20230721_NOI_NPDES

■ BARNHILL
CONTRACTING
COMPANY
800 Tiffany Blvd.,Suite 200
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
252-823-1021 phone
www.barnhillcontracting.com
July 20, 2023
Mr. Bradley Bennett
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Mitchell Pit
NPDES Permit Application
Dear Mr. Bennett,
I am respectfully submitting an application for an NPDES discharge permit for a borrow pit in
Martin County.An on-site determination of potential jurisdictional features was performed by the
Davey Resource Group.The location of the wetlands and the proposed buffers are also shown on the
enclosed site plan.
Barnhill Contracting Company proposes to pump water from a rim ditch into the dewatering
basin as shown on the mine map during the initial start of the excavation.This basin has been designed
for a 1,000 gallons per minute pump and a detention time of 2 days. Once this area is mined of its
material, it will then be used for storage of dewatering from the next phase of the mining area. Water
will be pumped into the basin and pond utilizing a 6" submersible pump (Thompson Pump Model
46HST) at an average rate of approximately 650 gallons per minute. This pit will be operated for Barnhill
Contracting projects only and will not be run on a continual basis. Use will be determined by demand
for sand for local projects. Because of the nature of this work,withdrawal rates and discharge will vary
greatly from month to month. We intend to dewater only when we are actively mining sand and not on
a continuous basis. During times of mining we will typically work 12 hour days and pump during those
times. Therefore, any discharges will be kept to a minimum. We have also applied for a CCPCUA
withdrawal permit through division of Water Resources since this site is within Martin County.
Erosion control measures will be installed onsite prior to any land disturbance taking place.
Please reference the site plan for a more detailed depiction of these measures. Any water within the
mining area will be directed to drain towards the pit.

800 Tiffany Blvd.,Suite 200
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
252-823-1021 phone
www.barnhillcontracting.com
Please find enclosed one(1)original and two (2)copies of the NPDES Notice of Intent Permit
Application and supporting documents. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Yours Very Truly,
Barnhill Contracting Company
DuAoi;tv Avm&*ve,1,
Mine Manager
Enclosures

FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources/ Ye° I Moath Day
Land Quality Section—Stormwater Permitting Program cert.1 1 earca e
cn
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pe Amount
EnvironmentalQuality NCG020000 Pennil Assigned o
NOTICE OF INTENT— General Permit Application
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000:
STORMWATER AND/OR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry(except as specified below) and
like activities
The following activities are included:
• Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits—except for NCDOT borrow pits)that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate
products,finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations;
• Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities (VMA) at mining operations;
• Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or
• Mine dewatering (wastewater)
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
• Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining;
• Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from concrete
operations;
• Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and
• Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
• NCDOT borrow pits (covered under individual permit NCS000150)
The following discharges are covered by NPDES-general Permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000:
Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in-stream sand mining operations(sand dredging
or dipping operations)are covered instead by NPDES General Permit NCG520000, administered by the Division
of Water Resources NPDES Wastewater Permitting Program. Please contact DWR for more information.
Please print or type all entries in this application form.
1) Mailing address of owner/operator(official address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed):
Legal Owner Name BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY
(Attach the most recent Annual Report to the NC Secretary of State showing the current legal name of the corporation or entity.
Alternatively this permit can be given to an individual or government authority. This name must be the same name as appears on the
Division of Energy,Mineral,and Land Resources'Mining Permit.)
Signee's Name (assigned for in question 41. at end) SHANNON K.DOUGLAS
Street Address 841 SUN GRO DR
City ELIZABETH CITY State NC ZIP Code 27909
Telephone No. 252 384-2122 E-mail [e-mail]
Alternate Contact Name' DUSTIN FAULKNER E-mail (if different)
Alternate Contact Telephone (if different) 252 384-2126 [e-mail]
`Alternate contact should be affiliated with the Owner/Operator. Consultant information can be provided
in question 5.
Page 1 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name MITCHELL PIT
Facility Street Address 1404 GRAND CANYON RD
Facility City WILLIAMSTON State NC ZIP Code 27892
Facility County MARTIN COUNTY
Facility Contact DUSTIN FAULKNER
Telephone No. 252 384-2126 Fax: [phone]
Contact E-mail [e-mail]
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility(use street names, state road numbers,and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). FROM WILLIAMSTON,HEAD SOUTH ON HWY 17 FOR
+/-4.0 MILES. THEN TAKE A LEFT ON MILL INN RD FOR+/-1.2 li 5 N707 0 . HE
DESTINATION,MITCHELL PIT,WILL BE ON YOUR LEFT&RIGHT+/-0.5 MILES DOWN GRAND CANYON RD.
4) Facility Location Coordinates:
Latitude 35.774211 N Longitude -77.047600 W (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal
degrees)
5) Consultant Information(if applicable):
Consultant:
Consulting Firm: (Optional)
Mailing Address: Staple Business Card Here
City:
State: Zip Code:
Phone: ( Fax: �)
E-mail:
Permits:
6) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
0 New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin: WINTER 2026
❑ Existing Date began mining:
7) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code(SIC Code)that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility SIC Code: 1 4 4 2
8) Provide a description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: SAND,CLAY,AND EARTHEN MATERIALS
9) Is this a PROCESSING-ONLY facility for materials mined elsewhere? 0 No ❑ Yes
10) Is this an inactive mine site?
© No
❑ Yes If yes, have you certified to the Stormwater Permitting Program that all portions of the site where
clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities have occurred have been stabilized?
❑ No ❑ Yes (If yes,the site may be eligible for"Dormant Status"and reduced BMP
inspections. See the General Permit.)
Page 2 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
11) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from DEMLR's Land Quality Section?
APPLICATION CURRENTLY UNDER
0 No If no, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: REVIEW-SUBMITTED 6/9/23
❑ Yes If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number: Also provide a copy of
the DEMLR Mining Permit with this NPDES application.
12) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
13) Are you applying for a discharge permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, specify permit number and mine name if known:
14) Does this facility have any Non-Discharge permits from DWR(e.g., recycle permits)?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non-Discharge permits for this facility:
15) Does total area of this mine site include ready-mixed concrete plant and/or asphalt plant areas?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, do they have separate NPDES stormwater permits? ❑ No ❑ Yes (provide permit
number(s)
If not owned by the same company,who is the owner?
Development Activities and Buffers:
16) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
0 No
❑ Yes
17) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties,and will it add more than 10,000 ft2 of
impervious surface?
❑ Yes(to both)
❑ No,this mine site IS in one of the 20 Coastal Counties but will NOT add 10,000 ft2 of impervious surface.
0 No,this mine site is NOT in any of the 20 Coastal Counties.
if this site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties,you may be required to apply for an additional State
Stormwater Permit. Check with your local Regional Office(see contact information and checklist below).
18) Is this mine located the Neuse,Tar-Pamlico, or Catawba River Basins, or the Randleman or Jordan
Water supply Watersheds?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes,what size stream buffers are included on site? ft. You must show buffers on site
plans. Also include information and plans showing diffuse flow through buffers as required.
Page 3 of 12
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Discharge Points, Receiving Waters & Wetlands:
19) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water(creek, stream, river, lake, etc.)that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges will end up in? FROM SOURCE TO ONSITE WETLANDS,FROM ONSITE
WETLANDS TO SMITHWICK CREEK.
To find the waterbody, please see the NC Surface Waterbody Classifications map at
hftps://deq.n c.gov/a bo ut/d ivis ions/water-resou rces/water-resou rces-science-data
Receiving water classification(s)for the waters: C
If the site will discharge to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm sewer
system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). N/A
Discharge of wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-II through WS-V, or SA, must be
approved by the Division of Water Resources (DWR) or Division of Marine Fisheries
(DMF). DEMLR cannot grant coverage under NCG020000 without that approval. Also be advised that
no new discharges of Wastewater are permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or
freshwater ORW. Wastewater discharges to saltwater ORW will not be approved under General Permit
NCG02 but may be eligible for an individual permit.
20) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to waters classified as High Quality Waters
(HQW), Primary Nursery Areas (PNA), Trout(Tr)waters, or a class with a symbol like "+" or"@"that
denotes a special management strategy is in place?
M No ❑ Yes, HQW* ❑ Yes, includes "+" or
❑ Yes, PNA* ❑ Yes, Trout(Tr)
21) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to waters classified as Shellfish (SA)waters?
O No
❑ Yes, SA*
*For questions 19-20, be advised that the NCG02 General Permit limits the discharge volume of total combined
wastewaters to 50 percent of the receiving water in-stream flow under 7Q 10 conditions in HQW waters (PNA and
SA waters are considered HQW by definition). You may be required to contact USGS to obtain a 7Q10 flow.
22) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to impaired waters, or to waters with an
approved "Total Maximum Daily Load" (TMDL)?
To find impaired waters &TMDLs, please see the Impaired Waters Map & TMDL map on
https://deq.nc.gov/a bo ut/d ivi s io ns/water-resou rces/water-resources-science-data
❑v No
❑ Yes, these waters are impaired for(list pollutants):
❑ Yes, these waters have a TMDL for(list pollutants):
Page 4 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
23) List discharge points(outfalls)that convey discharge from the mine site(both on-site and off-site)and
location coordinates. Attach additional sheets if necessary,or note that this information is specified
on the site plan. Include proposed maximum daily flow rate for each wastewater outfall.
You must show all discharge points clearly on the submitted site plan. Be advised
that NCDEQ may require you to apply for an individual permit, based on proposed
discharge rates and receiving stream conditions (low flows, impairments, etc.)
Stormwater
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Stormwater Outfaff No.
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Mine Dewatering
Mine Dewatering(Wastewater) Outfall No. 1
Proposed maximum flow rate: 650 GAL/MIN
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): 35.773709 N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): -77.045312 W
Mine Dewatering(Wastewater) Outfall No.
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Process Wastewater
Process Wastewater Outfall No. Wastewater Description:
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Process Wastewater Outfall No. Wastewater Description:
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): N
Longitude(degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): W
Page 5of12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
24) Help us understand what will happen to the dewatering water at this mine site:
❑ NIA—this mine is not dewatering at all and will not dewater in the future.
a) Will this mine be dewatering and discharging to waters of the state? (Answer only if dewatering)
❑ No
0 Yes If yes,where to? 0 Surface Waters and/or Wetlands(on-site or off-site)
❑ Other(on-site or off-site) Describe:
b) Will this mine be dewatering but not discharging to waters of the state? (Answer only if dewatering)
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed:
25) Are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the mine pit perimeter?
❑ No
✓0 Yes If yes,what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter? 50 feet.
26) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or other waterbodies,and will dewatering
potentially impact any wetlands or other waterbodies?
❑ No, dewatering will not occur near(within 400')of wetlands or other waterbodies(e.g.,streams, lake, etc.)
0 Yes,dewatering will be near wetlands or other waterbodies
Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that
have the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (POM) Plan that has been approved by the
Department.
For sites that may drain wetlands—approval of a POM Plan may be required prior to coverage under
this permit. The POM Plan should be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office and in all cases must be
approved prior to operation.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1)Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the effect of
pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2)Detailed plans to maintain
surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance. See checklist at the end of the
application. Contact the Regional Office for questions speck to your mine.
27) Have you been required to obtain 4041401 Certification permits?
0 No
❑ Yes if yes,please briefly describe below(include information such a required mitigation, BMPs,
setbacks, and/or O&M plans for on or off-site wetlands or other pertinent information). Attach other sheets as
necessary.
BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY HAS NOT BEEN REQUIRED TO OBTAIN 404/401 CERTIFICATION,HOWEVER
WE HAVE GOTTEN AN ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE 404 WETLANDS AND
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US. THIS REPORT IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REFERENCE.DISCHARGING INTO
WATERS OF THE STATE WILL BE LIMITED.ONCE EXCAVATION HAS MADE ENOUGH PROGRESS BARNHILL WILL
PUMP INTO EXCAVATED AREAS ONSITE.
Page 6 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I. **SEE ENCLOSED ENVIRONMENTAL**
EVALUATION WE HAD PERFORMED
28) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
0 No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission.
Stormwater BMPs and Vehicle Maintenance:
29) Does this facility employ best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No ❑O Yes If yes, please briefly describe: DIVERSION DITCHES WILL BE INSTALLED,ALONG
THE HAUL ROAD,TO DIRECT THE STORMWATER RUNOFF THROUGH CHECK DAMS. BERMS&DIVERSION
DITCHES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE MINING AREA TO CONTAIN ALL WATER
INSIDE THE MINING AREA AND ALL WATER WILL BE DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BASIN.
30) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0 No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented?
31) Are vehicle maintenance activities (VMA) occurring or planned at this mine site?
r❑ No El Yes, If yes, will VMA area runoff discharge into the wastewater treatment system(s)?
❑ No, VMA runoff will discharge separately through a stormwater ouffall
❑ Yes, VMA runoff will drain back to the mine pit or other wastewater system
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
32) Will mine dewatering occur? (Yes, we are asking about dewatering again.)
❑ No
❑✓ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water? YES
33) Will this facility wash mined materials?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water?
34) Will discharges of process wastewater treatment systems occur(including possible recycle system
overflows)?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, describe what kind of systems:
35) Will this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes, provide the name, manufacturer, and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical
additive (if known):
Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North Carolina:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/d ivisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-perm its/stormwater-permits/
construction-sw
36) Will any of the wastewater treatment facilities at this mine overflow only during rainfall events that
exceed the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event?
❑ Yes If yes, which treatment systems are those?
No, all wastewater treatment facilities will discharge more frequently(i.e., during smaller rain events)
Page 7 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
37) Are wastewater treatment facilities(including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
0 No
❑ Yes
38)A Wastewater treatment alternatives review is required by 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c)(2)
for any new or expanding water pollution control facility discharges in North Carolina. You may
attach additional sheets. List the types of wastewater this mine site will discharge:
El Mine Dewatering
❑ Process Wastewater(such as washing or recycle system overflows,other mining activity wastewater)
a) What wastewaters were considered for this alternatives review? 0 Dewatering ❑ Process WW
b) Connection to a Municipal or Regional Sewer Collection System:
I) Are there existing sewer lines within a one-mile radius? ..................................... ❑Yes ✓a No
(1) If Yes,will the wastewater treatment plant(WWTP)accept the wastewater? ....❑ Yes 0 No
(a) If No, please attach a letter documenting that the WWTP will not accept the wastewater.
(b) If Yes, is it feasible to connect to the WWTP? Why or why not?*
c) Closed-loop Recycle System(meets design requirements of 15A NCAC 2T.1000):
i) Are you already proposing a closed-loop recycle system (CLRS)? ......................... ❑ Yes 0 No
(1) If Yes,for what type of wastewater at this mine site? ❑ Dewatering ❑ Process WW
(2) If No, is this option technologically feasible(possible)? Why or why not?*
A CLRS IS NOT TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE BASED ON THIS SITE IS IN A RURAL COUNTY WITH
LIMITED RESOURCES.
(3) If No, is it otherwise feasible to build a CLRS at this site? Why or why not?*
A CLRS IS NOT FEASIBLE BECAUSE IT WOULD BE TO COSTLY FOR THE AMOUNT OF DISCHARGE
THAT WILL TAKE PLACE. SINCE THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT WILL BE DISCHARGED WILL
SOLELY BE BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA,OUR NEED
TO DISCHARGE WILL VARY GREATLY.
(4) What is the feasibility of building a CLRS compared to direct surface water discharge?*
AS STATED ABOVE,THE NEED TO DISCHARGE WILL VARY GREATLY FROM MONTH TO MONTH.
BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY WILL ONLY BE PUMPING WHEN WE ARE ACTIVELY MINING.
d) Surface or Subsurface Disposal System (e.g.,spray irrigation):
i) Is a surface or subsurface disposal technologically feasible(possible)? ..................... ❑ Yes El No
Why or Why not?* SINCE THE PIT IS LOCATED IN EDGECOMBE COUNTY,WHICH IS A RURAL
AGRICULTURAL BASED COUNTY,IT WOULD NOT BE TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE DUE TO THE COST
AND THE VARIANCE IN THE NEED TO DISCHARGE BASED OFF OF THE NEED.
ii) Is a surface or subsurface disposal system otherwise feasible to implement?*............ ❑ Yes ® No
Why or Why not?*BECAUSE OF THE SURROUNDING LAND ACTIVELY BEING USED AS FARM LAND
BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY WOULD IMPACT MORE LAND IMPLEMENTING A SPRAY
-IRRIGATION SYSTEM THEN PUMPING INTO A DEWATERING BASIN AND THE WATER SPILLING OUT
THROUGH A RIP RAP SPILLWAY INTO AN ONSITE DITCH.
Page 8of12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
iii) What is the feasibility of employing a subsurface or surface discharge as compared to a direct
discharge to surface waters?* BECAUSE THE NEED TO DISCHARGE WILL VARY GREATLY,IT IS NOT
FEASIBLE TO EMPLOY A SUBSURFACE OR SURFACE DISCHARGE BECAUSE SOME MONTHS WE MAY
NOT DISCHARGE AT ALL. OUR DISCHARGE SOLELY DEPENDS ON THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
e) Direct Discharge to Surface Waters: Is discharge to surface waters the most environmentally sound
alternative of all reasonably cost-effective options for the wastewaters being considered?*
0 Yes ❑ No
f) If this review included all wastewater discharge types,would excluding some types(e.g. mine
dewatering)make any of the above non-discharge options feasible for some of the wastewaters?
❑ Yes Ell No
*Feasibility should take into account initial and recurring costs. You may be asked to provide
further information to support your answers to these questions after the initial review.
Other:
39) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
0 No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator(less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month)of
hazardous waste?
0 No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator(1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month)of
hazardous waste?
O No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s)of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
40) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? (See
permit text for secondary containment requirements.)
O No
❑ Yes
41) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
0 No
❑ Yes If yes,specify type: ❑ LCID(Land Clearing and Inert Debris) ❑ Other:
Page 9 of 12
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Final Checklist:
t'aThis application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and
Initialed for. Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each
space below.
Fee of$100 made payable to NCDEQ.
,ift IF Completed application and all supporting documents.
_of Copy of the valid approved mining permit(MP)for the facility or indication of MP application status.
-�F Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads.
Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams,wetlands,and other waters, etc.
O 2 copies of large-scale (minimum 24" x 3611) site plan with topographical lines with
all outfalls, applicable buffers and wetlands clearly delineated, receiving waters, and
100-year flood plain line if applicable.
A copy of your US Army Corps-approved wetland delineation if you marked"yes"to question 27 above.
A line drawing of the water flow through the facility or block flow diagram. A pictorial description of the
nature of any sources of water and any collection and treatment measures.
if mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties:
• Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State
Stormwater permit. Indicate the Regional Office Contact:
• Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages,sub-drainage
areas,and total drainage area.
If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands,or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater,
include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping Operation and
Monitoring(POM)Plan. An approved POM plan may be required prior to NCG02 issuance.
QC 2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans (at least 24" x 36") delineating areas on the
plans and listing acreage (including: wetlands, ditches, well-placements, pits,
borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater controls/BMPs, vehicle
maintenance areas, settling basins, product process (such as screening,
stockpiles, waste piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if
state SW programs apply), applicable buffers, and access and/or haul roads).
OF Pump dewatering size and information on its specifications.
_0 F Well information (design,depths, maintenance).
Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas.
Settling pond sizing information, if applicable.
Level spreader design, if applicable.
,_Details about dewatering method.
-Cone of influence calculations.
,Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding.
_QDescription and information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained.
N/ACopy of US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation(if
applicable).
_I have contacted my local regional office about a POM Plan. CALLED AND EMAILED ON 7/20/23.
Regional Office Contact: SCOTT GRABOSIU Date contacted:HAVE NOT RECEIVED A REPONSE.
-OR-
I will not impact any nearby wetlands,surface waters, or groundwaters by dewatering.
Page 10 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/1012015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b(1)provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement,representation,or certification in any application,record,report,plan,or other
document fled or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article;or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article;or who falsifies,tampers with,or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management]Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars($10,000).
41) Signatory Requirements(per 40 CFR 122.22)
All applications,reports,or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified.
a.All notices of intent to be covered under this General Permit shall be signed as follows:
(1)For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this permit,a responsible corporate officer means:(a)a president,
secretary,treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function,or any other person who performs similar
policy or decision making functions for the corporation,or(b)the manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities
employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million(in second quarter 1980 dollars),if
authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
(2)For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,respectively;or
(3)For a municipality,state,federal,or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official.
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit will
constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s)and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual
permit.
I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit:
1. I agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid mining
permit must be attached to this request.)
2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore.
3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection
so as to contain all spills on the site.
4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules governing
solid waste disposal.
5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not
result in contamination of the surface or ground waters.
I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete,and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: SHANNON K.DOUGLAS
Title: VICE PRESID
lvt/01�� L..... 7/20/2023
nature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for$100.00 made payable to NCDEQ.
Page 11 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Mail the entire package to:
DEMLR-Stormwater Program
Dept. of Environmental Quality
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee coverage under the NPDES
NCG02 General Permit. Upon review of the submittal, the Division may
determine that coverage under an individual permit is more appropriate. Also be
advised that renewed and continued coverage under NCG02 may be dependent
upon the permittee's compliance success and/or status of the receiving waters.
For questions,please contact the DEMLR/Land Quality Section Regional Office for your area.
DEMLR/Land Quality Section Regional Office Contact Information:
n an�5al
Asheville Office ....,. [phone] �./ ' '�I� . Wi e 1--- }---4`
Fayetteville Office ... [phone] /t;" t 1, { Raleigh
Mooresville Office ... [phone] f \
Raleigh Office ........ [phone] \)I
Washington Office ...[phone] ylO MaargsAle"
Wilmington Office ... [phone]
Winston-Salem ...... [phone] ''F a Mill`
Central Office .........[phone]
Page 12 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

Mitchell Pit - NPDES Aerial Map
4k
ITCHELL
a OCATION
t _
�t
bP ti
L
r
^s
to
Y
�h.tU
7!1912023,4:14:22 PM 1:15.703
Surface Water Classifications I 015 oI oI
NC Counties o 0.25 0.5 1 Nn
Major River Basins
Ht c,w.M...,

Mitchell Pit - USA Topo Map
rAN
— -- — — .L � + r ;��`' •Cam ..� .. \� -.. _ — ..`` ,�,.
raa MITCHELL PIT
.___. ... LOCATION _ ..
.rs � Cep ► ��� — � -- — .`
I
/
• l �
7/1912023,4:18:33 PM 1:20.288
0 02 0.4 DBmi
I 1 5
0 0.33 0.65 1.3 km
�WInyM,42Gly ynlnnnl f..ycYvc Sw:.•ry.wohM

} NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field
A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the U.S
Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site planning.
r � a .ay 1P>. ,f,£af4
•� i1 ra ....
arAtge
w
A
�-
4 '!
f
Legend i.
O
Approximate Project Area — 19 acres
Identified uplands — 19 acres `;'
Wetland boundary flagged (off-site for setbacks)
Approximate data sheet locations
Picture locations
L:\wetlands\2023\DRGCW23.175\maps\1404 Grand Canyon Rd—preliminary sketch.mxd 0 150 300 600
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. 0
Map Source:2020 NC OneMap ft
1404 Grand Canyon Rd
Martin County, NC DAVEY
Resource Group Section 404/401 Delineation
Map Date: 4/7123 3805 Wrightsville Avenue Preliminary Sketch
DRGNCW23.175 Wilmington,NC 28403
[phone]

Picture 1. Typical woodeduplands.
lt
q �� j t V dl 1 • Y � X 1'i �Y'- � � _'
if+• `'�! � y :� � 1 f ems•. T F
1 �
� R
�I

Picture 2. Typical field area uplands (note no ditches present)
V'?tAAO
- x
•��, 5^'•��r. � 2 M,�, :hie C � _'.. _ � _ _...
+ j ��w � r� .L�I ► 5�.�d'•+ 'vim`. Y
��,1 ' w `� +N��ir✓ '� aYr � w _( .Ely , =('r++-z� � ..

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#.0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TRA 0-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority.AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
ProjectlSite: 1404 Grand Canyon Road City/County: Martin Sampling Date: 4/11/23
Applicant/Owner: Barnhill State: NC Sampling Point: wetland
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): riverine drain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR T.MLRA 153A Lat: 35.773863 Long:-77.044927 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bonneau NWI classification: uplands
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that an-ply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) Drainage Patterns(1310)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
Water Marks(131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(62) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(133) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Thin Muck Surface(C7) x Geomorphic Position(132)
Iron Deposits(135) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X FAC-Neutral Test(135)
Water-Stained Leaves(69) Sphagnum Moss(138)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Surface water Is visible just not in sample area
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: wetland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Nyssa sylvatica 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant
4, Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
7, Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
80 =Total Cover OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
50%of total cover. 40 20%of total cover: 16 FACW species 10 x 2= 20
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' } FAC species 124 x 3= 372
1. Ligustrum sinense 5 No FAC FACU species 4 x 4= 16
2. Acerrubrum 20 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. 11ex opaca 15 Yes FAC Column Totals: 163 (A) 433 (B)
4_ Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.66
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7, X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
40 =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolafa 25 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Osmunda cinnamonea 8 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Arisaema tdphyllum 2 No FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. '-' height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tail.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
35 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 18 20%of total cover. 7 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r }
1. Toxicodendron radicans 4 Yes FAC
2. Parfhenocissus quinquefolia 4 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
8 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features I
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loe Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 2/2 100 Mucky Loam/Clay
'Type: C=Concentration.D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. kocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Blade Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B,153D) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,1SOB)
X 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P.T)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) Marl(F10)(LRR U) Red Parent Material(F21)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Coast Prairie Redox(Al6)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,15313)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 1SOA,1SOB) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T,U) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A In FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

'V. T' \.y.V Y�YR:,�J r. -l• �1 .l � i „`R�r '�:. W �3 w. -,!
1 L.
1
s

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET--Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20;the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (aurhorlty:.4R 335-15,paragraph s-2a)
Project/Site: 1404 Grand Canyon Road City/County: Martin Sampling Date: 4/11/23
Applicant/Owner: Barnhill State: NC Sampling Point: wetland
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): riverine drain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR T.MLRA 153A Lat: 35.773863 Long:-77.044927 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bonneau NWI classification: uplands
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secgndary Indicators(minimum of two reguired)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that arinlvl Surface Soil Cracks(86)
Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68)
X High Water Table(A2) Mari Deposits(1315)(LRR U) Drainage Patterns(1310)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(132) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(63) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Thin Muck Surface(C7) x Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(139) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capilla fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Surface water is visible just not in sample area
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: wetland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum {Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Nyssa sylvatica 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4, Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
7. Prevalence index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
80 =Total Cover OBL species 25 x 1= 25
50%of total cover: 40 20%of total cover: 16 FACW species 10 x 2= 20
Sanlinca/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) FAC species 124 x 3= 372
1. Ligustrum sinense 5 No FAC FACU species 4 x 4= 16
2. Acerrubrum 20 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Ilex opaca 15 Yes FAC Column Totals: 163 (A) 433 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.66
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
6. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7, X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
40 =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover. 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata 25 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Osmunda cinnamonea 8 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Arisaema h1phyllum 2 No� FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5 more in diameter at breast height(DBFI),regardless of
6. height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tali.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
35 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 18 20%of total cover. 7 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 4 Yes FAC
2. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 4 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
8 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 4 20%of total cover. 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loe Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 2/2 100 Mucky Loam/Clay
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining.M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Barrier Islands 1 cm Muds(S12) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B,153D) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,1508)
X 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Piedmont Floodplain Solis(1719)(LRR P,T)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Mari(1710)(LRR U) Red Parent Material(F21)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) Very Shallow Dark Surface(1722)
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(1712)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,1530)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
Poiyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T,U) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

Upland data sheet picture
a _
.� JAB+•.« . .� .`� � r I � v I �•. 1`
I
J'- Ala �l •\