92-02_4_Redacted

HANSGN AGGREGATES EAST
SOUTHEAST REGION
RALEIGH [QUARRY
10501 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA 27507
WAKE COUNTY
PHON E: (919) 556-401 1
MINING PERMIT No: 92-02
RENEWAL
■■■
"'Hanson
NOVEMBER, 2002
noinmr MAP
S14ELY Wom
COVER
OVrLA LL STTL MINlNO PLAN
MP-1
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
EC -I
RECLAMATION PLAN
RP•1
TVP3CAi CROSS SEC'nONS
YI

.
�.
S a
e
4
,44
g ,
g CA T#YRL
^`5
r "T
4 7
r
ra
�•
-
4
{
� a
w
,
e ,
raax
.7 oil
MANSOWN aGGRITS ITS MAMST
REWIEW.:AN
xE riOt
. ..... .q RALEM
. ..... . . .... . ...................... . .... ]��
...................................................................
........................... ...
QP. Get

hn
. . . ... .............. ............................................................. .
. . . ... .............. ............................................................. .
. . . ..........
KANSON AaGkEOA*MS EAST
. .. . .. .....
SOUTHEAtr REGION
P-dA.EKW CLUARRY
. . .........................................
.................................................................................

awrr✓��II�N���fYRNl�r� yae .•". rR.Ks.µ`c emu. �.w
�Il7l
04
- 1
_ � m�a Y•w Y•,tl EiVAT�R�lSYYM1e�
SeCTIm A�A
SCALE 76900
r
ESIsrL*o mugmc ape"Mm
v �
_SECTION C-C
SCALA 1+100
"AMOON ADOROATU EA"
IIOMEKAL 'aDUTMkA i "aloft
j 1 G ;} 4 f• - RALEkGFgIFARRY •i:MwIIfO/I
ZECT1OM iva.na^ •.c iw.. cau.m
r
ILTA

r�L
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining Act
of f 971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws,
rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all
lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE:__January 10. 2M

' I . F • Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this
permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
IG^,1 aI[ l� Fallon of the land and water afiet::teU b}/ the permitted mining operation. his permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive the
expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another operator
succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale,
lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the duties
imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the
permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that both
operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the affected land
and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator
written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a
designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department may institute other
enforcement procedures authorized by law.
IRM- 1E�•Ti1�
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, terms
shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
u u t 15, 1 This permit has been modified to include an additional 105 acres of land (areas
B and C) as indicated in the modification request and aerial photograph received by the Land
Quality Section on November 3, 1989 on which only the construction of the overburden disposal
area shall be conducted as per the revised Grading Plan dated March 1990 and received by the
Land Quality Section on June 20, 1990 with several stipulations.
November 2. 1991 This permit has been modified to allow the on -site remediation of petroleum
contaminated soils as indicated in the information dated September 5, 1991 and in accordance
with the rules and requirements promulgated by the Environmental Management Commission.
November 25,1992; This permit has been modified to allow the expansion of the existing pit and
the construction of the corresponding sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on the
Erosion Control Plan dated March 1992 and revised August 1992.
MU 27. 1994: T his permit has been modified to allow the construction of settling ponds as per
the plans received by the Land Quality Section on April 5, 1994.
April 24,,1995: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Nello L. Teer
Companv to Benchmark Carolina Annrnates
, Inr
may• ..y4...,..

0 0 Page 3
October 17. 1997: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at the site to
176.5 acres as indicated on the mine maps and associated sediment and erosion control plans
dated August 1997. In addition, the modification allows the installation of the primary crusher
station inside the existing pit (including the development of shear walls required for the crusher
relocation), expansion of the pit area, development of a new entrance road and interior access
roads, construction of new visual barrier berms, a new plant and process area, and new
office/scale house, and the installation of related erosion and sedimentation control measures as
specified by the above referenced plans.
May 21, 1999: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc..
August 10, 2001: This permit has been modified to allow the construction of the Borrow
Removal/Sludge Disposal Area as indicated on the mine map dated March 14, 2001 and last
revised June 8, 2001.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until January 10, 2013.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to
the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Envirnnmental Prntartinn Anpnry nnri anfnrrr-pri by the N r Fnvirnnmantal
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact the
Stormwater Section, Division of Water Quality, to secure any necessary stormwater
permits or other approval documents.
2. Air Ouality and Dust Contr
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including fugitive
dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the. Division of Air
Quality.
B. The plant entrance road shall be paved from its junction with Capitol Boulevard (US
1) to the officelscale house. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means
that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted
area.

Page 4
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
VIf�5Vi.onfvr%cdbtheN. C. Environmental �1a.y L—IlII
-B. Sufficient buffer (minimum 100 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity
of the natural watercourse or wetland.
C. The buffer zones shown on the mine maps dated November 2002 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception of
the installation of required sediment control measures and earthen berms, shall
remain undisturbed.
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen dikes,
silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from
discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland or natural
watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mining
Plan and Erosion & Sediment Control Plan, both dated November 2002.
C. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised erosion
control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a mining
permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not limited to,
expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of
overburden disposal areas.
D. The construction of the Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal Area shall be conducted
as indicated on the mine map dated March 14, 2001 and last revised June 8, 2001
with the following stipulation: the silt fence installation shown below the +25 Year
Storm Outfall shall be replaced with an adequate rock check dam measure and tied
into the silt fence installation on either side to provide more stable filtration of
concentrated flow.
5. Groundwater Protection
Groundwater monitoring wells shall be installed and monitored as deemed appropriate by
the Department.

• Page 5
A
7
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which can
be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. in any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, t ;e
erosion of which may cause cff-site damage because of siltation, shall be planted
or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain
such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any pit expansion conducted after
November 25, 1992 shall be graded to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
and shall be stabilized within 60 days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum
twenty-five (25) foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the top of the
rock and at the toe of the overburden slope.
Tho nffcr4tcrl lanrrll chnil he rlrarlarl cn ac to nrevent co!!ect_in_n of nnnl_ of wntP.r that are, or
1 IIV L411VV4VY .I..... •�
likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance no
farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or leased by
the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air overpressure,
anrri wihrntinn frcnilannv le►►e1c Chan ho leant fnr each hiast iexcent aS provided under
Sections B. and D.'of this permit). The following blasting conditions shall be observed by
the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from surface
blasting:
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of
ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of any
regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling house,
church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.
10.0
_25
9
y 2.0
" t.s
pu pp
a
0..
o.s
0.1
0.0
1.2
Blast Vibration Frequency. Hz
Figure 1 Alternative blasting level criteria
(SourCO modified from figure S-1. Bureau of Mines R18507)

• Page 6
B. GrQund Vibration Without Monitoring;
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following formulas:
W = (DIDS)2 Ds = D
W 112
V = 160(DJ-1.6
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
Ds = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second). -
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per second,
for the purposes of this Section.
' 19 A
Airblast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129 decibels
linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied
building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted area such -as
a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building,
1jnle.c nn nitprnata 1pvpl hnQAH nn tha canczAhAty of the ceicmngrnnh rnirmninnne
as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measurina_System. in Hz in dE!L
0.1 Hz or lower -flat response 134 peak
2.0 Hz or lower -flat response 133 peak
6.0 Hz or lower -flat response 129 peak
D. Airblgsl W thoUt Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following formulas:
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):
U = 82 (D/W0.33)•1.2
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x10-9)
Confined Airblast/Qverpressure (dBL)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35

• Page 7
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Airblast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).
The airblast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels; for the purposes of this
Section.
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to closest
offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of the blast.
Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be
provided to the Department upon request.
If ground vibration or airblast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting may
occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization to blast
at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the high
ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal approval.
Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
G. Flyrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temoararily or nermanently guarrieci by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on the
mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the investigation shall be provided to the Department within
10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document the
cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions that
will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with the .
approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine site.

• Page 8
•
t i s
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any seismic
studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a level allowed
by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production blasting program.
J. Notice:
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section Regional Office prior to any blast during a period
for which notice is requested.
K. Driller/Explosives Personnel Communication:
Closer communications between the driller and explosives personnel shall be
conducted. Voids and fracturing are quite discernible during the drilling process and
this information must be required by and shared with the explosives personnel.
L��iuMiTi
Weather related issues (such as temperature inversions) shall be scrutinized prior
to loading an upper level shot based upon the location and bench level of the shot. -
Blasting during temperature inversions should be avoided whenever possible.
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or fencing shall be
maintained at all times around the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public
access. In addition, a minimum 25 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at
the junction between the top of rock and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public thoroughfares
to screen the oneration from the nuhlir._ Additional srraaninn methnrls_ such as
constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed appropriate by the
Department.
`,B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the Erosion & Sediment
Uontrol Plan (EC-1) dated November 2002. in addition to grasses, long leaf and/or
Virginia pines or other acceptable species shall be planted as deemed appropriate
by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any approved revisions to
it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to on -
site implementation of the revisions.

0
• Page 9
12. Refuse D• isposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit area
unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from both the
Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971 generated
on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be disposed of in a
designated refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of in a disposal
facility approved by the Division of Waste Management. No petroleum products,
acids, solvents or their storage containers or any other material that may be
considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1) on -site generated land clearing debris
2) conveyor belts
e%k —LI--
JJ wlre Uitulub
4) v-belts
5) steel reinforced air hoses
6) drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit boundary,
the following information must be provided to and approved by the Division of Land
Resources prior to commencement of such disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the refuse:
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
a. verification that a permanent vegetative grounacover will oe establish ea.
E. Contaminated soil remediation (i.e., stockpiling of only petroleum contaminated soil)
shall be allowed at the site as indicated on the site map submitted to the Land
Quality Section with the additional information dated September 5, 1991. 1n
addition, it shall be conducted in accordance -with the rules and requirements
promulgated by the Environmental Management Commission.
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the Department
by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.

. 0 • Page 10
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a $500,000.00
Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the approved application.
I.JGllllli V UL"i Z hEr% Innri Olin IT4ll JGLUII+y .Jn} MenQin in fInrn for this nnm} M hn valir. +V{ul uffon+oV IuI -V .a-iun%J"'GIVIIII7 vL&lt%1not exceed the bonded acreage.
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted access
to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

' • . Page 11
APPROVED RECLAMATI N PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable
nhiinatinn of the ncrmiuy�cc uihinh nnn+in �— heyond the terms i ♦he II Ai..i.-g Ile rm,'a
..y...—I — ail r+v+r+nll�.v, •.+nv++ vv+iui+uao ucyvl+u LIIC. LGlIIIJ of II IC IVllllllll� r CIIIIIL.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated materials
shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent with the
future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
likely tV ue%vlTle ilUJiio41J, VUIV11j UE IVUI.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station
and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with mining
vperat1010, and in any event, provide reclamation ai the earliest practicable time after
completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and shall be
completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation shall
be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade (fence)
along the top of any highwall, and grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated
+nri'Ar
+ ! +GL LG! 1"I .
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
S. Any ling ponds and sediiiient cvntroi basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.

3
.19
• . Page 12
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
rVenneml of SRractn chn11 he in nr►rnrrinnra with Oncrntinn r..nnHitinnc Mricz 19 A
V IVl.IV VMI VI •MV.v V.rMrl YV rr. YV VV.4.. ar.IVV •bra.. Vr.lVr..Aar.r� vv••......rv••v •.vv• •.—.. ..
through E.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul water.
Reveggtation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
prepared by Mr. Paul C. Embler dated August 16, 1991 in the application for renewal dated
April 4, 1992.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season grasses
such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
in addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In any
event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or termination of
mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall
be completed within two years of completion or termination of mining.
This permit, issued April 9, 1972, renewed April 9, 1982, modified August 15, 1990 and
November 22, 1991, renewed and modified November 25, 1992, and modified May 27,
1994, April 21, 1995, October 17, 1997, May 21, 1999, and August 10, 2001, is hereby
renewed this 101h day of January, 2003 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
By:
James D. Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

r
. .
f
w
14,
AGGREGATESEAST
PERM
Sam
RENEWAL
r
t
S
e aRALEMN QUARRY Hanson
k

DPR/RRS Mining Permit Application
RRS Contact: D tk, n11
�'-J
Name of project: VOL lct
County: Y V
akv—
Log In #: 201
FOR e o for
Proposed activity is ✓ is not within 5 miles of a public park or recreation area.
If yes, identify the park: f uvo o 4- N a +i L,Y f-- Po-�-,�
Manager/agency name: J QW T)U.Ac-&v-L
(contact name):
(phone; fax):
email j 61 ✓1 Cr• .i, S
J ev—
Review conducted by: vvh,, � r ! Date:
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS WITH YOUR REVIEW/COMMENTS.
YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL YOUR COMMENTS TO:
Susan.Edwardsa,ncmail.net and Nancy.Adamsancmail.net
THANKS?
Return form and materials to:
Nancy Adams
DENRIDivision of Parks & Recreation
1615 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-I615
(Please Print on Yellow Paper)

Ai�A
NCDENR
North Carolina Deparlment o; Environment and Natural Resources
Division ol'WateT Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 6, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
FROM: Blake Rouse 0P.—
Water Allocation Section
Division of Water Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for:
Hanson Aggregates SE
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
John N. Morris, Director
Please find attached a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
The Raleigh Quarry located in Wake County should not have an unduly
adverse effect on ground water supplies.
Any water withdrawal will be subject to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.22H; Registration of Water Withdrawals and Transfers Required. Any
person who withdraws in one day 100,000 gallons (70 gpm) or more of surface
water or ground water in North Carolina is required to register the withdrawal
with the Division of Water Resources. A Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use
Area permit must be obtained from the Division of Water Resources if the
withdrawal exceeds 100,000 gallons per day and occurs in Beaufort, Carteret,
Craven, Duplin, Edgecombe, Greene, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Onslow, Pamlico,
Pitt, Washington, Wayne, or Wilson County.
If you have further questions please contact the Division of Water
Resources at [phone] or send correspondence to 1611 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1611.
JAN 7 2003 r'
27549.13111MENR
J
LAND Q AUTY 5E'CTION

i
1
r
1 C
I-D5 kz-A JO h
t "'y4a S E h (z 0.- t -1
i
[j
D vvl k J iVV) —to
� vv v
-4ryl")
vv

v ... � - �-- - -
- - -. _. ..
_ W�
y. �. ... .. � - -- �� ... � _ � _
_ _ � �_�.�. � � «-ram- �..
� -
� �_ � �. ._� _ ���_�...
_. ��. _ �� � .� � _1 _ _ v _a
y
+ i.
(�`
�
r

1
01/02/2003 02-0G
9195289PIq
FAX COVER
Falls Lake Office
Date
Number of pages including cover sheet 5--)
To:
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
PAGE 01
-114
NC Wildlife RasourcesC6rMASSI
Hab.1fat Conservation Prograi'm
1 1.85 tir�jc, 0
42 Service Road 4!
Creedmoo6kc
7M
. .... loft
From:
Phone [phone]
2
Fax Phone [phone]

01/02/2003 02:06
PAGE 02
9195289Q16 -
ON Noah Carolina WAMe Resources Commission 9
Charles R. Fullwood, E-xecutive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan B. Edwards, Mining program Secretary
d Quality Sectio`n�
FROM: araie e�. ender, Piecirno t region Coordinator
Habitat Consel-vation Program
DATE: 2 January 2003
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Raleigh
Quarry - Permit No. 92-02, Wake County, North Carolina
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have revidwed the
sLLV1GGL 11GJ.[l l It rGI1tW a1, arlu we are Ia111111[[[ with [11G 1JUIJI LdL va[uc� Vl. L11G QLGa. NJLLJ 1.o11.Ulit lHL3
are provided in accordance with provisions of the Mining Act of 1.971 (as amended, 1982)(G.S.
74-76 through 74-68 15 NCA.0 5).
Hanson Aggregates SE is requesting a rcnewal or their permit for mining meta granite on
a 437-acre site located near Falls Reservoir. The Meuse .River drains and borders the site. The
Ncusc River supports spawning runs of blueback herring (A.losa aestivalis), hickory shad (Alosa
mediocris), alewife (.41osa pseudohar•engus), American shad (Alosa sapidissima), and striped
bass (Mor-one swcatih's) downstream of the project site and is considered an important
recreational fishery; therefore, protecting water quality is essential. In addition, the state special
concern four -'toed salamander (I-fenridacrl-liuni scuiatum) is known from the area, and there are
historical records for the state special concern Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi). The
applicant has indicated that a minimum 50 foot undisturbed buffer will be mahitained for
watercourses and wetlands.
We recommend that the following conditions be incorporated into the permit to reduce
impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
In order to reduce stream impacts, while retaining some measuve of wildlife habitat, we
recommend a minimurn 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial
streams, and a 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands for the present
operation and any future expansions. Adequate riparian habitat and Nvaterslred protection
is essential to the continued survival of rare aquatic species. Maintaining undisturbed,
forested buffers along these areas will reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources, water
quality, aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area. and help prevent
.. Mal ling., Addrus: UIV151on oI lfll,tiid Fi.s17c1'JC.s ' 1 72 1 ivtail ervIcc Ccntci - RilkIb11, 27699-172 L
Tcicphonc: [phone] cxt. 281 - Fax: [phone]

01/02/2003 02:06 91952898 PAGE 03
Page 2
2 January 2003
Hanson Aggregates, Raleigh Quarry
r�nri�it No. 92-02
the extirpation of endangered and threatened species. In addition, these buffers will
nrnvide an nrlPrnmtp trm,p) rnrr dnr fnr wiMlif,- cnonipc Wheronq A vrAC4P1t t}11ifAr
particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer but will not provide the necessary and highly
valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers. We request that sediment and
control measures be located outside of these buffers.
2. Water discharges from the project site should be proportional to the size of the receiving
stream so that the Hydrology of the stream is not altered, andall discharges should comply
with 1\TPDES permit requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be
maintained at or below the permit requirement. High water discharge rates and turbidity
can negatively impact aquatic and f sherics resources within and downstream of the
project area, Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on.
aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and
clogging of gills of aquatic species.
I We encourage the applicant to consider using seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife
in their reclamation plan, such as native, warm season grasses. ,An exact seeding mixture
would need to take into account soil types, moisture, pH, and degree of slope of areas to
be stabilized. In addition, for relatively shallow sediment basin reclamation, we
recommend these areas be reclaimed as wetlands where practicable. We refer the
applicant to William Edwards, District Wildlife Biologist, at [phone] for
additional information and ideas on reclamation for wildlife.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this renewal. If you need
additional information, please contact our office at [phone].
cc: Steve Howiler, Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
T.racy Rice, USFWS

92-02 Raleigh Quarry • 0
Subject: 92-02 Raleigh Quarry
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:13:06 -0500
From: john holley <john. holley@ncmail. net>
T__ �j _'_�'__ 1 ' 1
Iu: fti-I 1n.mvyieVncrnaii.net
We have reviewed the subject application, and I offer the following
comments:
(1) Sediment and erosion control%ppear—adequate as proposed.
(2) DWQ:and=DAQ have no outstanding violations for the site, and noted
rfo=new issues.
Approval is recommended.
r ....................................................................................................................................................................................................-..............................—
..............................................................................................................................................................I.........
John L. Holley, Jr., P.E., CPESC <John,Holigaa.ncmail.net>
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
DENR
IofI
12/31/02 8:34 AM

mining permit 92-02 .
Subject: mining permit 92-02
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:52:11 -0500
From: "Pender, Danielle R."<[e-mail]>
To: "' Kristin. [e-mail]"' <[e-mail]>
Hi iKiisun, its we discussed yesterday,1 just received permit 92-02. 1 won't be able to get to this permit before the
week of the 3Qth. If I could get an extension, I would appreciate it. Thanks, and I hope that you have a nice holiday!
Danielle.
Danielle R. Pender
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Res. Comm.
1142 I-85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
aenderdr@mail. wildlife. state. nc. us
I of 1 12/20/02 11:02 AM

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Applicant's Name: - Project Name: LQA ���rr�l�y u
JJ J J -`
Applic./Permit No.:, Ll�-"O`llCounty: Date Received:
Reviewer: 6%.54)ys�{- River Basin Name:
❑ New Kplemewal ❑ Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Partial Release
Fee Received: $,5189A-
E Additional Information 0 Fee Needed: $
Pleaf2a route ire application racW to:
�d ?I.CQ DA!a tu, Regional Office (2 complete copies; attach the %Q5 Regional
Office Mining 4plication Review Checklist" to one copy and attach bJ�h th WC n�DA
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy; Send both copies to the egionai Engineer)
Date: Routed/ — ec'd
Division of Water Rcoource5 Date: Routed Rec'd
),Z:NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed ec'd
❑ U5 Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed 'Reed
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed
❑ NC Geological Survey 5ection Date: Routed ecd-
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑ Other: Date: Routed Rec'd
**5uopen5e Date for Comments: (no to than 5
from receipt)
�s .�a1L
XPlease note the following:
�dayo

• A''7,A •
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist December 9, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Danielle Pender
"abitat Conservation P rugram Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates SE
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
PIease review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
11ndiily nrlverse effect nn wilrlif- nnri freehxxrarar f cheries (!: C '7n G t 171NDI 1 �...
yx;x,.; x�.a `V • U. I T'.l 1 `r j) I Icasc respond Uy
December 20, 2002 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control
measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater
fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and
time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly appreciated.
Please contact Ms. Kristin Moyle at [phone] if vnr, have any question,
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -919-733-4574 I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post consumer Paper

• A Z A
NCDENR-
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist December 9, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr, Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources
FROM: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Natural Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates SE
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit renewal request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having an
unduly adverse effect on potable groundwater supplies (G.S. 74-51 (2)) or groundwater quality
(G.S. 74-5I(3)). Please respond by December 20, 2002 so that we may complete our review of
this request within our statutory time limits.
Any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on potable
groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to have any
recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality.
If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the
person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of
your comments to the person noted in the application.
PLEASE RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR
REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Kristin Moyle at
[phone] if you have any questions.
15 6:,
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -919-733-4574 / FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Past Consumer Paper

• ,A` A •
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
MEMORANDUM
December 9, 2002
TO: Mr. Phillip McKnelly, Director
Division of Parks��ax}d Recreation
FROM: Susan B. Edwards, Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining permit Renewal Request for Hanson Aggregates SE
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
Please find attached for your review a copy of the first three pages of the mining permit
renewal application and a location map for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having a
significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park, forest or recreation area
(G.S. 74-51 (5)). Please respond by December 20, 2002 so that we may complete our review of
this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control
measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on publicly owned parks,
forests or recreation areas would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site
inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a
convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the
application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR
REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly appreciated.
Please contact Ms. Kristin Moyle at [phone] if you have any questions.
/S BF.
Attachments
cc: Mr. John 1lol;ey
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919-733-4574 1 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

oro
000
o ■ o Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
November 22, 2002
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612 h
Re: Mine Permit Renewal
Raleigh Quarry - Permit # 92-02
Dear Ms. Wehner:
W snelnn A nnrnnft4ne Q^a 4keee+ Inn wishes to provide yo, Ir office with info, I anon
11. P'V '1 / Will vaQLVJ WWUU 1vOOL, 11 IL.. 1r1011Qp IV VF VV IVQ rVMI VIIIVG •VILII II I IVI1110 LIVII
required for the renewal of the mine permit at the Raleigh Quarry (Permit # 92-02) in
Wake County.
Enclosed you will find five copies of the completed mine permit application, five
sets of design notes, and a check in the amount of $500.00 to cover the permit renewal
fee. The design notes cover erosion and sedimentation control measures involved in an
attempt to better delineate and define overburden and waste disposal areas previously
permitted. Also, three sediment control ponds were previously permitted and the
construction of these ponds is currently in progress. The design notes cover what will be
the as -built conditions for these ponds as necessitated by operational changes.
Five sets of permit renewal drawings are being forwarded under separate cover
from our environmental engineering office located in Greer, S.C. The sets of permit
renewal drawings will each contain the following individual drawings:
Cover Sheet
Sheet 1 Of 5
Mining Plan
MP-1
Sheet 2 of 5
Erosion Control Plan
EC-1
Sheet 3 Of 5
Reclamation Plan
RP-1
Sheet 4 of 5
Typical Cross Sections
X-1
Sheet 5 of 5
Please note on the permit application form that we are changing the permanent
address for the receipt of official mail to the new North Carolina Area Office in
Morrisville. Please address all future correspondence concerning this permit to that
address to the attention of the writer.

We trust that the information provided is sufficient; however, should you require
any additional information, do not hesitate to contact the writer.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Ale -
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Environmental Coordinator SC/NC
Enclosures

WYAIISC �V-
mo v q]mea-acmf ic'
r, 1 '10, X) 'COU, cy �p paipc

0
0
scam
m"mNanson
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30084
62-4/311
VOID AFTER 60 DAYS 61889
411111-1 5 0 0 c" t
PAY 'J ja a
DOLLARS
Uk`cw � CAR—Ir HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC,
MELLON 13ANK N,&, PHILADELPHIA. PA (0310)
PAYABLE THROUGH MELLON BANK 10E) N.A., VWLMINGTON, DE

LI
Memo
Date 26 November 2002
■❑i
■■■
i ❑ i Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
Greer Office
P.O. Box 2657
Greer, SC 29650
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
To Judy Wehner, NCDENR, Div. of Land Resources, Land
Quality Section
Location Raleigh, NC
Copy File
From Nuwan Wijesuriya
Subject Raleigh Mine Permit Renewal Drawings
Dear Ms. Wehner,
Please find enclosed, 5 sets of drawings relating to Hanson Aggregates
Raleigh Quarry's Mine Permit Renewal.
Sincerely,
r
Nuwan Wijesuriya.
DEC - 2 2002
t
1 of 1

�7
NOV 2. 5 2002 � 1
1 1 C 15l]
NORTH CAROLINA""'­-­
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION
Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 mail Service center
n r.6 AIx%r.t-6, r-% r+^1 4 M-% 17 G n n I G9 7
Ra I C 11111 UVWf Li f %-CXI V 1 1 i la L 1 V77-1V1L.
[phone]
Revised 10/2000
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County, NC
Mine Penult Renewal Application
November, 2002

r-
flu
i
1 1

•
NORTH CAR01INA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT '.
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
S ;'r
LAND QUALITY SECTION ; 4 NOV 2 5 2002 li
4 4
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine.- Hanson Aggregates southeast. Inc. :gip' County Wake
River Basin Neuse, , Latitude (dd.mm.ss) N35-55-53 Longitude (dd.mm.ss) W78-32-4
2. Name of Applicant*_Hanson Aggregges Southeast, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 3131 RDU Center Drive. Suite 220. Morrisville, NC 2-7560
Attention: SteveHowiler. PE, Environmental CoordEntor. NC/SC
TelephnnP R-43-537_7883
4. Mine Office Address_ 1501 Capital -Boulevard Raleigh. NC 2766 - - _ - -- - -
Teiephone 919-556-4011
5. Mine Manager Chria Warsi
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
� 6Y
P
Title Vice-P id n N Am
* This will be the naive that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond {securityl that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G. S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt ofa
c m 4ftte application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed n1LA all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
_1_

J)I.oi
scQQ&
W" We "J41111 rii flAwcf�;!f Oil "pi V bfLUij
Ne'.Wj, 011,11%7z.
j;rc!If),j 111n."f IL JrIKIUMA ISUIPM
ij
j:le "j! 11
"d)-r f,,j,:f :dill UR LWLQ[ IQ PG !Anal to Inq fy.�
I rtP1,44P)II,
p6m WAT •mut up shme sommufe, !rl "g"' OIL I COG I luc?'Umc I II WE PGA OLOR I.
if
all ATIOU
I" e1VLel p l Dry nUaj
q im m"
14011111 UINSIMI DINOW3 JR y1j, Us. F&I HAVIYURM
0 0

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
■ OF : All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining -
operation
or the intended life of the mine. All responses Mpg be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
detailed mime map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer 0 of the following that apply:
1. a. if this is an application for a permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
Me permit (this is the acreage that new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: Acres
teased: Property owner if leased:
If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining ermit number and
the total (overall) acreage cover y the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: 22-02
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that ttie "renewal" fee will be based upon): 4 7
c. If this is an application for a MQDWICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
m a.n�ar a"A *hp *-4si /.,. Ih n ..�aL...
111ARIAM a ULAW L.FV LvLaU tVTVAµu) G V+bggG cV VGrT+N Vy LIM V1 AIaLIIIJ5 peIIIUL. IYLuiullg rclllliL
No.: Total permitted acreage:
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes— Now If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage that
the "major modification" fee will be based upon).
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application form
entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes No (if no, a "minor
modification" fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to
be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
If this is an application for 3-7RAN§FEfJ of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit; Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage;
■ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Meta Granite
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck ,X— Shovel & Truck
Dragiine & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
-2-

._._._.�.. ..,...._. 1.t1"lt'illy 4aN` .-•-- - --• -- C r3;,'t 1t3�i 'JLf.'��ii ! ._ _ . ---' t 4Ei3r'7 �t.'J.be�'311'E -'--�__._ ._...._.
, !y1{; i e;3� ick;' i �,r ?I3fi'€["• �`ll�r'fCE --�-�- •- --.. !)iE -•s,i r cr.�t ;r cJ' ! r _ ....,.�. 3 rr
3' ��. . 'si €• -�- �• ►. i F:t. .r ;'3 �' i� .,, f^ tT..i` ..r: i.Eic��,�ti��;.�s�,
.. 4�atii� r�j.::'E{ t,J,`[tfat:ii2 t3.tEEtrit ...._ ..�#�lit..�.�� �:i,C '-... , .._ _.,_ __ ., _.. _ --- _ __. _.._ _.�_---•---•-- -- - --
II a011l:
b� )'I *AO ik0lS.I.E4f, i�Et ��3i�.��'.3'.1'��� �r�a�i'�1f,b. 6 �;..�.Id�!.�1r.;g �t';�;tt :_:4) �!Ro�:�x��3;.�i��d��,� `�'�..i��:��i�.F; �0r.1.iD�
�E71: + A!y 1.�_F, "f 14:1)F. ;: `' J' 331.E- E"'0 Od: J-11W �'d L 0 M .e..!ItE V(Ob-ft`SS i;!'o '1MiI'A.1.J.0
i; ..'C�:t{;.'t!.tii���'a CK. ?s14C,��+R'{ �`>'� ��• �i,! f f,i.:! [�: 1��€. 1. � fir'!. { �t�3 :�.�.__--._ ......._
'° LL ii[. L+: 1•. 7.f� ' J i {? i� r =1� Jt� s. 1.J
1:e J? .911 i7 )iJJ r,! !ou t]t. �; t o �} " + �7 �i t3ifi[!u1 1 I i; iT f ^:�R fi T'' !i �i t r uJ 1:•;,,, ' i
{ E . € . 3. 4.t l�1 #.a�d� i. bG'. 31, 7 j€ f ;�... TJ:)JI,,lfF'I b6•.tA ►. 1.tt, t ri t1
pr -tqq j m !pr, +�U'� w, :� C}1G ZMLG:sF-{. Wt$l CIIC r,li[F IOL i.tl q',LiGi#il0U., { � - :�:1.''1 j)5
1{[iii+ i[i :;�t `#t.t#T,�i''C fC+ fl:: `i.�ti {[i{r lf.I(:J�i1 ��1� :T+iLru' e+; g)
rn Il 1, !;:"[ 1 .1 ?l' i1.:t.12 iiy 1_Ci+; ( f >+'i f' ,� sr• I 'f: 1 r' i !'
L.. : r_ C,C:i �:v :_ .- ' -- 7 �. .i'.73.11 C.Y€.r .�l �i .tty S'• % } is {.ict �Et3� iS; .(,�.
pr :iggq fo oin
r s : �«_-�..__._..- .. •, a : "-. r, r r.e rr try nnli„rrrr Srtli i �•1 rii:
trJCli{tit.iFjrt}7 ( f : € i i« f.i]'E i3171S 4[]7S€ll�r.l'.v I�� r'R.[R;.i.li.'iu t- crL4lrr. sar-.J a...ET,
+J!%....-. .._ ._ ti }.r:: JCfi;+. (I.: j{: 3fa : 1f
r
4[;" VICL tuix-Itx W,L 016 'Wj;lsU.fi mtt .GCS
C�1.^. r,ijti��V.'i iUiiy!}TCJiiUt}� i�Ey M€i� �;; j.`.ltit'>`� F:i,}i:2;J�•' ��_ ��_._. _ ..-- -. _.
}.kJ{i; i.T,iflijlGit.,,•c�{[Ftl.'r f r .,.1 r '.I
6 i.€Y!,? :
�1Ir7
lJi#i13 :!, '}t3Cj S � �C1j.f3� (i).;f1C[�!- � it>; a':"3�iCy t;'.fii.Cititr" F!, ; ]G ;n t+',i'�t f1i:' k�'lJ;ii1 _i�•"t's`ti� �€.rl;T(
[: jj,f31% r� .iti :ttii)i1[, t,.i:all ir.[..t yt�[.��.��L".��. r,�.6Qr+r�? .(t,1 i .J.JJ.iT;i l•"i.illlt' 3#.�.:..i.r ,tlt; i.€,f1,:tl:Ya a}f:1,LJ
f.) F)G !tit rtt E I .", r C : r Tut; n•J F' '1r,. J1r]!.
.1. ; : +�:i.£:�Iir { {;il? �. ?; ti. T;i., t• [#€il {� r lli"� i P � �t+ � r6: fRt�'� �:�, �,- ,'' �� ....,���
i� ii.#}Jli 7;� ifi! 19 �t'';Lr ,t�s��s [ �, 3 I !i':rz �t !. )tf' iiti;t:;W{.0 1�3i JJt:lJilji'
�rj:4'aF.;' • ..._._._.._ ....._-... �i[•1'�;3.fr (7.: lii:k. i�t+-:'i;+`r;#�.-.......-.._._ ...�...._-_.....,.. ... ....___^.�...... ....� �......
:.r�Tvi�Ji1'JCI:a�1 s ;' �RCirr I!'{lr.�I J� a::.ti!^'.� {€ti:f ::�i14= J;]r3 :ft 3�' 1Cit1GCJ} ',rrt.i.C■ oi'l.:ic':.}:�
Up"? poy.qvi 'S!' 4;riri r1?TJi wo-, IF](!:1.i bt:t.:111f1; %CiG' ti'q pr-, p!."2Jir' JF�+i3lJ�:
! t�}s. !✓ .3I ,€r.l Stltr,.l4f.iii ;CJ3,. f.{ / C'. , t �1..i,J'v luasC,'t.?'. i �l]�.4] .r l`i.�t.1• ,( 1il"r r;i; fi }iF �'7(
f,.t41U )]C..1A.,1iit�,i.l .we ;lii'..', ���, Ai'.�''•:
}..�li€,'I¢8E1�F !(B9, i;ft', ii3ixu)f3'+tj !1& 4i b�i. F33s:T?;' �� 1�E•G�i(iiic�s:7}lJdSe74 Y,�S�:t3.�! P•G4}
+1 tF rL' 1 11{r {FaFrtJ, �Slilii •,i{ if�•�ii[ ?5! d. !1l[.S•P-a #}:-.: A�-; {:- fSJ3C;i.3r.�e.i.�!'. t-.i'sY:: '•i H i� is �R'+�` i. Pr:;,:_ir. +itZ.wo ej f.t Rllr•v- iiaT. yJa�r+T!.r41 +1.
LS ..1 STIi�f'.i�Li+`rill i.d.
40
0

•
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) -AN'
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
natuca1 around_ nt = 70'_ above mean ma level
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) -- 4001 , ...._ ..,.,,,.._.
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes__-_ j No
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? ,Hanson & entities now owned by Hanlon
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum): 10
I:Mu"
1. Clearly mark and label the location of your minin,* operation on ix 6 i of a 7.5 minute quadrangle
and a county highway map. These maps, in addition to six 061contes of all mine maps and reclamation
maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5 minute quadrangles may be obtained from:
a•.%'. vwavgICAU FauxrCy
NCDENR
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Hi ayy Commission
Raleigh, orth Carolina 27602
[phone]
-3-

{ e1iflFif. E►_iJ�/1$i: 3s1'.3EJ%- f1.Ff+A �::; CI�)j,:l:l:rt�; j.f,!'i;,lf.
ja''flf;t•�J^ �• �3i.�,jJ (;t�Li:jil3ii :��1C;(?"i t' i .Jv if
`s !3: im r dlfriC�i.'FL'_�€;' 1Ii!jh j]t. S pr-,, [ rq f.A.:31f1:
H.?;�i .rt, :�1 kt;JiF }�131CS;E'"w
�- - � i�"�1 �• •1 . _,+ �,t •ire: T!' "<<� 7C] :is%' fl9 i''fFii.[!.A 1 Sr•; 1 t'%'r? 1C; �"•' Fieii.i'}i lfitt
•kji
€ S E',`•=etf. °!".fij:'1;)f} �t;'E:F ;F1'-: ftFt'.ii� {?t.f�^a�(1:'!i !1,,t3ifii� (l�i }.3.ir'11} C't1: !• ce t obri-4+: Ce1. Si i L< ]i.;ll!f'�! ,;{t`frgm3i7t n.
tfifUl��G1. �1 , . ;'71.� �tyl. �.{�1TC;J l7SFi �';314;j!� I.t'(�ttr?1��� �{[1 �:.;it't :1;Clilir;I'3;1: � :�y__.- --•--- -• --- ,_..... _.�_- _
h. lkt;:E (10 JO. -- IYON1 I.'N fElilg_Vfzi3�s'! J +4+; C,!"�`i1:le.e`YC#til {�P/-i�3,'j ;}i': ��ii7f�+lY?f
m }.tx,1) !Iullstj
i.
k3. LA--bcc,-c-j uc.:. R—1 ; .W11:v ;r;ti.T`►
��f4 i; °6°dt m.., am W,.•�; ��1� �3f?�1f�4 !.ilG�`i! BG:3
1)i��ttJlsli.? (<f'ii" U$F{31 Y'� f�;.ifTi7:C7 IT ' i,! :lfl�'.1Ei 2,^.:1 f1ii.C.-•c` `e.if.I�� s•;� ,t; iEJ�Ji!' ;��;
13J;,h';1J3r�3i J ] t f^ �� } 'Set•sl� .__ r_ ,..._. ....��._..,.... _.._._-- - -- _._-....
0 0

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
t0pograpluc maps ofthe entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits can
only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps must
be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, RU
minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and ri*hts-of-way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
gg Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
• VIA+'--e and acrcagG of Will sleLiiuig s-SWA Vr prWOressing wartewatCi flu'-.
Location roads and acreage of all planned and existing access anon -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary which He directly across and are contiguous to any highway; creek,
stream, river, or other watercourse; railroad track; or utility or other public right-of-way; if an
adjoiningg tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
names ofowners of record oftracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining
permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has
four lanes of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
l . Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
(NO"lE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)
-4-

noOUUt, 1q;rt RI tie! pc� imu
.KW�r; f,m
Y;,711 - W", I.,X11
Y,Wf t"My"Myli
All Q1 (w
lj9dv d CAN?
• )!Q.10 in rveuqp, i)1v �ve� 1.orcrjy
sriIryuWp..p.pgr
OWUM Aj 47jOUM.A" po -,!ya owl m, o f Jr!11 1-1� tpr,
ip , - OLM
I)ITI&I 'LIP'
, tjr, k4l'The 1""aur. upmmq "Lomp urproulas q;G?G 1=11 tpR$ Wr.
f3'TOI:Tlf; ;P Ou W.'.! lit. i-v, fp�� 0.1, .1 F f1mjjCq ji
A;I,.j p ri q . 1) (11 p 1) rt I qK- .; �,.,-q V 0 ", a L I " Una P 0; p qq kp U I syn Sol 0 W! up I
Ni?ft q1majaw q hoboaq wCoRum., uq r.ml!O.-f
1 pyi0M.'NPA'm�tm1Mff—yg 0111 Wj l:nq 1,1Of.j..
"pu Onq of fit, inl.lif ,I iVfl;r� 131"0, PC qmv 01 in vo loci pil
oi .i� mqp( ot,ap.,,i,q(;o
q t 0405 M! p 19 p U1 yo ply; -W Utz
rif! 0� IT, litri —oq
111Va 111PG MW OL MqV U11 QCj, JPS WbOxf UJ"UUfqCO1.Qj :0 10 f0a"Vil
1ATIAN
tJ q,q MIG AqvVIN AMBATWOU;
AO ! u,uqv,-mo-!irm7�o-
.Jjuup1rgpr—m,rm-,q,qq-jm
plotANI Lobo Op" &UPS A plu, ;IM nj4pt, Q11,6411Y. OP
7600 1.1 WO lt6il I by"'Is - 1%711.
0 0

• 0
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine man that clearly lists the approximate acreage oftailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other maj-or aspect of the
miring operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
11
Stockpiles
5
Wastepiles
38
Processing Area/Haul Roads
22
[Mine Excavation
76
Other (Future Reserves)
32.5
TOTAL = 184.5
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE-
CPErMIC iNI MUMATVIN TUAT iC PROVIDED I.N. THE .SWE Q TO THE FOLLOiiYmG
QUESTIONS IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED
QUESTION&STATEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE
CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY
ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
-5-

� � M
0 •
0 •

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference the
sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
The e�..Qat.ii" +�.aile;gi'a Yu aw j' is aimvst %IV i.iciy devello at the preselit iliitC. ��7----uriu[1WI1
minor expansion ot�the quarry to the northwest an southwest will take place during the life of this permit
as the quarry deepens. Necessary erosion and sedimentation control structures, visual buffers, etc. are
generally to place to support this minor development. As the pit is expanded horizontally, the disturbed
areas are graded so that they drain back into the pit as much as practicable. in areas where this will not be
possible or desired, proposed erosion and sedimentation control devices as indicated on the permit
drawings will be installed as development progresses to control any offsite sedimentation.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include spec fic plans for sediment and erosion control for mine
excavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of
installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion
control measures on the mine map(s) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details of each
measure. Engineering designs and calculations shall be required when needed to justify the adequacy of
any proposed measures.
See attached drawings for locations of existing measures and previously approved plans and
supporting calculations for specific details. This information has not changed since last previous submittal.
Currently a new pit dewatering settling pond and two stormwater ponds are being constructed on the west
side of the affected area. The stormwater ponds will accept runoff from the plant, shop, existing and
future overburden/waste disposal areas, and existing and future product stockpilareas for treatment prior
to discharge through the NPDES outfall associated with the final existing stormwater pond. These ponds
were previously permitted in a different configuration and the effort here is to basically provide for as -built
conditions. See attached drawings and design notes for specific details. Overburden/waste disposal areas
not previously fully delineated are also delineated in this renewal application, along with specific erosion
and sedimentation control measures.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes X No . If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
The crushed stone production process requires water for washing the sized stone products at the
wash screen to remove dust and fines for their eventual use in asphalt and ready -mix concrete. The water
is recycled through a closed-circuit process water settlint pond system. Wash water from the plant is
nnlIddit* a i anti Rio ,zfnrnli +^ ^"— . r +..,,. ...a.-., r.i.-A. e. e + F f1.— C:-- .l ! l..
waavvaw a &" "euvel d to vaai. of two pnniwr puma, vwlwl-G aisVall Vl WK, •Ll Ms are reliiioveU vy sllllply
settling out of suspension. These ponds are used in sequence, with one being out of service at any one
time for dipping out of the collected fines using a dragline or long -reach excavator. The water then flows
to the secondary pond where settling of additional finer particles takes place. This pond also serves as the
plant fresh water pond and the clean water is pumped back to the plant for reuse in the stone washing
process. Due to loss to evaporation from the ponds and loss into the stone products, the water balance is
-6-

s}ic z I.f % viij-1, In I of laij ju 0"1 qw b r)wje vaq list n qj,?wiw Pz I e
lirlq4
Ili jt i -,"'Icl; 1"J.1%, .1 W. ft.ifqt. "yu"P
Oot!q? ,,,I t,i�jlj DIP', 06h.1,; �_rrjj f
q_ j ii 'itj/ oT•
00r. Of W-11 rl.txlr, ol :;v!, -'jjct 0jI;-,q �w 'miAX
lI
v A.-
h0#1q 'rX?J' '"b' j" 9-1-) !WL0 VpG ')jkMj To
.1 CIO
!11.0 q i ;cj bi.oru"I i -Af jux-i, 1! rq, I. 1. 15." j I Y. -e: 0:' j It -qf I C F u 1 :1
isT" Wl?i ,'. 1,
I- I !jj r',:j, !4.1jr
V-1.11114GO VJ :t1r.1-Q M�. CMOU Id. ',C) IgIlit
jj 4 p I("?
sil;q
fl Of LM f0lj
f,G! r.�i 1111f, b.ifIftl M ;�J1"J�t3!`A'to IjU �;r"�j
W il 0iLg,o.1 C.1jijj! L. !jtV Clr,l
A'p, ;,;!
;e K:�a M Ile'
!Ir'.., PI)!
ov ;0," U (ji, Wtl
��!13 0 1!:iM M Ar.'. 1510 it. 3$ v.
Ni1.. -•7I IF t.0, 1 q-
0' L t
gs': tic; pr
'I
f.V 11IL "AfCT.
N�
fi!�;!r a-1 'Air, WJO� PPM'�.A �,O lo zx. 14,,, 11 114� ol. I ill oll
It's "tt '.Zw fArf,4sf,%1 31ijrl
.:I , I -
f LIC, / ;�.Wf 1,, 1 1 t 1, S, y i 1.1

0 •
periodically restored by supQlementinp with ground water pumped from the quarry as part of the
dewatering process. A pump is also maurtained in the Neuse River for purposes of replenishment of the
system during exceptionally dry times.
Water is also used for dust control at the facility. Water is used at the processing plant by introduction
through sprays at crushers and at conveyor transfer points to control dust emissions. It is also used in the
water truck to control dust emanating from haul roads, stockpiles, and the shot rock pile in the quarry.
Water used in dust suppression is usually pulled either from the quarry dewatering or from the secondary
settling/fresh water pond.
At the present time: no chemicals are used in any of these processes; however, we ma apply to Water
Quality for permission to used chemical flocculants in the recycle system to help in achieving a cleaner
source of water for the plant washing and .dust control. We may also apply for permission to use
chemicals such as calcium chloride or organic surfactants on the haul roads and crusting agents on the
product stockpiles.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yee No TT— L-;,,1y,. d.-s ,. ibe he ,.. tiar . -J-1al . " her __ .._.r
State? i Yes _ ./n. 1 V L �Gu, Vf JGf y i.LFJ{+J LUG L1LG IJ(JJ JJI G Vf LILG NLaH 7Li1/b'G iL:i41
locate all proposed discharge points (along with' their method of stabilization) on your mine map(s).
We currently have an NPDES Permit (#NCG020209) that covers the discharge of excess ground
water from the quarry dewatering process, as well as any excess water from our closed circuit settling
pond system. The discharge water is treated by simple sedimentation in a separate settling pond ((currently
being reconstructed) and then flows to another existing small pond prior to being discharged through a
riser and through pipe to the Neuse River. These ponds and the discharge point are shown on the attached
plans.
The NPDES permit also allows for the discharge of storm water from the nine site through
multiple paint source discharge points. These storm water discharge points off active mine areas are also
indicated on the nine plans.
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table?
V es.J. —'1Vo It yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X ,SNo It'yes,
what impact, if an , will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal rate in
gallons p day: 0 00 Locate all existing wells on the mine map(s) that lie within 500 feet of
the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any conclusions or statements made, including
any monitoring well data, well construction data and current water withdrawal rates. Indicate
whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water system or private wells.
From analysis of the core retrieved from exploratory drilling and the existing quarry, the granite
appeal a to have v e j little primary peivneabifir . 1 Ie orliy ll.ewjs !n which water) maji uG i! ifils�l led wWiil
be through secondary permeability (i.e. joints, fractures, shears, etc.); however, from core analysis, RQD
values are in the 95% to 95% range below the weathered rock interface and these joints and shears do not
appear to be interconnected. The surfaces of the fractures and joints show very little evidence of
mineralized coatings as a result of water transportation.
-7-

— i —
' 1cr" v �.fq j p�'r�ej- :wup (It., -I'M 'JLm' Eli Olf. �J'j "11 If !'I�'l 1011 70
e 1,?
I I "'Ttr f� �tnVljrvil
!If: F '.1 1.
5.
1 000
"Imi34 IlUb7r.1 Im"I Tmor, jl-F)Ac 0 Lf j 1, f 1 .6 r 1.1 fi fr C, 1, 1 jj. "I I MV fe.' 11 N, U LIT.""I PA'; Mj(r It I
1) It, nga.
p.!:1 'qu'A lie, bwb'�'m'(j 'upfr"\
'1'�
-j!rtTtf'q {)i; J!"O mil'.Z7 1)14411?
1-1-ow'( ;-ull-sx, q'im'JulAc Dolwvjjx-r- &w;.j!j ItG 1P20
ELI;; UnCO" 'I'll I.Tif4sr., b6ltf blio!.
j '� uw".f 13cl.
,-niq I.t�2tow- lit, qt2­11vi I!,; I? Rc-lrfillf
t..Ptc "ilIpn� "n". je1
X InAr 'I
10 LPG A\VVIU, v V%'J�
P, NIi DG�'�F'!01U), UA MUii. uo1Ip'-I.;;ljf' li.bp �qv-" !r bc�.""j jmJ ;a"FCtI t.
btowicr ,wq
CUT"'Wij cp'(f w'x# nrl Av�jq;; OL" RIC
•
eC.1 D C"j., qxo Ma, isa�JfLAM1.J!G;6"LIfeq!jmn1"
=;'fipliE. !p;*.p Lrwq-
!% ie;'! 4105C ILOW W�-, dilf],,iX fp�%
DR! WM i"I
CC
0 0

Removal of the overburden has very little effect on shallow wells in the area since the pit for the
most part sits on a topographic high and very little recharge area for shallow wells will be disturbed. The
overburden materials in the pit area are silts, clays, and sand which inhibit groundwater migration.
The 100,000 gpd reported above includes water accumulating by rain falling directly into the
quarry as well as stormwater runoff from areas contiguous to the open pit.
If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.)
from the Division of Water Qu ity, ater Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required
to register water use with the Division of Water Resources ifthe operation withdraws more than
100,000 gallons per day And needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if
the operation lies in a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
The Raleigh Quarry operates under NPDES Permit NCG020209 as issued byNCDENR-Water
Quality and as outlined above.
a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions?
Yes X No If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air
quality permit issued by the Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
The Raleigh Quarry operates under Air Quality Permit # 4151 as issued by NCDENR
Division of Aix Quality and is in full compliance with the requirements thereof. A complete system
of water sprays is in place at all crushers and conveyor transfer points to controlparticulate
emissions from these sources.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
As stated in 3(a) above, a water truck is used to apply water to haul roads, muck pile, and
stockpiles as needed to control fugitive emissions from these sources.
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mmiing permit boundary or right-of-
way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sv ttiyai writ? of ""000 es u�'i{sy VG iiial.Riied witi`lii{ it), an usld L4ir bed bu buffer (llV dI`�LI11 Ut�ifi're
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions.
Note that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary
or right-of-way at this site'? A minimum butler of25 feet is recommended, although awider buffer

"c JGT P LGCOU3EN60(r6q, fmllof'.�Ril o m!rj�;L p1j.jrI
pj) pr, Tj P�;,, /?' gr,]., fm �. w) I quh Sq 1 r I t 9 Uq hi A JA i1j! lift p D., it:qfni�
LI WE I I PRIFL8 UN MI pr, 10? ;J! rt',.! j 1 tz, f 1: 1 'R, Ili, "', m! I F, (.'I t! p
"WILDI LK7800? 1W V, NNSHT AWN "I t• Fit) (jsfi
it IA 11 mat (ih)
41.1;194.. .'A{mnq 15MGM) UnA WPM IWAU? Nq V4 EiM.iCA Jfjcf.m!(
am 0hp, an acrqyj in cowl Wkmc awy oqua low ipm mmm-
'IR mly! in j("j) I !" n2cq lu VbNA /Ulu 10 paq Imp, uml Aqu vy
p 1 jum mp! Qn?" tlow ps q tymy aw PC namoqpq,
�po'ji y!(;-v3
vom SLOW !e 4n5pG? A 2,j C01 "o
I)FI10"OL, rymmA my, 1:1 tin lampmox mgp qm Wipmgm pacau
(ilvvm;. !�, I] i')
A!(IiIjOC lj;'fff ]011 'Y101=1 VQ GL OpWpnj NH 4TI-
U!3
vjl,
vErv4pu gm at a cubunG lien MAO suq m qu Wme opm ( li..m
41`4 11 A q A 954 AQ 2 P MEIJI nit hCUP p #j (IIJ-1 ijt,-- Q1 41 TViP0$ L
vc 'j)L 1,1:i, ;;t!f40r Zj*i.%0Jh,-.Q !I !1�6 0D6i.RiWI'!:j 11K,", ra l'M
Ae iIi 2TWUN W V;(Joq;j",
Joe 0q) pbol Ichouccl vpnon jqjj!!IR q!Lv. t,'*A' fora
!IJ 1i;r- Vli OLS Site vISAY m! m! 0. vq,, �iq,�', py nn:�i vrm
i 2!1-4 o"I !I uvq
Ignmilm: uty vy,fij,pm!("o ot., �'.nnqov. "spy POL ly

maybe needed depending on site conditions. Show all buffer locations and widths on the mine
map(s).
It is anticipated that a minimum 50' undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any
mining activity and existing property lines or highway rights -of -way. In general, an additional
minimum 50' disturbed buffer will be maintained between any excavation and existing property
lines or highway rights -of -way, to addition, it is Hanson's policy to maintain as much ofa buffer
as practical between the operations and adjoining properties until such buffer areas are needed for
operations
A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and and+ natural watercourses and wetlands u. nless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet may
be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbin& activities within
the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all
buffer locations and widths on the mine map(s).
A minimum 50' undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities
and any natural watercourses and wetlands on this site,
i ne attached plans and previously approved plans show specific details relevant to buffers
at each location.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
minimum 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes,
In order to prevent landslides and/or slope failure adjacent to adjoining properties, cut
slopes will be graded to no steeper than 1 I/2:1 and fill slopes will be graded to no steeper than 2:1.
Proper compaction procedures shall be used on fill slopes. All slopes will be stabilized by seeding
as soon as possible after grading has been completed. Necessary erosion controls will be used to
prevent slope failure by concentrated storm water runoff. Excavation or fill shall not generally
occur within 100' or 50' respectively of any adjoining property boundary or right-of-way except
for visual barrier berms.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine maps) for all fill slopes (berms,
■■ wastepiles, overburden
Aert.- v"I fvwa/ T "f! I ..Io...l.f fH�l/./LtrHR il,o ;"f""dill f i.4i 1—� RrRi --f .»e/�.Il..fiE,>•. �,t
�vafa.{• b{f Y{�Laa, YLY.J) YfYN!►,' LILYLLYNlI/I� LILY flfiYrL " 064 JIV,/Y 5lK fffff, i■LJfNL/6L/f Vlf V L'�"J
benches and/or slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the met/rod of
final stabilization.
See attached mine plans for generalized locations. For more specific details see previously
approved plans and derails.

pro RMCP91 Ulu", it'qw...ow,
11141 %11 'J.tA I', kn"( 11A I "IyaAgaM "joymnowl 101VAYAK too! Q "=I YUJI
owor.
10 61.
I v !Lr, P- -.f)U=QQ1CQ dIM; MAN M;1711�
biounpu, apaq PC ney (ai gplyton, jqj quyn 1"Np, ;I 1;j!qAU VIS w"T"Alb?
Qq-te 1111111C11 011 ';1- N -
-miw uq'I!:"- 0I -jix PMUv-,I! �ijjgo jrim.mqwc,,
!;I,,,
iw,jj,r.flqpr(j
- I.t W, llfi vw% boubt p"mpga ;Uq DUN umpy nw;Q10Te �ifxj t, c.;t1vtorp sr[ 41!��
'!Ip!t j!cm
1111r.1,
nUqq"qxq py. TV
po1l1:q1!'jw 70q -M! 1proq invanwava "fit" 't1eGT1WF Myee
if•%qjMHp?q PnWpl tQq M LOdbIQ 06:MW U41 1=1
iyum: ;Iptes" qhqvmjqn�•h-,k'q!c. WaI 'L'ji'tj 44 V Fil"Ij,
ve ul"WAG! fool 9 1APIMM QU?jvvfLpfwj pluph MM yr !UTQVqucq inul tau yu?,
"whM.
qn e pa Own 0" 19C COOK, Ila Ws IM Th

In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections far all cut slopes must be
provided on the mine map(s).
The maximum slope within the pit excavation will be 1 1/2 :1 in unconsolidated overburden
with a 20-foot wide safety bench at the rock/unconsolidated overburden interface. See attached
drawings as well as previously approved plans for detailed sections.
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
At the Raleigh Quarry, the slope in hard rock has historically been l with no bench. This
vlo„n has I-- adequate t11ro,�re1, �i�4 41— 1—+ter.. ^-r+u:i 4— •L..-..�..«....:a ' 1..+:....i., ....:1:
2.a.v v ua v�.va1 wua.�uuLa. Wl1 VLL�,IIVU4 1.11%, 1"OLV1 V Vl L1UJ J11.G. j1ni,G L"v, u%,Fv lL Ij 1-1LLL1VV1y U1111V11(1
n does not have a tendency to slide. It is typical of our operations currently to leave a 15' wide
safety bench every 35' of vertical height. See attached drawings as well as previously approved
plans for detailed sections.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
Hanson has always used the most modern mining methods in existence to insure the safety of its
employees and neighbors. Sufficient buffers or passive use areas are left to minimize the impact of
excavations on adjoining properties and structures.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
Access to the property itself is restricted by gates and cables that are kept locked when the quarry
is not in operation. Much of the perimeter is fenced. Berms and overburden disposal areas also block
access to much of the site and inactive highwalls. During the life of the quarry, barricades of either
oversized rock or concrete are used adjacent to active highwalls and are relocated as the pit is developed.
-10-

s •

Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes No X How will acid water
pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10, a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or
other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine maps) and provide cross -
sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
The Raleigh Quarry presently has a combination of well -developed visual barrier berms as well as
natural vegetation which screens this site well from adjoining roads and properties. This screening will be
maintained.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
1'V o - uUmay owned pant, forest, or recreation area adj Dins the ruuet$h Quarry. i ne site is weii-
screened from the Neuse River and the quarry has little or no impact on this significant watercourse.
11. Will explosives be used? Yes __ _ X__ No . If yes, specify the types ofexplosive(s) and
describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical hazard to persons or neighboring property
from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations, Depending on the mine's location to
nearby structures, more detailed technical information ma be required on the blasting progam (such as
a third-Partyblasting study). Locate the nearest oyite occupied structures) to the proposed
excavation(s) on the mine map and indicate its approximate distance to the proposed excavation.
Ensign Bickford or comparable nonel blast initiation system is used to prevent inadvertent blast
initiation especially during possible thunderstorms. An electronic initiation system may be substituted for
the novel system if it is deemed a better overall system. Weather conditions are monitored continuously
before, durin#, and after loading of each shot to insure that the shot will not be initiated under adverse
weather conditions that might cause blast emissions to drift in an unacceptable direction or might prevent
proper venting of the blast wave away from adjoining properties. ANFO premixed powder is used in dry
holes. A cap -sensitive high explosive emulsion is used for wet holes and initiation of the ANFO.
Since blastin8 is an intejgral part of this operation, each blast is monitored with a seismograph to
insure that peak particle velocities and peak overpressures are within limits established by local, state, and
fi_riataa aiithnritiPc i-Xart-nn tunrlr�arin�iv vcrith n„nng�wltant� (1„s,�911y Viirr�ferh) to rnnmtnr �nr� rn'nMnv each
blast and the seismograph recording,. �ilon with the seismograph results, fragmentation and fly rock
conditions are constantly monitored and the blasting program, including direction of blasting, hole sue and
pattern, stemming, etc. are adjusted as needed to insure best and safest results.

lmw� MMMMI
L;
COON: up% "M 0LYQvQw ff Wn qQ
:0), tZicya, qqq BUY 1:0! 1 (,'.1 pl.
Demo to. W', 1.1 !#T,"!f 41
un P ennsc JUN suQ-0 p.- • if.� j; C; 1,1-j
u,i{}I- dAin1"I1010,, "10 btaw wwlUy"cWhApic Anl p1PAQ1Puwq1pf.q
;.,AZ I-%., ko� IM01, wl ThivvyK, " , W
UMMY�Loh AkIUWK Q fm
:MW de!0 WIN OL RACMING RL PM41 CL WWUN 190 00M
jr, to WAIT �!4, �j i p �,; I tr I f I .-- I
WIGHM, WK! 111 T 110 PIP IV& ey pupar nowl n!.!Ir n!
1,fi ,- jpQj, 0! OCIARigm Ulan
Lo�fip. :10U 1)�ftl I',' I j!,W jllf�
I;"l Mr, t 1! j.i,fie.k,j-I.
0 vwRmRu% AvK
1. kli� s�l n�., tv, !.V. 01t13 VM 1"'16),. �1 kliV.,
- 00 hm M.
0 0

12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
Indicate the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Onsite storageOf" diesel Fi.nl rrna� +i L 1s d ' a.
vaauaw arvaca8v va uivava Suva, ���liia4, R►Eu ra![Vus Vll�7 a1LU greases tj rleLG3j�l� LV 1AV711LALG LLLG
operation of various equipment needed to mine and process crushed stone aggregates. The bulls storage
tanks for diesel fuel, gasoline, and oils are in approved above ground storage tanks which are located
inside secondary concrete containment in accordance with federal regulations. Any major spill or leak
from these tanks would be contained within this structure. A new 20,000-oallon double -wall diesel tank is
planned. Greases and other oils not required in bulls quantities are stored in S.5-gallon drums either in the
containment areas or at least on covered concrete slabs where possible. An oiUwater separator is located
at the shop and servicin area through which petroleum contaminated water from equipment washingg and
servicing is passed for decontamination. Used oil is collected from equipment and picked up for offsite
recycling by properly certified haulers. Empty grease and oil barrels are also returned to the sup her or
cleaned and placed into the recycle steel bin for disposal. All employees are trained on a regular basis in
the proper handling of petroleum products, managing and cleaning up spills, and proper disposal of rags,
absorbent materials, and any contaminated soils.
-12-

tip"(41('1511 Wt` jf-ljel
Ne" Tic nf-,tA
jj-oiQ ,
vr -j fl.i�� Ir .Of�, i:; cpI '/11c,
t'I CII11apmo.1
T.(:C AGI ill' , i ji,14 IAO!Y;Q' M.04f€ Cj 4-MLPG 116(1 011 Pr U�+ 5;�( 512?) to kVC 210A3I1'.1. 01.
�P-l. qLWO1 (Al C"imbl."Ic'ut 5'J"j, birvt'l rb of
ut f1jr, po
c.e)JI'm I 1jipci it 01. 44,; 1 *IJ 1:� COLCI G 4 "."prm; 0 "A. '?r b,; u'i" 0 oc U" VT
'u.-an? :lvq rqvi. oij? v*( mdfw,", pi pril". dWlill0iirloe 111V-
jrul,
(IMP Vsl(j Wj� 111V, 1--i 'ibbivtr'q lfrxmc- u 1,�w(
1 4 = I I
oIjc4VUri(10 I... r'M 16,-ii Corn b;)'.' i;nr f --i ic tm 5Ai bt, 1,0 "VI'Al ;1 Ci ZILCOS'14' Pt-w P, i Ij? "v'v(V4,*
w 1.144P O'k AV, I , I? Vlc!jlfil;r� iilrl
m
k)%I'- VYI.V,11$011�-��ytrt"k,11W
0 0

•
0
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or
establishment of any permanent dr ' gge channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other
pollution. This information must beeiillustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with
The information provided on the mine map(s). In addition, design information, including typical
crass -sections, of any permanent chanmels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the
locations) of all permanent channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
The mine excavation will be allowed to fill by ground water and storm water runoff from adjoining
areas once the mining operation is completed. The resulting deep -water lake will be used for recreation,
and potentially as a fresh water supply for local utilities. The plant site, stockpile areas, and overburden
disposal areas will be waded and seeded with grasses suitable for establishment of grasslands and wildlife
areas. Process and pit water settling ponds and sediment basins will be filled and similarly reclaimed to
grasslands unless they are part of the overall final site drainage and reclamation plan.
See attached drawings for specific details.
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes . -_ 2j_ No
if yes, illustrate the location of the body(s of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed holy(s) of water. The minimum water depth must beat least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site. Will the body(s) of water be stocked with
fish? Yes No X . If yes, specify species,
It is Hanson's intent to convert the quarry into a fresh water take upon cessation of mining
activities. In addition, stormwater ponds 1 and 2 as shown on the attached drawings will remain.
See attached drawings for specific details and cross -sections.
Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent buricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, a#c. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
As a safety precaution, a 20-foot wide safety bench will be left at the rock/unconsolidated soil
interface. A permanent fence will be erected around the completed quarry to prevent unauthorized entry
and d-..ger -,.— __ be pl. at re�.!ar .::ter;f u along the fence to `TV"&Is VA. V&S Vp:.rl pK.
-13-

ivvl gt1t;fi';!, 21, Lei 1. f,i Y& 1)ifiCf;ti'11 i!;iTflEf;l, ii4cIJ`mjj {rjliU �'i1G jt•lirt', 1#0 fe'iL71 04Ii1r, 01'1F`:I: b!f
�!r eu tj. ] m;affIE!w,. iY "{t riot tP l we'll ll }I ucp rh! 1 PG 16 3 IN i111
1y S;:►.1i::}tVi! `tT k-n k?( '1+` iti's.;l AS!> ''i 1r. �.F,C,liil:iC;ist+i;i }'l A).
Lr" }cF:l1 `" ')rF r.,. rt"i"f f 1 ri ',iC it { 1♦ . }�\1i1;.t C t;; !. `0. rk i;r ( IZ + {}4 r^
�iilif' E � €�, li a � 3�-.3 •�r. t � tip .;}`t Esl �� �1•. � il;.}i.! t}� ,1� �....� k; }.,a;t,
' f; ! t!S" '1 !; i7C:;, 1;� !3r! ';:T! c i r l: ! t Jc. !ram !C _'F;�J;S If t)� 1 i r lSf;l3• �i G.{C � !s! t,'.; Yrll 1; t"
,1! ;ir 4� , ; • F):!t �',i:', t. r .; . ;� #r �c ; !{ .Er i , "�3� � :ut ! �,) * E., r.l.t -t� ;}�L ►;
,r•+l t• a '1 S r: ' !. : ?r• , t•rf Y , 'l: rl! �;! ♦ {•
�:r •wEr,A 1i) �:t;; ),i�' tIC� 1! ;ttlC?t! 1)C• t.E.C'��,[j<', f1; .tr ri?�..i?i,(:;;rt f.:'. :r''{3..�.1t. !;3 3.,;;.,f
:fa wryepq ipst`::!]& tot �,€.)f"'.IUc fl.",i'.it�; uuq C.ir?�`-:3t;Gi:s:r.fi
ti
�fC1i1'lfl+=C 4T) ;Yt�tl:j!{ii: F:ll�i.iF3{:•'3fF; i}r371:�i: E ::llici � :i:i �1'1FFls :j'.i f!?f, ^tk;tf_`E;C;�E i?t;;;� 3i1i:"•^. ';..it€ l.:^�!fidfl
;j ! i?'flii?tiff r 1.{:�tlf tr) t.�.'JieTl.i fps `ir_lyid pmn U 40"1 .P:'; i�� L ji pc ttiMU t;=::!"�!q00 ,J't_ t..i.�ff;3 l
i ,
UAL hap—
`i;•is.ta v qj pGi Wi tifpam exit !'s•`u cw! 2c Qu op 1 ; Cl if.'.i}� r:7fir'#t74 s+:C'1 rl'tjit
.•r a ! V ;� � : It�i: r� �! L i .# � { �) t .iS il:1 f � i!, tydl' 1:1 '� #' L': hiir• j ; � 3rJ� l.r.Ci'"4 7r31i °r A J:.11 d
3 .,. F 1 ,i '.t Y Y k art 'v ''+ ,j,j• . ii.;#l3;1.,11 ], �1.. t .. t:} ae fJ !i� !`r,'I �:'v :!„ 3t._',,.1 ci �. •*,
its Ycan}t wi Ok vtsCs IiJl'!i"kA,
€' :331 cL 11+'f: }fTf;'- r yC}q}, ,.;_ N.!i.n it; i";F:. If;�
;:c:T:• f:�t ; }!^zt .I# :Fir' i'J`t:; t �i. �!,if; �3€)r C€r.(c1i:•,
tIlJ(:ri::'wf.h r}t,o €iu!.S )� s Jir wavy E iil'; t!!r #},:JS: :� r c"
r t I'#F, fit. !: ,t::1.1 13,r !(?l? i?j3il3
:)It•,'J;t, €,?t>702 WJEJ i7lf If,tIKE. ?r4f1,1rt bnv:1� f!1!ft 1;-,q!!,'wuj f1$i:tlia2 v4i iar; Ff�a+;C7 f!`Cj :+!tlr:! i'.1 . LG.•:'.t':11i!l4ri1 ;rl
ay3 r ' r S ;i:rC' ;! �E-t.`-3r .=;a,try l�fr 1' i`+' Ct rf lif,:#�7„li;Ct •ISC N.! "til t;
;.,fit :r1EE,rs�; :i�'.'u :��,1}!cE 1 �.,t; r><,! .! •!} ,��.. �'f �€ o�l.ii if 4. , # �''1s.�
7
r�
,Rf n,: ; WC& fL}r !o!f aR r1 rLS1'5M § C;i)111F��r jCA i j €.;! i.t i�{iiri5 f�f:r;:S}•:t:::{!1'i ifr::� I, NJ PC r6�'.nq #f)!. ! :«tif'3lf. !!'
}•r' E 1 r „�:ll/ ! r;� ;#1,:f; rts„rf,33 .l�.r r''1 es iI' et tf t 1
.;.. .liF: �. .. Tir;)!1 lriE: ,! ={E} �'1�•.+•:� l�C� tl�i asl, :;lr.!! :t€ i;:..
r'
10.k d1i 0,11;i t ;+} }e} w% wVV`,4':}r:V is+' ?. �1 is14C.i!` i% k), i ! 1.; r %IN; rli ! VAt
P:ttivV it F'.r• r t s: t, ;'r. Ct,'r f±'.•:[�:,''.it t.! t 1; ;l,C
.:,_.t'1:1.^ 'y►t_ } . •.s� . i • i, ,1. .,Ir ,+ .IL 1',�1 15) E"'. .1 1 f!, ,1 }.1 � 1� ,
!�'•,rrlrin;, pze!'1 �!+'A}ti;I;:.tli,!ill.! :};4:'1: Y:t, t!ti;'1�+':tlttt'1!;+�1C�.1.j:11•il+'y'�.t;!'.1`.1t'?ttiii'��#}1:i'+��C',f;L.3.f.�}2i�!41"t�6=i}':.C.:1�j.:E.1ti`IC
C,c.r�;2�i2t3kS1ft t 01 t1s;;L;.1.,USUI gLM!#,'I,., •'„ !3 1 ,A.1:: ,ii o l +gint; iAii,#,.i135tit ci.o- }Cr?i' Qjp,-; r
LfT,=i!1'tt2111t `1' .',:r:j#!lit; !3t1i1i } !Y3,ZE'rl ?c`r`�)1ii�Eii {ti1ilii'+€ R } !]1? 'lllft iiC ilj!;j�.i�f! ttj 3.Ci.:itil.;;1.13] C)?.
�k3', r'ri[i;t{:23r;r �'1.!t� i1:iil2+r•:}1 !_E rgjr}{t7' fis €,i; i aml !v 1 at: !•=)1 ,i,'' q; i i { ijIr !1igf1q-4 !p1 l;Srl�}rjtl f!f
tf ��.,. -r r c •!• r,: i' i'r r' t!�f, i yi [ r'•I .ram 1. 1..
x r%• .:.lCr i `T}i t 3j':i._�&:� r.,i! �Cir klt s lit3"!€ fff.E.f 1y:11 tfl:r •t�i!'ri.i(. f�,, rt; f#p.v:C1., Et;!ki tt::# lklf�:t .3t ,
0 0

9 0
Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, snail banks or other such on -site mine waste
areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for such areas
must be provided on the reclamation map,
A ..arl.,,..ie„ :., wln.._A :« A....:.«..4 A '� :_ _—_ s ___ L-- --- ----I !-- -i _.
rw v r V{ vul uGi! to XC&%,Vu 11! UV3L8l1LLLGLI &LUI13, 1L 13 blA eaU tULU W111pdVLVU UT. UVLCI ZUIU Uaiul Iu1u6S.
Slopes in waste areas will be graded to 2:1 or flatter and revegetated as soon as possible to prevent erosion.
Erosion control measures and runoff conveyances will be established as the waste area develops and then
maintained throughout the process until final reclamation is achieved. Drainage on top of waste areas will be
established to prevent pooling and stagnation of water and to control stormwater runoff. Final reclamation of
waste areas will include final top and slope dressing as required followed by seeding in accordance with the
revegetation plan included herein.
See attached drawings for specific details.
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
Reclamation in these areas will occur as follows. First, the product stockpiles will be sold down.
Then the processin plant will be dismantled and removed from the site. Any remaining piles, waste piles,
and areas graded for plarn layout and operation will be graded to 2:1 maximum slope (generally 3:1 or
flatter). Finally these areas will be scarified and seeded according to the revegetation plan. Any site access
roads not utzed in the end use development plan will be treated in the same manner.
Any erosion control structures in these areas to be incorporated into the end use development of the
site will be cleaned out and left in good working condition.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X� No . Ifyes, identify
such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent ditch line stabilization.
Main paved roads into existing stone processing plant area and asphalt plant area will remain for access
and future development purposes. Road from upper plant level down to lower basin level behind shop will
remain and will be graded (including side drainage ditches) and stabilized with rock.
Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables, or other
such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971). No �e
generated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without ri r written approval from the
Department o Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality and either the Division of
Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit has been issued by DWM
for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application. All temporary and permanent
refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated on the mine map(s) and reclamation map, along with a list
of items to be disposed in said areas.
As previously approved, temporary scrap and used equipment storage areas have been developed at this
ai+n i'hn was+nraal e.aA dA + la. ai. la♦e 1+ C...:..:...,, A 'w.. ..s' �:.....
JaLV. i {1V J41f{F! 4{7LiiV11GU GUna Y.7a.'1/ W�,1u,11jli!{yilL Yvan%OZA QWL%11111L06. a3 a repUIL of alullLlL1$ CUJU pg V%A s nllg aLilV1L1GJ
are stored in these areas until sold to an independent recycler. No process waste products other than inert
granite fines are disposed of at the site.
A scrap metal bin is maintained on site for disposal by recycling of small metal scrap. Tires are recycled
through the various tire suppliers.
—14—

p+L {If 4r-I.- I i I i rJ. :'a L1, "L;>
2.1,111ilt, i,r-, i1j,"If 1p'�
qJ.c,! ,-G •OMwjM Uqtxcijqri-j�!11jMnqqpH10.1
:,;r, 1h. 1j;!,wjq guq p7r.(7 1, UZI IM 0 MMI SP U LOW q! U!,0!fliA SIA!
w and, I nil (x1j; f.-.1 1,�v! "el pul!; pc C-1; al.
k41 '413',WI VIqVJ) kiS,Ak l I'll i(
too. (tic, ob! fRap! 01011 lans ps Ntucyou to Ipta uhipcUp'tw -1I1,
imaq P1 IV I 11
a Uq pin"! g9powl me I I" q (forpi) gtq I �.] IF till
wimpq JAmic alluji Is qjAymy apu op SqOG mm apponj TWO 0 Sam Shrom; ;pm
qC,�',P s.!iJU A MUG R1 J �ic -'I
01. -. r, 4) 1 - ":,.
'cly5al VIP! iyj ion wqqnq i isicy.
prtipiq q.,wh nil
�s- "jul ulk amp bra NO rm 1riumu A wns
193 V I
JI'A ,'MN PA CPMX41 cm will J, lij
Gf9pol QMpAse !U Str.,j, ff-1 P(, !1,,q,-) jpn, rtiv, ff?� V
may mr mmp lu pin spq FMA tIAMplAhm Q1 Nin pr arwq pi wo wao unews
MY6 0 uaq eacqaq swvpm go Igo t,pO. a!jn t.4cmx,
Im qual Isonq nq normnau hjH pa Taqvq it) ?job-,
jp-m 1p rpovAl
100100A ID fw at mme m m 14c"k 1, um"Sp glee It 1/ (111), -�(,yl qwm.,,
.. a jr,051 minswinu Qn,cospiv PCM400 y"Qqc mw , uaq -anyrc 100qvwx
jo wmrpq mptlunks
I; I,
swuppepoo 01 bif A&A mcm 11-q 10 GQ%L.�!
fwwar Inyx Inam a -I! �jqca Iti I in4c-A�1; 1,,WWj01Jiq
1 Ulm pagwy hvwq lu yQuilaq T out' if I •w1miq Ivq vv�,�, joq M!0
411 0

•
0
7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for ear -round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and type of
seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding instructions
for permanent revegetation and, if necessary, temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree
plantings is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources,
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, specialists
and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest Resources at
North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department ofEnvironment
and Natural Resources;
f. N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual:
gg N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre):
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre).
SEED - TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Seed Types: Seedinp-Dates: Seedinp. Rates:
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF ANCHORING:
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS - TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, treestacre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
RG V egGlatlon and! or r G1Ur ertafion plan approved by:
Signature Date
Print Name
Title
Agency
SEE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REVEGETATION
-16-
PLAN DATED 8-16-91.

� �
t - . t
t �
� � � - � � �
�
� •
1 .
� ,
� l
�
f � ,

E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be used to establish an appropriate bond (based upon a range
of $500 to $5, 000 per affected acre) for each permitted mine site based upon the acreage approved by the
Department to be affected during the life of the miningpermil. Please insert the approximate acreage, for each
AFFECTED RECLAMATION RECLAMATION
CATEGORY ACREAGE COST/ACRE* COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds: Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Stockpiles: Ac. X $ /Ac. - $
Wastepiles: Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Processing Area/Haul Roads: Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Mine Excavation: Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
Other: Ac. X $ /Ac. _ $
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.: Ac.
(TOTAL PERMITTED AC.: Ac.)
Temnorary & Permanent Sedimentation & Erasion. Control Measures:
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existing excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be &railed for positive drainage where measures will be
needed to prevent offsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsite watercourses and wetlands.
a) Internal Drainage Ac.
b) Positive Drainage Ac. X $1,500.00 = $
SUBTOTAL COST: $
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: $ X Permit Life (Ito 10 years):
INFLATION COST: $
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COST + INFLATION COST = S
Total Reclamation Bond Cost: $
(round down to the nearest $100.0(
COVERED UNDER EXISTING HANSON A GGREGA TES SOUTHEAST
-17-

41

0
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as
may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G
74-59,
LANDOWNER:
Signature:
Print Name:
Address:
APPLICANT:
Signature: *
Print Name:
Title:
Company:
Telephone: Mine Name:
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
SEFzEREVl SAYS =ffiD L&VD JE TRYAA REEMEN�T'S
;ems. sing fee (see neat page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order
lepartment of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to the I n
at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at (919)
733-4574.
Mac

U.,-. !"loi: in t! I �, %rrliT rW 1. i t�.i If, r fi if-.! I T!4,tj ji I(. �f J)4;
fo I,
ioc Wrjqw,�? p."jrGEj Olt 1p" mmrz. r)j {I.m.
, -p. 1,501 "'JI,{MAJ rMPI W& OJif (1)
I1
-,
?-T; MCI i-frf, —.1gi 7n MIN jeC, 0.20 IYA�*,fr ffil, J(.Ir. 4f.jl (.�j I e;,O III t 10. WMIJF I; f;1101f41 OK L11 I )ijc. T.) jq C.
Toutle, 1V COMM) F, 7AZI
W.V il-De5V;i,
( f"'Mimm., . . . . ... .1 - -- — . .-- - .
/ i"M I K " Irf 143,11
1 Vr V f -W,:F I o f-If v ul d". o 4 v ; iqllf C, V 1 11 Q11, It ') r Q "i i? fl,.414� I t�f� Of ko
•i L
VIM il", 1111,11 Pl� Vp '4
ii . 13ti; (t(. q;', 4A )omtilfl Lo-.1 E c ;/A t I(, J- t. L'I If (4) MrF11- cpllii.W,t O;i 4,.
01
U'r. t.1 f;t T,4(1 blAl j1.'.'Arj '41 RA U. o':'Ofjf'
I" V ifirst T'. X.; Kit. V , 10"F l!"; 1 'E"A L
1* 0

' Kink/ 7 ti :^n�
i , t �A?:SFi.rlt_.�.o :Ttr jl {� j ic11Nl
n0117U11 M1 jY1U C L'Vb 000U ICc15l, If 1U.
Raleigh Quarry
Erosion and Sediment Control Design Calculations
for
Mine Permit #92-02 Renewal
November 25, 2002
Submitted to
N. C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
November, 2002
g9a�ae�ae:ozrit
a°
s �
•i •
s� � /kcI Ni-.••'• �.
'4z.. CN F. r` :.0'
Prepared by.
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Fnvimnmiantni r.nnMinatnr
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, S.C. 29520
843-537-7883

Table of Contents
Section I - Calculate design runoff flow from northern plant area
contributory to stormwater pond #1 below shop - Page 1 of 10
Section II - Size culvert to carry storm flow under overburden area
to stormwater pond #1 - Page 2 of 10
Section III - Calculate design runoff flow from plant and stockpile
area contributory to stormwater pond #2 below stockpile
area - Page 3 of 10
Section IV - Size slope drain to cant' runoff from plant and stockpile
area to stormwater pond #2 below stockpile area - Page 4 of 10
Section V - Calculate design flow from area immediately south of
shop contributory to stormwater pond #2 below stockpile
area - Page 5 of 10
Section VI - Size slope drain to carry runoff from area immediately
south of shop to stormwater pond #2 below stockpile
area - Page 6 of 10
Section Vll - Calculate design runoff flow from overburden disposal
area southwest of shop contributory to stormwater pond
#1 below shop - Page 7 of 10
Section VIII - Size slope drain to cant' runoff from overburden disposal
area southwest of shop to stormwater pond #1 below
shop - Page 8 of 10
Section IX - Design rip -rap lined spillway discharge from stormwater
pond #1 below shop - Page 9 of 10
Section X - Design rip -rap lined spillway discharge from stormwater
pond #2 below stockpile area - Page 10 of 10

•
u
ri . 1 0 F 10
i. Calculate design runoff flow from norrhem plant area contributory to
stormwater pond #9 below shop
A. — Base informg ion for Peak Rgnol7 Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 13.5 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 2500'
% hydraulic length modified — 60%
Average slope = +/- 3.8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+1 1 acres ponded throughout watershed) = 14:1
Soil Group "Bn
Similar to dirt or gravel street, or cultivated land w/o conservation — CN = 85
However, most of area is covered by stonelsand stockpiles and/or top foot or two is
highly permeable due to stockpile base remaining. Adjust CN to 70 (cultivated land
with conservation)
Plant site = 9.5 Acs. (70%)
Open space, grass cover >75% - = 2.0 Acs. (15%)
Paved streets with curbs = 2_0 Acs. 1( 5
13.5 Acs. 100%
B. — Calculation of Peak Discha i
1) Calculate average curve number
Plant site
Open space, grass cover >75%
Paved streets with curbs
using Table 8.03b.
_ % Area x CN
70% x 70 =
4900
15% x 61 =
915
'f px 98 =
1470
100% =
7285
Avg. CN = 7286/100 = 73
2) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr storm north of Raleigh = 6.4 In.
From Table 8.03c, by interpolation, runoff depth = 3.52 in.
3) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 25001:
equivalent drainage area = 60 acres
From Figure 8.03o, 3%-8% slope, CN=73, 60 acs: Peak rate of runoff = 27.0 cfs/inch
Q, = 27.0 cfsrnch x 3.52 inches = 95 cis
% = 95 ds x 13.5 Acsl60Acs = 21.4 cis
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Qs for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modifed -
From Figure 8.03r, 60% modified and CN=73: Factor = 1.42

•
•
ZnFra
Q3=21.4cfsx1.42=30.4cfs
5) Adjust peak discharge rate Q3for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 3.8% average slope, 13.5 acres:
adjustment factor = 0.99
Qa = 30.4 x 0.99 = 30.1 cfs
5) Adjust peak discharge QA for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 14:1, throughout are, 25-yr..
Adjustment factor = 0.68
Gip 25.24 = 30.1 cfs x 0.68 = 20.5 cfs
Il - Size Culvert to CaMi %orm Flow Under Overburden Area to Stormwater, Pond #1
Available grade = 0.9% (5' drop in +/- 550')
Using RCP pipe (n = 0.013)
a 24" culvert will carry +/-22 cfs at 0.9% grade. > 20.5 cfs - okl
Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total HL = H, + Hv + Hi = (V212g )(k, + 1 + ((29n2L)/R'-n)
where, k, = 0.5 for factory -supplied flared inlet
V = Q/A W 20.5 cfs/(7r)(1.0ft)2, mean velocity flowing lull
= 6.5 fps
R = A/WP = (7c)(1.0 ft)2 / (27c)(1.0 ft) = 0.5 pipe flowing full
Total HL = (42.25184.4)(0.5 + 1 + ((29)(0.013)2 (550)) / (0.5)'-33 = 5.4'
Available H = HW -- TW = 237 - 228.5 = 8.5' > 5.4' OKl (flow capacity will be greater than
20.5 cfs as indicated above)
Outlet Vei. = Vo = (1.486/n)(R)2o (S)" 2 = (1.48610.013)(0.0.5) 23 (0.009) "
= 6.8 fps

• •
R;- 3 oFir)
/it. Calculate design runoff flow from plant and stockpile area contributory to
stormwater pond #2 below stockpile area
A. - Base Information for Peak Runoff Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 28 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 1200'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 0.8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-2 acres ponded throughout watershed) =14:1
Soil Group "B"
Similar to dirt or gravel street, or cultivated land w/o conservation - CN = 85
However, most of area is covered by stone/sand stockpiles and/or top foot or two is
highly permeable due to stockpile base remaining. Adjust CN to 70 (cultivated land with
conservation)
B. - Calculation of Peak Discharge Rate for the Contributing Drainage Area
1) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr. storm north of Raleigh = 6.4 in.
From Table 8.03c, by interpolation, runoff depth = 3.13 in.
2) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 1200':
equivalent drainage area = IS acres
From Figure 8.03o, 0%-3% slope, CN=70, 18 acs: Peak rate of runoff = 10.0 Winch
Q, = 10.0 cfstinch x 3.13 inches = 31.3 cfs
(:6 = 31.3 cfs x 28 Acs/18Acs = 48.7 cfs
3) Adjust peak discharge rate Q2 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Q3 for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 0.8% average slope, 28 acres:
adjustment factor = 0.93
Qa=48.7x0.93=45.3cfs -
5) Adjust peak discharge Wor surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 14:1, throughout are, 25-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.69
Or, zep,, = 45.3 cfs x 0.69 = 31�

•
Pr .4-„Fro
IV. Size slope drain to carry runoff from plant and stockpile area to stormwater
pond #2 below stockpile area
Using corrugated plastic pipe, n= 0.020, slope = 286'-227'/220' = 0.27 ft/ft or 27%
Try 24". Per Manning formula (flowing full):
Q = A (1.49/n)(R 2"3)(S "2)
= (rr)(1.0')2(1.49/0.020)((n)(1.0')2/(2n)(1.0')) 213 (0,27)'"
=76.5cfs>31.2cfs OK
Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total HL = H. + Hv + H, = (V2/ 2g )(kg + 1 + ((29n2Q/R1-33))
where, ks = 0.9 for submerged inlet, rip rap headwall
V = Q/A = 31.2 cfs/(7e)(1.0 ft)2, mean velocity flowing full
= 9.9 fps
R = A/WP = (n)(1.0 ft)2 / (27c)(1.0 ft) = 0.5' pipe flowing full
Total Ht = (98/64.4)(0.9 + 1 + ((29)(0.020)2 (220)) / (0.5)'-33 = 12.6'
Available H (submerged inlet at full flow) = HW — TW = 286 — 227 = 59' > 12.6' OKI (Plow
capacity will be > 31.2 cfs required. Another iteration shows that an 18" would have too
much head loss to pass the 31.2 cfs at full flow.)
USE Standard 24" corrugated plastic culvert for slope drain
Outlet Vel. = Vo = (1.49/n)(R)2"j (S)1"2 = (1.49/0.020)(0.5) 23 (0,27)''
= 24.1 fps Will need outlet protection. Install 10' x10' x 3' thick rip
rap (d50 size = 18") apron with filter fabric undedayment at pipe outlet, surface elevation =
226.

•
(Pk. S F r a
V. Calculate design runoff flow from area immediately south of shop
contributory to stormwater pond #2 below stockpile area
A. - Base Information for Peak Runoff Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 4 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 550'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 0.8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-0.25 acres ponded throughout watershed) = 16:1
Soil Group "B"
Similar to dirt or gravel street, or cultivated land w/o conservation — CN = 85
However, most of area is covered by stonetsand stockpiles and/or top foot or two is
highly permeable due to stockpile base remaining. Adjust CN to 70 (cultivated land with
conservation)
B. — Calculation of Peak Discharae Rate for the Contributina Drainage Area
1) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr. storm north of Raleigh = 6.4 in.
From Table 8.03c, by interpolation, runoff depth = 3.13 in.
2) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 550':
equivalent drainage area = 5 acres
From Figure 8.03o, 0%-3% slope, CN=70, 5 acs: Peak rate of runoff = 4.5 cfslinch
Q, = 4.5 Winch x 3.13 inches = 14.1 cfs
Q2 = 14.1 cfs x 4 Acs/5Acs = 11.3 cfs
3) Adjust peak discharge rate 02 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
Ql Adjust neak dk&arne rate 0, for average watershed slnne
From Table 8.03d, 0.8% average slope, 4 acres:
adjustment factor = 0.93
04= 11.3x0.93= 10.5ds;
5) Adjust peak discharge Q4 for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 16:1, throughout are, 25-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.69
Qp 25.24 = 10.5 cfs x 0.69 = 7.2 cfs

P&'r P d F r_v
in. Size slope drain to carry runoff from area immediately south of shop to
stormwater pond #2 below stockpile area
Using corrugated plastic pipe, n= 0.020, slope = 286'-227'/220' = 0.27 ft/ft or 27%
Try 15". Per Manning formula (flowing full):
Q = A (1.49/n)(R 23)(S 1l2)
= (n)(0.625')2(1.49/0.020)((ic)(0.625')2/(27c)(0.625')) 2m (0.27)1/2
= 21.9 cfs > 7.2 cfs OK
Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total Hi = Ha + Hv + H, = (V2/ 2g )(k, + 1 + ((29n2L)/R'-n)
where, k, = 0.9 for submerged inlet, rip rap headwall
V = Q/A = 7.2 cfs/(n)(0.625ft)2, mean velocity flowing full
= 5.9 fps
R = A/WP = (7c)(0.625 ft)2 / (2n)(0.625 ft) = 0.312' pipe flowing full
Total Ht, = (34.8/64.4)(0.9 + 1 + ((29)(0.020)2 (220)) / (0.312)1•33 = 13.03
Available H (submerged inlet at full flow) = HW — TW = 286 — 227 = 59' >13.0 OKI (Flow
capacity will be > 7.2 cfs required. Another iteration shows that a 12" would have too much
head loss to pass the 7.2 cts at full flow.)
USE Standard 16" corrugated 21astic culvert for slope drain
Outlet Vel. = Vo = 0.49/n)(R)2o (S)'n = (1.49/0.020)(0.312) 2'3 (0.27) "
= 17.8 fps Will need outlet protection. Install 8' x8' x 3' thick rip rap
(d50 size = 18") apron with filter fabric undedayment at pipe outlet, surface elevation = 226.

9 0
e'
WI. Calculate design runoff flow from overburden disposal area southwest of
shop contributory to stormwater pond #1I below shop
A. — Base Information for Pe k Runoff Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 3.5 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 400'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 0.8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-0.25 acres ponded throughout watershed) = 14:1
Soil Group "B"
Similar to dirt or gravel street, or cultivated land w/o conservation — CN = 85
However, most of area is covered by stone/sand stockpiles and/or top foot or two is
highly permeable due to stockpile base remaining. Adjust CN to 70 (cultivated land with
conservation)
B. — Calculation of Peak DischaEge Rate o the CoEadbuting Drainage Area
1) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr. storm north of Raleigh = 6.4 in.
From Table 8.03c, by interpolation, runoff depth = 3.13 in,
2) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 400':
equivalent drainage area = 3 acres
From Figure 8.03o, 0%-3% slope, CN=70, 3 acs: Peak rate of runoff = &0 cfslinch
Q, = 3.0 cfs/inch x 3.13 inches = 8.39 -.--fS.
% = 9.39 cfs x 3.5 Acs/3Acs = 11.0 cfs
3) Adjust peak discharge rate Q2 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Q3 for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 0.8% average slope, 3.5 acres:
adjustment factor = 0.93
Q.= 11.0x0.93= 10.2cfs
5) Adjust peak discharge 04 for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 16:1, throughout are, 25-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.69
Qp 26,24 = 10.2 cfs x 0.69 = 7.1 cfs

f`�-8,r(0
r
Vlll. Size slope drain to carry runoff from overburden disposal area southwest
of shop to stormwater pond #9 below shop
Using corrugated plastic pipe, n= 0.020, slope = 286'-228/280' = 0.21 ft/ft or 21 %
Try 15". Per Manning formula (flowing full):
Q = A (1.49/n)(R 25)(S'n)
= (n)(0.625')2(1.49/0.020)((7c)(0.625')z/(2,n)(0.625'))2rj(0.21)1rz
= 19.3 cis > 7.1 cfs OK
Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total HL = 1-ie + Hv + Hf = CV212g )(1r, + 1 + ((29n2QiR'-33))
where, ke = 0.9 for submerged inlet, rip rap headwall
V = Q/A = 7.1 cfs/(n)(0.625ft)2, mean velocity flowing full
= 5.8 fps
R = AiWP = (7c)(0.625 ft)Z / (2n)(0.625 ft) = 0.312' pipe flowing full
Total HL = (33.8/64.4)(0.9 + 1 + ((29)(0.020)2 (280)) / (0.312)'-3 = 9.0'
Available H (submerged inlet at full flow) = HW — TVI/ = 286 — 228 = 58' > 9.0 OKI (Flow
capacity will be > 7.1 cfs required. Another iteration shows that a 12" would have too much
head loss to pass the 7.1 cfs at full flow.)
USE Standard 15" corrugated Plastic culvert for slope drain
Outlet Vel. = Vo = 0.49/n)(R)"�(S)"` = (1.49/0.020)(0.312)2"" (0.21)'�
= 15.7 fps Will not need outlet protection as pipe will be
discharging horizontally to deep water pond.

i •
OF r�
- . ��• �f%E.!/G�v IPt% �%�CINF� Sf�t�A�/ �rscHA�� F�layJ �i�1Ne�TE2 PDND "�� �i�e/ Si�o�•
�. 7�
t
a
'FOwr MIX B.OS� s� �..tt�si/.iL� u r,r Sf�2 ,SrrlEss = -. z. o
� -- • -- 7} r�llcwf �-t6u2E' B4Os� � JjETE/!.�{i+✓� C�N�L Flw �%FjOT1� .
00
o.17 ' (i sczc,;;eo Rw AoxxE 40- 1 ' }
.?) Cq Ccw U rE J 5 T&S-1;
07— Ohl, x L 2.a l5/ x,04-1 Ok'.
C.
4� --b73F04INE_
r
- - - - - - - - - ,6w -F e-w DEprti - - -- �- 'rt!►� - — - ----
-�,.c
aj
S/ i /0

cl
sn 1M1'tiL ss� sod/n'' `� .•'-- __ - " '-�;: � ; , . � r —`- -- ,, .,
,y,
JI II a6-a
Gz_= C?i s i �nP S •� =
sr�i✓��� r% rev �iuj/ ���a �nrolla l�+nw�-y� 3rY+wiA3�.3�]
•h�4 -. / -3i'0 I I/
*SIP
r
7� virc ?' 1t�`✓�/��C'' i«�T/� 3T�'d�j'�t/� .{�//�7"fid� G�j;,N2 OIV a/o/ )Vq y;gC
n7 j a n'/ • J,�

_ uOguiif.. •aar�o H°JI3ZYIF MY-�� oeEwrw F r _ _- � i ] �_� MOFa�a ts�aiw
;. jq
�—
1�A
r i
•� �.C_ t .
2F:y, i.
Its:
Y
•C, !q
�-a
r
CF{}
a;

ATTMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
Mr. Michael Hale
517 Gregmore Court
Raleigh, NC 27614
RE: Blasting Complaint
Raleigh Quarry
Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Dear Mr. Hale:
March 31, 2005
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Our office has completed its review of Hanson Aggregates' blasting information, including
blast reports and seismograph recordings, related to the blast conducted at its Raleigh Quarry
during the period of February 11, 2005 through February 24, 2005. It was found that Hanson
Aggregates was in compliance with the blasting requirements of its mining permit during the
period in question.
All peak particle velocities, a measurement of ground vibration with units in inches per
second (ips), were well below the maximum allowable limits specified in Hanson Aggregates'
mining permit. More specifically, all recorded values were at or below 0.058 ips.
All airblast readings, a measurement of the atmospheric pressure wave (overpressure) with
units in psi or dBL, were also below the maximum allowable limits specified in the mining permit
and well below the U. S. Bureau of Mines' recognized level of 164 dBL for prevention of glass
breakage. A key point worth noting is that glass breakage occurs at much lower levels of
overpressure than structural damage, such as cracking plaster.
Thank you for your interest and patience in this matter. Hopefully I have answered your
concerns adequately. If you should have any additional questions or concerns, please contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
4-���, "-V\
Kristin Hicklin
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
cc: Mr. Floyd R. Williams, PG
Mr. John Holley, PE
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612-919-733-45741 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

t, 'r
s
� �
�.

"'""_'_""'^'r+-v..=rn.-r+.��-r.+..,...w..:a�.r^�n.=....tiNl.....�+,: ` -•-�� � i ���it�,Y.l.rti ''��Y, c+k�'•`ti��,.,,d},�d^^n.�u Lr.�.:.-v�...-+af.,vr•^ P'Jai"�"'r'S."'""'�r.-..,.�r.nr..•-* m
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural P
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
(PERMITTED MINE) LI_ '
1 A.fll�TL' AT D.fr' '• ""•� '
I. lvuiv� INAlvtn�.jc;-cry,% �zf_ .L-��: (�_ 1-� f�tUfaR.,e y 2. 1'v1ll ING PERMIT # `-�i A.
3. OPERATORv-%Ao y r_s �1_A,(�C 2 �� �_ _, C�,2ca ..�,� i hC4. COUNTY
5. ADDRESS s �_> . � ��x_ 1 8 , T 2T�� � c'
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE I1- G, - 7. RIVER BASIN
8. Person(s) contacted at situ,-k (- • ,\:r
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? E • Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes Cl No
11. Date last inspected: �-1 / 3 L .ice i 12. Any mining since last inspection? ❑� �-Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? 15,Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? [.Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ©. No If yes, describe the
type and Seveg rity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
17. Other recommendations and comments:
L-1 1 i ,c' yN S'
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? 9 Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes El. No Proposed-date--
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 21. Copy of Report sent to operator
(date)
INSPECTED BY: _TVL. \N, Zc-:._t _ DATE
Telephone No: LP ► cc ) 5-4 1. ►..j�
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
(PERMITTED MINE)
,, .��,,, 1T 1 1 rT D 1 i �, G
i . lviiivr- iNtuvlr, 11 A i P. r n Vl ix vt &' V r �1 _ 2. MIN1N U PERMIT # ! v •�
3. OPERATOR Nc, Sv car as+cS` r�l mo..T 4. COUNTY In }
5. ADDRESS 14-)n CY-c.-,ce'4- i;._er\ +-e- Naljr.%/ 1�4-r. 1 a,4 T-L.c:.l�Ev, C7A z
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE Nov. 2.5 2 Do-27• RIVER BASIN e- L&s
8. Person(s) contacted at sited_ ci e i W ' 11 �'
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? El Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes "N No
11. Date last inspected: .�� I /DO 12. Any mining since last inspection? O' Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? :CAI Yes ❑ No
If no, explain: _
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑• Yes ❑ No�/�
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type armed geverity of the darnage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:-
17. Other recommendations and comments: kg ^ g I ,�,r�a ,� yy e j`S u. b f - 41 c c ' p r
r l r J GL 4 L
G>1cay. I 6P'NG +r 1 , v�f r (Neor ove�b r,lr n !� %t1�J�L,I.�C
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ,Ll Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed date I I
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Repo�-L 21. Copy of Report sent to operator_.
., .v E; ` 1141 w fit! • , c,.` -s., " r . , r- "%. �� z;c.- - !...(date)
J( 1� rrna....--.
IN PECTED BY: C <' - %�� /'''` DATE I I
' � r
Telephone No: ( 1
White copy to f le Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
554

.�.,.�.n-f�:�.....�w......;..+]".'...;.�.G.:".yari.i�.�-"^'�•l ,}.^�a�,.::++r-r,rJ�J-i..f`"t. "�"''<`.wr.t�i7....'.:. X.�w;.:.. M'.�-n,.�+.i« ter.-ri'M;+•✓'• tip; i'(w-�' ..'•i -+ .. _ s':1 'r�,. +. ..
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour/S41
,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section Ir��),
(PERMITTED MINE)
1 . 1YulYL *JA1ViL r. " - "" - - r t.. % i G\ R L. lv1 IIV V YX',K1vll 1 f._ E C)
3. OPERATOR u►.s•,ai _(.),J 4. COUNTY
5. ADDRESS ::a C �c 1 Ci FR?
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE1_1 - L Zia Z7 7. RIVER BASIN
8. Person(s) contacted at sited + T . L S- l A (. ( t -- 1__ _
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? [ J,Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes Q"No
11. Date last inspected: I I 12. Any mining since last inspection? ®, Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
if no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? K Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes P No If yes, describe the
tvne and ,PVPrity of the rlamatre:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: a ,_
17, Other recommendations and comments: �. , , � n. , r- .k C
4 l1 r:.-� - �+ � c C__ t _ � • tC- + 7 C -� 1 .��"S"; � .: L �� ` ]� S��-� ""+ 1��.�',:t l
url -A
I IL
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? �©�Yes ❑ No (Explain) El Not Reviewed
19. FoIlow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes 0. No Proposed date-----f- w/- -- -
20. No, of additional pages of Inspection Report. 21. Copy of Report sent to operator.
(date)
INSPECTED BY: -fit t-- + ;- +t. Z _t DATE ,
Telephone No: (+
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist 10197
l .

ANOA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
March 19, 2002
.Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Howiler:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your recent request to have the corporate name changed from Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc. on the following
permits has been approved:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount II Quarry
43-03
Elliot Sand and Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand and Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton 11 Quarry
51-38
Buckleberry Sand Mine
68-06
North Orange Quarry
9g02-
, RaleigtCQuarry--)
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
Please attach this approval and the corresponding revised permit cover
page to each of your existing mining permits for future reference. The expiration date,
mine name and permit number on the permit document shall remain the same as
befare this modification.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919-733-45741 FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

•
Mr. Howiler
Page Two
G.S. 74-65 states that the issuance -of a mining permit does nQt supersede or
otherwise affect or prevent the enforcement of any zoning regulation or ordinance duly
adopted by an incorporated city or county or. by any agency or department of the State
of North Carolina.
Currently, a $500,000.00 blanket bond from Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc
is on file with this office which sufficiently covers all of the present operations.
Therefore, t am returning Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.'s $500,000.00 blanket
bond to you for your disposal
Please advise this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
VII IVGI Gly,
4ac E. vis, P.E., C.P.M
. EE:.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEDIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, P.E.
Mr. Toby Vinson, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Bradley Bennett - DWQ
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau

i 0
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc_
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
August 10, 2001
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Attention: Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Post Office Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Permit No. 92-02
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County
Neuse River Basin
Dear Mr. Howiler:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your application for modification of the above referenced mining permit has been
approved. The modification is to allow the construction of the Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal
Area as indicated on the mine map dated March 14, 2001 and last revised June 8, 2001. A
copy of the modified permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily upon the initial application.
Modifications were made as indicated by modification request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date, mine name and permit number
shall remain the same as before the modification.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local
zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations lies
with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 437.0 acres and the amount of land
you are allowed to disturb is 184.5 acres. Please also be advised that this permit is due to
expire on November 25, 2002.
Land Quality Section 919-733-45741 FAX: [phone] - Geological Survey Section 919-733-24231 FAX: [phone]
�. J 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources 919-733-38331 FAX: [phone] IntemPt: www.dlr.Pnr. state.nc.us/dlr.htm
An Gaual Onoortunity L Affirmative Adicn Employer - 50% Reryded 110% Post Consumer PaPer

•
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
August 10, 2001
Page 2
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at [phone] should you
have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
racy E. vis, P.E., C.P.M.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEDIch
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E., wlenclosures
Ms. Monika Sharma-WRC, wlenclosures
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ, wlenclosures
Mr. William Gerringer_DOL, Mine and Quay 1r i Bureau, w/o a closures

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, `The Mining Act
of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws,
rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Rnleinh Omgrnr
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all
lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this
permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department ri mint, it%Av fko
f �r �.. , aa..M .�.4jr VVI VI V V %I fly
expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another operator
succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale,
lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the duties
imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the
permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that both
operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the affected land
and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the operator
written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a
designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department may institute other
enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, terms
shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifi(:ations
Augu s� t 15, 1990& This permit has been modified to include an additional 105 acres of land (areas
B and C) as indicated in the modification request and aerial photograph received by the Land
Quality Section on November 3, 1989 on which only the construction of the overburden disposal
area shall be conducted as per the revised Grading Plan dated March 1990 and received by the
Land Quality Section on June 20, 1990 with several stipulations.
November 22. 1991: This permit has been modified to allow the on -site remediation of petroleum
contaminated soils as indicated in the information dated September 5, 1991 and in accordance
with the rules and requirements promulgated by the Environmental Management Commission.
This permit has been modified to allow the expansion of the existing pit and
the construction of the corresponding sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on the
Erosion Control Plan dated March 1992 and revised August 1992.
May 27. 1994: This permit has been modified to allow the construction of settling ponds as per
the plans received by the Land Quality Section on April 5, 1994.
April 24, 1995: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Nello L. Teer
Company to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.

Page 3
ctober 17. 1997: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at the site to
176.5 acres as indicated on the mine maps and associated sediment and erosion control plans
dated August 1997. In addition, the modification allows the installation of the primary crusher
station inside the existing pit (including the development of shear walls required for the crusher
relocation), expansion of the pit area, development of a new entrance road and interior access
roads, construction of new visual barrier berms, a new plant and process area, and new
office/scale house, and the installation of related erosion and sedimentation control measures as
specified by the above referenced plans.
May 2l.'L299, This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc..
August- 10. 2001 - This permit has been modified to allow the construction of the Borrow
Removal/Sludge Disposal Area as indicated on the mine map dated March 14, 2001 and last
revised June 8, 2001.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until November 25, 2002.
Co.ad*tians
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to
the following conditions and limitations:
QPERATING CONDITIONS:
Wastewater and Quarry D� ewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine de -watering shall be in arrnrrinni-e with +he
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance with
any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact the
Stormwater Section, Division of Water Quality, to secure any necessary stormwater
narmitS or nther approval rinm imcntc
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including fugitive
dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air
Quality.
R Durinn mmrry operation water trucks or other means that ma„ he nenesaar%/ ehnll
be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted area.

a
Page 4
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer (minimum 100 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity
of the natural watercourse or wetland.
C. The buffer zones shown on the "Site Plan With Buffer Zone Indication" dated August
1997 shall be maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the
exception of the installation of required sediment control measures and earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.
`?. EMs;on and Sediment boll//Ul
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen dikes,
silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from
discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland or natural
watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. The construction of the overburden disposal area shall be conducted as per the
_r /'+-_r:.-�. nl_.- r_a_r ■A_-_L Annn _.-r _�1 1�._ aL._ 1 _r
rev se Vrallllt�]. Plan dated March IUZIU and received by LTIC I-d11U WUc1111y OMAJU11
on June 20, 1990 with the following stipulations: (1) Diversion Ditch A, from Sta
0+00 to 1 +90 shall be provided with a suitable temporary liner (i.e., straw with
netting and/or acceptable alternative), (2) the minimum weir length for all sediment
traps shall be ten (10) feet, (3) all No. 5 washed stone filters shall be provided on
the upstream face of the sediment traps mLy and not on the top of the backside of
said structures, (4) the spillway at the existing pond shall be constructed with a 20
foot bottom width, (5) the minimum thickness for Class A stone treatments shall be
9 inches, Class B - 22 inches, Class 1 - 18 inches and Class II - 24 inches, and (6)
the proposed slope drains shall be considered permanent and provided with 12 foot
long NCDOT Class I rip rap aprons, 18 inches thick as a minimum. Any changes
in the permanent control of surface water runoff in the overburden disposal area
shall be addressed by a revised sediment and erosion control plan and submitted
to and approved by the Land Quality Section prior to its onsite implementation.
C. The Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1 and EC2, dated March 1992 and revised
August 1992 shall be followed.
D. The Settling Ponds Erosion Control Plan received by the Land Quality Section on
April 5, 1994 shall be followed with the following addition: Silt fence shall be erected
downstream of SB-1 prior to the construction of SB-1 and SB-2. Said silt fence shall
be maintained until both settling ponds have been completely constructed and
cfahili7arl
E. The Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1 and EC2, dated August 1997 shall be
followed with the following stipulation: temporary or other suitable liners shall be
installed in all temporary and permanent diversion channels, as necessary, to
prevent erosion and offsite sedimentation.

Page 5
F. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised erosion
control plan or mine map_ s submitted with the approved application for a mining
permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not limited to,
expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of
overburden disposal areas.
G. The construction of the Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal Area shall be conducted
as indicated on the mine map dated March 14, 2001 and last revised June 8, 2001
with the following stipulation: the silt fence installation shown below the +25 Year
Storm Outfall shall be replaced with an adequate rock check dam measure and tied .
into the silt fence installation on either side to provide more stable filtration of
concentrated flow.
Groundwater monitoring wells shaii be installed and monitored as deemed appropriate by
the Department.
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which can
be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the
erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be planted
or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain
such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any pit expansion conducted after
November 25, 1992 shall be graded to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
and shall be stabilized within 60 days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum
twenty-five (25) foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the top of the
rock and at the toe of the overburden slope.
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are, or
likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
rnndi dtc ghnii ha rnncfninfarl nr in0nilar l whan ragi Brad fo prewant ci ie-h rnnriitinne

•
%•
Page 6
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance no
farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or leased by
the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air overpressure,
and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as provided under
Sections B. and D. of this permit). The following blasting conditions shall be observed by
the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from surface
blasting:
• �• • _ •Tiu•i • s•
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component of
ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of any
regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling house,
church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.
10.0
AL
} 2.0
� 1.E
b:ll
0.
0.0
0.
0.4
0.
0.2
0.2
0.0
:1
Blast Vibration Frequency, Hz
Figure 1 Altemative blasting /eve/ criteria
(Source modified Aran fig, un: &-?. Elu, veil of '.'.fires RIP 8507)

C�
P�^, 7
191
C.
c
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following formulas:
W = (DIDS)2 Dg = Wu2
V = 160(Ds)-'-'
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
Dg = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per second,
for the purposes of this Section.
Airblast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129 decibels
linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied
building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted area such as
a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building,
unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the seismograph microphone
as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of
Measuring System. in Hz
Max Level,
in_dBL
_ �
0.1 Hz or lower -flat response
134 peak
2.0 Hz or lower -flat response
133 peak
6.0 Hz or lower -flat response
129 peak
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following formulas:
To convert U (psi) to P (dbl):
U = 82 (DIYY .33)-1.2
P = 20 x log (U12.9x10-9)
Confined Airblast/Overpressure ON)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35

Page 8
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Airblast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).
The airblast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section.
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemminq and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast t� rinSeGt
offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of the blast.
Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be
provided to the Department upon request.
If ground vibration or airblast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting may
occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization to blast
at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the high
ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal approval.
Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on the
mine site shall he suspenrieri until thr+ fnllnwinn nrtinnc haves hgan taken:
I. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the_ investigation shall be provided to the Department within
10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document the
cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions that
will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with the
approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine site.

0
Page 9
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any seismic
studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a level allowed
by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every reasonable effort to
incorporate the studies' recommendations into the production blasting program.
J. Notice -
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section Regional Office prior to any blast during a period
for which notice is requested.
Closer communications between the driller and explosives personnel shall be
conducted. Voids and fracturing are quite discernible during the drilling process and
this information must be required by and shared with the explosives personnel.
L. Weather:
Weather related issues (such as temperature inversions) shall be scrutinized prior
to loading an upper level shot based upon the location and bench level of the shot.
Blasting during temperature inversions should be avoided whenever possible.
Me, *3'-JFMMT1-11K*MT-M1
A qualified blasting consultant shall closely monitor the entire drilling and blasting
program at this site for a period of 30 days from November 15, 1996. This should
determine if any other changes in the drilling and blasting programs are needed to
prevent excessive air overpressure readings from occurring in the future.
low InIVi,FFIII;Fml'
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or fencing shall be
maintained at all times around the perimeter of.any highwall to prevent inadvertent public
access. In addition, a minimum 25 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at
the junction between the top of rock and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public thoroughfares
to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening methods, such as
constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed appropriate by the
Department.
B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the Erosion Control Plan,
Sheets EC1 and EC2, dated August 1997, In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or
Virginia pines or other acceptable species shall be. planted as deemed appropriate
by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.

•
•
<1 11•• •1
Page 10
The operator shall notify. the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any .part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any approved revisions to
it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from the Department prior to on -
site implementation of the revisions.
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit area
unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from both the
Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent
with the approved reclamation plan. -
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971 generated
on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be disposed of in a
designated refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of in a disposal
facility approved by the Division of Waste Management. No petroleum products,
acids, solvents or their storage containers or any other material that may be
considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit. the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be " rmining refuse" tin adaition to those specifically listed under
G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1) on -site generated land clearing debris
2) conveyor belts
3) wire cables
4) v-belts
5) steel reinforced air hoses
6) drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit boundary,
the following information must be provided to and approved by the Division of Land
Resources Rfioc 10 commencement of such disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established.

•
0
Page 11
E. Contaminated soil remediation (i.e., stockpiling of only petroleum contaminated soil)
shall be allowed at the .site as indicated on the site map submitted to the Land
Quality Section with the additional information dated September 5, 1991. In
additI%. it shall ve coi,ductea in accordance with the rules and requirements
promulgated by the Environmental Management Commission.
WINEF-ITIT17-rr-�me"I:-..�
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the Department
by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
:•1• P.
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a $500,000.00
Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall
not exceed the bonded acreage.
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted access
to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

0 0
Page 12
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated materials
shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent with the
future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
re brestation practices as established by the worth Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station
and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule included
in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with mining
operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable time after
completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and shall be
completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIO__NS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation shall
be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade (fence)
along the top of any highwall, and grade and. revegetate any areas in unconsolidated
material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
inciirp Slope Onhility
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backflled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C . The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall -be leveled and smoothed.

0
Pace 13
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12.A.
through E.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul water.
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
prepared by Mr. Paul C. Embler dated August 16,1991 in the application for renewal dated
April 4, 1992.
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In any
event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or termination of
mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including revegetation, shall
be completed within two years of completion or termination of mining.
This permit, issued April 9, 1972, renewed April 9, 1982, modified August 15, 1990 and
November 22, 1991, renewed and modified November 25, 1992, and modified May 27,
1994, April 21, 1995, October 17, 1997, and May 21, 1999, is hereby modified this 10th
day of Auaust, 2001 pursuant to C.S. 74-52.
By:
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Re: Crabtree Qkwrry
Subject: Re: Crabtree Quarry
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 18:10:29 -0400
From: Tracy Davis <[e-mail]>
To: "Choi, Hunt" <Hunt.Choi aci.raleigh.nc.us>
Mr. Choi,
Thanks for the message. I am sorry we have been unable to connect lately. I was in
a mediated settlement conference from 10:00 am until 4:00 pm today out of the
office.
I will be in my office all day on Monday with no meetings scheduled at the present
time. If you can call me at 733-4574, we can set up a date and time to discuss the
Crabtree Quarry situation further.
Thanks for your patience.
"Choi, Hunt" wrote:
> Mr. Davis,
> Since we've had such trouble contacting each other by telephone I thought email
might be easier. I'd like to meet with you in order to discuss some of the issues
regarding the Crabtree Quarry which we discussed in our previous conversation. As
you may be aware, Mello Teer has submitted an appeal to the Hoard of Adjustment in
order to get a ruling on the City's zoning enforcement action. The City would like
to call you as a witness to describe the interplay between local zoning .laws and the
mining act as you understand it. I am hoping that I may meet with you sometime next
week in order to further discuss these matters. I'll look forward to your reply.
Thanks.
> Hunt K. Choi
> Associate City Attorney
> City of Raleigh
> 222 W. Hargett Street, Suite 218
> Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
> [phone]
> [phone] (facsimile)
Tracv E. Davis, P.E., C.P.M. <[e-mail]>
State Mining Specialist
Division of Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
of 2 6/7/2002 633 PM

�-
s
��
..
..�..! ,
;..
�
,,
, ,r
..
.•
�}
rM
{a v
. ,c � ,u, ,`.,
�L
•�

Crnhtree Quarry
J
Subject: Crabtree Quarry
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:15:03 -0400
From: "Choi, Hunt" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Mr. Davis,
since we've had such trouble contacting each other by telephone I thought email
.-night be easier. I'd like to meet with you in order to discuss some of the issues
regarding the Crabtree Quarry which we discussed in our previous conversation. As
you may be aware, Nello'Teer has submitted an appeal to the Board of Adjustment in
order to get a ruling on the City's zoning enforcement action. The City would like
to call you as a witness to describe the interplay between local zoning laws and the
mining act as you understand it. I am hoping that I may meet with you sometime next
week in order to further discuss these matters. I'll look forward to your reply.
Thanks.
Hunt K. Choi
Associate City
City of Raleigh
222 W. Hargett
Raleigh, North
[phone]
[phone]
Attorney
Street, Suite 218
Carolina 27602
(facsimile)
i of 1 6/7l2002 6:10 PM

4 �
.r.
_ �
t
'.� � �
. w/

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
AppiiGa�rt'y Name: �`&Ni `-
5/-,j(8 43 9C2-03 -b1, Y3 3
8-t3 9a 14-01 -aa 3a 0 ,&60b
sl -0 � q I c./Permit N: —Coui
P. r4W- Project Name: — ..dLu kt '
Date Received:
35-13 p
Reviewer: River Basin Name: L_�t�
❑ New 0 Renewal ❑ Modification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer 0 Release
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional Information a Needed: �
u Fee Received:
�QIF� Regional Office (2 complete copies; attach the "LQ5 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach tath the PWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Dorm" to the other copy; send both copies to the Regional Engineer)
P.,� eat_ �f►-,—Allr�__, t
v rw w. INvu vG(ApS �SV��we( NeG a
❑ Division of Water Resources pate: Routed Rec'd
0 NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ U5 Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification requeete that add land to the permit)
0 Division of Parks & Recreation Date:, Routed Rec'd
❑ NC Geological 5urvey 5ection Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the. permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑ Other: Date: Routed Rec'ci
**5u5pen5e Date for Comments: N -' (no later than 25 days
from receipt
Please note, the following:

February 14, 2002
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612
Re: Corporate Name Change
Dear Ms. Wehner:
• ■■■
■ ■ ■ Hanson
w� ca�a
Southeast RegEon
P.0 • E3ox 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
FEe � 8 IaoZ
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. wishes to inform your office that it has
undergone a corporate name chance: Effective Jani,ary 1 7r1E17 Hanson Annranofiws
Carolina, Inc. became known as Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Enclosed please find a completed Page 1 of the NC Mine Permit Application
Form and a completed Land Entry Agreement Form for the following plants which are
affected by this name change and which operate under the indicated existing mine
permit numbers.
Buckleberry Sand
- Permit #51-38
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel
- Permit #43-21
Crabtree Quarry
- Permit #92-03
Durham Quarry
Elliott Sand & Gravel
- Permit #32-01
- Permit #43-03
�.
Elm City Quarry
- Permit #98-13
J
Holly Springs Quarry
- Permit #92-13
��
Lexington Quarry
- Permit #29-13
FEBNeverson 8
tCU�
Quarry
- Permit #98-02
North Durham Quarry
("aka" Rougemont Quarry)
- Permit #32-07
��' " ' DI`.;
North Orange Quarry
LAND
(°aka° Rougemont Quarry)
- Permit #68-6-
Princeton Quarry
- Permit #51-05
Z5aleigh,Quarry,.
("aka" North Raleigh Quarry)-.-
.Permit #92-02—
Rocky Mount Quarry
- Permit#33-13
Please note on the submitted Mine Permit Application Forms that we have
changed the permanent address for receipt of official mail. I will now be the contact
person at the address as indicated thereon and in the letterhead above.

Also enclosed pl* find two checks totaling $700.00 to cikr the $50.00
processing fee for each perm t name change.
Pursuant to this name change, we ask that the reclamation bond for the mines
previously operating as Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc. be returned to us and that
these mines be covered henceforth under the reclamation bond previously issued for
H!mncnn Annronn4uc Cnlitheaaf InC
We trust that this completes the information necessary to effect these changes to
your records; however, if any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
cle 4,--
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Area Environmental Manager
Enclosures
•.Hanson
82-4/311
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240 6112 0
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30084 VOID AFTER i;o HAYS
no 4 7 g pr, 0- o", G 5 0 a n:d 0 0 ct S
PAY DOLLARS
DATE TO THE ORDER OF CHECK NO. i "O� AMOUNT
r .� .5; v. r- •.r•-Ol /Jj � ,s. 'tom
�A HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST. INC.'
MELLON BANK, NA, PHILADELPHIA. PA (0310)
PAYABLE THROUGH MELLON BANK (DE) N.A., MLMINGTON. DE --
MOM
Harrson --- . - - -- - -
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240 VOID AFFER 60 DAYS
TUCKER,, GEORGIA 30084
PAY
DATE TO THE ORDER OF
CHECK NO. !15*jt
HANSON AG REinA
MELLON BANK, N.A., PHILADELPHUI PA (0310)
PAYABLE THROUGH MELLON BANK (DE) N.A., WLMINGTON, DE
[i2.4/311
61129
ILLARS
AMOUNT l
SOUTHEAST, INC.'

•
0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A M NING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine Raleigh QUagy _ County Wake
River Basin Neuse Latitude (dd.mm.ss)_ N35-55-53, Longitude (dd.mm.ss) W79,-32-41
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson 69gjqgaLes ou eat Inc.
Permanent address for receipt of official mail** P. O. Box 848, Cheraw. SC 29920
A ry i nSteve HgAler. PE Area gnyironmental Mar.
Telephone 843 — 537 -7883 _ .. __....
4. Mine Office Address,, 10501 CaRita1 Boulevard, Wake Forest, NC 27587
Telephone, 919-556-4011 __
7. Mine manager B111 ma-2-1t:UM
Y '
We hereby certify that aft details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts Witt be cause for permit revocation.
***S
Print
Title President
9Z
This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the reclamation
bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt of a
mete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental infnrmatinn renuked by the f)enartmi mt All nntin»* mugt be ar_Idroagwi onA all r nuirari maim
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as deeded.
i.,'...� FED 1 $ ' ,f
2002
Dr rgrl; !
L-._._._LAN�OJ.^•.t.;_I_5�:'"i'IQ�J I

cya'!"W:
;51434 jvg ubyovuqu Ilia in m"Mm"inq wmlqcjt'
Injupwq SIM, UY InIqlay
- q. j
ily, '!j. Ill'%,
Pj,
"wanu Op" 04 "WOR Sam
"too q w
To jaw rpsi y vow, num,
yj wp
ON e. A
'fit
hu
aryin i "wr too an i
F v
.01
i-lO K IVA 121 is -`!11 i i-:..? i4*l.' �!! t?
0 0

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands or
operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as may be
reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the land as
may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry out
reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature: C
Print Name: Justin E Williams
President
APPLICANT:*
Signature:* c • �V •
Print Name: Justin E. Williams ,
Address: n o A re es So theasTitle: President
100orescen CentreSuite�
Tucker, GA 30084
Company: Hanson A re ates Southeast, Inc.
Telephone: [phone] _ Mine Name: Raleigh Quarry
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application.
ad- the appropriate_nrocessina fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order payable to
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be sent to the Land Quality Section
Central Offtce at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at (919)
733-4574.

y�T. lqo r? 11 '1 9I.J 114 1 q
Ilk, 00�f� .1) Mj­.w
-4; xlt -at' -Its
liw ;A't 01 -*,9, PIC 0". Aji )41 .,W;7
tj
FP t
% I
L",
IPI, lie;
0 0

r
- —_ �. i�� , J ����_ .' Jam-"•'-'
MAE
]
i
f
,\�\.
/
-
/+
_
by iYfl• -W--SlIl�
-9,, Le of ftA
1. •If' J �:=� p�r•"�
�� •
w
�/
'
-•.��+'S�1ie�' Wei l_�
O�•afMl���e� • u1C
g
a
�
�rwrttre WlfK.>• iW wvmnt#IR�1¢` gas
�-fiAaa�e
.
!A■
"'Hanson
RAUAGH QUARRY (SE>
.� VINF PLAN
�
.' ]'-100' BuitlxN x¢fsFR
mlfe rfnx.o.L

I
oil
� �-- -'�
- - -R -
°T'i :r.i
+':� r^'" :M:
I P`yt - ' -- -
j.
-
� :fi yj •\�. -'.',� �
���� ��
„, 'n' ..
-
I
-
�.- _ - N7 *�' i• �J'
r,f,f�
-' • `C'Y•�X ,�r.
- rl a•T
f
d.
;'':'iff f
4 r
7.
k..
R.
_.
:. •,
' I �,'
``r, ra
�-�ini' �
�
.,
is :�: f
r r• � '
`
• ,���
'
� � �I � I' : r,! ''•i '.'I '-"� a�rf"�.`•
4 ,iI I, i` ,r�*�
.. � ���� �:!'' v �
'• f ,�''{
J,It,
'h�
� +'�` I
II I
� - .Y•A.k' I
A
i I .r,a �!
� Jan,
1 FIE nF Ll: i L [a By
r �
ARLA c.4
PERMIT MODIFICATION
tMARCH. 2001). REFER Ta
_
SHEETS 2 8 3 FOR iNl{VE RIAN
AND RECLAMATION PLAN.

A - A
5$�. VIEW
CROSS giTIION (If TYR SLOPL NAiN
CONFL Gi iRAT-iGli
v N T
V,
L
f' 1 t _.'WzJ- YX
I 1 /!
N-1
I'mHanson
P-tLEIGH QUARPY I -,.E)
/� f
. 57
RECLAMA714DN PL=LIT
yvltlW -91

Raleigh Quarry (92-02) "• E,
Subject: Raleigh Quarry (92-02)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:09:18 -0400
From: John Holley <[e-mail]>
To: Chris Hite <[e-mail]>
The latest submittal appears to address all of our previous issues;
however, T would not allow silt fence in an area of concentrated flow
belo,. the .'4.-itial culvert construction. A rock check darn would be more
appropriate.
1 of 1 7/14/2001 M57 AM

-.-- -! v - . . r--. . Iil - ", , .,. _,
•
MINING CHECKLI5T FOR ROUTING
I �
Applicant's Name: 14o if Project Name: frta��' eta«
+Paso%%tq AC.
Applic./Permit No.: tg-OACounty: _A14.Ci Date Received: :Jr�o, 1S.7001
Reviewer:. /'%11 f3i �P T River Basin Name: _I� 5e
❑ New ❑ Renewal Codification (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Transfer ❑ Relea5e
❑ Partial Release No,<dditional Information ❑ Fee Needed: $
❑ Fee Received: $
PIe_ase route critire application nackaAe to:
Q� a e'; Regional Office (2 complete copies; attach the "LQ5 Regional
Office Mining Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach hath the PWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy; send both .copies to the Regional Engineer)
Date: Routed —� ec'd
❑ Division of Water Rceource5 Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ NC Wildlife Rer2ource5 Commi55ion Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ U5 Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification rectuests that add land to the permit)
Pkaee route Brkt 3 nage5 of.t_hr, application and any location many to:
❑ Division of Parks & Recreation Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ NC Geologlcal Survey Section Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification reu�uesto that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑ Other:
Date: Routed Rec'd
*5u5I?en5e Date for COi'1'll'1'lent5: TV/d� 00/ (no later than 25 days
from recelpt)
Lease note the following:
v�

J..__ w 1 nrtn1
Mr. Chris Hite
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center n
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612
Re: Mine Permit Modification Appl
Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal
Raleigh Quarry — Permit # 92-02
Dear Mr. Hite:
• 0■O
000
o ■ 0 Hanson
J u N 15 2001
DENR
1 AND OUALITY SECTION
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
This is in answer to your request by letter dated May 15, 2001 for additional
information regarding our above -referenced application for permit modification.
Enclosed are two sets each of the revised design notes and the Mine Plan and
Reclamation Plan drawings.
Referring to Mr. John Holley's e-mail that was attached to your letter, please note
the following in answer to his concerns:
2(a) - We have eliminated the temporary rock check dam from the E&S plan. By
changing the sequence of the work activities and E&S control measure installation, we
feel that we can have only a minimum of land disturbed for a minimum time that would
impact the area below the proposed +25-yr. storm outfall. As indicated on the revised
work sequence found both in the design notes and on the Mine Plan drawing, we will
begin by disturbing only the area required to install the 15" RCP under the project area
and the area required to proceed with installation of the head -killer basin. We will use
temporary silt fencing below this small area to treat runoff during the two weeks it will
take to complete this phase of the work. Any stormwater from above the project site
during this period will be held and/or routed around the site as indicated. See Section VI
of the design notes for a more complete description.
2(b) - Slope drain configuration has been changed somewhat and individual
drains have been sized in accordance with allowable standards in the NC E&S Manual.
Culvert sizing has been checked and inlet control conditions, as well as exit conditions
and total head loss, taken into account. See revised Sections II and V-C of the design
notes. According to our calculations, the 15" RCP culvert and the 8" steel discharge
nine {arcs i►nih �rin."I I�inl{�i�rnrl
r/IrJV ■�VIV {/V{II iRV VMI.{GI{V I� VILVV•
2(c) - Please see the revised section II of the design notes (Pages 2-3) for a
more completion description of the retention basin draw -down process. The water level
in the ponds will be continually monitored and pulled down as needed in order to insure
that the ponds will hold the 25-yr. storm when it occurs.

2(d) - The head on the retention basin drain pipe valve as originally located in
our design will be only 2 psi maximum. This will cause no problem in operation of the
valve. We had placed the valve on the discharge end of the pipe for ease of access,
installation, and maintenance, along with corresponding safety concerns, and wish to
leave it there.
In consideration of the above items, it is our understanding that we are only
required to design for the 10-yr storm event. We have actually designed for the 25-yr.,
and in some cases, the 50-yr. event and thus feel that we have gone beyond the norm in
our efforts to protect adjacent resources.
We trust that all of the information supplied to you is now sufficient to allow your
department to complete the processing of our application; however, should you require
any additional information, do not hesitate to contact the writer.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Z". /74*" LOW
Steve Howiler, RE
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
Enclosures

7! L
Q; 1"MW:5"0
v)? !"Os,
'.Qki COS: 1 11000: 1 on Q WL
% q V 1 A10- q MO , 1—t r YA _11 �! 'W
&%r
'yUl. �'

Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry
Erosion and Sediment Controi Design Calculations
for
Mine Permit #92-02 Modification
Addition of 8-acre Borrow/Settling Basin Sludge Disposal Area
Submitted to
N. C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
LWI V 1%71v11 %ir L.c11 1u I Xqu.7vul %+ca
Land Quality Section
March, 2001
Revised June, 2001
��11� �11111
D �
�ENR S�CSION
Prepared by.
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, inc.
P.O. Box 848 Q,9eet.........
Cheraw, S.C. 29520 ¢i UF(ot
843-537-7883
i
F.
Isis 0% *

rj i
a
0
0

•
Table of Contents
Section 1 - Calculate 25-yr. storm peak runoff, determine runoff
retention times/volumes and sediment storage
required In ponds. - Page 1 of 6
Section II - Size drain pipe to plant settling basin system fresh
water return pond - Page 2 of 6
Section III - Size outfall structure for + 25-yr. storm event - Page 2 of 6
Section IV - Size temporary slope drains for finished pond
sludge disposal pile - Page 4 of 6
va�lon V = Chock u'no,. f V^i Gast slde of IQIboad and size
culvert to carry this storm flow under subject area - Page 4 of 6
Section VI - Erosion and Sediment Control Measure Installation
Sequence and General Sequence of Work - Page 6 of 6

r 1.
'T +
ri Is

•
Pg. 1 of §
Hanenn ennrcnoFee fl�m ine In..
. • .w� •aye,vim...\Vv -w-Is., II[V.
Raleigh Quarry
Mine Permit Modification Application - March 2001
Runoff Calculations and Erosion & Sediment Control Design for +/--8 acre Borrow Area and
Subsequent Settling Basin Sludge Disposal
Reference: N.C. Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual
Using TR-55 for calculation of Maximum Expected Runoff from 50-yr. Storm Event.
Runoff to the Neuse river will be controlled as follows:
Two retention ponds will be constructed along the lower toe of the disturbed area. Joined by a
ditch, they will be sized so as to in combination contain the 25-yr. storm runoff. A piped
connection to the plant s settling basin system fresh water return pond will be used to release
the accumulated 25-yr.runoff for use at the plant. Runoff from up to a 50-yr. storm will be
treated by settling in the retention pond and then discharged via suitably sized outfall
structure.
L Calculate 25-yr. storm peak runoff, determine runoff` retention dnmesIvolumes
and sediment storage required In ponds. Maximum runoff will occur after timber has
been harvested and borrow excavation begins, culminating in bare, leveled site.
A. — Base Infonnagon for Peak Runoff Ctr 2&!Iation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 8 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 625'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+1-1 acres pond near discharge of watershed) = 81
Soil Group "B° and "C":
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) - Soil Group B = 0.93 Acs. (12%)
Open space, grass cover 50-75% (borrow area cut slopes) -
Soil Group C = 1.35 Acs. (17%)
Newly graded area (borrow pit) - Soil Group °C" = 4.62 Acs. (57°%)
F-3on s i I A A A A-- !A I N 1
! IU. IV MV5. I�O)
8.00 Acs. 100%
B. — Calculation of Peak Dischar+ne Rate for the Contribution..Drainane Area
1) Calculate average curve number (CN) using Table 8.03b.
% Area x CN
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) - 12% x 55 = 660
Open space, grass cover 50-75% (borrow area cut slopes) - 17%, x 79 = 1343
Newly _graded area (borrow pit) - 57% x 93 = 5301
Ponds - 14 x100 = LAM
100% = 8704

iY
4,11
v- I P �Jr
j"i'l
t2
ZVI
Ll

Pg. 2 Of 6
CN = 8704/100 = 87.04 USE,177
2) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 6.5 in.
From Table 8.03c, by double Interpolation, runoff depth = 6.0
3) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 625':
equivalent drainage area tt 6.2 acres
From Figure 8.03p, 3%-8% slope, CN=87: Peak rate of runoff = 8.1 cfalinch
Q, = 9.1 W nch x 5.00 inches = 45 cfa
Qx = 45cfs x 8 Acs/6.2Acs = 58 fs
4) Adjust peak discharge rate QZ for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
5) Adjust peak discharge rate Qs for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 8% average slope, 8 acres, by interpolation:
adjustment factor = 0.91
04=68x0.91 = 3cfs
6) Adjust peak discharge 04for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 8:1, at disharge, 25-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.58
Qp 25.24 = 53 cis x 0.58= 31 cfa
C. - Cligulate re-quirere-quired 26 r. Itorm runoff volm no
(5.00 in. (runoff depth) x 6.95 acs.) + (6.5 in. rainfall to pond x 1.10 acs) = 3.49 ac-ft
152,000 cf
Available volume =1400' x 3.5' x (40 + 26)/2 = 162,000 cf
D. - Calculate required sediment storam volume (1800cf/ac of drainage Is required):
Total area = 8 ac x 1800 d=14,400 cf req'd.
Available = (218.5'-216') x (20+30)/2 x 1400' = 87,500 cf
11. Size drain pipe to plant settling basin system fresh water return pond
We will hold up to a 25-year storm in the retention basin system. Our plan is to bleed this
water off as it accumulates for use as make-up water in our closed -loop plant wash water
settling basin system. We will install a drain pipe from the retention pond system with a gate
valve for controlling the water flow into the closed -loop system.

ji I
01
0 P ;-J
t, 4
t3% 2! i tZ. �-!Xl ;J
g
0

•
•
Pg. 3of§
We normally circulate approximately 2,000 GPM of water to the plant to be used in the
stone washing process. Approximately 10% of this useage is lost on a continual basis by
absorption into the washed stone products and evaporation. In addition, we normally use
200 GPM for plant wash down and in the water truck for area -wide dust control. All of this
water is lost from the system daily.
We normally make up for this water loss in the closed loop system by adding in water
pumped from the quarry dewatering operation and from a river pump. Upon installation of the
E&S controls covered by this mine permit modification, we will use this runoff water as a
primary source of make-up water for the closed -loop system. Plant personnel will be trained
in the operation for the system and will responsible on a daily, or otherwise short-term basis,
for maintaining the water level in the retention ponds at the 218.5' elevation.
Setting inlet invert of drain pipe at elevation = +/-218.5, assuming we have held the 25-
yr. storm event, we will have a total of 152,000 d of stored water. Planning to drain this
accumulated water off in 6 days at 10 hrs/day = 60 hrs., we need to drain 152,000 d / 60 hrs =
2533 d/hr = 0.70 cfs (or 314 GPM). This will be the primary make-up water supply for the
closed -loop pond system (requirements as outlined above) during this period.
From Manning Formula, 8° steel pipe (n =0.013) on 0.5'/100' grade, yielding 0.80 cis
capacity. Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total Ht, w He + Hv + Hr = (V2/ 2g )(Ire + 1 + ((29n 2 L)/R"33))
where, Ice = 0.9 for straight projected end
V = Q/A = 0.70 cfs/(n)(0.33ft)2, mean velocity flowing full
=2fps
R = A/WP = (n)(0.33ftf / (27t)(0.33) = 0.165 pipe flowing full
Total HL _ (4/64.4)(0.9 + 1 + ((29)(0.013)2 (100)) / (0.165)'-33
= 0.46'
Available H = 222 -- 218.67 = 3.33' OKI (flow will be greater than 0.70 cfs at 25-yr
level — regulate by valve as required)
Outlet Vel. = Vo = 0.486/n)(R)m (S)"2 = (1.486/0.013)(0.165) m (0.005) x
= 2.4 fps
W. Size outfall structure for +25-yr. storm event
A. — Calculate apgwimate 60-yr. storm runoff
From Figure 8.031, the rainfall amount for the 50-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 7.2 in.
From Table 8.03c, by double interpolation, runoff depth = 3.64 In.
Qe = 5.68/5.00 x 53 ds = 60 cis
Q mu = 60 x 0.622 (surface ponding factor, 50-yr. storm) = 37 cfs

0
0
Y,II 4's, `s .'�i� ,'•:f"'-, ,� (e�M �Y r: ... '.r'?" '�#ll+Fi,, a,•i!i`'f!.af'�:�li `+t.'I .1 y.: �_ �4 .. 1. .'1 ���
W I
1'7
t
El'. . . - C' i i " , . I I '
:% .'. 7'.
All
itx. -wil 1w {j I
L

11
S = 10740' : 0.25 ft/ft
Try B = 6' to hold dowry on size of rip -rap and do
Try Z=3
Page 4 of 6
1) From Figure 8.061: do = 0.55' & d50c = 1.05' Use d50c = 12' and dmax = 18"
Rip -rap lined channel will have 6' wide bottom, with 3:1 side slopes, depth = 1', approximately
50' long. Rip -rap will have d50 size of 12" and dmax = 180. Depth of rip -rap will be 18" x 1.5 =
27". Line subgrade with filter fabric.
Channel will dump into head -killer basin. Basin dimensions = 18' wide x 20' long x 3' deep.
Use 12" of #4 stone beneath rip -rap. Check dam outlet.
1V S/7'fj tame rAti al �0 rlfrolne fur NnIah'04Y""`0 YYi"> dfy� Zvi
Using Table 6.32a, for drainage areas of size:
0.5 acs, use 15"
0.6 acs, use 15"
0.7 acs, use 16"
0.9 acs, use 18"
See reclamation plan drawing.
Discharge of slope drains will be into the retention ponds. Line slopes at discharge point with
12" maximum size rip rap. Blanket depth = 1.5 x 12' = 18'. Extend rip rap out into retention
pond floor 5'.
V. Check runoff from east side of railroad and size culvert to carry this storm
flow under subject area
A. — Base Infonnatlon for Peak Runoff Caicufatlon
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 12 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 800'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 7.5%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-0.4 acres pond near discharge of watershed) = 30:1
Soil Group
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) — CN = 55

oil; 0157T of
Low: w "n n
0 Zvi Ito > st" M:
kj': ccqaj ,g
X it TWO 01 cv . , : -
RRov r%w %ooL ion, % M,

LI
•
Page 5 of 6
6_ i Calinniafinn of Peak rli:nherne I?sfa f—thin C,^.I:%lbilt'no Dralnnage AN —a
1) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.031, the rainfall amount for the 50-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 7.2 In.
From Table 8.03c, by double interpolation, runoff depth = 2.23 In.
2) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 800':
equivalent drainage area =10 acres
From Figure 8.03p, 3%-8% slope, CN=55, 10 acs: Peak rate of runoff = 8.0 cfalinch
Q, = 8.0 Winch x 2.23 inches =17.8 cc
02 = 17.8cfs x 12 Acs/1 OAcs : 21, 4, c�fs
3) Adjust peak discharge rate 02 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
rnnrfifiM - nnna
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Q3for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 7.5% average slope, 11.5 acres, by interpolation:
adjustment factor =1_0
Q4= 21.4 x 1.0 = 21.4c%
5) Adjust peak discharge 04for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 30:1, at disharge, 50-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.75
Op 28.24 = 21.4 ds x 0.75 =16 Cfs
C - Size Culvert to Carry Storm Flow Under Sublect Area
Availahle grade = 16% (16' drnn in +1- 1 non
Using RCP pipe (n = 0.013)
a 15" culvert will cant' +1-25 cfs at 16% grade. > 16 cfs -- okl
Checking for inlet, velocity head, and pipeline friction losses:
Total HL = He + Hv + HI = (V2/ 2g )(ke + 1 + ((29n2L)/R'-33))
Where, ice = 0.5 for factory -supplied flared inlet
V = Q/A = 16 cfs/(7r)(0.625ft)2, mean velocity flowing full
= 13 fps
R = ANVP = (n)(0.625ft)2 / (2n)(0.625) = 0.312 pipe flowing full
Total HL = (169/64.4)(0.5 + 1 + ((29)(0.013)2 (100)) / (0.312)''33 = 10.0'

-.''>>' ! 1• .i'Y . +: } i •+ t1!!6' 4+. ���, ii :a?i , 1 a, - .lo 1,
1'
+V `,i.l�!-a <!„"� 1: iAiA} 'i.. a,1 i'aj r,E '� , .Y L, •. � �.,. ..7 .•. .��7€{
a
#: ,.#:� LtL, I.' ht-filr ,, #: .il+ 'T' is#. �"i� ,L�"''a .. .' •ti'
«Jt.Oi,.w:� iu'ti�:r
�;' � �� ,� ' t it r $ l fit•'- �i =•
4;''���� ".. .i ., , ..'.,j I lei .. •' 'y.4 �i
a
' r ,J . -�: ,a: 4, -t i i' ` . � �_ ,'. 'i, f,' .1.'., h�� _f { i .1:� r: „':•i' :e'
. ' ":l,', ' f.�Yf'• i j f ,,j ij�;• S`� �' i�.�l :Y,•vi' i.�7:.1.1`) +�1' .f;�i - �,•„ - )^"#�
' ^e :,�s',,�� its .'R. 'F�,,� .4sai �'•.I, �ifT3.- t„r��'; i.�t ',Yi:��:,1 ,Y. .ii��.. , �

•
•
Page 6 of §
OVsilshlo l.i UAA! � MAI - ei7Q —')IA IA..e +„ F.e -A. L7Hl iw„ ;-% � 4 A I f%V1 lei-. ..:....All
•. uu.�a,.M . . — ! 1.. — . •. — il%o — A. .1 ty blC. w Imou-niiiQi IJa0li 11 — 1-r %FF%§ kilLltr %,ClFM,lly will
be greater than 16 ds as indicated above)
Outlet Vel. = Vo = (1.466/n)(R)v3 (S)112= (1.486/0.013)(0.0.312) m (0.16)Y'
21 fps
W. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measure InstalWon Sequence and
General Sequence of Work
Description and Sequence of Activity
- Install silt fencing on +/- 212' contour
around lower edge of site
- Clear & grub area for pipe installation and
install 150 RCP under area
- Construct outfall head -killer basin
- Cut timber
- Clear & gruio area rvr construction of retention
ponds
- Dig retention ponds/construct retention dike
- Seed retention dike and slopes of pond
- Construct +25-yr. storm outfall
- Install overflow pipe to plant fresh water
pump pond
- Clear & grub entire area
- Remove borrow from area
- Backfill area with pond dippings
(I 0-yr. process)
- Clean sediment from retention ponds as needed
- Install slope drains as needed
- Install drainage swales and pipes (as shown
on plans) as necessary to divert runoff from
disturbed areas into retention ponds
- Establish grass on final slopes as created in
accordance with approved vegetation plan
K&S Activity or Work Activity
US
W
E&S
W
W
E&S
E&S
US
E&S
W
W
W
E&S
US
US
US
Note: Temporary silt fencing will be installed below the construction area to trap sediment
generated during installation of the 15" RCP pipe and construction of the outfall head -killer
hsein Tha inlof few fhn nino will ho hlnrlrar enrf f" nviefinet nnnl orna nk&mA of Fite nine inlmf
......... ...., ....,....., ...... F..F,... ,..,................. r..... ,..., ..,,..,....ty F,,,.,..-..,..................,, p.F,.........
will be utilized to store any accumulated rainfall. This portion of the construction should require
about two weeks. If required during this period, we will pump excess accumulated rainfall
from the existing pool area around the construction site. The temporary silt fencing below the
outfall head -killer basin will be removed after completion of the basin and turning of runoff
from above the site Into the new 15" RCP.

! �W;" V-A9 WCOi
il, Ili 1 5.- 1E.:31�s.tv�!_-,
t-i X I.-, U I
k. --47 LJ Al'j.I
ON
i 4 'i 0;'J

North Carolina • 9 wow
�— Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1� • .
.-_..._.. CFI
Michael F. Easley, Governor i`�w►��r..,,r
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NCDENR
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E. May 15, 2001
Director and State Geologist Division of Land Resources
Certified 099 2400 0012 0647 4435
Return Receipt_ Requested
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Attention: Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Post Office Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Raleigh Quarry
Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Neuse River Basin
Dear Mr. Howiler:
We have reviewed the modification request you submitted for the above
referenced mine site. However, the following information is needed to continue
processing your application:
Please submit a response to the enclosed review comments from Mr. John
Holley, P.E..
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items
listed above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two
(2) copies of the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 513.0013, you are hereby advised that you have
180 days from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested
information. If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional
time, you must submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why
the deadline can not be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If
an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the
mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files at the
Land Quality Section [phone] Fax [phone] Geological Survey Section [phone] Fax [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources [phone] Fax [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

or
C E R E 1912 MAIL 7099 3400 0012 Ofi47 4435
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Page 2
end of the 180 day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application
sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Chris Hite
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.

[i wd: Raleigh Quarry (92-02))
•
Subject: [Fwd:
Date: Mon, 30
From: John Holy
To: Chris Hite
m
-11
By the way, 1:1 s -,
.....................................
..n
Subject: Raleigh Q>t C3
Date: Mon, 30 4
From: John Holley
To: Chris Hite < C3
C3
We have reviewed tern
following comments.,
}Ir
Cl
(1) DAQ indicates ntr
concerned that we 4
Postage $
Cert'died Fee
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required}
FOO
(EndOTS— neReqlhcted uired}
Total pos'Lge 9 Feea
:es also.
Postmark
Hete............................................................
..............................
(Pfease Pnnt Clem" 410 be comp'--
t .
or FO box No. r the
No.. -
Slate, TfP+4 •
ans.
ty; DWQ is only
(2) While the conceptual SSE looks OK, the design and details are
deficient.
(a) The proposed Rock Check Dam must be designed/constructed in
accordance with
the manual specifications. Particular attention needs to be given
to stone and spillway
design.
(b) The design of culverts and slope drains does not consider inlet
control conditions that
will significantly impact the available capacity. Roth appear to
need to be increased in size.
Dissipator designs are also neededffor slope drains.
(c) Although the total available storage in the proposed pond looks
OK, the intended
operation of the pond is not clear. If the EMS were to control the
water level prior to a
storm event, the available storage may not be sufficient to contain
the 25yr. runoff as
proposed. This should be clarified and documented better.
(d) Although the dike serving the pond is small and the head will be
low, the drain valve
should be installed on the upstream end of the conduit.
I would not recommend approval until the deficiencies listed above are
addressed. Thanks for your patience. If there are any questions,
please advise.
t of 1 4/30/2001 3:35 PM

Raleigh Quarry (92-02) 0 •
Subject: Raleigh Quarry (92-02)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:43:42 -0400
From: John Holley -�[e-mail]>
To: Chris Hite <Chris. Hite@ncmail. net>
We are working on this one, coordinating with our current mine
inspections, etc. I anticipate getting you comments on Monday
4723-2001. If there are questions, please advise. Thanks for your
patience. By the way, the 5WM folks asked me about the B& B topsoil
application status. Have we received anything further from them since
your AAI letter? Thanks
of 1 4/23/2001 9:23 AM

A+� 'tool
• Log In #: o
DPR/RRS Mining Permit Application Review
RRS Contact: M Gt.►-1T V
Name of project: � as Ssnl
County:
?a eCh Qk'i
Proposed activity is (V is not within 5 miles of a public park or recreation area.
�.4
If yes, identify the park: F;KL � LM4 � 7 +tC Rt - /ALL %� '� G J &H III
Manager/agency name: Falls Lake State Rec. Area Blue Jay Point County Park
David Kellam, Park Supt. Chris Snow
(contact name):
(phone; fax ):
(email):
Review conducted by:
919-676-1027/733-3499
[e-mail]
919-870-4333/870-4327
[e-mail]
Date:
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS WITH YOUR REVIEW/COMMENTS.
YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL YOUR COMMENTS TO:
Susan.EdwardsAnemail.net and [e-mail]
TUANKS!
Return form and materials to:
Nancy Adams
DENR/Division of Parks & Recreation
1615 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1615
(Please Print on Yellow Paper)

North Carolina . • 0 �r.Sv
�
Department of Environment and Natural Resources rDivision of Water Resources ©4A
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
John Morris, Director
Memorandum
To: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
From: Greg L. Rudolph
Ground Water Bran h
Division of Water Resources
Re: Mining Permit Modification Request for Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Date: 4/9/01
Based on the information contained in the modification request for the above
referenced site, I foresee no obvious or immediate adverse effects on potable ground
water supplies or ground water quality in the area of the Raleigh Quarry. This statement
is contingent that construction details described in the modification request meets the
approval of the Division of Land Resources.
;�1ffAAt
pEr��
LAND OLUAUT SECTION
. 1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Forth Carolina, 27699-1611
Phone: 919 — 733-4064 1 FAX: 919 — 733-3558 1 Internet: www.newater.org
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED 1 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE
TEL:[phone]
•
Apr 16'01
0
13:55 No.001 P.01
FAX COVER
Fars Lake Office
Date
Number of pages including cover sheet,
To:
CC_ `
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Nabltat Conservation Program
11421-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, NC 27522
From:
Phone [phone]
Fax Phone [phone]

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE
TEL:[phone] Apr 16'01 13:55 No.001 P.02
ICI IN orth Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Charles K Fullwood, Executive Director
lu' Z iiA11 DilLl
TO: Susan B. Edwards, Mining Program Secretary
Land uality Section
FROM: Danielle R. Pender, piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 16 April 2001
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.,
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02, Wake County, North Carolina
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
subject permit renewal. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Mining
Act of 1971 (as amended, 1982)(G.S. 74-76 through 74-68 15 NCAC 5),
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc, is requesting a modification to add eight acres of
affected acreage to their granite -mining permit. The proposed modification involves the removal
of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of material to be used on a nearby highway project. A
level bench cut into the side of the hill will result from the removal, and the site will then be used
as a disposal area for settled sludge. The Neuse River drains the site. We concur with the project
modification provided that the ininimum 100-foot undisturbed, forested buffer along all streams,
watercourses, and wetlands are maintained. This 100-foot buffer will protect water quality and
provide an adequate travel corridor for wildlife species. In addition, water discharges from the
Ni-jt;it sii(; shUtdid Irm l)ropo1-iiona11to the size of the receiving stream, and all discharges should
comply with NPDES permit requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be
maintained at or below the permit requirenne,nt. High water discharge rates and turbidity can
negatively impacl aquatic and fisheries resources within and downstream of the projccl area.
Excessive siii and sedintwa luads can have numerous detrimental effects can aquatic resources
;.aiiiiig ndtairc35; I.lIVIJIV❑ VL IIi1:lI1u T15hCT1CS = 172 i ;v,ail Service Center • 1CdIP.1611, 1\'t 17699•1 %l l
Telephonic; [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Apr 16'01 13:56 No.001 P.03
Page 2
16 April 2001
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
Permit No. 92.02
including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gi [1s of agUatic
species. Implementation of these conditions should minimize impacts to aquatic and fisheries
resources at and downstream of the project site.
'!'hank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this modification. If you need
additional infomiation, please contact our office at [phone],
cc: Steve llowiler, Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.

.1 0
April 4, 2001
Mr. Chris Hite
Accictant Mininn SnQcin ict
Land Quality Section
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1612
Re: Mine Permit Modification Application
Raleigh Quarry - Permit # 92-02
Dear Mr. Hite:
•
ii<7
ii6!
"° Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
PO. Sox 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
-Pursuant
to : your' letter of. --'March 28; `2001;-enclosed please";.ttnd"'aw"checK for
$50.00--to covei the additional fee fo.r,,processing -our application,ito modify -.the mine
permit ifor the Raleigh Quarry (Permit # 92-02).
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
r�
Steve Howiler, P. E
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
I 1I -� J 200I
QY(-,

PAY
■a ■
■■■
'"Hanson
HANSON AGGREGATES SOMEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SURE 1240
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30084
VOID AFTER 60 DAYS
62-4/311
6042�
DOLLARS
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.'
MELLON BANK, N.A., PH"DELPHIA, PA (0310)
PAYABLE THROUGH MELLON BANK {OE) N.A., MWINOTON, OE--

r j
�1
i
t
J
MINING
CHECKLIST FOR
ROUTING
Applicant's Name:Afvx 1F s &.1o64 Project Name:
C.
Applic./Permit No.: '?,?-daCounty: 1,A I Date Received: ,4,/
Reviewer: Z 1/5 River Basin Name: evt
❑ New ❑ Renewal Ci I40 ification (inside permit boundaries
p )
❑ Modification (outside permit boundaries) ❑ Tram sfers� El Release
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional Information gee Needed: $_°o
6�
ee Received: $_
f lcaoc route entire anniication nackaQe to:
C►t� /P/cii'�? Regional Office (2 complete copier,: attarh the "I Q5 Reglonal
Office Mining/Application Review Checklist" to one copy and attach k> the DWQ and DAQ
"Mining Application Review Form" to the other copy: send both co ie5 to the Regional Engineer)
Date: Route S c)I Reed
2 RD'vision of Water Resources Date: Routed �� Rec'd
Wildlife Resources Commi55fon Date: Routed �r-, Rec'd
❑ U5 fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only new applications and modification reque5t5 that add land to the permit)
ivision of Parks & Recreation Date: Rou
Rec'd
El NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed
'ZRec'd
(Only new applications and modification requests that add land to the permit)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed
Rec'd
(Only new applications)
❑ Other: Date: Routed
Rec'd
*5uoren5e Date for Comments: /6P00
(no later than 25 days
from receipt)
@'Please note the following:
moo/ dd�,!/ /�Pdi P �,J sr•9iL r'Ort1�1/.�T. �/�Ai1�'f � /�.'-���
All 5p44tC �'s flr

North Carolina
Department of Environfent and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
March 28, 2001
Mr. Steve Howiler, P.E.
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
I . O. UoX OOPS
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Mining Permit No. 92-02
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County
Dear Mr. Howiler:
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
We are in receipt of your mining permit application for the Raleigh Quarry in Wake County (Permit
No. 92-02 and check number 60317 for $50.00. A modification to your mining permit will require
the submittal of a nonrefundable $100.00 processing fee. An additional $50.00 is required to
process your mining permit modification.
We regret that we cannot complete processing the above materials until we have received the
necessary fee as authorized by the 1990 North Carolina General Assembly in G.S. 143R-290 and as
set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission 15A NCAC
513.0012. We will continue processing the paperwork but cannot complete the modification request
until the appropriate fee has been received by this office.
Please remit by check or money order $50.00 payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. DO NOT SEND CASH. Payments should be mailed to:
Attention- Mr. C_.hris Hite
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1612
Full payment must be received by this office within 30 dam or your materials will be returned
unprocessed.
Land Quality Section [phone] Fax [phone] Geological Survey Section [phone] Fax [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources [phone] Fax: [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Steve Howiler
March 28, 2001
n_
Page G
A copy of the fee schedule as adopted by the North Carolina Mining Commission is attached. The
section pertaining to the materials that you have submitted has been highlighted. See the fee schedule
for further explanation. If you have any additional questions, please contact our office at (919) 733-
4574.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
74��a;�7u .9. 64val 4-/ /
Susan B. Edwards
Land Quality Section
/SBE
Attachment

North Carolina 0
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist March 28, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Danielle Pender
■ "UAL"t tivuav� ru�lV11 rlVb'i�Lltl I.VOCC11I1dtQr
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Susan B. Edwards
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
•
Arn
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by
April 16, 2001 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time
limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control
measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater
fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and
time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly appreciated.
Please contact Mr. Chris Hite at [phone] if you have any questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
Land Quality Section [phone] Fax [phone] Geological Survey Section [phone] Fax [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources [phone] Fax:[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -- 50°/u RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

North Carolina •
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
i T%<U%'.ii 2U, GV V 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources
FROM: Susan B. Edwards . ; v
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
F05WA
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having an
unduly adverse effect on potable groundwater supplies (G.S. 74-51 (2)) or groundwater quality
(G.S. 74-51(3)). Please respond by April 16. 2001 so that we may enmplete. o r review Of this
request within our statutory time limits.
Any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on potable
groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to have any
r econ, Lll Uations you may provide l'Ur permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality.
If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the
person submitting this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of
your comments to the person noted in the application.
PLEASE RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH
YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your co ltinued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Mr. Chris Hite at (919)
733-4574 if you have'any questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
Land Quality Section [phone] Fax [phone] Geological Survey Section [phone] Fax [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources [phone] Fax: [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 500A RECYCLED! lo% POsT CONSUMER PAPER

North Carolina
Department of Environ ent and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
March 28, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Phillip McKnelly, Director
1.Ulvision of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Susan B. Edwardsning Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
0 9
NCDENR
Division of Land Resources
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification Request for Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry - Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the first three pages of the mining permit
modification request and a location map for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having a
significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park, forest or recreation area
(G.S. 74-51 (5)). Please respond by April 16 2001 so that we may complete our review of this
request within our statutory time limits_
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and
modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control
measures to ensure that they are sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation.
However, any comments your agency can provide regarding effects on publicly owned parks,
forests or recreation areas would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a. site
inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a
convenient date and time. A lso, pleaSe send a copy of youi cuiinients to the person noied in the
application. RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR
REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is greatly appreciated.
Please contact Mr. Chris Hite at [phone] if you have any questions.
/SBE
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley
Land Quality Section [phone] Fax [phone] Geological Survey Section [phone] Fax [phone]
16t2 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Division of Land Resources [phone] Fax: [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER — 50% RECYCLED 1 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

•
IYlalldl 19, 2UV I
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. BOX 27687
Raleigh N.C. 27611
Re: Mine Permit Modification Application
Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal Area
Raleigh Quarry -- Permit # 92-02
Dear Ms. Wehner:
• ■■o
■oo
"'Hanson
MAR d Z9B1
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Enclosed please find the following as part of an application by Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. to modify the mine permit for the Raleigh Quarry
(Permit # 92-02):
1) - four copies of the first section of the mine permit application form
(pages 1-5)
2) - four copies of the general quarry site plan showing the location of
the eight acres covered by this modification request, and mine plan
and reclamation plan drawings covering this proposed modification
3) - four copies of the design calculations for the erosion and sediment
control measures
4) - four copies of the county highway map showing the location of the
site
5) - check for $50.00 to cover the permit application fee
This project involves the removal of +1-100,000 CY of borrow material by a
contractor from the eigh cres covered b the permit modification for use on a nearby
highway project. This borrow removal should completed this year, leaving a level
bench cut into the side of the hill. This site will then be used as a disposal area for
settled sludge that is periodically dipped from the plant washwater recycle basins.
The mine plan drawing for this modification shows the final contours after
removal of the borrow material. Details for construction of erosion and sediment control
measures to protect the adjacent Neuse River from adverse impacts both during clearing
a11- 00110w rrrr;�yal nperMt.vns :re mien _shown The plan is to provide retention for GII
runoff up to the 25-yr. storm event and use this water as make-up water in our adjacent
plant wastewater recycle basins. Runoff from events greater than the 25-yr. storm will
be held for varying periods of time (dependent on runoff) to allow for settling of solids
prior to release.

The reclamation plan drawing shows the final contours to which settling basin
sludge (pond dippings) will be graded over a period of years. The retention ponds will
f'A......1ie — filn-011 rIiCing —.- penod wand pvrtivnV of the dlpposoi area 111II VW IN %11
graded and grassed, with erosion and sediment control measures (slope drains,
diversion swales, etc.) installed as required to direct runoff away from high erosion
hazard areas, as well as adjacent undisturbed areas, and into the retention ponds.
A sequence of work activities and erosion and sediment control measure
installation, designed to reduce as much as possible the potential impact to the Neuse
River, is Included in both the design notes and the project drawings.
We trust that this information is sufficient to allow your department to process our
application; however, should you require any additional information, do not hesitate to
contact the writer. Please direct all correspondence regarding this application to this
office.
Sincerely,
Hanson Aggre tes Southeast, Inc.
Steve Howiler, P.E
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
Enclosures

0

62-4/311'
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE P~AY, SUITE 1240
TUCKER, %ORGIA,%W VOID AFTER 60 DAYS 60317
"0 491
PAYABLE TWOUGH MaLON SAW (M Wk. VAUJINGTON. De
0
0

_S
1.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
ENT-,
L.�—�- � v.. • ;'r• cr"�4C�
Name of Mine Raleigh Qu Y County
2. Name of Applicant* Hanso'n Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Wake
3. Permanent address for receipt of officiai,mail** Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
P. 0. Box 13983 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3983
Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address P.O. Boot 60186 10501 Capital Boulevard Wake Forest, NC 27661
Telephone 9I9-556--4011
5.. Mine Manager Ball Maccini_
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We frilly understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause to revoke the
permit.
Date 3 / 19 / 01
Print Name Justin E. Williams
Title president
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the n=e that must br. indicatCd on the
reclamatinn hand (sccu� rjW that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a 1�p�L� ap lication or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of
anv ctin� nlPmPnta�infnrmatinn rPrnw,r i }+v the Department. d111 nnpct;pn„c W■■ ho er1.t�Med . m-' n a
J np.e ent d "J y"`^" aaus v.. Qiaaaa wacu �� Qia r�Ziir eY
maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

,t
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
■ NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresnon_ding;
detailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
AncwPr all of the fnlinw►n ino that arly-
-CP YY
1. a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered
by the permit this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: Acres
leased: Property owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be
based upon):
C. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: 92-02 Total permitted acreage: 437.0
Does the modification involve acreage within the reviously approved permitted boundary?
Yes % No—. If yes, indicate the acreage ' to �e covered by this 0modification (this is the
acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No % . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes_ No (if no, a "minor modification"
fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes, indicate the
acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acres a to be added
to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon:
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage:
■ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT
TO BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE
NOTED ABOVE
2. Indicate the approximate longitude and latitude in de ees-minutes-seconds, of the center of the mine
site: LONGITUDE (add-mm-ss):78 3 Quadrangle: KIAM Fz r r'
T A V •ii V•.+l.! 1Vruff" uu). aY7e B)Wi 1.
3. Name of all materials mined: Granite
-2-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
X Shovel & Truck x
* 5. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 400' Reference elevation:
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) "0
340'
v. Has any areas) at this site been ud cd in the past? YeS " No II no, proceed to Question 7.
a. Acreage�of previously affected land(s) at present site that has not been reclaimed:
acres (identify all areas on your mine map(sl).
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted?_ LAwrent operator under existing permit.
C.
d.
e.
acres
fy ail -areas on your mine map(s)).
and by whom was this activity conducted?
Do you wish t� exclude any areas noted in 6a or c from this permit application?
Yes No If yes, how much? acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
7. Present (pre -mining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry - 245 acres Fish/Wildlife acres
ncC AU-211on acres Other 1"" acres [apeciry use: VULis[ lffg tt�Y
* 8. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed (estimate acreage for each) :
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry 142 acres Fish/Wildlife acres
Recreation�acres Other nacres (Specify use: Fresh water M=lv for local
- mLnicipalities10
9. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum):
B. MAPS
1. Four (4) copies of the county highway maps and four (4) copies of all mine maps and reclamation
maps shall be submitted with each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
Clearly label and mark the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
-3-

P
pm
140.-
10
D�711111 f I , I 6 MMM t
_�w
N—
C— V Location
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry
dk, w_s
lot,,

March 19, 2001
Ms. Judy Wehner
N. C. Dept. Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh N.C. 27611
Re: Mine Permit Modification Application
Borrow Removal/Sludge Disposal Area
Raleigh Quarry — Permit # 92-02
Dear Ms. Wehner:
hi�►t r � ?991
■■■
■ ■ ■ Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Enclosed please find the following as part of - an application by Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. to modify the mine permit for the Raleigh Quarry
(Permit # 92-02):
1) - four copies of the first section of the mine permit application form
(pages 1-5)
2) - four copies of the general quarry site plan showing the location of
the eight acres covered by this modification request, and mine plan
and reclamation plan drawings covering this proposed modification
3) - four copies of the design calculations for the erosion and sediment
control measures
4) - four copies of the county highway map showing the location of the
site
5) - check for $50.00 to cover the permit application fee
This project involves the removal of +1-100,000 CY of borrow material by a
contractor from the res covered b the permit modification for use on a nearby
highway project. This borrow removal shout a completed this year, leaving a level
bench cut into the side of the hill. This site will then be used as a disposal area' for
settled sludge that is periodically dipped from the plant washwater recycle basins.
The mine plan drawing for this modification shows the final contours after
removal of the borrow material. Details for construction of erosion and sediment control
measures to protect the adjacent Neuse River from adverse impacts both during clearing
and borrow removal operations are also shown. The plan is to provide retention for all
ruuw w ufc c.5-yr. swrm event and use this water CIS IIIdRC-LIF] YYii[Cr to our adjacent
plant wastewater recycle basins. Runoff from events greater than the 25-yr. storm will
be held for varying periods of time (dependent on runoff) to allow for settling of solids
prior to release.

The reclamation plan drawing shows the final contours to which settling basin
sludge (pond dippings) will be graded over a period of years. The retention ponds will
continue to function during this period and portions of the disposal area will 'be final
graded and grassed, with efos[on and SMWirnellt conuvi measures (a+ope%W d anise,
diversion swales, etc.) installed as required to direct runoff away from high erosion
hazard areas, as well as adjacent undisturbed areas, and into the retention ponds.
A �..+ ..� ...'++1i �e.+i.lilen�. �nrl nrncinn MnAi C�[�ill1P11t [`llrltl[al ►11Aa3urB
n aNuenWO u1 nv9n PVllt Rf4�7 amend Vrvvw„
installation, designed to reduce as much as possible the potential impact to the Neuse
River, is included in both the design notes and the project drawings.
We trust that this information is sufficient to allow your department to process our
application; however, should you require any additional information, do not hesitate to
contact the writer. Please direct all correspondence regarding this application to this
office.
Sincerely,
Hanson Agg tes
Southeast, Inc.
Steve Howiler,'P.E
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
Enclosures

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRC
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of Mine Raleigh Quarry County
Wake
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official .mail** Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
P. 0. Box 13983 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3983
Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address P.O. Box 60186 10501 Capital Boulevard Wake Forest, NC 27661
Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Bill Maccini
We hereby certifyy that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause to revoke the
permit.
Date 3/ 19/01
Print Name Justrn E. Wiiiiams
Title President
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must hQ indicated on the
[pclamation bond (srcurj l that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for apermit within 60 days of receipt
of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of
anv suppllemental information required by the Department. Ail questions must be addressed and all required
maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
■ NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining
operation for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding,
ailed mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
Answer all of the following that apply:
a. If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered
by the permit this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of +h.s acreage, how mT.:ch .s o;vna_ and _o 1h .s leased? Acres owned: Acres
leased: Property owner if leased:
b. If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the minim permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be
based upon):
c. If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit
No.: 92-02 Total permitted acreage. 437.0 -
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes X No . If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by t� modification (this is the
acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No X . If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes_ No� (if no, a "minor modification"
fee of $50.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes, indicate the
acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acrea a to be added
to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon:
d. If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
A +U •�+nl ln.raw.11% n�o...ro --.,-.-A 1%.r ♦U- . ;..... a. *Ar'-..- Tlk- -: 7�T- .
anu Lue LVLa1 `VV%1 a11J aL.1T+a�'fi VVV%11L+u Vr LU-- exiSU"r, k/e11L11L. LULL 11r, K-CIL 1L 1VV..
Total permitted acreage:
■ SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT
TO BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE
NOTED ABOVE
2. Indicate the approximate longitude and latitude in degrees -minutes -seconds, of the center of the mine
site: LONGITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 78 32 __ 41 Quadrangle: N1&6_ ri 2 rr�
LATITUDE (dd-mm-ss): 35 --=---337- River Basin: Nf-aiE
3. Name of all materials mined: Granite
-2-

•
0
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Front-end Loader & Truck
Dragiine & Truck Self -loading Scraper Other (explain)
X Shovel & Truck X
5. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) Reference elevation:
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet)
340'
6- Has anv area(sl at LiS sit - hePn min in the nast7 Vpc X Nn Tf nn r%rr%r•PPr1 rn nnaot;-- '7
--✓ -♦ t.-..... v, j..avvv�.�a rW �u�.ouvu 1.
a. Acreage9of previously affected land(s) at present site that has not been reclaimed:
acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s�}.
b. When and by whom was this activity conducted? ent operator under existing permit.
C.
(identify all areas on
d. When and by whom
y affected land at resent sit
your mine map(s)�.
was this activity conducted?
acres
e. Do you wish q exclude any areas noted in 6a or c from this permit application?
Yes No A. If yes, how much? acres (identify all areas on your mine map(s)).
7. Present (pre -mining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry 245 acres Fish[Wildlife acres
Recreation acres Other 7137—arrP1z I.SneriN lice• Existing Otmrr% �)
8. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland acres Pasture acres Forestry 142 acres Fish/Wildlife acres
Recreation--M acres Other nacres (Specify 'use: Fresh water g=ly for local
municipalities to
9. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum):
B. MAPS
1. Four (4) copies of the county highway maps and four (4) copies of all mine maps and reclamation
maps shall be submitted with each permit application.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
[phone]
Clearly label and mark the location of your muting operation on the county highway maps.
-3-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on
the maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits
can only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote
those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps
must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the
following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate Iimits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100 year flood lain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land.
p. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
b. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales must, at a minimum, meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-99 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
100-499 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
500+ Acres 1 inch = 200 feet
-4-

•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of
tailings/sediment ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other
major aspect of the mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining
permit. A table/chart similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
13
Stockpiles
35
WactenilPc
36
Processing Area/Haul Roads
40
Mine Excavation
68 + 8 * 76
Other
TOTAL =: 200.0 with this modification
NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -
SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED
PLICATION WILL NOT
BEICONSIDEREDCOMPLETE WITHOUT AS THROUGHOUT LLERELEEVVANT ITETHIS MS BEING ADEQUATELY
ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
-5-

Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Ralef gh (Niarry
Fva�f ■ M ��Mf ■
Erosion and Sediment Control Design Calculations
for
Mine Permit #92-02 Modification
Addition of 8-acre Borrow/Settling Basin Sludge Disposal Area
Submitted to
N. C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
March, 2001
�yp,R
Prepared by.
Steve Howiler, P.E.
Environmental Manager, SC/NC
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.
� .v. Buis a►o
Cheraw, S.G. 29520
843-537-7883
IF1Fli111411tiit

Table of Contents
Section I - Calculate 25-yr. storm peak runoff, determine runoff
retention times/volumes and sediment storage
required in ponds. - Page 1 of 5
Section II - Size drain pipe to plant settling basin system fresh
water return pond - Page 2 of 5
Section III - Size outfall structure for + 25-yr. storm event - Page 3 of 5
Section IV - Size temporary slope drains for finished pond
sludge disposal pile - Page 3 of 5
Section V - Check runoff from east side of railroad and size
culvert to cant' this storm flow under subject area - Page 4 of 5
Section VI - Erosion and Sediment Control Measure Installation
Sequence and General Sequence of Work - Page 5 of 5

Pg. 1 of 5
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry
Mine Permit Modification Application - March 2001
Runoff Calculations and Erosion & Sediment Control Design for +1-8 acre Borrow Area and
Subsequent Settling Basin Sludge Disposal
Reference: N.C. Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual
Using TR-55 for calculation of Maximum Expected Runoff from 50-yr. Storm Event.
Runoff to the Neuse river will be controlled as follows:
Two retention ponds will be constructed along the lower toe of the disturbed area. Joined by a
ditch, they will be sized so as to in combination contain the 25-yr. storm runoff. A piped
connection to the plant's settling basin system fresh water return pond will be used to release
the accumulated 25-yr.runoff for use at the plant. Runoff from up to a 50-yr. storm will be
treated by settling in the retention pond and then discharged via suitably sized outfall
structure.
1. Calculate 25-yr. storm peak runoff, determine runoff retention times/volumes
and sediment storage required in ponds. Maximum runoff will occur after timber has
been harvested and borrow excavation begins, culminating in bare, leveled site.
A. — Base Information for Peak Runoff Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 8 Acres
Hydraulic length = 625'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +1- 8%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-1 acres pond near discharge of watershed) = 8
Soil Group "B" and "C":
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) - Soil Group B = 0.93 Acs. (12%)
Open space, grass cover 50-75% (borrow area cut slopes) -
Soil Group C = 1.35 Acs. (17%)
Newly graded area (borrow pit) - Soil Group "C" = 4.62 Acs. (57%)
Ponds = 1.10 Acs. 1i 4%)
8.00 Acs. 100%
B. — Calculation of Peak Discharge Rate for the Contributine Drainaae Area
1) Calculate average curve number (CN) using Table 8.03b.
% Area x CN
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) - 12% x 55 = 660
Open space, grass cover 50-75% (borrow area cut slopes) - 17% x 79 = 1343
Newly graded area (borrow pit) - 57% x 93 = 5301
Pods - 14% x 1uuu = 1400
100% = 8704

0
•
C:N = 8704/100 = 87.04 USE 87
Pg. 2 Of 5
2) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.03k, the rainfall amount for the 25-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 6.5 in.
From Table 8.03c, by double interpolation, runoff depth = 5.00 in.
3) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 625':
equivalent drainage area = 6.2 acres
From Figure 8.03p, 3%-8% slope, CN=87: Peak rate of runoff = 9.1 cfs/inch
Q, = 9.1 cfs/inch x 5,00 inches = 45 cfs
Q2 = 45cfs x 8 Acs/6.2Acs = 58 cfs
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Q2 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
5) Adjust peak discharge rate Q3for average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 8% average slope, 8 acres, by interpolation:
adjustment factor = 0.91
Q4=58x0.91=53cfs
6) Adjust peak discharge Q4for surface ponding
From Table 8.03e, ratio = 8:1, at disharge, 25-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.68
Qp 25,24 = 53 cfs x 0.58= 31 cfs
C. - Calculate required 25-yr. storm runoff volume
(5.00 in. (runoff depth) x 6.95 acs.) + (6.5 in. rainfall to pond x 1 A 0 acs) = 3.49 ac-ft =
152,000 cf
Available volume = 1400' x 3.5' x (40 + 26)/2 = 162,000 cf
D. - Calculate required sediment stor ege-volume (1800cf/ac of drainage is required):
Total area = 8 ac x 1800 cf = 14,400 cf req'd.
Available = (218.5'-216') x (20+30)/2 x 1400' = 87,500 cf
:.. �.�a "r aiPi pipe iv jriaTic`.-�v ai iry i�ia�iFr �ys-iearrr iiissrr viiaier return pond
Setting inlet invert of drain pipe at elevation = +/-218.5, assuming we have held the 25-
yr. storm event, we will have a total of 152,000 cf of stored water. Planning to drain this
acf'111 Mated Water of? in A rJ nuo 7} 1n Mre/Anti - An Fero ta nerved 4- A—;-
.aw -% iv InaFaIay - vv Inp,,u
■rc II %J 4v LIQII}

pg. 3 of 5
152,000 cf / 60 hrs = 2533 cf/hr = 0.70 cfs. This will be the make-up water supply (+/-10% of
total usage) for this period.
From Manning Formula, 8" steel pipe (n=0.013) on 0.5'/100' grade, yielding 0.8 cfs
r�n�nifio
vul.rra ..aJ.
111. Size outfall structure for +25-yr. storm event
A. — Calculate aroximate 50- r. storm runoff
From Figure 8.031, the rainfall amount for the 50-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 7.2 in.
From Table 8.03c, by double interpolation, runoff depth = 6.68 in.
Q4 = 5.68/5.00 x 53 cfs = 60 cfs
Q 30,24 = 60 x 0.62 (surface ponding factor, 50-yr. storm) = 37 cfs
B. - Use rip-raR lined overflow channel. Determine mean rip -rap size, channel x-
section, and flow depth for Q = 37 cis
S = 10'/40' = 0.25 fttft
Try B = 6' to hold down on size of rip -rap and do
Try Z=3
1) From Figure 8.051: do = 0.55' & d50c = 1.05' Use d50c = 12" and dmax = 18"
Rip -rap lined channel will have 6' wide bottom, with 3:1 side slopes, depth = V, approximately
50' long. Rip -rap will have d50 size of 12" and dmax = 18". Depth of rip -rap will be 18" x 1.5 =
27". Line subgrade with filter fabric.
Channel will dump into head -killer basin. Basin dimensions = 18' wide x 20' long x 3' deep.
Use 12" of #4 stone beneath rip -rap. Check dam outlet.
IV. Size temporary slope drains for finished pond dippings disposal
Using rational formula: Q = CIA where,
C = 0.50 for bare packed rough soil
T, _ +/-7 min. for max. height above outlet = 1' and max. length of travel = 300'
1 (from Figure 8.03e —10-yr return period) = 7 in/hr.
A = 1.2 acres (max.)
Q = (0.50)(7 in/hr)(1.2 acs) = 4.2 cfs
USinnd-nrr�inn4orl DE pipe with n — A n,)') nr, 7•k slope 1—A 55f*M4\ D" ill
..a y.+wv ".f _ u+ .. — v.v�� v4I a A_ Ow�lG 1—V..nu1lf, all V pipe `vrlll carry:
Q = AV = A (1 A9/n)(R)2m(S)'n
Q = (0.34sf)(67.73)(0.34/2.10) 213(0.5) 1� = 4.84 cfs Use 8" alone drains.

E
L_J
Page 4 of 5
V. Check runoff from east side of railroad and size culvert to carry this storm
flow under subject area
A. — Base Informatlon for Peak Runoff Calculation
Location: Raleigh, N. C.
Drainage Area = 12 Acres
Hydraulic Length = 800'
% hydraulic length modified - none
Average slope = +/- 7.5%
Ratio of drainage area to ponded area (+/-0.4 acres pond near discharge of watershed) = 30:1
Soil Group °B°
Woodland, good stand (undisturbed area) — CN = 55
B. - Calculation of Peak Discharge Rate for the Contributing Drainage Area
1) Determine runoff depth
From Figure 8.031, the rainfall amount for the 50-year, 24-hr. storm at Raleigh = 7.2 In.
From Table 8.03c, by double interpolation, runoff depth = 2.23 In.
2) Determine peak rate of runoff for the design storm by adjusting for watershed shape
From Figure 8.03n, for hydraulic length = 800':
equivalent drainage area =10 acres
From Figure 8.03p, 3%-8% slope, CN=55, 10 acs: Peak rate of runoff = 8.0 cfs_I_inch
Q, = 8.0 cfs/inch x 2.23 inches =17.8 cfs
QZ = 17.8cfs x 12 Acs/10Acs = 21.4 cfs
3) Adjust peak discharge rate Q2 for percent impervious area and percent hydraulic length
modified - none
4) Adjust peak discharge rate Wor average watershed slope
From Table 8.03d, 7.5% average slope, 11.5 acres, by interpolation:
adjustment factor =1.00
Q4=21.4x1.0=21.4cfs
5) Adjust peak discharge Q4 for surface ponding
F,vii, T Mile 8.03e, ftltKl = JU: 1, at disnarge, a0-yr.:
Adjustment factor = 0.75
Op 25,24 = 21.4 cfs x 0.75 = 16, cis

•
Page 5 of 5
C - Size Culvert to Carry Storm Flow Under SLIblect Area
Available grade = 16% (16' drop in +I- 100')
Using RCP pipe (n = 0.013)
a 15" culvert will carry +/-25 cfs at 16% grade. > 15 cfe — okl
W Erosion and Sedi►nentation Control Measure Installation Sequence and
General Sequence of Work
Description and Sequence of Activity
- Install silt fencing on +1- 212' contour
around lower edge of site
- install temporary rip -rap check dam below
p v�r �a. viivaii
- Cut timber
- Clear & grub area for construction of retention
ponds and 16" RCP culvert
- Install 15' RCP under area
- Construct outfall head -killer basin
- Dig retention ponds/construct retention dike
- Seed retention dike and slopes of pond
- Construct +25-yr. storm outfall
- Install overflow pipe to plant fresh water
pump pond
- Clear & grub entire area
- Remove borrow from area
- Backfill area with pond dippings
(10-yr. process)
- Clean sediment from retention ponds as needed
- Install slope drains as needed
- Install drainage swales and pipes (as shown
on plans) as necessary to divert runoff from
disturbed areas into retention ponds
- Establish grass on final slopes as created In
accordance with anpraved vapptatinn plan
FPS Activity or Work Activity
E&S
E&S
W
W
W
E&S
E&S
E&S
E&S
E&S
W
W
W
E&S
E&S
E&S
PRR

078* 34'0.00"
W1 'Alk 1 1 1078* 33'0.00"WI
k 078* 32
1
w
1
z
1,`
Qr-
S-
d
1 71
?
, Ta�
U C
V-
35a
7
1P
z
z
d
q
0
00
•y tlL/y
r
O
0
So
z
q izi
VA,,
U
1078' 34-1
0-00' W1 1 078' 33,10-00-
078* 32
0.00" V�
Name: WAKE FOREST Location: 035* 55'38.8" N 078* 33'00-9- W
Date'. 3/27/101
Sc4 :ale: I Inc,', equals 2000 fe-ei
Capy0ght (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

DATE, TO ASSISTANT
LOGGED IN
DATE - TO" JWSAN
MINING CHECKLIST FO�t RQUUNG
Z�tC h °Cam . r / f
Company .� �?"�S � Project Name
Permit No . 9,i- o J�, ^ �-� County 3/ -c) }T 7: -r_5A Date Received n 135"
Reviewer
Please make copies of check to include with Central office and
Field Office files and login checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal JE Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
f12Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
-L%I Fee Received: Amount ,--6 ` o
Please route to:
Field Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and'History
❑ Other:
Date Routed -
02�-
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: i' =lei (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
EPlease note the following:
'l �� /.Ir,• � f 1
*SUSAN Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

11130
HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.
100 CRESCENT CENTRE PARKWAY, SUITE 1240 58119
TUCKER, GEORGIA 30084 VOID AFTER 60 DAYS
770 491 2777
PAV `oh�e rsui�:mbf,, r5nandan rpt, nni I ARR,
DATE
TO THE ORDER OF
CHECK NO.
AMOUNT
HANSON AGGREGATES.SOUTKEAST, INC.'
MELLON BANK, HA. PHILADELPHIA. PA (0310)
PAYABLE THROWN MELLON BANK (DE) N.A.. MLMMTON, BE
E
w

Anril 2A 1 QQQ
• Now
■■■
m"Hanson
` MAY 0 31999
By
Ms. Judith A. Wehner
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P 0 Box 27687
Raleigh N.C. 27611-7687.
Re: Corporate Name Chas;
Dear Ms. Wehner:
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc, and Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. is
pleased to respond to your letter dated April 16, 1999 in which you request we
complete the title page and land entry agreement page of the application form to
expedite the name change process. As requested we have completed the title
page and land entry agreement form and enclose them duly signed by an officer
of the corporation. We also enclose our check for fifty ($50.00) dollars for the
requested permit fees.
Should you require any additional information do not hesitate to contact
the writer.
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Hanson Aggregates �ecker, Inc.
Il „
i
N.F. Wills
Environmental Manager
Encl.
Letterslncm inelnsmechange2

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine hi I& Irl County. � s
2. Name of Applicant* Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail**
P. 0. Sox 13983 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Telephone [phone]
4. Mine Office Address
Telephone
5. Mine Manager
We hereby certify that all details contained in this
of our knowledge. We fully understand that any
permit revocation.
***Signature.
Dr;—* AT
ELL"L i.
C. Whit
Title
President
Permit Application are true and correct to the best
willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for
Date 4-27-99
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond securi that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number._
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of
receipt of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the
J L.. fly—_ All
stflo n ' b as CCn.� n„ri n
filing of any supplemental information requueu by the LGjjdllu11V.UL. t% qutaaavu� mu' L.c a..urw�,.,. uu....11
required maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as
needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PEE4IT .
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the ent or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regu ar business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and -to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
i,s t„ , ar, , out ,�•lo„ atuinn �,hdch dhes nrw�tnr hoe f�;lpt! to rn(xlniete in the event a ix7nd fnlfeihlrE is
rruer w �.aiaj out •WliY�i44W.■ v vjrr vrva r-
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature
Print Name: -- C
Hans
Address P • 0.
I- IWhite
on Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Box 13983
APPLiCA ""-'"`-
Signature *
Print Name
Title: Presi0erit
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Company: Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Telephone 919-38Q-25Q0 Mine Name:
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
Inc.

NORTH CARONA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
. . DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
April 16, 1999
"!ML 01TAF11
IM
Mr. Nigel Wills
Hanson Aggregates East
P.O. Drawer 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc.
Hanson Anareaates Carolina. Inc.
Mining Permit Nos. 43-01, 43-06, 26-01, 43-21, 92-03, 32-01,
43-03, 98-13, 92-13, 29-13, 98-02, 32-07, 68-06, 51-05, 92-02
and 33-13
Dear Mr. Wills;
We have reviewed the name change request vour company
submitted for the above referenced mine site. However, the following
information is needed to continue processing your application:
1. A processing fee of $50.00 is needed for the Hanson
Aggregates Carolina, Inc. name change.
2. Please complete a new Page 1 and Land Entry Agreement
for Hanson Aggregates Becker, Inc. and a new Page 1 and
Land Entry Agreement for Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Inc. Return the completed forms to this office.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of
the items requested above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please
forward two (2) copies of the requested information to my attention at
the following address:
Land Quality Section
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
LAND QUALITY SECTION [phone] FAX (91S) 733.2876
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION [phone] FAX [phone]
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2761 1.7687 TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/I0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Ll
allJ
CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Wills
Page Twn
As required by 15A NCAC 513.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180
days from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information.
If you are unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must
submit information, in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not
be met and request that an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not
granted, a decision will be made to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the
information currently in the Department's files at the end of the 180 day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response,
we encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon
as possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application
sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
4
'- � -Q A"—
Judith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JW
cc: Mr. Toby Vinson, E.I.T.
Matthew Gantt, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.

DATE TO ASSISTANT �
LOC'�a ED IN
DATE TO SUSAN
MWIN• ��.r� �.fA'�.f�i1VVi3!
Cr CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING S '
Company Project Nam , s
y3-01,43-06 4-01 43-d21y �•3,�a-o�,y��3, �.ty' Gua4n�
OR� 2 Permit No. Count Date eceived 9
qZ-t3 ag-13, Rb-Oa. �� 0-7 -o(�, fl-DS, 9-021 %
Reviewer q.-i3
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewa+-El Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed
�ZKFe7-P
e Received: Amount
oMY
Please route to:
Field office
U Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed
J 4-L
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: qll (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend) / /_1
Please note the following:
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

March 12, 1999
• WIN
a�■
:' * Hanson
Hanson Aggregates East
Southeast Region
P.O. Box 848
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
Te! 843 537 7883
Fax [phone]
Mr. Tracy Davis
N.C. Dept. Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
r��
Land Quality Section i�,�;, n c� /7 �
P O Box 27687
Raleigh U.C. 27611-7687. M
5 1999
Re: Corporate Name Changes. ! By_
[l
Dear Mr. Davis:
Both Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates wish to inform
your office that they have undergone a corporate name change. Effective
immediately Becker Minerals and Benchmark Carolina Aggregates will be known
Ll.. 1A1.. ,Id .,L a4..,a �J -J- •- -19--i AL. - L-H.
as Hanson. r vc wo-ulu ask that you amend your r 1VW1 Ub LU rUl ICIR U IV lollowing
name changes:
The corporate name on the following Becker Minerals, Inc. mine permits
should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Becker Inc.
Senter (Permit #43-01), Gardner (Permit # 43-08) and Vander ( Permit # 26-01)
The corporate name on the following Benchmark Carolina Aggregates,
Inc. mine permits should be changed to Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Cape Fear (Permit # 43-21), Crabtree (Permit # 92-3), Durham (Permit # 32-01),
Elliott (Permit # 43-03), Elm City (Permit # 98-13), Holly Springs (Permit # 92-
13), Lexington (Permit # 29-13), Neverson (Permit # 98-02), North Durham
(Permit # 32-07), North Durhan (Permit # 68-06), Princeton (Permit # 51-05),
Raleigh (Permit # 92-02), and Rocky Mount (Permit #-Qe-,1).
Enclosed you will find replacement reclamation bonds for all our existing
rwrlamatinn hnnric Wp ack thnf vnl 1 raft lrn fhp hnnrllc vni 1 are ni Irrrnnfiv hnlriinn
once you have made the substitution. Also enclosed is the required permit fee for
the name change.

.. 01. *N 0
•
In the meantime, should you require any additional information do not
hesitate to contact the writer.
Yours Sincerely,
Hanson A at s East.
. II
Environmental Manager
Encl.
L ett e r S l nc m i n Al n a m cr h an o e

I
i
rr'M+r�•i�ealr', .... ..
:r-
xir ;:.rr
CAROLINA AGGREGATES, INC.
NORTH RALEIGH QUARRY
WAKE COUNTY
PERMIT MODIFICATION
AUGUST, 1997
17d 7�1
Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
i-50ENQ
CQVER
97E PLAN
A PO4 PLAN
940&ON rUNT OL PLAN
RECLAMATIDN PLAN
7YMAL CFAM SECTM
LIKXL.L AND" DEALS
CHANNEL PROILES
7P-1
Mp-1 - W-2
EC-1 - EC-2
W-1- FP-2
:)-1
>2
3-3-0-4
50VnlWND PFIC.rC'S W SW973LA

Igo
�
d"
Y®
q =9
j
i
� rt
G y
6
m R
• xrr
ti
�5

:
_�..
l r
�
a
'
a
g
4
LYe
D a
IC

3r
'4
am's 'It
4si
kv-
P4GTE- M WltED ALL OLJtAfty
AW 10 SE MN6MXTED AT A
BENCHMARK
IU CAROL94A AGGREGATES RECLAMATION PLAN
Nk�. ROLLEr41OVARRf
WAKE COUNTY
C4QA;44tC

Yl
A -
r= 909
J14- as�
--7 --- ----
2—
Benchmark
Carolina Agrogatom, Inc.
BENCHMARK
CAPOLKA AGICAEGATES, INC. TrMAL Cass SEc'nDN
fx— MLEJW OL*wy
NAa CCOM

�r—T-w• r.�- r- -. tom. _ --YF --_r - - -
I-
-
I
r
'
*IF ti
�� #�, �•� � r � itF2
� ��I Ito
MI
�0
a
I
-� O 0
I

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF' LAND RESOURCES
May 21, 1999
Mr. Nigel Wills, Environmental Manager
Hanson Aggregate East
Southeast Region
P.O. Drawer 84R
Cheraw, South Carolina 29520
RE: Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Wills:
Your recent request to have the corporate name changed from
SencIrnarl- Carolina Aggregates, Inc. to Hanson Aggregates Carolina,
Inc. on the following permits has been approved:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount II Quarry
43-03
Elliot Sand and Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand and Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton II Quarry
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
PleaseYattach this approval letter and permit cover pages to your
exi_Sting corresponding mining p rmitsJor future reference. The expiration
dates, mine names and permit numbers on the permit documents shall
remain the same as before these modifications.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does
not supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance
with any.applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
I LAND QUALITY SECTION 1919) 733.4574 FAX [phone]
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION f 9 1 9 1
733•2A?j Fer ,,; 733-090C
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2761 1.7687 TELEPHONE f919) 733-3d333 FAX f919) 71 5-6601
4 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER . 50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST -CON SU/A ER PAPER

0
Mr. Wills
Page Two
It is my understanding the Mining Permit Nos. 36-28 and 41-18 will not be
modified. Mining Permit No. 36-28 has not been disturbed and a release request from
your company will be forthcoming. In addition, Mining Permit No. 41-18 is currently in
the process of being transferred from your company to Martin Marietta Aggregates.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner
at [phone] should you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHGIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, P.E.
Mr. Toby Vinson, E.I.T.
Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Ms. Barbara Rote-WRC
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining Act of 1971,"
iviining Permit Rule 1 5A NCAC. 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Hanson Aggregates Carolina, Inc.
Dale ;g11 n. ,
IIa��,1, Quarry
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of all lands and
waters affected by this mining operation will receive the greatest practical degree of
protection and restoration.

State of North Carolin4l
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
JaaTlej . .L LU11t, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., F.E.
Director and State Geologist
October 20, 1997
Mr. James R. H. Sprinkle
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
P.O. Box 13983
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
RF' Permit Nn 9?-0?
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County
Neuse River Basin
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
A �..A
MCDENR
NORTH CARoumA DEPAR'mewr OF
EWROHMEFlT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
Your recent request to have the above referenced. mining permit modified has been
approved. The modification is to increase the affected acreage at the site to 176.5 acres as
indicated on the mine maps and associated sediment and erosion control plans dated August
1997. In addition, the modification allows the installation of the primary crusher station
inside the existing pit (including the development of shear walls required for the crusher
relocation), expansion of the pit area, development of,a-new entrance road and interior access
roads, construction of new visual barrier berms, a new plant arid pfocess area, and new
office/scale house, and the installation of related erosion and sedimentation control measures
ae 2nerifarl hu the nhnue refnrrenred mane Plpacp ante that rhanRar t^ tha o..;ot;n
�-na�uu— ---
and sediment control plan for the site may require modification of the approved
NPDES/Stormwater permit for this site. A copy of the modified permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based: primarily. upon -the initial.
application. Modifications were made as indicated by the modification request and as
required to insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date, mine
name and permit number shall remain the same as before the modification.
Geological Survey Section
Land Quality Section
[phone]
(919) 7334574
FAX: [phone]
FAX: (919)'733-2876.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled / 10% Post -Consumer Paper
�11

Mr. Sprinkle
October 20, 1997
Page Two
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local
zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations
lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 437.0 acres and' the amount of
land you are approved to disturb is 176.5 acres.
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at [phone] should you
have any questions concerning this matter.
Sinc ely,
Tracy E. avis, P.E.
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TED/j w
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Ms. Barbara Rote-WRC, w/enclosures
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ, w/enclosures

•
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
AQnr-hmark rarnl ina 4aarPcrat-P_ 7nr,
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County - Permit No.'..92'-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: November 25, 2002

• 0 Page 2 of 14
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is
hereby approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the
approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as'part of this
permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding
environment and for reclamation of the land and water affected by the
permitted mining operation. This permit is expressly conditioned upon
compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan.
nvwcvci, coiTipicE.cu pciLvl_mallcc of 'CAL -le approvcu rl.ctil is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file
with the Department, and may survive the expiration, revocation or
suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception: If another operator succeeds to the interest of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale,
lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the
permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his.:..
permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided
that both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining
h-4- yr,A 1-1-4- 4-7— oilr+ncoor�r nrnr��rtr �rrrccc+ 1-r�aoimc �lno rlif-i cn .-,� Fire
i1L L. Q4JAA 411p1 l LA. IJ LLl, 6. 4..VVVi Vr.\..LLL1..Vi c.Lyi... {...a 4V ul.: V4.L lilt. l-Ll .. LLLLl.1G0 V1 1. 11G
permittee with reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts
a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is £ai.ling'to achieve
the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may
give the operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or
suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as
incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in
addition to the above, the Department may institute other enforcement
procedures authorized'by law.

0 Page 3 of 14
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
August 15, 1990: This permit has been modified to include an
additional 105 acres of land (areas B and C) as indicated in the
modification request and aerial photograph received by the Land
Quality Section on November 3, 1989 on which only the construction of
the overburden disposal area shall be conducted as per the revised
Grading Plan dated March 1990 and received by the Land Quality Section
on June 20, 1990 with several stipulations.
November 22,_1991_: This permit has been modified to allow the on -site
remediation of petroleum contaminated soils as indicated in the
information dated September 5, 1991 and in accordance with the rules
and requirements promulgated by the Environmental Management
Commission.
November 25 1992: This permit has been modified to allow the
expansion of the existing pit and the construction of the
corresponding sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on
the Erosion Control Plan dated March 1992 and revised August 1992.
May 27, 1994: This permit has been modified to allow the construction
of settling ponds as per the plans received by the Land Quality
Section on April 5, 1994.
April 24, 1995: This permit has been modified to change the corporate
name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
October 17 1997: This permit has been modified to increase the
affected acreage at the site to 176.5 acres as indicated on the mine
maps and associated sediment and erosion control plans dated August
1997. In addition, the modification allows the installation of the
primary crusher station inside the existing pit (including the
development of shear walls required for the crusher relocation),
expansion of the pit area, development of a new entrance road and
interior access roads, construction of new visual barrier berms, a new
plant and process area; and new office/scale house, and the
installation of related erosion and sedimentation control measures as
specified by the above referenced plans.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until
November 25, 2002.

•
Page 4 of 14
Conditions
This Permit shall
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et
limitations:
be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
. seq., and to the following conditions -and
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and_Quarry Dewaterinc7
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in
accordance with the permitting requirements and rules
promulgated by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission.
B: Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site
shall be in accordance with any applicable permit
requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C.
Environmental Management Commission. It shall be the
permittee's responsibility to contact the Stormwater
Section, Division of water Quality, to secure any necessary
stormwater permits or other approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control.
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to the
requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air
Quality.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means that
may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from
leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of
the U. S., or wetlands shall be in accordance with the
requirements and regulations promulgated and enforced by the
N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer (minimum 100 foot undisturbed) shall be
maintained between any affected land and any adjoining
waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that
waterway wetland from erosion of the affected land and to
preserve the integrity of the natural watercourse or
wetland.

Cl
. Page 5 of 14-
C. The buffer zones shown on the "Site Plan With Buffer Zone
Indication" dated August 1997 shall be maintained to protect
adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control -measures
and earthen berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
ZS Ariegate mec}:aiiicai barrioro Laic lud Liag, ati'iut ilvt 11111lted tV
diversions, earthen dikes, silt check dams, silt retarding
structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to
prevent sediment from.discharging onto adjacent surface
areas or into any lake, wetland or natural watercourse in
proximity to the affected land.
B. The construction of the overburden disposal area shall be
conducted as per the revised Grading Plan dated March 1990
and received by the Land Quality Section on June 20, 1990
with the following stipulations: (1) Diversion Ditch A,
from.Sta 0+00 to 1+90 shall be provided with a suitable
temporary liner (i.e., straw with netting and/or acceptable
alternative), (2) the minimum weir length for all sediment
traps shall be ten (10) feet, (3) all No. 5 washed stone
filters shall be provided on the upstream face of the
sediment traps gnly and not on the top of the backside of
said structures, (4) the spillway at the existing pond
shall be constructed with a 20 foot bottom width, (5) the
minimum thickness for Class A stone treatments shall be 9
inches, Class B - 22 inches, Class I - 18'inches and Class
II - 24 inches, and (6) the proposed slope drains shall be
considered permanent and provided with 12 foot long NCDOT
Class I rip rap aprons, 18 inches thick as a minimum. Any
changes in the permanent control of surface water runoff in
the overhirrden rii gpncal area shall be addressed by. a revised
sediment and erosion control plan and submitted to and
approved by the Land Quality Section prior to its onsite
implementation.
C. ' The Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1-and EC2, dated March
1992 and revised August 1992 shall be followed.
D. The Settling Ponds Erosion Control Plan received by the Land
Quality Section on April 5, 1994 shall be followed with the
following -addition: Silt fence shall be erected downstream
of SB-1 prior to the construction of SB-1 and SB-2. Said
silt fence shall be maintained until both settling ponds
have 'been completely constructed and stabilized-

5
6
7.
• 0 Page 6 of 14
E. The Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1-and EC2, dated August
1997 shall be followed with the following stipulation:
temporary or other suitable liners shall be installed in all
temporary and permanent diversion channels, as necessary, to
prevent erosion and offsite sedimentation.
F. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted
to the Department for approval prior to any land disturbing
activities not indicated on the revised erosion control plan
or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas
include, but are not limited to, expansion outside of the
approved pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of
overburden disposal areas.
Groundwater Protection
Groundwater monitoring wells shall be installed and monitored as
deemed appropriate by the Department.
Graded-Zlopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater
than the angle which can be retained by vegetative cover or
other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated
channels, the erosion of which may cause off -site damage
because..of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided
with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient to
restrain such -erosion.
B. overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of any pit
expansion conducted after November 25, 1992 shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall
be stabilized within 60 dayq of completion. Furthermore, a
minimum twenty-five (25) foot wide.horizontal safety bench
shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of
the overburden slope.
surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of
pools of water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul.
Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall
be constructed or in when required to prevent such
conditions.

Page 7 of 14
8. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
findings of anv seismic studies conducted at this facility. The
operator shall make every reasonable effort to incorporate the
studies` recommendations into the production blasting program.
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from
thrown rock or vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise
provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of any
component of ground motion shall not exceed 1 inch per
second at the immediate location of any building outside of
the permitted area regularly occupied by human beings such
as dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building outside of the
permitted area. The operator shall monitor each blast with
a seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear
(DBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building outside of the permitted area such as any
dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building. If vibration/airblast
limits are exceeded, the operator shall immediately report
the event with causes and corrective actions..to„_the ..,
Department. Use of explosives at the blast site that
produced the excessive reading shall cease until corrective
actions approved by the Department have been taken.
However, blasting may occur in other approved areas within
the permitted boundary. Authorization to blast at the blast
site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of
Li- L -1 L ' -1- -1 L �! ' L LL _ ' L _ _ r
L.11e 111g11 a1riJlaS'L. rerLU111c�-. 11 L11C C JL1CUi[IStc-inC:es .]uStify
verbal approval. Failure to report will constitute a permit
violation.
CThe operator shall take all reasonable precauti_onG to insure
that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is
temporarily or permanently guarded by the operator. Should
flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded area, or the
level in Item A. above is exceeded, the operator shall
report the incident to the Department immediately and
further use of explosive at the site shall be -immediately
suspended until the following actions have.been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.

• Page 8 of 14
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation shall
be provided to the Department within 10 days of the
incident. Said report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause Is' of tho i —Ji dent l ' 4-U 4--;..I-.-2 'f �
�+/ ...♦xa. .r.ucii - ¢.6 viiy WIth tec ianical anu
management actions that will be taken to prevent
further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the Department
before blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take
corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of this
permit.
D� The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes and
delay of intervals; depth and size of holes; type and total
nnifnacz of explosives • maximum nniinris. nor rie.l mtir ;.r,+ or,r-1
r.... --•-«. L.-... ..� .., Vv.... e-- .....--Z i11c vof;
amount of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location;
distance from blast to closest off -site occupied structure;
and weather conditions at the time of the blast. Records
shall be maintained at the permittee`s mine office and
copies shall be provided to the Department upon request.
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give
24 hour advance notice to the Land Quality Section prior to
L i 1 _ _ ! _ _ L - - _ '- - '-
any blase- uu4-jin a period for wnic Ih notice is requested.
F. closer communications between the driller and explosives
personnel shall be conducted. Voids and fracturing are
Quite discernible during the drilling process anH t-hia
information must be required by and shared with the
explosives personnel.
G. weather related issues (such as temperature inversions)
shall be acrutinized prior to loading an upper level shot
based upon the location and bench level of the shot.
Blasting during temperature inversions should be avoided
whenever possible.-- ., .
H. A qualified blasting consultant shall closely monitor the
entire drilling and blasting program at this site for a
period of 30 days from November 15, 1996. This should
determine if any other changes in the drilling and blasting
programs are needed to prevent excessive air overpressure'
readings from occurring in the future.

40 Page 9 of 14
9. Haigh Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end
or fencing shall be maintained At All timaa arniinri t-hc nor;r.,c�cr
of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. in
addition, .a minimum 25 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be
provided at the junction between the top of rock and the toe of
any overburden cut slope.
10.- Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and
pubii�. tharoughfur4F to 7crccil thG Vt,G1c1L1V11 L1.lJlll t e
public. Additional screening methods, such as constructing
earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed appropriate by
the Department.
B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1 and EC2, dated August 1997.
In addition to grasses, loblolly and/or Virginia pines or'
other acceptable species shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and noise
buffering.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire
to delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the mining,
reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan contained in the
approved application for a mining permit and any approved
revisions to it. Approval to implement such changes must be
obtained from the Department -prior to on -site implementation of
the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is
-generated outside of the mining permit area shall be allowed
W-I t-h i n the 1-)n11nriari ey of f-IIo mi nirlrr nurmi area ��nl o��
authorization to conduct said disposal has first been
obtained from both the Division of Waste Management and the
Land Quality Section, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. The method of disposal shall be consistent with
the approved reclamation plan.

• Page 10 of 14
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining
Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly associated with
the mining activity may be disposed of in a designated
refuse area- All nther waste nrndttr_ts mast hP Al annppei of
in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their
storage containers or any other material that may be
considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the
permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land
Resources considers the following materials to be "mining
refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed under G.S.
74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971) :
1) on -site generated land clearing debris
2) conveyor belts
3).. wire cables
4) v-belts
5) steel reinforced air hoses
6) drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the
mining permit boundary, the following information must be
provided to and approved by the Division of Land Resources
prior to commencement of such disposal:
1. the -approximate boundaries and size of the.refuse
disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be
provided over the refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least
4 feet above the seasonally high water table; and
vprifiratinn that a nermanent vegetative croundcover
will be established.
E. Contaminated soil remediation (i.e., stockpiling of only
petroleum contaminated soil) shall be allowed at the site as
indicated on the site map submitted to the Land Quality
Section with the additional information dated September 5,
1991. In addition,...,.it shall be conducted in accordance with
the rules and requirements promulgated by the Environmental
Management Commission.

Page 11 of 14
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the
form of a $500,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the
operation as.indicated in the approved application. This
security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources. .

0 Page 12 of 14
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the -performance
of which is a condition on the continuing validity•of that'Mining
Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation
of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining
Permit:
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S.-74-53'
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and
other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to
minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent with the
future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must
be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which
is in accordance with accepted conservation practices and which
is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on
the mined area that are, likely'to become noxious, odious"or
foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established -by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be,_:
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan,
which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation
simultaneous with mining operations and in any event., provide
reclamation at the earliest practicable time after completion or
termination of mining on any segment of'the'permit area and shall
be completed within two years after completion or termination of
mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry excavation to
fill with water, provide a permanent barricade (fence) along the
top of any highwall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.

0 Page 13 of 14
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface
suitable for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or
waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical
or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to insure slope
stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and made
into acceptable lake areas.
C The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted.surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise
prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine
site. On -site disposal of waste shall be in accordance with
Operating Conditions Nos. 12.A. through E.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection
of noxious or foul water.
3. Reve etation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the
Revegetation Plan prepared by Mr. Paul C. Embler dated August 19,
1991 in the application for renewal dated April 4, 1992.

0 Page 14 of 14
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be -initiated as
soon as feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion
or termination of mining.
This permit, issued April 9, 1972, renewed April 9, 1982,
modified August 15, 1990 and November 22, 1991, renewed and
modified November 25, 1992, and modified May 27, 1994 and April
21, 1995, is hereby modified this 17th day of October, 1997
pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
Charles H. Gardner, Director
Di:riSinn of rand oe�.^.ur
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

OCT 151997 D
RV
MEMORANDUM
TO:
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
September 29, 1997
Judy Wehner, Asst. Mining Specialist
FROM: Tim Holland, Asst.Regional Engi
THROUGH: John Holley, Jr., Regional Engi
RE: North Raleigh Quarry 92-02
Wake Co.
I have reviewed the permit modification request for
the subject mine. The application appears complete
and the plan adequate. I recommend approval.

DAQ Comments - Air Quality
Project: Af• County:
reed 9 f.13
Assigned To: !'h Due: Completed:
REVIEW ISSUES:
ILL
Air Permit Required
Air Permit Existing (No. )
Notice of Violation Issued (Date(s) } ��
Enforcement Actions Taken (Date(s) }
Comments:
C C
Approved By: Date:
7
0

DWQ Comments - Groundwater Quality
8�/✓��/rl/%eX -' ci9Ro1,/�vf� /966-.��i�i�si -TAIG
Project : �. �` �`1.� County: kr1�, ..., __—
Assigned To :-REWcE V-Y4VR ,9,2!:VV Due: Completed: 2 Z i
Well Permit Required
Well Permit Existing (No. )
Co,"t.aMJ na4- 4 -- i]s+�l,l ern
VLNMJ{M�i{�. rr.L 4V{{V..{JI��JJ41. VJ{
Notice of Violation Issued (Date(s) i✓�A )
Enforcement Actions Taken (Date(s) 4m )
Comments:
pERm1r
Approved By: Date: -9 7
7,9K", .1 Jr

•
J
DWQ Comments - Water Quality.
PrnzPc�t � %V f`-'P�UCCGbf �di1/L%'n►s t•n„nty • �/,i�F[d�
Assigned To: Due: (° 17 Completed: —VU-A7
Watershed/Stream Name and Classification: fieuS6 Ayerz- C-NSW
l`srn.:-rw- ,N DOL w 2-0 '{yu.i) W CN L." D CRG&K , ... .
Comments:
ZB .D233
12ERMITS: 14c-4 OUZo`1 Is Lockrep *r 10501 CAP,r41- gw-Q ,
Ch,-.Amrjy -,Mi$ ,9 i-mC- LdeAT,OjJ YES
NPDES Permit Required —NO ADDae-Ps- "STeD I.-
NPDES Permit Existing (No. 1`J;r-r1OzOz,4 )
Nondischarge Permit Required w/A
Nnnr�i �nharnn Dormi t^,v9 ct4 rrt fhir. 1 .,/a
Notice of violation Issued (Date(s)
Enforcement Actions Taken ( Date (s)
Comments: MoO iP,eA7 rorJ 1Aao l TroP►AL ig u r 2fD IF EEGrr,Jr i765
mkeiL TA" o e- ND S ,r -Apg jtJCt,(kD&P
!- M&.PR-OUECZ, CTMIS Dp&5 Nor 69 Ti(G caSe�,
Wetlands Disturbed by Activity
401 Certification Required
Comments:
L sD Co rO
r
j • LGi .rG
JtAJ KNo(wr )
733 — 1796
NaTc : A&) Po-&Ro aA ZAT, o N iv Co QSTAucr Palm r T MAC{ ee P P-eO f;&
DvJY W- ANi ADDITIotJ dP Oa fwPJNSfwtJ oF: s;�IzM vi4 TI 6-2-
Dj�rtYNT,o fJ PONDS W H, CH 114h4 PC RG4 u <--A i" UoJ De17--
NGCl 0 20 Za �j Pc.c1t�� Go�T�CT p ��N 1� ?
y,r. 52-5
Pe

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Oct 14'97 10:54 No.002 P.01
FAX COVER
Falls Lake Office
0.Ste
Nurrter'of Pees inciudina cover she -Et
To:
P3-�cr,e
M
Fax phone
rr..
L l.,
=.yI I:I
[1 Urcert
Alm I111iZrIlifQ Ppq Cnrri�r,jw�;��
Habitat Conservation Program
11 42 1-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, NC 27522
From- •
PhoMe
Fax Fhcne
°1a-526-��36
i Q-SZO2Q-1
L Fcr your review Ll FapI-! A5rLF
l�,/.., '4 4z -0Z-
NOTE: -NEW US POSTAL MAILING ADDRESS: 1142 1-85 SERVICE P,0AD
CREEDM001, NC 27522

LAKE TEL:[phone]
Oct 14'97 10:55 No.003 P.01
INCWRC,NCP,FRLLS
® North Carolina Wikffife Resources Commission®
512 N. Salisbury Street, Rddgh, North Carolina 276044188, 919-733-3391 -- -
Chula R. Fullwood, Encutive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan B. Edwards, Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
QQ
FROM: Owen Anderson, Pi llr rant &n Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Mining Modification for Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc. North Raleigh
Quarry, Ncuse River Basin, Permit No. 92-02
Biologists on the Wildlife Resources Commission staff have reviewed the proposed
modifications and are familiar with habitat values of the project area. Our comments are
nrnyide in a'rnrdanre will; nrnyiei.^.aw of t.�:v 1:��a';aiai Aci of i971 Ias amaen- t! , i!dL j (V..?. /�F-
46 through 74-68 15 NCAE 5}.
The applicant proposes to expand the mining operation at the North Raleigh Quarry.
o to the maps provided, a 50-foot buffer will be maintained along Richland Creek and a
100-foo ndisturbed buffer will be maintained along the Neuse River.
Provided these minimum buffers remain undisturbed and native trees and shrubs are
maintained or allowed to become establish in these buffers, we concur with the mining
J%W"U%1Vi^n
"i..waa.,uvaa.
We appreciate the efforts to revegetate with species that will benefit wildlife. We
encourage the applicant to continue to select species that will enhance wildlife habitat. The use
of fescue should be avoided it possible because it provides very poor rood and cover.
The document states that a perennial seed mix of the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
would be used in some stabilization pre. ts, We encourage the use of this type or similar
Mixtures-, however, the applicant should be aware that this is no longer available through our
aonnry
L
We appreciate the opportunity to review this permit modification during the planning
stages. if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at [phone].
cc:- Allen R. King, P.E., Southwind Surveying and Engineering

OCT 13 '97 03:33PM
•
P.1/4
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
September 29, 1997
TO: Judy Wehner, Asset. Mining Specialist
FROM: Tim Holland, Aset.Regional Engi
THROUGH: John Holley, Jr., Regional Engi
RE: North Raleigh Quarry 92-02
Wake Co.
I have reviewed the permit modification request for
the subject mine. The application appears complete
and the plan adequate. I recommend approval.

OCT 13 '97 03:33PM
P.2/4
DWQ Comments - Water Quality.
Project: --9. ILAIA4�k� County: '
Assigned To: _,.- _—_ Due: j° ► 17 Completed: ��-7
4 _ 11
1104*49
Watershed/Stream Name and Classification: 9euSG _AJew
C9T4&^ iAl X;)IF 2.0 rtM -7) W"&.4oV D C"-
comments: Bu u aVr 1J t,r ^ P-WG R- r+ S ,ki-D $t
z8 .D2.3�
r1CCe 0Zv7.U11 15 Wc-4rC--D *r 1oS61 CAni;a►- k..te.
Ch55�tM1+�4 9 1i i�[G (.�'cl�i}cry Y-M NO
NPDEs Permit Required �mo AoDlrc*S, ,As;ep or PACO;416) ,
KPDES Permit Existing (No. N��i��oZ,,o4
Nondischarge Permit Required NN+
Nondischarge Permit Existing (No. } _ M/*
Notice of Violation issued (Date(s) ) AIA
Enforcement Actions Taken ( Date (s)
Comments:-Ma0iF14a;torJDDl gpt ej&u S-rriNG !2�f Bi� & c( 7P IF Af.ri%h7J65
�' o S" i r al�E1'1c�.itDp
O S Dn&S Alai EI
Wetlands Disturbed by Activity
401 Certification Required
Comments:
,Approved B;
CtAJ KNOOIJ
73-� -1 756
*'No-N : Af-i WNo"-ZATioN 73 C0n14-YR0cr P&m 1 < MAI Or, Kgktk,4�-O A&Nt
hO' ADDi i is N 4V OZ SPA Ns1w lei or- 5. tb XAO%1 �vJATfJZ-
j� Jam` T n r 1. ^; A. &%A I. , O L ! 1 1 � -Fr
SJM (Cl' 110i NW D 7 '1�v� �r.r+ t y.. -7. vr. .+�r
NGC� o 26 �d q Paft5e, cdwr-Acr UAvLzi Pd�-O133 - 5a03

OCT 13 '97 03:34PM
P.3/4
MINT. SITE, REVTRW_FORM
DWQ Comments - Groundwater Quality
Project: _ !c� r�; '�' County:
Assigned To:AWAF K4- LVr , ue : , `D -Completed: .12
well Permit Required
Well Permit Existing (No. )
Groundwater Contamination Problem
Notice of Violation Issued ( Date (s)
Enforcement Actions Taken (Date(s) )
Comments:
Approved By: Date:
r

OCT 13 '97 03134PM
P.4/4
DAQ Comments - Air Quality
Protect: N . I WLrUP fr •, ' county:
re-c-a gf33
Assigned To: - 4 Due:2ZoV,.*Completed: 2
Air Permit Required
Air permit Existing (No. }
Notice of Violation issued (Date(s) ) �.
Enforcement Actions Taken (Date(s) )
comments:
Approved By: Date

SENT BY: 9-16-97 : 9:12AM : SOUTHWIND SURVEYING- :# 1/ 2
. r S • •
AM��/'�
ARd�YiEC7LR8
DATEI
FROM
NUMBER OF PAGES INCJ-UDING COVERT 2
QE�RASILkw 1�
SOUTHWIND SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC.
2M GLEN RD. - GARNER, N.C. 27529
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

SENT BY:
IN
ADD
t =11 F oFRGAD
J!6 43""
sit—tN4•-775-0103
7T'J—OI4E (FAX)
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
9-16-97 : 9:13AM : SOUTHWIND SURVEYING
3�_ 1VC.
�� B
September 15, 1997
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
"J. Assistant State Mining Specialist
.Re: Benc1►1 U
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Permit No. 92-02
Dear Ms. Wehner
As requested by Mr Steve Edgerton, the following is a list of the affected acreage's for the above
referenced project.
Tailing Ponds
Stockpiles
Waste Piles
Process Area / Haul Road
Mininit_Ar_ea
Total:
5.9 Ac.
18.0 Ac.
13.0 Ac,
38.6 Ac.
101,0 Ac,
176.5 Ac.
We trust that this information is sufficient for your review and approval, However should you
have any fiuther questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CA12OLINA RPONE, 919-773-0183/FAXt 919-773-0148

r
►.V
i201 GLEN ROAD
GARNER, NC 27529
919-773-0103
219-773-D118 (FAX)
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Re: Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Permit No. 92-02
Dear Ms. Wehner
September 15, 1997
0
,n. ca
SEP bill1.71997
I �1�
As requested by Mr Steve Edgerton, the following is a list of the affected acreage's for the above
referenced project.
Tailing Ponds
5.9 Ac.
Stockpiles
18.0 Ac.
Waste Piles
13.0 Ac.
Pro Area /H 1 Road
Process .ea L1Ui VQLL
Ia.0 A
00 V Ac.
Mining Area
101 A Ac.
Total:
176.5 Ac.
We trust that this information is sufficient for your review and approval, However should you
have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE-. 919-773-0183/FAX: [phone]

.��.. ,.. .. .. . :-r..vn �..r�.,.rn,,.r.-.....,�....ss-:«f+^^k.ay.�+[1+-.1;.�-�+`t�.-.-:.a,Ax»,-d*....ti.....r.s...en--a..,.i,,.;. .. -,._: •.r. ,:�, .. w�,-r.��.-•.�,�-. �'r � .. - ..
DATE TO"'ASSISTANT !� DATE TO SAN
LOGGED IN
� MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTINGG
company � n & rroiect Name � IU?J 1 -0 " i 1(.4a'r
Permit No. County UALE Sate Received
J Reviewer CI
f _Yf�A-441
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and,log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information LJ Fee Needed
_,2KFee Received: Amount 6-00Uv
Please route to:
�LJ e11LC-(C-,)14 Field Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed /"lzm-c�-7
1 S3L-1
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for comments: (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
J Please note the following:
g
OU C,l &JA) L4tl�i -�
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

2153796
i
500.00
I
F
NCHMARK CAROLINA/GENERAL CRUSH iEC �:�aicJ
PFIIL�,_LL=wa . - 2153796
IE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND .00 CENTS
�E ORQER OF: Nr nruNR
0%--09-97 $500, 00
"Iq fKIWAAM -

0
An
vd V
Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates
September 9, 199
Ms. Judy Wehner
NC DEHNR - Div. of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Re: Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Dear Ms. Wehner:
On September 8, 1997, we sent a permit modification letter (see enclosed
copy), with supporting calculations and plans, regarding our Raleigh Quarry Permit
No. 92-02. We neglected to enclose a check to cover the processing fee. Please
find enclosed the check for $500.00 to cover this fee.
If you should have any questions, please advise.
JRHS/dr
Enclosures
Sincerely,
James R. H. Sprinkle
Operations Manager
P.O. Box 13983, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
Office: [phone] • Telefax: [phone]

re.Pis;
WILT
BGLENROADARKER, . 27321
Ili-7TS-BIIE (PAX)
`� wp -
S
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
f .L. Box 2 168 7
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
E
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Re: Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Dear Ms. Wehner
CanfemF.er 4 11907
Please find enclosed the required plans and supporting calculations for a permit modification for
the above referenced project.
The operations required in this modification includes the following:
Mining operations within the existing pit are to proceed in such a manner to develop all
working surfaces required for the installation of primary crusher station and associated equipment
inside the existing pit. This includes the development of pit access roads, working surfaces and
shear walls to the required horizontal and vertical plains.
Normal stripping operations are to continue with the placement and compaction of
materials in the new plant area. This operation will continue until this area is developed to
subgrade elevation.
Erection of the new plant proceeds with the construction / erection of equipment,
crushers, conveyors etc. as both "pit' & "plant" areas are developed to the required subgrade
conditions. Construction of new plant equipment consist of the placement of new machinery and
the installation of modified existing equipment.
As the entrance areas are developed to subgrade elevations, normal stripping operations
are to continue with material being used to create visual barrier berms. Once these areas are
ke—aiavub"t u� av '�-'yraue, w asw nu. ara..�7LQL;61&Zraa wiu+ "v',, aspllalL or Vol141e1e bUlI kes as well as
seeded and landscaped as shown on approved plans.
As the new plant operations come on line, the existing plant will be dismantled with
usable equipment being sent to other mining sites or stored and unusable equipment being
properly disposed.
Completion of plant area includes the placement of stone, asphalt, concrete, ect. to bring
plant and entrance area to finished grade. Construction of new scale house / office and scales will
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE: [phone]/FAX, 919-773-0148

i
i
then route traffic to new entrance area. The existing; entrance will the be properly signed for use by
the existina asphalt plant.
Normal stripping and mining operations will continue toward the west as in manner to
advance the existing pit towards the new mining limits line.
As slopes are stabilized development of detention ponds will commence. Normal dipping
and grading operations will develop the 4 cells required detention pond # 1. Normal dipping and
grading operations will develop existing detention pond #2. As soon as detention ponds and
adjacent areas are graded to required elevations and stabilized, stripping and grading operations
shall begin for the installation of channel "D" and new 72" CMP pipe with required inlet/outlet
protection.
Operations and procedures will be conducted in sequential order as listed or concurrent as
to meet the market demands.
We trust that this information is sufficient for your review and approval, However should you
have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton

N 0 i
�T!-IWIND
201 OUR ROAD
GARNER, NC 27321P September 8, 1997
!I!»773-0183
!1l-773-01" (FAY)
.S'
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Re- Renchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Dear Ms. Wehner
The following is a list of the affected acreage's for the above referenced project.
Stockpiles
5.6 Ac.
Visual Barrier Berm
1.7 Ac.
Processing Area/Haul Road
20.7 Ac.
Mine Excavation
28.9 Ac.
Other/Office Area
0.4 Ac.
Concerning the required fee's, please contact Mr. Steve Edgerton at 380-2615.
We trust that this information is sufficient for your review and approval, However should you
have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE: [phone]/FAX: [phone]

... ,. -� ... - r -- -.. .� .,..�,-.r .,,-o.....N;a,i,.. r.. ..+...,e,.tw'^.G'r,.,r^r-.� ... .:^-•�t-�...�v-r.-c ���'p, .. , - .. .,.,...3 .r^r .v - ,_ , .r,-�ti_• -..:j r � ... ..... �. -
DATE TO ASiSISTANT—(� DATE TOQSAN
LOGGED IN
(�
� M NING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Company _ 64"X'ynar.IrAd06A k Project Name 0' GiNY
_ t�
Permit No. a �a .County AV_ Date Received 9
Reviewer
Please makeV copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal Modification ❑ Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Additional Information �,�Fee Needed '50bvo
❑ Fee Received: Amount
Please route to:
-f ko Lit I(0 Ht Field Office
A�Wldlife Resources Commission
Archives and -History
' Other: I b
Date Routed
Date Routed — U — i
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments: 9 (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
Please note the following:
U l'
*SUSAN: return Checklist and Me to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

t-
s

State of North CaroA
Department of Environment,
Health and- Natural Resources
"A
Division of Land Resources j 0
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist September 9, 1997
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Owen Anderson
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FLVlll; .7LLCall D. L'l1WaLL15
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
Re: Minina Permit Modification Request for Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates -
North Raleigh Quarry - Permit -No. 92-02
Wake County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit
modification request for the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of
1. 1i15 operCL l.loll III CLY lllg u11L1t1.Ly 0iUYCL.7C CLLCI:L o11 WL1.U.LLLC a11C1 LIC.i11WclLt2.
fisheries (G. S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by -October 11, 1997 so that we
may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit -applications,
renewals and modifications, this office will carefully review all proposed
erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that they are sufficient to
restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your
agency can provide regarding effects on wildlife -and freshwater -fisheries
would be greatly appreciated. If your staff wishes to perform a site
inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting this
request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, p]!ease,send a copy of
your comments to the person noted in the application. RETURN ALL
APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type requests is
greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at [phone] if
you have any questions.
SBE
Attachments
CC: Mr. John Holley
Geological Survey Section Land Qually Section
[phone] [phone]
FAX: (919) 733-MM FAX: (919). 733-2876
P.O. Box 27867, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-M
An Equal Oppommity► Af&mwtn Acdon Emplcrrow 30% Rwydsd / 10% Post- a ff v PaW

State of North Carolirf
Department of Environment,
Health and- Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist September 8, 1997
Mr. Steve Edgerton ,
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
n n
V Box
C . V1i 1.7 70.J
Research Triangle Park,'NC 27709-3983
RE: Mining Permit No. 92-02
North Raleigh Quarry
Wake County
Dear Mr. Edgerton:
•
4��
Its AV-
[�EHNF1
We are in receipt of your mining permit application for the North
Raleigh Quarry in Wake County (Permit No. 92-02). A.modification
to your mining permit will require the submittal of a nonrefundable
$500.00 processing fee.
We regret that we cannot' complete processing the above materials
until we have received the necessary fee as authorized by the 1990
North Carolina General.Assembly in G.S. 143B-290 and as set forth
in the fee schedule adopted by the North Carolina Mining r''nmmissinn
15A NCAC 5B.0012. We will continue processing the paperwork but
cannot complete the modification request until the appropriate -fee
has been received by this office.
Please remit by check or money order $500.00 payable to the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.
Do NOT SEND CASH. Payments should be mailed to:
Attellt..Lull; i1a. Uudy Weliller
Assistant Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Full payment must be received by this office within 3-0 days or your
materials will be returned unprocessed.
Geological Survey Section
Land Quality Section
[phone]
[phone]
FAX: (919) 733-M
FAX:. (919)_ 733-2876
P.O. Box 27867, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atfkawd a Action Empfoyar W% Pagc ed / 10% Pow-Camffw Papa

0
Rj
Mr. Steve Edgerton
September 8, 1997
Page 2
A copy of the fee schedule as adopted by the North Carolina Mining
Commission is attached. The section pertaining to the materials
that you have submitted has been highlighted. See the fee schedule
for further explanation. if you have any additional questions,
please contact our office at [phone].-
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Susan B. Edwards
Land Quality Section
/SBE
Attachment

- `. N
0
. r-ej BUT
201 GLEN ROAD
GARNER. NC 27329
a to-na-at e3
9tti-773-011!! (FAX)
s
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 2761 1-7687
T
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Re: Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Dear Ms. Wehner
September 8, 1997
SEP 0 8 1997
Please find enclosed the required plans and supporting calculations for a permit modification for
the above referenced project.
The operations required in this modification includes the following:
Mining operations within the existing pit are to proceed in such a manner to develop all
Worktng aces rcyuired �i the insiaiiation of primary crusher station and associated equipment
1 }� �.
inside the existing pit. This includes the development of pit access roads, working surfaces and
shear walls to the'required horizontal and vertical plains.
Normal stripping operations are to continue with the placement and compaction of
materials in the new plant ar_a This operation will co;�<iriie uritii this area is developed to
subgrade elevation.
Erection of the new plant proceeds with the construction / erection of equipment,
crushers, conveyors etc. as both "pit" & "plant" areas are developed to the required subgrade
conditions. Construction of new plant equipment consist of the placement of new machinery and
the installation of modified existing equipment.
As the entrance areas are developed to subgrade elevations, normal stripping operations
are to continue with material being used to create visual barrier berms. Once these areas are
brought up to grade, the site will be stabilized with stone, asphalt or concrete s rPaces as well as
seeded and landscaped as shown on approved plans.
As the new plant operations come on line, the existing plant will be dismantled with
usable equipment being sent to other mining sites or stored and unusable equipment being
properly disposed.
Completion of plant area includes the placement of stone, asphalt, concrete, ect. to bring
plant and entrance area to finished grade. Construction of new scale house / office and scales will
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE, 919- 773- 0183/FAX , 919-773- 0148

then route traffic to new entrance area. The existing entrance will the be properly signed for use by
the existing asphalt plant.
Normal stripping and mining operations will continue toward the west as in manner to
advance the existing pit towards the new mining limits line.
As slopes are stabilized development of detention ponds will commence. Normal dipping
and grading operations will develop the 4 cells required detention pond # 1. Normal dipping and
aradinu oneratinnc will develon exigtinn detentinn nond 02 Ac .non ac detentinn nnndc and
adjacent areas are graded to required elevations and stabilized, stripping and grading operations
shall begin for the installation of channel "D" and new 72" CNIP pipe with required inlet/outlet
protection.
Operations and procedures will be conducted in sequential order as listed or concurrent as
to meet the market demands.
We trust that this information is sufficient for your review and approval, However should you
have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton

l
� �'
_�
r `� ,) ,
�.
�', ..
,�
•-

N •
•
1J � ��
207 GLEN ROAD
GARNER, NC 27529
919-773-018J
919-773-014E (FAX)
N.C.D.E.H.N.R.
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
E
Attn: Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Re: Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Raleigh Quarry
Dear Ms. Wehner
September 8, 1997
The following is a list of the affected acreage's for the above referenced project.
Stockpiles
5.6 Ac.
Visual Barrier Berm
1.7 Ac.
Processing Area/Haul Road
20.7 Ac.
Mine Excavation
28.9 Ac.
other/r rloi— Area
0 4 AC.
Concerning the required fee's, please contact Mr. Steve Edgerton at 380-2615.
We trust that this information is sufficient for vour review and approval, However should you
have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me at this office.
Sincerely,
J&*,� / /�
Allen R. King, PE
cc: S. Edgerton
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE: [phone]/FAX: [phone]

N • •
�T��
A90MMMM
E201 GLEN ROD
D
DGARNE 5N[C 27 29
D,D-»>-a„a (FAX, SEp 8 1997
sy
S -
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
CALCULATIONS FOR:
BENCHMARK
CAROLINA AGGREGATES, INC.
NORTH RALEIGH QUARRY
WAKE COUNTY
PERMIT MODIFICATION
ARv
�O S1p% ••
4 Y ;•
P�-
4 02 p$A
• � 4
9�kFNGIN�:.�'
q�f�-g1
AUGUST 1997
201 GLEN ROAD GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA PHONE: [phone]/FAX. [phone]

• 0
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.
CALCULATIONS FOR:
BENCHMARK
CAROLINA AGGREGATES, INC.
NORTH RALEIGH QUARRY
AUGUST 1997
TABLE OF CONTEXT
ITEM:
PAGE:
I. INDEX 1
2. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN 1
3. DETENTION POND DESIGN 5
4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP AND ROCK DAM DESIGN 7
5. CHANNEL. DESIGN 8
6. TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL 20

1=

1.
00 46 (A
N
, �. I
ul . I

22-141
SO'SHEETS'
22-142
100 SHEETS
22.344
200 SHEETS

7

i
i '"�7 � .. s' � %Z � Z0� Y
610
S, 14 A -047 1'
vle, QQ .0c rot "Os I
Vo .. .....
SL r4rr2j
JA
ri

r /
2bbL � i
.,E
V5

��� s . � �?'Z'2 ��� � .mod• , � C
FC
4.11
wvj
i�
r2nt��tI' 22�-7.2'l ky),2.1
2,� '�►�y fie,

--
T��24.144 -1005REET5-
-
. v
vit
_s- Z

Oki
I t
,I . i � � � I•. .�tltt k � � i
�L. fF 1.1' i
+
7-
ml
T1
ti VlNN
JAO
1jEl,,,!
k Ill—
AnC
— A
to

�50
l i. .,
i
,o �• V
i••
L
'.� ��
IT
I
I
224-.
10
227-Z?'�- -�
A
OV ,
i
�77. S
b n*7
1 Z� od -10?59
�VOV
1 1 7 p
0 2.1�2 k+ 22 .�-.Z?•�.�
7
.. 7. 3 !u Iv, cf C. (� 0-
.yp
..I ire• •_�` ,,;:
� ', � ��
i ..
222,2 -UM X - 705*1----------------
-7051
- -705 1
I
77
0
s 3 `' � t1�15 I i• � t -
I I

i
,
,: . 1
� , i ,I'.. �
y it
I ;j ,I. •
AI,�� I
'
i
i
�.. `r'..F �!.
i �, ��.
,,.
• ;ii•'1 gill
f
•
i
�� i �
� j,i s1
r r
�I ��� •I��j�
•I j.
a i•. "i�k•'ii'�I
.
i
� i
•ji
� :
' I it E' ;' i'
j
I
kl �1,E I
41
COW
j s s o
E
X
2 C/LZ
6 H��,il
L.�-L Z I- X
-Z,v�/ , Z' r�fL
V
?�,� I
i
Z22-522 x
L!'MZi
'.Z22
LI
t z
I E
l
l�l
;�

�� � t i •�, j� l I.
V.• 1 � I ' II� � .I 1 � � � ��jN! I
x#A
• I �� '�1. 1�{� 1 �d�"I
Via
.40
• i ,i � 1 �I ;�I i.
� s F �j• '! •IMF. II
,� j :F y , i. I I �•
- i I I /�y � � l;.F E 1 • { � iS • .`J1�I iI'I I,il 4
!
A A
IOY
- �i' •, a .�. ii 4 � �� }}��, '��1
I *11V
88
r%� r y y t N, �f N•
. � i .. 7. •,/. �.' .:F •' .�,— - � pry.
7 1 AAA1�.. t
! •i 1 I 1
0 ' � I op 'k-A
• � � s II�II ,• � .i

--- - - - - - -- -_ - - _ 22-141 50_SHEETS - -
�0 22.142 100 SHEETS
22.144 200 SHEETS
b-aoNAr;C DI4T. V oc v✓�/e
047 k.-
_TSwT-3:t
?�s4
6.4ZAe..
G<=5- 9a
O• M'14C.
o, /_
i98.6(fr
2734
350'
_.7Z'_
715--
- -a
5.5vHc,
q.OS
ro o 7 Z-
l8':
-TbT
I , 99- /k-
1,4.9
z/ �Bq
�J'
3.- •
z1• o'
93�
Z�709C
_
Sr=S
3,5 Ff
2-.Z
3,97!
!o'
zso'
57j/
4oSc�F

I
Cy
-a ro V-1

;7,
-22-141 50 SHEETS
12 143 100 SHEETS
12'1" 200 SHEETS

,Pow ►.., " 10
Ll
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 25, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
17.7
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0118
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0440
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
4.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 1.01
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.92
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.593
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.13
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 6.05
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................. 8.03
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
de_-

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 25, 2097
PROGRAM INPHT nATA
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
17.7
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.1111
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0730
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet). ............................
5.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.65
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 4.36
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.050
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.30
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.94
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 4.06
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 7.58
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
MAX

I . 4:;tiTLjeT e,4Ar-j1,jNWSIG - e, I Z
aL
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 24, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Flow Rate (cubic feet
- - - - - - - - - - -
per second)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.......................
- - - - - - - - - -
15.7
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0278
Manning's Roughness
Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0440
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
4.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
NormalDepth (feet) ..................................... 0.75
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.82
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.879
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.23
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.97
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 4.11
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 6.99
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
"A"
ZCo, cz18 = �.� S �• a S
C,jF �r
.x 4' �-rT�M w ► �T�+

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL, ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 24, 2097
nnnrnA&& ruynrTm "AmA A.
F11VV1XCWA L"rU& LAlf7.
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) .......................
15.7
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.1231
Manning's Roughness
Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0840
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom width
(feet) .............................
5.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.63
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.95
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.959
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.24
EnergyHead (feet) ...................................... 0.88
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet)............... 3.97
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 7.54
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
(713) 895--8322. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
.. A�Y7.' el. eS
Tv'V

0)0 'J_rLf r ,emu, ve -
A; •
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 24, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
15.7
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per foot) ....................
0.0308
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n--value)...............
0.0440
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side (horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side (horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
5.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.65
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.83
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.919
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.23
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.88
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 4.10
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 7.60
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
G ",s ep 1i 041, �?}r Con
'ram 1�4;16 _
O

otA-rLaK t�-, 96, - e,- 115
vs *4 -ro A1Q0\jE4..,
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 24, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
19.4
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0538
Manning`s Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0630
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope --
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
5.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.77
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.87
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.865
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.23
EnergyHead (feet) ...................................... 1.00
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 5.01
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 8.07
,TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
e "e u 0
Iwhx rJ&- � 1. a > v,7'7
538 �

�•l -oJT -ram 1��, ��
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
July 24, 2097
PROGRAM TNp1_1T_ nATA
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second)
.......................
7.5
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0288
Manning-s Roughness Coefficient
(n--value)...............
0.0440
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope --
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
4.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.49
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.08
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.849
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.15
EnergyHead (feet) ...................................... 0.64
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 2.43
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 5.96
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
(713) 895Y-8322. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

WHOM
CIZ
V,= 1p
Vlore a -
Idol&
�• �'� 4r4 V21dg,-JoU IrmNNCI
�� O

4
S1

BENCHMARK
CAROLINA AGGREGATES
NORTH RALEIGH QUARRY
CHANNEL DESIGN 72" OUT
05 = 258.6 CFS
025 = 318.2 CFS
: n = 0.033
DEPTH 1.491n A P R
FT. SF FT FT
S^0.5 Q V
FT CFS FPS
2
45.15
32
22.65
1.41
0.063
115.19
3.60
3
45.15
57
28.97
1.97
0.063
256.14
4.49
3.1
45.15
61.03
41.29
1.48
0.063
226.45
3.71
3.45
45.15
75.61
42.39
1.78
0.063
318.14
4.21
NOTE:
Q=1.49/n *A
" R^0.67 '
S"0.5
WHERE:
V= 1.49/n "
R"0.67 ' S"0.5
Q=CFS
V=FPS
N=0.033 (GRASS)
A=fi F
R= A/P
S=FT/FT
X3
S W9700031
SEP. 1, 1997

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
September 2, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) ....................... 102.2
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0090
Manning's Roughness
Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
3.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
3.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
12.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 1.40
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 4.51
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.755
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.32
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 1.71
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 22.65
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 20.39
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
t �

O22-141 _.50 SHEETS -
22-142 100 SHEETS I
22-144 200 SHEETS
- , - .
i- • — — - — -
•- _e.
1 �//�-.T..,1{f-�. -/�/�//��/fjA'. yr.�,-rrsi ^e/�ra�/_ _ __
_zs.- - �s—� - z��. -._ �—_..___
- _• _—_
NR
4c-.
0,4
: S1q
STR:.at60 - 50
a-8;�;
".
_
4
S �
z�
o, s/
/l,�.
0,41g,9
e
9/ Rc
orq
g9
5 %
(6,
4nom---1+ o
�.O Z
04,41C-Of90
J.D/
CA)- 1+40
/Z, o
1+40 -Z430
9. o/
1-5

-VpG - � s l
..-'�•�se� . TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANAOSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1.5
Channel
..+ivr.c
Bottom Sllope
I �. e4L-.
hicc�. per
r...ot 1)
iVvl.J .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
_
U.UUtS�
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n--value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .....................____.,__
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.65
--W--Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 1.80 �--
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.557
.Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.05
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.70
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.83
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.58
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flory hart is available.

lob(,- 1
045° - -1 too
Gankss
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
0 22
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1.5
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0200
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.55
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.50
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 04843
Velocity Head (feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.10
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.64
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.60
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.19
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
zo Y'P5 ��.5 BP40
S!

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA -
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1.5
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0600
Manning�s Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.45
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.78
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.412
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.22
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.67
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).......'......, 0.40
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 1.78
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

7fsoi�
6�RAss.
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA!
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) .......................
1.5
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0200
Manning`s Roughness
Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE,
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.55
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.50
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.843
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.10
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.64
Cross -Sectional. Area of Flow (square feet).............. 0.60
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.19
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
\/-2,0fsZ,-1.e_FN 0rL�

D-ra�
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA*
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1.6
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ................__.=
0.0050
Manning`s Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope --
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.73
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 1.51
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.441
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.04
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.76
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) ........:..... 1.06
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.91
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

VIA
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1-.6
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per foot) ....................
0.0400
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side (horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side (horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.49
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.30
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.171
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.17
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.66
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.49
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 1.97
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, ##107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
V.:, 3 ,rso r-p5 z .4,&5 r��

Ge,4
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
1.6
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0200
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.56
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.54
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.846
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.10
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.66
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 0.63
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................. 2.24
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
V: � ew FP4 -1, J f� Ciro d

0 0 f t5
Via'.l`�J
G- Pass
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
0.5
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0100
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VAT.TTR
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.41
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 1.47
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.569
Velocity head(feet) .................................... 0.03
Energy Head(feet)...................................... 0.45
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 0.34.
Top Width of Flow(feet) ................................ 1.65;
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
a
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
0.6
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0500
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ...................................... 0.33
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.81
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.226
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.12
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.45
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 0.21
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 1.,31
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

7L'G��
000 -/y-30
6 2A eJ5
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) ....................... 0.6
Channel Bottom Slope (feet per foot) .................... 0.0200
Manning's Roughness Coefficient (n-value)............... 0.0330
Channel Side Slope - Left Side (horizontal/vertical).... 2.00
Channel Side Slope - Right Side (horizontal/vertical)... 2.00
Channel Bottom Width (feet) ............................. 0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALi1E
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.39
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 1.99
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical)............,....... 0.797
Velocity Read (feet) .................................... 0.06
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.45.
Cross --Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.30
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 1.55
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

ptcx�--- Q+7v
Gr�a�s
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
4.3
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0850
Manning-s
Roughness Coefficient
(n--value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.62
Flow Velocity (feet per second)........ 6...............6 5.60
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.772
Velocity Head (feet)................6.......6........... 0.49
Energy Head (feet) ....................... 6.............. 1.11
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) ........:..... 0.77-
Top Width of Flow (feet).... 6........................... 2.48
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
frs 1, 5 FPS
y 1�) -S �-- 6- z' � x '6 0- K , 08
'f,G,45� " " (2,P -n'kn

b tdo --` d t'70 • �j'f�
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
4.3
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per foot) ....................
0.0850
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0630
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side (horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side (horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
1.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.58
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.42
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.981
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.18
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.76
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 1.26
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 3.32
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
3 , "7

0 0
-1"�C"- 5 � 7
,a % 3+6s
(117
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 27, 2097
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
4.3
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per foot) ....................
0.0050
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side (horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side (horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet)......... 4...................
1.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.84
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 1.93
Froude Number (Flow is Sub-Critical)....................0.474
Velocity Head (feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.06
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.89
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 2.23
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 4.34
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
6.4
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0100
Manning's
Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 1.08
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.77
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.665
Velocity Head (feet)... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.12
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 1.19
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) ........:..... 2.32
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 4.30
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
V = ,? �� fP5 - -1. 6 FP5 a

-rb e.-
a+0o - o �- 4 c� •
•
5s
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) .......................
5.0
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot). ...................
0.0100
Manning`s Roughness
Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.98
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.60
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.653
Velocity Head (feet)........ ............................. 0.10
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 1.09
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).............. 1.93
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 3.93
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.

7 r
0t9D - ��40 •
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
5.0
Channel
Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.1200
Manning`s
Roughness Coefficient
(n--value).............:.
0.0330
Channel
Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel
Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel
Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.62
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 6.62
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 2.103
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.68
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 1.30
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.76
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.46
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, ##107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
,f e-A56 I:L,, P,,p- iZAP

�t90 -1 t-10
Goss , P )eAP
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA;
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet per second) ....................... 5.0
Channel Bottom Slope (feet per foot) .................... 0.1200
Manning's Roughness Coefficient (n-value)............... 0.0840
Channel Side Slope - Left Side (horizontal/vertical).... 2.00
Channel Side Slope - Right Side (horizontal/vertical)... 2.00
Channel Bottom Width (feet) ............................. 1.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.66
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 3.26
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.885
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.17
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 0.83
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 1.54
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 3.65
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
�✓I,q x D S� x, iz =, 67 7, 66. a K

z+ 30
�2�ss
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL! DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
5.0
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ...... .........:.:::
n . V J V V noon
v
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Left Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00'
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
1.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 0.45
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 5.85
Froude Number (Flow is Super -Critical) .................. 1.862
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.53
Energy Had (feet) ................ 6..................... 0.98
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet) .............. 0.86
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 2.81
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c).1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107, Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
V-:- Ls'. 8s �Ps``�• FPS

yak"
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
NORMAL DEPTH COMPUTATION
August 28, 2097
PROGRAM INPUT DATA:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Flow Rate (cubic feet
per second) .......................
6.7
Channel Bottom Slope
(feet per
foot) ....................
0.0050
Manning's Roughness Coefficient
(n-value)...............
0.0330
Channel Side Slope -
Deft Side
(horizontal/vertical)....
2.00
Channel Side Slope -
Right Side
(horizontal/vertical)...
2.00
Channel Bottom Width
(feet) .............................
0.0
PROGRAM RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION VALUE
Normal Depth (feet) ..................................... 1.25
Flow Velocity (feet per second) ......................... 2.16-
Froude Number (Flow is Sub -Critical) .................... 0.481
Velocity Head (feet) .................................... 0.07
Energy Head (feet) ...................................... 1.32
Cross -Sectional Area of Flow (square feet).......:...... 3.12
Top Width of Flow (feet) ................................ 5.00
TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, Version 1.1 (c) 1986
Dodson & Associates, Inc., 7015 W. Tidwell, #107► Houston, TX 77092
[phone]. A manual with equations & flow chart is available.
,1� FPS

At(
I `.1
Irj
J 6
O
r
in 4
L
V
C
a 2
N �
0.8
° 0.6
0.4
0.2
01
-
Greensboro
•
�1
�wAlrrr�ww�Mrrrr�w���wMwlr��r.�.�'.���r
wwr.r
mmmin
INN
n
5 10 20 40 60 2 3 4 6 8 12 18 24
iviinutes Hours
Duration
Figure 8.03d Rainfall intensity duration curves —Greensboro.
2
0
15
10
6
o
4
y
N
lJ
2
CD
l
C
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
01
��w�■w�w!■w■wwwwt■w■t1�■wa�■�ra11t��
t�■�w�tw•
I�
�rrr�Arrrr���rw�wwMrwwrw�w■
���t�rww■
ti
fa,ww�wtt■.tt■.iw�i���
��
ww�rrw
I
11
In
.`!1111
�w���wr�
wrwr�r
w�nMwwww
ra
raaw�r��r��•.�
��\
�.
•�rrrw
�,
ra■■�w�■■�■fi■f:���■�I■wrw.�r■�:r
��.
��
■�■�■r
L
5 10 20 40 60 2 3 4 6 8 12 18 24
Minutes Hours
_.. Duration
Figure 8.03e Rainfall intensity duration curves —Raleigh.
.f
8.03.6

t �ZAT _ Or. NORTH CA
RO A
sualEcr P1 11II1rf
DEPARYMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �J
t` _. C:our�ri
bIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1' '' - �q --
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED 81f ..fir"''I_r DATE',.���f-/.:1_ STATIOnI______ �__..�...
•j P, o. BOX 25201 `-
s+/..I I'lGI.4 NORTH CAROLINA .,701 CHECKED B�f __ nHr4' _..... — STR NO__ _-_ CHCCi� _ t)r
Lit 1C..
/ ow
- , r �.., y i •'i.4 y• wr► 4 `e •'•�'_.•�I Ri•:': � 'l.. .. .1. .VL•:
16
r'Y•,..' i �•'4!i•:�s'.y-':is.. .. ff .i

AUG-25-97 SUN 2:44 PM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P. 1
BENCHMMK CARa.&INA AGGREGATES
"so �
Caft
M w"Sa
Facsimile Dwumbsion
PAGE 1 OF
DATA
e
OUR FAX N(lMM IS: G%19 -- 5 5 q
BENCHMARK CAROLINA AWREGATES
10501 CAP1TAt BLVD.
WAKE FOREST, NC 27581
tjoltTN 'RAt+;gti �ugrr
jr rou Tao 1Vorxwwm Au A"nwAL mosun-n u,
111"R CALL VS An q 19 - 5'5' b - 4 o I
L661 9 Z 90V
me 110ma bn tonwiled In thisfbte[wade Menge it toMJtd*dW Lefomm&4 Intended erdj fie the aie of the
IndNAW er enWee namodabort. Ythe rtader elAh nfet ut yor ary hn vby mood
that any dinem[natloR, 400WOn or eepylne of thk lotllAlpllWolf u SO* prow6d. q'you have referred this
tomm"re0*6 d error, please Ineneedk*o note ae 0 iduhone w d f t m the eu wad Memp to as at as abnre
address rla As V. $. Aorta! Seater. IUAA eoa.

AUG-25-97 SUNr 2:45GPM BENCHMARK FAX N0, 919 554 1127 P, 2
VIBM,WTIECH
' The Vibration Monitoring Experts
August 15, 1997
Mr. Bill Maccini
BENCHMARK CAROLINA AGGREGATES
10501 Capital Boulevard
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
t .f Re: Analyses: Air Blast Above 128 dbL
July 23, 1997
North Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Maccini:
2175-B Highpoint Road, Snellville, GA 30278
404-972-8775 FAX [phone]
This is our evaluation on the air blast results from the North Raleigh Quarry on July 23, 1997.
We have evaluated the blast design and seismic records in order to determine possible causes for
the one (1) dbL excess on this blast. (Seismic record attached).
Given below are several possible causes that may explain the unusual results from the July 23,
1997, blast. Any one of the items may have contributed. They are listed by probability of
cause.
1 An eighteen foot (18') front line burden may be too excessive and prevent face
departure. This appears to be substantiated by the impulse generated at approximately
LG —to al... 1.1....4 n ....owns PD—^.A n4fnntk A%
VJ MS r11LL11G UlaaL aet41j%,nCe- 1,a�c.vvau auavaiw-a).
2. The movement of the odd hole (25 ms) may have contributed to quick relief.
3. The use of stone as stemming as opposed to cuttings.

11
AUG-25-97 SUN 2:47 PM BENCHMARK FAX N0, 919 554 1127 P, 3
0
-Page 2-
4. All muck piles and toes should be minimized.
S. Regular video speed recording of blast sequence will, in most all cases, illustrate
impulsive of irregular hole/timing detonation.
Should you have questions, please call.
Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
VIBRA-TECH ENGINEERS, INC.
Charles W. Trettel, A.I.P.G.
Vice President
CWT/nc
Attachment

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ATI.IWA •
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr- Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ■ ',,*Am ■
Charles H, Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
July 29, 1997
RECEIVED
Mr. Bill Maccini
Plant superintendent ,JUL 2 8 , 97
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
10501 Capital Boulevard DAY LAND RES.
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
TT - TT-1 L. T ' L.l Inci dent- L
Kr,: n-L911 h1.LrbJ.L l- 1111:.L11Ci1L. iJi July 43, 1`J`>'
Raleigh Quarry
Mining Permit No. 92-02
Wake County
Dear Mr. Maccini:
This letter is in response to your July 24, 1997 letter and
its enclosed documents. Your investigation' report contained
information regarding the high air blast recording associated with --
the blast conducted at the quarry on July 23, 1997. An
overpressure measurement of 129 dBl was measured by your company's
seismograph at approximately 1600 feet from the blast.
This office has completed its review of your investigation
report. It appears that the excessive airblast reading for this
shot was related to cracks in the face of the shot. Venting of
explosive gases caused by borehole #25 opening a fracture in the
face of the shot likely generated the high airblast reading.
It appears that your blasting company took all the necessary
precautions to address the backbreak problem along the face of the
shot. The thorough analysis of the face and drill --logs along with
the design and loading of the shot should have reduced the
potential for high airblast. Unfortunately, a seam joint opened
during the blast, which could not be detected or prevented during
the design of the shot.
As all necessary precautions were taken and this backbreak
area has now been eliminated, no additional measures are
recommended at this time. However, please incorporate the same
precautions used during this blast on all future shots at this
site. If future airblast readings continue to exceed 128 dBl at
this site, modifications to the blasting conditions currently
outlined in Mining Permit No. 92--02 may be made by the Department.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
1 appreciate your company's prompt investigation and reporting
of this matter to the Department. if you should have any further
questions on the above, please contact Mr. Tracy Davis, P.E., State
Mining Specialist, at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E. (w/copy of investigation report)

AN15TA
;A,
�MJA -��
IDEHNR
NORTH CAROLINA
7-117Pd 7?T1 NI W nV uAvviun�r a►rr
Im."WA f JLA% ill;,�/ • i Vi 'IL t ► iilVL 7 ffEL ► i,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687
RALErWj, NORTH CAROLINA 27611
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TO.
PHONEa f r
f
FAX: [phone]
FEMME MESSAGE
FAX NO.: oC
FROM:
DATE: �-- - TT : �O ✓r? , -
NUMBER OF PAGES BEING SENT (INCLUDING THUS PAGE):
COMMENTS: -

LAND OUAL17Y SRC TION RULSTIK, A.)PLI ySIS KRm•;¢iiRRT
(* = denotes fields where input data is needed)
Permit No.*: 92-02
permittee*: benchmark carolina aggregates
Mine Name*: north raleigh
Blast RP,-.rt. No t• 27 Date of Blasts• VA7/23/97 T, of L'astt: nn,nn au
• 0.G1.'. U7. V7 AM
Peak Particle Velocity Check:
D = Distance to closest offsite occupied structure (ft) : D* = 1600.0
w = Maximum pounds of explosives per delay (pounds) : Kt = 437.0
SD = Scaled Distance: SD = D/N'0.5 SD = 76.53838
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second) : V = 160 (SD) `-1.6
(*max. limit in mining permit is: V = 1.0 ips)
Based on known distances from the blast to the seismograph and any additional location,
the expected vibration level can be estimated at the second location as follows:
V = Particle velocity measured by the seismograph (ips) : V* : 0.12
DS = Distance from blast to seismograph (ft) : DSt = 1600
d = Distance from blast to second location (ft) : d* = 1600
PPV = Theoretical peak particle velocity at the closest offsite occupied structure (ips) :
PPV = V(DS/C1.5
Airblast (Overpressure) Check:
P = Unconfined Airblast/Overpressure (psi) : P = 82 (D/W^0.33) "-1.2 P = 0.130167
To convert (psi) to (dBL): (P/2.9 x 10%9)log x 20 P = 153.0421
AB = Confined Airblast/Overpressure (dBL): AB : P WK) - 35 dBL (for quarry situation)
Ia__.. In rl
"max. limit i alining permit is: AB = l t" dBL)
@T. Davis 6/24/94
00 TO PAGE 2 FOR BRPL0SIVE COLUMN CM
V : 0.155
PPV = 0.12
AB = 118.04

Explosives Column Check:
(this is a very approximate method based upon numerous assumptions,
specific densities may vary greatly depending upon the type and manufacturer
of the explosive products used in the shot; must consider each explosive used;
refer to Dupont Handbook for actual SPD, otherwise use the following:)
Assumptions: If 'straight' emulsion is used, use SPD (specific density) = 1.20
(per Ireco) If a 'blend/Blurry, is used, use SPD (specific density) = 1.25
If 'straight' anfo is used, use SPD {specific density) = 0.85
➢akin hatw000n, ovnlncivac. Total nnnnds of 2h 1. Nit _ noon
j....u. r..�. �rvuuuu va —FIVO. E1 — .7 OV
Total pounds of Rxplos. 12 (use 10,1' here if only have one explos.) t = 1000
Ratio between explosives = 9.88
Average pounds of explosives used per hole (pounds) t = 437
Breakdown of average pounds of explosives per hole due to ratio:
explosive #1 = 392, 7692
Explosive 12 = 44.23077
SPD = Specific densities for each explosive: SPD for Rxplos. 11' = 0.85
SPD for Rxplos. 12 (use 10.1' here if only have one explosive)* = 1.25
HD = Role Diameter Used in Shot (inches): HD' = 5
LD = Loading Density (pounds per foot of column): LD = SPD(.34)(HD)"2
LD for Explos. #1 = 7.23
LD for Rxplos. #2 = 10.63
Explosive column height for each explosive (feet): Explos. #1 = 54.36252
Rxplos, 12 = 4.162896
Total explos. column height = 58.52542
Stemming height used in shot (feet) t = 9
Total height of explosive columns) and stemming in the hole = 67.52542
Total depth of hole denoted on the blasting report for the shot in question' = 61
Analysis Completed By: Date:
6T. Davis 6/24/94

JUL-24-97 THU 11:56 AM BENCHMARK
FAX NO. 919 554 1127
P. 1
. BENCHM"K CAROLINA A GGREGA TESY
Leo rw" comw
L me W"w
Facsimile T _m_nm*lim
PAAfi X Q,P
lum •7--d./ 9
env: Zk�acyis
FROM,
R+BhlARlGS. ..` Jv ,x . D mot/
oUR FAX NU1I Ex is q1I -- 5 5 2 7
oeumuierflyinflis PIRAI t* AGGR(GAiES
"Mov10501 CAPITAL BLVD.
WAKE FOREST, NC 27587
NaitT14 Rglarqll cQu�rr
to YOU DO )VOr VB ALL MATl3R U M4NSA0"Wv
PLZA H CAU Us An 919 - ss- & -- 4 c 10
�� E
JUL 2 41997
na ln&nnadon eon&tntd is dite lbeiLpDe ma—m r Gr d_ft4a aflm ►._W .r..wI�. r...a.Md Wt &L.
rrMNi lrol
indlrkhea or enW#j awedabort. Ifthe maderaf ak momte tr net the fidesdedpreoltnR yell are l nway Ltd
OW an: dlittminmiox, iffjfpffi idea of eepyiny of ihir ea+urmWoa h etifc* pr#AW rd. ffyaa Aare ►retired SW
communreotkil tM fn vr, pleat Lamedl�lt$I jv@O st 6y rriephaNr ouRd red+r� *d adSM metWo to at at oW above
addnu Na the US. Pohl Servfet. f�4au4 Y"

JUL-24-97 THU 11:57 AM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P, 2
July 24, 1997
Aggregates
To: Mr. Tracy Davis
State Mining Specialist, DEHNR
From: Bill Maccini
Re: Exceeding the North Carolina Airblast Limit
Benchmark Carolina
10501 Capital Blv,
Wake Forest NC, 27587
919-556-4011
919-554-1127 Fax
Tracy this letter is in response to our conversation about exceeding the airblast limit at the
Benchmark North Raleigh Quarry. I am sending a statement from Mason Bullock the operation
manager for Blastrite Services. Mason was here at the site aiding in the loading process. Also
present at the site was Scott Hartness who is a Mine Safety and Health Representative from the
NC Dept. of Labor. Also enclosed is a statement prepared by him, Along with those statements is
the shot report with the seismograph information on it. I am sending the disk with the seismic
information to Vibra- Tech and will forward a copy of their report to you when it is received.
Blastrite Service has just started servicing our company at this quarry. This was their second shot
at this site, They are having to deal with some badly cracked faces which were a result of a severe
back break from the previous explosive company. We feel that the problem area has been
eliminated and will do everything possible to keep this from happening in the future. We feel that
it is very important to comply with all regulations and safe guards which govern our industry.
More so we are concerned about being good neighbor and the safety of our neighbors.
I appreciate your help in this matter and if you have any questions please feel free to call me at
556-4011.
Sincerely
Bill Maccini
Plant Superitnndant

L
C
JUL-24-97 THU 11:58 AM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P. 3
07/24/1997 18:09 8048623056 BLASTRITE VIRGINIA PAGE U1
Vap.Wyck, SC'
SAPWWbµt4; 4A
Potombuty..Vk
SOCNO , W V
Y : w.�nic►uae�srax awv"'1 wat
Mr:
Bondi"
/�y�e y��_y'��" ttc3W4 s
l sseanCh T »pt a perk'; NC 27709-3"3
Re' , ArNist, E*6006 State Lift. atNor* Raleigh �
This. lsl 4:avr s' 00*e4 and loaded 'in, .0c rdonce .wkh #w:P tr "; ,p
p'e alR�ttetttod.. &'the z1ho�t was .being'designed,'we ttptlEe�f t'p::or k1 #tie a �:.',
pftarlty oflaM thisib en mmer. Also, #hRe obserVtn drilling •WFR . A,._vrQi.r
cuittiri `s; ettrsirgirt : ' . fvn the cracks' alone the face. i {
off
Owing.f%&'V.oper*f s aR front-line b"'holes'we IosdaQ'a :-t4:. *#1 tiUrd'
e ents,... reduced diameter roduats as ne6detl;; : aa,' (n4t: ant; Jre i �gulrem �rtiNxli�ig:. P � �'`
hal$s .tri Stien.ayere."sleeved to insure .noC a tti�dotai
i'':. r .•
. : cj c4ca':cr. eeerris: •'Rtie drirl lap was .cans+�teif error to: begtn�ind ..la�iating? o�iatinds a
411 o! �•bbra.-holes baded accordingly: r.
bel tine . st;'� came: from the.
Vlte lave: a1C': 24 ar #25 IuRte Qi Ic CAi d:'al�
face: AcGorcGng;ao'atie drRl' hog,-for'these bare •#toles,. -"in., It to "Ab detect d
, betweeA ,6' td.8' ijjW,M0, remainder: of tt bore' hole We*
the e: aria=testa$ vi++�ro Ito" 2T and 3�'respe�tively,r RsQtt�.�d dll�t�r.pUoddet�i. '
wars kxed.arid;foade to.10' and 1'2' respective ., 'K is;Adr' won t�tial tl t;:b 1'e'
txale' '(0 :on. dr%, Iaay-' opened up a 't?'acture v�d�lch ei4avved xhe ac n, to'
the" akti4aat':ond ca mp a seam jolnv.. tc .open ln, tt`is,:area. Tht `:'seem' : is not` vlg lei. :
dud* ur`Initlel lni 06otion and measurer w t=bf the fats.:
Ity6u. t"Ar�e arty. ad tonal Warmrlltion, p r.tie 'cotitect'-Me 'tt Mur.:mr, of 6-"-"'
( 'C>4)e62s.
-Sind
14�eaorl Buliclr ,
4psraticrrssliAana�r'1llrglnla :. , • . :• , -. ' • ' . '',, .. : � :- ' ' .
cc: Bruce fox.,<.'. ;.
t354 3toA18.H�11:Rosld P:O, Boz''8 :-0 '1r61.'',:• : •: •:
8•: 0*-Clc; SC 2974;4�' ,
Phone (e0j 28�-8185 �' Fex:{$tZ3)83�t8�x

JUL-24-97 THU 11:59 AM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P. 4
To: Don Lineberry and Bill Maccini
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
From ScottHartness
I witnessed the blast made on 7/23/97 at the Benchmark Raleigh Quarry. According to the
seismograph equipment the airbiast measured 129db. In my opinion, the airblast was caused
because of an unknown weak seam at the edge of the blast pattern, This seam was subsequently
blown out. This hazard no ionger exists, and further shots made in the area will not encounter this
particular seam.
Scott Hartness
Mine'aaiety and flea th Representative

JUL-24-97 THU 12:QC PM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P, 5
- Blast No.---F---
Ll
Name of Plant
IRIa0tr;t•ra
®•J i"V %,A A 114
Services
TM Inc.
Van Wyck, sC
Whttesbura. GA
Peterabur , VA PEOPLE. TECHNOLOOY, SERVICE...
9 MAKINO THE CRITICAL DIFFERENCE
n n M t n r%
Date. ., �� a _ Tlmeof Shot -�-L�L:�,�__.
n A a
Location of Blast in Quarry w,. �I (A A.+ A%L n-V X -}� 2
Grid Grid Map Date ►`-1J Bench # 33
0
Weather f Ceiling Temperature Wind From
Direction and Distance Aearest Non -Company PpIlding: Feet I CA2 % Dir. u
Seismograph Locallon A:
Grld A: __ - -- B:
Stationary Seismograph Readings Max. I.P.S. Frequency u 11qAir _
` Shot Dais
No. Hales
Explosives
Hole Diameler
Type
21 e
Pounds
Hole De th
Sub -Drilling
3it
A
Ay . Stem Face Holes
Stem Other Holes
i - "
'
Burden Front Line
Burden Other Holes
Pacing Front Line
19
Spacing Other Holes
I
Tons'Per Cubic Yard
Total Explosive Pounds in Shot
Type of Blasting Caps:
Brand Name
In Hole Caps
Surface Delay:
Surface Delay:
Electric
Delay S9 - No. Used
Delay _ �! S 11 - No. Used
{Von Electric _- E I TL
Delay fytsi.
Delay . 1 A SY P,
Total Cost of Blasi ,Tons in Shot-1r7 W.13 Cost Per Ton
Percent of.Anfo Percent of Fuel II Bulk Loaded
No. Used
No. Used
,
IJ
'1 r
Avg. Explosives Per Hole t ► No. Holes Per Delay __-
f,Aaxlmurh Lbs. Per Delay Powder Factor
Blasters Signature �r►aa %y� Blaster's No.
Superintendent or Foreman's Signatures:

JUL-24-97 THU 12:01 PM BENCHMARK FAX NO. 919 554 1127 P. 6
11
Benchmark Caorlina Aggregates
Slot No. Sail No.
Scale Distance
Max. Lbs. Delay
Type Koch [y-/z /1 wi �cE
Typo Drill
Bit Size - No. Holes
Total Drill Ft.
Drill Hours
Raleigh Quarry 10501 Capital Blvd. Waite Forest 2758
Blast Report Date. 7' Z3_ p %
Tiu.o Fired 9i 'o i9rn
Dist. to Neighbor /4�Q4
Delay Matte
Sut-drilling
.3
Height of Bench
KO
Stemming
7'- !40.0--- 3r"
Burden
16 - IS
Spatting
13
Open or Buffer
Peak Velocity I I ?— . ips Peals Overpressure _- / z F� dB
EXPLOSIVES CAPS
Type pounds De ay/No./1*t. Dee /No./ht.
Total Pounds 07 Tons or CY . Powder Factor
BACKBREAK FRAGMENTATION NO1S8
Min 'air -Severe GsQd.Fair-Poor Loud -Moderate -Quiet
W119111UR DATA
Inversion below 5000 ft. {A Base 3
Top "7 6o
Temperature to wipe out inversion
tixpected High
Temperature at time of shot
Winds
Surface .S'w 5000It.
2000 f t. 53 W1 i 0 10000 f t. 5 W
'1 Or-7 ij rv�'
.Seismograph Distance and Direction from Blast /6 Q©�
B LATIN R
REM"Y%S
rorejuan
Superintendent

�'
^}
a
r
t

' �r
ti
f
•
�, �
�
1�
� �
F•`
.�
f.. j
4',�,�

TW 4--OW P4 ze�
pl-. _ v �. IV , , „ -
low -19
-"-ve
pr
Yuy
') --
-�:""�, � ��v�"'� ;�'�'�✓ ray -�' G
-4e
2°"Zb A
U0 rah
r I A�
rt )

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
November 15, 1996
ova
AL
C)EHNR
Mr. Don A. Lineberry
Vice President
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
P.O. Box 13983
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709•-3983
RE: Excessive Airblast Incident of November 4, 1996
Raleigh Quarry
Mining Permit No. 92.-02
Wake County
Dear Mr. Lineberry:
This letter is in reponse to your November 13, 1996 letter to
Mr. Tracy Davis of.the Land Quality Section regarding the above
referenced.incident. Your letter included copies of investigations
of the incident performed by ES Quarry & Construction Services and
Vibra-Tech. An overpressure measurement of 129 dbl was measured by
your company's seismograph located at Jeffries Furniture around
9:21 am on November 4, 1996.
--This office has completed its review of the investigation
reports and agrees that the excessive arblast- reading for this
shot was related to the items outlined in both -reports. The most
probable cause was internal geologic conditions, such as fracturing
and voids, that contributed to gases venting directly through the
first row face. Atmospheric conditions, such as temperature
inversions, may have also contributed to the incident.
I concur with the remediation measures outlined in the
attachments to your November 13th letter. Primarily, the
remediation measures are as follows:
1) Closer communication between the driller and explosives
personnel shall be conducted. Voids and fracturing are
quite discernible during the drilling process and this
information must be required by and shared with the
explosives personnel.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ IA post-consurner paper

Mr. Lineberry
Page 2
2) Weather related issues (such as temperature inversions)
shall be scrutinized prior to loading an upper level shot
based upon the location and bench level of the shot.
Blasting during temperature inversions should be avoided
whenever possible.
3) A qualified blasting consultant shall closely monitor
your company's entire drilling and blasting program at
this site for a period of 30 days from the date of this
letter. This should determine if any other changes in
the drilling and blasting program are needed to prevent
future incidents from occurring.,
In order to reduce excessive airblast readings in the future
at this facility, the above remedial measures proposed by your
company will be considered part of the blasting procedures outlined
in Mining Permit No. 92-02. Please attach a copy of this letter to
your mining permit for this site for future reference.
If you do not agree that the above information constitutes a
request by your company to modify its mining permit, you have the
right to request a hearing pursuant to G.S. 74-57 to discuss this
matter further.
I appreciate your company's prompt and thorough investigation
and reporting of this matter to the Department. Also, I commend
your company for its excellent recordkeeping and investigative
techniques used'at this facility.
If you should.h4ve any further questions on the above, please
contact Mr. Tracy Davis, State Mining Specialist, at (919) 733-
4574... .. _ _... .
Very truly yours,
Charles,H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/td
cc: Mr. Tracy Davis, P.E.
Mr. John Holley, P.E. (w/copy of reports)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, A.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
November 15, 1996
Mr. Don A. Lineberry
Vice President
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
ATX?FA
A&
r1 !r— ■ ■ A ■ !T7
P.O. Box 13983-
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
RE: Excessive'Airblast Incident of November 4, 1996
Raleigh Quarry
Mining Permit No. 92,-02
Wake County
Dear Mr. Lineberry:
This letter is in reponse to your November 13, 1996 letter to
Mr. Tracy Davis of the Land Quality Section regarding the above
referenced incident. Your letter included copies of investigations
of the incident performed by ES Quarry & Construction Services and
Vibra-Tech. An overpressure measurement Of 129 dbl was measured by
your company's seismograph located at Jeffries Furniture around
9:21 am on November 4, 1996.
This office has completed its review of the investigation
reports and agrees that the excessive airblast reading for this
shot was related to the items outlined in both reports. The most
probable cause was internal geologic conditions, such as fracturing
and voids, that contributed to gases venting directly through the
first row face. Atmospheric conditions, such as temperature
inversions, may have also contributed to the incident.
I concur with the remediation measures outlined in the
attachments to your November 13th letter. Primarily, the
remediation measures are as follows:
1) Closer communication between the driller and explosives
personnel shall be conducted. voids and fracturing are
rmi t-rm r1i enarnihl a r1>>ri nrr i-ha riri 1 1 i nrr nrnr+acc anri thi a
.�.,._..... .�_ ....____-....... ,r,..__--� �--.. .ram.-___--� r-.................. ....,.. ....�..
information must be required by and shared with the
explosives personnel.
Geologicd Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone]M FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Lineberry
Page 2
2 weather related issues tune s o„s) l5u(:11 a� l,elll1Jeral.utc iitVcrnivx+a
shall be scrutinized prior to loading an upper level shot
based upon the location and bench level of the shot.
Blasting during temperature inversions should be avoided
.... eve- possible.
3) A qualified blasting consultant shall closely monitor
your company's entire drilling and blasting program at
this site for a period of 30 days from the date -of this
letter. This should determine if any other changes in
the drilling and blasting program are needed to prevent
future incidents from occurring.
In order to reduce excessive airblast readings in the future
at this facility, the above remedial measures proposed by your
company will be considered part of the blasting procddures outlined
in Mining Permit No. 92-02. Please attach a copy of this letter to
your mining permit for this site for future reference.
If you do not agree that the above information constitutes a
request by your company to modify its mining permit, you have the
right to request a hearing pursuant to G.S. 74-57-to discuss this
matter further.
I appreciate your company's prompt and thorough investigation
and reporting of this matter to the Department. Also, I commend
your company for its excellent recordkeeping and investigative
techniques used at this facility.
If you should have any further questions on the above, please
contact Mr. Tracy Davis, State Mining Specialist, at (919) 733-
4574.
Very truly yours,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/td
CC: k:._Tra_dy- Davis P E
Mr. John Holley, P.E. (w/copy of reports)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
A000% oom% 010L JL
C�EHNR
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE. 11 b ��G
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUAL= SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611
[phone]
FAX NUMBER: 733-2876
.TO:yad
COMPANYIDEPARTNTW% ' 0Ux
PHONE NO.:
FAX NO.: ;�o-?.1q
COMMEI
Wr. d X?P 7WAKCLff7j;VG � VAr_Vc ravr�r r7nrur_ r*nrncb ruLIL"r
i,/a�t{may iis1V if&%JJ kj liT vtJVJ. Z 1V VV Ii1iL LJIAA.. ;IA

1
WR
Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates
Mr. Tracy Davis ,� ✓
NC DEHNR-Phv'VL-A'
Land Quality Section
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
n.-.. n-I _:.-L n..........
i.V1. Raleigh Quany
Blast Complaint
Dear Mr. Davis:
November 13, 1996
RECEIVED
DEHNR
EWW
d 1996
LAND OUALrry S ECTI r�
I have enclosed the following information pertinent to the blast on Sep4afn er 4, 1996 at
our North Raleigh Quarry which exceeded the allowable limit for airblast:
1) Letter from Robert Star
2) Blast report
3) Weather report
4) Letter from Vibra-Tech Engineers
I agree with the analysis of both Robert Star, the blaster, and Vibra-Tech Engineers. We
have already put the corrective measures in place recommended by Vibra-Tech. I have talked at
length with the area manager of E.S. Quarry & Construction Services about this incident. They
will monitor our entire drilling and blasting program at North Raleigh very closely for 30 days to
determine if there are any other changes we might make that will help us prevent any future
occurrence of this type.
Please call if I can be of any further help in resolving this matter. I look forward to
hearing from you as soon as possible.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Don A. Lineberry
Vice President
P.O. Box 13983, Research Triangle Paris, North Carolina 27709-3983
Office: [phone] • Telefax: [phone]

�; i��; r
1' ,� y.

Energetic solutions
November 6, 1996
To: Don Lineberry, Bill Maccini
From: Robert Star
ES Quarry & Construction
Services
1233 Loop Rd.
Stantonsburg NC 27883
919-238-3500 Fax [phone]
RE: AIRBLAST EXCEEDING STATE LIMIT AT BENCHMARK, N. RALEIGH QUARRY
Dear Sirs, 1
On � 4, 1996 we detonated a blast at the Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
North Raleigh Quarry which resulted in an airblast reading exceeding the state allowable limit
of 128db. Details as follows:
The blast was loaded, as planned and in the usual manner. Care was taken to inspect the face
and observe any irregularities. There was an undercut on the face, and some surface cracks
visible on the horizontal surface. During bulk loading, the explosive column was continousiy
checked to account for all product. 1 noticed immediately on the first hole loaded that there was
a void or crack that the product was seeping into. Loading stopped. Two 4" sticks of Power -An
7000 were loaded into the hole, and it was backfilled with #78m. Later, a second hole responded
similarly and loading ceased. Two 4" Power -An 7000 sticks were loaded into the hole, and it was
Backfilled. It required many times the expected amount of stone to completely fill the hole, even
after "choking it off " to seal the void. I estimate less than 30 lbs of explosives was lost into the
void. The balance of the shot loaded without any problems.
The shot was tied in, double checked and the area cleared. I notified the pit foreman about the
voids, and to be prepared in case of venting ( a standard precaution ) .
The horn was sounded, and the shot fired. The shot did vent. The area was checked, and
pronounced " all clear ".
A scismograpii set up at Jelfuies iFul-1 itura registered 129db and 0.1 lips ppv (2200' distant ).
There were no complaints at the time of the blast, Although the owner of Jeffries called in a
complaint at approximately 100pm. No damage was observed or reported.
CONCLUSION:
There are several factors that may have contributed to the high airblast.They are:
1) Build-up of relatively unconfined gas during detonation, in the voids, venting through an
undetected seam on the face.
2) A thermal inversion in effect at time of blast may have focused the overpressure.
3) Freeze - thaw causing rock to spall off the face, exposing a path for venting to occur.
4) Rock fractured or displaced by hole # i exposing the voids or seams in those holes that had
them, allowing venting to occur. ( This is the most likely and significant contributor ) .

Page 2
CORRECTIVE MEASURES:
It is difficult to verify or predict the exact geologic conditions effecting a blast. They are in
many cases dynamic as the rock shifts under its own weight; or even the movement of an
explosives delivery system. Certainly as the detonation sequence progresses the enormous
forces can create situations which are difficult to account for.
We do, however allow for these variances with proper planning, shot design and lay -out.
This is followed by appropriate drilling methods, and re -checking the lay -out before blasting.
Careful and methodical loading and hook-up are essential to obtaining desired resullts. Safety
is our number one priority, and will not be sacrificed. We challenge ourselves every day to
perform our job safer, to do it better, and to minimize our effect on the surrounding environment.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Star
Technical Service Representative
Enclosure: Blast Report, Diagram, Weather Report.

Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Raleigh Quarry 10501 Capital Blvd. Wake Forest 27587
Shot No.
57 Seis No.
Scale Distance
_ 94.41
Max. Lbs. Delay 543 w
Type Rock
GRANITE
Type Drill
HYDRAULIC_
Bit Size
5
No. Holes
2I
Total Drill Ft.
1142
Drill Hours
16
Peak Velocity 0.11 ips
EXPLOSIVES
Blast Report
7179
Dist. to Neighbor
Delay Make
Sub -drilling
Height of Bench
Stemming
Burden
Spacing
Open or Rufier
Peak Overpressure
Date:
Time Fired
2200
11/04/96
09:21 AM
ICI HANDIDET
3
51
52
6
23
11
13
OPEN
129
dB
CAPS
Type
Pounds
Delay/No./Ft.
Delay/NoJFt.
POWER -AN 7000
8441
25/475 32 60
PELLITE, BULK
2099
25/500 4 40
2# CAST BOOSTER
42
25/500 17 30
SUPERFRAC 6000 2X8
21
42MS 5 40
42MS 3 30
OMSTD 1 8
Total Pounds 10603 Tons or CY 13143 Powder Factor 1.239
BACKSRFAK FRAGME.iV'r,1TION NOISE
Minor -Fair -Severe Good -Fair -Poor Loud -Moderate -Quiet
WEATHER DATA
Inversion below 5000 ft. (AGI.
Temperature to wipe out inversion
Expected High
Temperature at time of shot
Winds :
Surface CALM / -0-
2000 fit. WEST / 5
Exact Seismograph Location
Base SFC 30 3800 35
Top 1700 42 6500 44
46 75
57 57
JEFFRIES
5000 ft. S. WEST / 5
10000 ft. W. N. WEST 1 19
Seismo2r$Dh Distance and Direction from Blast 22001 ENE
BLASTER ROBERT A. STAR
REMARKS A blow-out occurred on the face row at the first or second hole. During
leading some ednlesives seeped into k(s) 'n �hn ll T'h: ticed
r{• LV 1111V R �.rWLA J 111 �11G rVl.if. i111A n2lS 11V\14GL
immediately and loading ceased. 4" sticks were used to deal with cracks in
2 holes. No damage or injuries resulted.
Foreman Superintendentff%/%%z�,h:

B eNc N 43
KEY
a
55 pae pe�tA
?,$`4Vll�
F;Q�,j5tiM6

11/05/1996 09:26 9197812412
11/04/00 08:30 V617 976 1001
BENCHMARK CO
WEATHER SERVICUS •-" NELL02
WE
HENCOLUM CAAGIXiA AGGUGATES
Crabtrme, Durk m, Newnan, Frincetm Udg k, Rockv Mount
Fan: 919-235-40901919-781-2412
QUARRY WEaATaLR RRPQRT
PAGE 01
ltOali0nl
Forecaswr
Foreesst Time
Forest Data
7- �O -fs 1
1
J
TEmiltATM [tvamoM Dwlr.►
- Lave ion QAs
Invemio A T o -
Base MY T"ww_
f�
Sam OTY Tamp rp)
�, ,�
3 5 0
Top (F t (On
i
a
TcV (FIV Temp ('n
rav w Bxmk lom i0a (�F j
y 0
TCmp Ia I nmk iRwniivi VF)
,_rpm
_
Is"
Prf" Temp (`m
O
Prmat Temp (OF)
a,
Fc.�t him TcV f°M
�
Fte[ Matt Teanp
WIND DATA
ifir.�rrirm
Seem (KTS)
2m few
w
5,000 Fm
10,000 Faet
Remeeim: d ��a b Haan
Pmpmad by Wcather Sarviou Curpotation
420 Bedfmd Street, Lea ingum, KA& 02173 Tal, 617-676-1000 Fax: 617-67&1001

VIBRA—TECH ENGINEERS 4049855583
1B _ r I H
_ _ 2175-B Highpoint Road, 5neliAle, GA 30278
The Vib tion Monitoring Facperts�. , T `� ._, L..�.� •ti_ :.- �.�. �..,.,�,�-.z�af..,�
770-972-8775 FAX [phone]
-TO: Mr.
Don Lineberry
Be
chmark Carolina Aggregates
FROM: Ch
lie Trettel
DATE: November
12, 1996
Re: AJ
Blast Excess, November 4 1996
Ra
elgh Quarry
Dear Mr. Li�eberry:
This report relates to the above item. We have evaluated the blast and procedures in order to
determine the causes of the excessive air blast level recorded from the blast of November 4, 1996
at 9:21 am, and make recommendations Y'J
that m-y apply to f�ut9-e considerations liir co1ilphiance.
- J
Our review includes observations of the drilling, loading, weather condition, seismic recording
equipment a, id incidental information. Given below is our pertinent observations:
The seismograph, EVERLERT 1I; #7179 was factory/laboratory calibrated on
Septe ber 10, 1996. 1t is working accurately and correct in its observations.
Atmos heric conditions included temperature inversions existing for the day
(Nover iber 4, 1996).
Face c nditions indicated some fracturing and an undercut feature at zero time
detonation (No. I hole).
lntem drill hole condition along the face at initial hole (zero) time suggests
a substantial void existed and a hot spot may have been created.
The tr Ice velocity along the open face was approximately Tv = 520'/sec.
Time df detonation (9:21 am), early morning conditions being cooler could
ampli4 above ground surface transmission.

VIERR—TECH ENGINEERS 4049855583
P.02
I
L/O RD 7
-L-
A re ' iew of the seismic records indicates a recording to blast distance of
approximately 1980 feet and a definite impulse wave occurring very early in
the detonation process (at 12 Hertz).
PROBABIIE CAUSE:
While atmospheric conditions may have contributed, somewhat, to the excessive air kT-'*
vaua, rvG
feel ine molo
probable cause was internal geologic conditions (fracturing and voids) that
contributed gases venting directly through the first row face. This is substantiated by the
impulsive, of late venting of the air blast trace (Enclosed).
CORR.EC WE CONSIDERATIONS:
Closer cam unication between the driller and explosives personnel. Voids and fracturing are
quite disce ible during the drilling process and this information should be shared and required
by the loadi g personnel.
1kr Inversions should be avoided when possible.
The seismog aph calibration was checked and found to be in perfect working order. The
recordkeeping process at Benchmark Carolina Aggregates is excellent.
Should you require additional information, please contact us.
Best regards.)
Sincerely yo ir
VIBBRA-TEO '
Charles W. T
Vice President
CWT/nc
Encl. (St
ENG EERS, INC_
ttel, A.I.P.G.

BENCHMARK CAROLINA
RALEIGH QUARRY
Seismometer at JEFFRIES
i
Blast
57 - -
-Date_
11/04/96
Time:
10.21 �Es•r
17
Instrumentp(�
30.tE r
n�(4�r�"
AirLlast = '_29 d$
0.0
0.5 0.9
! 4
1Z 2.3
2.0
8.2 31 4.1 4A
Transverse = 0.10 in/sec
0.00
0.0
e5 ca
1,4
1-& 2.3
2to
s.2 3.7, 4.1 4Vs
0,25
Vertical = G. f3 in/sec
1
1 I
1
r 1
_020
0.0
0.5 G 9
14
1.B 2.3
2.8
3.2 3.7 4.1 4.6
1 Q.25i
1.oal�iludice{ = U.11 in/s►.c
a. cc,
411:+J��'15r'�titiYti'rl�.;
-0-2J
1
1
1 1
1
I I I
0.0
0.5 0.14
:.4
1.4 2.3
2.6
3.2 3.7 4.1 4A
Response
Spectra
Transverse Vertical
1.0
0.1
0.013 10 50
vib•ra.-tech engin.ee-rs
Lor�rtuAinal
.% : w
O�L ill- i j
1.0
0.1
LID 50

LAND QUALITY SROTTAN gr_A(MM ANILYctS WDoecWugr
(' = denotes fields where input data is needed)
Permit No.*: 92-02
Permittee+: Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
!Rine Names: Raleigh Quarry
Blast Report NoJ: 57 Date of Blast*: 11/04/96 Time of Blast: 09:21 AM
Peak Particle Velocity Check:
D = Distance to closest offsite occupied structure (ft) : D* = 1980.0
W = Maximum pounds of explosives per delay (pounds) : Wt = 543.0
SD = Scaled Distance: SD = D/W'0.5 SD = 84.96993
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second!: V = 160 (SD)'-1.6 V = 0.131
(+max, limit in mining permit is: V = 1.0 ips)
Based on known distances from the blast to the seismograph and any additional location,
the expected vibration level can be estimated at the second location as follows:
V = Particle velocity measured by the seismograph (ips): V* = 0.11
DS = Distance from blast to seismograph (ft): DS+ = 1980
d = Distance from blast to second location (ft) : d* = 20D0
PPV = Theoretical peak particle velocity at the closest offsite occupied structure (ips) :
PPV = V(DS/d)'1.5 PPV = 0.108354
Airblast {Overpressure) Check:
P = Unconfined Airblast/Overpressure (psi): P = 82 (D/W'0.33)"-1.2 P = 4.109849
To convert (psi) to (dBL): (P/2.9 x 10'-9)log x 20 P = 151.568
AB = Confined Airblast/Overpressure (dBL): AB = P AL) - 35 dBL (for quarry situation) AB = 116.57
(=max. limit in mining permit is: AB = 128 dBL)
@T. Davis 6/24/94
Gn/i��9G

_ _
.�•. �
.., i
�.
.' �
'� ..
�
� �,

11/14/96 Mining Permit -One Page Report Page t*t
Permit No.: 92-02 Owner Name: BENCHMARK CAROLINA AGGREGATES
County: WAKE Mine Name: RALEIGH QUARRY
Region: 5
Contact Person: STEVEN EDGERTON Phone: [phone]
Street Address: P 0 BOX 13983
City: RESEARCH TRIANGLE State: NC Zip: 27709
Commodity Code: CS
Mine Status: A
Issue Date: 4/09/72
Permit Revised Date: 4/21/95
Total Acres Permitted: 437.00
Release Date:
ARR Rec'd Date: 2129/96
Last Inspection: 5/08/96
Last NAn.
No. Insp./Yr.: 1
Latitude: 3592816
River Basin:
Appl, Rand Date; 3/15172
Public Hearing Date:
Expiration Date: 11/25/02
Date Denied:
Total Acres Bonded:
Type of Bond: B10
Bond Amount: 500,000.00
Next Inspection: 5/06/97
Last NOV:
No. Insp. to Date: 0
Longitude: 7854833
Quadrangle:
tACRES DISTURBED ANNUALLY* (No. 2 on the ARR form):
Tailings Ponds: 0.0 Stockpiles: 0.0 Wastepiles: 4.0
Prvv,° ..� Plant: V.V nitire M1iic Area: V.V Total: 4.0V
*ACRES RECLAIMED AND RELEASED ANNUALLY* (Central Office input/delete only!)
Tailings Ponds: 0.0 Stockpiles: 0.0 Wastepiles: 0.0
Processing Plant: 0.0 Active dine Area: 0.0 Total: 0,0
*CUMMULATIVE ACRES DISTURBED/UNRECLAIMED AT THE SITE* (No, 4 on the ARR form):
Toilinnn ilnnrin. ti A C+nnbnilnn. 11 AL1wn+nw:1.. '19 h
1 R11111y ] iVllyq. 1d.V QLV,, AlJ 1An LJ.V R48LC�l 11G�. JL.V
Processing Plant: 29.0 Active Mine Area: 59.0 Total: 156.0
Central Off. Comments:
Regional Off. Comments:

�!
�- . y
� .
r _ � �
-

-III
III
III
41'rerr�
-7� 1* r-4 Pn*o
lil
III
-N3 rwrcua,� .<r one%!
I�
�r�4D�'Vy�rG�f�y j19
I

Yj
t
c
i
ti
�� t,�„�,s • _ ;;t� ��`f
�•���� r;�, r� ill ��•�'� �. �"�� �' 4"''- .: :�! _
.5. i
:�„^-�;C -
.
- � 11 ,. � .� t4 `�. A�L/ �.
. _ ,ti '� � , . w�\� .. Y �• � j
�l,+.p'.iy' �` ��
1..
i
y
`
jt _ ''�ry ?i k " __ � s 1"'�y.� R �i. ;� '�y"�- � • . -�'
`�'��'• •%�S �
t.r.�tlja �5�.�� .'t 'S
��� �� 9l'`•
jjj
4 �
)
'q
iti t

A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
April 21, 1995
&w N—lvFVA
DEHNR
Mr. Don A. Lineberry
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
P.O. Box 13983
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
RE: Modification Request for Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Lineberry:
Your r[PcCent rprn7act t_n have the below rcferen�er� �nininn
permits modified has been approved. The modification is to
change the corporate name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. The following permits are now
officially issued to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount II Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton II Quarry
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
As this is considered a permit modification, please attach a
copy of this letter and the resulting permit document changes to
each permit document currently held by your company.
Please note that Nello L. Teer Company still has two permits
that have not been included in this name change. These sites are
Permit No. 30-02 (158 Sand Pit) and Permit No. 99-07 (Poindexter
Sand Plant). Your company must immediately take the necessary
steps to provide adequate bonding for these sites or submit a
request and tee for a conorat¢ name nhanap fnr Parch Mite
Geological Survey Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
Land Quality Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
Geodetic Survey Section
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
} P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
`�' An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

AL
Mr. Lineberry
Page Two
Please review the modified permit information and advise
this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Joe Glass, P.E.
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
l�fr .Teir y CAA]C

DEPARTMENT OF ENV2RONMENT ,
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RESOURCE S
D = V2 S = ON OF LAND IRE:' S
LAND QiJAL='TY SECT2ON
Y E It M x '1'
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The Mining Act of 1971-," Mining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Benchmark Carolina Aggregate, Inc.
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
whi nh chnl l nrnvi Aam that +- gyp esi 4-tr
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION ---DATE MBER 25 002

Page 3 of 10
November 22, 1991:,This permit has been modified to,allow the on -site
remediation of petroleum contaminated soils as indicated in the
information dated September'5, 1991 and in accordance with the rules
and requirements promulgated by the Environmental Management
Commission.
NoveMber 25,This permit has been modified to allow the
expansion of the existing pit and the construction of the
corresponding sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on
the Erosion Control Plan dated March 1992 and revised August 1992.
May 27. 1994: This permit has been modified to allow the construction
of settling ponds as per the plans received by the Land Quality
Section on April 5, 1994.
April 24, 95: This permit has been modified to change the corporate
name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until
November.25, 2002.
conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and -Quarry Dewaterinq
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in
a va�.iV %A"11 with the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to the
requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means that
may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from
leaving the permitted area.
3. Duffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters or wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Paqe 8 of 10
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining
Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly associated with
the mining activity may be disposed of in a designated
refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of
in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Solid
waste Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or'
their storage containers or any other material that maybe
considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the
permitted area.
C. Contaminated soil remediation shall be allowed as indicated
on the site map submitted to the Land Quality Section with
the additional information dated September 5, 1991 and shall
be in accordance with the rules and requirements promulgated
by the Environmental Management Commission. Only petroleum
contaminated soils shall be stockpiled onsite.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
14. B nndinng
The which was- nncter7 tp rsulant to AT r r_ c 7R-A ; ,, the
form of a $500,000.00 blanket bond is sufficient to cover the
operation as indicated in the approved application. This
security shall remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological eso ces
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

State of North Carolina
Department of EnvironmenT,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
Mr. Steven Edgerton; P.G.
Nello L. Teer Company
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina
RE: Permit No. 92--02
Raleigh Quarry
wake.County
Dear Mr. Fdgert-nn
May 27, 1994
&VFKWA
LI 0
J.X�4 *ilk
I : >EHNR
l
27702
v
X7)0 NZf_ a 7-A91
6t .
Your recent request to have Mining Permit No. 92-02 for Raleigh
Quarry in Wake County modified has been approved. The modification
allows the construction of settling ponds as per the plans received by
the Land Quality section on April 5, 1994. A copy of the modified
permit is enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily upon
the initial annl i rat i nn _ Mnd i f i rat- i nnc worc manic gc indir A+aA by thin
rr -
modification request and as required to insure compliance with The
Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date, mine name'and permit number
shall remain the same as before the modification. I would like to
draw your particular attention to Operating Condition No. 4D.
On January 1, 1994, the reclamation bond rules were amended.. The
new reclamation bond has been calculated for this site using the
information submitted on the renewal application dated April 4, 1992
i '
rc�c GA I—, T 4—
and tho —rifat viv'lwo7G..L.4~1V1V1C11�Z1� 1 cJ,I.— Giu%d _Lt
1994 (see attached worksheet). The new bond amount for this site is
$273,600.00. However, please note that the cap on reclamation bonds
is now-$500,000.00. Said bond must be posted by August 15, 1994. If
you intend to submit a new $500,000.00 bond to cover this and all
other mine sites you currently have permitted with this Department,
this office will return your existing $25,000.00 blanket bond.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it
does not supersede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with any applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
As a reminder,.your permitted acreage at this site is 437.0 acres
and the amount of land you are approved to disturb is 157.0 acres.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
(919)-733-2423 [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Ariirmafive Action Employer 5n recycled/ I(a post -consumer paper

Mr. Edgerton
ragePage
T. iwV
Please review the modified permit and advise this office at (919)
733-4574 should you have any questions concerninq this matter.
Sincerely,
Tracy E. Davis, P.E.
State Mining Specialist
Land Ouality Section
TED/jw
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley

NINE
ON
BQM
99,QMMION__ SHED
(based upon 10-year
mine/affected
area plan)
Permit No.
Permittee: 4el9D Ziey
Mane Name : -.. ,�C1�GlQ.�
l rf'
-- -
^
. (SEE BACKOF THIS PAGE FOR
_.
SCHEDULE OF -RECLAMATION
COSTS).
AFFECTED
.RECLAMATION
REC[AMATION
-CATEGORY: -
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE
COST
Tailings/
Sediment Ponds
/0 Ac'.
X
$ 15-6o pO / Ac.
Stockpiles
�.:� Ac.
X
$1 00/ Ac.
Wastepiles
_ED Ac.
X
$ ADOD°� / Ac. _
$ pO
Processing Area/
Haul Roads
a9.O Ac.
X
$ 9,00e / Ac. -
$ z5
Mine Excavation
/D/,8 Ac.
X
$ 4W&j / Ac. _
$ Z.�j4o0
Other
Ac.
X
$ / Ac. _
$
TOTAL ACREAGE:
S . D - Ac .
SUBTOTAL COST:
$ . �7 Roo
ADDITIONAL RECLAMATION COST FACTORS:
a. inflation: O
for permit
life
of-1 to 5 years:
SUBTOTAL COST
X 0.10 -
$
N
for permit
life
of 6 to 10 years:
SUBTOTAL COST
X 0.2 5'
$ 3 ip p 0
b. Mobilization:
SUBTOTAL COST
X 0.40 --
$ / Dd
c. Administration:
SUBTOTAL
COST
X 0.20 =
$. Q•CJ�
a - + b + c $ r 60 + SUBTOTAL COST
TOTAL RECLAMATION BOND COST: 00. 60

Bond Based Upon: Annual Reclamation Report Form Acreage
roved.10-Year Mine/Reclamation Plan
Rema rocs : Amgzd,q� � n•-� - '�^� Del � (fit P+-' f �t '70�,t
Bond Calculated By:
Date of Bond Calculation: JS-�3-

T%IMMIMP W X=Pr"7Uf'VPihlTr" &—%I % 1 "9INX XTyUVu'M-W1h7"r1ro
L iJ Ji-�ii-i JJ ii i Lim
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RE S OURC E S
D 2V2 S 2 ON O F LAND RESOURCE S
LAND QLTAL = TY S ECT 2 ON
P E R M = T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through
68, "The mining Act of 1971 , •• raining Permit Rule 15A
NCAC 5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and
regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Neilo L. Teer Company
Raleigh Quarry
Wake County - Permit No. 92-02
for the operation of"a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity
and scenic values of all lands and waters affected by
this mining operation will receive the greatest
practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION A OVE BER 25

Page 2 of 10
In accordance with the.application for this mining permit, which is
hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity
with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as
part of this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the
surrounding environment and for reclamation of the land and water
affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is expressly
conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved
Reclamation Plan: However, completed performance of the approved
Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the
expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception: If another operator succeeds to the interest of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale,
lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the
permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his
permit and by the Mining Act with reference to the permitted
operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided
that both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining
Act and that the successor operator agrees to assume the duties of the
permittee with reference to reclamation of the affected land and posts
a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permitteefs successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve
the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may
give the operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or
suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as
incorporated in the permit. The -operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification,
revocation or suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in
addition to the above, the Department may institute other enforcement
procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly, indicates otherwise, terms shall have the -same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modification
August_ 15, 1220: This permit has been modified -to include an
additional 105 acres of land(areas B and C) as indicated in the
modification request and aerial photograph received by the Land
Quality Section on November 3, 1989 on which only the construction of.
the overburden disposal area shall be conducted as per the revised
Grading Plan dated March 1990 and received by the Land Quality Section
on June 20, 1990 with several stipulations. .

Page 3 of 10
November_22, 1991: This permit has been modified to allow the on -site
remediation of petroleum contaminated soils as indicated in the
information dated September 5, 1991 and in accordance with the rules
and rernii ryrntmkl nataA by the Vnvi rnnmcni-al Man;%t7CP-MO" -
Commission.
Nov -ember 25, 1992: This permit has been modified to allow the
expansion of the existing pit and the construction of the
corresponding sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on
the Erosion Control Plan dated March 1992 and revised August 1992.
May 27, 1994: This permit has been modified to allow the construction
of settling ponds as per the plans received by the Land Quality
Section on April 5, 1994.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its. issuance until
November 25, 2002.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act,
N.C.G.S. 74-45, et. seq., and to the following conditions and
limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Ouarry Dewaterina
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be -in
accordance with the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission.
2. Air Quality -and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant
emissions including fugitive dust shall be subject to the
requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. During quarry operation, water trucks or other means that
may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from
leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer7o2es
A. Any mining activity affecting waters or wetlands shall be in
accordance with the requirements and regulations_ promulgated
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Page 4 of 10
B. Sufficient buffer (minimum of 100 feet undisturbed) shall be
maintained between any affected land and any adjoining
waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from
erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity
of the natural watercourse.
C. The buffer zones shown on the Erosion Control Plan dated
March 1992 and revised August 1992 shall be maintained to
prevent caving of any adjoining property and to allow
grading of the side slopes to the required angle. These
buffer zones, with the exception of the installation of
required sediment control measures and earthen berms, shall
remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to
diversions, earthen dikes, silt check dams, silt retarding
structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in
the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to
prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface
areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity
to the affected land.
B. The construction of the overburden disposal area shall be
conducted as per the revised Grading Plan dated March 1990
and received by the Land Quality Section on June 20, 1990
with the following stipulations: (1) Diversion Ditch A,
from Sta 0+00 to 1+90 shall be provided with a suitable
temporary liner (i.e straw with netting or an acceptable
alternative), (2) the minimum weir length for all sediment
traps shall be ten (10) feet, (3) all No. 5 washed stone
filters shall be provided on the upstream face of the
sediment traps only and not on the top or backside of said
structures, ( 4 ) the �N L.L—L aU IL existing �lViiu shall slC
constructed with a 20 foot bottom width, (5) the minimum
thickness for Class A stone treatments shall be 9 inches,
for Class B - 22 inches, Class I - 18 inches and*Class II -
24 inches, and (6) the proposed slope drains shall be
considered permanent and provided with 12 foot long NCDOT
Class I rip rap aprons, 18 inches thick as a -minimum. Any
changes in the permanent control of surface water runoff in
the overburden disposal area shall be addressed by a revised
sediment and erosion control plan and submitted to and
approved by the Land Quality Section prior to its onsite
implementation.
C. The Erosion Control Plan. Sheets EC1 and EC2. dated March
1992 and revised August 1992 shall be followed.

Page 5 of 10
MP
The Settling Ponds
Quality Section on
following addition:
of SB-1 prior to th
silt fence shall be
have been completel
Erosion Control Plan r
April 5, 1994 shall be
silt fence shall be
e construction of SB-1
maintained until both
y constructed and stab
eceived by the Land
followed with the'
erected downstream
and SB-2. Said
settling ponds
ilized.
V' An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted
to the Department for approval prior to any land disturbing
activities not indicated on the revised erosion control plan
or mine maps submitted. with the approved application for the
renewal of this mining permit and. any approved revisions to
it. Such areas include, but are not limited to, expansion
outside of the pit area, creek crossings, or expansion of
overburden disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
Groundwater monitoring wells shall be installed and monitored'as
deemed necessary be the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
7.
8.
A. The angle for graded
than the angle which
other adequate erosio
device. In any event
channels, the erosion
because of siltation,
with groundcover, dev
slopes and fills sh
can be retained by
n control measure,
exposed slopes or
of which may cause
shall be planted o
ices or structures
restrain such erosion.
all be no greater
vegetative cover or
structure, or
any excavated
offsite damage
r otherwise provided
sufficient to
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the any pit
openings disturbed after the date of renewal of this permit
shall be graded to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter and shall be stabilized within 60ds of
completion. Furthermore, a minimumC4we3ty (255)]foot wide
horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the top of the
rock and at the toe of the overburden slope.
Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of
pools of water that are,'or likely to become, noxious or foul.
Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or conduits shall
be constructed I or installed when required to prevent such
conditions.
(Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the
findings of any seismic studies conducted at this facility. The
nncratnr chal I i nlr r,rr_s...
a i- 1UUrpUr--L.- it _
ALI"J%G avc_xrea.7VllQLJ1C orro l. l.0 11al.0 L11C
studies' recommendations into the production blasting^ program.
o I

Page 6 of 10
The following blasting conditions shall be observed by the
operator to prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from
thrown rock or vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations,. except as hereinafter otherwise
provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of any .
component of ground motion shall not exceed 1 'inch per
second at the immediate location of any -building outside of
the permitted area regularly occupied by human beings such
as dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building outside of the
permitted area. The operator shall monitor each blast with
�L
a SeLa1ttUgraP11.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not. exceed 128 decibels linear.
(dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building such as any dwelling house, church,
school, public building, or commercial or institutional
building.
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure
that flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is
temporarily or permanently guarded by the operator. Should
flyrock occur beyond the guarded area or the levels in Items
A and B above are exceeded, the operator shall report the
incident to the Department immediately and further use -of
explosive at the site shall -be immediately suspended until
the following actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the
incident shall be conducted.
2. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation shall
be provided to the Department within 10 days of the
i-nRi clAn+- _Sai d report shall, at a minirEiUML Alm II_n _t
r,..a �, �«, ...Vlr+ A"J l+I.
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and
management actions that will'be taken to prevent
further incidents.
The report shall meet with.the approval of the Department
before blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take
corrective measures to prevent flyrock and repeated
instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of this
permit.
D: The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of'holes and
delay ofintervals; depth and size'of holes;.type and total
pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval;
amount of stemming.and burden for each hole; and blast
location. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's
.mine office and copies shall be provided to the Department
upon request.

Page 7 of 10
9.
10.
11.
E. The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give
24 hour advance notice to the Land Quality Section prior to
any blast during a period for which notice is requested.
High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to --end
or fencing shall be maintained at all times around the perimeter
of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. In
addition, for any pit walls disturbed after the date of renewal
of this permit, a minimum 25 foot wide horizontal safety bench
shall be provided at the junction between the top of rock and the
toe of the overburden"cut slope.
Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and
public thoroughfares to screen the operation from the .
public. Additional screening methods, such as constructing
earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed appropriate by
the Department.
B. Berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Erosion Control Plan, Sheets EC1 and EC2, dated March 1992
and revised August 1992. In addition to grasses, loblolly
and/or Virginia pines shall be planted as deemed appropriate
by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire
to delete, modify.or otherwise change any part of the mining,
reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan contained in the
approved application for the renewal of this mining permit and
any approved revisions to it_ Approval to imnlpmpnt c„rh nhnnnaS
must be obtained from the Department prior to on -site
implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that are
generated outside of the mining permit area shall be allowed
within the boundaries of the mining permit area unless
authorization to conduct said disposal has first been
obtained from both the Division of Solid Waste Management
and the Land Quality Section, Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources. The method of disposal shall
be consistent with'the approved reclamation plan.

Page 8 of 10
13.
14.
B. Mining refuse -as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining
Act of 1971 generated on -site and directly associated with
the mining activity may be disposed of in a designated
refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of
in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Solid
Waste Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or
their storage containers or any other material that maybe
considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the
permitted area.-
C. Contaminated soil remediation shall be allowed as indicated
on the site map submitted to the Land Quality Section with
the additional information dated September 5, 1991 and shall
be in accordance with the rules and requirements promulgated
by the Environmental Management Commission. only petroleum
contaminated soils shall be stockpiled onsite.
Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form
supplied by the Department by February 1 of each year until
reclamation is completed and approved.
Bonding
The security which was nosterl nur--uani- to N_r_r_G_ 7A-sa ;n tha
form of a $25,000.00 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the
operation as indicated in the approved application until August
15, 1994. On or before August 15, 1994, the security shall be
increased to $500,000.00. This security shall remain in force
for this permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not
exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
History shall be granted access to the site to determine.the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 9 of 10
PROVED RECLAMATION__PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance
of which is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining
Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation
of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining
Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G. S ._ 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and
other unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to
minimize the possibility of slides and be consistent with the
future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must
be provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which
i c in ar_r.nrannra with an.r.AntpH nnnczervat i nn nranti npR and wh i nh
is suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on
the mined area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or
foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan,
which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation
simultaneous with mining operations and in any event,.provide
reclamation at the earliest practicable time after completion or
1rGilAi iLG 4l Vii vL uL.LiiilLg viA QiLy ..3 G g 411 Gi i%- -W J. 41Ae per il114 Gr eR Q41%A w711 Gi1i
be completed within two years after completion or termination of
mining.
la���,�i����.i�Ti7►i�7i�ii��[s7►�'ia
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation shall be to allow the quarry excavation to
fill with water, provide a permanent barricade (fence) along the
top of any highwall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface
suitable for the planned future use are as follows:

Page 10 of 10
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or
waste piles disturbed or created after November 25, 1992
shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
slope and terraced as necessary to insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds or sediment control basins shall be
backfilled, graded, and stabilized or cleaned out and made
into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas
neighboring the mine excavation shall be leveled and
smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise
prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine
site. on -site disposal of waste shall- he in. -accord-Wna .e w t1L,
�rvwwr. �.+. .J4 yv; VlidilVG W1411
Operating Condition 12A, B and C.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection
of noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the
1?etrarYcta�i nn Man r�ret,�r�d '17 r]�„T n �,..i.� .a .,a ...a �...�..s-&- y c
'��..��.-.•• jr; yt✓ui �I l .. I- i.all{1j-L Gl. %A %-G IA Ali lj µ.74 10,
1991 in the application for renewal dated April 4, 1992.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as
soon as feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion
or termination of mining.
This permit, issued April 9, 1972, renewed April 9, 1982,
modified August 15, 1990 and November 22, 1991, and renewed and
modified November 25, 1992, is hereby modified this 27th day of
May, 1994 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
Charles-H. Gardner,.Director
ni ui Ri nrf ref T.anri Aacniurnec
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

DATE TO ASSISTANT — DATE TO SUSAN
LOGGED IN
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING Pak D
Company d'j ect Name
-03 51- n6z
Permit No .-q;�-01 County I iNMAJDate Received 0_ QnAc-
Reviewer
07
Please make copies of check to include with Central Office and
Field office files and log in checks. / �,,�
�, f—, �--a� !1 IY1 q m lye-,
* U New U Renewal U Modification U Transfer U Release
❑ Ad tional Information ❑ Fee Needed
Fee Received: Amount 950100
Please r ute to:
Field Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* U Archives and History
❑ Other:
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
Suspense Date for Comments:_ y -19'9) (Date received +30 days,
not on weekend)
Please note the following: �ZLA-w �-Jzwz' kdl'QC%
* U SAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

%110
Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates
March 17, 1995
Mr. Tracy Davis
NCDEHNR
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
IE C M-YIE
MAR 2 0 1995
Subject: Corporate name change from Nello L. Teer Co. to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Dear Mr. Davis:
This letter is being written to reauest that all Mining Permits r_.ii"ently ascignerl to "Nelln T Teer
Company" be changed to reflect the change of the corporate name to "Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates". The name change is effective immediately. Please find enclosed a check in the
amount of $750 ($50 per 15 permits). Also find enclosed a modified "Land Entry Agreement"
for each site reflecting the new corporate name and a copy of the statement regarding the name
change on the blanket reclamation bond. The following permits should be changed:
Permit Number
Mine Name
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
51-05
Princeton Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel
4
%-ape rear Sand o[, Gravel
68-06
North Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham (Orange) Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
29-13
Lexington Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
P.O. Box 13983, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
Office: [phone] Telefax: [phone]

Page 2
All property owners, company addresses, responsible persons, etc. will remain unchanged. We
will forward a notarized copy of the bonding information as soon as possible. Please send us a
copy of the new cover page for each permit confirming the name change. If you have any
questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
OC
Donald Lineberry f ,
Vice President

ZIa_a a
APPLICATION FOR A KINING PERNUT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the De�rt ent or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of malting necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
APPLICANT
Signature Signature * �;V, 4, 2 ,
Print Name: Print Name: Donald A. Lineberry
V
Address Title -
Vice President
Company: Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Telephone Mine Name:
Raleigh Quarry No, 92-02
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
the approRrIate processing ree (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check or money order
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent
to the Land Ouality &dlon Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application
form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff
at [phone].
-19-

,va
Author: Charles Gardner at NROLR01P
Date: 1/15/97 1:45 PM
Priority: Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: Tracy Davis
TO: Mell Nevils
TO: John Holley at Internet
Subject: Re[2]: Benchmark Carolina Mine U.S. #1 N. of
------------------------------------ Message Contents
Yes, I concur. Let's make it as simple and easy
of course.
Charles
&',nj -0,
A /1 n
q ou
Raleigh
------------------------------------
for them as possible,
Reply Separator
Subject: Re: Benchmark Carolina Mine U.S. #1 N. of Raleigh
Author: Tracy Davis at NROLR0IP
Date: 1/15/97 8:24 AM
Mell, Charles:
I recommend that Steve Edgerton send us an updated mine map
delineating the location and size of the "mulch" area, as well as any
access roads and their associated S&E. He can attach a letter that
describes the activity and requests that it be allowed under the
mining permit. Then, we can draft an approval letter for your review.
Do you concur?
Tracy
Forward Header
Subject: Re: Benchmark Carolina Mine U.S. #1 N. of Raleigh
Author: "Holley, John L." <[e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 1/14/97 3:52 PM
I discussed this with both Terry and Steve Edgerton today. Steve
informs me that the area they are considering is near the south end
of their property behind Burlington Mills, between the railroad and
the river. This area is within their permitted area, but not within
their approved affected area. Their intent would be to lease the
area to NCDO'T for operation of a mulch stockpile/ processing site.
They would expect NCDOT to prepare a S&E plan and maintain the site.
Benchmark Carolina would likely have access to use some of the mulch
for their reclamation activities as well.
i reminded Steve that 'this change would require a permit
modification addressing the area to be affected by the operation
(including access/haul roads). I noted that Benchmark Carolina would
be responsible for compliance at the site under the Mining Act. He
acknowledged his understanding of this scenario. I noted that I did
not see any immediate concerns with the proposal, and that we would
be happy to facilitate the arrangement as much as possible in light
of the potential savings to the state and taxpayers. I suggested
that he contact you or your staff to discuss the particulars if they
elect to move forward with the proposal. If there are any quettions,

plecQ.e advise.
.'*> 'From: "Terry clover SSH W Superv:" <[e-mail]>
> Organization: FRO DEHNR
> To: [e-mail]
'33 EST Jan Y
�n 1997 12.3K
> Date: Tice, L� u.. _
> Subject: Benchmark Carolina Mine U.S. #1 N. of Raleigh
> Priority: normal
> John,
> Would you please call me after you return from lunch regarding this
> site. I have had discussion with Steve Edgerton and he has expressed
> an interest in helping with mulch from Fran. He has a site in mind
> which covers approx. 50 acres and is adjacent to the river. It is a
> closed area which would need certain clearances from you all.
> DOT may interested in a long term arrangement on a site to use the
> mulch in the Raleigh area. Benchmark Carolina does not want to
> receive material just for their on utilization.
> Thanks, TERRY 910-486-1191

Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
1MGCfMi� I 1 �tU 111U1Vt)
1. MINE NAME 1 . 2. MINING PERMIT# -Z-
3. OPERATOR a 4. COUNTY !jAwgr-
5. ADDRESS //3 ��r?N_-��. ,ems, a77G% 6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE ff-a i"-.7a-0'&
7. Person(s) contacted at site OZ _ rc.,o-►!
8. Was mine operating at time of Inspection? Wyes ❑ No 9. Pictures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
10. Date last inspected:__/ 1# 11. Any mining since last inspection? yYes ❑ No
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ;-Yes ❑ No
11 no, ovnl-ain•
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
15. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
16. Other recommendations and comments: rrd .1govA;no" c
Rc-C1f4yfi}7`I Afy-q jriS —
17. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? KYes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
18. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes )2FNo Proposed date_1
19. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 20. Copy of Report sent to operator ;" / S 141
(date)
INSPECTED BY: DATE�_I 1 9�
Phone No: ( *q ) 57I
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
9/91