GP89802A - NCDOT-Bridge #8

9I11CAMA [DREDGE & FILL
a GENERAL PERMIT
No 89802
Previous permit
Date previous permit issued _
A B C D
�New ❑ Modification [:]Complete Reissue []Partial Reissue
As authorized by the State of North Caro,/Iy''n�aa Department of Environmental Quality and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to:
ISA NCAC 07 a3C� / '/ ' 1� ❑ Rules attached. General Permit Rules available at the following link wvnvdeq.nc goy/CAMArules
Applicant Name N L 0 D -1
Address p lOOJ7 61k1} Q.t.b4f Die.
City 9A41=1(.4-S.. bl(i ZIP D1761O
Phone #(-Ih) y 7b7 " -157 J,
Email M19-��� o I Qo✓ -
Authorized Agent /TN1G PLL-Ipv�G
Project Location (County): DARE
Street Add State Road/Lot #(s)&Q1Fr _
tk 1J0. D
Mfg SLISS11 C 461r,
Subdivision
City 14AT TE&,A$ ZIP
Affected ❑ CW RfEW ZPTA WES ❑ pTS Adj. Wtr. Body - -. - IAA r-& K &man/unk)
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ IHA El UW ❑ SPIMA ❑ PWS Closest Maj. Wt, Body P ® A -MU CO 50VNF)
ORW: yese PNA: yes/0
Type of Project/
Finger pier(s)
Co Fru nAA 5TR,,trveYz, ()TiL-aEP A5 gF-tAw£ C6r6TZ-Y'TIDJJ
MpF��,J/ c3Ns1Df.:XED aQ�» �o slA 1. SF BF
Total Platform area f�.M��p E-P 1 �p (.c**II`-1 PtO.L091466 PrTD&D or/ oFOXI -
Groinlength/# w1�+t F.P`t tjo-rt� ° 1"atN brm
Bulkhead/ ipra length. I5
Avg distance offshore t' 10,
Breakwater/Sill a
Max distance/length o
Basin, channel
Cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing - -
OtherIS'.Lt aSPAPJ W-,b,&ft
PA7f-LtN6 - '�?3or 6*U
1�trRAZJ 6-.6Prz O.4!IiaA
SAV observed: yes 4n
Moratorium: n/a yes 48
Site Photos 4D
no Riparian Waiver Attached: yes
A building permit/zoning permit may be required by: 12A14
Permit Conditionsl'/.p1PvEt.DPAF.�.ir Av4iizt26D Qv tests fERAsi'"t_ eb.Jt.r RE t.,�t...
TAR/PAM/NEUSE/BUFFER (circle one)
❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules
See additional notes/conditions on back
I AM AWARE or STATUTES, CRC RULES AND CONDITIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECTAND REVIEWED COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
(Please Initial) % �!
Michael Turchy
C,KE� DAlls"
Agent or Applican[PRINTED ame
permit Officer's PRINTED Name
c.tn.
Si nature'*Please read compliance statement o
ack of permit'*
Signature
800.0� t v 13S
'
1 C, �� y
dYa lie 1-ZA1'' i�o FxPiQrXi��.
ANr -rO
Application Feels)
Check#/Money Order
Issuing ate
Expiratio Date y

This permit is subject to compliance with this application and permit conditions. Any violation of these terms may
subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for
compliance. The applicant certifies by signing this permit that: 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this
permit, the applicant will confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the
local land use plan and all local ordinances, and 2) a written statement from the adjacent riparian property owner(s)
has been obtained, or proof of delivery of certified mail notification of the adjacent riparian property owner(s).
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
1-1 Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules
for the River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the
NC Division of Water Resources. If you have any questions, please contact the Division of Water Resources at the
Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington Regional Office (910-796-7215).
Permit Conditions:
�' �� 1 ''� ► �_ � �! s 1I �. �� ��I. � • � i oaf
Please ensure all debris associated with the removal or construction of the permitted development is contained within the authorized
project area and disposed of in an appropriate upland location.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/1-888-4RCOAST Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven - south of the Neuse River, Onslow
Counties)
Elizabeth City District
401 S. Griffin St. Ste, 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
(Serves: Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Hertford,
Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cm/dcm-home
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Craven - north of the Neuse River, Hyde, Pamlico,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover and Pender Counties)
Revised 6/01/2021

E11CAMA [DREDGE & FILL Nv 89802 ® A B C D
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit
Date previous permit issued
#[.New
❑ Modification [_]Complete Reissue ❑ Partial Reissue
As authorized by the 1S1tate of North Carol' a, Department of Environmental Quality and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to:
15A NCAC 0 I M . � r0 r t 1(000 ❑ Rules attached. V General Permit Rules available at the following link: wwwdeq nc gov/CAMArules
Applicant Name �t 1`t G 0 O T e Authorized Agent MIC 15L � 1 V r aj
Address 100P> 151411 FTDGE D2. Project Location (County): n DA915�I
City RALL=I(ati State L' jN� ZIP a%6i10 StreetAddr ss/State Road/Lot#(s) Rflb- rp 00. D
Phone#( ) 107 io1.77 I�(i �Wsl I� b-mg SOsil Li-tfl,
Email M0."IVEC h.l co- I\Ll7 oi'. 010✓ Subdivision
City 1L['��5� ZIP
Affected ❑cW 2rEW ZPTA WES ❑PTS Adj. Wtr. Body JLRS MQ� CaiI K &man/unk)
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ IHA ❑ UW ❑ SPIMA ❑ PWS Closest Mal. Wtr. Body
ORW: yesE) PNA: yes 4
Type of Project/ Activity 9V AC& 6XISTI06 B>< >6,t( $bIL SSFA-)W ITA NF,w �� (gS 1126FAa) ON EA-ST11J4
It. lic-oi mwl-w JA AP RAMA& ua kNi TF,Af6zAr4 COFfF.a WILL EA u 1 1,12hD &N 1 7D tale: �//� )
Shoreline Length <SOOJ IEPAI VrLII IEIj IL l.vCAT�.D /.�yp I,uAj1R L10115 wilt gF goP-
Access Length ��Aw s ATT/�r'{ED AJD I CD(LPD�fF�D �r`S �b %P-A tT .
1 Pier (dock) length 1 '1
Fixed Plafform(s) v ilig-ILXaf- SIX P r->06t> 07163 d-OX3
FloatingPlatform(s) )NUTILIITES ' 'FIVE (7)pDAtF,� +�%� o�01,i0�
Finger pier(s) -• �,pTF D/�tf� Sry1T,,<TvGe, 074a.EP AS Ipj�tiJa♦i Ei7N5'��L'•rll)J:i
P4Ff+L161.0Cq��NSIDF,Rk�`rEM�tlR"�e /kID Skull BF gF
Total Platform area " PrAo`4EO F9 lC4 0E-+J tlo. LOWC�F& POFD%D OQ VPQxf
Groin length/Jt V,JR.1 (fw ).lore. �.� DIsM
Bulkhead/ ipra lengthF
Avg distance offshore t' 19,
Breakwater/Sill
Max distance/length e
Basin, channel
Cubic yards
Boat ramp �•
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other °ISrL,.15NN-J gl+tb(.E
WATFe-LINE • Ji0, eaq
in'�C.#Wy-
9/r(�In
SAV observed:
yes no
Moratorium: n/a
yes QUO
Site Photos:
49
Riparian Waiver Attached:
yes no
TAR/PAM/NEUSE/BUFFER (circle one)
See note on back regarding River Basin rules
See additional notes/conditions on back
I AM AWARE OF STATUTES, CRC RULES AND CONDITIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT AND REVIEWED COMPLIANCE STATEMENT. (Please Initial)
6&4 DAISW
Agent or Applicant PRINTED Name Permit Officer's PRINTEDjName
(. M�
Si nature "Please read compliance statement on ack of permit•' Signature
�goo•oo ___ _____lw--&s yll�SL�A,i, ab130llg1� NOFOPAT46%) EuAw?To
Application Feels) Check #/Money Order Issuing Date r Expiratioh Date
&C, 136• LM lg

RECEIVE D,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MAR 0 9 2023
UCM-EC
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J. ER1c BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 1, 2023
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Resources N.C. Div. of Coastal Management
Regulatory Field Office 151 Transportation Permitting Branch 401 South Griffin St
Patton Avenue, Room 208 1617 Mail Service Center Ste 300
Asheville, NC 28805 Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Elizabeth City, NC 27909
ATTN: Mr. Kyle Barnes, Mr. Garry Ward Mr. Greg Daisey
NCDOT Coordinator NCDOT Coordinator NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Application for CAMA General Permit for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 8 over
Slash Creek on NCI in Hatteras, Dare County, North Carolina; TIP No. B-5610; Federal Aid
Project No. NHP-0012(0016); Debit $400 from WBS No. 45565.1.2
Dear Sirs,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 86-foot,
five -span bridge with a 95-foot, two -span bridge on existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained using
an off -site detour. After input from residents in the vicinity, the project was redesigned to address
concerns with the original design.
Impacts to wetland have been avoided for this project. There will be 95 linear feet of permanent stream
impact to Slash Creek due to riprap fill at the bridge approaches, and <0.006 acre for riprap fill at the end
of two pipes for stormwater discharge. Cofferdams will be used for the removal of the existing interior
bents and construction of end bents for the new structure resulting in 15 feet (0.027 acre) of temporary
impact.
Aerial utilities will be relocated with no impact to jurisdictional resources. The water line currently
attached to the bridge will be directionally bored under Slash Creek, also resulting in no impacts to
jurisdictional resources.
Please see enclosed copies of the Division of Coastal Management Major Permit Forms 1 and 5, permit
drawings, stormwater management plan, and utility drawings for the above referenced project. A Type IA
Categorical Exclusion was completed in July 2019 and distributed shortly after. Additional copies are
available at the NCDOT website: https://xfer.services.nedot.gov//pdea/EnvironmentalDocs/
This project calls for a letting date of October 17, 2023 and a review date of August 29, 2023.
Mailing Address: Location:
NC DEPARTMENT of TRANSPGRTATIGN Telephone:[phone] 100013RCHRm EDME
EN oNtfl mN ANALYs15 UNrr Customer Service: 1.877-368A968 RaRGHNC27610
1598 MAIL SERWCECENTER
RanGHNC27699-1598 Websile: w .ncdol.gov

NCDOT hereby requests that the proposed work be authorized under:
404 Regional General Permit 50
401 Water Quality Certification corresponding to the RGP 50. Authorization to debit the $240
Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 45565.1.2 is hereby given.
CAMA General Permit: NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal
Area Management Act General Permit. Adjacent riparian landowner certified mail return receipts
will be provided once they are received. Authorization to debit the $800 Permit Application Fee
from WBS Element 45565.1.2 is hereby given.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https://xfer.services.ncdot.goy/pdea/PermApp Should you have any questions regarding this
information, please contact Jason Dilday at [phone] [e-mail].
cerely, //��
4'e
Michael Tur ECAP Group Leader
Environmental Analysis Unit
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC

DON NP4
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation
B-5610
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Jason
Dilday
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
If additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
Slate
1581 Mail Service Center
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
276991581
us
919-707-6531 ext.
Street Address (if different from above)
City
Stale
1000 Birch Ridge Dr
Raleigh
NC
T2'7610-
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent(ContractorInformation
Business Name
N/A
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
- -
ext,
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
RECEIVE'
<Form continues on back>
MAR a a W3
252.808-2808 .. 1-88U-a it C 0 ASr .. www.nccoastalmanagement

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
Slate Rd. #
Dare
Bridge No. 8 over Slash Creek
NC 12
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Hatteras
NC
27943-
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A- - ext.
N/A, I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pasquotank
Slash Creek
c. Is the water body Identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Pamlico Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Dare County Planning District
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
220 ft. (approximately 110 ft. on each shore)
Appoximate Project Area=90,000 sq. ft.
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
5 ft. ❑NHW or ®NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Maintained/disturbed vegetation, salt marsh
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Roadway, bridge, buildings, utilitites
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Commercial, residential
h. How does local government zone the tract?
1. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Commercial, residential
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? []Yes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. []Yes []No ®NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA r
National Register listed or eligible property? R E C
<Form continues on next page>
EIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
EC
.IZ UUi C11 Ii I

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? []Yes ®No
(!it) If yes to either (i) or (it) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial OPublic/Government
❑Private/Community
It. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Roadway and bridge for public transportation use
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Proposed construction utilizing coffer dams. Typical construction equipment includes crane, excavator, dump trucks, etc.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Replace existing timber bridge with a cored slab concrete bridge and pedestrian/roadway improvements along NC 12.
Existing utilites will also be relocated within righ-of-way or easements to accommodate roadway/bridge improvements.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New work
f. what is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 2.0 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes []No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Both the existing and proposed bridges drains to closed systems on either end that discharge into Slash Creek. The existing
15" CMP on the west side is being replaced with a 36" CAAP, and the 15" CMP on the east side is being replaced with a 30"
CARP.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes []No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA R E C E
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
MAR 0 9 2023
nCnn_E-C
%157 nQa 2H03 ,.,.' s F a l "I :I u a q u m r• r, t. a et

Form DCM M P-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (Q are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Welland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to a best/of my knowledge.
Date 31y �2, �23 Print Name IC
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC
2.S?_808 21108 ". 1 H6e-4KCOASr :: wW"111 nusl ..:

Palmatier LLC-Primary Owner
P.O. Box 580
Hattera, NC 27943
Daniels, Darrell A & Lorna 5
P.O. Box 1087
Manteo, NC 27954
Oden, Jeffrey L & Kathleen R
P.O. Box 374
Hatteras, NC 27943
Hatteras Village Medical Assoc.
P.O. Box 1000
Manteo, NC 27954
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC

Form ACM MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
Concrete
e. (!)Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 85 ft.
Ili) Width of existing bridge: 28 ft.
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 3.7 ft.
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) all
g. Length of proposed bridge: 95 ft.
I. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water Flow? []Yes ®No
Ifyes,explain: N/A
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 3.9 ft.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: N/A
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Slash Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
5.0 ft.
f. (1) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert: N/A
(III) Width of existing culvert: N/A
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: N/A
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) N/A
h. Width of proposed bridge: 48 ft.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: The navigational opening is increasing
slightly.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? []Yes ®No
Ifyes,explain: N/A
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: N/A
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed: RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
n-CNA_F-c
75stit)8 H 0 i :: '1-88r- I;ECf )A>"I

< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? []Yes []No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s): _
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s): _
(iv) Height of the lop of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9 Width of proposed culvert: _
I. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
[]Yes []No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
C. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ONO
If yes,
(n) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 45'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 8'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3_5'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 34 cy
Total (See c ennit drawinas for breakdown of excavation
at each end bent).
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
N/A
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
L/lrl -EC
1'il4;03-2808 :. 1-e;W IIIWOASl .: wvrw.,v,-,xu' '

F'OrM MIA MP-5 (Bridges and CO,,I, "age 3 of '5)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by the contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: Unknown
(Ili) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? []Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. N/A
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. N/A
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes No
If yes,
(it) Avg. length of area to be filled: 10'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 90'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Roadway fill and rip rap (See permit
drawings)
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described In Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
N/A
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 60'
(Ili) Avg. width of area to be filled: 18'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Roadway fill and rip rap (See permit
drawings)
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing to Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ®Yes []No detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: This project includes relocation of water, If yes, explain: N/A
power, and telecommunications. Telecommunications
and power will remain aerial along the project. Water
will be directionally bored under The Slash. No impacts
to jurisdictional features will occur.
RECEIVED
If this portion of the proposed project has already received MAR 0 9 2023
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
DCM-EC
1_,? 808 :Z808 :. 1 888 4RGOWi I -: .,..,,. -. ,

Torin ®CIM MP-5 (Bridges and?', '
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes NNo controlled?
If yes, complete Form ACM-MP-2. Use of NCDOT Best Management Practices and Erosion
Control Measures
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Heavy highway construction equipment including crane,
excavator, and dump trucks.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
1/30/2023
Dale
B-5610
Project Name
Jason Dilday
Applicant Nam
Applicant Si 1<
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes NNo
If yes, explain steps that will betaken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC
'.2-e08-?808 :. I-II88.3,gCOAST :: www.w o _ .,na,.....;• ni o l!' :,•is tl l I I

Submitted 2/28/2023
r
14ighWay North Carolina Department of Transportation
StoriY watcri Highway Stormwater Program i t
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN '�
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 45565.1.1 TIP No.: B-5610 Coun (ie!.): Dare Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
45565.1.1 ITIP
Number: B-5610
Project Type: Bride Replacement
Date: 11/7/2022
NCDOT Contact:
Kristy Alford, P.E.
Contractor / Desi ner:
Josh Dalton, P.E.
Address:
NCDOT Structures Management Unit
1581 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Address:
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone:
919-707-6531
Phone:
919-859-2243
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
'dalton sun atedesi n.com
Ci ITown:
Hatteras
Count ies :
Dare
River Basins :
Pas uotank
CAMA County?
Yes
Wetlands within Project Limits? I
Yes
Pro ect Des cri lion
Project Length lin. miles or feet :
0.16 Surroundin Land Use: Residential, Commercial
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
1.1 ac.
1.1 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
One paved 11' lane in each direction with 4' paved shoulders and variable with paved
swales.
One paved 15' lane in each direction with 2'-6" curb and gutter.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (vehlhr/day):
Design/Future: 5842 Year: 2042
Existing: 4,425 Year: 2022
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
B-5610 is a bridge replacement project that involves removing Dare County bridge #8, on NC 12 over Slash Creek, and replacing it with a 1 @45' and 1 @50' 21" Cored Slab
bridge with 4' end bent caps. The existing bridge is 5@17' timber deck on timber piles with timber abutments. The proposed structure will not have deck drains, and existing
drainage patterns have been maintained.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body 1 : Slash Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
30-22-30-1
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class SA
Supplemental Classification:
High Quality Waters HQW
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
IYes,
IDeck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
INo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
RECEIVE;)
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC

c
i$$M&H m
❑
r
m r S r
0 0 $
� S ¢
¢ �mm
cciiocros
SpLY@P-pO-
6aQ(�VVV
❑❑f6❑❑
rr
C m
p qb0
o p o0
c -n o
r ? o
— fu o
W
e r Z p n
N y p N
00 E p a
= N p n
I
m p N
C to T
—� p
rn a E Co co L O o p
IL
C4 a
v o o m
m mm2, m
FE �.00om E
g moo �
�£E
O
D❑ ❑ ❑❑ O
r
r �
o = 8 -
$ c = o
elm
@
m�=oo�5
ro
€9,9
0 n0
}Qp ❑ ❑
u7
ti
Er
p
-o p
-n
_ S
cof1J
N m pp
s00 p
= N p
U)
t yCCO
NO
_C) p
E co
O
�� z r3
T = p
N
3c m
u�
7
m
g
fu c
ru
c
m p
m
p
p
w C] 2
E n
p
y p n
5 v%
�m
rl r
Z p a
P
M1 E
C u
q

8/30/213, 10:08 AM
B-5610 ARPO items
Mail - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Dilday, Jason L <jldilday1 @ncdot.gov>
Fri 7/7/2023 9:08 AM
To:Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
b 3 attachments (2 MB)
b5610_mailrcpLpdf, utilmailrcpt.pdf, Palmetiecpdf,
Greg,
Attached are the mail receipts for the project. I will place the one greencard I have in the mail when I'm back in the office. I'll also let you
know about the guardrail and ROW status once I get an answer.
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
jl ildaY1@-ad-g—tgov
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
1 r
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Faceboo Twitter YouTube
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.comtmail/id/AAQkADhiNTQzMTU4LTM4ZjUtNDkOZC05NTCyLWFiZTlyMGJiNmVjMwAQADGQLUCKgOt5icEZ9KHc7xU%3D 1/1

Ir
r�
0
0
azt—
ru
C3
t]
0
0
C3
CO
—a
0
rzi
ccl
r�-
0
❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $
❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $
❑ Adult Signature Required $
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $
Palmatier LLC
P.O. Box 580
Hatteras, NC 27943
Tracking Number.
70180680000024600796
F0 Copy V Add to Informed Delivery
Latest Update
Your Item was picked up at the post office at 3:38 pm on March
15, 2023 in HATrERAS, NC 27943.
Postmark
Here
C Delivered
Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office
HATfERAS, NC 27943
March 15. 2023. 3:38 pm
See All Tracking History
IGet More Out of USPS Tracking:
Q USPS Tracking Plus
Text & Email Updates V
USPS Tracking Plus® V
Precinct lnrnrmnfinn v
Remove X

U.S. Postal Service"'
ru
0
O
.o
ru
fU
Cl
O
0
0
O
Co
A
0
CO
ra
0
171
Darrell A & Lorna S
o- •e
m
0 F F I C I A L
-0Cerflfled Mel Fee
rUa
N 93Rm SeMees Fees ro-McNboe, eddM uappograly
❑Relum gecNPtl>rvdWP✓/ f
O ❑RelunR pttaeo " i
O pcednm Mall gealrkted Detivary f
O ❑aean &sa.wre geglnred S-
r] ❑Mun 81•IeNro geohbleO oelN«y!
O Peslep°
ra
o T°" Oden, Jeffrey L & Kathleen R
s ,a P.O. Box 374
seen
rq Hatteras NC 27943
C3 SY eeF
tti
Postmark
Hors
Ir ..
Cc
M1
OFFICIAL
rflfled Mail Fee
ftl ❑Reha ces ees(cn sor ed Asas*P,-A'mny
mgeroNl fardaap� !
O ❑Reb9n Paaeipl (elaotmnle) !
0 ❑CMMeCMe IgMMNne ery s
O pedanap anae Reaa9.e f
o padansgswre gsu¢tes lMNay!
O Postage
cc, oee
C3L—Hatteras Village Medical Assoc.
Sent P.O. Box 1000
1-1Manteo, NC 27954
_p
r. •
0F
I 9AL '..
Certified Mall Fee
s
rU
rl.l
EXUa SON a ee9 (dreckbw, etld M ee eppraPPrieN
❑gNwn geceipt PsbeopA
$
�
❑Hetum Receipt (eeae°nb)
!
O
pCerana9 Mall ReanbleE DalNery s
❑MNt 61AeaNre Re9aUetl
f
C3
ponun Slgwture geaVicled gelWary 6
O
Postage
co
-0
0
P°I
Palmatier LLC
CO
senrTb
P.O. Box 580
o
Hatteras, NC 27943
171
Po*n•rk
Hero
PoslmsM
Hero

a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 1. 2023
Palmatier LLC
P.O. Box 580
Hatteras, NC 27943
Dear Landowner:
J. ERR: BoYETTE
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace Bridge No. 8 over Slash Creek
on NC 12 in Hatteras, Dare County. This project was redesigned to address concerns in the project
vicinity. The project involves replacement of the existing 86-foot, 5-span bridge and approaches with a
new 95-foot, 2-span bridge. This project crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and must be approved by the DCM under
provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval is that
adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. A permit application,
vicinity map and site drawings are enclosed for your review. This package replaces the previous package
sent in March 2022.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the proposal. The
work planned is depicted in the attached drawing. If you have no objections to the proposal, please return
the form with your response within 10 days to this office. If you do have objections to the project, please
forward your comments to:
Mr. Greg Daisey
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincer-1
Jaso Dilday, Environment I o dinator
Environmental Analysis Um
Enclosures
cc: Greg Daisey, NCDCM
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENVINONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Telephone:[phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-3684968
Webstle: w .ncdotgov
MAR 3 0 2023
DCM „a.rmC�
Location.:
RALEIGH NC 27610

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Dare County: Replacement of Bridge 8 over Slash Creek on NC 12)
NCDOT TIP B-5610
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management Major Permit approval procedures require that
riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed development in an Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC) be given thirty (30) days in which to comment on the proposed development. This form allows the
adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/her objects to the project; or, (2) that he/her does
not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 30-day period so that the processing of the application
can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if
he/she so chooses.
t_ mAKK V .' ` AAr 1 i s r- am an arliarent rinarian nrn eP n,unP, and am aware of tha Mnr h
Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for replacement of Bridge 8 over Slash Creek on NC12. I
am further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of Environmental Concern and therefore
will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of
objection as provided in General Statute 113-229
—LZI have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner
q)D - 6 P - 37310
Phone Number with Area Code
-5 3
Date
IN. r-- - 1 , fi 5v L-_- i....✓
MAR 3 0 2023

Mr. Daisey,
My name is Mark Palmatier, I own the old channel Bass property next to the slash creek bridge
NCDOT has plans to replace. I purchased this historical property for my family and I to build
another seafood restaurant there where the old channel bass stood since the 50's, It was one
of the first restaurants on Hatteras island . As you can imagine people in Hatteras like to stay
with the local landscape and traditions of Hatteras village, that's why I love this place . The
original plans impacted my property and Jeff Odens more than anyone else, the DOT went
back and revised the plans. I met with the dot appraiser Robert Chadwick, Mr. Chadwick and
myself didn't think the new plans where gonna effect future restaurant. I was under the
impression I could still use parking on side of HWY 12 for to go orders, I just could not build
any structure over DUE area, now looking at the new plans it is going to impact me. The
embankment and new guardrail will be in front of the existing parking places there , there will
be no parking there. I will lose all this property, only access to my property and restaurant will
be Island Club Lane . Another issue with the proposed new bridge is run off, right now we do
not have any problem with flooding , I know there are plans to put in drainage but if drains
aren't maintained it's useless. There is a DOT drain in front of the post office that never drains
because it's not maintained and that area has standing water with flooding and storms. Mr.
Daisey I don't understand why DOT cannot rebuild this bridge as it is now and not effect
anyone in the village , a lot of people have asked this same question. We have a bridge that is
over 60 years old and still in service , something was done right , I just wanted to write this
letter to be on record about my feelings about this project . I moved here from Leland NC to get
away from progress but I guess it follows us everywhere including this beautiful island.
Sincerely,
Mark Palmatier
MAR 3 0 2023
DM -EC

Daisey, Greg
From: Dilday, Jason L <jldilday1 @ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 11:13 AM
To: Daisey, Greg
Cc: Williams, Paul C; Turchy, Michael A
Subject: RE: B-5610 utility relocation
Greg,
Here is an update on the issues concerning the replacement of Bridge 8 over the Slash in Hatteras:
-The utilities will not be able to be moved prior to Memorial Day due to right of way issues that have yet to be
resolved. It would be good to go ahead and get the permit for the utility relocation prior to the bridge Letting, as to not
cut into the time of the bridge replacement. It was noted that a section of the sidewalk that was installed will need to
be removed to allow the boring of the water line under the Slash.
-As for the sidewalk, it is not shown on the current set of drawings, but is being added. The sidewalk that Hatteras has
installed is in conflict with the design of the new bridge. NCDOT will remove the sidewalk and replace it with the
sidewalk that was shown in our design. It is unclear why Hatteras installed sidewalk at this location. They were made
aware of DOT's intent to include sidewalk with the bridge replacement as far back as 2018.
-it has been determined that creekside access to Slash Creek at the Hatteras Village Medical Center will still be
available. DOT's current design shows riprap along the "beach" area at this site. The rip rap will not cover the entirety
of the "beach". Also, there is an additional —50 ft of non-bulkheaded shoreline between DOT's proposed riprap and the
remnants of bulkhead on this property allowing for ample space for the launching of kayaks and other small
watercraft. The "parking area" that was used will no longer be available after construction of the new bridge. Thiis area
will have guardrail and curb/gutter installed.
-DOT has determined that the access Mr. Oden references to access his backyard is not an approved driveway to access
NC12. This area, once constructed, will have guardrail and curb/gutter installed.
-Drop inlets in vicinity of Mr. Oden's property and along Islington Court had been redesigned to address Mr. Oden's
previous objections to the project. Originally there were 4 inlets proposed. To address Mr. Oden's objection while still
accomplishing the needed stormwater drainage, these were reduced to 2 inlets. As for Mr. Oden's concern that the
inlets will increase flooding on his property, there is no evidence to substantiate this claim. If water from excessive high
tides or storm surge pushed up into these inlets, the entire area would already be inundated. If anything, these inlets
would help to drain the areas faster.
This project went through a redesign to address objections primarily by Mr. Oden. NCDOT believes it has addressed his
concerns to its most practicable extent while trying to insure that the project is constructed as a safe and resilient
structure along a major arterial for the overall public.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation

919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
[e-mail]
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
y r
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube
From: Dilday, Jason L
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 11:31 AM
To: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Cc: Williams, Paul C <pcwiIlia [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: B-5610 utility relocation
Greg,
I've checked with utilities and they've informed me that the overhead lines could be moved without conflict with the
sidewalk, but the water line would need to remove and replace the sidewalk as it is designed. We have a meeting about
this project on Thursday to discuss the issues that have arisen. Hopefully I will have some answers for you after that.
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
[e-mail]
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, INC 27610
rltr.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube

From: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 9:56 AM
To: Dilday, Jason L<[e-mail]>
Cc: Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: B-5610 utility relocation
Jason -
Good morning,
Have you been able to confirm that the utility relocation can be made without impacting the existing sidewalk located
within the project limits?
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg, DaiseyCaancdenr.00v
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 10:58 AM
To: Daisey, Greg <Gree.Daisev@ncdenr.¢ov>
Cc: Williams, Paul C <pcwilliams20ncdot.eov>; Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: B-5610 utility relocation
Greg,
The drawings you currently have do not reflect the current sidewalk on the project. We were just recently made aware
if its installation. I would assume that the utility relocation can be made without impacting the sidewalk, but I will check.

Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
[e-mail]
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
,;a
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube
From: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 9:43 AM
To: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>; Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: B-5610 utility relocation
Jason -
After my initial review of the general permit application related to utilities relocation in the vicinity of
the proposed B-5610 project, please provide additional information on the following:
1. On permit drawing sheet drawing 2 of 5 the shading for asphalt shoulder and concrete
sidewalk is the same. Is the concrete sidewalk that currently exists at the project site and
within the project limits accurately depicted on the provided drawings and is there any
disturbance/removal of the existing concrete sidewalk associated with the utility relocation
project? The sidewalk was recently installed through a CAMA Major Permit processed by the
Elizabeth City DCM office with Dare County as the applicant. Finally, if there is any disturbance
and/or removal of the existing sidewalk, has NCDOT coordinated the proposal with Dare
County?
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality

252.955.4191
Greg.Daisey( ncdenr.gov
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 11:13 AM
To: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Cc: Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>; Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>
Subject: B-5610 utility relocation
Greg,
I placed in the mail Thursday the application for relocation of utilities associated with the future replacement of Bridge 8
in Hatteras. In the mailed package I included the greencards we had received with the initial bridge replacement
proposal that included the utility design. No objection was received for the Daniels property or the medical center
property. The Oden greencard is included, however they objected to the bridge proposal. Attached is copy of the
Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification/Waiver from Mr. Oden for the proposed utility relocation. Paul Williams
met with Mr. Oden last week where he agreed that he had no objection for the utility work. I have not received the
greencard back from the Palmetier property. I have notice that he picked his package up from the Post Office on March
15'. 1 believe Paul met with the individual around that time and he did not convey any objections to him at that
time. He apparently does not live in the area. Regardless, he has been in receipt of the proposal for 19 days as of
now. NCDOT believe it has fulfilled its obligation to notify the riparian landowners in association with the proposed
relocation of utilities along US 12 at Slash Creek. This proposed work will not result in impacts to jurisdictional features
identified with the study area. NCDOT requests issuance of a General Permit 1600 for the proposed work. Please find
the attached application. As stated earlier, a hard copy is in the mail as well.
Thank you,
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
[e-mail]
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)

Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

6/20/23, 9:58 AM
Mail - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
RE: B-5610 project request for additional information
Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Fri 6/2/2023 11:05 AM
To:Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
CcTurchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>;Williams, Paul C <pcwiIlia [e-mail]>
1 1 attachments (2 MB)
B-5610_Permit Drawing 20230531.pdf;
Greg,
Attached are revised drawings pertaining to the additional information that you requested concerning Bridge 8 over The Slash in
Hatteras. Below in red are responses to your inquiries.
The Let for the bridge replacement has moved out to June of 2024, however I would like to continue to move forward with the permit for
the relocation of utilities on the project to allow ample time for this to occur prior to the eventual bridge replacement.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
jldildayiffl-acdot.gov
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
I
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube
From: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:48 PM
To: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>
Subject: B-5610 project request for additional information
Jason -
DCM has had some continued discussion regarding the current /post project usage of the unimproved beach area and adjacent
to Dare County Bridge No. 8 in Hatteras, Dare County and how the area will look/be able to be utilized post project. DCM
requests additional information and/or clarification that might not be contained in the information that has already been
received. If NCDOT has already provided any requests within this email, it might be beneficial to expand on previously
submitted information for better clarification.
• In the NCDOT email dated 04/14/2023 to DCM it is stated "It has been determined that creekside access to Slash Creek
at the Hatteras Village Medical Center will still be available. DOT's current design shows riprap along the "beach" area
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhiNTQzMTU4LTM4ZjUtN DkOZC05NTcyLW FiZTlyMGJiNmVjMwAQAFUU3kglbOdKgAnoAN PjQFI%3D/sx... 1/3

6/20123, 9:58 AM
Mail - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
at this site. The rip rap will not cover the entirety of the "beach". Also, there is an additional —50 ft of non-bulkheaded
shoreline between DDT's proposed riprap and the remnants of bulkhead on this property allowing for ample space for the
launching of kayaks and other small watercraft. The "parking area" that was used will no longer be available after
construction of the new bridge. This area will have guardrail and curb/gutter installed."
o DCM requests that the additional information be added to Sheet 4 of 6 contained within the submitted drawings
include more detailed information as related to the beach area. It would be beneficial for the drawings to include a
call out that shows the stated 50' of non -bulk headed shoreline between NCDOT's proposed rip rap and the
remnant bulkhead on the adjacent property and call out that shows the distance of proposed rip rap that will exist
post project in the existing "beach area".
See attached permit drawings
o DCM requests confirmation that the proposed guardrail and curb/gutter to be installed adjacent to the beach area is
being incorporated into the project to the most minimal extent practicable in relation to NCDOT's purpose/need.
When the bridge was being designed, redesigned and/or design alternatives were being developed, was the use of
sheet pile investigated in order to reduce fill slopes and lessen impacts to the adjacent area in the northwest
quadrant of the proposed bridge replacement?
Sheet piling was never investigated during the design of this project.
o Sheet 4 of 6 contained within the submitted drawings appears to depict stormwater pipe extending out from the
proposed rip rap revetment into areas that are adjacent to what is currently described as the "beach" area. If the
piping does extend out, what is the approximate length of pipe within surface water? Is this pipe intended to be
above or below NWL and if intended to be below NWL will informationaliwarning signage in its approximate
location be included in the proposed bridge replacement project?
See attached periuit drawings. Also, the fine responsible for the penuit drawings stated that the pipe will be
above NWL and extend approximately IOft beyond the bank.
• Comments received by DCM after NCDOT submitted the application for bridge replacement and information supplied to
DCM by NCDOT related to the summary of the November 20, 2022 public information meeting raised concerns by the
public related to the water access adjacent to the bridge.
o DCM requests that NCDOT provide information/narrative on how the current redesign addressed public
comments/concerns related to water access adjacent to the bridge. It would be beneficial to explain how the area
was proposed originally and any differences/changes that have been incorporated into the current redesigned bridge
project post public information meeting.
The redesign efforts lowered the elevation of the proposed bridge thus reducing the limits the proposed rip rap in
the vicinity of the kayak launch.
o During redesign of the bridge replacement project after the public information meeting, was there any continued
coordination between NCDOT and local business owners concerned about water access or Dare County in order to
attempt address providing continued access/parking similar to what is currently existing adjacent to the bridge.
No additional coordination was completed with any local business owners after the public meeting. It was
determined in the Public Comment Response Meeting that coordination with the Kayak Shop would be
completed, but it was put on hold until the final impacts are detennined.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg. [e-mail]
https:lloutlook.office365.com/mail/idlAAQkADhiNTQzMTU4LTM4ZjUtNDkOZCO5NTcyLW FiZTIyMGJiNmVjMwAQAFUU3kglbOdKgAnOANPjQFI%3D/sx... 2/3

6120/23, 9:58 AM Mail - Daisey, Greg -Outlook
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhiNTQzMTU4LTM4ZjUtNDkOZC05NTcyLW FiZTlyMGJiNmVjMwAQAFUU3kglbOdKgAnoAN PjQFI%3D/sx... 3/3

8/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: B-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
RE: B-5610 project request for additional information
Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Mon 7/3/2023 10:14 AM
To:Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
QI 1 attachments (2 MB)
B-5610_Permit Drawing_20230703.pdf;
Greg,
See the attached revised permit drawings showing the location of the proposed guardrail.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
jlf kay1PAd2Lg4Y
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTube
From: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 2:36 PM
To: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>; Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: B-5610 project request for additional information
Jason -
Thanks for the quick response.
The guardrail is being requested by DCM only on drawings associated with the bridge replacement. It is not necessary to be
shown on any drawings related to the utility project. Since there is currently no existing guardrail and guardrail is being
proposed in association with the new bridge replacement, DCM considers it a part of the total project and a new permanent
feature possibly within the 75' estuarine AEC buffer, therefore should be depicted on the drawings.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
about:blank 116

8/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: B-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg.Daisey@raggmggy
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dilday, Jason L <jldildayL@ ot.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 1:34 PM
To: Daisey, Greg <Greg. ais [e-mail],gov>
Cc: Turchy, Michael A < urchy@nc o ggy>; Williams, Paul C <ncwilliams2@�gLgov>
Subject: RE: B-5610 project request for additional information
Greg,
It may take a little longer than I'd like to get the utility drawings updated. The utility coordinator is out until July loth. I am assuming that
we are referring just to the drawings associated with the utility relocation. The guardrail is not a part of that work. Is it necessary to
show the proposed guardrail on these drawings? That guardrail will not be installed until the bridge replacement occurs and with the
issues we've been dealing with on the bridge replacement, there is a possibility that some change may occur to its installation by the time
the bridge comes along.
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
jldi ayl@LLJ;lj�gg-v
1598 Mall Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
> M
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter YouTu e
From: Dilday, Jason L
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 20231:12 PM
To: Daisey, Greg <aMg Daisey@deq cc.gov>
Subject: RE: B-5610 project request for additional information
about:blank 2/6

-3/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: B-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Greg,
I'll see what I can get done and get the drawings back to you as quick as possible. I think this happened due to these drawings being done
by our utilities unit, instead of structures management. They were probably working off an older version or incomplete drawings.
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
jldi1I ay1 ncdot,gov
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter Your be
From: Daisey, Greg <Grgg Daiseyna deacgov>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 1:08 PM
To: Dilday, Jason L <jldilday @aJ;dot.gov>
Subject: Re: B-5610 project request for additional information
Jason -
Appreciate you reaching out to me today related the voicemail that I left prior to your vacation.
I was reaching out to request that if the guardrails located on the approaches associated with the new bridge structure are
not shown on the submitted drawings, DCM requests that they bee added. I think it would be beneficial to show the proposed
guardrails on Permit Drawing Sheet 2 of 6 or Sheet 3 of 6 and Sheet 4 of 6. The whole drawing sheet package would not have
to be resubmitted, just two drawings that shows the proposed locations. This would show how the guardrails interact with the
existing parcels in the immediate bridge quadrants.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg.Dais y�@_deq.nc.gov
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
about:blank 3/6

8/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: B-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dilday, Jason L <jldilday-ncdot.gov_>
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 11:04 AM
To: Daisey, Greg <Greg.Daisey@ eeq.nc.gov>
Cc:Turchy, Michael A <ma ur hy_a r cdot.ggv_>; Williams, Paul C<ocwilliams2C<Jncdot.gpv>
Subject: RE: B-5610 project request for additional information
Greg,
Attached are revised drawings pertaining to the additional information that you requested concerning Bridge 8 over The Slash in
Hatteras. Below in red are responses to your inquiries.
The Let for the bridge replacement has moved out to June of 2024, however I would like to continue to move forward with the permit for
the relocation of utilities on the project to allow ample time for this to occur prior to the eventual bridge replacement.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Jason
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
j [e-mail]1gov
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
Ft�!
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twits ter YouTube
From: Daisey, Greg <_0Leg.D2i5ey@a ncdenngov>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:48 PM
To: Dilday, Jason L <jldilday1@n t.gov>
Cc: Turchy, Michael A < aturc yea ncdot.gov>
Subject: B-5610 project request for additional information
Jason -
DCM has had some continued discussion regarding the current /post project usage of the unimproved beach area and adjacent
to Dare County Bridge No. 8 in Hatteras, Dare County and how the area will look/be able to be utilized post project. DCM
requests additional information and/or clarification that might not be contained in the information that has already been
received. If NCDOT has already provided any requests within this email, it might be beneficial to expand on previously
submitted information for better clarification.
aboubblank 4/6

8/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: 8-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
• In the NCDOT email dated 04/14/2023 to DCM it is stated "It has been determined that creekside access to Slash Creek
at the Hatteras Village Medical Center will still be available. DOT'S current design shows riprap along the "beach" area
at this site. The rip rap will not cover the entirety of the "beach". Also, there is an additional —50 ft of non-bulkheaded
shoreline between DOT'S proposed riprap and the remnants of bulkhead on this property allowing for ample space for the
launching of kayaks and other small watercraft. The "parking area" that was used will no longer be available after
construction of the new bridge. This area will have guardrail and curb/gutter installed."
o DCM requests that the additional information be added to Sheet 4 of 6 contained within the submitted drawings
include more detailed information as related to the beach area. It would be beneficial for the drawings to include a
call out that shows the stated 50' of non -bulk headed shoreline between NCDOT's proposed rip rap and the
remnant bulkhead on the adjacent property and call out that shows the distance of proposed rip rap that will exist
post project in the existing "beach area".
See attached permit drawings
o DCM requests confirmation that the proposed guardrail and curb/gutter to be installed adjacent to the beach area is
being incorporated into the project to the most minimal extent practicable in relation to NCDOT's purpose/need.
When the bridge was being designed, redesigned and/or design alternatives were being developed, was the use of
sheet pile investigated in order to reduce fill slopes and lessen impacts to the adjacent area in the northwest
quadrant of the proposed bridge replacement?
Sheet piling was never investigated during the design of this project.
o Sheet 4 of 6 contained within the submitted drawings appears to depict stormwater pipe extending out from the
proposed rip rap revetment into areas that are adjacent to what is currently described as the "beach" area. If the
piping does extend out, what is the approximate length of pipe within surface water? Is this pipe intended to be
above or below NWL and if intended to be below NWL will informational/warning signage in its approximate
location be included in the proposed bridge replacement project?
See attached permit drawings. Also, the firm responsible for the permit drawings stated that the pipe will be
above NWL and extend approximately IOft beyond the bank.
• Comments received by DCM after NCDOT submitted the application for bridge replacement and information supplied to
DCM by NCDOT related to the summary of the November 20, 2022 public information meeting raised concerns by the
public related to the water access adjacent to the bridge.
o DCM requests that NCDOT provide information/narrative on how the current redesign addressed public
comments/concerns related to water access adjacent to the bridge. It would be beneficial to explain how the area
was proposed originally and any differences/changes that have been incorporated into the current redesigned bridge
project post public information meeting.
The redesign efforts lowered the elevation of the proposed bridge thus reducing the limits the proposed rip rap in
the vicinity of the kayak launch.
o During redesign of the bridge replacement project after the public information meeting, was there any continued
coordination between NCDOT and local business owners concerned about water access or Dare County in order to
attempt address providing continued access/parking similar to what is currently existing adjacent to the bridge.
No additional coordination was completed with any local business owners after the public meeting. It was
determined in the Public Comment Response Meeting that coordination with the Kayak Shop would be
completed, but it was put on hold until the final impacts are determined.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
about:blank 516

8/30/23, 10:56 AM RE: B-5610 project request for additional information - Daisey, Greg -Outlook
(Lr@g2a!a@[e-mail]
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized slate official.
about:blank 616

8/30/23, 11:34 AM [External] SAW-2022-00579 Bridge 8 Slash Creek Dare - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
[External] SAW-2022-00579 Bridge 8 Slash Creek Dare
Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Wed 4/12/2023 9:41 AM
To:Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Cc:Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>;Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
1 attachments.(641 KB)
SAW-2022-00579 NCDOT Bridge B Slash Creek Dare.pdf;
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.
Jason,
Attached is the permit verification for NCDOT to utilize RGP 50 to replace Bridge 8 over Slash Creek in
Hatteras Village in Dare County. Also included is a link for you to download the RGP 50 to provide to any
contractors of this project so they will be familiar with the terms and conditions of that permit. Please
review the information and let me know if you have any questions.
https://saw-re g.usace.army.mil/RGP/RGP50.pdf
Kyle Barnes
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
WRDA/Transportation Permitting Branch
910-251-4584
We at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch are committed to improving service to our
customers. We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey is located at: Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
<BlockedhttP:Hcorpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0>
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
about:blank 1/1

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2022-00579 County: Dare County U.S.G.S. Quad: Hatteras
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Jason Dilday
NCDOT
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 1 Nearest Town Hatteras
Nearest Waterway Pamlico Sound River Basin Pamlico
USGS HUC 03010205 Coordinates Latitude: 35.218255: Longitude:-75.688773
Location description: The project area is located on Bridge #8 over Slash Creek on NC 12
approximately 0.04 miles northwest of the intersection of Islington Court in Hatteras
Village in Dare County, North Carolina
Description of projects area and activity: NCDOT proposes to replace an 86' 5 span bridge
with a 95' 1 span core slab bridge over Slash Creek in Hatteras Village, Dare County.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344);
® Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: RGP 50
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in
strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted application and
attached information dated March 2, 2023 Any violation of the attached conditions or
deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide
and/or regional general permit authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional general permit authorization is
reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the
nationwide and/or regional general permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is
modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the
nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will
remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the
nationwide and/or regional general permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or
revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401
Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone
919-807-6300) to determine Section 401 requirements.

SAW-2022-00579
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of
Coastal Management in Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to
obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the
Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Kyle Barnes at [phone] or
Kyle.W.BarnesCilusace.army.mil.
/ . k 2023.04.12 09:21:07
Corps Regulatory Official: "j-44-�,- -04'00' Date: April 11, 2023
Expiration Date of Verification: May 25, 2025
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To
help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey,
located online at https:Hregulator .00ps.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
Page 2 of 2

SAW-2022-00579
Action Id. SAW-2022-00579
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
County: Dare County
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: NCDOT
Jason Dilday
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 1 Nearest Town Hatteras
Nearest Waterway Pamlico Sound River Basin Pamlico
USGS HUC 03010205 Coordinates Latitude: 35.218255: Longitude:-75.688773
Location description:
Dare County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be
subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands, have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and
reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,
compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision
made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in
any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This
preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an
approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be
subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands, have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and
reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,
compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision
made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in
any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This
preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Page 3 of 2

Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an
approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be
subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since thewaters, including wetlands,
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used it
the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary
determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the
waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to
support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a
consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to
the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described property subject to
the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless
there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property
delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely
manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property have been delineated and the
delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation
surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction or
your property which, unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are
accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on
. Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property
which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in
Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a
Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33
USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or placement of structures, or work
within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may constitute
a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you
have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact
Kyle Barnes at [phone] or Kyle.W.Barnes(a)_usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic
resource boundaries and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean
Water Act for the particular site identified in this request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional
determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the
local USDA service center, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations
at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and
Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a
completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(&USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that
meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division
Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be
received at the above address by N/A
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the
determination in this correspondence.

°ak- 2023.04.12 09:22:52-04'00'
Corps Regulatory Official: M"4-ko—
Date of JD: April 11, 2023 Expiration Date: N/A
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us
ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survpy/.

SAW-2022-00579
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. The NCDOT shall implement the "Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee:
Precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters" as identified by
the USFW Service.
2. The Wilmington District, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) have
conducted programmatic Section 7(a)(2) consultation for the Northern long-eared bat
(NLEB) for NCDOT projects located in Divisions 1-8. The result of this programmatic
consultation is a Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) issued by the USFWS titled,
"Programmatic Biological Opinion — Revised, NCDOT Program Effects on the Northern
Long-eared Bat in Divisions 1-8", dated December 15, 2022. This PBO contains agreed
upon conservation measures which would minimize take of NLEB. As noted in the PBO,
applicability of these conservation measures varies depending on the location of the
project. The USFWS has documented that no reasonable and prudent measures, nor
terms and conditions, are necessary or appropriate to minimize the amount or extent of
incidental take of NLEB caused by the Action; therefore, the incidental take statement
does not provide reasonable and prudent measures for this species. Department of the
Army (DA) authorization under general permit or standard permit (Individual Permit) is
conditional upon the permittee's compliance with applicable, agreed upon conservations
measures of the PBO, which is incorporated by reference in this verification letter.
Failure to comply with the applicable conservation measures, where a take of the NLEB
occurs, would constitute an unauthorized take by the permittee, and would also
constitute permittee non-compliance with this verification letter. The USFWS is the
appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of its PBO
and the ESA. All PBOs can be found on our website at:
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-
Coordination/ESA/.

Action ID Number: SAW-2022-00579 County: Dare County
Permittee: Jason Dilday
NCDOT
Project Name: NCDOT / B-5610 / Bridge 8 over Slash Creek on NC 12 / Dare County / Div. 1
Date Verification Issued: April 11, 2023
Project Manager: Kyle Barnes
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the
permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Kyle Barnes
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this
authorization may result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization
and/or issuing a Class I administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed
in accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Jason Dilday NCDOT
File Number: SAW-2022-00579 Date: April 11 2023
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www usace army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ulatoryProgramandPennits ash or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Kyle Barnes
CESAD-PDO
2407 West 5" Street
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 27889
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP A SHANNIN(a�USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Kyle Barnes, 2407 West 51h Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room HIM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN USACE.ARMY.MIL

8/30/26, 11:31 AM RE: Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (B-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2, Approval Letter - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
RE: Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (B-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2, Approval Letter
Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Tue 4/18/2023 9:30 AM
To:Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Cc:Barnes, Kyle W SAW <[e-mail]>
Greg,
I wasn't aware that there were still issues with the property owners regarding stormwater. I thought the revised application had
addressed those concerns.
We wouldn't see anywhere near this amount of DI's and piping for a typical bridge replacement on a SR route but it's not unusual to see
in a more urban setting like this one. The direct pipe to stream discharge of stormwater isn't something we like to see but given the
amount of BUA there were not any good options for treatment. I had several discussions with DOT regarding this with the first
application last year. We don't typically allow deck drains on smaller bridges but sheetflow of stormwater off the road shoulder is
preferred to ditches/pipes if the grade allows and there is a good opportunity for vegetated treatment. In this case there were limited
opportunities even for that.
Garcy Ward
Environmental Specialist, Transportation Permitting Branch
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone]
gf7S.Y, LgLd@MQdgm got`
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Daisey, Greg <Greg.Daisey@ncdenrgov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 2:44 PIV
To: Ward, Garcy<[e-mail]>
Cc: Barnes, Kyle W SAW <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fw: Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (B-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2, Approval Letter
Garcy -
DCM has received some feedback from adjacent property owners in the vicinity of the proposed replacement of Dare County
Bridge No. 8 over Slash Creek in Hatteras on the plans submitted by NCDOT.
It seems that there is belief among some of the property owners that the proposed stormwater collection system might be
more robust than what they think might be necessary when you take into account the elevations in around the project site
and the current existing stormwater situation. The property owner on the northwest quadrant is stating that
stormwater/flooding coming off the bridge/roadway has never been an issue (meaning that whatever comes off of the
bridge/roadway naturally makes it's way to Slash Creek), but that wind driven flooding from down Islington Ct./Slash Creek is a
more typical problem and that the proposed drop inlets are at a higher elevation than what would alleviate any of the wind
driven accumulation of water.
I have a couple questions you might be able to address:
• Is the proposed amount of catch basins, drop inlets, and stormwater piping typically what you see on bridge projects of
this size and with similar elevations of the surrounding area?
• Is there a situation(s) in relation to similar projects that the piping of stormwater would be seen as non -preferable over
existing current stormwater components, or lack there of .... meaning stormwater just sheeting off of the roadway into
the adjacent Right -of -Way and/or into deck drains located on a bridge and then into surface water.
Thanks for your time.
Greg Daisey
about:blank 1/3

8/30123, 11:31 AM - RE: Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (B-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2, Approval Letter - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg.Daisey ncdenr.gov
401 South Grim Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Carpenter,Kristi <kristilynn.carpenter ncdenr.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 6:52 PM
To: Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>; Barnes, Kyle W SAW <[e-mail] mil>; Dilday, Jason L
<[e-mail]>; Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>; Britdngham, Cathy <cathy.brittingham@ncdenrgov>; Ward, Garcy
<garcy.ward@nc en gov>
Subject: Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (8-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2, Approval Letter
All,
This email is being sent to you because you have been identified as an electronic copy recipient of the subject document. If you have any
questions about this email or the attached document, please contact Garcy Ward at gam war @n nr gov.
If you have General Certification questions please use the following link to access the site map for General Certifications on our Website:
Upsjdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/­water-resources/water-q alityzaermitting/401-buffer-permitting-branch gener .
Sincerely,
Kristi Lynn Carpenter
Kristi Lynn Carpenter
Administrative Assistant
401 R Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
919.707.3872 office
k[L,[e-mail]
512 N Salisbury Street, 12th Floor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has adjusted operations to
protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or are on staggered shifts. To accommodate
these staffing changes, all DEQoffice locations are limiting public access to appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff
before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to
serve the public during this challenging time.
aboutblank 2/3

DocuSign Envelope ID: FCBODDFO-3972-4529-8A37-C263180754Fc
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 10, 2023
Dare County
NCDWR Project No. 20220400 v.2
TIP B-5610
Bridge No. 8
APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Michael Turchy
Environmental Coordination and Permitting
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Turchy:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
replacing Bridge No. 8 over the Slash on NC 12 in Dare County:
Open Water Impacts in the Pasquotank River Basin
Open Water
Open Water
Site
Permanent
Temporary
ac
ac
Brid e 8
0.03
0.08
Total
0.11
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your revised application dated received March 3, 2023. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number 4135. This certification corresponds to the Regional General Permit 201902350 issued by the Corps of
Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the NCDWR and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter,and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification(s) and any additional conditions listed below.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules,
regulations, or ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and
sedimentation control requirements, etc.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
51.2 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
V _ 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope 10: FCBODDFO-3972-4529-8A37-C263180754FF
2. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit drawings submitted
for approval. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
3. Adherence to The Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee: Precautionary Measures for
Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters will be required throughout construction.
4. If activities must occur during periods of high biological activity (e.g. sea turtle nesting, fish spawning, or bird
nesting), then biological monitoring may be required at the request of other state or federal agencies and coordinated
with these activities. All moratoriums on construction activities established by the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (WRC), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), NC Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF), or National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) shall be implemented. Exceptions to this condition require written approval by
the resource agency responsible for the given moratorium.
5. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this
authorization, including all non-commercial borrow and waste sites associated with the project, shall be clearly
marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the fencing are
prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0501 and .0502]
6. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S.,
or protected riparian buffers. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
7. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. [15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(3)]
8. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this
certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
9. When applicable, all construction activities shall be performed and maintained in full compliance with G.S.
Chapter 113A Article 4 (Sediment and Pollution Control Act of 1973). Regardless of applicability of the
Sediment and Pollution Control Act, all projects shall incorporate appropriate Best Management Practices for
the control of sediment and erosion so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3) and 15A NCAC 02B.02001
a. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of all sediment and erosion control measures shall be
equal to or exceed the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment
and Erosion Control Manual, or for linear transportation projects, the NCDOT Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual.
b. All devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. Sufficient materials
required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and
treatment shall be on site at all times.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures shall be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining
Manual. Reclamation measures and implementation shall comply with the reclamation in accordance
with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the Mining Act of 1971.
d. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas (PNAs), SA, WS-1,
WS-11, High Quality Waters (HQW), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), then the sedimentation
and erosion control designs shall comply with the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 04B .0124,
Design Standards in Sensitive Watershed. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3); GC 4135]
10. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or surface waters or within 5 feet of the
top of bank without prior approval from DWR. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
11. Erosion control matting in riparian areas shall not contain a plastic or nylon mesh grid which can impinge and
entrap small animals. Matting should be secured in place by staples, stakes, or wherever possible live stakes of
native trees. Riparian areas are defined as a distance 25 feet from top of stream bank. [15A NCAC 0213.02011
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: FCBODDFO-3972-4529-8A37-C263180754FF
12. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, then design and
placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands, stream beds, or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above
structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed from wetlands and waters and the
natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Energy, Mining and Land
Resources (DEMLR) or locally delegated program has released the specific area within the project. [I5A
NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
13. As a condition of this 401 Water Quality Certification, the bridge demolition and construction must be
accomplished in strict compliance with the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices for
Construction and Maintenance Activities. [I5A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)]
14. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the bridge
and pre-treated through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre -formed scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.)
where possible before entering the stream. To meet the requirements of NCDOT's NPDES permit
NCS0000250, please refer to the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater Best Management Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2)
and 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)]
15. All bridge construction shall be performed from the existing bridge, temporary work bridges, temporary
causeways, or floating or sunken barges. If work conditions require barges, they shall be floated into position
and then sunk. The barges shall not be sunk and then dragged into position. Under no circumstances should
barges be dragged along the bottom of the surface water. [I5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3))
16. Bridge piles and bents shall be constructed using driven piles (hammer or vibratory) or drilled shaft
construction methods. More specifically, jetting or other methods of pile driving are prohibited without prior
written approval from the NCDWR first. [I5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
17. The use of rip -rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip -rap placed for stream
stabilization shall be placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage.
[I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
18. No drill slurry or water that has been in contact with uncured concrete shall be allowed to enter surface waters.
This water shall be captured, treated, and disposed of properly. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)]
19. A turbidity curtain will be installed in the stream if driving or drilling activities occur within the stream
channel, on the stream bank, or within 5 feet of the top of bank, or during the removal of bents from an old
bridge. This condition can be waived with prior approval from the NCDWR. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)]
20. Native riparian vegetation must be reestablished in the riparian areas within the construction limits of the
project by the end of the growing season following completion of construction. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
21. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters
is prohibited. [I5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
22. NCDOT shall be in compliance with the NCS00250 issued to the NCDOT, including the applicable requirements
of the NCGO1000.
23. The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any
other appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If the NCDWR determines that such standards or laws
are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being
violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the NCDWR may reevaluate and modify
this certification. [15A NCAC 02B.0200]
24. The Permittee shall report any violations of this certification to the Division of Water Resources within 24 hours
of discovery. [I5A NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
D
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
.,,; .,.�s+
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: FCBODDFO-3972-4529-8A37-C263180754FF
25. The NCDOT will conduct a pre -construction meeting with all appropriate staff to ensure that the project supervisor
and essential staff understand the permit conditions and any potential issues at the permitted site. NCDWR staff
shall be invited to the pre -construction meeting. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2) and (b)(3)]
26. Upon completion of the project (including any impacts at associated borrow or waste sites), the NCDOT Division
Engineer shall complete the "Certification of Completion Form" to notify the NCDWR when all work included in
the 401 Certification has been completed. (I5A NCAC 02H.0502(f)]
27. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be maintained on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer
and the on -site project manager. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administmtive hearings. You must file the petition
with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered
filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except
for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Garcy Ward at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sine elttbd by:
C12MD474
Richard E. Rogers, Jr., Director
Division of Water Resources
Electronic copy only distribution:
Kyle Barnes, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Jason Dilday, NCDOT
Greg Daisey, NC Division of Coastal Management
Cathy Brittingham, NC Division of Coastal Mangement
Garcy Ward, NC Division of Water Resources, Washington Regional Office
File Copy
�D North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
"'a 919.707.9000

8/30/23, 11:39 AM
Mail - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Proposed Replacement of Dare County Bridge No. 8 in Hatteras
Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Thu 5/4/2023 2:29 PM
To:[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
§ 1 attachments (3 MB)
Unimproved Access to The Slash.png;
Good afternoon,
I'm processing a CAMA permit application submitted to DCM by NCDOT related to the proposed replacement Dare County
Bridge No. 8 on NC Highway 12 in Hatteras. Comments received by DCM after NCDOT submitted the application for bridge
replacement and information supplied to DCM by NCDOT related to the summary of a November 20, 2022 public information
meeting hosted by NCDOT in Hatteras Village raised concerns by the public related to the water access adjacent to the bridge.
The access area is located between the Hatteras Village Medical Center property (57635 NC Highway 12, Hatteras) and Dare
County Bridge No. 8 (that carries NC Highway 12 over The Slash). Please see attached aerial for exact location
In a NCDOT email sent to DCM dated 04/14/2023 it is stated "It has been determined that creekside access to Slash Creek at
the Hatteras Village Medical Center will still be available. DOT'S current design shows riprap along the "beach" area at this
site. The rip rap will not cover the entirety of the "beach". Also, there is an additional —50 ft of non-bulkheaded shoreline
between DOT'S proposed riprap and the remnants of bulkhead on this property allowing for ample space for the launching of
kayaks and other small watercraft. The "parking area" that was used will no longer be available after construction of the new
bridge. This area will have guardrail and curb/gutter installed."
I did a brief review of the Dare County CAMA LUP, and found that there are policies related to the public's right to access and
use the public trust areas and waters. DCM did receive acknowledgment as a property owner (returned Green Card as a
Riparian Adjacent Property Owner) from Dare County, but I wanted to inquire if NCDOT and Dare County has had any
discussion/coordination on the "beach" access area and how it might look and/or function post bridge replacement project.
Additionally, has Dare County been contacted by property owners or has there been any coordination/communication between
concerned property owners and Dare County related to water access issues in conjunction with the proposed bridge
replacement project?
Any information you may be able to provide will help me continue to process the permit application and in my ongoing
coordination with NCDOT. Thanks for your time.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg.Daisey ncdenr.ggy
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
https:lloutlook.o(fice365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhiNTQzMTU4LTM4ZjUtNDkOZC05NTcyLWFiZTIyMGJiNmVjMwAQANQHeHlh%2FWNCvoECHDofiYs%u3D 1/1

8130123, 11:18 AM Fw: B-5610 project - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Fw: B-5610 project
Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Thu 4/20/2023 10:33 AM
To:Bodnar, Gregg<[e-mail]>;Brittingham, Cathy<[e-mail]>;Lane, Stephen
<ste phen.lane@ n cden r.gov>
QI 3 attachments (2 MB)
B-5610 Public Comment Responses 01.20.2023.pdf; B-5610 Sign in.pdf; RE_ Replace Bridge 8 on NC 12 over The Slash (B-5610), DWR 20220400 Version 2,
Approval Letteceml;
I reached out to NCDOT related to the informational meeting held in Hatteras related to the proposed replacement
of Dare County Bridge No. 8 (B-5610).
Jason was able to provide a pretty detailed response on the comments received and states "redesign happened in
conjunction with the public meeting to make sure that comments had been heard and addressed as appropriate".
I'm going to further review, but at this time it does not seem that I have received any new concerns from residents
triggered by the resubmitted application in March 2023. All concerns that I am aware of seemed to be directly
stated in the informational meeting/comment process and NCDOT is stating that they have "addressed as
appropriate".
Please see previous email and attachments (2 pdf's) related to NCDOT's response to my inquiry about the
meeting/response. I've also attached (email file) the response I received from DWR related my inquiry about the
stormwater design associated with the bridge replacement.
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
Greg,[e-mail]
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:39 AM
To: Daisey, Greg <[e-mail]>
Cc: Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>; Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: B-5610 project
Greg,
You are correct in that typically on a project this size, we don't have this level of public involvement. You will recall that we attempted to
permit this replacement last year, with a larger than typical showing from the public with concerns about the project. Most of these
comments originated from the ARLO packages that were sent out prior to the CAMA application submittal. Comments were coming in
from the adjacent landowners as well as the general public. This resulted in the current re -design that attempted to address legitimate
concerns about the project. This redesign happened in conjunction with the public meetingto make sure that comments had been heard
and addressed as appropriate.
Attached is a summary of the 11/20/2022 meeting as well as the sign in sheet for the event. Outside of a project initiation letter in 2016
and a project newsletter in 2019, 1 am not aware of any other public interactions.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Jason
about talank 113

8/30/23, 11:18 AM
Fw: B-5610 project - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
Jason L Dilday
ECAP Eastern Regional Team Lead
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6111 office
252 209 6570 mobile
j diI �daY3@@-2Lg9Y
1598 Mail Service Center (Mail)
Raleigh, INC 27699-1598
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
Raleigh, NC 27610
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter oY uTube
From: Daisey, Greg <Greg.Dalsey@ncdencgov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:17 AM
To: Dilday, Jason L <[e-mail]>
Subject: B-5610 project
Jason -
The referenced article below was brought to the attention of DCM:
Details provided on Slash Creek bridge replacement Published 8:54 am Thursday, December 8, 2022
Read more at: ht,l ps•//www.thecoastiandtimes.com/2022/12/08/details-provided-on-slash-creek-bridge-replacement/
Details pmyiddd
on Slash Creek
bridge
Le
placement - The
Coastland Times
In Hatteras village, Slash
Creek Bridge No. 8 is due
to be replaced by the
North Carolina
Department of
www.thecoastl andti m es.com
11
From the article: "For an online version of the Public Meeting Map and information from the November meeting, go to
publicinput.com/v7673. The deadline for comments was Nov. 24, 2022, however the comment page is still open as of Friday
afternoon, December 2."
aboukblank 213

8/30/23, 11:18 AM
Fw: B-5610 project - Daisey, Greg - Outlook
During my past work with bridge replacements of this size, the public information meeting seems non -typical. Would NCDOT
be able to provide a summary of the comments received by NCDOT? How many comments were received and what type of
issues were involved with the submitted comments? Did NCDOT have further correspondence/communication with residents
that submitted comments? The article seems to reference a November loth meeting, did NCDOT conduct any subsequent
meeting(s) after comments had been received and specifically how many meetings in total occurred?
Greg Daisey
Transportation Projects Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.955.4191
CLreg.Daisey cdenrggy
401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
about:blank
3/3

STEWART
B-5610 Public Comment Response Summary
The information in this document contains public comments received during public involvement for the B-5610
project in Dare County, NCDOT Division 1. The public comment period was from November 10, 2022 to
November 24, 2022. Comments were provided via the public website, in -person at the November 10, 2022
public meeting, via email and/or phone number. As of January 20, 2023, the combined project website statistics
are as follows:
Website LIRL:
https://www.publicinput.com/NC12-BridgeReplacement-
Dare
Project Email:
[e-mail]
Project Phone g:
984-205-6615 (Project Code: 2301)
Meeting Date:
Thursday, November 10, 2022
Meeting Location:
Hatteras Community Building
56658 North Carolina Hwy 12,
Hatteras, NC 27943
Total Public Meeting Attendees:
50
Total Public Meeting Comment Forms Received:
(7 people, 12 comments total)
Total Email Comments Received:
(3 people, 3 emails total)
Total Voicemail Comments Received:
2
Total Website Comments Received:
(4 people, 4 comments total)
Total Responses:
19
The comments have been reviewed and were grouped together based on the applicable topic. The key points,
themes, questions, or concerns have been extracted from the comments received and responses from NCDOT
have been provided to the applicable group of comments.

STEWART
Protect B-5610
Replace Bridge No. 8 over the Slash on N.C. 12 in Dare County.
Question 1: Please share your thoughts on the proposed replacement.
Question 2: Are there questions or comments you would like to provide the team?
Key points, issues, concerns, or questions indicated in public comments for B-5610:
• Concern for potential impacts to the oak trees along N.C. 12.
• Concern regarding right of way impacts due to the addition of sidewalk on both sides of the project.
• Request that no new drainage systems be installed on Islington Court to mitigate right of way impact to
adjacent parcels.
• Concern regarding property impacts on quality of life.
• Concern regarding flooding impacts in the project area after construction.
• Concern regarding flooding on the proposed detour route along Eagle Pass Road.
• Concern regarding impacts to business operations during construction.
• Concern that the bridge design will negatively impact the community's aesthetic character.
• Request that the bridge width be reduced to 33 feet from the current design width of 45.5 feet.
• Request that the bridge be closed to through traffic and turned into a pedestrian bridge while also
shifting project funding to the maintenance of Isabel Inlet.
• Request that construction occur in the winter during the Town's off-season for tourism.
• Question from local business owner asking if the proposed bridge design will remove the current kayak
access to Slash Creek that their business relies upon.
• Question regarding the elevation of the proposed bridge design.

5TEWART
NCDOT response to comments for B-5610:
Themes Addressed:
• Concern for potential impacts to the oak trees along N.C. 12.
• Concern that the bridge design will negatively impact the community's aesthetic character.
NCDOT will avoid and minimize impacts to trees and landscaping as much os feasible during construction.
Preliminary alternatives were developed and evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need for the
project, as well as how they minimize impacts to the human and natural environments. The current detailed
study alternatives were selected based on those evaluations Opportunities to further minimize the impacts to
the human and natural environment will continue to be evaluated durina the refinement of preliminary and final
designs.
Themes Addressed:
• Concern regarding right of way impacts due to the addition of sidewalk on both sides of the project.
• Concern regarding property impacts to quality of life.
NCDOT will continue to make efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to neighborhoods surrounding the project to
the greatest extent practicable during final design and construction If the acquisition of private property is
required NCDOT Right -of -Way and Relocation procedures will be followed As the project design is refined
NCDOT will attempt to minimize the impact to adjacent parcels while balancing the federal and state
requirements for the human and natural environments.
NCDOT is also committed to the statewide Complete Streets Policy, which directs the department to consider and
incorporate several modes of transportation when building new proiects or making improvements to existing
infrastructure The benefits of this approach include making it easier for travelers to get where they need to go
encouraging the use of alternative forms of transportation, building more sustainable communities increasing
connectivity between neighborhoods streets and destinations and improving safety for pedestrians cyclists and
motorists.
Themes Addressed:
• Concern regarding impacts to business operations during construction.
Temporary visual impacts would affect Properties adjacent to areas where construction staging and stockpiling
operations occur. Upon project completion the contractor would be required to remove all equipment and excess

STEWART
materials and reseed any disturbed areas. Generally, low-cost and easily implemented construction noise control
measures should be incorporated into the project plans and specifications to the extent practicable These
measures may include but are not limited to work -hour limits equipment exhaust muffler requirements, haul -
road locations elimination of "tail gate banging" ambient -sensitive backup alarms construction noise complaint
mechanisms and consistent and transparent community communication
Construction activities may result in temporary noise occurrences but NCDOT will implement practices to
minimize noise during construction Existina trees/plantings generally do not provide noise reduction.
Themes Addressed:
• Request that the bridge width be reduced to 33 feet from the current design width.
Preliminary design alternatives were developed and evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need for
the project as well as how they minimize impacts to the human and natural environments. The proposed design
was selected based on those evaluations and with consideration to local standards for pedestrian facilities.
NCDOT will continue to minimize the proiect's impacts to adjacent parcels to the greatest extent practicable
during the refinement of preliminary and final designs As a result of the November 10 2022 public meeting, the
grass strip has been removed and the revised bridge width will be 46 feet on the approaches and 48 feet on the
bridge (34 feet of clear roadway width 45 feet and 5 inches from bridge rail to bridge rail).
Themes Addressed:
• Request that construction occur in the winter during the Town's off-season for tourism.
While project construction may extend into more heavily trafficked times of the year, NCDOT is working to create
a construction schedule that will avoid maior impacts during the area's busier seasons. Construction is
anticipated to begin in the Fall of 2023 and conclude by the end of Spring 2024.
Themes Addressed:
• question from local business owner asking if the proposed bridge design will remove the current kayak
access to Slash Creek that their business relies upon.
The right-of-way of the proposed design will maintain the same extents as current NCDOT right-of-way in the
project area During project construction the area immediately around and under the bridge will not be
accessible to the public in order to maintain a safe environment for the both the public and the construction
contractor crews.

STEWART
Themes Addressed:
• Question regarding the elevation of the proposed bridge design.
The proposed bridge design is at an elevation of 6.8 feet at its highest point and 6.61 feet at its lowest point
Themes Addressed:
• Request that no new drainage systems be installed on Islington Court to mitigate right of way impact to
adjacent parcels.
• Concern regarding flooding impacts in the project area after construction.
• Concern regarding flooding on the proposed detour route along Eagle Pass Road.
NCDOT is taking steps to ensure that this project will not cause any increase to the amount of flooding around
the proiect area. Current conditions will either remain consistent or be improved by the addition of the proiect. A
detailed hydraulic analysis will be conducted during the final design. Potential impacts to an adjacent Property
will be evaluated at that time and minimized to the extent practicable.
NCDOT will also continue to evaluate ways to reduce stormwater impacts to properties and will determine the
appropriate location for drainage boxes and other stormwater facilities during the refinement of final design
Themes Addressed:
• Request that the bridge be closed to through traffic and turned into a pedestrian bridge while also
shifting project funding to the maintenance of Isabel Inlet.
Preliminary alternatives were developed and evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need for the
proiect. Based on traffic demand patterns and the lifespan of the bridge it was determined that the proposed
design was the strongest alternative to meet these needs. NCDOT will continue to refine the project design to
minimize the impact on the surrounding area.
The project team met on January 20th, 2023 to review and consider each comment. The responses above
address the comments that were received. The project team greatly appreciates the input received. NCDOT
will continue to refine the project design, where feasible, based on the comments received. You may contact
the project staff listed below if you have any additional questions.
Kristy Alford, P.E.
NCDOT Structures Management Unit
1581 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1581
[phone] (Code 2301)
Michael Burns, P.E.
Project Manager
223 S. West St., Ste. 1100
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone] (Code 2301)

C
CD
V)
►�
LU
W
C
J

w
w
N
4-
N
s
N
m
V
CL
ui
z
0
m
z
0
0
U
a
x
N
fV
O
N
O
Of
m
7
ul
z
Q
0
x
H
6
0
a
W
m
fial
C4
Li
!1 U
C
aLU
Z
C�c
A

4-
<N
rei
U
w
a
a
z
3
w
W
0
c-,
U
Z
z
0
z
w
U
K
w
0
m
6
m
Ln
C0
0
z
w
0
a
a

. Q
W N
a

I
W
O
h
U
O
U
Pamlico Sound
Pamliro Sound Ga
OHaHerae �
a
�N
It �/
Atl.wk Ou..
VICINITY MAP
See Sleet 1A For Index of Sheets orr-Site Detour --o--c
See Sleet 1B For Conventlonol Symbols
STATE OF N®][$TH[ CAROILINA N.C, rt B-5610 R i
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS d.a ..-
45565.1.2 NHP-0012 016 PE
45565.2.1 0012268 1 RIGHT-OF-W/
45565.2.1 001m UTILITIES
Submitj�A 0 '3OUN7T PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
LOCATION. BRIDGE No.8 OVER THE SLASH ON NC 12 DATE: 1-20-23
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II.
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDRIES OF HATTERAS.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
2023 ADT = 4,496 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5610
50 25 0 50 IOD 2043 ADT = 5,912 VPD K 8%
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5610
=
PLANS D = 55% TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5610
50 25 0 50 100 T = 8% *
V = 40 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * (TTST 1% + DUAL 7%)
10 I I 5 0 70 20 FUNC. CLASS.=
MAJOR COLLECTOR
PROFILE (VERTICAL) REGIONAL TIER
= 0.137 mi.
0.019 mi.
= 0.156 mi.
O
Q5i 2�A0A f�4
GY—i Ifs u
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, PA
D
. • m.,... w
•0 0
sole srA "r CAHMS
ANDY YOUNG PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE.
PROj BNGfNHRR
AUGUST 19 2021
MICHAEL BURNS. PE
PRDPRGr DMGN sxctnmsR
LETTING DATE.
OCTOBER 17,_2023
KRISTY ALFORD. PE
NGWr WMACT
11
I �
1
I
1
�`
-- Te'FRISCo
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
RECEIVED
MAR U 9
DCM-EC
INCOMPLETE PLANS
R RIM AWV191ilOY
OOCUME.1 NOT CONtI0E11EO I..umm"YL 310N aRER COMPLMD

Submitted 2/28/2023
®DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
9T SIB. 10*00.00 /-L- PC Sto. 10+2671
-L- PT Sto. 10+5137
BEG) TlP
PROJE
L- POT S1a. 11+2
0
JG
4,AreRo
GIR
2WG
IQ E
EO M1GbM
ISLM'0 FERR/
YPNEO T.LGER G' G
—
F VAI
EN RETAINING WALL "A'�G4BGSJIEWALS_�_
PC
C®
Oyu
yoLN IMVAOA
1EP 905 MPR GMTF I
[LP9p�
E[M
0
2
0
0
DROVER LLC
HATTERAS UNITED
HATTERAS UNITED
DARREL ALLEN
06 D92 PG 95
METHODIST CHURCH
METHODIST CHURCH
DANELSAT UK
PC 8 SLOE 348
GB 139 PG 506
09 167 PC 299
OB 8 PG 278
OB KTO PG DA
MB 2 PC 225
OD A PC 480
OB 8 PO 420
O
0
®
0
HATTERAS VILLAGE
MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
PALMATIER. LLC
DB 2600 PG 903
SEE PROPERTY
OWNER INFO (THIS
JEFFREY LYNN
ODE�yNy, ET UK
DB DO PG 591
SHEET)
RI MIT PG 569p
DETAIL I �O
SPECIAL RCH (WAA.....
AN, �9
Gwtl O `
EEF CROD RI Of%
/ \ FROM. STA.10a25To SM.10+75-n- Lr
/ ` \ 50' 25' 0 50' 100'
SCALE: 1"=100'
THOMAS E.TODD.ET UK
L­ PT Sto.13+51JI
8-56/0 AD euvz xNEAT 0
� a o I-sre
L- PO Sto. 11+93b2 / C(Ass I f _ l- P Sto. 11+301
/ ED RAF To p PIER SLASH CREEK
2 G
GIVE RHBB
I5• czv / w0 oEcx
zsro
s
N H
c
E DE � O E 30"
—p1 IP / _
IT
5" CAU o
REMOVE
E..fl a LT DUE-Dw�E IN EWiuN : _
UC:f mxC mNC I /^ E A2 WOOD AND ADNCRETE ^ € F
/ III I WIT HH W DEN WINGWALLS i
II BRIDGED 19ETeS
RN BE
ISBN Sus '` TO
a EXInrtPER fl
MEd[AL [ENIEfl REMOVED
I �m OI
I I SLASH CREEK
SEE PERMIT DRAWING J
SHEET 4 OF 6 /
FOR ENLARGEMENT
_ I
LOW WOODEN BEAM=4.06' \
TOP OF WAR:R TO LOW BEAM BRIDGE CLEARANCE=9.29'
TEEEEFYINED A pAwsr. M PAMME EEKE
0
JEFFREY LYNN BEEN
HATTERAS VILLAGE
D0 1901 PG R
CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC.
PB 338 PG 569
DB 97195 P6 546
195K PG Al
O8 1Ob PG J
CIA125 DS PG JIb
ASPHALT SHOULDER
CHRISTY D. KELLUM
RE i9$6i�EJi4�
RICHARD ANDERSON
MO
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
BB 029GETT
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
N
91
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPL TE PLANS
w xor RSY aPw .uOwmoN
O Q ZU& SUNGATE DESIGN MR,, PA
SIEWART 7' ` t DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 6
DATE: 1-20-23
/J RICHARD ANDERSON
MIDDETT s
B x
S 'A ♦ y + I
—L— T to 29486B3B ,� B I
RE
m V y mI
IsrO
I I w V IF
ABUI
\ [u R9w ..Is
3 �1 SGYL /
EcM
WN—E 01 PD1CV�
e R
�
Fly/ O vw�OiFY ro 1[M[ N..
ISFP 25R0
�W000 1
CAAF \
RS[n
PML
"*�
J
9L�
w000s --
ND 71P ECF*B 56/0
9 F50DO
s
5:
�
w000s FRANK MILLER, JR.
O
00 -
\-
POT Sto. /7 +3 63=
I
_
Sto. ll+
6 46' 00A' W
SCOTT T.CALDWELL AND WIFE.
MARTHA F.IVIDED INTEREST,
A ONE -HALL UN INTEREST,
THE
AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIJR.. AND
JOSEPH M.MIDGETT.
J'a\
INTERE
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST, pS
TENANTS IN COMMON
L
RECEIVE®
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC
FOR -L- PROFILE.SEE SHEET 5
FOR -YI- PA:YIIE.SEE SHEET 5
STRUCTURE PLWSSEE SHEETS SNTHRV S-XX

Submitted 2/28/2023
®DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DETAIL 1 �o
SPEC L C INCH 8
J x�a9
uwa D r'
SEE C.!F SKIpHi
/ \ FROM STA. 10+2$ TO STA IOf 75 -YI- IS
/ ` \ SQ' 25' 0 50' 100'
/ SCALE: 1"=100'
THOMAS E. TWO. ET UK
NT 87',JO'253W xAJ � /
E IN STRU TION `\
-Yl- POT Sro. 10125
-L- POT 5/0.10+OODO L PC sro.10+267/ % 1 /1 )) /
/ -L- PT Sto.10+5197-Yl- PC Sro. 483
-L- PT Sro.13+5 / 1 l6l
EG/N TlP PROJE B-56/0 wu euxnce
L- 5/a. I1+2 .00 h I o .In so
«B Rec St".
1I+30J
O Sra. 11+93�2 // 5 Ne RAP r PER SL4 CRFE o (fit p s 'E P
/ ! TB 2GSD VA �u \> O S' w sF
/ "no G pl Re /:5•
zsr I 6R zsro �mvcl / ..L �( s pP 1•
BUSAO I I \ /
X Ecu� oix � I �� °� o
L_ xE E 24• n E DE p E J9 c > 1 BLB R a
GI IP x x
-TTE
-
0..KEN XC 121Z EO RV4FY b
ISLAND FERRY 3 $ �RfMOYE _rm—If' G _
SP�EG SIHVILL'R �6' _ __
BK RETAINING WALL F • CMP P151 ' Tc; _
cave 1 pI GdAP is / F EEP E PD
�cDDc xor. _ l 15• DUE UE GI
me / I
MR, corvc / � / /WO�ANO AOHLRETE I� � F� Bszm IsrB
zsro
Y4AOA o b ITH W OQEN WINGWALLS : I �\
MP GMTE
zsF Bus s\ /¢ ` I TMp 1 '—ISF'ECS I 1 \ \ • G
aOERE
qYEpp
SLASH R RE l a L- srD. n
SEE PERMIT DRAWING ��� \ Z —� POT Sto.n+3 J
SHEET 4 OF 6 -J \ 16POT Sta.I+ J
-- P FOR ENLARGEMENT
LOW WOODEN BEAM=4.06'
TOP OF WATER TO LOW SEAM BRIDGE CLEARANCE=9.24'
THE NISFpp.' X.G4 WOER . [YY/1O ROT NE
OEEERY/NEo OF PA,.. M PAAlE EV/CEKY
O
2A
O
®
O
O
DROVER LLC
HATTERAS UNITED
HATTERAS UNITED
DARREL ALLEN
JEFFREY LYNN BEEN
HATTERAS VILLAGE
DB 592 PG 95
PC B SLIDE 348
METHODIST CHURCH
DB 159 PC 506
METHODIST CHURCH
08 IMT PG 2"
OAMELS. ET UK
08 970 RC 04
DO Hp4 PG IP
FEE BBB PB 569
CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC.
OB 974 PC 546
0B PC 278
OB A PC 480
M9 2 PG 225
09 1954 PC 41
VB D94 PC 506
DE)B PC 420
09 R5 PC 516
HATTERAS VILLIAGE
MEDICLA ASSOCIATES
IA
PALMATIER, LLC
BB 26M PG 90B
SEE PROPERTY
OWNER
JEFFREY LYNN
MEN,ITUX
CHRIS TY O. KELLUM
6TT
9cESO
C
RICHARD MCDOANDERSON
J0PC
SHEET)
U&PC56a
DB 255PC BT9
0 ASPHALT SHOULDER
0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
0
RICHARD ANDEHSON
MIDGETT
C
-L- Pr
r
IsrB �' I 1
II
II
t� CMI I
aP O SMX/ - _ To FR/$CO
1 �uGi.\I: R
c�LILy f W000 iA IL 1 )
RAIL JI(Jj'
ND TIP JE +8-56/0
+50.00
FRANK MILLER. JR. '
SCOTT T. CALDWELL AM WIFE.
MARTHA F.CALOWELL,
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST.
AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY AND
JOSEPH M. MIDGETT. JR.,
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST,AS
TENANTS IN COMMON
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM—EC
FOR -L- PROPIMSEE SHEET 5
FOR -YI- PROFIEE.SEE SHEET 5

FROJEa MNNN<F NO. SHEET NO.
B-5610 NLABGEMLN
DENOTES IMPACTS
IN
SMEF NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYORAuuCS
SURFACE WATER
ENGINFERF0. ENGINEER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
�bti
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WA-86bmltt@d 2/28/2023
14' 5' 0 10' 20'
CLASS 11
SCALE: 1'= 20'
UDOCUNAENT NO CONSID COMPLETED
LET
DEILESOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED COMPLETED
RIP RAP
TO
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 6
35HOULDER
INT
DATE: 1-20-23
/
30
KETT FENCE
o
\
CAAP
o
Oo\0°
P
o° o
--- —
— --
la
°g
Cm
--------------
-CMpo
g
°
---
--
-
- —.—
°
o
0
\
j
o
15" CAAP
I
o
°
I
B-
CI
—
o
-
O
—
— --
°�IND
PIONS
O o0
ut
DUE
BST
EXISTING
zI
RECEIVED
E
BRIDGE
c z
/
-
TO BE
n
-
MAR 0 9 2023
REMOVED
=
DCM-EC

■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I■�®■■7�L•�■
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
■■■■■■■1nor
■■■■■■■■■!��■1�■■■■■■■■■■■■I■d5�®4]■
W■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■��il�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■1■7■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■1
ml
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1
-
DO CONSIDERED
■■■■■■--------■■■■■ONATURESCOMPLUED
■■wo
■■1■■■■■�l■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�
1
Iy.YY7I/Li.'
fi
Qq�'LL:IIfi
.,.�
■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■®■■■
■■■■■■■Z==■-��,....�■oaf■ii��
1�■q0■■����.•
IIIIIIIIIIIIIN
1
�n��
..��SL=■0■■■■■■■A
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a��..f
Z�.�i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.._,
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
�7�■`�i�■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■!1■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■
I■■■■■■■■■■■�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■.�F1■_�!�JJ��}■_}���IFI1��m}}®�i��R.■
Effil■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■`�11'�'YYiillGa
EME3�m
1
1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1
r-]sr'rar]z•
....
.r
tea....,
1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�l�■■.���i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�
ram. ,..:;�e�iii11�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■���■■■■�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■i�ii�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�����■■■�
1
��ii�'i■�f'iiii�■�il�i■�
����■■®ail
n
N
5509
FIF9A
ION -
396
s.]s•
]
P
D
BO
ON
IRE
96
F
A110N
3.
550
50
F 39
909
S%
IN F
GF OF
PA
N!

WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
14+59 to 15+22-L-
ROADWAY FILL
0.007
0.052
95
15
15+70 to 16+12-L-
0.020
0.027
14+98 to 15+23-L-RT
36" PIPE
0.004
15+75 to 15+85-L-LT
30" PIPE
0.002
TOTALS`:
0.03
0.08
95
15
`Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Interior bent= 32sgft.
2018 Feb
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC

U
w
0
Pamliw Sound
VICINITY MAP
Pamlico Sound
Arlmic OCIDN
Submitted 2/28/2023
GRAPHIC SCALES
sG`,�ro��s�o
PLANS
50 45 0 50 100
ilin
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
UTILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PLANS
DARE COUNTY
LOCATION. BRIDGE NO.8 OVER THE SLASH CREEK
ON NC 12
TYPE OF WORK: TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WATER
AND POWER RELOCATION
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
INDEX OF SHEETS
r1CC/`D IOTTlL.�I
TITLE SHEET
UTILITY PLAN SHEETS
UTILITY PROFILE SHEETS
UTILITY OWNERS ON PROJECT
(A) LUMEN -
(B) CHARTER - TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(C) CAPE HATTERAS ELECTRIC - POWER
PREPARFD IN OM OFFICE DE
2 pVG STEAR 0
MICHAEL BURNS, PE PROJECT ENGINEER
JOSHUA ROEMER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
i
ff jB-
.P.NO. SJE-1
610
PRELIMINARY PLANS
no m mE wE wxLrxumlox
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
DATE: 1-20-23
INCOMPLETE PLANS
w Nm V98 loA P/V wNV191nOY
OOCUMEM NOT CONSIDERED EIMLL
J
UNLEAS ALL SIGNATU E6 COMPLETED
sEAI
DIVISIONOF HIGHWAYS
S U
UTILITIES
IsssFVl saacES ss cexreN RAEEIGH
b69w
/
9) )0151
�
ftlx lmvl l56lISl
F"PHO(9 9) 23
r9
l
NABIL HAMDAN UTD.ITIES REGIONAL ENGINEER
TYRON W. STALLINGS UIILHIES LEAD
TANGA SAMPSON UHLHIES A COORDIAATOR
TYRON W. STALUNGS UTILHIES COORDINATOR

] oGPS-I
- POT Sto. 10+00.00 /-L- PC Sta.10+26.71
-L- PT Sto. lO+`
Submit /
/Id
pVsep
`
4c,
RA1
® O-
fP fp_S
-- OCR fN
"T 12 PZPWEB
I5:AW0 FERRY
I PMED .S,N1lllLM
TIE TO EXISTING
-WL- Sta. 5+00.00
BB RaAIHNG "A`; AWE
2SF BUS
U
LM
PLAN VIEW - ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS
DETAIL 1
SPECML CUT UNCH
INs s.a4
•
sEE`c°rosi RCiaNS
nw LO.25 TO mA10w6 -YI- M
-L- PT S
55 rLA 13 B`L1sto. CUBS
OVE iHN\4lj/;p/ p SFp
IS' CMP il/
Z-
DROVER LLC
OB 1992 PO %
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODST CHURCH
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
DARREL ALLEN
DANIELS. ET UX
JEFFREY LYNN BEEN
DB RICO PG III
HATTERAS VILLAGE
CIVIC ASSOCIATION INI
a B SLOE 348
0a 139 PO 506
DB I1 PG 2"
DB a PG 276
OB *70 PG M4
MB 2 PO 225
PS 311 PG 569
DB 9174 PO 546
BE 1954 PG 41
OB A PG 400
OR B PG 420
OB M94 PG 306
08 MS PO 376
HATTERAS VILLAGE
MEDIC ASSOCIATES
PALMATIER. LLC
DO 2600 PO 903
SEE PROPERTY
OWNER
JEFFREY LYNN
CHpRBISTgY D. �KELpLUM
PO II 55LIOE3119
RICHARD ANDERSON
TT
I30 1
SHEEWORD I(THIS
pOBDE55N55BEPOUX
P9 A0 PO 569
DB 256EPC 879
h
TIE TO EXIST]
-WL2- Sta. (5+j0\0..
5+
t \/
TIgMp1B5zDE.}TODD.OE3T U%
PC H TSIIDE li9
I-I/I SIO
W.I
�� 3Y9nn
CAMP
=cwain�I 15 _
0
RICXAflD ANDERSON
M10GETT
Da 1034 PG 532
ME 4 PG 63
Y s +1
♦
Y
I -L-
r for O'P86b3+
,� '+ i
I
IsfO N TO P CT
sta. 9+
A, +
+F1
To FRrsco�
d
gCA
AONCRETE
VM
F
ell
E
J-Lav`ssl
P
D00 ANO K REM IVIA
rsIp zsrp GAAP wp00
ae w
N TIE TO EXISTING
�
H WOODEN WINGWALLS .
I
RAIL
-WI Sta. I,
I o'
Boom
IIBE
Is 6w
/
1
�l
-WL- fl. 12+ 15=
13+77.44
Tom
x /s R /
"*y
Amps -- -WL2- Sta. S+/111666�-`Qf
NO Tip
J CY*-10
SLASH CREEK 8
a \
L- - Sto.O+ ' n J
- - III
to. 19+50A0
��
4 O C)
f
wppp3 -
DB 2062 PG 723
FRAM! MILLER, JR.
- POT Sto.T7+3 .63-
11
+46AB
P46�' bra./it
1
'I-
aW
LOW WOODEN BEAM=4.06'
TOP OF WATER TO LOW BEAM BRIDGE CLEARANCE=4.24'
IOFIERYINEO F'PMSL/L SO P0.Po(£ EVICEXLE
ASPHALT SHOULDER
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PAVEMEM REMOVAL
/ \SONET. CALDWELL AND WIFE, MARTHA F.CALDWELL,
-
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST,
AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY AND
JOSEPH ND VIIDED IN ERE
A OM-XTEN All.
INTEREST, AS
TENANTS IN COMNION
p0 2295 PG 28
TIE TO EXISTING
-WL3- Sta. 5+26.74
-WL- Sta. 12+43.15=
-WL2- Sta. 6+16.21
DECEIVE®
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC
FOR -L- PXpERE. SEE SHEET 5 I

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
TLA D IMPACTS Tu—R—FA—CE—WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
14+56 to 16+31-L-RT
LUMEN AND CHARTER
OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
14+96-L-LT
EXTG POLE/PED REMOVAL
13+98 to 16+87-L-RT
WATER LINE
DIRECTIONAL BORE
TOTALS':
0
0
0
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
No Environmental Impacts for Utility Relocations
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2023
DCM-EC

J `et
Highway Stormwater ProgramT
WBS Element: 45565.1.1 TIP No.: B-5610 Count tes : Dare Page 1 of 1
WBS Element: 45565.1.1 ITIP Number: B-5610 Project Type: Bride Replacement Date: 11/712022
NCDOT Contact:
Kristy Alford, P.E.
Contractor / Desi ner:
Josh Dalton, P.E.
Address:
NCDOT Structures Management Unit
Address:
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
1581 Mail Service Center
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27699
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone:
919-707-6531
Phone:
919-859-2243
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
'dalton sun atedesi n.com
City/Town:
Hatteras
Count ies :
Dare
River Basins :
Pas uotank ICAMA
County?
Yes
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Project Length tin. miles or feet):
- - - "'.` Surroundin Land Use: Residential, Commercial
` " S 6
1{"`' as
1.1 ac.
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
One paved 11' lane in each direction with 4' paved shoulders and variable with paved
One paved 15' lane in each direction with 2'-6" curb and gutter.
swales.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 5842 Year: 2042
Existing: 4,425 Year: 2022
General Project Narrative:
B-5610 is a bridge replacement project that involves removing Dare County bridge #8, on NC 12 over Slash Creek, and replacing it with a 1@45' and 1@50' 21" Cored Slab
(Description of Minimization of Water
bridge with 4' end bent caps. The existing bridge is 5@17' timber deck on timber piles with timber abutments. The proposed structure will not have deck drains, and existing
Quality Impacts)
drainage patterns have been maintained.
j U N 0 2 2023
D C M 4H
Surface Water Bod 1 :
Slash Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
30-22-30-1
Primary Classification:
Class SA
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Supplemental Classification:
High Quality Waters HQW
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
NIA
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Bod ?
Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? INIA
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
JNo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

NMILo Sound
0
Pamlico Sound
>tatle.n.
Y.
4yi,y
Cf
N
/ ss
^-_ A6amic Ocean
rvoa ro�rvsemon i�
VICINITY MAP
S I'A rF, OF ORTH CAROLI -A
DIVIISIfl;,- OF IIG:HA-V-�YS
DARE COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE No. 8 OVER THE SLASH ON NC 12
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
..: WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
TOTAL
.
B-5610 1
°
45565.1.2
NHP-0012 Ol§1_L PE
45565.2.1
0012068 RIGHT—OF—WAY
45565.2.1
0012068 UTILITIES
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
DATE: 5-31-23
NECEIVED
IUN 0 2 2923
DCM-EC
INCDMPLET'E PLA
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II.
•
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDRIES OF HATTERAS. vvcvMENr xor can3loEREO PIxaL
�.•
YNLE44ILL 4I4NITVRES CYMPLEIEY
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
n,y ,,d in the Office, cf.
ENGINEER
50 25 0 50 100
2023 ADT = 4,496 VPD
2043 ADT = 5,912 VPD
K =Bo/a
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5610 = 0.197 mi.
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5610 0.019 mi.
STEWAR.RT
_
"':"•.v a""-
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP PA.
C
l�l
OPROFILE
1
V
D = 55%
-
T — 40 P
V = 40 MPH
# TTST 1% + DUAL 7%
( )
FUNC. CLASS.=
MAJOR COLLECTOR
REGIONAL TIER
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5610 = 0.156 mi.
PE.
s
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
201e sraxnnxn SPECIFranoxs
— _. _AN DYPROJECT RVG p PE
MICHT BURNS, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
AUGUST 19 2021
LETTING DATE:
OCTOBER 17, 2023
sI ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
Pa
(HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 p0
TE
PROJECT uPsrcN NNaxNER
KRISTY ALFORD-PE
NCTOT CONTACT
.......,,. ,,...,r„-.,,

p = 0' 45' 422(RT)
ns = 0' l5' 282' 2T1
ns = 3' 48' 10.4' 1
D = 3' 00' 56.9
D = 009' 493'
D = 2' 26' 54.7'
L = 2526'
L = /575'
L = 15531'
T = 12.63'
T = 76.75'
T 77.68'
R = 1,900.00
R = 35,000.00'
R - 2340.00'
SB = Exist.
5, = NC
SB = 257
Runoff = 65'
/-L- PC Sto. 10*26.71
-L- PT SID. 10+�
0
/ 5 MAIN
5 51'13'06-
S 50' .' 247Z EJ I
-7/-
Pl Sto 19+88.03
PI SIC, /0+9457
A = 5' 32' 37,9' (RT)
p = 45' 23' 34J' (LT)
0 = 3' 50 43S
0 = 60' 18' 405'
L = 144JT
L = 7526'
T = 72J4'
T 39.73'
R - 1,49ODLY
R = 95.00'
S. = 37
Se = 357
Runoff = 78'
Runoff = 43.75'
✓o = 15 MPH
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY En
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
- rI JIU.I
- rL, era. nr7.9nc
t
�I REMOVE � -188 LF/
TS �.
1 `__IIS' CAM
/ i Pitts' uav ``, 4 of DIDI DI
�- I5- CAA,
caM
DETAIL 1 �90
I SPECIAL COi DITCH
cp li�9�Djl
IF cao5s SICYI- LT i
FRON 5TA 10+25 10 STA 10+15 -09- Li
\ 50' 25' 0 50' 100'
SCALE: 1"=100''
/(/ THOMAs E. roo0. ET ux
1 N
p /\\
- POT .9r l0 AO
3T 50 25.9' W
CONSTRUCTION
POT Sto. 10+25.00
-L- PCC Sta. l9+ISB9
-Yl- PC Sic. l 483
7+51J1
`��
I / RICHARO ANDERSON
MILSETT
_ I-
PT Sta. 1I+30J'
•
1
�}\ - --- _
SPEC, CUT � �
iCY.
-L-PT
DITCH
5[E oEiaR
-L-
OI
/ 15 P
J �R DVE -215 LF
OF15 MCMP„
WMH GTO
I F
/
DEii
BD' cony.-,. I3
CA41E
/+�
m F ss' I
1
_
� '•
�RETNN 1 I
REMOVE �,Egri
I
CB I—EJ �,
)w TE Ir CAA, BRIDGE
�YIDGEEG
_ TO
BE
RffAOV'A
SEE PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 6
FOR ENLARGEMENT
O
2A
O
O
O
O
DROVER LLC
OB 1992 PC 95
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
DARREL ALLEN
DANIELS, ET OX
JEFFREY LYNN ODEN
00 1904 P6 III
HATTERAS VILLAGE
CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC.
PC B SLIDE 348
OB 139 PC 506
00 1617 PC 299
OB B P6 278
08 16TO PC 04
MB 2 PC 225
PB 330 PO 569
OB 374 P6 546
00 1954 P6 41
OB A PC 480
OB B PC 420
00 1994 PC 306
OB 125 PO 3T6
O
O
O
O
D
HATTERAS VILLIAGE
MEDICS AsOCI TES
PALMATIER, LLC
09 2600 PC 9D3
SEE PROPERTY
(THIS
OWNEPC
JEFFREY LYNN
Ep0 UX0
CHRISTY D. KELLUM
FC 195 PGSLID308
RICHARD ANDERSON
MIDGET
6p 591
SHEEOI
OOgOE5N.
PB 35 PG 569
OB 0T9
- ASPHALT SHOULDER
® CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
1 -J
1 -L- POT Sta. l7+3
1 -Yl- PDT Sto. 11+4
h S 46.46' 00.0' W /
RETAIN `
G9-56/0
FRANK MILLER, JR.
SCOTT T. CALDWE'_L AND WIFE,
MARTHA F. CA,DWELL.
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST,
AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETY AND
JOSEPe. M. MIDIGET T, JR..
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST. AS
TENANTS IN COMMON
1 U N 0 2 2023
DCM-EC
41*22' 04J' E
FOR -L- Pi ILE,SEE SHEET 5
FOR -YI- PROFWE,SEE SHEET 5
-------------
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS.SEE SHEETS S-ITHRU S-XX

P1 Stu 10+39.34
P1 Sto 12+79.36
Pl SID 18+3626
Pl Sto 19+88.03
PI SID 10+9457
p = 945'42.P(RTI
L = 0'15'282'(LT)
6, = 3'48'10.4'(RT)
�, = 537.57-7(RT)
6s = 45'23'34f(LT)
D = 3' 00' 56D'
D = 00'493'
D = 2' 26' 54.7•
D = 3' 50' 433'
0 = 60.18' 40B'
L = 2526'
L = 15750'
L = 15501'
L = 144.17'
L = 7526'
T = 1263'
T = 78.75'
T = 77.68'
T = 72J4'
T = 39.73'
R = 1,900A0
R = 35.000A0'
R = 2340.W
R = 1,490,09
R = 95.00'
SO = Ex15t.
SO = NC
SIR = 25%
SO = 37.
S = 35Z
Runoff = 65'
Runoff = 78'
Rurroff = 43.75'
Va = l5 MPH
i 'kETAIN -
-� S 5/'13'06.4'E-
C SIG. 10426.71
-L- PT Sta. 10+5/.91
BEGIN TIP
L- P"T
TO
AT
it
1 I E_ 1
h
N
-
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY In
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
I -L- PT Sta. I
70JEC'T B-5610
I1+2 .00
l -L- PC Sto. 11+9362 cuss It
RIP RAP TO -
SMOUID�=
ME
REOVE - EBB If
R1 G P
G f
I
{Y
z<- c P DE II5 CAA` AAr I
E DI E
1 — _
C6 _ 5w.E C Fry
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH �\
�,. suo-: j N F-
All
0>
SEE C0.055 I-ITNS
FROM. STA 10. 25 10 STA. 10+ I5 -TL Li
so' zs' o so' 100'
% f17 SCALE: I"
J1 THOMAS E. TODD. ET .
POT S.00
N 8T 50 9 W I \
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION \\
-YI- POT 90. /0+}25
I -Yl- PC sta.I "5483 \\\
II \
�� T II- PT Sta. 11+30.1 _ \ • -
5YEC. CUT C
CH
5�E DETAIL
DI
-2]5 LF
je
O 1S� O 1S R
WMHCT
-- v DE 30. Cenr e.1-1--
T DIJ Y-
Ab Var pl
DI
�Is w,P CRAP E DI PDE 1
r-- — / )DUES DU5 DUEDUE DUE - - .. E
a CITL
1' I E ( -_ •�iR2I ADA E 7L
S 50' ' 242' E Arogov' GPATE �r I:., �d i1�GL
BRIDGE £g Eg
/ TDaz EXIST ?POI POlB�.
Ro MED
1 r L- PC Sto. /7+
1
-- -- -- I _ Lj �
SEE PERMIT DRAWING /' -L- POT vto n+1
• -Y1- POT Sto. 11+4l
L✓I SHEET 4 OF 6 / s 46 46'00.o w
FOR ENLARGEMENT �
2A
0
O
O
O
DROVER LLC
DO 1992 PG 95
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
HATTERAS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
DARREL ALLEN
DANIELS. ET UK
JEFFREY LYNN ODEN
DB 1904 PG lu
HATTERAS VILLAGE
CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC.
PC 0 SUDE AB
DB 139 P6 506
DO 161T PG 299
DO 0 PO 278
DO 16TO PC 104
MB 2 PG 225
PB 130 PO 569
DB 9T4 PC 546
DO 1954 P6 41
DO 0 PG 420
OB I125 PC 3T66
HATTERAS VILLIAGE
MEDICAL AS50CIATES
PALMATIER. LLC
00 2600 PO 903
SEE PROPERTY
OWNER INFO (THIS
JEFFREY LYNN
ET UK
CHReISTY D. pKEL0LgUM
RC 1 55pIDE31i9
RICHARD ANDERSON
MI
DO LSD P6 591
SHEET)
poOgDEN,
PB 3;18 p� 569
OB PG BT9
i
— ASPHALT SHOULDER
— CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
N
-r rot- �Ta. ly*lay
RICHARD ANDERSON
NFOCETT
J ' -L- PT
I
RETAIN
`RE IN
��S 4T 22' 04P f
I
END 7/P ROJECT 13-56/0
-L- POC to. 19+50A0
' FRANI, KILTER. JR. '
/
-- �_ J
SCOTT T. CALDWELL AND WIFE.
MARTHA F. CALDWELL.
C ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST,
AS TENANTS BY THE ENTIRETI AND
JOSEPH M. MIDGETT. JR..
A ONE-HALF UNDIVIDED INTEREST. AS
TENANTS IN COMMON
J U N 0 2 2023
DC —EC
FOR -L- PROFI(E,SEE SHEET 5
FOR -YI- PROFI(E.SEE SHEET 5

DENOTES IMPACTS IN
PROJECT REFERENCE NO, I SHEET NO.
a-seEI aacEreE
MM SHEET NO,
RG DESIGN HENGINEIGS
SURFACE WATER
ENGINEER
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
em
°bti
CLASS 11
o s o a zo
RI P RATO —
SCALE: 1'=ZOO
�--- —
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHOULDER P`, INT
SHEET 4 OF b
DATE: 5-31-23
—
DE
15„
— — - _
30" CRAP,
CRAP
1
CB
Cl
r
15" CAAP
CB
C
36
7w-
- S
S �
r
-- --CB_
7r-
—
• ,—
D U
- DUE
"DUE
EXISTING
_
E
BRIDGE
_>> r
���
TO BE
REMOVED
_ J U N °z 2023
DCM-EC

BRIDGE IIYDRAU IC DATA
—CPS
DESIGN-DISCRAR
DESIGN FREOUEf��CY
-
=''I N/A
YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
='I N/A
FT
BASE DISCHARGE
=! N/A
CFS
FREO(AFAI.ly
l00
YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION
='. 4.0
FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE
_. N/A '..
CPS
OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY
<I00
YRS
FT
j
FT
DATE OF SURVEY
5-21-2019
AT DATE OF SURVEY
0.3
FT
PERMIT
SHEET
DRAWING
5
OF 6
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
5"EEF NO.
B-5610
5
°ADESIGNHYDRAULICSGINER
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
]�CO2]PL
TE PLANS
N/x
DATE:
5-31-23
STE ARTS
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, PA
A
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES
FINAL
COMPLETED
VG J09'
K
II
°
85
Cl STA 15+425 A
y
p
+
i a
t\
BEGIN GRADE
Pl = 12+I5.00
Wia[w 90 0EG�S
o
° 47
PI -
l +05A0
NO GR
E
G. + .
EL 221
CL EL- e BE
III
In
I"
EL =
B5'
0.
EL. = 2.48'
VC = l8d
Low -.
EMISiING BRIDG
TO BE REMOVE q
L. 2J2'
K = 80
Low c DID
DID
J3
KC=
66
I
I w
12L` _ _.
— — 36• — —
_�
Ml
.
3 G_ _
—1
a'3X/.
TE iO TO'bF
I
LOPING ABUT ENT
EMEND ABUTMENT
EST. CY
FST.4 CY
ROE
Y
TO OP BERM
z:1 ORMAL
EXISTING G� NO BASED ROPOSED
NWS ON 5,�1-3p19
ALIGNMWT, DOES NOT (REPRESENT
dONDIiIONS AiI P0.0PO5E0 Pl OUTLETS
AND MEAN (TIDE LEVEL �MT� 03
',. '..
BM pl
]13 ELEVATION 5.T5'
N 550902 E 2988457
!
_ TALdN t
_ _
PAINTED CAP BOLT ON
IRE HYDRAIJi
i
POW.SE
SHEET 4
OR STIK
E PLAYS.SE SHEER S-!THREE
S-XA
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18
19
20
21
BM A2
196
ELEVATION
28d'
N 550
50 E 29
8903
R0. SPI
IN FOGE OF
PAVEMENT
nry 1a. 10+ ( VC = 50' L. t 4.45'
= L9R' K 1 = /7
i
- Pl STA 1I -Y - LT
r2�
ELEV= 0
DI CH LEG ND
LEFT D CH — -----
FDR -YI- PWLS SHEET 4
10 11

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
14+59 to 15+22-L-
ROADWAY FILL
0.007
0.052
95
15
15+70 to 16+12-L-
0.020
0.027
14+98 to 15+23-L-RT
36" PIPE
0.004
15+75 to 15+85-L-LT
30" PIPE
0.002
TOTALS:
0.03
0.08
95
15
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb
CPVED
I U N a 2 2d23
DCm-c