29-13_1_Redacted

NCO
Energy, Minerul&
Land Resources
ENVIRONNEMRL OV4LITY
December 1, 2017
Jack Garbvey
Hanson Aggregates Southeast LLC
2101 Gateway Centre Blvd Suite 100 0
Morrisville, NC 27560
RE. Mining Permit No. 29-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Jack Garbvey:
ROY COOPER
covri or
MICHAEL 5, REGAN
sermrary
TRACY DAVIS
oarrmr
This letter is to advise you of recent amendments to the North Carolina Mining Act of 1971 which impact the
permit term of your existing mining permit. Pursuant to the passage of House Bill 56, which became law on October 4,
2017 as SL 2017-209, all existing mining permits and any newly issued mining permits are to be issued for the life of site
or for the duration of the lease term. The "life of site" means the period from the initial receipt of a permit for the operation
until the mining operation terminates and the required reclamation is completed.
Considering the above, this letter hereby modifies your existing mining permit to remove all references to the prior
expiration date to convert your permit to a life of site or lease permit effective immediately. No action is required on your
part for this modification to be effective. Please attach this letter to your existing mining permit for future reference. The
mine name and permit number on the permit document, and all existing operating and reclamation conditions contained
therein, shall remain in full force and effect. Furthermore, all provisions of GS §74-51 and GS §74-52 still apply to all new,
transferred and modified mining permits.
In addition to the life of site or lease mining permit provision, SL 2017-209 also enacted a new annual mining
permit operating fee of $400 per mining permit number_ By statute, the initial payment of this annual $400 fee must be
submitted to this office by December 31, 20W — see the attached Invoice to remit the initial annual fee payment by this
deadline. Beginning in 2018, the $400 annual operating fee must be submitted by July 1 of each year with the required
Annual Reclamation Report as required by GS §74-55. Failure to submit the fee by the required deadline will result in a
$50/month late fee and could result in the denial of future permit actions and/or revocation of your mining permit
Lastly, pursuant to GS §74-54, the cap on reclamation bonds has been raised from $500,000 to $1 million. Any
adjustments needed in existing bonds will be initiated by this office or addressed during your next requested permit action
unless you contact this office with a written request to have your bond reevaluated.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local zoning regulations. The
responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations remains with you.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter_ If you have any questions on the above, please contact Ms. Judy
Wehner, Assistant State Mining Specialist, or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
William "Toby" Vinson, Jr., PE, GPM'
Interim Director, DEMLR
slnteor Norc R.,ouna I Envimnnaeidal Quality I rn.TAy Wav,al and Land R wam,5
512N.Salisbury Street 11612 Mail Service Cvn¢r I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699"1612
9197079200

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E, Davis, PE, CPM
Director
March 25, 2014
Mr. Jack Garvey
Hanson Aggregates Southeast LLC
2101 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
RE: Permit No. 29-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Dear Mr. Garvey:
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
Your application for renewal of the above referenced mining permit has been approved.
A copy of the renewed permit is enclosed. The new expiration date is March 25, 2024.
The conditions in the permit renewal were based primarily upon the initial application.
Modifications were made as indicated by the renewal request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. 1 would like to draw your particular attention to the
following conditions where minor additions or changes were made: Operating Condition Nos.
3C, 4C, 5A through D, 10B and 12E and Reclamation Condition Nos. 2E and 3.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 158 acres and the amount of land
you are approved to disturb is 66 acres.
Please review the renewed permit and contact Judy Wehner, Assistant State Mining
Specialist, at [phone] should you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
�''
J ne1 r P S Boye ,
hate Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JSB/jw
Enclosures
CC" Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton-WRC, w/enclosures
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone [phone] I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury -Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: http://oortal.ncdenr,org/web/Ir/land-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast LLC
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the.operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: March 25 2024

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department,
and in conformity with -the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of
this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
April 24, 1.995: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Nello L
Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates Inc.
May 21, 1999: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina Inc.
March 19, 2002: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Hanson
Aggregates Carolina Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast Inc.
October 26,2_009: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Hanson
Aggregates Southeast Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast LLC.

Page 3
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until March 25, 2024,
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater_ and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission,
B. Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Stormwater Program m to secure any necessary storm water permits or other
approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of
Air Quality.
B. The permanent access (plant entrance) road shall be paved a minimum of 50
feet at its junction with SR 2237. During processing operation, water trucks or
other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving
the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that waterway or
wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse or wetland.

Page 4
C. All buffer zones shown on the Mine Map and Erosion Control Plan received by
the Land Quality Section on January 31, 2014 dated December 2013 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and approved earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. The operator shall notify the Winston-Salem Regional Office, Land Quality
Section, at least 48 hours prior to beginning any of the initial land disturbing
activities indicated in the approved application for a mining permit and any
modifications to this permit thereafter.
B. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
C. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine
Map and Erosion Control Plan received by the Land Quality Section on January
31, 2014 and the supplemental information received on December 16, 2013 and
December 17, 2013 with the following additions:
The entire temporary stream crossing through Abbotts Creek as indicated
on the Mine Map shall consist of clean stone, not earth fill.
2. Appropriate information for the construction of the bridge across Abbotts
Creek, including a sequence of construction and construction details, shall
be provided to the Land Quality Section for its review and approval prior to
on -site construction.
3. Additional sediment control measures, such as silt fence, shall be provided
and maintained at the toe -of the bridge abutments to prevent off -site
sedimentation to Abbotts Creek until a detailed plan has been approved by
the Land Quality Section as required by Operating Condition No. 4C2.
D. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not
limited to, expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden or waste disposal areas.

Page 5
E. All diversion ditches/channels shall be properly constructed and stabilized to
ensure that all surface water runoff from the affected areas at the site will be
directed to appropriate erosion and sediment control measures to prevent offsite
sedimentation.
5.' Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted on the Mine Map and Erosion Control Plan
received by the Land Quality Section on January 31, 2014 shall be monitored at
least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of consolidated material (rock) ir
the initial pit area to allow for the determination of pre-existing (static)
groundwater levels.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock and
grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into unweathered rock, whichever is
deeper. The wells shall be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits or approvals to construct these wells shall be
obtained from the N.C. Division of Water Resources.
C. The observation wells shall be monitored quarterly at the same day and
approximate time of day. The static water levels shall be measured with an
accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum point and
a record of the water levels maintained. The quarterly precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these records
shall be provided to the Department on or about the end of each quarter. Static
water level monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
D, To determine the water quality parameters of groundwater at the site, water
samples shall be taken from each of the seven observation wells at the same
monitoring frequency stipulated by Operating Condition No. 5C above and
analyzed for the following parameters: iron (Fe), nitrate (NO3) hydrogen --ion
activity (pH), hardness and color. Said analysis shall be provided to.both the
Land Quality Section and Aquifer Protection Section for review at the same time
the above records are submitted to the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which
can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels,
the erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient
to restrain such erosion.

Page 6
Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the quarry opening shall be
graded to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized
within 60 days of completion: Furthermore, a minimum ten (10) foot wide
horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of
any overburden slope.
Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
Blasting
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance
no farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or
leased by the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air
overpressure, and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as
provided under Operating Condition Nos. 813 and 8D of this permit). The following
blasting conditions shall be observed by the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons
and adjacent property from surface blasting:
A. Ground Vibration With Monitoring:
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling
house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.
10.0
10.0
Z
a
Z.0
2 intncc
A0
13
3
1
1.
L
'3
07
0.6
1i
0.7
6.6
PA
o.s
Q
0
O.A
6
0.3
0.3
E
a2'
O2
0.1
100
an
BEngt vibration Frmgvoncy. H¢
Figure '! Aftemetivr! h/asfin9 level cri[erie
(SJu/'Ce
modia<e0 lrom Frgurc+'$_,, 2ureau of :Nines RT85G
])

Page 7
B. Ground Vibration Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
W = (D/Ds)2 Ds = D
Wu2
V = 160(DS)" a
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
Ds = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per
second, for the purposes of this Section.
C. Air blast With Monitoring:
Air blast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129
decibels linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted
area such as a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or
institutional building, unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the
seismograph microphone as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measuring System, in Hz in dBL
0.1
Hz
or lower -flat response
134
peak
2.0
Hz
or lower -flat response
133
peak
6.0
Hz
or lower -flat response
129
peak
D. Air blast Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
U = 82 (DIWO")-l.2
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):

Page 8
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x10-9)
Confined Air blast/Overpressure (dBL)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).,
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Air blast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).
The air blast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section.
E. Record Keeping:
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to
closest offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of
the blast. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies
shall be provided to the Department upon request.
F. Excessive _Ground Vibration/Air blast Reporting:
If ground vibration or Air blast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting
may occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization
to blast at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the
high ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal
approval. Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
G. Flyrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and
repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.

Page 9
H. Flyrock Reporting::
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on
the mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the investigation shall be provided to the Department
within 10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions
that will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with
the approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine
site.
Studies:
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a
level allowed by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
J. Notice:
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24-hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section Regional Office prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A. A physical barrier (minimum of four foot high) consisting of large boulders placed
end -to -end or fencing (such as a woven wire or four strand barbed wire fence
with 4 x 4 wood posts at maximum 10 foot spacing), or some other acceptable
alternative shall be maintained at all times along the perimeter of any highwall to
prevent inadvertent public access. In addition, a minimum 20 foot wide
horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the junction between the top of rock
and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
B. Within the first five years of quarry operations, the entre property or, at a
minimum, those areas of highwall with a vertical face exceeding 10 feet shall be
enclosed by a six foot high chain link fence with three strands of barbed wire
provided along the top.

Page 10
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening
methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Map and Erosion Control Plan received by the Land Quality Section on
January 31, 2014. In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or Virginia pines or other
acceptable evergreen species shall be planted as deemed appropriate by the
Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
C. Tree species that provide year-round visual screening of the site from adjacent
properties such as Leyland Cypress, evergreens, etc., shall be employed at the
site in areas in need of additional screening. Specifically, in addition to the
locations noted on the drawings, tree planting shall be along the northwest side
of the haul road between it and the adjacent Kepley property. Such plantings
shall be located adjacent to the haul road rather than at the property boundary.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any approved revisions to
it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.

Page 11
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land
Resources considers the following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to
those specifically listed under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5. steel reinforced air hoses
6. drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources prior to commencement of
such disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established
E. Used, clean concrete shall only be allowed on permitted quarry sites that have
obtained a valid air permit and are allowed to operate crushing operations for the
purposes of recycling and reuse provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Appropriate quality control measures shall be taken when the used
concrete arrives onsite to ensure that all such concrete processed onsite
is clean, inert material.
2. Used, clean concrete shall be temporarily stockpiled and processed within
existing approved affected areas draining to existing approved erosion
and sedimentation control measures.
3. No used, clean concrete material shall be permanently disposed of onsite.
4. Any foreign material that may be found within the used concrete must be
separated from the concrete and properly recycled or disposed off -site.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.

Page 12
14. Bonding
The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$500,000.00 blanket bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 13
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any high wall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:

Page 14
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12.A.
through E.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the following:
Permanent Seeding Specifications
Dates
February 15- April 1
April 1- July 31
August 1- October 25
Species
Korean Lespedeza
Fescue
Redtop
Winter rye (grain)
Common Bermuda
Lespedeza (unscarified)
German millet
October 25- February 15 Rye (grain- temporary)
Soil Amendments
Rate. Lbs/Acre
10
40
1
15
50
30
40
120
Lime: 2000 Ibslacre or follow recommendations from a soil test.

Page 15
Fertilizer: 1000 Ibs/acre 8-8-8 or 10-10-10, or follow recommendations from a soil
test.
Mulch: All seeded areas shall be mulched using small grain straw at a rate of
2000 Ibs/acre and anchored appropriately.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued November 2, 1992, modified April 24, 1995, May 21, 1999, and
March 19, 2002, renewed December 18, 2003 and. modified October 26, 2009, is
hereby renewed this 25th day of March, 2014 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
By: �I S
Tracy E. Davis, Director
Division f Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

NOTES
1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PERMIT RENEWALS AND/OR
MODIFICATIONS,
2. FOR MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS, SEE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THIS SITE WILL MAINTAIN A 50—FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER ALONG PERMITTED
i
BOUNDARY.
4. NO NEW LAND AND/OR NEW EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS RENEWAL. SEE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS AND DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS. - -
5. THE RECLAMATION PLAN REFLECTS THE INTERIM 10 YEAR RECLAMATION PLAN.
6. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL
RECLAMATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. i
7. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN.
8. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ABOVE WATER LEVEL (I. E. ROAD SHOULDERS, BERMS, DAMS, ETC.) TO BE STABILIZED
f x �
WITH VEGETATION. IF SUFFICIENT COVER DOES NOT EXIST, OVERSEER AS IN SEEDING SCHEDULE. �// ! g� % -� � ; ,_ - ,V„r, :y�
9. AFTER SEEDING AS PER SEEDING SCHEDULE, BERMS AND SLOPES BEYOND ROAD SHOULDERS OUTSIDE THE OFFICE Ni
✓ /
AREA SHALL BE NOT MOWED AND ALLOWED TO REVERT TO NATURAL
VEGETATION.
rtron, I1
10. BERMS ARE TO BE BUILT AS MATERIAL BECOMES AVAILABLE. THE EXTENT OF THE BERMS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN 1 - _ 'a p .sr q\
ARE ANTICIPATED; FINAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY.
11. BASE TOPOGRAPHY PREPARED BY: - „ 1
CONTINENTAL AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. _ i;.a� '\\ter �, t a' !1 * r
3356 REGAL DRIVE
ALCOA, TN 37701
[phone]
12. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM DAVIDSON COUNTY TAX MAP.
13. EXISTING MINING PERMIT NO. 92-13
LEXINGTON QUARRY
FULLER ROAD
MYRTLE SHOAF
LEXINGTON, NC 27292
[phone] - H -
TOBY LEE. NC OPERATIONS MANAGER A,
I'I
lil
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION of OBSERVATION WELL
oN-6
REV NO DESCRIPTION OF REVISION:
140RACE v 'LUMBER Go' GRAPHIC SCALE:
DATE: 'YARBOrc00GH v
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1^ 200'
a 600 200 0 200 600
JO
i
g m
W V Nan
a
g
e 7yg'=ac'
rppm@
Z NWSF
c -.
c
m
J
Q
F 2
J
J
F
~
z cc
�Oa0
zQ
N
In
t/)
W
W v
19z
w
tip_
F'
O O
1%
W
� �
Z
� 9
�yX
Q
W
J
z
O
N
z
z
a
J
IL
O
Iz
0
IW O
19 cc
W W
d �
d
a
W
z
DESIGNED:
LAB
DRAWN:
LAB
CHECKED:
LAB
DATE:
DEC. 2013
REGION: SOUTH
LOCATION: LEXINGTON
HA-L£tlNCiGN MHECP-1
DWG FILE.
SCALE:
HORIZONTAL,
T' = 200'
VERTICAL:
>HEET NO.:
M&ECP-7
1
OF. 3
F,�
1,

• 0
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Ayyhroa7NAne AIdNk(h lltYl� Pn5CdNMe: 1 BA YQYVE lLe../
Ayyll[.(PeenR )—II� c df: OAjj:tfss( . We Rfacd
j/Yti
e(
RMCAer: /A A RMF B9dX Nan: 1,NLLA cis
P
❑ No Renard ❑ ma*al m (tAakrydt km")
❑ Mad$adon (Qlff&yemlN kwdew) ❑ Tradfer ❑ Rekan
Partld Rf6M LN AA&Um I j#ail om ❑ Fee maU $ ❑ Fm Rucwi $
Plan rode adlrc atlan adt w to:
F I/ V r h W W /ial RgIOMI Ogle (2 =09U m)M; &"k the 94 " OU MWM A)7'."'".' Rain
C6di& to M egy ad &Mh Yolk a¢ DWQ* DAQ,'M" Ayyhatfa Rain Force to th dar'%Y and both egtrs to the Rr3lonal
E�wRr1
DAte: Ram! 3� m'o igI/ ,d
❑ mon �wam Resantto Dd[: RMW Reed
❑ NC WddNfe Raarai CarmdDlan Dak: RMW RtCd
❑ us mh A wAafe srrgw Datr: Rated Ra'd
ONm gyhea m ad wtad#ic mn rrgwsts thm add lad to theymma)
Pltaw /pWfti$ 3Faso of the ayrhaaflml and
ay lafaflml aqs
ta:
❑
DMaM of Pahl @ R WMUM
Dde:
Ratrd
Rend
❑
Nc Gmkgmd"setlan
DAk:
Ralad
Rad
❑
r)wft of Mmfm Fbkfff s
Date:
Ratal
Rfrd
❑
DM M of sod a wam cane AM
(yho LW
Date:
Rated
Rend
(0* wer q*Affanr o d wgF kaft radaao that add lad
to theyem&)
❑
WON of Ankw m R"
Date:
Rats(
Rend
(Ody wn ilbraw u)
❑
other.
Date:
Rmtd
wd
••susyensf Date for Comments:
!u I a
(w lam flan 25 dap femn rcelyt)
0 Pkaee wou the fo➢Arlgq:

0
0
March 21, 2014
Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
DEHNR — Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
mom
■EE
®■ N Hanson
WEIDELBERGCEMENTGroup
Subject: Response to NC DENR LQS 3/11/14 Letter
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC — Lexington Quarry
NC Mine Permit No. 29-13
10-year Mine Permit Renewal Application
Dear Ms. Judy Wehner:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
South Region
North Carolina Territory Office
2101 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560-9626
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.hanson.com
RECEIVED
�,-�AR 2 4 2014
LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
Hanson Aggregates is hereby submitting the below requested information in your March
11, 2014 letter:
"Please properly complete the attached Land Entry Agreement and return to this
office."
Please see the attached original Land Entry Agreement and one copy. Should you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact me at our Morrisville office:
[phone], or you can reach me by email: [e-mail] .
Sincerely,
Ww
Jack Garvey, Environmental Manager
Enclosures:
cc: Toby Lee, NC Operations Manager
RECEIVED
MAR 2 4 2014
LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM

•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PIRMI'I'
G. LANDENTRYAGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act or 1971 pursuant to Q.S.
74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to lake whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order
to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered
pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLICANT:
Signature, Signature:*
Print Namc: C. Wayne McDonald print Name: Toby [,cc
(Title, if applicable)
Company Windsor Investments of NC, LLC Title: NC Oocrations Manager
(11'applicablc)
Address: P.O. Box 5094 Company: I-lanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
I figh Point, NC 27262
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed: $- /c!• /y
Minc Name: I Janson Aggrceatcs — Lexinglon Quarry
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed:
RECEIVED
HAR 2 4 2614
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application. LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
One original and five (51 conics of the comnleted aonlication. six (6) conics of all location mans. mine
mans and reclamation mans, and the appropriate Processing fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the
form a check or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources must be sent to the Land Quality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover
of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staffat
[phone].
16

4 a •
MCENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
March 11, 2014
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7008 1300 0000 1126 7497
Mr. Jack Garvey
Hanson Aggregates Southeast LLC
2101 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
RE: Permit No. 29-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Dear Mr. Garvey:
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E, Skvarla, III, Secretary
We have reviewed the renewal request your company submitted for the referenced
mine site. However, the following information is needed to continue processing your
application:
Please properly complete the enclosed Land Entry Agreement and return the original to
this office.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed. In addition, please note the Land Quality Section may
request additional information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review
progresses.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies
of the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612.919-707-92201 FAX [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, {North Carolina 27604 • Internet: http://portal.ncdenr,org/webilrl
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

0
Certified Mail
Mr. Garvey
Page Two
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an
extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to
grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files
at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
ncerely,
dith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosure: LEA
CC' Mr. Matt Gantt, PE

Wehner, Judy
From: Sink, Scott
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 2:57 PM
To: Werner, Judy
Subject: 29-13 Lexington Quarry
No ESC problems with these plans. Thx.
Scott Sink
INC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, INC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUnNG
eyylfwef Nam: hAh5tNQQ Q ItI 4 /C6
II M514d NIM: A 01 Irl,
Ayfhc.lMffd///f N�o.':A1� roadl AI AA( (\.J Dde RadSrd: 1' 3 (1
RMM .. �-{� \� O � Rtwr RAM Nast.
❑ KM .{�ROnd ❑ m4caUa (bu&jmmft bcmdmlz)
❑ Mad wffov (OWdeyemd, )mmdata) ❑ TMr ❑ Rek"
❑ FOUd R&W / Adkumd iomd a ❑ Fa Nadel: s ❑ For RM*a-• ¢
?kM mde a to1' _Ihdtm LaAw to
A.i ✓) T� 1 ROIMd o!la (x f0gw aym muh the arts Re ono *a M1i°49 Ayy tem Rerw
dmikse to Om an and mach bock the Dwypnd DAQ'" A*f am Rener ro to the adw ayr a+d bak wma to the RVIMd
)
Dak: ROW / 13 11 U Rend
ElDtMaa 7 WaM RewRras Date: ROW Read
❑ NC wdkf[ Raavae common Date: ROW RWd
❑ us ni A WOO &MU Mr.. ROW ROCd
(only M Ryb1 m and RadfiemO rcq:vAtWat add lad to dwymR)
Pk" rate /Mt 3 PW oldie aPl MUM ad arty lmd MPS to.
❑ DMM of Pads A Reereadm DWe: ROW ReWd
❑ NC GMkgt l tatray seedm a*: ROW wd
❑ DhWM of Matra rae tf Date: ROW Reid
❑ DMdM of sod A water CaaaraaUM (y6u tea) Ddu ROW Raed
(Ody Oa a/jlwdM ad MAfuatO aRaa that add lad to durwo
❑ .. DIvWO 7 ArCkM A tRAay Dada RAM Red
(Ddy a. ayyl4mou)
"0) G&r. Date: ROW Rend
••slIM Date for Cofmmts: 6 d 5 I (m lda in as day, fray m o
❑ PkaR m(n r>d: � h

MEN
■■■
■ m ■ Manson
RECEtt HEIDELBERG CEMENTG roup
VED
JAN 312013
LAND QUALITY
January 30, 2014 MINING PROGF;VM
Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
DEHNR — Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
South Region
North Carolina Territory Office
2101 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560-9626
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.hanson.com
Subject: Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC — Lexington Quarry
NC Mine Permit No. 29-13
10-year Mine Permit Renewal Application
Additional Information: Observation Wells Shown on M&ECP-1 Mine Map
Dear Ms. Wehner:
Hanson Aggregates is submitting two (2) revised drawings of M&ECP-1 to show the seven (7)
approximate observation well locations as requested by you in our January 14, 2014 email
correspondence.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at our
Morrisville office: [phone], and you may also contact our contracted engineer, Tyrus
Clayton: [phone].
Sincerely,
Ja Garvey, Environmental Manager
Enclosures:
cc: Toby Lee, NC Operations Manager
C. Tyrus Clayton, Jr., PE

Wehner, Judy
From:
Wehner, Judy
Sent:
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:38 PM
To:
Garvey, Jack H (Morrisville) USA ([e-mail])
Cc:
Gantt, Matt; Sink, Scott
Subject:
Lexington Quarry 29-13
We have reviewed the renewal request your company submitted for the referenced mine site. However, the
following information is needed to continue processing your application:
Please revise the mine map to show the 7 observation well locations.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed above have been
fully addressed. In addition, please note the Land Quality Section may request additional information,
not included in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of the requested
information to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, INC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 513.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days from the date of your
receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish
to request additional time, you must submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the
deadline can not be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not
granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the
Department's files at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we encourage you to provide
the additional information requested by this letter as soon as possible. Your prompt response will help us to
complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions. Thabksl
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
[phone] fax
------------------------------------------
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may he subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may he
disclosed to third parties.

Wehner, Judy
From:
Sink, Scott
Sent:
Monday, January 13; 2014 11:09 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy
Subject:
29-13
No problems with Lexington Quarry. Only improved calcs. No plan changes.
Scott Sink
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
n
� Ll

•
•
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
For the
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Project/Number: Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC - LexingtonQuarry
Please return comments back to: Mr. Matt Gantt
Received by DAQ-WSRO on: January 6, 2014
Comments were forwarded to DLQ-WSRO on: January 8, 2014
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of air quality? No
Comments: This Land Qualitv permit renewal application does not ch;
YES
Air permit required
Air permit existing X (Permit # 07417R07)
County: Davidson
of
NO
X
Other Comments:_ Hanson AgLregates Southeast, LLC — Lexington Quarry (NC DAQ Facility ID
No. 2900242) holds an Air Quality Permit. No. 07417R07 issued on 11/3/20.11 (expires on
10/31/2016). The_nermit includes allowance for non-metallic mineral processing including: Shale
crushing, and brick and structural clay tile manufacturing. The facility_ was last inspected by DAQ-
WSRO staff on 10h612013. According to the inspection report, "There were no signs of the facility,
and no evidence that any construction had or was about to begin. The facility has been permitted
since 1993 without ever being built." The report concludes "The facility is in compliance since it does
not exist."
Reviewed by:�1-_ �-�'�T Date: January 8, 2014
Print Name: Jalal-Adduli
Central Office Reviewer:
Rev Dec 2006

• s
JAN 08 1014
LAND QUALITY $ECTi.
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brenda M. Harris, Mining Program Secretary
Laird Quality Section
FROM: Shari L. Bryant, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 6 January 2014
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal for Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC, Lexington Quarry —
Permit No. 29-13, Davidson County, North Carolina.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject permit application, Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Mining Act
of 1971 (as amended, 1982) (G.S. 7446 through 74-68 15 NCAC 5).
The applicant is requesting a renewal of their permit for mining metadiorite. The total permitted
arcs is 158 acres. The applicant indicates groundwater will pass through a settling pond, and stormwater
will be treated by sediment traps and basins prior to discharge. A 50-foot buffer will be maintained
between wetlands and natural watercourses. The reclamation plan includes allowing the excavation to fill
with water, and grading and rc-vegetating according to the re -vegetation plan.
An unnamed tributary to Abbotts Creek, a tributary to High Rock Lake in the YadlawRocDee
River basin flows through the site. Should the permit be renewed, we offer the following
recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources.
1. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a
minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed,
forested buffers along these areas will reduce impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources,
water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the site. Whereas, a grassed
buffer, particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer but it will not provide the necessary and highly
valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers. We request that sediment and erosion
control structures be located outside of these buffers.
2. Water discharges from the site should be proportional to the size of the receiving stream so the
hydrology of the stream is not altered, and all discharges should comply with NPDES permit
requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be maintained at or below the
permit requirement, High water discharge rates and turbidity can negatively impact aquatic
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
i
6 January 2014
Lexington Quarry
Permit No. 29- l3
resources within and downstream of the site. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have
numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat,
suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species.
Consider using seed mixtures (e.g., native warm season grasses) that are beneficial to wildlife in
the reclamation plan. An exact seeding mixture would need t6 take into account soil types,
moisture, pH, and degree of slope of areas to be stabilized. In addition, for relatively shallow
sediment basin reclamation, we recommend these areas be reclaimed as wetlands where
practicable. We refer the applicant to Rupert Medford, District Wildlife Biologist, at (910) 975-
0577 or ru ert.medford rr ncwildlife.or for additional information and ideas on reclamation for
wildlife.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit application. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact our office at [phone] or shari.brRant alncwildlife.org.
cc: Jack Garvey, Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC

MUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
Janl 2014
MEMORANDUM 1�7 ,
TO: Judy Wehner jq v
Land Quality Section !V 01, 7W4
FROM: Pat[] Willias— Ground WaterMMaMentSection
�fYDGLgLfrySECTip�
Division of Water Resources
SUBJECT: Comments on the Mining Pcrmil Renewal Request for:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
The Lexington Quarry, located in Davidson County, does not appear to have an unduly adverse
effect on ground water supplies since there is no dewatering proposed on site. The said mine has
registered its future groundwater withdrawals, with the Division of Water Resources, as facility
ID #0340-0001.
Facilities not in the fifteen county Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area are required to
register their water withdrawals in accordance with the North Carolina General Statute G.S. 143-
215.22H. This statue requires any non-agricultural water user who withdraws 100,000 gallons or
more in any one day of ground water or surface water to register and update withdrawals. This
statue also requires transfers of 100,000 gallons or more in any one day of surface water from
one river basin to another river basin to register and update their water transfers. Water
withdrawal registrants must complete the annual water use reporting form by April I for the
previous year.
I I'you have further questions please contact the Division of Water Resources at [phone]
or send correspondence to 1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-161 I.
1611 Mad Sentive Center, Raleigh, North Camlire 276991611
Location. 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27604
Phore: Ad9-001 DOOM FAX 919-7n 1566
Intarnel;w .ncraater org
An Equal Opslaunly IAMmNtive Action Eal*n(a

r�
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
December 20, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr, Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources
FROM: Brenda M. Harris Y
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal for Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatering Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
abcve referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by January 10,
2014 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Uh
Ibmh
Attachments DEC 23 2013 ta
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone [phone] I 1 9 T33�
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: httpl/portal.ncdenr.org/web/Irtland-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper -

.,-.. .... .�...�.._..ti.--w.aa�..�-rt.....a•�..-., _.. .'U.•VC.SpH�*..T.-n.�.. _;..+....W... ny—�. _�..e:.^' �....,
� s
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
>'m)wt mmm n a Gai�
APPIIc.1FRm1t No.: yr
cmma, j so_ Diacneabd lair. )3 r 1�In�13
ReFirM fY�✓✓,y,/
r ❑ N" ,L3I Rrn Pl
❑ Modl�Iratlarc(oatsldePennttlaunaartn)
❑ FaaW Release ❑ Addtf oad IoamaftM
I
Rfan mo Nana: iy,J
❑ Mod�ledlM (dtaAuPearC baotdarkr)
L
❑ Fa Needed: $ Fa Reeard: ` IMF �
Flrare rd*aft
1lgplh&m paw to:
�' luy k )Wkn, RVana) *a (z Modf yta; attah du'Fes RJ510M Opa Mildig A pin Rmex
Chfdf'IC't0 aC Or Md AU& k& th OWQ* DAQ'M" AyfkdLW R[II[P FI tO thf Oth[I � Wd bA ayla N Od Ro"
El�mtr)
,�D Date: Rana 1440 r3 Rand labih3
DM9M4wainRMW Date: RMnd t Rad 1
NC W dlU ReaRnnCMntlWM Dale: RMW �(/ Rued 1�
❑ US Fbh a Wilhfe 9trvlee Dale: RMW Rand
`. (0* nM aPphcanom Md m doutiM T az that add toed to theymdt)
t
FkM rade flnf 3 w o/ t6 a1pkmam and arq buffet maps to:
❑ Dt?WM a Pmir a R=Mdfan Date: Rated Red
❑ NC Gmlodteal Snn[P sin Daft: RMled Red
❑ omduqMaefw Ftshert6 Date: RMW Red
❑ Divtnan of Sall k WArr Ca AUM (Phis LW Dale: ROW Red
(Ody oto AflkaU m and mol*dtM milts t that add IMd to the pc 0
❑ D WM of AMVM a RWry Daft: RMW— Red _
(Only ma appl qum) -
❑ othn: Daft: RMtd Red
• •Suspense Date far Commntts: l I l I (w Wer than is days Pram mao
1
11 Flemt me the(ok":

•
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
December 20, 2013
Ms. Shari Bryant
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
Brenda M. Harri
Mining Program cretary
Land Quality Section
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
Mining Permit Renewal for Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by
January 10, 2014 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications,
this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that
they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your
agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be greatly
appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact
the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a
copy of your comments to the person noted in the application,
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
/bmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone] I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: http:llportal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/land-quality
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

� s
.-._.�.r. � 1��
�a
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
December 20, 2013
MEMORANDUM
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources
FROM: Brenda M. Harris 1�
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal for Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatering Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by January 10,
2014 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application,
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Ibmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone [phone] FAX. [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: htIR:Ilportal.ncdenr.org/web/ir/land-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50°% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Lehigh Hanson Lehigh Hanson Address inquiries to the acwunts able customer response line at:
RU9 o..canvruo�r, 300 E. John C ter Fray E-Mail: [e-mail]
Suite 1645
wing, Tx 759s2
V¢e00r Neme
Veneor NumEer
Cn¢[x bae
_Ch¢ek'N-iF
NCDENR-LAND QUALITY
1607576
09/26/2013
21141891
Invoic"e Date
WVMfiroi&OINtilr
_ "Remarks
Grose3AmouM
01scounl
NetlAmount
09/19/2013
MCR09192013B
lexin9mo
1,000.00
1,00000
'age 1 of TOTALS
E�7.000.00
0.00
E1,000.00

Wehner, Judy
From:
Wehner, Judy
Sent:
Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:20 PM
To:
Homewood, Sue
Cc:
Gantt, Matt; Sink, Scott
Subject:
29-13 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013
Attachments:
29-13 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013.doc
Here's the review sheet for the renewal oft he Lexington Quarry

Print Ibis form fo PDF Return PDF of this form to DEMLR CO by email. cc DEMLR RD, DWR SPU. Send a copy to the p9anitfee.
MINING ARMIT APPLICATION FOVIEW FORM
forthe
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Project Name: Lexington Quarry DEMLR Permit 29-13 County: Davidson Applicant's Email:
Jack.Garvey(d)harson. biz
PERMIT ACTION TYPE:
YES NO Date Commencing
r( r(
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? t r t 1992
Latitude: 35.7772 Longitude:-80.2384
Please return comments to (at DEMLR CO): Judy Wenner
Comments due by: January 10, 2014
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWR
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water quality?
Comments:
WatershedlStream Name & Classification:
DWR Compliance Status of Mine:
Does this mine (or previous owner) have DWR back fees to pay? If yes, amount:
Is this mine an active permit in BIMS?
YES NO
401 Wetland Gert. required?
r r'
t
401 Wetland Cent. existing?
r ( Permit n
r t
Does _D•_WRRO]have enough information to
determine tf a 401 cernficatlon Is reguvedB _
r (
I
Does DWR RO suspect or know of nearbywetlands
to the site?
u,
Rig,
... .•... v .b ^.. �•�
a ....'S .._
.. '.,,- ,.5. _.w �.: ' n.� .''
Rnu Ccntnmhcr 9Otn

Print this form to PDF Return POF of this torn to DEMLR CO by email cc OEMIR RO, DWR SPU Send a copy to the percrid ee.
�Apy ' s%AOff6lte�
fir Q} ,� wt
1 ei ^$ Y s r
,�^
Stream Determination Needed?
r c
r
Stream Determination Completeci
Does DWR RO need a statement that no
wetlandsistreams are disturbed
rf
rr
for this project from applicant?
Btiffer Determination
Needed2
Buffer Determination Completed?
r!
rr
„Recycle system'.permdexistirig? ,
r(Permit#A
ym
,.,
,:'rr—,
New Recycle System permit required?"
Enough information to determine?
—
Non=.discharge permitexisting? '
tPermit # J
n
Does this applicant need to contact the
regional of Central DWR Office to
r c
I
determine if a State Stormwater Permit is
needed?
rf Unknown.
Will wastewaters discharge to HQW waters
r r
r (7Q10
Permittee
with a 7010=0? ""
Flow:
must
determine.
IN e "
rr Has Violation •'
""
f O&M�'Regmrements
r4I t
a
HQW/7Q10 Concerns
, y%
-
rl Paygback fees`or�renew
r `I. '.
Does�DWRrequne1DEMLRtoholdthe arr
epermiti(e g so)DWR can review tt f6i1her orI
DWR(permitr
+ �1,y
because DWRIreguires more information)?
lrr Other
' [ '
describe the^reason to"
A
fPlease
hold.ythe,permit
-.
*- t !
ROFcontact T
,
"m
tr(Hold•Until
t h r..
r
Mine must wait to dewater until an O&M plan is
r (
r r
approved?
—
"To obtain 7Q10 flows, perniffees must contact the DWR StormwaterPenniffing Unit. If DWR does not have a flaw estimate far a
specific stream, permittees will be asked to obtain one. Penniflees should contact J. Curtis Weaver at the USGS: 919-571-4043, for
more information on obtaining a 7010 flow. USGS will not determine a 7010 flow for tidally influenced water bodies.
"' If there is not enough information to oive a complete answer. write in the soace crowded what von will need to answer this question
completely. If you require DEMLR to hold the permit until lurthernotice indicate that in the question below.
P,,.c,..,m,,.w, vmn

Print this tom to PDF Retum PDF of this form to DEMLR CO by email. cc DEMLR RO, DW SPU. Send a copy to the permittee.
Reviewed by: ® A
DWR RO Surface Water:_ Regional Office: Date:
RO Aquifer Protection Section: Regional Office: Date:
Rov ROnIPmhpr 9M0

December 16, 2013
Ms. Judy Wenner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
DEHNR — Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
O.O
000
'30 Wansion
NEIDELBERGCEMENTGroup
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
South Region
North Carolina Territory Office
2101 Gateway Centre Bli Suite 100
Mordwile. INC 27560-9626
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
vn+w_hansorr.core
cEc i d ta)3
Subject: Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC — Lexington Quarry
NC Mine Permit No. 29-13
10-year Mine Permit Renewal Application
Dear Ms, Judy Wenner:
Hanson Aggregates is hereby requesting renewal of the above referenced mine permit
for a period of ten years. Please find the enclosed following documents:
1 (one) original mine application and 4 (four) copies
1 (one) original set of calculations and 4 (four) copies
1 (one) original set of mine plans and 4 (four) copies
1 (one) Check No. 21141891 for $1000.00 mine pennit renewal processing fee
This renewal only covers acreage under the existing mine permit; there Is no additional
acreage to be affected by mining. Since the permitted Basins have not been installed,
our contracted engineer, Tyrus Clayton, has re -designed the Basins; calculations are
attached.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at our
Morrisville office: [phone], and you may also contact our contracted engineer,
Tyrus Clayton: [phone].
Sincerely,
Jack arvey, Environmental Manager
Enclosures:
cc: Toby Lee, NC Operations Manager
C. Tyrus Clayton, Jr., PE

{
NORTH CAROLINA
MINING PERMIT APPd.ICATION
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of :Land Resources
Land Quality Section
161.2 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
Revised: January 30, 2009
Mine Permit Renewal Application
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
Lexington Quarry, NC Mine Permit No. 29-13
Lexington, Davidson County
WIN

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine Lexington Quarry County Davidson
River Basin Yadkin - Pec Dee Latitude (dd.mnr.ss) 350- 46'- 30" Longitude (dd.mmss) -800- 155- 00"
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson Acgregates Southeast, LLC.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 2101 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Physical
4. Mine-Offiee Address NC Hiehwav #S (An office has not been constructed on this site.)
Lexington. NC 27292 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Toby Lee
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature Date December 16, 2013
Print Name Chris Ward
Title VP/GM, Hanson Aggregates Southeast. LLC
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that con esponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application fora permit within 60 daysof receipt of❑
complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
-1-

u NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your raining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
1. a. If this is an application fora NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: Acres
leased: Property owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing pennit: Mining Permit No.: 29-13 Total
permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon): 158
c. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining pennit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: Total permitted acreage:
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes_ No . If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage that
tlhe "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Y c s No . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must ,complete all of Section I,. of this application form
entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of' this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes No (if no, a "minor
modification" fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). Ifs yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to
be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
d. If this is an application for "TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage.covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permittcd acreage:
■ SEETHE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PA11) FORTH E REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Mctadionte
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & 'Truck X Shovel & 'Truck X
Dragline & "Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
-2-

s
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 300'
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
Natural Ground Level
b. 1---xpceted average depth of mine (feet) 300'
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes No N
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted?
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10 Ycars
B. MAPS
1. Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six (6) copies of a 7.5 minute quadrangle
and a county highway map. 'These maps, in addition to six (6) copies of all mine maps and reclamation
maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5 minute quadrangles may be obtained from.-
N.C. Geological Survey
NCDCNR
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
-3-

i
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must he clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits can
only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps must be
of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, at a
minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights-of=way.
b. Existing or proposed pennit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits ofelcaring and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants maybe described as to location and
distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater bonds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
I. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
in. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Nantes of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of -land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of
the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of
the mining pen -nit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adioining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway; creek, stream, river, or
other watercourse; railroad track; or utility or other public right-of-way; if an adjoining tract is
owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of
record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of.the mining permit boundary, must
be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel or
less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
l . Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Nantc and title of person preparing map
Map scales should inset the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
5004- Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above iteins)
-4-

A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTEDACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
8
Stockpiles
3
Wastepiles
10
Processing Area/Haut Roads
15
Mine Excavation
30
Other
Total AtTected Acreage
66
NOTE: IN ADDITION TOTHE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN
THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE A'OTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE ➢I INE MAPS.
161111

0
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and r-elerence the
sequence to the mare map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
Please see the previously approved "Detailed Mining Sequence" at tlhe back of this mine penult application.
The sequence of the mine lhas not changed since the previous submittal.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offslte sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion cowrol,for mine
el-cavation(v), waste piles, accesslinine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of installation
and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locale and label all sediment and erosion control measures
on the mine map(s) and provide typical ei-oss-sect oiislcorrsti'uctiori details of cacti measure. Engineering
designs and calculations shall be required when needed to justify the adequacy of any proposed measures.
During the life of the quarry, any cleared land not being used in the mining operation will be seeded for
pasture. Within the affected area of the mine site, a series ofdiversion ditches (grass -lined or rip -rapped) will
be constructed and maintained to channel all run-off water to settling ponds or sediment basins prior to its
release into any stream.
The sequence of control structure construction is stated in the "Detailed Mining Sequence" refcreneed above.
This previously approved document can be found at the back of this application. This information has not
changed since the last submittal.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
The cruslicd stone production process requires water for washing the sized stone products at the wash
screen to remove dust and fines for the eventual use in asphalt and ready mix concrete. The water is
recycled through a closed circuit process water settling pond system. Wash water from the plant is
collected and delivered to tile primary pond, where most of the fines arc removed by simply settling out of
suspension. The water then flows to the secondary pond where settling of additional finer particles takes
place. The secondary pond also serves as a fresh water pond, and the clean water is punhpcd back to the
plant for re -use in the stone washing process. Due to loss to evaporation from the ponds and loss into the
stone products, the water balance is periodically restored by supplementing with groundwater pumped
from the quarry as part of the dewatcring process.
Water is also used for (lust control at the facility. Water is used at the processing plants by introduction
through sprays at crushers and at conveyor transfer points to control dust emissions. It is also used in the
water truck to control dust emanating from (haul roads, stockpiles, and the shot rock pile in the pit. Water
used in dust suppression is usually pulled either from the quarry dewatcring or fi-om the secondary
settling/fresh water pond.
At the present time, no chemicals are planned in any of these processes; however, It may be necessary to
use DWQ approved flocculants in the recycle system to help achieve a cleaner source of water for the
plant washing and dust control. It may also become necessary to use chemicals such as calcium chloride
or organic surfactants on the haul roads and crusting agents on the stone product stockpiles.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge to
the waters ofthe State? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the mature of the discharge and
locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of slabilization) on your urine limp(,).
Water discharged will consist of small amounts of localized ground water. encountered during pit
excavation and stormwater run-off. Water from pit dewatcring requires only minimal treatment at times to
make it acceptable for discharging. To insure high quality discharge at all times, it will pass through a
scttling pond prior discharging. Storinwater will be suitable treated using BMPs such as sediment traps
and basins prior discharge.

0 o
We currently may operate under the NPDES COC No. NCG020204 General Permit that covers the
discharge of excess groundwater fi-om the quarry dewatering process, as well as any excess water fi-oin
our closed circuit settling pond system. The discharge water passes through a separate settling pond prior
to being discharged. The NPDES Permit also covers stormwater front the mine sites through multiple
point source discharge points.
c. Will any ]fart of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
Yes X No . If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X
No if yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated
withdrawal rate in gallons per day: Locate all existing wells as the mire map(s) that lie
within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any conclusions or statements
made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and current water withdrawal rates
Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water system or private wells.
From analysis of the core retrieved from exploratory drilling, the metadiorite appears to have very little
primary permeability. The only means in which water may be transported will be through secondary
permeability (i.e. joints, fractures, shears, etc.); however, from core analysis, RQD values are in the 85`%o
to 95%, range below the weathered rock interface, and these joints and shears do not appear to be
interconnected. The surfaces of the fractures and joints show very little evidence of mineralized coatings
as a result of water transportation.
Removal ofthe overburden has very little effcct oil shallow wells In the area since the pits, lor the most
part, sit on a topographic high and very little recharge area for shallow wells will be disturbed. The
overburden materials in the pit areas are silts, clays, and sand which inhibit groundwater migration.
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for Or
obtained the appropriate water quality pennit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) fi-om the
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to register water
use with the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day
and needs a capacity use pernlit from the Division of Water Resources if the operation lies in a capacity
use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
The Lexington Quarry may operate under NPDES COC No. NCG020124 General Permit. Water
withdrawals are reported annually by April I" to the Division of' Water Resources.
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions?
Yes X No If' yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air
quality permit issued by the Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
NC Air Permit No. 07417R07, issued by NCDENR DAQ, is In place for quarrying. A complete
system of water sprays are in place at all crushers and conveyor transfer points to control particulate
emissions from these sources.
b. How will dust fi-om stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
A water truck would be used to wet the haul roads, muck piles, and stockpiles as needed to control
fugitive emissions from these sources.
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-of-
way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
withiii the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions. Note
that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary
or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a wider buffer
-7-

0 •
may be needed depending oil site conditions. Show all bllffel' locations c111d 1v1dtIT.S On the 1}r111L'
mar)(v).
It is anticipated that a minimum 50 foot undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any mining
activity and existing property line or highway right of way. This site is completely wooded, and it is
Hanson's intent to maintain as much of this natural area as possible in passive buffer area. This does
not in any way inhibit Hanson's right to use the property outside the 50-foot Undisturbed Buffer
Zone.
Since the entire site is wooded, Hanson is making effortas to preserve the natural areas as much as
possible. The buffer around the property lines will be maintained by trees instead Of visual berms to
screen the operation from the neighbors.
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet may
be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within the
mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all buffer
locations and iviclihs oil the mine map(s).
A 50' wide buffer will be maintained between all wetlands and natural watercourses located on the
site. See attached maps.
G. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to I vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
111irlilnUr1 3 horizontal to I vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
To prevent landslides and/or slope failure adjacent to adjoining properties, cut slopes will be graded
no steeper than 1-1/2 to 1, and fill slopes will be graded no steeper than 2: I, and proper compaction
procedures will be utilized. All slopes will be stabilized by seeding as soon as possible after grading
has been completed. Necessary erosion controls will be used to prevent slope failure by concentrated
stormwater runoff. As previously stated in 5a, buffer zones ot'varying widths will be maintained in
areas of existing vegetation, and no mining will occur within 50-feet of existing property lines.
b. Provide a cross-section on the urine lnap(v) for all.Jill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburclell
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation ofany benches
and/or slope drains (with szrpporling design iriforinalion) if needed, and the method of final
stabilization.
See attached mine plans for generalized locations. For more specific details, sec previously
approved plans and details.
c. In cxcavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes including
specifications for benching and sloping. Cross-.sections.fol- all cut slopes must be provided oil the
mine map(s).z
The maximum slope within the pit excavations will be 1-1 /2 to I in unconsolidated overburden with
a I5-foot wide bench every 35-feet and a 25-foot bench at the overburden / rock interface.
d. In harclrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -sections
of the !nine excavation clearl), noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all Safely benches and
mine benches, and the exI.)ected maximum depth of the excavation.

•
0
The expected slope will be to I with a 15-11 bench every 35-ft of'vertical depth. This slope has
been adequate throughout the history of other Hanson sites since the deposits are relatively uniform
and do not have a tendency to slide. It is typical of our operations currently to leave a 15' wide safety
bench for every 35' of vertical height.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building fi-om any mime excavation. Locale all such
structures air the mine mcrp if they are within 300 feet of airy proposed excavation.
To prevent any physical hazards to neighboring houses, no mining will be conducted within 800-feet ofany
dwelling or building. Likewise, no mining activities will occur within 900-feet ofKimberly Drive or within
600-feet of Interstate 85.
Prior to quarrying, a pre -blast survey will be conducted in and around neighboring homes to determine the
pre-existing structural conditions of those dwellings. Once quarrying begins, all quarry blasts will be
monitored with a seismograph to insure that peak particle velocities and over -pressures are within local,
state, and federal guidelines.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the urine map(s).
During the life of the quarry, barricades of either oversize rocks or concrete barriers will be used and
relocated as the pit is being developed. Access to the properly itself is restricted by gates that are locked
when the quarry is not in operation.
These barricades will be established prior commencement of mining operations and during the stripping of
the pit before the stripping depth exceeds 10 vertical feet.
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes No X I -low will acid water pollution
from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
Acid water is not expected, but mine dewatering analytical testing will tell us where are signs of acid water
pollution. Hanson will treat as necessary to neutralize the water should tests warrant such treatment.
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or otlier vegetation, building beans or other
measures. Show fire location of all visual screening oil the mine maps) and provide cross -sections
through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for Tree plantings,
Since the entire site is is completely wooded with hilly terrain, no visual berms will be necessary.
Hanson will maintain a well -screened vegetative buffer, which will keep the entire operation
from public view.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
There are no publicly owned parks, forest or recreation areas adjacent to the property.
11. Will explosives be used? Yes X No . If yes, specify the tyl)cs of explosive(s) and
describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring property
From flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations. Depending on the mire's location to nearby
structures, more detailed technical information may be required on the blasting program (such as a third -
party blasting study). Locate the nearest of . fvite occupied swucture(s) to the proposed excctvcrtiolz(v) on the
urine map and indicate its approximate distance to 1he proposed excavation.
IM!

0 0
Ensign 131ckiord or comparable nonel blast initiation systern is used to inadvertent blast initiation especially
during possible thunderstorms. An electronic initiation system may be substituted for the novel system if it
is deemed a better overall systern. Weather conditions are monitored continuously before, during, and aflcr
loading of each shot to insure that the shot will not be Initialed under adverse weather Conditions that might
cause blast emissions to drift in an unacceptable direction or might prevent proper venting oftlie blast wave
away from adjoining properties. ANFO premixed powder is used in dry holes. A cap -sensitive high
explosive emulsion is used for wet holes and initiation of the ANFO.
Since blasting Is an integral part of this operation, each blast is monitored with a seismograph to insure that
peak particle velocities and peak over pressures are within the limits established by local, stale, and federal
authorities. A recording of each blast will be made on magnetic tape and will be sent to a third party
consultant for analysis using the Response Spectrum Velocity Profile (RSVP).
Prior to any blasting on site for production purposes, a preblast survey of all structures within 1000-feet of
the pit will be conducted, such as Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc. During the survey, Vibra-"Tech will attempt to
allay some of the public's concerns regarding present-day blasting technique.
As an additional precaution, some preliminary seismic studies will be conducted on -site to cicternline the
preferred direction of blasting and pit development to further lessen the possibility of' excessive peak
particle velocities during the actual mining conditions.
12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No
I f yes, desci-ibe these mate'i- als, how they will be slot-ed and method of containment in case of s13ill. Indicate
the location(y) of all slot -age facilities on the mine map(S),
Fuel tanks will be enclosed in an above -ground steel secondary containment. All other oils, greases, and
fluids will also be stored in secondary containment. Used oil will be collected from equipment and picked
up for off'site recycling by properly certified contractors. Empty oil and grease barrels will be returned to the
supplies- or cleaned and placed into the metal scrap biil for offsite recycling. An approved dealer will handle
any solvents. All employees are trained on a regular basis in the proper handling of petroleum products,
managing and cleaning of spills, and proper disposal of rags, absorbent materials, and any contaminated
soils.
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used In reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method ofrestoration or establishment
of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. This
iiifoi-malion must be illusti-algid on a i-eclamalion mal) and must coi-i"C'.Spoild directly with the iiifai-malion
pi-ovided on the mine map(s). In addition, design biformatioll, including typical cross -sections, of any
permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the location(v) ofall permanent
channels must be indicated on the i-eclamation map.
Reclamation of disturbed area will be an integral part of the active quarrying operations. As areas are
disturbed, re -vegetation will occur in accordance with the previously approved "Reclamation Plan". Please
refer to the initial reclamation plan found on RP-1 ofthe submitted mine maps.
The plant site, shop, and yard will be graded and re -vegetated according to the "Rc-vegetation Plan". The
primary and secondary settling ponds will be filled in, graded, followed by seeding and mulching.
The quarry pit itselfwill be allowed to fill with groundwater and rain water and can be used to provide water
storage and recreation for the local area.
-10-

0 0
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes X No
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(5) of ivater on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed body(() of water. The minimum water depth must beat least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site. Will the body(s) of water be stocked with
fish? Yes No X . If yes, specify species.
it is Hanson's intent to convert the quarry into a fresh water lake upon cessation of mining activities.
Although the body of water will not be stocked with fish, it is anticipated that a fish population will develop
within a few years due to natural process offish egg transportation. A large percentage of the mining area
will be left as impounded water. In sonic areas, overburden will be backfilled to an elevation several feet
above the water table, and seeded according to schedule.
See attached drawings for specific details and cross sections.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be Icft. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation mat).
As a safety precaution, a 15-toot wide safety bench will be left for each 35-feet of bench height in all final
rock slopes. Additionally, a permanent fence will be erected around the completed quarries to prevent
unauthorized entry, and danger signs will be posted at regular intervals along the fence to warn folks of the
open pits.
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of. overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine waste
areas, Including specifications for benching and sloping. l{tttal cross -sections acid locations forstich ai"cas
must be provided on the reclamation map.
As overburden is placed in designated areas, it is spread and compacted by dozer and haul units. Slopes in
waste areas will be graded 2:1 or flatter and vegetated as soon as possible to prevent erosion. Erosion control
measures and runoll' conveyances will be established as the wastepile develops and then maintained
throughout the process until final reclamation is achieved. Drainage on top of the waste areas will be
established to prevent pooling and stagnation of' water and to control runoff. Final reclamation of waste
areas will include final top and slope dressing as required followed by seeding in accordance with the
attached re -vegetation plan. Please see attached drawings for specific detail.
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
Reclamation in these areas will occur as follows. First, the product stockpiles will be sold down. Then the
processing plants will be dismantled and removed from the site. Any remaining piles, waste piles, and
areas graded for plant layout and operation (including ramps to the primary stations) will be graded 2:1
maximum slope but generally 3:1 or flatter. Finally, these areas will be scarified and seeded according to
the rc-vegetation plan. Any site access roads not utilized in the end use development plan will be treated
in the same manner.
Any erosion control structures in these areas to be incorporated into the end use development of the site
will be cleaned out and Icft in good working condition.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No Ifyes,
identify such roadways on the reclamation !flap and provide details on permanent ditch line staPization.
Main paved roads into the existing stone processing area will remain for access and future development
purposes. The road through the existing plant site to the former plant area will remain and will be graded,
including side drainage ditches, and stabilized with rock.
-11-

® 0
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal,junk machinery, cables, or other
such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971). No off -site
#,yenerated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written approval from the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and either the Division of
Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit has been issued by DWM
for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application. All temporary awl permanent
refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated onthe mine nrap(S) and reclamationmap, along with alis!
of hems to be disposed in said areas,
As previously approved, temporary scrap and used equipment storage areas have been developed at this site.
The scrap material and used equipment which accumulate as a result of mining and processing activities are
stored in these areas until sold to an independent recycling contractor. No process waste products other than
inert lines are disposed of at this site.
A scrap bin is maintained on site for disposal by recycling of small metal scrap. Tires arc recycled through
the various tire suppliers.
Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for year-round seedinl;, including the time of seeding and the amount and type
of' seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for permanent revegetation and, if necessary, temporary revegetation. Rcvegetation utilizing
only tree plantings is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department o1' Environment and
Natural Resources;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, specialists
and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest Resources at
North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
c. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources;
f. N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
g. N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation,-
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre):
2000 lb/ac applied in spring. Application rate to be adjusted based oil soil sampling results.
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre):
As required use of 10- l 0-10 at 500 lb/ax. Land application of animal waster (chicken litter) used when
available.
SEED -TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Final Cover: Sercea Lespedcza (60%) Berntiuda (40%) or Sencea or Bermuda depending on area
being planted. (60-80 Ib/ac depending on seed type)
Temporary Cover: Small grain or rye in fall/winter at 15- lb/ac. Millet in spring/sununcr at 200
lb/ac.
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF ANCHORING:
Clean straw or hay a 2 tons/acre
-12-

Tack with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./ 1000 square foot, or other lucking agent approved by
Owner.
OTHER VELETA"LIVE COVERS —TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acrc, trecs/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature Date
Print Name
Title
Agency
-13-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
Ae•161lowing bond calculation wot-ltsheet is to be used to establish an appr•opt-iate bond (based upon a t-ange
of S500 to S5,000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approved by the
Deparlfnclrl to be affected during the life ofthe mining permit. Please inset-! the approximate acrecrgfor each
aspect o the mining operation that Corr intend to at
fect dw-iniz the life o this mining, permit in addition Tease
rnsel-t the aRpm1viale reclamation cost/acre a,- each cate or, t-om the Schedule of Reclamation Costs
provided with this annlication form) OR you can defer to the Denat-tment to calculate vow- bond Tot- you based
A security bond has been posted by Hanson Aggregates Southeast, 1_,I C pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54.
F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "Notice" form, or a facsimiie tlhercof, attached to this application must be sent certified or registered mail
to:
Since this renewal does not involve expanding the existing permit boundaries, adjoining landowner
notifications are not required
-14-

0 s
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as
may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S. 74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLICANT:
Signature:
Print Name: C. Wayne McDonald
('Title, if applicable)
Company Windsor Investmcrits of' NC, LLC
(If applicable)
Address: P.O. Box 5094
High Point, NC 27262
Telephone: _ [phone]
Date Signed:
Signature:*
Print Name: Chris Ward
Title: Vice President/General Manager
Company: Hanson Aggrcgatcs Southeast, LLC
Mine Name: 1-lanson Agyregates - Lexington Quarry
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed:
*Signature must be the saine as the individual who signed Page l of this application.
One oril•inal and five (5) copies of the completed application, six (6) conies of all location mans. mine mans
and reclamation maps, and the appropriate processing fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check
or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be
sent to the Land Ouality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application
form.
Inquiries regarding the status of tlic review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-15-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
MINING FEE SCHEDULE Manson Aggregates — Lexington Quarry Mine Permit Renewal Application
A nonrefundable permit application processing fee when filing for a new mining permit, a major permit modification or a renewal
permit is required as follows:
0-25 acres 264-acres
New Permit Applications $3,750.00 $5,000.00
Permit Modifications $750.00 $1,000.00
Permit Renewals $750.00 $1,000.00
Transfers/Minor Modifications* $100.00 $100.00
x A nonrefundable $100.110 permit application processing fee is required for minor permit modifications. Minor permit modifications include ovvncrship Irausfcra,
name changes, bond substitutions and permit renewals where the mice is inactive and fully stabilized. A Minor permit mudificalion also includes lands added to a
permitted area, outside of the Minimum permit buffer zone requirements, %%'here uo plans for minim; relaled disturbance oflheadded lands hove been approved. All
other changes are considered major perrnil mndiflca6011%.
Acres for new permits and renewal permits means the total acreage at the silt. Acres for major modification of permits means that area of land affected by the
nrodifrcaliou within the permillcd rninc area, or am' additional land 111a1 is to he disturhed and added to an existing permitted area, or both.
Make checks payable to: NCDENR-Land Quality
1620 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-16I2
-16-

�( Lehigh Hanson Lehigh Hansqq��Inc. Address inquiries to the accounts payable customer response line at:
300 E. JohN�penter Frwy E-Mail: Ih_vendorsupportQleft�nson.com
a`I "r""`"n n Suite 1645 V
Irving, TX 75062
.eVe"nGw,Nenie"�;s " "�yeador Num6_a'rApr &WAi7cfie$k DI fMcd"iIX NTmtTerm,
NCDENR-LAND QUALITY 1 1607576 09282013 21147691
IiNOR IIDake"
K'-`
. -la4olc'e"Numb6r;
t ✓
`-
.. '$,'y,^, Remarks
"1 -`-r` r
ryj,Gioss Anioudk
WJOlamuM
NeCAinouhl
09/1912013
MCR09192013B
leainglon
1,000,00
1,000.00
Pagel of 1 TOTALS
$1,000.00OAO
r$1;Oo0
00
mansoI P+
DATE !-' '-CHECK 'NO
I,Lenign
arc,Wv
Bank !Am N.A.
GP
' ^
palls Tx 76201
6111
09/262013 21141891
Lehigh Hanson Inc
Yt
rt �,�
s k
i i�w Lµgr
t 300 E+Uohn Carpenter Frvry
sy
1$(_ §�
ultd
n Est ap
Suite"1645
. train g,TX 75062
-
+
AMOUNT
PAY ONETHOUSANDAND 00h00 »»••«»••'••«»•
ik_ rd
t'+,.
m
«• ••«•»••
Rs
S
..
3 100000 ", .9
r Y n
€
Void aher J80 days lKl
ti
_p`"+",v9
TO THE NCDENR-LAND QUALITY
. ORDER OF -.
AI.•/L..

LEXINGTON QUARRY
2013 MINE RENEWAL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
CALCULATIONS
Lexington, North Carolina
Mining Permit No. 92-13
December 2013
Owner
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, I.I.C.
2102 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27S60
919 380 2746
Prepared By: ;7 V.-
n
J6g, Clayton, Sr, PE, Inc. EIHI&ELOm menulEagiamaim
46 West Washington Street
Coats, North Carolina 27521
Phone: [phone]-Fm:910897-6767
Vices loca,rs! in Coaa and New Bern, NC
Licrnse/ovmncn
ne N C-257
D
CTC Project No. 191004

E
•
NARRATIVE
The Lexington Quarry has had an active mine permit for many years.
However, active mining has never occurred at this site and the erosion and
sediment control measures originally designed and approved have not
been installed. As part of the 2013 renewal application for the mine
permit, the sediment control devices, particularly the sediment basins have
been re -sized per the current accepted design standards.
The following calculations are for the sediment basins at this proposed
facility. As part of this revision, the sediment basins all now include a
skimmer dewatering device and the larger basins have been designed with
a riser/barrel principal spillway.
In addition, the revised details for this facility now depict a rock baffle
within the sediment basins to aid in longevity and clean out activities.
Lexington Quarry Mine Renewal December 2013
Revised Sediment Basin Calculations CTC # 191004

Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Clayton, Sr., P.E., Inc. Praect Lexington Quarry
CIYII t, ENVIRdNf1ENTAL EN4iNEERING
P�o`ect # 191004
RUNOFF CALCULATION SHEET Date: December 13, 2013
ay wl_F
Drainage Area:
3 acres
Disturbed Area:
2.1 acres
Coefficient, C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I:
5.48
6.97 in/hr
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x i x A
=0.4x5.48x3
0Ax8.97x3
0.4x7.6x3
Q2=
6.58 Qia=
8.36 025-
9.12 ft°lsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
= 0.4 x 6.97 x 2.1
Qlo= 5.85 ft°/sec
Drainage Area:
1.2 acres
Disturbed Area:
0.72 acres
Coefficient, C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years 25 years
Intensity, I:
5.48
6.97 in/hr 7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x I x A
=
0.4 x 5.48 x 1.2
0.4 x 6.97 x 1.2 0.4 x 7.6 x 1.2
02=
2.63 Q,o=
3.36 Q25= 3.65 W/sec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
= 0.4 x 6.97 x 0.72
010= 2.01 ft'/sec
SB-3
Drainage Area:
0.93 acres
Disturbed Area:
0.7 acres
Coefficient, C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years 25 years
Intensity, I:
5.48
6.97 In/hr 7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x I x A
=
0.4 x 5.48 x 0.93
0.4 x 6.97 x 0.9: 0.4 x 7.6 x 0.93
02=
2.04 Q,o=
2.59 Q25= 2.83 ft3/sec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
= 0.4 x 6.97 x 0.7
010= 1.95 ft'/sec

SB4
Drainage Area:
8.6 acres
Disturbed Area:
5.84 acres
Coefficient. C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, 1:
5,48
6.97 iNnr
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x l x A
=0.4
x 5,48 x 8.6
0.4 x 6.97 x 8.604 x 7.6 x 8.6
02=
18.85 Oro=
23.98 02s=
25.14 felsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area=
C x I x A
=0.4
x 6.97 x 5.84
Oro=
16.28 n3tsec
SB-5
Drainage Area: 3.3 eWes
Disturbed Area 2.7 acres
Coefficient, C: 0.4
Time of Concentration: 5 min
Frequency: 2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I: 5.48
6.97 11
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 5.48 x 3.3
04 x 697 x 3.3 0.4 x 7.6 x 3.3
0r 723 Oro=
9.20 tin=
10.03 ft'/sec
Runoff. Disturbed Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 6.97 x 2.7
01a= 7.53 ft3/sac
SB-6
Drainage Area:
3.75 acres
Disturbed Area:
1.04 acres
Coefficient, C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity. I:
5.48
0.97 irVhr
7.80
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x I x A
=C4x5.48x3.75
0.4x6.97x3.7:0.4x7.6x3.75
02=
8.22 Oro=
10.46 02s=
11.4 7t'lsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area=
C x I xA
=0.4
x 6.97 x 1.04
ore=
2.90 ff"aec

0 •
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
p,. Cl47yt017, Sr.. PIE_, Inc.
0crvn
Pfbect:
Lexington Quarry
a rev2aoeerxr Al rxe2xsra2xa
, Protect 4:
191004
RUNOFF CALCULATION SHEET
I Date:
December 13, 2013
_ By:
WLF
Drainage Area: 1.48 acres
Disturbed Area: 1.08 acres
coamcient, C: 0.4
Time of Concentration: 5 min
Frequency: 2 yeare
10 years 25 years
Intensity, I: 5.48
6.97 Infhr 7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area= C x I x A
=0.4x5.48x L48
0.4x6.97xl.4�0.4x7.6xl.48
027 3.24 Q1o=
4.13 Q25= 4.5 ftolsec
Runoff, Distorted Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 6.97 x 1.06
Q10= 2.96 fW/sec
Drainage Area: 16 acres
Disturbed Area: 15.8 acres
Ccetficlent, C: 0.4
Time of Concentration: 7 min
Frequency: 2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I: 5.D44
0.41 Whir
6.98
Runoff, Drainage Area= C x 1 %A
=0.4 x 5.D44 x 16
OAx 6A1 x 160.4 x6.98 x 16
Q2= 32.211 01o=
41.02 Q20=
44.67 felsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
= 0.4 x 6.41 x 15.8
010= 40.51 " ac
Drainage Area:
6.47 acres
Disturbed Area:
6.47 acres
Coefficient, C:
0.4
Time of Concentration:
5 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I:
5.48
6.97 in/hr
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x I x A
=0.4x5.48x6.47
0.4x6.97x6.40.4x7.6x6.47
02=
14.18 016=
18.04 02r
19.67 0'/5ec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 6.97 x 6.47
010= 18.04 W/sec

Hanson Aggregates Southeast
n, Sr., PE., Inc.
Pivect
Lexington Quarry
ENOINEENINO
- -
P'ro ecti#.
191004
RUNOFF CALCULATION SHEET
Date"s
December 13, 2913
By_
WLF
Drainage Area: 3.5 acres
Disturbed Area: 2.1 acres
Coefficient, C: 0A
Time of Concentration: 5 rrdn
Frequency: 2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I: 5.48
6.97 imhr
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 5.48 x 3.5
0.4 x 6.97 x 3.5 0.4 x 7.6 x 3.5
02= 7.67 Qio=
0.76 Q25=
10.64 9'lsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 8.97 x 2.1
Qro= 5.85 6°lsec
Ss-11
Drainage Area: 17.1 acres
Disturbed Area: 17.1 acres
Ccefficienl, G 0.4
Time of Concentration: 5 min
Frequency: 2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I: 5.48
6.97 in/hr
7.60
Runoff, Drainage Area= C x i x A
=0.4 x 6.48 x 17.1
0.4 x 6.97 x 17. 0.4 x 7.6 x 17.1
QI= 37.48 Qro=
47.07 Q2s=
51.98 WIsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area= C x I x A
=0.4 x 5.97x 17.1
Qro 47.67 0'/sec
Drainage Area:
22.3 acres
Disturbed Area:
15.7 acres
Coef dent, Q
0.4
Time of Concentration:
10 min
Frequency:
2 years
10 years
25 years
Intensity, I:
4.39
5.57 in/hr
6.05
Runoff, Drainage Area=
C x I x A
=0.4
x 4.39 x 22.3
0.4 x 5.57 x 22:0.4
x 6.05 x 22.3
Qr
30.16 Qm=
49.68 Qcs=
93.071f'lsec
Runoff, Disturbed Area=
C x I x A
=0.4
x 5.57 x 15.7
Qro°
34.98 Wfaec

a
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
>o CEayton, Sr., FE., Inc.
Proect
Lexi ton "Uarry
CNL FnvTNmnEENTAI FNND6ENEN0
Pro abp#'.
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN S8 1
DaGei
December 13, 2013
er
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Stung
10.year nmolf(Disturbed Area). Ch.: 6.66 113/sec
Disturbedarea: 2.1 some
Volume required= 1800 RE peracre disturbed area
=1800 x 2.1
= 3.780 R1
Surface was required = 325 ft3 perftlMec Ota
= 325 X 5,8548
1903 ft1
Surface devagon: 688
Bollom elevation: 685
Pending depth: 3 R
Side slope ralo: 2 h :1 v
Surface width: 31 a
Surface length. 62 R
Surface area = 31 x 62 LAV = 2.00
= 1922 fe ADEQUATE
Bottom width: 19
Bottom 10110: 50
Bottom was = 19 x 60 =
950 fts
Pending volume= (1922 +950) f2 x 3 -393.6
= SM14 Ra ADEQUATE
Spillway Design
26-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Qrs: 9.12 f0mis
Sallvray Crest Elov.: 688.0
Spillway Width: 3.0 R
Side Slope Rate: 3.0 h : 1v
Water Depth: 0 24
Area, A: 0.89
Wetted Perimeter 452R
Hytlreuilo Radius. R: 0.196 ft
Roughness CoaRioient m 0.015
Shape. S'. BABB loft
Velocity. V=1.49/mi a Wa: 10.60 Itlsec
Spillway Capecily=VVA: 9A6 QE/sec
Capacity Required: 9.12 R3/sec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation: 669.5
Stdmreer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 3,914 83
Max Dewatering Time: 72 hrs
Minimum Skimmer Ste: 1.5 in
Factor: 28M R3
OOOce Ares = 391412660 =
1.36 in'
Office Diameter= 1.32 in
Baffle Sting
Height: 3 R
Side elope retlo: 2h :1v
Top Width: 2 It
Base Width = 4 x 3 +2
= 14 R
Top Arne = 2 x 31
62 fix
Base Area = 14 x 19
266 1x
Volume = (62+288)12 x 3
492 R3
Rork Volume = 0.8 x 492
= 393.6 113

s
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
ro Cl4yt On, Sr., PE., Inc.
Pro'ecli
Lexington Quarty
CNll 9 '1FamRHIAE ENCINEENIXC
Pro'ecM1M:
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 2
Deteiece
Dmber 13, 2013
By
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sizing
10-year runt (DisWNed Area). Ora: 201 feiw
Dislurbed area: 0.72 acres
Volume required = 1800 ft3 Persona disturbed area
= 1800 X 0.72
= 1,296 fta
Sudace area required =
325 f13 per fa/sec Div
=
325 X 2 00736
=
652 ft
Surface elevation:
693
Bottom elevation:
690
Pondhg depth:
3 ft
Side slope read
2 h : 1 v
Surface Wash
20 It
Surface length:
40 ft
Surface area =20x
40 WV= 200
=
B00 al ADEQUATE
Bottomvbdlh:
8
Bottom length:
28
Bottam area =
8 x 28 =
224 It'
Pending volume =
(800 a 224) /2 x 3 -162.4
=
1A54 ft3 ADEQUATE
Spillway Design
25-Year Runoff (Drainege Area), On: 3.65 fl'/sec
Spillway Crest Elev.: W3U
Spillway Width: 20 fl
Side Slope Rate: 3.0 h: 1v
Water Depth: 0.18
Ame. A: 0.46
Welled Perimeter 3.14 R
Hydraulic Radius. R: 0.146 It
Roughness Coef licienl, m. CIA15
Slope, S: 0.090 NR
Velocity, V=1.49/nxRaaxSra: 8.20 fdw
Spillway Capacity=VxA,: 3.75 leisec
Capadly Required: 3.65 Ouse
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Tap at Embankment Elevation- 694.5
Skimmer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 1,354 ft'
Max. Dowel Time: 72 has
Minimum Skimmer Size: 1.5 in
Factor. 2880 fl3
Orifice Area = 135412880 =
0.47 Ina
Dories Diameter= 0 n in
Bat0e Sizing
height: 3 d
Side slope recto: 2h : 1v
Top Width: 2 fl
Base Width = 4 x 3 s 2
14ft
Top Area = 2 x 20
= 40 1lt
Base Area = 14 x 8
112 ft°
Volume=(40H12)/2x3
228 ft3
Rock Volume = 0.8 x 228
182.4 ft'

10 Clayton, Sr.,P.E., Inc.
P.r1i- '
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Quarry
CNTL 6 FNVIRMRI(NTAL FXPiNF FPINp
-
Pro" -#;
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 3
bate:
December 13. zD13
B,:
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin swing
10-year rune# (Disturbed Area), O10: 1.95 04Iseo
Disturbed area: 0.7 sacs
Volume reculred = 1 B00 fla per acre disturbed area
= 1800 X 0.7
= 1.260 ft'
Surface area required =
325 Wiper Whilic Ole
=325X
1.9516
=
634 0r
Surfamelevatien:
692
Bottomelevafion:
6139
Ponding depth:
3 ft
Side slope ratio:
2 h : 1 v
Surface width:
19 0
Surface length:
4 0
Surface area =19XQ
UW= 2.11
=
Top f ADEQUATE
Bottom wdth:
7
Botlom length:
28
Bottom area =
7 x 28 =
196 fe
Pending volume =
(760 4 19B) 2 x 3 .10.2
=
12710' ADEQUATE
Spillway Del
26-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Orr' 2.W felsec
Spillway Crest Elev.: 692.0
Spillway Width: 20 It
Slde Slope Ratio: 3.0 h :1v
Water Depth: 0.15
Arco, A: 0.37
Wetted Perimeter. 2.95 ft
Hydraulic Radius, R: 0.125 ft
Roughness Coati n. 0.015
slope, s: 0,110 nxt
Velocity, V=1 491nxR"XS'e: 8.16 New
Spillway CapadlrVxA: 3.00 Wised
Capacity Required: 2.83 Owe
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Tap of Embankment Elevallan: 693.5
SMmmer Slztng
Maximum water volume: 1,271 It'
Max. De witarGg Time: 72 hrs
Minimum Skimmer Scre'. 1.5 In
Factor 2880 83
OrRca Area= 12711208D=
0.44 Inn
OniFim Diameter= 0.75 in
Baffle Sizing
H*ht: 3 ft
Side elope ratio2h : i v
Top Width: 2 0
Base Width = 4 x 3 + 2
= 14ft
Top Area=2x19
as fir
Base Area = ib x 7
98 ftr
Volume = (38+ 98)12 x 3
204 ft'
Rock Volume = 0.8 x 204
= 163.2 tt'

8
i
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Claon, Sr., P-E-, Inc.
y
Proei
Lexington Ouar
fbSl 4 rNtVIa0N1AN7Ai. FNOINEFNIN6
Pnoecl #i
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 4
Date:
Decemher13, zD13
B:
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sizing
10-year runoff (Disturbed Area). Qrc: 16.28111aec
Disturbed area: 5.84 acres
Volume required = 1800 f? per arse disturbed area
= 1800 X 5.84
= 10,5121t1
Surface area required = 325 W per Owc 0"
= 325 X 1628192
= 5292 flx
Surface elevallon: 61
Bottom elevation: 665
Pending depth: 2.5 In
Side slope ra le: 2 In : 1 v
Surface wait 50 0
Surface length: 106 R
Surface area = 50 x 106 L/W = 2.12
= WNW ADEQUATE
Bottom width. 40
Bottom length: 96
Bottom area = 40 x 96 =
3840 fls
Pending volume = (53D0+ 3840) r2 x 2.5 - 500
= 10,845 W ADEQUATE
Spillway Design
25-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Q25: 26.14 WIWIC
Splllwey Crest Elev.: 667.5
SpiWmy Width: 3.0 a
Side Slope Ratio: 3.0 h : 1 v
Water Depth: B45
Area, AI 196
Wetted Perimeter 585 R
Hydraulic Radius, R: 0.335 h
Sculptural Ceeffiidenl n: 0.015
Slope, S: O.OBO hilt
Vnbdty, V=I A9inxR laxS12. 13.50 f6mc
Spilkvay Cepady-Vsk: 2IL42 fts/mc
Capacity Required: 26.14 Oasis
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation: Sell
Skimmer Suring
Maximum wafer volume: 10,845 a'
Max. Dewatelirg Time: 72 hrs
Minimum Skimmer Size: 2.5 in
Faster: 3810 Or
Odfim Arm = IBM 131310 -
2.a5In'
Orifice Diameter= 1,90 In
BaIOe Skiing
Height: 2.5 B
Side slope ratio: 2h : 1v
Top W iath: 2 0
Bow Width =4x2.6 N2
= 12 0
Tog Area = 2 x 50
= 100 R2
Base Area a 12 x 40
48D I
Volumes(1 D = O i 480)12 x 2.5
Of 72S flz
Rock Volume = DA x 725
580 Ox

s
,o .Clayton, Sr., pE., I116
P 'ect:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Laxin ton Qua
czvn. wVxaamrs.xr ceozazzazuo
- -
Piro ect:#
181004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 5
gate!
Decamlxar13,2013
•ey:
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sizing
,,Uyear mroff (Disturbed Area). Oro: 7.53 R'/sec
Disturbed area: 2.7 acres
Volume required = 1800 ft1 per we disturbed area
= 1800 % 2.7
= 4,860 ff1
Sudace area required = 325 02 per ftalsac 010
= 325 % 7,5276
= 2446 fir
Surface elevation: 673
Bottom ebvadon: 670
Poring depth: 3 ft
Side slaps ra0o: 2 h :1 v
Surfers width: 35 it
Surface length: 79it
Surface area 35 x70 LM7= 2.00
2450 f2 ADEQUATE
Bottom width: 23
Bonorelerg0e 58
Bottom area = 23 x 68 =
1334 fl2
Poring valume = (2450 t 1334)/2 x 3- 470.4
5,206 ff ADEQUATE
Splllway0esign
25-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), On: 10.03 Wised
Spillway Crost Elev.: 673.0
SpliNM Width: 2.01t
Sine Slope Ratio: 3.0 h : 1v
Water Depth: B36
Area A: 1.11
Warned Perimeter: 4.28 it
Hydraulic Radius, R: 0,259 ft
Roughness; Coefficient, n: 0.015
Slope S: 0.055 fVff
Velocity, V=1.49/nxR2nxSun: 9.43 fesed
Spillway Capadly=VxA: 10.46 W/sec
Capacity Rack iced: 10a3 ftalsec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation: 674.5
Skimmer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 5,21IS to
Max Dewatemtg Time: 72 ors
Minimum Skimmer Sure 2 in
no orf0ce plate
cl aindown time 71 7 hours
Baffle String
height: 3 ft
Side slope ratio: 2h : 1v
Top Width: 2 ft
Sane Wirth = 4 x 3 a 2
14it
Top Area = 2 x 35
7D f
Base Area = 14 x 23
322 fe
Volume = (70 v 322) / 2 x 3
b88 r?
Rork Volume = on x 586
= 470A ft'

0
0
>o Clayton, Sr-, PE., Inc.
Proled:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexin on Qua
CIYII 1 EMVIDOIOENl4 EMBIXFEWMn
- -
�Proectlil;
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 6
_bate:
December 13, 2013
By
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Skiing
10-year mnpif (DisNNed Area), Orn: 2.90 WIsec
Disturbed area: 1.04 acres
Volume requited =1500ftper am disturbed area
=1BDox 1.D4
= 1 a72 83
Surface area required = 325 fe per S'/sec Oto
= 325 x 2 59952
942 fla
Surface shwaxon: 681.5
Bottom elevation 678
Ponding depth: 3.5 ft
Side slope ratio: 2 h :1 v
Surface width: 22 It
Sudece length: 44 it
Sudece area 22 x44 JW= 2.00
sea ft2 ADEQUATE
Boffin width: a
Bottom length: 30
Bottom area = 8 x 30 =
240 ft2
Ponding volume = (968 i 240) /2 x 3.5 - 240.E
= 1.873 ft3 ADEQUATE
SpIIMay Design
26-Vear Runoff (Drainage Area), Ods: 7 eD ft'iaec
Spillway Crest Elan.: 6815
Spillway Width: 2.0 ft
Side Slope Ratio: 3.0 h : 1v
Water Depth: 0.26
Area, A: 0.72
Welled Perimeter. 3.64 ft
Hydraulic Radius, R: alit fl
Roughness Coefficient. n: 0.015
Slaps. S: 0105 ftM
Velocity. V=1.491nxR3nxS'a: 10.89 fUsec
Spillway Capacity=VxA: 7.87 11131sec
Capacity Requi ad: 7.60 1131sec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min.Topof Embankment Elevedim 683.0
Skimmer Sizing
Maximum waler voume: 1,873 fe
Max. Dewatedng Time: 72 his
Minimum Skimmer Side: 1.5 in
Factor. 28N fl
Odce Am = 187312WO =
0.65 ins
Orifice Diameter= 0.911n
Bal0e Sizing
Height: 35 ft
Side elope ratio: 2h : tv
Top Width: 2 a
Base Width =4x 3.5 t2
16 It
Top Area = 2 x 22
44 02
Base Ama = 16 x 8
= 12842
Volume - (44. 128) / 2 x 3.5
= 301 I'
Rock Volume = 0.8 x 301
= 240.8 0'

10
>o Clayton, Sr., P.E., Ii
Proiect
Henson Aggregates Southeast
Lexin ton Qua
CNIL a FNVI W[NTAL G0414 rRING
-
PiD'ect-#i
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 7
Qate
December 13, 2013
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
13V
WILE
Basin Sizing
t 0-year nu ,aff (Disturbed Area), Did: 2.96 t'lsec
Disturbed area: 1 DIS acres
Volume required = 1800 Xa par acre disturbed ores
= 1800 % 1.06
= 1.908111
Surface area required = 325 ftz per Nslsee 010
= 325 %2.95528
= 960 ft°
Sudacaelevatlun', 687
Bottom elevation: 683
Pending depth: 4 X
Side slope ratio: 2 h: 1 v
Surface width: 22 I1
Surface length: "It
Surface area=22 x44 LAV 2.00
966e ADEQUATE
Bottom Maim: 6
Bottom length: 28
gammas area = 6 x 28 =
IN XI
Ponding volume = (966 + IM)12 x 4 - 243,2
= 2,029 Xs ADEQUATE
Balikesir Design
25-Year Runoff (Dreinage Area). QIs: 4.50 Whose
Spill" Cmst Elsv.:
687.0
Spillway Width:
2.0 1
Side Slope Rmb:
3.0 h : 1v
Water Depth:
020
Area, A:
0,52
Wanted Perimeter.
326 ft
Hydraulic Radius, R:
0.159It
Roughness Coeffiiaenl, n:
D.015
Sbpn, S:
0.110 fill
Velocity. V=1.49hsrRmxS1R:
9.62 fdxc
Spillway CapacllYVxA:
5.00 take;
Capacity Required:
4.50 falsec
Conclusion:
ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation:
668.5
Skimmer String
Maximum water volume:
2,029 Xs
Max. Dewatering Time:
72 his
Minimum Skimmer Size:
1.5 In
Factor:
2880 8'
Orifice Area = 2029128BO =
OJO In'
Ohre Diameter =
0.94 in
Bettie Sizing
Height: 4 A
Side slope ratio: 2h : lv
Top W Idth: 24
Base Widli
= 16 X
TOP Area = 2 x 22
44 ftz
Base Area = 1 B x 6
= too 8'
Volume = (444 teal)12 x 4
304 1i
Rock Volume = OB x 304
243.2 !3

0
0
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
30 lJlayton. Sr., PE_, Inc.
Pro ct:
Lexin on Quarry
crvn . ea�3reamraru raamrsaran
- -
Pinijectifl
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 0
Od(e(
December 13, 2013
bB :
WLF
RISER & BARREL SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sling
10-year runoff (Disturbed Area). Qm: 40.51 Oriole
Disturbed area: 15.8 acres
Volume required = iSDO n3 per acre disturbed area
= 1800x 15.8
= 28,440 83
Surface area required = 325 hz per 83ls Oro
= 325 x 110.5112
= 13,166 82
28620
Surface elevation: 654S
BeHle Sizing
Bottom elevaton: 649
Insight:
311
Pending depth: 5.5 0
Side slope ratio:
2h :1v
Top Width:
2 h
Bass Width =
4 x 3 a 2
=
14it
Ares m am er ine =
(2 s 14)12 x 3
Surface area: 13,308 fe
ADEQUATE =
24 fiz
Area at ends:
1 h2
Length:
70 it
Volume =
(24 * 1) x 70
Bollomarea: 25 fe
176083
Pending volume = (13306 + 25)12
x 5.5-1400 Rock Volume =0.8x 1750
= 35,260 h3
ADEQUATE =
1400 8
Spillway Design
Principal Spillway
Emergency Spili
Riser 8 barrel
TmWoldal channel, grass lining
Bottom Elevation: 649
25-year Runoff Drainage Area), Q3s.
"B7 WARING
Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 654.5
Spillway Crest Elev.:
655.5
Riser Diameter: 48 in
Solay Width:
6.0 ft
Riser Circumference: 13 it
Side Slope Ratio:
3.D h : Iv
Riser Capacity @ 1 h head: 3170 ft°/aec
Water Depth:
0.45
Bartel Diameter: 3o m
Area, A:
3.31
Bartel Area, A: 4.Mg flz
Waited Perimeter.
8.85 it
Wetted Paramount: 7.854 It
Hydraulic Radius, R:
0,374 ft
HydmMic Radius. R: 0.63 tt
Roughness Coeffiiciant. n:
rags
Roughness Coefficient, n: 8025
Sbpe, S:
O.070 M
Barrel Sbpe, S: 0.045 fill
Velocity, V=1.491nxR3nxS'o:
2.15 Nam
Velocity, V=1 49/nxRL3xStt`: 9.23 Name
Spillway Capi lY-VIrA:
7.10 Wiens
Barrel Capcify: 45.30 113isec
Capacity Restudied:
6.97 Whore
Principal Spillway Capcdy: 37.7083isec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
2-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Qz: 32.28 83lose
Min. Top of EmbankmentElevation:
657.0
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Skimmer Sizing
Ma4mum water volume: 35.26D h3
Max. Deerdtedng Time: 72 hm
Minimum Skimmer Size: 4 In
Factor. 4803 h3
Office Area =35250 f4 3=
T. in?
Orifice Diameter= 306 in

•
•
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
o Clayton, Sa., Y.E., InOF.P,
li
oec:
Lexington Quarry
C L LNYIRPNIIIMTR[ EPCINE FP[MO
Proec4#;
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 9
Date'
Decemt er 13, 2013
By-.I
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sizing
10.year rerg8 (Disturbed Area), Qro: 18.04 ft'lsec
Disturbed area: 6.47 acres
Volume required = 1800 fts per acre disM'bed area
= 1800 X 6.47
= 11,646 fls
Surface ease required = 3258e per flslsec Qro
325 X 18.03836
5862 I1x
Surface simian: 647.5
Bottom elevelan: 645
Ponding depth: 2.5 ft
Side slope ratio: 2 h : 1 v
Surface width 53 ft
Surface length: ill 1t
Surface area =53x111 LAN= 209
5083 file ADEQUATE
Bottom width: 43
Bodom length: 101
Bottom area = 43 x 101 =
4343 82
Panting volume = (5883+4343) a x 2.5- 622
= 12.161 fix ADEOUATE
Spillway Deelgn
25-Year RuoeR (Drainage Area), QIs: 1867 WIsec
Spillway Crest Elev.: 647.5
Spillway Width: 3.0 ft
Side Slope Ratio: 30 h: tv
Water Depth: C.Q
Area, A: 1.66
Wetted Petersen, 5.53 It
Hydraulic Radius. R: 0.304 ft
RougMess Coaflacienl m 0015
Slope, S: 0.070 lim
Velocity, V=lA91nxReraxS1a: 11.83 Nsec
Spillway Capachy=VxA: 19.87 Oxen:
Capacity Required: 19.67 631ama
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of EmbankmentElevation: 649.0
Skimmer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 12,161 83
Max. Dewaterirg Time: 72 him
Minimum Slimmer Size: 2.5 In
Factor 3810 fls
Odfare Area = 12161 13810 =
3.191na
Orifice Diameter= 2.021n
Basis Sizing
Height 25ft
Side saps ratio: 2h : Iv
Top Width: 2 ft
Base Width = 4 x 25 + 2
12ft
Top Area = 2 x 53
106 file
Base Area = 12 x 43
516 8e
Volume = (106+ 516) / 2 x 2.5
777.5 it
Rock Volume = 0.8 x 777.5
622 fls

•
O
,o Clayt oa, Sr., P. rme.
Project:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexin ton Quarry
CNn. MYTAKOMFNr AL EMYI,6E16M0
Project!#:
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SIB 10
Date:
December 13, 2013
By:
WLF
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
Basin Sizing
10-year mnoR (Disturbed Aree), 010: 5,85 806ec
Disturbed area: 2.1 saes
Volume required = 1 WO ft per sure disturbed area
= 1 WO x 2.1
= 3,780 fe
Surface area required = 3251f2 per ft3/sec Q,a
= 325 X 5.8648
= 1903 ft"
Surface elevation: 652
Bottom elevator: 648
donating depth: 4 It
Side a" ratio: 2 h : 1 v
Surface with: 28 ft
Surface length: 68 it
Surface area =28x68 LIN 2.43
= 1204 It, ADEQUATE
Bottom width: 12
Bottom kingth: 52
Sodom area = 12 x 52 =
624 f?
Ponding volume = (1904 + 624) 2 x 4 - 435.2
= 4,621 ft3 ADEQUATE
Spillway Deafen
25-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Qn: 10.64 t4Isec
Spillway Crest Elev.:
652.0
Spillway W iMh:
2.0 it
Side Sipe Ratio:
3.0 h : 1v
Water Depth:
0.30
Area, A:
0.87
Wetted Pedmels
3.90ft
Hydraulic Radius. R.
0.223 it
Roughness Coefficient, n:
0.015
Sipe, S:
0.125 6/6
Veidty, V=1.49/n# aoxSu`:
12.861Vaec
Spillway Capacity=VVA:
11.19 ft3feau
Capacity Required:
10 84 fte/aec
Conclusion:
ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation:
653.5
Sommer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 4.621 ffx
Max. Dowel Time: 72 him
Minimum Sommer Size: 1.5 in
no orifice plate
dnvn oyvn time 64 hours
Baffle Spring
Height: 4 ft
Side slope man: 2h : 1 v
Top Width: 2 0
Base Width = 4 x 4 * 2
18 It
Tap Area = 2 x 2S
= 56 R2
Base Area 18 x 12
= 215 111
Volume = (56 s 215) / 2 x 4
= 544 0°
Rod Volume = 0.8 x 544
= 435.2 83

E
•
r� + (il+DyLon, Sr-, PIE_, Inc
ON[L RVIRm06NTAL FROurl
RMect:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
Lexington Qua
----
'PiOectlMo
191004
SEDIMENT BASIN SB 11
RISER & BARREL SEDIMENT BASIN
,pate_:
December 13, 2013
B :
WLF
Basin Sizing
10-year runoff (Disturbed Ama), On: 47-67 O'Isac
Disturbed area: 17.1 sues
Volume requiod = 1S00 fP per am disturbed area
= 1800 X 17.1
= 30,780 fl3
Surface area required = 325 f13 per Blear. 010
= 325 X 47,6748
= 15.494 f[ 28620
Surface elevation: 678.5
Baffle Sizing
Bottom elevation: 672.5
Height: 3 ft
Pori depth: 6ft
Sldesloperalb: 2h: 1v
Tap Width: 2 It
Bass Width = 4 x 3 + 2
14 ft
Area et centedlne = (2 + 14)12 x 3
Surface area: 16,942 fP ADEQUATE
24 le
Area at ends: 1 ff'
Log%: 90 It
Volume = (24 + 1) x 90
Ballam area: 25 8°
2250 113
Ponding Volume =(16942+ 25)/2 x 6-1800
Rock Volume=0.8 x 2250
= 49,101 fl3 ADEQUATE
= low 8
Spilhvay Design
Principal SpllAvay
Riser & banal
Bottom Elevation: 6T2.5
Princlpal Spilhvay Crest Elevation 678.5
Riser Diameter. 48 in
Riser Circumference: 13 It
Riser Capacity @ 1 It head: 37.70 ft3/sec
Banal Diameter: 30 In
Barrel Area, A: 4.9D9 fla
Waited Perimeter: 7.854 R
Hydraulic Radius, R: 0.63 fl
Roughness Coefficient, n: 0.025
Banel Slope. S: 0.045 fVfl
Velocity, V=1.491nxR3axS12: 9.23 Nsec
Barrel Cmc ty: 45.30 ft lsec
Principal Spillway CepcRT.. 37.70 fl /sec
2-Veer RurroB (Drmage Area), Qn: 37.40 fl'rsec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Shimmer Slmre
Maximum vam volume: 49,101 ff3
Max. Devolving Time: 72 hrs
Minimum Skimmer Size: 4 in
Factor: 4803 ft3
Orifice Area= 49101 I4803=
10.22 it?
Orifice Diameter= 3.61 in
Emegency Spillwy
Trapaioldal channel, grass lining
25-Year Runoff (Drainage Area), Qzi:
61.98 Wiser.
Spillway Crest Elev.:
679.5
Spilhvay Width:
BA ft
Side Slope Ratio:
3 0 h : iv
Water Depth:
0.54
Area, A:
5.19
Welted Perimeter:
11.42 ft
Hydraulic Roche, R:
0,455 ft
Roughness Coefficient, in
0.075
Slope, S:
0.055 Mfl
Velocity. V=1 49InxRL3kSt2:
2.751Vaec
SPIIMaY CapaGty-Vxq:
14.28 f3lsec
Cap" Required:
14 28 fl3lsac
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation:
681.0

•
Basin Sizing
10-year mnoff (Disturbed Area), Orb 34.98 WIsec
Disturbed area: 157 acres
Volume required = 180D ft' par arse disturbed area
= 1B00 % 157
= 28,20 6'
Surfaco area required = 325 fie per ft leec Cie
= 325 % 34.9796
= 11,368 fl'
28620
Surface elevation: 690
Baffle Sizing
Bottom elevation: 684.5
Height: 3 it
Pending depth: 5.5it
Side slope redo: 2h: 1v
Top Width: 2 it
Base Width =4x3+2
= 14It
Area ai renterlina = (2 + 14)12 x 3
Surface area: 14,3331t' ADEQUATE
24 ft'
Area a1 made. 1 ff'
Length: 10D 0
Volume = (24+ 1) x 100
Bottom area: 25 it'
= 25M ft'
Pending volume a(14333+25)12 x 5.5-2000
Rock Volume=0.8 x25D0
= 37ASS ft' ADEQUATE
= 200D h'
Spnliaar Dealgn
Principal Spiikvay
Riser 8 hmral
Bottom Elevation:
684.5
Principal Spllhiay Crest Elevation
690
Riser Diameter:
54 In
Riser Ckcurnmence:
14 R
Riser Capacity @ 1 it head:
42.41 Its/sec
Bartel Diameter,
30 in
Barrel Area, A:
4.909 ffz
Waited Permitter:
1.854 h
Hydraulic Radius, R:
0.63 8
Roughness Coefficient. n:
0.025
Barrel Sbpe, S:
0.065 fit
Voicaft V=1.49/nxR'axSra:
11.09 fbsec
Bartel Capacity:
54.44 f0isec
Principal SpAl" CapcitY:
42.41 ft'/sec
2-Year Runoff (Drainage Areal, 02:
39.16 f0leac
Conclusion:
ADEQUATE
SMmmer Sizing
Maximum water volume: 37,485 ffs
Max. Dlammuing Time: 72 him
Minimum Skimmer Siza: 3 in
noorificeplate
drain -down time 71.4 hours
Emergency Spill"
Trapezoidal channel, grass lining
2SYear Run0h (Drainage Area), Des:
53.97 8'/see
Splllvoy Creel Elev.:
691.0
Spilhvay Width:
9.0 B
Side Slope Ratio:
3.0 h: Iv
Water Depth:
0.50
Area, A:
6 23
Wetted Perimeter.
1287 h
Hydraulic Radius. R:
0.492 8
Roughness Coallioient, n:
0.090
Slope, S:
0.040 ft81
Vetoclly, V=1.491nxR'axSd`:
2.06 6/sec
Splihay CepacitY=VxA:
12.82 101sec
Capacity Required:
11.56 R'lsec
Conclusion: ADEQUATE
Min. Top of Embankment Elevation:
691.6

•
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC -- Lexington Quarry
C. Protection of Natural Resources
1. Detailed Mining Sequence
2. Specific Erosion Control Measures
Phase I Construction Sequence
1) Construct gravel construction entrance pad and access road
2) Clear and grub area for ST-7, TDC-CC and TDC-DD
3) Construct ST-7, TDC-CC and TDC-DD
4) Clear and grub area for SB-13, TDC-FF and TDC-EE
5) Construct SB-13, TDC-FF and TDC-EE
6) Clear and grub area for TDC-BB, TDC-AA and ST-6
7) Construct TDC-BB, TDC-AA and ST-6
8) Clear and grub area for TDC-2
9) Construct TDC-2
10) Clear and grub area for TDC-%, TDC-Y, SB-11 and the
emergency spillway
11) Construct TDC-X, TDC-Y, SB-11 and the spillway
12) Clear and grub area for TDC-U, TDC-V and SB-9
13) Construct TDC-W and SB-10
14) Clear and grub area for TDC-U, TDC-V and SB-9
15) Construct TDC-U, TDC-V and SB-9
16) Clear and grub SB-8 and associated emergency spillway
17) Construct SB-B and the emergency spillway
18) Clear and grub for SB-7 and TDC-T
19) Construct SB-7 and TDC-T
20) Clear and grub for ST-5, TDC-S and TDC--R
21) Construct ST-5, TDC-S and TDC-R
22) Clear and grub for TDC-Q and ST-4
23) Construct TDC-Q and ST-4
24) Upon completion of construction of all sediment control or
30 days after completion of any one of these structures,
whichever occurs first, the disturbed area will be seeded
using the appropriate seeding schedule for the time of
year in which construction occurs.
25) Clear and grub pit, overburden disposal, office,
scalehouse, parking and entrance road areas.
26) Construction of the office, scalehouse, parking and entry
road network will commence at this time.
27) Any fill material required during the construction of the
scalehouse, office, parking and entry road network will be
excavated from the pit area and transported to these areas
for placement.
28) Seeding of any fill slopes will be completed within 30 days
of completed fill placement.
29) Excavation of the pit area will continue with the
overburden being placed in the overburden disposal area.
This material will be compacted by running loaded
equipment over the fill.
30) once approximately 10 acres of pit area -has been excavated,
the 18" non -perforated slope drains will be installed in
the overburden disposal area. The overburden disposal
area fill slopes and the mine pit slopes will be seeded
within 30 days of completion of this operation.

C�
•
Page 2
31) A materials lab, truck shop and temporary scrap storage
area will be constructed on the overburden storage area.
32) The initial plant erected at this site will be located in
the overburden disposal area. This plant will be
constructed to supply stone for the site development phase
of this operation. The stone produced from this initial
plant will be used on the roads at the site, erosion
control and plant/stockpile area floor in. The products
at this initial plant will also be sold to outside
customers.
Phase II
1) Clear and grub area for ST-3 and TDC-P
2) Construct ST-3 and TDC-P
3) Clear and grub area for ST-1, ST-2, TDC-0 and TDC-KK
4) Construct ST-i, ST-2, TDC-0 and TDC-KK
5) Clear and grub area for TST-A, TST-B, TDC-GG and TDC-HH
6) Construct TST-A, TST-B, TDC-GG and TDC-HH
7) Clear and grub area for temporary stream crossing on the
south side of Richland Creek; clear and grub road leading
to Richland Creek. Construct temporary and permanent
roads leading to temporary crossing at Richland Creek.
B) Install temporary stream crossing
9) Clear and grub area for TST-C, TST-D, TDC-II and TDC-JJ
10) Construct TST-C, TST-D, TDC-II and TDC-JJ
11) Complete construction of temporary road into plant site on
the north side of Richland Creek
12) Clear and grub area for SB-3, TDC-E and TDC-F. Construct
SB-3, TDC-E and TDC-F
13) Clear and grub area for SB-2, TDC-D and TDC-D
14) Construct SB-3, TDC-E and TDC-F
15) Clear and grub area for TDC-A, SB-2 and TDC-B
16) Construct TDC-A, SB-2 and TDC-B.
17) Clear and grub for TDC-I, TDC-H, SS-4 and emergency
spillway
18) Construct TDC-I, TDC-H, SB-4, emergency spillway and
install pipe B 18" CHP
19) Clear and grub for TDC-J, TDC-K, TDC-L and SB-6
20) Construct TDC-J, TDC-K, TDC-L and SB-6
21) Clear and grub TDC-H, TDC-H and SB-5
22) Construct TDC-W, TDC-H and SB-5
23) Clear and_grub center station, plant access road, plant
area and settling pond area
24) All fill slopes and disturbed areas wily be seeded and
mulched within 30 days of completion with the appropriate
seed mixture for the time of year in which these items are
constructed.

0
Page 3
25) Excavate additional overburden from the pit area and haul
this material via the temporary road and creek crossing to
the plant, settling pond and northwest bridge abutment
areas on the northwest side of Richland Creek.
26) Using material from the existing pit area, construct the
center station and install the 12" slope drain.
27) Using mateiral from the existing pit area, construct the
bridge abutment on the northeast side of Richland Creek.
28) All slopes and disturbed areas will be seeded within 30
days of completion with the appropriate seed mixture for
the time of year in which these items are constructed.
The plant area will be excluded from this since it is a
high traffic area and will be floored in with stone.
29) Construct the bridge over Richland Creek. Plans for exact
bridge abutment placement and supports to be provided to
the department prior to construction for its approval.
Remove the temporary road and crossing, and reseed.
30) Clear conveyor R.O.W. from center station to the surge
pile. DO NOT GRUB AREA.
31) Establish silt fence around each conveyor stanchion
footing.
32) Construct footings and erect conveyor from center station
to plant site. Footing locations are approximate and
detailed plans will be submitted to the department for
approval prior to construction.
33) Reseed cleared area for the conveyor R.O.W. across Richland
Creek.
34) Dismantle and remove the initial plant prior to startup of
the plant located on the northwest side of Richland Creek.
The overburden disposal area will be capped with a layer
of soil and seeded in accordance with the appropriate seed
mixture for the time of year in which construction occurs.
"NOTE: In summary, prior to beginning any land disturbing
activity, the proper erosion control measures must
be in place to prevent downstream siltation.

r]
1-1
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHKAST, LLCm
SHEET INDEX:
COVER SHEET
MINING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
RECLAMATION PLAN
DETAILS
M&ECP-1
RPm 1
X-1
lQnI,T14 019rminRl
NMI NOW _ ! . . . __.1.NOW . _
2101 Gateway Centre Blvd.
suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: (919) 380=2610
Fuller Road
Lexington, NC 27292
Davidson County
Phone: (919) 380=2746
i exyryPnn
T
ry
i�
SITE
umcm an
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
LAT: 35.777470 N
LONG: 00.249120 W
rA.13
MINING PERMIT No: 13
PERMIT RENEWAL
2013

NOTES:
I I PERMIT RENEWALS AND/OR
� THE INFORMATION SHOWN HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
MODIFICATIONS.
2. FOR MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS, SEE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,, THIS SITE WILL MAINTAIN A 50-FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER ALONG PERMITTED
BOUNDARY.
4. NO NEW LAND AND/OR NEW EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS RENEWAL. SEE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS AND DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS.
5 THE RECLAMATION PLAN REFLECTS THE INTERIM 10 YEAR RECLAMATION PLAN.
I- -_ - -
-1 I - I
I
I I I 71I I, I
% I \ ) I I Is I \
/ T, � ',
[� I 'f I
I I I I I I I I
I I .� I I I I I
I I -LL I
�
IT I , I
I L��
I 1
T I, ,I I -' I y I If I
I' I " I
LLIT;� , 11 I ILL I - _'Q, I - L.L. I I s LL I I T , ,, 1, � I I Ill I I - L_ I �, LI ,�
I _ILL I- I , I ✓
_T I
_I- llr`I�____ I -- - -,�:�L -L � - I I�-� I I I I I ,I I I I I I ,I
I I ILI, LLL I`
6. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL I ---I - L, I , I I - , I �
,- I --- - F, "I", I 11,t -L / I I I I � T I I 1, IT -ILL / ­-l' " " I
____ -I- I LI.L., - � f\\,--I\\ � 4 ILI, / "/ , III I DILL I fL,_L I
I
RECLAMATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. L' - / ILL_, -, ILI I I- _ID �
III, ILL,
LLILL I I I III
_271- LT1__,L­__ LI., - ILL) LTTLT��, ILL
, I I I -. � - ?,- I I I 11 I I I " , __ 'ILL I )
,III, \ \ ILL, I T It I \ \ I I.' / I " T IT I P � ✓li� II ILI IV)
7 ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. I f"'I I 'I I X I " / / IL ll" I - r­ I I - ""
L5 I A I I I I 11 I I ". � / I I /I I I; I I � t/ I I 1f \,
,I I I -_ I I
- � I ,- I , ) if I I III � I` � ) j I ( , \L_ ', \ - I I L,__­L I / ., I I � !I III ,, / // III 1 IT/ I -I - L, \ I I I I I I I i
� 11 _. ILI, I I I � I I I I I " -1 ''I � I L I I ILL- Im IT --I I
I I / I T , I I, ILLIT , `_ I � I I
ILL. I gvorot 'I- _'r- I- L, _I---,- OTI I II'Ll" `_ I I I I ,"' L_____"f, __, I � I i�'I. 1, ­T__L I L, I � 11 III, I I I y
S. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ABOVE WATER LEVEL (I.E. ROAD SHOULDERS, BERMS, DAMS, ETC. TO BE STABILIZED " rr�:,f��­­­L I CM 11 III / ­- I r- J � III(' 'I i I I I, . I I , \. , if I \ ITT I T f IL I L, I I
I �_II _.,_­­­` IIII- ILI _, I L'Tk, I I I I I I I I I I / I I I ILL/ D, LL��_' �
� 1,`�� I I I T � I If " _, ILI -I lLI lILL-I T I I I I I I I I / / / l I/ L I I ) T I I, � L
. ,II - I, � LI-I I I " I I OIL I�f 11, f I L ILI I LLI " / ILI L­­� ", ,-L-D, I I � 1, WITH VEGETATION. IF SUFFICIENT COVER DOES NOT EXIST, OVERSEED AS IN SEEDING SCHEDULE I` l -- �� _/` I I I IIi` � I ��\ \ L, - ) i j I I I I I
I I I I--- ,I I I
I I I , I I I LLILL ,�_OIO I , � /� -IT, , I L­I­­L%L I I L, I LL \`%LI- I / � " LI I I � L /// -- I I I/ / ,I, L-I ILI" 11 - ; � / , I -1 �' I / II I I ri I
I- ,,ogo �__ -I_-'%`, ,,, -,q� � I I I IT I /,// / F � I�*� \ --,I
`,
mlrl� ILI "­L.4d­ 15��,� 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 \I _ ,I L, I I _< I I__%T
9. AFTER SEEDING AS PER SEEDING SCHEDULE, BERMS AND SLOPES BEYOND ROAD SHOULDERS OUTSIDE THE OFFICE , LL II �r I 1, I I, I I III I, I L", YLILL ) T I ,)r I e 11 I I I 11-4 -I LI, ­,` "Ll. __" Is I I I I ,
I &�5.1 PIN" I I \I ., I I/ ( I ::�� \ \ " ITT " I
,- � ,,�
I_'I I I- 'If I ,,, � `, - I if I ", II% 1\1 ) I I (14, I , I,
��,, I I
-1 II - - L., -ILI', � I ILILLILL I 11 I � - I � X, - I:�,I�r i 00 I` L` I L. -, I
I I I- I I I I - IT I ,I I I I" 11 I I I - - I
I- I ,;L­ I I I � " f - I I ) ii I � i I I-- I ( I II j f AREA SHALL BE NOT MOWED AND ALLOWED TO REVERT TO NATURAL -I'Ll IJII� :;��, -I % I � LI­_1\ T�% � ILL j � ,z ) III
I ILL -_ I, I I I I I / /I I I__ I I - I I LIL_ LIL.. I - I I IT
I I _: �__�, - \I, I j I III, � IT , I I I lk - I ---- 5 4' -, __uL..L__L­LLl I I �
� ;�Lf� j Le, I e I I I " �
-, ILI II ,:: L-1 III` Ilvd-, ,I � I, IILL 'Ll- -1 TILLI_ I I � � I � I � L \ I,
I,
VEGETATION. I /I � I ) Ill III LL )/ \ � 1, I, � Li IT L I ) , / � ) ( I I",\ _­ e I, L P L� I ILI . I I I I I 11 - II , ILL I " / I ", --r- 1, I I,
_�
I- I I I -I-- I - I I ; I I T, \�
I / I ,( \
- \ I 11 - L� -If I I 1 \ I I / / I \ LDI ", I I I I
I � I III I I I I � I - - I -
,I �,j�� - .L�--, / I I 'L / / ) 11 I ,I- I :) I I if I e 0 l�
" I I T,I­ I III )i I I ) I I /// .,I, I Tj I I
-1 OI-�­L- / I I "I" I I I I ...
THE EXTENT OF THE BERMS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN I �f�::�� I ILI ,,, I\ - � 4 \I ILL ) iff,- -�-; � , j I I. "T", ,-I ) � I) I T / � I /L`L I \fI
I ILI, I IL 1, I I,, ­L Ill IT I -_ - I I I I I
I-;��_11� I ILL- - III \ I A, I 11, I I I I - I I I LL 'Ll"LL / I I IT IT I I III I I 'I 11 � I I I I, I
10� BERMS ARE TO BE BUILT AS MATERIAL BECOMES AVAILABLE. �_- ILI- - __ I TLA�\ I 11 A I ,I III �_ I I '' � If I ITILL % LI
1��,I__ w, I ILL *,/�_,.­­ �
ARE ANTICIPATED; FINAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY. I�,TIL­Lf:I Wo I f I I i I, : I I I I \ �,\ L
`I D, l- I I I I I 11 l "LLI' I I I -�� , I I ( ) / If \ I DIft \
I�­­I I- I IT __LL%_` ! I I
:, I` I Ii,kL ITL�' I I I I I I , --- I
\'...--
\�/.
/ . ILL \ If
� ,L_ I ; (' I ,� N � \ ILL , I I I 11 I I I f I I -1 - - - I I - I-
_� _L% I I I I I I I I I I � ( I I ` I- ,I III - - I / I ," I--- - TF - LLI -1 I T
I LII -.I' L_ � \ I III ,I I � I IN 11 I I IIIIe -_ l ( I I L I-- -I, I I � f`� III/ / � ", , L, �T -, � � ,---- ,-- I. \ I , � I I I \ I I
I I '�Ill �&`� � L 1, -1 ,,,,-, I -I I I ___­­ " In I j ,I I il , I IL I - I I I I \1 - I I- I,- & I I I ) I f\\
11. BASE TOPOGRAPHY PREPARED BY! TI I / I 'IL\LfLI -, -1:;�III19-LILL, III " I, \ I I III I 11 ,, ) - I I --, I ,I If .I I I T­ I I I I i
CONTINENTAL AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. I I I /I I, I -- I I I ­­­ , ; I I __ I- ; - I L� , L:LI" LL \ \�� ,I I I I I
I t I T � II III, I I 11 I I I , Il I\ f \1 I I \ I, I - - I IL `\ i. - -, - TLI- /T­ I : I i) I
I ,�,� I I - I
­`­� ,r,--_ I "LL% L , , I - -, " 'r I
I, I � ---- I_ I l" I I I, � - "I III - I- -_ I I 1
3356 REGAL DRIVE I I I (r`,_L I I I I \�, - ,I I T 'LILLI ��L_l LILIL I, I I Il Ill I , 1, IL I I I, � , �', -- JIT -_ ) � I
__L i i / I- ILL -_ � ,I I, I, , - ,I I I I ILL --I ----- I I ­­ - " I� I- ­L,1 ILL N Ill 'D .- L " I, I I If
__ 11 I I - -, N I ix %, -1 ,=�,�`LfII ,/I 1, - � I , �-- I ILI I L, ILL � (I A-L I III I I el ____,L I I I \I\ ll � '010, - ____ - I, III I I I I \1 I ,I �%%l , I i L-, ) L "
I I I I, __ ___ I � I 5� I - _lIL I � � L_ I- --I I L -1 f I " I I I I - LL I I— I " I I 1, I i / )
ALCOA, TN- 37701 .j, D" -_ I I - , ---, � - - I . � I -L-L" ( 9 I _ I \11 I III I " I - ­_ - __ - I LI N I I " I \I 11 I A ,L
_--l% I- If I If I ii-IL I I- % I'LL I, I IIII III- ­%L I I I I
(86$) 970-3115 Il I I I I I I I I 11� I � f � I, I- � I 4 L% III, ­%LLL ILL ILA --- ---- I I / � I\ � L, I I ,I I I ,p 4 - ,III � � I L T! I I I L - \ I 1, I - `II II I I j I
I I I I I I I I I 4 " L --, I I TLI I i .I � I I I � 11 ILI l
I III , I I I I I I I I ,� IL I --I, I I I LIT I I I - I,- I L I %I I I I? � l - I I I I l I k , vIL­ 'llL I I I I
, I I 11 - I I , � ( � � I k , I I ILI I I I I I I I q I I - ILI� I, I D, I I IST I, -_ 11 I L" I I I I , \ \ I I ,; � - I I ­ I I I -� I 4 1 1 I ; if I IT - , ,, I I - - _:� LITT;LL, --- \�<� I / � I- --_ I) ) \ i L ILL I I . ,I I 'T,
12. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM DAVIDSON COUNTY TAX MAP. - I q-, i 1, Tj I I T� I_ Ill n") I------ -1 I I f`f I� I I- , -I _L`11 � I I ,I I I I ­­_ L, I I I I I (r, , , I I I , (I I 11 - ILI, I \'I 'IIll Il \%L I
I I- I I I I I I " I " -Irl ­-, I I ITI; ,f` /D I\ I I I L_
I'- 11 I I— � / I L , I I I - I I k L L\ `I,iL I_I I _I7 " IT I i I I -- \ I I I I I - ,L_,­rL,LLI I I I Ill "I I I ,1sq I . I I I I - Ii III L' ) IL -_ f, �\D:f, � -
, I '. I / / / I I ILI I I 1, I I-L
I I /, .- I \ \I:-- I � I ) / / � I I I I , I I I I, � ,_ I / - LI ,I I I 11 9 I � I- I I I � I I I I I "I
T I ) I I j I %:% ­­�--Ij � � .------ --- - I ) I I f I I - LIL I , L / ( 1 , � I I -I- I I \1 I N 11 -
1� L? ,__ I L I 0 I --- I \� J( ,- TI , -_I � LI, -1 I L� ` � ,� I I /D �-T ILI- IL I I \ I\ j \ I I ff\L II \ � ILI ILL I
ILLAI EXISTING MINING PERMIT NO. 92-13 -, " I � 1) IV I /Il r. I- I i �
l
1, LI, I I __ I,
ILL /� I 'LL - I I ILL \ L TL I I I I I I I I l - , I I ; � I I I
I -, - I I I I \ � I ( I I IL I I I I �
,- ,,, " I --,, I I I _l`I%� I /�Nv/�LI f� " , IT IT , I iI I 0 1 I 11 I 11 I F k i --- I /
-1 ) y/ I - ILL --,: ----� /TLL­-�,ii It / Lz, 1, I If I ) I � I I I; ILL, � I -I I T I L
LEXINGTON QUARRY III- __ If IL I/ " " \\� ) r'/ __ _-, 11 I I __ \ I, \ - MY I F ) J 1 ) I I ) III
Il 'I 'I\ I 11-1 I I / _�L ­L ,I, ) I I".. L, I , � � \ I i , I L, 1-1 I ILL -, I I I ,I I ) / " 11 .II
FULLER ROAD I ILL ) �j�[ LILL f I IT, --�j j I I I I T I ILL III I ILL ILL ,,�' I � " " I
- I ) , F I �/, I ,_'I -,I j I I I I - I ILL j/ , ii,/L IL
I ­- I I 1 1 /III; I I, \"� � I % , I IT I I I I I 11 --, / I/ _ 11
-1 I; -1 I - 10 I. - I I I, T / - �LLL � I " I I " - I. ILI- � 1 f- --- -I -, I , "I " I
LEXINGTON, NC 27292 � I I I , , / I, /I f N I I \ j III ��, �-­� I \
It ___L�I - ;� , 11 I __ I I I I ) -;IIII 9" I/ , ,,�, I ILI- I
� <� I I � ILL) I 'I I I I ) I I I � � il ,_jI, I � �_� N
I _� I- 1 - ILL � If, I, I " III I f I ­­­�-­-Le')f III
I III ILL \ LI I I, I I I I , I I I , ,-.III ILL -"-- LL
I IT, IT I � I , T, 'Ll/f III I I Ill" ,I I ) L, i I I I I �� I )
, Ar 11 ___ I I I I LILITILLI �__` T' . ! I I / f I� ILI T� I %T I/ , r / I " I I Iz, I '---"I - I 'Ll, �_­ -I
-2746 �_, Li I L L`_� 'll) IT __ ', �1 / I I \ ` I I, >��\\
" I I / / I T / I "
I 11 I I " i " I "I I III I
I I I I � I, , I 11 I I, 'If L I Ill, ��
(919) 380 1 IL I I � 1 1 f" I � \ ,) I I LI_-, I
J "LL, IT 71 I I ,,, ( r I I ) I / / f T, j" : If I I
__ I - I I \ L� 1 I I TIT, I � I I 1, I I I 'I - "-`%I --- ,I I/ ILL I "I I � �-' 1
1 ILL � I I, I- I.- LL, // / ,; I I I� �, ��
I I I 1. ,I - Ill � I I f?l I\ III ILL , L� I I I TOBY LEE, NC OPERATIONS MANAGER ,I � I \ IL IT � N L
- IT � ( I �( / j 1 --Ill I I �I,L_T 4 I '�­­ I I, If -I\ f- I 1:�,\%\)� , / , ,­ "I,
LILL I I, I OF III � ,I,', l I ��
ILL L I I --- I I) "I L' " " I/ I j j � LI : \, I )LIIT�--TY I I Il DI \I, I - LI T­ � \ I AAA \'�, ,\"III\,\ IT I
I--- I � I I If "I I ( JI, I " III) f) � I I II I Il � i I (I 1 L
'I -I- LILL I I I ,` III 11 / ', / I I I LI I . I ILL I T � \fL ! i �,, ,/ I/, or� // / 1h I
I 11 � 11 I- I I I ,-III-, ''I I I-,,, T% L, I, ", L, %� k I 11) ( p',,IL �LLTDT' /­,�IIII�Ul
L, l I I %I, I I I I I
- Ill I I I I I . I I I � ILI / ) � I i I
I I � ) Ti , / I . 11 I I-- LL I I LI L, I, I I I I I I / I f I I "Llf T I ILI` IT I I fr`�/ I I
, 1� ILI / L, � I I I I ILL I 1. I )T'I I I 11 if "
-
"I-- - -, I I I �I I I " I I I Lf ILI " ,LL� I I I
I / L, � I / ) t /" I/, ) I I I
I I I I ,I I I I I'LL I . I I I-- I L I III I I j?., ), I - I- 1) if I I 11,
I, I, ,%, I--- - ____ / / I -, / ,--' / / ,I 41 L - I, � I i I I I ,- I I I
- I I I I I � I . � 1i � I, I IT � I I I I I I / ff Ij
­ , 11 I, ILL I I I I ITT I ITT " T, LL/ , " ) I T, I I 1 I I ( I I I '­_ I I' " I I I
III I / I k LTP � I j ) i ) I � � f f I , (
I I ,I, I �11­ I __ I I I Ll I I I T I ,- I IT. 4 / I I ILI I I I I I I � - I f- " i
I, IL- L" I I I , I I I 11 h D'A' I I -1 I I - I I I , I I I I I I
- -I, � __­_ � I I ,-I 1, ,_ " - -, _J IT I I I ,I / /I ) I I L �� - m 4 1 / 11 I,. � I I , � I I I I f I I I I I I I I, ) I I I I Ill I I I " I I , I " I I I I I I / IT . I I I � I
I - If � ILI I I If ,I I � f r I I I L I I IT I I � R,
/I I I I / I IT / � 1��:T; I ,I I I I I //
, F I I I I Ill , " I _- r- I I i I \ I - I III I I - I /// I
� I I I � I [ I / I I � I I I I I I I I I I
I I III / I I . i ; I -_ 11 , / I . IL' ;_. I I I
I, I __ I c I l. I I I I I f . / I I
I
I" r ( - I I I
I ",I LLL_ILL_IL_L --r- I I I I I I I " � f iti"I L, CREEK
IL`L­Nl II-IIJ ,�, I L, I iI - 7 / / II ) - / , i IL I %I ,I---- ___, I I j- � _LI I �) I ­LL, L I I. I f � � If / .
/ I � / 1 L ) I � j rz,f
I , I I TI- -1 I - , ,I I I I I k - I IT I ) 11 I I �)
III IT -- /-) I ILI lLI I // I ,r /­��,��L` LL � I ILL I LITT I "I - ) I I I D, I D
I __ I I � L, ALL -I I I I,, L ; I I I I I jr �, I/ / ILL 1 ?/,' , el I MUR PH I-- I, I � / L ---­� I I I , - I ILL11 I I 11 I � 11 I j I I Vr / 4�
LILS, ­_ �, ( I ----- KiEE IT I � IP, I I I, I, / I 'l, I �, . .�TI�IL I I I- T Ir r I I
-I __ I L" Ill ILL ,I ILL It .,� I
I I I I I I . II I I I 11 11 I 11 I ,I ILL, T I IS 'I
III " -, I I� I I ILL V , ,L ?, I- L_ - - ILL - I ILL I I " , I I - I " III I- ) L� I _
I I
t I ILL I ---- 'TV - MR . ) ,-ILLL
MRS. � I _I/ �
S� , � ZL'(DEA,fLLL" -' I - -I ,,;I: L I I I I IT (zp
�,�,__ 1 "I
- I I - I , L,
I \ 1, I I I
-I- I- L_____ _% I - I I III � - _IL-- " I F I
I - I - 1, IL \ I I _r` _-
r I 1� I - I I I I I, 11 ',I_% 21 I, III- /J I
I I III� -- I I I LLIL I I I .� � 'I ILL
IIILL I 1, LP I I I 9 I
� Ti I V ­­­­LLLLL I— - - I s ) ' ,D�, IIII­ ll� - I,\ILL AI_._ -1 __ I _7 � IL ILL %L_%, -, I I 1�\� I V I\ � -1 I \ I ILL ILL I 1 I
I I �L Il-'­`­I-L.� 11 L, LI__ I T N I L, \ � � ---, ,­ ILL r_­"­ - I- -) i " ALI I I L_ L IIII.LL /-9,I I L I - - - I I I I - --- L� I
, I I I I / ,I o)[ I -I 3, I \ � L I / Ll I ,I I I I __ - -.-- LLI I I- -jam
) 3f � I � %I ) 1 � L\',' ,' if, - _-- I I I,
ll, I I I f I I, 'I I I / I , � T I I I � � I II I - 'I � I I I f I--I, I ILI, s I � , 9 I I I I I I, i
I I I I I I .NTL / I - T� I - -, I I I I ", I I I-- I I - - I, I -,, I I I I - __ I I I I I � I ) V i ( ILL I I If ? i I, ILL I I I I I - 9L 1 $ I IT - I
I I I 9 I I I - I I I I ILL - I I I - I - I I / I 'I I,- i � I � � I � I \ \ T � I ­`__% I v ILI, I I - I II I I I I I I
,I IL - I / I I L., - I I __ I I f
1'Ll" IT ,� _' 'T I, I I I I I II I Illll_­I�LLL I I L, , I I I I � � . __ I I I I I ol I I
I I\..., -_'..,.__
I I L­ I, " � , I qI i I � I T Ir 04S , ILL , I 1, - I - / 'I I Il I " I i I I L, I ILL I I I I I . I . I z 4 rl­-_�­ � ��z_ ----J- L' \ I I I I I I L­I­l, I i
� I I I 1, I __v. r - `, I I I I I I I - I I, � 1:I_ ­_ ,I I I I I \ I I I I - I "
I /-R N I I � . I I DL LI " i III < \ 1 I I I I
I I � I 1 i . I I / I - ­- - I , ILL I I I I I I" IL, / I , ILL I II I­_LL:_ - I ::L 11 I " , I ,I ILL ", I ILL I , I iILL I I 1, 1, 0
- ILL- LL --- I , I I I I
I Ill I I IV I / IT, � I A I L., � L, I -1 - - I I/ -
ILL' Lf I, I, - I ILI L I - I I I ( I - - I --- LI I I I , , I I I IL I ---- I
\I, I I " � I
11 III, I I ) I
I- I I f � I I "I
/ I / ,,L_1 I "I / I I I I ", L, - Lv_ I
� f I "I I `L I I ILL ILI I I I __1 . - I 11 ILL I L I ILL I I � I ,LL I I I I I I I I I I, I \ I I ;
I--- % I I � I � I \ L I ,I ,_ I I I I I I III, I ,L­�LLTL I, I \ I
I I I ', I I I \ I L ) ) W� � I IL I I \ 1, " l f, I; I L, ILL lL I i 11 TFi- \ I I I( / I . IL, I, I
III, I , I I I L,[l I I I IIIIll- I I I I I I I I - I
----"- i I� LLI i I I/ I I I i ILL, ILL-, I I IT JILLILL 11 I I I I I L 11 L f � ,I �­I _�I I ) % I \ % I I I I ( � T"
__ ), I- -I " ILL I I, L � I "I i 1 5 _LL, I I I Ii I'll/ I I I I T, --I k I T \ - I I, I I ) LILL-I / I \_ I I III I � LI
I I� - -I -1 I I I � I , ) j I I ,�LIT ILLI IIIma I ,io If, -� I I I I �
I - �i I � "Ll'I'LL / I I " I I, 'I I I i IT I 1 ,I! I I 1, I 1 4 1 1 I I if � I 1, ( I I T I I I " \ � LI ) \ - I 'I 11 I L" IL I If I ,- . \ I I
I ILL i TI/ ) i I �_ Ill I IT I I - ,_ Z� `_ 11 `.,I �, � 1 \�.\'JAET 1 1 1 1 1 I I I k ii I Ill I I I
I � l I I I , I I III'
I I I I I ,L %, I - a __L_" _` I I I I � IT ILI , I I I
I - --I , I � '� '\q - II I - I - T I I I I I Ll�-- I \\ I, I __� I I
i I �f I I -I -11 I III - I i � '� I I � ILL, I_ _el/ �\ " I , �� - I I IT II I I I I I, I
I --i ,,, /I I " IELL#ABq�\ ILLI ILI I I _' I II - -I- I f I I' " I I
I � Lq_� i� I f � I L,I If I I I ILL � I
I I I I I I I LIM � I I IT
, I Ii I' I I- I i, I ILLILLI - I-ILI Lf I ILL ,`0 I
2 I IT, 1( /LL T% - ". I, - - I I I � L­,_�-_:�, I i I � I 11 I
"­ I ,i I I_ " -I, ILL I ­-L-I _L­- -I,I \_I I I I I ", __ IT ­­�' I I I I - I ,I
I I _I I I I ,,-I I --- I __ ILL � I I 11 I \ \I\ , I \I I I - I I ( I I If I - � 1 ) Il_ /
-l' LI-­­ I I I L -1 ;,'`.I'--,, - I, L'I'l --I- I-,� I L� 11 I I
I J I ILL, I I I-, I I I I I I I I_ J, I I I' I � -1 I I 1, I I I I 11 I ILI I IT ILI I I I3 I I ,
-- I LILL-' I I- I 1, " \I I, I I I , - - 11 ) I I I I � I " 'LL, ___ �,Li -1 I I / L, ) ,L��L,TTLLL I I I N T " I'L,
IT` - \1 \ I I I I_- I-- - I � -III -I , � I Ill/ I I , 1, L­ I 1, I l I ­ - I I) 1 I I I I I
I � ILL I_.ILL,_ I I i -I ILI " I I I- L - III I 1 ILL
I I -IrL I /l ---, -11 11 I I \ I I I %LL_%_ I I I _I/ I- I I LI __LL ; III -I 'TIL " I If �;�, -,,I I i 1 1 I I If I\ I I I I ( .1 \I
i I � L_� : ___`I ILL, I I f, ) Ti ____._____r­" I I � 1, 1; I
I ,I I L I ____I �__, I ,- _LLrLIr I,w__ � I, I ILI _­_I� I'ILLLL&L I I, L, If 1, I �, - - , ( I I 11 - ��` IT ��ILL ,�,__ __ I I\ - , L f ,If i �
Ill- -,-I- 2 " I ­1 I I � --- I _�_;� I I I I I IL f
__ I ILI ­LILI� I -DIll I �� I I I I F ILI I �_ " IN- l --- I,
� I m I 11 _,L_­-- ILL L %, __1 ,I If IT � I x - I I I 0 i I I
I � I I � I I I - I 'i I I �_­ - -I- I I I / I I I --- I � e I I
"l I , ) I Iv, I, I I � I
I - -L , I \D I --- __ I -L I if�// I , ­­\ � __ - _: _%I 'ILL � - "I I �`? I f I I I f I I I or� / I I T\ I ; , L IL " I I I ­ I � I— I � Y T I%LIL�__ --- --- I I -I , I I �, i ,_­%%_ I , 'L : I I I I ILL - L" , f., - I- I I 1, I �� I . I/ ILL I __ - � - L --I - , �, li��_ � ILL I I I . I I L, I l I - k
I I I I, 11 I I , I I, __ I I
- I I I I j I
I
I ILL I I I
_TLII-
I I;D -IT
LI I I I \ ILL I I I %%�,`I - I -I I I , I -1 L I L, I I I I I _ i, � I- - I I -, I I I I j, I - I I ILL -, - I I I__ , I, , I, I I ILI% I I -.I, L IL�l 7-11 ILL
I, III -I _­ -, I I I -I Z_L"I , / 'LL-I _:� , __ I `% ` ILI I \L-L � IN LLI-, T I I I I I 1, I,- I II " n
, - I - - I F, . I I I I-r' , I - I I I I
I , I -I I I L, , � I
I `L`­­­­ I m
`L `L_ ll � I I _, ­ I I I ----- �, I I- , � If
,­
�`- III-1 �, ) j I I \ \ I I � I I i I f " I L IL%I I III ` LL ILL/ I I
: I I -- ILL/ __ I � � - LIL I I ­- I - I - i I I I I IN, I I
I ) - __ - I I I L, I -I J"1%ILr ,_ I ILL \, I � L -I, - - I � I -1 I I I IT I I I I -
I I 11 I ILl " ,--, L", I I I I l I, I I I 11 ', I , -1 I I i ( I I I I I, I I I t I I LILL I � I I ­\ - �
, I II,A__.
'I � I, - - ____ I I I I I I 1\ I I I ,- I I I
I � I I " , lTL I I � I I `,I i ITIl.,
i j I � U l, ,III I \__ � , I I I ILL __ TL I l III\ j I I � I 1.11
I - - - , , I - I I 1 - I , " I !k I r Ljj �
11 I I _-I I -I I \ � I ! I I l, � I I I L, I I I \ I ', � - __ I I I " Ili I I 1% 1, " I I
I I I 11 I I -1 I I I I T I - \ I -I- I DII 7I 1 "I -,,I I Lf, I T I /I I I I I ; � I " - I I I I ILL) 0 1
1 1 / _I- I I I, 9 i I / / I I I I, � I,
) L
I I - III III I f I I I 1, ," ILI I LIL L/ 11 I L I I I
L I /I I I I ILL T I I ; 1, I FIT I
I I l III " � I I
I �_ ---� / � I I I I I I � I I \ ;
I I. I - I ILL I -1 - / � ) I IT 4 I I
I 1
4 1 l I, I___r-rL - - I "'LL I , � I- III ; I I / I., ILL /L I / I I/ I I � ,I - ) I I I I - I I � ILL
I / I I- � III \ LLILILL� , I I 11 f ill-l- I I I I I ,, -1 I / I " I I I T I / I ? - � I 1 I / ILL I z�i I V, _�� ILL
I I I I I I % , I'll __ _/ I I I ILL I / J I ; ) � 4I I I I I I 1, 7, I � ILL , I
I I 11 "I
I_ /, r/
) I I I I I I I I L" ) ( \` III I , I � / ILL � I I � 1, I � I IL
T\ aIZABE 1*� ,- 11 I I Ll�rI ,i\L 5L,
I I ILL, D L _LI1 I . I /,I I I. %I ­__ ,,I L f � i I / L I il� I I -_ I I ILL 11 Il I -I I � /,/Tlr/L- " li� I I D� I ILL- ( . ON I -III- I ,I- I I----- ____ TIL /L ,I I ---- ��I, I I - ILI I I I I I I I ,, LTL II I I I I I
I I L% L_ I I I ( ,// � �_ "I ­\l ILI )1\ II I Ill, IT I ''I "LLI
I I,_ L 11 II Ii f � - ____ I, \ L-LI /I � I --I 11 "LL ,%%IL T I I, - "I III \ I ILLl I 1, I I , /111T TL \ I ILL, I I I
THI D. \I / I ILL- - I IT, I I ,I I I !
I - 1, III I I II'll" I I II I I ILI I- 1I 1. - 1% 1-� I ILI I I- __ I 1, 11 -Ill I " " " I I � I I I ',I � L I I I I- \ I
- I I I I I I � I I I f� If` I , I� -� I -
�, I I- �2 I ILILL L I I I L I, l IT I I I, I I "I ( : ( T - I- I __1 'I'llI If il , I I ILD I - I I I I I I / l ILI I I ------ 1,`I.I � 2
� --- I 0 I I I - � I I "le X, -
ILI I I- I \ " � I I T I I I I I . I l I 1 6 IT I\\\ I -
I I -,-I' I 'L 'l, I �\ ILL-L-I L"'2"l ,I- 1, � TL I \_ ILI I III p ,-I - IT I I I I I v` _-L, I I : I I I r_­%l" ILL I I III ,I I I I X, Z 'Iff " LL )L-4 I I
I I I -, I _"­ F� I � If I- II ILLI-ILL'ILL! � , I I I 1, I \,\II�� I I/ " 11
I I I I I I I - \ I, --I, I / l " III/ I , I -- IT /I
I , I -- I I I 1, ,I - f -I I I I " \ I' I L" I � l I I I ,TjI/al I � I I, -I, I, 11
j � ) , I, I ILI - so I " I I I I L / I ,__ I I I IT I I I -1 IT /I f _­ ..­,�'_ 11 � I I I ,, I I � % I/ I �%LIL I
I I - \ _'I'LL, I I - - __ 3 I I I I I, ! I ILL \I III I I I 11 " I � - � I I
,,L I I I- I I `9 I I I � I I I I ,I -, I ` I I � I I I l - I ) � - ­ LL , I \ I \\�,
� I I LJ LrI. �I � I I f � 11 I ILL I , I, LI I
I L" I I ,I I I ILL I I I I
I L I I I (I
ILL I I--- _1
I - / 'I j � I / i
I
I
f III I ll, , I I I, I lI \ I I% L If c IL ( I T _ � I ,I
� N ( I I I I "­_�IILI I (� I ILL I,,- . 11 IT - -,- ­­
! \ I I � .1 -LILL, __ - I, - ,I I __ T,
L, � , \ ) I I I I I I ) \ I I I L / - ILL II %%L L,
-'I- I T I I __ LILL � I ,_ , I / , I I I I ll I, I I -IIIf
r I III I I %
If I T I I I III � I
I I r- I T III j I I � \ I LI \1 ,I IL \ \I I I I , l I I f, I` 14:i I I - _L__ I � " I ,:�� I I I _L__ I- , , I, I
I ,,Lr- _ I I ILI I _ I I I I IT \
j , ( ILI, , ILL, \ I, - I I I � I I, I I I L " I ,I I I I " I I I I I ; � ( - I __ , I � ILL% LL, I __ I I I I , I I I " i I I )I I
f�� ) I IL __ I I � I I- I I I /I ) _I, I, I � I I I I I I I - I � I I � III I I ,- '-I-, I ,_I � I \ I I - I I - I 11 I 6 _L I I I
I � � I I I : \ I f I I I AII_ T I I � 1, 11 I I I I
I
I I I I I / " I. ,I
I I I I I III , I I I I' I
I: ) I, l I I I I I I ,I I I I-LI , , I I � I I __ k I I
I II I I I ­_ - I I I TI - - -.I I I \ '- - I - - I I - I I 1,` I '�"� I I, I, I I
- - I I , I
I I I I - I % I IT, I I I ,I I f 'I I I /I I I I I- I ir ILL_ / I I \ I I _ I - I I - - 'I -I I I i I IlT I
i I T I � � I I ) � ) I I 1[v � \ I " I L I I I I I - I , / /fL
I -1. I I 'I ll " I -I I - __ I ,�? I I I I I I - I - I
I . I � I L, __ L I I � LI - I I - - I- I I I I I I I I I 1 f �
I I I r I - I/ - I \I I T `L --- ,__ I I T I I I I I k� I ) I, l \ T, I I I L � I I- 1, Il --I f , � I ) , I / I I I, I I I Ir - I I I I I I i I 54 I I I ­ L -, - 1, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I " I I I LL I I I I " I I ,I I ITL
__ I 'L­L%__T I - I I' - I I I I )I L; � I I N, `_ Ll I I ,I I I � I I It " 11 I I I Il I ILL I I r
I
I
I - , I I \ I I ILL I I I I I - - I I I - j I I I 11 I I
- I I I I I 1 4f % ILL I " I . I" L, - 11-1 II � - -I 1, I I I I I I \ I -, I I I I I \ ' \ "I ' IL L I I I I I I ,I - I I , I 1, I I I- I I I " I I/ 1 I ILL,
� IL I - I ILL � , I I \ �% I \ f -) I \ I - ALI I , 1, 'I I I I "Ll I -1 I I I _I ` I LI I / - _­­L I I I '---, f If \ IT I U I 1 -4 1 1 - ILL ", ( , � S' II I. I ll ­­ 1, I � I � I I I I I I I / 1, I III, I I I - I,-- - ILL I I / I- I
I I I I � %, lI I I i . 1, � I I , I " i \ I I I L f I I I �
I I I ", I � ILL I I I I I L, � / I I LLI I I �_ - /
Eill'�L ­"XON ,III I Il - 11 I I Ar" I - \ I
I- fL I I I Y I -1 l I ,I ILL - ",
- ,,I I I 11 LI I I � I I � I fl, 1, I I I- I I I 1, I - , ,4 I I Ill __I _ ', _ I �I ,I I I I I, , I I - , I ­%­ I- I I I -1 I, I I I I r - I 1, I I L, \ I I
%,I ___- - I I I I
I I I, %ELL�" I � "I i \
I ;I I I I I , I
i I , / I I I I I I L I- I
I 1 11 " ILLILL _ -_-' I,l� ," I I . I L, I I
. I
I `%% LIL `__ I I I (I ,I ,I 1, I 11 \ " `% I ILL- I I IT ,-/ I -1 I / I /I I/ ILL I,, ) t� i \1 I -1 jl� ,,I , ILL- - -, I' I 6
__ i ,L __ I I I LI I � � -1 I I I - 11 -II LLI I ; ITT ILL 1, I I, `\ I I- I L � L ,\,
i I - I, %L%L ILL I- -, I I III III 11 I I---- I I IL T ? I I I I 11 I - ll � I
� 1) �/,
I � �
I\ �,
, �' \(I, If /I
`_ \�'
11 � �//�
if, I I, 'ITZ"'
r-'­
I
-
L
I` - za<\6
��Iz�,�
_� �_,
ILL
IL
ll, -1-L
i
�
I
ILI I I I � -1 I \ 1, .- 11 I I I -
-L , III I I I �
I I I ? III
� ILL I I ILL , -
I I
11 \ LI I I& I III I I 1\
I I i ILI � " I ILL I \ � I I---- l I, 1, `% I I `I� I I � i i 11l I( I% T, Ill I f I­mLl, I I, � I / I T` I,- 11-11, I l 1, - 11 � Il, ILL, L, I 1'�,.,TLILLI "
I � 11 � I I ', I I I ,,, I-, \ \,\" I I ", \I\
I LI I -, I I -I I I- I- I I Ir -I I T& IIIIIfII L, I I � I I I I I I I I � I --- AI I -I I I � I I I I -, I I \'LI � I
T, --- " \, " I I � I -I I I I I I I I I I I I I ILL / 11 it- I I ILI I ,i � I I- II I I I"\
I 'I I "
I I I I. \ )I I- I L, "I 1�1 __1 L� 11 I 11
�r'S � I r, I I � I I I, \I I- --I __ I____ I � � � I I I ,
� i I I I
-, ic - _-, -a',% I� 'I-
I
I I I � f L, �l
I 11 I I I", ---.--- i 11 _ I I ILI I I
I I I � E I _I
- - I I , � III) I j I I j I I% I I � _LLI% I DILL I Ll I I :T I I I ' I I 5 I L, I I -I I I I I
-1 I \ I I I I I I I I I 1 �A ILI I
I I I I
I
II i I L I I' - I I I I I I I ) III I, I I III I `% �, I I , - I ____ __�, IT I I L'i I L I ILI - I I L - - ", ILL— 'I ) / ) I __ ___ I ,__ __ I ILL I I LI i p v I I I I I I I I I, ", LI I \ I I� j cely TIT, I I
I 11 ILL; f I f I L­­_1 - "LILL 'I ILL I_ ,,_� I ,I I ILL- I I,- ` / k . t j / _`,___� L" I " I L I I I 11 I T \ \ \ 1, I I I I,
,I \\ , All. / NN�ILL_%= ­`_­ I f I, IIL
T III _.� . ,I- ILL 11 I I I/11 11 `L I
,_'L I I I I I ILL � \ I .- �I I - Ir­` ___ I il I I z ._.r' I, // � I � rI (I ,I I \\' I ILL- I 11 ILI ITI II -ILL'", I- -IL ILL ---\ II
I --- I I _­`L%, L, I I i tT,m_L_ILILI---­­_ I __� 11 " � I ,If I
I L I - ­L, ", 1 1 % I I I I III e I- I, I I� DI I I I I If ,I I\ " 11 - 11 I __%, I `L1_
f I, I -1 I ____ -I I; III 1 I I ILL, L_ T, ILL Ii I ____ I llL I, , 1, I IT ', \ I 11 I I,- I `% ,I \ \ I I I I I -I 11 /�
I �, I ILL I i 1 1 I I \ 11 IT - - I I " / I I (I " I \ I i ILL 1, I-, \
I \ I T, I T W� If I " I LI __ LL", -L� I - ­_ I- �-:�� - L /I ,r \ \ " ) 11 L I, _IL
REV If
-
I
11 I
I
I LILL
ILL I I 1­
I
I I I T.
,) "" I I
I ",
L LIII
III I I I I
ILL l I " - I I I --l-L ILL, I I, ILL / -I
I I, III -,I- " I' I III .,�j /
ILL , LILI I I " I- "I - ------ I I
,
K l,
I � I T� - I , 11 I IT ,�I,- I
I
I I I If I I I ILI I I I I � I
1 I � ,
I z IL-_ I- - I ILL I I I
I I ILL I I I .`�
IT I L, IIII
��4
'I I I ,
,I"
-0- APPROXIMATE BLIELL LOCATION
I I IHARLIL % j"IN,
I I I I I
1 I
I __ �
I I - � ll
- -
ILL __ - -
� le 11
?I L,­,Iz_�II- I ,,I- I I I
IL I- I _/ -
LI - - I I - ILL-
-
I I
I I I I I I 11 f I I I "
I � I I I\ I I-,-
k I-- I I I I - -
-,
,I � I
�I i I I
l" ­
I I I I I
-If
I I �
I I C 4Y a F �EXINGTQN
I 6
ILI I
[- 1,
lI� __ I I II,
I I L/ , I LI, , " -I((, -I---,-
/ �
I
I
-1 _�` 6
_. I
11 I I. I ILI __ ­_ ­
"Ll I
� I- 61 11 IL �
I I L __ I -I \ \ I I I - 11,
I I
A, �j flil � I
-
I I I, I __ I I, qN, ,, -I I
1 E)MNA I � ',--
­_
-1-1_, -
I I III__
`­LLLIL I. _r 1, Lr­ I � I I, III__ III
III ______ 1, 71 LLz , IIIII
ILL I I i LL I I L\
­' I I I
1 if) -1 I
11
LEGEND
I I I 1
I I I I L, ILL' .'l, I T -
, 11 I I ILL �s
I% , I I �,` ILL I L, IT
- � III
I
I ,I I-
( LII%%%L `__ -_
l
'I ,I I
III
" 6 1 � I I'-
I ,I I ,
I 1, 11 II ---
�
I I I I I
I I I 'r I I I
_I` I I
ILI I I
,III I, SE ES',,LL3pjE 'IT, LIL ILL, I
6 ,,,I L 61
" \ � �ill%)Lff­ __�, I, I'
I I -,-,I l " I I I
,I " I I
ILL LII I ­­ _­­ 6
- ILI
I'LL/ I L I --- - .6 I
I A -D, I
I,
"
,I I
I 61
I I I
__
I. .. I I` I ILL I / I 6-
� --- L, I I - I I
------- -, " � f - ­­
-, I - __ " I I
I I T i I I I
,r .r I
I -- - I/ 11,
Ii
ITT, LIr"El r1rL ITT ILI ILITLI MIAT
I L I L,f I I I I" 1� I I I I - --- __ I
I LI r I I I
ID, %- I -I- i I �
\ �
T
ILI
ILI -� � ) LL / ---
--- I I ,I N I T I .1
- ' \ � I L,
\
if ; I I
I III-- -1, I � I I
�
I
I ) 6
r_LIr , I
I I , , I I
\ / / / I I
II -I - I I 11 \ I ) I , . ,L __ I �
f I
I I
If
I I Ill 6
,­L, I I If
I
_r \ I � / I I, TL ---
� L, \ IT I
, I I I I I
I --- --- - 11 - I I I �
I I I 1, LL
1
"'I
l T%
(
ITI� TI FISTA31 TILLIET In
11-1 11I S7,1,1 i
I __ - /I r- -­ � I ( LILL` ", \ I
1, �
/ �, I I I I OLST A,I� EIRAN ILL
R
I I
- I
I I I 11
,L
I I I __ 6 IL I I 6 ,r
I I I , If I I I I
� I � If I T I I
I I I I
. I � I It Iffi,
I I I - l, i ILL
I I l i
III f I I I I
I,
I I I
I ? - I I
I I I
I I I I I I I
� I I )
I I
I ILI I I
I I
I rt, I 11 II
( I I "
� -I- � I I I I
- - I I I I ; I I, I , I
I I I
I) I
I I I
I T I
I I
I I I i I i
/
I I I
- 'I- I : I I ,I
�
\
I `NN LANIER I "
T A
\ T I/
I
l I
IT
/ I L /I I - __
I 1 I
I I V
- I - I I i I I I I
L1,111 III[j,
I
- I I ?J I
ILL,
� I I
I I
I; 1, I Ir
I i I I I If
11 LI
I I\
I i I I I ,i
I I - I
IT I
I II
I T �
/
I ,r I
/RI "
-, I I I/ I -
----,-,-. � _I_L____­­--­ -D
ILL- -1 ILL - " II I. -
_r 1 61 I I
Tj
TrIll
I1DRf C If
r- l
I
-'I Ri CO
I r- __ I I I I I I OMB i I I I % iiiI I I __ I I , I I I --- I I � I I E IV I I - GRAPHIC SCALE. \ , I - - I i I I I I
- ,r I
_--_ --- ---r-- -I--- ___-,_. ___---r-. ----n, I I I I I P'LUGH I I I 1- I I -1 I I I I -
", I I I ol l I I I ii�"�` I I I -I 1, I I I
�) ,,N LATE: , I I - " I I � I HORIZONTAL SCALE: I" m 200'
DESCRE7ON I' i REVISI --- - `­ - i I f I I, I '-LL, I I 'r I I I I I I'll I r� I � � I ­ - -- -r - -- -----"rr I -----
T---------- - � I I I - l, I 1, '-'I I , 'r ,I' ,I ,I I 1 6 TO 0 200 0 200 600
1 _ � I ) � L I I 1, I I I I I I r' If I
I I I I , v I I I I
I I Il- I , I, I I I I I I
II -<'I . I
I
L=��7___ - I -_%I, I. - I __, "I L .I'_LL I � ) I/ ILI, I I //I I
i I L � I I - I I I I - , / I � a-
ri___ _L..L.`%%__I____ , IL I I I L.-I I Lj
I L_-, ­ -1) 1 I I`_L,"LL �
=, a-- RU17 :L`:iTTrTrJTiAt r(LINT)ITILLIMAI IRF PFFMI 9 10-10
- I
d
..J
,IA
____
LLI
0
III
0 I>i
Z
v 0
a 2 0
0 v 9
IT c �Rw
III ILL 0 �m
III 0 III ILL
I M, r UNN
o a zoo
or 0
"
IF 20 m
c Aa = 0
LILL ; ITT
0
I ; .1 X
I Alow
a � a 3 m m 0 �
�
R
C�
j
ILLLL
z
I.J.1
::
I
w
u
0
1
w
I n
a 0
IN
u
mi
mi
IT,
Im
U)
4 )111
US 0:
?l z IR
M
D 0 44 Im
z
U)
4
oiiiiii� D m
0
m
U) cy o
w
.:
Ch
Lu 0: z 0 z
I IIIIIII
w
?
x %j 0
11% ;im 0
M
LI) ImQ a
W :) 5
Z
�
x
ix o z
a
�<
0 0 u) X a
4
)w
dg LLI
mi
z
0
V)
z
4
. z
..........11
z
4
A
am
mi
0
19
I11111
m z
To 0
9
N mi 0
04 z
* 3:
0
I= W 11111111
Z V)
2 Lu o
0: 0: ix
Lu Lu
cim 06
06
4
2
Lu
z
_�111111110
2
OtED
r-----------.---,I ­­
LAB
DR,`LLLN
I I--------
LAB
CHF(LI
LAB
�-
Lei I
I
,OiITILL _ �/ �, �j � 1&�
A13
I
RON. I
ZTOL I
- r- -- --- r- -
LLUTILLI'L ILEXINCION
HA_IEX1NGTfLT_M&LG-j
0*0 III Er
III`
GALE.
-
I
HOPDONTA.
__]
IL = 2CLiLL'
'ARECA
SHEET NO
M&ECPml
I OF 3
_

NOTES: 'J
1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PERMIT RENEWALS AND/OR
MODIFICATIONS. r
2. FOR MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS, SEE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THIS SITE WILL MAINTAIN A 50-FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER ALONG PERMITTED
BOUNDARY.
4. NO NEW LAND AND/OR NEW EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS RENEWAL. SEE "
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS AND DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS.
S. THE RECLAMATION PLAN REFLECTS THE INTERIM 10 YEAR RECLAMATION PLAN.
p
6. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED UNTILIF
"Y
RECLAMATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. �[ _
7. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN.
8. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ABOVE WATER LEVEL (I.E. ROAD SHOULDERS, BERMS, DAMS, ETC.) TO BE STABILIZED '�
WITH VEGETATION. IF SUFFICIENT COVER DOES NOT EXIST, OVERSEED AS IN SEEDING SCHEDULE. -
r
9. AFTER SEEDING AS PER SEEDING SCHEDULE, BERMS AND SLOPES BEYOND ROAD SHOULDERS OUTSIDE THE OFFICE^"���
AREA SHALL BE NOT MOWED AND ALLOWED TO REVERT TO NATURAL ate\
VEGETATION.
10. BERMS ARE TO BE BUILT AS MATERIAL BECOMES AVAILABLE. THE EXTENT OF THE BERMS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN
ARE ANTICIPATED; FINAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY.
1 _
11. BASE TOPOGRAPHY PREPARED BY: A,
CONTINENTAL AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
3356 REGAL DRIVE _
ALCOA, IN 37701
I d a
[phone] MITI
�� I
°"�� J: t�,. MYRTLE SHAAF _
12. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM DAVIDSON COUNTY TAX MAP. - ooTI)% /
.f w, � I q ' ¢ an. F . 1V
13. EXISTING MINING PERMIT NO. 92-13 -
LEXINGTON QUARRY
f
FULLER ROAD /�
LEXINGTON, NC 27292 r - ✓��
(919) 380-274e
TOBY LEE, NO OPERATION5 MANAGER
f/ ;' : I I CREEK
-KEPLEY /
MRS. ESSIE MURFSPI MRS. CLYDE A + ��
a,.E 3 T,
TI
W �
Q _4
^a d _IT
4 _
W I
- I
° SW? IN n ,
Pp J
5� }
` ELIZABETH D. DIXON "�
f� a
i
1
z —
ems
F
� o
i
<' N F V `-
`�
o `l
\flYER3t' RDEr
vu,rt
A
_ xFx
1 REV NO: DESCRIPTION GT REVSION DATE:
AREA TO BE REGRADED AND
GRASSED WITH VEGETATION .EMMA C. M'ANN
BENEFICIAL TO WILDLIFE `& -
(IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED �------------- \ ' .
VEGETATION PLAN) \\\ ' _. BOSS. A.FRANK S�
l� r
WATER SURFACE UPON ,.''.. GRAPHIC SCALE
ANN LANIER KIMREY ? '
RECLAMATION ,� HEDRIC BAGS. .
LUMBER COL
HORIZONTAL SCALE: I" = 200"
b00 200 0 200 600
1
Y
m
W• tn`lab
T UMry
� 0 2O0
m dim
n
me 0
e � E00
p Q
IN
c
v
V
m
W
!9
X
J
J
W >5
H:11 Z :C
INN
C Z
O no
vs W0®1%
W a: z
0
= V
�t/ix®}
Q W
J
Z
O
U)
Z
Z
a
mi
IN J
�a
lz
Lu ,J
d.
DESIGNED. Jr
^_CTC
DRAWN: CTC Jr
_
CHECKED:
WILE
DATE. DEC. 2013
REGION: SOUTH
LOCATION: LEXINGTON
HAJ NGTON R—t
DWG FILE'
SCALE:
HORIZONTAL.
I' = zee'
VERTICAi..:
SHEET NO..
R-1
OF: - 3

A
INSTALL COLLAR MTN
CONTINUOUS CORRUGATIONS VERTICAL
MID
B i/2' X 2' SLOTTED HOLES
FOR 1/8' DIA. BOLTS
PIPE O.D.
a s �-
SPACED B
e' D.C.
r
iAD
BAND
B
G=MNDDUS
WfT.o
B
A
ELEVATION OF UNASSEMBLED COLLAR
12' MIN.
TWELD BOTH
SIDES
ORRUGATED METAL SHEET
WELDED TO CENTER BAND
SECTION B-B
Esaa��E��i7[•7.7
NOTES
1. COLLAR TO BE OF SAME GAGE AS THE PIPE NTH
Midi IT IS USED
2. THE LAP BETWEEN THE TWO HALF SECTIONS AND
BETWEEN THE PIPE AND CONNECTING BANDS SMALL
BE CAULKED WITH ASPHALT MASTIC AT THE TIME OF
INSTALLATION.
3. EACH COLLAR SHALL BE FURNISHED WTH TWO
1/2' DIA RODS WITH STANDARD TANK WOS
FOR CONNECTING COLLAR TO PIPE
CORRUGATED METAL ANTI —SEEP COLLAR DETAIL
NOT TO SGIE
CL
LEVEL PORTION
CREST AND CONTROL SECTION
.I
i:I.I 11 I:I.I I IA I: I I:I.I:I I:I:I.I I I I
I.I FLOW
I
BED' EXIT SECTOR
APPROACH
CHANNEL
NOTE:
NEITHER THE LOCATION CNOR
ONTROL
ALIGNMENT OF THE CONTROL
SECTION HAS TO COINCIDE
MMMM OF
EMBANKMENT THE TIE
THE DAM.
PLAN
X - LENGTH OF
WATER SURFACE CONTROL EXIT CHANNEL
STAGE (HP) SECTION
��� EXIT SECTOR
I�IJ FBI - OR GREATERTr
� I APPROACH
CHANNEL SIIL-
PROFILE ALONG CENTERLINE -
I—
�I i-�
3
YI - �HP 1 q=11 r
�L �1111 7 �I Ii_1a
-� II _ rl" IC�11
- �TI-ljf III III If�Ihf�Inl::Jl I 'IElf � I II II, I�111�-��
fr�l n Liu li III
w
CROSS SECTION AT CONTROL SECTION
EXCAVATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DETAIL
NOT TO scNE
CMP RISER
D
CMP CONDUIT
d
D/2
H
3000 PSI CONCRETE
h
ANTI —FLOATATION
BLOCK DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SEDIMENT BASIN
PLAN
OUTLET PIPE STONE LINING
T
FS-2 FILTER STONE
SUBLAYER 3' BEDDING
THICKNESS
SECTION
SEDIMENT BASIN DIMENSIONS
FiRini:T7!>•SE'�L'IF7LS1t5��L�
IF:��i37t���E37
�SIE�lE1�®_
PLAN OF SEDIMENT BASIN MEMBRANE LINING OF SPILLWAY TO BE ONE PIECE ACROSS WIDTH AND ONE PIECE ALONG LENGTH IF POSSIBLE. TO
SPLICE PIECES UP UPPER PIECE OVER LOWER AND ANCHOR EDGE OF LOWER PIECE.
EV NO: DESCRIPTION OF REVISION: DATE:
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN DETAIL
p NOT TO WAS
BE
BAISIN T
(FT.)
(FT.)
._NCDN
SB-i
10
10.5
CLASS -A
-
10
10.5
CLASS -A
-
1
CLASS -A
-4
,
1
SO-5
10
10.5
CLASS -A
-6
10
10.5
CUSS -A
-
1.
=S-A
I
6
,
sS-B
B-9
10
1 .5
CUSS -A
SB-10
1
10.5
CLASS -A
_ff-11
18
1 .5
CLASS-B
58-12
18
20.5
CLASS-8
PIPE A
13
1S.
C SS -A
PIPE 8
12.5
14A)
CIASS-B
I C
0
11.
CUSS -A
OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NATURAL
SECTION THRU SEDIMENT TRAP
ASHED STONE
B RIP -RAP
PLAN OF SEDIMENT TRAP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL
NOT To s<NtE
A
PLAN
#
1
PRESSURE RELIEF
HOLES 1/2' DIA.
TACKWELD f 0
ALL AROUND T
19
MIN.
aB.,r
SPACE BAR SUPPORT BAR SIZE
(TYPICAL) RISER (06 REBAR MIN.)
DIAMEIiF
SECTION A -A
C bCtlbi pY1LlAR\
sEcnoN
(SEE oEraL)
2/3 B�
B
2:1
2.1
2.5:1
SKIMMER 25:1
(CARP
RISER
2.5:1
2.5:1
TOP BERM
A
PLAN OF SEDIMENT BASIN
cLa:
rxnT,
ANTI —VORTEX TRASH RACK DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION THRU SEDIMENT BASIN
CONDUIT OUTLET
251 CARP PROlEC110N
CONDUIT (SEE DETAIL)
SEDIMENT BASIN DETAIL
Nm To SaLF
CUSS BRIP-RAP
—T
1'
MEN
MEN
mom
iiiiiiiiI 0
14
57 WASHED STONE
SECTION THRU BERM &FILTER
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DIMENSIONS
Muumuu
Eia�ELltE>•Oti•E�f
E1r1
Ei�'�t��i[)•t�l1ElJ-J
Ebel
EiG�I•<1�7OE!l17E4f
EiII�t7il�t>•!1•!f
Ebi1
EiGsf[�1•!F>•Sllfikf
i>•
EiQI•
t�J•E?J
f E✓!
iLE
Elf
�1
-i��>•ic��
o
�E�ELP=�
iSiG�
t�J•iF1Es�l1E41�kf
li.. ct_
11111�7700l1•E3�>tO
IiEiG�
t�iLdE0E7�E>Ff
0
TOP IS 14 GAGE CORRUGATED METAL
OR 1/8' STEEL PLATE. PRESSURE
RELIEF HOLES MAY BE pAiTiED, IF
ENDS OF CORRUGATIONS ARE LEFT
FULLY OPEN MEN THE TOP IS
ATTACHED.
CYLINDER IS 76 GAGE CORRUGATED
METAL PIPE OF FABRICATED FROM
i/e' STEEL PLATE.
NOTES:
1. THE CYLINDER MUST BE FIRMLY
FASTENED TO THE TOP OF THE
RISER.
2. SUPPORT BARS ARE WELDED TO
THE TOP OR THE RISER OR
#TTA@lE0 8Y STRAPS BATED
TO TOP OF RISER.
SEDIMENT BASIN DIMENSIONS
SEDIMENT BASIN DIMENSIONS BASIN
'A'
"B'
'C'
•0•
'E'
'G'
'H'
'I'
SB N0.
FT.
�
r^T,
FT.
FT.
FT.
F7.
FT.
R.
FT.
M
N
N
SB-11
NA
NA
3.0
6
88
10
SB-12
NA
NA
9
2.7
5.5
6.5
6.1
45
10
30
qq� gg
g�Iii
f$�
C

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
RALEIGH CENTRAL Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION LOSMining
A�P�ro- _r�am1 DATE/TIME �-200
NAME ,-�¢ I() /•y�LLJN/ REPRESENTING (� N W 1KG
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Central Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have
the. responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day
program obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a
day in advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be
accommodated. Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Viewing time ends at 4:45 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may
view the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by mine namelpermit no., as
appropriate. The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be
limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if
time permits. Cost per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than
50 copies — there is no charge for 50 or less copies. Payment is to be made by
check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4. Files must be kept in the order you received them. Files may not be taken from
the office. No briefcases, large totes eta are permitted in the file review area.
To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in public files is a
misdemeanor for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with GS 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior
to reviewing files.
MINEY NAME I PERMIT NO. COUNTY
1. LCX,.In�-ror g.tiaw..,i.Qz�idsar-
L - _20-26)(0Z%z3 3:03
or u,in.. Da -he Time In Time Out
'd to form d availahle

��
;A
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemor
Director and State Geologist Dee Freeman, Secretary
October 26, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7008 1300 0000 1123 8336
Mr. James Sprinkle
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
2300 Gateway Centre Boulevard
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
RE: Mining Permit Nos. 26-01, 29-13, 32-01, 32-07, 33-13, 43-01, 43-03, 43-08, 43-21, 51-
05, 51-38, 68-06, 92-02, 92-03, 92-13, 96-50, 98-02, 98-13
Cumberland, Davidson, Durham, Edgecombe, Harnett, Johnston, Orange., Wake,
Wayne, and Wilson Counties
Cape Fear, Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, and Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basins
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
Your request to have the corporate name changed on the above referenced mining
permits from Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC is
hereby approved. As we have received the required surety in an amount sufficient to cover
these operations, I am enclosing new cover sheets for each updated mining permit. The
permit numbers, expiration dates and mine names shall remain the same as before this
corporate name change.
Please attach this approval letter to your existing mining permits for future reference.
Please review the -cover sheets carefully and notify this office of any objections, questions or
corrections that may need to be addressed. I have also enclosed the old reclamation bond for
your disposal.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 • Internet:http:ll�vww.dlr.enr.state.nc.uslpagesllandqualitysection.html
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Certified Mail
Mr. Sprinkle
Page Two
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact Ashley Rodgers, Assistant State Mining Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Floyd R. Williams, PG, CPG, CPM
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
FRWIar
Enclosures: Cover sheets
Seaboard Surety Company Bond No. 384401
cc: Mr. Steve Cook
Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Mr. John Holley, PE
Mr. Pat McClain, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton -WRC, wlenclosures
Mr, William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures
File

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining
Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands and waters
affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: December 18, 2013

A a
NCDENR-
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
Mr. Allen R. King, PE
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
3131 RDU Center Drive, Suite 200
Morrisville, NC .27560
Land Quality Section
December 18, 2003
RE: Permit No. 29-13 - Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Yadkin River Basin
Dear Mr. King:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your application for renewal of the above referenced mining permit has been approved.
A copy of the renewed permit is enclosed. The new expiration date is December 18, 2013.
The conditions in the permit renewal were based primarily upon the initial application.
Modifications were made as indicated by the renewal request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. 1 would like to draw your particular attention to the
following conditions where minor additions or changes were made: Operating Condition Nos.
1 B, 3C, 4C, 5, 6A, 9A through J, 11 B, and 13A through D., and Reclamation Condition Nos.
2E and 3 of the renewed permit.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 158 acres and the amount of.land
you are approved to disturb is 66 acres.
Please review the renewed permit and advise this office at [phone] should you
have any questions concerning this matter.
LSijqrely,
Floyd . Williams, PG, CPG, CPESC
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEDIkm
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton-WRC, wlenclosures
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ, wlenclosures
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures
1612 Mail Service Center,, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919-733-4574 ! FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT_ EXPIRATION DATE: December 18., 2013

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department,
and in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of
this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 7449.
Modifications
April 24, 1995: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Nello L.
Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
May 21, 1999: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
March 19, 2002_ This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.

Page 3
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until December 18, 2013.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Water Quality Section, Division of Water Quality, to secure any necessary
storm water permits or other approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of
Air Quality.
B. The permanent access (plant entrance) shall be paved for a minimum of 50 feet
at its junction with SR 2237. During quarry operation, water trucks or other
means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the
permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer (Minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway or wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the
integrity of the -natural watercourse or wetland.

Page 4
C. All buffer zones shown on the Drawings dated February 2002 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and approved earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. The operator shall notify the Winston-Salem Regional Office, Land Quality
Section, at least 48 hours prior to beginning any of the initial land disturbing
activities indicated in the approved application for a mining permit and any
modifications to this permit thereafter.
B. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
C. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the
Renewal Mine Maps, Sheets 1 and 2, dated November 4, 2003, with the
following additions:
1. The entire temporary stream crossing through Abbotts Creek as indicated
on the Drawings shall consist of clean stone, not earth fill.
2. Appropriate information for the construction of the bridge across Abbotts
Creek, including a sequence of construction and construction details, shall
be provided to the Land Quality Section for its review and approval prior to
on -site construction.
3. Additional sediment control measures, such as silt fence, shall be
provided and maintained at the toe of the bridge abutments to prevent off -
site sedimentation to Abbotts Creek until a detailed plan has been
approved by the Land Quality Section as required by Operating Condition
No. 4.C.2.
D. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not
limited to, expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden�or waste disposal areas.

Page 5
E. All diversion ditches/channels shall be properly constructed and stabilized to
ensure that all surface water runoff from the affected areas at the site will be
directed to appropriate erosion and sediment control measures to prevent offsite
sedimentation.
5. BoundarVMarkers
All mining permit boundaries (158 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site on
100-foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals.
6. Groundwater Protection
The monitoring well program, including seven (7) observation wells, specified in the
Groundwater Survey and Evaluation in the Vicinity of the Nello L. Teer Company's
Lexington Quarry, Davidson County, NC prepared by Atlantic Geotech Associates
dated November 1991 shall be implemented with the following stipulations:
A. The seven (7) observation wells shall be installed as indicated on the Site Plan
(SP-5) dated February 2002 and received by the Land Quality Section on April 2,
2003.
B. A!! observation wells shall be monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any
excavations of consolidated material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the
determination of pre-existing (static) groundwater levels.
C. The observation wells shall be drilled wells (four inches in diameter) cased into
consolidated rock and grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall, at a
minimum, be drilled to a depth of 125 feet, extended at least 50 feet below static
water level, or at least 50 feet into unweathered rock, whichever is deeper. The
wells shall be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The
necessary permits or approvals to construct these wells shall be obtained from
the N.C. Division of Water Quality, Groundwater Section.
D. The observation wells shall be monitored at least twice a month (bimonthly) at
the same day and approximate time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months
following the installation of the wells. The static water levels shall be measured
with an accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum
point and a record of the water levels maintained. The daily precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these records
shall be provided to the Department on or about the end of each month. Static
water level monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased as deemed
appropriate by the Department.

Page 6
E. To determine the water quality parameters of groundwater at the site, water
samples shall be taken from each of the seven (7) observation wells at the same
monitoring frequency as stipulated by Operating Condition No. 5.D. above and
analyzed for the following parameters: iron (Fe), nitrate (NO3), hydrogen -ion
activity (pH), hardness, and color. Said analyses shall be provided to both the
Land Quality Section and Groundwater Section of this Department for review at
the same time the above records are submitted to the Department.
7. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which
can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels,
the erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient
to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the quarry opening shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized within 60
days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum twenty (20) foot wide horizontal
safety bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of any
overburden slope.
8. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
9. Blasting
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance
no farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or
leased by the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle_ velocity, air
overpressure, and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as
provided under Sections B. and D. of this permit). The following blasting conditions shall
be observed by the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property
from surface blasting:
A. Ground Vibration With Monitoring:
In all blasting operation's, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling
house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.

Page 7
B. Ground Vibration Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
W = (D/Ds)z Ds = D
W is
V = 160(Ds)-1.6
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).

m
Ds = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per
second, for the purposes of this Section.
C. Air blast With Monitoring:
Air blast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129
decibels linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted
area such as a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or
institutional building, unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the
seismograph microphone as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measuring System, in Hz in dBL
0.1
Hz or lower -flat response
134
peak
2.0
Hz or lower -flat response
133
peak
6.0
Hz or lower -flat response
129
peak
D. Air blast Without Monitorinq:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):
U = 82 (D/Wo.33)-i.x
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x10-9)
Confined Air blast/Overpressure (dBL)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Air blast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).

Page 9
The air blast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section.
E. Record Keeping:
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to
closest offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of
the blast. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies
shall be provided to the Department upon request.
F. Excessive Ground Vibration/Air blast Reporting:
If ground vibration or Air blast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting
may occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization
to blast at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the
high ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal
approval. Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
G. Fyyrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and
repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.
H. Fl rock Reporting:
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on
the mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the investigation shall be provided to the Department
within 10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions
that will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with
the approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine
site.

Page 10
Studies:
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a
level allowed by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
J. Notice:
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24-hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section Regional Office prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
10. High Wall Barrier
A. A physical barrier (minimum of 4 feet high) consisting of large boulders placed
end -to -end, fencing (such as a woven or 4-strand barbed wire fence with 4 x 4
wood posts at maximum 10 foot spacing), or other acceptable alternative shall
be maintained at all times along the perimeter of any highwall to prevent
inadvertent public access. Warning signs shall be provided along said barrier at
minimum 100 foot spacing. In addition, a minimum 20 foot wide horizontal safety
bench shall be provided at the junction between the top of rock and the toe ^f
any overburden cut slope.
B. Within the first five years of quarry operation, the entire property or, at a
minimum, those areas of high wall with a vertical face exceeding 10 feet shall be
enclosed by a six foot high chain link fence with 3 strands of barbed wire
provided along the top.
11. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening
methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Drawings dated February 2002. In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or Virginia
pines or other acceptable evergreen species shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.

Page 11
C. Tree species that will provide year-round visual screening of the site from
adjacent properties, such as Leyland cypress, evergreens, etc., shall be
employed at the site in areas in need of additional screening. Specifically, in
addition to the locations noted on the Drawings, tree plantings shall be provided
along the northwest side of the haul road between it and the adjacent Kepley
property. Such plantings shall be located adjacent to the haul road rather than at
the property boundary.
12. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any approved revisions to
it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions.
13. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1) on -site generated land clearing debris
2) conveyor belts
3) wire cables
4) v-belts
5) steel reinforced air hoses
6) drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the -following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal:

Page 12
1.) the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2.) a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3.) verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4.) verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5.) verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established.
14. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
15. Bondin
The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$500,000.00 blanket surety bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
16. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 13
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any high wall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:

Page 14
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or Flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12.A.
through D.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
G. Any excavated channels shall be permanently stabilized with riprap and/or
vegetation.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
prepared by Mr. Paul C. Embler, Jr., Registered Landscape Architect, dated August 16,
1991.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native wane season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.

Page 15
4. ' Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued November 2, 1992 and modified on April 24, 1995, May 21, 1999,
and March 19, 2002, is hereby renewed this W day of December, 2003 pursuant to
G.S. 74-52.
By: a OC
James D. Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

MINING PERMIT
IEEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the rightof entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order
to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered
pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLICANT:
Signature: w. Signature: /....
Print Name: James Sprinkle Print Name: .lames Sprinkle
Address: 2300 Galewav Centre Blvd. "title: General Manager
Morrisville NC 27560-9626 Company: I-lanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
Telephone: [phone] Mine Name: Lexington Ouarry
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
mans, anu Inc appropriate Processmg lee tree next page for tee senenmet in me rorm a enectc or money
order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to
the Land Quality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].

Rodgers, Ashley
From:
Gantt, Malt
Sent:
Thursday, October 01, 2009 8:31 AM
To:
Rodgers, Ashley
Cc:
Lambe, Brian
Subject:
Hanson Aggregates (29-13)
Ashley,
We have no problem with the transfer of this permit
Thanks,
Matt
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
INC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Land Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
s++xs««sssx«rss
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROU71NG
ApplicarrCs Name: Uanspyl A� t� Uockg Project Name: _ Q1! arec-ec�
99- 13, 3Q—(,)l) 3a-01, 3o s--, t-Lc
43 _ o t , ApplicJPermit No--33�13 County: Date Received 9 Q y
Reviewer: River Basin Name: u 1
(.0,9-ou
❑ New ❑ Renewal 0 Modification (inside permit boundaries)
qa- 03, 01 Modification (outside permit boundaries)' Transfer- Poz C3 Release
qa_ i3' 50' r Partial Release ElAdditional Information ❑ Fee Ned: $
�� r I�Fee Received: � ($ [70• o�
9 8� oay
9 8 ~ 13 Please ratite entire anvlication
par- 1Ni, W ash'ng,
QAI-ei Q1,Tional Office (2 compictc ccpics; attach the "LQ5 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach �=h the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Forrn" to the other copy; send ipoth_copi s to the Regional Ennainccr)
❑ Division of Water Resources - Date: Routed Reed
NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Reed
L! U5 Fish & Wildlife 5ervice Date_ Kouted Reed
(0niy new applications and modification requcsth that; add land to the permit)
?!easPWujQ first 3 Zges Of the annlicatinn 3M51 aME location mans to_
Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed Reed
NC Geological 5urvey 5ection Date: }touted Reed
(Only new applications and modification raquesTS that add Land to the permit)
Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Reed
(Only new applications)
D Other. Date: Routed Reed
75u5pen5e Date for Comments: 101 (no later `han 25 days
from receipt)
D Please note the following:
�_wjm
1

Lehigh Hanson Lehigh Hanson Inc.
8505 Freeport Parkway
Irving, TX 75063
YaMo'Nuna3..'.•�. ,. Ve'nainNumaai .� ':�?,'1ClieckDw-:.�,'CNiik NumEar'.
NCDENR-LAND QUALITY 1607576 09a1a009 20648805
ImolealDato
. InvoicaNumber
.y Remark6�ry" w'
� - Grosa'AmounG
44.. IseounP
NabAmounB.
09111a009
MININGPERMIT2009
1, 800.00
1,80000
JEP 2,1 )Q�.3
i
I
I
age t of 1 TOTALS
S.1ea0 ug.
�E000-BtEt 6DDoo?
Lehigh'Hanson - - DATE CHECK NO.
a�s[[iwaxrcvu Bank of Nnef N.A,
DNIae.TX15101 �. 09atrz009 20648805
Lehigh Hanson Inc.
8505 Freeport Parkway
Irving, TX 75063 _
r I L, �t ' •J -. AMOUNT
PAY ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND 00/:100"^"'«""""'^"""""""'•^'^""""""" 5...»1800.00
Void after 180 days
C�
TOTHE- ', `NCDENR-LAND QUALITY �. w, Mri/�
ORDERIOF. I f�

a4-13
UAnU J
cb�biCJ,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
> AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
I. Name of Mine Lexington Quarry County Davidson
River Basin Yadkin River Latitude (dd.mmss) 35.7720 Longitude 80.2384
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
3. Permanent Address for receipt of official mail** 2300 Gateway Centre Blvd., Morrisville. NC 27560
'telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address 2300 Gateway Centre Blvd., Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager .lames Sprinkle
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause far permit
revocation.
***Signature FL 4A Date f�ff*
Print Name James Sprinkle
Title General Manager
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of
receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the
tiling of any supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all
required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as
needed. �10,n
i
` SEP 2 4 2009

■o■
■■Im
°' Manson
HEIDELBERGUMENTGroup
2310 Parklake Drive
Suite 550
Atlanta, GA 30345
[phone]
fax — [phone]
www.hanson,com
April 7, 2010
e Ms. Judy Wehner APR 13 111i11
NCDENR Land Quality Section
512 North Saiisbury Street
Archdale Building, Room 519
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Delegation of Authority OF Signature Requirements
All Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC Owned NC Mine Permitted Facilities
Dear Ms. Wehner:
Please be advised that Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC has undergone some management changes. As
Vice President/General Manager for the Hanson Aggregates Southeast area, I hereby delegate the
authority of any signature requirements for the NC Mine Permitted facilities to David Morgan, Operations
Manager of the NC area.
The authority applies to the following NC sites:
NC
Mine
Permit
Mine Name
New Company Name
Company
Official
51-38
Buckleberry Sand Mine
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Mor an
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel Mine
Hanson Aggreptes Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
32-01
Durham Sales Yard
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel Mine
Hanson A = re ates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
98-13
Elm City Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
43-08
Gardner Quarry
Hanson Aggreates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
96-50
Goldsboro Sand Mine
Hanson A re ates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
29-13
Lexington Quarry
Hanson Aggreates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
98-02
Neverson QuHa
Hanson A =re aces Southeast, LLC
David Mor an
51-05
Princeton Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
92-02
Raleigh, North Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
33-13
Rocky Mount Quarry
Hanson A g gre ates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
32-07
Rou emont — N. Durham Co. Quarry
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Moran
68-06
Rou emont — N. Orange Co. QuaEy
Hanson A re ates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
43-01
Senter Sand & Gravel Mine
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan
26-01
Vander Sand & Gravel Mine
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
David Morgan

We would appreciate it if you would please amend your records to reflect this change. Should you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerel��
&is Ward
Vice President/General Manager
Cc: David Morgan, NC Operations Manager
Jack Garvey, Environmental Manager

A
INSTALL COLLAR WITH
CONTINUOUS CORRUGATIONS VERTICAL
WELD
B 1/2' X 2' SLOTTED HOLES
FOR 1/8' DIA. HOLES
PIPE O.D.
SPACED B
R. O.C.
0
HAND
B
CONTINUOUS
WELD
A 8
ELEVATION OF UNASSEMBLED COLLAR
NATURAL
12' MIN.
FCO
WELD BOTH
SIDES
RRUGATE➢ METAL SHEET
WELDED TO CENTER BAND
SECTION B-B
♦..
®®
®ifT•�
�®"
�f1♦
���1♦
NOTES:
1. COLLAR TO BE OF SAME GAGE AS THE PIPE WITH
WHICH IT IS USED.
2. THE LAP BETWEEN THE TWO HALF SECTIONS AND
BETWEEN THE PIPE AND CONNECTING BANDS SHALL
BE CAULKED WITH ASPHALT MASTIC AT THE TIME OF
INSTALLATION.
3. EACH COLLAR SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH TWO
1/2' ➢IAA RODS WITH STANDARD TANK LUGS
FOR CONNECTING COLLAR TO PIPE.
CORRUGATED METAL ANTI -SEEP COLLAR DETAIL
MOT TO SCALE
LEVEL PORTION
CREST AND CONTROL SECTION
�f FLOW
�-
BERN�_
APPROACH
CHANNEL
EMBANKMENT
PLAN
WATER SURFACE
(HP)
APPROACH
CHANNEL
PROFILE ALONG CENTERLINE
EAT SECTOR
NOTE:
NEITHER THE LOCATION NOR
ALIGNMENT a THE CONTROL
SECTION HAS TO COINCIDE
INTH THE CENTERLINE OF
THE DAM.NO
X - LENGTH OF
CONTROL EXIT CHANNEL
SECTION
E%IT SECTOR
,
S _
3
CROSS SECTION AT CONTROL SECTION
EXCAVATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DETAIL
NET TO SCALE
B RIP -RAP
SECTION THRU SEDIMENT TRAP
B RIP -RAP
KEYWAY
'ASHEO STONE
B RIP -RAP
PLAN OF SEDIMENT TRAP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL
NET
i0 SCALE
j REV N0: DESCRIPTION � REVISION: DATE!
CLASS
/57 WASHED STONE
r,
SECTION THRU BERM & FILTER
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DIMENSIONS
M32.25
SFgMENT
TRAP
N
•A'
R.
'8'
FT.
'C'
FT.
'D'
R.
'E'
fT.
Y
FT.
T-,
a
,
1
SEDIMENT
BASIN
HP
FT.
W
FT,
S
FT.
SB-4
0.68
8
3.5
SB-8
0.69
12
3.4
-1
069-
8
3.5
58-11
079
16
3.4
SB-12
OJ9
8
3.5
CMP RISER
SEDIMENT
BASIN
(NJ
(IN.)
(FT.)
(FT.)
SB-1
21
15
3.5
7.5
SB-2
18
12
30
1.5
SB-3
18
12
3.0
1.5
S -4
30
24
5.0
1.5
58-5
21
15
3.5
1,5
SB-6
24
18
3.0
15
-7
1
f2
1.
S -
4
5.
--1
SB-9
3D
21
U
1.5
S -10
21
15
3.5
1.5
-11
4
5.0
1.5
58-12
38
30
6.0
2.0
58-13
21
IS
3.5
1.5
1
PLAN
La
A D1 �
h
1_0 �,g }},,Y��^^�f W
OUTLET PIPE
PLAN
OUTLET PIPE STONE LINING
1
T
FS-2 FILTER STONE
SUBLAYER 3' BEDDING
THICKNESS
SECTION
PRESSURE RELIEF
HOLES 1/2' DIAL
TALKWELD I_ D
ALL AROUND
16'
B' MIN.
M6x 12'
SPACE BA
SUPPORT BAR SIZE
(TYPICAL) RISER (x6 REHAR MIN.)
IIIAMETER
SECTION A -A
BASIN
EXCAVATED
SO
ANTI -VORTEX TRASH RACK DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
1 B,
SEDIMENT
BASIN
N
La
(FT.)
W
(FT.)
STONE
LINING
NCDOT
T
(IN.)
SB-1
14
15.25
CLA55-B
22.5
8-2
12
13
CLASS -A
8
SB-3
12
13
CLASS-8
22.5
0-4
I6
177
CLASS -A
B
S 5
22
1525
CLASS-B
.5
B-B
i
14.5
CLASS-B
2 .
SB-7
12
13
CLA55-A
9
B-8
18
20
CLASS-B
22,5
S-9
14
15.75
CLASS-B
225
SB-10
11
12.5
CL SS-B
225
SB-11
20
22
CLASS-BI
22.5
SS-12
22
24.5
CLASS-8
22.5
S -13
16
lomda
CLASS-B
2 .
PIPE A
13
I Mn
I CLA55-A
PIPE B
12,3
1 14.0
1 CLA55-B
12.
PIPE C
10
I lIm5
I CLASS -A
22.5
OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
TOP IS 14 GAGE CORRUGATED METAL
OR 1/0' STEEL PLATE. PRESSURE
RELIEF HOLES MAY BE OMITTED, IF
ENDS OF CORRUGATIONS ARE LEFT
FULLY OPEN WHEN THE TOP IS
ATTACHED.
CYLINDER IS 16 GAGE CORRUGATED
METAL PIPE OF FABRICATED FROM
1/8' STEEL PLATE.
NOTES
1. THE CYLINDER MUST BE FIRMLY
FASTENED TO THE TOP OF THE
RISER.
2. SUPPORT BARS ARE WELDED TO
THE TOP OR THE RISER OR
ATTACHED BY STRAPS BOLTED
TO TOP OF RISER,
SEDIMENT BASIN DIMENSIONS
� N0.
RISER b0.
D
SB-1
21
76
SB-2
18
30
SB-3
18
30
-4
30
42
SB-
21
36
SB-6
24
36
SB-7
18
30
SB-8
30
42
SB-9
30
42
-10
21
36
SB-11
3O
42
SB-12
36
48
-t
21
36
n¢RrrNPv cDAl wnv SECTION THRU SEDIMENT BASIN
NO PLAN OF SEDIMENT BASIN
ANTI-FLOATATION
CONDUIT OUTLET
PROTECTION
(SEE DETAIL)
ISOMETRIC
SEDIMENT BASIN DIMENSIONS
"A' 'B' 'C' "D" •E• "F" 'G" 'H" "I" ',1"
N0. FT. FL FL FT. FT. FL FT F7. FL FL REQUIRED
SB-1 48 24 NA 2.5 5.0 NA S51
10 35 YES
SB-2 32 16 NA 175 3.0 NA 10 21 YES
SB-3 32 18 NA i.]5 2.0 NA 01021S
SB-4 80 40 8 2J5 B.5 9.40 5 10 42 YES
58-54828 NA 3.0 5.5 NA 010 24.5 YES
SB-4828 NA 1.55 NA1YES
SB-321fiNA2.53.NA51021 YES
SB-8NA NA 11.7 fi0873110 4 NO
SB-9NANA NA 4.0BANA 51042rv0
-1 N NA.70NO
SB-11NA NA 163.5 91 10.3 5 1035O
-1 NA/NO
SB-13NA NA NA 18NA .5 10 28 ND
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL
41
MEN
u0r TO unLc
III vt
ONE
z IBM
go fA
19
e
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL
41
MEN
u0r TO unLc
III vt
ONE
z IBM
go fA
19
e
M
w
Wi
N t0
Wr_
uD '�
s
W16 YI mN
aiJ mD
FYJ �m
Ora mD
w�e-:D Nq
W
gf ��
S F
O
H
2
D?

6 *
w abOUt:blanlC
Judy,
Upon reviewing the revised erosion control plan for Hanson Aggregates Lexington Quarry, I have the following comments:
I. The temporary stream crossing must be constructed as per the provided detail.
2. It appears that either silt fence or a diversion needs to be shown betty en ST1 and ST2'to prevent scdinicntation of the stream
` during fill placement for bridge approach on the proposed haul road. - j
E/Ux.J
I plan on hand delivering these comments to you at the NCS"fA on Wednesday afternoon. �fnoLt,twill also send them courier
mail.
Jason
Jason Watkins
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional office
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
585 waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27167
voice: [phone] ext 256
FAX: [phone]
I of 1 1 1/12/2003 1:54 PM

i
a
7
,+
aCb „ „y Class A Slone
y yMaY 4 tl y „
OPTION `3 „ y �„ �Y yy� �k1 � r
r. t
s baY YY � � �4j1fp Lis -. r s „„
.
„b� 1�-�6 '� to �'•�"r'Y1 iFas °dy'Y mb„
yY „ Y YY ,8 Ito
Streamy-�—
�'`—� „ �, y y„n 'Y' yYb Temporary Road
IV
Class A Stone
Class I Rlp Rop
L=i�6:NOTE: if soil is used os backf�
Secl ion A_A materlot,the Inlet and outlet
slrwld be Rock-plaled.
NOT TO SCALE
Po ] d J.
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING

Lexington Quarry - 29-13
0 0
Subject: Lexington Quarry - 29-13
From: Jason Watkins <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:56:23 -0500
To: Judy Wehner <Judy. Wehner@ncmail. net>
CC: Matt Gantt <[e-mail]>
Judy,
Upon reviewing the revised erosion control plan for Hanson
Aggregates Lexington Quarry, I have the following comments:
1. The temporary stream crossing must be constructed as per the
provided detail.
2. It appears that either salt fence or a diversion needs to be
shown between ST1 and ST2 to prevent sedimentation of the stream
during fill placement for bridge approach on the proposed haul
road.
I plan on hand delivering these comments to you at the NCSTA on
Wednesday afternoon. If not, 7 will also send them courier mail.
Jason
Jason Watkins
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
565 Waughtown Street
Winston --Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone] ext 256
FAX: [phone]
1 of 1 11/18/2003 9:53 AM

10 •
MINING CHECKLI5T FOR ROUTING
Applicant's Name: &VV 1 Project Name: .
Applic./Permit No.: County: /1 in) Date Received: ll S
Reviewer: 0 River Basin Name:
❑New zlenewa1. ❑Modification(insidepermit boundarie5)
Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
0 Partial Release additional Information ❑ Fee Needed: $
D Fee Received: $
Please mPiteentire a.F.Plication parl to:
egional Office (2 complete copies; attach the "LQ5 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach U2l the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy: Send both copi 5 to the �gional Engineer)
Date: Routed to o � 1 RZell
❑ Division of Water Resources Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Rec d
❑ US Fish &Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land t the permit)
Please route first 3 pages of theaapplication and any location
map-02�
❑ Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed
Rec'd _
❑NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed
Recd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land
to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed
Rec'a _
(Only new applications)
❑ Other.
Date: Routed Rec'd
"`5U5perloc Date for Comments: 2 r].3 (no later than 25 days
from receipt)
ease note the following:

0
E
Novemki- -1, 20113
Ms- Kristin Mo%dc
Assistant Statc Avlining, ' 4pcc i"lli;t
Lalid Quality Sectioll
DI'visioll of l-and Ilcs,nrcrs
Department cif l nviromimit and Natural ktcsourccs
I612 Mail Scrvicu Center
R;I I c 1 1). N1.C. 27699-1612
""'Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East, Inc.
2300 Gateway Centre Blvd.
Morrisville, NC 27560-9526
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
'C
Nov 5 2443
i _
kzk . PCrII111 Nu. 29-1 i
LcxiIIz�ton C)uarry
Davidson County
Yadkin Kivcr Basin
Dear Ms. Mmdc.
In scsponsc to IC11C1' dated May 15, 20l13. to .A,lr. Stcvc 1 loNriler, I'.1_;.. conccruiag, tllc ;thuvc
rcfcrenccd pro}cCl. 1 a11 suhlnittin1-- to you IIIC 1,011 %vine inf�,rin�ltic��1:
• -V� vo (2) sets �If;upplemclllal Calculatiolis.
• T\vo (2) sets of the rcviscd Erosion Control Phm and Dclails.
IZc� isir,ns to the I IaI1: inClude the reduirud 111OLIHIC-1601IS 10 the sediIIICII1 traps and haslIIS cu
1;i'4esscsl� 10 C110C1 IIIC',Ul f<<cc urea reyuireIIlcl]ts fur IrappiII`- Clhieiuncy. h/ludilic,ltions to thc• traps
and h"lsins IIlav include one oi. nl()re of111c t'd1mviII". incrca;im, the hCrII1 11ei-111, cliku."n, Ilic
cscav:Itud b;1s1II dinicII;iolls ur rCxlsitiuniW1 IIIC CII1h,snkIIlent IuC;ttio,u.
As shown in the supporting, calclslations, 111csC crslsioII colilrol mcasul-c IIICC1 01' C.NCCCd the
currCnt voluII1C and surf<ICC area rCytlirclncnls.
I Irust 111a1 IIIis inf lrnl,stioll is sul'liCiellt lOr Your revic\v ;Ind approval: should you 11avC
additional questions ur ulnccrns, please feel free Io colstncl IIIC,11 tl1is a�fficC.
Very, truly, vc>urs,
a��/z c
Mr. AlIcii R.Klim,. 1'.1
;.'
I-kansoII r1rc,atus East
2,100 Centre 13ou1cv;Ird
Morrisville. N.C. 27-560-9626
(919) ;5{1-251 l

® 1 •
Hanson Aggregates
Permit No. 92-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Supplemental
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Calculations
E5S10
SEAL °
V
o
J-
022064 =
rV =
o
r
II, y,v Tl
November, 2003

0 •
Hanson Aggregates
Permit No. 92-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Supplemental
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Calculations
Table of Contents:
Figure #1: Basin Surface Area Requirements
Figure #2: Sediment Basin Design
Figure 43: Sediment Trap Design
Figure #4: Temporary Sediment Trap Design
Figure #5: Rainfall Intensity Duration Curve— Greensboro

LEXINGTON QUARRY
BASIN SURFACE AREA REQUIREMENT
PERMIT No. 29-13
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
REQUIRED
REQUIRED
REQUIRED
SEDIMENT
DRAINAGE
DISTURBED RUNOFF TIME OF
INTENSITY
INTENSITY
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED
SEDIMENT
SURFACE
SURFACE
BASIN
AREA
AREA COEFFICIENT CONCENTRATION
(10 yr)
(25 yr)
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
STORAGE
AREA
AREA
(ac)
(ac) (min)
(inlhr)
(inlhr)
Q10 (cfs)
025 (cis)
(cQ
(ac)
(sf)
S8-1
3
2-1 0.4 5
6.5
7
7.8
8.4
3760
0.08
3397.7
SB-2
1.2
072 0.4 5
6.5
7
3.1
3.4
1295
0.03
1359.1
S3-3
0.93
0.7 0,4 5
6.5
7
2.4
2.6
1260
0.02
- 1053.3
S9-4
86
584 0, 4 5
6.5
7
22.4
24.1
10512
0.22
9740.0
SS-5
3.3
2-7 0.4 5
6.5
7
8.6
9.2
4860
0.09
3737.4
S6-6
3.75
1,04 0,4 5
6.5
7
9.8
10.5
1872
0.10
4247.1
SB-7
1.48
1.06 0.4 5
6.5
7
3.8
4.1
1906
0.04
1676.2
SB-8
16
75 8 0.4 7
6
7
38.4
44.8
28440
0,38
16727.0
S8-9
6.7
10 0.4 5
6-5
7
17-4
18.5
18000
0.17
7588.2
SB-10
3.5
2.1 0.4 5
6.5
7
9-1
9.8
3780
0.09
3964.0
SB- i 1
17.1
17.1 0.4 5
6-5
7
44-5
47.9
30780
0.44
19366-8
SB-12
18.3
14, 8 0.4 5
6.5
7
47.6
51.2
25640
0,48
20725.8
SB-13
2,42
0.92 0.4 5
6.5
7
6-3
6.8
1556
0.06
2740.8
STA
2.1
0.37 0.4 5
6-5
7
5.5
5.9
666
0.05
2378.4
ST-2
0,32
0.12 0.4 5
6.5
7
0.8
0.9
216
0.01
362-4
ST-3
0.64
0.41 0.4 5
6.5
7
1.7
1.8
738
0.02
724-8
ST-4
0,61
0.36 0.4 5
6-5
7
1.6
1.7
648
0.02
690.9
ST-5
1_05
0.75 0.4 5
6.5
7
2-8
3.0
1350
0.03
1200.5
ST-6
5.6
2,47 0.4 5
6.5
7
14.6
15,7
4446
0.15
6342.3
ST-7
0.7
0.4 0.4 5
6.5
7
1.8
2.0
720
0.02
79Z8
TST-A
0.27
0.12 0.4 5
6.5
7
0.7
0.8
216
0.01
305.8
TST-B
0.31
0.17 0.4 5
6.5
7
0.8
0.9
306
0.01
351A
rST-C
037
0.11 0.4 5
6.5
7
1.0
1.0
198
0.01
419-0
TST-D
0.19
0.1 0.4 5
6.5
7
0.5
0.5
180
0.00
215.2
TST-E
1.4
0.4 0.4 5
6.5
7
3.6
3.9
720
0.04
15B5-6
TST-F
0.7
0,2 0.4 5
6.5
7
1.8
2.0
360
0.02
792.8
NOTE:
COLUMN No. 1: BASIN AND TRAP DESIGNATION (SEE EROSION
CONTROL PLAN)
COLUMN No, 2: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No. 3- FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No. 4: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No. 5- FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No 6 FROM GREENSBORO RAINFALL INTENSITY
DURATION CURVE
COLUMN No. 7- FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No. 8 Q10 = C I A = cis
COLUMN No. 9: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS
COLUMN No. 10: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS (1800 cf PER DISTURBED ACRE)
COLUMN No. 11: SA = 0.01 x 010 = ACRE
COLUMN No. 12: SA = ACRE x 43560 = SF
0
P
FIGURE #1 LEXINGTON SEDIMENT TRAP

LEXINGTON QUARRY
PERMIT No: 92-13
RENEWAL
REQUIRED
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
BASIN
STORAGE
(co
SB-1
3780
SB-2
1295
SB-3
1260
SB-4
10512
SB-5
4860
SB-6
1872
SB-7
1908
SB-8
28440
SB-9
12060
SB-10
3780
SB-11
30780
SB-12
26640
SB-13
1656
SEDIMENT BASIN
DESIGN
REQUIRED
TOTAL
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
SURFACE
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BASIN
SURFACE
STORAGE
STORAGE
AREA
WIDTH
LENGTH
DEPTH
AREA
DEPTH
VOLUME
(sf)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(sf)
(ft)
(co
3397.7
24.0
48.0
5
3577.0
2.50
4200.3
1359.1
16.0
32.0
3
1457.0
1.75
1330.5
1053.3
16.0
32.0
2
1092.0
1.75
1330.5
9740.0
40.0
80.0
8.5
10106.3
2.75
11328.7
3737.4
24.0
48.0
5.5
3888.3
3.00
5413.5
4247.1
24.0
48.0
6,25
4378.6
1.50
2175.2
1676.2
16.0
32.0
3.75
1763.6
2.50
2225.3
16727.0
na
na
6A
16923.0
5.25
29157.0
7588.2
na
na
8
7599.0
4,00
12151.0
3964.0
na
na
7.5
4132.0
2.25
3956.0
19366.8
na
na
9.1
23987.0
3.50
33607.0
20725.8
na
na
6.5
24394.0
2.75
26835.0
2740.8
na
na
8.5
3780.0
1.50
2261.0
NOTE:
COLUMN No. 1: BASIN DESIGNATION (SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN)
COLUMN No. 2: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS (1800 x DISTURBED AREA)
COLUMN No. 3: SA = 0.01 x 010 (SEE FIGURE #f1)
COLUMN No. 4: EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM WIDTH
COLUMN No. 5: EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM LENGTH
COLUMN No. 6: BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 7: TOP SURFACE AREA AT TOTAL BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 8: SEDIMENT STORAGE DEPTH
COLUMN No. 9: SEDIMENT STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED
NON APPLICABLE (na) MEASUREMENTS ARE FROM BASIN WHICH ARE NATURAL BASINS THAT HAVE BEEN
CREATED BY PLACING A BERM ACROSS A NATURALLY OCCURRING VALLEY AND EXCAVATION IS NOT REQUIRED
FOR STORAGE CAPACITY OR SURFACE AREA.
THE SURFACE AREA FOR THESE BASINS HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY MEASURING THE PERIMETER OF THE
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION AND THE VOLUME HAS BEEN ESTIMATED BY THE FOLLOWING EQUATION:
V (ct = 0.4 x SURFACE AREA (so x DEPTH (ft)
1 J
FIGURE #2 LEXINGTON SEDIMENT TRAP

LEXINGTON QUARRY SEDIMENT TRAP
PERMIT No: 92-13 DESIGN
RENEWAL
REQUIRED REQUIRED
TOTAL
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT SEDIMENT SURFACE BOTTOM BOTTOM
BASIN
SURFACE
STORAGE
STORAGE
BASIN STORAGE AREA WIDTH LENGTH
DEPTH
AREA
DEPTH
VOLUME
(cf) (sf) (ft) (ft)
(ft)
(sf)
(ft)
(cf)
ST-1 666 2378.4 24.0 40.0
3.5
2386.3
0.75
815.3
ST-2 216 362.4 8.0 16.0
2.5
584.3
1.25
278.2
ST-3 738 724.8 8.0 16.0
3.5
854,3
2.5
890.3
ST-4 648 690.9 8.0 16.0
3
713.0
2.25
734,1
ST-5 1350 1200.5 16.0 32.0
2.5
1268.3
2
1604.0
ST-6 4446 6342.3 8.0 234,0
3.5
6413.3
1.75
5195.8
ST-7 720 792.8 8.0 20.0
3
805.0
2.25
856.8
NOTE:
COLUMN No. 1: BASIN DESIGNATION (SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN)
COLUMN No 2: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS (SEE FIGURE #1)
COLUMN No. 3: FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS (SEE FIGURE #1)
COLUMN No. 4: EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM WIDTH
COLUMN No. 5: EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM LENGTH
COLUMN No. 6: BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 7: TOP SURFACE AREA AT TOTAL BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 8: SEDIMENT STORAGE DEPTH
COLUMN No. 9: SEDIMENT STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED
FIGURE #3 LEXINGTON SEDIMENT TRAP

LEXINGTON QUARRY 0 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
PERMIT No: 92-13 DESIGN
RENEWAL
REQUIRED
REQUIRED
TOTAL
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT
SURFACE
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BASIN
SURFACE
STORAGE
STORAGE
TRAP
STORAGE
AREA
WIDTH
LENGTH
DEPTH
AREA
DEPTH
VOLUME
(cf)
(sf)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
M
(ft)
(co
TST-R
216
305.8
8,0
16.0
2.5
584.3
1.25
278.2
TST-B
306
351.1
8.0
16.0
2.5
584.3
1.5
369.2
TST-C
198
419.0
8.0
16.0
2.5
584.3
1
200.5
TST-D
180
215.2
8.0
16.0
2.5
584.3
1
200.5
TST-E
720
1585.6
16,0
44.0
2.5
1610.3
1
866.5
TST-F
360
792.8
8.0
30.0
2.5
871.3
1.25
472.9
NOTE:
COLUMN No. 1:
BASIN DESIGNATION (SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN)
COLUMN No. 2:
FROM PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS (SEE FIGURE #1)
COLUMN No. 3:
FROM PREVIOUS CALCULAT}ONS (SEE FIGURE #1)
COLUMN No. 4:
EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM WIDTH
COLUMN No. 5:
EXCAVATED BASIN BOTTOM LENGTH
COLUMN No. 6:
BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 7:
TOP SURFACE AREA AT TOTAL BASIN DEPTH
COLUMN No. 8:
SEDIMENT STORAGE DEPTH
COLUMN No. 9:
SEDIMENT STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED
FIGURE #4 LEXINGTON SEDIMENT TRAP

,a.
20
15
0
8
0 6
L 4
v
t
t
2
- 0.8
�° O6
c
¢ 04
0.2
0 I
MEN
H11r��\:.
H■■H■
nw�s
nn
Sim
01_
111�1
1�I�'■��11,1
5 10 20 40 60
Minutes
Duration
Figure 8.03d Rainfall intensityduration curves —Greensboro.
21
1
V
0.
0
2 3 4 6 8 12 18 24
Hours
■■■mmmmm�m■■■
an
�Illnn■Innnn�.�.
5 10 20 40. 60 2 3 4 6 0 12 is 24
Minutes Hours
Duration
Figure 8.03e Rainfall intensity duration curves —Raleigh.
F1QUrzE *r5
8.03.6

1.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E. Michael F. Easley, Governor
Director and State Geologist May 15, 2003 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Hanson Aggregates Southeast
3131 RDU Center Drive, Suite 200
Morrisville, NC 27560
RE: Permit No. 29-13
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Dear Mr. Howiler:
We have reviewed the renewal application request you submitted for the above
referenced mine site. However, in conjunction with Mr. Scott Sink and Mr. Jason Watkins, of
the Winston-Salem Regional Office, the following information is needed to continue processing
your application:
Please submit a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to meet the current
trapping efficiency design standards outlined in Mr. Tracy Davis, P.E., State Mining
Specialist's memo dated April 4, 2003 (attached).
Please note that prior to land clearing and mining activities, updated mine maps with an
accurate legend or key, depicting scaled storage area of traps and basins, and all current and
proposed cuts, fills, waterways, or any other features relevant to erosion control must be
submitted to the Land Quality Section for review and approval.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -919-733-45741 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

17J
CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Howiler
Page 2
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 513.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not be met and request that
an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made
to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's
files at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kristin Moyle
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Attachment
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, P.E.

April 4, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Land Quality Section Staff
FROM: Tracy Davis, RA
State Mining Specialist
RE: Trapping Efficiency Requirements for Temporary Sediment Traps,
Sediment Basins and Rock Dams on Permitted Mine Sites
As you are aware, both the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual and the North
Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual have always
recommended that temporarysediment traps, sediment basins and rock dams be designed
to address three main parameters (see the erosion and sedimentation control design
chapter of each manual for further information):
Sediment Storage Capacity: This is the volume of sediment storage in
the measure. It is based on 1,800 cubic feet per disturbed acre per
year;
2) Spillway Capacity: This is the volume of water that must pass through
the spillway section of the measure, based on the entire drainage area
draining to the measure. For mine sites, if the measure is temporary
(up to one year life), the spillway capacity is based upon the 10 year-24
hour storm event. If the measure is ep rm�ent (one year or more life),
the spillway capacity is based upon the 25 year-24 hour storm event;
and
3) Trapping Efficiency: This is the surface area that is needed to settle
out fine particles in the water in the measure and is directly related to
the surface area of the measure. It is based on the following equation:
A = 0.01 Qre
Where Q is the flow of water from the entire drainage area
for the l0-year design storm and A is the surface area in
acres.
NOTE: if the measure's dimensions are set so that the length will be
twice the width, then the 2 year design storm can be used to set the
flow (Q) to be used to design for trapping efficiency surface area.
I�QIE� 141'N; i^�LL kti1 Z6YlG• Sll��li �t -� L�'u1y'�'

Lexington Query - Davidson County
® s
Subject: Lexington Quarry - Davidson County
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:52:24 -0400
Front: Jason Watkins [e-mail]
Organisation: NC DENR - Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
To: Kristin Moyle <[e-mail]>
CC: Matt Gantt <[e-mail], Scott Sink <[e-mail]>
Kristin,
In response to your request for additional comments on the permit
renewal application for Hanson's Lexington Quarry, permit # 29-13, WSRO
has the following comment:
1. Since this mine was previously permitted, yet no mining actually took
place, we would like to request that the erosion control plan for the
site be revised to meet the trapping efficiency design standards as
addressed in the April 4, 2003 memo to LQ staff from Tracy Davis.
Thanks,
Jason Watkins
Jason Watkins
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section 5
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
voice: [phone] ext 253
FAX: [phone]
V
U
loll 4111/03 1:25 I'M

MINING CHECKLI5T FOR ROUTING
Applicant's Name: Project Name: L i ityry�
Applic./Permit No° q !3 County: V *SOh Date Received: CI
Reviewer: YiAA,cqle River Basin Name:
❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Partial Release VAJ60tional Information ❑ Fee Needed: $
❑ Fee Received: $
'ra
PlrasrrOOoumt>, entire. applion �ackagr t2
W'Spri Regional Office (2 complete copies; attach the "LQ5 Regional _
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach bDib the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy; send both copies to the Regional Engineer)
Date: Poutedij cc Id
❑ Division of Water Resources Date: Routed c'd
❑ NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ U5 Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Reed
r
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
Please ro , , first 3 pages of the apPlication
and
any location
5=
Reed.
❑ Division of Parke & Recreation
Date:
Routed
❑ NO Geological Survey Section
Date:
Routed
Reed
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History
Date:
Routed
Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑Other.
Date:
Routed
Recd_
**5uepen5e Date for Commente: L14943 (no later than 25 days
from receipt)
Pleyya--se note the following:
.let. i, `r11 ii.. �n. A1nA M e1.4- i
N A
:.00A4n�..)'sfrirL.:o�A mc;e.Walix ns4"rf a15;� jPY �`'k1H,w.Kz#'.k. iuw_°.:Sci4�vi

April 1, 2003
Ms. Kristin Moyle
Assistant State Mining Specialist
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612
Re: Mine Permit Renewal
Lexington Quarry (Davidson County) - Permit # 29-13
Dear Ms. Moyle:
mon
Emn
°"Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
3131 RDU Centel Diiw
Suite 220
Morrisville, North Cir lice 27560
Tel [phone]
Fa. 919 360 2616
APR p 2 2003
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc. wishes to provide your office with the
additional information that you requested by letter dated November 26, 2002 in order to
complete your review of our application for renewal of the mine permit at the Lexington
Quarry (Permit # 29-13).
Enclosed you will find two copies of a drawing, Site Plan SP-5, showing the
proposed locations for seven monitoring/observation wells as set forth in a hydro -
geological report prepared by Philip M. Brown and submitted to DENR in 1991 as part of
the original mine permit application for this quarry.
Also enclosed please find an updated chart showing the acreage to be affected
at this site during the life of the permit. These numbers have been generated by
measuring the acreages shown on the mine maps and differ somewhat by category from
the numbers originally supplied with this permit renewal request. In addition, the "other"
acreage is deleted from the chart, indicating that 92 acres is expected to remain as
buffer during the life of the permit. The total affected acreage, less this "other or buffer
acreage, remains the same as the original permit, i. a., 66 acres.
We trust that the information provided is sufficient; however, should you require
any additional information, do not hesitate to contact the writer at 843-658-3397.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Steve Howler, P.E.
Environmental Manager SC/NC
Enclosures

s
9
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that
acreage of tailings/sediment ponds, stockpiles, wast
roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect o
proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the
similar to the following will be acceptable:
e
f
clearly lists the approximate
piles, processing area/haul
the mining operation that is
mining permit. A tabletchart
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
8
Stockpiles
3
Waste piles
10
Processing Area/Haul Roads
15
Mine Excavation
30
Other
Total Affected Acreage = 66
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO
INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN
THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN THIS
APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED
QUESTIONS✓STATEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT
ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE
MINE MAPS.

hLJ��
I
d'
..

RCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
November 26, 2002
Certified Mail
Return Recent Requested
Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
3131 RDU Drive, Suite 220
Morrisville, NC 27560
RE: Lexington Quarry
Mining Permit No. 29-13
Davidson County
Yadkin River Basin
Dear Mr. Howiler:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
We have reviewed the mining permit renewal application you submitted for the above
referenced mine site. However, the following information is needed to continue processing your
application:
1. Please provide an updated mine map including the location of
monitoring/observation wells to be utilized for static water level data.
2. Please provide a detailed calculation of the total affected acreage at the mine site.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed above
have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 •919-733-4574 I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmalive Action Employer — 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper

E
10
Certified Mail
Page 2
Mr. Howiler
As required by 15A NCAC 56,0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days from
the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are unable
to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information, in writing,
to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not be met and request that an extension
of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny
the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files at the end of the
180 day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as possible.
Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
;Sin erely,
Kristin Moyle {}
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
M. Mr. Matthew Gantt, P.E.

. 114vd: I Fwd: Icxingim quarry 29-13II �, e
Subject: lFwd: lFwd: lexington quarry 29-1311
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:50:25 -0500
From: judy wehner<Judy.Wehner ncmail.net>
Organization: DENR/DLR
To: Kristin Moyle <[e-mail]>
Subject: lFwd: lexington quarry 29-131
Dale: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:53:52 -0500
From: Matthew Gantt <Matt. Gantt r' ncmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR
To: Judy Wehner <Judy.Wehner@ncmaiLnet>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: lexin ton quarry 29-13
Date: 0 Or 2002 17- 36.12 -0500
From: co tt Sink scott.si nk@ncmail. net>
Organiza 1 DENR Land Quality
To: Matt Gantt <[e-mail]>
Matt,
Please review the comments on the Lexington Quarry Erosion Control Plan
and forward them to Judy.
EROSION CONTROL COMMENTS:
- The recently submitted
plan is a carbon copy of a 1991 plan. I feel
that this plan is
outdated and should
be reworked to current standards and quality.
�V-4
- The recently submitted
plan is not very detailed. I feel that the
measures on the
plan should be more
detailed, including showing the storage area of
�\
the traps
asins on the pians.
Also, all measures should be drawn to scale.
-^�
- The
does include detailed for\+lN
recently submitted
plan not calculations
all the
proposed measures.
should be
I feel that complete calculations and data
provided for all measures,
including the swales, traps and basins.
- The recently submitted
plan does not discuss time limits fox
groundcover. I feel
U
that the plan should
include up to date groundcover time limits.
- The recently submitted plan is difficult
to interpret at
its current
scale. I feel that
the plan should be submitted on a scale
with the limits
no smaller than
1"._= 60',
it �•
_
of disturbance clearly defined and all
measures within
these limits.
- The recently submitted plan is difficult to interpret with its current
labeling or
I nr2 l0f3US.0029'W AM

Fwd. fwdacmngtrni gtwuy 29-I311 A 0
key". 1 feel that the plan should have all the measures and
fea , as well
as current and proposed contours clearly labeled or "keyed". This
will include I
clearly showing all cuts, fills, waterways and any other features
celevani_to
ero �oatsn)
Thanks, Scott
2 of 2 IW. I12002 9:00 AM

11/20/2002 11:49 9195280
A1 o :�.
i i
i� Falls Lake Office
Date QO''OaJTV y 1c2L»
Number of pages Including cover sheet
To:
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
11421.85
From:
Phone [phone] ..
Fax Phone [phone] -

, 11/20/2002 11:49
9195280
PAGE 02
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
('h,orles R. Fit I1wood, Lxecorive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO Susan B. Edwards, Mining Program Secretary
td Quality Sectio
ow-4�—VZPama-�
FROM: aniellc R. Ponder, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conscivatum Program
DATE: 20 November 2002
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates Southeast. Inc.,
Lexington Quarry - Permit No. 29-13, Davidson County, North Carolina
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NC)AIRC) have
reviewed the subject permit renewal. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions
of the Mining Act of 1971 (as amended, 1982) (G.S. 74-76 through 74-68 15 NCAC 5).
The applicant is requesting a renewal of its current minine permit to mine metadicinic
(granite). The total permitted acreage is 158 acres. The mining application lists the mining
method as "hydraulic dredge" and "shovel and truck'. However, from our discussions with the
Lang Quality office, the method should only be listed as "shovel and truck". Tributaries of
Abbotts Creek drain the site. Abbotts Creek flows into High Rock Lake and is in the Yadkin-Pec
Dec River basin. High Rock Lake, which has a large recreational fishery and is frequently used
for swimming and skiing, has a history of water quality problems. The North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (NCDWQ) classifies High Rock Lake as eutrophic and has documented
numerous incidents of water quality standards being exceeded (NCDWQ 1998). The Abbotts
Creek arm of the lake. in particular, is subject to nuisance alga blooms, NCDWQ has determined
High Rock Lake to be `support -threatened' due to nutrient loading and the elevated percent
oxygen saturation, which may impact the fishery resources of the lake. NCWRC biologists
found an increase in the number of diseased fish in High Rock Lake during a 1999 spring
electrofishing sample. During the spring spawn, white bass migrate up Abbotts Creek from High
Rock Lake almost to US 29 in Rich Fork Creek. NCDWQ indicates that water quality and biotic
integrity of Abbotts Creek and its tributaries near the project area are affected adversely by non -
point sources, such as urban runoff, agricultural runoff., and sediment from construction and
surface mining sites, as well as point source discharges (NCDWQ 1998). The applicant has
indicated that stream and wetland buffer widths are delineated on the plans. However. it is
difficult to actually determine where this information occurs from the materials provided.
Mail in g Address: Divisi on of tnln nclFisheries - 1721 Mail Semce Con I er- F;t1eigfr.l71C27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]

`11/20/2002 11:49 91952809
Page 2
20 November 2002
Manson Aggregates Southeast Inc., Lexington Quarry
Permit No. 29-13
PAGE ©3
We recommend that the following conditions be incorporated into the permit to reduce
impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
In order to reduce stream impacts, while retaining some measure of wildlife habitat, we
-recommend a minimum 10046ot undisturbed, native. forested buffer along perennial
streams, and a60-foot--buffer along. intermittent streams and wetlands for the present
operation and any future expansions. Adequate riparian habitat and watershed protection
is essential to the continued survival of rare aquatic species. Maintaining undisturbed,
forested buffers along these areas will reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources, water
quality, aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area, and Help prevent
the extirpation of endangered and threatened species. In addition, these buffers will
provide an adequate travel corridor for wildlife species. ❑v'hereas, a grassed buffer,
particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer but will not provide the necessary and highly
valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers. We request that sediment and
control measures be located outside of these buffers.
2. Water -di scharges from the project site should -be proportional t6the sue of the receiving
stream so that the hydrology of the stream is not altered, and all discharges_ should comply
witENPDES-permit requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be
maintained at or below the permit requirement. High water discharge rates and turbidity
can negatively impact aquatic and fisheries resources within and downstream of the
project area.. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have nutnerous detrimental effects on
aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat. suffocation of eggs, and
clogging of gills of aquatic species.
3. We encourage the applicant to consider using seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife
in their reclamation plan; such as natives warm season grasses,. An exact seeding mixture
would need to take into account soil types, moisture, -pH, and degree of slope of areas to
be stabilized. Additionally, for relatively shallow sediment basin reclamation, we
recommend these areas be reclaimed as wetlands where practicable. We refer the
applicant to George Strader, District Wildlife Biologist at [phone] for additional
information and ideas on reclamation for wildlife.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comim-nt on this application. if we can be
of further assistance, please contact our office at [phone].
cc: Steve Howilex, .Applicant
Tracy Rice, US1"WS
V/
J
V/

11
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for�`�rv�ri
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
1 A 2002
yr . [:N:OV
��-
Soh gotc¢ai > Stiu ounty: Dc ✓ Sun
**Due Date for Comments'Eradk1-and Quality Section: •`
Air Quality Section Review: Assigned to:
Date Review Completed: Nlv V - i 7
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of air quality? f'Uy
Comments:
YES NO
Air permit required _ ✓
Air permit existing (-Permit # )
7+17F:v4
Comments: IJQU' 11p ,=..? ci✓i rlit QSA2.1i�-1 � =✓n,;
�[p.y)G-i"!n(i'4-- Yea c20 Lou-L .
Approved by:( k%-Cyy.J�pate.,/\lu✓. 0�-P00�--
9199

u
O
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Project: >Ll�lz-15(w r/!7'�/j LlJ f%�County:
"Due Date for Comments Back to Land Quality Section: "
Water Quality Section Review: Assigned to: /✓E5 11114E
Date Review Completed: i oz
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of water quality?
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: As,?o7r� 944S5 C
NPDES permit required
NPDES permit existing
YES
C�(Permit# )
NO
— i✓GCOz�z�l� �
Nondischarge permit required _ ✓
Nondischarge permit existing _ (Permit #_)
:��
` `� n oa - etlands disturbed
-E oao. �� �p
t ns Qeo� 401 Wetland Cart. required bb L`0.A6
At,iW�co oft�wtrt�o � Pq ,F L.i c_i1Ary �S �.
q S1TY ViS�T� CkNN�T "0 1 WoU to P,r- SEC V2 c0 5.
�- Approved by //.0'I�L Date: ri s oz
5r =,
ASSIGNED TO
n DUE DATE

0
a
j�A_
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of W er Res ourc
Ovember , 2002
MEMORANDUM
Michael F. Easley, Governor
TO: Ms. Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary Il -
Land Quality Section
FROM: Blake Rouse
Water Allocation Section ;
Division of Water Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Lexington Quarry — Permit No. 29-13
Davidson County
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
John N. Morris, Director
Please find attached a copy of the mining permit modification and transfer
request for the above referenced project.
Lexington Quarry located in Davidson County ;will not be commented on,
until question 3 c, of Section C - PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
of the mining permit application has been answered more completely. TheGt`
following points are in question :
- Stafe-whether'the proposed mine locale (neighboring private
residences) is served by a public water system or private wells:
Any water withdrawal will be subject to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.22H; Registration of Writer Withdrawals and Transfers Required. Any
person who withdraws in one day 100,000 gallons (70 gpm) or more of surface
water or ground water in North Carolina is required to register the withdrawal
with the Division of Water Resources. A Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use
Area permit must be obtained from the Division of Water Resources if the
withdrawal exceeds 100,000 gallons per day and occurs in Beaufort, Carteret,
Craven, Duplin, Edgecombe, Greene, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Onslow, Pamlico,
Pitt, Washington, Wayne, or Wilson County.
If you have further questions please contact the Division of Water
Resources at [phone] or send correspondence to 1611 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh NC 27699-161 1.
1611 flail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
Phone: [phone]t1 FAX: [phone] I Internet: wvivi.ncviater.org
An ECuBi Q�rccr.- c7 ! AIlir na i;? Action E,��,ployer - 50;'; Fle-ya-�j'ti 101,, Post Cons.:rner Pacer

• 1 f r p��sry.-.• �nI
f fI TC
A7LAOCT
7
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources"�lI�ONOFWAI'L;KL,�uuK(ZS
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Acting Director and State Geologist
October 25, 2002
MEMORANDUM
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water oResources
FROM: Susan B. Edwards IL/
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Lexington Quarry - Permit No. 29-13
Davidson County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having an
unduly adverse effect on potable groundwater supplies (G.S. 74-51 (2)) or groundwater quality
(G.S. 74-51(3)). Please respond by November 19, 2002 so that we may complete our review of
this request within our statutory time limits.
Any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on potable
groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to have any
recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality.
f your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the
person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of
your comments to the person noted in the application.
PLEASE RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH
YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matthew Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 •919-733-4574 / FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Eoual O000rtunity 1 Affirmative Action Emolover — 50% Recycled 1 i0% Post Consumer Paper

MINING CHECKLI5T FOR ROUTING'
Applicant's Name:
1n 1�TT�Project Name: i nr"CIYV
Applic./Permit No.:xri3County: Ihkjj Date`Received: ID a5 0
Reviewer. River Basin Name: ` ( i
❑ New Renewal ❑ Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Partial Release Ll Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed: $
YFee Received: $ D.00
19 m, Reglonal Offlee (2 complete copies; attach the 'Lo9 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach bath the &and
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy: send both copies to the Regional Engineer)
II Date: Routed
�txY ec'd
p Nrvision of Water Resources Date: Routed Rec'd
C Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed .�YGRec'd
❑ US Fish &Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
Please mute first 3 paQes of the application and any location map.5 to;
❑ Division of Parka & Recreation Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed Reed
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑Other: Date: Routed Rec'd
** u5peii5e Date for Corn rrlent5: (no later than 25 days
from receipt)
Please note the following:
Enir Uall NC I%f.Ulet.l
taukis I.
i
. tl.�4.+M�L'kOtw�`lL4i M[Ai'i)1luNhn 't'. e�Ja l'._da Ti�M1..btvM1tl.ae:r3f.'.wiY_Ja1Lnt A4�lh.:u�mr.nu_..ua..u�Is..Tu.o. KLl4 v..ru... ... �.._b

fA
NCDENR -
North Carolina; Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Acting Director and State Geologist
MEMORANDUM
Land Quality Section
October 25, 2002
TO: Ms. Danielle Pender
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Susan B. Edwards St_
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates Southeast Inc.
Lexington Quarry - Permit No. 29-13
Davidson County
I
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by
November 19, 2002 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control
measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater
fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and
time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly appreciated.
Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at [phone] if you have any questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matthew Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 •919-733-4574 I FAX: [phone]
512;North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Ecual ommunity 1 Affirmative Aciion Errolover — 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paoer

I
NCDENR -
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Land Resources
� Land Quality Section
James Q. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Acting Director and State Geologist October 25, 2002
MEMORANDUM
Natural Resources
Michael E. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology, Group
Division of Water Resources
I 1
FROM: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Lexington Quarry - Permit No. 29-13
Davidson County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having an
unduly adverse effect on potable groundwater supplies (G.S. 74-51, (2)) or groundwater quality
(G.S. 74-51(3)). Please respond by November 19, 2002 so that we may complete our review of
this request within our statutory time limits.
Any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on potable
groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to have any
recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality.
If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the
person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of
your comments to the person noted in the application.
PLEASE RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH
YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any',questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matthew Gantt
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 •919-733-4574 I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Eaual O000rtunily 1 Affirmative Action Emolover -- 50% Recvcled 1 10% Post Consumer Paoer

•
October 21, 2002
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612
Re: Mine Permit Renewal
Lexington Quarry (Davidson County) - Permit # 29-13
Dear Ms. Wehner:
■ ■ ■ Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax B43 537 4871
rib
d
0CT 55 2002
DENR
LAND OLIAUTY SECTION
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc. wishes to provide your office with information
required for the renewal of the mine permit at the Lexington Quarry (Permit # 29-13).
Enclosed you will find five sets of permit renewal drawings, five copies of the
completed mine permit application, and a check in the amount of $500.00 to cover the
permit renewal fee. The sets of permit renewal drawings each contain the following
individual drawings:
Cover Sheet
C-1
Site Plan
SP-1:SP-5
Mining Plan
MP-1:MP-4
Cross Sections
MP-5
Erosion Control Plan
EC-1:EC-4
Erosion Control Details
EC-5:EC-6
Channel Profiles
EC-7:EC-18
Landscape Plan
LP-1:LP-4
Landscape Details
LP-5
Reclamation Plan
RP-1-RP-4
Please note on the permit application form that we are changing the permanent
address for the receipt of official mail to the new North Carolina Area Office in
Morrisville. Please address all future correspondence concerning this permit to that
address to the attention of the writer.
We trust that the information provided is sufficient-, however, should you require
any additional information, do not hesitate to contact the writer.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
GG!-
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Environmental Manager SUNG
Enclosures

mom
:a:Hanson Ez<nn
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST. INC.
I DOCRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SURE IRCO VDID AFrER 6D DArE'61759
TUCKER, GEORGIA MIR
TTD 03}31,79.H L; �.Fyazje fryy e�!ryy..
PAY .3:: r:.�z ..::z? J 0 s�^� �i!{i lam= octs DOLLARS
pAtE
70 THE ORDER OF
CHECKN0.
!`XWDUHT&
AMOUNT
5001
MELON BRNK RA., PNILIOELPMI, PA (p]Ip)
MYABLE]NFOUGH MFLLON BRNNIpFJNA. VnIAunCipv, O[ -- -
1
0

1
NORTH CAROLDVA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION OCT Q 5 2002
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT —
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
l . Name of Mine Lexington Quarry County Davidson
Inver Basin Yadkin -Pee Dee Latitude (dd.mm.ss) 35-46.30 Longitude (dd.mm.ss) 80-15-00
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 3131 RDU Drive, Suite 220, Morrisville, NC 27560
ST6vf ryowotcit, R£
Telephone -5` - 843-921-84y
4. Mine Office Address Not known at Present
Telephone Not known at present
5. Mine Manager Not known at present
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature G(.J Date 2GX 2—
Print Name Justin E. Williams
Title President
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G. S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grantor deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt ofa
complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days fallowing the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
-1-

• 0

i
t
❑ NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation or the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that 'apply:
1. a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:_ Acres
leased: Propefty owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: 29-I3 Total
permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal' fee will be based upon):
c. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mmi mi g permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered y the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: i Total permitted acreage:
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes— No—. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage that
the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modificationinvolve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete afl of Section F. of this application form
entitled Notification o Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes No� (if no, a "minor
modification" fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to
be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
d. If this is an application !for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered y Me existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage:
❑ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED ,PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Metadiorite
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck Shovel & Truck
X Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain}
-1-

0 0
.!!ILL 1.
-.ldl i3'_ iv '..,E r, •.I r. ) ;;f'.I: tt ! ! ;,; ,vc .ft.: �! L'. :a.!CF 014. ,1 i .t J! .ri a; s,�-rn;>
t i'Efl i F 'fA%.P I?
rr .i.:J JF
':5 e I:9L,
L. J:. c .1 S,ti" 6t -P ,. ? "j;L' -itii it r
... ..
-..Cs.•f...{ IV•;' 1,..1 !i' .')YL-Jb YI. ..:::I i_ 511191j
i i*.
__..._
. -
:.:'.-;DA1 .Ji..'::- J':1:' �:'If ../'I. f- 1(: -. i .'JI:f , :.t: j...
I FC. iA,
to Ifi.'.:1
'. IJ t.('i....
fa:!(�I La %l E- t°, Yn L.,L"l fi ll:?In tl i313 ,
;if 1
f f 1(
if 1
C {1,:� It `ai L. f.13 L..p.C{ly. Irrte
LI r
%iIL e,:,.. .-1
,Yit
•.:F it
�'-II .t �.. .:;.. ,; r, r+ITl .:i Ar *�f,l -i -F ,.;-..p-,,, lw- ;H'i .
..,
71ILI
-41i .
IIifii r' 1 1 "'aff I t 1 ,., tLfii'�'. Il L I ,q: IIR1. L 3g1'1?
i.!•I tp�l '1j Ct '?.i IiLii .i(i: J, 9ai 2.JOC
.:::CI,
jjI'f
r.... .. t . Y:'. r I _r:IF.., L 3if:bifJ+a L r y
11 .1'ii
?rii, }I,q.Ir
I /f ;'a:j l,I!'i ti :� '. ..:)lip;; tl f d ,
.:-d'Ipi:
It ll,,.
- 'J . ,
.);!!r'
IL .,I I
! Lp4
I:%:I :...:I:It I i .I .... i.: `Jf�l).
1•.lb;'!'
('j.
-1! ::Ln9 i f LLWi fl l„r. i.'i I ) FIJIilly
yt,
if_r. r,3 If
, (, ?., i -!r h ! )J..t.. `,.t I .6. (!
...
,, vpt.
'.
IF ......nr': it .i 'iL ;. i .. .,.,,., It.) J,�fl ... _ ,n:6f; f4
'�?4L irLI ,. 1! rd.A=i
...:,. ..:., ..:.... IF t....I
.I.1'e sp .%t Y;. ';ti r..,i.i>i'S'. C. r. :Ce-:' j S:X:
.E.l
;'_..'�;( l_`t;F. r1a"•i:d#I

r�
0
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 300'
Depth is relative to what` benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
Natural Ground Level
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 300'
5. Has any area(s) at this site been rained in the past? Yes No X
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted?
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10 years
B. MAPS
1. Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six b copies of a 7.5 minute quadrangle
and a county highway map. These maps, in addition to six(6) copies of all mine maps and reclamation maps,
must be submitted with each permit application.
I
7.5 minute quadrangles may be obtained from:
N.C. Geological Survey
NCDENR
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
(919) 715-971 S
County highway maps,may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
+ [phone]
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits can
only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps must be
of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, at a
minimum: `
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limns of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
gg Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location and
distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.

1�p it IIf 'iq!r lilt ler
I - - ,WAl .t'i lr.r.
_.r
.'k: Mr : .'Ini ,h L Yril ! .1:'•.! Yr flI ,f.. ''t it,::.:, :...';Y
...J ili:: v:!,1r.s 'r.r e. l.a'I: e: f!n:l:,•,l
'. ii•tit I 1!J Iif; l' E;l'f. )b.,.. Aft in Y. .. .1.:i(. LfliCi
It1 : i!It It, , !-1 ..e Ii!fr ;; 14 tit3,4jY.l>71f IsiSf!
;•,13' 1L d, 4 1 p 7f I A
..:. _.. rM1 :ilJ Y�.f . G .i t! f $.: it i1 s;i3 ,Ri t'tl!, i9l;!l.tnS ad 9i+].:f ,, ]z� :N:11, Y,i;Or1
1 ....,i..l PL ,:r :.I. liv'. r.: <'1 ra e L:'r..i'-:'f'. .. _... :
::1!1 ii'+it 40
L•A. ,;"-d 1 � a � .,�_ ,f fl'� {t. (-: t. F. 11': �'Jt. r, !o ,. I. :1'Jy V,I .,
!Ail iII
it; it
It ],1'e eta":-•Ir$G:i ;!
1.'
A' : I i, .1 i ::: t o J
it
it
`�

i
f �
M.
n.
o.
9
I
Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor
of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet
of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.
Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway; creek, stream, river,
or other watercourse;'railroad track; or utility or other public right-of-way; if an adjoining tract is
owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of
record oftracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must
be provided on the mule map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel or
less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
Map legend:
i
l . Name of applicant's
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)

u
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of ta&%s/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing arrea h! aul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
15
Stockpiles
6
Wastepiles
10
Processing Area/Haul Roads
25
F
Mine Excavation
10
Other
92
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, T PS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
TMMRMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN
THIS APPLICATION FORM {PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM. i THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.

ij t
No
'I [j j
I I
t
d p

C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
i
1. Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference the
sequence to the mine map(s): Attach additional sheets as needed.
See previously approved plans and associated Construction Sequence. The sequence of development
of the mine has not changed since the previous submittal.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and Burin mining
to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for mine
excavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of installation
and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion control measures
on the mine map(s) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details of each measure.
During the life of the quarry, any cleared land not being used in the mining operation will be seeded for
pasture Within the affected area of the mine site, a series of diversion ditches (grass -lined or rip rapped)
will be constructed and maintained to channel all runoff water to settling ponds or sediment basins prior to
its release into any stream.
The sequence of construction and installation of the permanent erosion control features is included with this
application. See previously approved plans and supporting calculations for specific details. This information
has not changed since the last submittal.
1
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be used.
y
The crushed stone facility requires the use of water to produce clean stone. The water is pumped from the
secondary settling pond to the plant. Through the use of spray bars and screens the raw material is washed
and sized. This water will also be used at all transfer points throughout the plant to allay dust. Once used,
the water is collected in a series of ditches and pipes and directed back to the primary settling pond. Once
the water has flowed through the primary and secondary settling ponds, most of the silt -sized particles of
material will have settled out, and the water is ready to be reused in the plant. Due to evaporation and loss
through material sales, it is necessary to periodically supplement the closed circuit system with water from
the retention pond.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yes X No . If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge
and locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine map(s).
i
Water discharged will consist of small amounts of localized ground water encountered during pit excavation
and storm water runoff. Water from pit dewatering requires only minimal treatment at times to make it
acceptable for discharge. To insure a high quality discharge at all times, it will be passed through a settling
pond prior to discharge. Storm water will be suitable treated using BMP's such as sediment traps and basins
prior to discharge.
I
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
Yes X No . if yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X
No . If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells?
Estimated withdrawal rate in gallons per day: . Locate all existing wells on the mine
map(s) that lie within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any
conclusions or statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and
current water withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public
water system or private wells.
From analysis of the core retrieved from the exploratory drilling, the metadiorite will
to have very little
primary permeability. The only means in which water may be transported will be through secondary

•
•
--
r
.l
a
�
4
i
It
mI
—
a
c
rr.
a
e
tI-
tI
tow
It
It
—41
LI
It
_
7
II
It
tI
r.
ti
C
It
I

permeability (i.e. joints, fractures, shears, etc.); however, from core analysis, RQD values are in the 85% to
95% range, below the weathered rock interface, and these joints and fractures do not appear to be
interconnected. The surfaces of the fractures and joints show very little evidence of mineralized coatings as
a result of water transportation. Removal of the overburden has very little effect on shallow wells in the area
since the pit for the most part sits on a topographic high and very little of the recharge area for shallow wells
will be disturbed. The overburden materials in the pit area are silts, clays, and sand, which would inhibit
groundwater migration. I
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.)
from the Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to
register water use with the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than
100,000 gallons per day ond. needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if
the operation lies in a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
This site has been issued an NPDES General Permit to discharge pit water, process water and stormwater.
Permit # NCG020204
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions?
Yes X No I . If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality
permit issued by the Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
Lexington Quarry has been issued an Air Quality Permit by the Division of Air Quality. Permit # 7417R
E
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
A wet suppression system for the plant, as filed with the Division of Air Quality, will be the primary control
for fugitive dust in the plant area. Spray bars and nozzles at transfer points in the processing plant allay any
particle emissions in the plant and stockpile areas. Also, most aggregate products will be washed stone
gradations with little or no fines. Haul roads and site access roads are also monitored for fugitive dust. As
the need arises, a water wagon will spray water along these routes to further inhibit any dust from becoming
airborne.
a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-of-
way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedunentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions. Note
that all buffers must be, located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will$e maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary
or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a wider buffer
may be needed depending on site conditions. Show all buffer locations and widths on the mine
map(s).
It is anticipated that no mining or land disturbing activities will occur within 50' undisturbed buffer zones
around the property lines. This site is completely wooded and it is Hanson's intent to maintain as much of
this wooded natural area as possible in passive buffer area. This is not to in any way inhibit Hanson's right
to use the property outside of the 50' Undisturbed Buffer Zone.
Since the entire site is wooded, Hanson is malting efforts to preserve the natural areas as much as possible.
The buffer around the property lies will be maintained by trees instead of visual barrier berms to screen the
operation from our neighbors. ;
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet may
r

1.... ... st3t :f lf.:l.J- Pu.f. dJv r:$r• r1 .")p1' {!.:dr+
s :aiJ.}I .d:,i: r! rj,.J,'i i.L :'fi .90'rL-{.;'_•.It
-.•t '. 'i
✓. I) v,,l97., 1 . 't.' .a:)i,} l.x tl fit i' r I lj tI I. It
Jfa „• .6; ar
••y:•ys s, .Ir, ,1% .!. 1 -21 .O . lrYIYt: !It, fe• .1.1.3'N ,Li°.:r .I .14'Ir
di•d-a:::J ,,.63 .rrF ti,+ ,. J ; ;; tt I Ilo rrr r ! , , .l y,;i ; J t....:.ifs It a - '., ';It .c; , f - .t=; 'wl 4, ! . r , :ali::
;:{+P:6i u;vty r.j..i.riF .61'-: :ra:. 1. '.r1.Y r..r• a: fs±l': , !.., ,: ,F..q 6.n:'t;h lIf" ,l .;. J!ij;:
.dn;;rr;;il:+'.44U„•:.i v!'Tr.
'• ! r :.::::: 11 id;';.;i _-f I—,M, .: l' :. ., . t6t; : it ... .r.:it! I
"Jl, :t..t. e. - of d -.4 y5a h r '..U(•r:.: r'+y rI <- P'/t 1..1
';, ":; i)I, i .. . ,'.F. tlr Il'Y �. !1'L IpJ i ,:j!;! i); xi Ii
�.�, ... r 1±.:.1 "1.-::.j': 's:: ,'.-.:. lA'..i R i , 1'J!.. Jai 6tir•, _r :I o"JL: '. --J �jt..
I
xr-I': i3sL, kLkill •f Li .7„ib. )1r3'. ad:t_e,liF
i:' 1 ('t., ';:34 Ik .i:l;£)f."ircJ1 Fs; fit if j :zi I '
!18t�1 1 I ': li;#'!: t - !. ,11 r1g J)' :i Ir:? ❑'.J.' s :!;GL 'r •i! 9'% ! rJ i ..
t }.; I, .t .;i) I, ji IF r Zia"s J jib Jr f I er
ri +n 1-- li 1. i- !: Fy:'('J9� I'. »Ro`; 'J, 1 V,i '{%'. iug leli A'wri: r t P.4 t 'i rxiA 9.f
v . 1C t.-i ,.f .
,
lle:r} ;6 :6! rl It, Is li .:.. n, rr'wr7 .31 lI i.Jl .I .lr
x. I s
a,)Jtit ! ,..ix,t DI It+. u,t.l ,it I:1I ib it it it R itnf; t=x!r ;I Ptns!. ]?v tc11L
'I+iUI> 1154; f? St? 11I,{'. .11 .'i! ..}, 'Y )r i0 n.. E .'•:. '. M. 9t.'-. l'11t. !If rfi:-.. a!1!'n ,1[1,; si if i;l?
u: ir.+t>. !•Jr. .I. f, it, 114. ..,.Il i!r. r.: ::x 1. W, f, l56n :x sr;d fctt 10 31 fali ill! ,'r n 114114
;ti l'.5p} i ln:'li UIIS.., ,.i. .-If .eil .ti 1. :an v,..: ni ,.1 int.. lk u., ,,;1f ! 3 ,.,li if v)..KY•e?+E-!1,i•
:1' '.ntr'.p,' a n-.•� It "it 1: ; i., n; I.tan: Jri i u.-A(fi', : i.':;r, is it ...
LS Pn'% ) J ::.. '; -.:+L:U" r ; .. t•)v:. ". i, "!r 1: Jb:Jrn, _! 41 :] ,.G;. ': 't^
. JJ. aQ':t .ti :: R. ,.] .: .i. wlt;I ):i .:!..-qf1',; 1 >IlULr'
.i O:'j r: I,).:( J: t., 11 11 11?.,) •,v ,i t h,.: Atli^ .A , ) r 1s,fl?! -^.11tP
:;[p r'r. L . w • a'it }i IIIr�l',r.Jl. ! l:, :KtL
':r':r.: •.•( li sr, •., (. 1 L1P: ; f k.:: _f t Fill ✓ . i-A 1 .Llatr� i! Sri . . ! -{'el IF
Ill I t is it... :: ., .r. ..,, . _'JRe[to rniJ ,nrJ ..,.; •. '! :! r:•.
?'mnfls'$'; I/..r;1ii,'!..;.lf.it1 r ;,., L.. r..°,r„a>:P:Itt!^.liJYi66'u.j-.:6fttilo'6 iu'liq Ilinf. !.i
i:;k?51. 1111; iji
f' ,IlZ nt! .ri:. 1, l?i i)[n Sa:S IIY£t .!t-:!sl Gill :i +15 et 0: ,rlrt! p .J:rpn:; ri,£., .. R:
!:!}li'r.• I6n..:11; ii?'rJ' f I. N: -r.. lil it ,:,u •:�1 u41 it tfif[ S'l .hi!ti.3{.L.r(S;:C l; S ° :.H l.: !N!,(rl-. aii
tr:`I?. t 1 itia. ft!t'1!,
a ,1LI 'I !`::'. d:r 1::.. is L:If iwl Ikli It i.0 I (I rIi 1v.Fit t il.i tim:..,i RF; it zbfla( ( Itd9Y;!S i in.+r;
i;3? as•:.r rs-vri ua::,r+halm+ 4 .-:-:ui ... in (1 -: ai; .6, -.I; it, 't'f . ,.tRirw. if :nr:ti; uR if
`;'li Jui 1' I dh,f..Y!• I.P :i!I:r I iit 1 i&}'fit 1 'A t ! a':::I,rt ail I r f!
.; t.i.zff 11 ' 1 1. ),j it,. J J 1 r. If ;!!(I :;r IJP.
. 1.. ..:II .. o '.t;:rn.'. 1 ,i!17...1! .rj IU - .s. ulf 6-a)' +?[Lr:,t

i
be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within the
mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all buffer
locations and widths vn the mine map(s).
All water courses, impoundments and associated buffers are delineated on the plans. See attached plans for
specific information regarding buffers to be maintained.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and minimum
3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required, unless technical
justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
In order to prevent landslides and/or slope failure adjacent to adjoining properties, cut slopes will be graded
on slopes no steeper than 1 '/:: 1 and fill slopes no steeper than 2:1. In addition, all slopes have been seeded
as soon as possible after grading has been completed and will be treated in accordance with the revegetation
plan contained herein.
Furthermore, as previously stated in 5a, buffer zones of varying widths will be maintained in areas of existing
vegetation, and no mining shall occur within 50 feet of existing property lines.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s) for all fill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburden disposal
areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any benches andlor
slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the method of fi al stabilization.
See attached mine plans for generalized locations. For more specific details see previously approved plans
and details.
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes including
specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be provided on the
mine map(s).
The maximum slope within the pit excavation will 1'f : 1 in unconsolidated overburden with a 15 foot wide
bench every 35 feet and a 25 foot bench at the overburden / rock interface
d_. In hard rock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -sections
of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety benches and
mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
The expected slope will be 1'/4 : 1 which is used at many other operations and has proved to be successful.
Slopes will have a 15 foot wide bench every 40 feet of depth.
See attached mine plans for generalized locations. For more specific details see previously approved plans
and details.
1
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
To prevent any physical hazard to neighboring houses, no mining will be conducted within 800 feet of any
dwelling or building. Likewise, no mining activities will occur within 900 feet of Kimberly Drive or within
1600 feet of interstate 85.
Prior to quarrying, a preblast survey'wi11 be conducted in and around neighboring homes to determine the
pre -exiting structural condition of those dwellings. Once quarrying has begun, all quarry blasts will be

bJr, •a;rrl:i+` :n. I, fin ::ty :r:;r:l I rtu;; •;;.:P.;;a :j;: :: jifa :+' ,III cr. ;i if:'I r:,-I❑i.. yr I., Ir 61cIf' ::pj rt if *.I 1.i p;a,tr ,.':a ur
.f'. iuk t - u...., :6' i.,:i;i . e:i •.i u+it I^ i''', '41.6 .x J ria 16. I;1 ;jr :.< I JG
If ;tII F r... •.. F- •B10f nriv;iI .':SI ❑ .bVla ,y" !W, V •:J t.t.
0 t. 1�:-t.rt Ftl ,;:Il%•t I I i if 4 lie �, rlf5lt 3i.{ fN' Il. _. s. t;; t siev t7 Jtlu i:::•tit:If.: .'.
'if•+. JV1 11. 1, 9t 1, 1 if;-, t If _ . , ...1
tn47111 )f s 1 I I. r9:. Yli• { 1f.' I[ 1 1 f I l":
... 1:h f�4 r:9 ti:'
a ! +:.t.ror. 1,'. pn ist _ ..t..iS ;,;r..r F'. fr t:.n. tl .c •`dj[ +1..' n:, . t J - I . N I
r:.rwr_•mlr Na; .:+le LIr. It,Cs1J .,r.:.ii pisif 4:i.%J: i:l
f :!•' : << `t,..'+ t tf*.j.N t 111 I ;: ....:'.I. 4 =dl r1 7 i Lit';
I .. 'f'•, f
fj
�•,;tckJ rrrl i:E _L• :+nx el .it ::f the ' ?.q:'.-' r J . x!'r..::r :'
uff '. : t f.: C., 131'. C r..l. ..lW f eglit j.. t c -r... i `1'4: 0: u. it 'r,: l: n
Lr,:: t _
:b; ;. t .l[ .•1( -,' ,. ,:
f . •.. ; ,: „ ' A 7,j:.;.:l:..
. ,�. .,np ,
.'.' 1'P
{6c-it 'oa.t:r!+f•e[t- 7e' .1{n4tj y: c;. :I t6 .,.5%f III
: ii.::(
1%: ali: ! :r.::.t j'f III.
F t)i.: r• .... .I :. :.
r 1 : �i. ...+
1 : �.:+�yl. ..4!
+j r1i CV. • l:if to -' .Hi '4`
.'II 4
fi:t:
I:frf jjf
iff
..!dill;!f
J i 1
1}
7r '. 1'LIISF`
t t. 'r: T 0'
�JS fx ). t'fV❑ I; If
S-i'
"'I 7fCI
V I3•'1
1 1 3 1 - {F
it fj 1 {. ht f!
f; TI 3 y i 9 11{
z if
J.' J I If{
.I
.: te. .i ..t::`1
t! ..I
•R+t. G,.- will if;
:j.hld i La'J:1.: \t f, 4t F•If
III,rift.
!'•
if
!pl+
d 'l1: .5
lij Zi I i U
rii.',a IIIi I{.. .,.:.:.I t It, fl-'.
...
1;:

0 0
monitored with a seismograph to insure that peak particle velocities and overpressures are within local, state,
and federal guidelines.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
During the life of the quarry, barricades of either oversize rock or concrete barriers will be used and relocated
as the pit is developed. Access to the property will be restricted by gates that are locked when the quarry is
not in operation.
These barricades will be established prior to commencement of mining operations and during the stripping
of the pit before the stripping depth exceeds ten vertical feet.
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes No X How will acid water
pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or other
measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map(s) and provide cross -sections
through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
Since the site is completely wooded with hilly terrain, no visual barrier berms will be necessary. We will
maintain a well -screened vegetative buffer, which will keep the entire operation from public view.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? if so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
No publicly owned park, forest or recreation areas adjoin the property.
11. Will explosives be used? Yes X No . If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and
describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring property
from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations. Depending on the mine's location to nearby
structures, more detailed technical information may be required on the blasting program (such as a third -
party blasting study). Locate the nearest offsite occupied structure(s) to the proposed excavation(v) on
the mine map and indicate its approximate distance to the proposed excavation.
I.Ensign Bickford or comparable nonel initiation system
2. Anfo premixed powder for dry hole shots.
3. A cap -sensitive high explosive emulsion for wet holes and initiation of Anfo.
4. An electronic initiation system may be substituted for the nonel system if it is deemed a better overall
system.
Since blasting is an integral part of this operation, each blast will be monitored with a seismograph to ensure
that peak particle velocities and peak overpressures are within limits established by local, state and federal
authorities. A recording of each blast will be made on magnetic tape and will be sent to a third party
consultant for analysis using the Response Spectrum Velocity Profile (RSVP) technique.
Prior to any blasting on site for production purposes, a preblast survey of all structures within 1,000 feet of
the pit will be conducted by a third party consultant, such as Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc. During this survey
Vibra-Tech will attempt to allay some of the public's concerns regarding present-day blasting techniques.
As an additional precaution, some preliminary seismic studies will be conducted onsite to determine the
preferred direction of blasting and pit development to further lessen the possibility of excessive peak particle
velocities during the actual mining conditions. A brochure from Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc., detailing their

0
0

0
proposal, is included as supplemental information to this permit application.
12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill. Indicate
the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Onsite storage of gasoline, diesel fuel, and various oils and greases is necessary to facilitate the operation of
various types of equipment needed to produce crushed stone. The bulk storage tanks for fuel, gasoline, and
oil will be in approved above ground storage tanks surrounded by a berm that would contain any leakage
or spillage. Grease and other oils not required in bulk quantities are stored in Si -gallon metal drums
generally under cover on concrete slabs or at the oil separator pit. All empty grease and specialty oil drums
are returned to the manufacturer at frequent intervals to alleviate the need for a disposal area.
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or establishment
of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. This
information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with the information
provided on the mine map(s). In addition, design information, including typical cross -sections, of any
permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the location(s) of all permanent
channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Reclamation of disturbed area will be an integral part of the active quarrying operations. As areas are
disturbed, revegetation will be in accordance with the Revegetation Plan. Please refer to the initial
reclamation plan found in the reclamation section of the plan sheets.
The plant site and shop yard will also be raded and revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan. The
primary and secondary settling ponds wi, be filled in and treated in a like manner.
The quarry pit itself will be allowed to fill with groundwater and rainwater and can be used to provide water
storage and recreation for the local area.
7. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes X No
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed body(s) of water. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site. Will the body(s) of water be stocked with
fish? Yes No X If yes, specify species.
Although the body of water will not be stocked with fish it is anticipated that a fish population will develop
within a few years due to natural process of fish egg transportation.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
As a safety precaution, a 15-foot wide safety bench will be leis for each 35 feet of bench height in all final rock
slopes. Additionally, a permanent fence will be erected around the pit to prevent unauthorized entry. Danger
signs will be placed at regular intervals around the pit perimeter to warn of open pit.

I dr,
1. f.fr`IfI f I f Cfl:Irif
POW \ nt. ry3 ,.\N.11,
L I f. ;. it{ Ili 71,.Idif .., 'f S. 11-. . fife.:u: ; if 1. if 1
P
kili t'.
L.,tc5lti.. r : '.�::�
' fi •'. r: �y Vr t -Al:( OY V,19 Lkid , -r,;: ., I: _:. r H. :.q
::r r' r,u:l; WfIf!
'.. :.i
:..... drib.; .:._:L'.'.
'NS ::Je'O./::.:...f •: ,,.,;
it i del
L: :d
.l. :u .. S!!i±
�i R4../ .0 it'".. •'{i!..:SF!niP
{: �'1 Odd; .j:,
';. rj1 I i':'t . if; t
.If -.f 4'i did! t I I 1 i1t i ;_..I ..:Hi
/ if t,,.r b:.ai;
.? .tia
FII:ride': C. 1
I L•''4
L•.'I.':: i�i,
"I':11^„"
. rr.
oar 1If dis:dId-
{ 'S'{ 1.f _. i .I{, .yr u:rs: ^; P.W.
t ,,.! :,jfl u, 0. .
if I? id I k+ ,Irf *..
z l �. .,.^ , t ,v l r. .. .^,. .. , , I ;::c.,
y 0'.
,1
LK ff 5 f[
p ,.
J '•fi t,rd'! f:.t ;Sv. ap L- i."I:; Y.[ :{
ll
., ,^V -d
:._itsfk Js 1.. _.
if
if a. r.., 1)1i 13. ., L, ae! :.5. le.dd . .fJ.
.tiff:S!
.'.t_. flr.!
;it
rd; tj dI, Il Iq, 11:" I.t 1r/'. 1 µ..,\,
:'. Y. f :'li dl
did.
11..i11'l'y:
11It k1 Cif, J.lalt L • ! t rvutl .,7fd
I ..: fd
1Of
:.n11 -:j;: 1. I I.r+c I.-. 4didd i ', if T it I e Ir',,.a.:u y .11. y..did if 7 LL,\-,':.a:j M •:.
.:t"..::PI t„-' e Clai!I!, Ili .r.I fdf lZ. kil ial fr J .A'.`I:A I. If :Y.:;,'F ]ll lid
r
:I
1f., r ,.. ...;;! t. .,' f'at✓ V. 5.;';, ,:.1.. 'r ,Ir -u•,: ti I 1 l.
r:a!'r'I iY „l+s:. l..: a_. r.._.. •. �p".: L. .II{'q ,vlt r.. hr; ;"d I n -n1, ro$+.
i',.:: _ f '!).f ti'. I tl❑fell ).. f.. Id j L
...
rd
0 0

0
0
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine waste
areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for such areas
must be provided on the reclamation map.
As overburden is placed in designated areas, it is spread and compacted by dozer and hauling units. Slopes
in waste area (s) (and all embankment areas) will be graded to 2:1 or flatter and revegetated as soon as
possible to prevent erosion. Drainage on top of waste area (s) will be established to prevent pooling and
stagnation of water, and to control stormwater runoff. Final reclamation of waste area (s) will include final
top and slope dressing (if required) and revegetation according to the revegetation plan as contained herein.
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
Reclamation in these areas will occur in two stages: first, the plant and stockpiles will be removed from the
site, followed by the scarifying of these locations and revegetating according to the revegatation plan as
contained herein. In addition, any site access roads not utilized in the end use development plan will be
treated in the same manner.
The erosion control structures in these areas will also be cleaned out and left in good working condition, since
they will be incorporated into the end use development of the site.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes No X . Ifyes,
identify such roadways on the reclamation map andprovide details on permanent ditch line stabilization.
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables, or other
such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Minim Act of 1971). No off -site
enerated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without Prior written approval from the NC
apartment o nvironment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and either the Division of
Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit was been issued by DWM
for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application. All temporary and permanent
refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated on the mine map(s) and reclamation map, along with a list
of items to be disposed in said areas.
In order to comply with the Davidson County Zoning Ordinance, fuel oil storage tanks will be placed above
ground to prevent groundwater contamination. To insure against seepage from an accidental tank rupture,
the tanks will be placed inside a concrete containment area. Wall height and the containment area will be
designed in accordance with federal regulations to contain the maximum expected spill or tank failure.
Alternatively, fuel oil will be stored in double -wall steel tanks to meet federal spill control regulations.
Hanson will not dispose of any drill steel and bits, cable, and conveyor belting on site. Theses items along
with used oil, batteries, tires and scrap metal will be recycled off site by private collection firms under
contract to Hanson.

•
'np,au'lsiqsr, n=eq Ce.pill ?:, l,6, ilsi :p: ,_ L: .uklua I. _'.Jana
: s' m, ,a ji it i . ,:. ,.. I
I.:. i.._ , 1>Ir :1.1 tAi ':< I
IF
:r ip4i it i fli . .. - 11 kz -[1„ .Rif tlf' _..(:, �!.16ItIi IU If it sit U'JI:'ill l"'1: Y.em
t.It! dl .i:!• f . k Y .JC,l ,tl'. 111'I its 1, is tirL:
N,,,I t v Ihat..l6 r,}.. J. i_:ve 1 r,,rl„lo !so f;i;r as f ..yr.l! j;p elxi &I sit`f r_=:li o'I Iie
s r: it' Cia tt is:>1 z.!tir it ;I (I t-.• 'crts.2.1:i l t. it,rtue£-1...11`t: !It :, L..:..Ir!t .. ea
far:-,;. r: tl.u.t.fz tall (J;,I l.,;'.."(:. '.5:;q -,. 1. ut,-a,.+.i rl,,I, i113! tt ..:(1-.r.i}:'i v.'vt!'atiaE a r. 2suI
"fa.. r. •.Ir• 1 ');,, „)n 7.a ..._ -�1.1.:i;f,i griz�t f j.. 'dit:f: r!�" >)t ;.?:± ... ..
q I!4 III( t1 l l s 11 ..ii b III J .; .ifl)i..r _ 1 .!.I )6t .1.v'r'! 'f,(oi1T l!'Iri Ili ':%if3i1 PIi it m15 :r:F', I': t' .:ut„ ,3v
trt it .:!i II I I F91: II fACiilvAt fsb .kill if; :'.-0rfn }-a:: .. .`in.td lf) k£' ,r( 'ti^.., 1,,, +d ":'J ?41i!!a Il,
!' :rl 1)9r f..6 !1-l. ,tl rs "{,:?rf. 'blfF F.:.4:f: s { .t..:r f."")( i £,iwlq IF.
::'P6 t!far"Y..IGi.:nl::.: IJ^Rit 1
.3i{ir et ,3. ile is o,'i 1 !'. ;c fi! ['i r;"[II•.' ,!.,� .: ti:SaL .rf l.kV I I.'h t its 0 1, pit .ti.7:. 1 ili :it! :I a i s rlsi fpf 4F!"{
. .. . _. ,.. is fell! fua;'si; nisi Liwam=:ct,;::ai -ill M-: •.ri!
•':r 11, is ....'7'< , ! ' Iit! t if. J- J' 11 1 ` . .:1'JS A ! ,oil r:'. v (t f,
...,.
,LS: t,,IIL'vto.1, 1-.IlPr1:X .1 1J, p",:!
.:'. .'�J :r,.5r:. r: o :si i t I:.d: ,. ft L'Glf' "1:.1 ).':..,!r:':�....ff Jt..Ii i"..i_ .0
110 o -...I r / ..r _ I :e-it I L, I .e I;.ii.l, ( yrJ . ...rr. 'i Zvi! _...
is
tI (1 it"f.'; -!tto It tI.1,', �5:.1,tV .l''1lgI 311 1'" 1!f /tI-r'II
•., it; I t . , r. ,A,? II ... '1.'i „ M1!ii, F:! .} r. ¢PS .)..f, ?... 4. t I G. .i Y ,ill fl Igro
jr 77:5L 7ifJso ,r.k3 I ;1 1.t-.. YI, L{a,ry',fi rll+i rlIt; I ') Ili , 11.,ai or d4 i1t;:!I fit `i14�r N 11 '.
c : I .;, t , )o'.,.!'! yb r r�. tl' .a`..:ral :.l ,e).,u. Yllit: ;4I �I ft..'.H ILf f 97,r •kif r@'.
:rli�tl 1 isrYV' ., ,. :. ..n Vt al: t %Ltjj I.Illjlit,.1 ILyAltill0`Pf4,1 YI
Is Its As.
. r.uH+ l so.-..'r 'IFFI it 1it) -P,%rf: 11till r lI "I'll1...elat t ii irn rf'9aa..J naet. i'.•afS s?i rrin as7 v.ns , IIII s! es{
: A`.. I:r 1 .;L, r :iL.. ,. n411) ..ai.l M j.i F r4LY . t 1 v.F.l. J-..111r ,.: i:' t . J1p:: (. ip It f . JS9:'?':1. ": 1' :I of
:Wsl Ri.,: F! l,.lrllip; IN .aIli t I11:i RT.,f . )1 ?c/:?ill: , it %tl, ltril 1'.:,I r fi Il! e, Fit Im! 93t!
.,.pill 1A ll k i silt itr,','Ii; e:` Ili.itul is' Nml 'l ill ,.(•l:!f 1volfrit uryY! a. 1 isli wi"r, ;5aff ),Ir'J fit Ili t'_4321il!)
,asc.. r:6 ,t ,. IJ.I;a.ita's ii,u.i,Is f.r,1N„J,•iFv :_Il tsl'4 .:%3 :'t••�a'e,
!i'!' )! lisp 'Itl'!1 r--'),Ca'4i;•IG; Pl1"L'9 .'r it' low; i..: !I! S; t). IIJ3!, 'n:: .1rYi'
!. n,
.v
i „(i sl f? .In.''y .' r t, itd ]^�fl i ,:; Iii Seh:.m '_zYfu.l'u

0
0
7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must include
recommendations foryear-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and type of seed,
fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding instructions for
permanent revegetation and, if necessary, temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree
plantings is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District having
jurisdiction over lands in question;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources;
c. County Agricultural Extension chairmen or Research and Extension personnel headquartered
at North Carolina State University in the School of Agriculture and Life Sciences;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Office of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources;
f. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME — RATE OF APPLICATION: Maximum of 2 tons/acre.
FERTILIZER — ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION: 10-10-10 standard with a
maximum application of 1,000 lbs./acre
SEED -- TYPE(S) AND RATE OF APPLICATION INDCLUDING SEEDING
SCHEDULE:
See plan sheets for seeding types, rate of application, and seeding schedule.
MULCH— TYPE AND RAGE OF APPLICATION: Straw with an application rate of 2
tons/acre.
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS: See plan sheet for information.

f,.'.I() A h'142 c,rs. ',r, is lPq:n.l:r`.J :n.
:..S , _Ertl' :Y.e_t at?if; daj: F t�f`M.•.•..t y,�.;.
.;ldr,(x r'..(sl;; sat: -;Fz ar a .,,+y s r. r,;uBFt.
F qr�;.•.
'i ✓;!. 5. S ILIA:ir..`r' '}die'.S .. ,i: '. s. i.x4:', �.t.
.Y.•iV!:r1 rt:f; I; i'YIIY,.:i'�V[Ip st
a.•hJ.NAV'_{,�f it l..'f:! s, 1. .0' . i:. ' t : f
•hi x,ia sstir, ='1 t?r'rf '4'1 ,_. r.t_. :.1 ...
..
E?{jiI.r, -.. situ. V t '.FI bi.lfs.r.r¢ r+i. F11r.
'(j
-LEi'a... G'afiit is f'i i!t`.i:4i..:r,;i4tlf;f:;
ill (: iRt:.IA G.il :,) E l.y F. F t •
! i
..
,,.
it rFv a . S:j4: d I - i,d` Ir�y.: i�• , j P I L:..,tit[ Slj;
::;ii [ , -
„i'➢'
(J it<l e�Ftl I ,.JSOi Sri; IR.y41:. .dtr'?f!)F t". dF'-I
s: i r4'•i]6
'ti
r.,.,.',r.
Ilea::
!
t't:i al p,:il:a:.` l;aut o; ........
'.r
!'
l,l Iil J ri!!r.. Viz:;:(
f 't;i r n.N...d. ,. fd.4:. err r 1, n-r::f i I . :di 1 ,. ! :ar:a
:S'vr
..:'h` I.:::: il.
:.... 1:_ •: '."-:,i `.j,r r, - �.:1," .L'
;I. i
'::it f r
❑.'.. 1rl
4' Y:AdjI I:: .P.'�
f' ,'..,}•;
%.f:YV

•
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation workrheet is robe used to establish an ap, opriare bond (based upon
of $500 to $5, 000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approve
Department to be affected during the life of the mining permit Please insert the approximate acreage.
AFFECTED RECLAMATION RECLAMATION
CATEGORY
ACREAGE COSTIACRE• COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds:
Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Stockpiles:
Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Wastepiles:
Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Processing Area/Haul Roads:
Ac. X $ /Ac. — $
Mine Excavation:
Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Other:
Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.:
Ae.
(TOTAL PERMITTED AC.:
Ac.
Temoorary & Permanent Sedimentation
& Erosion Control Measure s:
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following
two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existing excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be graded for positive drainage where measures will
be needed to prevent offsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsne watercourses and wetlands.
a) Internal Drainage
Ac.
b) Positive Drainage
Ac. X $1,500.00 = $
SUBTOTAL COST: $
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: $ X Permit Life (1 to 10 years):
INFLATION COST: $
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COST + INFLATION COST = $
Total Reclamation Bond Cost: COVERED UNDER EXISTING HANSON
AGGREGATES SO S , A T BOND

11
1p
,
.. n r !!; jj .t., F ,
:...J . r

0 0
F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
Not Applicable
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
See previously approved Land Entry Agreement

North Carolina
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
March 19, 2002
Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Howiler:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your recent request to have the corporate name changed from Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc. on the following
permits has been approved:
7-29-1'3 _.«Lexington
-Quarry_-¢
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount 11 Quarry
43-03
Elliot Sand and Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand and Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton 11 Quarry
51-38
Buckleberry Sand Mine
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry'
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
page to each of y= existmln6 mining permits for future reference. The expiration date,
mine name and permit number on the permit document shall remain the same as
before this modification.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919-733-4574 1 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
�/ An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 11o% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Howiler
Page Two
G.S. 74-65 states that the issuance of a mining permit does no supersede or
otherwise affect or prevent the enforcement of any zoning regulation or ordinance duly
adopted by an incorporated city or county of by any agency or department of the State
of North Carolina.
Currently, a $500,000.00 blanket bond from Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
is on file with this office which sufficiently covers all of the present operations.
Therefore, t am returning Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. Is $500,000.00 blanket
bond to you for your disposal
Please advise this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter,
Sincerely,
Tracy E. vis, P.E., C.P.M.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, P.E.
Mr. Toby Vinson, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Bradley Bennett - DWQ
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

IOC
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
May 21, 1999
Mr. Nigel Wills, Environmental Manager
Hanson Aggregate East
Southeast Region
P.O. Drawer 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Wills:
Your recent request to have the corporate name changed from
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Inc. on the following permits has been approved:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount II Quarry
43-03
Elliot Sand and Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand and Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton II Quarry
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
Please attach this approval letter and permit rover owes to your
exi ti g corresponding mining permit for future reference. The expiration
dates, mine names and permit numbers on the permit documents shall
remain the same as before these modifications.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does
not supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance
with anyapplicable zoning regulations lies with you.
LANOCKALITT SECTION I 9,7]}4574 FAX 317II3¢07+
GEOLOOmA,. S URI SECTOR IO 191733-2425 FA X,O 191733-050C
.O.
1FM7]9aad9
FAX III 1917,58401
AN EQUAL
TlA PUMP An VE A CnoN GiwSOT,I O% PCTT-CONSU
PER" I CI

0
Mr. Wills
Page Two
It is my understanding the Mining Permit Nos. 36-28 and 41-18 will not be
modified. Mining Permit No. 36-28 has not been disturbed and a release request from
your company will be forthcoming. In addition, Mining Permit No. 41-.18 is currently in
the process of being transferred from your company to Martin Marietta Aggregates.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner
at [phone] should you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHGIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, P.E.
Mr. Toby Vinson, E.I.T.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Ms. Barbara Rote-WRC
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining Act of
1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands
and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest practical
degree of protection and restoration.

State of North Carota
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes. Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
April 21, 1995
�EHNF�
Mr. Don A. Lineberry
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
P.O. Box 13983 1
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
RE: Modification Request for Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Lineberry:
Your recent request to have the below referenced mining
permits modified has been approved. The modification is to
change the corporate name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. The following permits are now
officially issued to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry _
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount II Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton IY Quarry
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
9B-13
- Elm City Quarry
As this is considered a permit modification, please attach a
copy of this letter and the resulting permit document changes to
each permit document currently held by your company.
Please note that Nello L. Teer,Company still has two permits
that have not been included in this name change. These sites are
Permit No.30-02 (158 .Sand Pit) and Permit No. 99-07 (Poindexter
Sand Plant). Your company must immediately take the necessary
steps to provide adequate bonding for these sites or submit a
request and fee.for a coporate name change for each site.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] - [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Oppodunity Affirmative Action Employer 5a% recycladl 10% post -consumer paper

Mr.(Lineberry �.. _
Page..Two.,,::.,
Please review the modified Permit information and advise
this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
CHG/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Joe Glass, P.E.
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
Mr. Jerry Cook
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.

y -y
D E PARTMENT OF ENV=RONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RESC X3 ES
i] = V2 S = ON O F LAND RE SOURCE S
LAND QUAL = TY S ECT = ON
P E R M = T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
Lexington Quarry
_Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINE EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 2002

Page 2A of 12
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator, provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
April 24, 1995: This permit has been modified to change the
corporate name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates, Inc.

Page 2B of 12
, Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its .issuance
until November 2, 2002.

Page 9 of 12
12.
13.
14.
15.
Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
are generated outside of'the mining.permit area shall
be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that maybe considered hazardous
shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report
supplied by the Department by
reclamation is completed and
Bonding
shall be submitted on a form
February 1 of each year until
approved.
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $500,000.00 blanket bond is sufficient to
cover the operation as indicated on the approved
application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not
exceed the bonded acreage.
Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

ae)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor November 2, 1992 Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.C..
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director and State Geologist
Mr. Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
Nello L. Tear Company
P. O. Box 1131
Durham, NC 27702
RE: Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Mr. Edgerton:
The application for a mining permit for the Lexington Quarry
in Davidson County has been found to meet the requirements of
G.S. 74-51 of The Mining Act of 1971. As your company already
has a blanket bond sufficient to cover this application, I am
enclosing the mining permit.
The conditions of Mining Permit No. 29-13 were based
primarily upon information supplied in the application with
conditions added as necessary to insure compliance with The
Mining Act of 1971. This permit expires on November 2, 2002.
G.S. 74-64 states that the issuance of a mining permit does not
supercede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with any applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
Please review the permit and notify this office at (919)
733-4574 of any objection or question concerning the terms of the
permit.
Please review the permit and notify this office at (919)
733-4574 of any objection or question concerning the terms of the
permit.
Sincerely,
TL'acy Davis, E.I.T.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/se
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
Geoloy cal Survq Section Land_ QmEry Smdon Geodetic survey season
[phone] (919) 73345 4 (90) 7333836
PO. Box 276V • Raleigh, N C. 27611-7687 • Tcle honc [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Amrmmiac Amon EmplaWr

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY. SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Nello L. Teer Company
Lexington Quarry
Davidson County - Permit No. 29-13
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINE EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 2002
P,

A• ® s
Page 2 of 12
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator, provided that both operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until November 2, 2002.

• •
' Page 3 of 12
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Ouarry Dewaterino
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in
accordance with the requirements and rules promulgated by
the N.C. Environmental Management Commission.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to
the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission.
B. The permanent access (plant entrance) road shall be
stabilized with crushed stone or asphalt pavement for a
minimum distance of 50 linear feet from its junction
with SR 2237. During quarry operation, water trucks or
other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to
prevent dust from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations
promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway to prevent
sedimentation of that waterway from erosion of the
affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
/—� natural watercourse.
/ CJ The buffer zones shown on the Drawings dated June 1991
l/ and last revised September 1992 (received by the Land
Quality Section on October 5, 1992) shall be maintained
to prevent caving of any adjoining property and to
allow grading of the sideslopes to the required angle.
These buffer zones, with the exception of the
installation of required sediment control measures and
earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed.

Page 4 of 12
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. The operator shall notify the Winston-Salem Regional
Office, Land Quality Section, at least 48 hours prior
to beginning any of the initial land disturbing
activities indicated in the approved application for a
mining permit.
B. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited
to diversions, earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt
check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or
ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment
from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into
any lake or natural watercourse in proximity to the
affected land.
C.) The Drawings dated June 1991 and last revised September
1992 (received by the Land Quality Section on October
r5 5, 1992), including all supplemental reports, shall be
followed with the following additions:
1. The entire temporary stream crossing through
Abbotts Creek as indicated on the Drawings shall
consist of clean stone, not earth fill.
Appropriate information for the construction of
the bridge across Abbotts Creek, including a
sequence of construction and construction details,
shall be provided to the Land Quality Section for
its review and approval Prior to onsite
construction.
Additional sediment control measures, such as silt
fence, shall be provided and maintained at the toe
of the bridge abutments to prevent offsite
sedimentation to Abbotts Creek until a detailed
plan has been approved by the Land Quality Section
as required by Operating Condition No. 4.C.2.
above.
D. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be
submitted to the Department for approval prior to any
land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
drawings submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit. Such areas include, but are not limited
to, expansion outside of the initial mining area,
additional creek crossings, or expansion of overburden
disposal areas.
All diversion ditches/channels shall be properly
constructed and stabilized to ensure that all surface
water runoff from the affected areas at the site will
be directed to appropriate erosion and sediment control
measures to prevent offsite sedimentation.

Page 5 of 12
5. Groundwater Protection
The monitoring well program, including seven (7) observation
wells, specified in the Ground Water Survey and Evaluation
in the Vicinity of the Nello L. Teer Company's Lexington
Quarry, Davidson County, NC prepared by Atlantic Geotech
Associates dated November 1991 shall be implemented with the
following stipulations:
0All seven (7) monitoring wells shall be installed as
indicated by the monitoring well location map, Figure
1, attached to this mining permit.
B. All monitoring wells noted above shall be monitored at
least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of
consolidated material (rock) in the initial pit area to
allow for the determination of pre-existing (static)
groundwater levels.
C. All observation wells shall be drilled wells (four (4)
inches in diameter) cased into consolidated rock and
grouted to the surface. The wells shall, at a minimum,
be drilled to a depth of 125 feet. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap.
The necessary permits to construct these wells shall be
obtained from the N. C. Division of Environmental
Management, Groundwater Section.
D. The observation wells shall be monitored at least twice
a month (bimonthly) at the same day and approximate
time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months
following the installation of the wells. The static
water levels shall be measured with an accuracy of plus
or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum
point and a record of the water levels maintained. The
daily precipitation and the volume of pit water
discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these
records shall be provided to the Department on or about
the end of each month. Static water level monitoring
frequency may be increased or decreased following the
initial twelve (12) month period as deemed appropriate
by the Department.
E. To determine the water quality parameters of ground
I'AW91 water at the site, water samples shall be taken from
each of the seven (7) observation wells at the same
monitoring frequency as stipulated by Operating
Condition No. 5.D. above and analyzed for the following
parameters: iron (Fe), nitrate -(NO,), hydrogen -ion
activity (pH), hardness and color. Said analyses shall
be provided to both the Land Quality Section and
Groundwater Section of this Department for review at
the same time the above records are submitted to the
Department.
a

Page 6 of 12
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no
greater than the angle which can be retained by
vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed
slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause offsite damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices
or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the
initial pit opening shall be graded to a minimum 2
horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be
stabilized within 60 days of completion. Furthermore,
a minimum twenty (20) foot wide horizontal safety bench
shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe
of the overburden slope.
7. Surface Drainage
The.affected land shall be graded so as to prevent
collection of pools of water that are, or likely to become,
noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage
ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
I findings of any seismic studies conducted at this facility.
The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production
blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property
from thrown rock or vibrations:
In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter
otherwise provided, the maximum peak particle velocity
of any component of ground motion shall not exceed 1
inch per second at the immediate location of any
building outside of the permitted area regularly
occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or
institutional building outside of the permitted area.
Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels
linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building such as any dwelling
house, church, school, public building, or commercial
or institutional building.

•
0
Page 7 of 12
C. For the protection of nearby historical structures, the
maximum peak particle velocity of any component of
ground motion shall not exceed 0.046 inch per second at
the immediate location of any historical structure
outside of the permitted area.
D. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 110 decibels
linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of
any historical structure outside of the permitted area.
E. The operator shall monitor each blast with a
seismograph.
F. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to
insure that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where
the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by the
operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the guarded area
or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department
immediately and further use of explosive at the site
shall be immediately suspended until the following
actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation
shall be provided to the Department within 10 days
of the incident. Said report shall, at a minimum,
document the cause(s) of the incident along with
technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the
Department before blasting may resume at the site.
Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock
and repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a
violation of this permit.
G. The operator shall maintain records on each individual
blast describing: the total number of holes; pattern
of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of
holes; type and total pounds of explosives; maximum
pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records
shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and
copies shall be provided to the Department upon
request.
H. The -operator shall, when requested by the Department,
give 24 hour advance notice to the Land Quality Section
prior to any blast during a period for which notice is
requested.

Page 8 of 12
High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier (minimum of 4 feet high) consisting
of large boulders placed end -to -end, concrete median
barriers, earthen berms, or fencing (such as a woven or
4-strand barbed wire fence with 4 x 4 wood posts at
maximum 10 foot spacings) shall be maintained at all
times around the perimeter of any highwall to prevent
inadvertent public access. warning signs shall be
provided along said barrier at minimum 100 foot
spacings. In addition, a minimum 20 foot wide
horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the
junction between the top of rock and the toe of the
overburden cut slope.
B. Within the first five (5) years of quarry operation,
the entire property or, at a minimum, those areas of
high wall with a vertical face exceeding 10 feet shall
be enclosed by a 6 foot high chain link fence with 3
strands of barbed wire provided along the top.
10. visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the
mine and public thoroughfares to screen the operation
from the public. Additional screening methods, such as
constructing earthen berms, shall he employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
Tree species that will provide year-round visual
screening of the site from adjacent properties, such as
Leyland cypress, evergreens, etc., shall be employed at
the site in areas in need of additional screening.
Most specifically, in addition to the locations noted
on the Drawings, tree plantings shall be provided along
the northwest side of the haul road between it and the
adjacent Kepley property. Such plantings shall be
located adjacent to the haul road rather than at the
property boundary.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the
desire to delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the
mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit.
Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the
Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.

0
Page 9 of 12
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that
are generated outside of the mining permit area shall
be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from both the Division of Solid
Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The
Mining Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly
associated with the mining activity may be disposed of
in a designated refuse area. All other waste products
must be disposed of in a disposal facility approved by
the Division of Solid Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that maybe considered hazardous
shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
the form of a $25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover
the operation as indicated on the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be
valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.
m

Page 10 of 12
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the
performance of which is a condition on the continuing validity of
that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the
terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel
and other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle
as to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent
with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property
must be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration
which is in accordance with accepted conservation practices
and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the
land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or
remain on the mined area that are, likely to become noxious,
odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and
recommended agronomic and reforestation practices as
established by the North Carolina.Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to
the Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities
shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan,'which shall to the extent feasible provide
reclamation simultaneous with mining operations and in any
event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time
after completion or termination of mining on any segment of
the permit area and shall be completed within two years
after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule,
the planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry
excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the -top of any highwall, and grade and
revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 11 of 12
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a
surface suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden
or waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and
made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or
�� otherwise prepared before revegetation.
E/ No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the
�/ mine site. on -site disposal of waste shall be in
accordance with operating Condition 12A and B.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the
collection of noxious or foul water.
G. Any excavated channels shall be permanently stabilized
with rip -rap and/or vegetation.
3. Revegetation Plan:
The Revegetation Plan contained in the approved application
prepared and approved by Mr. Paul C. Embler, Jr., Registered
Landscape Architect, on August 16, 1991 shall be utilized.
In addition, the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission shall
be solicited for reforestation and reclamation guidance to
assist the permittee in preserving and enhancing wildlife
habitat at the site.
,�

Page 12 of 12
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to
the extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be
initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit.
Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall be
completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
Permit issued this 2nd day of November, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

o �
o
/ 1
O
00 o
o s ��
ISIS
Une
wn,rcs
1
Clry.1le'%Jng L•,1
AnM[LN Crt'ek
'trburnt VImL
2
45. NYrt .v wL
le !
v,
WNas,tl
J
Ms. ssic Xill.�s
113 Awm4,le M.
{
Nr. ML15 Nulp.
lH, Fclrfxz
Y.Szlo Mlllnls
11:1 Avomiale M.
X
Ns. CLvde A. 6 pley
4pley Mmtl
}
Ms. "%ie Ntll Lnks
113 Alrn le w1.
tl
Ms. lllmlrtl, Il. 114nn
517 !'ulla'r 9s.
Y
on.
Jo.
lu
M,. IFm, C. vnnn
IIX Avrru4, r NA.
n. 4 1,1,r n. wnn
Gl, nrin 1, wwl
re
Mg. unn5 C. wnn
un A�n,na 1. xn.
1:, IYr,
b,S t'mnF
ylz l:lmR rlv L,.
1J
M5. An4 L A,mrty
12J5 Fa1rv1a+IX.
Ibntt v. -
Yerbr, '0
'fS,IXle�rxq Ur.
10
Xvinck Xvn.
lu r co.
HL94t LY 9] X
1]
Yr. 1Smomm T.
Lvw M..tr.
113 Glenmie M.
J MIaIHG A¢1. 1
l O
O In ^ \
14 ��, •�\ _ O • \\ LEXINGTON OL
0 l�J•: Nello L. Te•
O 1 a
0 IS `r4 �\ Davidson
�<1> FIGURE 1. QUARRY SITE
LISTING AND LOCATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
LISTING AND LOCATIONS OF OBSERVATION WELLS

® OEM
■a■
...Hanson
Henson Aggregates Been
souNeest Region
P.O. Bag Sea
Cheaw. South Cardin 2 M
February 14, 2002 Tel [phone]
Fag E43 537 4871
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center Ffg
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612 1 B 1001
Re: Corporate Name Chance
Dear Ms. Wehner:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. wishes to inform your office that it has
undergone a corporate name change. Effective January 1, 2002 Hanson Aggregates
Carolina, Inc. became known as Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Enclosed please find a completed Page 1 of the NC Mine Permit Application
Form and a completed Land Entry Agreement Form for the following plants which are
affected by this name change and which operate under the indicated existing mine
permit numbers.
Buckleberry Sand -
Permit#51-38
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel -
Permit #43-21
Crabtree Quarry -
Permit #92-03
Durham Quarry -
Permit#32-01
Elliott Sand & Gravel -
Permit #43-03
Elm City Quarry -
Permit #98-13
Holly Springs Quarry. -
Permit_#92-13
L'ezibgtorQuarry- -- -.Permitil
Neverson Quarry -
Permit#98-02
North Durham Quarry
(make" Rougemont Quarry) -
Permit #32-07
North Orange Quarry
("aka" Rougemont Quarry) -
Permit #68-6-
Princeton Quarry -
Permit 951-05
Raleigh Quarry
(°aka" North Raleigh Quarry) -
Permit #92-02
Rocky Mount Quarry -
Permit #33-13
r_.
FEB 18 C� J "1
.I
... ... _.__.
LAND QUH�-!r,( SECTION
Please note on the submitted Mine Permit Application Forms that we have
changed the permanent address for receipt of official mail. I will now be the contact
person at the address as indicated thereon and in the letterhead above.

Also enclosed p find two checks totaling $700.00 to Or the $50.00
p M processing fee for each R name change.
Pursuant to this name change, we ask that the reclamation bond for the mines
previously operating as Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. be returned to us and that
these mines be covered henceforth under the reclamation bond previously issued for
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
We trust that this completes the information necessary to effect these changes to
your records; however, if any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
C5-lk �
Steve Howler, P.E.
Area Environmental Manager
Enclosures
was
CA:
e:+nn
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST. LNG 100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SURE 1240 VOID AFTER SO GAYS 6112 Q
TUCKEgRE, GEORGIA SOW
PAY£g DOLLARS
WlE
TO ME ORDER OF
CHECK NO. iV.
0�
AMOUNT
4
s
(c� HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC:
MELLONW IKNA PH I ADELPMA PA IWIOI
PAYABLE THNOUGH MR I ON BANK(OE) NA, WILMINGTGN, OE
:o:Hanson -- - - -
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST INC.
I OD CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240 y0lo AREA 60 DAYS
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30064
770 491
PAY
62L311
61129
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST INC.'
MBLWAI BANK. N.A, PHILABELPHIA PA (BEIO)
PAYABLE THRGWH MELLON BANK (DE) N.A. WILIAMTCN. DE

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of MineLexington Quarry _ _ _ _ County Davidson
River Basin Yadkin - Pee Dee Latitude (dd.mm.ss) N35-46-54 Longitude (dd.mm.ss) W80-1448
2. Name of Applicant* _ _Hansen Agarengates Southeast -Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** P. O. Box 848-Cheraw, SC 29520_
Attention: Steve Howiler, PE, Area Environmental Mgr.
Telephone 843 - 537 -7883
4. Mine Office Address. NC HIV. 8, Lexington, NC 27405
Telephone
Mine Manager_ _(Greenfield Site)
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit revocation.
***Signature U&t—` - UJI"
Print
Title President
Date Z� (Q�C` 7✓
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the reclamation
bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt of a
complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
E E B 1 8 2002 1

k- I
If
r3 i
i;
If.
I I
I L
f I
-f e
14 0 d I f f
I vil :1
1
f

® 0
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands or
operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as may be
reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the land as
may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry out
reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature: �✓
_L
Print Name: Justin E. Williams
President
.APPLICANT:
Signature:* a- E-' l )j"Uo
Print Name: _ Justin E. Williams
Address: Hanson A re ates Southeast Inc. Title: President
100 rescent Centre Pkwy., Suite 1240
Tucker, GA 30084
Company: Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Telephone: [phone] Mine Name: Lexington Quarry
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
and the approQriate processing Fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order payable to
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to the Land Oaaliity Section
Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form,
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at (919)
733-4574.

_..
. ':-�
.. �. .....
:$d. �:
'I ld 1:(iv �i
�.
�fiL
... °,E:
._ �... .

O
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Applicant's ,Name: NOW 04mco& � Project Name: 1 tU A4
5� 3�$4�33�a�9a398(ldi�o16f3eb S (L(QA �icAd
Sg-0 9a 69PIic./Permit N�.: _County. Date Received: 62 1 1 43 O
Reviewer. River Basin Name: h'G.c� )
❑ New 0 Renewal ❑ Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑Modification(outsidepermit boundaries) 0Transfer ❑Release
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional Information to Needed: $ _
❑ Fee Received: $
Plpoe rnut�e entire application package, to -/I CUtn�.SJL�., Sw1ti--
i( t1 n/l� � 4jaa Regional Office (2 complete copies; attach the "LQ5 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach lzc� the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Form". to the other copy; send both copies to the Regional Engineer)
Date: Routed Rec'd
0 Division of Water Resources Date: Routed X� Rec'd
[INC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed
❑ U5 Fish & Wildlife Service
Date: Routed
Rec'd
Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification reotueste that add land to the permit)
Please route first 3 pages of the application and any location maos-r�
❑ Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed Rec'd _
❑ NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed Rec'd _
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec d _
(Only new applications)
❑ Other:
Date: Routed Rec'd
"'5uspense Date for Comments: 5LI i5 2' (no later than 25 days
from receipt)
Please note the following:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natur
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Sec
sources,
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE) DENa
I. MINE NAME Lev, v, nr.A, "4 rr i 2. MINING PE LMIJIND QtX0T-yiSff 10N
3. OPERATOR it A^So. Aee,11Ae AJ G„d.as 7ne 4. COUNTY /?A ✓•ids tit
5. ADDRESS Ao, too.,/'35F9 QT? Ate- 2_nnoh
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE JI- n,0- 07 T RIVER BASIN YArlu� P< Aoe
8. Person(s) contacted at site rl o U r
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes ED^No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes O'No
11. Date last inspected: —/—/— 12. Any mining since last inspection? ❑ Yes OINo
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? CJ/Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? 2'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes [O'No If yes, describe the
type and seventy of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
17. Other recommendations and comments: 4" Ine'l mate r
S'co � i2Y..t ..�a;.o s4'..\� n�., .\-.. ,� . f., t,/erL. F-a ILi+f.
-buc cam./ n.tL pn+ zmoan\ re ee0 \ l J
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) O Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes F No Proposed date / /
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report f� 21. Copy of Report sent to operator Zi lb /Uo
(date)
INSPECTED BY: __7'Ksz1 � IPei-k4l 1.5 )';r-NCL I. DATE cD/t�\10=
Telephone No: OZ-to) i-i \ - Ett_o� e
wi ite copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
JFM

North Carolina Departmiant of Environment, Heath, and Natural Resour U'S ll - # Il n
Division of Land Resources, Land Ouality Section U /J to p
MINE INSPECTION REPORT J U 1993
(PERNPTTED MINE) sy
1. MINE NAME Lexins'lor i�Lc 2. MINING PERMIT# ar7a
3. OPERATOR _ Bneib'�IP//C Caro/,nnerPaeieJ 4: COUNT
5. ADDRESS/JoR4oKJ3i43 X7-,1J Ale. a7769 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE/X0.2-=0tV
7. Person(s) contacted at sire I✓JR'
B. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes p No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes f9'No
10. Date last inspected:=/_/= 11. Any mining since last inspection? ❑ Yes X No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? O Yes E
If no, explain:
"Zip,s. /e o%.-t/n..,P•/ /✓a3 s, a,�eeF 9a:; n S T- 7 w.os
n/e dnr,/ n., cI ,errs lcni r..�r(; sAP /i. v:n.
V SP/%. J AJep btrn
o sn•m T.4��
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? []Yes ,9 No
If no, explain: Zl S✓on,anoP 1 i?rr,.. •... •„ i 6, �.44'..,/i% ee y.•c%,.,.< <
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in otlste damage? ❑Yes ❑No/ If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage: t o .S/. !!-/ S%Pa:.� iPl� M• nYdl,<wl /,h s
Orr'"tr.P
15. Corrective measures needed andtor taken: A S nn" S.O, %4 .5�<,.11' 6f
in /?Gs:n ST '% Oe✓ Y-AP Gv,;.i .e✓ p`rr, s.oa Gong/�/ .Jkn nn/O
/iP G/.�<'Ju.Ir!/ p/fG IlSlb /: dip D o.�/�+^o-/ [,i, /r a/c'
forme.. w-1 ern., .rrF CnvPi, r `
16. Other recommendations and comments: i/e rp/&o.n / uOOPg..a f. op ;/, f 9.+r.J
lice %. /poto/ won :.v. r nL✓ Ca✓ass< rssuPs. !� T.<,.. l,,.,%//.,. r
-i0ur�u J,4.,. .r�il5 s/...✓h nJu,<aL, nt 5-Ic.L Oa/5 �iSPr ,.rGN /
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report N- map accurate? )QYes []No (Explain) ONot Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? Yes ONO Proposed dafe UI30t 97
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report V . 20. Copy of Report sent to operator —I—I-
-„ / (dale)
INSPECTEDBY; ,ilha<� j DATE
_L LvZS !p
Phone No: (�j/r, ) /V
While copy to fib Yellow copy b opwarw Pink copy to Mining Speaatist
arel

Date: 03/23/1999 2:55 PM
Sender: "Matthew Gantt" <MATT [e-mail]>
To: Judy Wehner
Priority: Normal
Subject Mining Permit #29-13, Davidson County
Judy.
I have no comment on this.
Matt

ends
ONE
jam dddl-lanson
IC�Ij'11 HansenA
O` tRegion East
MAY 0 31999 PSoutheast
Bona Region
Cheraw, South Carolina MID
Tel [phone]
April 28, 1999 By Fax [phone]B41
Ms. Judith A, Wehner
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources �" L ;l„
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P 0 Box 27687 �•2� dMpJ% U�-
Raleigh N.C. 27611-7687. f"
Re: Corporate Name Chances.
Dear Ms. Wenner:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. and Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. is
pleased to respond to your letter dated April 16, 1999 in which you request we
complete the title page and land entry agreement page of the application form to
expedite the name change process. As requested we have completed the title
page and land entry agreement form and enclose them duly signed by an officer
of the corporation. We also enclose our check for fifty ($50.00) dollars for the
requested permit fees.
Should you require any additional information do not hesitate to contact
the writer.
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc.
L�,
Environmental Manager
Encl.
Lettems ncnninelnanrechange2

��` �,n%�-
DATE�TO ASSISTANT (?q DATE TOWSAN
LOGGED IN qMVQ•Q
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROIIU G
company ' f��.""I'li(.b:,Y':r�t:>9"'- Project Name
"+3w•I, 43 •oe. 1�-oI, `+3"i1
"Permit No.'i `!-uA 9,J-c?County4!-J> i.-Od Date Received 5=
✓yCY,:j.;
Reviewer '(:�, ~'�11 .•✓
r
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal 2 Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑
i❑ Additional Information
Fee
Needed
/
i v
Fee Received: Amount
Please route to:
Date
Routed
Field
Office
❑
Wildlife Resources Commission
Date
Routed
* ❑ Archives and History
Date
Routed
❑
Other:
Date
Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: r:-'�
/�'
(Date
received +30 days,
not on weekend) 7-7--
note the following:
uPlease
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

RGn
sun
RANSON AGGREGATES SOUMEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PA AY. SURE 1240 VOID AFTER SO DAYS 58119
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30034
770 491 2777
r.
PAY
DOLLARS
o f
1
TO THE ORDER OF cxecc NO.
AMDVxr

0 0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1.
Name of Mine
dM7kW
County_, J�(�S-tJYI
2.
Name of Applicant*
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail**.
P. 0. Box 13983 Research Trianzle Park. NC 27709
919-380-2500
4. Mine Office
5. Mine
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best
of our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for
permit revocation.
14
.**Signamre Z Date
Print Name C. Whit
President
4-27-99
* This will be the name that the miring permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of
receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the
filing of any supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all
required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as
needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING P494I17 •
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature Signature !
Print Name: C• g [White Print Name: OC • G White
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Address P. 0. Box 13983 Title: President
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Telephone
919-380-2500
Company:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, .T.nc
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application.

• NORTH VRROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
'ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
April 16, 1999
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Nigel Wills
Hanson Aggregates East
P.O. Drawer 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc.
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Mining Permit Nos. 43-01, 43-06, 26-01, 43-21, 92-03, 32-01,
43-03, 98-13, 92-13, 29-13, 98-02, 32-07, 68-06, 51-05, 92-02
and 33-13
Dear Mr. Wills;
We have reviewed the name change request your company
submitted for the above referenced mine site. However, the following
information is needed to continue processing your application:
A processing fee of $50.00 is needed for the Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. name change.
2. Please complete a new Page 1 and Land Entry Agreement
for Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. and a new Page 1 and
Land Entry Agreement for Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Inc. Return the completed forms to this office.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of
the items requested above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please
forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my attention at
the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
xo Clwuiv SECTION 1919p33.4574 FAX [phone]
GWLOCICAL 9I,RV[Y SECTION 1910) 733-2423 FAX [91 91 733-0000
F.O. BCE 27837, RALSI9H, NORTH CAROLINA 27a 117887 TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN 9RUIl OPPon,, xm, A'FIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLCV CR - 50% RI C>CLEO,I O% roar-mxsu IT PAPER

CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Wills
Page Two
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180
days from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information.
If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must
submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not
be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not
granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the
information currently in the Department's files at the end of the 180 day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response,
we encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon
as possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application
sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
4Judth A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JW
cc: Mr. Toby Vinson, E.I.T.
Matthew Gantt, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.

DATE TO ASSISTANT c� `` �% DATE TO SOSAN
V LOGGED IN � 0� •
MINING
�Gn(CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Companyy Project Nam ,
r]4n3.01,43-D �t d�,-U1,43?AI ;•3,8a �1, 43 a3, ,L�GXi{yddaJ, lMUOn..
ip-•L3Permit No. County Date Received
7Z-13, ag-/3, 9�-pa; 3a o7 b—ob, )7.1 N�
Reviewer 44 L� -r3
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and log
in checks.
* ❑ New 1-1Renewal-, Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
n ' C�
Fee Received: Amount OD r O
Please route to:
f��
ids _,t—
JET .nCi, 4 Field office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
SuspenseDate for Comments:- %/(4/lam%.__ (Date received +30 days,
not
on weekend)
weekend)
Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Fiold Office Yelluw and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

0
March 12, 1999
Mr. Tracy Davis
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P O Box27687
Raleigh MC. 27611-7687.
Re: Corporate Name Changes.
Dear Mr. Davis:
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
PO. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina W5W
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
MAf2 .15 1999
Both Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates wish to inform
your office that they have undergone a corporate name change. Effective
immediately Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates will be known
as Hanson. We would ask that you amend your records to reflect the following
name changes:
The corporate name on the following Becker Minerals, Inc. mine permits
should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Becker Inc.
Senter (Permit #43-01), Gardner (Permit # 43-08) and Vander ( Permit # 26-01)
The corporate name on the following Benchmark Carolina Aggregates,
Inc. mine permits should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Cape Fear (Permit # 43-21), Crabtree (Permit # 92-3), Durham (Permit # 32-01),
Elliott (Permit # 43-03), Elm City (Permit # 98-13�, Holly Springs (Permit # 92-
13), Lexington (Permit # 29-13), Neverson (Permit # 98-02), North Durham
(Permit # 32-07), North Durhan (Permit # 68-06), Princeton (Permit # 51-05),
Raleigh (Permit # 92-02), and Rocky Mount (Permit #IT13)i .
-g�
Enclosed you will find replacement reclamation bonds for all our existing
reclamation bonds. We ask that you return the bonds you are currently holding
once you have made the substitution. Also enclosed is the required permit fee for
the name change.

i
In the meantime, should you require any additional information do not
hesitate to contact the writer.
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson A regat s East.
. . II
Environmental Manager
Encl.
Letterslncmi n elnam echan g e

DATE, TO ASSISTANT 9 DATE TWUSAN
LAGGED IN
MINING CBECKLIST
FORw44t ROB G
ov
Company Project Name
..., yeti 3'�f�y. `/3 om,2L •o I, 43'a 1,
�, Permit N0.9A-0A.V-07 County d7-05 %-Oa Date Received -A- 9tii
V3a3, 9S (3, 42 3 c'y-i3, 6y-o& '
r Reviewer �>�
+ Please makecopies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal .z Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
i❑ dditional Information ❑ Fee Needed
4❑� Fee Received: Amount 6.6 OJ
Please route to:
❑'�'44t1'irur.�l. C4LLfi4r Field d Office� Date Routed
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other:
Date Routed
suspense Date for Comments: 1 JJ94 (Date received +30 days,
note on
weekend)
IJ Please note the following:
U A
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

0
uu MAY 031999
April 28, 1999 I By
Ms. Judith A. Wehner
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P 0 Box 27687
Raleigh N.C. 27611-7687.
Re: Corporate Name Changes.
Dear Ms. Wehner:
MEN
NOR
"'Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P0, Box B48
Cheraw. South Carom 9 W
Tel [phone]
Fox 843 537 4871
Vn
N1kPjM:5-ol
(ILT0!
q-t 3
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. and Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. is
pleased to respond to your letter dated April 16, 1999 in which you request we
complete the title page and land entry agreement page of the application form to
expedite the name change process. As requested we have completed the title
page and land entry agreement form and enclose them duly signed by an officer
of the corporation. We also enclose our check for fifty ($50.00) dollars for the
requested permit fees.
Should you require any additional information do not hesitate to contact
the writer.
Encl.
Lstterslncminelnanhechange2
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Hanson AgKWills
ker,Inc.
..
EnvironmentalManager
r' "'�$pA�"iCv Timis VIA",

ti.{
�g
°i ff
I1ANDON'AGGREGATES, INC.
PAFIKWFXSi,
100 SURE 1440
581"19
TUCI ,-GENRGIA30E;PAfdM'AY,
'. TUL1a=R; GEORGIA 300B4.'
VOiD AFTER BO DAYS
55;0 d-
`.
DOLLARS
OAIE '.
- - .i�TO iXE OROER OF -
NO.
AMWNT
c`,'Y�
Y6.
�Mw
Lavo�`-CHE[K
-% :
)�
r OIziJ
r. V'�rAp
v{cn.E H NDGN AGGREGATED SQUI ST INC
'- NELLON GAME N4 PN61OEl HY, PA IN]1N
PAYABLE MROWH MF ON K IOEI N A. YAtM1M.TON. OE
n.
H)
L
�1
h{
}y
HE
S
yK
1
/
I
.
' Y
7,
�.
n
`J
E

APPLICATION FOR A MINING VXUAIT A
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLTCn`NT:"�'
Signature Signature '_
Print Name: C//�'-_IIhite - Print Name: r¢- Gi White
Hans ggregates Carolina, Inc. T
Address P. 0. Box 13983 Title: President
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Telephone [phone]
Company:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Tnc.
Mine Name:
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.

9 o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine
Counry.
2. Name of Applicant*
Hanson Aggregates
Carolina,
Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail**
P. 0. Box 13983 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
919-380-2500
4. Mine Office
5. Mine
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best
or our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for
permit revocation.
***Signature Date 4-27-99
Print Name C. whit
President
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of
receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the
filing of any supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all
required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as
needed.

® NORTH CAINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
April 16, 1999
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Nigel Wills
Hanson Aggregates East
P.O. Drawer 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc.
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Mining Permit Nos. 43-01, 43-06, 26-01, 43-21, 92-03, 32-01,
43-03, 98-13, 92-13, 29-13, 98-02, 32-07, 68-06, 51-05, 92-02
and 33-13
Dear Mr. Wills;
We have reviewed the name change request your company
submitted for the above referenced mine site.. However, the following
information is needed to continue processing your application:
A processing fee of $50.00 is needed for the Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. name change.
2. Please complete a new Page 1 and Land Entry Agreement
for Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. and a new Page 1 and
Land Entry Agreement for Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Inc. Return the completed forms to this office.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of
the items requested above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please
forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my attention at
the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
LAND QUALITY SECTION (919)7aa.4e74 FAX[phone]
O CLOOICAL SURVEY SECTION (9191733.2423 FAX [phone]-ODOC
P.O. BOX 27687, RAL91CH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611-0687 T¢L¢PHONE IS 191733-3033 rAX 19191715.880I
Ary EQV XL OPPORTUNIT' / A"IRMATI V E ACTION EMPLOYER .50% R ECYCLEOII O% POET CONDO HER PAPA R

CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Wills
Page Two
As required by 15A NCAC 58.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180
days from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information.
If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must
submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not
be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not
granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the
information currently in the Department's files at the end of the 180 day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response,
we encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon
as possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application
sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
L
4Judith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JW
cc: Mr. Toby Vinson, E.I.T.
Matthew Gantt, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.

cmi DATE TO I ASSISTANT cs-IRDATE T�USAN
LOGGED IN /&
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTINGU✓�Y
'Q��Q� ✓YYl+.w„ap�, I/`',m,i,e
Company i'vMVh�IA✓dfllA.nelL,lidi Project Name
y.3'01,43-043 4114%A-e,1e191�`I3-b3, U � 'C'lti: /A✓�'/ffit4tLeJea. //pp7//, :k<.r�'.xy, Sf/"eJ,
9'5-0 ari-iPermit No. County Date Received Tt'/d/7f &UA
3 �+8 oa, 3a- o� G.9-ob 3,•os ya oz e / �aG�L
Reviewer %19Ajld. '[�.�
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal ❑i Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed nC�
❑ ' w ,� pKn, (/
Fee Received: Amount hn
Please route to: ,/
4e 9.1w/ i Field Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed+4
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: l� (Date received +30 days,
hot on weekend)
�❑� Please note the following:
�4RJ r ,1) A/AWI,).
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Oflice Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

•
March 12, 1999
Mr. Tracy Davis
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P O Box 27687
Raleigh N.C. 27611-7687.
Re: Corporate Name Chances.
Dear Mr. Davis:
MEN
NEW
08"Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
southeast Region
PO Fox MH
Cheraw, South Camllna 2 520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
E
lx5=11177—
199
Both Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates wish to inform
your office that they have undergone a corporate name change. Effective
immediately Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates will be known
as Hanson. We would ask that you amend your records to reflect the following
name changes:
The corporate name on the following Becker Minerals, Inc. mine permits
should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Becker Inc.
Senter (Permit #43-01), Gardner (Permit # 43-08) and Vander ( Permit # 26-01)
The corporate name on the following Benchmark Carolina Aggregates,
Inc. mine permits should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Cape Fear (Permit # 43-21), Crabtree (Permit # 92-3), Durham (Permit # 32-01),
Elliott (Permit # 43-03), Elm City (Permit # 98-130, Holly Springs (Permit # 92-
13), Lexington (Permit # 29-13), Neverson (Permit # 98-02), North Durham
(Permit # 32-07), North Durhan (Permit # 68-06), Princeton (Permit # 51-05),
Raleigh (Permit # 92-02), and Rocky Mount (Permit #IT] 9).�
33 i3
Enclosed you will find replacement reclamation bonds for all our existing
reclamation bonds. We ask that you return the bonds you are currently holding
once you have made the substitution. Also enclosed is the required permit fee for
the name change.

0
In the meantime, should you require any additional information do not
hesitate to contact the writer.
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson A regat s East.
Environmental Manager
Encl.
Letterslncminelnamechange

0
OAVIDSON MINERAL PROPERTIES, INC.
ISO CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240
TUCKER GE0RGIA 30084 y �VVOID AFTER 80 DAYS
and
#
PAY
61E/311
57738
ifRl i
TO THE ORDER Of
CHECK NO.
;dDISCMXT-_L
AMOUNT
DAVIDSON MINERAL PROPERTIES, INC.
MLLD MINGWO N E10899

CHECK NO. — 2125436 2125436
CHECK DATE -- 03/17/95
STUB 1 OF
INVOICE NUMBER
I DATE
DESCRIPTION
GROSS AMOUNT
I DEDUCTIONS
AMOUNT PAID
2302
03/10
Teer Co. Mining Permits Name Change
700.00
700.00
(one of two checks equaling $750)

302
CHECK NO. — 2125436 2125436
CHECK DATE — 03/17/95
STUB 1 OF 1
-o
Teec CC'Mining-Permits Name .the nge _ 700.00 - 700.406t
-- - PAYABLE THROUGH MELWN DANK IDy NA fi94
WIUAINGTON DE ISM9
'ER AGGREGATES/GENERAL CRUSH MELWN HANK EA" RA. an
`HIL ELPHIAPA I9W2 CHECK
NUMBER 02125436
' SB34103/17/95 8ka,k 700.00
(VOID IF NOT CASHED IN DD DAYS)
FEN HUNDRED AND 00/100
HEORDFROFI,NC DEPT-.OF ENVIRONMENT�. .i ....
HEALTH — DEPT -MINE
PO BOX '27687 I .REsroeN4
RALEIGH._NC 27611.
' (. P..CWNTING N.MAGER,

2125521
2307 3 17Teer Co Mining Fermits'Name Change $50.00
$50 00
(one of two checks. equaling $750)
DETACH STATEMENT BEFORE GEPOBrtING '
PAYABLE THROUGH MELLON RANK (UE� N.A (
TEER AGGREGATES/GENERAL CRUSH WUMINGTON. DE INN E2-E
MI BANK(E RNA, 311 _
PHIUELPHIA P.A. 191M CHECK ' NUMBER 2125521•,
FIFTY DOLLARS AND .00'CENTS
1F ORDER OF. NC DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT _
HEALTH -'DEPT MINE
P.O, BOX 27687 _%
RALEIGH, NC '2.7�617
Ir
03-77-95 $50.00
(vO!D IF NOr cASHEO w:610 Yel
rr
C.C.Q.!�L-!Q.r+ed

DATE TO' ASSISTANT J-DATE TO SUSAN
LOGGED IN
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company Um14 sail? 1JA
C oleo Name
Permit No.y --l6A-p%3Coounty Date Received
Reviewer
-y
Please make copies of check to include with Central office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
New 1:1Renewal 2Modificati n 1:1Transfer 1:1Release
�1:1 Additional Information Eln Fee Needed
LJ Fee Received: Amount �5?J �
Please route to:
LJ Field Office Date Reuted�'; 1-`"73-
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other: Date Routed
Suspense Date for comments: (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
Er/�� 7
Please note the following: v!✓YL�"� i,Y7kG IEQ.l.Pc""% ,'i>Kt?Y
*SUSAN: Please make file andreturnChecklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates
March 17, 1995
Mr. Tracy Davis
NCDEHNR
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
D [E C [E-fv-[E
MAR 2 o 1995
Subject: Corporate name change from Nello L. Teer Co. to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Dear Mr. Davis:
This letter is being written to request that all Mining Permits currently assigned to "Nello L. Teer
Company" be changed to reflect the change of the corporate name to "Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates". The name change is effective immediately. Please find enclosed a check in the
amount of $750 ($50 per 15 permits). Also find enclosed a modified "Land Entry Agreement"
for each site reflecting the new corporate name and a copy of the statement regarding the name
change on the blanket reclamation bond. The following permits should be changed:
Permit Number
Mine Name
92=03
Crabtree Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
51-05
Princeton Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel
68-06
North Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham (Orange) Quarry
98-13
Elm. City Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
29-13
'Lexington Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
P.O. Box 13983, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
Office: [phone] Teletax: [phone]

Page 2
All property owners, company addresses, responsible persons, etc. will remain unchanged. We
will forward a notarized copy of the bonding information as soon as possible. Please send us a
copy of the new cover page for each permit confirming the name change. If you have any
questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Donald Lineberry
Vice President

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT v4ij � � `� r
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of malting necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out rectamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature
Print Name: _
Address
Telephone
APPLICANT
Signature's
Print Name: Donald A. Lineherr
Title: Vice President
Company: Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Mine Name: Lexington Quarry No. 29-1.3
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application.
ge for tee scheduler In tee turns a check or money oraer
C Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent
at the address listed on the front cover of this application
In um'es regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff
at(919) 733-4574.
-19-

Author: Tony Sample at NROLROIP
Date: 9/3/96 4:14 PM
Priority: Normal
TO: Joan Bolick
TO: Tracy Davie
.TO: Susan Edwards
TO: Stephanie Lane
TO: Mall Nevile
TO: Tony Sample
TO: Jim Simone
TO: Judy Wehner
TO: Wanda Hutt
Subject: BENCHMARK - LEXINGTON UARRY
---
STEVE EDGERTON CALLED THIS AFTERNOON AND INFORMED US
NEXT TWO DAYS HIS COMPANY WILL PROCEED WITH CLEARING
OF SSE MEASURES OF APPROXIMATELY 1 ACRE AT THIS SITE
RESULT OF THE TOWN TRYING TO RESCIN➢ THEIR ZONING?
ALLERT US TO ANY POTENTIAL CALLS. TONY
ci P
THAT WITHIN THE
AND INSTALLATION
THIS IS AS A
JUST WANTED TO

; n_1/ 5
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and
Division of Land Resources, Land Qua
Dam:J_JJ�21
Time: Wzo X.
`/❑ pm
•V A� or�
Telephone Log
a
OtIley ,
RECEivE�
rural ResourgHNR
Sectio
s� tt of
SAND QW, Reccivrd �
sEC7_10N
'2. Conversation with: �rr Ych.-� J Telephone: ( r

gb
_s

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Charles H. Gardner, P.C., P.E..
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary November 2, 1992 Director and State Geologist
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
THROUGH: Mell Nevils, Chief (,�V'A
Land Qualityy Section
FROM: Tracy Davis, Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
RE: Mining Permit Application Review
Hello L. Tear Company's
Proposed Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Recommendations: The staff of the Land Quality Section (LOS)
has completed its review of the above referenced application and
recommends that it be approved with certain conditions as provided
for under G.S. 74-51. A draft permit document is attached for your
review and consideration.
Review Procedure: The staff of the Land Quality Section
reviewed the permit application which was submitted on August 19,
1991 and all supplemental information filed subsequent to the
initial application. Furthermore, the N. C. Department of Cultural
Resources -Division of Archives and History, the Division of
Environmental Management, DEHNR, and the staff of the N. C.
Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) were also afforded the
opportunity to comment on the proposal.
In addition to the governmental agency input noted above, a
public hearing was held on the proposal on October 15, 1991 at the
Davidson County Superior Courtroom in Lexington. A summary of the
public comments was made by Ms. Patty Johnson, Hearing Officer. A
copy of the summary was provided to you earlier under separate
cover and a copy is on file with the Land Quality Section.
Collooal Sun Seeeon I -and Quality Saarion Geodole Surat' season
[phone] [phone] [phone]
PO Boa D687 • P IeiRl% N.C. 2761 t-76V • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity A(Rrmadw AeBon Empin,er

Mr. Charles Gardner
November 2, 1992
Page 2
Findings: All of the information obtained to date was
reviewed with respect to G.S. 74-51 (1--7):
(1) "That any requirement of this Article or any rule or
regulation promulgated hereunder will be violated by the
proposed operation;"
There is no evidence to suggest that the proposed
operation will violate the Act as there are over 150
crushed stone quarries presently under permit in the
State that comply with the requirements of the Act.
(2) "That the operation will have unduly adverse effects on
wildlife or fresh water, estuarine, or marine fisheries;"
A detailed erosion and sediment control plan adequately
addresses stormwater runoff from disturbed areas - see
Operating Condition No. 4.
In a memorandum dated September 6, 1991 from the N. C.
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to the Land Quality
Section, NCWRC stated "the applicant appears to have
designed the project with the protection of streams and
wetlands in mind. We have no objections to the project
as proposed." .
(3) "That the operation will violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or groundwater quality
which have been promulgated by the Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development;"
The applicant applied for an air quality permit for the
on -site processing facilities on August 19, 1991 and,
after several revisions, the Air Quality Section will be
completing its review shortly. In addition, a NPDES
permit and Non -discharge permit were applied for on
August 20, 1991. The NPDES permit (No. NC0081094) was
issued on June 5, 1992 and expires September 30, 1993.
The Non -discharge permit (No. WQ0005512) was issued June
15, 1992 and expires May 31, 1997.
Operating Conditions Nos. 1 and 2 of the draft permit
require, respectively, that the operation complies with
state water and air quality regulations.

Mr. Charles Gardner
November 2, 1992
Page 3
The Groundwater Section (GS) was requested to review
appropriate portions of the mining permit application,
including the "Ground Water Survey and Evaluation In the
Vicinity of the Nello L. Teer Company's Lexington Quarry,
Davidson County, North Carolina" prepared by Atlantic
Geotech Associates dated November 1991. The above report
recommended the placement and monitoring of seven (7)
observation wells around the perimeter of the quarry
excavation to monitor any impact the quarry dewatering
may have on water supplies in the vicinity of the
operation.
The G.S. concurred with the recommendations of the report
and such recommendations have been covered by Operating
Condition No. 5 of the draft permit.
The LQS has no documentation of a similar type operation
in a similar rock terrain ever causing a significant
adverse impact on offsite wells.
(4) "That the operation will constitute a substantial
physical hazard to a neighboring dwelling house, a
school, church, hospital, commercial or industrial
building, public road or other public property;"
Appropriate buffers are provided for in the site plans
and referenced to in the draft permit. In addition, a
detailed blasting report compiled by Vibra-tech
Engineers, Inc. dated December 5, 1991 regarding a
proposed monitoring program and projected vibration
values for the site has been reviewed. The report, as
well as a supplemental report dated July 27, 1992,
addressed potential effects of blasting on the existing
sanitary sewer line, City of Lexington's Waste Water
Treatment Plant, and nearby residential areas. The
reports indicate that blasting will not constitute a
substantial physical hazard to nearby structures. The
recommendations provided in the report have been
incorporated into Operating Condition No. 8 of the draft
permit. Similar conditions have been part of each mining
permit issued for the operation of a crushed stone quarry
in the State.
(5) "That the operation will have a significantly adverse
effect on the purposes of a publicly -owned park, forest
or recreation area;"

Mr. Charles Gardner
November 2, 1992
Page 4
This is not applicable as there are no such areas in
close proximity.
(6) "That previous experience with similar operations
indicates a substantial possibility that the operation
will result in substantial deposits of sediment in stream
beds or lakes, landslides, or acid water pollution;"
A detailed sediment and erosion control plan has been
developed for this site and should provide adequate
protection to the surrounding environment.
Specific buffer zones, safety benches, and cut/fill
slopes have been incorporated into the draft permit to
provide adequate protection against landslides at this
site - see Operating Condition Nos. 3, 6 and 9.
(7) "That the operator has not corrected all violations which
he may have committed under any prior permit and which
resulted in:
a. Revocation of his permit,
b. Forfeiture of part or all of his bond or other
security,
C. Conviction of a misdemeanor under G.S. 74-64, or
d. Any other court order issued under G.S. 74-64."
This is not applicable as the operator has no such prior
mining violations in the State.
Conclusions: There is no evidence to indicate that the
proposed operation will violate any part of G.S. 74-51 (1-7) as
outlined and reviewed above. The Act states that "in the absence
of any such findings, a permit shall be granted."
TED/se
Attachments
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
Ms. Patty Johnson
\-,

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150E-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
15oB-43. A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

MEMORANDUM
TO: File /
FROM: Susan Edwards /(�% i
SUBJECT: Notice of Issuance of Minin Permit
A copy of the attached "Notice of Issuance of Mining Permit" was sentto
all people listed in the Affidavit of Notification and any additional people who
sent in letters. If a public hearing was held, a copy of the "Notice of
Issuance of Mining Permit" was sent to all people who signed the sign in sheet
at the public hearing. My initials, written in red, will be beside the names of
the people in the file who were sent this "Notice".
cc: Regional Engineer

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150B-43. A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150E-43_ A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
_C'd'2G Z'( �";,7,
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Caro Iina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case -
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G_S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150B-43. A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9. 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150E-43. A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a.contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carofina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OP
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the Office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150B-43. A ruling on the Department's request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is [phone]. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed
as an adjoining land owner in the application for a mining permit
filed by Nello L. Teer Company to conduct mining activities at
the Lexington Quarry in Davidson County. The mining permit was
issued on November 2, 1992. A recent North Carolina Court of
Appeals decision has held that a person aggrieved by the issuance
of a mining permit has the right to initiate a contested case
hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150B-23 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Please be advised however, that this Department disagrees with
that ruling and has recently filed documents in the office of
Administrative Hearings to limit permit issuance challenges to a
hearing on the record in Superior Court pursuant to N.C.G.S.
150B-43. A ruling on the Departments request is still pending.
Despite our position on this issue, North Carolina law requires
us to inform you of your right to contest the issuance of the
permit. Unless the Court of Appeals' decision is changed, you
still have the right to seek a contested case hearing pursuant to
N.C.G.S. 150-23 of the APA. To preserve your right to a hearing,
you must file a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the mailing of
this notice to you. The address for filing the petition is The
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.
C. 27611-7447. Their telephone number is _(919) 733-2698. This
notice was mailed on November 9, 1992.
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources

_-___T -/ = -- - - -
a�il �1 �bo Owl n,'� �

i
ai'4 i.� ,a'n •�: ,a tip. 'Ar �. �':jt f-
pp
11i
'

;IiAGE 1-_:4FIRMAT101-1
7FAMR-: -
HOI 14:30
M : UAND QUALM ±ECTPOO
2 : 1919733287G
r ITE ST. T I ME I TOTAL I D UPCIS DEPT. I: ODE
1 1-4: 21 C101 09'24 01

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE:
FROM: cciC.,li1i /C�L!/�Y
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611
[phone]
FAX NUMBER: 733-2876
TO. -
PHONE NO.:
FAX NO.: ( ao (4),��
WE ARE TRANSMITTING /:SL PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET.

Mai no gold
® '01m. mom
N E1�1. O L—. TFEE ER COMPANY
A hlemher of THE BEATER GROUP
P. O. BOX 1131 DURHAM, N. C. U.S.A. 27702
October 30, 1992
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Thomas
Raleigh Regional Office
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615-6846
Dear Mr. Thomas:
OFFICE TEL: [phone]
TELEX:6711650
FAX: se8-4898
liov 0 91992
[AND D QUALITY
The purpose of this letter is to request Corps approval for
a temporary road crossing for the project to be known as the
Nello L. Teer Company Lexington Quarry. The property is located
near Lexington, NC, south of Interstate 85 and east of N.C.
Highway 8. The only jurisdictional areas to be temporarily
impacted are an intermittent stream channel. This temporary road
will need to be constructed to allow construction equipment to
build a permanent bridged road crossing from high ground to high
ground. Since the permanent crossing will be bridged with no
culverts, it does not require a permit. There is only a stream
channel with no adjacent wetlands at the proposed temporary road
crossing. Our wetland delineation of this area was reviewed by
you on October 13, 1992 with Larry Sink of Soil and Environmental
Consultants. Larry had previously met with a Mr. Knight of the
N.C. Wildlife Commission on site. Mr. Knight had no objection to
the project.
This drainage is an unnamed tributary to Abbots Creek. We
realize that this is a rather routine approval, but Tracy Davis
of band Quality Section requested we address this issue with you
during his review of our mining permit. (See Corps letter to him
dated 12/29/91). Also, since this impact is less than 1/3 acre
and above headwaters, prior notification to the Corps and/or DEM
is not required for this work unless the district engineer
believes it is of "significant impact".
FOUNDED 1909

Mr. John
US ACOE
Lexington
Page 2
Thomas
Quarry
Please call
information. We
are eligible to
for this work.
SSE/dg
if you have questions or require further
would appreciate written confirmation that we
utilize any one of the various permits available'
Sincerely,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
CC; John Dorney, DEM Water Quality
Tracy Davis, DEM Land Quality
File

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLES H. GARDNER
DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT, MEMORANDUM DIRECTOR
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES STATE GEOLOGIST
//l��A p �f// DATE: 10 9 Z
TO:n- SUBJECT:
riff.
NwM+t
�� J I r
./a.✓tiq,. t

AMM
l' }_q WaGE 1935557131
0UESNON59 CALL Boo TO FFlEE UMCKING NUMBEF
tDl�a . 19.35557131
C'E I RECIPIENT'S COPY
7CFWLOTIE
vom 'fit'/31am1eNlmoNlwv mrrec�Nnx rva 1 erenml I.ewxPmeN rvery mem.,n
Irise (-�Jr.. _E.-DavievznO MENTAL LNC�� YIV0 VA
—rCE_x� $TE_. d__ 12-e.—Salle -8t.- slael-- nvflwmm 6� L1aLy Su1e Z1PAw.5m�E NC 2 8 2 7 0 W^ --
YOUflpRflNiIBILLINfflFFMf110E N4gpNPON (lplpall (Fi511PW Y5Mryypmnwve.f FMIXO WP YC LF, AFI FfOIX AM1I�Mn
Reel
era _
AeM1ev
rwFNr,�a•s�. ❑e.a��.r�❑aa aay.mlml.n•a la �.❑ e.�eee cnr _ __ _--__-sole.—_ z(rxaWee _
.I�onT•Y?IL:)rEpYTldM�i }1ROlS6i�ifiw'Fi'.4:N T/3:N1• ._.
...
ILJH" PFY-W nvem.m
-_
❑a9roon ❑p9. ie wb
..
pg
El
5. ❑q(flyaµg
El
3 Q0.KnFn rvFygv
SY1aiPMev
16 ❑.{!WN(fIRM'S54HYIX(fRFfl'
Vurtn. e-m�
3wi
sa•reLTW
12 Fl
52LrJS FIa[s xv'
. ❑'M.INFRWSKWSi[..nsl
WY SYere Zy
a
13❑FOE
0❑iFOIX [OF
5❑
ioW iolel ioUl
I!❑RWS NN
5f ❑FFOIX N9E
6❑YPYCf�u
i❑OM695V.Lw XE—
Paarelliy:
OW YXMIEYFIW1pHy1MOV
m
,
Emrvryi pLYy
4abn,rl G^nVw
El
/TImeR NM FefEV Em VN=p N111nn
ft
41 EJMa
91:1Q e.wYl%ryW
n gF113 �1
L 1t W F W -_
�IW�JI
fi.Yn
-
w
iOo r
PoO �mY..
,OQ u�p.,.ILY I
IOR4b5.0 ]3 OQm - S�yMJE
sc
❑;M�YNNN e w1
r;
Z` owe(n.1e
~
N.
0 N� m

MULTIPLE PACKAGE SERVICE
IF YOU ARE
MAKING AN MPS
SHIPMENT, APPLY
THE SELF ADHESIVE
MPS COPY HERE
r
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
DEFINITIONS
On this Aubdl. we, art, and us refer to Federal Express Qxporaiori its
employees and agents. You antl yuur refer to the sender its ernpPeydes
and agents
AGREEMENT TO TERMS
By giving us your package to deliver, you agree to all the terms on this
Alrbill aria in 01.1 nerd Service Guide, wi available on request -It
[here is a Conflict between the current SefviCV Guide and this Arrbill, the
Service Guide wril Centel. No ogle is pulhOrized fd alter of modily the terms
oI our Agreement - rL, ' t M
RESPONSIBILITY FOR PACKAGING AND COMPLETINC AIRBILL
You am responsible for adequately packaging yE`ia goods and for
properly IiIhog out this Aubill- Omig5ioppl tine number at packages and
weight per packace.1romtlrr5'Arrbill wrdresult Ilia billing based on our best
esiirnale of the fn3rl ber of fiBCkage6 received from you and an eslimated
••oefaulf' weigght pll package, asaeleniuned are perrudically aulusted Pry
us. - ._. .... ..- .. .-.-.
AIR, TRANSPORTATION TAX INCLUDED
Our basic rate includes a lederaltax reduued by Internal RevenueCoee
Section 4271 on the air transportation portion of This service.
LI!!rrTATiONS ON OUR LIABILITY
AND LIABILITIES NOT ASSUMED
Our liability for loss or damage to your package is limited to your actual
damages or 5100, whichever Is IesS, unless you pay for and declare a
higher authorized value Vve do not provide cargo liability insurance, but
you may pay an additional charge for each additional 5100 or declared
value- If you declare a higher value and pay the additional charge. our
liability will be the lesser bit your declared value or the actual value of your
Package -
in any event we will not be liable for any damages- whether dvect,
incidental, special or consequential in excess of the declared value of a
shipment. whether or not Federal Express had knowledge that such
damages might be incurred including. but not IrnAted ID, loss of Income
Of profits -
We won't be liable for your acts or omissions, including bun not limited to
improper or insufficient packing, securing. marking or addressing. or for
the acts or emissions of the recipient of anyone else with an inlEiresl in Inc
package. Also. we worn he liable if you or the recrpienl vidates any of The
terms of our agreement, We won'[ be liable for loss o1 or damage to
shipments of prohibited items.
We won't lid liable for loss. damage or delay caused by events we
cannot control, including but not Irmiled to acts of God, perils of the air.
weather conditions, acts of public eni war, strikes, civil commi
or ads or omissions of pub4c authorities (including customs and quarantine,
o!4(dats) with actual or apparent authority. _
DECLARED VALUE LIMITS
The highest declared value we allow for FedFk Leiter and FedEx Pak
shipments is $100. For other shipments, the highest declared value we
allow is $25.0D) unless your package contains items ill "extraordinary
value:' mwhich case The highest declared value we allow is $500 Items of
�'extracrdnary value," include artwork jewelry furs, Precious metals negotiable
Instruments. and other Items listed in our Current Sepce Guide.
n Ilryou *no more ih$n ar} kat!:° p?Ihrs AlrbiEl. you rrwy Jill in the lolal
deClaredva(ue IGr allpacE agas,rnol to f5 teed the $700. !.ibo oC,$25,000
perackage phmu described above. {Exenlple. 5 packages can have a total
declared value 01 up Id $125,ON.)
If more than one package is shipped on this aublll, our habrr rylor fossor
damage will he limited to She actual value of Ihe,psckage(s) lost or
da[nageo (not to exceed the lesser of the total declared value or the per
package limits described above) You have [he responsibility of proving the
actual lass or damage
- • - 'FILING A CLAIA/'
ALL CLAIMS MUST BE MADE BY YOU IN WRITING You must notify
its of your Claim wilhin strict [into Il See Current Service Guide.
We'll consider your claim filed A you tali acid notify our Customer
Service DCpartmenl at 800-238.5355 and notify us in writing as soon as
Possible
Within 90 days afturi notify us C1 your Claim you must sent us all
relevanlinformahon-adoutd Wearenolobligatedtoacionany clan until
you have paid all transportation charges. and you may not deducl the
amount of your claim from those charges
If thdrecrpieni accep[syouu packagewtihout notnig anydamageon the
delivery record, we will assume tnat the package was delivered in goad
condaron. In order for us to process your claim, you must, to the exlent
possible, make the original shipping cartons and packing available for
inspection- .
RIGHT TO INSPECT
We tray, al our option, open and inspect your packages prior to or after
you gore Thera la US to deliver NO C.O.D. SERVICES
NO C.0.0 SERVICES ON THIS AIRBILL, If C.O.D, Service is required.
please use a Federal Express C OD aubill for this purpose
RESPONSIBILITY FOR PAYMENT'
Even if you give us different payment Instructions. you wit' always be
primarily responsible for all delivery costs. as well as any costs we may
incur in either retumrng your package Io you or, warehousing it pending
disposition.
RIGHT OF REJECTION
We reserve the fight to ielect a shipment a[ any lime, when such
Shipment would be likely 14 Cause damage or delay to other shipments,
equipment or personnel, or it the transportation of which is prohibited by
law or is m violation of any ru!es contained in this Airbill or our Current
Service Guide _..
MONEY -BACK GUARANTEE
In the event of untimely delivery. Federal Express will at your request
and with some limitations. refund or credit all transportation charges -See
current Service Guide for further information,
Part 41372N1137205
Rev. fi191

AACKAGE
�p SA �T6a.�rue,_, Uw
MLKAGf
1935557131
e„ uz�rN�
NUCKIBG NUMBER .
QUESTIONS? CALL 800-YJS-U55PUIRAL TOLL FREE. _
1935557131
_
3ttE
sm!4CES
UL kmhwe Wy
SENDERS COPY
EPRIAv 2 Sla-B.-Balia6uty-SC. -BealeRb
— .
2 7 0
ive.wam+mo,nwre.l Fnae soRNSt�r nurEOExaartsllNa
vnr�w n
�❑IIOIOF[N F%%.4P rtrnp i.
Si ❑M4YFfip6
2 �OHN[P MH/Ore
_
Yv RMLFq[A'
9 �m' eiame�uru�oa ❑
m PHAD( .
d ❑ Ml14AWSbIHISiur uvpe�
❑ LBLE M
5 ❑
TWI
TUlw Tohl
]❑01KN.SR.'Yf SFK/CE,��
a❑
G i�=M
N❑�I£PP
IXM SNMWM/haWNWOrI
❑
1L . t{� r G�
❑
o a �rv�.H
ROUSSO-
gnm�rmwk
—I
POMGY%e
Su=s
SO SO9Mei
12❑YpM1�Y�OHNL%iv.a®
cmNa E.we55 u:e

TERMS RAW
CONDITIONS
- BEMNITMMS
1' _:,e 110lemanom, e tis Nora aal as uerorau'
Oninsaron I,anus els oFaeoa Fiyress GlpOR on',LlsFmgWaesaMagemsVW
W LSp-0G SLOW 4J FIT J-.c.DecaLvfv.'&ampls.6
aMY uc It anmgWaEMENTTos -
pa , :o'W 2 Sell
nay Does- art .. oaI a ei
�4amrDl
44RfENEN! lO RRMS
pec 9'A1 mayeo� 4erla2t
PIC
By, y oal n m MSPvo Ba a
ve Fa p a9e4 e e Wra1. Va SpansoWygp tg XWaI
1
11 i II Mw�Ne a "ASeMm
Ws oewmaye _.
Gu
GW sn 'awe InmveeW snow rvxiwms
gIINCAcalm
N vL
y
L C—unter NU iBE CANE6 YOU IN liti YI, rtllfl FAX, us0lpw III MINDjap
RESPONSIBILITY FOR PACNALINB AND COMftMNR Al
s De oil 5{MS GIrb., n
we1 e m Serr o pe
"n
I Obr
mo-z a
♦TC_ In aal
w rI o ahaia.J eate.eewnheron nam
-ow I" she n��ee.mI .J
'Ne "r" anmono Nnana .UNINSO
MR TRAMBPoRTATMN TAX INCLU8F8
p
F
oa aabmr mLaanr ewm' . L� .,, ea
n n r
III .� I ;, F,issa e -
mllaL aa:apss�ole g a w�•b eopae. va a aab .,y<i
LIMITATIONS ONWRIMBIUTYANO IJARILITAS NRI ASSUMED _
RIONT To ANSPEC!- _
oa o, aa.g= o-as.,. -
LDmevai oGdpum,00l.emwaa von.paolw o a,na.yon a.a
n
n n. ..
Rw.al.- -
nag p 1, -I
CRe. WES
n W^ IIT1 e. r .« ..I
.N0
fu IF, III
NO 0-LELNI�£G ON THIS PIfl91LL n G0S1 Servare ie L�uLM. uN4m use a Iee
01) Sal
J r¢J
. C
E i.0 9.: m
mRFSP0NS10/UTY
FOR MYMfM._
inner ee .co p s .,a Ile ran
or po..
9 c realms, ya mi airva"5 pmalN laspenable b
N .13
sell a'. Y Ile III Ch intent Is DUE pW Nck3Jeb
pa
^ I. a D-90. _ . o
Ni.re k s 0 1 ' lia
TREAT OF REJECYMN
terve s, oil IT y rp G sms
eDle a J na J et
Wrio'9
I- II a aN
Dailifilial 10 f.
�: L Ma Ol wpnn
npC L ec I one .. er
np nev a n r YD11 zu one Gum
°n In -" IfIppa
MONEY -RACK SUARANTEE
DECLARED VALUE LIMITS
In me III or womel (EuVeDe11INUF IfTC aM.1n
- Thin, S r=aaWyl n: It FevP Letter .dTire, PJ IT pm. ue Sl N For
mNM mCVInil Namynom there ++¢cN Service Islas, at uO r If, of an
OIM . 19"s J0 Jull I III de 'sell This
rleA a [.ane
.von Lv_
_
- pl3]2W /L91A5

TO DATE
REPLY
-pores ro..
SIGNED
SPEED LFi�ER®
FROM DATE
T� -�)}v/S
SENDER: MACH AND RETAIN YELLOW CO", SEND WHRE AND PINK COPIES

E3
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
��hh' ITelephone Log
Daic:LJ�9�- Shcet —LafI
3. Affiliaucn:
4. Coment of
cc:
■
Call: Placed fcl Racivca ❑
Retuned ❑

by �i$u EGA
k)

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-
DIVISION OFMLANDIONAL RE OURCESCE R E C E l 6,
LAND UALITY SECTION y
Q
October 20, 1992
NR-A-0RAN RU1�
TO: Tracy Davis
THRU: Doug Miller
FROM: Gray Hauser //_
SUBJECT: Nello Teer Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
oci 2 loco
LAND QUALITY SECTION
I have reviewed the latest submittal and have the following
comments:
✓l. The construction detail for the temporary stream
crossing shows dirt fill. Bedding the pipe in clean
stone is normally specified and is recommended.
✓2. Additional sediment control at the toe of the bridge
abutment such as silt fence appears needed.
�. visual screening such as Leyland Cypress is
recommended along the northwest side of the haul road.
The haul road and the Kepley property are located on
high ground. During the winter, the trucks on the
haul road will be visible. I recommend planting next
to the road, rather than at the property boundary.
✓4. The information on blasting is very general. Delays
are by definition at least 8 milliseconds apart.
Comments from Doug:
I concur with those of Gray. In addition, I would ask that
Nello Teer define what is temporary and what is permanent. If
the stream crossing stays in more than six months, I consider it
to be permanent.
If this office can provide further input, please contact
[MV
GDM/dh

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consulting Geologists and Hydrologists
P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
June 29, 1992
Mr. Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
Nello L. Teer Company
rP.O. Box 1131
Durham, NC 27702
RECEIVED
OU 0 51992
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Re: Proposed Lexington Quarry,
Davidson County
Dear Mr. Edgerton:
Per your request, this will address the concerns of the State's
Division of Land Resources in the matter of the Lexington Quarry as
expressed to you in their letter dated June 19, 1992.
1. Lack of a seal on the previously tendered report.
Response: Five copies of the report's cover sheet, with
seal affixed, are enclosed.
2. Question of adverse effects of mining activities on septic
tanks in the area.
Response: A statement giving background information and
explanation of the effect is attached.
Sincerely yours,
P.M. BROWN I/NC.
P.M. Brown
Enclosures

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consulting Geologists and Hydrologists
P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
Discussion _of Any Adverse_ Effects on Nearby Septic Tanks
Due to Dewatering of the Mine Excavation
According to information obtained as a result of the
examination of rock cores and outcrops, there are relatively few
interconnected fractures in mineable rock at the quarry site, and,
of those observed, most are narrow and steeply dipping. Thus, the
movement of ground water takes place primarily in the weathered
rock (saprolite) and overburden where those zones occur below the
water table.
Ground water moves through pore spaces and discontinuities in
the saturated zone in response to differences in hydrostatic head.
In undisturbed areas, the differences in head are provided by
differences in land -surface elevation (topography) and the water
moves in response to gravity from high areas toward low areas.
Generally, the position of the water table, the top of the zone of
saturation, mimics local topography.
A mining evacuation creates a void in the saturated zone and
relieves (drops) the hydrostatic head in that area. Water then
moves toward the excavation from surrounding areas in response to
a gradient sufficient to move it through the saprolite and
overburden. Usually the maximum relief of head is controlled by
the depth of the contact between the saprolite and hard rock. The
maximum relief of head is the difference in elevation between the
undisturbed water table and the contact with hard rock, except
where permeable fractures exist in direct contact with the
overlying saturated zone. The distance from the edge of the
excavation out to surrounding areas where the water table is
undisturbed determines the gradient or slope of the water table
surface and thereby delineates the zone of influence around the
excavation. Inside this zone of influence, the direction of
ground -water flow is towards the mining pit. Outside the zone of
influence, pre -mining flow patterns are present. When the
saturated zone is composed of fine-grained "tight" material, the
pore spaces available to transmit water are small, and a relatively
steep gradient is required to move water through such material.
This is the type of material that is present above hard rock in the
Piedmont segment of the state. Its presence results in relatively -
narrow zones of influence surrounding mining pits in the Piedmont.
While there is no "hard and fast" rule involved, the zone of
influence has not been found to extend more than 500 feet from the
edge of a pit in seven other quarry sites located in the Piedmont,
as is the Lexington site. Therefore, given the character of the
soil, saprolite and hard rock at the Lexington site, i+: would be
expected that the width of the zone of influence,wovId.`be irregular
but would not exceed 500 feet.

The purpose of the above discussion is to explain that any
septic tank nitrification field lying outside of a mining pit's
area of influence could not possibly be affected by dewatering a
mining pit.
At the Lexington site, the septic tanks nearest to the
proposed pit are located at more than 750 feet from its proposed
boundary. It is deemed most improbable that the dewatering of the
proposed pit will have any affect at all on septic tanks, their
nitrification fields or on the manner in which their effluent
percolates down to the water table. In order to function properly,
nitrification fields should be emplaced in permeable soils above
the water table. If, in the event that a nitrification field were
emplaced in the zone of influence created by dewatering the
proposed pit, the lowering of the water table could only improve
its efficiency by increasing the percolation time prior to its
reaching the water table. Once reaching the water table, the
effluent could move toward the pit, would be diluted many tens of
times, would be captured by the dewatering system, would be pumped
into holding ponds and would eventually receive a better degree of
treatment than if it were part of many small-town, waste -treatment
systems.

fjD-93-' 92 7IJE 15: 47 I G: AWAFE EHV I i;?OHMEHTAL TEL f•Jp: 17048451759 t*73 POS
Potential impacts of mining aotivities to be addressed in
the hydrogeologiaal assessment should, as a minimum,
include:
(1) Calculate the zone of influence to identify the
potential impact of mine dewatering on neighboring
wells with respect to groundwater quantity
(lowering the water table) and groundwater
quality.
(2) The potential impact of mine dewatering on the
local groundwater quality. Nello L. Tear should
evaluate the potential for poor quality surface
water from High Rock Lake entering the groundwater
caused by groundwater drawdown at the quarry pit.
(3) The potential impact of the unlined earthen
industrial wastewater settling ponds on the local
groundwater quality. NQ110 L. Tear has not
indicated if and what types of flocculant■ or duet
suppression chemicals they intend to use at the
quarry. As required in Nello L. Tear's
application for a non -discharge permit, a chemical
analysis of the wastewater and a site evaluation
to determine changes in litholagy, the vertical
permsability�of the unsaturated zone and the
unsaturated zone and the hydraulic conductivity of
the saturated zone has not been performed. This
information is essential in the development of a
5

NOV-03-'92 TOE 15:87 IU:RWRIRE EIPARONMENTRL TEL N0:1704e451759 4373 P07
predictive model of the effects of the settling
panda on groundwater quality.
A mining permit should not be granted until the effects of
the proposed mining activities on groundwater can be
predicted based on an on -site hydrogeological database
developed to ensure that groundwater standards promulgated
by DEM will not be violated by the proposed operation.
Without acceptable hydrogeological characterization, mining
permit denial criteria NO. (3) cannot be evaluated. The
characterization requirements should be similar in scope to
the requirements contained in the North Carolina regulations
NCAC 10G.0504(C) for landfill siting.
`q BLASTING=STUDY)
If a mining permit is granted for the proposed site, a
preblasting survey as discussed in the blasting study
submitted should bi made part of the permit conditions.
C3. —PHYSICAL RAZARM
The proposed method to prevent physical hazards to Fuller
Road due to blasting and truck traffic has still not been
identified as required by Title 15A: 05B.0004(a)(7). Since
the proposed quarry operation presents a physical hazard to
Fuller street as well as the citizens who utilize it, the
6

NCV-83--' 92 TUE 15: 48 1 L: AWAF'E E[,1l) I FJh111EI)TAL TEL N0: 1'7�J48451759 #873 FADS
mining permit application should be denied based on denial
criteria No. (4),
CI„AmATION- oa-T�_PIT)
Under Title 15A: 05B.0004(b)(1) the applicant is required
to specify land uee subsequent to reolamation, Nello L.
Tear hag not submitted a plan for rovagetation and
reforestation or other surface treatment of the mayor
affected area (the mining area) as required under Titles 15A:
05B.0004(10). In the proposed plan the excavation pit will
be completely abandoned. If the pit is left to fill with
water, what will be its subsequent use; water storage,
recreation or a wildlife area? Each of thence uses require
an overall plan which harmonizes with the reclamation of the
disturbed land surrounding the pit. The plan should also
specify who will manage the area.
�-- tD-BCHEH[1 )
A time schedule for mining and reclamation activities has
not been provided As required under Title 15A: 05b.004(11).
Regulations require that drawings show segments that are to
be mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit. This
is basis for denial of the proposal permit, based on denial
oriteria No. (1) .
1 7

NCU_05-'92 TUE 15:48 ID:M1-4AFE E4-kilFONMENTHL TEL hJ0:17048451759 4873 P09
6,. pKRXANS T-:V,$.. TBNgaRA1tY�$R08TON-COI�{'Z'RQL-STRQC'I'OR=�
The response to many of the items in the mining permit
application by Teer regarding permanent erosion control is
that the temporary structures will be cleaned out and left
in operation. In Item D.B. of the Reclamation Plan, a
statement is made that no permanent drainage channels are to
be built on-sita. This discrepancy remains unaddressed.
,C-7~PPOTNNTIAL-FOR-VI0LATION-DF:EHVIRONb NTAI+-STANMUU%-
Teer has failed to provide sufficient evidence that
violations of air quality, surface water quality and
groundwater quality an promulgated by the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources will not be
violated by the proposed operations (including mining,
crushing, asphalt manufacturing and concrete manufacturing
activities). DLR should require Tear to obtain (a) an Aix
Quality Permit, (b) a NPDE5 Permit, and (c) a Non -Discharge
Wastewater Permit prior to receiving a mining permit as
evidence that violation of air quality, surface water
quality and (in conjunction with hydrogeological as®essment)
groundwater quality will not odour.
i
The City of Lexington requester that the DLR deny the Mello
Tear mining permit application based on denial criteria No.
8

N06 -4J� .92 7JE. 15: :9 iD: PodGEE E4VIRDJPIEHiFL 73 H0:17542451753 flB73 P15
(3) until the N.C. Division of Environmental Management
(DEN) has issued the required environmental permits.
Precedence for satisfying this mining permit denial criteria
has boon set by DLR (i.e. the Nello Tear Elm City Quarry)
where justification that this criteria has been satisfied
was based on the applicant's prior procurement of the
appropriate environment permits from DEM. Plane submitted
by Tsar show the location of the proposed concrete and
asphalt plants. According to the Air Quality Section of
DEN, Tear has not included emissions from the asphalt plant
in its air permit application.
Cs_---IO6=P=[1T=AND-4 01=CSRTI91-tATZ0N7
Tear has not supplied DL0 documentation, as requested,
pertaining to 404 Permit and 401 Certification. Teer'e
response (to Item No. 7) indicates that a site inspection by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not yet been made.
= Famous: KINYNG_P TT—vlOIAT10us)
Previous experiences with other Tear -owned quarry operations
have resulted in violations of the mining permit conditions
including oft -site sedimentation. Tear was issued a Notice
of Violation (NOV) on March 30, 1987 for violations of
E

THE 15: 49 3 D: AWARE ENU 1 ROIT IEN7AL TEL N0: 17048451759 AS73 P11
permit conditions at the Wake county (Crabtree) Quarry and
similarly on February 19, 1991 at their High Point Quarry.
DLR documentation states that Tear has "been quit• flagrant
in these violations". This previous experience with similar
" operations at Teer's high Point and Crabtree Quarries
indicates that there is a substantial possibility that the
operations at the proposed Lexington quarry will also result
in Off -site sedimentation and Teer's permit should therefore
be denied based on denial criteria No. (6).
1�..�itSbQRD�OF=S'�1�TIR0Xid5 AL-VIOLATYONR]
On August 25, 1908, Taor was issued a Notice of
Noncompliance (NON) by DEM for air quality violations
for dust emissions form the crushers at their Lake
County Quarry.
On August 28, 1987, Teer's Durham Quarry received a NON
by DEM for Air quality violations regarding burning
material within 1000 feet from residential areas.
On January 16, 1990, DEM conducted an engineering
evaluation of Teer's Rocky Mount Quarry and found that
the faoility was in violation of North Carolina Air
10

f IOV-03-' 92 TUE 15: 49 ID -AWARE EtIVIRCINMEJTAL TEL 1,10: L1048451759 4873 F12-~-----
t
Quality Regulations. A Notice of Violation (NOV) for
Excessive Viaiblea Emissions was issued on January 23,
1990. Based on the violation, enforcement was issued
against Tear on March 25, 1990 resulting in assessment
of a Civil Penalty in the amount of $3,303.00.
Under Title 15As 05B.0003, a good operating rvoord is
defined as two (2) consecutive years without being assessed
a civil penalty, subject to other enforcement or having a
permit suspended or revoked under G.S. 74-58, or having a
bond forfeited. As discussed above, Tear has been issued a
civil penalty for an air quality violation as recent as
March 25, 1990 (Rocky Mount Quarry) and has issued a NOV
under G.S. 74-58 for violations of mining permit conditions
at their High Point Quarry on February 19, 1991,
Mining permit denial criteria (No. 1) states that it any
requirement of the Article or any rule or regulation
promulgated hereunder will be violated by the proposed
operation, the permit may be denied. Teer's record of
mining permit and air quality violations indicate that Tear
does not currently have a "good operating record" as defined
i
by the North Carolina Administrative Cade, and therefore
I
there is evidence to ®uggest that similar operating
violations will occur at the proposed Lexington site.
11

NUV-U_��J.L 1 i E 1b : bO I D PWARE EHV I ROI MENTAL TEL NC.'17048451759 4877 P1.5
1
Therefore, Toor's mining permit application for the
Lexington &its should be denied based on denial criteria No.
01-1. CBRCUEsITHSJ
Nello L. Teer Company, is a member of the Beazer Group.
Beazer is currently listed as a potentially responsible
party (PRB) to twenty-four (24) CERCLA site% (Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of
1980 Superfund) in the United Sates, twenty-two (22) of
which are listed an the National Priority List.
One particular site (EPA ID No. MDD980705164) in Elkton,
Maryland is a sand gravel and atone quarry where 100,000
drums of solvent wastes and ninety (90) 55-gallon drums were
dumped. The existences of each of these sites indicates
that Beazer is currently in litigation involving mis-
management of hazardous waste and has a poor record of
environmental management.
We believe that the above items present a firm basis for denial
of Nello Tear's mining permit application. Details supporting
many of the comments mention*d herein have been previously
f
submitted.
12

HOV ttZ—'92' TOE 15:50 IU:PHARE EIA'APONNENTAL TEL t1O:17t a s 51'59 9873 P14
I
Please lot us know if you have any questions regarding our
comments.
Sinoeroly,
AWARE Environmental Inc.
9:�� C. ,cam._. ,
Edward C. Pies, Jr., F.E.
Manager, Process and Design Group
HCF/mre
cc: Mr. Duke whinenant, City of Lexington
Mr. John Gray, City of Lexington
Ms, Phyllis Penry, City of Lexington
Mr. Dennis Roberts, City of Lexington
Mr. Roger Spach, City of Lexington
Mr. DQn Riohardson; City of Lexington
12958
13

A 10A
VI NM INC.
i�VIA TELECOPY Ci
November 3, 1992 (HMO �byO✓�
Mr. Tracy E. Davis P f/ 6-d
Mining Specialist G9e !
North Carolina Department of Environment, /TES
Health and Natural Resources F
Division of Land Resources CAjO
Land Quality Section rV
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Nello L. Teer Mining Permit Application
Proposed Lexington Quarry
AEI Job No. P133-05
Dear Mr. Davis:
On behalf of the City of Lexington, North Carolina, we have
reviewed Nello L. Teer's most recent submittal dated September
30, 1992 (received by the Division of Land Resources (DLR)
October 5, 1992). Based upon Nello L. Tear's mining permit
application as presently submitted, the following comments (many
of which have been expressed in previous correspondence and
remain unaddressed) are made for consideration by DLR in review
of the above referenced permit application:
1. POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER IMPACTS OF PIT DEWATERING
The DLR requested that Teer submit a groundwater monitoring
program to address drawdown and contamination of the
groundwater table within the proposed mining permit
boundaries before off -site impacts occur. DLR also
requested that site specific information be provided to
support any conclusions made.
I
995 MONROE FORD • =7J • WAPLOi E.RE 2&O] 1499 • TELEPHONE 7M1 M5-1691 - FAX[phone]

To address the drawdown, and potential impacts of the
proposed mining activities, Nello L. Teer previously
submitted a November, 1991 report entitled "Groundwater
Survey and Evaluation in the Vicinity of the Nello L. Teer
Company's Lexington Quarry" by Atlantic Geotech Associates
(AGA). Teer has now submitted an undated supplemental
section entitled "Discussion of Any Adverse Effects on
Nearby Septic Tanks Due to Dewatering of the Mine
Excavation", prepared by P.M. Brown, P.G. This latter
section provides a brief general overview of groundwater
flow within the Piedmont. However, no site specific
information is presented in this report or supplemental
section to validate the conclusions presented.
The Piedmont Plateau comprises approximately the center two
fifths of the State of North Carolina. (Stuckey, 1953) This
region is composed of many different rock types each
expressing different hydrologic characteristics. Variations
within this region range from: argillites, slates, and
tuffaceous rock within the Carolina Slate Belt to
quartzites, and kyanite-quartz racks within the Kings
Mountain Belt. (Horton, 1991) These extensive variations
within the geology of the Piedmont, indicate data from one
site can not effectively represent the hydrogeologic
character of another site.
2

As a result, to effectively assess the hydrologic impacts
the proposed .quarry will have on the underlying aquifer, a
site specific characterization must be performed. This
characterization should include:
a. A sufficient number of monitoring wells to assess
theihorizontal and vertical components of
groundwater flow within the site prior to
stressing the aquifer by constructing the proposed
quarry;
b. Multiple well hydraulic conductivity testing to
assess the site specific impacts the proposed
drawdown will have on the aquifer both on -site and
to what extent these impacts may effect the
aquifer off -site; and
C. Site specific characterization of the various
hyd'rogeologic units within the underlying aquifer
based on accepted field testing and sampling
protocols.
The impacts that this proposed quarry may have on local
septic systems and potable water wells is important.
Effectively characterizing the aquifer prior to applying the
stresses of the proposed quarry will allow both Nello L.
Teer and DLR to predict and potentially prevent any adverse
impacts these operations may have off -site on groundwater
quality.
The well survey by AGA did not include any site -specific
data regarding measured seasonal fluctuation of the water
table or data to support Nello L. Teer's claim that only
"minor amounts" of groundwater will be removed by pit
dewatering activities. An accurate estimate of the amount
of groundwater that will be pumped from the pit should be
0

determined based on site specific hydrogeological
information. As stated in the groundwater survey and
evaluation submitted by Nello L. Teer, the magnitude of the
normal seasonal fluctuations of the water table should be
established before mining begins.
While the proposed monitoring plan will assist in
determining the impacts as they occur on -site, it will not
predict, or prevent impacts from occurring off -site. Since
groundwater monitoring on -site is a reactive form of site
assessment, a predictive site -specific groundwater model
must be developed to insure that the proposed dewatering
activities and Nello L. Teer's proposed industrial
wastewater impoundments will not impact neighboring wells or
local groundwater quality in general, regardless of the
number of wells in the area or their current usage.
Just as with the mining permit application by Vulcan
Materials Company, Inc. for a quarry in Buncombe County,
North Carolina, the applicant should be required by DLR to
demonstrate with a hydrogeological study before issuance of
a mining permit that off -site impacts on the local
groundwater will not occur as a result of the proposed
mining activities.
4

Potential impacts of mining activities to be addressed in
the hydrogeological assessment should, as a minimum,
include:
(1) Calculate the zone of influence to identify the
potential impact of mine dewatering on neighboring
wells with respect to groundwater quantity
(lowering the water table) and groundwater
quality.
(2) The potential impact of mine dewatering on the
local groundwater quality. Nello L. Teer should
evaluate the potential for poor quality surface
water from High Rock Lake entering the groundwater
caused by groundwater drawdown at the quarry pit.
(3) The potential impact of the unlined earthen
industrial wastewater settling ponds on the local
groundwater quality. Nello L. Teer has not
indicated if and what types of flocculants or dust
suppression chemicals they intend to use at the
quarry. As required in Nello L. Teer's
application for a non -discharge permit, a chemical
analysis of the wastewater and a site evaluation
to determine changes in lithology, the vertical
permeability of the unsaturated zone and the
unsaturated zone and the hydraulic conductivity of
the saturated zone has not been performed. This
information is essential in the development of a
5

predictive model of the effects of the settling
ponds on groundwater quality.
A mining permit should not be granted until the effects of
the proposed mining activities on groundwater can be
predicted based on an on -site hydrogeological database
developed toyensure that groundwater standards promulgated
by DEM will not be violated by the proposed operation.
i
Without acceptable hydrogeological characterization, mining
permit denial''criteria No. (3) cannot be evaluated. The
characterization requirements should be similar in scope to
the requirements contained in the North Carolina regulations
NCAC 10G.0504(C) for landfill siting.
2. BLASTING STUDY
If a mining permit is granted for the proposed site, a
I
preblasting survey as discussed in the blasting study
submitted should be made part of the permit conditions.
3. PHYSICAL HAZARDS
The proposed method to prevent physical hazards to Fuller
Road due to blasting and truck traffic has still not been
identified as required by Title 15A: 05B.0004(a)(7). Since
the proposed quarry operation presents a physical hazard to
Fuller Street,as well as the citizens who utilize it, the
11

mining permit application should be denied based on denial
criteria No. (4).
4. RECLAMATION OF THE PIT
Under Title 15A: 05B.0004(b)(1) the applicant is required
to specify land use subsequent to reclamation. Nello L.
Teer has not submitted a plan for revegetation and
reforestation or other surface treatment of the major
affected area (the mining area) as required under Title 15A:
05B.0004(10). In the proposed plan the excavation pit will
be completely abandoned. If the pit is left to fill with
water, what will be its subsequent use; water storage,
i
recreation or a wildlife area? Each of these uses require
an overall plan which harmonizes with the reclamation of the
disturbed land surrounding the pit. The plan should also
specify who will manage the area.
5. TIME SCHEDULE
A time schedule for mining and reclamation activities has
not been provided as required under Title 15A: 05b.004(11).
Regulations require that drawings show segments that are to
be mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit. This
is basis for denial of the proposal permit, based on denial
criteria No. (1).
7

1
6. PERMANENT VS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES
The response to many of the items in the mining permit
application by Teer regarding permanent erosion control is
that the temporary structures will be cleaned out and left
in operation.: In Item D.8. of the Reclamation Plan, a
statement is made that no permanent drainage channels are to
be built on -site. This discrepancy remains unaddressed.
7. POTENTIAL FOR VIOLATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
Teer has failed to provide sufficient evidence that
violations of air quality, surface water quality and
groundwater quality as promulgated by the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources will not be
violated by the proposed operations (including mining,
crushing, asphalt manufacturing and concrete manufacturing
activities). DLR should require Teer to obtain (a) an Air
Quality Permit, (b) a NPDES Permit, and (c) a Non -Discharge
Wastewater Permit prior to receiving a mining permit as
evidence that violation of air quality, surface water
quality and (in conjunction with hydrogeological assessment)
groundwater quality will not occur.
The City of Lexington requests that the DLR deny the Nello
Teer mining permit application based on denial criteria No.
8

(3) until the!N.C. Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) has issued the required environmental permits.
Precedence for satisfying this mining permit denial criteria
has been set by DLR (i.e. the Nello Teer Elm City Quarry)
where justification that this criteria has been satisfied
was based on the applicant's prior procurement of the
appropriate environment permits from DEM. Plans submitted
by Teer show the location of the proposed concrete and
E
asphalt plants. According to the Air Quality Section of
i
DEM, Teer has not included emissions from the asphalt plant
in its air permit application.
8. 404 PERMIT AND 401 CERTIFICATION
Teer has not supplied DLQ documentation, as requested,
pertaining to 404 Permit and 401 Certification. Teer's
response (to Item No. 7) indicates that a site inspection by
the U.S. ArmykCorps of Engineers has not yet been made.
9. PREVIOUS MINING PERMIT VIOLATIONS
Previous experiences with other Teer-owned quarry operations
1�
have resultedjin violations of the mining permit conditions
k
including off site sedimentation. Teer was issued a Notice
of Violation (NOV) on March 30, 1987 for violations of
9

i
I
i
permit conditions at the Wake County (Crabtree) Quarry and
similarly on February 19, 1991 at their High Point Quarry.
DLR documentai tion states that Teer has "been quite flagrant
in these violations". This previous experience with similar
operations at�Teer's High Point and Crabtree Quarries
-indicates that there is a substantial possibility that the
i
operations at!the proposed Lexington quarry will also result
in off -site sedimentation and Teer's permit should therefore
be denied based on denial criteria No. (6).
10. RECOR
(a)
(b)
(c)
VIOLATIONS
On August 25, 1988, Teer was issued a Notice of
I
Noncompliance (NON) by DEM for air quality violations
for dust emissions form the crushers at their Lake
I
County Quarry.
Durham Ouarry
On Auguit 28, 1987, Teer's Durham Quarry received a NON
by DEM for Air quality violations regarding burning
l
materiali within 1000 feet from residential areas.
Rocky M hint Ouarry
On January 16,..1990, DEM conducted -an engineering
evaluation of Teer's Rocky Mount Quarry and found that
�f
the fac�lity was in violation of North Carolina Air
I

Quality Regulations. A Notice of Violation (NOV) for
Excessive Visible Emissions was issued on January 23,
1990. Bused on the violation, enforcement was issued
against Teer on March 25, 1990 resulting in assessment
of a Civill Penalty in the amount of $3,303.00.
Under Title 15A: 055.0003, a good operating record is
defined as til (2) consecutive years without being assessed
a civil penalty, subject to other enforcement or having a
permit suspel'ed or revoked under G.S. 74-55, or having a
bond forfeit a. As discussed above, Teer has been issued a
civil penalty for an air quality violation as recent as
March 25, 1990 (Rocky Mount Quarry) and has issued a NOV
1i
under G.S. 74-58 for violations of mining permit conditions
at their Big 11 Point Quarry on February 19, 1991.
Mining permit I denial criteria (No. 1) states that if any
requirement of the Article or any rule or regulation
promulgated hereunder will be violated by the proposed
operation, tkiI permit may be denied. Tear's record of
mining permit and air quality violations indicate that Teer
- does not cur liently,have a "good operating record" as defined
by the. North.parolina Administrative Code, and therefore
i
there is evidence to suggest that similar operating
II
violations will occur at the proposed Lexington site.
11

!j
I
Therefore, Te=r's mining permit application for the
I
Lexington sitl should be denied based on denial criteria No.
(1) ,
r'
11.. CERCLA SITES
Nello L. Teei,Company, is a member of the Beazer Group.
I
Beazer is currently listed as a potentially responsible
party (PRB) to twenty-four (24) CERCLA sites (Comprehensive
I
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of
1980 Superfund) in the United Sates, twenty-two (22) of
I;
which are listed on the National Priority List.
�I
One particular site (EPA ID No. MDD980705164) in Elkton,
Maryland is a� sand gravel and stone quarry where 100,000
drums of solvent wastes and ninety (90) 55-gallon drums were
dumped. The existences of each of these sites indicates
that Beazer is currently in litigation involving mis-
management of hazardous waste and has a poor record of
environmental+ management.
F
We believe that tine above items present a firm basis for denial
of Nello Teer's mining permit application. Details supporting
many of the comments mentioned herein have been previously
submitted.
it
�I
", 12

I
11
I�
Please let us know if you have any questions regarding our
comments. I
i�
sincerely,
AWARE Environmental Inc.
Edward C. Fiss, Jr.,� P.E.
Manager, Process and Design Group
ECF/mre i
cc: Mr. Duke Whisenant, City of Lexington
Mr. John Gray,1City of Lexington
Ms. Phyllis Periry, City of Lexington
Mr. Dennis Roberts, City of Lexington
Mr. Roger Spach, City of Lexington
Mr. Don Richardson, City of Lexington
�I
�i
1
I�
I
I
I�
I
12958
I?
f{
�I
13

No')-03-'52 TIJE 15:45 ID:R
TEL (10:17040451750
b273 F131
I
AWARE
FA
INC*
TE. IS (704) 81145-1697
i
DATE?
f
TRANSMITTED BY
TELECOPY PHONE
TOTAL PACES: _
ATTENT"ON
0305 MONROE ROAD, SUITE J,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28270
RECEIVED
NOY p 3IW2
TELECOPY LAND QUALITY SECTION
...._........._.....�.__....,(%�.�.2_': +;.;:::, ::OVER PAGE)
COMPANY:
N.I.C. Z:V--dm
4-.
1 m^cD
Rr Ts . el
CITY: _�nl��kl'KIc-.
11
�
FROM:
A ' r �y
I V Q[3
VV jjyi SS
MESSAGE:
��+ctn r
17 rl gcly
nre_ Y-U r- tic r Cclf)S+r�'r��ie�v coo
Ar ;n�o�1ma�ian.
?/nine
calf /Me
G2r o✓eSin�ns.,.
.
I I
I
I
IF YOU DO
CALL AEI
NOT RECEIIIVE
AT (704)
THIS
81145-1697,
TRANSMISSION IN ITS ENTIRETY, PLEASE
AWARE ENVIRONMENTAL INC. (AEI)
f CHARLOTTF, N.C.
TELECDPY PHONE NO: [phone]
I

I/A
.lam djAtW

_ NOV-03—'92 TUE 15:45 ID:RWRP,E
ENVIROtl9&-ITRL
TEL N0:17040451459
9373 PK
N�
'�1"i� INC I
Yii� iiP]I '
November 3, 1992
Nre Tracy E. oavial
Xining Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality section
p.Q. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Nallo L. Tear Mining Permit Application
Proposed Lexington Quarry
AEI Job No. N133-05
Dear Hr. Davis: I
on behalf of the City of Lexington, North Carolina, we have
reviewed Nello L. Tear's most recent submittal dated September
30, 1992 (received by the Division of Land Resources (DLR)
October 5, 1992). Isased upon Nello L. Tear's mining permit
application as preslantly submitted, the following comments (many
or which have been Ixpressed in previous correspondence and
remain unaddreeeed)lare made for consideration by DLR in review
of the above referenced permit application:
jI I
The DER requested that Teer submit a groundwater monitoring
program to address drawdown and contamination of the
groundwater table within the proposed mining permit
boundaries before of! -site impacts occur. DM also
requested thatllaite specific information be provided to
support any conclusions made.
1
a315 MbNNoe e040 . suai J . w.mon;, Nc =7e 1.w . 'E. EPMOmF (IN) d5 ice? . FAX (?N! e.e.ner

HOIJ-03- ' 92 TUE 15 : 46 I D : AWARE ENIA RC NMD,ITAL TEL NO : 1704845175 D #87v F 0:5 W,
To address the drawdown, and potential impacts of the
n - osed miniing activities, Hello L. Tier previously
ou►:+mitted a November, 1991 report entitled "Groundwater
Survey and Evaluation in the Vicinity of the Hello L. Tear
Company's Lexington quarry" by Atlantic Geotevh *Associates
(AGA). Teer has now submitted an undated supplemental
i
section antit!led "Discussion of Any Adverse Effects on
Nearby Septic; Tanks Due to Dewatering of the Mine
Excavation", (prepared by P.M. Brown, P.Q. This latter
section provildes a brief general overview of groundwater
flow within he Piedmont. However, no site specific
information its presented in this report or supplemental
section to vallidato the conclusions presented.
The Piedmont Vlateau comprises approximately the center two
fifths of the( State of North Carolina. (Stuckey, 1953) This
region is composed of many different rock types each
expressing dilIfferent hydrologic characteristics. Variations
within this region rang* from: argillites, slates, and
1
tuffaceous rock within the Carolina Slate Belt to
quartzites, and kyanite-quartz racks within the Kings
I
Mountain Belt. (Horton, 1991) These extensive variations
within the geology of the Piedmont, indicate data from one
site can not effectively represent the hydrogeologic
character of mother site.

HOV-03` 92 TLE 15: 4E I D: AWARE EMU I RQNE,IENTAL TEL NO: 17048451759 #4873 PO4
As a result, to effectively assess the hydrologic impacts
t,e proposed arry will have on the underlying aquifer, a
sit* speacificI characterization must be performed. This
characterization should include:
a. A sufficient number of monitoring walls to assess
the horizontal and vertical components of
groundwater flow within the site prior to
stressing the aquifer by constructing the proposed
quarryi
b. Mulftiple well hydraulic conductivity testing to
&&gems the site specific impacts the proposed
drawdown will have on the aquifer both on -site and
to what extent thee&* impacts may affect the
aquifer of! -sites and
o. Si.: specific characterization of the various
hydogeologic units within the underlying aquifer
based on accepted field testing and sampling
pr8tocols.
The impacts that this proposed quarry may have on local
septic systems and potable water wells is important.
Effectively characterizing the aquifer prior to applying the
I
stresses of the proposed quarry will allow both Nallo L.
Tear and DLR I
�to predict and potentially prevent any adverse
impacts these operations may have off --site on groundwater
quality.
The well survey by AGA did not include any site -specific
r
data regarding measured seasonal fluctuation of the water
table or data to support Nallo L. Tekear's claim that only
"minor amounts" of groundwater will be removed by pit
dowatering activities. An accurate estimate of the amount
I '
of groundwater that will be pumped from the pit should be
3

NU)-03-'92 T13E 15:46 ID: WARE ENVIRONMENTRL TEL NO: 17048451`59 9873 P05
I
determined balled an site specific hydrogeological
information. !As stated in the groundwater survey and
evaluation submitted by Nello L. Teer, the magnitude of th■
normal seasonal fluctuations of the water table should be
established before mining begins.
i
while the proposed monitoring plan will assist in
determining the impacts as they occur onwaite, it will not
predict, or prevent impacts from occurring off -site. Since
groundwater lonitoring on -site is a reactive form of site
assessment, a predictive site -specific groundwater model
must be davalloped to insure that the proposed dewatering
activities and Nello L. Teer's proposed industrial
wastewater imlpoundmente will not impact neighboring wells or
local ground ` ter quality in general, regardless of the
number of wellle in the area or their current usage.
Just an with ,the mining permit application by Vulcan
materials Company, Ina, for a quarry in Buncombe County,
North Carolina, the applicant should be required by DLR to
demonstrate Iith a hydrogeological study before issuance of
a mining permit that off -mite impacts on the local
groundwater will not occur as a result of the proposed
mining activities,
4

ViBPATECH
The Vibration Monitoring Experts
i
July 27, 1992
Mr. Steve Edgerton
Nello Teer Company
211 W. Parrish Street
Durham, North Carolina
377 Carowinds Boulevard, Suite 112, Ft. Mill, SC 29715
803-548-3066 FAX [phone]
D
OCT 05102
LAND QUAL17y SECTIQfV
Subject: Proposed Blast Design for Initial Blasting
Operations at the Lexington, North Carolina Quarry
Site.
Dear Mr. Edgerton,
Vibra-Tech has reviewed the comments made by the Department
of Environment,,Health, and Natural Resources with regard to
proposed blasting procedures. While it should be understood
by the State of North Carolina that the specific blast
design and subsequent modifications depend to a certain
degree on the judgement and expertise of the blaster of
record for the Lexington site, certain guidelines can be
proposed with regard to the initial development of blasting
operations at the Lexington quarry.
As was mentioned -in vibra-Tech's report dated December 5,
1991, the proposed blasting program for the Lexington quarry
will be based onithe program currently in place at the North
Raleigh quarry. ;Extensive regression analysis was performed
on seismic data collected at the North Raleigh quarry over
the past two years to provide the state with an assessment
of the projectediimpact of blasting on neighboring
properties. ;
In reviewing theicurrent program at North Raleigh, we can
propose the following blast design for initial blasting and
pit development at the Lexington site.
As in all Nello Teer quarries, hole diameter and bench
height has been significantly reduced over the years to
minimize the impact of blasting (ground vibration and air
blast) on adjacent properties. Given these concerns,
initial blasting operations at the Lexington site will be
based on the following design:
Bench height = 25-30 feet
Hole diameter = 4-5 inches
Burden = 9-110 feet
Spacing = 13!-14 feet

Maximum charge weight per delay = 200 pounds
Average charge weight per delay = 150 pounds
Stemming = 7 feet
Minimum delay between charges = 8 milliseconds
Typical shot design will be based on three row shots with
approximately 1015 holes per row. During initial pit
development, overall shot design may vary greatly due to the
need for sinking shots and ramp construction.
Actual blast design for any operation is fundamentally based
on the response of the site specific geology to the
explosive loading of each blast. Modifications to this
basic design may`;be required in order to facilitate optimum
fragmentation and minimizing ground transmitted vibration
energy. These changes will be based on data collected by
seismic monitoring of the resultant vibration waveform from
each blast as well as a review of the muckpile produced from
the associated blast.
As to the actuallprocedures to be utilized at the Lexington
quarry, as with all quarry operations in the state of North
Carolina, the Lexington quarry will be required to follow a
specific set of safety standards set forth under the terms
of the mining permit issued by the State of North Carolina,
various MSHA guidelines, the North Carolina Department of
Labor - Mine and Quarry Division, as well as corporate
policy for Nello Teer aggregate operations.
Blasting will typically be performed by a blasting
specialist associated with one of the major explosive
manufacturers. At all times, blasting operations will be
directly supervised by Nello Teer personnel. No explosives
will be stored on site. On the day of each blast, properly
equipped and marked transportation vehicles will bring all
required blasting agents on site and remove any agents not
detonated during blasting activities for that particular
day.
Safety procedures will include the blocking of all roads
leading through the blast area as well as the sounding of an
audible siren orlhorn prior to each blast. An "all clear"
signal will also'be sounded at the conclusion of the
blasters inspecti}on of the blast area after each blast.
Upon request, the' Lexington quarry will notify by phone any
local resident that wishes to be notified prior to blasting
operations.

i
In reviewing the operations of quarries throughout the state
that are operated by the Nello Teer Company, it is obvious
that the safety programs related to blasting operations have
been designed to insure the safety of both the employees of
the quarry as well as the local population. The utilization
of state of the art blasting techniques as well as
professional blasting consultants will insure that the
adjacent property owners experience no degradation in their
quality of life as a result of blasting operations
associated with,this quarry.
Should you have'any questions or require additional
information regarding the contents of this report, please
not hesitate toicontact me at once.
i
Rku&j
espectfully submitted,
A��
StuartBrashear
Area Manager
Vibra-Tech EnginIeers, Inc.
SCB/vm

"IMo QUALITY SECnory
RECEIVED
OCT 0 51942
LAND QUALITY SECTION
i
GROUIND WATER SURVEY AND EVALUATION,
IN THE VICINITY OF THE NELLO L. TEER COMPANY'S
LEXINGTON QUARRY
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
For
Nello L. Teer Company
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared by
Atlantic Geotech Associates
i
Philiip M. Brown, Consulting Geologist
Raleigh, North Carolina
November 1991
i

Mq<jM&CREED
RECEIVED
September 28, 1992
OCT
� 5
114.43
ENGINEERS
r�&C
'-ATqn QUALITY sEcrroN
SURVEYORS
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
ARCHITECTS Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
PLANNERS N.C. Department of E . H. N . R.
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
RE: Nello L. Teer Company
Proposed Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
I
Dear Mr. Davis
I
We have revised the submitted plans for the
above
referenced project in response
to your June 19,
1992
request for'additional information. Our revisions
and/or
responses are as follows.
Comment #1
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #2
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #3
Approximate distances in question have been delineated
on Sheet SP-5.
Comment #4 1
sulTE+�7 Initial area to be mined has been delineated on Sheet
BUILDING I SP-5 .
5625 DILLARD ROAD Comment # 5
Areas of concern requiring additional visual screening
CARY, NC 27511 have been addressed with the use of Evergreen
Plantings. Areas are noted on Sheet SP-5.
PHONE [phone]
Comment #6
FAX[phone] Construction details for concrete and boulder barriers
have been added to Sheet EC--6.

i
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
September 28, 1992
Page Two
i
Comment #7
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #8
To be handled by Teer.
Enclosed are two (2) sets of revised plans for your review.
We trust or revisions are satisfactory. Feel free to
contact us if there are any further questions.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, P.A.
J'el' �: i 'Y' - ,
Allen R. King, E.I.T.
ARK/jcc
Enclosures '
cc: Mr. Stephen S. Edgerton, P.G.
Mr. Paul C. Embler, Jr., ASLA
" McKm&CREED

I
I
NELL.O L_ TEEFZ COMPANY
A Alember of THE BEAZER GROUP
P.Q. BOX 1131 DURHAM, N.C. U.S.A. 27702
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 6711650 • FAX: [phone]
I
I
Mr. Tracy Davis
NC Dept. of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
September 30, 1992
RECEIVE®
Health MT U 5100992
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Re: Request for additional information for Nello Teer Company's
Proposed Lexington Quarry
I
Dear Tracy:
E
Please find enclosed the response to your questions dated
June 19, 1992, along with a revised set of plans. I hope that
this will fulfill,your requirements for additional information on
this site. I
1. Please find) enclosed four cover sheets with an original
signature and seal from Mr. P.M. Brown of Atlantic Geotech, who
is Nello Teer's consultant for this project.
2. This concern h'as been addressed by Mr. Brown and his response
is included for your review. Simply stated, the report indicates
that there will not be any influence on the groundwater by the
local septic tank field when Nello Teer Company commences its
operations. j
3. The revised plans show the locations of surrounding dwellings
and structures indicated in your letter. The enclosed Vibra-Tech
report on the Initial Blast Design for Nello Teer Company's
Lexington Quarry should answer any questions related to specific
blast procedures to be employed. The burden, spacing, delays and
depths will, to some degree, be controlled by seismic monitoring
results. Nello Teer Company typically fine tunes its blasts over
time so that vibration and noise are minimized to the maximum
extent possible. Initial shots will be based on vibra maps
performed by Vibra Tech so that the blasters will have as much
information as possible prior to commencement of operations.
t
FOUNDED 1909

i
E
Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 2
4. On the revised plans, the initial pit excavation has been
indicated as I understand it at the present time. The mining
operations will commence in the areas closest to the primary
crusher and proceed progressively away from the primary station.
As the site is developed, all areas which will remain undisturbed
after their initial disturbance will be seeded with a permanent
seeding mixture. !Any gullies which develop in these areas will
be smoothed out and reseeded. As temporary sediment basins are
no longer needed,1 they will be removed in accordance with the
reclamation plan and seeded.
I
5. It is Hello Neer Company's intent to intersperse loblolly
pine seedlings in.the areas which may become visible during the
winter months. These planting areas are indicated on the revised
plans for your review. There are areas throughout the 50' buffer
where sporadic evergreen stands exist and it is Teer's intent not
to plant in theseiareas since we feel that natural vegetation is
preferred. Areas which are outside of the designated 50' buffer
but that Teer has no immediate intention of developing will be
left in their natural state. Should it become necessary to
disturb these areas in the future, Teer will plant evergreens in
these areas as needed.
6. A detail of a MSHA approved rock barrier berm has been
included on the pllans for your review.
7. It is not Hello Teer Company's intent to leave the bridge or
the temporary stream crossing in as a permanent structure. As
indicated in the information submitted to your office previously,
we are not affecting any wetlands or any areas below headwaters
of the intermittent streams and these structures are not
permanent. Kevin�Harti.n and John Thomas will be doing a sight
inspection at Lexington; the results of which I will mail to your
office.
i

Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 3
8. The response that I received from the Division of Archives
and History did not indicate any additional information was
required. I have included this response for your review.
Should your any of your staff require further information,
please do not hesitate to call me at 1-800-999-6356.
Sincerely,
' NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
i
i Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
SSEldg
Enclosure i
CC: File
I
i
i
4

I
MFMG CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
i
���✓✓I�� / �ty
Company Project Name &P(,C�LI ✓�40Y l
I
Permit No. �Ia" County 72k✓1X40 Date Received
Reviewer
* F?rNew ❑ Renewal ❑ Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
i
Pf Additional Information Received and Attached for Review
Please route to:
ErCv>�µ3�
�,VI✓:OJd-gAtk,}y Field Office Date Routed
I
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission Date Routed
* ❑ Archives and History Date Routed
❑ Other:
r
Suspense Date for Comments: '' 4 RZ (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
❑ Please note the following: j kAL4 S
Date Routed
*SDSAN: Please return Checklist a - to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office uxeilow Copy to File Pink Copy to Susan

NELLC:> L_ TEEFZ COMPANY
00 ®a ®® A Member of THE BEATER GROUP
P.01. BOX 1131 DURHAM, N.C. U.S.A. 27702
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 6711650 • FAX: [phone]
September 30, 1992
Mr. Tracy Davis
NC Dept. of Environment, Health
and Natural Resolurces
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687 1
Raleigh, NC 27611F7687
RECEIVED
OCT 051992
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Re: Request for additional information for Nello Teer Company's
Proposed Lexington Quarry
I
Dear Tracy:
Please find enclosed the response to your questions dated
June 19, 1992, along with a revised set of plans. I hope that
this will fulfill your requirements for additional information on
this site.
1. Please find -enclosed four cover, sheets with an original
signature and seal Ifrom Mr. P.M. Brown of Atlantic Geotech, who
is Nello Teer's consultant for this project.
2. This concern has been addressed by Mr. Brown and his response
is included for your review. Simply stated, the report indicates
that there will not be any influence on the groundwater by the
local septic tank' field when Nello Teer Company commences its
operations.
3. The revised plans show the locations of surrounding dwellings
and structures indicated in your letter_ The enclosed Vibra-Tech
report on the Initial Blast Design for Nello Teer Company's
Lexington Quarry should answer any questions related to specific
blast procedures to be employed. The burden, spacing, delays and
depths will, to some degree, be controlled by seismic monitoring
results. Nello Teer Company typically fine tunes its blasts over
time so that vibration and noise are minimized to the maximum
extent possible. I initial shots will be based on vibra maps
performed by Vibra Tech so that the blasters will have as much
information as possible prior to commencement of operations.
i
FOUNDED 1909

Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 2
4. On the revised plans, the initial pit excavation has been
indicated as I understand it at the present time. The mining
operations will commence in the areas closest to the primary
crusher and proceed progressively away from the primary station.
As the site is developed, all areas which will remain undisturbed
after their initial disturbance will be seeded with a permanent
seeding mixture. ;Any gullies which develop in these areas will
be smoothed out and reseeded. As temporary sediment basins are
no longer needed,, they will be removed in accordance with the
reclamation plan and seeded.
5. It is Nello leer Company's intent to intersperse loblolly
pine seedlings inithe areas which may become visible during the
winter months. These planting areas are indicated on the revised
plans for your review. There are areas throughout the 50' buffer
where sporadic evergreen stands exist and it is Teer's intent not
to plant in these lareas since we feel that natural vegetation is
preferred. Areas which are outside of the designated 50' buffer
but that Teer has no immediate intention of developing will be
left in their natural state. Should it become necessary to
disturb these areas in the future, Teer will plant evergreens in
these areas as needed.
6. A detail of a MSHA approved rock barrier berm has been
included on the plans for your review.
1
7. It is not Nell 'o Teer Company's intent to leave the bridge or
the temporary stream crossing in as a permanent structure. As
indicated in the information submitted to your office previously,
we are not affectiing any wetlands or any areas below headwaters
of the intermittent streams and these structures are not
permanent. KevinlMartin and John Thomas will be doing a sight
inspection at Lexiington; the results of which I will mail to your
I
office. i
i

{
Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 3
8. The response;that I received from the Division of Archives
and History did 'not indicate any additional information was
required. I have !included this response for your review.
Should you or any of your staff require further information,
please do not hesitate to call me at 1-800-999-6356.
Sincerely,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
SSE/dg
Enclosure
CC: File

McK1N4&CFAD-0
- T
OC t 0 51992
September 28, 1992
ENGINEERS
LAND QUALITY SECTION
M&C 110.43
SURVEYORS
Mr. Tracy E.! Davis, E.Z.T.
ARCHITECTS Mining Specialist
Land Quality,Section
PLANNERS N.C. Department of E.H.N.R.
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
1
RE: Nello L`. Teer Company
Proposed Lexington Quarry
Davidson County
Dear Mr. Davis
1
We have revised the submitted plans for the above
referenced project in response to your June 19, 1992
request for additional information. Our revisions and/or
responses are as follows.
Comment # 1 '
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #2
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #3 '
Approximate distances in question have been delineated
on Sheet SP-5.
I
SUITE 197 Comment # 4
lnitial;area to be maned has been delineated on Sheet
BUILDING I S P - 5 .
5625 DILLARD ROAD
Comment #5
Areas of concern requiring additional visual screening
CARY.NC27511 have been addressed with the use of Evergreen
Plantings. Areas are noted on Sheet SP-5.
PHONE [phone]%
Comment #6
FAX[phone] Construction details for concrete and boulder barriers
have been added to Sheet EC-6.
I

Mr. Tracy El Davis, E.I.T.
September 28, 1992
Page Two
Comment #7
To be Yiandled by Teer.
Comment #8 }
To be handled by Teer.
Enclosed are two (2) sets of revised plans for your review.
we trust our revisions are satisfactory. Feel free to
contact us ilf there are any further questions.
i
Sincerely,
i
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, P.A.
Allen R. King, E.T.
ARK/ j cc
Enclosures {
cc: Mr. Stephen S. Edgerton, P.G.
Mr. Paul C. Embler, Jr., ASLA
N1cKI_tiIc CREED

gel '102
LAND QUALITY SE.C"ON
I
I
I
i
4
l
GROUND WATER SURVEY AND EVALUATION,
I
IN THE VICINITY OF THE NELLO L. TEER COMPANY'S
LEXINGTON QUARRY
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
For
j Nello L. Teer Company
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared by
I
Atlantic Geotech Associates
Philip M. Brown, Consulting Geologist
i
Raleigh, North Carolina
November 1991
I ..
I
. � l' /

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consulting Geologists and Hydrologists
P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
Mr. Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
Nello L. Teer Company
tP.O. Box 1131
Durham, NC 27702
E
i
Dear Mr. Edgerton:
June 29, 1992
RECEIVED
OCT 0 51992
-AND QUALITY SECTION
Re: Proposed Lexington Quarry,
Davidson County
Per your request, this will address the concerns of the State's
Division of Land Resources in the matter of the Lexington Quarry as
expressed to you in!their letter dated June 19, 1992.
1
1. Lack of a seal on the previously tendered report.
Response: ;Five copies of the report's cover sheet, with
seal affixed, are enclosed.
2. Question of adverse effects of mining activities on septic
tanks in the area.
Response: A statement giving background information and
explanation of the effect is attached.
Sincerely yours,
P.M. BROWN INC.
P.M. Brown
Enclosures

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consuiling Geologists and Hydrologists
P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
Discussion of An Adverse Effects on Nearby Septic Tanks
_Due to'Dewaterin of the Mine Excavation
According to' information obtained as a (result of the
examination of rock cores and outcrops, there are relatively few
interconnected fractures in mineable rock at the quarry site, and,
of those observed, most are narrow and steeply.dipping. Thus, the
movement of ground water takes place primarily in the weathered -
rock (saprolite) and overburden where those zones occur below the
water table.
Ground water moves through pore spaces and discontinuities in
the saturated zone in response to differences in hydrostatic head:
In undisturbed areas, the differences in head are provided by
differences in land -surface elevation (topography) and the water
moves in response Ito gravity from high areas toward low areas.
Generally, the position of the water table, the top of the zone of
saturation, mimicsilocal topography.
i
A mining evacuation creates a void in the saturated zone and
relieves (drops) the hydrostatic head in that area. Water then
moves toward the excavation from surrounding areas in response to
a gradient sufficient to move it through the saprolite and
overburden. Usually the maximum relief of head is controlled by
the depth of the contact between the saprolite and hard rock. The.
maximum relief of Bead is the difference in elevation between the
undisturbed water table and the contact with hard rock, except
where permeable .fractures exist in direct contact with the
overlying saturated zone. The distance from the edge of the
excavation out to � surrounding areas where the water table is
undisturbed determines the gradient or slope of the water table
surface and thereby delineates the zone of influence around the
excavation. Inside this zone of influence,- the direction of
ground -water flow iks towards the mining pit. Outside the zone of
influence, pre -mining flow patterns are present. When the
saturated zone is. composed of fine-grained "tight" material, the
pore spaces available to transmit water are small, and a relatively
steep gradient is required to move water through such material.
This is the type of material that is present above hard rock in the
Piedmont segment of,the state. Its presence results in relatively -
narrow zones of influence surrounding mining pits in the Piedmont.
While there is not"hard and fast" rule involved, the zone of
influence has not been found to extend more than 500 feet from the
edge of a pit in seven other quarry sites located in the Piedmont,
as is the Lexington site. Therefore, given the character of the
soil, saprolite and hard rock at the Lexington.site, it would be
expected that the width of the zone of influencewould be .irregular
but would not exceed 500 feet.

The purpose of the above discussion is to explain that any
septic tank nitrification field lying outside of a mining pit's
area -of influence could not possibly be affected by dewatering a
mining pit.
At the Lexington site, the septic tanks nearest to the
proposed pit are located at more than 750 feet from its proposed
boundary. It is deemed most improbable that the dewatering of the
proposed pit will have any affect at all on septic tanks, their
nitrification fields or on the manner in which their effluent
percolates down to the water table. In order to function properly,
nitrification fields should be emplaced in permeable soils above
the water table. If, in the event that a nitrification field were
emplaced in the zone of influence created by dewatering the
proposed pit, the lowering of the water table could only improve
its efficiency by i=ncreasing the percolation time prior to its
reaching the water !table. Once reaching the water table, the
effluent could move toward the pit, would be diluted many tens of
times, would be captured by the dewatering system, would be pumped
into holding ponds anti would eventually receive a better degree of
treatment than if itl were part of many small-town, waste --treatment
systems.

VIBRATECH
The Vibration Monitoring Experts
July 27, 1992
377 Carowinds Boulevard, Suite 112, Ft. Mill, SC 29715
803-548-3066 FAX [phone]
RECE6VED
Mr. Steve Edgerton OCT A 5 ��
Nello Teer Company v
211 W. Parrish Street
Durham, North Carolina LAND QUALITY SECTION
I
Subject: Proposed Blast Design for Initial Blasting
Operations at the Lexington, North Carolina Quarry
Site. i
Dear Mr. Edgerton,
I
Vibra-Tech has reviewed the comments made by the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources with regard to
proposed blasting procedures. While it should be understood
by the State of North Carolina that the specific blast
design and subsequent modifications depend to a certain
degree on the judgement and expertise of the blaster of
record for the Lexington site, certain guidelines can be
proposed with regard to the initial development of blasting
operations at the Lexington quarry.
As was mentioned in Vibra-Tech's report dated December 5,
1991, the proposed blasting program for the Lexington quarry
will be based on'the program currently in place at the North
Raleigh quarry. Extensive regression analysis was performed
on seismic data collected at the North Raleigh quarry over
the past two years to provide the state with an assessment
of the projected+impact of blasting on neighboring
properties.
In reviewing the current program at North Raleigh, we can
propose the following blast design for initial blasting and
pit development at the Lexington site.
As in all Nello Teer quarries, hole diameter and bench
height has been significantly reduced over the years to
minimize the impact of blasting (ground vibration and air
blast) on adjacent properties. Given these concerns,
initial blasting operations at the Lexington site will be
based on the following design:
Bench height = 25-30 feet
Hole diameter 4-5 inches
Burden = 9-10 feet
Spacing = 13--1.4 feet

Maximum charge weight
Average charge weight
Stemming = 1 feet
Minimum delay between
per delay = 200 pounds
per delay = 150 pounds
charges = 8 milliseconds
Typical shot design will be based on three row shots with
approximately 10-15 holes per row. During initial pit
development, overall shot design may vary greatly due to the
need for sinking shots and ramp construction.
Actual blast design for any operation is fundamentally based
on the response of the site specific geology to the
explosive loading of each blast. Modifications to this
basic design may be required in order to facilitate optimum
fragmentation and minimizing ground transmitted vibration
energy. These changes will be based on data collected by
seismic monitoring of the resultant vibration waveform from
each blast as well as a review of the muckpile produced from
the associated blast.
I
As to the actual procedures to be utilized at the Lexington
quarry, as with all quarry operations in the state of North
Carolina, the Lexington quarry will be required to follow a
specific set of safety standards set forth under the terms
of the mining permit issued by the State of North Carolina,
various MSHA guidelines, the North Carolina Department of
Labor - Mine and Quarry Division, as well as corporate
policy for Nello Teer aggregate operations.
Blasting will typically be performed by a blasting
specialist associated with one of the major explosive
manufacturers. At all times, blasting operations will be
directly supervised by Nello Teer personnel. No explosives
will be stored on site. On the day of each blast, properly
equipped and marked transportation vehicles will bring all
required blasting agents on site and remove any agents not
detonated during blasting activities for that particular
day.
Safety procedures will include the blocking of all roads
leading through ;the blast area as well as the sounding of an
audible siren or horn prior to each blast. An "all clear"
signal will also be sounded at the conclusion of the
blasters inspection of the blast area after each blast.
Upon request, the Lexington quarry will notify by phone any
local resident that wishes to be notified prior to blasting
operations.

In reviewing the loperations of quarries throughout the state
that are operated by the Nello Teer Company, it is obvious
that the safety programs related to blasting operations have
been designed to insure the safety of both the employees of
the quarry as well as the local population. The utilization
of state of the art blasting techniques as well as
professional blasting consultants will insure that the
adjacent property owners experience no degradation in their
quality of life as a result of blasting operations
associated with this quarry.
I
Should you have any questions or require additional
information regarding the contents of this report, please do
not hesitate to contact me at once.
Respectfully submitted,
3��V Aazluxl�
Stuart Brashear
Area Manager
Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc.
SCB/vm

i
i
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
A Member of THE BEAZER GROUP
P.6. BOX 1131 DURHAM, N.C. U.S.A. 27702
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 6711650 • FAX: [phone]
September 30, 1992
Mr. Tracy Davis R E` E I V E D
NC Dept. of Environment, Health oci
and Natural Resources L
Land Quality Section
P. o. Box 27687 LAND QUALITY SECTION
Raleigh, NC 27611--7687
Re: Request for additional information for Nello Teer Company's
Proposed Lexington Quarry
Dear Tracy:
Please find ienclosed the response to your questions dated
June 19, 1992, along with a revised set of plans. I hope that
this will fulfill your requirements for additional information on
this site.
F
1. Please find enclosed four cover sheets with an original
signature and seal from Mr. P.M. Brown of Atlantic Geotech, who
is Nello Teer's consultant for this project.
2. This concern has been addressed by Mr. Brown and his response
is included for your review. Simply stated, the report indicates
that there will 'not be any influence on the groundwater by the
local septic tank field when Nello Teer Company commences its
operations.
3. The revised plans show the locations of surrounding dwellings
and structures indicated in your letter. The enclosed Vibra-Tech
report on the Initial Blast Design for Nello Teer Company's
Lexington Quarry should answer any questions related to specific
blast proceduresito be employed. The burden, spacing, delays and
depths will, to some degree, be controlled by seismic monitoring
results. Nello Meer Company typically fine tunes its blasts over
time so that vibration and noise are minimized to the maximum
extent possible. Initial shots will be based on vibra maps
performed by Vibra Tech so that the blasters will have as much
information as possible prior to commencement of operations.
FOUNDED 1909

Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 2
4. On the revised plans, the initial pit excavation has been
indicated as I understand it at the present time. The mining
operations -will commence in the areas closest to the primary
crusher and proceed progressively away from the primary station.
As the site is developed, all areas which will remain undisturbed
after their initial disturbance will be seeded with a permanent
seeding mixture. iAny gullies which develop in these areas will
be smoothed out and reseeded. As temporary sediment basins are
no longer needed,! they will be removed in accordance with the
reclamation plan and seeded.
5. It is Nello :Teer Company's intent to intersperse loblolly
pine seedlings in,the areas which may become visible during the
winter months. These planting areas are indicated on the revised
plans for your review. There are areas throughout the 50' buffer
where sporadic evergreen stands exist and it is Teer's intent not
to plant in these areas since we feel that natural vegetation is
preferred. Areas which are outside of the designated 50' buffer
but that Teer ha's no immediate intention of developing will be
left in their natural state. Should it become necessary to
disturb these areas in the future, Teer will plant evergreens in
these areas as needed.
6. A detail of a MSHA approved rock barrier berm has been
included on the plans for your review.
7. It is not Nello Teer Company's intent to leave the bridge or
the temporary stream crossing in as a permanent structure. As
indicated in the information submitted to your office previously,
we are not affecting any wetlands or any areas below headwaters
of the intermittent streams and these structures are not
permanent. Kevin Martin and John Thomas will be doing a sight
inspection at Lexington; the results of which I will mail to your
office.

Mr. Tracy Davis
Page 3 a
8. The responseithat I received from the Division of Archives
and History did'not indicate any additional information was
required. I have included this response for your review.
Should you or any of your staff require further information,
please do not hesitate to call me at 1-800-999-6356.
i
Sincerely,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
SSE/dg
Enclosure
CC: File

i
,McKIM&C
VEO
OCF o 51992
September 28, 1992 IVn QIJALITy�, 110.43
ENGINEERS I Ip/V
SURVEYORS I
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.Z.T.
ARCHITECTS Mining specialist
Land Quality Section
PLANNERS N.C. Department of E.H.N.R.
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
i
RE: Nello L. Teer Company
Proposed Lexington Quarry
Davids}on County
I
Dear Mr. Davis
We have revised the submitted plans for the above
referenced I project in response to your June 19, 1992
request for additional information. Our revisions and/or
responses are as follows.
Comment 411
To be'handled by Teer.
Comment #2
To beyhandled by Teer.
Comment #3'
Approximate distances in question have been delineated
on Sheet SP-5.
SUITE 117 Comment # 4
Initial area to be mined has been delineated on Sheet
BUILDING t S P- 5 . i
5625 DILLARD ROAD Comment # 5
Areaslof concern requiring additional visual screening
CARY.NC27511 have been addressed with the use of Evergreen
Plantings. Areas are noted on Sheet SP-5.
I
PHONE [phone]D91
Comment #6'
FAXQM233-8D31 Construction details for concrete and boulder barriers
have been added to Sheet EC--6.

f
Mr. Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
September 28, 1992
Page Two }
Comment #7
To be handled by Teer.
Comment #8
To be handled by Teer.
Enclosed are two (2) sets of revised plans for your review.
we trust our revisions are satisfactory. Feel free to
contact us if there are any further questions.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, P.A.
F
Allen R. King, E.I.T.
ARK/jcc
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Stephen S. Edgerton, P.G.
Mr. Paul C. Embler, Jr., ASLA
j M�KIM c CREED

RECEIvFf)
OCT 0 51992
GROUND WATER SURVEY AND EVALUATION,
IN THE VICINITY OF THE NELLO L. TEER COMPANY'S
LEXINGTON QUARRY
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
For
Nello L. Teer Company
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared by
Atlantic Geotech Associates
Philip M. Brown, Consulting Geologist
Raleigh, North Carolina
November 1991

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consulting Geologists and Hydrologists
{ P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
Mr. Steven S. Edgerlton, P.G.
Nello L. Teer Company
iP.O. Box 1131
Durham, NC 27702
a
Dear Mr. Edgerton:
June 29, 1992 RECEIVED
OCT 0 51992
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Re: Proposed Lexington Quarry,
Davidson County
Per your request, this will address the concerns of the State's
Division of Land Resources in the matter of the Lexington Quarry as
expressed to you in; their letter dated June 19, 1992.
1. Lack of a'seal on the previously tendered report.
Response: Five copies of the report's cover sheet,. -with
seal affixed, are enclosed.
2. Question of adverse effects of mining activities on septic
tanks in the area.
Response:', A statement giving background information and
explanation of the effect is attached.
A
I
Sincerely yours,
P.M. BROWN INC.
P.M. Brown
Enclosures

P.M. BROWN, INC.
Consulting Geologists and Hydrologists
P.O. Box 32093 Raleigh, NC 27622
[phone]
Discussion of Any Adverse Effects on Nearby Septic Tanks
Due to'Dewatering of the Mine Excavation
According toj information obtained as a result of the
examination of rock cores and outcrops, there are relatively few
interconnected fractures in mineable rock at the quarry site, and,
of those observed, most are narrow and steeply dipping. Thus, the
movement of ground water takes place primarily in the weathered
rock (saprolite) and overburden where those zones occur below the
water table.
Ground water moves through pore spaces and discontinuities in
the saturated zone in response to differences in hydrostatic head.
In undisturbed areas, the differences in head are provided by
differences in land -surface elevation (topography) and the water
moves in response to gravity from high areas toward low areas.
Generally, the position of the water table, the top of the zone of
saturation, mimics local topography.
A mining evacuation creates a void in the saturated zone and
relieves (drops) the hydrostatic head in that area. Water ,then
moves toward the excavation from surrounding areas in response to
a gradient sufficient to move it through the saprolite and
overburden. Usually the maximum relief of head is controlled by
the depth of the contact between the saprolite and hard rock. The
maximum relief of head is the difference in elevation between the
undisturbed water table and the contact with hard rock, except
where permeable 'fractures exist in direct contact with the
overlying saturated zone. The distance from the edge of the
excavation out to,surrounding areas where the water table is
undisturbed determines the gradient or slope of the water table
surface and thereby delineates the zone of influence around the
excavation. Inside this zone of influence, the direction of
ground -water flow is towards the mining pit. Outside the zone of
influence, pre -mining flow patterns are present. When the
saturated zone is composed of fine-grained "tight" material, the
pore spaces available to transmit water are small, and a relatively
steep gradient is 'required to move water through such material.
This is the type of'material that is present above hard rock in the
Piedmont segment of;the state. Its presence results in relatively -
narrow zones of influence surrounding mining pits in the piedmont.
While there is no�"hard and fast" rule involved, the zone of
influence has not been found to extend more than 500 feet from the
edge of a pit in seven other quarry sites located in the Piedmont,
as is the Lexington site. Therefore, given the character of the
soil, saprolite and hard rock at the Lexington site, it would be
expected that the width of the zone of influence would be-rregular
but would not exceed 500 feet.

The purpose of the above discussion is to explain that any
septic tank nitrification field lying outside of a mining pit's
area -of influence could not possibly be affected by dewatering a
mining pit.
At the Lexington site, the septic tanks nearest to the
proposed pit are located at more than 750 feet from its proposed
boundary. It is deemed most improbable that the dewatering of the
proposed pit will have any affect at all on septic tanks, their
nitrification fields or on the manner in which their effluent
percolates down to the water table. In order to function properly,
nitrification fields should be emplaced in permeable soils above
the water table. If', in the event that a nitrification field were
emplaced in the zone of influence created by dewatering the
proposed pit, the lowering of the water table could only improve
its efficiency by increasing the percolation time prior to its
reaching the water table. Once reaching the water table, the
effluent could move -toward the pit, would be diluted many tens of
times, would be captured by the dewatering system, would be pumped
into holding ponds and would eventually receive a better degree of
treatment than if it were part of many small-town, waste -treatment
systems.

377 Carowimis nnulcvarcl, Suite 112. Ft. Mill, SC 29715
TheVibrahon Monitoring Experts 803-548-3066 FAX[phone]
July 27, 1992 R E C� E 1 V p
W
Mr. Steve Edgerton l051992
Hello Teer Company 1�>7G
211 W. Parrish Street UD QUALITY
Durham, North Carolina SECi10N
Subject: Proposed Bleat Design for Initial Blasting
Operations at the Lexington, North Carolina Quarry
site.
Dear Mr. Edgerton,
Vibra-Tech has reviewed the comments made by the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources with regard to
proposed blasting procedures. while it should be understood
by the State of North Carolina that the specific blast
design and subsequent modifications depend to a certain
degree on the judgement and expertise of the blaster of
record for the Lexington site, certain guidelines can be
proposed with regard to the initial development of blasting
operations at the. Lexington quarry.
y As was mentioned in Vibra-Tech's report dated December 5,
1991, the proposed blasting program for the Lexington quarry
will be based on the program currently in place at the North
Raleigh quarry. Extensive regression analysis was performed
on seismic data collected at the North Raleigh quarry over
the past two years to provide the state with an assessment
of the projected impact of blasting on neighboring
properties.
In reviewing the current program at North Raleigh, we can
propose the following blast design for initial blasting and
pit development at the Lexington site.
As in all Nello Teer quarries, hole diameter and bench
height has been significantly reduced over the years to
minimize the impact of blasting (ground vibration and air
blast) on adjacent properties. Given these concerns,
initial blasting operations at the Lexington site will be
based on the following design:
Bench height = 25-30 feet
Hole diameter = 4-5 inches
Burden = 9-16 feet
Spacing = 13-�14 feet

Maximum charge weight per delay = 200 pounds
Average charge weight per delay = 150 pounds
Stemming = 7, feet
Minimum delay between charges = 8 milliseconds
Typical, shot design will be based on three row shots with
approximately 10-15 holes per row. During initial pit
development, overall shot design may vary greatly due to the
need for sinking I shots and ramp construction.
Actual blast design for any operation is fundamentally based
on the response of the site specific geology to the
explosive loading of each blast. Modifications to this
basic design may be required in order to facilitate optimum
fragmentation and minimizing ground transmitted vibration
energy. These changes will be based on data collected by
seismic monitoring of the resultant vibration waveform from
each blast as well as a review of the muckpile produced from
the associated blast.
As to the actual procedures to be utilized at the Lexington
quarry, as with all quarry operations in the state of North
Carolina, the Lexington quarry will be required to follow a
specific set of safety standards set forth under the terms
of the mining permit issued by the State of North Carolina,
various MSHA guidelines, the North Carolina Department of
Labor - Mine and'Quarry Division, as well as corporate
policy for Nello Teer aggregate operations.
Blasting will typically be performed by a blasting
specialist associated with one of the major explosive
manufacturers. At all times, blasting operations will be
directly supervised by Nello Teer personnel. No explosives
will be stored onisite. On the day of each blast, properly
equipped and marked transportation vehicles will bring all
required blasting agents on site and remove any agents not
detonated during blasting activities for that particular
day. i
Safety procedures will include the blocking of all roads
leading through the blast area as well as the sounding of an
audible siren or horn prior to each blast. An "all clear"
signal will also be sounded at the conclusion of the
blasters inspection of the blast area after each blast.
Upon request, the'Lexington quarry will notify by phone any
local resident that wishes to be notified prior to blasting
operations.

In reviewing the operations of quarries throughout the state
that are operated;by the Nello Teer Company, it is obvious
that the safety programs related to blasting operations have
been designed to insure the safety of both the employees of
the quarry as well as the local population. The utilization
of state of the art blasting techniques as well as
professional blasting consultants will insure that the
adjacent propertylowners experience no degradation in their
quality of life as a result of blasting operations
associated with this quarry.
Should you have any questions or require additional
information regarding the contents of this report, please do
not hesitate to contact me at once.
Re�spect/fully submitted,
'Y/
Aa4lux'4i—
Stuart Brashear
Area Manager
Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc.
SCB/vm