Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210415_W-Woodward_RDUAAFrom: H. C. Woodv To: Charles Roe ; Snow. Chris; Emerson Barker; Ernestine Durham.; George Matthis; George R. Hess; Grea Hoit; H.C. Woody Woodward; Mallory Martin ; Mark Schwegel; Robert Finch; Robert Hinson; Robin Hammond Cc: Wrenn, Brian L; Patterson, Dwayne; Delli-Gatti, Dionne Subject: [External] Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:31:39 PM Attachments: RDUAA rebuttal to Thompon"s comments re only serve RDU 202103 27 signed.pdf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Folks: I want to share this with you in regards to the comments that RDUAA appointed Board Member Dickie Thompson made at their the March 18th 2021 meeting. Then some 3 weeks later RDU Police Force shows up IN FORCE to protect 286 from Mountain Bikers. All the while they are losing $10,000.00 of dollars closing their satellite parking lots since the number of airline passengers is down. Thanks Woody H.C. Woody Woodward OSAPAC NCOBS & NOSTOS Veterans Programs 10304 Whitestone Road Raleigh, N.C. 27615 919-803-6856 nettybuzz- (@nc.rr.com March 27, 2021 To: Wake County Commissioners Durham County Commissioners Durham City Council Raleigh City Council Morrisville Town Council Cary Town Council Apex Town Council Senator Wiley Nickel Honorable Roy Cooper, Governor Darryl Childers, Office of the Governor Roy Cooper Ken Eudy, Office of the Governor Roy Cooper RE: Comments made at the March 18, 2021 RDUAA monthly meeting Greetings, I attended the Raleigh Durham Airport Authority (RDUAA) regular monthly meeting on Thursday, March 18, 2021. This meeting was the first attended by the two new board members recently appointed by Durham City. Towards the end of the meeting, as normally happens, each board member is given an opportunity to make comments. On this day, Dickie Thompson, who was appointed to the RDUAA by the City of Raleigh in February 2012, said the following: "It's a great deal of responsibility [to be on the RDUAA] and the decisions we make in our Board meetings and our Committee meetings affect a great number of people that come through our area every day. And, you know our forefathers were very wise, I think, when they set up the Charter for the Raleigh -Durham Airport, in the fact that we have four owners and two representatives from each owner. Each member is appointed by elected officials. BUT, once you become a member of the RDU Board, you no longer represent that individual body that ... appointed you to it. You now represent the RDU Authority. And, the decisions that you make, are made on the best interest of the airport itself... I urge you to, in making decisions for RDU, put RDU first in making these decisions and not base your decisions on the number of emails that you receive from individuals or people that are in special interest groups, or even elected officials...." Mr. Thompson's words are very concerning. The Raleigh -Durham Airport is NOT a private airport. It is NOT a private business. The Raleigh -Durham Airport is a public airport owned by 4 public entities sitting in the midst of a metropolitan area with many surrounding public communities, all of which are greatly affected by the decisions of this public entity. Public money, taxpay money helps support this airport. Mr. Thompson's words indicate that he feels that the RDUAA is totally independent of any of the owners and any of the surrounding communities. He is saying that all decisions can and should ignore the needs and concerns of the airport owners and the NLew, Public Comment 27/Mar/2021 Page 1 of 4 surrounding communities. Private businesses may be able to operate independent of the public, but public entities must at least be considerate of the public that they serve, the taxpayer money that they use, and any decision that will leave the local taxpayer funding the cost of fixing up or cleaning up issues resulting from their decisions. As I did not want to jump to conclusions about the truthfulness of Mr. Thompson's statement, I did some research as to what the RDUAA is and what role it has. I reviewed the 1939 Enabling Legislation (that ultimately created the RDUAA) and amendments and did not find any direct statement that said that the RDUAA was to operate totally independent of the owners or the surrounding communities. The Enabling Legislation indicates the four owners are to "jointly" establish and maintain the airport. It also says "Said cities and counties shall each hold and be vested with an undivided interest in and to lands so acquired, owned, controlled ..." Vested means to have a legal right to or interest in. The Enabling Legislation indicates the airport and lands are "occupied for a public purpose." These words and concepts contradict Mr. Thompson's statement. The RDU website indicates that "The Raleigh -Durham Airport Authority Board governs Raleigh - Durham International Airport. The cities of Durham and Raleigh along with Durham and Wake counties each appoint two members to the board. The Airport Authority is a local government responsible for the development, operation and maintenance of RDU." So, the RDUAA is both a "board" and a "local government." Per an internet search, I found a generic description of a "board" and then followed the logic: • The board of directors is elected to represent shareholders' interests. The board's key purpose "is to ensure the company's prosperity by collectively directing the company's affairs, while meeting the appropriate interests of its shareholders and relevant ct�kahnlrlarc " • So, shareholder and stakeholder interests are important and are something that should be considered. • Shareholders are any person, company, or institution that is part owner of an entity. • Stakeholders are individuals or groups with an interest or incentive in a venture's success or failure. • For the RDU Airport, the shareholders would be the owners (Cities of Raleigh and Durham and Counties of Wake and Durham) and stakeholders are the surrounding communities. • Thus, the RDUAA should consider the needs of these groups and not make decisions totally independent of them. • If you don't agree with this assessment, then please explain to me and the public who does the RDUAA serve if they are not serving the public? Special interests? Private business? You may say they serve the "flying public", but doesn't that include the local community as we a good portion of the business at the airport? NLew, Public Comment 27/Mar/2021 Page 2 of 4 Per an internet search, I found the following about local government: • Local Government is the system of locally elected members representing their communities and making decisions on their behalf... • Local governments are part of larger communities. In this role, council members should advocate for the interests of their local community to other local governments and communities. Along those lines, effective council members are responsible partners in government when they also take the needs of neighboring communities into account, • Local governments were designed with the purpose of creating order in ways that serve the general public democratically. • Effective local governments provide overall quality of life for the people who reside in their communities. • Local government serves a two -fold purpose. The first purpose is the administrative purpose of supplying goods and services; the other purpose is to represent and involve citizens in determining specific local public needs and how these local needs can be met. As you can imagine, there is quite a bit more on the internet about what a local government is. Everything that I read included some wording that says that the local government represents the people and considers the needs of the people and the surrounding communities. The local government does not act in a vacuum, separate from the people. Essentially, by being either a "board" or a "local government", the RDUAA should be making decisions on behalf of the airport, but in consideration of the needs of, concerns of, and effects on the local communities, both the owning communities and the neighboring communities. Per the Preamble to the 27/Aug/1991 RDU Ethics Policy, STATEMENT OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES BY THE RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY, "The proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials and employees be independent, impartial and responsible to the people..." and "...that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government." Being "responsible to the people" means to consider the needs of, concerns of, and effects on the owners and/or surrounding communities. If the RDUAA is permitted to operate in a vacuum without being "responsible to the people," then there will be very little to no public confidence in the integrity of the RDUAA. From comments made by several other members of the RDUAA, I do feel that there is willingness to engage the public and consider the needs of, concerns of, and effects on the owners and surrounding communities. I am very thankful for those voices. I hope that Mr. Thompson's voice is not allowed to overshadow the voices that do conjure confidence in the governing body of our local public airport. As I have said in several public comments, I am a frequent traveler, having earned lifetime frequent traveler status with airlines and hotel chains. I very much want my home base airport to be a great one. But I also want my hometown to be a great one. The relationship between the airport and the community should be a two-way street, a symbiotic relationship. This airport should be part of a community that is great to fly out of and it should also be a part of the community that creates a place where people want to come visit and live. The only way the airport can do that is to consider the needs of the surrounding community, especially its biggest neighbor, Umstead State Park. NLew, Public Comment 27/Mar/2021 Page 3 of 4 In the past decade, the airport has become so narrowly focused on being independent of the owning governments and becoming a "world class airport" that they have become indifferent to public opinion, the greater needs of the community it serves, and the will of its owning governments. It is this mindset that propels RDU to essentially cannibalize a small, environmentally important tract of land that is remote to the actual airport but adjacent to Umstead State Park without consulting either the public, the owning governments, or the neighboring state park (which existed prior to the airport). Destruction of this uniquely located forest tract critically needed for environmental and recreation reasons for a mere fraction of a percent of the airport's projected needs is not just bad public policy, it is an indifferent disregard of the greater needs of the community it serves. This mindset also propels RDU to attempt to erect an unnecessary large, barbed wire fence along the border of Umstead State Park and other remote, surplus land that they manage (but do not own) — land that is part of a wildlife corridor and adjacent to a highly used recreation corridor that benefit residents and visitors. The decisions made by the RDUAA and the RDU staff should not be made in a bubble that contains just the airport. The decisions made by the RDUAA and RDU staff should consider the needs of and effects on the owners and the surrounding communities. We have to live together as neighbors. The public highly values both our public airport and the neighboring state park. This coexistence is such an important concept that even The Regional Transportation Alliance (RTA) RDU Airport Infrastructure Development (AID) Task Force (which was created by RDU) cited this as a finding in their January 17, 2020 report: "RDU may not be a natural partner with Umstead, but it needs to become one..." The RTA recommended that "RDU should revisit the entire 2040 master plan given the reality of an adjacent, beloved state park." https://Ietsgetmoving.org/priorities/rdu-funding/ Thank you for taking the time to read this public comment and thank you for ensuring that we not only have a great public airport, but that we also have a great place to live which includes protecting Umstead State Park from an unnecessary/unneeded quarry and a fence. Sincerely, Natalie Lew Cc: Dr. Jean Spooner, Chair, The Umstead Coalition Cynthia Satterfield, Deputy Director / Acting State Director, Sierra Club Blake Fleming, Lead Organizer, Sierra Club Cassie Gavin, Senior Director of Government Relations, Sierra Club Rosa Hodge-Mustafa, Organizer, Sierra Club Hwa Huang, Group Chair, Capital Group of NC Sierra Club NI-ew, Public Comment 27/Mar/2021 Page 4 of 4