant Manager
HWA:ma

�]) ASI. G l E `T COMPANY
PANY
O�ei;t-Pl�
rpaoc `
POST OFFICE BOX 741
CASTLE HAYNE. NORTH CAROLINA 28429
March 19, 1970
Mr. J. Craig McKenzie
State Mining Engineer
State of North Carolina
Department of Conservation and Development
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: The Mining Registration Act of 1969
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
The attached two copies of Application for Registration
of Mining Operations in the State of North Carolina are forwarded
for your review and action to secure the proper North Carolina
Registration Certificate for Ideal Cement Company's mining
operations. The necessary maps are included as requested.
Please forward a copy of the Registration Certificate
when issued to the writer's attention:
If further information is needed concerning this
application, please advise.
Sincerely,
J. W. Collier
Plant Manager
JWC:ma

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development
e Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I 0 N R E P O R T 1-22-80
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of
the permitted operation and within 30 days of completion or termination
of mining on an area under permit, file with the Department a mining
reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 513.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
Name of Mine CASTLE RAYNE QUARRY- - Permit Number 65-3
County NEW HA.NOVEP; Telephone [phone]
Name of Company IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES',INC. Cement Division
Mailing Address: P.O.eox 741, Castle Rayne, North Carolina 28429
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months Totala to 1960
(a) Clarification ponds +61 Acres - 144 Plant Refuse & Ponds
(b) Stockpiles - 0 Acres 130 Plant, Roads, Stockpiles
49 Overburden ( at
(c) Overburden. - --------..0'- Acres .1172 Limestone and/or clay
(d) Mine Excavation-+10-61 Acres 495 acres Total
TOTAL 10 ... Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months 18
(Mined -out area converted to clarification & refuse ponds during 1979 ( 1 acres
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control:
As previously reported, most surface drainage is into the below sea level
excavated quarry areas. Water is therefore pumped from the quarry and re-
fuse ponds for clarification and treatment before entering surface streams.
The perimeter overburden storage areas rapidly revegetate naturally to
control erosion of any drainage other than into the quarry .
Item 6 explains a start to grade these perimeter storage piles that
will not be moved in future quarry operation.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine Excava- 0 Acres
ties
-- CONTINUED ON SECOND SHEET --

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
About 12 acres were graded reasonably level with a bulldozer during
1979. This is a start toward grading and reclamation of pond or
overburden areas. Ideal's quarry map xec-1377 is scheduled for
updating by photogrammetric methods and will be available to outline
all areas with the 1980 report.
7. Remarks
Limestone and clay were removed during 1979 from about 10 acres of
an isolated 28-acre triangular area indicated on map xce-1377
furnished with the 1977 report. An approximate 4-year supply re-
-mains in this area, plus adjacent land from which clay only had
been removed in prior years.
About 61 acres previously reported as mine excavation was opened to
enlarge refuse settling and clarification pond areas during 1979.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title Plant Manager
Date: January 28, 1980
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
P.O.Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF MINING OPERATION
in the
STATE.OF NORTH CAROLINA
iyame of Mine-- N.C.-Division, Castle Hayne Plant
Company- Ideal Cement Company
Division of Ideal Basic industries; Inc.
Address- P . 0. Sox 741,
Castle Hayne, North Carolina-28429
Date- /f1/ H l /9 742
Signature
Title -

A. Description of the Company
1. Ownership
a. Company name -
Ideal Cement Company
Division of Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.
b. Home office mailing address-
821 Seventeenth Street
Denver
Colorado 80202
c. Telephone-
[phone]
d. Name and title of principal officers-
President--M. R. Shilling
Secretary—H. H. Nees
General Production Mgr. --John Relic, Jr.
(2)

State Department of
Conservation and Development
Office of Mining Engineer
Date
Attached .referred to:
Please note and file.
Please answer; with copy to me.
Please prepare reply for my signature.
Please handle this.
For your information.
Your comments, please.
REMAR-KS:

e. Name and title of person authorized to represent
the company relative to registration-
M f 4 „d r t'V.$ Jf . —W . C o-1-1-i-e-r , Plant Manager
R. P. Comstock, Director of Exploration
f. Local mine name -
Castle Hayne
g. County in which mine is located -
New Hanover
h. Number of acres owned by operating company-
2,979
i. Number of acres leased by operating company -
None
J. Local manager-
,. W. Collier
k. Local office mailing address-
P. 0. Box 741
1. Telephone-
1 ?0 [phone]
2. Number of employees -
Estimated for mine or quarry only--20.
3. Ores or materials being mined -
Limestone and clay
.4. Mining activities -
a. Year mining originally began-
1963
b. Year mining began by present operating company-
1963
c. Estimated life of mine-
100 years
d. Total acres mined to date-
110
e. Dumber of additional acres to be mined annually -
Approximately 15.
(3)

B. Conservation and Reclamation
1. Summary of past efforts to protect the environment, if any
a. Areas rehabilated for some use (include number of acres).
Examples include but are not limited to, land use for:
residential, commercial, & industrial sites; forest,
farming, pasture, wildlife, and recreation. Briefly
describe methods of rehabilation, such as grading, level-
ing, planting of vegetation, erosion prevention etc.
Surface drainage and dewatering of the pit
area presents no erosion or water pollution
problems on the relatively low, flat site.
See B-2.
(4)

2. Summary of present and proposed conservation and land
reclamation plans and procedures, if any -
Quarrying to date has been to open and establish
method of operation. Mining has now reached
the sta e where future stripping (approx. 1 to
3 ratio}g can be deposited in worked -out areas.
Due to elevation of deposit below thelevel of
streams and rivers, primary rehabilitation will
be to 'a useful lake, with grading of the peri-
meter and islands to provide a gently rolling
topography free from stagnant water areas.
Attention will be given to encourage vegetation
growth, fish and wildlife protection.
Entire quarry is active in that extent of de-
posit has not been reached in any direction.
Operation will continue for several years be-
fore any worked -out areas can be isolated to
the point that pumping of those areas can be
discontinued and rehabilitation completed.
J�

C. Maps
1. County highway map with mine location indicated. County
highway maps may be obtained from: Location Department,
State Highway Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602.
Small maps of each county are available for $0.15 each
plus 3% sales tax. Make checks payable to North Carolina
State Highway Commission.
2. Map (accuxate drawing, aerial photograph or enlarged topo-
graphic map) of mine area of a scale sufficient to clearly
show the following:
a. Property lines or affected area of mining operation
b. Outline of pits
c. Outline of stockpile areas (done)
d. Outline of overburden disposal areas
e. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be
described as to location and distance from mine if
sufficiently far removed)
f. Location and name of streams and lakes
g. Outline of settling ponds
h. Location of access roads
i. Map legend
1. Name of company
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Date prepared
7. Name of person preparing map
Signatire r
Title
(6)

•1i �' . Il
ntIf
o-L'x7iaF
+ ) DEPAETMENT
It
u
t�
Y v�
cot ordaa
Mining'
C4!'5A';
y i ��'>r t � W m .EPermiseion-ls hereby„ grantedato:�
,r YM 7 tyJ,� rt1a MarlettarAggs gat?`Xi' ��`e' �r.�r{'`'..";,•�)
a. -' � � + 5s cruehedyatane quart
a. for the``o er2tio¢ of a ti a ,,- � +s.
>� � J e '� 'CtPr. `�Caetle Rayne tQuar� aA ^ �� d r:•. ;"
s .a
A9¢ow
+,„ and located Yntiµ r
°w Ti i r ,Coun�tyF which, afi
lyy, d°i _ r f bx c,+y, J
S that)the}usefulness ap;oductIf
ivity';end ecenio ye
➢ a a W x"u P an wa[eie affected by Ch�ie•�minia'Itg operation'wIf
I�

/
�
�
�y
� \
y
� /

2 Of 6
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, here-
inafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved Recla-
mation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclmation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception:
If another operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted
mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise,the
Department may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that
the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with
reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or'permittee's
successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and con-
ditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the purposes and requirements
of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator written notice of its
intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right
to a hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to
the above, the Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-49.
rn"ditinnc
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air quality,
surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by the Environmental
Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until July 20, 1992
and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46,
et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

3 of 6
OPERATING CONDITIONS
This permit represents a renewal of permit no. 65-1 originally issued on
July 20, 1972. The permit area is amended to include the approximately
1 84. acres north of the Ideal Cement Spur of the Seaboard Coastline, east
of the proposed right-of-way of Interstate Highway 40 and south of S.R.
1002.
I. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance
with permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the Division
of Environmental Management.
2. Any mining process producing air contaminant emissions shall be
subject to the permitting requirements and regulations promulgated
by the Division of Environmental Management.
3. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and
any adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway
from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of
the natural watercourse.
4. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to
diversions, earthern dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt
retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance to prevent sediment from
discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake or natural
watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
5. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the
angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate
erosion control measure, structure or device. In Any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause
offsite damage due to siltation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such erosion.
6. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of
pools of water that are, or are likely to become, noxious or foul.
Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be
constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
7. The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator
to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock
or vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise
provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the
immediate location of any building regularly occupied by human
beings such as dwelling house, church, school, public building,
or commercial or institutional building.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 123 decibels linear
(dBL)-"warning," 132 dBL "caution," and 135 dBL "maximum" as

d
4OF6
measured at the immdiate location of any regularly occupied building
such as any dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that flyrock
is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently
guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the guarded area,
it shall be reported to the Department immediately, who will conduct a
thorough investigation to determine the cause. Failure to take corrective
measures to prevent flyrock and repeated instances%of .flyrock shall be
considered a violation of the permit.
D. Operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing the
total number of holes; pattern of holes; depth of holes; total pounds
of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amunt of steaming
and burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall be maintained
at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.
E. Operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a period
for which notice is requested.
8. A buffer strip 200 feet wide or wider shall be maintained between the top
edge of any mine excavation and the highway right -of. -way of State Road 1.002.
The buffer strip may either be tuidisturbed utilizing existing trees and
vegetation for visual screening or may be a combination of an earthen berm
and undisturbed buffer. If an earthen berm is used, the sideslopes of 'the
berm shall be graded to a S hori..,ontal to 1 vertical slope or flatter. The
toe of the berm shall be at least 50 feet from the right-of-way line; for
State Road 1002. The berm shall be seeded in appropriate trees and grasses
during the earliest favorable planting season after construction for stability
and visual screening. The 50 foot buffer between the toe and the highway
right--of-way shall remain undisturbed except to install any required sediment
control measures for the berm or to improve visual screening.
9. Observation wells shall be installed and monitored as approved by the Department.
10. A physical barrier consisting of a :fence or boulder barriers, etc., small be
maintained around the perimeter of any quarry highwall.
1.1. An Annual Reelarmition Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of Each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.
12. The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the fom of
$25,000 blanket bond is sufficient to cover the Castle ifayne Quarry operation
as indicated on the approved application. This security must remain in force
for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the
bonded acreage.
APPRDVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is
a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit.

5 of 6
Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the
permittee, which continues beyond the term of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided by G. S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the
possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of the
land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be
provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in
accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is suit-
able for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the
mined area that are, or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the N. C.
Agricultural Experiment Station and the N. C. Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan, which
shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with
mining operations and in any event, initiation of reclamation at the
earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining
on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
Reclamation Conditions
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation shall be to reclaim the processing plant, and
portions of the quarry excavation to a condition suitable for other
industrial development and to restore the remainder of the quarry
excavation to a lake area.
2. -The specifications for the reclamation shall be as follows:
A. Overburden or waste material, including tailings, shall be used
to back fill portions of the mine excavation and to slope the
sides of the excavation.
B. The side slopes of the excavation consisting of unconsolidated
material shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slope
or flatter.

6 of 6
C. Disturbed areas adjacent to the portion of the restored lake
area shall be gradedto an approximately level condition and
smoothed.
D. The processing plant, stockpile, and other areas to be
reclaimed as an industrial site shall be graveled to an
approximately level condition and smoothed.
E. Scrap metal, trash, or other such waste shall be properly
disposed. No contaminants or chemical waste shall be dumped at
the site without the appropriate permits from the Division of
Environmental Management and/or the Department of Human
Resources.
F. The reclaimed area shall be graded to prevent collection of
noxious or stagnant water.
3. Revexetation Plan
A ground cover shall be established on all affected lands in
unconsolidated material utilizing a combination of grasses and pine
trees. Grasses would include Sericea lespedeza, lovegrass, fescue,
rye. Lime and fertilizer shall be applied as indicated by soil
tests.
4. Reclamation Schedule
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as
soon as .feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including revegeta-
tion, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination
of mining.
Permit issued this the / day of iZ1A4CL/ , 19V
By 4Z- , ✓
Ste Hrector Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • i aleilzh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary r_ ., Director
2���ary 16, 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUECTEn
Mr. �lorace Willson
+anager, Environmental Services
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. u. Cori 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622
RE: Release of Pit Nos. 2 and 3 and Surrounding Areas of Pit No. 4
Castle Hayne Quarry
Permit No. 65-01
Pender County
Dear Mr. Willson:
An inspection was made of the above mire on July 21, 1989 in accordance to
G. S. 74-56 of the Mining Act of 1971. During that inspection Pit Nos. 2 and 3
and the surrounding area of Pit No. 4 ';.ere deemed releasable. However, as Pit
No. I is currently being used by Occidental Chemical to store their treated
sludge and Pit No. 4 (81.9 acres) is to regain active as a disposal area for
your company's sand washing operation, Pit Nos. I and 4 are to remain active
under Mining Permit Number 65-01.
As Pit Nos'. 2 and 3 and the surroundinc areas of Pit No. 4 were found to be
satisfactorily reclaimed, your company is released from further reclamation
responsibility for these areas with respect to the Mining Act.
Very truly yours,
Step'nen G. Conrad
SGC/TED/se
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, P.E.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carohra 27641•-687 1elcphone 919.733.3833
An Equal Opporruniry Arrnia-;Vt Ac[ion Employer

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
p Telephone Log
Dam: /� [p Sheet � of
Time: /000 'P f-am
❑ pm
2. Conversation
3. Affiliation:
4. Content of
Call: Placed ❑ Received 40
Returned ❑
r/u . '-.i i � . MW
M - I i
1i r� 4V4/d'�l Lam- L/�s % A7�r OIiir.3 0 ✓s /oA/7`15

c
w
C44--�1
-
Nw�
- Oc-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA STEPHEN G. CONRAD
DEPARTMENTOF DIRECTOR
NATURAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMECES NT
MEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES _BATE: `rl� pO
SUBJECT:
T'.
6,lef�—

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone Log
Datca—i�J /�-10— Shcet off
Time: 0/e Jff_am Call: Placed 0. Received ❑
� %� �--�❑ pm Returned ❑
1. Project:,/f'(_.[4 A4eud�%/l6 At County:
e
2. Conversation with: � / Telephone: ( )
3.AfGliadon: AV
4. Content of conversation:
Q G 1L PT m. 2 121&.
Jrcrd Lhar,�:�[i�1t A�OIL ti P� elz.
cc:
70*1

4�

G
Airy
MO
a
b/
;owl- .GX[G,cp�a�M .G_CLn[Ti+-
d f a/ 6 :
4

'
I
II
1\
N
\
v
\
r
.
'
....
..
..

RECEIVED
FEB 0,4 1990
[Alin ",JAI I SECT-IDIV
February 8, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tracy Davis, Assistant Mining Specialist
FROM: Daniel Sams, Wilmington Regional Engineer
RE: Mining Activities
Martin Marietta's Castle Ha e gya - Here is the follow-up inspection of the
site that I performed after our (You, Tom and me) July 7, 1989 inspection.
It should be self explanatory. If they can work out all the details with
Occidental Chemical, our office has no objections.
DES 1 ds

F�E(;t1VED
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Devel 6p`fi60ZO 799p
Division of Land Resources, Land Oualily Section ...
,1141jrySff,TION
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1.MINENAME CASTLE dA, 4E OL'APRy 2.MINING PERMIT k 65-01
3.OPERATOR 11nAgE,rj MA9jr1TrA ArCCCCATES 4. COUNTY .1/er.l ,Qio✓6e
5. ADDRESS Ro. .ptov IooN RALE/Gd Alc 97co ZZ
6. Person (s) contacted at site u�a nn.a nenz-
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? WYes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes No
9. Dale last inspected: 19 /9s 10. Any minfirg since last inspection ? Yes ❑ o
11. Is the mine in Compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? oyes ❑ No
If no, explain:
A-7ve A+Ne ExcA✓ArarJ r,/Ar �/ar �haccT�a
12. Is the mine in wmplfance with the Reclamation Conditions of thre Permit ? Ves ❑ No
If no, explain: Te /wre. k„al/5 r✓d.'e m,�lc�ec, w'ice hark a% /aa✓�,-e c/
ze d
_
�6c t:r ,.,..1J�6� .,d.a .,„:F. /,: ... .r
0
.<. m 2 ..a I-
—�
�
�., i ne �c clod
13. Did any of the above defiaencies result in ollsite damage? Yes �No II yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Correclive measures needed and/ortaken: P4:.or rod:l Gried ..6a._
15. Other recommendations and comments: W ar c - ,., 1, s k
♦k ai- ra-Ices• of C%r s af r d .,v,le,• tl
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Repon +/ - mapawurate ? Yes No (Explain) Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed I 1X Yes ❑ No Proposed date —7—/ /2
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Repon _ 19- Copy of Report sent to operator_/_J_
ata)
INSPECTED BY, �' C ��.-.�I DATE: 7 11 /d_h`
Phone No:(j}S) �s5r-y�1
Whire copy to life Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
FEv. ytle

1%.
MAKIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
January 8, 1990
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
Subject: Request for Release
Castle Hayne Quarry
Permit #65-1
Dear Mr. Davis:
P. O- BOX 30013
RALEIGH, N.c, 27622-0013
TELEPHONE t9191 781.4550
In my December 20, 1989 letter to Mr. Stephen Conrad, 1 incorrectly included pit #1 in
the request for release.
As you know, this pit is used by Occidental Chemical to store their treated sludge. We
are currently working up an agreement with Occidental whereby they will be responsible
for the reclamation requirements. A copy of this agreement will be submitted for your
files in the near future.
We would like to proceed with our request on pits #2, #3 and #4. Please let us know if
you should have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Horace S. Willson
Manager
Environmental Services
HSW/oe

Tc Vk'" \� Date
T Speed Lettero
FromS Date
Subject,
n��PRPNWci.us.swriT
Reply
Signed
SENDER —DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT.

I ld Qcalhy 4:cau.aI
_Memo
Date: d
To:
cAsrw-' AAgw� gow"q (k6gs-aj) -
6i /990 L3coof— .
n-
Division of [And acswscea, Nonh GmNm 1lgnnm of linvironmcm, I Icalsh, and Nasu d ai uvws

To full- 7y Fru� Date
utiu�i�Tre ux7,1� l�
Signed
wlN nes .
cnnax.ss ��
SENDER -DETACH AND RETAIN YEL
�Lspeea L ttera
From 9401-o( r/Date s gl90
e L4Z�
PIT '�,
Reply. µL A44LA1

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
April 25, 1990
Mr. Tracy E. Davis
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Division
Division of Land Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Tracy:
P. O. BOX 30013
PALEnH, N.C_ 27622-0013
TELEPHONE 191% 781-4550
RECEIVED
APR '4 7 1990
LAMP 011AL.IIY SECTION
Following up on your request of last week that we provide you with a history of pit #1
down at our Castle Hayne Quarry, we are obliged to provide the following information.
Prior to 1980, Diamond Shamrock was discharging its waste material into pit Ill. At that
time Martin Marietta was also adding its limestone fines to the same pit.
Diamond Shamrock (predecessor to Occidental Chemical) has installed a total of 15 test
wells around the pit area. It is our understanding that the wells are sampled once each
week for chloride concentration and chrome content. The sludge is insoluble in water
and will not leach. We believe the pH is between 6.0 and 8.5. All appropriate agency
approvals are in force, and as far as we know all sampling has been within the limits of
500 parts per million or less of chloride.
An inspection by Land Quality Section on June 7, 1983 noted that the area surrounding
the flooded pit had been seeded and stabilized. In July of 1986 we requested that flooded
pits numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 be released from our reclamation bond. In February of 1990
the Division of Land Resources submitted a letter noting that pits numbers 2, 3, and the
surrounding area of pit #4 were found to be satisfactorily reclaimed and the company
was then released from further reclamation responsibilities for these areas. Pit #1 could
not be released at that time since it is currently being used by Occidental Chemical for
the discharge of their waste materials. In July of 1989 Martin Marietta discontinued any
discharge into pit #1. Martin Marietta has not since that date and will not at any time in
the future discharge its limestone fines or any other materials into pit #1.
In 1982 Martin Marietta sold pit #1 to Occidental Chemical. Fart of the sales agreement
was that Martin Marietta be allowed to continue to discharge its limestone fines into pit
#1. As mentioned above we did exactly that until July of 1999.

Mr. Tracy E. Davis
April 25, 1990
Page 2
As we mentioned in our discussion the other day we are interested in completing our
reclamation responsibilities for pit #1. We do not own that pit nor do we discharge
anything into it, and we are interested in finding out what we need to do in order to
complete our obligation. We would appreciate your discussing this with Mr. Telfer and
then letting us know when you and Mr. Telfer might be available for a meeting. l am
copying Occidental with this letter and have suggested to them that maybe they would
like to be present at this meeting also. We look forward to hearing from you at your
early convenience. Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to
advise.
Sincerely,
R. Paxton Badham, Jr.
RPB,J r/oe
cc: Bruce Deerson
W. H. Powell
Pete Piekenbrock

I" � 1 aoo'
±2. AL93a,'5 9VOf-i987 ►
., �� ✓_�-� � �f� �_ Look p �' IT_� I
IT
•� � �-` ` � -± � r � of p �� .
r• � 11 V �7 t.�
}
;?-AXEA17 1907
h. le'.

DATE '(�� 1 o
SUBJECT
MESBArarm l�l-lu [�arL� t'K
I
v1 JP-Ir
. o`��� ((�(/3��e1 C"
Ytn� GI%a-✓���ta-rs-e `dal Cc9cv�v w /JiaOonk.�Y-ear .�7�����`d
_ _ "✓e94 t LL�Iy /h2v;e>� :15 �r`s r�4�� s FokL,k 1r o74-f
`'f��SVc✓G�i-...'�//1�`�5'�[��ii�.I.+r��ecQ Cyr� � 7�1i•5 �OC4_- G,ue��Gv
40k
r
SIGNED
REPLY I
I
IAn .. rrt.r ro, rr
SIGNED DATE
REDL IM 41S 475 SEND PARTS i AND S INTACT CMbY/IlClts
POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P475 PART B WILL BE RETURNED WIT REPLY.
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP'

t
.. � � �
I T
�� � � l �
� 8`�
� ��a.
__3q � LL' o �
' � - - -- f.

i4
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
December 20, 1989
Mr. Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment, Health
And Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
Subject: Request for Release
Castle Hayne Quarry
Permit #65-1
Dear Mr. Conrad:
P. O. BOX 30013
HALEIGH, N.C. 27622-0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
_QeCC93
89
Dec°�z 19ay
t��n �+'�AI tijY SE.LIiON
This letter is in regard to our meeting in your office on November 13, 1989. Present were
Mike Jones and 1 from Martin Marietta with Charles Gardner and Tom Carroll from your
staff.
As you recall, we were reviewing the reclamation work that has been accomplished
around pits #1, #2, #3 and #4. The main focus of the meeting centered on the treatment
of pit #4 which is still active as a disposal area for our sand washing operation.
It was agreed that the area around Pit #4 has been successfully reclaimed and is ready
for release subject to our forwarding a map outlining the area that would remain active.
Attached for your review is a survey map provided by Whitt Land Surveying outlining the
81.9 acres that would remain active.
With the exception of the above surveyed area, we would like to request that the
remaining acreage in and around Pits #1, #2, #3 and 114 be released.
Please let us know at your earliest convenience if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
Horace Willson
Manager
Environmental Services
HW/oe
Attachment

11, % 1000'
rwm MAfzrIN M isr-ra Aac;lzec
C� fl&f�wy Qum
2AOM42 1M-�ogWEv Ig87
,n7 f94ZEv prr-42
! C.7
>
125 AGRli

NOTE:
V)F-..••„•7+,-�✓ �"• THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM A RADIAL TRAVERSE
iE�6»ItRf :O •� OF PIT #4 ONLY; THIS IS NOT A PROPERTY MAP.
t SEAL NUMBERS ON MAP DENOTE POINT NUMBERS ON
l' GROUND. RAW ERROR OF CLOSURE = 1:10,000+.
1-3233 •Ok
OF
Ogg ,,., REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
R.R. CROSSING PIT #3
/� TRAVF.RSF AREA ENDS
/ IS •c' y�Al MAINAGL DITCH
M
12
1159 5
� w
S67
s
z
PIT #4
4
81.9 AC.
0
$
D
N87}g'W 586'20'W
407.6 504.1
56AAA 7-
t6
3
27p 52W
585 gS�W
,G N854�W
572gp2 G
TRAVERSE RUNS ALONG
11
TOP OF SLOPE AROUND PIT
HAMPSTEAD ROAD (HOLLY SHELTER
Whitt Land Surl2eying
828 Nw Ro
Rd". N.C. 276M
919-828 7621
F.F.A. TOWER ROAD
-
ti
/ ^ O
9 ryNy.
?hhrry�
r'
4 yhry
4�
PIT #2 /
R.R. CROSSING
/
24 / 25
N N
y�
23
:n
22
23
O Y
N
IS 19
BLUE CLAY ROAD

i
`S.�cs�ss_fe i2us e� i� eJ_ 4 s I Z. 3 u S W(.
—a
wtwt/ ups f� mz±a t g (hL. ate
e 42-s 3.
aarc�,
Cw� VWtB ,�w�ey%q��ne�e� �. `( e,
(LSeUQ
V1'lWlA_�SeecQtic� o Wov/ f ��eCck4czU
it �t Cl , _ Cr_, fC (D Z l �J in bP
�
(�. /
T�° ^L� Lc99c�- �--
i�R VQ VimccY
c�cc ✓4`�! �_ �` ©ce . GetCS
_V`EC�U w_� D t o2 ! (d� fM IM A rcSyY.c b
YC �8��(izt& (� �l�vu4l—

fw�
tx
CV

�";..!!
P zed
�L`Q-✓ �P..J LA CUJeNWl t l T77 0Q�'T'iVVviPCX
4t,C OIC[X 'tm Imo. /LIp,�C� 0-.�YaI�Q
�n9o-✓�,.e � 9,ti `� LS 5 ���. SR-,re-✓� a-.�S

�i
i
� '°� l
':!�
.ems`.
I
•.Y r
.\�
� i
_ ..
�, -
,�-�.a
1
=i f
i I
�
. P
_
..
a
�I�
1.
JJ
�
_
� �
1 .. �
..
liv �
�' I'

North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Developmertt�
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section 1(ir. ,,
MINE INSPECTION REPORT Jut
(PERMITTED MINE) t, ntt-0't 1 Y
1. MINE NAME C /t S TL E �fA'r f t C U C' e % 2. MINING PERMIT #
3.OPERATOR i 'wA,<ic-7rx, rF('-^-7'E :i 4.COUNTY Alea)
5. ADDRESS Re) F' or Ale 7762Z
6. Person (s) contacted at site
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: 7 / 19 / �, 9 10. Any mining since last inspection ? `t( Yes ❑ No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? 0 Yes ❑ No
It no, explain:
,fir 'Ti vc ly1,Ajel
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? [ Yes ❑ No
If no, explain: 1.0, ; r, t _, 4
�Y� r, i i• ri l f, nr� rya, fi h 7 '-r,; -f 1.1�
i'rn�
�c -.r; �� E._ N,ck r,..,r[ Jr+T'�•r Ja• .,.d
O1 ct
tChIer'ne/ra.,
fi
q
r e12 ri i..ln . �J ~i -.. V %'. :. �- r. Ir V v r^ ✓ -w� !.�! • f 1 , r cl w • Le
4 n �-J [(' r • r i ,_ [1
TGr fa.Vr,, cl
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? ❑ Yes r5� No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed and I or taken: r}'t . ,. ^ f :-n r, C4. {,r 4•r A . %W f. ,i • Zi.�.,r ) .�
<:rc
I l\
a
15../ Other recommendationsandcomments: r`� i u) of is , , r,,,^ f , +, ;_ �I : l' ` iz, ` j e f� t r C.
k_. AY ( `Cu-,C [71 ;r�C ,C... IC:r 5 YC[ r.n nv�rr ckr (t `/'. 1M 1C 1`41 t.1), V
"JAI 0 Cc
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report + ! - map accurate ? ❑ Yes [:]No (Explain)
D Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? 0 Yes ❑ No Proposed date
[
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator —
(date)
INSPECTED BY: DATE: ! •? 1 `3
Phone No: (7q) 1//6-/
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
REV. 9/88

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCSES 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND RESOURCES DIVISION
LAND QUALITY SECTION
TELEPHONE LOG
Sheet
Date 7/2S
County
/ '/ - Call received _ Call placed
1. Project: ��II (i. (J� Y94( 4 }tom. p ``
2. Conversation with: UN . 0.0 JBVIeS
3. Content of conversation: 1 Wpo
�Ljl
A.F A� `f 4�-- �re�✓
Neu e- G 4 . t%.c p(w,.- 4 a ke cv be hac k
Filled by:

TO
ISU01EC!'ji TL//C T�/ ii� a
/
DAtE� h� I
LesaRnwee24rzr
n
IiYA'JGr mom. rWr �F%G `dl KmTC.S - f�A'� �iLF iS !�(GE�S GAT
/fJ')
P$..�'743X �_ I
/yVb �iC G..- � .�F..�
•gyp
�
I
E SIGNED
�L-GL' �� O
_
_
I
I
DAiE
SIGNED
"
SEND PARES 1 AND S INTACT--
_ _ caEbo is
?IXY PnR,lw SFTSJ <P a69 PMtT: S WILL RE'RETURNED WINE REPLY.
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP

+,,, ,,,,,,.
?i l-:
,.;:a?p.l:
11U:
Ca.,ilc Hayne�4vairy
An ons�itc nee Ling was held on 7/7/88 in refcrenco to 10/9/87 Letter from T.
Carroll to Dean Hardy. '19ie following are Eiead notes compiled during the site
.inseCl-ion. A copy of Uze originalhandwritten notes t-.ere provided to the mine
manager, Butch Barnhardt. Also in attendence were H. Willson, M. hi.ttle. 6 Tracy
gavi:>.
Mine Area 3
"_esr. ;.; F!ork a-mpleted -water has
Ix -en divert_d.
Rip -rap in place.
Sparse
biliiagrass and bermudagrass. Bennudrg;rass
starting to run
quite well
± kobe lespedeza. Area is
releaseable.
Item 3: Rip --rap has been selectively placed in two areas, stake planting of
willow with wax myrtles set out - generally quite sparse. Additional
plantings to be done this year (fall). Suggestion was made to utilize
bark mulch (strippings) with plantings.
Bare mounds on south and north. sides of road in area separating Area 2
from Area 3 needs reseeding - very sparse vegetation. Again,
re-ca.endaticn was made on use of bark mulch when reseeding is done:
Mine Area 4
Itap 1: Highwal.l eliminated. Slope at approximately 3:1 - looks good.
Item 2: as above - black locust are fairly abundant, area was seeder] with rye
grain and cover crop with kobe, sericea '_ fescue. Natural drainage
channel at SW corner. - minor bank erosion on repaired channel - wax
myrtles and willows plant-od along stream channel should do ths job on
longterm basis but additional. willow stakings are needed on 4 x 4
spacing.
Stem 3.: Gravel mulch appliedto mostof area when it was reseeded - good cover
crop of rye grain but sparse permanent vegetation at this time. One.
area on western slope of gut (inlet) was not mulched - all vegetation
is very sparse and gullies developing. Needs to be mulched heavily
and topdressed. Runoff from south of pit area has been directed away
from slope - should help a great deal in establishing a permanent
vegetative cover.
4

a
ME I irtin 5riena Ayregates,
Page 2
Itan 4 walkcd entirc of el. :"n
and gunly is very wall established. Several accesf.--;
points along the southern and northern slopes exist that would provide
VaN to good access in/out of the lake area - these appna.i,
satisfac:Lory 'but shoule1 bez- identified Oin, a site 1"'ap as was originally
I t(_!m 'Ro,-.jeKay and ditchlines arc still in need of repair (see photos).
Rec.-0-:m1end rij.,-m--ap 75-100') and stabilize roadbanks which
are presently, undercutting , --- primarily RR side (northside) .
Alternative would be to mnve road southward and use resulting fill to
Uc)• ER! along northern slope to a min. 2:1 angle preventing any need
to encrouch into FTC right-of-way. Reestablish ditchline and riprap
for permanent stabilization.
1.0/9/8? letter stressed need to use mulch on any repair areas - it
didn't appear that this was done to any great extent. Again, highly
--ecop -e %Pend Use of bar.) mulch if available - if not use small
mall grain
s--tLa�,,j to provi6e min. of 80% ground co-,,,er. :f.f usi�ny graJ.n straw need
to crip or tack.
TEC: se
cc: Dan Sams

North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
//�� (PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME �r6it<14I 4eCS•�o+xtt 2. MINING PERMIT# 65-1
3.OPERATOR I4Ar�4n.. 4. COUNTY Alur.l ldtu rtwY
5. ADDRESS N.C. (ko).. -�CQC25 ka lacIUG 12
2,Z
6. Person (s) contacted at site /'YF+It. r ( r 1_
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? Q Yes ❑ No 8. Pictures ? EJ Y_es Lj No
9. Date last inspected: _i /_/ Q1 10. Any mining since last inspection ? 0 Yes No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Eyes ❑ No
If no, explain: . //
lrrPrti r/ fr-f imrrle. eyeriurAs.. (049 nal� >hn&rvLdeQ,
v
12. Is the mine in Compliance with the Reclamation CondNions of the Permit ? ❑ Yes No
If no, explain: GG� �n. �.. Mn Fn...n �n �.�2
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? ❑ Yes LE No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage: 1ft14r.G. n wcS�
n
14. Corrective measures needed and / or taken: S.PP. 6�Na Ar dC
15. Other recommendations and comments: 41,�.I IL4 `slm4;c: t.�o-lw fewls c�+r vu•.rbla
•'i c,r41e tle�leci„Il„ �sl„h;l�pebl ber4a'e_ �Ila,a�.a•-n;+ �1-n.t-;11 vnrw4P
.;f e+e.r-2a%rRn.t U.N.„ eJ aCreSS iN ®hle�wJs _ ' `
r
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report+/ - map accurate ? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑k Not Reviewed
17. Follow-upinspection needed ? 1 V/
� p � Yes ❑ No Proposed date �!_
'1 U
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report— 19. Copy of Report sent to operator /�/_
/qq -L'(/ „I /� (date)
INSPECTED BY, t,t rr� Oy�+fS DATE: i / 7 / _
Phone No:(4ry) 734�If5 j
White ropy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
PEv.YW

r s,. FAlt
e �o�
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office Q 610& 4j600
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Horace Wilson
Martin Marietta Basic Products
Post Office Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 270622-OO13
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
May 9, 1985 �6) e.A4, 9�4 .
!40
C�(ilec.ec •
Dear Horace: VAA
This is to acknowledge the annual reclamation inspection I made at your Castle Hayne
and Rocky Point Quarries on April 23, 1985. I appreciate your assistance along with
Dean Hardy and Carol Cameron as well as Butch Barnhardt at the Castle Hayne Quarry
and Jodie Wood at Rocky Point.
I found your reclamation efforts to be very successful at Castle Haye and recommend
that you continue using the same seeding specifications in future stabilization of
mined over ar_eas.: The grading and ground preparation -for -seeding -I observed to.
[atlequate and_commend_Cean�Hardy andjButcli Barnhardt for a_,jo.b_well done at`Castiej.
dyne.
a
The Rocky Point site was also found to be in, good shape and I would like to commend
Jodie Wood in his efforts at reclamation proceedings simultaneously with mining.
It goes without saying that reclamation and good conservation practices were observed
at both your Castle Hayne and Rocky Point sites. Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
Gerald J. Kr ynak
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
GJK/cfl
cc: Jim Simons, Mining Specialist
7225 Wri1;lttwille Avenue, Wiimingtoii, N.C. 28403.306 • Telephone 919-25n41M
An Equal Opff) tunin• Aftirmadve Action Lmployco

.:.+ SZATC o
North Carolina Department of Natural
,. Resources & Community Development
• b James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor James A. Summers: Secr6tar
•"' uw ,Falb' 1
April 18, 1984
Ms. Carole Cameron
Associate ASLA
Construction Aggregates Division
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Dear Ms. Cameron:
DIVISION Of.
LAND RESOURCES
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
terepnone 919 733.3633
Thank you for your letter of April 16, 1984 concerning-•revegetation
of the berm along S.R. 1002.
Since the FAA has requested that the existing berms along S.R. 1002
be lower to prevent interference with their VORTAC facility, a
reasonable delay in revegetation is understandable. Please be sure
appropriate sediment control measures are taken if needed to prevent
off -site sedimentation.
We look forward to seeing the continuation of the fine reclamation
begun of Castle Hayne.
ncerely,
James Da Simons, C.P.C.S.,P.E.
Mining Specialist
JDS/cj
cc: Gerald Kraynak
Geological Survey---733-2423. Geodetic Survey—• 733.163G: Land OuaIiIy--7';3-a57a. Eartn Resources plannirig -^733-.;833.
Land ResOurces Information Servir (— 733-2090 Box 27667 Raleigh, NC 27511-75F.7
An EauacbnoortururyAll irrnalw4Ac:icr+Employer

North Carolina Department .of Natural
Resources &Community Development.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsley, Secretary
June 7, 1983
Mr. Worth Sellers
Martin Marietta, Construction Aggregates Division
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, N.C. 27622
Dear Mr. Sellers:
�Horace
83 I made the annual reclamation inspection of your
Casand the Rocky Point Site. I would like to thank Dean
Har. and Carol Cameron who acccmpanied n and Harlan
Britt, our Chief Engineer, on the inspection tour.
At the Castle Hayne Quarry, we found the flooded 140-acre lake
with approximately 23 acres surrounding lake seeded and stabilized to
be most commendable. And at the Rocky Point Site we found the drainage
ditches and early operations proceeding as outlined in permit application.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff
for the efforts you've made in reclamation and your good conservation
practices.
Ve truly yours,
Gerald J. aynak
Regional ga.neer
Land Quality Section
GJK/jc 6//0/83
Xe)
Ali Egrrul Uh x,rlrrrrifi R1lrmrufiv,! .;owii t-wpio,vei

North Carolina Department of Natural
'V Resources &Community Development
Jarnes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W, Grimsley,-Secretary
Mr. Horace Wilson
Senior Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Post Office Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Dear Horace:
April 30, 1982
(J
li. /,! lo4e�
On April 7, 1982 an inspection was made of your Castle Hayne Quarry in
New Hanover County as required by G. S. 74-56 of the Mining Act of 1971.
I would like to thank Dean Hardy and Carol Cameron for their assistance
in making this inspection.
Your mining operation was found to be in compliance with the Mining Act
of 1971. 1 was most impressed to find the amount.of previously mined
areas being shaped and smoothed preparatory to seeding for final.stab-
ilization.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff for
their efforts in the reciamation.accoanplished thus. fax at. the Castle
Hayne Quarry.
very truly yours,
Gerald J. Kr ak
Regional ineer
GJKJcfp
WiIinington Regional Office 7225WrightsvilleAvenue. Wilmington, N.C. 28403-3696 Telephonc9191256-41G1
An Equal Opportunity Affirmatfve'Action tmployer

North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
November 14, 1980
ke
Mr. Horace Wilson
Senior Environmental Engineer (f/
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, N. C. 27612
Dear Horace: Y/
On November 7, 1980, an inspection of your Castle Hayne Quarry in the
New Hanover County was made as required by C.S. 74-56 of the Mining Act of
1971. I met with your Landscape Engineer, Carole Cameron who accompanied
me on the overall inspection.
I was very pleased to find much progress made since the inspection of
April 6, 1979 after which a deficiency letter was written. I found all
deficiencies corrected and look forward to working with Carole in implementing
further reclamation activities at your Castle Hayne Quarry.
The development of the pit into a lake as outlined in your permit application
appears to be progressing adequately in compliance with the provisions of your
permit.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff for
your efforts in reclamation and observing good conservation practices.
Sincerely,
OeraLd J. /RaynakYto--��
Regional i3gineer
Land Quality Sec.
cc: Carole Cameron
Jay Powell
Wilmington Regional Office 7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, N. C. 28403 Telephone [phone]e181
An Equal Opportunity Afflimatfve Action Employer

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES P o. sox 30013
RALEIGH, N.C. 27622 0013
TELEPHONE [phone]
July 9, 1986
Mr. Tom Carole
Acting Mining Specialist
Division of Land Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Subject: Request for Release
Castle Hayne Quarry
Mined Out Pits #1, #2, #3 and #4
Dear Mr. Carole:
We have recently completed a very extensive reclamation program at our
Castle Hayne Quarry, which is adjacent to I-40 just north of Wilmington.
All mining activities west and north of the existing crushing plant have
been completed.Exposed areas above the water line have been graded and
seeded with an adequate vegetative cover.
All future mining activity will take place east of the crushing plant on
property leased from Ideal Basic Industries. The four flooded pits are
shown on the attached aerial photo. Total acreage for all four pits amounts
to 520 acres.
We trust that this request meets with your approval. Please give me a call
if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
Horace Willson
Manager
Environmental Services
HW/oe
Attachment

9
�Oe4
.. 'L/.. A
_. [.le-.�. � ir2�c -,-'tip'°--✓ic=.Ca.v..�.�' � .
ca�L� L� icR. ece,�cr�
-,74��

Interoffice Memo
TO: BUTCH BARNHARDT
FROM: CAROLE CAMERON
RE: SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECLAMATION
AGGREGATES DIVISION
April 25, 1985
cc: Dean Hardy
W. T. Sellers
Horace Willson
Attached are specifications and a list of contractors to be submitted with
requisition to purchasing. I am estimating the low bid to come in around
$45,500 for your planning purposes. If you have any questions, please call.
Attachment

SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECLAMATION PLANTING AT CASTLE RAYNE QUARRY
Korean Lespedeza
@
25
lb/ac
Pensacola Bahia
@
50
lb/ac
Ky 31 Fescue
@
50
lb/ac
I
Weeping Love Grass
@
5
lb/ac
Sorg= Sudan Grass
@
50
lb/ac
Black Locust
@
1
lb/ac
10-20-20 Fertilizer
@
500
lb/ac
Note: Slopes average 3:1
Total acres included in project: 91 acres
Contractor will guarantee a permanent stand of ground cover.

Interoffice Memo
TO: R. W. EDWARDS
FROM: CAROLE CAMERON
RE: CASTLE MAYNE - MINE INSPECTION
CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES DIVISION
June 1, 1983
CC: W. H. Powell
H. S. Willson ✓
W. T. Sellers
D. Hardy
On 5l27 Horace Willson, Dean Hardy and I met with,Cerald Kraynak and Harlan
Britt, Chief Engineer N.R.C.D. We looked.at the approximately 25 acres which
have been reclaimed adjacent to I-40. We pointed to the addition of pine
seedlings and Mr. Kraynak seemed very pleased with the way the area looks.
He agreed that we could.plant pines on the island. We explained that we plan
to have additional areas ready for seeding in September 1983,.March and
September 1984. This will complete reclamation requirements for the pit
within the stipulated two year period. No deficiencies were noted at the
Castle Rayneoperation.
We also visited Rocky Point; no problems were noted. Mr. Kraynak promised to
send us a letter.

g. ¢ T 3 �; '- 1'+ State of North Carolina
s Department of Natural Resources S Community Development
ibv& 1,�; r tt' Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
i`!((A'vN N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P 0 R T
Noi 'Carolina General Statutes 74-55 and the Mining Regulations require that
"The mine ope£ator shall, by February I of each year during the life of the permitted
operation, and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit,
file with the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Failure to file this form by the date specified may result in the assessment of
civil penalties and could even result in the revocation of the mining permit.
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
Name of Mine Castle Hayne Quarry County New Hanover - Permit Number 65-1
Name of Company/Owner Martin Marietta Aggregates
Official Mailing Address P. 0. Box 398, Castle Bayne, NC Zip Code 28429
Telephone[phone] Check if change of address or telephone
1. (a) If mine is new inactive, indicate date of cessation of mining. Date
(b) Is this stoppage permanent? Yes No.
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last calendar year. (Previous calendar year.)
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres'
(d) Mine Excavation 20 Acres
TOTAL 20 Acres
3. Estimate the total new acreage to be affected by mining in the current calendar year. 20
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control and locate on updated mine map.
Drainage from plant goes into flooded pit.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last calendar year and delineate each
area on updated mine map. -
(a)
Tailings ponds
0 Acres
(c)
Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b)
Stockpiles
0 Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation 0 Acres
(CONTINUED ON
REVERSE
SIDE)

f
6.. Describe reclamation listed in Item 5 a-d carried out in last calendar year.
Re aired ullies in reclaimed areas as ne
Name of person responsible for reclama
Signature of company officer or owner:
Complete and return by February
updated mine map to:
Land Quality Section
D-NRCD
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Worth T. Sellers
Title: Vice President & General Manager
Date: May 12, 1987
1 two copies of this form along with two copies of an

EXISTING ACTIVE PIT
EXISTING PROPERTY
NEW PROPERTY
i
9

1,
it

y m
State of North Carolina 0 2
Department of Natural Resources dr Community Development > Z✓ Cp
Division of. Land Resources r" G
Land Quality Section ,T )co
C
9
" ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT 'o
Z
shall, by February l of each year during the life of the permitted operation, and within'30
completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with the Department a
reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
of
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
Name of Mine Castle Hayne . County New Hanover - - Permit Number - "65-1
Name of Company/Owner Martin Marietta Aggregates
Official Mailing, Address P. O. Box 398, Castle Hayne,'NC Zip Code" 28429
Telephone( 919 ) 675-2283 Check ifchange of address or telephone
1. (a) if mine is now inactive,, when did mining stop? Date
(b) is this stoppage permanent? Yes No.
2. List by category the total amount of new land affected by mining activities in the 1988 calendar
year and locate each area on your, updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 0.0 acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: 21.0 acres.
_(B) WASTE PILES: 0.0 acres. _ _ _ (E) PLANT AREA: 0.0 acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: 0.0 "acres. _ --
Check here if no acreage affected in 1988.'
3. Estimate by category the amount of new acreage to be affected by mining activities in the 1989
calendar year and locate the outline of each area on your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS_ PONDS: 0.0, acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: 30.0 acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: 0.0 acres. (E) PLANT AREA: 0.0 acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: 0.0 acres.
Check here if no new acreage is to be affected in 1989.
4. List by category the total amount of disturbed and unreclaimed land present at this site at the end
of the 1988 calendar year. _ .
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 125.0 'acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: 435.0 acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: Pit acres. (E) PLANT AREA: 10.0 acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: 20.0 acres.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
NOTE: WASTEPILES should include overburden storage/disposal areas and berms.

'T
•
5. List by category the amount of land that has been completely reclaimed in 1988 and is not subject
to continued: use in future mining related activities.. Briefly describe the reclamation worm
conducted and indicate if you wish to have any of these areas released from your current bonding
requirements. Accurately locate the outline of all such areas on your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: acres. Explain:••• w
(B)
WASTE PILES:
Release Requested:
acres. Explain:
Yes No
_
(C)
STOCKPILES:
Release Requested:
acres. Explain:
Yes No
(D)
MINE EXCAVATION:_
Release Requested:
acres. Explain:
Yes No
(E)
PLANT AREA:
Release Requested:
acres. Explain:
Yes No
Release Requested: Yes No
Check - here if no reclamation conducted in 1988.
Person responsible for reclamation (please print): W. T. $ell rs
Signature of company officer or owner:
• Completeand return by February 1
• map to:
Land Quality Section
D-NRCD
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Title: Vice President do General Manager-'
Date:
two copies of this form along with two copies of an updated mine
FAILURE TO FILE THIS FORM BY THE DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES AND COULD EVEN RESULT IN THE REVOCATION OF YOUR MINING PERMIT.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 9 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor October 9, 1987 Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
Mr. Dean Hardy
Area Production Manager
Martin -Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 398
Castle Hayne, Korth Carolina 28429
RE*. Castle Hayne Quarry
Pender County
Dear Mr. Hardy:
As you remember, a meeting was held at the Castle Hayne Quarry in mid July
to discuss what remaining reclamation work was needed in Mine Areas 2, 3 and 4
prior to their being released from further reclamation responsibility with
respect to the Mining Act of 1971. Past reclamation efforts were reviewed and
areas needing further work were identified. Specific recommendations were made
at the site concerning the means to correct the problems noted.
A copy of my rough notes on our findings were left with you at the end of
the meeting. The following is'an itemized list of the areas in need of
additional work.
MINE AREA 3:
1. Topdress, reseed and mulch the previous repair work at the extreme
northwest pit corner. A rip/rap channel to convey runoff down slope into
the lake area is needed.
2. The spatial relationship of the railroad right-of-way to the existing
southern pit boundary must be identified.
3. The pit slopes immediately north of the railroad must be provided with a
permanent groundcover sufficient to restrain erosion. Several sections of
these slopes are severely under cut and will have to be regraded in order
to establish a groundcover. Diversions should be provided at the top of
these slopes to direct runoff to stable drop inlets. For those slopes that
can not be regraded to an angle which a permanent vegetative cover can be
established because of their proximity to railroad right-of-way, the use of
mechanical methods of slopes stabilization should be explored. The slopes
along the southern pit boundary immediately north of the railroad line must
be permanently stabilized before they can be favorably considered for
release.
PO Boot 27687, Rakigh, North Carolina 27611-7697 Tckphone 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Af inr nw Action Employer

Mr. Hardy
October 9, 1987
Page 2
MINE AREA 4•
1. The highvall area at the west-southwest pit corner must be .eliminated.
Reclamation Condition No. 2B of your mining permit calls for elopes down to
water lines to be 3:1 or flatter.
2. Slopes on the east and vest sides of the drainage channel entering the lake
area at the southwest comer must be graded to as .angle that a permanent
vegetative ground cover can be established on and than revegetated.
3. A rip -rap channel is needed at the south-southeast comer to convey surface
runoff originating south of the pit into the lake area. Previous attempts
- to repair this area have met with limited success. The area needs ,to be
regraded providing terraces to direct runoff into the channel instead of
allowing it to travel the entire length of the cut slope.
4. Perimeter elopes around the entire lake area are generally 3:1 or flatter
except for the last 20-30 feet or more directly above the waterline which
is often 1:1 or steeper. Reclamation Condition No. 2B of your mining
permit requires that slopes above the waterline shall be 3:1 or flatter.
This requirement stems, in part, from public safety considerations and the
need to provide access to the lake area for wildlife and recreational
purposes. In light of the considerable efforts put forth thus far in
trying to reclaim these slopes and the safety problems you stated that were
encountered when conducting this work, it was suggested that you provide
this office with a map illustrating selected sections around the lake area
that can be realoped to the required angle. Upon of review of this map you
will be advised as to the acceptability of the proposal.
5. The roadway (and ditchlines) traversing the northern portion of the area
must be stabilized.
It 1s highly recommended that a(heavy �be used immediately following
reseeding in the repair areas outlined above. I believe you will find that the
additional initial expense involved in using a mulch will be very cost effective
over time. Also, a filter fabric or washed atone (No. 57) liningshouldbe
placed under the rip/rap channels to prevent scouring of the natural ground.
Should you have any questions on any of the above please advise at (919)
733-4574.
Sincerely,
ThU"s ✓�
omas'E. Carroll, Y.E.
Mining Specialist
TEC/sl
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, P.E.
Ms. Carol Cameron

�(Gw:�;'YtDr�c-�c- -7 i`�a 8,•, D�GaQf�-�cve`CS ��wl��X�,�ce
c
6Te i CJP L I e�GlA�wt a�/P C� l
recce 3 t (� BV �We e�
��aa 4�n✓ ear}+ o
,c 1

I
I
i
i
I i
�
'�
'�
�
p
r,
i
�
1�
I I
I
I�
I
1
j
i�
1
JAI--�'�
I
-
--
-
�_
_ _
y��f�y.
_�
'
'
'
I
' �
�
1
I
1
�
�
I
I
I
1
��
I
�
�
�.
�.
I
� i i
I
i}
i
j,
I
I
�
�
i
�
'I
' '
� 1
I
i
i.
�
`
I ��
i t �
I
i
i.
i
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
'i
I
I
'•
I
f
I
�
1
f t,;
3
i
j�
1
i
I
`
i I
i �
I
i�
j
i
I�
i � I�
� i
�
I I
1
I
I
_
i
�
�
��
�
� I
�f
I
�
i
I
�
�
I I
1•
'
''
�
��
I
r�
�
� I
11
i
I 1.
l�
i�
� i
I
", �
i
�
i
i
��
I
f I l
a
t
i
l
i
l
l
l
i
l
j
i
l i
l
i
I
i
i �
I
�
I
,
;
�
i
1 1
�
l i
l
�
I
� I
�'
' �
�,
i
�
i I
�
! I
i
�, I
i
�
�
I
I
��
i
�
�
4 i
I,
'�
��
�
�
I
�' �
I
I
�
i
�
1
I
i
,
�
1
I
1
I I
'.
I
�
!.
I
I
I
�
�
�
•
i
I
1
II
i
�
�
�.
I
I
'.
t
�
�
�,
�
�
I
I
�
�
I
I
� j
i
�
f
I
I
1
�
�
�
{
I
li
��
:
i
�
I
i
i!
�
��
�
�
�
I
�
i
j i
i
I
�
I
�
,
I
�
L
�
� I
I
I i
�
�

co 4eA gk—�O.n..UC
A)CJ earv��
— u9eA4e. � t t33
�y'L4� �� l� ���//l �r9i `�J�.p-v'`^'e- �q��l� rS'B�7'T�61- Oi' ✓�G.-. fi'lun-�.
�^oapi Y� l•19a-t�I, it

rf
MINE INSPECTION REPORT J
Land Quality Section
Wilmington Regional Office t
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmingiony .N,�C'1 28��F��. S . I
(919)256—G161
1. Company: 2. County:
3, Mine: 4. Permit No. '
5. Person Contacted: I_ n 61 Date Inspected 1 !._
7. Pictures: Videotape S11des�I Other
B. Was mine active on date of inspection? Yee No
9. Erosion Control Measures taken.
fO. Describe any offsite damage.
11
u. waste ursposai measures tawen.
13. Is Annual Reclamation Report form accurate? )Yes I No
If no, explain
14. Reclamation accomplished since last inspection. No. of acres
15. Reclamation measures needed.
16. Other recommendations 6 comments:
17. Were recommendations made to operator.at site? Yee - No
18. Follow-up inspection needed?
19. Copy sent tojoperator?
INSPECTED BY: -
a
Yea No
Yes (date) No

MINE INSPECTION REPORT
; - ,
Land Quality Section
Wilmington Regional Office-
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
'
Wilmington, NC, 2840&3.�,u.
(9195 25624161'
.r
1.
Company:
2. County:��-
N
3,
Mine:
4. Permit No.
5,
Person Contacted:
., j_ ;� 6) Date
Inspected_:.i-
(� _ ,�ri•ti �-
7.
Pictures: Videotape
Slides }
Other�G
S.
Was mine active on date of inspection? Yee No ,i
9.
Erosion Control Measures taken,
�r�VN-I l.11 �� /-'ll .o \ l �.i
iVN c /. , u. , •^ -- a ,
.✓
.�I �
10.
Describe any offsite damage.
I ++
1
11.
12. Waste Disposal measures taken.
13. Is Annual Reclamation Report fotm accurate? l
If no, explain
14. Reclamation accomplished since last inspection
15. Reclamation measures needed.
No. of acres
16. Other recommendations a comments:
17.. Were recommendations made to operator .at 'cite? Yes - No
18., Follow-up inspection needed? Yes No
. 19:.Copy sent to operator? Yes (date
INSPECTED BY:
V
No
_..

MINE INSPECTION REPORT
Land Quality Section
Wilmington Regional Office
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
1. Company: 2. County:
3. Mine: 4. Permit No.
5. Person Contacted: 6. Date Inspected
7. Pictures: Videotape Slides Other
8. Was mine active on date of inspection? Yes No
9. Erosion Control Measures taken.
10. Describe any offsite damage.
11. Are public safety provisions in compliance with permit?
12. Waste Disposal measures taken.
13. Is Annual. Reclamation Report form accurate? Yes No
If no, explain
14. Reclamation accomplished since last inspection. No.•of acres
15.. Reclamation measures needed. '
16. Other recommendations & comments:
17.. Were recommendations made to operator-at'site? Yes
18'. Follow-up inspection needed?
19.,Capy sent to operator?
,INSPECTED BY:
Yes No
Yes (date) No
No

August 14, 1986
MEMORANDUM
T0: Tom Carroll
FROM: Harlan Britt 40JJ�_
SUBJECT: Request for Release
Castle Hayne Quarry
Martin -Marietta
On Wednesday August 13, 1986 Gerald Kraynak, Horace Wilson and I inspected
the subject mine for release of areas from permit. The following are my
comments concerning that review.
Site #1 - Area is under active mining operations and can not be released at
this time.
Site #2 - Additional work has to be done to get final stabilization and
Martin Marietta indicates they will submit for release at a later time.
Work to be done includes minor regrading of spoil piles and vegetation.
Site #3 - Vegetation is very good over entire area except an area adjacent
to the water line along the interior island. There exist along the island
shoreline an approximately 10 foot 1:1 or steeper slope without vegetation.
This highwall may not be serious as it is accessible only by boat from
adjoining property. There is one large gully located at the northwest
corner of the pond that should be repaired and stabilized before release is
granted.
I would suggest that markers be erected at the eastern water line of the
pond in this site to delineate areas released for site 3 from areas in Site
2. Site 3 would be from the markers westward to I-40 as shown on the
attached.
Site #4 - The locations which have problems are numbered and referenced on
the attached drawing.
t AREA (1): A highwall existing in this area must be eliminated. A large
gully must also be repaired.
AREA (2): Insufficient ground cover exist along the slopes of this area
and a highwall. approximately 10 feet high exist along the water line.
Permit calls for a minimum 3:1 slopes according to Jim Simons.

AREA (3): Small highwall condition exist in this area.
AREA (G): Large gullies and an area approximately 50 feet wide exist
without vegetative cover. r�G-„
Vf AREA (5): The area north of the pond (site 4) has very little permanent
vegetation. The small grain is basically all that exist with very sparse
signs of lespedeza survival. Small to large gullies have begun to appear
on the northern slopes of this area with a large gully problem existing
`� along the access road parallel to the railroad tracks. Gully areas are
indicated in red on the attached map.
The entire northern shoreline of the pond in this site has an unvegetated
highwall approximately 10 feet high. I am unsure as to what we should
require however the permit, according to Jim Simons, requires 3:1 or
flatter.
I would not recommend release of this area until the above problems are
satisfactorily resolved.

159 Al
i
Liln
4

:.,.
- _ _ ,.p.
���

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
Mr. Tom Carole
Acting Mining Specialist
Division of land Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Subject: Request for Release
Castle Hayne Quarry
Mined Out Pits #1, #2, #3 and #4
Dear Mr. Carole:
IkIECtI V E D
jUL 1© 06
P.O. BOX 30013 OALI��f SCION
RALEIGH, N.G. 27622-00LAND
TELEPHONE [phone]
July 9, 1986
We have recently completed a very extensive reclamation program at our
Castle Hayne Quarry, which is adjacent to I-40 just north of Wilmington.
All mining activities west and north of the existing crushing plant have
been completed. Exposed areas above the water line have been graded and
seeded with an adequate vegetative cover.
All future mining activity Will take place east of the crushing plant on
property leased from Ideal Basic Industries. The four flooded pits are
shown on the attached aerial photo. Total acreage for all four pits amounts
to 520 acres.
We trust that this request meets with your approval. Please give me a call
if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
Horace Willson
Manager
Environmental Services
HW/oe
Attachment

y
�Gwlkdyk
011L

77AME
YAM

��Y
r�1

February 1, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: Tom Carroll CV -
RE: Martin Marietta Aggregates
Castle Hayne Quarry
An onsite meeting was held on 7/7/88 in reference to 10/9/87 letter from T.
Carroll to Dean Hardy. The following are field notes compiled during the site
inspection. A copy of the original handwritten notes were provided to the mine
manager, Butch Barnhardt. Also in attendence were H. Willson, M. Little & Tracy
Davis.
Mi nr:� Araa '3
Item 1: Work completed - water has been diverted. Rip -rap in place. Sparse
bahiagrass and bermudagrass. Bermudagrass starting to run quite well
± kobe lespedeza. Area is releaseable.
Item 3: Rip -rap has been selectively placed in two areas, stake planting of
willow with wax myrtles set out - generally quite sparse. Additional
plantings to be done this year (fall). Suggestion was made to utilize
bark mulch (strippings) with plantings.
Bare mounds on south and north sides of road in area separating Area 2
from Area 3 needs reseeding - very sparse vegetation. Again,
recommendation was made on use of bark mulch when reseeding is done.
Mine Area 4
Item 1: Highwall eliminated. Slope at approximately 3:1 - looks good.
Item 2: as above - black locust are fairly abundant, area was seeded with rye
grain and cover crop with kobe, sericea ± fescue. Natural drainage
channel at SW corner - minor bank erosion on repaired channel - wax
myrtles and willows planted along stream channel should do the job on
longterm basis but additional willow stakings are needed on 4 x 4
spacing.
Item 3: Gravel mulch applied to most of area when it was reseeded - good cover
crop of rye grain but sparse permanent vegetation at this time. One
area on western slope of gut (inlet) was not mulched - all vegetation
is very sparse and gullies developing. Needs to be mulched heavily
and topdressed. Runoff from south of pit area has been directed away
from slope - should help a great deal in establishing a permanent
vegetative cover.

Martin Marietta Aggregates
February 1, 1989
Page 2
Item 4 Walked entire southern perimeter of Mine Area 4. Vegetation on flat
and gently sloping areas is very well established. Several access
points along the southern and northern slopes exist that would provide
fair to good access in/out of the lake area - these appear
satisfactory but should be identified on a site map as was originally
requested.
Item 5 Roadway and ditchlines are still in need of repair (see photos).
Recommend riprap ditchline ( 75-100') and stabilize roadbanks which
are presently undercutting - primarily RR side (northside).
Alternative would be to Trove road southward and use resulting fill to
backfill along northern slope to a min. 2:1 angle preventing any need
to encrouch into RR right-of-way. Reestablish ditchline and riprap
for permanent stabilization.
Note: 10/9/87 letter stressed need to use mulch on any repair areas - it
didn't appear that this was done to any great extent.. Again, highly
recommend use of bark mulch if available - if not use small grain
straw to provide min. of 80% ground cover. If using grain straw need
to crip or tack.
TEC:se
cc: Dan Sams

W
r
U
4
x-�T
�z
yy5
•t
a
// 1rggg
d
°1
_Ll
0
0

- � - W`," �- C ? _ ���.. • ,�.�y }�`'ra `� -+� ;;. �- J, j,5 `F�+�:.�CL �4'i�,A Ion' C.� � �� � � � '' -
r • a Nyl� 4,,1- `5��wryJ,;�c•?�.�—'J� '.,vli , :� Cr /� o
tic
b 'w-i' C •' *
' �1 ',O C�� � , ',. • y�v D^ nu7--.+�� _ � - f.� i1 �y'L}.k .'�.t Y'� -ry
C `+i :. ufi r'.'T''be. �s� r v•� b� - o r ilo O
bo
�c �G ��•. � � ' �' ''r' '' S . F'� ti r, - 1 •c ''=a ' - a 'e, e V !r r .''
A.
�. � ..� � may, � t7 .� t• _ -:: - �,
o ,
r.
-Y-" r�.�'�� - 5, i _5��, �: y ,fin---_ �y - , �f�j� _FJ. '•'-'e =if- a
s:
h, r` n. !� �� ^•S' t 7f ., -i ��' Q s �• 'Ct ! .:,�.-try -.
,.. �. � r.�J � ; �.A �O 9 8 wri 'CG . n i ! • � � �'! .. ' _ S' .' _ : ti '. Y �;. `:ri'r. �"' yy
� �' ►i.r, Q G �``� G a. � ` � � l4 si�'f�' � f� ".^' , � `.'s'� � �j.'� jC{ 'v } t� "'`j"-'
V •7•.S m•i <.� C YYYY �ft�,,Y �•.,6�Y1yM'�' �r �,F \' ,4
o /.'' 41' a`i�,�wk1� '� �'� � ''� ,,'(ij/C,f r ' ,`rJ•��.T� �r � J • �`"
Mir,
� � � r�,>.o. ���!' � � � ��� � �w,'^'Y �`��F " �SY � ! '�a�R � ],a 4� 'F � y � 4 _y► y �r � '1 `
`� �,,,,rr + f � •'_-' � O ,may ';
c -

9
.�. .�.isiyM��nr• r ".• a1'.': i'tyd��'Y-�SF�"%L':
DIVISION OF
Ad, �Atd North Carolina Department of Natural LAND RESOURCES
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
W4 Resources &Community Development Box 27687, Raleigh 27611
Eames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary Telephone [phone]
June 5, 1981
Mr. Robert Edwards
rilLrtin Marietta Corporation
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Re: Castle Hayne .Quarry
New Hanover County
Dear' Mu . Edwards :
As requested., the Castle Hayne Quarry permit has been modified to provide
for an earthen berm along State Road 1002, Permit condition number 8 (page 4)
has been changed as follows:
A buffer strip 200 feet wide or wider shall be maintained between
the top edge of any mine excavation and the highway right-of-way
of State Road 1002. The buffer strip may either be undisturbed
utilizing existing trees and vegetation for visual screening or
may be a combination of an earthen bean and undisturbed buffer.
If an earthen berm is used, the sideslopes of the berm shall be
graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slope or flatter. The toe of
the berm shall be at least 50 feet from the right--of-way line for
State Road 1002. The berm shall be seeded in appropriate trees
and grasses during the earliest :favorable planting season after
construction for stability and visual screening. The 50 foot
buffer betveen the toe and the highway right-of-way shall remain
undisturbed except to install any required sediment control measures
for the berm or to improve visual screening.
I am also enclosing a revised page 4 of the permit with this modification.
Please discard the previous page 4 and insert this page.
This modifi-cation should fulfill your request. However, please advise
should you have any question concerning this matter.
Sincerely, � t
Dames D. Sins, C.P.G.S. , P.E.
/ Simons,
Specialist
Land Quality Section
JDS/ch
cc: Gerald Kraynak
Cin llkh.tical Survey Section-733-2423; Georiutie Sutvvy Sc.rtiun-733-383G; Land Otrality .`aer--tiori-7:33.4574; Ptanning acid tnventury Suctiwn-733.3833;
Lami Resources Information Service-733-2090
Are CqualOppurruniry AI firmalive Acrioto Employer

November 13, 1981
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Bingham
FROM: Stephen 0. Conrad
SUBJECT: I-40 Buffer Zone at Castle Hayne Quarry
I understand that the Interstate 40 right-of-way will cross property
under control of Martin Marietta which contains mineable limestone. This
area has historically contained sinkholes resulting from voids within the
limestone. Sinkhole activity near the existing quarry appears to have been
accelerated by quarry dewatering. Concern exists that quarry expansion
could cause sinkhole activity along the I-40 embankment.
As you know, future sinkhole activity is difficult to predict. Many
factors besides the quarry dewatering, including highway construction itself
could cause sinkhole activity along the right-of-way. Under The Mining Act
of 1971, reasonable protection should be provided to the highway. A buffer
strip would provide protection. However, with the information now available,
it would be difficult to require in the mining permit that the operator main-
tain a 200 foot (rather than 100 foot) wide buffer between the quarry operation
and the right-of-way. Ne will be happy to reconsider this matter should add-
itional information come to light.
Please advise if we can be of further assistance.
.
SGC:JDS:pg
cc: Gerald Kraynak

ROUTING SLIP
Simons
Gardner I
Conrad
PLEASE SIGN AND COMMENT

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Date �/� 19�
To: /
Remarks: SV- G ✓I /�
Wkil
NaloN
Neb eM flM
❑ Nme, InIMI eM lerwrk
❑ NON .na Mum N ...
D Yw N m� pw"
NM W r ro Lnn NiY
❑ Nr ywr Nl"",
❑ Nr Y r sn=..I
O N•P" "wy Ni my Nanww•
❑ Nr ew
O pr Ink...N. 1O. m. m mpv
up" yow
O PI'me .ww wun .epr to me
9Nurn wl,h men deNh
Ie Iv IIIM

IMPORTANT
To
Date— Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
Phone
AREA CODE
NUMBER "TENSION
Message
Signed
TELEPHONED
N.
PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WILL CAII AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE VOU
URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
C. Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Development

ROUTING SLIP
SIMON
GA i f.Hf�
CONRAD
PLCASR SIGH AND =SffNT

TY�'IGAL, 5EG r:7 �%''ti^G^jEV—
f
4-e
� CiK• EL.. Zi>.GC�
�
„
1 t�� ice„=`iur, t,��
�u� Willi ®ni iii;
'foLj
1-/,nTcrz
it
F¢K
K 11
STATC c
Fri KL"i S L c T
1 00 Z.
IGAL�: 1//_ 4c'

Zz
JL o -I 5' 1?i I. -I
uj ri iql=t; l=
�ll�ilil�lll-�ilil-�lU �!111��!111=-.1111= illt�� 111 Ji�1:�.11�1 � 1= I
�CSG I t?a 31\ y
•J -73�5; �Ib'71

: North Carolina Department of Natural
®� Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Gavernor Joseph W. Grimsiey, Secretary
February S, 1982
Mr. Robert W. Edwards
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622
RE: Castle Mayne Quarry
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
DIVISION OF
LAND RESOURCES
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Telephone [phone]
We have reviewed the request in your January 12, 1982 letter that the
two hundred foot wide buffer requirement along S.R. 1002 be reduced to one
hundred feet. The basis of your request was that only a one hundred foot
wide buffer would be required adjacent to the new I-40 right-of-way.
The primary reason for the buffer is to protect the roadway from sinkhole
activity related to quarry activity. After consultation with the Geotechnical
Section of the Department of Transportation and our own review, we continue to
believe that a two hundred foot wide buffer should be retained along S.R. 1002
for the following reasons.
Some fairly recent sinkhole related slumping has already occurred
within the right -of --way of S.R. 1002 and adjacent areas. The
timing of this slumping appears to coincide with quarry expansion
and dewatering.
2. Whereas additional engineering to protect against sinkholes was
added to the design of the I-40 base,.no such protection exists
under S.R. 1002 since this road predates the quarry.
3. The right-of-way of S.R. 1002 is relatively narrow compared to the
right-of-way of I-40.
4. The buffer also provides protection to neighboring houses in the area.
As you know, future sinkhole activity is difficult to predict. Consequently,
the designation of a buffer width for subsurface protection is somewhat arbitrary
without detailed study. Based on what we have been able to determine so far,
we believe that the.two hundred foot requirement along S.R. 1002 is reasonable.
However, we will be happy to review any data you may have to the contrary or
any proposed mitigating measures such as limiting quarry dewatering, etc. .
Geological Survey Section-733.2423: Geodetic Section-733-3836; Land Qualitv Section-733-4674; Planning anti invtmtory Section-733-3831
Lame: Resources Information Service-733.2090 Bo. 27687 Raleian 27611.7687

Mr. Robert W. Edwards
Page Two
February 4, 1982
Naturally, you also have the right to formally present your request
to the Department and the Mining Commission.
Please advise if I can provide further clarification.
Sin erely,
amen D. Simons, C.P.G.S., P..
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JDS:pg
cc: Gerald Kraynak
W. D. Bingham

Chas ` J �r Tar 4r�fo✓Q ��
-r A 'Dave ,e- JAAn, C7 dr
'ODdm T�,s{ �o/7�r /e{��r �,s d•rW�
W to ." ar wdh W,if crss 740S
44 r-/� Ve
C-
F-ro trV\
/ro r yo u v i e +.0
i g8y

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
James Simons
Land Quality Section, NRCD
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Dear Jim,
SOUTHEAST DIVISION
P. 0. BOX 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622
TELEPHONE [phone]
r-^
January 12, 1982� W7
�r
LAND QUALITY SECTION
We have been advised that only a one hundred foot buffer will be
required along the Wilmington -Benson Freeway at Castle Hayne Quarry.
As you know, we are required to leave a buffer of two hundred feet
along State road 1002.
In view of the one hundred foot buffer requirement along the Wilmington -
Benson Freeway we would like to request that you review our permit
number 65-1 and consider allowing us to also have a one hundred foot
buffer along State road 1002 instead of the two hundred foot buffer
which is now required.
I will be happy to meet with you and discuss this matter at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
`17, 1-'
Robert W. Edwards
RWE/bd

I!
DIVISION OF
North Carolina Department of Natural LANp RESOURCES
Stephan G. Conrad, Director
Resources &Community Development Box 27087, Ratelgh 27611
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary Talophona 910 733.3833
March 17, 1981
Mrs. Lee Mims
Martin Marietta Aggregates Corporation
P. 0. Sox 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
RE: Renewal of Castle Bayne Quarry Permit
New Hanover County ,
Dear Mrs. Mims:
Enclosed is the renewed mining permit #65-1 for the Castle
Hayne Quarry. The renewed permit was amended to add the +184
additional acres south of the existing mine and east of the pro-
posed Interstate 40. It does not include the Reasor Chemical
Co. Tract.
Please review the permit and advise should you have any
question concerning the permit conditions.
Sincerely,
ames D. Simons, P. E.
Mining Specialist
JDS:pg
cc: Jerry Kraynak
enclosure
Geological Survey Soctivn--7: Geodetic Survey Section-733-3838; Land Gualiry Section--733.4574: Planning and Inventory Section-733.3833;
Land Resources Information Service-733.2090
Ao E4ww ck,po,runhy,,A[firma rive Action Employer
' ,S*'. : � •! : i ire.. _r �;f!' � � �

7? nlo..GS-!
.issued -7-ao-7a
�xP�:-es'7 ao-Ff�
State of North Carolina
®Pi Department of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
Application ^for a Mining Permit
Article 7 of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Caroline, 'The
Mining Act of 1971" ...After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in
mining without having first obtained from the Department an operating
permit which covers the affected land and which has not terminated, been
.revoked, been suspended for the period in question, or otherwise become
invalid.
i
.1. Name of Mine Castle Bayne Quarry County New Hanover
.2. Name of Company Superior Stone Co.. Div. of Martin Marietta Corp.
3. Home Office Address 414 Fayetteville Ste, Pe 0e Box 2479,
Raleigh, N. C. 27602
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail (same as above)
Telephone [phone]
'S. Mine Office Address P. 0. Box 398, Castle Hayne, N. Ce 28429
Telephone [phone]
6. Mine Manager D. We Sullivan
We hereby certify that all details
contained in this Permit Applica-
tion are'true and correct to the
best of our knowledge. We fully
understand that any willful mis'
representation of facts will be
cause for permit revocation.
*Signature
Title y6WPres. Planning & Development
Date z !4 g 4 /974
*Signature of company officer required.
IF

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site for which permit is requested:
Acres owned .,212 Acres leased Nn1e
2. Materials mined: Marine Limestone crushed stone
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge ❑ Underground
Shovel and Truck Dragline and Truck Q Self -loading Scraper
Other
4. Present depth of mine 35 1 ,
5. Expected maximum depth of mine
6. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on -your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive as
of July 1, 1972: None
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site None
B. Determination of Affected Acreage and Bond.
I.. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage:
a'. Area used for tailing ponds (in depleted pit)
b. Area used for stockpiles
c. Area used for waste piles
d. Area used for processing plants
e. Area of active mine excavation as of July 1, 1972
f. Estimate annual acreage of new land disturbed by
mining 8
g. Estimate total land disturbed by mining that is
subject to reclamation by multiplying Item 2f by 3=
TOTAL OF 2a through 2g
20 acres
6 acres
0 acres
2 acres
50 acres
24, acres
102 acres.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Castle Hayne
C.
3. Check acreage to be bonded: Total affected acreage figure from 8,
2 equals acreage to be bonded.
0
- 4.99 acres
($ 2,500.bond)
5
- 9.99 acres
($ 5,000
bond)
10
- 24.99 acres
($12,500
bond)
®
25+
acres
($25,000
bond)
4. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining opera-
tions in North Carolina? Yes L&1 No
Check the amount of blanket bond:
$2,500 ❑ $12;500
$5,000 ❑ $25,000
1. What aspect of your mining operation may have significant effect on wild-
life, or freshwater, estuarine or marine .fisheries?
(See Attachment No. 1)
2. Is there a waste water discharge from your plant or mine?
Yes Q Na
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of Water
and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
Document not received to date.
074-OYP-2000076 Expiration Date
b. Is there an air contaminant emission from your mine or plant?
Yes F1 No
If yes, indicate the approval document number issued by the Office of
Water and Air Resources, Department of Natural and Economic Resources,
Document not received to date.
65-72-09-0017 Expiration Date
3. If your mining excavation will come within 300 feet of any neighboring
E

Castle Hayne
Attachment No. 1
C-1
Waste water From plant is thoroughly settled in the depleted pit
area before being discharged into Sturgeon Creek at a point approxi-
mately 2000 feet below the junction of the creek and Northeast Cape
Fear River. Future plans call for the diversion of Sturgeon Creek
by a proposed ditch to existing drainage area west of present
operation so that mining can begin on Area II as shown on attached
map. A settling pond is planned on Area II until sufficient acreage
is available in the pit to provide adequate settling area. Since
all waste water is thoroughly settled before discharge into adjacent
drainage areas, our operation should have no significant effect on
wildlife,,or freshwater, estuarine, or marine fisheries.

APPLICATION FOR A -MINING PERMIT -
dwelling house, school, church, hospital, commercial or
industrial building, public building or public road,
describe methods to prevent physical hazard to such features.
Blasting will be conducted so as to prevent damage by thrown
rocks and from excessive vibration. Any natural feature, such
as hedgerow of trees or ridges, will be left undisturbed.
Where necessary rows of trees will be established between
excavation and neighboring property or Vegetated -earth berm
will be established. Reasonable safeguards, such as guard
rails, fences, and oversize rocks will be located as close to
dangerous openings as possible.
Describe measures to be taken to insure against (1) substantial
deposits of sediment in stream beds or lakes, (2) landslides,
(3) acid water pollution.
(1}. Substantial deposits of sediment in stream beds and lakes will
be prevented by establishing a stable slope angle in unconsoli-
dated material. Waste water from plant and storm runoff carry-
ing silt from spoils piles and active mining area will be
directed by drainage ditches or terraces to settling ponds
before discharging downstream. Revegetation will begin on
ditch banks and on spoils piles no longer in use as soon as
feasible after construction. .
(2) Measures taken to prevent landslides would include stripping
loose, unconsolidated material from the top of pit or quarry
wall for a safe distance, but in no case less than 10 feet;
this,unconsolidated material- will be sloped to the angle of
repose and revegetated if necessary to prevent erosion.
Mining methods shall be selected which will ensure wall and
bank stability, including benching as necessary to obtain a
safe overall slope.
(3) This operation does not yield acid water pollution.
3

Reclamation Plan
1. -Describe your intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all
affected lands and indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming
this land.
This operation is located in an area of New Hanover County zoned
for heavy industry; in addition to our operation there are two
existing plants: Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company and Ideal
Cement Company. Rail, truck, and barge facilities are available.
Our reclamation plan which has been in effect -since the start of
our operation calls for the casting of overburden back into
depleted pit area and the settling of waste water in the pit. This
material is to be used to reclaim land adjacent to and on the
elevation with the existing railroad. The remaining depleted pit
area will form a lake with access to the river. The reclaimed land
adjacent to the lake will be sloped and stabilized with vegetation
for Easy access and to prevent erosion; slope angle will not be
less than li:l. Such reclaimed land would provide future
industrial sites. A portion of our present stockpile area is
located on reclaimed land that was formerly depleted pit.

Reclamation Plan
2. Indicate what practices you will take to protect adjacent surface resources.
This permanent operation is bounded its west line by a portion of the town of
Castle Hayne; a large industrial area lies to the east; the northeast Cape
Fear River is on the north and a large undeveloped area lies to the south.
Overburden is back carted into the depleted portions of the excavation to be
used to reclaim a part of the depleted land for possible future industrial
sites.
3. State the method of prevention or elimination of conditions that will be
hazardous to animal or fish life in or adjacent to the affected areas:
This operation does not yield any toxic pollutants that would be hazardous to
animal or fish life. Water in ponds that remain on the property will be
accessible to and suitable for wildlife use. Ramps and access roads into pit
will be left. Permanent ditches will be constructed with sloping banks
stabilized with vegetation to offer access and to prevent siltation.
4. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all
excavations in rock.
Reasonable safeguards, such as guard rails, fences, and berms, will be provided
as close to dangerous openings as possible. The face of overburden material
will be set back at least 10 feet from quarry wall and sloped to the angle of
repose. Mining methods will be selected which will ensure wall and bank
stability, including benching as necessary to obtain a safe overall slope.
Whenever possible, natural wooded areas adjacent to pit will remain undisturbed,
or species.of trees native to the area will be planted.
5. Describe plans, if any, for screening operations from public view.
Existing trees that serve as a view screen will be left uncut; or trees native
to the area will be planted. Where necessary,,berms will be constructed from
spoils according to sound land reclamation practices.
6. State the method of rehabilitation of settling ponds if to be reclaimed
during the life of the permit.
Settling ponds at this site are expected to be in use during the life of this
permit.
2

Reclamation Plan
7. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of mining refuse:
No chemical contaminants are used in this mining process. Unusable scrap
metal is stockpiled and sold. Other mining refuge, including waste rock,
is incorporated in spoils piles or in the construction of protective berms.
8. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of stream channels and
stream beds to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution:
The attached map shows the proposed diversion of Sturgeon Creek by ditch and
natural drainage before beginning mining operation on Area II. This ditch
and any future permanent stream channel for the creek will be constructed to
a gradient, width, and depth as near as possible like that prior to mining.
Banks will be sloped to the angle of repose and stabilized with vegetation
and/or rip -rap to minimize erosion.
9. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting
or remaining in mined areas.
The nature of our mining operation produces an excavation well below the
natural stream elevations, thus our abandoned pits will become fresh water
ponds discharging clean water downstream.
10. Describe how the surface gradient in unconsolidated materials will be re-
stored to a condition suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land
after reclamation is completed and proposed method of accomplishment:
As stated in the reclamation plan, a portion of the depleted pit area will be
reclaimed for future industrial sites; the remaining pit area will form a lake
adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. A surface gradient will be
established wherein no slope will be greater than 34 degrees; reclaimed land
adjacent to the proposed lake will be sloped and stabilized with vegetation
to prevent erosion.
3

Ngw H/.VevEe CA6O1< .HAY�✓.E {Au.9.e'¢Y -,45�
Reclamation Plan
11. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the
affected areas. Note requirement of Regulation Number 1.
The affected land as outlined in this permit and shown on the
attached map is expected to be in use beyond the maximum
permissible permit period, In the past it has been our policy
to establish ground cover of grasses and/or trees on earth
.berms, dikes, and dams as soon as practical after construction;
and on spoils piles no longer in use.
For the purposes of this mining permit we plan to use the
following methods to establish vegetation on affected lands
subject to erosion:
1. Slopes in unconsolidated material will be kept at an
angle consistent with the nature of the material so
that the possibility of erosion is minimized and so
--that revegetation is feasible. _
2. A ground cover of grasses or legumes will be
established on affected areas such as earth berms,
dikes, dams, and abandoned stripped areas and.spoils,:
piles. We expect to use sericea lespedeza, love grass,
fescue, rye, or a combination of several of the above.
Lime and fertilizer will be applied as indicated by
soil test results.
3. Virginia or Loblolly pines will be planted where
necessary on affected areas along with the grasses
and legumes. Nursery grown seedlings will be planted
at a spacing to yield approximately 1000 trees per
acre.
4. It has been our practice in the past to employ pro.
fessional landscape contractors and tree planting
contractors to establish a suitable ground cover on
land subject to erosion and to improve the looks of
the operation as a whole; this practice will continue..
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
/��%
Title
Agency®
Date
2

Reclamation Plan
12. Provide a time schedule that meets the requirements of Section S of this Act.
Vie anticipate that, everywhere feasible, reclamaticn plans will be
conducted simultaneous with the mining operation. This will include
the proper sloping of spoils piles and unconsolidated earth cuts.
Deposition of z:aste r.material will be rnade in areas where subsequent
erosion into streams will be negative or at a a;iinimum and to the
best of our ability.
,then a spoils area is declared dead., we will comrience with
revegetation.
Following abandonment of the operation, we will within two years
revegetate all spoils piles and the plant area.
If settling ponds are large enough to retain as fresh water ponds,
providing silt and clay settles properly, they gill be left for
such purposes. If the pond has been filled up with sediment, we
will revegetate with appropriate ground cover.
5

LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right of entry and travel upon our lands or operation during -
regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field ---
inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the
administration of this Act, so long as the Department or its appointed
representatives are accompanied by an agent or representative of our
Company.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives
the right to make whatever entries on the land as may be reasonably
necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary
in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to
----- complete in the event -a bond forfeiture is' ordered pursuant to Section-14:----
O
*Signed ✓LGr�6
Tit Vice Pres. Planning 6 Development
. —M Castle Rayne Quarry
--company--Superior Stone Company
*Signature should be the same as the officer who signed the application for
a -permit. .

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
�AgTE
1 !) 80
TO:
REF, NO. OR ROOM. BLDG.
fir . �� � �ti r►�o�s
1
I.i � � C�
REF. NO, OR ROOM. BLDG.
FROM:
GTlON
Cl NOTE AND FILE PER OUR CONVERSATION
(�❑
ClNOTE AND RETURN TO ME JL1 PER YOUR REGU.ST
❑I RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL
{� NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION
❑ PLEASE ANSWER ❑ FOR YOUR COMMENTS
Cl PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ❑ SIGNATURE
❑ TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ❑ INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
47.
•I
+~ � I�IL
LAND. QUALI-fY S�.y

MEMO. o,.E �
TQ:Q'�
7 -
64:�
c
SAP 5����pN
N0. qax-0
North Carolina Department of'Naturai &Economic Resources

MEMO.
BnTE: �/3i t�(1
TO. r,/� SUBJECT: f �Oon sie,r
' roles S Qe6 !rMk3'WardJ A0c(at. Cont...,fl i%e ProPos+/
C<SFre f/gyAa Q 4.,r �xrpoas;on. 1 exlqre ,el r/e c
DosSihr� qro �1,dwe��,/s
;ekAd( Prori� ,ns anq
f4cla,nu/frm, Gt `rJnq c7�i✓e urt 05
tvorOCY V✓rr50„ W,V/ SVJ6 , f (- d w'P r! MOnr Joi ,.�y DrCn
G/5e
Fura.<1 Fo .C�ar,.�
�:xy6�MJ ooT G6=.,r
Pn55:6le
eFF.F a Fs;,kc✓%, a,
FF�o
.,..., 1 - v�,
°r0. /oral./_
IJ. o.T. wdh�s M e`r ✓:.w %{v `One�oso�L""�
%UG
��hk North Carolina Department of Natural
W Resources &Community Development

_ _ - _ _ —_—_ _—..__- ___ _. - __/.__ ___ //._. ._ • «br� an aria _ J-v/�. _ _ -
"T ✓O�'' ip-P� -fsroW w/ YO/,(nvb��w./ �o»w 7
"pby"
. - - �. f�_vJ, �fJ'�"-ems b>J1 -�A9 •ni s/1�-/).�m /b � SaJ/0��.�5 //Y ..._. _ •__
vY-_Sw
.. - OSOI S Z i
'V A -1,D Ap OM4m(�_ 7�i 3'U� %i( •/ / ���i✓I
_._.W/W... p i"s :�»YI-%nti/- i./-/ne-�r✓-S /psb>)Om n.v-plo:i..
• .(i� !w/oMb�In TA/.�A A9 11�L-/i b/a//fSbo?
s J I✓�•i/d/ 1 i
- --a ny -�`owa

}
.�
�
� �
'
'
�
•
�
�
, �
�
1
�
�
+
�
-
�
�
i
'
�
y
� 7
'
�.
�
'�/
1,
�
��
E
F
"'
''�
� �
�
F :
:.,
,
y
fy
?
C
4
�,
�
'
1,
�
t,i
.s�'
�
{
�
:�
r
k
�
�
� �
i-
�
+
`j
'.�
_
.`
�
,
i l
'
�_
t..
.', i
.}
r
f
� ,
,
�`
� �
is
i�
�
%
(� •,
� f
�
_{
�
.•
�
�
�
�
�
� r
� �
{
�'�
'
�
r_
��
�
�.••
r
�
� �'
r r
.y" ' .
!
�
���
�
i
�
-- - -
�
�
�
+—--
-�---
t
i

April 9, 1979
tom. Wr)1D A N7nt TW
0
TO: File
FROM: James D. Simons
SUBJECT: Martin Marietta Castle Hayne Quarry
Charles Gardner and Gerald Kraynak met with Horace Wilson of Martin Marietta
and the mine superintendent of the Castle Hayne site on April 6, 1979 to inspected
suspect sink holes near the quarry on the Seizemore property.
Charles indicated that the quarry was probably responsible for the sink
holes although it could not be absolutely proven. Charles recommended to Martin
Marietta that they stabilize the sink holes.
Reclamation of overburden piles is also needed.

i
,
•.
- .May 25, 1977 _. • ..
.
_.
` .
02LAAP11
.
TOt Dave Adsms ..
' 'FRCMt .:Charles Gardner.. ..
.
' 'SUBJ=c Martin MariettaCastleRayne Quarry -
•.As requestedy.we have'oontacted Charles Hollis, Corps of Engiheere, Wilmington
'office,
Regulatory Depertmarnti concerning mining .inthocypreae.. swamps adjacent to
.'Martin Marietta's, Caetle.Hayne Quarry. LHollis`'reported -that Martin Marietta had
-.
violated federal.regalaticros in the past by, constructing a'dike., along the Northeast-
Cape Fear River but no eaforcement action was anticipated for Ithe!previous violates.
.'
However) the Corps has notified the.company tliat,;amy,'tutura dike construction in
. the -swamp areas along the river will require -a "404" permit.. The Corps has toured'
the ewaivg areas in question with'rapreaentativea of Martin'Marietts, who have. sub-
mittafl an. application totheCcrpe..,�This application, was, returned to Martin Marietta
_
- as inadequate and a-iavised application had not.;been submitted, as' of, May 20t 1977..;..
_ As you mayjknow,-Martin Marietta submitted a dredge and :fill application to the
i
{
'Division of Marine Ffsheriant Department of Natural. and Economic Resources, but the
j
.. application xea.raturned to the 'compa" for additional information. It is anti—
" • cipated'- that ,a i•eviaed-application will be submitted In the near f4tur'e.L. ."•
'
- A mining permit was issued -by the Department of Natural and toonomic Resources,.,
,
• to Martin -Marietta for this quarry on July20, 1972. The 10' year permit includes L
'- ewampp areas on both sides. of Sturgeon Creek. I am attaching"a copy, of the, completed
.,, application for s.mining permit and a partial copyisf their.mine map submitted in
,
�. 1972 with the applicatione. .Also attached is a..USGS topo map with the approuimete
' per'mit area, indicated. L I L -
I IP
4,... Please advise if �cin provide Nu-tber information.or assistance.....-
,I
. .. , - ... .. .'
-
cot "Stephan G. Comad L I L

A.
i
,
ty'r
3
i.
i
t 4
lYA I A J '}` TAy t f 1+ . H !A r. 1�
U .SLJ )+ s3 y 4A AP!1.
YS g i. (! Y S�;l ! - tY ( 'Y b: f '.♦J.. �'-
I+M
n
.rA,A.[G r f ! .nr. t -r4 Ftl� ti4 •.AL.��. )!
•
r4
♦. y �v -. J.. f? tt ., '� (...^..7 . r$?f„«'��"j0'S Y..... h.;.,._.
r - } J -. ,
r
....'
., tr•n, ^a, >< s ,t r- ^t r 'WJ i rYf: s : , r.�4—A.
'.F r♦a .`bs Kt `•+� L "w 4A rr _
i.
11
.y r r q
S"-:t r L� . ! p n {. ): f
-i
{ 4n,IIIr ,, 4f .)a +li ,p.L Jed C'r— .`r
r
II
..
.1
+t f.�. ,'t4.' L3..� c.a act,. Gf , .i
., f i,. lh ra' F "1 <) '.a ! t5 u R -r �+. <:..i S•
A.`LN
tyi' a
w.^^a •• '�. !�> ... ixt +.4'6•`. A 1.
I
3.1 rlT`Hr'. 4,2� iV '^if{:y
-(l
..
••4RM L`r. •'I ro c'*:]f i✓ :,=ea i 45., ":'zr of
-
,,. ....'. .c
y.,.h' i ;.il« w.id' i +i? 11 *: +.'[Zv.�'-,. oF'.>'. �Tl ,i.A.
f
♦"':f
`i..P.dw .:A l{- ._f -.:.;� I1H, •.. t.,_J \.. 'VJY•-T... _ t. .`T^�`.#.;cC.,! �.'•i.F
AA A,
i..', c ma-f�>^�n. l i". >
4� -f'x. jT h. fAA A t i '.?�. •r 47 .a •;.j _ta -i
..'
-� �F
'
`
. .4.n
.
.1 - °.F TL 11A. .l. i .3�..:
Y• ,..
'
11 ` ..
f �r • Y at
1 Yl '
P %
e
.' ..
•
A. r - .-
A.
- l�. : t
-
- - - ,. .. _ ..
r.
..
s.
A
S.E' r
.. .
.. ` .Qld t' /t 4.
'p
Y �, .J'
.111. . . • 4 - .. r.
-
3 �.

May 18, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles G e
FROM: Jim Simons /Qp
SUBJECT: Castle Hayn Quarry
I, contacted Charles Hollis, Corp o£.Enginears, Regulatory Department (763-9971
ext. 564) concerning mining in the cypress wetlands adjacent to Martin Marietta's
Castle Hayne Quarry. Hollis reported that Martin Marietta had. violated "404"
several years ago by building a dike along the N.E. Cape Fear River and had vio-
lated an 1890's law when the quarry opened by diking off a part of the river and a
stream adjacent tothe operation. The Corp has notified Martin Marietta that any
future work in the swamp areas will require a permit since the land is wetlands and
tidal swamp and has recently toured the site with representatives of Martin Marietta.
The exact limit of the Corps' jurisiJetion has not been determined. Martin Marietta
has submitted an inadequate 914D4° application to the Corp which was returned for
correction. The revised application has not been submitted. Martin Marietta had
planned to mine in the wetlands in 1978 but Hollis advised Martin Marietta to postpone
wetlands mining since other high ground could be mined and opposition to wetlands
mining was anticipated. Horace Wilson is coordinating Martin Marietta "4D4" appli-
cation.
I also called John Parker, DNER Marine Fisherdes, concerning the matter. Martin
Marietta has a "borderline" violation of the State's dredge & fill laws by diking
along the river. An inadequate application was submitted and returned to Martin c
Marietta. A new application is expected within a few days. Opposition to the
application is anticipated. Dave Adams office has been in touch with John Parker
concerning this matter.
ds

t i
I
`F {
1.-
May 18j'1977' .i
Y
t
$e•Na'YM
TOt Charles GardneR .r..
^.FPCHS ,.._ Jixa Simons - -
:-. �SCBJSCT:Castle Hayne Quarry . .. '. .
9
n contacted Charles -Hollis, Corp of Engineers, Regulatory D'epartment'(763-9(m
-ext. 564) concerning. mining. in the cypress wetlands adjacent to Martin Marietta's
...Castle Hayae Quarry. Hollis reported that Martin Marietta:had violated•"404"- ,
several years. -ago by'building a dike along`the'N.E.. Cape -Fear River and had via.
laced sn.18901a law. when the quarry opened :by diking off -at part. of the river end a
stream adjacent to the op"oration.. The Corp has ratified Ma•tin;Maristta that any ,
future work in the'swamp areas.will require a permit since the lend is wetlands and '
tidal swamp•and-has recently toured the site with representatives. of Martin Marietta.
The exact: limit.of'the Corps!'jurisidotion has'not been determined. Martin Marietta..
-h'as submitted an inadequate 11404" application to the Corp which"was returned for
• correction., The revised applicatUn has nat'Veem submitted..Martln Marietta had
planned to mine in the wetlands in 1978 but.kollis advised Martin Marietta to postpone
wetlands mfnfitg since' other high ground could be mined and opposition to -wetlands
- mining was anticipated. :H6reoe Wilson is. coordinating Martin' Marietta "404" appli—
caticn.
' I alio:,called'John Parker, DNER Marina Fisheries, emeeriiing the matter..' Martin.• • '
Marietta has a 'borderline" vimlation°of the State's dredge-E. fill laws by diking
along the rives. An'inadequate:application -was.'submitted and returned to Martin -
Marietta. -A. new application is expected within a few days. ,Opposition to'the ,
• application is'anticipated.." Dave Adams office has been'in'touch :with John Parker. '.
concerning this matter. .
de

+'
r N t I:. .. ,• a• r n t
./ F •
vj
•.
i ,
In V
�'GCIIir kunr?4r%' re4 }`6l•p4r
' urS t' a'1Sv s.•rr f ;`y+fa rF d1 cy�rae r . past x r+Irgr; 47 lc,nr ie fci .,
:l,a lit
..p..J. 7^aca¢.,T,*rv,.aoz a, •6r �F?!,A?aiiy! a. v. 'twbo*ad:iM1�'n:.,tyr4+.
7 »rt{rsEba.r ,�asl, y.r, .ry2"y_Fo•b.,F�c '?•Tc.^� +.a i.R,�m7F 4L�'.:raFlu.r',
-:TF'j T Al, Jill grtic`-m -
.r .d'.�Ti Y4;,nair r�vr ru ."h. <,.^Fo frUVn,rca' o,c-:av�•;`'s�}ry w lY-v. r•r;To
vnr
Vhriro-3Rpu-
.4t+d1'P a§ a u�.f.?-qu tli�'Cr ors• z.:Siv:t-'e±&rA "�;ei, !.-. �" ttt�]fw �3U7,,-
R'+'`Er.iiFmg'rwi'7-rr n3 ane-r:cpmu;Fo•raa�Jxitnz .
...j-xuuc�.enJuTile .nofiJ•Faige- 11 J'•18 i5%fi-1aj7 c::a3'�i •:!'rt x'a 7eF';'n. EOe+"Dove
co3.Y,a ATW b x.q.^.;E;Gq i;:fa54T4'�i }re2 ya. N,95.. eupvtir. Fss ,''f: -�fij r¢''•:T .'+ ;.Ta
! ❑ e*gfun4':£ a <rlev c ;LJ C?gyy' r Co c:'$ CCLn t.F aye -s�5' zs4n;,vcg rv,.
•e grg.>r:r.}trd �.tu..pemf rkar. if'.w1. 3^. tryF,.;elrr k.•ra2.5'n0..
ay e�wmaii s'ua, na $eof.r, "+� s3a � t^He_2?fie {+rrr.� a.^•�,ca'c-1?s.en7 or A-ax•F4v �L-eq.}w• , '.
97
rT fR:n.:=,jlc TJ Cy{.. .^F,v V.t Sf;G9)r'a`T27 S:E i;.43.N. rr*cuj4'. •sv'7.?{ gfo puk, aif 1';Hyg�ur:o gilq,
f• �,. ?tia�9'_.rF Cw+N:ir obez�fi:i;ud'�oxn pis; t r•Ti7e"_ .n%•F9'a-`iT's`fe8:ra}>&-
V:0W 9a•:J•�,N•r,s 7ii.�'.c ri;;r-Vile Wrsi xt'R v*,cutq.�.� u pys gt�• s
,p2J,7f7oau4 e'74�Nd_SF:dug�F. "Ia, _ �.± G 9'+, .vax�rn surf rµ;F t•TO
BEaWT4 :rtiwc 5 d7x1v° N67j ;��zeM1or•gy FPa,^• w,(,3,.r .tax,. ru.r`o;.l�j ".::.i'0 _ *• -..
..rye•• afitl :cCGCq,'.11q'rl$-111'RJt�i(. P.. !.`7.3 'CjS'�LBdf :-a!`it%i.!93 F)c r c..L,}', `}'6. y�s!•'.,�'Rr. >431.TUy!'plg
•.1ca:rf'icwsry r!!er•pca•va7Tra� t.�>Waox ;siTltt�s.a,'x•t;a�rQc.q<>-.•:A,�aTrM.,, ::uF :(
r
vir
ALI ulr a78d' ccLefJ4at _ i � - r - -
•
41
,
\ - rA•.t
r 1. 4 .i �� 4✓
S
,,r } sa rti' Tds
:x
s-
- sa

, I I
•ij lit (DIVISION Of
North Carolina Department of Natural LAN6I RESOLRCES
Resources &Communit SwV am G.I troA, Di oOnro
y Development ae ,; I
07. a
James B. Hum. Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary imLdnoa amhxaaav
I. Ili i •' �,�'• i r 1 i I I ',
May 5, 1980
j Il i
Mr. Horace Wilson , ,
Ml11 in Marietta 4 "
I. 10. 0013
I11 Neigh. I�rth Carolina 27612 .,
g8: New 'Hein Quarry, Craven County ' 'e !' -! 'I . '•
Bigtadei Quarry, Onslow County•' ''I,' 'I'I •'I"!I
tlIl�eI •Rayne Quarry, New Hanover County 1 •',.
I' Ill I , , I . . y r I, I •1.',
Dear Mr, Wilson:
Thanklyou for your assistance in inspecting the New,Bern and Belgrade
Quarries on April 30 1980. inI
"I I
Both operations were generally in compliance -with The'Mining Act of 1971.
Due to the nature of the mining operations and since the',proposed reclamation _
plan is generally,to convert the, quarrylexcavation,into lakes, reclamation 'I
activities; are somewhat limited.,.
I �lHoyevar, .at the New,Bern Quarry, spoil from the recent divereLou ditch ,
I should be graded and revegetated. Other completed areas',lying above lthe I I
roundwater'table should, also be. graded land revegetated.'I' I I .1
('' "-I
II• ,I, FuCUT�errquarry explanaion plane andposeible divereionof }he WkiteOak
Ali liver at the Belgrade Quarry will require ,permit modifice,tion. We; v1111 be 4
happy to review your future plane when, appropriate.'y I, rFl
I� •We arel•still concerned about the r clamation and groundwater effects 'at
the Castie'lHayne Quarry. I hope,to contact you soon to arrange a meeting on
I,., .'r l' I 'r '1 ,• I I I I I �.
Gaolapc4 Su secaom�33Q423: Geodotk$urvnv 5octian—)333B3eaaM Gu Ihy Sedlon-7]3A614:1PIonninaand lmanlort 5atlon-733 M33;
I` Land enoWca, Inl4rmaTICI, Soaa"-733.2llgp.,-
. An equal OGCorruntly Ahirmmivt Anion lmAkryn • d •
' I.

, I
I
Mr. Horace Wilson
May 5, 1980
Page 2
, I
Per your earlier request, I have contacted the Attorney General's
office concerning the jurisdiction of The,Mining Act of 1971 to ground-
water matters. The Attorney General's office agreed that the regulations
of the effect of the mining operation on the quantity of,groundwaterl
available to adjoining landowners would be an appropriate exercise of
the Department's right to impose conditions on the operator so as to,
minimize the operations effects.on the surrounding environment. In
making this opinion, G.S. 74-51, 47, and 48 were cited.
I will be happy to discuss this with,you further. I
Sincerely,
James. D . Simons `
l Mining Specialist
JDS:pg I
cc: Floyd Williams
Gerald Kraynak
I
I
I , I
i
k ,
i
, I
I � I
I
I � I
1
{
i
I

February 11, 1981
MEMORANDUIII
TO: File
FFM dim Simons
SUBJECT: Castle Ha e Quarry Expansion
I calked Dave Bingham, D.O.T. concerning protection of SR 1002 during
proposed quarry expansion.
Bingham agreed that a 200 foot buffer from the edge of the right-of-
way to the initial pit disturbance should be adequate. This buffer would
provide for an approximately 110 foot wide buffer after grading the 30
foot depth of overburden to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical grade. Berms
would be required as necessary for visual screening.
JDS: pg

FLOODED PIT
PLANT
FLOODED PIT
MINED OUT PIT ✓✓//
a
C OU NtY RD. Y1002
)I
► 5-80
-80 �►
DO
N
W E
S
OBSERVATION WELLS
NEW WELL-MMA
OLD WELL-MMA
A U.S.G.S. WELL
STATE WELL-2
ACCESS ROAD
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
P.O. BOX 30013
RALEIGH, N. C. 27612
PROPERTY MAP
. CASTLE HAYNE QUARRY
NEW HANOVER CO., N. C.

cl

North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
i
°.dames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
January 23, 1978
Mr. Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P. 0, Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Re: Castle Hayne Quarry
Dear Mr, Willson
This letter will acklowledge receipt of a new site plan of the
Castle Hayne Quarry showing the outline of the proposed future pit
excavation.
I understand that the same reclamation plan as the older exca-
vation will apply. Therefore, the mining permit No. 65-1 is amended
to include this area.
You understand of course that this permit does not supersede any
other applicable permits from the Corps of Fngineers, N. C. Marine
Fisheries, or Environmental Management, and appropriate permits mist
be obtained from these agencies if necessary.
Please advise if we can be of further assistartce.
cc: Mr. Gerald Yraynak
Sincerely,
James D. Simons
Mining Specialist
max 27637 Raleigh, North C+rwhu 27611
9pyorlovhy Ar/lrnrvrA'o Arrion Cmnlayn

r,
S[/PER/OR STONE COMPANY
P, O. BOX 2479 TELEPHONE [phone] RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
JOHN W, GRAHAM
VICE PRESIDENT PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT
Mr. J. Craig McKenzie
State Mining Engineer
Division of Natural and
Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
A DIVISION OF
MA M771V
M.ARIETTA
May 16, 1972
We would like to make the following amendments to our applications
for a mining permit:
Page 2, question C.3.
Blasting will be conducted so as to prevent damage by thrown
rocks and from excessive vibration. Any natural feature,
such as hedgerow of trees or ridges, will be left undisturbed.
Where necessary rows of trees will be established between
excavation and neighboring property or vegetated earth berm
will be established. Reasonable safeguards, such as guard
rails, fences, and oversize rocks will be located as close to
dangerous openings as possible.
Page 3, question C.4.(1).
Substantial deposits of sediment in stream beds and lakes will
be prevented by establishing a stable slope angle in unconsoli-
dated material. Waste water from plant and storm runoff carry-
ing silt from spoils piles and active mining area will be
directed by drainage ditches or terraces to settling ponds
before discharging downstream. Revegetation will begin on
ditch banks and on spoils piles no longer in use as soon as
feasible after construction.
Page 3, question C.4.(2).
Measures taken to prevent landslides would include stripping
loose, unconsolidated material from the top of pit or quarry
wall for a safe distance, but in no case less than 10 feet;
this unconsolidated material will be sloped to the angle of
repose and revegetated if necessary to prevent erosion.
Mining methods shall be selected which will ensure wall and
bank stability, including benching as necessary to obtain a
safe overall slope.

Mr. J. Craig.McKenzie
May 16, 1972
Page 2'
Amendments to Reclamation Plan
Page 2, question 3.
This operation does not yield any toxic pollutants that would
be hazardous to animal or fish life. Water in ponds that
remain on the property will be accessible to and suitable for
wildlife use. Ramps and access roads into pit will be left.
Permanent ditches will be constructed with sloping banks
stabilized with vegetation to offer access and to prevent
siltation.
Page 2, question 4.
Reasonable safeguards, such as guard rails, fences, and berms,
will be provided as close to dangerous openings as possible.
The face of overburden material will be set back at least
10 feet from quarry wall and sloped to the angle of repose.
Mining methods will be selected which will ensure wall and
bank stability, including benching as necessary to obtain a
safe overall slope. Whenever possible, natural wooded areas
adjacent to pit will remain undisturbed, or species of trees
native to the area will be planted.
Page 3, question 8.
Permanent diversion ditches and stream channels will be
established to a gradient, width, and depth as near as
possible like that existing prior to mining. Banks will be
sloped to the angle of repose and stabilized with vegetation
and/or rip -rap to minimize erosion.
Page 3, question 10.
The surface gradient will be established wherein no slope will
be greater than 34 degrees, keeping in mind that accessibility
to as much of the area as possible would be desirable. The
method of achieving these gradients will be by grading and/or
backfilling.
Sincerely your ;
John W. Graham
JWG/ j c r

w
3
11
t -
1

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST DIVISION
P. O. BOX 30013
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27012
TELEPHONE [phone]M
November 12, 1980
Mr. James D. Simons
Mining Specialist
Natural Resources and
Community Development
Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Jim.
On 11/4/80 I met with Jerry Kraynak at Castle Hayne to look at
the reclamation that is in progress at this site. Jerry was
satisfied with what we have done and should have sent a letter
concerning this on to you.
At this time we would like to amend our mining permit at Castle
Hayne to include the area between the railroad and county road
#1002. Due to the Highway Department`s involvement at the Reasor
site, Martin Marietta would like to have the option of mining
this other area prior to the full development of the Reasor site.
I have included a map showing the affected area. If you have
questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Carole Cameron
CC/e
Enclosure

MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES
I'I
on 1:°J
lA1dD. QUALITY SECTION.
sou7HEMa owmloN
R.O.WX 300I3
RA IOH. NORTNWROLINA 27012
7ELERHONEm131751-e 50
Mr. James D. 'Simons
Mining Specialist
Division of Land Resources
N. C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Simons:
September 9, 1980
The attached information is relative to the observation wells
at Castle Rayne.
As per your request, I an sending you a copy of the well data
recently submitted to Mr. Rick Shiver. Mr. Shiver plans to
provide monitors for wells N3-80 and $4-80. We will conduct
manual checks on the remaining wells at weekly intervals.
Our Carole Cameron will be visiting Castle Rayne shortly and
will provide you with a reclamation proposal for the existing
pit. Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Horace S. Willson
Senior Environmental Engineer
HSW/oe
Attachment
cc: R. W. Edwards

i r
.DIVISION OF .
p ENVIRONIUNTAL ' MANAGEMENT '
. Oc ! 301 1974
Mr. Stenly, G. lant - -I P.
Regional Environmental Cancel lls eger
Diamond Shamrock Chemical 1 an7
1100 Superior Avenue•
Cleveland, Ohio 44115. -+
.. CT: Amendment to Permit No. 1912
Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. 1ant: '. .+, -
Reference is made to the ptember ,5; 1973, letter'ts you fr.= this .Office;
amending eu6ject,permit'to alio\ the diepbaal"o£'sludge-from the Company's as-.
dustiial treatment. eyetem into'4e abandoned Martin Marietta :quarry ad3acent to
.the. Diamond Shamrock site. Thisamendment was a 'result of the Company' a ,request, of f
May,'1973, and contained one conitien,�among others, requiring'thet the sludge be
free of leachable chlorides and placed, in the quarry as a solid waste.. ...,
Thu Company has indicated thsugh reports and confareacee eince'the September
5, 1973, amendment that it will no be possible to render, the sludge free of, leech-.t.
able chlorides. It has also been �dicated that the installation of sludge Trash-
ing and, dewatering. equipment necesary to, remove chlorides from thesludge will not
be initiated until the second quait�. of 1975 with completion dependent on material
delivery schedules - '
During an August 15, 1974,. meet' in the -Southeastern Field Office in Wilmington
between officials of the Company and This Division, the Company requested'.thatthe
condition requiring the sludge be Tres of leachablechlorides be removed from the ,
,September 5 amendment in order to allow the Company to continue operations while the. ,
sludge washing and dewatering facility is being designed and constructed. Toprevent
increased pollution of the groundwater aquifers, the,Compauy agreed to the following
conditions: ..
5.1. Install a groundwater monitoring natwoik as described-
' „ .' '• by, the, Groundwater Section on and, around the Company
site'}t•:Refeienee is made to the Sep-ember.27, 19740
1._.•'"..:lettesto Mr, 'Chet.Rudolf,-Plant Manager, from Mr.
•Richard Shiver; 99drologist, describing such a moni-
1
i

7 .. r•r-ere l rK y.L�A i 'taye < x' l rr,;. r -Aar
, a i ' ;,ry is T�1.. ua l „tu r'•' yml r Tr
ee,c..`,
.Z'L1J { •Lb
i ,newt •n S:d)'�rli•s }n t'.` -):c rcmw.;Uxtz $. ..fz.:• t r rn+•s. '•:z�.,aj CG Re bj p.. -
..1-llf rJ }iTU�lCn T! Oilf� fiS Jil t7. 511i W .xtff!'PGc yJ lr.wl i
G .LSTIfrr � Gj9( .'Yb BbL fI r+,wi rtt 'Jl'J r1 A CUEF-u v OLbC:aTOf '.dj.IG {Ib
c4lraa rtp L rnx TJr ".Irc a,(m) r� .p'. cL I rl ;n1 c}Tv 't?r
E'.^I•! I,xf,+T "'0171 T f 'C.' P J5.•: i;w
T 1. 14a� .i Oat „Jfi;;3q �..J}7 SAC V. . T Ar�.tLY{o}t
'j.rT I t" 'n;, rA tJ• rrr'u ri rr.lu •x G J 1i. I'Tt 1c W7 r.acraT ..
Z'•I �U I _T zrrL Y'GtlR.fdL�Ti ]r rU r: o - -#: 7cL1 r 1 f.. U)is 4
U7u'T� J i-L i;4R Arr'•t:'';LE' rr A••.Gy.
J:_) 1A� U :.S':1 x.. JjLG U)
rrc v.. l' r' T� rrTt,rr rcr. " r.). ,.'v,7�c .�r'C,(:c dT ir1 -: 1 r TTrt f.C:Y.:•
u 1c
:C. IIio p 11f.T 1 C$ I'ti i J"..; f,U1 J%, ✓ L r: Rf ler l'.�- x f'(. u -
J.
- .
t._'Lu 31 .ut J 1R rj 4f0 A . t.0 J I r rni T.1 " .
C .ti 1,Cu..YI r4• a) .�.C_: ;cGL.r. $IAJ.f ! •6,L Vo -2Jt
/�•V v.Lrj. LUE:: 4dl(c1.j .;Pr'Fl,:
• l.:'i'Ai£9 '.:_ns:y: b:ut rn ),ry ;C'. 0'
f S.r4 0
TQr 4A 1711
yxart7r diet (7C9jc:'T .J { - -
J,ta.a r rnaorafcrtAar ;P T JI ""'c'x,
Id I
, r
i`
cL ti ,

A&. Stanly %ant
Page TWOSG
October 30, 1974 '
poring system. A monitoring schedule must be approved
by the Groundwater Section and continued for the period
of time' deemed necessary. A ;copy of the September 27,
1974, letter is 'attached fox. y617 ur. reference. .
22. Remove and control chloride -pollution ii- the aquifers ; ' •'
to the extent necessary'to maintain the groundwatera.•,
at a quality suitable for drinking, industrial .or any , r ; • ' . ' r . ' '
other usage requirini rater of -;lower quality.. Methods,.,.
of '" depollutiig" the aquifers ' may - include pumping in-
stn `latioas, and/0 ..'removal of the deposited sludge .for =
'' ' A 3 ali&ina:te' disposal.
tine" the-existi.ng sludge lagoon with a type of liner
t
' approve .b the Groundwater Section Immediately after '
removing the sludge'and prior to placing ttie lagoon
back into operation.'
7 4. Submit annEngineering Wport' on the -proposed sludge ; , , . • '
Y;f''`' �•'.' washing anil dewatering system'on.or before December ,
5.' ,Initiate' construction of they sludge washing;.and, de -
watering' system during.'the` second' quarter of 1975. "A'`
q Pe*mit €!r 'thl.s • pvuj ?.ct. must'be•, obtained prior. to' '}
enCer'ing; construction contracts.' (A, ppi6ximatelp f,dun t
months' Should'be allovted••for `6i,s process) `, Construction
shall proceed as rapi.dly.as possible, -although a.'com-, '
`pletion'date is not`Projected at this•time since
• mater'ial-delivery schedules' are unkaowa. A completion
date:acceptable' to this Division "will be- ineluded-'in 'the
Compaaq's permit aPPli, tions:. • , ,
6. The 'Company keep in 'force or agreement with the owners
of the i uarry which a1lotip the solid waste disposal.' '
' ;,Blased 'upon :the above' conditions; Permit 'No:' 1912' is` hereby �aniinded, to al IT.
I,• 1141
.the' disposal of chloride�-contaminated sludge .into the' abandoned MartinMarietta
quarry, until the ,installation of tie' propoSid(rsliidge -washing 'syste'mi is completed: ,
".'A] 1, other terms .and conditions contained '•m part of the' otiginal' petiAt remain in '
fu11, force) and effect. ' „ s

.
rl
'
tiff Y O • _ yI
. } .:1
L. J' 7 2: ty F \ � J f � T.'� -'s T.N• 1�-..•IFJ '
L � �E.,
f d .ty-•
-
4 4
. , � Gr nt,� : ai;: F:� ,YI.F,, t. 2 : il'T, "'a "a •: n,w i•
,
1 -
..
tr— c..agr .:.a r_e M^, Irr,.-..,:•.r.;:ul+r:: cY:s','yw•.
-
.. 1 , Ic
n• 4 iJi LS,_".��
. .`:aK,:7u. _:_�c� ::.n7 :•: r,:r'• :::.ewH -' "cee' =a Ti2F
1 i t•. _t
:'Lk' Cl rtv• •0'�
.
' � P- 'Y rs'(F. 1.:R: �rYW.�!: ''f.YS 0? �:1�`r.yE •I ". '
. _
,
rf
s,1.3
.
�•• -`.r •: PI'- ;"O:� :-I .. �;. ,r6h_>c- .e-fxi •=A+r ':y .fF:Y.o
.. ..
.r
.u_•';Va.!
-. .. .t .1 ♦irci^::?11.'r.§:i C3Sj?'t.A+• .. Ji ': in.^'ri''y :+:'CL�'7 .,•:i:
...
go ExYn! yja
..f 3L'� r .39J� ., ft :n'i733L MI 11.: •:1b
w
. U • 'L T:CL�-''-.ffl i• \ CUL3 Vi CEL1ft•,.. ��'
y' I e!'G
.
" ;'.'e�^a „x:ev;...H:n: ^rrcrnu slm cau &p,en�"_ grs`�G}Ir. M'isn7.
•.
_. Gonr Y: :hzt'r,.r�., .r r,wlq cnr.; •K: Au�CnJJrq Lsi$ tr'?SbtuiiC,{

�. Stanly Lant
Page Three
• October 30,, IR74
If,you have any questione,�pleaee do not hes'itate-to' contact -me,
;'. Sincerely, yours, .
�E. u bard . L
cc: L. P. Bentdn; ji.: ,' ,
IN
Barry •Peek ,
Rick Shiver
p0faig McKenzie.h f
SEFO
Technical Services

Tf
`
��QrT.
SG r,%Ae`'dG^•.'»ra'f•'na.t'
:.jG:•�C, rG S.yY IrARii bu f.0 6vui' V L'G•
.. 4
_
.. 1. .. `

'STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
a®c
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES '.
Box 27667 Raleigh 27611
IAMCS E. MA RR,N4iON JAMES E.HOLSSER, l0.
GoVERNM
SECRETARY
TEEEP E
A.E. COVE www-n,. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
3143 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28401
October 30, 1974
MEMORANDUM TO: L. F. Benton, Supervisor ,
Field Services
FROM: Tyndall Lewis, Acting
Regional Engineer
Southeastern Field Office
SUBJECT: Amendment of permit
Diamond Shamrock Company
New Hanover County
Reference is made to the attached September 5, 1973, letter from Mr. Hubbard
to subject Company amending Permit No. '1912 to allow the disposal of sludge from
the Company's industrial treatment system into an adjacent Martin Marietta stone
quarry. Conditions of the amendment included that the sludge be free of leachable
chlorides, that information be submitted pertaining to leachate chloride concentra-
tions, and that the Company keep in force agreement with the owners of the quarry
which allows the solid waste disposal. .
The September 5, 1973, letter further suggests that:
(1) The Company conduct evaluations to determine the level of
leachable chlorides in the solid waste in the South pond.
(2) The Company determine the mound of rainwater necessary to
leech the waste from either pond.
(3) The Company determine the permeability of the bottoms and
sides of the lagoons.
(4) The Company waterproof the sides and bottoms of the lagoons
(5) Remove existing chlorides from the aquifer to return the
aquifer to a useable status.
(6) provide adequate water quality monitoring.

DEMO TO: L. P. Benton
Page Two
October 30, 1974
(7) Washing and dewatering facilities for the sludge be
considered...
An engineering report dated December 20, 1973; prepared by Law Engineering, was
submitted as a result of the September 5, letter. To summarize the report,'it
is noted that:
(a) The requirement that the sludge be chloride free could
not be met by inplace'seepage.
(b) Total available lagoon space is 120 acre feet. Chloride
concentrations of sludge -samples ranged from 12,000 ppm
to over 100,000 ppm. It would take about 3-6 years for
one cubic foot of sludge to be flushed of chlorides, if
the pressure head was equivalent to 1 foot of water.
(c) The was 9e sludge has a vertical permeability of about
1 x 10~ cm/sec.
(d) The laboratory gate of flushing by seepage through un-
disturbed samples is influenced (lengthened) by slow
solution of crystalline chloride compounds in the sludge
.pores.
This information serves as the basis for answers to items 1 and 3 above.
By letter dated March 13, 1974, the Company submitted copies of a preliminary
report for a sludge washing and dewatering system prepared by Dorr Oliver. Approval
of the concept -was requested in order that final engineering contracts could be
awarded for the final design of the system.
By letter dated May 23, 1974, the Company indicates that the disposal of sludge
contained in the South lagoon would not provide sufficient time for the installation
of the above mentioned sludge washing system.
A meeting was held in the Southeastern Field Office on August 15, 1974, and
attended by the writer, Rick Shiver, hydrologist, Stan Taylor, Environmental
Engineer, .Grey Seymour, Engineering Technician, Barry Peek, Chief;. Groundwater
Chief, Frank Guenzel, C. D. Rudolf, and Stan Lant, representative of Diamond Sham-
rock Company. At this meeting the Company again requested that it be allowed to
dispose of the chloride contaminated sludge in Martin Marietta's quarry, and agreed
to the following stipulations:
1. The Company would install a monitoring system to be described
or approved by the Groundwater Section.
2. The Company would "depollute" the aquifers by pumping install-
ations and/or removal of the sludge deposits to the extent
necessary to maintain the groundwaters at a quality suitable

YXMO TO: L. P. Benton
Page Three
October 30, 1974 ,
for drinking,.industrial or other usages requiring water
of lower quality.
3. Line the existing lagoon with a material approved by the
Groundwater Section after the sludge is removed and prior
to placing the lagoon back into operation.
4. Submit an Engineering Report on the sludge washing and de -
watering system on or before December 31, 1974.
5. Initiate construction of the system during second quarter
of 1975 with completion contingent upon equipment delivery
schedules.
The Company also indicated at this meeting that it would take approximately
200 years for rainwater to leach the chlorides from the existing sludge deposits.
The information and stipulations agreed upon at the meeting appear to answer the
remaining points of the September 5 letter.
Rick Shiver, by letter dated September 27, 1974, describes the required moni-
toring system to be implemented by the Company. By memo to the writer dated
September 24, 1974, Mr. Shiver further suggests additional requirements to be placed
on the Company as conditions of approval for disposal of the chloride -rich sludge.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that Permit Number 1912 be amended to allow the Company to
dispose of chloride contaminated sludge into Martin Marietta's adjacent quarry
based on the stipulations agreed upon at the August 15, 1974, meeting and requirements
described,in Mr. Shiver's September 27 letter and September-24 memorandum.- A
letter has been prepared for Mr. Hubbard's signature for this purpose.

FP
ater ZY/3 e
ozcg OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
017
September 5, 1973
Mr, Stanly G. Lant
Diamcmd Shamrock Chemicel Company �1 �� (�C 2 G'PA
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
"TUBJgCT: Anendvent to Per�iit too. 1912
Df amond Shamrock Chemical Company
Frew Hanaver County, North Carolina -
Dear'Mr_'. Lant:
On October 16, 1970, PerrAt No. "1912 was ,i zsued 'to DiamonA Shamrock Chemical
Company for the co4iitruction aszd operation of lnduatri.al 'wastevater tkeatment
facilities designed'to process• wastewater resulting from the production of. Chrome
Chemicals. The original rermit .included sludge lagoons for final disposal•af the`'.:•
sludges.'resulting from=the-1treatmeiit of wastewater from the Chrome Chemical F1:ant:
The Company constructed _tree 6' acre siuclge 41oposal -lagoons during the ari$inal" c6n'
otruction phase. Ana result of objections expressed by members of the United Statci�
Department of Interior, Bureau'.of Sports Fisheries, and the'North�Carolina Vildlifa:
Resources Commission, the Company -was prohibited from 'constructing additional siud je ,
disposal lagoons in tha awamplando originally acquired for that purpose. It:ig,'
therefore, necessary for the Company 'to devise an accep'tabie'mnana of disposing of
those.sludges by some alternate method.
In May of 1973, Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company aubmitted'to thin Oifice.a
pioposal.�to dispose of treated indudtrial waste, including the sludges, into a worked
out stone quarry adjacent to the Company property. An alternate proposal was also
included for i isposing of the slug ge only in the vorkced out quarry. ` This proposal
xraa reviewed by.the Groundwater Division, tho Water Quality Division, and repre-
sentativcn of the U.S.G.S. There was a cmeensus wnang the parties reviecri.ng the
proposal that further information, was necessary prior to hither concurrence in or
rejection of the proposal.
on June 26, 1973,'a'canfrerence was held at the Diamond Shamrock Chemical
Company, Chrome Chemical Plant, New itanover County. In attendance at the core
fCerence was Ralph.Haath, U.S.G.S.; Marry Peek, Chief, Groundwater Division; and
L. P. Benton, Jr., Supervisor,, Field Services, Water Quality Division. During the
course of the conference and in correspondence Qince that time, it has been
established that neither the Groundc:ater Division nor the Water Quality Division
could concur in the placement of the treated industrial waste directly into the ,
quarry pits or into unlined ponds. It was further determined that neither Division.
could concur in the placement of the decratered solid wasto into the quarry pits until
residual chloride had been flushed from the caste. As a result of these two findings
it was suggeeted that: r,

Mr. Stanly G. Lant
Page Two
September 5, 1973
(1) The Company should conduct evaluations to detcrmina the'
Leval of leachable chlorides still remaining in the _`solid-':':
waste in -the south pond. • =
(2) The Company'should determine the quantity of rain water
-necessary to leach the waste from either pond uhan discharges
to the pond. ceased. ,
(3) The Company would determine ttie permeability of the bottoms
and sides of tho present disposal ponds,.. -
The
Company was also advised that it would be'ne'cessary 'to do-the.followilig
things t ,,.. r... .
(1 exproof the bottoms and sides of the" xisiing ponds- _
to prevent leakage of.wastewater info the ground craters
if' permeability determiratlons indicate that tho ponds"
` are not already sealed:
(2) . Femova exiatinig chlorides from the aquifer to' return the "
aquifer to i usable estate,
(3) Provide adequate water quality. -monitoring in the aquif or • :. , '
to determine the level ok-piotaetio- afte=•the'wastemmter.'
treatment process and sludge disposal have'U en initiated.
Alteraatea to the_ above i+Pra a_ s-o discucsed, These included washing and.dewatering
facilities fox the sludge -and disposal of the sludge as*a dry solid. `
Since the in tiatian of ttiessuggrsted methods' of, sludge disposal_ ' or_ the alternatives- .
is not In conformity with Permit 'go: 1512,,Permit No: 1912 is heroby amiended to -
allow the` dispoal ` so:f sludge ,into t 'ea 'haadoned stone quarry adjacent to plan_ t property. '
The sludge must be free of leachnbl.e chlorides and must be placed on�_szlld waste.-
PrLor to begiaain this operation, the Company moat submit laboratory data_Co this —
Office which reflects the ct�rido concentration of leachate Prom the solid waste.
Further, the Company must Seep in force an agreement with the owners of the quarry
iriiich nll the salt waste disspoaa . ' `.�:.
it is suggested that the Company proceed as rapidly'as possiblo to develop .a
method which will result in the abandonment of the present ponds at an early date'or
converting the present ponds as indicated herein. Preliminary plans for the method
selected should be submitted to this Office at an early date. "•
r, _ i

r-
t•W.,.Stanly G. Lant
Page Three
Sept=ber S. 1973
All other terms and conditions in Permit No. 1912 .xcwaia in •fu114force and -effect.
Consideration will be given to extension of Permit No. 1912, at least 30 days -
prior to Decembar 31, 1973. If I can bo of further assietanCn,'do..'not hasistate to
contact Me*' -
Sincarely,
B. CC.ubbard
- r As
eistant Director
cc: Ground Water
Eastern RegisiQ�ice� `
Rniph • pica th
LrB// Snyk.Aenton, Jr.
•
i

STA_ TE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
Rex 27667
Raleigh 27611
AYES L NA4,INCTON
JAMES E. N0lSNOV114.I
GOVERNOR
.... T`,`; .`.'.:.,..
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MAXACEMF.N7
GROUNDWATER SECTION
L -.
.." •''"r
'= . 3143. Wrightsville Avenue
"
September
27, 1974
Wilmington, NC 28401
Mr. Chet Rudolf
Plant Manager -
Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company "
Castle Hayne, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Rudolf: '
The Monitoring System designed to enhance understanding of the hydrogeologic
system on and around Diamond Shamrock property is as follows:
1. Continue to monitor existing system (wells 1-12) for
water level and chemical quality.
2. Make arrangements to monitor water level and chemical
quality from potable wells 1, 2, and 3 on IS plant site.
A measuring point elevation must be determined.
3. Make arrangements to monitor existing observation well
for water levelJwater quality recently installed by
Sydnor Hydrodynamics. A measuring point elevation
must be determined.
4. Make arrangements to monitor existing observation
wells for WL/WQ (water levelJwater quality) on Martin
Marietta property. Measuring point elevations have
been determined already..."
5. Make arrangements to monitor active potable wells for
WL/WQ on Ideal Cement property. This may mean installing
access ports and sampling outlets. Measuring point
elevations must be determined. .
6. Investigate "the 'possibility of using potable wells
(five) abandoned by Ideal Cement for WL/WQ monitoring

i
�. Mr. Chet Rudolf
Page Two
September 27, 1974
In addition to using existing wells to obtain WL/WQ data, the installation of five
additional well stations is considered necessary. Consult enclosure for general •
locality of stations. It is''recognized that some variance of the proposed locations
may be necessary.?';',+,.`;;-c{-";;•; ,. - _
The particulars of the new well system should be as follows:
Ia. Install Well Station •A first.*' Two •wells will make,'•' .. -
up well Station A. The first well shall be screened
opposed the Castle Hayne Limestone; the second well -
shall be screened opposite the Pee Dee Sandstone/Sand. '
Water levels from each well shall be obtained.;,
2b. If the water levels are the same then hydraulic;'';*:;+.
connection of two aquifers is suggested: `c•' T•''�T q ggested:' consequently,,,,:. *7•,.
the remaining Stations B, C, D, E, and P shall consist -... of. one well per station. F_ -
3c. If the water levels are significantly different then
the aquifers are not hydraulically connected and hence -
separate aquifers are indicated; in this event well
stations B. CO D, E, and P shall consist of two wells
per station.
4d. The eneral depth of the wells is anticipated to _
range from 15 to 75 feet. Based on the results of la,.'
the more exact total depths will be specified.:`.-
5e. The diameter of the wells shall be 2 inches; the -
casing shall consist of standard galvanized pipe 3.65.
pounds per foot; the wells shall be screened opposite
the aquifer in question; a sand filter shall be placed
opposite and slightly above the screen; heat grout .
- shall occupy the annular spaces from land surface to
_ •the top of the sand filler (a cement plug above filler may be necessary: The well casing must terminate above
land surface. Alternate construction methods are .
subject to discusslun.
6f. Measuring point elevations must be determined for each
well.ui
It is suggested that the drill contractor talk to me before installing Station'A -'
so that we are in complete aggrement with the construction method. .•
Based on the results of the data collected a sampling schedule will be specified.

M[.-Ghet P.udolf
Page Three
September 27, 1974
I hope this letter.better. outlines what we expect in the way of a monitoring
system in the vicinity _of Diamond Shamrock -
u
If I can help you further please call i 1�
-,r
Sincerely.- - g
R. S. Shiver -

a
F

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
R
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
Box 27687 Raleigh 27611
)AMB L eOISIIOOSER, IR-
I AMES E. HARRINGTON GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
AREA GORE vsNusueA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 24, 1974
MEMORANDUM TO: Tyndall Lewis, Acting Regional Engineer
Southeastern Regional Office
FROM: Rick Shiver, Hydrologist
SUBJECT: Diamond Shamrock Chrome Chemical Plant__
Permit Review
It is the recommendation of the Ground Water Section that the following
provisions be written into Water Quality Permit Number _fq 1.� to be issued
to Diamond Shamrock Chrome Chemical Plant, Castle Hayne, North Carolina:
1. That a ground water monitoring system approved by the Ground Water Section
be installed on and around Diamond Shamrock propoerty. The monitor-
ing system proposed consists of water level and water quality monitor-
ing. The monitoring schedule shall be approved by the Ground Water
Section.
2. That data derived from the monitoring system be the basis for further
action: Unfavorable data necessitates implementation of depolluting
measures. Depolluting measures include dewatering of aquifer (s) of
degrading substances.
3. That the lagoons be lined with an appropriate impermeable liner.
4. That engineering and installation of washing apparatus for separation
of chlorides from treated sludge proceed with dispatch.
It is further understood that failure to comply with these provisions
should result in revocation of this Permit.

State of North. Carolina
Department of Natural Resources & Community Development n�
Division of Land Resources ,/�y�(A-{
Land Quality Section, U,-
'
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I O N R E P O R T lb'�
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the permitted operation.
and within 30 days of completion or termination of mining on an area under permit, file with
the Department a mining reclamation report on a form prescribed by the Department."
Regulation No. 5E.0010 The Mining Act of 1971
.Name of Mine Castle Hayne Quarry Permit Number 65-1
County New Hanover Telephone [phone]
Name of Company Mo„t;„ Marietta Aggregates, Southeast Division
Mailing Address _ P.__0. Box 30013 Raleigh, N. C.. 27622
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 20 Acres
TOTAL 90 Acres '
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 20 acres
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control
The .waste material is placed in the old section of the pit.
5.5 acres of berms around the old pit were graded and seeded.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (a) Waste Piles 5.5 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine 0
Excavation Acres
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
5.5 acres of berms around the old pit were graded and seeded.
Signature of person responsible for
Title General Manaeer -
Date 2/11/80
Complete and return to:
Land Quality Section
Department of Natural Resources 6 Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

1MTSMON REI'I11Cr
Cim:pr:ny:�Ilf�%AP/Fi'1�J Couni.y:A-L.�C/srDl__._.._.
Permit Number�:.s
Date Inspected:- �% T//9 9/_ Date of last inspection..:jo�/ '"'2,Q T
Prod,;_t.: (����7ZS�L�"/li.4F�7U� Person Contauted:-Z7dz-
1. Remarks - Measures 'taken
A. Erosion Controi.:Tcvvc
E. Waste Disposal. �jeG2aifi.EOG.J ir
0ti12 zoo Gd
D. Reciamatioon�:,,�a(n,
.�r
II. Arivai Reports - Adequacy of plan
DCPUcLency letter needed
.1 a..
Letter Sent Reinspectio �„Needed_�.

Mr. Jay Powell
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Southeast Division
P.O. Box 398
Castle Hayne, N.C. 28429
Dear Mr. Powell.
On February 16, 1976,
Hanover County was made as
most of your conservation
adequate and in accordance
for a mining permit.
February 17, 1976
an inspection of your Castle Hayne Quarry in New
required by G.S. 74-56 of the Dining Act. I found
and reclamation practices carried out to date to be
with the provisions set forth in your application
One area of concern to me is with regard to the time schedule of your
reclamation plan'submitted with your application. Under Section 1 of your
reclamation plan you indicated that the depleted pit area adjacent to the
river would be developed into a lake with banks sloped and stabilized with
vegetation. And under Section 12 you indicated that reclamation plans will
be conducted simultaneously with the mining operation. G.S. 74-53 of the
Mining Act provides that reclamation activities should be initiated at the
earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining on any
segment of the permit area unless a longer period is specifically permitted
by the Department.
My recommendation is that the banks of the developing lake adjacent to
the river be sloped and stabilized with vegetation during the next planting
season outlined in your revegetation plan. It is my understanding that the
existing dike separating the proposed lake from the settling area is scheduled
to be raised to a higher elevation and also recommend that the slopes of the
dike be vegetated and stabilized upon completion of dike construction.
Upon completion of the recommendations listed above, your operation will
have reclaimed approximately 36 acres acceptable to the Department. This
would meet the basic objective of establishing on a continuing basis the
vegetative cover, soil stability, water conditions and safety conditions
appropriate to the areas.

-Z-
Should you have any questions concerning this matter or desire information
or assistance regarding reclamation procedures or erosion control techniques,
please feel free to get in touch.
Yours very truly,
G. J. Kraynak
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section .
GJK:jaw
cc: Mr. W. P. Preslar
Per. J. R. Brisley

/
Jame 29r 1972
Vro John W. Graham
,Superior Stone Co.
P. 0. Box 2479
Ralei.gur North. Carolina 27602 _
Dear Mr. Graham,
Your applications for mining permits for the following mines have
'been found to meet the requirements. of Go S. 74-511
- Lexington - Davidson County
Lemon Springs - Leo County
Ksuespolis - Hadm County
Arrarood - Meckdenburg Comty -
Bakers Quarry - Union County
Belgrade,- Onaloa County
Burlington - Alamance County
Charlotte- Mecklenburg County
Davidson - Mecklenburg County
Fountain - Pitt Canty
Asheboro - Randolph County
Garner Quarry - Wake County ,
Hickory Quarry - Catawba Comity
Jamestown Quarry - Gu$lford County
Kings !-fountain Quarry - Cleveland Canty
ficni Buret Quarry - Craven County
Pomona quarry - Gailford Canty .
ReidsvilleQuarry-Fockin&ham Canty
Siler City Quarry - Chatham County
Statesville Quarry - Lredell Canty
ifoodleaf G,uarey - Rowan Comity
Your applioationsr including.the reclamation nrnna# are hereby approved
by the Departmort. -
I am enclosing a form for yaw use In securing a Surety Bond In
the amount of twenty-five thousand ($25,0O0.00) dollars, as-requirod by
G. S. 74-54. Please return the completed Bond as executed by your Suurety.
Upon receipt of the Bond your Mining Permit will be issued.
Sincerely, '
'. J. Craig McKenzie
State Mining Engineer
JCMrve MINING DIVISION '
Enclosure
i
1

INSPECTED BY: t�ciiy+F,S Z�..S;'mnnc
INSPECTION REPORT
Company: A 4721 IV40� 8f7 Gj County:_e,YI/
Mine- A.s//e, e-T wie lar91 Permit Number: CtL /
Date Inspected: Date of last inspection:..
Product: Erg; cA Pi' .547,41 P Person Contacted:_ • iN• c�u/1 ! No_��_
I. Remarks - Measures Taken
A. Erosion Controls L'/-alien ;'c it?7Rr Ko J _^
B,. Waste Disposal: wztsle !S c%r/? -OZJ2 _
C. Reclamation:_/. WhrlP / !1 �nfc✓ tAI/ is a _
U NCA leizez —5roOP� CPA cq Vp7I0u lfe,,j y2ennZ_
II. Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
f'1/'A84.1reTL�
RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS-
C/raced wa%r Uru/%�i en sVs�B/n
Deficiency letter needed Letter Sent /a-w-73 Reinspection Needed_

State of North Carolina
➢epartment of Natural and Economic Resources
Office of Earth Resources
Mining Division
A N N U A L R E C L A M A T I 0 N R E P O R T
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at.
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine Castle Havne Quarry Permit Number 65-1
County New Hanover Telephone [phone] or 919/675-0311
Name of Company Martin Narietta Aggregates, Southeast Division
Mailing Address P. 0. Box 2479, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings ponds 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres
(c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(d) Mine Excavation 12 Acres
TOTAL 12 Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months. 12
4. Describe measures taken for erosion control.
5. Indicate amount of reclamation
carried out
in last
12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds
0
Acres
(c) Waste Piles
0
Acres
(b) Stockpiles
0
Acres
(d) Mine Excavation
0
Acres
(Continued on reverse side)

6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title
r
Date 4.27-73
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

INSPECTED BY:..3n„re25 S Ve,*S NO.
N1 .v1 INSPECTION REPORT
Company: AZ4/1TiN
Mine: CA57i/ /?Ay/UW a-4"y Permit Number: 65-/
Date Inspected: Date of last inspection,: 17-/2- 7.7
Product: et'✓S (% SfcYJE+ /4, Person Contacted: Ae ,276C� JU/
I. Remarks - Measures Taken /
A. Erosion Control- &deo,6
B. Waste Disposal: ,4
C. Reclamation; Y-AA A10K
AA6 6ee4g leveled
II. Annual Reports - Adequacy of plan
RECOMMENDATIONS
/& COMMENTS;_ /fill 'G//JS('// LUdiP-Y Sci.Sy'Plk. / JTi// Q'Ol�� _
r.
v
Oi-
Y
Deficiency letter needed Letter Sent / �� % Reinspection Needed_

State of North Carolina tigTE RSCEfNE2
Department of Natural and Economic Resources rICIP i97.
-d
.Office of Earth Resources , 3
Minis$ D1Yle iOlE OF. IC OF LPmR RESOURCES
_ !4mINa DIV!S!OR
ANNUAL -R,`E Dt'A M A T'0 TN R-E P 0'aT ' --
"Within 30 days after completion or termination of mining on an area under permit or within 30
days after each aniversary of the issuance of the oprating permit, whichever is earlier, or at
such later date as may be provided by rules and regulations of the Department, and each year
thereafter until reclamation is completed and approved, the operator shall file a report of
activities completed during the preceding year on a form prescribed by the Department."
G.S. 74-55 "The Mining Act of 1971"
Name of Mine Castle Rayne Quarry Permit Numbet- 65-1
County New Hanover Telephone [phone] or 675-0311
Name of Company Martin Marietta Aggregates. Southeast Division
Mailing Address P. O. Box 2479, Raleigh, N. C. 27602
1. If mine is now inactive, indicate date of termination of mining. Date
2. Indicate new acreage affected by mining in last 12 months.
(a)
Tailings ponds
0
Acres
0
(b)
Stockpiles
Acres
(c)
Waste Piles
0
Acres
(d)
Mine Excavation
15
Acres
TOTAL
15
Acres
3. Estimate the new acreage to be affected by mining in the next 12 months.
4• Describe measures taken for erosion control.
9
5. Indicate amount of reclamation carried cut in last 12 months.
(a) Tailings Ponds 0 Acres (c) Waste Piles 0 Acres
(b) Stockpiles 0 Acres (d) Mine Excavation 2 Acre
(Continued on reverse side)

�:►
6. Describe reclamation carried out in last 12 months.
We continued the casting of overburden back into the depleted pit plus
settling waste water in portions of the pit.
Signature of person responsible for reclamation
Title
Date Z - 7
Complete and return to:
Mining Division
Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687.
Raleigh, forth Carolina 27611

P 0. BOX 2479 TELEPHONE [phone] RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
JOHN W. GRAHAM
VICE PRESIDENT PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT
Mr. J. Craig McKenzie
State AUning Engineer
Division of Natural and
Economic Resources
P. 4. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
A O/V/S/ON OF
IWA AV 77M
M4MJ71A=_=A4
May lb, 1972
We would like to make the following amendments to our applications
for a mining permit:
Page 2, question C.3.
Blasting will be conducted so as to prevent damage by thrown
rocks and'from excessive vibration. Any natural feature,
such as hedgerow of trees or ridges, will be left undisturbed.
Where necessary rows of trees will be established between
excavation and neighboring property or vegetated earth berm
will be established. Reasonable safeguards, such as guard
rails, fences, and oversize rocks will be located as close to
dangerous openings as possible.
Page 3, question C.4.(1).
Substantial deposits of sediment in stream beds and lakes will
be prevented by establishing a stable slope angle in unconsoli-
dated material. Waste water from plant and storm runoff carry-
ing salt from spoils piles and active mining area will be
directed by drainage ditches or terraces to settling ponds
before discharging downstream. Revegetation will begin on
ditch banks and on spoils piles no longer in use as soon as
feasible after construction.
Page 3, question C.4.(2).
Measures taken to prevent landslides would include stripping
loose, unconsolidated material from the top of pit or Quarry
wall for a safe distance, but in no case less than 10 feet;
this unconsolidated material will be sloped to the angle of
repose and revegetated if necessary to prevent erosion.
Mining methods shall be selected which will ensure wall and
bank stability, including benching as necessary to obtain -a
safe overall slope.

Mr. J. Craig McKenzie
May 16, 1972
Page 2
Amendments to Reclamation Plan
Page 2, question 3.
This operation does not yield any toxic pollutants that would
be hazardous to animal or fish life. 'dater in ponds that
remain on the property will be accessible to and suitable for
wildlife use. Ramps and access roads into pit will be left.
Permanent ditches will be constructed with sloping banks
stabilized with vegetation to offer access and to prevent
siltation.
Page 2, question 4.
Reasonable safeguards, such as guard rails, fences, and berms,
will be provided as close to dangerous openings as possible.
The face of overburden material will -be set back at least
10 feet from quarry wall and sloped to the angle of repose.
Mining methods will be selected which will ensure wall and
bank stability, including benching as necessary to obtain a
safe overall slope. Whenever possible, natural wooded areas
adjacent to pit will remain undisturbed, or species of trees
native to'the area will be planted.
Page 3, question.$.
Permanent diversion ditches and stream channels will be
established to a gradient, width, and depth as near as
possible like that existing prior to mining. Banks will be
sloped to the angle of repose and stabilized with vegetation
and/or rip -rap to minimize erosion.
Page 3, question 10.
The surface gradient will be established wherein no slope will
be greater than 34 degrees, keeping in mind that accessibility
to as much of the area as possible would be desirable. The
method of achieving these gradients will be by grading and/or
backfilling.
JWG/ jc r

i
SUPERIOR STONE CC
WOODS Gfog
10
CP •c° � � 1� ,� P e
gay/
srURG
e
\ ��
OReFk \ P{ Qlyt /• a N� / S
6,9
NA
P
, ` �
� AREA
„�CnGEG
J
'
i
F
d C' > °
o ,CE 3j�PLANT
T E
i
2 E
r T;"{yfRES
Q\ x
SC AL. ES
I4o;I
Ylpl\
tk
`oc
�� x� Il li
W A NINON ZRAC
C3I 1
YL I
9 Rya �I q �I
41CC
III
r,
o�
i
c� ` 1
c`4.
SUPERIOR .:TONE CC.
i I
ml
p,
Z
4
NEW HANOVER CO.,N.0 SCALE. 1 = 3_ CO
MARCH 1372
,trWs,E,p 7-1e-7a

Mn�n..
UResot North Carolina Department of Natural
i'
urces & Community Development
r James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor James A. Summers, Secretary
w "
July 23, 1984
Mr. Paul Thomsen
Exploration Dept.
Ideal Basic Industries
P. 0. Box 1949
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
RE: Castle Hayne Mine Release, New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Thomsen:
An inspection was made of the Castle Hayne Mine on July 13, 1984.
The inspection confirmed that all areas -under mining permit no. 65-3 had
been transferred to Martin Marietta Aggregates.
Therefore Ideal Basic Industries is released from responsibility for
this site with respect to The Mining Act of 1971. I am enclosing the bond
form for $25,000.00.
Please advise if we can be of further assistance
Very truly yours,
Stephen G. Conrad
JDS:gf .
Enclosure
cc: Horace Wilson
Gerald Kraynak
PO Bc, 27567 Ralebh. Not mnalelina 2761t4667 faleo7me9i97334964

,
o a"IWO
0^ Q CLpJ. v t Y11+'111J O+Cf,Ls . 7, • . . J
MOM i
rA;'
m-
•
All
Ir
�. [��`�• �V�' ',w'i� Jy O, � b nfjs �`.- �Y 1 G,.'i}� " V�\ ♦ L��`p -
"`� =. `�Q rye- _T. N .t d ! l�•L�l '�'�ar �.ibt•� TT��, +D" 'C
�cQ c .a 1 r 1 �. �F � ���,L •t V� _
-
:' 1n ryiF ICI ,, y ` L
+'F
/}g��, �+,� <, day •£, .. � i J.C?�; r _
n
u
or

RECEIVED
I -Lb
Di OF QUALITY +ECTIONS
D
February 1, 1980
Mr. Charles F. Gardner, Chief
Land Quality Section
Dept. of Natural Resources
P.O.Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Gardner:
Ideal Basic Indusi
Cement Division
ExOlorallon Department
P O. Box 1949
Fort Collins. ColwaW W521
303 a62 5603
303 e82 5687
- :l,;-..
Re: Castle Hayne Mine Permit
No. 65-3
Your letter requesting an updated mine map with the 1979
Annual Reclamation Report was not received in this De-
partment until after 1979 report information was furn-
ished to the Castle Hayne plant.
Maps of all quarry operations are normally updated by
photogrammetric methods each three years. The report
mentioned Ideal's schedule to update the Castle Hayne
quarry map xcc-1377 during 1980 and that minor quarry
advance since the last map revision (August 1977) was
as previously anticipated.
�,�Ad) In compliance with your letter request, we enclose
bp.A+, two marked prints of xcc-1377. The current affected
areas are classified and outlined by colored lines to
C(
� indicate location of the acreages given.
y' Cr10Sincerely,
R. E. Marsh
Properties Manager
REM:iem
Enc.
cc: A. L. Simon, Castle Hayne Plant Manager

3
j
LEGEND
x SPOT ELEVATIONS
Q SURVEY POINT BY IDEAL SURVEYORS
---
---_= ROADS
----- TRAILS j
EDGE OF WOODED AREA
-xx- FENCE
- - - INTERMITTENT STREAM
PROPERTY �BOUNDARY,IDEAL
✓
r
DESIuNATION OF AFFECTED AREAS AS OF DEC. 31, 1979 (PLANIMETER MEASURE - ACRES)
Plant operating 100 Ac., plus 30 acres added for
roadways etc. not outlined. (Also not updated
since some included in other categories), 130
-- - -- -- -J Quarry Excavation 1 172
Affected prior to Act (a 26 acre inactive west
refuse area is not shown on map xce-1377) --
Overburden placed on previously undisturbed land 49
Clarification and/or refuse ponds 144
Grading started in 1979 not fully reclaimed
(12 acres) --
Expected future operation 18 acres plus adjacent
areas reported as affected when clay only was
removed
AiAWAW AJ► rl Total 495
Q 500 1ODD 1500 - 2000 2500
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL( —)ARE BELOW SEA LEVEL
PHOTOGRAPHY DATED MAR 1977
j
LEGEND
x SPOT ELEVATIONS
Q SURVEY POINT BY IDEAL SURVEYORS
---
---_= ROADS
----- TRAILS j
EDGE OF WOODED AREA
-xx- FENCE
- - - INTERMITTENT STREAM
PROPERTY �BOUNDARY,IDEAL
✓
r
DESIuNATION OF AFFECTED AREAS AS OF DEC. 31, 1979 (PLANIMETER MEASURE - ACRES)
Plant operating 100 Ac., plus 30 acres added for
roadways etc. not outlined. (Also not updated
since some included in other categories), 130
-- - -- -- -J Quarry Excavation 1 172
Affected prior to Act (a 26 acre inactive west
refuse area is not shown on map xce-1377) --
Overburden placed on previously undisturbed land 49
Clarification and/or refuse ponds 144
Grading started in 1979 not fully reclaimed
(12 acres) --
Expected future operation 18 acres plus adjacent
areas reported as affected when clay only was
removed
AiAWAW AJ► rl Total 495
Q 500 1ODD 1500 - 2000 2500
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL( —)ARE BELOW SEA LEVEL
PHOTOGRAPHY DATED MAR 1977

41IL
off
r
„ I
IL
.,
rilrfit
rr rr ilrr'ryriir!`jrri A
r rr ,
L
sr r it r r rr ! r1>
�r�'iNi4Y
r
ri �ire`
jj
its 1 A.
LL
v'v°� 1
8.
���h .e nsc
t Wlos
o ° F''G`° a II
e
-.
oe o o e
DjhG .:1 t ` a. e0
e
s^
(, � ° sra ere sre enn
°w °°.
a a < e.a °
81-� Qt3 ere
lo
4
0 0 a°1 0° Icy.
V
s
y
CAL
srArya! GIs O�- DEc. /9B2
Oo�,P.rT/ON AF64 IM0
----Farm OPE,�.rrrov�A46*4
REVISION F
off
r
„ I
IL
.,
rilrfit
rr rr ilrr'ryriir!`jrri A
r rr ,
L
sr r it r r rr ! r1>
�r�'iNi4Y
r
ri �ire`
jj
its 1 A.
LL
v'v°� 1
8.
���h .e nsc
t Wlos
o ° F''G`° a II
e
-.
oe o o e
DjhG .:1 t ` a. e0
e
s^
(, � ° sra ere sre enn
°w °°.
a a < e.a °
81-� Qt3 ere
lo
4
0 0 a°1 0° Icy.
V
s
y
CAL
srArya! GIs O�- DEc. /9B2
Oo�,P.rT/ON AF64 IM0
----Farm OPE,�.rrrov�A46*4
REVISION F
O
f
0'
i
74
13
9
` LEGEND
X SPOT ELEVATIONS
SURVEY POINT BY IDEAL SURVEYORS
--__= ROADS
EDGE OF WOODED AREA
-X--X-- FENCE
- - - INTERMITTENT STREAM
PROPERTY BOUNDARY, IDEAL
RAILROAD
— — BOUNDARY OF DISTURBED AREA
DRILL HOLE
W
L ...�
OVERBURDEN TO BE REDISTURBED
`-'216
OA
OLD QUARRY
30
AO
REFUSE & CLARIFICATION POND 1 (DEPLETED QUARRY)
115
O
REFUSE & CLARIFICATION POND 2 (DEPLETED QUARRY)
101
O
FT �
PERIMETER OVERBURDEN PILES (R & C POND 1)
41
For
Eventual Rec'1 Pond 1+ Q
®
CEMENT PLANT & ASSOCIATED (ROADS NOT OUTLINED 20 Ac
)
-
STOCKPILES (MINOR AREAS INCLUDED IN PLANT
121
AREAS QUARRIED NEAR REFUSE POND 2
(OVERBURDEN ABOVE POND LEVEL)
54
O
PRE -LAW AREA NOW RECLAIMED (30+ 8 ACRES)
--
See
Application Rec'l Plan P 2, 3
QUARRY 1982-1992--158 ACRES INCLUDES 30 AC. OLD
QUARRY AND 26 AC OVERBURDEN TO BE REDISTURBED
NET NEW AREA 158 - 30 - 26 =
102
0
O 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
590
OA
i
N '� Ideal Basic Industries
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET Cement Division
III1I DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL( -)ARE BELOW SEA LEVEL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENVER.COLORADO
PHOTOGRAPHY DOTED FEB. 1980
ISSUE DRAWN ���cw <ff ",
25- 6.az a«_is>P°. RAW MATERIAL SURVEY CHECKED AV
�f s-i2-E
REVISION E REVISION D REVISION C REVISION B REVISION A _SEaiA QUARRY RESERVE AREA APPROVED A 5--/2-e
Alper ,Qo�y�Ey SCALE=50o,
CASTLE HAYNE PLANT ccc - 1377c
2-.5 yr

A
2
/j i'�p 'j. F•
NY.
.. 1 .. 11 fig-„;, { ....�,.:,:•..
t A
It
y.
Y j
W
s^,� � f:�. ����1 i A '` • is
i
yr.

Z
o
O
z
�
Q
0
o
p
LQ
r
O
W
Z
cr
ILz
O
a
J
O
O
a
=
It
J
>
Q
N
O
3
0
o
U
Z
U
z
Q
Z
N W
0
~
�
x
m
N W
Z
W
w
O
LL
0
O
W
~
Q
Z
O
w
Q
L1J
3
o
n
L
a
F-
Z
w
a
F-
w
�Q
Q
Q
U
16
6
Q
r
d
cc
.,
0
r
s
4
Q
cr
d
r
°rl
N
oQf
r
r
a°
9
co
1
rj
a�g�
r
00r
o4
s000rn
Q
rU
W
W
W
W33
3
W
3
3
3
3
3
W
3
W
W
3
WIW
,�
G
4
p�
O�
trJ
O
O
Q
iPO
3n
Q
O
ni
Q
a
4
P=
O
4
1(I
�
otl
�QIaro°s
In
9os8b�
ova
ZdIJI
JINd�dImnJ1222PZZ
ZJ�Z
W
Qd
UA
WU.
C7
i
"�iJFZa
(7dW
r
Q
u
(to0oLi
z�
r15_zd
ad,nr
P
N
Z SL62
3 SO,�
V
6�
/ham
0
J
Q
7
4
4
d
r
Nr
a
o
v
6
co
coco
go
A
W
W
W
Wu1333�133
333W
PaOo,ns
a
n
ds5gsdmsm��sQ�
Z
Z
cf7
(0
((I
Z
N
Z J>
Z
Z
z
z
Z
W
4coj0
z4
a
LO
�4Coto
LLC9Z-�Y�
FZ
P
r40
.4
/3
v
J
Q
d
I'
3
cc
w
r
< tj
-
x
3
n
41
a
u
m
J
M
C
Q0
l
a
p
J
y
0
m
e
e
0
C~
p
I
V
O
e
o
O
O
S
J
O
W
LL'
W_
-a
O
2
Q
9
y,
a
p
J
w
O
W
W 7
>
u
S
w$
J
Z
W
z
N
'°
N
ui
W
f¢
C
m
J
"'J
>
W
p
a
c
u
c
7
P
O
O
4
4
O
m
O
U
p,
I
p
i
i3
W
�
C,,i
N
0
0N
v
iw
ww
3w
wlww
W
33 333ww�,
W
-IP
2 Ln
In
O
rn
v
m
r
K
r
iln
r
o
r r N
v ol�i
al
�t9to
c0
-K%-N
r
�O
N
NIP
y
4
P'OvU1-SO
N r 'cnN 'IO
yy
d70�7
v
in c1
cJN
yy iO
t0
�0-0'0
9o-a
i'
W�
h°'. •iJ v°cp
co
°0
O
P
v
0--
N
O N N m n N
V'N
O
ai c0
to
UJNcnNm
00
N
cnlz 2 Z7'Z
ZZ
z 0c0Ito
Y J', 2li 3.x
W
a
to
0
Cl1w
11
Q
S
N
crW
lz>
LLc92
4
as
cq
nko
J1
9 in
N_
v
sl
I I
ul
4
QQ
1
a
it
sNNO
SI
1
Q
4
=
=Q0
I
of
I
i l
LL
I
i
W
al
I
I
d
I
Y
91
l d
31
Z
S
iN?
G
M
d
K
d
a
Z
d
m
N
O
O
O
0 <
3
m
a
W
P
p
2
U
Q
-
m
w
w
a
U
ONO
3
a
J
O
rc
W
W
Z
p
U
JQ
O
a
m a '
� m r
� r
_ N ,
p 0 K
M U• <
a < a
Q-