Application Documents

Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit No. 92-10
Modification Application
April 8, 2020

NORTH CAROLINA
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
Revised: 2017

North Carolina Mining Permit Application
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]

Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit No. 92-10
Application for Modification of Mining Permit
April 8, 2020
Background
Through a Mineral Lease agreement with the Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority (RDUAA),
Wake Stone Corporation has the opportunity expand its Triangle Quarry operation. This quarry
expansion will allow the continued production of quality crushed stone products for the local
market from our existing stone processing and delivery infrastructure at the Harrison Avenue
location in Cary, NC. Additionally, through royalty payments to be made to RDUAA under the
terms of the mineral lease, RDUAA will receive an estimated $24M over the projected 30-year
mine life at a time when RDUAA requires funding for needed capital improvements. Since
January 2016 Wake Stone has meticulously investigated the viability of establishing a quarry pit
on the 106+/- acre RDUAA's Odd Fellows tract. Through exploration drilling and other due
diligence activities we have formulated a plan for expanding the existing Triangle Quarry. This
Mining Permit Modification Application package provides the details of our proposed expansion
activities.
Connectivity
RDUAA's Odd Fellows tract is located directly across Crabtree Creek from the current
Triangle Quarry pit. In order to safely and efficiently move equipment and transfer mined stone
between the proposed new pit and the existing processing equipment, a bridge will be
constructed across Crabtree Creek. Wake Stone has engaged the services of Michael Baker
International (Baker), a recognized leader in transportation infrastructure engineering, to assist
in the engineering design and construction permitting for a bridge structure suitable for use in
mine truck haulage of stone to the existing processing facilities. Baker's services include the
examination of any potential FEMA/100-Year Floodway and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule
(NRB) impacts. Baker has, through Sungate Design Group, PA, submitted a No Impact
Certification to Wake County Environmental Services (copy included in Appendices). Wake
County Environmental Services concurrence on the No Impact Certification will be forwarded to
NCDEMLR upon receipt. Minor NRB impacts, which are deemed allowable for bridge
construction, are being addressed under a separate application being filed with NCDWR.
Site development planning has also incorporated engineering designs for improvement
to be made to the pit perimeter roadway around the north side of the existing Triangle Quarry
pit. These improvement include lowering the roadway and the installation of engineered
retaining walls and other sound/visual barrier structures installed for the purpose of minimizing
any potential impacts to the users of Umstead State Park.
Throughout our due diligence period we have acknowledged stakeholders' concerns
about truck haulage on Old Reedy Creek Road and have maintained that no quarry products
(including overburden) will be hauled from the site via Old Reedy Creek Road. Installation of the
planned bridge over Crabtree Creek will facilitate overburden removal through the existing
quarry site and Harrison Avenue entrance, negating the need for customer truck traffic on Old

Reedy Creek Road. If the off -site demand for overburden falls short of the pace of stripping, the
old Triangle Quarry pit will be used for storage of overburden.
Once overburden removal activities are well underway and the initial pit has been
established, we will have a better understanding of the construction industry's interest in
utilization of our overburden for area construction projects. We will also determine the most
efficient methods of handling the overburden based upon its unique characteristics, and the need
to explore other potential material transportation methods. If alternative material transportation
methods are found to be viable within the mining permit boundary, a permit modification
request will be submitted for DEMLR review and approval.
Aquatic Resources — streams and wetlands
An integral part of Wake Stone's due diligence activities has been the identification of and
determination of jurisdictional status of any on -site streams, wetlands, or other aquatic
resources. Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA was retained to perform a detailed
delineation of any such features using standard US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) jurisdictional determination procedures. The
limits of all identified aquatic resources were confirmed through on -site consultations with
representatives of the USACE and NCDWR, and a survey plat prepared by a licensed land
surveyor. Following those site visits, the USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination
(AJD) and NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter. (These documents are included in this
Mining Permit Application package.) Wake Stone has planned and designed its site development
activities in such a manner as to avoid impacts to any jurisdictional aquatic resources.
Mitigation of Perceived Impacts to the Public
Through our due diligence process, we have been subjected to numerous public
complaints via social media and other outlets. We acknowledge that some members of the public
may not think the Odd Fellows tract is a suitable location for a quarry pit, and that establishment
of such will have an adverse effect on their usage of the Old Reedy Creek Road greenway and
Umstead State Park. We take those concerns seriously and have devised our site development
plans in such a manner as to mitigate those concerns. As detailed in the application booklet and
accompanying site plan maps, we intend to retain ample buffers along the Old Reedy Creek Road
and Umstead Park boundaries. These buffers, including the planned construction of expansive
vegetated earthen berms, will provide sufficient set -back distances and visual and sound barriers
from users of Old Reedy Creek Road and Umstead State Park. The perimeter earthen berms will
be installed as early in the site development period as possible. As illustrated on the site
development plans, pit development activities have been planned to initially occur only on the
eastern side of the Odd Fellows tract, keeping mine development activities as far removed from
the public as possible.
Planned Site Development
Incorporated in the application material are detailed plans for development of the new
quarry pit and ancillary features on the Odd Fellows tract, including a detailed sequence of
development activities. Once the Mining Permit Modification is approved by NCDEQ/DEMLR, we
will begin expansion activities according to these detailed plans. Improvements to the existing

pit perimeter road and construction of the bridge will coincide with initial site work on the Odd
Fellows tract, including construction of the perimeter earthen berms. Our intention is to
complete berm construction as early as possible in order to screen the site from public view.
Erosion and sediment control structures have been designed in accordance with NCDEQstandard
specifications. Details for all erosion and sediment control structures are provided in the
application materials and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan designed by Piedmont Land Design,
LLP.
Post -Mining Site Reclamation
As detailed in the mineral lease agreement between Wake Stone and RDUAA and further
discussed in this Mining Permit Modification Application, Wake Stone is committed to reclaim
the 106-acre site post -mining with features such as overlooks, greenway trails, parking areas, pit
security fencing, with connectivity to Umstead State Park. The details of such reclamation
activities will be determined by RDUAA and Wake Stone upon completion of mining activities. As
stated in the April 3, 1981 Final Decision of the Mining Commission (pursuant to issuance of the
initial mining permit for Triangle Quarry), Wake Stone will continue to be obligated to offer to
the State the original Triangle Quarry "quarry site" as defined in the Mining Commission decision
document.
Permit Denial Criteria
The Triangle Quarry has been successfully operated since 1981 without invoking any of
the seven permit denial criteria dictated by the North Carolina Mining Act, and in compliance
with applicable mining, water discharge, and air quality regulations. State and Federal permitting
and required monitoring under the NPDES/Stormwater and Air Quality programs ensure that
continued operation of the quarry will not have adverse effects on wildlife or fisheries, or violate
any air or water quality standard. Existing natural vegetation buffers and proposed vegetated
earthen berms will screen the expanded operation from public view. These buffers and
vegetated berms will provide adequate buffering for neighboring residences, vehicular and foot
traffic along Old Reedy Creek Road, and visitors to Umstead Park. Designated buffers, stabilized
overburden cut slopes, safe blasting practices, and proposed high wall barriers will ensure the
prevention of physical hazard to any neighboring structures or properties.
Wake Stone Corporation has operated the Triangle Quarry since 1981 without violation
of any of the State or Federal regulations governing mining. Through implementation of well -
designed mining plans and sediment and erosion control plans, sediment deposition in
adjoining waterways has been prevented. Undisturbed vegetated buffers along Crabtree Creek
and the Umstead State Park boundary provide adequate buffering to prevent sediment
deposition in the creek, while providing visual and sound buffering of the operation.
Umstead State Park has thrived during the past 39 years, becoming one of the most
popular state parks in North Carolina. Based upon the information provided in the attached
permit modification application, Wake Stone firmly believes Umstead State Park will continue
to prosper as we operate on the RDUAA Odd Fellows property. Our intention is to continue to
operate as we have for the past 39 years, with a dedicated commitment to permit compliance
and environmental stewardship.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of Mine Triangle Quarry County Wake
River Basin Neuse (HUC 030202011
Latitude (decimal degrees to four places) 35.8332 N
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places)-78.7638 W
2. Name of Applicant* Wake Stone Corporation
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
Telephone [phone] Alternate No. (
4. Mine Office Address 222 Star Lane
Cary, North Carolina 27513 Telephone ( 919 ) 677-0050
5. Mine Manager Hunter Bratton, Superintendent
6. EmailAddress:[e-mail]
I certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature / / Date
Print Name Samuel T. Bratton
Title President and CEO
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources must be notified of any changes in the permanent
address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
-2-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered regarding your mining operation for
the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding, detailed mine
map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
1. Answer all of the following that apply:
❑ If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by
the permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
X If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: 92-10 Total permitted acreage: 223 Ac. +/-
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No R. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 2.91 acres newly affected.
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No ❑. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: 106 Ac. +/- (CAD measurement) . (NOTE: you must complete all of
Section F. of this application form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.:
disturbed, ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes X No ❑ (If no, a "minor
modification" fee of $100.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage
to be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 59.3
acres
❑ If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: Total permitted acreage:
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO BE PAID
FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Soil, weathered bedrock, and sound/unweathered bedrock
3. Mining method:
H
Hydraulic Dredge X Front-end Loader & Truck X Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck ❑ Self -loading Scraper
Other (explain):
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) -40 ft. MSL
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
Mean Sea Level
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) +/-300' below existing land surface.
-3-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No ❑
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? No mining activities have occurred on the
RDU Odd Fellows tract. Wake Stone has operated the current Triangle Quarry since 1981 in full
compliance with all applicable State and Federal permit programs.
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (Life of the Mining Operation or Life of Lease from
Public Entity): Life of Mine/Life of Lease (anticipated to be +/-30 years).
B. MAPS
Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six (6) copies of a 7.5-minute
quadrangle and a county highway map. These maps, in addition to six (6) copies of all mine maps and
reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-minute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
1612 Mail Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 5th Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
httD://Dortal.ncdenr.orQ/web/lr/geological home
County highway maps may be obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Mailing Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
1587 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587
I'�
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
http://www.ncdot.or,iz/it/gis/

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. Thus, all mine and reclamation
maps must denote those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining
permit. All maps must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly
illustrate the following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek,
stream, river, or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining
permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has
four lanes of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-49 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)
-5-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, waste piles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
Affected Areas as of
02/04/2011
Land Use Classes Acreage of Affected Area
Currently Active Pit Area
90.25 Acres +/-
Plant/Stockpiles/Office
Areas
57.0 Acres +/-
Vegetated Earthen Berms
17.2 Acres +/-
Total Affected Area
164.45 Acres
Permitted Acreage
223.0 Acres +/-
Proposed Affected Areas for Permit Modification
Land Use Classes
Acreage of Affected Area
Proposed Pit Area (Active
Pit)
93.16 Acres +/-
Proposed Pit Area (New
Pit)
51.3 Acres +/-
Plant/Stockpiles/Office
Areas
57.0 Acres +/-
Vegetated Earthen Berms
25.2 Acres +/-
Total Affected Area
226.66 Acres +/-
Permitted Acreage
329.0 Acres +/-
NOTE:
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FOW. THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE
MAPS.
W-2

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference
the sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
See narrative discussion of sequence of land disturbing activities on the following pages and
reference generalized sequence as presented on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan by
Piedmont Land Design, L.L.P.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of
installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion
control measures on the mine map(s) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details of each
measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any proposed
measures.
See the following pages for a narrative discussion of proposed Erosion and Sediment Control
Structures to be employed prior to initiation of land disturbing activities and reference generalized
sequence as presented on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan by Piedmont Land Design, L.L.P.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes X No ❑. If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
Washed stone products will continue to be produced at the Triangle Quarry, as they have throughout
the history of the quarry operation. These NC DOT specification products are screened to size and
washed at the secondary plant's rinse screen. Plant process water is retained in the water supply
reservoir and settling cells for recycling/re-use. All process water is maintained in a closed -loop
recycle system with a minimum of 1 foot of freeboard at the process reservoir to ensure that no
process water is discharged. Wash water is pumped from the supply reservoir to the wash plant for
use in washing of stone as it crosses the rinse screen. This process water is then routed through a
double screw classifier ("sand screw") for capture of coarse mineral fines in the production of
"Classified Screenings". Overflow from the sand screw is pumped to an array of hydro -cyclones
for removal of mineral fines. These mineral fines are dewatered across a high frequency de -watering
screen, and are then incorporated into the "Processed Fill" product stockpile. Following recovery of
fine and coarse mineral particles, the remaining effluent is routed through two settling cells for
removal of ultra -fine mineral particles prior to being returned to the process water reservoir for
recycling as the final step in this closed -loop water recycle system.
Hychem HYPERFLOC CP 757, an organic cationic coagulant liquid, is metered in small volumes into the
process water stream at the sand screw overflow in order to increase settling efficiency in the settling
cells.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yes X No ❑. If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge and
locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine map(s).
Pit dewatering effluent is periodically discharged to an unnamed tributary to Crabtree Creek under
the provisions of Stormwater General Permit Number NCG020001. Plant process water is retained on -
site in the previously described closed -loop water recycle system.
-7-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Sequence of Land Disturbing Activities
Detailed Construction Sequence for Triangle Quarry RDU Expansion
1. Secure Mining Permit modification approval, FEMA "no rise" certification for bridge construction, and NC
DWR notifications of allowable buffer impacts for bridge construction.
2. Improve existing construction entrance on RDU property as shown on E&SC Plan for logging and initial site
preparation.
3. Remove Trees for 59.3 acre RDU expansion and for 2.9 acre Triangle Perimeter road improvements as
illustrated as "Clearing Limits" on PLD E&SC Plan. Logging activities will utilize Old Reedy Creek Rd for log
Transport.
4. Stake out and Install silt fence and/or super silt fence as shown on PLD E&SC Plan (Sheets 2, 3, 8, and 9).
5. Construct Temporary Sediment Basin 7 and associated diversions as illustrated on PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet
8). Stabilize disturbed areas with vegetation as specified in PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 11).
6. Once appropriate E&SC measures are installed around Triangle Quarry perimeter road improvement
areas, construction will begin at the easternmost point and progress to the west. The proposed method
of construction for the cut areas of the road will ensure all drainage is diverted into the existing pit via
super elevation of the road surface as illustrated by cross sections on WSC Site Plan (Sheets 7 and 9).
Engineered retaining walls along fill areas will be constructed and fill placed and compacted to ensure all
drainage is diverted into the existing pit or to Temporary Basin 7 as shown on PLD E&SC Plan (Sheets 8
and 9 ). Safety berms, large boulder barricades, or concrete block barricades will be utilized to meet MSHA
safety requirements along any rollover hazard areas. This phase of perimeter road improvement will also
include filling and grading of pre-existing SDO-4 basin and Temporary Basin 7 to divert all stormwater
runoff to the existing pit. Noise and visual abatement will be provided along Umstead State Park facing
areas by the inclusion of a 14' high solid barrier where needed as shown by cross sections on WSC Site
Plan (Sheet 9).
7. Construct Temporary Sediment Basins 1, 2, and 3, including installation of culverts under proposed berm
in the locations shown on PLD E&SC Plan, and all associated diversion ditches/swales and slope drains
(Sheets 4 and 5). Stabilize disturbed areas with vegetation as specified (Sheet 11).
8. Once required E&SC measures are in place, construction of the proposed RDU perimeter visual barrier
berm and perimeter access road will begin. Berm construction will begin at the western end to provide
visual and noise buffer along the Old Reedy Creek Road corridor. In order to minimize impacts and
disturbed area, the footprint of the berm will be utilized for haulage of overburden material used for
construction of the berm. The construction entrance will be relocated to the southwest as berm
construction continues around the Dunn residence and along the Umstead Park boundary, as illustrated
on PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 6).
9. Grade construction areas on either side of the proposed bridge crossing in preparation for bridge
construction. All graded areas shall be diverted to Temporary Basin 3, Temporary Basin 7, or to the
existing Triangle Pit for sediment control prior to discharge under existing NCG02 permit as either
stormwater or pit-dewatering wastewater as required. Material excavated from the 280' elevation on the
RDU site in preparation for the bridge construction will be placed as fill material for the vegetated
perimeter berm.
10. Install onsite concrete washout structures as specified in PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 10).
11. Bridge construction will begin with the pouring of concrete abutments, girder placement, decking, and
guardrail concrete pours. This construction will be performed in accordance with bridge design drawings

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
permitted through Wake County. Bridge construction traffic may use Old Reedy Creek Rd if needed for
access.
12. Construct Temporary Sediment Basin 4 and associated "Phase 1" diversions and slope drain. Stabilize
disturbed areas with vegetation as specified In PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 5).
13. Construct Temporary Sediment Basins 5 and 6 as shown on E&SC Plan (Sheet 5). Stabilize disturbed areas
with vegetation as specified in PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 11).
14. Once all "Phase 1" E&SC measures are installed, stumping and grubbing of initial pit area can commence.
However, upon completion of the proposed vegetated berm, no further excavations will proceed until
bridge construction is complete, and overburden material can be hauled across the bridge and either end -
dumped into the depleted existing quarry pit as indicated on WSC Site Plan (Sheet 7 and 8), or taken
offsite as borrow material via the existing quarry entrance at Star Lane. No overburden or rock traffic will
exit the site via Old Reedy Creek Rd.
15. Once the bridge construction is complete AND the existing quarry perimeter road improvements are
complete, production drilling and blasting activities will begin on the RDU expansion area. Weathered
rock material will be hauled to the existing in -pit primary crusher and run through the existing process
plant as "processed fill" as needed by market demand, or else end -dumped to the depleted existing
quarry pit. Blasted stone will be hauled across the bridge to the existing in -pit primary and processed as
NCDOT specified products stockpiled and sold from the same yard, scale, and entrance locations as the
existing operation.
16. The current pit sump will remain in place at an elevation currently estimated to be at least 130' above the
final pit floor elevation, maintaining separation of water used for make-up water for the process water
reservoir and/or discharged as pit dewatering wastewater. Smaller portable pumps may be utilized to
transfer water from lower pit levels (as they are currently) to the sump as needed.
17. As stripping continues around the southern perimeter of the RDU property, the "Phase 2" diversion will
be constructed in conjunction with a future pit perimeter road to carry all stormwater runoff to
Temporary Basin 4. Temporary Basins 5 and 6 will be removed as this new diversion will render them
obsolete as illustrated in PLD E&SC Plan (Sheet 7).
18. Early stages of pit development may include sinking a ramp down along the inside of the new RDU pit
perimeter road. As this excavation advances to the south, all accumulated stormwater and groundwater
will be pumped to the existing Triangle Quarry pit, and managed under current NCG02 guidelines.
19. As the new pit development progresses to the south, eventually Temporary Sediment Basin 4 will also be
removed and incorporated into overburden cut slope for the new mine pit as shown on WSC Site Plan
(Sheet 5). At that point, all disturbed areas will drain to the new pit, and all accumulated stormwater and
groundwater will be stored as needed or pumped to the preexisting pit for treatment and use, or
discharged at the existing approved discharge location under NCG02. The earthen embankment and
perimeter road will remain to provide flood protection from Crabtree Creek and to provide perimeter
access for the newly established mine pit.
I�

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Erosion and Sediment Control
Erosion and sediment control structures to be utilized during site development activities consist of
graded earthen diversions, temporary (skimmer type) sediment basins, standard silt fencing, and "super" silt
fencing. All such structures are illustrated on the accompanying site development plans, with construction
details and engineering design calculations provided in the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan documents
prepared by Piedmont Land Design, L.L.P. (PLD).
Stabilized Construction Entrance
During initial site development activities (including timber removal) access will be via the existing site
entrance driveway located adjacent to the Dunn property on Old Reedy Creek Road. This driveway has been
improved to "temporary construction entrance" design specifications during Wake Stone's due diligence
period. The drive is stabilized with Class A/Surge rip rap and secured by a locking cable gate. As planned
perimeter berm construction advances to the point of rendering this entrance obsolete, a new construction
entrance will be installed at the southwest terminus of the Old Reed Creek Road berm. Construction details
for this secondary entrance are provided in the PLD documents and will consist of geotextile underlayment
beneath Class A/Surge rip rap. An NCDOT driveway permit will be applied for and obtained prior to initiation
of construction of this new construction entrance.
Silt Fencing / Super Silt Fencing
Silt Fencing and Super Silt Fencing will be utilized along disturbance limits as illustrated on the site
development plans. Construction details for silt fencing and super silt fencing are provided in the PLD Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan drawings and details.
Graded earthen diversions
Numerous graded earthen diversions are to be utilized to direct runoff from disturbed areas to
planned skimmer sediment basins. Construction and stabilization details for the proposed temporary
diversions are provided in the PLD Erosion and Sediment Control Plan documents.
Skimmer type temporary sediment basins
Skimmer type temporary sediment basins will be utilized for sediment containment and stormwater
collection during early site development activities. Proposed Sediment Basins 1 through 7 are illustrated on
the site development plan drawings with construction details and supporting engineering calculations
provided in the PLD Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. All proposed basins will be provided with fabric
baffles and surface dewatering (skimmer) devices. Principal spillway pipes and emergency spillways will be
stabilized with geotextile or rip rap pads as indicated in the PLD plan set.
Installation sequence and maintenance of structures
The sequence for installation of proposed Erosion and Sediment Control structures is provided in the
previous discussion of "chronological sequence of land disturbing activities". Structures will be inspected
daily and following each rainfall event with potential to generate runoff. Temporary diversions and silt
fencing will be repaired as necessary should inspections dictate the need for maintenance or repair. Sediment
accumulated behind silt fencing will be removed and fencing repairs undertaken as needed.
Temporary sediment basins will be inspected following each rainfall event. Accumulated sediment
will be removed once it reaches 50% of the sediment containment capacity. Repair or replacement of basin
baffles will be undertaken on as needed basis as determined by periodic inspections.
-10-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal
rate in gallons per day: 5-Yr. ave. = 0.199 MGD. Locate all existing wells on the mine map(s) that
lie within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any conclusions or
statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and current water
withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water system or
private wells.
Stormwater runoff and minor groundwater infiltration into the existing Triangle Quarry pit is
collected within the pit sump for retention, transfer to the process water closed -loop system
as make-up water, or discharged to an unnamed tributary to Crabtree Creek under the
provisions of NCG0200001. Daily withdrawal and discharge records are maintained in the
quarry office and are tabulated and reported to the NC Division of Water Resources annually
pursuant to the requirements of NCGS 143-215.22H. These reported data indicate a 5-year
(2014-2018) average daily withdrawal of 0.199 MGD of comingled groundwater and collected
stormwater.
Gauging of recently installed groundwater monitoring wells on the RDU Odd Fellows tract
document only very minor impacts have occurred to the regional crystalline rock aquifer as a
result of decades of dewatering of the Triangle Quarry pit. Although fractured and strongly
foliated, the crystalline rock mass actively being mined at the Triangle Quarry, and that to
be mined on the expansions site, exhibit low hydraulic transmissivity, resulting in very low
groundwater infiltration rates.
Based on historical pit dewatering data and measurement of static groundwater levels
encountered in recently installed monitoring wells, we do not anticipate any adverse effect to
the single (Dunn residence) domestic water supply well (identified on the Site Plan Map) which
is located within 500 feet of the proposed pit excavation area. A permanent groundwater
observation well (PMW-1) has been installed near the southeast corner of the Dunn property
boundary (see Site Plan Maps). Periodic monitoring of the static groundwater elevation within
this permanent well and the previously mentioned temporary wells (OW-1, OW-2, OW-3, and
OW-4) will allow observation and documentation of any groundwater fluctuations as
development of the proposed new mine pit progresses. Measured groundwater elevation
data will be reported to NC DEQ DEMLR on such frequency as deemed necessary by
DEMLR/DWR once the modified Mining Permit is issued. (Note: The aforementioned
groundwater observation wells were approved by (and constructed in accordance with the well
construction standards administered by) the North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
Reference the enclosed Well Construction Permit and Well Construction Record (GW-1) forms.)
Once mining commences on the expansion site, should monitoring well data conclusively prove
adverse impacts have occurred (groundwater surface lowered to an elevation to render the
Dunn residence well inoperative), Wake Stone will take steps as necessary to mitigate the loss
of service of the Dunn's well, up to and including installation of a replacement well.
(Refer to hydrogeological assessment by GMA, Inc. and well construction permit and
completion records as filed with NC DWR appended to this application booklet.)
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) from
the Stormwater Program. In addition, the applicant is required to register water use with the Division
of Water Resources, Ground Water Management Branch, if the operation withdraws more than 10,000
gallons per day and needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources, Ground Water
Management Branch, if the operation lies in a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000
gallons per day.
Reference attached Certificate of Coverage NCG0200001.
-11-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020001
STORMWATER AND WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Wake Stone Corp
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and/or wastewater, as provided in the original Certificate
of Coverage (COC), or subsequent COC modification, from a facility located at:
Triangle Quarry
222 Star Ln
Cary
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as Crabtree Creek, class C;NSW water(s) in the Neuse River Basin(s) in
accordance with the stormwater pollution management requirements, monitoring and reporting
requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No.
NCG020000 as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective October 1, 2015.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain effective for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day October 1, 2015.
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM
Director, Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
Reference attached Cover Sheets for NC DAQ Air Permit No. 043861115.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Triangle Quarry currently utilizes two 8,000-gallon capacity water trucks in the control of haul
road and stockyard fugitive dust emissions. Fugitive emission from plant processes (crushers,
sizing screens, and conveyor transfer points) are controlled via the application of water sprays,
or screen enclosures. The same control methodologies will be employed for the proposed
expanded pit operation.
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-
of-way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions.
Note that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit
boundary or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a
wider buffer may be needed depending on site conditions. Show all buffer locations and widths
on the mine map(s).
Proposed permanent buffers are illustrated on the accompanying Site Plan and Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan drawings.
• Old Reedy Creek Road Right -of -Way: A 100' unexcavated buffer is proposed along the
Old Reedy Creek Road right-of-way property boundary. (Earthen berm construction,
E&SC structures, and security fencing will occur within this buffer.)
• Dunn Property and northern boundary with Umstead State Park: A 100' unexcavated
buffer is proposed along these adjoining properties. (Earthen berm construction, E&SC
structures, and security fencing will occur within this buffer.)
• Crabtree Creek: A 100' (as measured from the property line/centerline of Crabtree
Creek) undisturbed buffer is proposed.
(Pursuant to and in accordance with the Raleigh Durham International Airport Authority's
proposed security fencing plan, fencing will likely be installed within the 100'
unexcavated buffer along Old Reedy Creek Road and the Dunn and Umstead State
Park boundaries.) Should RDU proceed with their proposed security fencing plan prior to
Mining Permit issuance, installed fencing will be according to their proposed design. Should
RDU elect not to proceed with the proposed fencing plan, Wake Stone will install appropriate
security fencing to prevent inadvertent public entry into the mine site. A conceptual fencing
design is illustrated on the Site Plan drawing set.
-12-

NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Issue Date: August 30, 2013
Expiration Date: July 31, 2021
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
AIR PERMIT NO.04386R15
Effective Date: August 30, 2013
Replaces Permit: 04386R14
To construct and operate air emission source(s) and/or air cleaning device(s), and for the
discharge of the associated air contaminants into the atmosphere in accordance with the provisions
of Article 21 B of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina (NCGS) as amended, and other
applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
Wake Stone Corporation - Triangle Quarry
222 Star Lane
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Permit Class: Small
Facility ID# 9200409
(the Permittee) is hereby authorized to construct and operate the air emissions sources and/or air
cleaning devices and appurtenances described below:
Emission Emission Source Control Control System
Source ID Description System ID Description
,Non -Metallic Mineral Processing Plant, utilizing water suppression with no other control
;device, including:
ES -Crushers (NSPS) ;crushing operations N/A j N/A
ES -Conveyors (NSPS) conveyor operations N/A N/A
I ES -Screens (NSPS) iscreening operations j N/A� N/A
in accordance with the completed application 9200409.13A received August 21, 2013 including any
plans, specifications, previous applications, and other supporting data, all of which are filed with the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) and are
incorporated as part of this permit.
This permit is subject to the following specified conditions and limitations including any
TESTING REPORTING, OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet
may be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within
the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all
buffer locations and widths on the mine map(s).
Pursuant to NCDEMLR and NCDWR program policies, a minimum 50'
undisturbed buffer will be maintained between mining related activities and jurisdictional
wetlands and waters. All jurisdictional wetlands and waters are identified on the
accompanying USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination plat and NC DWR Neuse
River Buffer Determination. No jurisdictional wetland or waters impacts are proposed at
this time. No Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts are proposed with the exception of
allowable impacts associated with construction of the proposed bridge for access to the pit
expansion area.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
minimum 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
Analyses of soil and decomposed rock material encountered during exploration drilling indicate
overburden cut slope stability will be attained through establishment of 2 horizontal to 1
vertical gradients. During overburden removal, cut slopes will be established at 2HAV
gradient and stabilized with vegetative cover as soon as practicable. Should differing
soil/saprolite conditions encountered during overburden removal warrant a different slope
arrangement, necessary adjustments to final gradient will be made as such conditions are
encountered. Given the proposed setback distance between the permit boundaries and the
top of any proposed cut slope (reference Site development plan maps), the risk of landslide or
slope instability is not of concern.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s) for all fill slopes (berms, waste piles, overburden
disposal areas, etc), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any
benches and/or slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the method of
final stabilization.
See Site Plan drawings for typical perimeter berm construction (cross sectional) details.
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be
provided on the mine map(s).
See 6.a. above: Overburden cut slopes are proposed to be established at 2H:1V. Provisions
will be made for retention of a 12' wide safety bench between the toe of overburden cut slopes
and the top of rock cut faces.
See Site Plan drawings for typical overburden cut slope (cross sectional) details.
d. In hard rock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
See Site Plan drawings for proposed typical pit bench details.
The new pit will be developed with 50' face heights, with 12' wide safety ledge retained
between benches.
-13-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
In the case of the Triangle Quarry expansion project proposed for the RDU Odd Fellows tract, only one
such neighboring dwelling house (Dunn residence) and one such public road (Old Reedy Creek Road)
are located within 300' of any currently proposed or potential future mine excavation area. No public,
commercial, or industrial buildings are located within 300' of the currently proposed, or potential
future pit development area. As illustrated on the accompanying site development plan maps and
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan maps, a 15' high vegetated earthen berm is to be constructed along
the property boundaries bordering the Dunn residence, Old Reedy Creek Road, and Umstead State
Park. Once completed, this berm (and associated setback distances) will prevent the possibility of
any physical hazard, and minimize any visual and sound impacts, that might be associated with
development of the mine site.
As in the currently operating Triangle Quarry, blasting activities will be conducted in strict adherence
to standard industry practices designed to minimize air blasts and ground vibrations, and prevent the
occurrence of fly rock. (See response to Question 11.)
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
Protection against inadvertent public entry along any high wall area, and the mine site in general, will
be provided by the proposed vegetated earthen berm to be constructed along Old Reedy Creek Road
frontage and the Dunn and Umstead State Park property boundaries. Additionally, fencing will be
installed within the unexcavated buffer area retained between the outside berm toe and the
property/permit boundary. Specific fence design will either be that proposed under the RDUAA's
security fencing plan or Wake Stone will install appropriate security fencing to prevent inadvertent
public entry into the mine site. Either fence design will limit inadvertent public entry into the mine
site.
Vegetated earthen berm construction will be initiated as soon as possible upon issuance of the
modified mining permit. Installation of fencing will be dependent upon final resolution of RDUAA's
security fencing plan and/or timing of the issuance of the mining permit modification.
-14-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No X.
If yes, how will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
Examination of exploration drilling core samples indicates the presence of trace amounts of
pyrite within the bedrock to be mined. The amount of pyrite present is similar to that occurring
in other bedrock deposits throughout the piedmont of North Carolina. Due to the very low
background pyrite content, generation of "acid water" is not anticipated.
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or
other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map(s) and provide cross -
sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
As illustrated on accompanying site development maps and within the Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan, Wake Stone intends to construct a 15' high visual barrier berm along the Old
Reedy Creek Road, Dunn Property, and Umstead State Park boundary (limited to the area west
of the existing lake commonly referred to as "Foxcroft Lake"). This berm will be installed
during the initial stages of site development in order to provide immediate visual screening.
The visual barrier berm will be planted with grasses (for soil/slope stabilization) and perhaps
native tree and/or shrub species for esthetic purposes.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
Since Wake Stone Corporation's Triangle Quarry began operations in 1981, there has been no
evidence of it having an adverse effect on Umstead Park or its visitation. In fact, it has often
been touted as the state's most visited park. Please see the attached visitation records
supplied by the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation. Anecdotally, we most often
hear "we did not know a quarry was even there."
Visibility:
Although Old Reedy Creek Road is utilized by pedestrians and bicyclists as a Park point of entry
via the multi -use trail system, the vegetated visual barrier berm planned along this
Permit/property boundary will mitigate quarry visibility concerns. Similarly, the berm planned
along the common boundary between the Odd Fellows tract and the Umstead Park will provide
visual screening of the operation for those park visitors that might utilize this non -trail section
of the park. These berms, combined with the proposed fencing, will prevent inadvertent public
entry into the quarry operation by park visitors.
Noise:
In planning for the RDU tract expansion of the Triangle Quarry pit, Wake Stone has included
provisions for minimizing potential noise impacts on park visitors. Construction of the visual
barrier/noise attenuation vegetated earthen berms is one such provision. Another such
provision is inclusion of concrete block walls as an integral part of the proposed north pit
perimeter road improvements. Likewise, the connector bridge to be constructed across
Crabtree Creek will be located as remote to the park property as possible given existing
site/topography conditions (reference site maps for bridge location). No increase in quarry
generated noise is anticipated above the historic levels.
-15-

Umstead Park Visitation Data
2000-2020
3/25/2020
Park
Year
Visitation
Y-O-Y Change
MUM
2000
404,973
MUM
2001
401,633
(3,340)
MUM
2002
387,492
(14,141)
MUM
2003
426,515
39,023
MUM
2004
477,475
50,960
MUM
2005
560,379
82,904
MUM
2006
596,793
36,414
MUM
2007
612,411
15,618
MUM
2008
722,732
110,321
MUM
2009
782,411
59,679
MUM
2010
876,993
94,582
MUM
2011
881,180
4,187
MUM
2012
1,175,077
293,897
MUM
2013
1,154,632
(20,445)
MUM
2014
1,293,063
138,431
MUM
2015
1,342,650
49,587
MUM
2016
1,847,260
504,610
MUM
2017
1,538,830
(308,430)
MUM
2018
1,145,568
(393,262)
MUM
2019
951,111
(194,457)
MUM
2020*
215,871
(735,240)
*Data includes visitation from January 1 - March 23. 2020
Source: North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation
2,000,000
1,800,000
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
Umstead Park Visitation History
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Year

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
11. Will explosives be used? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Depending on the mine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information may be
required on the blasting program (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest offsite
occupied structure(s) to the proposed excavation(s) on the mine map and indicate its approximate
distance to the proposed excavation.
ANFO and emulsion blasting agents have been utilized for many years for production blasting at the
Triangle Quarry. All blasting agents are brought on -site just prior to blasting and loaded in blast
holes from contract bulk dispensing truck. No blasting agents are stored on -site. Blast hole drill
logs are used in conjunction with laser face profiling and crushed stone stemming material to
custom load each blast hole. Detonation of blasts is by electronic blasting caps utilizing a
computerized timing system to maximize control of flying rocks, air blasts and ground vibrations. A
seismograph is used to monitor each blast at the nearest offsite occupied structure. These
procedures ensure well controlled blasts and greatly reduce the potential for flying rocks or
excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
In addition, Wake Stone frequently uses Dyno Nobel, a nationally recognized explosives and blasting
consulting firm, to assist us with our blasting. Using data collected from our current blasting
program at the Triangle quarry, Dyno Nobel performed an analysis of expected air blasts and ground
vibrations that might be expected for blasting within the new pit expansion on the RDU Odd
Fellows tract. Their analysis confirms that blast events can be designed and performed to keep air
blasts and ground vibrations in the expanded pit well below allowable limits for structures as close
as 500' from the blast site. Dyno Nobel's blasting analysis summary report is included with this
application.
12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
Indicate the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Fuels and lubricants are stored at the existing quarry fuel/lube station. This covered structure is
provided with a secondary containment wall and a roof covering. No fuel or lubricants will be stored
on the RDU expansion site. The Triangle Quarry's mobile fuel/lube truck will be utilized for any fueling
operations required on the expansion site in a similar fashion as used in the long-standing existing
Triangle Quarry mining operation
-16-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
1. Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or
establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other
pollution. This information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with
the information provided on the mine map(s). In addition, design information, including typical
cross -sections, of any permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the
location(s) of all permanent channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Once depleted of mineral reserves, both pits will be allowed to fill with groundwater/surface water
runoff to create lakes with water surface elevation at approximately +280' MSL. All plant components
will be disassembled and removed. All stockpiles will be removed and the plant and stockpile areas
graded to provide positive drainage. Bare land surfaces will be provided with vegetative cover
according to future land use plans. Process water settling ponds and obsolete sediment basins will be
backfilled and stabilized with vegetation.
Post mining, portions of the current Triangle Quarry property (plant and stockpile areas) will likely be
developed for commercial/office/residential uses. Opportunities will exist for creation of recreational
facilities such as hiking/biking trails, nature trails, scenic overlooks, and expansion of the Capital area
greenway trail network, as will the potential to incorporate portions of the mine site into Umstead
State Park.
As stated in the Mining Commission's Final Decision dated April 3, 1981, Wake Stone will continue to
be obligated to offer to donate to the State the quarry site located on the property owned by Wake
Stone. "The term, "quarry site", shall include the entire pit as it exists after quarrying has been
completed, a strip extending at least 50 feet from the top of the slope of the pit on all sides (see
reclamation plan for the requirements applying to the slope), and a reasonable area to connect the pit
and surrounding strip to Umstead Park, constituting a total area of at least 75 acres."
"When all quarryable stone has been removed from all of the land belonging to or controlled by Wake
Stone Corporation during the period of its quarrying operations and which lies between Umstead Park
and Interstate 40, it shall be the duty of Wake Stone to notify the State of this fact. Upon receipt of
such notice, the State shall have six months within which it may elect to have Wake Stone convey the
quarry site to the State. If the State elects to have Wake Stone convey the quarry site to the State, it
shall notify Wake Stone of such election within said six month period. All notices shall be by certified
mail with return receipt requested. If the State fails to make an election within said six month period
or shall elect not to accept a conveyance of the quarry site, the option shall thereupon terminate and
Wake Stone shall have no further obligation to convey the quarry site to the State."
Since the onset of its investigation into the viability of establishing a quarry pit expansion on the RDU
Odd Fellows tract, Wake Stone Corporation has recognized the post -mining value of the expanded
Triangle Quarry site for recreational purposes. Early discussions with stakeholder groups included the
presentation of Conceptual Plans illustrating potential future outdoor recreation -based development
once mining is completed. The company recognizes that this project will provide an opportunity for a
unique partnership between the company, the RDUAA, Wake County, and the State of North Carolina.
The details of such a partnership, and how the depleted mine site might ultimately dovetail into the
greater Umstead State Park/Capital Area Greenway system, is yet to be determined.
As detailed in our Option and Lease Agreement, Wake Stone has committed to RDUAA to reclaim the
Odd Fellows property with features such as overlooks, greenway trails, parking areas, pit security
fence, and connectivity to the Triangle quarry. The precise location of these features will be
determined by RDUAA and Wake Stone upon termination of mining activity and the lease interest. A
conceptual rendering illustrating potential post -mining reclamation of the combined quarry site is
provided as WSC Site Plan Sheet 10 in the site development plan set.
-17-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross-section(s) through the proposed body(s) of water. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes ❑ No ❑.
If yes, specify species.
At the time of final reclamation, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission will be contacted
for assistance in determining the suitability of the post reclamation lakes for fish stocking.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
Suitable fencing or concrete block walls, and warning signs will be erected along the property
boundary where proximity to high walls constitutes a significant safety hazard.
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine
waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for
such areas must be provided on the reclamation map.
Other than the currently existing earthen berms, and those proposed for construction pursuant to this
modification application, no other overburden storage piles, spoil banks, or other such mine waste
areas exist or are anticipated. Earthen berms constructed of overburden, have, or will be constructed
concurrent with mining. As such areas are completed, they will be stabilized and vegetated and
remain as permanent features at the site.
a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
The processing equipment will be disassembled and removed from the property. The plant and
stockpile areas and internal roadways will be graded to stable configurations and seeded with various
grasses, wildlife food species and tree seedlings, or covered with crushed stone to prevent erosion and
sedimentation. The secondary plant and stockpile areas are likely to be developed for
commercial/residential/office future uses.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, identify such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and
ditch line stabilization.
The paved entrance road, scales entrance and exit roads, and the paved office parking area will
remain on site or be incorporated into future commercial/residential/office development projects.
Stone surfaced pit perimeter and access roadways will remain for use in future (yet to be determined)
recreation opportunities. Any needed additional ditch lines not currently existing will be stabilized
with riprap and vegetative linings as necessary.
��

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables,
or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off -site generated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written approval
from the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land
Resources and either the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a
disposal permit has been issued by DWM for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to
this application. All temporary and permanent refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated on
the mine map(s) and reclamation map, along with a list of items to be disposed in said areas.
Scrap metal, junk machinery, cables, and other such mining generated wastes are currently
disposed of off -site in appropriate landfills or recycling facilities. It is anticipated that this practice
will continue throughout the future of the operation, and that upon final reclamation, no such
materials will remain on site.
7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for year-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and
type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings
is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the NC Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service,
specialists and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest
Resources at North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the NC Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services;
f. N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
g. N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre):
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre):
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Seed Types: Seeding Dates: Seeding Rates:
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF
ANCHORING:
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS — TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Refer to the following typical re -vegetation plan.
Revegetation a /or refore atplan approved by:
Signature Date
Print Name avi Lee
Title Environmental Supervisor
Agency Wake Stone Corporation
-19-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
TYPICAL RE -VEGETATION PLAN
Site Preparation
Land surfaces will be graded and shaped as necessary to create topography applicable to the
final use of the land. Slopes in unconsolidated material will be graded to a stable slope not to
exceed two horizontal to one vertical. Loose rocks, woody material, and other obstructions
that would interfere with the establishment of vegetation will be removed and either buried
or properly disposed of off -site. Surface runoff will be controlled by use of diversions and
terraces to allow discharge through protected outlets.
Seed Bed Preparation
Lime and fertilizer will be incorporated into the soil to a depth of three to four inches on
areas where conventional equipment can be used. On slopes steeper than 2:1, soils will be
scarified along the contour for seed and nutrient retention. Lime and fertilizer will be applied
according to soil tests for the areas being re -vegetated, generally at a rate of 1,000 lbs. of 10-
10-10 and 2,000 lbs. of lime per acre. Newly seeded areas will be mulched with small grain
straw spread evenly over the surface at a rate of 1.5 to 2.0 tons per acre. On steep slope areas
not accessible to seeding equipment, seed, nutrients, and mulch will be applied by hand.
Re -vegetation Species
Seed mixtures typically include some combination, depending on the season, of the
following: fescue, rye grain, bahiagrass, Kobe lespedeza, Korean lespedeza, Sericea lespedeza,
bicolor lespedeza, white ladino clover, partridge pea, and native warm season grasses.
Fall or early spring plantings will utilize 100 lbs. fescue and 50 lbs. rye grain per acre. Late
spring plantings may include up to 40 lbs. Kobe/Korean lespedeza per acre where desirable to
supplement deer browse. Native warm season grasses will be utilized along with Kobe/Korean
lespedeza to enhance feeding and nesting areas for wildlife. Sericea lespedeza will be planted
at a rate of 20 to 40 lbs. per acre in combination with fescue when planting draughty soils or
steep slopes. Clover will be added to deer browse areas at a rate of 3-5 lbs. per acre in fall or
early spring plantings.
When using lespedeza species in fall plantings, non -scarified seed will be used. Scarified
seed will be used in spring plantings. When using clover in wildlife plantings, inoculated seeds
will be used.
Loblolly pine and red cedar seedlings will be planted at selected sites to provide visual
screens. Shrubs and Mast -bearing hardwoods such as those of the white oak subgenera may
also be planted to enhance wildlife habitat.
-20-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be used to establish an appropriate bond (based upon a range
of $500 to $S, 000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approved by the
Department to be affected during the life of the mining permit. Please insert the approximate acreage,sf
CATEGORY
Tailings/Sediment Ponds:
Stockpiles:
Wastepiles:
Processing Area/Haul Roads:
Mine Excavation:
Other:
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.:
(TOTAL PERMITTED AC.:
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE*
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
Ac.
Ac.)
RECLAMATION
COST
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existing excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be graded for positive drainage where measures
will be needed to prevent offsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsite watercourses and wetlands.
a) Internal Drainage Ac.
b) Positive Drainage Ac. X $1,500.00 = $
SUBTOTAL COST: $
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: $ X Permit Life Provided by Applicant (Life of the Mining
Operation or Life of Lease from Public Entity (in Years)):
INFLATION COST: $
Reference Attached Towne Bank (formerly Paragon Bank) $1,000,000.00 Assignment of
Savings Account #44102
—21—

,.I
i
March 30 2020
i
i
Wake Stone Corporation
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, NC 27545-9651
Certificate of Deposit #6600044100
Dear Gentlemen:
Please accept this letter as confirmation that your CD # here at TowneBank has a current balance of
$1,043,159.29.
Please note our official name change from Paragon Bank a Division of TowneBank to TowneBank on
06/10/2019.
Please feel free to contact me for any further information needed.
Regards, J
V—
J has S. Towles
enior Vice President
Ph. 919-534-7390
Email: iohn.towlesPtownebank.net

/Ceui7egl �or bank narv3c ehan9e '
Old- Parapon Bank A VJilS/an ai 7ownc Rank
Mew- Townc Bank
ASSIGNMENT OF SAVINGS ACCOUNT
This Assignment, made and entered into the 30 day of March 2020, by
and between wah --knc Corp�ralten of 6921 Yn;�n>dalc a/vd.
(applicant) (address)
City of
kn, nfda/c , County of w" xc _,State of
North Carolina and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality; and
WHEREAS, The undersigned Wakc Sianc Carparat/ah
(applicant)
(hereinafter referred to as "Operator") is desirous of engaging in mining operations in the State of
North Carolina and such mining operations are subject to the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971,
Article 7, Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, NCGS 74-50 requires that mine operators obtain a permit from the Department
of Environmental Quality (hereinafter referred to as "Department") before engaging in mining
operations, and NCGS 74-54 requires that a surety bond in favor of the State be maintained or
other security be filed with the Department, in connection
with said permit; and
%ownc
WHEREAS, Operator has a savings account in (bank name)
at
d535- Glenwood/ Avenue City of County of
(address) 66 00044 / 0
wake State of North Carolina, Savings Account No.
and
WHEREAS, NCGS 74-54 authorizes the Department to accept from Operator an
assignment of a savings account in a North Carolina bank, In lieu of a surety bond;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the Department accepting an
assignment of said savings account in lieu of a surety bond, the undersigned Operator does
hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over to the Department of Environmental Quality
one mWion dollars ($ Apo oc0. OG ) of the sums on
(dollar amount written) Xo/cigh
%wnc Dank ,City of
deposit in his name in --�
(bank name)
County of wake State of North Carolina, Savings Account No.
0000044 i0 and further authorizes
Tawnc P.ank
(bank name)
to pay over to the Department of Environmental Quality the above stlm of
one dollars ($, !. 000, 000. 00 )
(dollar amount written)
out of the above money deposit in the above account in his name.
Rev. Oct. 2017

The condition of the foregoing assignment is that if the assignor Operator conducts the
mining operations faithfully, honestly, and lawfully and in compliance with the requirements of the
Mining Act of 1971 and applicable Rules and Regulations adopted pursuant thereto, then this
assignment shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. Compliance with
the requirement of the Mining Act of 1971 and applicable Rules and Regulations shall be
determined by the Department.
This assignment is made and the '-crfic{ dcposif
(passbook, deposit book, etc.)
is to be held by the Department as collateral security for all direct or indirect liabilities of the
assignor Operator to the assignee Department that may arise by reason of the Mining Act 1971,
Article 7, Chapter 74 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This assignment shall be direct authorization to Ta wno Bank
(bank name)
to pay said sum to Department on demand by Department.
_"001 , zl�
/' RA14F i ature o leant)
-a0 Tq,4 ti
Sworn to before me this 3�
mday of AtoR�,,- o 20
Notary .Public
couN"t"t My Com . sion Expires 'z - u-'Lf
(Affix Seat)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY BANK
The foregoing Assignment of Savings Account is hereby ack wledged this3© day of
M*-c k , 20 s0. It is further acknowledged that funds in the above mentioned
account shall not be disbursed except to the assignee, Department of EQ while the assignment
remains in effect. I A I j
This the 30 day of e,c 20» by
(mailing address of bank)
agent for bank)
Sworn to before this 13C) day of r'cy) , 20
Notary Pubic 3
4,1'M'gA,/���'�ii
My Commission Expires _k:�Y �= v Notary Public
(A x Seal) wake z
e�,. �ountY
ADDRESS: 9T -\�
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources %,,yCARo�
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Rev. Oct. 2017

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "Notice" form, or a facsimile thereof, attached to this application must be sent certified or registered
mail, return receipt requested, to:
(1) the chief administrative officer of each county and municipality in which any part of the
permitted area is located as indicated on the mine map(s);
(2) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the
lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that
are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s); and
(3) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek, stream,
river, or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an adjoining
tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners
of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the mining
permit boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s). "Highway" means a road that has four lanes
of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
The only exception to the above method of giving notice is if another means of notice is approved in advance
by the Director, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources.
A copy of a tax map (or other alternative acceptable to the Department) must be mailed with the completed
"Notice" form (the proposed overall permit boundaries and the names and locations of all owners of
record of lands adjoining said boundaries must be clearly denoted on the tax map).
The "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be completed, notarized and submitted to
the Department, with the remainder of the completed application form, before the application will be
considered complete.
NOTES:
THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS FOR NEW MINING PERMITS
AND ALL MODIFICATIONS OF A MINING PERMIT TO ADD LAND TO THE PERMITTED AREA,
AS REQUIRED BY NCGS 74-50(bl).
SEE THE NEXT TWO PAGES FOR THE "NOTICE" FORM AND THE "AFFIDAVIT OF
NOTIFICATION"
-22-

Ns CO
z Wake Stone Corporation
www.wakestonecorp.com
Quarry Phone Numbers: Locations:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale 6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
919/677-0050 - Triangle 222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
919/775-7349 - Moncure 9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
252/985-4411 - Nash County 7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach 3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Mr. Michael Languth, CEO
Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority
PO Box 80001
Raleigh, North Carolina 27623-0001
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mr. Languth:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
David F. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

101111 Call
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation
(Applicant Name)
will apply on or about,
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority
Attn: Michael Landguth, CEO
PO Box 80001
Raleigh, North Carolina 27623-0001
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-23-
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

e pHt Cp4�O0
s
i Wake Stone Corporation
www.wakestonecorp.com
Quarry Phone Numbers: Locations:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale 6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
919/677-0050 - Triangle 222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
919/775-7349 - Moncure 9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
252/985-4411 - Nash County 7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach 3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Lloyd T. Edwards and Ellen J. Edwards White
762 Mudham Road
Wendell, North Carolina 27591
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mr. Edward and Mrs. White:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
Davi F. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation will apply on or about
(Applicant Name) (Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Lloyd T. Edwards and Ellen J. Edwards White
762 Mudham Road
Wendell, North Carolina 27591
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-24-
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

Wake Stone Corporation
Quarry Phone Numbers:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale
919/677-0050 - Triangle
919/775-7349 - Moncure
252/985-4411 - Nash County
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach
Betsy Carol Beals
2335 Old Reedy Creek Road
Cary, North Carolina 27513-2113
www.wakestonecorp.com
Locations:
6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mrs. Beals:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
David F. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

101111 Call
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation will apply on or about,
(Applicant Name)
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Betsy Carol Beals
2335 Old Reedy Creek Road
Cary, North Carolina 27513-2113
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-25-
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

9
Stone Corporation�. �� Wake
Quarry Phone Numbers:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale
919/677-0050 - Triangle
919/775-7349 - Moncure
252/985-4411 - Nash County
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach
www.wakestonecorp.com
Locations:
6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Mr. Randall L. and Tamara G. Dunn
2232 Old Reedy Creek Road
Cary, North Carolina 27513-2111
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dunn:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
i
Dav F. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

II,1171nall
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation
(Applicant Name)
will apply on or about,
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Randall L. and Tamara G. Dunn
2232 Old Reedy Creek Road
Cary, North Carolina 27513-2111
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-26-
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

C 'O
4
n
Wake Stone Corporation
Quarry Phone Numbers:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale
919/677-0050 - Triangle
919/775-7349 - Moncure
252/985-4411 - Nash County
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach
www.wakestonecorp.com
Locations:
6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Mr. Dwayne Patterson, Director
North Carolina State Parks
121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1615
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mr. Patterson:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
David F. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

IL1111 Call
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation
(Applicant Name)
will apply on or about,
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Dwayne Patterson, Director
North Carolina State Parks
121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1615
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-27-
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

OAS CO,
g 9
v
w a
3 r �,,,. Wake Stone Corporation
www.wakestonecorp.com
Quarry Phone Numbers: Locations:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale 6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
919/677-0050 - Triangle 222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
919/775-7349 - Moncure 9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
252/985-4411 - Nash County 7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach 3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Amy Neidringhaus, District Engineer
Wake County District Office
1575 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Ms. Neidringhaus:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
David .Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
IL1C171 M CO-1
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation
(Applicant Name)
will apply on or about,
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
Amy Neidringhaus, District Engineer
NC DOT Div. 5 Wake Co. Dist. Office
1575 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
-29-
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

4o4S CO,
e 4
s
Wake Stone Corporation
Quarry Phone Numbers:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale
919/677-0050 - Triangle
919/775-7349 - Moncure
252/985-4411 - Nash County
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach
www.wakestonecorp.com
Locations:
6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
March 30, 2020
By Certified Mail
Mr. David Ellis, Wake County Manager
PO Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Subject: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry
Mining Permit Modification
Dear Mr. Ellis:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 74-50 (b.1.) of the Mining Act of 1971, we are by this letter
notifying you of our intent to submit a Mining Permit Modification Application to the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEMLR).
These application materials will detail our plans for increasing the permitted areas and expansion of the
existing Triangle Quarry onto the property governed by our Mineral Lease Agreement with the Raleigh -
Durham Airport Authority (see enclosed site map). We anticipate submittal of this application to
NCDEMLR on or before April 2, 2020.
Once submitted to NCDEMLR, the Mining Permit Application materials will be available for
public review and comment. You may also call our corporate office at [phone] and either Samuel
T. Bratton, President and CEO or I will answer any question you may have concerning this mine site
expansion.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
ADaviF. Lee
Head Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures

II,1171nall
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(bI) of The Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Wake Stone Corporation
(Applicant Name)
will apply on or about,
(Date)
to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit,
X a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine stone on 329 acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
North of Interstate 40 northwest of Cary, NC off/near road Old Reedy Creek Road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
in Wake County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s)
to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the
application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest
exists relative to G. S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period
specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
919-266-1100 (Sam Bratton) . For information on the mining permit application review process, please
contact the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant
written comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application
review process until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
David Ellis, Wake County Manager
Wake County Office
PO Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact
& Company Name, if Applicable)
Wake Stone Corporation
��
Attn: Sam Bratton
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
(Address of Applicant)

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
I, Samuel T. Bratton , an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant, for a new Mining
Permit, or a modification of an existing Mining Permit to add land to the permitted area, from the N.C. Department
of Environmental Quality, being first duly sworn, do hereby attest that the following are all known owners of
record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary (including,
where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners
of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and that notice
of the pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested,
to said owners of record at their addresses shown below, such notice being given on a form provided by the
Department:
(Adjoining Landowner Name)
Michael Landguth, CEO Raleigh -Durham Airport
Lloyd T. Edwards
Betsy Carol Beals
Randall L. and Tamara G. Dunn
Dwayne Patterson — NC State Parks
(Address)
Raleigh,
North Carolina
Wendell, North Carolina
Cary,
North Carolina
Cary,
North Carolina
Raleigh,
North Carolina
Amy Neidringhaus — NC DOT Raleigh, North Carolina
I do also attest that the following individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
which any part of the permitted area is located and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be
mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to said office at the following address:
(Chief Administrative Officer Name) (Address)
[i.e.: City Manager, County Manager, Mayor, etc.]
David Ellis, Wake County Manager Raleigh, North Carolina
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land
that are adjoining the mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the
applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality
in which any part of the permitted area is located in compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50(bI) and 15A NCAC 5B
.0004(d). I understand that it is the responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts of mailing showing that
the above notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
r--�2 /l �" 3/:'///ao
Signature of Applicant or Agent Date
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following information:
Name of applicant: Samuel T. Bratton
Title of person executing Affidavit President and CEO
I, 1V1(*&k1A#X le
State of North Caro ina, do hereby certify th
appeared before me this day and under oath
Witnessh d d n to sea is 3,
Notary: s
expires:? 7
a Notar' Public of the County of YVo ee
A T l r�M�- -
iat the above Affidavit was made by him/her.
day of 20 U) .
my Commission
-30-
Wake County
My Cn�1sspn Expire

CERTIFIED MAILI,., RECEIPT C3 m
i(Domestic Mail . m
p
A
Lr
ry w,
C3 052E m c«aaed n en F»
m Poaasa 3 oq i16 n s $3."
N'I (tlw3bac aW M1, I
Gemmed Fee $U.Illl S ❑rwnnc+� P�aoA t $0 @0��
C3Posbnmk p ❑tram P-wo,W-eaiq 1 $0. +6--
p Return Receipt Fee $11 Ij113 Here O ❑CarsIYdA IBeeabd Dr F
O (Endoreemeel Requfmd) p 0.00
p �db.A 9lp�n hPRa f
` e �OetiverypF�ed, p ❑Nwu Sp�aaPwY. D.Y+,ri . I
p bl. _
7
N TotelPoetaged5@gs 03/31/2020-o
p To eM Fw
E $7.60
rvmc,t
ll L �- Tamtua G. � T
�`^n_...... ...._ �o�{d T �dwvds + Eden
C3 ei-----...._------.....-_......_ .._.__..-- p s�__e and -- - ry o. �23Dldterdy, Cftou.. 42 d rv7b1- �°N' rwa - --.....-------
NC a�S13—Z111 ail
U.S. Postal Service"
o RECEIPT'.
rvice
CERTIFIED MAILru .. rv(DomesticOnly;
C3m
s R m p�y.,,
O
rn
FALEk61 ` 2 i A L,. 1t ry CAFYn N ;.2t 1p
mCartflleUMall » $3,55 (52E p ;I�
m Potty'
- E d ta.a aoc.ecn. ) U6 Ln c
❑ri.r nfwWpvracoWj t Cenlfted Fee $0.110
p ❑wean flxakrt l,Dceatl t $0 QQ PosNmtk at - -
p CCa+lsaawuwabta ,-- 4_$0_.90 Here p (Endo—FI RagWZ $0, 1111
C3padn slx+waR.maa t___$ _fifl._ C3 -
mame
�Amn SWuam Beeakrd o,l�r i Residcted Delivery Fee
p P-t p C3(CnMoraemant flegvired)
s E1.20 -0 $1.
'n 03/� 211211
p onaAp�ac� L" �1 / trl _Toxtel P�lege dFeea .$
EOk. 81--i.�...lik!fp0!. --- ry rPoe°xrb. �j_3_,5 Q d h�tui
p L9ae byls;7lP+is"-----�-G---a%va3-�/------------ p 41VA iu`. rite--.....o?7!
i�✓ 1¢ oh ...............
ry t Ik: p SEser. Apr.N ?3
m
..o
ul •.
t
.
Ln EMIMMIMMY
ry
r^
M
m
KHL&iblfr
m
ry
:.-
p
p
6 (152E
m P.wge
Ln
m
sa Poge E S2.E5 (16
")
CellNled Fee $0. on
C3 Certllled Fee
p
p
( i - Postmark
Re Wm Receipt Fea gil.On Hyre
C3 Return Recelpl Fee
O (EtMoreamenl gegmred)
O
(Endorsement R, quead)
ResMcted DalNery Fee
p
Resiikted Delivery Fee
p (Endorsement Requiad(
p
(Endorsement Requlrvdl
SS9y1L�
,_n 71
U3/31 /2t1211
Ln Total Postage d Feas
ru E7.
Vn Telel Postage d b(. -
ru S
ry r a
nlGdn /lr2rtr 1i1Si En 1
� Srreet cNn::--��-'
r ��ryry
p Mr bQVIaI
p sraacao. �d
ry
ry
or PO Boa................
'
Ciry,le.
0523
06
Poemwk
Here
03/31/2020
E. whl',e --------------
06
Postmark
Hoe
03/31/2020
13 -AJ)3
d
052E
7 oc fit
$il, 01i
Poetmerk
$0. rlll Here
03/31/2020
V rss._kktlu.,CgX. Maria;
Sox 6w
Alr- a70oL
ra
rn
m1
ry r-
p $3. dw
m Peerage $ 06
uT r
Codified Fee $I),1111
p Postmark
p Refum Recelpd Poe $(I,011 Here
C3 (En.--m Regdired)
p Reeekled Oellvery Fee
p (Endmeertreel Wrad) -
Ln N Total Poetegad$7. .p 113/31/2020
`` r°DWa�(n� I7aNc/Son �rreo8at@Pusi•�
r o,PO--------------
Boallo./ejl
-
�C2Lt'41,a71e�P9-105

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as
may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S. 74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature:
Print Name: Michael tandauth, CEO
(Title, if applicable)
Company Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority
(If applicable)
Address: PO Box 80001
RDU Airport, NC 27623
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed:
March 25, 2019
APPLICANT:
Signature:*
Print Name: Samuel T. Bratton
Title: President and CEO
Company: Wake Stone Corporation
Mine Name: Trianiele Quarry
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed: Ar-C tt �, 2oa 0
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application.
ne original
of all
and reclamation maps, and the appropriate processing fee (see next page for tee schedule) in the forma cnecK
or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality must be sent to the
Raleigh Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-26-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S.
74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to
carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant
to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER: APPLICANT:
Signature: Signature:
Print Name: Samuel T. Bratton, CEO _
(Title, if applicable)
Company _Wake Stone Corporation
(If applicable)
Address: PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed: 6A U
Print Name: Samuel T. Bratton
Title: President and CEO
Company: Wake Stone Corporation
Mine Name: Triangle Quarry
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed:
'7t1-12 611-101? a
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
One original and five (5) copies of the completed application, six (6) copies of all location maps, mine maps
and reclamation maps, and the appropriate processing fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a
check or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality must be sent
to the Raleigh Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-31-

Appendices
• FEMA No Impact Certification Application
• Erosion and Sediment Control Design Calculations
• Hydrogeological Assessment Report
• Monitoring Well Construction Records
• USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination
• NC DWR Stream Buffer Determination
• NC DWR — Neuse River Buffer impacts analysis for
bridge
• Dyno Nobel Blasting Analysis Summary Report

FEMA No Impact Certification

TO
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
Civil Engineering • Environmental
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Telephone: [phone]
www.sungatedesign.com
Pearce, CFM
Wake County Government Environmental Services
336 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27602
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of letter
® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Change order ❑
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 04/01/2020 JOB NO. 1008-19036
ATTENTION:
RE:
Wake Stone
Crabtree Creek Crossing
No Impact Certification
the following items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
Site Plan
1
No Impact Certification - Report
1
Flood Study Checklist
1
Hec-Ras Submittal Requirements
1
Storm Water, Floodplain Management, S&EC Application
1
Project Model (Hec-Ras)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
1: 43"EMN
COPY TO:
SIGNED: William M. Hines, Jr.
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

low
WAKE Environmental
COUNTY Services
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
336 Fayetteville St P.O. Box 550
Raleigh, NC 27602
Construction Plan Application for Stormwater, Floodplain Management,
Sedimentation & Erosion Control
L PROPERTY INFORMATION
1. Project Name:
2. Address:
3. Wake County Pin #:
5. Zoning District
4. Jurisdictional Area: CC) uN fiJ,
(List municipality if applicable for S&EC)
6. River Basin: eW5C
7. County Watershed: k%iz'A1J�krC 01�tEY,
(Falls Lake, Smith Creek, Little River, Swift Creek, Jordan)
8. Total area in acres: �-y acres 9. Total property area to be disturbed in acres:
(Meuse/Cape Fear)
1 14
acres
10. Present Land Use (Check): X Non-residential Subdivision Agricultural Forest Vacant
11. Proposed Land Use/Project Type (Check): �'/% Non-residential Subdivision Lot Redevelopment
12. Recorded: Book of Maps No. �0�� S2) Page No. 0000 3 13. Property W/In FEMA Flood Zone:GM lood Soils (circle)
14. Zone: At 15. FIRM Panel No.: 0 .4� 0 16. FIRM Effective Date:S�17. Exiting Impervious (sq.ft) U
(A, AE, X)
18. New or Proposed Impervious (sq.ft) U0 O d 19. Impervious Surface of Well Lot and Access Road N (sq.ft)
II. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO PORTAL:
Copy of this application '4 Construction Plans
A. Stormwater Review: O/N
Fees — invoiced upon application (See fee schedule on web site)
*MINIMUM FEE IS $250 (based on I acre)
Subdivision Preliminary Approval Document /# Wake County Hybrid Stormwater Tool(.xls) _
Stormwater Narrative Stormwater Checklist: SW Calculations Nitrogen Export Load Calculations
Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants Application Form Operations, Maintenance, Inspection and Budget Manuel
Soil Scientist Soils Evaluation Stream Determination Letter
B. Flood Study Review:
`
Floodstudy Narrative 4 _ Flood Study Checklist "� HEC RAS Checklist "4 Flood Study Calculations
C. For Sedimentation & Erosion Control Review: hJ/ K
Erosion Control Narrative Sedimentation & Erosion Checklist Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form:
S&E Calculations DWQ, 404 and/or 401 approval document NC DOT Driveway Encroachment Agreement: _
D. Land Disturbance - Individual Lot(s) : Wake County Standard Plan or Custom Plan (circle one) . FRP form, plot plan &
application rJ / K

III. GENERAL INFORMATION
i. Property Owner. (s (speify the name of the corporation, individual, etc., who owns the property):
Name: �1<C S'ToIJt= 0of-V INN
Street Address: \ 'f D `Z ) t ,l LC C �-TGLAS
Mailing Address , O. o O
E-Mail Address:
Phone#:(q 11z)) �. Cell#:(_) Fax#:
2. Applicant* (Person to whom all cones ondence ill be sent):
Name: SP�(�l1 c L 'bjR' �oN
Firm/other: l� C �' b C 'R 0 {I � 0
Street Address ) -T 1—q ID - 2:1 SLIS
Mailing Address: P, O, ND 1 0
E-Mail Address:
Phone#: q 11 F SW.0 " 0 O Cell#: Fax#:
Relationship to Owner: \TJ-_O'r / be
*If not a resident of North Carolina, a North Carolina agent must be designated for the purpose of receiving correspondences.
IV. APPLIICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
PRINT NAME ✓� / �� �r�N
SIGNATURE i DATE 3 a 6
OWNER/PERSON FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE
V. Residential Construction Plan Review Fees:
S&E x $250.00 =
Disturbed acres (to tenth of acre)
round to nearest dollar
NO CAP / minimum fee based on I acre
*SW x $250.00 =
Disturbed acres (to tenth of acre)
round to nearest dollar
(1 O-Acre Cap or minimum of $250.00)
*Minor Flood Study please add $500.001 each crossing x 500.00 =
*Major Flood Study please add $1.000.00/ each crossing x 1,000.00 =
Total Fees Due
VI. Non -Residential Construction Plan Review Fees:
S&E x $250.00 =
Disturbed acres (to tenth of acre)
round to nearest dollar
NO CAP / minimum fee based on 1 acre
$250 (0-9 acres)
$375 (10-19 acres)
*SW x $435 (20-29 acres) _
Disturbed acres (to tenth of acre) $470 (30-39 acres)
round to nearest dollar
(50 Acre Cap) $485 (40-50 acres)
*Minor Flood Study please add $500.001 each crossing x 500.00 =
*Major Flood Study please add $1,000.00/ each crossing ___x 1,000.00 =
Total Fees Due
*Aaalies only to Wake County Jurisdictional Proiects
(form updated April 2019)
PERMIT FEES FOR STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL DUE UPON PERMIT ISSUANCE

mx
NORTH
0 60 120 180
SCALE IN FEET ' 1-60'
8522-204 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
919.845.7600 PHONE
919.845.7703 FAX
ENGR. FIRM LICENSE #F-0843
Q
Z
� J
}
Ox
xZ
YU
ao
w=
D �,
LU I`
oZ
U 0
LU Q
Z
ZW
w0
Q=)
X W
ryo
0a
H (x
O cr
ISSUED: 12 FEB 2020
RFV I RI nmsR
DRAWN BY: RPH
CHECKED BY: RPH
PROJECT: WSRDUQ
EXISTING
QUARRY ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS
1 OF 2
DWG. No. SITE 8

NO IMPACT CERTIFICATION
FOR
CRABTREE CREEK
BASIN 18 STREAM 9
WAKE STONE
BRIDGE
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
CAR0
�-e
_a SEAL _ =
26971 = _
%NGI NE�•``�G.
3/27/2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, PA
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, N. C.

Crabtree Creek — Wake Stone Bridge (latitude 35.84127 longitude-78.77225)
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared by: Sungate Design Group, PA
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, N. C. 27606
For: Wake Stone Corporation
Date: February 10, 2019
NO RISE FOR CRABTREE CREEK — Wake Stone Bridge
INTRODUCTION
Wake Stone Quarry located next to Umstead State Park in Wake County is proposing to construct a
bridge across Crabtree Creek. The proposed will be 100 feet in length with vertical abutments. The
low chord of the proposed bridge will be about 10 feet above the 100 Year water surface elevation.
Crabtree Creek is a FEMA regulated stream and is part of the Neuse River Basin. The current
Effective Study is a Detailed Study and is a re -delineation which indicates that the Effective Flood
Study is a Hec-2 model. FEMA is in the process of updating the Wake County FIS. As part of this
process, Griffith Branch is being updated using Hec-Ras to analyze the flood elevations. It is
Sungate's understanding that for a No Rise the Preliminary Flood Study can be used. Therefore,
Sungate Design (SDG) contacted NC Floodplain Mapping (NCFMP) to request the Preliminary Hec-
Ras model which we received on 11/07/2019.
The Preliminary FIRM map is 3720076600J (dated 03/31/2015). The proposed Wake Stone bridge
crossing is located at River Station 106838 in Zone AE.
DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE MODEL
Ao Yi, PE (NCFMP) sent an email to SDG on 11/07/2019 with the Preliminary Hec-Ras files
attached. SDG saved the attached Hec-Ras files on the SDG server. The original Hec-Ras files
obtained from NCFMP were created using Hec-Ras v4.1.0 and are in NAVD 88 (vertical datum).
The Hec-Ras files obtained from NCFMP were copied and used to create a Duplicate model. A
Duplicate Plan was created using the Preliminary Geometry file and Steady Flow file. SDG then ran
the Duplicate Plan on Hec-Ras v4.1.0. The water surface elevations matched the information found

in the original Preliminary Hec-Ras output from NCFMP. No negative surcharges or surcharges
greater than 1-foot were found.
CORRECTED EFFECTIVE MODEL
The Duplicate Model was saved as the Corrected Model. New cross -sections located at River
Station 106793, 106805.8, 106869.8 and 106883 were placed in the model using survey data that
was provided by Michael Baker International. Cross -sections 106793 and 106883 are located
immediately downstream and upstream of the proposed Wake Stone bridge. Cross -sections
106805.8 and 106869.8 are located at the downstream and upstream face of the proposed bridge.
The survey data was also used to update the stream channel for River Stations 106629 and 106911.
No changes to roughness coefficients for the existing cross -sections were made. No changes to
discharges were made. No changes to the Reach Boundary Conditions were made. Contraction and
expansion coefficients of 0.1 and 0.3 were used at the new River Stations 106629 and 106911.
SDG then ran the Corrected Model on Hec-Ras A.1.0. No surcharges greater than 1-foot were
found. However, negative surcharges were found. The Encroachment Stations at River Station
106911 and 111085 were revised to eliminate these negative surcharges.
REVISED MODEL
The Corrected Model was saved as the Revised Model. The proposed Wake Stone bridge was
placed at River Station 106837.9.
No changes to roughness coefficients for the existing cross -sections were made. No changes to
discharges were made. No changes to the Reach Boundary Conditions were made. Due to the
proposed Wake Stone bridge spanning the floodplain at River Station 106837.9, no changes to the
contraction and expansion coefficients were made.
SDG then ran the Revised Model on Hec-Ras v4.1.0. No negative surcharges or surcharges greater
than 1-foot were found.
RESULTS
There is no change in the water surface elevations when comparing the Revised and Corrected.
The Hec-Ras models and the following Tables included with the No Rise Certification package are
in NAVD 88.

CRABTREE CREEK - HEC-RAS MODEL:
Plan Name — Description
DTL Crabtree Crk(B I 8_Strm9) DS — Original Preliminary model from NCFMP using the 10, 25, 50,
100, FW and 500-Year Storms (Output from Hec-Ras v4.1.0).
DTL Crabtree Crk(B 18_Strm9) DS Future — Original Preliminary model from NCFMP using the 10,
25, 50, 100, FW and 500-Year Storms Future Conditions (Output from Hec-Ras v4.1.0).
DUPLICATE — Copy of original Preliminary model from NCFMP for the 10, 25, 50, 100, FW and
500-Year Storms (Hec-Ras v4.1.0).
CORRECTED — Copy of Duplicate model for the 10, 25, 50, 100, FW and 500-Year Storms with
corrections and additional cross -sections (Hec-Ras v4.1.0).
REVISED — Copy of Corrected model for the 10, 25, 50, 100 and 500-Year Storms with the
proposed Wake Stone bridge (Hec-Ras v4.1.0).

VICINITY MAP
W
W
V
W
W
ce
J
r
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
` PROFILE (VERTICAL)
PROJECT SITE,,
CRABTREE CREEK
WAKE STONE CORPORATION
ACCESS ROAD
LOCATION: WAKE COUNTY
INTERSTATE
40
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared In the Office of: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Pkwy
Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518 P.E.
INTERNATIONAL NCLicense: F-1084 SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
TODD H. BUCKNER, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:

� k
//
A
A.
10U
DD U
-
IZ�%M(ME
- -
rt,
)
A
i
-
Ic
`x
11
-
7:
V
3`Il°5 DDT...
3
`
va�
FF
Canjtcrating Tcclinical Stoti
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION
DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FR IS. N C.GOV/FRIS
Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
-Without
Zone A,V, A99
With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
® Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
-0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard Areas
of 1%Annual Chance Flood with Average
Depth Less Than One Foot or W ith Drainage
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
— Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone
OTHER AREAS OF
— Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2%Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, orFloodwall
STRUCTURES
I I I I I I I I I I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
BM5510D INOrth(2l G13odetlCSurveybenchmark
BM55102 Njtiolal Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510® DytractorEst. NCFMPSureybendlmark
01 8c2— Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
d - - - - - Coastal Transact
------- Coastal Transact Baseline
— - — Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information antl uestians about this ma available rodu associaNtl wit, — FIRM Including
M1lstode versions of INs FIRM, how to order products or Me National Flood Insurance Program In general,
pleasecall the FEMAMap Info..—.X .nge at 1-877-FEMA-MAP(1-87]-336-262])or visit tine FEMA Map
Service Canter websita at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying IF —Insurance Sbldy report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMAI ra,aing potions of this panel, antl digital version. of this
FIRM may be available. Visit tine North Carolina all Mapping Program —it, at hill .n rbodmaps.rx
or contact line FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land an adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of Me adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be.dared diredly from line Map Service te Cenr at the number Iiat.d .have.
For community and countywide map dates refer to tine FI. d Insurance Stl report far this judadiction.
To ddermine if flood insurance is available in Me community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Fload Insurance Pmgrem at 1-800638-a—
B.ae map information ahawn on Mia FIRM was provided in digital (mural by the North C.rellna E—plain
Mapping Pmg,am (NCFMP). The source of this information cen be determined from the metadata avaiable In the
bell FLOOD database and In the TecM1nical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appear. on this panel th.,k with your local
unity to obtain more information, ouch as the estimated level of protection I,— (which may.-..d the
1-percent-annual ....levee and Emergency At— Plan, on the levee sydem(s).h— as providing protection,
To mitigate flood rink in residual dsk areas, properly owners and residents are encouraged to mnsider in.
and rootlprooeng or oth r protective measures, For more information on flood insurance, interested
pa Iles IhnnId visit tine FEMA Webaite at http://www.fema.govNusinesalnhplindex..htm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisi—ty—I litad Levee (PAL) torte
appears on this panel, check wi , your Ill —unity to blain more'mrormation, such as the estimated level or
protection provided (which may exceed the 1-peroenaannua1-chance levee and Emergency Adion Plan, on the
I.. sydem(s)sh.n as providing protection. To maintain —dilation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 6510 of the NFIP regulations.
If th. community or owner doe. not Provide the necessary data and documentation or if the dat..nd documantaton
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Secion 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk In
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are enceuraged t, consider flood Insurance and floedproofng
or other protective measures, For more intormation on flood insurance. interested padies should visit the FEMA
Website at M1tlp:llwww.Tema.govlbusiness/nflplindex.sM1Vn.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
celegory has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Adion (LIMA). The UMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5-foot breaking wave. The effects or wave hazards between the VE Zone and the UMWA
(or between the shoreline and the UMWAfor areas wllere VE Zones are not Iol letl) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
TM1is mapmay include.pproximatebountlariesof line CBRS forinformational Wrpo oonly.Flootlinsuranceisnot
it di .me within CBRS areas for structures fllat ere newly built or subslentlaly Improved on or after Me dele(s)
iFIEBaled on line map. Far more inf.rmeli.n see hllp://www.fws.govlM1abitetc.nserv-800-3 WI berder.Mml, the
FIE Report, or cell the U.S. FisM1 and WiMlrfa Sernca Customer Service Center al 1-floc-3aA-WILD.
® CBRS Area 0 Otherwise Protected Area
Pmia:
emap
North Carolina State It...
Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 Horizontal NAVD 1988 Vertical
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
0 250 500
1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150
300
PANEL LOCATOR
hA-
RUMME
11W
YF: �I �
aMle.M
®IIiY � � Iliil i�
MI=-:
MMMMMEMI:110
UEMSEMEMEMEMEMEOR
t11�,tI�J�I�tI�J11��I�t1I��tI�J�1�'��k�I�l�kJ�
Ylil Yii1111i1®®Iliil
WM'ii�(OM'iMi-IMi'I®®®SI®M
MUM
I♦��Mii®'IEii'AaraI�fZiEi>iMi"iEi"iM'IEEiC
�r�1)p�I''-W
II'Mi'�i`-i�L��i-II��r��'I�`il�
r r'
IU'MiI'Mii'iMr''E'
�i�fiflfiMllftlPY'i1111fIYY"IM
I�li��lRM�MRE}�RE1l�IM�I,�}MCIM.t�ltM�lM�Mllll��IlM!!M�mlM�lM�ltM��;1E
WilYlilMYr�inl�MYfilMY�lilY�Y�y'I�fNfiiil
YIMEMPE191
��'�i1'�:"Mil'MI�M('iM�`iZ'iMi''M
FIW
'®I,���II'EE�MMM'
'®'�}®I,�}.'1�11mI,���I.�®J'11�®�11®I®�11rLlMr�r�IYF.'M
WnEYiilYV.
En
M
UM1'ILiiMMMEMNNIYfYM
MMMMEMMEME
m
SMfil'I'i�i7M1WM7'1�-7E0Mi7'IMii'IMil'
�
a
dZZ.a
�WANIMMI_nq-
ENORTH
CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
cc
'-ODD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
r�
_
1
PANEL 0766
f�
C
0
I�W
cc
cc
Panel Contains:
'
-
Cn
O IMMU ITY OD PANEL SUFFIX
CARY TOWN OF 370238 066 K
RALEIGH, CITY OF 3]0243 0766 K
WAKE COUNTY 370368 0766 K
0
_0
U_
O
PRELIMINARY
_W
03131/2015
cc
Z
MAPNUMBER
3720076600K

78°46'30"W 78°46'0"W
20700

o, / I �� - I ) \ PROIEGT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
_ I
�������� 11 I _ //� / �� �� A \A \ �\ \\ RW SHEET NO.
I I \ \ ` �\\ \ �� i "+_ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
I N �•_--,- 1 I P��\\ \ \ \ / i -�� ENGINEER ENGINEER
\•....: _ : _:: ' � Il; �\\� \\ , -- ; , _
INCOMP]L1E rE PLANS
\ \ 1 I ; 1 \ l I , / \ \ 1 \ ��// / �VA• DO NOT US B FOR /W ACQUISMM
II I \\ \ '\ �� �� � ''I� }) � � � II, i���11I) I (/ \ \\ I \ I II\I /�\ �•Y
-
—50DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
— /'
\ \ g� / / UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
'U ti
106629 50' 25' 0 50' 100'
H j' O,
`
l€ 100'
c�
<<<< , I� ;
\� / WAKE STON E
�COR ECTED \\ I N I CIE O AY \\\ \\�\�- ' \
10 AR FLOO PLAIN I \� vv v
I I '�` �\
--- i- C RR �D v� �; I _-- ?v v \ \N o ��
\�
Y�R FL O
v �v 06 7
�v v O EBAI�IK� i I I A ��
-------
��� 22' 33 5
688 3- I
I � -
/
106911m ,
A� BM°� _ \
------------
- — — -- — — — — — — _ b
��vL �♦ _ �_ �� — ��� ��'�� �_
is
BM 1 - 08��:0 C�Q�76�61 ��_ -�� v �o�� S.
\ BM#2 / 170 51 3- �-067385.3& -_-E-L V- MF4-6
BM#3 �I�� 77_Z$� �L�X=�7��1L5� � _ --- �oo �A \ •v _ _ _ .-� - _ -�-��� �� � �
\ - ��� ___-- __--- - - ,---
--- _--- --��
- -_.PRELIMINARY FLOODk(AY-----�
\ IN 100yr. \ ODGE - _ - \ FRIa
\ ELIMXRY� D
\
---
--CORRECTED/REVISED -FLOOa1NA1L
r� -- CORRECTED/REVISED 100yr. FLOOCZ FRING�\
-�-•-•-•- C-ORRECTEDIREVISED 500yr. FLOOD FRINGE��n

HEC-RAS River Crabtree Creek Reach Main Profiles 100-vr
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Plan
O Total
Min Ch El
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Val Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fUft)
(fUs)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Main
106629
100-yr
REV
1995.00
249.20
260.18
254.08
260.40
0.000911
3.78
563.90
81.93
0.22
Main
106629
100-yr
COR
1995.00
249.20
260.18
254.08
260.40
0.000911
3.78
563.90
81.93
0.22
Main
106629
100-yr
DUP
1995.00
252.00
260.18
256.39
260.54
0.002044
4.87
445.19
81.93
0.32
Main
106793
100-yr
REV
2793.00
249.40
260.31
260.62
0.001475
4.51
619.63
72.64
0.27
Main
106793
100-yr
COR
2793.00
249.40
260.31
260.62
0.001475
4.51
619.63
72.64
0.27
Main
106805.8
100-yr
COR
2793.00
249.40
260.33
260.64
0.001463
4.50
621.09
72.75
0.27
Main
106837.9
Bridge
Main
106869.8
100-yr
COR
2793.00
249.90
260.33
260.81
0.002344
5.54
506.59
66.29
0.34
Main
106883
100-yr
REV
2793.00
249.90
260.36
255.68
260.84
0.002312
5.52
508.84
66.48
0.34
Main
106883
100-yr
COR
2793.00
249.90
260.36
260.84
0.002312
5.52
508.84
66.48
0.34
Main
106911
100-yr
REV
2793.00
250.60
260.38
260.94
0.002921
5.99
466.50
57.61
0.37
Main
106911
100-yr
COR
2793.00
250.60
260.38
260.94
0.002922
5.99
466.50
57.61
0.37
Main
106911
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.07
260.62
262.16
0.010529
10.08
303.13
65.98
0.71
Main
107168
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.12
261.69
261.69
264.27
0.020398
12.99
229.76
51.60
0.95
Main
107168
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.12
261.69
261.69
264.27
0.020398
12.99
229.76
51.60
0.95
Main
107168
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.12
263.17
261.69
264.64
0.008889
9.98
349.56
120.44
0.65
Main
107382
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.17
264.88
265.19
0.001270
4.58
747.08
133.69
0.26
Main
107382
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.17
264.88
265.19
0.001270
4.58
747.08
133.69
0.26
Main
107382
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.17
265.01
265.31
0.001205
4.50
764.70
135.92
0.26
Main
107550
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.21
265.10
265.40
0.001257
4.60
767.48
129.98
0.26
Main
107550
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.21
265.10
265.40
0.001257
4.60
767.48
129.98
0.26
Main
107550
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.21
265.22
265.51
0.001202
4.54
783.00
132.80
0.26
Main
107774
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.26
265.39
265.67
0.001120
4.55
818.40
121.89
0.25
Main
107774
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.26
265.39
265.67
0.001120
4.55
818.40
121.89
0.25
Main
107774
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.26
265.50
265.77
0.001076
4.49
831.35
122.86
0.25
Main
108007
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.32
265.61
266.05
0.001963
5.80
689.12
119.26
0.33
Main
108007
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.32
265.61
266.05
0.001963
5.80
689.12
119.26
0.33
Main
108007
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.32
265.71
266.13
0.001885
5.72
700.67
119.92
0.32
Main
108281
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.38
266.13
266.62
0.002183
6.04
640.43
118.57
0.34
Main
108281
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.38
266.13
266.62
0.002183
6.04
640.43
118.57
0.34
Main
108281
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.38
266.20
266.69
0.002113
5.98
649.44
118.90
0.33
Main
108511
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.43
266.72
261.23
266.98
0.001115
4.60
1033.24
242.44
0.25
Main
108511
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.43
266.72
261.23
266.98
0.001115
4.60
1033.24
242.44
0.25
Main
108511
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.43
266.78
261.23
267.03
0.001083
4.55
1047.64
242.86
0.25
Main
108847
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.51
267.06
259.23
267.26
0.000633
3.91
1129.61
224.58
0.19
Main
108847
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.51
267.06
259.23
267.26
0.000633
3.91
1129.61
224.58
0.19
Main
108847
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.51
267.11
259.23
267.30
0.000621
3.88
1140.68
225.12
0.19
Main
109268
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.61
267.36
260.32
267.52
0.000585
3.67
1356.02
272.65
0.19
Main
109268
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.61
267.36
260.32
267.52
0.000585
3.67
1356.02
272.65
0.19
Main
109268
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.61
267.40
260.32
267.56
0.000574
3.64
1367.95
273.26
0.19
Main
109742
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.72
267.62
258.93
267.74
0.000387
3.08
1382.68
249.61
0.15
Main
109742
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.72
267.62
258.93
267.74
0.000387
3.08
1382.68
249.61
0.15
Main
109742
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.72
267.66
258.93
267.78
0.000381
3.06
1392.38
250.22
0.15
Main
110032
100-yr
REV
2793.00
252.78
267.69
261.12
267.94
0.000925
4.52
1198.54
406.06
0.23
Main
110032
100-yr
COR
2793.00
252.78
267.69
261.12
267.94
0.000925
4.52
1198.54
406.06
0.23
Main
110032
100-yr
DUP
2793.00
252.78
267.73
261.12
267.98
0.000906
4.49
1214.25
407.88
0.23
Main
110353
100-yr
REV
1719.00
252.86
268.06
260.42
268.17
0.000425
2.98
1018.75
284.62
0.15
Main
110353
100-yr
COR
1719.00
252.86
268.06
260.42
268.17
0.000425
2.98
1018.75
284.62
0.15
Main
110353
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
252.86
268.09
260.42
268.20
0.000418
2.96
1027.50
285.21
0.15
Main
110805
100-yr
REV
1719.00
252.96
268.24
258.44
268.31
0.000198
2.14
1045.90
179.96
0.11
Main
110805
100-yr
COR
1719.00
252.96
268.24
258.44
268.31
0.000198
2.14
1045.90
179.96
0.11
Main
110805
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
252.96
268.27
258.44
268.33
0.000196
2.13
1050.92
180.20
0.11
Main
110917
Bridge
Main
111085
100-yr
REV
1719.00
253.93
269.21
259.20
269.27
0.000194
2.16
1076.02
172.13
0.11
Main
111085
100-yr
COR
1 1719.001
253.93
269.21
259.20
269.27
0.000194
2.16
1076.02
172.13
0.11
Main
111085
100-yr
DUP
1 1719.001
253.93
269.23
259.20
269.30
0.000192
2.15
1080.60
172.55
0.11
Main
111345
100-yr
REV
1719.00
253.80
269.28
258.71
269.31
0.000109
1.66
1304.12
248.51
0.08
Main
117345
100-yr
COR
1719.00
253.80
269.28
258.71
269.31
0.000109
1.66
1304.12
248.51
0.08
Main
1111345
1100-yr
IDUP
1719.00
253.80
269.30
258.71
269.34
0.000108
1.66
1308.08
248.70
0.08

HEC-RAS River Crabtree Creek Reach Main Profiles 100-vr (Continued)
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Plan
O Total
Min Ch El
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Val Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(Post)
(fUs)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Main
111553
100-yr
REV
1719.00
253.41
269.30
258.32
269.34
0.000085
1.49
1361.20
143.55
0.07
Main
111553
100-yr
COR
1719.00
253.41
269.30
258.32
269.34
0.000085
1.49
1361.20
143.55
0.07
Main
111553
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
253.41
269.33
258.32
269.36
0.000084
1.48
1364.89
143.69
0.07
Main
111579
Bridge
Main
111598
100-yr
REV
1719.00
252.52
269.55
257.60
269.59
0.000091
1.62
1323.25
149.72
0.08
Main
111598
100-yr
COR
1719.00
252.52
269.55
257.60
269.59
0.000091
1.62
1323.25
149.72
0.08
Main
111598
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
252.52
269.58
257.60
269.61
0.000090
1.61
1327.21
149.87
0.07
Main
111712
100-yr
REV
1719.00
254.93
269.55
259.79
269.61
0.000177
2.08
1098.64
152.94
0.10
Main
111712
100-yr
COR
1719.00
254.93
269.55
259.79
269.61
0.000177
2.08
1098.64
152.94
0.10
Main
111712
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
254.93
269.58
259.79
269.64
0.000175
2.07
1102.67
153.09
0.10
Main
111720
Bridge
Main
111722
100-yr
REV
1719.00
255.31
269.76
260.04
269.80
0.000127
1.73
1195.42
158.62
0.09
Main
111722
100-yr
COR
1719.00
255.31
269.76
260.04
269.80
0.000127
1.73
1195.42
158.62
0.09
Main
111722
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
255.31
269.79
260.04
269.82
0.000126
1.72
1198.99
158.75
0.09
Main
111833
100-yr
REV
1719.00
255.12
269.76
269.83
0.000195
2.25
973.70
113.49
0.11
Main
111833
100-yr
COR
1719.00
255.12
269.76
269.83
0.000195
2.25
973.70
113.49
0.11
Main
111833
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
255.12
269.79
269.85
0.000194
2.24
976.71
113.60
0.11
Main
111967
100-yr
REV
1719.00
254.92
269.78
269.86
0.000249
2.48
824.53
104.28
0.12
Main
111967
100-yr
COR
1719.00
254.92
269.78
269.86
0.000249
2.48
824.53
104.28
0.12
Main
111967
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
254.92
269.80
269.89
0.000246
2.47
827.29
104.40
0.12
Main
112127
100-yr
REV
1719.00
254.72
269.82
269.90
0.000232
2.37
876.61
115.61
0.12
Main
112127
100-yr
COR
1719.00
254.72
269.82
269.90
0.000232
2.37
876.61
115.61
0.12
Main
112127
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
254.72
269.85
269.93
0.000230
2.36
879.61
115.77
0.12
Main
112318
100-yr
REV
1719.00
257.64
269.87
269.96
0.000399
2.81
869.90
152.04
0.15
Main
112318
100-yr
COR
1719.00
257.64
269.87
269.96
0.000399
2.81
869.90
152.04
0.15
Main
112318
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
257.64
269.90
269.98
0.000394
2.80
873.81
152.15
0.15
Main
112464
100-yr
REV
1719.00
269.58
271.42
271.42
272.25
0.019608
7.33
238.54
149.15
1.00
Main
112464
100-yr
COR
1719.00
269.58
271.42
271.42
272.25
0.019608
7.33
238.54
149.15
1.00
Main
112464
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
269.58
271.42
271.42
272.25
0.019608
7.33
238.54
149.15
1.00
Main
112533
100-yr
REV
1719.00
272.36
274.47
274.47
275.30
0.019908
7.32
236.24
146.52
1.00
Main
112533
100-yr
COR
1719.00
272.36
274.47
274.47
275.30
0.019908
7.32
236.24
146.52
1.00
Main
112533
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
272.36
274.47
274.47
275.30
0.019908
7.32
236.24
146.52
1.00
Main
112614
100-yr
REV
1719.00
274.75
276.85
276.85
277.74
0.018921
7.60
230.97
135.31
0.99
Main
112614
100-yr
COR
1719.00
274.75
276.85
276.85
277.74
0.018921
7.60
230.97
135.31
0.99
Main
112614
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
274.75
276.85
276.85
277.74
0.018921
7.60
230.97
135.31
0.99
Main
112709
100-yr
REV
1719.00
277.27
279.40
279.40
280.24
0.019784
7.37
236.65
145.64
1.00
Main
112709
100-yr
COR
1719.00
277.27
279.40
279.40
280.24
0.019784
7.37
236.65
145.64
1.00
Main
112709
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
277.27
279.40
279.40
280.24
0.019784
7.37
236.65
145.64
1.00
Main
112798
100-yr
REV
1719.00
279.98
282.23
282.23
283.08
0.019888
7.41
234.65
143.08
1.01
Main
112798
100-yr
COR
1719.00
279.98
282.23
282.23
283.08
0.019888
7.41
234.65
143.08
1.01
Main
112798
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
279.98
282.23
282.23
283.08
0.019888
7.41
234.65
143.08
1.01
Main
112885
100-yr
REV
1719.00
282.77
284.81
284.81
285.65
0.019962
7.42
237.19
145.65
1.01
Main
112885
100-yr
COR
1719.00
282.77
284.81
284.81
285.65
0.019962
7.42
237.19
145.65
1.01
Main
112885
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
282.77
284.81
284.81
285.65
0.019962
7.42
237.19
145.65
1.01
Main
112942
100-yr
REV
1719.00
284.16
286.12
286.12
286.98
0.019392
7.54
237.56
143.02
1.00
Main
112942
100-yr
COR
1719.00
284.16
286.12
286.12
286.98
0.019392
7.54
237.56
143.02
1.00
Main
112942
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
284.16
286.12
286.12
286.98
0.019392
7.54
237.56
143.02
1.00
Main
113006
100-yr
REV
1719.00
284.02
287.16
287.38
0.002341
3.82
475.57
159.74
0.38
Main
113006
100-yr
COR
1719.00
284.02
287.16
287.38
0.002341
3.82
475.57
159.74
0.38
Main
113006
100-yr
DUP
1719.00
284.02
287.16
287.38
0.002341
3.82
475.57
159.74
0.38

ReaCh
River She
Profile
Plan
W.S. Elev
Prof Delta W S
E.G. Elev
Top W Oth Act
Q Left
Q Channel
Q Right
Eno Ste L
Ch Ste L
Ch Ste R
Eno Ste R
(ft)
(It)
(ft)
(ft)
We )
(Cfs)
Ws)
(It)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
Main
106629
100-yr
REV
260.18
260.40
81.93
14.51
1964.22
16.27
641.60
697.00
Main
106629
100-yr
CDR
260.18
260.40
81.93
14.51
1964.22
16.27
641.60
697.00
Main
106629
100-yr
DUP
260.18
260.54
81.93
21.72
1948.91
24.36
641.60
697.00
Main
106629
FW
REV
260.64
0.46
260.85
55.40
1995.00
641.60
641.60
697.00
697.00
Main
106629
FW
CDR
260.64
0.46
260.85
55.40
1995.00
641.60
641.60
697.00
697.00
Main
106629
FW
DUP
260.64
0.46
260.98
55.40
1995.00
641.60
641.60
697.00
697.00
Main
106793
100-yr
REV
260.31
260.62
72.64
0.02
2792.96
0.02
177.00
248.00
Main
106793
100-yr
CDR
260.31
260.62
72.64
0.02
2792.96
0.02
177.00
248.00
Main
106793
FW
REV
260.77
0.46
261.06
71.00
2793.00
177.00
177.00
248.00
248.00
Main
106793
FW
CDR
260.77
0.46
261.06
71.00
2793.00
177.00
177.00
248.00
248.00
Main
106805.8
100-yr
CDR
260.33
260.64
72.75
0.03
2792.95
0.03
177.00
248.00
Main
106805.8
FW
CDR
260.79
0.46
261.07
71.00
2793.00
177.00
177.00
248.00
248.00
Main
106837.9BR D
100-yr
REV
260.33
260.64
72.75
0.03
2792.95
0.03
177.00
248.00
Main
106837.9BR D
FW
REV
260.79
0.46
261.07
71.00
2793.00
177.00
177.00
248.00
248.00
Main
106837.9BR U
100-yr
REV
260.33
260.81
66.29
1.54
2791.36
0.10
183.00
244.00
Main
106837.9BR U
FW
REV
260.79
0.46
261.21
61.00
2793.00
183.00
183.00
244.00
244.00
Main
106869.8
100-yr
CDR
260.33
260.81
66.29
1.54
2791.36
0.10
183.00
244.00
Main
106869.8
FW
CDR
260.79
0.46
261.22
61.00
2793.00
183.00
183.00
244.00
244.00
Main
106883
100-yr
REV
260.84
66.48
1.64
2791.25
0.12
183.00
244.00
Main
106883
100-yr
CDR
260.84
66.48
1.64
2791.25
0.12
183.00
244.00
Main
106883
FW
REV
0.45
261.24
61.00
2793.00
183.00
183.00
244.00
244.00
Main
106883
FW
CDR
0.46
261.25
61.00
2793.00
183.00
183.00
244.00
244.00
1210...'0
Main
106911
100-yr
REV
260.94
57.61
2792.79
0.21
310.00
367.00
Main
106911
100-yr
CDR
260.94
57.61
2792.88
0.12
310.00
367.00
Main
106911
100-yr
DUP
262.16
65.98
50.84
2722.62
19.53
323.24
366.24
Main
106911
FW
REV
0.42
261.34
52.00
2793.00
315.00
310.00
367.00
367.00
Main
106911
FW
CDR
260.80
0.43
261.35
52.00
2793.00
315.00
310.00
367.00
367.00
Main
106911
FW
DUP
261.13
0.50
262.45
55.00
52.17
2721.80
19.03
315.00
323.24
366.24
370.00
Main
107168
100-yr
REV
261.69
264.27
51.60
27.16
2744.85
20.98
323.02
359.71
Main
107168
100-yr
CDR
261.69
264.27
51.60
27.16
2744.85
20.98
323.02
359.71
Main
107168
100-yr
DUP
263.17
264.64
119.23
62.67
2651.37
78.96
323.02
359.71
Main
107168
FW
REV
261.70
0.00
264.27
50.00
27.68
2743.74
21.57
315.00
323.02
359.71
365.00
Main
107168
FW
CDR
261.70
0.00
264.27
50.00
27.68
2743.74
21.57
315.00
323.02
359.71
365.00
Main
107168
FW
DUP
263.18
0.01
264.72
50.00
59.87
2693.20
39.93
315.00
323.02
359.71
365.00
Main
107382
100-yr
REV
264.88
265.19
133.69
24.16
2605.92
162.93
192.61
253.43
Main
107382
100-yr
CDR
264.88
265.19
133.69
24.16
2605.92
162.931
192.61
253.43
Main
107382
100-yr
DUP
265.01
265.31
135.92
25.51
2597.89
169.61
192.61
253.43
Main
107382
FW
REV
264.89
0.00
265.23
73.00
23.98
2722.42
46.60
187.00
192.61
253.43
260.00
Main
107382
FW
CDR
264.89
0.00
265.23
73.00
23.98
2722.42
46.60
187.00
192.61
253.43
260.00
Main
107382
FW
DUP
265.09
0.08
265.42
73.00
24.83
2720.95
47.22
187.00
192.61
253.43
260.00
Main
107550
100-yr
REV
265.10
265.40
129.98
61.63
2517.75
213.62
222.05
280.19
Main
107550
100-yr
CDR
265.10
265.40
129.98
61.63
2517.75
213.62
222.05
280.19
Main
107550
100-yr
DUP
265.22
265.51
132.80
64.07
2513.74
215.19
222.05
280.19
Main
107550
FW
REV
265.12
0.02
265.47
75.00
45.51
2657.51
89.99
215.00
222.05
280.19
290.00
Main
107550
FW
CDR
265.12
0.02
265.47
75.00
45.51
2657.51
89.99
215.00
222.05
280.19
290.00
Main
107550
FW
DUP
265.31
0.09
265.64
75.00
46.33
2655.87
90.80
215.00
222.05
280.19
290.00
Main
107774
100-yr
REV
265.39
265.67
121.89
260.21
2369.85
162.94
321.85
373.86
Main
107774
100-yr
CDR
265.39
265.67
121.89
260.21
2369.85
162.94
321.85
373.86
Main
107774
100-yr
DUP
265.50
265.77
122.86
263.69
2364.58
164.74
321.85
373.86
Main
107774
FW
REV
265.44
0.05
265.76
80.00
187.66
2491.02
114.32
305.00
321.85
373.86
385.00
Main
107774
FW
CDR
265.44
0.05
265.76
80.00
187.66
2491.02
114.32
305.00
321.85
373.86
385.00
Main
107774
FW
DUP
265.61
0.12
265.92
80.00
189.21
2488.74
115.06
305.00
321.85
373.86
385.00
Main
108007
100-yr
REV
265.61
266.05
119.26
420.81
2279.30
92.89
350.83
391.10
Main
108007
100-yr
CDR
265.61
266.05
119.26
420.81
2279.30
92.89
350.83
391.10
Main
108007
100-yr
DUP
265.71
266.13
119.92
428.26
2270.66
94.08
350.83
391.10
Main
108007
FW
REV
265.67
0.06
266.19
70.00
288.40
2417.52
87.08
330.00
350.83
391.10
400.00
Main
108007
FW
CDR
265.67
0.06
266.19
70.00
288.40
2417.52
87.08
330.00
350.83
391.10
400.00
Main
108007
FW
DUP
265.83
0.12
266.32
70.00
291.12
2413.77
88.11
330.00
350.83
391.10
400.00
Main
108281
100-yr
REV
266.13
266.62
118.57
382.76
2402.61
7.63
398.01
437.98
Main
108281
100-yr
CDR
266.13
266.62
118.57
382.76
2402.61
7.63
398.01
437.98
Main
108281
100-yr
DUP
266.20
266.69
118.90
391.12
2394.12
7.76
398.01
437.98
Main
108281
FW
REV
266.21
0.08
266.89
50.00
87.92
2697.39
7.69
390.00
398.01
437.98
440.00
Main
108281
FW
CDR
266.21
0.08
266.89
50.00
87.92
2697.39
7.69
390.00
398.01
437.98
440.00
Main
108281
FW
DUP
266.33
0.12
266.99
50.00
88.71
2696.46
7.83
390.00
398.01
437.98
440.00
Main
108511
100-yr
REV
266.72
266.98
242.44
539.67
2178.71
74.62
484.15
529.31
Main
108511
100-yr
CDR
266.72
266.98
242.44
539.67
2178.71
74.62
484.15
529.31
Main
108511
100-yr
DUP
266.78
267.03
242.86
550.56
2167.44
75.01
484.15
529.31
Main
108511
FW
REV
266.93
0.21
267.37
60.00
107.28
2632.43
53.29
475.00
484.15
529.31
535.00
Main
108511
FW
CDR
266.93
0.21
267.37
60.00
107.28
2632.43
53.29
475.00
484.15
529.31
535.00
Main
108511
FW
DUP
267.03
0.25
267.45
60.00
107.64
2631.88
53.48
475.00
484.15
529.31
535.00
Main
108847
100-yr
REV
267.06
267.26
224.58
258.96
2341.86
192.17
319.67
367.19
Main
108847
100-yr
CDR
267.08
267.26
224.58
258.96
2341.86
192.17
319.67
367.19
Main
108847
100-yr
DUP
1 267.111
267.30
225.12
262.77
2334.77
195.46
319.67
367.19
Main
108847
FW
REV
267.45
0.39
267.73
60.00
100.34
2676.92
15.73
310.00
319.67
367.19
370.00
Main
108847
FW
CDR
267.45
0.39
267.73
60.00
100.34
2676.921
15.731
310.00
319.67
3117.19
370.00
Main
108847
FW
DUP
267.53
0.42
267.81
60.00
100.61
2676.63
15.77
310.00
319.67
367.19
370.00
Main
109268
100-yr
REV
267.38
267.52
272.65
677.60
2064.78
50.641
405.81
452.88

ReaCh
River She
Profile
Plan
W.S. Elev
Prof Delta W S
E.G. Elev
Top W Oth Act
Q Left
Q Channel
Q Right
Eno Ste L
Ch Ste L
Ch Ste R
Eno Ste R
(ft)
(It)
(ft)
(ft)
We )
(Cfs)
Ws)
(It)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
Main
109268
100-yr
COR
267.36
267.52
272.65
677.60
2064.76
50.64
405.81
452.88
Main
109268
100-yr
DUP
267.40
267.56
273.26
684.33
2057.76
50.91
405.81
452.88
Main
109268
FW
REV
267.76
0.40
268.09
55.00
60.78
2719.15
13.08
400.00
405.81
452.88
455.00
Main
109268
FW
CDR
267.76
0.40
268.09
55.00
60.78
2719.15
13.08
400.00
405.81
452.88
455.00
Main
109268
FW
DUP
267.83
0.43
268.16
55.00
60.80
2719.13
13.07
400.00
405.81
452.88
455.00
Main
109742
100-yr
REV
267.62
267.74
249.61
88.68
2351.56
352.77
262.74
323.08
Main
109742
100-yr
CDR
267.62
267.74
249.61
88.68
2351.56
352.77
262.74
323.08
Main
109742
100-yr
DUP
267.66
267.78
250.22
89.67
2346.82
356.51
262.74
323.08
Main
109742
FW
REV
268.22
0.60
268.40
65.00
12.85
2773.01
7.15
260.00
262.74
323.08
325.00
Main
109742
FW
CDR
268.22
0.60
268.40
65.00
12.85
2773.01
7.15
260.00
262.74
323.08
325.00
Main
109742
FW
DUP
268.28
0.63
268.47
65.00
12.86
2772.99
7.16
260.00
262.74
323.08
325.00
Main
110032
100-yr
REV
267.69
267.94
406.06
69.41
2176.78
546.80
271.26
311.70
Main
110032
100-yr
COR
267.69
267.94
406.06
69.41
2176.78
546.80
271.26
311.70
Main
110032
100-yr
DUP
267.73
267.98
407.88
69.46
2166.16
557.38
271.26
311.70
Main
110032
FW
REV
268.22
0.53
268.70
43.00
6.64
2779.46
6.90
270.00
271.26
311.70
313.00
Main
110032
FW
CDR
268.22
0.53
268.70
43.00
6.64
2779.46
6.90
270.00
271.26
311.70
313.00
Main
110032
FW
DUP
268.29
0.56
268.76
43.00
6.64
2779.46
6.90
270.00
271.26
311.70
313.00
Main
110353
100-yr
REV
268.06
268.17
283.74
119.71
1371.50
227.79
275.99
316.04
Main
110353
100-yr
COR
268.06
268.17
283.74
119.71
1371.50
227.79
275.99
316.04
Main
110353
100-yr
DUP
268.09
268.20
283.83
119.91
1367.16
231.93
275.99
316.04
Main
110353
FW
REV
268.82
0.76
269.01
40.70
0.20
1717.90
0.89
275.80
275.99
316.04
316.50
Main
110353
FW
CDR
268.82
0.76
269.01
40.70
0.20
1717.90
0.89
275.80
275.99
316.04
316.50
Main
110353
FW
DUP
268.88
0.79
269.07
40.70
0.20
1717.90
0.89
275.80
275.991
316.04
316.50
Main
110805
100-yr
REV
268.24
268.31
179.96
81.60
1569.07
68.33
432.19
492.06
Main
110805
100-yr
CDR
268.24
268.31
179.96
81.60
1569.07
68.33
432.19
492.06
Main
110805
100-yr
DUP
268.27
268.33
180.20
81.82
1567.64
69.54
432.19
492.06
Main
110805
FW
REV
269.11
0.86
269.18
60.50
0.12
1718.42
0.46
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110805
FW
CDR
269.11
0.86
269.18
60.50
0.12
1718.42
0.46
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110805
FW
DUP
269.16
0.89
269.23
60.50
0.12
1718.42
0.46
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110917 BR D
100-yr
REV
268.26
268.33
132.09
98.75
1542.49
77.76
432.19
492.06
Main
110917 BR D
100-yr
CDR
268.26
268.33
132.09
98.75
1542.49
77.76
432.19
492.06
Main
110917 BR D
100-yr
DUP
268.29
268.35
132.18
99.08
1541.34
78.58
432.19
492.06
Main
110917 BR D
FW
REV
269.11
0.86
269.19
56.50
1.86
1713.94
3.21
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110917 BR D
FW
CDR
269.11
0.86
269.19
56.50
1.86
1713.94
3.21
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110917 BR D
FW
DUP
269.17
0.89
269.25
56.50
1.87
1713.91
3.23
432.00
432.19
492.06
492.50
Main
110917 BR U
100-yr
REV
269.18
269.25
136.27
108.60
1502.58
107.83
438.45
493.43
Main
110917 BR U
100-yr
CDR
269.18
269.25
136.27
108.60
1502.58
107.83
438.45
493.43
Main
110917 BR U
100-yr
DUP
269.21
269.28
136.35
109.10
1501.35
108.55
438.45
493.43
Main
110917 BR U
FW
REV
269.46
0.28
269.54
86.00
90.00
1554.62
74.38
420.00
438.45
493.43
510.00
Main
110917 BR U
FW
CDR
269.46
0.28
269.54
86.00
90.00
1554.62
74.38
420.00
438.45
493.43
510.00
Main
110917 BR U
FW
DUP
269.21
0.00
269.30
56.00
8.05
1700.19
10.76
435.00
438.45
493.43
495.00
Main
111085
100-yr
REV
269.21
269.27
172.13
121.69
1494.15
103.16
438.45
493.43
Main
111085
100-yr
CDR
269.21
269.27
172.13
121.69
1494.15
103.16
438.45
493.43
Main
111085
100-yr
DUP
269.23
269.30
172.55
122.23
1492.73
104.04
438.45
493.43
Main
111085
FW
REV
269.48
0.28
269.55
90.00
97.44
1564.98
56.59
420.00
438.45
493.43
510.00
Main
111085
FW
CDR
269.48
0.28
269.55
90.00
97.44
1564.98
56.59
420.00
438.45
493.43
510.00
Main
111085
FW
DUP
269.23
0.00
269.33
60.00
14.66
1700.90
3.43
435.00
438.45
493.43
495.00
Main
111345
100-yr
REV
269.28
269.31
152.49
93.42
1500.05
125.53
301.41
372.11
Main
111345
100-yr
CDR
269.28
269.31
152.49
93.42
1500.05
125.53
301.41
372.11
Main
111345
100-yr
DUP
269.30
269.34
152.57
93.87
1499.12
126.01
301.41
372.11
Main
111345
FW
REV
269.55
0.28
269.60
95.00
47.35
1626.11
45.55
290.00
301.41
372.11
385.00
Main
111345
FW
CDR
269.55
0.28
269.60
95.00
47.35
1626.11
45.55
290.00
301.41
372.11
385.00
Main
111345
FW
DUP
269.34
0.03
269.38
95.00
46.51
1627.64
44.85
290.00
301.41
372.11
385.00
Main
111553
100-yr
REV
269.30
269.34
143.55
45.12
1582.95
90.93
367.08
449.00
Main
111553
100-yr
CDR
269.30
269.34
143.55
45.12
1582.95
90.93
367.08
449.00
Main
111553
100-yr
DUP
269.33
269.36
143.69
45.31
1582.44
91.24
367.08
449.00
Main
111553
FW
REV
269.59
0.29
269.62
110.00
41.65
1621.15
56.20
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111553
FW
CDR
269.59
0.29
269.62
110.00
41.65
1621.15
56.20
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111553
FW
DUP
269.38
0.05
269.41
110.00
40.83
1622.70
55.47
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111579 BR D
100-yr
REV
269.31
269.34
137.55
65.46
1556.62
96.93
367.08
449.00
Main
111579 BR D
100-yr
CDR
269.31
269.34
137.55
65.46
1556.62
96.93
367.08
449.00
Main
111579 BR D
100-yr
DUP
269.33
269.36
137.69
65.76
1555.95
97.28
367.08
449.00
Main
111579 BR D
FW
REV
269.59
0.29
269.63
104.00
72.60
1591.96
54.44
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111579 BR D
FW
CDR
269.59
0.29
269.63
104.00
72.60
1591.96
54.44
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111579 BR D
FW
DUP
269.38
0.05
269.41
104.00
70.34
1594.89
53.77
355.00
367.08
449.00
465.00
Main
111579 BR U
100-yr
REV
269.54
269.58
142.68
158.32
1423.54
137.13
396.19
460.79
Main
111579 BR U
100-yr
CDR
269.54
269.58
142.68
158.32
1423.54
137.13
396.19
460.79
Main
111579 BR U
100-yr
DUP
269.57
269.60
142.83
159.01
1422.27
137.72
396.19
460.79
Main
111579 BR U
FW
REV
269.80
0.26
269.84
106.50
135.23
1438.71
145.05
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111579 BR U
FW
CDR
269.80
0.26
269.84
106.50
135.23
1438.71
145.05
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111579 BR U
FW
DUP
269.58
0.01
269.62
106.50
131.10
1447.49
140.41
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111598
100-yr
REV
269.55
269.59
149.72
130.67
1497.62
90.70
396.19
460.79
Main
111598
100-yr
CDR
269.55
269.59
149.72
130.67
1497.62
90.70
396.19
460.79
Main
111598
100-yr
DUP
269.58
269.61
149.87
131.25
1496.64
91.11
396.19
460.79
Main
111598
FW
REV
269.80
0.26
269.84
110.00
77.06
1549.10
92.84
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111598
FW
CDR
269.80
0.26
269.84
110.00
77.06
1549.10
92.84
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111598
FW
DUP
269.58
0.01
269.62
110.00
75.34
1553.22
90.44
380.00
396.19
460.79
490.00
Main
111712
100-yr
REV
269.55
269.61
152.50
288.34
1344.29
86.37
221.32
271.78
Main
111712
100-yr
COR
269.55
269.61
152.50
288.34
1344.29
86.37
221.32
271.78
Main
111712
100-yr
IDUP
269.581
269.641
152.59
289.76
1342.51
86.73
221.32
271.78

ReaCh
River She
Profile
Plan
W.S. Elev
Prof Delta W S
E.G. Elev
Top W Oth Act
Q Left
Q Channel
Q Right
Eno Ste L
Ch Ste L
Ch Ste R
Eno Ste R
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
We )
(Cfs)
Ws)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
Main
111712
FW
REV
269.81
0.25
269.87
115.00
233.40
1403.53
82.07
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111712
FW
CDR
269.81
0.25
269.87
115.00
233.40
1403.53
82.07
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111712
FW
DUP
269.59
0.01
269.65
115.00
226.32
1412.71
79.96
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111720 BR D
100-yr
REV
265.81
269.61
56.65
1636.62
25.73
221.32
271.78
Main
111720 BR D
100-yr
CDR
265.81
269.61
56.65
1636.62
25.73
221.32
271.78
Main
111720 BR D
100-yr
DUP
265.81
269.64
56.65
1636.62
25.73
221.32
271.78
Main
111720 BR D
FW
REV
265.81
0.00
269.87
53.03
1639.63
26.34
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111720 BR D
FW
CDR
265.81
0.00
269.87
53.03
1639.63
26.34
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111720 BR D
FW
DUP
265.81
0.00
269.65
53.03
1639.63
26.34
180.00
221.32
271.78
295.00
Main
111720 BR U
100-yr
REV
265.81
269.80
143.99
1556.36
18.65
211.16
275.88
Main
111720 BR U
100-yr
CDR
265.81
269.80
143.99
1556.36
18.65
211.16
275.88
Main
111720 BR U
100-yr
DUP
265.81
269.82
143.99
1556.36
18.65
211.16
275.88
Main
111720 BR U
FW
REV
265.81
0.00
270.06
137.99
1560.52
20.49
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111720 BR U
FW
CDR
265.81
0.00
270.06
137.99
1560.52
20.49
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111720 BR U
FW
DUP
265.81
0.00
269.84
137.991
1560.52
20.49
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111722
100-yr
REV
269.76
269.80
134.00
286.79
1360.27
71.94
211.16
275.88
Main
111722
100-yr
COR
269.76
269.80
134.00
286.79
1360.27
71.94
211.16
275.88
Main
111722
100-yr
DUP
269.79
269.82
134.00
287.57
1359.21
72.22
211.16
275.88
Main
111722
FW
REV
270.01
0.26
270.06
115.00
223.52
1436.02
59.46
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111722
FW
CDR
270.01
0.26
270.06
115.00
223.52
1436.02
59.46
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111722
FW
DUP
269.79
0.01
269.84
115.00
219.99
1440.99
58.02
180.00
211.16
275.88
295.00
Main
111833
100-yr
REV
269.76
269.83
113.49
270.47
1362.02
86.51
200.40
245.58
Main
111833
100-yr
CDR
269.76
269.83
113.49
270.47
1362.02
86.51
200.40
245.58
Main
111833
100-yr
DUP
269.79
269.85
113.60
271.37
1360.92
86.71
200.40
245.58
Main
111833
FW
REV
270.02
0.26
270.09
80.00
201.39
1436.53
81.08
180.00
200.40
245.58
260.00
Main
111833
FW
CDR
270.02
0.26
270.09
80.00
201.39
1436.53
81.08
180.00
200.40
245.58
260.00
Main
111833
FW
DUP
269.80
0.01
269.87
80.00
198.80
1440.06
80.13
180.00
200.40
245.58
260.00
Main
111967
100-yr
REV
269.78
269.86
104.28
155.88
1542.37
20.75
229.10
275.89
Main
111967
100-yr
CDR
269.78
269.88
104.28
155.88
1542.37
20.75
229.10
275.89
Main
111967
100-yr
DUP
269.80
269.89
104.40
157.01
1541.11
20.88
229.101
275.89
Main
111967
FW
REV
270.04
0.26
270.12
80.00
137.42
1560.47
21.11
204.00
229.10
275.89
284.00
Main
111967
FW
CDR
270.04
0.26
270.12
80.00
137.42
1560.47
21.11
204.00
229.10
275.89
284.00
Main
111967
FW
DUP
269.82
0.01
269.91
80.00
132.20
1566.44
20.36
204.00
229.10
275.89
284.00
Main
112127
100-yr
REV
269.82
269.90
115.61
198.82
1500.66
19.53
273.37
321.71
Main
112127
100-yr
CDR
269.82
269.90
115.61
198.82
1500.66
19.53
273.37
321.71
Main
112127
100-yr
DUP
269.85
269.93
115.77
200.03
1499.32
19.65
273.37
321.71
Main
112127
FW
REV
270.08
0.26
270.16
80.00
151.17
1547.57
20.27
250.00
273.37
321.71
330.00
Main
112127
FW
CDR
270.08
0.26
270.16
80.00
151.17
1547.57
20.27
250.00
273.37
321.71
330.00
Main
112127
FW
DUP
269.86
0.01
269.95
80.00
146.70
1552.80
19.50
250.00
273.37
321.71
330.00
Main
112318
100-yr
REV
269.87
269.96
152.04
583.52
1084.54
50.93
645.27
681.32
Main
112318
100-yr
CDR
269.87
269.96
152.04
583.52
1084.54
50.93
645.27
681.32
Main
112318
100-yr
DUP
269.90
269.98
152.15
585.70
1082.28
51.03
645.27
681.32
Main
112318
FW
REV
270.11
0.24
270.23
87.00
422.49
1239.19
57.32
605.00
645.27
681.32
692.00
Main
112318
FW
CDR
270.11
0.24
270.23
87.00
422.49
1239.19
57.32
605.00
645.27
681.32
692.00
Main
112318
FW
DUP
269.89
0.00
270.02
87.00
414.48
1247.98
56.54
605.00
645.27
681.32
692.00
Main
112464
100-yr
REV
271.42
272.25
149.15
12.19
1705.14
1.67
334.35
473.54
Main
112464
100-yr
CDR
271.42
272.25
149.15
12.19
1705.14
1.67
334.35
473.54
Main
112464
100-yr
DUP
271.42
272.25
149.15
12.19
1705.14
1.67
334.35
473.54
Main
112464
FW
REV
271 A2
0.00
272.25
147.00
12.88
1704.49
1.63
328.00
334.35
473.54
475.00
Main
112464
FW
CDR
271.42
0.00
272.25
147.00
12.88
1704.49
1.63
328.00
334.35
473.54
475.00
Main
112464
FW
DUP
271.42
0.00
272.25
147.00
12.88
1704.49
1.63
328.00
334.35
473.54
475.00
Main
112533
100-yr
REV
274.47
275.30
146.52
2.10
1715.80
1.10
140.48
282.15
Main
112533
100-yr
CDR
274.47
275.30
146.52
2.10
1715.80
1.10
140.48
282.15
Main
112533
100-yr
DUP
274.47
275.30
146.52
2.10
1715.80
1.10
140.48
282.15
Main
112533
FW
REV
274.47
0.00
275.30
145.00
1.94
1715.94
1.12
139.00
140.48
282.15
284.00
Main
112533
FW
CDR
274.47
0.00
275.30
145.00
1.94
1715.94
1.12
139.00
140.48
282.15
284.00
Main
112533
FW
DUP
274.47
0.00
275.30
145.00
1.94
1715.94
1.12
139.00
140.48
282.15
284.00
Main
112614
100-yr
REV
276.85
277.74
135.31
4.86
1707.63
6.51
74.86
198.47
Main
112614
100-yr
CDR
276.85
277.74
135.31
4.86
1707.63
6.51
74.86
198.47
Main
112614
100-yr
DUP
276.85
277.74
135.31
4.86
1707.63
6.51
74.88
198.47
Main
112614
FW
REV
276.85
0.00
277.74
133.00
5.00
1707.11
6.89
72.00
74.86
198.47
205.00
Main
112614
FW
CDR
276.85
0.00
277.74
133.00
5.00
1707.11
6.89
72.00
74.86
198.47
205.00
Main
112614
FW
DUP
276.85
0.00
277.74
133.00
5.00
1707.11
6.89
72.00
74.86
198.47
205.00
Main
112709
100-yr
REV
279.40
280.24
145.64
11.61
1705.13
2.26
68.65
206.83
Main
112709
100-yr
CDR
279.40
280.24
145.64
11.61
1705.13
2.26
68.65
206.83
Main
112709
100-yr
DUP
279.40
280.24
145.64
11.61
1705.13
2.26
68.65
206.83
Main
112709
FW
REV
279.40
0.00
280.24
144.00
11.54
1705.22
2.25
65.00
68.65
206.83
209.00
Main
112709
FW
CDR
279.40
0.00
280.24
144.00
11.54
1705.22
2.25
65.00
68.65
206.83
209.00
Main
112709
FW
DUP
279.40
0.00
280.24
144.00
11.54
1705.21
2.25
65.00
68.65
206.83
209.00
Main
112798
100-yr
REV
282.23
283.08
143.08
3.58
1711.94
3.49
75.51
212.59
Main
112798
100-yr
CDR
282.23
283.08
143.08
3.58
1711.94
3.49
75.51
212.59
Main
112798
100-yr
DUP
282.23
283.08
143.08
3.58
1711.94
3.49
75.51
212.59
Main
112798
FW
REV
282.23
0.00
283.08
141.00
3.24
1712.31
3.45
74.00
75.51
212.59
215.00
Main
112798
FW
CDR
282.23
0.00
283.08
141.00
3.24
1712.31
3.45
74.00
75.51
212.59
215.00
Main
112798
FW
DUP
282.23
0.00
283.08
141.00
3.24
1712.31
3.45
74.00
75.51
212.59
215.00
Main
112885
100-yr
REV
284.81
285.65
145.65
38.52
1677.18
3.301
1 68.701
203.02
Main
112885
100-yr
CDR
284.81
285.65
145.65
38.52
1677.18
3.30
68.70
203.02
Main
112885
100-yr
DUP
284.81
285.65
145.65
38.52
1677.18
3.30
68.70
203.02
Main
112885
FW
REV
284.84
0.03
215.701
136.701
0.501
1715.39
3.10
68.50
68.701
203.02
205.20
Main
112885
FW
CDR
284.84
0.03
285.70
136.70
0.50
1715.39
3.10
68.50
68.70
203.02
205.20

ReaCh
River She
Profile
Plan
W.S. Elev
Prof Delta W S
E.G. Elev
Top W Oth Act
Q Left
Q Channel
Q Right
Eno Ste L
Ch Ste L
Ch Ste R
Eno Ste R
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(Cfs)
(Cfs)
Ws)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
Main
112885
FW
DUP
284.84
0.03
285.70
136.70
0.50
1715.39
3.10
68.50
68.70
203.02
205.20
Main
112942
100-yr
REV
286.12
286.98
143.02
33.53
1670.69
14.77
79.90
205.67
Main
112942
100-yr
CDR
286.12
286.98
143.02
33.53
1670.69
14.77
79.90
205.67
Main
112942
100-yr
DUP
286.12
286.98
143.02
33.53
1670.69
14.77
79.90
205.67
Main
112942
FW
REV
286.15
0.03
287.05
126.20
0.48
1718.28
0.24
79.70
79.90
205.67
205.90
Main
112942
FW
CDR
286.15
0.03
287.05
126.20
0.48
1718.28
0.24
79.70
79.90
205.67
205.90
Main
112942
FW
DUP
286.15
0.03
287.05
126.20
0.48
1718.28
0.24
79.70
79.90
205.67
205.90
Main
113006
100-yr
REV
287.16
287.38
159.74
60.56
1632.50
25.95
108.68
246.34
Main
113006
100-yr
CDR
287.16
287.38
159.74
60.56
1632.50
25.95
108.68
246.34
Main
113006
100-yr
DUP
287.16
287.38
159.74
60.56
1632.50
25.95
108.68
246.34
Main
113006
FW
REV
287.21
0.06
287.46
138.00
0.23
1718.65
0.12
108.50
108.68
246.34
246.50
Main
113006
FW
CDR
287.21
0.06
287.46
138.00
0.23
1718.65
0.12
108.50
108.68
246.34
246.50
Main
113006
FW
DUP
287.21
0.06
287.46
138.00
0.23
1718.65
0.12
108.50
108.68
246.34
246.50

DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
Crabtree Main "�
300
—Creek
Legend
ws 100-yr
■
Ground
290
280
c
270
w
260
250
240
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS
Plan: Revised
2/3/2020
RS = 107382
09 .05 LE .09
320
5 Legend
3104
5
W S 100-yr
300
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
290
a
280
F+� ■f�
w
270
260
250
0
100 200 300
400
560
Station (ft)
DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS
Plan: Revised
2/3/2020
RS = 107168
09 .05 .09
310
0
5
Legend
5
300
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
290
Ineff
280
Bank Sta
w
270
260
250
0
100
200 300 400 500
600
700
Station (ft)
DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS
Plan: Revised
2/3/2020
RS = 106911
09 "� .05 �� .09
<055�
310
Legend
300
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
290
•
Bank Sta
c
280
�++
w
270
260
250
0
100
200 300 400
500
600
Station (ft)

DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_IDS
Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
IRS = 106883 Cross-section immediately US of proposed bridge.
09
JL .05 —� .09
300
Legend
290
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
280
•
Bank Sta
c
270
w
260
250
240
0
50
100
150
200 250 300 350
400
Station (ft)
DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS
Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
IRS = 106837.9 BR
09
JL .05 —� .09
300
Legend
290
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
280
•
Bank Sta
c
270
w
260
250
240
0
50
100
150
200 250 300 350
400
Station (ft)
DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS
Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
IRS = 106837.9 BR
09
JL .05 — .09
290
Legend
W S 100-yr
280
■
Ground
S
270
•
Bank Sta
c
0
260
Lu
250
240
0
50
100
150
200 250 360 350
400
Station (ft)

DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_IDS Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
IRS = 106793 Cross-section immediately IDS of proposed bridge.
09 JL .05 — .09
290
Legend
280
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
S
270
•
Bank Sta
c
0
260
w
250
240
0
50 100 150 200 250 360 350
400
Station (ft)
DTL_Crabtree_Crk(B18_Strm9)_DS Plan: Revised 2/3/2020
IRS= 106629 Ties to "Crabtree Creek 151.0 (tie-in)" from ECO
.09 .05 .09 O
300
5
Legend
5
290
W S 100-yr
■
Ground
280
•
Bank Sta
c
270
m
w
260
250
240
0
200 400 600 800
1000
Station (ft)

Environmental
Services
9 000 74vu
Ax 914 743 4772
s
33h FUyettevfle Street + Raleigh, tVC 276C�2
Wake County Flood Study Checklist
Under County ordinance, encroachments into Special Flood Hazard Areas (SERA) require Permit and Certification Requirements per
Article 14, Flood Hazard Areas, of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The purpose of a Flood Study Report is to promote
the public health, safety and general welfare by reducing public and private losses caused by flood conditions in SFHA. This checklist
shows what information needs to be provided and what issues need to be addressed when preparing a Flood Study Report. All items
listed may not be applicable to each site, nor is the list all-inclusive. It is meant to serve as a guide for the engineer preparing a Flood
Study Report.
Part 1 -For all Flood Studies
Delineate Crossing sand Label On Ma (1 "e uals no more than 100') & Drawin s
�(
Provide flood study report narrative describing study objectives and include a summary of findings
/
Existing and proposed watershed, sub -watershed, and land use boundaries with supporting Zoning overlaid. Wake_County
requires Flood Study reports to be designed for upstream built out conditions.
Include all assumption for supporting methodology used for determining Cubic Feet per Second Q 100).
Drainage area worksheets delineating upstream drainage area in Acres.
Existing and proposed Tc/Tt flow paths used to calculate pre/post development flows.
Show/label all flood encroachment information, including field surveyed cross -sections referenced to station locations,
proposed culvert inverts, profile view, plan view, back slopes, all elevations, channel slope and sum of disturbed areas are
re uired.
Indicate the location and establishment of a temporary or permanent benchmark, note must be NAVD 88 for all SFHA's.
Documentation supporting applicant's choice of Manning "n" values for channel and/or over bank.
A velocity dissipater design specifying length, width, mean stone diameter, outlet velocity and detail is required for each
culvert.
Note the Minimum Finished Floor Elevation on lots that are affected by the SFHA 100yr floodplain . Example FFE = 268.4'
Should flood study design incorporate overtopping of PRIVATE driveway, specify stabilization scope and type of downstream
embankment. Overtoppingshall not exceed 0. S feet.
Place an *(asterisk) on all lots affected with flood hazards and add note to plans " * - Before Acquiring a Building Permit for
Lots Marked with an the Builder May Need to Obtain a Flood Hazard Permit from County Zoning Administration. The
NA
Builders Engineer, Architect of Surveyor Must Certify on An Permit That All Flood Hazard Requirements Are Met. There
g � Y fY Y q
Shall be No Filling or the Erection of Permanent Structures in the Areas of Wake County Flood Hazard Soils or Federal
Emergency Management Agency Flood Zones.
O/N
For submerged culverts to meet 404/401 certification, adjust the effective flow area in HEC-RAS report to reflect this
condition.
0/k
Summarize the pre -construction and the post -construction BFE at the upstream and downstream property lines before and after
the proposed encroachment.
Should flood study report prove offsite backwater, applicant must secure and record any necessary backwater encroachment
easements. For on -site backwater, label backwater area with flood elevation plus 1'.
as
Overlay and Label Future Conditions / 500 year FEMA Floodplain,
Submit draft flood study as built compliance document.
Signature, Date And Professional Seal: for all Material to be reviewed.
Part 2A For Minor Flood Studies (Drai
Inlet and Outlet Control Head Water c
area less than 100 acres
utations and elevations for all culverts
Delineate HW/D backwater area plus 1 (one) foot rise and label as Q 100 backwater easement and label FFE on all affected lots
with Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Use of Bureau of Public Roads Culvert chart for inlet and outlet computations provided for review
Part 2B For Major Flood Studies (Drainage area greater than 100 acres).
�
Inlet and Outlet Control Head Water com utations and elevations for all culverts
A
Delineate HW/D backwater area plus 1 (one) foot rise and label as Q 100 backwater easement and label FFE on all affected lots
1 WAR Sp ec al Flood Hazard Areas.
Provide Standard Step Method orequivalent computations and field surveyed cross sections locations on construction plans.

Environmental
Services
F®iz
,1. �'� .:
+� 919 850 74V0
rax 919 743 4772
Wa#er Quality► Division
336 1=ayetteville Street • Raleigh. NC 27602
www.wakegov.com
The following are minimum requirements for hydraulic �.nalyses utilizing PI�;C-RAS or �`iE�-2:
1. A narrative report stating the goals, assumptions., ar�d design concepts underlying the drainage
system and including, at minimum, the information listed below. Additional information may be
required as appropriate depending upon the size and complexity of the proj ect.
2. The report must be signed and stamped by the registered civil engineer who is in responsible
charge of preparing the hydraulic study. "
3. The report must be organized in a logical manner and a summary of the results and associated
impacts resulting from the project must be given in the text portion of the report. Specifications
for minimum content are provided below. Typical preferred report format is shown on F 1 Burt: ' .
4. A vicinity map showing the location of the project area in relationship to well-known features
5. A topographic map of the watershed containing the area being studied and upstream watershed
areas. (Maps at a 1 inch to �00 feet scale map are available from the County Department of
Public works)
6. A table indexed to the watershed map which indicates drainage area, soil and cover types, land
use, pervious infiltration rates, impervious areas and design flows for both pre -development and
post -development conditions.
7. A description of the hydrologic methods used and identification of any extraordinary hydrologic
conditions and how they were treated.
/ a) Design criteria tabulation for 10-year and 100-year storm runoff
b) Peak discharge computations for pipe sizing
c) Peak discharge computations for 100-year runoff
d) Assumptions as to upstream storage
8. The study limits must extend sufficiently far downstream to clearly establish the water surface
h elevation at the downstream end of the project.
9
. The study limits must extend a sufficient distance upstream of the project to clearly demonstrate
��` the impacts of the proposed project on the upstream properties. This generally means extending
the run upstream to the point where the baseline (or pre -project) and postproj ect water surfaces
are the same..
10. Should a floodway analysis be required, in addition to satisfying all FEMA floodway
requirements, the floodway must be established by .reducing equal conveyance in each overbank
to a point where water surface elevations increase by no more than one foot. Deviations from this
method must be must be discussed with and agreed upon by the District prior to submittal of the
floodway analysis.

� r- r -• � ,.��r
,i r � , , , 1 . 1 , � �
�- � � •
12. HEC-RAS —Cross sections must be drawn at the proper length and include a layout line
coinciding with the channel or floodplain centerline. The layout line shall be Labeled with
�� stationing on the plan sheets. The point where the layout line intersects each cross section 1s to be
set to station zero. Cross section transverse stations will be positive to the right of the layout line
and negative to the left, looking downstream. HEC-2 —Cross sections must be drawn to the
.. � � proper length with tic inares placed at the beginning and ending stations. A common beginning
station must be used. RE(�iJIRED CONTENT AND FORMAT FOR HYDRAULIC DEPORTS
-- UTILIZING HEC-RAS OR. HEC-2
13. Each cross section must be labeled with the cross section number. The label must be located at
the left end of the cross section looking downstream. The right and left "overbank" locations on
each cross-section shall be marked on the work map in some consistent fashion, i.e. a circle,
square or triangle must be placed on the cross section at each overbank Location.
�` �� � 14. The floodplain must be accurately plotted on each plan sheet
�: 15. Areas of ineffective flow must be clearly shown.
16. The underlying topography and contour labels on the work map must be legible.
17. All proposed grading, culverts, bridges, drop structures, access ramps, etc... that impact the
floodplain must be shown.
18. Proposed access roads and turnarounds must be shown.
�� 19. Proposed finished grade elevations adjacent to the floodplain must be shown. When proposed
conditions grading is shown on/over existing topography, sufficient labeling of grades at top and
toe of slopes and flowlines shall be provided to allow the reviewer to reconcile the model cross -
sections to the plan sheets
1 `' 1 1 1 � 1 .° 1
A complete hydraulic study must be provided including
20. A printout of HEC-DAS or HEC-2 input and output files must be provided. The output files
should also include at least one summary table. The report must include a narrative and, if
multiple scenarios are modeled, a table explaining the computer modeling runs. If HEC-RAS is
used, there are often multiple "Projects" and "Plans" employed. The names and interrelationship
of all component input files and output files shall be explained.
21. All ro osed adin culverts brid es dro structures access ram s etc... that im act the
p p � g> g� p � p� p
floodplain must be included in the modeling.
22. A CD-DOM with the input and output files shall be included in the report package.
23. A channel centerline profile plot showing thalweg elevation, water surface elevation and critical
de th must be rovided. The thalwe need not necessaril coincide with the la out line.
p p g y y
24. Cross section plots for all cross sections, plotted at no more than four per each 81/2 x 11 sheet
must be provided. Each cross section must be labeled with the cross section number and must

• •section,• . • • . • • • •• • ues
ver the cross section. If feasible it is greatly preferred that the scale of the cross section plots be
•' '
25. A description of the Ii�Ianning's "n" values used and explanation for why they were chosen must
be provided.
VAll. 26. A description of and a rational explanation for how the upstream and downstream boundary
conditions were established must be provided in the report narrative and should be annotated in
the hydraulic input file comment fields.
27. Photographs of the existing study reach should be included if it is felt they will assist in
conveying information to the reviewer.

Erosion and Sediment Control Design Calculations

PLDPiedmont Laid Design, LLP
8522-204 Sig Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27615 • [phone] • Fag: [phone]
Erosion Control Calculations
For
Triangle Quarry RDU Expansion
Wake County, North Carolina
C Al g0C�'f�
�� ®• •�ESS1
• A o s
n SEA
t 08
Issued:
February 12, 2020
Prepared for:
Wake Stone Corporation
PO Box 190
Knightdale NC 27545
Civil Engineers • Landscape Architects • Land Planners

Table of Contents
Section
Appendix A — Sediment Basin Calculations
Appendix B — Sediment Basin Skimmer Sizing Calculations
Appendix C — Temporary Diversion Ditch/Slope Drain Calculations
Appendix D — Calculations for Permanent Culverts under Berm

Appendix A
Sediment Basin Calculations

BASIN
DA
(Acres)
c
Design
Storm
Q10
REQUIRED
SA
(sf)
REQUIRED
VOLUME
(cf)
MIN
L
(ft)
MIN
W
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
PROVIDED
SA
(sf)
PROVIDED
VOLUME
(cf)
TYPE
1
5.7
0.5
10-yr
20.58
6,688
10,260
120
60
2
7,114
12,882
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
2
5.7
0.5
10-yr
20.58
6,688
10,260
120
60
2
7,114
12,882
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
3
8.0
0.5
25-yr
32.76
10,647
14,400
155
70
2
10,764
19,874
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
4
40.0
0.5
25-yr
163.80
71,253
72,000
SEE
PLAN
2
71,174
129,462
RISER BASIN
5
0.8
0.5
10-yr
2.89
1,256
1,440
46
29
2
1,334
2,084
SEDIMENT BASIN
6
1.3
0.5
10-yr
4.69
2,041
2,340
77
28
2
2,067
3,388
SEDIMENT BASIN
7
1.7
0.5
10-yr
6.14
2,670
3,060
77
36
2
2,683
4,582
SEDIMENT BASIN

MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR CONTINUATION
PLD
PIEDMONT LAND DESIGN, LLP
xms
-j
F-fta
_J
S
5-7--
�Nag
001,
rf
f
1$1N
11Y
j,
'16
--- ---------
Up
Vf! NP
v� --------
'Aj
f I "vq
0
xl
71
311rJV�4
f W
-
PRELIMINARY
Iz NOT FOR CONMUCTTON
7A rp
'1\1t,�j j
v
yi ;f Z P,
Vv�ll
J
o'
<
x�
z
0
cc <
W
N\`.
go
-9s U) Z
.0,41 —,v I <
w
ix
C3
... . ... ....
-nl
V,
ISSUED: PROGRESS
Ju
RE RFVISIONS:
zz t
. uAq
W
%k
w
1
%
o1r,
V\
IX
0
b-,
-Z\>
! I', :, ,`;;I�:,1 ` '':+.,';II,i�r I: ili 1 ` ix , `\ i \ .i>L �/ ':'r I/., �'/''— 10p�/r
DRAWN BY: RPH
< CHECKED BY: PH
PROJECT: WSRDUO
N
SED BASIN
DA MAP
"OL" NORTH
...... ....
DWG. NO. DA. 1

Appendix B
Sediment Basin Skimmer Sizing Calculations

i
Estimate Volume of Basin Length Width
Top of water surface in feet - Feet VOLUME 0 Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet Feet
Depth in feet Feet

&A-Sl,j -4-S
Estimate Volume of Basin Length width
Top of water surface in feet Feet VOLUME 0 Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet
Feet
Depth in feet Feet

Estimate Volume of Basin Length Width
Top of water surface in feet Feet VOLUME 0 Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet Feet
Depth in feet Feet

Estimate Volume of Basin Length Width
Top of water surface in feet Feet VOLUME 0';Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet Feet
Depth in feet Feet

64-511\1 =4-�
Estimate Volume of Basin Length width
Top of water surface in feet Feet VOLUME 0 Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet
Feet
Depth in feet Feet

154 'SIW /:tr-7
Estimate Volume of Basin Length Width
Top of water surface in feet . � 5 � _ .. : Feet VOLUME � 0 Cu. Ft.
Bottom dimensions in feet
Feet
Depth in feet Feet

Appendix C
Temporary Diversion Ditch/Slope Drain Calculations

REQUIRED
MINIMUM
MINIMUM
USE
Basin Slope Drain
DA
Q
AREA
DIA
DIA
(AC)
(CFS)
(SF)
(FT)
(INCHES)
(INCHES)
BASIN #1
5.7
20.58
3.49
2.11
25.29
30
BASIN #2
5.7
20.58
3.49
2.11
25.29
24
BASIN #3 FROM WEST
5.8
20.94
3.55
2.13
25.51
30
BASIN #3 FROM EAST
1.1
3.97
0.67
0.93
11.11
15
BASIN #4
10.5
37.91
6.42
2.86
34.33
36

Eastern Diversion Ditch Design
ALLOWABLE
Diversion DRAINAGE Total DA C
Q(25)
SLOPE
DEPTH SHEAR STRESS
SHEAR STRESS
AREA (AC) (CFS)
(CFS)
(FT/FT)
(FT) (PSF)
(PSF) LINER
1A 11.00 11.00 0.5
45.05
0.005
1.92 0.60
1.45 Straw w/net
1B 13.00 24.00 0.5
98.28
0.005
2.14 0.67
1.45 Straw w/net
* This is a check of the temporary liner for the large
eastern diversion ditch
along Crabtree Creek entering Basin #4.
See plan.

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Diversion 1A
Trapezoidal
Bottom Width (ft)
= 3.00
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 2.00, 2.00
Total Depth (ft)
= 2.00
Invert Elev (ft)
= 100.00
Slope (%)
= 0.50
N-Value
= 0.033
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 45.00
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
Wednesday, Apr 1 2020
= 1.92
= 45.00
= 13.13
= 3.43
= 11.59
= 1.41
= 10.68
= 2.10
Elev (ft) Section Depth (ft)
103.00
3.00
102.50
102.00
101.50
2.50
2.00
1.50
lie
101.00
1.00
100.50
0.50
100.00
00 rr)
0.00
0 50
2 4 6
8
Reach (ft)
10 12 14
16

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Diversion 1 B
Trapezoidal
Bottom Width (ft)
= 7.00
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 2.00, 2.00
Total Depth (ft)
= 2.50
Invert Elev (ft)
= 100.00
Slope (%)
= 0.50
N-Value
= 0.033
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 98.00
Elev (ft) Section
103.00
102.50
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
Wednesday, Apr 1 2020
= 2.14
= 98.00
= 24.14
= 4.06
= 16.57
= 1.57
= 15.56
= 2.40
Depth (ft)
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
1 11
_n rn
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 VVV
Reach (ft)

Western Diversion Ditch Design
ALLOWABLE
Diversion DRAINAGE Total DA C Q(25) SLOPE DEPTH SHEAR STRESS SHEAR STRESS
AREA (AC) (CFS) (CFS) (FT/FT) (FT) (PSF) (PSF) LINER
western 10.50 10.50 0.5 43.00 0.005 1.87 0.58 1.45 Straw w/net
* This is a check of the temporary liner for the western diversion ditch
entering Basin #4. See plan.

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Westgern Diversion into Basin 4
Trapezoidal
Bottom Width (ft)
= 3.00
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 2.00, 2.00
Total Depth (ft)
= 2.00
Invert Elev (ft)
= 100.00
Slope (%)
= 0.50
N-Value
= 0.033
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 43.00
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
Wednesday, Apr 1 2020
= 1.87
= 43.00
= 12.60
= 3.41
= 11.36
= 1.38
= 10.48
= 2.05
Elev (ft) Section Depth (ft)
103.00
3.00
102.50
102.00
101.50
2.50
2.00
1.50
101.00
1.00
100.50
0.50
100.00
00 rr)
0.00
0 50
2 4 6
8
Reach (ft)
10 12 14
16

I ( I I
II 1 I \ I I \ 1 I I J1
'l''//lJ-�I'/iii
'l/
I
I
'w,_ _ N
�.
t\_
% / II \ IIIIII
" //// 11 ll�hl'/irl IIII �i� 1 I II'iill i rrr/ l /r rrri;
,/��-
-_-'-
`, 1 1 I I I I I-''i� /i' �/ r \ 1 1 I I I III / I I IIII I I I �I I1 ,1IIIpII I{!III1IryIII IIIIIIIII�
qIt,'A; IFT� a`4,%r ,.� ! , / `\\\ \ \ \ I I \ , li I„' I11,11 ;; i I i I I I" ,illllillnlpJ�l iiiiiil\\\\
\\\ I I - \I I I11111111 /// / I' //I II IIIII IIIIIIII`I IIII.
I 11 1 / I 11 Ilpl l ,
I 1� I I IIII
I I I I I I I II I I I V � l 1 I I ll IIII
1 III I I 1���'-
yIrdl(1� ll;;'1,,, III a lr;,ll;,;,'
ll/%Ip��Q��
�� \ '� r'�''" /III IIII IIII �YI l \ 1,11/lll11111111l �llrrii%�
\ /r� / //�l11/�_,•�'h'" !�/ r / �(_ I,/i��0%p'p/lil`///%✓r /l I'
I
'
-
�� f //�.( ``''CCl po/�+' IwwI111 I IIII I��_�',�/// /ll �� rr /� „�/�' � 99//✓✓ iii,///� r riiii i�'g7i'ii'� i � " / /�--_'
✓IYCT�71�'I IjIIIIJII�x�T///%''/ llI 1 41" ' //� / // //I/ II�/I'l//%jrx II
;\I\'1 ,I -1
II,10i I
/
l
`��
I ;\\\ �\.\\�\`II °��\�\:"C�J�� - )III �I II��i �ly;; �ll ; Il f�z I✓'^'I I- ; ' ;''
=
_���--'-'//, /�'/. rim � � -•l/�, II;'�' ;I�I -L :'; ! 11 ;;;';; ;' � /; ;'/rx/
100 Yr
Ov
1;>\ Mix
1 IJ, 1 ✓ ; ; I�/;;/' /�; 'r\, ` NORTH
' r I
8522-204 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
919.845.7600 PHONE
919.845.7703 FAX
ENGR. FIRM LICENSE #F-0843
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED: PROGRESS
DRAWN BY: RPH
CHECKED BY: RPH
PROJECT: WSRDUQ
EASTERN
DIVERSION DITCH
DA MAP
DWG. NO. DA.Z

Appendix D
Calculations for Permanent Culverts Under Berm

\�\
,
' IL
\ -
x
amr' -_- --
-__- -
l
1 •11 ' 1 J 1 - NIN
i, ` \ `\ `,\ \'\ , i1 ; ----'---`
1
IN
` I
J
`\``\
1
IN ` , ` t
/ i 1 � � it ' i i` i � __ / /r i i J � � i r-. `°: •i •', \ ``', `•i •1 i
------------
\\,, IN
11Y5 ! '.I 1ii11 1,\1 \, j ; / -'1'1 `,II •,, I I ; , /;
,I II 1\\I ,11• ,` ;
' _-•i'=_`_,_ ..____� '_ � -r/ram �'i
----%-_fir:
IN t
iX
DA T01F6S-21
.S
i
_--___r . -_-_T
------------------___ _
I
\ '
II
% NORTH
PIEDMONT LAND DESIGN, LLP
.,' : aArAm Ina
sm m umm 0-�
IPRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUMON
Q
z
—i
Y0
Qa
av
W =
ao
y Z
`D Z
c+ w
C
O C Q
ISSUED: PROGRESS
DRAWN BY: RPH
CHECKED BY: RPH
PROJECT: WSRDUQ
STORM SEWER
DA MAP
DWG. No. DA.3

Storm Sewer Tabulation
Page 1
Station
Len
Drng Area
Rnoff
Area x C
Tc
Rain
Total
Cap
Vel
Pipe
Invert Elev
HGL Elev
Grnd / Rim Elev
Line ID
coeff
(I)
flow
full
Line
To
Incr
Total
Inn cr
Total
Inlet
Syst
Size
Slope
Dn
Up
Dn
Up
Dn
Up
Line
(ft)
(ac)
(ac)
(C)
(min)
(min)
(in/hr)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft/s)
(in)
M
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
1
End
140.306
3.90
3.90
0.40
1.56
1.56
5.0
5.0
8.2
12.77
20.40
10.49
15
9.98
331.00
345.00
332.21
346.22
0.61
1.31
Pipe - (76)
2
End
175.966
2.00
2.00
0.40
0.80
0.80
5.0
5.0
8.2
6.55
20.94
6.23
15
10.51
323.50
342.00
324.47
343.03
0.43
1.31
Pipe - (77)
Project File: WSRDUQ storm.stm
Number of lines: 2
Run Date: 4/1/2020
NOTES:Intensity = 118.92 / (Inlet time + 17.60) ^ 0.86; Return period =Yrs. 25 ; c = cir e = ellip b = box
Storm Sewers v2019.20

Appendices
Rev. I Z 93
NEW YORK DOT DISSIPATOR METHOD
FOR USE IN DEFINED CHANNELS
(Source: 'Bank and channel lining procedures", New York Department
of Transportation, Division of Design and Construction, 1971.)
Note: To use the following chart you must know:
(1) Q full capacity
(2) Qto
(3) V full
(4) Vto
where Q = discharge in cfs and V = Velocity in FPS.
ESTIMATION OF STONE SIZE AND DIMENSIONS FOR
CULVERT APRONS
Step I) Compute flow velocity Vo at culvert or paved channel outlet.
Step 2) For pipe culverts Do is diameter.
For pipe arch, arch and box culverts, and paved channel outlets,
Do=Ao, where A.= cross sectional area of [low at outlet.
For multiple culverts, use Do=1.25xDo of single culvert.
Step 3) For apron grades of 1.0% or steeper, use recommendations
For next higher zone. (Zones 1 through 6).
in 15-
a
U
}°
5—
®m
WHOM.
..�
NIK
S
-®
NEW
o• s'
Figure 8.06. 1
S
PIP€
r
1 I. I I
10, 15' 20' 25'
DIAMETER (Ft.)
8.06.5

0
W
Z
(A1 APRON MATERK
LIENGM
OF APRON
O PROTECT CULVERT
L1
TO PREVENT SCOUR
HOLE USE L2 ALWAYS
L2
1
STONE FILLING (FINE) CL A
3 x Do
4 x Do
2
TONE FILLING (LIGHT) CL.'8,
a x -Do
65x',Do
3
STONE FILLING (MEDIUM) CIL t .
4 x- Do
A;; Do`
4
STONE FILLING (HEAVY) ; CL 1
I 4 x Do
;8 x`Do
5
STONE FILLING (HEAVY) CL 2
S x Do
10 x Do
6
STONE FILLING (HEAVY) CL. 2
6 x Do
10 x Do
7 SPECIAL STUDY REQUIRED (ENERGY DISSIPATORS, STILLING
BASIN OR LARGER SIZE STONE).
Fig. 3.06.b.2
4— Width = 3'times pipe dia. (min.)
DETERMINATION OF STONE SIXES FOR DUMPED STONE
CHANNEL LININGS AND REVETMENTS
Step 1) Use figure 3.06.b.3 to determine maximum stone size (e.g. for 12
Fps=20" or 550 lbs.
Step 2) Use figure 3.06.b.4 to determine acceptable. size range for stone
(for 12 FPS it is 125-500 Ibs.. for 75% of stone, and the maximum.
and minimum range in weight should be 25-500 lbs.)
Note: In determining channel velocities for stone linings and revetment, use
the following coefficients of roughness:
Diameter Mannin's Min. thickness
(inches) „n,. of fining (inches)
A Fine 3 0.031 9 12
$ Light .6 0.035 12 13
i &tedium 13 • 0.040 18 24
2; Heavy 23 0.044 36 36
(Channels) (Dissapators)
2�r
I
8.06.6 Rev. 1203
�t

Hydrogeological Assessment Report

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the
Triangle Quarry
Wake County., North Carolina
Prepared for
Wake Stone Corporation
PO Box 190
Knightdale, North Carolina 27545
Prepared by
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
4300 Sapphire Court, Suite 100
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Telephone [phone]
April 7, 2020
SE At
•et 1060 F �.
z G
�I '� �• oL VGA S4
I��� S K

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
Table of Contents
Page
1.0
Introduction............................................................................................................ 1
2.0
Hydrogeologic Setting and Mine Observations............................................................ 1
2.1 Local Hydrogeology of the Mine Site............................................................... 1
2.2 Hydrology of Crabtree Creek.......................................................................... 3
3.0
Field Evaluations..................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Stream Flow Study....................................................................................... 4
3.2 Groundwater Evaluation................................................................................ 5
4.0
Discussion and Conclusions...................................................................................... 6
4.1 Crabtree Creek Flow Monitoring..................................................................... 6
4.2 Groundwater Evaluation Discussion................................................................ 7
5.0
Report Certification.................................................................................................. 8
6.0
References............................................................................................................. 8
Figures
Figure 1. Map of the Triangle Quarry and Vicinity
Figure 2. Local Geologic Map near the Triangle Quarry
Figure 3. Example of Diurnal Flow Documented at USGS Gaging Station 0208726005 —
Crabtree Creek at Ebenezer Church Road.
Figure 4. Streamflow Measurement Stations
Figure 5. Channel Profile Station 1
Figure 6. Channel Profile Station 2
Figure 7. Channel Profile Station 3
Figure 8. Channel Profile State Park Station
Figure 9. Monitoring Well Location Map
Figure 10. Groundwater Equipotential Map of the Bedrock Aquifer, February 19, 2020
Figure 11. Groundwater Equipotential Map of the Bedrock Aquifer, April 2, 2020
Tables
Table 1. Stream Flow Gaging Results
Table 2. Water Level Measurements from Monitoring Wells and Core Holes
Appendices
Appendix I. Site Photographs
Appendix II. Records of Sump Withdrawals Reported for 2019.
Appendix III. Stream Gage Data from USGS Crabtree Creek Station — Ebenezer Church Road
Appendix IV. Stream Monitoring Data from January 30, 2020
Appendix V. Well Construction Records

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
1.0 Introduction
Wake Stone Corporation (Wake Stone) operates an aggregate mine known as the Triangle
Quarry in Wake County, North Carolina. The quarry address is 222 Star Lane, Cary, NC, and
the quarry is located near the intersection of Harrison Avenue and US Interstate 40 (Figure 1).
The Triangle Quarry has been operated for nearly 40 years, and the existing pit covers an area
of approximately 73 acres. The total depth of the existing pit is approximately 400 feet, and
Wake Stone has limited accessible mineral resources remaining within the existing mine permit
area.
Wake Stone plans to expand their quarry operation to 105 acres of land to the west of the
existing quarry (Figure 1). Wake Stone is evaluating the property and developing a mine permit
application to conduct aggregate mining on the new tract. As a part of the mine permit
documents, Wake Stone must evaluate potential impacts on the groundwater system associated
with dewatering of the new open -pit mine. Because Crabtree Creek borders the expansion
property to the south and east, the groundwater evaluation must also address potential
interactions between the proposed mine and surface water flow in Crabtree Creek.
Wake Stone contracted Groundwater Management Associates, Inc. (GMA) to provide a
hydrogeological evaluation of the existing and proposed quarry sites. The following report
presents GMA's evaluation results.
2.0 Hydrogeologic Setting and Mine Observations
2.1 Local Hydrogeology of the Mine Site
The Triangle Quarry extracts crystalline metamorphic and metavolcanic rocks for use as a
crushed stone aggregate. The site lies within the Raleigh lithotectonic belt of the North
Carolina Piedmont Physiographic Province (NCGS, 1985). The lithology at the existing mine site
includes Cambrian to Late Proterozoic age biotite gneiss and schist, locally mapped as the Big
Lake — Raven Rock Schist, and the Reedy Creek Metagranodiorite (Blake and Clark, 2016). The
lithology beneath the proposed mine expansion property, immediately west of the currently
active mine, is Cambrian to Late Proterozoic age metavolcanic rock, locally mapped as the Pots
Branch Greenstone (Blake and Clark, 2016). Figure 2 illustrates the local geology near the mine
site.
Rocks exposed in the active quarry pit reveal a prominent foliation that strikes approximately
N45E and dips steeply (about 50 degrees) to the northwest. One mafic igneous dike is also
exposed in the northern section of the mine. Appendix I includes site photographs of the active
mine pit illustrating the prominent foliation of the rocks exposed in the mine.
Page 1

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
The open pit mine is a dry mine operation, meaning that water that enters the pit through
groundwater seepage and precipitation, and both are removed from the mine via a sump in the
bottom of the pit. The current sump elevation is approximately 50 feet below mean sea level
(MSL), and the average water level in the sump is approximately -40 feet MSL. Wake Stone
typically pumps from the sump about 4 to 11 days per month to maintain a dry pit. Reported
withdrawals in 2019 (NCDEQ, 2020), included only 76 days of pumping, with the average
withdrawal rate for pumping days being 0.958 million gallons per day (MGD). So, the total
annual withdrawal in 2019 from the sump was approximately 73 million gallons per year.
Averaging this annual withdrawal to a per -day equivalent for 2019 provides an average daily
withdrawal of 0.20 MGD, or about 139 gallons per minute. Water withdrawn from the sump is
used for dust suppression and processing of aggregate. Excess water, not needed as make-up
water in the closed -loop process water system, is discharged through the north pond according
to the operation's NPDES permit. The outfall from the north pond drains into Crabtree Creek
northeast of the pit (Figure 1). Flow from the outfall is intermittent. Wake Stone reported 29
days of discharge from the outfall in 2019. Appendix II includes records of pit sump
withdrawals reported for 2019.
The estimated groundwater recharge to the area of the Triangle Quarry is 400,000 gallons per
day per square mile (Heath, 1994). The active mine site covers an area of approximately 0.15
square miles, so the normal groundwater recharge rate within the footprint of the active quarry
pit is estimated to be about 60,000 gallons per day.
The Raleigh area receives an annual average precipitation of approximately 48 inches of rainfall
equivalent (NC Climate Office, 2020). Applying this precipitation rate over the footprint of the
active mine gives an estimate of stormwater contribution (approximately 122.35 million gallons
per year, or an average of approximately 0.335 MGD) to the pit. Comparing the estimated
stormwater flow into the pit with the reported sump withdrawals from 2019, and considering
that a significant portion of precipitation returns to the atmosphere via evaporation, it is evident
the groundwater flow contribution into the pit from outside the active mine must be very small.
Because porosity of typical Piedmont crystalline rocks is 0.01 to 2% (Heath, 1984), the bedrock
contains a very small amount of water as storage. Likewise, permeability of Piedmont rocks is
low. This condition leads to very small and narrow cones of depression around pumping wells
and open pit quarries. Local fractures and fault systems within the Piedmont may exhibit
significantly higher permeability than unfractured rock matrix, and when such features occur,
drawdown around points of withdrawal (wells or mines) may extend preferentially along these
enhanced permeability features for significant distances away from the pumping center. When
large local fractures intersect a mine face, these features are readily observed by local wetting
of the mine face and obvious local flow into the pit.
Page 2

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
The active mine pit at the Triangle Quarry exhibits a remarkably dry mine face. GMA observed
the mine on December 10, 2019, and the quarry pit did not indicate local wetting or other
indications of significant preferential flow of groundwater into the pit (see Appendix I). We
observed one mafic igneous dike cutting across the pit in the northern portion of the mine, but
this darker rock did not exhibit wetness or enhanced groundwater seepage into the pit. It was
especially notable that the mine face closest to Crabtree Creek along the western and northern
portions of the pit exhibited only minimal wetness or groundwater seepage into the pit. These
anecdotal data suggest that Crabtree Creek does not lose a significant amount of flow as the
creek passes close to the open pit mine.
2.2 Hydrology of Crabtree Creek
Crabtree Creek is an urban stream, and the flow characteristics are significantly affected by
anthropogenic development, especially in areas upstream of the Triangle Quarry. The local
stream channel adjacent to the Triangle Quarry and downstream from the quarry into the
Umstead State Park appears to be mostly natural. However, the hydrology of the system
feeding this section of Crabtree Creek is not natural.
Upstream from the Triangle Quarry are two major alterations in the stream system: Lake
Crabtree (an approximately 430-acre manmade impoundment), and the Town of Cary
Wastewater Treatment Plant effluent discharge. The Crabtree Lake maintains an average pond
elevation of approximately 274 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1987). Stormwater that falls
within the catchment of Crabtree Lake is retained behind the dam, and flows into Crabtree
Creek via a spillway below the dam. GMA is unaware of any metering of flows from the
Crabtree Lake spillway.
The Town of Cary treats municipal wastewater at the North Cary Water Reclamation Facility
(WRF) on Old Reedy Creek Road. The WRF is rated for 12 MGD treatment capacity, and the
treated wastewater effluent is discharged directly to Crabtree Creek approximately 0.6 miles
upstream from the Triangle Quarry location. The timing and volumes of wastewater discharged
into Crabtree Creek by the Town of Cary WRF significantly affect the flow characteristics of
Crabtree Creek near the Triangle Quarry. According to Paul Ray (Town of Cary) the North Cary
WRF discharged 6.18 MGD on January 30, 2020 (personal communication, 3/3/2020). The
WRF only report daily totals, so details of timing of wastewater effluent discharges are not
available. If discharges from the WRF were continuous and constant, the reported discharge
volume from January 30, 2020 would equate to approximately 9.6 cubic feet per second.
In addition, Local tributaries that feed Crabtree Creek near the Triangle Quarry are impounded
(e.g., Foxcroft Lake and Reedy Creek Lake). These impoundments further alter the timing and
volumes of stormwater and groundwater flow into the creek.
Page 3

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
Overall flow in Crabtree Creek is dynamic, and significant diurnal patterns of flow volumes are
documented by the USGS at their Ebenezer Church Road gaging station (Station ID
0208726005) located approximately 3 miles downstream from the Triangle Quarry (Figure 1).
Figure 3 illustrates the diurnal nature of flow dynamics at Crabtree Creek as recorded by the
USGS gaging station. Daily fluctuations of flow on the order of 15 to 30 cubic feet per second
(CFS) were recorded at the gaging station between January 28, 2020 and January 31, 2020.
Superimposed upon the diurnal fluctuations are larger -scale flow events related to local
precipitation and stormwater flow into the creek. The dynamic flow characteristics of Crabtree
Creek significantly affect the assessment of potential baseflow stream loss from Crabtree Creek
in the vicinity of the Triangle Quarry.
3.0 Field Evaluations
GMA devised a study scope that entailed office research coupled with field data collection to
gain an understanding of the hydrogeologic setting of the site and to evaluate interactions
between local flow in Crabtree Creek and groundwater flow conditions on the mining properties.
The focus was to characterize the hydrologic system in the context of the existing mine as a
proxy for understanding the hydrologic effects of the proposed mine expansion. This
characterization included stream flow measurements in Crabtree Creek as well as groundwater
level measurements in existing and newly constructed wells.
3.1 Stream Flow Study
GMA estimated stream discharge at four sites on Crabtree Creek on January 30, 2020 (Figure
4). These included one upstream location (Station 1), two locations adjacent to the Triangle
Quarry (Station 2 and Station 3) and one location approximately 0.5 mile downstream from the
quarry (State Park Station).
Stream discharge (Q) is the rate of flow or the volume of water that passes through a channel
cross section in a specific period of time. GMA used the velocity -area technique to calculate
stream discharge at each monitoring station. For this technique, discharge was calculated as
the product of surface water velocity and cross -sectional area of the water in the channel.
Methods employed by GMA for this project followed guidance from the USGS and the National
Nonpoint Source Monitoring Program (Carter and Davidian, 1989; Meals and Dressing, 2008).
GMA selected stream discharge measurement locations that were reasonably straight and free
of large rocks or obstructions. At each station, GMA waded into the stream and measured the
width of the stream perpendicular to flow using an open reel measuring tape. We divided the
stream width into segments so that each segment did not represent more than 10% of the total
streamflow, and we measured the depth of each segment using a stadia rod.
Page 4

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
GMA also measured water velocity within each segment using a Global Water FP211 Flow Probe
velocity meter. This meter has a minimum reporting limit of 0.1 ft/second. At all stations, the
stream was shallow and wadeable. Therefore, GMA used the one -point method to measure
water velocity within each segment. For the one -point method, velocity was measured at 0.6
the total depth for that segment. Water velocity is not uniform throughout the water column
and is influence by factors such as friction with the channel bed and overall channel geometry.
Previous studies have shown that velocity at a position 0.6 the distance from the water surface
to the stream bed is, however, a good approximation for average water velocity within a
channel section (Leopold et al. 1964). According to Harmel, et al. (2006), the calculated
cumulative probable uncertainty for the standard streamflow measurement methods is f6% for
average conditions.
For velocity measurements collected from Crabtree Creek, GMA recorded the average velocity
from 15 seconds of monitoring at 0.6 times the stream depth. GMA calculated the stream
discharge for each segment as the area of each segment (the product of segment width and
segment depth) multiplied by the velocity measured in that segment. We then summed the
discharges of each individual segment to obtain to an estimate of total discharge for the stream
at each location.
Table 1 presents the estimated stream flow volumes from each monitoring station. These flow
estimations are instantaneous flows at the time of data collection, and the units are reported as
cubic feet per second (CFS). Figures 5 through 8 illustrate the channel profiles at each
measurement station.
3.2 Groundwater Evaluation
GMA worked with Wake Stone to evaluate the groundwater conditions beneath the expansion
property. Wake Stone drilled multiple core holes on the expansion property to evaluate the
lithology and rock quality for mine planning. As a part of this core -drilling program, five holes
were constructed as monitoring wells with permanent well casings. Figure 9 illustrates the
monitoring well locations. Appendix V includes the well construction records for the five new
monitoring wells. Wake Stone arranged surveying of the locations and reference point
elevations for the wells. Table 2 presents the location and reference point elevation data
associated with the wells.
On February 19, 2020, GMA collected static water levels from the five monitoring wells on the
expansion property. In addition, we measured water levels in an uncased core hole (Core N)
located on the pit perimeter road between the quarry pit and Crabtree Creek. Water -level
measurements were collected using an electronic water -level meter, and values were measured
to the nearest 0.01 feet. Appendix 1 includes photographs of example monitoring wells and
Page 5

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
water level measurement methods. Table 2 presents the water -level measurements. GMA
used the reference point elevations from each well and core hole to calculate the groundwater
elevations from each station. In addition, we considered the estimated elevations (from LIDAR
data) of Crabtree Creek adjacent to the Triangle Quarry pit. We considered the assigned creek
elevations as groundwater base levels along the stream. Wake Stone reported to GMA the
sump water elevation (40 feet below mean sea level) from the base of the quarry pit. These
groundwater and surface -water elevation values were used to produce a contour map depicting
the current interpreted groundwater elevations beneath the expansion property (Figure 10).
Subsequent to the February 19, 2020 monitoring event, GMA recognized that additional wells
exist on the active mine property that could be accessed for supplemental water -level
monitoring. GMA determined that these supplemental well locations were important for
depicting the equipotential surface surrounding the active quarry pit. On April 2, 2020, a GMA
hydrogeologist visited the Triangle Quarry site to collect additional static water levels. This
monitoring event incorporated data from two additional wells, the "Shop Well", and the "QC Lab
Well" (Figure 9). Wake Stone provided survey data of the locations and reference point
elevations for the two additional well locations. Figure 11 presents the equipotential contour
map of water levels collected from April 2, 2020.
4.0 Discussion and Conclusions
4.1 Crabtree Creek Flow Monitoring
Stream flow monitoring of Crabtree Creek demonstrates a significant stream flow in the vicinity
of the Triangle Quarry pit. The flow measured from Stations 1 through 3 ranged from 49.7 CFS
to 50.3 CFS. These values are essentially the same flow, when considering the ±6% accuracy
of the methods of measurement. The stream gaging data provide no evidence of measurable
stream losses from Crabtree Creek in close proximity to the active quarry pit. The stream flow
measurements from Stations 1 through 3 do indicate a modest increase in flow as the
monitoring progressed to Station 3. However, Station 3 was located downstream of the
effluent from the settling ponds that handle water withdrawn from the quarry sump. GMA
separately measured the flow from the settling pond (called Tributary from Pond in Table 1),
and the increased flow documented at Station 3 can be attributed, at least in part, to the flow
into Crabtree Creek from the Tributary Pond.
The monitoring station located approximately 0.5 mile downstream from the quarry (State Park
Station) revealed an anomalously lower value of flow (45.3 CFS) when compared to flow
measurements from Stations 1-3. GMA recognizes several likely explanations for this
anomalously lower flow measurement:
Page 6

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
• Flow measurements at the State Park Station were collected 2 hours after the next
closest upstream station (Station 3). As is shown in Figure 3, stream flow in Crabtree
Creek can vary significantly over short spans of time. These variations in flow are
attributable, in part, to variations in discharge from the North Cary Water Reclamation
Facility. Unfortunately, the Town of Cary only accounts for daily flow volumes
discharged from the facility, so details of discharge variability from the WRF are not
available to help understand the streamflow monitoring results from the State Park
Station.
• The State Park Station is located downstream from an historic dam structure across
the creek. This old mill dam partially impounds flow in the creek, and the flows
measured at the location selected for the State Park Station may be affected by
proximity to the dam.
• The State Park Station also included a large sand and gravel bar along the shoreline.
This permeable section of sediment deposition may locally absorb a small percentage
of stream flow as ephemeral groundwater flow along the channel margin. This type of
ephemeral groundwater flow within stream channel deposits would not be accounted
for by the stream gaging measurements.
Although GMA measured a reduced stream discharge at the State Park Station, the reduced
flow documented at that location is not attributable to water withdrawals from the active quarry
pit. The State Park Station is far removed from the limited area of drawdown around the active
quarry pit, as discussed below.
4.2 Groundwater Evaluation Discussion
GMA produced contour maps of pertinent water -level data from monitoring wells and the
elevation of the active quarry sump. These data were contoured for both the active mine area
and the surrounding area, with special emphasis on the proposed new mine tract. GMA
recognizes that contours of the equipotential surface from the limited data within the active
mine, as shown in Figures 10 and 11, are theoretical contours, because the contoured
equipotential surface is above the elevation of the bottom surface of portions of the active
mine. Based on these contoured head values, and our previous discussion of recharge to, and
discharge from, the active quarry, GMA concludes the following:
• The cone of depression associated with active mining is very small;
• The anticipated cone of depression associated with mining of the new tract is also
expected to be small because similar low -permeability igneous/metamorphic rocks
characterize the new tract.
Page 7

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
5.0 Report Certification
This report was prepared by Groundwater Management Associates, Inc., a professional
corporation licensed to practice geology (NC Corporate License No. C-121) and engineering (NC
Corporate License No. C-0854) in North Carolina. We, Richard K. Spruill and James K. Holley,
North Carolina Licensed Geologists for GMA, do certify that the information contained in this
report is correct and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
`%%%Isstsssssssls*j r,
Cato +,
l
40
•
Richard K. Spruill, Ph.D.EP.d. 942
Principal H dro eolo ist' p*.' �:
00
lit
6.0 References:
ss� C A�01
SEAL •
•
s
4`0 6 0
James K. Holley, P.G�
Senior H dro eolo iAw..�''� �`.
Y 9 9 ., ,� • Q j OG
,,, X �.•
,1 S K. M ��•`
Blake, D.E., and T.W. Clark, 2016 "Geologic Map of the Cary 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Wake and
Durham Counties, North Carolina", North Carolina Geological Survey Open File Report
2016-02, 1 sheet.
Carter, R.W., and J. Davidian. 1989. Techniques of Water -Resources Investigations of the
United States Geological Survey, Chapter A6 in General Procedure for Gaging Streams,
Book 3 Applications of Hydraulics. 13 p.
Clark, T.W. D.E. Blake, E.F. Stoddard, P.A. Carpenter, III, and R.H. Carpenter, 2004,
"Preliminary Bedrock Geologic Map of the Raleigh 30'x60' Quadrangle, North Carolina",
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Land
Resources, NCGS Open File Report 2004-02, 1 sheet.
Harmel, R.D., R. J. Cooper, R. M. Slade, R. L. Haney, J. G. Arnold, 2006, Cumulative
Uncertainty in Measured Streamflow and Water Quality Data for Small Watersheds,
Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Vol. 49(3):
pages 689-701.
Heath, R.C., 1984, "Ground -Water Regions of the United States", United States Geological
Survey Water -Supply Paper 2242, P. 46.
Heath, R.C., March 1994, 'Ground -Water Recharge in North Carolina", a Report Prepared for
the Groundwater Section, Division of Environmental Management, North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, 57 pages.
Page 8

Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Triangle Quarry
Wake County, NC
April 7, 2020
Leopold, L., Wolman, G. and J. Miller, 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Dover
Publications, Inc. New York, New York, 544 p.
Meals, D. and S. Dressing. 2008, Surface water flow measurement for water quality monitoring
projects, Tech Notes 3, March 2008. Developed for US EPA by Tetra Tech, Inc., Fairfax
VA, 16 p.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, "Geologic Map of North Carolina", North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of Land
Resources, Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500,000, 1 sheet.
North Carolina Climate Office, 2020, 'Averages and Normals", on-line information obtained from
NC State University website https://climate.ncsu.edu/edu/Normals , accessed April 3,
2020.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, 2020, "2019 Annual Water Use Report,
Wake Stone Corporation, Triangle Quarry", Water Withdrawal and Transfer Registration,
on-line report from https://www.ncwater.org/WUDC/app/WWATR/report/view/0202-
0004/2019, accessed 4/6/2020.
Ray, Paul, March 3 and 5, 2020, Town of Cary NWRF Manager, Personal Communication with
Kelley Smith, Geologist at GMA.
United States Geological Survey, 1987, 7.5 Minute Cary, NC Topographic Quadrangle Map, 1
sheet.
Page 9

STATION 1
7STATION 2 -- STATION 3
EXISTING ,,%f TRI -FROM POND
STATE PARK STATION
UMSTEAD
STATE
PARK
'•.
WAKE
STONE
.� PROPERTY
1'=2mi
-LEGEND- ���
STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATION L, USGS STREAM GAUGING STATION SCALE IN FEET
0 1500'
NORTH CARY WRF DISCHARGE 'I. J FUTURE PIT PERIMETER �`� GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
File: DRAWINGS/163401 MAP OF THE TRIANGLE QUARRY AND VICINITY DATE: 4/7/2020
FIG1 SITE MAP.mxd
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY FIGURE 1

l ! _ eq 46 9 " 47
I [ T M s- .1
7
a. ! CZpbg 'CZpbg .'
•�
46
48 ? I--
�'d
�cs
°s°ad
l : ; I
_�1 .. r � 44 39
CZslg
I �r. I
o
� �
.8
•�o o :; �
00
'� 5 .o
r 'r
_
52 � 381 _ 42 62 5
7
CZC 57
g
! 1
A °°
s a
E
o
— ° -A °
as
63 �' r :` f
56`
° r
m o o°
'a c
f �II 67 �f7
r' 47 67 + f / 6T
43 47 I CZbr,79
CZbr, s
4a
1
54 I Gta1
R94r
W 835
�o8b
j c
_a'm
a c
'50 f
IF+JJ62 57f CZSIg64
35� •{ 52
68�
4!
CZbr, J '52 �ti l'
7a�r i 159
62 52►
1 60
1.y�����8
m°
. w
9 a
69
If+ 54�
Y
wo
v
'Eiao
42
f r/ 39
931 �I �i
A.:
3fi
► 67�
I
"4 y Dal ' +�CY96-1931-2.o
61 1 J �' I, I.I ` L, -.:1j
{`. ?•
8
.� .o ��
.�
o it s
•� Mir,i',
-�f 5?i I
50 6 60 1
�' CY96-1938D. + I
l'C: i ft• 1V"I
_ CZtCa'
C P
e 5'� J $
e.�
y iti5
58
52�46'
-o •-1 - r ..
�. ..I _
1 sy. `.,` r
; :j nlCZslg
-
49
. 1+i+ ,
1 J
50 IJf r !� �-=�5'
-
I .III • I .
/J
45 59 1
�T�
eao�s
a2w�
�61 7
54 h, t
r l r' 'I n 1
e o ? c�
u o w
58 :' yI
rr "ate•
J
Ili' �
`
4 0 A
a� o
—
s
43 Gal I�
44
sn8'E
_
CZbr, •+
CY9&-18 70 °
~'
u e=
u
u s e5
.f"
4 .. tI6 • r . n
61
FJlu
LA■�
;47
__-
u
-REFERENCE-
Blake, D. and Clark,, 2000, Geologic map of the Cary 7.5-minute Quadrangle,
Blake, T.
SCALE IN FEET
GMA
Wake County, North Carolina: North Carolina DENR Geological Survey Open File Report 2000-2, 1:24,000-scale map 0
1740' (APPROX.)
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
File: DRAWINGS/163401/
LOCAL GEOLOGIC MAP NEAR THE TRIANGLE QUARRY
Date:
04/07/2020
FIGURES/FIG2
PROJECT 163401
WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY
FIGURE 2

120
110
100
90
Z3 80
v
v
70
0
3
,° 60
50
40
30
Figure 3. Diurnal Flow Documented at USGS Gaging Station 0208726005 - Crabtree
Creek at Ebenezer Church Road
Diurnal Flow Variation
20
1/28/2020 0:00 1/28/2020 12:00 1/29/2020 0:00 1/29/2020 12:00 1/30/2020 0:00 1/30/2020 12:00 1/31/2020 0:00 1/31/2020 12:00

T THIS PRODUCT IS FOR GENERAL REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED.
AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR. S URVEY OR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. LOCATIONS ARE APPROxIrAATE.
:f.
irk � �`faIFt``'§I'�.•�•t: �5f�..�..-: xrowr-.rn,��..
STATION 1
1/30/20 9:45
49.7 CFS
` � I 1/30/20 13:05
STATION 2 50.3 CFS
E a •.� '��. 1/30/2012:00
49.5 CFS
TRIB FROM POND
1/30/20 0.3 CFS
13:50
' STATE PARK STATION
1 /30/20 15:00
45.3 CFS
UMSTEAD
STATE
PARK
WAKE
STONE
1
I
x - PROPERTY 1"= 2 m i
-LEGEND- GMA
STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATION � USGS STREAM GAUGING STATION (0208726005) SCALE IN FEET
0 1500'
NORTH CARY WRF DISCHARGE �_ J FUTURE PIT PERIMETER I
i
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
CFS = CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
File: DRAWINGS/163401 STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATIONS DATE: 4/7/2020
Stream stations.mxd
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY FIGURE 4

-3
0 10 20 30
Distance from Left Bank (ft)
40
VE=2x
-LEGEND- GMA /\
DEPTH MEASUREMENT BELOW WATER SURFACE v
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE: GMA/163401/ CHANNEL PROFILE - STATION 1
FIGURES/FIG5 DATE: 04/07/2020
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY FIGURE 5

0
3
-LEGEND-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ... ... ... ... .... ........................ ................ ............. ... ... .. ............... ........................
ti.... .. . .......
0 10 Distance from Left Bank (ft) 30 40
VE= 2x
MA
DEPTH MEASUREMENT BELOW WATER SURFACE
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE: GMA/163401/ CHANNEL PROFILE-- STATION 2
FIGURES/FIG6 DATE: 0407/2020
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY FIGURE 6

3
0
-LEGEND-
10
DEPTH MEASUREMENT BELOW WATER SURFACE
20 330
Distance from Left Bank (ft)
40
50
VE=2x
GMA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE: GMA/163401/ CHANNEL PROFILE - STATION 3
FIGURES/FIG7 I I DATE: 4/07/2020
I PROJECT 163401 1 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY I FIGURE 7 1

I
-LEGEND-
10 20
Distance from Left Bank (ft)
30
VE=2x
MA
DEPTH MEASUREMENT BELOW WATER SURFACE
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE: GMA/163401/ CHANNEL PROFILE - STATE PARK STATION
FIGURES/FIG8 DATE: 04/02/2020
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY FIGURE 8

STATION 1
UMSTEAD
STATE
PARK
4
P
w
WA KE
STONE THIS PRODUCT IS FOR GENERAL REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY ANO SHOULD NOT BE USED,
PROPERTY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR, SURVEYOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES LOGATIONSAREI,:'I (MATE
Ll AND
-LEGEND-
STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATION FUTURE PIT PERIMETER
NORTH CARY WRF DISCHARGE �--+
0 EQUIP. DATA POINT (FT ELEV) EQUIP. DATA POINT OUTSIDE ACTIVE
z� USGS STREAM GAUGING STATION QUARRY BOUNDARY (FT ELEV)
File: DRAWINGS/163401 MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP
FIG9 MW LOCATION MAP.mxd
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY
STATION 3
's
iL
C.I. = 5 FT.
GMA
SCALE IN FEET
0 650'
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATE: 4/7/2020
FIGURE 9

STATION 1
UMSTEAD '� zwg
STATE
PARK
F+
STATION 3
STATION 2
TRIB FROM
�c POND
was •, ...,��.� :r''I �:�,.:
AL—
tyt
W
WAKE
STONE THIS PRODUCT 15 FOR GENERAL REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED,
PROPERTY 1" = 2 mi AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR, SURVEYOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
-LEGEND- C.I. = 5 FT.
STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATION ;"—+ FUTURE PIT PERIMETER SCALE IN FEET
NORTH CARY WRF DISCHARGE +--+
0 EQUIP. DATA POINT (FT ELEV) EQUIP. DATA POINT OUTSIDE ACTIVE
G USGS STREAM GAUGING STATION QUARRY BOUNDARY (FT ELEV)
File: DRAWINGS/163401 GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFER (FEB. 19, 2020)
EQUIP MAP 20200219.mxd
PROJECT 163401 WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY
GMA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATE: 4/7/2020
FIGURE 10

♦ *,
s` N s,
STATION 1
0
STATION 3 L--
STATION 2
TRIB FROM
- POND
SUMP POND
20
^HOP
UMSTEAD
STATE
_
PARK
LAB'
388.06.
WAKE
,o
STONE
THIS PRODUCT IS FOR GENERAL REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLYANR SHOULD NOT BE USER,
PROPERTY mi
ANOIS NOT INTENDED FOR, SURVEYOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
-LEGEND-
THEOR. EQUIP. LINE WITHIN ACTIVE QUARRY (FT ELEV)
C.I.
= 20 FT.
MA
STREAMFLOW MEASUREMENT STATION
NORTH CARY WRF DISCHARGE
i'-+
i FUTURE PIT PERIMETER
SCALE IN FEET
EQUIP. DATA POINT (FT ELEV)
EQUIP. DATA POINT OUTSIDE ACTIVE 0
650'
G USGS STREAM GAUGING STATION
QUARRY BOUNDARY (FT ELEV) �`�
GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
File: DRAWINGS/163401
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFER (APRIL 2, 2020)
DATE: 4/7/2020
EQUIP MAP 20200402.mxd
PROJECT 163401
WAKE STONE CORP. - TRIANGLE QUARRY
FIGURE 11

Table 1. Streamflow Gauging Results
Wake Stone Corportion - Triangle Quarry
GMA Project #: 163401
Station Name
Latitude
Longitude
Date & Time of
Measurement
Q (ft3/s)
Station 1
N 35.83888
W 078.78058
1/30/2020 9:45
49.7
Station 2
N 35.84026
W 078.77283
1/30/2020 12:00
49.5
Station 3
N 35.84179
W 078.76128
1/30/2020 13:05
50.3
State Park
N 35.84385
W 078.75500
1/30/2020 15:00
45.3
Tributary from Pond
I N 35.84105
1 W 078.76248
1/30/2020 13:50
1 0.3
Q = discharge as calculated using the area -velocity method

Table 2. Monitoring Well Location and Groundwater Elevation Data -Triangle Quarry
Station ID
NORTHING (ft)
EASTING (ft)
Latitude
Longitude
Reference Elevation
(ft MSL)
20/19/2020 Water
Depth (ft)
02/19/2020 Water
Elevation (ft)
04/02/2020 Water
Depth (ft)
04/02/2020 Water
Elevation (ft)
OW-1 CORE H
761461.73
2066736.91
35.8420042°
-078.7748255'
346.36
48.46
297.9
48.56
297.8
OW-2 CORE 1
760946.16
2066765.99
35.8405877°
-078.77473130
331.88
66.51
265.37
66.81
265.07
OW-3 CORE J
761440.70
2065738.08
35.84195260
-078.77819580
341.49
37.53
303.96
36.88
304.61
OW-4 CORE L
761129.24
2065331.22
35.84109950
-078.77957090
333.49
51.44
282.05
51.43
282.06
PMW-1
761750.46
2065838.42
35.84280300
-078.77785490
356.15
51.20
304.95
50.73
305.42
TQSHOP
759203.80
2068039.89
35.8357930°
-078.77044680
424.13
NM
NM
87.02
337.11
TQQ/CLAB
758547.61
2069388.89
35.83398160
-078.76590080
428.23
NM
NM
40.17
388.06
SUMP POND
760087.19
2068097.82
35.8382195°
-078.77024450
NA
-40A
CORE N
760117.17
2067683.96
35.8383045°
-078.7716405°
320.82
55.80
265.02
55.80
265.02
NM = Not Measured
NA = Not Applicable
A = Approximated Average Sump Water Elevation from Available Pit Survey

Appendix I.
Site Photographs

South -looking view of the active Triangle Quarry pit.

1 e �
3 2d,
�� 1y ! ✓ ;1 I \mil �

Southeast -looking view showing the foliation of rocks in the quarry pit.

, 10 ,AQ As y�i
5MI-I
Southeast -looking view of the eastern wall of the Triangle Quarry pit.

?t,
r
1
I

. 4.017-1
*A, -MA
Example of water -level measurement methods.

}/
�
qE Lab Well used for water level measurement On 4 2 2O2&

r
U
R
-
E / N
r ..
'� •, , 4j -
-77

Appendix II.
Records of Sump Withdrawals Reported for 2019.

DWR :: Water Withdrawal and Transfer Registration
https://www.ncwater.org/WUDC/app/W WATR/report/view/0202-0004/2019
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
Water Withdrawal and Transfer Registration
• Overview
• Reports
• FAQ
• NCID
• Login
2019 Annual Water Use Report
Section 1: Facility Information
Registrant:
Wake Stone Corporation
Facility ID:
0202-0004
Facility Name:
Triangle Quarry
Facility Type:
Mining
County:
Wake
Sub -Basin:
Nauss River (10-1)
Mailing Address:
222 Star Lane
Cary, NC 27513
Email:
[e-mail]
Contact Person:
David F. Lee
Title:
Environmental Supervisor
Phone:
919-266-1100
Fax:
919-266-1149
Section 2: Withdrawal Information
2-A. Average daily withdrawal and maximum day withdrawal by month in million gallons per day (MGD)
Month
# of Days
Average Daily
Maximum Day
Month
# of Days
Average Daily
Maximum Day
Used
Withdrawal (MGD)
Withdrawal (MGD)
Used
Withdrawal (MGD)
Withdrawal (MGD)
Jan
6
1.018
1.320
Jul
7
1.155
1.815
Feb
8
1.073
2.640
Aug
11
0.885
1.815
Mar
7
0.896
1.485
Sep
1
1.495
1.495
Apr
7
1.768
3.960
Oct
2
0.743
0.990
May
4
0.454
0.660
Nov
4
1.361
2.145
Jun
10
0.446
0.660
Dec
9
0.770
1.815
2-B. Source Information - Please complete one row for each water withdrawal source. If any of your source information was imported from a previous year, please make sure you
click edit and fill in the information left blank that is needed for the 2019 reporting year.
Source Name Source Type Average Daily Days Used Pumping Capacity (MGD)
Pit Sump Quarry 0.958 76 3.960
Section 3: Discharge Information
3-A. Average daily discharge and maximum day discharge by month in million gallons per day (MGD)
Month
# of Days
Average Daily
Maximum Day
Month
# of Days
Average Daily
Maximum Day
Discharged
Discharge (MGD)
Discharge (MGD)
Discharged
Discharge (MGD)
Discharge (MGD)
Jan
0
0.000
0.000
Jul
5
1.122
1.815
Feb
0
0.000
0.000
Aug
5
1.221
1.650
Mar
2
0.660
0.990
Sep
0
0.000
0.000
Apr
6
1.980
3.960
Oct
1
0.990
0.990
May
0
0.000
0.000
Nov
3
1.265
2.145
Jun
0
0.000
0.000
Dec
7
0.778
1.815
3-B. Please complete one row for each discharge method. If any of your discharge information was imported from a previous year, please make sure you click edit and fill in the
information left blank that is needed for the 2019 reporting year.
Identifier or Permit Number Discharge Type Average Daily Days Discharged Discharge Capacity
NCG0200001 Surface Water 1.229 29 3.960
Section 4: Sub -Basin Transfer Information
Complete this section only if you withdraw or purchase water that is not returned to the sub -basin from which it was withdrawn.
4-A. Please complete one row for each transfer of surface water from one sub -basin to another. If any of your transfer information was imported from a previous year, please make
1 of 2 4/6/2020, 12:56 PM

DWR :: Water Withdrawal and Transfer Registration
https://www.ncwater.org/WUDC/app/WWATR/report/view/0202-0004/2019
sure you click edit and fill in the information left blank that is needed for the 2019 reporting
year.
Description of Transfer Source Sub -Basin
Receiving Sub -Basin Transfer Capacity
No Transfers Listed.
4-B. Enter the average daily and maximum day surface water transfer amount for each month in million gallons per day (MGD)
# of Days Average Daily Maximum Day
Month
# of Days Average Daily Maximum Day
Month
Transferred Transfer(MGD) Transfer(MGD)
Transferred Transfer(MGD) Transfer(MGD)
Jan
Jul
Feb
Aug
Mar
Sep
Apr
Oct
May
Nov
Jun
Dec
Do you have any comments?
DEQ Division of Water Resources • 1611 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Disclaimer • NCDEQ • NC.gov • © 2020 NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
2 of 2 4/6/2020, 12:56 PM

Appendix III.
Stream Gage Data from USGS Crabtree Creek Station — Ebenezer Church Road

>GS Current Conditions for USGS 0208726005 CRABTREE CR ... https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwWuv?cb 00060--on&cb 00065=o...
USGS 8288726885 CRABTREE CR AT EBENEZER CHURCH RD HR RALEIGH, NC
78
68
0
66
W
as
64
a
62
m
4 68
58
56
to 54'.
�o
r
52
c-- - --- -- --
56
88:86 84:88 881.88 12:88 16:88 28:88 88:68
Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 31
2828 2828 2828 2828 2828 2828 2828
Median daily statistic (29 years) Period of approved data
— Discharge
Add up to 2 more sites and replot for "Discharge, cubic feet per second"
Add site numbers
Note
Enter up to 2 site
numbers separated by
a comma. A site
number consists of 8
to 15 digits
GO
Create presentation -quality_ / stand-alone graph. Subscribe to
WaterAlert
Share this graph I
Gage height, feet
Most recent instantaneous value: 4.24 04-01-2020 14:45 EDT

3GS Current Conditions for USGS 0208726005 CRABTREE CR ... bttps://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwis/uv?cb-00060=on&cb-00065=o...
4.35
4.38
4j
4.25
r 4.20
a,o
.0 4.15
a�
as
4.10
4.85
4.88
88•.88
Jan 38
2828
USGS 0208726005 CRABTREE CR AT EBENEZER CHURCH RU MR RALEIGH, NC
84•.88 08.88
12'.88
16:00 28:88 88.88
Jan 38 Jan 36
Jan 38
Jan 38 Jan 38 Jan 31
2828 2828
2828
2828 2828 2828
— Gage height
—_'
Period of approved data
Add up to 2 more sites and replot for "Gage height, feet"
Add site numbers
N ote
Enter up to 2 site
numbers separated by
a comma. A site
number consists of 8
to 15 digits
GO
Create presentation -quality / stand-alone graph. Subscribe to
WaterAlert
Share this graph
Questions about sites/data?
Feedback on this web site
Automated retrievals
Help
Data Tips
Explanation of terms
Subscribe for system changes

Appendix IV.
Stream Monitoring Data from January 30, 2020

Appendix A. Streamflow Gauging Measurements and Calculations
Wake Stone Corportion - Triangle Quarry
GMA Project #: 163401
Station ID
Average
Distance Depth as Velocity at
from Left Negative 0.6 Depth Area of Section Discharge
Bank (ft) Depth (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft-2) (ft^3/s)
0
0
0
-
-
-
2
1.01
-1.01
0.4
0.2525
0.101
4
1.14
-1.14
0.5
1.8
0.9
8
1.35
-1.35
0.5
3.4925
1.74625
12
1.7
-1.7
1.1
5.47
6.017
16
1.85
-1.85
1
6.7
6.7
20
2
-2
1.2
7.4
8.88
0
24
2.41
-2.41
1.1
8.13
8.943
19
28
2.59
-2.59
0.9
9.525
8.5725
"'
32
2.79
-2.79
0.6
10.37
6.222
36
2.66
-2.66
0.05
10.995
0.54975
40
1.85
-1.85
0.05
10.3
0.515
44
0.96
-0.96
0.05
7.36
0.368
45.8
0.2
-0.2
0.05
3.058
0.1529
46
1 0
0
-
-
-
TOTAL (ft^3/s) 49.7
0
0
0
-
-
-
2
1.16
-1.16
0.1
2.505
0.2505
4
1.9
-1.9
0.1
5.725
0.5725
8
2.32
-2.32
0.4
9.205
3.682
12
2.59
-2.59
0.6
7.825
4.695
14
3.35
-3.35
0.5
6.5075
3.25375
16
3.34
-3.34
0.5
9.9525
4.97625
20
3.2
-3.2
0.4
12.445
4.978
4.1
24
2.35
-2.35
0.8
9.6
7.68
U,
28
1.9
-1.9
1.3
7.685
9.9905
32
1.62
-1.62
1.1
6.57
7.227
36
1.52
-1.52
0.4
5.92
2.368
40
1.1
-1.1
0.05
3.36
0.168
42
0.5
-0.5
0.05
0.711875
0.0355938
42.25
0.48
-0.48
0.05
0.120625
0.0060313
42.51
01
01
1 -
TOTAL (ft^3/s) 49.9
Page 1 of 2

Appendix A. Streamflow Gauging Measurements and Calculations
Wake Stone Corportion - Triangle Quarry
GMA Project #: 163401
Station ID
Average
Distance Depth as Velocity at
from Left Negative 0.6 Depth Area of Section Discharge
Bank (ft) Depth (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft-2) (ft^3/s)
1
0
0
-
-
-
1.5
0.5
-0.5
0.4
1.70625
0.6825
6.5
1.03
-1.03
0.3
4.675
1.4025
11.5
0.8
-0.8
0.4
4.45625
1.7825
16.5
1.3
-1.3
1.1
6.38125
7.019375
21.5
1.61
-1.61
1.1
7.79375
8.573125
26.5
1.51
-1.51
1
7.54375
7.54375
31.5
1.4
-1.4
0.8
7.0875
5.67
U,
36.5
1.43
-1.43
0.7
6.95
4.865
41.5
1.14
-1.14
1.1
5.79375
6.373125
46.5
1
-1
0.9
5.09375
4.584375
51.5
1.01
-1.01
0.4
4.425625
1.77025
56
0.36
-0.36
0.05
1.220625
0.0610313
56.251
01
0
-1
- I
-
TOTAL (ft^3/s) 50.3
E
0
0
0
0
-
-
0.75
0.475
-0.475
0.91
0.375
0.3375
a
L
~EL
1.5
0
0
0
-
-
TOTAL (ft^3/s)
0.3
0
0
0
0
-
-
0.1
0.15
-0.15
0.2
0.515
0.103
3
1
-1
0.4
2.925
1.17
6
1.65
-1.65
0.7
4.8525
3.39675
9
2.04
-2.04
0.8
6.1275
4.902
L
12
2.45
-2.45
1.1
7.155
7.8705
a
15
2.34
-2.34
1.2
6.97875
8.3745
4.1
18
2.12
-2.12
1.3
6.36
8.268
UO
21
1.9
-1.9
1
5.61375
5.61375
24
1.45
-1.45
0.7
4.35
3.045
27
1
-1
0.6
2.98875
1.79325
30
0.52
-0.52
0.6
1.22
0.732
31
0
0
0 - -
TOTAL (ft^3/s) 45.3
Page 2of2

Appendix V.
Well Construction Records

For Intemal Use Only:
L Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856
NC Well. Contractor Certification. Numbed
Carolina SoillInvestigations, LLC
Company Narne
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501 385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. (.,,K. (:ounly, .State, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
FlAgricultural
DMunicipal/Public
nGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
DResidential Water Supply (single)
n Industrial/Commercial
nResidential Water Supply (shared)
El lrriatjon
El Wells> 1001000 GPD
Non -Water Supply Well:
M Monitoring
EIRecovery
Injection Well:
ElAquifer Recharge
ElGroundwater Remediation
ElAquifer Storage and Recovery
ElSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test
ElStormwater Drainage
DExperimental Technology
El Subsidence Control
DGeothermal (Closed Loop)
ElTracer
DGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
ElOther (explain under 411. Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/04/2020 Well ID# PMW- 1
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake 0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well. field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8428 N 78.7779 W
6. Is(are) the well(s): MPermanent or OTemporary
7.1s this a repair to an existing well: D Yes or Li
ffthis is a repair,fill out known well construction iqlbrination and explain the nature of the
repair under 821 remarks section or on the back of thisforin.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only I GW- I is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 94, Open: 263
17or multiple wells list all depths ifd4 V ,fL,rent (example- 3 @.200'and 2@10(1')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 51.201 (02/19/2020)_
If water level is above casing, use
I L.Borehole diameter: 6.51f & 41# (in.)
A
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
(ft.)
- ---- -- -------
14.WATERZONES
DESCRIPTION
1111111VIRBUM9
11111MMILM. Iff*13,1111 Mt, VT1
lx�svlfrqlw�,
MATERIAL
MATERLAL
MATERIAL
01130INTE IMMIRSE
E V.7"I 9
WKSIMIN
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
V 117
1
II
RI,Ied clay
Brown silt
Fractured PWR
•
Rock - dark green volcanic rock.
Rock - dark green volcan-ic rock.
21. REMA"s
---- - ------ __J
94-263' Open bedrock borehole by 4" air rotary percussion.
22. Certification:
2/4/2020
Signature of Certified Well Comkric_t_or Date
By signing 1hisjbrin, I hereby certi& that the well(,•) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A N(-'A(-" 02C.0100 or 15A NCACO2(7.0200 Well (__'onstruclion Standards and that a copy,
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(acid 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 161.7 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (IUC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR., CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Penult Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-16 11
13b. Disinfection type: - Amount:
Form GW- I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-201.8

For Internal Use Only:
L Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification. Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501 385
List all applicable well construction, permits (i.e. (,J(7, (�-'ount`y, ;Slate, Variance, etc..)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
ElAgricultural.
ElMunicipal/Public
ElGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
DResidential Water Supply (single)
1:1 Industrial/Commercial
F1 Residential Water Supply (shared)
El Irriution
[:] Wells > 100,000 GPD
Non -Water Supply Well:
MMonitoring
EIRecovery
Injection Well:
ElAquifer Recharge
FlGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery
ElSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test
❑Stormwater Drainage
ElExperimental Technology
R Subsidence Control
DGeothermal (Closed Loop)
nTracer
nGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
ElOther (explain under 421 -Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/01/2020 Well ID# OW- 1
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake 0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8420 N N 78.7748 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): MPermanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Dyes or MNo
If is a repair, fill out known well construction infiWilation and explain the nature of the
repair under 1121 remarks section or on the back of thisjbrtn.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction., only I GW- I is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 94
h7or multiple wells list all depths .fL,rent (example- 3-4200' and 2 @400')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 48.461 (02/19/2020)
If water level is above casing, use
t 1. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.)
A -
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
DESCRIPTION
EM#
MATERIAL
01111=31111W.- MR %I
®If-
E#111*%Q�.=
MATERIAL
I 17. $CREEN
Symmmill
Mzmms�
- EM " M , =
­ - --- ---- - -
MATERIAL
RAVEL PA"(WA1P1*#01q­­­­111
=2111thl
Eve
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
*711111,1
an OEM". M. IM' F M "11, IM MR
JflM19i#U#t t
Red, clay
Tan/Brown-silt (sap. rock)
green/brown soft rock
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-344
22. Certification:
2/1/2020
Signature of Certified Nell Cd ractor Date
By signing this forin, I hereby certify that the vvell(�) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A N(,A(_'02C.0100 or 15A NCACO2(7.0200 Well Construction Stan(lards and that a copy
(?f this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add'See Over'ln Remarks Box). You may also attach. additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For tRiection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (IUC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Well producing over 1.00,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: - Amount:
Form. GW- I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-20 1, 8

For Internal Use Only:
L Wel.1 Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-1
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501 385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. (1IC1 County, Vale, Variance, etc.-)
3. Well Use (check well use). -
Water Supply Well:
RAgricultural
RMunicipal/Public
RGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
DResidential Water Supply (single)
El Industrial/Commercial
El Residential Water Supply (shared)
El Irrigation
[]Wells > 1005000 GPD
Non -Water Supply Fell:
ItMonitoring
DRecovery
Injection Well:
ElAquifer Recharge
ElGroundwater Rernediation
E]Aquifer Storage and Recovery
E]Salinity Barrier
ElAquifer Test
E]Stormwater Drainage
RExperimental Technology
El Subsidence Control
RGeothermal (Closed Loop)
1:1 Tracer
RGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
ElOther (explain under 921 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 1/29/2020 Well ID#OW-2
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake 0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(If well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8406 N N 78.7747 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): [Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: 1771 Yes or IlNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction in1brmation and explain the nature of the
repair under 11121 remarks section or on the back of thisjbrin.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only I GW- I is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: C.Pa -sing: 86
P'or multil71e wells 1W all depths i1*dij .ferent (example- 3(g,20(1'and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 66.51 (02/19/2020).
If water level is above casing-, use "-4
14. WATER ZONES
DESCRIPTION
Ems 01131irem-, rM I "#I I
DIAMETER
EVIWW�l
MATERIAL
,Gal. Steel
E M4 M23117; MIRM I%
llllllllltf#V�
�=
DIAMETER___
17. N
L MATERIAL
M
Neat Cement
M SAWGRAVEL PACK
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
WN
Ml It R M11 01"M
Tan/Brown/Green silt - sap. rock
Fractured PWR
Sound dark green rock.
well was NQ diamond cored from 86' to 369.7' by another drilling contractor
22. Certification:
1/29/2020
Signature of Certified ell t ntractor Date
4v signing this form, I hereb - y certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NC 02('.0100 or 15A NC AC 02(7.0200 Well Construction :Standards and that a copy
Qf thin record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
(ft.) Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information. Processing Unit 1617 MSC, Raleigh NC 27699-1617
11. -Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.) 24b. For Injection Wells.- Copy to DWR-, Underground Injection Control (IUC)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) 24c. For. Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR, WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: - Amount:
Form GW- I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

9 1 111
#A 16
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification. Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501 385
List all applicable well construction pern 7 Its (I.e. UK7, Couniv,:Slate, Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
ElAgricultural
E]Municipal/Public
OGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
El Residential Water Supply (single)
El Industrial/Commercial
nResidential Water Supply (shared)
EJ lrriation
E]Wells > 100,000 GPD
Non -Water Supply Well:
I!lMonitoring
DRecovery
Injection Well:
FlAquifer Recharge
nGroundwater Rernediation
0Aquifer Storage and Recovery
ElSalinity Barrier
n Aquifer Test
OStormwater Drainage
nExperimental Technology
n Subsidence Control
ElGeothermal (Closed Loop)
nTracer
DGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
0 Other (explain under 421 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/05/2020 Well ID#OW-3
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility 1D# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake 0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8420 N N 78.7782 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): MPermanent or OTemporary
7.1s this a repair to an existing well: F-1 Yes or ('1No
ffthis is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature qf'the
repair under 1121 remarks section or on the back of thl's,Jgrin.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only I GW- I is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled-
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 71
h7or multiple wells list all depths 1'dif .A,rent (example- 3 @v200'and 2@ 100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 37.531(02/19/2020)
ffwater level is above casing, use .... ..
14. WATER ZONES
DESCRIPTION
01111%151511�svlf
rNg"IM!
MATERIAL
MINCEITIMMeno !Vni
MATERIAL
17. SCREEN
18. GROUT
I W11 11M I X 111111#1 1TV1W.V1
MATERIAL
Red clay
Orange/tan silt soft sap. rock
fractured
Fractured sound dark green rock.
well was; NQ diamond cored from 71'to 237.2by another drilling contractorl,
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-3449
22. Certification:
2/5/2020
Signature of Certified Well C, itractor Date
I3v signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A V(-AC 02C'. 0100 or 15A IV( -AC.' 02C. 0200 Fell C'onstruction .5tantlards and that a cops
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 161.7 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.) 24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR., Underground Injection Control (IUC)
I I Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion 24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 1.00,000 GPI : Copy toDWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Pen -nit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW- I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

For Internal Use Only:
L Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil -Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501 385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. (JIC, (.'ouqv, Slate, Variance, etc..)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
FlAgricultural
EiMunicipal/Public
ElGeothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
DResident ial Water Supply (single)
El Industrial/Commercial
F-1 Residential Water Supply (shared)
El lrriation
E]Wells > 1003000 GPD
Non -Water Supply Well:
[!Monitoring
EIRecovery
Injection Well:
[]Aquifer Recharge
RGroundwater Rernediation
ElAquifer Storage and Recovery
R Salinity Barrier
ElAquifer Test
FlStorrnwater Drainage
ElExperimental Technology
RSubsidence Control
RGeothen-nal (Closed Loop)
FlTracer
-]Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
ether (explain under#21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/03/2020 Well ID# OW-4
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake 0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(If well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8411 N N 78.7796 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): MPermanent or OTemporary
7.1s this a repair to an existing well: F-1 Yes or MNo
If is a repairfill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under 1121 remarks, section or on the back of this. brin.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction., only I GW- I is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
drilled:
f% ^
9. Total well depth below land surface: 00
h7or multiple wells list all depths ifdij ,ferent (e ample- 30v-200'and 2ay, 100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 51.44 (02/19/2020)
If water level is, above casing, use
M
14. WATER ZONtS
DESCRIPTION
DIAMETER
MATERIAL
al. Steel
MATERI.
IAL
17. SCRUN
Ell
gxVIXIM131MEL-1
18. GROUT
MATERIA
0*112FEWOKSIMIMISH [0111 W-UNIMMM
•
Neat Cement
a
■
19. ��D/GRAVEL PACK Of
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
Rock - dark green.
well was NQ diamond cored from 63' to 236. V by another drilling contractor
22. Certification:
2/3/2020
Signature of Certified Well ContiaicK Date
I3y sign in, 7
this form, I herebi certi& that the well(y) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCA(702C.0100 or 15A N(,'�C 02C.0200 ff,'ell (_'onstruction.51antlartls and that a colt,
of this recortl has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 161.7 MSC, Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1617
I L Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.) 24b. For Injection Wells: Copy toDWR., Underground Injection Control (IUC)
Air Rotary Percussion Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1.636
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) 24c.For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR. WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Pen -nit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: - Amount:
Form GW- I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

Monitoring Well Construction Records

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 2, 2020
David F. Lee
Wake Stone Corporation
P.O. Box 190
Knightdale, NC 27545
Subject: Monitoring Well Construction
Permit # WM0501385
RDU
Raleigh, NC
To whom it may concern:
1-1/--
�t tvE� v l/- It5p-5
In accordance with the application received on December 30, 2019, we are forwarding
herewith Monitoring Well Construction Permit No. WM0501385 dated January 2, 2020, issued
for the construction of a monitor well system (installation of five monitoring wells) at the subject
property. Please be aware that some counties have well construction programs, and you may
be required to obtain a well construction permit before installation.
This Permit will be effective from the date of its issuance and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please note the addition of stipulation #3 to the
permit enclosed.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: RRO Files
Wake County Environmental Services
E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 1 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Noani cr 0H �'
DWe MM ��'� /'� 919.791.4200

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITORING WELL
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, North Carolina General Statutes, and other applicable
Laws, Rules and Regulations.
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Wake Stone Corporation
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITOR WELL SYSTEM (RDU) consisting of a monitoring well system
(five monitoring wells) owned by Wake Stone Corporation at mailing address P.O. Box 190 Knightdale, NC 27545.
Five monitoring wells will be located on ppro erly owned by Raleigh Durham International Airport, located at 2800
Airport Blvd, Raleigh, NC (PIN 0767324317�. This Permit is issued in accordance with the application received on
December 30, 2019 which is filed with the Department of Environmental Quality and are considered integral parts of
this Permit.
This Permit is for well construction only, and does not waive any provision or requirement of any other applicable
law or regulation. Construction of any well under this Permit shall be in strict compliance with the North Carolina
Well Construction Regulations and Standards (15A NCAC 02C .0100), and other State and Local Laws and
regulations pertaining to well construction.
If any requirements or limitations specified in this Permit are unacceptable, you have a right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within 30 days of receipt of this Permit. The request must be in the form of a written petition
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this Permit
is final and binding.
This Permit will be effective for one year from the date of its issuance and shall be subject to other specified conditions,
limitations, or exceptions as follows:
1. Issuance of this Permit does not obligate reimbursement from State trust funds, if these wells are being
installed as part of an investigation for contamination from an underground storage tank or dry cleaner
incident.
2. Issuance of this Permit does not supersede any other agreement, permit, or requirement issued by another
agency.
3. The well(s) shall be located and constructed as shown on the attachments submitted as part of the Permit
application.
4. Each well shall have a Well Contractor Identification Plate in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108(o).
5. Well construction records (GW-1) for each well shall be submitted to the Division of Water Resource's
Information Processing Unit within 30 days of the well completion.
6. When the well is discontinued or abandoned, it shall be abandoned in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0113
and a well abandonment record (GW-30) shall be submitted to the Division of Water Resource's Information
Processing Unit within 30 days of the well abandonment.
7. If the well penetrates any water -bearing zone that contains contaminated waters, the upper three feet of the
well shall be grouted within one day after the casing is set or the well abandoned.
8. Temporary wells must be permanently abandoned or converted to a permanent well within seven days (168
hours) of the completion of drilling of the borehole.
Permit issued the 30th of December, 2019
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. WM0501385
D E Q X North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 1 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NoaTr+caaouru �
+\ r 919.791.4200

Wake Stone Corporation
www.wakestonecorp.com
Quarry Phone Numbers: Locations:
919/266-9266 - Knightdale 6811 Knightdale Blvd., Knightdale, N.C.
919/677-0050 - Triangle 222 Star Lane, Cary, N.C.
919/775-7349 - Moncure 9725 Stone Quarry Rd., Moncure, N.C.
252/985-4411 - Nash County 7379 North Halifax Rd., Battleboro, N.C.
843/756-3400 - N. Myrtle Beach 3990 Hwy 9 Business East, Loris, S.C.
December 30, 2019
By Hand Delivery
Brion Byers
NC Division of Water Resources — Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
RE: Wake Stone Corporation Triangle Quarry Expansion Project
Application for Construction of Monitoring Well System
Mr. Byers:
Business Office Address:
P.O. Box 190
6821 Knightdale Blvd.
Knightdale, N.C. 27545
919/266-1100
Fax: [phone]
Please find attached our application for the installation of 5 Monitoring Wells on our Triangle
Quarry expansion project. The purpose of the wells is to establish the currently existing crystalline rock
aquifer groundwater surface elevation. The wells are to be located on lease -held property owned by
Raleigh Durham International Airport (105 acre "Oddfellows Tract") north of 1-40, east of Old Reedy
Creek Road and west of Crabtree Creek adjacent our currently operating Triangle Quarry. As detailed in
the application materials, these proposed wells will be constructed by installing 4" ID galvanized casing
through the overburden (soil and decomposed bedrock) into sound/unweathered bedrock. The casings
will be grouted in place from the sound bedrock surface to land surface utilizing neat cement grout
place by tremie pipe. The open borehole portion of each well will be advanced to final depth via
diamond core drilling for rock quality assessment.
Pursuant to the "Additional Information" section of the application form, there are no known
sources of potential groundwater contamination located on the subject property. A single family
residential well and septic system (Dunn residence) is located at the northwest corner of the property.
This well and septic system is located within 500' of two of the proposed monitoring wells. Information
on this domestic well and septic system has been obtained from Wake County Environmental Services
and is appended to the well construction application for your review.

Mr. Brion Byers
December 30, 2019
Page 2
We anticipate mobilization of the well drilling contractor (Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC) on or
about January 13, 2020. As such, we would appreciate your assistance in processing the well
construction permit application in as timely a manner as possible. Thank you for your assistance in this
matter. I may be reached at 919-266-1100 should questions arise during your processing of the
application.
Sincerely,
Wake Stone Corporation
David-F. Lee
Geologist/Environmental Supervisor
Attachment: as noted above

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MONITORING OR RECOVERY WELL SYSTEM
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, General Statutes of North Carolina and regulations pursuant thereto,
application is hereby made for a permit to construct monitoring or recovery wells.
1. Date: ��A.// g_04�
2. County: Vv��
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PERMIT NO. ISSUED DATE
3. What type of well are you applying for? (monitoring or recovery):
4. Applicant: WA 1 `6 o �a Telephone:
Applicant's Mailing Address: PO Bow ` ICI e_1H,-T0
Applicant's Email Address (if available): C�AV W9ym ,�, 6,1 40 0, U xv
5. Contact Person (if different than Applicant): Day i j 1' o L N Telephone: t �4tl
Contact Person's Mailing Address: P® BO)g NO
Contact Person's Email Address (if available): ,:
6. Property Owner (if different than Appicant): �V� Telephone:
Property Owner's Mailing Address: P►-y
Property Owner's Email Address (if available):
7. Property Physical Address (Including PIN Number) ��,,//
City County V AVLF� Zip Code
8. Reason for Well(s): ftAn& 690ogy?p of ` C�, ,,p kj
(ex: non -discharge permit requirements, suspected contamination, assessment, groundwater contamination, remediation, etc.)
9. Type of facility or site for which the well(s) is(are) needed: eV6kAVVV -y Irf
(ex: non -discharge facility, waste disposal site, landfill, UST, etc.)
10. Are there any current water quality permits or incidents associated with this facility or site? If so, list permit and/or incident no(s).
11. Type of contaminants being monitored or recovered:
(ex: organics, nutrients, heavy metals, etc.)
12. Are there any existing wells associated with the proposed well(s)? If yes, how many? �C
Existing Monitoring or Recovery Well Construction Permit No(s).: �J /A
13. Distance from proposed well(s) to nearest known waste or pollution source (in feet): 00 o r-/ 1jo o
14. Are there any water supply wells located less than 500 feet from the proposed well(s)? AL S (5FE� Ee,p IRS*•
If yes, give distance(s): f� E rt-CS`TV, VXW, �60
i AA PO4 -D PO
15. Well Contractor. OA Q/F 1�� i% -i , "Certification No.:
Well Contractor Address: i � Z (A�kXQC1 V®. QL t 0 2,nve6(I
PROPOSED WELL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
1. As required by 15A NCAC 02C .0105(f)(7), attach a well construction diagram of each well showing the following:
a. Borehole and well diameter e. Type of casing material and thickness
b. Estimated well depth f. Grout horizons
C. Screen intervals g. Well head completion details
d. Sand/gravel pack intervals
Continued on Reverse

PROPOSED WELL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (Continued)
2. Number of wells to jVe constructed in unconsolidated 5. Hoy will the well(s) be secured?
material: 42 15T&GE Loe,14tw& �R
to e—p04 rre B n
3. Number of wells to be constructed in bedrock: Ce 6. Estimated beginning construction date: (`
4. Total Number of wells to be constructed: 7. Estimated construction completion date:
(add answers from 2 and 3)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. As required by 15A NCAC 02C .0105(f)(5), attach a scaled map of the site showing the locations of the following:
a. All property boundaries, at least one of which is referenced to a minimum of two landmarks such as identified roads,
intersections, streams, or lakes within 500 feet of the proposed well or well system.
b. All existing wells, identified by type of use, within 500 feet of the proposed well or well system.
C. The proposed well or well system.
d. Any test borings within 500 feet of proposed well or well system.
e. All sources of known or potential groundwater contamination (such as septic tank systems, pesticide, chemical or fuel
storage areas, animal feedlots as defined in G.S. 143-215.1013(5), landfills, or other waste disposal areas) within 500 feet
of the proposed well or well system.
SIGNATURES
The Applicant hereby agrees that the proposed well(s) will be constructed in accordance with approved specifications and conditions of
this Well Construction Permit as regulated under the Well Construction Standards (Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
Subchapter 2C) and accepts full responsibility for compliance with these rules
fit/ �if% �!E �iPJ�tJE t�� L'7EOLDUtST �X/t�6 • AaN
Sign t re of A li or *Agent t Title of Appli ant or *Agent
ZWI D /r.- L E.6_ * if signing as Agent, attach authorization agreement stating
Printed name of Applicant or *Agent that you have the authority to act as the Agent.
If the property is owned by someone other than the applicant, the property owner hereby consents to allow the applicant to construct
wells as outlined in this Well Construction Permit application and that it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the
well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards (Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2C).
[_ .-, -0 r,'A
Signature of Prope er (if different than Applicant) Printed name of Property Owner (if different than Applicant)
PjLest0&"T :�6eo- 9_gtA..4A
DIRECTIONS
Please send the completed application to the appropriate Division of Water Resources' Regional Office:
Asheville Regional Office
Raleigh Regional Office
Wilmington Regional Office
2090 U.S. Highway 70
3800 Barrett Drive
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Raleigh, NC 27609
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
4R Rev. 3-1-2016

pUll 0767324317
:.state 0102676
ID
MaP [,game 0767 03
RALEIGH,DURHAM
INTERNATIONAL
Po BOX 80001
Addrr-,,ss I
RALEIGH NC 27623-0001
Zoom to

• ow-3
•OW-t
• oat. .
• OW- Z
m
4
W
POW -1 I,' PROS"CP
1:58,3CaVAI-IOA J V✓ a

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commercial
❑ Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
El Aquifer Recharge
El Aquifer Storage and Recovery
El Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
El Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cool
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Wells > 100,000 GPD
❑Groundwater Remediation
El Salinity Barrier
❑ Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
El Other (explain under #21 1
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/01 /2020 Well ID# OW-1
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA
Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake
0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8420 N N 78.7748 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): IlPermanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or I!nNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this farm.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 94 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 48.46' (02/19/2020)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
rt.
rt.
ft.
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0 r1.
94 ft•
4 in
0.238
Gal. Steel
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
ft.
in.
rt
rt
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
rt
ft.
in.
ft.
ft,
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
94 ft.
Neat Cement
Poured
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
rt.
rt.
rt.
rt.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soilfrock type, grain size, etc.)
0 IL
4 rL
Red clay
4 It.
74 rL
Tan/Brown silt (sap. rock)
74 ft•
84 ft'
PWR - green/brown soft rock
84 rt.
94 rt.
Rock - dark green - fractured
rt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
rt.
ft.
21. REMARKS
well was NQ diamond cored from 94' to 387.1' by another drilling contractor
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-3449
22. Certification:
2/1 /2020
Signature of Certified Well C tractor
Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (NC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-1
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commercial
❑ Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
El Aquifer Recharge
El Aquifer Storage and Recovery
El Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
El Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cool
4. Date Well(s) Completed:
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Wells > 100,000 GPD
❑Groundwater Remediation
El Salinity Barrier
❑ Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
El Other (explain under #21 1
1 /29/2020 Well ID# OW-2
Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake
0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8406 N N 78.7747 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): IlPermanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or I!nNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this farm.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 86 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 66.51 (02/19/2020) (ft.)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
rt.
rt.
ft.
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER F
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0 rt•
86 ft-4
in
0.238
Gal. Steel
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
ft.
in.
ft
ft
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft
ft.
in.
ft.
ft,
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft'
86 ft-
Neat Cement
Poured
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
rt.
rt.
rt.
rt.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soilfrock type, grain size, etc.)
0 rL
2 rL
Red clay
2 rL
63 ft-
Tan/Brown/Green silt - sap. rock
63 ft'
85 It.
Fractured PWR
85 rt•
86 rt•
Sound dark green rock.
rt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
rt.
ft.
21. REMARKS
well was NQ diamond cored from 86' to 369.7' by another drilling contractor
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-3449
22. Certification:
1 /29/2020
Signature of Certified Well ( ntractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (NC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commercial
❑ Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
El Aquifer Recharge
El Aquifer Storage and Recovery
El Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
El Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cool
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Wells > 100,000 GPD
❑Groundwater Remediation
El Salinity Barrier
❑ Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
El Other (explain under #21 1
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/05/2020 Well ID# OW-3
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA
Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake
0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8420 N N 78.7782 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): IlPermanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or I!nNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this farm.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 71 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 37.53' (02/19/2020)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
rt.
rt.
ft.
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0 rt•
t i rt•
4 i"
0.238
Gal. Steel
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
ft.
in.
ft
ft
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft
ft.
in.
ft.
ft,
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
71 ft•
Neat Cement
Poured
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
rt.
rt.
rt.
rt.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soilfrock type, grain size, etc.)
0 rL
3 rt.
Red clay
3 rt.
36 ft-
Orange/tan silt - soft sap. rock
36 rt•
43 rt'
Tan/Brown/Green silt - PWR - sap. rock
43 rt
63 rt
Same - fractured
63 rt•
71 rt•
Fractured sound dark green rock.
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
21. REMARKS
well was NQ diamond cored from 71' to 237.2' by another drilling contractor
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-3449
22. Certification!!:
t 2/5/2020
Signature of Certified Well C tractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (NC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commercial
❑ Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
El Aquifer Recharge
El Aquifer Storage and Recovery
El Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
El Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cool
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Wells > 100,000 GPD
❑Groundwater Remediation
El Salinity Barrier
❑ Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
El Other (explain under #21 1
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/03/2020 Well ID# OW-4
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA
Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake
0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8411 N N 78.7796 W W
6. Is(are) the well(s): IlPermanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or I!nNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this farm.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
9. Total well depth below land surface: 63 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 51.44 (02/19/2020)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
rt.
rt.
ft.
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER F
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0 rt•
63 ft•
4 in
0.238
Gal. Steel
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
ft.
in.
ft
ft
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft
ft.
in.
ft.
ft,
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
63 ft.
Neat Cement
Poured
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
rt.
rt.
rt.
rt.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soilfrock type, grain size, etc.)
0 rL
12 rL
Red clay
12 ft•
50 ft•
Brown silt
50 ft.
59 rL
PWR
59 rt•
63 rt•
Rock - dark green.
rt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
rt.
ft.
21. REMARKS
well was NQ diamond cored from 63' to 236.1' by another drilling contractor
contact person for additional information is David Lee 919-369-3449
22. Certification:
2/3/2020
Signature of Certified Well Contract r
Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (NC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)
For Internal Use Only:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Keith Speece
Well Contractor Name
2856
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #: WM0501385
List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commercial
❑ Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
El Aquifer Recharge
El Aquifer Storage and Recovery
El Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
El Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cool
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑ Wells > 100,000 GPD
❑Groundwater Remediation
El Salinity Barrier
❑ Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
El Other (explain under #21 1
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 02/04/2020 WeII ID# PMW-1
5a. Well Location:
RDU AA
Odd Fellows Tract
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Old Reedy Creek Rd., Cary, NC
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Wake
0767324317
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.8428 N 78.7779 W
6. Is(are) the well(s): IlPermanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or I!nNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this farm.
8. For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed -Loop Geothermal Wells having the same
construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wells
9. Total well depth below land surface: Casing: 94, Open: 263 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 51.20' (02/19/2020) (ft.)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6.5" & 4" (in.)
12. Well construction method: Air Rotary Percussion
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
rt.
rt.
ft.
ft.
15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
0 ft•
94 ft-4
in
0.238"
Gal. Steel
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING(geothermal closed -loop)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft.
ft.
in.
rt
rt
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
rt
ft.
in.
ft.
ft,
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
94 ft.
Neat Cement
Poured
ft.
ft.
rt.
rt.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
rt.
rt.
rt.
rt.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soilfrock type, grain size, etc.)
0 ft.
10 rL
Red clay
10 ft-
70 rL
Brown silt
70 ft•
85 ft•
Fractured PWR
85 rt.
94 rt.
Rock - dark green volcanic rock.
94 ft-
263 ft-
Rock - dark green volcanic rock.
ft.
ft.
rt.
ft.
21. REMARKS
94-263' Open bedrock borehole by 4" air rotary percussion.
22. Certification:
2/4/2020
Signature of Certified Well Contl9ctor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy
of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well construction info
(add 'See Over' in Remarks Box). You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
24. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this GW-1 within 30 days of well completion per the following:
24a. For All Wells: Original form to Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Information Processing Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: Copy to DWR, Underground Injection Control (NC)
Program, 1636 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply and Open -Loop Geothermal Return Wells: Copy to the
county environmental health department of the county where installed
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 24d. For Water Wells producing over 100,000 GPD: Copy to DWR, CCPCUA
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: Permit Program, 1611 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018

USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01286 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Cary
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Attn: Bob Zarzecki
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Size (acres) —105 Nearest Town Cary
Nearest Waterway Crabtree Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates 35.841639,-78.774819
Location description: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary,
Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area within the line labeled "PL" on the
attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and
reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. Therefore this
preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including
wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

SAW-2019-01286
® The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by
the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 1/15/2020. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David E. Bailey at [phone] X 30 or
David.E.Bailev2 Ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Approved Jurisdictional Determination forms dated 01/15/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 03/15/2020.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
� Date: 2020.01.1514:32:34
Corps Regulatory Official:-05'00'
Date of JD: O1/15/2020 Expiration Date of JD: 1/14/2025
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located athlt2://colpsmgpu.usace.gM.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Michael Landguth, Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority, 1000 Trade Dr. PO Box 80001, RDU Airport, NC 27623
Stephanie Goss, NCDEQ-DWR, 3800 Barrett Dr, Raleigh, NC 27609

Panel 5
Gf�
Giro ,'��"r rTafPy
rdrPAy k . 9
ky 550 �r
R
.r.^.MMM.Yw.I
".wrdF..w►�iwl yyM.MM4r•�EI[fy1i1R
•Jf ms1
. � �Nj1VI1f IIIIIlIIIry!!
oF�55i4 C�
•_-1.
SEAL
L-3245
+�
c at.'w.tiawww..r.nwrwir�.sr��.x •r IM�Ywa.
5uRv���4r�i
° '�^' I.r... �
Als�n�► Sina
Panel9
� �
�
.w.oelr..rerlr.-
`
...y Date:2020.5-
a... 111512020ry P­+s.
R
}ones Surveying and Cw wItm PLI.0
Plat of
Waters of the us survey for
for
-'
Wake Stone Corporation

Vicinity Map
NA
✓- r
of Raleigh Durham
oaf
p n�.
Iz
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
,Pam
Panel 4
D 100' ROO' Boo'
Graphic Scale 1 " = 100'
Jones Sury virigandconsultin&PtLl:
I LR�n yll Jp u. ft5 JL-3iASf
Plat of
Waters of the u5 Survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

of Raleigh !Durham International Airport
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
Panel 2
.eh L
Panel 5
—t f
Property of the State North
-
of Carolina
William B. Umstead
State Par.
I
r L
�
rrr�rrwwwnaw �
j'
wvms Roma rnw,a
Jw
a Mrw
AMnm�6i
o.ar«arn dMlk
lml �H na
Oe.R dlwre
�V1r•ryxa�l,�
n.weow dYii
>� w�c61 ]��
fi.3 ranew.nr,d
_1It�
�yy�:
OnEesra� d
106 rilwl[f
w N'w.iNuxu�
�
A
rar
ww«c,.esf erw
foW rillrin ss1m�
m �aesai menm.s
rIa YwuwM
na n.r
/
aru.. o... re,r
wow rm.r >aepssr
r� rw.r,wr..r.,.
9vrn.om K
1011 ]irCii NeraaO
NVHwM
��'
pond Wetland Fringe
na..r rre
MA ?WK
wsrsn> ova
. trnrvwr
❑. 143 AC. +/-
.mxw
aO�M rw�reed Mr
w x> xir,
]mra ]aBEa IDirsa
.c,e �.n rw�,..W
Olt
w
0 f00' 200' 300'
Graphic Scale 1 " = 100'
N Lr, m
":Dnd Wetland Frin
1, 143 Ac. +/
m
lanes Surverng and Consulting, PLLC
r ftn ll ]e . pts It-37 j
plat of
Waters of the US Survey For
for
Wake Stone Corporation

Pond Wetland Fringe
1lti�f
nd Fringe
I •
Pond Wetland Fringe
0.143 Ac. +/-
Stream 6
245 Linear Feet/ e
0.022 Ac. +/-
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
stream 1
'_
aal
114
NeM
M1666.1
4ual I
20690II. 51-13�
aWl an
S noel
ma. WI4M
1115
7-9
206!%3.B S1-23
Strtam l cente,c.—,
1116
)61650.6
EOfi®Y.LS 5134
Strea ]center channel
4
SI-4S
NrtamlQn[ertbnnel
11B
.15W.S
11 S1-55
StrcamlQ ,
5
)615663
2068 ea.e SI6B
Svea 1Qnte,CM1annel
B
11AI
)6153).1
2060pSB.4 SI)b
Nrtam lcenter CM1annel
6
Stream 1
303 Linear Feet/
Pond/Open Water 1 0.027 Ac. +/-
ti 1MAc.
auh
� 6lream 6
IWn INFxtl selptlon WI.- an.�5 2 206em9.2.a m6cente,0unnelmsaue. s6a3 msceme.cxaaael0NMS&S4 SImam6Rme,channela69146 5663 ter—nnel
zO68151.3 56)3N 2lI661"n.9 S69) llm 20re219.3 694Snea 6Cenre; Cha]lm(GB23z.2 S 104 Stream6QnterCM1annel 4
EM
.N ...
etl d 2
Wwl3 Ww3.14r
Pa el
"`.— 3Wala�lw
—A
3..
Panel 5
0
too' 200,
3100'
Graphic
Scale 1 "
= 100'
C
Jones Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
L. Randall Jones, PLS (L-3245)
Plat of
Waters of the US Survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

l 1
eh
Panel 4
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
Stream 4
435 Linear Feel
0.039 At- +/.
Stream 4A
v 20 Linear Feety
0.001 AC. +/-
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
fir: Panel4Afateh Line
Panel 7
U too, 200' Sao'
Graphic Scale 1 " = 100'
5t am5
50 Linear Feet/
o. 3 Ac.
Jones Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
wnd cones_PLS lL32/5!
Plat of
Waters of the US Survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

�r
-zr - F Ln
M
a a
am 5
Linear Feet/
3 Ar. *1-
Panel z
Panel 5
a
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
0 100' Poo' Soo'
Graphic Scale 1 " = 100'
Panel 5
A Lip
Panel 8
Now
�F;531t—'^iT
iEi11
maR3F�F�J�+sTr
"��''r..ifiFiti
�C�'IDF]tffi�itFlil
Stream 2
252 Linear Feet/
0.019 A[. +1-
ilk
aj a
M C
a a
t I
lanes Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
L ifanaNl lone. PLS ll-taesl
Plat of
Waters of the US5urvey for
for
Wake 5tone Corporation
lanes Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
L ifanaNl lone. PLS ll-taesl
Plat of
Waters of the US5urvey for
for
Wake 5tone Corporation

Feed
ti
C
f'[3
sai�c�a�e3�
e�sGol��'ti'
Qsopti��e�
Lo
aoel,3.
Panel
I, L. RAN DAL L ION ES, PLS certify that this project was completed under my direct and responsible
charge from an actual survey made by me; that the boundaries not surveyed are drawn from Wake
County GI5; that the ratio of precision of the positional accuracy is sub -meter, and that this map meets
the requirements of The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56.1600).
This _ day of A -kf-.l s ,, . 2019,
A CAR'..
SEALCr
��
vSEAL
���L��
L. Randall Jones = 't-3F45 _
co $
NC Professional Land Surveyor (L 3245)a-3Uy�a
Notes:
lj
Waters of the U5 (WoUS) including wetlands, streams, and open waters (pond)shown on this
map were delineated by Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC), 8412 Falls of Neuse
Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, N.C. 27615 and field verified by Ross Sullivan of the US Army Corps of
Engineers on August 21, 2019.
2)
NC State Plane coordinates shown hereon are referenced horixantaliyto the North American
Datum of 1983 using the 2011 Adjustment (NAD8312011).
3)
This is a wetlands and US Regulated Waters Survey referenced to the property lines taken from
Wake County GI5 Data.
4)
This 5urvey meets the horizontal a ccu racy standards for a Class B LIS/GIS SURVEY (sub -meter) as
set forth by the NC Board For Engineers and Land Surveyors in 21 NCAC 56,1609.
5)
Field survey was conducted using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLASS) on July 8, 2019
using a Trimble GEO 7X (sn 5737479817) with external zephyr 1.1/1.2 Antenna (sn 31211179921)
and post processed in reference to the closest three (3) CORS Stations (NCR0, DURH, NC)L) with
Panel 6
Trimble Pathfinder Office software (versio n 5, 90).
T gie 6)
Several Existing Iron Pipes (EIP) (property comers) were also located along Crabtree Creek at the
Panel 9
time of survey and plotted on this map.
o too' 200, 300,
Graphic Scale 9 " = 100'
J Jones Surveyina and Consulting, PLLC
L ftFWAV l .- PO (L-9345)
Plat of
Waters of [he US survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

o ron' zoo' soo'
Graphic Scale 7 " = 7 04'
Jones Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
L Nan,411 mess, P6 I1•3245)
Prat of
Waters of the US Survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

Qj
C
S'6 tt3
IM
=��
0��
ny.rwr�
Wetland 1
�� ❑.D91 AC. '�-
,10
xasae
x�9
]n
nwo.
xen].t
Sn
xwac
�
w. arr
3
T0i
ax�L,na dir
sx
Tnsese anfex�
T0i
wn
[mf dw
re.s
>b
xurf LliSN.1
,�.
W
afxlS] s i.,
mi
p...T dine
fa
xwt ]o�i.T
So.
T d
orfi dlnk
ui
s
dick
.1
roi
aat r,i
a
Tq
r.eR.r o..f dir
ffif111S
fp
rbl,re [n.rk der
liffli] x VTYt
Tflf
Orf der
fa
xuff] zfe]nf
Toi
d
xe
xmt.t afleT3a
toi
d
vo
]resrss
diW
TS]
1
6fek duw
T3a
tV
rp
Pak drr
T
rp
hMa Cna d1r
f 10i
Ora dew
1f11fSi
]f16MBe 10f
r.w
1A
ei1]6T1
aMe]!e.] lOP
dens
xvTt1
itN2li ma
S1i
x,ee.i
aatr!'xe
Ie]
x]viT
a]w
P11k dIW
N,
T6,oua
aE¢.i 11x
g1kT dif•k
r
Tessoe
T(x
Gr1k dLs
4'1rf d4,!
]rPOa]
]IWOO Tpi
Oaf dW
>e
]aosii
Tifmle rn
ro.a rear
rcT,oat
rai
r r1w
Property of Wake 5tone Corporation
Wake County Registry gook of Maps 1982, Page 364
^
Panel 5
eh Li
Panel
['n 6trie Creek
wateriurf ce Area 3MAaws+j-
teng1h along CentPfll"e/Pmpp titre 6,Zl3feet
00
Property of Raleigh Durham International Airport
Q.Y
C
�
Cp
fQ
0
too'
200'
300'
Graphic
Scale
T "
= 100'
Jones Surveying and Cansuking, PLLC
L. RrMall ]ene], M R•32451
Plat of
Waters of the US Survey for
For
Wake Stone Corporation

00
0J
01
�
C
r6
ftS
Panel 5
6teh Li
Panel 9
Property of Wake Stone Corporation
Wake County Registry Book of Maps 1982, Page 364
200'
Graphical Scale
and post processed In reference to the closest three (3) CORS Stations (NCRD, DURH, NCJL) with
Trimble Pathfinder Office software (version5.90).
6) Several Existing Iron Pipes (EIP) (property corners) were also located along Crabtree Creek at the
time of survey and plotted on this map.
"This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of the Section
404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing
the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328 and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Date: 2020.01.15 14:32:03
Regulatory Official:] -05'00'
Title: Regulatory Project Manager
Dare: 1/15/2020
LISACEAction 10 No.: SAW-2019-01286
0 100' 200' S00'
Graphic ,Scale 1 's = 100'
Jones Surveying and Consulting, PLLC
L. Randall Jones, PLS (L-3245)
607 Second Avenue KNIGHTDALE, N. C. 27545
Plat of
Waters of the US Survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation
Sheet 1 of 10
Date of Survey: Jufy $, 2019
Jones Survo rig and Consu@iM PtLC
L. Randall b M PLS IL-1 45
Plat of
Waters oft he US survey for
for
Wake Stone Corporation

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA, Attn: Bob Zarzecki I File Number: SAW-2019-01286 I Date: 01/15/2020
Attached
is:
See Section below
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
A
RED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
B
DENIAL
LAPPROVED
C
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
INARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.q=.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ugulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David E. Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

AJD Form 1 - Streams 5 and 6
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): January 15, 2020
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wake Stone Corp RDU 105 Acre Property/Wake
Stone Corporation/Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Cary NC/Wake County, SAW-2019-01286
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the
east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area
within the line labeled "PL" on the attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8416387187234°N, Long.-78.7748193820444' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 700966.44 3968669.84
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse, 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/21/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 748 linear feet, 4 wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION HI: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.L; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through FIRPM tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM' (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ sediment sorting
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:

-5-
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Streams 5 and 6 occur in natural valleys, and display strong bed and banks and several
indicators of ordinary high water marks. Both streams are deeply entrenched in their respective valleys and intercept
groundwater year-round during normal rainfall years. Both streams were determined to have perennial flow by the
consultant (S&EC).
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 748 linear feet 4 wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
'See Footnote # 3.

-6-
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.13.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (S&EC)
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit RUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Cary
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map (no date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
This form documents Stream 5 and Stream 6 (perennial RPWs).

AJD Form 2 - Stream 2
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): January 15, 2020
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wake Stone Corp RDU 105 Acre Property/Wake
Stone Corporation/Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Cary NC/Wake County, SAW-2019-01286
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the
east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area
within the line labeled "PL" on the attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8416387187234°N, Long.-78.7748193820444' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 700966.44 3968669.84
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse, 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/21/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 252 linear feet, 3 wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION HI: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 92,971 acres
Drainage area: 12 acres
Average annual rainfall: 46 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 9 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: Stream 2 (UT to Crabtree Creek; seasonal RPW) to Crabtree Creek (RPW) to Neuse
Rive (TNW)
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stable
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: few
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 6-10
Describe flow regime: Flow during the low evapotrnaspiration period of the year (typically December through
April)
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics: Confined to stream banks
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known: unknown
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): mixed pine -hardwood; 200 ft.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Seasonal water source for typical wildland-urban interface species.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berrn/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

-5-
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream 2 occurs in a natural valley, and displays bed and banks and indicators of ordinary high water
marks (see Section III.B.L(ii)(c)).
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 252 linear feet 3 wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
'See Footnote # 3.

-6-
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.13.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (S&EC)
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit RUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Cary
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map (no date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
This form documents Stream2 (seasonal RPW).

AJD Form 3 - Streams 4 and 4a
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): January 15, 2020
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wake Stone Corp RDU 105 Acre Property/Wake
Stone Corporation/Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Cary NC/Wake County, SAW-2019-01286
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the
east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area
within the line labeled "PL" on the attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8416387187234°N, Long.-78.7748193820444' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 700966.44 3968669.84
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse, 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/21/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 455 linear feet, 2-4 wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION HI: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 92,971 acres
Drainage area: 3 acres
Average annual rainfall: 46 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 4 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Stream 4a (UT to Crabtree Creek; seasonal RPW) to Stream 4 (UT to Crabtree
Creek; RPW) to Crabtree Creek (RPW) to Neuse Rive (TNW)
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st
^ Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stable
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: few
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 6-10
Describe flow regime: Flow during the low evapotrnaspiration period of the year (typically December through
April)
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics: Confined to stream banks
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known: unknown
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): mixed pine -hardwood; 150 ft.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Seasonal water source for typical wildland-urban interface species.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berrn/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

-5-
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream 4 occurs in a natural valley, and display strong bed and banks and several indicators of
ordinary high water marks. This stream is deeply entrenched in its respective valleys and intercepts groundwater
year-round during normal rainfall years. The stream was determined to have perennial flow by the consultant
(S&EC).
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream 4a occurs in a natural valley, and displays bed and banks and indicators of ordinary high water
marks (see Section III.B.1.(ii)(c)).
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 455 linear feet 2-4 wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:

-6-
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (S&EC)
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Cary
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map (no date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
This form documents Stream 4 (perennial RPW) and Stream 4a (seasonal RPW).

AJD Form 4 - Streaml, Pond 1, and
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM Pond Wetland Fringe
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): January 15, 2020
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wake Stone Corp RDU 105 Acre Property/Wake
Stone Corporation/Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Cary NC/Wake County, SAW-2019-01286
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the
east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area
within the line labeled "PL" on the attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8416387187234°N, Long.-78.7748193820444' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 700966.44 3968669.84
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse, 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/21/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 303 linear feet, 4 wide, and/or 1.58 acres.
Wetlands: 0.143 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 92,971 acres
Drainage area: 79 acres
Average annual rainfall: 46 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 9 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: Stream 1 (UT to Crabtree Creek; seasonal RPW) to Crabtree Creek (RPW) to Neuse
Rive (TNW)
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
® Artificial (man-made). Explain: Man-made spillway eroded down to bedrock over many
decades. Natural drainageway connection to Crabtree Creek was cut off when erathen
berm dam was constructed.
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Unstable; man-made spillway eroded
down to bedrock
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: few
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 6-10
Describe flow regime: Flow during the low evapotrnaspiration period of the year (typically December through
April)
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics: Confined to stream banks
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
Identify specific pollutants, if known: unknown
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): mixed pine -hardwood; 150 ft.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Seasonal water source for typical wildland-urban interface species.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.143 acres
Wetland type. Explain: PEM
Wetland quality. Explain: medium -high
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain: Flow during/following precipitation events.
Surface flow is: Overland sheetflow
Characteristics: Sheet flow from wetland to Stream 1 and Pond 1 during/following precipitation events
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Unknown
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): Wetland is within 50 buffer of Stream 1 and Pond 1
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: 100 ; herbaceous veg including Juncus effuses and Typha latifolia.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Year-round cover and food source for common wildland-urban
interface species.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 1
Approximately 0.143 acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:

-5-
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Y 0.143
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: This wetland and others in similar
landscape positions receive preciptation-derived- and ground- water from surrounding land and occasional flooding
from abutting impoundment, retain and slowly release water, physically trap and retain sediment, allow
biogeochemical anaerobic processes (i.e. denitrification) to occur to improve water quality, and serve as
groundwater recharge areas. These wetlands serve as year-round cover and food source for a variety of typical
wildland-urban interface wildlife species.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream 1 occurs in a natural valley, and displays bed and banks and indicators of ordinary high water
marks (see Section IILB.L(ii)(c)).

-6-
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 303 linear feet 4 wide.
® Other non -wetland waters: 1.58 acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: Pond 1 is an impoundment of Streaml. Pond 1 is formed by a man-made earthen berm
dam, and Stream 1 flows through a man-made spillway out of the eastern side of the dam.
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Pond Wetland Fringe is a wetland along the edges of Stream 1 and Pond 1. This wetland
extends all the way to the banks of Stream 1 and Pond 1.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.143 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
® Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):'"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (S&EC)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Cary
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map (no date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
This form documents Streaml (seasonal RPW), Pond 1 (Impoundment of Stream 1), and Pond Wetland Fringe (wetland abutting
seasonal RPW).

-8-
Pond 1 is an impoundment of Streaml. Pond 1 is formed by a man-made earthen berm dam, and Stream 1 flows through a man-
made spillway out of the eastern side of the dam.

AJD Form 5 - Crabtree Creek,
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM Wetland 1, and Wetland 2
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): January 15, 2020
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wake Stone Corp RDU 105 Acre Property/Wake
Stone Corporation/Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Cary NC/Wake County, SAW-2019-01286
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located on the north side of I-40 and the
east side of Old Reedy Creek Road in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. PIN: 0767324317. The project area is limited to the area
within the line labeled "PL" on the attached survey titled "Plat of Waters of the US Survey for Wake Stone Corporation."
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8416387187234°N, Long.-78.7748193820444' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 700966.44 3968669.84
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse, 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/21/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There � "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 6,219 linear feet, 24 wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.142 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.l.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 92,971 acres
Drainage area: 33,752 acres
Average annual rainfall: 46 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 1 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: Crabtree Creek (RPW) to Neuse Rive (TNW)
Tributary stream order, if known: 5th
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
^ Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 24 feet
Average depth: 4 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stable; natural riparian vegetation
along banks and no signs of scour
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Present
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): <1 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Perennial
Estimate average number of flow events in review arealyear: 1
Describe flow regime: Perennial
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics: Confined to stream banks during normal flow and
overbank flooding during high flow
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
® destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® shelving
® the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® scour
® sediment deposition
® multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water typically clear, although well known fo high sediment load during heavy precipitation events.
Classified as a Nutrient Sensitive Water by the NCDEQ.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Sediment, nitrogen
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): mixed pine -hardwood; >300 ft.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Present in pockets
® Habitat for:
® Federally Listed species. Explain findings: Known occurences of Atlantic pigtoe and dwarf wedgemussel within
this watershed
® Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: Stream is of appropriate size and has appropriate habitat for numerous fish
species
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Year-round water source for typical wildland-urban interface
species.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.145 acres
Wetland type. Explain: PFO
Wetland quality. Explain: medium
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain: Flow during/following precipitation events and flooding.
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined
Characteristics: Flow through cut-off channel for Wetland 2, and overland sheet flow from Wetland 1 to
Crabtree Creek during/following precipitation events.
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Wetland 1 is within the Crabtree Creek 100-year floodplain
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
® Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: Wetland 1 is seperated by the natural levee of Crabtree Creek.
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 50 - 100-year floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Unknown
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): Wetlands are within 50' buffer of Crabtree Creek
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: 25-50%; Platanus occidentalis, Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera,
Carpinus caroliniana, Microstegium vimineum, Arundinaria gigantea
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
® Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings: Wetland 1 is a depressional-type wetland that provides
amphibian breeding habitat.
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Year-round cover and food source for common wildland-urban
interface species.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 30 (or more)

-5-
Approximately 585 acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Wetland 2 (Y) 0.51 Wetland 1 (N) 0.091
See attached list of similarly situated wetlands
based on USFWS NWI Mapping along relevant reach
of Crabtree Creek (Crabtree Creek floodplain (Zone AE)
along Stream Order 5)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: This wetland and others in similar
landscape positions receive preciptation-derived- and ground- water from surrounding land and occasional flooding
from adjacent RPWs, retain and slowly release water, physically trap and retain sediment, allow biogeochemical
anaerobic processes (i.e. denitrification) to occur to improve water quality, serve as breeding habitat for amphibian
species, and provide year-round cover, food source, and movement corridors for a variety of typical wildland-urban
interface wildlife species.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section I1I.1): Wetland 2 is hydrologically connected to Crabtree Creek (perennial RPW) as an abutting wetland, and
Wetland 1 is hydrologically connected to Crabtree Creek given its position within a floodplain subject to occasional
flooding. Such wetlands have the capability to capture overland runnoff and floodwaters, retain and slowly release water
and organic carbon downstream, physically trap and retain sediment, and allow biogeochemical anaerobic processes (i.e.
denitrification) to occur to improve water quality. These actions limit sediment and nutrient input into Crabtree Creek,
designated by the NCDEQ as a Nutrient Sensitive Water, which flows directly to the Neuse River within 25 river miles.
Such wetlands also serve as breeding habitat for amphibian species, and provide year-round cover, food source, and
movement corridors for a variety of typical wildland-urban interface wildlife species. As such, Wetlands 1 and 2, and

-6-
similarly situated wetlands, affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of, and have a significant nexus with, the
Neuse River, a TNW.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Crabtree Creek is a named blue -line stream on the USGS topo map, occurs on the Wake Co. Soil
Survey, comprises its own 10-digit HUC (0302020108), and is readily visible on all years of aerial photography. This
stream is known to flow year-round, even in drought years. Crabtree Creek was determined to be perennial by the
consultant.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 6,219 linear feet 24 wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
Wetland 2 occurs within an abandoned stream channel, cut-off by the construction of the earthen berm dam for
Pond 1. This abandoned channel has subsequently silted in and partially vegetated. Wetland 2 extends all the
way to the banks of Crabtree Creek.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.051 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.091 acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
'See Footnote # 3.

-7-
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (S&EC)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-8-
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Cary
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS data download, clipped in ArcGIS for Crabtree Creek floodplain
(Zone AE) along Stream Order 5 section of Crabtree Creek.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: NC Dept. of Emergency Management data download
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map (no date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
This form documents Crabtree Creek (perennial RPW), Wetland 1 (wetland adjacent to perennial RPW) and Wetland 2 (wetland
abutting perennial RPW).

Significant Nexus Analysis - Similarly Situated Wetlands (based on NWI data within relevant reach)
FID
Shape *
ATTRIBUTE
WETLAND_TY
Shape _Area (acre)
1
Polygon
PEM1A
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
0.79017
2
Polygon
PEM1 F
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
2.275261
3
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
8.491559
4
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.356734
5
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
16.480319
6
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
26.589071
7
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.757841
8
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
29.767154
9
Polygon
PFO1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
27.788048
10
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.165045
11
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
5.074249
12
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
6.968374
13
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
8.501524
14
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
5.300227
15
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.215693
16
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.432183
17
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.623431
18
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.44556
19
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
21.795437
20
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
6.460846
21
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
16.486423
22
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.163837
23
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.134964
24
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.386951
25
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
91.396428
26
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
85.440656
27
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
32.595371
28
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
85.970007
29
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
9.929925
30
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.452979
31
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
3.527805
32
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
12.40399
33
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.026185
34
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0.234244
35
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.374376
36
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.160579
37
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.997565
38
Polygon
PFO1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
4.992395
39
Polygon
PFO5F
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
1.047778
40
Polygon
PSS1/4A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
8.302979
41
Polygon
PSS1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
3.085978
42
Polygon
PSS1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
1.285907
43
Polygon
PSS1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
2.376305
44
Polygon
PSS1A
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
8.737129
45
Polygon
PSS1C
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
1.350097
46
Polygon
PUBHh
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
14.076405

Rig-�
R■i;
■..�ee�s�Pea:

NC DWR Neuse River Riparian Buffer Determination

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority
Attn: Michael J. Landguth, President
1000 Trade Drive
P.O. Box 80001
RDU Airport, NC 27623
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 20, 2019
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #19-176
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
F-1 Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (l 5A NCAC 2B .0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s)
Wake Stone Property
Old Reedy Creek Road, Cary, NC; PIN # 0767324317
Crabtree Creek
Determination Date: June 18, 2019 Staff: Stephanie Goss
Stream Feature
E/1/1P
(t)
Not
Subject 0)
Subject
Start @
Stop @
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
Crabtree Creek
P
X
Throu bout
X
X
Pond 1
X
X
X
1: Above Pond 1
P
X
Off Property
Pond I
X
1: Below Pond 1
I
N/A
N/A
Pond I
Crabtree
Creek
2
I
X
DWR Flag
Crabtree Crk.
X
3
E
X
Throu bout
X
4
P
X
DWR Flag
Crabtree Crk.
X
5
P
N/A
N/A
DWR Flag
Crabtree Crk.
6
P
N/A
N/A
Off Property
Crabtree Crk.
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 1 3800 Barrett Drive i Raleigh. North Carolina 27bO9
awe..cdema«�.�r.owm� 919.791.4200

Wake Stone Property
Wake County
June 20, 2019
Page 2 of 2
1) E = Ephemeral, 1 = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NA=Not Applicable
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water
quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Wake County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that are not depicted on the maps referenced above and
are therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject
to all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B,
and may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending
via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested
within sixty (60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should
be directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Stephanie Goss at
[phone].
Sincerely, A�l
-1 1 6 4
Karen Higgins
Supervisor, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Bob Zarzecki via e-mail at Bzarzecki(u)sandec.corn

19-176: Wake Stone Property
WStream I: Subject -Not
depicted on this map Stream 1: Not
depicted on this map
' 4
0 t
Stream 6: Not -
ep d on tMs tl icte map
Stream 5: Not
depicted on this map pond 1: Subject
V1
41,
Stream 2: Subject
Stream 4 Subject t,i'i _
- ' Nat depicted an �, � - Not depicted on
�i ~ r tms map Crabtree Crerk. Subject this map
,a
S o d pi Not Subject
Not depicted on thi3
map
Crabtree Creek: Subject
8� g
E �
Fridges
Ea ke
a
wTF f Af �--► �/ � [ sf
�+STv Map provided by NCDEQ
Legend:
Division of Water Resources
-Approximate Site boundary: . locations are approximate
and are provided for
-2016 USGS Cary, NC Quadrangle reference only

NCDWR Neuse Buffer Impact analysis for bridge

C
O
a
4-
E
L
a
T
NI
C
o°
N+
ON
� N
QY,
�o
Nam=
VICINITY MAP
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
` PROFILE (VERTICAL)
ACCESS ROAD
LOCATION. WAKE COUNTY
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
Prepared in the Office of.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Pkwy
Michael Baker Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518
INTERNATIONAL NCLicense: F-1084
TODD H. BUCKNER, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
1NLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE.

ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
►����iiliili7
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
290
280
270
M
a 240
c
SITE 1
II
II
I
I
J/JI
Ie
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
481727 4
/ \ W SHEET NO.
\ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I \
(�50' 25' 0 50' \ -A00'
\ SCALE: 1"=100'
\ \ DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
\\\ \\\ BUFFER DRAWING
\ SHEET 2 OF 3
_ -g-c
9'L1 Iz \\\
1 10 11 12 13 14 1

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS
BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type CROSSING IMPACT BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
1
12+18-L-
BRIDGE
X
6404
5645
12049
0
TOTALS*:
6404
1 5645
1 12049
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
NOTES:
2018 Feb

Water ResourcesENTAL QUALITY
A. Owner/Applicant Information
For instructions on how to fill out this form, see the Buffer Authorization Application Help Document posted on DWR's 401 & Buffer page.
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
A. Owner/Applicant Information
General Information
Primary Contact Email: *
Is this project a public transportation
project? *
Who is submitting the application?*
1. Property Owner Information:
la. Name on Recorded Deed:*
1b. Responsible Party:
1c. Mailing Address:*
1d. Telephone:* [phone]
[e-mail]
Pease list the contact person's enail for questions or payrrent on this project if needed.
r Yes
r No
W Owner
W Applicant other than Owner
W Agent
Check all that apply
Wake Stone Corporation
Sam Bratton
(for Corporations)
Street Address
6821 Knightdale Blvd., PO Box 190
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Fogion
Knightdale
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27545-0190
United States
le. Email Address:* sambratton@wakestonecorp.c
om
2. Applicant's Information (if different from owner):
2a. Name: * Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority - Michael
Landguth, President & CEO
2b. Company Affiliation: Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority

2c. Mailing Address:* Street Address
1000 Trade Drive
Address Line 2
PO Box 80001
aty
State / Province / Fegion
RDU Airport
NC
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
27623
USA
2d.Telephone:* [phone]
2e. Email Address:* [e-mail]
2f. Attach a signed and dated copy of the authorization granting the applicant owner approval. An agent authorization form is
acceptable.*
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Lessor Certification Authorization - 105 Acre
399.52KB
Property.pdf
FDF only
3. Agent Information:
3a. Name:*
3b. Company Affiliation:*
3c. Mailing Address:*
Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
aty
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Code
27615
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
3d. Telephone:* 9198465900 3e. Email Address:* [e-mail]
3f. Attach a signed and dated copy of the agent authorization form.*
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Wake Stone Triangle Quarry_Agent Authorization
85.23KB
Form.pdf
FDF Only
If the applicant is not the property owner, in addition to providing the Agent's information, select Applicant other than Owner' above, enter the applicant's
information, and attach an authorization granting the applicant owner approval.

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
u
la. Name of Project:* Wake Stone -Triangle Quarry
(Subdivision, facility, or establishment narre)
If your project has a formal name please use this. If your project does not have a formal name, please identify your project by the owner name and
proposed activity (Jones Property Access Road, Smith Guest House, etc.) List in parentheses any other names that have been used to identify the
project in the past.
1b. Is this a publicly -funded transportation project?*
r Yes
r No
1d. Subdivision Name:
le. Nearest Cary
Municipality:
1f. Property Size: 324.00
acres
1g. County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Wake
1h. Property ID# Date of Purchase
0766809143 9/1 /1981
Tax RN or Parcel id
1 i. Deed Information
Type of Book Book#11 Page#
Deed F
3
Map
1j. Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Wake Stone - RDU _ WoUS Plat Map (signed &
6.34MB
sealed).pdf
RDF only
1k. How would you like to provide the Latitude and Longitude information?*
r Address Lookup
r Manually
Latitude * 35.841176 Longitude *-78.772390
11. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes
r No
Coastal Management information can be found at:

About Coastal Management
Staff Listing
Coastal County Lookup
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Crabtree Creek, 27-33-(3.5)
Link to Soil Surveys for North Carolina Counties. (Please see instructions in the Help Document to determine the most recent published version.)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:*
2c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:*
7,977
(linear feet only)
3. Project Description:
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The requested buffer impacts are associated with the construction of a bridge
across Crabtree Creek between the existing Wake Stone Corporation - Triangle
Quarry on the east side to the RDU Airport lease property known as the "Odd
Fellows Tract' on the west side. The existing conditions of the Wake Stone
Corporation property include the active Triangle Quarry (pit, plant, sales yard,
office, water quality ponds, etc.). The existing conditions on the RDU Airport
property include vacant forest land managed under a forest management plan. Both
properties are bordered to the south by Interstate 40 and to the north by Umstead
State Park.
3b. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
USGS Map. pdf 3.58MB
FDF only
Link to TOPO Map lookup: https://viever.nationalmap.gov/basic/
3c. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the
project site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
SS Map.pdf
FDF only
466.86KB
Link to Soil Surveys for North Carolina Counties. (Please see instructions in the Help Document to determine the most recent published version.)
4. Proposed Activity
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose and include the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed activity is to construct a bridge across Crabtree Creek, which will be
100 feet in length with vertical abutments. The proposed Wake Stone bridge will
span the floodplain and will use a concrete retaining wall to build the proposed road
and bridge to grade. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such
as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this
project.
Attach a site plan as applicable to the project:

(lick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
Wake Stone Corp E&SC Plan.pdf 9.72MB
Wake Stone —Permit Package Buffer _20200204.pdf 819.91 KB
Wake Stone Corp E&SC Narrative.pdf 5.06MB
1-WSC Plan Set page 3.pdf 4.44MB
FDF only
** Below is a link with instructions on what you will need to show on your site plan.
http://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/doc/402224/Pagel.aspx
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have jurisdictional wetlands or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
property/project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
5b. Who did the determination on the jurisdictional areas?
Who did the determination? I
List name if known
Date
Attach
State
Stephanie Goss
(Nacre if know n)
12/03/2019
DW.
3
Bu..
Le..
W...
St...
Tr...
Q...
Ha..
Ro..
Ar...
Of only
State
Stephanie Goss
06/20/2019
(i\brreifknown)
W"'
9
St...
RD.
Bu..
Le..
176
(E...
6-
20-
20..
re...
pdf only
Corps
Ross Sullivan / David Bailey
(iNbrre if known)
01/15/2020
20.. 2
01..
AJD
Te..
pdf only

*** Please include the date of the determination and upload a copy of the determination.
Comments:
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes
r No
6b. List any permits/approvals that have been requested or obtained for this project in the past.
Application Date Date Issued Permit Type
LL
1991 NWP 14 and NWP 26
6c. Please explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.*
Previous Nationwide Permit verifications were obtained for the Triangle Quarry in
1991, but known for the area of the proposed bridge over Crabtree Creek and no
previous Neuse Buffer Authorization Certificates (as the buffer rules did not exist in
1991).
The proposed mining permit expansion project and associated bridge will avoid all
jurisdictional WOTUS for the foreseable future. The future pit on the RDU Airport
property may eventually require impacts to WOTUS and Neuse Buffers some time in
the future depending on market demands. Any such impacts would be requested
from the USACE and DWR at that time.
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this project a phased project?* r Yes
r No
7b. If yes, explain*
The new pit on the RDU Airport lease property is designed to avoid all impacts to
WoTUS and Neuse Buffers. However, any additional expansion of the pit in the
future Will most likely require impacts to WoTUS and/or Neuse Buffers. This will be
years from now and dependent on market demands. Wake Stone Corporation will
request and obtain any necessary approvals from the USACE and DWR prior to
conducting any such impacts.
A

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory ^,
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...........
Buffer Impacts
la. Project is in which protected Basin?*
r Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
r Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
r Randleman Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
f Tar -Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
r Jordan Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0267)
r Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0606 & 15A NCAC 0213.0607)
You can find which river basin you live in at the link below.
http://wmw.eenorthearolina.org/riverbasins-gis-map.asp
1c. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
Please note: if the impact you list belowrequires mitigation choose "allow w/ mitigation" under impact type.
Site# - Reason
Stream Name
Buffer Impact*
Impact Type *
Zone 1
Zone 2
Bridge Crossing 1
Crabtree
Permanent
Allowable
6,404.
5,645.
K/hp label (e.g. Finad
Creek
(P)
00
00
Crossing 1)
Perm orTerrp
Square
Square
Feet
Feet
Total Zone 1 Impacts: 6,404.00
Total Zone 2 Impacts: 5,645.00
Total Buffer Impacts: 12,049.00
Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.*
Wake Stone Corporation hired S&EC, PA to delineate and verify all jurisdictional
wetlands, streams, other Waters of the US (WoTUS) and Neuse Buffers on both the
RDU Airport lease property and the existing Triangle Quarry site. Wake Stone
Corporation then used this information to design the pit on the RDU Airport lease
property to avoid all impacts to WoTUS and Neuse Buffers. They then designed the
bridge across Crabtree Creek to avoid impacts to WoTUS and to cross the creek
and Neuse Buffers at a perpendicular angle to minimize impacts to the Neuse
Buffers. Future impacts to the WoTUS and Neuse Buffers will be necessary for
expansion of the pit on the RDU Airport lease property, but these will be years from
now and dependent on market demands. As such these resources can remain in
place until then and of course pending any necessary approvals from both the
USACE and DWR. See attached Wake Stone Corp E&SC Plan"
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. *
Wake Stone Corporation is in the process obtaining an updated Mining Permit for
the Triangle Quarry to include the RDU Airport lease land and bridge. This Mining
Permit will include all required BMP measures to protect downstream water quality.
See attached Wake Stone Corp E&SC Plan & Narrative'

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts & high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented
riparian buffer program, upload a plan that fully documents howdiffuse flowwill be maintained. All stormwater control measures (SCMs) must be
designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
la. What type of SCM are you providing?*
I- Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
r Other SCM that removed minimum of 30% nitrogen
1 c. Diffuse Flow Documentation* click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Wake Stone Corp E&SC Plan.pdf 9.72MB
FDF only

F. Supplementary Information
F. Supplementary Information
Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
r Yes
r No
Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR
Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
r Yes
r No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact buffer authorization application?
r Yes
r No
G. Additional Information
Please upload any additional information you would like the Division to consider during application review.
Additional Attachments: nick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FDF only
Additional Comments:

G. Sign and Submit
G. Sign and Submitt ^
By digitally signing below, I certifythat:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act')
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the application form."
Print Name:* Bob Zarzecki
Signature *
Submission Date: (Auto populated field)

Blasting Analysis Summary

DYNO,
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance-
1
Wake Stone Triangle Quarry
Vibration Analysis Summary
In July of 2019, Dyno Nobel was asked to assist Wake Stone with confidently predicting
seismic vibration levels and air blast at a distance of 500 feet behind the blast site at their
Triangle Quarry. Results from this study should be a reliable indicator of what to expect
when blasting on the adjacent RDU Odd Fellows tract. The modified US Bureau of
Mines (USBM) RI 8507 Alternative Blasting Level Criteria graph (shown below) was
used as the allowable vibration limit for this investigation. This is the same blasting
vibration limit currently in place for all North Carolina quarry NCDEQ mining permits.
10.1
�r
m
w
`c
34
a
y �0
L7
C
e9 1.0
� a_s
0.7
M
0A
� 4,2
�x
0.7
2 �nfgat
i
4.75 inrsrt
F
H
1
i
i
1 3 10 20 ]d
Blast Vibration frequency, Hz
10.0
2.0
1_5
1.0
0.g
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
02
Figure I Altemative blaOng level criteria
(Source modfrred from figure 8-1. Bureau of Mines R? 850
The USBM graph above represents ground vibration data in two axes. The vertical axis
represents Peak Particle Velocity (PPV), which is the peak speed the ground moves
during a blast event and is measured in inches per second of ground movement. The
horizontal axis represents Frequency (Hz), which is the rate at which the vibration wave
from a blast travels through the ground, and is measured in cycles per second. Allowable
PPV on the modified USBM RI 8507 graph varies with the frequency of the ground
vibration. So long as measured vibration remains below the limits shown on the USBM
graph referenced above, no damage to structures will occur.

DYNG
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance -
2
It should be noted that humans are sensitive to ground vibration and can detect levels of
vibration as low as 0.05 in./sec. or lower. Just because vibration can be detected by a
human does not mean damage is taking place on a structure.
Air overpressure represents the energy from a production blast that is propagated as a
pressure wave through the air, and is measured in linear decibels (dBL). This pressure is
measured with a calibrated microphone. A level of 133 dBL Peak Air Pressure using a
2.0 Hz flat -response microphone was used as the allowable limit for this investigation.
This is the same air overpressure limit currently in place for all North Carolina quarry
NCDEQ mining permits.
It should be noted that humans are sensitive to air overpressure and can detect levels of
air overpressure (heard as noise) at very low levels. Just because air overpressure can be
detected by a human does not mean damage is taking place on a structure. Below are
some typical levels of air overpressure for reference:
0 dBL
— Threshold of hearing
20 dBL
— Whisper
40 dBL
— Hospital room
65 dBL
— Ordinary conversation
70 dBL
— Vacuum cleaner
80 dBL
— Alarm clock
90 dBL
— Hair dryer
110 dBL
— Car horn
120 dBL — Overpressure produced by 20 mph wind
133 dBL — Allowable limit of NCDEQ mining permits
150 dBL — Poorly mounted windows break
170 dBL — Most windows break
180 dBL — Structural damage occurs
DynoConsult, a division of Dyno Nobel, started the investigative process by performing a
vibration regression. The purpose of a vibration regression is to develop an equation that
will predict the PPV of a production blast at varying distances from the blast site in a
given geology. Data was collected with seismographs through a series of production
blasts conducted at Wake Stone's Triangle Quarry and provided to DynoConsult. The
graph of the vibration regression is shown below:

DYNO.
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance-
3
Wake Stone - Triangle Quarry Regression
The regression graph above represents data in two axes. The vertical axis is Peak Particle
Velocity (PPV). The horizontal axis is Scaled Distance (S.D.), which is a function of
distance from the blast site and the maximum pounds of explosives per delay period for
the blast. The 95% regression line represents a 95% confidence level that at a given
Scaled Distance value, the recorded maximum PPV will be below this line. Through the
data collected by the seismographs for these blasts, the factors of the expected ground
vibration for this geology were developed to show the slope of the 95% predictive
equation to be -1.426 and the intercept of the 95% predictive equation be 70.435.
The equations for the mean and 95% regression lines are given as:
PPVmean = 33.942(S.D.)-1.426
PPV95% = 70.435(S.D.)-1.426
The full regression analysis and supporting blast reports and seismograph readings are
available upon NCDEQ request.

DYNO.
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance -
The table below shows some of the seismograph data collected from actual production
blasts at the Triangle Quarry used to develop the equations above. The data in the table
shows only the blasts that were monitored with a seismograph at a distance between
400 feet and 500 feet from the blast site. All were within the allowable limits for
vibration:
Blast #
Distance
from
Blast
ft.
L
Channel
PPV
in./sec.
L
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.)
T
Channel
PPV
(in./sec.)
T
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.)
V
Channel
PPV
(in./sec.
V
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.
Air
Overpressure
(dBL)
T-1
500
0.180
45.5
0.200
45.5
0.130
50.0
127
T-2
500
0.828
41.7
0.635
55.6
1.038
50.0
135
T-3
400
0.485
50.0
0.490
55.6
0.335
62.5
129
T-4
400
1.465
83.3
0.705
83.3
0.834
62.5
136
T-5
400
1.328
71.4
1.022
45.5
0.859
55.6
135
T-6
400
1.218
33.3
0.775
71.4
0.963
50.0
135
T-7
450
0.390
62.5
0.395
33.3
0.510
35.7
135
In conjunction with the vibration regression, a `signature hole' analysis (one hole
individually fired to produce a single waveform) was conducted. With the data produced
from the signature hole, a waveform analysis was used to simulate varying blast designs
over a period of eleven additional blasts, T-8 through T-18. During these eleven blasts,
all ground vibration results were well within allowable limits at a distance of 500 feet
from the blast site.
While ground vibration continued to be within allowable limits for these eleven
additional blasts at a distance of 500' from the blast site, the air overpressure for the first
four blasts (T-8 through T-11) was close to or slightly above allowable limits. Changes
in loading practices were then implemented to reduce the air overpressure on blasts T-12
through T-16. This data is represented in the table below (all seismograph readings taken
at a distance of 500 feet from the blast site):

DYNO.
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance-
5
Blast #
Distance
from
Blast
(ft.)
L
Channel
PPV
(in./sec.)
L
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.)
T
Channel
PPV
(in./sec.)
T
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.)
V
Channel
PPV
(in./sec.)
V
Channel
Frequency
(Hz.)
Air
Overpressure
(dBL)
Prior to adjustments to control air overpressure
T-8
500
0.306
55.6
0.345
41.7
0.299
38.5
133
T-9
500
0.215
29.4
0.286
31.3
0.313
62.5
128
T-10
500
0.228
41.7
0.280
41.7
0.371
41.7
134
T-11
500
0.195
26.3
0.215
38.5
0.234
55.6
133
Measures in place to control air overpressure
T-12
500
0.620
41.7
0.488
11.1
0.378
35.7
126
T-13
500
0.183
38.5
0.298
50.0
0.408
62.5
128
T-14
500
0.660
35.7
0.318
50.0
0.725
50.0
125
T-15
500
0.463
14.3
0.453
35.7
0.435
31.3
130
T-16
500
0.280
41.7
0.268
38.5
0.133
50.0
126
Measures removed to control air overpressure
T-17
500
0.339
29.4
0.332
41.7
0.475
62.5
136
T-18
500
0.235
26.3
0.238
33.3
0.198
33.3
135
With changes to loading practices in place for blasts T-12 through T-16, the resulting air
overpressure levels were consistently within allowable limits. Ground vibration
remained well in compliance. After five consecutive blasts demonstrating air
overpressure could be controlled to remain within allowable limits, loading returned to
previous practices for blasts T-17 and T-18 to confirm the changes made on blasts T-12
through T-16 were effective in reducing air overpressure.

DYNO,
Dyno Nobel
Groundbreaking Performance -
In summary, based on the vibration regression developed and the data collected during
this investigation, there is full confidence that compliance within NCDEQ allowable
ground vibration and air overpressure limits can be maintained for structures as close as
500 feet from a given blast site in the Triangle quarry and in similar geology such as
occurs on the RDU Odd Fellows tract.
Best Regards,
Andy Hudson
Area Technical Representative
Dyno Nobel Inc
304 Magnolia St.
Statesville, NC 28677
Office: [phone] Fax: [phone]
mailto: andy.hudsongam.dynonobel.com
http://www.dynonobel.com
Mobile: [phone]