NCDOT 24-03 Minor Mod 2004

JAN. -23' 04 01) 09 32 DEHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL [phone] P,002
Permit Class
MODIFICATION/1VIINOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
J)trmt't
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
— Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Permit Number
24.03
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation,113 Airport Drive, Edenton, NC 27932
Authorizing development in Hyde County at adj. Atlantic Ocean. highway NC 12,
Ocracoke Island as requested in the permittee's application dated 12/29/03, including the
attached workplan drawings (3): 1 dated as received on 12/31/03:_ and 2 dated as 1/20/04.
This permit, issued on t iaama , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
oe suolect to Imes, imprisonment or civn tutlon: or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) This minor modification authorizes the construction of primary dunes along NC Highway 12 on
Ocracoke Island, in accordance with the attached workplan drawings.
2) All work shall be conducted above (landward) of mean high water.
3) Within 30 days of receiving this permit modification, the permittee shall submit planview workplan
drawings to DCM for the entire work area depicting the following information: mean high water: the
roadway location including edge of pavement, centerline and right of way; and the location of the dune
that is authorized by this minor modification.
NOTE: According to the petmittee, the proposed work will involve approximately 350,000 cubic
yards of sand.
(See attached sheets for Additional Permit Conditions)
t tits permit action may oe eppealea by the permntee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires an
December 31, 2006
In issuing this permit, the state of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coasml Resources Commission.
4,e,�; ChaKes S. Jones, Acting Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

JAN,-23'04(FR1) 09:32 DEHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL:[phone] P.003
N.C. Department of Transportation Permit #24.03
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE; The permittee is strongly encouraged to expedite efforts to develop and implement a long-term
solution to the maintenance and protection of NC Highway 12 along Ocracoke Island in
coordination with the Outer Banks Task Force.
4) In order to protect sea turtle and piping plover populations, no work shall be conducted during the sea
turtle and piping plover breeding season from April I" to November 151' of any year without first
obtaining approval from ACM in consultation with the National Park Service (NPS) and the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC).
5) If work must be conducted outside of the authorized area, additional authorization from the N.C.
Division of Coastal Management (DCM) will be required, either through permit modification or a new
CAMA major permit as deemed appropriate by DCM.
6) Nothing in this permit authorizes any activity that has not received approval from the National Park
Service (NPS) for work within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.
7) No wetlands shall be excavated, filled, or directly impacted in any way.
8) The permittee shall obtain approval from DCM. in consultation with NPS, on the compatibility of any
fill material used for this project, including dredge spoil, other than overwashed and overblown sands
within the NC Highway 12 Right -of -Way adjacent to the work area.
9) All material used for dune reconstruction shall be sand that is clean and free of any pollutants, except in
trace quantities.
10) All sands used for dune reconstruction must be of the same general characteristics as the sand in the
existing dunes and ocean beach where it is to be placed. The sand used to construct the dune must be
compatible with the existing sand's color and grain size.
11) The dunes being reconstructed shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetation as quickly as is feasible.
The planting shall be done in a manner acceptable to DCM and NPS. If the vegetation is not successful,
then replanting of the dune may be required within one year of notification by ACM and/or NPS.
intenance Clause
12) ACM shall be notified in writing at least two (2) weeks in advance of any maintenance work authorized
by this permit, and such notification shall include:
A. The number of the original permit.
B. A statement that no dimensional changes are proposed.
C. A copy of the original permit plans with cross -hatching indicating the area to be maintained.
D. The date of map revision and the permittee's signature shown anew on the original plan.
E. A description of the amount of sand to be used for dune maintenance in cubic yard-., and The
source of this sand.

JAN.-23'04(FR1) 09:33 OEHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL:[phone] P.004
<J N.C. Department of Transportation
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit #24-03
Page 3 of 3
13) This minor modification must be attached to the original of Permit No. 24-03, which was issued on
2/19/03, as well as the minor modification that was issued on 11/6/03, and all documents must be readily
available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance,
14) All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless
altered hcrein.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary O
May 14,2004 � u 7Z
MAY 1 7 2004
Clay Willis
Division Environmental Officer Morehead City DCM
NC Department of Transportation, Division One
113 Airport Drive
Edenton, NC 27932
RE: Refinement of CAMA Major Development Permit No. 24-03 for dune maintenance along
NC Highway 12 on Ocracoke Island, Hyde County.
Dear Mr. Willis:
This is a Letter of Refinement for CAMA Major Permit No. 24-03. Based upon conversations
between the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and the N.C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT), Condition No. 3 of the minor modification that was issued on 1/23/04
is hereby amended as follows:
3) Within 30 days of receiving this permit modification, the permittee shall submit planview
workplan drawings to DCM for the entire work area depicting the following information:
the roadway location including edge of pavement, centerline and right of way; and the
location of the dune that is authorized by this minor modification.
Please be advised that through this Letter of Refinement, DCM conveys its determination that
the above change to Condition No. 3 of the minor modification that was issued on 1/23/04 is
consistent with existing State rules and regulations and is in keeping with the original purpose
and intent of CAMA Permit No. 24-03, with the following conditions:
1. Condition No. 3 of the minor modification that was issued on 1/23/04 requires that
the required planview workplan drawings be submitted to DCM within 30 days of
receiving the permit modification. The permittee shall submit this information to
DCM promptly to ensure permit compliance.
2. When the planview workplan drawings are submitted, the permittee shall ensure that
the workplan drawings accurately depict the full project length due to discrepancies
in the estimated project length that were submitted in the permit modification
request dated 12/29/03.
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: hftp://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

3. This Letter of Refinement must be attached to the original of CAMA Permit No. 24-
03, which was issued on 2119/03, as well as the minor modifications issued on
1116/03 and 1/23/04, and all documents must be readily available on site when a
DCM representative inspects the project for compliance.
4. All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force unless altered
herein.
Please contact Cathy Brittingham at [phone] x238 or Lynn Mathis at [phone] if
you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Doug Huggett
Major Permits and Consistency Coordinator
Cc: Lynn Mathis, DCM
DCM-Morehead City

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
December 29, 2003
Division of Coastal Management
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Attention: Lynn Mathis
SECRETARY
The purpose of this letter is to request a modification to Major Permit # 24-03 to CAMA
emergency general permit for the reconstruction of primary dunes on Ocracoke Island that were destroyed
by Hurricane Isabel on 09/18/03. The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
reconstruct dunes in an attempt to stabilize a post storm dune line on the north end of Ocracoke Island. The
general area of the proposed work begins 1.7 miles from the Ocracoke/ Hatteras. ferry dock and ends 6.5
miles south of the ferry dock. The reconstructing of the dune areas will involve the placement of sand in
designated areas adjacent to the roadway in accordance with the provided permit drawings. These dunes
will be, shaped to have a 3:1 slope on the backside and a 5:1 slope on the ocean side. The base width of the
dune will be 90 feet. There will be a 10-foot shoulder between the edge of pavement and the backside toe of
dune. This will result in a footprint area for the shoulder and the dune of 100 feet from the edge of
pavement. Based on a jurisdictional call made by the Corp of Engineers the dune footprint of 100 feet from
the edge of pavement can be constructed without a Corp of Engineer permit. This is because the Mean High
Water mark recognized by the Corp of Engineers was determined to be more than 100 feet oceanward from
the edge of NC 12 pavement, thus allowing NCDOT to work within that zone without acquiring a COE
permit. Disturbance to existing vegetated dunes will be minimized to the maximum extent possible. The
newly constructed dunes will be tied into existing dune on either side, so the dune is continuous. Sprigging
_.
of the rebuilt dunes wilf take place after the' dune reconstruction is fitushed or during the most productive
time to plant. Thismill be done with 80 % American beach grass and 20% sea oats. A general work plat has
been included with this letter to show a typical of the dune structure. Sand used to build the dunes will come
from the ferry dredge spoil site located on the north end of Ocracoke. This dredge site has been used in the
past for dune construction on Ocracoke Island. Consultation with the National Park Service and the
Division of Coastal Aanagement will be taken during the life of the project. In order to prevent any
detrimental effects on protected animals that use the ocean shoreline, this work will be done in consultation
with the U.S.F.W.S. and the N.P.S. If any additional information is needed, please call Clay Willis at 252-
482-5889.
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
r

CC: Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Bill Arrington, DCM
Terry Moore, DCM
Bill Biddlecome, COE
Steve Harrison, NPS
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
John Hennessy, DWQ
Mike Thomas, DWQ
Don Conner, NCDOT
Gretchen Byrum, NCDOT
Allen Russell, NCDOT
Roy Shelton, NCDOT
v4
Sincerely,
Don Conner
Division One Engineer
�
��
Clay s
Division One Environmental Officer
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 —Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Hurricane Isabel Dune Reconstruction
S o U
N 9
G �
LS
Y � �
t.wn waa
_ . x
(u Mdal!L �
N O.M C. 0Y C�K
m 1 m,rt K F.
Area covers under permit 24-03
Area to be covered under permit modifiction to 24-03
i
I
I N
i
W E
S
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I

a
I
,Pl
j
�Y M1 l{f/r
1,
s
f
/ I b
q'
I
t H+ e
x,
t
t
�a r,

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name-N. C..Department of Transportation.
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
b. City, town, community or landmark
Ocracoke
c. Street address or secondary road number
NC 12
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? -Yes -X No'
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Atlantic Ocean , Pamlico
Sound
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Name Clay Willis, Environmental Officer a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina; bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Address 113 Airport Road Primary Dune:Reconstruction'
City Edenton State N.C.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone] project, new work, or both? both
c. Will the project be for . public, private or
Fax [phone] commercial use? public
d.� Give a bhef�description of purpose, use, methods of
c. Project name (if any) construction and . daily operations of proposed
Ocracoke Dune Reconstruction project. If more. space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Rebuild .primary, dune:' line on
NOTE: Permit will be issued in"name of landowner(s), Ocracoke Island from 1T-4ales south- 'of the
andlorproject name. Hatteras ferry to appro.6 miles soutk`of
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Hyde
washing out during storm events ,Mi4 mork will
be accomplished by hauling sand hi and placing it
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 5.5 miles long by 140 feet wide
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 2-6 feet
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
CrB (Corolla) sand, BeE (Beaches) sand
e.. Vegetation on tract sparse beachgrass,.penny
wort, seashore elder, sea oats, and cedars .
f. Man-made features now on tract NC 12 and
current dune line
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
X Conservation _ Transitional
Developed Community
Rural X Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Park Service Property, NCDOT right-of-way
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes _ No
(Attach zoning compliancecertfficate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? _ Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes —No
Coastal (marsh) Other '
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? No
(Attach documentation, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) surface runoff
from NC 12
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to • the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written.perm fission
from the owner to carry out the project. '
• An accurate, dated work plat (including pIan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 I/T' by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies willbe accepted -,.Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable .only if an
adequate number of quality copies are ' provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's' use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plate
requirements and it must be` sufficiently, detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary. .
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners

Form DCM-MP-1
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name National Park Service Property
Address 1401 National Park Drive, Manteo N.C.
27954
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA Permit 135-93 issued 1993, Permit
modification to 135-93 issued 1999. Cama major
permit 24-03, Cama modification to 24-03
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with' the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of .my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the SO bey of A?ce,%&r 2003.
Print Name Clay Willis
Signature /.fA.. Zf��
Lando rAuthorizedAgent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3 Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE Please sign'and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
.other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length width Depth Depth
s 5
2",
Y
See
attached
sheet
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material- to - be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards None
b. Type of material to be excavated None
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes No
N/A
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards None
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N/A
(See Attachment),
a. Location of disposal area N/A
a:
b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to disposal area? N/A
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes -_ No N/A
If yes, where?
Revised o3/9s

Fbrm DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? N/A
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
N/A
Yes _ No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization Sand Dune
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length. approximately 4.4 miles
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
project will not go waterward of the MHW or
NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
project will not go waterward of the MHW or
NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Dune washed out during Hurricane Isabel
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material primary sand
dune
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level None
(1) Ripmp
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type -'of fill material sand from the ferry dredge
spoil site on the north end of Ocracoke Island'
i. Source of fill material sand from Hatteras Inlet
ferry dredge spoil site on Ocracoke Island
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water N/A
(2) Dimensions of fill area N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
_ Yes X- No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area N/A
(2) Purpose of fill N/A
off C70 TOM M.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT's Best
Management Practices : for soil and. erosion
control
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Bulldozers, Frontend Loaders, Dump trucks
c', Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to'project site?:._ Yes X ..No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
A licant o jed Name
Date
Revised 03/95

1 ;,,,y6 , 10 �t
Ho';.4a
Scw�e.
= ao fr.

a
OCT 17 2003
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 3, 2003
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
Attention: Bill Arrington
The purpose of this letter is to request a modification to Major Permit # 24-03 to CAMA
emergency general permit for the reconstruction of primary dunes and portions NC 12 that were destroyed
by Hurricane Isabel. The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to reconstruct dunes in
an attempt to stabilize a post storm dune line on the North end of Ocracoke Island. The current state of the
eroded dunes is the result of Hurricane Isabel that impacted the coast on 09/18/03. The general area of the
proposed work begins 1.7 miles from the Ocracoke/ Hatteras ferry dock and ends 6.5 miles south of the
ferry dock. The reconstructing of the dune areas will involve the placement of approved sand in designated
areas adjacent to the roadway. This sand will be shaped in coordination with the permit drawings that are
provided and as was discussed in an on -site meeting between the Division of Coastal Management (DCM),
Corp of Engineers, National Park Service and NCDOT representatives on September 29, 2003. There will
be no disturbance of existing vegetated dunes. The newly constructed dunes will be at the same height of
the existing dune on either side and tied in so the dune is continuous. Sprigging of the rebuilt dunes will
take place after the dune reconstruction is finished or during the most productive time to plant. This will be
done with 80 % American beach grass and 20% sea oats. A general work plat has been included with this
letter to show a typical of the dune structure. Sand used to build the dunes will come from the overwashed
sand on -site and the dredge spoil site located on the north end of Ocracoke. This dredge site has been used
in the past and has been approved for dune construction on Ocracoke Island. Consultation with the National
Park Service and the Division of Coastal Management will be taken during the life of the project. In order
to prevent any detrimental effects on protected animals that use the ocean shoreline, this work will be done
in consultation with the U.S.F.W.S. and the N.P.S. If any additional information is needed, please call Clay
Willis at 252-482-5889.
Sincerely,
Don Conner
Division One Engineer
Clay W
Division One Environmental Officer
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NAT• PARK SERVICE Fax:[phone] Oct 14 '03 12:15 P.02
2T \\1( N
:a
IN REPLY RFFCW TO.
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OIr THE INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
OUTER BANKS GROUP
For Raleigh National Historic Site Wright Brothers National Memorial
Cape Hatteras National Seashore
N1621 (CAHA)
October 14, 2003
Mr. Garland Pardue
U.S. Fish and Nyildlife Service
Ecological Field Station
PO Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Dear Mr. Pardue:
t401 National Park Drive
Manteo, North Carolina 27954
With the changed Outer Banks landscape resulting from Hurricane Isabel, there has been
interest from various agencies on the status of sea turtle -nests on the beaches of Cape
Hatteras National Seashore.
Among the destruction caused by the storm was the loss of all retraining turtle nests
throughout the length of the seashore. We have surveyed all safely accessible beaches in
the park and have not found a single nest. The stomfs dramatic affects on the beaches lead
us to believe that no nests survived the storm. In addition, storm events beginning
September 1 caused beach erosion and documented loss of nests prior to the arrival of
Hurricane Isabel.
Although we patrol the beaches each morning during nesting season to look for crawls,
there are a few instances over the years in which we have failed to locate a fresh nest. That
remains a remote possibility. Again, even if we had missed finding the nest, it is unlikely
it would have survived the storm.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve Harrison, Chief of Resource Management
at 252-473-2111, extension 159.
Sincerely,
Lawrence A. Belli
Superintendent
Outer .banks Group

MAT- PARK SERVICE Fax:[phone] Oct 14 '03 12:15 P.03
Cc:
Clay Willis, NC Department of Transportation
Bill Biddlecome, U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers
David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Matthew Godfrey, State Turtle Biologist
SDHarrison:mfr

Hurricane Isabel Dune Reconstruction
�v r
yo
c
0
I 1`
� y
Y P
\ LC
a Area covered under permit 24-03
i
I
. r
T
Area to be covered under permit modification to 24-03
N
WE
S
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
I 1 I I I I I I

C K,W Cmk
Itl..d
CO41
y C�3 S
Pe Q'JO iM
e K �
O
P G
G �
O.
0` ph
6 Kno{I 4 G�
f
There are three road washout areas that total to equal 9/10 of a mile
of road washout that will be repaired within project area. The repairs will
be on existing alignment.
(trwdi IJrvid
n�.
P
Project Boundaries for dune
reconstructionand andfoad
replacement project, approximately
5 miles.
i1
0

It,
f `�

-4nk, )S aL mar+
r Q 5 -2\NOS?J 21 ?N -2�o�
ll �u Yx.aiav uV
57n
LZT.,,
o,ot�2Z of
fA/b ,SL
III
f-0/62/6
CWN1-3�
ali a- ac+vs
"%srs -Wss t yvu
:Y7 -sA5r07 CLL -dwaat _.++ewarvd

Fill associated with the Dune Construction on Ocracoke Island after Hurricane
Isabel
Site 1-9 are identified in Major permit #24-03
Rita 1 a ic the new washout area that the dune will be rebuilt adiacent to the road
Site
Begimung
Ending
Total Site Length
Total Disturbed Area
1
1.73 miles
1.97 miles
1267 feet
0
2
2.03 miles
2.11 miles
422 feet
25320 s . ft. 0.58 acres
3
2.15 miles
2.16 miles
52 feet
0
4
2.24 miles
2.38 miles
739 feet
44340 s . ft. 1.02 acres
5
2.51 miles
2.52 miles
79 feet
5530 s . ft. 0.13 acres
6
2.59 miles
2.67 miles
422 feet
29540 s . ft. 0.68 acres
7
2.76 miles
2.89 miles
686 feet
48020 s . ft. 1.10 acres
8
3.46 miles
3.46 miles
15 feet
600 s . ft. 0.01 acres
9
3.71 miles
3.71 miles
15 feet
600 s . ft. 0.01 acres
��10-1
3.71 miles
6.1 miles
12626 feet
505040 s . ft 11.5 acres

i
t
m

t �
k
t�

• Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Clay Willis. Environmental Officer
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Isabel Ocracoke Dune
Work
;*.({YI'E: Pemdt wldf be issued in name of /andowner(s), andiff project
prune.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Hyde
b. City, town, community or landmark
Ocracoke Island
c. Street address or secondary road number
NC 12
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Alantic Ocean/Pamlico Sound
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Rebuild Primary Dune line on Ocracoke
Island from 1.7 miles south of the Hatteras ferry
to approximately 6 miles south of the Hatteras
ferry near the pony pens. Rebuild portions of the
road within this area that washed out during the
storm. Total area washed out is approximately
9/10 of a mile.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? _ public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. _ Purpose of project is to construct a sand
dune that will protect NC 12 during high water
events on Ocracoke Island. This will be done by
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
means of dump trucks hauling sand that will be
placed adiacent to the road. The sand will then be
shaped by bulldozers to the profile that has been
provide in the work plat.
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 5.5 miles long by 150 feet wide
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Beaches sand
e. Vegetation on tract beach gas ss, penny wart, sea
elder, and sea oats
f. Man-made features now on tract NC 12
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Caasuk the lamlland use plan.)
X Conservation— Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
b. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Federal Land Conservation
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attachz dvcantp&un certliita4ifappGmb(e)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes —No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? No
(Attach dawmentatiaa, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
surface runoff from NC 12
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
hi addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it

Form DCM-MP-1
I
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
*A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
*A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they Have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
finther certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name National Park Service Property
Address f401 National Park Drive, Manteo N.
27954
Phone
Name
Address '
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Cama major permit 24-03
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S.113A -1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 13 day of Oct. , 2003.
Print Name Clay Willis
Signature141
Landoumez&Audwnwd,Vmt
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4
Structures Information
DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
*w) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
See
attached
sheet
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards None
b. Type of material to be excavated None
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No N/A
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards clear road
shoulder for a distance of approximately 4 miles
to a width of 15- 40 feet to establish vrestorm
shoulder, and recover sand for dune
reconstruction. This will epual approximately
45,000 cubic yards of material.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N/A
(See Attachment)
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes —No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
[!
Will a disposal
maintenance? _
If yes, where?
area be available for future
Yes _ No
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(]Except bridges and culverts)
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? N/A
Yes —No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water? N/A
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization Sand Dune
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length approximately 4 miles
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
oceanside toe of dune 100-150' landward of
MHW
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
oceanside toe of dune 400' landward of MHW
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Dune washed out during Hurricane Isabel
(Source of wfa natim)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material sand dune
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level None
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material sand
i. Source of fill material sand from Hatteras Inlet
dredge spoil site and overwashed sand on NC12
and shoulder section
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes _ No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
None
(2) Dimensions of fill area N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area N/A
(2) Purpose of fill N/A
Revised 03/95

" Form DCM-MP-2
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for soil and erosion control
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Bulldozers, Frontend Loaders, Dump trucks
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? —Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Applicant or Project Name
//
Signature
October 15, 2003
Date
Revised 03/95

n•.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
USACE
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Biddlecome:
November 7, 2003
�L
NOV 1 2 2003
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
S� u� rt o,'sej 1i - /Kee - f� ioG r1
As you are aware, Hurricane Isabel did extensive damage to the beach, dunes, and NC 12 on
the northern end of Ocracoke Island. The USACE has issued a General (Regional) Permit for
protective dune reconstruction in this area. The permit drawings for this permit show a dune
height of 6-10 feet with variable slopes. The typical section extends from the centerline of NC
12 out seventy-five (75) feet. Considering the pavement width and shoulder area, this allows a
dune base width of approximately 55 feet. This size of the dune, which was originally
requested by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), was based to a large
degree on the amount of sand that could be recovered on Ocracoke to rebuild the dune.
Currently the reconstruction of NC 12 has been completed with the exception of the asphalt
pavement, which will be completed next spring. However, it has a bituminous surface treatment
and can be opened to traffic now. The dunes, which have been built to date, are 4-6 feet in
height and with a crest width of approximately 5 feet, but this has used all the available sand,
including material from the spoil area at the ferry terminal.
On October 27, 2003 Secretary Tippett signed the cost sharing agreement with the USACE for
NCDOT as the local non-federal sponsor for the Dare County Beaches Study (Hatteras to
Ocracoke). This study is the Long Range Study as originally developed by the Outer Banks
Task Force but was funded as a USACE Water Resources Project. Considering the
current conditions at Ocracoke, NCDOT recognizes the critical need to evaluate alternatives,
develop and implement a long range solution and is committed to accomplishing this in an
expedited manner. We have had initial discussions with your Project Planning Staff about
expediting the Ocracoke area as initial phase of this study. We will be scheduling a meeting
soon with the USACE to discuss a scope and time frame for completing the study for the
Ocracoke area. However, until this study can be completed, NC 12 will have to be maintained.
Since issuance of the permit, the conditions at Ocracoke have been reviewed in greater detail.
A special on -site meeting of the Outer Banks Task Force (OBTF) was held on October 10 and
the Ocracoke situation was discussed in detail at the OBTF meeting held in Williamston on
October 28. Also, Dr. John Fisher and Dr. Margery Overton, who are members of the OBTF
Science Panel, have visited the Ocracoke site. A copy of Dr. Fisher's recommendation is
attached.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHIEF ENGINEER'S OFFICE
1537 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1537
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOr.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILOING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

Mr. Bill Biddlecome
November 7, 2003
Page 2
Based on these additional reviews, discussions and evaluations, NCOOT believes that the dune
size needs to be increased to provide adequate protection for NC 12. Based on Coastal
Resource Commission rules and CAMA legislation, NC 12, after reconstruction, is considered
an imminently threatened structure since site conditions are characterized by a flat beach
profile and accelerated erosion. Also, FEMA's standard for V-zone mapping requires that a
dune have a minimum frontal dune cross sectional area of 540 square feet to be considered
substantial enough to withstand erosion during a base flood event.
We are requesting that the General (Regional) Permit be modified to allow a dune 10 feet in
height above the grade of NC 12, a crest width of 10 feet, 3:1 slopes on the roadway side, and
5:1 slopes on the ocean side. This dune section provides a base width of approximately 90 feet.
A 10 foot shoulder is needed between the edge of pavement and base of the dune. This
requested dune size is very similar to the one being constructed at the Hatteras Breech site.
Also, with regard to FEMA criteria, it provides 500 square feet of dune cross sectional area.
The crest width of 10 feet is needed for construction purposes and to provide additional dune
mass for protection. This proposed section would extend for approximately six miles, but the
permit modification is only needed for areas where the section would extend into the
jurisdictional waters area as determined by the USACE.
As part of the on -going study for Interim Improvements at the Ocracoke "hot spot", NCDOT's
consultant has completed a vulnerability analysis (Vulnerability Analysis of NC 12 Ocracoke
Island Hot Spot — Draft Report dated May 2003) prior to Hurricane Isabel. The purpose of the
analysis was to determine where the roadway system would be subject to increased
maintenance and damage. An approximate 2.3 mile section, which starts 1.25 miles south of
the ferry terminal, was identified as currently vulnerable or likely to become vulnerable. Within
this section, the average dune height was approximately 10 feet above the roadway grade, the
average dune width was approximately 140 feet, and the average distance from NC 12 to mean
high tide was approximately 275 feet.
Within this 2.3 mile section, there was one pre -storm segment of approximately 1500 feet in
length which was estimated to be vulnerable to as little as a five year storm event. Dunes in
this area were less than 10 feet in height with an average base width of approximately 90 feet.
The average distance from the roadway to mean high tide was approximately 210 feet. This is
the area where NC 12 on Ocracoke suffered the most extensive damage during Hurricane
Isabel. A copy of the vulnerability analysis is available for your review if desired. The post -
Isabel conditions, with the loss of the dunes and a narrowed beach, make NC 12 even more
vulnerable and for a segment length of approximately 4,000 feet.
The 4,000-foot segment, which is most vulnerable, has little or no foreshore or beach face.
Absence of well established foreshore allows greater wave energy and erosive force to be
transmitted onto the beach. Reconstruction of a dune at this location without sufficient beach
profile is viewed as a temporary action to protect NC 12 independent of dune size, shape, or
mass. A foreshore buttress of compatible sand should be placed seaward of the dune line.
This will aid in the formation of an inner bar and necessary foreshore zone. It is NCDOT's
position that, without the foreshore buttress there is no available means of providing protection
for dune integrity at this location. If the foreshore buttress is not provided, the General
(Regional) Permit should include provision for future repairs and/or reconstruction to the
permitted cross section.
During the past month, more consideration has been given to possible sources of sand material
to rebuild the dune to a size that will more adequately protect the roadway. Presently, we are

Mr. Bill Biddlecome
November 7, 2003
Page 3
planning on using sand material that will be dredged by the Ferry Division from the ferry
channels in Hatteras Inlet and stockpiled at the existing spoil site near the ferry terminal. The
sand will be hauled by truck to the berm site along NC 12. Use of off -road trucks along the
beach is proposed.
Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of this request as time is of the essence.
The berm reconstruction will need to be completed during winter months and prior to the turtle -
nesting season.
If you have any questions, please contact Don Conner or Jerry Jennings at 252-482-7977,
Roy Shelton at 919-733-7844, Ext. 293 or Dave Henderson at 919-250-4100.
S' rely,
S. Varnedoe, P. .
Chief Engineer — Operations
Enclosure
cc: Secretary Lyndo Tippett
Caitlin Hughes, Federal Programs Coordinator
L. A. Sanderson, P.E., State Highway Administrator
Roger Sheats, NCDOT
John Sullivan, FHWA
Colonel Charles R. Alexander, Jr., USACE
Donna Moffitt, DCM
Lawrence Belli, NPS
Greg Thorpe, NCDOT
- Dr. Ken Taylor, NC Division of Emergency Management
David Franklin, USACE
Ken Jolly, USACE

Mr. Bill Biddlecome
November 7, 2003
Page 4
bc: Dave Henderson, NCDOT
Charles Jones, DCM
Steve Harrison, NPS
Jerry Jennings, NCDOT
Don Voelker, FHWA
Emily Lawton, FHWA
Clay Willis, NCDOT
Wayne Bissette, USACE
Roy Shelton, NCDOT
Ken Pace, NCDOT
Gretchen Byrum, NCDOT
Jerry Gaskill, NCDOT Ferry Division

PiCV •06 2003 5:47PM MCSU 252 846 2868 p.2
North Carolina State University is a land. Department of Civil. Construction,
grant university and a cansti-uan: institution and Envimnmental Engineering
of TN Universiy of North Carcl;ra
208 Mann lkl' / 25C1 Stinson Crive
Campus Box 79C8
Raleigh, NC 27695-79M
i 919.515.2331
November 4, 2003 919 515.7999 (fax)
wwwce.ncsu.edu
Mr. Roy Shelton
NCDOT
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Roy:
Thank you for the opportunity to join you and others on the trip to Ocracoke Island late
Iast month to see the post -Isabel damage. I was surprised that this storm did so much
damage to the beach, dunes and NC12. The department's efforts to get the road open are
noteworthy.
As you know, the dune is an important element in providing protection to the highway
along the Outer Banks. We have learned from previous storms that a large dune can
reduce the risk of ovenvash and road damage. While not a permanent solution these
dunes do provide short -terns protection for the highway, A good example of this is the
dunes the department constructed in the Buxton area after Hurricane Dennis. These
dunes provided adequate protection during Hurricane Isabel.
I am concerned that the dunes the department built on Ocracoke after Hurricane Isabel
are too small. These dunes have a crest elevation of about 4 ft above grade, and a crest
width of around 5 ft. The Banton dunes had a crest elevation of about 15 ft above grade
and a crest width of about 15 ft. I understand that the dunes to be built at the Hatteras
breach are going to have an elevation of about 10 ft above grade and a crest width of 10
ft. At a minimum, I recommend that the department increase the size of the Ocracoke
dunes to those being built at the Hatteras breach. If not, then it is likely that there will be
numerous problems this winter along the Ocracoke portion ofNC12.
I would be pleased to discuss this recommendation further with you.
Sincerely,
G Gar
John S. Fisher, Ph. D., P.E.
/ Professor of Civil Engineering

NOV.-06'03(THU) 11;18 OEHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL[phone] P.004
Permit Class
MODIFICATION/MINOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vermin
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation,113 Airport Drive, Edenton, NC 27932
Permit Number
24-03
Authorizing development in _ _ Hyde County at adj. Atlantic Ocean, highway NC 12,
Ocracoke Island as requested in the permittee's application dated 10/ 13/03 10 1 Udine tom_
attached workl2lan drawing dated 9129/03.
This permit, issued on 1116111114 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
oe suoiect to tines, imprisonment or civil action: or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) This minor modification authorizes the reconstruction of primary dunes that were destroyed by
Hurricane Isabel along NC Highway 12 on Ocracoke Island, in accordance with the attached workplan
drawing.
NOTE: This permit modification acknowledges repair of NC Highway 12 on Ocracoke Island in
accordance with G.S. 113A-103(5), which states that maintenance or repairs necessary to
repair damage to structures caused by the elements are not deemed to be development by the
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
2) If work must be conducted outside of the area depicted on the authorized workplan drawing, additional
authorization from the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) will be required, either through
permit modification or a new CAMA major permit as deemed appropriate by DCM.
(See attached sheet for Additional Permit Conditions)
tF"ea
...• +,:,,��, u.ay u apptcu oy ale pertruaee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project Is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2006
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
vy
Do . Moffitt, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

NOV.-06'03(THU) 17:19 DEHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL:[phone] P.005
N.C. Department of Transportation Permit #24.03
Page 2 of 2
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) Nothing in this permit authorizes any activity that has not received approval from the National Park
Service (NPS) for work within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore. .
4) No wetlands shall be excavated, filled, or directly impacted in any way.
5) The permittee shall obtain approval from DCM, in consultation with NPS, on the compatibility of any
fill material used for this project, including dredge spoil, other than overwashed and overblown sands
within the NC Highway 12 Right -of -Way adjacent to the work area.
6) All material used for dune reconstruction shall be sand that is clean and free of any pollutants, except in
trace quantities.
7) All sands used for dune reconstruction must be of the same general characteristics as the sand in the
existing dunes and ocean beach where it is to be placed. The sand used to construct the dune must be
compatible with the existing sand's color and grain size.
S) The dunes being reconstructed shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetation as quickly as is feasible.
The planting shall be done in a manner acceptable to DCM and NPS. 1f the vegetation is not successful,
then replanting of the dune maybe required within one year of notification by DCM and/or NPS.
Maintenance Clause
9) DCM shall be notified in writing at least two (2) weeks in advance of any maintenance work authorized
by this permit, and such notification shall include:
A. The number of the original permit.
B. A statement that no dimensional changes are proposed.
C. A copy of the original permit plans with cross -hatching indicating the area to be maintained,
D. The date of map revision and the permittee's signature shown anew on the original plan.
B. A description of the amount of sand to be used for dune maintenance in cubic yards, and the
source of this sand.
10) This minor modification must be attached to the original of Permit No, 24-03, which was issued on
2/19/03, and both documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects
the project for compliance.
11) All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless
altered herein.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required.

Mrnit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal ResouicesCommission'`
*rmit
for
Permit Number
�24-03
4/
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
_ Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation,113 Airport Drive, Edenton, NC' 27932
Authorizing development in Hyde County at adj. Atlantic Ocean, highway NC 12.
Ocracoke Island as requested in the perniittee's application dated 10/15/02, including the
attached workplan drawings (4): 1 dated 10/1/02; 3 dated as received on 10/23/02; and the attached AEC hazard notice.
This permit, issued on 2119/03 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
hp enhierr to finec imnrisnnment nr civil actin nr may caner the nermit in he WWII and void.
Dune Maintenance along NC Highway 12 on Ocracoke Island
NOTE: The area covered by this CAMA permit is also part of the following NCDOT projects being
conducted in coordination with the Outer Banks Task Force.' Therefore, the permittee is
strongly encouraged to ensure that all activities conducted under this permit authorization are
at all times in accordance with the most recent goals and recommendations of the Outer
Banks Task Force.
• TIP No. R-3116A, Ocracoke Island Hot Spot.
• TIP No. R-3116, Long Range Outer Banks Task Force Planning Study.
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for routine maintenance activities along NC
Highway 12 on Hatteras Island and Ocracoke Island.
(See attached sheets for Additional Permit Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2006
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
lJ(onna D. Moffitt, Director
l/ Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

N.C. Department of Transportation
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit #24-03
Page 2 of 3
1) If the permittee needs to conduct work outside of what is depicted on the authorized workplan drawings,
additional authorization from DCM will be required, either through permit modification or a new
CAMA major permit as deemed appropriate by DCM.
2) Nothing in this permit authorizes any activity that has not received approval from the National Park
Service for work within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore. The proposed work shall not commence
until the permittee has been issued a Special Use Permit from the National Park Service (NPS), and a
copy of the Special Use Permit is received by DCM.
3) No wetlands shall be excavated or filled, or directly impacted in any way.
4) The authorized dune maintenance activities may not result in impacts to the existing frontal dune
systems that would weaken the protective values of these dune systems.
5) All work shall be accomplished in such a manner that the damage to existing vegetation is minimized.
6) The pemuttee shall obtain approval from DCM in consultation with NPS on the compatibility of any fill
material used for this project, including dredge spoil, other than overwashed and overblown sands within
the NC Highway 12 Right -of -Way adjacent to the work area.
NOTE: The N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission submitted comments expressing concern that the use
of dredge spoils following utilization of the available overwashed and overblown sands could
create less suitable nesting habitat for sea turtles, particularly on the seaward toe of the dunes
where most turtle nesting would occur. Therefore, the available overwashed and overblown sand
on the north side of the road should first be used to reconstruct the seaward toe of the dune
system in order to promote a suitable nesting area for sea turtles.
7) All sands used to strengthen the dune must be of the same general characteristics as the sand in the
existing dunes and ocean beach where it is to be placed. The sand used to construct the dune must be
compatible with the existing sand's color and grain size.
8) The north and south ends of the dune system undergoing maintenance shall angle onto and blend with"
the existing adjacent frontal dune system. No portion of the dune system undergoing maintenance will
lie oceanward of the adjacent dune system.
9) The dunes undergoing maintenance shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetation as quickly as is
feasible. The planting shall be done in a manner acceptable to DCM and NPS. - If the vegetation is not
successful, then replanting of the dune may be required within one year of notification by I)CM and. ='
NPS.
10) No beach bulldozing seaward of the dune is authorized.

N.C. Department of Transportation
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Sea Turtle and Pipiiie Plover Proiection
Permit #24-03
Page 3 of 3
11) In order to protect sea turtle and piping plover populations, no work shall be conducted during the sea
turtle and piping plover breeding season from April I" to November 15a' of any year without first
obtaining approval from DCM in consultation with NPS and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
(WRC).
12) Sand fence shall be installed in accordance with the attached guidelines for sand fence installation on
North Carolina beaches as prepared by WRC.
General
13) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction must not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
14) All fill material must be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Dune maintenance activities similar to those authorized by this CAMA permit were previously
authorized by CAMA major permit No. 135-93, which expired on 12131/00.
NOTE: The permittee is encouraged to contact the Public Health Pest Management Section at (919) 733-
6407 to discuss mosquito control measures.

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission C
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-133-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
SAND FENCE INSTALLATION ON NORTH CAROLINA BEACHES
Sea turtles nest on nearly all of North Carolina's coastal beaches, laying an average of 600 nests annually. Sea
turtles face many natural hazards and are also affected by human activities. Careful planning can eliminate
,most of the human -caused hazards, such as the placement of sand fencing.
Sand fencing placed on sea turtle nesting beaches may interfere with nesting activity if placed so that it forms a
barrier between the mean high water mark and the primary dune where nests are typically deposited. Sand
fencing should be designed and installed so that it does not impede nesting attempts and/or trap nesting females
and emergent hatchlings. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission recommends placing individual
sections of sand fencing at angles of at least 45° (see drawing) to the shoreline, facing the predominate wind
direction. Placement of fencing at angles greater than 45° to the shoreline is more beneficial to sea turtles; and,
<;Vlacement at 90° is optimal. Individual
'fence sections should not exceed 10 feet in
length and should be spaced at least 7 feet
apart (parallel to each other) to allow sea
turtles to turn around between the fencing
sections. Sand fencing should be placed as
far landward as possible. This method of
sand fencing encourages sand accretion
and minimizes negative impacts to nesting
sea turtles.
There are different types of sand fencing
available. Standard fencing consists of
evenly spaced wooden slats wired together and supported by wooden posts. Woven fabric fence material is also
available and may be used, provided that the fabric sustains a 40% - 60% open space to closed space ratio to
avoid wind damage by allowing air to flow through the material. Remember that fabric -type fences are
susceptible to ultraviolet degradation and may sag and lose its original shape, thus reducing performance.
In order to maximize the benefits of sand fencing, routine maintenance and adjustments are necessary. Once
sand fencing becomes buried, the benefits are no longer realized. Therefore, fencing should be repositioned
before it becomes 50% buried, to maximize sand build up. Sand fencing should not be left buried in newly -
formed sand dunes, and all non-functioning or derelict fencing should be removed from the beach iinmediatcly.
.'Installation and repositioning of sand fencing should be conducted outside the sea turtle nesting season (16
November through 30 April). Call the Sea Turtle Project Coordinator, Division of lVildlife Management,
[phone], for additional technical guidance on sea turtle conservation.
North Carolina Nongame & Endangered NNIldlife Program. P.O. Box 29613, Raleigh. NC 27026-0613. (4)1 Q) 661-43 72.

_ .�VJ 1G•Jf Ll vi Ji Vlv 1 � -Iv OJ1J1 J�� "'-'�•`.+' "��
—2003 WED 1025 AM NC DIV OF COASTAL MGMNT FAX NO. 4 P. 02
AEC HAZARD NOTICE
Pre ject Is Ire An: ✓ Mean Erociible firoa _,igFt Hazard Flood Area ,—_Inlet Hazard Area
Dille Lot Was Flatted: 1J A---- __-,- -
f7,is nulke is i,andod to make you, dic applicant, aW;tre
spa.Clal risks and conditions os:oci;lted with
•'`-nt in this area, which is subject to Pilttlral
it its swr ns, =51an and cu rferlts. The rules of
i I '.sources Cornmission require that you
;III Al-.C. I•]azai'd Notice and acknowledge that
ngtii is in w.riting bcfot•e a penult for developillent ea11 be
Osumi.
1"hc t:ctnttn ic•ion'S males nn hui ldint; stanttards, occanfroalt
�1;1 dnnn. altatationarcdesignc:d lott,iultnicc,but
,,,, pvt) ,arty loss from hazards. By };nulling
.. ;iu? C.'.oastll rtc,s•olllccs Cornmiesion flocs not
• r :.:n:,a lht': sa(c•lY of the dcvcluPn,cnt al,d axsnmes t10
jiabili ty fr,r.futtnla da;ilal;e to the dtwcla}ltncnt.
I'1n' hC::;t availnblc. l tlfurmallcin, as ncccptocl by O e Cuaslll
l (?if)lJ i'l`(.ti C.f)1'111)1i5 j1i)11, inaicol.cs dlat t11C: anllval 0(cef,1t
s r lstcui rt)tC for ll ie ;1n,t l,,•ller e your props rty is located is
(s _07-1 fee t I,'r yc:i r.
..• r,ic wins cstriblished by atrefol analysis of aerial
s c:f the alasUinc lskcn over the A�aslSU years.
11ao indicate that the slwreline could III vc as
tr uci I 1^ndtvard Ina nlajot storm.
floodwatarsinamajorsloro,areprediclrcltubcabunt
.. j.. fcct deep in this area.
-_.u;cd oceanfront protection measures are beach
i,!nncnt and rOocnHon At threatened structures.
erovion control Structures such as bul%ndw
sc•r,1:111;, t'L•vclu'tthlts, groins, jellies and brcakw;itr.s arc
�ni1dIn[Cd, Te,l)porvq devices, indoding sand bags, }may
oc allowcM Imdcr certain condition: •
l ;ti c ;ct r1.lchl rc'Atoll bo rotor, tyl ur di smantled Wi shill two
. s of i,�t•onvul; inlmincntly tl)icalcncd.
o pppliwnt annst acknorvledge this ultnrtnatton nod
roquirr.;tticills by Signilig tliis notice in the below space.
IvVith lut the larolx r slhllature, the applic,liion hill not be
cotnJ,les
SPECIAL NOTE This hazard notice 15 :equlrM for
developmcnlin areas sl,hjcct to sudden atici massive
stormsnnderasion.l'erntitstssu®dfordevelopinentinthis
area expire on Mcenlber 3l of the third yc, r following the
))re r in which th? permit was issued. $lmrtlybeforc w_ ork
begins oil the project site, the Local Permit Officer will
detCl'lll]11C Il1C V�'get;.lUan lint; and setbilck.dislance at your
siLc.lf the property 1,a5 semi 11 ide change and the proposed
dcvcluptuent can still meet ilia setback requirement, the
LPO will inform yoit that yyotrnlayybe{ in Fvnrk, his inlpor-
tant that you check vvhh the.I.PO before thepermitex}uros
Co,: official approval to continue the work after the permit
has expired. Unerally, if foundation [+il.ings have be:'n
placed and subswntinl prugress is conlinli,ng, pernlit
renewal n,ny notbenc'ccssary, if substal'llial,progress has
not bcLm rllnde, the permit must be rcnowecl and a new
setback line established- It is unlavvful to continue work
after permit expiration wi thou t this approval.
POI inove illf0TnlaliUll, CUntartt
Local Permit Officer
zlddross Zl?JS-5'7
LocafitY
111,
Phono

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAI. AND PROCESSING RECORD
1) APPLICANT: NC Department of Transportation County: Hyde
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Ocracoke Island Frontal dune adjacent to NC 12, between 1.73 miles and 3.71
rni les south of the Hatteras ferry terminal.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: 11/15/02
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: Yes To Be Forwarded: No
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Bill Arrington DISTRICT OFFICE: Morehead\
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: (�(�
B) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED IN RALEIGH: FEE REC'D: $i� I
PUBLIC NOTICE RECD: _11 &Z A2 END OF NOTICE DATE: _(Z 1).9107-
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE:
FEDERAL DUE DATE:
DEED REC'D:
ON:
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DATE:
FED COMMENTS REC'D:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
F11t: a
AGENCY
DATECOMMENTS
RRTURNTD
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management - Regional Representative
Coastal Management - LUP Consistency
Division Of COrnimmity Assistance
Land Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Storm Water Management (DWQ)
State Property Office
Division of Archives & History
Division of Environmental Health
Division of Flighways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Division. of Water Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
Submerged Lands (DMF)

r
NOMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
MEMORANDUM:
TO: DOUG HUGGETT
FROM: BILL ARRINGTON
Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
SUBJECT: COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - CAMA MAJOR PERMIT —
Dune Reconstruction adjacent to N.C. 12 in Hyde County
DATE: November 20, 2002
The following are my comments and recommendations regarding the above -mentioned proposal.
The project consists of reconstructing 2378 lineal feet of primary dune in 7 locations and installing
sand fence in 5 of these locations as well as 2 additional locations. These 9 locations extend from
1.73 to 3.71 miles southwest of the Ocracoke -Hatteras Ferry Terminal. NCDOT has reduced the
Ocean Erodible Area AEC system impacts associated with this proposal by not disturbing vegetated
dunes, allowing no heavy machinery on vegetated dunes or water ward of the ocean side dune toe
and by installing sand fence using hand tools. The Atlantic Ocean is classified SB in front of these
dunes. The project is well designed with minimization of impacts. I would recommend the project
be approved contingent upon the following conditions:
1) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters,
vegetated dunes, or vegetated wetlands are not authorized.
2) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time, in any marsh or surrounding
waters, outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the work plats.
3) In order to protect water quality, runoff from the construction must not visibly increase the
amount of suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
4) All fill material must be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

5) Sand fence and sprigging are installed at locations 8 and 9.
6) No permit should be issued and no work is permitted until a Special Use permit is issued by
CHNS office of the National Park Service.
7) In order to minimize impacts to nesting sea turtles, no work shall occur within the period of
to of any year.
Cc: Charles Jones
Terry Moore

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
NCDENR
NORM1I C ROUN DfPYiT OF
FN.Ro..E mo NM.A RE Rcm
151-B HWY. 24, HESTRON BUILDING
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
OFFICE: E64L ADye2riscm"r ScK-Tzcxl
TELEPHONE #:
FROM: B i LL AR w4 CTonl
FAX #: [ZSZ] 443- 3Z49
OFFICE: DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
24 Z66z- /SS4E QG THE-z6gurOR.T- 1ybi Awlo S -
DATE SENT: 11 12o /oz
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET:

r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
November 20, 2002
Beaufort -Hyde News
Legal Advertisement Section
P.O. Box 99
Belhaven, NC 27810
Re: Public Notice — Hyde County
Dear Sir:
Please publish the attached Notice in the Wednesday, November 27, 2002, issue of the
Beaufort -Hyde News.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original
copy of the published notice, and an original invoice to Jaye Poole, NC Division of
Coastal Management, 1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
1638, Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact me at our Morehead City office [phone].
Sincerely,
le-1
Bill Arrington
D.O.T. Field Representative
wla
Enclosure
cc: Terry Moore, District Manager
Doug Huggett
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

NOTICE OF FILING
OF APPLICATION FOR
CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as
required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an Area of
Environmental Concern as designated under the CAMA was received on November 15, 2002.
According to said application, the North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting to
reconstruct primary dunes and install sand fence in 9 locations along N.C. 12, between 1.7 and
3.7 miles southwest of the Ocracoke -Hatteras Ferry Terminal, in Hyde County. A copy of the
entire application may be examined or copied at the office of Bill Arrington, NC Division of
Coastal Management, located at 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, NC, (252)
808-2808 during normal business hours.
Comments mailed to Donna D. Moffitt, Director, Division of Coastal Management, 1638
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1638, prior to December 18, 2002, will be considered
in making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time of
permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review and comment by the public and
state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided upon
written request.
PUBLISHED ON: Please publish on November 27, 2002

M P, 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
NOV-20-2002 WED 12:38 PM
DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE M# DP
NOV720 1217 PM 82529433299 1'17" 3 SEND OK 776

DCM %
DWQ %
Development Type
FEE
(14300 16014351000§3 1625 62531
(24300 1602 435100095 23,
I. Private, non-commercial
,
development that does not involve
$250
100% ($250)
0 % (SO)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
it. Public or commercial development
v-
that does not involve the filling or
S400
100 % (4400)
0 % (SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
III. For development that involves the
filling andfor excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands andfor open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If Geneml water Quality
S250
100%($250)
0%(SO)
Certlficafon No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
,
III(S): For public or commercial
development,if General water Quality
S400
100% (S400)
0 % (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Cerfrication No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and
S400
60% (S240)
40% (5160)
_
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to water
quality or aquatic life:
III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
540
60% (5240)
40% (SI60)
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling andfor excavation of more
S475
60% (S285)
40% (SI90)
than one acre of wetlands andfor
open water areas:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Ocracoke Island Frontal dune adjacent to NC 12,
between 1.73 miles and 3.71 miles south of the Hatteras ferry terminal, in Hyde County
Photo Index - 2000: Not Available
State Plane Coordinates: x 2953641
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
1995: Not Available
y: 532730 GPS: Rover File # X110720A-I
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit-10/29/2002 & 11/7/2002
Was Agent Present - YES (Clay Willis, 10/29/02)
PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received as complete - 11/15/2002
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Hyde County
Land Classification from LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Ocean Erodible Area
(C) Water Dependent: No
(D) Intended Use: Public- NC DOT Interim Roadway Protection
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - NC 12, Natural and Constructed Dunes
Planned - NC 12, Natural and Constructed Dunes
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 6-9 feet
Source: CRC's Long Term Annual Shoreline Change Rates updated 1992
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
Excavated Filled Other
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non- Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other - Upland Sand Dunes
9,720 sq. ft.
144,230 sq. ft.
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 153,950 sq. ft. 3.53 acres
(E) Total area disturbed by project: 153,950 sq. ft. 3.53 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: No
(G) Water Classification: SB
(H) Open for Shellfishing: No (project is all on high ground)
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to reconstruct
primary dune in 7 locations, totaling approximately 2378 lineal feet, with dredged spoil sand, over
blown sand and over washed sand, adjacent to N.C. 12 and install sand fence on the ocean side of
5 of these reconstructed dunes. NC DOT is also proposing to install sand fence in 2 locations not
proposed for reconstruction.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — Dune Reconstruction- Hyde Co.
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The 9 locations of this proposal are east of and adjacent to NC 12 from 1.73 miles to 3.71 miles
southwest of the Hatteras -Ocracoke Ferry Terminal on Cape Hatteras National Seashore (CHNS)
property on Ocracoke Island in Hyde County, North Carolina. Although the majority of the
project is located on CHNS property, the NC DOT has a 150-foot right-of-way for NC 12, and
has applied for a special use permit from CHNS. The entire project is located within the Ocean
Erodible Area AEC. The long term average annual erosion rate is 6 feet from 1.73 to
approximately 2.2 miles southwest of the Hatteras -Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and 9 feet in the
remainder of the project area. Breaks in the dune system along NC 12 have, occurred due to ocean
overwash during Tropical Storm Gustay. Locations 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 detailed in the application
package are o'verwash areas that have essentially changed the frontal dune to a broad, flat,
sparsely vegetated area lacking the height and configuration typical of frontal dunes. Although
locations 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 are approximately 10-20 percent vegetated, they are not stable and the
elevation of the dune has been reduced to allow overwash during relatively minor storms.
Locations 3, 5, 8 and 9 are relatively narrow areas 15-79 feet wide, unstable and void of
vegetation, where the ocean has breached the primary dune.
Location 1 is approximately 1267 feet in length beginning 1.73 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of -the adjacent stable dune is approximately 63 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 45 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 10 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 2 is approximately 422 feet in length beginning 2.03 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 50 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 50 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 4 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 3 is approximately 52 feet in length beginning 2.15 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 50 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 25 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 8 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 4 is approximately 739 feet in length beginning 2.24 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 45 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 39 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 8 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 5 is approximately 79 feet in length beginning 2.51 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 52 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 30 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 15 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 6 is approximately 422 feet in length beginning 2.59 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 65 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 9 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 21 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — Dune Reconstruction — Hyde County
PAGE 3
Location 7 is approximately 686 feet in length beginning 2.76 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 52 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 33 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 8 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 8 is approximately 15 feet in length beginning 3.46 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune. is approximately 55 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 12 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 165 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Location 9 is approximately 15 feet in length beginning 3.71 miles southwest of the Hatteras -
Ocracoke Ferry Terminal and the width of the adjacent stable dune is approximately 50 feet with
the water ward edge approximately 17 feet from MHW and the landward edge of the dune
approximately 165 feet from the asphalt of NC 12.
Vegetation onsite is typical of this zone and includes Sea Oats, American Beach Grass and
Pennywort. Sand has overwashed and overblown onto the road and road shoulders at all locations
except 8 and 9, which are 165 feet from N.C. 12. Primary dunes in all locations, excluding
Location 8), have previously been reconstructed or reshaped under CAMC Major Permit 135 -93.
The proposal is to reconstruct approximately 2,378 feet of primary dunes in overwash locations 2,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 by adding dredge spoil fill after utilizing overwashed and overblown sand from
the 10-foot road shoulder along NC 12. The reconstructed dunes would be filled and shaped to
closely resemble the corresponding dunes at each end of the overwashed areas. After
reconstruction of the dunes, sand fence would be installed at over wash locations 1 through 7 on
the ocean side dune base in 10-foot sections spaced 7 feet apart and facing northeast (running from
southeast to northwest). Locations 1-7 are proposed to be planted with 80% American Beach
Grass and 20% Sea Oats on 18" centers.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the reconstruction of these 7 areas of dune overwashed by Tropical Storm Gustav
would result in the filling of approximately 144,230 square feet of upland sand dune and the
excavation of approximately 9,720 square feet of upland road shoulder. Installation of the sand
fence sections facing the northeast winds should trap sand from blowing across the dunes and
reinforce the reconstructed dunes. The removal of sand from the road shoulders of N.C. 12 would
eliminate the natural migration of the dune sand that is naturally forming a small secondary dune
north of N.C. 12.
NC DOT has reduced the Ocean Erodible Area AEC impacts associated with this proposal by not
disturbing vegetated dunes, allowing no heavy machinery on vegetated dunes or water ward of the
ocean side dune toe and by installing the sand fence using hand tools. The primary use of this site
will be for short-term protection of N.C. 12.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 3.53 acres.
Bill Arrington — Morehead Regional Office — November 18, 2002

es SW(o�
l
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 2002
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
Attention: Bill Arrington
The purpose of this letter is to request a CAMA major permit for the dune work on Ocracoke
Island. The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to reconstruct dunes and erect sand
fencing in an attempt to stabilize existing eroded dunes on Ocracoke Island. The current state of the eroded
dunes is the result of Tropical Storm Gustav that impacted the coastal area on 09/10/02. The general area of
the proposed work begins 1.7 miles from the ferry dock and ends 3.71 miles from the ferry dock. There are
a total of 9 locations within a 2-mile area that need dune reconstruction. These 9 locations are detailed in a
summary provided with this letter. The reconstructing of the dune areas will involve the placement of
approved sand in designated areas. This sand will be shaped in coordination with the permit drawings that
are provided and as was discussed in an on -site meeting between the Division of Coastal Management ,
(DCM), National Park Service and NCDOT representatives in September of 2002. There will be no
disturbance of existing vegetated dunes. The newly constructed dunes will be at the same height of the
existing dune on either side and tied in so the dune is continuous. Sprigging of the rebuilt dunes will take
place immediately after the dune reconstruction is finished or during the most productive time to plant. This
will be done with 80 % American beach grass and 20% sea oats. The sand fence will be installed using hand
tools such as a sledgehammer, etc. The bundles of sand fence will be moved by means of a small tractor of
ATV four wheeler. A general work plat has been included with this letter to show the layout of the sand
fence placement. This work will be done in accordance with the approved guidelines established and
provided by the National Park Service and the Division of Coastal Management. Consultation with the
National Park Service and the Division of Coastal Management will be taken during the life of the project.
In order to prevent any detrimental effects on protected animals that use the ocean shoreline, this work will
be done in a timely manner and scheduled in coordination with the DCM and the Park Service. A special
use permit from the National Park Service is being acquired along with this CAMA major permit to conduct
this work. If any additional information is needed, please call Clay Willis at 252-482-5889.
Sincerely,
Don Conner
Division One Engineer
Cla Willis
Division One Environmental Officer
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Cc: Allen Russell
_.;1.:
Sand Dune Reconstruction and Sand Fence Placement Location Description
Note: There are nine locations that work is being proposed in. The locations are measured
in miles from the Hatteras Ferry Dock.
Location - 1.73 miles from the ferry dock to 1.97 miles. Total work area length is 11 H \ ; -�U n e 'i S '
1267 feet. At this location NCDOT is proposing to erect sand fencing and vegetation
I,,tc, (.O3'
sprigging. so/zc)sE Xilp•7'2o A
Ou na. Pvrt. to
Location — 2.03 miles from the ferry dock to 2.11 miles. Total work area length is 422
feet. At this location NCDOT is proposing dune reconstruction, vegetation sprigging
n ,,� i, ,
and sand fence placement. I,1 0 -7 I;IfI ') - g
b-,, e - ,,v r y.
J) Location — 2.15 miles from the ferry dock to 2.16 miles. Total work area length is 52
m1+w - o.."e
feet. At this location NCDOT is proposing sand fence placement and vegetation
ti�t•z s ` .
sprigging. X %\6-lTZo C
b ,"=-Prt
D4 _Location-2.24 miles from the ferry dock to 2.38 miles. Total work area length is 739 YnLA W -
feet. At this location NCDOT is proposing dune reconstruction, vegetation sprigging
�� ` LA 5
and sand fence placement. X 11 0 7 z o iu
t 6'
3� Location — 2.51 miles from the ferry dock to 2.52 miles. Total work area length is 79feet.
At this location proposing is dune reconstruction, vegetation sprigging
z st
and sand fenceof
placement. I iC)-7 o
_ P t s
,,6 Location — 2.59 miles from the ferry dock to 2.67 miles. Total work area length is 422
feet.
m.1 w - c,: "z 9'
At this location NCDOT is proposing dune reconstruction, vegetation sprigging
and sand fence placement. X 11 0rl zo 1=
ls.lt - pv.+ ZI,
JLocation — 2.76 miles from the ferry dock to 2.89 miles. Total work area length is 686
maw_. n."e .33'
feet. At this location NCDOT is proposing dune reconstruction, vegetation sprigging�t
and sand fence placement. X 1 t o •1 c
r b
8) Location — 3.46 miles from the ferry dock. Total work area length is approximately 15
feet. Rebuild dune in small washout area. X I I U 7 d0 4
Wo Q9 Location — 3.71 miles from the ferry dock. Total work area length is approximately 15
feet. Rebuild dune in small washout area.
X 1 I o -7
so-'
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton
State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any)
Ocracoke Dune Reconstruction
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of laudowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
b. City, town, community or landmark
Ocracoke
c. Street address or secondary road number
NC 12
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Atlantic Ocean
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Ocean Dune Reconstruction, Vegetation Sprigging,
and Sand Fence Placement
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? maintenance
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. The purpose of this project is to
stabilize the ocean front dune system in order to
protect NC 12 from washing out. This work will
be accomplished by hauling sand in and placing it
with excavators, backhoes, and front end loaders.
This will rebuild the dunes where they had
washed out.
a. County
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract length of area is approximately
0.90 miles
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MI-IW or NWL
6 feet
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
CrB (Corolla) sand, BeE (Beaches) sand
e. Vegetation on tract sparse beachgrass, penny wort,
seashore elder
f. Man-made features now on tract None
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Consult the local land use plan)
X Conservation
_ Developed
Rural
_ Transitional
_ Community
X Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Park Service Property, NCDOT right-of-way
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes _ No
(AHaclr zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? _ Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? _ Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other _
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) None
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I V white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.

Form DCM-MP-1
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name N/A
Address _
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA Permit 135-93 issued 1993, Permit
modification to 135-93 issued 1999.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 15 day of October, 2002.
Print Name Clay Willis
Signature `j,(
LandowneforkithorizedAgent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X_ DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
Channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
Basin
Boat
Ramp
Rock
Groin
Rock
Breakwater
c} � her
A e(Excluding
9.t1 shoreline
tli, stabilization)
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards None
b. Type of material to be excavated None
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes X No
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards None f
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
a.
MATERIAL N/A
(See Attachment)
Location of disposal area N/A
there will be no disposal of material
b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to disposal area? N/A
_ Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
rel
Will a disposal
maintenance? _
If yes, where?
area be available for future
Yes No N/A
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? N/A
Yes No If yes,
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes _ No N/A
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap Sand Dune
b. Length Approximately 0.90 miles
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
approximateey 200 feet 6c ti• J
0`� . Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NW�y
approximately 300 feet 6 t /n, n � �,�/
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Dunes washed out during TS Gustav 09/10/02
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material N/A
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level NONE
(1) Ripmp
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
NCDOT will use approximately 5,000 cubic yards
of approved sand for the dune reconstruction.
i. Source of fill material N/A
Hatteras Inlet Dredge spoil site located beside the
Ocracoke to Hatteras ferry terminal
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes _ No
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
None
(2) Dimensions of fill area N/A
(3) Purpose of fill N/A
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for erosion control will be
implemented in necessary locations
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Excavator, Front end loader, backhoe, dump trucks
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Applicant or Project Name
Sign re
October 15, 2002
Date
Revised 03/95

Ocracoke info
Subject: Ocracoke info
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:34:06 -0800
From: Clay Willis <[e-mail]>
Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation
To: Bill Arrington <[e-mail]>
Bill,
Attached to this e-mail are the estimates for the
disturbed/filled area at each site for the proposed dune work on
Ocracoke Island. These estimates are based on a 60 feet base
width of the dune and 10 feet of road shoulder disturbance where
needed. Most of this work will occur within the DOT right-of-way.
If you need any additional information for this permit please let
me know. I will be sending you a hard copy of this letter also.
I spoke with the Marshall Collins family this morning and
they supposed to be faxing me a letter today stating they have nc
problem with the pier placement on the boardwalk project.
Have you heard anything from the COE on the Swan Quarter
Ferry?
Thanks,
Clay
Name: disturbedarea.doe
rdisturbedarea.doc Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
u Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
1 1 / 18/02 9:49

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �`r LCLu wnxrzxlvi N
DATE 10/16/2002
DIVISION 01 OFFICE113 55-lose STATE TREASURER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
EDENTON, NC 27932 AIRPORT DRIVE, SUITE 100 5B1 PAYABLE AT PAR THROUGH FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Pay
♦ r O I I I r r r r I r r s. I* I♦ r r I♦ r M r r r♦+ r* r r.
0
';4a1w„i�a ai�yiy�,+�i Ioull uu.:mo`.rmao xcM x110'xA:t
Pay NCDENR, CAMA
to the 3411 ARENDELL ST.
Order of P.O. BOX 769
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 48557
Q
11'0000878211' r:053110594r: iim00omr.4111'

LT
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
November 18, 2002
Clay VVillis, Division Environmental Officer
NC Department of Transportation Division 1
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
Edenton, North Carolina 27032
Dear Mr. VVillis,
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receiptof your application for State
approval for the reconstruction of dunes and the installation of sand fence adjacent to N.C. 12 on
Ocracoke Island in Hyde County, North Carolina. The additional information requested was
received on November 15, 2002, and appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The
projected deadline for making a decision is January 28, 2002. An additional 75-day review period
is provided by law when such time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been
notified of a final action by the initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review period
extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review.
However, an additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at
the proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along the roadway
where it can be observed from the road. An example would be: nailing the notice card to a
telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way near the project. Failure to post this notice could
result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by
the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify
me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing
agencies.
Sincerely,
(02�Bill Arringto
D.O.T. Field Representative,
NC Division of Coastal Management
VVLA
Enclosure
cc: Charles Jones
Doug Huggett
Terry Moore, District Manager
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagernent.net
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

LAMA PERMIT
APPLIED FOR
PROJECT- 04-"Lelake- D" .t P% 9- C! ark & 4r"okL
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH Dqc-. 18. 2400:L-
APPLICANT:
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
I

LL
E2
ca
I
f0
Q

-
r
y
>
t
Yr
Green
a�
Fr1
:'•
:
?stand
i' •z 1'.'
,Y•
-
Isla
d hT
Club
�(
CQL•) r. /.... /
���TF i r r�j [ > �� ;
Apt>°�S`
gar.
rc.
•�ryi
n Ha rrtock
9 ;_�
1a J' Dune
Reconstruction and Sand Fence
Project Area (1.7 miles to
3.71 miles from the Ferry Dock)
FAA 1.73 - FAB 1.97 miles --- SAND
FENCE = 0.24 MILES (1267.2
FEET)
R
FAC 2.03 -FAD 2.11 miles ---DUNE
RECONSTRUCTION &SAND
FENCE = 0.08 MILES (422.4
FEET)
y
' ry '
FAE
2.15 - FAF 2.16 mils --- SAND
FENCE = 0.01 MILES (52.8 FEET)
•`
•; =
IFAG 2.24 - FAH 2.38 miles --- DUNE
RECONSTRUCTION & SAND
FENCE = 0.14 MILES (739.2 FEET)
FAI 2.514 - FAJ 2.529 miles ---
DUNE RECONSTRUCTION & SAND
FENCE = 0.015 MILES (79:2
FEET) r.
FAK 2.69 - FAL 2.67 miles --- D II
NE RECONSTRUCTION & SAND
FENCE = 0.08 MILES (422.4 FEET)
'
IAM
2.76 - FAN 2.99 miles --- DUNE
RECONSTRUCTION & SAND
FENCE = 0.13 MILES (606.4 FEET)
FAD
3.46 --- REBUILD SMALL WASHOUT
FAP'3.71
REBUILD SMALL WASHOUT

Sprig
Proposed
Proposed Dune
3:1
...
NC 12 _
E— ±1o,
Existing
Dune r
r.
NOTE: Dune height to be 10' - 12' (or match the mean dune elevation)
- C
(J
NC Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
COUNTY: Hyde
QUAD:
BASIN: Tar -Pamlico
PROJECT: Dune Repair
DATE: October 01, 2002
NTS
TYPICAL SECTION of

NC 12
�� 1 pSAND FENCE
�,y1•ov �� Q, a� 1 o-�z�•.evt7
low o"no��
10. \
Proposed
Sand Fence
NC12
Cross Section
Proposed
Sand Fence
C.,i ..� t.vl•�
Toe of Dune
Top of Dune
Northeast
Wind
Ocean

Stan
Fenc
Existing Sac
SAND FENCE TYPICAL
i not r:t1Ke
^-w Fence
ples
a
is
NTS
c:.
c�

21.x 4" S
Untreate
NTS
SAND FENCE TYPICAL
Cross Section View
B53 4" <
..OK— Northew _
Wind
Standard
Fence
Ling Sand

ppl'
SPRIGGING
The Contractor shall sprig the dune with one sprig of vegetation on 18"
centers at the following rates: 80% American Beachgrass (Ammophila
breviligulata), 20% Sea Oats (Uniola paniculata). Plants should be planted at
least 6" deep in the winter and at least 8" deep in the spring. Fertilizer shall be
18-6-6 at a rate of 400 lbs. per acre. Existing vegetation shall not be disturbed
(where possible). No equipment shall be allowed on the ocean side beach of the
dunes other wise approved by NCDOT or USF&W. The types of plants, fertilizer,
and the rates of application shall be as stated above unless otherwise directed by
the Engineer. Payment, for the all the above work, will be under "Sprigging" per
Acre.
SAND FENCE
The Contractor shall install a sand fence where staked (in the field) along
the existing sand dune. The fence maybe used to prevent damage to the new
Sprigs. Standard wooden (2"x 4"x 8' non -treated) studs shall be used as post
every 5' and the fence shall be standard wooden sand (or sometime called snow)
fence. The fence shall be attached to the studs with approved galvanized (cow
fence) staples. The existing vegetation shall not be disturbed (where possible).
No equipment shall be allowed on the dune, ocean side beach, or other
vegetated area unless other wise approved by NCDOT or US Wildlife Service.
Location of fence placement will be staked in the field by NCDOT or US Wildlife
personal. Payment, for the all the above work and materials, will be under "Sand
Fence" per linear foot.

Fill associated with the Dune Construction on Ocracoke Island
Site
1
2
Be innin
1.73 miles
2.03 miles
Endin
1.97 miles
2.11 miles
Total Site Len th
1267 feet
422 feet
Total Disturbed Area
0
25320 s . ft. 0.58 acres)
3
2.15 miles
2.16 miles
52 feet
0
4
2.24 miles
2.38 miles
739 feet
44340 s . ft. (1.02 acres
5
2.51 miles
2.52 miles
79 feet
5530 s . ft. (0.13 acres)
6
2.59 miles
2.67 miles
422 feet
29540 s . ft. 0.68 acres)
7
2.76 miles
2.89 miles
686 feet
48020 s . ft. (1.10 acres
8
3.46 miles
3.46 miles
15 feet
600 s . ft. (0.01 acres)
9
3.71 miles
3.71 miles
15 feet
600 s . ft. (0.01 acres)
Note- Site 1 and 3 will not require any earthen fill to be placed within the AEC. These two sites
will only require sand fence placement and sprigging.
- Beginning and ending measurements are taken from the ferry terminal at the northern end
of the island.

r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., secretary
February 4, 2003
Mr. Clay Willis
Environmental Officer
N.C. Department of Transportation
113 Airport Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Dear Mr. Willis:
This letter is with reference to your application for a Coastal Area Management Act
Major Development permit. The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to
reconstruct primary dune in seven locations, totaling approximately 2378 lineal feet, with
dredged spoil sand, over blown sand and over washed sand, adjacent to N.C. 12 and install
sand fence on the ocean side of five of these reconstructed dunes. N.C. Department of
Transportation is also proposing to install sand fence in two locations not proposed for
reconstruction in Ocracoke, North Carolina in Hyde County.
Although processing of the application is nearing completion, additional time is
needed for this office to complete the review and make a decision on your request.
Therefore, it is necessary that the standard review time be extended. An additional 75 days is
provided by G.S. 113A-122(c) which would make April 14, 2003 the new deadline for
reaching a decision on your request. However, we expect to take action prior to that time and
will do so as soon as possible. In the interim, if you have any questions on the status of your
application, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Cathy Brittingham
Transportation Project Coordinator
cc: Bill Arlington, DCM
DCM, Morehead City
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http://www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

C, � � GG4 I y 40
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 4, 2002
Mr. Bill Arrington
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Highway 24
Heston Plaza II
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Dear Mr. Arrington:
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Request for Comments for the Proposed NC 12 Interim Improvements to the
Ocracoke Island Hot Spot, Hyde County, TIP No. R-3116A, State Project
No. 8.1080901
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is preparing an
Environmental Assessment for proposed interim improvements to NC 12 on Ocracoke Island.
The NEPA/404 merger process, which has been mutually adopted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the Federal Highway Administration, and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, will guide this study.
This project is part of a larger project described in the Draft 2004 — 2010 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) as "Ocracoke to South Terminal of Oregon Inlet Bridge Planning
and Environmental Studies for Maintaining the Roadway, ID Number R-3116." This project
(TIP R-3116A) covers only the interim work on the portion of NC 12 on Ocracoke Island. The
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to provide interim protection
to an approximate four -mile section of NC 12 on Ocracoke Island for a period of up to 15 years,
until a long-term solution to the road's vulnerability is implemented.
The following paragraphs provide summary descriptions of the general characteristics of
the project area, the project purpose and need, natural resources issues, and project schedule.
General Characteristics of the Project Area
The project area begins approximately one-half mile (0.8 kilometer) southwest of the
Hatteras Ferry terminal and extends approximately four miles (6.4 kilometers). The entire
project corridor is located in Hyde County, within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore. NC 12
is both an important transportation corridor and a threatened roadway. Beach erosion and severe
storms continually decrease the distance between NC 12 and the Atlantic Ocean. The
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
TRANSPORTATK)N BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1 SOUTH W I MINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

northeastern section of NC 12 on Ocracoke Island, beginning approximately one-half mile
(0.8 kilometer) southwest of the Hatteras Ferry terminal, is frequently subjected to overwash,
flooding, and closure during moderate to severe storm events. The erosion resulting from such
storms has eliminated most of the dunes that protect the highway from overwash. Figure 1
illustrates the affects of storms on the roadway.
Purpose and Need
Purpose
The purpose of the proposed action is to implement interim measures to maintain the
integrity and viability of the transportation system (movement of people, goods, and services)
with minimal interruption of traffic service due to a moderate storm event at the Ocracoke Island
Hot Spot for a period of 10-15 years until a long-term solution is in place.
Definition of terms
Ocracoke Island Hot Spot:
NC 12, beginning at a point approximately 4.5 miles (7.24 km) south of the Hatteras
Ferry Terminal on Ocracoke Island and extending northward for approximately 4 miles
(6.44 km).
Moderate Storm:
A Hurricane Dennis or Ash Wednesday equivalent storm.
Figure 1. Aerial photograph showing the overwash of NC-12 on Ocracoke Island.

Viability:
Able to safely work to restore temporary access within 48 hours and ultimately to
approximately the same level of service (July 2002).
Summary of Need
An approximate four -mile (6.4-kilometer) section of NC 12 on Ocracoke Island, immediately
south of the Hatteras Ferry terminal, is vulnerable to frequent overwash and flooding from
the Atlantic Ocean. When this occurs, this section of NC 12 is impassable, leaving the
Village of Ocracoke, at the southwest end of the island, without access to Hatteras Island.
The frequent overwash requires continual maintenance of the road and threatens the viability
of the highway's current location.
2. NC 12 is the principal connection to the mainland for the 800 permanent residents of
Ocracoke Island. Goods trucked to the island come via the Hatteras Ferry and NC 12.
3. Ocracoke Island is a popular vacation and tourist destination with approximately 300 rental
houses and 2,500 commercial rooms available. Over 75 percent of the visitors to Ocracoke
Island come onto the island via NC 12 and the Cape Hatteras ferry.
4. Visitors and residents rely on NC 12 and its connection with the Hatteras Ferry for
evacuation during serious storm events.
Natural Resources
The project corridor is located on Ocracoke Island in the Outer Coastal Plain or
Tidewater physiographic province of North Carolina. Ocracoke Island is one of a chain of barrier
islands known as the Outer Banks that, in the vicinity of the project, separate the Atlantic Ocean
from the Pamlico Sound. Ocracoke Island is separated from Portsmouth Island to the south by
Ocracoke Inlet and from Hatteras Island to the north by Hatteras Inlet.
The project area is a narrow, undeveloped section of barrier island characterized by bands
of natural vegetation zonation oriented parallel with the ocean shoreline. A relatively
unvegetated beach of fine sand extends from the surf zone up to the base of the primary dune
system. This barren, supra -tidal beach zone varies in width from 50 to 150 feet in width. The
primary dune line may reach a height of 30 feet, but is subject to constant reformation by wind
and storm tides. The dunes vary in width from 50 to 150 feet and support scattered grass and
herbaceous vegetation. Soundward the dunes is a field of low dunes grading to emergent
shrub/marsh grass complex that extends west into the emergent estuarine marsh fringing the
Pamlico Sound.
Jurisdictional areas within the project corridor include salt marsh creeks, emergent salt
marsh, emergent brackish marsh, and salt shrub assemblages. All jurisdictional areas within the
project corridor are considered to be of high value.
Natural Heritage Program (NHP) records indicate no documented occurrences of
federally protected species within the project corridor. The nearest documented federally
protected species are historic loggerhead sea turtle nests at two locations along the ocean beach
adjacent to the east side of the project corridor.

4
fi
National Seashore staff indicated that seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) has
occurred in the recent past on the ocean side of NC- 12 near the southern end of the project area.
These plants were believed to have arrived in sand used by NCDOT to repair a protected dune
line. These plants disappeared in 2001 as the result of ocean washover during a storm. No
individuals of this species are currently known from the project corridor.
NHP records indicate only one occurrence of a state listed species within the project
corridor and eight occurrences of state listed species within one mile of the project corridor. The
occurrence within the project corridor is beaked spikerush (Eleocharis rostellata), which is listed
by the state as Significantly Rare. This occurrence is within 1,000 feet of the southern end of the
project corridor on the sound side of NC-12. The spikerush typically occurs in brackish marsh,
and brackish marsh occurs frequently within the project corridor. No beaked spikerush was
observed during the site visit, but we conducted no detailed surveys for this species.
An historic wading bird rookery occurrence is located approximately 500 feet from the
southern end of the project corridor, on the sound side of NC-12, within an area known as the
"pony pen." Prior to 1984, this rookery supported nesting great egrets (Ardea alba) and black -
crowned night -herons (Nycticorax nycticorax). Neither of these species is state or federally
listed; however, they are commonly associated with state listed species in nesting colonies.
Project Schedule
Interagency scoping for this project has taken place through the Outer Banks Task Force.
In addition, the NEPA/404 Merger Team at a meet held on July 31 approved the project's
Purpose and Need. This letter constitutes solicitation for scoping comments related to this
project and notification of the start of the study. To allow us to evaluate fully the impacts of the
proposed project, please'respond in writing by November 18, 2002, concerning any beneficial or
adverse impacts related to the interests of your agency. If applicable, please identify any permits
or approvals that may be required by your agency.
The contractor is currently conducting a vulnerability study within the project corridor to
model the potential impacts of future storms on the road. Following the vulnerability study, the
next step in the study process will be to select one or more alternatives for further study. The
target completion date for the federal Environmental Assessment is July 2004.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Mr. John Wadsworth,
Project Development Engineer, at [phone], extension 209.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
regor Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
GJT/plr
Attachment