Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCDOT 106-12 B-2500 Phase I Structure Monitoring 6/14/2017 Brittingham, Cathy From: Herring, Kathy Sent: Wednesday,June 14, 2017 10:24 AM To: Huggett, Doug; Brittingham, Cathy Subject: May scour report Attachments: N CDOT_9May2017_B-2500_Structure_Scou r_Mon itori ng_Report.pdf 4-1 Here you go. (� �j�qC ^ \S k1 O,\� Y Kathy Herring Environmental Program Supervisor Natural Environment Section, Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation 919 707 6128 office 919 971 4367 mobile mkherrincancdot.gov 1020 Birch Ridge Drive 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 ft _ Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Facebook Twitter YouTube Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 — Ec-eC t+- 1,02 -FA\ \5 ra,15 Celebrating 15 Years rkp } bs Snc1vckS n o�vc�eS a� Ck EPI May 31, 2017 ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Kathy Herring North Carolina Department of Transportation Natural Environment Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27699 Subject: Bonner Bridge Mitigation Structure Scour Monitoring and Inspection Pamlico Sound, Oregon Inlet (B-2500) Bridge Replacement Project Dare County, NC Executive Summary In 2012 CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. was contracted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to conduct seagrass mitigation to compensate for losses anticipated to occur during the replacement of the Bonner Bridge over Oregon Inlet (Fonseca, 2015). This project is part of a larger long-term effort to determine the best strategy and methodology for seagrass or submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) restoration in North Carolina. A wave attenuation structure with hard surface habitat suitable for colonization by algae, oysters and other sessile communities was completed in February 2017. Due to the potential for scour in this dynamic system the NCDOT has requested a structure scour monitoring regime for the B-2500 Bonner Bridge wave attenuator (Figure 1). The structure monitoring plan will provide monthly data and observations to help determine sand transport along bottom of the structure. Field measurements, underwater photos and wind patterns will be used to determine scour depths. This document summarizes data collected during the May 9, 2017 site visit. Project Purpose and Need SEPI Engineering and Construction was contracted by NCDOT Natural Environment Section to conduct monthly scouring monitoring, survey subsided units, check structure integrity and collect water quality parameters. The main purpose of the site visit on May 9, 2017 was to collect measurements at the scour monitoring stations, inspect and document subsided reef units and a structural integrity check. Monthly field measurements are compared to the established baseline to determine if the structures bottom scouring will reach an equilibrium or continue to increase in depth. Subsided units will continue to be monitored to determine bottom impact and structure integrity. Task Completed by SEPI • Provided two staff, multi-parameter water quality meter, secchi disk, leveling rod with underwater photos, aqua scope and shallow draft vessel. 1025 Wade Avenue I Raleigh, NC 127605 I Phone: 919.789.9977 I Fax: 919.789.9591 sepiengineering.com I @SEPlengineers r SEPI • Collected water quality parameters, measured scour depths and photo documented scour monitoring stations. • Conducted structural inspection, collected measurements and photo documented subsided units. • Video reviewed scour monitoring stations and subsided units. Tools and materials used to collect scour measurements and inspect structure: • (1) 25' Level Rod • (1) 6' Level • (1) GoPro Hero Camera • (1) GoPro Studio Methods Scour Measurements and Structure Stability Inspection Prior to collecting scour depth measurements water quality parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, conductivity, specific conductivity, salinity, pH and Secchi depth) were collected on the north and south side of piling 51. Structure monitoring and scour data collection was conducted during mid ebb tide switching to low tide conditions. Data collection for scour monitoring occurred at seven (7) scour monitoring stations (Figure 2, Table 1). In order to maintain consistency scour depth measurements started at the north of the eco-disks then continued clockwise to the west. Using a level rod, measurements were taken from the tops of eco-disks at all stations to the depth of the scour below the bottom disks. These measurements were compared to the established baseline to evaluate monthly scour depths (Table 3). Additional measurements included the top of disk to the top of the piling. The top of the disk to the bottom of the top clamp was measured as well. These measurements are used to determine if the disks subside from a stationary point. Following manual data collection, a level rod was submerged to the bottom floor and stations were videoed for desktop review. During the video review process, the distance from the bottom disk to the scour depth was noted. The reef units were inspected from an underwater view to determine the extent of scouring and structural integrity. Stations Scour monitoring The measured water level depth was 5.0'on the south side of the structure at piling 51. Water levels remained high during field data collection due to North Northwest (NNW) winds increasing throughout the day and gusting up to 20 mph. Due to increasing winds the water clarity was at a minimum. The maximum secchi disk depth reading was 35"at the beginning of the day. Acquiring clear underwater photos was difficult due to decreased visibilities at the site. Collected field measurements and photos were reviewed, compiled and compared to the established baseline. 2 SEPI Summary Cumulative monthly winds from January 1, 2017 to May 9, 2017 exhibited multidirectional wind patterns, from the north-northeast (NNE), north-northwest (NNW) and south-southwest (SSW). Extended periods of winds ranged from 15 -20 mph with occasional winds of 20 -25 mph, gusting to greater than 30 mph from the SSW (Chart 1). Prevailing winds between the April and May 2017 site visit were from the SSW direction. Sustained winds were between 20 and 30 mph, gusting to over 35 mph (Chart 2). Scour depths at the wavebreak structure increased in all locations except the south side of piling 76 (Figure 2, Table 1). The largest scour depth observed on both sides of the structure was at piling 25. This site had accumulated sediment to the bottom the structure in March and has since scoured to a depth -3.0'on both sides. Pilings 1 and 50 increased -1.7' and -1.79' on the north since the baseline was established. Less of a scour increase was observed on the south of these two locations with depths of-0.75' and -1.19'. Piling 51 scoured less overall with scour depths of - 0.6' north and -0.25' south. Piling 52 has increased to a scour depth of -1.37' north and 1.67 south since monitoring began. Piling 101 has increased -0.82' north and - 0.72' south. Overall seasonal trends, show an increased scour depth on the north side of the structure at pilings 25, 50, 52 and 76 (Figure 3). North scour depths at pilings 1, 51 and 101 were similar during the March and April visits and increased during May data collection. The south side of piling 76 scour depths have been similar since data collection began. All locations seemed to be experiencing flow beneath the bottom eco- disk from all directions. Even though some have slipped down a foot or so, all reef units are still fully functioning as wave attenuators. Subsided Units and Structure Stability Inspection Structural inspection began with collecting notes and walking across the top eco-disk of all 101 ReefMaker units. Subsided units were evaluated to determine extent of subsidence and bottom scour depths (Figure 2). Collected measurements included, top of the eco-disk, to the top of piling, and distance from top of disk, to the bottom of the top clamp (Figure 1, Table 2). These measurements were collected to compare the extent of subsidence since the field visit on March 21, 2017. Following data collection, all subsided units were videoed for desktop review. During the video review process, the distance from the bottom disk to the scour depth was noted. The overall structural integrity was checked to determine the degree of subsidence and impact per individual ReefMaker unit. Summary During subsided reef units' inspection, a total of nine (9) units were evaluated and inspected. The largest cluster of subsided units were located at the beginning of the western wing. These reef units were located at pilings P57, P60, P65 and P66. The location with the most subsidence measured was 2.1' at piling 25. The south side of piling 65 had a scour depth increase of -1.6' since the March site visit. Pilings 8, 25, 33, 57, 60, 66 and 94 had increased scour depths ranging from -0.3, to -1.25'. Other than the newest subsided unit at piling 96, no other location increased in subsidence. All locations seemed to be experiencing flow beneath the bottom eco-disk from all directions. During desk top review all stations were inspected and appeared to be intact. 3 SEPI We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the information we have provided. Sincerely, Jason Hall Environmental Project Manager 5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B Wilmington, NC 28403 Direct: 910-523-5715 Cell: 919-868-6044 Attachments: 1) Figure 1- B-2500 Mitigation Structure Project Vicinity Map 2) Figure 2 - B-2500 Mitigation Structure Monitoring 3) Figure 3 Monthly Scour Depths 4) Table 1 - Scour Monitoring Stations 5) Table 2 - Subsided Units 6) Table 3 - Baseline 7) Chart 1 - 1Jan2017 - 9May2017 8) Chart 2 - 19April2017 - 9May2017 - Oregon Inlet Wind Directions 9) Site Photos References Oregon Inlet Marina Wind Rose Plot [Charts]. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/sites/dyn_windrose.phtml?station=ORIN7&ne twork=NC 4 .. ,4„,,,,,,,....,„„ .4,,,„,,......, ,,,,,,,,,, SEPI ,.............., ....... ,,,..„„.„...............4.,...„ ENGINEERING & 1Pat CONSTRUCTION Figure 1 : Project Vicinity Project Vicinity Alligator Rivet National Vlildlae Refuge STIP B-2500 SAV WAVEBREAK Dare County INSPECTION AND SCOUR MEASURMENTS Bombing Range DARE COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA t,; May 2017 .dt init.. N W �E 1 S SAV Wavebreak Site Source:Bing Maps Figure Date:04/05/2017 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Feet