12-14 Whichard, Warren Application Book

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
February 23, 2010
Mr. Roberto Schiller
NC Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Al Hodge
NC Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Bay Lakes CAMA Major Permit application
Dear Messrs. Schiller and Hodge,
# RECEIVED
MAR 9 201Q;
Morehead cny DCM
The applicant for the above -referenced CAMA permit application has provided me with a copy of the
DWQ's 1/28/2010 letter regarding the associated application for a 401 Water Quality Certification. I am
also in receipt of the DWQ's letter dated 11/25/2009 that followed our 10/22/2009 meeting at the
Washington DENR office. This letter and the enclosed report provide a response to those 11/25/2009
and 1/28/2010 letters, and specifically provides information regarding the request for hydrodynamic
modeling.
In our 10/22/2009 meeting, we discussed some of the information provided in the enclosed report. We
discussed specifics of the ambient water quality sampling, existing connections to adjacent waterbodies,
and measures to maintain good water quality. It was my understanding that the DWQ would review the
information provided in the meeting, provide a letter with any additional information needed to make a
decision regarding use of the data in lieu of hydrodynamic modeling, LMG would resubmit any additional
information requested, and the DWQ would make a final review of the information and provide a
decision.
The 11/25/2009 DWQ letter requests some additional information, for which a response is provided in the
enclosed report. However, the letter also appears to make a conclusion regarding the need for
hydrodynamic modeling. On behalf of the applicant, I would like to request that DWQ please consider all
of the information provided in the enclosed report before making a final decision on the need for
hydrodynamic modeling.
This letter and enclosed report is intended to follow up on discussions at the 10/22/2009 meeting and the
DWQ's following 11/25/2009 letter. I have signed notification forms and/or certified mail receipts from
notifications sent to all existing Bay Lakes property owners regarding riparian buffer requirements. I will
forward that information in a separate package, along with information requested regarding avoidance
and minimization of wetland impacts.

Supplement to 401 Water Quality Certification application
through the NC CAMA Major Permit application process
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
DWQ Project # 09-0757
Documentation of Existing Connectivity and
Satisfaction of NC DENR Water Quality Standards
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
February 4, 2010
Prepared for:
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC, 27889
Prepared by:
Land Management Group, Inc.
P. O. Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
On behalf of:
Mr. Warren Whichard, applicant

I. Purpose.
This report is a supplement to the NC CAMA Major Development Permit application
submitted for the Bay Lakes property in Chocowinity, NC. As detailed in the CAMA
Permit application, the property contains man-made canals and a basin/pond area. The
property is bounded to the south by Chocowinity Bay, to the west by Taylor Creek, and
to the north by Whichard's Beach Road and Rodman Creek which abuts the northern
side of the road (see enclosed aerial). Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek and Rodman
Creek at the location of the property are all classified by the NC Environmental
Management Commission as SC/NSW. This classification indicates waters are nutrient
sensitive, tidal salt waters. Uses for this water classification are defined by 15A NCAC
0213.0101(d)(1) as "saltwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life
including propagation and survival, and wildlife". The NC Marine Fisheries Commission
designates the waters as "Inland Waters".
Surface water connections currently exist between the waters of Bay Lakes and
Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek and Rodman Creek, but none of the existing connections
are navigable. The CAMA Permit application requests to excavate a new canal which
would provide small recreational runabouts navigable access from the existing canals to
Chocowinity Bay. The purpose of this report is to provide additional information to the
NC Division of Water Quality in response to comments received during the CAMA Major
Development Permit application review process. Specifically, this report responds to
the DWQ's request for a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model. Other items of
additional information requested by DWQ are being provided in a separate letter.
It is understood that when a new upland marina basin is proposed, predictive computer
modeling is one of the few ways to demonstrate DO standards can be expected to be
met in the future basin. However, the fact that the Bay Lakes waters already exist with
connections allows the opportunity to sample conditions directly and in real time. This
report provides documentation that: (1) the Bay Lakes basin/pond and canals are
already an open system with connections to the adjacent waterbodies (2) an improved
connection is not expected to result in a loss of defined uses and (3) the waters currently
meet water quality standards defined in 15A NCAC 02B.0220(3)(b) and should continue
to meet that standard and the antidegradation policy defined in 15A NCAC 026.0201. It
is intended that this data and documentation provide adequate information with which to
assess potential impacts to water quality in lieu of an additional three-dimensional
hydrodynamic model.
II. Existing Connectivity.
The existing basin/pond (labeled "ex. waterway" on figures in the CAMA Permit
application) and canals within Bay Lakes are already an "open system' in the current
condition based on connections to several directly adjacent waterbodies. As mentioned,
the Bay Lakes system is connected to: (1) Chocowinity Bay to the south (2) Taylor Creek
to the west and (3) Rodman Creek to the north through culverts under Whichard's Beach
Road.
A connection to Taylor Creek exists along the western side of the existing basin/pond
and is labeled on the CAMA Major figure "Existing Conditions" (also see enclosed
aerial). The NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM) previously determined un-
permitted work had been done in this location and the restoration plan on record with the
DCM documents a connection. Although it is clear the connection is not permitted to be
navigable, flow between the creek and the basin was maintained. Under the direction of
-1-

DCM, two 48" culverts were placed under the normal water level with rip rap over top.
The top of the rip rap is approximately 1' to 2' below the normal water level. This
clearance was specifically requested by the resource agencies to maintain a connection
for the movement of fish between Taylor Creek and the existing basin. This connection
also inherently allows for water flow as do the two submerged 48" culverts. It is
common to see a tide coming in over this connection and several site photographs of
these events are enclosed in this report (see photographs enclosed).
A surface water connection also exists to Taylor Creek in the southern corner of the
pond/basin (see enclosed aerial). On south and southwest winds, the waters of Taylor
Creek flow across this low area and into the Bay Lakes pond/basin.
At the northern -most extent of the canal system, where connections are important for
flushing, a culvert under Whichard's Beach Road connects the most inland canal to
Rodman Creek. Photographs of both the Bay Lakes and Rodman Creek sides of the
culvert are provided in this report and small minnows are clearly visible in the
photographs (see photographs enclosed).
Surface water connections to Chocowinity Bay inherently exist. Aerial photography
- shows a fringing wetland on the southern edge of the property along Chocowinity Bay.
As defined by their fringing landscape position, these wetlands receive lateral flows from
Chocowinity Bay. A portion of the Bay Lakes shoreline along Chocowinity Bay has been
-- previously disturbed, and although vegetation is now maintained as mowed grasses
rather than the natural woody vegetation, elevations are close enough to the adjacent
wetlands that wetland criteria is met. During large wind tides, Chocowinity Bay often
floods this low-lying wetland area. In fact, waters often completely flood the low-lying
wetland area and flow into the existing pond/basin area. An existing man-made canal
now provides direct connection from the bay to the pond/basin area (see CAMA
application materials). Photographs of the ponding in this low-lying wetland area
resulting from wind tides are enclosed in this report.
Further evidence of a hydrologic connection to Chocowinity Bay is provided by tide
gauge data. LMG installed a tide gauge in the Bay Lakes basin/pond at the Whichards
existing dock (which is on the east side of the pond/basin) and in the existing open water
canal in Chocowinity Bay. Data from those gauges was compared to tide data at the
Core Creek Bridge, as obtained from Tides and Currents, NOAA, NC Station ID
8656084. Hydrographs from both the Chocowinty Bay and Bay Lakes gauges are nearly
identical and provide further evidence of the existing connectivity (Photographs of tide
gauge location and hydrographs enclosed).
Ill. Ambient Water Quality.
To assess whether creating an improved connection between the Bay Lakes
waterbodies and Chocowinity Bay can be expected to maintain the DO standard of
5mg/L (15A NCAC 02B.0220(3)(b)) and satisfy the antidegradation policy (15A NCAC
02B.0201(f)), ambient water quality sampling was done. For projects where a new
upland basin is proposed, predictive modeling is an effective tool for determining
whether such standards can be met. With the Bay Lakes canals and basin/pond already
existing, water quality conditions can be sampled directly. Data describing an existing
condition should provide a more useful and potentially more accurate description than
predictive modeling.
-2-

LMG sampled ambient water quality parameters using a YSI-85 (Yellow Springs
Instrument Co. Model 85) dissolved oxygen, conductivity, salinity, and temperature
meter. Sampling was done in the summer of 2007, early fall of 2008, and in the
summer and early fall of 2009. This time of year was specifically chosen as it represents
the season when biological oxygen demand is expected to be the highest and, as a
result, when dissolved (DO) oxygen levels are expected to be the lowest. Both the
summers of 2007 and 2009 were relatively hot and dry years (with the summer of 2007
being a drought year). The time period sampled should represent an average worse
case condition for ambient DO concentrations.
Locations of the 2007 sampling stations were based on early conversations and site
meetings with NC DENR staff. Sampling stations were placed at the head of each
existing canal where DO values were expected to be lowest. Sampling stations were
also located in Chocowinity Bay and Taylor Creeks for reference and comparison to the
connecting waterbody. Locations of the 2009 sampling stations were revised slightly
following a 6/3/2009 review of the 2007 data at the Washington DENR office with
Roberto Schiller. At that time, additional sampling in the summer of 2009 was requested
along with removal of the Taylor Creek stations from the 2009 sampling (Stations #1, #2,
and #12). Sampling stations in 2009 also included points at the head of each existing
canal and within open waters of Chocowinity Bay for reference to the connecting
waterbody. (See enclosed Sample Location Maps).
Sampling methods follow those outlined by the NC DWQ Ambient Monitoring System's
Quality Assurance Project Plan (NC AMS CAPP 2004). Field measurements at each
sampling station follow the Profile 2 (PR2) method described in that document, where
three points in the water column are sampled to capture any stratification of DO
concentrations. Three standard readings were taken: (1) a surface reading where the
probe is submerged just below the water surface, (2) a bottom reading where the probe
is placed just above the bottom surface but not on the bottom and (3) a mid point in the
water column between the top and bottom points. In cases where water depths were
approximately 3' or less, the number of points in the water column was collapsed to two
or just one if water depths were particularly shallow. This adjustment of the sampling
method is warranted in shallower depths where the likelihood of stratification is less and
where fewer points in the column can adequately describe ambient concentrations.
Sampling done on 6/11/2009 sampled two points in the water column even in depths
exceeding 3'. However, none of the sampling depths were greater than 6', and the
average of a top and bottom water column reading was thought to be a sufficient
description of the water column.
In a subsequent 10/22/2009 meeting with DWQ Washington Regional staff, information
regarding LMG's meter calibration protocols was requested. LMG staff follows all
instructions provided in the YSI 85 manual and generally uses the same protocol for
electrometric sampling methods with meters that self -temperature correct as described
in the NC DWQ Intensive Survey Unit's Standard Operating Procedures (NC DENR
2003). LMG's written protocol for calibration of the YSI 85 is provided with this report,
and the meter was calibrated in situ the morning of each sampling event. The 7/20/2009
sampling found unexpectedly high DO values, and directly after the sampling event, the
LMG meter was calibrated against meters at the University of North Carolina
Wilmington's Aquatic Ecology Laboratory. The meter was found to be accurate and that
data was retained.
-3-

Sampling occurred on: 6/14/2007, 6/29/2007, 7/20/2007, 8/27/2007, 8/10/2008,
10/1412008, 6/11/2009, 7/31/2009, 8/17/2009, 9/09/2009, and 10/29/2009. Raw data
from these sampling events was included in full as an appendix to the CAMA Major
Permit application. The DWQ's letter dated 11/25/2009, which followed our 10/22/2009
meeting, contained four specific questions regarding the data. Item #1 of that letter
related to the recorded depth at Station 4 on 8/27/2007. Field notes from that date were
reviewed and the depth has been corrected. Item #2 of that letter related to the
omission of Stations 1, 2, and 12 from the 8/10/2008 data. That sampling date has been
removed completely, and data from a more comprehensive 10/14/2008 sampling have
been included. Sampling on 10/14/2008 was done while on -site for a Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) and shellfish surrey. Item #3 of that letter related to the
omission of Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, and 14 from the 7/31/2009 data. Sampling on
7/31/2009 was done in conjunction with a meeting at the DWQ's Washington Regional
field office about the project. Sampling on that date was done in areas accessible from
the bulkhead at the upper end of each canal. Although the Chocowinity Bay stations
(Stations 3, 4, and 5) and some of the interior Bay Lakes stations (13 and 14) were not
sampled, the points sampled were located at the most landward extent of the canals.
This data was descriptive of conditions at the most landward locations and was included
towards that purpose. Item # 4 of that letter related to the omission of Stations 1, 2, 12,
and 8 from the 8/17/2009 data. Stations 1 and 2 had been removed from the regular
2009 sampling protocol per DWQ request, and Station 8 was omitted based on the fact
that Station 7 represented similar conditions in the pond/basin and that Stations 9-11
represented similar conditions at the head of canals. As requested in DWQ's
11/25/2009 letter (Item #4) data from the USGS station #0208450705 Pamlico River
Channel Light #16 was sought for correlation to the data collected on -site. Metadata
provided on the USGS's website (waterdata.usgs.gov) indicate available data from that
station ranges from 1989 to 1993, and a comparison could not be made.
Data collected on -site show that for every sampling event where Bay Lakes and
Chocowinity Bay were sampled, DO concentrations in the existing Bay Lakes pond/basin
and canals were as good or better than DO concentrations in Chocowinity Bay (see
enclosed data). More specifically, every sampling date showed the Bay Lakes waters to
have a higher average DO than Chocowinity Bay, except the 6/14/2007 and 6/11/2009
sampling dates. On those two dates, average DO concentrations in Bay Lakes and
Chocowinity Bay were essentially the same with less than 0.5mg/I difference between
the averages (see.enclosed graph). Excluding the 7/31/2009 sampling which did not
include all sampling stations, average ambient DO concentrations in the Bay Lakes
waters was found to be 7.1 mg/L which is well above the 5mg/L standard.
These data show the DO standard is currently met in the Bay Lakes pond/basin and
canals. In fact, average DO concentrations are not significantly lower, but are often
higher than average concentrations in Chocowinity Bay. Explanations for good water
quality parameters may be related to several factors. Existing connections with
Chocowinity Bay, Taylor Creek, and Rodman Creek prevent the system from being a
closed system. Wind data from Warren Field in Washington, NC, has been included in
this report to document prevailing wind directions. During the summer when DO is
expected to be lowest, predominant winds are from the south, southeast, and southwest.
These wind directions should promote mixing of the waterbodies and in particular
exchange between the Bay Lakes system and Chocowinity Bay. Secondly, it is
expected that groundwater discharge from the wetland system to the west of the
property provides freshwater input which improves water quality. Thirdly, Chocowinity
11

Bay had a measured salinity ranging from 1.5 parts per thousand (ppt) to 9.5 ppt. The
fact that this waterbody appears to be in the oligohaline to mesohaline range rather than
a more brackish range allows for naturally higher DO concentrations.
_ It is also noted that the applicant proposed in the CAMA permit application several
measures to maintain good water quality. These measures include: (1) filling of several
small canals or ditches where the new canal would disconnect the existing canals to
prevent stagnant pockets of water (2) the creation of two additional connections between
the existing pond/basin and existing canals to enhance exchange (3) wetland
_ enhancement along the previously disturbed wetland area and (4) compliance with Tar
Pamlico Riparian buffer regulations which is not currently applied to the property since
DWQ does not recognize it as an open system. The applicant is also willing to remove
the earthen berm and dirt road which exists on the western side of the pond/basin area.
Removing this berm would increase flow and exchange with Taylor Creek.
The Bay Lakes waters are already connected to the adjacent waterbodies and currently
met the defined DO standard. The proposed navigation canal should improve the
connection to Chocowinity Bay, and there is no evidence from the on -site data that the
improved connection would degrade DO in Chocowinity Bay below natural
concentrations.
IV. Dissolved Oxygen Model.
While the intended use of the ambient data was primarily to describe the existing
conditions, LMG also used the data to run the predictive DO model created by NC DWQ
and documented in NC DENR Report # 90-01. It is understood that this model is based
on an expected semi -diurnal tidal cycle, and for this reason, DWQ does not approve its
use in systems without semi -diurnal tides.
As previously described in Existing Connectivity, a tide gauge was placed in the Bay
Lakes basin/pond and in the existing open water canal in Chocowinity Bay. Data from
those gauges was compared to tide data at the Core Creek Bridge, as obtained from
Tides and Currents, NOAA, NC Station ID 8656084. It is known that Chocowinity Bay is
highly influenced by wind tides, and tide gauges were installed to define an average
=-, wind tide amplitude and to correlate water levels between the Bay Lakes waters and
Chocowinity Bay. Somewhat unexpectedly, the hydrographs show a consistent semi -
diurnal component. Data is graphed on a daily basis, and when compared to the tidal
data from the Core Creek Bridge, a twice -daily change in water levels roughly mimicing
the Core Creek data occurs at both the Chocowinity Bay gauge and at the Bay Lakes
gauge (see hydrographs enclosed). The Chocowinity Bay and Bay Lakes hydrographs
show that wind tides and other factors slightly modify the amplitude of any semi -diurnal
effect, but a base amount of semi -diurnal tide appears to be consistent. When the
average change in water level was measured off the hydrographs, an average 1' daily
change was found.
Since a regular, twice daily flux appears to be a component of the water levels based on
the on -site tide gauges, it was felt that the DWQ's DO model could be useful supporting
information to the collected data. The DWQ model was run to predict the effect on
ambient DO in the pond/basin area after the proposed navigation canal was excavated.
Model results are presented in a matrix for a range of both sediment oxygen demand
(SOD) values and ambient DO concentrations (see enclosed matrix). The model
predicts that the DO standard of 5.Omg)L will continue to be met across a wide range of
-5-

SOD and ambient DO after improved connection to Chocowinity Bay is made. The NC
DWQ Environmental Sciences branch has sampled actual SOD in several NC coastal
waters. Previous communication with that office indicated that a SOD value of
2.5gO2/m2/day would be a good average SOD for most coastal areas. The graph of
ambient DO in the existing basin and canals shows that DO during times of year when
values are expected to be lowest averaged more than 5.Omg/L the majority of the time.
The results matrix shows that for an SOD of 2.5gO2/0/day, and for any DO value
greater than 5.0 mg/L, the standard should be met. The DWQ model results predict the
Bay Lakes waters would continue to meet the DO standard which supports the data and
conclusions of the ambient data.
V. Fish Population Study.
During trips to sample ambient water quality, LMG staff consistently noticed fish in the
waters of the Bay Lakes basin/pond and canals. Field notes from the 8/17/2009 water
quality sampling noted gar actively feeding on silversides and minnows in the pond/basin
near the connection to Taylor Creek. It was also very common during sampling events
to see mullet. Conversations with the applicants and other Bay Lakes property owners
indicated the Bay Lakes waters provide good recreational fishing, and species such as
gar, mullet, ell, striped bass, pin fish, croaker, spot, bluegill, and catfish are caught in the
waters.
The presence and apparent abundance of fish species suggests several things: (1) the
use of "aquatic life including propagation and survival' is existing now in the Bay Lakes
waters (2) the presence of species commonly found in adjacent waterbodies further
documents the existing surface water connections and (3) the abundance and variety of
species found in the waters infers water quality is sufficient to support fish life.
To describe the biological integrity of the Bay Lakes waters, LMG conducted a fish
population study of the waters in October 2009 to characterize fish populations currently
utilizing the pond/basin and canals. LMG biologist conducted the fish population study
on 29 and 30 October 2009 during daylight hours. Sampling was coordinated to span
the entire tidal cycle for the two days. A variety of sampling gear types were employed
to indentify as many fish species that may be present at that time of year and season.
Gear types included rod and reel, trot lines, nylon cast nets, and 12 ft. otter trawl with
one quarter inch stretch mesh. Visual observations were made of fish species too small
to be captured with traditional sampling gear. Impromptu interviews of property owners
and fishermen were also conducted in order to obtain anecdotal evidence of fish species
present at other times of the year. Water quality parameters were collected throughout
the waters using a YSI 85 water quality meter (provided in ambient data). Water
temperatures ranged from 19.0 to 19.5 degrees Celsius, and salinity in the lake and
canals ranged from 9.1 to 10.0 ppt. Weather conditions both days were windy and cool
with a Northeast wind at approximately 15-18 knots and air temperatures were in the mid
to upper 60s (F).
Rod and reel fishing was concentrated around the existing connections to Taylor Creek
as well as around shoreline vegetation and structures. Two southern flounder
(Paralichthys lethostigma), 1 red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), 1 longnose gar
(Lepisosteus osseus) and 1 blue gill (Lepomis machrochirus) were collected, measured
and released alive. One large mouth bass was observed but not captured during rod
and reel fishing. Approximately 1,000 Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) were
collected in the nylon cast net. Menhaden were observed in large numbers throughout
M

the lake and canal system during the incoming tidal period. Many small prey species
were visually observed along the banks and included mosquito fish (Gambusia spp),
striped mullet (Mugil cephalus), and bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilii). Bay anchovy were
also collected in the otter trawl which was towed for two one -minute trawls in the main
portion of the lake. No other fish species were collected with the otter trawl. No fish
were collected by the trot lines which were baited with catfish bait and allowed to fish
overnight for approximately 12 hours. Many Atlantic blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus)
were encounterd during rod and reel fishing and likely removed all the catfish bait from
the trot lines before any catfish could locate the baited gear.
It has been observed that many of these species travel up Taylor Creek and enter the
Bay Lakes and canals through the existing, tidally influenced connection. The fish study
shows that the Bay Lakes pond/basin and canals currently harbor many species similar
to those found in Chocowinity Bay. There is no evidence to suggest that the existing
defined use would be lost with an improved navigable connection. In fact, the addition of
an access channel to the Bay Lakes system would likely have a beneficial impact on
species by providing two entrance and exit points for fish to migrate in and out of the
pond and canals. Also, more flushing of the pond and canals could benefit those
species that already utilize the Bay Lakes system. Adding a more navigable entrance to
the pond and canals will create additional public trust bottom to be utilized by the
recreational fishing community which would also support the defined uses.
VI. Summary.
The Bay Lakes property is a relatively unique situation in that the basin and canals
already exist. We feel it is reasonable to conclude the Bay Lakes system will continue to
meet the DO standard and antidegradation policy without additional modeling based on:
(1) the basin and canals already exist and ambient DO values currently meet or exceed
the state standard (2) the basin and canals can currently be considered an "open
system" with connections to Taylor Creek, Rodman Creek, and Chocowinity Bay (3) the
DENR DO model predicts the DO standard will be met after construction of the proposed
canal and (4) a relatively high biological diversity and the defined aquatic uses appear to
be present in the waters now.
Ambient DO values are above the standard and the exchange of water from flushing
should not have a detrimental impact on the adjacent waters. The applicant is also
proposing several mitigative measures to improve flushing. The CAMA application details
a request to close and fill any potential "dead pockets" at the upper ends of existing canals
that will be cut-off by the new canal. The application also shows the creation of two
connections to improve flow between the pond/basin and the proposed canal. A canal
currently connects the pond/basin and Chocowinty Bay and was proposed to be filled in
the CAMA application. That request is being revised and the canal would remain open to
further promote exchange and flushing.
The purpose of the requested navigable canal would allow access to Chocowinity Bay by
small recreational runabouts. The final depth proposed is only 4 NLW, and this depth will
restrict most large boats. There is one existing lot owner who has a larger boat stored in
one of the existing canal, but the applicant feels this is atypical. The applicants, who live
on the property and know the neighboring property owners, expect that existing
homeowners will primarily use small boats without heads. The applicant has indicated that
the adjacent subdivisions of Portside and Bayside represent a similar anticipated use. The
7-

Portside subdivision has roughly the same number of canal lots as Bay Lakes, and the
majority of boats in that subdivision are small runabouts and pontoon boats.
Allowing a navigable connection will make the waters public trust waters subject to all
applicable state laws. An acknowledged and authorized connection will also provide the
opportunity to enforce riparian buffer standards and further protect the waters. Every
owner of property in the subdivision has been notified that Neuse riparian buffer
requirements would become effective. Signed forms and/or certified mail receipts were
returned from those notifications, and LMG is not aware of any owner who has concern
over new restrictions in the riparian buffer. The applicant is also willing to place deed
restrictions on lots on the central peninsula that have not yet been platted.
We request that the DWQ please review this report and supporting documentation as a
response to our 10/22/2009 meeting and DWQ's following 11/25/2009 letter and in lieu of
a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model.

r '
Ex. Connection to Rodman Creek - >•
• j . _ Y , ° - !G (culvert under Whichards
Beach Road)
.e.
N. Ex. Connection to Taylor Creek
s (buried culverts, rip rap over top,
approximately I'to 2' below NWL)
Ex. Connection to Taylor Creek
rr- (surface water flows over low area)
•:�F1 - , �'-, Connection to Chocowinity Bay
(surface water Flow, tidal exchange
,= existing canal connects Bay and
3 �• pondlbasin area)
�- i
LMG
LAND MANAGEdAEPT GROUP wc.
`— FOVIrOnTPM41 Con3Offonri
N
W+E
S
SCALE 1" = 700'
Mr. Warren Whichard
1998 Aerial Photograph Bay Lakes, Chocowinity Bay
(showing existing connections)

fting
.
5 '' connection to Taylor CreekT
1 �F
T
1
9
� ` x
R - -- Existing Berm w/ dirt road
(could be removed to improve connection)
Taylor Creek to left, Bay Lakes to right
4; Aft
,0
Alt
+M+�
04 x
�r
- dp act_

f
az'
i 1V,
+1I
wo
> 1
- t 1.-4:
�•�� t� .1� �I •ru-.iC J�
A BOunda11C5 dlF dYP1UR1T11dle d1IU d1V
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
Mr. Warren Whichard I
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity Bay
CAMA Major Permit application
SITE
ZLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUT' me
Environmenrnl Consulmnb
October 2009
N
W+E
S
SCALE 1" = 700'
Tide Gauge Locations

Figure 1 Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2
36
30
24
18
12
6
0
-6
-12
-18
-24
-30
01 O� O� 01 O) 01 01 O� 01 01 53 01 01 O� Q1 O�
O� 01 OY
\ 'z
)Jr )JC )Jc )JC )JC
'`' '��
.�tj .�6' .�'�• .�0 ��' �O �'`' �`l; �"� rL�'• 2h ry�d �1' 2� 29 ,�O
.�0' v0
Tides
• Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1)
+Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2)
tide data from core creek
Land Management Group, Inc. e brld
www.lmgroup.net g
► Bay Lakes
► Chocowinity, NC
► Well 1 - A286960
► Well 2 - EBD9FCE
► June 15 - June 30, 2007
► Reading every 1/2 hour

Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2
36
30
N 24
d
L
v 18
C
12
N
J 6
L
d
0
3
c
-6
0
/L -12
V
-18
-24
-30
O� O� O� 01 01 01 01 01 6 01 6 6 6
w Tides
Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1)
+Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) ► Bay Lakes
► Chocowinity, NC
►
tide data from core creek Well 1 - A286960Well 2 - EBD9FCE
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net bridge ► July 1 - July 15, 2007
► Reading every 1/2 hour

Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2
36
30
N 24
N
L
V 18
C
12
CD
J 6
L
Qi
R 0
C -6
0
i -12
0
-18
-24
-30
O, 01 01 01 01 O� O� 01 01 01 01 O� O�
m Tides
--Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1)
+Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) ► Bay Lakes
► Chocowinity, NC
tide data from core creek ' Well 1 - A286960
Land Management Group, Inc. ► Well 2 - EBD9FCE
www.lmgroup.net bridge ► July 16 - July 31, 2007
► Reading every 1/2 hour

Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2
y 24
N
L
V is
C
12
CD
J 6
i
O
0
C C -6
3
O
� -12
CS
-18
-24
-30
OA OA 01 01 01 01 01
1;:;P V ,VPJJ' 1P CYP oP P �P �P V �P
Tides
• Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1)
+Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) . Bay Lakes
► Chocowinity, NC
►
tide data from core creek Well 1 - A286960Well 2 - EBD9FCE
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net bridge ► Aug 1 - Aug 15, 2007
► Reading every 1/2 hour

36
30
W 24
0f
L
C 18
Z 12
J 6
CD
0
C M -6
7
0 2
-16
-24
-30
Figure 1 contd. Hydrology Monitoring; Gauges 1 and 2
�! �I�Illlllllt���L�r
T. s
wirst!
&N=AW,A&
01 O� P5 01 01 O� 01 O� 01 01 01 O�
JA
6P �P '� �P '� cy �L �P P `L 2P �P �L 2 � r �L 6P �L1P
2 �L
Tides
+Bay Lakes Wooden Dock (Well 1)
I-Chocowinity Bay Boat Landing (Well 2) . Bay Lakes
► Chocowinity, NC
tide data from core creek ' Well 1 - A286960
Land Management Group, Inc.
► Well 2 - EBD9FCE
www.imgroup.net bridge ► Aug 16 - Aug 27, 2007
► Reading every 1/2 hour

y .
r
e ,
.ram I�� �j .' -i' s \.. j •'- * � � �1+ < .� "y
. •A:. -.
le
74
iK
Jrr
Fx ♦ �'
le
fi
k
0 350 700 1400
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" = 700'
Land Management Group, Inc. CAMA Major Permit Application
Environmental Consultants AMBIENT WATER QUALITY Bay Lakes
P.O. Box 2522 MONITORING STATIONS Applicant: Mr. Warren Whichard
Wilmington, NC 28402 SUnllller 2007 T
910-452-0001 Location: C:hocowinity Bay, Beaufort County
LMG # 01-07-208 Appendix

2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
6114/2007
Smf:nn
WO-1
Tma
Bottom Depth-1.5tt
Depth
Sampled
N
1 Temp Cj
DO m IL
islp.c.q (S
Salinity
t
0.5
24.7
7.6
3009
1.6
hoots. sampled In'nooemy Day aI Om weo ant
WQ-2
Tme
Bottom Depth- 2.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem °C
DO m /L
S .Con Sl
Salinity
t
0.5
24.T
].]
3260
1.T
Notes: sampled In GimpoNy Bay On well and open watef
-
Time
Time
Bottom Depth- 3.5ft
Depth
Sampled
N
Tem °C
DO m IL
S .Lon S
Salinity
t
0.5
248
].6
3212
1.]
3.0
24.6
].fi
32151
1.7
Notes: Chocovdniy Bay (open watel)
W04
Time
Bottom Depth, 2.Oft
Depth
Sampled
R
iTemp °C
DO m M1
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
24.8
7.6
3196
1.7
Notes: Chocowinity Bay (creek towards breech)
WO-5
Time
Bottom Depth. 2.Ofl
Depth
Sampled
ft
Tem 'C
DO reIl.
S .Con S
Salinity
t
D.5
24.3
7.3
3,072
1.6
Notes: Gnomvnmry nay (meek tawam5 ome.)
WQ-6
Time
Bottom Depth-2.Oft
Depth
Sampled
R
Tem CCI
DO m L
SP.Con 5
Salinity
t
0.5
24.3
2 2
3069
IS
Notes: Gnocownly bay (creel, towards pMecb). Oner/oeaver In water
WQ-12
Time
Bottom Depth. 1.5f1
Depth
Sampled
ft)
Temp °C
DO m l-
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
25.4
6.9
2942
1.5
Notes: sampled at breech, Chocowinity Bay side
WQ-7
Tme
BoHdm Depth-2.5ft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Temp C
DO m M1
SP.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
24.9
7.1
2,9051
1.5
Notes: sampled at existing UOU, wall Site RL (bay Lases)
WQ-9
Tme
Bottom DeptM1-2.Of1
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tam C
DO m IL
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
6.0
2589
1.3
..as (°anal L (Day Laxesl
WQ-10
Tme
Bottom Depth- 2.Oft
Depth
Sampled
ft)
Tam 'C
DO m 2
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
a5
25.fi
6.0
2486
1.2
(Day Laxesl
WQ-11
Tme
Bottom Depth. 1.5ft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem °C
DO m n-
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
25.7
9.7
2396
1.2
Notes: Canal4 (bay Lases)
Chocowinity Bay -Surface Water Quality Statistics
SP.Con
Salinity
Te_mpl°Cl
DO finnoti
103
19211
Chocowlnity any -Mean
24.7
7.4
3121.9
1.6
Chocowinity Bay - Min
24.3
6.9
294LO
1.5
Chocowinity Bay -Maz
26A
7.7
3260.0
1.7
Bay Ulles- Surface Water Quality Statistics
SP.Con
Silin'
Tem* Vcn
DO m R
(µSI
1pa l
Bay Lakes -Mean
25.5
7.2
2,694
1.3
Bay Lakes - Min
24.9
6.0
2,396
1.2
Bay Lakes -Max
25.7
9.7
2,905
1.5

ctnrinn
2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
6/29/2007
Stntinn
WQ-1
Bottom Depth- I.Oft
Depth
Sampled R
Tem °C
DO m
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
29.2
7.1
3708
1.6
Notes: samplea In cnocwmny, bay at ola well site
WQ-2
Bottom De th-1.0ft
Depth
Sam lad ft
Tem °C
DO m 2
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
29.3
7.0
3.001
7.6
Notes: upstream OI Well, towards DreeOn
WQ-3
Bottom Depth- 2.0ft
Depth
Sam led R
Tem 'C
DO(m 2
Sp.Con S
Salinity
(Pli
0.5
29.3
7.11
3,2261
1.6
Notes: Chocowmity Bay (open water)
WQ4
Bottom Depth-1.Sft
Depth
Sampled R
Temp °C
DO m L
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
29.1
7.4
3,211
1.7
Notes: Gnoccwlnny tlay (moWl Or creek lo'Dealt ramp )
WO.5
Bottom De th-0.8ft
Depth
Sam led JM
Tem j
00 (mgj
S .Can S
Salinity
1
0.5
29.8
6.9
3790
1.7
Notes: Ghocowinity Bay (la distance up creek to "boat ramp')
WQ_6
Bottom De th-O.Bft
Do
Sam
.
y
(
05m28
9
].D
37Salinit
1
1.6
ry ... ae,uymu ai u.auenry - well e l site
WQ-7
Bottom Depth- 2.0ft
Depth
Sampled
it
Temp °C
DO m /L
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
30.7
6.5
3,105
1.6
notes: sample.. well FL.Doty Lakes)
WQ-8
Bottom De ih-O.Bft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Temp °C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
D.5
31.D
7.4
3078
1.6
Notes: Canal l (bay Lakes)
WO-9
Bottom Depth. 1.5ft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem 'C
DO m L
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
30.4
7.61
2,913
1.5
Notes: Canal 2 (Bay Lakes)
WQ-10
Bottom Depth- 1.5ft
Depth
Sampled
it
Temp °C
DO m 2
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.61
30,61
7.21
2,796
1.3
Notes; Banal 3 (Bay Lakes), noted a Oecease0 Dlue crab
WQ-11
Bottom De th-1.5ft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Temp°C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.51
30.9
8.2
2 785
1.4
Notes: .,anal a ttlay Lakes)
Chocowiniry, Bay -surface water Dustily Statistics
S C..
Salfinity
Tam °C
DO (ni
(US)
(p tt
Chocawiniry Bay - Mean
29.4
7.1
3,161
1.6
Chocowinity Bay -Min
29.1
6.9
3,001
1.6
Chocowiniry, Bay -Max
29.8
7A
3,228
1.7
Bay Lakes - Surface Water Quality Stadstics
Sd.Con
Salinity
Tem °C
DO (mn/Ll
ILISI
fppJ
Bay Lakes - Mean
30.7
7.4
2,936
1.5
Bay Lakes - Min
30.4
6.6
2.785
1.3
Bay Lakes - Max
31.0
8.2
3.105
1.6

2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, ChocoWinity, NC
7/2012007
WO-1
Bottom Dept], 3.511
Der
Sam letl R
Tem °C
DO m /L
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
30.9
].9
3T14
2.0
3.0
29.8
4.5
4780
2.5
notes. samara. m'n-.' Day m mu wan sne
WQ-2
Bottom Deladr.2.5ft
Depm
Sam led h
Tem °C
DO m IL
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
31.2
].2
3231
1.7
2.0
31.1
6.81
3,272
1.7
oresm
WO-3
Bottom De t11-3.5M1
Depth
Sam Cd fl
Tem -C
DO m
S .Con 5
Salinity
1
0.5
30.1
8.2
4 003
2.1
1 3.0
29.4
2.8
534D
2.5
Notes: Gmxxk nay nay ,an ware,
WQi
Bottom De th-35M1
DBpih
Sam led R
Tamp°C
DO m
$ .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
29.8
8.4
4 061
2.1
1 3.0
29.5
3.61
5470
2.8
Notes: cnocomnity Day (ma.m 01 trees To -coal ramp )
WQ-5
Bottom Dean- I.Sft
Depm
Sam letl fl
Tem 'C
DO re IL
S .Can S
SalihOy
t
0.5
29.7
nmas. wDwmmry eay p,<usynce up oaee to wm,anpl
WO-9
Bottom De Ot D.BR
DepN
Sam letl R
Tam °C
DO m L
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
31.2
7.0
2 ]B3
1.4
nines. sample. a1 ..a, ramp -wen... sin
WO-T
Bottom Death- 1.011
Depth
Sampled
k
Tom °C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.51
33
12.3
3219
1.1
N0189: tamales al Wall RL (Bay Lakes)
FQ:DepU,1.0ft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Tem °C
DO m
Socon
S
Salinity
[0.6
335
10.e
3218
1.7
tDdy Lai...j
E:-Deptn-0.8M1
Depth
Sampletl
Tem °Cis
Sp.Con
Salinity
Notes: Canal (Bay Lakes)
FQ:1-0De 2.Ofl
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem °C
DO m IL
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t0.s
33
12.8
2 926
NOW4. -1di a IDey cawal
WQ-11
Battsm Depth- 2.Oft
OepN
Sampletl
R
Tem °C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
33.1
12.8
2,064j
1.6
Notes: Canal (Bay Lakes)
Chocowlnity Bay- Surface Water Quality Statistics
S.CCon
Salinity
Tempt,
DO anR.
lµSI
Ipptj
Chocowinity Bay - Mean
30.5
7.7
3,5a3
10
Chocowinity Bay - Min
29.7
7.0
2,70
1.4
Choeowlnfty Bay -Miss
31.2
8.4
4,041
2.5
Bay Lakes - Surface Water Quality Statistics
$o Con
Salinity
Tem °C
QO(moll-1
iLl
Ip2I
Bay Lakes - Mean
33.1
12.0
2,881
1.6
Bay Lakes - Min
32.7
10.6
2,084
1.4
Bay Lakes-M.
33.5
12.8
3,219
1.7

2007 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
8127/2007
WQ-1
Bottom De th-3.5f1
Depth
Sampletl
11
Tem °C
DO m /L
S .Can S
Seliniry
t
0.5
3.0
29.4
4.61
7430
4.2
notes, s mplaD m wD,, nny Dey
WQ-2
Bosom Depth. 3.5ft
Depth
Sampled
It
Tone °C
DO- m h
S .Con J,Si
Salinity
d
05
3.0
29,4
51
B030
4.6
npms: upsueam at weµ towama Dream
WQJ
Boham Death-3.5tt
Depth
Sampled
11
IT Me °C
DO m /L
S .Con fusi(Poll
Salinity
0.5
29si
5.5
8.2201
4.5
3.0
29.5
d.9
8380
4.5
notes. cnoocaanlw no, Wpen wads)
W"
Bosom Depth- 3.5 ft
Depth
Sampled
ft
ITMOD CJDO
m L
5 .Con S
Salinity
t
D.5
29fi
5.5
62]0
4.4
1 3.01
29st
4.9
6390
4.5
NOtee: Gnoccwtnity tlay (mOUm OI onaK t0 "peat Rmp )
WQ-5
Banam Depth. 1.0tt
Depth
Sampled
It
LOP CJ
DO an
S .Con S
Seliniry
t
0.5
29.1
5.5
8120
4.I
Notes: enpcovnmty Day (112 olstance Up cmea TO -Door ramp )
WOE
Bottom Depth- 1.0ft
ep
SDm th
Split
t
0.5
28.1
5.61
7,9001
4.4
Notes: sampled at 'beat ramp° -well 81 site
W0.7
Bosom Da th. 1.0f1
Depth
Sampled
II
Tem, 1.1
DO fenTil
Sp.Cdn
S
Salinity
t
0.5
29.4
5.1
] 160
3.9
News: sampled at well 6l tuay LHMes)
E-1
...It
Depth
Sampled
N
Tem°C
DO m L
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
29.8
6.5
] 140Death.
3.9
toay Lanns/
WBoOtt-o9m De DI-1.Sit
opthSp.SeSalinity
Samp
Team L
DO m IL
Con
S)
t
R
]2
.6
notes. Ianal4 (Day Laaaa)
WQ-10
Boom Da th-1.51t
Depth
Sampled
%
Tem °C
DO m )L)
Sp.Con
I (PSI
Salinity
I f229
5.3 50
3.4
Notes: Canal J ttlay Lall
WQ-11
Be... Depth. I SIt
Depth
Sampled
N
Tem °C
DO m
Sp.Cdn
S
Salinity
t
0.5
2S8
7.0
6040
3.3
Notes: Canal (bay Lakes)
Chocpwinity Bay - Surface Water Quality SbatlsOcs
S�Can
Sallnft
em C
Winds-]
l0i
1i
•Ohomwiraft Bay -Mean
29.3
6.8
7.940
4.4
Chocowinity Bey - Min
28.1
5.2
7.510
4.2
Choeowlnity Bay -Mee
29.7
7.2
3.270
4.5
Bay tskes- Surface Water DOWN Stallefica
,SS.Lon
Salinl
Team f°C1
DO fmcl
ty�5
1ppg
Bay Lakes - Mean
- 29.5
6.7
6,668
3.6
Bay Lakes - Min
29.3
5.1
6,040
3.3
Bay Lakes -Mai
29.8
7.7
7,160
3.9

I
".e
� ✓r _ r
f3
Q-11
44
�AL.` r
r■r�
0 350 700 1400
'Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" = 700'
Land Management Group, Inc. CAMA Major Permit Application
Environmental Consultants AMBIENT WATER QUALITY Bay Lakes
P.O. Box 2522 MONITORING STATIONS Applicant: Mr. Warren Whichard
Wilmington, NC 28402
910-452-0001 Summer 2009 Location: Chocowinity Bay, Beaufort County
LMG # 01-07-208 Appendix

2008 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
10/14/2008
Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 10/1412008 done in conjunction with SAV and Shellfish Survey done on the same day.
Rtfi n
WO-1
Time
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled H
Tem °C
DO mt
Sp.Con
Salinity
t
now. rva.a mv,ea
WO-2
Time
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sam letl fl
Tem °C
DO m
S .Con
Saliniy
D.: nimeampwe
WQ41
Time
BoHam Depth-3Dfl
Depth
Sam led fl
Tem °C
DO m /L
S .Can(poll
Salinity
0.5
23.8
0.39
1,
9A
2.5
2Ul
TMI
16"1
9A
- mry", oymi wam,
W04
Time
Bono. Dep1A O.OR
Depth
Sam led fl
Tem °C
DO myt
S .Con S
Salinity
t
0.5
23.]
8.36
1620
9.5
2.5
21.6
8.62
16D0
9.5
chow my Say -open water
WO-5
Time
Bottom Dept. 2.0fl
Depth
Sam led fl
Tem °C
DO m
S .Con S
Salinity
1.5
23.3
0.6
1610
96
man -mace cnannei in woianen ry eay, one pmm in waver wmmn Due w uepm
WQ-6
Time
Bottom Depth-2.Dfl
Depth
Sampled fl
Temp °C
DO m
S .Con S
Salinity
1.5
M.
5.6]
1 ST/
9.2
,n,yoey. vee Vvun iv wa,vi wiuviii uuv,u uvVui
WO-12
Time
Bottom Dept
Depth
Sam led ft
Tam °C
DOmS
Con
Salinity ty
t
rvp[e. a- mwea
WO-)
Time
Bono m Depth-5.5ft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Temp°C
DO m L
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
1
0.5
23.6
7.9
1638
96
5.0
21.9
].6
16]0
9.6
tuna area, nay taxee
WD-8
Time
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled
R
Tem °C
DO m IL
Sp.Ccn
salinity
t
Note: Notaamplea
Time
Bottom Depllt-4.Oft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Tem °O
DO m IL
Sp.Can
S
SalinityW0.9
t
I.
0.5
23.4
9.86
1639
1 3.51
21.7
7.0
1627
9.8
near mean e, man i. eey Lanes
WTiBomQtl-eo1m0 Oepth
Depth
Sampled
H
Tem °C
DO mL
Sp.Con
Sainy
t
0.5
23.3
1615
9.5
65
21.3
5.9
1616-5fl
9.5
carat, eay Laxaa
Time
Banam Depth-S.On
Depth
Sampled
H
Tem °C
DO m IL
Sp.Con
S
SalinityWO-11
t
0.5
34.]
10.3
1633
9.fi
45
21.5
5.9
1616
9.5
1
,.enei,..'unen
Chocoadnity Bay - Surface Water Quality statsties
SO.Con
SaliniW
Tam °c
Wfm99.1
list
Iepfl
Chocoadnity Bay -Mean
22.6
7.9
1604.5
9A
Chacowlniy Bay- Min
21A
52
1M.0
92
Chocowlnly Bay -Max
0.8
8.6
1820.0
91
Bay
takes -S odure Water Quality Sta9eBca
3o Con
SaliniW
Tem,r
Dulsly
Iasi
I9e0
Bay takes - Mean
227
7.9
1631.8
9.6
Be, Lakes - Min
21A
5.9
1615.0
9.5
Bay Lakes -Max
U.T
10.3
1670.0
9.7

2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
611112009
Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 6111/2009 done in conjunction with a SAV Survey done on the same day.
Station
-
WD-i
nme
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled
ft
Tem C
DO m h
S .Con s
Salinity
NOta. nmiampma
WO-2
mme
Botlam Depth
DeP1h
samvlea
X
Tem °c
DO m IL
3 .con(,Sli
salinity
1yae. nm samples
Time
Time
Bottom Depth-4.dfl
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem C
DO m h
5 .Con S
salinity
( t
0.5
28.6
5.90
5.380
2.6
2
28.6
5.
5420
2.]
J 5
29.8
6.2525
5410
2.7
wacownny eay-open water
WDJ
more
BOHDm Depth-3.Ofl
Depth
Sampled
fl
Temp 'L
DO m IL
S .Con s1
6ellnlly
t
11.8
29.9
6.44
5560
2:]
2.5
29.8
609
5560
2]
Lh0000mily Bay open wmer
WQ-a
Time
Bottom Depth-3.Oft
Depth
Sampled
H
Tem °C
DO m 2
S .Con S
sallnlry
1
0.5
2a5
506
5500
2.]
2.5
20.0
4.22
5400
2.7
WQ8
Time0.5
Bottom Depth-3.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem L
0. DO m
S .Con Sin
Salinity
29.8
5.2
5.2401
2.5
25
28A
2.5
5000
==2.T
Man-made channel In
North wind, party cloudy, 85-87 F
WO-]
Tlme
Bosom Depth -aft
Depn
Sampled
M
Tem C
Do m h
Sp.Lon
S
S(op)y
t)
0.5
30.1
fi.B
4672
2.4
4.0
20.3
22
44s9
2A
]5
zez
1.e
44)]
2.a
Paso area. nay uaea
we-9
mme
Bottom Depth -ZOO
Depth
Sampled
ft1
rem c
Do m A-
Sa9532.1
0.5
29
]1
2].]
5.4
8.4
6,5
2].0
a.5
,anah eay aree
E.
Time
Bottom D.'I Tod
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem L
DO m
S,Con
6
Salinity
t
0.5
31
22
3 )20
1.9
3.5
20.1
B.B
3 )01
1.9
6.5
2].3
2.8
3662
10
canm, eay ¢axes
WO-11
Tlme
Baflom Depth -BOO
Dap
Sampled
Tem L
DO m IL
s
Shost
Salinity
t
D.5
316
a.3
3541
18
3.0
28.1
48
4560
18
5.5
2).T
25
3520
1.0
sandl oay
WO8
Time
Bottom Depth. 6.Ott
Depth
sampled
ft
Tem C
DO m IL
SP.Lon
s
salinity
1
0.5
30.1
65
4a20
2A
1 3.0
30,11
BA
4886
2.4
8.5
30
59
4088
2.4
,ana,, eay 4axea
WO-12
Tune
Baflom Depth. 811
Depth
sampled
fl
-
Tem C
DO d
Sp.Lon
s1
6allnity
t
0.5
30.7
e.]
03W
2.3
4.0
28.5
3.5
4A05
Z3
11 7,6
28.31
2.51
6461
24
rono area, eay Laaaa
WQ-13
Time
Bottom Depth-6.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem 'C
DO nah
Spoon
S
Salinity
t
0.5
30
62
4456
2.4
3.01
2821
2.6
4421
2.3
5sl
28.21
2.1
4,422
28
rono area, oay eases _
chocowlntty tray -surface Water Quoddy saafie8cs
-
secant
Salinity _
Tem °c
DO(or l
1.51
twit
ChoeowlnRy Bay - Mean
29.5
5.4
6403.3
2.7
Chocowinity say -Min
28.6
25
50110.0
2.5
ChocowlnHy Bay -Mae
29.9
BA
6580.0
2.7
Bay
lakes -Surface
Water Quality
Statistics
SOCon
salinity
Tem
JmB21
IpJ
(RIM
Bay Lakes - Mean
29.0
S.1
4237.9
2.2
eay lakes -Min
27.3
1.8
3520.0
1.8
Bay Lakes - Max
31.6
9.3
4820.0
2.4

2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay lakes, Chomwinity, NC
713112009
Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 7/31/2009 done from bulkhead at ends of canals.
Station Station
Depth
Sampled salinity
WQ-1 fl Tem C DO m 2 3 Can (S 1
rma
Bottom Depth station d l removed from Sampling er al20DSDWQRe mart
WQ-]
nme
Banom DepN
Depth
Sampled
Oft)TempC
DO h
Lan
Sp s
Salinity
h
Near Station T, sampled from seeing pier
Dep
Sampl H Saliniy
WQ-2 R T.-c 00 h — .Con S
Time
Bottom Depth am ..a
mmoyed from sion2lors Ier 613009 oW0 Re meth
WQ3
Time
Bottom Depth
Depth
sampled
Oft
Tem L
Do m IL)S
Con S
Salinity
,.no, .....na—a— a-eamme. on .........
wow
rime
Bonom Depth
Depth
Sampled
fl
ram °c
DO m ti
s .con s
Salinity
t
Lnocowmlry, Sharon not sampled on 7131rspo5
WO-5
Time
Bonom Depth
Depth
Sampled
I Ot,IT,rap
rj
DO m 2
So Con S
Salinity
0
cnocdwmlly Spoons not sampled an 7nln009
WOA
rma
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem °C
DO m IL
S .Can 6(Poll
Salinity
Ln emainny station not Sampled on7nni as
Depth
Sampled Salinity
WQ-12 m Tem C DO m IL s .Con S
rime
Bottom Depth Spllon pl2 removetl from Somalian per MOOS DWQ Reddest
Choccarmiy Bay - Mean WA WA NIA WA
Choaowinfty Bay - Min WA WA WA WA
Chocasirun Bay -Max NIA WA WA WA
WO-9
Time
BDnom D¢pm-4.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tape,'C
DO anti(Poll
S13.1
Salinity
0.5
29.8
se
. 7S
3.5
29.3
5.6
1.
sampled m varyheatl of venal from OWkEead
WO-10
rma
Banom Depth-a.ort-
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem 200
man
sp.Lon
salinity
0.5
29.]
0.1
1.280
7.3
3.5
29.5
3.1
1278
7.3
aamprea ar wry neaa
WO-11
Time
Bottom Depth- t.5fl
Depth
Sampled
n
rem c
DO m
6p.Can
(m
Salinity
(Poll
0.5
3D.5
6.0
1.299
7.4
Battered seven, neaa on coital prom attention!
Wo-t3Sh
Time
Bonom Depth
Depth
sampled
Tem Cc)
Dom 2
Sp.Con
s
Salinity
rvu,s nm,au
WQ-16
Tme
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tem L
DO m
Sp.Co.
3
Salinity
nua—ami..
Time
Time
Bonom DepN-2.0fl
Denh
Sampled
fl
Tamp
OO m h
seODn
S
Salinity
1
0.5
39.9
0.
7.9
1393
1.5
1.5
29?
5.4
1,3011
J.4
Bay lakes -Surface Water OwIlly Statistics
SO.Con Balmily,
Tem °C Dome (am (RO
Baylakea-Mean. 29.9 SA 1295.0 TA

2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
aiv=09
Station
Depth Salinity
WO-1 Sam led R Tem 0 DO m M1 S .Con 5 t
Time
Bottom Depth 6MIlon 0l Feamm, he Somalia 1 0,er 612009 DWO Re neat
Depth salinity
WO-2 Sam led X rem D DO M1 5 .can s t
Time
Bottom Depth -ma-d g i hemmed M1om Gam tin ar 820090WQ Ro uest
WO-3
Time
Bottom Depm-5.On
Depth
sam led n
Tem c
Do /L
s can s
selinity
0.5
29.]
82
1311
].5
1 2,611
1333
].]
4,01
29.21
1341
]T
ChocoMnlly Bey -open water
WO<
Time
Bottom Depth-3.Ofl
Depth
Sem led
Tent C
Do m M1
s .con S
Sellnny
0.5
2S6
50
1335
).0
2.5
29.5
5.3
1341
7.4
,.nuwmnny ouy- aMen ^'ma,
WG5
Time
Bottom Depth-3aft
Depth
Sem led X
Tem L
DO m M1
S .Oon S
Salinity
1
0.5
29.3
4.7
1,3431
].]
2.5
28.3
2.9
1340
].]
Mall -made eternal In Cnm'aa nlly Bay
W0.6
Mine
Bottom Depth. 3.0X
Depth
Sam led n
Tam c
Dom
S .can s
Salinity
t
os
256
39
t,3u
]s
Z51
27.9
3.41
1.3251
7.6
manmade cnanne, in --ma, any. nine ez,aemv
Daplt Salinity
Wo-12 sam Ina Tem c Do m IL s .con s
Mine
Bottom Depth Stanon012 mmowdlrom SamYlingpar612009DWQReauem
� I
WO-)
Tfine
.mm. Depth. 5AX
Depth
Samplad
X
Tem •C
Do M1
S,Con
5
Sillmil
1
0.5
30.3
6.9
1,257
).1
2.0
30.1
a.]
1257
].2
4.5
29.3
3.2
1.2]0
].3
W69
Time
eattam Deplb 4.0fl
Depth
sampled
fl
Tam 'c
Dom
sp.Con
Salinity
t
D.s
30.3
e.o
1 a
e.9
2B
28.0
5.0
1.22]
6.9
&5l
29a
3.0
1 220
0.9
WO-10
Time
Bonn. Depth-4.efl
Depth
Sampled
Tem 'c
DO A-s
S,Can
SaOnlly
t
0.51
3D.1
9.6
1190
6.8
zol
29.6
6.7
1188
6.7
3.5
282
3BI
1183
6.7
W 11
Than
Boman Depth. 4on
Depth
Sampled
Tam •C
oo m M1
BD.Don
s
Sallnlry
0.5
30A
e.t
1 t8T
0.8
2.0
29.4
d.]
1188
S.8
3.5
30.1
2.5
1160
8.8
WQ-13
Time
Bonom Depth -Safi
Depth
Sampled
X
Team,C
DO m M1
Sp.Can
a
Salinity
1
0.5
30
6.1
1 0o
]2
4B
28.8
4.0
1 ]0
]2
T.0
29.4
3.6
12]0
].2
FBD,PUh-6.on
Depth
Semple0
fl
I
Tam C
I
DO m M1
6p.con
S
S(no)y
0.5
3o
s.a
t2]4
)a
4.0
29.8
4.5
1,276
].3
7.0
39A
2]
1,2)1
]J
chacewlnny Bay -Surface Water Quality Shahid"
Be.Den
S.RapW
Tem •c
Dam
1ABI
tpp1l
Chocowlnity Bey- Mean
29,1
4.6
1332.a
7.6
chacewlnfly say •Min
31.8
2.8
1311'a
]A
Chocowlniy Bay -Mu
29.7
62
1343.0
].)
Bay takes-Surfaae Water Quality Sta4stics
Sp.con
Selfinlor
Temel'C1
DO1mgILl
IBS1
/PB11
Bay lakes - Mean
29J
SA
1230.0
7.0
Bay Laken-Mln
20.1
2.5
1166.0
6.6
Bay Lakes -Mee
30A
9.6
1276.0
7.3
Note: A "great many" mullet were noted in the Bay Lakes pond area during this sampling.
Near the connection with Taylor Creek, a tide was flowing Into Bay Lakes waters over the
existing rip rap and culverted area. A gar was seen in this area actively feeding on silversides
and minnows.

2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chomwinity, NC
9/9/2009
Station Station
Depin
SamplM Sa6Nly
WO-0 fl) Tem DO m M1 6 .Con S
Time
Bottom Depth Smtlpn Ht removed Bom Sampllnp cerW3009 DWO Repuest
Wp-J
Tvne
BOtlom DepN-S.Oft
D plh
Sampled
Tem C
OO m
Sp.COn
8
SaOniry
0S
35
4./
1313
J 6
20
25
4A
1313
].5
4.5
25
4.0
1310
].8
Notes: eampled In Chav my Bey at aW well&b P.M area. Bey lakes
Depth
Sampled SalinR
WO-2 ram •c Do m a s con
rme
Bottom Depth $YIiOn H3 rempvetl irom5ampting perfiR009 DWC Repuest
L
yJO.i
Time
Batlom Dep6n3.5ft
Depth
5ampl.d
OR
Tem
DO m
S Aon S)
SeOnfty
0.5
26.9
2.96
1609
03
3.01
24.91
2.841
1.
0.6
WO-4
TMe
BORom DBp8F3.Oft
Depm
SamplM
Tem 'C
OO m
S .Can S
Satiny
05
24A
2.3
1353
To
25
24 .1
22
143s
83
..npapmnm oar open water
vv E
Tme
Bodam Oep0F3.OR
Deli
SamplM
ITemp
C
DO
S .Can S
5auray
0.5
242
22
1321
7.6
z5l
34.1
12.1
1323
] 6
WOE
Tme
BoRom Dept-3.OM1
Ioepm
Sampled
Oft)Tem
C
DO
S.Con(
SeOnfty
p.5
24.1
2.0
1 Y9
].5
2.51
241
1.71
1.305
ZS
WO-9
Time
Bottum DepRF4.Oft
Tem C
m m h
S,con
S
salinity
A
25.5
SO
1293
7.4
Canal,Bay Lakes
WO-10
Time
eonpm DeM, a oft
Depm
Sampled
fl
amp'C
DO mOppil
Sp.Con
Salinity
0.5
249
81
1283
T4
3.5
24.9
46
1280
7.3
WO-11
T a
BoUrn Dept, 3.Sn
Tem C
DO(,a)
Sp.Con
Be"
M
26.2
6.3
1263
72
25.1
33
1 82
72
...nai nemess map, liar rases
WO-13
Tme
Botlom Oeptlf SOR
oepm
Sampled
0
Tem C
DO
Sp.COn
(s
S
( (00) 1
0.5
25.3
4A
1310
]5
60
25
30
1313
T6
].0
25
3.5
1312
1.5
POM area, day takes
WQidOR
Time
Botlom Depm-BOR
Depm
Sampled
Tem C
00 mNS)
Sp.Con
Salinty
hand
0.5
253
Ca
1313
7.5
4.0
HB
2.3
1313
].5
7.0
NS
22
1Ji2
].5
Chocowlnity Bay- Surface Water Quarts Slaledes
Sampled salinity
_ 8 tp.C_
Sam
WQ-12
(R Tem 'C 00 m S .Can S
Temp rcf OO�gm L� fpJ
fpQt
me
Chocovdnfty Bay -Bean 24A 2A 1360.9
7.9
Bottom Depm
SUBonY l2.moved from Sampling per W2009 DWO Repuest
Choeminity Bay -Min 24A 1.7 1299.0
7.5
ChdcowinRy Bay -Max 24.9 3.0 14412.0
8A
Bay takes -Surface Water Quality Slated'a
SalinM1v
TemprC1 DO(m9-1 fY31
I220
Bay Lake. -Mean 2fi.1 dA 1298.9
7.4
Baytakes-MN 2A6 22 126LO
7.2
Bay Lakes -Max 262 6.7 13110
7.6

2009 Ambient Water Quality Sampling
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
10/29/2009
Note: Ambient Water Quality Sampling on 10/29/2009 done in conjunction with Fish Population Study of waters in Bay Lakes
Station Station
Depth Salinity
WO-1 Sam led fl Tamp'C DO m S .Can S t
Time
Bottom Depth Station IT 1 i6ihed from Sam Iin er 612009 DWD Re Last
WO -](it)
Time
Bottom Depth- S.Oft
DepN
Sampled
Tem 'C
0. Dom
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
o t)
ON
19.1
8.3
1658
B8
2.0
19.2
7.1
1.8]9
10
1.708
10
Pond area, Bay lakes
DepN Salinity
WO-2 Sam led fl Temp (TJ DO m S .Con S t
Time
Bottom Depth Sletlon tl 2 removed from SamplingperMOO9 DWD Re oast
T
WQ-3
rare
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled ft
Tamp °C
DO m
So Can S`
Salinity
t
Gnowwlli ty stations not sampled an ion&2o09
W04
Time
Bottom Depth
Depth
Sampled fl
Tamp °C
DO m IL
Sp.Con S
Salinity
t
Chocowinity, Stations not sampled on 1012912009
WO-5
Time
Bono, Depth
Depth
Sampled to
Tamp °C
DO
5 .Con S
Salinity
!
Gnocowlmry stations not sampled on IDanzWe
WO-8
Time
Boflam Depth
DepN
Sam letl fl
Tem °C
DO m L
S .Con TS
Salinity
t
Ghocowlnity, stations not sampled on 1012912009
Depth
Salinity
WO-12 Sampled ft Temr, I'd DO m $ .Can S t
Time
Bottom Depth Station tl 12 romoyed from Sam Iin er 62009 OWQ Request
w0-9
Time
Bottom Depth- 5.5ft
Depth
Sampled
ft
Tam °C
DO(,
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
19.2
9.2
15]8
9.3
2.0
19.1
7.9
1,599
9.4
5.0
19.3
7.4
1630
9.B
Canal, Bay Laken
WO-10
Time
Bottom DeptR S.Sfl
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tamp 'C
DO m
Sp.Con
iS
Salinity
t
0.5
19.4
92
1 We
9.2
2.0
19.4
9.0
1.575
92
5.0
19.9
]J
1.598
9.4
Canal, Bay takes
WO-11
Time
Bottom Depth-5oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tam °C
DO m )
SP.Con
S
Salinity
t
1 0.51
19.6
9.1
1,5531
9.1
2.0
19.5
9.0
1556
9.1
4.0
19.5
8.8
1,560
9.1
Cana, ned,ea, n,de, say '-
11WIM0.
m Depth-B.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tam °C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t0.5
19.1
8.1
1585
9.3
4.0
19.1
8.1
- 16w
9.4
7.0
191
7.91
1,621
9.5
I.F. a,ea, oay-.e.
WO-14
Time
Sahara Depth-8.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tamp°C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.5
192
].4
1'sm
9.1
4.01
19.21
7.4
1694
9.9
T.0
19.3
].2
1 ]OS
10
retie area, say Ta.aa
WO-15
Time
Bottom Depth-12.Oft
Depth
Sampled
fl
Tam •C
DO m
Sp.Con
S
Salinity
t
0.51
19.1
8.4
1880
9.8
8.0
19.3
7.3
17401
10.'
110
19.3
7.3
1,]55
10.4
amping amadp adoe0 Tor mu sampnng date onry, locama near manner ameon p12.
In S comer or pond, Bay Lakes
Bay Lakes - Surrece Water Quality StaOstics
Simon.
Salina
TompVC1
DOfirl
i9st
leel
Chocowinity Bay -Mean WA WA WA WA
Bay Lakes - Mean 19.3
8.0
16319
9.6
Chocowinity Bay - Min WA NIA WA N/A
Bay Lakes - Min 19.0
6.7
150.0
9.1
Chowwinity Bay - Max WA NIA WA NIA
Bay Lakes - Mae 19.6
9.2
I'll"
9.11

14
13
12
J
� 11
E
C 10
N
9
X
O 8
> 7
O 5
N
y
0 5
N
R
4
L
> 3
a
2
1
0
Ambient Dissolved Oxygen
Chocowinity Bay & Bay Lakes
o� Q) o�
NA
Sample Date
October 208 2009
01-June 2007-October 2009 Sample Location
Land Management Group, Inc. •Chocowinity Bay
www.lmgroup.net }Bay Lakes
NOTE: Data points were not taken at the Chocowinity Bay location on July 31, 2009 or October 29, 2009.

Land Management Group's Standard Calibration and Use Procedures, YSI 85 meter.
Calibration, Operation and Maintenance of YSI 85
Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity, Salinity, and Temperature Meter
1.0 Calibration
Dissolved oxygen (DO) is calibrated prior to daily use to ensure accurate water quality
readings. It is recommended that DO be calibrated in situ directly prior to field sampling to
ensure that atmospheric parameters are similar during calibration and field sampling.
Conductivity does not need to be calibrated daily, however, should be calibrated to specific
concentrations based on sampling location. Salinity is based on conductivity.
Temperature is factory calibrated.
Dissolved Oxygen Calibration
a. Ensure that the sponge in the calibration chamber is damp with DI water.
b. Visually inspect the membrane for nicks, scratched and/or air bubbles. If any of these
defects are observed, the DO membrane must be replaced prior to proceeding with
calibration and field use.
C. Gently dry the surface of the DO membrane, paying attention not to nick or scratch the
surface of the membrane.
d. Insert probe into calibration chamber just so that o-ring is in.
e. Turn YSI 85 ON using ON/OFF button. Wait for initial readings to appear.
f. Press the MODE button until the dissolved oxygen is displayed in % saturation.
g. Wait for the dissolved oxygen and temperature readings to stabilize. The manufacturer
recommends approximately 15 minutes.
h. Press and release the UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW simultaneously.
I. The LCD will prompt for the local altitude in hundreds of feet.
j. Use arrow keys to adjust altitude if necessary. Press ENTER when altitude is correct.
k. The instrument should now display CAL in lower left (Calibration Mode), calibration value
in the lower right (100%), and the actual dissolved oxygen % on the main display.
I. After the instrument has equilibrated, press the ENTER button to save the reading as
100% air -saturated calibration.
m. The YSI 85 should then return to normal operation.
NOTE: It may be necessary to re -calibrate after machine has been turned off. Check instrument
regularly.
Conductivity Calibration
a. Turn instrument ON and allow initial readings to stabilize.
b. Press MODE button until conductivity is displayed.
C. Use a certified calibration solution close to sample conductivity.
50 mS/cm for seawater 10 mS/cm for brackish water 0.100 mS/cm for freshwater
d. Place at least 3 inches of solution in clean glass beaker.
Land Management Group, Inc.
YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures

e. Insert probe into the beaker deep enough to completely cover oval shaped hole on the
side of probe. Suspend probe in solution, do not rest on bottom.
f. Allow at least 60 seconds for equilibration.
g. Press and release UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW simultaneously.
h. The CAL symbol will appear at bottom left of display (Calibration Mode).
I. Use UP ARROW and DOWN ARROW to adjust reading to Standard solution conductivity.
j. When reading is exact value of standard, press ENTER button to save calibration.
k. The word SAVE will flash across display.
I. The YSI is ready for normal use.
NOTE: Conductivity does not need to be calibrated each time machine is turned on.
2.0 Operation
The YSI 85 DO membrane should be inspected for nicks, scratches and/or air bubbles
prior to use at each site. If any of the aforementioned defects are observed, the DO
membrane must be changed are re -calibrated prior to obtaining water quality readings.
At each site, physical parameters are measured at the surface, mid -depth and bottom or
until the cable connecting the handheld logger with to the water quality probe has been
fully extended. Surface samples are obtained ca. 0.1 m below the surface to assure that
the water quality probe remains submerged. Vertical profiles of field parameters should be
obtained whenever possible. However, discretion should be used in shallow areas so as
to avoid re -suspension of bottom sediment. It is important to avoid contact between the
water quality probe and bottom sediment.
The dissolved oxygen sensor on the YSI 85 does not feature a "stirring independent'
dissolved oxygen membrane. As such, the water quality probe should be gently stirred
while obtained readings to assure accuracy in the recorded data.
In waters with a notable current and/or tidal flow, a downrigger weight is utilized to assure
that the water quality probe is recording field parameters at the correct depth.
Obtaining Measurements
The temperature is always displayed on the LCD.
Use MODE key to scroll between parameters.
The following sequence represents successive modes on the LCD:
D.O. (% sat.) -) D.O. (mg/L) 4 Cond. (uS or mS 4 Specific Cond. (uS or mS) 4 Salinity (ppt)
If the instrument is displaying Specific Conductance (temp compensated conductivity), the OC will
be flashing.
Dissolved Oxygen probe must be stirred in the sample at rate of 1 fYsec to get accurate readings -
Oz consumed at tip of electrode if probe is not stirred.
Salinity is determined directly from conductivity. Salinity measurements are calculated by the
instrument using the Standard Methods algorithms, and referenced to 15 OC.
Land Management Group, Inc.
YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures

Rinse probe with DI water and store in the calibration chamber.
Upon completion of field sampling, the dissolved oxygen calibration is checked to assure that the
original field calibration is still accurate. The DO calibration is checking by gently drying the DO
_ membrane and inserting the probe into the calibration chamber just so that o-ring is in. Acceptable
readings should fall within 5% of the calibrated values lie. 95% to 105%)
3.0 Maintenance
Given that the majority of instrument use takes place during the summer months, the instrument is
maintained monthly during the off-season to assure quality assurance and control. During routine
maintenance of the YSI 85, the DO membrane is inspected for nicks, scratches and/or air bubbles.
If any of the aforementioned defects are observed, the DO membrane is changed according to
factory instructions and re -calibrated. If no defects are observed on the DO membrane, the
instrument is calibrated as usual. The sponge within the probe storage chamber is also checked
for sufficient dampness.
The YSI 85 is analyzed for accuracy at least twice yearly utilizing a 0% DO solution
available thru the manufacturer. During routine accuracy testing, the DO is calibrated and
the probe is placed in the 0% DO solution. The reading should be less then 2% DO in 3-5
minutes. If the instrument does not obtain a 2% DO reading as referenced, the instrument
is sent to the manufacturer for cleaning and/or repair.
YSI instrumentation available through the UNCW Aquatic Ecology Laboratory has also
been utilized for the comparison of field parameters on occasion.
Land Management Group, Inc.
YSI 85 Calibration and Use Procedures

36
30
24
18
12
6
0
-6
-12
-18
-24
-30
TYPICAL TIDE GUAGE COMPARISON
----------------------------------------- - BAY --- LAKE -Al --------AVG.
-IDARANGE
TIDAL = "/DAY
-- -- ----------------------------12
------.1--- -- ---------------------- ---- - - -
------------- --------------';---------- ,,H-CQWI-ITY_.BAY__#2--------AVG.
TIDAL RANGE = 14.9"/DAY
4
yy
- ---d------------------------------------
E
1
--
_ T
-
t
�Jt'
,4,CH0C VlNlTY Y #2
i Y/
�}
11.
----------- + ---------I--- ----
- 17
ZC +.jai
14
- --------------------------------------------------- - ----- ��r -
XE #1
h Q
-------------- tiG�. ®r---------------------------- t --- --- � ` .;--- -- `\\lp
:
OO` O` O` O` O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O
NA
t`
b
r F,11
-------------------------
BAY
-------------- j------------- w
PREPARED BY LMG
Tides
GUAGE#EBD9FCE
CHOCOWINITY BAY
G UAG E#A286960
BAY LAKE

NC DENR DO Model
Performed by Land Management Group, Inc.
3/2009
Bay Lakes, Chocowinity, NC
MATRIX OF DO MODELING RESULTS, Marina Basin
DISSOLVED
OXYGEN
SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND g O /m /day
mg/L
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
8.0
6.7
6.3
5.8
5.4
7.5
6.5
6.1
5.7
5.2
7.0
6.4
6.0
5.5
5.1
6.5
6.3
5.8
5.4
4.9
6.0
6.1
5.7
5.2
5.5
6.0
5.5
5.1
---
5.0
5.8
5.4
4.9
---
4.5
5.7
5.2
---
---
'Shaded values indicate a DO concentration above the State standard of 5.0 mg/L.
Model Inputs (March, 2009)
Average Channel Depth=
4 ft
Average Basin Depth (existing)= 9 ft
Channel Surface Area=
86,363 sq ft
Basin Surface Area (existing)=
674,875 sq ft
Tidal Amplitude=
1.0 ft
Sediment Oxygen Demand=
range, see above
Ambient Dissolved Oxygen=
range, see above
Saturation Dissolved Oxygen=
8.03 mg/L
Return Flow Factor-
0
Decay Coefficient=
1/day
Re -aeration Coefficient=
0.3/day
Channel Boat Activity=
0 Boat-hrs/day
Marina Boast Activity=
0 Boat-hrs/day

STATE CLIMATE OFFICE OF NORTH CAROLINA
NC CRONOS Database
Data retrieval from KOCW - Warren Field for 2007-06-01 thru 2009-10-31
882 records for this period of record (99.8% data available; 2 missing reci
Number of Records
Date
Compiled
6/1/2007
20 (83%)
6/2/2007
23 (96%)
6/3/2007
22 (92%)
6/4/2007
23 (96%)
6/5/2007
23 (96%)
6/6/2007
23 (96%)
6/7/2007
23 (96%)
6/8/2007
22 (92%)
6/9/2007
24 (100%)
6/10/2007
23 (96%)
6/11/2007
23 (96%)
6/12/2007
22 (92%)
6/13/2007
24 (100%)
6/14/2007
24 (100%)
6/15/2007
24 (100%)
6/16/2007
22 (92%)
6/17/2007
23 (96%)
6/18/2007
22 (92%)
6/19/2007
23 (96%)
6/20/2007
22 (92%)
6/21/2007
24 (100%)
6/22/2007
23 (96%)
6/23/2007
23 (96%)
6/24/2007
23 (96%)
6/25/2007
22 (92%)
6/26/2007
_ 22 (92%)
6/27/2007
23 (96%)
6/28/2007
21 (88%)
6/29/2007
23 (96%)
6/30/2007
23 (96%)
7/1/2007
24 (100%)
7/2/2007
24 (100%)
7/3/2007
24 (100%)
7/4/2007
24 (100%)
7/5/2007
22 (92%)
7/6/2007
22 (92%)
7/7/2007
24 (100%)
7/8/2007
23 (96%)
7/9/2007
24 (100%)
7/10/2007
21 (88%)
7/11/2007
21 (88%)
7/12/2007
23 (96%)
daily MAX of 10m
Wind Speed (mph)
10.1
13
21
19.9
17
11
13
11
14.1
13
8.1
10.1
15
11
11
8.1
8.1
8.1
14.1
10.1
13
10.1
6.9
13
19.9
8.9
11
13
14.1
10.1
13
10.1
6.9
8.9
13
13
16.1
10.1
10.1
11
17
6.9
daily AVG of 10m
Wind Speed (mph)
4.3
3.8
9.8
10.8
9.7
5.7
6.2
8
6
5.5
2.3
2.5
7.2
6.1
4
2.7
4.2
4.5
6.1
5.1
3.8
5.1
4.2
6
3.9
4.6
5.7
8
7.3
5.2
5.4
1.7
1.1
3.8
6
7.9
3
4.2
5.9
4.7
8.6
5.1
daily AVG of 10m Wind
Direction (degrees)
93.5
67
150.9
226.1
227.8
219.6
154.8
215.5
228.8
84.3
71.3
83.2
42.9
66.7
90.4
103.2
192.2
172.3
198.7
181.8
108.8
171.7
89.6
95.2
116.4
147.7
159.6
211.9
213.5
196.5
58.8
19.6
27.5
111.7
145.5
205.9
80.8
129.1
185.8
153.8
174.3
232.5

1I-
7/13/2007
21 (88%)
7/14/2007
22 (92%)
7/15/2007
24 (100%)
7/16/2007
22 (92%)
7/17/2007
20 (83%)
7/18/2007
23 (96%)
7/19/2007
24 (100%)
7/20/2007
24 (100%)
7/21/2007
23 (96%)
7/22/2007
24 (100%)
7/23/2007
22 (92%)
7/24/2007
23 (96%)
7/25/2007
20 (83%)
7/26/2007
20 (83%)
7/27/2007
14 (58%)
7/28/2007
10 (42%)
7/29/2007
17 (71 %)
7/30/2007
20 (83%)
7/31/2007
22 (92%)
11
5
43.6
8/l/2007
21 (88%)
8.9
3
94.8
8/2/2007
20 (83%)
8.9
3.2
60
8/3/2007
19 (79%)
8.1
2.9
87.9
8/4/2007
16 (67%)
6
3.3
136.9
8/5/2007
20 (83%)
8.9
5.6
178.5
8/6/2007
20 (83%)
8.9
5.5
176
8/7/2007
18 (75%)
8.1
5.3
173.9
8/8/2007
22 (92%)
8.1
5.6
210.9
8/9/2007
22 (92%)
10.1
5.5
194.1
8/10/2007
19 (79%)
11
6.6
187.9
8/11/2007
18 (75%)
8.9
4.5
40.6
8/12/2007
14 (58%)
4.9
2.1
61.4
8/13/2007
21 (88%)
8.1
2.5
95.2
8/14/2007
16 (67%)
8.1
4.5
185
8/15/2007
19 (79%)
8.1
3.1
76.8
8/16/2007
16 (67%)
13
8.7
197.5
8/17/2007
19 (79%)
11
7.6
196.3
8/18/2007
20 (83%)
13
6.3
120.5
8/19/2007
20 (83%)
11
6
133
8/20/2007
22 (92%)
14.1
9
208.6
8/21/2007
19 (79%)
17
8.2
227.4
8/22/2007
19 (79%)
8.1
2.9
45.8
8/23/2007
17 (71 %)
6.9
3.6
74.7
8/24/2007
20 (83%)
8.9
3.2
89
8/25/2007
16 (67%)
8.1
5.7
213.1
8/26/2007
20 (83%)
10.1
3.3
126.5
8/27/2007
18 (75%)
11
2.6
70
8/28/2007
19 (79%)
11
5.1
87.9
8/29/2007
22 (92%)
6.9
3.5
33.6
8/30/2007
16 (67%)
8.1
3
69.4
8/31/2007
15 (63%)
6.9
2.4
61.3
9/l/2007
20 (83%)
11
4.9
27.5
9/2/2007
20 (83%)
14.1
6.3
118.5

9/3/2007
20 (83%)
10.1.
3.1 .
71.5
9/4/2007
19 (79%)
6.9
2
34.2
9/5/2007
16 (67%)
8.9
3
98.1
9/6/2007
19 (79%)
13
4.3
75.3
9/7/2007
22 (92%)
13
3.7
83.2
9/8/2007
20 (83%)
10.1
5.1
61
_ 9/9/2007
20 (83%)
15
8.7
253.5
9/10/2007
23 (96%)
10.1
6.2
202.6
9/11/2007
16 (67%)
17
9.9
216.9
9/12/2007
19 (79%)
9.2
4.3
143.2
9/13/2007
21 (88%)
19.6
7.6
97.1
9/14/2007
14 (58%)
14.1
7.4
127.1
9/15/2007
17 (71 %)
11
6.9
147.6
9/16/2007
18 (75%)
14.1
6.9
103.3
9/17/2007
19 (79%)
15
7.8
105.8
9/18/2007
22 (92%)
16.1
8.8
130.5
9/19/2b07
17 (71 %)
14.1
8.7
185.3
9/20/2007
17 (71 %)
8.9
6.1
50.6
9/21/2007
21 (88%)
10.1
5.2
68.1
9/22/2007
18 (75%)
6.9
2.1
110.6
9/23/2007
20 (83%)
8.1
2.6
37
9/24/2007
21 (88%)
8.1
2.3
41
9/25/2007
21 (88%)
6
2.4
71
9/26/2007
17(71%)
6.9
2.4
66.5
9/27/2007
19 (79%)
8.1
2.6
84.7
9/28/2007
20 (83%)
10.1
5.7
270
9/29/2007
19 (79%)
13
5.5
137.9
9/30/2007
23 (96%)
15
7.9
94.8
10/l/2007
18 (75%)
14.1
7.3
42.2
10/2/2007
17 (71 %)
10.1
6.5
50
10/3/2007
20 (83%)
8.1
3.2
45.5
10/4/2007
18 (75%)
8.9
4.1
43.9
10/5/2007
19 (79%)
8.9
4.9
46.8
10/6/2007
21 (88%)
8.1
3.8
59
10/7/2007
18 (75%)
6
1.8
93.9
10/8/2007
15 (63%)
8.1
3
120
10/9/2007
20 (83%)
8.9
5.4
210.5
10/10/2007
16 (67%)
8.9
4
168.1
10/11/2007
19 (79%)
14.1
6.5
27
10/12/2007
21 (88%)
10.1
3
181
10/13/2007
22 (92%)
10.1
2.5
105.5
10/14/2007
18 (75%)
8.1
2.7
155.6
10/15/2007
18 (75%)
8.1
3.1
63.9
10/16/2007
20 (83%)
6
1
31
10/17/2007
19 (79%)
6
1.6
50
10/18/2007
19 (79%)
15
4.5
97.9
10/19/2007
19 (79%)
13.8
6.4
150
10/20/2007
19 (79%)
10.1
4.7
185.8
10/21/2007
22 (92%)
8.1
2.4
45.9
10/22/2007
23 (96%)
10.1
3.2
63.9
10/23/2007
24 (100%)
16.1
6.4
141.3
10/24/2007
20 (83%)
16.1
6.5
146.5

10/25/2007
18 (75%)
8.9
4.4
70
10/26/2007
15 (63%)
9.2
4.2
90
10/27/2007
13 (54%)
8.1
4.2
209.2
10/28/2007
19 (79%)
14.1
7.1
207.4
10129/2007
18 (75%)
17
6.1
155.6
10/30/2007
17 (71 %)
6.9
1.7
37.6
10/31/2007
21 (88%)
10.1
3
45.2
11/1/2007
20 (83%)
13
3
71
11/2/2007
19 (79%)
23
14.5
176.8
11/3/2007
18 (75%)
16.1
6.8
214.4
11 /4/2007
17 (71 %)
8.1
1.3
37.6
11 /5/2007
17 (71 %)
9.2
3.1
134.7
11/6/2007
18 (75%)
14.1
7.3
264.4
11/7/2007
18 (75%)
10.1
3.3
164.4
11/8/2007
16 (67%)
8.1
2.4
113.1
11/9/2007
15 (63%)
4.9
1.1
58.7
11/10/2007
18 (75%)
14.1
5.7
228.9
11/11/2007
21 (88%)
13
3.1
111.9
11/12/2007
18 (75%)
11
3.4
112.8
11113/2007
15 (63%)
13
3.5
125.3
11/14/2007
20 (83%)
8.1
4.2
154.5
11/15/2007
20 (83%)
17
6.9
213
11/16/2007
21 (88%)
13.8
4.5
179
11/17/2007
20 (83%)
8.1
3.1
108
11/18/2007
22 (92%)
8.1
1.5
101.8
11/19/2007
19 (79%)
5.8
2.3
112.6
11/20/2007
18 (75%)
11
2.8
87.2
11/21/2007
17 (71%)
14.1
6.3
160.6
11/22/2007
16 (67%)
19.9
10.3
208.8
11/23/2007
19 (79%)
15
8.3
210
11/24/2007
21 (88%)
11
5.4
109
11/25/2007
19 (79%)
6.9
2.3
24.7
11/26/2007
21 (88%)
10.4
4.6
103.8
11/27/2007
18 (75%)
16.1
5.9
223.9
11/28/2007
15 (63%)
11
4.7
49.3
11/29/2007
21 (88%)
.8.9
1.9
77.1
11/30/2007
17(71%)
9.2
2.9
47.1
12/1/2007
16 (67%)
10.1
3.3
17.5
12/2/2007
22 (92%)
8.1
2.2
57.3
12/3/2007
17 (71 %)
17.9
12.1
272.4
1214/2007
18 (75%)
13
6.1
207.2
12/5/2007
21 (88%)
11.5
3.5
106.7
1216/2007
20 (83%)
19.9
9.1
149,
1217/2007
17 (71 %)
4.9
0.7
31.2
12/8/2007
23 (96%)
8.9
1
23.5
12/9/2007
18 (75%)
4.6
0.3
12.8
12/10/2007
19 (79%)
14.1
2.6
74.7
12/11/2007
19 (79%)
0
0
0
12/12/2007
23 (96%)
17.9
6.4
147.8
12/13/2007
18 (75%)
15
7
120
12/14/2007
15 (63%)
8.1
3.2
109.3
12/15/2007
22 (92%)
13
7.4
35.5

12/16/2007
19 (79%)
19.9
9.7
198.9
12/17/2007
20 (83%)
11.5
5.8
202
12/18/2007
17 (71 %)
4.9
0.9
37.1
12/19/2007
18 (75%)
11
2.8
85.6
12/20/2007
20 (83%)
6.9
1.9
43.5
12/21/2007
16 (67%)
13
8.7
39.4
12/22/2007
20 (83%)
15
9.2
43.5
12/23/2007
17 (71 %)
16.1
7.7
129.4
12/24/2007
19 (79%)
8.1
3.1
146.8
12/25/2007
15 (63%)
8.1
5.3
36.7
12/26/2007
20 (83%)
20.7
9.9
198.5
12/27/2007
15 (63%)
8.1
1.1
50
12/28/2007
19 (79%)
13
4.7
7
90
185.2
12/29/2007
21 (88%)
14.1
12/30/2007
22 (92%)
10.1
4.3
49.5
12/31/2007
21 (88%)
17.9
2.8
100
1/l/2008
18 (75%)
11
4.6
188.3
1/2/2008
19 (79%)
15
8.8
296.3
1/3/2008
20 (83%)
19.9
8.5
253.5
1/4/2008
17 (71 %)
10.1
1.8
69.4
1/5/2008
19 (79%)
13
3.8
142.6
1/6/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
3.5
132.2
1/7/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
2.5
107.7
1/8/2008
18 (75%)
13
4.2
121.7
1/9/2008
19 (79%)
21
6.6
159.5
1/10/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
4.7
78.3
1/11/2008
21 (88%)
14.1
8.4
169
1/12/2008
20 (83%)
8.9
5
78.5
1/13/2008
14 (58%)
8.9
5.8
91.4
1/14/2008
15 (63%)
6.9
2.5
158.7
1/15/2008
18 (75%)
13
4.1
146.1
1/16/2008
21 (88%)
8.9
2.6
149
1/17/2008
16 (67%)
10.1
7.2
116.3
1/18/2008
18 (75%)
8.1
4.4
193.3
1/19/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
4.3
208.7
1/20/2008
20 (83%)
15
7.1
299.5
1/21/2008
20 (83%)
8.9
4.1
95.5
1/22/2008
16 (67%)
13
3
96.3
1/23/2008
19 (79%)
6.9
3.8
186.3
1/24/2008
22 (92%)
13
4.7
192.3
1/25/2008
20 (83%)
13
5.2
203
1/26/2008
16 (67%)
2.4
0.2
13.1
1/27/2008
21 (88%)
10.1
3.8
162.9
1/28/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
3.3
151.7
1/29/2008
19 (79%)
15
8.4
193.2
1/30/2008
19 (79%)
17.9
9.7
192.6
1/31/2008
19 (79%)
15
8.8
52.6
2/l/2008
22 (92%)
19.9
11.1
172.3
2/2/2008
23 (96%)
6.9
2.6
104.8
2/3/2008
21 (88%)
6.9
1.7
114.8
2/4/2008
15 (63%)
0
0
0
2/5/2008
17 (71 %)
17
6.9
174.1

2/6/2008
16(67%)
21
11.9
211.3
2/7/2008
19 (79%)
21
9.3
171.1
2/8/2008
19 (79%)
8.1
2
104.2
2/9/2008
18 (75%)
15
6.3
155
2/10/2008
16 (67%)
23.9
15
261.3
2/11/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
3.6
160.6
2/12/2008
19 (79%)
17.9
8.4
119.5
2113/2008
17 (71 %)
19.9
12.1
235.9
2/14/2008
16 (67%)
11
3.9
156.3
2/15/2008
16 (67%)
11
5.6
175
2/16/2008
20 (83%)
13
6.5
45
2/17/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
5.7
96.1
2/18/2008
14 (58%)
21
11.8
233.6
2/19/2008
19 (79%)
21.9
7.6
194.2
2/20/2008
20 (83%)
17.9
7.9
135
2/21/2008
21 (88%)
13
8.1
61.4
2/22/2008
20 (83%)
8.9
5.8
190
2/23/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
5.5
205
2/24/2008
19 (79%)
8.1
4.6
53.7
2/25/2008
21 (88%)
6.9
1.4
54.3
2/26/2008
18 (75%)
16.1
6.6
145.6
2/27/2008
11 (46%)
13
8.2
291.8
2/28/2008
15 (63%)
14.1
4.4
170
2/29/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
4.8
105
3/1/2008
23 (96%)
17
9.5
210.9
3/2/2008
14 (58%)
8.1
4.3
82.1
3/3/2008
19 (79%)
13
6.7
136.8
3/4/2008
17 (71 %)
17
11
161.2
_
3/5/2008
19 (79%)
15
7.4
197.4
- 3/6/2008
18 (75%)
11
3.6
58.3
3/7/2008
21 (88%)
19.9
7.5
111.4
3/8/2008
14 (58%)
33.1
18.5
217.9
3/9/2008
14 (58%)
14.1
5.8
231.4
3/10/2008
15 (63%)
6.9
3
72.7
- 3/11/2008
16 (67%)
6.9
2.4
71.9
3/12/2008
17 (71 %)
11
5
178.2
3/13/2008
20 (83%)
13
4.7
115.5
3/14/2008
17(71%)
17.9
8.6
197.6
3/15/2008
13 (54%)
15
8.9
195.4
3/16/2008
20 (83%)
14.1
7.1
218
3/17/2008
20 (83%)
14.1
6.8
130.5
3/18/2008
13 (54%)
10.1
5.5
95.4
3/19/2008
13 (54%)
21
13.7
193.8
3/20/2008
12 (50%)
21.9
i3.4
263.3
3/21/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
4.7
183.3
3/22/2008
20 (83%)
21
10.9
186.5
3/23/2008
19 (79%)
13
6.8
82.1
3/24/2008
17(71%)
15
8.2
211.8
3/25/2008
13 (54%)
8.1
6.4
279.2
3/26/2008
15 (63%)
17
11
218
3/27/2008
17 (71 %)
14.1
9.6
208.8
3/28/2008
13 (54%)
19.9
10.9
216.2

3/29/2008
14 (58%)
16.1
9.3
46.4
3/30/2008
18 (75%)
15
8.9
43.9
3/31/2008
15 (63%)
13
7.3
113.3
4/1/2008
17 (71 %)
11
8
183.5
4/2/2008
15 (63%)
15
8.2
125.3
4/3/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
7.5
79.4
4/4/2008
17 (71%)
17
7.5
153.5
4/5/2008
17 (71 %)
10.1
5.5
144.7
4/6/2008
20 (83%)
13
7.4
135
4/7/2008
14 (58%)
13
8.6
69.3
4/8/2008
12 (50%)
11
9.4
183.3
4/9/2008
13 (54%)
8.9
5.5
129.2
4/10/2008
17 (71 %)
8.1
2.7
59.4
4/11/2008
15 (63%)
13
6.4
148
4/12/2008
10 (42%)
17.9
112
221
4/13/2008
19 (79%)
13
8.4
260
4/14/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
3.4
85.6
4/15/2008
20 (83%)
16.1
7.9
170
4/16/2008
19 (79%)
15
6.3
134.7
4/17/2008
22 (92%)
11
2.8
147.7
4/18/2008
15 (63%)
8.9
4.7
176
4/19/2008
17 (71 %)
11
7
184.7
4/20/2008
20 (83%)
17.9
9.9
156.5
4/21/2008
16 (67%)
11
4.3
133.1
4/22/2008
13 (54%)
14.1
8.8
34.6
4/23/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
7.9
32.8
4/24/2008
13 (54%)
6.9
3
101.5
4/25/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
4.1
183.8
4/26/2008
18 (75%)
10.1 _
6.7
215.6
4/27/2008
15 (63%)
13
3.7
52
4/28/2008
17 (71 %)
11
8.4
191.2
4/29/2008
18 (75%)
13
5.7
215.6
4/30/2008
16 (67%)
8.9
3
201.9
5/l/2008
16 (67%)
14.1
6.2
133.1
5/2/2008
17 (71 %)
15
9
204.7
5/3/2008
20 (83%)
16.1
9.2
198.5
5/4/2008
20 (83%)
11
5.4
165.5
5/5/2008
20 (83%)
13
5.6
41.5
5/6/2008
18 (75%)
8.1
3.7
113.3
5/7/2008
19 (79%)
13
6.5
174.7
5/8/2008
17 (71 %)
14.1
8.8
202.4
5/9/2008
15 (63%)
15
9.4
183.3
5/10/2008
8 (33%)
16.1
8.4
146.3
5/11/2008
13 (54%)
17
7.9
108.5
5/12/2008
11 (46%)
16.1
10.5
301.8
5/13/2008
21 (88%)
21
9
200
5/14/2008
22 (92%)
11
4.6
161.4
5/15/2008
16 (67%)
16.1
6.7
180.6
5/16/2008
17 (71 %)
17
8.3
235.3
5/17/2008
19 (79%)
14.1
7.2
245.8
5/18/2008
24 (100%)
21.9
11.2
224.6
5/19/2008
14 (58%)
15
7.2
197.1

5/20/2008
16 (67%)
21
10.2
156.9
5/21/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
3.4
131.6
5/22/2008
19 (79%)
13
4.1
139.5
_- 5/23/2008
12 (50%)
6.9
2.2
55
5/24/2008
14 (58%)
8.9
3.6
145
5/25/2008
14 (58%)
6.9
2.6
128.6
5/26/2008
21 (88%)
14.1
6.5
162.4
5/27/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
8.8
207.8
5/28/2008
17 (71 %)
14.1
7.3
95.3
5/29/2008
12 (50%)
8.1
4.1
70.8
5/30/2008
1 (4%)
6.9
6.9
150
5/31/2008
9 (38%)
14.1
10.5
200
6/l/2008
20 (83%)
10.1
5.7
206.5
6/2/2008
20 (83%)
11
5.5
173.5
6/3/2008
16 (67%)
10.1
5.7
126.9
6/4/2008
20 (83%)
16.1
10.5
212
6/5/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
7
187.3
-
6/6/2008
17(71%)
15
4.9
166.5
-, 6/7/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
5.6
224.8
6/8/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
5.6
210
6/9/2008
21 (88%)
10.1
3.7
176.2
6/10/2008
21 (88%)
8.9
6.5
207.1
6/11/2008
20 (83%)
10.1
5.4
122.5
6/12/2008
21 (88%)
8.9
4.2
99.5
- 6/13/2008
18 (75%)
11
3.4
68.3
6/14/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
4.7
130.5
6/15/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
4.4
179.1
6/16/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
5.9
177.4
6/17/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
6.1
249.1
6/18/2008
23 (96%)
11
4.8
155.2
6/19/2008
20 (83%)
14.1
4.3
175.5
6/20/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
3.5
152.7
6/21/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
3.7
57.4
6/22/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
5.8
152.6
6/23/2008
24 (100%)
13
5.5
147.5
6/24/2008
19 79%
( )
8.9
3.5
132.1
6/25/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
3.7
114.2
6/26/2008
22 (92%)
17
9.8
215.5
6/27/2008
16 (67%)
16.1
9.5
218.8
6/28/2008
18 (75%)
15
10.2
208.3
6/29/2008
16 (67%)
16.1
10
206.3
6/30/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
7.3
189.4
7/l/2008
21 (88%)
11
4
146.7
.7/2/2008
22 (92%)
13
4.6
154.5
7/3/2008
21 (88%)
11
6.2
160
7/4/2008
23 (96%)
14.1
8.1
204.8
7/5/2008
20 (83%)
11
6.1
146.5
7/6/2008
22 (92%)
16.1
7
164.1
7/7/2008
21 (88%)
13
7
192.4
7/8/2008
19 (79%)
17.9
7.5
193.2
7/9/2008
14 (58%)
8.9
6.3
192.9
7/10/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
5.6
203.9

7/11/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
3.6
81.1
7/12/2008
20 (83%)
13
5.7
29.5
_
7/13/2008
18 (75%)
8.1
3.7
112.8
_ 7/14/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
5
194.2
7/15/2008
20 (83%)
10.1
5.2
120.5
7/16/2008
19 (79%)
14.1
5.5
166.3
7/17/2008
21 (88%)
10.4
5.1
99
7/18/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
4.8
63.3
7/19/2008
17 (71 %)
14.1
2.9
48.8
7/20/2008
19 (79%)
14.1
7.7
38.4
7/21/2008
18 (75%)
8.1
4.3
210
7/22/2008
14 (58%)
15
4.3
102.1
7/23/2008
16 (67%)
11
3.5
107.5
-- 7/24/2008
20 (83%)
6
1.8
103.5
7/25/2008
22 (92%)
8.1
2.5
73.6
7/26/2008
20 (83%)
8.9
2.6
97
7/27/2008
20 (83%)
14.1
5.4
168.5
_
7/28/2008
20 (83%)
6.9
2.4
147.5
7/29/2008
19 (79%)
11
5
151.1
7/30/2008
22 (92%)
13
7.2
210.9
7/31/2008
20 (83%)
8.9
5.4
192
8/l/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
3.3
191.9
8/2/2008
21 (88%)
17
6.8
178.1
8/3/2008
22 (92%)
8.1
3.4
202.3
8/4/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
2.7
109.6
8/5/2008
21 (88%)
6
2.6
149.5
8/6/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
2.9
137.9
8/7/2008
19 (79%)
8.1
3.7
175.8
8/8/2008
19 (79%)
8.1
3.7
190
8/9/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
4.6
84.2
8/10/2008
23 (96%)
11
4.9
163.9
8/11/2008
21 (88%)
8.9
4
168.1
8/12/2008
24 (100%)
6
2.4
94.6
8/13/2008
20 (83%)
6.9
2.1
64
8/14/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
2.9
99.5
8/15/2008
20 (83%)
10.1
2.1 .
68.5
8/16/2008
22 (92%)
6
2
92.7
8/17/2008
22 (92%)
8.1
2.4
51.8
8/18/2008
19 (79%)
11
3.5
50.5
8/19/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
3
103.3
8/20/2008
21 (88%)
13
4.4
43.8
8/21/2008
22 (92%)
13
6.1
46.4
8/22/2008
22 (92%)
14.1
6.5
50
8/23/2008
18 (75%)
13
6.7
60.6
8/24/2008
22 (92%)
6.9
2.6
45.9
8/25/2008
18 (75%)
8.1
3.1
125
8/26/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
4
45.3
8/27/2008
19 (79%)
10.1
6.8
85.8
8/28/2008
20 (83%)
8.1
3.4
80
-- 8/29/2008
22 (92%)
6.9
1.4
48.2
8/30/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
2.3
118.2
_
8/31/2008
21 (88%)
11
5
52.4

9/1/2008
21 (88%)
13
4.8
36.7
9/2/2008
23 (96%)
8.1
1.6
103
9/3/2008
22 (92%)
8.1
2.8
119.5
9/4/2008
20 (83%)
11
3.5
99.5
9/5/2008
22 (92%)
17
6.4
60.9
9/6/2008
24 (100%)
29.1
15.9
187.9
9/7/2008
20 (83%)
6.9
1.2
71.5
9/8/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
3.6
51.4
9/9/2008
23 (96%)
8.9
3.3
127
9/10/2008
21 (88%)
6.9
2.3
61.4
9/11/2008
24 (100%)
10.1
4.5
53.8
9/12/2008
21 (88%)
6
1.3
52.9
9/13/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
4.3
181.4
9/14/2008
22 (92%)
14.1
7.2
186.8
9/15/2608
21 (88%)
8.9
6
249.5
_
9/16/2008
19 (79%)
15
5.8
106.3
9/17/2008
21 (88%)
10.1
5.5
130.5
9/18/2008
19 (79%)
13
5.9
156.3
9/19/2008
22 (92%)
17
10.7
41.8
9/20/2008
24 (100%)
11
8.1
256.3
9/21/2008
23 (96%)
8.9
3.8
79.6
9/22/2008
23 (96%)
13
7.5
107
9/23/2008
22 (92%)
19.9
12.3
49.5
9/24/2008
18 (75%)
23
14.9
90.6
9/25/2008
20 (83%)
21.9
16.3
72.5
9/26/2008
21 (88%)
11
6
88.1
9/27/2008
19 (79%)
6
1.5
58.9
9/28/2008
21 (88%)
6.9
2.6
135.2
9/29/2008
20 (83%)
6.9
2.8
114.5
9/30/2008
23 (96%)
8.1
2.8
73.9
10/l/2008
22 (92%)
8.1
1.5
90.5
10/2/2008
18 (75%)
8.9
3.7
196.1
10/3/2008
18 (75%)
6.9
1.9
77.8
10/4/2008
20 (83%)
6
1.3
62.5
10/5/2008
18 (75%)
4.9
0.7
21.7
10/6/2008
22 (92%)
11
2.7
93.2
10/7/2008
21 (88%)
11
4.4
54.8
10/8/2008
14 (58%)
4.9
0.4
11.4
_
10/9/2008
19 (79%)
8.9
0.8
14.7
10/16/2008
19 (79%)
13
6.3
42.1
10/11/2008
18 (75%)
15
10
38.9
10/12/2008
20 (83%)
15
8.7
42
10/13/2008
17 (71 %)
6
1.6
87.1
10/14/2008
15 (63%)
4.9
0.7
47.3
10/15/2008
15 (63%)
6
0.7
22
10/16/2008
18 (75%)
13
3
104.4
10/17/2008
18 (75%)
11
5.3
45.6
10/18/2008
18 (75%)
17
9.6
351.1
10/19/2008
17 (71 %)
17
8.9
246.5
10/20/2008
22 (92%)
6.9
2
134.1
10/21/2008
21 (88%)
13
5.3
215.7
10/22/2008
19 (79%)
17
5.8
173.7

10/23/2008
19 (79%)
13
7.7
82.6
10/24/2008
18 (75%)
15
6.8
61.7
10/25/2008
21 (88%)
17
8.4
179.5
10/26/2008
21 (88%)
6
1.4
70
10/27/2008
21 (88%)
19.9
6
201
10/28/2008
20 (83%)
16.1
8.7
264.5
10/29/2008
22 (92%)
17.9
7.2
182.3
10/30/2008
18 (75%)
15
4.2
152.2
10/31/2008
21 (88%)
6
1.2
85.2
11/1/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
1.9
74.8
11/2/2008
23 (96%)
8.1
3.6
43.5
11/3/2008
24 (100%)
14.1
9.2
32.9
11/4/2008
21 (88%)
15
10.1
45.7
-- 11/5/2008
18 (75%)
17
11.6
339.4
11/6/2008
23 (96%)
14.1
6.5
267
11/7/2008
21 (88%)
6
1.9
108.1
11/8/2008
23 (96%)
13
6
196.1
_
11/9/2008
21 (88%)
10.1
1.9
58.1
11/10/2008
24 (100%)
8.1
1.9
100
11/11/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
3.6
68.6
11/12/2008
19 (79%)
6.9
3.6
66.3
11/13/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
4.8
103.6
11/14/2008
19 (79%)
6
1.7
47.9
11/15/2008
24 (100%)
29.1
11.5
205.4
11/16/2008
22 (92%)
13
5.7
190.9
_-
11/17/2008
23 (96%)
6
1.7
110.4
11/18/2008
18 (75%)
16.1
6.4
286.1
11/19/2008
20 (83%)
18.4
5.5
235
11/20/2008
16 (67%)
13.8
6.3
249.4
11/21/2008
16 (67%)
15
6.8
295.6
11/22/2008
13 (54%)
8.1
2.8
138.5
11/23/2008
10 (42%)
8.1
1.8
79
11 /24/2008
5 (21 %)
9.2
2.8
70
11/25/2008
10 (42%)
16.1
7.1
249
11/26/2008
13 (54%)
8.1
2.8
118.5
11/27/2008
14 (58%)
8.1
1.6
56.4
-' 11/28/2008
18 (75%)
6.9
2.9
137.2
11/29/2008
21 (88%)
11.5
5
34.8
11/30/2008
18 (75%)
12.7
2.9
67.8
12/1/2008
23(96%)
25.1
13.2
227.8
12/2/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
3.5
135.2
12/3/2008
22 (92%)
4.9
1.6
72.7
12/4/2008
24 (100%)
15
4.9
132.9
12/5/2008
17 (71 %)
11
3.1
69.4
12/6/2008
21 (88%)
8.1
2.6
84.8
12/7/2008
22 (92%)
16.1
5.8
188.6
12/8/2008
20 (83%)
6
1
40.5
12/9/2008
16 (67%)
10.1
5.6
113.8
12/10/2008
20 (83%)
11
7
169
12/11/2008
20 (83%)
16.1
8.2
140.5
12/12/2008
20 (83%)
17.9
9.5
269
12/13/2008
22 (92%)
8.9
3.5
190.9

12/14/2008
23 (96%)
10.1
5.4
89.1
12/15/2008
22 (92%)
11
6.8
153.6
12/16/2008
18 (75%)
14.1
4.8
68.9
12/17/2008
22 (92%)
13
2
63.2
12/18/2008
22 (92%)
10.1
3.7
60.5
12/19/2008
21 (88%)
15
7.5
151.9
12/20/2008
18 (75%)
10.1
7.3
168.3
12/21/2008
20 (83%)
17.9
7.8
226.5
12/22/2008
22 (92%)
16.1
8.5
249.1
12/23/2008
17 (71 %)
6
1.9
51.8
12/24/2008
20 (83%)
14.1
6.8
133.5
12/25/2008
19 (79%)
16.1
6.7
165.3
12/26/2008
21 (88%)
8.9
4.6
31.9
12/27/2008
22 (92%)
4.9
0.2
6.8
12/28/2008
3 (13%)
6
3.7
130
12/29/2008
missing missing
missing
missing
12/30/2008
missing missing
missing
missing
12/31/2008
5 (21%)
12.7
10.1
322
1/l/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
3.5
140
1/2/2009
23 (96%)
10.4
4
157
1/312009
22 (92%)
5.8
1.5
50.9
1/4/2009
23 (96%)
6.9
1.9
101.3
1/5/2009
21 (88%)
11.5
5.7
197.1
1/6/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
4.1
70.5
1/7/2009
19 (79%)
26.5
16.3
215.3
1/8/2009
20 (83%)
15
9.1
253.5
1/9/2009
21 (88%)
6.9
3.5
181.4
1/10/2009
18 (75%)
15
8.1
152.2
1/11/2009
20 (83%)
13,8
9
175
1/12/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
4.7
101.6
1/13/2009
13 (54%)
8.1
4.7
188.5
1/14/2009
20 (83%)
6,9
2.9
163
1/15/2009
20 (83%)
11.5
7
250.5
1/16/2009
22 (92%)
12.7
5.7
295.5
1/17/2009
21 (88%)
5.8
2.7
92.4
1/18/2009
21 (88%)
9.2
5.3
191
1/19/2009
21 (88%)
10.4
3.2
119.5
1/20/2009
22 (92%)
16.1
7.8
167.3
1/21/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
3
151.9
1/22/2009
24 (100%)
10.4
5.3
182.1
1/23/2009
20 (83%)
12.7
6.3
202
1/24/2009
20 (83%)
10.4
6
178.5
1/25/2009
23 (96%)
9.2
6.6
30.9
1/26/2009
20 (83%)
6.9
3.8
63
1/27/2009
20 (83%)
5.8
3.5
67
1/28/2009
19 (79%)
23
8.4
147.4
1/29/2009
14 (58%)
8.1
3.1
103.6
1130/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
2.8
157.9
1/31/2009
22 (92%)
13.8
5
151.8
2/l/2009
22 (92%)
19.6
8.6
209.5
2/2/2009
19 (79%)
12.7
5.1
177.4
2/3/2009
15 (63%)
13.8
8.2
267.3

2/4/2009
23 (96%)
17.3
8.3
274.8
2/5/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
5.7
224.3
2/6/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
3.8
110.9
2/7/2009
21 (88%)
10.4
6.3
183.3
2/8/2009
23 (96%)
13.8
7.6
201.3
2/9/2009
20 (83%)
10.4
4.8
100.5
2/10/2009
15 (63%)
13.8
5.4
126
2/11/2009
19 (79%)
21.9
10.9
144.7
2/12/2009
20 (83%)
24.2
14.8
258.5
2/13/2009
20 (83%)
11.5
5.6
203
2/14/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
4.7
149.1
2/15/2009
22 (92%)
13.8
7.2
91.8
2/16/2009
21 (88%)
15
8.1
258.6
2/17/2009
21 (88%)
6.9
2.7
172.9
2/18/2009
17 (71 %)
16.1
8.3
182.9
2/19/2009
21 (88%)
15
9.5
250
2/20/2009
22 (92%)
12.7
6
202.7
2/21/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
3.7
94.8
2/22/2009
20 (83%)
20.7
9.1
246.5
2/23/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
6
278.6
2/24/2009
24 (100%)
13.8
4.3
236.7
2/25/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
2.5
62.3
2/26/2009
22 (92%)
9.2
2.1
80.9
2/27/2009
19 (79%)
15
8.2
162.6
2/28/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
6.5
85.7
_
3/1/2009
22 (92%)
16.1
8.7
159.1
3/2/2009
21 (88%)
20.7
9.6.
212.4
3/3/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
7
242.4
3/4/2009
19 (79%)
4.6
1.2
67.9
3/5/2009
17 (71 %)
11.5
4.5
128.2
3/6/2009
23 (96%)
21.9
10.1
192.6
3/7/2009
19 (79%)
11.5
7.3
211.6
3/8/2009
22 (92%)
18.4
11
221.4
3/9/2009
22 (92%)
16.1
9.3
191.8
3/10/2009
22 (92%)
12.7
7.3
93.2
3/11/2009
18 (75%)
15
7.4
192.8
3/12/2009
21 (88%)
15
9.8
106.2
3/13/2009
18 (75%)
11.5
8.5
125
3/14/2009
21 (88%)
10.4
6
62.9
3/15/2009
17 (71 %)
5.8
1
50.6
3/16/2009
19 (79%)
6.9
2
28.9
3/17/2009
22 (92%)
13.8
7.1
195.5
3/18/2009
22 (92%)
6.9
1.5
45
3/19/2009
16 (67%)
12.7
4.6
3/20/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
8.4
171.9
3/21/2009
15(63%)
11.5
4.9
102
3/22/2009
22 (92%)
6.9
2
85.5
3/23/2009
19 (79%)
12.7
4.1
84.7
3/24/2009
21 (88%)
11.5
6.5
54.3
3/25/2009
20 (83%)
8.1
4.1
67
3/26/2009
19 (79%)
11.5
6
140.5
3/27/2009
21 (88%)
9.2
3.4
110

3/28/2009
19 (79%)
17.3
4.5
117.9
3/29/2009
18 (75%)
28.8
13.9
222.8
3/30/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
7.1
216.2
3/31/2009
22 (92%)
10.4
5.2
95.5
4/l/2009
23 (96%)
9.2
3.4
66.5
4/2/2009
23 (96%)
11.5
3.3
63
4/3/2009
22 (92%)
27.6
14.2
229.1
4/4/2009
21 (88%)
17.3
8.1
223.3
4/5/2009
20 (83%)
11.5
5.8
102
4/6/2009
22 (92%)
17.3
10.3
232.3
4/7/2009
23 (96%)
16.1
9.2
269.1
4/8/2009
18 (75%)
15
7.6
212.2
_
4/9/2009
16 (67%)
11.5
5.5
184.4
4/10/2009
.18 (75%)
20.7
10
181.1
4/11/2009
20 (83%)
16.1
10
266
4/12/2009
23 (96%)
13.8
4.5
101.7
4/13/2009
24 (100%)
12.7
4.6
69.6
4/14/2009
23 (96%)
12.7
4.3
124.3
4/15/2009
23 (96%)
13.8
8.3
290.9
4/16/2009
13 (54%)
20.7
12.1
200.8
4/17/2009
22 (92%)
6.9
3
163.2
4/18/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
7.5
232.4
4/19/2009
20 (83%)
10.4
5.6
175.5
4/20/2009
20 (83%)
18.4
9.1
175
4/21/2009
20 (83%)
16.1
6.1
147
_
4/22/2009
19 (79%)
24.2
9.1
177.4
4/23/2009
20 (83%)
13.8
6.9
211
4/24/2009
19 (79%)
9.2
5.3
126.8
4/25/2009
20 (83%)
12.7
8.7
200.5
4/26/2009
19 (79%)
11.5
6.8
221.1
4/27/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
4.2
144.7
4/28/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
5.6
167.6
4/29/2009
18 (75%)
11.5
6.5
142.8
4/30/2009
20 (83%)
6.9
3.3
57.5
5/l/2009
18 (75%)
13.8
6.3
150.6
5/2/2009
22 (92%)
19.6
9.8
209.5
- 5/3/2009
23 (96%)
16.1
9.8
203.9
5/4/2009
19 (79%)
19.6
11.3
200
5/5/2009
20 (83%)
9.2
4.8
109
5/6/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
8.3
182.9
5/7/2009
24 (100%)
16.1
9.7
207.1
5/8/2009
17 (71 %)
12.7
6.6
180
5/9/2009
16 (67%)
19.6
11.3
229.4
5/10/2009
17 (71 %)
10.4
3.5
152.9
5/11/2009
18 (75%)
12.7.
5.1
41.1
5/12/2009
19 (79%)
8.1
4.5
146.3
5/13/2009
19 (79%)
12.7
6
80
_ 5/14/2009
21 (88%)
13.8
7.1
111
5/15/2009
23 (96%)
12.7
6.5
104.3
5/16/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
4.4
149
5/17/2009
20 (83%)
15
9.1
217
5/18/2009
19 (79%)
19.6
10.8
27.4

5/19/2009
21 (88%)
16.1
8.9
81
87.7
5/20/2009
22 (92%)
12.7
8.5
48.9
5/21/2009
18 (75%)
12.7
3.8
93.8
5/22/2009
21 (88%)
11.5
4.5
87
5/23/2009
23 (96%)
10.4
3.7
107.1
5/24/2009
21 (88%)
9.2
3.8
4.1
98.2
5/25/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
69
5/26/2009
21 (88%)
11.5
4.5
69
5/27/2009
20 (83%)
9.2
4
5.1
167.6
5/28/2009
21 (88%)
10.4
7.2
187.7
5/29/2009
22 (92%)
15
3
157.6
5/30/2009
21 (88%)
6.9
5.2
159.5
5/31/2009
19 (79%)
12.7
6.8
96.1
6/1/2009
18 (75%)
11.5
6.3
182.2
_ 6/2/2009
23 (96%)
11.5
7.7
203.2
6/3/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
6.9
178.3
6/4/2009
23 (96%)
10.4
187
6/5/2009
23 (96%)
16.1
8.8
6/6/2009
20 (83%)
6.9
2.6
25.5
6/7/2009
19 (79%)
6.9
2.9
59.5
6/8/2009
18 (75%)
8.1
3.1
110.6
6/9/2009
16 (67%)
10.4
3.6
83.1
6/10/2009
16 (67%)
5.8
3.5
108.8
6/11/2009
16 (67%)
10.4
5.4
148.8
6/12/2009
16 (67%)
10.4
6.1
178.1
6/13/2009
11 (46%)
8.1
2.4
70
6114/2009
21 (88%)
9.2
3.7
92.9
6/15/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
3.9
60.5
6/16/2009
22 (92%)
9.2
5.3
58.2
6/17/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
7.6
94.8
6/18/2009
20 (83%)
9.2
5.9
165
189.4
6/19/2009
17(71%)
9.2
5.2
183.5
6/20/2009
17 (71 %)
13.8
5.6
6/21/2009
18 (75%)
17.3
6.5
175.6
6/22/2009
16 (67%)
13.8
7.2
269.4
6/23/2009
15 (63%)
6.9
4
150
6/24/2009
13 (54%)
9.2
3.7
174.6
6/26/2009
12 (50%)
6.9
2.5
125.8
' 6/26/2009
13 (54%)
10.4
6.6
208.5
6/27/2009
12 (50%)
10.4
5.1
89•2
6/28/2009
11 (46%)
5.8
1.6
82.7
6/29/2009
15 (63%)
6.9
2.8
143.3
6/30/2009
15 (63%)
12.7
3.6
108.7
7/1/2009
19 (79%)
12.7
5.8
182.1
7/2/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
2.2
79.5
7/3/2009
16 (67%)
9.2
4.3
165.6
7/4/2009
13 (54%)
8.1
2.9
133.8
7/5/2009
15 (63%)
6.9
2.3
106.7
7/6/2009
20 (83%)
10.4
2.7
65.5
7/7/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
2.8
76.4
7/8/2009
14 (58%)
6.9
1.9
87.1
_
7/9/2009
15 (63%)
12.7
5.4
37.3

- 7/10/2009
20 (83%)
10.4
4.3
25
7/11/2009
19 (79%)
11.5
4.3
121.1
7/12/2009
18 (75%)
11.5
7.2
200
7/13/2009
18 (75%)
12.7
2.7
95
7/14/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
3.2
46.4
7/15/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
2.2
91.4
7/16/2009
13 (54%)
12.7
7.1
203.8
_
7/17/2009
17(71%)
11.5
4.5 '
117.1
7/18/2009
15 (63%)
5.8
1.7
84.7
7/19/2009
17 (71 %)
6.9
4
88.8
7/20/2009
16 (67%)
6.9
2.1
31.3
7/21/2009
19 (79%)
6.9
2
56.8
7/22/2009
18 (75%)
10.4
3.6
65.6
- 7/23/2009
20 (83%)
5.8
2.3
122
7/24/2009
16 (67%)
10.4
5
170
- 7/25/2009
18 (75%)
9.2
3.5
81.7
7/26/2009
23 (96%)
13.8
6.7
144.8
7/27/2009
22 (92%)
17.3
6.9
190.5
7/28/2009
18 (75%)
12.7
6.2
176.1
7/29/2009
16 (67%)
13.8
8.4
193.8
_
7/30/2009
16 (67%)
13.8
8.5
214.4
-. 7/31/2009
16 (67%)
16.1
9.3
196.9
8/l/2009
19 (79%)
6.9
4.3
203.2
8/2/2009
18 (75%)
10.4
5.3
172.8
8/3/2009
19 (79%)
9.2
2.7.
105.8
8/4/2009
16 (67%)
10.4
4.1
113.8
8/5/2009
18 (75%)
12.7
6.6
182.2
8/6/2009
21 (88%)
11.5
4.7
184.3
8/7/2009
19 (79%)
5.8
2.2
129.5
_ - 8/8/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
3.3
112.9
8/9/2009
16 (67%)
12.7
7.4
225.6
8/10/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
6.2
206.8
8/11/2009
18 (75%)
11.5
6
218.3
8/12/2009
19 (79%)
15
2.2
66.3
8/13/2009
14 (58%)
4.6
0.3
25
8/14/2009
23 (96%)
9.2
2.4
43
8/15/2009.
19 (79%)
6.9
3.3
179.5
8/16/2009
16 (67%)
4.6
1.6
82.5
8/17/2009
17 (71 %)
6.9
2
83.5
8/18/2009
15 (63%)
10.4
6.1
193.3
8/19/2009
20 (83%)
11.5
6.9
209.5
8/20/2009
20 (83%)
12.7
7.9
197
8/21/2009
15 (63%)
12.7
7.1
185.3
8/22/2009
19 (79%)
17.3
3.3
119.5
8/23/2009
20 (83%)
5.8
2.2
78.5
8/24/2009
24 (100%)
5.8
1.8
105.8
8/25/2009
19 (79%)
5.8
3.4
84.7
-, 8/26/2009
15 (63%)
5.8
2
108.7
8/27/2009
17 (71 %)
8.1
3.7
176.5
- 8/28/2009
22 (92%)
15
5
56.4
8/29/2009
21 (88%)
9.2
5.5
231.4
_
8/30/2009
17 (71 %)
6.9
3.7
158.2

8/31/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
4
25.8
9/l/2009
17(71%)
13.8
8.1
238.2
_
9/2/2009
24 (100%)
15
9
175.8
9/3/2009
17 (71 %)
16.1
8.9
275.9
9/4/2009
20 (83%)
8.1
2.5
151
9/5/2009
22 (92%)
8.1
2.1
32.3
9/6/2009
24 (100%)
13.8
6.5
42.5
9/7/2009
19 (79%)
10.4
6
45.3
9/8/2009
23 (96%)
16.1
9.3
290
9/9/2009
23 (96%)
11.5
5.5
174.3
9/10/2009
24 (100%)
15
8.9
275
9/11/2009
18 (75%)
6.9
3.3
188.3
9/12/2009
24 (100%)
6.9
2.8
145.8
9/13/2009
23 (96%)
9.2
3.7
168.3
9/14/2009
23 (96%)
10.4
2.6
113.9
9/15/2009
19 (79%)
6.9
2.4
94.7
9/16/2009
21 (88%)
10.4
2
50
9/17/2009
21 (88%)
6.9
4.5
152.4
9/18/2009
22 (92%)
4.6
1.3
27.3
9/19/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
5.3
33.3
9/20/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
4.7
39.5
9/21/2009
22 (92%)
9.2
4.7
59.1
9/22/2009
20 (83%)
9.2
4.9
57
9/23/2009
20 (83%)
9.2
1.8
60.5
9/24/2009
22 (92%)
6.9
2.6
123.2
_
9/25/2009
22 (92%)
17.3
6.2
107.7
- 9/26/2009
24 (100%)
10.4
7.1
68.8
9/27/2009
_
22 (92%)
10.4
4.7
168.6
9/28/2009
24 (100%)
15
6.1
138.8
9/29/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
4.2
158.6
9/30/2009
21 (88%)
8.1
1.9
104.3
10/l/2009
21 (88%)
6.9
0.5
26.7
10/2/2009
24 (100%)
8.1
2.1
58.3
10/3/2009
24 (100%)
9.2
2.7
101.3
10/4/2009
23 (96%)
9.2
2.9
162.2
10/5/2009
28 (117%)
9.2
0.9
38.9
10/6/2009
25 (104%)
8.1
2.7
48.8
10/7/2009
19 (79%)
15
7.9
207.9
_
10/8/2009
22 (92%)
10.4
2.6
57.3
10/9/2009
17(71%)
15
7.4
152.4
10/10/2009
23 (96%)
15
6.7
155.2
10/11/2009
24 (100%)
10.4
4.1
82.5
10/12/2009
21 (88%)
16.1
4.3
164.8
10/13/2009
19 (79%)
9.2
3.9
223.2
10/14/2009
23 (96%)
8.1
5.7
41.7
10/15/2009
25 (104%)
10.4
5.8
305.6
10/16/2009
22 (92%)
11.5
6.4
291.8
10/17/2009
23 (96%)
11.5
8.2
308.7
10/18/2009
23 (96%)
15
8.6
328.7
10/19/2009
23 (96%)
12.7
5.4
233
10/20/2009
23 (96%)
5.8
1.6
79.6
10/21/2009
22 (92%)
5.8
1.7
67.7

10/22/2009
22 (92%)
9.2
2.7
104.1
10/23/2009
20 (83%)
15
4.8
99.5
10/24/2009
24 (100%)
16.1
8
180.4
10/25/2009
20 (83%)
11.5
6.9
126.5
10/26/2009
17 (71%)
12.7
8.6
27.1
10/27/2009
23 (96%)
6.9
2.8
140.9
10/28/2009
20 (83%)
16.1
6.3
150.5
10/29/2009
24 (100%)
10.4
4.8
69.6
10/30/2009
22 (92%)
6.9
3.2
78.2
10/31/2009
21 (88%)
12.7
5.6
140.7

View of connection to Taylor Creek in SW corner of pond/basin.
Upper end of existing ditch to be filled to enhance water quality.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK
LOG AND EXISTING DITCH
PROJECT: ew wam ono mm" sir
APPLICANT: wa WAIM vmuvm
1/2010 Report to DWQ
Supplemental to CAMA Major

jLcC
Existing earthen berm with dirt road at western edge of pond/basin.
Could be removed to enhance connection to Taylor Creek.
View of earthern berm with dirt road on western side of basin.
At pond/basin, looking west.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING BERM BETWEEN TAYLDR CREEK
AND BAY LAKES POND/BASIN
PROJECT: My LWES, CNOCdMNNY eAY
APPLICANT: m wMNEN wNICWxo
/2010 Report to DWO
Supplemental to CAMA Major

Existing surface water connection to Chocowinity Bay, wind tide flooded
area (area of proposed navigation channel).
On property, facing Chocowinity Bay.
Epp
M1 t
Existing surface water connection to Chocowinity Bay, wind tide flooded
area (area of proposed navigation channel).
On property, facing Chocowinity Bay.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT: ekr was, c"ocomrmr sia
APPUCANT: WL wARF04 WOMM
EXISTING SURFACE WATER EXCHANGE 2 2010 Report to DWO
p WITH CHOCOWINITY BAY
Supplemental to CAMA Major application

Existing connection to Taylor Creek, view from the Bay Lakes
pond/basin.
Water exchange between Taylor Creek and Bay Lakes
pond/basin at existing connection to Taylor Creek.
PROJECT: ear was, cxOMN" ear
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS I APPLICANT: „p WAM04 W„a„M
EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK I. ,
Supplemental to CAMA Major

View of existing connection to Taylor Creek, facing N to NW.
Taylor Creek to left of rip rap, Bay Lakes pond/basin to the right.
View of existing connection to Taylor Creek, rip rap per DCM
requirements, two submerged culverts under rip rap.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING CONNECTION TO TAYLOR CREEK
PROJECT: air Lws. cnocan ear
APPLICANT: wlt w� w Oww
/2010 Report to DWO
Supplemental to CAMA Major

i
ff
or
On -site Tide Gauge, Chocowinity Bay
(located at dock in existing open water canal)
On -site Tide Gauge, Bay Lakes (placed at dock in background
on the eastern side of the existing pond/basin area)
PROJECT: BAY was, aHOCOMWTY SAY
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPLICANT: uR waneH wHc
ON —SITE TIDE GAUGES 2 2010 Report to DWQ
L G Supplemental to CAMA Major applicatio

Water flowing in to lake from Taylor
Creek at very high tide over lake
culvert and rip -rap fill into lake
' South/West
t
a
y �• i
E,y(. • i _ ♦ i�iw, try. ,It. ,
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING CONNECTION TO RODMAN CREEK
PROJECT: air was, ammm ea
APPUCANT: MFL MAMM wPCKW
to LAMA Major

F
Ditch view culvert from canal system
under Whichard's Beach Rd.
Ditch view culvert from canal system
and culvert under Whichard's Beach Rd.
North/Fast
g ♦F� .
!k 1
F
C
•«w— SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT: eA.LAw.owo"e,.
EXISTING CONNECTION TO RODMAN CREEK APPLICANT: M WNREN wwauw
CULVERT WHICHARDS BEACH ROAD 2 2010 Report to ON
II Supplemental to CAMA Major application

Longnose Gar found on bank 9/2009 (Lepisosteus osseus)
y
-OIL ...
Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)
�-�- SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
FISH POPULATION STUDY
LOG 10/30/2009
PROJECT: w wm mocomm ein
APPLICANT: W wAFhVN wH
/2010 Report to DW0
ipplemental to CAMA Major application

10/30/2009