20230907_JD_submittal

I
i
f
i
t
i
i
i
I ,II1 ■
•
(f
f
AmIk
i
Agent Authorization Letter
' February 1, 2023
Owner Information j
{
Owner Name : Havelock Drug Store, LLC - Melton Valentine III
Mailing Address:1500 Sunday Drive Suite 300
City, State, Zip: Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone#:
i
I
Property Description
PIN:0504927, 0500677
Project: View Nicholson Rd I
Address: 2720 View Nicholson Rd
i
County: Martin
I Melton Valentine III
j as owner/agent of the above referenced '
property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to enter the subject property
E
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
t
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
f 1
i
Owner 3/23/2023
1
Signature Title Date
i
I
i
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel,NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
I
www.WetlandNC.com I
i
i
i
3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: View Nicholson Road city/county: Martin Sampling Date: 12/08/2022
Applicant/Owner: Martin V State: NC Sampling Point: PP2
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Wllllamston
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): HIIISIope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex slope(%): 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.889849 Long: -77069533 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: AaA—Altavista fine sand y loam, 0 to 2 percent sloe NW]classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeah Yes= No= (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or H yd rology=sig n ifi ca ntly disturbed'=Are"Normal Circumstances°present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation=Soil=or Hydrology=naturally problematic?=(If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No=
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No� is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes= No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) =Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
=Surface Water(Al) =Aquatic Fauna(B13) =Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
=High Water Table(A2) =Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) =Drainage Patterns(131 D)
=Saturation(A3) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) =Mass Trim Lines(1316)
=Water Marks(81) =Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) =Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
=Sediment Deposits(132) =Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) =Crayfish Burrows(C8)
=Drift Deposits(133) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(B4) =Thin Muck Surface(C7) =Geomorphic Position(D2)
=Iron Deposits(85) =Other(Explain in Remarks) =ShaIIowAquitard(D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) =FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
F—iWater-Stained Leaves(Bg) Sphagnum moss(138)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes= No Q Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pant: PP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
wee Rtrahim (Plrf size 25ft x 25ft o/ Cover _Specie,? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Water Oak(Quercus nigra) 20% Yes FAC That Are Oei FACW,or FAC: 10 (A)
2 Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 20% YPS FACW
Bitternut Hickory(Carya cordiformis) o FAC Total Number Dominant 10
3. 5/„ �I.O— Species Acrosss All Strata: (B)
4. - -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6. -
45 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 22.5 20%of total cover: 9 Total%Cover of MultiglyhY_
.Saolina Stratiim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft t OBL species x 1 = 0
1 Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 5% Yes FAC/FA FACW species x 2= 0
2 Water Oak(Quercus nigra) 10% Yes FAC FAC species x 3= 0
3 _ _ FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ _ UPL species x 5= 0
5. - -
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6. - Prevalence Index —B/A= NaN
15 —Total Cover H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Si Stratum (Plat size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
,.American Holly(Ilex opaca) 3% Yes FAC
3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
2 Chinese Privet(Ligustrum sinese) 5% Yes FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3.-
4.- 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.- be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6.- - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
8 =Total Cover Tree—Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 1•6 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 Barnyard grass(Echinochloa crusgalli) 5% Yes FACE Sapling—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 - - approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 _ _ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6..- - Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
3 ft(1 m)in height.
10.-
Woody vine—All woody vines,regardless of height.
11.- -
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2•5 20%of total cover: 1
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.Cat Greenbrier(Smilax glauca) 1% Yes FAC
2.Grape(Vitis spp.) 1% Yes FACW
3 Poison Ivy(Toxicodendron radicans) 2% Yes FAC
4.- -
5. Hydrophytic
4 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 0.g
Present? Yes No=
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: PP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 100% SiL
3-15 10YR 6/4 100% SiL
15-24 10YR 7/3 100% SiL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) ❑2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) HPiedmont
Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 15313)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑_ Marl(F10)(LRR U) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑_ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑_ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O, P,T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) ❑_ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,15013)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface(37)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= NoR:1
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: View Nicholson Road city/county: Martin Sampling Date: 12/08/2022
Applicant/Owner: Martin V State: NC Sampling Point: PP2
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Wllllamston
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): HIIISIope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex slope(%): 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.889849 Long: -77069533 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: AaA—Altavista fine sand y loam, 0 to 2 percent sloe NW]classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeah Yes= No= (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or H yd rology=sig n ifi ca ntly disturbed'=Are"Normal Circumstances°present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation=Soil=or Hydrology=naturally problematic?=(If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No=
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No� is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes= No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) =Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
=Surface Water(Al) =Aquatic Fauna(B13) =Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
=High Water Table(A2) =Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) =Drainage Patterns(131 D)
=Saturation(A3) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) =Mass Trim Lines(1316)
=Water Marks(81) =Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) =Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
=Sediment Deposits(132) =Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) =Crayfish Burrows(C8)
=Drift Deposits(133) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(B4) =Thin Muck Surface(C7) =Geomorphic Position(D2)
=Iron Deposits(85) =Other(Explain in Remarks) =ShaIIowAquitard(D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) =FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
F—iWater-Stained Leaves(Bg) Sphagnum moss(138)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes= No Q Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pant: PP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 25ft x 25ft ) %Cover _S ecp ies? _Status Number of Dominant Species
1 FAC 20% Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 10 (A)
2 FACW 20% Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 FAC 5% No FAC Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4. -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6. -
45 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 22.5 20%of total cover: 9 Total%Cover of: Multiply bY_
25ft x 25ft OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) o species x 2= 0 FACW s
1 FAC/FACW- 5/o Yes FAC/F� p
2 FAC 1070 YeS FAC FAC species x 3= 0
3 _ _ FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ _ UPL species x 5= 0
-
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6. - Prevalence Index =B/A— NaN
15 =Total Cover H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plat size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. FAC 3% Yes FAC 3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
2. FAC 5% YeS FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.4.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5. - be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6. - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
8 =Total Cover Tree—Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 1.6 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 FACW- 5% Yes FACW Sapling—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 - - approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
4. - Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.-- _ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6. - Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
8._ - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9. - -
Woody vine—All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.- -
11.- -
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2•5 20%of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.FAC 1% Yes FAC
2,FACW-UPL 1% Yes FACW
3.FAC 2% Yes FAC
4.- -
5. Hydrophytic
4 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 0.8
Present? Yes No=
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: PP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 100% SiL
3-15 10YR 6/4 100% SiL
15-24 10YR 7/3 100% SiL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) ❑2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) HPiedmont
Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 15313)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑_ Marl(F10)(LRR U) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑_ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑_ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O, P,T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) ❑_ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,15013)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface(37)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= NoR:1
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

ALI
0
BERTIE
44
11 14
12
13 64 64
0 64 64
MARTIN �,:...
17 ASHIN O
171 sr r-,any
PITT Spa
BEAUFORT ---13
_4
- a
m
rek
QP a
a
!ft
lri
f!
Conine Cceek
its
rn ` 400� Rf.ve
��/�
Will amston Mfroow
�.
Skewak�p
4-6
retts F
'J,ch R 3 t
Btownp Q
Project_Locatlon National Geographic,Esri, Garmin,HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA,ESA,
METI, NRCAN, GEBCO,NOAA,increment P Corp.
Project Name: View Nicholson Road N
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC U re:FI
eOL� PINs: 0500677 & 0504927 g
P.O.Box 244 0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles 14 Dec 2022
Bunnlevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1 1

Wetland extents without delineation flags are approximated Entire northeast section
based on lidar and aerial photgraphy. is considered wetland
y The project area only includes a portion of the south parcel. for purposes of this project.
r- 1 ,.. _
s1�al
--...__ d50'
••.rit
.._..
aa50 ? _ ...
_ -
_..
-
:-- -
d100
::::. _:.�7aGr. •: ':::- ll `_,- fir, - 1
r kk1 jj1 kk50.
`bzz25 y ---
6:� slr
-°" kk25�
i
TV
. . .. -
zz50i
Delineation Flags o F1 -F18 o PP1 -PP40
o Al -A7 o FF1 -FF4 o S1 -S57
o AA1 -AA51 o 11 -J8 o T1 -T181 View Nicholson N. Parcel - 557 acres
o B1 -B6 o JJ1 -JJ28 o V1 -V12
View Nicholson S. Parcel- 717 acres
o C1 -C143 o K1 -K13 o W1 -W20
o CC1 -CC6 o KK1 -KK59 o X1 -X5
.s Preliminary WOUS (Mill Branch)- 3,497 ft
Potential Mine Areas (Approximated)
o D1 -D134 o M1 -M60 o Z1 -Z19 -
-4
o DD1 -DD35 o N1 -N38 o ZZ-ZZ52 Prelim Sec 404 Wetlands-246.64 acres
Sour , : E-sri, M r,E rthstar eo r phics n the IS er mmunity
Project Name: View Nicholson Road N
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure: 2
eOL� PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet 09 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1 I

+► - +_ice ♦_ - „_ 4
Ap
dW—
_ '►�� -��r* �,+_-d' - ,.. �•_ .. . (�. -� i •��._! _yam
r �.-. .�} - - �R~ �: .► yr- _ �,
1 : y6- - �-_-
_+ — - ♦_ J r i s ` yr,
- : + +
4 - r• /� _ +
Ap-
pp 1 _ -' r - • 11- -�. t
r
M- �� y
If
�► yr_ �_►
�Q / 3♦ � 1 � � 1
710
• � - 1 ,�
..• 1•j`n9dom iiall.�\\
20
I —
vL • —
- �,- ��'- '� _ �,,• Williamston � .� . ,,.�, _\ � -
�� 1 �•• View-Nicholson N. Parcel -- 557.48 acres
n `, View Nicholson S. Parcel -• 717 acres
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet : 4
I I I I I I USGS 24k Topo Grid
% Cem
N
Project Name: View Nicholson Road
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure. 6
PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 USGS 7.5-Minute Topo; Quitsna & Williamston Quadrangles 7 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

s -
AgCh � � • _
i
Ro AaA
A9 Ch
CnA Ch Ro AaA -
AaA AaA Ag
WkB A9 WkB AaA WkB
R
= WnD TaB AaA .,
AaA �B AaA AaA Aa
A '•.
' Ro
WkB
AaA
AaA Ch
' Le
w VVnF Ch
WnF _
a Ro AaA
AaA WkB
t
Ag: �
NoB
AaA AaA
nF
GoA BoB NoB Bb 1
t NoA Bb
N,B
BoB Bb
G0 BoB
r lip
See Figure 4b for Legend
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet
s SoGrc : E-sri, M r,E rhhsta"r'Geog,ra`py ics,anid the GAS User Commu t..y'
N
Project Name: View Nicholson Road
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure: 4a
PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) 07 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

�• " q Ch
Ch AaA
Ro AaA
Ag \ Ch ''�►,
CnA Ch Ro AaA
AaA AaA Ag r
NOB ,v `r •�: , ��,.. 1.:,`
WnD WkB Ag WkB AaA WkB "A -4
WnD AaA +��'
TaB P�Jr
J AaA CnA AaA AaA
WkB
r;
Ro
WkB
�r AaA � n
NC DEQ Hydrology
View Nicholson N. Parcel - 557 acres
View Nicholson S. Parcel -717 acres
`\ Ch y° "I �.r
z;� e .
Soil Map Units
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded AaA Ro AaA
Ag—Augusta loam, occasionally flooded WkB ;6;..
Bb—Bibb loam,frequently flooded
BoB—Bonneau loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Ch—Chastain silt loam, frequently flooded AaA AaA
- CnA—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes nF
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NoB Bb
Le—Lenoir loam Bb
NoA—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Ro—Roanoke loam,frequently flooded
\ TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
WkB—Wickham sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
WnD—Winton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes •
WnF—Winton fine sandy loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes ,
• • �`
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet 0
T,f I I I I I I
pRUMn th- 1= se mmunity
N
Project Name: View Nicholson Road
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure: 4b
PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) 07 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

PFO 1/4A
PF01/40, PF0.1/4A PUBHx PF04/1A� PF01C PF04/1>A
PF01 F�
PUBHx PF01F PF01F PF01F PF01C
R2UBH �PF1/EM1F PF01/2F
PFQ1/4C
0
PF01F PF01/4A � PF01/4A PF01C
PF01 F CPF0-1 C R2UBH
PF�01/4C PF04/1A
\F04A PF04A PF01/2F
PF01C PF01F PSS1/4A
PEM1/F04A PF01A
PF0.1A & PEM1C
PEM1/F04A PF01F
PF01/4C PFOTF
PF01 C PF01'C
PF01 F PFOTC PF01 F PFO-1 F PF01 C
/PF01A'PF01AC PSS4 IJ PF01F
/ PEM1Fx PF01F
111 PF01F
C PF01F
PF01 .--r1
PF01AC PF01F
�P_01'F
PF01F PF01C
PSS4/1 A
V\ ' PF01A
PF04 F P�F01 F
PFO.1/SS1A PF01F PEM1F _
PF01C PF01A v PF01�v `PF01F A
PF01/2F PF01C
PFO\ 1%4C
R5UBH \A PF04/1C `
PFO AC PFO�F PFO1/4C
PUBH PF01C
PF01C PF0il PEM1A
R5UBH R4SBC PF01F
PF01/4C PF01C PEMMAf
PF01C
R5UBH REWC
/pEM1/SS1C
r PF01/EM.1•A
PF04/1A R5UBH PUBHFi P.F01/4A �--i
PF01A P_F01/4C PF01+A,pF01C
PF01G PF01/2F
PF01C PF01A
� PF01/4C PF01 F
i PFO4A PSS1UEM1F
_ e
PF- 1/4A �' - PSS1 C PF01 C PF01 C
PFO_ c
R5,UBH PF01/SS1C PSS1/4C
PSS1/4A PEM"1 C
r --
PF01Ad R5UBH PSS1C�
PF01C
PF01/4C PSS1A
PF01 A PF01/4A.
PEM1F
0 PF01 A
PF1�4 PF01/4A RSS1A ` �`
PF04A PF04/1A View Nicholson N. Parcel — 557 acres
5UBH R5UBH
PUBHx y r View Nicholson S. Parcel 717 acres
PEM1F._ Wetland Type (Cowardin)
R5UBH
" sS1'/4A Freshwater Emergent Wetland
rr' PFO1-A:• PEM1F f F�. .� p
r x• PF\01/4C PFv01AK _ PEM•1
� �:r = Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
PF01/4A PF0
- 1)F04/1A C Freshwater Pond
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet C PF01/EM1A
I I I I I I Riverine
Sours ty..
N
Project Name: View Nicholson Road
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure. cJ
PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 USFWS National Wetland Inventory (20221006) 07 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

`� 3720576800
1
View Nicholson N. Parcel -- 557 acres
3720576700 .t7 View Nicholson S. Parcel -- 717 acres
FIRM Panel
Flood Zone
0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE (500-year)
- AE (100-year)
AE FLOODWAY
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet
I I I I �ri
X(Low risk)
Source: EMa
N
Project Name: View Nicholson Road
Location: 2720 View Nicholson Rd, Williamston, NC Figure: 6
PINs: 0500677 & 0504927
P.O.Box 244 NC Flood Risk Information System 07 Jan 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:#CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:Adam Carter,Wetland Solutions,LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel,NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME,AND NUMBER: Wilmington,#FOLDER_NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:2720 View Nicholson Rd
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough:Martin City:Williamston
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.893001'Long.: -77.0767890
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
HUC: Roanoke 03010107
Name of nearest waterbody:Mill Branch(Class C)
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude(decimal Longitude Estimated amount of Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
Number degrees) (decimal degrees) aquatic resources in resources(i.e., which the aquatic resource
review area(acreage wetland vs.non- "may be"subject(i.e.,
and linear feet,if wetland waters) Section 404 or Section
a licable 10/404
W1 35.893712 -77.071726 22.97 acres Wetland Section 404
W2 35.890080 -77.069772 40.56 acres Wetland Section 404
W3 35.892372 -77.077011 66.16 acres Wetland Section 404
W4 35.894991 -77.082288 3.33 acres Wetland Section 404
W5 35.889350 -77.078303 3.08 acres Wetland Section 404
W6 35.890372 -77.082638 51.8 acres Wetland Section 404
W7 35.895620 -77.087049 0.21 acres Wetland Section 404
W8 35.891568 -77.087705 36.32 acres Wetland Section 404
W9 35.885315 -77.068523 14.55 acres Wetland Section 404
W10 35.887715 -77.070035 1.38 acres Wetland Section 404
W11 35.886565 -77.071700 6.28 acres Wetland Section 404
Total' 246.64 acres
S 1 35.891596 -77.083423 3,7491f Non-wetland Section 10/404
1 Some extents approximated based on lidar and aerial photography

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3)the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5)undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area,the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters'study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
®U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: 24K; Quitsna&Williamston Quads
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 20220121
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS 20221006
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panels: 3720576800, 3720576700, 3720577700
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial(Name & Date): NC CGIA 1/29/2021
or❑Other(Name&Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
3/22/2023
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD(REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
N
RCS
States Department of
Agriculture and other Martin County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment North Carolina
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
View Nicholson Road
r 'I
rt .
5 000 ft
December 12, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Martin County, North Carolina.........................................................................14
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded.................................................................................................. 14
Ag—Augusta loam, occasionally flooded....................................................15
Bb—Bibb loam, frequently flooded..............................................................16
BoB—Bonneau loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes.....................................17
Ch—Chastain silt loam, frequently flooded................................................. 18
CnA—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes..................................... 19
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes........................... 20
Le—Lenoir loam..........................................................................................22
NoA—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes.................................24
NoB—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes.................................25
Ro—Roanoke loam, frequently flooded...................................................... 26
TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes........................................28
WkB—Wickham sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded............29
WnD—Winton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes..............................30
WnF—Winton fine sandy loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes............................ 31
References............................................................................................................33
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

11 11 /1/ 11 11 11 � 11
f
Ag
Ch AaA WkB
Ro AaA Ch
Cn �Ch
Ro AaA
AaA AaA Ag
NoB�
p`g WkB AaA WkB
-� WnD TaB AaA V�
Cn Ro AaA
AaA WkB AaA aA
WkB
AaA\AaA
Ch \Ch
Le
n F
WnF
( AaA Ro AaA
AaA. 1NkB
• AaA
NoB AaA
�A;• r. 1NnFCh
GoA NoB,gb
" Bb
B o b
r
11 11 /11 11 11 11 � 11
1 11 :11 11 :11
1 1 111 111 �111 .111
•

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) 1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Soils Very Stony Spot Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons measurements.
Wet Spot
rwr Soil Map Unit Lines
.A Other Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Soil Map Unit Points Web Soil Survey URL:
.- Special Line Features Special Point Features Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
{J Blowout Water Features
Streams and Canals Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
14 Borrow Pit projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Transportation distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Clay Spot #_F_+ Rails Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Closed Depression Interstate Highways accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
r•,,r
Gravel Pit US Routes
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
Gravelly Spot Major Roads of the version date(s)listed below.
0 Landfill Local Roads Soil Survey Area: Martin County,North Carolina
Lava Flow Background Survey Area Data: Version 19,Sep 12,2022
Marsh or swamp Im Aerial Photography
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
+ Mine or Quarry 1:50,000 or larger.
Miscellaneous Water
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: May 9,2022—Jun 5,
Perennial Water 2022
IV Rock Outcrop
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Saline Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Sandy Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa Sodic Spot
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AaA Altavista fine sandy loam,0 to 2 154.6 12.1%
percent slopes,occasionally
flooded
Ag Augusta loam,occasionally 36.0 2.8%
flooded
Bb Bibb loam,frequently flooded 2.1 0.2%
BoB Bonneau loamy sand,0 to 6 48.2 3.8%
percent slopes
Ch Chastain silt loam,frequently 727.0 57.0%
flooded
CnA Conetoe loamy sand,0 to 3 18.2 1.4%
percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 5.2 0.4%
2 percent slopes
Le Lenoir loam 0.1 0.0%
NoA Norfolk loamy fine sand,0 to 2 0.1 0.0%
percent slopes
NoB Norfolk loamy fine sand,2 to 6 45.4 3.6%
percent slopes
Ro Roanoke loam,frequently 93.6 7.3%
flooded
TaB Tarboro loamy sand,0 to 5 7.0 0.5%
percent slopes
WkB Wickham sandy loam,0 to 6 104.0 8.2%
percent slopes,rarely flooded
WnD Winton fine sandy loam,8 to 15 0.2 0.0%
percent slopes
WnF Winton fine sandy loam, 15 to 33.0 2.6%
60 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 1,274.9 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Martin County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmd
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Altavista and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altavista
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 8 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 12 to 35 inches: sandy clay loam
BC-35 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneOccasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ag—Augusta loam, occasionally flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmf
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Augusta and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Augusta
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A -0 to 9 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 9 to 19 inches: clay loam
Btg- 19 to 60 inches: clay loam
Cg- 60 to 80 inches: coarse sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Occasional None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces, depressions on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bb—Bibb loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmh
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 65 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils:20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
Cgl - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2- 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cgl -30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2- 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
BoB—Bonneau loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmj
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Bonneau and similar soils: 87 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bonneau
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E-9 to 24 inches: loamy sand
Btl -24 to 35 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2-35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ch—Chastain silt loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gml
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Chastain, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Chastain, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Slackwater areas on flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Silty and clayey alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 5 inches: silt loam
Bg-5 to 52 inches: silty clay
2Cg- 52 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CnA—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmm
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Conetoe and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Conetoe
Setting
Landform: Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium and/or fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E- 8 to 25 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 25 to 41 inches: sandy loam
BC-41 to 48 inches: loamy sand
C-48 to 90 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmv
Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 90 percent
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 7 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 13 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-40 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Woodington, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Le—Lenoir loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmx
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Lenoir, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Lenoir, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lenoir, Drained
Setting
Landform:Terraces, flats on broad interstream divides
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 3 inches: loam
E-3 to 8 inches: loam
Bt- 8 to 63 inches: clay
BCg- 63 to 80 inches: sandy clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Lenoir, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Terraces, flats on broad interstream divides
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 3 inches: loam
E-3 to 8 inches: loam
Bt- 8 to 63 inches: clay
BCg- 63 to 80 inches: sandy clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leaf, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform:Terraces, flats on broad interstream divides
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bethera, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Depressions, flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tomotley, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
NoA—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gmz
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 14 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt- 14 to 56 inches: sandy clay loam
BC-56 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
NoB—Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gn0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components:4 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 14 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt- 14 to 56 inches: sandy clay loam
BC-56 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Woodington, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ro—Roanoke loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gn4
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces, depressions on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A -0 to 7 inches: loam
Btg1 - 7 to 14 inches: silty clay loam
Btg2- 14 to 54 inches: clay
Cg- 54 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: Rare
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 9.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces, depressions on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 7 inches: loam
Btg1 - 7 to 14 inches: silty clay loam
Btg2- 14 to 54 inches: clay
Cg- 54 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 9.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gn8
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tarboro and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarboro
Setting
Landform: Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
Bw- 8 to 40 inches: loamy sand
C-40 to 100 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low(about 2.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
WkB—Wickham sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gnd
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wickham and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wickham
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 53 inches: sandy clay loam
C- 53 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
WnD—Winton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gnf
Elevation: 0 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Winton and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Winton
Setting
Landform: Escarpments on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 8 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 17 to 54 inches: clay loam
BC-54 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
30

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Nawney, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
WnF—Winton fine sandy loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3gng
Elevation: 0 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Winton and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Winton
Setting
Landform: Escarpments on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and sandy fluviomarine deposits
31

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A -0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 8 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 17 to 54 inches: clay loam
BC-54 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 60 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Nawney, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
32

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
33

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf
34

Property Location: Residential Property Record Card- Martin County 2017
2720 View Nicholson Rd Parcel ID:0500677 Account No: 51133 Class:A State Class: 100 Card 1 of 1
Current Owner Previous Owner History Miscellaneous Assessment Information
Havelock Drugstore Lle Name Deed Date Deed Info: (0-28/766)(06/16/2021)() Appraised: Current Prior
1500 Sunday Dr Suite 300 Coastal Forest Resources Comp T-28/129 10/21/2021 Zoning: Land: 613,140 248,500
Raleigh Nc 27607 Coastal Forest Resources Comp B-17/725 06/24/1998 Map Block Lot: 5768-95-4102 Use: 54,377 0
Neighborhood. 501 Building: 0 0
Total: 54,377 248,500
Fire District: F05 Assessed Information:
Notes Entrance Information Value: 54,377
Coburn Tract Date Time ID Actv Entrance Code Source
Effective DOV. 1/1/2017
Value Flag: FARM USE
Sales History
Book/Page Date Price Type Validity
0-28/766 06/16/2021 1,350,000 1 0
Permit Information
Date Permit# Price Purpose %Comp.
0
0
Land Information ■
Type Size Grade Influence Factor 1,2 and% Value Im is
Woodland A 30.5 90 Wa 0 39,810 No
Woodland A 507.48 80 Wa 0 457,170
Woodland A 117.75 70 Wa 0 116,160
■
Total Acres for this Parcel 655.73 Total Land Value 613,140
Av le
Out Building Information
Type Qty Year Size1 Size2 Grade Cond %Good Value
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0
0
Total OBY for this card 0 Inspection witness by:
•
:!• un ivers Printed Wed, Oct 27, 2021
(7ss.2)

Property Location: Residential Property Record Card- Martin County 2017
2720 View Nicholson Rd Parcel ID:0500677 Account No: 51133 Class:A State Class: 100 Card 1 of 1
Dwelling Information Replacement Costs
Style: Base Price: 0
Condo Style: Additions: 0
Exterior Walls: None Unfinished Area: 0 Descriptor/Area
Story Height: 0.0 Basement: 0
Attic: 0
Attic: Plumbing: 0
Interior/Exterior: Heating A/C Adj.: 0
Basement: None FBLA: 0
Bsmt Garage: 0 Rec Room: 0
Rec Room size: 0 0 Fire Place: 0
FBLA size: 0 0 Basement Garage: 0
Unfinished Area:0 Exterior Trim: 0
Subtotal: 0
Inlaw Apts: 0
WB Fireplace: Stacks 0 Openings 0 Grade Factor: 0.00
MTL Fireplace: Stacks 0 Openings 0 C&D Factor. 0.00
Total RCN: 0
Heating Type:
Fuel: Percent Good: 0.00
Heating System: Market Adj.: 0.00
Year Built: 0 Total RCNLD: 0
Eff. Yr Built: 0 ILL Addition Information
GFA/True GFA: 0 0
TLA/True TLA: 0 0 Low 1st 2nd 3rd Area Points
Basement Area: 0
Grade:
Condition:
CDU:
Building Notes:
Low 1st 2nd 3rd Tot
Rooms: 0 0 0 0 0 Owner/Values:Includes all Land/Buildings/OBYs for this Parcel
Bedrooms: 0 0 0 0 0 Current Cost Market Income Prior
Full Baths: 0 0 0 0 0 Land: 54,377 613,140 0 0 0
Half Baths: 0 0 0 0 0 Building: 0 0 0 0 0
Add7Fixtures: 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 54,377 613,140 0 0 248,500
Comparable Sales Summary Year Bed- Bath
Parcel ID Location DOS Price TLA Style Grade built room Full Half Acres
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

Property Location: Residential Property Record Card- Martin County 2017
23825 Nc 125 Parcel ID:0504927 Account No: 44814 Class:A State Class: 511 Card 3 of 3
Current Owner Previous Owner History Miscellaneous Assessment Information
Indiantown Farm Llc Name Deed Date Deed Info: (C-28/31)(07/17/2020)() Appraised: Current Prior
1500 Sunday Dr,Suite 300 Lassiter,W L Heirs U-04/523-24 06/14/1949 Zoning: Land: 875,210 903,610
Raleigh Nc 27607 Map Block Lot: 5778-10-5919 Use: 205,675 164,878
Neighborhood: 501 Building: 469,050 73,200
Total: 674,725 238,078
Fire District: F05 Assessed Information:
Notes Entrance Information Value: 674,725
Hunting Lodge Date Time ID Actv Entrance Code Source
Effective DOV: 1/1/2017
Value Flag: FARM USE
Sales History
Book/Page Date Price Type Validity
C-28/31 07/17/2020 1,100,000 2 0 "
Permit Information a '
Date Permit# Price Purpose %Comp.
10/08/2020 15909 Get House Pict. 0
09/03/2020 15807 check Bldings 0
Land Information
Type Size Grade Influence Factor 1,2 and% Value
Total Acres for this Parcel 683.99 Total Land Value
- _
Out Building Information
Type Qty Year Size1 Size2 Grade Cond %Good Value
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0 0 0 0 0% 0
0
0
Total OBY for this card 0 Inspection witness by:
•
:!• un ivers Printed Thu, Oct 7,2021
(7ss.2)

Property Location: Residential Property Record Card- Martin County 2017
23825 Nc 125 Parcel ID:0504927 Account No: 44814 Class:A State Class: 511 Card 3 of 3
Dwelling Information Replacement Costs
Style: Other Base Price: 131,200
Condo Style: Additions: 0
Exterior Walls: Wood Siding Unfinished Area: 0 Descriptor/Area
Story Height: 1.0 Basement: -4,000 27
A1 Fr
Attic: 0 058 s fk:
Attic: None Plumbing: -3,890
Interior/Exterior: Same Heating A/C Adj.: 3,790
Basement: Crawl FBLA: 0 14
Bsmt Garage: 0 Rec Room: 0
Rec Room size: 0 0 Fire Place: 0
FBLA size: 0 0 Basement Garage: 0
Unfinished Area:0 Exterior Trim: 0
Inlaw Apts: 0 Subtotal: 127,100 7
WB Fireplace: Stacks 0 Openings 0 Grade Factor: 0.90 $ 1 Fr
MTL Fireplace: Stacks 0 Openings 0 C&D Factor. 0.00
Heating Type: Central A/C Total RCN: 114,390
Fuel. Electric Percent Good: 1.00
00: 0.
Heating System: Heat Pump Market Adj. 24
Year Built: 2020 Total RCNLD: 80,070
Eff. Yr Built. 0
G Addition Information
FA/True GFA: 858 858
TLA/True TLA: 858 858 Low 1st 2nd 3rd Area Points
Basement Area: 0
Grade: C- 20
Condition: Average
CDU: AV
Building Notes:
Low 1st 2nd 3rd Tot
Rooms: 0 0 0 0 3 Owner/Values:Includes all Land/Buildings/OBYs for this Parcel
Bedrooms: 0 0 0 0 0 Current Cost Market Income Prior
Full Baths: 0 0 0 0 0 Land: 205,675 875,210 0 0 164,878
Half Baths: 0 0 0 0 0 Building: 469,050 469,050 0 0 73,200
Add7Fixtures: 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 674,725 1,344,260 0 0 238,078

Jurisdictional Determination Request
M.
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.LM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D,E,F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street address: 2720 View Nicholson Rd
City, State: Williamston, NC
County: Martin County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0500677, 0504927
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
WetlandNC•com
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Havelock Drugstore LLC
Mailing Address: 1500 Sunday Dr Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1,the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agent'
3-22-2023
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑✓ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary"in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 ,274 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.892157
Longitude: -77069533
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
a Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑� Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatoM/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard-copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale)that is no larger than 11"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling(the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s)used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
❑ Jurisdictional non-wetland waters (non-wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW),pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area(using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non-linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non-linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual,33 C.F.R.part328 and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
�✓ be at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey(metes and bounds).
�✓ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: View Nicholson Road city/county: Martin Sampling Date: 12/08/2022
Applicant/Owner: Martin V State: NC Sampling Point: PP2
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Wllllamston
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): HIIISIope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex slope(%): 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.889849 Long: -77069533 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: AaA—Altavista fine sand y loam, 0 to 2 percent sloe NW]classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeah Yes= No= (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or H yd rology=sig n ifi ca ntly disturbed'=Are"Normal Circumstances°present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation=Soil=or Hydrology=naturally problematic?=(If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No=
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No� is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes= No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) =Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
=Surface Water(Al) =Aquatic Fauna(B13) =Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
=High Water Table(A2) =Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) =Drainage Patterns(131 D)
=Saturation(A3) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) =Mass Trim Lines(1316)
=Water Marks(81) =Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) =Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
=Sediment Deposits(132) =Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) =Crayfish Burrows(C8)
=Drift Deposits(133) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(B4) =Thin Muck Surface(C7) =Geomorphic Position(D2)
=Iron Deposits(85) =Other(Explain in Remarks) =ShaIIowAquitard(D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) =FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
F—iWater-Stained Leaves(Bg) Sphagnum moss(138)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes= No Q Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pant: PP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
wee Rtrahim /Plrf size 25ft x 25ft o/ Cover _Specie,? Status
1 FAC 20% Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 10
That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
2 FACW 20% YPS FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 FAC 5% Nn_ FAC Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4. - -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6. -
45 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 22.5 20%of total cover: 9 Total%Cover of MultiglyhY_
.S8DIIno Strahim (plot size: 25ft x 25ft OBL species x 1 = 0
1 FAC/FACW- 5% Yes FAC/FA FACW species x 2= 0
2 FAC 10% Yes FAC FAC species x 3= 0
3 _ _ FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ _ UPL species x 5= 0
-
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6. - Prevalence Index —B/A= NaN
15 —Total Cover H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Si Strahim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1 FAC 3% Yes FAC 1
3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0
2 FAC 5% Yes FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3.-
4.- 11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.- be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6.- - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
8 =Total Cover Tree—Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 1•6 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 FACW- 5% Yes FAQW Sapling—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 - - approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 _ _ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6..- - Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
3 ft(1 m)in height.
10.-
Woody vine—All woody vines,regardless of height.
11.- -
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2•5 20%of total cover: 1
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.FAC 1L°o— Yes EAC
2,FACW-UPL 1% Yes FACW
3.FAC 2% Yes FAC
4.- -
5. Hydrophytic
4 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 0.g
Present? Yes No=
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: PP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 100% SiL
3-15 10YR 6/4 100% SiL
15-24 10YR 7/3 100% SiL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) ❑2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) HPiedmont
Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 15313)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑_ Marl(F10)(LRR U) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑_ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑_ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O, P,T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) ❑_ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,15013)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface(37)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= NoR:1
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: View Nicholson Road city/county: Martin Sampling Date: 12/08/2022
Applicant/Owner: Martin V State: NC Sampling Point: PP2
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Wllllamston
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): HIIISIope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex slope(%): 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.889849 Long: -77069533 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: AaA—Altavista fine sand y loam, 0 to 2 percent sloe NW]classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeah Yes= No= (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or H yd rology=sig n ifi ca ntly disturbed'=Are"Normal Circumstances°present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation=Soil=or Hydrology=naturally problematic?=(If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No=
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No� is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes= No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) =Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
=Surface Water(Al) =Aquatic Fauna(B13) =Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
=High Water Table(A2) =Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) =Drainage Patterns(131 D)
=Saturation(A3) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) =Mass Trim Lines(1316)
=Water Marks(81) =Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) =Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
=Sediment Deposits(132) =Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) =Crayfish Burrows(C8)
=Drift Deposits(133) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(B4) =Thin Muck Surface(C7) =Geomorphic Position(D2)
=Iron Deposits(85) =Other(Explain in Remarks) =ShaIIowAquitard(D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) =FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
F—iWater-Stained Leaves(Bg) Sphagnum moss(138)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes= No Q Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pant: PP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 25ft x 25ft ) %Cover _S ecp ies? _Status Number of Dominant Species
1 FAC 20% Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 10 (A)
2 FACW 20% Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 FAC 5% No FAC Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4. -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6. -
45 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 22.5 20%of total cover: 9 Total%Cover of: Multiply bY_
25ft x 25ft OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) o species x 2= 0 FACW s
1 FAC/FACW- 5/o Yes FAC/F� p
2 FAC 1070 YeS FAC FAC species x 3= 0
3 _ _ FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ _ UPL species x 5= 0
-
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6. - Prevalence Index =B/A— NaN
15 =Total Cover H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plat size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. FAC 3% Yes FAC 3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
2. FAC 5% YeS FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.4.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5. - be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6. - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
8 =Total Cover Tree—Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 1.6 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 FACW- 5% Yes FACW Sapling—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 - - approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
4. - Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.-- _ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6. - Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
8._ - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9. - -
Woody vine—All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.- -
11.- -
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2•5 20%of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.FAC 1% Yes FAC
2,FACW-UPL 1% Yes FACW
3.FAC 2% Yes FAC
4.- -
5. Hydrophytic
4 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 0.8
Present? Yes No=
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: PP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 100% SiL
3-15 10YR 6/4 100% SiL
15-24 10YR 7/3 100% SiL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) ❑2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) HPiedmont
Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 15313)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑_ Marl(F10)(LRR U) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑_ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑_ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O, P,T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) ❑_ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,15013)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface(37)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= NoR:1
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0