68-06_2_Redacted

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
'(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME MOO h D(C!, XV I'V LI 2. MINING PERMIT # i 11,� .0( n
3. OPERATOR,'HA k 1"-Itir-) IY)(() �•I , h,,(_4. COUNTY Or�11) ct"
5. ADDRESS �r�li C-cll E� !��(�r1 CP1'l f ?'e AXOf t i -Wi K W., LLI l � J
G. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 7. RIVER BASIN 11(' (I"f _-W ! /r-?,� - al •Q {
8. Person(s) contacted at site ,))O i I '
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? A Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes No
11. Date last inspected: 1- 7) I n,), 12. Any mining since last inspection? ❑ Yes N„No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? Xyes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? [3tYes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: i A I A .
17. Other recommendations and comments: �'i YC MUCLI -r;l) +4 Dp! l(� rl")CI
k
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/-map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) Not Reviewed
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes No Proposed date--/---/-
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report_ . 21. Copy of Report sent to operator rl-Jfl I0E
1 1 4 INSPECTED BY:_`f,14`���-{ �.i1ia� , .,"h) 1r1��}'���ii(tC�a���`�Ii�CS �1 DATE D 1(1`1/,��
Telephone No: (ffi1 l )`16YI . l . nn (.0-
White cony to Tle y Yellow conv to operator Pink cony to Minim, Snecialist 10197

■ Complete items �,l ,`2and 3. Also`com�a
let
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the hack of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR RGBERT N SNYDER
HANSGN AGGREGATE SOUTHEAST
2300 GATEWAY CENTER BLVD
MORRISVILLE NC 27500
!A. Signature`
X 0 ❑Agent ❑ Addressee
S. �ReceiWd h Panted Name) C. Date of Delivery,
..1j
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
It YES, enter delivery address below: ❑. No
,3. S price Type
9r Certified Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Insured Mail.
❑ Express Mail
Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from servfce label) jr : r;; r : {; t .s fill
�t i � SS11L 1 i it L�'
PS Form 3811 st 2001 Domestic Return Receip# 1e2595-02-M-1541 ,Augu

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
111111 Permit No. G-10
. Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box .
AENR-DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
1612 MAIL SERVICE
RALEICH NC 27 ���XjTFD
� AN � s zoo¢
�, [}t l lilll llll ii t ll3ll llllllll #I I11IFIlltill 11114

i t •
Co. Seeks
i g e��t�or
'
0 ello � Teer Co. wants. H LHsborou •h : to overturn ,. ua n� -. b
_ g q �y�ate.
By RAY GRONBERG firm has contemplated icing the aife fors "protect a"project threatened' rnun ? tween Miller Road; arid.: New ShatFon
the ChapeE Hal Herald'".:; :. a crushed stone quarry. action. Also pending - -` Church' Raad Fox. and Knight are build-.
end alsdn•;{va4 I ,� . 'HILLSBOROUGH= A."Mining company. Annexation would overturn"a b'ati on ■ Backeis of the' controversial Uiil=' ing a higirpnced subdivision near f$e
uom x sad locked ..in a, court . battle with Orange quarrying at the site imposed by the Or versky' Station "rural' village" want the. landfill site . ,.
County officials is the latest land, Bevel ange County Board of Commissioners in : ' town to resurrect their plan by annexing . Sue,w nnaplsa il. ; v r to, beat what is been project All three requests involve "satellite an-
-au cool la ming a- well- 1985. Company attorneys have - since ° 100 acres, off Old N.C. 10. The ro'ect is
I u< A1.1� M . [trodden path to Hillsborough's door.': filed at least. five 'lawsuits .seeking to 'stalled becnexation" a provision in state law that
ause of.opposition from neigh- allows Hit] a The NeHo, L. Teer Co. has. asked town overturn that ruling• bors and tine -county commission.-,:..: sborough .and other, munid-
ramaeazdm} , ; i officials to annex about 150 acres located Teer's request is. the third time in ii- . 0' Randolph Fox and Vic Knight have palities to annex islands of property that
Ii i' at'Interstate Interstate 40 and New Ho Church cent months that a developer has so lie within three miles of the town limits.
3o nopiod t Pe pe sought asked the -town: to forestall a proposed
.
tu�vl i .Road Since the early i980a,..the Durham .annexation by Hillsbotrough.to revive or crounty lMM'by annexing 240 acres be- a please see _TE�RYB
oy�a>al
NA
s ate saauaw t ,
ilia Jo.6.tn>�
,'�I•
r01 ltd
-
3tl ]aMall
,� a� �''
` • . a
T E E R FROM 3
-
f • ,1114
.,Conventional annexations,,,in~ :Hillsborough from; annexing the-'. property,. tax windfall. art- . •for Hillsborough •.:< k with company offctals, could.
p�iNSM
volve land adjacent to the town
site. ;
nexation :could mean fora the'-. In zl letter sent to ;Mayor ., not be, reached fora statement:
j�yHSN3ll�
limits, .,.;t,- :' .;f.ti�r
" I " wouldn t even think ;'of
town, ;but..=Carey. cautioned' ;Horace johnson.last,week,-they,, ..rhe mayor has been, one bf tile::
:The Teer:.p%perry, part'of a :.threats,"
26&acre tract is 'hope
Will cif;: -said "l'.just
'against'allowing:economics to-;;aiso-'promised to'give"the town' leading','champions'-bf satellite:
-
'rights ''[he
L�7 �
L
paralleling i240,
barfly .,Within that, three mile 'prevail
that; common sense yo,uld.
=' �' ""' `.
''
outweigh sound policy, . ..:.,� , toquarry. after tt >s .',.,annexation, articularl
'The; issuej. is:`whether the t`emPtied in abou 40 years. They `, a oflJniverstity Statzon e
would
11
x, r',s x !i,•
QCounty,offiaais reacted barsh-T:
Co* ��<ion C)iairm'ih Moses
Carey jr; laughed• when told'of .
town be acting within its suggested . than,Hillsborough t v-
legal bounds -and whether;.tbe``.could use the pit;foi; water sior ` fl�eFlS Univers:t}h� 5tahon
ly: when the' University Statioa Teer's' proposal a said the de
anneuatiou :plan' i�me to'.lighti eisioti' wouM be p to HilLstior
_
town .mold :provide the' . npc age, much as OWA$A offcials advocate +;Tdwr $oarcL membe .
; essary services," he said.;%The f plait do with, a `stmilar :mute : Bob Rose,_said tliat he
during, the:.wuiter; But two ,of
those officlals 'both named -as
i defendants.
ough officials.. =:'.:'
:'But he added he hoj�es
.to j .woulc
county; ii not in a bidding war , 'aeat ': Bethel Hickory , G;ove '.lrave�"to think �abouf, the" real
'with anyone.: We're ,for;'cliordi Church Road � s'�� � �inen�of the Nello;TeePplan;
Hated logical a*+��ro` 'i�_
in Nello Teer's law -.'..town'
officials eonsider the'gos-
growth,,* Rumors of ansimpending an �3it dae3 no> prvtnde;the same opj >
suits—greetedIthe latest' Bevel-, 'sible
political fallout• —,collapse
itasbest W. earl " vexation,. request- .Trbm;: Ne110 - portunities to.,improve.Hillsbor's:.;
oPment with "resti'aintWonday::; -
of long-ntnning. Wks on a; coop-
. -_ Teer officials estimate :.that ..- Teer have arculated among Hill --CPU gh s ,-infrastructure .that Un I
"the;
'Commissioner£ Doix -Willhoit'
erative Lind be-
'valve
quarry,.would+,have "a"tax 'sborough oifiaals;for. at:Ieast ,-* err
rerstty Station offers �,' +•
noted'tliat: cvunty''offidals:"re;,
tween.the:.towrecand.county'
-of around-S4'million once ,`two.,months Bui comment from r•�
I main opposed to:a "quarry in -the
going ahead. -with any.:of `'.
fa full operation, a fsgure,that 2t.i:'those officials was -scarce. Mon ;=1t doe have one, alE [tie -same`
; .before:
N 'Hopei.[ lurch` Road .azea the'annexatiots� ;i ..:
ay . _.: 1 ,` dlrawbackshhe awed We `d
.current' `rates, translates':.; Into '. day.,_
by"tddclined to ;specify'.ivhat ar
,Hillsborough exparisioa advo•
roughly'S20,000:a year in"ad _ Johnson; named,tn'Teers Iet-;...know tt'S"going to ughten the .
lion they could take to'dissuade `
Cates have: touted the potential ;
ditional property: ,tax' revenue ter as having held:'disnusions .' county'; Jaw;'severely.
f

DATE TO ASSISTANT - DATE TO SUSAN
LOGGED IN
NIINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING i'nv''4. DZ4,�
Company �" �'ect Name
AP
Permit No. N 3:3-/5 County r4&,0Date Received
11
Reviewer �a wo
"_ �T Qa�A1r��I,f
Eld-15 rvl� V
Please make copies of check to include with Central office and
Field Office files and log in checks.
* ❑ New ❑ Renewal. ❑ Modification © Transfer LJ Release
❑ Ad �ional Information ❑ Fee Needed
❑ Fee Received: Amount 950,06
Please rpute to:
E�,�1�' `-C1 Field Office
❑ Wildlife Resources Commission
* ❑ Archives and History
❑ Other:
suspense Date for comments: V- /9"9� (Date received +30 days,
not on/.weekend)
© Please note the following: /i'i CP �•� (� r. " '�
f 1_6 ,f'l/�� h �11 � L� �.I-�V-1,(� `� L❑ �i 11'1f /i"r'.i�' " [ �t. �l i•'i �.�.{ 1 �� - f UI 1��1
Date Routed_
Date Routed
Date Routed
Date Routed
*SUSAN: Please make file and return Checklist and file to Reviewer
White Copy to Field Office Yellow and Pink Copies to File Goldenrod Copy to Susan

dD
Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates
MAR 2 0 1995
March 17, 1995
Mr. Tracy Davis
NCDEHNR
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Subject: Corporate name change from Nello L. Teer Co. to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Dear Mr. Davis:
This letter is being written to request that all Mining Permits currently assigned to "Nello L. Teer
Company" be changed to reflect the change of the corporate name to "Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates". The name change is effective immediately, Please find enclosed a check in the
amount of $750 ($50 per 15 permits). Also find enclosed a modified "Land Entry Agreement"
for each site reflecting the new corporate name and a copy of the statement regarding the name
change on the blanket reclamation bond. The following permits should be changed:
Permit Number
Mine Name
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
51-05
Princeton Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel
68-06
North Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham (Orange) Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
29-13
'Lexington Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
P.O. Box 13983, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
Office: [phone] Telefax: [phone]

Page 2
All property owners, company addresses, responsible persons, etc. will remain unchanged. We
will forward a notarized copy of the bonding information as soon as possible. Please send us a
copy of the new cover page for each permit confirming the name change. If you have any
questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Donald Lineberry
Vice President

APPUCAT ON FOR A MTNTNr. PFRMI'T
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Miring Act of 1971.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries
on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in
order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is
ordered pursuant to G.S. 74-59.
Signature
Print Name:
Address
Telephone
APPLICANT
Signature *
Print Name: Donald A. Lineberry
Title:
Mice President
Company: Benchmark Carolina Aggregates
Mine Name: North Durham Quarry No, 68-06
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
the aparopriate prom tog fee (see next page for fee schedule) to the form a check or money order
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources must be sent
A _ Al-m 7 ,...J 11.._�!a-. C�_Ll�.- I'r_�a�! 111V':__ .a a4_ _JJ�� l:�_J aI- .t—_—a _! &L!-
to we Laud' QuaI LJJZtdion _Centrual VlllLe at the adds aO lL1LUU on we alvut cover Vl Lull UPPIll.aLLVII
form.
inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff
at [phone].
-19-

• The News & Observer, Raleigh, N.C., Saturday, Sept. 12,1992
FFederallaudgef,&­diNmisses-NelloTee'rqu­arr.
suit
By PAMELA BABCaK Firm had sought $S-r. rriillon from Orange County for zoning: decision
Staff writer
GREENSBORO — A federal
judge has thrown out a $5 million
lawsuit filed by a Durham compa-
ny against Orange County.— the.
largest suit,ever filed against the
county .in response W.a zoning
decision. '
U.S. District Judge Carlton Til-
ley ruled that the county's deci-
sion did not violate the company's.
rights and that the lawsuit was
filed too late.
'In April 1989, Nello L. Teer Co.
sued the county, maintaining that
it was prohibited in i985 from
operating a quarry on a 146-acre
tract at New Hope Church Road
and Interstate 40. The suit con-
tended that the county_ took- --a
series of zoning -actions — includ=
ing adopting a strict rural buffer
zone requirement— expressly to
block the company's plans. ' -
- In the suit, the company' not
only sought punitive damages, but
also said the county's action'de-
prived Teer of its right to use its
property andviolated the' state
and U.S. constitutions.'
Tilley's opinion, issued Thurs
day; said Teen's claims exceeded
the nine -month statute of limita-
tions for contesting the -validity of
any zoning ordinance or amend-
mentsto it.
,•He_also ruled that the county's
actions=did not violate the compa-
ny's constitutional rights because
the company. lacked a permit to
operate and therefore nothing was
taken from -it.
"Any sophisticated construction
company; such .as Teer; which
buys or leases land for possible
development -.-in an urbanizing
area, such as Orange. County,
must be deemed to do so with the
knowledge that local governments
may adopt or amend zoning regu-
lations at any time," Tilley wrote
in the opinion.
- G: Nicholas Herman, a Chapel
Hill lawyer representing the coun�
ty, said he was pleased with the
judge's decision. Also named, in
the suit were county commission-
ers Shirley E. Marshall, Don
Willhoit and Moses Carey Jr., who
were on the board at the time.
"It's a real sigh of relief for. the
county and its citizens," Herman
said Friday.
Herman said Teer officials have
contended -that the damages they
incur increase daily and that their
'inability to operate the quarry -is
costing- "millions of dollars in
profits.
Teer officials declined to com
ment on the'ruling and company
attorneys could not'be reached.
Friday.
The company first filed'suit in
Orange County Superior Court in
October 1987, seeking $2.5 million,
but later dropped the suit before it -
went to trial.
In April 1989, the company filed
a new suit in U.S- District Coupt;
seeking $5 million in damages;
The suit claimed that the county
in-early--1985 imposed additional
site requirements for mining op`
erations, followed by a moratari-
um -on•-. mining and finally the
restrictive rural buffer Zoning.
The company also has an identi-
cal - laiwsuit; seeking, $5 millio"n;
pending in Orange County Supe'ri=
or Court. Action on -that case %5as
stayed pending'the:outcome of the
federal suit, Herman said.. '
Herman said he' is confident the
county can win that case because
the nine- month ,'statute' ol" limifa-
tions also will apply in than case.

Section
B
The News & Observer I Saturday, September 12, 7992' Raleigh, N.C.
t d Sno'
.; fooiin'•
By A.C. Snow
Misdialing
diter midnight
. g
Let him who has never dialed a
wrong number be the one to yell
into the phone, "No, stupid, this is
not the Soak and Sew Laundro-
Program, seeks to- head off child abuse, neglect
By FRAN ARRINGTON
Staff writer
RALEIGH The call came in
the middle of the night. Three
children in trouble,.- abused and
neglected by a_motber high -on -
drugs.
When Wake County social work-
ers got there, the dazed mother
had no idea where one of her
toddlers was. Police went door-to-
door in the East Raleigh commu-
nity and eventually Pound the
child safe at a neighbor's house.
"One officer said, `We've saved
these three, but what about the 300
others.but there?' " recalled Lin-
da B. Johnson, program manager
of thefamily and children's divi-
sion of the Wake County Depart-
ment of Social Services. "This
was difficult to take, but it was
a f'
something we needed to,hear. ,,,
. Ever since that•night.several
monthsago, Johnson said, she and
other social workers• vowed. they
would focus more attention on,
preventing such situations.
As a result of that commitment; -
Social Services — in conjunction,
with other local agencies and
community groups —. will by
[November implement Families
and Communities Together, a pro-
gram designed to identify families
at high risk for abuse or, neglect of
c'hildren: -
, The project will target families .
in the College Park Community in.
East -Raleigh, an older neighbor-
hood. of 14,000 families: Johns on..•
said the.area was chosen because
a high incidence of abuse and
neglect occurs there, and -be -cause
of repeated, reports of substance
abuse or, criminal activity , by„•
some residents.
Social Services workers will act.
in conjunction with'soliools, com
munity groups, the County Health
and Mental Health departments,,
hospitals and other agencies to;
identify potentially troubled fami-
lies,
The prograffi-woqfdwork. this:
way: After a' mother,ifrom the;
See TROUBLED,Ypagg 2B

State 'of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor July 27, 1987 Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
Mr. & Mrs. Gary Wicks
Route 2, Box 209
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
RE: Nello C. Teer'Co.
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wicks:
Thank you for your brief note and request that this Department hold a
public hearing concerning the above referenced application for a mining permit.
This office has received four (4) letters from persons voicing their general
concerns over the proposed operation. Of these four, only two are from
adjoining landowners and only one, yourselves, have requested a public hearing,
In comparison to the total number of adjoining landowners and the response
the Department often receives relative to such issues, the degree of public
interest expressed to date does not warrant the expense of conducting a public
hearing.
Hnwpuav, renresentatives of this Section would be h^ t0 « t «t,
t.-�...... .. c, happy meet wi. Ll YOU
individually and review The Mining Act of 1971 and the steps taken in our review
of mining permit applications. You also would be afforded the opportunity to
express those specific concerns you have regarding the proposed North Orange
Quarry.
I attempted to telephone you with this information but the long distance
information service had no telephone number listed in your name. Because of
statutory requirements on the permit application period, please advise
immediately at [phone] should you wish to have such a meeting.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
J4J
mas E. Carro411,P.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEC/sl
cc: Mr, John Holley
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmarive Action Employer

State of North Carolina
rl�r�rtir+m1-rIf ref L-1 IVIi%�r1rrInr�+
III i i i ,�, I v, �, ,v a v, u , i;Z71 u ,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B• uu, It, Jr., Goverl or
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Charles Gardner, P,G„ P.E.
Director and State Geologist
April 21, 1995
ANCKWA
Mr. Don A. Lineberry
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
P.O. Box 13983
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3983
RE: Modification Request for Corporate Name Change
Dear Mr. Lineberry:
Your recent request 'to have the below referenced mining
permits modified has been approved. The modification is to
change the corporate name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark
Carolina Aggregates, Inc. The following permits are now
officially issued to Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.:
29-13
Lexington Quarry
32-01
Durham Quarry
32-07
North Durham Quarry
33-13
Rocky Mount IT Quarry
36-28
Bessemer City Quarry
41-18
High Point Quarry
43-03
Elliott Sand & Gravel Mine
43-21
Cape Fear Sand & Gravel Plant
51-05
Princeton IT Quarry
68-06
North Orange Quarry
92-02
Raleigh Quarry
92-03
Crabtree Quarry
92-13
Holly Springs Quarry
98-02
Neverson Quarry
98-13
Elm City Quarry
As this is considered a permit modification, please attach a
copy of this letter and the resulting permit document changes to
each permit document currently held by your company.
Please note that Nello L. Teer Company still has two permits
that have not been included in this name change. These sites are
Permit No. 30-02 (158 Sand Pit) and Permit No. 99-07 (Poindexter
Sand Plant). Your company must immediately take the necessary
',steps to provide adequate bonding for these sites or submit a
request and fee for a coporate name change for each site.
Geological Survey Section Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Lineberry
Page Two
Please review the modified permit information and.advise
this office at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
CHG/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Mr. Joe Glass, P.E.
Mr. Doug Miller, P.E.
Mr. Jerry Cook

DEPARTMENT O F ENV= RONMENT �
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RESOURCES
D= V= S 2 ON OF LAND RESOURCE S
LAND QUAL = TY S E CT 2 ON
P E R. M T T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The
Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other
applicable laws, rules and regulations
Uormi cci nn i c harc}-hv rrrani-d=A i-n-
Benchmark Carolina Aggregates, Inc.
North Orange Quarry
Orange County - Permit No.68-06
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will
receive the greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION__ DATE:_February 5, 1998

Page 2A of 9
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which
is hereby approved by the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department, and
in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and
incorporated as part of this permit, provisions must be made for
the protection of the surrounding environment and for reclamation
of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the
requirements of the approved Reclamation Plan. However,
completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation, secured by the bond or other security on
file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the
following exception: If another operator succeeds to the
interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by
virtue of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department
may release the permittee from the duties imposed upon him by the
conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference to
the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor
operator, provided that both.operators have complied with the
requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor operator
agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or
other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan
or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to
achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the
Department may give the operator written notice of its intent to
modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to modify the
Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator
shall have right to a hearing at a designated time and place on
any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by the
Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized
by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context
clearly .indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as
supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
April 24, 1995: This permit has been modified to change the
corporate name from Nello L. Teer Company to Benchmark Carolina
Aggregates, Inc.

Page 2B of 9
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance
until February 5, 1998 and shall be subject to the provisions of
the Mining Act. N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq. and to the following
conditions and limitations:

Page 7 of 9
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in
l t.� L�.�... �t hGAA AAA AA L'� .. ... Ke bion-7 .L`l`.: .�L L0
C.ile for a of a .7JUU � V V V VU L,L an'lC I. J.JVilLA ,LS Su l .i dent L-
cover the operation as indicated in the.approved
application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not
exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and
riistory shall be granted access to the site to determine the
presence of significant archaeological resources.

e �. gAll o V
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary February 5, 1988 Director
Mr. James Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Company
211 W. Parrish Street
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
RE: North Orange Quarry
Orange County
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
The application for a mining permit for North Orange Quarry in Orange
County has been found to meet the requirements of G.S. 74-51 of The Mining
Act of 1971. As your company already has a blanket bond sufficient to cover
this application, Y am enclosing the mining permit.
The conditions of Mining Permit No. 68-6 were based primarily upon
information supplied in the application with conditions added as necessary to
insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. This permit expires on
February 5, 1998. G.S. 74-65 states that the issuance of a mining permit
does not supercede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with the applicable zoning regulations lies with you.
Please review the permit and notify this office of any objection or
question concerning the terms of the permit.
Sincerely,
U
T omas E. Carroll, P. G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEC/cjt
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
RO Box 27697, Palcigh, North Carolina 17611.7687 iekphonc 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Emplom

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Regulation 15'NCAC
5 B, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Nello L. Teer Company
North Orange Quarry
Orange County _ Permit No. 68-6
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
value1 of all l 1 n-A, pnA wp+ere nffnr+nA N%, thi c mi ni nn nnarati nn
s �i u� �ullm. uIIm Rol\ J NI J ' -r--
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

Page 2 of 9
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved
Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the -land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception- If annthor nnpratnr ciirrePdc to the intprpct of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease,
assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from
the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the
Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the
permit to the successor operator, provided that both operators have
complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or other
security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the
purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the
permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in
the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a designated
time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or suspension by
the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definition-,
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by
the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Conditions
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by
the Environmental Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until February 5,
1998 and shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46,
et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

Page 3 of 9
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
Any wactawater prnreccing nr minP dPwatPrinQ Shall be- in. accnrdance with
the requirements and regulations promulgated by the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, Water Quality Section.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and regulations
promulgated by the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, Air Quality
Section.
The access (plant entrance) road shall be paved from its junction with NC
57 to the office/scale house. During quarry operation, water trucks or
other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent dust from
leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural
watercourse.
The buffer zones shown on the Resource Development Plan dated May, 1987 and
revised September 21, 1987 shall be maintained to prevent caving of any
adjoining property and to allow grading of the side slopes to the required
angle. These buffer zones, with the exception of the installation of
required sediment control measures, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from discharging onto
adjacent surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity
to the affected land.
The Sediment and Erosion Control Plan dated May, 1987 and revised December
21, 1987 shall be followed. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall
be submitted to the Department for approval prior to any land disturbing
activities not indicated on the revised erosion control plan or mine maps
submitted with the approved application for a mining permit. Such areas
include, but are not limited to, expansion outside of the initial pit area
C 19.40 acres), creek crossings, or expansion of overburden disposal
areas.
Suitable rip -rap gravel filter cheek dams, instead of silt fencing, shall
be provided in areas of concentrated flow along the south end of the berm
along N.C. 57, southeast end of the berm north of the Wick's property, and

Page 4 of 9
southwest corner of the small berm located southeast of the Temporary
Sediment Basin.
5. Groundwater Protection
The six observation wells denoted as (0-1) thru (0-6) on Figure 1 of
Appendix B submitted with the approved application for a permit, along with
the wells located on the Doug Barris and Bruce DeWald tracts, shall be
monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of
consolidated material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the
determination of pre-existing (static) groundwater levels.
The observation wells -shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock
and grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended to the
first water bearing zone in the consolidated rock. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The necessary
permits to construct these wells shall be obtained from the N.C. Division
of Environmental Management, Groundwater. Section.
The observation wells shall be monitored once per week at the same day and
approximate time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months following the
installation of the wells. The static water levels shall be referenced to
a datum point and a record of the water levels maintained. The weekly
precipitation and the volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded.
Copies of these records shall be provided to the Department on or about the
end of each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may be
increased or decreased following the initial twelve (12) month period as
deemed appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any
excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage because
of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with groundcover,
devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the pit shall be graded to a
minimum 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical and shall be stabilized within 30
days of completion.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of
water that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent such conditions.

Page 5 of 9
B. Blasting
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of any pre -blast
surveys conducted. Furthermore, the operator shall provide to the
Department a copy of the findings of any seismic studies conducted at this
facility. The operator shall make every reasonable effort to incorporate
the report's recommendations into the production blasting program.
The -following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided,
+hn MMVim..- n t, —1n 44— _- -4- .--r ...d ..4-:
L.uc uiunii�iu�n Ncun Vol Llik.ic VU_1UL icy Ui any %iniiponeiiL vi grou+iu lllVk lore
shall not exceed I inch per second at the immediate location of any
building regularly occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or institutional
building. The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear (dBL) as
measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied building
such as any dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building..
C. The operator shall take all
flyrock is not thrown beyond
permanently guarded by the o
guarded area or the levels i
operator shall report the in
further use of explosive at
until the following actions
reasonable precautions to insure that
areas where the access is temporarily or
perator. Should flyrock occur beyond the
n Items A and B above are exceeded, the
cident to the Department immediately and
the site shall be immediately suspended
have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall
be conducted.
2. A satisfactory renort dPtailina the invPstinatinn shall hp
provided to the Department within 10 days of the incident. Said
report shall, at a minimum, document the cause(s) of the
incident along with technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further incidents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the Department before
blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take corrective measures
to prevent flyrock and repeated instances of flyrock shall be
considered a violation of this permit.
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of
intervals; depth and size of holes; type and total pounds of
explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall be maintained
at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.

Page 6 of 9
E. The operator Shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour
advance notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. HiQh Wall Barrier
A physical barrier of oversized rock shall be maintained around the
perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access.
10. Visual Screenin
Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between
the mine and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the
operation from the public.
Berms shall be located as shown on the Resource Development Plan dated
September 21, 1987 and shall be constructed prior to initiating quarrying
activities. In addition to grasses, the berms shall be planted with white
pines having a minimum height of four (4) feet on a 6x6 staggered spacing.
11. Plan Modification
The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to
delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or
erosion/sediment control plan contained in the approved application for a
mining permit. Approval to implement such'changes must be obtained from
the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
No on --site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that are generated
ou a� l uc u i 4nc iii 1 n 1 ng perm 1 1, area Ana i uc allowed i vrvcu w 1 6n 1 n Lnc Li CIUa i i c) of
the mining permit area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from the Department of Human Resources, Division of
Health Services and the Department of Natural Resources, Land Quality
Section. The method of disposal shall be consistent with the approved
reclamation plan.
Refuse generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity
may be temporarily stockpiled on -site in the Surplus Material Storage Area
prior to periodic removal for offsite disposal.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.

Page 7 of 9
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$25,000 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated on
the approved application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeolocical Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources.

Page 8 of 9
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of
which is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit.
Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the
permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize
the possibility or slides and be consistent wit'rl the future use of
the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be
nrovidAd in all excavation-, in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is
in accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is
suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the
mined area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorporated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan, which
shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with
+t...,� ,i 'n nnl. nl.ant nvuxjirin reclamation at the
ni +i+irig operations 0I1V 111 µlly l �i ll{ , NI -'y
earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining
on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation as depicted on the Initial Relcamation Plan dated
September 21, 1987 shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with
water, provide a permanent barricade along the top of any highwall, and
grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 9 of 9
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable
for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or
waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter slope and terraced -as necessary to insure slope
stability.
B. The primary and secondary settling ponds shall be back -filled and
stabilized. The retention pond shall remain as an acceptable lake.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the
mine excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise
prepared before revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site.
Scrap metal, trash or other such waste shall be removed from the site
and properly disposed.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of
noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetaiion Plan:
nictiirhod nranc chatl he ncrmnnnn+lv rcvcnn+n+.aA at-f-nb—Ainn +n the Coadhnd
r/-. J 4.4�44Y LLY y l.V LLYV{,.Y
Preparation and Seeding Schedule provided on Drawing 6 of 6 of the Site
Plan dated May, 1987.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as
soon as feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or
termination of mining.
Permit issued this 5th day of February, 1988.
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of.Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development

TO
DATE
SIGNED
WlllsonJonea • CabMI - MADE W U.S.A,
4 -OM 700"ts • O Wit -iw . INN
SPEED UMR �
FROM DATE
j Phr4-,
/1.. ..u�.... .a. lid ii
SIGNED
SENDER: DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY, SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES

NELLO TEER
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY, P.O. BOX 1131, DURHAM, NC 27702 USA
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
RECEIVED
J U [V I y '09 *1
June 12, 1991 LAND QUALITY SECTION
Mr. Tracy Davis, E.I.T.
N. C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Davis:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation on June 11, 1991,
this letter will serve as notice of Nello L. Teer Company's
intent to construct an asphalt plant on our North Orange
Mining Permit No. 68-6. The asphalt plant will be
constructed in the area shown on the plans as the plant
process and stockpile area of the new site. The erosion and
sediment control for this area will be constructed as
approved by your office on February 5, 1988.
Please find enclosed along with this letter a xeroxed
copy of the asphalt plant location in relation to the plant
and process area on the original mining plan. Should you or
your staff have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
Steven S. Edgerton, P.G.
SSE/dg
Enclosure
CC, File

ylp ELL Rl�f '\ \-,.` �'�•\ ( f� \� T
„
i FF '
�:•. ` EVE
,Fe AREA OP. NA AL RE£>OURC� .
' :t.. `•fir; �\., \'
RM \
Xh .•7 7t: f +• � 1•` '• fit'. `.-...__,
t o ', 1 � J � t f� � •
v
�✓` i! Tf t. �ry� 1 !�1>, 'r ILT,•'t
yet yl f. G t' Si 1l Y�ii S % f
1 T TtON 0AM J
Wool
fit, J a f RIP OAD
C
�aYr t { /:. lil t. t its• iy / o L
31.55
hS f tJ WIZIr 12CIA, J'
Y \1
I s ra • 1�' NEW a 6 R 46
I R�
DITCH' L CL S
APR PROC
r•' I ,, $ AR �\
AND: s
f1 \r�' y � "hip �• ;, 1`'� ki' 1 (,�[�\}
y \ } ! I N \
,• . \ \ t, ;.: ', k r % / VIEW ER 1 N
r ..i� �\` ♦ f'� \�:i ';kid t � •� /' ' 1 — _ UTC — \ �1
f` 1J SiIT ENCE
SHOP ,fi, % ,�% SET LING. •� �,
A I I 1
.ITT].SILT FENCE
1 r.
tj
y6'.
r•!1�"r !{vt Y� .. r° I� f r � /. i, r % .• / / (': / ,!
KIM
/
,•�T` � ,S ',:c � _, `, :{t? y � � -.4 tY3'�' ��t ,� I 1f .���y.�+•I;� � i:• �\11. I��,`\� �• \�\�;:�i
„YtJ 'r � � i �X,. A ;l �i c �r t J '/,— �..I.1� •

LAJ

Date:
To:
From:
Re:
I -and Quality &-ctiUll
Memo
9� Time:
I_ !I ti 's IU_ I ■ I_ I ..
/ f
1 �

'y•
�.,
,
•
S
•
�
�.
�
�
• �
�
i
.
�. �
�
r
`
�•J ..
� �
.
�
-
'
� � •
•
� � �
'
•
h
Y
<
'
1 i
�
-•
.y
. l
,
� Y

w"
[V E—= I_ IL D L_ T >= E= F Z C p NA P A ICJ Y
A Subsidiary of Koppers Company, Inc.
P. O. BOX 1131 DURHAM, N. C. U
OFFICE TEL: [phone] . TELEX: 57.9446
July 28, 1989
Mr.' John Holley
N. C. Dept. of Natural Resources
and Community Development
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
RE:
Dear Mr. Holley:
S. A. 27702
40
North Durham Quarry
Commencement of Construction
Pursuant to the conditions as set forth in Mining Permits
#68-6 (Orange County) and #32-07 (Durham County), this is to
advise you that construction activities shall commence at the
Rougemont site immediately. We anticipate construction of the
access road and the embankment for the retaining dams within the
next two to three weeks.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
NYV�
ames R. ??Sp4rAi`nkle
perations Manager
JRHSldg
CC: Tom Carroll
File
FOUNDED 1 909 CITYOF MEDICINE, USA

N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
Telephone Log ff
Datc:��,� Shcel —J—of f
Time: ❑ am Call: Placed )K—Reccived ❑
;R�Pm Returned ❑
2. Conversation with:
3. Affiliation:
4. Content of conversation:
cc: Filed by:
, tr I
County:
Telephone: an,C��7i�/1�i

r i 1
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.~
v TtA
512 N. isburS! Street, Ralcigb, North Car(,limi 27611. 919-733-•d1 1
Ch;irles R. Ful]\ti-(,Od, B cutive Dircctor
October 16, 1987
�O
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Carroll, Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section, DNRCD
FROM: Don Baker, Program Manage
Habitat Conservation
SUBJECT: Nello L. Teer Company's Proposed North Orange Quarry
Application, Orange County
The Environmental Assessment proposed by Robert Goldstein and
Associates adequately addresses fish, wildlife, and wetland impacts
associated with the subject project. We strongly suggest that the
conclusions and recommendations presented in the Environmental
Assessment be strictly adhered to including efforts to mitigate
unavoidable losses and agency review of construction, mitigation, and
reclamation plans prior to issuance of permits.
Thank you for the opportunity for comment on this project.
DB/lp
Enclosures

. qz-q 1?7
PV&it,S��'�"r;�� 1` N "r RECEIVED
CEC 31 1987
�HASITAT CONSERVATION SECTION
Kate of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street a Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 1987
TO: Don Baker
Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Thomas Carroll Q�
Mining Specialist Y"
Land Quality Section
RE: Nello L. Teer Company's
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Orange County
Stephen G. Conrad
Director
You will find attached for your review a series of six site plans 0"=200')
for the above referenced project. The Nello L. Teer Company proposes to
construct and operate a crushed stone quarry at this site which is immediately
adjacent to Highway 57 in northern Orange County.
Please review the site plans and advise as to the possibility of the
operation having an unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater fisherieh
(G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by October 23, 1987 so that we may complete
our review of the permit application within the statutory time limits.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type applications is very
much appreciated.
TEC/sl
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
PQ Box 27687, Rakigh, North Carolina 27611.7697 Tekpftone 919-733-3833
An EqtW OWommity AffimatKv Action Empbyer

I IC,/ r
1-z-/"ql v iz,-- I„ L+ .
kk�
VV.
�e
Mate of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resourtcs
512 North Salisbury Street a Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 1987
TO: Don Baker
Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Thomas Carroll Q�
Mining Specialist K"
Land Quality Section
RE: Nello L. Teer Company's
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Orange County •-
Stephen G. Conrad
Director
You will find attached for your review a series of six site plans (P -200')
for the above referenced project. The Nello L. Teer Company proposes to
construct and operate a crushed stone quarry at this site which is immediately
r adjacent to Highway 57 in northern Orange County.
Please review the site plans and advise as to the possibility of the
operation having an unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater fisheriet
(G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by October 23, 1987 so that we may complete
our review of the permit application within the statutory time limits.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type applications is very
much -appreciated.
TFC/sl
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
P.0 Sm 27607, wkioK North Grdn„ 2761k76u Tekphnrx 91*733.M3
.An FaLni Oeerim—v. . Ai i--w A..w... C 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
F-It"WTSion Of Land "Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary September 18, 1987 Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Baker
Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Thomas Carroll?
Mining Specialist �+"
Land Quality Section
RE: Nello L. Teer Company's
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Orange County
You will find attached for your review a series of six site plans (1"=200')
for the above referenced project. The Nello L. Teer Company proposes to
construct and operate a crushed stone quarry at this site which is immediately
adjacent to Highway 57 in northern Orange County.
Please review the site plans and advise as to the possibility of the
operation having an unduly adverse effect on wildlife or freshwater fisherieb
(G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by October 23, 1987 so that we may complete
our review of the permit application within the statutory time limits.
Your continued cooperation in the review of these type applications is very
much appreciated.
TEC/sl
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
P.O. Bout 27697, RakiRfi, North C:arokina 27611-76E7 Tek -omne 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Affimutiw Action Empk rmr

® North Carolina WAdhfe Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Rlleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
�C y
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director O '•
October 16, 1987
U
`rF
D,y
MFMORANT)13M
TO: Tom Carroll., Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section, DNRCD
FROM: Don Baker, Program Manage
Habitat Conservation
SUBJECT: Nello L. Teer Company's Proposed North Orange Quarry
Application, Orange County
The Environmental Assessment proposed by Robert Goldstein and
Associates adequately addresses fish, wildlife, and wetland impacts
associated with the subject project. We strongly suggest that the
conclusions and recommendations presented in the Environmental
Assessment be strictly adhered to including efforts to mitigate
unavoidable losses and agency review of construction, mitigation, and
reclamation plans prior to issuance of permits.
Thank you for the opportunity for comment on this project.
DB/lp
Enclosures

41
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources *
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section 10Lu
INANE INSPECTION REPORT LAND QUALITY SECTION
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME ,(/Or s , n r,•. 2. MINING PERMIT # edp- d
3. OPERATOR _A0G11 4. COUNTY 4-4,v r
5. ADDRESS z// W e sk Ad, 4A //3/ L)�t�a�. �(.rC°±- -� 7 a Z
6. Person (s) contacted at site
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection'? ❑ Yes ❑Er No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes No
9. Date last inspected: - /_ 1 i7 I Sf 10. Any mining since last inspection ? r, ❑ Yes Q No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? Q Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? [D'Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in oftsite damage ? ❑Yes D No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures needed and / or taken:
15. Other recommendations and comments:.gt/ _ _/1r �,'d, f/► _ 1s �',vrrr, /a, o.- �. far/. •� S: ��
16. Is the Annual Reclamation Report + / - map accurate ? 0 Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? ❑ Yes [E^N6 Proposed date
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report j�r 19. Copy of .Report sent to operators/ -y 1g a.
' (date)
INSPECTED BY: sf X.� S�v/ Gi�r DATE: t 1 Z 9 1
Phone No: (,gyp
White copy to file Yellow oopy fo operator * Pink copy to Mining Specialist
arcs

��
•,
x
-,

MEMO_
ro: qr
LP s
AP,r4wtr&.z>q
DATE: (0 �_Oj
SUBJECT: _&49 'fin 7
JI
�-c7o IG� U .� N�[ [ c.c. (c73L•-� �y+it� to ["� �'[la
C3 ?�i 5r ++IMITS
I C6C- M41 --(b Is VJ�Ate
o uzz a ' Urm�
Gp( 1 G APO G H'! Imo-- ep
pL�D►A k�X 'R,=d J�m�ri a� G�j g� SA-A�5 SPn�r► c. uG ? n-
North Carolina Departm"eff bt Natural
40
- Resources &Community Development

North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Developf 'ent
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section n� 1 S `
TION REPORT
����� y89
MINE INSPEC
TION. ,, o
, (PERMITTED MINE) C�/O
I
1. MINE NAME l I6�46F / 2-,�-1 etc 2. MINING PERMIT# 3.,>-DT
3. OPERATOR 1VF1L,2 �67, Q4. Aml : t4r, S-rr%/,F 4. COUNTYUZAN(r- la.tTr. r1AM _
5. ADDRESS1�2 1111 Q'rt-AM MC "1"30;
6. Person (s) contacted at site
7. Was mine operating at time of inspection ? ❑ Yes []Y No 8. Pictures ? ❑ Yes X No
9. Date last inspected: 1 I 10. Any mining since last inspection ? Yes 0 No
11. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit ? El Yes No
If no, explain: ;►
12. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit ? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
13. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage ? Yes No If yes, describe the type
and severity of the damage:
14. Corrective measures �e(��dand / or taken: _9+L1�rCt +ntES Artf�-l+��tw�i-I 5 7
t +1-r- i:1Qb7 , nl - -
15. Other recommendations andcomment-s + cF SO4re RySr urcT.
16. Is the Annual declamation Report + / - map accurate ? [Z Yes ❑ No (Explain) Not Reviewed
17. Follow-up inspection needed ? 0 Yes No Proposed date 1 1
18. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 19. Copy of Report sent to operator--d -/89.
�1
(date)
INSPECTED BY: ^t.�7V 011wtt-/ DATE:
Phone No: ( ) � 3 • c a i •'
White copy to file Yellow copy to operator Pink copy to Mining Specialist
REV, Bl8B
I
L

. .,
.. .. � ..
- ..
..
--
j _ _
t. . _ . ._
f
�,
s
t
�
•�Zt .
F
t.

i
Lxlt
e- S.R.11.2
A.. A
Ft
S.R. 117,
NORTH CAROLINA
LAND RESOURCES INFORMATION SERVICE
l,'63600

:_1
r,
LJ
►'1
A
CHANNEL CALCULATIONS
Channel calculations for the Nello Teer; Northern Orange Quarry
were derived by use of Manning's equation. Flows into the
channels were calculated by the Rational Method.
-._........ W = B + 2MY Where __..
W = top width (ft.)
A = BY + MY2 A = cross sectional area(ft2
WP= wetted perimeter-(ft.)
WP = B + 2Y 1+M2 R = hydraulic radius (ft.)
Q = flow (cfs)
R = A S = channel slope (ft/ft)
WP v = velocity (fps)
Q = 1.486 AR 2/3�rS—
n
v = 1.486 R 2/3 �%S
N
Note: Roughness Coefficient, n, 0.013 for concrete pipes
0.03 _ for channels lined with erosionet and straw
0.06 - for channels lined with established fescue
0.030--0.034- for channels lined with Rip -Rap
I-M
•

N
CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FRE-
QUENCY
(Yr)
FLOW
ACTUAL
(cfs)
TYPE
LINING
WATER
DEPTH
(ft)
SIDE
SLOPES
BOTTOM
WIDTH
(ft)
SLOPE
W
MANNINGS
n
FLOW
(design)
cfs
VELOCITYI
(fps)
A
B
25
2.b
v
Eros i onet-T.
w/straw
5161
3:1
0
3.
0.03
2.8�;
3.6.,
dmax=0.45
A
B
25
2.8
grass
0.66
3:1
0
3.61
0.06
2.811
2.1;7
C
D
25
2.3
U
Erosionet
w/straw
0.50
3:1
0
2.69
0.03
2.33
3.11
dmax=0.55
C
D
25
2.3
grass
0.65
3:1
0
2.69
0.06
2.35
1.85
E
D
25
8.4
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
0.58
3:1
2
2.31
0.03
8.61
3.97
dmax=0.61
E
D
25
8.4
trap.
grass
0.81
3:1
2
2.31
0.06
8.55
2.38
F
G
25
12.5
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
0. 85
3:1
2
1.04
0.03
12.70
3.28
dmax=l.0
1.17
3:1
2
1.04
0.06
12.66
1.96
G
H
25
70.90
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
2.01
3:1
6
0.25
0.03
71.05
2.911
dmax=2.5_
G
H
25
70.90
trap.
rass
2.80
3:1 1
6
0.251
0.06
71.1z`
1.76
Q25-24hr storm will probably not occur before channel stabilizes

al • • 0 0 ® /1 • .0 • •
CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FRE-
QUENCY
(Yr)
FLOW
ACTUAL
(cfs)
TYPE
LINING
WATER
DEPTH
(ft)
SIDE
SLOPES
BOTTOM
WIDTH
(ft)
SLOPE
M
MANNINGS
n
FLOW
(design)
cfs
VELOCITY
(fps)
H
B
25
108.2
trap.Erosionet
/straw
2.20 If
3:1
6
0.40
0.03
108.26
3.91
'dmax=1.90
H
B
25
108.2
trap.
grass
3.06
3:1
6
0.40
0.06
i08.94
2.35
_
a
$
1.5
-.a o
rAs,5
1-19
3,1
a
0.10
0.02S
51. S
2.17

r o
5, 0
Table 3.5b Coefficients for dmilX Fxpmfions far Temporary Channel Lining, "
Type Linins
Coefficients
idORguation 3.23
Velocity Equation
Erodible Soil
Erosion Rtdztant
Sad
'
m
----
n
In
n
(1) Bare Snit
.0030
-.687
.0094
--
V - 22.81 R-191 S.296
`
(2) Fl erglM Roving with Asphalt
0067
.960
.0141
-960
VS 42.45 R'667 S-5
Taa (singly layer)
r
(3) F"berglaw Roving with Asphalt
.0143
-1.01
_027
-1.01
V a 59.20 R-667 S-5
Tacit (double layer)
(4) Iuta Mesh
.0076
-.875
.0202
=883
V -61.53 R1.0285.431
(5) IF-MWvr Mat
.0572
-585
.101
-.585
V -32.29 R1-34DS351
(6) STzaw a £roscnet
.052
.652 f— .082
-.652
V m7D 76 R1.455 S-529 -
(7) Filbemim Mat - 3]8"
.025
--670
.046
_670
V -73.53 R1330 S 51-2
(8) 1=iber bm Mat -1 j2"
048
-.646
.083
:646
V -14.84 R1-235 5.086
(9) Emsonct
.049
- 642
094
-.642
V -41.45 R•955 SAS
Adapted from McWhorter ex al.
(1968).

r1
U
2
0
•
•
-.G:X/SL'.•�y 50, / friesq rj e . R'95 /n.S
He
3
Heie��
H r
0
H e-,,% r
JA r
C
C h
C 1 e a.c. I
Lc� Lic,r,r^
7 J I
G }'1 C c_7 QOfCS=v��1"-Urban
Tr A
S
BY�P—Zj?'1 DATE S S 87 SUBJECT Ne/% Tcer ' iS/ur�C OrA� e Co. SHEET NO. OPT_
CHKD. BY DATE fc c. �� Ss,,Ei,a /io' s JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

J
'
1C un ej 0 14z, 0 7-r Li 5
C'. = U. 30
k = o . so
4, >=«V = 6-(, - -S S (�- yo Ff
a� E l Ev 1110
- LL
-
L
O.
�c = F-z7;k:�L-- `�i3aa}�
_
I
L3 V 5 J L. 3 Vo. o3o8 J
�Zs zc�,zs
T4
= 31.Sf R�r�
C = o. 3�
r
a FLCV. u - s9c. = 30 Ft
L = 7 So jf
�z57 - 4,7 /tip
-0 AG,
k
7� = 30
L 7 ��
4Z5
�izs �0.3 C)c
BY _ _ _DATE -r'87 SUBJECT A)c //o rrs4 o..o CC. SHEET NO. OF
CHKD. BY DATE �J n J %< lc . JOB NO.
rp
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS. P. A_ CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

•
•
•
13as kIf
_ /O5`O Ft
Tom= 19.3rn,
ZLT = S &
A - 10•19 AG
3 7,3 cFs
BA%,'n d S
C = 0.7o
k= 0.17
A El-Fv = CP2o
L = // So Ft
Q S'B,y cf5
Q41,'n
4 Ec.r-v. = 615 - sGy = zy Ft
L = 15,5c) f E
A
. Qz = 12.S CAS
8H '� 1
7 re
L _ Baca {t
T, =
ss
• 425-
BY aP-, DATE S'---P7 SUBJECT Ale//a Z:s -ALta O,SHEET NO. -7 OF
CHKD. BY DATE o{y, c, A J JOB NO.
•
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS. P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

pAsi�
1t o . 2.4
�LFV � 600 SSC -
�. = y so ft
7
Lis = Ca,O rn /A,-
A = O. 1oS mac,
F,
13,sf�-
BY DATE SUBJECT
CHKD. BY DATE
rp
SHEET NO. $ OF
JOB NO.
AAGSOALE CONSULTANTS. P. A. 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS I DESIGN SHEET

•
E
•
r
a,q 15"1 " 1 FIptJS to 7Lrmnnrary <...1.,,..,...f AAA... , .'.fL._ —'.,
e = 0.3o
k= aSo
d EC EV = 6/6 - S!o / - S `/ F�
J
A� /Zz Ac
QLs ` 10 Z-
16 bA`�--^-
C. 0.30
1c= J,So
nr--Lev =
619-5-72 = `U
Le. A, =
T� =
Svv. Vj ryn
�zs
3.o
A - S' 7
Qiy
S! S c{S
BY DA
CHKD. BY DA
SUBJECT
SHEET NO. OF
JOB
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS. P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS i
DESIGN SHEET

n
- RAINFALL INTENSITY -DURATION --FREQUENCY CURVES
CMARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO, NORTw CAROLINA
r, T
:n
.1
.1
uHEMMER
olatimmi
1
s rrsars
w
ivia
~.±uC�`��aaa�raarraa�ia■c
slur
wwZ'w�i
rcaall■laaaiaaa
Mon
�
linfoomonas111111
■/�NSN�
1r!!1■1moll
■
f •0 If fD a W f000 It ) • f f / +0 It r N
" WT1/ .Ou"
MATTERAS,NORTM CAROLINA
I901-If•f
I
�3ir
rl'
"�
r�wt�iraw�iw�
. - - •D .f w .D •a fo as 1 1 . s • ,v ,1 a T•
py.•1rD,r
0.
D.
OI
! IO .] f0 70 .D 1A p 1 3 • 1 / • ,o it n [
■ONNI
4
�
►
s�
urn
arc
�a
rrr�aar
IN
so
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
�-1
I
I i
�• � � i I�
I
I
I
'
RHTT
—1--1
NRCD—Land Quality
FIGURE 2,

ii • i • • • 11 • • • •
PROJECT. N• ors, , e Co .
DESIGNER: �yn
-
DATE: - t, 8
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
1 7 raw -70. S c -F5
STATI ON
Iry Z-3�„�cA; 7L5 35uScFs
EL. 5?L-0
AHOY= '•S
01 = 35 . K 5 nFs T WI = o
—-^-^--- T W 3, ocp
Q2 = T W2 =
c 7
s �8 SD=d: y
EL. Lr
ELseB
01 : DESIGN DISCHARGE , SAY 025
MEAN STREAM VEL0CfTY=
a m CKECK DISCHARGE , SAY 0550 OR QlDD }
MAX. STREAM VEU)CFTY=
CULVERT
HEADWATER
;COMPUTATION
r
DESCRIPTION
0
SIZE
_
�
o
Cos?
COMMENTS
INLET CONT.
OUTLET CONTROL'_
NW=N + hp —LSo
IiW
!4
H
dC
Tw
h4
LSO
HW
(ENTRGNCE TYPE)
'�
3;
G t7.Oc7✓I-`D FNp
�
I
OJilet Ccn.�rul
i?rn� Jn II
]r
3<e
0•qk
2.
O.Z
G3
L �O
us
3 p(a
3.ula
U.3o
3,3°i
"3 3�
ScZ
SUMMARY a RECOMMENDATIONS'
V--(.c
15ztF
�.c) Sr -
A=

•
• - • • • • • • • Ip •
m
PROJECT. ^' o,a P Ca_
DESIGNER:
DATE: - _L'87
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
t I
G{o..� Fro--./ 3As;, s 1 q Z U• Jcr F-Z,j r,lr
Co
STATI ON
EL. Oo
AHw= v 1
�
01 = ` 5-lo c-Fs TW1 = 158( ,00
Q2 = TW2 =
..��� ,_L Tw 2;foa
Sp` o.oay�
5�-- L. = Ess�
J 01 • DESIGN DISCHARGE , SAY 025
MEAN STREAM VELOCITY
02 a CHECK DISCHARGE , SAY 010 DR 0100
l �
MAX. STREAM VELOCITY= __
CULVERT
0E5CFiIPT10N
(ENTRANCE TYPE)
0
SIZE
HEADWATER
;COMPUTATION
¢ _
U
a`
o
i
COST
COMMENTS
INLET CONT
OUTLET
CONTROL
HW=H + ho —LSo
D
HW
Ke
H
dG
dQ+D
Tw
ho
LSD I
HW
'2
GRou�Ei) Enib
In IGt. een 4r01
R PE u/ }lEacaJ.l)
L/
3c�"
0S
3•4S
o.zo
/.3(
Z.2
2.LC
Z.GO
z.roo
0.460
7.3(
SUMMARY Q RECOMMEN77DATIONS:J-
F,FiCA nC-i7 = SO Lp5 -
5—t 10 w-1
ar n s=
4 \
V VZ5= Cf„7S��1,f3) _ % 6,-3 F P 7
vr.a,

'FTGURE 7
•
160
10,000.
168
8,000
EXAMPLE
(3)
6.
156
6,000
0.49 inches, (3.5 fat)
6
)44
5 00a
r
Q. 12o cts
51
4,000
6.
5.
132
0 feet
4,
•
4.
120
(2) 2.1 7.4
2,000
(5) 2.x 7.7
4•—
3•
I08
_-
3.
eD in Net
96
— 1;040
3.
•
Boo
---•
----r
84
600
2'�
2-
500
72
400
3
2.
•
3aa
����
N
1.5
z
0
60
0
200
1.$
z
z
/
uj
-
a
54
��
a
a
a
4 a
/ W
100
/
so
to
/
6 0
It -
1.0
1.0 ...
o
to
50 HW ENTRANCE
- 10
A.
40
0 SCALE TYPE
w
—
36
30
(1) Square edge with
Q
.9
•
33
headwall
A -
—9
Q
20
(2) Qroove and with
a
W
A
30
headwall
T
8
13
(3) Groove end
8
27
projecting
-
10
aA
—
—•7
7-
_
v
d
'
.
6
To use scale (2) or (3) ArojeGf
I
5
harlsontally la scale (f), then
4
use straight inclined line through
p and 0 {Calf{, or reverse as
,6
3
iltustrated.
—.6
.6
18
2
15
.5
.5
.5
•
- 12
HEADWATER DEPTH
FOR
CONCRETE CULVERTS
HEADWATER SCALES z83
.PIPE
REVISED
MAY 1964 WITH
INLET
CONTROL
EJuREAV
OF 1'uRiiC
ROADS JAM- 1963

C�
•
C
r1
L-A
w
u-
u
z
a
w
tK
4
T
u
.w
c
•
-2000
k000
- A00
- 600
- 500
- 400
- 300
-200
10
A
6
5
4
0
x
i
x
a
r
--1zo
-14$
- 9F
- 94
- 72
-66
- 60
- 54
p.4B
- 48 77,
-
-42
36
-33
-30
-27
-24
-2t
-16
-k�
-1z
flUREAU Of PU9LIC ROADS JAN. M63
FIGURE
8 .
-- . f
H
-
Hw
r .
.4
yl Slope So—.
SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLOWING FULL
—
4 Hoy. H. ha-L$a
Far gufiel crown ma) wEmrrgfd. compel. HW by
7
mel hods described in the design procrdure
- 10
k•OqA
w
�
o
i
_� •l�O _ 20�
Q AN
00 <11F�'
Q
- 4
tio°
aoo. Son
- s
50� s
- A
•o
-10
V
20
HEAD FOR
CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.0 12
0

•
a
•
•
•
•
•
•
FTGURE 9
L
0 10 20 1 30 40 50 60 ►0 uu yV iuv
DISCHARGE-Q-CFS
s
6
5
4u 4
q�q
�, 0 I00 200 300 400 500 600. Too nuu yuu iuuu h
DISCHARGE-Q-CFS a
ca 'a
0 1000 FODU Z)uuV �UOQ
DISCHARGE-Q -CFS
• BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
JAN.1964 CRITICAL DEPTH
CIRCULAR PIPE
14
IZ
10
a
6
4

FIGURE 10
•
rp
r.
u
Ii1
+Ili
i11
o
o 100
U
uj 80
60 v'
50
a
i
" 40
u-' 30 i
co 20
Z
U.
z
1 jo
6�
5i
4�
:3
i
\` r 5: 6. ,
4 FT/SEC
6
.3:
01 O2 •03.04.05 y 1 .2 .3 .4.5.6 .a 1 2 3 4 5 6 810
SLOPE OF PIPE IN FEET PER 100 FEET
026
_� 24 -
�22
� 20
>16
\16
14
�12
2i
0

FIGURE II
RELATIVE VELOCITY AND FLOW IN
CIRCULAR'PIPE FOR ANY DEPTH of FLOW
i
LL
1 { ; L4-j
CL4\ C3 1
cs
�7-
• - 1 , _, o
k
o
N
Lf)• � i ..I i
ri
rti Q O 0 C? O ci O Q Q
M01i JO Hld3❑

Deo•,e 5;2e aned
'for Ce .qp1-0,15
Uu��et c f 3lo r /oPe under
Rc A,
� �eCP�£ia
VE/oc y - 7.35
7)
lPr9n, /Pny C� ' %
J
J
5/Zr
Y 9
� 5�•r 9J
Se. CIAss Q R,' rZ,
ae /Z /q
Pr tl,,ck.,ess
/ill es
�o.n N
undet nra�I took �.�
vc c".Ty = E,7Z rpS
zQnC
�7�5GrL 7)
•
%a/7.un �Q .ly�h W X DO
J
J
l{is�ic 8�
bo = �o XlL3 for n�,./�,P/.
::�iv�.i
/
S - S SC /.25` _ ?•7r
e
USC C �q5S A IZ,D SAP
Z Ayer
t � ZZ,SU Ti /0n, An: L=n
emP r,e_ncI) sP�IlwA. - " p e o Q I lel
Zane Z �>�fu�+re 7)
f7 /.ZST
5
use Ci4ss n R,p - R,,p CF 2" lv'r
BY DATE SUBJECT -ello 7eAr -"J. 11—. <' SHEET NO.' 17 OF
CHKD. BY DATE _ �'p �?._o tv �� _ �! �^ s JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS. P. A. I CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

al
-r.
G.
Scone Sizes For
ESTIMATION OF STONE SIZE tND DIMENSIONS FOR
CULVERT APRONS
Step 1) Estimate flow velocity Vo at culvert or paved channel
outlet.
Step ii) For pipe culverts Do is diamet:r.
For pipe arch, arch, and box r.ilverts, and paved chan-
nel outlets, 0, a Ae, where A, - cross sectional area
of flow at outlet.
For multiple culverts, use Do 1.25 x Do of single
culvert.
Itep M ) For apron nr4des of 10% or stt•�per, use recommenda-
ti 01: ' higher zone (zcies 1 through 6).
■oar,
N.H.
3::ii.::::.•�..w.
w.
o- �.. ,, 4o I's
o M
Ar'RON NATCRtAL
Q '_Stone Filnng tFinel
_ (Heavy 1-..._
SPil, sfudyrequired (olee
basin. or iorOCr size slnne
so 26
FIGURE 7
Lam4tTI{ 6'
APRO N
TO PROTCCT.
TO K<VENT
CULVERT
SCOUR HOLE
FIGURE
Li
L
IL.PQ��-._4.r
OD
3 R Da l
6 .:,a
4 x QG^8
_
x Oo_
4[0
- BR`3
S x Oa
_10
a�[ay +porors, tfillinQ
Source: "Bank and Channel tininy Proceclres," New Y,),t; Oupartment
r'f '?'.:n•.p0rt0ti0n, PiviJon of Oesign inc
• 11 �
ICulvert Aprons
60•
• • •
Determination of Stone Sizes for Dumped Stone Channel Linings.
and Revetments
Step Use g to determine maximum stone size e.g., or
12 fps - 20" or 550 lbs.).
Step 1i) Use Fig.l1}to determine acceptable size range for stone
(for 12 fps it is 125-500 lbs. for 75% of stone, and the
maximum and minimum range in weight should be 25-500 lbs.)
Note: In determining channel velocities for stone linings and
revetments, use the following coefficients of roughness:
Diameter hanning's Min. Thickness
Snches T 'n' of Lining inches��
Fine '3 0.031 9
Light 6- 0.035 12
Medium 13 0.040 18
•ate . �
1
■. •• •
• a» .�•
23
0••
;{ :•
•r:
r
•
:::::a•:
•:/
/•wp
:
�• ,�a•
J
w=�i
}.•Lfi::.••:•+�•-•ifi:i:::!•••:Z:1•i
r
•.ir=t'::
.A:i6.'Ci'a:::i
+_:/
»�:• .
••
E!°�r:=:7:n•i:ss-:::#1�Ri:iii
r■
Y ara■a■
iia/\
w-iaarr•■
�'�'�••��.�j•::a;/n
�. a/La±ia
=ur/
r::/.i
rw
'
L rr
• :
a/a•
:a
.WHaru.
:••
�•� ii
• •[t�:=-i
!i-
r•fi•�--r
»
i ••.i::i:ri::i�:•ai
•'S:a:■i
r:•wlina101-R��
=
:W".��:�i1
—16,0a9-
-r0.000
-6.000
r
_ c
•
:1,000
-500 -
-250
r00
-so
o:
0 i
6 i 10 12 14
16 is 20
FIGURE
9Max. Stone Size
Vrta[I rz in realises.
For Rip Rap 60„4
on 1404,% .r,
Maximum weight of
Minimum and maximum range
Weight range of
stone required
io wpi7ht of stones
75% of stones
(lbs.)
O bs.)
;lbs.)
150
25 - 150
.50 - 150
200
25 - 200
50 - 200
250
25 - 250
50 - 250
400
25 - 400
100 - 400
600
25 - 600
150 - 600
800
25 - 800
200 - 800 "
1,000
S0--1,0o0
250 - 1,000
1,300
50 - 1,300
325 - 1,300
1,600
50 - 1,600
400 - 1,600
.7.000
71, - ?'000
6n0 - 2,000
?,100
100 - 7 , 7D0
eoO - 2, 71)n
FIGURE J0--1er::.ior1 Of R111 Rdp

Gass
Rook-
sl
A?ve- �
J
T- PL.1
Pia
L
SD/bs
L
/7
0 - 4o
I3-
%1
�
;�
.
r
'
rj--/oo
ion
lo -3 s
1
3
0- r'
/I>7 f' 3 •f C'. er- 4.7r//'lY . r / C� %7 tic! �/�=% � Z f�
•r/rCt'� /VC

•
r,
u
i
D A rn S j' IW-A -
F/ow `A/-O- � S�P IL./�1/s : _ �70 /(ino�T /-0, URS,�s l� U
cFs 4 8• Lf -fs f- /o• 3 cfs +- 37,3 . Fs
-F-5 tlZ.•S cF5 + 2. 4j ifs +Z.3 i-Fy
SO cfS
Pr✓a
•
f 6,
(00" c,i„a. (-np sr /3B c w/ z.0� A{,{eqJ ��i5. (e-27)
•
•
•
rl
L J
E melt, )-0e) S I WA•
/G 9, S e{S — /34, cAs = 33,E e Cs re 901.1J
"V rl,,j �c r}
G h PmPr� P�C4
s'P ,//LjA y, s
Ttl Fq1,4ifc vt`,c�lAr tr f,c CAL G{-o5s «A✓v ) I s4,)1�
RC,P @ 1. 1/ a/o gr-Ade Ta{ / A-,5/f /o[� GF
c R,Fs-r e+ ev. -8 8
ima. •. SO. //�./w.i -..- -._ ^--'^ �T_ EMfri G E..�cY 5?1cL�...1i7%''
4z"
-=Cn�D�T
' NoTE; s��}y, Ilw11 R�'�v�Ps.gh �5"/ �S rn"Z S, � G -L % f^e•.-} Ciyic�P for Sec.�iw�e�L Co��ro � nn
BY ^DATE_ 5 = -07 SUBJECT ZE&l1iZ_ _ s'/ /UwfG or a ,n M SHEET NO. Z`' OF
CHKD. BY DATE JOB NO.
•
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. I CONSULTING ENGINEERS I DESIGN SHEET

r�
u
• 1
,e.;,.�,J,
cl� Si n
/ [J y-G. � {� �✓ � o Srr� rwe e,� � .6 r+5 / 7 � �d Z - 4a c �S .
8 C-f @ H-
y8 Grp . 0-1 p W"// F/o.') 7(o c�'s (,-Z�
• r em
/Q Z. Cn Cis — 7{D cF5 Z�. Co CFS rcyd.rPJ �o F�ou1 lifro.x% Crr�s�yry
%4 / 2 fE w ,fie Ce "e� j ell e 5 Pr%/us.a'r c.J� 3 : j s .�P s /��� • S w. /�
?' o-A,1 -?o cfs c�,f� n SfsSe eS/��of
IW a'j C-x:t .5eciro,, of //-z )
r
76 cfS t 3O c,rS
MA.)( . 'WArEk C--LEV. 572, ly
CrPSF V73,Z
1.4 _ �.,er en sp,ll J9y clw. 5�1. �3
o l ELr� � )o �5'Si � y8 ✓R.Se(
WPM
GSLK .3(9" crnlp �'\ ra.8a%
F1.Ev. 57,',',5"�
.. !rip of ZSer C-le,,. - S�v.� <I f G.o = $`7o..,!�3'r
S-AIIAiJ�� a/eSitti i/5,wreJ 6-Z-7. 6P-Z7 x4,k/ Gved£ taf St�,.,<nf Cenro/
On ConJ/ice row Sr�cs c/So^ - 5c5 ,
BY ! �/2 DATE /2-/7-af 7� SUBJECT SHEET NO. OF
_ CHKD. BY DATE 9-g e _ CvU . �2,-AeT ^, _ JOB NO,
r / r,
J�rl4i'.�T t5.45R•, %—r5r�1
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS. P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

Side slopes - 3 Horiz, to 1 Vert.
Discharge
Q
CPS
Slope
Range
Bottom
width
Feet
Stage
FGet
I
Discharge
Q
CPS
Slope
Range
Bottom
width
Feet
Stage
Feet
Minimum
Percent
maximum
IPercenti
iaimum
Percent
Maximum
Percent
15
3.3
12.2
8'
83
80
2.6
5.2
24
1.24
3.5
16.2
12
.69
2.8
.3.9
26
1.14
20
3.1
e.9
8
.97
2.9
7.0
32
1.00
3.2
13.0
12
.81
90
2.5
2.0
12
1.84
3.3
17.3
16
.70
2.5
3.1
18
1.61
25
2.9
7.1
8
1.09
2.0
3.8
20'
1.45
3.2
9.9.
22
.91
2.7
4.5
24
1.32
3.3
13.2
18
..79
2.8
5.3
26
1.22
3.3
17.2
20
.70
2.8
8.1
32
1.14
30
2.9
6.0
8
1.20
100
2.5
2.8
16
1.71
3.0
8.2
12
1.01
2.6
3.3
20
1. 4
3.0
10.7
16
.88
2.6
4.0
24
1.41
3.3
13.8
20
.78
2.7
4.8
28
1:30
35
2.8
5.1
n
1.30
2.:r
5.3
32
i.2Y
2.8
8.9
12
1.10
2.8
6.1
36
1.13
3.1
9.0
16
.94
120
2.5
2.8
20
1.71
3.Y
11.3
20
.85
2.6
3.2
24
1.58
3.2
14.1
24
.77
2.
40
2.7
4.5
8
1.40
2.7
4.2'
32
1.34
2.9
6.0
12
1.18
2.7
4.8
38
1 1.26
2.9
7.6
18
1.03
140
2.5
2.7
24
1.71
3.1
9.7
20
.91
2.0
3.2
28
1.58
3.1
11.9
24.
.83
2. F
3.8
32
1.47
45
2.6
4.1
a
1.49
2.6
4.0
36
1.36
2.8
5.3
12
1.25
2.7
4.5
40
1.30
2.9
6.7
18
1.09
160
2.5
2.7
2-8
1.7
3.0
8.4
20
.98
2.5
3.1
32
1.56
3.0
10.4
24-
.89
2.
3.4
36.
1.9
50
2.7
3.7
8
1.57
2.03
1.4
2.B
4.7
.12
1.33
2.7
4.3
44
1.33
2.8
8.0
181
1.18
SBO
2.4
2.7
32
1.72
2.9
7.3
20
1.03
2.4
36
1.60
3.1
.9.0
24
.94
2.5
3.4
40
1.51
80
2.6-3.1
8
1.73
44
1.43
2.7
3.9
12
1.47
200
2.5
2.7
36
1.70 '
4.8.
1
1.28
2.5
2.
40
1.80
�2.9
5.9
20
1.15
3.3
44
1.52
7.3
24.
1.05
2.9
3.6
48
3.0
8.6•
28
.97
220
2.4
2.6
40
1.70
70
2.5
..2.8
8
1.68
2.5
2.9
44
1.61
a..i
12
Y. 60
L. 5
3. L
46
L. a '3
2.45
4.1
16
1.40
240
2.5
2.6
44
1.70
2.7
5.0
20
1.26
2.5
2.9
48
1.62
2.8
8.1
24
1.15
2.
3.2
52
-
.2.9
7.0
28
1.05
2�
2.4
2.6
48
1.70
80
_2.5
2.9
12
1.72'
2.5
2-9
52
1.62
2.8
3.8
16
1.51
280
2.4
2.6
52
1.70
2.7 1
4.
20 1
1.33
300
2.5
1 2.e
56
1.89
LsamyyC ui use
Given: Discharge, Q=87 c.f.s. Spillway Slope, Exit section (from profile)=
4%.
Find: Bottom Width and Stage in Reservoir.
Procedure: Enter table from left'st 90 c.f.s. Note that spillway slope (4%)
falls within slope ranges corresponding to bottom widths of 24, 28,
and 32 feet. Use narrower bottom width, 24 feet, to minimize
meandering. Stage in Reservoir will be 1.32 feet.
Note: Computations based on: Roughness coefficient, n=.040.
Maximum velocity=5.50 ft. per sec.
Exhibit 11-2 Design table for vegetated spillways excavated in erosion
resistant soils.
4_204e7 Rev. 12-60
A•-2.4
- 2eaQ

L
L
PIPE FLOW CHART (Full flow assumed)
For Corrugated Metal Pipe Inlet Ke + N - 1.0 and 70 feet of Corrugated Metal Pipe Conduit
n K 0.025. Note correction factors for other pipe lengths. IL
ia.
H
12"
15"
16"
21"
24"
30"
36"
42"
2
2.84
4.92
7.73
11.30
15.60
26.60
40.77
58.12
3
3.48
6:03
9.47
13.84
19.10
32.58
49.93
71.19
4
4.02
6.96
10.94
15.98
22.06
37.62
57.66'
82.20
5
4.49
7.78
12.23
17.87
24.66
42.06
64.46
91.90
6
4.92
8.52
13.40
19.57
27.01
46.07
70.60
100.65
7
5.32
9.21
14.47
21.14
29.19
49.77
76.28
108.75
8
5.68
9.84
15.47
22.60
31.19
53.19
61.53
116.23
9
6.03
10.44
16.41
23.97
33.09
56.43
86.49
123.30
10
6.34
11.00
17.30
25.26
34.88
59.48
91.16
129.96
11
6.67
11.54
18.14
26.50
36.59
62.39
95.63
136.33
12
6.96
12.05
18.95
27.68
38.21
65.16
99.87
142.37
13
7,25
12.55
19.72
20.81
3,.'7
67.63
103.96
140.Ll
14
7.52
13.02
20.47
29,90
41,27
70.39
107.88
153.80
15
7.70
13.48
'21.19
30.95
42.72
72.85
111.66
159.18
16
8.04
13.92
21.66
31.96
44.12
75.24
115.32
164.40
17
8.29
14.35
22.55
32.94
45.48_
77.55
118.87
169.46
18
8.53
14.77
23.21
33.90
46.80
79.81
122.33
174.39
19
8.76
15.17
23.84
34.83
48.08
81.99
125.67
179.15
20
8.99
15.56
24.46
35.73
49.33
84.12
128.93
163.80
21
9.21
15.95
25.07
36.62
50.55
86.21
132.13
188,36
22
9.43
16.32
25.65
37.47
51.73
88.22
135.21
192.76
23
9.64
16.69
26.23
36.32
52.90
90.21
138.27
197.12
24
9.85
17.05
26.00
39.14
54.04
92.15
141.24
201.35
25
10.05
17.40
27.35
39.95
55.15
94.05
144.15
205.50
L
Correction Factors For Other Pipe Lengths
40
1.23
1.22
1.20
1.19
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.11
50
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.10
1.09
1.08
1.07
60
1.07
1.06
1.06
1.05
1.05
1.04
1.04
1.03
70
1.00
1.00
1:0o
1.00
1,00
1.00
1.00
1.00
80
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.97
0.97
90
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.94
100.
0.86
0.87 1
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.90
0.91
0.92
Figure 6-25 Pipe flow chart for corrugated
metal pipe drop inlet spillway
A-1.4

S
pl .. 'rn.-a'de-y Co;llw'L'Y
PROJECT.
+
DESIGNER:
I
DATE:
-
HYDROLOGIC AND
CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
�.,,•.�r,�y
PT i-I ` 33.5-
33"sWi =
_ S. �g � {s
EL. 588
STATION :
Sp'!/� • ---
01 = b'. 38
T WI =
AHW=�_
.
-�-��
TW
2
2 —
EL
se
L
EL
01 • DESIGN DISCHARGE , SAY D!3 l
MEAN STREAM
VELOCITY=
_02: CHICK DISCHARGE , !SAY Qso DR OIIDO 1
MAX. STREAM VELOCITY=
CULVERT
DESCRIPTION
(ENTRANCE TYPE)
p
s�zE
HEADWATER ;COMPUTATION
x
g =
$
o
cost
COMMENTS
INLET CONT.
OUTLET
CONTROL
HW= H + ho --LSD
HD
HW
Kt
H
dt
d�
TW
hD
L50
HW
/kaoA 7g11
$.38
��/
0•13
/.o
1,5-
/.s'
l.11
I.S'
/yc,
G.IL
S'l/-e� C.,f.�,
ti11�. —1
I
GVC eO
.
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS; XhrAA// RP _��� C /vr��
�o rt.l�c� vctcc.{ �•Fo�r {�o�� fA�s
}' t` �aw,y.•c./ A,.
�/o.o.� @ f/er° �{ Z`/�
AU .n s C' ,-✓wy
•.. .. 0 0 •< . .... 411,- 0 WN�.. • - .0. ... • 0 . - I*

•
Vd/��
GJ4�rr F,c�cn Cii., �unwt
Q. S
q<,e -inch �r C%,S ,e /ACc A,, S�otl Sz.
. 19.2
a�,s{,,.6r� �cre.S ,ncl�r�"lJ
s {ackp;(Q � �l.�„E
, 4..�1 .s•(��� Al'��s.
J
Aetc �ne� �: f✓.ter
q c r C - r n c i, j / `� 3 5 o S F \ r/
�j o \ _
jr 5/£! 5`•
J � acre � l
l�Ic:l, y J
S�o�Afe
mk
mr
S$h
s`g2
S ubo
Ar- rC �u .c� 5 to b� ConS4Pr-"or o ari ot� er Ur Qrc C:0✓15.
s�ALE
hrcj aJ ,s SsU ft G -0,4.,.,
?b}cf AJ4l;f-6ly VC) ,aen{ tCOrA)C' =
?`i 7(aa ISP
3c)Ll ;-j
z J
• = 4�(Dj000 CF > 3Y8%6 CF VEw Pon/Z w,1(
AMPLE 5EDu"ISipRA, <. e
BY DATE r' 7 - 8 "7 SUBJECT lJ[ ___T c^r - ti, 0—,� P Cfo, SHEET NO. Z Y. OF
CHKD. BY DATE_ S'r%•Me^ or JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

J�Pc/ Ui�[�
S[U .n•. rn •C ✓��Vrv�<°.
�ror.1 m,nirlq
_� furry
• �S Fj CrC /n[�
�L(' .Gi'.f {vr6PN fJc rC
+%'[�UiKd /O!
flo/Ry�
r-.[��S
eQMp') c.'/ Scc_P•�*tr...f �A�/r� (Ig6z/ n7i•ni�� Af'rc.)
• 64.y �c� D•Sace-i���1] 4/_75-ls6 SF 0.0$ {f _ 33� BOZ..S�CF reyu rL�
flcrP/ 13crQ- .+
e�
w
elo S F-
S� C'eo7S SEc-nc j long
113 5 F
. s.s head of pow(
To+al QVAII►,61e 5�c.1;,,..c,J� S�orA�e = (�IOt �+31roo + II {o� I<U_
5'�GZS .oca CF ,4�,y�ti rA.
BY DATE SUBJECT SHEET NO. OF
CHKD. BY DATE JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC AND GROUND WATER STUDY

ATLANTIC GEOTECH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Geologists, Hydrologists & Environmental Scientists
June 15, 1987
Mr. Mi ke Gi bbons
Ragsdale Consultants, P.A.
4020 Westchase Boulevard, Suite 360
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Gibbons:
Attached is the report called for in our proposal dated May 18, 1987.
If you have any questions please contact P. M. Brown at 787-0375.
Sincerely,
Philip M. Brown
Consulting Geologist
P.O. Box 32093, Ralcigh, North Carolina 27622 Telephone [phone]

Ground -dater Conditions, Nello L. Teer Company
Proposed North Durham Quarry,
Durham and Orange Counties, North Carolina

Ground -Water Conditions, Nelio L. Teer Company
Proposed North Durham Quarry,
Durham and Orange Counties, North Carolina
For
Ragsdale Consultants, P.A.
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared By
Atlantic Geotech Associates, Inc.
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 1987

Introduction
The general ground -water conditions recognized, or projected, at and in
the vicinity of the proposed quarry site are described herein. Also, the
report addresses the specific questions that pertain to ground water and
which are found in the "Application for North Carolina Mining Permit"
p. 10, as follows:
"What is the depth to the ground -water table? If the mine excavation
extends below the water table, how will mine dewatering impact neighboring
wells? Locate any wells on the mine map that exist within [500] feet of
the permit area if the mine excavation will extend below the ground -"water
table."
-DR

Location and Description of Area
•
The property that incorporates the proposed quarry site lies athwart
the Durham -Orange County boundary in a general area that lies northwest
of the Town of Rougemont, Durham County, and east of the site of the
Orange County Speedway. The quarry property is circumscribed by road segments
belonging to NC 57, SR 1471, SR 1472, SR 1473 and SR 1533 (see Fig. 1).
In general, the property is located along a drainage divide between Buffalo
Creek, to the south, and severa'1 tributaries to the Flat River, to the
north.
At and in the vicinity of the proposed quarry, the terrane is rolling
to weakly dissected. Elevations in the area range from about 620 to 550
feet above mean sea level datum. Between adjacent highs and lows, the average
relief appears to be less than 20 feet but a maximum relief of 60 to 70
feet may occur locally.
-2-

General Geology
The proposed quarry lies in a northeast trending belt of rocks known
as the Carolina Slate Belt. In the vicinity of the quarry, the rocks are
felsic and intermediate metavolcanics, chiefly metamorphosed flows and tuffs
of Cambrian age (570-500 million years old), and metamorphosed igneous
intrusives. According to information furnished by the client, the source
rock in the pit area is '`quartz diorite and intermediate metavolcanics"
i.r + r +w �a ,i err r . :} Junction :+L. c. n 4
V'7C]L oI LrrC quarry and along ICI 5 at rL> ;Urll,Llo11 wlLri aawyer nvau,
a highly -sheared sericitic phyllite is prominent in outcrop. In several
traverses across the eastern segment of the quarry property, tuffaceous
argillite was present, locally, as boulders and cobbles.
Weathering in the area of the proposed quarry does not appear to
extend to a significant depth (in excess of ±20 feet). Scattered boulders
and cobbles of fresh rock occur ubiquitously on the surface throughout
the area. Unless cored sections should prove otherwise, the depth of dug
wells suggests that unweathered rock occurs at a depth of no more than
20 feet below land surface throughout the area.
Faults, joints, fractures, fissures and microfissures are common
discontinuities found in crystalline rocks. They provide space for the
storage of ground water and avenues for its movement. Fracture intensity,
defined as the average number of fractures intersected per linear meter,
was not determined because of the reconnaissance nature of the investigation.
However, from observation, fracture intensity appears relatively high
and thus indicates a brittle response to stress. Most of the fractures
observed are high angled and many were sealed thus lowering the hydrologic
capacity of the rock. Evenly -spaced fractures are present as well as those
- 3-
i

that are clustered and are randomly positioned. Three fracture sets appear
dominant. Two sets are orthogonal and strike NE:any, respectively.
A—thi.r_d_set_str-i_kes--N_and_bisecis the angle formed by the_ortho.gonal_sets.
No time was spent in determining the genetic nature of the fractures seen
in the field.
-4-

Ground Water
In the proposed quarry area, the value of igneous and metamorphic
rocks as aquifers depends upon the thickness and nature of the weathered
zone and the presence of interconnected openings or voids -in the rock.- In
general, the openings disappear with depth and are not significant below
depths of several hundred to a thousand feet. As in the proposed quarry area,
most igneous and metamorphic rocks in the Piedmont Province are unconfined
aquifers, that is they are not overlain by confining layers. Such aquifers
are often referred to as free or "water -table" aquifers. Precipitation,
chiefly rainfall, infiltrates the zone of weathered rock, percolates downward
through air -filled interstices above the saturated zone and joins the ground-
water body. The water table is the upper surface of the saturated ground-
water body. The position (depth) of the water table with respect to the
overlying land surface is dynamic, not static. It moves constantly with
respect to time. In general and with reference to land surface datum, the
water level is relatively near i the surface (high) during periods of abundant
rainfall and relatively deeper (low) during periods of drought. The
topography of the water table represents a subdued image of the overlying
topography of the land surface at any given time (water is closer to the
surface in the valleys than onithe hills).
In June of 1987, a rA connai�,sa�.e_ investigation of ground -water conditions
in the area of the proposed quarry was undertaken. Using information on
well locations furnished by the client, well sites were visited and well
depths and water levels (depth of the water table) were measured. Also,
owners and tenants were queriedi with respect to yields and well performance
and adequacy over time, etc.
i
-5-

Dug wells ranged from 17 to 23 feet deep. Water levels ranged from
7.9 to 17.2 feet below land surface. In these wells the elevation of the
water table ranged from 605 to 575 feet above mean sea level. During tle
same time frame, water levels also were measured in three of the client's
boreholes(RPDD #2, 3 and 4). In the three boreholes, the water levels
ranged from 12.8 to 5.1 feat below land surface and the elevation of the
water table from 596 to 568 feet above mean sea level. In the area covered
by the reconnaissance investigation, the depth to the ground -water table
ranged from 5.1 to 17.9 feet below land surface and 605 to 568 feet above
mean sea level in June 1987.
From discussions with land owners and tenants in the area, it appears
that ground -water supplies from either dug, bored or drilled wells are barely
adequate for most domestic purposes. At several locations, it was necessary
to drill as many as 3 or 4 deep wells (->250 feet) before enough water was
obtained to meet even modest needs. These conditions indicate that there
is no network of interconnected fractures in the unconfined aquifer .or -if
suc,. f " ctures are present they are sealed and do not provide avenues for
,ra
ground-water movement. The unconfined aquifer appears to have relatively
low fracture permeability in the area of the proposed quarry. Therefore, /
any ground -water pumpage in the pit area probably would not significantly ✓
affect the position of the water table at points distant from the pit.
However, because of the possibility of interconnected fractures being present
in the subsurface, and because mining activity may be wrongly credited with
ground -water problems outside of the area, it would be prudent to monitor
the effects of quarry operations on ground water in the vicinity of the pit.
Taking advantage of wells already dug or boreholes drilled on quarry property.
it is recommended that at six sites, labeled 0-I to 0-6 on the mine property
-6-

map, observation wells be established.
Upon complete abandonment of the premises adjacent to several of the
wells, it is recommended that water levels be measured and recorded at all
six sites on a weekly basis for one year and, thereafter, on a monthly basis
as may be considered necessary following interpretation of records
collected for the first year. Photographs of the six wells or boreholes
are shown on Figure 2.
In response to the requirement for providing answers to questions
concerning ground water in the "Application for a Mining Permit [p. 9,
item 10], the following response is suggested:
The depth to the ground -water table ranges from 5.1 to 17.9 feet below
land surface [June 19871 and the elevation of the water table ranges from.
568 to 605 feet above mean sea level datum. The ground -water study of the
proposed quarry site indicates that neighboring wells will not be impacted
if the mine excavation extends below the water table because of the probability
of extremely low fracture permeability of rocks in and adjacent to the
quarry site.
As part of the reconnaissance investigation, well records in both
federal and state offices that deal with ground -water were examined for
information about wells located in proximity to the proposed quarry site.
These data are contained in the attached Appendix and were considered in
making the statements and interpretations expressed in this report.
-7-

Air 1 / 1�>
l ,`J � ._ I;�`�6s�✓rl�n `�� Jl%I \J ������/\``\,)tif �� �r-.'J'�% / / �� •
�,``l - �� ,f `� " .ram» ' ;, �— �� '�—%' ��� ` •, ' ` �� f`_`-�
1
Na�c�:
op
I,
aNd
ts
rr
- �.., � �f L �� it � _ � - , � - �._ � �,>�> � r •J
��" j 1 VFR�
�t -� r, � fly / � ?� ( 1 �� .•� f �� \ - � ����� 3

1 1
17
yr 1 \ -77 _ = ' , ----/
;_.�p'�-sue �_ I•'i � \��!` �� - � -- � r': `' s` r o
HA
r
I Ss� IDS;
���� / ,:/;' ••` �•— .- .;.ram. !� __ `_ Il= \ � _L J - C � �..
LD
4-1
41
IN
CT
n• U
a, V
=f `�
;� . -tip " f'�` `1���'� .� � �" •- ' �� � —•�—^ ��' .
LOP
V I�i�J 1 f J �4 YS•I��

�J' - -'.� O\\ � � \.� � �O _�` }/J � \..sso •�' 1�✓� '"b'��_" � \r ..��Fr �b`N `- D
ON
HA Ej
7-7
At. . / I � •, 1 3 ` � �' j i �lr� -ram rr- �''�c'„��.� _ a-�1 � � I
K V,
25
`V-'`�� 1. � '! :1" ♦ \� �i 11(, [ t 3

;.\t \ I
(.%y. r ✓yt` 1 r /�=V( —��I Imo:,' -ZrV
D UT
(` -� - \� I I �`� ` ` \• m C
� .1, 1. �'• � t,� S3M _- - Ire �_ y—/r�
„
G1 m,\
4IN1I
��� ;! I (�:, � �=;\\;-ll�,�` j '<1''- i 11 \ ,\ �-\ , a `.1 ��ti_-j \ j)1� `j�� � � 1,//� /' `\l `• a � i� {
•f � � �' V �1.�_C-_ =�0 � I //f/v ,.[� /%I �J�11 �I1 � �� i./e�'J`](}� ��.,\•—�i 11 �/r'N,11-.���`s =';C 11,� �� �

V�iv"r=TL-vi'i L-91§%AIIML-6-Qv ii:vvQr-vWIr% I L.W
RERORT
TO Nello Teer Company
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Attn. Mr. S. Edgeton
OATE September 9, 1987
SUBJECT Proposed Vibration Monitoring Program
New Quarry Operation
Orange County, North Carolina
COPY NUMBER 1 OF 2

0
704-568-,5561
TOLL FREE USA 800-233•6181
vibra•tech engineers incorporated
CONSULTANTS TO THE MINING, QUARRYING, CONSTRUCTION AND EXPLOSIVE USING INDUSTRIES
7328 C PEBBLESTONE DR., CHARLOTTE, INC 28212
September 9, 1987
Mr. Steve Edgeton
Nello Teer Company
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Dear Mr. Edgeton,
This proposal documents the items that Vibra-Tech Engineers recommends to
minimize the effects of blasting on the adjacent community. The steps outlined in
this proposal have been effective in assisting new operations develop a good working
relationship with their neighbors.
As a present client of Vibra--Tech Engineers, your company has a reputation
for using all possible means to minimize the impact of operations on nearby
residents. the following proposal should assist you in your planned expansion.
We at Vibra-Tech%Charlotte are looking forward to a continued and expanded
role in assisting Nello Teer. Please do not hesitate to contact us whenever we
can be of service.
Best wishes,
Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc.
Stuart C. Brashear
Regional Manager

vibra-tech
PROPOSED VIBRATION MONITORING PROGRAM
NELLO TEER COMPANY
I. PRE -BLAST SURVEYS
Prior to the commencement of blasting operations at the proposed Nello Teer
operation, pre -blast surveys of all nearby structures will be performed. The
purpose of the survey is to document the existing condition of structures
located in the area subject to blasting effects.
The pre -blast survey consists of an internal and external inspection of the
structures in question. All existing flaws, cosmetic cracks and settlement
cracks are photographed and their location is noted on the verbal portion of
the survey. The verbal section is recorded on tape cassettes to insure
proper storage of the data.
In many instances the pre -blast survey brings minor cracking to the attention
of the homeowner. Many times these cosmetic defects go unnoticed until the
commencement of blasting results in homeowners taking a close look at their
homes. The pre -blast survey eliminates many questions regarding flaws that
existed prior to blasting.
It is important to realize that all structures, due to environmental changes
and houshold activity, will form cracks and minor defects throughout the
lifetime of the structure. In a fixed location blasting operation such as a
quarry, it will only be a matter of time before existing cracks propagate, and
new cracks form.
To protect an-oinst 'arran ted .damaoe claims n carnnri incnarfinn rmi1fi hA-
made after several blasts have been initiated. This allows the effects of
blasting to be documented while eliminating the effects of environment. As
an option to the second inspection, a waiver should be included in any pre -
blast survey agreement to take into account environmental impact on structures.

vibra-tech
lI. VIBRAMAP COMPUTER MODELING PROGRAM
The effects of geology on blast vibration has been well documented. As it is
critical to minimize vibration effects from the onset of blasting, a VIBRAMAP
study will be performed to determine optimum delay intervals for production
blasting.
The VIBRAMAP system was developed under contract with the U.S Bureau of Mines
as a method of lowering vibration levels in site specific areas by changing
the delay interval used for production blasts.
The VIBRAMAP is performed by drilling and loading a single column shot. The
single hole shot is drilled at the same depth and burden as that expected for
production blasts. The column is then loaded again in the same manner as
that of a production shot.
Several seismic monitors are deployed near close structures or expected
critical areas. The waveform generated by the detonation of the single column
is recorded by the seismic units for computer analysis.
The waveform recorded by the seismic units is then used by the computer to
create a more complex waveform that would be generated by a full production
blast. The computer can perform this by overlaying the orginal waveform at
the proper time spacing. The computer then analyzes the synthetic vibration
signature for frequency content. By running this program over and over,
adjusting the delay between overlays of the original waveform to simulate
different between hole and between row delays, the computer can sort out and
recommend a particular delay interval that will minimize vibration.
In essence, the VIBRAMAP performs dozens of trial and error blasts for varying
delays without the quarry having to actually load and shoot all the possible
combinations. The computer recommended delays will be recommended to Nello
Teer to be used from the first blast on.
As normal analysis of blast records includes frequency analysis, should any
increase in low frequency energy or overall amplitude of the vibration occur,
Vibra-Tech will inform Nello Teer and recommend an additional VIBRAMAP study
for the new geology in the area then being blasted.

vibra-tech
III. INITIAL MONITORING OF BLASTING OPERATIONS
In order to provide comprehensive coverage of the initial phase of blasting,
Vibra-Tech Engineers will provide personnel and seismic monitors to record
blast vibrations in several locations. By monitoring initial blasts in many
locations, possible complaints can be more easily reviewed and analyzed to
determine the cause, if any, of the complaints.
In addition, monitoring in several locations will assist in building a data
base for blast vibration effects immediately. This procedure is recommended,
depending on the frequency of blasting activity, for a three to six month
period.
As an additonal service, Vibra-Tech will also provide videotape recording of
all blasts. Review of video records can assist in determining proper delay
firing times as well as document flyrock situations. These videotapes will
become the property of Nello Teer.
Ater the monitoring of initial blasting has concluded, it is recommended that
Vibra-Tech periodically (3-4 blasts annually) deploy the full array of seismic
monitors. This is purely a precautionary measure aimed at pinpointing
potential problem areas before they become an issue.

vibra-tech
IV. Monitoring of production blasts will be regularly carried out by Nello Teer.
It is recommended that all blasts be monitored for vibration and air blast
effects. All blast effects are recorded and stored by the seismic monitor For
computer assisted analysis by Vibra-Tech. The computer analysis will show
particle velocities for each component, air blast levels, frequency content of
each component, and damage probability calculations.
The seismic unit to be provided to Nello Teer will be calibrated annually by
Vibra-Tech. In addition, each unit has an internal calibration circuit to
insure accurate measurement of blast effects.
Records of blast events will be presented to Nello Teer in formal reports. A
copy will remain in the possession of Vibra-Tech to insure availability at
any future date.

Pro
RELATED SERVICES -wit h..Y.1 13 H8-
�A
h" hr'-
on-661 in the fields of Erigiqpf�r !c
nomograph Mth' o0tiona Peak Mbijito
VIBRAJECH;��wit . personnel I 3'-c'6mponent ,
,.ing
on iq.enS1_r','__"
immediate 6,f.' vibrati t
-Seis'rfipIogy,­G6oIogy,. and Geop'"K dia e approxima ii
Geophysics offers profe'ssion"J.'o
0
j"
ies,
fields- 1 7 ;proficiency. in the following relitbd'
?-f A',
MiTt
VIBRATI NIMEA U SOUND'MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS,
S EMENT. AND ANALYSIS!,'��­%4��.�
2 -tit
e�,;VF�z
(Ula§t and Industrial)'
und Level, uctave bana,'ancl Irr ioaqt N61k'Analysis,
Instr0mefitatioh for recording I I
-Healey Conlormande!
�' Rrv, 3
W, elocity— 0i sp I a c e menl�-_--Acc el e ration
Oe 01:1
Walsh
k
L­ aw
-QMPRI
_'HENSIVE SEW.ISMOGRAPHIC
so INVESTIGATION
PCTIRVIE YW
-GEOPHY ICALWE.R TEONSECg�
W.
Complete seismic coverage Of Dlasti,n_g" or,indUStribI V1 brar, ;—Retraction, Reflection, and Electrical Resistivity Surveys
"A ­_1
Z W3
..........
iz,
Mw
4
r . est ViI6r6_Tec
Kt� -1-1 M, ;A"".
JEERS, INC.c

These Blast Vibration Records Have.The
Same Peak Particle Velocity .
Blast A
Blast B
Time (sec.)
I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I i
0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0
But result in entirely different effects on structures and homeowners.
Although these two blasts have produced the some particle velocity, they tell a different story to
VIBRA-TECHNME. Blasting which produces vibrations like blast A will quickly produce complaints from your
neighbors.
The RSVP analysis of these two recordings shows that blast A
-RiVFL-- contains significant energy at those frequencies which match the
natural frequency of residential structures. Maximum transfer of
RESPONSE SPECTRA VELOCITY PROFILE vibrations Into the Structures has occurred.
RSVP Blast A
Residential
Structures
10 20 30 40 50
Frequency of Structure (Hz.)
*J
a�
N
c
1.5
Residential
7+
Structures
.0
1.0
7
.5
i�
a�
or=
Vibrations like those produced by blast A will create a public rela-
tions problem. Now with VIBRA-MAP the explosive user is able to get
his blasts to look like blast B rather than blast A.
RSVP Blast B
10 20 30 40 50
Frequency of Structure (Hz.)
When you have the right tools, analyzing and controlling blast vibrations is easy ...
TOLL FREE USA SM233-6181 TOLL FREE PA BM582-6374
CONSULTANTS TO THE MINING, QUARRYING, CONSTRUCTION AND EXPLOSIVE USING INDUSTRIES
�N`vibra-tech engineers, inc.
Hazleton, PA
[phone]
Rockville, MD
(301 762-8175
Charlotte, NC
[phone]
Pittsburgh, PA
[phone]
Atlanta, GA
(404 972-8775
Louisville, KY
[phone]
Philadelphia, PA
[phone]
St Louis, MO
314 837-7182
Abington, PA
215) 572-8072
Delron, NJ
[phone]
Miami, FL
(305 437-0300
Chicago, IL
�312) 437-0380
Peekskill, NY
[phone]
San Marcos, TX
(512 353-8069
Charleston, WV
[phone]
Knoxville, TN
[phone]
Denver, CO
1[303� 429-1996
Home Office:
1st & North Church Sts„ Hazleton, PA 18201

r �kcy't�, ri+� OsSa�ftr�[�' :�JF'g• j 3�-y�n � �-S�l� w�3 ���i ri z "`�i ��C sk. Ky �. �c�5� � �~ -ir3�' < `.. '' 1
,:7"'i�•n,r�±.;� a:, �;'�.a�'m.i..�. �.:t,;.F�. h-..-b+'drY'3ncf'.��Z..�'�'_�s.a',. "�%?r.._.?'G��: `-a�•.'� � +�1:�!
TF
p p
- t 1, a •. ,= � y � r y- .f rx i� ! _i roF - �',
> Nr�9 S +t.p Y •d y r � c -I r �., a '.� ems; �f "'k 4'�t ya. r�a•r � '�' w 'f. _� x r - '-
�
.r. �
�•..r .. -�- a I- ti i �r sGWi o � �, _ i.9: . p'' E
Oq
A
m.R,it��k Yr TgzLl
..Jy.
J s •:n _,a.n•�. �:_
aQa
s° rx�y'-r�� .i
V.
Y S o ' � � � ^wT� F � •� . � 4
7.•,. �+�ir44'�in . w� �;F,.^.. � - �'�. _ '? `.,.__:k`!.. i, n — . �s ,.._��i.k .,».__ ! rd• .&
Si•m
�` r
>y 'y4 � ✓k '� v��F _ it 'd}�F� F
i h g } rytii+r�a3:;
. y it h G - ' � On't •�:'
kr x3.r"""- - • by
a ti s6 i�x'•S.x'k r}.,�. 14 yi 2""!''J � �lf•�.!
�; .': '�.,,i5` %+-�i r, �
key
4-' i-�,`..".a
�n
w.n•>.vt
.+ s+•fi
r y* +�-.'" k"d+ rt k•�
�„-
ri
w. �,� - t .p �
:,. J
� _ � y�' i
. i
- SJ.,l J � e! r.i '"✓••4IJs 4 ['riw
�irry � . '
n
-�..YJJ
i, N ♦
... -, w i
m

- c:1' `,R+,�3•"71'�'Y'� {{!C'-'1. � ry t' � � Y� '4i' Rt'� :i•' i
0. � z. r "�.•# ,fY.�vf ,�Sft?i� 4p+'s'�r'n��L .."'�
-
XX
�Y
4 -
t� s a" F •4 r
C 60 SD Cassette lopes can reCord Continuously up to 30 minutes. Peak meters display ground and air vibration effects.
SPECIFICATIONS:
Range: Ground Motion: Range setting switch: Low: .02-1,0" lsec.
High:.1-4.0"Isec.
Air Overpressure: 100-151 dB Flat.
Frequency Response: Ground Motion: 1-200 Hz.23cIB
Air Overpressure: 5-250 Hz,23dB
Power Requirement: 2x6V Dry Lantern Batteries: up to 75 hrs. operation.
Battery level indicator.
LiUIIUIUIIVII: AUI VIIIUIFI: [:Ullblall Vll JelaUeilcG ailE,.l iilu rLUrivri iirinuictJ by
calibration switch
Dimensions: 17"x14'/4"x17-1/4" overall. Will fit under airline seat.
Weights: 22 pounds without batteries, 26 pounds with batteries.
Equipment Furnished: Seismograph, 2 - 6V Lantern batteries, 3-component
seismic pickup with 6 ft• cable and mounting spike,
air overpressure microphone with 10 ft. cable, 6 tape
cassettes and instruction manual.
, :'x ',!'iw -+4'a t. •S'+i h° '� ;_ T "'`' OR
BRA,TECHSS�-RES • .NSESPECTRA VEL cOR Y,F#L' E (RSVP} f
f The only form of vfbratlon�s, recura ana sis r i
x-. �-� PEAK PARTICLE VEIrUGITY 0:75 INISr+C �• �.
�`'�wlichiakes?Into#aceaurit diatatlonas>�wetl�asi
quericyanci�tSntensEty oafmi]tioilinstructuiol
.r1i .lS+rS>R2 s- ..y., ,f • vn'w2F-$'eM xF. ti;.,xra .
..� ,`FfJ{.]I SJFy Ul.fl.flyJFJ. was. ,,i"j.r r y
2tpfESPCJNSFPECT f '
i Yr'( SR� + - i`� J4 .yy, ,� } �+� L'•-. i. �y�T�y.� ���r �.? t ��. '4£ J •�.1 .� �,, •'G. ♦ 1'f i��. ,�• 'Y{1. .
a
MI
r,'FnN�r
t` pj �. k
;4 ar .yti.�
�+ '3v 4 f iA,ytA; 71+'*1 ;'•�� ` •'- ++_ .rr'?` 'lr+.. r f4n�i '•.c- '�'inF.'`,'�-p1� a�.Y �I �a 5- k f.. �,. aµ '�.. r'Yj•, 1,3�.;
� e.F �•4�.s �r�"' -k -. �
RESPQNSE SP f RA tVELC)CITYyPi20>=11?E'
r� v n t
ra 5 ` ,m . (T1980� Sure' a1�#Ecit'M14nesS�taco"rairin�nen• deld vhQe"�io'GtiaaiwpiY { , xO 5a,,r;�;s;�'`� �{i hE��}s�+Y�>Jn Ctn 'sa ��•b�'y y+�5Pa
wh heVEayystemaacrb,as
tAumirafeacoipi�
"� ^*X
`4 en 9 v
"'4'A3� �i.w N.. i!k , VS' �rAgr 1Ar1f`V �nCSE')tQ G`rEt�r�a � fi�r�" ".-+r" -;• �?� - �1'r• �. �fi.i.�a +�4'+-w•.r �_ '�� +.ter,.• r:?i s.•1 51.,•.` .w...
s a i,"-r FREQUE_NCY'C)F 5TRUGIURE
p y
e.
i
rt��.fh'f
l - w 3wL iriE'Y'"' .�"�.W1✓ 7r'-�A 5t'Tti.--.� 1G 4,: ,.- �.-M�l44. t�--.6"}'�'"".& .i.,' - i'esF..M»" 4"= µ+vr
1'Ja '� 3 �3�` Sw�" D�F� w�•,y, •. ?L.i L'�, �"_`1 �C. - .I-w`•.r'�y"„, "�Y„3-"3,� "�h���..•,�.��h

S
tate of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary November 6, 1987 Director
Mr. Jim Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Co.
P.O. Sox 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
We have completed our review of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control
Plan for Nello L. Teer's proposed North Orange Quarry. There are a few
remaining deficiencies that will have to be addressed. These are:
1). The planned earthern berms are an effort towards visual screening.
However, with a proposed maximum height of seven (7) feet these will
not provide significant visual or noise buffering. The revegetation
plan must be amended to include tree plantings. These must be planted
in multiple staggered rows and consist of a minimum 75% evergreen
varieties.
2). Revision No. 1 on Drawing No. 6 does provide a general construction
sequence for site development. However, more specific details are
needed on how sediment is to be controlled during the construction of
the water retention pond and temporary sediment basin.
A series of diversion swales and stone check dams are needed
downstream of the construction area. The use of an arched filter (see
enclosed detail) should be provided at the open bottom drain to
control the upstream area until dam construction is complete and
impoundment can begin.
3). Silt fences are still shown in areas of anticipated concentrated
runoff such as at the south end of the berm along Hwy 57, southeast
end of the berm north of the Wick's property, and southwest corner of
rhp amp ll hPT-m InrprPri al,,,tflPAQt- of rhi- TPmnnTATv gPriiment Sasin.
Properly designed gravel filter basins or other acceptable
alternatives are needed. On Drawing No. 6, the Silt Fence Detail
notes that silt fences "should not be used in areas of concentrated
flow".
Ill. m.. � �, ll_�L !'_ 1� -r1
r.u. nlu liiini, "Fc,�,t,,, iwn, �.artax,na lion-7oar keKI INIu r,r Yi 7's3 iAi3
An Equal Qppurnrniry AffktrLw iw Act*,n Frnpkaya

Mr. Sprinkle
November 6, 1987
Page 2
4). In the Design Data and Calculations booklet on sheet 1 of 1 dated
9-19-87, the Temporary Sediment Basin calculations appear
satisfactory. However, no scaled drawing was provided. It appears
that the riser is of insufficient height to function properly. It is
recommended that the riser length be at least two times the barrel
diameter for efficient operation. Furthermore, is a perforated riser
to be used? If so, the bottom drain is not necessary.
5). A properly designed channel, including cross -sections, is required for
the discharge from the retention pond emergency spillway.
Furthermore, a suitable filter (rock, synthetic fabric) is needed
beneath the proposed rip rap lining.
6). The location for the proposed disposal area for drill steel, cable,
etc. appears acceptable. However, no details were provided on the
disposal method or final reclamation.
We are still reviewing the Proposed Vibration Monitoring Program and the
Preliminary Geologic and Ground Water Study. We hope to have our comments to
you in the very near future.
Should you have any questions on any of the above please advise at (919)
733-4574.
Sincerely,
L'aNw�t , :�"
Thomas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
TEC/sl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.

C µ STATE q .
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Ind Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor August 3, 1987 Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
Mr. Jim Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Co.
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
Pursuant to your letter of July 20, 1987 please find attached the copies
you requested of the pamphlet entitled "North Carolina Mining".
Your efforts in helping develop a functional line of communication between
your firm and this Department is very much appreciated. Should you need
additional copies of the pamphlet or The Mining Act of 1971 please advise.
TEC/sl
Sincerely,
omas E. Carroll
Mining Specialist
n�
r.v. RVx iicioi, owjcign, +NUIvi `.aiclund 17014-7007 iacpnonc 9iy-733•sa"i3
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acdon Employer

DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
October 30, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Carroll, Mining Specialist
FROM: John Holley, Regional Engin er
SUBJECT: Preliminary Review
N. Orange Quarry Revisions
Nello Teer
(proposed)
The following comments on Teer's response to your 8-25-87 letter
are offered for your consideration (numbering relates to your
letter):
(1) This item appears to be adequately addressed.
rJ� J (2) The typical cross-section appears satisfactory; however,
sediment control has still not been properly addressed
(discussed in more detail later) and the proposed 7' height
does not appear adequate for some locations, particularly
adjacent to the Wick's property.
(3) Although the buffer width appears adequate, the proposed 7'
berm height does not appear sufficient in relation to the
elevation of the adjoining property. However, it is understood
that the quarry is to be expanded into Durham County,
potentially eliminating this problem. How is the runoff east
of the berms to be handled? 7 , �,� ; � d��rtc�t�. ; s -E a weS �� s� r,,(� + e U10
(4)(a) The construction sequence is still not adequate. A detailed
sequence is needed for the proposed water retention pond
including temporary measures during conduit construction
and temporary stream diversion as necessary. Also,
temporary measures for berm construction must be provided
prior to initiation of such construction.
(b) This item has not been addressed. Silt fences are still
shown in areas where concentrated runoff is anticipated.
Properly designed gravel filter basins or other acceptable
alternates are necessary at the following locations as a
minimum:

N. Orange
October 30,1987
2
J t
at the south end of the berm along NC 57.
J -at the weiV�end of the berm along the Wick's property.
-�t of the berm southeast of the proposed temp. sediment
basin.
J -below the temp. sediment basin during its construction. In
that construction of the sediment basin should not take an
extended period of time, a suitable stone check dam is
recommended at this location.
J -at the proposed water retention pond. At this location,
such measures must be incorporated into the construction
sequence. As a minimum, I would anticipate a basin on
either side of the existing channel with diversion swales
to control runoff from the dam area and a stone check dam
within the channel below the site until the conduit is
constructed and and flow is diverted. following diversion,
an arched filter (see enclosed detail) can be provided at
the open bottom drain to control the-U.S. area until dam
construction is complete and impoundment can begin.
(c) The proposed long term measures are appropriate; however
S&E below the system is not adequate as previously noted
and I anticipate problems with the proposed riser -barrel.
Construction will be difficult becuase the riser is only
proposed to be slightly longer than the barrel diameter
(The SCS recommends that the riser length be at least 2
times the barrel diameter for efficient operation).
Further, the plans should clearly indicate that a
perforated riser is to be used if that is the intention.
Lastly, is a bottom drain to be provided as indicated for
this temporary structure? It is not necessary.
(d) This is not adequate. A properly designed cross-section is
required. Also, a filter is recommended beneath the
proposed lining.
(5) Although a detailed review of the submittal was not performed,
it appears that sufficient information is provided to address
the issue. The pre -blast documentation is an excellent
proposal.
a � ) Although detailed review of the submittal was not performed;
it appears that sufficient information is provided to address
the issue.
(7) Although the location appears satifactory, no details or
specifications are provided to address the disposal method and
f innaa_l,:_,reclamation—
if there are any questions, please advise.

QK' \ \ CLASS I RIP RAP (SEE SECTION THRU BASIN 71-pW1
Y \ 1 L PIPER RIP RAP HEADWALL.
FILTER BERLII i
# 5 WASHED STONE. I` THICK z 3' HIGH MIN.
�SEDI
MENt ST
ORAGE AREA
PERSPECTIVE VIPW
NO SCALE
SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE
�-AREAS TO BE DISTURBED
(CUT,PILLED,ETC.) FLOOD STORAGE ZONE
�TO PROTECT EXISTING PIPE INVERTS
F`0w ATURAL GROUND THAT DRAIN 10 ACRES -OR LESS
1.5' M X. V -
NQTE - DIMENSIONS AR u, -
MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE CLASS I RIP RAP
UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. ' 4613 WASHED STONE
MAX. SEDIMENT DEPTH (CLEAN OUT POINT)
PIPE INVERT
RIP RAP HEADWALL GRAVEL & RIP RAP FILTER BERM (BASIN DETAIL
SECTION THRU BASIN FILTER AND CULVERT PIPE
s
NO SCALE
PREPARED BY: WAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
P.O. BOX 651) RALEIGHI N.C. 27602 PHONE 755•6838

TO
DATE 12 /97
SUBJECT O Ve
�}
MESSAGE l v �e-(°�° r` PdC (�_ c��� v 74-
� � ' 1 �' `i`i- eT_
(", l r., �, "'o
v
SIGNED �� v
475
) 0475
SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT • 4
PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
i
rarhonleas
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP

' � .
4
7

�..N^ �';
w � �

H.B. ROWE
Seismometer at Decker res.
Shot at Test hole V1.
3 row shot, 25 ms between 8 holes
Vertical component .
0
4
G 7 8 9 10
ASHVILLE MALL EXPANSION
20
25 30
:< 4 G
4
4
4
3`_
3�
35
Frequency (hertz)

r
Libra -tech engineers incorporated
CONSULTANTS TO THE MINING. OUARRYING. CONSTAUCTION AND EXPLOWE USING INDUSTRIES
FIRST & NORTH CHURCH STS. P.O. BOX 577 HAZLETON. PENNSYLVANIA 18201-0577
September 18, 1985
Super N. Tendent
Sample Mining Company
R.D. 0, Box 0
rrnyen Road
North Icicle, AK 99999
Dear Mr. Tendent:
717�SS-3161
TOLL FRIIEE PA W0-1624W4
TOLL FREE USA WO-283-0181
Attached is a report on the vibra-Map study done for the Bee
Mine. Although the report proper should be consulted for
details, we may summarize the conclusions thus:
1. For 4 explosive columns in a decked hole, we recommend a
delay of 25 ms between decks.
2. For 6 holes in a row, we recommend a delay of 50 ms between
holes.
3. For 3 rows, we recommend a delay of 96 ms between rows.
The above delay time recommendations must, of course, be
implemented using the appropriate blasting practices for safety
and good production at your operation. The calculations assume
equal charge weight per delay. We recommend that you obtain and
use the most accurate initiation system available, consistent
with your other needs. 'If you have any questions regarding this
report, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
VIBRA-T eEN N S, ING.
Douglas Arson, Ph.D.
Research Geophysicist

vibra-tech sample Mining Company Bee Mine
Vibra-Map Report
September 18, 1985
The Vibra-Map method takes advantage of several properties of
blast vibrations. First, the vibration from each explosive
charge in a blast will be very similar to that from other charges
of approximately equal size. Second, this vibration is primarily
determined by the geological characteristics of the path between
the blast and the seismometer location. Third, the vibration
"signature" from a single -charge blast contains all of the
information needed; one does not need to know how the geological
characteristics influence the vibration signature; all one needs
to know is what that signature is. Given the importance of the
signature, the single -charge shots should be detonated near where
the blasting will be taking place, and the seismometers should be
at the locations where vibration may be of concern.
once the single -charge vibration signature has been, obtained
for the appropriate locations, we then use another important
principle of blast vibrations: the waves from each charge may be
added up, or "superposed". Waves are added differently than one
adds numbers; they have crests and troughs, like the waves on
water. If the crests match up, the waves from each charge
reinforce, and the resultant wave is bigger. This is of course
the case when all charges are detonated simultaneously. Delaying
allows us to match the crest of one wave with the trough of
another; however, even with delayed charges, there will be delay
times for which the crests will match again, and those delay
times are related to the frequency of the wave. Each wave, even.
if there is one predominant frequency, as shown on RSVP plots,
has several frequencies present; improving the vibration at one
frequency may make it worse at another frequency. Also, we need
to consider the vibration from all charges. Vibra-Map is useful
because it shows how each of the frequencies is affected by the
delay interval chosen, and also determines delay intervals which
minimize vibration at all frequencies which may disturb
structures.

Libra -tech Sample Mining Company Bee Mine
Attached are several Vibra-Map plots which we have calculated
for the Bee Mine, to determine millisecond delay times for the
best ground vibration. We have determined these times based on a
single -charge shot located at South pit, and recorded on 1
seismometer located at nuclear op wer plant.
Since you use decked shots at Bee Mine, we have first
calculated the best time the delay. between decks. For 4
explosive columns in a decked hole, we recommend a delay'of 25 ms
between decks. You may observe on the appropriate Vibra--Map
plots that the lowest amplitudes taken all across the record are
obtained at this delay. This low amplitude is also shown in the
number at the right of the Vibra-map. This number is a
percentage of the vibration which would occur if instantaneous
detonation occurred. This then forms a new basic signature, with
a new frequency spectrum. We then use this new signature to
create Vibra-Map plots to determine the optimum time between
holes in a row. We have assumed that you use 6 holes in a row,
and therefore recommend a delay of 50 ms between holes..
This then forms a new basic signature, with a new frequency
spectrum. For multiple -row shots, we then use the signature
obtained from the best time between holes, and then calculate the
best time between rows. C i ne-e vnIl fxmi rra 1 1 v shoot I r.^T. � M} use
Mine, the Vibra-Maps indicate that the best vibration would be
obtained with a delay of 96 ms between rows.

vibra-tech sample Mining Company Bee Mine
We would like
and disclaimers:
to emphasize a few points, first some warnings
1. We are recommending the delay times alone, with the primary
consideration being the improvement of ground vibration.
You need to determine how these times fit with your
blasting practice, for safety and good production at the
Bee Mine.
2. We have tried to use our knowledge of your current blasting
practice in these recommendations; however, we cannot be
responsible for lack of availability of particular
explosive products, or difficulties in blast design
generation to fit within these delay times. If you have
such difficulties, though, we will try to suggest
alternatives, which may not be quite as good as the
recommendations given here.
3. Although we have recommended delays which we feel are
consistent with good production practice, we will neither
take credit for improvements, nor accept blame for
decreases in productivity.
4. Finally, we are confident in the fundamental principles
upon which Vibra-Map is based, and upon our application of
these principles; however, since we have no control on
either explosive product performance, or how those products
are used, we cannot be held responsible for vibration
tri Vwi 41i1 r7 iGsYi 41ny from shots ih1i114i1 were designed, In part,
using the Vibra-Map method.
Finally, we would like to clarify the assumptions and
definitions which the Vibra -Map method uses, so that there is no
misunderstanding about application of the method:
1. The method currently assumes that delays remain constant
during -the shot. At present we cannot determine the
optimum delays for shots with variable relief, such as may
be achieved with some of the more recent initiation
systems; however, we hope to have such capability soon, if.
interest warrants it.

vibra-tech gale Mining Company see Mine
2. The calculations assume the same number of decks (4) in
each hole and the same number of holes (6) in Each row.
Small changes in the basic pattern will make little
difference; however, and extremely irregular shot may
generate different vibration than that produced by the
dQsigns discussed here_
3. Multiples of a particular delay interval are not equivalent
to that delay interval. For example, if we recommend 25 ins
between holes in a row, you should not use 50 ms initiators
in their place; Multiples of a recommended delay interval
are often much worse than the suggested interval.
4. The calculations assume equal charge weight per delay.
Small differences (10 - 15%) will have little effect on the
results; however, if you are going to have substantial
differences between column charges, we will need that
information for the calculations.
5. We recommend that you obtain and use the most accurate
initiation system available, consistent with your other
needs. The more accurate your firing times are, the- more
predictable the vibration is, and the more effective the
Vibra-Map method is. More accurate firing times should
provide other productivity benefits; however, you should
consult your explosives supplier to'discuss this.
We hope that we have covered most of the questions you may
have; however, once again, if you do have any questions regarding
this report, or if we have misunderstood either the type of shot
pattern, the relative importance of particular locations, or
other restrictions you may have, please feel free to contact us.

vibra-tech
Sample Mining Company Bee Mine
The following pages are Vibra-Maps which show the best delays
for between deck times for 4 charges per column. We have chosen
to compute the Vibra-Maps for the component or components
f transversP_ 1 whj n! -i ah^w t};e Wos4- r -+- -4. 4 ., �...� t t ,
- -/ �.. rwvb A14.&al for causing pro-ble-m
vibration. From these plots, we recommend a delay of 25 ms
between decks (emphasized by hash marks).

SAMPLE MINZN BEE MINE
Seis. at Nuclear Power Plant Shot at South Pit
Single column shot, 4 decks in column
Transverse component
0,a••..... 4...... ..00OOxxxxKx1WNN :::::::..::::......:+0+0+:::.
,. •. ...
199
4. OOOO �E�E NNN•::::::..:•••
................. . .......
.:+:+•
.....
..
192
a..* ............... 000OXXXXXXISSS ... ......
......
176
12
... •..•....++++MMMM xxO00.00.... ..
.. ..
163
++++ :••
20
...,.. :::OOOOSSS.. ..
141
2 8
138
32
::::000:;:
.•.::.
..
139
36
....++++SSS... ..
...++:;:.
145
40
•...++++SSS...
.:+:0+:..
145
44
....+++++++
:+0:+:.
141
140
52
:.... ......
... .. .......
:: ..
.
..
138
56
..,, +++::: ..,.::....
...
..
140
60
:. ........SSS• • ..
.::....
..
.. .
141
64
++++SSS•.. ............
.. .. ..
..
144
'•
144
72
....++++:::......::::....
.. .:;::.
144
76
....++++...+++...::::..
.. .++:.
...
146
so
........SSS000:::::.. ..
::0:.
148
84
.•.. WWWSSS::..,..
.+:+.
of
149
88
....++++NNXNNN:::..
.+0:.
156
92
SSSSj]RxMM.....
:++...
..
160
96
HHHHV=SSS... ..
::.
160
100
...,MMMM311ISSS ....:...
.:.
166
104
.,.:HHH +++ .. ....
"'
••
....
.
167
108
++++iiIili ::: ......
....:.
167
112
++++iExx*Xxx • •
......
• •
. ......
63
116
0000HKKkVWW... .. • a :: • •
++.
160
120
00009999SSS... ...:.•
:0:
157
1 �f A
w M
A A A A T.R T[JT.T a•• .•
v v v v n n Fv n ... • . • • • . . • •
• L
• . ' •
• . •
' S 2
128
.....000ONNNN:::•.a ......
.0...
..
151
132
.....00000000000... ...•.a
:0... ..
149
136
...•.••.•..0000...•SSS ......
.+: .:.
147
140
...........++++....SSS..a .... ..
::.. ..
..
149
144
............ •:::::+++ ::..
...
145
;.; ..
:
144
••
145
156
•.......... +++++++......::.. ..
.. ++ .
..
146
160
go, ... ....::::SSS ::::: ....
..0.
146
:•:••:
145
168
...... .... 000+++::... ..,.
.:... ..
..
144
172
...... .........::000:.. ::..
0:. .:.
147
176
...... ....++++...SSS... ..::..
:0 .. ..
148
180
•..... ....++++SSSNNN..... ..::
+:. ...
'52
184
•a.••• ++++WWWNNN to ::.,
.+ •• :..
,.
153
188
...... .. ..
::::NXXSSS ::
::. .:•
.
.
154
192.....•
..... a. ....INSI000 ••::
...+.,
156
196.0000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [... • . . •
: . +: .
.
157
200.aa..•a
....++++jtKi]1... ..
....0.0. a•.0
158
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Frern�anry Minrt-1

vibra-tech
Sample Mining Company
Bee Mine
The following pages are Vibra-Maps which show the best delays
for between hole times for 6 holes in a row. Again, we have
chosen to compute the Vibra--Maps for the component or components
(transverse) which show the. most potential for causing problem
vibration. From these plots, we recommend a delay of 5o ms
between holes in a row (emphasized by hash marks).

SAMPLE MINIM SEE MINE
Seis. at Nuclear Power Plant Shot at South Pit
6 hole shot, 24 ms between 4 decks
Transverse component
0+++++++HH.HMHH+++++XXKX1W*1HHH+++:::0000++0000++.•
:SSWHOSO:
.;.00
NOS+:199
4+++++++HHHHHH+++++}{}fKKXW00M+++:::++00::++++:;,.
,++0+::..
..
ISO
8+++++++NNNNNN:.:::I+MMMffiXRESSS:.:...::::......
.......
..
160
12++++++.SSSSSS:::::NNNNWWWW+++..: ......
....
..
147
16:::::::000000..... ++++++++ ........,.
......
..
.. 136
20••:•.. ................................
..
,P,
24..••.•....... ::::0000:::... ....
....
0+0+:134
28,,,,... ++++0000... •. •.
....
..00
S:: 134
32 ...•.... met ++++++++ •... to
... .:+.
•: o
m.. 131
36 ::::::.....:.:;.......... ....
.OSOS+.
..
..• 134
40.......:::::: •.o.•:::••. of
.00WN+:
..
to 135
44. ....; .,..++++... ..,.
.S00....
0
•. 134
48 132
133
56..0•o•• :::: ... memo ::00++..
.. .. .
+0
132
•••: :
131
64 ...... ++++... ... ::++00++
.. ....
..
132
68 ...... ....++++ ... ..00++++ ,.
...: ++.
.. 134
72 ...... ::::.............++00:: to
•.:OS:
•.:+:135
76 ....., ::::....::: .:.00++......
OHO..
+00. 138
80....... ....++++......:::++.. .,
. +WS
to
N... 136
84..m6.m. 0000 :::::::. ., ..
OSO..
+0
.. 135
88............. ::::++++++++++:;;.... ..
:5:...
me:
136
7!. • • r • • • TTTT • • • • O•.7.7'T� • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • •
• • • 134
96 .,.. ++++OOOOHHH+++ ,. ..
.... ,•
.:135
100 •,.,.. ::::MMM)*UHH::: .. .... to
,. ...:.
.:S. 141
104 ........... )MR111HHH...... a• ......
. ...+0.
N+ 146
108 .....++++ XMSSS .. .. ::..
•.•+S•
.:
+. 146
112•... moo .•a•.NNIMM+++moo to ..::++
. .00•0
:0
151
116...•...too me. WWWWRINIjIN ... ......00::
.OH..
.+
..151
120............ mo e9eexxxx... .. ++00
•:W:.
:.,
...150
124 ::::::.....HKXKHHHH::: .0640.00::.o
.SO:
..
0 : 149
128 ::::::..... XXKK::::...... ..::00
0+. ...
.0:. 142
':
136 ...... :::::HHHH000O... ,,::++
::.,. •+•
..
138
140 +++++00000000... 00..•...
be •.++
:0
...j37
144.......::;;;:+++++....::::...... ..00 ..
..::0
+
...::E37
148...•.•.++++++:::::..., .••++++..
.....0..
..
..+: 135
152....... SSSSSS::::::::::::: 000a..0•,•.m
•N:..
.++, 141
156....••.NNNNNN:::::++++++++.,•6•..,,QO „
**ON..
•
S+. 145
160....... HHHHHH,....::::++++......:::::.. 00......
W
..
0.. 143
164 HHHHHH ..,........ :::.... ....::
•00:....
.:
•e... 139
168 HHHHHH ..•. ::: ..++
00.0 .•.
.0
o...:136
172....... HHHHHH ....::::......:::.... ,.++..
So.. 0
0.
..::.143
176.•..,..NNNNNN..... ;:::++++::::::..... 00
.S....+:
.0. 143
180::::..:SSSSSS.....::::.......+++ ::++,.
:. .0.
0. 141
184:•:::::000000 ..... me. +++ ......00..
:....0
.,
N 138
188+++++++:::::: ::::+++:::•,,,, 00..
.++,
•.
.136
192+++++++...... ....00OOSSS... ..++.•
...H ..
.:
.:139
196+++++++ ::::OOOOHHH me::..
.00.
.+
+.E39
200+++++++...... ::::++++HHH... .•,.++,...
..W....:
0.
•.S 144
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Frequency (Hertz)

vibra-tech
L
Sample Mining Company► Bee Mine
The following pages are Vibra-Maps which show the best delays
for between row times for 3 rows. Once again, we have chosen to
compute the Vibra-Maps for the component or components
(transverse) which show the most potential for causing problem
vibration. From these plots, we recommend a delay of 96 ms
between rows (emphasized by hash marks).

SAMPLE MININ BEE MINE
Seis. at Nuclear Power Plant Shot at South Pit
3 row shot, 52 ms between 6 holes, 24 ms between 4 decks
Transverse component
0.............
++++++++.........
....
++00:...
..:....
MHS.
199
4•,�•.�...•...
++++++++
++++::
: WSO.
192
I'll .....
...,
..::...
171
12.............
++++++++.....:
....
..::..
+::
171
16.............
++++::::.,....
..
....
:.
163
20.............
::::::::
..
0++.
161
..:.
: OHS.
172
28.............
::::..,,
......
eNO.
171
32.............
........
....
.....
S:,
161
.,�
:.
..
153
___
40.......
....
.::,..
0:.
156
44.......
....
.,::..
..::..
.:.
157
48
::++::
....
HNS.
167
52
00 . . . . , .
: : ++ : :
.6
: MH S .
171
56
.,.... ,.
....
++00::
: WO:
166
60
. . . . . . . .
. , . ,
++ ++ . .
00
. . . .
158
64
........
....
++++..
+::
160
.:::0.
155
72
+00.
157
76
.... ...
....
..
.:...
MHS.
167
168
84
. . . . . . . . . . . to
0.
. . , .
: •
: N :
159
158
92158
96
158
100
::::++++......
::::.,
NNS.
171
104
..::++++......
..++:.
..
9HO
176
108
++++++++......
;:++;:
,.
: M+
172
112
++++++++...
::++::
....
+.:
168
116
++++++++...
++++..
.:..
::
166
120
++++++++
..
++::
....
+ +.
167
124
++++::::
..
::..
.::
:SS.
167
128
++++::::
..,.
:: ..
.:.
WHO
170
132 ......
++++::::
,,..
.. ..
...
MS.
170
136
•
164
140 ......
++++....
....
..
.. ..
.:.
160
159
148 ,.....
:::;
..
.. ..
...a
:+S,
160
152 ......
..;.
.,
..
......:
...
SNS.
167
156............a
........
.,
::::
.:..
9N:
170
160.............
........
..
..++::
.:.
a+.
170
�•
•
I
168 ...
..
••++..
•• .
164
.
++:•
SS.
166
180.............
.... ...
++..
.. ..
HH+
170
164..'
..., ......
:: ..
.. ,.
No
167
188:.......:....
.... ......
..
....
..
W
165
. .,
162
196.............
..............
.,
..
:.
+.0.
163
2 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . : ; : : . . .
. . . .
, , . . . . . .
. :
, *.OS.
170
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Frequency (Hertz)

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary September 9, 1987 Director
Mr. Andrew J. Miles
Process Engineering Department
Radian Corporation
2700 Little River Drive
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
RE: Nello L. Teer's Proposed Crushed Stone Quarry
Orange County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Miles:
Thank you for your letter of September 3, 1987 concerning the proposed
crushed stone quarry in Orange County. The concerns expressed in your letter
certainly deserve evaluation. Before a decision to grant or deny the permit is
made, these concerns as well as any other concerns within the jurisdiction of
G.S. 74-51 of The Mining Act of 1971 will be carefully considered. During the
application review, site inspections will be made and comments from other
agencies concerning potential impact to wells and groundwater will be sought as
well as effects on wildlife, water, and air quality. We will carefully
scrutinize any report submitted by the applicant or testing agency to insure
that these reports are accurate and indicative of available well data and that
the report's conclusions are reasonable in nature.
Again, thank you for your interest in this matter. I assure you that a
careful review will be made before granting or denying this application. A copy
of the hearing report summary will be forwarded to you under seperate cover by
Mr. Jim Holloway's office.
Very truly yours
yt4�q 4
Thomas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
TEC/TED/sl
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
PO &a 27W, k*igh, North Gro" 27611-76U Tekphone 919-733-3833
An EAR Oppominny Affirmative Action EFnOom

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary December 17, 1987 Director
Mrs. Elizabeth Carpenter
Route 3, Box 70A
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
RE: Nello L. Teer Company's
Proposed North Orange and North Durham Quarries
Dear Mrs. Carpenter:
Thank you for your letter of December 14, 1987 concerning Nelln Teer's
proposed North Orange and North Durham Quarries. As of �,C this date
.4J no mining
permits have been issued for the above sites as our office has not yet received
all of the necessary materials from Nello Teer in which to complete our review
of the proposed projects. Additional information was requested on November 6,
1987 for the proposed North Orange Quarry and on'December 1.1, 1987 for the
proposed North Durham Quarry. Our review process can not resume until this
information has been received.
Again, thank you for your interest in this matter. 1 can assure you that a
careful review will be made before granting or denying these applications.
Very truly yours,
` Tracy E. Davis, E.I.T.
Assistant Mining Specialist
TED/cj t
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Yo. &vc 276R7, Rakigh, North Carolina 27611-7647 Ii4c� 919733_38;;
An Equal opportunity AFfirmanw Action Frnpkryer
V

�� �
___� _ _ ____ _ ___ � _____ __- y__ __
v

_. �_�� � � �; _. __�. _ ���- ..�. ..__ �. .ti ..._ ter- ._ _ .. �� ♦ .. _ �. _ _ � _ �__ __ _ _ �.-r - � _� -.... �.
._. _ _�. _ �._ �. ���-_ .�..�� __ �_ �� �_._ _ ��i_ �._ _�� .ter.... �_f�._�_w..�� .t_��-. �-a _ _ �.- - �� � ...�. �_ ��.. _ _ �__.

e

---_.. _. ..-. w�2w-� �u�rx__-✓_.G�Gc-r1_s_�! cc�7`S -� _._. _��J"��ST_� � l�c�
Xj
1,04
zlli
r
— ------ — .r W ; G�S 2.0 ' s�}�-�ti,r, �c...��Lc1C�l .•-_.�_�..� ��_ _

4
r

-- -'--------------- -7- --------------------- ------'------
—IS 0- 2- Y- 68 jb it
vv

�-
_ � _ � _ _ .... _ _ _ . _. _ � _ � _ _ .. _ � _ _ _ . _ _ �.� _ � � _ _ _ _ � _ � � . _ _ .._ .T _ . _ v � _ � _ — . _ _ . _ _ . _ .. � _ �_ _. a _ _ _ _ . .. _ -. _ � _ _
�.. ��_� �. ��. _.�.._.__ _ �_ .,. .�.. - __. ��� �- ���.. �.. .--^��. ___ _. _ __ _.ram.. .��� �.��- �.___.. �� ��_- ��. �.. ..
_�. .. �Y, �.-��.-....__.___., _. __ _ __ __ _ � � _ ___.. _._� __ __ __, �_ __..�__ .. __ _. �- .,.--.�_ ,��_ _._ _ �._ _ .�.-
i
. __ __ __� _�__ _ __. _. �,_�__r�_ __-�_.__ __._... ___�._ ____.__�.__ - _. _.._ _. ��.. t�..� ��.a _� .�-__-.

e
O
i

7, y'
f _
r� _ � .���.�. _ ��a�.� r.r �r.a rr r� _�.�� f ... _ _ ar � _.♦ -..��f � - r �r _� ��. � � .ems � .�.�.'r� � __�� - �.' -a�� � -�.
...- »-�-�r-�-��- w y -��--.-..� �. �.--��.._ � � ��� .-... __ _ � � � � � _ ,...... ...� ���» - �.` `.ter- ��•
��. ___ ���� -.�-� .��_ �_� t--_._�_i+�_ __� ��.a.� _ �_ r � � .may r_ __ r � � �• - -� � �,��.�.. .. ��..r � �-._ _ _ _..���.

0
I

. �.�- _.. _"-___- -_.._ _-��-...--«- w _.._ �.�-..-- ^--__ -..�- _.r--_. _ � .-r - �-�-. _. .� __ - �.._ ._� �._ .p. -- �-.. - -
�� ._ _.. _.� J.�.. _ ___ � �-.� ._ ... __w.�.,.,,, .L- __.-. �_ _ � __ � �,_ -__ _.�. _ _ ��. _-.._� � __ . .

Sol ��
a
P E COUNTY
4 r600 co W 1fi01 t605 1606 t 1610 I
Lyndover r� p�aUNT k471 1471 l601 a° f60
! Red o rto.
Y«� y�EO t w
16 N71 N14 Mountain {' ra
! 4CO1606 t I
ti �Q `*rya°" 1471 1603 t _.
" N ampton
NT3 RougMID t 6 N G IV.
4
j l 0 1 TATE r0
o NATIO
sornRpN „ 7r a = � ,
1 RD 1477P 4 t GUARD
146-9 �i� L UN1IYE I �Y..16f1 f603 ft 1 T ! 1 ,6f0 RANGE
': 4 K6,r AREA
FOREST 1
Quail Roost 6o r6r6 t
qN y' r16d
nQu fof0
� �, L,OIifERE1t�E o `! IOr O
11b6 f1fi5 t10 r7 s+ P RA f
$01 161f 16 RBI
n }
146' f<66 A 'p 1 IMOP1cIN$ 1466 RD. 1• PE
r.
r
aE4� RD, o 1616
O CL k11
Z
16r0 �' p 1616
t465 164 Qp O
h
617 Bahama
f4� ✓^ f615 WI Ir
®A
16r6 MIAN6�1µ rr 1 U
o RD. 1619 zip rsrT @ 1Cr
s
J
DOE ERR IS I w
1 y 116t dJrtR ��6fi�r6lT 1619 r6P6 U f a
1003 Willard 'Ile 1624 fir•
f1461so Q _
R1460 po 1675 an arc f615 ! CIO
Facto -P,
�pSpN IL
R qq- 50, Ngt 1610DO 2
V gyp► l73P u
r r459 Hunt J
> - DL
tIS1 0 5k0
NS3 q #'•
w, N35 �iT F61rnt0
AIL! z
t Q
rv��1 1003
i9/y 1706 �C
! yf o C ix
r � ys rasp t ,6 6 0
c�
Q Vti- IN DR. o GOOD �1< 40,16�0 r6 1004 a C�
2
1 t15J k'., r4S3 S
jf 1639
IAT
�UW01 Ro
N49 ;449 o p 1104 163 3 a9 r +
„ SIN y
r.1�, r55G o 1615 AM r631
1548 n4Y
556 a° p� !7 •.
1, Sfi y�0r 1 �HEBRDN RD. 2 f634<,
O �
n�
r1U3 `'� 4'p9 ` � J !61 1656
r 1.1r� 1404 - 1443 / a MI-:63
1003 /l616 WeOVer l4 : ffiTT i6,0
• G < j'1j� . A - t.
i
1.oe r ; �,�` r6sl ds/ ov;.� �
CS
Huckleber 1651"8 F _.—•r636 1515
�i1.J's.li Senn Y 1650 lssr;� «<` :_` 1s71�s 1
Burton o ion"91
1 v-Lvo 1 6U ys / _ Id:'PD[f8td CHEEK
w

Mr. Thomas Carroll
Mining Specialist
M. C. Dept. of Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
P. C. Box 27637
Raleigh, P4. C. 2761.1.
Dear Mr. Carroll :
Rt. 3, Box 70A
Rougemont, N. C. 27572
Dec. 1.4, 1987
and Community Development
Was the Nello L. `Peer Co. granted a mining permit for their proposed
crushed stone nuarry in Orange Co.? V!e never heard anything about it
after the date on which you were to have either granted or denied a
permit.
They did advise us that they had applied for a mining permit for the
Durham County portion of the same proposed roctc quarry, the application
dated October 9, 1987.
It is of special interest to us since our Farm will be almost in the
confer � � of tii." ,iwurr+tr J f thntr rl g,.I- their * 4-pnii tc T t,ai ll ar�nrF,+�l a%ry
,Y ".Y a r
it if you will let me knout what has been done about issuing the permits.
Thank you very much.
Yours very truly,
Mrs. Elizabeth Carpenter
.IV
DEC 16 1981
tN+n ONALITY SECTION
1

�:q.A� w-n - �. .-. r . �, y t.a 1�} .... .l, r � r ,� — .� � .a .. ... .. .. .. ._ ._ �, � _� r r .. _ _ e r.s .�.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
. August 13, 1987
Chapel Hill Newspaper
ATTN: Classified Department
P. 0. Box 870
Chapel Hill, N. 4. L7514
Dear Sir:
Please run the attached as a legal ad in your morning paper on or
before August 20, 1987.
Please invoice us at the address below in triplicate and include the
appropriate affidavit. Should you have any questions on this matter,
please advise immediately at [phone].
Sincerely,
t %r
Charles H. Gardner, C.P.G., P.E.
Chief, Land Quality Section
CHG:gf
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
PO Hrtu 77m7_ RAiA Nr nh C."i. 77f11.7fR7 TA-nfvr 919.717.;a32
An Equal Opporum ty Affirmative Anion Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
nivkinn of I and Resoiirrm
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
August 13, 1987
News of Orange County
ATTN: Legal Department
P. 0. Box 580
Hillsborough, N. C. 27278
Dear Sir:
Please run the attached as a legal ad in your morning paper on or
before August 20, 1987. V v
Please invoice us at the address below in triplicate and include the
appropriate affidavit. Should you have any questions on this matter,
please advise immediately at [phone].
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, C.P.G., P.E.
Chief, Land Quality Section
CHG:gf
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
P.O. Box 276F7, Rakixh, North Camlina 27611.7697 Tekolxx►e 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Affinnafrie Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
August 13, 1987
Durham Morning Herald
Classified Department
ATTN: Ms. Gay Kelly
P. 0, Box 2092
Durham, N. C. 27702
Dear Ms. Kelly:
Stephen G. Conrad
Director
Please run the attached as a legal ad in your morning paper on or
before August 20, 1987.
Please invoice us at the address below in triplicate and include the
appropriate affidavit. Should you have any questions on this matter,
please advise immediately at [phone].
Sincerely,
Charles H. Gardner, C.P.G., P.E.
Chief, Land Quality Section
CHG:gf
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Holley
PNa Ba- 2769Z Q,L4.4. AL—J, ry..,I. '17K,i 7,<P7 'i'' ..- 010722_29]]
An Equal (* ommity Affirmatives Action Fanpi M

NORTH CAROLINA
CLIPPING OF LEGAL
ADVERTISEMENT ORANGE COUNTY.
ATTACHED HERE
NORTH CgROLiNA DEPART'•' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
OIRNAT'URAL RESOURCES ' :
COMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENT a
$ t s r•: Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State,
QU6LlC NOTICL� '� .a.. sl duly commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths,
Notice ,� h? , 6 ; eby
`' he
., � �� ' David 0. Jones
`_hearing';,to`be. Id:•kiy.t'e,Noith" I Personally appeared..................................................................................................
Carolina'<Department a of ; ,Natural
Resources; and"r omriiunttY ,...........................'-...............................................
........ w t n who being firs duly
Development ooncernirig'_iheNe410
d L T69r COm S icatlori.fo[ a'' sworn, deposes and says: that he (eke) is an authorized employee of
P�1Y- aPP�.. �::.
:,mining'perrtiit�l4r a'carushed:;"stoned The News of Orange County, engaged in the publication of a newspaper
n r, . r g g P
,':quarry ott?Highway,,5T; north'ot known as The News of Orange Count
Caldwell •in Orange County, North g y published, issued, and entered as
Carolina :'. " t•'j second class mail in the City of Hillsborough, in said County and State;
AUTHOFi1iY: FI:C.G.S: 74b#�ar�d�l that he (3fiP) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement;
'Ttle:' 15; ::Chapter•';5
1f
SUbehapte{,55,.5ecgon that the notice. or other: legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
ti pLACt=;f�MME; DA1 .August;31 ^+ attached hereto, was published in The News of Orange County on the
t887 .7:00. P:M.- ''Orange; Countysl
CbUrttj., ,
PURPOSEuTarreihie cdiiii�ite `'
,
r
rvom.'
Au st 1987
._RPOS 'S,TO ,r1t,,,atio,' lnr �� following dates: ............................7........_..............................................................
x i.�, r..'
r0I&1t1#u Atu _tine•, „r t•�•.ss: i'
minirtgpe _ ,atone
quarry H htrrar b7 ,st`g�Norit+l
Carol na app_, (nlatety. and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or
i1�e8/'�r1�01thAyb88�1�_�`Tin
legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
I•lJ1 FlIR70�./ati�.Ty.z9': ,yY,9�G XH+"R�:.1�� `
' COMMEN _t- ROCEDURE:�AIII such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and quali-
fications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and
€rivitod � atesnd:;�The,hearing;wgl,i?e ' '
,::_• was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the
�conduc�ad In tfio'f6k,*Wng rriahn�r:u_
't =f=7iplanatfon otthesparrnit General Statutes of North Carolina.
A* rocodurea ^
ttie0w
as net, fori In'tThe '
L'Mining`q�ct�ot1l�by iabnrof
,.. hand
'�►ndlsResouu� i 25th August 8']
° S&a1d,r ,�, J, ; This ...................... day o2 . , iD...........
natlan of the aat�n for
hicti R-4-4.3d'requirsd-bll -Z.
' �o`Mmorsts; .................................. .,..(1/ ...... ,4
to 6 teft. data; sf, 4 . 4 (Signature o9 person m nr"J�wldavit)
i foir a.5, maX# '. ubmRted In ;
yrrittrsg prbr W or.shsls►g tM h,ea
oi' may?tie„prosonied orailyzatATt l I
: Per80i'1s d@glrht°te,6a1t Sworn to and subscribed before me; this ..::.........
`will iMfcats:this'iiitantat'•ite,tbnsoi
r•-1gistration;atie hearinq�'s8o�`that'
j+ �, , .•■,�` ... ,,._w,,.� day of ..... 1D.S'7.
,soie hyistatemen<emaye ;
Yl Mited`"at;, the��diacrPtian�� of Sthe Q
hearing;ofticer' Oral Preen tU :...
4,__'"I fi'exceed three riiiriutss'mtrst�iye ' , r
aocorrt nle<tayttisee1(3jLwriiten Notary -'Public
t` wl�Iclti'wlllbe tiled` wi#h'the'
' hearino,.officer at they tlme'of. M Commission E�cpires . (J��i�l ........._ ..
y �� ' 9U%
rregiatration �,;t; F;�'1 L .,..
' �' a r
�:1g:4:=Cross examination of persons,
.[cam ar pies ntTno estlMony
oweVertthe 'hearing:"-
;;. ofiicer,`�may' asR: gt;tln��pna =: ��-•
•1k
%n +5 Thte� rote idingsi Ilk i ' a n.
t gq,
NFQRMATt?N:

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of North Carolina
County of Durham
Donna B. Minor
being duly sworn
says that she is the Principal Clerk of The Du
be
Herald Co., Inc. publishers of
Durahm Morninq Herald
A newspaper published in and of general
circulation in said County, and that a
notice of which the annexed is a true
copy, -was published in said newspaper one
time
on the 20th
day of Au st 19 87
Principal Clerk
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
3rd day of September 19 87
uora (; �,hlic
My commission expires
My Commission Expires December 16, 1991
Durham County, North Carolina
I

SENDER: Complete items i and 2 when additlonal services are desired, and emplete Item and4.
Put you'.r' address'l;n the "R ETU RN TO" space on the reverse side. Fa1lure to do this will pmvaat this,
card from being -returned to you. The return receipt fee wlll erovide you the name of the eerson
delivered -to and the date of dellvery. or additional fees the following services are available. Consult
postmaster, for. fees and check box (es) for additional services) requested.
1. 'Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery.
3. Article 'Addressed to:
4. Article N"bet I
Mr. Darrell Ray Harris.
- 2E�± -
Typo of Service:
Rt , 3. Box bM�
Rou emont , North Carolina 27572
lneumd
Certified � COD
Express Mail
Always obtain sionsture of address so or
went and DATE 4E6LY j Eli.
5. Slanatu a Addresses r
A, Addr�gg'g Arfrfreava IMIt v f
requestdearrd fee padJ
,el 3
6. Signature — Agent
X
�
7. Date of Delivery/I- � 'li
c r
'
PS Form 381 , Febz6 [ f` ,+, DOMESTIC RV(URN RECEIPT
fllel/knt

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your name, address, and ZIP Cady
in the space below.
* COmplate items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
the reverse.
• Attach to front of article If space
pormhs, otherwise affix to back of
article.
v Endorse article "Return Receipt
Requested" adjacent to number.
RETURN
TO
4i •'141 wy„Fyy��
LLSMAIL
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
t
USE, $300
Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code In the space below.
4Ij9 - 0 }F P.O. Box 27687
;.
2(9 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development concerning the
Nello L. Teer Company's application for a mining permit for a crushed stone
quarry off Highway 57 north of Caldwell in Orange County, North Carolina.
AUTHORITY: N.C.G.S. 74-51 and N.C.A.C. Title 15, Chapter 5
Subchapter 5B, Section .0011.
PLACE, TIME, DATE: August 31, 1987
7:00 P.M.
Orange County Courthouse
Superior Courtroom
PURPOSE: To receive comment related to the application for a mining
permit for a crushed stone quarry located east of North
Carolina Highway 57 approximately 5 miles northeast of
Caldwell in Orange County.
COMMENT PROCEDURE: All persons interested in this matter are invited to attend.
The hearing will be conducted in the following manner:
1. Explanation of the permit procedures as set forth in
The Mining Act of 1971 by the Division of Land
Resources, Land Quality Section.
2. Explanation of the action for which a permit is
required -by applicant. (Optional)
3. Public Comment - Comments, statements, data, and other
information may be submitted in writing prior to or
doing the hearing or may be presented orally at the
hearing. Persons desiring to speak will indicate this
intent at the time of registration at the hearing. So
that all persons desiring to speak may do so, lengthy
statements may be limited at the discretion of the
hearing officer. Oral presentations which exceed three
minutes must be accompanied by three (3) written copies
which will be filed with the hearing officer at the
time of registration.

ti
Ms. Kelly
August 12 1987
Page 2
4. Cross examination of persons presenting testimony will
not be allowed; however, the hearing officer may ask
questions for clarification. .
5. The proceedings will remain open for a period of ten
(10) days following the hearing for additional written
arguments or statements.
INFORMATION: Additional information concerning this hearing may be
obtained by writing or calling:
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Natural Resources
& Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone: [phone]

0 SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete -items 3 and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" tpece on the revvrzo side. Failure to do Wo will P,mailt this
card from being returned to you. The return receipt fee will eravidg you the name of the�. r9.on
delivered to and the date of delivery, or additional fees the following sery cm are ava a yle. Cansult
postmaster for fees and c eck box(es) for additional service(s) requested.
1. JeShow to whom delivered, date, and addrossae's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery.
3 rArticie Addressed to: 4. Article Number /_ f ►
L Type of Service: {
Mr. David' & Linda Harris
Rau t e 2 ❑. Registered insured
Certif ied r COD
Rougemont, Nofth Carolina '27572 Express Mail
Always obtain signature of 'addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVEFfED.
5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address ( vL y if
X requested and fee paid)
6. Signature — Agent ;
X
7. Date of Delivery
PS Form 3811, Feb. ]19$ f� ►�{],p'p ti .cic►{C'DMESTIC RETILlf1RN RECEIPT`

'ES POSTAL SERVICE
UNITED STAT°
4FFICIIAL BUSINESS
SENDER -INSTRUCTIONS
Print your namsP+ address, and ZIP Code
in the space belOw.
e Complate ite Wo
s 1; 2, 3, and 4 an
the rerarm. at of article if
• Attach to fray 2WO
parmite, otftzrwiso affix to back of
article. .,R
mae
R equeated" ce
e kliCoi� aril adjant to number.
PENAL Y FOR PRIVATE
USE, OW
RETURN Qvf�Print Sender's name, address, and Z I P Code in the space below.
TO
P . 0. Box '27687
Ralei h North Carolina 27611

Speed Letter.,
To r Vl.oi.L�w�� ..From
L ! ��
subject .4 TC= �S lkPPLrG!l�T161U LOA - AU&M IT ex- AtLflA2 1►✓ IJ#A)L� CR4147
' —No 94 IQ FOLD ,
MESSAGE
!JP ` p . (`e 4.v tLe rec& i12JC Ar4ftrea1
kis coS pA
;�.��►v�+ate. Swna�I�-
4
uu lro-rne;7►-�r,
D Pam,
Date &S Signed
REPLY
' —No 'I I OLD
j
—No IOI OLD -
Date Signed
WilsonJones
GRAYUNE FORM 44-902 3-PART
t7983 • PRINTED IN U S A.
D
SENDER —DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT.

r
i

2700 Little River Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
September 3, 1987
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: P;el10 L. Teer Company's application for a mining permit for a crushed
stone quarry off Highway 57 north of Caldwell in Orange County, NC
Dear Mr. Carroll:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize my comments concerning the Nello L.
Teer quarry application listed above. I feel that the permit should be denied
at this time since portions of the information and questions required on the
application for a North Carolina mining permit have not been supplied to the
division, specifically information concerning the impacts of the proposed
quarry on ground water and neighboring wells.
At the meeting, you or one of your representatives stated that the division
had not yet received a copy of the ground water report for the quarry. If
this is the case, how can you properly evaluate the application, and was it,
in fact, complete? I and my colleagues (one a registered geologist in the
state) have had the opportunity to review a copy of the report entitled
"Ground Water Conditions--Nello L. Teer Company Proposed North Durham
Quarry, Durham and Orange Counties, North Carolina," prepared by Atlantic
Geotech Associates, Inc., Raleigh, NC, dated June 1987. The report was
supplied to Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter by the Nello L. Teer Company about a week
before the meeting. We find it contains several inconsistencies and is
lacking in several respects. I would like to offer the following comments:
1. The report is apparently based on old well data and does not
properly identify all potentially affected wells. In fact, many of
the wells listed as representative of the wells in the area are
located at points considerable distances from the proposed quarry.
A more complete picture should be given of the wells in the area
that could be potentially impacted. Some of the wells that may not

Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
September 3, 1987
Page 2
have been included in the list provided in this study are as
follows:
Arvet Carpenter
David Harris
Robert G. Honeycutt
Charles W. Collins
Lennie T. Newton
Mala Tilley
1 drilled
well
2 drilled
wells
3 drilled
wells
1 drilled
well
Number of
wells unknown
(perhaps on the study as Vernon Tilley)
Willie D. Aiken
W. R. Harris
Clifton Cameron
Darrell Ray Harris
Elry Holloway
Dorsey Clayton
Number of wells unknown
(perhaps on the study as Jack Clayton)
Gary Wicks Dug well
This list corresponds to the property owners immediately adjacent to
the proposed property boundary of the quarry. It was evident from
the comments at the public hearing that many of these have not been
contacted for information concerning their wells.
2. On page 3 of the report, the consultants state that the rocks in the
quarry area have a relatively high fracture intensity, yet they also
state that there is no developed network of connected fractures in
the area. Additionally, they state that any fractures which do
exist are "sealed," and do not act to transmit water. This is
conjecture on their part unless some pump testing is done to confirm
it. The fact that water occurs throughout the area negates the
argument against interconnected fractures.
With regard to fractures, the consultants report dominant fracture
sets trending northeast and northwest. These may be preferential
flow path directions for ground water. If the quarry intersects
major fracture sets then it may act as a "sink" for ground water
flow near the quarry. Once again, pump tests or flow modeling
should be done to evaluate the impact of the mine.
The ground water report really only addressed the impacts on the
shallowest water in the very shallow water table wells. They only
touch on deeper water -bearing zones such as the one tapped by Mr.
and Mrs. Carpenter. A more detailed analysis should be provided for
these deeper wells. A quick look at the supplied water well static
levels suggests that not all of the wells are water table; some are
semi -confined and some might even be confined. For example, well

Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
September 3, 1987
Page 3
No. 13 with a depth of 52 feet, casing to 21 feet, depth to water
15 feet. The deeper zones need to be addressed as to potential
impacts created as mining progresses. This should be done with flow
modeling based on shallow and deeper water zones. A requirement for
flow modeling is standard in many states during the permit
application process. Is this not required by the state of North
Carolina?
4. Blasting, which is designed to fracture rock in the quarry, also can
refracture the rock at areas some distance from the quarry and
disrupt the local groundwater system carried by the old fractures.
In summary, the ground water report is too shallow for assessing the
potential impacts associated with the mining. At the least the
applicants need to address the deeper water zones. Generally, in
areas of fractured rock aquifers, ground water flows in directions
controlled by the fracture orientations, and if the mine intersects
these it may dewater a large area. I feel that the division should
require flow modeling, pump testing and dye tracer studies in order
to define the ground water system in the vicinity of the quarry and
quantitate the impacts.
5. There is insufficient information provided to date to conclusively
show that the provisions of the mining act of 1971, Chapter 74-78
(1)(2), are met, namely protection of waters (specifically ground
water in the area) and protection of the environment.
I trust that you will give my comments full consideration. I would like to
request a copy of the hearing report comments.
Sincerely,
Andrew J. Miles
Department Head
Process Engineering Department
Radian Corporation
/sk
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter
Will Boettner

• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
AL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
To . + e�L� -
From:
Remarks'.
Date � ?!G(f-7 19
Y
❑
Note and
f He
❑
Note and
ratvrn to me
C]
Note and
see me about this
❑
0r yaur
approval
❑
per our
conversation
❑
Per your
request
n
Return with more details
KttitlVtL)
OCT 01198;
LAND 011A! ICY C�r�;
ACTION.
❑ Note, initial and forward
❑ Your commenis, please
❑ For your information
U i psiv reply for my signature
❑ Prepare Information for me to reply
❑ Please answer, with copy to me
To be fil

it
IMPORTANT 0
F
Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
of
Phone
AREA CODE NUMQER EXTENSION
TELEPHIED°r � PLEASE AL
L
CALLED T EE,YU
WILL CALL AGAIN
11lT T-�EE
C. 1pt, of natural Resources and Community Development

0
r
RECEI vFD
September 18, 1987 S,EP2
'87
kKQELMo4%,
-9 MONET►9 h
T0: Steve Conrad
FROM: Jim Hollowayjd
SUBJECT: Summary of Public Hearing held August 31, 1987, and written
comments submitted pursuant to NCGS 74-51 and 15 NCAC
5B .0011, on the mining permit application of Nello L. Teer
Company dated July 2, 1987.
Tom Carroll, John Holley and Tracy Davis appeared for the Division
of Land Resources.
Wayne Phears and Jim Sprinkle appeared for the applicant.
Fifty four (54) persons attended the public hearing, and there was
a request made by thirty-nine (39) persons to receive a copy of this
report. Our office is providing same by first-class mail. Attached is
a map received at the hearing from one of the speakers, and a letter
from Mr.. Andrew J. Miles, dated September 3, 1987, received subsequent
to the hearing.
Subsequent to my brief opening comments relative to the nature of
the public hearing, Tom Carroll proceeded to discuss the Mining Act,
specifically NCGS 74-51 (1)-(7), which in pertinent part reads:
"The Department may deny such permit upon finding:
(1) That any requirement of this Article or any
rule or regulation promulgated hereunder will
be violated by the proposed operation;
(2) That the operation will have unduly adverse
effects on wildlife or fresh water, estuarine,
or marine fisheries;
(3) That the operation will violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or groundwater
quality which have been promulgated by the
Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development;
(4) That the operation will constitute a substantial
physical hazard to a neighboring dwelling house,
school, church, hospital, commercial. or industrial
htiildinn_ nnhlir rnnd or nrhar ni,hlir nrnnPrrv-

r
z
(5) That the operation will have a significantly adverse
effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area;
(6) That previous experience with similar operations
indicates a substantial possibility that the
operation will result in substantial deposits
of sediment in stream beds or lakes, landslides,
or acid water pollution; or
(7) That the operator has not corrected all violations
which he may have committed under any prior
permit and which resulted in,
a. Revocation of his permit,
b. Forfeiture of part or all of his bond or
other security,
c. Conviction of a misdemeanor under G.S. 74-64, or
d. Any other court order issued under G.S. 74--64.
In the absence of any such findings, a permit shall be
granted."
Thereafter, Mr. Phears briefly outlined the applicant's proposal.
Mr. Phears and Mr. Sprinkle also took questions during the public
hearing. Seven (7) persons were afforded an on_nortunity, per their
request, to state the nature of their concerns or objections at the
public hearing. The primary concerns or objections are as follows:
I. Groundwater
Much concern was raised over the adverse impact this operation
might have on groundwater tables and wells. Statement in the
application that there were no existing wells within 600' of the
proposed operation was questioned. The study by Atlantic Geotech
Associates, Inc. dated June 1987, done at the request of applicant, was
stated to be not comprehensive. (See attached letter of Mr. Miles'
dated September 3, 1987, for a listing of wells he believes were not
included in the aforementioned study.) it was submitted that the
applicant should at least be required to establish monitoring wells.
Applicant's contention that the underlying rock fractures were "sealed"
and did not act to transmit water was questioned. It was further
submitted that if the quarry intersects major fracture sets that it may
act as a "sink" for groundwater flow in the vicinity of the quarry.
Question was raised as to available remedies in the event the
groundwater table was in fact lowered. The above -mentioned study was
stated to be erroneous relative to flow direction, and abundance of,
groundwater.
II. Blasting
One speaker commented that blasting reverberations could be
detected up to two miles from applicant's existing Eno Quarry (Durham
County). An adjoining landowner expressed concern over the stability of
his foundation. Question was raised as to the anticipated frequency of

3
the blasting. (Mr. Phears indicated that blasting would be anticipated
two or three times per week, depending on market conditions.)
1I1. Air Quality/Dust/Health
A speaker, who is a respiratory therapist, wondered if any thought
had been given to the possibility of cancer -causing agents being
released by the ground -breaking, blasting and related. Question was
raised as to what water source applicant intended to utilize for dust
control. (Mr. Phears indicated that on -site rainfall., not water taken
from the stream, would be utilized for this purpose.)
IV. Inspections
One speaker contended that the operation should have an on -site
inspector as opposed to the usual practice of periodic inspections. In
response to a related question concerning the frequency of inspections,
it was noted by staff that they anticipated the site would be inspected
as often as once per week during the initial construction phase (1988)
and approximately twice per year subsequent to it being operational.
(The law requires at least one inspection per year.)
V. Sedimentation
One speaker commented that mining inevitably led to off -site
sedimentation which, in turn, inevitably led to degradation of surface
water. It was stated that this proposed operation was upstream of the
Little River Reservoir (a $30 million drinking water source) and within
the Falls of the Neuse River Basin. It was further submitted that the
approval
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f this
J _ operation
- _ _ _ _ t J _ _ _ would
_ .. l d set
t _ bad
] precedent
_ _ _ _ � _ __ � for
_ _ other
1 _ _ _ . T.
cippLUVcll vl [,u1s �perailvu wvulu 5e� a aau pre�euelll: L�r ���eer Heavy
industrial development in this area, which would further degrade the
watershed by increasing impervious surfaces and the like.
Vi Miscellaneous
Question was also had, or concern raised, over the following:
quality of the water held in on -site retention ponds as well as the
volume or capacity of same; whether applicant has any outstanding [NCGS
74-51(7)] violations at any other sites; and what would be done to
prevent inadvertent access to the site.
The hearing adjourned at approximately 9:00 p.m.

2700 Little River Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
September 3, 1987
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Natural: Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Nello L. Teer Company's application for a mining permit for a crushed
stone quarry off Highway 57 north of Caldwell in Orange County, NC
Dear Mr. Carroll:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize my comments concerning the Nello L.
Teer quarry application listed above. I feel that the permit should be denied
at this time since portions of the information and questions required on the
application for a North Carolina mining permit have not been supplied to the
division, specifically information concerning the impacts of the proposed
quarry on ground water and neighboring wells.
At the meeting, you or one of your representatives stated that the division
had not yet received a copy of the ground water report for the quarry. If
this is the case, how can you properly evaluate the application, and was Tt,
in fact, complete? I and my colleagues (one a registered geologist in the
state) have had the opportunity to review a copy of the report entitled
"Ground Water Conditions--Nello L. Teer Company Proposed North Durham
Quarry, Durham and Orange Counties, North Carolina," prepared by Atlantic
Geotech Associates, Inc., Raleigh, NC, dated June 1987. The report was
supplied to Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter by the Nello L. Teer Company about a week
before the meeting. We find it contains several inconsistencies and is
lacking in several respects. I would like to offer the following comments:
1. The report is apparently based on old well data and does not
properly identify all potentially affected wells. In fact, many of
the wells listed as representative of the wells in the area are
located at points considerable distances from the proposed quarry.
A more complete picture should be given of the wells in the area
that could be potentially jmpacted. Some,of the well.s,,,that,may,;.,not,,,,—...,. .. �.n

UAW ,
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
September 3, 1987
Rage 2
have been included in the list provided in this study are as
follows:
Arvet Carpenter
David Harris
Robert G. Honeycutt
Charles W. Collins
Lennie T. Newton
Mala Tilley
1 drilled well
2 drilled wells
3 drilled wells
I drilled well
Number of wells unknown
(perhaps on the study as Vernon Tilley)
Willie D. Aiken
W. R. Harris
Clifton Cameron
Darrell Ray Harris
Elry Holloway
Dorsey Clayton
Number of wells unknown
(perhaps on the study as Jack Clayton)
Gary Wicks Dug well
This list corresponds to the property owners immediately adjacent to
the proposed property boundary of the quarry. It was evident from
the comments at the public hearing that many of these have not been
contacted for information concerning their wells.
2. On page 3 of the report, the consultants state that the rocks in the
quarry area have a relatively high fracture intensity, yet they also
state that there is no developed network of connected fractures in
the area. Additionally, they state that any fractures which do
exist are "sealed," and do not act to transmit water. This is
conjecture on their part unless some pump testing is done to confirm
it. The fact that water occurs throughout the area negates the
argument against interconnected fractures.
With regard to fractures, the consultants report dominant fracture
sets trending northeast and northwest. These may be preferential
flow path directions for ground water. If the quarry intersects
major fracture sets then it may act as a "sink" for ground water
flow near the quarry. Once again, rni- tests or flow modeling
should be done to evaluate the impact of the mine.
The ground water report really only addressed the impacts on the
shallowest water in the very shallow water table wells. They only
touch on deeper water -bearing zones such as the one tapped by Mr.
and Mrs. Carpenter. A more detailed analysis should be provided for
these deeper wells. A quick look at the supplied water well static„A
1 evel s -suggests that not all' of the wells are water table; some are
semi -confined and some miaht oven be confined, for example, well

Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
September 3, 1987
Page 3
No. 13 with a depth of 52 feet, casing to 21 feet, depth to water
15 feet. The deeper zones need to be addressed as to potential
impacts created as mining progresses. This should be done with flow
modeling based on shallow and deeper water zones. A requirement for
flow modeling is standard in many states during the permit
application proc-ss. Is this not required by the state of North
Carolina?
4. Blasting, which is designed to fracture rock in the quarry, also can
refracture the rock at areas some distance from the quarry and
disrupt the local groundwater system carried by the old fractures.
In summary, the ground water report is too shallow for assessing the
potential impacts associated with the mining. At the least the
applicants need to address the deeper water zones. Generally, in
areas of fractured rock aquifers, ground water flows in directions
controlled by the fracture orientations, and if the mine intersects
these it may dewater a large area. I feel that the division should
require flow modeling, pump testing and dye tracer studies in order
to define the ground water system in the vicinity of the quarry and
quantitate the impacts.
5. There is insufficient information provided to date to conclusively
show that the provisions of the mining act of 1971, Chapter 74-78
(1)(2), are met, namely protection of waters (specifically ground
water in the area) and protection of the environment.
I trust that you will give my comments full consideration. I would like to
request a copy of the hearing report comments.
Sincerely,
Andrew J. Miles
Department dead
Process Engineering Department
Radian Corporation
/sk
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter
Will Boettner

p E COUNTY
P
• ... 1fi00— � � _ _ W 1604 /f03 16C6 r 1Np � ,
Lyndover a� p0 MT 471 1471 1607 a
fl c 1to. 160
Red w I
_ 1 1.I)1 1414 Mountain
184� r60R tT Q
Rougemont 6 N lirnpton
I l4 73 N G40 ' , N�{ser
z
qL TAT:E y �6d1ff1tA1Y r47P C '
NATIO
GUARD
RD 147P + .•. �. p r '
PCO`� 1469 o UNIVE IS Y".1611 r603 ^ 1 7 1 r wo RANGE
612 AREA
QRES
r4 rp T 6
V 1 p Quail Roost 60 1616 I .
y0 1468
tQ r10u 1610
roKFERRp1�E 16os b l !or
4f6 1465 ��� 1 SI P` RA E
SDI 16r1 f6 WLI
n
146: 1466 Ikei^
HOAKINS 1466 R4' `
1464 r...• 1607 S G ~
p 1615 1622
a�t%�' RD. f f,1616 I Z
1463 1461 QO10 ' aD 1616 l6P0 16 O
1617 Bahama o a Q V
fwoy1461 b 4M► 160 W 1LE, wAM
f Q g►� 1616 MAr{6U� N .
r LLJ
f RD- 1615 2! . •i672 m I a
j+J IJ' ►gyrd, v 4 rid S Rd,s f6 o v 4 Q
1 `' N6P i1OMfr ��! �1b2/ 1619 r6P6 W vh V F
1 6 1463 . c1 I LA
1003 Willard 'Ile 1624 �.
1461
i 1460 yG 167! a Phi 1615 ! m
Facto
O �pSpN CDR SDI 16P4 P� O� P D :•
V f00z 4 DP�11O 113P J J
1459 hunt
145, f c sk0 ? 1433 Ns3 4 fib M Fairnt0
MILL 0 Z '
a
1v�r 1 B 1003 y 1706 y� n
+ 1\fps r 13 4 a r 16 R l'3
1tEt 1N OR. j c GOOD R�` R0
•r640 is iD04
143J NL 'Q�. 143! R0
1639 t
LATTI
'�M5��1449 RC ry
61 3
1449
i •leuy �53G 1704 „AM, 45►1 tl
✓✓ o ! 1635 1637
1�76 FDA, rf ` �
164 NEBRON RD. 16 34 ,.1
Q IjI
� r 1404
164 Weaver �" ; 1671 e F
1670
164 U ti 7663 � r � C''� �► � i
rS13 141/B I1 a' � °� ✓ 1657 / B51 5ro6.
I r IJy 10, �o C
�• 4'. 1
4
07 ' De Rs I, �Or�ar1
FiuCklet)er J. �._/A 165f �1 -•— 1636 16T5 Pl' x
Sprin y 163?� - ;?~y. Bison o 111^• �1�
ti-11• _ 1660 �c1uc ! c;y�/,'.�/ 1/6771
w
6U1
• - .ut

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Jaynes G, Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary September 9, 1987 Director
Mrs. Elizabeth Carpenter
Route 3, Box 70A
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
RE: Nello L. Teer's Proposed Crushed Stone Quarry
Orange County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Carpenter:
Thank you for your letter of September 3, 1987 concerning Nello L. Teer's
proposed crushed stone quarry in Orange County. The concerns expressed in your
letters certainly deserve evaluation. Before a decision to grant or deny the
permit is made, these concerns as well as any other concerns within the
jurisdiction of G.S. 74-51 of the Mining Act of 1971 will be carefully
considered. During the application review, site inspections will be made. and
comments from other agencies concerning potential impact to wells will be
sought.
I have not as yet received a copy of Nello L. Teer's groundwater report.
We will carefully review this and any other materials that may be submitted to
the Department by the applicant to insure that such information is reflective of
the conditions in your area.
Again, thank you for your interest in this matter. I assure you that a
careful review will be made before granting or denying this application.
very truly yours,
YS
E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
TF..r./TFn laI
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
P.O. Box 27687, Raicigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Tekphorrc 919-733-3833
An Equal Opportunity Affirmadw Action Empk yt

y
A
r
do
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Sectd)on Division of Land
Dept, of Nattral Resources & Community
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Dear Mr. Carroll :
Rt. 3, Box 70A, Bunnv Rd.
Rougemont, N. C. 27572
Sept. 3, 1987
Resources
Development
Re: Nello L. Teer Company's
application for a mining permit
for a crushed stone quarry off
Highway 57 north of Caldwell in
Orange County, North Carolina
At the meeting in Hillsborough on August 31, 1987 the spokesman for the
Nello L. Teer Co. stated that the majority of the wells in the proposed
quarry were dug swells and so would not be affected by mining because
they are supplied by rain water. That is not correct. Nearly all of us
have drilled wells. I have verified this by calling neighbors this week.
I would like for you to see some more current water studies before a
mining permit is issued. The map which Nello L. Teer Co. gave me shows
very few of the existing houses and wells. The well studies which are
listed in their water studies are all more than a mile from the Teer
project while those on properties adjacent to the Teer project are not
listed. The drilled wells listed are on Highway 501 and on Poole Road
right off Highway 501. The slug wells listed in their study are very
hard to identify because they are identified by names of property own-
ers of many ,years ago. Most people up here do not know who owned their
property twenty or more years ago. We had the same kind of identity
proplem with the boundaries listed for the area of Durham County they
are requesting rezoning for.
Mr. Sprinkly of the Nello L. Teer Company has told me tha2t they plan to
study each well on the adjacent properties. Thisis a settled residen-
tial cn_mmuni ty wi th many recentl V huilt horses and all of us are depend-
ent on our wells.
We do appreciate your having a public meeting so that questions could
be brought out. I can see why you are going to have to issue a permit
regardless of public opinion but I would like very much for the water
questions to be cleared up before the permit is issued.
Yours very truly,
(Mrs.) Elizabeth Carpenter

.� F
1
.�
�.
e
i
., y / °
.
�+
fa
`.
�K'
•.��-

September 18, 1987
MFMOR A unT nor
TO: Steve Conrad
FROM: Jim Holloway
SUBJECT: Summary of Public Hearing held August 31, 1987, and written
comments submitted pursuant to NCGS 74-51 and 15 NCAC
5B .0011, on the mining permit application of Nello L. Teer
Company dated July 2, 1987.
Tom Carroll, John Holley and Tracy Davis appeared for the Division
of Land Resources.
Wayne Phears and Jim Sprinkle appeared for the applicant.
Fifty four (54) persons attended the public hearing, and there was
a request made by thirty-nine (39) persons to receive a copy of this
report. Our office is providing same by first-class mail. Attached is
a map received at the hearing from one of the speakers, and a letter
from Mr. Andrew J. Miles, dated September 3, 1987, received subsequent
to the hearing.
Subsequent to my brief opening comments relative to the nature of
the public hearing, Tom Carroll proceeded to discuss the Mining Act,
specifically NCGS 74-51 (1)-(7), which in pertinent part reads:
"The Department may deny such permit upon finding:
(1) That any requirement of this Article or any
rule or regulation promulgated hereunder will
be violated by the proposed operation;
(2) That the operation will have unduly adverse
effects on wildlife or fresh water, estuarine,
or marine fisheries;
(3) That the operation will violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or groundwater
quality which have been promulgated by the
Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development;
(4) That the operation will constitute a substantial
physical hazard to a neighboring dwelling house,
school, church, hospital, commercial or industrial
building, public road or other public property;

2
(5) That the operation will have a significantly adverse
effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
rorest or recreation area;
(6) That previous experience with similar operations
indicates a substantial possibility that the
operation will result in substantial deposits
of sediment in stream beds or lakes, landslides,
or acid water pollution; or
(7) That the operator has not corrected all violations
which he may have committed under any prior
permit and which resulted in,
a. Kevocation of his permit,
b. Forfeiture of part or all of his bond or
other security,
c. Conviction of a misdemeanor under G.S. 74-64, or
d. Any other court order issued under G.S. 74-64.
In the absence of any such findings, a permit shall be
granted."
Thereafter, Mr. Phears briefly outlined the applicant's proposal.
Mr. Phears and Mr. Sprinkle also took questions during the public
hearing. Seven (7) persons were afforded an opportunity, per their
request, to state the nature of their concerns or objections at the
public hearing. The primary concerns or objections are as follows:
I. Groundwater
Much concern was raised over the adverse impact this operation
might have on groundwater tables and wells. Statement in the
application that there were no existing wells within 600' of the
proposed operation was questioned. The study by Atlantic Geotech
Associates,,Inc.:dated-June 1987, done at the request of applicant, was
stated to be not comprehensive. (See attached letter of Mr. Miles'
dated September 3, 1987, for a listing of wells he believes were not
included in the aforementioned study.) It was submitted that the
applicant should at least be required to establish monitoring wells.
Applicant's contention that the underlying rock fractures were "sealed"
and did not act to transmit water was questioned. It was further
submitted that if the quarry intersects major fracture sets that it may
act as a "sink" for groundwater flow in the vicinity of the quarry.
Question was raised as to available remedies in the event the
groundwater table was in fact lowered. The above -mentioned study was
stated to be erroneous relative to flow direction, and abundance of,
groundwater.
II. Blasting
One speaker commented that blasting reverberations could -be
detected up to two miles from applicant's existing Eno Quarry (Durham
County). An adjoining landowner expressed concern over the stability of
his foundation. Question was raised as to the anticipated frequency of

3
the blasting. (Mr. Phears indicated that blasting would be anticipated
two or three times per week, depending on market conditions.)
III. Air Quality/Dust/Health
A speaker, who is a respiratory therapist, wondered if any thought
had been given to the possibility of cancer -causing agents being
released by the ground -breaking, blasting and related. Question was
raised as to what water source applicant intended to utilize for dust
control. (Mr. Phears indicated that on -site rainfall, not water taken
from the stream, would be utilized for this purpose.)
IV. Inspections
One speaker contended that the operation should have an on -site
inspector as opposed to the usual practice of periodic inspections. In
response to a related question concerning the frequency of inspections,
it was noted by staff that they anticipated the site would be inspected
as often as once per week during the initial construction phase (1988)
and approximately twice per year subsequent to it being operational.
(The law requires at least one inspection per year.)
V. Sedimentation
One speaker commented that mining inevitably led to off -site
sedimentation which, in turn, inevitably led to degradation of surface
water. It was stated that this proposed operation was upstream of the
Little River Reservoir (a $30 million drinking water source) and within
the FallsAof the Neuse River Basin, It was further submitted that the
approval of this operation would set a bad precedent for other heavy
industrial development in this area, which would further degrade the
watershed by increasing impervious surfaces and the like.
V1 1'l- sce"aneous
Question was also had, or concern raised, over the following:
quality of the water held in on -site retention ponds as well as the
volume or capacity of same; whether applicant has any outstanding [NCGS
74-51(7)1 violations at any other sites; and what would be done to
prevent inadvertent access to the site.
The hearing adjourned at approximately 9:00 p.m.

MEMORANDUM August 10, 1987
TO: Tom Carroll, Mining Specialist
FROM." John Holley, Regional Engin . '
SUBJECT: Preliminary Review
North Orange Quarry '
. Nello Teer _
..
h l preliminary, i f t We have completed our pre minar�.rev review o he subject application and' have
the following comments: '
I. Theapplication app cation itself appears complete.
. Although the proposed long term sediment -pond appears satisfactory, the
use of -silt fencing to the extent shown is not appropriate during the
critical initial stages of the proposedsite develooment' Further, the
. construction sequence indicates that*the 'pond will not be constructed
during the initial activity. Silt fences must be replaced by properly'
designed gravel & rip -rap filter basins Where concentrated flow is .
anticipated (ie°'belom the proposed dam construction and visual barrier
berms). The proposed sediment basin should be worked into the initial
land-distur'bing activity. '
3. Whatwill be done to control sediment from the pit opening?
4. Ground cover provisions appear acceptable.
`
5. The discharge. from the pond's emergency spillway must be addressed
beyond the proposed apron on theabutment slope.
If there are any questions, please advise. '
'
,
JLH
In
o

,':�i'•.
�'rTl
id. L. , _ _ ,.:
-t
}, 1 _
•.LI F�1 _�� _ ,i pl—,
.. 1�'ur r 1' M{- .
i,•
^at. 'r
r ..y.
r i' �!�_ _�
r'; L:I k',
.., `�•
, ..v,. f i:. 7L.,<c.� 'L��r'
-.r rcj L� r`• •� ��3'.'r, F. �
,.
.'',
a!� Y
:' .GIs 'i i!r ,
.cJ
i.. r»
;TF.1: �!•. s i !L'
'i <- _' `•!, .. .._ „1 '}
.
,, _ I ,
�Y•,•.'rrfls.fir; �.
, s,
� � -,
_ :_I•'a; + '1�1 _,�' ,I C.r
? :.'�':.. ..,.. „ w _
: �
i •: t,y
•.3 =�..
_r_ tYf� ...
�, l
.1_
,-, r1:• ' �I
.. I", `AS'.1 •'r 1 1
_
r.
. jr. Itr..
`f`'
1 ..
ti•4. ,'ry-: r .} •� ci.,i
3'E
.a i' i�i+.l
..
'• �7
.. .111_ {.{.� .:7 r_F_r.
L +-Ne'7t •,.1 '..
•
'f'. li ',r',[l
.,
,s..,. r ..
LP=ii1 ... � i f t _
[ •. {i!C'•.i�' ..
i
-
aA
'•,;.+-.�•t �t- ,t'r
,
-� '°ICI „r'�'r
L.}",
•r sr., [ r '1' , ] ..
[ ,t{..F .h .t. ••s i'`. -. _ _.
, i..
•
`J'" . _
, .,i... - ij lt� t. il l, 3 i�=
'.., ,- . ...,: .f ,�LJ� '.
... ,
-
V P',f S•a '-'r
i k TAT
l
'� I .[
' F

1.
`lr y, 1(�
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land RLsources
512 North Salisbury Street • Ralcigh, North Grolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
August 13, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Holloway //
FROM: Steve Conrad S(�C
SUBJECT: Public Hearing in Mining Permit Application
Nello Teer Company -- North Orange Quarry
August 31, 1987, 7:00 pm, Orange County Court House
It is requested that you conduct a public hearing regarding the subject
mining permit application. Attached is a copy of the public notice that will be
published in local newspapers.
Please coordinate with Tom Carroll. He will provide you a copy of the
permit application.
Thank you.
SGC/sl
Attachment
cc: John Stuart
Charles Gardner
�om
John Holley
P.O. K4x 276 7, Itaki},di, North Cardina 27011-7697 Tek-Olonc 919-7.13.3833
An Dual Opportunity Affirmative Action Lmrylcryrr

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development concerning the
Nello L. Teer Company's application for a mining permit for a crushed stone
quarry off 'Highway 51 north of Caldwell in Orange County, North Carolina.
AUTHORITY: N.C.G.S. 74-51 and N.C.A.C. Title 15, Chapter 5
Subchapter 5B, Section .0011.
PLACE; TIME, DATE: August 31, 1987
7:00 P.M.
Orange County Courthouse
Superior Courtroom
PURPOSE: To receive comment related to the application for a mining
permit for a crushed stone quarry located east of North
Carolina Highway 57 approximately 5 miles northeast of
Caldwell in Orange County.
COMMENT PROCEDURE: All persons interested in this matter are invited to attend.
The hearing will be conducted in the following manner:
1. Explanation of the permit procedures as set forth in
The Mining Act of 1971 by the Division of Land
Resources, Land Quality Section.
2. Explanation of the action for which a permit is
required -by applicant. (Optional)
3. Public Comment - Comments, statements, data, and other
information may be submitted in writing prior to or
duing the hearing or may be presented orally at the
hearing. Persons desiring to speak will indicate this
intent at the time of registration at the hearing. So
that all persons desiring to speak may do so, lengthy
statements may be limited at the discretion of the
hearing officer. Oral presentations which exceed three
minutes must be accompanied by three (3) written copies
which will be filed with the hearing officer at the
time of registration.

�Y
Ms. Kelly
August 12 1987
Page 2
4. Cross examination of persons presenting testimony will
not be allowed; however, the hearing officer may ask
questions for clarification.
5. The proceedings will remain open for a period of ten
(10) days following the hearing for additional written
arguments or statements.
INFORMATION: Additional information concerning this hearing may be
obtained by writing or calling:
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Natural Resources
& Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone: [phone]

EIDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, find cdnplete horns 3 and 4.
Put youraddress in the "RETU RN. TO" gme on the ranee aide. FellurO to do this W111 prWM this
-, card from" being retur'rted to you. The return revel t fee wlll jRrovlde_ you the narna of th0 pew
deIIvered:to and the date of deIhre or add itionaI rasa the IN ioM N serAm are avaiia e. Consttl�t
postmaster- or fees and e6 k u6-Mes) for additional serviceW-requested. .
1, sovrr drr delretd, ate, arrd adres's W. , . 1 Ream D".
. Article Addressed to: 4. Article11u r_
Mr. Arveht.N..& Elizabeth Car2ent
618 Colgate'e UE
Dar am, North Carolina 27704.
a. SignatUre - Addressee
x
. Signature — Agent
x
7. Date of Delivery
Type of Service:
0
. dd ssee's A res
r,�.kked and feep
�
Insured
D
addressee or
IE D•
i
PS Form 3871, Feb. 1986 ��/���� �1 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTALSERVICE-0—
OFFICIAL
ENDER INSTRUCTIONSss- �
Print your nama, addra, and ZIP Coe!
in the space below.
• Complete Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on r
h a ravem.
9 Attach to front of article if space 1.00
permi#s, otherwise affix to back -of
article.
0 Endome articla "'Return Receipt
Requested" adjacent to number.
LLSMA1L
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE, $300
fiLETURN Print Sender's name, address, andZIP-Code in the space below.
ED
Mr. Thom rroll - Land Quality
1*7P.O. Box 27687
L�v S[�%W
Q00k Raleigh, Forth Caroline 2.7611

SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items and 4, .
Put V our address in the "'RETURN TD" space on the reverse sine. FaiWre to do this wi11,prevent this
card f rorn being returned to your. The return recei t fee uvili R ro►ride ou the name of the person
delivered to and the date of deIiver . For additional fees the f oIlowing services are available. Consult
postmaster for fees and the box (es) for additional seryice (s) requested. `' � .r � f
1. how to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery..
. Article Addressed to: :' Article Number
:24qqtt&5zl
Type: of Service:
Mr. Mason Dorothy Da .,,Jr.
Registered Insured
P.O. Box 4 Certified COD
South Boston,,' Va. Express MaiI
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent.and'DATE DELIVERED.
5. signature — Addressee 8 Z84dd`re� se 's; ddr ss i
. sig re —F Agent
?or. Date of Del ivHrm
PS Form { 1 �', L A,, �A&)tj/2ipPOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES P0STAL" SEl11'I
OFFICIAL BUSINESS ,�_
M
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print you name, address, and Z I jrgdo ,4 � T i r 3
in the Space below. r •,,, "
0 Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
the "www. Nk
e Attach to front of article if space+
perynim otherwise affix to back o
article.
0 Endorn article "Return Recoipt
Requested" adjectt to number.
w*rt i' • Yr�Y "S�
PENALTY -FOR PRIVATE
USE. $300
Print Sender's name. address, and Z I Code in the space below.
omas 1E, Carrol I(Lip
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
PENALTY -FOR PRIVATE
USE. $300
Print Sender's name. address, and Z I Code in the space below.
omas 1E, Carrol I(Lip
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

f
19 ENDER: Complete sterns I and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items 3 and 4.
ut your address ire the "RETU R N TO" space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
"Vard from being 'returned to you. The return re el t fee will roOida you the name of the arson
slivered to and the date of deliv�erC or a't ona fees the of owing services are ava a e. Consult
*postmaster or ees and check box(es) for additional service(s) rtquested.
-1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressea`s address. � . 0 Restricud Delbmry.
3. Article Addressed to:
4. Article Number -
Mr. Raymond B. S., Ila Woodlief
Type of Service:
Rt. , fox 211 0.•
Registered Insured
ug'emo t , N.C. 27572
Certified DAD
Express Mail
Always obtain signature of addressee or
12,r74Cagent
and DATE DELIVERED.
. Signature — Addresse6e
. Addressee's Address Y if
requested and fee paid)
b. Signature -- Agent
X
4.
7. DaPpf Dei i er -e
r
PS �ofrr�.38f1, Feb.�19�C��[,Q,('n �QjV�(nQ�fl���i2.�j����I�lESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
ENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your name, address, and Z I P Code
in the space below.
• complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
the revarse.
• Attach to front of article if space
permits, otherwise affix to hack o
article.
• Endorso article "Return Receipt
Requested" adjace nt to number.
oar
Cv
0
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE. 63M
Print -Sender's name. address, and ZIP Code to the space below.
P. , Box
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

40 SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and cornpim Items 3 and 4.
Put your address in the "RETU R N T "space on the reverse side. Faliure to do this will pnt this
card from being returned to you. The mtum tpII22will gnwiftlou the ram of the
delivered to and the date of delivecy. For additional toes the following services are milable. Consult
postmaster for fees and check box (es) for additional service(s) requested.
1. W Show to whom delivered, date, and addressees address. 2', ❑ Restricted Delivery.
. Article Addressed to: 14. Article Number
Mr. 1 r r. Peggy S. Holloway
Rt. i, Box 238A
Bahama, North Carolina 27503
. Signature — Addressee
ignature — Agent
MILeA
7'Dkd of Delivery
PS Form 381 J , rr . f (
Type of
RegisWre
Certified
Express Mall
Inured
COD
Always obtain signature of addressee or
,agent and DATE DELIVERED.
O*v\A, ! ddrs.,Se
r cyst
2 f
"a-000-1
's Address (ONL Y i
and fee paid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your soma, address, and ZIP Code
in the speoo below.
* Complete items 1; 2, , and 4 on
the ryas.
• AtWh to frost of article if space
Perm hs, otherwise affix to back of
article.
* Endorse article "Roturn Recefpt
quested" adjawnt to number.
RETURN
T
PENALTY FOR PRIMATE
USE, 300
Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below.
1:1 . . Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

AW SENDER- ornpiete items land 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items end' .
Put your address in the „RETURN TO"' space on the rvwerse side. Failure to do t ls-wiJI prevent this
card from being returned to you. The return receipt fee will proviog Vou the name of the pgmon ,
delivered to and the date of delive . For additional fees the following services are evalfable, Consult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional service(s) reques vd.
1. Show to whore delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery.
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
Mr. Ewart B . Rogers Type of Service:
Route . Regimrod Insured
Rougemont, North Carolina' Certified coo
Express Mail
Alwayo obta0 sigmture of eddmme or
agent arrd DATE DE LIVE RIF D.
b. Signature -- Addressee 8 , Addmsseers Address if
qp requested and fee paid)
x J-3
. Signature 7, Agent
7. Det of Delivery
PS Form F,1�Fjpj)1� oQ� ��� C,� U��+���� DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
ENDER INSTRUCTIONS
ION
Print your nam a, address, and Z I P Coda
in the space below.
o Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
th o r"am.
• Attach to front of article if space
pormIts, otharwise affix to back of
article.
a Ender article "Return Receipt
Requestodx' adjacent to number.
RETURN �1!
TO
PENOkLTY FOR PRIVATE
USE. 300
Prig Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below.
P.O. Box 277
Raleigh,, North Carolina 27687

40 ENDER: Complete items 1 .and 2 when addition'aI services are desired, and complete !terns 3 and 4.
Put you r address in the "R ETU RN To" space on the reve' ise, side. Failu re to do this w4li prevent this
card from being returned to you ., The return recei t fee wild e rovide you the name of t h a persw
delhiered to and the date of deliver . For addlitional fees the ollo ing services are available. Consult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additi real,service(s) requested.
1. Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee' ,address. 2. El Restricted Deliverer.
. Article Addressed to:
Mr. . Dorsey & ChrisotineM. Clayton
t . 5, Box 84
Hamlin Road
Durham, North Carolina 27704
M
. Signature+..=-- Agek
t+ �t+�� j t � • t
I
f
7. Date Of r,7
PS Form�$ 1Feb . � /7 3
4. Article Number
22?�
21 o/r-
Type of Service
❑ Registered Insured
KCertified COD
rExpress Mail
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
. Addressee's Address if
requested and fee paid)
C� �OMESTJC RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER I NSTRU TIC S
'
Print your name, address, and ZIP C ' e
In the space below.
• Complete Items 1, 2,3, and 4 on
the reuarse.
• Attach to front of article if space `.
permilu, otherwise affix to back o
aNrticle.
*Endorse article "Return Receipt
Requested" adjacent to number.
00 �4',
* ,
U. .I AIL
14
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
U SE. S300
Print Sender's name, address, and Z I Gode try the space below.
Mir. Yhoma E. -Ca`r oll i Lard Quality
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
-W�4

49 ENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional service3 are desired, and coirpkrte items 3 and 4.
4
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" space on the reverse side. Failure to do this wilt prevent this
card from being returned to you. The return receipt fee will jRrovide you the name of the person
delivered to and the date of deli,/e . For additions fees the following services are available. Consult
postmaster or fees and check boxes) for additional ser► ica(s) requested.
1. 8S Shover to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. D Restric ed Delivery.
. Article Addressed to
Chief Adminisrati-%re'Officer
Kenneth RO.Thompson, Co r,It . Mgr.
f 106 W. Margaret. Lane
Hillsborough, N.C. 27278
5. sigp�tture —Addressee
a. signature — gen
x
7. Date of Deliver
4. Article Cumber
"_0 Qoo�
Type of Service
Registered
artified
Express Mail
Invired
COD
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
S. Addressee's Address (ONL. Y i
requested and ,fee paid)
PS Farm ,t11 FA b I n h 1)�1U., "XCM�E T1 RETURN RECEIPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your name, address, and Z l P Code
in the space below.
* Cam plate items 1, 2, S, and 4 on
the revarse.
e Attach to front of article if space
permhs, otherwise affix to back of
article.
Endow article "Return Rocoipt
Requested" adjnent to number.
�t�YCl�F�i1�
TO � o
4
�OR
-G �� ,d.o. Box 27687
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
LIE. S30D
Print Sender's name, address, and Z I Code ire the space below.
r. Thomas E. Carroll - Lard Quality
�'Raleigh, North Caroli a 27611

F
SENDER. Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4.
Put your address in the " R E TU R N TO" space on the reverse side. Failure to do this- wiII prevent this
card from being returned to you. The return re of t fee will R rovide you the name of the person
delivered to and the date of del ive . For additional fees the f oIlo ,ng services are available. Consu-It
postmaster for fees and check bo rs) for additional service(s) requested.
i
1. Shoiv to whore delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ l3fstr#cted Delivery.
. Article Addressed to:
4. Artic?e
M Albert Kittrell
hype Of Service
� t't � � �' �. L1 �1 � T , iI� �
-Las} GCL t Lane
r
� RegisteredInsured
d
Certified COD
Hi-Il b rough , N . C. 27278-Express
Mail
AWay s obtain s i g natu re of addor
k
Mt mtd DATE DE LIV ERE D
. Sig Lure — dressae
8. Addressee's Address (ONL Y if
requested and fee paid)
. atu re -- Agent
x � f
#�
7. Date of Delivery
P Form S11, 'eb. " + D �1A Ti# TLlf REI T

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
EIDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your name, address, and Z I Codia
in the space below.
• Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
tho re+ror:a.
• Attach to front of article if space
pormits, otherwise affix t of
article.
a Endorse article "
Fit
Requat &K MAI number.
PENALTY FOR PRIVATF-
USE, ` M
T% -%4M 1
RETURN Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below.
TO 6S
vv?Thomas E. Carroll - Land Qmality
P.O. fox 27687.
al it North CargJLma .27611 _�

i
M
* SENDERj�Pornplete items 1 and 2 when additiona' I services are delsi red, aiictcompIM items 3 ai d 4
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" space on#the reverse side* Feilurre torya ; Tt*Hrevent this
card from being returned to you. The return reel t fee will raWda r6u the nbf th- r n
delivered to and the date of deliverv. For d t onel fm the foll rig se rvIces are mml lable, onsult
postmaster or ees and check box(es) for additional service(s) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delhond, date{ and addrien"'s add . 02. 0 RUVCtod DelhmlrV.
. Article Addressed to:
4. Ankle Nurr
Mr. Douglas W. Hai r r i
Tvir of Seniew
314 W. Margaret I -Jane
Reglketsred Insured
'
9
Hillsborough, N . Cd'. 27278
Cenifled COD
Express Flail
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
—A else
8. Addressee's Address if
x
requested and fee pixie)
. Signature nt
x
7. Date Of Del iv
PS Form 381I/F ILAOZW)DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

k.41TE0STATE POSTAL SERVICE
} OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
rint Your n am a, addraw, and ZIP Code
a the space bolow.
a COMPlete items 1 2, S, and 4 on
the reverse.
Attach to front of article If space
Permits, otherwise affix to back of
article.
o Endorse artlola "' Raturn Racaipt
Requested" ad1acent to number.
RETURN
4
TO .�4 P
LLWMIL
w
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
U S E, $300
Print Sender# name, address, and Z I Code in the space be low
_ Mr, _Thom E. -Carrel - Lard Quality
_.-• ► •_ •
`� # - - -

jV'SE Complete items I and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items 3 and. 4.
Put your address in the "RETURN To" space on the reverse skde. Failure to do this Will pre ent this -
card from being returned to you. The return reset t fee will rovide you the name of the arson
delivered to and the date of dell IVD�t' or additional fees the following services are aval lable. Consult
postrnaster far fees and check box (es) for additional service(s) requested.
1. X Shover to whom deli red, idm, and adidnnwe's address. ,. 0 Restrlc-md Delivery,
. Artiste Addressed to: 4. Articliq Number
BruceIe�lie Deld
Type of Service.
Rt . 2,, Box 209A
u emor�t, North "Prolina 757 mkfl d HInsured
rt��f�ed D
Co Ekpnm Mail
#. Alw ys obtain signature of addressee or
agent -ad DATE DELIVERED.
. Si ature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONL Y i
req es'ted and fee paid)
. Signature — Agent
X
. Da#e of Del fiver
__j
C n 3P I?
r F%1 ��' '�� � ,�. �� DOMESTIC RETURN �EDEIPT

a
2A AUG
/98'1
,.
ask—
L
I.�. .MAI ' ' -
PENALTY, FOR PRIVATE
USE. $300
Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Cycle in the space below.
r. Thom E. -Carroll _ T_LandQuality
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your nam9, address, and Z I Code
in the space below.
0 COMPIOW items 1, 2,3, and 4 on
the reverse.
o Attach to front of article if space
permits, otherwise affix to hack of
article.
Endorse article "Return Recoipt
Requested" adjacent to number.
RETURN
T
.1. Box . -
. - � -,_ Nora_ r I1
+'p r

ENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional servlm are desired, and complete U&= 3 ate ,
Put your address in the "RETURN TO"' gme on the reverse sib. Feilure to do thIs gilt preve t,this
card from being returned to you,. T-he return receipt fee will Rrovide you the name of the person
del Iv red to and the date of del syga. For ItIonal fm the tollowing services 8re available. Consult
postmaster for ee and heck o((es) for additivnaI reryIce {s} requested.
• + y
1. 'o Shavi to whom dal Wered, date, and 's addrem 2. 0 ReWk-wd Delivery.
. Article Addressed to: 14. Article lumber
Mr. . Garr R. -& D enise Wicks
Route ,' Box 2. .
Rougemont, North Carolina
. Si ure ---- Addre ="
star Agent
. Date of Delivery
Type of Service
27572 Registered
Certif ied
Express Mail
PS Form 3811..Fe�i`� ��� q,rQ�� (y�
gInsured
COD
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
. Addressee's Address (9,YL Yi
requested and ` e aid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
M

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
OFFICIAL -BUSINESS
SENDER INSTRUCTIONS
Print your namo, address, and Z III Code
in the space below.
e Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on
the revarse.
• Attach to front of orticle if space
permits, otherwise off ix to back of
article.
e Endorse article "Return Receipt
Requested" adjacent to number.
RETURN
Y
To
PO
24 A li G
p'7
.*.
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE. 00
Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below.
Mr. . Thomas Carroll - Land Quality
����• - 1 a` P.O. Box 27681
y
Pv�'�� �C�\n� _�R�leigh, Narth Ca��,.iIIa�Z� 11

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resourccs and Community Development
Division of Livid Rculurces
512 North Salisbury Street • P�dcigdi, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, SY-crctary Director
August 13, 1987
MEMORANDUM
T0: Jim Holloway
FROM: Steve Conrad
SUBJECT: Public }searing in Mining Permit Application
Nello Teer Company - North Orange Quarry
August 31, 1987, 7:00 pm, Orange County Court House
It is requested that you conduct a public hearing regarding the subject
mining permit application. Attached is a copy of the public notice that will be
published in local newspapers.
Please coordinate with Tom Carroll. He will provide you a copy of the
permit application.
Thank you.
SGC/sl
Attachment
cc: John Stuart
Charles Gardner
Tom Carroll.
John Holley
RO. fiox 27687, RakWi, NL)Hi Camlina 27611-7647 'Ikk-r xine 919-733-3H33
An Equal C)M)rtunity Affirmative Action Fmpkrycr

Ann
J-
TO: f 4s►� {r �-^ -�
r
r '
DATE: 6 -/.Z r97-_
SUBJECT:
r North Carolina Department of Natural
r - Resources &Community Development

C
4
NELLO L. -IF EER COMPANY
rf Subsidiary of Koppers Company, /nr.
re
7 I i '-; v r 1- i
4,go► F� 0. E. C X 1 1 3 1 D U' A r 1, iN . C: U
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 57-9446
Mr. John L. Holley, Jr. P.E.
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Holley:
August 6,� V
P'p: E1i'li ?iEGIU+ti'tiZ Qi FICC
RE: Notice of Deficiency
Durham Quarry
In reference to the above -styled subject, our company personnel have
reviewed this deficiency on site at the waste area and are presently trying
to develop the proper course of action to take. However, one aspect of the
problem with which your department is probably unaware is a proposed access
road by the City of Durham, which will cross our property just east of the
existing limits of the waste area.
The Teer Company has obligated itself to build this road and will be
utilizing strippings presently stockpiled in the waste area for use as
construction fill in the embankment section of the road. I have enclosed
a blueprint of our Durham Quarry airphoto showing the approximate road
alignment for your information.
I would appreciate a meeting with you and your personnel onsite at your
earliest convenience so that we can discuss temporary erosion control measures.
Until the alignment of the easement and roadway specifications are finalized,
we cannot properly address any permanent erosion measures which will be required.
If: you have any questions, or require further assistance, please don't
hesitate to call.
JS:sj
very truly yours,
0JiNE"o-
L. T MPANY
m Spr' kle
�=OL!NOE-D 19

}, • I !v ,,,f j�W.
'K•�+y,_,..
`s ..�, � -3".1 � �,, �r "�,tKt,�'�ti�r.►+,�,R�.ci�t�fy r r'3�:':t���i✓';r Vf '1
... ,.,; d+ � t. r��r. ' !•. w ♦ •w 'h1 � It 't! �. "w'� _��{t'iS y3:j..��:LE
•3 !" ,�i . ! r'• r i YtrS r� i?•�� ? •`� �!'�ar .pca rra�•L' �•,
R 1,�� ? . �"' - t !{ `�st rr�"• `.. ae �\ `ry Ji,M�( % .'=S.r�'a•
r•• T`�Jr.'...ti �� fr" �� ' `a1 ��_�"'�} tf,� s�1.�,� ,� ,q,� ¢'� 4
Y • " asy'.. r �'-rai Y� �r .i i' 3 v'�i'r='+'
w �'f, i • s,. si. �,,,, ss.rr i �� 6.f a�4i• z
r a s , Ft�3.ti1 yd -A3"}} i'!•a Sys, x '`t`+' + tJ 47•�
}}
. tf 1r ¢� :i •si� F � ti�'.?F,' t }ti�y y�1+,�1r n� ay ��d. �>�.-4Edrv1�
'a r f � S .ri .•� ci�y�`•�, .r''•y��7� / '� � f,' `./I�_ 'r r '.�s ���'�3, �!•�.•y.
S., ' • ,.. ... S i��' � +j" �'. r- �!lr:�� a+l f�,*fit .r€y
.-_ •gy'��bj. `�:. �' •.'�f�+ i Lf: ',. � / a - i'� ,, vi,P r.��r1;� �r ��+
Frq.'�'�y'�a . ^N ,� : �>>.fi, .` � : �}r� F j It i ��' � •s rs�:' i f
4„"�`S'•�fh.l i L� �'sf ,t.. ! '� ��✓ ra � r 3,' -r.a 4� 1 �,r ro i �L,•.•'�k r ,�' -+ �
�%r�•ri , 4l�,Cr rR..r r ri .�r'r e�7 t� � '�r `,�• � 1
N�+s��Jr�r�`,'���'Cla�.s': ,�w.rM��s •• f i ..., �� �,�y�l�}`,E �`i"�„ysa''i'%�` tirS _•
�w
au"'y'iv'4kv1�c.VIM , a''. +fih xq t }4t.• 7.: t
T r-,
y} tr � `t• � 4- 3 5� ti r x~ d-ryri .7 h �97�,,y1 '1r1: ��} i�if
?WWiA.yi si - . f , t: J �". a �5- / ,tii ,;f F L •'� rYr aK'
�Y v
Y 1r + G t ....ay Mn r yE2 ,`I a;i t,� `)tA4i; "f°►a , } Trr
r [ r •� +r�'�h{,51,y.4`+y '-�s't"s•° r f4wrY� t<�` �r.�s't`s9SL`4{�3.r''.1 `4;:
' + r+ `. �,{�. ; •"r`Sr'•' a .} � a_ ;; 5���l fit, `7•�t�S>L s•. Y s iII}}F: 'Sy S:� ;Ay ."3:.
` S'#,%•- l•w ,q•`, r''iY� r��+Fy,}d
�F� r . ' 't 1 21L ri � t•i 7 - l r, i �'�!�: > ^S t..y. S rs.
'4 '-:rT• �� t r r. Jr"9 `a.f' t�7> i �+•tI1 mif +t `• 4'7s'''.r 71•a T� r a
� J 4 i �*,. C rfSr F � ji
• }�•".. •., r 1Y �'• 15 �i+ I A�''S �f �y •t•i�`t 1�x p �r GrYh 9r iC it f ! .
/ • �s `' : � R t t- 3�S '}t � 7 y � t1��11ti ��Y1% `t• }.,f"+• t..k - a. t �1, L` .,�y� }�,A r 1�7 r.+� S 1
r ��'+° r �' i.•;r a � � ,f. �s. F 5+' � �_u tie,�l<� S� "! [ r + t C �� it v a y t ��C - 5t "'I � W rf.. '•
i r' • ' !+ '" tih ,�� .y, � i� x'S%,Y h:; -, k J '�� a' .her!,, �' �.
s vnr 7 7 e4 t'• `i' r ! 'J ; �. 1 t Oi Y 'l Fa+ - •'� • �' Yk f' a� P� 7 �i iz �`\ - 'Sf ,.,:
•rr ri� i 1!,4�r6 ��:lr'*tir .•'��Y .E-, �a� � i� ,,t ,#i ; 3S71ri,•U�trfi '�yr-?► �� �. T.i
A ''y; �, a J +i , "r I.r .k h , 44 xlt i. a e r fr '�4� � �T t v •�ty.�t.
wJ .iY.y , ;as r5;t'' '"J j•i,r, 1f, j 1 f,+y�r;;ti� rrr;X f �r,aJ�r.a yy,• iJvr:.' 's
::y ; • t. r i' 7�: 1aL '' a �''. , �j r .�'� wA ' �,i1f^ �, x �� t�•`: ,a �'ti �i �5`�; '�y:
4�tiZ1� r•u '.atf..� u, ,�A.�'r v'r ;rG•�`.�fz+sL •Sr+•.,,a,.-�,�.t kr�+T�l��!.�'•'��i �ac��,,�,�}t...' f�K �� t`a�:vi
�,�.�+�r_ � ,•• 1 ;�L 6 s. y1 �, ��I��Si>trs'� 'IlIs3l�r;rn'�Y���' ,,,,r"%� t.. r rjy.`/,!•T crC��^•� � •,;�f3�� �
� r " ;' r . ♦ .4, 6 -� }..,Fgrr� 1I i -y4' ,,,,,, ,gyp'''` f C r } �i
�"{�f ,`�.i+ �n7�f`[ �r��� :s !r•,� 17'1; � f �,�f JI.L�y� : i' �rf�?r•�,1, r��t3_'. :7�, u.l-t;.r:`z�' ,, �-!s'%r
'�.' � y„ .� i i, �}j ..ii�,�.+�f F=`� �}1.- •w.� , .��-y »• r �•., � �h i•�r�rs� �''SL. � � ,•.
r � .✓r ~ ia'f ✓ ♦ra'}w r �7� •�3 �.. �. 1�r ti J r •1�V r�•. � Y�! ` ?• l.i'�� .' r
w .•i.� r!• •'. ,S+r+ .rr.Y �'•'';�', it • ;�.A" 4 y;.r�.rr• •y 4, r!. •-',`ir - �: ! lr j{rr%. A
f�, ��, , r7 y r ;� «C �,.:'i^ : i _ a e •riS.i,/rR.Y fi � � ti er.' \, �=/.S5 �� ; s .. , ��+ i` � �• �.
P 4! % � r: i► � t ' :: % r, . y �,
ryti ti Y 4.j ..�rz,r.S - 1 `1t �t f�ai.--•�.�rlt'„ " ��
.44
'�!'•i.'15��' .�. �`�v r rSF `.1,,��.� } ,�� S air'-.t�• tii'�al �� Y .yi
r"6+t R - j yS� �a \. :'�, , �' �^ .r,�� +1'ri�#'' •Nl�,i7 �i� f•'ut. Mi.- ., --Ay
..r,(•,x rt��":�.'� �1 � ��• =,l r�r` r�A. �rY ���„�,s!'.tilS�l� *,•��tl�' h,'-��4��''�' i�f"f�i,�,7a� •;�,- -w'
:j`rE.ra'.4� ''*�• .fi�7�iw loves ��x7 �s t, '$ t �,{� �„r4 F`� ,f'��1���ryTs y ti%'!, - t� i"�'•! �>!`;..
her T^�� :�,l� klz�`��� Vic`• l;r�l?p+r'•;} c•� �•i'�S7 �}�'�''xr, 1,. ,y4s Y� ��.,,s� ..�
rLY'�r � ¢"+, �r�"ds'-(� '� �if � ,r?• ,+' �t�P�� r. � {+,`H�,'�i'�' �t�� �""y_ f i,r�i��jY R3 �1:.
s :. 1 �� •2 �E`*•?. Y ,rL� tY''t i1�t ,���,. . r 4 : ' f�„h d!• � 7%s +'.
�'•.s>J:. f�';i:3.-rs•5 � ��:Ii�r�.e a�'•':f8r"Git�J•�"��1'��', .,r�:�a51��3�+�' - '',`'•��' a��.�•.�� „

IMPORTANT
To
_
Date Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
Phone
AREA CODF
NUMBER FXTENSION
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
Message
Signed
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU
URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
N. G. Deft. of NaturaS Resources and Community Development

RECEIVED
ORANGE COUNTIV
HILLSBOROUGH
NORTH CAROLINA
August 3, 1987
Mr! Steve Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Natural Asources
and Community Development
P O Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Conrad:
1WG 0 5 '87
Thank you for taking the time to discuss Nello Teer
Company's application for a mining pernit. As discussed, I
have received the Teer Company's official notice of having
filed an application with NRCD. The notice does afford
adjoining property Kners and. the Chief Administrative
Officer in the County the opportunity to request a public
hearing.
To insure ._ure the prchos .; Yt`in .i.ng operation addresses local.
environmental concerns and be Acre informed about the mining
operation, I an requesting a public hearing be held in
accordance with NRCD, Mining Re.sourc& Regulation Subchapter
5B, .0011. Advanan notification of the public hearing date
would allow tire to nraparF
Should your division require County assistance during
the application review period, &o nct neai.tate to inform :ne.
`."inc:erely,
A ert Kitt ell
Intet:im County Manager
AK/dfr

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCSES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND RESOURCES DIVISION
LAND QUALITY SECTION
TELEPHONE LOG
Sheet
Date
County
1 Call received Call placed
1. Project: { �iL�--,•tp�c co
2. Conversation with:
3. Content of conversation:
.W, ffuftc
Filled by:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND qUALITY SECTION
T E L E P HON E L O G
C. Date: 3 p
County:
Call received ( ] Call placed
Project:
Convercat:inn with:
WE �aA2 D OTHEY SA= D = .
-WHA.T—W E-:i i i "-U ED :
-z'7 2;) g
B y : 7 • �Crh,n
�cgrl4f

I''+1fJl1M
•� Pr'�i1N�:
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor July 27, 1987 Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
Mr. & Mrs. Gary Wicks
Route 2, Box 209
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
RE: Nello C. Teer Co.
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wicks:
Thank you for your brief note and request that this Department hold a
public hearing concerning the above referenced application for a mining permit.
This office has received four (4) letters from persons voicing their general
concerns over the proposed operation. Of these four, only two are from
adjoining landowners and only one, yourselves, have requested a public hearing.
In comparison to the total number of adjoining landowners and the response
the Department often receives relative to such issues, the degree of public
interest expressed to date does not warrant the expense of conducting a public
hearing.
However, representatives of this Section would be happy to meet with you
individually and review The Mining Act of 1971 and the steps taken in our review
of mining permit applications. You also would be afforded the opportunity to
express those specific concerns you have regarding the proposed North Orange
Quarry.
I attempted to telephone you with this information but the long distance
information service had no telephone number listed in your name. Because of
statutory requirements on the permit application period, please advise
immediately at [phone] should you wish to have such a meeting.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jo4mas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEC/sl
cc: Mr. John Holley
P.O &)x 27687, Raleigh, North Camlina 2761I-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C.�� artesoa.c ree.�,
T �
e rarrocn& we` o
re
e, hexer" n
u� a- �t�I �
r,
Rt z� 6aX209 NOTICE
rnc)A ,111.E . a,7Zr7Zi'12-Uant to provisions G.S. 74.50 of The Mining Act of-- 1071, notice is hereby given
that Nello L. Teer Company,. A Subsidiary of Koppers Company, Inc.. has applied
(Company Name)
on _2 July 1987 _ to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North,
(Dale)
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611 for a surface mining permit to commence mining" of
q artz diorite on 142 acres located 5 northeast of Caldwell
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Mlles) (Direction) (Nearest Town)
near road .N.C. 57 in Orange County
(Road) (Name of County)
In accordance with G.S. 74-50, the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort -to
notify all owners of record of land adjoining the proposed site, and to notify the chief administrative
officer of the county or municipality in which the site is located. The property owner may file
written comment(s) within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice to the Department at the
above address. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest exists, a public
hearing will be held in accordance with the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development; Mining, Mineral Resources Regulation Subchapter 5B, .0011.
Jul 6, 1987
(Date Mailed to Addressee)
P. 0. Box 1131
(Address of Applicant)
Durham, N_ C: 27702

4V67 CQ
Cl-V �4
1�-�,9

7i Pnx 7n A Byrn— PA
Rougemont, N. C. 27572
July 13, 1987
Land Quality Div, of Land Resources
N. C. Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Developement
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Re: Nello L. Teer Co. request for
mining permit
Gentlemen:
We have been advised, in writing, that the Aiello L. Teer Co. has
applied for a permit to commence mining of quartz diorite on 142
acres located 5 miles northeast of Caldwell near N. C. #$7.
We would like to request that you delay issuing such permit until
we can hay.e time to investigate what kind of damage we can expect
to our adjoining farm and home. We have orchards, blueberries.
several acres of vegetables, a pond, and our home to consider. Also,
T -L ali allergic to dust ardi YG 1y il l YUoe i+art direct ysi n-o for al-ly dusty
uuw
from the mining operation to be blown right across our farm.
Can you tell me where I may obtain information on how the law protects
us, our water supply, and farm ? I will appreciate any information
you can give me.
yours truly,
Arvet N. Carpenter'
Elizabeth A. Carpenter
&ILCPAa-;�

ROADWAY.
Over 550 Terminals
r
Pf
h
Ilk>
vu►tiry St,V
A
t �
k � k
SP.12a

0
July 14, 1987
NC Department of Natural Resources and
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Sertinn
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Sir,
Community Development
In answer to
a notice sent to
me, as an adjacent landowner, that Nello
L. Teer Company
a subsidiary
of Koppers Company; Inc.
has applied
for a mining
permit on 142 acres on Highway 57 Orange
County,
I would like
for this to serve
as a formal complaint that
property I
own will be
severly damaged
in quality of life and land
value.
Their notice states their nearest town to be Caldwell in as much as
the property is sitting on the Durham/Orange County line its nearest
town is Rougemont, the fastest growing area in Northern Durham
County with many planned subdivisions already in process.
Before a permit is issued I would like very much to meet with the
land quality section of the Department of Natural Resources to show
just cause as to why and how this Quarry affects my property both
present and future.
Yours Truly,
I" �PLI U-1
Peggy Holloway

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
sFC�.
NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50 of The Mining Act of 1971, notice is hereby given
that Nello L. Teer Cam an A Subsidiary of Koppers Company, Inc. has applied
(Company Name)
on 2 July_1987 to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North,
(Date)
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611 for a surface mining permit to commence mining of
%uartz_diorite on 142 acres located 5 northeast of Caldwell
(Mineral, ore) (Number) (Miles) (Direction) (Nearest Town)
near ro-nd N.C. 57 Ora^.de County_ in — -- I'—.- --
(Road) (Name of County)
In accordance with G.S. 74-50, the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to
notify all owners of record of land adjoining the proposed site, and to notify the chief administrative
officer of the county or municipality in which the site is located. The property owner may file
written comment(s) within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice to the Department at the
above address. Should the Department determine that a significant public Interest exists, a public
hearing will be held in accordance with the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development, Mining, Mineral Resources Regulation Subchapter 5B, .0011.
July 6, 1987
(Date Mailed to Addressee)
P. 0. Box 1131
(Address of Applicant)
Durham, N. C. 27702

oro
r3iaare
—
_ t �:
`1331 :io
7Chd 'r.' 0:9-
s O11V1� A3S800 ' clog
0/9
I•
ada

Project: f VCA1
Conversation with:
WE SAID
Q�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND QUALITY SECTION
T E L E P HOW E L OG
Date:
County: r
Call received f✓] Call placed
THEY S A = D
IL I
at ; r
WHAT —WE —THINK w—E A COMPLISHED:
°t✓`�� Lwv S on R 4,.r G
8
_l
[i LC4�n PJn + {

i34 NELLO TEER COKFurit% ` I+�N
LNG REQUEST
14NO
q�lTj.
� �fcr�QN
it. i
i t
i
i

Rt. 3, Box 70A
Rougemont, N.-C. 27572
Sept, 16, 1987
Mr. Thomas E. Carroll
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Dept, of Natural Resources and Community Development
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
Re: Nello L. Teer's Proposed Crushed Stone Quarry
Orange County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Carroll:
I had already mailed you my comments on the meeting in Eillsborough
but I thought perhaps you would like to have this map t.o go with
them. I have marked the houses between U. S. 501 and the Orange
County line on Poole Rd., Cothran Rd., Chambers Rd., and Bacon Rd,
( or st, Rd. #1471) so that you can get a better idea of how many
homes and how many wells will be impacted by a quarry.
These homes are in Durham County and only two of the other land-
owners besides ourselves have farms that extend into Orange County
but I don't think damage to wells will stop at a county line so these
homes are important to ,your decision.
Yours truly,
" A
W"lowm--aw
(mrs,) Elizabeth Carpenter
Z7_hlel. ; JV-!p DvAlil" (folihi7Y AAt-/9 Nr/7,e)
Awi-kb TcG2, i'l�vpvs�,I ,f;rdr,

114
State of North Carolina Io
Department of Natural Resources & Ccnminity Development
Division of Larry Resources
Land Quality Section
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
North Carolina General Statutes 74-55 and the Mining Regulations require that
"The mine operator shall, by February 1 of each year during the life of the
permitted operation, and within 30 days of campletion or termination of mining
on an area under permit, file with the Department a mining reclamation report on
a form prescribed by the Department."
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
Name of Mine North Orange Quarry County . Orange Permit Humber 68--06
Name of Company/Owner Nello L. Teer Company
Official Mailing Address P. 0. Box 1131, Durham, NC Zip Code 27702
Telephone [phone] Check if change of address or telephone
1. (a) If mine is now inactive, when did mining stop? Date N/A
(b) Is this stoppage permanent? N/A 3.es t:o.
2. List by category the total amount of new land affected by mining activities
in the 1988 calender year and locate each area on your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 0 acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: �0� acres.
(C) STOMILES: 0 acres.
X Check here if no new acreage
(D) MINE EXCAVATION: 0 acres.
(E) PLANT AREA: 0 acres.
affected in 1988.
3. Estimate by category the amount of new acreage to be affected by mining
activities in the 1989 calender year and locate the outline of each area on
your updated mine map.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 0 acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: ' 0 acres.
(B) %%STE PILES: 2.29 acres. (E) PLANT AREA: 3.58 acres.
(C) STOCKPTTI:S: 0 acres. and roads
Check here if no new acreage is to be affected in 1989.
4. List by category the total amount of disturbed and unreclaimed land present
at this site at the end of the 1988 calender year.
(A) TAILINGS PONDS: 0 acres. (D) MINE EXCAVATION: acres.
(B) WASTE PILES: 0 acres. (E) PLANT AREA: 0 acres.
(C) STOCKPILES: 0 acres. -'
(C ONTMM ON REVERSE SIDE)
NOTE: WASTEPILES should include overburden storage/disposal areas and berms.

a
5. List by category the amount of land that has been completely reclaimed in
1988 and is not subject to continued use in future mining related
activities. Briefly describe the reclamation work conducted and indicate
if you wish to have any of these areas released from your current bonding
requirements. Accurately locate the outline of all such areas on your
updated mine map.
. * ► TT TT T1 G rY�n� . acres. Explain:
ICIJ iKJ 3" "N L Va�aJ�-! . � r��_ _
Release Requested: Yes No
(B) WASTE PILES: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
(C) STOCKPILES: acres. Explain:
Release Requested: Yes No
rr") VT�.TE EXCAIrnTTnt�7. arrec. F`xnlaln-
1LJ 1�LLlVL LL1\..�lYAl ION.
r--- -
(E) PLAN!' AREA
Release Requested: Yes No
acres. Explain:
Release Reques Yes No
x Check here if no reclamation conducted in 1988.
Person responsible for reclamation (please print):
Signature of company aany officer or owner:- `[ , e
Title:
Donald A
--
Date: February 27 1989
Complete and return by February 1 two copies of this form along with two copies
of an updated mine map to:
Land Quality Section
D-NRCD
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
FAILURE TO FILE THIS FORM BY THE DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN THE ASSESSMENT CE
CIVIL PENALTIES AND COULD EVEN RMMT IN THE RRVOCATION OF YOUR MMM PEI&=-

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCSES & COMM %'ITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND RESOURCES DIVISION
LAND QUALITY SECTION
TELEPHONE LOG
Sheet
O
Date Z�
County D
Call received ✓ Call placed
1. Project:
2. Conversati
3. Content of conversation:
/ r
J��IWONA. XCA t
I 11mill
" �W� RW�IIJWAIM
F",� -
u vy

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCSES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAND RESOURCES DIVISION
LAND QUALITY SECTION
TELEPHONE LOG
1. Project:
z. Conversati
3. Content of conversation:
PontATAW L6.04 I I I-67MI-FAM
I A
A
+� •
Sheet
Date S1ZZ
County
Call received `� Call placed
10i11ed Uy: f — 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary March 15, 1988 Director
Mr. James Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Company
211 W. Parrish Street
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
RE: North Orange Quarry
Permit No. 68-6
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
There are two typographical errors on Page 4 of the above referenced mining
permit. In Section 5, the monitoring schedule for recording static water
levels, pit discharge and rainfall should have been.on a bimonthly rather than
weekly basis. In Section.6, slope stabilization -should be accomplished within
60 days of completion. Please find enclosed a revised Page 4--of your permit
reflecting these corrections.
Should you have any questions on this matter please advise. Thank you for
your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEC/sl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
PG nox 276877, Raleigh, North Qruiina 2761-76671 Ter Owwwc 919-733-3833
An E"I Opportunity Affirmaeiuc Action Employer

Page 4 of 9
southwest corner of the small berm located southeast of the Temporary
Sediment Basin.
5. Groundwater Protection
The six observation wells denoted as (0-1) thru (0-6) on Figure 1 of
Appendix B submitted with the approved application for a permit, along with
the wells located on the Doug Harris and Bruce DeWald tracts, shall be
monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of
consolidated material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the
determination of pre-existing (static) groundwater levels.
The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock
and.grouted.to the surface. .The wells (boreholes) shall be extended to the
first water bearing zone in the consolidated rock.. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The necessary
permits to construct these wells shall be obtained from the N.C. Division
of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
The observation wells shall be monitored -bimonthly at the same day and
approximate time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months following the
installation of the wells. The static water levels shall be referenced to
a datum point and a record of the water levels maintained. The bimonthly
precipitation and the volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded.
Copies of these records shall be provided to the Department on or about the
end of each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may be
increased or decreased following thd'initial twelve (12) month period as
deemed appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any
excavated -channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite-damage because
of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with groundcover,
devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the pit shall be graded to a
minimum 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical and shall be stabilized within 60
days of completion. -
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall }fie graded so -as to prevent collection of pools of
,.. dam......... r------- -- - pools
that are, or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent,.such,.conditions.

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Rrso=es
512 North Salis6my Stint a Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Spry February 5, 1988 Director
Mr. James Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Company
211 W. Parrish Street
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
REt North Orange Quarry
Orange County
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
The application for a mining permit for North Orange Quarry in Orange
County has been found to meet the requirements of G.S. 74-51 of The Mining
Act of 1971. As your company already has a blanket bond sufficient to cover
this application, T am,enclosing the mining permit.
The conditions of Mining Permit No. 68-6 were based primarily upon
information supplied in the application with conditions added as necessary to
insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. This permit expires on
February 5, 1998. G.S. 74-65 states that the issuance of a mining permit
does not supercede local zoning regulations. The responsibility of
compliance with the applicable zvrii�;g regulations lies with you.
Please review the permit and notify this office of any objection or
question concerning the terms of the permit.
Sincerely,
omas E. Carroll, P. G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
TEC/cjt
Enclosure
cc_ Mr, Tnhn Holley, P.E.
PO. Box 27w7, Itakigh, North Carolina 27&1-7687 Telephone 91%733.3833
An Equal Opportunity Affirtnnkw Action Emp6m

r
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
P E R M I T
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68,
"The Mining Act of 1971," Mining Permit Regulation 15'NCAC
5 6, and other applicable laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Nello L. Teer Company
North Orange -Quarry
Orange County - Permit No. 68-6
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic
values of all lands and waters affected by this mining operation
will receive the greatest practical degree of protection and
restoration.

4
Page 2 of 9
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby
approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in conformity with the approved
Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this permit, provisions
must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation.
This permit is expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements
of the approved Reclamation Plan. However, completed performance of the
approved Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation, secured by the bond or
other security on file with the Department, and may survive the expiration,
revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following
exception: If another operator succeeds to the interest of the
permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue of a sale, lease,
assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from
the duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the
Mining Act with reference to the permitted operation, and transfer the
permit to the successor operator, provided that both operators have
complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to
reclamation of the affected land and posts a suitable bond or other
security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or
permittee's successor is not complying with the Reclamation Plan or
other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing to achieve the
purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the
permit, or its intent to modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in
the permit. The operator shall have right to a hearing at a designated
time and place on any proposed modiff&tion, revocation or suspension by
the Department. Alternatively and in=addition to the above, the
Department may institute other enforcemgnt procedures authorized by law.
nPfinitinns
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise, terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by
the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
rnnditinn¢
The permitted mining operation shall not violate standards of air
quality, surface water quality, or ground water quality promulgated by
the Environmental Management Commission.
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until February 5,
1998 and shall be subject to the provisions of .the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46,
et. seq., and to the following conditions and limitations:

V
Page 3 of 9
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
1. Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with
the requirements and regulations promulgated by the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, Water Quality Section.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and regulations
promulgated by the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, Air Quality
Section.
The access (plant entrance) road shall be paved from its junction with NC
57 to the office/scale house. During quarry operation, water trucks or
nthRr mean-, that may hp nPrP-,-,ary -,hall hp I1tili7Pd to nrPvPnt duct from
leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway to prevent sedimentation of that waterway from erosion
of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the natural
watercourse.
The buffer zones shown on the Resource Development Plan dated May, 1987 and
revised September 21, 1987 shall be maintained to prevent caving of any
adjoining property and to allow grading of the side slopes to the required
angle. These buffer zones, with the exception of the installation of
required sediment control measures; shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions,
earthen dikes, brush barriers, silt check dams, silt retarding structures,
rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any
land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from discharging onto
adjacent surface areas or into any lake or natural watercourse in proximity
to the affected land.
The Sediment and Erosion Control Plan dated May, 1987 and revised December
21, 1987 shall be followed. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall
be submitted to the Department for approval prior to any land disturbing
activities not indicated on the revised erosion control plan or mine maps
submitted with the approved application for a mining permit. Such areas
include, but are not limited to, expansion outside of the initial pit area
(` 19.4n arrPSl_ rrPPk rrntsinnS_ nr Pxnan-,inn of nvPrhiirdpn di-,nn-,al
areas.
Suitable rip -rap gravel filter cheek dams, instead of silt fencing, shall
be provided in areas of concentrated flow along the south end of the berm
along N.C. 57, southeast end of the berm north of the Wick's property, and

5.
RI
Page 4 of 9
southwest corner of the small berm located southeast of the Temporary
Sediment Basin.
Groundwater Protection
The six observation wells denoted as (0-1) thru (0-6) on Figure 1 of
Appendix B submitted with the approved application for a permit, along with
the wells located on the Doug Harris and Bruce DeWald tracts, shall be
monitored at least 30 days toinitiating any excavations of
consolidated material (roc�rior
in the initial pit area to allow for the
determination of pre-existing (static) groundwater levels.
The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock
and grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended to the
first water bearing zone in the consolidated rock. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The necessary
permits to construct these wells shall be obtained from the N.C. Division
of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
The observation wells shall be monitored once per week at the same day and
approximate time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months following the
installation of the wells. The static water levels shall be referenced to
a datum point and a record of the water levels maintained. The weekly
precipitation and the volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded.
Copies of these records shall be provided to the Department on or about the
end of each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may be
increased or decreased following the initial twelve (12) month period as
deemed appropriate by the Department.
Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative -cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. Tn any event, exposed slopes or any
excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage because
of siltation, shall be planted or otherwise provided with groundcover,
devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the pit shall be graded to
minimum 1 112 horizontal to i vertical and shall be stabilized within 30
days of completion.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so
water that are, or likely to become,
such as drainage ditches or conduits
required to prevent such conditions.
as to prevent collection of pools of
noxious or foul. Necessary structures
shall be constructed or installed when

4
6. Blasting
Page 5 of 9
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of any pre -blast
surveys conducted. Furthermore, the operator shall provide to the
Department a copy of the findings of any seismic studies conducted at this
facility. The operator shall make every reasonable effort to incorporate
the report's recommendations into the production blasting program.
The.following blasting conditions shall be observed by the operator to
prevent hazard to persons and adjacent property from thrown rock or
vibrations:
A. In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided,
the maximum peak particle velocity of any component'of ground motion
shall not exceed 1 inch per second at the immediate location of any
building regularly occupied by human beings such as dwelling house,
church, school, public building, or commercial or institutional
building. The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph.
B. Airblast overpressure shall not exceed 128 decibels linear (dBL) as
measured at the immediate location of any regularly occupied building
such as any dwelling house, church, school, public building, or
commercial or institutional building.-
C. The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to insure that
flyrock is not thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or
permanently guarded by the operator. Should flyrock occur beyond the
guarded area or the levels in Items A and B above are exceeded, the
operator shall report the incident to the Department immediately and
further use of explosive at the site shall be immediately suspended
until the following actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation -as to the cause(s) of the incident shall
be conducted.
C. A satisfactory report detailing the investigation shall be
provided to the Department within 10 days of the incident. Said
report shall, at a minimum, document the cause(s) of the
incident along with technical and management actions that will be
taken to prevent further inridents.
The report shall meet with the approval of the Department before
blasting may resume at the site. Failure to take corrective measures
to prevent flyrock and repeated instances of flyrock shall be
considered a violation of this permit.
D. The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast
describing: the total number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of
intervals_ denth and size of holes; +nn -nd +n+Ml nn..n.1r
_. v
d, b, 114 u-iv bV%lul JJVUIIu� of
explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount of stemming and
burden for each hole; and blast location. Records shall be maintained
at the permittee's mine office and copies shall be provided to the
Department upon request.

E. The -operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24 hour
advance notice to the Land Quality Section prior to any blast during a
.period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A' physical barrier of oversized rock shall be maintained around.the
perimeter of.any highwall to'prevent inadvertent public access.
10. Visual Screening
Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between
the mine and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the
operation from the public.
Berms shall be located as shown on the Resource Development Plan dated
September.21, 1987 and shall be constructed prior to initiating quarrying
activities. in addition to grasses, the berms shall be planted with white
pines having a minimum height of four (4) feet on a 6x6 staggered spacing.
11. Plan Modification
The operator.shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to
delete, modify or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or
erosion/sediment control plan contained in the approved application for a
mining permit. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained from
the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
12. Refuse Disposal
No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that are generated
outside of the mining permit area'.shall be allowed within the boundaries of
the mining permit area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has
first been obtained from of Human Resources, Division of
Health Services.and the Department of Natural Resources, Land Quality
Section. The method of disposal shall be consistent with the approved
reclamation plan.
Refuse generated on -site and directly associated with -the mining activity
may be temporarily stockpiled on -site -in the Surplus Material Storage -Area
prior to periodic removal for offsite-disposal.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual -Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department on February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved.

Page 7 of 9
14. Bonding
The security which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$25,000 Blanket Bond is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated on
the approved application. This security must remain in force for this
permit to be valid. The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded
acreage.
15. Archaeological_Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources.

4
Page 8 of 9
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of
which is a condition on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit.
Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a separable obligation of the
permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other
unconsolidated materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize
the possibility of slides and be consistent with the future use of
the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be
provided in all excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is
in accordance with accepted conservation practices and which is
suitable for the proposed subsequent use of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the
mined area that are, likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended
agronomic and reforestation practices as established by the North
Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the North Carolina
Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the
Reclamation Plan herein incorpotated. These activities shall be
conducted according to the time schedule included in the plan, which
shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous with
mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the
earliest practicable time after completion or termination of mining
on any segment of the permit area and shall be completed within two
years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the
planned reclamation as depicted on the Initial Rellamation Plan dated
September 21, 1987 shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with
water, provide a permanent barricade along the top of any highwall, and
grade and revegetate any areas in unconsolidated material.

Page 9 of 9
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable
for the planned future use are as follows:
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or
waste piles shall be graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter slope and terraced -as necessary to insure slope
stability.
B. The primary and secondary settling ponds shall be backfilled and
stabilized. The retention pond shall remain as an acceptable lake.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the
mine excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise
prepared before revegetation.
F. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site.
Scrap metal, trash or other such waste shall be removed from the site
and properly disposed.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of
noxious or foul water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Seedbed
Preparation and Seeding Schedule provided on Drawing 6 of 6 of the Site
Plan dated May, 1987.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simgltaneously with mining to the
extent feasible. In any event, reclamation shall be initiated as
soon as feasible after completion or termination of mining of any
mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or
termination of mining.
Permit issued this 5th day of February, 1988.
By.
Stephen G. Conrad, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of land Resources
512 North Salisbuuy Strret a Ralco, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor Stephen G. Conrad
& Thomas Rhodes, Scc-rrtary March 15, 1988 Director
Mr. James Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Company
211 W. Parrish Street
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
RE: North Orange Quarry
Permit No. 68-6
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
There are two typographical errors on Page 4 of the above referenced mining
permit. In Section 5, the monitoring schedule for recording static water
levels, pit discharge and rainfall should have been.on a bimonthly rather than
weekly basis. In Section.6, slope stabilization should be accomplished within
60 days of completion. Please find enclosed a revised Page 4---of your permit
reflecting these corrections.
Should you have any questions ouL.this matter please advise. Thank you for
your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
< V
Thomas E. Carroll, P.G.
Mining Specialist
Land Q ua l i ty Section
TEC/sl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
P.O. Box 27697, RakO, North Car ina 27611-7687 Tdephow 919L733-3833
An Equal Oppartunky AFNmuci c Action 1 mpimm

Page 4 of 9
southwest corner of the smell berm located southeast of the Temporary
Sediment Basin.
S. Groundwater Protection
The six observation wells denoted as (0-1) thru (0-6) on Figure 1 of
Appendix B submitted with the approved application for a permit, along with
the wells located on the Doug Harris and Bruce DeWald tracts, shall be
monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of
consolidated material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the
determination of pre-existing (static) groundwater levels.
The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock
and grouted.'to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended to the
first water bearing zone in the consolidated rock. The wells shall be
secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable cap. The necessary
permits to construct these wells shall be obtained from the N.C. Division
of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
The observation wells shall be monitored bimonthly at the same day and
approximate time of day for twelve (12) consecutive months following the
installation of the wells. The static water levels shall be referenced to
a'datum point and a record of the water levels maintained. The bimonthly
precipitation and the volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded.
Copies of these records shall be provided to the Department on or about the
end of each month. Static water level monitoring frequency may be
increased or decreased following the -initial twelve (12) month period as
deemed appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
The angle for graded slopes and jUlls shall be no greater than the angle
which can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control
measure, structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any
excavated channels, the erosion of which may cause offsite damage because
of siltation, shall be planted or.otherwise provided with groundcover,
devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the pit shall be graded to a
minimum 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical and shall be stabilized within 60
days of completion.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of
water that are, or likely to become,'noxious or foul. Necessary structures
such as drainage ditches or conduits shall be constructed or installed when
required to prevent. qt;_Fh•conditions.

oo�noQ o�ppe� NELLO L- TEER COMPANY
QOQi dF ;� . A Subsidiary of Abppem Company, Inc.
P. O- BOX 1 131 DURHAM, N. C. U. S. A. 27702
0000 0
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 57-9446
July 1, 1987 " 46;
Mr. Tom Carroll
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development £G'f�o
Land Quality Section N
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Mining Permit Application
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Orange County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Carroll:
It is with pleasure that I submit this permit application for the
proposed North Orange Quarry for your review and approval. Please find
enclbsed the following information pertinent to this application:
1) Mine Permit Application
2) Mine Plans
3) Supplemental information concerning stormwater runoff
calculations, crncinn rnntrnl ctrrrrtrrroac anr� rhannnl
design.
We are also in the process of submitting to the Division of
Environmental Management the appropriate applications for NPDES, Air
Quality, and Non -Discharge permits.
In order to facilitate the review process of this application, I
am sending under separate cover a duplicate of the aforementioned infor-
mation to Mr. -John Holley at your Raleigh regional office.
If you have any questions or require further information, please
don't hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY
mes R. H. Sprinkle, CPGS
/cf
Enclosures
FOUNDED 1909

APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT
In 1971, the North Carolina General Assembly created
the North Carolina Mining act, General Statutes 74-50.
After July 1, 1972, no operator shall engage in mining
without having first obtained from the Department an
operating permit which covers the affected land and
which has not been terminated, been revoked, been
suspended for the period in question, or otherwise
become invalid.
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.4. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]

C
1
2
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Name of Mine North Orange County county Orange
Name of company Nello L. Teer Company _
3. Home Office Address 211 W. Parrish Street, P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
4. Permanent address for receipt of official mail Same as above
919/682-6191 'Telephone
5. Mine Office Address Not known at present time
Not knowri'at present time
Telephone
6. Mine Manager To be named at a later date.
We hereby certify that all details contained in
this Permit Application are true and correct to
the best of our knowledge. We fully understand
that any willful misrepresentation t cts will
be cause for permit revocation.
"Signature
— �(�
J. Thomas Gould
Title Vice President
Date . �01- u 19 81
'The Land Quality Section should
be notified of change in permanent
address or telephone number.
"Signature of company officer required.
2

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at site.
Acres owned 27 Acres leased 142 Property owner if leased
Mr. Donald Reed Poole and Mr. Douglas W. Harris
2. Name of materials mined: Quartz Diorite and Felsic Metovolcanics
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground
Shovel & TruckX Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper
Other
r
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine 120 ft- for initial 10-year period
b. Expected average depth of mine 80 ft. for initial 10-year period
5. Area of previous activity: (Identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive and has not been
reclaimed: N/A
•/111nto• Minn mnn chnrilri r1 nrly inrfirr!nta nnu rlict„rharl aranc not to ha inr•lr,rinrf
in this permit application. Explain why these areas should not be included.)
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site
N/A
6. Present (premining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland X Pasture X Forest X FishlWildlife _2L Recreation x Other
i 7. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed:
Cropland _'X Pasture X Forest X FishlWildlife x Recreation Other
B. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage to be disturbed during initial year of operation:
a. Area used for tailing ponds, retention ponds, spillways 6 acres
b. Area used for stockpiles 5 acres
c. Area used for waste piles 5 acres
d. Area used for processing plants and onsite haul roads 12 acres
e. Area of mine excavation, including areas being prepared for mining, actively
mined, and inactive but not reclaimed. 14 acres
f. TOTAL a-e 47 acres
3. Estimate the maximum amount of land to be disturbed and unreclaimed at
any one time during the life of the permit. 40 acres
3
l
i

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Check acreage to be bonded': Total affected acreage figure from 132f OR B3
(page 3) whichever is larger, equals acreage to be bonded. (See 15 NCAC 58.0003 for
bond amounts.)
0 - 4.99 acres
5 - 9.99 acres
10 • 24.99 acres
X 25+ - acres
5. Will your company file a blanket bond covering all of its mining operations in North
Carolina?
Yes X No
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water,
or other waste water handling?
Yes X No
b. Will the operation involve dewatering the mine or discharging fresh or waste
water from the mine or plant?
Yes X No
c. If you answered yes to either question -la or lb, provide evidence that you have
applied for or have obtained a water quality permit from the Division of En-
vironmental Management Both wastewater and no -d s
are in the process of being submitted..
2. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emission?
Yes X No
If yes, Indicate evidence that you have applied for or have obtained an air quality
permit issued by the Division of Environmental Management, Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development. An air quality permit is in the process of
being submitted to the State For review and approval.
b. How will fugitive dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc. be controlled? A wet suppression
system for the plant, as filed with the Division of Environmental Management Air.
Quality Section, will be the primary control for fugitive dust in the plant area.
Spray bars and nozzles at transfer points in the processing plant will ally any
particulate emissions in the plant and stockpile areas. Also, most aggregate pro-
ducts will be washed stone gradations with little or no fines. Haul roads and site
access roads will also be monitored for fugitive dust. As the need arises, a water
wagon will spray water along these routes to further inhibit any dust from becoming
airborne..
'In lieu of the surety bond required by this section, the operator may file with the
Department a cash deposit, negotiable securities, a mortgage of real property accep-
table to the Department, or an assignment of a savings account in a North Carolina
bank on an assignment form prescribed by the Department. The amount of land disturb-
ed and unreclaimed at any one time must not exceed the bonded amount. The mining
permit is issued only for that area covered by the bond.
4

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
3. Generally describe the sequence of land disturbing activities and reference the se-
quence to the mine map(s).
Listed below is the sequence of operations required to bring the new quarry on
line. Most, if not all, of these operations will require land disturbance. It
should be noted that most operations will run concurrently with others.
1. Grading of plant access road.
2. Location of utilities.
3. Establishment of Erosion Control. _
4. Grading of plant area in preparation of plant erection.
5. Grading of shop area(s) and employee parking lot.
6. Grading of office area and landscaping.
7. Construction of water retention and settlement ponds.
8. Construction of visual barrier berms.
9. Stripping of overburden in initial pit area.
Items 1 and 2 will be the initial work done onsite. During this stage, the
development and implementation of the erosion control plan, as shown on the
mine map, will commence. As earthmoving activities in other areas begin, the
erosion control plan in these areas will be established prior to any land
disturbance.
After construction of the access road and location of utilities, grading in the
plant area, shop area, and employee parking lot will commence, followed by grading
and landscaping of the office area. Visual barrier berms in these areas will be
built concurrent with the respective grading operation.
The final earthmoving activities will include the construction of the water
retention and settlement ponds. Excess excavation from these activities will
be used, in part, to build the major visual barrier berm along the western
property line (NCST). Any further embankment material needed to compelte this
berm will come from overburden stripping operations in the initial pit area.
6

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining process and any ad-
joining property or highway right-of-way?
It is anticipated that no mining will occur within 200 feet of presently
existing property lines along the northern, southern, and western borders of
the tract. To the west, no quarrying will occur within 400 feet of N.C. 57.
The site presently consists of farmland which is partially wooded but which
has, in many areas, been cleared to the property lines. In those areas which are
wooded, a natural vegetation buffer zone of variable width will be maintained.
In areas that have been cleared to the property line, it is recommended that an
earthern visual barrier berm be constructed of sufficient height along the property
line to effectively screen off the mining site. The main visual barrier berm will
be located along the east side of NC 57.
The visual barrier berms will be built using siandard construct -ion practices,
and will be seeded in accordance with the Revegetation Plan. To further screen
the operation, loblolly and/or white pine will be planted along the berm crest.
�-- --- ♦►ods �., he fnLeon d�irinn mining to prevent physical hazard
b. Describe Vine iTieiiivu� W Lj. ,�.1-1
to any neighboring dwelling house, public road, public, commercial or in-
dustrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such structures on the
mine map if they are within 300 feet of the excavation.
To prevent any physical hazard to neighboring houses, no miffing will be
conducted within 300 feet of any dwelling or building. Likewise, no mining
activities will occur within 400 feet of NC 57.
Prior to quarrying, a preblast survey will be conducted in and around
neighboring homes to determine the pre-existing structural condition of those
dwellings. Once quarrying has begun, all quarry blasts will be monitored with
a seismograph to insure the peak particle velocities and overpressures are
within local, state, and federal guidelines.
c. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public entry
along.any high wall area.
During the life of the quarry, a barrier of oversize rock will be placed
along the top of the highwall to prevent accidental entry or passage over the
highwall. Furthermore, signs warning of open pit mining will be placed at
regular intervals along the top of the highwall and along property lines.
6

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. Describe erosion and sediment control measures to be taken before and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for erosion control
for mine excavation, waste piles, and process areas), and give a sequence of in-
stallation. Location(s) of erosion and sediment control measures must also be in-
dicated on mine map. Engineering designs and calculations shall be required when
needed to justify the adequacy of proposed measures.
During the life of the quarry, any cleared land not being used in the
mining operation will be seeded for pasture land or will continue to be farmed.
Within the affected area of the mine site, a series of diversion ditches (grass
lined or rip -rapped) will be constructed and maintained to channel all runoff
water to settling ponds or sedimentation basins prior to its release into any.
stream.
As previously mentioned in Section 3 (sequence of operations) the erosion
control plan will be developed as construction activities begin onsite. Prior
to earthwork activities in any given area, the erosion control structures designed
for that area will be established and tied into any previously built erosion
control devices.
6. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining
properties during mining.
In order to prevent landslides and/or slope failure adjacent to adjoining
.
properties, cut slopes will be graded on slopes no steeper than, i+ j;.1 � and fill -
slopes no steeper than 2:1. In addition, all slopes will be seeded as soon
as possible after grading has been completed and will be in accordance with
the-revegetation plan contained herein.
Furthermore, as previously stated in sections 4(a) and 4(b), buffer zones
of varying widths will be maintained in areas of existing vegetation, and no
mining will occur within 200 ft. of existing property lines.
__ during mfl orals. or soils present? If so; describe how acid water pollu-
tion will be prevented.
N/A
7

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
8. Describe plans for screening operations from public view such as maintaining or
planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or other measures. The
location of visual screening should be shown on the mine map.
As shown on the mine map, screening shall initially consist of
construction of the visual barrier berm along NC 57. This berm is necessary
since there is a total absence of any natural vegetation in this area as
a result of farming operations. Visual barrier berms E, F, and C will also
be located in areas that lack sufficient natural vegetation to'effectively screen
out the operation from surrounding properties ' These berms will be constructed
prior to initial quarry operations.
All visual barrier berms will be seeded in various grasses as berm
construction proceeds to minimize slope erosion, with berm crests to be
planted with loblolly and/or white pine seedlings for additional screening
capability.
9. If explosives will be used, describe what precaution will be used to prevent
physical hazard to persons or neighboring property by flying rocks or excessive air
blasts or ground vibrations. Locate the nearest offsite structures on the mine map.
Since blasting will be an integral part of this operation, each blast
will be monitored with a seismograph to insure that peak particle velocities
and peak overpressures are within limits established by local, state, and
federal authorities. A recording of each blast will be made on magnetic
tape and will be sent to a third party consultant for analysis using the
Response Spectrum Velocity Profile (RSVP) technique.
As an additional precaution, some preliminary seismic studies will be
r__nnducted onsite to determine the preferred direction of blasting and pit
development to further lessen the possibility of excessive peak particle
velocities during actual mining conditions.
8

10. What is the depth to the ground water table? If the mine excavation extends below
the water table, how will mine dewatering impact neighboring wells? Locate any
wells on the mine map that exist within 500 feel of the permit area if the mine ex-
cavation will extend below the ground water table.
Research of available information indicates water bearing zones between
30-50 ft. and 90--100 ft. beneath the land surface. Static water levels appear
to range between 30 ft. and 50 ft. below the surface.
Although the maximum depth of the mine during the initial 10 year period
is expected to be 120 ft., there should be no adverse impact on neighboring
wells since most existing wells are a minimum of 600 ft. from the anticipated
mining limits.
11. What precautions will be taken during mining operations to prevent significant
adverse effects on wildlife, or freshwater, estuarine or marine fisheries?
In the context of this permit application, estuarine and/or marine
fisheries are not applicable. Concerning wildlife and freshwater fisheries,
certain precautions will be taken to prevent any adverse impact to eithdr..
As previously stated in section 5, any cleared or wooded 'land not being used
for mining activities will be left in its natural state. Any cleared Land
now being farmed will either continue to be farmed or put into pasture. This
will provide food for foraging wildlife and will also prevent siltation of
the two intermittent streams which are located on the property.
A further precaution to protect fisheries is the implementation of the
erosion control plan in the mining area which will collect all stormwater
runoff and allow its controlled discharge into streams after its suspended
load has settled out.
Other than stormwater runoff, the only anticipated discharge of water
will occur infrequently when mine dewatering operations are required. During
those times, water quality will be monitored and the standards as set by the
Division of Environmental Management -Water Quality Section will be adhered to.
3

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
1 n nocf-rifle vrh,lr in+anriari ninn f^r 4F,n rnnlmm�lin 4.n., .,.r...� ! II 11..�•_„1
7v 1 l4r1.0 44.J l./,ull IV1 111G fGylr",, ion ands suuscyuent use of all affected
lands and indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this land:
Reclamation of disturbed areas will be an integral part of the active
quarrying operations. As areas are disturbed, revegetation will be in
accordance with the Revegetation Plan. Please refer to the initial reclamation
plan found on drawing no. 3 of the plan sheets.
Concerning the plant site, this --area will be graded and revegetated
according to the Revegetation Plan. The primary and secondary settling
ponds will be filled in and treated in a like manner.
The quarry pit itself will be allowed to fill with groundwater and can
be used to provide water storage and --recreation for the local area. Furthermore,
the retention pond will also remain andl"will be stocked with fish (see below).
b. If an excavated or impounded body of water is to be left as a part of the reclama-
tion, estimate the average depth of water. Will the water body be stocked with fish?
If so, specify species.
Listed below are the average water depths of impoundment areas which will
remain upon cessation of mining and reclamation activities.
1. Quarry Pit - 100 ft. +
2. Water retention pond -- 40 ft.
All impoundment areas are intended for recreational use and will be stocked
with bass and bluegill with a distribution to be determined by the N.C. Wildlife
Commission.
10

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
2. In excavation of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, indicate the angle of final slopes.
Angles of final slopes in overburden and soil will vary according to
depth of excavation and the intended use of the excavated area. Overburden
in the pit area will be placed on 1J:1 to 2:1 slopes, and slopes in ditch -
lines will be placed on slopes of 2:1 or flatter.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed ex-
cavations in rock including what kind of permanent barricade will be left.
As a safety precaution, a fifteen (15) foot wide safety bench will be left
for each 35 ft. of bench height in all final rock slopes. Additionally, a
permanent fence will be erected around the pit to prevent unauthorized entry.
Danger signs will be placed at regular intervals around the pit perimeter
warning of the open pit.
4. Indicate method of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such mine
waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping.
As overburden is placed in designated waste areas, it is spread and
compacted by dozers and the hauling units. Slopes in waste area(s) (and in
t _--'-_ -. ) i be v,-ade to 2: 1 or flatter and reve etated as soon as
eCI1Ud111UYlClIL areas) will. b�..__- g
possible to prevent erosion. Drainage on top of'the waste area(s) will be
established to prevent pooling and stagnation of water, and to control
stormwater runoff. Final reclamation of the waste area(s) will include final
top and slope dressing (if required) and revegetation according to the
revegation lamas cort a ned herein.
5. State what precautions wil a taken in reclamation to insure that the reclaimed site is
not detrimental to animal or fish life.
The same precautions as stated in section 111, page 9, of this permit
' ication will apply to any post -mining r :cw �::�ation Furthermore the
application rr j r r
retention pond will be reclaimed by first removing any silt deposits and then
refilling the pond and sedimentation basins,and other erosion control structures
will be cleared out and left in good, workable condition. In addition, plant,
stockpile, and shop areas will be scarified and revegetated according to the
revegetation plan as contained herein.
In order to provide additional shelter for foraging animals in cleared
areas, some supplemental planting of loblolly and shortleaf pine will be done.
11

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
6. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and onsite roadways.
Reclamation in these areas will occur in two stages; first, the plant and stock-
piles will be removed from the site, followed by scarifying of these locations and
revegetating according to the revegetation plan as contained herein. Furthermore,
any site access roads not utilized in the end use -development of the site will be
treated in the same manner.
The erosion control structures in these areas will also be cleaned out and left
in good working condition since they will be incorporated into the end use develop-
ment of the site.
7. State the method of reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins.
Sedimentation basins will be reclaimed by first removing existing silt deposits
in order to return these structures to useful conditions. Ponds will then be
allowed to refill and will be stocked with bass and bluegill populations in the
best distribution as determined by the North Carolina Wildlife Commission.
8. State the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk
machinery, cables, or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in
The Mining Act of 1971)
Fuel oil storage tanks will be placed above ground to prevent groundwater contami-
nation. To insure against seepage from an accidental tank rupture, earthen containment
berms will be constructed around the tank area. Berm height and the containment area
will be designed to contain the maximum volume of fuel to be stored in the tank area
at any one time.
A disposal area will also be designated for the following items: drill steel and
bits, cable and conveyor belting. The disposal area will be divided into three units
and each unit designated to contain one of the aforementioned items. No other items
will be disposed of in this area. Any other waste products, including but not limited
to those listed below, will be disposed of off site by licensed private collection firms
under contract with Teer Company.
1. Tires
2. Spent Motor Oil/Hydraulic Oil
3. Batteries
44 Scr p Metal
5. ,Tun Machinery
The disposition of waste material from the minin operation i1.e., silt and overburden
have been previously addressed in section 4 of the Reclamation Plan.
1

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
9. Indicate the method of restoration or establishment of any drainage channels to a con-
dition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. Give design details of any per-
manent channels to be constructed.
As it now exists, the proposed permit area is being farmed, and although drainage
ways are established, they are at best inadequate to prevent future erosion and siltation
from occurring. Lt is intended that the erosion control plan for this permit be made a
permanent part of the reclamation plan and the future end use of this site. Any further
site development could therefore tie into the established erosion control features imple-
mented during mining.
In order to leave the erosion control structures in good working order —permanent
channels, sedimentation basins, etc. will be cleaned out and restored to the approximate
lines and grades as originally designed. Any necessary revegetation of permanent drainage
structures resulting from reclamation activities will be according to the Revegation
Plan contained herein.
10. Describe provisions for prevention of noxious, odious or foul water collecting or remain-
ing in mined areas.
In those locations of the permit area which will require final dressing or grading
of the surface for reclamation, land surfaces will be graded to lines and grades which
will prevent the pooling of water in shallow depressions. All drainage structures which
will be incorporated into the permanent erosion control plan will be cleaned out and
left in a free drainage state. Any pipes, culverts, and conduits to remain will be
inspected to insure their soundness and will be cleaned out and replaced if necessary.
Overflow pipes between water impoundment areas designated for future recreational
use will also be cleaned out to insure the free flow of water from one pond to the
other.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
The basic premise for the revegetation plan for the Northern Orange quarry
is quite simple in that the revegetation processes proposed, would in fact,
complement the quarrying operations and facilitate the end use reclamation.
It is proposed that the area designated as buffer zones on the mining plan
would remain as such and basically be kept intact as a natural area and
would not be disturbed by mining or reclamation processes. The reason
for keeping the natural buffer area is obviously to isolate the mining
operations from adjacent properties not only for safety but also for aes-
thetics.
The plant site during the course of mining operations would be surfaced.
with stone and upon reclamation would be recontoured in such a manner to
allow for adequate drainage and established with a lawn/pasture type grass.
The open pasture land which presently exists in certain portions of the
quarry site would be established. with a cover by utilizing a special seed
mix prepared by the N. C. Wildlife Commission which will serve as a food
fnr 4.i ld a^1e TH;i z %,)i ldl i fa CPP.ri wnillrl ha Augmented with a general gras-
sing sing seed mix utilized by the Department of Transportation for roadway
stabilization so that will provide a uniform cover.
In a similar manner, the southern portion of the initial mining area where
the quarry pit is to be located would in fact, prior to mining operations,
be covered with a similar mix of wildlife seed and grass cover in order
to accomplish two goals. One, in the short term to prevent erosion, and
secondly, in the long term to provide a food crop for wildlife.
The entrance to the quarry site itself would be heavily landscaped by es-
tablishing a bermuda/fescue grass cover adjacent to the entrance road and
scale house so that it may be maintained in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
The visual barrier berm at the entrance would be landscaped with low grow-
ing junipers and would be augmented with flowering trees on the berm itself
and adjacent access road. Periodically, in the area of the entrance, shade
trees would be planted in order to once again provide a more aesthetically
pleasing entrance.
The other visual barrier berms and retention dam located within the site
will be stabilized with a seed mix similar to that utilized by the Depart-
ment of Transportation for roadway and embankment stabilization. The grasses
used have vigorous root systems and would stabilize the surface of the visual
barrier berm very quickly and sustain that coverage for an indefinite period
of time. (See page 2.)
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved
Signat c
Title Vice President Landscape Arc ' ture
Agency
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A.
Date _ July 1, 1987
14

Page 2
Certain areas in association with the barrier berms and other open areas
will be further augmented with plantings of loblolly pine in order to facil-
itate screening and aesthetics.
Any drainageways created to facilitate erosion control measures will be es-
rahlished with a nPrmnnent veaetative cover to prevent accelerated erosion.
For seeding schedule and seedbed preparation see Drawing #6 of plans
titled.
Nello L. Teer Company
North Orange Quarry
Erosion Control Details
Dated: May, 1987
14-A

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
RECLAMATION PLAN
12. Provide a schedule of reclamation that indicates the sequence of reclamation al
proximate time frame. These should be labeled on the mine map.
(Add sheets if necessary)
It is anticipated that the affected land covered by this mining permit application!
will be used for quarrying operations beyond the time limit of the initial permit
period. It is our intent and goal to establish ongoing reclamation and revegetation
activities as soon as possible after land disturbance activities are completed in any
phase of the operation(s):
In areas where waste is to be placed, reclamation and revegetation will be
scheduled according to phase completion.
13. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "NOTICE" form or a facsimile thereof attached to this application should be seni
certified or registered mail to the adjoining landowners indicated on the mine map
unless another means of notice is approved in advance.
The completed "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be subnl;,,
ted before the application is considered complete.
15

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50 of The Mining Act of 1971, notice is hereby given
that Nello L. Teer Company, A Subsidiary of Koppers cnmpany; Tnr_ has applied
(Company Name)
on 2 July 1987 to the land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North,
(Date)
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611 for a surface mining permit to commence mining of
quartz diorite on 142 acres located 5 northeast of Caldwell
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles) (Direction) (Nearest Town)
nearroad N.C. 57 in orange County
(Road) (Name of County)
In accordance with G.S. 74-50, the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to
notify all owners of record of land adjoining the proposed site, and to notify the chief administrative
officer of the county or municipality in which the site is located. The property owner may file
written comment(s) within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice to the Department at the
above address. Should the Department determine that a significant public interest exists, a public
hearing will be held in accordance with the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development, Mining, Mineral Resources Regulation Subchapter 5B, .0011.
July 6, 1987
(Date Mailed to Addressee)
P 0-.-,Box 11-1 - - -
(Address of Applicant)
Durham, N. C. 27702

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
I, James R. H. Sprinkle an applicant, or an agent, or employee
of an applicant, for a Mining Permit from the N.C. Department of Natural Resources and Com-
munity Development, being first duly sworn, do hereby attest that the following are known owners,
both private and public, of the land adjoining the proposed mining site and that notice of the r
pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said owners
at their address shown below, such notice being given on a form provided by the Department:
(Name)
SEE ATTACHED LIST
(Attach additional list if necessary)
(Address)
I do also attest that the following is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipali-
ty in which the proposed mining site is located and that notice of the pending application has
been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail, to said office at the following address:
(Name) (Address)
KE'n?,lE-'Lll R. 11IUlllF15U11 .-. 106 L. 1"1dL dLCL Ldlle, 'Hillsborough, 1r.4• c!G!v
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the
Department that a reasonable effort has been made to notify the owners of record of the adjoin-
ing land and the chief administrative officer -of the county or municipality in compliance with
N.C.G.S. 74-50 and 15 N.C.A.C. 5B .0004(d). l understand that it is the responsibility of the appli-
cant to retain the receipts of mailing showing that the above notices were caused to be mailed
and to provide them to the Department upon request.
e"
.0 2 7 es
Date ' Si ature
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following
information: (Name of applicant) James R.H. Sprinkle title of person executing
Affidavit) Chief Geologist
I Sandra W. Joyner a Notary Public of the County of Durham
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that James R.H. Sprinkle
nersonally anoeared hefore me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit
was made by him.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this
19 87
6th of Jul
otary
My Commission expires: March 1, 1989

ADJOINTNC
PROPERTY
OWNERS
ADJACENT
TO PROPOSED NORTH
ORANGE
QUARRY
Dorsey & Christine M. Clayton
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
7
Rt. 5, Box 84
Hamlin Road
Durham, NC 27704
Elr.y & Peggy S. Holloway
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
7F
Rt. 1, Box 238A
Bahama, N.C. 27503
Darrell Ray Harris
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
7E
Rt. 3, Box 6M
Rougemont, N.C. 27572
Mason C. Day, Jr. & Dorothy
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
8
P.O. Box 759
South Boston, VA 24592
Raymond B. & lla Woodlief
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
7A
Rt. 2, Box 211
Rougemont, NC 27572
Douglas W. Harris
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
9
314 W. Margaret Lane
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
9A
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
9B
Tax
Map
4,
Parcel
9C
Bruce 1. & Nealie DeWald
Tax
Map
5,
Parcel
4B
Rt. 2, Box 209A
Rougemont, N.C. 27572
Arvent N. & Elizabeth Carpenter
Tax Map 5,
Parcel 5
618 Colgate Avenue
Durham, N.C. 27704
David & Linda Harris
Tax Map 5,
Parcel 6
Route 2
Rougemont, N.C. 27572
Gary R. & Denise Wicks
Tax Map 5,
Parcel 4A
Route 2, Box 209
Rougemont, N.C. 27572
Ewart B. Rogers
Tax Map 5,
Parcel 2
Route 2, Box 208
Rougemont, N.C. 27572
Chief Administrative Officer
Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager
106 W. Margaret Lane
Hillsbrough, NC 27278

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
14. MAPS
1. Two copies of the county highway maps and two copies of mine maps should be
submitteed vVith each permll applicallorl.
County highway maps may be obtained from:
Location Department
State Highway Commission
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Mark clearly the location of your mining operation on the county highway maps.
2. Mine maps should be accurate drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged topographic
maps of the mine area and of a scale sufficient to clearly show the following:
a. Property lines or affected area of mining
b. Outline of pits
c. Outline of stockpile areas
d. Outline of overburden disposal areas
e. Location of processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed)
f. Location and name of streams and lakes
g. Ou,tline of settling ponds
h. Location of access roads
i. Map legend:
1. Name of Company
2. Name of Mine
3. North arrow
4. County
S. Scale
6. Date prepared
7. Name and title of person preparing map
j. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all adjoining land
THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT ITEMS 2 aJ
BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
The mine maps should be correlated with the reclamation plan. The approximate
areas to be mined during the life of the permit should be clearly marked.
If reclamation is to be accomplished concurrently with mining, then show segments
that are to be mined and reclaimed during each year of the permit.
Add drawings showing typical sections or cross sections and layout of proposed
reclamation where such drawings will assist in describing your reclamation.
16

I
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and
travel upon our lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making
necessary field inspections or investigations as may be reasonably required in the administra-
tion of this Act, so long as the Department or its appointed representatives are accompanied
by an agent or representative of our Company.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever
entries on the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be
reasonably necessary in order to carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete
in the event a pond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to Section It4.
"Signed _
Title
Mine
Company
North Orange Quarry
Nello L. Teer Company
'Signature should be the same as the officer who signed the application for a permit.
Return two copies of the completed application and all maps to the appropriate Land Quality
Section Regional Office serving your area (see attached list of Regional Offices.)
19

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary August 25, 1987 Director
Mr. James Sprinkle
Nelln L- Tppr rnmpany
211 W. Parrish Street
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
RE: Mining Permit Application
Proposed North Orange Quarry
Orange County
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
The initial review has been completed on the Nello L. Teer Company's
application for a mining permit for the North Orange Quarry in Orange County.
The following deficiencies were noted in the application:
1.) In Section A, Items 6 and 7, estimated acreage figures need to be
submitted for both pre- and post -mining land uses.
2.) In Section C, Item 4(a), detailed drawings of berm cross -sections must
be submitted along with appropriate sediment control measures to be
implemented during the construction of these berms.
3.) Although we are aware that you are considering property acquisition into
Durham County at the Durham/Orange County line, we must review
individual permits according to the information -provided. Thus, it is
required that a buffer zone, similar to those already.provided in this
project, be established along the eastern -most section of your
property line.
4.) Erosion control measures:
a.) Further detail is needed on the proposed sequence of land
disturbing activities and how this is to correlate with the
implementation of the proposed erosion/sediment control measures.
PO B= 27-- Qaaw 1. North 1:-e - --
�yy �,uit `vii-iiioi � �ci[yexr-c iF9-%J3-]6'3]
An Equal Opportunity Afftnnauw Acdoo Employer

Mr. Sprinkle
August 25, 1987
Page 2
If this work is to be done in phases the construction sequence
must reflect this. For instance, the proposed sediment
basin/fresh water impoundment must be implemented during the
initial land disturbing activities. Furthermore, the outer limits
of grading/land clearing activities must be shown on the site
plan.
b.) Silt fences must be replaced by properly designed gravel and
rip -rap filter basins where concentrated flow is anticipated
(i.e., below the proposed dam construction and the visual barrier
berm in the southwest corner adjacent to NC 57).
c.) Erosion control measures must be implemented along the south
and southwestern pit boundaries during the initial land
disturbing activity until surface runoff can be directed internal
to the pit itself with no discharge.
d.) The discharge from the pond's emergency spillway must be
addressed beyond the proposed apron on the abutment slope.
5.) In Section C, Item 9, the preliminary seismic studies proposed in the
permit application need to be discussed in detail as to what
techniques will be employed and when such surveys will be conducted.
6.) In Section C, Item 10, all documentation that indicates that there
will be no adverse impact on neighboring wells must be provided (i.e.,
copies of any proposed monitoring wells, detailed hydrologic reports,
test procedures and results, etc).
7.) In the Reclamation section of the application, Item 8, the area
designated for disposal of drill steel and bits, cable, and conveyor
belting must be specified on the site plan.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two
(2) copies of the requested information to my attention at the following
address:
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

s
Mr. Sprinkle
August 25,1987
Page 3
Please advise at [phone] if you have any questions on the above.
TEC/T ED/sl
cc: Mr. John Holley, P.E.
Sincerely,
so�
Thomas E. Carroll., P.G.
Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section

Blast Vibration Problems:
Where Do We Go from Here?
vibra-tech engineers, inn.

Blast Vibration Problems:
Where do we gn from here?*
Anthony). Petro and Douglas A. Anderson
Vibra-Tech Engineers, Hazleton, PA 18201, USA
ABSTRACT
Blast vibration problems are often a matter of neighbor complaints rather than compliance
with regulations. Most such complaints are the result of low -frequency vibration, which, in
turn, is a function of the local geology and the blast design. Spectral analysis of vibration
records will indicate why there may be complaints even when there is compliance. Low -
frequency ground vibration may be reduced by changing the delay sequence such that waves
from successive holes are out -of -phase and cancel. Recording the blast waveform on
reproducible media, and appropriate computer processing of the data are the means for
addressing blast vibration problems.
INTRODUCTION
More and more, mines and quarries -are in close proximity to communities. This is
partially due to the growth of the communities, and partially to the need to reduce
transportation costs of the mine and quarry products. As a result, there is often conflict due
to the environmental effects of the mines upon the communities. Some complaints arising
from this conflict are warranted, and some are not; however, whether warranted or not, the
coiui7ct is ream, and shows no signs of abating. One of the principal causes of such
community -relation problems is blasting.
Mine operators often feel powerless in these situations. Many times it seems that nothing
helps, and the operator may randomly try one blast design after another in the search'for a
solution. Recent research conducted by Vibra-Tech Engineers, under contract to the U.S.
Bureau of Mines, offers hope for this situation.
This article has two parts, based upon the title: 'Blast vibration problems", and 'Where do
we go from here?". We will address these as the problem and the solution.
THE PROBLEM
Most countries have regulations which specify legally acceptable levels of ground vibration
generated by blasting. These regulations may be implemented either at the national or local
levels. They are typically based upon research which relates peak particle velocity to
structural damage.
In most operations, blast vibration levels are kept well below the established criteria for
avoiding damage. Yet compliance with regulations does not necessarily preclude problems:
vibrations within the appropriate regulatory limits may still annoy neighbors. Such
annoyance will lead to public relations problems and may lead to litigation.
? Irrui paper is adapied from one in press in the Joumal of Mines, Metals & Fuels (India).

-2-
For example, Figure 1 shows waveforms and response spectra for a production shot in the
US.
.01
WAVEFORMS
AIA
TRANSVERSE 0.301N/SEC
VERTICAL 0.091N/SEC
• LONGITUDINAL• 0.41 IN/SEC
RESPONSE SPECTRA
TRANSVERSE vonreral
FREQUENCY (NZ)
FREQUENCY (HZ)
TIMING INTERVAL 0.1 SEC.
Figure 1. Typical blast before Vibra-Map
_ LAAlAIT116ue�1
FREOUENCY (NZI
The vibration levels were within the most stringent US vibration criteria, as developed by the
US Bureau of Mines (Siskind, et at., 1980, USBM RI 8507). Nevertheless, the neighbors were
terribly annoyed with such blasts.
Why are neighbors annoyed? Why do they insist that "the blast is shaking my house to
the ground", when vibration criteria indicate that this could not be the case? The response
spectra show the cause of the problem. The vibration had a strong component at a frequency
of about 12 Hertz, which could possibly be amplified by the structure itself. Such vibration
will rattle windows, shake dishes on shelves, etc. A neighbor will often assume that such
rattling and shaking is evidence that the dwelling is being damaged; it is difficult to counter
this kind of "evidence" with proof of compliance with regulations. The neighbor will likely
question the credibility of the regulations, the vibration recordings, or both.
The fundamental problem, then, is with complaints and not compliance. Compliance does
not become an issue unless there are complaints; on the other hand, if there are complaints,
compliance may not be sufficient.

-3-
THE SOLLMON
Where do we atin fmom. he.ei 'at i. i.. iou aL-a Lt__ i-
bv a+v++ c+a.� sa ■o obvious �iltl� rsVfile[run� needs to be done to determine
whether complaints are valid (the windows are rattling, etc.), and to address those
complaints. For Vlbra-Tech Engineers, that "something" is three -fold:
• BIast waveforms must be recorded using seismometers with a recording medium that
allows efficient and accurate recovery of the data for computer processing.
• The recorded waveforms must be processed using spectral -analysis techniques to
determine if there is a low -frequency vibration problem.
• If there is a problem, further processing must be done to choose delay sequences
which minimize the low -frequency vibration.
The instrumentation for recording the data on a computer -readable medium is necessary.
Simple peak -particle velocity monitoring will never indicate if there is a low -frequency
vibration problem. Paper -tape recording may or may not indicate this problem. In the case of
Figure 1 the waveform shows the low -frequency vibration plainly. Many times, though, the
low -frequency vibration which causes the most annoyance is buried in high -frequency energy.
Magnetic tape instruments (such as Vibra-Tech's Vibra-Tapes), allow convenient and accurate
computer processing of the data. Paper -tape recording of the waveform means that the
record must be hand -digitized, which is both tedious and fundamentally inaccurate, if in fact
the paper tape recording is a true reproduction of the original vibration wave.
Spectral analysis techniques determine the frequency content of a given waveform.
Response spectral analysis, described by Hudson (1956) and adapted to blasting seismology
by Medearis (1971), determines the nature and amount of low-frenaaenrv, ibration, and iw
effect on structures. Vibra-Tech calls its response analysis technique 'RSVP". Residential
structures typically resonate at frequencies in the range from 3 to 18 Hertz (1 Hertz — I
cycle/sec). This means that if the ground vibration has frequencies within this range, a
structure will amplify the vibration, as much as 2 to 10 times.
A strong peak on an RSVP plot in the frequency range from 3 to 18 Hertz shows that there
is a problem. Such peaks can be seen clearly on Figure 1. This type of vibration is strongly
controlled by both the local geology and the blast design.
In many mining situations the local geology itself will amplify vibration in this fr rase—
range. Waves propagated from the blast may become trapped in layers near the surface.
These trapped waves will resonate (much as the structures resonate) at frequencies
determined by the thickness and type of material at the surface. Unfortunately, most of this
effect occurs near the receiver site (the house or structure). Removing the offending layer
near the blast site will not help, and scraping overburden around people's houses is not likely
to help a public -relations problem! We must therefore conclude that the mine operator has no
control over local geology; however, he can minimize the effects of unfavorable geology by
altering the blast design.
The way in which blast design affects ground vibration was shown in the research project
done for the US Bureau of Mines (Reil, et al., 1985; Anderson, et al., 1985). In this work it
was shown that the ground vibration recorded at a particular location from a production shot
may be predicted by repeatedly linearly superposing (Le„ adding) the waveform from a
single -hole shot recorded at the same location with the appropriate millisecond delaya. all
order to determine which delay sequence will produce the best ground vibration, this must be
done for all delays.

-4-
Our method for doing this is called the Vibra-Map technique. This technique has been
described in detail elsewhere (Anderson, et at., 1985). Briefly, a single -charge shot is fired,
monitored at appropriate locations, to determine the effect of geology on vibration (the seismic
signature). Detailed knowledge of the geological causes of the vibration is not necessary.
Computer calculations determine the appropriate delays to -use such that the waves from each
hole in a production shot will interfere (i.e., be out -of -phase) at the frequencies causing the
problem, canceling them out.
Figure 2 shows the record from a single -hole shot at the location for the record in Figure 1.
WAVEFORMS
AIR
TRANSVERSE 0.32 IN/SEC
_J
/ VERTICAL- 0.08 IN/SEC
LONGITUDINAL 0.27 IN/SEC
TIMING INTERVAL .0.1 SEC.
RESPONSE SPECTRA
TRANSVERSE VERTICAL _ LONGITUD:NAL
FREQUENCY (HZ)-
FREQUENCY (HZ)-
Figure 2. Single -hole shot
FREQUENCY 4HZ5-
The same low frequency is shown to be present. This vibration is primarily due to the local
geology, and proper blast design must be made to reduce this vibration level.
Figure 3 shows a record for a shot which had delays recommended by the Vibra-Map
technique.

-5-
WAVEFORMS
AIR
TRANSVERSE O.OS IN/SEC
VERTICAL 0,04 IN/SEC
LONGITUDINAL 0.06 IN/EEC
RESPONSE SPECTRA
TRANSVERSE
TIMING INTERVAL 0_1 EEC,
D .1
FREQUENCY (HZ) FREQUENCY (NZ) I<REOUENCY (NZ)
Figure 3. Typical blast after Vibra-Map
Note that the strong peak at 12 Hertz has been virtually eliminated, and that the peak levels
have been reduced substantially.
It must be noted that the technique is site -specific. Each operation needs to have the
seismic signatures determined for the neighbor locations of concern. In addition, delay times
which are appropriate at one neighbor location may be bad for another. In such a case, the
delays are chosen such that they are the best possible for all the locations. Finally, the delays
should be accurate for the vibration to be reproducible, and for the best control.
CONCLUSIONS
Blast vibration problems are primarily a matter of complaints rather than compliance.
Complaints are often a result of low -frequency vibration, which is a function of the local
geology and the blast design. Spectral analysis of vibration records (RSVP) shows why there
may be complaints even when there is compliance. Vibra-Map shows how these problems can
be overcome, simply by changing the delays. Where we go from here is to implement these
techniques.

-6-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Part of the work testing the Vibra-Mao techrtintle was sup—rted in a study funded b " the
a rr.....,. Y
US Bureau of Mines, under contract H0222009; The final� rreeport-for-that research is available
from the US National Technical Information Service, as IMS PB86-1758W,
REFERENCES
Anderson, D.A., A.P. Ritter, S.R. Winzer, and J.W. Reil (1985); "A method for site -specific, .
prediction and control of ground vibration from blasting", in Proceedings of the
First Mini -Symposium on Explosives and Blasting Research, San Diego, CA pp. r1
2843.
Hudson, D.E. (1956), "Response spectrum techniques in engineering seismology", in
Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkeley, CA, J
pp. [4j1-14)12.
Medearis, K. (1977), 'The development of rational damage criteria for low-rise Structures
subjected to blasting vibrations", in Proceedings of the 18th US Symposium on
Rock Mechanics, pp. 1-16.
Reil, J.W., D.A. Anderson, A.P. Ritter, D.A. Clark, S.R. Winzer, and A.J: Petro (1985),
Geologic Factors Affecting Vibration from Surface- Mine Blasting, (Contract
H0222009) BuMines OFR 33-86; NTIS PB86-175858, 191 pp.
Siskind, D.E., M.S. Stagg, J.W. Kopp, and C.H. Dowding (1980), Structure response and
damage produced by ground vibration from surface mine blasting, U.S. Bureau of
Mines RI 8507, 74 PP•
P.P� PILL L(�2prry
zNn rooj t_.
40-
3
6,Yu'4) G&I a_ CA4.4- W4CA-' 7HG�
M

DESIGN DATA
AND
CALCULATIONS
FOR
IJELLO TEER
NORTHERN ORANGE QUARRY
FOR
INITIAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE
MAY, 1987
``�trHerreej�,
ti I
,PpOdaeaaeeeeri°
.E
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P.A.
ENGINEERS, RLANNERS & SURVEYORS
SMITHFIELO, LILLINGTON, AND RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

CHANNEL CALCULATIONS
hannel calculations for the Nello Teer; Northern Orange Quarry
were derived by use of Manning's equation. Flows into the
channels were calculated by the Rational. Method.
1 Y --
B
1
-- - W= B+ 2 M Y
A = BY + MY2
WP = B + 2Y 1+M2
1 R = A -_
WP
' Q = 1.486 AR 2/3�—
n
1 V = 1.486 R 2/3 V —S.
N
where:_.—.--.
W = top width (ft.)
A = cross sectional area(ft2
WP= wetted perimeter-(ft.)
R = hydraulic radius (ft.)
Q = flow {ffs)
S = channel slope (ft/ft)
V = velocity (fps)
Note: Roughness Coefficient, n, 0.013 for concrete pipes
0.03 - for channels lined with erosionet and straw
0.06 - for channels lined with established fescue
0.030-0.034- for channels lined with Rip -Rap
1

N
CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FLOW
irYPE
LINING
WATER
SIDE
BOTTOM
SLOPE
MANNINGS
FLOW
VELOCITY
FRE-
ACTUAL
..DEPTH-
SLOPES
WIDTH
n,
(design)
(fps)
QUENCY
(cfs)
;(ft}-
(ft)
cfs
(`fir)-
E--ros.t©net
A
B
;>5
2.z3
,/
/straw
;3 1
0'=
-3.b1
0.03
2:85
3.65
dmax�0.45.
A
B
25
2.8
�/
gf ra s s
0.66 '
3 "1
O'
'3 61
0`:.0�=
2 : 84
2.17
Ero-sionet
.30 ,+
C
D
;'S
2:3
V
w/.st'raw'
3:.1
0
2.69'
0 03" .�'
- =2' 33
3:1.1
dRiax�0..5
C
D
25
2.3
�/
grass -
0�'65
`3 1
0 r
2.69:
0 06i:'
2:35.
":...
E
D
;t5
13.'4
tcrap._
/straw
',3 1
2
:2.31
0 03!^.
' $ 61
3 97
dmax�0:61
�;.
E
D
;;5
l3.4
tirap.
grass
0:$1
s3 i
"2. �.
2=31
006zs F
8'55ay'x'>'2.`38
+
1 .� ,-4. Yt.-
„��?•
-y v�.''.;•4.,k.
.r.
Y ~ -� -
A.K.4i- a.l.
,4�� Say—v;ri
�� .,•
•
.
+!
a
+, q
• -
Yam.!
i' �_1♦♦ '
'� l
r
i -��� 1't-'j
.. �X"� �
�, �:'V
Eros i onet
F
G
;?5
12.5
tcrap..
/straw- -
�::3 ,�
i 2
1..04.
0 03+ 4
} 12 70
3 28.
.O
-
.dmAx=l
_ 4.
'�.
i 4S
..'h .
_
1.17
a _..
':3..1``
=t _
'!'°2,'•
- ..
?
L0`"O&{'}
t266
:1:0
E ros l Onet
4,
dmax 2. 5
G
H
25
71).90
tirap.
/straw'
:.3 1:•.--
6
µ0r25'
= O O y+
"` 71,.Oa,
2:9`
=
2801�1f
0:25;'
-
•14
1 ;76
G
H
;?5
70.90
tara
rass
6
=0.06
�71
f
' _-
025-24hr storm will probably not occur before channel stabilizes

mom m 1 m m m m m■- m o mft m s m m m ■s
w
CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FLOW
TYPE
LINING
WATER
SIDE
BOTTOM
SLOPE
MANNINGS
FLOW
VELOCITY
FRE-
ACTUAL
DEPTH.
SLOPES
WIDTH',-
n
(design)
(fps)
QUENCY
(cfs}
(.f0.
cfs
Yr
,_.}('.ft)
Eros:ionet
• 20
H
B
25
108.2
tra p•
/straw.
3:1'',.
6"'t
0.40
0.03
108.26
3.91
dmax=l.90
H
B
25
108.2
trap.
grass;'_'
3..06,' _
3:1'
6 '.
0".40
0.06
10$.9
2.35
.
..
-
�iY o iti _y h
L . •Ji.
-
? . a /� -{'u tf
r-t ,4� -
�+
•Ti..
s
, -. . f
r-.
- y lv .,i�,-C
,nip
_.
`
- /
hF _,Y..t'7
��
t
St-
ti�
�
��n;
. 3 - -
t-
'�-}'1i k. ii:t .
r f.'
i
L� arm -.eS?
•"�` r. �T
��-'^_4 �
.
_
r
t� # r
F i
3 -'<
.:_ gam, e� ' e k4'yxf..'
f74 rj�.. r
-,n{-•� ✓i
e
. f
i Yf
.. 4
.�
i

■■
■�
■
■■ Mm
■■
i! ME ■■
i /
Table 3.5 b Co for ds Eq�ns for Temp�asy i�el I.iniaggs
max
Type l',iaiag
IC s fd.AgW lion 3.23
Velocity Equation
Erodible Soil - . iradon Baistaat .Sod
.
m
;n In .
a
(1) fBm Bail
.0030
�~ .681 A084
-.§17
V = =8I R.59ls U6
(2) Fsbeixlmi Roving with Asphalt' 7
.960 .. A141 .
960
V- 4145 R-�'� S"3
Tack (sh3file !ayes)
.006
r
(3) � Rosio6 wih Asphalt.. 0143 _
-1.01 _ti127.
-I.0l
V = 39.20 R�667 Sj
Tads (doable layer)
_
-
(4) lute mdb
-
� w :875 ` •
' ..: bas3
� 1.02B ' 43I .F
V � 61.53.1t • S
.
(5) Pam Mat
.0076
_ .0202.
;_.£°. _ -
:5f35 101
=3f35 '
, _ ; ,; ..., .
';,a its s.J.,'•
V-32.29FR1.34b s
.0572
_,' _
,
(6) Swam A Erado eet
(7) M F ipgb-- Mat -3/8"
(3) a Mat -112"
(9) Fsaaion��t
J
s .048 � :546 .083
.049 -b42 ' .084
AdaOid from McWhorter ctmL (1968).
70 . V�73.33R
_646 V =.14M R1.2- S*.. 6
-%4 42 V=41AS R. $•-
ME Imm
{ 1 -f
1i
i
H

BY at-ko DAT SZ
ICHKD. BYDATE_
SUBJECT Aolellp reeol - Vcr6l, e2,Ao da. SHEET No. I' OF--2-
X X'd'a /0 5 f",, JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
DESIGN SHEET

:1
.Ali, Fr r .. ..,..
*reae..c
-30
s-
�._..�... _�.�b.EL�.v,_=,;..�(a•�4,- -S8G -__yo FEE ... ;- . _ i i � .' •__.5•- _� � i ,,,�.—�,_.�
E- -- - - .-_
�.....�.-._�,_.�c•--`--I1 Z,�K-'-��..I..a---.� •-i= -lr ���:{.R°�5`��;(,.1.3�c�1 _ _ _ -�_ , .- _..31i.v...a.�,�. a_..i...._.{.._,�_� .
Jj
} ,-1r _ ..._]y._�'�� •�l�.��--.i.—.»_��.. .._ _. _- � ' J � i_r�..�P, w � _�,_..>_ . ., a...w ._d.._._1E-..... +jl
�' _...,�..,-w_--'�'"'._,q_.,_.�,, _.M.. .�.�,.J.._..� ...�_ ,.._ _:....J �.._.�s 3__..�. �.-,,.,_� _�.. �. ,..:gym. � :..,....: _•..��.,..�. ...., ,
�. :_.�w...Q S � _,��. `LS--�.i_ :_(D.3o��C3:9�.�� �;3ljSS� �� 3�.5(a cfS. � ' t .. ;---�---%---�i`---•?w_�-� - -
T
, "�iF. � � ,G=K>�a'� li�;�• .� � z'�;,i",ti +,' { �• - j -� �� ' •' ;�:"".�i• L .,�,-.� � tiiJ�,.•} ' l i } f »„, Mt
, �,..;,•,.C--�a.�3o'�__��. -,i fir,'. .. •�.'._.._i__�. ... _... _.1. � �.' �" ...-.[-.' .:.� .„_....�
_i
,.wj_ -•S_ t i E_. .r. _r
_ ;•.: -rY.._ fir:..=: .. _ . ,.-.'
''' €._ ' '[, 5,=..�.y,7•,^_/_ham j. �..�T. �.. _ .,.r ..�Y r ,.. .. �..� � � � - .. i. ' .. �.. ___•�
At
BY 7° -CAT 2'87 SUBJECT ; 4 0,�.,r Ca. _ SHEET NO. OF
MCHKC. BY HATE , ,r% C'. / JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

IJ AS+� .fir , {. ._ _ a •} _ I I ...
i f r � ° + •� k 1 !
r ,'- -•�,i ;.. t
1 r� 1LS.
k
,
i
I r i -fit, �� . i { 1 , �"'-..'_._...� ._ -�-- _....i __ r .� _ . .F r s.. •
2 ._!_._r.
-41
P
-
T 14
EI.E.v. 618..-+
r Y
i 4jElev. Co+B' - 3/,S Ft
L. .,gao'ft r
BY� _DATE 5-T-f�7
CHKL- BY --_DATE
SUBJECT AAA -ALIL4 A SHEET NO. OF
Zoy{£_ cA le-, J08 NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
DESIGN SHEET

_ t• _ s � - t —..�-_ 1 - I r i•
�..._.rc
-r ply f{ - -� /// i 3._' ' •, -_ ""� 1
KI
�, . �S i•7 ^ ti �L�Y_'::�,S,s„ �SV �,��� __�.�"_�..,,„, t._ ' 1_. _�... .� ?' ._. _ I _i_.. .y.._-�'
f
, E
4
1 1
s i
■ S Y_..".,.t � � � t 1 , � t 1 - , ; 1 t t ,�E. ._I . 1 _ ....
•-..�..�.-( .��_._i_ .�. _._ l _.�.�. _ ._....Q e'er.. „,} � - 1 _��.-. ._�-.. _.. T.. �.--..» :_ _ _ �_«t... ., _. ,. � _, � ..1„ r _....� .._� -. �
v.:n:,l 6 .y..,+..�.._,.r.�, �n _..p_. �� rv'+. .i- .«.. _. I—_.� t. .r..m 1- �.r. ♦ _. �. _._1 � -1 ... r.l. .._.. �.r-•• C
1,� i-^�-^ i : � •� r -^�f-- --r- 1 -' I ' � ` -i- ' )- '1'—.. i . # _s.._-Y"'•-'!-_ _J.__.. ' _ .- _ . �.... _ .. ! ._..t_ _.. ._..,.._ {1
" Sig ,.. � �...T �-� •..E.-.-.�'«-.,�._, ....`_ i...,. -, ? ... �. _ 1_ I 1 .. " -,.. � # -
I
� � f
BY ' DATE
W,HKD. BY DATE _
m
SUBJECT
SHEET NO.. OF
JOB NO. _ --
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
DESIGN SHEET

,' ,,iY. •.r.,.).^`�'- fir.
RAINFALL:INTENSITY-DURATION —FREQUENCY CURVES
CNARLOTT[• MOMI14 CAROLINA 6REEM3e000, NORTH CAROLINA
yr. :l ytwlFr
M
rR !I r�1
M 1�'iyA1N0e�1
�.
�Q�^o.btlEVrlltti�ti�
+t��a
rrir
t*iti1�R1
Rlii14A
�
.'�■t�"t
t�'.��t�t��ti�tt�t���ti�ti
as
.■w.nensw.,ar
ww
M
of
rY
I
M■ mom
:"M
tttttitiNow"=
t�L
a■.ME■ME
...■■■�
WIN
�«�ill�illll
••7tA�./�tirtttiM
Bill
a��u��v�r■I�■�li�it>•
/ .0 IS N 10 p ION 1 / • 0 • / .1 iA - � 1•
YIIAYT [0 w0ya1
�Frr.
• .x �, `r�i - q MATT[RIS•'MOATN .GIRO LIMA.= , rr, !.• tALCIGN, NOR T N. (AROLINA
F:. .I v'.." s I►e3 •M0 - - Ip7-,[•7..►a3-10lI
ile
�0N
�tti♦At�ti�
-�w.�
■wow
�
O�:�i
Imil
Or��u��.��61
,1
�rrrerwt�r�w�arwrral■�a��.�►�`��
MIN
��NN
ug
�ilt�■�■I����l�It
■
10 •0 W fW ! ! • ! • • •0 �1 M N
e�.aYil• OUAaTfea •W►!
%cq5
mac_
alums
0
11111
.W=M*
fi i�ar
��ww
w�ra�rw�
loll
tom.
�'�"
_�■..
�'"
all
won
■run
1111
OWN
111�11
.0 IS 10 " a0 •0 ►O 1 ! • ► • • .0 .1 H A.
k14uT(/ •OY�aT•e. wpua!
NRCD-Land Quality FIGURE 2!
'7 I)a IAti cl

L
PROJECT: N-drq,�tCoi _ DES1GNEft _
_.
HYDROLOGIC AND'CHANNEL-' INFO RMATION L 3
ON
�kT_4 •7�
a!
R.
4 •-2 �' y - + F ;_ f ['T fd�'�F•
y. [
l
I
z:,
Z"aY z'-36"k
- Z.+
�.+� L;�.�
{..;-:t i' � C. .Z� ���:
,
�.•I.da�41.7��K?. �R1-� Y,`�
,}
OI — 3S.YS cFs iWl 0 4
" y ::...� t �-x; T >3�ocn i
02 T W2
i
J 0, DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY o=y ; ���
i .:'
EL'
s
MEAN
i �
OZ = CHECK D,scNAAGE , sAr C, oo.at oEoo s
,STREAM'VEL'OC(TY ,'
`x` ; MAIL. STREAM 'aYfl OGRY-
,• .
•HEADWATER ;COM P.UTAT.! lbN
CULVERT
_ •
----------
+.ho
W ~
?:'
,. }
DESCRIPTION
0
SIZE
INLET -VAT. OUTLET'_._' CONTROL HW.= H —LSD
& _
� �
COST
o
HVI!
K!
H
dyrdll
TW'
ho
L5o
HW
[ENTRANCE x,rPE)
GRoW�D Fw1pw/�e4d
,l, If
�S
3G"
O�,4
Z
a.L
k3
Ir9a
3:6(0o
3.o�
0,30
3,3°r
3. 39
Sot
SUMMARY B RECOMMENDATIONS 35,s��
veioc�{•S• Foy s.,1*. eel p�fl. - Q S.o2
A
I S z ?}' : 7.47 s r
e

i s
PROJECT. a„� Co " DESIGNER..
' DATE-..
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNELINFDRA+IATlON4�,
SKE'�CH
L1 _
l a.,
�' '°'^., 8..5 `q5 I' 4r z u z.A fr.', •Ra,.X F41I
t STATIOI+I
DPI `1S.g0 7WI, S$L:.00
Cf5 _ �'
L2 _ TWQ
_ �,- _'` - „' -,-„� TW �-�'•
_�... 1.'
D:O�/L } e'er 1
-
777,
:�a ,Tf`
'
"'34 fL.
0, ■ DlSIGN DISCMARGE ,."Y Ois- a���"'
�, +';MEAN `STREAM VELOCITY-'":
Q=s DMff:K DISCHARGE,. SAY O,�.DR QI��MAX:`TRAM
r
:YY=„
Cvf:vERT
` HEADWATtki
;ClOMPtlTAT10N;' _
«>
:lei
,
DESCRIPTION
p
512E
INLETFCONT
'OUTI ETU'CONTROI .,'-l1 W H+ hD.-1;$p}
_,
'W'o
CDST v
r CDMIII> N75
GE
(EHTRaKTYPE)
a
HW
ICe,
H
d�
TWA
GRoOvE►a END
st_E
F :s
=
��
',
in(E}�` e„,f„� j
5
ozo.
'-s
z,a '.-
.2:(.o
al�c
z:�o
0.60
33
;;,
T&
l
—
-
-
I
SUMMARY d RECOMMENDATIONS: 'A'-
?F5 �c Fs743 Fps
r
vwrl
zz
µ '
�
f
t
a • .
iXri .-

S fj3-l. 1 i1 �i',s f •. i'. F� i�i.W {.�� ` ; `Y. �1 A y�`i.�:� 3 � ''t 14.,c.
h 'FIGURE'"-7
100
Ise atflo0` ,��} EXAMPLE { (} ; {2} (3)
iY ( .� >• 7 6 i F
' )5$ .• ' �-`�,�.Y'rl � D 4Z inChn {S 6 Isa}! � f - 3 4
• 1 i"3 6 ta00..z-v'r y?-� J : i
AQ�.IPO I"J= -.t rY_ Fr -=y - n x;, ?a,
5000'
144
SS 000
132 f+� ti FI uclYialicJ`t
st4 ratiiq- .3,000
Z 4 t S
O+-. •3 �� `",� ''' ,�-� E•`i' t +� r (E) ,`�� ^� � Ez I b y 7 4�td ,� � ; , $ Ce��:
`t4
't•x 3. 3.
' . .. ` ;. `*!a ,n rut.• : S'., : -
96 I 'OOQ"
a00
cn
Y 300
LJ
+,w I r !
cy
s IA! 100 f 1 k z
' ls! 48 [0
aQ
41
10L 1.0
IN
;50,. �HVy,::, -,:.," ,NTRANGE
' y A 40 p SCALE, T1fF'tE
►- �6. ' 30 • (1) :r Y 5409(11 edge -with
4 33; µ Q
(E! Groove and with �.
A �0 •, � Madwall x .:8 -9
f . 30 Y 13) - Groove end ;S
27 projecting
10
T �-
I
24 s 7
6 To use scale (2) or (3) project
2 1 5 horlsantally to scale Ill, then
4 use etrolghl Incllne4 lint through
p end o scald, or reverse as 6 6
3 illuetroled. 6
IB •
a
m
L 12 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR.
HEADWATER SCALES 283 CONCRETE ,PIPE CULVERTS
REVISED MAY1964 WITH INLET CONTROL.
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROAD$ JA4 4964,
L
a

•y
' d _' Aft 1 r L`t ,tv v'. f
1 ,
'1
1 . H tJr 4 n-.
3
-.�• 8
..
,L. V � )j S' t t Yak \/F
j
�
•
=
t
.!A r•
- SWN,. SO Stix.. �•
W • T tfe. !v.
- �•sr r � f S.
Iy 5 .
• S- , iC- tf J• s, -�' 1+ f
$u01tERGE D OUTLET GURVERT fIDWIn4 FULL �7 t
# _•
� ti
5 r +� ' ]5 k '
1000
• �
r"
-1 •:
r f ,L s �.r til � HiR H• Re ESo' lir+ �r >: 1 vF� r �
it;?i'� � �
�'tr
_ r r'u ur yfl
f;, �� . a ..
•.
a }>°Na �'n '`}1- .�: . 'rt1 a�l�s YN.}5.
•• r''S.�r.�i.� .
1 ;..1
aaa
i,.
fOf'iyR•rrCrown no Wh111lraia;, p7li puh NW •br
fil `
1�0
rrsHhod•,'dol446od In;{IK{df•ipn`.prx•dw• f
.rd''
k
600
f' r•
B�
500
1.0
400
300
.'
-.200.: .
4
S
A
C
50,
e
10.
B
6
5
4
1
-66��� ,.
-54
49 0.45 o a 4�
.42 ryoo 5° r w a'
i QO r a00 X 6
3fi h �'
-.33•:.,z r Y$t 5 i�,J t�•Y { `*?z�Y'�FAOdhL ci' 6�n?.t z•' '6 r f
-30
600
w• d'
o : 10 ,
24
I
BUREAU 0I PU6LIC ROAD$ JAn. 196$
120
HEAD FOR
CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = v.v 1c
e
I:?

0
FIGURE 9
0 10 20 1 30 40 50 60 TO 80 90 100 - ; -
DISCHARGE-Q-CFS -
'
6
w
w
4
1.1
4�
.2
0
0
0
01000,
a
a
0
0
0
WHO.
par I
a
0
0
0
ME
0
0
NONE
a®om®om�®�
MEMO
■E1/
NEMME®NE
c CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF PIPE
ormoommommor"
Emomommoa■ommom
m
0
0 100 ,200 1$00 400 500 '60wi-- ;•7 O 800 900 -. `-1000 Y;,"':'
DISCHARGE -Q -CFS
0 1000
1
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
-!Am 1954
O
CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF
2000 3000
OISCHARGF-0 -CFS
4000
rD1-r1rA1 r)r7 PTN
.f 1 l l I I V o-% L- 1./ 1._ 1 III
CIRCULAR PIPE

FICURF 10
_FLOW FOR CIRCULAR PIPE FLOWING FULL
4 _ 'BASED ON MANNING'S EQUATION n=0.012
3 .�. Y•i�e ,r ,fir F .✓+ .�I /��/�'� r ,. „Fr �4 �'- y r
� _ S! � siw j '1. y ✓�+,. S } . i r F Ski z . • j• .1 - 1 �
� '� ,�"{C'a�s i *�.-+,r'�',•�'rrf, "�tTnr,�>txi r4�'`']zr � { �L
Ly �. rv.4'4•""`q"�i , � I�� {' ^�# g'i� i' �[ s r' •f4.� f �;�� t, , I i'C _ '
r �,K. ��"�l 7�iJ � y��l � 1'SI�� K; �frx T�T�Tf�ljPi?�5s �f IS�'S} �• '`F j I ' '} ,� � X .
l000.-
.8bo.
LK
200
(01
t Q
100
26
,w 24 -
in
,.l^y cr SQ
4Q �� - 2
w _ 3 0
�w 30 3
"i•r•''n .'L���. ».s++.fk,',✓}�7 r r?:' ' 7�. i',�4 a, vi1
18
20
y.' 10
,14
.12
3- . \A�EA, \ , j� ,o 10.
\ , 7.8
6
. ■ . r -T-�r fir.
4 FT/SEC
4-1 ty
r , j r �
.4f� f f• i �' r }...�.
a`. ; f j f�
I
01 .02 .03.04.05 1 .2 .3 .4 , 5.6 .8 1 2 3 4 5 6 810
SLOPE OF PIPE IN FEET PER 100 FEET
■
is

= r' FIGURE i l
1 4,F t Z. stay s[ �Ir. tits y4 ' 'Ft,,: r . • ' .
�i� t
.:'RELATIVE .VELACITY AND FLOW IN
CIACUL.AN PIPE FOR ANY DEPTH OF FLOW
4'J �! o. 4F �•�4 � � r
J
J � S� I � J..°err}fit S.r�tt•$s-:5 ..e 'a?y rM iy.�,ri�J �) �x �' �"'
-...31 511,t;tF
e'Sr l4ti r � h ,}. �r 'a ?.R;�r41�.-j :x..3r �1,rr"'4.,� „yl�� �riSr, •r 'I i
r�' y�Ft•� ��A�2Jfx�r a}Li r.�?:-rj �,J�ti� �fI'. if;,� 4F ��t S,����i�a��J
4•ik��?,tip+i'b!F e %,I„r :t if. _.l; 5��e ���}a�rF,r 'l:�3:�Ytr7. ti�yf - 1 �..t .-..
� rl�•• r ,y � �?�t}'�ft � Y � a S' ' 4 K 13�s��� � �" T , 8t�,�+1�x's�t•1� t r. a � .i,-` ,! "-�- . I ..- J.: .--t
0.4-.{_-
iE'� q.A -
ti-:r
r r y- r .1 F+ f 4 I. r} �,1•L`•4 'ir`t fi_ • `; -; ., .�»...} _._��.. O
f >tf , z, �- ; ' v`. >` s .v ��'�. I.t f : t f 3, •--,-_l.t�._»_ 111
a
I -.T ,�', � tx °,�. 7 !q: ?%�'`,r �,.��-�:i�i'•F���'�rF � �`• �:,' r.: �µ/..I, {.�' ` j.'. t0 �'!0 �, .:. r
16
1 \
M 1
orn ci
' Q MOIJ :10 H1d30 a o
■
A,

Det`P/rsnn:�ro��O�-S4on2. SiftinSans..._;
;,.. Lis'�
'', �'�-� -jam� f''�•�'�--i:x�.. .�.[ _ ..i._..
-
.�_ "� �/"�,•Q���y .�i� '7;� r `� PSG,- + t •, zA^�_ Z � ifjror-e_,,�7,�7_:_—_f.__.j-.._# � __ .i. _.t
: ,,Y e't{ �� 7��r ! � j r J 1 �I � Y«•� ` 4?J ir: z� J ,p �, -4 .r' •? .- t.:-•:.:; i. � "z
I. or
_clAszkBJ'►R_,p,►'+aver "iss
... n .flo �.�T = U �- - � -�.(r. fA �G..S., ..�...`LsF._.,..�_F? b. n.'t.....5_.-_!7-,_.� 4A c:�:[I /• �. .h /�✓ �...!/.'OA G. � .• i �Y.
4, s �t'1ioc'rf:17..�_FPs,.- .:;._ I_zlg„�r;az �'• :.1—�. .bAC!.�7�_..� _�_.;..-
X J,Z:,'_
-' .•.' �f ..._}.-.. 3 :i j?.ran, , .,'e1Rq't��_..1.�....l.�c„�,�c ✓ i.! 1,..�..t L L+ J V .„..{_W � _:_.T //4.�J � +� ro7 C. � ...... ' .....�.._ '.i ��,�..� .�...'."'.�...+^t"' ' ..�_ .yam""' i �..—�. � .....f _..6. •,• -k ^ t`.: • �, _ _F._ -y- .. }
_r►791CrMv") S+�o@ Sr2L• F»-}y , 4c
1 ,
{,�,f `�.�,��'{y'� x.! �5 t �� sc��•�_i-�''*���.3.V ���iyj�F'rti` >'�';z.r�.� '' r-. trt h` t 44
�:_t�.:�,�
TT i i
s ` ,.#....0 C,��! i ! i RI ;- IZt� ;/Z+M lq er +~�„c r.c.SS� _2Z..SU�ff !on 1-.ra
6"` .�,_� it ,.....�n..{.. `i .�.. � � � _ F . fi�..s y.,_,,. � � ».;.• s .;- � s . ,._.. � �. _..__•.
?• � � k r y E .f... � +� •
_isP.
_. F ....1:..__
Do for. i �4/l,o�e...c `�uarE.i .;� ' ! 25,xZ:o Z,S_
j' ^ •� 1 i � f � i_ I � i i i
tn5_�
t..,,wE.- �M q;t!+.rt✓.n—_.S.rEfJrr•c .s^ one-.: .f.s:'6.._�.}�.�. ._.t. _� ..* �
fF. An - Pna.�•,
BY DATE, 5-2-g7 —
CHKD, BY DATE
SUBJECT CIO SHEET NO. /7 OF
it'�o .Yn :+v�r� nArOnS _ JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
DESIGN SHEET

No ®
. . - .........
ME 00.00 ' MM 0 ,
�...
i♦i♦
..
M ME ■E ME on • hill ME - i♦ ME
Stone Sizes Far
Culvert.Aprons
ESTIMATION OF STONE SIZE 1MO DIMENSIONS FOR i
c
CULVERT APRONS
Determination of Stone Sizes for Dumped Stone Channel Linings
i
and Revetmentt' t ; -
tep. ,Use g.9 to a ermine max mum'stone s ze: e.g�or
-, Step i)
Estimate flow velocity Ye at c ilvert or paved�:ctiannel `. <
't`
%=. �12_fps - 20", or 550 lbs•).,{ _`°' .•':,- '.
outlet. -
;.
stepjli) Use Fig.10to determine_acceptable:sizq•,rarige,'For stone
Step ii)
For pipe culverts 0/ is diamet:r.
(for 12'fps it is 125-500 lbs:_,,for.75S•'of�stone. and the
maximum and minimum range•in;weight.%shnuld be '25-500 lbs.)
='
For pipe arch, arch, and box rilverts, and paved than-
nel outlets, De . At, where Ai, --cross sectional area
-'
Note: In determining.channel velocities-far.'stone linings and
_
of flow at outlet.
revetments, use the followingcoefficients of roughness:
For multiple culverts, use 09 1.25 x D/ of single
culvert.
Diameter Math ing's ;_ Min. Thickness
--- (inches _ n' :'```...of-Linin inches
- ep iii)
For aprnn nrades of 10% or sui!per, use recommenda-
Fine •= i} 4314,
Light o' 035=,
r g.
12
tiof: hi h ( 1 h 6}
Q
g er zone zcaes t rough y
4 t
-_ `
-J
'ZI
c�
S
000
•,OaO
e:
00 •
50 '�
0 '
LP_144�ii4 D; APRON X ;•
Z � Valetklf ilfee!/=.i art{ � °.$•.i
z — --- - '..Stone For Rip: Rap ~z�'sa;e.eee•e� �, .. r
4PRDN MATERIAL Ta Pf1oTECT;To PkEVE'V = --•
CULVERT SCOUR HOLE FIGURE- S � � I Maximum weight of Minimills and rila imuM.range r° iteight.range'of
;� _� LL�. L ,' stone required in wr.i�ht of 75 of stones
_Stone Filhaq tFlna} 3.e DID _ 4 x ll��/ I f
iLl�nt} 3,yD0`_� 6 :+0 ,{lbs } (lbs.
-" {h1ldiuml �4a Do 150' 25 150 w , 50 150 — �—e} ..._ 4 0 = T8 x 3
_ _ _ _ x200 25 .200 I =50 200
(Heavy
257F250 ° 50 - 250
6 — o- .' 400: 25 100 - 400
rb
lt101 sludyreQiiira6ltasr di/aipaFors, Iflllinq 800, 25 B00 s ,2� - WO
�ln ar iar er I 54 - •1;OOD, : 250 - 1.000
' ` �Y ' `325 - 1 ; 300
1.�300' - _' SO.:;,1 i ^ ix� -
1:600 5+1. 1,600, 400 1,61)0
Source: "Bank and Channel Lining Proceclres," iiew Yj6: 11%.-partment 7,000 75 - 2 000 <'.:"s ..' 6n0 - 2,600
rf 'ar.'.iiortition, !?ivitiion of Design uuE tru�tiitr., 1971.. 7,YnO 100 - ;,700',. BOO - 2,70n
:_ - FIGURE IO-acaliun of Ri1 R,Ip _.... _.
,•:�[::�:.:
�f
r:
«r. o.'
FIGURE 7 ��_ -
r.�:
b
•.Mtn •'.:. -. ,.;
=o•
to IS 120
10.,1
t:
::i:�:`�
.......Lr
.......
HE
IV
.e
•�
it
[ 1
:i:)."
a
r:
3•:�it:ip
L'
':.'
rt;:::c...%
,
L:;,
N.....r
::•!i::'iz
FM
tsi:..:::css•...
.r
�-It-
i!�.Ei.i::.'r.:c.�'r:':i::::E�r:i=i=`i
•E
.ri
:••
:s:ef:::E:•
iiii.C••.'ii:i..�.f:::LT1i:C`i:a
..,..;s
......YLLu.=L:-
.;�
.=w.`I�-1'2..i
:
..:r'rE•L�iir;sT
•„..'�•_:_:'
.
s4...
.
.�i•
1 .6iL...:L
..IN
..
'L
.L.'
. 1
r :
:li'.
.:
HH
::::�x
.�.i.••-
.:S
%c.'.'a.
/
..ii�..
S:I`
....L'-::..•...,C....ti'
i=,...�.:.'L�
.:».M.
is^...•'SS::
Y.'�....
--r..+. ..,...w.Ei
:•
!L`•�5'r.«�Iiy
:[i[:
,i '
•(C[LCL=
•e.
..
:E.:..•r...•
e..i,sF�..11r•E.:E�':
'rsi:3:
=�
f
:f• ••!:-.,;
H-Ct!'L'fSf
=:LM[!:
...
::
':i�S.i:•.:L[.'S

1
0
.. n
r
�
ib-
Rv
/
5 f ZL>c7��1
t
S :: s AS
Jr 41 � < �t, a �fr •
Ei S
a
S
c
/uo
.00
I
Z
• .�t�i�rC.� /UC 17.�.-% s- f�//•, ���r-r.� s���'. �i c'G(� d.-7-� Vc%�
A

Dg M sp;Des ,
.Flow eA-r0,5 A, sp,:// �y3_:;__. -rs- .1._._ �,�o, f f�o�,�$�djMx
Vs
.ILIF 151,
. _ � ... .., a - •_•i- -....�...�-. jam.-r.l-.....,{.. .-.�M1.� {..�. � � ��
Y 4 y ! ' •. ...t ... i __ -ice... i W ,. I .-_` ! 4,"" S. �.. �� i i
Prl,�, r#l-yam.. SP' :` ..-r•_
■ _• -`i�2 + .. '.d.n..,:, c t•1P . Co�,,.a` w-t.// /,o..l �_3.G e's_. '@y� s.l✓..fL`
rr � I rr j
;.. t.«.�O_ ai„o . C 1" 1 P . ,. ,R, sc� ;._:w 11..... ! D�_ /3.8_ e Si. �+ 1:. Z. D D �( e ya- �f_s.5'
�. ..�.._..fy _._.1. _._.: .. 3.y,i.'-._y -�. ! .... �,_.,..4•.-�T-•_=..� L-.._:`--.•� --•/ ..-I�i.- }..,.--s»-_'~• -`'._ - .._,3.........i -t ..-.� +.,,.�.,'«... •
E N►ert;enc.,..Lrp[.l.l wa r [ r 1 ! �. i�
^3.3.. S . , is {sre.g.�,'ol- �.oi (F/a',.a !+c o�� _�,_. e►,i ear
FAcrIT-GtC 14r`Y_�rrFF.,c
� S:�;v,,kra ��!'« r ',!, i I s {� i �- !1 r fir!_+`! { d l:,tt;C �•=. �.•ati.[ y 1, �� !n !`,.�',�� �.-'-5-.p•t 4 s ` r= � � tyre. ��
7?f•.�...{.�n�14+..
;
-f
• - t 1 i � � � [ � 1 r
a - � { � l,,►9y ""! � - � i• EM � G6NC..•.i SPir..LUA � 1�. �., ,
:■ }LEY stil _ `t + iNVC;CT.,.1GLCV...fBS�rT
- ; ... �� - �%zr'Ca iDv:r [ ~ } D'►ScRnrSt 6LE-V..i ,7
OTG_i _-D SO. ��i„Jq/,.•l �s�.cl ✓1� (,l�vP ffi. .lp'Z,s�.: _:Co 7, f,0+.11..V.VItl�P G� Jam?-FMQnL _G.or Flul e�1 i
BY DATE - :P'-- "242 Z SUBJECT d& SHEET NO. OF
CHKD- BY -DATE- JOB NO.
E_
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

e,
PIPE FLAW CHART (Full flow assumed) i
For Corrugated Metal Pipe Inlet X. + Kb - 1.0 and 70 feet of Corrugated Metal Pipe Conduit's`t+'.
n - 0.025. Note correction factors for other pipe lengths. � c� •1•
ia.
H
12.
15"
18"
21.
24"
30"
36"
•
42'';
2
2.84
4.92
7.73
11.30
15.60
26.60
40.77.
3
3.48
6:03
9.47
13.84
19.10
32.58.
49.93
711.19
4
4.02
6.96
10.94
15.98
22.06
37.62
57.66'
82 20;
5
4.49
7.78
12.23
17.87
24.66
42.06-
64.46
6
4.92
6.52
13.40
19.57
27.01
46.07
70.60
100.65
7
5.32
9.21
14.47
21.14
29.19
49.77
76.28
108.75 „
e
5.68
9.84
15.47
22.60
31.19
53.19
81.53
.116.23
9
6.03
10.44
16.41
23.97
33.09
$6.43
86.49 ,
123.30
10
6.36
11.00
17.30.
25.26
34.88
59.48
91.,16
129.96
11
6.67
11.54.
18.14
26.50
36.59
62.39
95.63
136.33 =
12
6.96
12.05
18.95
27.66
38.21
65.16
99.81
142.37
13
7.25
i2.55
i9.i2
in.ai
39.77
67.83
103.96
148.21.
14
7.52
13.02
20'.47 ".
29.90
,41.27
70.39
107.88 ..
153.60;''
15
7.70
13.48 .
' 21'.19 ' •
30.95 '
_42.72
72.85
111.66 `'
159.18- ,,
16
8.04
13.92
21.88=
31.96
44.12
75.24
115.32
164.40--
17
8.29
14.35
22.55
32.94
45.48.
77.55
118.67
169.46
18
8.53
14.77
23.21
33.90
46.80
79.81
122.33
174.39,
19
8.76
15.17
;{23.'84-`_
34.83
48'.08
81.99
'-125:67 j
179 15_
20
8.99
15.56
24.46.
35.73
49.33
64.12
128.93;
183 BQir
21
9.21
15.95
25.07
36.62
50.55
86.21
132.13
1BB.36•.
22
9.43
16.32
25-.65
:37.47
51.73
88.22
-135.21
192:76 '
23
9.64
16.69•
26.23'
38.32
52.90
90.21
138:27
197.12
24
9.85
17.05
26.80
39.14
54.04
92.15,
141.24
201.35,'
25
10.05
17.40
27.35
39.95
55.15
94.05
144.15
205.50.
L
Correction Factore.For Other Pipe Lengths
40
1.23
1.22
-1.20
1.19
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.11
50
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.10
1.09
1.00
1.07
60
1.07
1.06
1.06
1.05
1.05
•1.04
1.04
1.03
70
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
80
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.97
0.97
90
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.94
0:94
I00
0.86
0.87
0.00
0.89
0.89
0.90
0.91
0.92
Figure 6-25 Pipe flow chart for corrugated
metal pipe drop inlet spillway
A-1.4
Zr

N
F—snr_�w�tY Sa/Irw.Y
PRD,IECT:
DESIGNER: RZ?17
DATE: S-s-L 7
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL. INFORMATION
SKETCHMCrt�,ty
STATION
QT kI = 3.s�f33.5-crz $.38 �t3
EL. 588
use- -.4y " Rci?s Y ca.
AHW= !.5 ,5
aI - �. s TWI =
-.�--- --�
TW
EL
( Oi:*, 001614 0MCHARGE , SAY'015 l
MEAN -STREAM VELOGTY=
,4 a CHECK DISCHARGE , SAY O,yo 9R Q�� /
MAX. STREAM VELOCITY
tULVE+:T_, `
HEADWATER
COMPUTATION
�}
OE SCR IPTION':
COST
COMMENTS
INL3ET ClO.yNtTe
U/T.oLET/ONIT.R2S
OHW=!.HS.+ h!Q
-1 LSl.
14W
i4.
H
dd+
W
+
h
0D
La
Hw
TYPEV7
}(ENTRANCE
.L`::`,
u�kWjW.oI
0,?
o.zO
.oC
I
y
/to
v�
GIG
w f.�o
21
SIJMMANY fi RECOMMENDATIONS: �.►sr// .4,p
C.,t�r. �4oror7 @ c�f/tt a{ .25r" Rcr}J
1 �� /ttCK JF4t Vt�� •i�/ ''9nS Ovt`
-C�ei.l.gnc.� '/lA. All, Oli`+9 yew S
� a✓wy

I�ne,er,�.s6r•.(A.ie�1.-i:._I e.f.�r�.e�`er__ S.or•!��C
�--' - ;----• ---;_ . ....�[j..��» _._ . _w.» € ..i.� _�... .r,-.ter--• ..I , �- --.. € . _, . •. •
�~ _� •.•-{�q.'Z b�rSTv.J6C Acres,.; �07c: J1a0kp,le
-(1.g..Z�
.�
s � r ,
• - (-....._ �. _.s._ _.. • � �M..._� _.�� ..�._ * g..�...s� Grt �..r.��_�� � �5! 3,SZ� o� _s_F � _w a� k� 3 y8,y. 8 ....c r� ��fvi.�41...
s.._A_._i•4,L jRc'r[r.p:Dnc�__�j''SF" S�" hctM.Cons+rsceu�„�„_pl
rcor_F._�o all 'at�er. ��QrcLro�1'S:
1 ' I
Po' a- ;...:.CfoSS,;.Sw4;t�1,Le�_a- �A+n_:�@,:, ConsefJAti_e_�L_ 6o„I �e.�....�M•s8.`f..2...... _ ...... _. _
f ! ? 1 f 1 1 1 I I
• I � � `r,k^' 1. �� � �''•�ti.t� y`-{1 f F � -
...ddd. S$J a --{ i•. _ � I .� } - -,t •3-
S.F�
1-7
-76
i _•e. Tp+rA ..�AJ4iIn.btt I-SCC�in en�. rS�arA�e. ._ 1T 0 SF f 7toJ;� 3dU F� IL7fooy�la 7577 {�
,1
4--4
3Y9`('j, Cf= NFw Ponld w,i! P.o..;cjc
.� ! ,,',_._. w_�.. AMPLE• ,SEfDlnjgvr S7o <.
BY �P PA,_ DATE J - 7 - 8 `! SUBJECT SHEET NO. z `t OF
�•�CHKD. BYDATE
Stc�•Men i far �- JOB NO.
____._ � -- —
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

I
000©aab NELLC) L. TEER COMPANY
ae•wo� p O
1 -3,0
rI Subsidiary of .4oppers Company, Inc.
zpQ��o�r'pv'Q P. 0. BOX 1 1 31 DURHAM, N. C. U.S.A. 27702
pogOo
OFFICE TEL: [phone] • TELEX: 57-9446
October 6, 1987
Mr. Thomas Carroll
N. C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development �r ,
Division of Land Resources 0r/err
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 l�hv G�, (�
pGy%98,
Dear Mr. Carroll: 0-
AFC
In response to your letter dated August 25, 1987, I am e�wsi.ng in
duplicate the following information:
1) Cover letter and reply by Ragsdale Consultants, P.A. concerning
Items 2, 3, 4a-d, and 7 as listed in your letter.
2) Correction to page 3, Section A of the mining permit application
showing acreages for Items 6 and 7.
3) Photocopies of additional information requested for Section C,
Item 9 (Preliminary Seismic Studies).
4) Photocopies of additional information requested for Section C,
Item 10 (Hydrologic Information).
In order to reflect the changes made to our plan sheets as a result
of your past inquiry, I am enclosing two (2) sets of plans acid design data
showing the revisions outlined above. Since you also expressed an interest
in obtaining a copy of our Environmental Assessment, I have enclosed a copy
with this submittal.
If you have any questions concerning this information, or require
further assistance in this matter, please advise.
Enclosures
JRS/dw
Very truly yours,
NELL L. TEER COMPANY(;
-�
kir�e 6 / - -
James R. H. Sprinkl , C.P.G.S.
FOUNDED 1909

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A. General Characteristics of Mine.
1. Total acreage at__site.
Acres owned 27 Acres leased 142 Property owner if leased
Mr. Donald Reed Poole and Mr. Doug as .Harris
2. Name of materials mined: ._ Quart z Diorite and Felsic Metovolcanics
3. Mining method: Hydraulic Dredge Underground
Shovel & Truck X _ Dragline & Truck Self loading Scraper
Other
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine 120 ft. for initial 10-year period
b. Expected average depth of mine.. 80 ft. for initial 10-year period
5. Area of previous activity: (identify these areas on your mine map.)
a. Area of previously affected land at present site that is inactive and has not been
reclaimed:., NIA
• .fNote: Mine map should clearly indicate any disturbed areas not to be included
in this permit application. Explain why these areas should not be included.)
b. Acres previously reclaimed at present site NIA
6. Present (premining) use of the land (estimate acreage for each):
Cropland 57 Pasture Forest 112 FishtWildlife Recreation Other
T. Proposed land use after mining and reclamation has been completed:
Cropland Pasture 45 Forest 7,� FishtWildlife 1.0_._ Recreation Other -41—
(pit)
B. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
1. Number of years for which permit is requested 10 (10 years maximum).
2. Total affected acreage to be disturbed during initial year of operation:
a. Area used for tailing ponds, retention ponds, spillways 6 acres
b. Area used for stockpiles 5 acres
c. Area used for waste piles 5 acres
d. Area used. for processing plants and onsite haul roads 12 acres
e. Area of mine excavation, including areas being prepared for mining, actively
mined, and inactive but not reclaimed. 14 acres
f. TOTAL a•e 47 acres
3. Estimate the maximum amount of land to be disturbed and unreclaimed at
any one time during the life of the permit. 40 acres
w
3

RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P.A.
310 E. JOHNSTON STREET - P.O. BOX 1749 — SMITHFIELO. N, C. 27577
TELEPHONE [phone]
September 28, 1987
Mr. Jim Sprinkle
Nello L. Teer Company
P.O. Box 1131
Durham, North Carolina 27702
Ref: N. Orange Quarry
Dear Jim:
Transmitted herewith are four (4) copies each of the revised
plans and design calculations for the above referenced project.
The revisions made are in response to comments received from
Mr. Tom Carroll of NCNRCD, Division of Land Resources, dated
August 25, 1987.
Our responses to comments pertinent to our work are attached
for your use when resubmitting the plan.
We trust that all revisions are in order. Should yoµ have
any questions or require additional information, please feel free
to contact me.
Sincerely,
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P.A.
Robert L. Massengill, E.T.T.
RLM/nC
Enclosure
�=_r•:!C��P��Er�=i!f�Jf:a - t...�•,•��.:�`C;iti,Faf_= Af=�t[=:F--11-f�Fl:.;�i IRF
i}..z.ti.i-vtC`.ici
I� 't.11 i '.1. .,rj l.. .11";1 :rF ;li"�4/., �_•!. C'f 4i A ;.0 Vv i" I-' It Ii:.i. fr !Ci1.1 ri t?76f fsll�i�;R;l;

COMMENTS NELLO TEER PROPOSED NORTH ORANGE QUARRY
The following comments are in response to comments received from
NC NRCD, Division of Land Resources following initial review
(August 25, 1987).-
2. Please refer to drawing 5-A for a typical berm cross-section.
Silt fences are to be installed around all berms immediately
following construction as shown on the plans.
3. Acknowledged; Buffer zones have been delineated in wooded
areas and visual barrier berms are to be installed in open
areas.
4. a) Acknowledged; the necessary sequence of construction has
been added to drawing #6.
The outer limits of grading/land clearing is to be the
southern diversion channel. Drawing #4 has been revised
to explain this.
b) We del --4- : n*-e .., 'Oor silt
i fences
- +
. .aw%. .L111_ %A LVL 11L L�nC:eS GD De installed 1n con-
centrated flows. The silt fence at the base of the
downstream slope of the pond dam is to be installed just
up from the primary spillway outlet along the toe. The
silt fence on drawing #4 has been relocated to clarify
this.
The visual barrier berm in the southwest corner adjacent
to NC 57 is not to be constructed in the flow zone.
c) Acknowledged; a temporary sediment basin and channel I-
J have been added to drawing #4 to catch runoff from the
mining area during initial clearing and stripping of
overburden. Design calculations for these structures
have been added to the design booklet.
d) Acknowledged; a note has been added to drawing #4 which
calls for -class A rip -rap for slope stabilization as
required to prevent erosion and scouring.
7. Acknowledged; a 1001x100' surplus material storage area has
been added to all plan sheets. The area is just west of the
settling ponds.

•
i
11
•
•
11
•
DESIGN DATA
AND
CALCULATIONS
FOR
HELLO TEER
L
NORTHERN ORANGE QUARRY
FOR
INITIAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE
MAY, 1987
d d
A.
0
. CCTt"
e r
r
� ®, '�� '•• Fir. � NE�4: y : ��� 1
�`'••. WAY Nt �'.•``
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P.A.
ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING • 1= HO T OGRAMME T RY
SMITHFIELD, LILLINGTON, AND RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

•
CHANNEL CALCULATIONS
• Channel calculations for the Nello Teer; Northern Orange Quarry
were derived by use of Manning's equation. Flows into the
channels were calculated by the Rational Method.
•
•
W = B + 2MY Where:__—._ .
W = top width (ft.)
A = BY + MY 2 A = cross sectional area(ft
WP= wetted perimeter-(ft.)
• WP = B + 2YV I+M2 R = hydraulic radius (ft.)
Q = flow (cfs)
R = A S = channel slope (ft/ft)
WP V = velocity (fps)
= l.. 486 AR �/3 V S
• n .
V = 1.486 R 2/3
N
Note: Roughness Coefficient, n, 0.013 for concrete pipes
0.03 - for channels lined with erosionet and straw
0.06 - for channels lined with established fescue
0.030--0.034-- for channels lined -with Rip -Rap
•
�_M

N
CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FRE-
Q�ENCY
ftr )
FLOW
ACTUAL
(cfs)
TYPE
LINING
WATER
DEPTH
(ft)
SIDE
SLOPES
BOTTOM
WIDTH
(ft)
SLOPE
M
MANNINGS
n
FLOW
(design)
cfs
VELOCITY
(fps)
A
8
25 /
2 b
V
Eros icSnet
/straw
'dmax=0.45
3:1
0
3.61
0..03
2.85
3.65
A
B
25
2.8
V
grass
0.66
3:1
0
3.61
0.06
2.84
2.17
C
D
25
2.3
V
Erosionet
w/straw
0.50
3:1
0
2.69
0.03
2.33
3.11
dmax=0.55
C
D
25
2.3
V
grass
0.65
3:1
0
2.69
0.06
2.35
1.85
E
D
25
8.4
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
0.58
3:1
2
2.31
0.03
8.61
3.97
dmax=0.61
E
D
25
8.4
trap.
grass
0.81
3:1
2
2.31
0.06
8.55
2.38
F
G
25
12.5
trap.
Erosionet
/straw -
0. 5
3:1
2
1.04
0.03
12.70
3.28
dmax=1.0
F
1.17
3:1
3
1.o4
0.06
12.66
1.96
G
H
25
70.90
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
2.01
3:1
6
0.25
0.03
71.05
2.94
dmax=2.5_
G
H
25
70.90
trap.
rass
2.80
3:1
6
0.25
0.06
71.14
1.76
Q25-24hr storm will probably not occur before channel stabilizes

CHANNEL DESIGN
FROM
TO
STORM
FRE-
QUENCY
(,Y r
FLOW
ACTUAL
(cfs)
TYPE
LINING
WATER
DEPTH
(ft)
SIDE
SLOPES
BOTTOM
WIDTH
(ft)
SLOPE
M
MANNINGS
n
FLOW
(design)
cfs
VELOCITY
(fps)
H
8
�
1 `;S
108.2
trap.
Erosionet
/straw
3.1
6
0.40
0.03
108.26
3.91
dmax=1.90
H
B
I 25
108.2
trap.
grass
3.06
3:1
6
0.40
0.06
108.94
2.35
Y
l
2
3: 1
o. ro
o.ozs
S1. S
Z. 37
VG
L
Tr
11-9
J

ro
Table 3.5b Chef -ieais for d... ignsiiom tcu Tcmpormy [2umcl IiaiaX3
Type Lining
Coefficieuts
fdr+$gnatiou 3.23
VekK ty Equation
Erodible Sw1
Erosion Rexistaat Soo
in
n
in
n
(1) am soil
.0030
-687
.0084
V - 22.81 R-591S-U6
;
(2) Fiberglass Moving with Asphalt
0067
.960
.014;
:960
Vzo 42.45 R'66* S-5
.�
Tack (tingle layer)
r
(3) FUmglan Raving with Asphalt
.0143
-1.01
.027
-1.01
V a 59-20 R-667 S-5
Tacit (double layer)
-
(4) lute Mesh
.0076
-.875
A202
_883
V - 6153 R1-028 S1431
(5) EzcelsiorMat
.0572
:585
.101
.585
V-32-29R1-340S351
(6) Straw A Erosiomt
.052
---
-%652,* A8Z
:652
V'-70.76R1A35 s529
(7) F%ergasa Mat - 3r8"
.025
. -.670
.046
-.670
N' -73.53 R1330 S512
(9) F%erglm Mat - 1 J2"
.048
-.646
.083
-.646
V-14.94 Rl_235 S.086
(9) E-ru:ianet
.049
-642
.084
-.642
V -41.45 R.853 S_45
1
_
Adapted from McWhorter et al.
(1969).

�JCiS�inr, so.� trfCS wr G�.� c�rA./��4 E /BASinS
n
u
He T3 HeI'd na
Hr- 12, 11eran
Ja c
e'i fe'r- G
L� LnuT•'+
GV, C VQOrGev-16-
s
{r 8 2rt�e �t
d-1uS r6._CAg55i`re'!edi"
S
BY_ rY� DATE.?' 37 SUBJECT _ Alf/ ref� - �i� r a���� Ce-_ SHEET tJO.r�OF,__,-_�---
(:4J1(rl, tlY -nA.TF_ b ,,, '..'� ,JOB hip._
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

W
14., �AL� a .» U S i l+ 'Y•e C'o n .a / Mt ca�
�ASr�1I Z,y�w�r✓lrt.
C = U. 30
V- = a , so
a ELEV
S _ 4 e4xe ' _ 'SRO r6
L - = o• 0 30 8
1300 �t
p, Yul o.YL7
V�o. o308
•
ALA
Tc +
zc
A = "31,Ss AcrE
Qzs - C �zs � - �O•?o}(3,q�� �31,SS� = 3�..Sy �{s ,
gR5,., Z
C = 'o. 30
a FLFV, = c° I L.- s?c, 3a Ft
L = 7 So Ff
. 7c = Z �, 9
�15
. K - G•S� •
e c LEV = Co 0Ca - S 7(0 = Fo
L
42S y.� r A
Qzs /0.3 cFs
BY__:%_'�: ° DATE__^___ 7 SUBJECT SHEET NO. OF -
Lb
r1-iKD: RY DATE _ :-�/s_._ JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

•
• C = o. �S
a ELEv = Colo S7c. = yy
L = /o So f�
z Zs S 6 A r
•
�.do
k = .0.
a CLE V z Cato - S5p = . So Ft
L = //So ft
T, _ . 20 S .�
� .� !S• 3� AC
= 0. b
. k = D. Z7
Q ELEv. = 6618 - Syv = ZY /-e
L -. 55 o f E
= �.z 9
P- '
k = o•�
n E�ev. _ dig - SPaS=31•SFt
L _ 800 rt
Sr
i4= o."rz ,ac.
BY_._. J-11>0DATE_:Z_ 7 SUBJECT SHEET NO, 7---OF-----
CHKD. BY DATE _='_f--==�c,—, ---- J0E3
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

•
• �=ass
d �LEV= 604-SSc-Y=
r— = 9 Sa rf
• zs Ce,O r� /Ar
•
I
7
•
BY_ —DATE_ SUBJECT
CHKD.
SHEET NO, S OF
JOB NO—
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. I CONSULTING ENGINEERS f DESIGN SHEET

•
8A5 i1h # 4 F1 +JSo �e n or4� SecJ,.,c�t 6gs�, w •t;.� An;. 4t,rc.
• e = 0.3o
k; o. So
A Ec Fv = 6,18 - SG y - sv rE
So f
• zs' Z,gi
A-
Qzs- 102..
• Sg6 FIQ�.1S k ci.v--, G�AnnC� 0.1oa �'c wcs�cr� tt� c or �+t L
c . 0.30
pcLEv
e.cS 3.o t r
A = S7 ncrP
ats = SLS cis
•
BY------ DATE__ SUBJECT
CHKn. AY_ _DATE ---- -- - -- --- -
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SHEET NO,--OF--
JOB
DESIGN SHEET

n
u
•
L
I
RAINFALL INTENSITY -DURATION-FREQUENCY CURVES
C"ARLOTTE, 61ORTH CAROLINA WKIHSSomo. HORT" CAROLINA
�li1lrrr�■lrrr■��■��r
�Emn
����►r�w
.i�r■�rnr
■�r
w
rrrr■,rr
`�.��
�rrrrrilrrrll��\�
�Ia1ts�smwrs�1•ii�rr�"Z�
I�rRrrr■■errr■■r■�rr
��11llr�rrll>•r�11r■����
wA
+� s
re s
ae
Ao
as
III re
oa
;oa
01
O.1
ea
o.
.o.
�O 11 to $6 .0 2040 . f . . v a 10 1a s H a .A 11
m 1
0 .o ao" r ■ a . a v IO I[ A !.
M TTa Aawlt 1011 IIWa! Y+.01.a ..T+OA wOV of
WTERAS.mORTM CAROLINA
Ifef _w+♦
r��■rr�ir����rr
�rgrr�..
NMI
�,n
■i■ i 1
r
_�
rr
��
■r■r■
..
r
trrrr■/rrr■■/rr
rrrrl
##R��w�wwar
r�rirr
1�
I
RAL EIGN• NORTH CAROLIHA
N•05• a... •11 .-Ifsl
LU
};
IIr
G-
I
111
t
I
!`
t
; �—
--,--- — —t-- —�
t_
I
1_
a +e ,e ra w ,o a i s . a i • �o � � e•
�"' Srl ,o,rr.I+O► xw..
NRCD-Land Quality
-7 l 1) n't o e
FIGURE ,2r
rr

PROJECT: N ors^, e `-'
DESIGNER: __ �V^
DATE:
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
7c�. 5
STATION
7= P i 2 - 3(o"�cF: 70,9 _ 3,.vs "rs
EL. SgS.0
i
AHW = 3•S
Q1 = 35.yS��s TW1 = ac.
- ..
�-.r.f
TVV 3,oCo
02 _ TW2 !
EL s
S° �y
-
L = ��
ELS88
01 - DfS1GN DISCHARGE , SAT !02
MEAN STREAM
VELOCITY=
02: CHECK DISCHARGE , SAY O50OR 0100
MAX. STREAM VELOCITY=
CULVERT
HEADWATER
;COMPt)TATION
=
Y
F
a£ $CR IPT10N
O
SIZE
g z
La
J
COST
COMMENTS
INLET CONTT,
OUTLET
CONTROL
+4W=H + to —LSD
D
HW
Ke
H
dC
TW
ho I
L5p
HW
(ENTRANCE TYPE)
i
cD Fwp
/�rAlu,,Il
5
3cp'
U•`iv
z,
o.z
,G3
1,90'
2.`f5
3.oco
3.ob
o.30
3.3,1
3 39
S�z
I
SUMMARY a RECOMMENDA71ONS'•
VelociT �or
f
i��^c eul p�+ler=
A� I,StT}
'),07 Sr

PROJECT: N
EIESIGNER:
ELATE:_. 5 -G -87 _
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
STATI ON
F I o_� {-l�,./� l�As�.� S 4. Z J, d r f P.-j Fi I1
,,
EL, 600
ri
L�J kC f[n�,ory '�J-O
J
AHWM y'
TWI = SS(..au
- --- TW 2:100
L
Q2 = TW2 =
Sp o:oev<T
.
EL.�$� T
. L - �_
f o, a OCSIGN DISCHARGE , SAY QZ5 1
MEAN STREAM VELOCfTY=
k1 a = CHECK DISCHARGE SAY 0so oft 0I0 J
MAX. STREAM VELOCITY —
CULVERT
HEADWATER
'COMPUTATION
=
�
DESCRIPTION
C
S1ZE
& x
u
J
COST
COMMENTS
INLET GONT.
OUTLET
CONTROL
HW= H + ho —LS0
A
HW
Ke
H
dC
2�
TW
ho
LSD
HW
IENTRLNCE TYPE)
�
G9,00 �Ep END
I
�
In iGt- e•n f^Oi
.PIPEy(.
3c�"3.45
o.zo
/.3(
7.2. i
2.C.0
Z•Go
z.�o
r�.6o
3(
3,y
7:L3
I
SUMMARY a RECOMMENDATIONS: !A=
rYG,s$: 7.07 iF J-
�.S,.c fa Flo.-1 'CAPA(,�} Sc� cFs
-
N,/ Clo,7S)�1.13� = 7•�3 fps
t"75 f�3 _ 4c.
= c, z
t

FIGURE 7
1130
10, 000•
168
0,000
EXAMPLE
(1) (2)
(3)
6.
156
6,000
O.4x In;hl{ (3.5 feet)
6
5 000
Q•Ixocft
5.
144
4,000
• Mw
D feet
6•
5,
132
4.
120
121 2.1 7.4
-
2,000--
3
109
3'
'A in felt
96
- 1,000
3.
y
84
2•—
2-
1300
/
600
/
72
400
2.
inn
z
0
60
200
1.5
z
A
54
/ u
100
G
�
48
80
-
c=i
/ /
v
40
----
1.0
- 1.0 r-
u-
42UJI
rn
50 HW
ENTRANCE
o
-
A.
40
U SCALE TYPE
W
LO
X
h
36
30
(1) 54yare adge with
Q
.9
-
heodwall
0
9
4
_
33
20
(2) Groa,• Ind with
q
t,1.
- Q
30
heaerall
i
•8
,e
i3) Graave Ind
8
piollcling
27
LO
a
24
S
To use {cola (21 or 13) praject
— 2 1
5
horlxantollr to tcate (1),1han
a
y{e ttfalght Inclined tirrq through
Q and Q scales, or rl7erle as
6
.
s
3
illa1lrata4.
.6
18
2
-
- 15
5
.5
.5
- 12
HEADWATER DEPTH
FOR
CONCRETE
PIPE CULVERTS
HEADWATER SCALES ?83
REVISED
MAY19G4 WITH
INLET CONTROL.
f1UREAU
OF Plt©LIC
ROADS JAN 1%61

•
`M
•
.=
•
FIGURE
8 .
2000
HWI
.a
' s
to
Snip+ So —
1000
s =
4
SURMER"P OUTLET CULVERT FLOWING FULL
5
•
000
�•
t
+z0
Hw • H+ ho—LSo
For oullol [ro.n nal fubm AryAE, CompulA HW by
6
I
malho4o dOoCrib/6 M IM 41lipn pra[t4ura
600
108
500
96
1.0
H,09A
400
94
300
72
-66
60
'
C�
u-
�O
w
u
54
5p � �
z
_
z
D-46 �-
40
-- �J - �110 Epp
w -- 'i'
AN
3
O
100
Z
gyp°
FF
0
a
to
-`.
42
O ypp
�p
4
L7
0.1,
a
A
36
Op Apo
5
U
N
60
lt
U4
3 3
ppp b00
6
5 0
1-
w
30
bop s
8
40
Q
27
f •
o
c
O -ta
IO
30
z4
J
20
2+
le
zo
a
S
4
HEAD FOR
CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.0 12
k UkLAU
OF PURL PC.
ROADS 1AN 196)

•
3
h •1
1'
I
0
. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
DISCHARGE-0-CFS
FIGURE 9
7
-
0
a
z
H-
w
6 w
u.
_ T
b �
G-.
w
G]
0 100 200 50o 400 500 600• 70o 800 900 1000
ar DISCHARGE-0 -CFS a
U U
14
12
ro
e
6 _ _ dc CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF PIPE
3'
—1 el
9' A! .
40 1000 2000 3000 4000
DISCHARGE-0 -CFS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
JAN.1964 CRITICAL DEPTH
CIRCULAR PIPE
6
5
9

FICURF 10
0
•
J
•
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
800
600
500
400
300
200
a
0
100
w
80
cr.
60
a
50
r-
40
w
uj
30
as
20
a
U.
z
10
0
8
u
6
5
4
3
2
FLOW FOR CIRCULAR PIPE FLOWING FULL
BASED ON MANNING'S EQUATION n=0.012
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
.01 .02 .03.04,05 .1 .2 .3 A .5.6 .8 1 2 3 4 5 6 810
SLOPE OF PIPE IN FEET PER 100 FEET

FIGURE 11
RELATIVE VELOCITY AND FLOW IN
CIRCULAR' PIPE FOR ANY DEPTH OF FLOW
I
,r •� N
ci
LL_
or
�Q\ I O41 a
\ - 4
` z
rye : Ln ►_
a
0
cr
M.
1 i N
O C7 O ci O p O
MOIJ 30 H1d30

� 1
De�er,,,n�rt.o O/f SC.on2 SiaC o. d
'ICar Cr�ver�" iq ron
•
,
Oufle� of"!✓�� e1
7)
Apt-o'n Ifnj e4 = Co rr Do
- �$ fE �/
�� hit s
S�one Site
ti 19
U Sf- 0Ast
Xq
eA rck eS3 %cq i•-E /c"i Apron
V e-',s,?z fps
zone
Do ` bo XbLs r"r m,/ZP/c CJc0/-
= 3' K /.Z5' = 3.75-r
.4 S�--
USe �A R iP qJ
lZ „ 1-.x f kckne 5 5 . ZZ,SC) �f /o Apron
Em@r,e�cy sP
7—
Apron /f nc Z ^ _ �O X �.� /S Ft -J� /ly'4C S{one
J c v
Mt✓;.n�.-. lrt�Jrr..i 3Ean� S.z� - �
Use Cl45S ^ 1 ;f - Ra.p 1Z` lgf rr C,s��eSS /S L�. /Cr.q ra�arwn
BY ��r DATE_—'—=—_` � SUBJECT -1/e/677-- �J._ r� SHEET NO. /7 OF
` JOB NO.
ti CHKD. BY
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A, CONSULTING ENGINEERS _ _ DESIGN SHEET

10
i
Stone Sizes For
ESTIMATION OF STONE SIZE IND DIMENSIONS FOR.
CULVERT APRONS
Sr.ep i1 Estimate flow velocity Vs at culvert' or paved channel
outlet.
S u tii) for pipe culverts De is diametir.
For pipe arch, arch, and box r.,tverts, and paved chan-
nel outlets, Do - As, where A, - cross sectional area
Of flow at outlet.
For multiple culverts, use 00 1.25 x 00 of single
culvert.
k:eo iii) For apron trades of 10% or sts ,per, use recommenda-
tiof: higher zone (acies I through 6).
D
x �
D i�
FIGURE 7
'T
l.t~_NGTIk O'_APRON_
A+'RUh MATERIAL
TO PrtOTECT.TO
P.'<Vc.Y.
CULVERT I
SCOUR BOLE i?IGURE $
Ll
L
r—
c Ej? _5:one F41hQg tF,ne1-
--,
_3a DQ
4 K Op
2 ( L,gnt1
—I_.
3 x`DO 1
�6 , ,o
_ihltdium},
4xDq-I^�8
__(Heavy 1
4 s
.
G_
6s D� I_12_1)
4 Spec,ol study required {ever
dissipai0rs, ,filling
eosin or for cr sl C
`uur(e: "Sank and r•hannel Lining Procecsres,"
New Yje<. 1),:pArtmj:nt
Of 7' r'•porLi.tion , Pivt%ion of Design ind' �oi.•.Iru-(imn., 1911.
Culvert Aprons
60
0
Determination of Stone Sizes for Dumped Stone Channel Linings
and Revetments:
Step Use Fig. 9 to a e_rm ne maximum stone size e.g.. or
12 fps - 20" or 550 lbs,).
Step ii) Use Fig.l 0 to determine acceptable size range for stone
(for 12 fps it is 125-500 lbs. for 75% of stone, and the
maximum and minimum range in weight should be 25-500 lbs.)
Note: In determining channel velocities for stone linings and
revetments, use the following coefficients of roughness:
Diameter hanning's Min. Thickness
inches — 'n' - of Lining inches
Fine '� ,i 0.031 9
Light 6- 0.035 12
Medium 13 0.040 18
i 6,0�4
,0.000 —
i
5.000
J
1,000
Soo
i
2S0
100
so'
FIGURE
9max. Stone Size
veleeur i01 r6e+1sse.
for Rip Rap Be,•r
ee 14.60 C,rxt
Maximum weight of ,
Minimum and maximum range
Weight range of
stone required _
in weight -of stones, _
75% of stones --
ISO
25 - 150
50 - ISO
200
2.5 - 200
50 - 200
250
25 - 250
50 - 250
400
25'- 400
i00 - 400
600
25 - 600
150 - 6DO
800
25 - 800
200 - 800
I,CDO
30-.1,000
250 - I,D00
1,300
50 - 1.300
325 - 1,300
1,600
Sn - 1,60,3
400 - 1,600
.2,000
75 - 2,000
OnO - 2,000
2,ln0
101) - 2.700
6n0 - 2.7O0
FIGURE 1Q-ad;,tiu:+ of Rif. R,,p

Cy
�z�/
•
e
�-
��i�s�
ZJ C
I
/GEC
17 r.
n - 40
13
?o 100
Ilk/
3. ed
L -2
/c -3 s
i
--ti1
c( .1 IV Cc'
14

D,) rn s ; h_jlk Des / n
• t
37.5 cfs + 8.i( cfs f- 10.3 cFs i- -).3 �Fs
• + SB y cFs tIZ. S cfs + 2. B �F� ♦ Z, 3 �f5
SO Js
P rl�lA,- S .// WA
/34. ens H'// Ft.
(00�al A. C1'?'P ' R'srr' w' // /'/o. i
E Mcr t0)'i c s wa
/e,9. S C{5 cX5 = 3 3. 5 C?CS Pc) {/F�.] e'e'je"n )
�a1�e_ .:..Vi-culA1- 1nr<F c
aCr055 orArv� �nS�'41� Tvu/ �y�
1%
r Ode 77-%/
/�.st`x /ov CF ec-, 4 .
•
-
i('2f' Cc��
— - C R F- T_ ELEV.
.
M.1 r•..wQ1 rR._Er� .S!�G_...__ .-
e __7
t__
17 )
6 -47 f,.. W. 'Ae PA Corirol n�
BY �-�' DATE `- - SUBJECT —A� % rPi -,cJ�, fi, or ����� SHEET NO.— Z' OF.
CHKO. BY DATE _ -JOB NO.-----__
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

a
7 '-7po�y
S�J•-nrn
6qS�� Sao,%/wiz/
o/[S�S�s
7. �n7.7r •
?. ���•-1R
.
1
{/o'✓ BZ,zv c/s @
N-
`
�Or,
�a� �/'I/}
RrS�♦ C�i/�
T/O� x gZ.LJ CFS ��
l,`l FE of4,,,! �F"f Z-7)
t.ne� t�
S •� Iiwq
.
/02,(, cli - Pi2 c�S ZO. (, c�5 re5 w, ecj 74D 1%0a AfouJ 1 e. e'5 [7cr SP,
\ '7 L 1C
�..• � � e L -";:
�- � /I .o :L r TL•� `� _ I Y��IP Y I f i —
V P-'j z O eX
w t�
c s /Aja
•
To{c j
do..,b•,rJ f/OW
/Oet C/S /0W.i,
c/5
`J
77 0
FIN
•
/ Eicv SLB.Z
• IJa}�: `F I�Wn� c�e5i5r 4�re5 (n^zSj (y-Z7, r 5ed
7
DATESUBJECT SHEET NO..-- OF_ /
CHKD. BY -DATE_ �_ww!il_ [?r =: _r^_,_..__.�s�`f� JOB NO.-------
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

dh
PIPE FLOW CHART (Full flaw assumed)
For Corrugated Metal Pipe Inlet K. + Kb - 1.0 and 70 feet of Corrugated Metal Pipe Conduit
n . 0.025. Note correction factors for other pipe lengths. J,
4H2ia.
12"
15"
18"
21"
24"
30"
36"
42"
2.84
4.92
7.73
11.30
15.60
26.60
40.77
58.12
3
3.48
6:03
9.47
13.84
19.10
32.58
49.93
71.19
4
4.02
6.96
10.94
15.98
22.06
37.62
57.66
62.20
5•
4.49
7.78
12.23
17.87
24.66
42.06
64.46
91.90
6
4.92
6.52
13.40
19.57
27.01
46.07
70.60
100.65
7
5.32
9.21
14.47
21.14
29_19
49.77
76.28
108.75
8
5.68
9.84
15.47
22.60
31.19
53.19
81.53
116.23
9
6.03
10.44
16.41
23.97
33.09
56.43
86.49
123.30
10
6.36
11.00
17.30
25.26
34.88
59.48
91.16
129.96
11
6.67
11.54
18.14
26.50
36.59
62.39
95.63•
136.33
12
6.96
12.05
18.95
27.68
38.21
65.16
99.97
142.37
13
7.25
12.55
19.72
28.81
39.77
67.83
103.96
148.21
14
7.52
13.02
20.47
29.90
41.27
70.39
107.88
153.80
15
7.78
13.48
21.19
30.95
42.72
72.85
111.66
159.18
if,
0,04
13.92
21...,.,
31.96
44.12
75.24
i15.32
164.4U
17
8.29
14.35
22.55
32.94
45.48.
77.55
118.87
169.46
18
8.53
14.77
23.21
33.90
46.80
79.81
122.33
174.39
19
8.76
15.17
23.84
34.83
48.08
81.99
125.67
179.15
20
8.99
15.56
24.46
35.73
49.33
64.12
128.93
183.80
21
9.21
15.95
25.07
36.62
50.55
86.21
132.13
168.36
22
9.43
16.32
25.65
37.47
51.73
88.22
135.21
192.76
23
9.64
16.69'
26.23
38.32
52.90
90.21
138.27
197.12
24
9.85
17.05
26.80
39,14
54.04
92.15
141.24
201.35
25
10.05
17.40
27.35
39.95
55.15
94.05
144.15
205.50
L
Correction Factors For Oahe Pip".. TLengg th3
40
1.23
1.22
1.20
1.19
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.11
50
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.10
1.09
1.08
1.07
60
1.07
1.06
1.06
1.05
1.05
1.04
1.04
1.03
70
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
80
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.96
1 0.96
0.96
0.97
0.97
90
0.90
0.91
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.94
100•
0.86
0.87
0.88
0.89
O.B9
0.90
0.91
0.92
Figure 6-25 Pipe flow chart for corrugated
metal pipe drop inlet spillway
A-1.4
I
i
7r

jcr_-^ -uiW, 4za/1wAY
PROJECT:
DESIGNER, Pe
DATE:
s`S '8
HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION
SKETCH
E,r.fr�y
c,�Y kr _ 33.s�fs 33.S�Fz =3g {s
S.�
STATION
EL. S88
se 14- -may „ Q�;'s ti �G
01 = T WI =
AHw= /5
T w
02 _ TW2 =
t Spa
�... L - /Oc7
EL
0j a DESIGN DISCHARGE , SAY 025
MEAN STREAM VELOCITY=
.0= s CHECK DISCHARGE , SAY oy0 oR OIL
MAX. STREAM VELOCfIY
CULVERT
DESCRIPTION
(ENTRANCE '"PEI
0
SIZE
HEADWATER
COMPUTATION
x
� i
� o
j
COST
COMMENTS
INLET CONT.
OUTLET
CONTROL
14W= H + t1p —LSO
0
HW
Kt
H
dt
do D
TW
hD
LSD
Iiw
G roO✓rc� <.. e.{
u/h"J"4ll
s.38 I
-'q
0.73
/.Sr('
O.Z.1441'0
LS
I,s'
LIJ
Ly
/.V('
7-w
OV �o nwC ic/
? ^A [If
777
SUMMARY 8 RECOMMENDATIONS: �ns�q//r ,P,;o
-C/i�� C.//r�� oC' ��7`/r74 v{ Zvi Ec?s

0
0
0
IV* 7'1" fit 14,n Z,._ P_,
'y"c -mcz' Per c,/, e c/ �Q/ '15
S*Vv, 4t d 14 c I- k-,p : (f ? /A,,
9. z ell�
A.c' e:-' - -1 , , L�) ( q 3 5`' 0 5 r ) ( 0.0 8 35e41.8 er /- &f
A, :3,q(j Actr� p-,%J .5 be. cwis4r�ct4tc) pr- or r- Pr lb ? le r C—t' 40 11 .5
Ponot Cr ass consetAk�;, pool elov,
scaLF
v
�r--
-rV +,r � A Q A � � A 6 4 1, S C C) :, I , � 5 fo r A � �
YOU
LG e4
C�'ooc CF cr '. /VtFL')
B Y DATE SUBJECT SHEET NO.---�2 -YOF-
CHKD. BY DATE
JOR NO.------
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET

7
f'r'� �Jrr-[ta 5��.�a. r� •C. ✓u I �I riC F"-n
O • S Acrc - me �� cr c!• sl r6ne( /qc re re-IL,,•�eol for
Am JG1•�i Ejrr� /GCS
�4C �P•-nfjclrcr/ SfU.Mr'nT 6'9./�1
q25-4,0 SF o.a${t _ 33/BOZ.��CF her�uir�c�
r`—IT
li�K
Sie ij
3}�,iri
"�7'^�SN',��1i���dki�•, .h. la tip' ��tn
•
SW ri
i C72o7S S�G-7-.wJ i0o#��� Ar,,�
((a
5F
sc...
To+4` Avc, 11., ale <ec1, r c Jt
S }or `�� =
�8 to � 4i3
�oU +
sit,
r •� �
v
B Y ••_.__DATE.._
CHKD, BY DATF
SUBJECT
SHEET NO. OF
JOB NO.
RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN SHEET