DEN-Gospel, Bruce

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
August 31, 1998
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199801108
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, North Carolina 28584
Dear Mr. Goepel:
By copy of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources letter to you of July 29, 1998, we have learned that State
authorization for you to construct an elevated wood/concrete boat ramp in
Bogue Sound, Cedar Point, Carteret County, North Carolina, has been denied.
Under the administrative rules of our regulatory program, denial of required
State authorization precludes favorable consideration of a Federal permit.
Accordingly, your Department of the Army (DA) application is hereby denied,
and your file has been retired.
If you wish to continue to pursue a DA permit, you must obtain the
required State authorization. In the event you obtain the authorization, we
will reopen your permit file, and continue to process your application. After
the file is reopened, any issues raised during the public review process must
be addressed before a permit can be issued.
Mr. Jeff Richter of my staff is available to answer any questions you
may have or to help you in developing a revised plan. Mr. Richter may be
reached at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Division
Enclosure

Copies Furnished (without enclosures):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North
Fisheries Service
Carolina 28516
Mr. William Cox, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. M. Ted Tyndall, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Two
151-B Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1998
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This letter is in response to your application for permits under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) and the state dredge and fill law to develop a boat launch facility at
your property, off of Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point, on Lot 1, Sunset Drive in Plantation Shores
Subdivision. Processing of the application, which was received on March 611998 and for which
notice of extended review was provided on May 30,1998, is now complete. Based on a joint state
and Federal agency, local government and public input review, the Division of Coastal
Management has made the following findings:
1) The proposed launching ramp and service pier is located on a 50 foot wide lot
boarded along the water by a 20 foot fringe of coastal marsh, inland of which is
a grove of trees with heavy understory vegetation providing excellent protection
to the adjacent Outstanding Resources Waters (ORW) from upland runoff;
2) Much of the upland vegetation, trees and understory will be removed in site pre-
paration; and the coastal marsh, approximately 200-300 sq. ft., will be impacted,
possibly removed, by construction of and subsequent shading from the elevated
ramp;
3) Water depth at the end of the proposed ramp is unsatisfactory for use during
the full tidal range. The approximately 18" depth at low tide will lead to
inadvertent "kicking" or propeller wash of the soft mud bottom in the area
immediately offshore of the ramp and marsh fringe. Staff has also determined
that the soft bottom or "muck" is approximately three feet deep at the point
where the ramp slab would be positioned and that the "muck" would not
support the slab. The placement of the ramp and subsequent launching activities
would result in the excavation and displacement of bottom sediments;
4) Coastal marsh and undisturbed shallow water habitat is a vital component
of estuarine resources base, including fish and shellfish production;
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-768712728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]S
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- SOq RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
ataE +_.+_. �

Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 2
July 29, 1998
5) The 50 foot width of the lot is considered less than ideal for entering, turning, and
backing a vehicle and trailer with a total length of 35-45 feet. Additionally, parking
appears not to have been designated for the facility. Area residents have expressed
concern about parking taking place on the 30 foot wide subdivision road. Additionally,
the County has informed Division staff that "public use" of such project, if authorized,
would be prohibited under present zoning, etc;
6) During the course of the review, this office received objections from numerous area
citizens, including those owning property immediately adjacent the project site. The
concerns expressed by area residents are not necessarily justification for an unfavorable
action, but by law, citizen concerns must be considered. However, some of the
objections submitted to the record by the public are similar to those of Division staff
and other state agencies;
7) The Division of Marine Fisheries expressed objection to the project, as designed, due
primarily to predicted impacts to the marsh border and shallow water habitat;
8) It is noted that there are several public boat ramps in the area with the free Wildlife
Resources Commission ramp being less than 2 miles from the proposed project;
9) It is generally determined by the Division that the site selected for the launch facility
is inappropriate due to environmental impacts and use problems. The cumulative
effect of projects of this type must be considered by the Division in its decision -
making process;
10) It is the finding of the Division that the project, as proposed, is inconsistent with
the following partial listing of the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission:
a) T15A:07H.0205(c) - Management Objective (for coastal marsh). To conserve
and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic and aesthetic values...., b) 0205(d) - Use Standards..... Highest
priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of existing coastal wetlands,
c) .0208(a)(2)(A) - The location, design, and need for development, as well as
construction activities involved shall be consistent with the management objective,
d) .0208(a)(2)(B) .... the permit -letting authority .... shall find that the applicant
has selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse
impact upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal marshland.

d
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 3
July 29, 1998
Based on the foregoing finding, it is necessary that your application request be denied under
N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(8) which requires permit denial when a proposal is determined to be
inconsistent with the state standards or guidelines, and 113A-120(a)(10) which requires permit denial
when the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects inconsistent with the
guidelines.
If you wish to appeal this denial, you are entitled to a hearing. The hearing will involve
appearing before an Administrative Law Judge who listens to the evidence and arguments of both
parties and then makes a recommendation to the Coastal Resources Commission. Your request for
a hearing must be in the form of written petition, complying with the requirements of Chapter 150B
of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447 [phone] within 20 days from the
receipt of this letter. A copy of the petition should be filed with this office.
Also, you should be advised that as long as this state pemut denial stands, your project must
be deemed inconsistent with the N. C. Coastal Management Program, thereby precluding issuance
of Federal permits for this project. The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA)
gives the right to appeal this finding to the U. S. Secretary of Commerce, within 30 days of receipt
of this letter. Your appeal must be based on the grounds that the proposed activity is (1) consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the CZMA, or (2) is necessary in the interest of national security,
and thus, may be federally approved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Parker at 919/733-
2293, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
cc: Mr. Jeffrey Beloit, Director
OCR/NCAA
Silver Spring, MD
LTC. Terry R. Youngbluth
Corps of Engineers
Sincerely,
Donna D. Moffitt

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1998
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This letter is in response to your application for permits under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) and the state dredge and fill law to develop a boat launch facility at
your property, off of Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point, on Lot 1, Sunset Drive in Plantation Shores
Subdivision. Processing of the application, which was received on March 6, 1998 and for which
notice of extended review was provided on May 30,1998, is now complete. Based on a joint state
and Federal agency, local government and public input review, the Division of Coastal
Management has made the following findings:
1) The proposed launching ramp and service pier is located on a 50 foot wide lot
boarded along the water by a 20 foot fringe of coastal marsh, inland of which is
a grove of trees with heavy understory vegetation providing excellent protection
to the adjacent Outstanding Resources Waters (ORW) from upland runoff;
2) Much of the upland vegetation, trees and understory will be removed in site pre-
paration; and the coastal marsh, approximately 200-300 sq. ft., will be impacted,
possibly removed, by construction of and subsequent shading from the elevated
ramp;
3) Water depth at the end of the proposed ramp is unsatisfactory for use during
the full tidal range. The approximately 18" depth at low tide will lead to
inadvertent "kicking" or propeller wash of the soft mud bottom in the area
immediately offshore of the ramp and marsh fringe. Staff has also determined
that the soft bottom or "muck" is approximately three feet deep at the point
where the ramp slab would be positioned and that the "muck" would not
support the slab. The placement of the ramp and subsequent launching activities
would result in the excavation and displacement of bottom sediments;
4) Coastal marsh and undisturbed shallow water habitat is a vital component
of estuarine resources base, including fish and shellfish production;
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-768712728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 Oq POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 2
July 29, 1998
5) The 50 foot width of the lot is considered less than ideal for entering, turning, and
backing a vehicle and trailer with a total length of 35-45 feet. Additionally, parking
appears not to have been designated for the facility. Area residents have expressed
concern about parking taking place on the 30 foot wide subdivision road. Additionally,
the County has informed Division staff that "public use" of such project, if authorized,
would be prohibited under present zoning, etc;
6) During the course of the review, this office received objections from numerous area
citizens, including those owning property immediately adjacent the project site. The
concerns expressed by area residents are not necessarily justification for an unfavorable
action, but by law, citizen concerns must be considered. However, some of the
objections submitted to the record by the public are similar to those of Division staff
and other state agencies;
7) The Division of Marine Fisheries expressed objection to the project, as designed, due
primarily to predicted impacts to the marsh border and shallow water habitat;
8) It is noted that there are several public boat ramps in the area with the free Wildlife
Resources Commission ramp being less than 2 miles from the proposed project;
9) It is generally determined by the Division that the site selected for the launch facility
is inappropriate due to environmental impacts and use problems. The cumulative
effect of projects of this type must be considered by the Division in its decision -
making process;
10) It is the finding of the Division that the project, as proposed, is inconsistent with
the following partial listing of the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission: -
a) T15A:07H.0205(c) - Management Objective (for coastal marsh). To conserve
and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic and aesthetic values ...., b) 0205(d) - Use Standards..... Highest
priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of existing coastal wetlands,
c) .0208(a)(2)(A) - The location, design, and need for development, as well as
construction activities involved shall be consistent with the management objective,
d) .0208(a)(2)(B) .... the permit -letting authority .... shall find that the applicant
has selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse
impact upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal marshland.

Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 3
July 29, 1998
Based on the foregoing finding, it is necessary that your application request be denied under
N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(8) which requires permit denial when a proposal is determined to be
inconsistent with the state standards or guidelines, and 113A-120(a)(10) which requires permit denial
when the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects inconsistent with the
guidelines.
If you wish to appeal this denial, you are entitled to a hearing. The hearing will involve
appearing before an Administrative Law Judge who listens to the evidence and arguments of both
parties and then makes a recommendation to the Coastal Resources Commission. Your request for
a hearing must be in the form of written petition, complying with the requirements of Chapter 150B
of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447 [phone] within 20 days from the
receipt of this letter. A copy of the petition should be filed with this office.
Also, you should be advised that as long as this state permit denial stands, your project must
be deemed inconsistent with the N. C. Coastal Management Program, thereby precluding issuance
of Federal permits for this project. The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA)
gives the right to appeal this finding to the U. S. Secretary of Commerce, within 30 days of receipt
of this letter. Your appeal must be based on the grounds that the proposed activity is (1) consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the CZMA, or (2) is necessary in the interest of national security,
and thus, may be federally approved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Parker at 919/733-
2293, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Sincerely,
Donna D. Moffitt
cc: Mr. Jeffrey Beloit, Director
OCR/NCAA
Silver Spring, MD
LTC. Terry R. Youngbluth
Corps of Engineers

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1998
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This ,letter is in response to your application for permits under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) and the state dredge and fill law to develop a boat launch facility at
your property, off of Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point, on Lot 1, Sunset Drive in Plantation Shores
Subdivision. Processing of the application, which was received on March 6, 1998 and for which
notice of extended review was provided on May 30,1998, is now complete. Based on a joint state
and Federal agency, local government and public input review, the Division of Coastal
Management has made the following findings:
1) The proposed launching ramp and service pier is located on a 50 foot wide lot
boarded along the water by a 20 foot fringe of coastal marsh, inland of which is
a grove of trees with heavy understory vegetation providing excellent protection
to the adjacent Outstanding Resources Waters (ORW) from upland runoff;
2) Much of the upland vegetation, trees and understory will be removed in site pre-
paration; and the coastal marsh, approximately 200-300 sq. ft., will be impacted,
possibly removed, by construction of and subsequent shading from the elevated
ramp;
3) Water depth at the end of the proposed ramp is unsatisfactory for use during
the full tidal range. The approximately 18" depth at low tide will lead to
inadvertent "kicking" or propeller wash of the soft mud bottom in the area
immediately offshore of the ramp and marsh fringe. Staff has also determined
that the soft bottom or "muck" is approximately three feet deep at the point
where the ramp slab would be positioned and that the "muck" would not
support the slab. The placement of the ramp and subsequent launching activities
would result in the excavation and displacement of bottom sediments;
4) Coastal marsh and undisturbed shallow water habitat is a vital component
of estuarine resources base, including fish and shellfish production;
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-768712728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -SO%RECYCLED110 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

L�
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 2
July 29, 1998
5) The 50 foot width of the lot is considered less than ideal for entering, turning, and
backing a vehicle and trailer with a total length of 35-45 feet. Additionally, parking
appears not to have been designated for the facility. Area residents have expressed
concern about parking taking place on the 30 foot wide subdivision road. Additionally,
the County has informed Division staff that "public use" of such project, if authorized,
would be prohibited under present zoning, etc;
6) During the course of the review, this office received objections from numerous area
citizens, including those owning property immediately adjacent the project site. The
concerns expressed by area residents are not necessarily justification for an unfavorable
action, but by law, citizen concerns must be considered. However, some of the
objections submitted to the record by the public are similar to those of Division staff
and other state agencies;
7) The Division of Marine Fisheries expressed objection to the project, as designed, due
primarily to predicted impacts to the marsh border and shallow water habitat;
8) It is noted that there are several public boat ramps in the area with the free Wildlife
Resources Commission ramp being less than 2 miles from the proposed project;
9) It is generally determined by the Division that the site selected for the launch facility
is inappropriate due to environmental impacts and use problems. The cumulative
effect of projects of this type must be considered by the Division in its decision -
making process;
10) It is the finding of the Division that the project, as proposed, is inconsistent with
the following partial listing of the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission:
a) T15A:07H.0205(c) - Management Objective (for coastal marsh). To conserve
and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic and aesthetic values ...., b) 0205(d) - Use Standards..... Highest
priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of existing coastal wetlands,
c) .0208(a)(2)(A) - The location, design, and need for development, as well as
construction activities involved shall be consistent with the management objective,
d) .0208(a)(2)(B) .... the permit -letting authority .... shall find that the applicant
has selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse
impact upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal marshland.

Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 3
July 29, 1998
Based on the foregoing finding, it is necessary that your application request be denied under
N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(8) which requires permit denial when a proposal is determined to be
inconsistent with the state standards or guidelines, and 113A-120(a)(10) which requires permit denial
when the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects inconsistent with the
guidelines.
If you wish to appeal this denial, you are entitled to a hearing. The hearing will involve
appearing before an Administrative Law Judge who listens to the evidence and arguments of both
parties and then makes a recommendation to the Coastal Resources Commission. Your request for
a hearing must be in the form of written petition, complying with the requirements of Chapter 150B
of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447 [phone] within 20 days from the
receipt of this letter. A copy of the petition should be filed with this office.
Also, you should be advised that as long as this state permit denial stands, your project must
be deemed inconsistent with the N. C. Coastal Management Program, thereby precluding issuance
of Federal permits for this project. The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA)
gives the right to appeal this finding to the U. S. Secretary of Commerce, within 30 days of receipt
of this letter. Your appeal must be based on the grounds that the proposed activity is (1) consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the CZMA, or (2) is necessary in the interest of national security,
and thus, may be federally approved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Parker at 919/733-
2293, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Sincerely,
^` ) . l 44�
Donna D. Moffitt
cc: Mr. Jeffrey Beloit, Director
OCR/NCAA
Silver Spring, MD
LTC. Terry R. Youngbluth
Corps of Engineers

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1998
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This letter is in response to your application for permits under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) and the state dredge and fill law to develop a boat launch facility at
your property, off of Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point, on Lot 1, Sunset Drive in Plantation Shores
Subdivision. Processing of the application, which was received on March 6, 1998 and for which
notice of extended review was provided on May 30,1998, is now complete. Based on a joint state
and Federal agency, local government and public input review, the Division of Coastal
Management has made the following findings:
1) The proposed launching ramp and service pier is located on a 50 foot wide lot
boarded along the water by a 20 foot fringe of coastal marsh, inland of which is
a grove of trees with heavy understory vegetation providing excellent protection
to the adjacent Outstanding Resources Waters (ORW) from upland runoff,
2) Much of the upland vegetation, trees and understory will be removed in site pre-
paration; and the coastal marsh, approximately 200-300 sq. ft., will be impacted,
possibly removed, by construction of and subsequent shading from the elevated
ramp;
3) Water depth at the end of the proposed ramp is unsatisfactory for use during
the full tidal range. The approximately 18" depth at low tide will lead to
inadvertent "kicking" or propeller wash of the soft mud bottom in the area
immediately offshore of the ramp and marsh fringe. Staff has also determined
that the soft bottom or "muck" is approximately three feet deep at the point
where the ramp slab would be positioned and that the "muck" would not
support the slab. The placement of the ramp and subsequent launching activities
would result in the excavation and displacement of bottom sediments;
4) Coastal marsh and undisturbed shallow water habitat is a vital component
of estuarine resources base, including fish and shellfish production;
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-768712728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/I 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 2
July 29, 1998
5) The 50 foot width of the lot is considered less than ideal for entering, turning, and
backing a vehicle and trailer with a total length of 35-45 feet. Additionally, parking
appears not to have been designated for the facility. Area residents have expressed
concern about parking taking place on the 30 foot wide subdivision road. Additionally,
the County has informed Division staff that "public use" of such project, if authorized,
would be prohibited under present zoning, etc;
6) During the course of the review, this office received objections from numerous area
citizens, including those owning property immediately adjacent the project site. The
concerns expressed by area residents are not necessarily justification for an unfavorable
action, but by law, citizen concerns must be considered. However, some of the
objections submitted to the record by the public are similar to those of Division staff
and other state agencies;
7) The Division of Marine Fisheries expressed objection to the project, as designed, due
primarily to predicted impacts to the marsh border and shallow water habitat;
8) It is noted that there are several public boat ramps in the area with the free Wildlife
Resources Commission ramp being less than 2 miles from the proposed project;
9) It is generally determined by the Division that the site selected for the launch facility
is inappropriate due to environmental impacts and use problems. The cumulative
effect of projects of this type must be considered by the Division in its decision -
making process;
10) It is the finding of the Division that the project, as proposed, is inconsistent with
the following partial listing of the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission:
a) T15A:07H.0205(c) - Management Objective (for coastal marsh). To conserve
and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic and aesthetic values...., b) 0205(d) - Use Standards..... Highest
priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of existing coastal wetlands,
c) .0208(a)(2)(A) - The location, design, and need for development, as well as
construction activities involved shall be consistent with the management objective,
d) .0208(a)(2)(B) .... the permit -letting authority .... shall find that the applicant
has selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse
impact upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal marshland.

e�'
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 3
July 29, 1998
Based on the foregoing finding, it is necessary that your application request be denied under
N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(8) which requires permit denial when a proposal is determined to be
inconsistent with the state standards or guidelines, and 11 3A- 1 20(a)(1 0) which requires permit denial
when the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects inconsistent with the
guidelines.
If you wish to appeal this denial, you are entitled to a hearing. The hearing will involve
appearing before an Administrative Law Judge who listens to the evidence and arguments of both
parties and then makes a recommendation to the Coastal Resources Commission. Your request for
a hearing must be in the form of written petition, complying with the requirements of Chapter 150B
of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447 [phone] within 20 days from the
receipt of this letter. A copy of the petition should be filed with this office.
Also, you should be advised that as long as this state permit denial stands, your project must
be deemed inconsistent with the N. C. Coastal Management Program, thereby precluding issuance
of Federal pewits for this project. The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA)
gives the right to appeal this finding to the U. S. Secretary of Commerce, within 30 days of receipt
of this letter. Your appeal must be based on the grounds that the proposed activity is (1) consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the CZMA, or (2) is necessary in the interest of national security,
and thus, may be federally approved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Parker at 919/733-
2293, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Sincerely,
Donna D. Moffitt
cc: Mr. Jeffrey Beloit, Director
OCR/NCAA
Silver Spring, MD
LTC. Terry R. Youngbluth
Corps of Engineers

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Bruce Goepel
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot # 1, on Sunset Drive in the Plantation Shores Subdivision,
adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 160-27 N-6 1984: 31-1189 K-21 1995: 39-474 0-20
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2577400 Y: 342500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA k -b) F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-4-98 & 2-20-98
Was Applicant Present - yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 1-26-98 revised 3-6-98
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW,EW,PTA,
a Water Dependent:- -yes
(D) Intended Use: private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Exrsti -none
Planned,- none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - boat ramp, pier and access driveway with turn around
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'/yr
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Coastal Wetlands (Pier footprint)
(Elevated wood boat ramp footprint)
126 sq. ft.
252 ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
Open water (Pier footprint)
180 sq. ft
Concrete boat ram
180 sq. ft.
(C) Other
High ground (Pier footprint)
60 sq. ft.
(Wood boat ramp footprint)
360 sq. ft.
Driveway and turn around
1830 . ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2988 sq. ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes

,•
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROTECT SUMMARY: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat
ramp, a pier and gravel driveway.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project is located at lot #1 in the Plantation Shores
Subdivision in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County. The lot is 200' long x 50'
wide and is bordered on the south by a small slough off Bogue Sound, on the north by
Sunset Drive, to the east by a house and to the west by a mobile home. The applicant is
also the developer of Plantation Shores Subdivision which consists of 32 lots off NC
Hwy 24. The lot is basically cleared except for a border of oaks and small bushes which
average approx. 50' wide near the waters edge. Waterward of this border of trees there
is a fringe of Coastal Wetlands approx. 20' wide vegetated mainly with Spartina
alterniflora. The slough is approx 107' wide from water edge to water edge. Water
depths range from a minus 9" near the marsh edge to a minus 39" approx. 30' beyond
the edge of the marsh. Waters at the project site have been classified as SA and are
open to the harvesting of shellfish. This area of Bogue Sound is located within
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).
The applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp over the Coastal
Wetlands with a pier adjacent to the ramp. The boat ramp would be approx. 64' long x
12' wide. The portion of the ramp on high ground and over the Coastal Wetlands would
be elevated and constructed of wood. The approx. 14' long x 12' wide portion of the
ramp beyond the Coastal Wetlands would be concrete. A pier 60' long x 6' wide would
be built on the east side of the ramp. A gravel driveway would be constructed in the
center of the property from Sunset Drive to within 30' of the MHW line. Two turn
around areas measuring approx. 20' long x 18' wide would also be constructed.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed would result in some short term
increases in turbidity during the placement of pilings for the ramp and pier. Approx.
400 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be shaded by the construction of the ramp and
pier. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of shallow bottom habitat would be loss due to the placement
of the concrete boat ramp in the water. No excavation or fill is being proposed for the
installation of the boat ramp. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of open water area would be shaded
by the installation of the pier. The body of water at the project site is approx. 107' from
water to water. The pier would be located 15' from the riparian property line to the east
and 25' from the riparian property line to the west. The pier would extend 30' beyond
the edge of the Coastal Wetlands, but would not be beyond the existing pier located on
the adjacent property to the west. The pier would also be within the one third rule. The
applicant is not proposing any structures or any high ground improvements to the
property except for the gravel driveway and two turn around areas. The driveway and
turn around areas would terminate thirty feet from the MHW, and the remainder of the
area to the water would be grassed and seeded. There has been much concern raised by

4'
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
the neighbors and several letters written concerning whether the project is for private use
of the applicant or intended for the use of the subdivision the applicant is developing.
According to the Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) a public or commercial boat
ramp would not be consistent with the LUP. The installation of the gravel driveway and
turn around areas would increase the impervious area by 1830 sq. ft. The total built
upon area on this project would be 2,250 sq. ft. which is less than the 2,500 sq. ft.
which is allowed.
PREPARED BY: Charles O. Pigott
DATE: 3/17/98

N
A)
a
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL/PROCESSING RECORD
APPLICANT: Bruce Goepel COUNTY: Carteret
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Lot #1 on Sunset Drive, in Plantation Shores Subdivision, adjacent to Bogue Sound,
in the Town of Cedar Point
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: March 6, 1998
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached - NO To Be Forwarded - YES
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached - NO To Be Forwarded - YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Charles Pigott DIISTRI`C, FICE: Morehead
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIE REM
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED IN LEIGH: MARI, 9 1998FEE REC'D: $ ZLS 0 R
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: COAS*pA M@Niff# DATE: 4-1 U — S g�
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D: ----A
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: Qua v
DEED REC'D: �i
ON:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: S cCe — / d' 150 DAY DEADLINE: �(
MAIL OUT DATE: 1
{{ — T 4 STATE DUE DATE:
FEDERAL DUE DATE: S — )'O ' q 9 FED. COMMENTS REC'D:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE
DENY
DRAFT ON
AGENCY
DATE COMMENTS
OBJECTIONS
NOTES
RETURNED
YES NO
Coastal Management Dist. Office
Div. of Community Assistance
L
Land Quality Section
— _ q
Div. of Water Quality
_ I�
State Property fice
v. of Archives 6 History
Div. of Env. Health
-- -
Div. of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
_
Div. of Water Resources
V
Div. of Marine Fisheries
— (.

09•
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
John Parker
Charles Pigott/M. Ted Tyndall
RECEIVED
JUL 2 8 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Revised Field Recommendation for the Bruce Goepel CAMA Major Permit
Application, in Cedar Point, Carteret County
July 28, 1998
After an additional site visit, the field staff of the Morehead City Office would like to
offer the following additional comments on the applicant's proposal to construct a boat ramp
adjacent to a small slough off Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point. Although the applicant has stated
that he proposes no excavation in the area, our site visit. of July 17, 1998 revealed that the
substrate at the project site is a soft "muck" type bottom which is over 3 feet deep before any
resemblance of a solid bottom can be located. Construction of a concrete ramp would be
impossible without any substantial excavation and/or filling activities. Such activities would
unnecessarily impact both the marsh and the open waters of this highly productive system.
Therefore, the field staff continues to find the project inconsistent with the regulations
stated in the June 17, 1998 memorandum. And based on the nature and of the substrate found
during our July 17 field visit, the field staff strongly opposes the project. The project as
proposed would result in the direct impact of the m�"djazent.and remains inconsistent
with those rules stated earlier.
cc: Charles Jones
Jeff Richter, COE/Wihnington

MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
John Parker
Charles Pigott
RECEIVE:
JUN 18 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Comments and recommendations for the Bruce Goepel, CAMA Major Permit
Application, in Cedar Point, Carteret County
June 17, 1998
The applicant is proposing to construct a pier 60' long x 6' wide and also construct a 64'
long x 12' wide boat ramp. Approximately 21' of the proposed boat ramp would be over
Coastal Wetlands and would be constructed of wood while 14' into of the ramp would be
in the open water and would be constructed of concrete. Although the portion of the ramp
over Coastal Wetland is proposed to be elevated one would expect severe impacts and
possible destruction of the Coastal Wetlands from the shading effect. According to the
work plats furnished by the applicant water depths at the end of the ramp are a minus 28"
at Mean Low Water (MLW), and there is a 2.5' tidal difference. The shallow water depths
would make loading and launching of boats very difficult during periods of low tides
resulting in "gunning" the boat to get the boat on and off the trailer resulting in scouring of
the shallow bottom or undermining Coastal Wetlands cross the narrow slough.
Consequently, permitting the ramp would be passively permitting the excavation via
"kicking -out." This area is not designated as a Primary Nursery Area, but appears to be
highly productive and may be functioning as one. Such unauthorized (yet difficult to
enforce) activity could have significant impact on the resource value within the immediate
vicinity of the project. The lot is only 50' wide which will create a problem about turning
around and or backing boats a long distance to the boat ramp. Several neighbors have
raised the question as to whether or not the project is for the private use of the landowner
or is it in conjunction with the subdivision he is developing. If others are allowed to use the
ramp facility the problems outlined above would only be intensified.
Therefore, after reviewing the application in regards to the 7H Guidelines for development
within Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters, Public Trust Areas and the Estuarine
Shoreline, it appears that the project is inconsistent with the following Management
Objectives and Use Standards:
1) Management Objective --Coastal Wetlands .0205. "To conserve and manage
coastal wetlands so as to perpetuate their biological, social, economic and aesthetic
values; to coordinate and establish a management system capable of conserving
and utilizing coastal wetlands as a natural resource essential to the functioning of
the entire system."

Comments & Recommendations--Goepel/Carteret County
2) Use Standards --Coastal Wetlands .0206(d); Estuarine Waters .0206 (d); and
Public Trust Areas .0207 (d). "In every instance, the particular location, use, and
design, charctersitcs shall be in accord with the general use standards for coastal
wetlands, estuarine waters, and public trust areas described in Rule .0208 of his
Section."
3) General Use Standards .0208 (a)(2)(A). 'The location, design, and need for
development, as well as the construction activities involved shall be consistent with
the stated management objective." General Use Standards .0208 (a)(2)(B).
Before receiving approval for location of a use or development within these AECs,
the permit -letting authority shall find no suitable alternative site or location outside
of the AEC exists for the use or development and , further, that the applicant has
selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse impact
upon the productivity and biological integrity of coastal marshland, shellfish beds,
beds of submerged aquatic vegetation, spawning and nursery areas, important
nesting and wintering sites for waterfowl and wildlife, and important natural erosion
barriers (cypress fringes, marshes, clay soils)."
Therefore, based on the inconsistencies highlighted above I must recommend that the
permit be denied.
cc: Charles S. Jones
Ted Tyndall
Jeff Richter, COE

NCDENR
JAMES S. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
FI._ I
MCDEVITr
ROGER N. SCHECTER
DIRECTOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
RECEIVED
APR 2 8 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 18, 1998
TO: Kathy B. Vinson, District Planner
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Bruce Goepel
Project Location: Lot P in Plantation Shores S/D, on
Sunset Drive, adj. Bogue Sound, Town of
Cedar Point, Carteret County
Proposed Project: to construct an elevated wood boat ramp,
pier and gravel driveway
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 8, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed
project, please contact Charles Pigott at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: ✓ This agency has no o ection to the project aced.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
SIGNED2 3 (/ DATE
6
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA 11 151-8 HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAO CITY NC 28557
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER 14PER

1
MEMO
To: John Parker
From: Kathy Vinson
Subject: Consistency Determination, Major Permit Application, Bruce Goepel, Town of
Cedar Point, Carteret County
Date: April 24, 1998
Mr. Goepel proposes to construct an elevated wood boat ramp, a pier, gravel driveway and two turn
around areas on Lot #1, on Sunset Drive, in the Plantation Shores Subdivision, adjacent to Bogue
Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County.
Areas of Environmental Concern impacted by the proposed work include the Estuarine Shoreline,
Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters and Public Trust Areas. Waters of Bogue Sound at the project
site are classified as SA-ORW and are open to the harvesting of shellfish. The area is not a Primary
Nursery Area.
I have reviewed this project for consistency with the 1991 Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP)
Update, as amended September 24, 1993, and offer the following comments. (The Town of Cedar
Point relies on Carteret County for planning services and is included in the County Land Use Plan.)
The general area of the project is classified as Developed, while the AECs impacted by the proposal
are classified as Conservation.
The LUP discussion of allowed uses in Conservation classified AECs refers the reader to the policy
section of the Plan for the County's intentions regarding development in these areas.
The amended plan allows development in Coastal Wetlands which complies with the State's
minimum use standards unless the activity is specifically prohibited in the policy section of the plan.
I can find no policy in the amended plan which would prohibit the proposed ramp and pier.
Policies for Marine Resource Areas state the County's support for the Use Standards contained in
15A NCAC 711 for estuarine, public trust and ORW waters, with certain exceptions, none of which
appear to be applicable to this project. Marina and Floating Home Development Policies allow
docks and piers in ORW areas, consistent with state rules.
Policies which address Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Development Impacts on Resources
limit commercial uses in ORW Estuarine Shoreline areas to those that are water dependent and
which cannot function elsewhere or those which are supportive of commercial fishing. The LUP
also clearly states that where zoning exists, all uses must be consistent with established zoning. The
project area is zoned by Carteret County. Neighbors of the project site are concerned whether the
project is for the private use of Mr. Goepel or is intended for the use of the Plantation Shores
VY

John Parker
Page 2
April 24, 1998
Subdivision which he is developing. If the intended use of the project is commercial, as believed
by Mr. Goepel's neighbors, the commercial activity must be allowed by established zoning.
Determination of consistency with local zoning must be made by the Carteret County Planning
Office.
Provided that all local and state requirements can be met, including compliance with local zoning,
this project appears to be consistent with the amended 1991 Carteret County Land Use Plan.
cc: Charles Jones
Ted Tyndall
Charles Pigott
Katrina Marshall

AkT A
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
WAVNE MCDEVITT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
MAR 2 ) 1996
DMF-HABITAT
March 18, 1998
TO: Mr. Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Bruce Goepel
Project Location: Lot #1 in Plantation Shores S/D, on
Sunset Drive, adj. Bogue Sound, Town of
Cedar Point, Carteret County
Proposed Project: to construct an elevated wood boat ramp,
pier and gravel driveway
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 8, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed
project, please contact Charles Pigott at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
SIGNED _� ,� ` /gyp DATE f: jP r
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA II 151-8 HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED/10Yo POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
I174_6_,)350 _M.3Z11in35
TO: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
RCDENR
INV,9 NN ANT .No H.pl/i.( r1F.YY..1r lE4
FROM: David L. Taylor Vd'�
Central District, Manager
James J. Francesconi
Investigating Biologi
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review by the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
DATE: April 22, 1998
Applicant: Bruce Goepel
Project Location: Lot #1 in Plantation Shores S/D, on Sunset Drive, adj. Bogue Sound,
Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County.
Proposed Project: To construct an elevated wood boat ramp, pier and gravel driveway.
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) has reviewed the application
for work proposed by Bruce Goepel, reviewed the Field Investigation Report compiled by
CAMA, and conducted a site visit on April 6,.1998. The following comments by the NCDMF
are provided pursuant to General Statute 113-131. This agency objects to the project as proposed
for the following reasons and offers a recommendation for change. This agency will approve of
the project only if the recommended changes are incorporated.
1) The proposed ramp and pier's combined width of 18 ft., will negatively impact the
P. O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Af nnative Action a plcyer 50% recycled/ 10% post< sumer paper

Goepel cont.
approx. 378 sq.ft. of coastal wetlands. This project maximizes, instead of minimizes
the coverage of coastal wetlands. The ramp coverage will eventually kill the shaded
coastal wetland vegetation. 'ai
2) The coverage of coastal wetlands and the subsequent loss of the coastal wetland
vegetation will weaken the natural barrier to erosion. This violates T15A: 07H .0208
(a) (2) (B) and.0209 (e) (1). These Use Standards state: Before receiving approval
for location ... that the applicant has selected a combination of sites and designs that
will have a minimum adverse impact upon the productivity and biological integrity
of coastal marshland ... (.0208), and; all development projects, proposals, and designs
hall substantially preserve and not weaken or eliminate natural barriers to
erosion, ... (.0209).
The NCDMF cannot accept thism eject d suhmitted in this
application. ThoAventual destry&gp&.through shading of 378 sq. fr (Z t X t & of tal vegetated
wetlands is the principle reason for this recommendation for denial as this project is proposed.
Changes to the proposal which will allow approval would be raising the ramp where the lowest
beams of the ramp are a minimum of three feet above the top of the vegetation. Or, a pier
without the boat ramp is an example of a project that minimizes the loss of coastal wetland
vegetation.

-State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Preston P. Pate. Jr.. Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
FROM: P.A. Wojciechowski-14
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT
Bruce Goepel - Carteret County
'Aw
NCDENR
NonT .. CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
EN\'IHOIJr'IkNi AND NAm:RAL RFtiou icvs
23 April 1998
RECEIVED
22133W,
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Attached is the Division's reply for the above referenced project. If you have any questions,
please don't hesitate to contact me.
PAW/bc
permits\admin�pcoverdtr
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 27, 1998
��131
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
TO: P. A. "Ski" Wojciechowski
Submerged Lands Program Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
MAR 3 1 IM
G 'v F-HABITAT
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredg 11 Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Bruce oepel
LOCATION: Lot #1, on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated boat ramp, a pier, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or findings on the proposed project as it
relates to matters of public trust. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
contact John Parker at 733-2293 or the DCM field representative for the project. This form
should be used only for tracking and intra-agency commenting.
REPLY _� The instrument attached to the application covers the project area.
The instrument is a valid document which conveys property rights.
There are no known public trust conflicts.
There appears to be public trust conflicts.
It is recommended that changes be made to the project to eliminate
or reduce public trust conflicts as discussed in the attached
memorandum or on the reverse side of this reply.
Signed �� �{/�i Date ` Z
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEICH, NC 27611-7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEICH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 'AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, North Carolina 28584
Dear Mr. Goepel:
NCDENR
NO CAR U" DERRRTMEW OF
ENVIRONMENT MD N.auR RESOURCES
July 2, 1998
Subject: Permit No. SW8 980333
Goepel Land and Waterfront Improvements
General Permit Stormwater
Carteret County
The Wilmington Regional Office received the Stormwater Management Permit Application for Goepel
Land and Waterfront Improvements on April 21, 1998. Staff review of the plans and specifications
has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in
Title 15A NCAC 2H .1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW8 980333 dated July 2, 1998 , for the
construction of Goepel Land and Waterfront Improvements.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right
to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this
permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer
27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and
binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact either
me or Greg Stutts at [phone].
Sincerely,
C�..� CAL --
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
RSS/ges: S:\WQS\STORMWAT\PERMIT\980333.JUL RECEIVED
cc: Katrina Marshall, Carteret County Inspections JUL 0 6 1998
Greg Stutts Wilmington Regional Office COASTALL"GEMe,er
Central Files
Division of Coastal Management(John Parker & Charles Jones)
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a
State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 980333
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
GENERAL PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Bruce Goepel
Goepel Land and Waterfront Improvements
Carteret County
FOR THE
construction of a driveway, boat ramp and pier in compliance with the provisions of 15A NCAC 2H
.1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management plans
and specifications, and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division
of Water Quality and considered a part of this permit for Goepel Land and Waterfront Improvements.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specific conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit covers the construction of 2,250 square feet of built -upon area for an access drive.
2. The approved Erosion Control plan will be followed.
3. Approved plans and specifications for projects covered by this permit are incorporated by
reference and are enforceable parts of the permit.
4. No stormwater piping in addition to the existing piping shall be allowed except:
a. That minimum amount necessary to direct runoff beneath an impervious surface such as
a road.
b. That minimum amount needed under driveways to provide access to lots.
2

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. S W 8 980333
5. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for revised plans,
specifications, and calculations prior to construction for the following items:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign of, addition to or deletion of the approved amount of built -upon area,
regardless of size.
e. Further subdivision of the project area.
f. Alteration of the proposed drainage.
In addition, the Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a
modification to the permit.
6. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of
the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the
permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet
minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in
writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The permittee shall at all times comply with the following schedule for construction and
maintenance of the project:
2. The permittee shall at all times provide adequate erosion control measures in conformance with
the approved Erosion Control Plan.
The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his representative within
the time frame specified in the written information request.
M. GENERAL CONDITIONS
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
2. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
3. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The filing of a
request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination does not stay any
permit condition.
4. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the
permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit as allowed by the laws,
rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
Subchapter 2H.1000; and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 et. al.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 980333
5: The permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to and approval by the Director.
The Director may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the
name and incorporate such other requirements as maybe necessary. A formal permit request
must be submitted to the Division of Water Quality accompanied by the appropriate fee,
documentation from both parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits, and may or may not
be approved.
6. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all
statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies
(local, state and federal) which have jurisdiction.
7. The pemrittee grants permission to DENR Staff to enter the property for the purpose of
inspecting the project.
Permit issued this the 2nd day of July, 1998.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
—7_ A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 980333
F1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
1�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCES
April 17,1998
Carteret County
DWQ Project # 980241
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Bruce Goe I
423`Shore ne ve
Cedar Point, NC 28594
Dear Mr. Goepel:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place
fill material in 378 square feet of wetlands and/or waters for the purpose of constructing a boat ramp, _
pier and driveway, as you described in your application dated March 201998. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number
3112. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non -
Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying
404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application -
except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for
this project (now or is the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
I. Stormwater shall be directed to flow away from the driveway and lumamcnds into adjacent
vegetation rather than flow directly into surface waters.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
S' c rely,
ston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
John Parker 980241.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Non -Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

' To: John Dorney
Environmental Sciences Branch
DIVISION
CAMA MALTOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
►; � yy .� . ►n uiiu a � ►
REVIEWER: STEENHUISZHS `//2/4j$
ACTING WQ SUPERVISOR: SHIVER
DATE: April 2, 1998 177-�
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKING
PERMIT YR: 98 PERMIT NO.: 980241 COUNTY: Carteret
PROJECT N . • el/ Lot #1 Plantation Shores S/D
PROJECT TYPE: Boat Ramp Ttier PERMIT TYPE: LAMA
COE #: N/A DOT#: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: March 20, 1998
REG OFFICE: WMO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030501
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Bogue Sound
CLASS: SA, ORW STREAM INDEX #: 20-36- (0.5)
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Open
WL IMPACT: Yes WL TYPE: Salt Marsh
WL REQUESTED: 378 SF WL ACR EST: N/A
WL SCORE: N/A
MITIGATION: N/A MITIGATION TYPE: N/A
MITIGATION SIZE: N/A RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE CONDITIONAL
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: NO
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp, a pier and
gravel driveway.
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #3112 for CAMA Permits
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DWQ, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WATER: N/A WETLAND: N/A
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? N/A
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? N/A
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? N/A

• ' Page Two
980241.apr
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: N/A MARINA SERVICES: N/A
OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A
(ATTACH A MARINA USE ATTAINABILITY EVAL.)
RECOMMEENDED CONDMONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIONS: That the project be done
in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate construction area to exceed
25 NTU. This office would also like to recommend that the client slope the driveway and turn
arounds in such a way that sheetflow from rains would not runoff directly into the waterway and
that the area surrounding the driveways be vegetated to help dissipate any potential sheetflow and
filter the runoff.
cc: Central Files - John Dorney
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM- Charles Pigott
John Parker
vlecelveD
pPR 0 3 1999
GOASTALOMGEMENT

NCDENR
"';YJAMES B. FIYNT:IR:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
TO: Mr. Charles R. Fullwood, Jr., Director
Wildlife Resources Commission
Attn: Habitat Conservation Program
FROM: John R. Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: (7Bruce Goepel
PROJECT LOCATION: Lot #1, on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated boat ramp, pier and driveway, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed and return this form
by April 15,1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
'`�A_ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
memo.
�
Signed Wnl1G» VV23a4s�y (taGtS (caYr)inw;nr
Date q `1 S `-q
RECEIVED
APR 171998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIQH, NC 27611-7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYIAFPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/tO% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

UK
AMA_
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR rf
y` is
r
IZI4!
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. John Sutherland, Chief
Water Planning Section
Division of Water Resources
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
't
c a+�
I �
M4q 25 1998
SUBJECT: . CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: `ti��Ce Goepel
PROJECT LOCATION: Lot #1, on Sunset Dr., in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated ramp, pier and driveway.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 15, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed
project, please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments
with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed ADate LSD 7 f�
P.O. Box 27667, RALEION, NC 27611-7667 /2726 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE[phone] FAXQIO-733-1495
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50X RECYCLED/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

I It
NOWDENR
:9 B. HUNT JR
=RNOR a
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Linda Sewall, Director
Division of Environmental Health
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: (Bruce Goepel
PROJECT LOCATION: Lot #1, on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated wood boat ramp, pier and driveway.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by April 15, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data are requested.
REpLy This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
���� cLU" Date 3
Signe
P.O. BOX 27667, RALEIOHI NC 27611-7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE[phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER. SOq RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ARA
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
ROGER N.SCHECTER
DIRECTOR
4^9- �
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25,
Mr. Joseph H. Henderson,
State Property Office
1998 =e,z.
-;.3
I� IMAR 199g W'
Stag r9
". w
s� /
Director' rr oy
Department of Administration
John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Bra pel
PROJECT LOCATION: Lot #1, on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated boat ramp, pier and driveway.
Plesase indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by April 15, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293 when appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
✓ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
Ied . 1 C Date
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, INC 27611-7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]S
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50 a RECYCLE./10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ALTriz"A
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
ROGER N.
DIRECTOR
Y v..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Larry R. Goode, Phd., P.E.
Highway Administrator
Division of Highways
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
RECEIVED
APR 01 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Bruce Goepel
PROJECT LOCATION: -on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated boat ramp, a pier and driveway.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by April 15, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
Signed
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
project for reasons described in the attached
Date
P.O. Box 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-7687 /2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIOH, NC 27604
PHONE[phone] FAX 919-733-t495
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

r
A14A
NCDENR
k JAMES S. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
1
wAYNE MCDCVITT
SECRETARY
r
ROGER N. SCHECTER
DIRECTOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 18, 1998
MEMORANDUM_: O
MAR 2 0 1998
TO: Mr. William A. McNeil, Director DIVISION OF
Division of Community Assistance OASTAL MA14AGEMENT
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Bruce Goepel
Project Location: Lot #1 in Plantation Shores S/D, on
Sunset Drive, adj. Bogue Sound, Town of
Cedar Point, Carteret County
Proposed Project: to construct an elevated wood boat ramp,
pier and gravel driveway
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 8, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed
project, please contact Charles Pigott at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This a ency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
ched commen .
SIGNED _Q DATE 3 AZE
HESTRON PLAZA II
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
151-13 HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28857
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
R-50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CON SUMER PAPER
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYE

JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
I;
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY, z'
s--
j ROGER N. SCHECTER
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 18, 1998
TO: Mr. Charles Gardner, Director
Division of Land Resources
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
1�MAF. 2 0 1998
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Bruce Goepel
Project Location: Lot #1 in Plantation Shores S/D, on
Sunset Drive, adj. Bogue Sound, Town of
Cedar Point, Carteret County
Proposed Project: to construct an elevated wood boat ramp,
pier and gravel driveway
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form by April 8, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed
project, please contact Charles Pigott at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
XThis agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
SIGNED DATE 3 zS 9a
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA It 1$1-B HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLE0/10%POST-CONSUMER PAPER

_�L°'- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
GOVERNOR MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early
Environmental Review Coordinator
WAYNE MCDEVITTL-c,!;'hw
SECRETARY
yp"j.A�'.• Division of Archives and History
- y�
/)q3
I
���ErvED
JON p 3 1998
COASTALMANAGEMENT
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Bruce VLoel
PROJECT LOCATION: on Sunset Dr. in Plantation Shores, S/D, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct an elevated boat ramp, pier and driveway.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by April 15, 1998. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293 when appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPL#•—X- This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
iA comments. / /
Signed Datety
P.O. BOX 27687• RALEIGH, NC 27611 -7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50q RECYCLED/10%POST-CONSUMER PAPER

n
Form DCM-MP-I
APPLICATION BAN 2 6 1958
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name 1�R\)Ce GO E P C L
Address 4I8 5HoPC— u NE DC<
City CED&k EOl INT State N C
Zip 26-�6 - Day Phone 9 I 1 395 9'91P -
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City
Zip
Fax
b. City, town, community or landmark
14 ' -W
c. Street address or secondary road number
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? '< Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) r 0 G'J t 50 V ti r'
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
> r a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Day Phone
State
c. Project name (if any) P I /kt
NOTE: Peru will be issued in name of kwid er(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County CRRTERtT
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both?
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? PRIVATE
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
51 M('4 A- Merl- RAMP Fog
LIWVND47 A 3 r, PAMP
+ PIER T0 se 1MAP-ILY
Wool) C6Id5T2UCn6N
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 5D X Z©O
f
b. Size of individual lot(s) l5D � 2oot
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-6 FEET
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
5WDV
e. Vegetation on tract Li(vH-T'L4 Wo0bEd)
f. Man-made features now on tract Na ktir
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Coneak the local rand we plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
Ii. How is the tract zoned by local government?
ti, s 10 EiJT7�L (R -'Z.o )
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j•
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? -
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes C No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes )-(--No
Coastal (marsh) _X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Anach documentation, if available)
5Ak►J 6 (Lk55 U P TD K WW.
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
W00 0kJ 5tit7E
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
No pis r_ 4A GE5 kiltav AI
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
CO U 1.1v-Y WA !tT TIte"
CST(? (Fsi
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
W An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
JAN 2 6 1998
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name c toyl) //t A//I
Address ; it>>t,) Dil 1)i7k: ✓PU A/i
Phone / I " - :7 3 5T / t3tl
Name !�" D / 10 Y/ S
Address 0 /l ��l 4/6 S CT
Phone L.CrY W G'AlIALA/ Lc -
Name 27313
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Nome VmowN
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
/ • A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
c tltl
This is the day of, 19 jw.
Print Name �3 o-V C t L j7t1__
Signature -13 tl 1���q
Landowner or AuthoriZM Agent
9*v15a -,� -1 i-18
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of inform rion)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_ Yes No
Revised 03l95
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water e6
'/ / l ti /6
(2) Dimensions of fill area RZ pp I MWA'
-t- /', "X /L' X .L ir MP
(3) Purpose of fill GaNcRc=TE_ FOtL RAHP
�z �2UW W)4-TT_-K * D R % )WAY
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs orother wetlands?
Yes �`\/— No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
c. Will wetlands be cussed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
2UC.t: C Ez
Applicant
Signature T
Date �cs�
2-1 ig JAN 2 6 1998
3-�-gg

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete. all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other `
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
112
n
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCNf-NIP.-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial _Community Private
(2) Number
(3) Length 0 !E 3D"0v6JL;W#VJ
(4) Width ion MA)e.
(5) Finger Piers _Yes _No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6) Platform(s) _Yes _No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines /S t H in,
(9) Width of water body API /C7'
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL $q ee
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length
(2)
(3)
Average
wetlands _
Maximum
wetlands
distance from MHW, NWL or
distance beyond MHW, NWL or
JAN 2 6 1998
e. Mooring buoys
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
f. Mooring structure (boadift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete dercripdon)
Date
2-2`i-98
Revised 03/95

3ZOCE 60LPLL p(-Kr WR5�S D 3-6-96
f

.2i1 50JSHEEI$R 550 5
<2391 505NEEISETE-FASPfi SOUME
e 52.'62 1LUSHEll6 EYEF/SP 55WAPE
\ NNa�OR9� BRlld '40 MSHMSM-E PSSOUASE
^ 42+ 1WPECYL MGE'550UANE
42.'W MRECYCLED W RE 5SWME
. r. uunu.Sw
Wo1.1o$ 4he514nW },i�dk►Xo�ddd
MlW . a MHW
4 �1�d�NGYJ S4Nv llam IVISVOO }ISna2 plo7
----------------
Qqxq
. dWN1J��00rQ �Nd41 H91H '
lnogz Lno9� ' Ino5 1
vlNtgt9cv) l�SdcY�
-Ao GNP ly `1yd14 d-Al
3a IL ib. "2d
' Qssl� noll"za$ X �1�'� dN�I�J

I- Y

.aa<.a.r.
e•atc
n
Z
T
cD
N18°-02-p'w
69<21 �
ee:lrorn Raenry
NCS`-Y
506
jUNCr/0N
nTE 35000 in Eaemr. '.om H., 24
is 1m4c, IM rtmamatl is """.
6 IV-02 .
4C E
- 622.6C
24 -�- 5 S 1 M I LC LAST-
A
r 5156< n
n
�Fmw�aero m
-^r•' a
q 50 I5° 5: x x I x I x 5r 5 T 11 5C I W.
fI I 14 .Is 116.:zz. :zi'
N W24 2*
`J
J 0.tGltpe 0.I
C'2Y5-rAL
5NOle 975.
'
I I I
I
s BIE E '
C'
sn'
I •�
I c
I .�'
I `
. v. •n
in
:N
so
9C CC'
• SBT°-as-35E sn \\
Sunset Dr,
e5°-O
w This �me is In 1. as of proanl
n:s
90 Co
yr CI NBSpOi
i0
S-'
SD
50
So
50
57cI
50
w
5o
so'
seso6E
yr .
'" 75Cc .. rol.-.50a'��3q 44 J w-
6E11^J9-35E;m
s6•-Ce-35'E
_
1
`
i p^•p
i II-rc � C a
..-
'Tie
'
� -
o xecm
;I I 291 +�•�.
C.5
_
AAon
in
No:920—W rVJ f
1 BB'
Ng1a W
-`I
Can, r<en
Ian 1 . 5 N_W •ICI .`�$
of".Aar
29
Po - 1 136 Acrn I �.
9mx20, Rj 62 a I
o J � g es�
eo 0 U
G N 0 so^w is 1 x
1 / 0 \
yo pJ,
V
G0.\Cm r.n.
sa...y ror
This map was drawn from recorded information only, as
i sro,Am above. No field work was performed. PLANTATION SNORTS

6c
8661 6 0 033
-L-Da�Ro5) -9)n-j

R. D. DARDEN, JR.
LAwYER
304 North 35th Street
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
May 12, 1998
Mr. Charles Pigott
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Application Goepel
Dear Charles:
MAY 1 8 1998
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 252-808-2510
RECEIVEC,.
MAY 2,7 1998
GOASTAL MANAGEMEW
I am writing on behalf of Mr. Floyd Heath of Cedar Point, who is the immediately adjacent
riparian property owner on the east side of the proposed pier/ramp project.
The primary concerns of my client are these:
1. That the proposed facility may be used by persons other than Mr. Goepel, and
even potentially by persons other than residents of the Plantation Shores Subdivision as it is
shown in Map Book 3 at Page 117 of the Carteret County Registry.
2. That the access road to the site is so narrow and the site itself are so small as
to make it impossible for persons to use the site without encroaching on the property of the
neighbors in the Plantation Shores Subdivision, either blocking their access to their property
or by using this property to turn vehicles with trailers around.
There are certain matters of fact concerning this application of which I am sure the Division
is aware, but I will review them:
a. The Carteret County zoning ordinances provide that a "private" pier and a
"private" launching ramp are permitted uses in the R-20 zone, which is the zoning applicable
to the property. The ordinances do not provide a definition of the word "private". In the
context of a subdivision with single-family lots and no dedicated common area, such as
Plantation Shores, we would interpret "private" in this context to mean a pier or a boat
launching ramp on a lot, limited to the use of the owner of that lot.

If "private" meant "not commercial" we could then have marinas withoutN& 1 8 1998
limit in subdivisions in the R-20 zoning, which I cannot believe is representative of the
thinking of the County Commissioners when the ordinance was adopted in its present form.
b. The residential lot upon which the applicant proposes to place the launching
ramp and marina is accessible only by a dedicated street running east and west in the
Plantation Shores subdivision. There are no restrictive covenants extant in this subdivision,
but there is a legend on the recorded plat of the subdivision, in Map Book 3 at page 117 with
respect to the street which provides the sole access to the applicant's site, stating "Private
street is for the use of property owners only".
C. This road is 30-feet in width. If the proposed ramp/pier is to be used by
persons other than the applicant, it is questionable that the road could handle the traffic. In
particular the lots on the north side of the road are 50 feet in width and a combination boat
and trailer parked on that side of the road could completely block access to a lot.
d. The parcel upon which the ramp and pier are to be located measures 50 feet
by 200 feet. The combined length of a Chevrolet Suburban towing the smallest of the boats
sold by Jones Brothers, a 17 1/2 foot skiff, equals 40 feet 9 1/2 inches. We doubt that it
would be feasible to turn such a combined vehicle and trailer length around in a 50 foot
width. In the alternative, it would seem to me to be impractical to back a vehicle into the
property from a 30 foot road without encroaching on the property of one or more of the
neighbors.
e. There is no provision for parking that we can see in the application.
In summary, we believe that a permit for this facility, if it is issued at all, should provide
that the utilization of the facility is restricted to the single owner/applicant, and is not
delegable by him to others in the Plantation Shores Subdivision, much less persons in other
subdivisions which are being developed by the applicant.
I would be grateful if I could receive, on behalf of my client, Mr. Heath, copies of agency
comments and copies of any final recommendation with respect to the project.
Thank you very much for your attention and your assistance.
Sincerely urs,
R. D. Darden, Jr.
RDDjr:rsh
xc: Floyd Heath
Katrina Marshall, County Planning Director

o6EP_ N, SetiFQTor, +cq T kA par (Ger
iie7=mr biJ•GF CollSrAl, MHNRcFMP1,1T
:0. k�OY� a76,F7 ?Al . 1�! �• 97& l
IEA
+ _ aa, (qqp
RECEIVED
APR 2 8 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
WE PF'o
51YA, ON/
7114. - /ee-
:ml

xW
WDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.. A
. GOVERNOR
4.
\Kv�.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
Dear Interested Party:
The application for a Coastal Area Management Act by Mr. Bruce Goepel was
received in the office of the Director on March 18. Application processing, which was
initiated by the Division's Morehead City office, continues out of the Raleigh office. This
joint State and Federal agency review will continue for the next several weeks. Final
action by the Division is not likely before mid -May.
The comments you have submitted to the record will be carefully considered and
reviewed as appropriate under the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Very sincerely,
Jo Par er���
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-7607 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FA% 919.733-1495
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER. 50%RECYCLED/1 Oq POST -CONSUMER PAPER

or TI IF NEWS-TIMPS
FOR RENT
DOWN EAST, Tusk, 3 bed-
room, 2 bath mobile home,
fireplace, central heal and air,
sell water, oversized private
lot, $450/ month plus deposit;
no inside pals. 729-1276.
EMERALD ISLE annual. 3
bedroom, house it the point.
$950 per month, Carolina
Homes Realty, 800-550-0592.
EMERALD ISLE, 3 bed-
room, 2 bath, sound view du-
plex. oversized 2 car garage.
Private oceanfront parking.
$850. 354-6792. evenings.
EMERALD ISLE, 3 bed-
room, 2 bath, Archer's Creek,
annual lease. $800. Available
May 1. [phone] days,
[phone]. evenings and
weekends.
EMERALD ISLE, ocean -
side duplex with ocean and
sound views. Furnished 2
bedroom, 2 bath, with garage.
Long term. Cell (919)354-
7-785.
EMERALD ISLE. 3 bed-
room, 2 1/2 bath unfurnished
M...nKn.— a mnnlha nr 1—
Friday. March 20. 1998
FOR RENT
SMALL FURNISHED mo-
bile home. Cable and water
provided. References and
criminal check needed. $300
monthly, no pets. 247-3218
after 6 p.m.
STUDIO apartment. $350.
per month. Includes electric.
Newport. Available 3/13/98.
223-3562.,
T.V.'S AND stereos) Lease
to own. No credit needed.
Electronics Plus, 247-2443.
'There's A CWsy New.
Look /n Town
COUNTRY CLUB
APARTMENTS
Offering 1, 2, & 3
bedroom apartments.
Convenient to school
and shopping
(local -Wal-Mart)
Pool, large playground.
For information call
REAL ESTATE,
Mart,
2 ADJACENT lots in Spoon-
ers Creek. Septic Permits.
Marine slip available. $58,500
each. First Commercial Prop-
erties, Jackie Davidlan (919)
247-2035.
2/3 BEDROOM, waterfront,
ranch style house. $175.000.
For more Information
[phone] or(919)393-
7008.
ADAM'S CREEK, 76 acres,
1200 feet,paved road, beside
new Weyerhauser develop-
r
COURTYARD WEST. New-
port Community, of 2and 3
bedroom ' cohdornini mums.
$69,000 - $19,000. Club
House, swimmlmg pod. Model
open daily 2 -5, 500 Chatham
Street,.. Chalk and Cjlbbs. 726-
3167.
pm
DOWN EAST.3 bedroom, 2
bath, completely, remodeled;
waterview /access. Quiet
neighborhood, 1 plus acre,
bonus room, many extra's
$169,000. C811 after 6 p,mi
Imm+nn: n7ARhi,
REAL E TE
LEGAL NOTICES
PINE KNOLL 0 is, gepnt•
Notice of Filing of
Aplalmadore for 1
vale beach club block, boat
dock, 15V well, bed septic.
P
LAMA Major
.Development Porml1
Cleared reedy build. Cell
The Department of Environment
[phone].
and Natural Resources hereby gives
public notice as required by NCGS
PINE KNOLL Ores, 308
113A-119(b) that application for a de -
velopment permit in an Area of Envl-
Pine Knoll Circle y owner. 3
fonmental Concern as designated un-
bedroom, 2 bat tome with
der the CAMA was received on March
masonry fireplace evillybuilt
6.1998.
oraing to said application,
sunroom overlook beautiful
�epropoahlg to construct
wooded pond. Q 1. eslab-
P
r, and gravel driveway
at Lot 1 In Plantation Shores Subdivl-
fshed nelghborho . Sound
slon, on Sunsel Drive and adjacent to
and beach access. 19)247-
Bogus Sound, In the Town of Cedar
7286.. -
Point. Carteret County.
A. copy of the entire appllcalion
PINE KNOLL Sho s, A2
dcl:dasoRgon Division of
Reefstone, 3 b drUom, bath,
Management, located at 151.8 High.
Overlooking lagoon, ivate
way 24. Heslmn Plasa 11, Morehead
beach access, poolA nis.
City. NC, [phone] during normal
busbieealavre.
$111,900. Call D thy
Comments mailed to Roger N.
Richardson; Centur 21
Scheeler. Director. Division of Coastal
Coastal Properties, 241-
Management, P.O. Bra 27687. Ralegh,.
NO. 27611. prior to April 10. 1998, wire
726-4700.
be considered In making the permit de-
cislon. Later conmiems nil be accepted
RESIDENTIAL LOT on
end consmsred up to Me time of permil
Hafkere Island,.161'% j'
decision. Project mod;ficalim may oc.
cur based on review and comment by
paved road, 2 lots from r,
the public and stets and loderal agen-
septic tank and eleva n
sea. Nonce a me permit dwsle' in this
mark -on site:. Call 728.4 Q
matter will ba provided upon wrlllen re -
west. M20
after 6:00 p.m...
- I
SOMERSET PLAN'1
TION. Second row lot in
LEGA
Prime
The Cad,
ens will be
mu Elan
90.
All aside
I
Island Ic
C ty Board
nut r 'slered
has
nl 10.
Fl ileclier
movE since I
N I Board
C.
street.
theffnes of 8
lI gh Fri
for tie revv
. You n
I
y vole
coon he alit
for v, gone
line to go
sickn or pl
by ab b
for or bsenl
oi,g ch 1t
lee v g will
in t told
daa a for i
be by mat
gt ions ab,
I g, poll
r or
re
by to

II GGF2 1 , SetfEcTor,
IR FCTO(_, 1) N • OF C0719rP.1, MANtICFPIFA%T-
Il�0, Son a76F7, ?A k. /J.e, 97&11
_ RTTAc N E� -- k1=(j R I- )JbT i
- - --RECEIVED
-- APR_2-8.1998----- -- -
- - -- - -- - COASTAL-MANAGEMENT—

I
I
I
•
I
1
I
,
i
Iy
,
I
I
I
I
I
••+
�
i
1
I ,
n 1 1•
1
i
it
1+.'�
I
� I
,1.
I
I
I
4
1
t,v
1
I
y
I•
t.
oil
I
I
I I
I 1 I
• � 1

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
"`? ...
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
II�s
w
N '
JAME9 B.
. HUNT JR.���,
March 25 1998
e
.: GOVERNOR l<fi!f
Dear Interested Party:
The application for a Coastal Area Management Act by Mr. Bruce Goepe was
V ,ROGER N. SCRECTER:3
T DIRECTOR - -.
received in the office of the Director on March 18. Application processing, which was
ysY, ,�
iz
initiated by the Division's Morehead City office, continues out of the Raleigh office. This
�, �... =�
joint State and Federal agency review will continue for the next several weeks. Final
,;�,.,�,w;��•�r�;�;
action by the Division is not likely before mid -May.
W!-
v, ==
-
Y
�•i
The comments you have submitted to the record will be carefully considered and
reviewed as appropriate under the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Very sincerely,
Jo Pazkei'���
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611.7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AM Pniu OPPORTUNITY/APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER-SO%RECYCLED/IOq P05T-CONSUMER PAPER

Be THE NEWS -TIMES . Frlday. March 20.1998
FOR• RENT FOR RENT
DOWN EAST,.Tusk, 3 bed-
SMALL FURNISHED
mo-
room, 2 bath mobile home,
bile home. Cable
and water
fireplace, central heat and air,
soft water, oversized)
provided. References and
private
lot, $450/ month plus deposit;
criminal check needed. $300
monthly, no pets. 247-3218
no inside pets. 729.1276,
after 6 p.m.
EMERALD ISLE annual. 3
bedroom, house at the point.
STUDIO apartment. $350,
$950 per month; Carolina
per month. Includes electric.
Homes Realty, 800-550-0592.
Newport. Available 3113/98.
EMERALD ISLE, 3 bed-
223.3562. .
room, 2 bath, sound view du-
plex, oversized 2 car garage.
T.V.'S AND stereosl Lease
Private oceanfront parking.
to own. No'credit.needed.
$850.354-6792, evenings.
Electronics Plus, 247-2443.
.
EMERALD ISLE, 3 bed-
room, 2 bath, Archer's Creek,
annual lease. $800. Available
May 1.[phone] days,
[phone], evenings and
weekends.'
EMERALD ISLE, Ocean-
side duplex with ocean and
sound views.. Furnished 2 .
bedroom, 2 bath, with garage. '
Long term. Call (919)354-
7785.
EMERALD ISLE. 3 bed-
room, 2 1%2 bath unfurnished
4.aveAn,mn Cmi, l --
There'sA Classy New.
Look In Town
COUNTRY CLUB
APARTMENTS -
Offering I' 2' * 3
bedroom apartments.'
Cortvenient to school
and shopping
(local -Wal-Mart)
Pool, latge playground.'
For. information call'
1264389- . am
PINE KNOLL
.vale beach club
dock, 150' well,
cleared, ready
[phone].
Pine Knoll Circle
bedroom, 2 bat
masonry fireplace
sunroom overlook
wooded -pond: O
Iished neighborho
and beach access.
7285.
• -i
(ores, pri-
Notice ofFiling of -
block, boat
Appgeag°n for
bed septic,
P
CAN Moor '
. Development Permit
build. (Mall
The Department of Environment
-^
and Natural Resources hereby gives
public nonce as required by NCOS'
113AA 19(b)that application for a de.
ores, 308
velopment permit In an Area of Envi.
'Jr owner. 3
ronmental Concern as designated un,
10me with
der the CAMA was received on March
ewly built
6, 1998.
aAccoiding to said application,
beautiful
Bruce Goepel is proposing to construct
t:estab-
a boat ramp,'pfer, and gravel driveway
at Lot t In Plantation Shores Subdiv)-
. Sound
sion, on Sunset Drive and adjacent to
19)247-,.
Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar
Pdnq Carteret County. • -
A.copy, of the entire application
may be emmined or cooled at the oKca
'.'; .,
PINE KNOLL. Sho s,
#2
2 ADJACENT lots in Spoon-
COURTYAFID�WEST.'New-
Reefstone; 3 bedroom, bath;
overlooking lagoon, ,bate
.erg Creek. Septic Permits.
port Community of 2`and'3
beach access, pool/t
file.Marina
slip available.-$58,500
be&66M `dcfiha inirliinums.
$111,900. all,
thy
each. First Commercial. Prop- .
$69,000 w $79;060:' Club
Richardson;' beatur
21
'D erties, Jackieavidiali (919)
House, swimmimg pool. Model
Coastal. Properties, 241-
0;
247-2035.
open daily 2 -5. 500 Chatham
726-4706..' . ..
2/3 BEDROOM, waterfront,
Street„Chalk and Gibbs. 726-
3167.,
'
RESIDENTIAL LOT
on
ranch style house. $175,000.
,,
Hackers' Island,:161'z
T,
For : more .. information
DOWN EAST. *3 bddrpoir6; 2
paved road; 2 lots from
r,
[phone] or-(919)393=
bath, compleiely,rem6l:106
-septic-t6nik and eleva
n
?�8•
waterview /access. Quiet
mark-onsite:. Gail 728.4
4.
ADAM'S CREEK,76 acres,
neighborhood, 1 plus acre,,
after6i00p.m.`" -
1200-feet. aved road;�besida
P
bonus room;; many,,extra's
$169,000. C611 after :6.
SOMERSET PLAN'
new Weyerhauser develop-
p.mi
.z�e.,h;, ;;,;m,' _
TION. Second row. lot ,in
ex.
Dily,.NC, [phone] during normal
business hours
Comments mallad to Roger' N.
Sphecter, Director, Division of Coastal
Management, P.O. Boy Z7687, Raleigh,.
NC, 27611. prior to April 10, 1998, will
be considered In making the permit de:
cisfon Later comments wm be accepted
and considered up to the time of permit
decision: Project madtication may,00!
our based on review and. comment by
the public and stale and federal agen-
cies. Notice of the Permit decision In this,
matter will be provided upon written rep
quest.' r. 1 M20
LEG
Pdr
The C:
ions will b
rimary El
98. .
NI rest
r islered
C ty Bo:
IN leclio,
rep red d
this Clio,
not r ishm
late el 1(
IA Ih led
cow sine
ty 1 Boar
Cc
Sire
urs d
h gh I
for am
co . You
U. or irdc
y vc
Men.
lot v g or
una to f
sicka or
by ab lee
for a bse
ring ch
lee v g n
m ) oar
Jae a [o]
as by m

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
Dear Interested Party:
The application for a Coastal Area Management Act by Mr. Bruce Goepel was
received in the office of the Director on March 18. Application processing, which was
initiated by the Division's Morehead City office, continues out of the Raleigh office. This
joint State and Federal agency review will continue for the next several weeks. Final
action by the Division is not likely before mid -May.
The comments you have submitted to the record will be carefully considered and
reviewed as appropriate under the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Very sincerely,
J4
o
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. BOX 27587, RALEIGH, NC 27611.7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]S
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

JAMEB B. HUNTJR{«w.j
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
Dear Interested Parry:
The application for a Coastal Area Management Act by Mr. Bruce Goepel was
received in the office of the Director on March 18. Application processing, which was
initiated by the Division's Morehead City office, continues out of the Raleigh office. This
joint State and Federal agency review will continue for the next several weeks. Final
action by the Division is not likely before mid -May.
The comments you have submitted to the record will be carefully considered and
reviewed as appropriate under the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
JRP-jr/aw
Very sincerely,
Jo Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611.7687 /272B CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHoNE[phone] FAX [phone]S
Mn?1. RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 25, 1998
Dear Interested Party:
The application for a Coastal Area Management Act by Mr. Bruce Goepel was
received in the office of the Director on March 18. Application processing, which was
initiated by the Division's Morehead City office, continues out of the Raleigh office. This
joint State and Federal agency review will continue for the next several weeks. Final
action by the Division is not likely before mid -May.
The comments you have submitted to the record will be carefully considered and
reviewed as appropriate under the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Very sincerely,
J4o ark . Per, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-7687 /2728 CAPITAL SLVD.. RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
... v..uu r�nenwrv.,, I ArrIw MATNE ACT1.. EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/1 O a POST -CONSUMER PAPER

S
m

I I 1 -1 1 1 -1- 1 � I --I -J
I , I
I

!ilvJL& e /iiel:
CoASTAC MANA�3zlENT
c , V `, •�""''yyl / (n[I'i'�C{ O ,
/
/ M
17
Ii 5 4*4 P
fqn (f ,4-6 O-A� /1 j?iL-enL)/u-L-
f�'i C'j`7-mob �("Zl}'�-�'•t-k �ll..Z. �-e.cC� c.�d-xt �;�.yu.{=�.(

77
4v %4
L'7tn1/�1 742.)
Vk.
Al
Ale—
/ l 4 C'
fi 7 p /Jn W9( P
£!/'+'7�1
[
�-L •�.., iJ'����li. CCU .��c�f,✓ �1-�� � j � �d?u cc.ik.�c.�� ,
/ (� i�ti.e_ 7`G�----� �•(JL�-�.. c7Le c�2.t-> �ti-;71u.
lc� `mil Zpk - �VL '7
ti lU d2je- C,4y� ,C? c, i� �

L

Form DCM-MP-I
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
I. APPLICANT c r-_ r n P rr„ F r! -r -
a. Landowner:
Name RUCL GnFPEt_
Address Lt I q 5 FfopC/J ! J - J)�J
City � /1 P. f 2112'r- State i1(7,
Zip 2�is84 Day Phone `l 1 1 ?,C75 ri }il r
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name /. r-t q-
Address
City
Zip Day Phone
Fax
State
c. Project name (if any) /`1 A
N07E: Perrrdr will be issued in Mme of laidowner(s), and/or
projecr Mm .
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County O i llf - 1 T
c. Street address or secondary road number
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? < yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) D
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both?
C. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? P( IVP• r'/>:
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
51fir( r 514411. nr/iP I"r(z
Lrv(Jr..11lrrl, �'i%�'r'r /'nr1�
r PrEF� 'Io EC i'rt r�rIw
1•rnUrJ ���r� n>rrr7r/>rd
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-I
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract J F)e X z n^
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-/ FtF-r
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
jAlip
e. Vegetation on tract 1-1 (-0 11 L'I "I ^nD'.:l>
f. Man-made features now on tract Nn1 1
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land we plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local governm)ent?
�iL'slpEtmh1, (R Zo
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach toning compliance certificate, lfapplicable)
j•
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom?
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes Z_No
Coastal (marsh) _X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
5Au60R55 UPI,) 11-10d.
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
MOVE 0eJ Sl'I-C"
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
No Pi C../l/d/,•/ //t rout//
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
C t)_)L)ry WI--I-r-.n A,.r- 'i ltin
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy or the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an g 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 71.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (CAtact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
site. include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name f l ovo //t /1//l
Address ii1)0"t,l pi!
Phone Jul - qI Oil
Name / %3pYL
Address o l l�/N6 CT
Phone C t�4 S >2nL—" dlc
Name 2- 7313
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
NoNt;7 V.m
•' A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and irdet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - I to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of , I9 I -
Print Name �5 j�V C L
Signature 1_'2
Landowner or Awhorizk Agmt
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial _Community -Z Private
(2) Number 1
(3) Length %0 A PP 35 ' I N 111 wnit:p )
(4) Width R' OAK.
(5) Finger Piers _ Yes _ No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6) Platform(s) —Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines /S t 1101.
(9) Width of water body Apr 120
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL Z 2 "
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
C. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
e. Mooring buoys
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
ki 1(t C C (5 (_IA
Applicant or -Pro e—d)Name
Signature
rate
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL .
J. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
Type of bulkhead or riprap material
Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
1. Type of fill material
Source of fill material
I. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
i. Will fill material be brought to site?
_-X— Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water / '/X /Z / 'V N
(2) Dimensions of fill area
X /Z/X
(3) Purpose of fill GpPi tt -JU Fog 2>a-Hp
1.30-1)w f FYT-r K
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes � No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
C047t it '4'?V11' 7e) A//)
//0 5-ml7 A rin �i
C. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
1500ct=
Applicant o N
Signature
(-23 ej
VI T
tevaed 03/95

Form DCM-W-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabiliwiun)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth nenth
50
12
3
DD
PY� ai6e i ''i
MOM,
aii%dC
�I
f yZ
k
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

� ;. SUNSET D[ZIVE
I
N
O
v vi;

February 18, 1998
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27697
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Bruce Goepel CALv1A Permit Application
Dear Mr. Schecter.
RECEIVED
MAR -;9 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
This letter is from every property owner who lives adjacent to the above referenced project,
including the two adjacent riparian property owners, Floyd Heath and Linda Baynes.
We object to this project for the following reasons:
(1) The permit application is incomplete. The proposed development is on Outstanding.
Resource Waters of Bogue Sound. The permit application provides no information on the
development that is proposed above mean high water. Given the narrow nature of the lot
(50 feet), we do not believe that the applicant can comply with the 25% impervious cover
that applies within 575 feet of mean high water.
(2) There is no buffer zone of at least 30 feet above mean high water for this development.
All development in the estuarine shoreline Area of Environmental Concern next to
Outstanding Resource Waters must provide for this buffer, including boat ramps.
(3) Water quality at the site will be damaged by the project The depth of water at the end of
the.pier is only 22 inches. The depth at the end of the ramp will be less. Boats using this
ramp will kick up the muddy bottom, causing water quality to be materially degraded so
as to hurt the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of these
Outstanding Resource Waters.. For this reason, this project will result in degradation
of water quality, violating water quality standards including the state's "antidegradation"
standards.
(4) This project is part of a larger development project that has not been properly regulated
At least eight lots are being developed within the 575 foot Area of Environmental
Concern that is adjacent to this Outstanding Resource Waters. The water quality impacts
of this development should be evaluated as one project, not in a piecemeal fashion.

Comments on Bruce Goepel Permit Application
Page 2,. February 18, 1998 .
For these reasons, we ask that this permit application be denied. If you continue to consider this
request, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:
(1) How will the use of this boat ramp be regulated so that it is maintained as a private
facility?
(2) Who will have permission to use this ramp?
(3) How will the owner prevent other people from using this ramp?
(4) Will the ability to use this ramp be sold to any other people as part of property
transactions?. If so, why is this not a "commercial" facility?
.(5) Where will cars and boattrailers be parked that use. this facility?
Thank you for answering,these questions. Please let us know immediately of any actions you
take in response to this permit application, including any requests for additional information. As.
adj acent riparian property owners, we request to be notified by certified letters of 'any changes in
the permit application or permit decisions.
cc: Charles Jones, Division of Coastal.Management
Division of.Marine Fisheries
Division of Water Quality
Secretary Wayne McDevitt, Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources.
Governor James B. Hunt

G
Wco
01
m
LU LU
w
LUoa.
February 18, 1998
.
Roger Schecter, Director.
a
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Brace Goepel CAMA Permit Application
Dear Mr. Schecter:
This letter is from every property owner who lives adjacent to the above referenced project,
including the two adjacent riparian property owners, Floyd Heath and Linda Baynes.
We object to this project for the following reasons:
(1) The permit application is incomplete. The proposed development is on Outstanding
Resource Waters of Bogue Sound. The permit application.provides no information on the
development that is proposed above mean high water. Given the narrow nature of the lot
.(50 feet), we do not believe that the applicant can comply with the 25% impervious cover
that applies within 575 feet of mean high water.
(2) There is no buffer zone of at least 30 feet above mean high water for this development.
All development in the estuarine shoreline Area of Environmental Concern next to
Outstanding Resource Waters must provide for this buffer, including boat ramps.
(3) Water quality at the site will be damaged.by the project The depth of water at the end of
the pier is only 22 inches. The depth at the end of the ramp will be less. Boats using this
ramp will kick up the muddy bottom, causing water quality to be materially degraded so
as to hurt the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of these
Outstanding Resource Waters. For this reason, this project will result in degradation
of water quality, violating water quality standards including the.state's "antidegradation"
standards.
(4) This project is part of a larger development project that has not been properly regulated.
At least eight lots are being developed within the 575 foot Area of Environmental
Concern that is adjacent to this Outstanding Resource Waters. The water quality impacts
of this development should be evaluated as one project, not in a piecemeal fashion.

Comments on Bruce Goepel Permit Application
Page 2,. February 18, 1998 .
For these reasons, we ask that this permit application be denied. If you continue to consider this
request, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:
(1) How will the use of this boat ramp be regulated so that it is maintained as a private
facility?
(2) Who will have permission to use this ramp?
(3) How will the owner prevent other people from using this ramp?
(4) Will the ability to use this ramp be sold to any other people as part of property
transactions?. If so, why is this not a "commercial' facility?
-
(5) Where will cars and boattraiiers be parked that use this facility?
Thank you for answering,these questions. Please let us know immediately of any actions you
take in response to this permit application, including any requests for additional information. As
adjacent riparian property owners, we request to be notified by certified letters of any changes in
the permit application or permit decisions.
With best regards,
cc: Charles Jones, Division of Coastal.Management
Division of Marine Fisheries
Division of Water Quality
Secretary Wayne McDevitt, Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources.
Governor James B. Hunt

March 3, 1998
Mr. Roger Schecter, Director
N. C. Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application of Bruce Goepel dated 1-23-98
Location: Cedar Point, Carteret County
RECEIVED
MAR - 4 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
I am aware that an application as described above has been made to the Division of Coastal Management
for a permit to construct a launching ramp and a pier for community use on a residential lot 50 feet in width
from a private home. The applicant refers to this as a "private" facility, but it is our understanding that it is
for community use by purchasers of lots from the applicant which do not have water frontage.
There is existing spartina and juncos grass on this site which would have to be removed by the
construction.
This area is currently open for shellfishing and the water classification is SA It would seem probable that
shellfishing in the area would be disturbed by this activity.
In addition, the body of water into which this ramp and pier would enter is a narrow and shallow area
separated from the main open water of the Intracoastal Waterway by a fringe of marsh. It would seem
evident that the action of boat propellers in this very shallow body of water, coupled with the wakes which
would be generated by boat traffic into and away from the launching area, would create problems with silt.
The zoning in the area is R-20, which is limited to single family residential use with a minimum lot size of
approximately one-half acre. The location upon which the ramp and pier is proposed to be built is accessed
by a private road which is only 30 feet in width, and this road in turn is accessed by another private
easement which is 20 feet in width. It would not be feasible for cars and boat trailers to be parked in the
area without obstructing the access of other property owners for ingress and regress to and from their
property.
Please add this correspondence to the file of those opposing the issuance of a permit. It would also be
appreciated if I would be informed of any correspondence, hearings, or any activity associated with the
application process.
Thank you.
Sincerer
Thomas West
127 Sunset Drive
Cedar Point, NC 29594

February 16, 1998
Mr. Roger Schecter, Director
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application of Bruce Goepeldated 1-23-98
Location: Cedar Point, Carteret County
Dear Mr. Schecter:
RrZCEIVE®
MAR,- 41998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
I am aware that an application as described above has been made to the Division of Coastal
Management for a permit to construct a launching ramp and a pier, for community use, on a
residential lot 50 feet in width immediately adjacent to my home. _ The applicant refers to
this as a "private" facility, but it is our understanding that it is for community use by
purchasers of lots from the applicant which do not have water frontage.
There is existing extensive spartina and juncus grass on this site, which would have to be
removed by the construction.
This area is currently open for shellfishing and the water classification is SA. It would seem
probable that shellfishing in the area would be disturbed by this activity.
In addition, the body of water into which this ramp and pier would enter is a narrow and
shallow area separated from the main open water of the Intracoastal Waterway by a fringe of
marsh. It would seem evident that the action of boat propellers in this very shallow body of
water, coupled with the wakes which would be generated by boat traffic into and away from
the launching area, would create problems with silt.
The zoning in the area is R-20, which is limited to single family residential use with a
minimum lot size of approximately one-half acre. The location upon which the ramp and
pier is proposed to be built is accessed by a private road which is only 30 feet in width, and
this road in turn is accessed by another private easement which is 20 feet in width. It would
not be feasible for cars and boat trailers to be parked in the area without obstructing the
access of other.property owners for ingress and regress to and from their properties.
I would be grateful if you could see that this letter, opposing the issuance of a permit in
response to this application, be placed in the file and that my name and mailing address be
made of record in the offices of the Division of Coastal Management such that I might be
informed of any correspondence, hearings, or any other activity associated with the
application process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Floyd Heath V
cc: Charles Jones

February 18, 1998
The Division of Coastal Management
Re: Application for dock and seawall at Plantation Shores
Subdivision — 9 � 1,6 'r G/ D E p E L
Dear Sir,
I have several concerns regarding the above application.
1.) This is not for personal use but will be for land
development purposes for a number of lots close to the property.
2.) There will not be sufficient area to moor boats which use
this boat ramp.
3.) The time of use for this dock and boat ramp has not been
addressed and I fear late and early use will disturb the neighbors.
4.) I fear there will be trash generated which could likely
end up on my lot.
5.) The application states there is 22 (twenty-two) inches of
water. This is not true as the entrance to this bay runs about 10
(ten) inches MLW and the boats will have trouble getting in and
out.
6.) The constant use of this bay for boat traffic will create
wash and possible damage to current property owners boats already
in place.
The Depth, width and proximity to protected marsh grasses does not
encourage heavy boat traffic in this area and this dock and boat
ramp would vastly increase the usage.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. I remain
Sincerely yours,
Floyd Heath
Sunset Drive
Cedar Point, NC
RECEIVE®
MAR,. - 4 1998
COASTAL MMAGEMENT

R. N. Doster
607 Webster St
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9278
February 26, 1998
N. C. Division Coastal Management
Mr. Roger Schector, Director
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RECEIVED
MR..- 5:'1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT. il CuPa MIT APPLICATION
submitted by Bruce Goepel to -
build i
LOCATION: Carteret County;
Lo
t
Township; Plantation
ShoresEstates;
Gentlemen:
Mr. Floyd Heath , a property owner in Plantation Shores.informed
me that he received a registered letter from Mr. Goepel advising
that he plans to build/erect a BOAT RAMP and PIER for personal
residenceuse. Since I own a seventy-five
the proposed projectI hereby registermy objection feet from
Currently when I launch my boat I take it to the Public Wildlife
ramp located a short distance from me on NC Hwy-24 in Cedar .
Point, or I take it to a local marina. There are several boat
ramps in the area.
ocated
sightoandlhas accessttofaont pierewhichcisladjac adjacent y eye
owns a his
residence. A boat lift rather than a boat ramp would be more
friendly toward coastal habitats and the estuarine endangered
the News and Observer dated Feb 26,
species. (An article from
1998 is enclosed.)
Personally I think Mr. Goepel is building this boat ramp as a
commercial incentive for his development rather than for personal
use. Thank you for your time and consideration to the above
objection. Please feel free to contact me of additional
information is desired.
Sin erly,
R. N. Doster

or - f.
`u
Soa--t!01--
ITOMPOAS, THAT)
'Yeiaou .0 .A
is TSKAW Ma
apse-raa-eIe
2QQI , JS y7a[rmm
Ja9m9Gl,ifv 1.liJdZ*7 11040i G .J .K
-[OJDSUM .110,002:8 IOPOA .714
723CS _ Da .G .q
, ron Du ,o lerng
n7 incJ.� .3}U'_r$ Yd b9JJ C,ltdua HGITAQi,iyqA TTHARq RMAD :T aLlUa
. iglq bw gmLa WON 6 Mad
A ,
: U4dpI91JUSD
beml Olr[.L Palo" pJi:IFAflq !ri aenwo yjango1a
nnS2.rvb; f9 son `rj9H ')\`Q.C'� . ";1•I
4 7}4 m02J `�3JJ91 b071910 f 0! o bs`; .,'opg} Url 1 fr1J 9111
1SE0aaM Us! RHIg bnA gHAR TA.GU 5 J7.979\''•pp& 0, agolq GJ JQ
moll Jee9 {aC) evil-y awwea yino eangbi t;; 4 n:';, s
01
.CCOfjp9-do ym oiaip9_[ yda;a , I svog2 _m
..rt ' �sCo7g L9.o�ao-rq 9rtJ
slilbLiW of ldNq qAj of Ji 910j I iaod y rt rCon!.)s1 "i n3,l:a y Lt;le.rul')
isbs:) fIi AS YWH Gvt r[o err: moll """h : Wnl s bstno& gma7
sod "Usvoa SM O:OAT .svianx lu7ol u aJ Ji e_f,.1 T ;s ,Jniog
ae7`. 9rl:1 rfi 1Clf( —f
SY9 YM aMiw bWA001 swgebla-_`7 JaoAllEia"vl1�CjyU:J rAt
- 211 O; JaeostbL- Q ribirlw a± a 07 alonns a6d has JnQ slam ad b1now gm57 izad f ner17 7S,'IJa': J3.i f J 0d A .ponebi &i b_1 nparhah ar I r uJ'aq pal JqJ BJFJ.idba i6Ja5u, Wawa 1bnatul , `S id93 badsb lovasndc bas aWOR s ;J moll eInAls rrii }'avio0ga
5 of flr 61 KOd Qr3 gnibIjUd al leagoD .UM An:.f{S I V11fnOaa0q
1Snonvoq ::o1 r[ardJ :gdj,;C Jn9Q1S+01.09b a.C'.!i '1Ol 9V.f :1'!C9^rI.0 liil':J IenClifi};)
y VOQ`6 o[{i 01 nOi:+E"ian00 bof ea":[UOY 101 UOY AWT .Seu
KnoVibbB Ao am 1o6inoo o;t soua .Casa Sas9 r q . nc,,: ine�c o
. bs7ia9b at rao.cJsm7c3r[i
�sJaoQ .*.•F ,SS
Soa--t!01--
ITOMPOAS, THAT)
'Yeiaou .0 .A
is TSKAW Ma
apse-raa-eIe
2QQI , JS y7a[rmm
Ja9m9Gl,ifv 1.liJdZ*7 11040i G .J .K
-[OJDSUM .110,002:8 IOPOA .714
723CS _ Da .G .q
, ron Du ,o lerng
n7 incJ.� .3}U'_r$ Yd b9JJ C,ltdua HGITAQi,iyqA TTHARq RMAD :T aLlUa
. iglq bw gmLa WON 6 Mad
A ,
: U4dpI91JUSD
beml Olr[.L Palo" pJi:IFAflq !ri aenwo yjango1a
nnS2.rvb; f9 son `rj9H ')\`Q.C'� . ";1•I
4 7}4 m02J `�3JJ91 b071910 f 0! o bs`; .,'opg} Url 1 fr1J 9111
1SE0aaM Us! RHIg bnA gHAR TA.GU 5 J7.979\''•pp& 0, agolq GJ JQ
moll Jee9 {aC) evil-y awwea yino eangbi t;; 4 n:';, s
01
.CCOfjp9-do ym oiaip9_[ yda;a , I svog2 _m
..rt ' �sCo7g L9.o�ao-rq 9rtJ
slilbLiW of ldNq qAj of Ji 910j I iaod y rt rCon!.)s1 "i n3,l:a y Lt;le.rul')
isbs:) fIi AS YWH Gvt r[o err: moll """h : Wnl s bstno& gma7
sod "Usvoa SM O:OAT .svianx lu7ol u aJ Ji e_f,.1 T ;s ,Jniog
ae7`. 9rl:1 rfi 1Clf( —f
SY9 YM aMiw bWA001 swgebla-_`7 JaoAllEia"vl1�CjyU:J rAt
- 211 O; JaeostbL- Q ribirlw a± a 07 alonns a6d has JnQ slam ad b1now gm57 izad f ner17 7S,'IJa': J3.i f J 0d A .ponebi &i b_1 nparhah ar I r uJ'aq pal JqJ BJFJ.idba i6Ja5u, Wawa 1bnatul , `S id93 badsb lovasndc bas aWOR s ;J moll eInAls rrii }'avio0ga
5 of flr 61 KOd Qr3 gnibIjUd al leagoD .UM An:.f{S I V11fnOaa0q
1Snonvoq ::o1 r[ardJ :gdj,;C Jn9Q1S+01.09b a.C'.!i '1Ol 9V.f :1'!C9^rI.0 liil':J IenClifi};)
y VOQ`6 o[{i 01 nOi:+E"ian00 bof ea":[UOY 101 UOY AWT .Seu
KnoVibbB Ao am 1o6inoo o;t soua .Casa Sas9 r q . nc,,: ine�c o
. bs7ia9b at rao.cJsm7c3r[i
�sJaoQ .*.•F ,SS

Y
FEB 1 9 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
MOREHEA
�i r/i gi m �, COQ.S7/-rr !%16iM-liGi� mP�i_f
�rn � ?ie ao,;-ss7
g-:
I" D 1 __ I i

- I
-,.A

February 16, 1998
Mr. Roger Schecter, Director
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application of Bruce Goepel dated 1-23-98
Location: Cedar Point, Carteret County
Dear Mr. Schecter:
FEB 2 3 7998
I am aware that an application as described above has been made to the Division of Coastal
Management for a permit to construct a launching ramp and a pier, for community use, on a
residential lot 50 feet in width immediately adjacent to my home. The applicant refers to
this as a "private" facility, but it is our understanding that it is for community use by
purchasers of lots from the applicant which do not have water frontage.
There is existing extensive spartina and juncus grass on this site, which would have to be
removed by the construction.
This area is currently open for shellfishing and the water classification is SA. It would seem
probable that shellfishing in the area would be disturbed by this activity.
In addition, the body of water into which this ramp and pier would enter is a narrow and
shallow area separated from the main open water of the Intracoastal Waterway by a fringe of
marsh. It would seem evident that the action of boat propellers in this very shallow body of
water, coupled with the wakes which would be generated by boat traffic into and away from
the launching area, would create problems with silt.
The zoning in the area is R-20, which is limited to single family residential use with a
minimum lot size of approximately one-half acre. The location upon which the ramp and
pier is proposed to be built is accessed by a private road which is only 30 feet in width, and
this road in turn is accessed by another private easement which is 20 feet in width. It would
not be feasible for cars and boat trailers to be parked in the area without obstructing the
access of other property owners for ingress and regress to and from their properties.
I would be grateful if you could see that this letter, opposing the issuance of a permit in
response to this application, be placed in the file and that my name and mailing address be
made of record in the offices of the Division of Coastal Management such that I might be
informed of any correspondence, hearings, or any other activity associated with the
application process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Floy Heath
cc: Charles Jones

February 16, 1998
Mr. Roger Schecter, Director
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application of Bruce Goepel dated 1-23-98
Location: Cedar Point, Carteret County
Dear Mr. Schecter:
cGASrA( MA1VAG"4eIV7
I am aware that an application as described above has been made to the Division of Coastal
Management for a permit to construct a launching ramp and a pier, for community use, on a
residential lot 50 feet in width immediately adjacent to my home. The applicant refers to
this as a "private" facility, but it is our understanding that it is for community use by
purchasers of lots from the applicant which do not have water frontage.
There is existing extensive spartina and juncus grass on this site, which would have to be
removed by the construction.
This area is currently open for shellfishing and the water classification is SA. It would seem
probable that shellfishing in the area would be disturbed by this activity.
In addition, the body of water into which this ramp and pier would enter is a narrow and
shallow area separated from the main open water of the Intracoastal Waterway by a fringe of
marsh. It would seem evident that the action of boat propellers in this very shallow body of
water, coupled with the wakes which would be generated by boat traffic into and away from
the launching area, would create problems with silt.
The zoning in the area is R-20, which is limited to single family residential use with a
minimum lot size of approximately one-half acre. The location upon which the ramp and
pier is proposed to be built is accessed by a private road which is only 30 feet in width, and
this road in turn is accessed by another private easement which is 20 feet in width. It would
not be feasible for cars and boat trailers to be parked in the area without obstructing the
access of other property owners for ingress and regress to and from their properties.
I would be grateful if you could see that this letter, opposing the issuance of a permit in
response to this application, be placed in the file and that my name and mailing address be
made of record in the offices of the Division of Coastal Management such that I might be
informed of any correspondence, hearings, or any other activity associated with the
application process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
�a�
Flo Hea%
c\ Charles Jones

February 18, 1998
The Division of Coastal Management
Re: Application for dock and seawall at Plantation Shores
Subdivision o 84 L .c -r-_ 6.0'g PG L
Dear Sir,
I have several concerns regarding the above application.
1.) This is not for personal use but will be for land
development purposes for a number of lots close to the property.
2.) There will not be sufficient area to moor boats which use
this boat ramp.
3.) The time of use for this dock and boat ramp has not been
addressed and I fear late and early use will disturb the neighbors.
1
4'.) I fear there will be trash generated which could likely
end up on my lQt.
5.) The application states there is 22 (twenty-two) inches of
water. This is not true as the entrance to this bay runs about 10
(ten) inches MLW and the boats will have trouble getting in and
out.
6.) The constant use of this bay for boat traffic will create
wash and possible damage to current property owners boats already
in place.
The Depth, width and proximity to protected marsh grasses does not
encourage heavy boat traffic in this area and this dock and boat
ramp would vastly increase the usage.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. I remain
Sincerely yours,
g i
Floyd Heath
Sunset Drive
Cedar Point, NC
J

February 18, 1998 ra,�CSINJSI
Roger Schecter, Director MAR _ G Jy7 i
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687 WAGEMENI
Raleigh, NC 27611 COASTA�M
RE: Bruce Goepel CAMA Permit Application
Dear Mr. Schecter:
This letter is from every property owner who lives adjacent to the above referenced project,
including the two adjacent riparian property owners, Floyd Heath and Linda Baynes.
We object to this project for the following reasons:
(1) The permit application is incomplete. The proposed development is on Outstanding
Resource Waters of Bogue Sound. The permit application provides no information on the
development that is proposed above mean high water. Given the narrow nature of the lot
(50 feet), we do not believe that the applicant can comply with the 25% impervious cover
that applies within 575 feet of mean high water.
(2) There is no buffer zone of at least 30 feet above mean high water for this development.
All development in the estuarine shoreline Area of Environmental Concern next to
Outstanding Resource Waters must provide for this buffer, including boat ramps.
(3) Water quality at the site will be damaged by the project. The depth of water at the end of
the pier is only 22 inches. The depth at the end of the ramp will be less. Boats using this
ramp will kick up the muddy bottom, causing water quality to be materially degraded so
as to hurt the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of these
Outstanding Resource Waters. For this reason, this project will result in degradation
of water quality, violating water quality standards including the state's "antidegradation"
standards.
(4) This project is part of a larger development project that has not been properly regulated.
At least eight lots are being developed within the 575 foot Area of Environmental
Concern that is adjacent to this Outstanding Resource Waters. The water quality impacts
of this development should be evaluated as one project, not in a piecemeal fashion.

Comments on Bruce Goepel Permit Application
Page 2,.February 18, 1998
For these reasons, we ask that this permit application be denied. If you continue to consider this
request, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:
(1) How will the use of this boat ramp be regulated so that it is maintained as a private
facility?
(2) Who will have permission to use this ramp?
(3) How will the owner prevent other people from using this ramp?
(4) Will the ability to use this ramp be sold to any other people as part of property
transactions?. If so, why isthis not a "commercial" facility?
.(5) Where will cars and boat:traiiers be parked that use this facility?
Thank you for answering these questions. Please let us know immediately of any actions you
take in response to, this permit application, including any requests for additional information.. As.
adjacent riparian property owners, we request to be notified by certified letters of any changes in
the permit application or permit decisions.
With best regards,
�
cc: Charles Jones, Division of Coastal.Management
Division of. Marine Fisheries
Division of Water Quality
Secretary Wayne McDevitt, Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources.
Governor James B: Hunt

February 18, 1998
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Bruce Goepel CAMA Permit Application
Dear Mr. Schecter:
MPR �MPNPG�MENZ
GGPSjP
This letter is from every property owner who lives adjacent to the above referenced project,
including the two adjacent riparian property owners, Floyd Heath and Linda Baynes.
We object to this project for the following reasons:
(1) The permit application is incomplete. The proposed development is on Outstanding
Resource Waters of Bogue Sound. The permit application provides no information on the
development that is proposed above mean high water. Given the narrow nature of the lot
(50 feet), we do not believe that the applicant can comply with the 25% impervious cover
that applies within 575 feet of mean high water.
(2) There is no buffer zone of at least 30 feet above mean high water for this development.
All development in the estuarine shoreline Area of Environmental Concern next to
Outstanding Resource Waters must provide for this buffer, including boat ramps.
(3) Water quality at the site will be damaged by the project. The depth of water at the end of
the pier is only 22 inches. The depth at the end of the ramp will be less. Boats using this
ramp will kick up the muddy bottom, causing water quality to be materially degraded so
as to hurt the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of these
Outstanding Resource Waters. For this reason, this project will result in degradation
of water quality, violating water quality standards including the state's "antidegradation"
standards.
(4) This project is part of a larger development project that has not been properly regulated.
At least eight lots are being developed within the 575 foot Area of Environmental
Concern that is adjacent to this Outstanding Resource Waters. The water quality impacts
of this development should be evaluated as one project, not in a piecemeal fashion.

r
Comments on Bruce Goepel Permit Application
Page 2,.February 18, 1998
For these reasons, we ask that this permit application be denied. If you continue to consider this
request, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:
(1) How will the use of this boat ramp be regulated so that it is maintained as a private
facility?
(2) Who will have permission to use this ramp?
(3) How will the owner prevent other people from using this ramp? .
(4) Will the ability to use this ramp be sold to any other people as part of property
transactions?. If so, why is this not a "commercial' facility?
.(5) Where will cars and boattraiiers be parked that use this facility?
Thank you for answering,these questions. Please let us know immediately of any actions you
take in response to this permit application, including any requests for additional information.. As.
adjacent riparian property owners, we request to be notified by certified letters of any changes in
the permit application or permit decisions.
Wni'th' best regards
cc: Charles Jones, Division of Coas'W-Management
Division of Marine Fisheries
Division of Water Quality
Secretary Wayne McDevitt, Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources.
Governor James B. Hunt

February 18, 1998
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Bruce Goepel CAMA Permit Application
Dear Mr. Schecter:
RFC"VED
MH,-� - 2 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
This letter is from every property owner who lives adjacent to the above referenced project,
including the two adjacent riparian property owners, Floyd Heath and Linda Baynes.
We object to this project for the following reasons:
(1) The permit application is incomplete. The proposed development is on Outstanding
Resource Waters of Bogue Sound. The permit application provides no information on the
development that is proposed above mean high water. Given the narrow nature of the lot
(50 feet), we do not believe that the applicant can comply with the 25% impervious cover
that applies within 575 feet of mean high water.
(2) There is no buffer zone of at least 30 feet above mean high water for this development.
All development in the estuarine shoreline Area of Environmental Concern next to
Outstanding Resource Waters must provide for this buffer, including boat ramps.
(3) Water quality at the site will be damaged by the project. The depth of water at the end of
the pier is only 22 inches. The depth at the end of the ramp will be less. Boats using this
ramp will kick up the muddy bottom, causing water quality to be materially degraded so
as to hurt the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of these
Outstanding Resource Waters. For this reason, this project will result in degradation
of water quality, violating water quality standards including the state's "antidegradation"
standards.
(4) This project is part of a larger development project that has not been properly regulated.
At least eight lots are being developed within the 575 foot Area of Environmental
Concern that is adjacent to this Outstanding Resource Waters. The water quality impacts
of this development should be evaluated as one project, not in a piecemeal fashion.

Comments on Bruce Goepel Permit Application
Page 2,.February18, 1998- .
For these reasons, we ask that this permit application be denied. If you continue to consider this
request, we would appreciate answers to the following questions:
(1) How will the use of this boat ramp be regulated so that it is maintained as a private
facility?
(2) Who will have permission to use this ramp?
(3) How will the owner preventother people from using this ramp?
(4) Will the ability to use this ramp be sold to any other people as part of property
transactions?. If so, why is this not a "commercial' facility?
.(5) Where will cars and boat:trailers be parked that use this facility?
'Thank you for answering these questions. Please let us know immediately of any actions you
take in response to this permit application, including any requests for additional information. As.
adjacent riparian property owners, we request to be notified by certified letters of any changes in
the permit application or permit decisions.
NC P�S"C— y
cc: Charles Jones, Division, of Coastal Management
Division of Marine Fisheries
Division of Water Quality .
Secretary Wayne McDevitt, Dept. of Environment and Natural Regources:
Governor James B. Hunt

February 16, 1998
Mr. Roger Schecter, Director
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application of Bruce Goepel dated 1-23-98
Location: Cedar Point, Carteret County
Dear Mr. Schecter:
Rr�CF��ED
MAR - 2 1998
COASIAI-MANAGEMENT
I am aware that an application as described above has been made to the Division of Coastal
Management for a permit to construct a launching ramp and a pier, for community use, on a
residential lot 50 feet in width immediately adjacent to my home. The applicant refers to
this as a "private" facility, but it is our understanding that it is for community use by
purchasers of lots from the applicant which do not have water frontage.
There is existing extensive spartina and juncus grass on this site, which would have to be
removed by the construction.
This area is currently open for shellfrshing and the water classification is SA. It would seem
probable that shellfishing in the area would be disturbed by this activity.
In addition, the body of water into which this ramp and pier would enter is a narrow and
shallow area separated from the main open water of the Intracoastal Waterway by a fringe of
marsh. It would seem evident that the action of boat propellers in this very shallow body of
water, coupled with the wakes which would be generated by boat traffic into and away from
the launching area, would create problems with silt.
The zoning in the area is R-20, which is limited to single family residential use with a
minimum lot size of approximately one-half acre. The location upon which the ramp and
pier is proposed to be built is accessed by a private road which is only 30 feet in width, and
this road in turn is accessed by another private easement which is 20 feet in width. It would
not be feasible for cars and boat trailers to be parked in the area without obstructing the
access of other property owners for ingress and regress to and from their properties.
I would be grateful if you could see that this letter, opposing the issuance of a permit in
response to this application, be placed in the file and that my name and mailing address be
made of record in the offices of the Division of Coastal Management such that I might be
informed of any correspondence, hearings, or any other activity associated with the
application process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Floyd Heath
cc: Charles Jones
i A6aP-6 cuitx MR 1+&CPr0 , TWJ P1201 r-r 5.1'fout'O
NpT- 86. µ O&v60 • 'T1-fE t�Afi6A /5 oa'-r Cn oN
LOW (,"TFA- if- A-Ac f- No Qoe-k 5PA-t FaYL TM-6
boars
No
PAkRVIwe 51)4-eE .
'V4-0 13Y-7Xa y3.pp %Oe-
A-rm
VIT7
L—IU- 1 Avk)"O TI-We
1w,aau,-6 oR �vNyo f
Jam, at,,
l 3 o S uNs6� A� u-E'

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF April 23, 1998
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199801108
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
RECEIVED
APR 2 4 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Reference the application of Bruce Goepel for a Department
of the Army permit to construct an elevated wood/concrete
boatramp in Bogue Sound, Cedar Point, Carteret County,
North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal
as presented by the application and your field investigation
report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in
the State authorization:
1. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in
strict compliance with the permit plans.
2. No excavated or fill materials will be placed at any
time, including temporarily, in any vegetated wetlands.
3. No excavated or fill materials will be placed at any
time, including temporarily, in any waters outside the footprint
of the boatramp.
4. This permit does not authorize any dredging.
Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned at
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
J ffrey H. Richter
Project Manager
Wilmington Field office

Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. William L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Two
151-B Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID.: 199801108 Applicant:
March 20, 1998
Bruce Goepel County: Carteret
Waterway: Bogue Sound Work: Pier, Boatramp
Mr. Larry Hardy Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
National Marine Fisheries Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Service, NOAA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Pivers Island Post Office Box 33726
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
kAr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7689
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Two
151-B Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Gentlemen:
Mr. William L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Pursuant to Action ID No. 198000291, the CAMA-Corps general permit/processing
agreement, a State Field investigation Report is enclosed. Your comments and/or
recommendations would be appreciated on or before April 20, 1998.
Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned, available at
telephone [phone].
Enclosure
Sincerely,
r-- vcS3-211
Wi'fiN
, ^ , J erH. Richter
Project Manager
Wilmington Field Office
RECEIVED
MAR 2 7 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
IN REPLY REFER TO March 26, 1998
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199801108
Mr. Bri
418 Shorel1R@MWve
Cedar Point, North Carolina 28584
Dear Mr. Gospel:
On February 11, 1991, we renewed general permit No 198000291 copy
enclosed), which provides Federal authorization for construction activities
that receive authorization from the State of North Carolina.
A review of your application received March 19, 1998, for Department of
the Army authorization to construct an elevated wood/concrete boat ramp in
Bogue Sound, Cedar Point, Carteret County, North Carolina, indicates it to be
a candidate for Federal authorization under this general permit. Accordingly,
the administrative processing of your application will be accomplished by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. Comments from Federal review
agencies will be furnished to the State.
If your application must be withdrawn from this general permit process
for any reason, you will be informed regarding its further management. If
there are no unresolved differences in State -Federal positions or policies,
the final action taken on your application by the State will result in your
receiving written notice from us that your application is consistent with the
general permit and you may commence your activity. Only after receiving such
confirmation should you begin work.
Your application, pursuant to Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act and
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, has been assigned Action ID No. 199801108.
It will be coordinated by the undersigned, available at, telephone (910)
251-4636.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey H. Richter
Project Manager
Wilmington Field Office
Enclosure

Copies Furnished (without encl)
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. William L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Two
151-B Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROUNA 2SQ2-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO March 26, 1998
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199801108
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Reference the application of Bruce Gospel for Department of the Army
authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to construct an elevated
wood/concrete boat ramp in Bogus sound, Cedar Point, Carteret County, North
Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our
administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification
has been obtained or waived.
According to our administrative regulations, 60 days is reasonable for
State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by May 19, 1998, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned, available at
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffrey H. Richter
Project Manager
Wilmington Field Office
Copy Furnished:
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

MCP
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FI NE T as We
COURTHOUSESQUARE
BEAUP011% N.C. 28516-1898
CMTE.iEr COUNTY 1 '.T"WSE
DATE: April 15, 1998
MEMO TO: Charles Pigott, LAMA Field Representative
FROhL• Katrina F. Marsball, Director of Planning & Iuspections !r-
SUBJECT: Bruce Goepel's Permit Application
This memo is in reference to the CAMA permit applied for by Bruce Goepel on Lot # 1 Plantation
Shores. The application specifies that hir- Goepel proposes to construct a boat ramp and pier for
private use_
Please be advised that on several occasions the Planning Department has spoken to Mr_ Goepel
pertaining to constructing a boat rampipier for use by the residents in Crystal Shores Subdivision.
While a private boat ramp/pier is permitted, any public use of this area would be prohibited.
RECEIVED
APR 2 2 1998
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

� 6x/�F
v �
� h
4
3JV3 E'
e o t I o r "`�61 t lecat a.4
ewa a OUR 9001 VIP dSA ..- 13sNC
_ ...
eao �I.. FI 1 . rl �E w1 sl of
' •' �, i[le L .' PM - I I I E 1 x[115 1
f I i I
q ;aa
site
f�p� Ail
1 v w
C ura - saro ®1
AN
J r"" � tecl F9R v
i q
e cca
taco oeu
y imo � xs.
�i mao "r
^a 4
+ .. 9ext
l 61LI
2xs�
1
$'C L
Ixxmxd
q J
t
6
S06i 9
Isla-
I'll"
*me"

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
AA
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR. May 20, 1998
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
ROGER N. SCHECTER
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This letter is with reference to your application for a Coastal Area Management
Act Major Development and state dredge and fill permit to construct an elevated wood
boat ramp, a pier and gravel driveway on property located on Sunset Drive in the
Plantation Shores Subdivision, in Cedar Point, in Carteret County. Although processing
of the application is nearing completion, additional time is needed for this office to
complete the review and make a decision on your request. Therefore, it is necessary
that the standard review time be extended. An additional 75 days is provided by G.S.
113A-122(c) which would mlre"7MMst 2 1998 the new deadline for reaching a
decision on your request. However, we expect to a action prior to that time and will
do so as soon as possible. In the interim, if you have any question on the status of your
application, do not hesitate to contact this office.
Very sincerely,
hn . Parke
r, er, Jr.
Major. Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: Charles O. Pigott
DCM-Morehead City
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611 -7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 2760E
PHONE [phone] FAX PIO-733-149S
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

A0,t,OFAA
NCDENR
JAMES S. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Mr. Goepel:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 18, 1998
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowled es receipt of your application for
State approval for development of your propect9'�in Plantation Shores Subdivision,
ROGER N. SCRECfER on Sunset Drive and adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County, NC.
DIRECTOR It was received on March 6, 1998, and appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The
projected deadline for making a decision is May 20, 1998. An additional 75-day review period is
provided by law when such time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been notified
of a final action by the initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review period extended.
Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an
additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing' postcard which must be
posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous
point along your property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be:
Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right -of --way fronting your property;
or at a point along the road right-of-way where a private road would lead one into your property.
Failure to post this notice could result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions
and notify me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from
reviewing agencies.
Cordially yours,
S
Charles O. Pigott
Coastal Management Representative
COP/dh
Enclosure
cc: John Parker
Charles S. Jones
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA 11 I51-8 HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NG 28557
PHONE [phone]S FAx [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50%RECYCLED/10%POST-CONSUMER PAPER

",D-VAL_ORE N TAX STATEMENT
PLEASE SEND PAYMENT
ToCARTERET COUNTY TAX OFFICE'.
COURTHOUSE SQUARE
BEAUFORT, N. C. 2n59.f.,
DESCRIPTION LJ 1 PLANTAI I1. N E;I IORES
TOWNSHIP . r� .i: 1 Tz OAV, TWf=
1994 91'J-IDOL BOND
07()
51. 45
:APE CARTERET FIRE
040
29. 94.0
:APE CARTrRET RESCU
O'S
18. 3E3
'OWN OF CEDAR POINT'
0.50
'36. 75
TOTAL DYE:
PRE --SORTED
FIRST CLASS
POSTAGE PAID
BEAUFORT, N. C.
PERMIT NO. 3
YEAR I RECORDfl i ACCOUNT NO.
IVY ) •.>
5.3 % -F 1 �5621V . 2 3
93851 393. 2.3
IMPORTANT: SEE REVERSE SIDE
TO:
GOEPEL BRUCE
9101 COAST GOARD RD
EMERALD ISLE: NC
GOEPSR9 285941018 1597 10 08/11/97
_ NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS
WE SEPT. 1, GOEPEL
NTEREST BEG] 418 SHORELINE DR
CEDAR POINT NC 26584-7204
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II
28594
JAN 2 6 1998

Prepared by C. R. Wheatly, III, Attorney, Beaufort, NC 28516
NORTH CAROLINA
CARTERET COUNTY
WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made this 9th day of February, 1994, by and
between E. Thomas Ennett, of Carteret County, North Carolina,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor" and Bruce L. Goepel, of
Carteret County, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as
"Grantee", whose principal address is
QOA-D , E-14EYLALD L5c1; t4. C, z 8 9-1 q
9lot co pt5T- 6 u rE2l)
W I T N E S S E T H•
That the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the
Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by
these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the
Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in White Oak Township, Carteret County, North Carolina
land being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at an existing P.K. Nail in the centerline
intersection of N.C. 24 (allowing a 100 foot right-of-
way) and N.C.S.R. 1113 (allowing a 60 foot right-of-way)
and running with the centerline of N. C. Highway 24 S
68-03-40 W, 2,190.07 feet to an existing nail and cap in
the centerline of N. C. Highway 24; thence leaving the
centerline of N. C. Highway 24 S 54-54-24 W, 210.51 feet
to an existing iron pipe in the southern right-of-way
line of N. C. Highway 24; the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said
beginning point further described as being the northeast
-corner of a 0.10 acre tract as shown in Map Book 28,
Page 34 in the Carteret County Registry; thence leaving
the point of beginning and running with the Dillard W.
Russell property line as shown on the aforementioned map
the following five (5) calls: S 20-23-15 E, 92.69 feet
to an iron pipe at the point of curvature of a curve to
the right, having as an arc 158.85 feet and a radius of
340.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S 07-00-
11 E, 157.41 feet to an iron pipe at the point of
reverse curve; thence continuing with a curve to the
left having as an arc 117.47 feet and a radius of 280.00
'feet and a chord bearing and distance of S 05-38-14 E,
116.61 feet; thence S 17-39-22 E, 163.62 feet to an iron
f �""
BOOK PAGE ___1�

pipe; thence N 68-04=05 E, 99.49 feet to an iron pipe in
the A. D. Ennett, Jr. line; thence with the A. D.
Ennett, Jr. and Lowell A. Fredeen line S 17-39-22 E,
903.47 feet to an existing concrete monument; thence
continuing with the Lowell A. Fredeen line S 00-05-38 W,
1,476.97 feet to an existing concrete monument in the
approximate highwater mark of Bogue Sound; thence with
the approximate highwater mark of Bogue Sound the
following twenty-four (24) calls: S 87-22-26 W, 52.31
feet; thence S 21-46-01 W, 73.38 feet; thence S 74-59-51
W, 93.51 feet; thence N 66-23-48 W, 42.90 feet; thence N
39-33-37 W, 42.28 feet; thence N 31-15-06 W, 49.27 feet;
thence N 89-43-34 W, 88.45 feet; thence N 85-11-23 W,
37.13 feet; thence N 64-00-03 W, 45.63 feet; thence N
71-39-42 W, 42.79 feet; thence N 64-18-01 W, 47.39 feet;
thence N 86-49--07 W, 39.25 feet; thence S 83-52-26 W,
43.90 feet; thence N 16-42-14 W, 40.65 feet; thence N
20-35-55 W, 35.29 feet; thence N 02-51-27 W, 42.82 feet;
thence S 83-01-44 W, 40.02 feet; thence N 59-08-07 W,
39.89 feet; thence N 29-01-52 W, 40.60 feet; thence N
25-22-43 W, 94.74 feet; thence N 33-49-34 W, 89.10 feet;
thence N 17-27-25 E, 117.55 feet; thence N 38-24-43 E,
23.86 feet; thence N 10-39--32 E, 62.55 feet to an
existing concrete monument; the common corner with Harry
L. Redfearn; thence with the Harry L. Redfearn line the
following two calls: S 89-53-42 W, 308.03 feet to an
existing concrete monument; thence S 00-33-35 W, 349.59
feet to an existing concrete monument in the northern
right-of-way of Sunset Drive (allowing a 30 foot right-
of-way); further described as the southeast corner of
Lot 26 of Plantation Shores as recorded in Map Book 3,
Page 117; thence along the northern right-of-way of
Sunset Drive N 89-31-25 W, 664.79 feet to an existing
concrete monument in a private easement to Sunset Drive;
thence with the private easement to Sunset Drive N 01-
01-32 E, 1,083.16 feet to an existing concrete monument,
a common corner with Larry and Billy Watson property;
thence along the Torrens Line as set forth in Special
Proceedings File Number 88-SP-159 (Torrens) as recorded
in Book RL5-A, Page 118, North 40-35-11 E, 1,451.51 feet
to an existing concrete monument, a common corner with'
Harold D. Gallion and the Gant Oil Company; thence with
the Gallion line S 23-00-30 E, 244.63 feet to an
existingconcrete monument; thence N 68-05-02 E, 257.64
feet to an existing concrete monument; thence N 17-38-24
W, 397.48 feet to an existing concrete monument corner
with Robert M. Russell; thence N 40-40-07 E, 62.46.feet
to an iron pipe; thence N 20-23-15 W, 91.02 feet to an
iron on the southern right-of-way of N. C. Highway 24;
thence along the southern right-of-way of N. C. Highway
24 N 67•-55--27 E, 60.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 70.97 acres, more or less.

3
The above being a portion of that tract of land described in
that Certificate of Title issued to Eugene Thomas Ennett,
bearing Registered No. 89-1 and of record in Book RL5-A, Page
119, said Certificate having been endorsed with Memorandum of
record Carteret County Registry, releasing same from the
provisions of Chapter 43 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina for purposes of conveynace only.
For further deed reference, see Deed Book 613, page 167.
Tract Two: All of Lot Number (1) as shown on Map of
"Plantation Shores" recorded in the office of the Register of
Deeds of Carteret County in Map Book 3, Page 117, together
with all riparian rights incident to said Lot.
For further deed reference, see Deed Book 179, page 507,
Carteret County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and
all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is
seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the
same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of
all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the
title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except
for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and
seal, the day and year first above written.
( SEAL )
E. Thomas Ennett
-rl�yy U4.d1-

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
I
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Print yo�,rwaree, f dress, and -ZIP Q-0e in this- box
�IIUC.-E (sOE�PC-L
4l8 SkoaE W-t DIZ
eeDAPI POI► F . PC
28g8v
It III fit IIuIf IfIfrIf rIt fit 'J„IIIII IIIIIIIf I,(It,IIII„III

SENDER:
v •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for adoitional services.
I also wish to receive the
a •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
following sewicas (for an
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form 90 that
we can return this
BMfa f00):
w card to you.
•Attach this form to the front of the mallpiece, or on the back if space does not
1, ❑ Addressees Address
d permit.
y • Wdle'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
2. El Restricted Delivery
•The Return Receipt will show to whom the aside was delivered and the date
e delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
N O 1# (Sa `l I.�CS
4b. vice Type `,
[I Registered �certitied
.
L h�.�Z V�U� D��
G/ h
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
❑ RetumReceiptforMerchandise ❑ COD
ci12-'r1S BC 12-o N L
21t/D 7
and fee is paid)
O
PS Fovn 11, December 1994 k 102595-97-e-01I9

,stick
postage stamps to article to cover First -Clan postage, certified mail fee, and
charges for any selected optional services (See front).
1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return
address leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service
ro
window or hand it to your rural carrier (no extra charge).
2. It you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the
return address of the aside, date, detach, and retain the receipt, and mail the article.
3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address
N
on a return receipt card, Form 3611, and attach h to the from of the article by means of the
v
gummed ends h space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article
'a
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number.
4. 9 you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the
0
addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the from of the article.
OD
s7
5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the from of this
receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in hem 1 of Form 3611.
ti
6. Save this receipt and present it if you make an inquiry. 102595-97-B-0145
to
__

I
N
m
rn
C
CO
W
E
0
N
a
Z 309 `821 953
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
SamtolNlif� pj (►JLS
Street o I�m�K l P65 CT
Office Post . state, & ZIP Code
Ply S u, 6AV.DB f NC Z 9 3f3
Postage
$ S S
Cerffied Fee
Speaal Delivery Fee
Resldded Delivery F
8
Reim Receipt Showing to
Whore & Date Defoe
Ream Rxept %VmQ to
Data & Addressee's AdBess
Z.
TOTAL Postage & Fees
Postmark or Date

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
-b2occ- Goc Pe-z- ,
41 S AJE DIZ
Cx.'DA'9- Pa OQT W c-
2f3Sel4

SENDER:
.Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
•Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form w that we can rot um this
card to you.
•Amach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back it apace does not
pemdt.
• Write Tatum Receipt Requested'on the maiipiece below the aside number.
•The Flat um Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
a e.e.a„ aww..,e.. 6— �., e.e.u.. •i
€Goy D i" I K
436 SuNs DfL
ca)/4L Pour uc
X
PS Form
or
, December 1994
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
mMr
❑ Registered �1 Certified
O Express Mail ❑ Insured
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
and fee is paid)
102595-97-e-0179

Stick postage stamps to article to cover First -Class postage, certified mail fee, and
charges for any selected optional services (See front).
1. If you want this receipt postmarked, slick the gummed stub to the night of the return
address leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service
window or hand it to your coral carver (no extra charge).
2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the night of the
return address of the artide, date, detach, and retain the receipt, and mail the article. r
3. 8 you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address
on a return receipt card, Fonn 3811, and attach it to the from of the article by means of the
gummed ends d space permits. Otherwise, allix to back of article. Endorse front of article
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED aclacern to the number.
4. 8 you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the
addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article.
L011
5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the from of this
receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 0
6. Save this receipt and present it 8 you make an inquiry. 102595-91-a-0145 1 T

Z 909 821 354
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
Sant to f:lz� D µ�rtH
Street 6 Number
436 S50P -t 2
Post Olfios, State, & ZIP Coda
C
2 g>;S
Postaa
5 S
C.4W Fee
Denary
ee
Resui Fee
�'re
Retum o
Wham & Date Dafiftatr—
fWWmF1eo*Sho"IDWhw,j
Data & Aftetsee's A&M
TOTAL Postage & Fees
s
�
Postmark or Date

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Bruce Goepel
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot # 1, on Sunset Drive in the Plantation Shores Subdivision,
adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 160-27 N-6 1984: 31-1189 K-21 1995: 39-474 0-20
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2577400 Y: 342500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA') k �� F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-4-98 & 2-20-98
Was Applicant Present - yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 1-26-98 revised 3-6-98
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW,EW,PTA,
m Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none
Planned -none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - boat ramp, pier and access driveway with turn around
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'/yr
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: (AREA]
T)T2FT1rPT) FTT.T.F.T) OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Coastal Wetlands (Pier footprint)
(Elevated wood boat ramp footprint)
126 sq. ft.
252 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
Open water (Pier footprint)
180 sq. ft
(Concrete boat ram
180 sq. ft.
`
(C) Other
High ground (Pier footprint)
60 sq. ft.
(Wood boat ramp footprint)
360 sq. ft.
Driveway and turn around
1830 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2988 sq. ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat
ramp, a pier and gravel driveway.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project is located at lot #1 in the Plantation Shores
Subdivision in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County. The lot is 200' long x 50'
wide and is bordered on the south by a small slough off Bogue Sound, on the north by
Sunset Drive, to the east by a house and to the west by a mobile home. The applicant is
also the developer of Plantation Shores Subdivision which consists of 32 lots off NC
Hwy 24. The lot is basically cleared except for a border of oaks and small bushes which
average approx. 50' wide near the waters edge. Waterward of this border of trees there
is a fringe of Coastal Wetlands approx. 20' wide vegetated mainly with Spartina
alterniflora. The slough is approx 107' wide from water edge to water edge. Water
depths range from a minus 9" near the marsh edge to a minus 39" approx. 30' beyond
the edge of the marsh. Waters at the project site have been classified as SA and are
open to the harvesting of shellfish. This area of Bogue Sound is located within
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).
The applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp over the Coastal
Wetlands with a pier adjacent to the ramp. The boat ramp would be approx. 64' long x
12' wide. The portion of the ramp on high ground and over the Coastal Wetlands would
be elevated and constructed of wood. The approx. 14' long x 12' wide portion of the
ramp beyond the Coastal Wetlands would be concrete. A pier 60' long x 6' wide would
be built on the east side of the ramp. A gravel driveway would be constructed in the
center of the property from Sunset Drive to within 30' of the MHW line. Two turn
around areas measuring approx. 20' long x 18' wide would also be constructed.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed would result in some short term
increases in turbidity during the placement of pilings for the ramp and pier. Approx.
400 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be shaded by the construction of the ramp and
pier. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of shallow bottom habitat would be loss due to the placement
of the concrete boat ramp in the water. No excavation or fill is being proposed for the
installation of the boat ramp. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of open water area would be shaded
by the installation of the pier. The body of water at the project site is approx. 107' from
water to water. The pier would be located 15' from the riparian property line to the east
and 25' from the riparian property line to the west. The pier would extend 30' beyond
the edge of the Coastal Wetlands, but would not be beyond the existing pier located on
the adjacent property to the west. The pier would also be within the one third rule. The
applicant is not proposing any structures or any high ground improvements to the
property except for the gravel driveway and two turn around areas. The driveway and
turn around areas would terminate thirty feet from the MHW, and the remainder of the
area to the water would be grassed and seeded. There has been much concern raised by

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
the neighbors and several letters written concerning whether the project is for private use
of the applicant or intended for the use of the subdivision the applicant is developing.
According to the Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) a public or commercial boat
ramp would not be consistent with the LUP. The installation of the gravel driveway and
turn around areas would increase the impervious area by 1830 sq. ft. The total built
upon area on this project would be 2,250 sq. ft. which is less than the 2,500 sq. ft.
which is allowed.
PREPARED BY: Charles O. Pigott
DATE: 3/17/98

Form DCM-4P-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name 6RUCL. GoC PEL
Address L4(8 5i o2CL("EE D2_
City CEDA \ PO ("'F State N C
Zip 2-6-584 Day Phone c[ 19 393 88�
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name SPHC
Address
City
Zip Day Phone
Fax
y IJ
1 JAN 2 6 1999
!7 ;
:Brat
b. City, town, community or landmark
CC'GAk PorN t-
c. Street address or secondary road number
LoT 1 5QUSf-- D2�VE
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? x Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) CO G U F Sa U lJ D
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
ONE PRt7A G0A1r CPMP
State WI`i}( A7)701NlN�- qrEi2
c.' Project name (if any) Iq 1A
NOTE; Pernut will be issued in name ojlanda rft), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County C-ikMRtT
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NSW W102<
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? PRIVATE
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
SIMP04 R SMAL— RAMP Po/L
LP,UNGHIN(r A GOAT-.: RAMP
+ Pier, !y a E YfUM A 21 r_y
IAIDOD r^.01,)57120GnrJ4
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
CM-WMVP 7;`Z111La 3
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 5_0 X Z()0
b. Size,of individual lot(s)— (5DIX200'
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-6 F=ge -
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
5A4JDV
e. Vegetation on tract L1&4T-L14 W coDC1p
f. Man-made features now on tract NOtJiF
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (consak the locai land we plan.)
1_ Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
KL5iAeL1TkA-L (R-20)
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No -
(Anach zoning compliance cerrificate, ifoppdcabk)
j•
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom?.
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes C No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes Z-- No
Coastal (marsh) _ X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach dom"wnrarion, if ava"k)
5A0 &XP65 U P To K1+W.
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
IJDVCE 0�J 5/T'�
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
No D/s cPAiZ6F5 14AJ-0u),V
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
CC U Q 7-Y U :l - A7- T tLL
ST _eEn_
S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by II" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

p 1 .
Form DCM-MP-I
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•�A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name F'LdYU //G/ifl
Address i0Al5CT nil_ i Jj11 - ✓c? O
Phone Im-i- 1j, giOt7
Name 1�lvaq 5A VAC-5
Address 0 1 1G/Af6 S CT
Phone (5A?Wr="71-J tiG
Name Z7313
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
N oN t_ KNo 63N
•; A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the f ✓ day of , 19 100
Print Name t3i2-V C E & C--va-
Signature
Landowner or Audwridd Agent
P45Vt5a -?,-18-gg
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
7t DCM W-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

'Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete. all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Erisdng Project
Length Width Death Death
12
..5:'.p/YSN
'.i..
A.
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes No
If yes, where?
Revised 03196

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL .
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source ojinjorwrion)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_,Y— Yes No
Revised 03/95
q�.-° �' Z,,..
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water o " / l ^— /6
(2) Dimensions of fill area =' 2COD� VErrF
—1- /"X /z, X itAMP
(3) Purpose of fill CoPeMQ5 Fog 9A-HP
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill -material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
&1.4
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
GvA71=/t- O0109 70 AID R)elfJG
1Ai57P1-1 A-yA,U
c. Will wetlands be c6ssed in trans orting equipment
to project site? _Yes >No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Applicant
Signature
I-23 yr--
Date - = iln- �� j: .,.u• i= .. .
Z-18�g8 JAN 2 6 1998
3_6-Lig

Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial _Community i�Private
(2) Number
(3) Length 60 A -PP 3v ova U�q�)
(4) Width roe MAX.
(5) Finger Piers _Yes _No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6) Platform(s) _Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
(8)_ Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines /S t K In.
(9) Width of water body Aj?f /D7
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL ;? n
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1)
Commercial Private
(2)
Length
(3)
_
Width
C. Groin
(e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1)
Number
(2)
Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1)
Length
(2)
Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3)
Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
31
JAN 2 6 1998
e. Mooring buoys
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4)
(5)
Width of water body _
Distance buoy(s) to
shoreline
be placed beyond
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
Applicant or­Pr4e-criName
Signature
Date /&V156D
_ l-23�y8
Revised 0319S

(SOLEPE-L
I FEB
sus is; III
I
'I'l. W45

M.16
5=AIM
5 SQUAIM
I- -
44 2� 5wu�
1
6,
09 1 .<2381
5 SQ,MM
42�2 IM RECYCLED WHIM 5 SURE
423 MRECYLYFD WHM 5MWE
-5.50-r.)v LOI: s i rn
Tj
}1-uvwlxoddv-
Mw T
F
-08
Nvg H910
jjnQ Crt ino 07. 101 1• 9
vu 5z LoQ 91 JAV I CA
5doullam
jo dlia.Ly
Bdij- m9-1 I-V 5"ga I
'A ---------
Iz
7 L7

ora.n
NIea-02-01 w .
68c 21' —\
PR!!o.rn %mmy
1
N SCS
28'8'=
r C
uu
I�
n CO
CO
COtri
1nruu
JUNCTION
Q'ScS
NOTE 25000 m E=e c from M.q 24
n ..1." Ib mmomaer n anrme
s I6a-Cc -01"E
662.60
S .A-... G-`'1 II
N 229 C0
22B z,
0
—le
CI:
2-14 -I-- 58 1 M I LC —7� LAS`1-
c.
S C_f aO.Cl"'W I.A
— 51s 6<'
If �TPw m
50 50 I sC SC II 5C' I 5C' I W' 15r. .. SG I 56
v
Sunset Dr. ; B6Bw' W
0. si 50' sc 5e
v< A 1.1 150' 16
In, me w of ",or" n
Sd So' so I So' I s
C
6.0
0
;�B. •B�dm
'moll
C
D
G J D N
r�
This map was drawn from recorded information only, as
. sncwn above. No field work was performed.
C12Y5;AL
514 o1LE5 .
SIP
FLId
m
$
c: M I swp 6t62' vP It
30 C N..—a
�� rl � '�IS"W y4J QI
N6g .BB' w
Cm. Mon. 1. IS M.W ai'/ W 'd •�
of nqn .aer mart I ^^
ms.zz I zs rFo
P, dt Ilj I Ise xrn I 4l0
��.. I MaC 9ma 20,�6� m
N
2\ \R ^ 0.
Surrey for
PLANTATION SHCR=S

Prepared by C. R. Wheatly, III, Attorney, Beaufort, NC 28516
NORTH CAROLINA
CARTERET COUNTY
WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made this 9th day of February, 1994, by and
between E. Thomas Ennett, of Carteret County, North Carolina,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor" and Bruce L. Goepel, of
Carteret County, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as
"Grantee", whose principal address is
9 1 0 1 Co 0}5T &Q rEft JD
V,OA-D , EkGF ALD L5c.ty , N.C. 2-95_lLf ;
W I T N E S S E T H•
That the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the
Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by
these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the
Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in White Oak Township, Carteret County, North Carolina
and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at an existing P.K. Nail in the centerline
intersection of N.C. 24 (allowing a 100 foot right-of-
way) and N.C.S.R. 1113 (allowing a 60 foot right-of-way)
and running with the centerline of N. C. Highway 24 S
68-03-40 W, 2,190.07 feet to an existing nail and cap in
the centerline of N. C. Highway 24; thence leaving the
centerline of N. C. Highway 24 S 54-54-24 W, 210.51 feet
to an existing iron pipe in the southern right-of-way
line of N. C. Highway 24; the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said
beginning point further described as being the northeast
-corner of a 0.10 acre tract as shown in Map Book 28,
Page 34 in the Carteret County Registry; thence leaving
the point of beginning and running with the Dillard W.
Russell property line as shown on the aforementioned map
the following five (5) calls: S 20-23-15 E, 92.69 feet
to an iron pipe at the point of curvature of a curve to
the right, having as an arc 158.85 feet and a radius of
340.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S 07-00-
11 E, 157.41 feet to an iron pipe at the point of
reverse curve; thence continuing with a curve to the
left having as an arc 117.47 feet and a radius of 280.00
'feet and a chord bearing and distance of S 05-38-14 E,
116.61 feet; thence S 17-39-22 E, 163.62 feet to an iron
f
BOOK
PAGE �b

A -
pipe; thence N 68-04=05 E, 99.49 feet to an iron pipe in
the A. D. Ennett, Jr. line; thence with the A. D.
Ennett, Jr. and Lowell A. Fredeen line S 17-39-22 E,
903.47 feet to an existing concrete monument; thence
continuing with the Lowell A. Fredeen line S 00-05-38 W,
1,476.97 feet to an existing concrete monument in the
approximate highwater mark of Bogue Sound; thence with
the approximate highwater mark of Bogue Sound the
following twenty-four (24) calls: S 87-22-26 W, 52.31
feet; thence S 21-46-01 W, 73.38 feet; thence S 74-59-51
W, 93.51 feet; thence N 66-23-48 W, 42.90 feet; thence N
39-33-37 W, 42.28 feet; thence N 31-15-06 W, 49.27 feet;
thence N 89-43-34 W, 88.45 feet; thence N 85-11-23 W,
37.13 feet; thence N 64-00-03 W, 45.63 feet; thence N
71-39-42 W, 42.79 feet; thence N 64-18-01 W, 47.39 feet;
thence N 86-49-07 W, 39.25 feet; thence S 83-52-26 W,
43.90 feet; thence N 16-42-14 W, 40.65 feet; thence N
20-35-55 W, 35.29 feet; thence N 02-51-27 W, 42.82 feet;
thence S 83-01-44 W, 40.02 feet; thence N 59-08-07 W,
39.89 feet; thence N 29-01-52 W, 40.60 feet; thence N
25-22-43 W, 94.74 feet; thence N 33-49-34 W, 89.10 feet;
thence N 17-27-25 E, 117.55 feet; thence N 38-24-43 E.,
23.86 feet; thence.N 10-39-32 E, 62.55-feet to an.
existing concrete monument; the common corner with Harry
L. Redfearn; thence with the Harry L. Redfearn line the
following two calls: S 89-53-42 W, 308.03 feet to an
existing concrete monument; thence S 00-33-35 W, 349.59
feet to an existing concrete monument -in -the northern
right-of-way of Sunset Drive (allowing a 30 foot right-
of-way); further described'as the southeast corner of
Lot 26 of Plantation Shores as recorded in Map -Book 3,
Page 117; thence'along the northern right-of-way of
Sunset Drive N 89-31-25 W, 664.79 feet to an existing
concrete monument in a private, easement to Sunset Drive;
thence with the private easement to Sunset Drive N 01-
01-32 E, 1,083.16 feet to an existing concrete monument,
a common corner with Larry and Billy Watson property;
thence along the Torrens Line as set forth in Special
Proceedings File Number 88-SP-.159 (Torrens) as recorded
in Book RL5-A, Page 118, North 40-35-11 E, 1,451.51 feet
to an existing concrete monument, a common corner with'
Harold D. Gallion and the Gant Oil Company; thence with
the Gallion line S 23-00-30 E, 244.63 feet to an
existing concrete monument; thence N 68-05-02 E, 257.64
feet to an existing concrete monument; thence N 17-38-24
W, 397.48 feet to an existing concrete monument corner
with Robert M. Russell; thence N 40-40-07 E, 62.46 feet
to an iron pipe; thence N 20-23-15 W, 91.02 feet to an
iron on the southern right-of-way of N. C. Highway 24;
thence along the southern right-of-way of N. C. Highway
24 N 67•-55--27 E, 60.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 70.97 acres, more or less.

ya ,
3
The above being a portion of that tract of land described in
that Certificate of Title issued to Eugene Thomas Ennett,
bearing Registered No. 89-1 and of record in Book RL5-A, Page
119,.said Certificate having been endorsed with Memorandum of
record Carteret County Registry, releasing same from the
provisions of Chapter 43 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina for purposes of conveynace only.
For further deed reference, see Deed Book 613, page 167.
Tract Two: All of Lot Number (1) as shown on Map of
"Plantation Shores" recorded in the office of the Register of
Deeds of Carteret County in Map Book 3, Page 117, together
with all riparian rights incident to said Lot.
For further deed reference, see Deed Book 179, page 507,
Carteret County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and
all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is
seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the
same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of
all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the
title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except
for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and
seal, the day and year first above written.
!' ( SEAL )
E. Thomas Ennett

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Bruce Goepel
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot N 1, on Sunset Drive in the Plantation Shores Subdivision,
adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 160-27 N-6 1984: 31-1189 K-21 1995: 39-474 0-20
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2577400 Y: 342500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA ) k -Z)J F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-4-98 & 2-20-98
Was Applicant Present - yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 1-26-98 revised 3-6-98
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW,EW,PTA,
m Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none
Planned - none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - boat ramp, pier and access driveway with turn around
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'/yr
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
nDT:;nnPn FTT T F.TI OT 4F.R
126 sq. ft.
252 sq. ft.
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Coastal Wetlands (Pier footprint)
(Elevated wood boat ramp footprint)
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
Open water (Pier footprint)
180 sq. ft
Concrete boat ram
180 sq. ft.
(C) Other
High ground (Pier footprint)
(Wood boat ramp footprint)
Driveway and turn around
60 sq. ft.
360 sq. ft.
1830 s . ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2988 sq. ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat
ramp, a pier and gravel driveway.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project is located at lot #1 in the Plantation Shores
Subdivision in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County. The lot is 200' long x 50'
wide and is bordered on the south by a small slough off Bogue Sound, on the north by
Sunset Drive, to the east by a house and to the west by a mobile home. The applicant is
also the developer of Plantation Shores Subdivision which consists of 32 lots off NC
Hwy 24. The lot is basically cleared except for a border of oaks and small bushes which
average approx. 50' wide near the waters edge. Waterward of this border of trees there
is a fringe of Coastal Wetlands approx. 20' wide vegetated mainly with Spartina
alterniflora. The slough is approx 107' wide from water edge to water edge. Water
depths range from a minus 9" near the marsh edge to a minus 39" approx. 30' beyond
the edge of the marsh. Waters at the project site have been classified as SA and are
open to the harvesting of shellfish. This area of Bogue Sound is located within
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).
The applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp over the Coastal
Wetlands with a pier adjacent to the ramp. The boat ramp would be approx. 64' long x
12' wide. The portion of the ramp on high ground and over the Coastal Wetlands would
be elevated and constructed of wood. The approx. 14' long x 12' wide portion of the
ramp beyond the Coastal Wetlands would be concrete. A pier 60' long x 6' wide would
be built on the east side of the ramp. A gravel driveway would be constructed in the
center of the property from Sunset Drive to within 30' of the MHW line. Two turn
around areas measuring approx. 20' long x 18' wide would also be constructed.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed would result in some short term
increases in turbidity during the placement of pilings for the ramp and pier. Approx.
400 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be shaded by the construction of the ramp and
pier. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of shallow bottom habitat would be loss due to the placement
of the concrete boat ramp in the water. No excavation or fill is being proposed for the
installation of the boat ramp. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of open water area would be shaded
by the installation of the pier. The body of water at the project site is approx. 107' from
water to water. The pier would be located 15' from the riparian property line to the east
and 25' from the riparian property line to the west. The pier would extend 30' beyond
the edge of the Coastal Wetlands, but would not be beyond the existing pier located on
the adjacent property to the west. The pier would also be within the one third rule. The
applicant is not proposing any structures or any high ground improvements to the
property except for the gravel driveway and two turn around areas. The driveway and
turn around areas would terminate thirty feet from the MHW, and the remainder of the
area to the water would be grassed and seeded. There has been much concern raised by

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE N3
the neighbors and several letters written concerning whether the project is for private use
of the applicant or intended for the use of the subdivision the applicant is developing.
According to the Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) a public or commercial boat
ramp would not be consistent with the LUP. The installation of the gravel driveway and
turn around areas would increase the impervious area by 1830 sq. ft. The total built
upon area on this project would be 2,250 sq. ft. which is less than the 2,500 sq. ft.
which is allowed.
PREPARED BY: Charles O. Pigott
DATE: 3/17/98

Form DCM-MP-I
APPLICATION ';�;_
JAN 2 6 1998 1
I �
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT CC'bAR- Po i n(T
a. Landowner:
Name BR\)Cl: GOE'PEL.
Address L418 5t+32C--L-tN E DR -
City CEDAP, f C (M'F State N e
Zip 28-5'E?4: Day Phone [phone]q-
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name S P-1-1 C
Address
City _
Zip _
Fax
Day Phone
c. Street address or secondary road number
LoT i 5tJQSET 1)2\VE'
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) 130 G U G- Sa U ra D
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
ONE PRIVY (3aafr cpf-ip
State UJITI- F-D?o/N/NG 5mr:-LL PIER
c.' Project name (if any) N A
NOTE. Perndt will be issued in m of laudow (s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County. C� R1 ER CT
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NEW W o R K
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? PRIVATE
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
S/MPL`! R 5MALL RAMP Fb/L
U,,UN (-PW(r 4 130FT.• RAMP
+ PIER TO RE (UHAP-1LY
W DO D C0A1 S 7TLUG7TMI�
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
r a. Size of entire tract � X 200�
b. Size of individual lot(s) (5Z rK 200
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-6 SET
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
S5 DV
e. Vegetation on tract L-1&i-�T'L4 W 00DC1)
f. Man-made features now on tract Noi.l(-
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local lane an plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
K 5 i D EuT1A-L ( R -2a )
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Anach Zoning compliance certificate, ifappPcmble)
j•
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? -
archaeological assessment been
Yes >� No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes X__ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentaion, if available)
5A0 6(LK55 UP TU K9W.
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
&[D/JC OQ 5/7_E
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
No D/s r_4mGE5 14A oLdAJ
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
CO U IJ 7-Y LArrV =2 Aff- rtiff'
STILe"T
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy or the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
JAN 2 6 1993
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name FLf)YD Ilt Aril
Address Oct- a.)A/e ✓ct./I.
Phone 312�-- 9/etf _
Name I�IWM A YPF5
Address D l l IA16 S GT
Phone 1&eX-5fYNr Gitr2r ew tic -
Name 2--7313
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
NoNC7 IKMotiN
•; A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the gt day of , 19 -l�
Print Name V in) Cr.
Signature _ 1�22�
landowner or Arahonz Agent
,20-456P -,?-19--16
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
JL DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM W-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

'Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete. all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Eusdng Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Y�V
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL .
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of info, don)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
I. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_,-. Yes No
1.1
i
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water l " ' ! ^— 16 /
(2) Dimetsions of fill area < 7` P Z DR I uEWF
-4- / "X /z' X 4-- 16 rtAMP
(3) Purpose of fill COPCI �-Fog 9-A-HP
Will fill material be placed in coastal
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
wetlands
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
111.4
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
GvA7-c-ir- AmR 7U k1D 0ellie5-
/AJ571=71-Z,A-V,,)A1
c. Will wetlands be crDssed in transporting equipment
to project site? _Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
• 'J
Applicant
Signature
Tom.^ (- 23 -J5
1 L_
2.—) 8-q8 i JAN 2 6 1953
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1)
_ Commercial _Community XPrivate
(2)
Number 1
(3)
Length 60(A-PP 3c� ov�2 Ude}11aZ)
(4)
Width roe MRK.
(5)
Finger Piers _Yes _No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6)
Platform(s) _Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7)
Number of slips proposed
(8)
Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines /S t H tA/•
(9)
Width of water body A& ! 0%
(10)
Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1)
Commercial Private
(2)
Length
(3)
Width
c. Groin
(e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1)
Number
(2)
Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
JAN 2 6 1998
e. Mooring buoys
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
f. Mooring, structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
Applicant or ec ame
�G
Signature
Dace /&V15 6 p
-1-23�g8
Revised 03/95

-31R.Uce c-o -PeL
FEB 0 9 1998
g'
r.rk,K
I

�BILUCIE 6-oePIL RAMP ?tC-tz K SEci7ou �ts� - 6=q
TYPICAL- DILL IAM"I
t!
2�
2>�MP Da<PrttS A-r LOW SIDE '
i6i14 L AT END of
CoAWL WUYLA00-
l 5 our � 15 our 25aut ,
RAH? = ��}� LOW6 it 10 our � 20 our 30 out
.12� wtflE
N 16N UN K b bOD�RA�t P
wooDEN I 6Xbo
NIGH
- _ - — — LOW
COASTAL I,uETLnMnS14
_..,_.__. ,.._ .._
LOW 'PLUS H co" c¢c-fLe-
_
MHW
� � A?PP_rJXIH+�•rFt.`( MUD�SAa�+D . So'rT�M - �;
TIDE DIFFa6ljcE
UJA1��' 15 ' 10.7 AeQOss
3tl nmg 3LHMmlJgum,9nmg
3tlVIlOSS 3LHM O3l'J.1'J3tl Wl 26E>
%� 3tlJlIOSs dSR3l3 s>33tlsaoz seeze O�Ba1�02NN ��
wao 5 s 3x3 oms� ,sae
3HVfID5HiTlli •5133HS W5 20[SI

214 -r- 58 1 M I LC --:�P LAST-
G 60
Nle°-02-0i w
EBc.2i —
ReG!e°rn Precerry
NCS°-a:
5C6
Q415S up -et
NOTE 25000 at -eeuemr- m M.y 24
n Pfa1f<, rK rcmamaer n Pr,wre
6 IB°-C2 -pf"E
_ 662.6p
d -c ...N
515 6'.
c..
15C
5C
15C
5C
ti' I
5C' CC SC 5C
I 5.. 5G I 50
SJc-_
cl
2'.,
�•
v
:�3'
In.
N Jr-<6 :o w 1
22e 02'
C12YS rAt_
SNo1LE5•
1 <5' so• a S0 N 9: M • s 8?4L 5 3SEyv➢
SCr'-12-3i -W i - a-• " '-T�4 rwa i In me ux °f im°ctY n 9C CO 95ssr 2C•I srr .. %e r t to E _�
6GJ0' Sunset Dr. NBs°oo'W enf'Y �_, �nf.r
:mmr<n E5°-<T.2_'W c5 SC 5D Si 50• 5C SC 50 np 5v 'A 56 50 666"IBE 'n SC ~�ICSOb'—� 39 aL W
66.:Jd-eSE n 68"-OB-25E 'm
O — N W 5wa b N. IIP 3 P4•Y0
1—
,5 . I Lip t�ci LJ Ll U i 5 v 'Li 3 • �2 ,b �. i ry I ..a Q62•
�l N I-b:15'W
-
T.
Cm. mnn. Le> IS N-W
}v p jq• _ ... ���i , °I nqn .artr mwn l I- W fP^
r1y N..B. 12I ;9 � N
5eY \ 10r01nory F'9 ti l PP.Y=.Im
9m5 20, Pq 6j
3 O U N N�, arm
eC _ G D `/9 30.•W ?36• I t n n
rli n I l 9:�5 n�p�
1112. � 0 I 6urwy Inr
o rf�o This map was drawn from recorded information only, as _
T, ao "Ifll sncwn above. No field work was performed. PLANTATION SHORES ' .
f ]y -

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Bruce Goepel
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot 1i i, on Sunset Drive in the Plantation Shores Subdivision,
adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 160-27 N-6 1984: 31-1189 K-21 1995: 39-474 0-20
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2577400 Y: 342500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA ) k -zJ F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-4-98 & 2-20-98
Was Applicant Present - yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 1-26-98 revised 3-6-98
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW,EW,PTA,
© . Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none
Planned -none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - boat ramp, pier and access driveway with turn around
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'/yr
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
71R1:;T)nPn FTTIFT) OTHER
(A) Vegetated W=otpnn
Coastal Wetl
(Elevated wo
126 sq. ft.
252 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
Open water (Pier footprint)
180 sq. ft
Concrete boat ram
180 sq. ft.
(C) Other
High ground (Pier footprint)
60 sq. ft.
(Wood boat ramp footprint)
360 sq. ft.
Driveway and turn around
1830 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2988 sq. ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat
ramp, a pier and gravel driveway.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project is located at lot #1 in the Plantation Shores
Subdivision in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County. The lot is 200' long x 50'
wide and is bordered on the south by a small slough off Bogue Sound, on the north by
Sunset Drive, to the east by a house and to the west by a mobile home. The applicant is
also the developer of Plantation Shores Subdivision which consists of 32 lots off NC
Hwy 24. The lot is basically cleared except for a border of oaks and small bushes which
average approx. 50' wide near the waters edge. Waterward of this border of trees there
is a fringe of Coastal Wetlands approx. 20' wide vegetated mainly with Spartina
alterniflora. The slough is approx 107' wide from water edge to water edge. Water
depths range from a minus 9" near the marsh edge to a minus 39" approx. 30' beyond
the edge of the marsh. Waters at the project site have been classified as SA and are
open to the harvesting of shellfish. This area of Bogue Sound is located within
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).
The applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp over the Coastal
Wetlands with a pier adjacent to the ramp. The boat ramp would be approx. 64' long x
12' wide. The portion of the ramp on high ground and over the Coastal Wetlands would
be elevated and constructed of wood. The approx. 14' long x 12' wide portion of the
ramp beyond the Coastal Wetlands would be concrete. A pier 60' long x 6' wide would
be built on the east side of the ramp. A gravel driveway would be constructed in the
center of the property from Sunset Drive to within 30' of the MHW line. Two turn
around areas measuring approx. 20' long x 18' wide would also be constructed.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed would result in some short term
increases in turbidity during the placement of pilings for the ramp and pier. Approx.
400 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be shaded by the construction of the ramp and
pier. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of shallow bottom habitat would be loss due to the placement
of the concrete boat ramp in the water. No excavation or fill is being proposed for the
installation of the boat ramp. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of open water area would be shaded
by the installation of the pier. The body of water at the project site is approx. 107' from
water to water. The pier would be located 15' from the riparian property line to the east
and 25' from the riparian property line to the west. The pier would extend 30' beyond
the edge of the Coastal Wetlands, but would not be beyond the existing pier located on
the adjacent property to the west. The pier would also be within the one third rule. The
applicant is not proposing any structures or any high ground improvements to the
property except for the gravel driveway and two turn around areas. The driveway and
turn around areas would terminate thirty feet from the MHW, and the remainder of the
area to the water would be grassed and seeded. There has been much concern raised by

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
the neighbors and several letters written concerning whether the project is for private use
of the applicant or intended for the use of the subdivision the applicant is developing.
According to the Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) a public or commercial boat
ramp would not be consistent with the LUP. The installation of the gravel driveway and
turn around areas would increase the impervious area by 1830 sq. ft. The total built
upon area on this project would be 2,250 sq. ft. which is less than the 2,500 sq. ft.
which is allowed.
PREPARED BY: Charles O. Pigott
DATE: 3/17/98

Form DCM4P-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name Q R U GG- GO E P E L_
Address Li L 8 5i b2CL-1 N E DR
City CEDAR P'piNT State N C-
Zip 26-'� g4 ' Day Phone I11 393 984+
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name SF'MC
Address
City
Zip Day Phone
Fax
State
C.' Project name (if any) /-1 A
NOTE: Pent %Q be issued in mme of lanndomer(s), and/or
project mme.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Cif RJR CT
JAN 2 6 1999
! i i
coy-��r.... .... . .....�:or
b. City, town, community or landmark
CC -DAP- Pot N.T
c. Street address or secondary road number
LoT 1 5UQSe-r DZVE'
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) (330 G U E- Sa V N D
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
ome m7F,= r3oAr P-T-MF
lul`li-! )Ln70/NlIJ6- 5M/^--LL P(EiZ
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NEW WO2>C
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? p2lw-TE
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
SIMW-f R 5MkiL- A-AMp Foe
LP, UNLFIIIJ(r R GOAT-.: /LAMp
+ piER '1-0 RE ?2IMA21L4
IA Dt) D Con) 5 T(L0CnMf
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
r r
a. Size of entire tract J6D X 2.©O
b. Size of individual lot(s) (5DIX200
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-6 y'EEr
d. Soil type(s) and texture's) of tract
SWDV
e. Vegetation on tract L-1G I-T-Lq W 000ZD
L Man-made features now on tract l`J6Qi -
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the toed land we plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
St. How is the tract zoned by local government?
tit s i n EUTL�L ( R -24 )
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach Zoning conpiiance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes C No
Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
Shu6XP6o UP -ru K4AJ.
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
MDNc OQ sis�
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
Aj0 Dis r_;,4A2/E5 IGN-aWtil
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
co U N Tlv l v TL__1Z_ AT- TTte'
=TT?_�
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by II" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03195

Form DCM4P-1
-
JAN 2 6 i993
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•'A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name r-1-dY0 /lt-l17-11
Address CW)Lhatf D12- cel,) ill_ ✓ct.10
Phone I 1 ,--i - 1 �, -- St 1131
Name % 5,4 YA)E�3;
Address D l 1,/-!Al6 S CT
Phone 11&334TT 5-A20 -AJ tiL
Name 2--7> U
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
NoNt= KNowN
•; A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fad,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 2Y day of �a'�et av , 19 ��
Print Name 1�3i?-ticL & Va-
Signature Ivy
Imdowner or Author'Authorizk Agent
�tiS�D �18-fig
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
)( DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03195

'Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to completeall
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
t94
12
, -
Y ...... :
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes — No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No
If yes, where?
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-2
1 zo=
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes _ No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Rpprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL .
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of 140 maeon)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material'
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_,_ Yes No
b.
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water A " ' l ti /G'
(2) Dimensions of fill area
X rZ P
(3) Purpose of fill FO2 9-A-HP
t3e4)W W 4Te12 f Q aly ' Aq
Will fill material be placed in coastal
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
wetlands
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
& A
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
NAT)::iZ. P1)/'1R TO AID Plwlz-
/N s7kt/ /_ .4-VAA1
c. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? —Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
• '4
Applicant
Signature "1C
Date
-2,-1 g,Q8 j JAN 2 6 1998 �` 3
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major e. Mooring buoys
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
(1)
_ Commercial _Community _ Private
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
(2)
Number
this proposed project.
(3)
Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
\ /
(1) _ Commercial _Community X Private
(2) Number I
(3) Length 60 ApP 3e?"bv&y-�U.,4(g)
(4)
Width of water body
(4) Width roe MAY,
(5)
Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
(5) Finger Piers _Yes _ No
shoreline
(i) Number
(ii) Length
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(iii) Width
(1)
_ Commercial —Community _Private
(6) Platform(s) _ Yes _ No
(2)
Number
(i) Number
(3)
Length
(ii) Length
(4)
Width
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
g. Other (Give comprere description)
(S) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines f H IN.
(9) Width of water body APe 107
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL ;�'T
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length _
_
_
IJICl1C.t CCI�L
(3) Width
Applicant or ec ame
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
Signature
(1) Number
r
(2) Length(s)
Date
/&V1 S 9p e—t9-- TF
d. Breakwater (e.g, wood, sheetpile, etc.)
7- ,Z y_qg
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
Revised 03195

_ . ;il'9 'INlt
6�
�� 9661 6 833
r.,

- A, '.
vePM5 A-T Low 'T(DIE
AT c-Hp OF
CDAWL DJUTLAPI, I
5 ur 16 alIr 25 OUT
to OUT 201OUT 30'aur
-75 72 33
P160 'BANK
/-r%
-U5 6
MAW
it
14'
COASTAL WIETLAOD.S Coli e-ec-T,15r
MLbJ
APMWIMATRY IWP/5AND SrATVA
2.:
UJAIMUL 15 101 IACIZ05-5- . i
ram,
M ..I MR G
nsa�z
33=9��S�mm IBCZV
I

a-UNCT/oN 2 -4- SS I MILL LAST -
a/- - NOTE '_90 oo °I ,,e :ram N.y 2= \ \ Daft°, [mDmD[, .a D„rD„ C12Y5 AL
0 C-7S1
6Ie°-02'-0�"E
\ 6B2.6C
N IB°_02-Oi
Pe6!e°rn Prooerq
NCS°ip.03'E' 6 C5°-40,2, N "m
50E 2E' �� I 5156<'
Fl
f
1
50 5. G x We s o to 50 W
ja
ko,
s�z_�cc 1111' I �^ 5 � .v =V :'J ✓ •J .� F n
N a.' G6 :6 Y: I I I `J T•�ya o f
229 02'
m E Be. IE E \'D
<ti 60 en ✓ an' a-. }ri .�(� r; 687 C6-3rEY xrD
.0 or.— sC-42- T.h Imo la w mo ^x DI impay ^ 95 °2
3W0 W Sunset Dr. ~ 95°-CO' w rlr 9000' vvM1� v . • r.•
Dour• n 5C,• SG 50 ato
50' 50 50 50' 6e6°.IB E l i -5C2'
a ':65e G9--_'w 55' 5C S0 Y" 50 is6:go'- .. ly,�.
.r as cro,, to f "o
E� m 6 e'°-09-35"E O
D 9(O\ rII^
D,!a 1O Pro..HeCTh
i ' '� aJ •� U li' L L ' m ^ a j x.I I 6I62• v� N IA.
o °s r N=` - ry
eal
irk Coo. Man. 6n M.N.W W p
\ 09Y Ik , of nqn waNr moo I IF O
P�Q-DIY � u.9. 22 1 29
^IeY \or4i�Y ti•9 mr ��� PC. <I I I "a
I\F Gt\om n - .i -
3
p U N
Bd G D
L 'Till__
01 n I L,• ,,.N�.
S
s°rr<y for
I (w;� This map was drawn from recorded information only, as
CO
lCO �i, �_li °_h_xn above. No field work was performed. PLANTATION SHORES -

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Bruce Goepel
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot N 1, on Sunset Drive in the Plantation Shores Subdivision,
adjacent to Bogue Sound, in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 160-27 N-6 1984: 31-1189 K-21 1995: 39-474 0-20
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2577400 Y: 342500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA ) k --t,) F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-4-98 & 2-20-98
Was Applicant Present - yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 1-26-98 revised 3-6-98
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW,EW,PTA,
m Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none
Planned -none
(F) . Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - boat ramp, pier and access driveway with turn around
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'/yr
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
T)PFTN,FTI FIT.T.FT) OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Coastal Wetlands (Pier footprint)
(Elevated wood boat ramp footprint)
126 sq. ft.
252 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
Open water (Pier footprint)
180 sq. ft
(Concrete boat ram
180 sq. ft.
(C) Other
High ground (Pier footprint)
60 sq. ft.
(Wood boat ramp footprint)
360 sq. ft.
Driveway and turn around
1830 s . ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2988 sq. ft.
'(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes

FIELD INYESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat
ramp, a pier and gravel driveway.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project is located at lot #1 in the Plantation Shores
Subdivision in the Town of Cedar Point, Carteret County. The lot is 200' long x 50'
wide and is bordered on the south by a small slough off Bogue Sound, on the north by
Sunset Drive, to the east by a house and to the west by a mobile home. The applicant is
also the developer of Plantation Shores Subdivision which consists of 32 lots off NC
Hwy 24. The lot is basically cleared except for a border of oaks and small bushes which
average approx. 50' wide near the waters edge. Waterward of this border of trees there
is a fringe of Coastal Wetlands approx. 20' wide vegetated mainly with Spartina
alterniflora. The slough is approx 107' wide from water edge to water edge. Water
depths range from a minus 9" near the marsh edge to a minus 39" approx. 30' beyond
the edge of the marsh. Waters at the project site have been classified as SA and are
open to the harvesting of shellfish. This area of Bogue Sound is located within
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).
The applicant is proposing to construct an elevated wood boat ramp over the Coastal
Wetlands with a pier adjacent to the ramp. The boat ramp would be approx. 64' long x
12' wide. The portion of the ramp on high ground and over the Coastal Wetlands would
be elevated and constructed of wood. The approx. 14' long x 12' wide portion of the
ramp beyond the Coastal Wetlands would be concrete. A pier 60' long x 6' wide would
be built on the east side of the ramp. A gravel driveway would be constructed in the
center of the property from Sunset Drive to within 30' of the MHW line. Two turn
around areas measuring approx. 20' long x 18' wide would also be constructed.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed would result in some short term
increases in turbidity during the placement of pilings for the ramp and pier. Approx.
400 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be shaded by the construction of the ramp and
pier. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of shallow bottom habitat would be loss due to the placement
of the concrete boat ramp in the water. No excavation or fill is being proposed for the
installation of the boat ramp. Approx. 180 sq. ft. of open water area would be shaded
by the installation of the pier. The body of water at the project site is approx. 107' from
water to water. The pier would be located 15' from the riparian property line to the east
and 25' from the riparian property line to the west. The pier would extend 30' beyond
the edge of the Coastal Wetlands, but would not be beyond the existing pier located on
the adjacent property to the west. The pier would also be within the one third rule. The
applicant is not proposing any structures or any high ground improvements to the
property except for the gravel driveway and two turn around areas. The driveway and
turn around areas would terminate thirty feet from the MHW, and the remainder of the
area to the water would be grassed and seeded. There has been much concern raised by

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BRUCE GOEPEL/CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE N3
the neighbors and several letters written concerning whether the project is for private use
of the applicant or intended for the use of the subdivision the applicant is developing.
According to the Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) a public or commercial boat
ramp would not be consistent with the LUP. The installation of the gravel driveway and
turn around areas would increase the impervious area by 1830 sq. ft. The total built
upon area on this project would be 2,250 sq. ft. which is less than the 2,500 sq. ft.
which is allowed.
PREPARED BY: Charles O. Pigott
DATE: 3/17/98

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name BRUc GOSPEL
Address L4[ 8 5rto2C—'U N E' Dq _
City CEDAk f 01 NT" State N C-
Zip 2r3,5 &4i Day Phone [phone]`3�,
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City _
Zip
Fax
b. City, town, community or landmark
cc—?ge VOrrl
c. Street address or secondary road number
LOT I. 5UQ.SF7- C2`.`/=
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) C`OGUS_ 150VNAD
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
S>TMC a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
014E PAIV/TTc f3oA'i 2/✓MP
State VJM,4 FIGIZ
Day Phone
c.' Project name (if any) M A
NOTE: Permit will be issued in mme ojkmdm er(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County CAk RM&P, ET
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NE`.)J Wo(L<
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? rR I VATE
d. 'Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
SIMPL`-f P. 5M/riL 2F/^P Fog
LPUN LNIN& A GOFTw RAMP
+ PiFR �) 0 RE f IUM,4P ILY
IAIDOr) l'.on15TILOCI NN
Revived 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 50 X 2.00
b. Size of individual lot(s) (5 ,K2oo )
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 4-6 Frsrr
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
5AIJDY
e. Vegetation on tract LI&4TU`4 W o00Fb
L Man-made features now on tract W0t1J1=
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the tocat rand we ptan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
k 5IpF7JaZ L ( R-24 )
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance eerdficate, if applicable)
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? -
archaeological assessment been
Yes f No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes C No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? _ Yes 2L No
Coastal (marsh) < Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
5hu G(L1r55 U P To F114 W.
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
"/Jc o ti 5 / 7-E
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
AJO Dt5 Ct4AIL�95 14)VOVIAI
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
COUM71y t.uAVrEe- tk-=r
STTL_=i i
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-4P-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name - FLc 'Vo lltAtil
Address A1, UiC. ._J)/1ic. ✓iti0.'i
Phone `u�i- 31 � gl13q
Name /I A117.4%p YAJE5
Address o l lG/1t16 S CT
Phone u hiW &,A7'1 C—AJ U
Name Z7313
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
N av t= I<NO t,,1N
*'A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 92i day of —IekKY 19 _1
Print Name i 5p-V C L &f: Eyo
Signature Ali Lei el-04
Landowner or Author$ Agent
�vl5e p Z--1 g-`IS
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. _ Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03195

t
'Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete. all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
E)dsdng Project
Length Width Depth Death
12
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) of other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
C. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL .
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or. riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
_,Z Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water / r/X " Y ti /6 "
(2) Dimensions of fill area Z DR i VEuir
,P v i, / �� nn..an
(3) Purpose of fill
RA
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
N/A
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
/llJ 5Ti•1 /-[ I -r/r /J
c. Will wetlands be crssed in transporting equipment
to project site? _Yes Y No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
6-n6?6?L
Applicant
rd
Signature `-r
Date
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-4
STRUCTURES JA, J'2 5 1998„
(Construction within Public Trust Areas) " _ .
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major e. Mooring buoys
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
(1)
_ Commercial _Community _ Private
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
(2)
Number
this proposed project.
(3)
Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
X
(1) _ Commercial _Community Private
(2) Number
(3) Length 60 (APP 3cv',bv6Y— WAVZ)
(4)
Width of water body
(4) Width roe MAX.
(5)
Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
(5) Finger Piers —Yes _ No
shoreline
(i) Number
(ii) Length
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(iii) Width
(1)
_ Commercial _Community _ Private
(6) Platform(s) —Yes _ No
(2)
Number
(i) Number
(3)
Length
(ii) Length
(4)
Width
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
g. Other (Give complete desc7iption)
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines /S t H tT/•
(9) Width of water body APv / 07
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL 3q �t
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length _
15�t1'.�,t (-(tc:TeL—
(3) Width
Applicant or lecrName
C. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
Signature
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
Date
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
Revised 03/95

FEB 0 9 1998
,
. r, AO4►
I
o V. W16

13-192 SLOSHEETS,FILLER 55OUARE
49391 SC SHEE(S EYE EP 55DUME
l ®AlllNallana!®6renO Q.R M SHEETS EYE� S SOUARE
l 42392 IWHECYCLEO WHITE SSOUAHE
423 2W RECYCLED WHITE SSOUAHE
M.—InU S.A.
�1 rava��Ia �G i1 ? i Z.
Wo1Lo$ Qr�V5�4(lbl �1�1t+NiXa7ddd
fa��d MHW
llaa >rvoD �� fil � Sa�dv't�Irn laysdo, �. NSna9. Mv7
T� 09x9�d rt�eaxn
IJ d 14U7J O-GOM52 NdQ N91 N
1no pE inv 0z uiU ,oI , $1—
ino5s 11117 91 jnv Is I
jo eNa aV `lilyhl d-a=,k4��
3a 1L MQ'1 lv SAWX -- ------
t�� nto t��S -R h�►r►�zIC� -r t�J I dh1.
y 9 - �sI�Z� no117.a5 x Ala dV'VU -7QdO-W 3�f�1

QE�� Bey
Nlev-02•-Oi W
68421' -
ae!'nrn Prmmy
n05U
5CE
v42C, �J-u NCT/oN
} NCTE 15000 m Eocmc- :turn H., 2.
\ n mmuc, lR rtmainem n Pn.au
-a," E
- 6E2.60
lj �5!564'
I MILE r_r177
C12YSTAL
SNo1�E5.
Y I <S 15c C 15C 15 I.4^ I SC I 5 5c I 50 I W
\\v-�;
-I
45 SO c•, v' n' N EC CC #S87nx-!CE^
.m ca.v I SC<`123i" 'i " '^i�u rmanl>me mr of aroPcly '� 95 G2 •Y-:' N05.Oi-!eE
avavanon, I _ ]aa0'w Sunset Dr. . ES°.V'W a mr 9C CC = vv.M1rol iv ...
_arwres n - e 50 SY I v 50' S0 50• 16E0.16E ' 5c'e' I^50e'-� 30d W
<5' Sa `A• 5; 50• 60 SC Jul`•
_r r ao.cs `AI -O I i56""�c-i'm S6- 09-25- <
a ° P!cya
s ..necc
\ I- `lJ LJ •�iLi' .Va '..� m 0� c I19 slop 6L62' s.o le
'.� �-' N yVS By• q w
S,c �I_
r 1 \ OB /g P5 i I 'a ` •- Cln nMon.
aser mars N w 29
1'1 W 'nlg
M3. 2= 1
'•c� \Ore in." h'9 mr 1 PS. I
a O
m
mvP 9ms_0, Pq6
e52d
`��.
sd G D 1\ s m
cr, �. r I - 6urKY 10r
"tf -C) t This map was drawn from recorded information only, as
I performed PLANTATION SHCR=S ;
cn `ll si:cwn above. do field work was _

V
United States Postal Service y�ON• Nc I
Y N
Offici�l,,
1 �tL1Y ^► �R,
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE, $300
Print your name, address and ZIP Code here
ftCOC*Dff,',,.
D"*CD ' COASTAL MANACFMtl,4,
P.pyCO. BOX 27687

• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
• Complete items 3, and 4a & b.
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so
that we can return this card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the
back if space does not permit.
• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece next to
the article number.
3. Article Addressed to:
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an extra
fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
insult postmaster for fee.
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered ❑ Insured
❑ Certified ❑ COD
❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for
and fee is paid)
Form 3811YOctober 1490 \*U.S. GPO INN-27b861 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

4
•�

r�s
:i ." e • ' 'CIF" '� „u.�
-tires

a^w
a

s�+
ri
t J x
h-

� n
a

1�
;/ 11 �+ 1
V
�.
����fi�'st
w
—_
.�
a
�.,
i, '::'r
•?
r
.
t �
�A
.
���m
/.�
(ql
✓ r[i

'F
Z�, .,.'
' ..
�� �
`�is
� .. _
-�1���".
�yy.
�f
.~ ��
. y�
�Y...+.
:y
•w

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1998
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Bruce Goepel
418 Shoreline Drive
Cedar Point, NC 28584
Dear Sir:
This letter is in response to your application for permits under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) and the state dredge and fill law to develop a boat launch facility at
your property, off of Bogue Sound, in Cedar Point, on Lot 1, Sunset Drive in Plantation Shores
Subdivision. Processing of the application, which was received on March 6, 1998 and for which
notice of extended review was provided on May 30-11998, is now complete. Based on a joint state
and Federal agency, local government and public input review, the Division of Coastal
Management has made the following findings:
1) The proposed launching ramp and service pier is located on a 50 foot wide lot
boarded along the water by a 20 foot fringe of coastal marsh, inland of which is
a grove of trees with heavy understory vegetation providing excellent protection
to the adjacent Outstanding Resources Waters (ORW) from upland runoff;
2) Much of the upland vegetation, trees and understory will be removed in site pre-
paration; and the coastal marsh, approximately 200-300 sq. ft., will be impacted,
possibly removed, by construction of and subsequent shading from the elevated
ramp;
3) Water depth at the end of the proposed ramp is unsatisfactory for use during
the full tidal range. The approximately 18" depth at low tide will lead to
inadvertent "kicking" or propeller wash of the soft mud bottom in the area
immediately offshore of the ramp and marsh fringe. Staff has also determined
that the soft bottom or "muck" is approximately three feet deep at the point
where the ramp slab would be positioned and that the "muck" would not
support the slab. The placement of the ramp and subsequent launching activities
would result in the excavation and displacement of bottom sediments;
4) Coastal marsh and undisturbed shallow water habitat is a vital component
of estuarine resources base, including fish and shellfish production;
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 27611-7687 /2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE[phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 2
July 29, 1998
5) The 50 foot width of the lot is considered less than ideal for entering, turning, and
backing a vehicle and trailer with a total length of 35-45 feet. Additionally, parking
appears not to have been designated for the facility. Area residents have expressed
concern about parking taking place on the 30 foot wide subdivision road. Additionally,
the County has informed Division staff that "public use" of such project, if authorized,
would be prohibited under present zoning, etc;
6) During the course of the review, this office received objections from numerous area
citizens, including those owning property immediately adjacent the project site. The
concerns expressed by area residents are not necessarily justification for an unfavorable
action, but by law, citizen concerns must be considered. However, some of the
objections submitted to the record by the public are similar to those of Division staff
and other state agencies;
7) The Division of Marine Fisheries expressed objection to the project, as designed, due
primarily to predicted impacts to the marsh border and shallow water habitat;
8) It is noted that there are several public boat ramps in the area with the free Wildlife
Resources Commission ramp being less than 2 miles from the proposed project;
9) It is generally determined by the Division that the site selected for the launch facility
is inappropriate due to environmental impacts and use problems. The cumulative
effect of projects of this type must be considered by the Division in its decision -
making process;
10) It is the finding of the Division that the project, as proposed, is inconsistent with
the following partial listing of the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission:
a) T15A:07H.0205(c) - Management Objective (for coastal marsh). To conserve
and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, economic and aesthetic values ...., b) 0205(d) - Use Standards..... Highest
priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of existing coastal wetlands,
c) .0208(a)(2)(A) - The location, design, and need for development, as well as
construction activities involved shall be consistent with the management objective,
d) .0208(a)(2)(B) .... the permit -letting authority .... shall find that the applicant
has selected a combination of sites and design that will have a minimum adverse
impact upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal marshland.

I
Mr. Bruce Goepel
Page 3
July 29, 1998
Based on the foregoing finding, it is necessary that your application request be denied under
N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(8) which requires permit denial when a proposal is determined to be
inconsistent with the state standards or guidelines, and 113A-120(a)(10) which requires permit denial
when the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects inconsistent with the
guidelines.
If you wish to appeal this denial, you are entitled to a hearing. The hearing will involve
appearing before an Administrative Law Judge who listens to the evidence and arguments of both
parties and then makes a recommendation to the Coastal Resources Commission. Your request for
a hearing must be in the form of written petition, complying with the requirements of Chapter 150B
of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447 [phone] within 20 days from the
receipt of this letter. A copy of the petition should be filed with this office.
Also, you should be advised that as long as this state pemmt denial stands, your project must
be deemed inconsistent with the N. C. Coastal Management Program, thereby precluding issuance
of Federal permits for this project. The Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA)
gives the right to appeal this finding to the U. S. Secretary of Commerce, within 30 days of receipt
of this letter. Your appeal must be based on the grounds that the proposed activity is (1) consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the CZMA, or (2) is necessary in the interest of national security,
and thus, may be federally approved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John Parker at 919/733-
2293, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Sincerely,
Donna D. Moffitt
cc: Mr. Jeffrey Beloit, Director
OCR/NCAA
Silver Spring, MD
LTC. Terry R. Youngbluth
Corps of Engineers

Division of Coastal Management
Application Processing Notes S'
Applicant: �, ,� 60-k- NV B
Deadline: I
Date/Time: Message:
3 L'3
7—