NCDOT 15-96 SR 1160 (Potecasi Creek)

�,roxox^y ,
• Permit Class Permit Number ,
• NEW 15-96 '
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA /
Department of Environment,Health&Natural Resources '
and /
Coastal Resources Commission
! trmtt z MI%
f / for PC
C
x ��eve�ent,in an� f Environmental Concern C;C��`O°�r° ti. ;
purstladtt to 1 lCOS �13A-1 1 g R� ��.;Q��t •
Excavation an?I/6r filling pur§�iant to: S 113-229 ���`�
-- NC-DOT,-Div.-of Highways,-P.O.-Bb�52017,R i ,-NC--27611 - - . �.- -
' Issued to `�
Hertford e si Creek at the SR1160 cro
' authorizing development in County at /
/
. , as requested in the permittee's application dated 12/14/95 including attached
.
workplan drawings, sheets 1-5 of 5 dated 9/21/95.
, This permit. issued on /.7 i ,is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine,imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
/
Construction Timing
.
. $
1. a. In order to protect the spawning of anadramous species such as herring and alewife and
, resident species, no in-water construction or debris removal may take place between ,
February 15 and June 30 of any year without prior approval of the DCM in consultation ,
with the DMF and the WRC.
.
' b. Alternatively the DOT may request limited in-stream work with the use of sediment '
curtains but not positioned so as to block fish passage.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) /
.
' This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the '
' other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. /
' issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work '
' initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
• This permit must be accessible on-site to Department /,, , --.,>�
• personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Ittger N. Schecter, Director '
, Any maintenance work or project modification not Division of Coastal Management '
• covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
' All work must cease when the pennit expires on This permit and its conditions are hereby acce ted.
December 31, 1999
. ,
, In issuing this permit,the State of North Carolina agrees
/2 _ Y, ,
, that your project is consistent with the North Carolina ,
, Coastal Management Program. Signature of Permittee '
-a re oxoxo oxa oxoxoxe

/ /
/ NC DOT - Bridge 29, Hertford Permit #15-96 /
/ Page 2 of 2
/
/ •! I IONAL• CONDITIONS /
/ 2. The temporary placement or do l? in cavated or fill materials within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorize
,./2 /
3. No excavated or fill material will be places -at, yt' y vegetated wetlands or surrounding /
waters outside of the alignment of the fill area- dick n the work plaf(s).- - - /
' 4. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control ' s, measures, or structures shall be used to /
prevent sediment from entering the adjacent wetlands/watercourses/property (e.g., silt fence,
/ diversion swales/berms, sand fence, etc.). /
/ /
/ Navigational Clearance /
/ /
/
5. The horizontal and vertical navigational clearances of the proposed structure must be /
equal to or greater than the present structure.
/ NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved this project under General /
/ Permit No. 198200031. /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
•
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /

1 � c
17..01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O.BOX 25201,RALEIGH,N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
December 7, 1995
Mr. David W. Moye, Field Representative
N.C. Department of Environment, Health.
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 2188
Washington, N.C. 27889-2188
Dear Mr. Moye
Re: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 29 on SR 1160 in Hertford County
On/about September 29, 1995 the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) submitted a CAMA Major Development Permit application for the proposed
replacement of bridge# 29 in Hertford County. A permit was required, because
Potecasi Creek; at the site of bridge # 29, was determined to be a Public Trust Water
Area of Environmental Concern per Administrative Code Subchapter 7H.0207.
On October 13, 1995 the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) returned the
application due to discrepancies in the information provided. Corrections have been
made to the application as recommended in DCM's October 13th letter. The revised
MP-1 and MP-5 applications and accompanying drawings are attached. Riparian
landowner notification verifications are also provided.
It is requested that this revised application be processed as soon as possible to
enable the Bridge Maintenance program to upgrade the existing, functionally obsolete
structure in the near future.
If you have any questions or comments please call Mr. M. Randall Turner at
[phone] (office), or at [phone] (cell phone).
Sincerely
/7
27
H. ranklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt

Page 2
December 7, 1995
Mr. Moye
Enclosures
cc: John Parker, Permit Coordinator, DCM
Jimmy Lee, P.E., Bridge Maintenance Unit
D.R. Conner, P.E., Division Engineer
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
b. City, town, community or landmark
Approx. 4 miles south of Murfreesboro
a. Landowner:
c. Street address or secondary road number
Name N. C. Department of Transportation SR 1160
Address P.O. Box 25201 d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
City Raleigh State N.0
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone[phone] creek,sound,bay)Potecasi Creek
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent: 3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Name H. Franklin Vick,P.E.,Mgr.,P&E Branch
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
Address P.O. Box 25201 building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
City Raleigh State N.C. Replace existing timber bridge with new concrete
bridge
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone[phone]
Fax [phone] b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project,new work, or both? both
c. Project name(if any)Replacement of Bridge#29 c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use?Public Transportation
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
and/or project name. construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Public Transportation: Highway
crossing of Potecasi Creek; Standard Construction
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED Methodologies
PROJECT
a. County Hertford

Form DCM-MP-1
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
b. Size of individual lot(s)N/A wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MEW or Surface runoff from bridge and approachways
NWL+/-El 20 ft(USGS);+/- 100 ft assumed datum
d. Soil type(s)and texture(s)of tract o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Mapped as Bibb Soils; mucky inclusions N/A
•
e. Vegetation on tract Maple, gum, ash, cypress
swamp forest
f. Man-made features now on tract Timber bridge 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use In addition to the completed application form, the
plan.) following items must be submitted:
X Conservation Transitional • A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
Developed Community other instrument under which the applicant claims
X Rural Other title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
h. How is the tract zoned by local government? forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
Rural-agricultural which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No • An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been ink on an 8 1/2" by 11"white paper. (Refer to Coastal
done for the tract? _ Yes X No Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
If yes, by whom? description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
k. Is the project located in a National Registered only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
Historic District or does it involve a National prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
Register listed or eligible property? adequate number of quality copies are provided by
Yes X No applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
Coastal(marsh) Other X requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? *No guideagency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
(Attach documentation, if available) *See attached memo to
COE

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
IA Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary. 6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
IA list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and I understand that any permit issued in response to this
signed return receipts as proof that such owners application will allow only the development described in
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided. activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
Name Smithfield Carroll's Farm conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Address P. O. Box 1240
Phone Waverly, Virginia 23890 I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
Name R. Jennings &Annie P. White, Jr. review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
Address P.O. Box 147 connection with evaluating information related to this
Phone Conway,N.C. 27820 permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
Name W.L. Simons&Agnes R. Simons Heirs
Address 412 N. Colony Ave. I further certify that the information provided in this
Phone Ahoskie,N.C. 27910 application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit This is the I4 day of Jec , 19) .
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
Print Name H. Franklin Vick. P.E. Q--�
None J)
Signature
Landowner or Authorized Agent
• A check for S250 made payable to the Department of
Environment. Health, and Natural Resources Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the project.
application.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in DCM MP-3 Upland Development
oceanfront and inlet areas. DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
• A statement of compliance with the N.C. DCM MP-6 Marina Development
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement space provided at the bottom of each form.
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM,MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
proposed project. removed?(Explain)
1. BRIDGES g. Length of proposed bridge 175 ft
h. Width of proposed bridge 24 ft CW; +i- 27 ft R-R*
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge(construction material) +/-4.6 ft
Concrete-Prestressed cored slab *R-R denotes rail-to-rail
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Potecasi Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL +/- 11 ft.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? +/- 5.0 ft
X Yes No 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
If yes, reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(1) Length of existing bridge 156 ft. opening? X Yes No
(2) Width of existing bridge 17.1 ft CR* If yes, explain Existing bridge has 2 spans @ 17 ft
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing 6 in and 6 spans @ 20 ft;proposed bridge has 3
bridge +/- 5.0 ft spans @ 50 ft and 1 @ 25 ft, therefore navigational
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be width is increased. Vertical clearance remains
removed? (Explain) Entire existing bridge unchanged
will be removed
* m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
CR denotes clear roadway no navigable waters? Yes X No
f Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
—
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above concerning their approval?
the MEW or NWL Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.

•
Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS J• Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No N/A
If yes,explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
N/A
b. Number of culverts proposed N/A 3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
c. Type of culvert(construction material. style) a. Will theplacement of the proposed bridge
N/A P P or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? yes,
Yes No N/A (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(2) Width of existing bridge yards
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge b. Will the placement of the proposed brid
ge or culvert
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be require any excavation within: No
removed?(Explain) _Coastal Wetlands_ SAVs_Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No N/A (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert any re q require
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL X Yes No
If yes,
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be (1) Length of area to be excavated +/-20 ft
removed?(Explain)
(2) Width of area to be excavated +/-40 ft
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/-200 cu yds
f. Length of proposed culvert N/A d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation,please complete the following:
g. Width of proposed culvert N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the Upland site to be determined
MHW or NWL N/A (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? s
Yes No N/A (3) Do y yoou c cllaim title to the disposal area?
If yes, explain Yes No see d. (1)
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.

Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
maintenance? Yes No see d.(1) any existing utility lines? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal If yes, explain in detail None anticipated
wetlands(marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above. see d. (1) c. Will the proposed project require the construction
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below of any temporary detour structures?
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 If yes, explain in detail None anticipated
above. see d. (1)
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
(2) Width of area to be filled and erosion controlled? Stringent application of
(3) Purpose of fill NCDOT's BMPs for the Protection of Surface
Waters
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert f. What type of construction equipment will be used
result in any fill (other than excavated material (for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
described in Item d. above)to be placed within: dredge)? Backhoe, crane, trucks, etc.
_Coastal Wetlands SAVs_Other Wetlands
If yes, No
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
(3) Purpose of fill to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
If yes, require any shoreline stabilization?
(1) Length of area to be filled +/-40 ft X Yes No
(2) Width of area to be filled +/-40 ft If yes, explain in detail Stone rip-rap will be used on
(3) Purpose of fill Top dress shoulders near all slopes greater than 2:1
end bents
4. GENERAL NCDOT H. Frankl , P. .
App or oject N
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
iQ ature
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail ! y /� 9..5
Date

Hertford County
•
1A5��`1�I ,S
4%41 )
• -�K r 17p
�;. , -,--._._cr Crossroads" .,f.f a
I • g�+ • i 11eo
I . hP .�•` ;1101 y
'•k
,)r, uoi ' L7 I. 1 • P
Z o 1207 •� +V 1)04 aS'_l "99 l ItA6atREE'dit 1. 4 r't`� i ' is 1 -1 \
A. 3..Z.\ \ / JJl 6
. .. , .._,.s.,,,.,. ,J,.,,.. -litil_ NI •: pp/ 1.6
P h�1 � /
c Y
i ,, ,N 1 1A
i7Q)
1177
V 1174 + , 111E1 •• ^' Ise L] \
I 'f Ilw •
•
e
7 re► I .0 I Ma; on
III) ?hi: '0 1`n,e • /
e J] •• k• . " �'y �� '0 5 f 1
' I.. 11.61 /1B. \ /Ilp , e
I IM
' I GkY a v�
I Ilk, •x. ,I tw `1, O A P, \ =1107 r: i7i) f,7• 1(W'NT�3, 11L!
J ® ,\ BAN' r,, ' .a
7:— Ls ,. 1 vh IIn .00 ,
r �
Isle
1112 �' IA I ufs
0� a` , e� * rt F .
0,. 'f ^'%t,a' , )) • '.,1 viib es. a .:: .,
4.w ) `0J nor o f
1.7 110I `e hlf .1\1. '^ ,17. •. , 1441 Y
1141 lknt j e 1fie e.,• Io � COfIEl0
.,o UAL =�. California 0, L. Ioe..e
,1f1 •, ,5.el tui r;
• ,. 'I'—
7A
t 1 ` �Li �� b ~..C'ry'k J I 0 Iloe I,)f 1►b �Meo,oni Flom
f1.W Ike e, 11R \, ! 11)7 . ^ Irv?
77 • IMnolo',I . I II Il41 I1�7 ;� `''" PA
11 uli') i.��. le,--—. Plat ft•� 1.07 1 1.14
.s /__ t� 401 Li . i
JI
North Carolina
•
Department ofl'ralisportation
Division of Highways
County: Hertford
Quad: Union
l3asln: Chowan
Ash ���m�' • �i Project: Replace Bridge 4 29 on
400 �8 0 ��r� �r ~ SR 1160 Over Potecasi Creek
r��lir�j i�i�•�►+�j!��t6/+�" Date: 09 i 21 /95
a��jwa� 1 Viclntty Ma
�f . Sheet 1 of 5

LEG-END . .
GI µ/.(.. S.r,e...ss, N_,es 4. c
L /dies 4. s.r1....fs. i efes L t AL.
— — — — EX_?.S1EQG EoP 4 1z 4- CO3o uy A vE. .51�1141$1 P
_ . . , — ,.,_ p)A.i�R'S =ccE �ao�Kic, NG
:1�� PENorrs Hic 1, g.lcAvniiO4. . Z"i 9Ho . :
— Rou1 qs 10478 `L'
FoTECP i CRk. / / . 3e50, ie 25 ,
0 fl PRE.SIRE'.SSEDCor:OSLPR C `
10 eftand bout v y `(/ 90° SKE k' �� . -t.
PRoPosra Ek=cT= _ R Y d aROW
oW
WiErAftalemeil,
.� = _-T=-r----- =--1= - -r - - —i — —
I
I
I
Z L� L _ d = - - - —.A.--�_- -�-t—- ---_ T
W. L.S•,+ou 5. N CI¢54,
1 , to i AG►+Ls R. S.�o.,S.
Ft
EI".S. . AL.
=�.,. C fr ' r ' - rrr D
P1.
Qb S+r1 A r1 boo ndArr/ ,� -.. W�(d t� �iM �'
- ALL
j,D - acarq� a_
D l gip RAP A - ��•,—�
SrEEP=R -*IAN V .
•
a 3 ? a� a y C
I14/
o A R —
C`.! C7
Ise � xib o o. zd�
U
a =..-n x`ro ��O
go
m � H-OO �Z�-aoScAL E l —50 /10P- 7.
Q

,
NN.
vxwi,
a,- \ psiruoà
t'imtAi0e0W

•
•
S,-, iTN FIELD C.a22 Lot_..'S FA2rt
LEGENDP.o. Box IZ • -cc
— - - — — -- — EYIsTT►1G EOP wAvERL-r, vA aq�
�t z.3.
-- • ' . —* , ' — . . . V1AirR '5 E1 G- /
0 Tl<aF 9400 = p Q• T,
( • f-N
__-. Roue - Po rE cA.5 r C k T K.
SCALT J�1-50' / — Z YARD V,
a .
-‘-.›.%----•.,
% .15, ••••. ---------) . GY1, . :)
Ro V s, , _ ROW "I'-M¢1•4
6r).,i— Lr9
-�ioSR ►►4? NJ3°30, ` . _ __- - - I 2a' A5 . — — — —
ROW — Wed 6As •~' . -- - 2
Rey o , .C37, b ,. (f::=,7Q
7 oV. ef3'i c=7
0• 1E,.1,..� "_.3t:.S t� '1 s7L, 3-2
P . 13ox. 147 V
tP.
�+ I--
1u < = ? a = • ZteZo Woo Ds z
d
" t , ,D o o -
4 ( o
v � 2 o $ ; s
•
o
td• a Yin
(p N •
. m
'4 o = ( j r
4. � 1
1
1
x 06 ^ i co QT � qT OQ

•
21:JtJ
\Ar*A" ifogt
rsicomf-, - — -- • - WoR
• tttn164-3W
lell1611446

(0A-iUM iS ASSLtMV) E1 Cif,, LEGEND
Sc A E . !"-,S0' No R�-Z,
I"- 10' V ER T ,
WI rzr ) (J.,
N6 LTA,_
\,. - i_1
— -!
FM DEt✓ S oT gicN Cr4vv,►/D C.fc4v4TroA/ 1 1
�z J
I I I q
"kW 8400 9--00
C DATu0A IS P:S. W1Eb ELEV C W!J GgADE ,,- r /0 -72 -L- 1—
ExiSTI1Ja AREA 1y505 .-f EL.Ey
4. 1Oo- 6� 0�1 ,06% GR. 3 vS0' - — N
a , /«e 2S (gt.-M.55ED COR�O y P.g 8�2O
Pitopos:D AA=A 1`1S2 .f4- 1'srcPai D 6t�Da� - 90SKES`! -
100 _ .. - . -- ExY r ii; b i1GE v
I. /00
ScA) C. 1`" i i
1 "_50, N ER . ; I 1 I I — 1 - -- . - —-- -- -
u v RT ' ( � •
' • - - - - 1 -1- I I. I ••ice -%•' ' •- �_� — ���-
cn 'ti t7 'si so ,p 0 I I 1
� A � yv � 90 .
'o y c- o N,G,LE.�`I"
WS (8146 I-
CD p o = I�G•R1G`i i .�Z. 93.y
"' g � a -,C LEGEND
. 41
0. o
_,,., - R N G R.T
s 7
T .)O+00 • 1 4 00 lZ-1-0 13+00

•
ScA L = 1 = to zt z (DA%uM ELEV. IJ Ass4111E_D)
--- - - _ .' "' v� i�E�Q7• P-7A beNotes Upia,Md ,,/
PROP/3SE ) GUD . -
'I 2• I
90 110LT • 30 t..T 20 LT 10 LT 0 : roAT 20 RT 30 RT /0RT
- - — SEciivy A -4
Scat E I��_` KY i-Io,e�z, (DATUM ELE'/ Xs A_%5to;:t)
/ ''= 10' VEpr.
,p
17-________---
rRaP�.S=O 6 RA GE
1u oa. ,n'r ?.ti o o <
� H: z
moo " -
=; . - .
a
� 1 I I l I I a I
o a
i t2 w g.
E. 0 S 3017 ZO LT /0 LT 0 /O RT 20 R 7- 30 R T /0 RT
c.
SEc7Ja / .45-4
.1
1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Ar•
Division of Coastal Management
wIrr
• James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor G
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
Roger N. Schecter, Director
February 13, 1996
Mr. Barney J. O'Quinn
NC Dept. of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Sir:
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where
applicable, the State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff-
colored form) is retained by you and it must be available on site when the project is inspected for compliance.
Please sign both the original and the copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed envelope. Signing
the permit and proceeding means you have waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you may request a hearing pursuant to NCGS 113A-
121.1 or 113-229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance with NCGS Chapter 150B with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 11666, Raleigh, NC 27611, [phone] within twenty (20)
days of this decision on your permit. You should also be aware that if another qualified party submits a valid
objection to the issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days, the matter must be resolved prior to work
initiation. The Coastal Resources Commission makes the final decision on any appeal.
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work must
be carried out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future maintenance require
additional approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review all project plans, as
approved. If you are having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to be sure that he fully
understands all permit requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we request
that you complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if questions arise
concerning permit conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact Department personnel
at any time for assistance. By working in accordance with the permit, you will be helping to protect our vitally
important coastal resources.
Very sincerely,
c \5)
John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/amw
Enclosure
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: N. C. Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Hertford County on SR 1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek
near Murfreesboro, North Carolina
Photo Index - 1989: N/A 1984: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,562,600 Y: 958,200
Union Quad. (upper left corner)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 10/11/95 4/3/95
Was Applicant Present - NO NO
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 12/15/95
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Hertford County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation (water, wetlands) Rural (land)
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other ±800 ft2
Highground
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 0.02 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: NO
(F) Water Classification: C-NSW Open: NO
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace an existing ±17' wide by ±156' long
bridge with a ±27' wide by ±175' long bridge.

r
NC DOT Bridge #29
Hertford County
Project setting
The N. C. Department of Transportation (NC DOT) proposes to replace bridge #29
located on SR 1160 crossing Potecasi Creek south of Murfreesboro in Hertford County, North
Carolina. The existing bridge is ±17' wide and ±156' long and is a one lane bridge. The bridge
is bordered on the downstream (south) side by an approximately 50' wide cut over woodland area
for aerial transmission line right-of-way. This cut over area is vegetated with various wetland
plant species which give way to upland grasses on the road shoulder. Adjacent the cut over area
on the downstream side are wooded wetlands on both sides of the creek. The upstream (north)
side of the site is bordered by wooded wetland on both sides of the creek. The creek is ±126'
wide at the bridge crossing and the vertical clearance under the existing bridge is ±5'. Potecasi
Creek which is classified as C-NSW by the Environmental Management Commission.
Project description
NC DOT proposes to replace an existing ±17' wide by ±156' long bridge with an
approximately 27' wide by ±175' long bridge. The existing bridge which has 7 bents will be
removed and replaced with a new bridge which has 3 bents. Approximately 800 ft2 of high
ground (existing approach fill) will be removed which will increase the horizontal opening under
the bridge from ±156' to ±175'. The existing vertical clearance of ±5' will remain the same.
Anticipated impacts
The project as proposed would result in the excavation of ±800 ft2 of high ground. The
existing bridge has a navigable opening between existing bents of ±20' wide with a vertical
clearance of ±5'. The proposed bridge will have a opening of ±50' wide with a vertical
clearance of ±5' which will enhance navigability while maintaining the existing vertical clearance.
The existing bridge width of ±17' will be increased with the new bridge to ±28'. Localized
turbidity would occur as a result of the construction activities.
David W. Moye - Washington Office - 18 December 1995

APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL/PROCESSING RECORD
15-9�
A)- Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation County: Hertford
Location of Project: On SR 1160 at Bridge No. 29 over Potecasi Creek near Murfreesborc
Date Application Received Complete by Field: 15 December 1995
Field Recommendation: Attached X To be Forwarded
Consistency Determination: Attached To be Forwarded X
/
Field Representative: u� 1D. Mo e L, - trict Office: Washington
District Manager Rev' �. ell �/ f!'
gi 1 °.).9 reI
B) Date Application Received in ' . e\ : .�JA13� 'IN Fee Rec'd: $
tiot 4 ,Ai
Oar`Public Notice Rec'd: ' '-'4 �:Fy► of Notice Date:
Adj . Rip. Prop Notices Rec'd: ittniq / Deed Rec'd:
Application Assigned to: .- 'act\ikct on \7. - S,p-.'A$-
C) 75 Day Deadline: .2. .Z e-9'6 150 Day Deadline:
Mail Out Date: State Due Date:
Federal Due Date: Fed. Comments Rec'd on C`� `y vt^ ;�
Permit Final Action: Issue Deny Draft on \- .5--`:11,0
D) AGENCY DATE COMMENTS OBJECTIONS NOTES
RETURNED YES NO
Coastal Management District Office ( 1
Division of Comm. Assistance VI _ -2_--1 -9 S
Land Quality Section 1 2 -Z7 -ys L/
Div. of Env. Management c'�� `�
State Property Office
Div. of Archives & History % 9
Div. of Env. Health - 7 6
Div. of Highways _ 1 , n
/ oC 7
Wildlife Resources Commission ,-41 -ii r� cv..., rw
Div. of Water Resources I _Z _ 2.-n 5-_ V
Div. of Marine Fisheries ' . _tit c
' - rva,.-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 • •
• Division of Coastal Management 74
James B. Hunt, Jr., r ry p E H N F
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker
FROM: David Moye
DATE: 18 December 1995
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge #29, Hertford County Application
The proposed project appears consistent with the rules found in Subchapter 7H.0207
concerning development in Public Trust Areas. The proposed bridge will result in the removal
of 4 bents from the Potecasi Creek by going from the existing 7 down to 3. The existing
horizontal clearance for navigation will increase from ±20' to ±50'. The existing vertical
clearance of 5' will remain unchanged. If the permit is issued I would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the permit;
CONDITIONS
1. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters
or vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
- 2. No excavated or fill material will be placed at anytime in any vegetated wetlands or
surrounding waters outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the work plat(s).
3. Prior"'any construction activity a silt curtain will be installed below the project site and
will remain until 24 hours after the project has been completed.
4. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control devices, measures, or structures shall be
used to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent wetlands/watercourses/property (e.g.,
silt fence, diversion swales/berms, sand fence, etc.).
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Lib
MEMORANDUM REC l`�
JAN is,E--
TO: David Moye 96
t4NAGW MEI,t
OM: John Crew
c9
DATE: December 28, 1995 = '- _....._.
SUBJECT: DOT Replacement of Existing Bridges, #42 Over Swain Mill Creek on State Road
1441 and#29 Over Potecasi Creek on SR 1160 With New Bridges-Hertford
County
Both of these proposals involve replacing existing bridges with new, wider and longer
bridges at the above-referenced sites. Both involve PTA, AEC's and each proposal comes under
the auspices of the CRC certified July 1991, Hertford County LUP update.
The plan offers the following limited guidance on proposals of this type:
* County policy on hazardous and fragile areas (Page 40-41) note the county
supports"the permitting process of state or federal agencies for fragile areas,
including 404 wetlands." (Much discussion on AEC's and their importance is
noted on pages 6-7 in the data collection and analysis section of the plan).
* County policy on commitment to state and federal programs (page 48) notes the
county believes"highway improvements are of particular concern in areas where
peak traffic loads create a burden on the system. While supporting all state and
federal regulations, the county has no additional polices related to these issues."
The landward portions of both of these sites is shown in the Rural Land Class on the
county's land classification map (page 65). This class (page 64) notes an agarian landscape where
limited urban type services are available. The waterward portion of these proposals is by
definition(as AEC')located in the Conservative Land Class (page 64-65). The county has not
develope any use or performance standards, for the conservation class,which exceed minimum
state criteria for development in AEC's.
My opinion is if these proposals can be accomplished in accordance with applicable AEC
and 404 standards, they will not be inconsistent with the county's 1991 Certified Land Use Plan.
CC: Preston Pate
inn Parker

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
• Health and Natural Resources 46,,TgrxiA
• Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
19 December 1995DEC
MEMORANDUM 2 0 1995
TO: Mr. Bruce L. Freeman, Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1160 at Bridge No. 29, Hertford County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing 17' wide by 156' long bridge with a 27' wide by
175' long bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 9 January 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Moye at 946-6481, Ext 298. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
is requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed tti,.,--(��t.c4A4-0-4-) Date 7 ]—`i D
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

. State of North Carolina
• Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1
r A
Division of Marine FisheriesI r
w
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor •-c 1 E) E 1--IJonathan B. Howes, Secretary g
Bruce L. Freeman, Director nativE-D
ico JAN AS 1996
MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM:
t9 cu
f
TO: John R. Parker, Jr., DCM Major Permits Processing Coordinator
THROUGH: Maury Wolff, Permit Coordinator
FROM: Sara E. Winslow, Biologist Supervisoj��►�/
SUBJECT: NC DOT - Bridge No. 29 Replacement Hertford County - SR 1160
DATE: 21 December 1995
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries are
provided pursuant to General Statute 113-131.
Potecasi Creek functions as a spawning and nursery area for blueback herring and
alewife. Resident species, both of commercial and recreational importance, also utilize this area.
V The Division would request a moratorium for any inwater construction activities. The
requested time period is 15 February through 31 May. This will ensure the environmental
integrity of the area is protected during crial times-of usage by the previously mentioned
species.
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A74;1•11:7A
Dfvfsion of Coastal Management
James Hunt, Jr . (a.� �; NJ FR
Jonathan B, Howes
AiryAiryes
Roger N. Schecter.
December 20, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Charles R. Fuliwood, Jr., Director
Wildlite Resources Commission
Attn: Habitat Conservation Program
FROM: 1ohn Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJEC U- CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
ROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed and return this form
by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
\ _ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in tr%,-
�-7 / ached comments.
Signed — --- Date i
May 21, 1993
27687.Paieigh, North Carcline)27611-7687 Teloph.)r.o 91 - 293 FM 919.733-i4Q5
An Equcl Opportunity Alfltm.at:ve Acton Employer 509E recyc.ac';' ' ccn 'rn©r Dope-

IPIPICF. , FHLL — . =' la.-, ,_' 11 . 71 ;.,c, . - _ F .
•
' r! .r* a ` .'
1.•ttL...,--. . ' •-- . ' ; - --...0.1: 404, , * ":7-- '
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission : _
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3.391
Charles R. Fullwood,Executive Director
MEN 10R l_VTDUM
I t John R. Parker, Jr., Coordinator
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management, DEHNR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Co Mat
I lahitat Conservation Program ._ -r- , ��,�,.%
IIDATE: January 9, 1996
SUBJECT: CAMA/Drcdge and Fill Permit Application for NC DOT bridge project on SR
1160 at bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford County.
Staff biologists with the Wildlife Resources Commission have completed a review of the
et with regards to associated impacts on wildlife and fisheries resources in the area, Our
. i unents are provided in accordance with provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act
i,Ci.S. 1 I3A-100 through 113A-128). and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act t48 Stat. 401, as
an;,;nded: 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.),
The applicant proposes to replace bridge #29 located on SR 116( th,rd County, with
another spanning structure. Bridge #29 is located over2Potecasi Creek, "i he proposed project
would result in the excavation of approximately 800 ft of high ground. Potecasi Creek is
classified as class C, and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW) by the Environmental a lanagernert
Commission.
The shallow water habitat in Potecasi Creek is used by numerous ,,p, ' _>t aeshwater
fish as spawning, rearing, feeding and escape areas. Increased turbidity in tL.. i reds results in
the destniction of spawning habitat, and greatly diminishes egg and fry sur t, To avoid
adverse impacts to spawning populations of inland fish species at the project site, we will not
object to the project as proposed if in-water work is not conducted between March 1 and
September 30.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide input into this permit application r-; ,
need further information on these comments, please contact me at [phone]

State of North Carolina 513Q5
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • WA
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary xy � f p E FAN R
Roger N. Schecter, Director ✓ ff'�F o
119
ei9�9'•�
r ' r:Ec/l,'EQ wasH,NGTON OFFICE
t ore
MEMORANDUM 2 .> 1995 C�;,
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., DirectorN(Ro�� NrAZS�%ENcFS A Z
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
DEC 2! 1995
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
WA TR_:
Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1160 at Bridge No. 29, Hertford County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing 17' wide by 156' long bridge with a 27' wide by
175' long bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 9 January 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Moye at 946-6481, Ext 298. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
is requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed Date l0
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Dal Ilil;. _ �y.. _'ir=i-- -_i'`i"..�_ ?,1� '9-, _ -
T `
State of North Carolina q5I3Q-S
'Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources j •
Division of Coastal Management
ma-
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
19 December 1995
pi:cr;rvEO
MEMORANDUM DEC 2 199S C;:;;
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, PE., Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
Qf,
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1160 at Bridge No. 29, Hertford County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing 17' wide by 156' long bridge with a 27' wide by
175' long bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 9 January 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Moye at 946-6481, Ext 298. When'appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
is requested.
REPLY This office'has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office'ihas no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office: objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed r'.Q' __. Date �`1
I i
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone]! FAX [phone]
�.E4uaI Opportunity Affirmative Action Empicyer I &%recycle.:'ID%pot ::.'r eLrier pap x

State of North Carolina
• Department of Environment,
- Health and Natural Resources ArA
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr., Governor
ry p EE H N F
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
20 December 1995 ,' JEO i j
2 40
I DEC
c
MEMORANDUM MPNAGMENt
w
TO: Mr. William McNeil, Director 9 ��
Division of Community Assistance
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1441 at Bridge No. 42 over Swain Mill Creek, Hertford County,
North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace an existing 22' wide by 69' long bridge with a 28' wide by
105' long bridge
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 19 January 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Moye at 946-6481, Ext 298. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
is requested.
N.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
his office objects to the project for reasons described in the
tached comments.
Signed Date 2 I )0-t-
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
. Department of Environment,
• Health and Natural Resources / • •
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr., r ry p E 1--IN F�
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
!.12
19 December 1995 ;\�`` 4.
ra
1;ct DEC21199' av
cg
MEMORANDUM ,-a ��1
latuali
TO: Mr. Charles Gardner, Director \�
Division of Land Resources
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N.C. Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1160 at Bridge No. 29, Hertford County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing 17' wide by 156' long bridge with a 27' wide by
175' long bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 9 January 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Moye at 946-6481, Ext 298. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
is requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
/
�/ This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the
_Attached comments.
Signed �� Date /2-
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources AlirrrA
Division of Coastal Management
' •
James B. Hunt,Jr.,Governor �C
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 20, 1995 Yv 11�,
iECEIVEO
MEMORANDUM JAN ,2 1996 3
MANAGEMENT
TO: Mr. Larry R. Goode, Phd., P.E.
Highway.Administrator
Division of Highways 9 N
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data are requested.
REPLY '_/ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. --
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
atta ed c
Signed Date /aid- g 9
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

-4. ,
State of North Carolina
. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ATVA
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr., r ry E H N F l
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 20, 1995 ,? • (►4111 j I
►,
MEMORANDUM am 2919951
TO: Mn John Sutherland, Chief Mai at WIER RESOURCES
Water Planning Section
Division of Water Resources
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On ST1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed 7CL---(-- Date "// f/ 6
•
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

•
State of North Carolina
- Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ArricA
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr., Governor
�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 20, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Renee Gledhill-Early
Environmental Review Coordinator
Division of Archives and History
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. _
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
/
Signed , � - Date (/ �(1/44,
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
- Department of Environment,
iv /i Health and Natural Resources ATA.
Division of Coastal Management
ANNEMMmiik
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Fl
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 20, 1995
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Linda Sewall
Director
Division of Environmental Health
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #/ over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
PROPOSED PROTECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new, bridge.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project _in•.i return
this form by January 20, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed prof;_:.
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supports,
data are requested.
REPLY _ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. ..... t
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See a c . , , u,
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in :ne
attached comments.
Signed L • Date 7 z iP'f
Y1c :4 4Ga--' `"Pe;:f •-/7 •`` Q�r �
P > Box 27687.Raleigh.North Caro►ir.o '1-7! '' ►a}Noh rr ;:19 ;. FAX 91c 7Y2-'4'%
An Equal C.pr,-Drtun,ty Affirmative C'c' . • - . a-ru Fir

•
State of North Carolina
• Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Are
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr.,Governor
GO FAN F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director ,
December 20, 199 s!�✓ '�' `� ���< �5
£7c0 �ANiEI1/4-D . •
A 19y6
COGS )
MAMA DJENT r.r l
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Charles R. Fullwood, Jr., Directo e
Wildlife Resources Commission
Attn: Habitat Conservation Program
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
ROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed and return this form
by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
tached comments.
Signed --De Date / cf `T6
May 21, 1993
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

, ` -
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391
Charles R.Fullwood,Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Parker,Jr., Coordinator
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management, DEHNR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Co, • 6 c,,,,,,;(14/
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 9, 1996
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application for NC DOT bridge project on SR
1160 at bridge#29 over Potecasi Creek,Hertford County.
Staff biologists with the Wildlife Resources Commission have completed a review of the
project with regards to associated impacts on wildlife and fisheries resources in the area. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act
(G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to replace bridge#29 located on SR 1160, Hertford County, with
another spanning structure. Bridge#29 is located over2Potecasi Creek. The proposed project
would result in the excavation of approximately 800 ft of high ground. Potecasi Creek is
classified as class C, and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW)by the Environmental Management
Commission.
The shallow water habitat in Potecasi Creek is used by numerous species of freshwater
fish as spawning,rearing, feeding and escape areas. Increased turbidity in these areas results in
the destruction of spawning habitat, and greatly diminishes egg and fry survival. To avoid
adverse impacts to spawning populations of inland fish species at the project site, we will not
object to the project as proposed if in-water work is not conducted between March 1 and
September 30.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide input into this permit application review. If you
need further information on these comments,please contact me at(919) 528-9886.

Mirk
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ArrivrA
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt,Jr., Governor G Fl
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
1-11 Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 20, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Joe Henderson, Acting Director
State Property Office
Department of Administration
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: NC DOT
PROJECT LOCATION: On SR1160 at Bridge #29 over Potecasi Creek, Hertford Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To replace an existing bridge with a new bridge..
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by January 10, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
at ched comments.
Signed Date — U b
P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

s• �O� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
a�� \' WILMINGTON DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS '±' `
W 50 ',
P.O.BOX 1890 ,.a,o.,..
WILMINGTON,NORTH CAROLINA 28402 1890 . -••.1<"
`,W:,j REPLY TO n sn c.
ATTENTION OF
January 3, 1995
Regulatory Branch V.
9
Action ID No. 199601150 and General Permit No. 198200031 h + "a
rrECENEil t
co
CWJ AL
Mr. H. Franklin Vick MANAGEMENT r
N.C. Department of Transportation I%
,`
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 7
Dear Mr. Vick:
Through coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management, we have learned of your plans to replace NCDOT Bridge No. 29 over
Potecasi Creek, located on State Road 1160, near Murfreesboro, Hertford
County, North Carolina.
On January 1, 1992, we renewed general permit No. 198200031, (copy
enclosed) , that authorizes the placement of fill material associated with the
construction, repair, or replacement of bridges across navigable waters and
waters of the United States in North Carolina, including cofferdams,
abutments, foundation seals, piers, temporary construction and access fills,
approach fills, detour fills, and box culvert installation, as part of work
conducted by or in full compliance with the standards and specifications of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) .
Your proposed work is authorized if you can comply with all permit
conditions. Please read the enclosed permit to prevent an unintentional
violation of Federal law. As this Department of the Army general permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any other required approvals,
you should contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
If you have questions, please contact Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington Field
Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone (919) 975-1616.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Pnnted on �� Recycled Paper

J
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure) :
Mr. John Parker
V Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23705
Mr. Terry Moore
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division
of Coastal Management
Post Office Box 2188
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Mrs. Stephanie Briggs
NC Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • 4•
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
19 December 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E. , Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Vick:
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of an
application for State approval for development of property located on SR 1160 at
Bridge No. 29 over Potecasi Creek near Murfreesboro in Hertford County, North
Carolina. It was received on 15 December 1995 and appears to be adequate for
processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is 28
February 1996. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such
time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a
final action by the initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review
period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will also serve as your
notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on
or about the 75th day. Should there be any questions on this procedural change,
do not hesitate to contact me.
N.C.G.S. 113A-119(b) requires that notice of an application be posted at
the location of the proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of
Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at the property of your proposed
development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along your
property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be:
nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way
fronting your property, or at a point along the road right-of-way where a private
road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this notice could result
in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made and if additional information is
required, you will be contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency.
Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in writing if you wish
to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely,
David W. Moye
Field Representative
DWM:pdp
ENCLOSURE
1424 Carolina Avenue,Washington,North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Mulligan
Deborah Sawyer
FROM: David Moye-Vt'
DATE: 19 December 1995
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Permit and/or Dredge & Fill Permit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Bridge No. 29
Hertford County, North Carolina
Attached is an application for a CAMA Major and/or a Dredge & Fill permit which was
received by me on 15 December 1995. I am considering this application complete, have
acknowledged receipt, and have begun processing.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.

.
''..
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O.BOX 25201,RALEIGH,N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
December 7. 1995
Mr. David W. Moye, Field Representative
N.C. Department of Environment, Health.
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 2188
Washington, N.C. 27889-2188
Dear Mr. Moye
Re: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 29 on SR 1160 in Hertford County
On/about September 29, 1995 the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) submitted a CAMA Major Development Permit application for the proposed
replacement of bridge# 29 in Hertford County. A permit was required, because
Potecasi Creek, at the site of bridge # 29, was determined to be a Public Trust Water
Area of Environmental Concern per Administrative Code Subchapter 7H.0207.
On October 13, 1995 the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) returned the
application due to discrepancies in the information provided. Corrections have been
made to the application as recommended in DCM's October 13th letter. The revised
MP-1 and MP-5 applications and accompanying drawings are attached. Riparian
landowner notification verifications are also provided.
It is requested that this revised application be processed as soon as possible to
enable the Bridge Maintenance program to upgrade the existing, functionally obsolete
structure in the near future.
If you have any questions or comments please call Mr. M. Randall Turner at
[phone] (office), or at [phone] (cell phone).
Sincerely
/ 7/ Kid
H.ianklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
•
.p

Page 2
December 7; 1995
Mr. Moye
Enclosures
cc: John Parker, Permit Coordinator, DCM
Jimmy Lee, P.E., Bridge Maintenance Unit
D.R. Conner, P.E., Division Engineer
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer

14
okoid
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. Box 1405 SECRETARY
Elizabeth City,N.C. 27906-1405
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
December 7, 1995
•
Mr. Raleigh W. Bland, Regulatory Project Manager
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office •
P.O. Box 1000 •
Washington, N.C. 27889-1000
Dear Mr. Bland:
Re: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 29 on SR 1160 in Hertford County
I have enclosed a vicinity map and a site drawing for a proposed bridge
replacement in Hertford County. A CAMA Major Development Permit application has
been submitted (effective December 7, 1995) by the NCDOT. As designed, the project
will impact less than 0.1 acre of Section 404 wetlands. The wetland impacts are in the
vicinity of the proposed rip-rapped zones adjacent to the proposed end-bents.
I have visited the site on more than one occasion and have made a wetland
determination. The approximate upland-wetland boundary is depicted on sheets 1 and
2. The predominant community in the bridge study area is a swamp forest and fringe
wetlands associated with Potecasi Creek. Soils are mapped as Bibb and evidence of
saturation within the upper 12 inches for extended periods is apparent.
The Division of Coastal Management wants to insure that the wetland
boundaries in the project area have been properly determined, as evidenced by a COE
tear sheet, concurring with the field determination.
Please provide me with a tear sheet confirming that sheets 1 and 2 properly
depict the wetland boundaries in the bridge vicinity. Call me if you have any questions
or comments.
Sincerely,
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer
Division One
Attachments
cc: David W. Moye, DCM
0

12/18/95 13:23 ' 919 331 4739 NCDOT EC DIST 1 1h002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: County: cry r
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
r
Prapertyrn �(wist/Authorized Agent { • c L D e o1` 1 v Y1 t a y T"Ai 1 o v
p. 0 . Pt 5
Address 1 I fj�
C e--4 C► . th,,,4, �, . ai_cio,-- �os
jl � �
Telephone Number Oil) "331 — Loll
Size aqd Locatio of Property(w terbody,Highway name/number, town,etc.)
t � �a Le"Q.." of IVt it d. a9 ovt R 1160 i oue/ll e0-i-eGa51 Creek
h Y Kurf-re L-o i 144 f n-ti Go ar, ` 00 r EAr-b ti A q.
Indicate Which of the following apply:
• There a wetlands on a above describe roperty which we str ly suggest should delineated d
s yed. The sure ed wetland line ust be verified by o staff before the s will mak final
risdictional d rmination on yo property.
• Beca of the size our property an ur present worklo ,our identification an elineation of you
w nds cannot a accomplished i timely manner. Y may wish to employ onsultant to obt.'. a
ore timely ineation of the ands. Once your sultant has flagged a we nd line on the pr►•-rty,
Corps st will review it, an ,if it is accurate,we, ongly recommend that have the line su',eyed for
fins proval by the Co . The Corps will no ake a final jurisdictional etermination on .ur property
out an approve urvey. _
6E • The wetlands on your lot have been delineated,and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have been explained
to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed Via years from the date of this notification.
�-ivt�
• Ther are no wetia present on th above describe property which a subject tot permit
r irements of S ion 404 of the an Water Act SC 1344). UnI here is a cha a in the law
or our public regulations,thi etermination ma a relied upon for a eriod not to e ed three years
from the a of this notifica ' n.
R.,• The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of
Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the Army
permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A permit is
not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you have any
questiois re ardin the Form of Engineers regulatory program,please contact
Rale1 Bland at 111— q1r" 1L1L CG--. a.3) .
PropertrewitariAuthorized Agent,Signature
Project Manager Signature_ filic.4 _ '
Date t'a— I S— 15 Expiration Date II— I S— r7-000
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW(FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
CFSAW Form 566
1 OCT 92

• • 12/18/95 13:29 $919 331 9739 NCDOT EC DIST 1 U1003
a
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ,
Action ID. County 14ejTW {y.)
GENERAL PERMIT(REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/Agent &D O'T A'f-�N T . A , �� �j.�N
f
Address P. 0 . c 1 ') Al
U,D i\`ta_v,,s k ,C, �,789)
Telephone No. C 9'i 4) 7 9"a,"3 I/3,
Size and Location of project(wat rbody,road name/number,town,etc.) @ X.( a l 0P P�
O LP.r i s h ri t �� 5R i t r O r.P O S c l YI i Se
PO1•ec -S, Cr'P�K 1 @ 6, m l Lp� ne>~ &S� - d (it c ont :'
Description of Activity Pe &c e. e x A vA5 t o ri(Ot e. l ) yy ' QrPA 44 P
S I K1L GvIG .
LA��., 160 Ts ©6 rip s 12 JuX
Section 404(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)only.
Y
Section 10(River and Harbor Act of 1899)only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
!k P3 Regional General Permit or Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order,and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve the undersigned
permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,State,or local approvals/permits. The permittee
may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
By signature below, the permittee certifies an understanding and acceptance of all terms and conditions of this
permit.
Property Owner/Authorized Agent Signature
Regulatory Project Manager Signature vU
Date 6 -a - 9 S Expiration Da /'-d) 1 -9-7 .
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC.,MUST BE ATTACHED TO
THE YELLOW(FILE)COPY OF THIS FORM,IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CESAW Form 5e1
Dec 1993

12/18/95 13:25 3`919 331 4739 NCDOT EC DIST 1 CJ004
-5-
NATIONWIDE PERMIT # 3: MAINTENANCE. AUTHORIZES REPAIR, REHABILITATION, OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED CURRENTLY SERVICEABLE STRUCTURE CR
FILL OR OF ANY CURRENTLY SERVICEABLE STRUCTURE OR FILL AUTHORIZED BY 33 CFR
330.3. DOES NOT AUTHORIZE MAINTEN„NCE DREDGING AND BEACH RESTORATION.
SECTIONS 10 AND 404.
STATUS IN NORTH CAROLINA: ISSUED.
NATIONWIDE CONDITIONS: STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS AND THE FOLLOWING SPECIFT_C
CONDITIONS:
1. THE STRUCTURE OR FILL IS NOT TO BE PUT TO USES DIFFERING FROM THOSE
USES SPECIFIED OR CONTEMPLATED FOR IT IN THE ORIGINAL PERMIT OR THE MOST
RECENTLY AUTHORIZED MODIFICATION.
2. MINOR DEVIATIONS DUE TO CHANGES IN MrTERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
OR CURRENT CONSTRUCTION CODES OR SAFETY STANDARDS WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO
MAZE REPAIR, REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT TO CURRENT SAFETY STANDARDS ARE
PERMITTED.
3. INCLUDES THOSE STRUCTURES AND FILLS DESTROYED WITHIN THE PAST TWO
YEARS BY STORMS, FLOODS, FIRE CR OTHER DISCRETE EVENTS, BUT WHICH WERE
SERVICEABLE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING TEAT EVENT.
REGIONAL CONDITIONS: NONE.
401 CTRTIFICATIOH DETERMINATION: GENERAL CERTIFICATION ISSUED, BUT
CONDITIONED AS FOLLOWS:
1. ESTABLISHED SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ARE UTILIZED TO •
PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF TEE APPROPRIATE TURBIDITY WATER QUALITY STANDARD (50
NTUS IN STREAMS AND RIVERS NOT DESIGNATED AS TROUT BY NCDEM; 25 NTUS IN
ALL SALTWATER CLASSES AND ALL LAKES AND RESERVOIRS; AND 10 NTUS IN TROUT
WATERS) .
2. ME7,. ?MS SHALL BE TAZEN TO PREVENT LIVE OR FRESH CONCRETE FROM COMING
INTO CONTACT WITH WATERS OF TEE STATE UNTIL THE CONCRETE HAS HARDENED.
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: CONSISTENT- IN COASTAL AREA SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. SHOULD ALL OR PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY BE LOCATED WITHIN AN
AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC) AS DESIGNATED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA -
COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSIC.i, A COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT (CAMP) PERMIT
IS REQUIRED .FROM THE NCDCM UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS A FEDERAL AGENCY. IF
THE APPLICANT IS A FEDERAL AGENCY AND ALL OR PART OF TEE DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITY IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AEC, A CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO
15 CFR 930 MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE NCDCM AT LEAST 90 DAYS BEFORE TEE ONSET
OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY.

• - • (CI!)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT'JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 1405
Elizabeth City,N.C.27906-1405
Phone: [phone]
September 29, 1995
R. Jennings & Annie P. White, Jr.
P.O. Box 147
Conway, N.C. 27820
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to
replace the existing bridge over the Potecasi Creek on SR 1160 in Hertford County.
The existing bridge is functionally deficient and is scheduled to be replaced by a
reinforced concrete structure.
The attached form is submitted to insure that adjacent, riparian landowners
have an opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. I have also included a
copy of the CAMA Major Development Permit and engineering drawings which depict
the project in plan view (overhead view). Please review this material at your
convenience and, if you have no objections to the project, please return the form with
your response within 30 days to this office. If you do have objections to the project,
please forward your comments to:
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health _
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
r?/).al4/26a#
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer
Planning & Environmental Branch
Attachments
cc: John Parker, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., NCDOT, Raleigh
e

y •
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 1405
Elizabeth City,N.C.27906-1405
Phone:[phone]
September 29, 1995
Smithfield Carroll's Farm
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to
replace the existing bridge over the Potecasi Creek on SR 1160 in Hertford County.
The existing bridge is functionally deficient and is scheduled to be replaced by a
reinforced concrete structure.
The attached form is submitted to insure that adjacent, riparian landowners
have an opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. I have also included a
copy of the CAMA Major Development Permit and engineering drawings which depict
the project in plan view (overhead view). Please review this material at your
convenience and, if you have no objections to the project, please return the form with
your response within 30 days to this office. If you do have objections to the project,
please forward your comments to:
• Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely
ro-).aez-v4i
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer
Planning & Environmental Branch
Attachments
cc: John Parker, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., NCDOT, Raleigh
0

v .... . ,4...21-7-1,..,,,,
/4?-it: 1 -‘,
\k„,,‘.......„.
1 4 t(;.. v
t _ ,7;. ).,1
t ,- 44,
....-z.;,..
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. Box 1405
Elizabeth City,N.C.27906-1405
Phone:[phone]
September 29, 1995
W.L. Simons & Agnes R. Simons, Heirs
412 N. Colony Avenue
Ahoskie, N.C. 27910
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to
replace the existing bridge over the Potecasi Creek on SR 1160 in Hertford County.
The existing bridge is functionally deficient and is scheduled to be replaced by a
reinforced concrete structure.
The attached form is submitted to insure that adjacent, riparian landowners
have an opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. I have also included a
copy of the CAMA Major Development Permit and engineering drawings which depict
the project in plan view (overhead view). Please review this material at your
convenience and, if you have no objections to the project, please return the form with
your response within 30 days to this office. If you do have objections to the project,
please forward your comments to:
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
e). tiN'lehliaia,
M. Randall Turner, Division Environmental Officer
Planning & Environmental Branch
Attachments
cc: John Parker, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., NCDOT, Raleigh
IN

962
Receipt for P 013 217 961
Certified Mail Receipt for
' ' No Insurance Coverage Provided -, Certified Mail I. =; Receipt for
tt Certified Mail
I MATED STATES Do not use for International Mail * No Insurance Coverage Provided
POSTAL Y WCE t« ,1(See Reverse) •
er.,t Do not use for International Mail .� No Insurance Coverage Provided
POSTAL SERVICE
-
"` (See Reverse) r Mufirl6 Do not use for International Mail
P.'jennifs -3Annle l.Jhi-� s n to - A �DS,K:.
JiTlpe�nd flp. 1� 1 rl £ !►T�'yo� C MM ,1 II�',r� • f .) , Reverse)
�/ U I��t4 {I.-1�, W•l j(—JJ' LJ.� iJ�r t IU'I l rl�I� • ant t0 �1
tr ntand o ��(�I �f' Lai�`r�IIC (��M
State a�nnd(ZIIP1 Code ^) ��a O, Clam kr ee nd ol J �C 111
IM—ll� it-l� ���-�,�LO PAS,Stateand ZIP Cod / � / 1�, 111��� pr, , la40
Postage . I'�' ,�/S IP �G �7 IC) l/
�• .,State an ZIP Code
Postage $ er�Li I U� a0
Certified Fee Postage
Certified Fee - $
Special Delivery Fee
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee .
Restricted Delivery Fee • Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing r Restricted Delivery Fee
•
T to Whom&Date Delivered ''" Return Receipt Showing
m •
c, Return Receipt Showing to Whom, p� to Whom&Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing
c Date,and Addressee's Address to Whom&Date Delivered
7 m Return Receipt Showing to Whom, - _
TOTAL Postage c Date,and Addressee's Address - m Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
O &Fees --, TOTAL Postage - e Date,and Addressee's Address
03
Postmark or 2 p &Fees TOTAL Postage
M orfl_k M' CRnLL
0 Postmark or &Feesti f E r^` 00
( �' -\.C(1 (� �Poo�sttmmaarrk or �,�1
— a 6r.4 05� r° catoal

s
1
�, -a. wn28 But- Jo;.,- us - I . . , Idtea % tun}e 6uisn Jo; n i "�. _, 2 - .. _
��C X
'well" ,p r x. ; -' ' 't mete Id.6oa wn;e utsrtJo .0 uis
�� • dim - „��, �� r ,, � ,�,�< � .- - �.-�_ �(m� - ; � Lf-�
_ a'�`i_Cr.•., 3D+..4l'...t'"4:f..'.a. '�•Z. �..ti i�.; j ~ .N ,LS 5. ,c+ 1
n..
•
'
e
s • • ik Lit m'� x °
Z• mf.. -�.._ m �' v�` C . r �"4 `°� - - •��,�^.:.+J G. t _7 t Cr111 ,; -�. ,� s- m
„-R� - �K: 1 .,a•- _.... 1 't:`• Yy c `cR '�. : > c.1 O -> ..'G .m D
ii
40
ci
J� - oG c • az -o 0 a o: N o f 4= CC
n.y . -m c .4. 0._:..----:.'4 .-4.;�� �! „,_..,. i S to : •+ i CI t1 C -"3!` '_ tD -O _ c t _y z.
}IMF .4
i.^C. "¢i,,-,,,.r� v - L •-— .' m °10 l tr0 "f " _ q
` N .... ... '-4,."r i s Ct 'd` ' .J"ft i ai ,of k"l X. ;",y. - w - �. e - N ' ,.,, .E y- �. s- . m .. ..j
•S' •3_Om ,4 s.. ��i © ��� y 3i `k 'Q CC' y"�1 ❑ ❑ N; rx �:3c.v Alm + - � i n ,'
' � �;.�+' fr.- , ,'."_ � ''� :i ..:.1 y-r.- -N. ,;..'`s �'-". s/ '` aid .,. . 'Q
jr�_;.xy.. ,_. .a..,r �G.O •,.��. �C-.q`f.;. .-;'ek'rah - _ r -� - G P .-- c..r _ •'en f I -.. R�•, _
`C t "f ar 4. S ;'• - O 7- �. "1" t.COW.�. ,fi w!...`. '- -'±' C 3' ,+•^z.;,q�.. gr . 'Airs '„
•
. .rr - ..: Cg - aq.
,;,�•'r^P�,.^ _,.x, •�:_ + ` •• f e '�.sg, - r.• •c a ii-
l't
z. 4.- �i• L ,-.4 a
---4
• • _ t'`. �..yRI r.:- -,-, -- j„:"..... ,3:..
•+ i
.7'•. ,„.....r ...i. , aes �6�' ka+L am' .. -'., . _, •• a q., :. 'i' • ' +ram a m�.( � y ,c � ti1�... .:r ' ,rr' �., '�'� I 7._ ._
l .i:':P \ • ,�,OK .,. •1si.� !' 0 0! v[Y...„�.. - Y 1 A1.,,,,�1 •
f .c: , - yw- Ul ,y'�N #' I:: :ti�xt_' „;-`r."-a' w'`--m.c° U CV •-,' n.. * r *. �i CV•. m -,
t ' a.. . . C) > ., •- w '< .. -+ ; d f a :�'<* "�,sit ^ CO m
Y- t
.si
71' 1-4
r l r ' m"•1•. O : �•. .�R�, a. es' •., --y.T 6 m. -8 0 C_ G` x F U) I -0 c 1
° w ��..J it w _ >C z ce,. g .--•
= w s j.' -3 .., L ek it`s 6 ri 4w 1'- yi.b .' `:m r
.. + �. i i s+ `'• cam'lip q�w v f. • �! C x ./_' �`
r s^ • 7+ X n 3 a 0�«Lt v"R g Y O ?. . �5#�m"r CL� \ D Orl,
*,_ .. aq. a. 4 '-a U] z ''t;; o c c Paz m f`g d, r �aII ,yY ``a r�
4r CV 0 iToW ILt�{ a3Q'.°st-' K RS g �ox m Kr os rsi
• '1 '•'• .•e.iar a Yl� "• • . a f M U] • • e OAP - ` -
Aw. fi s�a' stas�anal a 1 uo e a a 3 ..s. 7 5' 0 ,��:,• C -
::< 0 SS3 Q rn epis,, aie .. •'peialdwoo SS3aQQ1 Nti Tf. mci 4W t._.=;z:' __ p= �•.w < Q, ;- 4 s epl''a Q a � •' • -- (n
' sae elf _ GL R`T�1� ono a