NCDOT 32-93 Amended SR 1103 Shelter Creek

, Permit Class Permit Number
I AMENDED 32-93 '
'STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment,Health&Natural Resources '
and
Coastal Resources Commission (j) P ! '"t'"'?r"W...@...L.;,...1 .
-1
•
' hermit i iR 0 1 1993 + ' ! ,ji) ,
for VCrV
x Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern ...--
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118 .
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
• Issued to N.C. Dept. of Transportation, Div. of Highways, P.O. Box 25201 ,. Raleigh, NC 27611
• authorizing development in Ons l ow County a Shelter Creek the SR1103 crossing north of /
Holly Ridge acrequested in the rmittee's application dated 9/2/92 including '
attached workplan drawings, sheets 1-3 of 3 dated 8/92.
.
This permit,issued on March 30, 1993 , is subject to compliance with the application(where consistent
with the permit),all applicable regulations,special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to a fine,imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
/
/ 1) Fill associated with widening of roadway approaches shall be immediately
• stabilized with vegetation or riprap. Any riprap used in construction
• should be clean and free of sediment and chemical contaminants.
• 2) Strict erosion and sedimentation controls shall be implemented to prevent
• any discharge of sediment from the project site into Shelter Creek. ,
Erosion control structures shall be maintained until all disturbed areas
• have been revegetated. Such revegetation should occur as soon as
• possible following completion of excavation and fill activities. ,
/ 3) Silt fencing shall be installed along toe-of-bank disposal sites.
/ 4) Under no circumstances shall material excavated from abutement areas be
/ discarded in stream or wetland habitat, on or offsite.
. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) 0
• This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the '
' other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. '
' issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work •
' initiation or continuance, as the case may be. .
• This permit must be accessible on-site to Department ( s
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. r `�s . -
, Any maintenance work or project modification not Roger cheerer, Direct
, covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval. ivision of Coastal Management
' All work must cease when the permit expires on This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
• December 31 , 1996
, In issuing this permit,the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
a
Coastal Management Program. Signature of Permittee

AM!
roxoo
/
/
i /
NC Dept. of Transportation
Permit #32-93 /
Page 2 of 2
/
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS /
/ /
5) Excavated areas should be restored to natural grade prior to
/revegetation.
/ /
/ I
NOTE: The Division of Environmental Management approved this
/ /
project under General Water Quality Certification No. 2675. t
/
/
4
/
/
/
i
/
f
// /
/
/
/
I
I
i
i
I
/
/
/
/
/
�.�. o �oxoxoxo�ti.v o.No�.

3Z-q3
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENTT M
mr."'"------)
127 Cardinal Drive Extension O
Wilmington, NC 28405 3 MAR 6 2 1993 ';
(919) 395-3900
L U'U'L:i)
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Parker, Jr. /Prestono P. Pate, Jr.
FROM: Haskell S. Rhett /V1l
SUBJECT: Opinion on Consistency/CAMA— Dredge & Fill Application/
NC DOT (Bridge 185) /Applicant proposes replacement of
existing bridge/SR 1103 Shelter Creek, Bridge 185/
Onslow County
DATE: February 26, 1993
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. My
opinion is based on my review of the permit application, the field
investigation report, and my understanding and interpretation of
the policies presented in the Onslow County Land Use Plan Update
(1991) .
The area known as the Great Sandy Run Pocosin is shown on the
Onslow County Land Classification Map as Conservation. This is a
rather huge chunk of real estate which the County has recognized as
worthy of some level of protection. Conservation classified lands
in Onslow County are, according to Land Use Plan policy,
developable with no other special restrictions than those which are
already in place and administered by local, state, and federal
agencies. The fact that this proposed bridge replacement is
located in an area classified Conservation is important as a
recognition by County officials that this area is environmentally
sensitive.
Transportation improvements are interpreted by this reviewer to be
desirable according to plan policy. Anticipated long-term negative
impacts are not expected as a result of this development activity.
The proposed project seems consistent with the Land Use Plan.
NCDOT135.PRT