165-96 Henry & Moore

Permit Class
Permit Number
NEW
Issued to
165-96
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
00 9 !0
P�IIYIt
9 l
!SIJ
fo; ����X Major De 1tan Area'of E iromnental Concerns�pursuant to L. 118;` c f����
X
Excavation and/or , pursq�eirt.to I�I�GS/11?3.229 �'
authorizing development in Beaufort County
Riverside Park as requested in the permittee's application dated 3/16/96, appl. letter for revision dated
10/31/96, including attached work plan drawings listed in Condition No. 1.
This pemut, issued on \ — 1. _ O� J. , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Revised Work plans
1) The project will be carried out in strict adherence to the following Work plans: sheets 1-5 of 5
with sheet 1 dated 3/7/96, sheets 2 & 3 dated revised 10/30/96, sheet 5 dated revised 10/28/96
and sheet 4 dated 5/16/96.
Basin and Canal Excavation
2) The proposed boat basin will be excavated as shown on revised plat No. 3 dated October 30,
1996. All spoils must be placed on high ground.
attached sheet for Additional
This permitaction may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31,1999
In issuing thi's permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Roger WSchecter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This peripit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Permit Class
NEW
PermitNumber
165-96
STATE OF NORTH-.CAROLINA
Department of Environment; HealtYf & Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
'Ver mi't-t-
% Major Development in an Areaof Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-I18
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N. Henry & Stuart B. Moore, P. O. Box 54, Washineton, NC 27889
authorizing development in Beaufort County at Pamlico River, canal and wetland off of, at
Riverside Park as requested in the permittee's application dated 3/16/96, appl. letter for revision dated
10/31/96, including attached work plan drawings listed in Condition No. 1.
This permit, issued on \ — 1, — g 6 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Revised Work plans
1) The project will be carried out in strict adherence to the following Work plans: sheets 1-5 of 5
with sheet 1 dated 3/7/96, sheets 2 & 3 dated revised 1`0/30/96, sheet 5 dated revised 10/28/96
and sheet 4 dated 5/16/96.
Basin and Canal Excavation
2) The proposed boat basin will be excavated as shown on revised plat No. 3 dated October 30,
1996. All spoils must be placed on high ground.
attached sheet for Additional
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Roger WSchecter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

N. Henry & Stuart B. Moore Permit 4165-96
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) The only excavation that will be allowed in regards to the canal widening is that which is shown
on revised plat No. 2 dated October 30, 1996. All spoils must be placed on high ground.
4) The proposed canal maintenance excavation and the proposed entrance channel excavation will
coincide with plat No. 2 dated May 16, 1996 and will not exceed 4.0 feet at NWL.
Bulkhead and Riprap Installation
5) All wooden bulkheads which are to be placed waterward of wetlands must be constructed no
higher than the adjacent wetlands and can not be backfilled.
6) All bulkhead and/or riprap alignments must be staked by a representative of the DCM prior to
its construction.
7) The placement of riprap or a wood bulkhead will not exceed the limitations as shown on plat
No. 4 dated May 16, 1996.
8) The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through
the structure.
9) The riprap material must be free from loose dirt or any other pollutant. It must be of a size
sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current action.
10) The riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as, but not limited to,
granite or broken concrete. Materials such as tires, car bodies, scrap metal, paper products,
tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar material, are not considered riprap.
Bride
11) No culvert will be placed within the canal. Instead, access will be gained by a bridge as shown
on revised plat No. 3 and revised plat No. 5 dated October 28, 1996. The bridge will have a
minimal clearance of 6.0 feet above the NWL at the lowest part of the bridge. The minimal
amount of horizontal clearance will be 12.0 feet.
Pier and Groins
12) The proposed pier and groins must be constructed as shown on plat. No. 2 dated May 16,
1996, except that no groin may be placed within 15.0 feet of any adjacent property line.

N. Henry & Stuart B. Moore
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Boat Ramp
Permit #165-93
Page 3 of 3
13) The proposed boatramp will be constructed as described on plat No. 5 dated October 28, 1996
and on plat No. 3 dated May 16, 1996.
14) The concrete slab for the boatramp must be poured on an upland site and pushed into place
once hardened because wet cement is toxic to aquatic organisms.
General
15) Prior to any construction, the permittee shall call for a site meeting with a representative of the
Division of Coastal Management in order to preclude misunderstanding of permit conditions.
16) The temporary placement or double -handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
17) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or
irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent
spillover of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
18) A permanent ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion will be provided on all exposed areas
within the shorter of 30 working or 120 calendar days after project completion.
19) Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control devices, measures, or structures will be used to
prevent sediment from entering the adjacent wetlands/watercourses/property (e.g., silt fence,
diversion swales/berms, sand fence, etc.).
NOTE: The Division of Water Quality approved this project on October 30, 1996 under
General Water Quality Certification No. 3025.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO January 6, 1997
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014 and State Permit No. 165-96
N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Post Office Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Messrs. Moore:
Reference your revised application for a Department of the Army (DA)
permit to undertake excavation and filling activities within Section 404
Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands, and facilitate development
of a single family homesite, including the construction of an access road,
pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp, and the placement of riprap,
on property located off State Road 1309, adjacent the Pamlico River, near
the City of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Your revised proposal has been reviewed and found to be consistent with
the provisions and objectives of General Permit No. 198000291. Therefore, you
may commence construction activity in strict accordance with applicable State
authorization and your revised plans. Failure to comply with the State
authorization or conditions of the general permit could result in civil and/or
administrative penalties.
If any change in your work is required because of unforeseen or altered
conditions or for any other reason, plans revised to show the change must be
sent promptly to this office and the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management prior to performing any such change or alteration. Such action is
necessary as revised plans must be reviewed and the authorization modified.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
�&J
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished with enclosure:
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment, F ��
Health and Natural Resources — `191> T
4401 Reedy Creek Road y
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO November 18, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
_ Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
Reference the revised application of N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to undertake excavation and filling
activities within Section 404 Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands,
and facilitate development of a single family homesite, including the
construction of an access road, pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp,
and the placement of riprap, on property located off State Road 1309, adjacent
the Pamlico River, near the City of Washington, -Beaufort County, North
Carolina. -.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented
by the application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following condition(s) be included in the State
authorization:
1. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict
compliance with the revised plans dated October 30, 1996.
2. No excavation or filling activity will take place within vegetated
wetlands or waters outside of the permitted area.
3. Excavation will not exceed four feet below the elevation of normal
water level (NWL).
4. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill
materials within waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
5. The authorized structure and associated activity will not cause an
unacceptable interference with navigation.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S. 10
Regulatory Project; Manager Qj If
Cb �C
L
s le �q✓� ��AsO
€1 djFNr

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Southeast Regional Office
9721 Executive Center Drive North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33702
September 27, 1996
Lt. Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth 11
District Engineer, Wilmington District
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers OCT3CF/V�O
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 KA, ti 199,
Attention Raleigh Bland
Dear Lt. Colonel Youngbluth:
In accordance with Part II, Section 4 of the current Memorandum of
Agreement Between the Departments of Commerce and the Army, I am
offering the following comments on permit application 199605014(GP)
dated September 4, 1996- The applicant, N. Henry and Stuart Moore
propose to excavate and fill wetlands adjacent to the Pamlico
River, Pamlico County, North Carolina. The purpose of the work is
to stabilize the shoreline and provide navigational access to a
proposed boat basin.
The proposed project consists of placing a total of 349 feet of
riprap material along the shoreline of Pamlico Sound, the existing
canal, and a proposed boat basin. In addition, three riprap groins
would be placed in the Pamlico River and a 3.5-foot-wide by 63-
foot-long L-shaped pier would be constructed. The existing canal
will be maintained to a depth of four feet at normal water and a 100-foot-long by 25-foot-wide access channel will level
el
excavated in the river to connect with the four foot contour. Alsbe
o
proposed is widening of the waterward 85 feet of the canal and
constructing a 43-foot-long by 21-foot-wide boat basin in wetlands.
A 25-foot-long by 15-foot-wide boat ramp will be constructed in the
canal and fill material will be placed in the canal to construct a
20-foot-wide causeway to provide access across the canal to a
residential construction site.
We do not object to the proposed placement of riprap along the
shoreline, the construction control, or to tof the three groins for erosion
he maintenance excavation of the existing canal
provided no wetlands are excavated or filled. Also, we have no
objection to the proposed causeway across the canal or boat ramp
provided wetland and open water impacts are minimized.
However, based on our knowledge of the project area and
coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management, we have determined that some aspects of this work will
be detrimental to fishery resources for which we are responsible.

16 December 1996
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Attn: Mr. John R. Parker Jr
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
I have received your letter dated December
permit issued to the Moore's. Thank you for
information and considering my letter for the
permit.
6 and a copy
sending this
issuance of
of the
said
Looking through the permit I see that 3 of the plats have been
revised. Is it possible for me to receive a copy of the revised
sheets 2 & 3 dated 10/30/96 and sheet 5 dated 10/28/96?
Thanks again for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
y REE� EO
DEC 19 1996
CUN��A'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, 0011,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Coastal Management A
James B. Hunt, Governor 1DE H N FR
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 6, 1996
Mr. Casey R. Cox
P. O: Box 604
Buxton, NC 27920
Dear Mr. Cox:
This letter is in reference to the comments that you submitted on a project proposal by
Henry & Stuart Moore. In consideration of your comments and those of state and Federal
application review agencies, the Moores have significantly revised their application. A bridge
replaces the culvert proposed earlier and wetland impacts are drastically reduced.
A copy of the permit is enclosed for your review. Should there be any question on the
Division's action on the subject application, do not hesitate to contact this office or David
Gossett in our Washington office.
Very sincerely,
Jo R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: David Gossett
DCM-Washington
Raleigh Bland, COE
P.O. Box 27687, Nim,FAX [phone]
An Equal
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources �'•
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N FZ
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 6, 1996
Mr. Eric Kelder
117 Cedar Circle
Washington, NC 27889
Dear Sir:
This letter is in reference to the comments that you submitted on a project proposal by
Henry & Stuart Moore. In consideration of your comments and those of state and Federal
application review agencies, the Moores have significantly revised their application. A bridge
replaces the culvert proposed earlier and wetland impacts are drastically reduced.
A copy of the permit is enclosed for your review. Should there be any question on the
Division's action on the subject application, do not hesitate to contact this office or David
Gossett in our Washington office.
Very sincerely,
AJohn.Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: David Gossett
DCM-Washington
Raleigh Bland, COE
P.O. Box 27687, Niq
CFAX 919-733-1495
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

P 404 457 750
a78�1-a�
$2.52.
�J! ,, tice
Ilyd Notice
mum—

Fold at line over top of envelope to

July 29, 1996
Mr. David Gossett
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, N.C. 27889
Dear Mr. Gossett:
I recently received a copy of Henry Moore's CAMA permit application to construct an
access road with a culvert crossing an existing canal adjacent to my property and connected to
the Pamlico River. Mr. Moore also proposed extensive maintenance excavation and boat ramp
construction. As an adjoining landowner, I am opposed to the project for the following reasons:
The proposed culvert would make the canal unnavigatable to boats for which the canal
was originally constructed. I'm in my late sixties and became a first time boat owner only
two months ago. I would like to reserve the right to utilize the canal to access the Pamlico
River.
• My property would no longer be considered waterfront if water access is precluded by a
culverted road crossing, thus depreciating property value. Should I decide to sell my
property in the future, I feel waterfront and boat access to the Pamlico River would be key
assets to the property's value.
• The proposed culvert would restrict critical drainage flow during storm events like
Hurricane Bertha. The potential threat for severe and prolonged flooding of my property
and others within the Cedar Circle community and adjoining watershed would increase if
the culvert is constructed.
• Over time the canal has filled in with sediment even with unrestricted flow to the river. A
culvert would accelerate the sedimentation process behind the structure, which can lead
to a higher water table, and associated problems with the surrounding septic systems.
I feel other alternatives exist which do not constitute construction of a culvert, and these
need to be explored before any consideration is given to the permit. Currently, Mr. Moore can
access his property and the canal through my property on the south side of the canal. Given this
fact, I question the necessity to construct a culverted road crossing over the canal from the north
or Edgewater Beach side, when he can already access the proposed site from the south side of
the canal.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, F
4�P �
Eric Kelder ` r
Girder
Washington, N.C. 27889
919/946-4490 -�

LZ

N.C. Division of Coastal Management,
PO Box 2188
1424 Ca3r:11inp Ave„
Washington, NC 27883--2198
Centl,nmsn
9 August 1996
u
I Clay I. Cox, ak.Jat;eeQTat P_ a.:,TxartY o,nter to ?Fanry and Stuart Moore,
object to f2Fe pxvaccsa.1 ?nz plication for permit to construct a
duly rt and a rod over the 0axsal ad"lacent to my property. I
also abj8r to a far. c:c�e t.;had. is not high asaough tza give access to
d slutall day sa.l.1eY •s'Fk.L 3 v�Si;.
A culvert, roa6 or b:: dgs cY,er the c�rtalwill cut off access to
the rive_- from my e,ropiart .
�. C2freY'e Z.x r
Gay I. Cox

1N3W39VNVR
1VJ.ww
9661 s,-� snn
"S •
SSA J Jb S?W
•oJ SSa�� b �So�oJC/ y4
�J1hpub JC heal'
pzSo jj 0
W b \ AI D ff � -;,'v-�-L )-r

6C,0;, 1
4�y96��T96
T
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
Washington District
PO Box 2188
1424 Carolina Ave.
Washington, NC 27889-2188
Gentlemen:
October 1996
I Casey R. Cox, adjacent property.owner to Henry and Stuart
Moore, object to the proposal and application for permit to
construct a culvert and a road over the canal adjacent to my
property. I also object to a bridge that is not high enough to
give access to a small day sailer sailboat.
A culvert and road over the canal will cut off access to the
river from my property.
In the Moore's application they have my father as the property
owner, where in fact my father has life estate and the property
owners are myself (Casey R. Cox) owning one half, my brother
(Tracey F. Cox) owning one quarter and my sister ( Gay I. Cox)
owning one quarter.
In 1964 my father Holman F. Cox built a house in Cedar Circle.
In 1971 my father and Bridget Cox paid to have a canal dug from
the Pamlico River by what is now Fortescue's property, Moore's
property, Smithwick'S property, Kelder's property, Cox's
property, and the property owner adjacent to the Kelders (which
to my knowledge has not been notified of the Moore's
application). The property adjacent to the Kelders is the
futherest property up the canal and is were my family lived when
my father paid to have the canal dug. In 1973 my father
purchased property from Bridget Cox which was passed to my
brother, sister and I in 1975.
For a number of years I have planned (after I retire from the
US Coast Guard and build a house on the property) to clean the
canal out to allow navigable boat access, as it was years ago
when my family used the canal for access to the river. My
planned cleaning of the canal would have no other construction
plans, would not include disturbing wet land, and would not
obstruct anyones access to the river.
I believe the Moore's proposed road will be in wet land. Their
drawings are misleading. The Moore's do have a 25' easement on
my property but that easement ends approximately 50' before
reaching the edge of the canal.

There is a existing road that leads all the way to the Moore's
property from Riverside that does not call for obstructing the
canal or disturbing wet land. It is my opinion that the Moore's
forgot to get a right away from their adjacent property owners
when they sold that property. I do not see why my family should
suffer from an obstructed canal when my family paid to have the
canal dug. The Moore's should purchase a right away from the
Smithwick's rather than obstructing a canal that can be used by 6
differt parties.
The Moore's application should be looked at carefully, and I
request that an actual inspection of the site with the adjacent
property owners be performed so that a permit will not be issued
that may later have to be revoked.
Sincerely,
Case Cox

Form DCM-MP-1
l
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name /✓•Henry lt-10c -ede 0,5/i1W`9 od, e
Address Pa Bo//K 5rf
City wos/rrri�yTo� State
Zip97999 Day Phone 9/9 9,116 67257
Fax NA
b. Authorized Agent:
b. City, town, community or landmark
.e/rersiv/e Po..�
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR /So'J, LeW.lod1yonaeLyne. Padef4.7E
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes _ " No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) PomAco 62/vey-
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Name /V 4 a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
NX excavation and/or filling activities.
Address ,�/oMe .Q/,brob o%nye, s�oPP
,LrKCdyg lion ono' iii//inq ac�iyi7�ieS_
City /V A State r✓A C�/Yer/. Boo/ rain o . Groin s
Zip N A Day Phone /V A b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? J0 ///
Fax Al
c. Project name (if any) N fi
NOTE. Perndr will be issaed in wme of Imm"ner(s), and/or
project now.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Beav7 or /
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? o ri v o• f e
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
e- r-ro S'/e q ,
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract /. 2 3 cv e r g s
1. b,. Size of individual lot(s) A.23 oe re s
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL,evet 5/rore_ /. 3'/a q..2'_ 57'y6 8
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Tini � `11
e. Vegetation on tractPn ban, P, vla� C las
/%o//v_ Brters 6.*nr Vve 6rffsv. Wef/en/
Veg'e eo•V%rl'
f. Man-made features now on tract No.,) e
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Cansuu the boat land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
✓ Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
/Vo h f
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? 1,, Yes No
(Attach zoning canrliance cettifrcate, ifoppliaabte)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yesy_ No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in . a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes ✓' No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? t� Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) Other Jl
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available) r
Xy 6,// S-01C'lee e/ U.S.. C. vsfr,r
/?o, Tog /000 / W.S410f4 n,/NC, Z7g89
Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Pro o s eo' se i oJ
None 6-X /s /raa) G'oo v a f pe�tT
Afi�c�c%ed
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) No n e-
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
i2o&,v Y IN91Pr sVs ie/Y!
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name -5�nrPh Wic W
Address z/o/ At Msr Fe/Sf YUosf�/��i«./V.C•
Phone [phone]F
Name . par.- Co. /e c r. )
Address 606 e,.r Rood Waslii Tan C•
Phone 9/6) 94'6 6 S9 • 2�av9
Name A- Co x
Address iP/. �' 6.)e/un� an, NC
Phone 9i9 9y6 5393 ,Z 7B89
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Noh t
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the /G ' day of M-7r• , 19 9G.
Print Name /Y�. /%/core Jr S1�u ral1S� Moo.-e
Signature %bey e--
tando r or Authorized Agnu
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
✓ DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
✓ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
✓ DCM MP-{
Structures Information
✓ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
k space provided at the bottom of each form.
E.vc /�elale•
Z y y C ewar• Clrrle
Wqs4.f AN. N C. z7ae,g
Revised 03/95
9/9 9416 IIW 90

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND -]FILL
(]��cppt bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-NIp-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of.th'e Joint.Application that relate to this
proposed' project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL) .
Canal £Y.sl+uf
Boat Ewsll'"y
basin
R.posea!
Boat
ramp e;'wde4
'~A'oh Z.kw Nt
3 - Rock
groin,5
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shon:line
stabilization)
Average Final
Eaicting Project
reneth Width Depth Depth
2 S'
3'
gs�
1-7
4/.3'
y3
13�
N�
\�. !.:,�
\tom/•,:�y'��
NA
NA
X
N.4
1. EXCAVATION
4'rea5 preedolly
a. Amount of material to be excavated froTAbelow
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 919.6
b. Type of material to be excavated S', /� g 57'0
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? ✓ Yes No
Ree.sed Cohn/d`Boo•/Bds�n ,2�3y8 gy�j Beof�n/. 270 s'7
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards O
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area /0-4 /10-/ oh sanz.e.
prosy, Wef /o.,o' 45 sinwh oh 10//N 3
z5-7 s9. /'A.
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
✓ Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? __�/ Yes _ No
If yes, where? SnMC /Jre'her��
Revised 03195 _

. Form DCM-MF-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? 3
�/ yes' No See PI10
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
yes v/_ No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead ✓ Riprap
b. Length 3 i —
C.
Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
f
(Source of information) 0.6Seh Yet //0I7
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material ROC K
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap 35 N A
(2) Bulkhead backfll
h.: Type of fill material Ro C
i. Source of fill material Ro c ' `i' vOtq
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
1/ yes No
If yes,
(2)
3
(3)
Amount of material to be placed in the
water/ 8 ca vds -A d -8• ��
Dimensions of fill area Ralyd— To'X2O'
Purpose of fill A -�_ /'/QZ 64• 3
(jrernt Sty P/i/Ye �
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
�/ yes No
If yes, Bae�eo+•p _Trngo%r s
(1) Dimensions of fill areagaLm = �.t',.
L<odseoprR r. long/rs �sX�sx/Y��srZ2X28 = Rsrsy�
(2) Purpose of fill Rea ti " d
L onrisewoinw
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? S6,' eh Af'07
S><k.o,w P/tif 5Zfas1,
b. What type of construction equipment will.be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
6Qc,F/e e
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? ✓ Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Use of eMl
/U.1/enr /'/sore Jn �S�Ggr�.C7.
AppGcant or Project Name
Signature
196
Date
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed / — //o m -e-
b. Number of lots or parcels 0"7 e —
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) O v e-
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. /5' X /oo
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes NOVA
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
/W ,7,0- /
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. .577,
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Enviromne tal Management for review?
Yes No
If yes, date submitted NA
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Se i Tnk
Pernif 35�7 a/ ached
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? ye
(Attach appropriate docunwntadon)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
I. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Pa6/er S�y/eror— COUnZV
in. Will water be impounded? _ Yes ✓ No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N,4
/U Hen /(/%aore �r. S�Ggtj/✓ /%aor�
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
3//6/96
Date
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial _Community Private
(2) Number /
(3) Length 7S'
(4) Width 3.5'
(5) Finger Piers —Yes ✓No
(i) Number NA
(ii) Length NA
(iii) Width NA
(6) Platform(s) ✓ Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length 76
m Width /A
(7) Number of slips proposed
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines No�1/i 55'— Soe/dS 69
(9) Width of water body O."e irl/fit
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL '�z
Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) NA Commercial NA Private
(2) Length NA
(3) Width N A
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Number S
(2) Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length NA
(2) Average distance. from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands /V A
e. Mooring buoys
(1) ft.4 Commercial 14Community /UA Private
(2) Number NA
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
NA
(4) Width of water body NA
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline IM
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) 1L CommercialN4 Community y Private
(2) Number NA
(3) Length 114
(4) Width NA
g. Other (Give rnpleee ascription)
DocF — T// X2.5
See
/i�IyC h MCIO Pe it-,Sl uq r/ 8/� Moo e-
Applicm or Project Name vlw
signature
s'/id /g 4
Date
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public NA Private N A
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge NA
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL Al A
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes NA No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge NA
(2) Width of existing bridge NA
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge NA
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) N A
zv A
L Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
IV,4 yes /YA No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert 1114
(2) Width of existing culvert /yX
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or N1WL NA
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) /N A
g. Length of proposed bridge
h. Width of proposed bridge N,4
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands N
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
NA Yes N,4 No NA
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
N,4
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? &4 Yes L No
If yes, explain NA
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? IV.4 Yes NA No
If yes, explain NA
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes IV4 No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revered 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
„- - j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation i
2. CULVERTS potential? Yes t/' No
If yes, explain Po/enT-/ PPO " Z Vlsfaj'an
ends a dew -Peel foes`
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed T
Canal /Goc/in e 14t
b. Number of culverts proposed /
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes ✓ No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge NA
(2) Width of existing bridge N A
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge N A
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) NA
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes NA No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert NI
(2) Width of existing culvert �—
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL NA
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) NA
f. Length of proposed culvert I
g. Width of proposed culvert
3/
h.' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL / 5-
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes ✓ No
If yes, explain Cu/yer/ S,-z e !Z-f h'T/
.dv 007-
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL '
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes v/ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated N4
(2) Width of area to be excavated N,(
(3) Depth of area to be excavated N A
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards IV.4
Will the placement of the proposed bridge onculvert
require any excavation within:
No Coastal Wetlands Z SAVs Aa Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated NA
(2) Width of area to be excavated NQ
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards NA
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes i/No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated NA
(2) Width of area to be excavated N A
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards N A
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
N.4
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
NA
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
NA Yes Iv A No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? NX Yes 1V4 No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
IVX Yes Iv-4 No
If yes, give dimensions different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? IV,4 Yes NX No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. W ill the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? tel Yes No
If (1) Length of area to be filled 20
(2) Width of area to be filled 20
(3) Purpose of fill To Xm,-/d Rood
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
No Coastal Wetlands AL6 SAVs A& Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled N'4
(2) Width of area to be filled W/;
(3) Purpose of fill N�
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? ✓ Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled /Do
(2) Width of area to be filled /5
(3) Purpose of fill 7.lc,,, /W Road
4. GENERAL
a.
Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes V _ No N A
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes ✓ No
If yes, explain in detail N A
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes ✓ No
If yes, explain in detail A4
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes ✓No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Screen i en d e '.
$l/-o1.1 yy ,71 to sS
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? '4 ' ""4 ehd /ovc/eA-
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes ✓ No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. /y,4
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require,any shoreline stabilization?
Yes No
If yes, explain in detail 46br p - P,
r s5
N. //enr v No---- Jr, e SfUcli f )5
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
5—//�z 9G
Revised 03/95

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and of Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 6, 1996
Mr. N. Henry Moore
Mr. Stuart B. Moore
P. O. Box 54
Washington, NC 28469
Dear Sir:
A ool"r
EDEHNFR
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where applicable,
the State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff -colored form) is
retained by you and it must be available on site when the project is inspected for compliance. Please sign both the
original and the copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed envelope. Signing the permit and proceeding
means you have waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you may request a hearing pursuant to NCGS 113A-121.1
or 113-229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance with NCGS Chapter 150B with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 11666, Raleigh, NC 27611, [phone] within twenty (20) days of this
decision bn your permit. You should also be aware that if another qualified party submits a valid objection to the
issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days, the matter must be resolved prior to work initiation. The Coastal
Resources Commission makes the final decision on any appeal.
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work must be
carried out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future maintenance require
additional approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review all project plans, as approved.
If you are having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to be sure that he fully understands all
permit requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we request that
you complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if questions arise concerning
permit conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact Department personnel at any time for
assistance. By working in accordance with the permit, you will be helping to protect our vitally important coastal
resources.
Very sincerely,
Jo . Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/amw
Enclosure
P.O. Box 27687, I� �� An E fAX 9Afflrm-1495
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 1 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 177�1111 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 •
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E)E H N R
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 6, 1996
Mr. Tracy H. Cox
7253 Free Union Road
Pinetown, NC 27865
Dear Mr. Cox:
This letter is in reference to the comments that you submitted on a project proposal by
Henry & Stuart Moore. In consideration of your comments,and those of state and Federal
application review agencies, the Moores have significantly revised their application. A bridge
replaces the culvert proposed earlier and wetland impacts are drastically reduced.
A copy of the permit is enclosed for your review. Should there be any question on the
Division's action on the subject application, do not hesitate to contact this office or David
Gossett in our Washington office.
Very sincerely,
John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: David Gossett
DCM-Washington
Raleigh Bland, COE
P.O. Box 27687, �� C FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Raleigh, North Carolina27611-7687 N�
Voice919-733-2293 7�� 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
le
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt; Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
December 6, 1996
Ms. Gay Cox
P. O. Box 14293
St. Petersburg, FL 33733
Dear Ms. Cox:
This letter is in reference to the comments that you submitted on a project proposal by
Henry & Stuart Moore. In consideration of your comments and those of state and Federal
application review agencies, the Moores have significantly revised their application. A bridge
replaces the culvert proposed earlier and wetland impacts are drastically reduced.
A copy of the permit is enclosed for your review. Should there be any question on the
Division's action on the subject application, do not hesitate to contact this office or David
Gossett in our Washington office.
Very sincerely,
John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw
cc: David Gossett
DCM-Washington
Raleigh Bland, COE
P.O. Box 27687, ��FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Ile DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park near the City of Washington in
Beaufort County
Photo Index - 1995: 100-1062, U19 1989: 2-64-7, M13 1984: 73-580, 013
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,587,600 Y: 647,400 Washington LR
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge and Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 19 August 1996 (Several other visits have
been made with applicants)
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 13 August 1996
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area, Estuarine Waters
(C) Water Dependent: Both
(D) Intended Use: Development of single family homesite with boating access
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - Septic tank
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - Pier, riprap, single family dwelling, culvert, boat ramp
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: ±2'
Source - DCM observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
±2,268 sq. ft.
±847 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Openwater
+10,367 sq. ft.
2,290 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1.23 acres or nearly the entire site
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SB Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to develop a single family homesite which
involves the upgrading of an existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access
road, and boatramp.

f , N. HENRY MOORE JR. AND STUART B. MOORE
Beaufort County
Environmental settine
The applicant owns a 1.23 acre tract of land off of SR 1309 adjacent to the Pamlico
River in Beaufort County. Of the 1.23 acres, a considerable amount of the property has been
designated as wetlands by the COE. The wetland delineation is shown on Plat No. 2 in the
application package. Historically the property has experienced ongoing erosion along the
Pamlico River, which is evident by an erosion scarp. No, shoreline stabilization efforts have
been made until this time. Along the eastern edge of the property a canal is present which
connects to the Pamlico River. The applicants' eastern property line is located within this canal.
The canal, which has a width of ±20", continues past the applicants' property and thus is
adjacent to other properties. The canal has not been maintained in many years and now averages
±1' in depth at normal water. At approximately 100' south of the mouth of the canal the
Pamlico River has a depth of ±4' at NWL. Along a majority of the length of the canal, as
shown on Plats 2 and 3i much of the adjacent areas have been designated as wetlands by the
COE. This area is predominately vegetated with Carex App., Virginia Wild Rye Grass, Smart
Weed, Marsh Mallow and many other species. The highground portions of the property is
vegetated with both pines and a variety of hardwood trees.
On 12 July 1996 Hurricane Bertha had a severe impact on the property. Several large
trees have fallen which are crossed throughout the wetland area. Also a rack line indicates that
several feet of water was over much of the property.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing the following:
(1) The placement of riprap along ±154' of shoreline adjacent to the Pamlico River.
This riprap will average ±5' and will be a maximum of ±10' beyond the NWL.
This riprap will extend from the western property line to the mouth of the canal.
Where the riprap is to be waterward of wetland vegetation, it will not be placed
atop the wetlands, nor any higher than the ground elevation of the wetlands.
(2) The placement of riprap along the edge of the proposed widen canal (see #7) and
around the proposed boatbasin (see #9). This area of riprap will have a length
of ± 195' and it will be. placed as close as possible to the toe of the canal edge.
As in #1, since this entire area is bordering wetlands, no riprap will be placed
atop any wetlands nor higher than the ground elevation of the wetlands.
(3) The placement of three riprap groins in the Pamlico River. The locations of these
groins are shown on plat #2. Each groin will extend 15' beyond the NWL. Each
will have a bottom width of 5', a top width of 1.5' and will extend 1.5' above the
NWL.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 2
(4) The construction of a 3.5' wide by 63' long pier with a 16' by 12' L-shaped
platform within the Pamlico River. The location of the pier is shown on plat #2.
(5) The proposed excavation of a ±100' long by ±25' wide access channel in the
Pamlico River to provide better access to the mouth of the existing canal. This
area averages ±3' in depth at normal water and will be excavated to a ±4' depth
at normal water. All spoils are to be placed on highground.
(6) The maintenance excavation of ±392' of canal. The canal averages ±20' in
width, has an existing depth of ±1.3' at normal water and will be excavated to
a depth of -4' at normal water. The canal is shown on Plats 2 and 3. All spoils
are to be placed on highground. It should be noted that a portion of this canal
is on the property of Mr. Perry Fortesque. A letter from Mr. Fortesque is in the
application package giving the applicants permission to work on his property.
(7) The widening of the southern most ±85' of the existing canal. This widening
will extend from the mouth of the canal to the proposed boatbasin (see #9). This
widening will involve the excavation of a ±17' wide strip of wetlands along the
western edge of the existing canal. This area will also be excavated to a depth
of -4' at NWL.
(8) The maintenance excavation of a ±43' long area which has a width of ±9' and
a depth of ±1.0'. This area is located along the west side of the canal and is
being described as an existing boatbasin on plat #2. The area actually has very
little resemblance to a boatbasin. The area proposed is to be excavated to a
depth of -4' at NWL. All spoils are to be placed on highground.
(9) The proposed enlarging of the area that is being described as a boatbasin by the
excavation of wetlands on both the north and south sides of the area. The
excavation will result in a 43' long by 21' wide by -4' deep at NWL boatbasin
connected to the existing canal. All spoils will be placed on highground. See
plat #2 for details.
(10) The construction of a dock along the north and west sides of the new boatbasin.
This dock will have a total length of ±60' and will have a width of 2.5". See
plat #2 for details.
(11) The construction of a 25' long by 15' wide concrete boatramp, of which 15' will
extend beyond the NWL. The ramp will be constructed within a wetland area on
the northeast side of the canal (see plat #3). This ramp will result in ±270 sq.
ft. of wetlands to be excavated and ±407 sq. ft. to be filled.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 3
(12) The placement of a fill causeway across the canal to provide access to the
proposed homesite. Present access is now on the west side of the canal,
however, the applicant wishes to obtain access from additional property he owns
on the east side of the canal (see plat #3). The causeway will have a 16' top
width and will be crossing the canal at an area which has a width of ±20'. A 3'
culvert will be placed within the causeway to allow for continued drainage.
Riprap will be placed atop the pipe on each side of the causeway.
(13) The development of a single family homesite on the highground portion of the
property. As part of the landscaping, the applicant is proposing to fill a ±440
sq. ft. area of isolated wetlands (see plat #3).
Environmental impact
The following environmental impacts will occur:
(1) The placement of riprap to stabilize the shoreline will result in +1.745 sq. ft. of
open water area filled within the Pamlico River and the manmade canal.
(2) The construction of the three groins will result in +225 sq. ft. of open water area
to be filled in the Pamlico River.
(3) The access channel will result in +2.500 4. ft. of shallow water habitat to be
excavated in the Pamlico River.
(4) The canal widening will result in +1.445 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation to be
excavated on the west side of the canal.
(5) The canal maintenance excavation will result in +7.480 sq. ft. of shallow water
area to be excavated.
(6) The boatbasin maintenance excavation will result in +387 sq. ft. of shallow water
area to be excavated.
(7) The enlarging of the boatbasin will result in +553 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation
to be excavated.
(8) The placement of the boatramp will result in +270 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation
being excavated.
(9) The placement of the proposed boatramp will result in +407 sq. ft. of wetland
vegetation being filled.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 4
(10) The proposed causeway will result in +320 sq. ft. of open water area in the
existing canal to be filled. Also, this causeway will not allow any navigation
beyond this point to other properties.
(11) The landscaping will result in +440 sq. ft. of isolated wetlands to be filled.
David L. Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 26 August 1996

DEHNR Fax:[phone] Dec a '96 8:53 P.02/03
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. sex laso
WILNIINGTON, NOFUH CAROL INA 28402-1890
:m =FP!Y aE =_F TO
:Ioverber '_d, 199=
C � ' CM 1D NO 9960S013
.._ �OLSC1-.92:Kcr
-E o_' ^_oas-al. manacen,Ent
Ncp: t`•. Caro-_ .a DewFrt;::-slt of Enviz-anmaat,
Paa l -h, a:iC: N.=_ural Fesource5
aoSt 0� ic- Bu.x -ss
....-�- Notn Ca --ina 375'_1-7t787
ReCe` erica the rev i oeu sppicatior of N. Fenr-y, .1 '. and
Denarzm. _ t cf the :-=y ;OAI ermip to ct:derzake eNCavat_or_ _ dJf: 1
1�
"ec_-on 404 9epaytac: o' _he __=y ju:.sd-ot_u :__
and"`aczll_a:.e e.e_opR.�rt a si_, 1a-,il; _.olresite, '_nc:::n:ng~�:_��
otYan -- -se road, >r-er; noatramr, acce5 ,_:eS.•`, _..-_ hc- _
anc'e ^1,3ce^ nt of rior- on Lrooert,, _ocar._� -f` St ae noac 13v .-__=nt
t,, .- 2.?._J_C '<.i`_" _'.c=, net_^a C1ty Was^inu't'.'n, SnuLU:t C'-oIInty, ':o=h
arol Cna—
T c Federalseer,:_`as :nave comn_ete .. rev_=of tn= __3po..__
ni
r t:-,N acolcscon an vour _=c1�1 1nve st iya _10 _e_T.crt.
recomm=d that. vhe-u-lo•:riec .,.,..di _;n be :^ 1',1=d in hi "..-`--
1. All wo C'.< =.l:.t_icrized by :his per --It m1J8t he per=ormerl in a_ri�t
. r.ar,.. wit: _I,e r_;i_pd :clans dated uctnner 30, a 6.
2. No exeava_lon or filling 3.C=iv_ty wi:_ _ake plape wl.t.h;n ✓_ e� :.'
wetlands cr .aater5 outside of the ner-n.i" t_d area.
`4 _. 7: avatior! will "_-_GC exread -Ull_ fae:. �.v._ow =he
V 'waueC _eve. iNWil . .
\ ,4. Te_te:-lperary olacement or doual: ha _dling of :=rcava e. _ or
V ma=crj:31y _ ••;=c2Y3 or vegeCat-.d wet'_dnde _s no-_ duchorize:..
°. T.^.e a`,::hor zed st'.=cL '_'c anrG azzociated ..l =:.v- _ will :iGC ^_allCe �.r,
sly_!&Viga_?on.
:_:ae9Ci0r_s or c^ m(' nzc may he adore zec .9 I"i:. P...;'.aich 3=_nd, :lash- ;ton
Re"!,1,,n•y ❑•21d Off:ce, teleuhoi:c (9i,10 ^:-1=15, c:aer:S f.On 23Ra
:?ecalator Prij-cm Manager

I DEHJR Fax:[phone] Dec 4 '96 8:53 P.01/03
North Carolina
Department of
Environment, Health
Natural Resources
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, N. C. 27889
Rhone: 919-946.5481
TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
DATE:
- 7Y 2
FAX: [phone]
Number of pages (including cover page).
COMMENTS: -
x

APPLICATION TRANSMnTAL/PROCESSING RECORD
A) ,Applicant: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore County: Beaufort
Location of Project: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park near the City of Washington
Date Application Received Complete by Field: 13 August 1996
Field Recommendation: Attached To be Forwarded X
Consistency Determination: Attached To be Forwarded X
Field'Representative: D. Gossett &istrict Office: 'Washington
District Manager
B) Date Application Received, in
Public Notice Rec'd:
AUG �)S Fee Rec'd: $
Adj. Rip. Prop Notices Rec'd:
Application Assigned to:
C) 75 Day Deadline:
Mail Out Date:
Federal Due Date:
Permit Final Action: Issuey Deny
D)
f Notice Date:
Deed Rec'd:
on q—a5—�tL
150 Day Deadline:
State Due Date:q
Fed. Comments Rec'd on
Draft on
AGENCY
DATE COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management District Office
Division of Comm. Assistance
3 _OI�
Land Quality Section
Div. of Env. Management
6 —3V —9 b
V
State Property Office
Div. of Archives & History
—
Div. of Env. Health
Div. of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Div. of Water Resources
Div. of Marine Fisheries
5 A

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
To: John Parker
From: David Gossett r
Through: Terry Moore
Date: 7 November 1996
.vv
E) FEE HNFR
Subject: Application for State Permits from Stewart and Henry Moore, Riverside Park,
Adjacent the Pamlico River, Beaufort County
On 13 August 1996 the DCM accepted an application from the subject applicants to
develop apiece of property on the Pamlico River just east of the City of Washington. As you are
aware, when the application package was circulated objections were received from several
agencies and two adjacent property owners. The agency objections were mainly based on the
widening of the existing canal and the widening of an existing boat basin, both in wetlands under
the jurisdiction of the COE. The total amount of wetlands to be excavated was 1,998 square feet.
Also, concerns were expressed over the blocking of tradational navagation by a proposed culvert
in the canal. The culvert was also the concern of the adjacent property owners.
On 28 October 1996 I met the applicants at the site along with Raleigh Bland and Bill
Biddlecome, both with the COE, to try an modify the project so that it could become permittable.
During this meeting it was decided to modify the project as follows:
1. To replace the proposed culvert with a bridge. The bridge will have a minimal
clearance of 6.0 feet above the NWL.
2. To move the proposed boat basin out of wetlands and place it in highground. The
new proposed basin will have a length of 56.0 feet and a width of 15.0 feet.
3. To reduce the widening of the canal to only that necessary to advoid the existing
boat house which is located in the canal and owned by one of the adjacent property
owners. The wetlands to be excavated will have a length of 74.0 feet and a width
of 10.0 feet. The moving of the boat basin as described in No. 2 and the reducing
of the width of the canal will reduce the total amount of wetlands to be excavated
from 1,998 square feet to 740.0 square feet.
4. To replace the proposed riprap with a low bulkhead which will be constructed no
higher than the adjacent wetlands and will not be backfilled.
Enclosed is a package of material dated 31 October 1996 from the applicants which reflect
the changes that I have described above. I recommed that the permit be issued with the attached
plats reflecting the changes. Also the following conditions should be placed on the permit:
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

MEMORANDUM
Moore Application
7 November 1996
The proposed boatbasin will be excavated as shown on revised plat No. 3 dated 30
October 1996. All spoils must be placed on highground.
No culvert will be placed within the canal. Instead, access will be gained by a
bridge as shown on revised plat No. 3 and revised plat No.5 dated 28 October
1996. The bridge will have a minimal clearance of 6.0 feet above the NWL at the
lowest part of the bridge. The minimal amount of horizonal clearance will be 12.0
feet.
The only excavation that will be allowed in regards to the canal widening is that
which is shown on revised plat No. 2 dated 30 October 1996. All spoils must be
placed on highground.
The proposed pier and groins must be constructed as shown on plat No.2 dated 16
May 1996, except that no groin may be placed within 15.0 feet any adjacent
property line.
All wooden bulkheads which are to be placed waterward of wetlands must be
constructed no higher than the adjacent wetlands and can not be backfilled.
All bulkhead and/or riprap alignments must be staked by a representative of the
DCM prior to its construction.
7. The proposed boatramp will be constructed as described on plat No.5 dated 28
r 1 October 1996 and on plat No. 3 dated 16 May 1996.
8. The placement of riprap or a wood bulkhead will not exceed the liminitations as
shown on plat No. 4 dated 16 May 1996
C 9. $ The proposed canal maintenance excavation and the proposed entrance channel
excavation will coincide with plat No. 2 dated 16 May 1996 and will not exceed
4.0 feet at NWL.
10.1 The riprap material must be free from loose dirt or any other pollutant. It must be
of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current
action.
11.10 The riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as but
not limited to granite or broken concrete. Materials such as tires, car bodies, scrap
metal, paper products, tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar
material, are not considered riprap.
\,yya J 12. Z The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill
materials through the structure.
13. l5 The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within
waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
14.16 All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of
regularly or irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining
structures to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
I believe the modified project, along with the requested conditions, should satisfy the
agency concerns, therefore as we have discussed, I see no reason to re -circulate the application
package. When you begin to put the permit together please contact me an we'll go over the file
to be sure we have the correct plats included. If you have any questions do not hestitate to
contact me.
CC: Preston Pate
Raleigh Bland

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker n
FROM: Terry Moore -(
DATE: 29 August 1996
SUBJECT: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore Major CAMA and Dredge and
Fill Permit Application in Beaufort County, North Carolina
Based upon review of the Beaufort County Land Use Plan, as well as my familiarity with
other similar projects in the past, I conclude that this application, although involving a significant
amount of filling and excavation of 404 wetlands, is consistent with the aforementioned land use
plan. ��-
cc: Preston Pate
David Gossett
REc NEO
AUG 30 1996
Vc.;W;AL
M1 NACEMEW

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
27 August 1996
11310131�:.i�� 1i14JUi
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
�8084
E:)FEE HNF 1
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFiC'E
AUG28�,
aEa
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. RECEIVED
Major Permits Processing Coordinator 411C 301996
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review �Nv1Ro^,nrvrAtsce�Es
Applicant: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B.00 e
Project Location: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park adjacelit- the Pamlico River near the City
of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To develop a single family homesite which involves the upgrading of an
existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access road,
and boat ramp.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 17 September 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data I ,
requested. �2
96
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the
recommended changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the proposed project for reasons described
in the attached comments.
�p
Signed I`7/" I Date
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

F
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
JameSB. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan K Fiowes, Secretary
A. Preston It w•ard,Jr.,P.E.,Directcr
A±MMMa±L1 - __M_ - M
IDCF-1"F1
tk'tutx r 30,:19E?96
y
DWQ Project 4 960844
COF.' #199605f1[4
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
MI. Henry Minoru•.
P.0.13nx 54
��l'a511111$lirtl, NC 27$"n0
rkrar Llr_ Nivow:
You have Our approval to place fill material and dredge in 15,772 5ytarc foct of wetlands or waters for
th purpose or con in:'rrng a',ome. fa.lilies rt 5R IKV as yor, ilea nberl io vou, ipn-i;.,in •n
dated 30 August 1996fr r in y : aL' au_a e I c de: i d tha[ trotf <I i s,v se by _n
%km' QuAlt +ttr.: it on NU'r'_ t
This approval is only valid fo se and deign that )ou drscrrbed in your application e-Kotpt 9ti
modified below. 1f you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a reu'
application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions hsted irr the attached ceruficauvi,
iy r ..' :003outiul �.:'.:rt" .ivnc uStCki: he:Ow. A d ,14 :. il;ih 1 , . : _•n_ i a � :t1 c'3i. �i,t:hail ti t' ice.. -
remaining wedartL, ou the property to prevent future fill. In addition, you should get any other feikraL star'
or lcv. l permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Frosion
Coastal SerrL;waiet, "ion•LliiChSrti2 and A _b_r Suppl) Wa.crshed rrl;clatiom
1f you do not accept any of the conditions of" certification, you may ask for an adjudicator,, hearing.
You alost a:: %�idirn. St !a,,, of Lhe dar ilia', ,,tiu r 4Ct:iyc d:rs fiber. To a:;l, tilt :i hv: log �ef l a , . i,-.'. i
Petition which conforms w Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statures to the Oft:ce of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27,147, Raleigh. N.C. 27611-7447. This certification, :ind its conditions
:uc f_nid and burdrng unless yi,u ask for a acarir:g.
This iOitCC complete; the rs.viCw of The DIV7 $IQn of l\:3tea t.,Eualir; ;m.1rr Secaou S(11 ; 4
A.L A you have au)question,, please wlcpt:une Jolut Dome)' at 9i4-7 3-178ti.
Sincerely,
i' P It
cc: A iimingic n Distrir t Corps of Bngineeib
Corps of F,nguieeis Washington Fickt 011_1rc
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Donley
s . Central File
}1!K 1Hd-r J t f
I` ' pap6i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
27 August 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Charles Gardner, Director 10 II
Division of Land Resources
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. FO F/i
Major Permits Processing Coordinator0,9
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Sty art B. Moore S `�
Project Location: Off SR 1309 at Riverside P\\arkadjacent the Pamlico River near the City
of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To develop a single family homesite which involves the upgrading of an
existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access road,
and boat ramp.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 17 September 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is
requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the
recommended changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the proposed project for reasons described
in the attached comments.
Signed '� ` / e Date d
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SE TION
d� 3 0-I�
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Parker, Jr./Stephen Benton
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: Patrick H. McClain
Assistant Land Quality Regional Engineer
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT:
This office will require that:
1. The area be properly graded.
2. A permanent ground cover,sufficient to restrain erosion
be provided on all exposed areas within the shorter of
30 working or 120 calendar days after project comple-
tion.
3. The exterior slopes of the disposal area dikes be at an
angle no steeper than 1 1/2 H: 1 V.
4. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control devices,
measures, or structures be used to prevent sediment
from entering the adjacent wetlands/watercourses/
property (e.g., silt fence, diversion swales/berms,
sand fence, etc.).
5. A ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion be
provided within 30 working days of completion of any
phase of grading on cut or filled slopes.
6. An erosion and sedimentation control plan be submitted
at least 30 days prior to initiation of land -disturbing
activities.
7_ Additional information concerning the area of the land-
ward disturbance be submitted to determine if an
erosion control plan is required.
S. Other:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
&F15WA
17M
4 t*o?
; Ar
C)EHNR
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
August 30, 1996
Mr. N. Henry Moore, Jr.
Mr. Stuart B. Moore
P.O. Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RE: Homesite off SR 1309, Riverside Park
Beaufort County
Drainage Basin: Tar -Pamlico
Dear Messers. Moore:
As an agency involved in the Division of Coastal
Management's major permit review process., we hereby inform you of
the possibility of your needing to obtain additional permits in
regard to your proposed project.
If the land -disturbing activities associated with this
project (grading, filling, diking, spoiling, etc.) will affect at
least one acre, then a sedimentation and erosion control plan
must be filed with this office for approval at least thirty days
prior to construction.
You are advised to contact this office so that such a
determination can be made.
In the event a plan is required, the contents of the plan
should include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. A scaled plat plan of the site, showing the affected
areas as well as adjacent properties which may be
affected. Include contours if available.
2. Indicate critical areas such as wetlands, creeks,
streams, drainageways, marsh, etc.
3. Include a brief narrative describing the activities to
be undertaken and a construction schedule.
4. Indicate on the plat the measures to be utilized to
prevent sediment from entering adjacent properties,
such as location of silt fences, silt basins, diversion
ditches, areas to be seeded, etc.
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/l0%Post-consumer paper

Mr. N. Henry Moore, Jr.
Mr-. Stuart B. Moore
August 30, 1996
Page 2
5. Include seeding and mulching specifications for both
temporary and permanent stabilization.
6. Include any other pertinent information directed at
controlling offsite sedimentation, slope degradation,
and erosion.
To begin such a project without the approval of an erosion
and sedimentation control plan may be considered a violation of
the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and.may
lead to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $500.00 per
day for each day the project is deemed in violation.
In the event a plan is not required, you must still:
a) provide a buffer, either vegetative or mechanical,
sufficient to restrain sediment from entering adjacent
property or watercourses;
b) provide all cut or filled slopes with an angle which
can be restrained by vegetative cover (generally 2(H)
to l(V)); and,
c) provide all exposed slopes with a ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion within 30 working days
of completion of any phase grading (rough or final).
If you should have any questions concerning this, please
feel free to call.
Sincerely
Pa r ck H. McClain, P.E.
Assistant Regional Engineer
cc: John R. Parker, Division of Coastal Management

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
27 August 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Bruce L. Freeman, Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
�EHNF�
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
,2
SfP 25 TOiL
Project Location: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park adjacent the Pamlico River near the City
of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To develop a single family homesite which involves the upgrading of an
existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access
road, and boat ramp.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 17 September 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is
requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the
recommended chan ere incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the proposed project for reasons described
in the attached comments.
Signed �� /I ��y� Date
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

_ State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Bruce L. Freeman, Director
MEMORANDUM
J
, �'
YAK
IDFEE HNF=11'
23 September 1996
TO: John Parker, Jr.
DCM Major Permits Processing Coordinator
FROM: P.A.. Wojciechowski
SUBJECT: DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT
N. Henry Moore, Jr. and Stuart Moore, Riverside Park, Pamlico River,
Beaufort County
Attached is the Division's reply for the above referenced project. If you have any
questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
PAW/bc
SEP 26 .,96
MAP�iGEMENT
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 25557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Bruce Freeman, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker}
FROM: Katy West �` J
DATE: 20 September 1996
EHNPt
SUBJECT: CAMA major Permit, N. Henry Moore, Jr. and Stuart Moore, Riverside Park,
Pamlico River, Beaufort County
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) offers the following
comments pursuant to G.S. 113-131. The NCDMF primary concern with the proposed
activities is the loss of wetlands associated with widening the existing canal (item #7) and
enlarging the 'boat basin' (item #9).
Loss of wetlands indirectly impact fishery resources. Wetlands play an important
role in modifying hydrologic events. For example, wetlands moderate stormwater runoff,
trap sediments dropped from suspension as the water flow is lowered, and fix mineral
nutrients in plant tissues which are later released as detritus. Wetlands act as a sponge
soaking up and filtering pollutants that would otherwise run into sensitive coastal water.
All of these functions are beneficial to the "health" of associated estuarine systems.
From the other proposed activities the applicant appears to have reasonable
utilization of the property for boating without infringing on additional wetland areas.
NCDMF recommends approval of the project under the following conditions:
1 . Activities #7 and #9 be omitted from the permit.
2. The placement of riprap will not be placed atop wetland, nor any higher than
the ground elevation of the wetlands (as specified in #1).
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycleo/ to% post-corsumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
September 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Charles R. Fullwood, Jr., Director
Wildlife Resources Commission
Attn: Habitat Conservation Program
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
[DEHNFR
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: N. Hen Moore, Jr. & Stuart B. Moore
PROJECT LOCATION: Off S 309 at Riverside Park near Washington, Beaufort Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct a single family homesite, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed and return this form by
September 24, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please cont4
Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested. y�
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. f=
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
incorporated. See attached.
-"'ENEO
OPT 2 1996
C�thalAi
p,14NAGE1dENi
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
Signed h4, Iti1Q��u^ �s�e� �J wl�•
q- z7-Ay
P.O. Box 27687, Ni
C FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 1, An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Parker, Jr., Coordinator
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management, DEHNR
FROM: William Wescott, Coastal Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: September 27, 1996
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application for N. Henry Moore & Stuart B.
Moore, Riverside Park, Washington, Beaufort County.
Biologists on the Wildlife Resources Commission staff have reviewed this permit
application and are familiar with habitat values of the project area. A site visit was conducted on
September 26, 1996. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Coastal
Area Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as amended, and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicants propose to dredge a boat basin and channel in an existing swamp slough;
construct a pier, access road and boat ramp; and stabilize 250 ft. of shoreline with riprap and 3
groins. Pamlico River is classified as SB by the Environmental Management Commission.
The applicants own a 1.23 acre tract of land off of SR 1309 adjacent to the Pamlico River
in Beaufort County. Of the 1.23 acres, a considerable amount of the property has been
designated as wetlands by the COE. The edge of a sandy ridge sloping down into a swampy area
makes up the upland portion of this property. We support using riprap for shoreline stabilization.
The applicants also state that riprap placed waterward of wetlands will not exceed the ground
elevation of the wetlands.
The applicants refer to the proposed dredging as maintenance excavation of a canal. The
"canal" is actually a narrow shallow slough with shrubby vegetation and trees growing along the

N. Henry Moore 2 September 27, 1996
Sides. The "canal' averages 20 ft. wide and 16 inches deep. The applicants propose to excavate
the "canal' to 37 ft. wide and 4 ft. deep as well as a boat basin. The proposed dredging will
impact 12,365 ft' of forested wetlands and shallow water habitat.
Access to the property exists by a private highground road on the west side of the canal,
however, the applicants wish to obtain access from the east side of the canal. The applicants
propose to place a 3 ft. diameter culvert in the 20 ft. wide canal and fill the remaining canal and
adjacent wetlands. If canoes or small jon boats are using this canal then the proposed access road
will block navigation. A 25 ft. long x 15 ft. wide concrete boat ramp is also proposed.
We will not oppose permit issuance if the following recommendations are included as
permit conditions.
rl 1A. The proposed dredging is deleted from the project.
Q\,r, 2. The applicants utilize the existing access road or bridge the canal so not to interfere
with navigation.
3. The contact of wet cement with water has been shown to be toxic to aquatic
organisms in the immediate vicinity. We request that the cement slab for the boat
ramp be poured on an upland site and pushed into place once hardened.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you need further
assistance or additional information, please contact William Wescott at [phone].

State of Carolina
Departm of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of coastai Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary DIV
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
PZL�'.. ! ;7D� �"
0f Fl Iv,i;t;f� 1 ,: t�.L ID E H N FR
September 3, 1996
Ms. Linda Sewall, Director
Division of Environmental Health
FROM: John Parker, Jr. riCVNEU
Major Permits Processing Coordinator _ OCT 161996
fslh. %.T
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
PP \' +.
APPLICANT: N. Henry Moore, Jr. & Stuart B. Moore
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at Riverside Park near Washington, Beaufort Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a single family homesite, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
September 24,1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact John Parker
at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
x This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency, obje/c to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
i3��
ISigned j Date
P.O. Box 27687, 7� FAX [phone]
M C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NA
Voice919-733-2293 (7!f7n'J►! 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
September 13, 1996
IT 1 u 1' I lu
TO: P. A. "Ski" Wojciechowski
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
VX
[DEHNR
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
SEP 1 6199E i v)''
1 i
DMF-PUB. TUSUBLANDS
SEP 25 . �;96
ii:arst iar
APPLICANT: N. Henry Moore Jr. & Stuart B. Moore\'
f
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at Riverside Park near the City of Washington, Beaufort
Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a single family homesite, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or findings on the proposed project as it relates
to matters of public trust. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, contact John
Parker at 733-2293 or the DCM field representative for the project. This form should be used only
for tracking and intra-agency commenting.
REPLY ✓ere are no known public trust conflicts with the project location or-desigm—
There appear to be public trust conflicts that require additional investigation.
Approximately _ days additional review time is needed.
It is recommended that changes be made to the project to reduce or eliminate
public trust conflicts, as discussed in the attached memo.
Signed -6% � Date � Z J9`
P.O. Box 27687, 7� C FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N�
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Vk*
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
September 3, 1996
lU IMM11� I30110I
TO: Mr. Joe Henderson, Acting Director
State Property Office
Department of Administration
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
1�r
EDEHNFR
RECEIVED
OCT 3 1996
GU:aS W
MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: N. Henry Moore, Jr. & Stuart B. Moore
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at Riverside Park near Washington, Beaufort Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct a single family homesite, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by September 24, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact John
Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
^�✓ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
771
N is to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
Signed Date
P.O. Box 27687, N
�,.FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
September 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. John Sutherland, Chief
Water Planning Section
Division of Water Resources
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
EDEHNFR
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: N. He'
e Moore, Jr. & Stuart B. Moore
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at Mverside Park near Washington, B
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct a single family homesite, etc.
OC7G 2%L
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by September 24, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact John
Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
Signed 0.(—, Date Ylal5t
P.O. Box 27687,
N
7`�FAX
�C
FAX[phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
An Equal Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
September 3, 1996
Mr. Larry R. Goode, Phd., P.E.
Highway Administrator
Division of Highways
John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
r�
[DEHNR
Str `un;��ENS
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review,, MRNRCE
N. He Moore, Jr. & Stuart B. Moore < S
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at Riverside Park near Washington, Beaufort Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct a single family family homesite,etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by September 24, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact John
Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
VKThis agency has no comment on the proposed project.
Signed
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
Project for reasons described in the attached comments.
Date
P.O. Box 27687. N
7�L. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 r� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
September 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early
Environmental Review Coordinator
Division of Archives and History
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
INA
/, m
��a
EDEHNFR
SE,Q G�PG���NS
SUBJECT: CAMA/DRED FILL Permit Application Review gP�P
APPLICANT: N. Hen Moore, Jr. &Stuart B. Moore 9
PROJECT LOCATION: Off SR1309 at 'verside Park near Washington, Beaufort Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To construct a single family homesite, etc.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
September 24,1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact John Parker
at 733-2293 when appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY _ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
A This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
Signed Date 7
P.O. Box 27687, '.0 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N�
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / •
Division of Coastal Management _
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N F1
Roger N. Schecter, Director
27 August 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. William McNeil, Director
Division of Community Assistance
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: N. Hen r lvioore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Project Location: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park adjacent the Pamlico River near the City
of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To develop a single family homesite which involves the upgrading of an
existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access road,
and boat ramp.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 17 September 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is
requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the
recommended changes are incorporated. See attached. !I�,
This office objects to the proposed project for reason rib*E/V, D
in the attached comments. SEP 1996
Signed Date A4tllyafdetcPT
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-9
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/10% post -consumer paper

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGENMNr
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Off SR 1309 at Riverside Park near the City of Washington in
Beaufort County
Photo Index - 1995: 100-1062, U19 1989: 2-64-7, M13 1984: 73-580, 013
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,587,600 Y: 647,400 Washington LR
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge and Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 19 August 1996 (Several other visits have
been made with applicants)
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 13 August 1996
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area, Estuarine Waters
(C) Water Dependent: Both
(D) Intended Use: Development of single family homesite with boating access
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - Septic tank
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - Pier, riprap, single family dwelling, culvert, boat ramp
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: ±2'
Source - DCM observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
±2,268 sq. ft.
_±847 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Openwater
±10,367 sq. ft.
2,290 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1.23 acres or nearly the entire site
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SB Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to develop a single family homesite which
involves the upgrading of an existing canal, placement of riprap, the construction of a pier, access
road, and boatramp.

A
N. HENRY MOORE JR. AND STUART B. MOORE
Beaufort County
Environmental setting
The applicant owns a 1.23 acre tract of land off of SR 1309 adjacent to the Pamlico
River in Beaufort County. Of the 1.23 acres, a considerable amount of the property has been
designated as wetlands by the COE. The wetland delineation is shown on Plat No. 2 in the
application package. Historically the property has experienced ongoing erosion along the
Pamlico River, which is evident by an erosion scarp. No shoreline stabilization efforts have
been made until this time. Along the eastern edge of the property a canal is present which
connects to the Pamlico River. The applicants' eastern property line is located within this canal.
The canal, which has a width of ±20", continues past the applicants' property and thus is
adjacent to other properties. The canal has not been maintained in many years and now averages
±1' in depth at normal water. At approximately 100' south of the mouth of the canal the
Pamlico River has a depth of ±4' at NWL. Along a majority of the length of the canal, as
shown on Plats 2 and 3, much of the adjacent areas have been designated as wetlands by the
COE. This area is predominately vegetated with Carex Wp., Virginia Wild Rye Grass, Smart
Weed, Marsh Mallow and many other species. The highground portions of the property is
vegetated with both pines and a variety of hardwood trees.
On 12 July 1996 Hurricane Bertha had a severe impact on the property. Several large
trees have fallen which are crossed throughout the wetland area. Also a rack line indicates that
several feet of water was over much of the property.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing the following:
(1) The placement of riprap along ±154' of shoreline adjacent to the Pamlico River.
This riprap will average ±5' and will be a maximum of ±10' beyond the NWL.
This riprap will extend from the western property line to the mouth of the canal.
Where the riprap is to be waterward of wetland vegetation, it will not be placed
atop the wetlands, nor any higher than the ground elevation of the wetlands.
(2) The placement of riprap along the edge of the proposed widen canal (see #') and
around the proposed boatbasin (see #9). This area of riprap will have a length
of ±195' and it will be placed as close as possible to the toe of the canal edge.
As in #1, since this entire area is bordering wetlands, no riprap will be placed
atop any wetlands nor higher than the ground elevation of the wetlands.
(3) The placement of three riprap groins in the Pamlico River. The locations of these
groins are shown on plat #2. Each groin will extend 15' beyond the NWL. Each
will have a bottom width of 5', a top width of 1.5' and will extend 1.5' above the
NWL.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 2
(4) The construction of a 3.5' wide by 63' long pier with a 16' by 12' L-shaped
platform within the Pamlico River. The location of the pier is shown on plat #2.
(5) The proposed excavation of a ±100' long by ±25' wide access channel in the
Pamlico River to provide better access to the mouth of the existing canal. This
area averages ±3' in depth at normal water and will be excavated to a ±4' depth
at normal water. All spoils are to be placed on highground.
(6) The maintenance excavation of ±392' of canal. The canal averages ±20' in
width, has an existing depth of ±1.3' at normal water and will be excavated to
a depth of -4' at normal water. The canal is shown on Plats 2 and 3. All spoils
are to be placed on highground. It should be noted that a portion of this canal
is on the property of Mr. Perry Fortesque. A letter from Mr. Fortesque is in the
application package giving the applicants permission to work on his property.
(7) The widening of the southern most ±85' of the existing canal. This widening
will extend from the mouth of the canal to the proposed boatbasin (see #9). This
widening will involve the excavation of a ±17' wide strip of wetlands along the
western edge of the existing canal. This area will also be excavated to a depth
of -4' at NWL.
(8) The maintenance excavation of a ±43' long area which has a width of ±9' and
a depth of ± 1.0'. This area is located along the west side of the canal and is
being described as an existing boatbasin on plat #2. The area actually has very
little resemblance to a boatbasin. The area proposed is to be excavated to a
depth of 4' at NWL.. All spoils are to be placed on highground.
(9) The proposed enlarging of the area that is being described as a boatbasin by the
excavation of wetlands on both the north and south sides of the area. The
excavation will result in a 43' long by 21' wide by -4' deep at NWL boatbasin
connected to the existing canal: All spoils will be placed on highground. See
plat #2 for details.
(10) The construction of a dock along the north and west sides of the new boatbasin.
This dock will have a total length of ±60' and will have a width of 2.5". See
plat #2 for details.
(11) The construction of a 25' long by 15' wide concrete boatramp, of which 15' will
extend beyond the NWL. The ramp will be constructed within a wetland area on
the northeast side of the canal (see plat #3). This ramp will result in ±270 sq.
ft. of wetlands to be excavated and ±407 sq. ft. to be filled.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 3
(12) The placement of a fill causeway across the canal to provide access to the
proposed homesite. Present access is now on the west side of the canal,
however, the applicant wishes to obtain access from additional property he owns
on the east side of the canal (see plat #3). The causeway will have a 16' top
width and will be crossing the canal at an area which has a width of ±20'. A 3'
culvert will be placed within the .causeway to allow for continued drainage.
Riprap will be placed atop the pipe on each side of the causeway.
(13) The development of a single family homesite on the highground portion of the
property. As part of the landscaping, the applicant is proposing to fill a ±440
sq. ft. area of isolated wetlands (see plat #3).
Environmental impact
The following environmental impacts will occur:
(1) The placement of riprap to stabilize the shoreline will result in +1.745 sq. ft. of
open water area filled within the Pamlico River and the manmade canal.
(2) The construction of the three groins will result in +225 sq. ft. of open water area
to be filled in the Pamlico River.
(3) The access channel will result in +2.500 sq. ft. of shallow water habitat to be
excavated in the Pamlico River.
(4) The canal widening will result in +1.445 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation to be
excavated on the west side of the canal.
(5) The canal maintenance excavation will result in +7.480 sq. ft. of shallow water
area to be excavated.
(6) The boatbasin maintenance excavation will result in +387 sq. ft. of shallow %rater
area to be excavated.
(7) The enlarging of the boatbasin will result in +553 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation
to be excavated.
(8) The placement of the boatramp will result in +270 sq. ft. of wetland vegetation
being excavated.
(9) The placement of the proposed boatramp will result in +407 sq. ft. of wetland
vegetation being filled.

N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Page 4
(10) The proposed causeway will result in +320 sq. ft. of open water area in the
existing canal to be filled. Also, this causeway will not allow any navigation
beyond this point to other properties.
(11) The landscaping will result in +440 sq. ft. of isolated wetlands to be filled.
David L. Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 26 August 1996

r
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO October 15, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014
N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Post Office Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Messrs. Moore:
On August 29, 1996, you applied for Department of the Army (DA)
authorization to undertake excavation and filling activities within
Section 404 Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands, and facilitate
development of a single family homesite, including the construction of an
access road, pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp, and the placement
of riprap, on property located off State Road 1309, adjacent the Pamlico
River, near the City of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina.
After review of your proposal, the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service recommended modification of your application by letter dated
October 4, 1996 (copy enclosed). These recommendations are due to anticipated
adverse environmental impacts.
Our administrative process provides you the opportunity to propose a
resolution and/or to rebut any and all objections before a final decision is
made. In this regard, I would appreciate being made aware of your intentions,
in writing, on or before October 24, 1996.
Mr. Raleigh Bland of the Washington Regulatory Field Office Branch,
telephone [phone], extension 23, is responsible for processing your
application and is available to assist you in coordinating with the review
agencies.
Sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
�r
John Parker
Division of Coastal Management �� OCT 1 ;936
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ,+i, w4 C+�^47
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

V
-2
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Water Management Division - Region IV
Wetlands Protection Section
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
100 Alabama Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

C", of f�f
4
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE �-
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 M
In Reply Refer To:
R4/FWS/AES/RAMC
October 4, 1996
Lieutenant Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth
District Engineer, Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 24802-1890
Attention: Raleigh Bland
Dear Colonel Youngbluth:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the Field
Investigation Report (FIR) and permit application for Action I.D.
No. 199605014. The applicants, N. Henry Jr. and Stuart B. Moore,
propose to stabilize a length of the Pamlico River's shoreline on
their property and backfill the open water and wetland areas
landward of the stabilization project, construct groins, a boat
basin, boat ramp, docking facility and filled canal crossing, and
to widen and deepen a neglected canal adjacent to a tract of land
off SR 1309 in Beaufort County, North Carolina. The dredging and
widening activities would be conducted by backhoe working from the
sides of the canal. No mitigation for sedimentation is proposed.
About 2,268 sq. ft. of vegetated wetlands and 10,367 sq, ft. of
open water areas would be dredged, and over 3,000 sq. ft. of those
habitat types wold be filled under the proposal. The applicants
stated purpose is to construct a homesite on the tract of land.
This is the report of the Service submitted pursuant to, and in
accordance with, provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48'Stat. 401, as amended;l6 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
We recommend that the District Engineer seek extensive
modifications of the proposed activities. It appears that most of
the facilities the applicant proposes can be constructed on high
ground, and that a majority of the anticipated impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands can be avoided on the available property.
We recommend that the boat basin, dock, and access channel be
excavated from the non -wetland area along the western property line
(south of the "proposed house") depicted on plat No. 1. The
shoreline immediately adjacent to this excavated access channel,
and the new channel itself, can be protected with riprap. This

simple re -arrangement does not impact the applicant's house or
overall development plans, yet avoids almost all of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and open water habitat.
Further, the proposed boat ramp should be designed and constructed
in the excavated boat basin. Lastly, while we recognize the
utility of the proposed access road and canal crossing, we are
concerned that a small culvert may impair water flow and impede
passage by some aquatic organisms. Therefore, we recommend that
the fill and culvert be installed in the dry, and removed (also in
the dry), within one year of installation. The access road -should
cross the canal via a bridge which spans the canal and as much of
the wetlands as possible.
It is important to note that houselots such as the applicant's have
historically been created, in whole or in part, by filling wetlands
or littoral zones. If this is true in this case, the "ongoing
erosion" -observed at the site can be considered reclamation of
aquatic habitat, albeit accentuated by boat traffic and other
anthropogenic causes. It is evident from the FIR that the site is
part of the Pamlico River's floodplain. In either case, the
baseline for protective structures such as riprap should be the
current plane of ordinary high water. This baseline is important
to consider because any shoreline stabilization attempts waterward
of it have a reduced probability of longterm success.
By proposing to stabilize the shoreline so far waterward from the
current baseline, the applicant may be designing the site in a
manner counter to the river's hydrologic forces. This means the
periodicity and magnitude of maintenance activities will probably
be greater than if the current baseline had been used in the
design. These episodic maintenance activities each have some
adverse impact on fish and wildlife resources. They represent a
cumulative (temporal) adverse impact.
The proposed activities can be modified to avoid impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and aquatic habitat, and such modifications
would probably reduce cumulative impacts as well. The Service
believes that the applicant should modify the permit application as
we have described above.
We appreciate this opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you
have any questions or comments, please call Kevin Moody of my staff
at [phone] extension 19.
Sincerely,
ohn M�Hefflzer
Field Supervisor

CC: NCDCM, Raleigh, NC (John Parker)
NCWRC, Raleigh, NC (Frank McBride)
EPA, Wetlands Regulatory Program, Atlanta, GA (Thomas Welborn)
NMFS, Beaufort, NC (Larry Hardy)
FWS/R4:KMoody:KM/10/01/96:919/856-4520 ext.19:B:\Moore

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICTCO, CORPS OF ENGINEERS I/\
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
REPLYTO
ATTENTION OF
October 1, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014
N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Post Office Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Messrs. Moore:
On August 29, 1996, you applied for Department of the Army (DA)
authorization to undertake excavation and filling activities within
Section 404 Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands, and facilitate
development of a single family homesite, including the construction of an
access road, pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp, and the placement
of riprap, on property located off State Road 1309, adjacent the Pamlico
River, near the City of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina.
After review of your proposal, the National Marine Fisheries Service
recommended modification of your application by letter dated September 27,
1996 (copy enclosed). These recommendations are due to anticipated adverse
environmental impacts.
Our administrative process provides you the opportunity to propose a
resolution and/or to rebut any and all objections before a final decision is
made. In this regard, I would appreciate being made aware of your intentions,
in writing, on or before October 15, 1996.
Mr. Raleigh Bland of the Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone], is
responsible for processing your application and is available to assist you in
coordinating with the review agencies.
sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
John Parker
ivlsion nof Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687OC]�e�F� v
Raleigh,'North Carolina 27611-7687
�9�cF�F 60

-2-
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
100 Alabama Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS C 0�
P.O. BOX 1890 J
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO September 4, 1996
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and atural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Please reference the application of N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
for Department of the Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to undertake excavation and filling activities within Section
404 Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands, and facilitate development
of a single family homesite, including the construction of an access road,
pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp, and the placement of riprap, on
property located off State Road 1309, adjacent the Pamlico River, near the
City of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this
letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in
accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water
quality certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the
same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has been obtained or waived.
According to our administrative regulations, 60 days is reasonable for
State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by November 3, 1996, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
M John Parker
ivision of Coastal Management
orth Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687 j
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
cc sF,,1�fI ZY
C' Z 19
C'4yGf fN 96

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
REPLYTO
ATTENTION OF
September 4, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199605014
N. Henry, Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Post Office Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Messrs. Moore:
On February 11, 1991, we renewed General Permit No. 198000291 (copy
enclosed), which provides Federal authorization for construction activities
that receive authorization from the State of North Carolina.
A review of your application received August 29, 1996, for Department of
the Army (DA) authorization to undertake excavation and filling activities
within Section 404 Department of the Army jurisdictional wetlands, and
facilitate development of a single family homesite, including the construction
of an access road, pier, boatramp, access channel, and boatramp, and the
placement of riprap, on property located off State Road 1309, adjacent the
Pamlico River, near the City of Washington, Beaufort County, North Carolina,
indicates it to be a candidate for Federal authorization under this general
permit. Accordingly, the administrative processing of your application will
be accomplished by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management.
Comments from Federal review agencies will be furnished to the State.
If your application must be withdrawn from this general permit process
for any reason, you will be informed regarding its further management. If
there are no unresolved differences in State -Federal positions or policies,
the final action taken on your application by the State will result in your
receiving written notice from us that your application is consistent with the
general permit and you may commence your activity. Only after receiving such
confirmation should you begin work.
Your application, pursuant to Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act and
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, has been assigned Action ID No. 199605014.
It will be coordinated by Mr. Raleigh Bland in our Washington Regulatory Field
Office. Mr. Bland is available at telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure

-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Nivision of Coastal Management
orth Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region Iv
Wetlands, Oceans and watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Terry Moore, District Manager
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, North Carolina 27889-2188
RfcErVED
1. 4- SEp 1� 199
MANAG6.r4L s

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY /
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOXC 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH AROROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO C I Gp
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 111 L S-01 LI
Waterway I &VnLd R'Oy"
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries
Service, NOAA
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
U. S.Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Applicant 4nn, 4l qut'4 Mobrt
County u r T Type Work�fi+Jbblt ro
IPI
ir
Mr. John Parker
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section -Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Gentlemen:
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
r. M e
Regional Office
Divisio of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Heallth and
Natural Resouur�ces A
y1 CA"I( I v"Ut
r»6 n L 11 bel
Pursuant to Action ID No. 198000291, the CAMA-Corps general permit/processing
agreement, a State Field Investigation Report is encloseSi, J(qur comments rd/or
recommendations would be appreciated on or before (/C+ `f (�
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington Regulatory
Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
r*f*'C41"'�f4Z1'996
Raleigh Bl d Regulatory Project Manager
NT
Enclosure

Action ID:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
County: ReCia/�
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
Property owner/Authorized Agent
Address -- 1(a % 1/li-,c I// �� 1 'p i) �� r ScF
Z
Telephone Number_ ea 62 _ 3,51
Size an6 d Location of Property(waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.)
A,I
Indicate Which of the following apply:
a I :
• There a wetlands on t e above describe property which a strongly su est should a delineated and
surveye The survey wetland lines m st be verified by ur staff befo�e the Corp will make a final
jurisdic oval determi tion on your prop rty.
• 'Because of a size of your operty and o r resent workload, o r identiflca on and Jelin anon of your
wetlands c nnot be accomp i, in a and
manner. You may 'sh to em oy a consul nt to obtain a
more time delineation of a wetlands. On a your consultant s flagged a etland line n the property,
Corps sta will review it, d, if it is accurat , we strongly reco mend that ou have the ine surveyed for
final app val by the Corp[. The Corps will of make a final jun ictional d terminatio on your property
without In approved survey.
The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have been explained
`]V!� to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed4hFoe years from the date of this notification.
• Th re are no Hands pr ent fl"2 the bove descry ed property which are//��ubject Athr
e p rmit
req irements of ection 404 of the Clean ater Ay (3USC 1p344)Unless thgfe is a chan t e law
or ur published egulations this deter minion ma be lied u on f a period ( t to ex years
fro the date o this notific tion.
r •�Ttte project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of
Coastal Management to determine their requirements. Cc1(4)q rf'6 _ 6491
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the Army
permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A permit is
not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you have any
questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
R:(1 9:J fN at ftyl g75'16 16 l:xf Z%
Property owner/Authorized Agent Signature
Project Manager Signature wie4 !,l %s,,%,f
Date 71106 Expiration Date
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
CFSAW PC. 566
1 OCr 92

NOTIFICATION FORM
INFORMATION SHEET
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
A. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISTRICT ENGINEER. (REFER TO
ITEM B. BELOW FOR DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICATION RE-
QUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICALLY NOTE NWP 26 DIFFERENCE.)
Certain nationwide permits require notification to the Corps of Engineers before work can proceed. They are as follows:
NWP 5 (only for discharges of 10 to 25 cubic yards)
NWP7
NWT 13 (only for stabilization activities in excess of 500 feet in length or greater than an average of one cubic yard
per running foot)
> NWP 14 (only for fills in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, and must include a delineation of affected special
aquatic sites)
NWT 17
> NWP 18 (required when discharge exceeds 10 cubic yards or the discharge is in a special aquatic site and must include
a delineation of the affected special aquatic site, including wetlands)
NWP 21 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
NWT 26 (only for greater than 1 acre total impacts and must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites,
including wetlands)
NWP 33 (must include a restoration plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic resources)
NWP 37
NWP 38 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
For activities that may be authorized by the above listed nationwide permits that require notification, the
applicant shall not. begin work
a. Until notified that the work may proceed under the nationwide permit with any special conditions imposed by
the District Engineer, or
b. If notified that an individual permit may be required, or
c. Unless 30 days (calendar) have passed from the time a complete notification is receivedby the District Engineer
and no notice has been received from the District Engineer, and required state approvals have been obtained.
Required state approvals include: 1) a Section 401 water quality certification if authorization is requested for a
discharge of dredged or fill material, and 2) an approved coastal zone management consistency determination if
the activity will affect the coastal area.
Use of NWP 12 also requires notification to the District Engineer, but work may not begin until written
concurrence is received from the District Engineer. The time periods described above do not apply.
Furthermore, requirements to notify the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), as indicated below and on the
notification form, do not apply.
B. APPLICATION TO DEM FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION.
Certain nationwide permits require an application to DEM in order to obtain Section 401 water quality certification.
They are NWP 6, NWP 12, NWP 15, NWP 16, NWP 17, NWP 21, NWP 33,.NWP 34, NWP 38, and NWP 40.
Certain nationwide permits were issued general certifications and require no application. They are NWP 3, NWP 4,
NWP 5, NWP 7, NWP 20, NWP 22, NWP 23 (requires notification to DEM), NWP 25, NWP 27, NWP 32, NWP 36,
and NWP 37.
The following nationwide permits were issued general certifications for only limited activities: NWP 13 (for projects
less than 500 feet in length), NWP 14 (for projects that impact waters only), NWP 18 (for projects with less than 10
cubic yards of fill in waters only), and NWT 26 (for projects with less than or equal to one-third acre fill of waters or
wetlands). Projects that do not meet these criteria require application for Section 401 water quality certifications.

C. NOTIFICATION/APPLICATION PROCEDURES.
The- attached form should be used to obtain approval from the Corps of Engineers and/or the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management as specified above. The permittee should make sure that all necessary information is
provided in order to avoid delays. One copy of the completed form is required by the Corps of Engineers and seven
copies are required by DEM. Plans and maps must be on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper.
Endangered species requirement: For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the presence of endangered species that may
be affected by the proposed project.
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
RALEIGH FIELD OFFICE
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone [phone]
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
HABITAT CONSERVATION DIVISION
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone [phone]
Historic resources requirement: For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the State Historic
Preservation Office regarding the presence of historic properties that may be affected by the proposed project.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
N.C. DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone [phone]
Information obtained from these agencies should be forwarded to the Corps.

DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
A=: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7),COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name:
2. Owners Address:
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County:
Nearest Town or City:
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks,
6. Name of Closest Stream/River.
7. River Basin:
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS H? YES [ ] NO [ ]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [ ]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S:, including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
TotalImoa

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2" X IV drawings only):
13. Purpose of proposed'
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered orthreatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES[ ] NO[ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D.' If a.stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
Owner's Signature Date

10/31/1996
MR.DAVE GOSSET
N.C.DIVISION OF
P.O.BOX 2188
WASHINGTON,N.C.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
327889 2188
DEAR MR. GOSSET;
ATTACHED ARE REVISED PLATS 2,3 AND 5 FROM OUR APPLICATION A6,0,e,SV
,L� ��/�—) THAT REFLECT THE CHANGES DISCUSSED WITH YOU,
r! j EIGH BLAND AND BILL BIDDLECOME, WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS,
AT OUR MEETING ON 10/28/96 AT THE SITE.
THE CHANGES ARE AS FOLLOWS;
1- REMOVE PROPOSED BOAT BASIN FROM WETLAND ON PLAT 2 AND PLACE
IN HIGHLAND AS SHOWN ON PLAT 3
2- REDUCE AMOUNT OF WETLAND EXCAVATION AS SHOWN ON PLAT 2 TO
ONLY 741 SQ. FT.
3- REPLACE ROCK GROINS AND SHORELINE STABILIZATION WITH WOOD
GROINS AND BULKHEADS. BULKHEADS IN WETLAND WILL NOT BE BACK
FILLED AND WILL BE THE HEIGHT OF THE WETLAND.
4- CHANGE CULVERT TO A BRIDGE FOR ROAD CROSSING THE CANAL AS
SHOWN ON PLATS 3 AND 5
STUART B. MOORE
�NRY RE JR.
P.O.BOX 54
WASHINGTON N.C. 27889

Environmental Health Section
Permit # N0- 0347 Beaufort County Health Department
P.O. Box 579
Washington, North Carolina 27889
[phone]
IMPROVEMENTS PERMIT
Improvements Permit subject to revocation if the site plans or intended use char
Owner or G
Address:
Subdivision:
State Road f
Number: .
Directions:
Property Size: Type Structure: f1trMAL
No. Bedrooms: No. People:
Water Supply: / _ (Maintain minimum L_feet
separation from any part of septic system and repair area.)
Classification: [] Suitable provisionally Suitable [I PS with fill
Additional Drainage:
Seasonal Wetness Condition: 3L Soil Type: T' Ir
Septic Tank: 4O00 gal. Pump Tank:_gal.
Nitrification Field: y i LU square feet
i}vYJAtu/:a.� 1 wi 7ev—t* 'O' /A %Is 5 ff ` fl.
Additional forUall systems: Landscape system area for surface water runoff and
grass. Do not place drive or any building over the system area or repair area. I
Observe all proper setbacks (10 NCAC 10A .1950). Do not work soil or install
system in wet conditions. This permit must be on site during installation and
inspection.
Environmental Health Specialist �Gl ttF �try'^ o Lti't
Piew Construction
[I Repair
[] Existing System
or slte,altcrations occur.
Site
AUTHORIZATION FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION
(Authorization For Wastewater System Construction is valid for five years from date of issuance.)
Owner or Co ctRr: /Tv..�..�,, /1't cv-u- Phone �f 46 S 2 S 7
Address: /'e' Zt , r t t V C- .2 7 VL"I
Subdivision: Lot Number:
State Road Number 3tiI Directions: N. N °
arc' f2 C5c I-.-L
Properly Size: [ 3 Type Structure.z-
Environmental Health Specialist:.b e;LvC �ey"yl t" Date: 2
While — Owner/Contractor Yellow — Health Department Pink — Building Inspections
0347

m SENDER:
' y m
•Complete items 1 andror2 for additional services.
•Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
•Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
1!
card to you.
•Attach this farm to the front of the mallpiece, or an the bark if space does not
permit.
o • Wdte'Refum Recelpt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number.
•The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivared.
0
a 3. ArfiCie Addresse t r
E l� P�r1'y
Ir
N �� � r
w�/� G� Ne,��-�
C
a
2 5. cefved By: (Print Name)
g 6. Signature ddressee r fl
a X
PS Fo 381 . De. mhar A
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑Addressee's Address
Lu
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
0
Consult Postmaster for fee.
a
4a. Artclg N�mber l
m
d
4b. Service Type
❑ RegisteredCe'rtifiett
¢
❑ Express Mai i ❑Insured
c
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
m
0
7. Date of Delivery
i
0
0
d.Ad ressee' Address( Illyilrequested
T
and fee Is paid)
t
F
m SENDER:
v •Complateitems l and1cr2 foraddxional services.
o+ •Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
my •Prim your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum thle
d card to you.
'Attach thie form to the horn of the mallplece, or an the back if space does not
permit.
m •Wdte'Refum Receipt Requesfed'on the mailpiece below the anicle number.
$ •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
C delivered.
0
v 3. Article Addresses
0 /
N
W
10
Z
m S. Rec Ved Bpi ( n
. ig ature: (Addre
r X
a
9 V-
�G
PS Form 3811, December 1994
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
❑ Registered Cerfified
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
and fee is paid)
m SENDER:
v •Complete Items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
m •Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
m • Print your name and address on the reverse of this forth so that we can return this
`2 card to you.
Mach this torn to the front of the mallplace, or on the back if space does not
permit.
m •Wdte'Remm Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number.
•The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
0
a 3. Article Addressed to:
o �t AP h
WG� q%�
all 0,0
5. Receive
6. Signatui
°a X�
A
or
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
30b/<3OV
❑ Registered
❑ Express Mail
❑ Retum Reoeipl for Merchandise
and fee Is paid)
9-te—rgfied
❑ Insured
❑ COD
PS Form 3
, December 1994

I
a soH acalGe'ifie' "-..
1 enNor2lpretldieoiui aeMue. w-�q
3.4.." non We revere of Loam " Iwe,
andadclr
tp We front of 111e maldeu, or�JNei vrkll eDeu9ioea nM
We Cd;
pr Reeuosfee'u MOO.,
below Ne editlynumber. ''¢,'j]1lastdgetl'6ellv0ry """'N—'
al,pl"sh", onmas eniGew da me We axle Consl uI05t0 r for fee. ,
V
dell eW- v
0 4a. rticle Number E
y 3. Article Ar"Sd I I r/ 1 NE
�S art Yi!/FI
n 4b. SeMce Ty x
❑ Registered Nfied m
Z� ❑Express Mail [I Insured m
O u'
❑Return Recelplfor MemdanNse O COD
p 7. Data of Delivery 'o
5. ReceHetl By: (PdntNeme) a. tlressea's Address (Only" requested n
and fee Is paid)
6. Sign : (Addressee o nfl
r X
o, Domestic Return Receipt
PS Form 3811, DWOM061 1ee4
First -Class Mail
UNITED STATES PO$Tu SERVICE f all I I I .- -- U6 Sga-B Fit. Peai ,
JN:, 7I
Permit No.G-10 v
• Print your n ' rye, addrP,sgi nd ZIP Code in this box •
ofl

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mall
Postage 8 Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Printyour nfirrie, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
Al, 1-1-e- n 7 Al
Ptd, �fl�
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First Class
Mall
Postage & Fe as Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
• Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
/ ° t Ao- 14199i—f-
G)
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS;
Permit No. G-10
• Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
yr
1

o- SENDER:
v •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
ro -Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
'�
following services (for an
•Print your name and address on the reverse of this fans so that we can return this
card to
extra fee ) m
yyoou.
:Attach this form to the from of the mallpiece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
Permit.
m •WeReturn Rooster Requestowhothe below the ericanumber.
2.❑RBStriGedDBtiVBry y
earticle
eThe Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the data
i delivered.
Consult for fee. a
c
postmaster
.� 3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
C! a /oO O 4
ZIa3 EaL7
C
o
4b. Service Type
' o 2 D �O K / LPL 2 9 3
d
❑Registered � 's_ t�'jCert(fi ¢ . '
101
i'W S AllerS.60r F/4
❑ Express Mail ❑Insure 'm
�
.,. c .. .9 �
[3 Return Receipt for Merchandise El COD
c'' g373.3-
7.Dateof.D
UTry7
ir
Z 1990 O.
j
I 5. Received By: (Print Name)
8. Addressee's Address (Only(lrequested
.
and fee is paid) r
.;.:_f,- 0 -'6. Signatur ( dd ssee or Agent)
~
m
} — PS Form 3811, Decem er 1994 ' ' I t i i I1 Domestic Return Receipt
a�
o SENDER:
v •Complete hems 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
4 •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. -
m
following services (for an
•Print your name and address on the reverse of this forth so that we can return this
card to you.
extra fee):
' •Attach this forth to the front of the mailplece, or on the bark if space does not
Permit.
ai
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
Z
m •Wdte'Refum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
2..❑ Restricted Delivery .N
r HThe Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
c
Consult postmaster for fee.
-a 3. Article Addressed to:
bk
4a. Article Number d
zo341V OE
' re7 e✓ Cd x
8
E ' " '
4b. Service Type
nn
o' %ZS,3ee Gnroh /�,c�.
❑ Regis red ff��ertified
J❑3
h e wh %�/, �-'
❑ Expressman Insured A
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
.i 27 ff 6�
..
7. Date off Delivery
J' y� m
'?o /Y'..o , i.
5. ace
a ((ntN e)
a.Addressee's Address .(Onlytl requested c
and fee Is paid) t
~ .
g _6.Sig-atur : A dresseeo Agent)
t. X
m
1..
PS Form 3811, December 1994 Domestic Return Receipt
SENDER:
to •Complete items 1 andfor 2 for additional services.
m i,Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
!' m •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
card to you.
J MAaach this torn to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
m pemtit.
m sWrite'Refum Receipt Requasfed'on the mailpiece below the article number.
$ •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
C delivered.
3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article IN
a Z "
o oevstg c Y � `' , u 4b. Service
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
ai
2
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
y ,
Consult postmaster for fee.
a{
u (j9
�! O, ri p el, O y ❑Registered
W A' 0 Express Mall
•o uK on/ /V 27920 ❑ Return Receipt for
. ` C - 7. Date of Delivery
5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Add
and fee Is paid)
g 6. Signatur • dressee or Agent) _
0
T
ar
x
o r79 /
C '
E
m'
/§jjjjjj'''
CInsure:ure d
d
mrn
rise ❑ COD
`o
2
e'
T
glyl! quested
t`
PS Form 3811, De mber1094

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage &Fees Paid
- - PeirnitNo. G-10
• Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
s'7�v0.0- ��o k-
`/ D/ V�tr1 C e r v
I'
lillillitlilt [lilt IIIIILIII 1111nllulLill IIIIIlilt lilt III II
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage &Fees Paid
USPS
Permit NoG-10
C• Print your name, address,
and ZIP Code in this box •
/door -e
PostMail
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
O U N r
- - F M "\
- .. Postage-& ga-&, Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10 `
• Print your n %e„gddres�y nd ZIP Code in this box •
J / o
0/7 U�nCG bcr1: e
larlwro/ N.�2 7$'� C

EM
THIS DEED, Made and executed this /;2 day of , 1975,
and between Holman Frederick Cox and wife, Nadine Rice Cox, as parties of
Holman Frederick -Cox, a life estate for and during the tw n
his natural life with the remainder interest in fee over to Gay Ianne Cox,
cy Holman Cox, Casey Ray Cox, and Jan Marie Mclillion, as parties of the
Part, all parties of Beaufort County, North Carolina.
W I T N E S S E T H:
That the parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the
a of $10.00 and other valuable considerations to them paid by the parties of
second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have bargained
1 sold, and by these presents do hereby bargain, sell and convey unto the
A Holman Frederick Cox for and during the term of his natural life with the
aiider interest in fee over to Gay Ianne Cox, Tracy Holman Cox, Casey Ray
and Jan Marie Fbllillion, their heirs and assigns, certain tracts or parcels
land lying and being in long Acre Township, Beaufort County, North Carolina
more particularly described as follows:
FIRST PARCEL: BEGINJIN33 at an iron marker in the northern sideline
the public road running from State Road No. 1315 toward the Pamlico River,
ch marker is at the edge of a canal and in the center of an old road; thence
h the canal north 470 east 390.4 feet to a corner; thence north 430 west
feet; thence north 660 15' west 146 feet; thence north 150 45' west 100
t; thence north 10 30' east 116 feet to an iron marker; thence south 530
west 257 feet to an iron marker in the center of an old road; thence with
center of an old road south 530 30' east 257 feet to an imn marker; thence
11 with the center of said old mad south 9" east 468 feet to the point of
inning, and being shwa on a map containing 2.9 acres and being the same
conveyed to H. Bridget Cox by Elsie V. Hodges (widow) by deed dated June 19,
9 of record in Book 644 at page 26, Beaufort County Registry, to which map
deed reference is herein made and incorporated for a more complete and
ailed description.
SECOND PARCEL: BEGINNING at an imn marker, the souUmest corner of
e H. Bridget Cox land of record in Book 644 at page 26, Beaufort County
gistry, said marker being indicated on the map attached in deed of record in
ok 662 at page 147, Beaufort County Registry by the letter "A"; and running
ence south 90 east 2 feet to the norihtern right of way of State Road 1313;
ence along said road south 700 east 30 feet to a stake; thence north 90 west 2
et to a stake; thence north 570 30' east 352 feet to a ditch, Jack Douglas'
ne; thence along said ditch north 360 west 75 feet to another ditch, the line
H. Bridget Cox; thence along said ditch south 470 west 380 feet to the point
beginning, containing 0.38 acres, as surveyed by Blake C.Lewis, December 20,
70, excepting an easement or right of way 15 feet in width extending along
-
e southeastern line of the parcel herein conveyed and being the same as
mreyed by H. Bridget Cox by Mary Beckwith lbore (widow) by deed dated December

1970 of record in. Book 662 at page 147, Beaufort (3ounty Registry, to wh
.renee is herein made and.incorporated for a more complete and detailed
1D HAVE AND TO HOLD'the aforesaid tracts or parcels of laird together
all privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise
unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns,
in fee simple, subject only to the life estate heminbefore reserved for
Frederick Cox.
And the parties of the first part covenant that they are seized
of said premises in fee and have the right to conv@y the same in fee simple;
that the same is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; and that they
do hereby forever warrant and will. defend the title to the said property agai
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties f the first part have
their hands and seals the day and year firstjabove wrWao;
`+ - N, NORTH CAROLila
BFAUEDRT CDLrnY
E�Before me,•f)(ar.. /7`f<!L' e , a notary public,
••o this day personally app dolman 17ederick Cox and arJmoirledged the due
execution of the foregoing deed for the uses and purposes therein expressed.
_ I1975WITNESS my Nana and notarial seal this o'I_ day oC Wi:.<2�a,:! ,
c � I. �--
o ^�
NOTARY PUBLIC '.'.l F•, .,,.
MY commission expires -Iv -//-ZY ....
NORTH CAROLIM
IBFAUFORT COUNTY
��f..
ate Before me, _,/ r(cL•n. ,� % .:�'circ„i , a notary public,
odd d a" I this day personally appeared N`�a3.ne xroe Cox arid acknowledged the due execution
of the foregoing deed for the uses and purposes therein expressed.
CF�4.F
z .; WITNESS my hand and notarial seal this IL -_day of �Q�Ay- ,
1975.
N0 PUBISC f• .i• ri t
IMy conu.mission expires: /o-//--7
0 Lf,
t

MAYO 6 MAYO
.....En AT us
V".'NaTON. No
F11111.UFi71'C109
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
THIS DEED, Made and entered into this the �v day of
1996, by and between JAN MARIE MCMILLION and husband,
PHIL MCMILLION, of Cary, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to
as the parties of the first part; to CASEY RAY COX, of P. 0. Box
604, Buxton, North Carolina 27920-0604, hereinafter referred to
as the party of the second part;
W 1 T W& S S E T d:
That the said parties of the first part in
consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and
valuable consideration to them in hand paid by said party of the
second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have
bargained and sold and by these presents, do bargain, sell and
convey an undivided one-fourth (1/4) interest unto the said party
of the second part, his heirs and assigns, in the following
parcels or tracts of land in Long Acre Township, Beaufort County,
North Carolina, more particularly describedas follows:
FIRST PARCEL: BEGINNING at an iron marker in the
Northern side line of the public road running from State Road
1315 toward the Pamlico River, which marker is at the edge of a
canal and in the center of an old road; thence with the canal
North 47° East 390.4 feet to a corner; thence North 43" West 304
feet; thence North 66- 151 West 146 feet; thence North 15° 451
West 100 feet; thence North 1° 30' East 116 feet to an iron
marker; thence South 53" 451 West 257 feet to an iron marker in
the center of an old road; thence with the center of an old road
South 53° 301 East 257 feet to an iron marker; thence still with
the center of said old road South 9- East 468 feet to the point
of beginning and being shown on a map containing 2.9 acres and
the same as the First Parcel conveyed to Gay Ianne Cox at al
subject to the life estate of Holman Frederick Cox by deed dated
August 12, 1975 of record in Beck 733, Page 404, Beaufort County
Registry, to which map and deed reference is herein made and
incorporated for a more complete and detailed description.
SECOND PARCEL: BEGINNING at an iron marker, the
Southwest corner of the H. Bridget Cox land of record in Book
BFAUFORT COUNTY LAND RECORDS
LR'FORMCOL 8 d9;3 9 BLAVFORF COUNTY BS-14-96
ACCEPTED
STATE OF $8.00
Land Records Official D�,� 9� EJaOjjNA `�,i Real Estate
CAI Excise Tax

z
MAYO 6 MAYO
ATTORNEY! AT EARN
WA9NIN6TON. NO
B.',1047ro110
644, page 26, Beaufort County Registry, said marker being
Indicated on the map attached in Deed of record in Book 662, Page
147, Beaufort county Registry, by the letter "A"; and running
thence South 9- East 2 feet to the Northern right of way of SR
1313; thence along said road South 70- East 30 feet to a stake;
thence North 9- West 22 feet to a stake; thence North 570 30•
East 352 feet to a ditch, Jack Douglas' line; thence along field
ditch North 36" West 75 feet to another ditch, the line of H.
Bridget Cox; thence along said ditch South 470 West 380 feet to
the point of beginning, containing 0.38 acres as ..surveyed by
Blake C. Lewis, December 20, 1970, excepting an easement or right
of way 15 feet in width extending along the Southeastern line of
the parcel herein conveyed and being the same as the Second
Parcel conveyed to Gay Ianne Cox at al subject to the life estate
of Holman Frederick Cox by deed dated August 12, 1975 of record
in Book 733, Page 404, Beaufort County Registry, to which map and
deed reference is herein made and incorporated for a more
complete and detailed description.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the undivided one-fourth interest
in the aforesaid tracts or parcels of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereunto belonging unto the said party of the
second part and his heirs and assigns forever, SUBJECT TO the
life estate of Holman Frederick Cox reserved in Deed of record in
Book 733, Page 404, Beaufort County Registry.
And the said parties of the, first part do covenant that
they are seized of said premises in fee and have the right to
convey an undivided one-fourth interest in the same in fee
simple, that the same is free from incumbrances, SUBJECT TO the
life estate of Holman Frederick Cox reserved in Deed of record in
Book 733, Page 404, Beaufort County Registry and SUBJECT TO 1996
ad valorem taxes, and that, subject thereto, they will warrant
and defend the title to the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first
part have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year
first above written.
J MARIE MCMILLION—(5)
I

l 9_ x4
t �
coy
csEA%1
PHIL MCMILLION
- -
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
* a , a Notary Public inandfor the..
I, -Zelda —df
County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that JAN MARIE
HCMILLION personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged
the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes
thttv*ll `'LNpressed.
�4 e q
this the IOu day
YTAtfiess my hand and Notarial Seal, of �
1996.
�C�,;•PV©61t:2 ^" NOTARY PUBLIC
.:
F}�yCl n Y $,Expires: eOv— 2 _•
I IIIIIIIIIII\�YAA
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Glib kr
I, A"/,ac /-ll,l s/i,, , a Notary
Public in and for the County and State aforesa d, do hereby
certify that PHIL MCMILLION personally appeared before me this
'
day and acknowledged the due _execution of the foregoing
instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Witness my hand and Notarial Seal, this thd;!-.,f9-<<•1k2ft 'Pf
CA
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires: %-�-r15 'c'^''' ....•'_
North Caroline
W1"•
IIeecLort Coup tJ
icate _
The foregoicg CertifoertUl—
to be COYTcOt
^ct-rc•IIn*^] inillotnT. n��i fororeristration and recording
.,-r
l �,;:•. T logo LrL•
t IFcoti / �%, A•'
In thi^. o:'fir• S o'rine
19
j!fze da9 of '
This by Deeds
Resist
N]rk A. Niselle ]t.6ieter o
q, j,tor of Deeds
MAYO A MAYO
W.R.11. AT Us
WAeHIAYICA. KC

MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Mulligan
Deborah Sawyer
FROM: David Gossett
DATE: 27 August 1996
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Permit and/or Dredge & Fill Permit
N. Henry Moore Jr. and Stuart B. Moore
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Attached is an application for a CAMA Major and/or a Dredge & Fill permit which was
received by me on 13 August 1996. I am considering this application complete, acknowledged
receipt, and have begun processing.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LT 11TATA
Health and Natural Resources 4 0
Division of Coastal Management r
tiv f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor r k AMEN�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N F1
Roger N. Schecter, Director
21 August 1996
Mr. Stuart B. Moore and
Mr. N. Henry Moore Jr.
Post Office Box 54
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your
application for State approval for development of your property located off SR
1309 at Riverside Park adjacent to the Pamlico River in Beaufort County, North
Carolina. It was received on 13 August 1996 and appears to be adequate for
processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is 27
October 1996. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such
time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a
final action by the initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review
period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will also serve as your
notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on
or about the 75th day. Should there be any questions on this procedural change,
do not hesitate to contact me.
N.C.G.S. 113A-119(b) requires that notice of an application be posted at
the location of the proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of
Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at the property of your proposed
development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along your
property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be:
nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way
fronting your property, or at a point along the road right-of-way where a private
road would lead one into your property. Failure to poet this notice could result
in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made and if additional information is
required, you will be contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency.
Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in writing if you wish
to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
cer
S ' sly
David L. Gossett
Field Representative
DLG/pdp
ENCLOSURE
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/l 0% post -consumer paper

14 MAY 1996
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN ;
I,PERRY FORTISCUE,HEREBY AUTHORIZE N. HENRY MOORE AND STUART
B.MOORE TO DIG THAT PORTION OF THE CANAL THAT IS ON MY PROPERTY
TO A DEPTH OF FOUR FEET AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED PLAT.
PERRY F_ORTISCUE

J tuar / fit. MoorP�s' E' `
9 Prn�n9e� �'
Rrver Share Lo>< ki 8eo f 8nsr� r ..,,.,
Neor Rivers/de Pa.� n.d o 'rt xpx x
n . rP
ILI
O
0 8
1�1 we
13
o
ti.�-k'' •.V S ' rt k
tj v1
` d3
c '
A.14
�, 0
S Denn/s Smrl4w/c,4 } V/L �\u°
I �
p
-
4
W /z
98
I rz.s'
7s'
S 3' SS�yv 9
' So, I
i-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/%uIs e I
I
' I
I
1
I
A/ Perry-o.-l/escue I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti

K
c
B111 SWAGE9UO
NORTN CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
TITS DEED, made this _Lday or .tune,
1988, by and between .IAMBS M. FORTESCUE and wife, ELVTRA W.
FORTESCUR, parties of the first part, to MAYWOOD PERRY
FORTESCUE and wife, PENNY FORTESCUE, parties of the second
part:
W I T N E S S E T H:
That for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS (;10.00) in hand paid by the parties of the second
part to the parties of the first part, and for other Rood and
valuable considerations to them moving, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, said parties of the first part have Riven,
granted, bargained, and sold, and by those presents do hereby
give, grant, bargain, sell„ and convey unto the parties of the
second part, their heirs and assigns, in fee simple, that
certain lot or parcel of land lying and being in Long Acre
Township, Beaufort County, North Carolina and more particularly
ill described as follows
BEGINNING in the Northeastern shore
O
line of Pamlico River
at the Northwest corner of Lot No. 6
y
in the Mrs. H. Henry
Hoore Subdivision of Lots as shown an
map thereof entitled
"Mrs. N. Henry Moore's Lots" by C. E.
Jackson, C.E., March
23-27, 1950, said map being of record
ain
the office of the
Register of Deeds of Beaufort County
in Map hook 6, at Page
80, said beginning point being
indicated by an iron
stake and running thence from said
beginning point with
the Northern line of Lot No. 6
Eastwardly 213 feet
to the Northeast corner of Lot No. 6;
thence with the Eastern
line of Lot No. 6 Sonthwardl.y 65
feet to Ernest Mears
Northeast corner; thence with said
Mears Northern line
Westwardly 192 feet to said Mears
Northeestern corner
in the shore line of Pamlico River and
thence with the shore
line of Pamlico River Northwnrdly 50
feet to the point of
beginning, comprising a part of Lot

BOOK BMPIGE90JL
No. 6 as shown on said mop, together with and including, a
perpetual en^gment and right of way of ingress and egress
over nod upon the twelve foot road shown on said map and
its c::tonsion ncross the. sni.d Ilenrs lot to the lot
heroinohove doscribed. The land above described is a part
of: the same Lnud conveyed to Otti.s 11. Warner and wife,
Marguerite O. Warner, by deed of record in said office in
(look 409, Page 505; reference to said map and Deed being
herrhy made for n more complete description, but this
conveyance is made subject to the right of the City of.
4Jnshington to mnintnin its power lines over said premises.
It nl.so being the same ns conveyed to Webster 1-1. Sullivan
and wife, Lnura C. Sullivan, by Deed dated March 31, 1972,
of record in hook 680 nt Page 379, Beaufort County
Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO ID1LD said lands and premises
unto them, the parties of the second port, their heirs and
assigns, ill fee simple, together with all privileges and
appurtenances therounto belonging.
And the parties of the first part covenant
to and with the parties of the second part, their heirs and
assigns, tlint they are seized of said lands in fee and have the
right to convey the same in fee simple; that the same is free
and cl.enr of all encumbrances; and that they do hereby warrant
and will forever defend the title thereto against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHERP.0F, the parties of the
first part have hereunto set their hands and seals this the clay
and year first above writte
(SEAL)
(SEAL)

H. BjtIjy;ET COX AND WIFE,
MARY E. COX
TO
/p� I V% ( RY BECKWITH 1-100[tE
E E 1)
RODMAN & RODMAN
ATTOW4EYS n n COUNSCL.RS AT LAW
I
a

150
w - •COL - �q
F ice, ci.
S9iG)U
!u:•:n:iJ
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
THIS DEED, Made this 21st day of December, 1970, by H. Bridget
Cox and wife, Mary E. Cox, parties of the first part, to Mary Beckwith Moore,
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH:
That the parties
of the first part, in consideration of the a= of $10.00 and other valuable
considerations to them paid by the party of the second part, the receipt
whereof is acknowledged, have given, granted, bargained, sold and do hereby
convey unto the party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, that certain
lot or parcel of land in Long Acre Township, Beaufort County, North Carolina,
described as follows:
Beginning at an iron marker in the center of an old road,
the property line between the parties hereto (said iron marker being designated
on map hereto attached by the letter "B"), and running thence North 61.degrees
East 28 feet to an iron marker; thence North 51 degrees 15 minutes West 78 feet
thence North 15 degrees 45 minutes West 108 feet to a canal; thence along the
Southeastern bank of said canal North 27 degrees 30 minutes East 60 feet to a
marker in the line of the Cedar Circle Subdivision; thence along said line
60 feet
North 1 degree 30 minutes East/to an iron marker, S. D. Smithwick's corner;
thence with the Smithwick line South 53 degrees 45 minutes West 237 feet to
an iron marker in the old road; thence along said road South 55 degrees East
258 feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.57 acres as surveyed by Blake
C. Lewis, December 20, 1970, plat of which survey is hereto attached, including
and conveying herewith an easement or right of way 25 feet in width, the Wester
line of which begins at the iron marker, Point "B" on the map hereto attached
and runs South 9 degrees East 470 feet to the Northern right of way of State
II
11

,11Z 7 '.TO E-' Go
ki
I,/ >/
/-/ 0 o -'s 7-
i-
:J"
, Z. 5!
X 7
'El
1jr
7- -0.
IS 7,9

. . ,,
,au LOLa. here La cxcap,.au ...... ---- ..j i„.; hr.•....._ -_ -
easement for ingress and egress 25 feet in width an ahown on the attached map
and which begins at the letter "B" on said map and rune Northwardly along the
East line of the parcel herein conveyed to the canal ahoun on said map.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the some, together with all and singular,
the rights, ways, privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise
appertaining unto the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, in
fee simple.
The parties of the first part covenant with the party of the
second part that they are seized in fee simple of the land above described and
have good right and title to convey the same; that the same is free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances and that they will forever warrant and defend the
title to the same against all lawful claims and demands.
IN WITNESS MiEREOF, the parties of the first part have hereunto
set their hands and affixed their seals, this the day and year first above
written.
q'J . ` 1 _ .. 1 ^ _. f (SEAL)
It. BRIDGET COX
(SEAL)
NARY E. COX
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
Before me, •' [ .'•'• '-.', n Notary Public
in and for the State and County aforesaid, this day personally appeared
H. Bridget Cox and wife, Mary E. Cox, and acknowledged the due execution by
them of the foregoing, instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this theday of
December, 1970.
lee
NOTARY. PUBLIC
My•cominission expires: .i X' 14
North ('nhrolina
Beaufort County �!c r✓ (% /C/
The foregoing certificate_ of
Notary public/Notarierl'ublie Wore certified to be correct.
'this iuslrumenl. xras prescnlo(1 for m0sti®lion and recorded in this office
This .TL ). (lay of -., IDS- at o'clock '� .M.
lnlol T. Morgnu B
Y. ( t •/ / c %''�` l
Register of herds /�/ / Ilr..puly Register of heeds

.. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ____________________________ COUNTY.
1l
IF •t1 I• ________ ____________________, allotary Public In and for said county sad state, duly appointed,; '..
4t, W
qualified and acting, do he certify that __-__---- ___-.--- and \----------------------
ur✓
5.� his wife, personally appeared before vie this day and acknowledged the due eze<etio¢ of the foregoing InetrIlme¢q _ I
.�.. f n ,
and the mid _________________________________ wife of _________,____________-_______-, being by me pdantelgt- . ; f` ,
..'. a
examined, separate and spurt from her eeld hasbandr touching her voluntary execution of the same, Both state that she x' ; .�. ,,.,
u s* signed the.eame freely and voluntarily, without fear or compulsion of her said husband or nn other person, end that
she doth voluntarily sweet thereto.
Witness my hand mid oincial seal, this the ______________ day of ---- ________-___________, _- + '•, :
o•
h
yy�
w
•��' ���i:
a
-1
,-'�r�l
,(�)
at'�i riid
..
` . _.
Notary Public
r ..-
n.
I
•.S't.
i
-
•, �
�
• i k, � �
r1
i� G
jig
i
IMI
7d
S BEAUFORT-------- COUNTY. OF NORTH CAROLINA, ___________--
____________________ a Notary Public in and for said county and state, duly appointed;
qualified,. and acting do hereby certify t1m _ .__YRt3 All_,CUnH1VXrtqaWonnlly appeared before me this
day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoin runsenk
Witness my hand and official seal, this the ______________
Notary Pubs '
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, mayfL_,___ __ COUNTY..'
YAp----------------------------
-------------------------------
-The9
4�g day f - Alit
.r
e foregoing eertifiente,¢1t t*tlCt14�-y�� -
..1;- ______________________ �Wa'�__ - d to be correct. Let the inetrnment. with
the certificate be reghderede����,s.d•"' ,-n„v.4tPSF• 'yttr�(y.� -! -
IIP1ur" gjtLltdif• ,� •7P` This ____________ day of {1tEy�YSQ___ 9gQlbt^^'-" ----: _ _______Super___-----------------
Clerk of Superior Court.

'.t
Marranty Verb-11cintrb nub for Bale ba 11amtlm Printing Vompaug - lenahingtan. N. Of
North Carolina, _____.___ VAPato_i'-A___-______County
This Deed, made this ------- 1.---------- nay of___________.Jul,Y_________________A.D.193_7_
by ----- 4f• L. Van an unmarried)---------------------
---------- ----------------------------•----------- ----------••--------•--•----------•••--•--•-----
of ---- B04149rt ------ County and State of ______ ____Nontli_Caroline,----------. of the first part.
to ----------------------- ZZ..fi0=7--Mcexe-____________________________________ ti---__________-__-
,_
`Bea h
__ __________County end Slate of __. _Nort
__._ (;&r4Llz>,8_______, of the second Patti
�
Witnesseth,That said ---------- 9P_L._Yangheil,_.party__of_tba_f1r-at part:___------- f
in consideration of
_-Ten_S1Q.p0)----r_----_-=- ----==---Dollars,,
.to _____ m_------- paid bv __ N�-Henry_�foorQ,__Darty_nf__tha_-senond_part,___________
1' •
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hag__ bargained and sold, and by these presents dopes_
grant, bargain, sell and convey to the said______ N,_ Henry_Moore________________________________'.
----s
his heirs and assigns, a certain tracr of land in --------------- Beaufort --------------------- county,
State of North_ QaIvlin__ adjoining the lands of_1dSA:__BYliilla_Slriff3l>_Yatenenn,._:'
�Y&tCxe_e_PSm11Ae_RS_¢air-------------------:-'..;
xmix l m, and bounded as follows, vtz'
i
Situated on the North aide of Pamlico River, about 3} miles
µ below the Town of Washington, about a quarter of a mile below aRiver="'
j. side Parka, being part of the farm tract of the said J. S: and J. W.
- Garde, which formerly belonged to W. C. Rodman, and bounded and de-
scribed as follows, to -Witt
Beginning at a steel shaft driven in the ground at the
�- watebls edge of*Pamlico River, in the Northwest corner of the pro @Pty
.'of Sybilla Griffin Peterson, as conveyed to her In a deed from Je'u.
_y :;.Barrie et als,`dated Dec. 7th, 1925, and registered in Book 260 at
page,249-, Beaufort County Records, to which reference is made, and
�•'`•'.`.'::'j,��^^+ng thence with the line of said tract reversed,. South 50 East
^a•154:2eet.to an iron pipe driven in the ground in said line of said
Peterson `lot; : thence with the East edge of aprivate road which leads.,
to"the Peterson property,.North 521 301 East 270 feet to an angle of
t ";t the':2road;'thence with -'the East edge of the .said road North 731 301 '
_,fir :;y�East 104;-feet-:to a pinetreeto which the line fence of 0arris and
e_attaohed,--standing on the. East edge of, the Bald private z1
i+oad•: thence with the said line fence enfl the edge of the :said toad,
i;•`;:' .".NoriA;461:3oa East 56 feet; -thence with the East edge of the said''ad,
2'.+,;,Nortff;9 West 468 feet to an angle, of the road; thence crossing the said
,..::road, North 52 West 290 feet to ::the point where an old farm gate formerly
I;,;:� �•' stood, 'thence with the-'Sotithweet'ed a of the said road, the edge of the
cl6dried and wood land,'North 3117301 Weat 145"feet to a pine in -the '
an9ld"of an old'wire;feho thence"tSotith 79 °Went :55 feet to •the waterlie
a
r; elbetween a "small "
dg_gtu�on•the'lend,and a cypress in the Water;�thenoe"•
''with'Pamlico River to the 'beginning; 'containing 2.6 acres, more or less,
,•t'�'•1.; iVbdi.ng'the same lands'and easements'which are'set forth in a deed from
.J. W. 0arris and others to''W: L.'=Vaughan,:dated'Apr11 2, 1931, • registered.
Apri1,7, 1931, In Book 289, page 29 of Beaufort County Records, which is
hereby referred to, together with'all'and every water front, river shore
- arid, riparian right and privilege, apptirtenant to and attendant updn the
shore line of the said property as it fronts on Pamlico River, to the
navigable waters thereof. It being the same property surveyed and

�ftte& by John B. Surveyor,*,for If. L. Xaughan, April 29
31.. to T.iffhIch plat and survey reference Is hereby made.
rf
There is also coh;reybd to the said H. Henry Hoore,'his Vv:
`heird'and assigns, In connection with-the*above described property
bipdrpetua easement orx -ight-of-wky. on and: across the lands of ., ry '11-1
1,7j ., S;L'd&rrig at* ale, leading from the 'public Landing Road' I which 1,
eltanda 'from What-ld now balled'Riveraido Park to the above described
tract'and the road which 'runs along the Eastern edge thereof "to
edge- of' -the cleared land.'
'This conveyance is made subject to' the lien of all Out-
s tAnding And unpaid ,taxes, which are hereby assumed by the pur- _" W,
chaser.

To Have and to Hold the aforesaid trail of land, and all the. privilege's and appurtenanceP1
belonging to the said --------------- 41- - Knu - 192net ----------------------- -------------
---------- ------------------ --------------------- M -------
--(Ilr-- only use and behoof forever.
'%0o`_Ah
the said ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Aad W. L. VnPan
!:dnd L ------------------------------- — -------------------- for --- hia--* ;.sel -------- -a ---
heirs, executors and adminibfirators, covenant --a- with said ------- ---------------
--------------- !�A:k --- heirs and assigns, that ------ jhA_Lq------
- ----------------------------------
seized of said premises in fee and haa.---a- right to convey in fee simple-, that the same are fre� a from I
encumbrances, and that ------ li8 ----- doffl_G__ hereby forever warrant and will forever defend th6 said
wp title to the samr, againd the claims of all persons whomsoever.
­.;. 1n testimony whereof, the said_______ At (I'llmarked.) 1�7
�4"W. , ------------------- ---
--- ---- ------- ------ ----------- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 ---------------------
'71�' ha.4t--- hereunto set ------ hIA Aind- and seal---, the day and year fiisl aboviliRiten.
4
I
witn..—
A

cw_ — f37
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT COUNTY
I, Mary Beckwith Moore, being of sound
mind and disposing memory, do hereby make, declare and publish th
my Last Will and Testament, hereby revoking all other wills here-
tofore made by me:
"ITEM ONE
It is my desire that my two sons share
equally in my estate, that each have a one-half value of my esta
Accordingly, I devise and bequeath to my two beloved sons,
Nathaniel Henry Moore and Stuart Beckwith Moore, share and share
alike, all of the real, personal and mixed property including mo
stocks, bonds and other securities which I own at the time of my
death, but I specifically devise to Stuart Beckwith Moore, in fee
simple, to be included in his half of my estate, my home located
in Washington Park, the lot of which fronts on Riverside Drive by
125 feet. I make this specific devise bzcaus^ ey son., Nathaniel
Henry Moore, is well established in his own home on the river. If
Stuart decides that he had rather not accept the specific devise,
and Henry does not want the home place, I suggest that it be sold
and the money divided between them.
Among the personal property of my esta
are complete sets of Colonial Records and State Records. It is m
desire that in the division of my estate, that the set of Colonia
(Records not be broken and the set of State Records not be broken.
I am sure that my two sons can make a
(just and fair division of my estate between themselves, but they
should not hesitate to call upon expert advice as to real estate
(values if they find that they need such advice.
ITEM TWO
In the event that either or both of my
This is Page 1 of two pages of my Last
/�Will
Qand
yTestament. �

said sons should predecease me, I devise and bequeath the interes
in my property which my said deceased son or sons would have re-
ceived had he or they survived me to his children.
'ITEM THREE
I hereby name and appoint my sons,
Nathaniel Henry Moore and Stuart Beckwith Moore, Co -Executors of
this my Last Will and Testament. They may serve without bond or
other security.. -It is my wish that they pay all of the just debt!
of my estate as early as practicable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Mary Beckwith
Moore, have hereunto set my hand and seal,� this March 4, 1971.
uv�ilT/�uZ�� z'L�fSEAL)
Signed, sealed, published and declared by the said Mary
Beckwith Moore, to be her Last Will and Testament in the presence
of us, who at her request and in her presence, and in the 'presence
of each other, do subscribe our names as wilt/.n//eemosses thereto.
,fw, V
This is Page I of two pages of my Last Will and Testament.
a-u• 2p�

+Y--Hen ry Atfoore d� 4e
R. lLloore'S
_8rv__er Share Lol
(year Rwers/de /oar
5.ra1c. 1*w 3a' Doles-is-N
P�Ar#,2
N r�
Morn �fnnnet
EYL•Ovn fi n \
Ne w
Egca VO t'en
MM
E' I-A10
n • d
Y eY X
a
V./e1 le
rP li"C e
pe \
yiyk
S Denn/S SmAw/c-�
��
98' �
.L,vs%Rj Pi cr I
o�
n L Wei Cen
vE
d3
see./,1•� ';}
Nag b
0
: N
- N
.e
u
e'h a a'h i 'A 4
.�iA
— O M
a n'+•I �^` ems•
N
v
j• C'

`a dr
10
ilk
% of a # 1 d7d
u °/1PAOJJj
N
® GO/ion D7/i�
Wo \ T
uoi f oa �y 3p �� a0�,vuaf viory
�o 0 7
i
O N�u7
E� d
y
Jae p a�/ :all
pop taM I � ���� _ f�Bn�n J,E • 0
7 l�l
at
9i
gi
Py 7 1 .,.au.vs�a,s�

�%.:oo/ apes -+anima -.oa^7
7°7 a..oys
0 r a ayy fX USF4__�_ 9-s
�a� `+f►" ,�N"
O/ ;, / a/"S
7MN
s
,oY
,sv
cuoffo�f4asa.d ,, -
f-4an/o J £
?"7 i@ffi
w.ff og
f vvsad
7MN
,C/ ,/;a/ -VS
,v -,a
dv� dia/
, O£
r---
, S
g
—� 09
7MN
Wa{/ 'g/
7M N
e 7hN/V
/ P
71" /V
voaJ /+M
7MN
J21uc//�/V�

i
4
1,9
I
i
j
(� C1
� 11
i
i
e ~
Y' @
C FF

ao --cZelo-I
77'
71 Illy/
�Itl
17'
5�0 41 V
ci en
74
.5"p Lo 0-1
,
1
�e -5'a W
71r 'o 7, 4V IR/ '->7 -a"f %?,K "I/ ' "I' VLt 0' &""W r" I
---dl I '_/ OL14 AtW'