Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-14 Whichard, Warren Application BookLMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. Environmental Consultants February 23, 2010 Mr. Roberto Schiller NC Division of Water Quality 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 Mr. Al Hodge NC Division of Water Quality 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 RE: Bay Lakes CAMA Major Permit application Dear Messrs. Schiller and Hodge, # RECEIVED MAR 9 201Q; Morehead cny DCM The applicant for the above -referenced CAMA permit application has provided me with a copy of the DWQ's 1/28/2010 letter regarding the associated application for a 401 Water Quality Certification. I am also in receipt of the DWQ's letter dated 11/25/2009 that followed our 10/22/2009 meeting at the Washington DENR office. This letter and the enclosed report provide a response to those 11/25/2009 and 1/28/2010 letters, and specifically provides information regarding the request for hydrodynamic modeling. In our 10/22/2009 meeting, we discussed some of the information provided in the enclosed report. We discussed specifics of the ambient water quality sampling, existing connections to adjacent waterbodies, and measures to maintain good water quality. It was my understanding that the DWQ would review the information provided in the meeting, provide a letter with any additional information needed to make a decision regarding use of the data in lieu of hydrodynamic modeling, LMG would resubmit any additional information requested, and the DWQ would make a final review of the information and provide a decision. The 11/25/2009 DWQ letter requests some additional information, for which a response is provided in the enclosed report. However, the letter also appears to make a conclusion regarding the need for hydrodynamic modeling. On behalf of the applicant, I would like to request that DWQ please consider all of the information provided in the enclosed report before making a final decision on the need for hydrodynamic modeling. This letter and enclosed report is intended to follow up on discussions at the 10/22/2009 meeting and the DWQ's following 11/25/2009 letter. I have signed notification forms and/or certified mail receipts from notifications sent to all existing Bay Lakes property owners regarding riparian buffer requirements. I will forward that information in a separate package, along with information requested regarding avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts. Supplement to 401 Water Quality Certification application through the NC CAMA Major Permit application process Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC DWQ Project # 09-0757 Documentation of Existing Connectivity and Satisfaction of NC DENR Water Quality Standards Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC February 4, 2010 Prepared for: NC Division of Water Quality 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC, 27889 Prepared by: Land Management Group, Inc. P. O. Box 2522 Wilmington, NC 28402 On behalf of: Mr. Warren Whichard, applicant I. Purpose. This report is a supplement to the NC CAMA Major Development Permit application submitted for the Bay Lakes property in Chocowinity, NC. As detailed in the CAMA Permit application, the property contains man-made canals and a basin/pond area. The property is bounded to the south by Chocowinity Bay, to the west by Taylor Creek, and to the north by Whichard's Beach Road and Rodman Creek which abuts the northern side of the road (see enclosed aerial). Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek and Rodman Creek at the location of the property are all classified by the NC Environmental Management Commission as SC/NSW. This classification indicates waters are nutrient sensitive, tidal salt waters. Uses for this water classification are defined by 15A NCAC 0213.0101(d)(1) as "saltwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife". The NC Marine Fisheries Commission designates the waters as "Inland Waters". Surface water connections currently exist between the waters of Bay Lakes and Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek and Rodman Creek, but none of the existing connections are navigable. The CAMA Permit application requests to excavate a new canal which would provide small recreational runabouts navigable access from the existing canals to Chocowinity Bay. The purpose of this report is to provide additional information to the NC Division of Water Quality in response to comments received during the CAMA Major Development Permit application review process. Specifically, this report responds to the DWQ's request for a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model. Other items of additional information requested by DWQ are being provided in a separate letter. It is understood that when a new upland marina basin is proposed, predictive computer modeling is one of the few ways to demonstrate DO standards can be expected to be met in the future basin. However, the fact that the Bay Lakes waters already exist with connections allows the opportunity to sample conditions directly and in real time. This report provides documentation that: (1) the Bay Lakes basin/pond and canals are already an open system with connections to the adjacent waterbodies (2) an improved connection is not expected to result in a loss of defined uses and (3) the waters currently meet water quality standards defined in 15A NCAC 02B.0220(3)(b) and should continue to meet that standard and the antidegradation policy defined in 15A NCAC 026.0201. It is intended that this data and documentation provide adequate information with which to assess potential impacts to water quality in lieu of an additional three-dimensional hydrodynamic model. II. Existing Connectivity. The existing basin/pond (labeled "ex. waterway" on figures in the CAMA Permit application) and canals within Bay Lakes are already an "open system' in the current condition based on connections to several directly adjacent waterbodies. As mentioned, the Bay Lakes system is connected to: (1) Chocowinity Bay to the south (2) Taylor Creek to the west and (3) Rodman Creek to the north through culverts under Whichard's Beach Road. A connection to Taylor Creek exists along the western side of the existing basin/pond and is labeled on the CAMA Major figure "Existing Conditions" (also see enclosed aerial). The NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM) previously determined un- permitted work had been done in this location and the restoration plan on record with the DCM documents a connection. Although it is clear the connection is not permitted to be navigable, flow between the creek and the basin was maintained. Under the direction of -1- DCM, two 48" culverts were placed under the normal water level with rip rap over top. The top of the rip rap is approximately 1' to 2' below the normal water level. This clearance was specifically requested by the resource agencies to maintain a connection for the movement of fish between Taylor Creek and the existing basin. This connection also inherently allows for water flow as do the two submerged 48" culverts. It is common to see a tide coming in over this connection and several site photographs of these events are enclosed in this report (see photographs enclosed). A surface water connection also exists to Taylor Creek in the southern corner of the pond/basin (see enclosed aerial). On south and southwest winds, the waters of Taylor Creek flow across this low area and into the Bay Lakes pond/basin. At the northern -most extent of the canal system, where connections are important for flushing, a culvert under Whichard's Beach Road connects the most inland canal to Rodman Creek. Photographs of both the Bay Lakes and Rodman Creek sides of the culvert are provided in this report and small minnows are clearly visible in the photographs (see photographs enclosed). Surface water connections to Chocowinity Bay inherently exist. Aerial photography - shows a fringing wetland on the southern edge of the property along Chocowinity Bay. As defined by their fringing landscape position, these wetlands receive lateral flows from Chocowinity Bay. A portion of the Bay Lakes shoreline along Chocowinity Bay has been -- previously disturbed, and although vegetation is now maintained as mowed grasses rather than the natural woody vegetation, elevations are close enough to the adjacent wetlands that wetland criteria is met. During large wind tides, Chocowinity Bay often floods this low-lying wetland area. In fact, waters often completely flood the low-lying wetland area and flow into the existing pond/basin area. An existing man-made canal now provides direct connection from the bay to the pond/basin area (see CAMA application materials). Photographs of the ponding in this low-lying wetland area resulting from wind tides are enclosed in this report. Further evidence of a hydrologic connection to Chocowinity Bay is provided by tide gauge data. LMG installed a tide gauge in the Bay Lakes basin/pond at the Whichards existing dock (which is on the east side of the pond/basin) and in the existing open water canal in Chocowinity Bay. Data from those gauges was compared to tide data at the Core Creek Bridge, as obtained from Tides and Currents, NOAA, NC Station ID 8656084. Hydrographs from both the Chocowinty Bay and Bay Lakes gauges are nearly identical and provide further evidence of the existing connectivity (Photographs of tide gauge location and hydrographs enclosed). Ill. Ambient Water Quality. To assess whether creating an improved connection between the Bay Lakes waterbodies and Chocowinity Bay can be expected to maintain the DO standard of 5mg/L (15A NCAC 02B.0220(3)(b)) and satisfy the antidegradation policy (15A NCAC 02B.0201(f)), ambient water quality sampling was done. For projects where a new upland basin is proposed, predictive modeling is an effective tool for determining whether such standards can be met. With the Bay Lakes canals and basin/pond already existing, water quality conditions can be sampled directly. Data describing an existing condition should provide a more useful and potentially more accurate description than predictive modeling. -2- LMG sampled ambient water quality parameters using a YSI-85 (Yellow Springs Instrument Co. Model 85) dissolved oxygen, conductivity, salinity, and temperature meter. Sampling was done in the summer of 2007, early fall of 2008, and in the summer and early fall of 2009. This time of year was specifically chosen as it represents the season when biological oxygen demand is expected to be the highest and, as a result, when dissolved (DO) oxygen levels are expected to be the lowest. Both the summers of 2007 and 2009 were relatively hot and dry years (with the summer of 2007 being a drought year). The time period sampled should represent an average worse case condition for ambient DO concentrations. Locations of the 2007 sampling stations were based on early conversations and site meetings with NC DENR staff. Sampling stations were placed at the head of each existing canal where DO values were expected to be lowest. Sampling stations were also located in Chocowinity Bay and Taylor Creeks for reference and comparison to the connecting waterbody. Locations of the 2009 sampling stations were revised slightly following a 6/3/2009 review of the 2007 data at the Washington DENR office with Roberto Schiller. At that time, additional sampling in the summer of 2009 was requested along with removal of the Taylor Creek stations from the 2009 sampling (Stations #1, #2, and #12). Sampling stations in 2009 also included points at the head of each existing canal and within open waters of Chocowinity Bay for reference to the connecting waterbody. (See enclosed Sample Location Maps). Sampling methods follow those outlined by the NC DWQ Ambient Monitoring System's Quality Assurance Project Plan (NC AMS CAPP 2004). Field measurements at each sampling station follow the Profile 2 (PR2) method described in that document, where three points in the water column are sampled to capture any stratification of DO concentrations. Three standard readings were taken: (1) a surface reading where the probe is submerged just below the water surface, (2) a bottom reading where the probe is placed just above the bottom surface but not on the bottom and (3) a mid point in the water column between the top and bottom points. In cases where water depths were approximately 3' or less, the number of points in the water column was collapsed to two or just one if water depths were particularly shallow. This adjustment of the sampling method is warranted in shallower depths where the likelihood of stratification is less and where fewer points in the column can adequately describe ambient concentrations. Sampling done on 6/11/2009 sampled two points in the water column even in depths exceeding 3'. However, none of the sampling depths were greater than 6', and the average of a top and bottom water column reading was thought to be a sufficient description of the water column. In a subsequent 10/22/2009 meeting with DWQ Washington Regional staff, information regarding LMG's meter calibration protocols was requested. LMG staff follows all instructions provided in the YSI 85 manual and generally uses the same protocol for electrometric sampling methods with meters that self -temperature correct as described in the NC DWQ Intensive Survey Unit's Standard Operating Procedures (NC DENR 2003). LMG's written protocol for calibration of the YSI 85 is provided with this report, and the meter was calibrated in situ the morning of each sampling event. The 7/20/2009 sampling found unexpectedly high DO values, and directly after the sampling event, the LMG meter was calibrated against meters at the University of North Carolina Wilmington's Aquatic Ecology Laboratory. The meter was found to be accurate and that data was retained. -3- Sampling occurred on: 6/14/2007, 6/29/2007, 7/20/2007, 8/27/2007, 8/10/2008, 10/1412008, 6/11/2009, 7/31/2009, 8/17/2009, 9/09/2009, and 10/29/2009. Raw data from these sampling events was included in full as an appendix to the CAMA Major Permit application. The DWQ's letter dated 11/25/2009, which followed our 10/22/2009 meeting, contained four specific questions regarding the data. Item #1 of that letter related to the recorded depth at Station 4 on 8/27/2007. Field notes from that date were reviewed and the depth has been corrected. Item #2 of that letter related to the omission of Stations 1, 2, and 12 from the 8/10/2008 data. That sampling date has been removed completely, and data from a more comprehensive 10/14/2008 sampling have been included. Sampling on 10/14/2008 was done while on -site for a Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) and shellfish surrey. Item #3 of that letter related to the omission of Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, and 14 from the 7/31/2009 data. Sampling on 7/31/2009 was done in conjunction with a meeting at the DWQ's Washington Regional field office about the project. Sampling on that date was done in areas accessible from the bulkhead at the upper end of each canal. Although the Chocowinity Bay stations (Stations 3, 4, and 5) and some of the interior Bay Lakes stations (13 and 14) were not sampled, the points sampled were located at the most landward extent of the canals. This data was descriptive of conditions at the most landward locations and was included towards that purpose. Item # 4 of that letter related to the omission of Stations 1, 2, 12, and 8 from the 8/17/2009 data. Stations 1 and 2 had been removed from the regular 2009 sampling protocol per DWQ request, and Station 8 was omitted based on the fact that Station 7 represented similar conditions in the pond/basin and that Stations 9-11 represented similar conditions at the head of canals. As requested in DWQ's 11/25/2009 letter (Item #4) data from the USGS station #0208450705 Pamlico River Channel Light #16 was sought for correlation to the data collected on -site. Metadata provided on the USGS's website (waterdata.usgs.gov) indicate available data from that station ranges from 1989 to 1993, and a comparison could not be made. Data collected on -site show that for every sampling event where Bay Lakes and Chocowinity Bay were sampled, DO concentrations in the existing Bay Lakes pond/basin and canals were as good or better than DO concentrations in Chocowinity Bay (see enclosed data). More specifically, every sampling date showed the Bay Lakes waters to have a higher average DO than Chocowinity Bay, except the 6/14/2007 and 6/11/2009 sampling dates. On those two dates, average DO concentrations in Bay Lakes and Chocowinity Bay were essentially the same with less than 0.5mg/I difference between the averages (see.enclosed graph). Excluding the 7/31/2009 sampling which did not include all sampling stations, average ambient DO concentrations in the Bay Lakes waters was found to be 7.1 mg/L which is well above the 5mg/L standard. These data show the DO standard is currently met in the Bay Lakes pond/basin and canals. In fact, average DO concentrations are not significantly lower, but are often higher than average concentrations in Chocowinity Bay. Explanations for good water quality parameters may be related to several factors. Existing connections with Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek, and Rodman Creek prevent the system from being a closed system. Wind data from Warren Field in Washington, NC, has been included in this report to document prevailing wind directions. During the summer when DO is expected to be lowest, predominant winds are from the south, southeast, and southwest. These wind directions should promote mixing of the waterbodies and in particular exchange between the Bay Lakes system and Chocowinity Bay. Secondly, it is expected that groundwater discharge from the wetland system to the west of the property provides freshwater input which improves water quality. Thirdly, Chocowinity 11 Bay had a measured salinity ranging from 1.5 parts per thousand (ppt) to 9.5 ppt. The fact that this waterbody appears to be in the oligohaline to mesohaline range rather than a more brackish range allows for naturally higher DO concentrations. _ It is also noted that the applicant proposed in the CAMA permit application several measures to maintain good water quality. These measures include: (1) filling of several small canals or ditches where the new canal would disconnect the existing canals to prevent stagnant pockets of water (2) the creation of two additional connections between the existing pond/basin and existing canals to enhance exchange (3) wetland _ enhancement along the previously disturbed wetland area and (4) compliance with Tar Pamlico Riparian buffer regulations which is not currently applied to the property since DWQ does not recognize it as an open system. The applicant is also willing to remove the earthen berm and dirt road which exists on the western side of the pond/basin area. Removing this berm would increase flow and exchange with Taylor Creek. The Bay Lakes waters are already connected to the adjacent waterbodies and currently met the defined DO standard. The proposed navigation canal should improve the connection to Chocowinity Bay, and there is no evidence from the on -site data that the improved connection would degrade DO in Chocowinity Bay below natural concentrations. IV. Dissolved Oxygen Model. While the intended use of the ambient data was primarily to describe the existing conditions, LMG also used the data to run the predictive DO model created by NC DWQ and documented in NC DENR Report # 90-01. It is understood that this model is based on an expected semi -diurnal tidal cycle, and for this reason, DWQ does not approve its use in systems without semi -diurnal tides. As previously described in Existing Connectivity, a tide gauge was placed in the Bay Lakes basin/pond and in the existing open water canal in Chocowinity Bay. Data from those gauges was compared to tide data at the Core Creek Bridge, as obtained from Tides and Currents, NOAA, NC Station ID 8656084. It is known that Chocowinity Bay is highly influenced by wind tides, and tide gauges were installed to define an average =-, wind tide amplitude and to correlate water levels between the Bay Lakes waters and Chocowinity Bay. Somewhat unexpectedly, the hydrographs show a consistent semi - diurnal component. Data is graphed on a daily basis, and when compared to the tidal data from the Core Creek Bridge, a twice -daily change in water levels roughly mimicing the Core Creek data occurs at both the Chocowinity Bay gauge and at the Bay Lakes gauge (see hydrographs enclosed). The Chocowinity Bay and Bay Lakes hydrographs show that wind tides and other factors slightly modify the amplitude of any semi -diurnal effect, but a base amount of semi -diurnal tide appears to be consistent. When the average change in water level was measured off the hydrographs, an average 1' daily change was found. Since a regular, twice daily flux appears to be a component of the water levels based on the on -site tide gauges, it was felt that the DWQ's DO model could be useful supporting information to the collected data. The DWQ model was run to predict the effect on ambient DO in the pond/basin area after the proposed navigation canal was excavated. Model results are presented in a matrix for a range of both sediment oxygen demand (SOD) values and ambient DO concentrations (see enclosed matrix). The model predicts that the DO standard of 5.Omg)L will continue to be met across a wide range of -5- SOD and ambient DO after improved connection to Chocowinity Bay is made. The NC DWQ Environmental Sciences branch has sampled actual SOD in several NC coastal waters. Previous communication with that office indicated that a SOD value of 2.5gO2/m2/day would be a good average SOD for most coastal areas. The graph of ambient DO in the existing basin and canals shows that DO during times of year when values are expected to be lowest averaged more than 5.Omg/L the majority of the time. The results matrix shows that for an SOD of 2.5gO2/0/day, and for any DO value greater than 5.0 mg/L, the standard should be met. The DWQ model results predict the Bay Lakes waters would continue to meet the DO standard which supports the data and conclusions of the ambient data. V. Fish Population Study. During trips to sample ambient water quality, LMG staff consistently noticed fish in the waters of the Bay Lakes basin/pond and canals. Field notes from the 8/17/2009 water quality sampling noted gar actively feeding on silversides and minnows in the pond/basin near the connection to Taylor Creek. It was also very common during sampling events to see mullet. Conversations with the applicants and other Bay Lakes property owners indicated the Bay Lakes waters provide good recreational fishing, and species such as gar, mullet, ell, striped bass, pin fish, croaker, spot, bluegill, and catfish are caught in the waters. The presence and apparent abundance of fish species suggests several things: (1) the use of "aquatic life including propagation and survival' is existing now in the Bay Lakes waters (2) the presence of species commonly found in adjacent waterbodies further documents the existing surface water connections and (3) the abundance and variety of species found in the waters infers water quality is sufficient to support fish life. To describe the biological integrity of the Bay Lakes waters, LMG conducted a fish population study of the waters in October 2009 to characterize fish populations currently utilizing the pond/basin and canals. LMG biologist conducted the fish population study on 29 and 30 October 2009 during daylight hours. Sampling was coordinated to span the entire tidal cycle for the two days. A variety of sampling gear types were employed to indentify as many fish species that may be present at that time of year and season. Gear types included rod and reel, trot lines, nylon cast nets, and 12 ft. otter trawl with one quarter inch stretch mesh. Visual observations were made of fish species too small to be captured with traditional sampling gear. Impromptu interviews of property owners and fishermen were also conducted in order to obtain anecdotal evidence of fish species present at other times of the year. Water quality parameters were collected throughout the waters using a YSI 85 water quality meter (provided in ambient data). Water temperatures ranged from 19.0 to 19.5 degrees Celsius, and salinity in the lake and canals ranged from 9.1 to 10.0 ppt. Weather conditions both days were windy and cool with a Northeast wind at approximately 15-18 knots and air temperatures were in the mid to upper 60s (F). Rod and reel fishing was concentrated around the existing connections to Taylor Creek as well as around shoreline vegetation and structures. Two southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma), 1 red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), 1 longnose gar (Lepisosteus osseus) and 1 blue gill (Lepomis machrochirus) were collected, measured and released alive. One large mouth bass was observed but not captured during rod and reel fishing. Approximately 1,000 Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) were collected in the nylon cast net. Menhaden were observed in large numbers throughout M the lake and canal system during the incoming tidal period. Many small prey species were visually observed along the banks and included mosquito fish (Gambusia spp), striped mullet (Mugil cephalus), and bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilii). Bay anchovy were also collected in the otter trawl which was towed for two one -minute trawls in the main portion of the lake. No other fish species were collected with the otter trawl. No fish were collected by the trot lines which were baited with catfish bait and allowed to fish overnight for approximately 12 hours. Many Atlantic blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) were encounterd during rod and reel fishing and likely removed all the catfish bait from the trot lines before any catfish could locate the baited gear. It has been observed that many of these species travel up Taylor Creek and enter the Bay Lakes and canals through the existing, tidally influenced connection. The fish study shows that the Bay Lakes pond/basin and canals currently harbor many species similar to those found in Chocowinity Bay. There is no evidence to suggest that the existing defined use would be lost with an improved navigable connection. In fact, the addition of an access channel to the Bay Lakes system would likely have a beneficial impact on species by providing two entrance and exit points for fish to migrate in and out of the pond and canals. Also, more flushing of the pond and canals could benefit those species that already utilize the Bay Lakes system. Adding a more navigable entrance to the pond and canals will create additional public trust bottom to be utilized by the recreational fishing community which would also support the defined uses. VI. Summary. The Bay Lakes property is a relatively unique situation in that the basin and canals already exist. We feel it is reasonable to conclude the Bay Lakes system will continue to meet the DO standard and antidegradation policy without additional modeling based on: (1) the basin and canals already exist and ambient DO values currently meet or exceed the state standard (2) the basin and canals can currently be considered an "open system" with connections to Taylor Creek, Rodman Creek, and Chocowinity Bay (3) the DENR DO model predicts the DO standard will be met after construction of the proposed canal and (4) a relatively high biological diversity and the defined aquatic uses appear to be present in the waters now. Ambient DO values are above the standard and the exchange of water from flushing should not have a detrimental impact on the adjacent waters. The applicant is also proposing several mitigative measures to improve flushing. The CAMA application details a request to close and fill any potential "dead pockets" at the upper ends of existing canals that will be cut-off by the new canal. The application also shows the creation of two connections to improve flow between the pond/basin and the proposed canal. A canal currently connects the pond/basin and Chocowinty Bay and was proposed to be filled in the CAMA application. That request is being revised and the canal would remain open to further promote exchange and flushing. The purpose of the requested navigable canal would allow access to Chocowinity Bay by small recreational runabouts. The final depth proposed is only 4 NLW, and this depth will restrict most large boats. There is one existing lot owner who has a larger boat stored in one of the existing canal, but the applicant feels this is atypical. The applicants, who live on the property and know the neighboring property owners, expect that existing homeowners will primarily use small boats without heads. The applicant has indicated that the adjacent subdivisions of Portside and Bayside represent a similar anticipated use. The 7- Portside subdivision has roughly the same number of canal lots as Bay Lakes, and the majority of boats in that subdivision are small runabouts and pontoon boats. Allowing a navigable connection will make the waters public trust waters subject to all applicable state laws. An acknowledged and authorized connection will also provide the opportunity to enforce riparian buffer standards and further protect the waters. Every owner of property in the subdivision has been notified that Neuse riparian buffer requirements would become effective. Signed forms and/or certified mail receipts were returned from those notifications, and LMG is not aware of any owner who has concern over new restrictions in the riparian buffer. The applicant is also willing to place deed restrictions on lots on the central peninsula that have not yet been platted. We request that the DWQ please review this report and supporting documentation as a response to our 10/22/2009 meeting and DWQ's following 11/25/2009 letter and in lieu of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model. r ' Ex. Connection to Rodman Creek - >• • j . _ Y , ° - !G (culvert under Whichards Beach Road) .e. N. Ex. Connection to Taylor Creek s (buried culverts, rip rap over top, approximately I'to 2' below NWL) Ex. Connection to Taylor Creek rr- (surface water flows over low area) •:�F1 - , �'-, Connection to Chocowinity Bay (surface water Flow, tidal exchange ,= existing canal connects Bay and 3 �• pondlbasin area) �- i LMG LAND MANAGEdAEPT GROUP wc. `— FOVIrOnTPM41 Con3Offonri N W+E S SCALE 1" = 700' Mr. Warren Whichard 1998 Aerial Photograph Bay Lakes, Chocowinity Bay (showing existing connections) fting . 5 '' connection to Taylor CreekT 1 �F T 1 9 � ` x R - -- Existing Berm w/ dirt road (could be removed to improve connection) Taylor Creek to left, Bay Lakes to right 4; Aft ,0 Alt +M+� 04 x �r - dp act_ f az' i 1V, +1I wo > 1 - t 1.-4: �•�� t� .1� �I •ru-.iC J� A BOunda11C5 dlF dYP1UR1T11dle d1IU d1V not meant to be absolute. Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography Mr. Warren Whichard I Bay Lakes, Chocowinity Bay CAMA Major Permit application SITE ZLMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUT' me Environmenrnl Consulmnb October 2009 N W+E S SCALE 1" = 700' Tide Gauge Locations Figure 1 Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 -6 -12 -18 -24 -30 01 O� O� 01 O) 01 01 O� 01 01 53 01 01 O� Q1 O� O� 01 OY \ 'z )Jr )JC )Jc )JC )JC '`' '�� .�tj .�6' .�'�• .�0 ��' �O �'`' �`l; �"� rL�'• 2h ry�d �1' 2� 29 ,�O .�0' v0 Tides • Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1) +Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) tide data from core creek Land Management Group, Inc. e brld www.lmgroup.net g ► Bay Lakes ► Chocowinity, NC ► Well 1 - A286960 ► Well 2 - EBD9FCE ► June 15 - June 30, 2007 ► Reading every 1/2 hour Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2 36 30 N 24 d L v 18 C 12 N J 6 L d 0 3 c -6 0 /L -12 V -18 -24 -30 O� O� O� 01 01 01 01 01 6 01 6 6 6 w Tides Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1) +Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) ► Bay Lakes ► Chocowinity, NC ► tide data from core creek Well 1 - A286960Well 2 - EBD9FCE Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net bridge ► July 1 - July 15, 2007 ► Reading every 1/2 hour Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2 36 30 N 24 N L V 18 C 12 CD J 6 L Qi R 0 C -6 0 i -12 0 -18 -24 -30 O, 01 01 01 01 O� O� 01 01 01 01 O� O� m Tides --Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1) +Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) ► Bay Lakes ► Chocowinity, NC tide data from core creek ' Well 1 - A286960 Land Management Group, Inc. ► Well 2 - EBD9FCE www.lmgroup.net bridge ► July 16 - July 31, 2007 ► Reading every 1/2 hour Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2 y 24 N L V is C 12 CD J 6 i O 0 C C -6 3 O � -12 CS -18 -24 -30 OA OA 01 01 01 01 01 1;:;P V ,VPJJ' 1P CYP oP P �P �P V �P Tides • Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1) +Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) . Bay Lakes ► Chocowinity, NC ► tide data from core creek Well 1 - A286960Well 2 - EBD9FCE Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net bridge ► Aug 1 - Aug 15, 2007 ► Reading every 1/2 hour 36 30 W 24 0f L C 18 Z 12 J 6 CD 0 C M -6 7 0 2 -16 -24 -30 Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2 �! �I�Illlllllt���L�r T. s wirst! &N=AW,A& 01 O� P5 01 01 O� 01 O� 01 01 01 O� JA 6P �P '� �P '� cy �L �P P `L 2P �P �L 2 � r �L 6P �L1P 2 �L Tides +Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1) I-Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) . Bay Lakes ► Chocowinity, NC tide data from core creek ' Well 1 - A286960 Land Management Group, Inc. ► Well 2 - EBD9FCE www.imgroup.net bridge ► Aug 16 - Aug 27, 2007 ► Reading every 1/2 hour y . r e , .ram I�� �j .' -i' s \.. j •'- * � � �1+ < .� "y . •A:. -. le 74 iK Jrr Fx ♦ �' le fi k 0 350 700 1400 *Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" = 700' Land Management Group, Inc. CAMA Major Permit Application Environmental Consultants AMBIENT WATER QUALITY Bay Lakes P.O. Box 2522 MONITORING STATIONS Applicant: Mr. Warren Whichard Wilmington, NC 28402 SUnllller 2007 T 910-452-0001 Location: C:hocowinity Bay, Beaufort County LMG # 01-07-208 Appendix 2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 6114/2007 Smf:nn WO-1 Tma Bottom Depth-1.5tt Depth Sampled N 1 Temp Cj DO m IL islp.c.q (S Salinity t 0.5 24.7 7.6 3009 1.6 hoots. sampled In'nooemy Day aI Om weo ant WQ-2 Tme Bottom Depth- 2.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tem °C DO m /L S .Con Sl Salinity t 0.5 24.T ].] 3260 1.T Notes: sampled In GimpoNy Bay On well and open watef - Time Time Bottom Depth- 3.5ft Depth Sampled N Tem °C DO m IL S .Lon S Salinity t 0.5 248 ].6 3212 1.] 3.0 24.6 ].fi 32151 1.7 Notes: Chocovdniy Bay (open watel) W04 Time Bottom Depth, 2.Oft Depth Sampled R iTemp °C DO m M1 S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 24.8 7.6 3196 1.7 Notes: Chocowinity Bay (creek towards breech) WO-5 Time Bottom Depth. 2.Ofl Depth Sampled ft Tem 'C DO reIl. S .Con S Salinity t D.5 24.3 7.3 3,072 1.6 Notes: Gnomvnmry nay (meek tawam5 ome.) WQ-6 Time Bottom Depth-2.Oft Depth Sampled R Tem CCI DO m L SP.Con 5 Salinity t 0.5 24.3 2 2 3069 IS Notes: Gnocownly bay (creel, towards pMecb). Oner/oeaver In water WQ-12 Time Bottom Depth. 1.5f1 Depth Sampled ft) Temp °C DO m l- S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 25.4 6.9 2942 1.5 Notes: sampled at breech, Chocowinity Bay side WQ-7 Tme BoHdm Depth-2.5ft Depth Sampled ft Temp C DO m M1 SP.Con S Salinity t 0.5 24.9 7.1 2,9051 1.5 Notes: sampled at existing UOU, wall Site RL (bay Lases) WQ-9 Tme Bottom DeptM1-2.Of1 Depth Sampled fl Tam C DO m IL Sp.Con S Salinity t 6.0 2589 1.3 ..as (°anal L (Day Laxesl WQ-10 Tme Bottom Depth- 2.Oft Depth Sampled ft) Tam 'C DO m 2 Sp.Con S Salinity t a5 25.fi 6.0 2486 1.2 (Day Laxesl WQ-11 Tme Bottom Depth. 1.5ft Depth Sampled fl Tem °C DO m n- Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 25.7 9.7 2396 1.2 Notes: Canal4 (bay Lases) Chocowinity Bay -Surface Water Quality Statistics SP.Con Salinity Te_mpl°Cl DO finnoti 103 19211 Chocowlnity any -Mean 24.7 7.4 3121.9 1.6 Chocowinity Bay - Min 24.3 6.9 294LO 1.5 Chocowinity Bay -Maz 26A 7.7 3260.0 1.7 Bay Ulles- Surface Water Quality Statistics SP.Con Silin' Tem* Vcn DO m R (µSI 1pa l Bay Lakes -Mean 25.5 7.2 2,694 1.3 Bay Lakes - Min 24.9 6.0 2,396 1.2 Bay Lakes -Max 25.7 9.7 2,905 1.5 ctnrinn 2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 6/29/2007 Stntinn WQ-1 Bottom Depth- I.Oft Depth Sampled R Tem °C DO m S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 29.2 7.1 3708 1.6 Notes: samplea In cnocwmny, bay at ola well site WQ-2 Bottom De th-1.0ft Depth Sam lad ft Tem °C DO m 2 S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 29.3 7.0 3.001 7.6 Notes: upstream OI Well, towards DreeOn WQ-3 Bottom Depth- 2.0ft Depth Sam led R Tem 'C DO(m 2 Sp.Con S Salinity (Pli 0.5 29.3 7.11 3,2261 1.6 Notes: Chocowmity Bay (open water) WQ4 Bottom Depth-1.Sft Depth Sampled R Temp °C DO m L S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 29.1 7.4 3,211 1.7 Notes: Gnoccwlnny tlay (moWl Or creek lo'Dealt ramp ) WO.5 Bottom De th-0.8ft Depth Sam led JM Tem j 00 (mgj S .Can S Salinity 1 0.5 29.8 6.9 3790 1.7 Notes: Ghocowinity Bay (la distance up creek to "boat ramp') WQ_6 Bottom De th-O.Bft Do Sam . y ( 05m28 9 ].D 37Salinit 1 1.6 ry ... ae,uymu ai u.auenry - well e l site WQ-7 Bottom Depth- 2.0ft Depth Sampled it Temp °C DO m /L Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 30.7 6.5 3,105 1.6 notes: sample.. well FL.Doty Lakes) WQ-8 Bottom De ih-O.Bft Depth Sampled ft Temp °C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t D.5 31.D 7.4 3078 1.6 Notes: Canal l (bay Lakes) WO-9 Bottom Depth. 1.5ft Depth Sampled fl Tem 'C DO m L Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 30.4 7.61 2,913 1.5 Notes: Canal 2 (Bay Lakes) WQ-10 Bottom Depth- 1.5ft Depth Sampled it Temp °C DO m 2 Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.61 30,61 7.21 2,796 1.3 Notes; Banal 3 (Bay Lakes), noted a Oecease0 Dlue crab WQ-11 Bottom De th-1.5ft Depth Sampled ft Temp°C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.51 30.9 8.2 2 785 1.4 Notes: .,anal a ttlay Lakes) Chocowiniry, Bay -surface water Dustily Statistics S C.. Salfinity Tam °C DO (ni (US) (p tt Chocawiniry Bay - Mean 29.4 7.1 3,161 1.6 Chocowinity Bay -Min 29.1 6.9 3,001 1.6 Chocowiniry, Bay -Max 29.8 7A 3,228 1.7 Bay Lakes - Surface Water Quality Stadstics Sd.Con Salinity Tem °C DO (mn/Ll ILISI fppJ Bay Lakes - Mean 30.7 7.4 2,936 1.5 Bay Lakes - Min 30.4 6.6 2.785 1.3 Bay Lakes - Max 31.0 8.2 3.105 1.6 2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, ChocoWinity, NC 7/2012007 WO-1 Bottom Dept], 3.511 Der Sam letl R Tem °C DO m /L S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 30.9 ].9 3T14 2.0 3.0 29.8 4.5 4780 2.5 notes. samara. m'n-.' Day m mu wan sne WQ-2 Bottom Deladr.2.5ft Depm Sam led h Tem °C DO m IL S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 31.2 ].2 3231 1.7 2.0 31.1 6.81 3,272 1.7 oresm WO-3 Bottom De t11-3.5M1 Depth Sam Cd fl Tem -C DO m S .Con 5 Salinity 1 0.5 30.1 8.2 4 003 2.1 1 3.0 29.4 2.8 534D 2.5 Notes: Gmxxk nay nay ,an ware, WQi Bottom De th-35M1 DBpih Sam led R Tamp°C DO m $ .Con S Salinity t 0.5 29.8 8.4 4 061 2.1 1 3.0 29.5 3.61 5470 2.8 Notes: cnocomnity Day (ma.m 01 trees To -coal ramp ) WQ-5 Bottom Dean- I.Sft Depm Sam letl fl Tem 'C DO re IL S .Can S SalihOy t 0.5 29.7 nmas. wDwmmry eay p,<usynce up oaee to wm,anpl WO-9 Bottom De Ot D.BR DepN Sam letl R Tam °C DO m L S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 31.2 7.0 2 ]B3 1.4 nines. sample. a1 ..a, ramp -wen... sin WO-T Bottom Death- 1.011 Depth Sampled k Tom °C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.51 33 12.3 3219 1.1 N0189: tamales al Wall RL (Bay Lakes) FQ:DepU,1.0ft Depth Sampled ft Tem °C DO m Socon S Salinity [0.6 335 10.e 3218 1.7 tDdy Lai...j E:-Deptn-0.8M1 Depth Sampletl Tem °Cis Sp.Con Salinity Notes: Canal (Bay Lakes) FQ:1-0De 2.Ofl Depth Sampled fl Tem °C DO m IL Sp.Con S Salinity t0.s 33 12.8 2 926 NOW4. -1di a IDey cawal WQ-11 Battsm Depth- 2.Oft OepN Sampletl R Tem °C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 33.1 12.8 2,064j 1.6 Notes: Canal (Bay Lakes) Chocowlnity Bay- Surface Water Quality Statistics S.CCon Salinity Tempt, DO anR. lµSI Ipptj Chocowinity Bay - Mean 30.5 7.7 3,5a3 10 Chocowinity Bay - Min 29.7 7.0 2,70 1.4 Choeowlnfty Bay -Miss 31.2 8.4 4,041 2.5 Bay Lakes - Surface Water Quality Statistics $o Con Salinity Tem °C QO(moll-1 iLl Ip2I Bay Lakes - Mean 33.1 12.0 2,881 1.6 Bay Lakes - Min 32.7 10.6 2,084 1.4 Bay Lakes-M. 33.5 12.8 3,219 1.7 2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 8127/2007 WQ-1 Bottom De th-3.5f1 Depth Sampletl 11 Tem °C DO m /L S .Can S Seliniry t 0.5 3.0 29.4 4.61 7430 4.2 notes, s mplaD m wD,, nny Dey WQ-2 Bosom Depth. 3.5ft Depth Sampled It Tone °C DO- m h S .Con J,Si Salinity d 05 3.0 29,4 51 B030 4.6 npms: upsueam at weµ towama Dream WQJ Boham Death-3.5tt Depth Sampled 11 IT Me °C DO m /L S .Con fusi(Poll Salinity 0.5 29si 5.5 8.2201 4.5 3.0 29.5 d.9 8380 4.5 notes. cnoocaanlw no, Wpen wads) W" Bosom Depth- 3.5 ft Depth Sampled ft ITMOD CJDO m L 5 .Con S Salinity t D.5 29fi 5.5 62]0 4.4 1 3.01 29st 4.9 6390 4.5 NOtee: Gnoccwtnity tlay (mOUm OI onaK t0 "peat Rmp ) WQ-5 Banam Depth. 1.0tt Depth Sampled It LOP CJ DO an S .Con S Seliniry t 0.5 29.1 5.5 8120 4.I Notes: enpcovnmty Day (112 olstance Up cmea TO -Door ramp ) WOE Bottom Depth- 1.0ft ep SDm th Split t 0.5 28.1 5.61 7,9001 4.4 Notes: sampled at 'beat ramp° -well 81 site W0.7 Bosom Da th. 1.0f1 Depth Sampled II Tem, 1.1 DO fenTil Sp.Cdn S Salinity t 0.5 29.4 5.1 ] 160 3.9 News: sampled at well 6l tuay LHMes) E-1 ...It Depth Sampled N Tem°C DO m L Sp.Con S Salinity t 29.8 6.5 ] 140Death. 3.9 toay Lanns/ WBoOtt-o9m De DI-1.Sit opthSp.SeSalinity Samp Team L DO m IL Con S) t R ]2 .6 notes. Ianal4 (Day Laaaa) WQ-10 Boom Da th-1.51t Depth Sampled % Tem °C DO m )L) Sp.Con I (PSI Salinity I f229 5.3 50 3.4 Notes: Canal J ttlay Lall WQ-11 Be... Depth. I SIt Depth Sampled N Tem °C DO m Sp.Cdn S Salinity t 0.5 2S8 7.0 6040 3.3 Notes: Canal (bay Lakes) Chocpwinity Bay - Surface Water Quality SbatlsOcs S�Can Sallnft em C Winds-] l0i 1i •Ohomwiraft Bay -Mean 29.3 6.8 7.940 4.4 Chocowinity Bey - Min 28.1 5.2 7.510 4.2 Choeowlnity Bay -Mee 29.7 7.2 3.270 4.5 Bay tskes- Surface Water DOWN Stallefica ,SS.Lon Salinl Team f°C1 DO fmcl ty�5 1ppg Bay Lakes - Mean - 29.5 6.7 6,668 3.6 Bay Lakes - Min 29.3 5.1 6,040 3.3 Bay Lakes -Mai 29.8 7.7 7,160 3.9 I ".e � ✓r _ r f3 Q-11 44 �AL.` r r■r� 0 350 700 1400 'Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" = 700' Land Management Group, Inc. CAMA Major Permit Application Environmental Consultants AMBIENT WATER QUALITY Bay Lakes P.O. Box 2522 MONITORING STATIONS Applicant: Mr. Warren Whichard Wilmington, NC 28402 910-452-0001 Summer 2009 Location: Chocowinity Bay, Beaufort County LMG # 01-07-208 Appendix 2008 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 10/14/2008 Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 10/1412008 done in conjunction with SAV and Shellfish Survey done on the same day. Rtfi n WO-1 Time Bottom Depth Depth Sampled H Tem °C DO mt Sp.Con Salinity t now. rva.a mv,ea WO-2 Time Bottom Depth Depth Sam letl fl Tem °C DO m S .Con Saliniy D.: nimeampwe WQ41 Time BoHam Depth-3Dfl Depth Sam led fl Tem °C DO m /L S .Can(poll Salinity 0.5 23.8 0.39 1, 9A 2.5 2Ul TMI 16"1 9A - mry", oymi wam, W04 Time Bono. Dep1A O.OR Depth Sam led fl Tem °C DO myt S .Con S Salinity t 0.5 23.] 8.36 1620 9.5 2.5 21.6 8.62 16D0 9.5 chow my Say -open water WO-5 Time Bottom Dept. 2.0fl Depth Sam led fl Tem °C DO m S .Con S Salinity 1.5 23.3 0.6 1610 96 man -mace cnannei in woianen ry eay, one pmm in waver wmmn Due w uepm WQ-6 Time Bottom Depth-2.Dfl Depth Sampled fl Temp °C DO m S .Con S Salinity 1.5 M. 5.6] 1 ST/ 9.2 ,n,yoey. vee Vvun iv wa,vi wiuviii uuv,u uvVui WO-12 Time Bottom Dept Depth Sam led ft Tam °C DOmS Con Salinity ty t rvp[e. a- mwea WO-) Time Bono m Depth-5.5ft Depth Sampled fl Temp°C DO m L Sp.Con S Salinity 1 0.5 23.6 7.9 1638 96 5.0 21.9 ].6 16]0 9.6 tuna area, nay taxee WD-8 Time Bottom Depth Depth Sampled R Tem °C DO m IL Sp.Ccn salinity t Note: Notaamplea Time Bottom Depllt-4.Oft Depth Sampled ft Tem °O DO m IL Sp.Can S SalinityW0.9 t I. 0.5 23.4 9.86 1639 1 3.51 21.7 7.0 1627 9.8 near mean e, man i. eey Lanes WTiBomQtl-eo1m0 Oepth Depth Sampled H Tem °C DO mL Sp.Con Sainy t 0.5 23.3 1615 9.5 65 21.3 5.9 1616-5fl 9.5 carat, eay Laxaa Time Banam Depth-S.On Depth Sampled H Tem °C DO m IL Sp.Con S SalinityWO-11 t 0.5 34.] 10.3 1633 9.fi 45 21.5 5.9 1616 9.5 1 ,.enei,..'unen Chocoadnity Bay - Surface Water Quality statsties SO.Con SaliniW Tam °c Wfm99.1 list Iepfl Chocoadnity Bay -Mean 22.6 7.9 1604.5 9A Chacowlniy Bay- Min 21A 52 1M.0 92 Chocowlnly Bay -Max 0.8 8.6 1820.0 91 Bay takes -S odure Water Quality Sta9eBca 3o Con SaliniW Tem,r Dulsly Iasi I9e0 Bay takes - Mean 227 7.9 1631.8 9.6 Be, Lakes - Min 21A 5.9 1615.0 9.5 Bay Lakes -Max U.T 10.3 1670.0 9.7 2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 611112009 Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 6111/2009 done in conjunction with a SAV Survey done on the same day. Station - WD-i nme Bottom Depth Depth Sampled ft Tem C DO m h S .Con s Salinity NOta. nmiampma WO-2 mme Botlam Depth DeP1h samvlea X Tem °c DO m IL 3 .con(,Sli salinity 1yae. nm samples Time Time Bottom Depth-4.dfl Depth Sampled fl Tem C DO m h 5 .Con S salinity ( t 0.5 28.6 5.90 5.380 2.6 2 28.6 5. 5420 2.] J 5 29.8 6.2525 5410 2.7 wacownny eay-open water WDJ more BOHDm Depth-3.Ofl Depth Sampled fl Temp 'L DO m IL S .Con s1 6ellnlly t 11.8 29.9 6.44 5560 2:] 2.5 29.8 609 5560 2] Lh0000mily Bay open wmer WQ-a Time Bottom Depth-3.Oft Depth Sampled H Tem °C DO m 2 S .Con S sallnlry 1 0.5 2a5 506 5500 2.] 2.5 20.0 4.22 5400 2.7 WQ8 Time0.5 Bottom Depth-3.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tem L 0. DO m S .Con Sin Salinity 29.8 5.2 5.2401 2.5 25 28A 2.5 5000 ==2.T Man-made channel In North wind, party cloudy, 85-87 F WO-] Tlme Bosom Depth -aft Depn Sampled M Tem C Do m h Sp.Lon S S(op)y t) 0.5 30.1 fi.B 4672 2.4 4.0 20.3 22 44s9 2A ]5 zez 1.e 44)] 2.a Paso area. nay uaea we-9 mme Bottom Depth -ZOO Depth Sampled ft1 rem c Do m A- Sa9532.1 0.5 29 ]1 2].] 5.4 8.4 6,5 2].0 a.5 ,anah eay aree E. Time Bottom D.'I Tod Depth Sampled fl Tem L DO m S,Con 6 Salinity t 0.5 31 22 3 )20 1.9 3.5 20.1 B.B 3 )01 1.9 6.5 2].3 2.8 3662 10 canm, eay ¢axes WO-11 Tlme Baflom Depth -BOO Dap Sampled Tem L DO m IL s Shost Salinity t D.5 316 a.3 3541 18 3.0 28.1 48 4560 18 5.5 2).T 25 3520 1.0 sandl oay WO8 Time Bottom Depth. 6.Ott Depth sampled ft Tem C DO m IL SP.Lon s salinity 1 0.5 30.1 65 4a20 2A 1 3.0 30,11 BA 4886 2.4 8.5 30 59 4088 2.4 ,ana,, eay 4axea WO-12 Tune Baflom Depth. 811 Depth sampled fl - Tem C DO d Sp.Lon s1 6allnity t 0.5 30.7 e.] 03W 2.3 4.0 28.5 3.5 4A05 Z3 11 7,6 28.31 2.51 6461 24 rono area, eay Laaaa WQ-13 Time Bottom Depth-6.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tem 'C DO nah Spoon S Salinity t 0.5 30 62 4456 2.4 3.01 2821 2.6 4421 2.3 5sl 28.21 2.1 4,422 28 rono area, oay eases _ chocowlntty tray -surface Water Quoddy saafie8cs - secant Salinity _ Tem °c DO(or l 1.51 twit ChoeowlnRy Bay - Mean 29.5 5.4 6403.3 2.7 Chocowinity say -Min 28.6 25 50110.0 2.5 ChocowlnHy Bay -Mae 29.9 BA 6580.0 2.7 Bay lakes -Surface Water Quality Statistics SOCon salinity Tem JmB21 IpJ (RIM Bay Lakes - Mean 29.0 S.1 4237.9 2.2 eay lakes -Min 27.3 1.8 3520.0 1.8 Bay Lakes - Max 31.6 9.3 4820.0 2.4 2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay lakes, Chomwinity, NC 713112009 Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 7/31/2009 done from bulkhead at ends of canals. Station Station Depth Sampled salinity WQ-1 fl Tem C DO m 2 3 Can (S 1 rma Bottom Depth station d l removed from Sampling er al20DSDWQRe mart WQ-] nme Banom DepN Depth Sampled Oft)TempC DO h Lan Sp s Salinity h Near Station T, sampled from seeing pier Dep Sampl H Saliniy WQ-2 R T.-c 00 h — .Con S Time Bottom Depth am ..a mmoyed from sion2lors Ier 613009 oW0 Re meth WQ3 Time Bottom Depth Depth sampled Oft Tem L Do m IL)S Con S Salinity ,.no, .....na—a— a-eamme. on ......... wow rime Bonom Depth Depth Sampled fl ram °c DO m ti s .con s Salinity t Lnocowmlry, Sharon not sampled on 7131rspo5 WO-5 Time Bonom Depth Depth Sampled I Ot,IT,rap rj DO m 2 So Con S Salinity 0 cnocdwmlly Spoons not sampled an 7nln009 WOA rma Bottom Depth Depth Sampled fl Tem °C DO m IL S .Can 6(Poll Salinity Ln emainny station not Sampled on7nni as Depth Sampled Salinity WQ-12 m Tem C DO m IL s .Con S rime Bottom Depth Spllon pl2 removetl from Somalian per MOOS DWQ Reddest Choccarmiy Bay - Mean WA WA NIA WA Choaowinfty Bay - Min WA WA WA WA Chocasirun Bay -Max NIA WA WA WA WO-9 Time BDnom D¢pm-4.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tape,'C DO anti(Poll S13.1 Salinity 0.5 29.8 se . 7S 3.5 29.3 5.6 1. sampled m varyheatl of venal from OWkEead WO-10 rma Banom Depth-a.ort- Depth Sampled fl Tem 200 man sp.Lon salinity 0.5 29.] 0.1 1.280 7.3 3.5 29.5 3.1 1278 7.3 aamprea ar wry neaa WO-11 Time Bottom Depth- t.5fl Depth Sampled n rem c DO m 6p.Can (m Salinity (Poll 0.5 3D.5 6.0 1.299 7.4 Battered seven, neaa on coital prom attention! Wo-t3Sh Time Bonom Depth Depth sampled Tem Cc) Dom 2 Sp.Con s Salinity rvu,s nm,au WQ-16 Tme Bottom Depth Depth Sampled fl Tem L DO m Sp.Co. 3 Salinity nua—ami.. Time Time Bonom DepN-2.0fl Denh Sampled fl Tamp OO m h seODn S Salinity 1 0.5 39.9 0. 7.9 1393 1.5 1.5 29? 5.4 1,3011 J.4 Bay lakes -Surface Water OwIlly Statistics SO.Con Balmily, Tem °C Dome (am (RO Baylakea-Mean. 29.9 SA 1295.0 TA 2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC aiv=09 Station Depth Salinity WO-1 Sam led R Tem 0 DO m M1 S .Con 5 t Time Bottom Depth 6MIlon 0l Feamm, he Somalia 1 0,er 612009 DWO Re neat Depth salinity WO-2 Sam led X rem D DO M1 5 .can s t Time Bottom Depth -ma-d g i hemmed M1om Gam tin ar 820090WQ Ro uest WO-3 Time Bottom Depm-5.On Depth sam led n Tem c Do /L s can s selinity 0.5 29.] 82 1311 ].5 1 2,611 1333 ].] 4,01 29.21 1341 ]T ChocoMnlly Bey -open water WO< Time Bottom Depth-3.Ofl Depth Sem led Tent C Do m M1 s .con S Sellnny 0.5 2S6 50 1335 ).0 2.5 29.5 5.3 1341 7.4 ,.nuwmnny ouy- aMen ^'ma, WG5 Time Bottom Depth-3aft Depth Sem led X Tem L DO m M1 S .Oon S Salinity 1 0.5 29.3 4.7 1,3431 ].] 2.5 28.3 2.9 1340 ].] Mall -made eternal In Cnm'aa nlly Bay W0.6 Mine Bottom Depth. 3.0X Depth Sam led n Tam c Dom S .can s Salinity t os 256 39 t,3u ]s Z51 27.9 3.41 1.3251 7.6 manmade cnanne, in --ma, any. nine ez,aemv Daplt Salinity Wo-12 sam Ina Tem c Do m IL s .con s Mine Bottom Depth Stanon012 mmowdlrom SamYlingpar612009DWQReauem � I WO-) Tfine .mm. Depth. 5AX Depth Samplad X Tem •C Do M1 S,Con 5 Sillmil 1 0.5 30.3 6.9 1,257 ).1 2.0 30.1 a.] 1257 ].2 4.5 29.3 3.2 1.2]0 ].3 W69 Time eattam Deplb 4.0fl Depth sampled fl Tam 'c Dom sp.Con Salinity t D.s 30.3 e.o 1 a e.9 2B 28.0 5.0 1.22] 6.9 &5l 29a 3.0 1 220 0.9 WO-10 Time Bonn. Depth-4.efl Depth Sampled Tem 'c DO A-s S,Can SaOnlly t 0.51 3D.1 9.6 1190 6.8 zol 29.6 6.7 1188 6.7 3.5 282 3BI 1183 6.7 W 11 Than Boman Depth. 4on Depth Sampled Tam •C oo m M1 BD.Don s Sallnlry 0.5 30A e.t 1 t8T 0.8 2.0 29.4 d.] 1188 S.8 3.5 30.1 2.5 1160 8.8 WQ-13 Time Bonom Depth -Safi Depth Sampled X Team,C DO m M1 Sp.Can a Salinity 1 0.5 30 6.1 1 0o ]2 4B 28.8 4.0 1 ]0 ]2 T.0 29.4 3.6 12]0 ].2 FBD,PUh-6.on Depth Semple0 fl I Tam C I DO m M1 6p.con S S(no)y 0.5 3o s.a t2]4 )a 4.0 29.8 4.5 1,276 ].3 7.0 39A 2] 1,2)1 ]J chacewlnny Bay -Surface Water Quality Shahid" Be.Den S.RapW Tem •c Dam 1ABI tpp1l Chocowlnity Bey- Mean 29,1 4.6 1332.a 7.6 chacewlnfly say •Min 31.8 2.8 1311'a ]A Chocowlniy Bay -Mu 29.7 62 1343.0 ].) Bay takes-Surfaae Water Quality Sta4stics Sp.con Selfinlor Temel'C1 DO1mgILl IBS1 /PB11 Bay lakes - Mean 29J SA 1230.0 7.0 Bay Laken-Mln 20.1 2.5 1166.0 6.6 Bay Lakes -Mee 30A 9.6 1276.0 7.3 Note: A "great many" mullet were noted in the Bay Lakes pond area during this sampling. Near the connection with Taylor Creek, a tide was flowing Into Bay Lakes waters over the existing rip rap and culverted area. A gar was seen in this area actively feeding on silversides and minnows. 2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chomwinity, NC 9/9/2009 Station Station Depin SamplM Sa6Nly WO-0 fl) Tem DO m M1 6 .Con S Time Bottom Depth Smtlpn Ht removed Bom Sampllnp cerW3009 DWO Repuest Wp-J Tvne BOtlom DepN-S.Oft D plh Sampled Tem C OO m Sp.COn 8 SaOniry 0S 35 4./ 1313 J 6 20 25 4A 1313 ].5 4.5 25 4.0 1310 ].8 Notes: eampled In Chav my Bey at aW well&b P.M area. Bey lakes Depth Sampled SalinR WO-2 ram •c Do m a s con rme Bottom Depth $YIiOn H3 rempvetl irom5ampting perfiR009 DWC Repuest L yJO.i Time Batlom Dep6n3.5ft Depth 5ampl.d OR Tem DO m S Aon S) SeOnfty 0.5 26.9 2.96 1609 03 3.01 24.91 2.841 1. 0.6 WO-4 TMe BORom DBp8F3.Oft Depm SamplM Tem 'C OO m S .Can S Satiny 05 24A 2.3 1353 To 25 24 .1 22 143s 83 ..npapmnm oar open water vv E Tme Bodam Oep0F3.OR Deli SamplM ITemp C DO S .Can S 5auray 0.5 242 22 1321 7.6 z5l 34.1 12.1 1323 ] 6 WOE Tme BoRom Dept-3.OM1 Ioepm Sampled Oft)Tem C DO S.Con( SeOnfty p.5 24.1 2.0 1 Y9 ].5 2.51 241 1.71 1.305 ZS WO-9 Time Bottum DepRF4.Oft Tem C m m h S,con S salinity A 25.5 SO 1293 7.4 Canal,Bay Lakes WO-10 Time eonpm DeM, a oft Depm Sampled fl amp'C DO mOppil Sp.Con Salinity 0.5 249 81 1283 T4 3.5 24.9 46 1280 7.3 WO-11 T a BoUrn Dept, 3.Sn Tem C DO(,a) Sp.Con Be" M 26.2 6.3 1263 72 25.1 33 1 82 72 ...nai nemess map, liar rases WO-13 Tme Botlom Oeptlf SOR oepm Sampled 0 Tem C DO Sp.COn (s S ( (00) 1 0.5 25.3 4A 1310 ]5 60 25 30 1313 T6 ].0 25 3.5 1312 1.5 POM area, day takes WQidOR Time Botlom Depm-BOR Depm Sampled Tem C 00 mNS) Sp.Con Salinty hand 0.5 253 Ca 1313 7.5 4.0 HB 2.3 1313 ].5 7.0 NS 22 1Ji2 ].5 Chocowlnity Bay- Surface Water Quarts Slaledes Sampled salinity _ 8 tp.C_ Sam WQ-12 (R Tem 'C 00 m S .Can S Temp rcf OO�gm L� fpJ fpQt me Chocovdnfty Bay -Bean 24A 2A 1360.9 7.9 Bottom Depm SUBonY l2.moved from Sampling per W2009 DWO Repuest Choeminity Bay -Min 24A 1.7 1299.0 7.5 ChdcowinRy Bay -Max 24.9 3.0 14412.0 8A Bay takes -Surface Water Quality Slated'a SalinM1v TemprC1 DO(m9-1 fY31 I220 Bay Lake. -Mean 2fi.1 dA 1298.9 7.4 Baytakes-MN 2A6 22 126LO 7.2 Bay Lakes -Max 262 6.7 13110 7.6 2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC 10/29/2009 Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 10/29/2009 done in conjunction with Fish Population Study of waters in Bay Lakes Station Station Depth Salinity WO-1 Sam led fl Tamp'C DO m S .Can S t Time Bottom Depth Station IT 1 i6ihed from Sam Iin er 612009 DWD Re Last WO -](it) Time Bottom Depth- S.Oft DepN Sampled Tem 'C 0. Dom Sp.Con S Salinity o t) ON 19.1 8.3 1658 B8 2.0 19.2 7.1 1.8]9 10 1.708 10 Pond area, Bay lakes DepN Salinity WO-2 Sam led fl Temp (TJ DO m S .Con S t Time Bottom Depth Sletlon tl 2 removed from SamplingperMOO9 DWD Re oast T WQ-3 rare Bottom Depth Depth Sampled ft Tamp °C DO m So Can S` Salinity t Gnowwlli ty stations not sampled an ion&2o09 W04 Time Bottom Depth Depth Sampled fl Tamp °C DO m IL Sp.Con S Salinity t Chocowinity, Stations not sampled on 1012912009 WO-5 Time Bono, Depth Depth Sampled to Tamp °C DO 5 .Con S Salinity ! Gnocowlmry stations not sampled on IDanzWe WO-8 Time Boflam Depth DepN Sam letl fl Tem °C DO m L S .Con TS Salinity t Ghocowlnity, stations not sampled on 1012912009 Depth Salinity WO-12 Sampled ft Temr, I'd DO m $ .Can S t Time Bottom Depth Station tl 12 romoyed from Sam Iin er 62009 OWQ Request w0-9 Time Bottom Depth- 5.5ft Depth Sampled ft Tam °C DO(, Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 19.2 9.2 15]8 9.3 2.0 19.1 7.9 1,599 9.4 5.0 19.3 7.4 1630 9.B Canal, Bay Laken WO-10 Time Bottom DeptR S.Sfl Depth Sampled fl Tamp 'C DO m Sp.Con iS Salinity t 0.5 19.4 92 1 We 9.2 2.0 19.4 9.0 1.575 92 5.0 19.9 ]J 1.598 9.4 Canal, Bay takes WO-11 Time Bottom Depth-5oft Depth Sampled fl Tam °C DO m ) SP.Con S Salinity t 1 0.51 19.6 9.1 1,5531 9.1 2.0 19.5 9.0 1556 9.1 4.0 19.5 8.8 1,560 9.1 Cana, ned,ea, n,de, say '- 11WIM0. m Depth-B.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tam °C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t0.5 19.1 8.1 1585 9.3 4.0 19.1 8.1 - 16w 9.4 7.0 191 7.91 1,621 9.5 I.F. a,ea, oay-.e. WO-14 Time Sahara Depth-8.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tamp°C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.5 192 ].4 1'sm 9.1 4.01 19.21 7.4 1694 9.9 T.0 19.3 ].2 1 ]OS 10 retie area, say Ta.aa WO-15 Time Bottom Depth-12.Oft Depth Sampled fl Tam •C DO m Sp.Con S Salinity t 0.51 19.1 8.4 1880 9.8 8.0 19.3 7.3 17401 10.' 110 19.3 7.3 1,]55 10.4 amping amadp adoe0 Tor mu sampnng date onry, locama near manner ameon p12. In S comer or pond, Bay Lakes Bay Lakes - Surrece Water Quality StaOstics Simon. Salina TompVC1 DOfirl i9st leel Chocowinity Bay -Mean WA WA WA WA Bay Lakes - Mean 19.3 8.0 16319 9.6 Chocowinity Bay - Min WA NIA WA N/A Bay Lakes - Min 19.0 6.7 150.0 9.1 Chowwinity Bay - Max WA NIA WA NIA Bay Lakes - Mae 19.6 9.2 I'll" 9.11 14 13 12 J � 11 E C 10 N 9 X O 8 > 7 O 5 N y 0 5 N R 4 L > 3 a 2 1 0 Ambient Dissolved Oxygen Chocowinity Bay & Bay Lakes o� Q) o� NA Sample Date October 208 2009 01-June 2007-October 2009 Sample Location Land Management Group, Inc. •Chocowinity Bay www.lmgroup.net }Bay Lakes NOTE: Data points were not taken at the Chocowinity Bay location on July 31, 2009 or October 29, 2009. Land Management Group's Standard Calibration and Use Procedures, YSI 85 meter. Calibration, Operation and Maintenance of YSI 85 Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity, Salinity, and Temperature Meter 1.0 Calibration Dissolved oxygen (DO) is calibrated prior to daily use to ensure accurate water quality readings. It is recommended that DO be calibrated in situ directly prior to field sampling to ensure that atmospheric parameters are similar during calibration and field sampling. Conductivity does not need to be calibrated daily, however, should be calibrated to specific concentrations based on sampling location. Salinity is based on conductivity. Temperature is factory calibrated. Dissolved Oxygen Calibration a. Ensure that the sponge in the calibration chamber is damp with DI water. b. Visually inspect the membrane for nicks, scratched and/or air bubbles. If any of these defects are observed, the DO membrane must be replaced prior to proceeding with calibration and field use. C. Gently dry the surface of the DO membrane, paying attention not to nick or scratch the surface of the membrane. d. Insert probe into calibration chamber just so that o-ring is in. e. Turn YSI 85 ON using ON/OFF button. Wait for initial readings to appear. f. Press the MODE button until the dissolved oxygen is displayed in % saturation. g. Wait for the dissolved oxygen and temperature readings to stabilize. The manufacturer recommends approximately 15 minutes. h. Press and release the UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW simultaneously. I. The LCD will prompt for the local altitude in hundreds of feet. j. Use arrow keys to adjust altitude if necessary. Press ENTER when altitude is correct. k. The instrument should now display CAL in lower left (Calibration Mode), calibration value in the lower right (100%), and the actual dissolved oxygen % on the main display. I. After the instrument has equilibrated, press the ENTER button to save the reading as 100% air -saturated calibration. m. The YSI 85 should then return to normal operation. NOTE: It may be necessary to re -calibrate after machine has been turned off. Check instrument regularly. Conductivity Calibration a. Turn instrument ON and allow initial readings to stabilize. b. Press MODE button until conductivity is displayed. C. Use a certified calibration solution close to sample conductivity. 50 mS/cm for seawater 10 mS/cm for brackish water 0.100 mS/cm for freshwater d. Place at least 3 inches of solution in clean glass beaker. Land Management Group, Inc. YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures e. Insert probe into the beaker deep enough to completely cover oval shaped hole on the side of probe. Suspend probe in solution, do not rest on bottom. f. Allow at least 60 seconds for equilibration. g. Press and release UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW simultaneously. h. The CAL symbol will appear at bottom left of display (Calibration Mode). I. Use UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW to adjust reading to Standard solution conductivity. j. When reading is exact value of standard, press ENTER button to save calibration. k. The word SAVE will flash across display. I. The YSI is ready for normal use. NOTE: Conductivity does not need to be calibrated each time machine is turned on. 2.0 Operation The YSI 85 DO membrane should be inspected for nicks, scratches and/or air bubbles prior to use at each site. If any of the aforementioned defects are observed, the DO membrane must be changed are re -calibrated prior to obtaining water quality readings. At each site, physical parameters are measured at the surface, mid -depth and bottom or until the cable connecting the handheld logger with to the water quality probe has been fully extended. Surface samples are obtained ca. 0.1 m below the surface to assure that the water quality probe remains submerged. Vertical profiles of field parameters should be obtained whenever possible. However, discretion should be used in shallow areas so as to avoid re -suspension of bottom sediment. It is important to avoid contact between the water quality probe and bottom sediment. The dissolved oxygen sensor on the YSI 85 does not feature a "stirring independent' dissolved oxygen membrane. As such, the water quality probe should be gently stirred while obtained readings to assure accuracy in the recorded data. In waters with a notable current and/or tidal flow, a downrigger weight is utilized to assure that the water quality probe is recording field parameters at the correct depth. Obtaining Measurements The temperature is always displayed on the LCD. Use MODE key to scroll between parameters. The following sequence represents successive modes on the LCD: D.O. (% sat.) -) D.O. (mg/L) 4 Cond. (uS or mS 4 Specific Cond. (uS or mS) 4 Salinity (ppt) If the instrument is displaying Specific Conductance (temp compensated conductivity), the OC will be flashing. Dissolved Oxygen probe must be stirred in the sample at rate of 1 fYsec to get accurate readings - Oz consumed at tip of electrode if probe is not stirred. Salinity is determined directly from conductivity. Salinity measurements are calculated by the instrument using the Standard Methods algorithms, and referenced to 15 OC. Land Management Group, Inc. YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures Rinse probe with DI water and store in the calibration chamber. Upon completion of field sampling, the dissolved oxygen calibration is checked to assure that the original field calibration is still accurate. The DO calibration is checking by gently drying the DO _ membrane and inserting the probe into the calibration chamber just so that o-ring is in. Acceptable readings should fall within 5% of the calibrated values lie. 95% to 105%) 3.0 Maintenance Given that the majority of instrument use takes place during the summer months, the instrument is maintained monthly during the off-season to assure quality assurance and control. During routine maintenance of the YSI 85, the DO membrane is inspected for nicks, scratches and/or air bubbles. If any of the aforementioned defects are observed, the DO membrane is changed according to factory instructions and re -calibrated. If no defects are observed on the DO membrane, the instrument is calibrated as usual. The sponge within the probe storage chamber is also checked for sufficient dampness. The YSI 85 is analyzed for accuracy at least twice yearly utilizing a 0% DO solution available thru the manufacturer. During routine accuracy testing, the DO is calibrated and the probe is placed in the 0% DO solution. The reading should be less then 2% DO in 3-5 minutes. If the instrument does not obtain a 2% DO reading as referenced, the instrument is sent to the manufacturer for cleaning and/or repair. YSI instrumentation available through the UNCW Aquatic Ecology Laboratory has also been utilized for the comparison of field parameters on occasion. Land Management Group, Inc. YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 -6 -12 -18 -24 -30 TYPICAL TIDE GUAGE COMPARISON ----------------------------------------- - BAY --- LAKE -Al --------AVG. -IDARANGE TIDAL = "/DAY -- -- ----------------------------12 ------.1--- -- ---------------------- ---- - - - ------------- --------------';---------- ,,H-CQWI-ITY_.BAY__#2--------AVG. TIDAL RANGE = 14.9"/DAY 4 yy - ---d------------------------------------ E 1 -- _ T - t �Jt' ,4,CH0C VlNlTY Y #2 i Y/ �} 11. ----------- + ---------I--- ---- - 17 ZC +.jai 14 - --------------------------------------------------- - ----- ��r - XE #1 h Q -------------- tiG�. ®r---------------------------- t --- --- � ` .;--- -- `\\lp : OO` O` O` O` O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O NA t` b r F,11 ------------------------- BAY -------------- j------------- w PREPARED BY LMG Tides GUAGE#EBD9FCE CHOCOWINITY BAY G UAG E#A286960 BAY LAKE NC DENR DO Model Performed by Land Management Group, Inc. 3/2009 Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC MATRIX OF DO MODELING RESULTS, Marina Basin DISSOLVED OXYGEN SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND g O /m /day mg/L 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 8.0 6.7 6.3 5.8 5.4 7.5 6.5 6.1 5.7 5.2 7.0 6.4 6.0 5.5 5.1 6.5 6.3 5.8 5.4 4.9 6.0 6.1 5.7 5.2 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.1 --- 5.0 5.8 5.4 4.9 --- 4.5 5.7 5.2 --- --- 'Shaded values indicate a DO concentration above the State standard of 5.0 mg/L. Model Inputs (March, 2009) Average Channel Depth= 4 ft Average Basin Depth (existing)= 9 ft Channel Surface Area= 86,363 sq ft Basin Surface Area (existing)= 674,875 sq ft Tidal Amplitude= 1.0 ft Sediment Oxygen Demand= range, see above Ambient Dissolved Oxygen= range, see above Saturation Dissolved Oxygen= 8.03 mg/L Return Flow Factor- 0 Decay Coefficient= 1/day Re -aeration Coefficient= 0.3/day Channel Boat Activity= 0 Boat-hrs/day Marina Boast Activity= 0 Boat-hrs/day STATE CLIMATE OFFICE OF NORTH CAROLINA NC CRONOS Database Data retrieval from KOCW - Warren Field for 2007-06-01 thru 2009-10-31 882 records for this period of record (99.8% data available; 2 missing reci Number of Records Date Compiled 6/1/2007 20 (83%) 6/2/2007 23 (96%) 6/3/2007 22 (92%) 6/4/2007 23 (96%) 6/5/2007 23 (96%) 6/6/2007 23 (96%) 6/7/2007 23 (96%) 6/8/2007 22 (92%) 6/9/2007 24 (100%) 6/10/2007 23 (96%) 6/11/2007 23 (96%) 6/12/2007 22 (92%) 6/13/2007 24 (100%) 6/14/2007 24 (100%) 6/15/2007 24 (100%) 6/16/2007 22 (92%) 6/17/2007 23 (96%) 6/18/2007 22 (92%) 6/19/2007 23 (96%) 6/20/2007 22 (92%) 6/21/2007 24 (100%) 6/22/2007 23 (96%) 6/23/2007 23 (96%) 6/24/2007 23 (96%) 6/25/2007 22 (92%) 6/26/2007 _ 22 (92%) 6/27/2007 23 (96%) 6/28/2007 21 (88%) 6/29/2007 23 (96%) 6/30/2007 23 (96%) 7/1/2007 24 (100%) 7/2/2007 24 (100%) 7/3/2007 24 (100%) 7/4/2007 24 (100%) 7/5/2007 22 (92%) 7/6/2007 22 (92%) 7/7/2007 24 (100%) 7/8/2007 23 (96%) 7/9/2007 24 (100%) 7/10/2007 21 (88%) 7/11/2007 21 (88%) 7/12/2007 23 (96%) daily MAX of 10m Wind Speed (mph) 10.1 13 21 19.9 17 11 13 11 14.1 13 8.1 10.1 15 11 11 8.1 8.1 8.1 14.1 10.1 13 10.1 6.9 13 19.9 8.9 11 13 14.1 10.1 13 10.1 6.9 8.9 13 13 16.1 10.1 10.1 11 17 6.9 daily AVG of 10m Wind Speed (mph) 4.3 3.8 9.8 10.8 9.7 5.7 6.2 8 6 5.5 2.3 2.5 7.2 6.1 4 2.7 4.2 4.5 6.1 5.1 3.8 5.1 4.2 6 3.9 4.6 5.7 8 7.3 5.2 5.4 1.7 1.1 3.8 6 7.9 3 4.2 5.9 4.7 8.6 5.1 daily AVG of 10m Wind Direction (degrees) 93.5 67 150.9 226.1 227.8 219.6 154.8 215.5 228.8 84.3 71.3 83.2 42.9 66.7 90.4 103.2 192.2 172.3 198.7 181.8 108.8 171.7 89.6 95.2 116.4 147.7 159.6 211.9 213.5 196.5 58.8 19.6 27.5 111.7 145.5 205.9 80.8 129.1 185.8 153.8 174.3 232.5 1I- 7/13/2007 21 (88%) 7/14/2007 22 (92%) 7/15/2007 24 (100%) 7/16/2007 22 (92%) 7/17/2007 20 (83%) 7/18/2007 23 (96%) 7/19/2007 24 (100%) 7/20/2007 24 (100%) 7/21/2007 23 (96%) 7/22/2007 24 (100%) 7/23/2007 22 (92%) 7/24/2007 23 (96%) 7/25/2007 20 (83%) 7/26/2007 20 (83%) 7/27/2007 14 (58%) 7/28/2007 10 (42%) 7/29/2007 17 (71 %) 7/30/2007 20 (83%) 7/31/2007 22 (92%) 11 5 43.6 8/l/2007 21 (88%) 8.9 3 94.8 8/2/2007 20 (83%) 8.9 3.2 60 8/3/2007 19 (79%) 8.1 2.9 87.9 8/4/2007 16 (67%) 6 3.3 136.9 8/5/2007 20 (83%) 8.9 5.6 178.5 8/6/2007 20 (83%) 8.9 5.5 176 8/7/2007 18 (75%) 8.1 5.3 173.9 8/8/2007 22 (92%) 8.1 5.6 210.9 8/9/2007 22 (92%) 10.1 5.5 194.1 8/10/2007 19 (79%) 11 6.6 187.9 8/11/2007 18 (75%) 8.9 4.5 40.6 8/12/2007 14 (58%) 4.9 2.1 61.4 8/13/2007 21 (88%) 8.1 2.5 95.2 8/14/2007 16 (67%) 8.1 4.5 185 8/15/2007 19 (79%) 8.1 3.1 76.8 8/16/2007 16 (67%) 13 8.7 197.5 8/17/2007 19 (79%) 11 7.6 196.3 8/18/2007 20 (83%) 13 6.3 120.5 8/19/2007 20 (83%) 11 6 133 8/20/2007 22 (92%) 14.1 9 208.6 8/21/2007 19 (79%) 17 8.2 227.4 8/22/2007 19 (79%) 8.1 2.9 45.8 8/23/2007 17 (71 %) 6.9 3.6 74.7 8/24/2007 20 (83%) 8.9 3.2 89 8/25/2007 16 (67%) 8.1 5.7 213.1 8/26/2007 20 (83%) 10.1 3.3 126.5 8/27/2007 18 (75%) 11 2.6 70 8/28/2007 19 (79%) 11 5.1 87.9 8/29/2007 22 (92%) 6.9 3.5 33.6 8/30/2007 16 (67%) 8.1 3 69.4 8/31/2007 15 (63%) 6.9 2.4 61.3 9/l/2007 20 (83%) 11 4.9 27.5 9/2/2007 20 (83%) 14.1 6.3 118.5 9/3/2007 20 (83%) 10.1. 3.1 . 71.5 9/4/2007 19 (79%) 6.9 2 34.2 9/5/2007 16 (67%) 8.9 3 98.1 9/6/2007 19 (79%) 13 4.3 75.3 9/7/2007 22 (92%) 13 3.7 83.2 9/8/2007 20 (83%) 10.1 5.1 61 _ 9/9/2007 20 (83%) 15 8.7 253.5 9/10/2007 23 (96%) 10.1 6.2 202.6 9/11/2007 16 (67%) 17 9.9 216.9 9/12/2007 19 (79%) 9.2 4.3 143.2 9/13/2007 21 (88%) 19.6 7.6 97.1 9/14/2007 14 (58%) 14.1 7.4 127.1 9/15/2007 17 (71 %) 11 6.9 147.6 9/16/2007 18 (75%) 14.1 6.9 103.3 9/17/2007 19 (79%) 15 7.8 105.8 9/18/2007 22 (92%) 16.1 8.8 130.5 9/19/2b07 17 (71 %) 14.1 8.7 185.3 9/20/2007 17 (71 %) 8.9 6.1 50.6 9/21/2007 21 (88%) 10.1 5.2 68.1 9/22/2007 18 (75%) 6.9 2.1 110.6 9/23/2007 20 (83%) 8.1 2.6 37 9/24/2007 21 (88%) 8.1 2.3 41 9/25/2007 21 (88%) 6 2.4 71 9/26/2007 17(71%) 6.9 2.4 66.5 9/27/2007 19 (79%) 8.1 2.6 84.7 9/28/2007 20 (83%) 10.1 5.7 270 9/29/2007 19 (79%) 13 5.5 137.9 9/30/2007 23 (96%) 15 7.9 94.8 10/l/2007 18 (75%) 14.1 7.3 42.2 10/2/2007 17 (71 %) 10.1 6.5 50 10/3/2007 20 (83%) 8.1 3.2 45.5 10/4/2007 18 (75%) 8.9 4.1 43.9 10/5/2007 19 (79%) 8.9 4.9 46.8 10/6/2007 21 (88%) 8.1 3.8 59 10/7/2007 18 (75%) 6 1.8 93.9 10/8/2007 15 (63%) 8.1 3 120 10/9/2007 20 (83%) 8.9 5.4 210.5 10/10/2007 16 (67%) 8.9 4 168.1 10/11/2007 19 (79%) 14.1 6.5 27 10/12/2007 21 (88%) 10.1 3 181 10/13/2007 22 (92%) 10.1 2.5 105.5 10/14/2007 18 (75%) 8.1 2.7 155.6 10/15/2007 18 (75%) 8.1 3.1 63.9 10/16/2007 20 (83%) 6 1 31 10/17/2007 19 (79%) 6 1.6 50 10/18/2007 19 (79%) 15 4.5 97.9 10/19/2007 19 (79%) 13.8 6.4 150 10/20/2007 19 (79%) 10.1 4.7 185.8 10/21/2007 22 (92%) 8.1 2.4 45.9 10/22/2007 23 (96%) 10.1 3.2 63.9 10/23/2007 24 (100%) 16.1 6.4 141.3 10/24/2007 20 (83%) 16.1 6.5 146.5 10/25/2007 18 (75%) 8.9 4.4 70 10/26/2007 15 (63%) 9.2 4.2 90 10/27/2007 13 (54%) 8.1 4.2 209.2 10/28/2007 19 (79%) 14.1 7.1 207.4 10129/2007 18 (75%) 17 6.1 155.6 10/30/2007 17 (71 %) 6.9 1.7 37.6 10/31/2007 21 (88%) 10.1 3 45.2 11/1/2007 20 (83%) 13 3 71 11/2/2007 19 (79%) 23 14.5 176.8 11/3/2007 18 (75%) 16.1 6.8 214.4 11 /4/2007 17 (71 %) 8.1 1.3 37.6 11 /5/2007 17 (71 %) 9.2 3.1 134.7 11/6/2007 18 (75%) 14.1 7.3 264.4 11/7/2007 18 (75%) 10.1 3.3 164.4 11/8/2007 16 (67%) 8.1 2.4 113.1 11/9/2007 15 (63%) 4.9 1.1 58.7 11/10/2007 18 (75%) 14.1 5.7 228.9 11/11/2007 21 (88%) 13 3.1 111.9 11/12/2007 18 (75%) 11 3.4 112.8 11113/2007 15 (63%) 13 3.5 125.3 11/14/2007 20 (83%) 8.1 4.2 154.5 11/15/2007 20 (83%) 17 6.9 213 11/16/2007 21 (88%) 13.8 4.5 179 11/17/2007 20 (83%) 8.1 3.1 108 11/18/2007 22 (92%) 8.1 1.5 101.8 11/19/2007 19 (79%) 5.8 2.3 112.6 11/20/2007 18 (75%) 11 2.8 87.2 11/21/2007 17 (71%) 14.1 6.3 160.6 11/22/2007 16 (67%) 19.9 10.3 208.8 11/23/2007 19 (79%) 15 8.3 210 11/24/2007 21 (88%) 11 5.4 109 11/25/2007 19 (79%) 6.9 2.3 24.7 11/26/2007 21 (88%) 10.4 4.6 103.8 11/27/2007 18 (75%) 16.1 5.9 223.9 11/28/2007 15 (63%) 11 4.7 49.3 11/29/2007 21 (88%) .8.9 1.9 77.1 11/30/2007 17(71%) 9.2 2.9 47.1 12/1/2007 16 (67%) 10.1 3.3 17.5 12/2/2007 22 (92%) 8.1 2.2 57.3 12/3/2007 17 (71 %) 17.9 12.1 272.4 1214/2007 18 (75%) 13 6.1 207.2 12/5/2007 21 (88%) 11.5 3.5 106.7 1216/2007 20 (83%) 19.9 9.1 149, 1217/2007 17 (71 %) 4.9 0.7 31.2 12/8/2007 23 (96%) 8.9 1 23.5 12/9/2007 18 (75%) 4.6 0.3 12.8 12/10/2007 19 (79%) 14.1 2.6 74.7 12/11/2007 19 (79%) 0 0 0 12/12/2007 23 (96%) 17.9 6.4 147.8 12/13/2007 18 (75%) 15 7 120 12/14/2007 15 (63%) 8.1 3.2 109.3 12/15/2007 22 (92%) 13 7.4 35.5 12/16/2007 19 (79%) 19.9 9.7 198.9 12/17/2007 20 (83%) 11.5 5.8 202 12/18/2007 17 (71 %) 4.9 0.9 37.1 12/19/2007 18 (75%) 11 2.8 85.6 12/20/2007 20 (83%) 6.9 1.9 43.5 12/21/2007 16 (67%) 13 8.7 39.4 12/22/2007 20 (83%) 15 9.2 43.5 12/23/2007 17 (71 %) 16.1 7.7 129.4 12/24/2007 19 (79%) 8.1 3.1 146.8 12/25/2007 15 (63%) 8.1 5.3 36.7 12/26/2007 20 (83%) 20.7 9.9 198.5 12/27/2007 15 (63%) 8.1 1.1 50 12/28/2007 19 (79%) 13 4.7 7 90 185.2 12/29/2007 21 (88%) 14.1 12/30/2007 22 (92%) 10.1 4.3 49.5 12/31/2007 21 (88%) 17.9 2.8 100 1/l/2008 18 (75%) 11 4.6 188.3 1/2/2008 19 (79%) 15 8.8 296.3 1/3/2008 20 (83%) 19.9 8.5 253.5 1/4/2008 17 (71 %) 10.1 1.8 69.4 1/5/2008 19 (79%) 13 3.8 142.6 1/6/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 3.5 132.2 1/7/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 2.5 107.7 1/8/2008 18 (75%) 13 4.2 121.7 1/9/2008 19 (79%) 21 6.6 159.5 1/10/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 4.7 78.3 1/11/2008 21 (88%) 14.1 8.4 169 1/12/2008 20 (83%) 8.9 5 78.5 1/13/2008 14 (58%) 8.9 5.8 91.4 1/14/2008 15 (63%) 6.9 2.5 158.7 1/15/2008 18 (75%) 13 4.1 146.1 1/16/2008 21 (88%) 8.9 2.6 149 1/17/2008 16 (67%) 10.1 7.2 116.3 1/18/2008 18 (75%) 8.1 4.4 193.3 1/19/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 4.3 208.7 1/20/2008 20 (83%) 15 7.1 299.5 1/21/2008 20 (83%) 8.9 4.1 95.5 1/22/2008 16 (67%) 13 3 96.3 1/23/2008 19 (79%) 6.9 3.8 186.3 1/24/2008 22 (92%) 13 4.7 192.3 1/25/2008 20 (83%) 13 5.2 203 1/26/2008 16 (67%) 2.4 0.2 13.1 1/27/2008 21 (88%) 10.1 3.8 162.9 1/28/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 3.3 151.7 1/29/2008 19 (79%) 15 8.4 193.2 1/30/2008 19 (79%) 17.9 9.7 192.6 1/31/2008 19 (79%) 15 8.8 52.6 2/l/2008 22 (92%) 19.9 11.1 172.3 2/2/2008 23 (96%) 6.9 2.6 104.8 2/3/2008 21 (88%) 6.9 1.7 114.8 2/4/2008 15 (63%) 0 0 0 2/5/2008 17 (71 %) 17 6.9 174.1 2/6/2008 16(67%) 21 11.9 211.3 2/7/2008 19 (79%) 21 9.3 171.1 2/8/2008 19 (79%) 8.1 2 104.2 2/9/2008 18 (75%) 15 6.3 155 2/10/2008 16 (67%) 23.9 15 261.3 2/11/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 3.6 160.6 2/12/2008 19 (79%) 17.9 8.4 119.5 2113/2008 17 (71 %) 19.9 12.1 235.9 2/14/2008 16 (67%) 11 3.9 156.3 2/15/2008 16 (67%) 11 5.6 175 2/16/2008 20 (83%) 13 6.5 45 2/17/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 5.7 96.1 2/18/2008 14 (58%) 21 11.8 233.6 2/19/2008 19 (79%) 21.9 7.6 194.2 2/20/2008 20 (83%) 17.9 7.9 135 2/21/2008 21 (88%) 13 8.1 61.4 2/22/2008 20 (83%) 8.9 5.8 190 2/23/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 5.5 205 2/24/2008 19 (79%) 8.1 4.6 53.7 2/25/2008 21 (88%) 6.9 1.4 54.3 2/26/2008 18 (75%) 16.1 6.6 145.6 2/27/2008 11 (46%) 13 8.2 291.8 2/28/2008 15 (63%) 14.1 4.4 170 2/29/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 4.8 105 3/1/2008 23 (96%) 17 9.5 210.9 3/2/2008 14 (58%) 8.1 4.3 82.1 3/3/2008 19 (79%) 13 6.7 136.8 3/4/2008 17 (71 %) 17 11 161.2 _ 3/5/2008 19 (79%) 15 7.4 197.4 - 3/6/2008 18 (75%) 11 3.6 58.3 3/7/2008 21 (88%) 19.9 7.5 111.4 3/8/2008 14 (58%) 33.1 18.5 217.9 3/9/2008 14 (58%) 14.1 5.8 231.4 3/10/2008 15 (63%) 6.9 3 72.7 - 3/11/2008 16 (67%) 6.9 2.4 71.9 3/12/2008 17 (71 %) 11 5 178.2 3/13/2008 20 (83%) 13 4.7 115.5 3/14/2008 17(71%) 17.9 8.6 197.6 3/15/2008 13 (54%) 15 8.9 195.4 3/16/2008 20 (83%) 14.1 7.1 218 3/17/2008 20 (83%) 14.1 6.8 130.5 3/18/2008 13 (54%) 10.1 5.5 95.4 3/19/2008 13 (54%) 21 13.7 193.8 3/20/2008 12 (50%) 21.9 i3.4 263.3 3/21/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 4.7 183.3 3/22/2008 20 (83%) 21 10.9 186.5 3/23/2008 19 (79%) 13 6.8 82.1 3/24/2008 17(71%) 15 8.2 211.8 3/25/2008 13 (54%) 8.1 6.4 279.2 3/26/2008 15 (63%) 17 11 218 3/27/2008 17 (71 %) 14.1 9.6 208.8 3/28/2008 13 (54%) 19.9 10.9 216.2 3/29/2008 14 (58%) 16.1 9.3 46.4 3/30/2008 18 (75%) 15 8.9 43.9 3/31/2008 15 (63%) 13 7.3 113.3 4/1/2008 17 (71 %) 11 8 183.5 4/2/2008 15 (63%) 15 8.2 125.3 4/3/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 7.5 79.4 4/4/2008 17 (71%) 17 7.5 153.5 4/5/2008 17 (71 %) 10.1 5.5 144.7 4/6/2008 20 (83%) 13 7.4 135 4/7/2008 14 (58%) 13 8.6 69.3 4/8/2008 12 (50%) 11 9.4 183.3 4/9/2008 13 (54%) 8.9 5.5 129.2 4/10/2008 17 (71 %) 8.1 2.7 59.4 4/11/2008 15 (63%) 13 6.4 148 4/12/2008 10 (42%) 17.9 112 221 4/13/2008 19 (79%) 13 8.4 260 4/14/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 3.4 85.6 4/15/2008 20 (83%) 16.1 7.9 170 4/16/2008 19 (79%) 15 6.3 134.7 4/17/2008 22 (92%) 11 2.8 147.7 4/18/2008 15 (63%) 8.9 4.7 176 4/19/2008 17 (71 %) 11 7 184.7 4/20/2008 20 (83%) 17.9 9.9 156.5 4/21/2008 16 (67%) 11 4.3 133.1 4/22/2008 13 (54%) 14.1 8.8 34.6 4/23/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 7.9 32.8 4/24/2008 13 (54%) 6.9 3 101.5 4/25/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 4.1 183.8 4/26/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 _ 6.7 215.6 4/27/2008 15 (63%) 13 3.7 52 4/28/2008 17 (71 %) 11 8.4 191.2 4/29/2008 18 (75%) 13 5.7 215.6 4/30/2008 16 (67%) 8.9 3 201.9 5/l/2008 16 (67%) 14.1 6.2 133.1 5/2/2008 17 (71 %) 15 9 204.7 5/3/2008 20 (83%) 16.1 9.2 198.5 5/4/2008 20 (83%) 11 5.4 165.5 5/5/2008 20 (83%) 13 5.6 41.5 5/6/2008 18 (75%) 8.1 3.7 113.3 5/7/2008 19 (79%) 13 6.5 174.7 5/8/2008 17 (71 %) 14.1 8.8 202.4 5/9/2008 15 (63%) 15 9.4 183.3 5/10/2008 8 (33%) 16.1 8.4 146.3 5/11/2008 13 (54%) 17 7.9 108.5 5/12/2008 11 (46%) 16.1 10.5 301.8 5/13/2008 21 (88%) 21 9 200 5/14/2008 22 (92%) 11 4.6 161.4 5/15/2008 16 (67%) 16.1 6.7 180.6 5/16/2008 17 (71 %) 17 8.3 235.3 5/17/2008 19 (79%) 14.1 7.2 245.8 5/18/2008 24 (100%) 21.9 11.2 224.6 5/19/2008 14 (58%) 15 7.2 197.1 5/20/2008 16 (67%) 21 10.2 156.9 5/21/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 3.4 131.6 5/22/2008 19 (79%) 13 4.1 139.5 _- 5/23/2008 12 (50%) 6.9 2.2 55 5/24/2008 14 (58%) 8.9 3.6 145 5/25/2008 14 (58%) 6.9 2.6 128.6 5/26/2008 21 (88%) 14.1 6.5 162.4 5/27/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 8.8 207.8 5/28/2008 17 (71 %) 14.1 7.3 95.3 5/29/2008 12 (50%) 8.1 4.1 70.8 5/30/2008 1 (4%) 6.9 6.9 150 5/31/2008 9 (38%) 14.1 10.5 200 6/l/2008 20 (83%) 10.1 5.7 206.5 6/2/2008 20 (83%) 11 5.5 173.5 6/3/2008 16 (67%) 10.1 5.7 126.9 6/4/2008 20 (83%) 16.1 10.5 212 6/5/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 7 187.3 - 6/6/2008 17(71%) 15 4.9 166.5 -, 6/7/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 5.6 224.8 6/8/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 5.6 210 6/9/2008 21 (88%) 10.1 3.7 176.2 6/10/2008 21 (88%) 8.9 6.5 207.1 6/11/2008 20 (83%) 10.1 5.4 122.5 6/12/2008 21 (88%) 8.9 4.2 99.5 - 6/13/2008 18 (75%) 11 3.4 68.3 6/14/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 4.7 130.5 6/15/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 4.4 179.1 6/16/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 5.9 177.4 6/17/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 6.1 249.1 6/18/2008 23 (96%) 11 4.8 155.2 6/19/2008 20 (83%) 14.1 4.3 175.5 6/20/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 3.5 152.7 6/21/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 3.7 57.4 6/22/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 5.8 152.6 6/23/2008 24 (100%) 13 5.5 147.5 6/24/2008 19 79% ( ) 8.9 3.5 132.1 6/25/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 3.7 114.2 6/26/2008 22 (92%) 17 9.8 215.5 6/27/2008 16 (67%) 16.1 9.5 218.8 6/28/2008 18 (75%) 15 10.2 208.3 6/29/2008 16 (67%) 16.1 10 206.3 6/30/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 7.3 189.4 7/l/2008 21 (88%) 11 4 146.7 .7/2/2008 22 (92%) 13 4.6 154.5 7/3/2008 21 (88%) 11 6.2 160 7/4/2008 23 (96%) 14.1 8.1 204.8 7/5/2008 20 (83%) 11 6.1 146.5 7/6/2008 22 (92%) 16.1 7 164.1 7/7/2008 21 (88%) 13 7 192.4 7/8/2008 19 (79%) 17.9 7.5 193.2 7/9/2008 14 (58%) 8.9 6.3 192.9 7/10/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 5.6 203.9 7/11/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 3.6 81.1 7/12/2008 20 (83%) 13 5.7 29.5 _ 7/13/2008 18 (75%) 8.1 3.7 112.8 _ 7/14/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 5 194.2 7/15/2008 20 (83%) 10.1 5.2 120.5 7/16/2008 19 (79%) 14.1 5.5 166.3 7/17/2008 21 (88%) 10.4 5.1 99 7/18/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 4.8 63.3 7/19/2008 17 (71 %) 14.1 2.9 48.8 7/20/2008 19 (79%) 14.1 7.7 38.4 7/21/2008 18 (75%) 8.1 4.3 210 7/22/2008 14 (58%) 15 4.3 102.1 7/23/2008 16 (67%) 11 3.5 107.5 -- 7/24/2008 20 (83%) 6 1.8 103.5 7/25/2008 22 (92%) 8.1 2.5 73.6 7/26/2008 20 (83%) 8.9 2.6 97 7/27/2008 20 (83%) 14.1 5.4 168.5 _ 7/28/2008 20 (83%) 6.9 2.4 147.5 7/29/2008 19 (79%) 11 5 151.1 7/30/2008 22 (92%) 13 7.2 210.9 7/31/2008 20 (83%) 8.9 5.4 192 8/l/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 3.3 191.9 8/2/2008 21 (88%) 17 6.8 178.1 8/3/2008 22 (92%) 8.1 3.4 202.3 8/4/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 2.7 109.6 8/5/2008 21 (88%) 6 2.6 149.5 8/6/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 2.9 137.9 8/7/2008 19 (79%) 8.1 3.7 175.8 8/8/2008 19 (79%) 8.1 3.7 190 8/9/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 4.6 84.2 8/10/2008 23 (96%) 11 4.9 163.9 8/11/2008 21 (88%) 8.9 4 168.1 8/12/2008 24 (100%) 6 2.4 94.6 8/13/2008 20 (83%) 6.9 2.1 64 8/14/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 2.9 99.5 8/15/2008 20 (83%) 10.1 2.1 . 68.5 8/16/2008 22 (92%) 6 2 92.7 8/17/2008 22 (92%) 8.1 2.4 51.8 8/18/2008 19 (79%) 11 3.5 50.5 8/19/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 3 103.3 8/20/2008 21 (88%) 13 4.4 43.8 8/21/2008 22 (92%) 13 6.1 46.4 8/22/2008 22 (92%) 14.1 6.5 50 8/23/2008 18 (75%) 13 6.7 60.6 8/24/2008 22 (92%) 6.9 2.6 45.9 8/25/2008 18 (75%) 8.1 3.1 125 8/26/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 4 45.3 8/27/2008 19 (79%) 10.1 6.8 85.8 8/28/2008 20 (83%) 8.1 3.4 80 -- 8/29/2008 22 (92%) 6.9 1.4 48.2 8/30/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 2.3 118.2 _ 8/31/2008 21 (88%) 11 5 52.4 9/1/2008 21 (88%) 13 4.8 36.7 9/2/2008 23 (96%) 8.1 1.6 103 9/3/2008 22 (92%) 8.1 2.8 119.5 9/4/2008 20 (83%) 11 3.5 99.5 9/5/2008 22 (92%) 17 6.4 60.9 9/6/2008 24 (100%) 29.1 15.9 187.9 9/7/2008 20 (83%) 6.9 1.2 71.5 9/8/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 3.6 51.4 9/9/2008 23 (96%) 8.9 3.3 127 9/10/2008 21 (88%) 6.9 2.3 61.4 9/11/2008 24 (100%) 10.1 4.5 53.8 9/12/2008 21 (88%) 6 1.3 52.9 9/13/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 4.3 181.4 9/14/2008 22 (92%) 14.1 7.2 186.8 9/15/2608 21 (88%) 8.9 6 249.5 _ 9/16/2008 19 (79%) 15 5.8 106.3 9/17/2008 21 (88%) 10.1 5.5 130.5 9/18/2008 19 (79%) 13 5.9 156.3 9/19/2008 22 (92%) 17 10.7 41.8 9/20/2008 24 (100%) 11 8.1 256.3 9/21/2008 23 (96%) 8.9 3.8 79.6 9/22/2008 23 (96%) 13 7.5 107 9/23/2008 22 (92%) 19.9 12.3 49.5 9/24/2008 18 (75%) 23 14.9 90.6 9/25/2008 20 (83%) 21.9 16.3 72.5 9/26/2008 21 (88%) 11 6 88.1 9/27/2008 19 (79%) 6 1.5 58.9 9/28/2008 21 (88%) 6.9 2.6 135.2 9/29/2008 20 (83%) 6.9 2.8 114.5 9/30/2008 23 (96%) 8.1 2.8 73.9 10/l/2008 22 (92%) 8.1 1.5 90.5 10/2/2008 18 (75%) 8.9 3.7 196.1 10/3/2008 18 (75%) 6.9 1.9 77.8 10/4/2008 20 (83%) 6 1.3 62.5 10/5/2008 18 (75%) 4.9 0.7 21.7 10/6/2008 22 (92%) 11 2.7 93.2 10/7/2008 21 (88%) 11 4.4 54.8 10/8/2008 14 (58%) 4.9 0.4 11.4 _ 10/9/2008 19 (79%) 8.9 0.8 14.7 10/16/2008 19 (79%) 13 6.3 42.1 10/11/2008 18 (75%) 15 10 38.9 10/12/2008 20 (83%) 15 8.7 42 10/13/2008 17 (71 %) 6 1.6 87.1 10/14/2008 15 (63%) 4.9 0.7 47.3 10/15/2008 15 (63%) 6 0.7 22 10/16/2008 18 (75%) 13 3 104.4 10/17/2008 18 (75%) 11 5.3 45.6 10/18/2008 18 (75%) 17 9.6 351.1 10/19/2008 17 (71 %) 17 8.9 246.5 10/20/2008 22 (92%) 6.9 2 134.1 10/21/2008 21 (88%) 13 5.3 215.7 10/22/2008 19 (79%) 17 5.8 173.7 10/23/2008 19 (79%) 13 7.7 82.6 10/24/2008 18 (75%) 15 6.8 61.7 10/25/2008 21 (88%) 17 8.4 179.5 10/26/2008 21 (88%) 6 1.4 70 10/27/2008 21 (88%) 19.9 6 201 10/28/2008 20 (83%) 16.1 8.7 264.5 10/29/2008 22 (92%) 17.9 7.2 182.3 10/30/2008 18 (75%) 15 4.2 152.2 10/31/2008 21 (88%) 6 1.2 85.2 11/1/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 1.9 74.8 11/2/2008 23 (96%) 8.1 3.6 43.5 11/3/2008 24 (100%) 14.1 9.2 32.9 11/4/2008 21 (88%) 15 10.1 45.7 -- 11/5/2008 18 (75%) 17 11.6 339.4 11/6/2008 23 (96%) 14.1 6.5 267 11/7/2008 21 (88%) 6 1.9 108.1 11/8/2008 23 (96%) 13 6 196.1 _ 11/9/2008 21 (88%) 10.1 1.9 58.1 11/10/2008 24 (100%) 8.1 1.9 100 11/11/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 3.6 68.6 11/12/2008 19 (79%) 6.9 3.6 66.3 11/13/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 4.8 103.6 11/14/2008 19 (79%) 6 1.7 47.9 11/15/2008 24 (100%) 29.1 11.5 205.4 11/16/2008 22 (92%) 13 5.7 190.9 _- 11/17/2008 23 (96%) 6 1.7 110.4 11/18/2008 18 (75%) 16.1 6.4 286.1 11/19/2008 20 (83%) 18.4 5.5 235 11/20/2008 16 (67%) 13.8 6.3 249.4 11/21/2008 16 (67%) 15 6.8 295.6 11/22/2008 13 (54%) 8.1 2.8 138.5 11/23/2008 10 (42%) 8.1 1.8 79 11 /24/2008 5 (21 %) 9.2 2.8 70 11/25/2008 10 (42%) 16.1 7.1 249 11/26/2008 13 (54%) 8.1 2.8 118.5 11/27/2008 14 (58%) 8.1 1.6 56.4 -' 11/28/2008 18 (75%) 6.9 2.9 137.2 11/29/2008 21 (88%) 11.5 5 34.8 11/30/2008 18 (75%) 12.7 2.9 67.8 12/1/2008 23(96%) 25.1 13.2 227.8 12/2/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 3.5 135.2 12/3/2008 22 (92%) 4.9 1.6 72.7 12/4/2008 24 (100%) 15 4.9 132.9 12/5/2008 17 (71 %) 11 3.1 69.4 12/6/2008 21 (88%) 8.1 2.6 84.8 12/7/2008 22 (92%) 16.1 5.8 188.6 12/8/2008 20 (83%) 6 1 40.5 12/9/2008 16 (67%) 10.1 5.6 113.8 12/10/2008 20 (83%) 11 7 169 12/11/2008 20 (83%) 16.1 8.2 140.5 12/12/2008 20 (83%) 17.9 9.5 269 12/13/2008 22 (92%) 8.9 3.5 190.9 12/14/2008 23 (96%) 10.1 5.4 89.1 12/15/2008 22 (92%) 11 6.8 153.6 12/16/2008 18 (75%) 14.1 4.8 68.9 12/17/2008 22 (92%) 13 2 63.2 12/18/2008 22 (92%) 10.1 3.7 60.5 12/19/2008 21 (88%) 15 7.5 151.9 12/20/2008 18 (75%) 10.1 7.3 168.3 12/21/2008 20 (83%) 17.9 7.8 226.5 12/22/2008 22 (92%) 16.1 8.5 249.1 12/23/2008 17 (71 %) 6 1.9 51.8 12/24/2008 20 (83%) 14.1 6.8 133.5 12/25/2008 19 (79%) 16.1 6.7 165.3 12/26/2008 21 (88%) 8.9 4.6 31.9 12/27/2008 22 (92%) 4.9 0.2 6.8 12/28/2008 3 (13%) 6 3.7 130 12/29/2008 missing missing missing missing 12/30/2008 missing missing missing missing 12/31/2008 5 (21%) 12.7 10.1 322 1/l/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 3.5 140 1/2/2009 23 (96%) 10.4 4 157 1/312009 22 (92%) 5.8 1.5 50.9 1/4/2009 23 (96%) 6.9 1.9 101.3 1/5/2009 21 (88%) 11.5 5.7 197.1 1/6/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 4.1 70.5 1/7/2009 19 (79%) 26.5 16.3 215.3 1/8/2009 20 (83%) 15 9.1 253.5 1/9/2009 21 (88%) 6.9 3.5 181.4 1/10/2009 18 (75%) 15 8.1 152.2 1/11/2009 20 (83%) 13,8 9 175 1/12/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 4.7 101.6 1/13/2009 13 (54%) 8.1 4.7 188.5 1/14/2009 20 (83%) 6,9 2.9 163 1/15/2009 20 (83%) 11.5 7 250.5 1/16/2009 22 (92%) 12.7 5.7 295.5 1/17/2009 21 (88%) 5.8 2.7 92.4 1/18/2009 21 (88%) 9.2 5.3 191 1/19/2009 21 (88%) 10.4 3.2 119.5 1/20/2009 22 (92%) 16.1 7.8 167.3 1/21/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 3 151.9 1/22/2009 24 (100%) 10.4 5.3 182.1 1/23/2009 20 (83%) 12.7 6.3 202 1/24/2009 20 (83%) 10.4 6 178.5 1/25/2009 23 (96%) 9.2 6.6 30.9 1/26/2009 20 (83%) 6.9 3.8 63 1/27/2009 20 (83%) 5.8 3.5 67 1/28/2009 19 (79%) 23 8.4 147.4 1/29/2009 14 (58%) 8.1 3.1 103.6 1130/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 2.8 157.9 1/31/2009 22 (92%) 13.8 5 151.8 2/l/2009 22 (92%) 19.6 8.6 209.5 2/2/2009 19 (79%) 12.7 5.1 177.4 2/3/2009 15 (63%) 13.8 8.2 267.3 2/4/2009 23 (96%) 17.3 8.3 274.8 2/5/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 5.7 224.3 2/6/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 3.8 110.9 2/7/2009 21 (88%) 10.4 6.3 183.3 2/8/2009 23 (96%) 13.8 7.6 201.3 2/9/2009 20 (83%) 10.4 4.8 100.5 2/10/2009 15 (63%) 13.8 5.4 126 2/11/2009 19 (79%) 21.9 10.9 144.7 2/12/2009 20 (83%) 24.2 14.8 258.5 2/13/2009 20 (83%) 11.5 5.6 203 2/14/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 4.7 149.1 2/15/2009 22 (92%) 13.8 7.2 91.8 2/16/2009 21 (88%) 15 8.1 258.6 2/17/2009 21 (88%) 6.9 2.7 172.9 2/18/2009 17 (71 %) 16.1 8.3 182.9 2/19/2009 21 (88%) 15 9.5 250 2/20/2009 22 (92%) 12.7 6 202.7 2/21/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 3.7 94.8 2/22/2009 20 (83%) 20.7 9.1 246.5 2/23/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 6 278.6 2/24/2009 24 (100%) 13.8 4.3 236.7 2/25/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 2.5 62.3 2/26/2009 22 (92%) 9.2 2.1 80.9 2/27/2009 19 (79%) 15 8.2 162.6 2/28/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 6.5 85.7 _ 3/1/2009 22 (92%) 16.1 8.7 159.1 3/2/2009 21 (88%) 20.7 9.6. 212.4 3/3/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 7 242.4 3/4/2009 19 (79%) 4.6 1.2 67.9 3/5/2009 17 (71 %) 11.5 4.5 128.2 3/6/2009 23 (96%) 21.9 10.1 192.6 3/7/2009 19 (79%) 11.5 7.3 211.6 3/8/2009 22 (92%) 18.4 11 221.4 3/9/2009 22 (92%) 16.1 9.3 191.8 3/10/2009 22 (92%) 12.7 7.3 93.2 3/11/2009 18 (75%) 15 7.4 192.8 3/12/2009 21 (88%) 15 9.8 106.2 3/13/2009 18 (75%) 11.5 8.5 125 3/14/2009 21 (88%) 10.4 6 62.9 3/15/2009 17 (71 %) 5.8 1 50.6 3/16/2009 19 (79%) 6.9 2 28.9 3/17/2009 22 (92%) 13.8 7.1 195.5 3/18/2009 22 (92%) 6.9 1.5 45 3/19/2009 16 (67%) 12.7 4.6 3/20/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 8.4 171.9 3/21/2009 15(63%) 11.5 4.9 102 3/22/2009 22 (92%) 6.9 2 85.5 3/23/2009 19 (79%) 12.7 4.1 84.7 3/24/2009 21 (88%) 11.5 6.5 54.3 3/25/2009 20 (83%) 8.1 4.1 67 3/26/2009 19 (79%) 11.5 6 140.5 3/27/2009 21 (88%) 9.2 3.4 110 3/28/2009 19 (79%) 17.3 4.5 117.9 3/29/2009 18 (75%) 28.8 13.9 222.8 3/30/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 7.1 216.2 3/31/2009 22 (92%) 10.4 5.2 95.5 4/l/2009 23 (96%) 9.2 3.4 66.5 4/2/2009 23 (96%) 11.5 3.3 63 4/3/2009 22 (92%) 27.6 14.2 229.1 4/4/2009 21 (88%) 17.3 8.1 223.3 4/5/2009 20 (83%) 11.5 5.8 102 4/6/2009 22 (92%) 17.3 10.3 232.3 4/7/2009 23 (96%) 16.1 9.2 269.1 4/8/2009 18 (75%) 15 7.6 212.2 _ 4/9/2009 16 (67%) 11.5 5.5 184.4 4/10/2009 .18 (75%) 20.7 10 181.1 4/11/2009 20 (83%) 16.1 10 266 4/12/2009 23 (96%) 13.8 4.5 101.7 4/13/2009 24 (100%) 12.7 4.6 69.6 4/14/2009 23 (96%) 12.7 4.3 124.3 4/15/2009 23 (96%) 13.8 8.3 290.9 4/16/2009 13 (54%) 20.7 12.1 200.8 4/17/2009 22 (92%) 6.9 3 163.2 4/18/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 7.5 232.4 4/19/2009 20 (83%) 10.4 5.6 175.5 4/20/2009 20 (83%) 18.4 9.1 175 4/21/2009 20 (83%) 16.1 6.1 147 _ 4/22/2009 19 (79%) 24.2 9.1 177.4 4/23/2009 20 (83%) 13.8 6.9 211 4/24/2009 19 (79%) 9.2 5.3 126.8 4/25/2009 20 (83%) 12.7 8.7 200.5 4/26/2009 19 (79%) 11.5 6.8 221.1 4/27/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 4.2 144.7 4/28/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 5.6 167.6 4/29/2009 18 (75%) 11.5 6.5 142.8 4/30/2009 20 (83%) 6.9 3.3 57.5 5/l/2009 18 (75%) 13.8 6.3 150.6 5/2/2009 22 (92%) 19.6 9.8 209.5 - 5/3/2009 23 (96%) 16.1 9.8 203.9 5/4/2009 19 (79%) 19.6 11.3 200 5/5/2009 20 (83%) 9.2 4.8 109 5/6/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 8.3 182.9 5/7/2009 24 (100%) 16.1 9.7 207.1 5/8/2009 17 (71 %) 12.7 6.6 180 5/9/2009 16 (67%) 19.6 11.3 229.4 5/10/2009 17 (71 %) 10.4 3.5 152.9 5/11/2009 18 (75%) 12.7. 5.1 41.1 5/12/2009 19 (79%) 8.1 4.5 146.3 5/13/2009 19 (79%) 12.7 6 80 _ 5/14/2009 21 (88%) 13.8 7.1 111 5/15/2009 23 (96%) 12.7 6.5 104.3 5/16/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 4.4 149 5/17/2009 20 (83%) 15 9.1 217 5/18/2009 19 (79%) 19.6 10.8 27.4 5/19/2009 21 (88%) 16.1 8.9 81 87.7 5/20/2009 22 (92%) 12.7 8.5 48.9 5/21/2009 18 (75%) 12.7 3.8 93.8 5/22/2009 21 (88%) 11.5 4.5 87 5/23/2009 23 (96%) 10.4 3.7 107.1 5/24/2009 21 (88%) 9.2 3.8 4.1 98.2 5/25/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 69 5/26/2009 21 (88%) 11.5 4.5 69 5/27/2009 20 (83%) 9.2 4 5.1 167.6 5/28/2009 21 (88%) 10.4 7.2 187.7 5/29/2009 22 (92%) 15 3 157.6 5/30/2009 21 (88%) 6.9 5.2 159.5 5/31/2009 19 (79%) 12.7 6.8 96.1 6/1/2009 18 (75%) 11.5 6.3 182.2 _ 6/2/2009 23 (96%) 11.5 7.7 203.2 6/3/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 6.9 178.3 6/4/2009 23 (96%) 10.4 187 6/5/2009 23 (96%) 16.1 8.8 6/6/2009 20 (83%) 6.9 2.6 25.5 6/7/2009 19 (79%) 6.9 2.9 59.5 6/8/2009 18 (75%) 8.1 3.1 110.6 6/9/2009 16 (67%) 10.4 3.6 83.1 6/10/2009 16 (67%) 5.8 3.5 108.8 6/11/2009 16 (67%) 10.4 5.4 148.8 6/12/2009 16 (67%) 10.4 6.1 178.1 6/13/2009 11 (46%) 8.1 2.4 70 6114/2009 21 (88%) 9.2 3.7 92.9 6/15/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 3.9 60.5 6/16/2009 22 (92%) 9.2 5.3 58.2 6/17/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 7.6 94.8 6/18/2009 20 (83%) 9.2 5.9 165 189.4 6/19/2009 17(71%) 9.2 5.2 183.5 6/20/2009 17 (71 %) 13.8 5.6 6/21/2009 18 (75%) 17.3 6.5 175.6 6/22/2009 16 (67%) 13.8 7.2 269.4 6/23/2009 15 (63%) 6.9 4 150 6/24/2009 13 (54%) 9.2 3.7 174.6 6/26/2009 12 (50%) 6.9 2.5 125.8 ' 6/26/2009 13 (54%) 10.4 6.6 208.5 6/27/2009 12 (50%) 10.4 5.1 89•2 6/28/2009 11 (46%) 5.8 1.6 82.7 6/29/2009 15 (63%) 6.9 2.8 143.3 6/30/2009 15 (63%) 12.7 3.6 108.7 7/1/2009 19 (79%) 12.7 5.8 182.1 7/2/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 2.2 79.5 7/3/2009 16 (67%) 9.2 4.3 165.6 7/4/2009 13 (54%) 8.1 2.9 133.8 7/5/2009 15 (63%) 6.9 2.3 106.7 7/6/2009 20 (83%) 10.4 2.7 65.5 7/7/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 2.8 76.4 7/8/2009 14 (58%) 6.9 1.9 87.1 _ 7/9/2009 15 (63%) 12.7 5.4 37.3 - 7/10/2009 20 (83%) 10.4 4.3 25 7/11/2009 19 (79%) 11.5 4.3 121.1 7/12/2009 18 (75%) 11.5 7.2 200 7/13/2009 18 (75%) 12.7 2.7 95 7/14/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 3.2 46.4 7/15/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 2.2 91.4 7/16/2009 13 (54%) 12.7 7.1 203.8 _ 7/17/2009 17(71%) 11.5 4.5 ' 117.1 7/18/2009 15 (63%) 5.8 1.7 84.7 7/19/2009 17 (71 %) 6.9 4 88.8 7/20/2009 16 (67%) 6.9 2.1 31.3 7/21/2009 19 (79%) 6.9 2 56.8 7/22/2009 18 (75%) 10.4 3.6 65.6 - 7/23/2009 20 (83%) 5.8 2.3 122 7/24/2009 16 (67%) 10.4 5 170 - 7/25/2009 18 (75%) 9.2 3.5 81.7 7/26/2009 23 (96%) 13.8 6.7 144.8 7/27/2009 22 (92%) 17.3 6.9 190.5 7/28/2009 18 (75%) 12.7 6.2 176.1 7/29/2009 16 (67%) 13.8 8.4 193.8 _ 7/30/2009 16 (67%) 13.8 8.5 214.4 -. 7/31/2009 16 (67%) 16.1 9.3 196.9 8/l/2009 19 (79%) 6.9 4.3 203.2 8/2/2009 18 (75%) 10.4 5.3 172.8 8/3/2009 19 (79%) 9.2 2.7. 105.8 8/4/2009 16 (67%) 10.4 4.1 113.8 8/5/2009 18 (75%) 12.7 6.6 182.2 8/6/2009 21 (88%) 11.5 4.7 184.3 8/7/2009 19 (79%) 5.8 2.2 129.5 _ - 8/8/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 3.3 112.9 8/9/2009 16 (67%) 12.7 7.4 225.6 8/10/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 6.2 206.8 8/11/2009 18 (75%) 11.5 6 218.3 8/12/2009 19 (79%) 15 2.2 66.3 8/13/2009 14 (58%) 4.6 0.3 25 8/14/2009 23 (96%) 9.2 2.4 43 8/15/2009. 19 (79%) 6.9 3.3 179.5 8/16/2009 16 (67%) 4.6 1.6 82.5 8/17/2009 17 (71 %) 6.9 2 83.5 8/18/2009 15 (63%) 10.4 6.1 193.3 8/19/2009 20 (83%) 11.5 6.9 209.5 8/20/2009 20 (83%) 12.7 7.9 197 8/21/2009 15 (63%) 12.7 7.1 185.3 8/22/2009 19 (79%) 17.3 3.3 119.5 8/23/2009 20 (83%) 5.8 2.2 78.5 8/24/2009 24 (100%) 5.8 1.8 105.8 8/25/2009 19 (79%) 5.8 3.4 84.7 -, 8/26/2009 15 (63%) 5.8 2 108.7 8/27/2009 17 (71 %) 8.1 3.7 176.5 - 8/28/2009 22 (92%) 15 5 56.4 8/29/2009 21 (88%) 9.2 5.5 231.4 _ 8/30/2009 17 (71 %) 6.9 3.7 158.2 8/31/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 4 25.8 9/l/2009 17(71%) 13.8 8.1 238.2 _ 9/2/2009 24 (100%) 15 9 175.8 9/3/2009 17 (71 %) 16.1 8.9 275.9 9/4/2009 20 (83%) 8.1 2.5 151 9/5/2009 22 (92%) 8.1 2.1 32.3 9/6/2009 24 (100%) 13.8 6.5 42.5 9/7/2009 19 (79%) 10.4 6 45.3 9/8/2009 23 (96%) 16.1 9.3 290 9/9/2009 23 (96%) 11.5 5.5 174.3 9/10/2009 24 (100%) 15 8.9 275 9/11/2009 18 (75%) 6.9 3.3 188.3 9/12/2009 24 (100%) 6.9 2.8 145.8 9/13/2009 23 (96%) 9.2 3.7 168.3 9/14/2009 23 (96%) 10.4 2.6 113.9 9/15/2009 19 (79%) 6.9 2.4 94.7 9/16/2009 21 (88%) 10.4 2 50 9/17/2009 21 (88%) 6.9 4.5 152.4 9/18/2009 22 (92%) 4.6 1.3 27.3 9/19/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 5.3 33.3 9/20/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 4.7 39.5 9/21/2009 22 (92%) 9.2 4.7 59.1 9/22/2009 20 (83%) 9.2 4.9 57 9/23/2009 20 (83%) 9.2 1.8 60.5 9/24/2009 22 (92%) 6.9 2.6 123.2 _ 9/25/2009 22 (92%) 17.3 6.2 107.7 - 9/26/2009 24 (100%) 10.4 7.1 68.8 9/27/2009 _ 22 (92%) 10.4 4.7 168.6 9/28/2009 24 (100%) 15 6.1 138.8 9/29/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 4.2 158.6 9/30/2009 21 (88%) 8.1 1.9 104.3 10/l/2009 21 (88%) 6.9 0.5 26.7 10/2/2009 24 (100%) 8.1 2.1 58.3 10/3/2009 24 (100%) 9.2 2.7 101.3 10/4/2009 23 (96%) 9.2 2.9 162.2 10/5/2009 28 (117%) 9.2 0.9 38.9 10/6/2009 25 (104%) 8.1 2.7 48.8 10/7/2009 19 (79%) 15 7.9 207.9 _ 10/8/2009 22 (92%) 10.4 2.6 57.3 10/9/2009 17(71%) 15 7.4 152.4 10/10/2009 23 (96%) 15 6.7 155.2 10/11/2009 24 (100%) 10.4 4.1 82.5 10/12/2009 21 (88%) 16.1 4.3 164.8 10/13/2009 19 (79%) 9.2 3.9 223.2 10/14/2009 23 (96%) 8.1 5.7 41.7 10/15/2009 25 (104%) 10.4 5.8 305.6 10/16/2009 22 (92%) 11.5 6.4 291.8 10/17/2009 23 (96%) 11.5 8.2 308.7 10/18/2009 23 (96%) 15 8.6 328.7 10/19/2009 23 (96%) 12.7 5.4 233 10/20/2009 23 (96%) 5.8 1.6 79.6 10/21/2009 22 (92%) 5.8 1.7 67.7 10/22/2009 22 (92%) 9.2 2.7 104.1 10/23/2009 20 (83%) 15 4.8 99.5 10/24/2009 24 (100%) 16.1 8 180.4 10/25/2009 20 (83%) 11.5 6.9 126.5 10/26/2009 17 (71%) 12.7 8.6 27.1 10/27/2009 23 (96%) 6.9 2.8 140.9 10/28/2009 20 (83%) 16.1 6.3 150.5 10/29/2009 24 (100%) 10.4 4.8 69.6 10/30/2009 22 (92%) 6.9 3.2 78.2 10/31/2009 21 (88%) 12.7 5.6 140.7 View of connection to Taylor Creek in SW corner of pond/basin. Upper end of existing ditch to be filled to enhance water quality. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK LOG AND EXISTING DITCH PROJECT: ew wam ono mm" sir APPLICANT: wa WAIM vmuvm 1/2010 Report to DWQ Supplemental to CAMA Major jLcC Existing earthen berm with dirt road at western edge of pond/basin. Could be removed to enhance connection to Taylor Creek. View of earthern berm with dirt road on western side of basin. At pond/basin, looking west. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS EXISTING BERM BETWEEN TAYLDR CREEK AND BAY LAKES POND/BASIN PROJECT: My LWES, CNOCdMNNY eAY APPLICANT: m wMNEN wNICWxo /2010 Report to DWO Supplemental to CAMA Major Existing surface water connection to Chocowinity Bay, wind tide flooded area (area of proposed navigation channel). On property, facing Chocowinity Bay. Epp M1 t Existing surface water connection to Chocowinity Bay, wind tide flooded area (area of proposed navigation channel). On property, facing Chocowinity Bay. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT: ekr was, c"ocomrmr sia APPUCANT: WL wARF04 WOMM EXISTING SURFACE WATER EXCHANGE 2 2010 Report to DWO p WITH CHOCOWINITY BAY Supplemental to CAMA Major application Existing connection to Taylor Creek, view from the Bay Lakes pond/basin. Water exchange between Taylor Creek and Bay Lakes pond/basin at existing connection to Taylor Creek. PROJECT: ear was, cxOMN" ear SITE PHOTOGRAPHS I APPLICANT: „p WAM04 W„a„M EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK I. , Supplemental to CAMA Major View of existing connection to Taylor Creek, facing N to NW. Taylor Creek to left of rip rap, Bay Lakes pond/basin to the right. View of existing connection to Taylor Creek, rip rap per DCM requirements, two submerged culverts under rip rap. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK PROJECT: air Lws. cnocan ear APPLICANT: wlt w� w Oww /2010 Report to DWO Supplemental to CAMA Major i ff or On -site Tide Gauge, Chocowinity Bay (located at dock in existing open water canal) On -site Tide Gauge, Bay Lakes (placed at dock in background on the eastern side of the existing pond/basin area) PROJECT: BAY was, aHOCOMWTY SAY SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPLICANT: uR waneH wHc ON —SITE TIDE GAUGES 2 2010 Report to DWQ L G Supplemental to CAMA Major applicatio Water flowing in to lake from Taylor Creek at very high tide over lake culvert and rip -rap fill into lake ' South/West t a y �• i E,y(. • i _ ♦ i�iw, try. ,It. , SITE PHOTOGRAPHS EXISTING CONNECTION TO RODMAN CREEK PROJECT: air was, ammm ea APPUCANT: MFL MAMM wPCKW to LAMA Major F Ditch view culvert from canal system under Whichard's Beach Rd. Ditch view culvert from canal system and culvert under Whichard's Beach Rd. North/Fast g ♦F� . !k 1 F C •«w— SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT: eA.LAw.owo"e,. EXISTING CONNECTION TO RODMAN CREEK APPLICANT: M WNREN wwauw CULVERT WHICHARDS BEACH ROAD 2 2010 Report to ON II Supplemental to CAMA Major application Longnose Gar found on bank 9/2009 (Lepisosteus osseus) y -OIL ... Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) �-�- SITE PHOTOGRAPHS FISH POPULATION STUDY LOG 10/30/2009 PROJECT: w wm mocomm ein APPLICANT: W wAFhVN wH /2010 Report to DW0 ipplemental to CAMA Major application 10/30/2009