43-13 Currituck 34 LLC

'i
-Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources
for
X Major Development in
pursuant to NCGS 113
Excavation and/or
Issued to
Authorizing development in Currituck
Causeway. Knotts Island as requested in the pe
Commission
� Area of Environmental Concern
118
pursuant to NCGS 113-229
1+/:trdtlgwfll
Permit Number
43-13
1
adi. to North Landing River, 172 Marsh
application dated 12/18/12 , including the
This permit, issued on April 11, 2013 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit autht
activities associated with the redevelopment of the
of all existing buildings and the construction of the
pond, aggregate walking trails, and swales for the
set forth in the attached permit application and woi
activities and/or construction may require a modifi
Coastal Management representative at (252) 264-3
(See attached sheets for
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
- date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2016
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
rizes the grading and other land disturbing
above referenced property including the removal
two roads and boat ramp access, stormwater fire
2 lot subdivision, all as expressly and specifically
:.plan drawing. Any additional land disturbing
:ation of this permit. Contact a Division of
)01 for this determination.
Conditions)
by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
in of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Braxton , . avis, Director
vision of Coastal Management
permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

FCurrituck 34, LLC. Permit # 43-13
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Docking Facility
2) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes only the repair of the existing docking facility
associated with the boat ramp and other structures and uses located in or over the water that are
expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other structure, whether floating or
stationary, shall become a permanent part of this docking facility without permit modification. No non -
water dependent uses of structures shall be conducted on, in or over public trust waters without permit
modification.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
3) In order to protect water quality, runoff from -construction shall not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
4) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures must be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses and property (e.g. silt fence,
diversion swales or berms, etc.).
NOTE: The Division of Land Quality approved the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for this
project under the approval # Currituck-2013-002.
Archaeological Assessment
5) Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities, the permittee shall submit two copies of an
archaeological report presenting the results of the survey of the property by Circa-CRM, LLC. The
report shall meet the standards established by the State Historic and Preservation Office and the
Secretary of the Interior. In addition, one copy of the North Carolina site form for each site or isolated
find, should be submitted with the survey report to the Office of the State Archaeology the State Historic
Preservation Office for review and comment as soon as they are available and in advance of any
construction or ground disturbance activities.
Stormwater
6) The Division of Water Quality approval of this project under stormwater management rules of the
Environmental Management Commission is covered by way of Permit No. SW7120709 issued on
10/3/12. Any violation of the permit approved by the DWQ shall be considered a violation of this
CAMA permit.
General
7) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon
due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions
caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be
made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or
alteration.

Currituck 34, LLC.
Permit # 43-13
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDYTYONS
8) No open water areas or Coastal Wetlands shall be excavated or filled.
0 This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
10) The
initiation. ee and/or his contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to project
NOTE: This permit does, not eliminate the need to i obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's, p loperty may require a 'modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at�[phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'authorizled the proposed project under COE Action Id. No:
SAW-2013-00179

}
Bowman,,►vp
C O N S U L T I N Gi FDEC 27 2012� 1
EAST POINT ESTAT.
172 Marsh Causeway (Route 61 """°"" "'y
Currituck County, North Caroliha"..F _ R
PROJECT NARRATIVE
December 18, 2012
Project Description:
The proposed project is the developme o a 22 lot subdivision ofpof Marsh Causeway in Currituck
County, North Carolina. The property tote WWres, and is zoned RR, Residential/Recreational. In
addition to the 22 lots there will be 3.10 acres of dedicated Right-of-Wa res of open space which
includes two stormwater detention ponds, walking paths, a boat rakdVand a doc a limits of
disturbance is approximately 8.4 acres. Keeping with the nature of ZUVVetoprefits in the area the
project will be designed to NCDENR's Low Density development criteria. By designing this project with
the low density criteria in mind the maximum impervious area of any lot shall not exceed 12,148 sf. The
site is in FEMA flood zones "AE" and "X".
Existing Conditions:
The lot is bound to the east by Marsh Causeway, a rural road which is one lane in each direction, and a 60
foot right of way. The site is bound to the west by the North Landing River which is a class SC body of
water, according to the NCDENR Water Quality Classifications. The property is bound to the north by a
residential subdivision and to the south by agricultural farmland.
This site was used as a mobile home or an RV park. There is a 170' long wooden pier with boat slips
located at the west of the property. There is currently on site an existing dirt road which leads to two
brick buildings at the rear of the property. The northeast corner of the property is heavily wooded. There
is an existing stormwater pond at the southeast of the property, as well as a cemetery near the center of
the lot. There is heavy vegetation along the south property line. Contours range from 5' to 12'. The high
point is at the center of the site, and the site drains down to three general areas; to the west, the north, and
the southeast. There are no public utilities along Marsh Causeway. Domestic water is provided by a well
and there is a septic sewer system to treat the sewer.
Construction Sequence:
Phase 1
1. Contractor to obtain all necessary permits prior to any construction activities.
2. Install temporary construction entrance at Marsh Causeway.
3. Install silt fence and tree protection.
4. Excavate fire pond in northeast comer of lot to act as sediment basin during construction
activities.
5. Excavate swale along the south of the site to catch sediment from construction.
6. Clear and grub trees to limits shown on plans.
7. Remove existing concrete pads and buildings.
RECEIVED
Ft_ts 1 d 2013
D :` -i!T'D C TY

Phase 2
1. Rough grade roadway.
2. Install roadway culverts.
3. Construct road and excavate roadside swales. Install aggregate walking
4. Excavate ditches in-between lots and small pond at north of the site.
5. Prepare septic field area.
6. Prepare lots for building pads.
Phase 3
1.
2.
3.
Stabilize all disturbed area resulting from construction activities related to Phases 1 and 2
Contractor to grade building pads and construct houses
Stabilize building lots
Utilities:
Waterline
Currituck County does not have any public water mains along Marsh Causeway in the area of the
proposed project. Each lot will have a private well to service each house, which shall be installed on the
lots after they have been purchased.
Since there are no water service lines, there are no fire hydrants on site, nor a feasible way to place a new
one. Therefore the proposed stormwater pond at the northeast of the site shall maintain a water surface
elevation of 4.75' to allow the Fire Department to pump water from the pond in order to fight a fire.
Sanitary Sewer
Currituck County does not have public sanitary sewer service along Marsh Causeway at the site. Each lot
will utilize a septic tank and drainfield to service the house, which shall be installed on the lots after they
have been purchased. The plans will be submitted to the Albemarle Health Department for full drainfield
design.
Stormwater:
The design standards for NCDENR's Low Density Development are being adhered to for this project.
Because this project is to be considered low density, stormwater quality does not need to be formally
addressed. Pollutants generated onsite by the limited impervious area will be treated in multiple ways.
Stormwater is required to sheet flow across lawns and open areas, instead of underground pipe networks
grass swales will be used to convey the stormwater. The sheet flow and grass channels will trap pollutants
in the grass and soil and allow for evaporation. A large majority of the front half of the site discharges
into stormwater retention ponds where the remaining pollutants have an opportunity to fall out of
suspension before being discharged to the existing roadside ditch. Stormwater from the back half of the
site will sheet flow into grass channels and ultimately outfall into the North Landing River.
The ultimate outfall for this site is the North Landing River. As stated above the low density
development criteria will be followed, therefore no curb inlets, drop inlets, or underground pipes can be
used. Stormwater from each individual lot is collected by interior lot swales that are trapezoidal in shape.
The swales have a one (1) foot flat bottom and 5:1 side slopes. Those swales discharge into lead or
llectigp swales that have a two (2) foot flat bottom and varying side slopes from 3:1 to 5:1. The lead
wales ultimately outfall into one of the two wet ponds or directly discharge into North Landing River.
C
ti
i

CAMA Improvements:
This property is on the North Landing River, which requires a 75-foot CAMA setback from the water.
There is very little disturbance within the CAMA area, and there shall be no disturbance of the North
Landing River. The site improvements within the 75-foot area include the grading of swales in between
each property to convey stormwater runoff to the adequate outfall that is the North Landing River, and a
12-foot wide stone trail which will provide access to the existing boat ramp. The majority of the
excavation for the swales will take place upland from the setback; however the side slopes will flatten
back to existing grade at or just within the CAMA setback. One tree shall be removed, which is about
180-feet from the south of the property.
Although there are two areas of impounded water on site, the proposed fire pond and the existing pond in
the southeast of the site, neither is close to the CAMA setback area, and are considered upland
development. The existing pond is located 1,080 linear feet away, and the proposed fire pond is located
1,400 linear feet away. There are existing wetlands along the top of bank of the existing pond; however
there is no filling or excavation within the wetland area. The portion of the pedestrian trail that crosses
the wetlands will be a timber bridge.
HE' 2 7 2012
RECEIVED
FED 14 2913
P •• , • /ClD C:T

7DFuEIVED
2 7 2012
COASTAL MAAAGEIN.EENT
ELIZABETH CITY

ON MP-1
APPLICATION for
i I DEC 2 7 2012 1
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. PrlmaryAppllcant/Landowner Information
Business Name
Currituck 34, Llc.
Project Name (if applicable)
East Point Estates
Applicant 1: First Name
Michael
MI
D
Last Name
Sifen
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
ff additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
500 Central Drive, Suite 106
PO Box
city
Virginia Beach
State
VA
ZIP
23454
Country
U.S.A.
Phone No.
757-486-1122
ext.
FAX No.
757-486-0905
Street Address (d different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Bowman Consulting Group
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Clayton
E
Massey
Agentl Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
Stale
1561 Bradford Road, Suite 202
Virginia Beach
VA
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
23455
757-464-0622
ext.
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
757 313 9226
N/A
Street Address (d different from above)
city
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
. _.,"D
v

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
'i E i
DEC 2 7 2012
I
i
APPLICATION for
ajor Development Permit
I Project Location
Y
'IT
County (can be multiple)
Street Address -,.;_ _.. . _._'_�_.---
State Rd. #
Currituck
172 Marsh Causeway
615
Subdivision Name
city
Stale
Zip
East Point Estates
Knott's Island(FruitvilleTownship)
NC
27950 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
757 - 486 - 1122 ext.
(Attached), I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pasquotank
North Landing River
c. Is the water body Identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
North Landing River _
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Knott's Island (Fruitville Township)
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
585.71
1,435,535
C.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
(attached), I
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
4.00 ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
There are maples, pines, cedars, and oaks on site, as well as heavy bushes in the CAMA setback, there are also Army
Corps delineated wetlands around the existing pond at the south of the site.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
A cemetery sits in the middle of the site, as well as a few 1-story brick buildings, which are to be demolished during
construction. There is an existing pier, which is approximately 170-feet long, and a teat ramp on the North Landing River.
There is also a 50-foot long dock at the northwest comer of the property, in which the damaged planking shall be repaired.
There is approximately 640-feet of bulkhead along the North Landing River.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
The property to the north is a residential subdivision and the property to the south is agricultural farmland. The property is
bound to the east by Marsh Causeway, a 604bot Right of Way and to the west by The North Landing River, a class SC
body of water according to the NCDENR Water Quality Classifications.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
RR
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
J.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? []Yes ONG
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? Circa -Cultural Resource
_
Management, LLC.
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA -
National Register listed or eligible property?
rL
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
FD EC 2 7 2012
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (I) Are there wetlands on the site? __ ... ----j I ®Yss []No
G ; IT
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ! __ _ _,� ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or III) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Currituck County does not have public sanitary sewer service along Marsh Causeway at the site. There is no existing septic
system on site.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Currituck County does not have any public water mains along Marsh Causeway in the area of the proposed project. There is
an existing tank house on site, which is to be removed during construction.
p. Describe existing slorm water management or treatment systems.
The existing site drains to 3 locations, directly into the North Landing River, into the existing pond on site, and to the ditch
along Marsh Causeway and the north of the site. The pond drains to the ditch, and the ditch makes its way to the North
Landing River, which is an adequate outfall.
& Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? DqCommercial ❑Public/Government
®Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and dairy operations of the project when complete.
The proposed use of this project is a 22 lot single family residential subdivision.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be installed first, then the fire pond and swales will be excavated with either an
excavator or a track hoe with a large bucket. The trees that are to be removed will be cleared and grubbed using a large
cutter. The concrete pads and existing buildings shall also be removed. The location of the proposed roadway shall be
rough graded using bulldozers and compactors. The subgrade shall be laid. The culverts shall then be placed and the road
pavement shall be poured. The proposed trail The roadside ditches will then be excavated, along with the swales in between
lots. The septic field area will be prepared and the building pads shall be prepared. The site is then to be stabilized.
d. List all development activities you propose.
22 lot subdivision is proposed, including 2 roadways, and a fire pond. Each lot will have its own private well and septic field.
There will be a fine aggregate path throughout the subdivision. Stormwater runoff will be collected in roadside ditches, and
shallow swales in between the lots. There will be a proposed 12-foot wide heavy duty stone paved lane to the existing boat
ramp at the northwest comer of the site, which also includes a 30-foot long hammerhead turnaround area. Each lot will be
serviced by a private well for water, and septic tank for sanitary, both of which are to be installed after a lot is purchased
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new work
I. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 8.4 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ®No []NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The stormwater runoff will discharge to the North Landing River either directly from the site, or collected in swales and the
swales will discharge to the river.
I. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes []No []NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ®Yes []No []NA -
D
__,

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
I
I
P rF 21 az
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Forr1 continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package lobe complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficien9y detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the dead (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Intracoastal Waterway Retreat Inc. (SENT AND PENDING) Phone No. 252-429-3094
Address PO Box 7141 Virginia Beach, VA 23457
Name Ogden R. Reid (SENT AND PENDING) Phone No. 914-763-5337
Address 48 Mead Street Waccabuc, NV 10597
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NCDENR Stormwster Permit SW7120709 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Cum-2013-002
October 3, 2012 October 9, 2012 CAMA _ r
Ptrmi 11 4ct-gq
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), If necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
r�-
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. .r.)
u1
Date 12-18-12 Print Name'
w
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts

• Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
ODCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
R rc ��- r", --1)
Y

Form DCM MP-3 JAN 4 2013
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities) ;.,
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures
proposed.
22 Lots
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
22 residential units; 0.67 units/ AC
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(i) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
®Yes []No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: October 9, 2012
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking.
2.1 %
i. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by impervious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking. 9,R bbS SF R A R
24%L--ra%'A
at u�m f liy C�,nlapt�%�
j. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal. 03S Awcs
Each lot will have a private septic tank, which is to be
installed after a lot is purchased.
I. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g., surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down' and residential discharges).
Runoff collects in trapezoidal swales on the lot lines directly
discharge to the North Landing River. Also, stormater
runoff collects in ditched along the proposed roadway
and drains to the proposed pond in the northeast of the
site or the existing pond in the southeast of the site.
Runoff also collects in swales along Marsh Causeway
and the north of the site and discharges to the North
b. Number of lots or parcels.
22
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
8.4 AC
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
Stone paving, asphalt path, asphalt road
h, Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stormwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: October 3, 2012
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
®Yes []No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative 4rmwater
design?
[]Yes ®No []NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
252.808-28082 :: 1.888-4RCOAST:: www.necoastaimanaaement.net revised: 12/26/06

eorttt DCM MP-3 (upland Development, Page 2 of 2 f
Landing River.
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g., well,
community, public system, etc.)
Each lot will have a private well, which is to be installed
after a lot is purchased.
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
Preliminary Plat submitted on October 22, 2012
December 18, 2012
Date
East Point Estates
Project Name
Michael D. Sifen
Applicant Name
Appllcant Signature
n. (1) Will water be impounded? ®Yes ®No []NA
(if) If yes, how many acres? 0.75 acres in proposed fire pond,
located 1,400 LF upland from CAMA setback area and
0.24 acres in existing pond on site, (coated 1,080 LF
upland from CAMA setback area.
p. If proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
installed for this upland development?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
RECEIVED
FFn 1 2 � nQ
n`A. _ DCIT.Y
J6

LOT SUMMARY TABLE W/D
NO.
TOTAL AC.
WIDTH
DEPTH
RATIO
LOT DESC.
1
0.94
150.66'
401.69'
2.67:1
Cul-de-sac lot
2
0.93
126.43'
431.52;
3.41:1
Lot
3
1.28
125.87'
436.35'
3.47:1
Lot
4
1.13
134.03'
392.60'
2.93:1
Lot
5
1.03
53.41'
405.80'
7.60:1
Cul-de-sac lot
6
0.97
66.07'
152.56'
2.31:1
Cul-de-sac lot
7
0.93
126.41'
347.92'
2.75:1
Corner Lot
8
1.00
125.00'
347.40,
2.78:1
Lot
9
1.01
125.47'
349.66'
2.80:1
Lot
10
1.03
125.06'
364.05'
2.91:1
Lot
11
1.10
128.77'
392.33'
3.05:1
Lot
12
1.02
125.53'
319.86'
2.55:1
Corner Lot
13
0.96
169.00'
303.40'
1.80:1
Lot
14
0.96
176.67'
311.17'
1.76:1
Lot
15
1.00
129.71'
315.43'
2.43:1
Lot
16
1.10
125.00'
315.77'
2.53:1
Lot
17
1.10
125.00'
315.77'
2.53:1
Lot
18
0.92
150.68'
347.01'
2.30:1
Lot
19
0.94
150.68'
357.83'
2.38:1
Lot
20
0.92
126.76'
363.40
2.87:1
Lot
21
0.92
235.25'
171.62'
1.55:1
Corner Lot
*22
0.92
158.42'
244.01'
1.54:1
Cul-de-sac lot
TOTAL LOTS: 22

DCM Coordinator: - C�ivw Permit #: q3 i3
Mg7
AILIING DISTRIBUTION SHEET
Permitee: / /. A� . Sir GEC J
Agents
DCM Field Offices
Elizabeth City �� (with revised work plan drawings)
Morehead City
Washington
Wilmington
US ACOE Offices:
Washington: Raleigh Bland
Tracey Wheeler
William Westcott (NC DOT)
Bill Biddlecome (NC DOT)
Wilmington: Dave Timpy
Cultural Resources: Renee Gledhill -Early
Public Water Supply: Debra Benoy (WIRO)
Joey White (WARO)
Marine Fisheries: Anne Deaton
Jeannie Hardy
NC DOT: Ken Pace Y
Shellfish Sanitation: Patti Fowler i'
State Property: Tim Walton -�'
Water Quality: Karen Higgins (Raleigh)
John Hennessy (NC DOT)
Washington: Anthony Scarbraugh-401
Scott Vinson-Stormwater
Wilmington: Joanne Steenhuis - 401
Chad Coburn - 401
Linda Lewis - Stormwater
Wildlife Resources: Maria Dunn (WARD)
Vacant (WIRO)
LPO:
Fax Distribution: Permitee #:
Agent #:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal) Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. DaI vis
Governor Director
I
April 11, 2013i-
Currituck 34, LLC
500 Central Drive, Suite 106
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Dear Sir or Madam:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where applicable, the
State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff -colored form) is retained by.
you and it must be available on site when the project is inspectedlfor compliance. Please sign both the original and the
copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed envelope. Signing the permit and proceeding means you have
waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you i
113-229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
of this decision on your permit. You should also be aware that if
issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days, the matter must I
Resources Commission makes the final decision on any appeal.
ay request a hearing pursuant to NCGS 113A-121.1 or
rith NCGS Chapter 150B with the Office of
27611-6714, [phone] within twenty (20) days
iother qualified party submits a valid objection to the
resolved prior to work initiation. The Coastal
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work must be carried
out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future maintenance requires additional
approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review all project plans, as approved. If you are
having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to be sure that he fully understands all permit
requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we request that you
complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if questions arise concerning permit
conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact Department personnel at any time for assistance.
By working in accordance with the permit, you will be helping to drotect our vitally important coastal resources.
ouicerer
i
. 7�.
Douglas
Major Pt
Enclosure
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX:[phone] Internet:
Huggett
its and Consistency Manager
An Equal eppolumty IArfimiagve kllon Employer

I I
IOUDoc ID: nWQtllDn'MF"~.'��_a._.,.,.
r % Recorded• SO%i1 T210003 too: CAp
Fes Nnt, i28 420.00 pege 1 02
{ g
ExeSae Tex: �4,400,pb RECEIVED
x1�ASFF,�TA7CAMO Currltuok County, NC i
`t \,NT
D °�� BCfOR - _ Charlene Y po:,dy Ro� tir o
1 '•., BK969 D�8 .� 5
T�s�ueaor Cettdation'mat No neuny"ent Taxes DEC 2 7 2012
'ti r7ieDua,Date
expueslan,'Ahoft 1W YY_:Certifiration
Y oumg certification data NORTH CAROLINA EXCISE STAMPS
% /'•, COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ATTACHED AND CANCELLED ELIZABETHCITY
Mall after rkcordipg to Brumsey and Brumsey, PLLC PO Box 1b0;'�Xizattu�C 27929
Preg`ared by- &ichard D. Allred, Esq. Consideration: $2; 2b0,.000-�80
301 Cleveland Place, #I03
ViX944a beach, VA 23462 File no. 06 B 37323
(957)22B-574$
f ,
w i DUD OF BARGAIN AND SALE
r
THIS DEEP OF BARGAT� LD 2ALS•, [Wade this Sth day of October,
2006, by and 6tween SABTIST,CpUNbIL OF NORFOLK, (a/k/a Baptist
Council of Norfoi knc.) a Virgiq a'Vn-profit corporation (the
"GRANTOR"); and cmatiwm 34, L.7, .C.,.a Virginia limited liability
.c
company (the "MmrTHis), whose,. add4sp ids Currituck 34, L.L.C.,
c/o Michael D. Sifen, '4nc.-, Atin: AtcgYntiiN Dept., 500 Central
Drive, Suite 106 Vi % � 1
rginia'-Beath, Virginia'.23454.
That for and in consi+deratiain"o$ t'hs -sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00), cash in hand pAd, ;and • other' good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency 'amh ,receia of which are hereby
acknowledged, the GRANTOR does 14reby grant and convey, with
General Warranty and English Covenants of Titled unto ti}e, GRANTEE
the following described property, to wit!
That certain tract of land situate on the West bids of.06ia.ro4
running from Creeds to Knotts •Island, contA.ining..32:-65 'acre more or
less, located on what is generally known as.,MorseLz Poi,iit, bounded on
the East by said Knotts Island Road, on the South 4nd,East byf the
lands now or formerly belonging to Ogden Reed,%-gn;theiwest by
Currituck Sound, and on the North by land. now or ffgamerly belonging
to John King, together with all riparian rights in Currituck SounBx
shown upon a certain plat or survey thereof titled "Plat of apart hf
Cason Farm, Currituck County, North Carolina", prepared Vy S.'uLttt.
Page 1 of 3
�, , r

IV
p14t or survey is hereby attached and made a part of this deed. This
is'a part of the same property which was devised to Annie L. Heistand
by Wfll of J. C. Cason, deceased, of record in Will Book 6 at page
537,,at seq in the Clerks Office of the Superior Court of Currituck
G6unty of North Carolina, and which. upon the death of said Annie L.
Aeistand on February 11, 1941, descended to her niece and nephew,
:Bessie S. Gibney and Robert B. Stevens, as her sole and only heirs
aA law.
\ There'as excepted from this conveyance the cemetery site situated
It" rtn said tract of land as shown or. the above mentioned plat. And
by acGQptance of this deed grantee, its successors and assigns,
ccvenanti`,that it will provide perpetual care for said cemetery
i and keep s*e clean and clear of weeds and other obnoxious matter.
BEdNGithe some property conveyed to Baptist Council of Norfolk, a
Vrgibia cq'rporation, by Deed, dated November 28, 1960, from Bessie
t W. Gibney ,And Frederick A. Gibney, husband and wife, William F.
4Jfaaker, if., kaing as guardian of Robert B. Stevens, and Verna
Creech Str2vns, wife of Robert B. Stevens, and recorded in Deed Book
95, at Pagd 133 in•'�he Clerk's Office of the Superior Court of
CuVrituEk;County,, North Carolina.
This-veyanco is-madq-aagpressly subject to the conditions,
restrictions,' reaerstatio;a and a"ements of record in the chain of
title, if any, db61stit4ing cdnstxuctive notice, which have not
r
expired by any�•.,time,lii itatiog gained therein or otherwise
become ineffective. i V
WITNESS the following 49;x atvreo 'land,, seals:
BAPTIST cou;g ll,'OF NORFOLK, INC.
(SFvAL)
Mich ` K4^Im er al, President
5
ATTEST: `
T�fi 1
(SEAL) Ir,./
P�iy s H. Sawyer, Pcretary '
Page 2 of,.3 I f
i:E��;Ji:`1 I• I � yJ
t
'
_r `r
• I
v
r
I
t

1
CITY O'E VIRGINIA BEACH, to wit:
•i ,
' I,`•Zichard D. Allred, a Notary Public in and for the City and
State aforesaid, do hereby certify Michael K. Imperial, President
of! Baptist Council of Norfolk (a/k/a Baptist Council of Norfolk,
Ific-P a Virginia corporation, and Phyllis H. Sawyer, Secretary of
gorfblk Baptist Council, whose names are signed to the foregoing
instrWent, bearing date on the 5th day of October, 2006, have
ac)�ndwfbdged the same before me in my City and State aforesaid.
1
\• �,% ;'GIVEN; under my hand and seal this 5th day of October, 2006.
qii
'•• :�• � I Notary Public • �� wF�r ®=;
My\codmi.jssion:expires: October 31, 2007. - •u OF =
''h{RY PU�4
•' ; I i % • ` Iry,b/111111011N
1 1 -•
It I
% 1
i • 1 ,
't:• I 1 1
1
i 5
y; RECzWED
r . '
Page 3 of 3
I
1 1 i
•� vI i �`
r
j
1 l:
• � 1 1
, 1
� 1
` 1,

4
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 172 Marsh Causeway (NC HWY 615), Knotts Island,
Currituck County, adjacent to North Landing River.
Photo Index —
2006: 198-7031 (M-R 8-11) 2000: 200-2391 (O-T 16-21) 1995: 198-2084 (N-T 18-21)
1989: 1 34-9 (G-M 6-10) 1984: 132-655 (D-I 3-6) 1978: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2879498 Y: 1030246
Lat/Long: 36.54408640-76.00606200 Quadrangle: Creeds, NC, L.R.
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 1/10/2013
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete — 1/7/2013
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Currituck County
Land Classification from LUP - Limited Service and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES
(C) WaterrUse-.-re`nrivate
tNo
(D) Inte dresidential lots upon completion(E) Wasteatment: Existing - None
Planned - None, (futureseptic.swe4er lot when sold)
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — Cemetery, several buildings, cement pad,
gazebo, pavilions, gravel path/road, boat
ramp, bulkhead, docking facility, bulkhead,
low retaining wall
Planned - fire ponds, swales, roadways, road to access
boat ramp, walking trails
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Estuarine Shoreline AEC
±2,300 ft2 disturbed
(B) Upland Area
±363,604 ft2 disturbed
(C) 404 Wetlands
±336 ft2 shaded

n
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 2
(D)
(E)
(F)
Total Area Disturbed: ±366,240 ft'
Primary Nursery Area: No
Water Classification: SC Open to Shellfishing: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to subdivide a large parcel into a 22
lot subdivision, remove all existing building structures, construct two roads to access
the lots, construct a roadway to access an existing boat ramp, create a stormwater
fire pond in addition to an existing stormwater pond, install aggregate walking trails,
dig swales for drainage and repair an existing dock along the boat ramp.
Project Setting
The site of the proposed development is a large parcel that was formerly known as the Anchor
Campground. It is located at 172 Marsh Causeway (NC HWY 615), approximately 0.4 miles
south of the NC/VA border on Knotts Island, Currituck County, and is adjacent to North Landing
River.
The property is ±33 acres in size with elevations that range from 12' above Normal Water Level
(NWL) at the center of the site, gradually tapering down to 5' within three general areas; to the
north, the southeast, and to west along North Landing River. Man-made features on the
property within the upland areas include an old cemetery, several buildings in disrepair, a large
cement pad, a gazebo, a large picnic pavilion, several small picnic pavilions, and a grown over
gravel access road/path. The tract is vegetated with yard grasses, various upland trees and
shrubs. The majority of the site is open field with the exception of a ±2 acre densely wooded
area within the northeast section of the property and a ±0.22 acre stormwater pond located
within the southeast section of the property. Approximately 0.21 acres surrounding the pond
has been delineated as a jurisdictional 404-wetland by the USACE. According to the USDA's
Natural Resources Conservation Service's Web Soil Survey, the soil on the property is made
up of Bojac loamy sand (BoA) and Tomotley fine sandy loam (To).
An archaeological assessment was conducted on this site in the spring of 2012 by Circa —
Cultural Resource Management, LLC which resulted in the identification of three isolated finds,
no new archaeological sites, and one ca. 1980's architectural resource. It was recommended
that no further work be conducted for the three isolated finds or the location as they are not
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Previously identified
archaeological sites within 1 mile of the project area include 31CK67 and 31CK198.
The site has ±585' of shoreline that has been hardened by a wooden bulkhead located at
normal water level. This bulkhead ties into the adjacent property bulkhead to the north and has
a return along the southern property line that is reinforced with large concrete riprap. A 14' wide
concrete boat ramp is located adjacent to the northern property line. The ramp has a 50'x6' pier
located on the southern side that is missing most of its decking and has damage to several
joists and girders. The damage to this pier is less than 50% of the structural components.
Approximately 320' south of the boat ramp is a docking facility comprising of a 150'x6pierwith
a 16'x16' platform. Three 24'x3' finger piers are located on the south side of the pier creating
four slips. A short retaining wall that ranges from 6 inches to 1 foot in height runs parallel with
the shoreline ±15' landward of the bulkhead. All of these structures were permitted through

4
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 3
RE'L;En
CAMA Major Permit #49-99. The waters of North Landing River in this area are classified as
SC and are closed to shellfish taking. 11
The adjacent property to the north is a large parcel that contains the Sandy Point Resort
camping area as well as full time residences. The shoreline of this property has been hardened
through bulkheading and riprap and a docking facility exists. The adjacent property to the south
has a natural shoreline and is also a large parcel containing the Flyway Club hunting lodge.
The lodge and barn are located near the shoreline and the upland areas are agricultural fields.
Development Proposal
The applicant proposes to develop the site by creating 22 single-family lots (6 being waterfront)
with a minimum lot size of 40,002 sf (0.918 acres). Twenty-four foot wide asphalt roads are
proposed within the subdivision as well as two 96' diameter cul-de-sacs. There will be two open
space areas within the highground area as well as a water access open space area. Within the
water access area, a 12' wide heavy duty stone road with a 30' long hammer head turn around
will be constructed to the existing boat ramp from a proposed cul-de-sac. The existing
damaged pier along the boat ramp will have the decking and joists/girders repla��rr
-to-br rng it to usable condition. A 5' wide asphalt walking trail is proposed within the open space
_areagTheirail will c_r6ss-VwoU-gh a portion of the delineated 404-wetlands and within this area
it will transition to a t83'x4' timber boardwalk that will be elevated 1' as measured from the
wetland substrate to the bottom of the decking.
Within the highground area, all of the existing structures with the exception of the cemetery will
be removed. The wooded area within the northeast section will be cleared and a 0.75 acre
stormwater/fire pond will be excavated. Drainage swales will be dug along the roadways and in
between the proposed lots. The majority of stormwater will flow into the excavated stormwater
pond, into the existing ditches along Marsh Causeway or into the existing stormwater pond.
The sound front lots will have six swales that will extend into the 75' Coastal Shoreline of
Environmental Concern (AEC) and of these six, three will extend into the 30'CAMA buffer.
These swales will terminate and stormwater will sheet flow over the bulkhead into the North
Landing River.
The total disturbance on the site will be t8.4 acres. The total amount of proposed impervious
coverage for the site is ±88,665 ft2 or 6.2% including the roadways and walking trails. In order
to be considered a low density subdivision, future total impervious coverage for the tract will not
exceed 24%. As proposed, the amount of impervious coverage within the CAMA 75' AEC is
±950 ft2 or 2.1 %.
Each lot will have the building pad area graded in preparation for future home construction.
Each lot, when sold, will have individual wells and septic systems installed; however, a t0.61
acre reserve septic field area will be prepared within the northern open area under this
application.
The NC Division of Water Quality issued Stormwater Permit #SW120709 on October 3, 2012
and The NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources issued an Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan #Curri-2013-002 on October 9, 2012 for this project.

11
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 4
Anticipated Impacts
The construction of the drainage swales will result in ±1,700 ft2 of disturbance within the
Estuarine Shoreline AEC.
The construction of the boat ramp access road will result in the additional ±600 ft2 for a total
of 2.1% of impervious surface within the Estuarine Shoreline AEC.
• The boardwalk installation will result in the shading of ±336 ft2 of 404-wetlands.
The proposed development will result in the disturbance of ±8.4 acres on the tract.
Submitted by: Ron Renaldi
Date: 01 /16/2013

r
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 172 Marsh Causeway (NC HWY 615), Knotts Island,
Currituck County, adjacent to North Landing River,
Photo Index —
2006: 198-7031 (M-R 8-11) 2000: 200-2391 (O-T 16-21) 1995: 198-2084 (N-T 18-21)
1989: 1 34-9 (G-M 6-10) 1984: 132-655 (D-1 3-6) 1978: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2879498 Y: 1030246
Lat/Long: 36.54408640-76.00606200 Quadrangle: Creeds, NC, L.R.
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 1/10/2013
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete — 1/7/2013
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Currituck County
Land Classification from LUP - Limited Service and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES
(C) Water Dependent: No
(D) Intended Use: Private residential lots upon completion
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - None, (future septic system per lot when sold)
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — Cemetery, several buildings, cement pad,
gazebo, pavilions, gravel path/road, boat
ramp, bulkhead, docking facility, bulkhead,
low retaining wall
Planned - fire ponds, swales, roadways, road to access
boat ramp, walking trails
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FII I FD nTHFR
(A) Estuarine Shoreline AEC
±2,300 ft2 disturbed
(B) Upland Area
±363,604 ft2 disturbed
(C) 404 Wetlands
±336 ft2 shaded

M
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 2
(D)
(E)
(F)
Total Area Disturbed: ±366,240 ft2
Primary Nursery Area: No
RECEIVED
lAN 2 2 1,011
Water Classification: SC Open to Shell i (1bNgy
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to subdivide a large parcel into a 22
lot subdivision, remove all existing building structures, construct two roads to access
the lots, construct a roadway to access an existing boat ramp, create a stormwater
fire pond in addition to an existing stormwater pond, install aggregate walking trails,
dig swales for drainage and repair an existing dock along the boat ramp.
Project Setting
The site of the proposed development is a large parcel that was formerly known as the Anchor
Campground. It is located at 172 Marsh Causeway (NC HWY 615), approximately 0.4 miles
south of the NCNA border on Knotts Island, Currituck County, and is adjacent to North Landing
River.
The property is ±33 acres in size with elevations that range from 12' above Normal Water Level
(NWL) at the center of the site, gradually tapering down to 5' within three general areas; to the
north, the southeast, and to west along North Landing River. Man-made features on the
property within the upland areas include an old cemetery, several buildings in disrepair, a large
cement pad, a gazebo, a large picnic pavilion, several small picnic pavilions, and a grown over
gravel access road/path. The tract is vegetated with yard grasses, various upland trees and
shrubs. The majority of the site is open field with the exception of a ±2 acre densely wooded
area within the northeast section of the property and a ±0.22 acre stormwater pond located
within the southeast section of the property. Approximately 0.21 acres surrounding the pond
has been delineated as a jurisdictional 404-wetland by the USACE. According to the USDA's
Natural Resources Conservation Service's Web Soil Survey, the soil on the property is made
up of Bojac loamy sand (BoA) and Tomotley fine sandy loam (To).
An archaeological assessment was conducted on this site in the spring of 2012 by Circa -
Cultural Resource Management, LLC which resulted in the identification of three isolated finds,
no new archaeological sites, and one ca. 1980's architectural resource. It was recommended
that no further work be conducted for the three isolated finds or the location as they are not
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Previously identified
archaeological sites within 1 mile of the project area include 31 CK67 and 31 CK198.
The site has ±585' of shoreline that has been hardened by a wooden bulkhead located at
normal water level. This bulkhead ties into the adjacent property bulkhead to the north and has
a return along the southern property line that is reinforced with large concrete riprap. A 14' wide
concrete boat ramp is located adjacent to the northern property line. The ramp has a 50'x6' pier
located on the southern side that is missing most of its decking and has damage to several
joists and girders. The damage to this pier is less than 50% of the structural components.
Approximately 320' south of the boat ramp is a docking facility comprising of a 150'x6' pierwith
a 16'x16' platform. Three 24'x3' finger piers are located on the south side of the pier creating
four slips. A short retaining wall that ranges from 6 inches to 1 foot in height runs parallel with
the shoreline ±15' landward of the bulkhead. All of these structures were permitted through

4
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 3
RECEIVED
1/\ \ 2 2 2011
CAMA Major Permit #49-99. The waters of North Landing River in this area are classified as
SC and are closed to shellfish taking.
The adjacent property to the north is a large parcel that contains the Sandy Point Resort
camping area as well as full time residences. The shoreline of this property has been hardened
through bulkheading and riprap and a docking facility exists. The adjacent property to the south
has a natural shoreline and is also a large parcel containing the Flyway Club hunting lodge.
The lodge and barn are located near the shoreline and the upland areas are agricultural fields.
Development Proposal
The applicant proposes to develop the site by creating 22 single-family lots (6 being water front)
with a minimum lot size of 40,002 sf (0.918 acres). Twenty-four foot wide asphalt roads are
proposed within the subdivision as well as two 96' diameter cul-de-sacs. There will be two open
space areas within the highground area as well as a water access open space area. Within the
water access area, a 12' wide heavy duty stone road with a 30' long hammer head turn around
will be constructed to the existing boat ramp from a proposed cul-de-sac. The existing
damaged pier along the boat ramp will have the decking and joists/girders replaced as needed
to bring it to usable condition. A 5' wide asphalt walking trail is proposed within the open space
areas. The trail will cross through a portion of the delineated 404-wetlands and within this area
it will transition to a ±83'x4' timber boardwalk that will be elevated 1' as measured from the
wetland substrate to the bottom of the decking.
Within the highground area, all of the existing structures with the exception of the cemetery will
be removed. The wooded area within the northeast section will be cleared and a 0.75 acre
stormwater/fire pond will be excavated. Drainage swales will be dug along the roadways and in
between the proposed lots. The majority of stormwater will flow into the excavated stormwater
pond, into the existing ditches along Marsh Causeway or into the existing stormwater pond.
The sound front lots will have six swales that will extend into the 75' Coastal Shoreline of
Environmental Concern (AEC) and of these six, three will extend into the 30'CAMA buffer.
These swales will terminate and stormwater will sheet flow over the bulkhead into the North
Landing River.
The total disturbance on the site will be ±8.4 acres. The total amount of proposed impervious
coverage for the site is ±88,665 ftz or 6.2% including the roadways and walking trails. In order
to be considered a low density subdivision, future total impervious coverage forthe tract will not
exceed 24%. As proposed, the amount of impervious coverage within the CAMA 75' AEC is
±950 ft2 or 2.1 %.
Each lot will have the building pad area graded in preparation for future home construction.
Each lot, when sold, will have individual wells and septic systems installed; however, a ±0.61
acre reserve septic field area will be prepared within the northern open area under this
application.
The NC Division of Water Quality issued Stormwater Permit #SW120709 on October 3, 2012
and The NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources issued an Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan #Curri-2013-002 on October 9, 2012 for this project.

to
Currituck 34, LLC c/o Michael Sifen
Field Investigation Report
Page 4
Anticipated Impacts
The construction of the drainage swales will result in ±1,700 ft2 of disturbance within the
Estuarine Shoreline AEC.
The construction of the boat ramp access road will result in the additional ±600 ft2 for a total
of 2.1 % of impervious surface within the Estuarine Shoreline AEC.
• The boardwalk installation will result in the shading of ±336 ft2 of 404-wetlands.
The proposed development will result in the disturbance of ±8.4 acres on the tract.
Submitted by: Ron Renaldi
Date: 01 /16/2013
RBCEral)
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY

Bowman
C O N S U L T I N Gf
EAST POINT ESTA
RECElVE'D
DEC 2 7 2012
�Lm��ir
172 Marsh Causeway (Route 615 ,
Currituck County, North Caroliha
PROJECT NARRATIVE
December 18, 2012
Project Description:
The proposed project is the development of a 22 lot subdivision off of Marsh Causeway in Currituck
County, North Carolina. The property totals 32.96 acres, and is zoned RR, Residential/Recreational. In
addition to the 22 lots there will be 3.10 acres of dedicated Right -of -Way, 6.38 acres of open space which
includes two stormwater detention ponds, walking paths, a boat ramp and a dock. The limits of
disturbance is approximately 8.4 acres. Keeping with the nature of the developments in the area the
project will be designed to NCDENR's Low Density development criteria. By designing this project with
the low density criteria in mind the maximum impervious area of any lot shall not exceed 12,148 sf. The
site is in FEMA flood zones "AE" and "X".
Existine Conditions:
The lot is bound to the east by Marsh Causeway, a rural road which is one lane in each direction, and a 60
foot right of way. The site is bound to the west by the North Landing River which is a class SC body of
water, according to the NCDENR Water Quality Classifications. The property is bound to the north by a
residential subdivision and to the south by agricultural farmland.
This site was used as a mobile home or an RV park. There is a 170' long wooden pier with boat slips
located at the west of the property. There is currently on site an existing dirt road which leads to two
brick buildings at the rear of the property. The northeast comer of the property is heavily wooded. There
is an existing stormwater pond at the southeast of the property, as well as a cemetery near the center of
the lot. There is heavy vegetation along the south property line. Contours range from 5' to 12'. The high
point is at the center of the site, and the site drains down to three general areas; to the west, the north, and
the southeast. There are no public utilities along Marsh Causeway. Domestic water is provided by a well
and there is a septic sewer system to treat the sewer.
Construction Sequence:
Phase 1
1. Contractor to obtain all necessary permits prior to any construction activities.
2. Install temporary construction entrance at Marsh Causeway.
3. Install silt fence and tree protection.
4. Excavate fire pond in northeast comer of lot to act as sediment basin during construction
activities.
5. Excavate swale along the south of the site to catch sediment from construction.
6. Clear and grub trees to limits shown on plans.
7. Remove existing concrete pads and buildings.
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
I)CA,f-�!H, CITY

Phase 2
1. Rough grade roadway.
2. Install roadway culverts.
3. Construct road and excavate roadside swales. Install aggregate walking pat s,
4. Excavate ditches in-between lots and small pond at north of the site.
5. Prepare septic field area.
6. Prepare lots for building pads.
Phase 3
1. Stabilize all disturbed area resulting from construction activities related to Phases 1 and 2
2. Contractor to grade building pads and construct houses
3. Stabilize building lots
Utilities:
Waterline
Currituck County does not have any public water mains along Marsh Causeway in the area of the
proposed project. Each lot will have a private well to service each house, which shall be installed on the
lots after they have been purchased.
Since there are no water service lines, there are no fire hydrants on site, nor a feasible way to place a new
one. Therefore the proposed stormwater pond at the northeast of the site shall maintain a water surface
elevation of 4.75' to allow the Fire Department to pump water from the pond in order to fight a fire.
Sanitary Sewer
Currituck County does not have public sanitary sewer service along Marsh Causeway at the site. Each lot
will utilize a septic tank and drainfield to service the house, which shall be installed on the lots after they
have been purchased. The plans will be submitted to the Albemarle Health Department for full drainfield
design.
Stormwater:
The design standards for NCDENR's Low Density Development are being adhered to for this project.
Because this project is to be considered low density, stormwater quality does not need to be formally
addressed. Pollutants generated onsite by the limited impervious area will be treated in multiple ways.
Stormwater is required to sheet flow across lawns and open areas, instead of underground pipe networks
grass swales will be used to convey the stormwater. The sheet flow and grass channels will trap pollutants
in the grass and soil and allow for evaporation. A large majority of the front half of the site discharges
into stormwater retention ponds where the remaining pollutants have an opportunity to fall out of
suspension before being discharged to the existing roadside ditch. Stormwater from the back half of the
site will sheet flow into grass channels and ultimately outfall into the North Landing River.
The ultimate outfall for this site is the North Landing River. As stated above the low density
development criteria will be followed, therefore no curb inlets, drop inlets, or underground pipes can be
used. Stormwater from each individual lot is collected by interior lot swales that are trapezoidal in shape.
The swales have a one (1) foot flat bottom and 5:1 side slopes. Those swales discharge into lead or
collection swales that have a two (2) foot flat bottom and varying side slopes from 3:1 to 5:1. The lead
swales ultimately outfall into on "o wet ponds or directly discharge into North Landing River
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY

CAMA Improvements:
This property is on the North Landing River, which requires a 75-foot CAMA setback from the water.
There is very little disturbance within the CAMA area, and there shall be no disturbance of the North
Landing River. The site improvements within the 75-foot area include the grading of swales in between
each property to convey stormwater runoff to the adequate outfall that is the North Landing River, and a
12-foot wide stone trail which will provide access to the existing boat ramp. The majority of the
excavation for the swales will take place upland from the setback; however the side slopes will flatten
back to existing grade at or just within the CAMA setback. One tree shall be removed, which is about
180-feet from the south of the property.
Although there are two areas of impounded water on site, the proposed fire pond and the existing pond in
the southeast of the site, neither is close to the CAMA setback area, and are considered upland
development. The existing pond is located 1,080 linear feet away, and the proposed fire pond is located
1,400 linear feet away. There are existing wetlands along the top of bank of the existing pond; however
there is no filling or excavation within the wetland area. The portion of the pedestrian trail that crosses
the wetlands will be a timber bridge.
lac': 2 7 2012
Iu
t v
RECEMD
. '� 2 2 2013
DCM-MFID CITY

RL -JYED
DEC 2 7 2012
COASTAL MANAG=Iv;ENT
ELIZF,B,=H CITY
RECEWED
_FAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY

DO MP-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Currituck 34, Llc.
Project Name (if applicable)
East Point Estates
Applicant 1: First Name
Michael
MI
D
Last Name
Sifen
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
500 Central Drive, Suite 106
PO Box
City
Virginia Beach
State
VA
ZIP
23454
Country
U.S.A.
Phone No.
757-486-1122
ext.
FAX No.
757-486-0905
Street Address (d different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Bowman Consulting Group
Agentl Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Clayton
E
Massey
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
city
State
1561 Bradford Road, Suite 202
Virginia Beach
VA
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
23455
757-464-0622 ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
757 313 9226
N/A
Street Address (Ifdil/erent from above)
city
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
x>;t;Elyt;u
11AN G„
2 "`1&-iI-fD ^;TY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
DEC 2 7 2012
I
' APPLICATION for
I�Aajor Development Permit
3. Project LocationEll
—
—
County (can be multiple)
Street Address �_._..:__.r�
State Rd. #
Currituck
172 Marsh Causeway -
615
Subdivision Name
city
Stale
Zip"
East Point Estates
Knott's Island(FruitvilleTownship)
NC
27950 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
757 - 486 - 1122 ext.
(Attached), I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pasquotank
North Landing River
c. Is the water body Identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
North Landing River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Knott's Island (Fruitville Township)
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
585.71
1,435,535
c.
Size of individual lolls)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
(attached), I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
4.00 ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
There are maples, pines, cedars, and oaks on site, as well as heavy bushes in the CAMA setback, there are also Army
Corps delineated wetlands around the existing pond at the south of the site.
I.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
A cemetery sits in the middle of the site, as well as a few 1-story brick buildings, which are to be demolished during
construction. There is an existing pier, which is approximately 170-feet long, and a boat ramp on the North Landing River.
There is also a 50-foot long dock at the northwest comer of the property, in which the damaged planking shall be repaired.
There is approximately 640-feet of bulkhead along the North Landing River.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
The property to the north is a residential subdivision and the property to the south is agricultural farmland. The property is
bound to the east by Marsh Causeway, a 60-foot Right of Way and to the west by The North Landing River, a class SC
body of water according to the NCDENR Water Quality Classifications.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
RR
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? Circa —Cultural Resource
Management, LLC.
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property? RECEIVED
46rn3 %aF "es on next page>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
DEC 2 7 2012 I I
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? - _ _ ®Yes []No
(it) Are there coastal wetlands ❑Yes ®No
(Ili) If yes to either (i) or (it) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Currituck County does not have public sanitary sewer service along Marsh Causeway at the site. There is no existing septic
system on site.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Currituck County does not have any public water mains along Marsh Causeway in the area of the proposed project. There is
an existing tank house on site, which is to be removed during construction.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
The existing site drains to 3 locations, directly into the North Landing River, into the existing pond on site, and to the ditch
along Marsh Causeway and the north of the site. The pond drains to the ditch, and the ditch makes its way to the North
Landing River, which is an adequate outfall.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ORCommercial ❑Public/Government
®PrivatelCommunity
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The proposed use of this project is a 22 lot single family residential subdivision.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be installed first, then the fire pond and swales will be excavated with either an
excavator or a track hoe with a large bucket. The trees that are to be removed will be cleared and grubbed using a large
cutter. The concrete pads and existing buildings shall also be removed. The location of the proposed roadway shall be
rough graded using bulldozers and compactors. The subgrade shall be laid. The culverts shall then be placed and the road
pavement shall be poured. The proposed trail The roadside ditches will then be excavated, along with the swales in between
lots. The septic field area will be prepared and the building pads shall be prepared. The site is then to be stabilized.
d. List all development activities you propose.
22 lot subdivision is proposed, including 2 roadways, and a fire pond. Each lot will have its own private well and septic field.
There will be a fine aggregate path throughout the subdivision. Stormwater runoff will be collected in roadside ditches, and
shallow swales in between the lots. There will be a proposed 12-foot wide heavy duty stone paved lane to the existing boat
ramp at the northwest comer of the site, which also includes a 30-foot long hammerhead turnaround area. Each lot will be
serviced by a private well for water, and septic tank for sanitary, both of which are to be installed after a lot is purchased
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new work
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 8.4 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area []Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The stormwater runoff will discharge to the North Landing River either directly from the site, or collected in swales and the
swales will discharge to the river.
I. Will wastewater or stonnwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes []No []NA
F6C�iJE])
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
2 L 1013
GTV

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
�i L.LJ
DEC 2 7 2012
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
I1. Is mere any mitigation proposed? L'' ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
It yes, attach a mitigation proposal. -.....;-.'-:'._.-.
<Forn continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, ifapplicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) - (t) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Intracoastal Waterway Retreat Inc. (SENT AND PENDING) Phone No. 252-429-3094
Address PO Box 7141 Virginia Beach, VA 23457
Name Ogden R. Reid (SENT AND PENDING) Phone No. 914-763-5337
Address 48 Mead Street Waccabuc, NY 10597
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
NCDENR Stormwater Permit SW7120709 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Cum-2013-002
October 3, 2012 October 9, 2012 .AMA r Pe r,n 1 k�lcl-qG
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Welland delineation,'' necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 12-18-12 Print Name M19Va&1 (.-1
REC TVED
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project. 2 2 2013
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM-MIM CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
RECEIVED
,wi 2 2 Z013
DCM-MHD CITY
2'=' ri,38 ::3f,d i BS8 4RCOAS7 . gar; va5tal.r :a n,ag v+tient.net

Form DCM MP-3 JAN 4 2013
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures
proposed.
22 Lots
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
22 residential units; 0.67 units/ AC
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(i) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: October 9, 2012
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking.
2.1 %
i. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by impervious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking. S>3� bb5 sF R A A
24%LT®}Ql Upar f�.dty Ck'AKka(d-Q)II 6, J
A-03S Atrq
j. Describe proposed method of sewage disposaa l.
Each lot will have a private septic tank, which is to be
installed after a lot is purchased.
1. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g., surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, 'wash down' and residential discharges).
Runoff collects in trapezoidal swales on the lot lines directly
discharge to the North Landing River. Also, stormater
runoff collects in ditched along the proposed roadway
and drains to the proposed pond in the northeast of the
site or the existing pond in the southeast of the site.
Runoff also collects in swales along Marsh Causeway
and the north of the site and discharges to the North
b. Number of lots or parcels.
22
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
8.4 AC
f. List the materials (such as mad, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
Stone paving, asphaft path, asphalt road
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stovmwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
®Yes []No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: October 3, 2012
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative stormwater
design? REC-,NED
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808.28082 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaoement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-3 (Upland Development, Page 2 of 2)
Landing River.
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g., well, n. (1) Will water be impounded? ®Yes ®No []NA
community, public system, etc.) fitJ If yes, how many acres? 0.75 acres in proposed fire
pond,
Each lot will have a private well, which is to be installed located 1,400 LF upland from CAMA setback area and
after a lot is purchased. 0.24 acres in existing pond on site, Icoated 1,080 LF
upland from CAMA setback area.
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded? p. If proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
Preliminary Plat submitted on October 22, 2012 installed for this upland development?
[]Yes ®No []NA
December18,2012 f
Date
East Point Estates I I
DEC 2 1 2012
Project Name
Michael D. Sifen I
Applicant Name
Applicant signature ®�
RECEIVED
2 2 2013
252-NC+i3.2R�o - 8G4-,t,�CiA 9 ws•. vv.nccva'talma f rneat.rIea ,ev+se& IZ26:06

LOT SUMMARY TABLE W/D
Fi
N0.
TOTAL AC.
WIDTH
DEPTH
RATIO
LOT DESC.
1
0.94
150.66'
401.69'
2.67:1
Cul-de-sac lot
2
0.93
126.43'
431.52'
3.41:1
Lot
3
1.28
125.87'
436.35'
3.47:1
Lot
4
1.13
134.03'
392.60'
2.93:1
Lot
5
1.03
53.41'
405.80'
7.60:1
Cul-de-sac lot
6
0.97
66.07'
152.56'
2.31:1
Cul-de-sac lot
7
0.93
126.41'
347.92'
2.75:1
Corner Lot
8
1.00
125.00'
347.40'
2.78:1
Lot
9
1.01
125.47'
349.66'
2.80:1
Lot
10
1.03
125.06'
364.05'
2.91:1
Lot
11
1.10
128.77'
392.33'
3.05:1
Lot
12
1.02
125.53'
319.86'
2.55:1
Corner Lot
13
0.96
169.00'
303.40'
1.80:1
Lot
14
0.96
176.67'
311.17'
1.76:1
Lot
15
1.00
129.71'
315.43'
2.43:1
Lot
16
1.10
125.00'
315.77'
2.53:1
Lot
17
1.10
125.00'
315.77
2.53.1
Lot
18
0.92
150.68'
347.01'
2.30:1
Lot
19
0.94
150.68'
357.83'
2.38:1
Lot
20
0.92
126.76'
363.40'
2.87:1
Lot
21
0.92
235.25'
171.62'
1.55:1
Corner Lot
*22
0.92
158.42'
244.01'
1.54:1e-sac
fi c E lot
TOTAL LOTS: 22
C"74-`!'1DCITY

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
A) APA ICANT: Currituck 34, LLC
County: Currituck
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island; adjacent North Landing River
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD REP: 01/07/13
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Ron Renaldi D TRICT OFFICE: Elizabeth City
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: e/co✓r Date: �3
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS UNIT: FEE REC ): $ 400 (100%)
PUBLIC NOTICE RECD: Advertise: 01/22/13 END OF NOTICE DATE: Comments due: 02/11/13
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES RECD: DEED REC ):
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: �X'91t o
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: ON23/13
t
MAIL OUT DATE: Circulation: 01/18/13
FEDERAL DUE DATE:
ON: 1 / Z -s 1113
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DATE: Comments due: 02 OW13
FED COMMENTS RECD:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY DRAFT ON
AGENCY
DATE
COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
ri
Coastal Management - Regional Representative
Coastal Management - LUP Consistency
Division of Community Assistance
_ 31
Land Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Storm Water Management (DWQ)
State Property Office
Division of Archives & History
Jf
Division of Environmental Health
_Zc�
Division of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Local Permit Office
Division of Marine Fisheries
Corps of Engineers
2.

,O't
/"
Project Name
CV I+6c
Assigned to 0--al is n .
q Ll-c
Assigned on f // Z 3 /
ACTIONS
Prepare for signature following review by other Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Date draft permit given to other Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Date reviewed by other Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Prepare draft for review by Major Permits Coordinator
S Other
S wm P kI0 5
Date draft permit given to Major Permits Coordinator
Date reviewed by other Major Permits Coordinator
�en 1 S ,S ve/ d-- s �/' �, 4
Written approval from DWQ is/'s no required for this project.

�r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
Mr. Michael D. Sifen, Member Manager
Currituck 34, LLC
500 Central Drive, Suite 106
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Dear Mr. Sifen:
Dee
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW7120709
East Point Estates
Low Density Subdivision Permit
Currituck County
The Washington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit
Application for East Point Estates on July 27, 2012 and additional information on September
25 2012. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as
proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Session Law 2008-211 and
Title 15A NCAC 21-1.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW7120709, dated October 3, 2012,
for the construction of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to
the conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supercede any other agency
permit that may be required.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such
demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact either Samir Dumpor or me at [phone].
Sincerely, RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
,c�y—_
R r Thorpe DCM-MNDCITY
Interim Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
AH/sd: KASD1Permits - Low Density1SW7120709
cc: Clay Massey, PE, Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. (1561 Bradford Road, Suite
202, Virginia Beach, VA 23455)
Currituck County Inspections
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Inbmet www.nmalemuality are
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone] One
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone] N14pfthiCarolina
An Equal Opportunity/AfirmallveAction Emit" -50%RectcW10%Post ConauffwPatter atuMAY

Wth Carbfina
1p6t m6c(ofy.,,
G6vemor
January I , 8 , 2013
N11v9NIORANDUM
TO::
47
,NCDENR
Braxfon.'O. Davis
s - DirebOor
May permits Piocessin , C, oorc
O_r 9
q,�M4 Rermit'A . ticatioh,R
SJUBJE, CIv ev:
Applicant! Cal rituck,34,LLC.
Project Locution: Ws . Y:i
172Marsh -CadiVaff KnOtIs-Is'
Proppsed, Project: -EilstTpint, Estates subdivi
sion.
pixqQ� iniiiente: below youtagency. s position
appropn=:,1111_
0, PLY:. 'Tbis,offlee h,aslno:objjeetion to th
This officebas',110:01nment on t)
This office , approvcsof the,proj
, R , c6ij),orated. �-See dita&edl
This office objects' to Ahe -M!_qY"
c6nunentS.
SIGNED,
1367 US'17 . 5b6ih, ElUbeth Cliy, 1462709 - st . Im -fl
Th 264_39o1 FAk 252-"��23,; Inlernet;NN61,A CcOa. 6 a zgemef
'An"Equaf 6ppoomity l Afflimalive'Adion EMPlOYer
TEEL
jo
—
H TrMV
VOR!G KERXIONOM
JOhnS EWO;M Ill
Secretary
CuRttucklCouniy
.-on, the pro
as -proposed..
only.if the reconimende&cliangmaTe
reasons: described in ific affiyqbje(d
One
,No lhC4r 20i2l

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservaltion Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Pat McCrory, Governor
Susan W. Mutti, Secretary
Kevin Cherry, Deputy Secretary
February'5, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: Ramona M. Bartos P%+ IC Chat vA0 EA
SUBJECT: East Point Estates Subdivision, 172 Marsh <
ER 13-0167
Thank you for your submittal of January 18, 2013, concerning
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
, Knotts Island, Currituck County,
above project.
The proposed project is located adjacent to the North Landin ' River. This project was flagged as a part of the
Currituck County Review process for an archaeological survey�of the entire 32 acre tract. We note on the
application that an archaeological survey was conducted in 2012 by Circa -Cultural Resource Management, LLC.
Out office has never received the report or site forms connect d with this survey. We recommend that any
permits issued for the project include the following conditions.
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities
submit two copies of an archaeological report preset
property by Citca-CRM, LLC. The report must mee
and the Secretary of the Interior. In addition, one c(
each site or isolated find, should be submitted with t
Archaeology through this office for review and coin
advance of any construction or ground disturbance s
thin the project area, the permittee shall
ig the results of the survey of the
ie standards established by our office
of the North Carolina site form for
survey report to the Office of State
at as soon as they are available and in
This project is located adjacent to the Flyaway Hunt Club, which was placed on the State Study List in 2008, a
preliminary step in the review of potential nomination to the Nlational Register of Historic Places. Before we
can comment on the effects of the project, we need more infor}nation about the proposal and the subject
property.
Is the "Future Road," shown between Lots 11 and 12 that ends abruptly at the Flyaway Hunt Club's property
line, required by the county's zoning or subdivision ordinance? Is the Future Road proposed for construction
when the subdivision is developed, or is it just a right-of-way d dication at this time? Can Pond 1 be reached
for maintenance using an access easement of the trail instead o the Future Road?
Location: 109 East]ones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

--;
Please also forward photographs of the cemetery on the pr
unique design or materials, and any monuments older than
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of t
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you ha
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, Environmental Review
communication concerning this project, please cite the above
cc: Michael Sifen, Currituck 34, LLC, [e-mail]
Clayton Massey, Bowman Consulting Group, cmasse;
y that show its setting, any monuments of
years old.
National Historic Preservation Act and the
with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
questions concerning the above comment,
)ordinator. at 919-807-6579. In all future
tracking number.

��ENT OF Of
A
WQP - fN
chj- p�
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. SAW-2013-00179
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Fleld Office
2407 W 5° Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
March 22, 2013
Mr. Doug Huggett RECEIVED
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment MAR 2 7 2013
and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-3421 DCM-MHD C1TY
Dear Mr. Huggett:
Reference the application of Currituck 34, LLC for a Department of the Army permit to
create a 22 lot subdivision located at 172 Marsh Causeway adjacent to the Currituck Sound in
Knotts Island, North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented by the
application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State authorization:
*. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the
attached plans, which are a part of this permit. Any modification to these plans must be approved
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) prior to implementation.
*. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States
require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or
if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or
work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the
permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to remove,
relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the
United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal,
relocation, or alteration. The permittee shall notify NOAA/NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
Chief Source Data Unit N CS261, 1315 E West HWY- RM 7316, Silver Spring, MD 20910-
3282 at least two weeks prior to beginning work and upon completion of work.
*. Except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized
land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this
project, in such a manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns within waters or
wetlands or to reduce the reach of waters or wetlands.

i0 .....'f".. v 44r..l No no bon ...1a' _ .r'fr P _ ...
u ' ..
.. __.✓.... .. _ C.. .

RECEIVED
MAR 2 7 2013
*. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this permit,
no excavation, fill or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the CITY
construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not
authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material within waters or
wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition applies to all borrow and fill activities
connected with this project.
*. Unless otherwise authorized by this permit, all fill material placed in waters or wetlands
shall be generated from an upland source and will be clean and free of any pollutants except in
trace quantities. Metal products, organic materials (including debris from land clearing
activities), or unsightly debris will not be used.
*. All mechanized equipment will be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic
materials. In the event of a spill of petroleum products or any other hazardous waste, the
permittee shall immediately report it to the N.C. Division of Water Quality at [phone],
Ext. 526 or [phone] and provisions of the North Carolina Oil Pollution and Hazardous
Substances Control Act will be followed.
*. The authorized structure and associated activity must not interfere with the public's right
to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States. No attempt will be made by the
permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to
the authorized work for reason other than safety.
*. All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water level
elevation contour within adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of
dredged materials into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters.
*. If the permittee discovers any previously unknown historic or archeological remains
while accomplishing the authorized work, he will immediately notify the Wilmington District
Engineer who will initiate the required coordination procedures.
*. The permittee shall advise the Corps in writing at least two weeks prior to beginning the
work authorized by this permit and again upon completion of the work authorized by this permit.
*. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and
conditions of this permit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide
each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this
project with a copy of this permit. A copy of this permit, including all conditions, shall be
available at the project site during construction and maintenance of this project.
*. The permittee shall employ all sedimentation and erosion control measures necessary to
prevent an increase in sedimentation or turbidity within waters and wetlands outside the permit
area. This shall include, but is not limited to, the immediate installation of silt fencing or similar
appropriate devices around all areas subject to soil disturbance or the movement of earthen fill,
and the immediate stabilization of all disturbed areas. Additionally, the project must remain in

,.. .
_. .•,
i.• .� .. G _ � rt �� .E. Ar :vf f I' ;r�, "rji n ,:fik: 1 ... e1�:...r,`�r,.
. .. ._ � L.. i .. .� .L' �; '.! ... rYir N.f �ta:: .. JI. Li. `�f
� � .. r. -' -.. ... _ .. ... .. r 't

full compliance with all aspects of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North
Carolina General Statutes Chapter 113A Article 4).
*. In order to protect juvenile finfish resources, no excavation or filling activities will be
permitted between the dates of April 1 and September 30 of any year without the prior approval
of the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
*. The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration
before completion of the work will, without expense to the United States and in such time and
manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the
water or wetland to its pre -project condition.
*. Violations of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act must be reported in writing to the Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within 24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Kyle Barnes, Washington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Kyle Barnes
Regulatory Project Manager
Copies Furnished:
Ms. Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
RECEIVED
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service MAR 2 7 2013
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726 Mf-MHDCITY
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Fritz Rhode
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Service
101 Pivers Island Road
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

NCDENR
G•13-a1. 23•072North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 18, 2013
TO: Maria Tripp Dunn
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA Permit Application Review
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
RECEIJZD
0 7 2n1i
DCM-MfID C;TY
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED g�I DATE .21542013
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] ; Internet: wm.n=astalmanagement.net N Caro/l/ina
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

�F�
.40_
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis
Governor Director
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
Charlan Owens, District Planner
Division of Coastal Management
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA Permit Application Review
Currituck 34, LLC
ot'l_
Resources
172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
East Point Estates subdivision
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
RECEWW
FEB 0 7 2013
DCM-WID CITY
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
tSIGDATE
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: 252-26Q723; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net None Carolina
fl An Equal Opportunity iAtrmativeAction Employer Nahmally

PI�.DCI�IR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvada, III
Governor Director Secretary
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
FEB 072013
TO: Doug Huggett, XCIP,
Permit Coordinator
FROM: Charlan Owen NE DCM District Planner DCM-MxDMY
SUBJECT: Major Permit Request by Currituck 43, LLC Go Michael Sifen, to develop A 22-
lot residential subdivision with associated road, drainage, walking trail, and
open space improvements (including 6 waterfront lots and open space along
the North Landing River); on the property at 172 Marsh Causeway (NC Hwy
615), in the community of Knotts Island, Cumtuck County.
Date: February 4, 2013
Consistency Determination: The request is consistent with/not in conflict with the Currituck
County 2006 Core Land Use Plan (LUP) certified by the CRC
on May 18, 2007 as amended through June 24, 2009.
Overview: The subject property is a 32.96 acre site with approximately 585 linear feet of
shoreline along the North Landing River. Site elevations range from 12 feet above Normal
Water Level (NWL) at the center to 5 feet above NWL along the north, southeast, and
shoreline to the west. The majority of the site is open except for a 2 acre wooded area to the
northeast and a .22 acre stormwater pond surrounded by .21 acre of Section 404 wetlands to
the southeast. The property is primarily outside the flood zone, with Flood zone AE along the
shoreline, at the wooded area to the northeast, and at the stormwater pond to the southeast.
The site was previously developed as a mobile home/RV park. Existing site improvements
consist of several buildings, a large picnic pavilion, several small picnic pavilions, a gazebo, a
large cement pad, a gravel access road/path and a cemetery. The buildings are in disrepair
and the gravel road is overgrown. Existing shoreline improvements consist of a wooden
bulkhead along the entire shoreline with a return along the southern property line reinforced
with concrete riprap, a 14 foot wide boat ramp with a 6 foot wide by 50 foot long pier at the
northem property line, a docking facility approximately 320 feet south of the boat ramp
consisting of a 6 foot wide by 150 foot long pier with a 16 foot square terminus platform and
three (3) 3 foot wide by 24 foot long finger piers creating four (4) slips, and a retaining wall
ranging from 6 inches to 1 foot in height running parallel to the shoreline and located 15 feet
from the bulkhead. The 50 foot long pier is missing most of the decking and has damage to
several joists and girders. The shoreline improvements were permitted through CAMA Major
Permit #49-99.
A 22-lot single family residential subdivision (including 6 waterfront lots) with associated road,
drainage, walking trail, and open space improvements is proposed. Proposed residential
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

0

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 2 of 8
density is approximately 1 unit per 1.5 acre (22 lots on 32.96 acres). All existing site
improvements except for the cemetery will be removed. The wooded area to the northeast
will be cleared.
Access from the development to Marsh Causeway (NC Hwy 165) is provided by a single
connection, with designated open space fronting the highway. Opportunities for future local
street connectivity are made possible with a cul-de-sac located near the north property line
and a future road terminating at the south property line. Installation of sidewalks and bicycle
facilities has not been addressed in the submittal.
The project is being developed as a Low Density Development for stormwater purposes. No
curb inlets, drop inlets, or underground pipes will be used. Stormwater runoff will be collected
in roadside ditches and shallow swales in between the lots. The swales will outfall into one of
the two (2) wet ponds or directly discharge into the North Landing River. Waterfront lots will
have six (6) swales extending within 75 feet of the shoreline, three (3) of those extending
within 30 feet of the shoreline, and terminating to allow sheet flow over the bulkhead into the
North Landing River.
Existing shoreline improvements will remain. The boat ramp will be a neighborhood facility
located within open space. The bulkhead will run along the boat ramp area and waterfront
lots (Lots 1 through 6). The docking facility will be associated with Lot 4.
A total of 6.38 acres of open space will be provided, to include the two (2) stormwater ponds,
a 5 foot wide asphalt walking trail, and the existing boat ramp and a dock. A 12 foot wide
heavy duty stone road with a 30 foot long hammer head turn around will be provided to
access the existing boat ramp. The damaged pier along the boat ramp will have the decking
and joists/girders replaced to bring it to usable condition. The walking trail will include a 4 foot
wide by 83 foot long boardwalk section elevated 1 foot where it crosses wetlands.
Future lot development will include individual wells and septic systems, however a .61 acre
reserve septic field area will be provided.
Placement of utility wires underground has not been addressed in the submittal.
The waters of the North Landing River in this area are classified as SC and are closed to
shellfish taking. An archaeological assessment conducted in spring of 2012 resulted in the
identification of three (3) isolated finds, no new archaeological sites, and one (1) architectural
resource. It was recommended that no further work be conducted on the finds and resource
as they are not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Previously
identified archaeological sites within 1 mile of the project include 31 CK67 and 31 CK198.
Anticipated impacts: resulting from this project are expected to include: the disturbance of
2,300 sq. ft. of Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) and 8.35 acres of
Uplands outside of the Estuarine Shoreline AEC, and; the shading of 336 sq. ft. of Section 404
Wetlands outside of an AEC.
RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 F t B 0 7 2013
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.ncooastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer DCM-MHD CITY

r
!r ,;

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 3 of 8
Basis for Determination:
The site is designated as "Limited Service Areas" on the Currituck County Future Land Use
Map (FLUM); with Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) also designated as "Conservation
Areas" as indicated on Page 11-1.
As indicated on Page 11-2, the purpose of the Limited Service designation is to provide for
primarily residential development at low densities. It is recognized that soil limitations, flood
prone areas, and a lack of infrastructure and services may prevent these areas from ever
reaching an urban level of development. Despite the overall low density of these areas,
efforts should be made to encourage clusters of residential uses to preserve open space and
to provide for a sense of a 'community". Base development density should be 1 unit per acre
but could be increased to 1.5 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon whether
service facilities are in place or planned and the potential impact on the surrounding
community.
The policy emphasis for Knotts Island is indicated on Page 11-11. The policy emphasis of this
plan is for developable areas of Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods to remain as low to very low
density residential areas. This means predominantly 1 unit per 3 acres. In keeping with the
wishes of the majority of residents in these two areas, no services or infrastructure should be
provided that would serve as an inducement to more intensive development. This means that
residences will continue to rely upon individual wells and septic systems for their water supply
and sewage treatment needs.
As indicated on Page 11-1, the purpose of the Conservation designation is to provide for the
long-term management and protection of significant, limited, or irreplaceable areas. Proper
management is needed to conserve the natural, cultural, recreational, scenic or biologically
productive values of these areas. The designation is applied to areas that should not be
developed at all (preserved), or if developed, done so in a very limited manner characterized
by careful planning and cautious attention to the conservation of environmental features. As
indicated on Page 11-2, the standards of the Conservation class shall be applied in
accordance with the site specific information made available during special studies and/or the
land development process.
Definitions of key words are provided on page 9-2. These words include "Encourage: to favor
or foster', "Should: Ought to, if no valid reason not to", and "Support: to shore up, may imply
financial support".
The following LUP policies may be applicable to this request:
Public Access:
Policy PA1, Page 9-3.
"Public access to the sound and ocean waters of Currituck County is essential to
the quality of life of residents and visitors, as well as the economy of the area.
The County supports the establishment of ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
ACCESS opportunities to the waters of Currituck County." RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net n I
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 4 of 8
Action PA-6, Page 13-1.
"The County shall continue to require major residential subdivisions that abut
public trust waters to provide public access to those waters. Access for the
general public is preferred."
Policy PAS, Page 9-4.
"DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR BOAT RAMPS AND/OR PARKING
AREAS associated with public access sites shall address, at a minimum,
requirements for stormwater runoff, water quality protections, aesthetic concerns
and adequate water depth at low tide."
Land Use Compatibility:
Policy ES1, Page 9-5.
"New development shall be permitted to locate only in areas with SUITABLE
SOIL and where ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE is available..."
Policy ES2, Page 9-5.
"NON -COASTAL WETLANDS, including FRESHWATER SWAMPS, AND
INLAND, NON -TIDAL WETLANDS, shall be conserved for the important role
they play in absorbing floodwaters, filtering pollutants from stormwater runoff,
recharging the ground water table, and providing critical habitat for many plant
and animal species. Currituck County supports the efforts of the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers in protecting such wetlands through the Section 4042 permit
program of the Clean Water Act, as well as Section 4013 water quality
certifications by the State of North Carolina."
Policy ES4, Pages 9-5 and 9-6.
"In approving new developments, Currituck County shall support the retention or
creation of vegetated buffer area along the ESTUARINE SHORELINES as a
simple, effective and low-cost means of preventing pollutants from entering
estuarine waters. Exceptions to this requirement may include developments
involving pre-existing man-made features such as hardened shorelines, ditches,
and canals... The County also supports CAMA use standards for all COASTAL
SHORELINES, whether estuarine or otherwise."
Action ES2, Page 13-2.
"Currituck County will continue to support CAMA requirements concerning the
preservation of open space buffers along estuarine shorelines..."
RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 L 7 2013
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer 1)0.!-M!.D CITY

I? r

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 5 of 8
Policy HN1, Page 9-7.
"Currituck County shall encourage development to occur at densities appropriate
for the location. LOCATION AND DENSITY FACTORS shall include whether the
development is within an environmentally suitable area, the type and capacity of
sewage treatment available to the site, the adequacy of transportation facilities
providing access to the site, and the proximity of the site to existing and planned
urban services... For example,... Projects within areas designated as Limited
Service would be permitted a density of one (1) to one and one half (1.5) units
per acre depending upon the surrounding development pattern and availability of
resources..."
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity:
Policy TR4, Page 9-11.
"ACCESS TO THE COUNTY'S MAJOR ROADWAYS shall be managed so as to
preserve the intended purpose of the highway, protect taxpayer dollars invested,
and minimize hazardous turning movements in and out of traffic flows. Methods
may include, for example, limits on the frequency of driveway cuts, shared
driveway access, minimum lot frontages, connections between adjoining parking
lots, central medians, etc."
Policy TR5, Page 9-11.
"So as to preserve the traffic moving function of the County's primary roads,
minimize traffic accidents and avoid land locking interior land parcels, Currituck
County shall discourage RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRIP
DEVELOPMENT along the county's primary roads. FLAG LOTS shall not be
permitted along designated roads unless justified by unusual or unforeseeable
parcel or topographic constraints."
Policy TR8, Page 9-11.
"Local streets shall be designed and built to allow for convenient CIRCULATION
WITHIN AND BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS and to encourage mobility by
pedestrians and bicyclists. Care shall be taken to encourage local street
"connectivity" without creating opportunities for cut -through traffic from outside
the connected areas."
Action TR-8, Page 13-16.
"The County shall continue to encourage street connectivity between similar
land uses."
RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 FEB U 7 2013
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.ncroastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer DCM-14HD CITY

r
;I

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 6 of 8
Policy TR9, Page 9-11.
"BIKEWAY FACILITIES shall be encouraged as energy -efficient, healthful, and
environmentally sound alternatives to the automobile. The inclusion of bikeways,
sidewalks, trails, and other alternatives to the automobile shall be encouraged in
both public and private developments."
Policy TR10, Page 9-11.
"Designs for all future road construction and improvements shall consider
opportunities for the inclusion of BIKE LANES within the project. Particular
attention should be given to priority bikeway facility needs as submitted for
inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program."
Policy TR12, Page 9-11.
"New residential developments shall provide for the installation of PAVED
PUBLIC ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE at the time of
development. This policy is intended to prevent the creation of substandard
developments that must later correct for infrastructure problems that could have
been avoided, had they been installed properly from the beginning. Family
subdivisions and non -asphalt roads serving the northern beaches are the only
exceptions to this policy."
Policy WS6, Page 9-13.
"Currituck County endorses the proper use and maintenance of APPROVED
SEPTIC SYSTEMS in suitable soils as an environmentally acceptable means of
treating and dispersing waste from low -density development."
Policy PR6, Page 9-14.
"AIL new residential development shall provide for ADEQUATE OPEN SPACE
AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS including, as may be appropriate, funding
in proportion to the demand created by the development. The amount of open
space and improvements may be determined according to the number of
dwelling units in the development and/or by a percentage of the total acreage in
the development. Fees in lieu of land dedication shall be based on the inflation
adjusted assessed value of the development or subdivision for property tax
purposes."
Policy NH1, Page 9-16.
"The County recognizes the risks to life and property that exist within SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (i.e. areas having a 1 % chance of flooding in any year)
that may be inundated during major storm events. The County will continue
taking measures to mitigate these risks and will avoid taking any action in these
areas that materially increases risks to life and property." RECEPM
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 FEB 0 7 2013
Phone: [phone] FAX: 252-264,3723 ; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net I
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
17CM-MHD CITY

r . .,. .. �� .. ... ., , �e .. .. t � .
,. I_
S.
l50
7 .. _ ,l
. ... - �

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 7 of 8
Policy NH2, Page 9-16.
"The County shall require development and redevelopment within SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS to meet the standards of the National Flood Insurance
Program and the County's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance..."
Water Quality:
Policy WQ3, Page 9-17.
"Currituck County supports policies, plans and actions that help protect the water
quality of the county's estuarine system by preventing SOIL EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION, and by controlling the quantity and quality of STORMWATER
RUNOFF entering the estuary."
Policy WQ4, Page 9-17.
"RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE from development, forestry and agricultural activities
shall be of a quality and quantity as near to natural conditions as possible. Post -
development runoff shall not exceed pre -development volumes."
Policy WQ5, Page 9-17.
"Development that preserves the NATURAL FEATURES OF THE SITE,
including existing topography and significant existing vegetation, shall be
encouraged. If COASTAL AND NON -COASTAL WETLANDS are considered part
of a lot's acreage for the purpose of determining minimum lot size or
development density, Low Impact Development techniques or appropriate buffers
shall be integrated into the development. Open space developments shall be
encouraged to REDUCE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS associated with new
development and redevelopment."
Policy WQ6, Page 9-17.
"Currituck County supports the retention or preservation of VEGETATED
BUFFERS along the edge of drainage ways, streams and other components of
the estuarine system as an effective, low cost means of protecting water quality."
Policy WQ7, Page 9-18.
"The environmental benefits of properly designed, VEGETATED ROADSIDE
DRAINAGE SWALES shall be recognized. Curb and gutter shall be reserved to
developments that are urban in character (i.e. less than 10,000 square foot lot
sizes) and that are served by adequate stormwater collection, retention and slow
release facilities."
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, INC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
RECEIVED
FEB 0 7 2013
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
DCM-MAD CITY

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 8 of 8
Local Countywide Concerns:
Policy CA6, Page 9-18.
"To foster an improved community appearance, promote public safety, and help
prevent service outages, the placement of UTILITY WIRES UNDERGROUND
shall be encouraged in all public and private developments."
Policy HP4, Page 9-20.
"The DESTRUCTION OF SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURAL, HISTORIC AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES in the planning area shall be discouraged."
SubArea Concerns:
Policy KI1, Page 9-22.
"The need for ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRUST WATERS in the Knotts Island area
shall be met through periodic improvements to existing public facilities. The
County also recognizes that private sector facilities may play a role in satisfying
access needs to the water."
Policy KI4, Page 9-22.
"Currituck County shall not provide or encourage the provision of
INFRASTRUCTURE OR UTILITIES that would foster greater development
densities on Knotts Island, including particularly, centralized sewage treatment
services."
RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, INC 27909 FEB 0 7 2013
Phone: [phone] FAX; 252-264-3723 ; Internet: www.ncooastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer DCM-MHD CITY

OK -
North Carolina Department of Enviro
Division of Coastal I
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Dz
Governor Director
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Anthony Scarbraugh, 401/V
Division of Water Quality -
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing
SUBJECT: CAMA Permit Application
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
and Natural Resources
Currituck County
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Pr-,HVED
J A N 2 3 2013
��1���UC
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewwppoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Mo>Fehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please coact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data, are requested.
REPLY: This ab'n, c 1G] 11V VV� Y 1Vla
✓ This agency has no comment
This agency approves of the
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the
comments.
SIGNED
1367 US 17 South, Eliz'dhetlfCity, HC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ;
An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer
uau prvjvv} uu prvpvuvaa.
the proposed project.
only if the recommended changes are
for reasons described in the attached
DATE }�J,
oRe Carolina
1)CAUVIlY

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvada, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Tim Walton, Manager
State Property Office
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA Permit Application Review
Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2013
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: office has no objection to the project as proposed.
:��: This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
1367 US 17 South. El
Phone: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
E \�'
f Carolina
A6turally

U6—
North Carolina Department of Envirol
Division of Coastal I
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Da
Govemor Director
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO:
i
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
Anthony Scarbraugh,401/P
Division of Water Quality -
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing
and Natural Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
secretary
JAN 2 3 2013
DVif VQ-WARUC
CAMA Permit Application Review \� Oats
Currituck 34, LLC
172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
East Point Estates subdivision
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue. Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data fare requested.
REPLY: / uis ag�.lcy has no V V�VVLLV31
✓ Tlus agency has no comment
This agency.approves of the
incorporated. See attached.
This agency ot:ects to tae
comments.
SIGNED
1367 US 17 South EllztlhWCity, NC 27909
Phor, 252 264 3901 \ FAX. [phone] ; Intemet:
the project as proposed.
the proposed project.
only if the recommended changes are
fir is 1110.
Tfe Y
[[jj�� �� 0.t Y �,3 :la�
f/ i
Tyr�nJ{"�11r—A.zfr/yolGra .

W-WHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvada, III
Governor Director Secretary
RECEIVED
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM .IAN 31 2013
TO: Lee Padrick DCM-MHDCrrY
Division of Community Assistance
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA Permit Application Review
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED �GC. DATE / — 2 `?' --/
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net NOne Caro/li/na
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

AL
OEM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis� John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Al \ Secretary
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
Patti Fowler
NC Department of Environmental Health
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA Permit Application Review
Currituck 34, LLC
s,a _ N1�2013,
cn
172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
East Point Estates subdivision
RECEIVED
JAN 2 8 2013
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
19 BW a's
SIGNED
This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
XThis office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
aj,W - rY P4, ;)v
DATE 114'1-
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
None Carolina
urally

Ao";'Ar D� NC6 R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 18, 2013
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
JAN 2 5 2013
TO: Tiffany Sanders, Local Permit Officer
Currituck County
DCM-MHD C1TY
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA Permit Application Review
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
X This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNE q /r DATE l e�
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoaslalmanagement.net None Caro/li/na
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

�Aw MA IV):
MUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis
Governor Director
January 18, 2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Patrick McClain, P.E., Regional Engineer / Tracy Davis
Division of Land Quality - WaRO
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA Permit Application Review
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC
Project Location: 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County
Proposed Project: East Point Estates subdivision
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 02/08/13 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ron Renaldi at [phone]. When
appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached. p( A,) 0'.51.4 q-,10 Ce,V,>w1
Q�� hon ?LIrS 5/9s wqs /SSacYf o„� /o��,7y,�, �QPORuvlh, � GG�I -lot)'aa,t
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED /U DATE ,��la�da/3 RECErvED
FEB 2 8 2013
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: mm.nccoastalmanagement.net One
NorthCarofina
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Natunil�l, J

—This is a word processing form to be completed in Microsoft Word"`
RECEIVED
NC Division of Coastal Management
Majc.r Permit Application Computer Sheet
(111012012)
JAN 2 2 2013
Applicant Curdtuck 34, LLC cdo Michael Sifen DCM-M ~1/162013
Project Site County: Currituck
Staff Ron Renaldi
District ®Elizabeth City ElWashington
❑Morehead City ❑Wilmington
Project Name: East Point Estates
Rover File:
Date of initial application submittal (E)(.• 1/&2007): 11/022012
Date application "received as complete" in the Field office (E)(: 1/82007): 11712013
PermftAuthorization: MCAMA ElDredge & Fill ❑Both
SITE DESCRIPTION/PERMIT INFORMATION
PNA: ❑ Yes ®No
Photos Taken: Yes® No❑
Setback Required (riparian): ❑ Yes ®No
Critical Habitat: El Yes ®No ❑Not Sure
15 foot waiver obtained: El Yes MNo
Hazard Notification Returned.,
❑Yes ®No
SAV: ❑Yes ❑No ®Not Sure
Shell Bottom: ❑Yes ❑No UNotSum
Temporary Impacts: ❑Yes ®No
Sandbags: El Yes ®No ❑ Not Sure
Did the land use classification come from
countyLUP. ®Yes ❑No
Mitigation Required (optional):
El Yes ®No
Moratonum Conditions: ❑Yes SNo
❑NA
Environmental Assessment Done:
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
SECONDARY WATER CLASSIFICATION- OPTIONAL (choose MAX of 4)
❑ Future Water Supply (FWS)
El Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
❑ Swamp Waters (SW)
❑ High Quality Waters (HQW)
❑ Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW)
WETLANDS IMPACTED
® (404) Corp. of Engineers (Jurisdictional
(LS) Sea lavender (Limonium sp.)
❑ (SS) Glasswort ( Salicomia sp.)
wetlands)
❑ (CJ) Saw grass (Cladium jamatcense)
❑ (SA) Salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
❑ (Sr Salt reed grass (Spartina
altemiffora)
cynosumides)
❑ (DS) Salt or spike grass (Distichlis
❑ (SC) Bullrush or three square (Scirpus
❑ (TY) Cattail (Typha sp.)
spicata)
sp.)
❑ (JR) Black needlerush (Juncus
❑ (SP) Salt/meadow grass (Spartina
roemerianus)
patens)
APPLICATION FEE
❑ No fee required - $0.00
III(A) Private w/D&F up to 1 acre; 3490
❑ M(D) Priv. public or Comm w/D&F to 1
can be applied - $250
acre; 3490 cant be applied - $400
❑ Minor Modification to a CAMA Major
El Major Modification to a CAMA Major
❑ IV Any development involving D&F of
permit - $100
permit - $250
more than 1 acre - $475
El Permit Transfer- $100
❑ 111(B) Public or commercial w/D&F to 1
El Express Permit - $2000
acre; 3490 can be applied - $400
El Major development extension request -
011. Public or commeroiaYno dredge
$100 1
and/or fill - $400
❑ 1. Private no dredge and/or fill - $250
❑ III(C) Priv. public or comm w AUF to 1
acre; 3490 can be applied; DCM needs
D WQ agreement - $400
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 02/15/10

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 2 of 4)
Applicant: Currituck 34, LLC c% Michael Sifen
Date: 111612013
Describe below the ACTIVITIES that have been applied for. All values should match the dimension order, and units of
measurement found in your Activities code sheet
TYPE
REPLACE
Activity Name
Number
Choose
Choose
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Dimension 4
One
One
Boardwalk
I
New Work 0
Replace
84
4
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
High ground
1
New work
Replace
1198
1198
disturbance
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Highway/stree
1
New work
Replace
1150
24
t
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Highway/stree
I
New work ®
Replace
400
24
t
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Highway/scree
1
ft"w°"'
Replace
550
24
t
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Highway/stree
1
New work 0
Replace
400
12
t
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Subdivision
1
New work N
Replace
33
22
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
New WorkI
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
RECEIVED
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
JAN 22 2013
Maint❑
❑Y❑N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work El
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New W =
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Wofk
Replace
Maint ❑ JOYON
rovised 02/15/10

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of a)
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 Z013
revised 02115/10

T
NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer sheet, Page 3 of 4)
Applicant: Curritudr 34, UC clo Michael Slfen
Date: 111612013
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found In your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
tem im acts
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
impact amount
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
tam impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
High Ground
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ®
1435535
1435535
USCoE
designated
wetland
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
336
336
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ET F—Y-10 Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
RECEIVED
FG,N 2 2 2013
DCmd %i ID CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 02/15110

r-
North Carolina
Pat McCrory
Governor
NCDENR
Department of Environment and
Division of Coastal Management
Mr. Clayton E. Massey
Bowman Consulting Group
1561 Bradford Road, Suite 202
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
Dear Mr. Massey:
Braxton C. Davis
Director
January 18, 2013
Natural Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of the
application submitted on behalf of Currituck 34, LLC for State approval for development
of their property located at 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County. It
was received complete on January 7, 2013, and appears to be adequate for processing
at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is March 23, 2013. An
additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary to
complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline
stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those
circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an
additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
If this agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from January 7, 2013,
you may request a meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and
permit staff to discuss the status of your project. Such a meeting will be held within five
working days from the receipt of your written request and shall include the property
owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of
the proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard
which must be posted at the property of the proposed development. You should post
this notice at a conspicuous point along the property where it can be observed from a
public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or
tree along the road right-of-way fronting the property, or at a point along the road right-
of-way where a private road would lead one into the property. Failure to post this notice
could result in an incomplete application.
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Clayton E. Massey
Bowman Consulting Group
January 18, 2013
Page 2
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have
any questions and notify me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of Ron Renaldi's
field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely,
Frank Jennings
District Manager, Northeast District
FJ/yc
Enclosure
cc: Doug Huggett, Major Permits Coordinator, DCM, Morehead City, NC
Ron Renaldi, Field Representative, DCM, Elizabeth City, NC
Michael Sifen, Currituck 34, LLC, Applicant, Virginia Beach, VA
RECEIVED
.IA\ 2 2 2013
DCM-MgD CITY

NOTI(lo$174A
CAMA PERMIT
APPLIES FOR
PROJECT: c REA T E �= Z'Z-cr S"gD/✓/Se • AJ ul) TN
1 ftG<ESS X=-fi%iS, 2sf4VJA`� is 'dbATC.4a•ei_
SiTolets'. 4 K FIRE PaNO_ f I?il;GAl-IF C.1A m
frQAit-S . toRAlo,ga;� �.4 .ScLCuf N0 IREf AiK rVa c X.
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH a Z li/ /i 3
APPLICANT: FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
L t c �1 yiK eF CaAs,r*c MAtyA"p,ewi"
WlIc-H AEC. SfoP4 N 13c.7 U-1 mwy /7 So.4T'04
50" CENTQA(. ,OQ• s f-407 zm4 E4/ 2A BFT}t c/n� fv c
WOeGIMIA 6E.fc i Z3Y5Y 9a^+ Q d'.J04s.vr
?S*? - yY(p - //2'2 2SZ- 2Gy- 35't/, 4icT, 23 2

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis
Governor Director
EMAIL MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan Simpson
The Coastland Times
Manteo, NC 27954
le,[e-mail]
FROM: Yvonne Carver for Ron Renaldi
DATE: 01 /18/13
SUBJECT: Public Notice: Currituck 34, LLC
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Please publish the attached Notice in the Tuesday, January 22, 2013 issue of The
Coastland Times.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original
copy of the published notice, and an original invoice to Melissa Sebastian, NC
Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC
28557, (Telephone [phone]).
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact me at our Elizabeth City office [phone].
Attachment
cc: Doug Huggett, Major Permits Coordinator, DCM, Morehead City
Michele Walker, PIC, DCM, Raleigh
Melissa Sebastian, Accounts Payable, DCM, Morehead City
File
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]: Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NCDENR hereby gives public notice as required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that
application for a permit in an AEC as designated under the CAMA was received on
01/07/13. Currituck 34, LLC proposes to create a subdivision, East Point Estates, to
include roadways, stormwater fire pond, walking trails, drainage swales, & repair a dock
at 172 Marsh Causeway in Knotts Island, Currituck County.
A copy of the entire application may be reviewed at the office of the Division of
Coastal Management, located at 1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC, 252-264-3901
during normal business hours. Comments mailed to Braxton Davis, Director, DCM, 400
Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557, prior to 02/11/13 will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be considered up to the time of permit
decision. Project modification may occur based on review & comment by the public,
state & federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided
upon written request.
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: Tuesday, January 22, 2013

MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX
Applicant: CvrrA, - 3q LLL CEro+
Selection
Development Type
Fee
DCM %
DWQ %
(14300 1601 435100093 1625 6253)
(24300 1602 435100095 2341)
I. Pri e, non-comme�� 61
develop nt thalmm s not
'
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
involve the irfg or
excavatiofi of wetlands
III
or open water areas:
It. Public or commercial
development that does not
Sd0i)
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
III. For development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
It
B, C, or D below applies:
III Private, non -
El
al development, if
$250
10090 ($250)
0% ($0)
General Quality
Cert'rfici�tioii No. 90 (See
attached can be a ' d:
III(B). Public or commercial
El
development, if General
$400
100 (($400)
0% ($0)
Water Quality Certification
No. 3490 (See attached)
can be applied:
If General Water
Qua' Certification No;"
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
3490 ( e attached) c6uld
be applie , but DGM staff
RLCi
lIII(C).
determined*'additional
review an ri n DWQ
�I 2 2
concur�e Geis needed
becaifse of concerns,
related to water quality or
aquaticlife:
DCM-MHD
III(D). If General Water
Quality Certification No.
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
3490 (see attached) cannot
be applied:
IV. For development that
El
involves the filling and/or
$475
6q% ($285)
40% ($190)
excavation of more than
one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:

Bowman
C O N 5 U L T I N G
October 30, 2012
Ogden R. Reid
48 Mead Street
Waccabuc, NY 10597
RE: East Point Estates, Currituck, North Carolina; PB 12-10
BCG Project No. 9283-01-001
Dear Mr. Reid:
Y
D
DEC 2 7 2012
LNF
t_
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY
Our client for the above reference project is currently seeking permits for the East Point Estates
development and part of this process requires them to notify you as an adjacent property owner
near this development. Please review the enclosed information and submit any comments you
may have within 30 days to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management at the following
address.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Please complete the Riparian Property Owner Information Section of this package and return this
form to us in the included self addressed envelope. Should you have project specific questions
you may contact me at 757-464-0622.
Very truly yours,
BOWMAN CONSULTIN ROUP, LTD,
Brian J. Mesiti, EIT
Engineer III
cc: Mike Sifen, Currituck 34, LLC
Enclosures
Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.
1561 Bradford Road • Suite 202 •Virginia Beach, VA 23455
Phone: [phone] • Fwc 757.313.9226 • www.bowmanconsulting.com

rrl
S
e .
e. F.t•lHJoi'iwt�
rl
`1
C
I A L USA
-r
M
Postage 6
17-
Certified Fee
m
O
CO
Retum Recelpt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
r.), 3.
Her,
O
Restrlc[etl Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
O
to
Total Postage & Fees $
�f' • �t�
T?
A
Ogden R. Reid
,a
•a
Mead Street
0
r`
148
Waccabuc, NY 10597
-
I
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
A. liijq m
item 4 if Restr ted Delivery is desired.
■ Print le
e� Aj �_ ❑ Agent
K
yourn and address on the reverse
❑Addressee
so that we c ,A return the card to you.
■ Attach this c # d to the back of the mailplece,
B. Received by (Printed Name)
C. Date of Delivery
or on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addressed to;
D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? ❑ Yes'
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Ogden R. Reid
48 Mead Street
Waccabuc, NY 10597
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mall ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receiptfor Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ YW
2. Article ftmserMoelaw
(2603 7346 aN3
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt lozsss-oz-Masao I
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY
r, k 1,` I
f5
DEC 2 7 20'12
'!'r;'C;ty

I
Bowman DEC 27 y2012 -
C O N 5 U L T I N G
October 30, 2012
Intracoastal Waterway Retreat, Inc.
PO Box 7141
Virginia Beach, VA 23457
RE: East Point Estates, Currituck, North Carolina; PB 12-10
BCG Project No. 9283-01-001
Dear Sir or Madam:
RECEIVED
22 2013
DCM-AMD CITY
Our client for the above reference project is currently seeking permits for the East Point Estates
development and part of this process requires them to notify you as an adjacent property owner
near this development. Please review the enclosed information and submit any comments you
may have within 30 days to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management at the following
address.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Please complete the Riparian Property Owner Information Section of this package and return this
form to us in the included self addressed envelope. Should you have project specific questions
you may contact me at 757-464-0622.
Very truly yours,
BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD.
Brian J. I�tl—
esiti, E
Engineer III
cc: Mike Sifen, Cunituck 34, LLC
Enclosures
Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.
1561 Bradford Road • Suite 202 • Virginia Beach, VA 23455
Phone: [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.bowmanconsulting.com

92d3
►l
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION FORM
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Currituck 34, LLC
property located at 172 Marsh Causeway
(Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on North Landing River in Currituck County
(Waterbody)
Agent's Name #: Bowman Consulting Group
Agent's phone #: [phone]
I
(Name of Property Owner)
(City/Town and/or County)
N.C.
MaiiingAddress: 1561 Bradford Road
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
He/She has described to me as shown below the development he/she is proposing at that location,
and I have no objections to the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must fill in description below or,attacb a site drawing)
IA site drawing is attached. JAiV 2 2 2013 + DEC" 2 7 2012
! I I
DCM-MHDCITv
If you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices is
available at www.nccoastalmangement.neticontact dcm.htm or by calling 1-8684RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail
(Property Owner Information)
Signature
Currituck 34, LLC
or Type Name
500 Central Drive, Suite 106
Mailing Address
Virginia Beach, VA
City/StatelZip
757-486-1122
Telephone Number
10/22/2012
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
tnatuf,9,1,"-
Print or Type Name
Mailing Address
City/State/Zip
Telephone Number
Date

Postal
'CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEIPT
Ln
(DomesticC3
ra
ti
Ln
Ri
17-
POfi1me
g
Cene Fee
r3
M
Retum Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
O
Fee
Restridedrsem Delivery Required)
(Endorsement Required)
_
M1
Un
r9
Total Postaoe a Fees
Q
Intracoastal Waterway Retreat, Inc.
PO Box 7141
M1
Virginia Beach, VA 23457
-----------------
■ Complete ems 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if stdcted Dellvery Is desired.
■ Print you name and address on the reverse
so that can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Intracoastal Waterway Retreat, Inc.
PO Box 7141
Virginia Beach, VA 23457
j PP"
2 7
0',
i
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-= CITY
7'U' M
Agent
❑ Addressee
`_ I C. Date okelivery
D. Is delivery address different from Item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mall ❑ Express Mali
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number, 7 p 11 151 dOD 3 1345 150
(Transfer Imm service fabep
PS Form 3311, February 20D4 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 t

f
' - Doc ID: OOt8974t0�' """'`�"`•�a.wi
' I Recorded) 10/11/200nt Dp ' OR
Fee Art its 420.o0 Page 1 T 3
TliA1�'SF$itTAXAMOi1)\ �. cu��ituck 0etntY�DtJC RECEIVED
.'� \ DA,t�E(CGfLL.EC'(•pR - _ charlane Y Dowdy ReAlater o Dee
t BK969 Pe863-8 5
Tax•CoHect9rCMMFfi tion'1hatNoDefinquentTaxes DEC 2 ] 2012
*' v rYie Due.,4iate
/0. • rY By_*" Certification
aPireSJa166"'oftheyear loKwgcertificationdate. NORTH CAROLINA EXCISE STAMPS
J `t ATTACHED AND CANCELLED COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
Mail after r9cording to Brumsey and Brumsey, PLLC PO Box 100;''GUNW4.tuck. C 27929 _
PrepNared by: RicWard D. Allred, Esq, consideration: $2,200;=t)'.'0o
301 Cleveland Place, #103 "
!� V�igttd_i Beach, VA 23462 File no. 06 B 37323 i`"'_L;YLI;
(357)228-574Q
JAn1 2 2 2013
IDES-D OF PARGAIN AND SALE
THIS DEET OF BARGAIN AND .SALE, made this Sth day of October,
2006, by and between Wi1`TIST,CPUNtIL OF NORFOLK, (a/k/a Baptist
\ - -, + -r
Council of Norfolk .Iiic. a Vir
• §izia 'ion-pro€it corporation (the
"GRANTOR"); and CURRI$i3CK 34, L.x.,C.,.a Virginia limited liability
company (the "GRANTEL"), whoseraddAs(S iCs Currituck 34, L.L.C.,
c/o Michael D. Sifen, '&nc.'I Attrn: Abcoyatiii� Dept., 500 Central
Drive, Suite 106, Virginia' Be-adh, Virg1nia'.23464.
That for and in consi+deratito*a of this -sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00), cash in hand pAd, Viand .'other;-' good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency "n.a ieceipt of which are hereby
acknowledged, the GRANTOR does hereby ,graIht aitd convey, with
General warranty and English Covenants of Title unto tl}e, GRANTEE
the following described property, to wit'
That certain tract of land situate on the West bide o't�,;ryad!
running from Creeds to Knotts-Island, containin4t324:'&5 'scrAs more or
less, located on what is generally known as',Morse+s Poiht, boµnded on
the East by said Knotts Island Road, on the South 4nd East bV1 the
lands now or formerly belonging to Ogden Reed;.,.Qn;theJwest by
Currituck Sound, and on the North by land. now or fga'merly belonging
to John King, together with all riparian rights in''Curiitulk $oun8x
shown upon a certain plat or survey thereof titled "Plat Of at,part bf
Cason Farm, Currituck County, North Carolina", prepared by S.'Slscren
Page 1 of 3

s
pit or survey is hereby attached and made a part of this deed. Tnis
is'a part of the same property which was devised to Annie L. Heistand
by Will of J. C. Cason, deceased, of record in Will Book 6 at page
537_,et seq in the Clerks Office of the Superior Court of Currituck
+' C,6unty of North Carolina, and which. upon the death of said Annie L.
Heistand on February 11, 1941, descended to her niece and nephew,
:Bessie S. Gibney and Robert B. Stevens, a s her sole and only heirs
�. law.
There`is excepted from this conveyance the cemetery site situated
Mtn said tract of land as shown on the above mentioned plat. And
by acgzgtance of this deed grantee, its successors and assigns,
covenants\that it will provide perpetual care for said cemetery
i and keep sine clean and clear of weeds and other obnoxious matter.
BEdNGrthe slue property conveyed to Baptist Council of Norfolk, a
Virgi'Yiia cgrporation, by Deed, dated November 28, 1960, from Bessie
` W. Gibney And Frederick A. Gibney, husband and wife, William F.
' aaker, Jr'., sting as guardian of Robert B. Stevens, and Verna
Creech SthvgKs, iii,ie of Robert B. Stevens, and recorded in Deed Book
93, at PaQc 133 in'\he Clerk's Office of the Superior Court of
CuVituhjCounty, North Carolina.
♦ !
This'•• teyanceq is'madef^eacpressly subject to the conditions,
restrictions,' reeer4tio;s;and easements of record in the chain of
title, if any, cbfistituping c8nst7uctive notice, which have not
' 1
expired by any�,.time ,1iiitat3og _pa ained therein or otherwise
become ineffective.
WITNESS the following grbwatlireo 'land; seals:
BAPTIST COUIFC�L IO& *NORFOLK, INC.
(SEAL)
ATTEST: `
� 4 (SMAt1L
Phy is H. sawyer, Pcretary
Page 2 of, 3 i
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCD4-MIID CITY

r '
j CITY 01 VIRGINIA BEACH, to wit:
' I,''fichard D. Allred, a Notary Public
in and for the City and
State aforesaid, do hereby certify Michael
K. Imperial, President
ofr Baptist Council of Norfolk (a/k/a Baptist Council of Norfolk,
Inc.),*, a Virginia corporation, and Phyllis
ptorfblk
H. Sawyer, Secretary of
Baptist Council, whose names are signed to the foregoing
\'
nstryynent, bearing date on the Sth day
of October, 2006, have
acdwfbdged the same before me in my City
and State aforesaid.
+• ` ��' GIVEN'under my hand and seal this 5th
day of October, 2006.
71
I Notary Public���wjt�i�'s
My�comission;expires: October
31, 2007.
= OF =`
',
yZ04 �0' ;
i
r
RECEIVED
v,,r 22 2013
�r
.4 r
J
Page 3 of 3
r
v +, ,•
i , 1
' 1 '

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2012-01677 County: Currituck U.S.G.S. Quad:
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA
Protterty_Owner; Mr. Michael D. Siffen
500 Central Drive
Address: Suite 106
Virginia Beach, Virginia
23454
Agent: Mr. K
Property description:
JA N 4 2013
Bowman Consultine
Address: 3951 Westerre Parkway
Suite 106
Richmond, Vireinia 23233
Size (acres) 32_65 Nearest Town Knott's Island
Nearest Waterway Marsh Causeway River Basin Chowan River
USGS HUC 03010205 Coordinates 36.545017 N-76.003558 W
Location description: The oroiect area evaluated is located on the west side of Marsh Causeway just south of the
intersection of Marsh Causeway and Porchard Lane adjacent to the North Landing River
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
jti,N 2 2 2013
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
X
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 12/12/2012, Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the,
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Dan Bacon at910-251-4619.
C. Basis For Determination Wetland I did have the three parameters required to conclude that the area is
jurisdictional. The tributary on the northwest portion of the property displayed an ordinary high water mark. The
remainder of the project area did not exibit the three parameters identified in the Regional Supplement to the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Manual. The two drainage features coming off of the POW did not display an
ordinary high water mark. The majority of the project area is upland field, forest and river frontage.
D. Remarks Site visit was conducted on 11 Sep 2012 and 16 Oct 2012 JAN 2 2 2013
E. Attention USDA Program Participants DCM-Amcrry
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 33). Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1 OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to s _ _ A form, it must be received at the above address by 10 Feb 2013.
*It is not necessary, sub: tii gn i f n to t � r ' ion)^ a if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.'•
Corps Regulatory
Date: 12 Dec 2012 Expiration Date: 12 Dec 2017
The Wilmington District is. mm, providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http://per2.nn.usace.arrny.mil/survey.htm] to
complete the survey online,

Attached is: ( --
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of rmission) I
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of rmission
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION 7 ^
;r D
EJ
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SEtT4 I fd _ Iri o t gmi yo ryl pp t �g irl aft aR}Soa� of rs 9fsQve deeiston
ArOW1to i I �Y I d t
...... 'y}y�
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. RECEIVED
!%aN 2 2 2013
1)CM-1AD CITY

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
Preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing theldeoision-ar-ywr.ohjections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to �eiarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
JA NI 1 2013
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Dan Bacon
2407 West 5'" Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
910-251.4619
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room I0M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
IRIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government I
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of anv site investigation. and will have the ooDortunity to Darticioate in all site investigations.
of
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this forth to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: _, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Array Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M1S, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone].

RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM MHD CITY

In
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
October 9, 2012
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS- -
I I:
Currituck 34, LLC
ATTN: Mr. Michael D. Sifen, Manager
500 Central Drive, Suite 106 DEC; 2 7 2K
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23454
RE: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No.: Cum-2013-002 ,
-- --._- __ RECEIYEI}.._
Project Name: East Point Estates
Location: Marsh Causeway, Mackay Island County: Currituck
River Basin: Pasquotank ! A N 22 201 "'
Date Received by LQS: September 26, 2012
Acres Approved: 8.0 Project Type: Revised
Project Description: Clearing, grubbing and grading for construction of roads, open
drainage and 2 stormwater ponds and the clearing of building
envelopes on the proposed lots.
Dear Sir:
This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the planto be
acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval with Modifications. The modifications required
for approval are listed on the attached page. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years following
the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken, as required by 15A NCAC
4B.0129, unless modified by other legislation.
Please be advised that 15A NCAC 4B.0118(a) requires that a copy of the approved erosion and
sedimentation control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter as giving the
Notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to ensure compliance with
the approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is performance oriented, requiring
protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. It following the commencement of
this project, it is determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (G. S. 113A-51 through 66), this
office may require revisions to the plan and implementation ofthe revisions to ensure compliance with
the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and State
water quality laws, regulations and rules. In addition, local city or county ordinances or rules may
also apply to this land -disturbing activity. This approval does not supersede any other permit or
approval
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 • Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr,orgtwebArAand-quality
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50%RecydeM0% Post Consumer Paper

IN
Currituck 34, LLC
ATTN: Mr. Michael D. Sifen, Manager
October 9, 2012
Page 2
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form, which you have submitted. You are required to file an
amended form if there is any change in the information included on the form. NOTE: Neither this
approval nor the financial responsibility/liability cited in it automatically transfer with a change in
project ownership. In addition, 15A NCAC 4B.0127(c) requires that you notify this office of the
proposed starting date for this project (using the enclosed Project Information Sheet). Please notify
us if you plan to have a preconswction conference.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES General Stormwater
Permit NCG010000 (Construction Activities). You should first become familiar with all of the
requirements for compliance with the enclosed permit.
Sincerely,
Patrick Ff. McClain, PE
Regional Engineer
Enclosures
cc w/o enc: Brian J. Mesiti, Bowman Consulting
Regional Supervisor, Division of Water Quality
Donna Voliva, Currituck county Planning Department
RECEI'MD
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-IAHD CITY

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No.: Curri-2013-002
Project Name: East Point Estates R!
October 9, 2012
MODIFICATIONS 9 2
Page A
AS THE DECLARED RESPONSIBLE PARTY, YOUR LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY is
to understand the Act and comply with the following minimum requirements of the Act:
A In the event of a conflict between the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution
Control Act, the submitted plan and/or the contract specifications, the more restrictive
requirement shall prevail;
B. The land disturbing activity shall be conducted in accordance with the approved
erosion and sedimentation control plan;
C. The LATEST APPROVED erosion and sediment control plan will be used during
periodic unannounced inspections to determine compliance and a copy of the plan
must be on file at the job site. If it is determined that the implemented plan is
inadequate, this office may require the installation of additional measures and/or that
the plan be revised to comply with state law.
D. All site revisions, including those required by other local, state or federal agencies,
which affect site layout, drainage patterns, limits of disturbance and/or disturbed
acreage must be submitted to this office for approval a minimum of 15 day prior
implementing the revision;
E. Revisions exceeding the approved scope of this project without this offlas prior
approval of the plan showing the changes can be considered a violation. Failure to
comply with any part of the approved plan or with any requirements of this program
could result in appropriate legal action (civil or criminal) against the financially
responsible party. Legal actions could include Stop Work Orders, the assessing of a
civil penalty of up to $5000 for the initial violation and/or a civil penalty of up to
$5000 per day for each day the site is out of compliance.
F. The CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL must be posted at the primary
entrance to the job site and remain until the site is permanently stabilized
G. In cases of natural disaster related changes to the proposed land disturbing activity, all
appropriate actions and adequate measure installations may be performed to prevent
sediment damage, prior to submitting and receiving approval of the revised plan. A
revised plan must be submitted for approval as soon as possible, but no later than 15
days after all emergency actions have been performed;

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No.: Cum-2013-002
Project Name: East Point Estates
October 9, 2012
MODIFICATIONS
Page B
H. Erosion and sediment control measures or devices are to be constructed and/or
installed to safely withstand the runoff resulting from a 10 year storm event (25 year
storm event in High Quality Zones). The 10 year storm event is generally equivalent
to a storm producing 6.5 - 7 inches in 24 hours or at the rate of 6.5 - 7 inches in 1
hour, depending on the location of the project within the region;
I. No earthen material is to be brought on or removed from the project site, until the off -
site borrow and/or disposal sites are identified as part of the erosion control plan. If
an off -site borrow and/or disposal site is to be utilized, submit the name and
identification number (E&SCP# or NIme Permit #), prior to use.
A buffer zone, sufficient to restrain visible sedimentation within the 25% of the width
closest to the land disturbance, must be provided and maintained between the land -
disturbing activity and any adjacent property or watercourse.
RECEWND In order to comply with the intent of the Act, the scheduling of the land -disturbing
activities is to be such that both the area of exposure and the time between the land
JAN 2 2 2013 disturbance and the providing of a ground cover is minimized.
L. Unless a temporary, manufactured, lining material has been specified, a clean straw
DCM-MHD CITY mulch must be applied, at the minimum rate of 2 tons/acre, to all seeded areas. The
mulch must cover at least 75% of the seeded area after it is either tacked, with an
acceptable tacking material, or crimped in place.
M. New or affected cut or filled slopes must be at an angle that can be retained by
vegetative cover or other adequate erosion -control devices or structures appropriate,
AND must be Provided with a Around cover sufficient to restrain erosion within
(ANNUAL RYE GRASS IS NOT in the APPROVED seeding specifications NOR
is it an ACCEPTABLE substitute for the providing of a temporary ground cover).
N. A permanent Around cover. sufficient restrain erosion, must be provided within the
shorter of 15 working or 90 calendar days (if in a High Quality Zone, the shorter of
15 working or 60 calendar days) after completion of construction or development on
any portion of the tract (ANNUAL RYE GRASS IS NOT in the APPROVED
seeding specifications Q is it an ACCEPTABLE substitute for the providing of a
nurse cover for the permanent grass cover).

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No.: Cum-2013-002
Project Name: East Point Estates
October 9, 2012
MODIFICATIONS
Page C
1- -
0. All sediment and erosion control details for this project must conform to the standards
as shown in the current Erosion & Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual;
These details must be utilized for construction and incorporated in the plan. The
Design Manual maybe found on-line at: http://portal.ne-denr.org/wtb/Ir/pubfications
2. Adequate and appropriate measures must be properly installed downstream within the limits
of disturbance, of any land disturbing activity to prevent sediment from leaving the limits of
disturbance, entering existing drainage systems, impacting an on -site natural watercourse or
adjoining property
3. This approval does not include any grading on the proposed lots except what is necessary to
tidy up after the removal of some existing features — clumps of trees, concrete pads.
Development of individual lots 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 & 17, as shown on the
Planting Plan for East Point Estates (dated June 12, 2012) may require individual erosion and
sedimentation control plan approvals prior to construction.
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MAD CITY

PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF EAST POINT ESTATES
TRACT
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NC #
Prepared For:
Bowman Consulting
3951 Westerre Parkway, Suite 150
Richmond, Virginia 23233
[phone]
Prepared By.
Dawn M. Frost and Carol D. Tyrer
Circa- Cultural Resource Management, LLC
453 McLaws Circle, Suite 3
Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
[phone]
June 2012
RECEWM
JAN 2 2 2013
DM-MHDCrrY

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
In the spring of 2012, Bowman Consulting contracted Circa— Cultural Resource
Management, LLC (Circa—) to conduct a Phase I cultural resources survey of the East
Point Estates Tract in Currituck County, North Carolina. The purpose of this Phase 1
cultural resources survey was to complete an assessment and to identify and record all
historic resources within the areas of high potential prior to development of the site. This
survey resulted in the identification of three isolated finds, no new archaeological sites,
and one ca. 1980s architectural resource, as well as one archaeological location
associated with the house site with that resource.
No further work is recommended for the three isolated finds or the location as they are
not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
The ca. 1985 camp complex is vacant and in various stages of disrepair. Further,
because the camp dates to the 1980s, it is not considered eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places. The cemeteryfound within the camp complex dates
to the early 201h century and is likely the remains of a small family cemetery of the
previous owners of the property. The project design has been changed to preserve this
resource in an open space. While the cemetery does not appear to be potentially eligible
for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, Circa- does recommend that the
site be marked in the field during construction activities with orange safety fencing and
identified on all project maps. If the site cannot be avoided, Circa— would recommend
that the cemetery be removed and relocated. The archaeological location consisted of
mid to late 201h century construction debris associated with the camp complex.
RECEIVED
,1AN 2 2 2013
f)Cg4 ^P"7 CITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY.....................................................................
TABLEOF CONTENTS..............................................................................
LISTOF FIGURES.......................................................................................
LIST OF PLATES.........................................................................................
LISTOF TABLES.........................................................................................
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT.....................................................................
Soils...........................................................................................................
Soils Identified Within the Project Area .....................................................
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ...................
Historic Context .................................................... r... ....
.............................
Native American Sites Context..................................................................
HistoricContext..........................................................................................
PropertyHistory .........................................................................................
Previously Recorded Cultural Resources ..................................................
Archaeological Resource Potential............................................................
Native American Site Potential..................................................................
Historic Site Potential.................................................................................
METHODS AND TECHNIQUES................................................................
ResearchStrategy......................................................................................
Methods......................................................................................................
ArchivalResearch........................................................................................
Architectural Field Methods.......................................................................,
Archaeological Field Methods.....................................................................
LaboratoryMethods.....................................................................................
RESULTS OF SURVEY
.................... IV
......................5
......................6
....................11
....................11
....................13
....................13
....................13
...................18
....................25
....................25
....................26
...................26
...................27
...................29
...................29
...................32
...................32
...................32
...................32
................... 32
...................................................................................................33
Architectural Resources.......................................:......................................
CampComplex............................................................................................
Archaeological Resources..........................................................................
Location1....................................................................................................
IsolatedFinds...............................................................................................
SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............
Architectural Resources..............................................................................
IsolatedFinds..............................................................................................
Archaeological Resources..........................................................................
BIBLIOGRAPHY...........................................................................................
Appendix A: Artifact Inventory
................33
................33
................44
................47
...............48
...............48
...............48
...............49
...............49
...............50
RECEral)
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-M11D CITY
ii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.
Approximate location of project area on USGS Creeds quadrangle...................5
Figure 2.
1990 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................7
Figure 3.
1994 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................7
Figure 4.
1998 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................8
Figure 5.
2003 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................8
Figure 6.
2006 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................9
Figure 7.
2008 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth................................9
Figure 8.
2010 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth..............................10
Figure 9.
Current aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth ..........................10
Figure 10.
Project area soil map, from NRCS website.....................................................12
Figure 11. Detail of 1709 Lawson Map From Francis L. Hawks' History of North
Carolina from 1663 to 1729, Vol. H. E. J. Hale & Son: 1858...........................................19
Figure 12. Detail of Northern Part of the Map of the Province of North Carolina 1730 by
H. Moll...............................................................................................................................20
Figure 13. Detail of 1744 Map of Lord Carteret's Grant . ................................................ 20
Figure 14. Detail of A Compleat Map of North -Carolina From an Actual Survey, by John
Collett, 1770......................................................................................................................21
Figure 15. Detail of An Accurate Map of North and South Carolina with their Indian
Frontiers, Shewing in a distinct manner all the Mountains, Rivers, Swamps, Marshes,
Bays, Creeks, Harbours, Sandbanks and Soundings on the Coasts; with The Roads and
Indian Paths; as well as The Boundary or Provincial Lines, The Several Townships and
other divisions of the Land In Both the Provinces, 1775. By Henry Mouzon, Jr.............22
Figure 16. Detail of 1808 Map by John Price & John Strothers.......................................23
Figure 17. Detail of S.E. portion of Virginia and N.E. portion of N'th Carolina drawn b.
Serg't Ch. Worret ; & compiled under the direction of Col. T.J. Cram, Chief Top'l Eng'r
Dep't Va. 1860s.................................................................................................................24
Figure 18. Detail of 1921 Map of Cur ituck County that ran in The Independent Friday,
January6, 1922; pg. 11......................................................................................................24
Figure 19. Resources within one -mile radius of project area boundaries .........................26
Figure 20. Aerial view of camp complex.........................................................................34
Figure 21. Map showing shovel test locations across the projecttract .............................45
Figure 22. Representative shovel test profiles..................................................................46
LIST OF PLATES
Plate 1. View of house, looking north .....................
Plate 2. View of house and addition, looking north.
Plate 3. View of concrete pad, looking south..........
Plate 4. View of gazebo, looking southwest............
Plate 5. View of pavilion #1, looking northwest.....
Plate 6. View of dock, looking east .........................
Plate 7. View of bulkhead, looking northeast..........
Plate 8. View of ruin #1, looking northwest............
Plate 9. View of ruins #2, looking northeast............
iii
.........................34
.........................35
.........................35
.........................36
.........................37
......................... 37
......... It MIWD..............................38
.....................................................38
....Y 2 2' ZUt3.......................... 39
DCM-MHD CITY

Plate 10.
View of pavilion #2, looking south...................................................................40
Plate 11.
View of pavilion #3, looking south...................................................................40
Plate 12.
View of shed, looking west...............................................................................41
Plate 13.
View of cemetery, looking, north......................................................................42
Plate 14.
View of cemetery marker, detail.......................................................................43
Plate 15.
View of cemetery marker, detail.......................................................................43
Plate 16.
View of cemetery boundary marker, detail.......................................................44
Plate 17.
View of project area, looking west....................................................................45
Plate 18.
View of project area, near river bank, looking north.........................................47
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Deed Research for East Point Estates Tract.......................................................25
Table 2. Resources Within a One -Mile Radius of Project Area Boundaries ....................25
Table 3. Previously Identified Native American Sites Within One Mile of the Project
Area....................................................................................................................................28
Table 4. Previously Identified Historic Archaeological Sites Within One Mile of the
ProjectArea.......................................................................................................................30
Table 5. Summary of identified resources and recommendations....................................49
RECEIVED
.ic,N 2 2 2013
DC V-AIHD CITY
iv

INTRODUCTION
In the spring of 2012, Circa- Cultural Resource Management, LLC (Circa-) conducted a
Phase I cultural resources survey of the high probability areas identified within the East
Point Estates tract in Currituck County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The entire East Point
Estates tract is approximately 36 acres, of which approximately six acres was determined
to be high probability. The project area is located adjacent to the North Landing River
and is bordered by a trailer park to the north, rural residential lands to the south, Marsh
Causeway (Route 615) to the east, and the North Landing River to the west.
03 1
Sandy
P6 V n41
y Few \ �"
Aenel lme p cmv�p Y'�pini ro h [ to}amet on Network[ r �� /_l`1•±"' '
Ne0 croati0 with TOP yrlppt 2�O� id�e�.GYopnet, C r
r
Figure 1. Approximate location of project area on USGS Creeds quadrangle.
The investigation was carried out in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended) and conducted in accordance with the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological Documentation. The report
describes fieldwork results and makes recommendations for further work.
This report contains a description of the project area's physical and environmental
setting, an outline of meaningful historical contexts for the property, a general research
design that summarizes field methods, previous research in the areftoidmpected results,
and finally, the survey results are described, the findings reviewed, and recommendations
J�.`:e 2 2 2013
5 DCM-MAD C1TY

explained. Field notes, artifacts, and other project records are presently being curated in
Circa—'s office in Williamsburg, Virginia. It is anticipated that all of these materials will
eventually be transferred to North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) in
Raleigh, North Carolina following the conclusion of the project.
At Circa—, Carol D. Tyrer served as Project Manager for the project. Dawn Frost served
as the Principal Investigator for the project, who was assisted in the field by Carol Tyrer.
Dawn M. Frost served as the Architectural Historian for the project and completed the
architectural survey and historic context. Dawn M. Frost and Carol D. Tyrer prepared the
report. The successful completion of the Phase I survey for the proposed development
was made possible by the contribution of many individuals. In particular, Kyle Spring
with Bowman Consulting ensured that project information and maps were always
available for the study.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The primary reasons for incorporating environmental studies into archaeological projects
are: to learn of possible environmental constraints or lack of constraints; to determine the
presence or absence of critical resources that might have influenced site distribution, etc;
and to discover environmental factors -- erosion, deposition, subsidence, and historic land
use patterns -- that might influence the integrity of archaeological sites once they have
formed. Keeping these objectives in mind, a brief environmental summary of the project
area is provided below.
The project tract is located is located in the tidewater region on the Coastal Plain of North
Carolina and is comprised of an overgrown field and with a fringe of hardwoods along
the north and south edges. A thick grove of trees is located in the northeastern section of
the project area. A single row of planted crepe myrtles screen the project area from
Marsh Causeway. Several cypress and other large hardwood trees are located near the
edge of North Landing River. A bulkhead and a boat landing is evident along the edge of
the river.
Elevations across the tract range from six feet above mean sea level (AMSL) near the
river bank to 10 feet AMSL in the center of the tract before it falls to seven feet AMSL
near Marsh Causeway. The site can be accessed via a gravel road off Marsh Causeway.
Aerial photos from the 1990s to the present show minor changes within the project area
during the last 20 years, although development has occurred around the project area
during this period (Figures 2 - 9). The quarry across Marsh Causeway was opened
sometime after 2006 and was in full operation by 2008.
RECEIVED
V<' 2 2 2013
ecsT-iCHD CITY
3

. .el—.— .-- . —.— ...... ... t.. j............. ......... ....... �.....a..........—
JAN `r, z 2313
-DcN-ren crry

Figure 4.
project area, taken from Google Earth.
Figure 5. 2003 aerial view of project area, taken from Google Earth.
RECEIVED
J�N222013
DC.M MI)CITY

•, U'
02
r
r
rY•
9 + e§�Fa15 h.y
- nio)9I:19mrnoa4glsmn•Ne'-
r
c earth
50n II O

yA ��TOP
!
i
l
W
BBftfl
Ev:,n es,n p
I i
4F:M'o Afll i95 nn7w.i, n f a:.4ns 1, ni RO'�fiC

soils
At least two different soil types and soil type variants exist within the East Point Estates
project area. These soil types and variants include Bojac loamy sand, 0% to 3% slopes
and Tomodey fine sandy loam (Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS] 2012).
Each of these types and variants are described below including references to drainage,
hunting and gathering potential, and horticultural and agricultural productivity potential.
Further, conclusions regarding the suitability of each for historic and Native American
occupation and archaeological site probability are also explained.
Soils maps and associated data provide an analysis of soil types within a geographic area.
Despite comprehensive and detailed coverage of most areas by soils surveyors,
researchers often miss microenvironments due to their small footprints. Unfortunately,
resource rich microenvironments were often common sites of cultural activity. As such,
this analysis of archaeological potential is a "best -guess" using the best available data.
Well -drained, agriculturally- and horticulturally -productive soils proximal to
transportation corridors -roads and rivers were the best choices for historic period
occupation. Secondary areas, such as those containing wet soils and acid soils, after
improvement such as drainage and liming also may have also been suitable choices for
historic occupation. No navigable waterways exist within the project area, thus water
travel is not a factor in the site probability analysis of this tract.
Areas of wet soils may have been attractive to Native American cultures. In these areas,
edible herbaceous plant species may have been gathered and faunal species browsing
these areas may have been hunted with success. Well -drained soils proximal to these
resource -rich areas may have made adequate hunting and gathering campsites where the
hunted and gathered resources were processed. These sites would have left an observable
archaeological footprint. Little archaeological evidence would be located within the wet
areas, the immediate locale of resource procurement.
Areas containing gravelly soils may have been especially attractive to stone tool -
manufacturing Native American cultures but the level of attraction may have depended
on the type and quality of the gravels available in these locations. Well -drained soils
proximal to quarry -able, gravel -rich areas would have made adequate lithic material
procurement campsites but in this case, archaeological materials may be located at both
the campsites and the quarry sites.
Soils Identified Within the Project Area
Bojac loamy sand, 0% to 3% slopes (BoA) is the primary soil identified within the
project area covering approximately 80% of the central portion of the project tract
(Figure 10). Tomotley fine sandy loam (To) is identified within the northern and
southeastern portions of the project area covering approximately 20% of the project tract.
RECESVED
JAN 22 "r013
DCM !1D CTTY
11

Figure 10. Project area soil map, from NRCS website.
Bojac Loamy Sand
Bojac loamy sand soil is a very -deep, well -drained, moderately -rapidly -permeable soil
that formed in loamy and sandy fluvial and marine sediments (NRCS 2012). This soil is
found on stream terraces and floodplains of the Coastal Plain. Solum thickness is 30
inches to 65 inches and depth to bedrock is over 60 inches in this extremely acid to
slightly acid soil. This soil also features a slow to medium surface runoff. This soil is
mostly cultivated and can support peanuts, soybeans, and corn. Where wooded, the soil
can support loblolly pine, sweet gum, oak, hickory, and maple.
Tomotley Complex
Tomotley complex soil is a very -deep, poorly -drained, moderately- to moderately -
slowly -permeable soil formed in loamy marine and fluvial sediments found on terraces of
the Coastal Plain (NRCS 2012). The solum thickness ranges from 30 inches to over 60
inches and depth to bedrock is over 60 inches in this extremely acid to moderately acid
soil. The content of rounded pebbled ranges from 0% to 5% throughout the solum and
some pedons have a few concentrations of ironstone. This soil features a slow surface
runoff. Mostly cultivated, this soil can support corn, soybeans, small grains, truck crops,
and pasture. Where wooded, the soil can support loblolly pine, willow oak, yellow
poplar, red maple, water tupelo, sweet gum, black gum, and water oak. Understory
species include inkberry, large gallberry, southern bayberry, switch cane, blueberry,
sweet bay, and American holly.
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
12
I)CM--LID MY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The following section provides the Native American and historic background information
necessary to assessing the archaeological potential of the proposed project area. Previous
investigations in the general vicinity of the project area are outlined, while specific
documents and resources employed in this survey are discussed.
Historic Context
Native American Sites Context
North Carolina's Native American cultural chronology, like that of the rest of the Middle
Atlantic region, is divided into three major periods, Paleoindian, Archaic, and Woodland,
with the differences defined largely on changes in subsistence practices, settlement
patterns, and types of material remains found. The three main periods reflect major
changes, while "Early", "Middle", and "Late" subperiods reflect less dramatic, though
significant, changes.
Paleoindian Period (Prior to 10,000 B.C.)
Paleoindian occupation in North Carolina, the first human occupation of the region,
began some time before 10,000 B.C. The earliest diagnostic artifacts where there is any
consensus are Clovis projectile points, which are typically fashioned of high -quality
cryptocrystalline materials such as chert, chalcedony, and jasper. Later Paleoindian
points include smaller Clovis -like and Cumberland variants, and small "Mid-Paleo"
points. In the southeastern part of the state, Dalton, Hardaway -Dalton, and Hardaway
side -notched points make up the later end of the Paleoindian period. Also diagnostic,
though to a lesser extent, are certain types of well -made endscrapers, sidescrapers, and
other formalized tools. Most current views now hold that eastern Paleoindians were
generalized foragers with an emphasis on hunting. Social organization apparently
consisted of relatively small bands that exploited a wide but defined territory.
Isolated projectile point finds and what appear to be small temporary camps represent the
majority of Paleoindian remains in North Carolina. Although some larger and very
notable base camps are present in the state, they are relatively rare and usually associated
with sources of preferred high quality lithic materials. Two of the most important
Paleoindian sites in the eastern United States have been identified in nearby Virginia.
These include the Thunderbird Site in the Shenandoah Valley (Gardner 1974, 1977) and
the Williamson Site in south-central Virginia (McCary 1951, 1975). Both are large base
camps associated with nearby sources of high-grade cryptocrystalline lithic materials. At
the Thunderbird site area and its surrounding environs, a site typology has been
formulated to include lithic quarries, quarry -related base camps, quarry reduction
stations, base camp maintenance stations, outlying hunting sites, and isolated point sites
(Gardner 1981, 1989).
One of the earliest dated sites in North America, Cactus Hill lies in the Coastal Plain
along the Nottoway River in nearby Sussex County, Virginia RNvoy and McAvoy
JAN 2 2 2013
13 DCM-h4HDC1TY

1997). Although still controversial, Cactus Hill appears to have the potential to become
one of the most well accepted pre -Clovis sites in the western hemisphere.
Within North Carolina, the Hardaway site (31sT4) is the most significant Paleoindian site
identified. This site is situated on the Yadkin River in the Uwharrie Mountains and forms
the base for the Paleoindian and Early Archaic subperiod sequences defined by Coe (Coe
1964).
There are concentrations of Paleoindian materials in North Carolina and, conversely,
there are areas where sites and isolated finds of this early period are all but absent making
Paleoindian sites far less common than all other periods of Native American prehistory.
The fact that sea level rises during this period inundated much of the North Carolina
coastline further hinders the identification of Paleoindian sites as it is possible that many
of these sites are now submerged (Phelps 1983). While the chances of finding remains
from this early period within the project area are considered low, any well -drained
location, particularly where tributaries converge, is a high potential location for Native
American camps and settlements in general. Therefore, considering there are several
tributaries around the project area, it is possible that a site or isolated find of this period
could be discovered within the project area, even though the chances are considered low.
Archaic Period (8,000 B.C. —1,200 B.C.)
The beginning of the Archaic period generally coincides with the end of the Pleistocene
epoch, marked in this region by a climatic shift from a moist, cool period to a warmer,
dryer climate. Vegetation also changed at this time from a largely boreal forest setting to
a mixed conifer -deciduous forest. In eastern North Carolina, a temperate climate was
established (Dent 1995). Researchers believe that increasing differences in seasonal
availability of resources brought on by post -Pleistocene changes coincide with increasing
emphasis on strategies of seasonally geared mobility.
A band -level social organization involving seasonal movements corresponding to the
seasonal availability of resources and, in some instances, shorter -interval movements is
thought to primarily characterize Archaic populations. Settlement during the Archaic
period probably involved the occupation of relatively large regions by single band -sized
groups, living in base camps during part of the year and dispersing on an as -needed or
seasonal basis, creating smaller microband camps, possibly consisting of no more than
single families.
The development of more specialized resource procurement activities as well as the
technology to accomplish these activities also characterizes the Archaic period. These
differences in the material culture are believed to reflect larger, more localized
populations and changes in methods of food procurement and processing.
Comer and side notching became a common characteristic of projectile points at the
beginning of the Archaic period (Early Archaic subperiod), indicating changes in hafting
technology and possibly the invention of the spear -thrower (atlatl). Notche
include Palmer and Kirk corner -notched and, in localized areas, various side-notc ed
.JAN 2 2 2913
14
DIM -MID ^.:Tf

forms. A series of bifurcate base forms marked the later end of the Early Archaic
subperiod and the beginning of the Middle Archaic subperiod. The Middle Archaic
subperiod, ca. 6,500 B.C. - 3,000 B.C. sees the rise of various stemmed projectile point
forms. In this area of eastern North Carolina, the most common Middle Archaic forms
would be Stanly, Morrow Mountain, and Guilford types, followed by the side -notched
Halifax type at the end of the subperiod and the transition into the Late Archaic subperiod
between ca. 3,500 B.C. and 3,000 B.C. Stemmed and notched forms, including various
large, broad -bladed stemmed knives and projectile points (e.g., Savannah River and
variants) dominated the Late Archaic subperiod. These forms generally diminish in size
by the succeeding Early Woodland subperiod. Also found, though more rarely along the
margins of the Great Dismal Swamp (to the northwest of the project area), are stemmed
and notched -stem forms like those generally associated more prominently with areas of
Pennsylvania and adjoining parts of the northeast (Perkiomen).
The Archaic period also marks the beginning of ground stone technology, with the
occurrence of ground atlatl weights and celts. New tool categories developed during the
Archaic period include chipped- and ground -stone celts, ground -stone net sinkers,
pestles, pecked stones, mullets, and axes. Vessels carved from steatite are found on sites
dating to the end of the Late Archaic subperiod.
Marked increases in population density and decreased mobility characterize the Late
Archaic subperiod in eastern North America (4,000 B.C.-1,200 B.C.). Because
population growth necessitated a larger and more predictable food supply, agriculture
probably has its origins in the Middle Atlantic region during this subperiod. Yarnell
(1976), for example, writes that sunflower, sump weed, and possibly goosefoot may have
been cultivated as early as 2,000 B.C. In the lower Little Tennessee River Valley,
remains of squash have been found in Late Archaic Savannah River contexts (ca. 2,400
B.C.), with both squash and gourd in slightly later Iddins period contexts (Chapman and
Shea 1988).
Most likely, Middle and Late Archaic subperiods would be the most common types of
Archaic sites found in and around the project area. Middle and Late Archaic campsites
are common in the Coastal Plain, and the project area was viewed as having a moderate
potential for the location of Middle to Late Archaic components representing small
group, transient campsites. In most cases, such sites would not likely have National
Register of Historic Places significance unless preserved features and/or unplowed
subsurface deposits were present.
Woodland Period (1,200 B.C. -A.D. 1600)
Ceramic technology, a gradually developing dependence on horticulture, and increased
sedentism characterized the Woodland period. Three subperiods (Early, Middle, and
Late Woodland) have been designated, based primarily on stylistic and technological
changes in ceramic and projectile point types as well as settlement patterns.
Not all researchers agree on the temporal brackets for the Early and MiiW9odland
subperiods. Some use the southeastern chronology where the Early Woo and subperiod
JAN 2 2 2013
15 !?CNr-?, HD CITY

begins ca. 1,000 B.C. and lasts to ca. A.D. 200/300. This chronology may be applicable
to the southwestern portion of the state, though not to the Piedmont or Coastal Plain.
Gardner (1982) initially formulated the most widely used temporal scheme in the Middle
Atlantic and the one that is probably most applicable to the project area noting Early
Woodland, ca. 1,200 B.C. - 500 B.C.; and Middle Woodland, ca. 500 B.C. - A.D. 900.
Others elaborated on the scheme based on both artifact styles and, of perhaps more
significance, perceived settlement shifts.
The appearance of ceramics in the archaeological record generally defined the Early
Woodland subperiod, bracketed herein at ca. 1,200 B.C. - 500 B.C. The earliest
Woodland ceramic wares, Marcey Creek Plain and variants, are rectangular or oval and
resemble the preceding Late Archaic soapstone vessels. In this area, these ceramics are
rare and appear to be, in part, contemporaneous with similar flat -bottom vessels tempered
with grog, sand, and, in some cases, shell. Variously tempered beaker -shaped vessels as
well as those having more conventional sub -conical shapes follow these forms.
Complexity of and emphasis on ceremonial aspects, especially those concerned with the
burial of the dead, are also characteristic of the Early Woodland subperiod across a broad
region of the east. In North Carolina, this emphasis is not seen until about 500 B.C. when
stone and earth burial cairns and cairn clusters occur in the western part of the state;
however, in spite of the mention of such mounds in both oral tradition and in older
publications, most researchers generally accept that this phenomenon did not extend into
the Coastal Plain.
Gardner's model indicates that, around the overall project area, large and intensively
occupied sites interpreted as sedentary (as opposed to seasonal) large group base camps
are located in the estuarine zone/shoreline with smaller, short-term support camps located
in the estuarine zone and throughout the freshwater tributary network. It is during this
time that shell middens appear, indicating shellfish were an important part of the
subsistence focus at this time (Gardner 1982). The succeeding Middle Woodland
subperiod sees the most intensive use of these resources, and middens of this period are
generally both larger and more abundant at this time.
The appearance of net -marked and corded pottery that is sand -tempered, sand -and
crushed -rock -tempered, and gravel -tempered marked the Middle Woodland subperiod in
this area, defined herein between ca. 500 B.C. and A.D. 900. These types generally span
the subperiod ca. 500 B.C. to A.D. 300, and are slightly overlapped in time by, and
replaced with, the shell -tempered Mockley ware from slightly before ca. A.D. 200 to
about A.D. 900 throughout the region.
By the Late Woodland subperiod (A.D. 900-1600), agriculture had' assumed a role of
major importance in the Native American subsistence system. The adoption of
agriculture represents a major change in the Native American subsistence economy and
settlement patterns. Expanses of arable land became a dominant settlement factor, and
sites were located on fertile floodplain soils or, in many cases, on higj���ces or
ridges adjacent to them. During this period, shell middens are still use ut t e large
JU 2 2 2013
16
MI-MIM CITY

habitation sites are not necessarily correlated with them. The location of Early to Middle
Woodland shell middens are often re -used but mainly as short-term foray sites (Gardner
1982).
By the time of initial European exploration, most of the Native American groups in the
Coastal Plain shared a common culture and were subsumed within an emerging
paramount chiefdom under the domain of one paramount chief, Powhatan. Some groups
were direct components of the chiefdom, while others, usually those most distant, were at
least allied in some manner with the paramount group (Rountree 1989).
Diagnostic artifacts of the Late Woodland subperiod include several triangular projectile
point styles that originated during the later part of the Middle Woodland subperiod.
These styles decreased in size through time, and eventually culminated in the very small
and often serrated triangles typically found on the most recent Late Woodland and early
contact period villages. Late Woodland subperiod ceramics in this area include shell -
tempered Townsend and Roanoke Simple Stamped types, along with plain -surfaced,
shell -tempered variants. By the time of European contact, the most common pottery type
in the area appears to have been Roanoke Simple Stamped and plain variants.
Settlements dating to this time consist of both villages and small hamlets. Some villages
were highly nucleated, while others were internally dispersed over a wide area. Some
were completely fortified by circular or oval palisades, while others contained a fortified
core area and outlying houses, indicating a rise in intergroup conflict. The more
dispersed villages and hamlets were scattered over a wide area with indications of
internally fluid settlement within a loosely defined town or village territory.
Drawings and journals of early European explorers describing Indian villages indicate
that houses were constructed of an oval, rectangular, or circular framework of flexible
green sapling poles set in the ground, lashed together, and covered with thatch or bark
mats. Burial sites of the period were situated in individual pits or in ossuaries. Such
historical accounts are consistent with data obtained from archaeological excavations of
Late Woodland to early historic village sites (Hodges and Hodges 1994).
With the development of a more sedentary settlement -subsistence system culminating in
the Late Woodland subperiod, permanent habitation sites gradually replaced base camp
habitation sites more characteristic of those of the previous foragers and hunter -gatherers.
Various supporting camps and activity areas were established in the day-to-day
procurement of food and other resources (i.e., short-term hunting and foraging camps,
quarries, butchering locations, and re -tooling locations). Locations used partially or
largely for ceremonial purposes were also present, usually in association with habitation
sites.
The large base camps, hamlets, and villages are typically located on bluffs, terraces, or
high floodplains adjacent to rivers or major tributaries. Small seasonal camps and non -
seasonally based satellite camps supporting nearby sedenta%Afges and hamlets are
located along smaller streams in the interior. Limited concentrations and sparse scatters
J01 2 2 2913
17 CC:TY

of lithics and ceramics typically characterize these campsites. As indicated earlier,
shellfish -gathering sites and shell middens suggest ephemeral re -use of the earlier
middens.
Historic Context
The first European exploration of the area now known as Currituck occurred in 1584 as
Sir Walter Raleigh received a patent from the British Crown and set out to explore the
New World. He would obtain two other patents in 1585 and 1587 for the same area. The
first two voyages were largely exploratory, but the third included women and children
who were to populate a permanent English colony on Roanoke Island. A year later,
Captain Vincente Gonzales and Juan Menendez -Marques visited the area (McCartney,
1997). These men, Spaniards under the direction of the Florida government, set out to
find Sir Walter Raleigh's colonists. They sailed up the west shore of the Chesapeake Bay
and then traced the west coast of the Eastern Shore of Virginia and part of North
Carolina. Although the men did not find the Roanoke colony, they did open the area for
other colonists to follow. Soon after, another group of Spanish explorers landed and
claimed Currituck Beach for Spain (Snowden 1995). However, Knotts Island, to the
northeast of the project area, became the first area permanently settled by tobacco farmers
moving south from Virginia.
In 1663, King Charles II, under the Carolina Charter, granted eight men a vast tract
known as Carolina. These Lord Proprietors would go on to set up a government
establishing the inhabited part of their tract as the County of Albemarle by 1668. That
same year, the men divided the County into precincts including Currituck, Pasquotank,
Perquimans, and Chowan (Snowden 1995). Although the line dividing Virginia and
North Carolina had been established in the land grant, by 1665, the line had moved 35
miles to the north giving North Carolina control over the earliest settlers already occupied
lands on the Albemarle Sound.
Communication and transportation throughout these early settlements relied heavily on
water and the area quickly became dependent on the waterways as avenues for commerce
(Jordan, 1974). Currituck became one of five ports operating in North Carolina during
this period. Merchants used the Currituck Inlet, just south of the Virginia/North Carolina
line and east of the project area, for shipping their goods. Maps drawn during this period
indicate the port but show no development within the project area (Figures 11, 12, and
13). However, by the time of the American Revolution, the port had begun to dwindle,
finally closing in 1828 (Snowden 1995). Maps of the area drawn in 1770 and 1775
clearly show the port, with no development within the project area at this time (Figures
14 and 15).
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-MAD CITY
18

Approximate-_-
projectlocation �" �""r'"�`'�'. �•
C' 'Powpie
i
C}/P�
N
o N n•+ i -
"b,
'fit •
Cry`°ll ;t L,,1;� .� Ilk K,
C A acA,vi,
�(�, &
FE
�r� a
r71�.ero, nab $: _ �•� Map notto scale
Figure 11. Detail of 1709 Lawson Map From Francis L. Hawks' Hi,rory of North
Carolina from 1663 to 1729, Vol. II. E. J. Hale & Son: 1858. REC- -D
2 2 2C13
DOvINHIli) CITY
19

I -
Figure 12. Detail of Northern Part of the Map of the Province of North Carolina 1730 by
H. Moll.
Figure 13. Detail of 1744 Map of Lord Carteret's Grant.
i�,i+ � i Z013
20
DCM ARD CITY

7" IG1iQ'OC�
J
i
a 00a,
Revs �1
U I 13
pero�
\'ewCurr tuckl 1.
UI.
�Ian�e�I�
1
IT
�, bock 00./ `}• 1 {'14,1 r
M 1,
Map notto scale
Figure 14. Detail of A Compleat Map of North -Carolina From an
Collett, 1770.
Approximate
project location
7
I'I1wee S nd IIlll
Survey, by John
RECEIVED
JAN 22 2"13
21 DCML v 'T) CTy

1Qn na[i6 atn e- _ • - . - . - -:ArA.. .4w' A4C
Figure 15. Detail of An Accurate Map of North and South Carolina with their
Frontiers, Shewing in a distinct manner all the Mountains, Rivers, Swamps, Marshes,
Bays, Creeks, Harbours, Sandbanks and Soundings on the Coasts; with The Roads and
Indian Paths; as well as The Boundary or Provincial Lines, The Several Townships and
other divisions of the Land In Both the Provinces, 1775. By Henry Mouzon, Jr.
Indian
V r
Although farms did populate the area during the 1700s, the County continued to function
as a minor port and trade center throughout the 18`' century. During the Revolutionary
War, Currituck County witnessed raids on the beach and port areas as the residents
worked to make supplies for the Continental Army.
After the Revolutionary War, Currituck County and the port saw a slowed growth and by
1828 the port closed. This single event wiped out much of the food supply for the
County as the Sound changed from a salt water to fresh water environment essentially
ending the shellfish population, a major food source for the region. However, this change
also created an environment that led to the development of ell -grass, wild cherry, and
other plants that provided a refuge for a large number of waterfowl that would play a
major role in the County's history after the Civil War. A amp drawn of the area shortly
before the port closed shows the area as sparsely population with no development within
the project area (Figure 16).
RECEIVED
Vr;222013
22 DC !- ,'LD n Ty

b 3
amHr.! G./ I
� •r
Approximate
projectiocatlon
q� J
,.\ s
mmilOMS I�.P tV•e..I • �it.
Figure 16. Detail of 1808 Map by John Price & John Strothers
By the turn of the 19th century, Currituck became known for fishing villages and gained a
reputation as a sportsman's paradise (Currituck County, no date). Wealthy industrialists
soon learned of the area's natural resources and began to build hunt clubs across the
County. However, the Civil War would halt much of this construction.
At the beginning of the Civil War, both the Union and Confederate armies eyed the Great
Dismal Swamp to the northwest of the project area and the newly opened Albemarle and
Chesapeake Canal. In addition to the Great Dismal Swamp serving as part of the
Underground Railroad before and during the war, both armies knew that control of the
canals and locks were important if they wanted to control the Albemarle Sound, Hampton
Roads, and the Gosport Naval facility. However, both canals remained under Union
control for most of the war (Gray and Pape, Inc. 2009, Brown 1981). Union forces
invaded the Carolina coast early on in the war capturing Fort Hatteras and Fort Clark on
the Outer Banks. In February 1862, they captured Roanoke Island, which became the
key to the North Carolina eastern river system. A map of the area drawn during the Civil
War shows no development with the project area (Figure 17).
Although the Civil War devastated North Carolina killing thousands of male residents
and damaging cities and transportation corridors, Currituck recovered quickly due in part
to their agriculture and duck hunting industries (Snowden 1995). By the 1880s, the area
was known as the premiere duck hunting region of the east coast. However, no towns or
municipalities developed and the areas continued to remain sparsely populated, A map of
the area drawn just after the turn of the 26h century clearly shows little development in
the area and no development within the project area (Figure 18). JAN 22 2013
23 DCM-MOCTfY

FfY
%f OfMf[ XJe�
u d,gIMA
Psnhn na
Approximate luwn
(sntrnoe projectlocatio AM 0 9tt
Ilnnv4ar..
A'na.i�M�1 �t�"i: �91W pNNe
otsMA, r � GSdt♦
\`��Rxn....rf. SWAMP
to scalel
Figure 17. Detail of S.E. portion of Virginia and N.E. portion of N'th Carolina drawn b.
Serg't Ch. Worret ; & compiled under the direction of Col. T.J. Cram, Chief Top'l Eng'r
Dep't Va. 1860s.
a� \� Approximate
project location
.. -fit_ ...c .•� L;
F �
C-
Mao sotto scale
Figure 18. Detail of 1921 Map of Currituck County that ran in The Indepent(rh{ifti¢ay,
January 6, 1922; pg. 11.
lAM 2 2 201
24

During the latter half of the 20t° century tourism began to replace hunting and fishing as
the primary industry in Currituck County. Today, the area continues to flourish as a
small area with tourists coming to the Outer Banks and other areas.
Property History
Prior to 1941, J. C. Carson owned the property (Table 1). When he passed away he left
the land to Annie L. Heistand. She died in February 1941 and left the land to her niece
Bessie S. Gibney and her nephew Robert B. Stevens. The deed for this transaction noted
that there was a cemetery site situated on the tract. The deed further noted that the
grantee was to provide perpetual care for the cemetery and keep it clean and clear of
weeds. Gibney and Stevens retained the property until November 1960 when they sold it
to the Baptist Council of Norfolk. They retained the property until October 2006 when
they sold it to Currituck 34, L.L.C, who is listed in the Currituck County real estate
records as the current owners of the property.
Table 1. Deed Research for East Point Estates Tract.
Grantor
Grantee
Book/Page
Date
Baptist Council of Norfolk
Currituck 34, L.L.C.
Deed Book
10/5/2006
969/863
Bessie and Frederick Gibney and
Baptist Council of Norfolk
Deed Book 951133
11/28/1960
Robert Stevens
Annie L. Heistand
Bessie S. Gibney and Robert
Will Book 6/537
2/11/1941
Stevens
Previously Recorded Cultural Resources
Circa— performed an archival search for East Point Estates tract using the both the
Virginia (VDHR) online Data Sharing System (DSS) and the North Carolina Office of
State Archaeology records on May 22, 2012. This research was completed to determine
if historic resources exist within the project area boundaries. The search identified two
archaeological resources and three architectural resources within a one -mile radius of the
project area boundaries. Table 2 lists all of the resources within one mile of the project
area boundaries. Figure 19 shows the approximate project area boundaries (yellow
shaded area) and resources within close proximity. Any resources colored turquoise on
the map are within one mile of the project area boundaries. Of the resources identified,
no archaeological resources and no architectural resources were identified within the
project area.
Table 2. Resources Within a One -Mile Radius of Proiect Area Boundaries
Survey Number I Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information I Recommendation
Archaeological Resources
31CK67
Archaic
Limited activity area and
Phase I survey
Recommended not
Woodland
domestic site, 50,000 square
7/28/92
eligible 7/28/92
181^ century
meters
19e century
201^ century
31CK198
20thcentury
Domestic site, 25,001 to 50,000
Phase I survey
Recommended not
square meters
2008
eligible 2008D
JP, I L,13
25 DCM ?AHD CITY

Survey Number I Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information I Recommendation
Architectural Resources
134-0169
ca.1880
Helms Place, located on
Phase II survey
VDHR determined
Princess Anne Road, site
1993
not eligible 7/17/97
includes one house, four sheds,
one barn, and one kitchen
134-0712
ca.1920
House,100 Princess Anne Road
Phase I survey
None made
1993
134-0713
ca. 1920
House, 144 Princess Anne
Phase I survey
None made
Road, site includes one house,
1993
one barn, and one shed
1134-0713
-
1 ry J 134.0712 --
CVeKI'NCK CO 1 , -
�;. �•?;222g13
c
31CK198
10 31CK67 ,1� .'� -
�f
marl64Sn1 n n h e tnrpmeum Netwvk
4e� �'it�?P BSl- Yno1R�3803 Ni�loial Gvt9n phi, �- ... ...J.
Figure 19. Resources within a one -mile radius of project area boundaries.
Archaeological Resource Potential
Native American Site Potential
One previously recorded Native American archaeological site is located within one mile
of the project area (Table 3, see Figure 19). This site dates to the Archaic period, the
Woodland period, and the 18t1i century, 19`s century, and 20"' century.
This site is classified as a limited activity area and a domestic site (31CK67). Lithic
artifacts recovered from this site include stone fragments, secondary debitage, bifaces,
and projectile points. Native American ceramic artifacts recovered from this site include
sand -tempered fabric -impressed sherds. This site is located in State fine sandy loam soils
26

and is situated approximately five feet AMSL on a low rise on a floodplain within a
cultivated area that has been heavily disturbed. The site is approximately 50,000 square
meters.
Given the project area's close proximity to the North River Landing and Currituck Sound
the possibility of finding Native American resources is considered moderate to high.
Although only one previously identified Native American archaeological site was located
within a mile of the project area, the project area conditions are ideal for small transient
Native American campsites. Given this information, it is possible that a Native American
site, most likely a temporary camp or lithic scatter could be found within the project area
boundaries. Given the previously identified site, this site would most likely date to the
general Native American period or Woodland period and would range in size from under
one acre to less than five acres. If a site was found within the project area, it would
probably not contain many Native American ceramic artifacts.
Historic Site Potential
Two previously recorded historic archaeological sites are located within one mile of the
project area (Table 4, see Figure 19). One site dates to the Archaic period, the Woodland
period, and the 181h century, 19`h century, and 201h century and one sites dates to the 20`h
century.
The Archaic period, Woodland period, 181h century, 19`h century, and 2dh century site is
classified as a limited activity area and a domestic site (31CK67). Historic ceramic
artifacts recovered from this site include ceramic sherds. Other historic artifacts
recovered from this site include glass fragments, wine bottle glass fragments, and brick
fragments. This site is located in State fine sandy loam soils and is situated
approximately five feet AMSL on a low rise on a floodplain within a cultivated area that
has been heavily disturbed. The site is approximately 50,000 square meters.
The 2Uh century site is classified as a domestic site (31CK198). Historic ceramic
artifacts recovered from this site include three pearlware sherds, one porcelain sherd, one
stoneware sherd, three whiteware sherds, and one earthenware sherd. Other historic
artifacts recovered from this site include two cellophane fragments, one penny, 21 iron
fragments, 16 plastic fragments, 10 brick fragments, one foil fragment, one light blue
glass fragment, one chicken bone fragment, two aqua window glass fragments, six aqua
bottle glass fragments, seven clear glass fragments, one window glass fragment, one soda
can, one iron hose clamp, four mortar fragments, six shingle fragments, one unidentified
fragment, one milky blue mason jar glass fragment, one fabric fragment, one nail, four
light blue plastic fragments, one iron machine cog, one pale green glass fragment, one
brown glass fragment, two glass fragments, six wire nails, one amethyst glass fragment,
one iron bolt, 30 aqua windshield glass fragments, two clear window glass fragments, one
steel washer, one shell fragment, and one black slag fragment. This site is located in
Altavista fine sandy loam soils and is situated approximately five feet AMSL on an
upland flat approximately 40 yards from the North Landing River. The site is
approximately 25,001 to 50,000 square meters. RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
27 DCM-MHDCITY

Table 3. Previously Identified Native American Sites Within One Mile of the Proiect Area.
Site
Number
Site
Chronoloov
Site Type
Native American Lithic
Artifacts
Native American
Ceramic Artifacts
Site Sae
Soil Type
Additional Site Information
31CK67
Archaic
Limited
Stone fragments,
Sand -tempered fabric-
50,000 square
State fine sandy
Site is situated
Woodland
activity area
secondary debitage,
impressed sherds
meters
loam
approximately five feet
1 Bt^ century
and domestic
bifaces, projectile points
AMSL on a low rise on a
19r' century
site
floodplain within a
201hcentury
cultivated area that has
been heavily disturbed
G `
n D
� Ztl
tz)
n
o
w
W

Given the project area's close proximity to the North River Landing and Currituck Sound
and the fact that there is an existing cemetery on the project tract, the possibility of
finding historic archaeological resources is considered moderate to high. Although only
two previously identified historic archaeological sites were located within a mile of the
project area, the project area conditions are ideal for a small homestead or domestic site.
Given this information, it is possible that a n historic archaeological site, most likely a
domestic site could be found within the project area boundaries. Given the previously
identified site, this site would most likely date to the general 19'h century or 20`h century
and would range in size from under one acre to less than five acres. If a site was found
within the project area, it would probably contain both ceramic and non -ceramic historic
artifacts.
METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
Research Strategy
The survey was designed to identify all cultural resources present in the project area and
to obtain sufficient information to make recommendations about the further research
potential of each resource based on potential eligibility to the National Register of
Historic Places. To accomplish this, both documentary research and archaeological field
testing was performed at a level in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards (Department of the Interior 1983, 48 FR 44720-44723), as well as NC SHPO
guidelines for Phase I archaeological surveys. Moreover, the field survey was conducted
in compliance with statutes regarding the impact of undertakings on historic properties as
summarized by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR 800 [1986]). To
meet,Advisory Council on Historic Preservation standards, a Phase I archaeological
survey must be conducted in "a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic
properties that may be affected by the undertaking" (36 CFR 800.4). The Phase I survey
was performed and documented at a level that meets or exceeds these standards.
A cultural resource is gauged to be significant if at least one of four National Register of
Historic Places criteria can be applied to it:
A. Associated with significant events in the broad patterns of national history;
B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past;
C. Representative of a type, period, or method of construction, or the work of
a master; and
D. Capable of yielding important information about the past.
Typically, Criterion D applies to archaeological sites. In order to be capable of yielding
important information about the past, generally a site must possess artifacts, soil strata,
structural remains, or other cultural features that make it possible to test historical
hypotheses, corroborate and amplify currently available information, or reconstruct the
sequence of the local archaeological record.
RECEIVED
is 2 2 2013
29 DCM-MHDCTTY

Table 4. Previously Identified Historic Archaeological Sites Within One Mile. of the Prnieot Arpa
Site
Number
Site
Chronology
Site Type
Historic Ceramic Artifacts
Other Historic Artifacts
-- --- ----- ---
Site Size
Sal Type
Additional Site Information
31CK67
Archaic
Limited
Ceramic sherds
Glass fragments, wine
50,000 square
State fine sandy
Site is situated
Woodland
activity area
bottle glass fragments,
meters
loam
approximately five feet
18th century
and domestic
and brick fragments
AMSL on a low rise on a
19t^ century
site
floodplain within a
20th century
cultivated area that has
been heavily disturbed
31CK198
201^ century
Domestic site
Three pearlware sherds,
Two cellophane
25,001 to 50,000
Altavista fine
Site is situated
one porcelain sherd, one
fragments, one penny,
square meters
sandy loam
approximately five feet
stoneware sherd, three
21 iron fragments, 16
AMSL on an upland flat
whiteware sherds, and
plastic fragments, 10
approximately 40 yards
one earthenware sherd
brick fragments, one
from the North Landing
foil fragment, one light
River
blue glass fragment,
one chicken bone
fragment, two aqua
window glass
fragments, six aqua
bottle glass fragments,
seven clear glass
fragments, one window
glass fragment, one
soda can, one iron
hose clamp, four
mortar fragments, six
shingle fragments, one
unidentified fragment,
one milky blue mason
jar glass fragment, one
Mfabric
fragment, one
n
nail, four light blue
plastic fragments, one
iron machine cog, one
pale green glass
fragment, one brown
30

Site
Number
Site
Chronology
Site Type
Historic Ceramic Artifacts
Other Historic Artifacts
Site Size
Soil Type
Additional Site Information
glass fragment, two
glass fragments, six
wire nails, one
amethyst glass
fragment, one iron boh,
30 aqua windshield
glass fragments, two
clear window glass
fragments, one steel
washer, one shell
fragment, and one
black slag fragment
�7
n
31

Methods
Archival Research
Archival research commenced with the examination of cartographic and historic works
that are on file online with the Library of Congress, the Colonial Williamsburg
Rockefeller Library, the North Carolina SHPO, and Currituck County. Efforts were
made to determine whether historic road right-of-ways passed close to the project area
and whether subsurface cultural deposits were likely to be present. Data accumulated
during the course of previous archival research on historic sites throughout the region
also were examined.
Architectural Field Methods
Field survey of all historic structures was conducted according to North Carolina SHPO's
survey procedures. A North Carolina SHPO site form was completed for each structure
or complex 50 years of age or older, and at least one black and white one photograph
taken, usually more.
Archaeological Field Methods
Prior to subsurface testing, the entire project area was visually inspected via pedestrian
survey and all above -ground evidence of cultural activity noted and recorded. Shovel
tests, approximately one -foot in diameter, were excavated at 50-foot intervals in areas of
high probability. In addition, shovel test intervals were reduced to 25-foot intervals
around positives and isolated positive shovel tests. Waterlogged areas, or portions of the
project area with slopes in excess of 15%, were carefully examined for cultural material,
but were not subjected to subsurface testing. All shovel tests were excavated according
to natural levels to sterile subsoil, and all soils screened through '/a -inch wire mesh.
Profiles were recorded for representative shovel tests and soil color recorded in
accordance with the Munsell classification system. All positive shovel tests were
recorded on standard field forms and all cultural material retained.
Laboratory Methods
Once removed from the field, all archaeological data and specimens were transported to
Circa—'s laboratory for processing and analysis. Prior to washing, artifacts from a given
provenience were first emptied into a screened basket and sorted. Items determined to be
unstable will be either dry brushed or in some cases not washed and re -bagged with the
appropriate provenience information. These items may include unstable organic objects,
such as wood or other plant material, leather, bone, fabric, metal requiring immediate
conservation, and overglaze painted delftware, and other soft -bodied ceramics such as
some local wares. Stable objects will be washed with a soft brush and edges of ceramics
and glass will be thoroughly cleaned to aid in the identification of body type and
mending. Items will be then placed by provenience on a drying rack.
In a given provenience, artifacts were sorted first by material and checked for mends.
Stylistic attributes were described with current terminology and recorded by count into a
database for analysis. Non -diagnostic artifacts with like attributes will be grouped
together - i.e., clear, amber, etc. bottle body glass fragments, unrecogpizable nail
.i"'v 2 2 2013
32
DCM-MIND CITY

fragments, corroded metal fragments, and aqua window glass. Diagnostic artifacts were
sorted and grouped together based on type or ware and/or vessel or function.
RESULTS OF SURVEY
The purpose of the field survey is to provide specific information concerning the location,
nature, and distribution of archaeological resources within the permit areas. Circa- uses
three types of designations for the grouping of archaeological resources: isolated finds
and sites. An isolated find is defined when a limited number of artifacts are recovered
from the ground surface or from shovel testing. This event may be either a casual or
single -episode discard such as a projectile point or a bottle break or may be a small
collection of artifacts related to various time periods, such as a projectile point from the
Woodland period and a bottle fragment from the 20'h century. A location is a grouping of
modern artifacts usually associated with a mid to late 20"' century standing structure. An
archaeological site is defined as a grouping of artifacts that date to specific periods and
that reveal the location of human activity and land use.
Architectural Resources
Within the project area boundaries, there is one ca. 1985 camp complex with one
house/clubhouse, one concrete pad, one gazebo, three pavilions, one dock and bulkhead,
two ruins, one shed, and one ca. 1916 cemetery (Figure 20). This complex is located
primarily in the western portion of the project area adjacent to the river in a clearing
surrounded by overgrown vegetation. The thick vegetation has begun to overtake some
of the building within the complex making it difficult to discern specific construction
materials in some instance. The complex is set on a relatively level grade that slopes
gently toward the river. A review of historic maps and the Currituck County real estate
records indicates that this complex was constructed in the mid 1980s. Given the
construction materials and style of the buildings, it would appear that this date is
accurate. From 1960 to 2006, the Baptist Council of Norfolk owned the property. It is
possible that this complex represents a reuse of existing structures into a camp
constructed by the Council to be used as a retreat and/or recreation area. The cemetery;
however, dates to the early 201" century and therefore predates the complex. The
cemetery most likely represents a small family cemetery of the previous owners of the
property.
Camp Complex
House/Clubhouse
This ca. 1985, one-story, multiple -bay, side -gable, concrete block building rests on a
concrete block foundation (Plate 1). The roof is covered in asphalt shingles. No
windows are visible on the building. The entrance on the building is not visible. There is
a one-story, one -bay, shed roof, wood -frame addition attached to the side (west) elevation
resting on a concrete block foundation. The addition has one exterior end Flemish bond
chimney (Plate 2). The rest of the addition is not visible due to ovffgf,?&p vegetation.
JAN 22 2�13
33 DCM-MHD CITY

Fn:haede,�ica� i' P�Yihogfk4 �
C�ocWW,lkh sai, .. .�
aann:,.a ",sa,o a 'M
Shed
�©Cemsta y "
e` dtyr'
"uw, * -"*
Projectarea

}d.
Plate 2.
Concrete pad
To the southeast of the house, there is a ca. 1985, rectangular poured concrete pad (Plate
3). The pad is situated in a small clearing surrounded by overgrown vegetation.
Plate 3. View of concrete pad, looking south.
35

Gazebo
To the southeast of the house, there is a ca. 1985 one-story, one -bay, pyramidal roof,
wood -frame gazebo that is open on all sides (Plate 4). The foundation is not visible due
to overgrown vegetation. The roof is covered in wood shingles. The corners of the roof
are supported by square wood posts painted white.
Plate 4. View of gazebo, looking southwest.
Pavilion #1
To the southwest of the house, there is a ca. 1985 one-story, one -bay, side -gable, wood -
frame pavilion that is open on all sides and rests on a poured concrete pad foundation
(Plate 5). The roof is covered with asphalt shingles with overhanging eaves on the fagade
slope. The corners of the roof are supported by Flemish bond square columns. The roof
line on both the fagade and rear (south) elevation is supported by three square wood posts
appointed white with two Flemish bond square columns in between.
Dock and Bulkhead
To the west of the house, there is a ca. 1987 wood dock leading into the river (Plates 6
and 7). The dock is supported by wood piers. Two wooden boat slips are situated at the
end of the dock supported by wood piers. Along the shoreline there is also a ca. 1987
wooden bulkhead consisting of vertical and horizontal wood supports. One set of wood
stairs flanked by wood railings lead from the bulkhead into the river. A boat ramp is
evident on the northern section of the shoreline. RECENE>S
' N 22 2013
36

Plate 5. View of pavilion #1, looking northwest.
Plate b. v mw ui umn, iuuuug cast.
37 T) nm-,,a<n c.Tv

Plate 7
. v inw ul owxneau, iuuxing nuruieasi.
Ruins #1
To the south of the house, there is a pile of construction debris consisting of plasterboard,
wood pallets, nails, and wood framing (Plate 8). It appears that this represents the
remains of a small building associated with the camp complex.
Plate 8. view or rum rri, iooxmg normwesi.
M.

Ruins #2
To the south of the house, there is a pile of construction debris consisting of plasterboard,
wood pallets, nails, and wood framing (Plate 9). The remains of a side -gable roof rest on
top of the debris. It appears that this represents the remains of a small building associated
with the camp complex.
Pavilion/shed #2
To the southeast of the house, there is a ca. 1985, one-story, one -by, flat roof, wood -
frame pavilion/shed open on all sides and resting on the ground (Plate 10). The roof is
covered in asphalt shingles and is supported by square wood posts.
Pavilior✓shed #3
To the southeast of the house, there is a ca. 1985, one-story, one -by, flat roof, wood -
frame pavilion/shed open on all sides and resting on the ground (Plate 11). The roof is
covered in asphalt shingles with overhanging eaves and is supported by square wood
posts.
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
I&S

Shed
To the northeast of the house, there is a ca. 1985, one-story, one -bay, front -gable, wood -
frame shed clad in vertical wood siding (Plate 12). The foundation is not visible due to
overgrown vegetation. The roof is covered in asphalt shingles. No windows are visible
on the shed. The entrance on the shed is not visible.
Plate 12. View of shed, looking west.
Cemetery, North Carolina Site Number 31 CK235
To the east of the house, there is a small cemetery situated in a grove of trees and
overgrown vegetation (Plate 13). Only two markers were visible along with one smaller
boundary marker indicating the edge of the cemetery (Plates 14, 15, and 16). There is no
enclosure around the cemetery. The markers are relatively plain with no other detail or
ornamentation beyond the inscriptions. One marker notes the grave of Sarah Cooper and
is inscribed with the following:
Sarah A. Cooper
Born Sep. 23, 1846
Died Oct. 23, 1916
At rest
RECEIVED
J; 2 2013
!)Cn ♦.,«D `!TS/
41

The other marker notes the grave of Sidney Cason and is inscribed with the following:
Sidney Gerald
Son of
B. F. & T. L. Cason
October 4, 1876
July 7, 1922
Plate 13. View of cemetery, looking, north.
REC6i MD
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM4AP.DCITY
42

Plate 14. View of cemetery marker, detail, looking west.
JAN 2 2 2013
DCtiI',T,D C'TY 43

Plate 16. View of cemetery boundary marker, detail, looking northeast.
Archaeological Resources
Circa— staff excavated 50 shovel tests across the project tract with the majority of shovel
tests clustered on the slight high ridge in the center of the tract near the cemetery and
along the edge of the river (Figure 21). Shovel tests 1 through 31 were located in the
overgrown grassy field. These shovel tests revealed only minor variation in thickness
and expression of horizons, and there was typically little difference between profiles
recorded in these shovel tests (Plate 17). The strata represent differences in color and, in
some cases, textures, and are mainly the product of post -depositional color enhancement
and other effects of soil formation that is continually taking place in these more -or -less
stabilized alluvial deposits, or possibly by the level of saturation within the soil on the
low areas.
RECEIVED
i,N222013
DCrvI-WID CITY
Frei

OO i
L 0 O a
0 •p
Oa 0 0
k V.s OQ O O O O.
�t 0- 0
0 O
° 0 0 O 0 0"
0 0 0
• 0
0 00 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O • • 0
O
01
•
• • • O Negative shoveltest
• • Positive shovel test �1 ��„��•
Project area boundaries

Stratum A, lying under an inch or two of recent root mat and humified organic matter, is
a dark, plowed topsoil or "A" horizon. This horizon has developed naturally from the
accumulation of organic materials, additives from farming such as lime, manure, etc., and
the activities of plants, animals, insects, bacteria, etc. in a once plowed turbulent
environment. Stratum A consisted of a dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) older plowzone
and ranged in depth from 0.76 feet to 1.20 feet thick (Figure 22). In addition, in some
shovel tests this horizon could be subdivided based on minor color gradations, for
example, a one -chip lowering or increasing of value or chroma on Munsell readings. The
underlying horizon or subsoil, Stratum B, was a very uniform darker yellowish brown
sandy clay.
Figure
ST 4 ST 24
0' 0'
5' .S
1.0' 1.0'
A = Dark grayish brown A= Dark grayish brown
(1 CYR 4/2) older plowzone (10YR4/2)older plowzona
Subsoil= Darker yellowish Subsoil= Darker yellowish
brown sandy clay brown sandy clay
ST 32 ST 49
01
0.
A'
.5' 5.
A
1.0' 1.0'
1.5' 1.5'
A= Degraded dark grayish brown A= Fill material
(10YR 4/2) older plowzone
Subsoil= Darker yellowish brown
sandy clay RECEIVED
22. Renresentative shovel test nrofiles
46 DCW- WDCITY

Shovel tests 32 through 50 were placed along the edge of the river bank around the
developed areas (Plate 18). These shovel tests showed that this area had been impacted
by the construction and razing of structures, roads, and utilities in the area. Stratum A
consisted of either a degraded Stratum A soil roughly 0.23 to 0.31 feet thick overlying
subsoil or a disturbed mix of Stratum A and B subsoil. Shovel tests 46 through 50 were
excavated on the west side of the gravel road in between the road and river. Shovel tests
showed that this area had been filled and subsoil was not reached. This fill probably was
soil from where the bank was cut back when the bulkhead and the cut from the boat
landing were constructed. The river bank on either side of the project area bulkhead is
low and slopes back gently to higher ground. The riverbank within the project area
appears have been filled in and built up to the level of the existing ground surface. A
review of the elevations shows that the river bank on either side of the project area is at
two feet AMSL and the river bank on the project site is at six feet AMSL.
Location 1
Twenty-one mid to late 20`h century artifacts were recovered from 12 positive shovel tests
located in this area. This material consisted of one clear bottle glass fragment, three aqua
window glass fragments, three wire nails, one fencing staple, one barbed wire fragment,
one bolt fragment, four aluminum foil fragments, one plastic -coated electrical wire
fragment, and six concrete block fragments. This material consistedftgfL4906s associated
with the structures in this area.
JAN 2 2 2013
47

Isolated Finds
Three isolated finds were recorded during the course of the Phase I testing. These finds
were all historic and dated to the 201h century.
IF-EP1
One isolated find was recovered from the eastern middle section of the project area near
Marsh Causeway at the edge of the field. This positive shovel test, 4, consisted of one
amber bottle glass fragment. The bottle glass fragment was from a beer container
manufactured in America circa post 1960 and is probably a casual discard from the road.
Radial shovel tests were excavated at 25-foot intervals to the north, south, east, and west;
all were negative. No further work is recommended for this isolated find.
IF-EP2
One isolated find was recovered from the eastern middle section of the project area near
Marsh Causeway at the edge of the field. This positive shovel test, 22, consisted of one
Coca-Cola bottle glass fragment. The bottle glass fragment was from a Coca-Cola bottle
manufactured in America circa post 1970 and is probably a casual discard. Radial shovel
tests were excavated at 25-foot intervals to the north, south, east, and west; all were
negative. No further work is recommended for this isolated find.
IF-EP3
One isolated find was recovered from the eastern middle section of the project area near
Marsh Causeway at the edge of the field. This positive shovel test, 24, consisted of one
7-UP bottle cap. Radial shovel tests were excavated at 25-foot intervals to the north,
south, east, and west; all were negative. No further work is recommended for this
isolated find.
SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Architectural Resources
The ca. 1985 camp complex is vacant and in various stages of disrepair. Further, because
the camp dates to the 1980s, it is not considered eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places. The cemetery dates to the early 201h century and is likely the
remains of a small family cemetery of the previous owners of the property. The project
design has been changed to preserving this resource in an open space. While the
cemetery does not appear to be potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places, Circa— does recommend that the site be marked in the field during
construction activities with orange safety fencing and identified on all project maps. If
the site cannot be avoided, Circa— would recommend that the cemetery be removed and
relocated. The location associated with this resource consisted of one clear bottle glass
fragment, three aqua window glass fragments, three wire nails, one fencing staple, one
barbed wire fragment, one bolt fragment, four aluminum foil fragments, one plastic -
coated electrical wire fragment, and six concrete block fragments. This material consisted
of debris associated with the structures in this area, and therefore also not considered
eligible for listing.
RECEIVED
48 JAN 2 2 2013
DCM•MHD CTTY

Isolated Finds
No further work is recommended for the three isolated finds and the location as they are
not considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Archaeological Resources
No new archaeological resources were identified during the course of this survey,
therefore Circa— recommends no further archaeological survey work within the project
area.
Table 5. Summary of identified resources and recommendations
Site
Type
National Register
Eligibility
Recommendation
IF-EPI
Isolated find
No
No further work
IF-EP2
Isolated find
No
No further work
IF-EP3
Isolated find
No
No further work
N/A
Camp complex, Location 1
No
No further work
31CK235
Cemetery
No
Avoidance
RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2013
DCM-P+:i:D CITY
99

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
1986 "36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties." Regulations of the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation Governing the Section 106 Review Process.
Anonymous
1744 Map of Lord Carteret's Grant.
1921 "Map of Currituck County," as run in The Independent Friday, January 6, 1922; pg.
11.
Brown, Alexander Crosby
1981 A History of the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal.
Chapman, Jefferson, and Andrea Brewer Shea
1988 "The Archaeobotanical Record: Early Archaic Period to Contact in the Lower
Little Tennessee River Valley." Tennessee Anthropologist VI (1).
Coe, Joffre L.
1964 "The Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont," Transactions of the
American Philosophical Society, 54(5).
Collett, John
1770 A Compleat Map of North -Carolina From an Actual Survey.
Cram, T. J.
1860s S.E. portion of Virginia and N.E. portion of N'th Carolina.
Currituck County, North Carolina
No date Deed, wills, inventories, surveyors records, plat books, tax assessors books,
land tax records, personal property tax records.
No date County History available online at www.co.currituck.nc.us/county-histor
Dent, Richard J., Jr
1995 Chesapeake Prehistory: Old Traditions, New Directions.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service
1983 Archaeology and Historic Preservation; Secretary of the Interior's Standards and
Guidelines. Federal Register 48:44716-44762.
1991 36 CFR Part 79: Curation of Federally -Owned and Administered Archaeological
Collections.
RECEIVED
iAN 22 2013
50
Try FJ)I L..i CITY

Gardner, William M.
1974 "The Flint Run Paleoindian Complex: A Preliminary Report 1971-1973 Seasons."
Occasional Publication No. 1, Archeology Laboratory
1977 "Flint Run Paleoindian Complex, its Implication for Eastern North American
Prehistory." In "Amerinds and Their Paleoenvironment in Northeastern North
America." edited by W. S. Mewman and B. Salwen, Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences.
1981 "Paleoindian Settlement Pattern and Site Distribution in the Middle Atlantic."
Anthropological Careers, edited by R. H. Landmine, L. A. Bennett, A. Brooks,
and P. P. Chock.
1982 "Early and Middle Woodland in the Middle Atlantic: An Overview." In
Practicing Environmental Archaeology: Methods and Interpretations, edited by
Roger W. Moeller, American Indian Archaeological Institute Occasional Paper
No. 3.
1989 "An Examination of Cultural Change in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene
(circa 9200 to 6800 B. C.)" In "Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis."
edited by J. Mark Wittkofski and Theodore R. Reinhart, Special Publication No.
19 of the Archeological Society of Virginia.
Gray and Pape, Inc.
2009 A Cultural Resources Reconnaissance (Phase 1A) Survey of City Park Site A, City
Park Site B and Hickory Middle School Site for the Dismal Swamp Ecosystem
Restoration Project in Chesapeake, Virginia.
Hawks, Francis L.
1709 History of North Carolina From 1663 to 1729, Vol.11.
Hodges, Mary Ellen N., and Charles T. Hodges, editors
1994 Paspahegh Archaeology: Data Recovery Investigations of Site 44JC308 at The
Governor's Land at Two Rivers, James City County, Virginia.
Jordan, James M. and Frederick S. Jordon.
1974 Virginia Beach A Pictorial History.
McAvoy, Joseph M., and Lynn D. McAvoy
1997 "Archaeological Investigations of Site 44SX202, Cactus Hill, Sussex County,
Virginia." Research Report Series No. 8, Virginia Department of Historic
Resources.
RECEIVED
McCartney, Martha.
1997 James City County Keystone of the Commonwealth. JAN 2 2 2013
DC-M-N1ID CITY
51

McCary, Ben C.
1951 "A Workshop of Early Man in Dinwiddie County, Virginia." American Antiquity
17(1).
1975 "The Williamson Paleoindian Site, Dinwiddie County, Virginia." The Chesopiean
13(3-4).
Moll, H.
1730 Northern Part of the Map of the Province of North Carolina.
Mouzon, Jr., Henry
1775 An Accurate Map of North and South Carolina with their Indian Frontiers,
Shewing in a distinct manner all the Mountains, Rivers, Swamps, Marshes, Bays,
Creeks, Harbours, Sandbanks and Soundings on the Coasts; with The Roads and
Indian Paths; as well as The Boundary or Provincial Lines, The Several
Townships and other divisions of the Land In Both the Provinces,
National Park Service
1990 National Register of Historic Places Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National
Register of Historic Places Criteria for Evaluation.
Natural Resources Conservation Service
2012 Online soils data. Available online at http://soils.usda.gov/.
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology
1994 Archaeological Site Form Handbook.
Phelps, David Sutton
1988 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Selected Portions of Gates, Camden,
and Currituck Counties.
Prince, John and John Strothers
1808 Untitled map.
Rountree, Helen C.
1989 The Termination and Dispersal of the Nottoway Indians of Virginia. Virginia
Magazine of History and Biography 95:195-200.
Snowden, Barbara
1995 "The History of Currituck County," Currituck Times.
Yamell, Richard A.
1976 "Early Plant Husbandry in Eastern North America." In Cultural Change and
Continuity: Essays in Honor of James Bennett Griffin, edited by Charles EhECEiVED
Cleland.
"1 2 2 2013
52 B^51-i/nD GTY

£S

APPENDIX A:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY
RECEIVED
3AN 2 2 2013
DCM-MHD CITY

I- ,
ARTIFACT INVENTORY
Site: Isolated rids
Recorder: C. Tyrer
Provience Quantity
Description
ST 4
1
IF-EPl
ST 22
1
1F-EP2
ST 23
1
IF-EP3
Location 1
ST 32
1
ST 34
1
1
ST 36
1
ST 38
1
ST 39
1
ST 40
1
1
ST 42
1
ST 44
1
1
ST 45
1
ST 46
3
ST 49
2
3
ST 50
1
Phase I
May 30, 2012
Bottle glass base fragment, amber
Bottle glass body fragment, aqua, Coke
Bottle cap, metal, printed 7-UP
Window glass fragment, aqua, 3/32" thick
Window glass fragment, aqua, 3/42" thick
Nail, wire, 2"L
Bolt fragment, iron
Nail, wire, 3" L
Staple, fencing
Bottle glass fragment, clear
Aluminum foil fragment
Concrete block fragment
Window glass fragment, aqua, 3/32" thick
Nail, wire, 3" L
Electric wire fragment, plastic coated
Concrete block fragments
Concrete block fragments
Aluminum foil fragments
Barbed wire fragment RECEI-VED
2 2 2�13
F'�-V"D G TY

I
���
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Braxton C. Davis Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
December 11, 2012
Bowman Consulting Group
CIO Brian Mesiti
1561 Bradford Rd., Suite 202
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
DEC 17 2o12
�'M'11g1p �y
Re: Currituck 34, LLC (East Point Estates) Major Permit Application
Dear Mr. Mesiti:
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application on
November 2, 2012 within the Morehead City office. It was then forwarded and received at the
Elizabeth City office on December 7, 2012, for State approval for the development of the
referenced project. An initial screening of the submittal package has been conducted. This
revealed certain deficiencies, which must be corrected before the application package can be
accepted as complete. To assist you in expediting the permitting process as much as possible, I
am notifying you of these deficiencies immediately so that they can be quickly corrected to
facilitate my detailed review.
I am returning the original application package so that the needed changes can be made, but will
retain a copy so that I can commence the detailed review. Please understand that the subsequent
detailed review may reveal additional areas where further information or documentation is
required to demonstrate compliance with the rules directly applicable to the proposed
development. If this occurs, you will be notified of such issues separately.
Our initial screening has identified the following deficiencies:
1. Not all questions on the application have been answered, or indicated as "not applicable."
Please address the following items:
■ Form DCM-MP-I:
- Number 4(f), please include all water -dependant structures such as piers,
bulkheads, boat ramps, etc... within the man-made features section.
- Number 4(k), an archaeological assessment was indicated as being
conducted. Please attach a copy of the results for review as indicated.
- Number 4(n), Please indicate if there are any existing septic systems
associated with the existing buildings or former camping areas.
- Number 4(o), please indicate if there are any existing wells on the
property.
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 ��n
e
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net hCarO/l/illa
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer A
N atura!!y

T
Bowman Consulting Group
C/O Brian Mesiti
December 11, 2012
Page 2
Number 5(d), according to the submitted site plan, there appears to be a
road that currently does not exist that will extend from the proposed Cul
De Sac Road to the existing boat ramp. If this road is proposed, please
include -within -this -section -(Also, -please -reflect- on-Form-DCM-MP-
(g)). If it is not proposed, remove it from the site plan.
Number 5(d), It is unclear if the septic and wells are proposed to be
installed at this time prior to the sale of the lots or after a lot is purchased
from the applicant. Please clarify. If they are to be installed prior to sale,
please show locations on the six lots that fall within CAMA jurisdiction.
Form DCM-MP-3:
Letter n, it has been indicated that water will not be impounded;
however, fire ponds are included as part of the proposed subdivision in
which storm water will be directed to. Please clarify.
2. Adequate Work Plans or Drawings have not been submitted. Please address the following
items:
■ When drawings are larger than 11 inches by 17 inches, 26 copies must be
provided. (It is recommended that 26 copies be provided after final approval of
Tans).
■ Each drawing must have a simple Title Block and it must:
- Provide the name of the Applicant
- Provide correct sheet numbers. (i.e. change wetland delineation to sheet
3 of 3)
A Plan View must be submitted that:
- Shows in detail all proposed development within the CAMA 75' AEC.
- Distinguishes between existing and proposed features; specifically
within the CAMA 75' AEC.
- Indicates all proposed and existing swales; specifically within the
CAMA 75' AEC. Based on the submitted site plan, it appears that no
swales will be within this area; however, within the application it is
mentioned several times that stormwater will discharge into the North
Landing River.
- Indicates the existing boat ramp
- Indicates Docks
- Indicates Piers
- Indicates Type and Location of Sewage Treatment
- Indicates Effluent Outlets
- Indicates approximate location of Normal Water Level
- Indicated Fire Pond 1
3. A Narrative Description of the proposed development was provided; however, please
include a section that details proposed development within the CAMA jurisdictional area
(i.e. grading, tree clearing, swales, road to boat ramp, etc...) Also, it appears that the fine
aggregate trail will go through the 404-wetland area located within the Pond 1 area.

r
1 Bowman Consulting Group
C/O Brian Mesiti
December 11, 2012
Page 3
Please indicate the dimensions and amount of fill material will be placed within the
wetland area. If the wetland area is to be bridged instead by a walkway, please indicate
that.
4. Although a photocopy of the green and white certified mail receipts was submitted as
proof of notification, the signed return receipt green cards must be submitted prior to
permit issuance.
5. A Check or Money Order to cover the Application Fee must be submitted. Please provide
this in the amount of $400 for commercial development.
To expedite our response to your permitting request, we will commence the detailed review of
your application for a permit pending the receipt of the additional information requested above.
However, the statutorily provided 75/150 days allowed for review cannot commence until such
time as we have received a complete application package. Once your application has been
accepted as complete, you will receive a separate notification letter.
If it is not possible to render a permit decision within 70 days of the date when your application
is received complete, you may request a meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal
Management and permit staff to discuss the status of your project. Such a meeting will be held
within five working days from the receipt of your written request and shall include the property
owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at our Elizabeth City office (252 264 3901) if you have any
questions regarding this letter or the permitting process.
Sincerely, _
i
C
Ron Renaldi
Coastal Management Representative
cc: Doug Huggett, Major Permits Coordinator, DCM; Morehead City RECEIVED
Frank Jennings, District Manager, DCM, Elizabeth City DEC 1
Michael Sifen, Applicant, Virginia Beach, VA 2012
DCM MUD crry

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY
I, PAUL J. TOTI, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM
AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE BY ME : DEED DFiCRIPTION FOUND IN OR 969, PG. 863,
THAT BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE OLARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM
INFORMATION FOUND IN D B SEE, PG. ROE,; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS 1:10,000 + ;THAT THY; PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA 21 NCAC 56.1600
1, PAUL J. TOTI PLS-3953. ALSO CERTIFY,
THIS PLAT IS OF A EXSTING PA:ICEL OF LAND AND DOES NOT CREATE A NEW STREET
OR CHANGE IN EXISTING STREET.
W TNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGIA LIRE, REG, NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 17 DAY OF
NOVEMBER. 2012.
WETLANDS CERTIFICATE
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNOARYQL
THE JURISDICTA OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNFJ ON THIS DATE UNLESS THERE IS CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REOULATIbNS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON
FOR A PLRIOD NOT TO EMCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS
SCALE. N.T.S.'
LI3 \ z
\ u
P � \
DATE 1
\ LOT 14/
USACE ACTION ID
F APPROP OVAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF
'ti� :4 A . ......... .
W�
X
,•iv
0
N
o
::AAij5
/v
8
0
N
0
s
f
LOT 13
NOTES: \\ s
1) OWNER CLIRRITU2O 34 LLG C/O MICHAEL 0. WEN. INC \
500 CENTRAL DRIVE_ SUITE 106
/ MRGNIA BEACH. VA 23464
2.) SEE PUT FOR EAST POINT ESTATES PREPARED BY
/ BOWMAN CONSULTING DATED XNE 25. 2012 FOR BASE FLOOD \
ELEVATION NFORMAION.
3.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO All SETBACK AND
EASEMENT REKSNTS iTEDHOTTTUCK �LOT 14.) 1HS SURVEY WWAPER0IMED FORTH
HE BENEFIT OFF A \
44,580 SF./1.023 AC. TOTAL TITLE REPORT AND MAY NOT REFLECT ALL EASEMENTS OR
372 SF./O.008 AC. WETLANDiy RESTRICTIONS THAT AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
44,208 SF./1.015 AC. HIGHLAND 5.) THIS IS NOT A BOtWARY SURVEY THIS IS A WETLANDS
DIDUINEPON MAP ONLY.
6 AEA BY COORDINATE METHOD.
.cV 7.) THE SOURCE MERDMN, PROPERTY UNES 8 LOT NUMBERS
3 FRUITVILLE TOWNSHIP
j SCALE 1" = 60' P
• JOB W83-01-001
DATE :2012-11-14 2"B
a /11/21
FILE No. 9283-404 2
2A/1II1/17
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE
AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE TAKEN FROM A PREU MURY
PLAT FOR EAST PONT ESTATES PREPARED BY BOWMAN
ppp OPEN SPACE A CONSULTING DATED JUNE 25. 2DI2
y / 91,977 SF./2111 AC. TOTAL A
15,762 SF./O.361 Al WETLANDS ��'I�
76,215 SF./1.750 AC. HIGHLAND 'A je;�-,'.20 - /
�Dv /4►A-10
ll;3
rA-11
t'
»A-1 /
LEGEND
PROPERTY CORNER
/`1.0 : WETLANDS POINT
,� - - - - - - WETLANDS
-WETLANDS LINE
—PROPERTY LINE
�3 - - ----TIE LINE
------------FLOODZONE UNE
—TRIBUTARY (206 LF)
—NON-RPW CONNECTION
404 WETLANDS MAP
FOR
EAST POINT ESTATES
60 0 60 120
COMMENTS Elizabeth City, NC 279D9
Phone: [phone]
RY AODEO Fax: [phone]
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
DIRECTION
L13
46.07'
S 68- 30' 19" W
L14
168.12'
N 22' 29' 12" W
L15
55.24'
N 46' 26' 23" E
L'16
21.06'
S 60' 25' 47" E
L17
24.84'
N 56' 31' 18" E
L18
14.60'
S 21' 23' 24" E
L19
15.71'
S 15' 02' 43" W.
L20
50.52'
S 47' 47' 38" E
L21
34.81'
S 24' 39' 30' E
L22
53.84'
S 31' 29' 47" W
NL23
46.67'
S 5' 10' 51" W
L'24
15.71'
N 1' 34' 58" E
CURRITUCK COUNTY - NO
Ud. I � C-M
"".lU111 g.,°m I C O N S U L T I N G
Bowman Carnultlng Group, Ltd.
m