Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230809_TE_Study Oak Island Sand Mine Threatened and Endangered Species Report Prepared for: Mr. Russell Carter Oak Island Ptnr. LLC, Oak Island Land and Timber, LLC 806 N. 23rd St. Wilmington,NC 28405 Prepared By: Southern Environmental Group,Inc. 5315 South College Road, Suite E Wilmington,NC 28412 (910)452-2711 June 2, 2023 1.0 Introduction This Endangered Species Report has been requested by Oak Island Ptnr. LLC and Oak Island Land and Timber,LLC,to determine whether protected species are located within the subject site,herein referred to as the Oak Island Sand Mine. 2.0 Site Location The subject site is shown below, and is indicated by a blue border: Figure 1: Aerial photo of subject site The 172.15-acre subject site is located north of U.S. Highway 17, 1.9 miles NW down an unimproved road referred to as South U.S. 17 on current street maps, in Hampstead,Pender County,North Carolina. 3.0 Site Description The subject site can be characterized as a long leaf pine savannah/pocosin mosaic, which is comprised of tree species including long-leaf pine (Pious palustris), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), pond pine (Pinus serotina), swamp gum (Nyssa aquatica), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and red maple (Acer rubrum), and bay trees in the genera Persea, Gordonia, and Magnolia, along with understory species including tall gallberry(Ilex coriacea),titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), and fedder bush(Lyonia lucida). Woody vines are extensive, and include muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), yellow jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens), and green briars of the genera Smilax. 4.0 Protected Species According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered Species website and data taken from their IPaC Trust Resources Report(see Attachment A), 12 protected species, 1 proposed endangered, 2 and 1 candidate species are known to occur in Pender County. From review of the habitat requirements of the listed plants and animals for Pender County,it was determined that there is the potential for occurrence of 5 of the listed species within the subject site. The listed species include: the Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis); Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi); Golden Sedge (Carex lutea) and the rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). 5.0 Investigative Methods Our firm's experienced biologists have conducted extensive on-site field investigations for wetlands and protected species within all parts of the subject site. 6.0 Baseline Information on the Listed Species 6.1 Northern long-eared bat According to the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,the northern long-eared bat is a medium-sized bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length but with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. They hibernate in caves and mines. They may be found swarming in surrounding wooded areas in autumn. During late spring and summer this species roosts and forages in upland forests. 6.2 Red-cockaded woodpecker For nesting/roosting,this species needs open stands of pine containing trees 60 years old and older. These birds need older, live pines, in which they excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines are most used, but other species of southern pine, such as pond pine (Pinus serotina) are also acceptable. Dense stands(stands that are primarily hardwoods, or that have a dense hardwood understory)are avoided.Generally,foraging habitat is found in pine and pine-hardwood stands,with trees 30 years old and older, with foraging preferences for pine trees six inches or larger in DBH. In good, moderately stocked pine habitat, sufficient foraging substrate can be found on 80 to 125 acres. 6.3 Cooley's meadowrue According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooley's meadowrue occurs in moist to wet bogs and savannas. It grows along fire plow lines,roadside ditches,woodland clearings, and power line rights-of-way, and needs some type of disturbance to maintain its open habitat. Plants often found growing with the meadowrue include tulip poplar growing with cypress and/or Atlantic white cedar (Leonard 1987). 6.4 Golden Sedge Golden sedge grows in sandy soils overlying coquina limestone deposits, where the soil pH is unusually high for this region,typically between 5.5 and 7.2. Soils supporting the species are very wet to periodically shallowly inundated. The species prefers the ecotone (narrow transition zone between two diverse ecological communities) between the pine savanna and adjacent wet hardwood or hardwood/conifer forest. Most plants occur in the partially shaded savanna/swamp where occasional, to frequent fires favor an herbaceous ground layer and suppress shrub dominance. Other species with which this sedge grows include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), red maple (Acer rubrum), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), colic root (Aletris farinosa), and several species of beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.). At most sites, golden sedge shares its habitat with Cooley's meadowrue and with Thome's beakrush (Rhynchospora thornei), a species of concern in N.0 3 6.5 Rough-leaved loosestrife This species generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between long leaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty,poorly drained soil) (Barry 1980),on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand. Rough-leaved loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of large Carolina bays(shallow,elliptical,poorly drained depressions of unknown origin)(Matthews et al., 1980). The grass-shrub ecotone,where rough-leaved loosestrife is found,is fire-maintained, as are the adjacent plant communities (long leaf pine - scrub oak, savanna, flatwoods, and pocosin). Suppression of naturally occurring fire in these ecotones results in shrubs increasing in density and height and expanding to eliminate the open edges required by this plant. 7.0 Findings 7.1 Northern long-eared bat The Northern long-eared bat roosts in trees or buildings in the warmer months, rarely in caves. However, in winter, it uses caves and other heavily sheltered spots almost exclusively. In the Coastal Plain, it roosts inside hollow trees or other openings inside tree trunks. There are no sweetgum(the preferred roost tree type,according the USFWS data)located across the subject site. No northern long-eared bats were observed during our site inspection. 7.2 Red-cockaded woodpecker According to the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Element Occurrence database, the closest occurrence is 3.8 miles southwest of the subject site.The subject site has a dense understory and lacks pine trees of the appropriate age and size.No RCW nests or live birds, cavities,or starts were observed on or adjacent to the subject site. It is our opinion that mining activity is not likely to adversely impact nest activity or foraging resources of red-cockaded woodpeckers. 7.3 Cooley's meadowrue Most of the forest within the subject site has been managed by timbering multiple times within the last century. No other management of the site has occurred, including lack of fire, resulting in a generally dense understory across the subject site. The wetland types present on-site don't have the necessary habitat components required for this species.No Cooley's meadowrue was found during site surveys. It is our opinion that mining activity is not likely to adversely impact Cooley's meadowrue. 7.4 Golden Sedge According to the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Element Occurrence database, the closest occurrence is 5.5 miles northwest of the subject site. Most of the forest within the subject site has been managed by timbering multiple times within the last century. The subject site lacks the frequent fires required of this species to maintain an open understory.The area is not overlaying shallow limestone deposits. No golden sedge was found during the site survey. It is our opinion that mining activity is not likely to adversely impact the golden sedge. 7.5 Rough-leaved loosestrife Most of the forest within the subject site has been managed by timbering multiple times within the last century. The subject site lacks the frequent fires required of this species to maintain an open understory. The wetland type present on-site does not have the necessary habitat components required for this species. No rough-leaved loosestrife was found during the site survey. It is our opinion that mining activity is not likely to adversely impact rough-leaved loosestrife. 4 8.0 Summary The subject site was evaluated to determine the presence or absence of protected plant and animal species, namely the Northern long-eared bat, red-cockaded woodpecker, Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge, and the rough-leaved loosestrife. There were no roost trees or hollow trees observed within the subject site suitable for the Northern long-eared bat. Thus, it is anticipated that no impact to Northern long-eared bats will occur as a result of development of the subject site. There were no red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees or starts found with the limits of subject site. Thus, it is anticipated that no impact to woodpecker cavity trees, starts, or foraging resources will occur as a result of development of the subject site. The preferred habitat of the listed plant species is generally found within the limits of the site, however, none of the protected plants were found within the subject site. With that, it is anticipated that no impact to Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge, or the rough-leaved loosestrife will occur as a result of mining the subject site. 5 Appendix A IPaC Trust Resources Report 6 pfr pax F7:#i4 uPe NEFm IrE United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE '0-9CH 3k$5 Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh,NC 27636-3726 Phone: (919)856-4520 Fax: (919)856-4556 In Reply Refer To: May 17, 2023 Project Code: 2023-0082658 Project Name: Oak Island Sand Mine Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys should be conducted to determine the species'presence or absence within the project area. The use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 05/17/2023 2 species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA)to protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php. 05/17/2023 3 We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List • Migratory Birds 05/17/2023 1 OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 (919) 856-4520 05/17/2023 2 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code: 2023-0082658 Project Name: Oak Island Sand Mine Project Type: Subsurface Extraction - Non Energy Materials Project Description: Sand Mine Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/(a)34.50124355,-77.59282757094837,14z 5 5 5 5 ' 5 nry1_ 5 5 5 5 5 Counties: Pender County, North Carolina 05/17/2023 3 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 14 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. 1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. MAMMALS NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 BIRDS NAME STATUS Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations]-Wherever found,except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864 Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile:httpss:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 05/17/2023 4 REPTILES NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened) Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened Population:North Atlantic DPS There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199 Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523 Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened Population:Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 INSECTS NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 FLOWERING PLANTS NAME STATUS Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281 Golden Sedge Carex lutea Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6025 Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747 CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 05/17/2023 5 YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S)MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. 05/17/2023 MIGRATORY BIRDS Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Brown-headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird Conservation 15 Regions(SCRs)in the continental USA Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental 31 USA and Alaska. Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental 31 USA and Alaska. 05/17/2023 NAME BREEDING SEASON Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental Sep 10 USA and Alaska. PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence (■) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort(see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. 05/17/2023 3 No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. ■probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC BNuthach CC tBCRed ———— ---- IIII IIII IIII IIII III' ---- --I- ---- ---- ---- Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide ---- ---- ---- 11 - IIII IIII IIII ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (CON) Prothoneotary Warbl __-- _--- ---- IIII IIII IIII IIII ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker ———— ———— ———— ——— -- ———— ———— ———— BCC Rangewide (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species ■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librur / collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds ■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area.When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits 05/17/2023 may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator(RAIL)Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 05/17/2023 5 2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 05/17/2023 6 should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. 05/17/2023 7 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency: Southern Environmental Group, Inc. Name: David Scibetta Address: 5315 S. College Road Suite E City: Wilmington State: NC Zip: 28412 Email dscibetta@segi.us Phone: 9104522711