01-08_1_Redacted

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
Raleigh Central Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION LOS Mining Program DATE/TIME f-f /8
NAME H=rS E/wA44-W T REPRESENTING A.,aW.
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Central O>Tce is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have
the responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day -today
program obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a
day in advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be
accommodated. Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 P.m.
Viewing time ends at 4A5 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may
view the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by mine name or permit number, as
appropriate. The number of files that You may review at one appointment will be
limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if
time permits. Cost per copy is 5 cents Per copy. Payment is to be made by
check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4. Files must be kept in the order you received them. Files may not be taken from
the office. No briefcases, large totes, etc. are permitted in the file review area.
To remove, after, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in public files is a
misdemeanor for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with GS 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior
to reviewing files.
MINE NAME / PERMIT NO. COUNTY
1. /-122 tau/L�,wa�rn�r 6lvtiarty BcA�Ll�ivit
2.!y-Oir ,ones vn,uv fr
l49 A.f-/P' 053d
or Business Date Time In Time Out
[ ER11

C - w
Martin
Marietta
January 4, 2018
Ms. Judy Wehner, Asst. Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
North Carolina DENR
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Notification of Change in Signature Authority
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Dear Ms. Wehner:
Brian K. North, PE
Division Environmental/Sustainability Manager
This letter is to inform you that effective immediately, Larry Roberts, President of Martin
Marietta's Mid -Atlantic Division, will assume signature authority for all future permit applications
for the Martin Marietta facilities located within North Carolina. Larry's office is located at 413 S.
Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409. His direct phone number is [phone].
Please distribute this information to all interested parties within your office.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (336)
389-6616 or via e-mail at [e-mail].
erely,
Brian K. North, PE
JAN 0 9 2018
General\Change in Signature Authority 1-4-18
Mid -Atlantic Division
413 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
t. [phone] f. [phone] m. [phone] e. [e-mail]
www.martinmarietta.com
JAN 09 2018

It Compete Items 1, z *0 3.
■ Print your name wd addre on the reverse
so that we can return the card to You.
Is Attach this cad to the back of On mellPle se
.. .. - . - 0 YES. emorosly" 00mas lHlox: ❑ No
MR JAY NIVENS
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS
8701 RED OAK BOULEVARD SUITE 540
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
�����������������������������������������N��� J ❑aenamwo ❑n �.
❑ISawfo Two
❑gM1te�ve Mall^'
❑MuI161pMun pcyfpkJNMry ❑oorIerq Mall MpVb!
9590940307305196310699 - ❑c.nlnaa Mml naseeacoexwy ❑sn�m padPiN
0 CaIIM onoeltuwy MertnvMM
'2 Mtltle Nwnlwr marvarer aom aerNaw /eeeQ ❑CMNcten Oelhwrpaabba gMwr ❑een•lurt ConMnea»+
t.. 32711'"
ywnp�iadeuY�eiy i I l °p�"maeco or iy
7013 2630 OUO1 8998 '9327 . am
PS Fops 3811. A7 2015 PSN 7saDes-eeRaWe 71 i_ w 6 — J a 2.� t T Oomavtlo Return p«alPl

Martin
Marietta
Mid -Atlantic Division
413 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
tGPE=, :ISlEC' RQ
NC 274
VIM Ft
M6. JunY wenner
Assistant Mining Specialist
NCDENR-Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
US POSTAW
$00.46.469
F1rst-Class
Mailed From 27409
0v0a2016
032A 0061012330
27699-163 299 1Alhb� �Il,hldrmh61111r9,hlpglrllh16un6t9Pr1�

Wishner, Judy
From:
Brian North <[e-mail]>
Sent
Friday, January 12, 201811:31 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy
Subject:
[External] RE: change in signature authority
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail].
Change the address to Greensboro. Copy the engineers on correspondence but address everything to
Roberts. Thanks.
Brian K. North, PE
Division Environmental & Sustainability Manager
Martin Marietta
413 S. Chimney Rock Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
t. [phone] m. [phone] f. [phone]
e.briannorthCalmartin marietta.com
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 201811:29 AM
To: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: change in signature authority
EItTERNAL MAIL
Do you want me to change the official address for MMM to Greensboro or just change Tiberi to Roberts? Also do you
want me to correspond directly with each environmental manager with permitting documents instead of Roberts?
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
919-707-9227 office
Judv.Wehnerdlncdenr.cov Email
1612 Mail Servioe Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1512
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Mining Program Website:

• Complete Items 1. 2. arM 3. s"""'"
IsPrint your nama ervd sddreas on the reseme gent
so Nat we can returnlha caN to you.' • MNeseee .
■ Attach this card to the back of the mellPIOM Mryrsned/✓tine) G D e Of
or on the frond If apace permhe. S
t. Adkb Addinced m: p, b daM'M eddeudlRearitenm Iten 19
. -_ .\ NYE4 aeaUelMryaOdea Moe':
MR SAY NIVENS
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
8701 RED OAK BLVD STE 540 ©�
CHARLOTTE NC 28217 `
9590 9403 0730 5196 3109 58
E
PS Form 38l is April 2015 PSN 7510-1)2 M Demeeec Retuoi Recent'

Fr"
Fbttps:/Tq. nc.gov/about/div_isions/enerciv-mineral-land-resources/energy,-mineral-land-permits/mining-program
C. Nothing Compares_
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

_- _ - - - - -� �I
I
/ I
I
\ I I
/ I
C) \ I
AD I CD
A.
�� b
i o 1 -{
/ .i3
a1
m
O
��
D_
_
A =
m
-.
>
ZE
11
\
N r
I_
/> s
m 1 m
�
/i
I
d
-0(D
­0, A.
-t m n
Oo' d
/ I 57o — — I I '.; b R G U-
/ �560 ,fl, Q n C. _'___�
i
I 0 a xO
\ 25' Buff r % _� os's � : y � c 1
\ / - — � G= � � \ � C ) � 25,Buffer S \.
o _ \tri
'
2- / a N o ro
I'T' / R � / // / \ \ / o \\ \ rt i I w ro £ u1sr.4I \ � \ / (9j '
'� o / / \/\ / w5 I � \ ° I C�I I0 14 � � to9
(D Gn i a. � / ' \ \ 0, E- W \ Ipp Pt \ I w 91 .. U CL �j I -
_ '0I - 11 a
f �6e-- / / �/ \ (L �o c \' \ � � ___ N / / ram_
v 04
v�i ✓ ae�- / / / 1 I p 00gg5� .. 1\ \ Basin #2' 4 o N �,� � I I
1 �- \ \\ \ " \ ,'t j \ : v � / / ' r bay a - O � ,� I I
\ 99 '1 O A \\ ry to C I
m 11 .
w
Iy '\ I rt - -
\ `- O mp .i Hn O I I
/ K I
\ I � , J n ro Nn,_p' \„ 6> `ma y o I
\ nA
--I �5 l\ o n a R o top 0 , I
1 J ` w rt C CT a7 •�. IO--I p0' 1 �i+
S II 8 9 �_? <
1 'p \ a o _/ � R oo .. 1- 1 I 1 t�'
5� I 1 f % o �' I ` -- 1 1°
/ \ r9 dd a �K o �y
/A n C �� 'O ^ Im] H I Cr
Ilb
— — / It a
f�i �Po F0 C r.
l �� I_ 1 O, 4 610 Fr 1 �. O
IIII _ _ _ — �`° I `° � I
�'
S I� I
\ 1 I x s � I1 y
J�
y \\ 0' u 1 V pa /Ike ��
\l
YUCD ,\PI °� I I 1� o• �� �� 9 j
' ( N\
�� \�� _�
J w
7
( `` -1 o I' // � I r
\ I 1 \_ `�
/ 1 --
I — I ( Vj \/ �BY. -
S .'
\\ �< I I / � - / ems/ j 4 II sso T /
1 i f, by n o ess a i ,'�) I I - sso
b 1
n
w a
1
C� 00
7 pd �.
� ro
C1 CO /0
V I
'^ ;'O
O
Ci/. o
` ? d
oo y.
k k
N �20
O ^
q rn �t
n n
w
w
8
a
O
9
0
y�
,�5•.T.'__•$
'Ffl
m
1rVtA'\\l�.'
FONVO.LE RD
RR
O
��5?�
M
p
�o
w
F
K
y
0
O
7O
y
��
.
f�
0
n ...o
m
w ?!
N
N In
w
m
0
C
it1 N
UI
6
d w
(n
,'J'
Orqw g R. m
m
I0
m
m
�
<m
So
g>?-i
a
.
Eq
b
mm
CD
a
m
W
Cr q
O y gj
CD
N
CD
> R. P P
m
O
'U
N
N
r
S�+'.'O ''i-
0 0
'.i
1�,.1
y
F
d ��w
o
0
y';
43
S'
cD °LW�
a
m 0, to
d
CID
, O h7 N
8 n
u'
O
a3
I.
C)
d
nY9
n
-r O
U
N
ry
CA
a 0
n m II
. � PD
IJ
v^
�/
O^ \
.
o
S-
n
CN Cr
8 4
d
L
yfoCfo
ga
Z
R.
m
m
s �
�)
'Y7
R 0
m
8i
(/]
a
o
aN
A
m
rn
�>
1I
R (i)
A
A
Sao
S �
a x
�
In
0
?
22
OO
II
W
Cr O
T x
I I
. "
Om
o
v
v
o 3
3
�-
OF
A
A
gm
s 1 , ��A1 \_ _ C /
\ �> 4 - -CD
\ S'17
I '-
11
\ �
°�
9 \ 1 � �� 4 /'/
l
� I �1 A / f '/ `F f i �� _"' � 11 I u� r
l �, 1
Y � r j � i �st a /
/.� ,.—
\ Aga �' �^ / �' y �� �� \
0 ' /
/ o _
\ ) R I / / " / o ��
a
'Ili
\ �' o� / ��� - >I m
( /
e� �_ ___-Z C I- l , I ��� I � f Y
�\ � — — 4to_ t= y \ \ ° \ \\) NI \-� � \ 0 5- <<, 1,�� i f� 9 f / 1 i
... / \\�\
_L-
-N
0 6 -
d_ CD / I ,,, 91 E: �4ro A �v V \ - 3 0 zs° // I 1_I �I\�\�1 �1 0 `v f' ��` `° I �C
S �.. / �� C y � = \R � \ \ \ \\\ \\\ e� -) 1 �I� , (tr, . A� �' I�'\ ST ��I \1 ` i� I 1 �� ) 0 w ), 1 CD iD
\ / I o 1 1\� f ` 1 \ \ \\1 \\��( \o ay� 1`I` (llrl q� II O ,\ 1 L11 SE I / 1 t �� - 1 >3 f/
I a s 1 �-" /' 1 \ �\ \ \�`1� o �� o y/�J g (/�I I�o�E 1 I, �� z= \ 1
\ ` 1 � �=
\ I CL _ _ .
\ S , /1 ( _
1 J �. / ' I I �pc \ O [J �' .... \- Q / (%�'',I I \ J ! �� f1 .; -� / oo 0 •• \ pY9 Q �/
00
1 I Z E v �' _%% ,, y ! �� - - Q n ) ' 44_
�E/.q �� ':�' w \L,- \
1 N
( ��
'/ /_� , ffi m � J -- f' E' o U r 1 w /-'� i ,--
GO \
, I � �i � \� o o In 6/ \f "-"� ( /
_ -��—
Cj �/ ?�� / / 111 � �I / \
\ �� / — _ �
I� N /Og-
/� �'',V ��\ti / \ n ._�f��� / / /�.J A
i � I / I �'
I��e; \ 0 9 t!. -,' 12 = C 0 A� _'� \ \ "\
-I 11 � S "_� ,-X\"
O A_ �y '� ^ �� r
I I r � I 1 I/ I � �f \\ ` o ( - -\
N t'nI) ' \ . I O�000v n C {S� \.. \ \\ , ` \ \ 07 R c v. �\ \ �Sj� j
v,
I _ _._ See " �^
_ .�- rt ` �J C: C
! I r y \\ , \ G � � / 1 �� >v l
� � N I // / / ' w : " _ ��1 1 \ \� n m Cr \v 8 � / \ � \ \ r �_ � _, � ' r /Qy1�,
w ° I / \ I�t 1-d .� 5 °e O ,, I I --W , 1 _t U `c
0 am
n �� —
F I ) /� / / / ,�
I , \
Y. " '
I �� 'G l rr w = ;xr�
1
I - = I 590
�� )
ar J — -
I `n 5
C _ /- /_ " t- b -� i r' � J
/ C O I a.
J w {- n
II \ \ � v. PO ro .I� / w
_ � � � � �7 P_ Id � I mam
� 0 ' / I i
A
1 °° / \ n
I w
v l' \ f N w r, � �;. it _,._ �._ -; -i
u- w
O.
(II
A W N ^•
O
u+ n l G
3 cn
Z 1 m I'm O n o
Z
v0mOrI>IvOO
c>ifxmltom1
ivx HJC»
A
p.I%-
3�m3Zi3Z'-1.
,..I
„ZO]OY4
A
C
Ci
mmt0mamamm��'OZ
Zl0 EA(AZ-1
O
p�OmDall"I
1H-I ..� � T
N rNi-I
�<T� -i 4ZlmzO
m
�pmra?mtmil3
Z
m
<mm
^I
Z
-i
.Z4zp�
Z
pmm
w
ij'mr(n>
Dm 88
mwm
N
mo l".I
<��mOmm>mT(Zi,
9mp
pm�p�
N
1 m
m 4Zi
m
�X(>i1ZZrxT11
p T
DmZ'oo°
>x
m
>
Z
to m v
�m
�
Z~mam
-i Z
r
D
o
(A LA
p
Z
TZa(/1 D p0
r (f
I n
0
O
-1 7>O O> m- H
O; I..I H m
"
(A x
-1
-1 3. 7 Z
vv
S
m�(('A Xr m
13� >
m
1 m
Z
�
m
_~
E-ii =
,�Ioxy
�Fm-I
30 p
-4
ZZp
m
>
T to N
1
vp
C)
(D
0
3
w
Q
O
0
O
C
0
I.
m
0
m
0
D
O
0
_D
0
0
P
A
W
N
III
0
f
n
-
11
5
N
0
0
m
O
O
N
O
0
D
r
m
A
O ".
0
N
O
C:
C:
0ft
0
0
3
i
o
M
S
�
J
°
c
°
a.
(A,
>X
.vm
m
a
ns�cNTm
>
A
c
>
n
((l
i
c
A
p
;
w
�
n
c
o
N
O
N
0-
m
D
n
m
$
N
-4
V
W
,O
m
CO
A
W
r
(A
'O
A
Cm
0
N
V
(71
IV
O
W
V
D
A
m
D
m
Aw N.-Z
=22'MA 0
m i
N
O
DDD
'
K0,o
:9 25 KV
NKz�
= z 3 m
,_
m 0 0 1
c^4Z
m0 nG)
D .0 0 0
KZmm
2 z = m
<O
C Mai m Om
K VI T Z
Z rO
�4mo-
=CCz
on,P
rn CmInZ
A m z _
2
> m
Ln
m
j Z22
m
3
m A
p
p
1 j 2 Z
0
m 2 a
m
v
? omu
m
,mm
3�m0
C1
z"z°
7
(Aoff
Om Or
-
Z
S-40°
0
mm
~
C.q mN
x
`"
7O
2 z
O
(A
3
p
g
0
3
O
Dm
Ca
N
z
m
ff
m
J
m
U
A
W
N
?
c
0
N
m
s4
0A
O
OW
N
NO
N
00
mS
•
A
At0
UI
J
p
m
m
rn
rn
fQ
B
m
m
o
m
9,
n,
o
O
A
W
J
J
A
O
w
f
W
m
,
tT
u
N
m
N
w
m
0
U
-O
m
m
N
C'
:
C I
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
I.n
g3
N
A
A
N
W
N
N
m
m°
N
N
O
m
O
N
N
U
5,
-a 3
so
Am
Am
Am
4
1wmnm'nw
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
g�
�i
S'
mA
m
m
m
m
'�om4R9a
°
O
m
m
OjNmU1-W
N
O
5
Ti:
A
N
Om
n
A S H
N 2!
a 0Q \ 3
x N
NjZ
! D
0 t
/ P
`* m
f A
D N
Z = \
A
c
C
5�� � M A
O pZ
,
m
n
� m
\ MM'
Z \ MM� ?S
D \ wzpp
id
<u -
IT' yy_IF 2 a
\� WEM M
MyMy :2
MpjMM=M -
r-. ➢-IN U
MMzMR MM=-.
N -1 n =1iu T, YIt1;
= r / MM�MM=Mr -
;N YV I
�MMzM+
i MM uMW
o � =YII��IIp
\ �
' A n
M� m
-
I \ D
O H
C a
F. �-
0
0
w
g-
t:V
It'
n
R_
N
e
z
Cn
a
GN
CN
C- -k- - _moo \ `\—
� �� �� � � v - Z /
- ' \ ' � ice. \ , �\J
\ I ----_
� ���� �� w �\ ^ gip z°' —� / /
� / \ w_� - — �_'__ _-�
\ ,. \_/ \ /
ei
/ `\\ ,\\ ---� /
\�� 2.E it
\ 1
_ - '� � ry a _ i ^ rt oly IOU' Buffet -� �� \\ � � � � ,�01 /
v / � w m cam/ / 'v .J m / r1. O fp
M / � ��m.E' �4O Vf O ro "n 1
O R'�. 40 ro
L ���0� g^`5 zOaro� o"
a
nl / '�/� .a . l
1-1 f I b�p , �' C m (w� Pr � 615 pm � � / r' 1 n
/62 R a. w P p W- 640 m a \5 )� \ , 7 ) U �q
7y '2ullst�� I,_ l y - G\ W ❑. r 1: '(' rt O I .0 g / + E�+. i
I� n. c 1 (11W. G _ I -� .. .t. n O- —
0 �+
ri
tt��- _/ \1 \ I I 0 \\,, -_Z_:-- �90 p
/ ` ~ JJ —
�»
Un
d r ,te a I -0A- s ` �J �� /
j �.
1 I
\ \ o J '? I -\ —\ \
11 --- -- -- f y 3a / 1 \ \
°
z
O
-
N
C
a
n
0
x
m
-.
m
o
CV
1°
n
�
0
.
D
n
.
N
I
n
n
.
3
�
�o
n
w
m
5
O
1
I
m
�
0
0
=
e
..
m
�
J
0
0
f
o
0
W
,o
p
0
p
3
3
�
O
z
N
N
O
m
3
3
p
� I
0
0
Z
V+
00
3
7
^�:
a 7
I
o
L1
r) 1�
M�
U!
,.
m
Or
O
o
o'
°
m
Z
m
I� A
3
O
A
(D
,P
3
N
,IZI F...
H . a
O
r-
<
D
.) --
O
ot`�
(
z I..�
LEI
o
'+ r.
n
C)
o
r-
rn � .
�. .
n �.
r+ 0
1
\
0 - _. ?i- , '/ )
_ _
_� _ \ , - r I, (\' � , � � IP \1\)���` > ��� 1 L � 11 )! � f\/ , --0,°' � \ 1 1
Florence Rd. -- \ \ / r n FA � � 5 n G ��\ f�1III) ���� \ �/% J\ 1 `� (--�
7
� (,-- �X) (� I ��) �
\, � tip" /- /- >/__ �\ = _\ � w (( � F /ff�l��, j/ 1 ��//�% _�/ 1 �\
CD ,1 i. (/ I / }/ ( 0 III \
f \ / / '�
\ >
- / / a 1) \ r N � "CZ� o f \\~ �' r `
y\ .�
_ \ �- J�
/ I';,, 7, \ -
En
�`
r j �� goo �� �1 a
ro ro \ o :9 tC
i
1
\ _/ / / \ / O e. % , ,O�C'ti8 11 A WryR °� o ( I n
/ / \ / j7. O
•'T`Jb � " / rn n 0 p
\ // 131)
o
\ \ \ / � \ / / /Y o I / / / / / , \ - 0 'I, 1� I
�, , / r p t
/ _ ",- �l2 .� ( \
v \_ A , / ) I / _ _1 � -I /1 - -
v v v ' � ' \ �� / � � �' /^OS9r/ �� � 1, / - '� �` / ^ --- -
\\ \ / \
v — — — \1 � 11,.,11 / ro �' 1
/ \ \ j i i p.
7-\ � GQ
�a
vvv � �� v / Q / ...
o
/ , � � � ,' / F _v I � b v� / i
° �`
\ r�
/ _ o 0
V \ / ' �� �� �- ' / / r- - - - , - I � _� /
'� / /� I 1
7 0 _Q YB \
\\ \ a� mz ) o 2
\ // 1 \ / / �\ \\�\ ETC \ - I / � 1_/
/ �f I \
v �� En� ���
i\ \I \ I / --,- ka / Ej CD
` \ `\ \
l ` teRad '� i_I Pl �o �I�'
\ \ - -
\
\ / \
�' v A
v / / 1 \ 7
� v / , / -� A e-. �� ��� -, _< � — � , � 8
cn
\
\
\ \
/ \\
___<
I/ / \
\ \
\
00
�
C
j-r7
m
I
<
.Zl
:O
= 4
'i O7
T7
O
<
ti
--I
(n
s
D
D
.V
y
z
m
z
z
,�.,
a
"
O
T
z
L)
z
O
�
D
„
r
m
z
U7
O
;7
�
m
�
z7
O
__
m
OC
Z
[0
W
-0
_U
oD rn
`2
O
07
%0
OD
<
O
m
lu
-1
�
O
D
f1_T7
D
O
Z
D
�(1
3
3
71 0
I j
r
N
U)
O
O
O
-oo
z
N
m
D
m
�
'
3
:z
A
z
D
(n
<
a
O
<
z
II
1
0
I
s
0
n
`
II61
0
I
I
�
a
II
I
I
m
0
La
7
2.
�M
19
i! 9•
1
4
1
1
t'7
in
N
W
r
1.
.
,
1
1
1
1
�SR
• Ma
SJ A
P 1O m
O =9 L.
ja 3 99y
�
3`e
I O
G y y G
V O
v
�.s�
zw
{
m N�
gg
fit^'
s..
j
0
-
-
-_+
\ \ / / \ / \ ^� I .� .ice- ( f� �'
/ � L-_\ f °
/ V � \
"
/
/ I )
"
V
ra
C
m .
u*
��3"
R
-
n-1
>C;pC»tip
Ip 1O a
3.4 y
s?
c
1
F
<
y
-.
Z
a
F f
n
win ul w:,
o
w
O n8
Q
$SSN
O R
Q> l
I�c3'Z
0
4�
N
y
�9>p
O jn
D:
on: o'c
v w a n
w In
Uj"o
wVI�
o
1,
.Z!
U A S
Z'
W S O N
c S
0 0 O
O OIL
o
�.
-
o'
'o
I`
a
Nc
, i f -
>
.
W
m
(n
g
o o'n
s r
uIC
0
w
O
3
N
m
.^�,
< 3
fY
rI
d
a
�x
H.
3
O
o '
o
o
Q
o
i o
o
N
A
FL
o
�•^
P
$ 0
3
3
m
o 0
>
>
0-
3
.
3
3
C
0
v
y 0
y
y
Z
O
'e
n
�
I
o
O
S
N
i O
O
F
c o.w.
tv
m
m r
1
0 �° 5
O>
c
m0
y
S
y
$
I
�.
e
O
F1 0
S.
0_ o' 'o
y
o
•
0
o
yn
Iy�
V.
'
o
S �.y �e
Y' w
o
m
:i
5
O Y
y M
*
p_ y
.
O ;
S
d.
l
m
>
♦ -
n
7
3
3
D
S H
o u
2� 8
d p
T
77
�y
n f o
m
c
O
o
O 9?
a T a
--2 o
Z
3 <_
• 1.
IY S
S
O
O
,�
i <,
S
o n
m
v'
v
v A
y '• o
T
c
o
fn
0
_
�^
O QN
P
n d
3.
S
§Q �
032
4'_a
O
O
M N
M
o. 0
R
o
o a
e a_
a
n
a
o
n 3-
yF
E,
o
3
�
^
�'
s
O-
R
m it
R
d
3 n
S
O
i1.
o 'a
9
n
pe 0Or
Q 3
3
O
S w r
o
n
C
f
o o S
4
��
� o
u
-
- 8
0
m
m
v
H
z
n
m
v
C
r
m
T
0
A
>
r
J1
7v
>
'i
11
11
i
F�
JJ
I
1.
O�
•
I•
i•••
• • . ..
•,
••••
1 11 I
;'
!'
• ••
�,.
5 •• •_ I
•, SIB �,,, •.
3
•!? ii
:.?.1;.:
I•j
A
g
5 T-0 A
rosr ao• 4 j�jjj-
Lq
S EE
WTW,
D ��'
m�ZIv
> +,
0 A� 1•'-24 FLLIHt FA•NtL
3v E
O N 9 R a
r1 x
p .'
y > N ,1
11
om o
(Z1 q Lz F
n 5 G
z
O
q
N
>y-
T.
m
A>
N
--���
>y�>Hy
S .R-
E-
O
xx�
A�6g
4
as
9"ga
' -'
-_
.8 ��
-§
ja
�'
i
s30
S
>
'gd
4
r
a 11'
m
a�?.$
3
3
§
p
w
N
9
U
m
m
=
44
�
F
JD
Z
m
6
§
7�7t�1
IL=1I=
_ III
•1��-1��1 n=n11
e �11n�1�
u=`ii'=`n�.
_v-T

I
V
j / ) �
- - - -. --- - --- - — - - - I
i �
/'
I I
E4 � ,/
I I I
� I CD
a.I K t7 _
-� -
`o I w \ � - - - - t-- ------ I - -
0—t
I / � IDo I
/ (P T 0
I / I'd" h a
," I — I O 0. p
Aso-- I � v o - C.
-- - I n E x y /
;-
\ 25' Buff r \ i
G
n 1 7 — — , \ T R 81 m r
/ \ - / / "/ \ \ yp \ a w pt. I I° v 11\ c# lnszg +a / 9
Vi _ / / / j \ \•r;� �1 i 6. I G fit �� 1 - __ IT, S III _ ' N 114
, / Jai,- y I / 1
Rn
t \ \\ \ N \ \ I `./ v o n. - � w + I I
tih \� � � 1 ` ro 2I Ai
r ,� I I
\ - sao \ N C d � n C) ��II I/ I
'� - cn n - I" 'ZO roO / I I
\ I ° \ I n ro N�� a ?o1 - nn $ 9. I
I � o rr \\ ( �t71 o Z0 b0 ,o�Q 9 ; e � 7g a,
wG on row k°a0
/' -
V I, a I C) nn c. o
--I �99 - � _ 1. d� / / � �� CI < 11 I V, ���
l �0.
- �,< n I . � �� O i7 ^J — �, rn� .r / -\- — I 1
c
zp \ i
ro I 1 ;, � ,.ate � n
/ r9
dd � N °�,-,,�o
- CL I � g a / y I x; �
f CD
/ p OF.g
1 1 (;. / %%
\/ / r I z � 9 C 059 I 5 � I � i:1
I � °
1 J,
% �4 \
°
CL
I I I - o$ a '0 a /wy
� � = � ` ,f- 610�0 10 I C L+• I
`I I / \\ I I , `� I ° N I
I ( I 1 q0�' 1S _-... 019 1.
09
�� _
� ) ) I � , 1" o � f ) \ Z ?-k _ --, z � I w � �� �- I
Ir� I I _m s �' 1 �� - \ I � 't,:� I / < I
�� / lz7 I a L �- p I ,r I O 1 /
w �, o 07 \ `-\fir
n. 0 \ I o&) 1 r, ���.��°C\ 11 6 "Ill
-) C� �1
\-- I �, r3 I -1 -� — j
\ I f ✓ __ _� _ — C
j I
V ��� �" � � I I r % y i �/ . A\ -, 1 = f
es ��650
z
0
w
O
m
0
kC
4
EL
0
A
...o
n
r
��+ A
G ,w R n N
N
C
,- C,
a 9��
V) o 0o c
o
r4, O Ci'1 O
m
w
D@
W A ,5 !C]�.
i
c
,m
V)
CN 00 OP R. R. y
0
' V N y p P
'O `03
pi C,��.,-
zD a . y
b
m
m
J
<y
O O
V)
n
(D
� � d C=. Cr N OR•
rn
-
3 m
.O rt rt°
m
m 0
7J 5 c p
" o
Co
at
rD
p
co\ °N° /� p `� V
�
O
r.
, 8 '- m- C.
o Cl
m
m
m
N
O
to
w
O
A n..°7 p
o
m
U
5
0 by
r
(v,
. �- * 13
o
5 o
Co
.�1
_.a'_..
to N a d ry w �.
0
, 3
rn . v w
"- n �%J
��-/y
0,
�
° 1,
(p
W.
n
cn
O
yy m n r
m Y
v ,,
n,
,
N �o' C7 0
c.
- - _
O n 11
a '2.
F-
tTl O t'Yo 1m1y
M
U
U
W
C3
" L1 C
�?
N
� r
��
o'
N,__, CD V) w ..
m ° a 5 N
� a
C7
o
,J
o
���
A
i 4,
y--1
V
z
Us
�y
r
7 Rp
gv
<
V)
a
.
5
m
m
a o
po
n o
m
K
.
I
In.
CS
Us
O
G\
G N
p
N
mM
A
m
rn
,,W3
v
WO
9 C)
�
�
2b
x
m
9
Q v
W
W
5
-. o
m n
i
ED
II
W
,
_;a
G
o
>
�m
x
11
"
O N
O
Q ,
U
U
_3
�,
OF
P
P
MI -
R
N
(D
J
rn
U
A
W
N
m
.
a
(3
O
O
W
t0
A
O
D
N
p
N
p
mm
.
oG y
I,
rn
m
o
m
m
m
rn
�
U
c�
rn
m
o
rn
m m
O
N
p
N
�
W
J
J
�'
O
b
W
U
m
U
W
N
I(1
m m
U
o
o
m
m
ry
�
m
m�
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
o
so
<y3
N
U
A
U
A
O
N
U
W
O
N
U
U
U
A
O
�5 0
� p
033
& N
a�
��
Us
mr a.
mf
0
o
O
o
O
O
o
o
gale
�m
rn
m
m
m
m
m
m
rn
S�.
m
N
m
U
N
W
A
W
A
U-�
N
W
m
J
b
(D
N
rn
N
W
J
U
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
?
`� p0
. V I�� (%�, l� I /I t7' p A , 1� I �� ��� �'v s �� �� \��� ��I��1 _y- - A"`v ,Ov \� �2z,m- _�
Cl, �`a \\°' o \ / / i 111 / J ,� \\ �l-' �_ . 1 \ ,�.. i�� / , � / I DD DO A S �
r ) z _ / % J � 2a a � � � / � �� DZ >m K
co A � _ / I a4 I ! . / h=- , Fri =r �11 \, /// 1 n 3 z 3 -
v \ l rj L / ° 1 I / — oOI r ;n0 i �, ( 'd / i y 2
9 � /� � \- � � /�$� I \ /e, /' �° � / C) � \ l)) a �------- ¢ow0 p
/ ( / z
1 , / �/ I / `� D C O '+ m
�s� \1 ) \ ` \4 a ro_jr) o 1 J ` ~ f//v/� �\ 1 /I(' J ' \ 1 ( A `I c z s� \ m
_re /\
\,. \. is / --t\� \\ �) 111 I;1 � o S- I\ ��\ )l I I f �9 i O-�,? m yw
C \/ - -' ..� \ l �I \\� =1 C ` i1, \ aw \\ ,/ / 1 �, \ ° ) I r- � '� O C z 0 G D
�4 - O _ 1 �d�� �� k A� \ �\ v \��- ��C �: �� ���� f �� �� v 50� ��% �� I � _ 0, C H 0 :x �� A
N 11 (
r \ oy/ I Q\ _ \-�\ / 4� Ill I / -- 1 �ovz O
\ \ N I --I (f� a \ \ `\ \ -\ \ �� N ° \�% / �I J �, 11\ ^ ,.�I`� . '-_: lTl r - l I m C D - Ln \� ,o
(�p,� ppV 1 1A.. 6 `�
ps � I � � v \ 16� �'� - m m z m
I �. m -i r A K
��
---� I I n ,y n \1' f '� \ \\\, �� � \� o# a C dq J �q� " ro( � , i _ (n m z v v Z tl1��o g
I / A I Oo h7 � 1 \ � � �, � � V a 1`�A � 1 � � � ` I L,-,� � ", v _xA 8 D I D '➢ 3
I j
g .-� \ \ \ � P _i o f o v'- w x 1 ,z, H m n m AA=VA
\ / �I \ 1 \ �� \ \ \�'� oo a N \ O �1� O p I _� z � = \ m m 3 3 o G \ �D� 3_
F
0 \ A �G.o J t r� F. r_ I,� 3ym m m M4
-� I �I I \( �\ \\\ ��\\ _ K - �. �( /_ {I �, Jpi` _ / I I -��`\ _ ) _ o b t;n -1 a y G \\=:4�II�. L
/ l / I 1 �, �' v\\ -� w E; ,, � 7� 1%^� �� \� j- J 1/ aau � y / `� 0 a� pvs � O 1-�1 � �J 61 ; 2 � 2 m /� � . I I 4
`^- A / / �� � �� �J. �. O w -::.. --_ , 0 i (r \l I i / V �r ✓ . 9 N P'3 W V a U1 O m O r I � �_ -=,
t / /) �_ \ A , —�— �\ \� ��. \ - \��1� t��V����/ ��o p z���� I sus m \ .�� \ I Gz� z o i i 1111I-t
sl
\ W 'N �� �� oo t7 m x 620 f� 7 9 1114E-,
/ / \
\ � / / 1 �� _ / _�. � , �... i/ i _ / �'�° / �,o� \ �� r / / / n z 14� �U-I!A ,l,
-,��<
— � / - - \11� - --:-- �� � (( / I -� r -�- z - I 11 .// -� X) m
t�l
l i!' v \ \ & \ // n / 3 0
CS --�,
vr m /fie i /�� �\°,- � �i� m � �o °nm /� _ _ \ ? z
- _'� - _ A
I-
�-1 y\ 'b \
1 N , I / / \ I 0 `�' o n --1��"�. �'&asp 1 `' ,., \ `° \\,- �k � \ 0 1 _ -
jo
80 � m �, t
-S 1 N XI
I CD
/ CD c I � / / Al m D 1 ` \'�' J .. _ p\\�-_� � - \ D - ~ a. rt m , �� 1 \ -��- ��� `Li �_ m m
— y y
// / //// c ! - _ - 579 -� rt 1 \ Pa
y. \ r
I �oT_— —
I I // y O m y a \ - /
I -i
n � E - rt
1 / , — -
% _ f , n - 590 � � J l J f \
II 1 = O- - _ -
/ . — 0
-� - �.
m p - -s- ` /
_ '- � � �� � � I = .lam �,<
, uI --�, (k Crt -� � 0 �-j
��
w 07 / R ',. C7 ( "CYa- V � -Boo_ -�— p_ CD s �`
1 - \ _ _
1 I ` \ \- �JC' w 09 / l P p y �l -(—
p`\ op
I t17 0 , I - - IT I , :3 n
CA j '� , V II \ A °' a .- � -
�, m ov O I o . \ "rt ro - 1
t \ CD J w II - � \ V A��-,- ( R. n t '
S ,,, > S C7 d- - --L ry r '
\ - n T ( n , 100' Buffer `` \ \ � � ( ro `D 0 ��
. _ `� d
- _ _ Y}f�Yf p- --el, 0 431 1 �i �- � :. Z o o d �\ 1 � f � z ° o K \
/- �yyn4 L / ' v� B \ _ ✓ n Imp -14 ° �P
/ / �2� \ 1 _
g n — ctl . Q aao 0
It Q. - - / I 1 , a a��ytas�x� ^ \\ \ \ A \ J' �N m I r o �° �� E W G • ,� p -m Cr `_-. _ _ ---
- \
7 �
aQ I C Ln \ \ . - I n \\ \ o I f • __ _ �, o »^J ,.� �l n
�+•
- CD
/168
l r
9 - c
�o
1 c _. `f J
' ' \ O G "� a ° / , wtw�,�. � F, 5" d \y `� 1 J () \ v` \ \\ �� \ j �; ' 7l'� \\l
. WP 0 1
�� o I
�v J ° ". � o 9'�� � \ \ � / V�
l ) 1 /
ao0 Cl ` \ \la ng,52 /n -m = /� 5 - � \) �� 1 I \ � \ �\� \\ �IJ� ` 7 ( \� ~ \
r � - 33 a t (/, // \ � 1 \ / `�11
o•
yn
w N
O
vOmOr1aivOOnmm�°m°>°
so
cn
H
Z H- T Z 0 7°
C
mm/°mamamCn���OZ
H
1p(3i1
(HilZlplopy
a-rc lam+
Z
OOZD ••-�ooyul
Ha m
pm�o 3aH
1ZNNGZl
Z
(i
TmH1Tn
(ZO.rt1?UraimpOomm
(n pOr0
j m pm Z3 m J°
c
m
Dim'
.<=m
3
m
I..,oHamm(n3
Zauzi�aia�
z
m
mwm
i
ZZO(Hr-�j�
m 7op
a
09�-imm�0
N a
H
.-
1 m v Z
m n H H
map
y
'+�apzo'i
Z
Fn -1=
00
m'0
Z
m
o
GHOiZZm=
Z1
p
p(�m(npm
OO
m
-I �Gv3pOp
Nrt1
Z
�uZiZ�oC"m�M
�mi0
Dm
an
cHi'vp�m(A
CI m
r
Z O n m v
pZ
Z
�Zv,(rrlapm
(n(,
O
Oimvvm-
i G .2 Z
m 0
(=ry p O r
Mc
=
z
A=Iv'-11'i D
vm
Npoym ua
Z ~
C
1�
mZ
(A
m
o
T m
n-qam (Zn
;IM-1
n
OH
m
m7°=D
)v A
1
z"(*I
O m m
a
T N
A
H
1-
/
O
3
N
t
O
O
O
0
I
m
m
Q
I
Q
3
0
75
Q
m
A
w
m
F
3
!
0
T3
19
0
I
D
Q
5
0
Z
0
1
0
O1
O_
F
H
I
O
3;
o
n
s
o,
o
I(^
Pn
0
P
m
m,
F
w
n
Uf
X
�.
D
P
a
'PP
m
)
Cs
o
3,
a
m
0-=
n
p
e
0
_
�
c
(o
P
I
a
D
T
m
n
O
M
V
V
UO
00
O
V
N
W
m
N
w
G
m
N
lT
V
(]I
N
O
w
v
a
A
m
a
ID
m
_.
°
-
1
0
K
a
0
0
�,
P
p
�a
0.
n0
A
m
I
n
0
O
oN
O
R
m
0
0ED
0
N
pO
3
3
,
m
U
�
�
O
Z
(P
N
0
m
ttD.
p
Kx
Qp
P
-7 =y
m T
,�V\
zv�7
4 p
3
o
n
rn
:jRR,
i I
--
U'
1�
n
^y
p
m
o
Z
�
Z
3
a
0
--�
n
it)
3
11
N
1�y
I :
A^)
^
N. In-
a �
rn
D
Olt
I
p
Q
3
O�
1 �
O
n
0
r H.
r
n
N
N.
0
o
c
0
m
�!
� fd.
n.
n �.
r+ Q
I••:
-----7---- \ n �, ( - ��- / � s--J)l � \/, \�, , 1� N � // �
/ \ - �-71�- � -j ,!� "--. ,/ -� �i- ,\ I �,, �- m / � ) � J) (-/ ��
/ r
I L-- o ° o Q 1
— - Florence Rd.- T - - \ (cp, ) v s \ - l J� �- { / v
>/- /</xv\ ---� ,,, � . �! �- 5� --- (- - ��/ f) (� I z 7 /�' / "I-, ,� /, ,� �
/ ' `� �
I / �\ *� J
\ / �, v � \ �, v ; /f�)J �J )) �) \\ 11 °' v
and
/ ) — n
G d � 1 ,41
\v '\ �� �v of ��- e '�, I I;f (� �// () % \/ (1
1
0
a �\ _/ ` ✓ \
a ( \
I J 9 w I \ B J
\ - ��h / \—/ ( 1 v � �� J _ � C
v v v 0.
\ _ � U/ f WO � z'� r I � \� -�
'� %e� / g /
/ ro G /
o C7 ro_ \
I f� /
- -/ , ) / � �,�� ,,\ , " --� -_ - � �3 1 � ;;, r 0 \V,
T
o �� w
3
� - � - / / I \ , /P 0 , I I _ - �j 5 0.
V \
�'' \� ,//� r/� ° ( � �l� I
�� _ _� -, - - -- -- - _ /
/ / / / , rJ= _�rosa I \
�7L i
// (/
7,.
/ � // / / e -rl
r -✓*
/ v / - - � � �, / / / 1 / l -i � �� \ ( \ q O �"�3
\ - . \ � / / / \ \ 1 \ l ^ � n CD \ / 1 � /"
/ m I �
O ,
/ CD 7 a161, � \
v / / _
1 \
/ \ , / /\ \ ^ �. CD G /
g ��
4 v to - `� L
->\ \ \ � --_
, Vle - - � � al \
\/ \ \ \ \ \\ I I / \- - = \ I 1 /
\,
I �� /
I I \ \ / / ,[--� - l/ Gym /�
— - , ,�� I \ l< / I - - - CD \ 51
(n
I \ \ \ I / ---__ - ----------- L -- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - --L--- --
\ �— _ _
\ - / CA
\ \\ \ / / I 11 I \
\ L � .O \
- go L-j ` \ CD a Cn �r
\ / ,,,�
\ 3 \ / / / \ 1 ,..t
�nr mm�� \ , I I 4 r` -�
-- V � \ \
N
--a m
{II
,
_ *
In m m
�
�
�
(�
�
s
D
,
m
cn
Z
A �
m
r�
D
m
Z
I
a,
O
Imo-
Z
m
C)
O
ZU
-9
�
m .
O
x
-i
*
*
m1
`1
O
-4
D
r
z I
17
m
m
-0
-0
Q w
*
O
m
A
j
0
-U
�]��Cl))
lu
A
�
-1
0
D
m
D
OD
O
x I
ora+D
r
-O
x
N
Z
CO O
<
D
m f
Z
T.
Z Z
=
0'
m
C
Z
n Q
Q
O
-<
OC
t�
7J
c.0
s
Z
O D
"
.
I
m
I
'
m
OC
o
>-
�
I I
3
Q
I1
I
Q
II
I
7
w
Z, "
9
6 mio
3 S,a
b
Fyd
y TM
, w_ P
N0
m 3
N
p
W. Z
f l 1 =
r 0
r r 3 Z
� -
=; F. N
9-�-
?, to _
to i
to , *.
3 3
1-
S ('0n
a N
A
A a 7
FA
i.O y AI
n O
R
S y N Q
C
Il 10
O b
.�'
A_ �
3
0 0c
y .a: w a
m U,
w.-u1
O U
wrn� 3.
O 3.
7 \ N
Io
- ± � F
R
QIO P S
QP O_ry
010
3-'
-2 S O
N
N N
N N
p N OO
O
O O
O O P
-o
iart1qs
rgiel
3
m m
o.
0
? nE
,, Us
o
a O n
m
v
p
tnLyr3.1
0`-90
R
0 N
�LIIIIy`^[
I
I0
�N
I
b
a �V�II
A
?
O
A (� .
O
O T
O o
O P
91
g O
3
3
O
a
'
a
3
µ
c -
3
3
3
P
M I
Y
y
y
Z
Cl
n N
N
w
' o
S
P
n O
O
_
:
P .,
w �. G
n
p y
'
v
a
n 3
c
PIN
r. o
Ob
T
,,O
(/1-
.,0R
n
v
oP
o-
� e
i �'
'
o
p
_
'o
nN �
o n+
-.
? - . F
N
r�p w
E
O
m
P
n-
U
d M
G j
Q N
0,
D
. N
_Y
F
N
3 N= O
w d
a
P
m
i
N P
O
O
d P-
d P
p3
S
?
N
O
j F
F O
V N
C
O
8
p
Rz
0
a,p
V S
G
p
Z
-
3<
Q9
P
9 O
O
nn
N
Z
O
Q
4
a
3 a
I
o
<.
A T
T
m
9
v
y,
m 10
2
cn
O M.
v+o
N
-
0
m
(n
v
P
1-�
rM
'- O'N
SP
Q
P
d
8 w
J N
P d
O
j
}
o =
O-C-
-3
AO
n
M
r
,
,,
a N
-' � µ;
P N
9
3
'<
a
o
=c N
- --m
i
p
3
O 'a
b s
, O_ O
N° o
O_
°n
£
P
r.-
a3 -T
9
r
O
o
O
P
N j."
1
b
y
3
X
O
yC
P G
N l
S R P
S
0
p
N
P
n
_1
n
v o
E '0 3
O
N
.
0
uPi
S
O
9
d
O .
S O
O , M
'o
-
IT
ne
n o
N
H 3
S
N
0
p
0 P
O
d
1
A
�
O P
O
i
y
b
,
o o c
'
o
K)
v
w
0
�z
�����
---
>r.WE
R ..
I
3,a
S
"w
�I '
b
Sni,-
-1 I �
3 n t.6
ICI
iirA€
II
I
I
I
I�I
'ya
�n
t.�3
.
o
. -
1
I�I
I .
, 4I .0
1 1 'S
+
d n
Mg
§
I I
9. _.
II -II
I I
m
m
��ir
E
la
11
I
1;
�
3
1
I
11 0
0 A
I I
1
O
111 1
to
e o
I
I
N
m
3
Ii11131 111
.}
- O
Z
F
1
Nx
U
0
1 111
ti
S
�y
1 -
I
0
1.

KC
Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENVa WMENTALCUN"
December 15, 2017
Mr. John J. Tiberi
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
2710 Wycliff Raid
Raleigh, NC 27607
-RE: -Permit No. 01-08
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Tiberi:
ROY COOPER
Govern-
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Nerremry
TRACY DAVIS
oa nor
Your recent request to have the above referenced mining permit modified has been
approved. The modification is to increase the affected acreage at this site to 374.7 acres as
indicated on the Mine Plan last revised October 19, 2017. The modification includes
expansion of the previous) approved berm along the property south of the plant and adjacent
to Carter Lane. The modification also includes expansion of Erosion Control Basin #1 to
accommodate the additional drainage area. A copy of the modified permit is enclosed.
Please be advised that the North Carolina Mining Act of 1971 was amended on October
4, 2017 by Session Law 2017-209 which stales that all existing mining permits and any newly
mining permits are to be issued for the life of site or for the duration of the lease term. Thus,
there is no expiration date for this mining permit. The "life of site" means the period from the
initial receipt of a permit for the operation until the mining operation terminates and the
required reclamation is completed. The mine name and permit number on the permit
document, and all existing operating and reclamation conditions contained therein, shall
remain in full force and effect. Furthermore, all provisions of GS §74-51 and GS §74-52 still
apply to all new, transferred and modified mining permits.
In addition to the life of site or lease mining permit provision, Session Law 2017-209 .
also enacted a new annual mining permit operating fee of $400 per mining permit number. By'
statute, the initial payment of this annual $400 fee must be submitted to this office by
December 31, 2017. Beginning in 2018, the $400 annual operating fee must be submitted by
July 1 of each year along with the required Annual Reclamation Report as required by GS
§74-55. Failure to submit the fee by the required deadline will result in a $50/month late fee
and could result in the denial of future permit actions and/or.revocation of your mining permit.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily upon the initial application.
Modifications were made as indicated by the modification request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The mine name and permit number shall remain the
same as before the modification. I would like to draw your particular attention to the following
conditions where minor additions or changes were made: Operating Condition Nos.3C, 4F,
10B, 13 and14.
5tate9rNatt, Caro4na L9rironmeixal Q9Nh I S+re* , Mineral arJ LenA Reswrts
512 N, Sallsbury Rivet 11612 Mail Service CentnI Role gh N0I11,Cardlna216991612
91970792GG

Mr. Tiber!
Page Two
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local
zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations
lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 600.2 acres and the amount of
land you are approved to disturb is 374.7 acres.
Please review the modified permit and contact Judy Wehner, Assistant Mining
Specialist, at [phone] should you have any questions concerning this matter.
-nca
illia E Vinson, Jr., Pi
Interim Director
WEV/jw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Mr. William Gerringer-Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERALS AND LAND
RESOURCES
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
taws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County - Permit No. 01-08
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environmental Quality hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in
conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this
permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security_
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
August 8 1988: This permit has been modified to include the construction of access/haul
roads to the monitoring wells and the Magazine and the construction of Berm B as indicated
on Sheets 1 and 3 dated June 30, 1988 and Sheets 2 and 4 dated July 29, 1988 of the revised
map.
September 30, 1988_ This permit has been modified to include the construction of a second
entrance to Highway 49 and a new berm (Berm F) as indicated on the revised Erosion Control
Plan dated September 12, 1988.

Page 3
March 6, 1990_ This permit has been modified to include the development of the Related Use
Area, the extension of Berm D along the southern property line, and the designation of the
new haul road immediately west of the quarry area denoted in the modification request and
revised Erosion Control Plan dated January 24 and January 15, 1990, respectively.
June 21 1991: This permit has been modified to include site grading and erosion control
measures relating to the Berm F extension and the Stripping Extension 1991 as specified by
the revised Erosion Control Plan dated April 16, 1991.
November 25, 1992: This permit has been modified to allow the installation of an additional
creek crossing near the existing quarry area and the associated sediment and erosion control
measures as indicated on the Erosion Control Plan dated September 30, 1992, the Storm
Drainage Improvements Plan dated June 4, 1992, and the Erosion Control Details dated June
4, 1992.
April 13, 1993: This permit has been modified to allow the substitution of three 96 inch
aluminized steel type 2 pipes in lieu of the previously approved two 120 inch concrete lined
corrugated metal pipes in Boyd's Creek as indicated on the Alternate Design Plan revised
February 12, 1993.
November 22, 1996: This permit has been modified to allow the expansion of Berm F and
associated sedimentation and erosion control measures as indicated on the Mine Map dated
July 27, 1996.
January 27, 1998: This permit has been modified to increase the affected area by 15.3 acres
of overburden removal area and associated erosion and sedimentation control measures, as
indicated on the mine map last revised September 2, 1997.
Februarr27, 1998, This permit has been modified to allow the pit expansion, the creek
relocation, and additional overburden storage, along with each activity's associated erosion
and sedimentation control measures, as indicated on the mine map last revised December 8,
1997. The creek relocation and its associated erosion and sedimentation has been approved
with certain stipulations.
June 4, 1998: This permit has been modified to allow on site generated waste material to be
placed in Berm F as indicated on the Mine Map received on April 16, 1998,
May 1, 2002: This permit has been modified to add 6.8 acres to the affected acreage at this
site to allow the construction of an asphalt plant, a slight revision to the approved pit limits, the
relocation of a monitoring well, and the installation and maintenance of the associated
sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on the 2002 Permit Modification Mine
Map last revised April 24, 2002 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant dated March 7, 2002. This modification also includes an adjustment to the
affected acreage at this site in light of more accurate mapping techniques.
July 8, 2002: This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation, has been transferred in its
entirety to Martin Marietta Aggregates.

Page 4
December 22, 2004: This permit has been modified to incorporate the Haw River Quarry
(Mining Permit No. 01-09) into the East Alamance Quarry permit, and to add an additional
85.5 acres to the permit boundary, as indicated on the Mine Map last revised November 12,
2004, The modification is to increase the permitted acreage to 610.61 acres and the affected
acreage at this site to 380.67 acres. The modification includes the addition of 310.61
permitted acres and the addition of 188.37 affected acres.
Auoust 22, 2008: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at this site
to 411.40 acres as indicated on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008. This modification
includes the addition of overburden disposal area and processing area/hauls roads and the
installation and maintenance of all associated erosion and sedimentation control measures. In
addition, the modification includes the necessary approval from the Division of Water Quality
relating to the stream relocation and stream channel impacts.
July 15, 2013: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from
Martin Marietta Aggregates to Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
May 2. 2017, This permit has been modified to decrease the permitted acreage to 600.2
acres and the affected acreage at this site to 372.7 acres as indicated on the Mine Plan
received on March 29, 2017. The modification includes overall updating of the site conditions
on the mine map, construction of a new tenant area (asphalt plant), removal of a portion of
berm construction along the southwestern permitted area, redesign of Culverts A and B and
allows the use of rip rap baffles with stipulations. The modification also includes the
installation and maintenance of all associated erosion and sediment control measures.
December 1, 2017, This permit has been modified to be issued for the life of site or for the
duration of the lease term.
December 15, 2017: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at this
site to 374.7 acres as indicated on the Mine Plan last revised October 19, 2017. The
modification includes expansion of the previously approved berm along the property south of
the plant and adjacent to Carter Lane. The modification also includes expansion of Erasion
Control Basin #1 to accommodate the additional drainage area.
This permit is valid for the life of the site or life of lease, if applicable, as defined by Session
Law 2017-209 and has no expiration date. However, all provisions of GS §74-51 and GS §74-
52 still apply to all new, transferred and modified mining permits. "
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, at, seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:

Page 5
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
Wastewater and Quarry Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission,
B. Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary storm water permits or
other approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of
Air Quality.
B. All permanent access roads (plant entrances) pavement shall be maintained
from the junctions with Sandy Cross Road (SR 1752) and NC Highway 49 for the
distances indicated in the last revised mine maps. During processing operation,
water trucks or other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent
dust from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that waterway or
wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse or wetland.
C. All buffer zones shown on the Mine Plan last revised October 19, 2017 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and approved earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.

Page 6
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. Energy dissipaters shall be provided at all pipe outlets. All energy dissipators
installed after December 22, 2004, shall be constructed, at a minimum, of Class
B stone at a 22-inch thickness, 12 feet long, and as per the detail submitted in
the modification application received on August 6, 2004.
C. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine
Map last revised November 12, 2004.
D. All mining activities, including those associated with the additional overburden
disposal area, processing area/haul road and stream relocation of the unnamed
tributary to Boyd's Creek, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine Map last
revised July 2, 2008 and the supplemental information received on March 20,
2008 and July 7, 2008, with the exception that temporary sediment control
measures be utilized just below the downstream end of proposed culverts No.
105 and No. 106 during the installation of the culverts; that silt bags or a stilling
basin be utilized for any discharge of water that may have to be pumped from
the actual construction area of the Boyd's Creek Road Crossing; and if
necessary, an impervious dike be utilized on the upstream side of the Boyd's
Creek culvert installation area to impound water for the pumping operation.
E. Mining activities associated with the overall updating of the site conditions on the
mine map, construction of a new tenant area (asphalt plant), removal of a portion
of berm construction along the southwestern permitted area, redesign of Culverts
A and B and allows the use of rip rap baffles with the stipulation that the baffles
shall be replaced every six months and basins shall be enlarged to compensate
for the rip rap baffle volume including the installation and maintenance of all
associated erosion and sediment control measures, shall occur as indicate on
the Mine Plan received on March 29, 2017 and supplemental information
received October 14, 2016, December 7, 2016, January 24, 2017 and March 29,
2917.
F. Mining activities associated with the expansion of the previously approved berm
along the property south of the plant and adjacent to Carter Lane, including the
installation and maintenance'of the revised erosion and sediment control
measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine Plan last revised October
19, 2017 and the supplemental information received October 27, 2017,

Page 7
G. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not
limited to, expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden or waste disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008, shall
be monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of consolidated
material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the determination of pre-existing
(static) groundwater levels.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock and
grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into unweathered rock, whichever is
deeper. The wells shall be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits or approvals to construct these wells shall be
obtained from the Division of Water Quality.
C. The observation wells shall be monitored quarterly at the same day and
approximate time of day. The static water levels shall be measured with an
accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum point and
a record of the water levels maintained. The quarterly precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these records
shall be provided to the Department on or about the end of each quarter. Static
water level monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Sloaes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which
can be retained. by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels,
the erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient
to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the quarry opening shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized within 60
days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum ten (10) foot wide horizontal safety
bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of any overburden
slope.

Page 8
Surface Drainace
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
8. Blasting
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance
no farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or
leased by the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air
overpressure, and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as
provided under Operating Condition Nos. 8B and 8D of this permit). The following
blasting conditions shall be observed by the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons
and adjacent property from surface blasting:
A. Ground Vibration With Monitoring:
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling
house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.
10.0
Slapt Kbratron Frequenry, Hz
Figure 1 Alternative blasting level criteria
(Source modified from figure B-r. Bureau Of Mines Ri 9507)

Page 9
B. Ground Vibration Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
W = (DIDS)2 Ds = D
W112
V = 160(DS)-'.6
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
DS = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per
second, for the purposes of this Section.
C. Air blast With Monitoring:
Air blast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129
decibels linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted
area such as a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or
institutional building, unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the
seismograph microphone as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measuring System, in Hz _ _ in dBL
0.1 Hz or lower -flat response 134 peak
2.0 Hz or lower -flat response 133 peak
6.0 Hz or lower -flat response 129 peak
D. Air blast Without Monitgd :
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
U = 82 (D/W0.33)-1.2
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):

Page 10
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x10-9)
Confined Air blast/Overpressure (dBQ
for quarry situation:
A=P-35
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet)._
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Air blast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).
The air blast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section-
E. Record Keeping:
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to
closest offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of
the blast. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies
shall be provided to the Department upon request.
Excessive Ground Vibration/Air blast Reoortina:
If ground vibration or Air blast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting
may occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization
to blast at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the
high ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal
approval. Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
G. Flvrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and
repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.

Page 11
H. Flyrock Reporting:
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on
the mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
1. A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the investigation shall be provided to the Department
within 10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions
that will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with
the approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine
site.
I. Studies:
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a
level allowed by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
J. Notice:
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24-hour advance
notice to the Winston Salem Regional Regional Office prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or 48-inch fencing with
two strands of barbed wire (total 60 inches overall height) shall be maintained at all
times along the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. In
addition, a minimum 10 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the
junction between the top of rock and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening
methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.

Page 12
B. Vegetated earthen berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Plan last revised October 19, 2017. In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or
Virginia pines or other acceptable evergreen species shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
C. The Previously Approved Overburden Disposal Area and Future Berth areas
shall be constructed and stabilized as indicated on the Mine Map last revised
November 12, 2004.
11. Plan Modification
A. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any
approved revisions to it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
B. A modification request shall be submitted to and approved by the Department
rip or to commencement of any mining relatedactivitieson the 33.82-acre tract as
depicted on the Mine Map last revised November 12, 2004. As part of said
request, the permittee shall provide proper notification to all adjoining
landowners and the chief administrative officer(s) of the local government(s) of
its intentions to affect any areas in said tract.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources, Department of Environmental quality. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources considers the following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to
those specifically listed under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts

Page 13
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5. steel reinforced air hoses
6. drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Prior to commencement of such
disposal-
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established
E. Used, clean concrete shall only be allowed on permitted quarry sites that have
obtained a valid air permit and are allowed to operate crushing operations for the
purposes of recycling and reuse provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Appropriate quality control measures shall be taken when the used
concrete arrives onsite to ensure that all such concrete processed onsite
is clean, inert material.
2. Used, clean concrete shall be temporarily stockpiled and processed within
existing approved affected areas draining to existing approved erosion
and sedimentation control measures.
3. No used, clean concrete material shall be permanently disposed of onsite.
4. Any foreign material that may be found within the used concrete must be
separated from the concrete and properly recycled or disposed off -site.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report and Annual Operating Fee of $400.00 shall be
submitted to the Department by July 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and
approved for release by the Department.
14. Bonding
The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$1,000,000.00 blanket bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.

Page 14
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 15
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides: ,.
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an-arigie as to minimize the possibility of slides -and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any high wall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:

Page 16
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation. -
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12A.
through 12D.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Reveaetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
on the Details Sheet last revised July 2, 2008 and approved by Mr. Nuwan Wijesuriya of
Martin Marietta Materials on March 19, 2008.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.

Page 17
This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation March 4, 1988, modified August 8, 1988,
September 30, 1988, March 6, 1990, June 21, 1991, November 25, 1992, April 13,
1993, November 22, 1996, and January 27, 1998, modified and renewed February 27,
1998, modified June 4, 1998 and May 1, 2002, transferred in its entirety to Martin
Marietta Aggregates July 8, 2002 modified December 22, 2004 renewed and modified
August 22, 2008 and modified July 15, 2013, May 2, 2017 and December 1, 2017, is
hereby modified this 15th day of December, 2017 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
By: -
William E. Vinson, Jr., Interim hector
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environmental Quality

Kro
Energy, Mineral6
tandResaurces
fNWRONMENi1L OU41ry
November 27, 2017
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7015 9640 0007 9831 2647
Mr. Jay Nivens
-- ---Martin-MariettaMaterials-Inc. - —
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
RE: East Alamance Quarry
Mining Permit No. 01-08
Alsmance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Nivens:
ROY COOPER
cav ar
MICHAEL S. REGAN
sa Wq
TRACY DAVIS
drx
The review has been completed on the modification request you submitted for the
referenced mine site. In order for this office to complete its review of the referenced project in
accordance with GS 74-50 and 51 of the Mining Act of 1971, please provide the following:
Pursuant to GS §74-54, the cap on reclamation bonds has been raised from $500,000
to $1 million. Any adjustments needed in existing bonds will be initiated by this office or
addressed during your next requested permit action unless you contact this office with a
written request to have your bond reevaluated. The new blanket bond or balance
($500,000.00) will be required prior to approval of this modification.
For your convenience, I have enclosed a bond form, an assignment of a savings
account form and irrevocable standby letter of credit form for your use in securing the required
bond. The name on the security must be the same as the name appearing on the application
for a mining permit, i.e., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Ih addition toone of these
alternatives, you may, upon request, substitute a cash deposit.
Please be advised that the modification request cannot be completed until the new bond
amount has been received.
As required by G.S. 74-51 (h), you are hereby advised that you have 60 days from the
date of your receipt of this letter to submit the reclamation bond. If you are unable to meet this
deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information, in writing, to the
Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an extension of ��
time be granted.
S,aanfN nhQaroe„e I EnnM, Mineral and Land P aurcea
517N.&4ka Sheer I= Mall Service Cemer I Ulgh NorthC lnO27699-1612
919 707 9200
\V XJ

CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Nivens
Page Two
In order to complete the processing of your modification request, please forward the
bond to my attention at the following address:
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
1612.Mall-Service-Center - - - -- - - --.-- --
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
cerely, T
Judith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Enclosures: Bond Forms
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE

Wenner, Judy
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:03 AM
To: Wehner, Judy; Vinson, Toby
Subject: DWR and DWQ Comments for East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Attachments: DOC112017-11202017105708.pdf
Judy and Toby,
Please and attached the DWR and DAQ comments for 01-08.
Thanks,
Matt
**am £ ¢wx. A.S.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776.9800 office
336.776-9654 mobileidirect
Matt.gantt®ncdenr.gov
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
Forthe
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ProjecUNumber: Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. - East Alamance Quarry County: Alamance
Please return comments back to: Matt Gantt, P.E.. WSRO
Comments due by: November 17, 2017
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of
. Comments: This facility that is currently ooaFatina ul
YES
Air permit required _
Air permit existing X (Permit # 04330R18)
Other Comments: Martin. Marietta_Materiats_.Inc. -
Reviewed by: �� 9�•
Print Name: Davis Murphy
Rev Dec 2006
NO
X
Data: November 15, 2017
Can ml Or R Vle r

WarerResources
ENVIRONMENT AL OVLLITY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
November 15, 2017
Ms. Judy Wehner
Land Quality Section
Michael Baueko
Ground Water Management Branch
Division of Water Resources
• ROY COOPER
Govern .
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secremry
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
pp SI 'irti. @'
Nov 15 2017
LAND QUALITY
MINING r1flocrLIAM
Comments on the Mining Permit Modification Request for:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Please find attached a copy of the mining permit Modification request for the above referenced project.
The East Alamance Quarry, located in Alamance County, does not appear to have an unduly adverse
effect on ground water supplies and has previously registered their withdrawals, with the Division of
Water Resources, as facility ID N0219-0007.
Facilities are required to register their water withdrawals in accordance with the North Carolina General
Statute G.S. 143-215.22H. This statute requires any non-agricultural water user who withdraws 100,000
gallons or more in any one day of ground water or surface water to register and update withdrawals. This
statue also requires transfers of 100,000 gallons or more in any one day of surface water from one river
basin to another river basin to register and update their water transfers. Water withdrawal registrants must
complete the annual water use reporting form by April I for the previous year. The registration form may
be obtained From the following link:
htip://www.newater.orWPermits_and_Registration/ Water_ Withdrawal_and_Transrer_Regislmtion.
If you have further questions regarding the water withdrawal registration please contact John Barr with the
Division of Water Resources at [phone] or email him [e-mail].
Sda orNOM Clmline RIR'wmnmul QuInY Weer Remucn
1611 Mu1 w9rt[Cmla a.kp,NmO Cma1M3]MA1611
919 r0)9EW

Kro
Energy.Aflneral8:
Land Resources
E"A*NMENTAL CUALIW
MEMORANDUM
October 30, 2017
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources ,,(
FROM: Brenda M. Harris C/"Q1'�! A
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for MMA Inc.
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
ROY COOPER
aowrwr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
7Kre9ry
TRACY DAVIS
7uEerar
aos
C` 5N To"
0
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatering Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by November
179 2017 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wenner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
/bmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
Slam ofNorthC mhna I EmlronmentaiQuality I Energy, Iwneral and l.mdltesq es
51214.SeIIEWrySlreet 16a Ma115arv1ee Center I U1d9le Nanh Cwc11ra27699-Ib12
9197079200

Wehner, Judy
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Monday, November 06, 20171:22 PM
To: Wehner, Judy
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Hi Judy,
We have reviewed the mining modification plan for the proposed berm construction at East Alamance Quarry in
Alamance County. We have found the modification request to be satisfactory. The expansion of basin #1 also took into
account the volume reduction for the installation of the stone baffle within the basin. Approval of this modification is
recommended. Copies of the request have also been forwarded to both DWR and DAQ so that they may comment.
Please let me know If you have any further questions.
Thanks,
Matt
sh" 8. ¢ka, P £.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Lard Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9654 mobileldireot
Mad.ganu@ncdenr,gov
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
. �i Nothing Compares..-.._
Email correspondence to and Imm this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Wehner, Judy
From:
Harris, Brenda M
Sent:
Friday, November 03, 2017 9:29 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy; Vinson, Toby
Subject:
FW: East Alamance Quarry Permit 01-08_Alamance NCWRC Comments
Attachments:
MP 01-08 Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry_Modification_NCWRC Comments.pdf
From: Munzer, Olivia
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 7:33 AM
To: Harris, Brenda M <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; John Ellis <[e-mail]>
Subject: East Alamance Quarry Permit 01-08_Alamance _NCW RC Comments
Brenda,
Please see the attached comments regarding the East Alamance Quarry. Feel free to contact me with questions. Thank
you.
Olivia
Olivia Muner
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Certified Wildlife Biologist`
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Sykes Depot, 2430 Turner Rd.
Mebane, NC 27302
Office: 336.290,OOS6 // Cell: 336.269.0074
of ivia.munzerOncwildllfe.or¢
www.ncwildlife.ora
a 91 IM M
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to thiN Parties

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO. Brenda M. Harris, Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
FROM: Olivia Marini, Western Piedmont Coordinator ���
Habitat Conservation Division
DATE: 3 November 2017
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for Martin Marietta Materials Inc., East Alamance Quarry —
Permit No. 01.08, Alamance County, North Carolina.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NC WRC) have reviewed the subject
permit application. Our comments arc provided in accordance with provisions of the Mining Act of 1971
(as amended, 1982) (G.S. 74-46 through 74-69 15 NCAC 5).
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. is requesting a modification for mining granite with the 600.2 acre
permitted area at the East Alamance Quarry located at 2261 Martin Marietta Drive, Burlington, Alamance
County, North Carolina (NC). The applicant is requesting a permit modification to expand the previously
approved berm along the property line south of the plant and adjacent to Carter Lane, and to expand
erosion control basin 41 to accommodate the additional drainage area.
The applicant indicates all water discharges (stormwater runoff and groundwater seepage) will be tested
for pH, turbidity, total suspended solids and settleable solids to ensure water quality standards are met.
Also, existing streams within the permit boundary will have a 50-foot undisturbed buffer. The
reclamation plan includes leaving the pit and supply lake as a permanent water impoundment, and grading
and re -vegetating according to the seeding schedule provided.
Boyds Creek and unnamed tributaries to Boyds Creek in the Cape Fear River basin flow through the site.
Boyds Creek is classified as a Nutrient Sensitive Water and a Class C stream by the NC Department of
Water Resources (NCDWR). The NCWRC has no known, current records of state or federally -listed rare,
threatened, or endangered species within or adjacent to the site.
Should the permit modification be approved, we offer the following recommendations to mini min
impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife species.
Meiling Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699.1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

•
Page 2
3 November 2017
East Alamance Quarry
Permit No. 01-08
1. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams (i.e.,
Boyds Creek), and a minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands.
Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the
site.
2. Water discharges from the site should be proportional to the size of the receiving stream so the
hydrology of the stream is not altered, and all discharges should comply with NPDES permit
requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be maintained at or below the
permit requirement. High water discharge rates and turbidity can negatively impact aquatic
resources within and downstream of the site. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have
numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat,
suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species.
3. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is
strongly recommended. Natural fiber matting is recommended over matting made of or
containing plastic that can impinge and entrap small animals. Silt fencing that has been
reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial
wildlife species.
4. Non-native plants should be removed from the seeding schedule. Native plants are preferred and
recommended for revegetation and reclamation activities. Shrub lespedeza and sericea lespedeza
are invasive and/or non-native and should be avoided. NCWRC recommends an alternative mix
of red clover, creeping red fescue, and a grain, such as oats, wheat, or rye.
5. We recommend reclaiming the relatively shallow sediment basins as wetlands, where practicable.
Also consider working with NCWRC to create potential hibernacula for bats by creating or
modifying tunnels, such as surge tunnels.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit modification. Further information on native
plants or reclamation, and free technical guidance from the NCWRC, please contact me at (336) 290-
0056 or olivia.munzerAncwildlife.org.
ec: Jay Nivens, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
John Ellis, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Applicant's Name: rrI m{�rl�l t1My ProjectName: Y - A,, e✓
Applie/Permit No: OI`49 Cottmq: Date Rere"
iced: lUT
Reoieaxr: River Basin Name: �� 11 ��
❑ Nano ❑ Reatwd lel Modification (inside ptrmit bwndanes)
❑ Modification (wtside permit 6ouerdmies) ❑ Transfer ❑ 4arc
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed s rFM Received s (0U0
to:
Chrsllik"to weeaq
Engineer)
Date: Routed /� �U ! Redd (sae � 1 7
Division of Water Resources
Routed Ret d
NC WilAife Resources Connni siw Date: Routed Redd
❑ US Fish& WsiMfe Service Date: Routed Reed
(Ody um goaauom ad w8praden rryueas dirt add lad a dw prwit)
Plate rank first 3 PaItes of theapplicahon and any laation maps to:
❑ Division of Paris d7ljeneation Dote: Routed Rer'd
❑ NC Crologicd Surveq Section Date Routed Reed
❑ Division of Marne Fisheries Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ Division c f Sailit Water Cautrnation (plus LEA) Date: Routed Rn'd
(Only new applksa mad madifvmma reguenr thin add tad m the pert)
❑ Division of Archives dr Hiaaq Date: Routed Redd
(Odymm appih'mw)
❑ Other. Does. Routed Redd .
lwastim Review
eepirs m the Retiwul
�* Suspense Date for Comments: (m toter than 25 dags fromWeipt)
0 Please note the fottmoing:

PC.
Energy, Mineral&
Land Resources
EM/190MMEWAL ovum
October 30, 2017
MEMORANDUM
_ -- TO: Ms. Olivia Munzer-
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources /Cpmmm�ionssion�
FROM: Brenda M. Harris / b o'�h�" v
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for MMA Inc.
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
ROY COOPER
m. nmr
MICHAEL S. RECAN ..
s.Y.emry
TRACY DAVIS
0b
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having unduly
adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74-51 (2)). Please respond by November 17,
2017 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that they are
sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your
staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting
this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS
TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wenner at (919)
707-9220 if you have any questions.
/bmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
4
9NeafN MhI mMa I nm mem Qualtty I Energy, yA1eN antl Wndaesaurtes
Sa N. UN" 9rtee l IN2 Ma119arvke Ce w I M k%hN Cma aMQ9 Wa
919MT9200

ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
smTem.y
Energy, Mineral i TRACY DAVITS
LandResaarces
L MONN6NTALOUALI" October 30, 2017
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group -
Division
Division of Water Ree�sso�ou`rcvess �
FROM: Brenda M. Harris Y lJ • `r-' - v
Mining Program Secretary -
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for MMA Inc.
East Alamanoe Quarry
Alamance County
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatering Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by November
17, 2017 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
lbmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
StateorNorthC mrm I Emrcnme=l Qualdy I Energy, MLrcrzl and l Mswmes
512N.SdNhury Serctt 16a Meg Se Cmm I Raleigh Nm Cxdt 2%9 3612
%9i079200

Transmittal Letter
Martin Marietta
Martin 8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Marietta ;charlotte, NC 28217
(P) 704-409-1475 (F) 704-527-9283
q: -
NCDEQ,- Energy Mining Land Resources
Attention:
Judy Wehner
y
East Alamance Mine Permit
512 N Salisbury Street - 5th Floor-
Raleigh, NC 27604-1170
Re:
Modification
l®'�IOt
'
I0I�,E1
' '���-
Goples
Descri o
r r,r.
-
,R
6
Cover letter, Application, Revised Mine Plan,IC Design Calculations, USG S 8
Roadway Map
$1,000.00 Modification Fee Check #1819551
i
i
For Approval
Approved as Submitti
Resubmit copies for approval
For Your Use
Approved as Noted I
As Requested
Returned for t orrectis
Please let me know if you have any questions or need al further information.
ocl 27 2617
GU.•.
•„n
i
1 10/26/17
Signre

-- •
L
M W un
Marietta VENDOR NO.
M eOX=13 MLEION, NDR1N CAROUNA 23G2 13 158632
DATE:
CHECK NO.
1815558
10125/17
DATE
INVOICE'CREDIT
OROSSANIT.
ADJ.DESC
DISCOUNT
NETAMOUNT
l UI9117
15S53244327101917
1.000.00
EAST ALAMANCE MINE PER
1,000.00
THE AITACNNC CNeCKiE IN FAV
wN�Da AIRED -
Amre
TOTAL:
1,000.00
-
1,000.00
CHECK NO. 01 B19558
CHECK AMOUNT
. t•••••1,000.00...
Y
a NCDENR a
LAND QUALITY SECTION
1612 MAIL SERVICE CTR
RALEIGH NO 27699 1612 5xnw,} a
R
a,q V a2W

{ . : F
•
0
Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry Mine Modification Submittal
• Modification Cover Letter
• Mine Permit Application
• USGS Exhibit
• Roadway Exhibit
Engineering Calculations
• Erosion Control Basin Design Calculations
• Drainage Area Maps

Martin
Marietta
October 26, 2017
:..
Ms. Judy Wehner OCT 2 7 2017
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDEQ-Energy, Mineral and Land Resources L4i�J G►U.-Ai ; y
1612 Mail Service Center 'AWING f."ROG11Y. ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
RE: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08
Mine Permit Modification
Dear Ms. Wehner:
This is a letter requesting the Mine Permit modification for our East Alamance Quarry located at
2261 Martin Marietta Drive in Burlington, NC. The proposed modifications to the currently
approved plan are:
• Expansion of the previously approved berm along the property line south of the plant
and adjacent to Carter Lane.
• Expansion of Erosion Control Basin #1 to accommodate the additional drainage area.
1 have included the Mine Permit Application, Mine Permit Modification Fee, Updated Mine
Map, USGS Exhibit Map, Roadway Map, Drainage Area Maps and Erosion Control Design
Calculations.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or at [e-mail] should
you have any questions or need any additional information.
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
east alamance mine permit modification coverletter 10-19-17.docx

•
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine East Alamance Ouar v County Alamance OCT 2 7 2017
River Basin Cape Fear LP i. J OJAUT if
Latitude (decimal degrees to four places) 36.128515 ANING PRDGRXj
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places) -79 5027
2. Name of Applicant* Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 2710 Wycliff Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] Altercate No.
4. Mine Office Address 2261 Martin Marietta Drive Burlington. NC 27217 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Josh Turner
6. Email Address: iosh.tumer(amartinmarietta.com
1 certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature �-- Date 1d• 1/ , 17
Print Name Jon eri
Title Pres' nt Mid- t antic Division
• This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
•• The Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources must be notified of any changes in the permanent
address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grantor deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental inormation required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MININP PERMIT •
NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered regarding your mining operation
for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding, detailed
mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
1. Answer all of the following that apply:
❑ If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by
the permit (this is the acreage t-at ie "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
® if this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered y the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: 0 1 -08 Total permitted acreage: 600.2
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ® No ❑. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 2.0
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No ❑. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: . (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.:
disturbed, ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, a
"minor modification" fee of $100.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added).
If yes, indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total
acreage to he added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based
upon):__
❑ If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered y the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: Total permitted acreage:
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO BE
PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Granite
3. Miming method:
❑ Hydraulic Dredge
Dragline & Truck
Other (explain):
®Front-end Loader & Truck ❑ Shovel & Truck
Self -loading Scraper
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 500
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
Natural Ground
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 400
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes ® No ❑
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? Currently_ being mined by Martin Marietta
Materials

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (Life of the Mining Operation or Life of Lease from
Public Entity): Life of Mine
B. MAPS
1. Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six 6 copies of a 7.5-minute
quadrangle and a county highway map. These maps, In addition to six 6 copies of all mine maps and
reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-minute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
1612 Mail Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 51 Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
htti)://aortal.ncdenr.orp/web/Ir/aeolosical home
County highway maps may he obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation -- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Mailing Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
1587 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
(9I9) 212-6000
hU://www.ncdot.orp-/it/izis/
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. Thus, all mine and reclamation
maps must denote those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining
permit. All maps must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly
illustrate the following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
gg Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of I00 year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek,
stream, river, or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining
permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has
four lanes of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
b. Symbols used and corresponding names
?. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE
MAP SCALE
049 Acres
1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres
l inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres
1 inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)

APPLICATION FOR A MININIPPERMIT •
A tablelebart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
See Map
Processing Area/Stockpile Area
See Map
Wastepiles
See Map
Haul Roads
See Map
Mine Excavation
See Map
Other (Buffer Areas)
See Map
Total Disturbed Acreage
See Map
NOTE:
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORAI). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE
MAPS.

APPLICATION FOR A MiNINPPERMIT •
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL. RESOURCES
I . Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference
the sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
Overburden material and sap rock present above the hard rock will be removed. The rock is drilled and
blasted to produce a product that can be transported to the plant for processing. From there, the raw
material is crushed and screened to produce desired products. A construction sequence of land
disturbing activities is provided on the Mine Map, specifically as it relates to sediment and erosion
control. Maintenance and stabilization efforts will be conducted as noted and as required in the mining
act.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include speci is plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s), wasteplles, access/mine roads an process areas), and give a detailed sequence of
installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion
control measures on the mine maps) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details of each
measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any proposed
measures.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed in accordance with the Mine Map and
construction details. These measures will be installed prior to disturbing the area they are designed to
protect. The construction sequence indicates the steps that will be taken to maintain all of the sediment
and erosion control measures. Temporary diversions are provided to direct all surface runoff through
the sediment basins. Design calculations are provided on the Mine Map to support the dimensions and
construction of the proposed sediment basins. The majority of runoff from the property will be
maintained internally, either from the pit or the existing sediment basins. Any proposed changes that
are not included on the Mine Map will be submitted to the Division of Land Resources for approval.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, reeyeling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes ® No ❑. If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
Process wash water from material washing is treated through a closed -loop system within the settling
cells. The system operates as a closed circuit with no discharge of process water off -site. The system is
further described in the General NPDES permit issued to the mining industry and specifically, NPDES
Permit #NCG020029 for this facility.
b. Will the operation involve dischar ing fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yes i No ❑. If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge and
locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine map(s).
Water discharged as a result of mine dewatering is comprised of storm water runoff and groundwater
seepage. This water will gravity flow to the pit sump for clarification prior to discharge. Water
collected in the pit will be used to replenish the closed -loop system or replenish the existing fresh
water pond on the property. Any accumulated water that is not needed, will be discharged through
the approved outfall location, specifically Outfall 001 shown on the Mine Map. Outfall 001 discharges
into Boyds Creek. Discharge water from the outfall will be tested for pH, Turbidity, Total Suspended
Solids, and Settleable Solids; in accordance with the requirements of General NPDES Permit
requirements to ensure that water quality standards are met.

.' .,�• �'
•• � �
r
'
i 1
'
� � .�
i �
}�
' �
� � '

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table? Yes ® No �.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal
rate in gallons per day: 0.40 MGD . Locate all existing wells on the mine
map(s) that lie within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any
conclusions or statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and
current water withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water
system or private wells.
The close proximity of the rock to the surface of the ground and the low level of permeability of the
rock in the quarry area indicate that the quarry development will have no detrimental impact on any
wells in the area.
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality pernut(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) from
the Stormwater Program. In addition, the applicant is required to register water use with the Division
of Water Resources, Ground Water Management Branch, if the operation withdraws more than 10,000
gallons per day and needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources, Ground Water
Management Branch, if the operation lies in a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000
gallons per day.
The process is described in the General NPDES permit issued to the mining industry and specifically,
NPDES Permit No. NCG020024 for this facility. This permit authorizes the discharge of storm water,
process water, and mine dewatering to the surface waters of North Carolina.
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
The NC Division of Air Quality has issued air Permit No.05132 for this facility.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Fugitive dust from the processing plant, stockpiles, etc. will be controlled through the use of a wet
suppression system within the operating plant. A large water truck will be used to control the dust on
the haul roads, pit area and within the stockpile area. A large portion of the annual production will
consist of washed stone, which generates little dust.
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-
of-way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions.
Note that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit
boundary or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a
wider buffer may be needed depending on site conditions. Show all buffer locations and widths
on the mine map(s).
The approved unexcavated buffers as shown on the Mine Plan along the mining permit boundary
will be provided and maintained at this site. Along with the permit boundary buffers, overburden
berms are/will be provided to visually shield the operation from the adjoining neighbors. The Mine
Map clearly depicts all buffers and proposed berms that will be located at the site.
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT
may be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within
the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all
buffer locations and widths on the mine map(s).
Existing streams within the permit boundary will have a 50' undisturbed buffer.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
minimum 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
To assure slope stability adjacent to adjoining properties during mining, slope and excavation
configurations will take into account structural geology, rock mechanics, and mining engineering
considerations. Final excavation grades for all unconsolidated overburden material will be on a
3:1 minimum slope around the outer quarry perimeter from natural ground to the top of bedrock.
Further, a minimum ten -foot (10') wide safety bench will be provided at the base of any cut slope
and the top of bedrock in this same area.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine maps) for all fill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburden
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any
benches andlor slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the method of
final stabilization.
See construction details on the attached mine map.
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be
provided on the mine map(s).
Final excavation slopes of unconsolidated materials along the outer quarry perimeter will be
graded on a 2:1 minimum slope from natural ground and will extend to a minimum of six feet (6')
below the anticipated water level. Internal slopes will be graded on a 1.5:1, or flatter where such
areas are anticipated to be above the final water elevation. A minimum ten -foot (10') wide safety
bench will be provided at the base of any cut sloe around the quarry perimeter where such areas
are anticipated to be above the final water elevation.
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
A typical pit cross-section is provided on the Mine Map. The first bench is largely controlled by
the existing topography. Lower benches will be consistent of the typical 40' vertical heights and
10' horizontal bench widths between each level.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
All structures within the vicinity of the existing mine excavation are indicated on the Mine Map. With
the exception of any proposed on -site support facilities, the closet neighboring occupied structure is
located greater than three hundred (300') from the future pit excavation. Blasting activities will be
designed and monitored to ensure that vibration and air blast standards are not exceeded.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder

I . I

APPLICATION FOR A MININP PERMIT •
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
The bighwall area of the quarry will be "barricaded" by the use of earthen berms, fencing, oversized
boulders, or a combination of these items to prevent inadvertent public entry. A ten -foot (10') wide
horizontal safety bench will also be provided between the top of the bedrock and the toe of any excavated
cut slopes around the outer quarry perimeter.
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No ®.
,pro
how will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or
other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine maps) and provide cross -
sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
Existing trees, terrain, and visual berms will effectively screen the majority of our operation from
public view. Trees and vegetation will be planted as needed to promote future long-term screening
and soil stability.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
None known to be present.
11. Will explosives be used? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, specify the types ofexplosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Depending on the mine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information may be
required on the blasting program (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest offsite
occupied structures) to the proposed excavations) on the mine map and indicate its approximate
distance to the proposed excavation.
ANFO (ammonium nitrate and fuel oil) and water -based emulsions are the primary -blasting agents used.
Blasting will be conducted under the direction of experienced and qualified personnel. Blasts will be
monitored at all times by seismograph to ensure that vibration and air blast levels are within the guidelines
set by the State. Shot patterns will be designed in consideration of the geological environment, (i.e., faults,
fractures, and lithology) maximize material breakage, and prevent any physical hazards to persons or
neighboring property. Blast designs will also be based upon the distance to the nearest dwelling from the
blast site and the weight of explosives per blast interval (pounds detonated per eight (8) millisecond delay),
which will consistently yield predictable blast vibration levels well within all regulatory limits at subject
structures. Records of each blast will be maintained, and will include pertinent data such as the number of
holes, pattern, delay intervals, depth and size of holes, type and total pounds of explosives, maximum
pounds per delay interval, amount of stemming and burden for each hole, and blast location. Blast and
seismograph records will be kept in a NCDENR approved blasting guidelines format.
12, Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes ® NoEl
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
Indicate the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Fuel oil, waste oil and gasoline will be stored in aboveground tanks located within adequately
sized containment structure(s). A Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC Plan) has
been prepared for the facility, which details the procedures to be followed in the event of a spill.

e

APPLICATIQN FOR A MININPPERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
l . Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or
establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other
pollution. This information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with
the information provided on the mine map(s). In addition, design information, including typical
cross -sections, of any permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the
location(s) of all permanent channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Reclamation of disturbed areas will be an ongoing part of the operating plan. Disturbed areas will be
graded and revegetated in accordance with the seeding schedule as provided.
At such time as the decision is made to terminate operations at this site, all remaining disturbed areas will
be graded, seeded and stabilized. The excavation will be allowed to fill with water providing a large lake
for water storage, supply, recreation, or other use to be determined by the landowner.
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes ® No [].
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed body(s) ofwater. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes ❑ No ®.
If yes, specify species.
The pit and supply lake will remain as permanent water impoundment use. The average depth of water in
the pit will be determined by the ultimate depth of the pit at the time operations are terminated, but in no
case will be less than a six foot (6') minimum depth. The stocking feasibility with fish will be left to the
discretion of the landowner and the future plans once mining has stopped.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map,
A minimum ten -foot (10') wide safety bench wiil remain along the top bench around the entire pit. A
perimeter fence will be placed around all excavations upon completion of the mining operation unless
alternate plans for the property are pre -approved through the Division of Land Resources.
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine
waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for
such areas must he provided on the reclamation map.
Overburden will be utilized to grade/construct internal roads and as fill material for perimeter screening
berms. All fill slopes will be stabilized/seeded once complete.
Overburden, refuse, spoil banks, or other mine waste areas existing at final reclamation will be graded and
compacted to slopes of 2:1 or flatter and will be vegetated in accordance with the seeding schedule. All
areas will be graded to provide positive drainage and stabilized to prevent erosion.
S. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT •
All processing facilities will be dismantled. Salvageable equipment will be hauled off -site for use at
other Martin Marietta operations. Equipment that cannot be reused will be disposed/recycled in
accordance with all local, State, and Federal regulations. Stockpiles will be removed, and the affected
area graded to conform to surrounding topography. These areas will then be scarified and revegetated.
Haul roads and roadways not necessary for future development will also be scarified and revegetated
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, identifi such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and
ditch line sta_biliration
The main haul road and service roads will remain for vehicular access to the lake formed by the pit.
These roads shall be stabilized while the quarry is active. Other roads to remain will be determined
by the future use of the site after operations have ceased.
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables,
or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off -site ene�rated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without nior written approval
from t eh NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and
either the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permn
has been issued by DWM for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application.
All temporary and permanent refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated on the mine map(s) and
reclamation map, along with a fist of items to be disposed in said areas.
No off -site generated waste will be allowed on -site. Waste products generated through typical
quarrying activities (i.e. scrap metal, cables, drill steel, etc.) may be disposed on -site in a designated
area but will typically be removed by a local scrap metal dealer. All other waste products such as
batteries, used oil, junked equipment, etc. will be recycled and/or disposed of off -site by private
collection firms.
7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for year-round seedingincluding the time of seeding and the amount and
type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings
is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the NC Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service,
specialists and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest
Resources at North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the NC Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services;
f. N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
gg N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre): According to soil tests, or 3,000 lb./acre
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre): According to soil tests,
or apply 10-10-10 at a rate of 500 lbs./acre.
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEARROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes] Will follow schedule rot NC Surface Mining
Manual.

APPLICATION FOR A MININPPERMIT •
Seed Tvues: Seeding Dates: Seeding Rates:
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF
ANCHORING:
Apply 4,000 — 5,000 lbs./acre grain straw or an equivalent cover of another suitable mulching material.
Anchor mulch by tacking with asphalt, roving, or netting.
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS — TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Virginia or Loblolly pines will be planted as needed to improve area screening.
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature _NC Surface Mining Manual _ Date.
Print Name
Title
Agency

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S.
74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to
carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant
to G.S. 74.59.
LANDOWNER:
APPLICANT:
Signature: Signature:'
Print Name JJJ.Ti6et Print Name: John Jibed
(Title, if appli le)
Company: Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. Title: President Mid -Atlantic Division
Address: 2710 Wvcliff Road Company: Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Raleiah, NC 27607 Mine Name: East Alamance Ouarry
Telephone:[phone] Telephone:[phone]
Date Signed: /n .I9, /7 Date Signed: _ /p. 4 /7
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page I of this application.
One oripinal and five (5) conies of the completed anolication, six (6) conies of all location mans. mine mans
and reclamation ma s and the a ro riate rocessin fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a
check or money order payable to t e orth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality must he sent
to the Raleieh Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].

syscs
uMCI
F
m.......n
.
/ n
.,........
f
i
_...
,
{
i
+.
..S
o
. -..
.,
t
i
r
i
� 1
f
1
]]
8
1,
Y
=.mac_ �.4•
.u��w�+c

4-
East Alamance Quarry 41v1 � %
h qrI
Green Level
W�
i kM�
g � tirq an
Ps
�y
e
East Alamance Quarry
2261 Martin Marietta Drive
Burlington, NC 27215
Mc tin East Alamance Quarry
Marietta Roadway Map

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 0 6.63 -Rack Dam Sediment Basin Calculations
wide Class a Rip Rap Be Dle
DATE October 19, 2017
BASIN 1. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN — AC Max. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN — AC
To=S MIN INTENSITY(Isd = 7.03 C= 0.60
INTENSITY (1v) = 831
Q25=CIA= 0.6 x 8.21 x 6.00 29.56 ON
QIO=CIA= 0.6 x 7.03 x 6.0D = 2531 Cris
MDUMUM VOLUME REQUIRED i 6.OD x 3600 = CF
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED Qts 25.31 x 435 = SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
Ba"em
Storage
Spilheay,
Top
DEPTH OF STORAGE=
3
Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
2,205
Cu. FL
Dimensions= Top Width 2; Bottom Width 8'
Height 3' (l:l side sloWs)
Length =Basin Storage Length
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = �Cu.Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT=
4
Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT
6
Ft
SPR,LWAY-L-(Qu)/(3 xb") =
10
Ft
Spillway Flow DepOs(0)— I
1. W as
de
volume
nos. vol
R773
0
0
0
147
151
77
SI 112,2311
3
4
30.141
11,775
30141
4L916
159
89 14,151
6
26,382
68,298
•Inside elopes g 2:1
2,205 Vahme Cu. Ft.
Use Minimum of lo'

Qii��/ ��V is,,�t�A � /� � t�7 � V A� �i-c-1 %•—i
ca
Stockpile�
r / �' h� �I1 I,��',clam
�ti�'�, r / / - . ces . Stockpile.
Plant, ProJ n .i
p' �?� —�
11� Full
Settling Cells & Pond
Pine Storage Area
Sri ✓ // �'�
y
./moo
pro
1�
_ (Ci;ttstegher
l -i -
_ poA Ashton Sandra
r
Vinccnl
` Vlrgina7'owling l \�
Legend
Drainage Area -
Maft East Alamance Quarry x"'E:1
D Area Ma #2 �T
Marietta Drainage P
o t�

4) •

- � �,, - -
. �- �,-.�
r
Y
u _
R �„
f�l- ,�
_�.{� � , � 11j ..

i

FA

r

y
n�
y �-�;
H __ .e+
v' r 4'
. �`__.

Ak
_r

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and Subsidiaries
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT Sys%°�a°a3
FPfR 9vt'C AP Denton, NC
372 Emest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
Pemdttee: Martin Marietta
Blast No.: 12 Blest Type. Stone Quarry/Stone Mine - Production Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-005)
Date/time: 07/26/201712:25 PIVPermh: MARTIN MARIETTA-EASTALAMANCE/ laamer. bench N2 east wall
INCO071D
ENVIRONMENT
Method Used: Lat/Lang.
Weather. Clear Wlssd Foam: N
Temperature: 92 T
Terrain: Flat Wind Velocity: 0-S M/h
Blast LatAnng: 360 7' 45100" N 700 21' 43.399" W
NEAREST PROTECTED STRUCTURE
Compass Polar NW
Structure Name: Structure 1
Dlrection/Bearing: 317 '
Structure Type: Dwelling
Distance: 1878ft
Structure mt/Long.: 36' 7' 58.80W N 706 21' 58.860" W
LAYOUT How Depth: 43.0 ft Mrterial Blessed: Granite Total Drilling Footage: 1,935.0 ft
No. of Holes: 45 Subdrilling: 3.0 ft Burden:
10.0 ft Water Depth: 10.0 ft
N0. of V.P. Holes: 45 Face Height 40.0 ft Spacing:
12.0 ft Stem length: }QO R.
No. of Rows: 3 Drilling Angle: 01 Back Fill Depth:
0.0 ft Area Type. Conventional
Diameter. Sin Mats Used No Stem Type: 78
Method: Specified
t V.P. = Volume Producing
(H = 40.0 ft)
WEIGHTS Max Wt of Expl. in Overlapped Decks:
754.7 lb Volume Produced: 8,000.0 yd'
Initiation: Electronic Max Wt. of Expl. Per 8 ms Interval:
7S4.7 Is, Weight Produced: 18,400A t
Firing Device: E`Star Blasting Max. No. of Holes Per 8 ms Interval:
2 Powder Factor 1: 1.084 t/lb
Machine (WRFD)
Other Method: Max Wt of Explosive Per Hale:
377.3 lb Powder Factor 2: 2.122 Ib/yd'
Mfg and Model: DANMAR Max. Allow. Chg. M. per 8 ms w/o Selo.:
1,410.9 lb Rork Density: 2.300 t/yd'
Initiation Settings: Actual Scaled Distance Factor
68.36 Scaled Distance Factor Used; D/W%=50
Series Resistance (ohms):
SEISMOGRAPH I - SEISMOGRAPH I
Data Type: Peak PPV Only Seismograph Type: ---
Date: 07/26/17 Trigger Level: --- M/s ---
dB Transverse: --- iNs --- HE
Time: Calibration Data
Vertical: --- m/s --- Hz
Distance From Blast 1,878.00ft Calibration Signal:
Longitudinal:---in/s ---Hz
Direction From Blast NW Geophone Min. Grp.: --- Hz
PpV: 0.09 in/s 14.6 Hz
Readout: Printed Copy Mic. Min. Freq.: --- Hz
Acoustic: 117 de
Location:
Vector Sum:---in/s
Let./Long.: 36" 7' 58.800" N 70" 21' 58,860"W
Reader and Firm: Deep Earth, Deep Earth
RECEIVED
Analyst and Firm:
Installer and Firm:
SEP 11 2017
Page 1 of 5
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Blast ID: m00888802-10117 Vernon: 72.4.59 Print Date: 7/26/2017

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and Subsidiaries
. VgLQYfe3� AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT Je�OFyO33
4F `I .4FV `�.
Pq btu AP Denton, NC ER seta
372 Ernest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
Permittee: Martin Marietta
Blast No.: 12 Fund Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine - Production Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-005)
Date/Time: 07/26/202712:25 Pit/Permit MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST ALAMANCE/ Location: bench a2 east wall
CREW
Blestomunedotharthanccheduladtima: No
Mudirs Ocarted: No
Protective Cover
shooting louse
___-_-
IartNeme
_____
FirstName Uceme/cert
2nd Uceoe/Cert In Charge
TiedM
Dirk Tie -In Driller
layout
BRITT
JOSHUA, 'NC - N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
D
BROWN
DARIUS,E
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
MOUNT
NED, O
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
PHILUPS
TIMOTHY,
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
M
PRODUCTSAND SERVICES
Number
11782
15002
15030
12276
07696
A0007
Produn Description
E•Star Booster -1 lb.
30' EaSTAR Detonator - QM
60' E•STAR Detonator - QM/HD
E'STAR Bus Wire- 1,250'
Hydromite 4400 Bulk
Blast Service -large Shot
Signature of Blaster in Charge
Quamity
Weight(lb)
90.00 ea
91.80
45.00 an
0.00
45.00 ea
0.00
1.00 so
0.00
16,888.20 lb
16,888.20
1.00 as
0.00
Total Weight of Explosives Include Pdmm) (lb):
16,980,00
Page 2 of 5 Blast Ilk m00888802-10117 Version: 7.2A.59 Print Data. 7/26/2017

3.
w
O
O
O
O
O ® O
O
O
O O
Page 3 of 5 Blast ID: ru00888802-10117 Version: 7.2.4.59 Print Date: 7/26/2017

Hole
Load
Surface
Delay
Deck 1
Del.
M
Load
41
0
344
ZZ2
Load
#1
0
292
ZZ3
Load
#1
0
260
ZZ4
Load
#1
0
228
ZZ5
Load
#1
0
196
ZZ6
Load
#1
0
164
ZZ7
Load
#1
0
340
ZZB
Load
#1
0
284
ZZ9
Load
#1
0
236
ZZ10
Load
#1
0
204
ZZ11
Load
#1
0
172
ZZ12
Load
#1
0
212
ZZ13
Load
#1
0
180
ZZ14
Load
#1
0
148
ZZ15
Load
#1
0
132
ZZ16
Load
#1
0
436
ZZ17
Load
#1
0
420
ZZ18
Load
#1
0
404
ZZ19
Load
#1
0
380
ZZ20
Load
#1
0
364
ZZ21
Load
#1
0
348
ZZ22
Load
#1
0
332
7Z23
Load
#1
0
316
ZZ24
Load
#1
0
300
ZZ25
Load
#1
0
268
ZZ26
Load
#1
0
308
ZZ27
Load
#1
0
276
ZZ28
Load
#1
0
244
ZZ29
Load
#1
0
100
ZZ30
Load
#1
0
116
ZZ31
Load
#1
0
492
ZZ32
Load
#1
0
476
ZZ33
Load
#1
0
460
ZZ34
Load
#1
0
444
ZZ35
Load
#1
0
398
ZZ36
Load
#1
0
372
ZZ37
Load
#1
0
356
ZZ38
Load
#1
0
324
ZZ39
Load
#1
0
252
ZZ40
Load
#1
0
220
ZZ41
Load
#1
0
188
ZZ42
Load
#1
0
156
ZZ43
Load
#1
0
140
ZZ44
Load
#1
0
124
ZZ45
Load
#1
0
109
Page 4 of 5 Blast ID'. ru00888802-10117 Version: 72.4.59 Print Date: 7/26/2017

a
loft
R 20 ft
2 _
0
m _
J
30 ft
O
40 ft
50 ft
o —
n
I Wad #1 1
ft] -GraM
Hy mm'
9lb
[MSD h] -1 lb
Roesly-.
Dea,02 1l-QMMD
e ll W9c 03Ib
•
•

• 0,

Operatla
TypeofShot
FmAs,GligrL—
Shot No.
Shot layout By rn f1.;ftxc r
Date Uk Out (.-90—
Shot GPS N 3k4D? 4 N9', 1
No. of Holes f4
w j9'a I' 43.4
Hole Diameter S
Burden /6 Spacing
NNOB GPS N
Measured Face Hak" 0
w
Mmr Weldelay
Actual ds
Predicted Vibration
PRODUCTS
Type Truck
Anro Emulsion
- 9
®®®�®ace 0©0©®7
® 00®
�a� © O O
000®-,;0©0
® ® uu
ypo
•
•

Shot No. !y
Date Laid Out &- 30
No. of Holes LI
Hole Diameter
Burden /o Spacing
Measured Face Height
Type of Slot J
Shot Layout By
Shot GPS I
W
NNOB GPS N
W
Max OWdelay _
Actual ds
Predicted Vhra
PRODUCTS
Type Truck
Anfo
Emulsion
O
Surface delays
•
•'

Martin Marietta East Alemance
NvnW.01°
Seismograph Lac: Evans (2119 Sandy Cross Rd)
D°` 7mit57
Seismograph GPS: N 36d 07' 58.8" W 70d 21' 58.86"
Wnne x mi-S.. SIN: 1910
Dee Earth Logic John Babcock 540-974-1029
P W ( )
SAS mare, 0o2m I�
An TAW. 12a4
Semple nea: 11324
Demon 6.0 Semis
Pre-Tha9en o.SO Semw
Omx 2m
Valli 7.0
Peaks and Fretuendes
Graph Informalion
PPV Maximum: 0.0900 Wm(0.1279 am)
Duration:.0.500 a To: 6.000a
Amuatic: 117 dBL @ 3.7 Hx (1.4634 am)
Acoustic Scale: 126 d9L
Radial: 0.0500 Ydaac®2SAHz(OAM sec)
Seismic Sole: 0.20 int(O.OW iNaec/divi
Vertical 0.0650 inlsec @ 56 Mir (0.3975 sec)
Time Intervals: 1.0) sec
Transverse0.0900 in/sec ®14.6Hx (0.1279 am)
Amlera0an: 0.04N a
Displacement: 0.00 Min
last Calibration OSM: 312272017
Cal 0.960K
Cal 0.495 OK
R
CM 045 0K
Cal 0.505Ok
T II
4.50 0.50 1.50 2W
3.W 4.50
5.50
Particle
VNocay Verne Firs uenry- t19BM Undo (RI
6507, 19W)
ID
Wssl
10. Veiucai
10 Trnrovase
1.0
1.0I
1.0
0.10
0.10
0.10.
x
■
xvy
%x
a
xxx xx
% %
x
x xxx
x xxM
• xx
xx
xx x
xK
xmxx
x as x
aN xxx
x x x xx
nc xx
0.01
10 100
0,011
0 100
0.011
0 100
F
lMb4FM�lr. VW,w9nn 111

00poo,
.•
Blaat No.: 13
0
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and subsidiaries
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT MO Iaa
AP Denton, NC
372 Ernest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
Blast Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine -Production
Date/fime: 08/10/201712:26 PWPmnk MARTIN MARIEETA-EASTALAMANCE/
J®3
•4�RR Bt0
Permittme MARTIN MARIEETA
Customer. MARTIN MARIETFA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-002)
Iaration: 3RD BENCH ELEV 476
ENVIRONMENT
Method Used: Lat./Long. Weather Cloudy/High Wind From: SSE
Clouds
Temperature: 69 °F Terrain: Hilly Wind Velocity: B-10 M/h
Blast tatAong.: 36' 7' 44.240' N 79' 21' 47.070" W
NEAREST PROTECTED STRUCTURE Compete Point NW
Structure Nama: 2119 SANDY CROSS RD Direction/Bearing: 326 °
Stmctura Type: Dwelling Distance: 1762 ft
Structure IatAong.: 360 7' 58.800" N 79' 21' 58.1 W
LAYOUT
Hole Depth:
31.0-53.0 ft Material Started: Granite
Total Drilling Frontage:
2,596.0 it
Na of Holes:
61 Subdrilling:
3.O it Burden: (See Below[
Water Depth:
max 5.0it
No. of V.P.t Holes:
62 Face Height
28.0-50.0 ft Spacing: i5ee Below]
Stem tenth:
min 10.0 it
No. of Rows:
[See Below] Drilling Angle:
0. Back Fill Depth:
0.0 it
Area Type:
is" Below]
Diameter.
5 in Mats Used:
No Stem Type: 78
Method:
(See Below]
i V.P.-Volume Producing
WEIGHTS
Max. WL of Expl. in Overlapped Decks:
921.0 Be
Volume produced:
10,573.3 yds
Initiation:
Electronic
Max M. of Expl. Per a ms Interval:
gifts 'r
Weight Produced:
24,318.6 1
Firing Dedce:
E•Star Blasting
Max, No. of Holes Per 8 ms interval:
2
Powder Factor 1:
1.192 tpb
Machine (W RFD)
Other Method:
Max WL of Explosive Per Hole:
489.5 Ile
Powder Factor 2:
1.929 Ib/ydr
Mfg and Model:
DAN MAR
Max Allow. Chg. We par 8 ms w/o Geis.:
1,026.3 fib
Rock Uer iK
2.300 Vyds
Initiation Settings:
Actual Scaled Distance Factor
58.06
Scaled Distance Factor Used: D/W44=55
Sales Resistance
(ohms):
SEISMOGRAPH I - EVANS
Data Type:
Seismic Record Seismograph Type:
WHITE MINI SETS
Date:
08/10/17 Trigger Leval:
--- in/s --- till
Transverse:
0.12 lava
22.2 Ifz
Time:
11:16 Calibration Date:
03/22/17
Vertical:
0.06 ints
46.5 Hz
Distance From Blast
1,762.00ft Calibration Signal
tangitudinal:
0.09 in/s
26.9 He
Direction From Blast:
NW Geophone Min. Free.:
--- Hz
PPV:
--- in/s
___ He
Readout
Mic Min. Free.:
--- Hz
Acoustic
120 dB
Location:
Vector Bum:
---In/s
Lot/Long.:
36' 7' 58.800" N
79° 2158.860"W
Read" and Firm:
JOHN BABCOCI4 deep earth
Analyst and Firm:
john babcock
Installer and Firm:
deep earth
Page 1 of 7 Blast ID: m00749702-10091 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/10/2017

J6�p"7a33
0
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and Subsidiaries
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT
AP Denton, NC
372 Ernest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
4' 0-ZO, .
sFke .e°c
as
Parmilree: MARTIN MARIEETA
Blast No.:
13 Blast Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine -Production
Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-002)
Date/fime:
08/10/202711:16 Ph/Permit MARTIN MARIEETA-EAST ALAMANCE /
Location: 3RD BENCH ELEV 476
1NCO0886
CREW
Sint occurred other than scheduled time: No
Misfirecharted: No
Protective Cover blasthouse
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Name
First Name Uceme/can
2nd License/Cart In Charge
Tied In ChL Tie -In Driller layout
PAINTER
MATTHEW •NC - N/A
Yes
Yes Yes No No
,5
BRIR
JOSHUA,
No
No No No Yes
D
BROWN
DARIUS, E
No
Yes Yes No No
FULLER
HENRY, H
No
Yes Yes No No
HAYES
JEFFREY
No
Yes Yes No No
PHILLIPS
TIMOTHY,
No
No No No No
M
POOLE
DEVEN, L
No
Yes Yes No No
PRODCCTSANDSERWCES
Number
Product Desorption
Quantity Weight (lb)
11782
E•Star Booster- Ilb.
122.00 a 124.44
15002
30' E•STAR Detonator - QM
57.00 ea 0.00
15030
60' E`STAR Detonator- QM/HD
65.00 ea 0.00
12276
E'STAR Bus Wire-1,250'
1,00 sp 0.00
05159
Austinite 15 Bulk
2,180.00 lb 2,180.00
12528
Empty-WPP Shot Bag 31/2 x 48-Plain
15.00 ea 0.00
11087
Hydromite 4600-Bulk
18,095.56 lb 19,095.56
A0007
Blast Service -Large Shot
1.00 n 0.00
A0625
Other -Remote Firing Device Charge
1.00 n 0.00
Total Weight of Exploelves
Include Primers) (lb): 20,400.00
COMMEN7S /-E,XPPLANATIONS
Signature of Blaster In Charge
Page 2 of 7 Blast ID: m00749702-10091 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/10/2017

0 0

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and Subsidiaries
AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT �6E°fe3�
4 Y�� AP Denton, NC �4FPeR a"'0�•
372 Ernest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
Permittes: MARTIN MARIEETA
alas No.: 13 Blast Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine - Production Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-002)
Date rime: 09/10/201711:16 Pit/Permit MARTIN MARIEETA-EASTALAMANCE/ location: 3RD BENCH EL.EV476
INC00886
Passive: I
No. of Holes:
60
Hole Depth:
31.0-53.0 ft
Surden:
10.0 ft Area Type:
Conventional
No. of V.P.t Holes:
61
Subdrilling:
3.0 ft
Spacing:
12.0 it Method:
Specified
No. of Rove:
4
Face Height:
28.0-50.0 it
(H = 39.0 ft)
Drilling Angle:
0 '
Total Volume for pattern:
10,573.3 yds
t V.P. = Volume Producing
Total vrzight for petal
24,318.7 t
Possem: 1
No. of Holes:
1
Hole Depth:
46.0 ft
Burden:
10.0 R Am Type:
Conventional
No. of V,M1t Holes:
1
Subdrilling:
3.0 ft
Spacing:
12.0 it Method:
Specified
No. of Rases:
1
Face Height:
43.0 ft
(H = 0.0 ft)
DHlling Angle:
0 '
Total volume for pattern:
0.0 yes
t V.P. = Volume Producing
Total vielght for pattern:
0.0 t
Total blast volume:
10,573.3 yds
Total weight produced:
24,318.7 t
Page 3 of 7 Blast ID: m00749702-10091 Version: 7.3.3.2
Print Date: 8/10/

000�o
o �
®©O
0 0
B
o
QA
�
O
o
0
°oa
o
o
0
0
o
o
®
o
Q
O
0
O
®Q
Page 4 of 7 Blast ID: ru00749702-10091 Version: 7.3.32 Print Date. 8/10/2017

ZZ7
Load#10
0
505
ZZ8
Load #10
0
489
ZZ9
Load 46
0
441
ZZIO
Load #5
0
409
ZZ31
Load #4
0
393
ZZ12
Load#3
0
377
ZZ23
Load #9
0
136
ZZ14
Load #12
O
88
ZZIS
Load #12
0
72
ZZ36
Load#12
0
40
ZZ17
Load #5
0
40
ZZ38
Load #3
0
24
ZZ19
Load #1
0
163
ZZ20
Load #3
0
8
Z726
Load #11
0
569
ZZ27
Load #11
0
521
ZZ28
Load #9
0
473
ZZ29
Load #11
0
400
ZZ30
Load #11
0
284
ZZ31
Load #10
0
268
ZZ32
Load #10
0
152
ZZ33
Load #7
0
120
ZZ34
Load #7
0
104
ZZ35
Load #4
0
88
ZZ36
Load #5
0
72
ZZ37
Load #12
0
56
ZZ38
Load #5
0
56
ZZ39
Load #1
0
147
ZZ40
Load #3
0
16
ZZ46
Load #11
0
553
ZZ47
Load #11
0
448
ZZ48
Load #1
0
281
ZZ49
Load #5
0
425
ZZ50
Load #3
0
361
ZZ51
Load #2
0
345
ZZ52
Load #10
0
307
ZZ53
Load #9
0
291
ZZ54
Load #6
0
259
ZZ55
Load #5
0
227
ZZ56
Load #2
0
179
ZZ57
Load #3
0
128
ZZ58
Load #2
0
96
ZZ59
Load #2
0
80
ZZ60
Load #3
0
32
ZZ65
Load #11
0
585
ZZ66
Load #I1
0
537
ZZ67
Load #11
0
601
ZZ68
Load #8
0
451
ZZ69
Load #1
0
214
ZZ70
Load #11
0
432
ZZ71
Load #2
0
329
ZZ72
Load #1
0
313
ZZ73
Load #1
0
297
ZZ74
lead #8
0
275
ZZ75
Load #4
0
243
ZZ76
Load #3
0
211
ZZ77
Load #2
0
195
ZZ78
Load #3
0
112
ZZ79
Load #2
0
64
ZZ80
Load #2
0
48
Page 5 of 7 Blast ID: ru00749702-10091 Version: 7.3.32 Pdnt Date: 8/10/2017

0 •

• 0
r
IR I"10 Is I®�
Page 6 of 7 Blast ID: mOD749702-10091 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/10/2017

O

Load #11
a
loft
Ci?-f70
M
H
< 30 ft
0
50 ft
o —
Load #12
•
7

O �

SHOT ?Y
Sundml —
Operation /�tvrt;
Type of Shot
Shot No.
Shot Layout By_
Date Laid Out C 9�?b/,z47
Shot GPS N
No. of Holes (ems
W
HoleDianneter 54
Burden /C' Spacing )�'
NNOB PS N
Measured Face Heigh
W
Direction
Max Ibs/delay _
Actual ds _
Predicted Vbmtiw
PRODUCTS
Type Truck
Anfo
Emulsion
Detonators
Surface delays
8'd-R
��i�Aes 6a3- 1; h eg
r.5�.. �hp�t5 eo1M@1*1' 9
td- a
.Y
1 f 4 kar'
♦ 3*."4 3
d. hd/t:
T ! t0 14 n H M. W M i $. 3 3- Is
oll
Ell
•
r�
u

0 0

• "ApEarth
L O G I C
tin Marietta East Alamance "'"n°`
;mograph Loc: Evans (2119 Sandy Cross Rd) o vfO9
lmograph GPS: N 36d 07' S8.8e W 70d 21' 58.860 sells aalsaa an:l
ip Earth Logic John Babcock (540-974-1029) aaa. T�:T�In,
same.naa:1
Damonad aaoo
Pr*-Tdatar: a.ae aaa
Gels:
Visalia
Pea" and Frequencies Graph Inrormallm
Maximum: 0.1201nmec (0.3281 sac) Duration: 4.500 a To: SAW a
mc: 120 dBL IS 5.5 Hz (1.3a38 sec) M manic Scale: 126 dBL
It 0.00001Neac@20.9M (0.2586 vac) Seismic Scab: 0.20 INeae(0.0501Naaeldiv)
oal. 0 0600 in/sec @ 46 SFIz (01250 sec) Time Inlervels: 1.00 sec
wen e. 0.120 mmec @ 22.21tr (0.3281 sac)
Call
ti
Cal
Cal 0.50

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and Subsidiaries
J EO�1
e33 AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT
•6fkER 5v�o4° AP Denton, NC
372 Ernest Smith Road Dentoq NC 27239
Personnels: MARTIN MARIEETA
Stan No.: 14 Blase Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine - Production Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-005)
Date/Fime: 08/16/2017 23:33 MVPermit MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST ALAMANt.E/ Location: 3RD BENCH ELEV $16
INC00710
ENVIRONMENT
Method Used: Lad./Long. Weather. Clear Wind From: NNE
Temperature: 96 °F Terrain: Hilly Wind Vdocity. 1-2 M/h
Blast lat/Lorg.: 366 7' 45.600" N 79° 21' 43.000" W
NEARESTPROTECTED STRUCTURE Compass Point NW
StructureName: 2119 SANDY CROSS RD Direnion/Beadrg: 315 °
StructureType: Dwelling Distance:
Structure LatAon9: 360 7' 58.900" N 790 21' 58.9604W
LAYOUT Hole DepM a• Material Blasted: Granite Total Drilling Footage: 2,184.0 k
No. of Holee 5ubdrilling: 3.0 k Burden: 10.O it Water Depth: max 5.O k
t
No. of V.P. Holes: 48 Face Heigh: 40.0-44.0 it Spacing: 12.O it Stem Lengb: min 8.0 it
No of Rows: 3 Drilling Angle: 0° Beck Fill Depth: 0,0k Area Type: Conventional
Diameter. w-t0n:'r 'Mats Used: No Stem Type: 78 Method: Specified
t V.P. - Volume Producing (H = 43.0 R)
WEIGHTS Max. Wt of Expl, in Overtopped Decks: 794.1 lb Volume Produced: 9,173.3 Tits
Initiation: Electronic Max Wt of Expl. Per B ms Interval: 794.1 Be Weigh Produced: 22,098.61
Firing Device: E'Ster Blasting Max. No. of Holes Per B ma; Inteml: 2 Powder Factor 1: 1.202 t/Ib
Machine (WRFD)
Other Method: Max. Wt of Explosive Per Hole: - 397.2 lb Powder Factor 2: 1.914 Ib/yds
Mfg and Model: DAN MAR Max. Allow. Chg. Wt. par 8 ms w/o Seia: 1,148.6 Ib Rock Density. 2.300 t/yds
Initiation Settings: Actual Scaled Distance Fedor: 66.15 Scaled Pastures Factor Used: D/WV =55
Series Resistance (ohms):
SEISMOGRAPH I -EVANS
Data Type:
Seismic Record Seismograph Type:
WHITE MINI SETS
Date:
08/16/17 Trigger Level:
--- in/s --- dB
Tnnsveme:
.,0165-I1sto "
*720pFFFlE'
Time:
13:33 Calibration Date:
03/22/17
Vertical:
0.065 Inns
39.3 Nor
Distance From Blast
1,864.00k Calibration Slgnak
LongRudinat
0.13 1Nr
25.6 Nz
Direction From Blast:
NW Geophone Min. Free.:
--- Hz
PPV:
--- In/s
Readout
Mic. Min. Free:
--- Hz
AcouNe
Location:
Vector Sum:
yWwwm/a.wr
---bus
Lat.Aong:
360 7' 58.800' N
79. 21' 58.860"W
Reader and Firm:
JOHN BABCOCK deep earth
Me" and Firm:
John babcock
Installer and Firm:
deep earth
Page 1 of 5 Blast ID: m007497D2-10093 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/16/2017

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY and SubelaWin
�5E0.10 AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY BLAST REPORT �yE°•�e��
•4� `�•
FR s�N AP Denton, NC 4•q s�N
372 Emest Smith Road, Denton, NC 27239
Penalties: MARTIN MARIEETA
Blast No.: 14 Blest Type: Stone Quarry/Stone Mine -Production Customer. MARTIN MARIETTA-EAST
ALAMANCE
(245599-005)
Daturnme: 08/26/201713:33 PltAsennit MARTIN MARIETTA-EASTALAMANCE / Location: 3RD BENCH ELEV 516
INC00710
CREW
Blast occurred other than scheduled time: No Misfire Occurred: No Protective Cover blast house
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left Name First Name License/Lett ]MOceme/Cent In Charge Tredln Chic Te-in Driller Layout
PAINTER MATTHEW *NC -N/A Yes Yes Yes No Yes
,S
POWERS DAVID,L No Yes Yes No No
STRIDER RICHARD, No Yes Yes No No
I
PRODUCTS AND SER VICItS
Number Product DescaPticn Quantity Weight(Ib)
21782 E*Star Booster -1Its. 96.00 es 97.92
15002 30' E*STAR Detonator - QM 48.00 as ODD
15030 60'E*STAR Detonator -QM/HD 48.00 as 0.00
12276 E*STAR Bus Wire- 1,250' 1.00 sp DDDD
I1066 Hydromite 4400 - Bulk 17,462.08 lb a,' l.'a!A2'o
12981 Mini Stem Plug - 6015 48.00 ea 0.00
A0007 Blast Service -large Shot 1.00 ea 0.00
A0625 Other -Remote Firing Device Charge 1.00 as 0.00
Total Weight of Esplosi res (hdude Primers) (lb): A560,00 •
COMMENTS / EXPLANATIONS
Signature of Blaster in Charge
Page 2 of 5 Blast ID: mDO749702-10093 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/16/2017

• 0

N
N
®
O
N
®
O
N
ON
O
O
O
N
M
Ob
T
r
N
O
�
M
O
O
N
N
O
8
B
N O N
N
Page 3 of 5 Blast ID: ru00749702-10093 Version: 7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/16/2017

0 0

..
•
Hole
Load
Surface
Deck 1
Delay
Delay
ZZ1
Load
#1
0
248
ZZ2
Load
#5
0
288
ZZ3
Load
#5
0
304
ZZ4
Load
#5
0
320
ZZ5
Load
#5
0
447
ZZ6
Load
#1
0
232
ZZ7
Load
#1
0
216
ZZ8
Load
#1
0
200
ZZ9
Load
#1
a
184
ZZ10
Load
#1
0
169
ZZ11
Load
#1
a
152
ZZ12
Load
#1
0
136
ZZ13
Load
02
0
104
ZZ14
Load
#2
a
72
ZZ15
Load
#2
0
48
ZZ16
Load
#2
0
32
ZZ17
Load
#3
0
16
ZZ18
Load
#3
0
8
ZZ19
Load
#3
0
24
ZZ20
Load
#3
0
40
ZZ21
Load
#4
0
56
ZZ22
Load
#4
0
88
ZZ23
Load
#4
0
120
ZZ24
Load
#5
0
272
ZZ25
Load
#5
0
240
ZZ26
Load
#5
0
224
ZZ27
Load
#5
0
192
ZZ28
Load
#5
0
160
ZZ29
Load
#S
0
228
ZZ30
Load
#5
0
96
ZZ31
Load
#S
0
80
ZZ32
Load
#7
0
112
ZZ33
Load
#5
0
256
ZZ34
Load
#7
0
144
ZZ35
Load
#7
0
176
ZZ36
Load
07
0
208
ZZ37
Load
#5
0
422
ZZ39
Load
#5
0
397
ZZ39
Load
#5
0
372
ZZ40
Load
05
0
322
ZZ41
Load
#5
0
272
ZZ42
Load
#5
0
222
ZZ43
Load
05
0
172
ZZ44
Load
#5
0
147
ZZ45
Load
#7
0
197
ZZ46
Load
#7
0
247
Hole
Load
Surface
Deck 1
Delay
Delay
ZZ47
Load #7
0
297
ZZ48
Load #7
0
347
Page 4 of 5 Blast llk m00749702-10093 Version:7.3.3.2 Print Date: 8/16/2017

i 0

Wh
20 fr
< _
bfr
i
SUX
00600 f.at
HER
e
I
100*00
•
•

• 0

Operation
Type of Shot _
Shot No.
Shot Layout By _
Date Laid Out
Shot GPS N
No. of Holes
W
Hole Diameter
Burden Spacing
NNOB GPS N.
Measumd Face Height
W
Direction
Max Ibs/delay
Actual ds
Predicted Vibration
PRODUCTS
Type Truck
Anfo Emulsion
Or NY.
ra
is
Detonators
Surface delays
•

• 0

Date Laid Out
No. of Holes
Hole Diameter
Burden 16
Measured Face
Typeof Shot Prnr1u" •
Slot Layout By ry) F1,..kcC
Shot GPS N 31: D7'4S.1,
E)%c SIb W 19 .i.1 91,C
NNOB GPS N
W
sL-9-17 eb-10-0
IA 10 hotel
ss4r LW I
A=1.
Maxlbs/delay r/43•a9
Detonators_
Actual ds
_
Predicted Yrbradon
Surface delays
PRODUCTS
Typo Truck
Anfo _ Emulsion
�n1nl X4
i
N`
)I
"es
es
-l7
44 °.3fD, 403
)�@®C�Q�
��
st" 7'
I(D(Doff© c}lo cloo��I�c
L4 6
4/
rY
Sfo t 1'
�ar�,•,, ell,
•

h Lac: Evans (2119 Sandy Cross Rd)
h GPS: N 36d OT 58.80 W 70d 21' 58.86'
Logic John Babcock (540-974-1029)
Peeks and Frequencies
Maximum: 0.1651n1a¢ (0.4326 sec)
atic 119 del. @ 3.3 He(1. 5059 sect
e): 0.1001rdsec @ N." (0.4616 sec)
Cal 0065u (r, 39.3111 lit
averse: 0.165 inlsec @ 20.411z (0.4326 sec)
lare0rn: 0.07esq
adamant 0.00115 in
ff arth
L O G I C
Graph Information
Ion: -0.500 a To: 6.000 a
m<Seele: IN der
uc Scale: 020 inlsec (0.1M Was cldiv)
lydarva15 1 00 sec
Nmn6a
w ene
rime
M*aInISW SN:
SNe. Trailer. aozadl
ArTdW.
semlxe Ram:
Dmaam%eosa.
\Call DD..44955
V
Cal 0495
Cal 0.505
i
% %
0.10� 0.10', xx %
x
x x x
x
5% %
% % MM M
xx
x
x asxx% %x
x % xx
x - a x xx
x xm x as x xx

Wishner, Judy
From:
Davis, Tracy
Sent:
Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:24 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy
Cc:
Gantt, Matt; White, Sue; Vinson, Toby; Cole, Brad
Subject
FW: Martin Marietta Investigation Report Mine 01-08
Attachments:
MINE BLASTING COMPLAINT FORM.doa
Judy, if you have not done so already, please contact MM to see if they observed any fly rock on or around the date
alleged by the complainant in Sue's report. Also, please request and analyze the blast records for several blasts before
and after the alleged date to determine if there was elevated air blast readings that may support the claim of fly
rock. Lastly, you should follow up with the complainant to see if they can produce pictures of the fly rock on the roof
that they agreed to send us as part of our investigation.
Great job on your investigation and detailed report, Suel Much appreciated I
Thanks, Tracy
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 3:26 PM
To: Vinson, Toby <[e-mail]>; White, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cole, Brad <[e-mail]>; Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>; Wehner, Judy
<judy.wehner@ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Investigation Report Mine 01-09
Toby,
Please find attached Sue White's response to the Flyrock complaint at East Alamance Quarry. We have not received any
follow up pictures from Mr. Mace. Please let us know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Matt
From: White, Sue
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Gantt, Matt <matt.eanttCancdenr.cov>
Subject: Martin Marietta Investigation Report Mine 01-08
Hard Copy on your desk
Sue White, El
Assistant Regional Engineer
Department of Energy, Minerals and Land Resources
336-776-9661 office
sue.white(avincdenr. cov
Winston Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes MITI Road

• ,0

Winston Salem, NC 27106 • •
fmv �/'Nothing Convams.-
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

0 0

Wehner, Judy
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Tuesday, August 29, 2017 3:26 PM
To:
Vinson, Toby, White, Sue
Cc:
Cole, Brad; Davis, Tracy; Wehner, Judy
Subject:
FW: Martin Marietta Investigation Report Mine O1-08
Attachments:
MINE BLASTING COMPLAINT FORM.docc
Toby,
Please find attached Sue White's response to the flyrock complaint at East Alamance quarry. We have not received any
follow up pictures from Mr. Mace. Please let us know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Matt
From: White, Sue
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 20171:00 PM
To: Gantt, Matt <[e-mail]>
Subject: Martin Marietta Investigation Report Mine 01-08
Hard Copy on your desk
Sue White, El
Assistant Regional Engineer
Department of Energy, Minerals and Land Resources
336-776-9661 office
sue.whitefrDncdenr cov
Winston Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road
Winston Salem, INC 27106
'Nothing Compares✓.....
Email correspondence to and from this address is subiecf to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

• 0
Building Directly in Front of Gate Where Workers Took Photos of Fly Rock on Roof

Area to the left of Gate and Building. No Fly Rock Observed in Grassed Area.

Area to the right of Building. No Fly Rock observed.

0

• 0
MINE BLASTING COMPLAINT FORM
NAME OF PERMITTEE: Martin -Marietta East Alamance Quarry
MINE NAMEIMINING PERMIT NUMBER: 01-08
COUNTY: Alamance
COMPLAINANT'S NAME: Jerry Mace
ADDRESS: 2227 Sandy Cross Road, Burlington, NC
PHONE #: [phone]
APPROX. DISTANCE OF COMPLAINANTS PROPERTY TO MINE:
DATE OF SEVERE BLAST: The date of blasting was approximately August 11, 2017
WEATHER CONDITIONS DURING THE BLASTS IN QUESTION, IF KNOWN: Partly
Cloudy.70's
INVESTIGATORS NAMES: Sue White
DATE COMPLAINT RECEIVED: 8/14/2017
DATE COMPLAINT INSPECTED: 8/15/17

Wehner, Jud
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Monday, August 21, 2017 9A1 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy, Cole, Brad; Vinson, Toby
Cr.
Davis, Tracy
Subject:
RE: Blasting Complaint - Martin Marietta Haw River, Alamance County
She has it and will fill it out. I'll have to look for Bamboo Road. Tim is off today but he and I will discuss.
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 9:34 AM
To: Gantt, Matt <[e-mail]>; Cole, Brad <[e-mail]>; Vinson, Toby
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Blasting Complaint - Martin Marietta Haw River, Alamance County
Did Sue fill out a blasting complaint form for this one? Also does anyone have the blasting complaint form for the
Bamboo Road Quarry?
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 9:02 AM
To: Cole, Brad <brad.colePncdenr.aov>; Vinson, Toby <tobv.vinson(5)ntdenceov>
Cc: Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>; Wehner, Judy <iudv.wehnercancdenceov>
Subject: FW: Blasting Complaint - Martin Marietta Haw River, Alamance County
Brad and Toby,
Sue visited the complaint on Tuesday, August 15. No firm evidence of a fly rock incident could be verified. She is going
back to the site tomorrow to meet with the person that claimed fly rock landed on his roof. We will follow up with a
final report after her visit tomorrow.
Thanks,
Matt
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Monday, August 14, 20171:10 PM
To:'Cole, Brad (bra d.coleldncdenreov)l <brad.colerancdenr.eov>; 'Vinson, Toby (tobv.vinsonPncdenr.eovl'
<tobv.vinson(R ncdenr eov>
Cc: White, Sue <sue.whiterancdenr.gov>; Wehner, Judy <iudv.wehner(dncdenr eov>;'Davis, Tracy
(tracv.davisrancdenr govl' <tracv.davis(ancdenr eov>
Subject: Blasting Complaint - Martin Marietta Haw River, Alamance County
Brad and Toby,
We just had a blasting complaint regarding the Haw River Quarry in Alamance County. Sue White will schedule an
inspection of the Impacted areas for tomorrow.
Thanks,

Matt • •
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336.776-9654 mobile/direct
Matt. aanttpncden r.00v
450 West Hanes MITI Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
IC�NOtmvCompares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Wehner, Judy
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Monday, August 14, 20171:11 PM
To:
Cole, Brad; Vinson, Toby
Cc:
White, Sue; Wehner, Judy; Davis, Tracy
Subject
Blasting Complaint - Martin Marietta Haw River, Alamance County
Brad and Toby,
We just had a blasting complaint regarding the Haw River Quarry in Alamance County. Sue White will schedule an
Inspection of the Impacted areas for tomorrow.
Thanks,
Matt
Matthew E. Caatt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9654 mobileldirect
[e-mail]
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite $00
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
�-"Nothing Compares-..
Email comespOndence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

• 0

NC
Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENOMNMENTALOUALM
•
August 29, 2017
Mr. Mike Allen
Martin Marietta Aggregates
PO Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
RE: Blasting Complaint
East Alamance Quarry
Permit No. 01-08
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Allen:
• PER OROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
samhuy
TRACY DAVIS
ObMRr
This office recently received a complaint directed at blasting practices conducted at the
above referenced quarry.
As provided in the mining permit for this site, you are requested to provide this office
duplicate copies of all shot records related to the blasts conducted on August 11, 2017,
including any seismograph recordings made. Furthermore, please forward all shot information
for one production shoot conducted immediately before and one production shot after the
blast in question for this offiice's review.
I look forward to receiving the requested information in the near future. Your continued
cooperation will be appreciated.
=incerely,
Judith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt'. PE
Sole o7 north M" I ENN McNM Q, fty I Fn ,Wb and dvvamvices
M2K SalisburyE 1116E MWI Se Cm IRaWrA hf UC ObaP M12
919707 WOO

0 0

Boyer, Janet
From: -
Boyer, Janet
Sent:
Tuesday, May 09, 2017 9:54 AM
To:
'Jay Nivens'
Cc:
Gantt, Matt DO
Subject:
RE: Martin Marietta East Alamance Mine Permit 01-18 Modification
Attachments:
01-08 MOD 2017.pdf 111
Jay,
The permit modification was issued on May 2, 2017 (please see attached(. Please notify Matt Gantt at the Winston-
Salem Regional Ot6ce prior to beginning construction on the retaining wall, he has further questions regarding erosion
and sediment control measures to be used during construction.
Janet
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 office
Janet, bover(olncdencaov
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
/'Nothing Compares.....
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Jay Nivens [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2027 8:41 AM
To: Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>
Subject: Martin Marietta East Alamance Mine Permit 01-18 Modification
Good Morning Janet,
Can you give me an update on where we stand on the approval forthis modification?
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer

Maetiri Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www, martinmarietta.com

Boyer, Janet ql - D b
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 7:48 AM
To: Boyer, Janet
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quarry
Can we meet briefly at 10:30 am today in your office so I can look at the map? -
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
0191707-9200 office
tracv.davisrdncr enr.eov
512 N. Salisbury Street — Archdale Buildine
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to theNorth Carolina Public Records Low and
may be disclosed to third parties.
Sent from my !Phone
On Mar 14, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Boyer, Janet <ianet.boverCDncdenr.gov> wrote
Jay,
We will be happy to review this proposal if you would like to submit it. However, we will still need a
clear justification for why it is necessary to disturb the buffer. It seems from looking at the plans that
there may be room to alter the footprint and shift the basin so that it will be outside the buffer. Any
encroachment into the 50-foot buffer will need to be backed up by information showing why there is no
other option.
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 office
Janet.boverf2mcdenr coy
512 N. Salisbury Street — Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
<image003.png>
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Jay Nivens [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 3:15 PM
To: Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quarry
Janet,
Thanks for following up with the concerns we have with this project.
As we talked on the phone on the 61', we feel we have met the intent of the riparian buffer rules by
allowing grading within the upper 20' zone of the stream buffer as allowed. You indicated you would
need justification, per the Mine Act, on the proposed encroachment into the stream buffer. As we
discussed, the situation we have on this site and we feel we have mitigated the impact to the buffer by
providing a treatment device with a higher rate of treatment and by using retaining walls in the design
of the pond to further decrease the footprint. I have attached a copy of the detailed plan and a copy of
the Stream Buffer Encroachment Detail that has been previously submitted to help clearly show this
area and the design of the pond.
However with the respect of time, we are willing to re-establish the 20' encroachment area caused by
the basin. We are proposing to follow the USDA-NRCS guidelines on plantings for riparian
restoration (attached) by planting willows in the encroachment area. These plantings will be planted
throughout the encroachment zone at spacing intervals of 8' on center, as specified in the
guidelines. This will equate to approximately 175 plants to be planted. .I have revised the Stream Buffer
Encroachment Detail to indicate this intent.
If this proposal will meet NCDEQ's requirement to re-establish the buffer we will be glad to resubmit the
attached information for approval. If you have concerns please let me know and I will try to address
them prior to resubmittal to prevent an additional review cycle.
Thanks for your help in getting this project approved.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Davis, Tracy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:33 AM
To: Jay Nivens <Ja .Nivens martinmarietta.com>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>; Vinson, Toby <toby.vinson@ncdenr,gov>
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quarry

EXTERNAL MAIL
Thanks for the message. I asked Janet on February 24 to contact you to discuss your proposal further
and to obtain further information/justification. I am checking with Janet now for an update. One of us
will be in touch with you soon.
My apologies,
Tracy
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] office
tracy.davis@ ncdenr.gov
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to theNorth Carolina Public
Records taw and may be disclosed to third parties.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Jay Nivens<Jay_Nivens(@martinmarietta.com> wrote:
Good Morning Tracy,
I wanted to follow up with you on the information contained in the correspondence
below concerning the modification for the mine permit for our East Alamance Quarry.
Can you provide an update on where we stand on this request for approval?
Thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Martin Marietta
On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]> wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL
I will look into this and get back to you shortly.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Jay Nivens [mailto:Ja .Nivens martinmarietta.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:26 AM
To: Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>
3

Cc: Brian North <briars.northCeDmartinmarietta.co_m>
Subject: FW: East Alamance Quarry
Good Morning Mr, Davis,
Judy asked that I speak with you concerning the modification/approval
of this mine permit.
We are in the process of modifying our mining permit for our East
Alamance Quarry located in Alamance County. This modification
request was made to request a 20' encroachment into the 50' stream
buffer. This encroachment provides for the construction of the
embankment/dam section of a stormwater treatment pond for a new
lease are we are providing a customer.
Central Office has determined, after previous reviews, we will now be
required to provide a plan to re-establish the buffer disturbance prior to
approval of the permit. The construction of this pond, including the
embankment/dam section within the 20' encroachment, will follow the
DEQapproved planting and stabilization standards as specified on the
mine plan.
This mine site is located within the Neuse River Basin. The Neuse River
Basin riparian buffer rules requires a 50' buffer along any intermittent
or perennial stream within the basin. This buffer is split into 2
categories: Zone 1 which extends 30' from the stream and Zone 2 which
extends the remaining 20'. Zone 1 is to remain undisturbed except for
certain uses and Zone 2 "which shall consist of a stable, vegetated area
that is undisturbed except for approved uses and activities".
The original design of this pond and the embankment/dam was
designed so that we stay in compliance with this ordinance. The
embankment/dam section of this pond will be located within the 20'
Zone 2 of this buffer. The maintenance activities for this dam to
prevent the growth of vegetation which will be a structural detriment to
this dam, as directed by NCDEQ and the Mine Safety Health
Administration (MSHA), are exempt from the "undisturbed"
requirements for Zone 2. (per the table of uses in the ordinance) Our
dam maintenance activities are to mow the dams we have on our sites
twice a year to comply with these requirements and prevent the growth
of trees on the dams.
I request this permit be approved as all outstanding issues have been
addressed and given the facts that based on the Neuse Buffer Rules and
the planting restrictions for pond embankments/dams we are in
compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances.
I am sure Judy can provide any details and information previously
submitted to NCDEQ.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any
further information. I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:30 AM
To: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL
You need to discuss with Janet and/or Tracy.
From: Jay Nivens[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4.57 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quary
Judy,
We will be glad to replant the encroachment area. I wish this request
could have been made several months ago.
Since this is a request coming from Central Office in your letter please
provide the ordinance requiring the buffer to be replanted'and the
appropriate planting standard including the specifics of spacing and
plants to be used.
We want to be sure we provide the necessary level of detail on the
resubmitted plans.
Thanks,
Jay
On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:13 PM, Wehner, Judy <iudy.wehner@ncdenr.g_ov>
wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL
Janet just informed me that I need to send another
letter stating that the 50 foot buffer has to be re-
established. She will not approve the enctoachment.
5

From: Jay Nivens
[mailto:Jay.N ivens@ma rtinmarietta.comj
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:58 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>; Boyer,
Janet <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary - T
Judy,
The buffer encroachment has been requested to
construct a treatment pond within the stream buffer on
a lease area we are providing to a customer.
Please see the information below provide to DEQ
explaining the request:
• The pre -submittal information provided to Matt
Gantt to discuss this modification in an email on
9/27/16 (see attached) indicates the proposed
construction of a treatment pond within the
stream buffer. This information was forwarded
from Matt to your attention indicating a
modification was needed.
• The original modification letter dated October
11, 2016 listed "The proposed impacts to the
previously approved 50' stream buffer for the
new lease area. This encroachment will
encroach into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer
approximately 20' leaving a 30' undisturbed
buffer. This encroachment will run for
approximately 350' along the stream
channel." The plans clearly show and label a
treatment pond being proposed in this area.
• In your letter dated November 6, 2016 you
requested additional information on the
proposed treatment pond in this location. (See
Item #i5) The re -submitted information
provided a full engineering plan for this
treatment pond showing the construction of
the pond within the buffer, as requested.
I hope this provides you the necessary information. If I
can be of any further assistance please let me know.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
6

8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:26 PM
To: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fast Alamance Quary�
Why are your requesting to encroach on the stream
buffer? I need a description of why you want to
encroach on the buffer. That is what we mean by
providing a description of the modification request. it
appears to be expansion of the processing
area. Asohalt plant? Stockpiles? Washing facility? I
need this information to describe the modification
within the permit.
When a modification request is submitted we need a
detailed description of the request.
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
919-707-9227 office
Judy.WehnerCcDncdenr.gov Email
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Norty Carolina 27699-1512
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
<image001.png>
Email correspondence to and from this address is
subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be
subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

ROY COOPER
Energy, Minerare
Land Resources
ENvAK)WENTELWAM"
December 1, 2017
Jahn J Tiber!
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P 0 Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622.0013
RE: Mining Permit -No. 01-08
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Dear John J Tiben:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
s rtw
TRACY DAVIS
omarur
This letter is to advise you of recent amendments to the North Carolina Mining Act of 1971 which impact the
permit term of your existing mining permit. Pursuant to the passage of House Bill 56, which became law on October 4,
2017 as She 2017-209, all existing mining permits and any newly issued mining permits are to be issued for the life of she
or for the duration of the lease term. The "Ilfe of site" means the period from the initial receipt of a permit for the operation
until the mining operation terminates and the required reclamation is completed.
Considering the above, this letter hereby modifies your existing mining permit to remove all references to the prior
expiration date to convert your permit to a life of site or lease permit effective immediately. No action is required on your
pad for this modification to be effective. Please attach this letter to your existing mining permit for future reference. The
mine name and permit number on the permit document, and all existing operating and reclamation conditions contained
therein; shall remain in full force and effect. Furthermore, all provisions of GS §74-51 and GS §74-52 still apply to all new,
transferred and modified mining permits.
In addition to the life of site or lease mining permit provision, SL 2017-209 also enacted a new annual mining
permit operating fee of $400 per mining permit number. By statute; the initial payment of this annual $400 fee must be
submitted to this office by December 31, 2017 — see the attached Invoice to remit the Initial annual fee payment by this
deadline. Beginning In 2018, the $400 annual operating fee must be submitted by July 1 of each year with the required
Annual Reclamation Report as required by GS §74-55. Failure to submit the fee by the required deadline will result in a
$50/month late fee and could result in the denial of future permit actions and/or revocation of your mining permit.
Lastly, pursuant to GS §74-54, the cap on reclamation bonds has been raised from $500,000 to $1 million. Any
adjustments needed in existing bonds will be initiated by this office or addressed during your next requested permit action
unless you contact this office with a written request to have your bond reevaluated.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local zoning regulations. The
responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations remains with you.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions on the above, please contact Ms. Judy
Warner, Assistant State Mining Specialist, or me at [phone]. .
Sincerely, I/
William "Toby Vinson, Jr., PE, CPM
Interim Director, DEMLR
Stale or North Carollna IEnvimnmrntal gassy FnLTgy. Mncraland lmEResourtea
512N.Millaua S,eet I1613M1W Scrvlu C<n[erI "Llgh Noah Carolina 11899-%12
91970T9200

N
Energy, Mlneral a
Land Resources
GNVI. WENTALMAU.
May 2, 2017
Mr. John J. Tiberi
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
2710 Wycliff Raid
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Permit No. 01-08
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Tiberi:
ROY COOPER
aoVernw
MICHAEL S. REGAN
SKMWry
TRACY DAVIS
Ur"W
Your recent request to have the above referenced mining permit modified has been
approved. The modification is to decrease the permitted acreage to 600.2 acres and the
affected acreage at this site to 372.7 acres as indicated on the Mine Plan received on March
29, 2017. The modification includes overall updating of the site conditions on the mine map,
construction of a new tenant area (asphalt plant), removal of a portion of berm construction
along the southwestern permitted area, redesign of Culverts A and B and allows the use of rip
rap baffles with stipulations. The modification also includes the installation and maintenance
of all associated erosion and sediment control measures. A copy of the modified permit is
enclosed.
The conditions in the modified permit were based primarily upon the initial application.
Modifications were made as indicated by the modification request and as required to insure
compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. The expiration date, mine name and permit number
shall remain the same as before the modification. I would like to draw your particular attention
to the following conditions where minor additions or changes were made: Operating Condition
Nos. 3C, 4E, 10B and 12E.
The issuance of a mining permit and/or any modification to it does not supersede local
` zoning regulations. The responsibility of compliance with any applicable zoning regulations
lies with you.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 600.2 acres and the amount of
land you are approved to disturb is 372.7 acres.
Please note that Mining Permit No. 01-08 expires April 22, 2018. In order to continue
mining operations at this site after April 22, 2019, a renewal request must be submitted prior to
said date.
50e ofNmah UmlW I Vv rncmal QuAlyI erBB M'mc,al vnd Landr¢stu,ces
9E N. SaIBbury Stnet 1611 MaII5erv97GMtt WIeIBh.Nwlh CaMMa i199IbQ
919 ]Q]9200

Mr. Tiberi
Page Two
Please review the modified permit and contact Judy Wehner, Assistant Mining
Specialist, at [phone] should you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely, Is, '
\
p�
J ne S. Boyer, P
S to Mining Specialist
JSBfjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Mr. William Gerringer-Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERALS AND LAND
RESOURCES
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County - Permit No. 01-08
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone {quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: August 22, 2018

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environmental Quality hereinafter referred to as the Department, and in
conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of this
permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized bylaw.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
August 8, 1988: This permit has been modified to include the construction of access/haul
roads to the monitoring wells and the Magazine and the construction of Berm B as indicated
on Sheets 1 and 3 dated June 30, 1988 and Sheets 2 and 4 dated July 29, 1988 of the revised
map.
September 30, 1988: This permit has been modified to include the construction of a second
entrance to Highway 49 and a new berm (Berm P) as indicated on the revised Erosion Control
Plan dated September 12, 1988.

Page 3
March 6, 1990: This permit has been modified to include the development of the Related Use
Area, the extension of Berm D along the southern property line, and the designation of the
new haul road immediately west of the quarry area denoted in the modification request and
revised Erosion Control Plan dated January 24 and January 15, 1990, respectively.
June 21, 1991: This permit has been modified to include site grading and erosion control
measures relating to the Berm F extension and the Stripping Extension 1991 as specified by
the revised Erosion Control Plan dated April 16, 1991.
November 25 1992: This permit has been modified to allow the installation of an additional
creels crossing near the existing quarry area and the associated sediment and erosion control
measures as indicated on the Erosion Control Plan dated September 30, 1992, the Storm
Drainage Improvements Plan dated June 4, 1992, and the Erosion Control Details dated June
4, 1992.
April 13, 1993: This permit has been modified to allow the substitution of three 96 inch
aluminized steel type 2 pipes in lieu of the previously approved two 120 inch concrete lined
corrugated metal pipes in Boyd's Creek as indicated on the Alternate Design Plan revised
February 12, 1993.
November 22, 1996: This permit has been modified to allow the expansion of Berm F and
associated sedimentation and erosion control measures as indicated on the Mine Map dated
July 27, 1996.
January 27, 1998: This permit has been modified to increase the affected area by 15.3 acres
of overburden removal area and associated erosion and sedimentation control measures, as
indicated on the mine map last revised September 2, 1997.
February 27, 1998. This permit has been modified to allow the pit expansion, the creek
relocation, and additional overburden storage, along with each activity's associated erosion
and sedimentation control measures, as indicated on the mine map last revised December 8,
1997. The creek relocation and its associated erosion and sedimentation has been approved
with certain stipulations.
June 4, 1998: This permit has been modified to allow on site generated waste material to be
placed in Berm F as indicated on the Mine Map received on April 16, 1998.
May 1, 2002: This permit has been modified to add 6.8 acres to the affected acreage at this
site to allow the construction of an asphalt plant, a slight revision to the approved pit limits, the
relocation of a monitoring well, and the installation and maintenance of the associated
sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on the 2002 Permit Modification Mine
Map last revised April 24, 2002 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant dated March 7, 2002. This modification also includes an adjustment to the
affected acreage at this site in light of more accurate mapping techniques.
July 8, 2002: This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation, has been transferred in its
entirety to Martin Marietta Aggregates.

Page 4
December 22 2004: This permit has been modified to incorporate the Haw River Quarry
(Mining Permit No. 01-09) into the East Alamance Quarry permit, and to add an additional
85.5 acres to the permit boundary, as indicated on the Mine Map last revised November 12,
2004. The modification is to increase the permitted acreage to 610.61 acres and the affected
acreage at this site to 380.67 acres. The modification includes the addition of 310,61
permitted acres and the addition of 188.37 affected acres.
August 22, 2008: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at this site
to 411.40 acres as indicated on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008. This modification
includes the addition of overburden disposal area and processing area/hauls roads and the
installation and maintenance of all associated erosion and sedimentation control measures. In
addition, the modification includes the necessary approval from the Division of Water Quality
relating to the stream relocation and stream channel impacts.
July 15, 2013: This permit has been modified to change the corporate name from
Martin Marietta Aggregates to Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
May 2, 2017: This permit has been modified to decrease the permitted acreage to 600.2
acres and the affected acreage at this site to 372.7 acres as indicated on the Mine Plan
received on March 29, 2017. The modification includes overall updating of the site conditions
on the mine map, construction of a new tenant area (asphalt plant), removal of a portion of
berm construction along the southwestern permitted area, redesign of Culverts A and B and
allows the use of rip rap baffles with stipulations. The modification also includes the
installation and maintenance of all associated erosion and sediment control measures.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until August 22, 2018.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
Wastewater and Quarry Dewaterin
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.

Page 5
B. Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary storm'water permits or
other approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of
Air Quality.
B. All permanent access roads (plant entrances) pavement shall be maintained
from. the junctions with Sandy Cross Road (SR 1752) and NC Highway 49 for the
distances indicated in the last revised mine maps. During processing operation,
water trucks or other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent
dust from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that waterway or
wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse or wetland.
C. All buffer zones shown on the Mine Map received March 29, 2017 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and approved earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. Energy dissipators shall be provided at all pipe outlets. All energy dissipaters
installed after December 22, 2004, shall be constructed, at a minimum, of Class
B stone at a 22-inch thickness, 12 feet long, and as per the detail submitted in
the modification application received on August 6, 2004.

Page 6
C. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine
Map last revised November 12, 2004.
D. All mining activities, including those associated with the additional overburden
disposal area, processing area/haul road and stream relocation of the unnamed
tributary to Boyd's Creek, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine Map last
revised July 2, 2008 and the supplemental information received on March 20,
2008 and July 7, 2008, with the exception that temporary sediment control
measures be utilized just below the downstream end of proposed culverts No.
105 and No. 106 during the installation of the culverts; that silt bags or a stilling
basin be utilized for any discharge of water that may have to be pumped from
the actual construction area of the Boyd's Creek Road Crossing; and if
necessary, an impervious dike be utilized on the upstream side of the Boyd's
Creek culvert installation area to impound water for the pumping operation.
E. Mining activities associated with the overall updating of the site conditions on the
mine map, construction of a new tenant area (asphalt plant), removal of a portion
of berm construction along the southwestern permitted area, redesign of Culverts
A and B and allows the use of rip rap baffles with the stipulation that the baffles
shall be replaced every six months and basins shall be enlarged to compensate
V the rip rap baffle volume including the installation and maintenance of all
associated erosion and sediment control measures, shall occur as indicate on
the Mine Plan received on March 29, 2017 and supplemental information
received October 14, 2016, December 7, 2016, January 24, 2017 and March 29,
2917,
F. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not
limited to, expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden or waste disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008, shall
be monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of consolidated
material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the determination of pre-existing
(static) groundwater levels.

Page 7
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock and
grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into unweathered rock, whichever is
deeper. The wells shall be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits or approvals to construct these wells shall be
obtained from the Division of Water Quality.
C. The observation wells shall be monitored quarterly at the same day and
approximate time of day. The static water levels shall be measured with an
accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum point and
a record of the water levels maintained. The quarterly precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these records
shall be provlded to the Department on or about the end of each quarter. Static
water level monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which
can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels,
the erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient
to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the quarry opening shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized within 80
days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum ten (10) foot wide horizontal safety
bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of any overburden'
slope.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
8. Blastin
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance
no farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or
leased by the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air
overpressure, and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as
provided under Operating Condition Nos. 8B and 8D of this permit). The following
blasting conditions shall be observed by the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons
and adjacent property from surface blasting:

Page 8
A. Ground Vibration With Monitoring:
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling
house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.
Blast Ybratton Frequency, Hs
Figure 1 Alternative'blasSng level criteria. -
(Scurce modified from, fguie S-L- Bureau of Mines RI a50T)
B. Ground Vibration Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
W = (D/Da)z Ds = D
Wtn
V=180(Da)-1 e
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).

Page 9
Ds = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per
second, for the purposes of this Section.
C. Air blast With Monitoring:
Air blast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129
decibels linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted
area such as a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or
institutional building, unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the
seismograph microphone as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measuring System, in Hz in dBL
0.1 Hz or lower -flat response 134 peak
2.0 Hz or lower -flat response 133 peak
6.0 Hz or lower -flat response 129 peak
D. Air blast Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
U = 82 (D%W0'33)-1.2
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x104)
Confined Air blast/Overpressure (dBL)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Air blast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).

Page 10
The air blast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section.
E. Record Keeping:
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing: the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to
closest offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of
the blast. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies
shall be provided to the Department upon request.
F. Excessive Ground Vibration/Air blast Reporting:
If ground vibration or Air blast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken, However, blasting
may occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization
to blast at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the
high ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal
approval. Failure to report will constitute a permit violation.
G. flyrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and
repeated instances of flyrock shalt be considered a violation of the Mining Permit,
H. Flyrock Reporting:
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on
the mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing the investigation shall be provided to the Department
within 10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions
that will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with
the approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine
site.

Page 11
Studies:
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a
level allowed by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
J. Notice:
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24-hour advance
notice to the Winston Salem Regional Regional Office prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or 48-inch fencing with
two strands of barbed wire (total 60 inches overall height) shall be maintained at all
times along the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. In
addition, a minimum 10 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the
junction between the top of rock and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening
methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Plan received March 29, 2017. In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or
Virginia pines or other acceptable evergreen species shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
C. The Previously Approved Overburden Disposal Area and Future Berm areas
shall be constructed and stabilized as indicated on the Mine Map last revised
November 12, 2004.
11. Plan Modification
A. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any
approved revisions to it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.

Page 12
B. A modification request shall be submitted to and approved by the Department
prior to commencement of any mining related activities on the 33.82-acre tract as
depicted on the Mine Map last revised November 12, 2904. As part of said
request, the permittee shall provide proper notification to all adjoining
landowners and the chief administrative officer(s) of the local government(s) of
its intentions to affect any areas in said tract.
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources, Department of Environmental Quality. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources considers the following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to
those specifically listed under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5. steel reinforced air hoses
5. drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources prior to commencement of such
disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2.. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established

Page 13
E. Used, clean concrete shall only be allowed on permitted quarry sites that have
obtained a valid air permit and are allowed to operate crushing operations for the
purposes of recycling and reuse provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Appropriate quality control measures shall be taken when the used
concrete arrives onsite to ensure that all such concrete processed onsite
is clean, inert material.
2. Used, clean concrete shall be temporarily stockpiled and processed within
existing approved affected areas draining to existing approved erosion
and sedimentation control measures.
3. No used, clean concrete material shall be permanently disposed of onsite.
4. Any foreign material that may be found within the used concrete must be
separated from the concrete and properly recycled or disposed off -site.
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
14. Bonding
The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$500,000.00 blanket bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 14
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S,_74-53
1. The final slopes in, all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any high wall, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:

Page 15
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12A.
through 12D.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Reveoetation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
on the Details Sheet last revised July 2, 2008 and approved by Mr. Nuwan Wijesudya of
Martin Marietta Materials on March 19, 2008.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.

Page 16
This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation March 4, 1988, modified August 8, 1988,
September 30, 1988, March 6, 1990, June 21, 1991, November 25, 1992, April 13,
1993, November 22, 1995, and January 27, 1998, modified and renewed February 27,
1998, modified June 4, 1998 and May 1, 2002, transferred in its entirety to Martin
Marietta Aggregates July 8, 2002 modified December 22, 2004 renewed and modified
August 22, 2008 and modified July 15, 2D13 is hereby modified this 2nd day of May,
2017 pursuant to G.S. 74-52.
n��
Tracy E Davis, Director
Division f prgy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environmental Quality

THIS PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES LINES APPURTENANCES,
ETC., AND THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES VALVES, ETC. AS
SHOWN ARE /N AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT
LOCATION OF ALL DUSTING UTILITIES LINES PIPES, ETC. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND I I
AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE
CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND
ANY CS PIPES AND VALVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF
ANY
CONFLICTS WON EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITIES TO DETERMINE IF AN REM WILL
NEW TO BE RELOCATED. � 1
THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HAS MADE NO EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY HAURDOUS OR
TOXIC MATERIALS ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINEU IN, UNDER. OR ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ITS \�
WATERS, OR IF ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS OR OTHER
PROPERTIES OR US WATERS IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. NO SUB —SURFACE EXAMINATION OF ANY TYPE
HAS BEEN MADE BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT, AND ACCORDINGLY, NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR
INFERRED ON ALL SUCH MATTERS. FURTHER, NO OPINION /S RENDERED AS TO ANY WOLATION OF 111 ANY ENNRONMENTAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS EITHER FEDER.LL., STATE, OR LOCAL RELATED TO THE
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT IS IN NO WAY L14UXE FOR ANY
VIOLATION OF SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SHOULD SUCH DUST. l
TOP-584.00 8' W E I �111 1
TOE-581.00 12" T CK
RIP —RA \\rkv' S \
PAD \\\ 1
ZONE 1 STREAM FFER INV. 56�\
(NO DISTURBANCE LLOWED I I
IN ZONE 1 - 30" a ROM
TOP OF STREAM B NK) Ia
TOP-585.00
TOE-584.00
104 LF OF
24" RCP ® 0.5%
W-58750
TOE-565.00
8FL BFL
IN
8'PVC
UNDERDRAIN
(3) OBSERVATION
WELL—TYP
N
RETAING WALL 11
240+/— F
DESIGN
OTHERS B (l
TOP-581.00
TOE-580.50�
SILT FENCEI
I
OUTLET ( )
r
E
V
Il;'I
I II
ZONE2
STREAM UFFER 1A
(50' FR M TOP
OF STR M BAND I Nk /1 /hill I I I
1 �l
l I Ill (I � rill I l l
� llll/j I 11(I II11�11 I I.
10 YR
F ODD PLAT / IIII 'IIII I I I I I II I I I
BFL
/I Lz
I,
r6 NC
UNDERDRrIN
P RIP
REB. Y
�1
146 F pF
18" �P \
@�fJ, /
I I s1
�/NV-595,06 1
4 LLL IIII
INV.
\
•��,FCIVEa
,�AR292011
598.00
.•�� //
DIVERSION
BERM (Tr
5w 7 / / n
It
I
40
Vfl-MOSAY
cwusLD owr
I� / STOEKPILE AREA 1
WNYL
p (� BLDG / l
CONC.
» c, eaRRiFl cow. 1
XOC a<oev III
C
/ ONC
ERI I I \
INV.— 00 4 °�v - (4)1 '-0 BOL�ARos / I
I I Sp`, I
rl AE Amwf'mwo�z Ed
doOf,�7
Lll��
us•s�ij I r r ] -
In
OR SPRK,
i
Lp•�
uNow
.:I • •r •-I���111R
11
OWL
•• III •rMr•r• LJ� r��•r .]�Ell
��� • k
•r •.•r•rT� IIVI }���r�• 1
• lv II •r•r�•'rm �,I��yy..�• _•.. � I
Lo '. • e. . ��.'i"� i t
,►fir t► :�i � ¢• ,r �ri i�
'A
•
�u
• u • • ►r• r=
•
o.l.r.:: a ..i
prp
- W.SPRK" SCALE., I Jot
Of
..�: 1-ki
Aw
• • • r. s url J, I
Ar 11Iov
� .,.••�•r•�•...• �► •,IP
Tw-
19
7RK•.., �
.•r�.
.1
Vfl PROPOSED ASPHALT PLANT
■ C RILEY
I11
EAST ALAMANCE QUARRY
i RC
@ .59\ GREEN LEVEL TOWNSHIP — HAW RIVER. ALAAAANCE, NC
6 WIDE
NZ: alley, williams, carmen & ldng, inc.
�A Rot, t-1 LOCATE 740 chapel hill mad P.O. box 117 ,
,I. COULD I •C ENGINEERS,.1'�' SURVEYORS
•
J
REVISIONSREV. 3124117 — SAND FILTER GRADING GRADING
�24 LF OF 1818" RCPI I
8.07I IIIll
I � is'q� IIII
4EMERWASPILL�'CY�I
a
54 LF OF
18"I RCP @
2. 1 c

} �I
I
ti
IEjI
III IHI
^
F
II1- IIEll
ZO
w
ti II�FI III II
o
N
III I� IF�IHII I
- a
o
� IF�I II Ik�IC Ik�II
I I I I
_
w
°0
I-IFIll-II
HI II I
IIE
L. PE
"€9
J o
N`�IIC
I�III
III I EllEN
90�8
LI2w
og'=o
III
o
b
III ME
E al
o"g�
III�II
I MI
aB � e
3Pu'
�/611�Ik�I
� rg
'O
I
3aaE
gd'v�8
semeJe
L .+rvmP
a.
CIO
vl y, U
I••Cy
Lo
ow
0
O� 10P.
Fo
a
/�4�w
✓ .. oe40
IZI
yG
Kaam
n�
F
fs
E
ac
4
H
eu3
HD
�
V)
W
u`
c
¢
E
2
[
m
46
Z
N
W
O
ww
It
Imo-
`s
a3
H
w
am'
w
UN
i�
/
F
Otl
4
o
�
N
F
U;
¢
LL
Q
W
V)
¢
C9
J
J
¢
0
LL
W
_)
Q
W
2
V
u
a
rn
m
+
m
d
-
0
m}
h
h
h
y
Ea
>
� >
L
N
n
O
> U
U O
N
.E
or
d
m °
�
=
T
a
v
N =
a ,�,
d
n.
c c ._
�
E
S
N
V
o
E
V)
o
a o
o o
O1 a
+ d
N
">
°
Z
m
o f
o +L- c
na
E
Z
°L
L d
N L
O V
d
O
y
O
N
N
°_N
3 d
d-yNO
Y n
L
N
O
E
w "' E
t c
N O
O
_;o
n
d
t 00
0 mO
H
+ '0
L
K
p
N o
y
d V- a
c d
0
v
4-
c r
d
Q
p
o N° O
J °
w
H
� L
'-'
_E
W
d
°
v°i 1n m
L
v H
o-
i
-' N
n
In
,o vdi
O
O y
w
d
O
o
V)
`o
V
Z
7
f
f
L m
c
E
O
_
i
f
E
2,o
U
e�
v
w
v
va
a
a
a
N
°
h
Wd
X
a
d
o
d
v
O
d o
B
Y
N
pJlO
Y
O
JW
J
2
t
°
V)
c
c
i
c
i
N o a
a
o
E
Q
tD
t9
V{
O N
L
do o
do
o
d
o
o -O
c
O
a�
tt.N•
a
E
'-
.
N V d �
f
E
r L
3 t5.
N m
\
a
0
�m
Ojp
j1d
NNp&
o
OL
l'
�O.Qp
=Q❑
NNs � m
E c
O
o d O1
o
O j
O
p
LL o
nah�Q
Uh QQ
��Q
LL�4°�
Y W
A A
i�
>
�
U
V
P1
W
0
Q
U PLI
U
w
V
I'
C r1
L
�
7'
o
Ll
\
A
-
\
�
Q
/ O
No
I
U
as
try, 6k
0
O
,
p°660
, i
660
- --- - �L
m 'a33nfi .0of N
0
�d
'Q
� OI
m
w
Q
W
w
M
N
OD
th
N
r
0
O)
ON
I,
t,
N
O
W
Li-
Q
�
v
of
N
0
O
�
O
y
�d
oG¢
d
d
m
m
U{
¢
o
u
¢
W
F-
N
v
y
rn
o
w
V)
0
N
U
C
S
i3a
��
o`er
O
N
V
LU
J-3
Q
tj
0
N
0
0
�
e
O
'J
�
Q m
v
u
�
_� O
� \
7�
4a
O
F^+/1
syo
p'
R
1 Ell
U � was o
\ j
� W
a ' a o
�pw O w
z � �
\ it
v-
J
Cal,
Il 0
cz
ct
it
1
o
x '
\ way " r P
1. � fA � �A � � � \�1. � N •D � 10 � V
o U
F e id - - -
a \� y
aauazo
04
L)
r w� o as N _ o O5�1
\ J / 1 / >� \ (i I, \ bryo i r a B Z I I U .g• `° .� Q ; f ,�yt1
3•. Vj / °a
roll u
lzu
'� CO c v .. W I u \ .•ti
u a o ?�\ a eo u,
3 ,n r \
a o bpi' �., 0.�i (� O t -_ m_ --- - a oStiMb'
F c x 0 v)�
-- - ---
N y 1 �c bw S� _ d o o P e)o _ o
�a
o 1_-szs w v°
lP,a a o
\�
a3 °
\ 1a33ng,00I 616�-
\ \N.-N \\ \�
O .b
_ a
cn
JAM
w / ems` p oO
\ �, v
bD
5•-I \ tY H N y , \
FF�Iii/•111 _ _ _ `
N
J
V O04
G69
065 - ' I ✓ 1�'�;
V\ oBr.
bc
IL ra
Goss \ \ \�`\ \ vtiZI
Cd
aj
68S
_.
J . J rr�
0-1
�
N l
W
lit-d1,'�0 a u / 069
Go
"OilR11a VV x n
V
4 w o ? H / \ \ T " Z N �/ 1� @ e �' I I I \ _ v
/ l �' // n u i z O J/.�
`AYpAuull y u v I'm r` o H _
z ° Z c ¢
ram',
14 VY"tl� \� �pwo vx+ T¢
t 11N 4K` /
aeao �Eo m - sss ';o� v� �n �=�ti �� o 'P.
W K W 6 w Z c❑i vy N �
w
O
N� s3 O �����
Ov `t
_ pp
Lu
r W..
Q K 2J W W 00
r1 �7•-.II i0. Oe \ : .iIIY , i Fy iV w�1��
H \\y ZK wa❑ buG
i°ous �,• J l ��(/��%CN� W �
60 O�\ a� p
Zi
OS
/ "�
^ o z D
dU�tS_
M
Otj
LL w 6�
\H pC
O F- �\ I' �' �-. C ,� ��. \ �c V �� COI 03
H \` a w {`' i z - s)o ,d- I ({ l� %J 1` �.\\//I `��/ _i�� r-j,, �:...\ `r a1 �� vi- e s� 1�/-I V]
a z v l F J.
O O 1 t��� w
� Doi - — - --- --- a A �o
uw
CL
Nx
ge {noaaa rA
V W w Vf ut W 90 1 -1
rl
C3 0-1 �'�
yy W
O p
M
I I
V
u
tj
v
v
M
.d
w°
W
u
Pi
Q
O C
/w/
N 00 (�
w FG V
cN
L r `V N .� x
\.ai
^J lVi Q
V
N
N
w od
H
^
m
M N
a--'
pq
00
CO
q
°'
o o o ° v
'pro " `0
^� o a
.�
C
yy ca �V
a
0
A yy�
cn
Q w % M
O w O
COw Cn
U fA 5 Q'I fA
N
O U V
z...
N
�
OJ
O
m y
[O
OJ
M
N
w
d�
mYo
n
W
W
W
W
m
co
co
cd
❑
Fm
m
O
O
3 c
m
p J
a8m
oa
a
In
N
ro
N
a
a
N
m
O L
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
m=
Ol
N
pJ
N
Q
N
�
N
N
W
O
M
V
M
m
❑
m
5
�
^
LD
m
�
J
J
H
3 �
N ¢
ix Z Z H O
w
z F- Z w V) j F-
'n wQoww z wa
m G N N S ot = j LU
dOw V) 3 Ww
w0 V>
wQ CY Q U)
Lu <VI any
'nO{nW �!Z+
ZO Q HO
p3�v0 w Wv
oFwda�� V)
LL
ownw z iV)
W OC V) W V) aw p O V)
= n F- V) > W F- Z
~20 HQ Wp Z Zm
-' H V W Wll� W V) '-' W
F-0O Z°C Q I_ Q O'>p
Zw:E LU ,V)i w °_>
Fd '° H V W~= z V V7 O
Z p SwF ¢
Or-)wm�U' O ¢ pew
m J H O H z ~ W m
Z ~ V) W W 3 H p H W F=' Q
W V H Z Q Ljj U p J m W
OrLU bzW OQJapZ VW)��LZ
V) ZV)V)Zkb HwlyJ V) W N W Q N
OZ ZTQa' W O Nmm F=-\• ¢Zly m
� z p w j w a D~ Z r-, V) F_
Q ZOvujm>QWQwdywW
F Q Q a N w V p i_ p Z j W p
ZO°JOm Hw�Z LuIc OS Ow
O O V * > F- U V)
U mi .p
N
!/09
uo V \
I
cn
ti
x �
•> 0 [. _ A V1Q0 .p A
0 .yO4pFi� e I 1
w o
gam
0 O
y9 aJ
CN
60 -'su04 i 500
�vCIO, a 1
o. �� P, o d w�
a w �
-'A o v% �� boo 0 o .n z ° w I� N0.
U u V] Or O y
aaov G�
I u 48 w o a, t1 � o -c a t/ o -i I a oo yyo cC
L: o z N /eve-
V t� w
jjJ �4 O - -
ado a o `_
um I p
_ o
U
4 v -
ro
I i w w t ; - y OES Q
V ` a \ �' \ ti
u Op'O \ \ � 'd �
0
503
le-
U
r,
m`
Basin
Y C
Q
E`
O
m
rc"
F m m
K
n
n
O
rnu
o
�
a
rn
d y
OJ
m
N
�s
mY
m
❑
H
T Y�
m
335
o
n
ms
a�
0.
Y: %•
O
N
m
d✓
O L
O
O
m C
N
N
J
r0
N
N
(O
�
o
m
m m
� E
cp
•-
{°
i° >
W
rn
m
ma
M
�
0
d
S
2
N
#3 °o° .a v a � •_- � I �
I
J
v .x B � 1a33nfI ,SZ
c oss
pp o
U'H O I OzS
c � �
a°Q �
I
U
�
7=
Cd

Wehner, Judy
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent
Friday, May 05, 2017 9:25 AM
To:
Boyer, Janet; Wehner, Judy
Subject:.
RE: East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Hi Janet,
I just got in a new plan Wednesday 5/3 with a suspense date of 5/24. Was that a revision to the 4/21/plan?
Thanks,
Matt
From: Boyer, Janet
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 9:23 AM
To: Gantt, Matt <[e-mail]>; Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Matt,
The suspense date for these comments was April 21, 2017. The permit modification has been issued. I assumed that
you did not have a concern with a wall outside of the fifty foot buffer if you were not concerned about a wall inside the
buffer. Please ask lay Nivens to notify you when construction begins so that an Inspector can review the details of the
wall contruction.
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 once
Janet, boyerAncdenr.00v
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, INC 27699
Nothing Compares...,,. -
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <iudv.wehnerNlncdencgov>
Cc: Boyer, Janet <ianet.boverColncdenr.aov>
Subject: East Alamance Quarry (01-08)

Hi Judy,
I was reviewing the modification plan for the East Alamance Quarry (01-08) and have a couple of comments for you:
1. We need to know how the wall will be constructed. if it is cast in place concrete, they will probably disturb quite
a bit of area above the silt fence. In that case, the silt fence probably would not be sufficient. If they use a
segmented retaining wall, silt fence, with some stone outlets, would probably be fine.
2. In either case, I would like to stipulate that they use silt fence with steel posts no greater than 4 feet apart with
#57 stone backfill. Reason being that silt fence below retaining wall construction tends to get knocked over
quite a bit.
3. 1 also want to see a construction detail for the silt fence noted in item ##2 on the construction drawings for the
retaining wall.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
'hanks,
Matt
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9654 mobile/direct
Matt. gantt@acdenr. ov
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
t: 'Nothing Compares...-,._
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

i
MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Applicant's Nome: Y'tllAM ProjectNome: Y - .I�j%°l•�i'-CJ p/F(�/
Applic./Permit No:_DJ-Ob Coueq: a&lwP-C-i Dote��neia. v/VI
Rmieurer: /L Riixr Basin Name: eta( *Ali
❑ New ❑ Resomwl Modbfwatian (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside t e 'es) Transfer ❑ Release
❑ Partial Rehouse Additiawl im*mahon ❑ Fa Needed: F ❑ Fee Remoed s
route entire
Pyvll�)lvrl laYiv�... Regtettal Dffin(�eemplN mpeK mesh tk°LQ$Prdiwial O)fiee Mvmy Appliauao Reoiem
ChociAa"to me co"xdamd both the DAQmd OWN 'Mie6gApplirmien Re Forem the alarapyl and both co*wthe Regional
Engineer)
Date: Rowed 3 h@q I Rre'd
❑ Division of Water Resourtes Date: Routed Reed
❑ NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date: Routed Reed
❑ US Fish b Wildlife Service Daty Routed Reed
(only aewepplbai and madtfuatim rpueete that add Lsdw the")
Please route first) pales of the application and arty location maps
to:
❑
Division of Parks d Recreation
Date: Routed
Reed
❑
NCCmlogiwlSwvegSection
Date: Routed
Rer'd
❑
Division of Maine Fisheries
Dote: Rated
Rec'd
❑
Division of Sal b Water Conservation (plus LEA)
Date: Routed
Rec'd
(Only aeonapp,. and WAAfemimu mrame that ma Led
b the perout)
❑ Division of Archives & History Date: Routed Reed
Petemea appluew)
❑ Otha: Date: Round Rec'd
"Suspense Date for Comments: a ( 1 (m later than n days from roceipt)
❑ Pleaw twos the foRowmg;

Transmittal Letter
Martin Marietta
Martin 8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
MGrletta charlotte, INIC 28217
(P) 704-40e-1475 (F) 7o4-527-9283
To:
NCDEQ - Energy Mining Land Resources
512 N Salisbury Street - 5th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604-1170
Attention:
Jud Wehner
y
Re:
East Alamance Quarry Mine Permit
Modification
m
III®loll_'�,
Change•-.-�i
,,.. EUI
ix '. i c,!C: M .'I
'Drawing
u�' 1
MININGPR
For Approval■Resubmit copies for approval
For Your Use
Please let me know if you have any ons or need any further information.
m-� 21,
G

Martin •
Marietta
March 28, 2017
Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDEQ-Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
RE: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08
Mine Permit Modification Resubmittal
Dear Ms. Wehner:
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 ZOV
LANo QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
This letter is in response to the letter of additional information requested dated February 21,
2017. The following information has been included to address the items in this letter.
• The Asphalt site owners have redesigned the basin to place a retaining wall outside of
the 50' stream buffer. This effectively removes the previous grading which would have
encroached into the buffer. I have included 2 copies of the revised mine plan and 2
copies of the detailed engineering plans showing the revised basin.
k Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or [e-mail] should
you have any questions or need any additional information.
cere y,
Jay evens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
east alamance mine permit modification resubmittal coverletter 3-28-17.docx

•
Boyer, Janet
From:
Boyer, Janet
Sent:
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:05 AM
To:
'Jay Nivens'
Cc:
Brian North; Vinson, Toby (toby.vinson@ncdencgov); Davis, Tracy
([e-mail]); Gantt, Matt
Subject:
RE: East Alamance Quarry
Jay,
We will be happy to review this proposal if you would like to submit it. However, we will still need a clear justification
for why it is necessary to disturb the buffer. It seems from looking at the plans that there maybe room to alter the
footprint and shift the basin so that it will be outside the buffer. Any encroachment into the 50-foot buffer will need to
be backed up by information showing why there is no other option.
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 office
Janet. boyerancdenr.aov
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
. %'Nothing Compares.—...
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Jay Nivens [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 3:15 PM
To: Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quarry
Janet,
Thanks for following up with the concerns we have with this project.
As we talked on the phone on the 6", we feel we have met the intent of the riparian buffer rules by allowing grading
within the upper 20' zone of the stream buffer as allowed. You indicated you would need justification, per the Mine Act,
on the proposed encroachment into the stream buffer. As we discussed, the situation we have on this site and we feel
we have mitigated the Impact to the buffer by providing a treatment device with a higher rate of treatment and by using
retaining walls in the design of the pond to further decrease the footprint. I have attached a copy of the detailed plan
and a copy of the Stream Buffer Encroachment Detail that has been previously submitted. to help clearly show this area
and the design of the pond.

i
•
However with the respect of time, we are willing to re-establish the 20' encroachment area caused by the basin. We are
proposing to follow the USDA-NRCS guidelines on plantings for riparian restoration(attached) by planting willows in the
encroachment area. These plantings will be planted throughout the encroachment zone at spacing intervals of 8' on
center, as specified in the guidelines. This will equate to approximately 175 plants to be planted. I have revised the
Stream Suffer Encroachment Detail to indicate this intent.
If this proposal will meet NCDEQ's requirement to re-establish the buffer we will be glad to resubmit the attached
information for approval. If you have concerns please let me know and I will try to address them prior to resubmittal to
prevent an additional review cycle.
Thanks for your help in getting this project approved.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Davis, Tracy [mailto:trac .davis ncdenr. ov]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:33 AM
To: Jay Nivens <Jay.Nivens@martinmarietta; com>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>; Vinson, Toby <tob .vinson ncdenr. ov>
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quarry
EXTERNAL MAIL
Thanks for the message. I asked Janet on February 24 to contact you to discuss your proposal further and to obtain
further information/justification. I am checking with Janet now for an update. One of us will be in touch with you soon.
My apologies,
Tracy
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919 707-9200 office
[e-mail]
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

i
•
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to theNorth Carolino Public Records Lain► and
may be disclosed to third parties.
Sent from my Phone
On Mar 6, 2017, at 9:28 AM, lay Nivens <Ja .Nivens martinmarietta.com> wrote:
Good Morning Tracy,
I wanted to follow up with you on the information contained in the correspondence below concerning
the modification for the mine permit for our East Alamance Quarry.
Can you provide an update on where we stand on this request for approval?
Thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Martin Marietta
On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Davis, Tracy <tracy.davis ncdenr.eov> wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL
I will look into this and get back to you shortly.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Jay Nivens [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:26 AM
To: Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <brian.north [e-mail]>
Subject: FW: East Alamance Quarry
Good Morning Mr. Davis,
Judy asked that I speak with you concerning the modification/approval of this mine
permit.
We are in the process of modifying our mining permit for our East Alamance Quarry
located in Alamance County. This modification request was made to request a 20'
encroachment into the 50' stream buffer. This encroachment provides for the
construction of the embankment/dam section of a stormwater treatment pond for a
new lease are we are providing a customer.
Central Office has determined, after previous reviews, we will now be required to
provide a plan to re-establish the buffer disturbance prior to approval of the
permit. The construction of this pond, including the embankment/dam section within
the 20' encroachment, will follow the DEQ approved planting and stabilization standards
as specified on the mine plan.
This mine site is located within the Neuse River Basin. The Neuse River Basin riparian
buffer rules requires a 50' buffer along any intermittent or perennial stream within the

basin. This buffer is splilko 2 categories: Zone 1 which extends 30*m the stream
and Zone 2 which extends the remaining 20'. Zone 1 is to remain undisturbed except
for certain uses and Zone 2 "which shall consist of a stable, vegetated area that is
undisturbed except for approved uses and activities".
The original design of this pond and the embankment/dam was designed so that we stay
in compliance with this ordinance. The embankment/dam section of this pond will be
located within the 20' Zone 2 of this buffer. The maintenance activities for this dam to
prevent the growth of vegetation which will be a structural detriment to this dam, as
directed by NCDEQ and the Mine Safety Health Administration (MSHA), are exempt
from the "undisturbed" requirements for Zone 2. (per the table of uses in the
ordinance) Our dam maintenance activities are to mow the dams we have on our sites
twice a year to comply with these requirements and prevent the growth of trees on the
dams.
I request this permit be approved as all outstanding issues have been addressed and
given the facts that based on the Neuse Buffer Rules and the planting restrictions for
pond embankments/dams we are in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances.
I am sure Judy can provide any details and information previously submitted to NCDEQ.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any further
information. I look forward to hearing from you.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:30 AM
To: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL
You need to discuss with Janet and/or Tracy.
From. Jay Nivens[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4:57 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quary
Judy,

We will be glad to repla9he encroachment area. I wish this reque9ould have been
made several months ago.
Since this is a request coming from Central Office in your letter please provide the
ordinance requiring the buffer to be replanted and the appropriate planting standard
including the specifics of spacing and plants to be used.
We want to be sure we provide the necessary level of detail on the resubmitted plans.
Thanks,
Jay
On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:13 PM, Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]> wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL
Janet just informed me that I need to send another letter stating that
the 50 foot buffer has to be re-established. She will not approve the
enctoachment.
From: Jay Nivens[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:58 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>; Boyer, Janet
<ia net. bover@ ncdenr.sov>
Cc: Brian North<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary
J udy,
The buffer encroachment has been requested to construct a treatment
pond within the stream buffer on a lease area we are providing to a
customer.
Please see the information below provide to REQ explaining the
request:
• The pre -submittal information provided to Matt Gantt to
discuss this modification in an email on 9/27/16 (see attached)
indicates the proposed construction of a treatment pond within
the stream buffer. This information was forwarded from Matt
to your attention indicating a modification was needed.
• The original modification letter dated October 11, 2016 listed
"The proposed impacts to the previously approved 50' stream
buffer for the new lease area. This encroachment will encroach
into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer approximately 20' leaving a 30'
undisturbed buffer. This encroachment will run for
approximately 350' along the stream channel." The plans
clearly show and label a treatment pond being proposed in this
area.
• In your letter dated November 6, 2016 you requested additional
information on the proposed treatment pond in this location.

(See ItA5) The re -submitted information providla full
engineering plan for this treatment pond showing the
construction of the pond within the buffer, as requested.
I hope this provides you the necessary information. If I can be of any
further assistance please let me know.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:26 PM
To: Jay Nivens <Jay.Nivens@ma rtinmarietta.com>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL
Why are your requesting to encroach on the stream buffer? I need a
description of why you want to encroach on the buffer. That is what we
mean by providing a description of the modification request. It appears
to be expansion of the processing area. Asohalt
plant? Stockpiles? Washing facility? I need this information to describe
the modification within the permit.
When a modification request is submitted we need a detailed
description of the request.
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
919-707-9227 office
Jud .Wehner ncdenr. ov Email
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Norty Carolina 27699-1512
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
<image001.png>
6

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Boyer, Janet
To: Davis, Tracy, Wenner, Judy
Cc: Vinson, Toby, Gantt, Matt; Cole, Brad
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quarry
This area is covered by Sue Homewood. She reviewed the 404 and 401 permits that are valid until 12/31/17 and said
that they match the mine maps. She thought a buffer authorization may be necessary for a stormwater pond, but said
that he Jordan buffer rules exempt projects that received 401s prior to the rules implementation, so these impacts
would be grandfathered.
Cover letter for modification lists six bullets. The second bullet says, "The proposed impacts to the previously approved
50' stream buffer for the new lease area. This encroachment will encroach into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer
approximately 20' leaving a 30'undisturbed buffer. This encroachment will run for approximately 350' along the stream
channel." There is no further explanation or iustification for the stream buffer encroachment.
Sb. of the application for the modification states, "Existing streams within the permit boundary will have a 50"
undisturbed buffer."
On December 16, 2017, we received the following comment from Matt Gantt after he met with Jay Nivens
Hi Janet and Judy,
I have reviewed the revised modification submittal for the Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry (01-08) and have the
following comments:
1. Corrections to the plan have been made per my discussion with Jay Nivens on December 5, 2016, The only
remaining issue I see is the 20' encroachment into the buffer zone below the Treatment Pond. I'll let you make
the call on that one.
Thanks,
Matt
I questioned the justification for the encroachment. It was not made clear in the cover letter or application. Mr.
Nivens wrote to you before he discussed it with me. Additionally, I am confused about the Neuse River discussion in the
email below, as this quarry is in the Cape Fear River basin.
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 office
Ja net. boverCalncdenr.gov
512 N. Salisbury Street— Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

Wehner, Judy
From:
Boyer, Janet
Sent:
Friday, February 24, 201710:45 AM
To:
Davis, Tracy, Wehner, Judy
Cc:
Vinson, Toby, Gantt, Matt; Cole, Brad
Subject:
RE: East Alamance Quarry
I am confused about the Neuse River discussion In the email below, as this quarry is in the Cape Fear River
basin. Jennifer Burdette did not review this application. This area is covered by sue Homewood. Sue reviewed the 404
and 401 permits that are valid until 12/31/17 and said that they match the mine maps. She thought a buffer
authorization may be necessary for a stormwater pond, but said that he Jordan buffer rules exempt projects that
received 401s prior to the rules implementation, so these impacts would be grandfathered.
The cover letter for modification lists six bullets. The second bullet says, "The proposed impacts to the previously
approved Sly stream buffer for the new lease area. This encroachment will encroach into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer
approximately 20' leaving a 30'undisturbed buffer. This encroachment will run for approximately 350' along the stream
channel." There is no further explanation or justification for the stream buffer encroachment.
Ski. of the application for the modification states, "Existing streams within the permit boundary will have a 50'
undisturbed buffer."
On December 16, 2017, we received the following comment from Matt Gantt after he met with Jay Nivens
Hi Janet and Judy,
I have reviewed the revised modification submittal for the Martin Marietta East Alarrance Quarry (01-08) and have the
following comments:
1. Corrections to the plan have been made per my discussion with Jay Nivens on December 5, 2016. The only
remaining issue I see is the 21 encroachment into the buffer zone below the Treatment Pond. I'll let you make
the call on that one.
Thanks,
Matt
I questioned the justification for the encroachment. It was not made clear In the cover letter or application. It appears
that there is possibly room to push the basin slightly north and stay out of the 5d buffer. Mr. Nivens wrote to you
before he discussed it with me.
Janet S. Boyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9220 office
Janet. boyer(rancdenr.pov
512 N. Salisbury Street —Archdale Building
1612 Mail Service Center

Raleinh NC 77t194 • •
�-- Nothing Compares,-.._
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 20171:38 PM
To: Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>; Wenner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Vinson, Toby <[e-mail]>; Gantt, Matt <[e-mail]>; Cole, Brad
<[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: East Alamance Quarry
Janet/Judy: What is Jennifer Burdette's/DWR's position on this Zone 2 buffer encroachment for the Installation and
maintenance of an erosion and sedimentation control device? Are there any DWR approvals required?
Please respond by Noon on Friday
Thanks, Tracy
From: Jay Nivens[mailto:Jay.Nivens(&martinmarietta.coml
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 201710:26 AM
To: Davis, Tracy <tracv.davis@ncdencgov>
Cc: Brian North<brian.north(mmartinmarietta.com>
Subject: FW: East Alamance Quarry
Good Morning Mr. Davis,
Judy asked that I speak with you concerning the modification/approval of this mine permit.
We are in the process of modifying our mining permit for our East Alamance Quarry located in Alamance County. This
modification request was made to request a 20' encroachment into the 50' stream buffer. This encroachment provides
for the construction of the embankment/dam section of a stormwater treatment pond fora new lease are we are
providing a customer.
Central Office has determined, after previous reviews, we will now be required to provide a plan to re-establish the
buffer disturbance prior to approval of the permit. The construction of this pond, including the embankment/dam
section within the 20' encroachment, will follow the DEQ approved planting and stabilization standards as specified on
the mine plan.
This mine site is located within the Neuse River Basin. The Neuse River Basin riparian buffer rules requires a 50' buffer
along any intermittent or perennial stream within the basin. This buffer is split into 2 categories: Zone 1 which extends
30' from the stream and Zone 2 which extends the remaining 20'. Zone 1 is to remain undisturbed except for certain
uses and Zone 2 "which shall consist of a stable, vegetated area that is undisturbed except for approved uses and
activities".
The original design of this pond and the embankment/dam was designed so that we stay in compliance with this
ordinance. The embankment/dam section of this pond will be located within the 20' Zone 2 of this buffer. The
maintenance activities for this dam to prevent the growth of vegetation which will be a structural detriment to this dam,

as directed by NCDEQ and the Mine Sa*Health Administration (MSHA), are exemorom the "undisturbed"
requirements for Zone 2. (per the table of uses in the ordinance) Our dam maintenance activities are to mow the dams
we have on our sites twice a year to comply with these requirements and prevent the growth of trees on the dams.
I request this permit be approved as all outstanding issues have been addressed and given the facts that based on the
Neuse Buffer Rules and the planting restrictions for pond embankments/dams we are in compliance with all applicable
laws and ordinances.
Vam sure Judy can provide any details and information previously submitted to NCDEQ.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any further information. I look forward to hearing from
you.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Wehner, Judy mailto.•iudy.wehner@ncdenr.g_ov)
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:30 AM
To: Jay Nivens <Ja .Nivens martinmarietta.com>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL
You need to discuss with Janet and/or Tracy.
From: Jay Nivens [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4:57 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: East Alamance Quary
Judy,
We will be glad to replant the encroachment area. I wish this request could have been made several months ago.
Since this is a request coming from Central Office in your letter please provide the ordinance requiring the buffer to be
replanted and the appropriate planting standard including the specifics of spacing and plants to be used.
We want to be sure we provide the necessary level of detail on the resubmitted plans.
Thanks,
Jay

•
On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:13 PM, Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]> wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL
Janet just informed me that I need to send another letter stating that the 50 foot buffer has to be re-
established. She will not approve the enctoachment.
From: Jay Nivensfmailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:58 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>; Boyer, Janet <]anet.boyer@ncdenr.�ov>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance Quary
Judy,
The buffer encroachment has been requested to construct a treatment pond within the stream buffer
on a lease area we are providing to a customer.
Please see the information below provide to DEQ explaining the request:
The pre -submittal information provided to Matt Gantt to discuss this modification in an email on
9/27/16 (see attached) indicates the proposed construction of a treatment pond within the
stream buffer. This information was forwarded from Matt to your attention indicating a
modification was needed.
The original modification letter dated October 11, 2016 listed "The proposed impacts to the
previously approved 50' stream buffer for the new lease area. This encroachment will encroach
into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer approximately 20' leaving a 30' undisturbed buffer. This
encroachment will run for approximately 350' along the stream channel." The plans clearly
show and label a treatment pond being proposed in this area.
In your letter dated November 6, 2016 you requested additional information on the proposed
treatment pond in this location. (See Item #5) The re -submitted information provided a full
engineering plan for this treatment pond showing the construction of the pond within the
buffer, as requested.
I hope this provides you the necessary information. If I can be of any further assistance please let me
know.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www. m a rtin ma rietta. com

From: Wehner, Judy [mailto:iud*[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:26 PM
To: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North<[e-mail]>
Subject: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL
Why are your requesting to encroach on the stream buffer? I need a description of why you want to
encroach on the buffer. That is what we mean by providing a description of the modification
request. It appears to be expansion of the processing area. Asohalt plant? Stockpiles? Washing
facility? I need this information to describe the modification within the permit.
When a modification request is submitted we need a detailed description of the request.
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
919-707-9227 office
Judy,.Wehner(a-)ncdenr.gov Email
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Norty Carolina 27699-1512
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
<image001.png>
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Kra•
Energy, Mineral e,
Land Resources
6NARCNNYM>L W9LI Y
_ Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7013 2630 0001 8998 9617
Mr. Jay Nivens
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
RE: East Alamance Quarry
Mining Permit No. 01-08
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Nivens:
February 21, 2017
• ROY COOPER
wN,Ra+
MICHAEL S. REGAN
sN.rm.y
TRACY DAVIS-- --
Otmnor
We have reviewed the modification request and additional information your company
submitted for the referenced mine site. In order for this office to complete its review of the
referenced project in accordance with GS 74-50 and 51 of the Mining Act of 1971, please
provide the additional or revised information in accordance with the following comments:
Revise the mine plans to re=establish a mini8mum 50 foot buffer along the stream next
to the lease area. It has been determined that encroachment Into the buffer will not be
approved.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed. In addition, please note this office may request additional
information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
Based upon our review of the submitted project documents, the following
recommendations are offered for your consideration and do not require a response:
It may be beneficial for you to request pre -application meetings with our central and
regional staff to ensure a smoother application process.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
SlR urNaNCaMo I rnnnvrc Quaky I Rner9y. MIMfAImELane Re9p,Rq
S2KShcs Stry 11612M1$eMtt w I1tnlelpF,. NorthtardMali69916a
9197W] 00

• 0
Certified Mail
Mr. Nivens
Page Two
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an
extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to
grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files
at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
ncarely,
udith ehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE

C�
•
Wehner, Judy
From:
Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:58 PM
To:
Wehner, Judy, Boyer, Janet
Cc:
Brian North
Subject:
RE: East Alamance Quary
Attachments:
Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry
Judy,
The buffer encroachment has been requested to construct a treatment pond within the stream buffer on a lease area
we are providing to a customer.
Please see the information below provide to DEQ explaining the request:
The pre -submittal information provided to Matt Gantt to discuss this modification in an email on 9/27/16 (see
attached) indicates the proposed construction of a treatment pond within the stream buffer. This information
was forwarded from Matt to your attention indicating a modiFlation was needed.
The original modification letter dated October 11, 2016listed "The proposed impacts to the previously approved
50'stream buffer for the new lease area. This encroachment will encroach into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer
approximately 20' leaving a 30' undisturbed buffer. This encroachment will run for approximately 350' along
the stream channel." The plans clearly show and label a treatment pond being proposed in this area.
In your letter dated November 6, 2016 you requested additional information on the proposed treatment pond
in this location, (See Item #5) The re -submitted information provided a full engineering plan forthis treatment
pond showing the construction of the pond within the buffer, as requested.
I hope this provides you the necessary information. If I can be of any further assistance please let me know.
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
0.[phone] m.[phone]
www.martinmarietta.com
From: Weimer, Judy jmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:26 PM
To: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brian North <[e-mail]>
Subject: East Alamance Quary
EXTERNAL MAIL

Why are your requesting to encroach A stream buffer? I need a description o4y you want to encroach on the
buffer. That is what we mean by providing a description of the modification request. It appears to be expansion of the
processing area. Asohalt plant? Stockpiles? Washing facility? I need this information to describe the modification
within the permit.
When a modification request is submitted we need a detailed description of the request.
Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
919-707-9227 office
Jud.y.Wehner(@ncdenr.gov Email
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Norty Carolina 27699-1512
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
N t .1 0.-
^Nothing Compares-,,,-.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

Wenner, Judy
From: Jay Nivens <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 9:27 AM
To: Gantt, Matt
Subject: Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry
Attachments: Riley Paving - East Alamance Proposed Development Plans.pdf
Good Morning Matt,
I wanted to see if you could help me out. We have a customer who is looking to build a new asphalt plant at our East
Alamance Quarry, They will be building this within the current mine permitted area. I have attached a plan they have
provided for this proposed development. Normally we hold a 50' undisturbed buffer along each of our creeks within the
permitted area. They have requested permission to encroach into this 50' buffer with the fill slopes of a EC & WQ
treatment basin, They will be holding a 30' undisturbed buffer from the top of bank.
Will this be acceptable under the current mining rules?
Once we get this plan finalized we will be submitting a permit modification to add this development
Thanks for your help] I Havea Great Dayl
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
o. [phone] m. [phone]
www. martin marietta.com

Wehner, Judy
From:
Homewood, Sue
Sent:
Monday, January 30, 2017 4:23 RM
To:
Wehner, Judy
Cc:
Gantt, Matt; Jay Nivens ([e-mail])
Subject:
RE: East Alamance
Judy,
I reviewed the copies of the 404 and 401 permits that were submitted by Martin Marietta. The impacts shown on the
mine map match the impacts shown in these permits and the permits are valid umll 12/31/17.
In addition, I previously noted that a buffer authorization maybe necessary for a stormwater pond, however the Jordan
buffer rules exempt projects that received 401s prior to the rules implementation, so these impacts would be
grandfathered. 1 apologize that my comment on that was in error.
I hope this helps
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W, Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
^Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 30;59 AM
To: Wehner, Judy [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: East Alamance
Hello Judy,
The East Alamance Minehas an Individual 401 from DWR. The 401 expires upon expiration of the 404 issued by the
VSACE and I don't have a copy of that permit so I'm unable to verity the expiration date. Since I no longer have a copy of
the mine plan (sent back after my review), I'm unable to compare the approved impacts with those shown in the recent
mine application,

Thanks, 0
0
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. Homewood a(D.ncdenr.Qov
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Nothing Compares—,, N"D'.
,
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewoodencdenr.gov>
Subject: East Alamance
Please see the last bullet.

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTINCnG' • + r/�' (\/�, ��
Applicant's Name. FrojectName: t�/e! r'�✓i %���� IXti�Yi.{/
r ^ 4V
Appli,/IP/rmit�Na�: /)OI`O� County: IA, Date Received: I P4
Rmietvtr:V l " " River Basin Name:
❑ Neva ❑ Renewal ❑ Ma i ficatim (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modifwation (outside permit 6awssdaries) ❑ Traufo ❑Rekesor
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed: s ❑ For Received.• p
Please ute noire applicat ow arc a//g��e'v:
Ins "Negeonal OffieeG cogWropleG marl&'&($ Regiaal Offw Miming AW-10160s Review
ieP to meapy and attc8 M6 tk DWQradOWR'Misiag Applimion Review Pow^ to da at6n aPy: eewddaR apaaade Rrpi+el
Engineer)
Date: Routed a 4 ' Ra'd
❑ Division of Wafer Resources Date: Routed Re?d
❑ NC Wildlife Resources Commission Date. Routed Reed
❑ US Fish & Wildlife Service Date: Routed Reeed
(Ody nroapplvaiwuaid nadijwtion rrquatsthmodd laid roc tkpenm)
Plane route first 7 pages of the application and any location mops
to
❑
Division of Parks & Recreation
Date: Routed
Rec d
❑
NC Geological Survey Section
Date: Routed
Rec'd
❑
Division of Maim Fisiuries
Date: Routed
Reed
❑
Ditdsion of Soil &Water Conservation (plus LEA)
Dow Routed
Reed
(Ody teaapplications adw iowtimurniams; Ad edd lad w the peroot)
❑
Dioisian of Archives & History
Date. Routed
Ra d
(Ody areo apphoves)
❑
Other:
Date: Routed
Reed
**SuspenseDateforComments:
(wlater than zsdaysfromreceipt)

L
Transmittal Letter
Martin 8701 Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Marietta Charlotte, NC 28217
(P) 704-409-1475 (F) 704-527-9283
To:
NCDEQ - Energy Mining Land Resources
512 N Salisbury Street - 5th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604-1170
Attention:
JudyWehner
Re,
East Alamance Quarry Mine Permit
Modification Resubmittal
w are sen g you
Drawings
�/ Prints
�I
Letter
Change Order
Plans
Reproducible
For Approval
Approved as Submitted Resubmit copies for approval
For Your Use
Approved as Noted
As Requested
Returned for Corrections
Comments:
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further information.
Copy ta:
1/23/17
SI to

Martin •
Marietta
January 23, 2017
Ms. Judy Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDEQ-Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1612
RE: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08
Mine Permit Modification Resubmittal
Dear Ms. Wehner:
This letter is in response to the letter of additional information requested dated January 6, 2017.
The following information has been included to address the items in this letter.
Two copies of the approved 404/401 along with maps detailing the areas of disturbance
have been provide.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or at [e-mail] should
you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
JAN 2 4 2017
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
LAND QUALI7y
MI
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
NING PROGRAM
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
east alamance mine permit modification resubmittal coverletter 1-20-17.docx

F VN A I Fq0 • • Michael F. Easlry, Govcmor
O G William G. Ross Jr., Samtary
r? r Noah Cuoline Department of Envimnmenr end Natural Rmourrm
> y
Colvin H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
CC V G
June 26, 2007 oD
Mr. Steve Whitt RECOVED
V
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Am 2 4 2017
P.O. Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013 LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
Re: Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry Expansion, Alamance County
DWQ #2O050688, Vey. 2; USACE Action ID. No. SAW-2005-21057-201
APPROVAL, of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions - REVISED
Dear Mr. Whitt:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3669 issued to Mr. Steve Whitt and Martin
Marietta Materials, Inc., dated June 26, 2007. This Certification replaces the Certification
issued to you on June 25, 2007. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste,
Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non -discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
rely
Poleen H. Sullins, Director
CHSlcbklijm
Attachments: NCDWQ 401 WQC Summary of Permanent Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
Certificate of Completion
cc: Becky Fox, EPA, 1307 Firefly Road, Whittier, NC 28789
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, Wilmington District, USACOE
Daryl Lamb, DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
DLR Winston-Salem Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Harlan Britt, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 3001 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513
Filename: 05060aVer2MnrtinMariemaEaslAh man"Qua rryExpansion(Atemanm)401 IC_revised
401 OvemiphVExpmss Room Permits Gn0 NaNtirr oljne
16W men Sense Center, Winston-Salem, Noah Carlos 276991650 /tt�r %%
2321 Crabtree Boulemal, Suite 250, Winslon Salem, NOM Censure 276N
Prune: 919-733-17M 1 FAX [phone]Memet: httc:nh2o anr.nate.m m7nowMlands
An Equal OppoaunirylAarmnim Action Empbyer-50% RaoydedNlO% Pad Consumer Paper

\� Mr, Steve Whiled Martin Marietta Materials., Inc.
1 Page of
June 26, 2007
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public
Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to Mr. Steve Whitt and Martin
Marietta Materials, Inc., to fill or otherwise impact 0.44 acres of 404/wetland, and 5,326 linear feet
of (3,044 linear feet perennial stream impact, and 2,282 linear feet intermittent stream impact), to
construct the proposed Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry expansion, which is located south
of Sandy Cross Road (SRI752) and west of NC State Highway 49, approximately 4 miles north of
Interstate 40/85, exit 150, in Alamance County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application dated
November 13, 2006 and received by the DWQ on November 17, 2006, and by Public Notices by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued on the 28" day of November 28 of 2006 and April 25,
2006, (received by DWQ on November 28, 2006, and April 27, 2007, respectively), with
additional information received on February 5, 2007, April 18, 2007, and June 18, 2007.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed
work will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge
guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92.500 and Pill, 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application, the supporting documentation, and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and
as described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new
application for a new Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions of this Certification, Any new owner must notify the Division and request the
Certification be issued in their time. Should wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
additional compensatory mitigation may be required as: described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6)
and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a change in stream or wetland
impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in writing and a new
application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid, compliance with
the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Type of Impact
I Amount Approved ails
Plan Location or Reference
404/Wetland
1 0.44 acres
Application and Public Notice
Stream- perennial
3,044 linear feel
Application and Public Notice
Stream - imerminent
2,2s2 linear feet1
Application and Public Notice

. Mr. Steve Whitt an rtin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Page 3 of 6
.Zane 26, 2007
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or ]eased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the
construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be
clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the
areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any
land disturbing activities;
Continuing Compliance:
6. Mr. Steve Whitt and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. shall conduct construction activities
in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements
resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other
appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that
such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are
necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this
Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards
and requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the
Certification, the Division shall notify Mr. Steve Whitt and Martin Marietta Materials,

Mr. Steve WhiMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Page 4 of
June 26, 2007
Inc., and the US Amy Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity fur public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr. Steve Whitt
and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. in writing, shall be provided to the United States
Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
ti ation:
7. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. 'We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. Until the EEP receives and cleats your check (made payable to:
DENR— Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if
you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have 60
calendar days from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting
purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands
Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required
River and Sub -basin Number
Stream - perennial 13,044
linear feet
Cape Fear/03030002
S. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division
of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control
program, an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCG010000) administered by DWQ is
automatically issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be
discharged during land disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the
permit. If your project is covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that
disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the
sedimentation control plan, self -monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements
are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
hlto•//h2o enr state nc us/su/Forms Documents him.;
9. Culvert Installation
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved
BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance
Activities manual
(http�//www.ncdot.oraMoli/operations/13MP manual/downloadBMP Manual ndfl

Mr. Steve Whitt and in Marietta Materials, Inc.
Page S of 6
June 26, 2007
such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to
prevent excavation in flowing water.
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below
locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life
movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are
or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes
installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re -installed correctly,
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of
the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and
below locations of each culvert. Therefore, you must provide plans with adequate details
that indicate that the current stability of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You
must receive written approval from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is
installed. Culvert(s) must be installed according to approved plans.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater
than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less
than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is
required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing
by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening
methods. If rip -rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically
approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project, Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion form.

Mr. Steve Whi Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Page 6 of 6
June 26, 2007
10. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Winston-Salem, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to art adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27699-6714. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you
have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty
(60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 26" day of June 2 7
DIVISION OF WAXM�ER�ALITY
�oleen H. Sullins, Director
9m*e
CHS/ebk/rlm

a �QQ WAT%0 • ichael F. Easley, Governor
Q L William G. Ross IT., Secmmry
yr North Carolina Department ofEnvironmeeund Namral Rrsources
y
D Y Coleco H. Sullins,aDhaetor
Division or WWateis r Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with ISA NCAC 2H.0500, Mr. Steve Whitt and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., to fill or otherwise
impact OA4 acres of 404/wetland, and 5,326 linear feet of (3,044 linear feet perennial stream impact, and 2,282
linear feet intermittent stream impact), to construct the proposed Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry expansion,
which is located south of Sandy Cross Road (SR1752) and west of NC State Highway 49, approximately 4 miles
north of Interstate 40/85, exit 150, in Alamance County, North Carolina. All activities associated with these
authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM
DWQ PROJECT N:
20050688, Ver.2
LOCATION:
Near Green Level
COUNTY
Alamance
BASIN/ SUB BASIN
Cape Fear/03030002
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Certification, you are required to compensate for
the above mitigable impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands, surface
waters and riparian buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities thm impact or degrade the waters of
the slate.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to he mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must be
rounded to one -quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest
foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts . Mitigation
31044 Linear Feet of Perennial Stream 3,044 Linear Feet of Perennial Stream
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the payment of
a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund pu NCAC2R.0503. tfyou choose this option, please sign this form and
mail the form along with a copy of your 401 Certification or Buffer Approval to the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program at the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt
of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT
PROGRAM.
Signature
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1652
[phone]
Filename, OSO6BBVer2Mani rah emErs lamanecQuarryExpansion(Alamance)401IC EEP
401 OversightrExpress Review Permitting Unit
16%Mail Smvicr Centro, aguish, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Colors: Bwlrvprd. Suite 250. Raleigh. North Carolina 276W
M Equal Opponwity/Amrnvtive Aelum Employer- 50%Recyded/lM Pon Consumer Paper

401/404 PERMIT APPLICATION
DRAWINGS
DESIGNED FOR,
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS
FOR
EAST ALAMANCE QUARRY
PRELMNMY.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
FOR PE TTNG PURPOSE5 ONLY.
IIP1L'�I
Kimley-Horn=
C]M❑
and Associates, Inc.
P0. BO[ /M-MIHUI WTX CYNM AI6J000IR
R N°16T''0m �'�1ppf °"-�O
NOVEMBER 1, 2005
eYJ�
011185024

Iw .. w ww w w w WIM WW a V V W WW.. WWIW
ULM
___ —�IF I IFIF
^1_
NO
Aoctm MA
Ks
ANN. -Ic z
IC
v ,.. w,mo _
E
. I fDIP
a itMARIN
y4.....-1 S.
b \ '1 m MmW.R��,'I Le
I- a
i _
. . .
\ I63 IpMWRx P R
PI
AN N m Pvm .v0, I, lR ulLL�i Mll.fl
uu �a YIP x ' �'\ _
AN, INxv wv •� I t l `3` _ e B0 A a ni ` L v� -
` .� I ``.il{ mot/' A Ay
w i .n.+r.\,... A� 1'\J' .ORX -
1 .Oa.eayyv /IN
Y
Avt I I S \ I PnW.,t.0
tlplf SEE AND LOCAVON W DRYPOND MACY TO _
At y� .ADDHNMAL HYDRAULIC
Gf AS �L�`J MOT idl Wilp1
MFORMArON IS ACQUIRED.L100�� O lOM PEI✓•VIigD gWPofg6 dLY.
"TWUNE RN:NT'
Klmley-Hmn IMTEAIAL�S TA EAST ALAuuN¢ auunY
cowry. NDM+M SAN
��❑ and Associates, Inc WETLANN W AACT _ ALANNs¢ owA

550
y
-
!,
<
R
owmaw
uawc vfmxio+T,a.IW Rw5
WRR Pp
a
iiiii oxwmdmxo [w Ip
«Fxcx«x rrou
T;tmvwx '. -
/
'
'.mxox. rz nm
- ff M ww aMp. i
..
` ' RmraseR muwo
nz
us acre
} I
• vxr �.mR b''._
oi.,,um T"ar xw a.•..eF'S6nm5650
um T
n«MruRr.
1 `'.
WrFOP COx9rxYCiWM,
FM FE1MRNi RRV06E8 <KV.
KlmleyHOM
❑� ❑ and Anwato, IM.
MAFr W MMMA
MATE LS
_
uar uuue� auuw+
u.x�r.ri �mr.,.. xoRm c�xame.
-- - - —
eoros c c

5
Si
C e ay
we
es
e!
€
I
5
lei
p atgzliltsp
y IN i[a Gtl
�g
i _
Q
no
�[ S gg
gg pPp�`y
` aeY33
T
zg
i
1.Y \ \
1
,

.17
�`�, (11 Z�
Cl) —
�m -
•— �rf�wi¢ xmmx
ttttt
_sm
Y .. eAlm,
-.- -m rmwnmreiwinox
MARTIN MARETTA ..." um u.uuxce auuwr
Kimley-Horn MATE s « ,�
-- ❑�� and Associates, Inc. ATER
-- _ -- -- -- - a¢s -- —

5_
m amT.
MEOMML
4211,411
jwr<�
RKSIX ITT..a.. x..o
TOW'S
r a.w
INSIST WAWOW cSWISTEW
MISS .i� =
rl;.
ww�
,. .
.m—
DIWO
yl.M
aq ..a.
.m. .....Wm. MI
MITI "M 4 ®u.m.OxW.
SLOW -.m
W SURE MIT nSL .ti ae WSW O [, t
ui
EuTwIM,m, wu MAT Mw°w=% MS11140
FARM PCM CONCEPT F OFl�
mm wc. mare
�w m•w
e:xti -r
gBaouPr.
PA/9YI1M]11NtlE0 M..
16mley-Hun
M RM MMMIETTAMATEFUALS
e e wvw mE a wn
Ass
w e e oou n. xox x
and
Ia• S IXU WA T

r-wwwwww
CIA
ad z
ad z
�gG�a4
^.A fA<
.i.19gA
55
Z
))
n
4OC3i�R
0
A
a
a
m
U
(/I
D
m"
f7
x�
M
q
m
q
zj
0
o
a
y
m
D D
m
A
m 0
m
Z
>
2
rrI N
0 > a
rrI
N ; O
r>,
m
o
A ' fT1
yCD
m N
r
OD
�oz
II'
S
<
DX�
Dim O
>
>
A0D
0 Fj
0z�l'
m m (n
z
z
p
Z (JI .-f_7
Ox'�
-V(/�
m
D r
N fN
03
y
a
;z
o'
N n
z O
O
n
A D
i
mr
DD
z
D
o
y
fn
31Y N013AN05 ONY, ,VN015S3l011d-
'N061AIMS 40
NOWNUM 3HJ 01 NOIld30Y3 N3H10 80 '13Atl0S 03113080
-11D10] Y S130NY4 0N051.3 30 NOIIVNINHOOlW 3H1
sY H]Os '1N0]31V0 N3HION1 4 Sl A3ASM SINI IVH{ 'O -jr
l
O3MNVY1 sY OIIIMOIIO!
3N1 >3tlON bO 3N0 01 .lLLtl3] 'CCZC-Sld ON N01] SMS
ONVI rrgrss3load --__-- �..
/
L
l�A.fllA LWf
Akf Bq/.qu,
•'y.:'e�°'.�„ SLY
'q; %
4 s ''INN
44 �'� �{T
M1NM1f eN., ,YMS{JAY.
3111
9ooz J.r
:al+\ aiiiro•.. I.l.. .� Im Inu. wnnn.Ie.. Y.nAm!' S
j1\\%�,. ,Hf13 O�ti •�' m.n4n I�..... .....u.o[ o .1.0 ml. Yawo<a» � n >
\ .ui 1 :o.Au Y ,: wlq n... o..o - z o
EE2E•1 Pma... vo,... .nu..< P.a...» In. ,n.......... N '�
1d38 i . ..,..a . ... .-_..onlnei ? t
bDI b .nYMa.ea . up.puY le "a, .W M. I('al.' .do.
9 e £ -
•.•'t�,199�a¢O..a02P �nnB w »w.», wnqu.•. ..PI (wpw.dn. 1u --�
hI�OHV0�H1 n..n ....n tw» Inman .nl .. 11 wnln..a. A. NP.....,. In. c NWr
III... WYNYYY`l.Id .IVI J.VI IIIIMa' 'P
11N000 HLAS80J
YlAvdaj N18ON
I I �
WE
o
40
u
1
A r
I 1 i
A
\`
yr
m
m
N$
I.. \G�rsl
I
y
o, U
au aT
� o0
F
A.et
I eyNf.Y
APPROM. BOUHDATI ' — — _
OF FUTURE PIT
m
i:Y
I
}
S
I �
A I L
0
1 "x 4
i
�'v
6
xziQf
i
z
� µp
a
I
i
I
I
�GL
I
?F 4
I
ae:
I
I
I
i
I
a
I
1 9
1
1
1
1
e E
��'
tlCAg
y�qry
gM00
Hai
-
w.a
P9T
'•�. A�4
o
L) C

e
•

WE ELAN
WETLAND '8'
STREAM "A" FROM WETLAND "A"
TO BEGINNING OF IMPORTANT
STREAM "A' FROM BEGINNING OF
IMPORTANT POINT
TO FUTURE PIT BOUNDARY
STREAM "A� SOUTH OF FUTURE PIT
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
RARING
L 193
Y5.56
IDI'2B9YL
uM
79be
s '
Lfei
fi E
RYatwE
LIDS
167 D
0a
LM9
3SM64M
111 46-w
'LS'xl'S6'V
LPill ESS
3AX
z M47-E
nmmT
!92
..m
sorsrNT
L19
55.67
5EY3&
LIM
TJT
9Je'M9[S
617
6LM
53 $j
LMS
LI%
E315
S99S5S'V
ao�MET
S12' 9'V
USE
USE
MET
]0p
w4YV
SiYV
=
LIM
yd.
S51' 2'RV
LINE
N9'1i'tPv
Law
12.2"A
TV
L2M
3M
W746
LEM
1273
M4-0 -W
SSS'M2„v
LESS
5)S
SM'S9'mv
LESS
1217
Wc
SL-)YSfC
M7
27JIS467
ll v
S]YW'I.v
LM
LFM
2.E]
3"T22'V
L2119
TS6T
LIID
172,SPY[92°v
Pill
tom
It9
SM- ]oY
LED
1-at,SR'XTL'I.
L21S
SSKE-11372
L2N
AM
EWE
S19'II'NS
R
!MI
SM91'M-V
L216
JELSD
N5925'53'V
La
W.97 R.91
ND9']PNv
Lae
3.3
L21e
S
SNS3.2V'SPrNM''V
L2A
S
V
Lnl
M-471Tv
L22
3979
MSIfTNE
La7
M"
M7'S'."T
La.
35es
a 7
L25
2!5r
STREAM "B"
LI1-IE TABLE
W4
LEN6TX
I TMAkliSt-
,,,"P
NJl'01 EI'v
2
y.]2
M
9eJ9
X)Y,YIYv
W.]
3 M
Nx
LI-1
2931
Ml[451
L146
5°M
NE9'R'31'V
LIQ
WPM'19'[
uM
nm
I Ip-nME
LISP
xAL
SM4Y0.'E
LEMISP
_ 1
LIR
ME METE
- S] S15'2Tv
LH3
aA4
ibb9
33992'ISC
L
IUL
51f J2
I55
LEIS
N5'L
L
no
N41115"M595fw
LOx
9SY
K6'I559'V
uv
,]a
pinIEElciry
A
Iwrjv3W
tILISP9
E4M
pMEE A'444
]9,u'
4 I
NSl VS'M'C
LISE
MAT
%43
M.q
L
QV29 L
M9.24
Oil
LI •
E2 ]9
SI
569'3.'90'C
L16S
I5Y
S
)5l1
395
WIVM
LAW IS1
.
MY,ra-v.30E•V
LIN
TRW
wra?Mromi52-v
L169
Eb3
BV
N1DM'S '
LIPS
11191
•9li
LinM9E
S3H
WY)Y05'V
T3"4.v
tL172j?I
m
ss
mwv
MIS
am
N[rnYrw
tin
9AR
N44'55'30'v
LIVE
is
@ EE47v
L177
Wit
NYx911'v
We
4"99
NA'aYfE
Lm
4aM
142EIv1-C
Me
%.A
¢ 2
el
56
S7YSB'%'C
5°JO
S)fE5'SfC
LIP)
1231
Kl 3J•C
ue.
ILEI
P41155'I2-C
STREAM -Co
LINE TABLE
LINE
I LENGTH
I BEARING
LIMP
19.92
s71-m M'v
LINE
LR
Yy S 5'v
111
06W
1]7'SPIS'v
rimi5A7
SW%'S9-W
LN]
00>3
S M'V
L1341
111J13
S 'R'1]'V
LIP
JLJ)EI
311319tl'V
STREAM "0"
LONE TABLE
1111C
LMTH
BEARING
L119
EllElip
NSW'35'31-E
SN
.3!]
NLY11'25T
LIIB
r-m
SB]'IDwr
19
24W
4-11'07S
Ll"i
N9
mili-35-cm
MIT
Nell
w-MS.T
Lla
NET
SALE IS 00T
LR.
R33
MYOivYV
L125
2Fn
NM'i US
L 6
,9]3
M61'12'MY
Lin
M24
W.ST 6T
tl
P.M
M1l6V D'[
Lin
4WI
"I AE-12'E
LIN
37
IQe'u' AC
6.331
31
MM-SYSYE
MN
a.A
1,17177-501L
LEW
40I9
NS2'Tt -c
UP
10491E�n
LIN
IW
IN'YI7c
tax
933
M44v6•34-c
Lin
.DR
tCN'3f¢IS
LI]9HE&F
S73'43n'E
LEAD
PIAllE
00- M'C
WPACMD SIMS OF BOWS CREEK
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
I REARING
LIN
1145
327-14, v
Lag
X95
3R291CV
LIN
L 31
ISM
SWWD4.V
a2
'1 J1
530"EB
LEJ3
26.79
51]Y9']3'v
Le"
ZZAO
S v
LE3
1549
l']
%75652'v
Lab
21:
SVYV
"'16TYv
La]
2193
S
L
1
.L'Y'II'V
L09
1E.13
535'16',v
cm�7
All
LP51
Ye
sa-MISv
LN2
I
/ INSET
\
BOSURVEY OF
% POTENTIAL
CREEK
STREAM STREAM CROSSING 1
C/L OF BOYD'S CREEK I
AT PROPOSED CROSSING
I N B85711.21
E 1893550.15 0,{0
SHEET 2 OF 2
SURVEY 0L:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
,luilmnAl All ®
VATHIN THE PERMITTED MINE EXPANSION AREA
AT EAST ALAMANCE QUARRY
f
I
PLAT OF SURELY Fbt:
..<
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC,
P.O. BOX 30013
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622
PEAK,Zgj
TOWNSHIP: FAUCETIE CWNTY: ALAMANCE NORTH CAROUNA
WWTT LAND SURVEYING P.O. TAX PARCEL 3-tfi-SIB POPE 0 200
on WAIKAI IWILA
wMi7W-SALVI,w 27,03
!J%1122-w. DAM: NNE 16, 2006 SCALE: 1--20U

Kro
Energy. Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
r1
U
January 6, 2017
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7013 2630 0001 8998 9327
Mr. Jay Nivens
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
RE: East Alamance Quarry
Mining Permit No. 01-08
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Nivens:
• ROY COOPER
ae,.Ne
WILLIAM G. ROSS, IR.
Aa Shy
TRACY E. DAVIS
OReomr
We have reviewed the modification request your company submitted for the referenced
mine site. In order for this office to complete its review of the referenced project in accordance
with GS 74-50 and 51 of the Mining Act of 1971, please provide the additional or revised
information in accordance with the following comments:
Provide copies of DWQ #20050688 and USACE ID#SAW-2005-21057-201 issued in
2007 so this office can verity the coverage area and validity.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed. In addition, please note this office may request additional
information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
Based upon our review of the submitted project documents, the following
recommendations are offered for your consideration and do not require a response:
It may be beneficial for you to request pre -application meetings with our central and
regional staff to ensure a smoother application process.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Slate of Na Cnaiva I Fawnuoe,asl QoE4ry I End, him" and and 0.aou,a
1612 Mul Sam,A C®Iv 1512 N. SsOsbu St I UNRIT, NC 27699
919 707 9200 T

0 •
Certified Mail
Mr. Nivens
Page Two
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an
extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to
grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files
at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Ju�Sincerely, I ,
ehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
cc'. Mr. Matt Gantt, PE

Wehner, Judy
From:
Homewood, Sue
Sent:
Friday, January 06, 2017 10:59 AM
To:
Wehner, Judy
Subject
RE: East Alamance
Hello Judy,
The East Alamance Mine has an Individual 401 from DWR. The 401 expires upon expiration of the 404 issued by the
USACE and I don't have a copy of that permit so I'm unable to verify the expiration date. Since I no longer have a copy of
the mine plan (sent back after my review), I'm unable to compare the approved impacts with those shown in the recent
mine application.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 offio s
336 613 1663 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes MITI Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
1C. - �Nothing Compares -
Email correspondence fo and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Friday, January 06, 201710:16 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: East Alamance
Please see the last bullet.

0 •

Wehner, Judy
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Wednesday, December 21, 201612:43 PM
To:
Wehner, Judy; Boyer, Janet
Subject:
East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Attachments:
DOC322116-12212016123615.pdf
Janet and Judy,
Here are DWR and DAQ comments for the East Alamance Quarry. I don't believe I sent this to you yet. It got "lost" In
the of0ce between the basement and 3rtl floors and just turned back up.
Thanks,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9654 mobile/direct
[e-mail]
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Fc. :' Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

4D •

Prof this M b PDF Reb OF orMls brm b DEML CO Dy email W D
MINING PE MIT APPLICATION
for the
t oeetlen�'6a�OrssY�.
FI Dep rtment of `?
Environmental Quality
Received
NOY 0ll 20%
ppg�i�nal Office
Protect Name: East Alamance Quarry DEMLR Permit # 01-08 Cou {'�" � OahFbt' -
Applicant's Email: Jay. [e-mail] AILtfy�ct,
PERMIT ACTION TYPE modification
YES N2 Date Commenclno
r r
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? A r 1980
Latitude: 36.12851 Longitude:-79.35503
Please return comments to (at DEMLR CO): Judy Wenner
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWR:
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: Bovds Creek, WS-V. NSW
DWR Compliance Status of Mine:
Does this mine (or previous owner) have DWR back fees to pay? If yes, amount:
Is this mine an active permit in RIMS?
Does DWR RO suspect or know of nearby r r3
wetlands to the site? —

Pent Nie lam M PDF Retum PDF of this term to DEMLR CD by smell. cc DEMLR RO, DWR BW. aswaoterkift rneY.
Stream Determination Needed? I need for a 401 for the I r
Does DWR RO need a statement that no
wetlandsistreams are disturbed r P
for this prolect from applicant?
Buffer Determination Complstsd? I r I Pl
New Recycle System permit rsqulrsd?e I r,— I yl,
Enough information to determine? —
Does this applicant need to contact the
regional of Central DWR Office to n P1
determine If a State Stormwater Permit Is I -
I1Unknown.
Will wastewaters discharge to HOW waters i— ®,7Q10 Permittee
with a 7010=0? " Flow: must
determine.
Mine must wall to dawater until an O&M plan Is
approved?

ob •

FmrttMnrmmbpw Wum PDForMb Mrm MDEALLRDODyGm@ff wDEAJRRO,DWRSPU.
• •
sawaaoybloprmYM.
Reviewed by:
DWR RO Surface Water: Sue Homewood Regional Office: WSRO Date: 11/3116
RO Aquifer Protection Section: Regional Office: _ Date:

0 •

MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
Forthe
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ProjectlNumber: Martin Marietta Materials Inc. — East Alamance Quarry County: Alamance
Please return comments back to: Matt Gantt, P.E.. WSRO
Comments due by: November 4, 2016
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of air quality? No
Comments. This facility is operating under Air Quality Permit No. 06132R17.
YES
Air permit required
Air permit existing X (Permit # 006132R17)
NO
MAN
Other Comments: Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. — East Alamance Quarry (NC DAQ
Reviewed by: � � - Date: October 31, 2010
Print Name: Jalal Adoull
Cantrel Olfiw R@vWwer
Ray Dec ZON

0 •

Wehner, Judy
From: Gantt, Matt
Sent: Friday, December 16, 20161:27 PM
To: Boyer, Janet; Wehner, Judy
Subject: East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Hi Janet and Judy,
I have reviewed the revised modification submittal for the Martin Marietta East Alamance Quarry (01-09) and have the
following comments:
1. Corrections to the plan have been made per my discussion with Jay Nivens on December 5, 2016. The only
remaining issue I see is the 20' encroachment into the buffer zone below the Treatment Pond. I'll let you make
the call on that one.
Thanks,
Matt
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9664 mobile/direct
Matt. [e-mail]
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
1C. / Nothing Compares,..
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

0 •

Wehner, Judy
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Wednesday, December 07, 20161:10 PM
To:
Werner, Judy, Boyer, Janet
Cc:
Vinson, Toby
Subject:
FW: Martin Marietta East Alamance Mine Permit Modification
Attachments:
SKMBT C36016112909240.pdf
Hi Janet and Judy,
Jay Nivens and I discussed the East Alamance Quarry Permit Modification on December 5. We have all of the RO issues
hammered out. He still had a question or two regarding your comments. He will be calling you if he has not done so
already.
Thanksl
From: Jay Nivens Imallto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:40 AM
To: Gantt, Matt <[e-mail]>
Subject: Martin Marietta East Alamance Mine Permit Modification
Good Morning Matt,
I hope you had a great Thanksgiving.
Can you let me who was the reviewer for the last review for this permit modification? I would like to meet with them to
discuss this project prior to resubmitting this plans.
Thanks for your help
Thanks,
Jay Nivens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540 Charlotte, NC 28217
0.[phone] M. J980)613-9009
www. martinma rletta.com

0 •

MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTINGG YM Applicant's Name: ('-sal M ProjectNa�Ime: ) r N 4 M OCj 040vv
Applic./P"it No: LOJS Gmortr:WmNfir,�,-_ Date Received: C1I)a I
Reuieumr: �� Rim
Basin Na: ��1 an, "IaA j
❑ w ❑ne New Rewal Modifuntion (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modification (outside permipkoundanes) ❑ Transfer ❑Release
❑ Partial Release b Additional Information ❑ Fee Needed: s ❑ Fee Reeeiv a: s
leas
ute entire appli Lion ckage to :
✓')
-e.__.Regnon d Off ion (i.*d, ropes; Wmsd Ik °LQS Repwa Cff" Mi ml AWkwim Review
OAMeawearydrtaek kd the DWQd DWR •Ming AWKation Review Fenno w deatlwary; d
iednow w d. Regiwi
Engineer) n
Date: Routed
a- I
1
Rea
❑
Division of Water Resources Date: Routed
Rea
❑
NCWiWife Resources Commission Date: Be"
Reece
❑
US FisshhLe Wildlife Service Date: Routed
Rerd
(qdp new gpIkatim d modification requeas that cold W 0Ike permit)
Please route first 3 pages of the application and any location maps to:
❑
Division of Parks b Recreation Dme: Routed
Rec d
❑
NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed
Rey d
❑
Division of Marine Fisheries Date: Routed
Rei d
❑
Division of Soil d! Water Conservation (plus LEA) Date Routed
Rec'd
(Od3 new oppliva asid nrdifca imu mgwas that add bad to the puma)
❑
Division of Archives & History Date: Routed
Rec'd
(Only new awwants)
❑
Other. Date: Routed
Rey d
** Susperm Date foe Cann rtenfst J a 13D 1 Ib (no later than Is days f+om receipt)
❑ Please rote the following:

10 •

Transmittal Letter
Martin DEC 072016 8701 Marietta
701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
MQrletta LAND QUALI7y Charlotte, NC 28217
MINING PROGRAM (P) 704-409-1475 (F) 704-527-9293
NCDEQ - Energy Mining Land Resources
512 N Salisbury Street - 5th Floor
Relsiah. NC 27604-1170
Weiner
Alamance Quarry Mine Permit
fication Resubmittal
Copies
2
Mine Permit Modification Resubmiltal Package (revised mine plan, revised engineering
calculations, revised drainage area maps & asphalt site treatment pond detail)

Martin
Marietta
December 6, 2016
RECEIVED
Ms. Judy Wetmer
pEC 07 2016
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDEQ-Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
LAND QUALITY
1612 Mail Service Center
MINING PROGRAM
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
RE: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08
Mine Permit Modification Resubmitml
Dear Ms. Wehner.
This letter is in response to the initial review of the mine permit modification dated: November
9, 2016. The following information has been included to address the initial comments.
• Comment #1: The minor adjustment in acreage is based on more accurate data. The
following categories have been revised: Tailings/Sediment Ponds from 12.5 ac to 15.7
ac; Stockpiles from 54.5 ac to 3.3 ac; Wastepiles from 90.6 ac to 82.0 ac.; Process
Area/Haul Roads from 82.4 ac to 98.2 ac.; and Mine Excavation from 168.4 ac to 173.5
ac.; Total Affected Acreage from 411.4 ac to 372.7 ac and Total Site Area from 610.61
ac to 600.2 ac.
• Comment #2: The overburden berms have been revised to more accurately depict the
area available. These areas have been revised due to erosion control measures, stream
buffers. The berms adjacent to Martin Marietta Drive, east of the stream and west of the
property boundary have been removed. Slope drains are evaluated for each phase during
berm construction. A note has been added to the Berm Detail regarding slope drains.
Re -vegetation of proposed berms will comply with planting and seeding information
listed on the plan.
• Comment 43: The volume reduction for the use of a rip rap bathe has been taken into
account within the basin design worksheet provided. All basin designs exceed the
required volume with the use of the proposed bale.
• Comment #4: The Drainage Area Maps show the information requested.
• Comment #5: The design plans for the treatment pond have been included.
• Comment #6: The labels have been corrected to accurately designate each culvert.
• Comments #7 & 8: These comment have been addressed with Regional Staff. The
culverts will not be installed in areas of base flow. The alignment for Culvert A has
been revised.
• Comments #9 & 10: These comments have been addressed with Regional Staff. A note
has been added to state all diversion ditches must have positive flow into basins.
east alamance mine permit modification resubmitial coverletter 12-6-16.docx

O

• 0
Martin
Marietta
• Comment #11: The approved 401/404 permit numbers are DWQ #20050688 and
USACE ID #SAW-2005-21057-201 respectively approved in 2007.
I have included the Revised Mine Plan, Revised Drainage Area Maps and Erosion Control
Design Calculations.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or at [e-mail] should
you have any questions or need any additional information.
Jay rYvens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
east alamance mine permit modification resubmittal coverletter 12-6-16.docx

0
/A Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Mine Permit Modification
• Storm Drain Calculations
• Erosion Control Design Calculations
• Drainage Area Maps
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
704-407-1475
D m� 15, 2014

CW1 A
C~B
martin
Marietta
8701 RM q B .
Cesk98. NC 28217
Storm Drainage Calculations
Rmv 12.5-16 Pmod Nuns: East Alamance DAY
��o���m®��mmtavaa2�cac�mtta®
aaaaa�rtir>•aaa�aa�l—a�aaa®w
a�aa�w•:
c�
lla�a�li
Culvert A Rip Rap Apron Sizing Calculations
NC Seal aW aR Ermil Cam wnwi NMOT wlnm 1Aw radix e.B6s)
rpa as
A Yww
raN
vWdV
ranw
p�
LJ�enP
v.5
2
�5
16
ilwi5
E
9$
3 S
16'
1! 9
1 I I2R/2E161192W
•

•
•
J/AMartin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 06.63- Rock Dom Sediment Burin Calculations
with Class B Rip Rap Bolile
DATE October 5, 2016
BASIN 1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN — AC Max. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN — AC
Tc= 5 MIN INTENSITY(]to)= 7.03 C= 0.60
INTENSITY (1,$) = 8.21
Q25=CIA= 0.6 x 8.21 x 2.60 = 12.81 cfs
v.v It t.vw x a.w — iv.rt cn
UM VOLUME REQUIRED 2.60 x CF
CE AREA REQUIRED Qio 10.97 x = SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS L W sot. dr do th vvlu�ume
Bottom
Stange
Spillway
Top
3,200 0
92 52 3
0
11,976
0
11,976
17,056
29,088
1 96 1 56 15,3761 4
5,080
104 1 64 16,6561 b
112,032
'Inside slopes ® 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE=
3
Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,380
Cu. FL
Dimensions = Top Width2; Bottom Width S'
1.380 Volume Cu. Ft.
Height 3' (I:1 side slopes)
Length = Basin Storage Length
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = _Cu. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT=
4
Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT=
6
Ft
SPILLWAY -L=(Q)/(3 x It") =
4
Ft Use Minimum of lO
Spillway Flaw Depth(ft) = I

Ma
riMartin
etta
a
NCECSM M C61-SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN CALCULATIONS
R1sr and BLrre1
DATE: OtYRn S.l01E
MMN 0 SLYms BUY11 uWwAZAYAAMi)I AC IR AC
AC
T[- S MIN M1RNST'010 TJJ C- IN
IMFNSITY0') LSI
0b WI13!
m eh
ULTA-
Ob 17.W b 1IJSO
I6.W
Ch-jiCIA-
1,
CIA- Le 1, 11,01 1, 1u.w
wT.
MINIMUM VOLUME REX)Ull D
IJ.M IIM
CF
SL'RFACFAREARFf HEnO Qn
f64L
SF
MEN STORAGE dMFNS10NS
L
N'
rWmMW
Nn�
JI,NO 0
0
ii J:l
)
N.M
SFinv J)0
110
PeW
E,W
TN JH
136
A01e 6
ID81
'Yeik PWnk ):I
DEPTH OF STOMOF-
) P
RMK RAFFLE V0LU1W gFWC110Y
Im hn
INnn.im.- T" W1JR^BmmO WAh r
IMM
volui N.
XeSPI
ImIN•BWeSMpe LmSIE
STORAGE VOUUME FROVIOm-
_[F
SPILLWAY NOONT•
0
TGPOFOAMNEIGM•
6
SPILLWAY-L-IOndOab"1
N P Um Mvm®aL0
sgOwq"mO fl)- I
FRlydulb Sldsss SperiBudlim
v.m.mm.mowm.
_
a.wmwlMn
Vaume
sLNm. rym wmmn
65N5
A®mv Q!'eGueln )
1
qT4%
ErIew" spillway cRKRMIMs
h Dnishi whoC 1)- I wPaY III, NO SimN6661
Elwryle81i11wq Sia lRirl
_ximmi
Mimnum spllwvy Cquip
0.74 f0
XNpPI M1an TM of Riaeb Emn9my Spllwq
_P
21, Pw I[hl
AnwlUmipn Capiry
53" do
a
pl m
Umtl S'IV IJ'Mmimum
Io,i
I'M OS(
Bwrtl Am-IJ•RYmum
R pM m
IAI
AE ,Mmeanp I.rnplb
—P
BRbJury CR601SI10Rs
I ryve Im, Riv Am A Ew
III& r VhgfM or Wow M M M. Po3.11
IIJJ N
D,,,,,"Fmce DgnPAImpPA WidS. Wey6l ofCmtrzlepnd.Rlltb)
IIJJ N
m
BRINI gmnsMm
ilM
Lmrm
W Mh Em Nmlrn
Al
IN IP PI

Marie
tta
NCECSM M L61-SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN CALCULATIONS
RhAr and Barrel
DATE: Ikebs LRale
BASINn ft m 4 91 A[ is A(
4g5NO®::aEAMaA4u AC
h- 5 MIN INTENSITY Ill.) - 1.03 ( 0w
uOrnfiBMY IIa) 8.81
OA-1 Ob 8]I MA
m On
1,
Oa- OA- Ob 1O5 19.fp
CES Na
Oa• OA-1 Ob 5U5 JA 1199)
985 I,f,
MINIMUM VOLUME..R WMIX)
1 19AR 118
CF
SURFACE AREA, REQUIRED 01.
R35
8i
IABIH STOM02 dMElJBN)H8
L W
"lane am.vdume
I6a..
IIM
1 0 0
6Mp M3 1 I57
) IN.)16 I(0.116
9pRlrq M5
9W
TI73 fM
5N310
'L IN
O}M
6 .
W91215A6TOP
'Ins]eageaW l:l
IIEpFN OF 6-fdU0E-
5 R
ROCRIALiLF.Vd.UME REI1Kl1ON
ltl5 Cu.N.
ITnuuw iq WWl^.baWW 1'
Itl5
ValwaC"h.
xadl YIII as tlupa
Imam-Iwn Sbgelup
STOPPAGE VOIAME PROVIDED-
—CF
SPILLWAY UPORT-
5
I OR OF DAM FRONT
6
INJAWAY 4IOxi1U ale"1
I fl UwM ammo of 20
SNOWS Rim Caplin I
I I rclmll SWAIM r SpadIBcalima
1Tlumaof Bu:nmlMnn
Pn6rvm(dAn Vdume
me Nl+Diamnn 5'
z 651b
Almmn()nGaSUumne I"
5 91iM6
Principle Ipinwid Cakablbn
Rircipl<Bpllwry CaPCO' ]�➢rPW FI"wM5ule5uMu66.61
napla Spllray SPr lRlrl
_N my
Minunum 8pil lwly Cycly
58.85 [R
H,AIfiw lopof aid w F,,amr, 5pllm'y
_R
'ryr hLL Row NAM
Ad"Odpn Carroty
Mbl da >
589
Intl Slw 15' Minimum
Riv Am-
A91
fowl Ann. IJ'maim
RquimlAm
736
PmuimYArm
9.e'
Aµmnimoa INnvlL ath
_R
Bnyof ( Ocultlbu
LImuJIme Riau Am a Rim
Ilan a WINN of WYu p Can1626)
ims
II,
Onuluvn Fmr" OgQaLmYma R'pI6a M'a8R16fCwoeb mCU FLI8l b1
lMA
Ile dig;
ualbl Olmnabna
s
LtyA
WMR: PpM Amlm
!fl
IA1 IRI M

Martin
Marietta
East Alamauee Quarry
NCSE.CDM 0 6.63 - Rack Den Sediment again Calculadonx
with Clan B Rip Rap Baffle
U411 Ilonm L,r S, EIIIM1
If nvn n - TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN 11111 AC Mex. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSITY(llo) = 7.0 C= O.60
INTENSITY(6) R21
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 9.21 x 4.20 - 20.0 ca
.Lm=
UM VOLUME REQUIRED
,CE AREA REQUIRED Qu
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
Bououl
Storage
spillway
Top
N' c.a.
drydl
volume
sa. volume
5 6,050
0
0
0
t
67
71 8,946
3
4
21,736
8,560
21536
29,8%
79 10386
6
19372
49,428
-tntae Slopes g [:I
DEPTH OF STORAGE- 3 Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 1,930 Co. FL
Dimmeimu - Top Width 2%Bottom Width 1,830 Volumc Cu. Ft.
Height 3' (L I aide clopm)
Length - Baffin Storage W idlh
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED- Fig-QCu. FL
SPILLWAY HEIGHT- 4 FI
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT- 6 Ft
SPILLWAY - L - (Qo) / (3 x It' - 7 Ft Um MildmumoTlO
Spillway Flow DxgMR) -

0 0

ZAMartin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM N &0 - Rork Dam Sediment Basin Calculations
with as" B Rip Rap same
DATE: October S. 2016
BASIN 0 J
AC
Mu. 10 AC
1TUTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN
-
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN
-
A[
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSI'IY(Ito)
7.03
C= Ob0
INTENSITY (6)
Q23-CIA- 0.6 a 8.21 a 2.50 = 12.32 ch
lO-CIA- 0.6 x 7.03 x 2.50 - 10.35 Cis
MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIRED
1 2.50 1 x
1 3600
CF
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED Qta
110.551 x
1 435
SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS I.
is so.
d It
volumJjD
me
Bottom
1
3,000
0
0
Storage
Ill
A
J
11,826Spillway
136
41 5,5T6
4
5a"
Top
IM
49 7,W6
6
12,632
29,688
•huideabpm@ 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE= 3 fl
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 1,%0Cu.Ft.
Diminutions- Top Willis 2'; Botmm Width 8'
1,980 Volume Cu. F1.
Height J' (1:1 side slopes)
Length- Benin Smtage Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = =Cu. FT.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT- 4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT- 6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(0,)1(3x It") 4 Ft Use Minimum of 10'
Spillway Flow Depth(0) -

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 6 6.0 - Rock Dam Sediment Basin Calculations
with ('loss B Rip Rap Robb
DATE: October 5. 2016
BASDI0 4 TOTALDRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC Maz.10AC
TOTALDISTURBED AREATO BASIN AC
Tc- 5 MW INTENSITY (]to) - 7.03 C- 0.60
NTENSTTY (I„) - 111121
Q25-CIA- 0.6 a 9.21 z 1.20 - 5.91 cis
nin-(n A- nA . sm . ton - eoa ,L
ICE AREA REQUIRED Q10 15.06I
a
1 435
- _SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
volume acc. volume
helium
0
0
0
StorageJ
"54
7236
7236
Spillway
4
3260
IOA%
Tap
6 I
N.032
18,52N
*hV ide slopes @ 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE =
J R
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,080 Cu. Ft.
Dimensions- Top Width 2': Bonom Width S'
1.080 Volume Cu. Ft.
Haight 3'(I:1 side clops)
Length - Basin Storage Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED- _Cos. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT-
4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(QJ/(1 a It'
2 Ft
Use Minimum
of l (y
Spillway Flow Depth(a)=

Martin
Marietta
East Alalnsnce Quarry
NCSECDM N 6.0 - Back Dam Sediment Brain Calculations
wish Class B Rip Rap Bartle
b.\1II Una6cr 5, 2016
BASIN a s TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN AC MIM IS AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
lk= 9 MIN INTENSITY(h4) - 7.0 C- 0.60
INTENSTIY(6) - RL
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 9.21 a IN - 6.40 cis
010-CIA= 0.6 x 7.03 x 1.30 - 5AS ds
CE AREA REQUIRED Qia
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
sonata
Storage
Spillway
Top
N
Volume
acc. volume
"49
93
6,246
6246
4
2,89a
9.136
6 1
7,232
1 16,368
'Inside slopes (a) 2.1
DEPTH OFSTORAGE=
3 Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,080 Cu. FL
Dimeuiom= Top Wi'dssll 2'; Human Width 11'
1.080 Volume Cu. Fl.
Height 3'(1:1 side slopes)
Length = Basin Storage W idlh
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = 571M6 Cu. F,.
SPILLWAYHEIGHT=
4 It
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
(I Fs
SPILLWAY -L=(Qs)1lx hts) =
2 Ft Use Mimmumof ill'
Spillway Flow Dgdh(R)= 1

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM k 6.63 - Rork Dam Sediment Bmin fdeulation%
with Clam B Rlp Rap Baf it
DATE : October 5, HIM
BASIN 0 6 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN AC MaE 10 AT
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN JENELAC
Tr= 5 MIN 1NTENSn'Y lho) - 7.63 C- O'N
INTENSITY (IV) - uI
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 8.21 x 3.00 - 14.78 ch
nm_nA- nA , im , 3m = 1765 w
IUM VULUME REQUDUaU
!.W
x
1,r
,CE AREA REQUIRED On,
12.65
1 x
SF
BASINSTORAGEDIMEHS1ON%
I.
M se.
d th
volume
am. volume
IFmono
JOp,
6,000
D
0
0
,InraBe
112
52
3
14,736
14.7M
Spillway
116
56 6 96
d
6160
Top
IN
&1 T,936
6
14.432
35,328
oloaide
slopes ®2:1
DEFTHOFSTORAGE-
3 Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,680 Cu. Ft.
Dinmmom- Top Width 2': Bottom Width
IT
1,680 Volume
Cu. Ft.
Height 3' (1:1 side slopes)
Length - Bain Srumee Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED-
_Cu. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT-
4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT =
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(Q.)/(3 xh`5) -
5 Ft
Use Minimum
of ln'
Spillway Flow Depth(a)=

0 0

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDMN6.0-Rox Den Sediment Soon(Calculation%
with CTus B WE Rep Bamc
Il% I Oc1u6u 5, 21116
BASIN p 7 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC Mn. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
Tc- S MIN INTENSITY(lis) 7.03 C- 0.60
MTEHSITY(in)
Q2.5-CIA- 0.6 x 9.21 x 3.40 - 16.75 cfs
CE AREA REQUIRED Qln
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
I. W'
so.
It
volume
eat. volume
Bottom
100
4,500
0
0
0
Smnte
ipluwey
IC
116
3]
61
],67h
3
4
16,326
6,730
16,326
23.056
Tap
124
69
P,356
6
15,632
3P,6PP
slmlde slopes rnJ 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE =
3 Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,680 Cu. Ft.
Dimemlom- Top Wirth 2'; B9nom Width P'
1 6Nu Volume Cu. Ft.
Height T (I:1 aide sbpex)
Length = Buin Slomge Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED= 14,646['u. f1.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT=
4 1i
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
6 I'i
SPILLWAY -L-(Qs))Ox h1 t) -
6 (i 1N: Nlmmumofln'
Spillway Flow Deplh(fl)- I

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 006.0 - Rush Dam Sediment Basin CalculaBum
with Class B Rip Rap Bafllr
DATE: Oeiaher 5s 2016
BASIN0 0 TOTALDRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN 0.90 AC Mu. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN 0.90 AC
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSITY (6) — 7.03 C= 0.60
INTENSr (6) - 11.21
Qn—M- 0.6 x all x 0.90 = 4.43 cR
mn_ru- nh . ♦na . nuo San ..r.
IUM VULUME"Quismu
u.w
x
cr
kCE AREA REQUIRED Qto
3.90
4 -
SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
L W
I sA. I depth I
volummlwa
Rom
1,250 0
0
Storage
62 37
3
5,316
Spillway,
66 41
2,706 4
2,300
Top
74 49
3.626 6
6.332
elnsideslope
Q 2:1
DEPfHOFSTORAGE— 3
Ft
RGCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 930
Cu. Ft.
Dimensions — Top Width 2'; Bottum Width S'
9M
Volume Cn Fl.
Height 3' U A side slope)
Langth—Basin Ssaege Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = =Cu. Fl.
SPILLWAVHEIGHT— 4
F1
TOPOFDAM HEIGHT— 6
FI
SPILLWAY -L-(Iju)I(3 xh") - 1
n
Use Minimumofl0'
Spillway Flow Dep04B) —

0

Ugend
Drainage Area- --
elan", cells
Fine Sto
I IFS
y��n�
Pit Pvide Rock Pipeet- / Snaarct1w"S�sd r_ing pit ,ll
Protection Dud
1 Construction of Berm Dlv.. Dircbn (typ)
NCECSM S d. 6.55 will be imtdW to I ` •� +o`� -�
paaPenvdy dnin mamr into Pasa� Apc
,rer cdvc basins.
Ir
Diversion y / \ \�—°t✓
1 bitch (typ)
asin #B as in #\
AC
version 1 1.2A 1.3A('-_+�
tch (typ) Basin #4 _ » Basin #5
Divaamn Ditch" (tm)
avll be in taped to T �. Basin #b /lamposed }
—poaida¢ly dnn wscr inro / j MB
1901X 3"" RCP @ Im _ 50' Undislu
rupr<dve badm. /
Exisft Pipn ..� j / 1ss9'\c l6 fLu BRip Rap Aprvn I�� �� l Buffer
t iftkC n1d Scalcs. AFAIamance
Mart �aTletta Dr
Main Eastarry x"� ""'°°' —
MariettoDraip 4171
1 a 100 zro ,I

0

r6anrc '�� 'r *oC
2111— /%jT �N� ,
sin
St
F / _ /I � �/ t 1 �, � i f � � y
Proceslang "
& Stockpile Area
Settling Cells & Pond
Fine Storage Arm
\ o l � (j �tocm ie
1
ExistingBenn -
25'8ufferCluil
/6AC As
)
Virgina-Howling l
Duke PowCr
=f Way _ —
f ` �c -May EsItte
25' Buffer
Legend
Drainage Area - — — —
Gr en Level
East Alamance Quarry WALE: I- Ri0'
Marietta Drainage Area Map #2 a ,� e0

• 0

ro x 1
I1 i1 .1 i N(YCSM S(d.655 A III II i� \J lar� /I \�� —� rya..
oil
` 0.i
Ar
NJ
1`
akm. nxIr i Linda,liati e
Legend MMalekian_ _
Dcainugc Area - — — — / � ) )
JAMorbnEastAlamanceQuarry sc"�"
Nlarietto Drainage Area Map #3

• 0

e \ ^ Provide Rock Pipe Inlet
Protection During
Construction of Berm L
NCECSMSttd. 6.55 tz.M.So,y, p;ric. ` V
_ m
t s A 1 �penps d cwven A % L
Diversion t tY. 21'Caa IBRip Rnp Aprmi I ¢ l
Ditch (typ}'. .I Prop�se&Berm � \�
46
Proffit
I \ Provide Rock Pipe Inlet
Protection During 9r
t Construction of Berm
42 \
1 7I . NCECSM S\6.55
.:
h11�v � 'l
PutumPit I
mnoff mmnds existing pit 1of
6
I
trgme ,t J
Drainage Area - — — —_
MarUn East Alamance Quarry scue: V 200
Marietta Drainage Area Map #4 0 0o zoo - 10p

• 0

-_� I.egend
Drainage Area- ---
all
F T T
, 1
�— J
p11 � 62D AC � — �—�'� 1 �'•.�I
l III
FF
FWft
1' I
of Wi11Je F
I � I
}h)
Williwn
'1 I
)(J/Iry
�CuWen A e.m
370I U-RCP®ZMV /r t r A "•.
�aApriinIot
— n
? \
Martin East Alamance Quarry
Marietta Culvert A Drainage Area Map 0 ,W lKill) m

• Complete items t, 2. and 3. ' Iennme
• Print your name and address on the reverse Agent
m
so that we can relpthe card to you. O Aeeaaan
■ Attach this card le Me beck of the mailpleote RdaMCNesr C. qm y yy��
or on the fine If mma ace e.x. M ttrnMlnl
LLZBZ ON 31101NtlH0 II n'�ii/•Y.etr^
049 31V1S t
021tlA3100S 11tl0 03M LOGS
S-IM831VW VLL31L1VW NIlLIVW 2 12016
SN3AIN Atlf ilW
9590 9403 0730 5196 3115 04
7013 2630 0001 8998 8993

Energy, Mineral
andLmdkesourcus
6NVMONNBMT/ OVALRY
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7013 2630 0001 8998 8993
Mr. Jay Nivens
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
RE: East Alamance Quarry
Mining Permit No. 01-08
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Nivens:
•
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R.
VAN DER VAART
TRACY DAVIS
November 9, 2016
Djn
We have reviewed the modification request your company submitted for the referenced
mine site. In order for this office to complete its review of the referenced project in accordance
with GS 74-50 and 51 of the Mining Act of 1971, please provide the additional or revised
information in accordance with the following comments:
1. Provide a detailed description of the modification request. It appears there are
expansions to the pit requested that have not been included in the modification
letter.
2. Provide description of the overburden changes areas that includes overburden
placement and revegetation details. Slope drains may be needed.
3. Provide proof that yo0 have accounted for the additional volume in the basins
that will be displaced by the stone baffles.
4. Provide a Key for the Drainage Area Maps showing the basic locations within the
mine map.
5. Provide more information for the "Proposed Treatment Pond. Include dimensions
and construction details. Provide erosion and sediment control for the
construction of said pond to prevent sedimentation of Boyd's Creek.
5. Clarify the culverts labels in the "Storm Drainage Calculations". Both culverts are
labeled "A."
S dNw Qwbm I F ==W QU411 �ep'.1+1inc*I mtl Lntl Rmurtn
1612M1Smla Qnta 1619N.Uizbu SL I Ueigh Na T/699
91970CI0 T

Certified Mail
Mr. Nivens
Page Two
7. Provide a grading plan for the installation of Culvert A. Provide measures to deal
with base flow during installation.
8. Provide inlet protection for Culvert B. In addition, provide a grading plan for
installation of it, including measures for management of base flow during
installation.
9. Diversion berms must not direct runoff to sediment traps #4, #5, #7, and #8 in an
uphill manner. Diversion berms must show runoff properly directed toward the
sediment traps. Please revise.
10. Positive drainage must be provided for the temporary diversions leading to
sediment skimmer basin #2 on the south west side of the mine.
11. Provide proof that the necessary 4041401 permits have been obtained.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed. In addition, please note this office may request additional
information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
Based upon our review of the submitted project documents, the following
recommendations are offered for your consideration and do not require a response:
It may be beneficial for you to request pre -application meetings with our central and
regional staff to ensure a smoother application process.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address:
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline cannot be met and request that an
extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made to
grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's files
at the end of the 180-day period.

Certified Mail
Mr. Nivens
Page Three
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
cerely,
Judith A. Wehner
Assistant State Mining Specialist
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE

Wenner, Judy
From:
Harris, Brenda M
Sent:
Thursday, November 03, 2016 6:53 PM
To:
Boyer, Janet; Wehner, Judy
Subject:
FW: WRC Comments for Permit Renewal 01-08
Attachments:
Mining Permit Modification 01-08 East Alamance Quarry (Alamance Cc) - NCWRC.pdf
From: Garrison, Gabriela
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:01 PM
To: Harris, Brenda M [e-mail]>
Cc: Allen, Jason M [e-mail]>
Subject: WRC Comments for Permit Renewal 01-08
Hello Ms. Harris,
I have attached comments for the renewal request for East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08.
Thank you,
Gabriela
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Sandhills Depot, P.O. Boa 149
Hoffman, NC 28347
Office and Cell: 910-409-7350
ea briela.karrison(4Mcwildltfe.ore
wwww.ncwildlife.org
0101291
Email correspondence to and from this antler is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may W disclosed to third series.

a A&
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brenda M. Harris, Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
FROM: Gabriela Gartison
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
Habitat Conservation
DATE: November 3, 2016
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., East Alamance Quarry —
Permit No. 01.08, Alamance County, North Carolina
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
permit application. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Mining Act of 1971
(as amended, 1982) (G.S. 74A6 through 74-68 15 NCAC 5).
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., is requesting a modification of their permit to mine granite. Currently,
the total permitted area is 600.2 acres; the modification includes the addition of 10.5 acres, located within
the previously approved permitted boundary. Currently, process wash water from material washing is
treated through a closed -loop system; process water is not discharged off site. Mine discharge is
comprised of stomnwater runoff and groundwater seepage. This water Flows to a pit sump to be used for
replenishing the closed -loop system or the existing freshwater pond on the property. The remaining water
is discharged to Boyds Creek, where it is tested for pH, turbidity, total suspended solids and settleable
solids. The reclamation plan includes grading and revegetating the site in accordance with a seeding
schedule. The excavation areas will be allowed to fill with water for uses to be determined by the
landowner. This mine is located at 2261 Martin Marietta Drive, northeast of Burlington in Alamance
County.
Aerial images and maps indicate Boyds Creek and associated tributaries bisect the project site. A
proposed modification includes encroaching a portion of the 50-foot stream buffer, leaving only 30 feet
undisturbed; this would impact approximately 350 feet of stream channel. The changes inland use and
increased amount of impervious surfaces will likely exacerbate channel degradation and sediment impacts
to aquatic ecosystems, on account of increased stormwater runoff. In addition, pollutants (c.g., sediment,
heavy metals, pesticides and fertilizers) washed from developed landscapes can adversely affect and
extirpate species both in wetland areas and downstream of disturbed areas.
If the permit is modified, the NCWRC offers the following recommendations to minimize impacts to
aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resoerccs:
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
November 3, 2016
East Alamance Quarry
Permit No. 07-08
Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed native, forested buffer along perennial streams,
intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas
will reduce impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and improve water quality. In
addition, these buffers provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. Grassed buffers, particularly
fescue, do not provide the necessary and highly valuable functions that forested buffers provide.
Sediment and erosion control structures should be located outside of the buffers.
2. Water discharges from the site should be proportional to the size of the receiving stream.
Turbidity of the discharge should be maintained at or below the permit requirement. High water
discharge rates and turbidity can negatively impact aquatic and fisheries resources within and
downstream of the project area. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have various detrimental
effects on aquatic resources, including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs and
clogging of gills.
Consider using seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife (e.g., native warm season grasses) in
the reclamation plan. An exact seeding mixture would need to take into account soil types,
moisture, pH and degree of slope of areas to be stabilized. Relatively shallow sediment basins
can be reclaimed as wetlands where practicable. Please contact Jason Allen, District Wildlife
Biologist, at [phone] or jason.allen(a-)ncwildlife.oru for additional information regarding
reclamation for wildlife.
4. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly
recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting
that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal
twines. Silt fencing and similar products that have been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh
should be avoided as they impede the movement of terrestrial wildlife species.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit modification. If I can be of further assistance,
please call [phone] or email gabriela.garrisonancwildlife.org.
cc: Josh Turner, Mine Manager
ec: Jason Allen, NCWRC

Wehner, Judy
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 4:17 PM
To: Weimer, Judy
Cc: Gantt Matt; Leonard, Shannon
Subject: RE: 01-08 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013
Attachments: 01-08 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013-wsro-dwr.pdf
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
nothing Compares,...-.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Weimer, Judy
Sent: Friday, October 14, 201610:02 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gantt, Matt<[e-mail]>; Leonard, Shannon <[e-mail]>
Subject: 01-08 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013
Here's the review sheet for the modification of the East Alamance Quarry in Alamance County.

Pool this form M POF Retum PDF of this fomr fo DEMLR CO by email. oc DEMLR RQ DWR SPU Said a copy M the permine.
MINING PERST APPLICATION REAW FORM
forthe
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Project Name: East Alamance Quarry DEMLRPermit# 01-08 County: Catawba
Applicant's Email: [e-mail]
PERMIT ACTION TYPE modification
YES NO Date Commencina
r, F-
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? r r 1988
Latitude: 36.12851 Longitude:-79.36503
Please return comments to tat DEMLR CO): Judy Wenner
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWR:
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: Bovds Creek, WS-V, NSW
DWR Compliance Status of Mine:
Does this mine (or previous owner) have DWR back fees to pay? If yes, amount:
Is this mine an active permit in RIMS?
YES
NO
r �invertsarC rUmenhTn dilln
4111 Wetland Cert. required0
cover eir i3rlveR0inTstreams
le
r
e uireTdification
401 Wetland Cart, existing?
r f Permit #_
r _
Does DWR RO have enough Informadon to
i—,
r n if cu erts will e i
determine If a 401 certlflcatlon is re ui_r-ed1?
iurisdmaonalrtreams
YES NO
17 ,1
r
Are wetlands dis urbed at this site?
Does DWR RO suspect or know of nearby
wetlands to the site?
r
r,
—
Ruv Swntamhnr 9n1n ;

S
.
}

Pont this ro m to POP Refum PDF of this form M DEMLR Co by email cc DEMLR RO, DWR SPD Seri a wpy to the potmimee.
r,o
Is a wetland delineation required prior to
-onsultant _
r,
DWR issuing the permit?
- nsfte7 —
r ffsite?
possibly to determine the
Stream Determination Needed?
r_
need for a 401 for the
culverts
Stream Determination Completed?
a_,!
r
nknown
Does DWR RO need a statement that no
wetlands/streams are disturbed
for this project from applicant?
" ,ossibl . needed for
,Buffer DetenninatlonoNeeded?
culvert. locations. Will need'
f�1
buffer authorization for
stormwater bond In Zone 2 of
Jordan Buffer
Buffer Determination Completed?
I'Recyclesystem,permg existing?*
.Onermit #_
New Recycle System permit required?*
r
Enough information to determine?
Non -discharge permit existing?"
�ermit #
,
Does this applicant need to contact the
regional of Central DWR Office to
l-
r
determine if a State Stormwater Permit is
—
needed?
r 1Unknown.
Will wastewaters discharge to HQW waters
r
W ,7Q10
Permittee
with a 7010=0? "•
Flow:
must
—
determine.
' -
r Has Violation
r O&M Requirements
C HQW17Q10 Concerns
Does DWR .require DEMLR to hold the
r Pay back fees or renew
permit (e.g. so DWR can review it further or
DWR permit
QOther.
r
because DWR. requires more information)?
Please describe the reason to
..
hold the permit:
^_
P5con
©Hold Until:
Mine must wait to dewater until an O&M plan is
r
approved?
—
Fav Fnnfnmbl9M n

NCO
Warei-Resources
eNVIRONMEN Tsa aaRLnR
November 1, 2016
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Judy Wehner
Land Quality Section
FROM: Michael BauerGround Water Branch
Division of Water Resources
• PAT MCCRORY
w,,.m"
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
src..un
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
nm,n.
RECEIVED
Nov 01 213%
LAND QUALITY
MINING PROGRAM
SUBJECT: Comments on the Mining Permit Modification Request for:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County 9e
Please find attached a copy of the mining permit modification request for the above referenced project.
The East Alamance Quarry, located in Alamance County, does not appear to have an unduly adverse
effect on ground water supplies and has previously registered their withdrawals, with the Division of
Water Resources, as facility ID #0219-0007.
Facilities are required to register their water withdrawals in accordance with the North Carolina General
Statute G.S. 143-215.22H. This statute requires any non-agricultural water user who withdraws 100,000
gallons or more in any one day of ground water or surface water to register and update withdrawals. This
statue also requires transfers of 100,000 gallons or more in any one day of surface water from one river
basin to another river basin to register and update their water transfers. Water withdrawal registrants must
complete the annual water use reporting form by April 1 for the previous year. The registration form may
be obtained from the following link:
http://www.newater.org/Permits_and_Regisimlion/Water_Withdmwal_and_Tmnsfer Registration.
If you have further questions regarding the water withdrawal registration please contact John Barr with the
Division of Water Resources at [phone] or email him at john.barr rQr ncdenr.gov.
State af?4 MCmim I Quality I Water lts u %
1611 Mvl,mi¢Ceeur aalvi9C NRM Caolina ir6941611
9191UJ9W0

Energy. Mineral
and Land Resources
..VweNN9.T.L QUALITY October 14, 2016
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water R/es�our�ceess,
FROM: Brenda M. Harris
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for MMM
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
• PAT MCCRORY
air
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
SUMIm.9
TRACY DAVIS
u,T.mr
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatedng Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by November 4,
2016 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Ibmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt
hbu orNonh Cmhv I1!mir9w„swal Qsliry I a,sI MwsJ a 2snd Rmwas
1612M®Ike Cesar I512N, Uivbq SL I IIAJA}t NC22699
919hD92w r

Wishner, Judv
From:
Gantt, Matt
Sent:
Friday, October 21, 2016 12:03 PM
To:
Weimer, Judy; Boyer, Janet
Subject:
East Alamance Quarry (01-08)
Judy and Janet,
I have reviewed the permit modification for the East Alamance Quarry (01-08) and have the following comments:
1. More information is needed for the "Proposed Treatment Pond". No dimensions or design calculations were
included with this submittal. This information needs to he included as part of the modification request. Also,
during the construction of the pond, silt fence will be needed at the base of the fill for the basin to prevent any
sedimentation into Boyd's Creek. Completed slopes of the basin need to be covered with erosion control
matting after the berm of the basin has been seeded.
2. On the "Storm Drainage Calculations" worksheet. Both culverts are referred to as "Culvert A". This needs to be
amended to note two different culvert pipes.
3. It appears that some grading will need to take place to install "Culvert A" since the outlet of the pipe is not
within the contour of the "Permitted Stream Disturbance" Eithera pump around system or a temporary flume
pipe will need to be used to get the base flow of the stream around the construction area during
installation. Any additional grading within the stream channel will also need to be shown on the map.
4. Pipe inlet protection needs to be shown at the inlet of "Culvert B". In addition, depending on the amount of
flow being directed toward "Culvert B", a pump around or temporary flume pipe may need to be used during
pipe placement. See item #3 above.
S. Diversion berms are shown directing runoff to sediment traps #4, 45, #7, and #8 In an uphill direction (i.e., from
the 590 to the 598 contour for sediment trap 118, etc.). Perhaps the four sediment traps could he shown
excavated into the slopes around the proposed "Culvert B", allowing runoff to enter the traps at the desired
elevation. Diversion berms must show runoff properly directed toward the sediment traps.
6. Positive drainage must be provided for the temporary diversion leading to sediment skimmer basin #2 on the
southwest side of the mine. Currently, runoff is being directed toward the basin from the 550 contour down to
the 548 contour and backup to the 550 contour. One option to achieve positive drainage would he to truncate
the "proposed berm" at the 550 contour. The diversion could then be ran along the 550 contour into the west
side of sediment skimmer basin #2.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thanks,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Lard Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9800 office
336-776-9654 mobileldirect
[e-mail]
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NO 27105

Kro-: "Nothing Compares.-.... •
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

��/^MINING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
Applicaru's Name: Mm ProjectName: gad) IQMM Qe(t�
Applic./Permit No: OI'Ob Coumy: �r�moll� Date Receivek io
Reviewer: Rion Basin Name: /jat . VU
❑ New ❑ Renevml ,K M (cation (inside permit boundaries)
❑ Modifuatim(outside permit boundaries), ❑ Tramufer �Ijekase
Ind/ U�
❑ Partial Release ❑ Additional lnfommlion ❑ Fee Needed. .Fee Received: o i)D�
Pk ro'utle mtireappF,atim pachage to:
al0 (s omplee vpievsuach the"LQ; Rgwnd Office Mining AWioston Review
(Sahga"maa mRl' mdatach bs A"D DWR' gong Applionion Review Form" m she other aprmd led otpa to the Regmad
Engineer) ��)
DWc. Routed I B l dflc Redd IO / / /&
ErDivisim of Water Resources Date: Routed Rec'd /
yy NC Wildlife Resowces Commission Date: Routed Rec'd-71—
❑ US Fish v Wildlife Service Date: Routed Redd
((My now aWkaoim ad mallficanon equees that add lard m the permi)
Pkm route first a tmees of the application and ono location moos to
❑ Division of Parks a Recreation Date: Routed Redd
❑ NC Geological Survey Section Date: Routed Rec'd
❑ Division of Marine Fisheries Date: Routed Redd
❑ Division of Soil N Water Conservation (plus LEA) Date: Routed Rec'd
(Only ones app'. ' and modifaatimurrqunastha add lard to the pewit)
❑ Division of Archives b History Date: Routed Rec'd
(Orly pear applimes)
❑ Other. Date: Routed Reed
** Suspense Date for Comments: 1 I (no Into, than ay dogs from receipt)
❑ Please note the following: (�/lj/j
(f) �1 Llk!/il Ili(

• •
PAT MCCRORY
c
Kra
DONALD R.
VAN DER VAARTART
Energy, Mineral
sdcv y
andLwdResources
TRACY DAMS
ENVIRONMRNTAL QUALITY
October 14, 2016
Wisner
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Gabriela Garrison
Habitat Conservation Program Coordinator
Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Brenda M. Harris lb)Io�
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Miningg Permit Modification for MMM
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for the
above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having unduly
adverse effect on wildlife and freshwater fisheries (G.S. 74.51 (2)). Please respond by November 4,
2016 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review all proposed erosion and sediment control measures to ensure that they are
sufficient to restrain erosion and off -site sedimentation. However, any comments your agency can
provide regarding effects on wildlife and freshwater fisheries would be greatly appreciated. If your
staff wishes to perform a site inspection, it is recommended that they contact the person submitting
this request to set up a convenient date and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the
person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW COMMENTS
TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at (919)
707-9220 if you have any questions.
/bmh
Attachments
cc: Mr: Matt Gantt
Sum dllw 0a9tioe I waesw ouNry I Srad. M "W Led RcsIxncs
1612 h1ki& IXCeuta I 512N. WjWn, SL I MMrLNCZ7e99
919907nN T

• •
PAT MCC RORY
CGo.smw
III
DONALD R.
VAN DER VAART
Energy, Mrnand
s�Nmy
arWLandReso "s
TRACY DAVIS
INVIROMNiMbA OWLI"
October 14, 2016
Dlrt<Iw
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Nat Wilson
Hydrogeology Group
Division of Water Resources
FROM: Brenda M. Harris /K;j v
Mining Program Secretary
Land Quality Section
SUBJECT: Mining Permit Modification for MMM
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
® Mine Dewatering Proposed ❑ No Mine Dewatenng Proposed
Please find attached for your review a copy of the mining permit modification request for
the above referenced project.
Please review this information and advise as to the probability of this operation having
unduly adverse effect on potable water supplies (GS 74-51 (2). Please respond by November 4,
2016 so that we may complete our review of this request within our statutory time limits.
As is the case in our review of all mining permit applications, renewals and modifications, this
office will carefully review, any comments your agency can provide regarding potential effects on
potable groundwater supplies and groundwater quality will be appreciated. We would like to
have any recommendations you may provide for permit conditions, for reasonable protection of
groundwater quantity or quality. If your staff wishes to perform a she inspection, it is
recommended that they contact the person submitting this request to set up a convenient date
and time. Also, please send a copy of your comments to the person noted in the application.
RETURN ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS AND MAPS WITH YOUR REVIEW
COMMENTS TO THIS OFFICE.
Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact Ms. Judy Wehner at
[phone] if you have any questions.
/bmh
Attachments
cc: Mr. Matt Gant[
Smn ofNm om I snwwmww Pltlib l Ho .M1fmm. l d]oven
1612M 1Sf w Ceetm 1512 N. SWLbw Sl.lS eta NC 27699
919 707 920 T

Wehner, Judy
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:01 AM
To: Homewood, Sue
Cc: Gantt, Matt; Leonard, Shannon
Subject: 01-08 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013
Attachments: 01-08 DWR REVIEW SHEET 2013.doc
Here's the review sheet forthe modification of the East Alamance Quarry in Alamance County.

Pnnt this corm to PDF Retum`OF�of this him to DEMLR CO by email. cc DEMLR RO, DWR SPU send a copy to the perMttee.
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION RAEW FORM
for the
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Project Name: East Alamance Quarry DEMLR Permit # 0"S County: Catawba
Applicant's Email: Jay. [e-mail]
PERMIT ACTION TYPE modification
YES NO Date Commencing
rr rr
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? F r r r 1988
Latitude: 36.12851 Longitude:-79.35503
Please return comments to (at DEMLR CO): Judy Wishner
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWR:
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water quality?
Comments:_
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification:
DWR Compliance Status of Mine:
Does this mine (or previous owner) have DWR back fees to pay? If yes, amount:
Is this mine an active permit in BIMS?
YES NO
ao1 Wetlan 6e . req I e?
r r
r
401 Wetland Cart existing?
r r Permit #_
r r_
Does BWR RO have enough informs ion mi
determine If a 0. certjflca Ion is re uiMg'
r r
r
YES NO
Are etland8 dls bed at his sl e7
r t
r r
Does DWR RO suspect or know of nearby
r r
r r
wetlands to the site?
—
rr p
Is a wetland delineation required prior to
r •onsultant
r t
DWR Issuing the permit?
_
r( nsi et?
R.' s.womm.r shin

Print this form to PDF Return PDF of this form to DEMLR CO by email. oo DEMLR R0, DWR SPU SeM a copy 0 the permlttee.
.( ffsite?_ qW
Stream Determination Needed?
F-
r (
, Stream Determination Completed?
r (
r
Does DWR RO need a statement that no
wetlandsistreams are disturbed
for this project from applicant?
Buffer Determination Needed?
.. _
r(
r(
Buffer Determination Completed?
r(
I—(_
Recycle system permit existing?*
I— r ermit #—
r
New Recycle System permit required?'
I— (
r
Enough information to determine?
Non -discharge permit existing?*
EIRermit
Does this applicant need to contact the
regional of Central DWR Office to
determine If a State Stormwater Permit is
—
needed?
r (Unknown.
Will wastewaters discharge to HOW waters
7 t
I—(7010
Permittee
with a 7010=07 "
Flow:
must
determine.
Has Violation
&M Requirements
H((
HOW17010 Concerns
Does DWR require DEMLR to hold the,
Pay back fees or renew
permit (e:g. to DWR can review It'further`or
DWR permit
©Other.
(—(
`
.because DWR requires more Informationj?
Please describe the reason to
hold the permit: —
O contact: —
f ( Hold Until:..
Mine must wait to dewater until an O&M plan is
r (
r
approved?
—
Reviewed by;
DWR RO Surface Water:_ Regional Office: — Date: —
RO Aquifer Protection Section: — Regional Office: — Date: _
Rav c.rnwmhm omn

.•
•
IAMartin
Marietta
Transmittal Letter
Martin Marietta
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
(P) 704-409-1475 (F) 704-527-9283
TO:
NCDEQ - Energy Mining Land Resources
512 N Salisbury Street - 5th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604-1170
attention:
Judy Wishner
Re:
East Alamance Quarry Mine Permit
Modification
W are sending you
Drawings
�I Prints
�I Letter
H Change Order
Plans
Reproducible
For Approval
Approved as Submitted LI Resubmit copies for approval
For Your Use
Approved as Noted
As Requested
Returned for Corrections
0omments.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further information.
6opy to:
10/11/16
Sig tur

Ah
Marie • VENDOR W
Marietta
PO. p%30013 MLE111H, NORTH CAROLINA 27622d013 158632
"' DATE:
I CHECK NO.
1726013
10105116
.DATE
INVOIQEICREDIT
OROSSAMT.
ADJ.DESC
DISCOUNt
'..NETAMDUNT
09SWIS
1666526632]083016
1,000.W
EASTALAMANCEMINEPER
1,000.00
THE ARACRE ,CHECK I3 M PAWKW
M R IT SIDE ue6CKIE Eo
ADM
TOTAL:
1,000.00
1,000.00
CHECK NO. 01726013
YI`+`t•CMEOK',AMOUNTO �`'„
3""'1A00,00
PA,,,,Y��TO
NCDENR
�Ep ?
LAND QUALITY SECTION
^,.
1612 MAIL SERVICE CTR
P77 +ia"B
RALEIGH NO 27699.1612
j

Martin
Marietta
October 11, 2016
Ms. Judy Wehner
RECEIVED
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDEQ-Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
OCT 14 20M
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
LAND QUALIT-y
MINING PROGRAM
RE: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry, Permit No. 01-08
Mine Permit Modification
Dear Ms. Wehner:
This is a letter requesting the Mine Permit modification for our East Aaamance Quarry located at
2261 Martin Marietta Drive in Burlington, INC. The proposed modifications to the currently
approved plan are:
• New property information has been incorporated into this mine plan. The property
depicted on this plan is the same as the previously permitted property. The minor
adjustment in total acreage is based on more accurate property data
• The proposed impacts to the previously approved 50' stream buffer for the new lease„^,F
area. Thisencroachmentwill encroach into the 50' Undisturbed Buffer approximately pt
20' leaving a 30' undisturbed buffer. This encroachment will run for approximately
350' along the stream channel.
• A portion of the proposed berm construction in the southwest comer of the project has
been removed due to spatial constraints.
• Culvert "A" & "W have been redesigned based on better available topographic
information.
• The erosion control basins have been redesigned to meet the current development
standards.
• We request to use rip tap baffles en lue of coir fiber baffles in the proposed erosion
control basins. The information on this request has been included in the package.
I have included the Mine Permit Application, Mine Permit Modification Fee, Updated Mine
Map, USGS Exhibit Map, Roadway Map, Drainage Area Maps and Erosion Control Design
)lease
cularions.
feel free to contact me at [phone] or atjay.nivens@martimmarlettacom should
have any questions or need any additional information.
east alamance mine permit renewal coverletter.docx

9 •
1AMartin
Marietta
7Jay7tvens
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
8701 Red Oak Blvd. Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
east alamance mine permit renewal coverletter.docx

•
Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry Mine Modification Submittal
• Mine Application
• USGS Exhibit
• Roadway Exhibit
• Stream Buffer Encroachment Detail
Engineering Calculations
• Erosion Control Basin Design Calculations
• Culvert "A" & "B" Storm Drain Calculations
• Drainage Area Maps
• Class B Rip Rap Baffle Design Information

vp. • •
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
1. Name of Mine East Alamance Ouarry County Alamance
River Basin Care Fear
Latitude (decimal degrees to four places) 36.128515
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places) - 92 ,355027
2. Name of Applicant* Martin Marietta Materials. Inc.
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 2710 Wvcliff Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] Alternate No.
4. Mine Office Address 2261 Martin Marietta Drive Burlington, NC 27217 Telephone [phone]
5. Mine Manager Josh Turner
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application arc true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature Date
Print Name John . T beri
Title Pres d t Mid- tic Division
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
•" The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of complete ap lication or, if public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental in required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING • RMIT •
NOTE: All of the following questions most be thoroughly answered regarding your mining operation for
t t1 a intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding, detailed mine
map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
1. Answer all of the following that apply:
❑ If this is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by
the permit (this is the acreage t 7t a "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
❑ If this is an a placation for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total reverall) acreage cove a Tay the existing permit: Mining Permit No.:
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon):_
® If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage coverey the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: 010108 Total permitted acreage: 600.2
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ® No ❑. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): 10.5 Acres
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes No ®. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modi nation: . (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any Portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.:
disturbed, and cover removed)) b the mming operanon7 Yes No If no, a
"minor modification" fee of $I OR.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage t (be added).
If yes, indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the rmit (the total
acreage to be added to the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" face will be based
upon):
❑ If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage"w'VEMYy the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: Total permitted acreage:
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO BE
PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Granite
3. Mining method:
eHydraulic Dredge ® Front-end Loader & Truck ❑ Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper
Other (explain):
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 500
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (eg., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
Natural Ground
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 400

WF,
-APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
•
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes ® No
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? Currently being mined by Martin Marietta
Materials
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum):
F11573 :f
Clearly mark and label the location of pour mining operation on 6 copies of a 7.5-minute
quadrangle and a county highway map. These maps, in addition to six %copies or
all mine maps and
reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-minute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailine Address: Physical Address:
1612 Mail Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 5" Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
www.eeoloey.em.state.nc.us/
County highway maps may be obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
1 adiinng®dddresg:
NCDU GIS Unit
1597 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
www.nedot.orvJit/aisContut/default.htmI
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial pphotographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining wants can
only he issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps must
be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, gf
a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
gg Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
Location and acreagge of all Manned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
I. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
in. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of I00-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.

,APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT •
p. Names of owners of record, both. public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary which lie directly across and are Contiguous to any highway, creek,
stream, river,. or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining
permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that
has four lanes of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE MAP SCALE
0-49 Acres 1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres 1 inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres I inch — 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)

-APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT •
A tabletchart must be provided on the minema that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
See Map
Processing Area/Stockpile Area
See Map
Wastepiles
See Map
Haul Roads
See Map
ation
See Map
er Areas)
R
See Map
bed Acreage
See Map
NOTE:
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUES TIONSISTA TEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM). THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE
MAPS.

APPLICATION FOR A MINISPERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference
the sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
Overburden material and sap rock present above the hard rock will be removed. The rock is drilled and
blasted to produce a product that can be transported to the plant for processing, From there, the raw
material is crushed and screened to produce desired products. A construction sequence of land
disturbing activities is provided on the Mine Map, specifically as it relates to sediment and erosion
control. Maintenance and stabilization efforts will be conducted as noted and as required in the mining
act.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specs rc plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s), waste Iles, access/mine roads an process areas), and give a detailed sequence of
installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion
control measures on the mine map(s) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details of each
measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any proposed
measures.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed in accordance with the Mine Map and
construction details. These measures will be installed prior to disturbing the area they are designed to
protect. The construction sequence indicates the steps that will be taken to maintain all of the sediment
and erosion control measures. Temporary diversions.are provided to direct all surface runoff through
the sediment basins. Design calculations are provided on the Mine Map to support the dimensions and
construction of the proposed sediment basins. The majority of runoff from the property will be
maintained internally, either from the pit or the existing sediment basins. Any proposed changes that
are not included on the Mine Map will be submitted to the Division of Land Resources for approval.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water
handling? Yes 2 No ❑. If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
Process wash water from material washing is treated through a closed -loop system within the settling
cells. The system operates as a closed circuit with no discharge of process water off -site. The system is
further described in the General NPDES permit issued to the mining industry and specifically, NPDES
Permit #NCG020029 for this facility.
b, Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yes 0 No ❑. If yes, briefly describe the nature of the discharge
and locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine
map(s).
Water discharged as a result of mine dewatering is comprised of storm water runoff and groundwater
seepage. This water will gravity flow to the pit sump for clarification prior to discharge. Water
collected in the pit will be used to replenish the closed -loop system or replenish the existing fresh
water pond on the property. Any accumulated water that is not needed, will be discharged through
the approved outfall location, specifically Outfall 001 shown on the Mine Map. Outfall 001 discharges
into Boyds Creek. Discharge water from the outfall will be tested for pH, Turbidity, Total Suspended
Solids, and Settleable Solids; in accordance with the requirements of General NPDES Permit
requirements to ensure that water quality standards are met.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT •
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the w,r table? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes ® No u.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal
rate in gallons per day: 0.40 MGD . Locate all existing wells on the mine
mop(s) that lie within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any
conclusions or statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and
current water withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water
system or private wells.
The close proximity of the rock to the surface of the ground and the low level of permeability of the
rock in the quarry area indicate that the quarry development will have no detrimental impact on any
wells in the area.
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) from
the Division Nailer Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to register
water use with the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than R , gallons
per day and needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if the operation lies in
a capacny use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
The process is described in the General NPDES permit issued to the mining industry and specifically,
NPDES Permit No. NCG020029 for this facility. This permit authorizes the discharge of storm water,
process water, and mine dewatering to the surface waters of North Carolina.
4. a. Will the operation involve crashing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
The NC Division of Air Quality has issued air Permit No.06132 for this facility.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Fugitive dust from the processing plant, stockpiles, etc. will be controlled through the use of a wet
suppression system within the operating plant. A large water truck will be used to control the dust on
the haul roads, pit area and within the stockpile area. A large portion of the annual production will
consist of washed stone, which generates little dust.
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-
of-way. It may be an =excavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions.
Note that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit
boundary or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a
wider buffer maybe needed depending on site conditions. Show all buffer locations and widths
on the mine map(s).
The approved unexcavated buffers as shown on the Mine Plan along the mining permit boundary
will be provided and maintained at this site. Along with the permit boundary buffers, overburden
berms are/will be provided to visually shield the operation from the adjoining neighbors. The Mine
Map clearly depicts all buffers and proposed berms that will be located at the site.
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet
may be needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINIIPPERMIT •
may be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within
the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all
buffer locations and widths on the mine map(s).
Existing streams within the permit boundary will have a 50' undisturbed buffer.
6. a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
minimum 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
To assure slope stability adjacent to adjoining properties during mining, slope and excavation
configurations will take into account structural geology, rock mechanics, and mining engineering
considerations. Final excavation grades for all unconsolidated overburden material will be on a
3:1 minimum slope around the outer quarry perimeter from natural ground to the top of bedrock.
Further, a minimum ten -foot (10') wide safety bench will be provided at the base of any cut slope
and the top of bedrock in this same area.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s) for all fill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburden
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any
benches and/or slope drains (with supporting design information) if needed, and the method of
final stabilization.
See construction details on the attached mine map.
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be
provided on the mine map(s).
Final excavation slopes of unconsolidated materials along the outer quarry perimeter will be
graded on a 2:1 minimum slope from natural ground and will extend to a minimum of six feet (6')
below the anticipated water level. Internal slopes will be graded on a 1.5:1, or flatter where such
areas are anticipated to be above the final water elevation. A minimum ten. -foot (I0') wide safety
bench will be provided at the base of any cut slope around the quarry perimeter where such areas
are anticipated to be above the final water elevation.
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
A typical pit cross-section is provided on the Mine Map. The first bench is largely controlled by
the existing topography. Lower benches will be consistent of the typical 40' vertical heights and
10' horizontal bench widths between each level.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
All structures within the vicinity of the existing mine excavation are indicated on the Mine Map. With
the exception of any proposed on -site support facilities, the closet neighboring occupied structure is
located greater than three hundred (300') from the future pit excavation. Blasting activities will be
designed and monitored to ensure that vibration and air blast standards are not exceeded.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder

-APPLICATION FOR A MINIVPERMIT •
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
The highwall area of the quarry will be "barricaded" by the use of earthen berms, fencing, oversized
boulders, or a combination of these items to prevent inadvertent public entry. A ten -foot (10') wide
horizontal safety bench will also be provided between the top of the bedrock and the toe of any excavated
cut slopes around the outer quarry perimeter.
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No ®.
If yes, how will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or
other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine maps) and provide cross -
sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
Existing trees, terrain, and visual berms will effectively screen the majority of our operation from
public view. Trees and vegetation will be planted as needed to promote future long-term screening
and soil stability.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
None known to be present.
11. Will explosives be used? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Depending on the mine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information may be
required on the blasting program (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest offsite
occupied structure(s) to the proposed excavation(s) on the mine map and indicate its approximate
distance to the proposed excavation.
ANFO (ammonium nitrate and fuel oil) and water -based emulsions are the primary -blasting agents used.
Blasting will be conducted under the direction of experienced and qualified personnel. Blasts will be
monitored at all times by seismograph to ensure that vibration and air blast levels are within the guidelines
set by the State. Shot patterns will be designed in consideration of the geological environment, (i.e., faults,
fractures, and lithology) maximize material breakage, and prevent any physical hazards to persons or
neighboring property. Blast designs will also be based upon the distance to the nearest dwelling from the
blast site and the weight of explosives per blast interval (pounds detonated per eight (8) millisecond delay),
which will consistently yield predictable blast vibration levels well within all regulatory limits at subject
structures. Records of each blast will be maintained, and will include pertinent data such as the number of
holes, pattern, delay intervals, depth and size of holes, type and total pounds of explosives, maximum
pounds per delay interval, amount of stemming and burden for each hole, and blast location. Blast and
seismograph records will be kept in a NCDENR approved blasting guidelines format.
12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
Indicate the location(s) ofall storage facilities on the mine map(s).
Fuel oil, waste oil and gasoline will be stored in aboveground tanks located within adequately
sized containment structure(s). A Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC Plan) has
been prepared for the facility, which details the procedures to be followed in the event of a spill.

APPLICATION FOR A MINAPERMIT •
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
l . Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or
establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other
pollution. This information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with
the information provided on the mine map(s). In addition, design information, including typical
cross -sections, of any permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the
location(s) of all permanent channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Reclamation of disturbed areas will be an ongoing part of the operating plan. Disturbed areas will be
graded and revegetated in accordance with the seeding schedule as provided.
At such time as the decision is made to terminate operations at this site, all remaining disturbed areas will
be graded, seeded and stabilized. The excavation will be allowed to fill with water providing a large lake
for water storage, supply, recreation, or othe� use to be determined by the landowner.
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross-section(s) through the proposed body(s) ofwater. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes ❑ No ®.
If yes, specify species.
The pit and supply lake will remain as permanent water impoundment use. The average depth of water in
the pit will be determined by the ultimate depth of the pit at the time operations are terminated, but in no
case will be less than a six foot (6') minimum depth. The stocking feasibility with fish will be left to the
discretion of the landowner and the future plans once mining has stopped.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
A minimum ten -foot (14') wide safety bench will remain along the top bench around the entire pit. A
perimeter fence will be placed around all excavations upon completion of the mining operation unless
alternate plans for the property are pre -approved through the Division of Land Resources.
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine
waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for
such areas must be provided on the reclamation map.
Overburden will be utilized to grade/construct internal roads and as fill material for perimeter screening
berms. All fill slopes will be stabilized/seeded once complete.
Overburden, refuse, spoil banks, or other mine waste areas existing at final reclamation will be graded and
compacted to slopes of 2:1 or flatter and will be vegetated in accordance with the seeding schedule. All
areas will be graded to provide positive drainage and stabilized to prevent erosion.
S. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT •
All processing facilities will be dismantled. Salvageable equipment will be hauled off -site for use at
other Martin Marietta operations. Equipment that cannot be reused will be disposed/recycled in
accordance with all local, State, and Federal regulations. Stockpiles will be removed, and the affected
area graded to conform to surrounding topography. These areas will then be scarified and revegetated.
Haul roads and roadways not necessary for future development will also be scarified and revegetated
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes ® NoEl.
Ifyes, Wean such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and
d(Ich line stabilization.
The main haul road and service roads will remain for vehicular access to the lake formed by the pit.
These roads shall be stabilized while the quarry is active. Other roads to remain will be determined
by the future use of the site after operations have ceased.
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables,
or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off -site eenerated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without orior written approval
from the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and
either the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit
has been issued by DWM for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application.
All temporary andpermanent re se disposal areays must be clear! delineated on the mine map(s) and
reclamation map, along with, hst of items to be disposed in said areas.
No off -site generated waste will be allowed on -site. Waste products generated through typical
quarrying activities (i.e. scrap metal, cables, drill steel, etc.) may be disposed on -site in a designated
area but will typically be removed by a local scrap metal dealer. All other waste products such as
batteries, used oil, junked equipment, etc. will be recycled and/or disposed of off -site by private
collection firms.
7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for year-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and
type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings
is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from: .
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment and
Drized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service,
alists and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest
arces at North Carolina State University;
t Carolina licensed landscape architects;
to consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
'onment and Natural Resources;
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
s as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre): According to soil tests, or 3,000 lb./acre
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre): According to soil tests,
or apply 10-10-10 at a rate of 500 lbs./acre.
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT •
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre):[NOTE: Include Legumes] Will follow schedule from NC Surface Mining
Manual.
Seed Tvoes: Seedine Dates: Seedine Rates:
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF
ANCHORING:
Apply 4,000 — 5,0001bs./acre grain straw or an equivalent cover of another suitable mulching material.
Anchor mulch by tacking with asphalt, roving, or netting.
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS —TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Virginia or Labially pines will be planted as needed to improve area screening.
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature NC Surface Mining Manual
Print Name
Agency

APPLICATION FOR A MINIMPERMIT •
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S.
74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to
carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant
to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
APPLICANT:
Signature:Zimble')
- Signature:*
Print NamPrint Name: oh I. Tib(Title,fa
Company: Martin Marietta Materials. Inc. Title: President Mid -Atlantic Division
Address: 2710 Wvcliff Road Company: Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Raleivh. NC 27607 Mine Name: East Alamance Ouarry
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed: /t� . Q,� //a Date Signed: _ /D . 6.3 /l
*Signature most be the same m the individual who signed Page I of this application.
cneca or money o
must be sent to h
application form,
e tsee next page for tee scneaute) in me
rtment of Environment and Natural Re:
at the address listed on the front cover
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
(9 9) 733-4574.

��, Eaet nladance '

t- East Alamance Quarry
J Y
9
Green revel 3{`
ILI
East Alamance Quarry
2261 Martin Marietta Drive
Burlington, NC 27215
MCrth East Alamance Quarry
Marietta Roadway Map

30' Stream -
Undiambed Proposed
i Buller Remaining To mem Pond
i
I_ � — 50' Stream Buller
� 1 1 Su=m buffer measured from a iodng top of book �� n
(dam East Alamance Quarry
Marietta Stream Buffer Encroachment

Martin Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
Engineering Calculations

c
CU B
AANo
rth
r�orietto
8701 ReE Oak aNE.
Clvl , NC 28217
Storm Drainage Calculations
Rmla+ : Fast Alamance Quarry
000©oo�oaoloo�m�m�rna�
rs•Illll��m���mm��a������ti•
Culvert A Rip Rap Apron Sizing Calculations
NC ,mant aM Eroaon Co "eYasla TYOegE(appa 5.0.5)
!ka a
CwrenA N 115 1 f 1f N R
C.,e"A m 11a ] r 1f y Ls
INHAO161e:18w
•

AoOAMartin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 116.63 - Rock Dam Sediment Betio Calculations
with Class B Rip Rap Haf0e
DATE Oeloher 5, 2016
BASIN 1 TOTALDRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC Vs\.10 u
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN - AC
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSITY(ho) = 7.03
INTENSITY D2s1 = 8.21
Q25 - CIA- 0.6 x 9.21 x 2.60 - 12.81 d
.CE AREA REQUIRED Qta 110.971 x 1 435 L41j71 sl
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS L W e.a. dolh volumc ncc. volume
Bolcom
Storage
Spillway
Top
80
93
39200 0
52 3
0
11,976
0
11 976
96
1 56 15,3761 4
15,080
17056
104
1 64 16,6561 b
112,032
29,088
-mswe slopes to [: i
DEPTH OF STORAGE- ht
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 1,3841 Cu. Ft.
Dimensions= Tap Width 2'; Bottom Width r 1,390 Volume Cu. Ft.
Height 3' (1:1 side slopes)
Length = Basin Stomgc Length
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED= _Cu. Ft
SPILLWAY HEIGHT- 4 F1
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT = 6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(Qss)1(3x It") = 4 F1 Use Minimum of 10'
Spillway Flow Depth(B)= 1

kNtyetto
NCECSM N C61- SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN CALCULATIONS
Mier and Barrel
DATE: nnral»u
nASINx a3r.. n[.Y RI AC 30M
Taum AMn.WeAmuux Ac
Tt= S Ma: MIFNSrtTllxl lA C- Oro
M]ENlrrrtlal • R31
(]A4 OR Ix 1911 13m
I"
IR.
Ox' M " ix TAl Ilm
i. MIN [M1
q,-1 mil OR 1A SdI Fix illsm
I. JW74 i,r.
Ma1MUM VOLUeBR REO
t I]!0 IW
CP
SURFACE ARIA REWIRED Ow
M9[ Y!
SF
RASINSWRAMO[MFMWNS
L
W
6wf,
M,om.
Wlm
]IAU
D
fl9r[!. :l3
II'
3
a.TM M.W*
]]0
IT
)l Mq
3)4M I31 W
TOP I ]N
11 IH
:9.014
6
3t1a 49.W
'MUMYBps4. 3:1
NERHOFSMRAOF-
3 n
MILK IMMR VOLUME RF3R3['rMJN
IW f1.n.
IMmua.- Tap WiED'_':Hwm WWSr
IMO
Yakima
1. P.
HuFAI 'Ol ash ngwl
I,mPn=Pale Slme, LMah
NTWAOF VOLUME PROVIpm•
_LF
SPILLWAY RESIST
Q
I OP OF DAM HERRIT
e
SPILLWAY-L-(O... l(L9"1 -
19 R Um Mmm eorM
SpiOxW Flmr hpMR!= I
FAIrelaR Skimmer Speriflmbm
1mm.mnm�.M11a-xY
_
W[xmx*IMU
Vdm[
v NW Nmmwn S.]
e3.664
NRmmmn�in..IR.mma a•
1
91.9e
Principle SpIIIwry CaknlalMM
Pnmple Spillvry t'ap[q ]-rr PN Mr P+4eu \unJNM1 el
SglP,o 5ialxmel
Mwmmmwv
MI'M; NPiIIwry
qN m
4 &
RIM III
IOUII 1nne Topa(MvmRmnYmq SPllwry
_n
1-p
llim
nml OmiMn Cnp[cilY
9]9 [6
a
7
W1
Hurt)Aar 13' M..imam
M.WAm.
3.14
depa.sMai- U•Rlw.r
R.PYM Am
r.]I
EImIMAm
411
APmmmOe Wme LmylM1
_n
Buo)r[q Gkul[1bn.
Gm rJ F.ra Rini Nnc RIM
HnReu W10 OWMrp h N. WA
3153
an
W.,,,d F.m D K, I molA. Wtlle. A"At MCmm prh
A, 11361
T)l
M
Ballast Dlnxmba[
1W
1qn
WI® Dq.O NMIa
n n

Martin
Krietto
NCECSM 0"1- SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN CA IATIONS
River and Barrel
DATE OWMea RA
RAMAI SFm.nl.in AC WAC AL DISMRBM UATOnW AC
Te-f MIN MTER6rfYNre1 LO t oW
MTENSMOD) ul
Qn' cU.I 06 h III ljq.M Af lea,
Qr.- CO -I Ob jx 7.63 jx IAN Rb laa
Q,-I MI L6 Ix 15.0 1, 119.fO Alf efr
A IME REW IREO
19-tl
(Y
SURFACE AREAREQVIREp Qn
EESS
SF
RASMSTORAOEWMENSMNS
L
W
whim sx. edme
Ymn
Mm m
6RR t
q
•Yme/RTIs/¢ 3:1
Ofl'IN 04 RTg1A0E-
) n
Um OAF".. VOLUME REDUCOON
SN9 N.M.
Em,mm, TW WNW, 2': Bnw M'ilm R'
1M5
vWwme
N. F.
I l l' I I I %ih M.lml
Ig1A- Feel M1,4e I"Uh
fTgUOFVOl,UME9ROVIOFO-
�t
SPILLWAYNEpM-
f
TOPOFMMHWM•
6
SPILLWAY L-(QhgLpr) -
3] n UmmA =Of!li
spul"Flry Ogmnl- I
FalrCIWb Skimmer SWIMACION
Vawenf R.un u Mue
_
Em"I'm IQP)
vawe
mpp."weiam 5'
3
65.5f
Aimmn lMptt Mmmm 4.
S
M.NS
PnoeloksquW.y W
aq,- Ne
Illmmry r.551m.Imsuusm6Neal
11"mol VIllmay
)
made Sspll
Ummw
_IN
Mcmmllmsnuopak.Pmy
A.tS erR
Ra9M Rlmmfmryrnp Spllm4'
tin
xiSEA gm._Imi
Dee Cm
wl Oeuye CymenS
66,61 ep
a
M.9
Rvni ti,m l5-M...rmm
IUm Am•
l91
_Ym
Am
- II Rrcie
Eepam Am
736
PonM1OAm
%Q
)vmmmae R.ul I"A
�n
Bmymey cakmmm
U,... Fume Rum Am.Rw
NYEYa Wi/H riWSmMCyR(63A)
SMS
M
Brunvve ia[e ppB[IyNt9AMaW�lAlafCmmepmh RR56)
AEA
ly
III.
Name Dlmenbm
9
SIWO
PM! Dpn Arm,,
n
IF) m
l6l
I]]
y1 zA
o
5
0
IWil6
0
If0.]Ih
lu
)91A
]f o.9
In'rm
3H
174
IN
.O.L6
6
IG,Wt
315,itl

• 0

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM R 6.6.3 - Rock Dam Sediment Bmin Cdculaaons
with Class B Rip Rap BaR1e
DATE: October 5, 2016
BASIN 2 TOTALDRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC Max. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN &W AC
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSITY (a) 263 C= 0.60
INTENSITY(1e) - 811
Q25=CIA= 0A x 8.21 x 3.60 - 17.73 crr
6CE AREA REQUIRED 1410
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
Roupm
5mrage
Spillway
Top
L 3v FiTl
d-T&I
volume
lice volume
5."
0
0*42M
112
116
62
66 7 56
3
4
17,916
7,300
12/
74 9,176
6
16,952
olvide akrpea (N, 2:1
DEP "OF STORAGE =
3 F1
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1.680 Cu. R.
Dimensions= Top Width 2'; Bolmm Width S'
1,610 Volume Cu. Ft.
Height 3' (1:1 aide slopes)
Length - Basin Storage Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = =Cu. R.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT-
4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -LyQS)/(3x Is$'S1
6 F1
Usemmimum0fl0'
Spillway Flow Dlgblfl)- I

• 0

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 86.63 - Rock Dam Sediment aside Calculstlues
wak Class a Rip Rap Bank
PA11 G(m1u45, 20Ih
[I IN 3 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN AC Max. 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
Tc- 5 MIN INTENSITY(6) 7,03 C= 0,N)
WTENSITY(hs) = it 21
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 8.21 it 2.50 - 12.32 cfs
mn-rla= ne . Ian nen mct 'r.
tCE AREA REQUIRED Out
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
notion:
Smnge
Spmwny
Tap
1. 33 a.e.
volume
acc. voume
3,W0
0
0
0
U2
136
37
dI 5,576
3
d
11626
5.730
11`8
17,056
IM
1 19 T,056
b
12.632
29.fiPN
•Immesmpes lnJ c I
DEPFH OF STORAGE- 3 F1
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 1.990 Cu. Fl.
Dimenaiona- Top Wida 2'; Fannin Widlh 8' 1,990 Volume Cu. R.
Hindu 3' (I:I side slopn)
Length - Basin Storage Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED = -W ('e. FI
SPILLWAYHEIGHT- A 19
TOPOFDAMHEIGHT- 6 F1
SPILLWAY -L=(Qs)I0 xh1d) - d F: Use Minimumof UP
Spillway Flow Dquh(fl)- I

0

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM 0663. Hoek Dam Sediment Basin Calculations
MW Class B Rip Rap Baffle
DATE: October 5, 2016
BASIN 4 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC Maa.18AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
Tc=S MIN INTENSITY(110) 7.03 C= 0.60
INTENSITY (6) = 9.21
Q25=CIA= 0.6 x 8.21 a 1.20 - 5.91 cfs
iCE AREA REQUIRED On
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
L xti I s.a.
I depth
volume
nine. volume
Ba0am
.60
•' 1.go0
0
0
0
Storage
Spillway
72
1 76
42
1 46 13,4961
3
4
7,236
1 3260
7236
10.496
Top1
84
1 54 14,5361
6
1 9.032
18,529
•Ilulde alopcs W.la
DEPTH OFSTORAGE- 3 Al
ROCK BAFFIP VOLUME REDUCTION 1,080 Cu. Ft.
Dimensions= Top Width 2'; Bottom Width 8' I,WO Volume Cu. R.
Height 3'(1:1 side slopes)
Length - Basin Storage W iMh
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED- =Cu. Ft
SPILLWAYHEIGHT= 4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT- 6 Ft
SPILLWAY. L-(8s)1(3 xh1"') 2 Ft Use Minimumof ]0-
Spillway now DepgR)- I

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM d EO- Bak Dm Sediment Bolo CJrulathanr
was Clues B Rip Bap Bollle
DATE: October S. 2016
BASINS 3 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - AC A8na. 18 AC
7OTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN AC
To- 5 MINI INTENSITY(Ilo) - 7111 C. 0.60
INTENSITY (6) - 8.21
025-CIA- 0.6 x 8.21 x L10 = 6.40 oft
ICE AREA REQUIRED Ole
I5.48 I 35
_SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
I.A494!IaII6
depth
volume a<. volume
Unvnm
0
0
0
6lorsne
123
6,246
6.2"
6pillwa5
T6
4
2.990
9.136
Top
N
6
7,232 1
16,368
ehnide slopes @ 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE =
3 Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REMMON
I.U60 LW. Ft.
Dimensions- Top Width 2'; Bolmm Width
S'
I,pBb Volume Cu. Ft.
Hn8hl 3' (1:1 side sbpa)
Length - Basin $image Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED =
_Cu. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT-
4 Ft
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L - (lag 1 3x h") -
2 FI
Use Minimumufl0'
Spillway flow Depth)R)- I

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM Y6.0. Rack Data Sediment Basin Calculations
with Class B Rip Rap Baffle
DATE: October 5, 2016
BASIN B 6 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN iw A(' Max. 10 A('
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASIN -SO A('
Tc=S MIN INTENSITY(I,J 7.03
INTENSITY (6) - R.EI
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 8.21 x 3.00 - MJB CA
UM VOLUME VOLUME REQUIRED
3.00
3600
=
CF
SCE AREA REQUIRED Qln
12.65
035
-
SF
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
I.
N as
volume aec. Volume
itollom
100
6,000
0
0
0
Stan0.r
I:
52
3
11 TM
M.]M
9plll»..
I16
56 6A%
QI60
20,8%
Top
I N
M ]936
b
h3,Q2
35,32E
9nmde
slopes Q 2:1
DEPTH OF STORAGE-
3 FI
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,6110 Cu. Ft.
Dimensions - Top Width Y: Bottom Width a'
100 Volume Cu. Ft.
Height 3'(3:I side slopes)
Length = Basin Savage Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED-
D,OMCu.H
SPILLWAYHEIGHT-
J R
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT=
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(Q,)1(3 x It") =
5 FI
Use Mimmumof 10'
Spillway Flaw Depth(fl)-

Martin
Marietta
East Alamancc Quarry
NCSECDM g 6.0 - Rock Dam Sediment Baaln Calculations
with (lama B Rip Rap Rafe
DATE: Omahor 1, 2016
BASIN 0 ] TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN AC Mac 10 AC
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA TO BASM AC
Tc- S MIN INTENSIT'Y(I,o) _ 7.03 (7= 0.60
INTENSITY 1,D) M.il
Q25-CIA- 0.6 x 8.21 x JAO - 16.75 cfs
mn-ns- n6 . Ina . aen - uaa .r.
,CE AREA REQUIRED Qm
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
BmI
Storage
Spillway
Top
L W s.S.
th
voluR38.688
d�00
I12 3]
0
7
0
16J
116 6i ] 6
1
6,)J
120 69 8j56
6
15.6
-male Stapes W [:I
DEPTH OF STORAGE-
3 Fl
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION
1,680 Cu. Ft.
Dimemimn- Top Width 2'; Bottom Width g'
100 Volume Co. Ft.
Height 3' (I:I side slopes)
Length- Bain Sumge Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED- 11,616 Cu. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT-
J Fl
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT-
6 Ft
SPILLWAY -L=(On)/(7 x ht3 =
6 Ft Usemmimumol IV
Spillway Flow Dey0i(fl)- I

Martin
Marietta
East Alamance Quarry
NCSECDM N 6.63 - Rock Dam Sediment Basin Calculations
with Class B Rlp Rap Baffle
DATE: Osoher S, 2016
BASING B TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO BASIN - ^ At 6lux, 10
TOTAL DISTURBEDAREATOBASIN AC
Tc- S MIN INTENSITY(]it)7.03 r rant
INTENSITY (6) = 811
Q25=CIA- D6 x 9.21 x 0.90 - 4.43 CB
CE AREA REQUIRED Qte
BASIN STORAGE DIMENSIONS
Burros"
Storage
Spillway
Top
voume
sec. volume
"49
0
3
0
5.316
0
5,316
/
2,50o
T,816
6
1 6,332
1 14,148
•Imide slopessail 2A
DEPTH OF STORAGE = 3
Ft
ROCK BAFFLE VOLUME REDUCTION 930
Cu. Ft.
Gemstones = Top Width 2%Bottom Width 8'
930 Volume CY.Ft.
Height 3' (1:1 side slopes)
Length = Basin Su age Width
STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED- _Cu. Ft.
SPILLWAY HEIGHT- 4
FI
TOP OF DAM HEIGHT- 6
Ft
SPILLWAY -L-(Qe)I(3 x htj) - I
Ft Use Minimum of iV
Spillway Flow D*Nft)- I

0 0

Ixgroa
X�
j ' \-f °.UA(
i
l \`Il— F/nJYof
y—le_ Wi11i+n Fmk
1
1 I@^ -
i WIIIum I7 _
.,
I � t_Tx21'[:W RRi Rap Apnm
= ' J 1\ OI p. j I .
matn East Alamance Quarry u"'r"'
Marietta Culvert A Drainage Area Map

v ✓ / (( \ Legend
�\. Drainage Area- ---
-z SeIng Cells
- ) Fine Storage
_ �I
eta - I
Furore Pit
•Tokdrdgedwd 0 4f I ``
J¢J/ / ,aroRmmaids mldoR Prt� I It
Bash #8
-r - ; Diversion
J Baau\v Ditch (tsr) 1
1° I.znc F— I —_—'(1.an 7m sed&mi
eraion � e
Basin as Basin #511
Clem B AL- 'Basin #6 /
/ / \ I lY W RCP®].N/, �1 tindletn
.EnnmRPipeeece\. 154,e \Rip �P —`r '.� l Buffer
i x j Office slid Scaca Mart Marietta Dr
mwtin East Alamance Quarry WALE V m M
Marietta Drainage) Map #1 0 - 111111 4C0

0 0

bance / / ti %� * < O 057-201 ��_.
�8 ( Stockp
Area
p / L Area
aer-
/,' PIan4 Processing
f & Stockpile Ana
S
Settbng Cegs & Pond , j —
I Fine Storage Arm )
Stockpile
Am
J(r ` 25' e�fra
1 Virgins Bowling \
Duke Poye�
_ h
f 608- -4Aay Este
25' Buffer
Legend
Drainage Area - — — —
Gr en Level
Mtn East AlamanceQuarry WALE "'C00'
Marietta Drainage Area Map #2 0

11
NC�M�•,5,
�-
I >
wht
III Ilk- � -
M1
PI
%
.• / `51
...
e..a xz J oace4 T�. /� \ i� Linda JuedCC
�/*
_UrAm
/
Legend in Mefekian —
Drainage Area - — — — / J
East Alamance Quarrymwbn
Marietta Drainage Area Map #3 0

Ditch
b Proffit
\ Provide Rock Ape Inlet
Protection During
Construction of Berm
J,je r NCECSMSol. 6.55 Existing Pipe — V
Ire
14
.5 A( �� Pm posed Culvert A
3701F 18" RCP ® 20°/a
in I r t 9t't7eu 5 Rip R'P Aprm J.
�i PopYscdbetm
Provide Rock Pipe Inlet
Protection During I l q
Construction of Berm V
�I NCECSM Std,6.55
UI •� �.i .� Fulture Pit
\l • To Ix a elopd to cluen a It
'µAll.
.Jn'� I - �I /'—ere, t noufft rcls cutting pit• \ \\
MIS
Legend \
D Are — — — \ \
ramage a - _ J
East Alamance Quarry l5l V -2W
P #4 o t
Drainer a Area Ma
Marietta g � 00 200 .�

• 0
Class B Rip Rap Baffle in Erosion Control Ponds
Proposal
• Allow the use of Class B Rip Rap to construct required baffle in erosion control ponds to
promote velocity, energy reduction and settling efficiency of sediment laden water prior to
discharge. This Class B Rip Rap material would be a substitution for coir fiber for use in our
mining applications.
Purpose
• Provide an area within the first 33%of the basin where the runoff can be temporarily stored
to allow the sediment to settle. The remaining 66% of the basin will provide for continual
treatment of water prior to discharge from the basin.
• This baffle will prevent "short<ircufting" of the basin and premature discharge of sediment
laden water.
Planning Considerations
• The Class B Rip Rap baffle will provide a porous media that will suppress the flow of water
into the basin and allow the water to slow down and spread out across the basin. This will
increase the residency time in the basin thus improving the settling efficiency of the basin.
Design Considerations
• The volume of the baffle shall be taken into consideration when sizing the basin to assure the
reduction in volume will still meet the minimum volume required.
• The top of the baffle shall be constructed at or below the treatment zone as not to affect the
surface area requirement of the basin.
• The baffle shall be extended up the side slopes to prevent the water from flowing around the
sides of the baffle.
• The life span of the Class B Rip Rap Baffle will be 6-12 months, but may need to be replaced
more often if damaged or clogged.

aim B Rip Rap
Baffle
•
mz
Basin 33%of 66%0 Basin
BooInlet L"rh ♦ � L"th Outlet
E* ME+ 1
Qap B Rip Rap Baf11s Dhll mini
Tar WIdM • Y
'
brmm Height 3wimp- e,
Class B Rip Rap Baffle Plan Detail
Inlet Top Ekniatim Tap of Swin
of SoMe
>•=•;;r<
...,
Class 8 Rip Rap Baffle Elevation Detail

0 •

• 0•
Material & Construction Specifications
Class B Rip Rap Specifications
Stone Thickness
do 8 inches
Baffle Width
Min 2'; Max 8'
Tensile Strength
2441798Il
Flow Velocity
> 12 ft/sec
Weight
130lb/d
Minimum Wkith
10 FM
Open Area
♦/-40%
• The baffles will be constructed using not compacted Class B Rip Rap meeting the 2012 NCOOT
Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures In Table 1042-1.
TABLE 1842-1
CEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR RIP RAP AND STONE FOR
Claw Required Stone Shea, Inch
Aainam _ Midrange I
• No more than 5.0%of the material furnished can be less than the minimum size nor no more
than 10%of the material can exceed the maximum size specified.
Maintenance
• The baffles will be Inspected at least once a week and after every rain event.
• Access to the baffles and the basin will need to be maintained for the fife of the basin to allow
for repair and maintenance of the baffles and basin.
• Once the sediment accumulation has reached 50%of the designed storage depth the
sediment will need to be removed.
• If the Rip Rap baffle becomes clogged due to sediment accumulation restricting the flow of
water through the baffle it will need to be replaced.

11 •

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Sectlon
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM Pat McCrory, Governor
Director John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
July 15, 2013
Mr. Brian North, PE
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
413 S. Chimney Rock Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409
RE: Mining Permit Nos, 01-02, 01-08, 04-08, 07-57, 13-23, 13-25, 14-07, 18-01, 18-09,
19-20, 23-02, 25-12, 26-51, 29-03, 34-09, 35-08, 36-12, 36-25, 41-04, 41-05,
41-06, 41-07, 41-18, 41-23, 42-08, 42-15, 49-01, 51-18, 51-46, 52-07, 53-01,
55-02, 60-01, 60-02, 60-04, 60-09, 62-41, 63-09, 65-01, 67-01, 67-39,68-02,
71-09, 73-01, 74-02, 76-02, 77-21, 79-06, 80-01, 80-02, 90-02, 92-01, 92-11,
92-12, 98-30 and 99-05
Alamance, Anson, Beaufort, Cabarrus, Caldwell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland,
Craven, Cumberland, Davidson, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Guilford, Halifax,
Iredell, Johnston, Jones, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, New
Hanover, Onslow, Orange, Pender, Person, Pitt, Randolph, Richmond,
Rockingham, Rowan, Union, Wake, Wilson, and Yadkin Counties
Cape Fear, Yadkin, Tar -Pamlico, Catawba, Broad, Neuse, Roanoke, and White Oak
River Basins
Dear Mr. North:
Your request to have the corporate name changed on the above referenced mining
permits from Martin Marietta Aggregates to Martin Marietta Materials,. Inc. is hereby approved.
As we have received the required surety in an amount sufficient to cover these operations,
am enclosing new cover sheets for each updated mining permit. The permit number,
expiration date and mine name shall remain the same as before this corporate name change.
Please attach this approvalletter to your existing mining permits for future reference.
Please review the cover sheets carefully and notify this office of any objections, questions or
corrections that may need to be addressed.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone]I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: htt :11 oaal.ncdenr.orglweb42 ndlggty
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. North
Page Two
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact Ashley Rodgers, Assistant State Mining Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
4 �5�, tick � `� �r •�
Janet S. Boyer, PEt
`State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JSB/ar
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Mr. Brad Cole, PE
Mr. Pat McClain, PE
Mr. Zahid Khan
Ms. Laura Herbert, PE
Mr. John Holley, PE_
Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton -WRC, w/enclosures
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau,
File
w/o enclosures

A,A
NCDENR
North Caroiina,Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
August 22, 2008
Mr. Nuwan Wijesuriya
Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Aggregates
PO Box 30013
Raleigh, NC 27622-0013
RE: Permit No. 01-08
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Mr. Wijesuriya:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Your application for renewal and modification of the above referenced mining permit
has been approved. The modification is to increase the affected acreage at this site to 411.40
acres as indicated on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008. This modification includes the
addition of overburden disposal area and processing area/hauls roads and the installation and
maintenance of all associated erosion and sedimentation control measures. In addition, the
modification includes the necessary approval from the Division of Water Quality relating to the
stream relocation and stream channel impacts. A copy of the renewed and modified permit is
enclosed. The new expiration date is August 22, 2018.
The conditions in the renewed and modified permit were based primarily upon the initial
application. Modifications were made as indicated by the renewal and modification requests
and as required to insure compliance with The Mining Act of 1971. 1 would like to draw your
particular attention to the following conditions where minor additions or changes were made:
Operating Condition No. 3C, 4D, 5A, and 10B and Reclamation Condition No. 3.
G.S. 74-65 states that the issuance of a mining permit does not supersede or otherwise
affect or prevent the enforcement of any zoning regulation or ordinance duly adopted by an
incorporated city or county or by any agency or department of the State of North Carolina.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 610.61 acres and the amount of
land you are allowed to disturb is 411.40 acres.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612-919-733-4574/ FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Wijesuriya
August 22, 2008
Page Two
Please review the renewed and modified permit and contact Ms. Judy Wehner,
Assistant State Mining Specialist, at [phone] should you have any questions
concerning this matter.
Sinc rely,
Oe
Fioyd . Williams, PG, CPG, CPM
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
FRWIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Matt Gantt, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton-WRC, wlenclosures
Mr. Bradley Bennett-DWQ, wlenclosures
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S.- 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County - Permit No. 0 1 -08
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: Auctust 22, 2018

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereinafter referred to as the Department,
and in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of
this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned, upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plant. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit.
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with reference to reclamation of the
affected land and posts -a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee's successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revoke or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Modifications
August 8 1988: This permit has been modified to include the construction of access/haul
roads to the monitoring wells and the Magazine and the construction of Berm B as indicated
on Sheets 1 and 3 dated June 30, 1988 and Sheets 2 and 4 dated July 29, 1988 of the revised
map.
September 30, 1988: This permit has been modified to include the construction of a second
entrance to Highway 49 and a new berm (Berm F) as indicated on the revised Erosion Control
Plan dated September 12, 1988.

Page 3
March 6, 1990_ This permit has been modified to include the development of the Related Use
Area, the extension of Berm D along the southern property line, and the designation of the
new haul road immediately west of the quarry area denoted in the modification request and
revised Erosion Control Plan dated January 24 and January 15, 1990, respectively.
June 21, 1991: This permit has been modified to include site grading and erosion control
measures relating to the Berm F extension and the Stripping Extension 1991 as specified by
the revised Erosion Control Plan dated April 16, 1991.
November 25, 1992: This permit has been modified to allow the installation of an additional
creek crossing near the existing quarry area and the associated sediment and erosion control
measures as indicated on the Erosion Control Plan dated September 30, 1992, the Storm
Drainage Improvements Plan dated June 4, 1992, and the Erosion Control Details dated June
4, 1992.
April 13, 1993: This permit has been modified to allow the substitution of three 96 inch
aluminized steel type 2 pipes in lieu of the previously approved two 120 inch concrete lined
corrugated metal pipes in Boyd's Creek as indicated on the Alternate Design Plan revised
February 12, 1991
November 22, 1996: This permit has been modified to allow the expansion of Berm F and
associated sedimentation and erosion control measures as indicated on the Mine Map dated
July 27, 1996.
January 27, 1998: This permit has been modified to increase the affected area by 15.3 acres
of overburden removal area and associated erosion and sedimentation control measures, as
indicated on the mine map last.revised September 2, 1997,
February 27, 1998: This permit has been modified to allow the pit expansion, the creek
relocation, and additional overburden storage, along with each activity's associated erosion
and sedimentation control measures, as indicated on the mine map last revised December 8,
1997. The creek relocation and its associated erosion and sedimentation has been approved
with certain stipulations.
June 4, 1998: This permit has been modified to allow on site generated waste material to be
placed in Berm F as indicated on the Mine Map received by the Land Quality Section on April
16, 1998.
May.1, 2002. This permit has been modified to add 6.8 acres to the affected acreage at this
site to allow the construction of an asphalt plant, a slight, revision to the approved pit limits, the
relocation of a monitoring well, and the installation and maintenance of the associated
sediment and erosion control measures as indicated on the 2002 Permit Modification Mine
Map last revised April 24, 2002 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant dated March 7, 2002, This modification also includes an adjustment to the
affected acreage at this site in light of more accurate mapping techniques.

Page 4
July 8, 2002: This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation, has been transferred in its
entirety to Martin Marietta Aggregates.
December 22, 2004: This permit has been modified to incorporate the Haw River Quarry
(Mining Permit No. 01-09) into the East Alamance Quarry permit, and to add an additional
85.5 acres to the permit boundary, as indicated on the Mine Map last revised November 12,
2004. The modification is to increase the permitted acreage to 610.61 acres and the affected
acreage at this site to 380.67 acres. The modification includes the addition of 310.61
permitted acres and the addition of 188.37 affected acres.
Auqust 22, 2008: This permit has been modified to increase the affected acreage at this site
to 411.40 acres as indicated on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008. This modification
includes the addition of overburden disposal area and processing area/hauls roads and the
installation and maintenance of all associated erosion and sedimentation control measures. In
addition, the modification includes the necessary approval from the Division of Water Quality
relating to the stream relocation and stream channel impacts.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until August 22, 2018.
Conditions
This Permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
Wastewater and Quark Dewatering
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission.
B. Any storm water runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary storm water permits or
other approval documents.
2. Air Quality and Dust Control
A. Any mining related process producing air contaminant emissions including
fugitive dust shall be subject to the requirements and rules promulgated by the
N.C. Environmental Management Commission and enforced by the Division of
Air Quality.

Page 5
B. All permanent access roads (plant entrances) pavement shall be maintained
from the junctions with Sandy Cross Road (SR 1752) and NC Highway 49 for the
distances indicated in the last revised mine maps. During processing operation,
water trucks or other means that may be necessary shall be utilized to prevent
dust from leaving the permitted area.
3. Buffer Zones
A. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
B. Sufficient buffer shall be maintained between any affected land and any
adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of that waterway or
wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the integrity of the
natural watercourse or wetland.
C. All buffer zones shown on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008 shall be
maintained to protect adjoining property. These buffer zones, with the exception
of the installation of required sediment control measures and approved earthen
berms, shall remain undisturbed.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control
A. Adequate mechanical barriers including, but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. Energy dissipators shall be provided at all pipe outlets. All energy dissipators
installed after December 22, 2004, shall be constructed, at a minimum, of Class
B stone at a 22-inch thickness, 12 feet long, and as per the detail submitted in
the modification application received by the Land Quality Section on August 6,
2004.
C. All mining activities, including the installation and maintenance of all erosion and
sedimentation control measures, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine
Map last revised November 12, 2004.
D. All mining activities, including those associated with the additional overburden
disposal area, processing area/haul road and stream relocation of the unnamed
tributary to Boyd's Creek, shall be conducted as indicated on the Mine Map last
revised July 2, 2008 and the supplemental information received by the Land
Quality Section on March 20, 2008 and July 7, 2008, with the exception that
temporary sediment control measures be utilized just below the downstream end
of proposed culverts No. 105 and No. 106 during the installation of the culverts;

Page 6
that silt bags or a stilling basin be utilized for any discharge of water that may
have to be pumped from the actual construction area of the Boyd's Creek Road
Crossing; and if necessary, an impervious dike be utilized on the upstream side
of the Boyd`s Creek culvert installation area to impound water for the pumping .
operation.
E. An erosion and sediment control plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department for
approval prior to any land disturbing activities not indicated on the revised
erosion control plan or mine maps submitted with the approved application for a
mining permit and any approved revisions to it. Such areas include, but are not
limited to, expansion outside of the approved pit area, creek crossings, or
expansion of overburden or waste disposal areas.
5. Groundwater Protection
A. The observation wells denoted on the Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008, shall
be monitored at least 30 days prior to initiating any excavations of consolidated
material (rock) in the initial pit area to allow for the determination of pre-existing
(static) groundwater levels.
B. The observation wells shall be drilled wells cased into consolidated rock and
grouted to the surface. The wells (boreholes) shall be extended at least 50 feet
below static water level, or at least 50 feet into unweathered rock, whichever is
deeper. The wells shall be secured against unauthorized entry with a lockable
cap. The necessary permits or approvals to construct these wells shall be
obtained'from the Division of Water Quality.
C. The observation wells shall be monitored quarterly at the same day and
approximate time of day. The static water levels shall be measured with an
accuracy of plus or minus 0.1 foot and shall be referenced to a datum point and
a record of the water levels maintained. The quarterly precipitation and the
volume of pit water discharge shall also be recorded. Copies of these records
shall be provided to the Department on or about the end of each quarter. Static
water level monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
6. Graded Slopes and Fills
A. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which
can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure,
structure, or device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels,
the erosion of which may cause off -site damage because of siltation, shall be
planted or otherwise provided with groundcover, devices or structures sufficient
to restrain such erosion.
B. Overburden cut slopes along the perimeter of the quarry opening shall be graded
to a minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and shall be stabilized within 60

Page 7
days of completion. Furthermore, a minimum ten (1 p) foot wide horizontal safety
bench shall be provided at the top of the rock and at the toe of any overburden
slope.
7. Surface Drainage
The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
8. Blasting
The operator shall monitor each blast with a seismograph located at a distance
no farther than the closest off site regularly occupied structure not owned or
leased by the operator. A seismographic record including peak particle velocity, air
overpressure, and vibration frequency levels shall be kept for each blast (except as
provided under Operating Condition Nos. 8B and 8D of this permit). The following
blasting conditions shall be observed by the mine operator to prevent hazard to persons
and adjacent property from surface blasting:
A. Ground Vibration With Monitoring:
In all blasting operations, the maximum peak particle velocity of any component
of ground motion shall not exceed Figure 1 (below) at the immediate location of
any regularly occupied building outside of the permitted area such as a dwelling
house, church, school, or public, commercial or institutional building.

Page 8
+a.a
n.:
etnat Vibration Erncu enc•r, Hz
cjgt:.^C• i �„ 5^. af:'r�l b �S:rn� �..: •3i .y;ta••R
(Sat e
B. Ground Vibration Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
W = (DID,)' D. = D
W1n
V = 180(D,)-"
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
D, = Scaled distance factor.
V = Peak Particle Velocity (inches per second).
The peak particle velocity of any component shall not exceed 1.0 inch per
second, for the purposes of this Section.

Page 9
C. Air blast With Monitorina:
Air blast overpressure resulting from surface blasting shall not exceed 129
decibels linear (dBL) as measured at the immediate location of any regularly
occupied building not owned or leased by the operator outside of the permitted
area such as a dwelling house, church, school, or public, commercial or
institutional building, unless an alternate level based on the sensitivity of the
seismograph microphone as specified below is being used:
Lower Frequency Limit of Max Level,
Measuring System, in Hz in dBL
0.1
Hz or lower -flat response
134
peak
2.0
Hzor lower -flat response
133
peak
6.0
Hz or lower -flat response
129
peak
D. Air blast Without Monitoring:
In the event of seismograph malfunction or other condition, which prevents.
monitoring, blasting shall be conducted in accordance with the following
formulas:
To convert U (psi) to P (dBL):
U = 82 (D/Wv33)-i.z
P = 20 x log (U/2.9x10-9)
Confined Air blast/Overpressure (dBL)
for quarry situation:
A=P-35
U = Unconfined air overpressure (pounds per square inch).
W = Maximum charge weight of explosives per delay period of 8.0 milliseconds
or more (pounds).
D = Distance from the blast site to the nearest inhabited building not owned or
leased by the mine operator (feet).
P = Unconfined air overpressure (decibels).
A = Air blast or air overpressure for typical quarry situations (decibels).
The air blast/overpressure shall not exceed 129 decibels, for the purposes of this
Section.
E. Record Keeping:

Page 10
The operator shall maintain records on each individual blast describing; the total
number of holes; pattern of holes and delay of intervals; depth and size of holes;
type and total pounds of explosives; maximum pounds per delay interval; amount
of stemming and burden for each hole; blast location; distance from blast to
closest offsite regularly occupied structure; and weather conditions at the time of
the blast. Records shall be maintained at the permittee's mine office and copies
shall be provided to the Department upon request.
F. Excessive Ground Vibration/Air blast Reporting:
If ground vibration or Air blast limits are exceeded, the operator will immediately
report the event with causes and corrective actions to the Department. Use of
explosives at the blast site that produced the excessive reading shall cease until
corrective actions approved by the Department are taken. However, blasting
may occur in other approved areas within the permitted boundary. Authorization
to blast at the blast site may be granted at the time of the verbal reporting of the
high ground vibration or high air blast reading if the circumstances justify verbal
approval. Failure to report will.constitute a permit violation.
G. Flvrock Prevention:
The operator shall take all reasonable precautions to ensure that flyrock is not
thrown beyond areas where the access is temporarily or permanently guarded by
the operator. Failure to take corrective measures to prevent flyrock and
repeated instances of flyrock shall be considered a violation of the Mining Permit.
H. Flvrock Reporting:
Should flyrock occur beyond the permitted and guarded areas, the operator shall
immediately report the incident to the Department. Further use of explosives on
the mine site shall be suspended until the following actions have been taken:
A thorough investigation as to the cause(s) of the incident shall be
conducted.
2. A report detailing .the investigation shall be provided to the Department
within 10 days of the incident. The report shall, at a minimum, document
the cause(s) of the incident along with technical and management actions
that will be taken to prevent further incidents. The report shall meet with
the approval of the Department before blasting may resume at the mine
site.
Studies:
The operator shall provide to the Department a copy of the findings of any
seismic studies conducted at the mine site in response to an exceedence of a
level allowed by these blasting conditions. The operator shall make every

Page 11
reasonable effort to incorporate the studies' recommendations into the
production blasting program.
.Notice, -
The operator shall, when requested by the Department, give 24-hour advance
notice to the Land Quality Section Regional Office prior to any blast during a
period for which notice is requested.
9. High Wall Barrier
A physical barrier consisting of large boulders placed end -to -end or 48-inch fencing with
two strands of barbed wire (total 60 inches overall height) shall be maintained at all
times along the perimeter of any highwall to prevent inadvertent public access. In
addition, a minimum 10 foot wide horizontal safety bench shall be provided at the
junction between the top of rock and the toe of any overburden cut slope.
10. Visual Screening
A. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between the mine and public
thoroughfares to screen the operation from the public. Additional screening
methods, such as constructing earthen berms, shall be employed as deemed
appropriate by the Department.
B. Vegetated earthen berms shall be located and constructed as shown on the
Mine Map last revised July 2, 2008. In addition to grasses, long leaf and/or
Virginia pines or other acceptable evergreen species shall be planted as deemed
appropriate by the Department to improve visual and noise buffering.
C. The Previously Approved Overburden Disposal Area and Future Berm areas
shall be constructed and stabilized as indicated on the Mine Map last revised
November 12, 2004.
11. Plan Modification
A. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit and any
approved revisions to it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
B. A modification request shall be submitted to and approved by the Department
prior to commencement of any mining related activities on the 33.82-acre tract as
depicted on the Mine Map last revised November 12, 2004. As part of said
request, the permittee shall provide proper notification to all adjoining
landowners and the chief administrative officer(s) of the local government(s) of
its intentions to affect any areas in said tract.

Page 12
12. Refuse Disposal
A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5. steel reinforced air hoses
6. drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. ve'rification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established
13. Annual Reclamation Report
An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
14. Bondinq

Page 13
The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a
$500,000.00 blanket bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the
approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The
total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
15. Archaeological Resources
Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be granted
access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological resources.

Page 14
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
1. The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
1. Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation Schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to allow the quarry excavation to fill with water, provide a permanent barricade
(fence) along the top of any high wail, and grade and revegetate any areas in
unconsolidated material.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:

' Page 15
A. All areas of unconsolidated material such as overburden or waste piles shall be
graded to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter slope and terraced as necessary to
insure slope stability.
B. Any settling ponds and sediment control basins shall be backfilled, graded, and
stabilized or cleaned out and made into -acceptable lake areas.
C. The processing, stockpile, and other disturbed areas neighboring the mine
excavation shall be leveled and smoothed.
D. Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled or otherwise prepared before
revegetation.
E. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Conditions Nos. 12A.
through 12D.
F. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Reve etation Plan:
Disturbed areas shall be permanently revegetated according to the Revegetation Plan
on the Details Sheet last revised July 2, 2008 and approved by Mr. Nuwan Wjesuriya of
Martin Marietta Materials on March 19, 2008.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.

Ob
Page 16
This permit, issued to Luck Stone Corporation March 4, 1988, modified August 8, 1988,
September 30; 1988, March 6, 1990, June 21, 1991, November 25, 1992, April 13,
1993, November 22, 1996, and January 27, 1998, modified and renewed February 27,
1998, modified June 4, 1998 and May 1, 2002, transferred in its entirety to Martin
Marietta Aggregates July 8, 2002 and modified December 22, 2004, is hereby
simultaneously renewed and modified this 22nd day of August, 2008 pursuant to G.S.
74-52.
By:
Azk
James D. Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
East Alamance Quarry
Alamance County - Permit No. 01-08
for the operation of a
Crushed Stone Quarry
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: August 22 2018

Rodgers, Ashley
From:
Brian North <brlan.north®martinmarietta.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:46 AM
To:
Rodgers, Ashley
Subject:
RE: Additional LEAS needed for Martin Marietta name change
Ashley,
Thanks for the work on this request. We will provide the revised LEA's back to you
ASAP. Also, congratulations on passing the PE 11 I know you put in a lot of hard work. Take
care.
Brian K. North, PE
Division Environmental Manager
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
[phone] (Office)
[phone] (Mobile)
From: Rodgers, Ashley (mailtoashlev rodaem(anrdenr.aovl
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:19 PM
To: Jay Nlvens
Cc: Brian North
Subject: Additional LEAS needed for Martin Marietta name change
Jay,
As discussed, I will let this email serve as my request for additional information for the Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
name change.
After a file review, the followingpermits need new Land Entry Agreements to provide the correct applicant name
(Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.):
04-08 Pee Dee Quarry
23-02 Kings Mountain Quarry
36.25 Gaston Quarry
60-04 Matthews Quarry
90-02 Bakers Quarry
In addition, we are requesting new Land Entry Agreements for the following permits to provide the correct Quarry
name:
18-01 Hickory Quarry
68-02 American Stone Quarry
Please provide completed, original Land Entry Agreements for each of the mine permits listed above. As always, let me
know if you have any questions.
Thanks,

Ashley Rodgers, PE
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDENR Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
[phone]
[phone]- fax
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and niay be
disclosed to third parties.

Rodgers, Ashley
From: Rodgers, Ashley
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 2,19 PM
To: Jay Nivens ([e-mail])
Cc: Brian North ([e-mail])
Subject: Additional LEAS needed for Martin Marietta name change
Jay,
As discussed, I will let this email serve as my request for additional information for the Martin Marietta Materials, Inc
name change.
After a file review, the following permits need new Land Entry Agreements to provide the correct applicant name
(Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.):
04-08 Pee Dee Quarry
23-02 Kings Mountain Quarry
36-25 Gaston Quarry
60-04 Matthews Quarry
90-02 Bakers Quarry
In addition, we are requesting new Land Entry Agreements for the following permits to provide the correct Quarry
name:
18-01 Hickory Quarry
68-02 American Stone Quarry
Please provide completed, original Land Entry Agreements for each of the minepermits listed above. As always, let me
know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Ashley Rodgers, PE
Assistant State Mining Specialist
NCDENR Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
[phone]
[phone] - fax
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

MIMING CHECKLIST FOR ROUTING
yjlrraan Nam: (-tlaet+n fy)o:,p+4i O jaji L Xl, Pm)at Nm:yo, 9 (c an
zne .
�•c CPI„ 1 �
A) ka/PVME NO.: r la .) canij. ✓n �r o � s Ddt Rattvol: (.g 4 !I
Reamr. li. I�L�y�[�5 RMr Raid Now.. VU I OIA,C
❑ New ❑ Rnnal
❑
Modoutim (bLoklerNt6madara)
❑ Med*Atlm (mb-tde,eandt kaadafa)
,n
Twa , . ( 1'' c ❑ Rehm
❑ Pau Rehm ❑ Addtttanal IoMa M
❑
Pa Nadal m?Fa Rtatetd: 0 5iD00.oa
P6u mutt adtn jZkcf A Iciff to:
e o;.,r"''n.,5, o- Rrglanal CPU (2 tom' apes% muk drt' "WaW *" °wmy9 AnLwtm wean
a:heddta• to as or and &ah kA des Dwq* DAcVmwW Anhu uoA Regen r to des other rayy; awl bth NK5 to dm REma
BENNO
Daft: ROW L!tr l 3 Rxd
❑ Dwon of wda Rem w Date: Rand Rend
Nc wdd* Remmo caemdamn Darr P.MW Rtdd
❑ US Pbh A w14 sawa Darr RMW Rtrd
(oaly w aflheaaaa and maaofaftan mquear twit add lead to theyamnt)
Plum mart /test 3 pgaa err/ tla 974 adlan and my Wabcn"tr.
❑
DWOM 7 Pair ARVWAUM
D&:
ROW
Ra'd
Ne Cmiovw ww, &Man
Dart:
R&W
Rend
❑
DtKilon of Mnut Ptshata
Dart:
Radtd
Rend
❑
DtW M of Ralf A wales CanmAabM (phlt LEA)
Dart,
ROW
RWd
(o* sex jfhr w and madlfkem rtqueaa dart add land
to d¢lerwd)
❑ DMdon of AMkM a Ntday
(oalj nnr ahllanrlona)
❑ Dflat:
••Stlhgrew Date for Coemteds: it/ Y4
❑ PWX wte tim falltRbgq:
Dare: RMW Rtrd
D&: Raded Rerd
(no firer Hann a &pft0n ")
cA
Ui a •u '^4'.l:!•',. eJ'• iGl.�.6+ T+` jj0 Lr>i nr
U
c�i 11I ujS f;l r��"+d

�
Martin Marietta Materials
Greensboro District RECENT
413 S Chimney Rock Road
Greensboro, NC 27409 JUN 0 4 2013
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Div of Land Resources
May 31, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7010 1670 0000 5792 1231
Mr. Tracy Davis, PE, CPM
Director, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
North Carolina DENR
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Re: Request to Change the Name on Existing Mining Permits
Dear Mr. Davis:
Thanks for taking the time to meet with Yvonne and me on Monday, May 6, 2013 to discuss the legal
ownership name and reclamation blanket bond for all of the North Carolina mining permits that have been
issued to Martin Marietta. As we discussed, the company name that has been listed on our mining permit
applications in the space for "Name of Applicant" for many years has been Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.,
though the mining permits have been issued under the name of Martin Marietta Aggregates which is an
operating division of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., but not a separate legal entity or subsidiary. In review
of the permits issued for Martin Marietta's quarries, we have determined that all of the previous mining
permit renewal applications and the most recent mining permit modification submittals have been requested
using the corporate legal name of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., along with all of the associated Land
Entry Agreements that are currently on file with your Department. Therefore, it is our understanding that the
documents currently on file with your office are correct, and it is not necessary to submit additional
documentation.
The attached Surety Rider reflects a correction to the name of the Principal of the existing Reclamation
Blanket Bond from "Martin Marietta Aggregates, a Division of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a
Subsidiary of Martin Marietta Corporation" to "Martin Marietta Materials, Inc." It is our desire that all
existing and future mining permits that are issued by your Department to Martin Marietta be listed
with the legal corporate name of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Attached is a list of the permits which
are affected by this request. A check for $5600 is attached to cover the $100 processing fee for each
permitted quarry.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at [phone] or
e-mail me at brian.northamartinmarietta.corn.
Sincerely,
TIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
D
Brian IC. orth, PE
Division Environmental Manager

LIST OF PERMITS FOR
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
May 2013
Arrowood-60-01
Asheboro-76-02
Bakers-90-02
Belgrade-67-01
Benson-51-18
Bessemer City-36- I 2
B1ackAnkle-6241
Bonds-13-23
Burl ington-0 1 -02
Caldwell-14-07
Castle Hayne-65-01
Central Rock-41-07
Chapel Hill (American Stone)-
Charlotte-60-02
Clarks-25-12
68-02
Cumberland-26-51
Denver-55-02
East Alamance-0 1 -08
Fountain-74-02
Franklin-35-08
Fuquay-92-12
Garner-92-01
Gaston-36-25
Goldston-19-20
Hickory-18-01
Hicone-41-06
High Point-41-18
Jamestown-41-04
Kannapolis-80-01
Kings Mountain-23-02
Lemon Springs-53-01
Maiden-18-09
Mallard Creek-60-09
Matthews-60-04
Onslow-67-39
Pee Dee-04-08
Person-73-01
Pollocksville-52-07
Pomona-41-05
Raleigh-Durham-92-11
Reidsville-79-06
Richmond-77-21
Rocky Point-71-09
Rocky River-13-25
Salem Stone-34-09
Selma-51-46
Statesville-49-01
Thomasville-29-03
Viewmont-41-23
Vanceboro-07-57
Vass-63-09
Weldon42-08
Weldon II-42-15
Wilson-98-30
Woodleaf-80-02
Yadkin-99-05
Land QualitANC Mine Permits for N064K (no