153-08 EA for Bridge Harbor Marina 08/31/2009

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue James H. Gregson
Governor Director
August 31, 2009
MEMO TO: Melba McGee
FROM: Doug HuggettC��
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment for Bridge Harbor Marina Project, Beaufort County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Attached please find 9 copies of the Environmental Assessment for the referenced project. Our staff will
provide comments on the merits of the project itself as part of your SEPA review process. Please feel free to
contact me at 252-808-2808 if you have any questions concerning this matter.
By copy of this memo, I am also asking that the appropriate DCM field representative and district
planner review the project and provide me with comments within 21 days of the date of this memo.
Cc: David Moye (w/attachment)
John Thayer (w/attachment)
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Xiturally

LEGBND
EXISTING SAND SHOAL
y
� r SECTION 404 WETLAND
® SLATTED WOOD PIER/DECK/WALKWAY
PROPOSED IMPERNOUS AREA
4GK
BOAT SUPS: (133)
(2) 24' X 80' (SUPS 41 & 61)
(8 26 X 50' (SUPS 6-13)
((33)) 16' X 36' (SUPS 1-5, 14-27 & 47-60)
(86) 14' X 26' (SUPS 28-40, 42-46 & 84-131)
(2) STAGING AREA SUPS (SUPS 132-133)
NOTES:
1. AREA OF PROPOSED PIERS AND BOAT DROP OVER
PUBLIC TRUST WATERS;13,175 SQ.FT. (0.30 AC.)
A PIERS: 11.691 SQ.FT. (0.27 AC.)
B. BOAT DROP: 1.484 SQ.FT. (0.03 AC.)
2. AREA OF PRPOSED WETLANDS SHADING ASSOCIATED WITH
WATER -DEPENDENT WALKWAY: 1.342 SQ.FT. (0.03 AC.)
69
,1.25
69
N1.25
-4.25
ea cP J.
M>11.25
'__,_
E
a
�z
asp
dim o 0
yy
„M NN YMb�
Z
N
�ZNO 14
�N�
F W:i 'J
4JV V IOQ
�Nw'1M �=N Ni
•(]
V N C. O Q N N C
• Fja m oo
'�
ex
rx z y646
z
W O
W
__m
V F.
W W

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
FOR
BRIDGE HARBOR, LLC
A New Open -Water Marina on the Pamlico River
CITY OF WASHINGTON
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(Lead Agency, NC Division of Coastal Management)
Prepared by:
Ouible & Associates, PC
PO Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]; Fax:[phone]
[e-mail]
6-12-09 (draft submission to DCM only)
8-10-09 (revised for NCDENR review)

BRIDGE HARBOR, LLC - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Introduction
B. Permitted Work
C. Proposed Project Description
D. Purpose and Need of Proposed Project
E. Alternatives Analysis
1. Preferred Alternative -Open Water Marina (Project as Proposed)
2. Alternative If: Alternative II Open Water Marina
3. Alternative III: Other Open Water Marina Configurations
4. Alternative IV: No Action Alternative
F. Existing Environmental Characteristic of the Project Area
1. Topography
2. Soils
3. Land Use
4. Wetlands
5. Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas
7. Areas of Archaeological or Historic Value
8. Air Quality
9. Noise Levels
10. Water Resources (Surface Water and Groundwater)
11. Forest Resources
12. Shellfish and/or Finfish and Their Habitat
13. Wildlife and Natural Vegetation
G. Predicted Environmental Effects of the Project
1. Topography
2. Soils
3. Land Use
4. Wetlands
5. Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational and State Natural Areas
7. Areas of Archaeological or Historical Value
8. Air Quality
9. Noise Levels
10. Water Resources
11. Forest Resources
12. Shellfish and/or Finfish and Their Habitat
13. Wildlife and Natural Vegetation
14. Introduction of Toxic Substances
H. Secondary and Cumulative Impacts
1. Secondary Impacts
2. Cumulative Impacts
I. Mitigative Measures
J. State and Federal Permits Required
K. References

BRIDGE HARBOR, LLC — ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURE 1- USGS Topographic Vicinity Map
FIGURE 2- CAMA Major 153-08 Site Plan
FIGURE 3- Marina Plan (The Project as Proposed)
FIGURE 4- Proposed Boat Drop Schematic
FIGURE 5- Alternative II Plan
FIGURE 6- Permitted Grading Plan
FIGURE 7- Soil Map Overlay
ATTACHMENT A- USACE Nationwide 38 Permit (3/21/08)
ATTACHMENT B- DWQ Water Quality Certification (4/14/08)
ATTACHMENT C- CAMA Major 77-95 (6/15/95, Major Mod. 9/3/97)
ATTACHMENT D- DLQ SESCP Permit (4/16/08, modified 5/7/09)
ATTACHMENT E- DWQ General Stormwater Permit (5/19/08)
ATTACHMENT F- CAMA Major 153-08 (9/22/08)
ATTACHMENT G- Terracon Geotechnical Engineering Report (7/13/06)
ATTACHMENT H- SHPO Letter (2/2/09)
ATTACHMENT I- DMF Surface Water and Fisheries Maps
ATTACHMENT J- Letters from Quible to DMF and NMFS (5/5/09)
ATTACHMENT K- DMF Independent Gill Net Survey Data (2003-2007)

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
A. INTRODUCTION.
This Environmental Assessment Report (EA) has been prepared by Quible & Associates, P.C.
(Quible) on belhalf of Bridge Harbor, LLC to address the environmental characteristics and
potential impacts to existing conditions in relation to a proposed open water marina that includes
a boat dry stack with a boat drop. The subject property is herein referred to as the Bridge
Harbor Property or the Property.
This EA will be used as a decision making tool for assessment of whether the project will
receive a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or whether an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) will be required. A Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Permit
Application will be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM) once
a FONSI/EIS determination is obtained. Federal review of this project by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) will determine if the CAMA submission can be processed through a joint
review with the state, or whether a separate USACE Individual Permit (IP) will be required.
The lead agency for the State EA review and processing is DCM, and USACE will be the lead
federal agency.
The site is comprised of two parcels located on the Pamlico River and US 17, adjacent to the
south side of the US 17 bridge, within the limits of the City of Washington. Lot 1 (PIN # 5675-
67-4388) is 2.41 ac. and Lot 2 (PIN # 5675-67-5100) is 3.48 ac. with a combined total area of
5.89 ac (See Figure 1, USGS Topographic Map of the relevant portion of the Washington 7.5
minute quadrangle. There are 2.76 ac. of wetlands located on the site. The center of the
Property lies at approximately 35.5391803°N and 77.05570870W.
B. PERMITTED WORK.
The site is the location of a former bulk fuel storage facility and has been deemed eligible for
entry into the NC Brownfields program through the NC Division of Waste Management (DWM).
Recent cleanup work involved excavation and removal of areas of contaminated soils
associated with the release of petroleum fuel product from the former bulk fuel facility. The
cleanup/remediation area includes a small area of Section 404 wetlands, and a Nationwide 38
Permit (SAW-2007-0297-107, 3/21/08) has been issued by USACE for wetland impacts in this
location (included as Attachment A). This also required a 401 Water Quality Certification (07-
1960 Ver.2, 4/14/08, included as Attachment B). This work is complete and did not require a
CAMA permit since it did not involve work in any CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern
(AEC's).
The site is also the site of a boat mooring facility that included piers, 10 slips, decking, boat
ramp and shoreline stabilization (CAMA Major 77-95, 6/15/95 and Major Modification, 9/3/97,
included as Attachment C). The permitted and built water dependent structures are depicted
on the CAMA Base Map (Figure 2). The structures are currently in poor condition and in a
dilapidated state.
Other recent permits include a SESCP Permit from NCDLQ (Beauf-2008-023, 4/16/08, included
as Attachment D) and a General Stormwater Permit (SW7080328, 5/19/08, included as
Attachment E). These permits are for upland grading for areas outside CAMA AEC's and
DWQ Buffer Zones.

August 2009
SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
CAMA Major 153-08 was issued on 9/22/08 (See Attachment F) for installation of 384 linear
feet of new bulkhead, generally along the normal water line (NWL). This work is also complete.
C. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
As depicted in Figure 3, Marina Plan, the proposed Project involves creation of an open water
marina and a boat dry stack facility with a boat drop structure. The proposed open water marina
has been designed to eliminate the need for dredging and there is at least three feet of water in
the slips nearest the shore and an average of five to six feet of water at the most waterward
slips. The proposed marina consists of five individual piers running from the shoreline to deep
water. Each of the piers shown on Figure 3, except for Pier 3, terminate at a line established at
one-fourth the water body width line as per 15A NCAC 07H .0208 Use Standards, (b)(6)(iii).
Pier 3 is proposed to be repaired and rebuilt to the extent necessary in the same footprint as an
existing pier that has historically been used for boat slips and was the subject of previous CAMA
permits (See Attachment C). This was discussed at length with DCM and other State and
Federal regulatory/resource agencies, and was deemed acceptable during the March 4, 2009
scoping meeting. As shown on Figure 2, there is a second existing (but dilapidated) pier that
extends beyond the one-fourth water body line. During the March 4, 2009 scoping meeting,
DCM expressed that they would not support rebuilding of a second pier (beyond the one-fourth
water body line) for several reasons, including the width of the piling spacings and the
dilapidated nature of the structure. The matter of pursuing a CAMA variance through the NC
Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) for rebuilding this pier in the same alignment was
discussed at length during the scoping meeting, but that alternative is not environmentally
preferred or proposed at this time (See Alternatives Analysis).
Boat slips will include approximately 133 total slips of varying sizes including: (88) @ 14 ft x 26
ft, (33) @ 16 ft x 36 it, (8) @ 20 x 50 it, (2) @ 24 ft x 60 ft and (2) staging slips at the fueling and
pump -out area. Also proposed are designated canoe/kayak and paddle vessel tie up areas in
the locations shown on Figure 3. This is a slotted/pervious walkway that will provide access to
the marina piers. Boating gear and supplies can be carted to individual slips along this
designated walkway.
A 150 slip dry boat storage facility with a mobile boat lift and drop service is proposed. This
would consist of (2) 75-slip structures with an associated concrete boat drop area as depicted
on Figure 3. Figure 4 is a schematic of the proposed boat drop. There is a proposed boat
washdown area associated with the marina that is proposed to be located inside of the dry
storage structure. The designated washdown area will include catch basin inserts to filter solid
contaminants associated with boat washdown. As elaborated in Section G.14 Environmental
Effects, Introduction of Toxic Substances, the filters will collect substances such as paint chips
or petroleum product residue
A shiptore/clubhouse for marina related retail and food service needs is also proposed as
shown as shown on Figure 3. In addition, there will be designated parking areas that adhere to
the City of Washington requirements.
A sewage pumpout station will be located beside the fuel pumps to serve boats with heads.
The marina facility is to be designed, maintained and managed to be qualified as an NC Clean
Marina.

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
D. PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT.
The purpose of the Project is to create a recreational boat marina. The marina will benefit the
local economy with short term and long term job creation and increases in the tax base of the
City of Washington and Beaufort County by adding value to the development and neighboring
properties.
There is a need for marinas and water access locations, especially for those citizens who do not
own property on deep water. With waterfront properties at a premium, marinas allow non -
waterfront residents to readily access and enjoy our public trust natural resources. Tourism and
outdoor recreation are important and growing economic components to the City of Washington
and Beaufort County, and vital supplements to the manufacturing backbone of the economy.
E. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.
1. Preferred Alternative — Open Water Marina (Project as Proposed).
See Section C, Proposed project Description (above) and Section G, Predicted
Environmental Effects of the Project, for a description. See also Figure 3 and Figure 4.
2. Alternative II: Open Water Marina.
The Alternative II Open Water Marina option that was considered is included as Figure 5.
This alternative was discussed at length during a March 4, 2009 scoping meeting and
involves the construction of four piers, two of which extend beyond the one-fourth water
body width. It was the recommendation of DCM that this alternative not be pursued due to
the judgment by representatives of DCM that Pier 4 from Figure 5 would not be considered
repair. While there are existing pilings and pier stringers in this alignment, it is DCM's
position that the piling width is too great and the structure is in a dilapidated state beyond
repair. Based on DCM's recommendations, the marina plan was amended to the Project as
Proposed.
3. Alternative III: Other Open Water Marina Configurations.
Other marina configurations considered involve the inclusion of additional piers_(compared
to the Preferred Alternative and Alternative II) further to the south. However, recent water
depth surveys in this area indicate very shallow water and a large sand shoal in this area.
Therefore, additional piers for boat moorings in this area would require new dredging. This
is not an environmentally preferred alternative, nor is this preferred.
It should also be noted that North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources (DCR), State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) recommends that an archaeological survey be
conducted to identify submerged remains that exist if piers are proposed that are south of
the existing pilings. The Preferred Alternative and Alternative II would not require an
archaeological assessment since known submerged structures of interest to SHPO would
not be disturbed.
4. Alternative IV: No Action Alternative.
The No Action Alternative (related to a marina and dry stack) would not serve the project
purpose and need. Given the market value of riparian properties such as this, the No Action
option is economically unrealistic unless the Property is acquired and protected by a land
conservation organization or a public entity that creates a park or public boat launch area.
3

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
No action would also mean no increase in the Beaufort County ad valorem tax base that
would otherwise be achieved by the proposed development.
F. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AREA
1. Topography.
Included as Figure 6, is the latest grading plan. In general, the wetland elevation is
approximately 2.5 feet NAVD 88 according existing topographic data. The pre-existing
concrete and the majority of the existing impervious areas on the Property have been
removed during cleanup activities associated with the former petroleum product releases on
the site. Current upland elevations range from 3-10 feet NAVD 88.
Soil remediation efforts associated with the NC Brownfields Program remediation included
0.16 acres of wetlands disturbance that has been permitted under a Nationwide #38 and a
401 Water Quality Certification (See Attachments A and B).
Included on Figure 3 are water depth soundings, measured by Quible on February 12,
2009. Water depths were established using a 10 foot graduated measuring rod (depths
rounded to the nearest 0.25 feet) and located with a hand-held GPS unit. Depths are
relative to normal water level (NWL).
2. Soils.
The main reference for historical mapping data, soil classification and descriptions is the
1995 Soil Survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina, published by the US Department of
Agriculture (USDA) and Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
Figure 7, Soil Map Overlay, is an overlay of the USDA/NRCS Soils Survey. Soil types on
the soil survey include Seabrook loamy sand Dorovan muck. A description of these soil
types are as follows:
a. Seabrook loamy sand (Sb).
This is a nearly level, moderately well drained soil found on smooth ridges of river and
stream terraces. Typically, the surface layer is a grayish brown loamy sand to 8 inches,
underlain by loamy sand with yellow -brown -gray hues. The permeability is generally
very rapid.
b. Dorovan mucky peat (Do).
This is a nearly level, very poorly drained organic soil found in wooded areas and flood
plains along the Pamlico Sound. Typically, the surface layer consists of dark mucky
brown peat underlain by black muck to 63 inches. Permeability is moderate.
As a component of the Brownfields remediation effort, much of the surface soils of uplands
on the west side of the Property have been removed and have been replaced by sand
dominated fill material from an off -site location. In addition, as represented on Figure 6,
recent grading on areas outside the remediation limits required the import of sand
dominated material as well. As a component of a previously proposed residential
condominium development on the Property, Bridge Harbor, LLC contracted the services of
Terracon for the purpose of subsurface geotechnical testing. Included as Attachment G is
Terracon's Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated July 13, 2006. The boring logs near the
end of the report indicate varying grades of sand, silt and clay from the surface, down to 25-
23 feet below surface in the upland areas of the Property.
0

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
3. Land Use.
The Property is composed of two parcels. The 2.41 acre parcel was previously owned by
Tim Forrest and was the site of the existing pier that was retrofit with 10 boat slips as
permitted in CAMA Major 77-95 (See Attachment C). The 3.48 acre parcel was previously
owned by Julian Moore and is the former location of Waters Oil, a commercial bulk fuel
facility. The upland portions of this site had several above ground fuel storage tanks and
concrete pads, a storage building and office, and concrete drives and parking areas. All of
this infrastructure has been removed as part of the remediation efforts associated with the
NC Brownfields Program.
The Property is currently undeveloped.
4. Wetlands.
The Section 404 wetland areas on the property were delineated by Scott Jones, USACE
and surveyed by Jarvis and Associates in 2007. The surveyed wetlands delineation has
been used for the basis of recent CAMA, USACE and DWQ Permitting. The wetland areas
encompass 2.76 acres of the total 5.89 acres.
The cleanup/remediation area included 0.16 acres of Section 404 wetland impacts (See
USACE and DWQ permits included as Attachments A and B). This work is complete and
did not require a CAMA permit.
There are no coastal wetlands. This determination was made by Mike Thomas, DCM on
February 12, 2009 during an on -site meeting with Brian Rubino of Quible.
5. Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands.
There is no Prime or Unique Agricultural Land.
6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas.
The Property does not include any public, State or Federal lands, nor are there any
designated Scenic, Recreational or State Natural Areas on, or adjacent to, the Property.
Public trust waters of the Pamlico River border the Property.
7. Areas of Archaeological or Historic Value.
There are no known archaeological or significant historical sites on the property.
Attachment H includes a letter from SHPO that will be further discussed in Section G.7
Predicted Environmental Effects of this report.
8. Air Quality.
The Property is not located in an area affected or threatened by contamination from
gaseous air pollutants.
9. Noise Levels.
The most appreciable noise is generated by automobiles on the public rights -of -way and
power boats that utilize Pamlico River.
10. Water Resources (Surface Water and Groundwater).
The Property lies on the Pamlico River. Waters of the Pamlico River in this area are
classified as C (Fish Propagation), NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) by NCDENR and are

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
not considered to contain pollutants above NCDENR state standards, as listed in the NCAC
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2B, Section 0.0200. The Pamlico River is also designated
as an Inland Primary Nursery Area (PNA) by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
(WRC).
Included as Attachment I, is a set of maps obtained from the DMF website that includes
surface water designations and fisheries data.
Surface sediments in the vicinity of the Property consist primarily of unconsolidated deposits
of sand, clay, silt and decomposed organic material. Though all of these media have pore
spaces and can hold water, clay and some organic strata only allow fluids to pass at slow
rates, while fluids transmit rapidly through sand. As described in the soils section above,
most surface soil types on the Property are a combination of sand, silt and clay. Below the
top of the groundwater table, sands can yield a usable water supply, while clay layers are
nearly impermeable. Semi -confined aquifers in this region are separated by clay confining
beds. Subsurface geology consists of sedimentary sequences of semi -confined aquifers
and confining beds with an easterly homoclinal dip.
11. Forest Resources.
Forest resources on the Property primarily consist of mixed hardwoods in the wetland areas.
12. Shellfish and/or Finfish and Their Habitat.
The waters of the Pamlico Sound in the vicinity of the Property are inland waters (see
Descriptive Boundaries for Coastal -Joint -Inland Waters included in Attachment 1). As
inland waters, this area is closed to shellfishing, including crab pots.
Attachment J includes letters from Quible to Ron Sechler, NMFS and Sean McKenna,
DMF, dated 5-5-09, notifying NMFS and DMF of the proposed project with requests for
pertinent fisheries sampling data. Included in Attachment K is a list of species from the
DMF independent gill net survey (2003-2007) for the Upper Pamlico River, listed in order of
abundance from catch per unit effort. This area of the Pamlico commonly supports fresh to
brackish species, including anadromous migratory populations and saltwater species on
occasion. Mr. McKenna has indicated that this list of species is representative of the
Pamlico River at Bridge Harbor.
There is no indication that this area of the Pamlico River supports any significant submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV) growth. During data collection visits performed in association with
previous CAMA permits, land disturbance permits and during preparation of this EA, no
rooted SAV was encountered. During the March 4, 2009 scoping meeting, there were no
agency concerns raised regarding SAV in this particular are due to bottom conditions and
turbidity. In the summer of 2009, a request was made to DWQ to perform a SAV evaluation.
On July 22, 2009, Jill Paxson from DWQ performed an evaluation for SAV and no SAV was
observed.
13. Wildlife and Natural Vegetation.
The wetland areas provide habitat to an array of common fauna and tree, shrub and herb
flora. According to natural communities described by Schafale and Weakley, 1990, the
wetland community resembles a Coastal plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest.
The current list of threatened and endangered species for Beaufort County was obtained
from the NC Natural Heritage Program, updated on May 4, 2008. None of the following

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August2009
species have been identified on the property. Below is a tabular summary of State and
Federal threatened and endangered species along with a description of each.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Major Group
State
state
Federal
Federal
Endang-
Threat-
Endang-
Threat-
ered
ened
ered
ened
Acipenser
Shortnose
Vert.- Animal
X
X
brevirostrum
Sturgeon
Alligator
American
Vert.- Animal
X
X
mississippiensis
Alligator
Canis rufus
Red Wolf
Vert.- Animal
X
Corynorhinus
Rafinesque's
Vert.- Animal
X
rafines uii macrotis
Big -eared Bat
Haliaeetus
Bald Eagle
Vert.- Animal
X
leucoce halus
Lepidochelys
Atlantic Ridley
Vert.- Animal
X
X
kem ii
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
Vert.- Animal
X
X
Woodpecker
Rana capito
Carolina Gopher
Vert.- Animal
X
Fro
Trichechus
West Indian
Vert.- Animal
X
X
manatus
Manatee
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic Pi toe
Invert.- Animal
X
Aeschynomene
Sensitive
Vascular Plant
X
X
vir inica
Jointvetch
Lysimachia
Rough -leaf
Vascular Plant
X
X
as erulifolia
Loosestrifa
Platanthera nivea
Snowy Orchid
Vascular Plant
X
a. Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum). This endangered fish has
historically inhabited the lower sections of large rivers and coastal waters along the
Atlantic coast. It is usually less than 3 ft long and has a wide mouth pointed
downward beneath a short snout. It has five rows of sharp, pointed plates along the
sides of its body that provide protection from predators. While there have been
documented specimens caught in other nearby coastal counties in North Carolina, it
is unknown when last observed in Beaufort County.
b. American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). This threatened reptile is listed as
threatened due to the similarity in appearance and habitat preferences to the
American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus). Preferred habitats include rivers, streams,
lakes, ponds, swamps, wetlands, and other low water areas where fish, fowl and
small animals provide an adequate food supply.
c. Red Wolf (Canis rufus). This federally endangered mammal is a medium sized
canid which inhabits any area of sufficient size that provides food, water, and thick
vegetation for cover, including coastal prairie and marsh habitat. While extirpated
from the easten US by the 1920's, there is an experimental population of red wolves
managed from the Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. The Property does not
offer the appropriate habitat since it is not contiguous to a significant area of open
land.

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
d. Rafinesque's Big -eared Bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii macrotis). This mammal is
considered threatened by the State of North Carolina. This is a relatively small (7-13
grams and 45 to 70 mm) bat that roosts in trees and under leaves. This brown
colored bat is distinguished by its large ears. Like most bats, the Rafinesque feeds
after dark on small insects by hovering like a butterfly or hummingbird. They are
known to roost in old buildings, caves and mines and are usually found near water.
e. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). This large raptor is considered threatened
by the State of North Carolina. It is found to nest in mature forests near large bodies
of water, including sounds and rivers. The bald eagle is a powerful, brown bird that
matures with a white head and tail. Females generally weigh up to 14 pounds, and
have a wingspan of 8 feet. Males are smaller, weighing 7-10 pounds, and have a
wingspan of 6.5 feet. No nests have been identified on the property and most trees
on the Property are not of sufficient size to support the bald eagle. Bald eagles are
commonly found along the Pamlico River.
Atlantic Ridley (Lepidochelys kempii)
This endangered reptile is found in open marine environments or on beaches when
laying eggs. Atlantic Ridley or Kemp's Ridley is not listed as having been observed
in Beaufort County within the last 20 years. This is a small to medium-sized sea turtle
with a very broad, heart -shaped shell. Juveniles may be found along the North
Carolina coastal areas, but they are known to nest in the southern Gulf of Mexico
(Texas and Mexico).
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis). This endangered wood boring bird
is small (20-22 cm). There are black and white horizontal stripes on its back, and its
cheeks and underparts are white. Its flanks are black streaked. The cap and stripe
on the side of the neck and the throat are black. The male has a small red spot on
each side of the black cap. After the first post fledgling molt, fledgling males have a
red crown patch. Habitat includes mature open pine forests, mainly in longleaf pines.
h. Carolina Gopher Frog (Rana capito). This amphibian is considered to be
threatened by the State of North Carolina. The Carolina gopher frog resembles a
toad in many aspects, including its warty skin, large head and chunky body. Gopher
frogs depend on fishless ponds for breeding. Virtually all breeding sites are upland
ephemeral ponds in longleaf pine savannas. This species has not been found as far
North as Beaufort County in recent history.
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus). This endangered aquatic mammal,
affectionately known as the sea cow, is found in both salt and fr9sh water bodies in
depths of 1.5 to 6 meters (5 to 20 feet) including canals, rivers, estuaries and bays.
While the area is not considered common habitat for manatees, there have been
documented sightings of manatees in nearby waters.
j. Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). This bivalve is a mussel that inhabits clean,
swift waters with stable gravel, or sand and gravel substrate. This species has either
been extirpated from Beaufort County or it has not been identified in recent history.
k. Sensitive Jointvetch (Aeschynomene virginica). This endangered (state
designation) and threatened (federal designation) is an annual plant that typically

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
attains heights of 1 to 2 meters in a single growing season, although they can grow
as tall as 2.4 meters. The stems are single, sometimes branching near the top, and
with stiff or bristly hairs. The leaves are even -pinnate, 2 to 12 centimeters (cm) long,
with entire, glad -dotted leaflets. The yellow, irregular flowers are 1.0 to 1.5 cm
across, streaked with red. Sensitive joint -vetch grows in the intertidal zone where
plants are flooded twice daily. The species seems to prefer the marsh edge at an
elevation near the upper limit of tidal fluctuation.
Rough -leaf Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia). This endangered perennial plant
has yellow flowers that are 1.5 cm across with yellow -orange anthers. Flowering
occurs from mid -May through June. This species generally occurs in the ecotones or
edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub
and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly drained soil) on moist to seasonally
saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand.
m. Snowy Orchid (Platanthera nivea). This plant is considered to be threatened by the
State of North Carolina. Each plant contains many bright white flowers with slender,
erect stems. Habitats include savannas and bogs. This species has either been
extirpated from Beaufort County or it has not been identified in recent history.
G. PREDICTED ENVIROMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT
1. Topography.
There is no proposed work that will have an effect on topography. The relative topographic
conditions are indicated in Figure 6. The permitted grading as per SESCP Beauf-2008-023,
dated 4/16/08 and modified on 5/7/09 (Attachment D) has been completed by Bridge
Harbor, LLC in the spring of 2009. The Project as Proposed does not include dredging.
2. Soils.
There is no proposed work that will have a negative effect on existing upland soils. See the
permitted and implemented grading plan included as Figure 6. Site work for the proposed
upland infrastructure will take into account geotechinal recommendations that may include
minor fill, compaction, footers, etc.
The driving of pilings into the public trust substrate will create short term local turbidity, but
this is not expected to cause a displacement or change in bottom type.
3. Land Use.
The Project as Proposed will create a marina facility where none currently exists. While
there has been marina dockage and documented boat slips and marine based commerce
on the property in the past (still evident from the existing piers and pilings), no marina
(greater than 10 slips) has been permitted by DCM. In addition to the 133 proposed open
water boat slips, there is a proposed dry boat storage facility with 150 dry storage slips. A
shiptore/clubhouse for marina related retail and food service is also proposed, along with
parking areas that adhere to the City of Washington requirements.
Based on the past contamination issues associated with the former bulk fuel facility on the
Property, and the fact that the sources of contamination have been removed and the site
appropriately remediated, this change of land use is not expected to have a negative impact
on the land.

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August2009
4. Wetlands.
There are no additional wetland fill impacts proposed. Proposed wetland shading is limited
to 1,342 sq.ft. (0.03 ac) and is associated with a pile-suppoted slatted walkway over Section
404 wetlands leading from the proposed ship store to the marina. This is a water -dependent
feature.
5. Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands.
As previously stated, there is no Prime or Unique Agricultural Land.
6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational and State Natural Areas.
As noted above, there are currently no public lands or designated scenic, recreational, or
State natural areas on the property.
The location of the proposed open water marina is in the riparian corridor of public trust
waters of the Pamlico River. The total area of proposed piers, boat drop and slip area in the
public trust is 80,057 sq.ft. (1.84 ac.). A breakdown of the open water use of the proposed
marina is as follows:
STRUCTURE
PIER AREA
(sq.ft.)
BOAT SLIP
AREA (sq.ft.)
TOTAL (sq.ft.)
Pier 1
2,153
18,944
21,103
Pier
1,987
6,172
8,159
Pier 3
3,091
19,332
22,423
Piers 4 & 5
4,454
17,472
21,926
Boat Drop
1,484
4,962
6,446
If required by the North Carolina State Property Office, a submerged lands easement will be
sought for this use if necessary. It has been a common condition in CAMA Major Permits
that coordination with the State Property Office occurs prior to construction of an open water
marina such as this.
7. Areas of Archaeological or Historical Value.
As previously stated there are no known archaeological or significant historical sites on the
property. Included as Attachment H, is a letter from SHPO that was written in response to
two marina alternatives that were initially considered. Due to a reported shipwreck
downriver of the existing piers on the Property, the alternative that included additional piers
downriver or south of the existing piers would require an archaeological survey to identify
the presence and significance of submerged arcgaeological remains. That alternative,
referred to as Alternative B in Attachment H is similar to what is referred to as Alternative III
herein (See Section E.3 above). The project as currently proposed does not propose new
piers in the location of the reported shipwreck, and therefore will not have an effect on
archaeological resources.
8. Air Quality.
There will be no significant impacts to air quality resulting from the Project.
10

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
9. Noise Levels.
August 2009
There will be some temporary increases in noise levels on the property during the
construction phase by heavy machinery including vibratory hammers, bull dozers,
excavators, backhoes, rollers and pavers. Following construction, there will be an increase
in boaters and therefore an increase in associated noise. This increase in noise is not
anticipated to be a significant impact.
Activities associated with launch and retrieval of boats from the dry stack will create
localized noise.
10. Water Resources.
The potential for water quality impacts associated with projects such as this include: a.
Increased Turbidity Impacts During Construction, b. Marina Harmful Substance Releases,
and c. Surface Water Runoff. Each is discussed below:
a. Increased Turbidity
Prior to new pier construction, existing pilings that are in a dilapidated condition will be
removed. This was a topic of discussion during the March 4, 2009 inter -agency scoping
meeting. The existing pilings (except for those along the alilgnment of Pier 3) must be
removed for new pier construction, and, those pilings are currently considered a hazard
to navigation. The locations of the existing pilings are approximately depicted on Figure
2. The pilings that are especially a navigational safety problem are in the former pier
alignment closest to the US 17 bridge (west of Proposed Pier 1). Many of these pilings
extend only about 1 foot above NWL and are at times entirely submerged, and therefore,
not visible to boaters. The pilings will be pulled out of place where possible. Those
pilings that cannot be pulled out of place from machinery on a barge will be saw -cut at
the substrate base. These are the two methods of piling removal that were discussed at
the scoping meeting. On other similar projects in this area, these methods of piling
removal have been acceptable. There will be some short-term local increased turbidity
associated with piling removal. This minor turbidity increase will have only a negligible
impact compared to turbidity increases that would be associated with excavating or
washing pilings out.
The new proposed piers are to be supported by timber pilings that will be driven in place
from a barge with a vibratory hammer. If necessary, pilings will also be washed in place.
As with any new pier construction, this is anticipated to cause minor short-term local
turbidity impacts.
New shoreline stabilization bulkhead has been installed at approximately NWL as
permitted in CAMA Major 153-08 (See Attachment F and Figure 2), therefore, there is
no increased turbidity associated with new bulkhead construction or shoreline erosion
expected or proposed.
b. Marina Operations
It is intended that this project is designed and managed in ways required to meet the
North Carolina Clean Marina Program protocol.
A sewage pumpout station will be located on Pier 2 adjacent to the boat drop, to serve
boats with heads. There will be clearly visible signage that states "Discharge of any
Boat Waste into Public Trust Waters is Prohibited" and "Pumpout Station Available".
11

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC August 2009
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Wastewater will be accepted and treated by the City of Washington municipal
wastewater treatment system.
There will be a designated fish cleaning station located between Piers 2 and 3. A sign
beside the station will state "Dumping of fish waste into marina basin is prohibited".
There will be a covered receptacle located at the fish cleaning station specifically for
disposal of fish waste. Another covered receptacle will be for common trash. When
practical, the fish waste will be used for compost or crab bait.
There will be no on -site fueling or storage of significant amounts of petroleum based
fuels.
c. Surface Water Runoff
A Stormwater Management permit will'be obtained to address runoff associated with the
concrete boat drop. The impervious cover leading to the boat drop has been designed
to be graded in a way that will not direct or funnel stormwater from adjacent impervious
surfaces to the boat drop. All upland development associated with the dry stack, ship
store and parking areas will be addressed in a State Stormwater Management Permit as
well as a Beaufort County Stormwater Management Permit.
The cover or built -upon area within the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Zones will be limited to water
dependent uses including a slatted walkway/pier that connects the marina piers and a
boat drop drive from dry stack to the water. The walkway will be a designated access
route to minimize other potential access routes through the buffer zones. This is
considered pervious and will not be roofed on any areas. The boat drop drive will
include 1,477 sq.ft. of Zone 1 impervious cover and 599 sq.ft. of Zone 2 impervious
cover.
A Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (SESCP) will be prepared to control
sediment movement associated with boat basin and associated infrastructure
construction. All areas affected by land disturbing construction activities will be
protected with a combination of grading, diversions, silt fence, siltation basins and
temporary and permanent vegetative stabilization.
11. Forest Resources.
The project as proposed will have no impact to forest resources.
12. Shellfish and/or Finfish and Their Habitat.
The proposed 133 slip marina will temporarily disturb the benthic substrate within the pier
and slip area, particularly adjacent to piling installations. Other than this disturbance, no
dredging or excavation of sediments or shallow water habitat within the Pamlico River is
proposed. To minimize unavoidable impacts to fisheries habitat, it is recommended that the
installation of pilings be limited to a period starting on October 1 and ending not later than
March 31. This construction moratorium will help minimize impacts to aquatic eggs, larvae,
and juvenile shellfish and finfish species.
The proposed pilings have the potential to provide an artificial habitat for fish, mollusks, and
invertebrates found in the surrounding waters. This issue was an important subject of the
March 4, 2009 inter -agency scoping meeting. It is understood that the removal of the
existing dilapidated pilings will include a removal of existing habitat, but there will be a net
increase in pilings. The number of existing pilings is approximately 330 and the number of
12

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
new pilings associated with the Project as Proposed is approximately 700. These pilings
include pier support pilings spaced on 8 ft centers and mooring pilings associated with the
new slips.
As discussed in Section F.12, Existing Environmental Characteristics of the Project Area,
Shellfish and/or Finfish and Their Habitat, there is no evidence of SAV growth in the
proposed marina area.
Impacts to fish and their habitat associated with the Project will be negligible.
13. Wildlife and Natural Vegetation.
Changes in land use would have only negligible effects to wildlife and natural vegetation
habitat. The upland areas of the property that will be developed have a history of being
used for industrial and marina purposes, arid are certainly far from being in pristine condition
in relation to providing important wildlife and natural vegetation habitat.
The wetland areas provide habitat to an array of common fauna and tree, shrub and herb
flora. There is no intended impact to the wetland areas on the Property.
14. Introduction of Toxic Substances
The boat washdown area associated with the marina is proposed to be located inside of the
dry storage structure. The designated washdown area will include catch basin inserts to
filter solid contaminants associated with boat washdown. The filters are to be located within
a central washdown drain contained within a curbed pavement area under the dry stack
roof. The insert filters will collect materials such as paint chips, oil/grease and nondescript
sediment before the wastewater reaches the City of Washington central sewer system. This
will include an oil -water separator that will collect oil.
There will be a sewage pumpout station as discussed in Section G.10.b above.
H. SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
1. Secondary Impacts.
Secondary impacts are defined in 15A NCAC 1 C.0101(d)(4) as impacts that are "caused by
and result from the proposed activity although they are later in time or further removed in
distance, but they are still reasonably foreseeable."
Anticipated secondary impacts associated with the Project include the following:
a. Increase in vehicular traffic associated with access to the marina.
The proposed development will cause a minor increase in traffic on US 17. The existing
road infrastructure is considered adequate to handle the increased flow, and, it is likely
that the US 17 bypass will be open to traffic prior to the Bridge Harbor marina.
b. Potential increase in retail and commercial services associated with boating
activities.
The marina will have the potential of triggering new retail and commercial services
(including marine mechanical, boating supply, and food service). The land use plans in
the area would allow for these type of services in areas along US 17 in Washington or
13

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
Chocowinity. This is not anticipated to have a significant impact to the area and may in
fact create some local jobs and provide a minor boost to the local economy.
c. Increased Need for Potable Water and Wastewater Treatment.
As described herein, the Project will be served potable water by Beaufort County and
Wastewater treatment will be provided by the City of Washington's sewer service. In
addition to these utility requirements for the Bridge Harbor marina, there is potential for
minor increase in demand for water and wastewater treatment needs on related
businesses outside the Property associate with secondary businesses as described in
item b above.
2. Cumulative Impacts.
Cumulative impacts are defined in 15A NCAC 1C.0101(d)(2) as impacts "resulting from the
incremental impact of the proposed activity when added to other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future activities regardless of what entities undertake such
activities."
While there are several existing marinas located within Beaufort County, the construction of
the marina at Bridge Harbor and the proposed construction of 133 wet slips and 150 dry
stack slots represent a substantial increase in the number of vessels that have access to the
Pamlico River. However, it is the position of local officials and citizens that the waters of
Beaufort County are significantly underutilized at present and that the Project is expected to
enhance access but not significantly degrade, or impinge upon the use by others of, the
most valuable recreational resource of the area. There does not appear to be an
appreciable risk that the additional vessel traffic would meaningfully elevate navigation risks
in the area or adversely affect water quality.
I. MITIGATIVE MEASURES
1. Sewage Pumpout.
A sewage pumpout station will be provided adjacent to the boat drop, to serve boats with
heads. There will be clearly visible signage that states "Discharge of any Boat Waste into
Public Trust Waters is Prohibited" and "Pumpout Station Available".
2. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan. The following is a Spill
Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan to be followed by boat owners and tenants at
the Bridge Harbor Marina in the event that a spill or other release of hazardous materials.
Contact lists will be posted in proximity to the waterfront. The posted list will include:
• Local Fire Department 911
• County or Local Emergency Planning or Haz-Mat Response Team, [phone]
State Division of the Environment and Natural Resources, [phone]
Boat owners will be advised to call one, or all, of these numbers as required, should a
release of hazardous materials occur.
14

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
Also provided on -site will be spill kits that can be used by boat owners, property owners and
tenants within the marina area to provide immediate remediation in case of a spill or release.
The kit will include:
• 1 pack of No. 8Q42933 - 8"x18' long booms ten pack
• 1 pack of No. 8Q-4004 - sorbent pillows ten pack
J. STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS REQUIRED
• Coastal Area Management Act Major Development Permit, North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management
• Stormwater Management Permit, North Carolina Department of the
Environment and Natural Resources, (Washington Regional Office)
■ Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, North Carolina Department of the
Environment and Natural Resources (Washington Regional Office)
• US Army COE, Section 10, Section 404 Permits
• Section 401 Water Quality Certification, DWQ, North Carolina Department of
the Environment and Natural Resources
• Watermain Extension Permit, DEH, Public Water Supply, North Carolina
Department of the Environment and Natural Resources
• Sewer Extension Permit, DWQ, North Carolina Department of the
Environment and Natural Resources
• NCDOT Encroachment Permit (for utility installation and drainage
improvements)
K. REFERENCES
• Aerial photography, 2007, provided by Beaufort County.
• North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, 2008, CAMA Handbook for
Development in Coastal North Carolina,
http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Handbook/handbook htm.
• North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Regulations, North Carolina
Administrative Code, Title 15A, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Chapter 7, Coastal Management.
• North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, Downloadable Maps,
http://www.ncf isheries. net/.
• North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program, http://www.ncfloof maps.com.
• North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Website, Element Occurrence Search Page,
http://149.168.1.196/nhp/county. html\.
• SBTDC-Marine Trades Services for the NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources- Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Program and the NC Division of Coastal
Management, 2003, Best Management Practices Manual for North Carolina Marinas.
15

SEPA EA for Bridge Harbor, LLC
Beaufort County, North Carolina
August 2009
• Schafale and Weakley, 1990, Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, North Carolina Department of the Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program,
Raleigh, 325 pp.
• US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Soil Survey of
Beaufort County, North Carolina, 1995.
• US Fish & Wildlife Service Website, North Carolina's Threatened and Endangered
Species, http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/es.html.
• Washington Quadrangle, USGS Topographic Map, 1951, revised in 1983, 1:24,000.
RLO

eaN Iou w I rdana,nr
- - eemme�. tltsaurw
CYL tau 1Q -�
rase
d:'M1Y.•'.: -
55
1YiP cdYL$
dr ' yr - s2
dfL'S FCV�
F.biv 6(F
�Y
/1]IC1P ftI0NLY
f10. 1/LIItlICMf ILRf `
pN1Y,
IIrr ol,Na eeoac HM1imoL, un fbl��CA9Il10NIe
,uEfwwarte (r�wa°iiao
a. rxrporrc OOIM1ICAT:OXfA000laO1
vALm I
ova : Ieaa vn :and-ane
MA9Yg101, fIF.11iO1T aoum, MD
PA f P" eam-N-naa
aJA : Inm a : aN)b,f1
Niag0.,L N.usmT awlm, as
w vAAdra usL
PA wsA Im n - amIal.m qIL WI m)
PAAm AIFA p - Ia1,Af q1L (nM m)
MIBIm PIL31 AIFA - fa,.n4 qR (nr m)
n mrn ,anA:o usA- Sm m
a ooeino a-sIe LfOnIOB fiA6AR - faAw qn
]. � � PLaPtlE! MO Nf]N1A110N K MF9 QI AapIlO1K PFIYMLIII WAMb
n PL@IXTY b ID M N A FJJIJL a 'AC W) nlLJaa] m O N FW
aaYYUNtt PAan a STaYY]WLI pm "m W/1"
n W]Y m ] W1!M X MTAII°'1E .W OFNILFMN BNMI]aX M!W HAM M PN A 91M1eY PPOILFD N NAaB L Af,aaAT$ ,IL•
In PLaPaaD wlaFAa Lm, W,iT.
11. M& A aF M m N PLYID waa Nf: N] EOR.
A. T,a ANA[ aO11PIFD alkATal lNAa f IT feat N1L m NAOOOI wpfAL AWMNIa
,n anrt.
n A M IeO1] M IX IpOa1N prr. (f0] WfL f fLR. POI WL)
fAR RIVER
r /-
a. ...drfvn.n. 'at:•.•:n:.......................•Jz: wu'eYA.......�........... .A. ntT.'.'l. Y. / . n....... X:.. A.. .n.. ..T......
' •i:•;:ii•:i,. _xy,;. Sews . ).r.... .... -
•' .:--- .,.z .�. s.'; _]-^... •V �:m•:fA:•aI .. •�N/✓XY, +n l;�l..., \\ r � ..✓ r-. ,
err/ �54�,3"/Y`
-� YA
y, vi/ \\ , i /lr Y✓S:'/r/ yr/f / %' ia•/ /./
?„ YCy., ,'y: —'11-- I' S_,e\%'rae.+•1Paei J\ Os
„ .' • �v: y's,":;;Acs.,"!!�� 1 —. - — °, ° ;c c ram° A A--d ,' i *M J7iA'.%"yJ.if'fT• '•\', l', , 1 rC• \" r�S ° O
a ;g iy ,].•. i -17 .g `1', : 1 (/ -v, ,$;�'. ,J laniwrAo 'O O O
I ��`/F'�� �+y�.�!'��,.ny �.3+ +'.�)�� �..f 1 ' h'?Si � � 11 i` , ; ,/ 1 , - : •; � s,�ww.. _ ', {.'� .�/
a (4f d j,tf y ,E"s a7 r \\// :[�M,+.!+ I {�• ,��� I �! PROPOSED
�GBULKHEAD TO BE' $CON TRUCTE$
NAS_FLA V OCMt��R G
"�"'- EDGED--'B_�IC
Al
Ilk
144
l) ,i). M1 .:•'/i r' •A % I aMiA]bS
OT 2
aw m.L I t ,� 1AYf )'7q':7 a {AI { � \- . - (/ } .A' •. ,.
\ I _ty,},d `\ .x.rf'-i]'-ice .'�• �_.: _.
IN I IN
IN,
/ \\ IN, '.
ASI6IEA.IID \\
/i aL :L ► bil. blYP=I.I¢RW�"� ! •ter, ,L � � 3\ /-i ,
OYK AflIOL
1.-1
FT'
oNne oansx
� W afaAlO
Y 11ur�A� 1m Nm
.._1
AIfA N vawxa: A4aL LLIT.
nv® wlow La, YVi.
�..._
oer m Paiu rw
P -
ONM aA'MMIIVn
.�
. __
— — — —
twlw edaarAa unnrr P°e
Sslw was
oNixe aanw DwoO
D BULK
):�_,''�• PAML' ICO RIVER//--
�,,,."�.,..`•. ROP U ''HEAD ;�.�
•�, .;, -CON TRUCTED 2 FT WA RWQRD
r--/ { /._�/�
\
,_.___/`, r•_.
STING BULKHEAD.,
,
>w m, maPr.
311NQ KRTICA RbCK!WALL j0 BE RELOCATED IN
I'
x�l��FaHE iN ULW4EAD
O
jI,
�it ba.i
mmmnmoore
of
�/
�'�/
,". _ /
fv'—/ _
O
�l
mil,}• rT J
" '-4� /
..
�:?:-]--r_l
r_-J A.`/ /..._✓
/....__..✓
err✓
r....�J ri..✓I/..
i._./ r
o-�
PAMLICO RIVER
A�bmr /�_''
r-__✓
r._._✓
r,....,_/ r-__J r'.__✓ /._..✓
r.....✓
/-..,../
r__._�
r__-J
r—/ r--/
r«._/
r_.,__/
r_....J
r_.� r
SaI"-�•1SW f wa aamAml
� •1
1.
iYPIC.L �CPlON sm�n (H_H,
CdY.Iw>InLsRAW '
Q[i6 RAW '
r,
a � fir•
i
f
e i
b
�y
(aIC])
IhN-!b M1
1
IiAD
i
I rsr� 5-20-0
"'- -• f t : � B�e2' aD
Ac �Le�. ; Gs"pd BCALE
wuLl 4m ]�k 4A7mnLlnaa s Iov�i
Aio oas'wn u1A�Li m�
PAL N l A aC�f1NOV
WII� wv WY apnSL. V� t � i al YY] )
l hnl-b R

rT
33
WRECK
34
x-2.25
35
x -2.25
r ,Iw w
V A
LCpg
v1,
I
1� �IIIj1111Q �a�i4 .
` IIIQ :IIIIiII" 0
• • • • • v 1. D j111'�� 'Men,
: w////l//// i M M �I
I) Ilpl , , •, ,x ,
IIIIIIIIIIII11�;4 111Q mllll/"'�/0/Op, w ^ w „ • ♦ • + w
U •1
MIr
�ppppw,
RAIL 73
36
--2.25
37
x -2.25
/
62 63 -4.25 -375
61
-3
-3.zsx
59
x -3.25
58
x -4.25
x -5.75
L END
EXISTING SAND SHOAL
4 i
sEcnoN 404 WETLAND
SLATTED WOOD PIER/DECK/WALKWAY
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA
RIPRWAN SETBACK
BOAT CI IPc, (133)
s 8.25 (2) 24' X 80' (SUPS 41 & 61)
98 8) 20' X 50' (SUPS 6-13)
x -8.75 33)) 18' X 36' (SUPS 1-5. 14-27 k 47-50)
(88) 14' X 26' (SUPS 28-40, 42-46 B 84-131)
(2) STAGING AREA SUPS (SUPS 132-133)
NOTES:
1. AREA OF PROPOSED PIERS AND BOAT DROP OVER
PUBLIC TRUST WATERS:13,175 SQ.FT. (0.30 AC.)
A. PIERS: 11,691 SQ.FT. (0.27 AC.)
B. BOAT DROP: 1.484 SQ.FT. (0.03 AC.)
2. AREA OF PRPOSED WETLANDS SHADING ASSOCIATED WITH
WATER -DEPENDENT WALKWAY: 1.342 SQ.FT. (0.03 AC.)
.25 4-
90
J x -6.25
® 89
x>11.25
ee 'J�A
A1.25 C"
66
-6.00
67
x -6.25
68
x -8.25
69
>11.25
0 00
Z
A
Wao
:�$3
�M N a M N
Z41V �N�14
W
�JU W N i0 G Q �
4 -
CdV I W VM ; Z N
•� U N c c i n lzi
0. a3os E
1")
ar2a'.0
zsz
�ZW
Al zZ
W W
z
0
S
4
II
F
GO Z
0
W
W
a
�
g
U
W
Q
0
0
N
Z
U
IL
Ic
z
cc
e
to
3
09 flMooza
x i utw�nw�0 Fz
gM rZ6wOawoo�
o' m mxao54t op
0 S 0""5o'� 5
O 05,0 y�
O Z
VZOKO �h
F IC O0
IL
57
x -4.25

136
BOAT SLIPS (128)
A: 24' X 60' (4)
B: 20' X 50' (6) py
C: 16' X 36' (30)
D: 14' X 26' (88)
lip lloop
x
.
x -8.75
00000a000
..............
��o��oo�000
,,
�:,:
25
90
--b.25—
WAR,
Win I

wNt ICY 41
.A►��(R�G_R�AII�I�
w._Ilia
1! ro b bPnbe NNEat Na
/bLWCIVI 1IM A�nP�wlal Kw
z PMPom od1PMAtIaPfsEeoom Mrolnm
PA 1 PNP b1A-Q-IJA
ba I Im K . ml-1
NPN61w, MKaPR l
PA 2 PNP bTA-aJ-nm
ba : Iba rn : Call-abN
NPPPMN, bwlartT oaunY, !c
A PAMA AEu
PN AIEA = n -15qR (E41 q)
PMM,L AIEA Laf Q tbMl,rot q(SM m)
CTItlkD PueAi ]bM1b4 q& (aM m)
E lafK aTlu• APFA In m
1 AbAN qR
T. a wAntti PAaPDlFE W Wu W IE'A a5 APMINNK PFIYNel1f AENTACIII
5. PAPNtIY M m M N A F1 }q W (P- Ib) b -wr m WAMO[ AY Ik11A
cnAPlSry Pull I STAbb "a m m W/18/" A1,1q P. bA YYY a �.�TC 0 XMIMM MTAA u � EnWf bTpN� ,1IMW
" o m A PA1eY PPG1•m W A A AMalP m m
ILL Pa.6401No bINIwAI AaPMRS M 11E 005111P PE IALCR
�Wamol Alo N(GVAP011 a EMIIp balllElF NMMaaI PA= AlM
KMDAIbW IPW PASMPIIaY pM110 ON1lVNH u• MRbWS IOGIm 01511E
-ILL /!• NAMtl aP M NW O bOYRIOI AI. 51PAYAlgI
M
m CIE/A5N ND QIPlIb 6 P»m1e VETTAPQI YIMi mSEL5515 OF
bonNIs auMm a T1w PUN PEEr.
-awAL a1c uAIAP MM1 M YYRS a C1eblM/ll¢ bIIEAED a TRb PUN
PEEL P. MIV/K a oomN a1-s1E omm}
• "M1, UYYU .
FRIIIIPm'.gElbb Aw
WNINm A VI.® A! A
AbYOI/WAAY
q.M101A1D lllll.IYlb IOIINIEb
XMl6R MPl1b/
d11ARYt IIYIC/IHIYICM
e<wN Puva Dine ro a
wiN"
- - -
o
Aa1MIEb LAID [•aA1PIN
- -
PANL 6[ Ablm IID PAIL /IYN1
M bPPMIL'IION
-�� -
P11PI11R�INT bRK'
er/m
Yam; ... .......................
,M....._.
H
13ti
,Cq
ZF
4�4
,r
I
LOT Z
pREA'
I
MT
-_• ':�,
'�'z�-"'--
a.NEAb-�
AeIAEs (TBa
---�'.__::.., nnQr
Lr
r
r r r
y
-•`"r
7 �
Ps1m•RIi
I -
/
�/
APa1
LrNmAlo
'.
/
L'tl1:JA0F
aT Ib1a ADPaR m
PTat11/®AMLIPNP
�
• '
SMAc
a[ V M PaAI• IIE
�
`. 5 /
...
r
r
r
= y.},yN¢=rw KV�/�
r --•a r
.. Y'
r .. � ' r���rr •
'
•
I.
bR. a1lIPMMYl161[R� ..
�... � .
� +•C
r r r r r r r r r
. . • . b •try' i---� l-i� ;�/ �\
!—� 1--� �� �f !—✓ T �'/ �—/ PAMIICO RIVER
!�J _4f �� �`r, �,
snlL p a.ZffM=rA=ff C0hMW L PLAN L1Drffi:
1. SbE w M • bFFN11�R *IQ PUN & -
a IAFA ro E oonME9: 41M.165 q.a - .:: m
ALL CIfPSPm APtb PWl a elSm NO MIMED Y. PROAOE A w QFACORR OR pl FVAYim SLaPfS MAIN 21 CNDOVi WYS FmlOw COMlE151N OY
Abmloxo ro M fplal•N srtLProlDaa Nn PNASE a aRIE51R �PIRYn11Nt m�m wN Ny omWm Kw Mmrl la MMap wn oR a wumw
LAYS (11/1MIMR E 9(bN100 fg1DA1Na C01M1EIpN aF C081RVCINN M afVOCPY01f. E BIN ACRAI® OCOM OVI80E TIE
PERMANENT VEGETITION TEYPoRAFY VEGE7ITION PFW WENT �EUEfAIIdI SFalp pTE4 WUp�1L 1- eFP.a)l1El! TOIPoPIAY 4FaElupN aEIDOp 9FclN�gNN9 SIWL BE igIDAID b
P9R PUNfW INIIL 11E NIXT IPPIIOPIdl1E�PPAINIEIO bFIDIIN POmD, AT MSCN POMNi11f VmE1 Z
W1FY NBE 1- MIT a
CAM W. 1 - YNCI M
=_31
EMNNMIm ACOOPDNO Tb POIYVEM VPETATSN M w wgxwlcIB (SEE PCY. A T . 50DN9 ASPw m TI°
�.IP1R
AwltllPlYL/AP[
aim un/ABP
a) V QT%89AS MND 009pf1 OR SIDRMAIFR MAIOFT OIOAON oEYYaPS YARID 1aK a comma m u ICGIICN m
AYIA
a ut
w Atw IR la
PRQEaf 5114 ADgINN11 WT iNILTMb MWL K WA A5 bSECIm W OiCPEFII a A5 W PFOU f OIAIICE Tb AN
''
•u•
PP6w1T. = aT LANCE DOW m T MEET.
®m
b.) SOk maalON ANl Skd1ENfAlNN c0111R015 TD W NSP=M SVMANm NE1 PPP AT IECOYM IINR POaYlEllf
PPVA run
nua
le-twe • Ts WAa
CONIPIX9 APE F81PE1191ED.
PO)4fNN
ImP
Y W
,Ml,
1
PIAN MPMlGL uM OIIEII IPPIIGME PFAMIA
®m
awwo • w WAaP
wwrAwutPPa B•APWMVPSB nx.wiru
�w pB^w�m� � w iar
fU9 IND/M RJIIOH RNS MpM 11MIS
ql� (OYREA ENOfEp1, AI0 AppRapRN1E ag9aYENf bifNAVS) AT lEl4f
�
.milYWilfMtllAi Mr
aiF11010E�
�P�t� � NIIa110N �
W ww � G
a
P
a
aRAx snE AOWRgW ro PUN
FAY1M011 R SmYFNfATgN CgRRDI. PRACRCFS MLL Yi PI�ECIm MIIO.Y AMb NTFR NUW PNXfNl EYURS. N®m
e l+qE�
W
PFPNRS a1 Y: WDE bMmN1FLY.
TAR RIVER Law=
AMIKT
.I .................. ':::::.... y:y_ ... . ,.....::. �.,,r;:..^" 'a-_ 7.F
A...:
XAn;.ti..Y..:v.W.i-v.":::. ..(...:..�:::•_:v. � . r aC01506 wANA1
iiiil:(.' {("^'• '�� PAbTbPm AmSfM M11L
` !�` •-.r---� !--! r--f f aron�rruvi ww a. T.an art. (W AW
�.p`��.`'fA,'r ••'__r. --� "l.":_r _.ru!-a--til- osNb wPc
f� 1 �.5:~�•�t.,s ! !"! � --a--- OaEw Pow POPE VAN
oT bIVbFNI __p__ Door ElGSW VEOY
LL �rw`P'-'J /—I�• I.WJ p [IPIIII00M1MAC IINIIe IIIL
l 384 LH - ..._ _ _ owlw ballblM 0E1u0
I QUbf alllml :i �/tT T--! �! `. �� IIIT® LUINY
>flAIQ( LYIa •' �_J —/ �� — — IYIA OT b•RwNIx
PAMLICO RIVER i
• fir.,.. dA1"'P�' /._r /.�; !-/ r—/ A-/
tt
41,'= "•�`�'`r' o°--lOf o o
O
y
A •
p
O
•
or-01
O0
.i---!
0
\\\ f /_� ! '.!—J:,1 !'�.� /--� i"!
p-'moo _./ ��...'✓
1GnlpgwMs��NT,a ns nAe AOE�
roV WAD W
GRAPHIC SCALE
M �ALL1ME��MMyp MgAy
"C WMYMM 111U1011
s r
P W WMMW pL ►A Pm11aY
■ IEIEEL Mit EWl61M Alp llf Opp
PbTI61 M!w WY SPINEAE YV1 MElmll
(M ma)
1 AW M a
2
1
Ul

FIGURE #7
SOILS MAP OVERLAY
ROJEC7
ROMP V
P07 i 19
COPYRIGHT © 2009
DRAWN
- OUIBLE R ASSOCIATES, P.C.
y. MAP()V x1� LA N,.
i ICE �F. dF
SOILS i6 6 ki
TAS
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF,
GUIBLE & ASSOCIATES, PC. ALL
- kf6
�i. x A, } (fa v : (. J )pr, i J,., e-..'
---
CAD REF.
RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY RE
(PRODUCTION OF THIS OR POSSESSION
WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF
II^-rIGUkC6
ONSTIT T ASSOCIATES, PC WILL
CONSTITUTE VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT
LAWS. VIOLATION WILL BE SUBJECT
GFtlf
TO LEGAL ACTION
b/29/09
.., ... ...
Quible SINCE 1959
& Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING * CONSULTING * PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * SURVEYING
NC Licensed: C-0208
PO Drawer 870, Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E—Ma I: administrotorOauible.Gom

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 2007-02972-107 County: Beaufort USGS Quad: Washington
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Bridge Harbor, LLC
Address: ATTN: Mr. Zane Buckman
416 Riverside Drive
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone No.: (2521945-3315
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The proi Bet area consists of a 5 89-acre
tract located nn thn nnet cMd of rT Q M—L...... . n wr_ _.._ _ ... .. ..
Description of projects area and activity: Applicant proposes to excavate fill and grade 0 16 acres of Department of
the Armv iurisdictional wpAnnde no Wort of
a sand -dominated material.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number: _
Nationwide Permit Number: 38
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Mr. Sco es at [phone], extension 27,
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 03/21/2008
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/21/2010
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://regulatory usacesurvev com to complete the survey
online.
Page 1 of 2

Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued _ Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Car s Wetland
Delineation Manual and is part of a broad continuum of wetlands connected to the Pamlico River.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Scott Jones, Project Manager,
Washingon Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of. the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Mav 21.2008.
**It is not necessary to submitrarrll'A form to the(District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 03/21/2008
Expiration Date 03/21/2013
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Mr. Brian Rubino
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Post Office Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina 27949
Page 2 of 2

Michael F. Easley, Governor
i
� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Chuck Wakild, P.E., Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 14, 2008
DWQ Project # 07-1960 Ver. 2
Beaufort County
Mr. Zane Buckman
Bridge Harbor, LLC
416 Riverside Drive
Washington, NC 27889
Subject Property: 5.89 Acre Lot on South Side of US 17 Bridge over Pamlico River
Pamlico River, Tar Pamlico River Basin
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Buckman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.16 acres of wetlands for the purpose of removal of
petroleum contaminated soil at the subject property, as described within your application dated
March 3, 2008 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ), on March 5, 2008.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3696 (GC3696). The Certification(s) allows you to use
Nationwide Permit(s) 38 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non -discharge; and Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Regulations. Also, this
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
L Impacts Approved
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: h2o.enr.stale.nc.us
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone] One Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone] - Nort7,,'-Caro7lna
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acton Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Naturally

Mr. Zane Buckman
Page 2 of 4
April 14, 2008
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units)
Plan Location or Reference
Stream
(feet)
404/CAMA Wetlands
acres
Waters
0.16 (acres)
Excavation Area
Buffers
(square ft.)
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and. sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the
Mining Act of 1971.
e. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas
(PNAs), Trout (Tr), SA, WS-I, WS-II, High Quality (HQW), or Outstanding
Resource (ORW) waters, then the sediment and erosion control requirements
contained within Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 04B .0124)
supercede all other sediment and erosion control requirements.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification and
authorized by this written approval, including incidental impacts, All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control
Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters

Mr. Zane Buckman
Page 3 of 4
April 14, 2008
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior
approval by DWQ. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and
waters is unavoidable, then design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall
not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. All devices shall be
removed and the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of
Land Resources has released the project.
5. If concrete is used during the construction, then a dry work area should be maintained to
prevent direct contact prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water.
Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be discharged to surface
waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life/fish kills.
6. Work in the Dry
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved
best management practices from the most current version of the NC Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual, or the NC DOT Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as
sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, and other diversion structures shall be used to minimize
excavation in flowing water.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return
the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-
1650.
The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of
State and Federal Law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being met,
including failure to sustain a designated or achieved use, or that State or Federal law is being
violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, then the Division may
reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of ther 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative

Mr. Zane Buckman
Page 4 of 4
April 14, 2008
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act 15A NCAC 02H..0500. If you have any questions, please telephone Roberto Scheller
of the Washington Regional Office at 252-948-3940 or Ian McMillan of the 401
Oversight/Express Unit at 919-715-4631.
Enclosures: Certificate of Completion
GC 3696
cc: Brian Rubino, Quible & Associates, P.C.
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Unit
DLR, Washington
File copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
Al Hodge/Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Washington Regional Office
Filename: 07-1960 Ver.2

Perm& Class
_NIEW
"�roxo
Permit Numbe
Issued to
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 77-95
Department of Environment, Health& Natural Resources
and
v
% Major Developmi
Pursuant to NCr!
— Excavation and/or
r,.
m,
'for )
Area of Environmental Concern
18-
ursuant to NCGS 113-229
- "--""' " "• Lax wa�3, Ureenville, NC 27858
authorizing development in Beaufort
Pamlico River County at south side of US 17 bride on
as requested in the permittee's application dated 3/28/95 & workplan
This permit, issued on JUKE 15 1995
with the permit), all applicable re is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
gulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and voi(t.
Pier/Dock
1) The width of the pier extension across wooded wetlands shall not exceed 6 feet.
2) No more than 10 boats may utilize the docking facilities at any one time.
Bulkhead
3) The bulkhead will be aligned not to exceed 2' waterward of the normal water level at the time
Of construction.
4) The bulkhead alignment is to be approved by a DCM representative prior to construction.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
Other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
g This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
Personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval,
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 1998
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
- RogerN. Schecter, —Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Perminee

Timothy Forrest Permit #77-95
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
5) The bulkhead must be constructed prior to any backfilling activities.
6) The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal sheet piles
or other suitable materials approved by department personnel. No excavation is permitted,
except for that which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap, deadmen
cables, etc. This permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the approved
alignment.
7) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
8) All backfill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined behind the
permitted bulkhead.
Sewage Waste Disuosal
9) Prior to occupancy of any new slips authorized under this permit, a marine pumpout disposal
facility, will be installed and operable (and maintained for the life of the marina).
10) The docking facility will display a sign showing the location of the onsite pumpout facility,
including other appropriate waste disposal information, at the entrance and exit from the main
pier.
11) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from boats using the
docking facility. Any sewage discharge at the docking facility shall be considered a violation
of this permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be applied and
enforced throughout the entire existence of the permitted structure.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
12) All disturbed areas will be properly graded.
13) A permanent ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion will be provided on all exposed areas
within the shorter of 30 working or 120 calendar days after project completion.
14) Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control devices, measures, or structures will be used to
prevent sediment from entering the adjacent wetlands/watercourses/property (e.g., silt fence,
diversion swales/berms, sand fence, etc.).

Timothy Forrest
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit #77-95
Page 3 of 3
15) The applicant must contact the Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section, at (919) 946-
6481 to determine if an erosion control plan will be required for the proposed project.
General
16) This permit authorizes only the docks, piers, and other structures and uses located in or over
the water that are expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other
structures, whether floating or stationary, may become a permanent part of this docking facility
without permit modification. No non -water dependent uses of structures may be conducted on,
in, or over public trust waters without permit modification.
17) Only those "hazards to navigation" that have a direct adverse impact on marina operations may
be removed. The selection of these hazards must be approved by a Division of Coastal
Management representative prior to removal.
18) No marsh grass will be excavated and/or filled.
19) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in any marsh or surrounding waters
outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the workplans.
20) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all
navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must not
interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
21) The permittee will maintain the authorized wrok in good condition and in conformance with the
terms and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he
abandons the project without having the permit transferred to a third party. -
22) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
NOTE: The permittee, and/or his contractor, is urged to meet with a representative of the
Division of Coastal Management prior to project initiation.
NOTE: The N. C. Division of Environmental Management has authorized the proposed project
under General 401 Water Quality Certification #2996 (Project #95433) issued on May
22, 1995,
NOTE: The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action ID
No. 199502569.

Lupasta manak6�1*-

kN—�,�,� ...Permanent ae#lectors ,should be aftached fo zhe structcues in order to makg �t ire uxsible

I � m
so.. (crap. P <rs
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
. Washington Regional Office
Michael R Easley, Governor William G, Ross, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
April 16, 2008
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS
Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
416 Riverside Drive
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RE: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No. Beauf-2008-023
Bridge Harbor Site Remediation
US 17- Beaufort County
River Basin: Tar -Pamlico
Date Received: March 27, 2008
Responsible Parry: Bridge Harbor, LLC
Dear Sir:
This office has completed its review of the erosion and sedimentation control plan for the
referenced 2.56-acre disturbance. Based on the information provided, we have determined the
submitted plan for the site remediation, including demolition, soil replacement, grading and
clearing & grubbing, dated March 24, 2008, if properly implemented and responsibly
maintained, should meet the intent and minimum requirements of the Act. We, therefore, issue
this LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS•
I' No grading activity is approved north of the existing concrete slab on
Lot 1.
2. A minimum of 15 days prior to the start of any additional site
remediation associated land disturbance a revised plan must be
submitted to this office for approval.
3. The plan shows work within the existing wetlands, prior to
construction you must provide this office with a copy of the permit
allowing this work from the appropriate state or federal agency.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone], FAX [phone]
An €quaff Opportunity Employer 50%recycladt10%post•consumsr paper

Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
April 16, 2008
Page 2
4. Prior to the start of construction, if additional fill material is required.
Notify this office of the source of this material.
5. All debris removed from the site must be disposed at a permitted
facility. All contaminated soil removed from the site must be disposed
at G&S Land Company, as per the letter of May 2, 2007 from
Groundwater Management Associates.
6. Proper installation of the silt fence may not be achieved when
installation occurs on existing rip -rap slope stabilization. Be reminded
that all sediment and erosion control measures must be properly
installed as per the approved details.
7. This approval is limited to site remediation activities as proposed in
the approved plan only. Any additional proposed development will
require a new plan be submitted to this office for approval.
In 1973, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (copy available upon request) was
enacted. It established a performance oriented program with the OBJECTIVE of PREVENTING
SEDIMENT DAMAGE to adjoining properties and/or natural resources resulting from land
disturbing activities through the use of reasonable and appropriate Best Land Management
Practices, based on the approved plan and changing site conditions, during the course of the
project. AS THE DECLARED RESPONSIBLE PARTY, YOUR LEGAL
RESPONSIBILITY is to understand the Act and comply with the following minimum
requirements of the Act and the above listed modifications (if any):
- an erosion and sedimentation control plan is only valid for 3 years
following the date of initial approval, if no land -disturbing activity has
been undertaken;
the LATEST APPROVED soil erosion and sediment control plan will be
used during inspection to determine compliance and a copy of the plan
must be on file at the job site;
- erosion and sediment control measures or• devices are to be installed to
safely withstand the runoff resulting from a 10 year storm event - 6.5 - 7
inches in 24 hours or at the rate of 6.5 - 7 inches in I hour.
unless the off -site borrow and/or disposal sites are identified in the
erosion control plan, no earthen material is to be brought on or removed
,from the project site;

Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
April 16, 2008
Page 3
except in the case of a storm related emergency, a revised erosion and
sedimentation control plan must be submitted to and approved by this
office prior to initiating any significant changes in the construction,
grading or drainage plans;
buffer zone, sufficient to restrain visible sedimentation within the 25% of
the width closest to the land disturbance, must be provided and
maintained between the land -disturbing activity and any adjacent property
or watercourse;
new or affected cut or filled slopes must be at an angle that can be
retained by vegetative cover, AND must be provided with a wound cover
sufficient to restrain erosion within 21 calendar days of completion of
anv phase (rough or mall of grading (RYE GRASS IS NOT in the
APPROVED seeding specifications NOR is it an ACCEPTABLE
substitute for the providing of a temporary ground cover);
the CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL must be posted at the
primary entrance to the job site and remain until the site is permanently
stabilized;
unless a temporary, manufactured, lining material has been specified, a
clean straw mulch must be applied, at the minimum rate of 2 tons/acre, to
all seeded areas. The mulch must cover at least 75% of the seeded area
after it is either tacked, with an acceptable tacking material, or crimped in
place;
in order to comply with the intent of the Act, the scheduling of the land -
disturbing activities is to be such that both the area of exposure and the
time between the land disturbance and the providing of a ground cover is
minimized;
- a permanent mound cover. sufficient restrain erosion, must be provided
within the shorter of 15 working or 90 calendar days after completion of
construction or development on any portion of the tract (RYE GRASS IS
NOT in the APPROVED seeding specifications NOR is it an
ACCEPTABLE substitute for the providing of a nurse cover for the
permanent grass cover); and,

Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
April 16, 2008
Page 4
this approval is based, in part, on the accuracy of the information
provided in the Financial Responsibility/Ownership form submitted with
the project plans. You are required to file an amended form if there is any
change in the information included on the form. This approval and the
financial responsibility/liability cited in it does not automatically transfer
with a change in project ownership.
Be advised that to ensure compliance with the approved plan and the program
requirements, unannounced periodic inspections will be made. If it is determined that the
implemented plan is inadequate, this office may require the installation of additional measures
and/or that the plan be revised to comply with state law. (Note: Revisions to the scope of this
project without prior approval of the plan showing the changes can be considered a violation).
Failure to comply with any part of the approved plan or with any requirements of this program
could result in the taking of appropriate legal action (civil or criminal) against the financially
responsible party (Bridge Harbor, LLC). Some options are Stop Work Orders and the assessing
of a civil penalty of up to $5000 for the initial violation plus up to $5000 per day for each day the
site is out of compliance.
In recognizing the desirability of early coordination of sedimentation control, we believe
it would be beneficial for you and your contractor to arrange a preconstruction conference to
discuss the requirements of the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan. Prior to
beginning this project, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO either CONTACT THIS OFFICE TO
ADVISE ME (252-946-6481, ext. 3973) OF THE CONSTRUCTION START-UP DATE,
contractor and on -site contact person OR complete and return the attached Project Information
Sheet to me.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal
and State water quality laws, regulations and rules. In addition, the land disturbing activity
described in this plan may also require approval or permitting from other agencies - Federal,
State or local. These could include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Article
4.0.4.jurisdiction, the Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Section under storrnwater
regulations (contact the Stormwater group at 252-946-6481), county, city or town agencies under
other local ordinances, or other approvals that may be required. This approval does not
suaersede anv other auaroval or permit.
Please be advised that a rule to protect and maintain existing buffers along watercourses
in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin became effective on January 1, 2000. The Tar -Pamlico River
Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0259) applies to a 50
(horizontal) foot wide zone along all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds and
estuaries in the Tar -Pamlico River basin with forest vegetation on the adjacent land or "riparian
area". In riparian areas, the rule prohibits all land disturbance, new development and fertilizer

Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
April 16, 2008
Page 5
use in the first 30 (horizontal) feet directly adjacent to the stream and/or coastal wetland
vegetation. With the exception of clearing, seeding and a one-time fertilizer use to establish the
grass, the rule prohibits new development in the zone 20 feet landward of the first 30 feet of
riparian area. For more information about the riparian area rule, please contact the Division of
Water Quality's Wetland/401 Unit at 919-733-1786.
Please be advised that all land -disturbing activities affecting 1 or more acres are required
to have a (Federal) NPDES permit. Enclosed is the Construction Activities General NPDES
Permit - NCG010000 for this project. The responsibility for understanding and complying with
this permit rests with you, the financially responsible party. Be aware that failure to comply with
this permit could result in both the State and Federal governments taking appropriate legal
action. Contact the Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Section at [phone] should
you have any questions regarding monitoring and record keeping requirements of the permit.
Sincerely,
sus
Robert Be vrn.,--
Assistant Regional Engineer
enclosure
w/o enc. cc: ,Derek A. Dail, PE, Quible & Associates
Terry Moore, Division of Coastal Management
Tracey Wheeler, US Army Corps of Engineers
Alton Hodge, Division of Water Quality

Vo/Vr/[VVU 14.0V rAA Z0Zd03rlU NUUEYIENVINUNMENINAIHILS IQ 002/005
NCDE�IR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D, Simons, PG, PE Beverly Eaves Pardue, Governor
Director and State Geologist Dee Freeman, Secretary
May 7, 2009
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODwrCATTONS
Bridge Harbor, LLC
ATTN: Mr. Harvey R Lewis, Member
Post Office Box 565
Greenville, North Carolina 27835
RE: Brosion and Sedimentadon Control Plan No, BEAUF-20OM35
Project Name: Bridge Harbor
Location: US 17 South - Washington County: Beaufort
River Basin: Tar -Pamlico
Date Received by LQS: April 23, 2009
Acres Approved: 3.3 Project Type: Revised
Project Description: Filling and grading of the site as shown on the drawings prepared by
Quible and Associates, last revised 4/21/2009.
Dear Sir:
This office has reviewed the subject revised erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the plan
to be acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval with Modifications. The modifications
required for approval are listed on the attached page. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years
following the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken, as required by 15A
NCAC 4B.0129.
Please be advised that 15A NCAC 48.0112) requires that a copy Of the approved erosion and
sedimentation control plan be on file at the jo site. Also, you should consider this letter as giving
the Notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to ensure compliance
with the approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is performance oriented, requiring
Protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. g following the commencement
oftbis project, it is determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet
the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (G,S. 113A-51 through 661
this office may require revisions to the plan and implemeo ation of the revisions to ensure compliance
with the Act
Washington Regional office
943 Washington square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 • Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
lntemat; http;//Www.dlr.enr.state.nc.us/pagesAandqualitysecfion.htmi
An Equal Oppptunity I Affirmative Acllen Employer - m4R"ewio,/, Pool Consumer Paper

v0/vt/cvvu 14.3v rnA GOCtltBSf Ib NUUtr JLNV1NUNMtNINAINtS W 003/005
Bridge Harbor, LLC
ATTN: Mr, Harvey R. Lewis, Member
May 7, 2009
Page 2
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and State
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the NPDES General Stormwater Permit
NCGO10000 (Construction Activities) enclosed with the original approval, You should first become
familiar with all ofthe requirements for compliance with the enclosed permit.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the ccyy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form, which you hav�emsnnbmitted, You are required to file an
amended form if there is any change in the irdbrmation included on the Ibrm, In addition, I5A NCAC
4B.0127(c) requires that you notify this office ofthe proposed starting date for this project (using the
enclosed Project Information Sheet). Please conference. notify us if you plan to have a precoostnudon
Please be advised that a rule to protect and Maintain existing buffers along watercourses i4 the Tar -
Pamlico River Basin became effective on January 1, 2000. The Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area
Protection and Maintenance Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0259) applies to It 50 (horizontal) foot wide zone
along all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds and estuaries in the Tar -Pamlico River
Basis For more information about the riparian area rule, please contact the Division of Water
Quality's Watland/401 Unit at 919-733.1786, or DWQ in our regional office at 252.946-6481.
Sincerer
Patrick H. McClain, PE
Regional Engineer
cc w/o enc: loo Lassiter, Quible and Associates, via fir 252-261-1260)
Alton Hodge, Division of Water quality

VJ/VI/LVVO IY,JI rnn GOGS,uo,lo NUUtritMVIhUNutninaiats IQ UU4/UUy
May 7, 2009
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Flan No,: BEAUP-2008-023
Project Name: BRIDGE HARBOR
MODIFICATIONS
Page 1
1. The LATEST APMVED erosion and sediment control plan will be used during periodic
unannounced inspections to determine compliance and a copy of the plan must be on file at
the job site. If h is determined that the implemented plan is inadequate, this office may require
the installation of additional measures and/or that the plan be revised to comply with state
law.
2. All revisions required by other local, state or federal agencies which affect site layout,
drainage patterns, limits of disturbance and/or disturbed acreage must be submitted to this
office for approval a minimum of 15 day prior to the start of construction
3. Revisions exceeding the approved scope of this project without prior approval of the plan
showing the changes can be considered a violation. Failure to comply with any part of the
approved plan or with any requirements of this program could result in appropriate legal
action (evil or crhminei) against the finandally responsible party. Legal actions include Stop
Work Orders and the assmaing of a civil penalty of up to $5000 fbr the initial violation plus
an additional penalty of up to $5000 per day for each day the site is out of compliance,
4. The CERTMCATE OF PLAN AppROV, t must be pasted at the primary entrance to
the job site and remain until the site is permanently stabilized
5. Except in the cage of a storm related emergency, a revised erosion and sedimentation
control plan must be submitted to and approved by this office prior to initiating any
significant changes in the construction, grading or drainage plans.
6, Erosion and sediment control measures or devices are to be installed to safely withstand the
runoff resulting 8nm a 10 year storm event - 6.5 - 7 inches in 24 hours or at the rate of 6.5 -
7 inches in 1 hour.
7- Unless the off -site borrow and/or disposal sites are identified in the erosion control plan, -no
earthen material is to be brought on or removed from the project site.
8. Bu%r zone, suffident to restrain visible Sedimentation within the 25% of the width closest
to the land disturbance, must be provided and msi ntained between the land -disturbing activity
and any adjacent property or watercourse.
9. in order to comply with the intent of the Act, the scheduling of the land -disturbing activities
is to be such that both the area of exposure and the time between the land disturbance and the
providing of a ground cover is minimized,

05/07/2008 14:51 FAX [phone] NCOEPTENVIRONMENTNATRES a 005/005
May 7, 2009
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No.: BEAUF-2008-023
Project Name: BRIDGE HARBOR
Modifications
Page 2
10. Unless a temporary, manufactured, lining material has beast specified, a clean straw mulch
must be applied, at the minimum rate of 2 tons/acre, to all seeded areas. The mulch trust
cover at least 75% of the seeded area alter it is either tacked, with an acceptable tacking
material, or crimped in place.
11. New or affected cut or filled slopes must be at an angle that can be retained by vegetative
cover, AND must be provided with a gmnnd cover aufficient to restrain erosion within
is xoT in the APMOV D seeding spea8cations WE is it an ACCEPTABLE substitute
for the providing of a temporary ground cover).
12. AV=snent=nqd suftent restrain erosioq must be provided within the shorter
of 15 working or 90 calendar days (if in a TEE Quality Zone, the shorter of I5 working or
60 calendar days) after completion of construction or development on any portion of the tract
(MM MUSS.M NOT in the APPROVEb seeding specifications Nit$ is it an
ACCEETABI substitute for the providing of a muse cover for the permanent grass cover).
13. This office has been informed that Mr. Zane Buckman (signer of the original Financial
Responsibility/Ownersbip form) of is no longer an active member of this LLC. Therefore,
the enclosed blank Financal Responsibility/Ownership form must be properly completed and
signed by an active member.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
i
yWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1
Bridge Harbor, LLC
Attn: Mr. Zane Buckman
416 Riverside Dr.
Washington, NC 27889
Dear Mr Buckman:
In accordance
General Perm
2008, we are f
grade a propo
permit is issue
143-215.1 and
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
May 19, 2008
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW7080328
Bridge Harbor Site
General Permit -Clear and Grade
Beaufort County
be covered under the State Stormwater
igg a Proposed Site, received on March 26,
>ubject Certificate of Coverage to clear and
sere the final design is not yet known. This
sments of North Carolina General Statute
00, the stormwater management rules.
Please take notice that this Certificate of Coverage is not transferable except
after notice to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ. The DWQ may require
modification or revocation and reissuance off the Certificate of Coverage.
This ppermit does not affect the leggal requirement to obtain other permits which
may be required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal, State, or Local
agency, law, rule, or ordinance.
A copy of the General Permit is enclosed for your review. If you have any
questions concerning this ermit, or need additional information, please contact
either me or Bill Moore at [phone].
Sincerely,
AI HodgiategarProtection
ional Supervisor
Surface Section
Washington Regional Office
cc: s- tQuible & Associates
Beaufort County Planning/Inspections
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet h2o.enrstate.nc.us
943 Washington Square Mall Phone; 252.946-6481
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Afrirrnalive Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
One
NofthCarolina
Naturally

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GENERAL PERMIT NO SWG030000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. SW7080328
CLEAR AND GRADE A PROPOSED SITE
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
as amended, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by
the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and 15A NCAC
21-1.1000, the Stormwater rules,
Bridge Harbor, LLC
is hereby authorized to clear and grade a proposed development site located at
US Highway 17 South
Washington, NC.
Beaufort County
to receiving waters designated as Pamlico River, class SC -NSW waters in the
Tar Pamlico River Basin, in accordance with the provisions of the General Permit
for Clearing and Grading, No.SWG030000, and the approved stormwater
management plans and specifications and other supportin data as attached
and on file with and approved by the division of Water Quality and considered a
part of this permit for the subject project.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective May 19, 2008.
Signed this the 19 th day of May, 2008.
11 iwQ � �yc tv�ti
For Coleen . Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

State Stormwater Management Systems
PemutNo. SWG030000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT
TO CLEAR AND GRADE A PROPOSED SITE
UNDER 15A NCAC 211.1000
In compliance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations promulgated and
adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
All owners or developers of projects where either a CAMA Major Permit or a Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan approval is required, and the proposed final development plan is not
known, are hereby authorized to clear and grade a proposed development site in compliance with
the General Permit conditions and the provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to
as the "stormwater rules'), the approved stormwater management plans and specifications, and
other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Water Quality
and considered a part of this general permit.
The General Permit shall become effective on September 1, 2003.
Signed this 13tt' day of August. 2003.
Original signed by Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Alan W. Mmiek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SWO030000
SECTION B: SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The permittee shall at all times provide adequate stabilization measures in conformance
with the approved Site & Grading Plan and Erosion Control Plan.
2. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his representative
within the time frame specified in the written information request.
3. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for revised
plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, including, but not limited to,
the following items:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change:
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign of, addition to or deletion of the approved amount of built -upon area,
regardless of size.
C. Further subdivision of the project area.
f. Alteration of the proposed drainage.
4. The Director may determine that revisions to the project will require a modification to
permit coverage.
5. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more
of the minimum requirements of the General Permit. Within the time frame specified in
the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for
modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of
revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
6. Any ponds built or expanded on this project after land disturbance has begun, that might
be used as a stormwater treatment device in the future, must be constructed with a
forebay and a 10' wide 6:1 sloped vegetated shelf, per the requirements of the stormwater
rules.
The site may not be subdivided, sold, or developed with impervious surfaces until a
modification to this permit is submitted and approved.

State Stonnwater Management Systems
SECTION C: GENERAL CONDITIONS Permit No. SWG030000
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in the General Permit is
considered a violation of NCAC 2H.1000, and is grounds for enforcement action in
accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C, or for
certificate of coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification in
accordance with NCGS 143-215.1.
2. The certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to and approval by the
Director. In the event of an ownership change, the Director may require a separate NOI
and certificate of coverage. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits,
and may or may not be approved. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all
permit conditions until such time as the Director approves the transfer.
3. The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the general permit, revoking and reissuing the general permit, or terminating
the general permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in NCGS 143-
215.1 and 15A NCAC 2H.1000.
4. The certificate of coverage is issued in accordance with this general permit and may be
modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The notification of planned
modifications or non-compliance does not stay any general permit condition.
5. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the
permittee shall allow the Director, an authorized representative of the Director, or DENR
staff, to enter the property, inspect the project for compliance with the permit, and sample
or monitor for water quality.
6. The permittee shall notify the Division of any name, ownership or mailing address
changes within 30 days.
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification
regarding the project shall be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
8. The General Permit, Notice of Intent, Certificate of Coverage, approved plans and
supporting documentation are considered public record and are open for inspection.

Permit Class Permit Number
NEW (Express Permit Program) 153-08
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vermin
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Bridge Harbor, LLC, c/o Parker Overton,1698 East Arlington Blvd., Greenville, NC 27858
Authorizing development in Beaufort County adjacent US 17 on the Pamlico River in the
City of Washington, as requested in the permittee's application dated 8/19/08, including the attached workman
drawing (1 total), dated 9/16/08 (Revised) and 9/16/08 modification letter
This permit, issued on September 22, 2008, is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the
permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Shoreline Stabilization
1) In accordance with commitments made by the permittee, and in order to satisfy concerns of the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission and the NC Division of Marine Fisheries, the riprap originally
proposed to be removed now shall be relocated to immediately waterward of the authorized bulkhead.
Any and all reference in the attached application forms or permit drawings to the removal of this riprap
is now considered void.
2) The bulkhead alignment shall approximate the normal water level at the time of construction, with the
exception of the corners of the existing bulkhead which shall not extend waterward more than 13 feet
from the normal water level.
(See Attached Sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2011
In issuing this permit, the State
your project is consistent with
Management Program.
of North Carolina agrees that
the North Carolina Coastal
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
�� V1. mC�U4. ��tess Pen:, CA�o-S7ac�si���
James H. Gregson, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Bridge Harbor, LLC
c/o Parker Overton
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit 4 153-08
Page 2 of 3
3) The alignment of the authorized bulkhead/riprap shall be staked by the applicant and approved by a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of
construction. Failure to initiate construction within 30 days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse
weather conditions, shall require the alignment to be restaked by DCM within a maximum of 30 days
prior to the new expected start of construction.
4) The bulkhead shall be constructed prior to any backfrlling activities, and the bulkhead shall be
structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through the structure.
5) The bulkhead shall be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, vinyl or metal sheet piles or
other suitable materials approved by Division personnel. No excavation is permitted except for that
which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap, deadmen cables, etc. This
permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the approved alignment.
6) The backfill material shall be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
7) In order to protect water quality, runoff from the construction shall not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
8) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures (e.g. silt fence, diversion
swales or berms, etc.) shall be implemented to ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent
wetlands, watercourses and/or properties. At a minimum, a silt fence shall be properly installed
immediately landward of the bulkhead cap, immediately following completion of backfill activities.
Stormwater Management
9) The Division of Water Quality approval of this project under stormwater management rules of the
Environmental Management Commission is covered by way of Stormwater Permit No. SW7080328,
which was issued on 05/19/2008. Any violation of the permit approved by the DWQ shall be considered
a violation of this CAMA permit.
General
10) No fill material shall be placed at any time in any waters outside of the alignment of the fill areas
indicated on the attached workplan drawing(s).
11) This permit does not authorize the excavation or filling of any vegetated wetlands, even temporarily.

Bridge Harbor, LLC Permit # 153-08
c/o Parker Overton Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
12) This permit shall not be not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party
without the written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division of Coastal Management at [phone] prior to the
commencement of any such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that,
in accordance with the rules of the Environmental Management Commission, many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 50 feet of the normal water level or landward edge
of any coastal wetlands, which ever is more restrictive. Contact the Division of Water Quality at
[phone] for project specific clarification.
NOTE: Contractors should be aware of utilities' locations during ingress and egress from the project area
to avoid damage with heavy equipment and materials delivery. Please contact the City of
Washington Public Water Department to confirm location of utilities in the area.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Quality has determined the project is in compliance with North
Carolina's Water Quality Certification Program and has issued General 401 WQ Certification
#3641 on 9/1/2008 and it was assigned project #07-1960 Ver.3.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project ORM ID No. SAW-2007-
02972 and authorized the development via General Permit GP 198000291.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
BRIDGE HARBOR PROJECT
HIGHWAY 17 SOUTH
WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
TERRACON PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
July 13, 2006
Prepared for:
BRIDGE HARBOR, LLC
Greenville, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Irerracan
111-C West Fire Tower Road
Winterville, North Carolina 28590
[phone]

July 13, 2006
Bridge Harbor, LLC
1698 E. Arlington Boulevard
Greenville, North Carolina 27858
Attention: Mr. Harvey Lewis
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Washington, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 72065051
Dear Mr. Lewis:
1 rerracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
111-C West Fire Tower Road
Winterville, North Carolina 28590
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.terracon.com
Attached is our Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed Bridge Harbor Project in
Washington, North Carolina. Our services were provided in accordance with Terracon
Proposal No. P-6-087-72 dated June 6, 2006. Findings, conclusions and recommendations
given in this report are subject to the "General Comments" section of this report.
Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this report. We are
available to discuss our recommendations with you and to provide additional services as
necessary during the final design and construction phases of this project. _ w%"
Sincerely,
lf�r acn
Add rop
Holli E. Jones, E.I.T.
Geotechnical Professional
SEAL
16252
Fes, "
Carl F. Bonner, P.E.
Greenville Office Manager -7_13-7oo(e
Registered, North Carolina 16252
Reviewed by: Barney C. Hale, P.E.
Principal
Registered, North Carolina 11285
Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 1965
More Than 70 Offices Nationwide

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SITE EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
SITE CONDITIONS
1
1
E
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
RegionalGeology --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
SoilConditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Groundwater Conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Seismic Considerations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
Geotechnical Considerations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
Site Preparation and Earthwork---------------------------------------------------------------------------5
DeepFoundations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
Pavements-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7
GENERAL COMMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
APPENDIX
Site Location Plan
Boring Location Plan
Boring Logs
General Notes
Unified Soil Classification System

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
BRIDGE HARBOR PROJECT
HIGHWAY 17 SOUTH
WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
TERRACON PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
July 13, 2006
INTRODUCTION
The subsurface exploration for the proposed Bridge Harbor Project in Washington, North
Carolina has been completed. Six soil test borings were performed at the project site.
Individual boring logs and a boring location plan are included with this report. The purpose
of this geotechnical study was to explore the general subsurface conditions at the project
site and to evaluate these conditions with respect to the design and construction of
earthwork, foundations, and floor slabs for the project. Our scope of services included
drilling soil test borings, performing lab testing and engineering analyses, and preparing this
report of our findings and recommendations.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project information is based on our understanding of the project from our telephone
conversations, our site visit and site plans received via electronic mail from Mr. Sam Jarvis
on June 2, 2006.
The Bridge Harbor Project consists of developing an approximate 6 acre tract of land located
on the Pamlico River at the south end of the Highway 17 Bridge. We received two proposed
site layouts from Mr. Jarvis. One of the layouts includes three clusters of four adjacent
buildings along with common area building located near the access point to three piers. The
other layout includes four separate buildings and a clubhouse with a pool. This proposed site
layout also includes three piers.
The size and number of buildings for the site will depend on the soil conditions encountered.
We understand that three story buildings are desired. In addition, we understand that the site
is subject to CAMA Regulations and that the first floor of the buildings will be required to be
elevated.
SITE EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
In order to explore the general subsurface conditions at the project site, Terracon
subcontracted Carolina Drilling to drill six soil test borings to depths of 25 to 35 feet below
existing grades. The borings were advanced at the approximate locations shown on
Drawing No. 2 in the Appendix.
1

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
1rerracon
The borings were located in the field by Terracon personnel by measuring distances and
estimating right angles relative to existing site features. The location of the borings should
be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used.
The soil test borings were performed by a power drilling rig mounted on an all -terrain vehicle
using rotary wash drilling procedures. Representative soil samples were obtained by the
split -barrel sampling procedure. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, the number of blows
required to advance a standard 2-inch O.D. split -barrel sampler the last 12 inches of the
typical total 18-inch penetration by means of a 140-pound hammer with a free fall of 30
inches, is the standard penetration test (SPT) resistance value (N-Value) and was performed
in the soil test borings at 2.5 to 5 foot intervals. These values are indicated on the boring
logs at the depths of occurrence.
The samples were sealed and returned to the laboratory for classification. Field logs of each
boring were prepared by the drill crew. These logs included visual classifications of the
materials encountered during drilling as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface
conditions between samples.
Final boring logs included with this report include visual classification,. sampling depths and
penetration distance, and the standard penetration resistance values. The classification
represents the geotechnical engineer's interpretation of the field logs and includes
modifications based on visual observation, texture and plasticity, The descriptions of the
soils indicated on the boring logs are in accordance with the enclosed General Notes and the
Unified Soil Classification System. Estimated group symbols according to the Unified Soil
Classification System are given on the boring logs. A brief description of this classification
system is attached to this report.
Conditions encountered at each boring location are indicated on the individual boring logs.
The stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of
changes in soil types; in -situ, the transition between materials may be gradual. Variations in
subsurface conditions can also occur between boring locations.
SITE CONDITIONS
The project site is located east of the intersection of Highway 17 and Pamlico River in
Washington, North Carolina. On our site visit, we observed a grassed perimeter that
appeared to be the natural grade and then a larger mounded area in the middle of the site
that appeared to be filled with debris, such as pieces of concrete. In addition, we observed a
long narrow metal storage building, some abandoned equipment and several debris piles.
2

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13,2006
lferracon
The remains, of a bulk petroleum storage and distribution facility were observed on the south
end of the site.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Regional Geology
The project site is located in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province. The Coastal Plain
consists mainly of marine sediments that.were deposited during successive periods of
fluctuating sea level and moving shoreline. The soils in this province consist of sands, silts,
and clays with irregular deposits of shells, which are typical of those laid down in a shallow
sloping sea bottom. Alluvial sands, silts, and clays are typically present near rivers and
creeks.
According to the 1985 Geologic Map of North Carolina, the Washington area is generally
underlain by the Yorktown formation, a Tertiary deposit consisting of medium stiff to stiff,
massive marine clay, layers of medium dense to dense sand with shell fragments, and partially
cemented limestone.
Soli Conditions
Approximately 6 inches of topsoil was encountered at all boring locations. Fill materials were
encountered at the mound located on the project site near boring B-6. Recent alluvial
deposits were encountered in all of the borings as zones of very loose to medium dense
sand and very soft to stiff clay. Pieces of tree limbs, roots, and bark were encountered as
wood fragments to depths of 30 feet below the existing grade. At depths greater than 30
feet below existing grade, the borings encountered medium dense to very dense sand with
limestone fragments indicating the top of the Yorktown Formation.
Please note that wetlands delineation, the assessment of environmental conditions or
chemical testing for the presence of contaminants in the soil or groundwater of the site were
beyond the scope of the geotechnical services provided.
Groundwater Conditions
The use of drilling fluids in performing the borings can obscure the measurement of
groundwater levels. In sandy soils, the drilling fluids typically drain to a level that corresponds
to the groundwater level. Fluid levels were measured at the borings at the time of the
exploration. During the exploration, fluid levels were observed at depths of 2 to 4 feet.
P

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
1rerracon
Fluctuations in the groundwater table on the order of 1 to 2 feet are typical in the Coastal
Plain, depending on variations in precipitation, evaporation and surface water runoff.
Seasonal high groundwater levels are expected to occur during or just after the typically
wetter months of the year (November through April). Longer monitoring in piezometers or
cased holes would be required to evaluate longer -term groundwater conditions.
Based on the results of the borings and our previous experience in the area, we expect shallow
groundwater to be present at the site.
Seismic Considerations
Based on our borings and experience with the Yorktown Formation, the subsurface
conditions at the project site correspond most closely with those of Site Class D as described
in Section 1615.1.1 of the 2002 North Carolina State Building Code (2000 International
Building Code with North Carolina Amendments). This type classifies as a "stiff soil profile",
with an average standard penetration resistance (N-value) greater than or equal to 15 bpf
and less than 50 bpf.
Although loose sands are present at the site, we do not expect them to be subject to
liquefaction due to the amount of silt and clay present within the sand and the relatively low risk
of a strong seismic event in the vicinity of the site. Based on USGS data, the peak ground
acceleration associated with a seismic event having a 2% probability of exceedence in 50
years is expected to be 0.06g for Washington, North Carolina.
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Geotechnical Considerations
The borings generally encountered very loose to medium dense sand and very soft to stiff
clay with wood fragments to depths of 30 feet below the existing grade. The 35-foot borings
terminated, in very dense sand with limestone fragments. Groundwater was also
encountered at the borings at very shallow depths.
Based on the loose sand / soft clay in the upper portions of the subsurface profile, we
recommend that the buildings be founded on 12 inch square precast concrete piles driven to
depths of approximately 35 feet below existing grade. Concrete piles are recommended,
instead of timber piles, to help to penetrate through the wood pieces encountered in the
borings.
4

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
lrerracan
Recommendations for the design and construction of foundations and the support of on -
grade slabs and pavements are provided below.
Site Preparation and Earthwork
Site preparation should begin with stripping surface vegetation and topsoil. We expect the
surface soils at the site to be wet and loose after stripping. The use of wheel -mounted
construction equipment over the exposed subgrade soils should be minimized due to the risk of
excessive rutting. Therefore, we recommend light -weight, track mounted equipment be used
during site preparation and grading.
The fill mound in the middle of the site, debris piles, the existing building and old foundations
should be removed. As part of the demolition of the existing building, any existing surface and
subsurface features should be removed full -depth. Existing utilities that are to be abandoned
should be removed or filled with grout. The excavations resulting from removal of existing
structures and utilities should be properly backfilled with compacted structural fill as described
in the Earthwork section of this report. Utilities that are to remain in service should be
accurately located horizontally and vertically to minimize conflict with new foundation
construction.
After completing stripping, the exposed subgrade should be thoroughly observed and tested.
This testing should include proofrolling the subgrade. Proofrolling can be accomplished with
an empty, tandem -axle dump truck with rubber tires or other equipment providing an
equivalent subgrade loading. Proofrolling aids in delineating soft or disturbed areas that may
exist at or near the exposed subgrade level. Proofrolling should be performed in the
presence of a Terracon representative. Unstable areas observed at this time should be
improved by scarification and recompaction or by undercutting and replacement with suitable
compacted fill. Less undercutting will be needed if subgrade preparation is done in dryer
weather.
We suggest raising the site grades 2 to 3 feet to increase the separation distance from the
groundwater table and improve site drainage. All fill material should consist of sand with less
than 20% silt or clay, free of organics and debris. All proposed fill materials should be
approved prior to their use. Structural fill placed should be spread in 8- to 10-inch thick loose
lifts at a moisture content within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content of the material as
determined by ASTM D 698 (standard Proctor). Each lift of fill placed within structural areas
should be uniformly compacted to a dry density of at least 95 percent of the maximum dry
density of the material determined according to ASTM D 698.
5

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
lferracon
The geotechnical engineer's representative should perform in -place field density tests to
evaluate the compaction of the structural fill and backfill placed at the site. We recommend a
testing frequency of one test per lift per 2,500 square feet of fill area within the building and
pavement areas. At least one test per lift per 100 lineal feet of utility trench should also be
performed.
Deep Foundations
In consideration of CAMA regulations and the loose / soft soils present at the site, we
recommend using a deep foundation system consisting of approximately 35 feet deep, 12-inch
square precast concrete piles. There is a possibility of obstructions due to the presence of
wood pieces in the soil subsurface. Because of this, there is a potential need to offset piles if
obstructions are encountered.
The piles are expected to develop capacity from a combination of skin friction and end bearing
on very dense sands. We estimate that 12-inch square precast concrete piles driven to an
embedment depth of approximately 35 feet will develop an allowable compressive design
capacity of about 30 tons. The allowable uplift capacity would be about 20 tons.
Static pile analyses were used to estimate downward axial and uplift load capacities of single
vertical piles based on a factor of safety of 2.0 for download and uplift. The uplift capacities
reflect the frictional resistance between the sides of a pile and the surrounding soil. We
recommend that piles be spaced on -center no closer than the three times the pile butt diameter
or width; a center -to -center spacing of approximately 3 feet. The minimum spacing should be
maintained to prevent the pile group compression load capacity from being significantly less
than the summation of individual pile capacities. This spacing restriction also serves to limit
surface heave and to reduce the possibility of damaging previously installed piles.
We performed an LPILE Plus analysis assuming a capacity of 30 tons per pile and a fixed
head condition in a pile cap at the ground surface. A lateral load of 3 tons would produce
about 1/4 inch deflection.
We recommend that the pile driving rig be equipped with fixed leads, and the pile hammer
should have a rated energy of at least 19,000 foot pounds per blow for concrete piles. All
equipment should be subject to the review of the geotechnical engineer. We recommend that
piles be driven to the dynamic driving resistance required for the recommended design
capacity. The driving resistance may be determined by either the ENR formula or by a wave
equation driving analysis performed by the geotechnical engineer. Driving should be
9

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13,2006
1rerracan
terminated immediately if refusal (i.e., 8 to 10 blows per inch) is reached to prevent damaging
the piles.
The installation of a pile foundation system should be in accordance with the local and state
building code requirements. In addition, the installation of all piles should be monitored by the
geotechnical engineer. The geotechnical engineer's representative should verify and record all
aspects of the installation. In general, the representative should:
1. Be familiar with all aspects of the installation.
2. Be present continuously during driving.
3. Record the dimensions of each pile, locate, and report any obvious defects.
4. Count and record the blows for each foot of driving.
5. Record energy rating of hammer and adjust where appropriate for chamber
pressure, such as in the case of a diesel hammer.
6. Have knowledge of soil conditions at the site and the minimum required penetration
of each pile.
7. Be cognizant of intended support mechanisms of piles on which to base acceptance
or rejection or pre -drilling, etc.
8. Have authority to hold driving when unanticipated difficulties or conditions are
encountered.
The amount of settlement will depend upon the variations within the subsurface soil profile and
the applied load. Assuming that the piles are installed in accordance with our
recommendations, it is our opinion that total settlement will be about 1/2 inch.
Pavements
The on -site soils are typically adequate subgrade materials for the support of pavements.
Site preparation and new fill construction in the pavement areas should be performed as
outlined in the "Site Preparation and Earthwork" section of this report.
Because construction of pavements typically takes place near the end of construction, several
months after general site grading is performed, there is a potential for the pavement subgrade
to become disturbed during the course of the project due to construction traffic and weather.
Because of this, we recommend the pavement areas be rough graded and then proofrolled
with a loaded tandem axle dump truck a few days prior to paving. Particular attention should
be given to high traffic areas that were disturbed, and to areas where backfilled trenches are
located. Areas of unsuitable soils should be undercut and replaced with properly compacted
fill.
M

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
1rerracon
Assuming the pavement subgrade will consist predominately of the existing sandy soils, an
estimated saturated California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 6 was used in proportioning a flexible
pavement section. Similarly, a modulus of subgrade reaction value equal to 100 pounds per
cubic inch was used for design of rigid concrete pavement sections.
The pavement thicknesses below were calculated based on the design catalog of the
National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA). Traffic patterns and anticipated loading
conditions were not available; however, we anticipate that traffic loads will be produced
primarily by automobile traffic, waste disposal trucks and delivery trucks. Two pavement
sections have been provided for construction over an approved soil subgrade. The light -duty
pavement sections are for car traffic only. Heavy-duty pavement sections should be used for
main drives, loading areas and areas in front of waste containers.
TABLE 1
PAVEMENT THICKNESSES
THICKNESS (INCHES)
PAVEMENT
MATERIAL
Light -Duty
Heavy -Duty
TYPE
Rigid
Concrete
(4,000 psi)
5
7
Crushed Stone
(NCDOT ABC, Type A or B)
4
4
Flexible
Asphalt Concrete
(NCDOT Type S-9.5A or 1-2)
2
3
Crushed Stone
(NCDOT ABC, Type A or B)
6
8
Recommended paving material characteristics, taken from the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures, are included with
each pavement design recommendation. We note that the 2002 NCDOT Standard
Specifications for asphalt materials are based on "Superpave" mixes. Asphalt materials that
have been traditionally used for parking lots and driveways (Type 1-2 surface course) are
covered under the 1995 NCDOT Standard Specifications. Concrete pavement should be
air -entrained and have a minimum compressive strength of 4,000 psi after 28 days of
laboratory curing per ASTM C-31.
9

Bridge Harbor Project
Highway 17 South
Terracon Project No. 72065051
July 13, 2006
lrerracon
Prevention of infiltration of water into the subgrade is essential for the successful
performance of any pavement. Both the subgrade and the pavement surface should be
sloped to promote surface drainage away from the pavement structure.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so comments
can be made regarding interpretation, and implementation of our geotechnical
recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to
provide testing and observation during excavation, grading, foundation and construction
phases of the project.
The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained
from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in
this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between borings, across the
site, or due to the modifying effects of weather. The nature and extent of such variations may
not become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be
immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be
provided.
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any
environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification
or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about
the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the
project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site
safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the
event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report are
planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be
considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the
conclusions of this report in writing.

APPENDIX

UNITED STATES — DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR — GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
k
r 1 +s \ c > �` :, r•� '�' �` `�-"p'
\ ta; ix; ° b... \�° ts. a � �; � ..# �k ,k• )r\���,�r:%• wY Lr'\�/ `.
0
1
a
SI IR IFCT..CITF 12.
SCALE 1:24 000
1 .5 0 RILOMETERS 1 2
1000 0 METERS 1000 2000
1 .5 0 1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50M 6000 7000 5000 9D00 10 000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
TOPO LINES REPRESM 10—FOOT CONTOURS
QUADRANGLE
WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
1951 PR1983
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
" CB
o.'�.
"" 72085051
M
1rerrac
TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
FIG. No.
pmBg01
ASSHOWN
n Tl
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
R�No.
BRIDGE HARBOR CONDOS
CB
OEOiiOF%1.1
7lWR Ra'tl
HIGHWAY 17 AND BRIDGE STREET
CS
JUNE2006
91
WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA

DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
(FT.)
0.0
0.5
3.5
6.0
8.0
.I
II
23.
1
28
To soil a rox. 0.5' .
Medium dense moist to saturated tan and brown silty
fine to medium SAND (SM).
Medium dense saturated black silty slightly clayey fine
to medium SAND (SC) with shell fragments.
SAND
Loose saturated gray medium to coarse (SW�.
Soft to medium sfiff saturated black silty fine sandy
CLAY (CL) with wood fragments.
5 Medium stiff saturated gray and tan silty CLAY (CM.
5 Medium dense saturated gray medium to coarse SAND
(SW).
.5 Very dense saturated gray medium to coarse SAND (SP)
with rock fragments.
'0 Boring terminated at 35 feet.
40.0
Classified By: L. Cutrell
Driller: Carolina Drilling
Drill Rig: CME 45
Boring Type: Mud Rotary
GROUNDWATER READINGS
DATE Tfla DEPDi I ELEVATION STABILIZATION TDAE
Q 612I/2006 24 his - 3.5 --
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
• PENETRATION - BLOW S/FOOT
1t
D
sn
T
i
21
Q
15
8
6
6 1
2 1
4 1
17 1
54/6"
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B-I
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
■

• PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
(FT,)
0.0
To soil a rox. 0.5' .
Loose moist tan silty fine to coarse SAND (SM).
Loose to medium dense moist to saturated gray and
black fine to coarse SAND (SW) with gravel.
IX
Very soft to soft saturated black and brown silty fine
sandy CLAY (CL) with wood fragments.
Boring terminated at 25 feet.
40.0
Classified By: L. CLtrell
Driller: Carolina Drilling
Drill Rig: CME 45
Boring Type: Mud Rotary
GROUND'
jZtrztnoac
ATER READINGS
DATE
TEvffi
DEPTH
ELEVATION
STABILIZATION TIME
7Ahrs
3.9
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
•
D
•
9
34
18
5
3
WOH
2
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B-2
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
a I [�hT�T1I

DEPTH DESCRIPTION
(FT.)
0.0
0.5
i
I
25.0
i
—Topsoil (approx. 0.51.
Very loose to medium dense moist to saturated gray,
and brown fine to coarse SAND (SW) with wood
fragments.
40.0
Classified By: L. Cutrell
Driller. CarolinaDrilling
Drill Rig: CNM 45
Boring Type: Mud Rotary
AO
G
UNDWA17iR READINGS
DATE MEDEPTH ELEVATION STABILIZATION TIME
Q fiY11/2006 1A6rs l.e
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
• PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT
•
8
3
2
2
6 I
16
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B-3
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
PAGE 1 OF 1
Irerracon
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
• PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT
•
8
3
2
2
6 I
16
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B-3
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
PAGE 1 OF 1
Irerracon

DEPTH DESCRIPTION
(FT.)
0.0
0.5
3.0
IS'
35.,
To soil (approx. 0.51.
Loose moist to saturated brown fine to come SAND
(SIN).
Very soft to soft saturated brown and black silty fine
sandy CLAY (CL) with wood fragments.
Very loose to medium dense saturated gray silty fine to
medium SAND (SM),Arith rock fragments at 33.5 to 35
feet.
Boring terminated at 35 feet.
40.0
Classified By: L. Cutrell
Driller. Carolina Drilling
Drill Rig: CMffi 45
Boring Type: Mud Rotary
GROUNDWATERRHADINGS
DATE TIME DEPTH ELEVATION STABILIZATION TH&
a&W2006 24W 1.8
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
0 PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT
0
0
0
0
9
2
2
WOH
2 1
2 1
23 1
15
50111,
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B4
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
lkl= N-11v I

DEPTH DESCRIPTION
0.0
0.5
3.0
i
6.0
ii
i
I
25.0
—Topsoil approx. 0.51.
> ��
Loose moist tan and brown fine to medium SAND
(SW).
Very loose saturated brown and black silty slightly
clayey fine to medium SAND (SM).
Very soft to stiff saturated gray, tan and black silty fine
sandy CLAY (CL) with wood fragments
Boring terminated at 25 feet.
40.0
Classified By: L. Cutrell
Driller: Carolina Drilling
Drill Rig: CAM 45
Boring Type: Mud Rotary
GROUND'
ATP.R READINGS
SZcntnoos
DATE
77h7e
DP.PTf1
ELEVATION
STA311L TfON MIS
utB
s.s
SEE KEY SHEET FOR EXPLANATION
OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
• PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT
C
•
•
C
9V
T
4
2
WOH
2
2
2
9
BORING LOG
BORING NUMBER B-5
DATE DRILLED 6/20/2006
PROJECT NUMBER 72065051
PROJECT Bridge Harbor Project; Washington, NC
lfilr4 N v1q01 I I

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA
Soil Classification
Group
Symbol
Group Name°
Coarse Grained Soils
Gravels
Clean Gravels
Cu z 4 and 1 s Cc 5 36
GW
Well -graded gravelF
More than 50% retained
More than 50% of coarse
fraction retained on
Less than 5%fines`
Cu <4 and/or 1 > Cc> Y
GP
Poorly graded raveIr
Y 9 9
on No. 200 sieve
No. 4 sieve
Gravels with Fines More
Fines classify as ML or MH
GM
Silty gravel'-"
than 12% fines`
Fines classify as CL or CH
GC
Clayey gravel`°"
Sands
Clean Sands
Cu z 6 and 1 5 Cc 5 3E
SW
Well -graded sand'
50% or more of coarse
fraction passes
Less than 5%fines°
Cu <6 and/or 1 > Cc> 3e
SP
Poorly graded sand'
Y
No. 4 sieve
Sands with Fines
Fines classify as ML or MH
SM
- Silty sand°.H.'
More than 12%foes°
Fines Classify as CL or CH
SC
Clayey sandal
Fine -Grained Soils
Silts and Clays
inorganic
PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line'
CL
Lean clay"M
50% or more passes the
Liquid limit less than 50
PI <4 or plots below "A"line'
ML
Slll"`"
No. 200 sieve
organic
Liquid limit -oven dried
Organic clay"`.",N
<0.75
OL
Liquid limit -not dried
Organic silt"AN.-
Silts and Clays
inorganic
PI plots on or above "A" line
CH
Fat clay"A"'
Liquid limit 50 or more
PI lots below "A" line
MH
Elastic SIIf`•"
organic
Liquid limit - oven dried
Organic clay"+'"R
<0.75
OH
Liquid limit -not dried
Organic silt"A^'O
Highly organic soils
Primarily organic matter, dark In
color, and organic odor
PT
Peat
"Based on the material passing the 3-in. (75-mm) sieve
a If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add'With cobbles
or boulders, or both" to group name.
c Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well -graded
gravel with silt, GW-GC well -graded gravel with clay, GP -GM poorly
graded gravel with silt, GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay.
° Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well -graded
sand with silt, SW -SC well -graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded
sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
z
"Cu = Deo/Dio Cc = Doo
Dto x Deo
F If soil contains 2 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name.
off fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC -GM, or SC-SM.
60
bTf
c.
W 40
O
Z
30
U
U) 20
0-
10
7
4
0
0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
"If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name.
If soil contains z 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name.
If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay.
K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add 'With sand" or'With
gravel," whichever is predominant.
If soil contains z 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add
"sandy'to group name.
If soil contains z 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add
"gravelly" to group name.
"PI z 4 and plots on or above "A" line.
°PI < 4 or plots below "A" line.
PI plots on or above "A" line.
°PI plots below "A" line.
For classification of fine-grained
soils and fine-grained fraction
of coarse -grained soils�p0
Equation of"A" - line
Horizontal at PI=4 to LL=25.5.
then PI=0.73 (LL-20)
O`Z`
Equation of "U" -line
o�
Vertical at LL--16 to PI=7.
G�
then PI=0.9 (LL-8)
G�6
MH or
OH
MLorOL
-_ L'
i
Form 111_6/98 1 rerracon

GENERAL NOTES
DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS:
SS:
Split Spoon -1 3/8" I.D., 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted
HS:
Hollow Stem Auger
ST:
Thin -Walled Tube - 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted
PA:
Power Auger
RS:
Ring Sampler- 2.42" I.D., 3" O.D., unless otherwise noted
HA:
Hand Auger
DB:
Diamond Bit Coring - 4", N, B
RB:
Rock Bit
BS:
Bulk Sample or Auger Sample
WB:
Wash Boring or Mud Rotary
The number of blows required to advance a standard 2-inch O.D. split -spoon sampler (SS) the last 12 inches of the total 18-inch
penetration with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches is considered the "Standard Penetration" or "N-value".
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS
WL:
Water Level
WS:
While Sampling N/E: Not Encountered
WCI:
Wet Cave in
WD:
While Drilling
DCI:
Dry Cave in
BCR:
Before Casing Removal
AB:
After Boring
ACR:
After Casing Removal
Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the times indicated. Groundwater levels at other
times and other locations across the site could vary. In pervious soils, the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater. In
low permeability soils, the accurate determination of groundwater levels may not be passible with only short-term observations.
DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Soil classification is based on the Unified Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have
more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine
Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are
plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non -plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be
added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse -grained soils are defined on the basis
of their in -place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency.
CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS
RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE -GRAINED SOILS
Standard
Unconfined
Penetration or
Standard Penetration
Compressive
N-value (SS)
or N-value (SS)
Strength. Qu. psf
Blows/Ft.
Consistency
Blows/Ft.
Relative Density
< 500
500 — 1,000
<2
2-3
Very Soft
Soft
0-3
Very Loose
1,001 — 2,000
4-6
Medium Stiff
4-9
10-29
Loose
Medium Dense
2,001 — 4,000
7-12
Stiff
30-49
Dense
4,001 — 8,000
13-26
Very Stiff
50+
Very Dense
8,000+
26+
Hard
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL
GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY
Descriptive Term(s)
of other
Percent of
Malor Component
constituents
DryWetaht
of Sample
Particle Size
Trace
With
< 15
Boulders Over 12 in. (300mm)
Modifier
15-29
Cobbles 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75 mm)
> 30
Gravel 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm)
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS
OF FINES
Sand #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm)
Silt or Clay Passing #200 Sieve (0.075mm)
Descriptive Terms) of other
Percent of
PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION
constituents
Dry Weight
Term Plasticity Index
Trace
<5
Non -plastic 0
With
5-12
Low 1-10
Modifiers
> 12
Medium 11-30
High 30+
Irerracon

Beverly Haves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey ). Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 2, 2009
a
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Brian Rubina
Quible and Associates, PC
PO Box 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949-0870
Re: Bridge Harbor Marina, Beaufort County, ER 09-0140
Dear Mr. Rubina,
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
We have reviewed the two alternative designs for the proposed Bridge Harbor Marina in Beaufort County.
There is. a reported shipwreck site immediately downtiver of the existing piers. If Alternative A is selected, the
proposed construction will not have an effect on that site and no archaeological investigations are necessary.
If Alternative B is selected, which includes the construction of a new pier downriver of the existing piers, we
recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify the
presence and significance of submerged archaeological remains lying within the project boundaries. Potential
effects on those resources should be assessed prior to the initiation of construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.atch.dcr.state.nc.us/consults. The archaeologists listed, or any_other experienced
archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended investigation.
The above cominents are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Eatley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
con-nnunication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced tracking number.
Sincerely, �Q
Lu_ - - 'l-
ter Sandbeck
•�� �+r',nce arreer, n1mgn t5.0 zfbul Mailing Address: 4617 Mad SeMce Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Teleplione/Fax: [phone]-6599

Quible
IN5 50 2�s
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
P.O. Drawer 870
IGtty Hawk, NC 27949
SINCE 1959
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
May 5, 2009
Josephs. Lassltoc C.E.P.
Eduardo J. ValdMeso, P.E.
Sean McKenna
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlout P.E.
Division of Marine Fisheries
Katherine C. Morchello, P.L.S.
946 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Bridge Harbor, LLC
Dear Mr. McKenna:
An environmental assessment (EA) is currently being prepared by Quible & Associates, P.C.
(Quible), on behalf of Bridge Harbor, LLC for review by the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM), the State Clearinghouse and associated state and federal regulatory
agencies. On March 4, 2009 at the NCDENR Washington Regional Offices, there was an inter-
agency scoping meeting to discuss this project, and you were in attendance.
The proposed project involves an open water marina and a boat dry stack facility with a boat
drop structure. Prior to the scoping meeting, three conceptual marina layouts were provided for
discussion purposes. After the meeting, based on agency comments and client needs for the
future project scope, a new design that is similar to the concepts used at the scoping meeting
was developed. I have attached a copy of the current proposed design.
The project will not require any dredging, and the existing pilings to be removed will be
replaced, whereas, there will be a net gain in pilings (and fish habitat opportunities) as we
discussed at the scoping meeting.
Please supply any information that will help unto complete the fish and shellfish resources and
habitat sections of the EA, including any pertinent sampling data for the area. For a different
recent project on the Pamlico River I received some general gill net survey data for all of the
DMF locations in the Upper Pamlico. I will plan on using that same data for this EA unless you
are able to provide any additional representative data. Along with the marina plan, I have
included a USGS vicinity map. Your input is appreciated and will be used in the final document.
You can reach Brian Rubino at Quible & Associates, PC (252.261.3300 or [e-mail])
if you wish to discuss anything in relation to this request for fisheries information. Thanks for
your attention to this project.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associate, P.C.
Brian Rubino
CC: Parker Overton, Bridge Harbor, LLC

Quible
«tAEs60 CITEM V.L-.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
May 5, 2009
Ronald Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
101 Pivers Island Road
Beaufort, NC 28516
RE: Bridge Harbor, LLC
Dear Mr. Sechler:
P.O. Drawer 870
My Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassltec C.E.P.
Eduardo J. ValdMeso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anloul, P.E.
Katherine C. Morchello, PLS.
An environmental assessment (EA) is currently being prepared by Quible & Associates, P.C.
(Quible), on behalf of Bridge Harbor, LLC for review by the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM), the State Clearinghouse and associated state and federal regulatory
agencies. On March 4, 2009 at the NCDENR Washington Regional Offices, there was an inter-
agency scoping meeting to discuss this project, and you were in attendance via phone.
The proposed project involves an open water marina and a boat dry stack facility with a boat
drop structure. Prior to the scoping meeting, three conceptual marina layouts were provided for
discussion purposes. After the meeting, based on agency comments and client needs for the
future project scope, a new design that is similar to the concepts used at the scoping meeting
was developed. I have attached a copy of the current proposed design.
The project will not require any dredging, and the existing pilings to be removed will be
replaced, whereas, there will be a net gain in pilings (and fish habitat opportunities) as we
discussed at the scoping meeting.
Please supply any information that will help us to complete the fish and shellfish resources and
habitat sections of the EA, including any pertinent sampling data for the area. Along with the
marina plan, I have included a USGS vicinity map. Your input is appreciated and will be used in
the final document. You can reach Brian Rubino at Quible & Associates, PC (252.261.3300 or
[e-mail]) if you wish to discuss anything in relation to this request for fisheries
information. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Sincerely,
Quible ^& Associate, P.C.
Brian Rubino
CC: Parker Overton, Bridge Harbor, LLC

BEAU ORTi / I
„I<P11r—..
1 k Herring Run (Runyan Creek) 1 ``
4—
Pam ico-Tar Rtverj�-at
1{-1j Broad Creek `T-I-
_ a I Upper Goose Creek
_ 1� �- Chocowln� Bay 1 I ` � — - e< - " �� �; )
�1h]M�allardCreek
l
Calf Tree Creek 11 m r I
w - � i11 Bath Creek
I u..rz '� 11 Duck Creek / _ l
Creek�i ee
\� A.
\ '
A
Blounta Creek
Nevil Creek ]1 p-
Barns Cree51 q � r
It
,I'r�\ Durham Creek 1�r I1 _.
I
- - r t
k�w.... I �"
CAUEN'
--COUN
�� i - 1 I/ •�' 1 Lacks Creek 11 u ivk, �! : '
This map was produced for illustrative purposes as a general grade to /` t ^'_ Whltehurst Creek
assist the public. Informational data used for this map were collected i i-
from federal, state, county, and private organizations. While every
effort is made to keep this map accurate and up-to-date, it is not
Intended to replace any official source. Under no circumstances shall the I r t l South Creek 1 u
State of North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omisslons made-
". from reliance on any information contained herein from whatever source nor _
shall the State be liable for any other consequences from any such reliance.
Mliltary Danger .\: gountla w
Zones and ry Descriptive Boundaries for Descriptive Boundaries for
Restricted Areas ®MDZRA Coastal -Joint -Inland Waters Map Datum: W83
0I Lat/Longpoint Coastal -Joint -Inland Waters Map projection: NC State Plana
Date♦�.
wBoundary 05A NCAC 03Q .0202) Map 1:18 May 2008
N6 Coastal Waters tt3gzeo MARINE
z000 o z000 g000 Yards I�LSt$tIFS
/Yt'Z Joint Waters
locator map ^,. ft Inland Waters Map 10 t ° t z 3 Miles a.

moo...«,.'�`
off
fw
LPam I River .0704 3 ' �..� ''
✓ ��j'
x
i
,•dim :Z ;
It
L
p was produced for illustrative u / —
p rposes as a general guide to I --
e public. Informational data used for this map were collected
eral, state, county, and private organizations. While every
made to keep this map accurate and up-to-date, it is not
Intended to replace any officlal source. Under no circumstances shall the _ ` i
North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omissions made V
ance on any information contained herein from whatever source nor State be liable for any other consequences from any such reliance.
Areas
Surveyfa65'Rosresle planimetric maps. ical rO Primary Fishery Nursery Areas
Permanent Secondary
Special Secondary
Ale ® Milltary Danger
Zones and
locator map Restricted Areas
inland waters(WRC juristllctlon) Map 2
MaP Datum: NAD83
Map Projection: NC State Plane
Map Date: July2006 MARINE
2000 0 Yards
®2000 pi u
t®2 Miles «
e<

Obs Species
CPUE Set
1 Atlantic Menhaden
427.14
22
2 Striped Mullet
68.23
22
3 White Perch
47.23
22
4 Gizzard Shad
20.00
22
5 Striped Bass
13.55
22
6 Hickory Shad
13.18
22
7 Blue Crab
7.41
22
8 Southern Flounder
5.55
22
9 Longnose Gar
1.96
22
10 Cownose Ray
1.77
22
11 Spot
1.09
22
12 Redhorse Suckers
0.86
22
13 Common Carp
0.82
22
14 Red Drum
0.73
22
15 Bluefish
0.46
22
16 White Catfish
0.36
22
17 Silver Redhorse
0.32
22
18 Blue Catfish
0.27
22
19 Bowfin
0.18
22
20 Largemouth Bass
0.18
22
21 American Shad
0.09
22
22 Black Crappie
0.09
22
23 Spotted Seatrout
0.09
22
24 Ladyfish
0.05
22
25 Pumpkinseed
0.05
22
26 Silver Perch
0.05
22
IF STATGRID IN (353100770100, 353000770000, 352900765900);