121-96 Harkers Point

Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
and
tal Resources Commission
T'rMtt
X
Major Devel e inap� o� Environmental Concern
pursuant to N 11 j
X Excavation and/or fikLnYodf uan<tq (2PS 113-229
Issued to
authorizing development in Carteret County
Permit Number
121-96
SR 1335 , as requested in the permiuee's application dated2/12/96 including attached workplan
drawings 7 dated 2/20/96.
This permit, issued on <-� — Sr -skV-' , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
011
1) Title to the one acre public beach access area, as identified on workplan drawing sheet 6 of 7, shall
be transferred to Carteret County on or before December 31, 1996.
2) The placement of fences or similar structures which would prohibit lateral access to other portions
of the beach outside of the boundaries of the public beach access area is not authorized.
3) The design of all piers in and adjacent to the Straits shall be constructed in such a manner as to
allow for the reasonable movement of the public along the beachfront area. Examples of
acceptable pier designs include, but are not limited to, elevating the piers to allow for pedestrian
passage underneath the structure, or terminating the pier near the waters edge to allow for
pedestrian passage around the pier.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31.1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DE�INR'and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
AGE': ,
IV
Division of
This permit and its conditions are hereby
C�-j .r
P Signature of Permittee

Harkers Point S/D
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit#121-96
Page 2 of 4
4) The location, length and design pier on lot No. 3 shall be as shown on sheet 6 of 7,
dated 2120/96.
5) As indicated by the permittee, e efi, r t No. 4 shall include a statement acknowledging
the waiving of the 15 foot riparian c i r se /ack lative to Lot 3.
6)
7)
Prior to the initiation of any construction activit
boat basin, all live oysters within the boat basin
shoreline areas.
dated with the filling of the existing
shall be relocated to adjacent intertidal
The bulkhead alignment will approximate the mean high water level at the time of
construction, except where it crosses the entrance channel to the basin.
8) The alignment of the proposed bulkhead must be staked by a representative of the Division of
Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of construction. Failure
to initiate construction within 30 days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse weather
conditions, will require the alignment to be restaked by DCM within a maximum of 30 days
prior to the new expected start of construction.
9) The bulkhead must be constructed prior to any backfilling activities.
10) The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through
the structure.
11) The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal sheet piles
or other suitable materials approved by department personnel. No excavation is permitted
except for that which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap,
deadmen cables, etc. This permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the
approved alignment.
12) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
13) All back fill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined the permitted
bulkhead.

Barkers Point S/D
14) The construction of piers in Brooks
navigation into the Harbor'of ReN
further waterward than the existing
Permit #121-96
Page 3 of 4
shall be designed so as not to impact existing
constrtletgd on lots 27 and 28 shall not extend any
and adjacent to these lots.
Wastewater Trea e t an
� C
NOTE: The proposed wastewater treatment plant has receiv ization from the Division
of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Secti Approval letter dated
5/13/96) and Carteret County Health Department, Environmental Health Division
(Improvement Permit dated 6/27/96). A design flow of 13,440 gallons per day is
currently authorized. Any proposal to increase treatment plant design flow capacity
will require a modification of this CAMA permit.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that modeling performed by the Division of Water Quality,
Groundwater Section, indicates that additional expansion of facilities or sewage service
or the use of drain fields 1 or 2 will likely require the addition of pretreatment
processes to ensure compliance with State groundwater standards.
Water Quality Protection
15) The Division of Water Quality approved this project under stormwater management rules of
the Environmental Management Commission on 4/10/96 (Permit No. SW8 960310). Any
violation of or deviation from the plan approved by the D.W.Q. will be considered a violation
of this CAMA permit.
16) The activity will be conducted in such a way that prevents a significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the
turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant.
17) The disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within 30 working days of project completion.
NOTE: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required for this project. This plan
must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any land disturbing
activity. Submit this plan to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC
28405.

11
Harkers Point S/D Permit#121-96
Page 4 of 4
NOTE: The Division of Water Quality authorized the proposed development under General Water
Quality Certification No. 3025 (DWQ Project No. 960226) which was issued on 7/24/96.
18) Prior to any ground disturbint4ctiv
recovery plan shall be implemented Vk
lots. This plan shall be coordinate
Resources prior to its implementation.
8 or 9, an archaeological testing and data
ound within the boundaries of these four
eddy the N.C. Department of Cultural
19) Public access to the cemetery shall not be
General
20) The temporary placement or double handling of fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands
is not authorized.
21) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all
navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must not
interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property, with the exception of individual home
construction, may require a modification of this permit. The construction of individual
homes may qualify for authorization under a Minor Development Permit. Contact a
representative of the Division at [phone] or the Carteret County Local Permit
Officer at [phone] prior to the commencement of any such activity for this
determination.
NOTE: It is recommended that the permittee schedule a pre -construction meeting with the N.C.
Department of Environmental Health to discuss disease vector control measures.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action ID No.
199501535.

Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH- CAROLINA
Department of Envirommiit, Health & Natural Resources
6a'stal:Resources Commission
%
_ Major Developmentin�an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118,.
% Excavation and/or fillingpursnant to NCGS 113-229
Permit Number
121-96
authorizing development in
Carteret County at Brooks Creek and the Straits. Harkers
Island,
adj.
SR 1335,
as requested in the permittee's application dated2/12/96 including
attached work -plan
drawings 7 dated 2/20/96
This permit, issued on <-� — n�r gl_. , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Public Beach Access Area
1) Title to the one acre public beach access area, as identified on workplan drawing sheet 6 of 7, shall
be transferred to Carteret County on or before December 31, 1996.
2) The placement of fences or similar structures which would prohibit lateral access to other portions
of the beach outside of the boundaries of the public beach access area is not authorized.
3) The design of all piers in and adjacent to the Straits shall be constructed in such a manner as to
allow for the reasonable movement of the public along the beachfront area. Examples of
acceptable pier designs include, but are not limited to, elevating the piers to allow for pedestrian
passage underneath the structure, or terminating the pier near the waters edge to allow for
pedestrian passage around the pier.
attached sheets for Additional
This permit_action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31,1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
oger N. 8ch4ct6r, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Harkers Point S/D
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS -
Permit#121-96
Page 2 of 4
4) The location, length and design of the pier on lot No. 3 shall be as shown on sheet 6 of 7,
dated 2/20/96.
5) As indicated by the permittee, the deed for lot No. 4 shall include a statement acknowledging
the waiving of the 15 foot riparian corridor setback relative to Lot 3.
Boat Basin Filling
6) Prior to the initiation of any construction activities associated with the filling of the existing
boat basin, all live oysters within the boat basin area shall be relocated to adjacent intertidal
shoreline areas.
7) The bulkhead alignment will approximate the mean high water level at the time of
construction, except where it crosses the entrance channel to the basin.
8) The alignment of the proposed bulkhead must be staked by a representative of the Division of
Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of construction. Failure
to initiate construction within 30 days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse weather
conditions, will require the alignment to be restaked by DCM within a maximum of 30 days
prior to the new expected start of construction.
9) The bulkhead must be constructed prior to any backfilling activities.
10) The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through
the structure.
11) The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal sheet piles
or other suitable materials approved by department personnel. No excavation is permitted
except for that which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap,
deadmen cables, etc. This permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the
approved alignment.
12) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
13) All back fill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined the permitted
bulkhead.

Harkers Point S/D
Pier Construction
Permit #121-96
Page 3 of 4
14) The construction of piers in Brooks Channel shall be designed so as not to impact existing
navigation into the Harbor of Refuge. Piers constructed on lots 27 and 28 shall not extend any
further waterward than the existing pier structures located on and adjacent to these lots.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
NOTE: The proposed wastewater treatment plant has received authorization from the Division
of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section (Site Approval letter dated
5/13/96) and Carteret County Health Department, Environmental Health Division
(Improvement Permit dated 6/27/96). A design flow of 13,440 gallons per day is
currently authorized. Any proposal to increase treatment plant design flow capacity
will require a modification of this CAMA permit.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that modeling performed by the Division of Water Quality,
Groundwater Section, indicates that additional expansion of facilities or sewage service
or the use of drain fields 1 or 2 will likely require the addition of pretreatment
processes to ensure compliance with State groundwater standards.
Water Quality Protection
15) The Division of Water Quality approved this project under stormwater management rules of
the Environmental Management Commission on 4/10/96 (Permit No. SW8 960310). Any
violation of or deviation from the plan approved by the D.W.Q. will be considered a violation
of this CAMA permit.
16) The activity will be conducted in such a way that prevents a significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the
turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant.
17) The disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within,30 working days of project completion.
NOTE: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required for this project. This plan
must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any land disturbing
activity. Submit this plan to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC
28405.

Harkers Point S/D Permit4121-96
Page 4 of 4
NOTE: The Division of Water Quality authorized the proposed development under General Water
Quality Certification No. 3025 (DWQ Project No. 960226) which was issued on 7/24/96.
Cultural Resources
18) Prior to any ground disturbing activities on lots 6, 7, 8 or 9, an archaeological testing and data
recovery plan shall be implemented for the historic site found within the boundaries of these four
lots. This plan shall be coordinated with and approved by the N.C. Department of Cultural
Resources prior to its implementation.
19) Public access to the cemetery shall not be restricted or impeded.
General
20) The temporary placement or double handling of fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands
is not authorized.
21) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all
navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must not
interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property, with the exception of individual home
construction, may require a modification of this permit. The construction of individual
homes may qualify for authorization under a Minor Development Permit. Contact a
representative of the Division at [phone] or the Carteret County Local Permit
Officer at [phone] prior to the commencement of any such activity for this
determination.
NOTE: It is recommended that the permittee schedule a pre -construction meeting with the N.C.
Department of Environmental Health to discuss disease vector control measures.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action ID No.
199501535.

r-'
Permit Class
Permit Number
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Enviroruneht,_Health & Natural Resources
and `
Coa`stal'Resources Commission
y ' t
r
y ern "
or A
X f
_ Major DevelopmenCin an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A=118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
121-96
Issued to Harkers Point SID. c/o R.L. Moore, 2105 W. Nash Street, Wilson, NC 27858
authorizing development in Carteret County at Brooks Creek and the Straits. Harkers Island, adj.
SR 1335 , as requested in the permittee's application dated2/12/96 including attachedworkplan
drawings, 7, dated 2/20/96.
This permit, issued on <� — —(�k I-, , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Public Beach Access Area
1) Title to the one acre public beach access area, as identified on workplan drawing sheet 6 of 7, shall
be transferred to Carteret County on or before December 31, 1996.
2) The placement of fences or similar structures which would prohibit lateral access to other portions
of the beach outside of the boundaries of the public beach access area is not authorized.
3) The design of all piers in and adjacent to the Straits shall be constructed in such a manner as to
allow for the reasonable movement of the public along the beachfront area. Examples of
acceptable pier designs include, but are not limited to, elevating the piers to allow for pedestrian
passage underneath the structure, or terminating the pier near the waters edge to allow for
pedestrian passage around the pier.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permitLaction may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31.1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
oger N. ch cter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

r.
Harkers Point S/D Permit#121-96
Page 2 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4) The location, length and design of the pier on lot No. 3 shall be as shown on sheet 6 of 7,
dated 2/20/96.
5) As indicated by the permittee, the deed for lot No. 4 shall include a statement acknowledging
the waiving of the 15 foot riparian corridor setback relative to Lot 3.
Boat Basin Filling
6) Prior to the initiation of any construction activities associated with the filling of the existing
boat basin, all live oysters within the boat basin area shall be relocated to adjacent intertidal
shoreline areas.
7) The bulkhead alignment will approximate the mean high water level at the time of
construction, except where it crosses the entrance channel to the basin.
8) The alignment of the proposed bulkhead must be staked by a representative of the Division of
Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of construction. Failure
to initiate construction within 30 days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse weather
conditions, will require the alignment to be restaked by DCM within a maximum of 30 days
prior to the new expected start of construction.
9) The bulkhead must be constructed prior to any backfilling activities.
10) The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through
the structure.
11) The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal sheet piles
or other suitable materials approved by department personnel. No excavation is permitted
except for that which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap,
deadmen cables, etc. This permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the
approved alignment.
12) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
13) All back fill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined the permitted
bulkhead.

r
Harkers Point S/D
Pier Construction
Permit #121-96
Page 3 of 4
14) The construction of piers in Brooks Channel shall be designed so as not to impact existing
navigation into the Harbor'of Refuge. Piers constructed on lots 27 and 28 shall not extend any
further waterward than the existing pier structures located on and adjacent to these lots.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
NOTE: The proposed wastewater treatment plant has received authorization from the Division
of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section (Site Approval letter dated
5/13/96) and Carteret County Health Department, Environmental Health Division
(Improvement Permit dated 6/27/96). A design flow of 13,440 gallons per day is
currently authorized. Any proposal to increase treatment plant design flow capacity
will require a modification of this CAMA permit.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that modeling performed by the Division of Water Quality,
Groundwater Section, indicates that additional expansion of facilities or sewage service
or the use of drain fields 1 or 2 will likely require the addition of pretreatment
processes to ensure compliance with State groundwater standards.
Water Quality Protection
15) The Division of Water Quality approved this project under stormwater management rules of
the Environmental Management Commission on 4/10/96 (Permit No. SW8 960310). Any
violation of or deviation from the plan approved by the D.W.Q. will be considered a violation
of this CAMA permit.
16) The activity will be conducted in such a way that prevents a significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the
turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant.
17) The disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within 30 working days of project completion.
NOTE: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required for this project. This plan
must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any land disturbing
activity. Submit this plan to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC
28405.

Harkers Point S/D Permit#121-96
Page 4 of 4
NOTE: The Division of Water Quality authorized the proposed development under General Water
Quality Certification No. 3025 (DWQ Project No. 960226) which was issued on 7/24/96.
Cultural Resources
18) Prior to any ground disturbing activities on lots 6, 7, 8 or 9, an archaeological testing and data
recovery plan shall be implemented for the historic site found within the boundaries of these four
lots. This plan shall be coordinated with and approved by the N.C. Department of Cultural
Resources prior to its implementation.
19) Public access to the cemetery shall not be restricted or impeded.
General
20) The temporary placement or double handling of fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands
is not authorized.
21) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all
navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must not
interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property, with the exception of individual home
construction, may require a modification of this permit. The construction of individual
homes may qualify for authorization under a Minor Development Permit. Contact a
representative of the Division at [phone] or the Carteret County Local Permit
Officer at [phone] prior to the commencement of any such activity for this
determination.
NOTE: It is recommended that the permittee schedule a pre -construction meeting with the N.C.
Department of Environmental Health to discuss disease vector control measures.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action ID No.
199501535.

fl�
Permit Class
Permit Number
NEW
STATE O&NORTH-CAROLINA
Department of Envimnmec t, Health & Natural Resources
X Major Dev,,� 5 `• for r^ "`�,s ;'
elopmentin an Area.of Envimiimental Concern
pursuant toNCGS113A=1'1 8_ '"..>...
.e t-U,41tVt.,�• J ..
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
121-96
Issued to Harkerc Point S/D, c/o R.L. Moore, 2105 W. Nash Street, Wilson, NC 27858
authorizing development in Carteret County at Brooks Creek and the Straits- Harkers Island. adj.
SR 1335 as requested in the permittee's application dated2/12/96 including attached workplan
drawings. 7. dated 2/20/96.
This permit, issued on <� —g4. , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Public Beach Access Area
1) Title to the one acre public beach access area, as identified on workplan drawing sheet 6 of 7, shall
be transferred to Carteret County on or before December 31, 1996.
2) The placement of fences or similar structures which would prohibit lateral access to other portions
of the beach outside of the boundaries of the public beach access area is not authorized.
3) The design of all piers in and adjacent to the Straits shall be constructed in such a manner as to
allow for the reasonable movement of the public along the beachfront area. Examples of
acceptable pier designs include, but are not limited to, elevating the piers to allow for pedestrian
passage underneath the structure, or terminating the pier near the waters edge to allow for
pedestrian passage around the pier.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit_action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31,1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
oger N. ch cter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Harkers Point S/D
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit#121-96
Page 2 of 4
4) The location, length and design of the pier on lot No. 3 shall be as shown on sheet 6 of 7,
dated 2/20/96.
5) As indicated by the permittee, the deed for lot No. 4 shall include a statement acknowledging
the waiving of the 15 foot riparian corridor setback relative to Lot 3.
Boat Basin Filling
6) Prior to the initiation of any construction activities associated with the filling of the existing
boat basin, all live oysters within the boat basin area shall be relocated to adjacent intertidal
shoreline areas.
7) The bulkhead alignment will approximate the mean high water level at the time of
construction, except where it crosses the entrance channel to the basin.
8) The alignment of the proposed bulkhead must be staked by a representative of the Division of
Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of construction. Failure
to initiate construction within 30 days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse weather
conditions, will require the alignment to be restaked by DCM within a maximum of 30 days
prior to the new expected start of construction.
9) The bulkhead must be constructed prior to any backfilling activities.
10) The bulkhead must be structurally tight so as to prevent seepage of backfill materials through
the structure.
11) The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal sheet piles
or other suitable materials approved by department personnel. No excavation is permitted
except for that which may be required for the construction of the bulkhead wall, riprap,
deadmen cables, etc. This permit does not authorize any excavation waterward of the
approved alignment.
12) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
13) All back fill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined the permitted
bulkhead.

Harkers Point S/D
Pier Construction
Permit #121-96
Page 3 of 4
14) The construction of piers in Brooks Channel shall be designed so as not to impact existing
navigation into the Harbor of Refuge. Piers constructed on lots 27 and 28.shall not extend any
further waterward than the existing pier structures located on and adjacent to these lots.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
NOTE: The proposed wastewater treatment plant has received authorization from the Division
of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section (Site Approval letter dated
5/13/96) and Carteret County Health Department, Environmental Health Division
(Improvement Permit dated 6/27/96). A design flow of 13,440 gallons per day is
currently authorized. Any proposal to increase treatment plant design flow capacity
will require a modification of this CAMA permit.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that modeling performed by the Division of Water Quality,
Groundwater Section, indicates that additional expansion of facilities or sewage service
or the use of drain fields 1 or 2 will likely require the addition of pretreatment
processes to ensure compliance with State groundwater standards.
Water Quality Protection
15) The Division of Water Quality approved this project under stormwater management rules of
the Environmental Management Commission on 4/10/96 (Permit No. SW8 960310). Any
violation of or deviation from the plan approved by the D.W.Q. will be considered a violation
of this CAMA permit.
16) The activity will be conducted in such a way that prevents a significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the
turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant.
17) The disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within 30 working days of project completion.
NOTE: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required for this project. This plan
must be filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any land disturbing
activity. Submit this plan to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC
28405.

Harkers Point S/D Permit#121-96
Page 4 of 4
NOTE: The Division of Water Quality authorized the proposed development under General Water
Quality Certification No. 3025 (DWQ Project No. 960226) which was issued on 7/24/96.
Cultural Resources
18) Prior to any ground disturbing activities on lots 6, 7, 8 or 9, an archaeological testing and data
recovery plan shall be implemented for the historic site found within the boundaries of these four
lots. This plan shall be coordinated with and approved by the N.C. Department of Cultural
Resources prior to its implementation.
19) Public access to the cemetery shall not be restricted or impeded.
General
20) The temporary placement or double handling of fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands
is not authorized.
21) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all
navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work. Use of the permitted activity must not
interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property, with the exception of individual home
construction, may require a modification of this permit. The construction of individual
homes may qualify for authorization under a Minor Development Permit. Contact a
representative of the Division at [phone] or the Carteret County Local Permit
Officer at [phone] prior to the commencement of any such activity for this
determination.
NOTE: It is recommended that the permittee schedule a pre -construction meeting with the N.C.
Department of Environmental Health to discuss disease vector control measures.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action.lD No.
199501535.

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATIO ' ,0 `1...,..�J
FEB 2 0 1995 CTo be completed by all applicants) LO.
QW--lu ,—"a urtakw
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Harkers Island
a. Landowner:
Name R.L. Moore
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City
Wilson
State N.C.
Zip 27858 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name HTB Associates, L.L.C.
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City Wilson State N.C.
Zip 27858 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Harkers Point
N07E: Permit will be issued in name of lmdowner(j), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT.
a. County Carteret
c. Street address or secondary road number
NCSR 1335
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? ' x Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Straits '
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
28 lot subdivision (single family
Fill old marina.
Construct bulkhead.
Sewer force main installation.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private use.
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. To construct 28 lot single
family subdivision. Equipment will
include conventional earth moving
equipment, bulldozer, backhoe dump
trucks, etc.
Revised 03/95

Form-DCM-MP-1 •.: o
4..._LAND AND -WATER
'.CHARACTERISTICS
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Offsite sewage disposal system presently
being reviewed by On —Site Sewage Branch.
a.
Size of entire tract 27.96 acres
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. '(For example, surface runoff, sanitary
b.
Size of individual lot(s) 20, 000 sf and larger.
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, '"wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
c.
Approximate elevation Of tract above MHW or
through swales in a low —density 'develop—
NWL' 5 MHW
ment.
d.
Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Sandy,
Individual wells proposed. No community
source available.
e.
Vegetation on tract Wooded/oak and pine
are uredomindte species.
f.
-Man-made features now on tract Old marina.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g.
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
'form,
classification of the site? (Cansutt the local land use plan.)
In addition to the completed application the
following items must be submitted:
N_ Conservation X Um Transitional i ep)
Developed .Community Y.
• A copy of the deed (with state application, only) or
Rural Other
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
h.
How is the tract zoned by local government?
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
Unzoned.
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
i.
Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
from the owner to carry out the project.
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning convUance certificate,ifapplicabk) :
• An accurate, _dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
done for the tract? X Yes No
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
If yes, by whom? Archaeological Resea`rch
detailed description.)
Consultants,:Inc.;(Thomas Hargrove)
'k.
Is the project located in a National Registered
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
Historic District or does it involve a National
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
Register listed or eligible property?
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
Yes X No
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
1.
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
Coastal (marsh) X Other _ (
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes.
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
(ABach documentation, if available)
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
- Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name
Carteret County
Address
Courthouse Sq., Beaufort NC 285
Phone
[phone]
Name
J. L. Maxwell, Jr.
Address
711 Lakeshore Dr., Goldsboro NC
Phone
[phone]
Name
Holly Hamilton Briggs
Address
909 Evans St., Morehead Citv NC
Phone
[phone]
SEE ATTigc4,)
1t: T( Fog. NCp07-
• A list of
previous state or federal permits issued for
work on
the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
None.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained iR the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
16 grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
27534project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
28557application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 12th day of Feb. 1996
Print Name /-ClHarri
Signature
Landowner or, d rized Ageni
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
X DCM MP-3 Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4 Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM W-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
I5VIIul rl R 1 q t I
FEB 2 0 19% h
Revised 031"

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Esdcting Project
Length Width Depth Depth
+Mt',l
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? —Yes _ No
If yes, where?
FEB 2 0 1996
Revised 03/95 r�a�Nr.r. aaMNMliI'.

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
_ Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
X Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
�T
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
4'
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Unknown.
(Source of infor=tion)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
Wooden bulkhead.
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material Sand.
i. Source of fill material Unknown, to be
purchased from properly licensed
borrow pit.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water 150 x 150 x 6' AVG = 5,000 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 150
(3) Purpose of fill Fill old upland marina
basin.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 5 (along
south side of basin).
(2) Purpose of fill Reclaim old inland
marina.
5. GENERAL.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Property constructed
bulkhead and seeding.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe, trackhoe, dozer, dump trucks.
c. Will wetlands be cr,ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 28 single family lots.
b. Number of lots or parcels 28
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) 28 units— [1 unit/acre.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. 5 acre maximum.
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? X Yes No
If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
Marl and asphalt.
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. 30i MRX1ftUrr1
Fog. ZN 1U(ptrA- L6-r' p7e or d)6v0-Lcrt,ts
W i r it-t N -75, A ECG
Revised 0319E
FEB 2019%
rafit.r......•.....«rw.Mp►
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also, require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
X Yes No
If yes, date submitted _Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Offsite wastewater treatment plant.
Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? In review by
(Aaach appropriate documentation)On—Site Sewage Branch
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Surface runoff.
Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Individual wells.
m. Will water be impounded? _ Yes X No
If yes, how many acies?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
Clyde Harris
Appli nt Projgct Niel
Signature QIJY�lJ
121ZolSCD
Date

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
Hestron Plaza One
Suite 102
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
[phone]
A)
SHEET NO.
OF_
CALCULATED BV
DATE
CHECKED BY
DATE_
Name - N.C, . Dt;PT, or- TeANsPoR�A�(o�
t�jl 1cj EN6��rr�C.s CFf c-e-
(p(b I GlvA1Zcrnje- M ,
N eU) P .r, N c. z356 v
'A llo. A A2A,U Gocnc��
R CT Ala 1$gkS )M 1(P )J ®.1. G.m 01471 bp,n !EI M11UPP36ll0

HARKERS ISLAND ROAD
ROAD SECTION
SCALE: 1"=10'
2x10 TREATED FILTER
CAP CLOTH 5's� 0 GALVANIZED
WITH THREADED ENDS.
r-WASHER AND NUTS
a
ro
14x6 WALER
I— DEADMAN
6x6 @ 8' O.C. 2x10 T&G WITH @ 8' O.C.
W/8' EMBEDMENT 4' EMBEDMENT
BULKHEAD DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=30'
---------------------
GpR...Uk9
'_ :a s Q•
90 • .FNQ1N.• �:
PROJECT •:PM707
SHEET • 7 OF 7
DETAIL SHEET
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
MARKERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
PHONE: ( 919 ) 237-6701 DJV
APPROVED:
A STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. I RDC
I HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
M9__FREAD CITY, N.C. 285, 2/20/96
AS SHOWN

I

PROPOSED DEDICATION OF 1.00 AC °-3.38
OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY.
LOTS I& 2 RESERVES THE RIGHT
TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK- `-3'3'
WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO
THE BEACH AREA /N ACCORDANCE °-3.22
WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WANE THE 15'
SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION •-2'54
OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN.
APPROX. AREA •1.00 ACRES k • Io
APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER
PIER
UNE
-345
� aS-J728. O.OB
0GUZN-JPNp
024
m
43M
°-z.72
.-1.74
-1.39
ISLAND
W QM WF,CUNLIS •�.7
30,67
COMMON
_ a
--
AV
.� SAWp' X >a LVy+�7p
fim
LAME I
Wfi,
LF -IS RCP
nn 100' 50' O 100, 200'
w ti
FEB 2 0 1996 i
SCALE 1" - 100'
PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA
•-- •••••CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HAtRK ERS POINT
PROJECT 0:PM707
(SHEET • 6 OF 7
a`'•jVkCAq 11'��.
SEAL
13343
0
;'Y•9 -" -G►Nd
D. CUB
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
PHONE: [phone] DJV
HESTRON
ONE SUITE 102
NC. 28557 , -
.tPPROVED:
ROC
DATE:
2/20/96
SCALE:
1

A•�l, a
•t rpm.
•
°
LNRT ROAD WTH
4Y EASEMENT
41
I$Rooks CREEk
R
F
. 11M-01•M
61 LF -I9RCP
CONSTRICTOV
ENTRANCE
rINTERSEGTION
FAWERS ISLAND ROAD &
BARKERS PUNT ROAD
L ,VY
s• em•-a•
a•K TaSIGHT
TRIANGLE
R +�y�+
* •
R
Q`o a
• WQ. 2t J2
•
+ R
c,�
• •Y.
r•• �ti
s
�••
t � g
EXISTING PRECAST BULKHEAD
• R +X
• •
;
8
+e
TBN IN LIGHT POLE
R+
ELEV•- 5.43 MSL
N ,
SEE ROAD SECTION
DETAILS SHEET 6 OF 6
FEB 2 0 19% 11
I
I
FORCE
................. ........
�.� 1
L
L
HARK ERS POINT
�.•`��NOARoll"of HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNEI
p .. ES,.••••'••••.SIp '•..9
2 t O� N9 ' ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET
100' 50' 0 100, 200'
SCALE 1" - 100'
MAIN PLAN
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
to S -
WILSON. N.C. 27858
DRAWN:
133a� 1 2 2
I"
PHONE: [phone]
DJV
•'s,90 '�
APPROVED:
' :FN(ph
g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
DATE:
EHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557
2/20/96
PROJECT •: PM707
SHEET •
/(93P)97=7 9
-1 L� LPL 2.d�
SCALE:
5 OF 7
RONALD D. CULL HER, P.E.
1 = 100

0 -3.15 438 LF NEW WOODED BULKHEAD -3.00
FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED -
BY CAMA OFFICALS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.SEE SHEET 6 OF 6
G 8.64 FOR DETAIL SECTION. ................
2.59 MLW------------- ----�.__,.-.9•:: •: -- •=o-m:,6.... paca
MHW 11 �_ -• - ...... --
�9-yam._
TIMBER :•WINGWAAa
tOff OF B K
m (J1 >
p � a
0
N/F
MAXWELL
...--- -------------•--
bz•err=a
V49'W = L•91=1 0. 86=1, 50.0L
1'Z 860 94•bV .4.64.E .LB
PROJECT •;PM707
SHEET • 4 OF 7
O
O -3.08
O -2.73
-2.92
-2.39
EXISTING BULKHEAD
0.93 TO BE REMOVED
.71
0-6.58
O
2.05
•'•• N
I
0-1.59
O
0 0.6
b:•j a EXTENSX)N OF
6.96 I
o
-a.9e
�! PAOPER7Y LINE-�
,
-0.47
N
' ONCE FILLED
I
a
••' m05.71
0.9
0-9.27
ld,•
o I
-5.90
O
.01
I
-7-89 C
••" -0.61
e:pa
I
A
0 -7.24
-8.37
O I
01
0 -8.21 1
0.96 -O -8.88 I
-0.56-
0 o_1.08
WETLA
'-TO BE I
A .
r-
3.36
0
-2.96
404 WETLANDS LINE-------------�
8:78...................... v-o.em------------- - o
TOTAU 82.33•54'E �-3e MLW
33.6 2.48
TOP OF,,,g
)L •eye=a �9
=7.
-'•£b'bi �
S87•35' 13 E
Al
BOAT RAMP
BE FILLED
TIMBER WINGWALL
30, O
SCALE I'
MARINA FILL PLAN
0L%0
60' 12
gio..I'q
p tiq
S4Q SEAL
zz
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HA1IRK EIERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: HTB ASSOCIATES .L.L.C. DESIGNED:
` C/O CLYDE HARRIS & ASSOCIATES RDC
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJ V
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
g 3TROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
1[OREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96
47-7479
- D,.O -& 1.-PP f > /", SCALE:
p�

4
Ala .
y�
�i
a - '. � 1 ' �
is
' �.. ''..., t.. ...�J?w�
1 ..... !Vw•.�.�.-.art.n5Y Yyl�a.lYG:.4v/d TL � ...

THE I5'RIPARIAN SETBACK IS WANED BETWEEN THE
FOLLOWING LOTS, BUT DOCK FACILITIES SHALL NOT EXTENT
BEYOND THE LINE SHOWN: LOTS 3,4JPJ3J4J5J7JW & 20
NEW BULKHEAD
PROPOSED FILL LINE
TRACT ACREAGE 27.96 AC
j II I "THE STRAITS" PUBLIC ACCESS 1.00 AC
�EXISTINGI, BULKHEADI CEMETARY 0.97 AC
TO BE REMOVED i I ; RIGHT OF WAY 3.40 AC
I I qi a RESERVED BY 0.70 AC
I I I a°Eaweo rod'.. OWNER
COMMON AREA 5.40 AC
LOT AREA 15.23 AC
IJ °"9•m «,� �, .`o-" ' NO. LOTS 28
NIF AVE LOT SIZE .544 AC
MAXWELL ----------- ------- T.As -
'� ❑ � a 1'"S
PAVEMENT AREA 1.26 AC
5,Awl.....'1
® O
FUNTC&VETE°
E
5 y a x 7a
scrlr v naA��E
•••a^ •: ••• . EXISTIAG OVERHEAD .
--- SATED O INTERSECrOV
NEW RIW ARxERS rXND ROAD
SfS=VIEW CANE 111111f11I •/61
isslo
0
ID x TD SOff 1' I
t A..: I / / ® ' �'•• N . ` TRIANGLE y e
O ,
(-- ---� BROOKS CREEK x �INEcrxw • ,��'}tiq` I •``�`�
*" M.EN A39N16F
.zrvm •.Dravarcus / • vy MARKERS ND ROAD &
nARKERS POINT RDAD
0O1100
AQ9.Aii • •-•
®' LAMA ACTIVITIES
HARKBRS POINT
200' 100' O 200' 400'
e` aym N1 is DMOa�
' • HARBOR! IHI.ARD bRT M1A0 W/TH w1
41 p5 r. 1USN si%Ei
/ HARBOR OF RZFUU9
6a EASEMENT AD0°® rl.sa. r1.c. xze9e Don:
H/} OA RinBi COUNTY BROURp8«6 W] ?01 DJ\
.2 O O ' 11191 �z�,,ppnv a�DD MIPoA!' maAD I � s �� n • mwan �rm+esav+u ea. •n.o.m
PROJECT • PY707 f �° $ yy��xN a cm. r.c. ee99> rzonl
AaE mlvgn Irw TO T WENT PLANT �gyp" .�... °rD JOB D.is
SHEET • 3 OF 7� IaAe"U1 Z. 9cus -zoo

EX.CHANNEL MARKER }
I '
{ CURVE DATA:
EX. CHANNEL MARKER •1 CENTRAL ANGLE- 10 00 00/XOO
1• CAIM CHORD DlREC7I0N- N 76 02 47B85 W
i •eTA�r aroePsc,nn mw �H• �7-MM
' TANGENT- //a=
WAW
100 YR. FLOOD ELEV.- 7.0 MSL EC�AL- 4
COMMUNITY PANEL 3700 43 0729C TRACT ACREAGE - 2796 AC MIDDLE ORDINATE- 47844
REVISED AUGUST 19, 1985 1NUNBER OF LOTS -28
.M'94 •$ CENTRAL ANGLE- 714239.976
CHORD DIRECTION-
W- 63 05 52J27 W
R
AOR/5• 22831/2
EXISTING BULKHEAD r "THE STRAITS" h TAMGENµz65
T• 000
ss.-I.sl4 TO BE REMOVED CHORD• 267.46J8
0..1E EXTERNAL- 5.7im
IB1.W sezMP vsro ae ra Mvr rau MIDDLE ORDINATE- 432%`56
xv m
:� ,ea,: s3 T•'He sTr•r.ic , Rai "�'""` •3CENTRAL
NTTORD A LANGLE-
i Jo VO '- N 6952(12.0155 W
TANGENT- A75D000
' �_' © g a" •m' 4M YC Np CHORD- 209B936
4 '�y
- - - ' EXTERNAL- 16712N/F -• MIDDLE DINATE• IN03
MAXWELL 1 CENTRAL ACfE-
J 37 /9D0
O CHORD DIRECTION• N 69 5/16•gp W
—� .T _-_.%�a .. _ .._ 'iz �•TE�` .-.4 .. `� .i•_.`a •e uua 2 - DOD 0
19900d
a. r s6'°> -'. •s $ - Mn L EXTERNAL- 1-5"
.ate'..®•. I_vw
TI — ' - ?•. fay er[ . K CFO MIDDLE ORDINATE-
R1 T•xt - - my ishY Y --. t! TPoANG[E •5 CENTRAL ANGLE- 8 54 28079
i 6-j _. _ _ _ _ _ ' �' • CHORD DIRECTION N 67 /2 41SW W
9 EXl6ff/AG OVERHEAD •• ! ::
'N sW- K' ;•s"IOz. _ 1 PL11'ER-TO. BE -. •1 _. "Y INTERSECTION RADIUS- 12M70
a iR7 •_•�RELDCATED',T0 l &''E TANGENT- 00.0000
STRAITS VIEW LANE
�p ry xw P.IM 7\Y3// of .- -,{ § , c•.
0DD EXTERNAL- 3sw
o1Yw NG1
MIDDLE ORDINATE- 38770
i • a>erum v'O �•+,4' `• _ (' • 1 yr m •6 CENTRK ANGLE- 24 49 45235
�7 c _ •� 'vLiC.. ® >• `� fIg i CHORD DIRECTION'- N 75 /0 20.478 W
8B lF -/SACP
1• RAOVS- 34=51
% LENGTH- WB452 .v _ "•' ® ,•' - - k_ - - - TANGENT- 75,0000
xMM ???ky �•� -. �� CHORD- HCv/926
EXTERNAL- &073
MerP»ry GfAf - � C •. ��� 'br MIDDLE ORDINATE- 7%65
sei - 'hr: R, 'b+' I TRIANGLE
7a slcHT •7
' nrlor� �y ND� ' , w • -�_ -fl, ....---. TPoNMLE CHORDDIRECTION- S 85 355 47XJ W
f wev-z•r RAON/S- 4MM31
�w is NN �wv N°'�rav x�i izr ,, \. ' � • ' V IfJY LENGTH- 99-W8
I I t NM•zaav \/ - • _ ��. 88 IF -IFRCP TANGENT- 500000
<.: CHORD- 992932
�, BROOKS CREEKvE ® �:� INTERSECTION EXTERNAL- 29777
ocAt lars swL ^ •' -<� '� MIDDLE ORDINATE- 25L5�
TTP 87W STSTM LOCATION mrm s�aroua.EUA , >,,�, •• -O l _ •-•- ,' Yp ,a; r� HARKERS ARKERS POINT ROAD &
H A 02UDO POINT A0A0
arsM CANA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
_ sarls'ms \�\\f\IIIIIII
Nam.. ''., i••♦Rp ® AI N � A • �\\ � f..i.O..U.,^� iq''•.�,,�
HARgERS POINT
200' 100' o zoo' 400' Lan.n
16T2o]3r 1-' I 10 • I♦ CL CLTCE MIMIS ..m
• • }LREER9 ISLAND
jiQLT �•• ♦ 2106 V. M $m T
,r RE ,NyMu'l311'r HARBOR OP FUGE m 1• an - r 1.19. M.C.
1 n'
S C A L E : 1 " = 2 O 01 Nssarm
»x Hn cARTeaEr COUNTY JQp 1 = �a f ,,,vl z,T� 01
0
PROJECT •: PH707 N6°' •v Sd { lU max ... ore •o rf m •�rrovm
PROUDD'R Pd
xrsonc
SHEET • 2 OF 7 n4aE MarII eT,Orr .e. ALe

! 4� 1 - I jw� ".
4

m
T
rn
07
! b2 )`
i O
NORTH RIVER NIF
16
17
p/g
HRIGGS Is I6
BROOKS CREEK u
19 li
N/F MOORE m
FUTURE DEVELOPMEN - =1
� L
rwvaam a 10
ee,eoo ate.
�YTt�1TQ =6 � 9
ru6nml= ss
rmnr =
M
n
6
a
6
M
D
W N/F CARTERET CO.
HARBOR OF REFUGE
POINT 500' 250' O 500' 1000' (PROPOSED) N CARP
HAR%ft 16 jai
SCALE= 1" - 500' _ :a SEAL
PROJECT PM707 ?33ti3
SHEET • 1 OF 7 _ ..
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
SHEET 1............ COVER SHEET
SHEET 2............ HARKER'S POINT SITE PLAN
SHEET 3............ HARKERS POINT CAMA ACTIVITIES
SHEET 4............ MARINA FILL PLAN
SHEET 5............ FORCE MAIN PLAN
SHEET 6............ PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS PLAN
SHEET 7............ DETAIL SHEET
NOTE:
1.)THIS SHEET PROVIDED TO FAMILAR REVIEW PERSONEL
WITH LOCATION OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH ADJOINING
CHARACTERISTICS. THIS INFORMATION WAS SCANNED FROM
AERIAL TAX PARCEL MAP AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL SURVEY
OF ADJOINING PARCELS.
BARKERS
POINT
CEMETARY
STRAITS
COVER SHEET
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HAAI K EIS
PO"'INT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS
DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
RDC
WILSON, N.C. 27858
DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED
3 STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
DATE:
NOgHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557
1 2/20/96
( 247-7479
SCALE:
ONALD D. CULLIPHER E.
1 "= 500'

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY /
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS / 5U-
P.O. BOX 1890 e/
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 1�
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
March 13, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199501535
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources 8 L
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of Robert L. Moore for Department of the
Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill
material in approximately 0.5 acre of vegetated wetland and nonvegetated
shallow water bottom in the Straits, for the development of the Harkers Point
subdivision, off S.R. 1335, in Harkers island, Carteret County, North
Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our
administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification
has been obtained or waived.
According to our administrative regulations, 60 days is reasonable for
State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by May 13, 1996, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned at telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffrey H. Richter
Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
PA,aaE aP 0 Ragded Papw

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
u�•:�
March 13, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199501535
Mr. Robert L. Moore
205 Bleachers Brook Lane
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Dear Mr. Moore:
On February 11, 1991, we renewed general permit No. 198000291 (copy
enclosed), which provides Federal authorization for construction activities
that receive authorization from the State of North Carolina.
A review of your application received January 17, 1995, for Department
of the Army authorization to place fill material in approximately 0.5 acre of
vegetated wetland and nonvegetated shallow water bottom in the Straits, for
the development of the Harkers Point subdivision, off S.R. 1335, in Barkers
Island, Carteret County, North Carolina, indicates it to be a candidate for
Federal authorization under this general permit. Accordingly, the
administrative processing of your application will he accomplished by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. Comments from Federal review
agencies will be furnished to the State.
If your application must be withdrawn from this general permit process
for any reason, you will be informed regarding its further management. If
there are no unresolved differences in State -Federal positions or policies,
the final action taken on your application by the State will result in your
receiving written notice from us that your application is consistent with the
general permit and you may commence your activity. Only after receiving such
confirmation should you begin work.
On February 6, 1990, the DA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to
determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean
Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding
impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the least damaging,
practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to
minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any
remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To
enable us to process your application in full compliance with this MOA, we
request that you provide the following additional information:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are
available only if the proposed work is the least environmentally damaging,
practicable alternative. Please furnish information regarding any other
alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for which you have
applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least
damaging to water or wetland areas.
Pnn,ed on 9 Re ded Pape,

b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical
steps to reduce wetland losses. Please show all that you have done,
especially regarding development and modification of plans and proposed
construction techniques, to reduce adverse impacts.
c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practical mitigation will be
required for all unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after all appropriate
and practical minimization has been employed. Please show your plan to
mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of waters or wetlands or provide
information as to the absence of any such appropriate and practical measures.
This information is essential to our expeditious processing of your
application and it should be forwarded to us by April 2, 1996. Also, a copy
of this information must be sent to the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management to enable them to adequately evaluate your
application for a Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act.
Your application, pursuant to Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act and
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, has been assigned Action ID No. 199501535.
It will be coordinated by the undersigned. I am available at telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffrey H. Richter
Project.Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office _
Enclosure

Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental
Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
3441 Arendell Street
Post Office Box 769
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ri
WiLMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS GO
P.O. BOX 1800 �r
ro
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROUNA28402-1880
ATTEM�•
VEN gN CF
�n\ck�C.h a , �q�,(0
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 1� ` 50 � S 3 S Applicant t l be�� 10 �Oor �'
Waterway
C
S�ro;ts e3rook -"Lcounty Ccchoce� Type Work
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine
Service, NOAA
Fivers Island
Beaufort, North
Fisheries
Carolina 28516
Field Supervisor
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr, Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section -Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
R
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. John Parker
F�
Division of Coastal Manageme�� K� v
North Carolina Department
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources O� �v�PV
Post Office Box 27687 7687t�P
Raleigh, North Carolina 27 m
Mo1.�h�4a C,�y Regional Office
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
7o5t O��'C nL�`oX �
I me � e�� �C -),%
Gentlemen:
1, the
Furs, at to State Field tion Dnvesti9atGion9Report iCsseenclo ed general
commentsrocessinq
and/Or
agreement, g �S L
e appreciated on or before
cecommendations would bC \
Questions or comments may be addressed to
( 1M .s}o r Field Office, telephone (q)O) 1_ =, 3 -
Regulatory Branch,
Enclosure
Sincerely,
l Csr��
Jeffrey H. Richter
Project Manager Field Office
Wilmington Regulatory

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
Mr. Todd Miller
North Carolina Coastal Federation
3609 Highway 24
Newport, North Carolina 28570
A �
August 20, 1996 p E H N FZ
RE: Major CAMA Permit Application, Harkers Point Subdivision, Harkers Island, Carteret
County.
Dear Mr. Miller:
Thank you for your March 18, 1996 letter expressing your concerns on the above
referenced CAMA permit application. The Division of Coastal Management shares your
concerns over protecting water quality and fisheries habitat in all coastal waters of North
Carolina, and we have closely examined the issues raised in your letter. As you may be aware,
the Division requested that the Carteret County Health Department and the N.C. Division of
Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch, comment on the suitability of
the proposed wastewater. treatment plant site. Both of these agencies responded that the proposed
wastewater treatment plant, with a capacity of 13,440 gallons per day, met with their agencies
conditional approval, and the appropriate wastewater treatment plant permits have been issued.
The applicant has also obtained a Water Quality Certification and a Stormwater Management
Plan Certification from the Division of Water Quality.
Because the State and Federal review of the project was favorable, and the applicant has
obtained the necessary wastewater, stormwater and water quality authorizations, the proposed
project has been determined to comply with the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Subsequently, the Division has issued a CAMA Permit for the proposed action, and we are
providing a copy of this permit to you for your information. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sinc ly,
C)gi N. checter, Director
Divisi f Coastal Management
cc: R.L. Moore
Charles Jones, DCM - Morehead City
P.O. Box 27687, w�FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N%q CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-229310% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
Mr. Ralph Zeiss
Sound Sense, Inc
P.O. Drawer 429
Nags Head, North Carolina 27959
August 20, 1996 p E H N FZ
RE: Major CAMA Permit Application, Harkers Point Subdivision, Harkers Island, Carteret
County.
Dear Mr. Zeiss:
Thank you for your March 23, 1996 letter expressing your concerns on the above
referenced CAMA permit application. The Division of Coastal Management shares your
concerns over protecting water quality and fisheries habitat in all coastal waters of North
Carolina, and we have closely examined the issues raised in your letter. As you may be aware,
the Division requested that the Carteret County Health Department and the N.C. Division of
Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch, comment on the suitability of
the proposed wastewater treatment plant site. Both of these agencies responded that the proposed
wastewater treatment plant, with a capacity of 13,440 gallons per day, met with their agencies
conditional approval, and the appropriate wastewater treatment plant permits have been issued.
The applicant has also obtained a Water Quality Certification and a Stormwater Management
Plan Certification from the Division of Water Quality.
Because the State and Federal review of the project was favorable, and the applicant has
obtained the necessary wastewater, stormwater and water quality authorizations, the proposed
project has been determined to comply with the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Subsequently, the Division has issued a CAMA Permit for the proposed action, and we are
providing a copy of this permit to you for your information. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sinc,pTly,
R er Nrchecter, Director
Div ' l Management
cc: R.L. Moore
Charles Jones, DCM - Morehead City
_A
P.O. Box 27687, NV WC FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 1, An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
,Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
August 21, 1996
Harkers Point Subdivision
c/o R. L. Moore
2105 W. Nash Street
Wilson, NC 27858
Dear Sir:
A�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�
1DEHNF-Z
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where applicable,
the State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff -colored form) is
retained by you and it must be available on site when the project is inspected for compliance. Please sign both the
original and the copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed envelope. Signing the permit and proceeding
means you have waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you may request a hearing pursuant to NCGS 113A-121.1
or 113-229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance with NCGS Chapter 150B with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 11666, Raleigh, NC 27611, [phone] within twenty (20) days of this
decision on your permit. You should also be aware that if another qualified party submits a valid objection to the
issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days, the matter must be resolved prior to work initiation. The Coastal
Resources Commission makes the final decision on any appeal.
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work must be
carried out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future maintenance require
additional approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review all project plans, as approved.
If you are having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to be sure that he fully understands all
permit requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we request that
you complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if questions arise concerning
permit conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact Department personnel at any time for
assistance. By working in accordance with the permit, you will be helping to protect our vitally important coastal
resources.
fVery sincerely,
John . Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
JRP:jr/amw
Enclosure
P.O. Box 27687, ,� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 V An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice919-733-2293 U71�1111 50% recycled/l 0% post -consumer paper

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
REPLY TO
ATn:NnON OF _
April 8, 1996 .,2 1
Regulatory Branch '���
Action ID No. 199501535
N?VL
61 th1j;
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment, L
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
Reference the application of Mr. Robert L. Moore for a Department of the
Army (DA) permit to construct a bulkhead, place fill material in 0.02 acre of
vegetated wetlands and 0.48 acre of non -vegetated wetlands to eliminate a
manmade boatramp, a basin and a canal and construct a pier on The Straits,
Harkers Point Subdivision, Harkers Island, Carteret County, North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented
by the application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State
authorization:
a. All work authorized'by this permit must be done in -strict compliance
with the permit plans.
b. The new bulkhead, along Lots Nos. 13, 14, 15, and 16, will be
�Lr N'II positioned in strict accordance with permit plans.- To prevent an
4).At unintentional violation of this authorization, representatives of the North
Carolina Division of Coastal Management and the Corps of Engineers will be
available to stake the alignment before construction.
(0/0"A c. ,Prior to the placement of any fill material in the canal or basin
area, the new bulkhead will be constructed and lined with a filter material to
prevent turbidity and/or sedimentation in The Straits.
d. The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in
trace quantities. Metal products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will
not be used.
e. No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free
J use by the public of all navigable waters at or next to the authorized work.
Use of the permitted activity must not interfere with the public's right to
free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
f. The permittee will maintain the authorized work in good condition and
in concordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. The permittee is
not relieved of•this requirement.if heabandonsthe permitted activity without
having it transferred to a third party.

-2-
g. The activity will be conducted in a way that prevents a significant
increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction -related
discharge. Increases such that the turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NTU's or
less are not considered significant.
h. Prior to any development on Lots Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 9, the permittee
will complete coordination with the North Carolina Division of Archives and
History. If significant archaeological features are exposed, this agency will
be allowed reasonable time to document, record and/or recover features before
initiation of any development.
i. The permittee will not hinder access by the public to the Harker's
Point Cemetery.
j. This Department of the Army permit does not make unnecessary the need
to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law.
k. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive
privileges.
Questions or comments may be addressed to me at telephone [phone].
sincerely,
J�Je a Ric er
Pro ct Manager
Wilmington Field Office
Regulatory Branch

-3-
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Charles Jones
.. Morehead City Regional Office
... North Carolina Division
of Coastal Management
Post Office Box 769
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
6
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the
community of Harkers Island, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 155-1, P-7 1984: 38-1215, V-17
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2725900 Y: 359500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-8-96
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 2-20-96
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Limited Transitional and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, CW & ES
(C) Water Dependent: Yes and No
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing -
Planned - 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment system
(F) Type of Structures: Existing -
Planned - Future residential development w/associated piers
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0' to moderate
Source - personnel observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
± 880 ft.2
Spartina alterniflora
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
± 21000 ft.z
ex.boat basin bottom
(C) Other
± 5 ac.
High ground
(land disturbed)
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ± 5.5 ac.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to develop a 28 lot subdivision at a site adjacent to
SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Harkers Point
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The applicants property is a ± 60 acre tract of land
located on the northwestern end of Harkers Island and on the west side of SR 1335
immediately south of the Harkers Island Bridge. The subject of this permit application
is a ± 28 acre portion of this tract which is proposed to be developed into a
subdivision and a 1.5 acre site which is to be used for sewage disposal. The
subdivision tract is bordered on the north by the Straits and on the south by Brooks
Creek, which is also the entrance channel going into the County's Harbor of Refugee
and abuts the Harbor on the southeast side. The majority of the high ground property
consists of woodlands with pine and oak as the dominate species. A dirt drive bisects
the property and provides access to the adjoining property owner located to the west of
the project site. A varying border of coastal and 404 wetlands exists along the
shoreline. On the northeast side (fronting the Straits) a ± 5 to 50' wide sandy beach
area exists along a portion of the shoreline. The remaining shoreline shows signs of
slight to moderate erosion with an erosion scarp having developed. The beach area has
been used for many years as a popular swim beach for the locals in Harkers Island and
the surrounding communities. A ± 150' wide x ± 140' long to -9' mean low water
(MLV) basin was excavated into the interior of the property along its northwest
property line around the late 1960's to early 70's. The previous land owner requested
a Dredge and Fill permit to connect the basin into the waters of the Straits. A permit
was issued but it is unclear whether it authorized the entrance channel. According to
historic photography, there was, however, a water connection established from the
basin to the Straits. Today, the bulkhead around the basin has washed away or is
deteriorated to the point of being non-functional. The mouth of the basin has shoaled
in to the point where there is only a small trickle of water flowing out of the basin into
the Straits during low tide conditions. A 6' to 20' border of coastal wetlands vegetated
primarily with spartina altern flora has volunteered along the southern shoreline of the
basin and a ± 10' wide border of spartina alterniflora exist along the Straits just west
of the basin entrance. Scattered clumps of oysters are also located at the mouth of the
basin. Numerous amounts of building and other debris have been deposited along the
shoreline of the basin throughout the years.
The site has been identified in the past as an area with archaeological potential as well
as having an old cemetery existing on the property. The Harkers Point Cemetery has
not been maintained in recent years and contains the grave sites of many early residents
of Harkers Island. In 1995, the applicant hired an archeological research firm and a
"Phase lI study" was performed to identify any additional unmarked graves outside of
the cemetery proper and to examine the site for any prehistoric or historical
archaeological sites with significant remains that might be eligible for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places. The results of the survey have been
summarized in a report to the applicant and a copy has been provided to the Division
of Coastal Management and the Division of Archives and History. Anyone wishing to
review the document should contact the Division of Coastal Management's Morehead
City office.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE k3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 28 acres into
a 28 lot subdivision with the typical lot size being ± 'h acre in size. Access to the
lots will be provided by two paved private roads which will have direct access to the
Harkers Island Road (SR 1335). A 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment plant with
associated subsurface disposal fields is proposed on a ± 1.5 acre site ± 2,000' south
of the subdivision site. This wastewater facility will not only service this development
but will be available for the future development of the remainder of the property. The
wastewater will be transported to the disposal site by the use of individual pump tanks
with a force main being installed within the right of way of SR 1335. The 4" PVC
force main will buried ± 3' below the existing grade of the roadbed and within the
Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) along an area adjacent to
the County's Harbor of Refuge. Early into the development of this project, the
applicant consulted with state and federal review agencies concerning the possibilities
of re-establishing the marina basin and providing an access channel into the Straits.
Because of the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the access channel
alignment, the applicant abandoned that concept and is now requesting a permit to fill
in the basin to the elevation of adjoining uplands. The shoreline of the Straits
immediately adjacent to the fill area would be bulkhead at the mean high water line and
landward of coastal wetlands. The deteriorated breakwater/bulkhead along the Straits
shoreline would also be removed. The basin filling would result in the loss of ± 880
ft.2 of spartina alternflora marsh and ± 2,100 ft.z of shallow to deep bottom areas
within the basin itself. The development of the subdivision will require the grading of
± 3.4 acres in association with the streets and it's right of way. The construction of
homesites will be left up to the individual purchaser with the low density stormwater
requirements (under Environmental -Management Commission rules) limiting the built
upon area for each lot to 30%. Grassed swales are to be located between lots 14 and
15 and lots 4 and 5. These swales will provide drainage relief from the proposed road
system with the terminal ends being located near the shoreline of the Straits. In
addition to the 28 lots, the applicant is proposing to dedicate ± 5.4 acres as a
"Common Area", ± .97 acres as a cemetery site and a ± .9 acre site for beach
access. The proposed beach access site would be dedicated to Carteret County if they
are willing to accept and maintain the area. A portion of the beach access site appears
to be part of the causeway which was created in the construction of the Harkers Island
Bridge. For the most part this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of
the presence of riprap and coastal wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access site
is a sandy beach area. It can also be anticipated that many of the future lot owners
will want to construct piers into the Straits and within the Brooks Creek and the access
channel leading into the County's Harbor of Refugee. The applicant has positioned the
pier alignment on lot 3 to the western property line so that the majority of the beach
area on that lot and to the east will be free from obstacles.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE N4
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the development of
a 28 acre tract of land into a 28 lot subdivision with associated Common Area.
Wetland impacts will be limited to ± 880 ft.z of primarily spartina alterniflora which
exist within the human made boat basin and ± 21,000 ft.z of estuarine bottom area.
The filling would also require approx 1,500 yds' of upland fill being placed below the
mean high water line of the basin. While there will be a loss of estuarine bottom,
potential negative water quality impacts from the existing basin would be eliminated.
The scattered amount of oysters at the entrance channel could be easily relocated
outside the fill area and into the open waters of the Straits. Approximately 3.4 acres
will be disturbed in associated with the installation of the road system for the
development. Sewage will be pumped off site to a ± 1.5 acre tract of land located
south of the project site. The applicant has indicated that the approval for this
wastewater treatment plant has not received approval from the Division of Health
Services. Potable water will be supplied by individual wells. The applicant has
designed the development to comply with the low density stormwater rules with no
more than 30% of the individual lots being built upon. Two drainage swales are
proposed and will provide drainage from the road towards the Straits. As a result of
the archaeological findings, a Phase III evaluation is scheduled for the summer of 1996
on lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The applicant has indicated that no development would occur
on these lots until after the study is completed. It can be anticipated that some of the
future lot owners will build piers extending into the navigable waters of the Straits and
Brooks Creek. The specific location of these piers will be left up to the individual
property owners except for lot 3 where the pier will be constructed adjacent to the
western property line. It is not anticipated that any closure of shellfishing waters
would occur within the Straits and the waters of Brooks Creek are already closed. As
a result of the interest shown by the locals, the applicant is setting aside ± .97 acres
for the Harker's Point Cemetery. They have acknowledged that while the proposed
road and development will be private, access to the cemetery by the public will not be
prohibited. An approx..9 acre beach access site is proposed to be given to Carteret
County. A portion of this area would appear to be within the causeway area created
when the Harkers Island Bridge was constructed. A significant portion of this
causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of previous riprap placement and
the existence of wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access area is primarily a
sand beach which is separated from the adjacent high ground by a 404 wetland area.
As mentioned before, this area has historically been used as a popular beach site for
many of the Down East communities and is intensively used during the summer. The
construction of future piers along the shoreline will prohibit the use of off -road
vehicles from using the beach and will impeded pedestrian access to some degree
beyond the dedicated beach access site.
PREPARED BY: Charles Jones
DATE: February 29, 1996

Narrative tEB 2 U 19%
Harker's Point Major CAMA Permit t�
� j�►►wM►M►►►N►wwAwwMw
HTB Associates, L.L.C. proposes to develop a 27.96 acre parcel of land on the northwestern
end of Harken; Island. The proposed Harkees Point single family subdivision will consist of 28 lots.
All lots will be either waterfront or water view and will allow for a large common area protecting the
integrity of the property leading to the Harkees Point Cemetery and the Maxwell property to the west.
The project has additional property to the south which has not had its development planned
with the exception of a 60,000 gpd tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields.
This system is currently being reviewed by the On -Site Sewage Branch.
During the planning process leading to the Major CAMA Permit submittal, several issues came
to light and were addressed as follows:
Harker's Point Cemetery
Harker's Point Cemetery has been an umnaintained cemetery containing the grave sites of
many early residents of Harkees Island. Following site evaluations by Mr. John Clauser of the N.C.
Department of Archives and History, many of the previously documented sites were located and the
proposed boundary of the cemetery was established.
Local citizens have indicated their desire to form the Harkers Point Preservation Committee to
manage and maintain the historical significance and heritage of this island cemetery. The developer
has encouraged and has appreciated the assistance provided by the island residents. While the
proposed new roadway construction is to be private, access to the cemetery is a right conceded to the
public. The developer will continue to work with the preservation group to restore the cemetery site.
Archaeological Findings
Following the disclosure of a study conducted by Thomas Loftfield in 1969 which found
artifacts along the north shoreline of this tract, Mr. Thomas Hargrove of Archaeological Research
Consultants,Inc. was retained to conduct an assessment of the tract. His report is attached. Phase III
archaeological evaluations are scheduled for this summer on Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9.
Fello tP the Previously Constructed Inland Marina
The original plan for this development included interior lots, which were required by local
ordinance to have adequate water access. The site has an inland basin marina which, through lack of
maintenance, has had its access channel silt -in and the bulkhead has deteriorated. Early discussions
with state and federal personnel indicated that with the presence of SAV in the channel alignment,
permitting would be difficult to re -dredge to the facility.
Since it is not likely that the inland basin would be permitted to be reconstructed, it is
desirable to fill the basin and associated wetlands that were created at the boat Temp and re-establish
the site to its original grade.
Public Use of the Beach
Prescriptive use of the beach at the north end of the tract has been a consideration of our
design. Lots 1 and 2 are to be water view without riparian rights to construct piers. Lot 3 will be
restricted to pier construction along the western property line.
The resulting property of 1.00 acres is to be donated to Carteret County and used for a public
beach access.

T
F
JIM
CROSSpSECTIO
(N.T.S. )
e

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL/PROCESSING RECORD
A) APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) COUNTY: Carteret
LOCATION OF PROJECT: adj. SR1335, Brooks Ck. and the Straits, community of Harkers Island
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: February 20, 1996
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached - NO To Be Forwarded - YES
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached - NO To Be Forwarded - YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Charles Jones ,12, TRICT OFFICE: Morehead
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW d
B) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED INRA `GWR, � 1996 EEREC'D:$ 50 oe�ko ,
6' EMEN `
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: END ���p6OF N E DATE:
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D: 9 5 EED REC'D: j
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: ON: 3 --. 4— 5�
C)
75 DAY DEADLINE: 150 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE: - _ U STATE DUE DATE: i 2 P - %�
FEDERAL DUE DATE: / FED. COMMENTS REC'D: q - � -1-f 4 _
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE ✓ DENY DRAFT ON F-17 y�
AGENCY
DATE COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management Dist. Office
6 - /� .S- G/ G
Div. of Community Assistance
`
Land Quality Section
Div. of Env. Management 06-VA I
7 , 3D-��
State Property Office
Div. of Archives & History
-5-
Div. of Env. Health
Div. of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Div. of Water Resources
Div. of Marine Fisheries

TO: Doug Huggett
FROM: Charles Jones
SUBJECT:
Comments and Recommendations - Harkers Poi
DATE: June 24, 1996
I have no objections to the issuance of a permit for this
development with the following conditions applying:
Public Access
1. Title to the 1 acre beach access site (as identified on Sheet
6 of 7) will be transferred to Carteret County on or before
December 31, 1996.
2. Appropriate signs indicating the boundaries of the public
J beach access site is permissible. The signs, post locations,
etc. must be approved by the Division of Coastal Management
prior to installation. The fencing -off or the placement of
other structures which prohibit lateral access to other
portions of the beach is not allowed.
` 3. The location, length and design of the pier for lot No. 3
shall be as shown of Sheet 6 of 7.
4. No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the full
and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or
adjacent to the authorized work.
5. The design of all piers in and adjacent to the Straits shall
be constructed in such a manner to allow for the reasonable
movement of the public along the beachfront area. Examples
might include the piers being elevated to allow for pedestrian
passage underneath the structure or designed to terminate near
the waters edge so that passage can be made on the beach area
and around the pier.
6. The construction of piers in Brooks Channel shall be designed
if so as not to impact existing navigation into the Harbor of
Refugee. Piers constructed on lots 27 and 28 shall not extend
any further waterward than the existing pier structures
located on and adjacent to these lots.
Boat Basin Filling
7. Prior to undertaking any filling, all live oysters within the
boat basin area shall be relocated to adjacent intertidal
shoreline areas.

S. Prior to undertaking any filling of the boat basin area, a
bulkhead will be installed. The bulkhead alignment will
` approximate the mean high water level at the time of
construction.
The alignment of the proposed bulkhead must be staked by a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management (DCM)
within a maximum of thirty (30) days prior to the start of
construction. Failure to initiate construction within thirty
(30) days, or erosion of the shoreline by adverse weather
conditions, will require the alignment to be re -staked by DCM
within a maximum of thirty (30) days prior to the new expected
start of construction.
10. The bulkhead must be solid and constructed of treated wood,
concrete slabs, metal sheet piles, or other suitable materials
approved by Department personnel. No excavation is permitted,
except for that which may be required for the construction of
the bulkhead wall, riprap, deadman cables, etc. This permit
does not authorize any excavation waterward of the approved
alignment.
11. All backfill material will be obtained from a highground
source and confined behind the permitted bulkhead.
12. The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants,
except in trace quantities. Metal products, organic
materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
General Conditions
13. Any future development on the remaining portions of the tract
will require a modification of this permit.
14. Access to the cemetery shall not be unduly restricted or
impeded.
CC: Preston Pate
Jeff Richter, COE

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
February 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Kathy B. Vinson, District Planner
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
KA
AF�:' 1 t
�EHNF�
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the
Carteret County
REC E0
APR 101996
COASTAL
MANAGEMENT
to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point
of Harkers Island,
Please indicate below your office's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by March
21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at (919) 726-
7021. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed. �e�l�/r 4iire�i��✓
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are incorporated.
See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED dfil DATE
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

TO: John Parker
FROM: Kathy Vinson
SUBJECT: Consistency Determination, Major Permit Application,
Harkers Point (HBT Associates, L.L.C.), Harkers Island,
Carteret County
DATE: April 8, 1996
Harkers Point Subdivision is proposed for development at a site
adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community
of Harkers Island, Carteret County. The subdivision will consist of
28 lots. A 1.5 acre site associated with the development will be
used for sewage disposal.
AECs impacted by the project include the Estuarine Shoreline,
Estuarine Waters and Coastal Wetlands. 1404' wetlands are also
located on the project site and may be impacted by the proposed
work. The site contains a cemetery and has been identified as an
area with archaeological potential. Waters at the site are
classified as SA and are open to the harvesting of shellfish. The
area is not a Primary Nursery Area.
The Field Investigation Report notes that the proposed project area
has historically been used as a beach access site for many of the
area residents and is heavily used during the summer. The project
applicant has set aside a .9 acre portion of the site for beach
access and plans to give the site to Carteret County.
I have reviewed this proposal for consistency with the 1991
Carteret County Land Use Plan (LUP) Update, as amended September
24, 1993, and offer the following comments.
The general area of the project is classified as Limited
Transition, while the AECs and any 1404, wetlands impacted by the
work are classified as Conservation.
Carteret County's intentions regarding development of Conservation
classified areas are discussed in the policy sections of the Plan.
Applicable policies contained in the LUP include Resource
Production and Management Policies for Marine Resource Areas (Page
IV-11). These policies state Carteret County's support for the 7H
Use Standards for Estuarine Waters, with certain exceptions, none
of which appear to be applicable to this proposal.
The Coastal Wetlands Conservation classification is discussed on
Pages V-2 and V-3 of the amended Plan. Except as specifically
prohibited in the policies section of the Plan, development allowed

by the 7H Use Standards may occur in areas identified as coastal
wetlands by the Division of Coastal Management. I can find no
policy regarding coastal wetlands in the amended Plan which would
appear to prohibit this project, provided the requirements set
forth in 7H can be satisfied.
The Land Classification System of the LUP also addresses 1404'
wetlands (Page V-3). The Plan notes that concentrated areas of
'404' wetlands, as shown on the Land Classification Map, are
classified as Conservation. Policies in the Plan strictly limit any
development in these Conservation classified '404' wetland areas.
The Plan goes on, however, to note that 1404' wetlands, as
identified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but not delineated
on the Land Classification Map, are subject only to the applicable
federal regulations, and not to the policy statements included
elsewhere in the LUP. Wetlands located on the project site are not
delineated as such on the Land Classification Map, and are
therefore only subject to federal regulations.
Applicable policies contained in the LUP include those for
Cultural/Historic Resources, which are discussed on Page IV-6.
Policies in this section state the County's support for the
identification of significant archaeological sites. The LUP states
that the County will coordinate all public works projects, housing
code enforcement and redevelopment projects with the NC Division of
Archives and History. For public works projects, the Plan
specifically states that the County will ensure the preservation of
significant sites. Although the Plan does not specify private
projects such as this proposal in its intentions to preserve such
sites, Carteret County clearly supports coordination with the
Division of Archives and History for projects proposed in areas
with archaeological potential.
Policies for Package Treatment Plants (Page IV-6) state that the
County will not oppose the construction of state -approved package
treatment plants in areas not provided with central sewer service.
Carteret County supports requirement of a specific contingency plan
specifying how ongoing private operation and maintenance of the
plant will be provided.
Policies regarding Residential, Commercial and Industrial
Development Impacts on Resources (Page IV-10) allow residential
development meeting the 7H Use Standards in estuarine shoreline
areas.
Resource Production and Management Policies for Recreation
Resources (Page IV-9) discuss Carteret County's attitude towards
water access. The County supports the development of additional
estuarine and ocean shoreline access areas to ensure adequate
shoreline access within all areas of the County. Carteret County
will cooperate with municipalities and state and federal agencies
to secure such access, in particular areas that.have traditionally
been used by the public. As noted above, the area of this project
has traditionally been used by many of the Down East communities

for water access and the applicant proposes to give a water access
site to the County.
Economic and Community Development Policies for Estuarine Access
are discussed on Page IV-15 and support the state's shoreline
access policies as set forth in NCAC 15A Subchapter 7M. Tourism
Policies contained in this section of the LUP on Page IV-16 also
state support for projects that will increase public access to
shoreline areas.
Based on the above policies, this project appears to be consistent
with the amended 1991 Carteret County Land Use Plan, provided all
state and federal requirements can be satisfied. However, it is
recommended that any CAMA permit which is issued for the project be
conditioned to ensure continued public water access, in accordance
with the County's policies regarding recreation resources and
public water access.
CC: Preston Pate
Charles Jones
Katrina Marshall

• State of North Carolina LWWAA
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [D E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Bruce L. Freeman, Director
21 March 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker, Jr.
FROM: P.A. WojciechowskiiV
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application
Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
Attached is the Division's reply for the above referenced project. If you have any
questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
PAW/bc
/YF 7( ,-,
'14,9 f i
�ffgNgCF�f� ""b
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

" State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
February 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. Bruce L. Freeman, Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
A 7"'
74JL
C) FE F1
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
MUM TUSUBLANDS;
Project Location: adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the community of Harkers Island,
Carteret County
Proposed Project: to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
March 21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
/ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
W I/ This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency ob°ects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendeil St.. Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources AJa
Division of Marine Fisheries
A�
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Bruce L. Freeman, Director
21 March 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker
FROM: P.A. Wojciechowski -JA
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT APPLICATION
Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
The subject project has been reviewed, the following comments by the Division of
Marine Fisheries are provide pursuant to General Statute 113-131. The two areas of
concern from a public trust standpoint are the traditional uses of the Carteret County
Harbor of Refuge at Brooks Creek and the traditional use of the beach along the shoreline
of the Straits.
The Carteret County Harbor of Refuge is an important area for the residents of
Harkers Island, access to and use of must not be restricted in any way. It is
recommended that no piers be allowed on lots 24 through 28 or that piers, if allowed, be
placed parallel to the shoreline thus limiting any obstructions in the narrow portion of
Brooks Creek.
The beach area along the Straits has been traditionally used by the residents of
Harkers Island and the continued use of this area as a beach should not be terminated. The
access area along the sandy area of the Department of Transportation right-of-way should
remain open. A portion of the access area is part of the Department of Transportation's
right-of-way which was constructed when the bridge was built. It is recommended that
this area be clearly shown on all plats which show the development of this area.
PAW/bc
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MEMORANDUM
To:
Ski Wojciechowski
From:
Louis Daniel
Subject:
CAMA/DREDGE AND FILL: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
Date:
20 March, 1996
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries INC DMF) are
provided pursuant to General Statute 113-131. The proposed project on Harkers Island meets the
approval of this agency. However, we feel that it is necessary to make comments on the proposed
work.
North Carolina DMF staff discussed the potential, biological impacts of the proposed project,
and based on the information presented in the Field Investigation Report, can foresee little biological
impact on the surrounding area. The absence of marketable quantities of shellfish in this area result
in our having no objection to the filling of the existing marina basin. It should be realized that the
waters off the north beach (lots 1-16) are open to clam kicking during winter.
Our primary concern is with the proposed wastewater treatment plant and the submerged
aquatic vegetation that surrounds the project site. Additional information is requested that addresses
the developers plans for the transport and disposal of the wastewater. Finally, DMF will be very
hesitant to approve of any additional permit requests that disrupt or disturb the surrounding water
quality or submerged aquatic vegetation in future developments of this area.

State -of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1996
P. A. "Ski" Wojciechowski
Division of Marine Fisheries
John Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
IDFEE HNR
CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
MAR 19
IW-PUB. TUSUBLANDS
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkes Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a subdivision in Harkers Island.
r
REC& EO
AAR 25.i996
WAStAL
MANAGEMENT
Please indicate below your agency's position or findings on the proposed project as it relates to
matters of public trust. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, contact John
Parker at 733-2293 or the DCM field representative for the project. This form should be used
only for tracking and intra-agency commenting.
REPLY There are no known public trust conflicts with the project location or
There appear to be public trust conflicts that require additional
investigation. Approximately _ days additional review time is needed.
�Itis commended that changes be made to the project to reduce or
eliminate public trust conflicts, as discussed in the attached memo.
Signed
Cx'P
i� �� is Ho � T�fc
i�o.
� 0 7-x�,F
Date 3 Lo
r%11.0 /J/%.f/l � ev�cy /r��.�F/✓Sft�cf' Tif��' /.tvor.��r •.r-:r ,df/�G.K�or.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%postconsumer paper

State of North Carolina MAP 0 4 1996b� � �O°�
Department of Environment, \ ' •
Health and Natural Resources-------------------------- o
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor r� -
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N FR
Roger N. Schecter, Director
February 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
J J
MAR 0 4 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEME
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review �019999
Co
Applicant: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) HANq�f��N6
Project Location: adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the commumtrr f HATkeAN4
Carteret County - --
Proposed Project: to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
March 21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons describeI—IL-
P.O.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
JamesR Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Fbwas, Secretary
A. Presto n Fb w a rd , Jr., P.E., D ire c to r
1�
�EH N II
July 24, 1996
Carteret County
DWQ Project # 960226
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. R. L. Moore
c/o Harris and Associates
2105 West Nash Street
Wilson, NC 27858
Dear Mr. Moore:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.02 acres of wetlands and 0.48 acres of waters for the purpose of
developing a residential subdivision and filling an existing man-made basin at SR 1335, as you described in your
application dated 4 March 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number 3025.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this approval to be valid, you
must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. ✓do�..y s;r �• U;k.✓ ; Pr••, aF//„ty � ,,//
1) That a silt curtain be installed across the mouth of the basin and other erosion controls be in 6e 0. h,
place prior to any earth movement in the area.
2) That the tilled area in stabilized with vegetation immediately after filling.
3) That all fill material be from a clean upland source, free from toxic material.
4) That the project be done in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate
construction area to exceed 25 NTU.
5) That no groundwater lowering ditches shall be constructed with direct outlets to surface waters.
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box
27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone John Donley at 919-733-1786. - -
Sincerely,
/ � 1
it Howard, Jr. P.E. C) ✓U��3�£��ED
Attachment �p MA,yAAo
/A
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers f
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office NT /
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files 8
John Parker; DCM
960226.Itr
Division of Water Quality , Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda C. Sewall, Director
April 3, 1996
1�
���
IDEHNFR
RFCEIVED
APR 4 1996
WASTEWATER SMOIJ
MEMORANDUM
TO: Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
FROM: Robert G. Benton, Head
Shellfish Sanitation Branch
SUBJECT: Harker's Point Wastewater System
OSWS Project No. 95-17
We have reviewed plans for the subject wastewater system. The
distance from the disposal site to surface waters makes it very
unlikely that contamination of the adjacent waters will occur.
This assumption is made believing that the soils and water table at
the disposal site are suitable.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans.
RGB/ph
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SECTION - SHELLFISH SANITATION BRANCH
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Voice 919-726-6827 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
E) FEE
February 29, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. Charles Gardner, Director MAR u 4 19016
Division of Land Resources D!VISir=N L`
COASTAi_ MANAGENIEN T
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. I
Major Permits Processing Coordinator 1`L
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Harkens Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) �N4�
Project Location: adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the comm
Carteret County L
Proposed Project: to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
March 21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
✓ This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached. sf
Thi�ncobjec t�oject for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED �u a/y�, Ql%f� DATE ,3_ 7- Cf (,
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier Ml 1-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%past-conwmer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 7, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early
Environmental Review Coordinator
Division of Archives and History
/,;"A�
EDEHNF1
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
REIC VEO
JUL 5O
U 5o L996
MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)- c/o Harris & Asso.
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkers Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by March 28, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed 9,o&„/ — ��,.QCyy Date
U
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
July 2, 1996
IPiI:IPi[il:t109111u
TO: John R. Parker Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management , DEHNR
Colonel Robert J. Sperberg, District Engineer
Army Corps of Errgirteers, Wilmington P
istrlct
r/
FROM: David Brook ��
Deputy State isKi fork es
en Of icer
SUBJECT: Harkers Point, 28-lot subdivision, Harkers Island,
Carteret County, ER 96-8495
We have reviewed the permit application for the above project.
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
In 1995, archaeological investigations were conducted in the project area by
Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc. (ARC) to identify and evaluate any
archaeological and historical resources which may be affected by the proposed
development. Prior to the recent investigations, two sites had been recorded on
the property--31CR61, containing both prehistoric and historic period components,
and the Harker Cemetery.
According to the report prepared by ARC, the survey verified the location of site
31 CR61 along the northern shoreline of the project. The site contains both historic
and prehistoric remains, although the investigations indicate that the prehistoric
components may have relatively little research significance. The historic
component, on the other hand, may represent the home place of either Ebenezer
Harker (the eighteenth century namesake of Harkers Island) or one of his sons, and
appears to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The
site appears to be contained within lots 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the subdivision. The
historic Harker Cemetery has been delineated and defined for protection under the
proposed development plans.
We recommend that any permit issued for this project contain the following
condition:
Prior to any ground disturbing activities in lots 6, 7, 8, or 9 of the proposed
project, archaeological testing and data recovery shall be conducted at site
31 CR61. The investigations shall be at a level sufficient to mitigate the
adverse impacts of the development on the historic site and shall be
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 $��

Parker/SperbergI
July 2, 1996, Page 2
conducted in accordance with the procedures and guidelines of the North
Carolina Division of Archives and History.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: Richard Kimmel

11 APR 01 ' 96 10: 54R1°1
•" State of North Carolina
�. Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resourck E, E;
ell Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
R N Sc
rat"V aver hecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
ti41 "
[D FEE
March 7, 1996
L7
TO: Ms. Linda Sewall
Director
Division of Environmental Health
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
PE,CC�
M4R
or
SUBJECT: LAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: �arkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)--c/o Harris & Asso,
•
PROJECT LOCATION: 41ldj. SR1335, in Harkers Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by March 28, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293, When appropriate, in-depth conurients with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
0 •
i
m
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended /
changes are incorporated. See attached. a,;,e
AocZu-Q C7-etc? !I/ �� �t �? Lx�� V66,1
This agency o jects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
/7 ". LBGy2 �C2 Y e
Signed iii - Dated ;o�'r
PC. Sw 27687, Raleigh, Noilh Carohn,7 2'6' I-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An EGuoi Oppcf+u , Affrmot.ve Ac•60%recycled/ 10%PocJc:' xMer pope:

4 01 '96 10:-4WI
P.2
I .
0
t MEMORANDUM
'BAR
.. ; 9E
a Sewall
FROM: Pattdi Fowler p1V. OFEtJU1RLNrrt hFgr,F
DATE: March 2", 1996
SUBJECT: CAMA Application ,Review - Harkers Point (HTB
Associates, L.L.C.) - Carter oun y
46
Cumulative impacts from this type of project could cause
deterioration in water quaiity. The prcposed project would
increase impervious surfaces, alter the natural drainage patterns,
and there would be loss of natural vegetation, causing an increase
in stormwater runoff.
Any poss.i.t�weasures to decrease the runoff -from streets and
`o- a
impervious surfaces from the proposed project wou'_d he.p the
negative impacts of stormwater runoff.
i
[-A

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 7, 1996
MEMORANDUM
C) FEE HNF1
TO: Mr. Charles R. Fullwood, Jr., Director 1 ��
Wildlife Resources Commission ti`ti
Attn: Habitat Conservation Program .IfG�4%,
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator P
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Revie R r
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)--c/o Harris & Asso.
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkers Islandr, Carteret Co.
ROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed and return this form
by March 28, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed ' � Date 3 - Z � _q is
May 21, 1993
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

-State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 7, 1996
MEMORANDUM
IDFEE HNR
M3
TO: Mr. John Sutherland, Chief 14*" OF WATER RESWRCM
Water Planning Section
Division of Water Resources �2 1
FROM: John Parker, Jr. R�CF���gg6
Major Permits Processing Coordinator 9
0.Zk V* E4,V%,,
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Revie Vtl
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)-c/o Harris &
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkers Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
o�L this form by March 24, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact o Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed ! Date f4�24(
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 7, 1996
lul a ri:_►111MA
1:3FEE HNF1
TO: Mr. Joe Henderson, Acting Director
State Property Office
Department of Administration
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application
R %, �0
N1ARo p;_tLWA
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)-c/o Harris & Asso.
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkers Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
;fate
CL
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by March 28, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
s ✓ This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed_ Date 4 I I G_
P.O. Box 27687, Rdeigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 7. 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Larry R. Goode, Phd., P.E.
Highway Administrator
Division of Highways
FROM: John Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
1" 1g 1996
OR ASNNX-
cop,ia
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
APPLICANT: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)-c/o Harris & Asso.
PROJECT LOCATION: Adj. SR1335, Harkers Island, Carteret Co.
PROPOSED PROJECT: To develop a 28 lot subdivision.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by March 28, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact John Parker at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
l This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the
attac d c ents.
Signed Date 1 t 2747
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
1g96
MARCoas�
*PA
MEMORANDUM: 1 J
T D
TO: Mr. William A. McNeil, Director Jhjl� MAR 041996
Division of Community Assistance
DIVISION OF
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
Project Location: adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the community of Harkers Island,
Carteret County
Proposed Project: to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
March 21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: is -agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
+0 This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE 3 .1
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

- -
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda C. Sewall, Director
October 11, 1996
Mr. Roger Melville
Environmental Health Supervisor
Carteret County Environmental Health
Courthouse Square
Administration Building
Beaufort, NC 28516
1� ter"
1DEHNR
OCT 17 1996
Subject: Approval of revised plans and specifications for Harker's' -<as1
system, SR 1335, Harker's Island, Carteret County, NC, Project No. 95-17
Dear Mr. Melville:
We have reviewed revised plans, specifications and supporting documents for the above -
referenced project, received October 4, 9 and 10, 1996. It appears that all of our previous
technical comments have been adequately addressed by the proposed revisions.
Enclosed is one copy of the plans and specifications stamped "Approved by the On -Site
Wastewater Section, Division of Environmental Health, Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources." It is our understanding that an improvement permit has already been issued
by the local health department following our site approval letter of May 13, 1996. The
authorization to construct permit to be issued for this project must include the approved plans and
specifications, legal documents, and any conditions deemed appropriate by the health department.
The approved plans and specifications are for the following facilities and system components:
Facilities: 28, new, four -bedroom, single-family residences
System: New: 28, three-foot diameter, sealed, watertight, fiberglass, grinder pump basins (317
gallon capacity, minimum); 28, simplex grinder pump systems; 28, 1 1/4-inch service lines,
service boxes and service connections to 2-, 2 1/2- and 3 1/2-inch pressure sewer lines; 4-inch
forcemain feeding new tertiary treatment plant consisting of a 15,600-gallon surge tank/flow
equalization basin with dual pumps and aeration system with one blower; three-way flow
splitter/equalization box; three 20,000 gallon per day secondary treatment units, each consisting of
a 3000-gallon sludge holding tank, 20,000-gallon aeration basin with two blowers, total, and a
3700-gallon dual -hopper clarifier; and one 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment system
consisting of a denitrification/solids removal filtration system including a methanol feed system
(the details of which are to be separately reviewed and approved by our office), three 14 square
foot deep -bed, gravity flow, submerged filter cells, 4600-gallon clearwell with dual backwash
On-Slte Wastewater Section tea* FAX [phone]
P.O. Box 29594, Raleigh, NC 27626-0594 N o C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2895 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 2
October 11, 1996
pumps, air scour/nitrogen release system, 4000-gallon mudwell with dual backwash return pumps,
dual chlorinators and 1350-gallon chlorine contact chamber, stilling well and instantaneous and
continuous effluent flow monitoring device and 2500-gallon final effluent dosing tank with
quadruplex pump system; four low pressure pipe (LPP) drainfields (11,400 linear feet, total); and
three groundwater monitoring wells. Note that this system is to be installed in phases; the first
phase, covered under this approval, includes the pressure sewer system, complete flow
equalization system, flow splitter box, two secondary treatment units, the tertiary treatment unit,
two effluent dosing pumps, two LPP drainfields and three groundwater monitoring wells. Grinder
pump systems, including service line up to the service box shall be installed as lots are sold and
developed.
Design Flow: 13,440 gallons per day.
As you are aware, there are a number of times during the installation of this system when direct
supervision by the health department must be provided to insure that this system is installed
properly. Additionally, our office must be contacted for a final inspection before an operation
permit may be issued for the central collection, treatment and disposal system. For this project,
make certain that:
1. Individual lift stations are provided in strict accordance with approved plans and
specifications, including basin sizes, anti -floatation measures and basin locations,
ensuring that required setback distances have been maintained, specified grinder pumps,
controls, pump removal system, control panel in NEMA 4X enclosure, no electrical
connections made inside of the basin, fully watertight pipe connections and readily
accessible, watertight wet well lids. Ensure that each new grinder pump station is
watertightness tested after it is installed and its pipe connections are made, in accordance
with the procedure indicated in the specifications.
2. Pressure sewer mains and service laterals are properly constructed in strict accordance
with approved plans and specifications, including specified pipe materials, sizes and
installation procedures, provisions for crossing waterlines and encroaching upon
minimum required setback distances, minimum depth of cover, valves, cleanouts, and
thrust blocking, all as indicated. Ensure that all sewer appurtenances are adequately
protected, as indicated in the approved plans, by the use of valve vaults, boxes, or similar
protective enclosures. The entire pressure sewer system as well as individual pressure
sewer service lines must be demonstrated to be fully watertight by specified hydrostatic
leakage tests.
3. Tertiary treatment plant is provided in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications including basin dimensions, interior system components and design,
corrosion protection provisions, basin leakage test, specified pump and blower models,
control panels, and flow splitting weirs, true to the angles indicated, properly set,
calibrated and confirmed. Ensure that flow equalization system is set to operate

\L
Mr. Roger Melville
Page 3
October 11, 1996
effectively, including initial settings of flow splitting device, aeration systems are
properly provided in the flow equalization, sludge holding and aeration basins and are
inspected during operation for adequate air transfer and mixing, aeration systems are
interconnected with one another, as appropriate, sludge holding supernatant return
systems work properly, clarifier sludge and scum air lift return pumps operate properly,
clarifier overflow weirs are set level, denitrification filter is installed as shown and
specified and backwash/nitrogen release cycles are fully operable manually and
automatically. Also check all pumps and control systems for proper automatic operation.
4. Low pressure nine drainfields are installed in strict accordance with the approved plans
and specifications including previously -approved site preparation and fill procedures,
specified trench bottom elevations and system details including, pressure adjustment
valves at each subfield, cleanouts on both ends of each manifold, true -union ball valves at
the beginning of each line, laterals sleeved in conventional corrugated tubing with most
holes pointing upwards, protected tumups at the ends of all lines, specified washed gravel
size and depths, use of geotextile fabric at the trench backfill interface and lateral size,
material and hole size and spacing as indicated. Note the startup and testing provisions in
the specifications which must be adhered to including initial lateral blowout, pressure
head adjustment and delivery rate measurement. Ensure that fields are covered, seeded
and landscaped as necessary to facilitate the establishment of a suitable vegetative cover.
Also ensure that a regional representative of the Division of Water Quality, Groundwater
Section has inspected and approved the placement of the required groundwater
monitoring wells prior to the issuance of an operation permit.
5. Approved legal documents are properly executed.
It is critical that the Health Department require there to be a preconstruction meeting to be held
prior to system installation and attended by representatives of the Health Department, owner,
installer, installation certifying engineer, and this office if deemed appropriate. During this
meeting, the sequencing of project construction, inspection, and testing activities must be
discussed and clearly understood by all parties. Holding such a preconstruction meeting must be
listed as a condition in the improvement permit, with attendance required by all key parties
prior to the onset of the system installation.
Note that a main operation permit should be issued for the "upfront" system components (service
connections, pressure sewer, treatment plant and drainfields) and that separate improvement
permits should be issued for each proposed individual grinder pump station prior to construction of
any individual dwelling unit or building. All new pressure sewer mains and service connections
up to and including each individual service box and the central treatment and disposal system for
this project must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, certified by
a registered professional engineer, and approved by the health department prior to the issuance of
individual improvement permits. Prior to amending the main operation permit to include the
addition of new dwelling units, the lift station, gravity sewer, pressure sewer, and connection to the
service box for that dwelling unit must be certified to be installed and tested in accordance with the

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 4
October 11, 1996
approved plans and specifications by a registered professional engineer, and approved by the
health department.
Note that a registered professional engineer must certify that the central system has been installed
in accordance with approved plans and specifications based upon periodic observations of
construction and a final inspection for design compliance by the certifying engineer or his
representative, and the installation must be approved by the health department prior to the issuance
of an operation permit. The operation permit must include, as conditions, the operation and
maintenance procedures included in the approved plans and specifications as well as the
groundwater monitoring provisions recommended by the Groundwater Section of the
Division of Water Quality (refer to our May 13,1996 site approval letter and/or the attached
letter from the Groundwater Section). It shall also include the necessary information regarding
the proposed management entity and certified operator, and any additional concerns deemed
appropriate by the health department for the operation and maintenance of this system.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions pertaining to this letter or when we may
be of assistance during the final inspection of the installation of this system. We may be
reached at the address and phone and facsimile numbers listed on this letter or I may be
contacted directly by phone at [phone] or using electronic mail via the internet at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
0,vv�
Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
cc: Ron Cullipher
John Williams
Brian Wootton
Doug Huggett ✓

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
September 18, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199501535 and State Permit No. 121-96
Mr. Robert L. Moore
2105 West Nash Street
Wilson, North Carolina 27858
Dear Mr. Moore:
Reference your application for a Department of the Army permit to place
fill material in approximately 0.5 acre of vegetated wetland and nonvegetated
shallow water bottom in the Straits, for the development of the Harkers Point
subdivision, off S.R. 1335, in Harkers Island, Carteret County, North
Carolina.
Your proposal has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the
provisions and objectives of general permit No. 198000291. Therefore, you may
commence construction activity in strict accordance with applicable State
authorization and the enclosed plan. Failure to comply with the State
authorization or conditions of the general permit could result in civil and/or
administrative penalties.
If any change in your work is required because of unforeseen or altered
conditions or for any other reason, plans revised to show the change must be
sent promptly to this office and the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management prior to performing any such change or alteration. Such action is
necessary as revised plans must be reviewed and the authorization modified.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeff Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Chief, Source Data Unit
NOAA/National Ocean Service
Attn: Sharon Tear N/CS261
1315 East-West Hwy., Rm 7316
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3282
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Protection Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
100 Alabama Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North
Fisheries Service
Carolina 28516
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
3441 Arendell Street
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
General Permit No. 198000291
Name of Permittee: General Public
Effective Date: August 5. 1996
Expiration Date: August 4. 2001
DEPARTMENT OF TEE ARMY
GENERAL PERMIT
A general permit to do work in or affecting navigable waters of the United
States and waters of the United States, upon recommendation of the Chief of
Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3,
1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344),
is hereby issued by authority of the Secretary of the Army by
District Engineer
U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington
Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
TO AUTHORIZE THOSE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT RECEIVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE FORM OF THE FOLLOWING AUTHORIZATIONS:
A. COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT (CAMA) PERMIT.
B. PERMIT TO DREDGE AND/OR FILL.
C. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (SECTION 401, CLEAN WATER ACT).
a. Applications for State and Federal authorizations will be
accepted directly and simultaneously by both the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (NCDCM) and the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
(Corps). Receipt of a complete application by the NCDCM will initiate field
review to include a site visit and preparation of an Environmental
Consultant's Field Report. Receipt of an application by the Corps will
initiate Federal review. Immediately upon receipt by the Corps, an _
application will be assigned an action identification number, acknowledged,
and the appropriate Corps' Project Manager will examine the application to
assure that it can be processed pursuant to this general permit. The
applicant and the NCDCM will be furnished written notification of the Project
Manager's determination. Notification to the applicant will include a brief
description of the administrative process. For those proposals that may
result in a discharge into waters of the United States, including wetlands,
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWC) and the applicant will be

1�
y
-2-
informed regarding the applicant's need to obtain a Water Quality
Certification in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
b. The NCDCM Environmental Consultant's Field Report will be
furnished by the respective NCDCM Regional Offices to the Corps. The Corps
will provide copies of this Field Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Receipt of the Report will initiate
the Federal Agencies' review. The agencies will be provided sufficient time
by the corps, normally thirty (30) days, before their comments or
recommendations, including any recommended modifications or conditions
necessary to make the proposal acceptable, must be received by the Corps.
Should the agencies not comment within the review period, it will be assumed
they offer no objections. Extensions of time will be granted for agency
review only if justified by unusual circumstances. If an extension is granted
that would delay a NCDCM decision by the date on which an NCDCM decision must
be made, the application may be removed from this general permit.
C. The permit review process conducted by the NCDCM is a public
process involving public notices in local newspapers, public hearings and
various public appeal procedures. To further inform the public, the Corps
will distribute, at intervals of approximately two (2) weeks, an additional
public notice listing those permit applications received and being considered
by NCDCM and the Corps under this general permit since the preceding notice.
The notice will invite, for not less than fifteen (15) days, public comments
and/or requests for additional information and for public hearings. All
comments will be considered in the overall State/Corps decision on a permit.
d. This general permit does not, in any way, alter established
procedures or responsibilities, as required by Federal laws, memorandum of
agreements (MOA's) or administrative regulations with respect to the Corps'
coordination with the review agencies. The applicant will continue to have
the opportunity to rebut any objections to a proposal.
e. After Federal review agency comments are received, they will
be reviewed by the Corps and a coordinated Federal position will be prepared
and furnished to the NCDCM, in Raleigh, within forty-five (45) days after
receipt of the State'Environmental Field Consultant's Report. The coordinated
Federal position will include all conditions (including recommendations for
denial) recommended by the Federal agencies unless a changed or omitted
condition has the prior written agreement of the affected agency.
f. In those cases where the Corps does not concur with
conditions or recommendations of one or more of the Federal review agencies,
no coordinated Federal position will be furnished to the NCDCM until and
unless Federal agency agreement has been reached including, if necessary,
entering the referral procedures outlined by current memorandum of
agreements (MOA's) between the Army and respective agencies. The Federal
review agencies will be provided a copy of the coordinated Federal position
at the time they are furnished to the NCDCM.

,4,
-3-
g. If the conditions (including recommendations for denial)
from the review agencies are unacceptable to the NCDCM, the NCDCM will
contact the Corps within ten (10) days of receipt of the Federal position to
resolve the conflict. If resolution of the conflict involves changes to the
conditions or recommendations provided by the Federal review agencies, the
provisions of paragraphs e. and f. (above) will apply, including the
procedures of the MOA's, if appropriate. If the conflict is resolved to the
satisfaction of the Crops and affect review agencies, the NCDCM permit will
be issued and the authority of the general permit will apply.
h. If the conflict is not resolved within the time necessary
for a decision by the NCDCM, the NCDCM may proceed, independently, to
conclude the State action without inclusion of the Federal position. In
such case, the applicant and the NCDCM will be notified immediately, in
writing, that the State permit does not satisfy the'Federal permit
requirements and that the proposal in question may not proceed without
Federal authorization.
i. If the coordinated Federal position is not in conflict with
State agencies' positions, law, regulation or policy and is otherwise
acceptable to the NCDCM, a State permit will be developed by the NCDCM fully
incorporating the State and Federal positions. Copies of the permit will be
furnished to the applicant and the Corps. When required, a copy of the
Section 401 Water Quality Certification will be furnished to the applicant
and the Corps. Issuance of both the NCDCM permit and the NCDCC 401 Water
Quality Certification, if required, must proceed validation of this general
permit by the District Engineer or his representative.
j. If the NCDCM permit or Section 401 Water Quality
Certification is denied, the applicant will be informed that Federal
authorization is denied without prejudice.
k. No work may proceed under this general permit until and
unless the District Engineer or his representative provides written
validation that the procedures and conditions of the general permit have
been satisfied.
1. Following issuance of a NCDCM permit, the project will be
monitored by NCDCM personnel and inspected for compliance with NCDCM
regulations and procedures. Monitoring and periodic evaluation will also be
conducted by Corps' personnel. If, any time, a violation of the NCDCM
permit is discovered which would also have been a violation of the Federal
position, enforcement action may be taken by both the NCDCM and the Corps in
accordance with their respective regulations and policies.
m. Any work performed in any area under the regulatory
jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers that does not comply with the terms
and conditions of this general permit must have prior approval under the
customary regulations administered by the Corps as found in 33 CPR 320-329.
n. All activities identified and authorized by this general

-4-
permit must be consistent with the terms and conditions of thi--
authorization. Any activity accomplished, but not specifically identified
and authorized herein, may constitute a violation of Federal statute and
result in legal proceedings as may be considered appropriate by the United
States Government.
a. All activities authorized by this general permit that
involve the discharge of dredged material in waters of the United States
will be consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent
limitations and standards of performance, prohibitions, pre-treatment
standards and management practices established pursuant to the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and applicable State and local law. If the proposed
activity involves the discharge of dredged material in waters of the United
States, before the commencement of any work, the applicant will satisfy the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWC) regarding the need for a
Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
b. There will be no unreasonable interference with navigation
or the right of the public to riparian access by the existence or use of
activities authorized by this general permit.
c. A permittee, upon receipt of written notice from the
Wilmington District Engineer of failure to comply with the terms or
conditions of this general permit, will, within sixty (60) days, without
expense to the U.S. Government, and in such manner as the Wilmington
District Engineer may direct, affect compliance with the terms and
conditions or return the work -site to a pre -work condition.
d. The permittee must make every reasonable effort to perform
the work authorized herein in a manner to minimize any adverse impact on
fish, wildlife and aquatic resources.
e. The permittee must perform the work authorized herein in a
manner to minimize any degradation of water quality. The activity will be
conducted to prevent a significant increase in turbidity outside the area of
construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the
turbidity in the waterbody is fifty (50) NTU's or less in all rivers not
designated as trout waters by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWC), twenty-five (25) NTU's or less in all saltwater classes and in all
lakes and reservoirs, and ten (10) NTU's or less in trout waters, are not
considered significant.
f. The permittee will permit the Wilmington District Engineer
or his representative to make periodic inspections any time deemed necessary
to assure that the activity is being performed or maintained in strict
accordance with the Special and General Conditions of this permit.
g. This general permit does not convey any rights, either in

-5-
real estate or material, or any exclusive privileges; and it does not
authorize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement
of Federal, State or local laws or regulations, nor does it obviate the
requirement to obtain State or local assent required by law for the activity
authorized herein. These may include, but are not necessarily limited to, a
Dredge and/or Fill Permit (N.C.G.S. 113-229), a Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA) Permit (N.C.G.S. 113A-118), an Easement to Fill (N.C.G.S. 146-12) and
a Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act.
h. Authorization provided by this general permit may be either
modified, suspended or revoked in whole or in part if the Wilmington
District Engineer, acting for the Secretary of the Army, determines that
such action would be in the best public interest. Unless subject to
modification, suspension or revocation, the term of this general permit
shall be five (5) years. Any modification, suspension or revocation of this
authorization will not be the basis for any claim for damages against the
U.S. Government.
i. This general permit does not authorize the interference with
any existing or proposed Federal project and the permittee will not be
entitled to compensation for damages or injury to the structures or work
authorized herein which may be caused by or result from existing or future
operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest.
j. This general permit will not be applicable to proposed
activity when the Wilmington District Engineer determines that the proposed
activity would significantly affect the quality of the human environment and
determines that an Environmental impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared.
k. This general permit will not be applicable to proposed
construction when the Wilmington District Engineer determines, after any
necessary investigations, that the proposed activity would adversely affect
areas that possess historic, cultural, scenic, conservation or recreational
values. Application of this exemption applies to:
(1) Rivers named in Section 3 of the Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act (15 U.S.C. 1273), those proposed for inclusion as provided by
Sections 4 and 5 of the Act and wild, scenic and recreational rivers
established by State and local entities.
(2) Historic, cultural or archeological sites listed in or
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places as
defined in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and its codified
regulations, the National Historic Preservation Amendment Acts of 1980 and
1992, the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 and the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act.
(3) Sites included in or determined eligible for listing
in the National Registry of Natural Landmarks.

-6-
(4) Endangered or threatened species or habitat of such
species as determined by the Secretaries of Interior or Commerce and
conserved in accordance with the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531).
1. Permittees are advised that development activities in or
near a floodway may be subject to the National Flood Insurance Program that
prohibits any development, including fill within a floodway that results in
any increase in base flood elevations. This general permit does not
authorize any activity prohibited by the National Flood Insurance Program.
m. At his sole discretion, any time during the processing
cycle, the Wilmington District Engineer may determine that this general
permit will not be applicable to a specific construction proposal. In such
case, the procedures for processing an individual permit in accordance with
33 CFR 325 will be available.
BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Terry R. Youngbluth
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
District Engineer

HARKERS ISLAND ROAD
ROAD SECTION
SCALE: I"=10'
2x10 TREATED FILTER
CAP CLOTH 5�8� 0 GALVANIZED
WITH THREADED ENDS,
/— WASHER AND NUTS
4x6 WALER
I— DEADMAN
6x6 @ 8' O.C. 2x10 T&G WITH @ 8 O.C.
W/8' EMBEDMENT 4' EMBEDMENT
BULKHEAD DETAIL
SCALE: I"=30'
--------------------------
:.`0Q o��SSIO,yl�S
13 ru
Q•�
•' Q
DETAIL SHEET
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HARKERS ERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone] APPROVED:
Q Q9MMTTI i2Nl-TATRRRTMn IDA RDC
PRO.TF.CT •: PW707
PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 VAT
CITY, N.C. 28557
459 0 /i n '=A'

;fie:
PROPOSED .DEDICATION OF LOO AC -3.38 HAWffS ISLMD
MDGE
OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY.
LOTS I & 2 RESERVES THE RIGHT •-2•72 "M
TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK- -3.37
WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO
THE BEACH AREA IN ACCORDANCE '-3a2 ._t 7a
WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WANE THE 15'
SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION -z.sa
OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN. -1.39 �
APPROX. AREA -/.00 ACRES k --I29
APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER �
ueE ALGxeExr
Jss p
8 -JPB D�
OSJ
!A5 P0D0
0.32
............
q......... .�§
N
40. W4TL NDS "
4 O e x69"JY585Y
Ecrw
-Nfi9>y MANNGLE
L?,
:HA=RS=D
ROAO
SrRMS VIEW IANE
88 !f-!5•RCP
100, 50, O 100, 200'
EF
SCALE: 1" — 100'
EB 2 0 19w
PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA
�..•.••••••••••••�••••'�'!�!� CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
1E-3[AIRMERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
`,,p111111U//�
V1•CA/to""o, 4 CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
RDC
�.` �•,�FSS/p•.ti�y'�; ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
•y. WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
�a¢ S L = DJV
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
' �o '•.F Q.,' Q; S STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. Roc
•N �''•'rHESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATj;
.. . , m ,��• �rp„�. C1i�•���,, rHcfA1 � E Dd,o'TY^NAC. 28557

k4
a
r&RVR �, r.T
i
CONsraumKW
`,�_
Wa•aa ��\
EVrRAACE
1_
IRIERsECIKW
•-
y
`LE'._
�•'71.
HARKERS ISLND ROAD &
4
�'�. ,g+p �OE'�
fib., �v'
NARKERS POW ROAD
A01
•
L. ,yn.
• d
O EKIsfIKO
'
ovirrROAD W?N
'EEO'ASEYEM'L+
'•!
�,'�
F�WI �
B/�
C
/ TRANGLE
-
lp
•„'VOA
�
xx
d
V r• a
•
f
.
P:
x� 61W
r
Wt. i�r
P
9R -
Oks CREW r
� ti
C'• .. r
R
',.�
Y
r
k
yam"
•"
r cry E
W
EXISTING PRECAST BULKHEAD
r
Z�?
yr
x,
r
4
A .• 8
x
!
TBN IN LIGHT POLE
E
f
ELEY.- 5.45 NSL
_
r
A
SEE ROAD SECTION
DI SHEET 6 OF 6
N+P
MOORE
f
/
I '
•
1 �
'
'
100' 60' 0 100, 200'
SCALE: 111 100'
FEFORCE MAIN PLAN
~...CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
]H[AIRK]ERS POINT
I
1
ISLAN
CAROLINA
`,% CA p</Nq'4� CLIENTERS CLY EOHARRjSERET COUNTY. NORTH DESIGNED
4,9 = ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET
a S3349 hr
a
'Pp4:.FNOI,
yaaa I t . I.
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN
UJV
PHONE: (919 ) 237-6701
HESTRON PLAZA
102

° -3.15 438 LF NEW WOODED BULKHEAD -''°0 °
FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED -2.92
BY CAMA OFFICALS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION -SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 -0.81 -0.93
°0•64 FOR DETAIL SECTION. v
MLW 063.. 0614&
0
p• .:a:. .
z 59. SPA.
MHW -
i ° ..'; 00.77 76° I
L
TIMBER -' WALL " ' 96 °-L7, a aa1
0-6.5e
• • TENSION OF G 6.96 ° -0.6
a �'9B°rOP: OF B -ERTY LNE—•a -0.47 :.;
w ONCE FILLED � z
.... • . -
.......:......1._._... o 0_927
9I 0.9Q
:i; °I
.01 -5.90 I ° -7.89 C
-8.37
— ° -724 ° I
Lj N 0.96 - ° -8.8a8210Z¢¢,,,1,
N �i : o 0-1.06Ip.
41�18
m 0.. : 0.9 • e67
C2 = :2r.r: ::_ 0.8
WETLA
'TO BE F y.
5 =%
MAXWELL
b/O 4b'49'M bZ.84y=y L-7L= 1 - -- 90.OL _ iL 'B -c
.1 .60 ,84 •bV 4.64.E M.1 •LB
.....................................
iT
• C •7 M.60,Z4.BF
-.'. SB7.3 ' 37
1' •.' P1I707 .48
a 3' 37' 58' S87' 35.13' E—.-�. •1 B
•4OF7
- -336
-3.0a o -2.73
o -239
EX/STING BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
-----------------------------------
404 WETLANDS L1NE--------------
° a 6a.............. °
8 2' 02• F �• 163.65_(TOTALI E 82.33' Fa• v _ 4'�
b3 N8MLW
220 ......... -�
TIYBER W/NGWALL
TOP OF ,:pAh1K
ca 80` 30' O BO'
ui
13 - ""_ � 12 ♦
4t
o SCALE= 1'0
OLD BOAT RAMP — =C SEAL z
y9&TO BE FILLED } i3343 z
i6 oe.'0�.,I�yGIT1
•6 ♦ 51
••••.•••• \
fy MARINA FILL PLAN ''�4�D.CV�
AE - ----- - CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HA����S POINT
w HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
� m
h m = mN m CLIENT: HTB ASSOCIATES .L.L.C. DESIGNED:
i = C/O CLYDE HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
ADDRESS: WSTREET ILSON. N.C. 27858
DRAWN:
• = PHONE: [phone]
3 8 APPROVED:
S3' S STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE-
MOREHEAD CITY,,, N.C. 28557 2/20/96
ROT Gn-�1rT�1r.T.Tauru p !� 1 "= 60'

THE IyWPAR/AN SETBACK IS WANED BETWEEN THE
FOUMING LOTS BUT DOCK FACILITIES SHALL NOT EXTENT
BEYOND THE UNE SHOWN: LOTS 3,4J2J3J4J5J/J8J9 & 20
NEWBULKHEAD .
PROPOSED FILL LINE
TRACT ACREAGE 27.96•AC
j i r "THE STRAITS" PUBLIC ACCESS 1.00 AC
TO BE i , I N BULKHEAD; Dr i CEMETARY 0.97 AC
I j TO BE REMOOVED i r r i i RIGHT OF WAY 3.40 AC
RESERVED BY 0.70 AC
r I i i i i r anComm' OWNER
COMMON AREA 5.40 AC
� LOT AREA 15.23 AC
I �t LJ g�""' - �.m.e NO. LOTS 28
e y Qo 'b AVE LOT SIZE .544 AC
N/F -
KBE
MAXWELL PAVEMENT AREA 1.26 AC
�,O
® ❑ 91
p POINT z
Nrx Ta
u T AWLE
...... -. _ Ex/57/AG OVERNEAD
POWER ••� - s'• O BE
R&OCATED TO INIERSELTNAV
® O • �� NEW RAV
® ASTLSLWD ROAD
5TA4T
VIEW LANE IIIIII/1tltNt
NytiEe. •...,� ® •-. SA ACRES o1�1
IVX 7015AWfr
_ TRrAWNE r �.
�. BROOKS CREEK ® \\\ � �rN�ERSEcrNAv •RCP •'0,." 4tr
HMMERS rSLAND ROAD & ., .
O O HARKERS PG'Mf ROAD
0.0000
® � /\ =TIVITICs
200' 100' 0 200, 400' /
SCALE 1" — 200' r •=
ma oa
'ROIECT •: PY707 snvs As rwovm
SHEET • 3 OF 7�
N/T CARTERET CODETT
PLAN!
HAR"RS POINT
...•u m.m. uitm•t eam. vnll�fd���111000
m asa Eu�rs
rim: mc. m'

EX.CHANNEL MARKER
N/F
MAXWELL
EX. CHANNEL MARKER
300 YR. FLOOD ELEV.- 7.0 MSL
COMMUNITY PANEL 3700 43 0729C
REVISED AUGUST 19, 1985
ru urt
EXISTING BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
fO1P0 - 7"
r wlxvrr
MAR . -- tea
BROOKS CREEK
ocu Las aua s
mvm a s,rcuc wvs
TTP R S7WrW LOCATIOW
•Tt
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
SCAT E 1" - 2-00'
PROJECT •: PM707
S$EET 9 2 OF 7
t
i
I
r CLEC
tIx>ar eoewcrtoN rrr►�
TRAL77 ACREAGE -2796 AC
NUMBER OF LOTS -28
"THE STRAITS"
N/T CARTZR COUNTY
.asr
•MST
CURVE
!F
DATA:
•1 CENrR& MGLE•
100000
cm m DIRECrew,
N 76 02 W,= *'
RADVSs
I257.1058
LEA67N-
ZS.403
TANBENr•
LQLXXO
CHORD.
29.9m
EXTFFNAL•
48027
Y21DIf OADINATf•
478"
•2CENTRAL ANGLE-
71 42 39976
am &RECrwv-
5 63 05 52I27 W
5
7WZ
TANGENT-
1950000
EEXrrALE&N-53
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
432M
•3 CENTRAL ANGLE-
J 38 50370
CFRWD DIRECTION-
N 69 52 OEM W
RAD_IS-
32977730
ti. •' IENGrN-
20932W
l�. TANGENT-
05DOOO
r C/A7RD-
EXTERNAL-
2OR8M
L6712
MIDLYE ORDINATE-
LE703
04 C£NrRAL ANcLE-
3 37 9060
' OMD aRECFAON-
N 69 y I5.40 W
RADUA
316Z749
LENGrH-
1999M4
TANGENT-
100m00
8 CHORD-
199"
M1 EXTERNAL-
0605
10'X 70' MIDDLE ORDINATE-
1.5797
u NAW E •5 OEWRAL ANGLE-
8 54 28D79
UKAD DIRECTION-
N 67 L2 41" W
RAM
IMA260
INT£RSECrKW {EI�GIN-
W-WO
ROAOT�
ARXERS BLAND
STRAfrs VIEW LANE EXTERNAL-
99J%0
J9897
A ONN MIDDLE ORDINATE-
JB770
•6 CENTRAL ANGLE-
2449 45235
CHM DIRECTION-
N 75 0 20.478 W
86 LF-is,ACP RAD115•
34C70N
LEAG7'*
WSLUAJ
TANGENT'
750=
EXTERNAL-
8/93
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
78665
;XHr •7 CENTRAL ANGLE-
0 37 5400.T
GLAND DIRECTON-
s 85 35 47LO7 W
RADVS-
II82931
LENGTH-
995278
- l9 RCP TANGENT-
500000
INTERSECTION CORD-
EXTERNAL-
992932
29777
VMERS ISLAND ROAD 8 MIDDLE ORD'NATE•
2A59
SRNFRS FUKT ROAD
R hiDN MYYIIf
® .�Of •. c. IYS7
IIfW. RC. SHINM

rm
e I�
jt o
NORTH RIVER N/F YAXT:
x
U
/�jir ]NjRI HGGS IB x
BROOKS CREEK 1+
19 u
N/F MOORE m n
FUTURE DEVELOPMEN - u
0s u
s.o0os0m a 10
09po9 au
flRlrATp
rermr
rmlrr x R e
x
J
9
t
x a
I
- E
W NIF
OTF REFUGE v�
J� HARKERS
POINOP09EDI •�aaulnnp�
500' 250' 0 500, 1000, y `•.•`�N CARP
KgF
HA
SCALE 1" - 500, _ Qa SEAL
PROJECT •: PM707 = 133a3
SHEET • 1 OF 7
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
SHEET 1............ COVER SHEET
SHEET 2............ HARKER'S POINT SITE PLAN
SHEET 3............ HARKERS POINT CAMA ACTIVITIES
SHEET 4............ MARINA FILL PLAN
SHEET 5............ FORCE MAIN PLAN
SHEET 6............ PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS PLAN
SHEET 7............ DETAIL SHEET
NOTE:
1.1 THIS SHBET PROVIDED TO FAMILAR REVIEW PERSONEL
WITH LOCATION OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH ADJOINING
CHARACTERISTICS. THIS INFORMATION WAS SCANNED FROM
AERIAL TAX PARCRL MAP AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL SURVEY
OF ADJOINING PARCELS.
HARKEB3
POINT
CEMETARY
STRAITS
COVER SHEET
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HARMK]EI3 S POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT= CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED
S 9TROUD ENGINEERING,P.A. RDC
LAZA ONE SUITE 102 I DATE:
CITY, N.C. 28557 ., / -(_,
SCALE:
1"= 500'

DIVISION OF COASTAL, MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the
community of Harkers Island, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: 155-1, P-7 1984: 38-1215, V-17
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2725900 Y: 359500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-8-96
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 2-20-96
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Limited Transitional and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, CW & ES
(C) Water Dependent: Yes and No
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing -
Planned - 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment system
(F) Type of Structures: Existing -
Planned - Future residential development w/associated piers
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0' to moderate
Source - personnel observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
,DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
± 880 ft.2
Spartina alterniflora
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
± 21000 ft.2
ex.boat basin bottom
(C) Other
± 5 ac.
High ground
(land disturbed)
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ± 5.5 ac.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to develop a 28 lot subdivision at a site adjacent to
SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Harkers Point
PAGE N2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The applicants property is a ± 60 acre tract of land
located on the northwestern end of Harkers Island and on the west side of SR 1335
immediately south of the Harkers Island Bridge. The subject of this permit application
is a ± 28 acre portion of this tract which is proposed to be developed into a
subdivision and a 1.5 acre site which is to be used for sewage disposal. The
subdivision tract is bordered on the north by the Straits and on the south by Brooks
Creek, which is also the entrance channel going into the County's Harbor of Refugee
and abuts the Harbor on the southeast side. The majority of the high ground property
consists of woodlands with pine and oak as the dominate species. A dirt drive bisects
the property and provides access to the adjoining property owner located to the west of
the project site. A varying border of coastal and 404 wetlands exists along the
shoreline. On the northeast side (fronting the Straits) a ± 5 to 50' wide sandy beach
area exists along a portion of the shoreline. The remaining shoreline shows signs of
slight to moderate erosion with an erosion scarp having developed. The beach area has
been used for many years as a popular swim beach for the locals in Harkers Island and
the surrounding communities. A ± 150' wide x ± 140' long to -9' mean low water
(MLW) basin was excavated into the interior of the property along its northwest
property line around the late 1960's to early 70's. The previous land owner requested
a Dredge and Fill permit to connect the basin into the waters of the Straits. A permit
was issued but it is unclear whether it authorized the entrance channel. According to
historic photography, there was, however, a water connection established from the
basin to the Straits. Today, the bulkhead around the basin has washed away or is
deteriorated to the point of being non-functional. The mouth of the basin has shoaled
in to the point where there is only a small trickle of water flowing out of the basin into
the Straits during low tide conditions. A 6' to 20' border of coastal wetlands vegetated
primarily with spartina alternflora has volunteered along the southern shoreline of the
basin and a ± 10' wide border of spartina alterniflora exist along the Straits just west
of the basin entrance. Scattered clumps of oysters are also located at the mouth of the
basin. Numerous amounts of building and other debris have been deposited along the
shoreline of the basin throughout the years.
The site has been identified in the past as an area with archaeological potential as well
as having an old cemetery existing on the property. The Hankers Point Cemetery has
not been maintained in recent years and contains the grave sites of many early residents
of Hankers Island. In 1995, the applicant hired an archeological research firm and a
"Phase II study" was performed to identify any additional unmarked graves outside of
the cemetery proper and to examine the site for any prehistoric or historical
archaeological sites with significant remains that might be eligible for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places. The results of the survey have been
summarized in a report to the applicant and a copy has been provided to the Division
of Coastal Management and the Division of Archives and History. Anyone wishing to
review the document should contact the Division of Coastal Management's Morehead
City office.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
HARKF.RS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 28 acres into
a 28 lot subdivision with the typical lot size being ± 'h acre in size. Access to the
lots will be provided by two paved private roads which will have direct access to the
Harkers Island Road (SR 1335). A 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment plant with
associated subsurface disposal fields is proposed on a ± 1.5 acre site ± 2,000' south
of the subdivision site. This wastewater facility will not only service this development
but will be available for, the future development of the remainder of the property. The
wastewater will be transported to the disposal site by the use of individual pump tanks
with a force main being installed within the right of way of SR 1335. The 4" PVC
force main will buried ± 3' below the existing grade of the roadbed and within the
Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) along an area adjacent to
the County's Harbor of Refuge. Early into the development of this project, the
applicant consulted with state and federal review agencies concerning the possibilities
of re-establishing the marina basin and 'providing an access channel into the Straits.
Because of the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the access channel
alignment, the applicant abandoned that concept and is now requesting a permit to fill
in the basin to the elevation of adjoining uplands. The shoreline of the Straits
immediately adjacent to the fill area would be bulkhead at the mean high water line and
landward of coastal wetlands. The deteriorated breakwater/bulkhead along the Straits
shoreline would also be removed. The basin filling would result in the loss of ± 880
ft.z of spartina alterniflora marsh and ± 2,100 ft.z of shallow to deep bottom areas
within the basin itself. The development of the subdivision will require the grading of
± 3.4 acres in association with the streets and it's right of way. The construction of
homesites will be left up to the individual purchaser with the low density stormwater
requirements (under Environmental Management Commission rules) limiting the built
upon area for each lot to 30%. Grassed swales are to be located between lots 14 and
15 and lots 4 and 5. These swales will provide drainage relief from the proposed road
system with the terminal ends being located near the shoreline of the Straits. In
addition to the 28 lots, the applicant is proposing to dedicate ± 5.4 acres as a
"Common Area", ± .97 acres as a cemetery site and a ± .9 acre site for beach
access. The proposed beach access site would be dedicated to Carteret County if they
are willing to accept and maintain the area. A portion of the beach access site appears
to be part of the causeway which was created in the construction of the Harkers Island
Bridge. For the most part this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of
the presence of riprap and coastal wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access site
is a sandy beach area. It can also be anticipated that many of the future lot owners
will want to construct piers into the Straits and within the Brooks Creek and the access
channel leading into the County's Harbor of Refugee. The applicant has positioned the
pier alignment on lot 3 to the western property line so that the majority of the beach
area on that lot and to the east will be free from obstacles.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #4
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the development of
a 28 acre tract of land into a 28 lot subdivision with associated Common Area.
Wetland impacts will be limited to ± 880 ft.2 of primarily spartina alterniflora which
exist within the human made boat basin and ± 21,000 ft.z of estuarine bottom area.
The filling would also require approx 1,500 yds' of upland fill being placed below the
mean high water line of the basin. While there will be a loss of estuarine bottom,
potential negative water quality impacts from the existing basin would be eliminated.
The scattered amount of oysters at the entrance channel could be easily relocated
outside the fill area and into the open waters of the Straits. Approximately 3.4 acres
will be disturbed in associated with the installation of the road system for the
development. Sewage will be pumped off site to a ± 1.5 acre tract of land located
south of the project site. The applicant has indicated that the approval for this
wastewater treatment plant has not received approval from the Division of Health
Services. Potable water will be supplied by individual wells. The applicant has
designed the development to comply with the low density stormwater rules with no
more than 30% of the individual lots being built upon. Two drainage swales are
proposed and will provide drainage from the road towards the Straits. As a result of
the archaeological findings, a Phase III evaluation is scheduled for the summer of 1996
on lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The applicant has indicated that no development would occur
on these lots until after the study is completed. It can be anticipated that some of the
future lot owners will build piers extending into the navigable waters of the Straits and
Brooks Creek. The specific location of these piers will be left up to the individual
property owners except for lot 3 where the pier will be constructed adjacent to the
western property line. It is not anticipated that any closure of shellfishing waters
would occur within the Straits and the waters of Brooks Creek are already closed. As
a result of the interest shown by the locals, the applicant is setting aside ± .97 acres
for the Harker's Point Cemetery. They have acknowledged that while the proposed
road and development will be private, access to the cemetery by the public will not be
prohibited. An approx..9 acre beach access site is proposed to be given to Carteret
County. A portion of this area would appear to be within the causeway area created
when the Harkers Island Bridge was constructed. A significant portion of this
causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of previous riprap placement and
the existence of wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access area is primarily a
sand beach which is separated from the adjacent high ground by a 404 wetland area.
As mentioned before, this area has historically been used as a popular beach site for
many of the Down East communities and is intensively used during the summer. The
construction of future piers along the shoreline will prohibit the use of off -road
vehicles from using the beach and will impeded pedestrian access to some degree
beyond the dedicated beach access site.
PREPARED BY: Charles Jones
DATE: February 29, 1996

Form'DCM-MP-1
APPLICAT 0 FEB
' �.��_,•.�t'
019�35
(To be completed by all applicants) U
t�wiaw:aatabrayaaaciwntiaw�:
b. City, town, community or landmark
1: APPLICANT Harkers Island
c. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: NCSR 1335
Name R.L. Moore
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City
Wilson
State N.C.
Zip 27858 Day Phone _(919) 237-6701
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name_ HTB Associates. L.L.C.
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City
Wilson
State N.C.
Zip 27858. Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Harkers Point
NOTE: penrit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT.
a. County
Carteret
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? ; x yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Straits
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
28 lot subdivision (single family
Fill old marina.
Construct bulkhead. -
Sewer force main installation.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? . New.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private use.
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. To construct 28 lot single
family subdivision. Equipment will
include conventional earth moving
equipment, bulldozer, backhoe, dump
trucks. etc.
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-1
4.. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
•Offsite sewage disposal system presently
being reviewed by On —Site Sewage Branch.
a.
Size of entire tract 27.96 acres
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
b.
Size of individual lot(s) 20, 000 sf and larger.
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
c.
Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
through swales in a low—densitv'devetop—
NWL 5 MHW
ment.
d.
Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Sandy.
Individual wells proposed. No community
source available.
e.
Vegetation on tract Wooded/oak and pine
are predominate species.
f.
'Man -made -features now on tract old marina.
•
5. ADDTTIONAL INFORMATION
g.
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Can:att the togal to„.._; plan.)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
�'A_ Conservation X Tranuni CClr9i 7ep1
•
/
Developed .Commmunityy
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
Rural Other
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
h.
How is the tract zoned by local government?
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
Unzoned.
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
i.
Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
from the owner to carry out the project.
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cert(ficote, if applicable) , .
• An aecurate,_dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j.
Has a professional, archaeological assessment been
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
done for the tract? X Yes No
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
If yes, by whom? Archaeological Research
detailed description.)
Consultants,•Inc.:(Thomas Hargrove)
k.
Is the project located in a National Registered
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
Historic District or does it involve a National
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
Register listed or eligible property?
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
Yes X No
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
1.
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
Coastal (marsh) X Other X_
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
(Anach docw&ntation, if available)
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Reviwd 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERNIISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Name Carteret County I certify that I am authorized Wgrant, and do in fact,
Address Courthouse So. , Beaufort NC 28516 grant permission to representatives of state and federal
Phone [phone] review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
Name J. L. Maxwell, Jr. permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
Address 711 Lakeshore Dr., Goldsboro NC 27534projeCt.
Phone _(919) 778-5561
Name Holly Hamilton Briggs I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Address 909 Evans St., Morehead City NC 28557
Phone [phone]
• SEE RTTV9CWrf)t5u-r FOR. NCDo1- This is the 12th day of Feb. 19 96 .
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
None.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
Print Name /ftvo Harnris
Signature Hav� r
Landowner oZ1 tized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
X DCM MP-3
Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4
Structures Information
DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
I�7
FEB 2 0 1996
Revknd mwt
i3�etmsaaoli6a waaaoatiaa�aA

Form• DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilizaian)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
MR
s? :• gsm
�%sum
>+
1. ]�XCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL.
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no; attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? —Yes —No
If yes, where?.
FEB 2 0 1996
Revised 03195 ytiWNaaaa�aaaaaaaa►IDtlabi7

Form DCM=MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes -- No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
X Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
/.
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Unknown.
(Source of informsion)
L Type of bulkhead or riprap material
Wooden bulkhead. •"11
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material sand.
i. Source of fill material Unknown, to be
purchased from properly licensed
borrow pit.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
:.•. A.J.. �.... �..•
a. Will fill material be„b't`'oupht.to site?
X Yes " No' ;:
Revised 03/95 " _ "
If yes, .. ..
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water 150 x 150 x 6' AVG = 5.000 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 150
(3) Purpose of fill Fill old upland marina
basin.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 5 (alone
south side of basin).
(2) Purpose of fill Reclaim old inland
marina.
5. GENERAL.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Property constructed
bulkhead and seeding.
b. What type.of construction equipment will be used
(for example,, dragline, backhoe, 'or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe, trackhoe, dozer, dump trucks.
c. Will wetlands be crassed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Date

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Fg6 2 0 1295
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit, •Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete, all Permit may also;,require a Stormwater Certification.
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this Has a site development plan' been submitted to the
proposed project. ...--.- .. ... Division of Environmental Management for review?
a. Type and number'of'buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 28 sin le family lots,
i.
x Yes No
If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Offsite wastewater treatment plant.
b. Number of lots or parcels 28
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) 28 units- ( 1 unit/acre.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. 5 acre maximum.
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? x -Yes No
If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
Marl and asphalt.
g. Give the percentage of.the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, 'to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be usedfor
vehicular driveways or parking. 3.0%. MA)UNUrrl
FotL XNAIUiDU-t_ L81's p7e of ei_uL717ptyta
Revise
tJo LIG Is�lr l�li�l -?s A�
d 03195
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? In review by
(Attach appropriate documenrarion)On-Site Sewage Branch.
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Surface runoff.
Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Individual wells.
in. Will water be impounded? _ Yes x No .
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
Clyde Harris
App6 at Proj ct N ne
Signaturel�j/ /
Date

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. JOB
Hestron Plaza One SHEET NO.
Suite 102
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557 CALCULATED BY
[phone] CHECKED BY
GPAPmfZOFHNN4$ )w (�)®.LL C .W 01111. T. 04,Mfg mam Id00.954980

Narrative
Harker's Point Major CAMA Permit
tEB 2 0 1996
p.�yY\YIN\4 /� GL Y Y Y4i\Y9 NY\�
HTB Associates, L.L.C. proposes to develop a 27.96 acre parcel of land on the northwestern
end of Harkers Island. The proposed Harker's Point single family subdivision will consist of 28 lots.
All lots will be either waterfront or water view and will allow for a large common area protecting the
integrity of the property leading to the Harkers Point Cemetery and the Maxwell property to the west.
The project has additional property to the south which has not had its development planned
with the exception of a 60,000 gpd tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields.
This system is currently being reviewed by the On -Site Sewage Branch.
During the planning process leading to the Major CAMA Permit submittal, several issues came
to light and were addressed as follows:
Harker's Point Cemetery
Harkers Point Cemetery has been an unmaintained cemetery containing the grave sites of
many early residents of Harker's Island. Following site evaluations by Mr. John Clauser of the N.C.
Department of Archives and History, many of the previously documented sites were located and the
proposed boundary of the cemetery was established.
Local citizens have indicated their desire to form the Harkers Point Preservation Committee to
manage and maintain the historical significance and heritage of this island cemetery. The developer
has encouraged and has appreciated the assistance provided by the island residents. While the
proposed new roadway construction is to be private, access to the cemetery is a right conceded to the
public. The developer will continue to work with the preservation group to restore the cemetery site.
Archaeological Findings
Following the disclosure of a study conducted by Thomas Loftfield in 1969 which found
artifacts along the north shoreline of this tract, Mr. Thomas Hargrove of Archaeological Research
Consultants,Inc. was retained to conduct an assessment of the tract His report is attached. Phase III
archaeological evaluations are scheduled for this summer on Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9.
Filling he Prevoousjy Constructed inland Marina
The original plan for this development included interior lots, which were required by local
ordinance to have adequate water access. The site has an inland basin marina which, through lack of
maintenance, has had its access channel silt -in and the bulkhead has deteriorated. Early discussions
with state and federal personnel indicated that with the presence of SAV in the channel alignment,
permitting would be difficult to re -dredge to the facility.
Since it is not likely that the inland basin would be permitted to be reconstructed, it is
desirable to fill the basin and associated wetlands that were created at the boat ramp and re-establish
the site to its original grade.
Public Use of the Beach
Prescriptive use of the beach at the north end of the tract has been a consideration of our
design. Lots 1 and 2 are to be water view without riparian rights to construct piers. Lot 3 will be
restricted to pier construction along the western property line.
The resulting property of 1.00 acres is to be donated to Carteret County and used for a public
beach access.

HARKERS ISLAND ROAD
ROAD SECTION
SCALE: 1"=10'
2x10 TREATED FILTER
CAP ____\ /--CLOTH
c�
a
rn
4x6 WALER
6x6 @ 8' O.C.-
W/8' EMBEDMENT
2x10 TB.G WITH
4' EMBEDMENT
BULKHEAD DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=30'
ppR0L/N��,,
�Q�.��SSIO�'9'•...
13'Qu
o ! fNGA?;� �Q
DETA
5118' 0 GALVANIZED
WITH THREADED ENDS,
WASHER AND NUTS
DEADMAN
@ 8' 0. C.
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HARKERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
DRAWN
WILSON, N.C. 27858
DJV
PHONE: ( 919 ) 237-6701
APPROVED:
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
M024HEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 , _ 2/20/96
PROJECT •: PM707
SHEET • 7 OF 7
-AS SHOWN

PROPOSED DEDICATION OF /.00 AC
OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY.
LOTS / & 2 RESERVES THE RIGHT
TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK-
WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO
THE BEACH AREA IN ACCORDANCE
WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WAIVE THE 151
SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION
OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN.
APPROX. AREA =LOO ACRES
I APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH
PIER AWNHENT
LINE
3.55
-J.45
-390
\h
024 032e
-J28
17.53
e-3.38
° 2.72
=3.37
e-3.22
-1.74
-2.54
=1.39
111.5.5
e •129 N2947JJ'E
0.10
0.0
HARKER'S ISLAND
BRIDGE
43M
!7b ..pED�s ...I�
m
............
'�404 WE,CLiWO� .
® qW • 6•• I N8SJ5':
JOS
5, .O
b I
tir
�'ANGLE
ROAD
LANE
rllal:&3:lai
100, 50' 0 100, 200,
SCALE: 1" — 100'
FEB 2 0 IVA
PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA
». ---------••+CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HAIRKEIMS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
"Illso11111/1
Qgl1•CAq�p��� CLIENT• CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
RDC
�z 'Z7,�•60F08/0006 ADDRESS! 2105 W. NASH STREET DRAWN
Q y WILSON, N.C. 27858
•¢ SEAL 9rL PHONE (919 [ 237-6701 DJV
13343 APPROVED:
• 901.. , Q;+��� g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
'•:�G...... Q HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE
1CU,�`` M1 I EAD4C TY, N C. 28557 2/20/96
PROJECT PM707 I b4 Z61-Yt- SCALE:
SHEET • 8 OF 7 0 ALD D. CULLIP R, P.E. 1 "= 100'

• gsT4 \` �� Aq
�•` `o E•` .y
;�$QY ReSERV tbe'•r'Ae~
FD 4 "mow
L.44 L
e• am•a•
B• eaaaaz'
IO'X TO'SK.NT
TRIANGLE
8 Ifi-0V-T' V
10b9•
64 LF -ISRCP
5O'STONE
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
ROAD a
ROAD
•i V
f
•
CW
• may.
^ P�.
/
$
N • O-
�
BR0 �`°"•
• �8
x.
0IC S cllo
r • � ti
K
ti
•
r'� c��y
EXISTING PRECAST BULKHEAD
x r
r
S
+^
TBM IN LIGHT POLE
=+
R
ELEV.. 5.43 VSL
N/P
MOORE
SEE ROAD SECTION
DETAILS SHEET 6 DF 6
100, 50, 0 100, 200'
SCALE: 1" - 100'
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
pl
e� Iill, (�I ICI (•J
C5 ROz�rj% CLIENT:ERS CLLYDEO HARRR SERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGNED
? 2�� OO49'; % ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET RDQ
�a SEAL _ WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJV
„N PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
0'';°Nc L+:`` g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
�' �a HESTRON PLAZA .ONE SUITE 102 DATE
,Olt"
r i
EHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96
PROJECT •: PM707-7 9 �}�SCALE:
SHEET • 5 OF 7 RONALD D. CULL HER, P.E. +� 1"= 100'

° -3.15 438 LF NEW WOODED BULKHEAD -3'e0 0
FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED 2.92
BY CAMA OFFICALS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION" SEE SHEET 6 OF 6
-0.81 -0.93
°0.64 FOR DETAIL SECTION.-----------------�-------------------
2.59 MLW -
MHW 11 . `s _ t 0.
TIMBER rWINGWALL
OP.OF B K
w Q�•�! i'rl Cjl 3.
N
• ® ✓ N
i .•�1
L J �
v ) '
t-
1.96 _00.77-..-O.BBI 1
0
-1.74
0-6.58 0 -7.81 2.05 1 ° -0.38
0-1.59
EXTENSION OF G 6.96 I °-80.
.98 ,
n PROPERTY UNE') -
"• s ONCE FILLED
mo 0_9.27 i
A
° -7.24
0.96
0 0-1.08
0.9
N/F
MAXWELL A
PROJECT 0:PM707
SHEET • 4 OF 7
3.36
0
° -3.08 -2.96
0 -2.73
0
-2.39
EXISTING BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
/- 404 WETLANDS
__.__.._._. ^S.
�4. _ o� ,aaauTnTm l t
TOP OF
o
I
-5.90
l Z
I
-8.370
I
) 0- .21 0.8
o -8.68
,e
N85•gq00'4ljygmp•
a. _FY'g
68
;
OL
A.
a.6
ETLA
r
BE F
'
bZ'84449
bZ'944=8 L'9L=l 0'0£=l' S0'OL fG •0.
.b0 ,84.bV 4.64.£ M•.9Z'lZ.L8 Ce'a G8 S =7
- .�C •lZ .9I.f_ C E 07 M.60•Zb.e8N
_ S87.3 ' 3•E C1'
6
N3637' 59' 9.48S87.35' 13• E 31 0 T�
MLW
54•E74
2'••
2.2 1i
----
TAWBER WINGWALL
3A ' K
4
ffi ;_-_____--. -
12 80�
• 2 n
=hA=
60'
SCALE 1 Q6`-.t�Cf+O.'ti��Y9'�
•. .e
'RAMP
ffF�����
�• •
BOAT
pe
!a. SEAL R
1 BE FILLED
•
1
13343
.6
'���•• 'GINh.•Q Qr4.
i
MARINA FILL PLAN
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
m
HAIR KEEIEgS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PO N
CLIENT: HTB ASSOCIATES .L.L.C. DESIGNED:
` C/O CLYDE HARRIS & ASSOCIATES RDC
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone]
3•
APPROVED:
S3
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 285570/96iE:
FSCAL
"=
ROT D. CULLIPHEk P. 1 60'

--1
m
ED
i-2
0
THE 15'RIPARIAN SETBACK IS WANED BETWEEN THE
FOLLOWING LOTS, BUT DOCK FACILITIES SHALL NOT EXTENT
BEYOND THE LINE SHOWN:LOTS 3,4J2J3J4J5J7J6J9 & 20
` NEW BULKHEAD
PROPOSED FILL LINE
r
1 j / EXLSTINdBULKHEADI
1 / j TO BE REMOVED
TV AEO•'
NIF w u
MAXWELL A, ^ o J A
�v
BROOKS CREEK
a milts
"THE STRAITS"
1
r r i r r r
1 r r 1 r ,G.IiDI �TA
I r I r 1 r r
"ri 1 r r r
°o
.(dn O O
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
SCALE: 1" - 200' •°gam
fQXAYI s YORIC a m a ,eo
PROJECT •:707 ° mushy
SHEET OF
3 OF 7 IN
J
-
N/, CARTERET COUNTY
19X 70'
SA7HT
TRIAWLE
-13RCP
DACE MAIN
TREATMENT PLANT
TRACT ACREAGE 27.96 AC
PUBLIC ACCESS 1.00 AC
CEMETARY
0.97
AC
RIGHT OF WAY
3.40
AC
RESERVED BY
0.70
AC
OWNER
COMMON AREA
5.40
AC
LOT AREA
15.23
AC
NO.. LOTS
28
AVE. LOT SIZE
.544
AC
PAVEMENT AREA
1.2G
AC
ROAD
LWE
rF -IYRCP
ROAD &
ROAD
�gsto

rn
CJ
O
EX. CHANNEL MARKER
N/F �• ' �=•'
MAXWELL
MEM NGN e
.ev a nru
TYP LREP EYEI.BX LOCATION
W.N
EX. CHANNEL MARKER
100 YR. FLOOD ELEV.- 7.0 MSL
COMMUNITY PANEL 3700 43 0729C
REVISED AUGUST 19, 1985
"tme
EXISTING BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
mnm
°�eal1°m
BROOKS CREEK
OE.ArS &i
mam a mrmA.vms
200' 100' O 200' 400'
SCALE 1" - 200'
PROJECT PM707
SHEET • 2 OF 7
t
I
�,•�ri..w
8' CABC
slaLzsr aloav�clmx crTP�
au
TRACT ACREAGE -2796 AC
NUMBER OF L07-S -28
"THE STRAITS"
gt%YIY O
4 -gel
• 'RLse•' _ r•
.. ->dNg •'°Leo: ism' q
L°'-.EXIb71NG OVERHEAD
----- RE[DCATf1T.70�, ''..
NEW RiW y•••
COINAAY/AVA •Ila.x
�
1'�• T - - r d ''I
Nq CARTERLT COUNTY
CURVE
DATA:
61 CENTRAL ANGLE-
10 W 07000
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 76 02 47B85 W
RADIUS.
5
LEH-
09.4W3
'
TANGENT
QO
lBJ6M
M
CHORD
EXTERNAL
4�
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
q)L;gq
xt4v
02 �
3
%
DIRECTION•
63 05 52127 W
RADIUS-
7283112
LENGTH•
ZW532
ti
TANGENT-
185D0D0
CHORD-
29.4638
EXTERNAL-
533B19
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
432558
-
•3 CENTRAL ANGLE-
3 38 50370
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 69 52 02DSS W
RADIUS-
3297,730
T
LENGTH-
2099251
•
TANGENT-
IOSAY17
-•
,
CHORD-
XPB936
'..
EXTERNAL-
W12
•. ;
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
Ism
-
04 CENTRAL ANGLE-
3 37 19D60
••�.:-
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 69 5116.410 W
••
• • •�,
RADIUS-
3/627451
,,• O
LENGTH"
/999334
O�,
TANGENT
CHORD-
IOOD000
199900
•.M1 10'X 70'
EXTERNAL-
SIGHT'
ORDINATE-
1,5797
•' V - ALE
15 CENTRAL ANGLE-
8 54 2RD79
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 6712 41900 W
INTERSECTION
RADIUS-
LENGTH-
1263BM
m5970
.�
TANGENT•
ASTERS ISLAND lA7ADCHORD-
IGODWO
MJ960
& 0,020 VIEW CANE
STA �
EXTERNAL
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
3BB87
3BUO
.
06 CENTRAL ANGLE-
24 49 45235
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 75 10 20.478 W
88 IF -lSACP
RADIUS-
340)O5I
LENGTH-
WF452
TANGENT-
75DOOO
CHORD-
W492S
EXTERNAL-
B1573
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
7%'65
AT 70'SIGHr
07
CENTRAL ANGLE-
5&203
TRIANGLE
CHORD DIRECTION.
S 85 780J W
5 35 4
s sry
RADIUS-
4la2931
LENGTH-
99-Wa
—88 IF -ISRCP
TANGENT-
50D000
NTERSECTION
CHORD-
992932
EXTERNAL-
2.9777
AHARKERS
ISLAND ROAD
& MIDD E ORDINATE•
29567
RKERS POINT ROAD
A 0-OODO
o+az
CAM PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
°�•aROLf�i
MARKERS
POINT
�..... 4 •.
_ IS

rm
m
Co
i L o
NORTH
HRIGGS
I
I`
RIVER
N/F,MOORE
mre
WACO a"
V�ZTA an
9uATmo1T
r•cvm
N/F CARTERET CO.
HARBOR OF REFUGE
BARKERS -
PROPOSED)
500' 250' O 500' 1000' .
SCALE: 1" - 500'
PROJECT •: PM707
SHEET • 1 OF 7
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
SHEET I ............ COVER SHEET
SHEET 2............ HARKER'S POINT SITE PLAN
SHEET 3............ HARKERS POINT CAMA ACTIVITIES
SHEET 4............ MARINA FILL PLAN
SHEET 5............ FORCE MAIN PLAN
SHEET 6............ PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS PLAN
N/F MAXWELL SHEET 7............ DETAIL SHEET
NOTE:
16
v
LITHIS SHEET PROVIDED TO FAMILAR REVIEW PERSONEL
is
WITH LOCATION OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH ADJOINING
IB
u
CHARACTERISTICS. THIS INFORMATION WAS SCANNED FROM
19 D
AERIAL TAX PARCEL YAP AND IS N07 AN ACTUAL SURVEY
OF ADJOINING PARCELS. '
m 12
PO NTE�
D
CEMETARY
'
STRAITS
Z 6
1 7
COVER SHEET
6
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
K a•
lH[A]E$K1E1[$S P®Ilv7C
2
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
'
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RE
WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJ
PHONE: ( 919 ) 237-6701
N
dc�` �C�}A�R�pz,('rrr
APPROVED:
A STROUD ENGINEEMG,P,A. RO
9 .
r
R4
HEST ON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
$EA' ' p
M HEAD CITYY,, N.C. 28557 2/20/S
133a3
( Z�
�J
t nv7-7479
11 eOd� C I • SCALE:
R ONALD D.CULLIPHER , E. 111= 50C

FEB-29-96 THU 11:03 All STRM ENGINEERING PAX NO. 9192474098
P. 1

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Harkers Point a
(IiT'B Associates, L.L.C.)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the
community of Harkers Island, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1989: -155-1, P-7 1984: 38-1215, V-17
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2725900 Y: 359500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-8-96
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 2-20-96
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP - Limited Transitional and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, CW & ES
(C) Water Dependent: Yes and No
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing -
Planned - 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment system
(F) Type of Structures: Existing -
Planned - Future residential development w/associated piers
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0' to moderate
Source - personnel observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
± 880 ft.z
Spartina alterniflora
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
± 21000 ft.2
ex.boat basin bottom
(C) Other
± 5 ac.
High ground
(land disturbed)
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ± 5.5 ac.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to develop a 28 lot subdivision at a site adjacent to
SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
Harkers Point
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The applicants property is a ± 60 acre tract of land
located on the northwestern end of Harkers Island and on the west side of SR 1335
immediately south of the Harkers Island Bridge. The subject of this permit application
is a ± 28 acre portion of this tract which is proposed to be developed into a
subdivision and a 1.5 acre site which is to be used for sewage disposal. The
subdivision tract is bordered on the north by the Straits and on the south by Brooks
Creek, which is also the entrance channel going into the County's Harbor of Refugee
and abuts the Harbor on the southeast side. The majority of the high ground property
consists of woodlands with pine and oak as the dominate species. A dirt drive bisects
the property and provides access to the adjoining property owner located to the west of
the project site. A varying border of coastal and 404 wetlands exists along the
shoreline. On the northeast side (fronting the Straits) a ± 5 to 50' wide sandy beach
area exists along a portion of the shoreline. The remaining shoreline shows signs of
slight to moderate erosion with an erosion scarp having developed. The beach area has
been used for many years as a popular swim beach for the locals in Harkers Island and
the surrounding communities. A ± 150' wide x ± 140' long to -9' mean low water
(M W) basin was excavated into the interior of the property along its northwest
property line around the late 1960's to early 70's. The previous land owner requested
a Dredge and Fill permit to connect the basin into the waters of the Straits. A permit
was issued but it is unclear whether it authorized the entrance channel. According to
historic photography, there was, however, a water connection established from the
basin to the Straits. Today, the bulkhead around the basin has washed away or is
deteriorated to the point of being non-functional. The mouth of the basin has shoaled
in to the point where there is only a small trickle of water flowing out of the basin into
the Straits during low tide conditions. A 6' to 20' border of coastal wetlands vegetated
primarily with spartina altern flora has volunteered along the southern shoreline of the
basin and a ± 10' wide border of spartina altemiflora exist along the Straits just west
of the basin entrance. Scattered clumps of oysters are also located at the mouth of the
basin. Numerous amounts of building and other debris have been deposited along the
shoreline of the basin throughout the -years.
The site has been identified in the past as an area with archaeological potential as well
as having an old cemetery existing on the property. The Harkers Point Cemetery has
not been maintained in recent years and contains the grave sites of many early residents
of Harkers Island. In 1995, the applicant hired an archeological research firm and a
"Phase 11 study" was performed to identify any additional unmarked graves outside of
the cemetery proper and to examine the site for any prehistoric or historical
archaeological sites with significant remains that might be eligible for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places. The results of the survey have been
summarized in a report to the applicant and a copy has been provided to the Division
of Coastal Management and the Division of Archives and History. Anyone wishing to
review the document should contact the Division of Coastal Management's Morehead
City office.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 28 acres into
a 28 lot subdivision with the typical lot size being ± '/z acre in size. Access to the
lots will be provided by two paved private roads which will have direct access to the
Harkers Island Road (SR 1335). A 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment plant with
associated subsurface disposal fields is proposed on a ± 1.5 acre site ± 2,000' south
of the subdivision site. This wastewater facility will not only service this development
but will be available for the future development of the remainder of the property. The
wastewater will be transported to the disposal site by the use of individual pump tanks
with a force main being installed within the right of way of SR 1335. The 4" PVC
force main will buried ± 3' below the existing grade of the roadbed and within the
Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) along an area adjacent to
the County's Harbor of Refuge. Early into the development of this project, the
applicant consulted with state and federal review agencies concerning the possibilities
of re-establishing the marina basin and providing an access channel into the Straits.
Because of the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the access channel
alignment, the applicant abandoned that concept and is now requesting a permit to fill
in the basin to the elevation of adjoining uplands. The shoreline of the Straits
immediately adjacent to the fill area would be bulkhead at the mean high water line and
landward of coastal wetlands. The deteriorated breakwater/bulkhead along the Straits
shoreline would also be removed. The basin filling would result in the loss of ± 880
ft.2 of spartina altern flora marsh and ± 2,100 ft.z of shallow to deep bottom areas
within the basin itself. The development of the subdivision will require the grading of
± 3.4 acres in association with the streets and it's right of way. The construction of
homesites will be left up to the individual purchaser with the low density stormwater
requirements (under Environmental Management Commission rules) limiting the built
upon area for each lot to 30%. Grassed swales are to be located between lots 14 and
15 and lots 4 and 5. These swales will provide drainage relief from the proposed road
system with the terminal ends being located near the shoreline of the Straits. In
addition to the 28 lots, the applicant is proposing to dedicate ± 5.4 acres as a
"Common Area", ± .97 acres as a cemetery site and a ± .9 acre site for beach
access. The proposed beach access site would be dedicated to Carteret County if they
are willing to accept and maintain the area. A portion of the beach access site appears
to be part of the causeway which was created in the construction of the Harkers Island
Bridge. For the most part this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of
the presence of riprap and coastal wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access site
is a sandy beach area. It can also be anticipated that many of the future lot owners
will want to construct piers into the Straits and within the Brooks Creek and the access
channel leading into the County's Harbor of Refugee. The applicant has positioned the
pier alignment on lot 3 to the western property line so that the majority of the beach
area on that lot and to the east will be free from obstacles.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
BARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #4
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the development of
a 28 acre tract of land into a 28 lot subdivision with associated Common Area.
Wetland impacts will be limited to ± 880 ft.2 of primarily spartina alterniflora which
exist within the human made boat basin and ± 21,000 ft.z of estuarine bottom area.
The filling would also require approx 1,500 yds3 of upland fill being placed below the
mean high water line of the basin. While there will be a loss of estuarine bottom,
potential negative water quality impacts from the existing basin would be eliminated.
The scattered amount of oysters at the entrance channel could be easily relocated
outside the fill area and into the open waters of the Straits. Approximately 3.4 acres
will be disturbed in associated with the installation of the road system for the
development. Sewage will be pumped off site to a ± 1.5 acre tract of land located
south of the project site. The applicant has indicated that the approval for this
wastewater treatment plant has not received approval from the Division of Health
Services. Potable water will be supplied by individual wells. The applicant has
designed the development to comply with the low density stormwater rules with no
more than 30% of the individual lots being built upon. Two drainage swales are
proposed and will provide drainage from the road towards the Straits. As a result of
the archaeological findings, a Phase III evaluation is scheduled for the summer of 1996
on lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The applicant has indicated that no development would occur
on these lots until after the study is completed. It can be anticipated that some of the
future lot owners will build piers extending into the navigable waters of the Straits and
Brooks Creek. The specific location of these piers will be left up to the individual
property owners except for lot 3 where the pier will be constructed adjacent to the
western property line. It is not anticipated that any closure of shellfishing waters
would occur within the Straits and the waters of Brooks Creek are already closed. As
a result of the interest shown by the locals, the applicant is setting aside ± .97 acres
for the Marker's Point Cemetery. They have acknowledged that while the proposed
road and development will be private, access' to the cemetery by the public will not be
prohibited. An approx..9 acre beach access site is proposed to be given to Carteret
County. A portion of this area would appear to be within the causeway area created
when the Harkers Island Bridge was constructed. A significant portion of this
causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of previous riprap placement and
the existence of wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access area is primarily a
sand beach which is separated from the adjacent high ground by a 404 wetland area.
As mentioned before, this area has historically been used as a popular beach site for
many of the Down East communities and is intensively used during the summer. The
construction of future piers along the shoreline will prohibit the use of off -road
vehicles from using the beach and will impeded pedestrian access to some degree
beyond the dedicated beach access site.
PREPARED BY: Charles Jones
DATE: February 29, 1996

Form 1JCM-MP-1
APPLICATION14"F-Es 2 1996
(To be completed by all applicants) fir%. ]7 -U L—iI.+,/
�a:va:aaaaLr�aaaawaaia-.ra:�:
b. City, town, community of landmark
1. APPLICANT Harkers Island
c. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: NCSR 1335
Name -R.L. Moore
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City Wilson State N.C.
Zip 27858 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name HTB Associates. L.L.C.
c/o Harris & Associates
Address 2105 West Nash Street
City
Wilson
State N. C.
Zip 27858. Day Phone .[phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Harkers Point
NOTE.• Pernut will be issued in name ojlandbwnerft), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT.
a. County Carteret
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? ; x yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Straits '
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
28 lot subdivision (single family)_
Fill old marina.
Construct bulkhead.'
Sewer force main installation.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private use.
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. To construct 28 lot single
familv subdivision. Eauinment will
include conventional earth moving
_equipment, bulldozer, backhoe, dump
trucks, etc.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1 • . e
4. LAND AND WATER
CFIARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 27.96 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) 20,000 sf and larger
c. Approximate elevation pf tract above MHW or
NWL 5 MHW
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
-Offsite sewage disposal system presently
being reviewed by On -Site Sewage Branch.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. '(For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) surface runoff
throueh swales in a_low-densitv'develou-
ment.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Sandy. Individual wells proposed. No community
source available.
e. Vegetation on tract Wooded/oak and pine
are predominate species.
f.
Man-made features now on tract Old marina.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g.
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Cansuu Me local laird use ptarr.)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
—"A X
ConseryTransitiona`C'm) r�
Developed 'Community
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
Rural Other
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
h.
How is the tract zoned by local government?
claiming' to be the owner of said property, then
Unzoned.
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
i.
Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
from the owner to carry out the project.
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ifappurnbk) .
An accurate, _dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been ;,
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
done for the tract? X Yes No
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
If yes, by whom? Archaeological Reseal-ch
detailed description.)
Consultants, Inc.:(Thomas Hargrove)
k.
Is the project located in a National Registered
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
Historic District or does it involve a National
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
Register listed or eligible property?
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
Yes X No
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
1.
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
Coastal (marsh) x Other _
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes.
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
(Artach docurrientadan, if available)
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained .in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Name Carteret County I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
Address _ Courthouse So., Beaufort NC 28516 grant permission to representatives of state and federal
Phone [phone] review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
Name J. L. Maxwell, Jr.
Address 711 Lakeshore Dr., Goldsboro NC
Phone [phone]
Name Holly Hamilton Briggs
Address 909 Evans St., Morehead City NC
Phone [phone]
SEE ATTAC4"L- )-( FOP. NCDO--
• A list -of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
None.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
27534project. 1�..
I further certify that the information provided in this
28557application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 12th day of Feb. , 19 96 .
Print Name ASvA
,Haarnria
Signature V
Lando r or.1u larked Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
% DCM MP-3
Upland Development
DCM MP-4
Structures Information
DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
FEB 2 0 1998
Revised 03/95
i�W�riatw►poaamaaaaavaaalM�

Form DCM-MT-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
.G H
age..
.
.s
1. ]�XCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes = No
If no attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
Will a disposal area
maintenance? _ Yes
If yes, where?.
be available for future
No
FEB 2 0 1995
Revised 03195 tl�aMawoaoaaa�aaa��l�i7i

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No .
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
X Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
Wooden bulkhead.
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material sand.
i. Source of fill material Unknown to be
purchased from properly licensed
borrow pit.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
..." fJ...-.,.. l•... Y.yY
a. Will fill material be,litougtito site?
X' Yes. :. No`;
If yes, .:.... ........
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water 150 x 150 x 6' AVG = 5.000 CY
(2) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 150
(3) Purpose of fill Fill old upland marina
basin.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 5 (alone
south side of basin).
(2) Purpose of fill Reclaim old inland
marina.
5. GENERAL.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Property constructed
bulkhead and seeding.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example., dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe, trackhoe, dozer, dump trucks.
c. Will wetlands be cr,ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
ime
Revised 63/95 ""

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND E ;,DEVELOPMENT�$ °'
-. �yppiyollorrYi tiiGN\N�plia��
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete, all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project. _.. .. ..
h.
a. Type and numbei'of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 28 single family lots.
i.
b. Number of lots or parcels 28
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) 28 units— [I unit/acre.
Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also;-yequire a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan' been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
X Yes No
If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Offsite wastewater treatment plant.
j. Have the facilities described in Item 1. above
received state or local approval? In review by
(ttfach appropriate documenfadon)On—Site Sewage Branch.
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
including roads, ditches, etc. 5 acre maximum. sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? X -Yes No
If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA
2/16/96 scheduled submittal.
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
Marl and asphalt. -
g. Give the percentage'of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, 'to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used. for
vehicular driveways or parking. 3.0%. MRXIMtJrri
FOIL XNptUfb"-L L6•T J 09e or d Uc-zo PtrLs
LJo LICG WIT14liUNEC,(
Revised 03195
Surface runoff.
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Individual wells.
in. Will water be impounded?
If yes, how many acres? _
Yes X No .
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? NIA
Clyde Harris
AppG O/�� nt Proj4ct N5,
Signature
�21Zo lS (.o
11

JOB
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
Hestron Plaza One SHEETNO. OF
Suite 102
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557 CALCULATED BV DATE
[phone] CHECKED BY DATE
mksweo�xNt �rmami®m�rc.cboniussaian. roamnvxox[mtm[[taroasseo

Narrative
Harker's Point Major CAMA Permit
tEB 2 0 1996
B.INY.v.+ba • •• • •.•a�sw w•►s�iM
HTB Associates, L.L.C. proposes to develop a 27.96 acre parcel of land on the northwestern
end of Harkers Island. The proposed Harker's Point single family subdivision will consist of 28 lots.
All lots will be either waterfront or water view and will allow for a large common area protecting the
integrity of the property leading to the Harkers Point Cemetery and the Maxwell property to the west.
The project has additional property to the south which has not had its development planned
with the exception of a 60,000 gpd tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields.
This system is currently being reviewed by the On -Site Sewage Branch.
During the planning process leading to the Major CAMA Permit submittal, several issues came
to light and were addressed as follows:
Harker's Point Cemetery
Harker's Point Cemetery has been an unmaintained cemetery containing the grave sites of
many early residents of Harker's Island. Following site evaluations by Mr. John Clauser of the N.C.
Department of Archives and History, many of the previously documented sites were located and the
proposed boundary of the cemetery was established.
Local citizens have indicated their desire to form the Harkers Point Preservation Committee to
manage and maintain the historical significance and heritage of this island cemetery. The developer
has encouraged and has appreciated the assistance provided by the island residents. While the
proposed new roadway construction is to be private, access to the cemetery is a right conceded to the
public. The developer will continue to work with the preservation group to restore the cemetery site.
Archaeological Findinnc
Following the disclosure of a study conducted by Thomas Loftfield in 1969 which found
artifacts along the north shoreline of this tract, Mr. Thomas Hargrove of Archaeological Research
Consultants,Inc. was retained to conduct an assessment of the tract. His report is attached. Phase III
archaeological evaluations are scheduled for this summer on Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9.
Filling the Previously Constructed Inland Marina
The original plan for this development included interior
ordinance to have adequate water access. The site has an inland
maintenance, has had its access channel silt -in and the bulkhead
with state and federal personnel indicated that with the presence
permitting would be difficult to re -dredge to the facility.
lots, which were required by local
basin marina which, through lack of
has deteriorated. Early discussions
of SAV in the channel alignment,
Since it is not likely that the inland basin would be permitted to be reconstructed, it is
desirable to fill the basin and associated wetlands that were created at the boat ramp and re-establish
the site to its original grade.
Public Use of the Beach
Prescriptive use of the beach at the north end of the tract has been a consideration of our
design. Lots I and 2 are to be water view without riparian rights to construct piers. Lot 3 will be
restricted to pier construction along the western property line.
The resulting property of 1.00 acres is to be donated to Carteret County and used for a public
beach access.

HARKERS ISLAND ROAD
2x10 TREATED
CAP ----\
4x6 WALER
6x6 @ 8' O.C.-
W/8' EMBEDMENT
------------------------
'ROJECT •: PM707
MEET • 7 OF 7
ROAD SECTION
SCALE: 1"=10'
FILTER
CLOTH
5/8' 0 GALVANIZED
WITH THREADED ENDS,
/— WASHER AND NUTS
'— DEADMAN
2x1 0 T8.G WITH @ 8' O.C.
4' EMBEDMENT
BULKHEAD DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=30'
GXRON'�i,,
S •'"si4'• %.
•aF�q�...:
)ETAIL SHEET
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
HARKERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RQC
WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
PHONE: ( 919 ) 237-6701 DJV
APPROVED:
RDC
ENGINEERING, P.A.
PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
CITY, N.C. 28557
_
D. CULLI R, P.E.
DATE:
2/20/96
CALF:
AS SHOWN

PROPOSED DEDICATION OF 1.00 AC
OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY.
LOTS I & 2 RESERVES THE RIGHT °-2.72
TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK- =3.37
WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO
THE BEACH AREA IN ACCORDANCE '-3.22
=1.74
WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WAIVE THE 15'
SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION °-2.54
OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN.-1.39
APPROX. AREA ---1.00 ACRES I--. --I29
I APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER
PIER ALIONRENT
LINE 35
-3.45
-3.40
024 0320
AEFr=
._ 7b'
.
SEf•_. ' CONNECTION 0
vFYft
- 28
053
olo
OD8
ISLAND
' 6 /
' NG7J5'5
I 30.67
«T x Ya
SIGHr
Q�p?'7:
TRIANGLE
y
INTERSECTION
HERS ISLAND ROAD
STRAITS VIEW LANE
LF -ISRCP
100, 50, 0 100, 200'
SCALE: 1" — 100'
FEB 2019M
PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA
�.*•••�•••••••••••+ CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
'H A11RKERS POINT
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
.OQ�J1CAgp12CLIENT CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED
�`�_,•'�FESS/0•.9': ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
_ QQO ys, L WILSON. N.C. 2785E DRAWN:
SEAL 9<� DJV
PHONE: [phone]
13343 APPROVED:
90 �.cc -- 0 •�tvQ� g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
�'.,'L �'•:y,�a,1NE;�•'• Z �q HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
PROJECT •: PM707 ypot
40 u,,`�� M1 I T 4 9TY, N C. 28557 j 2/20/96
_ ZvJ`�% SCALE:
SHEET • 6 OF 7 0 ALD

6[.•
f �
`2
+R.
G�RPg .R •• • a n NJ
t
'+
' �•e •
91Y-09'-01'Y
uey
• ge�,I
\•
��
n•<i� +
64 IF -I9ACP
FONE
SFRUC
CO
ENTRANCE
RESE
}
INrERSEMON
�Pg�
ED
•• \OE-•,
•'•••'1d,
474
\.\,
,,$$,,p �
NARKERS ISLAND ROAD &
NARKERS POW -ROAD
•
_ S
_
y6_
w V �@.,
� . �s •_
mob'
rt vrlerfur_
L. +4aY A OOODO
� x• 9�asr
HIP
YOORE
I � �
1 / �
1 / �
I
I
EXISTING PRECAST BULKHEAD
TBN IN LIGHT POLE
ELEV.- 5.43 MSL
SEE ROAD SECTION
DETAILS SHEET B DF 6
A
I
1
100, 60, 0 100, 200'
....... .. r SCALE: 1" - 100'
FEB:019m�3 it
1 Il
' FORCE MAIN PLAN
�'•'-���•••�w.�.wa.wwwM�F IIr CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
IIHAIRKiEfIRIS POINT
I
osli III
IIt I HARKERS ISLAND• CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
rAIROZZ aAll .� CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
.� O .. ESSIO
.60 � �9�; s ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREETRnr
?a SEAL WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
t 133A3 ° ¢ PHONE: (919 ) 237-6701 DJV
APPROVED:
O' :°NGI+;'`• g STROUD ENGINEERING,P.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
EHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96
PROJECT •: PM707 -7 9
SHEET • 5 OF 7 SLR �L -
2-6 SCALE:
RONALD D. CULL HER, P.E. 1 100

O -3.15 438 LF NEW WOODED BULKHEAD -3,01
FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED -
BY CAMA OFFICALS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION -SEE SHEET 6 OF 6
0
0.64 FOR DETAIL SECTION. -0.81
_......_e
MLW -------------- 63._ " O dl:48. ..
2.590 A....•
_ a!' �F7' � $64 `
MHW v�� 11 � ] 3 \ ° \ `�y
TIMBER ;'W/N,GWALL
�OPi OF B
42
!co zz 1
• I-� L ,
1
N/F
MAXWELL
PROJECT •:PM707
SHEET • 4 OF 7
-3.36
°
O
O -3.08 -2.96
O -2.73
2.92 O
-2.39
•l,� .
.
00.96
£.v9•w.. 0.76
00.77 o I
O_1.74 0.881
0-6.58
°-7.81 2.05 ! ° 0-0.38
1 1.59
0-6.96
EXTENSION OF I o o
-5.98
O1
PROPERTY LINE -' _
:W
^'
ONCE FILLED
0 5.71 O_9.27 1
a3. 3.
m
.01
-0.61
A
O -7.24
8.96
00-1.0E
_ 0.9 9
T
o
-5.90
I O -7.89 C
1
-8.3 o
I O
o -e.e6 I � '-
F40Arrol
%PA.
EXISTING BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
404 WETLANDS
"'----•--•�' -•0.�6- •---•--....--z
1.., .mn. �• a�� F o 163.65--(TOTAU--S,
90-0L I['B[Epa
I LB•
•LB
IZ'9
S87. 35'13'E .. 31 •0
TOP OF
••
8.39 MLW
AALAN
2.
54• E 74,
2 .... ..........12Ld7i
....................
2.48
TfdNBER WINGWALL
BASK
w
v ..
Z
30, O
60'
S C A L E= 1'
'RAMP
�
BOAT
2
BE FILLED
MARINA FILL PLAN its,
CAMAPERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
®LNSV
IAIRKryIRS
P�6j.
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
mm
9 = mN m
CLIENT: HTB ASSOCIATES .L.L.C. DESIGNED:
` C/O CLYDE HARRIS & ASSOCIATES RDC
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
?
S3
STROUD ENGDMERING,P.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96
_ L I SCALE: 1d� 7I� "=
/ / RO ALD D. CULLIPHER P. 1 60'

THE 15' RIPARIAN SETBACK 1S WANED BETWEEN THE
FOLLOWING LOTS BUT DOCK FACILITIES SHALL NOT EXTENT
BEYOND THE LINE SHONN. LOTS 3,4J2J3J4J5J7J8J9 & 20
\ NEW'BULKHEAD
PROPOSED FILL LINE
j l i 1 EXISTINCil BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED I
i Q
L
NIF
MAXWELL
- - -1�
PoIARKER'S
r'�ir� rtn
rn
1 If /
----+ BROOKS CREEK /
aa®o�
ff
"THE STRAITS"
1
l i i
1 I i 1 1 1
EXISTING OVERHEAD
Fa#m TO RE
RELOCATED TO
NEW RAN
200' 100' O 200' 400'
SCALE: 1" = Pool �p ryp {
F.CZpI"� O .OE.Al1 m a ic.0
PROJECT •:OF707 swimssA•xAaEuurmam ',
SHEET 3 OF 7
55.4 XRESS�
N? CAMP= CO9"Y
TRACT ACREAGE
27.96
AC
PUBLIC ACCESS
1.00
AC
CEMETARY
0.97
AC
RIGHT OF WAY
3.40
AC
RESERVED BY
0.70
AC
OWNER
COMMON AREA
5.40
AC
LOT AREA
15.23
AC
NO. LOTS
28
AVE LOT SIZE
.544
AC
PAVEMENT AREA
1.26
AC
4S /SLAND ROM
VrS VIEW LANE
MOD
IF -1SRCP
15'RCP
MRSECTIGN
ZW ISLAND ROAD &
MRS PoINT ROM
PLANT
sslo
4r
.m S < e!zz
90 FNGti` ° j

EX.CHANNEL MARKER
NIF
MAXWELL
haste
EX. CHANNEL MARKER
100 YR. FLOOD ELEV.- 7.0 YSL
COMMUNITY PANEL 3700 43 0729C
REVISED AUGUST 19, 1985
E
EXISTING BULKHEAD
—TO BE REMOVED
BROOKS CREEK
x u�f.
rrr erg aTarns LOCAnON .zrxm . m..w-.
.w
200' 100' O 200' 400'
SCALE• 1" — 200'
PROJECT •: PM707
SHEET • 2 OF 7
Li .I
'fie,,L
♦ M
e-case
WIHQE CAm99CIIDN (ESP)
TRACT ACREAGE -276A6 AC
NUMBER OF LOTS -28
"THE STRAITS"
77
£X/bTM1G OVERHEAD
POWER -TO, BE ,y
REDDCATED',TOyy ',•
' -MEW Rill' - nI y • -
'N,,A
1
N/Y CARTERET COUNTY
CURVE DATA:
#1 CENTRAL ANGLE-
O 00 01000
CHORD DIRECTION•
N 76 02 47885 W
RMLUS•
/257.3ow
LENGTH-
M"J
TANGENT-
IOTODO
CHORD-
29"
EXTERNAL-
48027
MIDDLE ORDINATE•
47841
xzT4xac
*2 CENTRAL ANGLE-
71 42 39976
CHOW DIRECTION.
$ 63 05 52327 W
h
RAOR/5-
Z283112
r
LENGTH-
2657532
TAVGENr•
1654000
CHORD-
267.4638
EXTERNAL-
53_T619
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
432658
•3CENTRAL ANGLE-
3 38 50370
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 69 52 02DO W
RADIUS-
3197J730
LENGTH-
2099291
•
TANGEM•
OSOOOO
,
CHORD-
2O9g¢36
EXTERNAL-
W12
•
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
IG703
04 CENTRAL ANGLE
3 37 194W
••i•:'
CHORD DIRECTION-
N 69 SAW W
••
RADRIS-
3927451
..
LENGTH-
1999334
1
H. +
TANGENT-
CHOR
EEXT RNAL
1000000
15605
O'X 70,
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
I57w
P RILE
•5 CENTRAL AVGLE-
65428.079
CHORD DIRECTIOW
N 67 2 41" W
RALW/S
1263BBSO
sib
IMTERSECTION
LENGTH-
99M70
'
ARKL:RS /SUVO
ROAD NT-
C CHORD.
100DOOO
99
& STRAlIS VIEW I t EXTERNAL-
-3960
38B87
A
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
38770
-6 CENTRAL ANGLE-
24 49 45235
CHORD DNRECrOV-
N 75 IO 20.478 W
88 IFIT RCP RADIUS-
340705/
LENGTH-
147,6452
TANGENT-
75DDOO
CHORD-
146.4926
EXTERNAL-
8H.93
MIDDLE ORDINATE-
7%'65
O'X 70'SORT
.7
CENTRAL ANGLE
5
TRIANGLE
CHORD DIRECTION-S
85 47 35 4Id0.3 W
E -rN
LENGTH-
995278
88 IF -L4 RCP
TANGENT-
50ODOO
INTERSECTION
CHORD.
EXTERNAL-
2_q m
HARKERS ISLAND ROAD
6 MIDDLE ORDINATE-
2ArY+7
HARKERS PDINT ROAD
HARKERS POINT
M. mm HVjs DY6.R
2 m ....C. SIISCxr..ST DE1.1
IL501. . c.

9i:
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
SHEET 1............COVER SHEET
(SHEET 2............ HARKER'S POINT SITE PLAN
SHEET 3............HARKERS POINT CAMA ACTIVITIES
SHEET 4............MARINA FILL PLAN
SHEET 5............ FORCE MAIN PLAN
SHEET 6............ PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS PLAN
N/F ILA%WELL SHEET 7............ DETAIL SHEET
NORTH RIVER
NOTE
6
pj�i/gg 19 1.) THIS SHEET PROVIDED TO FAMILAR REVIEW PERSONEL
BRIGGS 18 u ♦ WITH LOCATION OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH ADJOINING
BROOKS CREEK 14 CHARACTERISTICS. THIS INFORMATION WAS SCANNED FROM
19 11 AERIAL TAX PARCEL MAP AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL SURVEY
OF ADJOINING PARCELS.
N/F MOORE m u BARKERS
FUTURE DEVELOPMEN ss POINT
= u CEMETARY
rroro� u 10
mono a♦c
♦r u' STRAITS
ncam ss 0. 9
sb
b COVER SHEET
6
CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS
♦
. ]H[AIRK ERD S POINT
F
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
I C
w NIP CARTERET CO. 1 CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED:
N HARBOR OF REFUGE ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC
by BARKERS WILSON, N.C. 27858 DRAWN:
(PROPOSED) `,�\.kGI1H81jfr� PHONE: [phone] DJV
500 250 O 500 1000, NCARpz ♦4 APPROVED:
HAR&E_��1� / �5}� a� SMOUD ENGINEERING,Pei. RDC
%SCALE = 1 " - 500,
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 • DATE:
;2 SEAL L rA..NALMD;.CeLLIp6HER9..
HEAD CITY. N.C. 28557 2/20/96
2-4-7-74��"y�
PROJECT •: PM707 = S !33a3 <� " 4 "' SCALE:
SHEET • 1OF 7 :JE. 1 "= 500'

FHB-29-96 THU 11:03 AM STROUD ENGINEERING PAX NO. 9192474OSS
P. 1

CA-0?
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
CARTERET COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
BEAUFORT, NC 28516 [phone]
A 10`s9
Page of 5—
IMPROVEMENT PERMIT
• NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT IS ISSUED
• NO AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL MODIFICATION (IF REQUIRED) IS APPROVED
G.S. 130a-336
IMPROVEMENT PERMIT
Subject to revocation if site plans or
if site is altered or intended use is changed.
PERM
�YBY:
1L/HEMEAALTH SPECIALIST
DATE: G•- M.E. CLASSIFICATION
EW CONSTRUCTION
REPAIR
/ / EXISTING SYSTEM
S

SITE MODIFICATION &i QV IR.EMENTS
GRADING MODIFTCATION ❑
House placement shall allow for gravity flow to septic system or COMMENTS:
pump system shall be required
GRADE AREA:
CO(M�MENTS:
w WT
LPP SPECIFICATIONS No
SEPTIC TANK: SPECIFICATIONS.
PUMP TANK:
DRAINFIELD:
LTAR:
Plans for the LPP system shall be prepared by a person having a
demonstrated knowledge of LPP's, such as an engineer licensed with
the State of North Carolina.
The system shall be designed according to Section 1900 of the State
Sewage Rules.
LPP plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Carteret County
Environmental Health Division. Other requirements such as fill
and/or grading may also be necessary.
A contract between the owner and a certified operator shall be
required for the purposes of maintenance and operation of the above
septic system.
11on lam"
AMOUNT OF SAND
FILL AREA
I.P. 1
PAGE 3 OF OF 3
DATE: bI L
o a t y LVA V LIJOLN
TOPSOIL AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLED
STANDARD PROCEDURES:
1. Fill material shall be applied in three stages:
a. The rill area should be cleared of any vegetative cover or
organic litter and disked to a depth of six inchas.
b. Two to three inches of Group I Sand is placed in rill area and
disked or mixed in with the original soil to a -depth of six inches.
c. When b. is completed, the remainder of the Group I Sand can
be added to the specified area and then inspected by this office.
FILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS, TRASH, ROCK CLAY BALLS, HARD PAN
MATERIAL OR ANY OTHER THAN SAND.
2. Topsoil installation:
a. After the system is installed according to the IMPROVEMENT
PERMIT and inspected by this office, the topsoil can be installed
b. The topsoil will be Group II Sandy Loam or Loam. The topsoil
shall be limed and/or fertilized if necessary to promote vigorous
growth of grass.
c. The entire filled area shall be seeded with perennial grass seed.
C7
*Prior to any changes in system layout, approval must be obtained from Health Department. bASi� �,�7 C-1 � -5d
*NOTICE: Construction must comply with all state and local regulations. Do not install well until well site has been approved. (45
"NOTICE: Beware much property in Carteret County is subject to Wetland Regulations and properties containing wetlands should receive
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers prior to development.
WHEN THIS MODIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED PLEASE NOTIFY THIS OFFICE AND ANOTHER
IMPROVEMENTS ARE SATISFACTORY, AN AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE ISSUED.
(OFFICE USE FOR FIELD NOTES ONLY)
MODIFICATION INSPECTION BY:
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
INSTALLER:
JUL 0 9 1996
fron
COMMENTS: Y•�•••u•...+•p•+•+Yf�. /
(REV.3/96)c•'
Mod

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
CARTERET COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
BEAUFO��RT,, NC 28516 [phone]
t,--& - LV�
AUTHORIZATION FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION
(NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE ISSUED
UNTIL OPERATION PERMIT MS BEEN ISSUED)
Pagel —of 1.51 1.
G.S. 130a-336
VALID FOR FIVE (5) YEARS
Subject to revocation if site plans or
if site is altered or intended use is changed.
u,9
DATE: M.E. CLASSIFICATION
AUT TION FOR ;STEZk SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION BY:
ENVIR ENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
(REV.03/96) CW
IP
/ 7Q W CONSTRUCT
/ / REPAIR
/ / EXISTING SYSTEM
JUL 0 9 19yE
�U

I.P. `
PAGE Z, OF
CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
PAGE Z OF .Z
SITE PL
s/z!g� > Iz-Q ot(�
__rr ff atiCtl`a'��� el�
,.tom J�sy-<4e, so u
a kVt:--v ctol b,j
sm-
L)
Y't 1 oar-�V-�•`-- e�.��S�---tC �3 �e.�<<�J \ .P('t U� - �a
ELECT CAL PERMIT RE UIREM YES ) NO( )
OWNER: L• '�
A��DDRESS: 1
.Y%-Ic Z7:r-q PHONE kill - - Za S-r4
TAX PARCEL: —31 —
PROPERTY LOCATION: 14,c o\
SUBDIVISION: � S 10
LOT,Z BL CK
TYPE STRUCTURE: 4 AC..
NO. BEDROOMS: y NO. BATHS:
NO. PEOPLE:'Mc X 2ZA DESIGN FLOW: L`3 LH Q�i iae
GARBAGE GRINDER: YES f NO( )
SEPTIC T NK: A.TTL
A K: GAL.
NO. LI TOT . FT.
WATER SOURCE:<P
HORIZONTAL DISTAN`CEEPPROM WELL: FT.
SITE MODIFIED: YES f7`i'' ,N ) `
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS: C= ' ;['•1IE
• STRUCTURE. SHALL BE PLACED O THAT GRAVITY
FLOW IS ACHIEVED OR PUMP SYSTEM SHALL BE
REQUIRED.
• DO NOT PARK, PAVE, DRIVE, OR BUILD OVER ANY PART
OF SEPTIC SYSTEM OR REPAIR AREA.
• MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 5 FEET BETWEEN ANY
FOUNDATION AND ANY PART OF SEPTIC SYSTEM OR
REPAIR AREA.
✓ ,Am
�c'r'. aims
*SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED
UNDER WET CONDITIONS
*Trench bottom depth to be no deeper than
1 naturally occurring surface.
Easement Required: Yes No
Drainage Maintenance Req. Surface ( bsurface ( )
Maintain Mini mm''10' From��Water. �Lin�e +
Comments: �ft& �L'l— e•—eG
U ves�, AIM41A•
*Prior to any changes in system la L approval must be obtained
from Health Department. (� � J U L C
*NOTICE: Construction must comjIY�{it I gt nd local
regulations. Do not install well un� we srte tas en approved
on inspection.
*NOTICE: Beware much property in Carteret County is subject
to Wetland Regulations and properties containing wetlands
should receive approval from U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers
prior to development.
FOR SYSTEMS REQUIRING LESS THAN 18" TRENCH
BOTTOMS, A MINIMUM OF 6" SOIL COVER
IS REQUIRED AND MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
FILL OF AT LEAST GROUP II SANDY
LOAM TEXTURE.
(OFFICE USE FOR FIELD NOTES ONLY
MODIFICATION INSPECTION, BY:
ENVIRONMENTAL HEA4.T1.4 cPFCIALIST
DATE:
INSTALLER:
COMMENTS:

ti^ QG
7y.h2-.9
5Sb —Y-? rct/ V
`oal�ssh �9 saU
'Yaso�o��
14
`/' U b /I1/^ of

1982�O
f
p
Q�a--�
�� ni
ap�k
�i
"Listen out there! We're George and Harriet
Miller! We just dropped in on the pigs for coffee!
We're coming out! ... We don't want trouble!"
SC.
T�inCr%ck's
27Ay

CARTERET COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
Courthouse Square, Beaufort, NC 28516
W. W. Burgess, Director
19 June 1996
Mr. Doug Huggett
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
DEHNR
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Huggett:
� EC�ivED+
JUN 241996
COASTAL
MANAGEMENT
Since Mr. Burgess is no longer employed by this office your let-
ter to Mr. Burgess dated 04/23/96 has been referred to me for a
response on behalf of Ms. Carolyn Mason, our Acting Health
Director.
You are correct by stating that our agency has expertise in the
area of site plan review and issuance of permits dealing with
large and small wastewater systems in Carteret County per State
Regulations.
While small system permitting and approval require periodic
program oversight by our State On -Site Program, the type system
proposed at Harkers Island is classified as a large on -site was-
tewater collection, treatment and disposal system.
Large systems permitting approvals require much scrutiny and plan
review not only at the local level, but in fact cannot be per-
mitted until the proposed project siting soils and engineered
system plans have met the approval of our State On -Site Was-
tewater Program. Prior to making recommendation for approval by
the On -Site Wastewater Program, the engineers of that program
receive comments from other state agencies such as the
Groundwater Section of the Division of Environmental Management.
It is my understanding that this Harkers Island Project is one if
not the first (at least in Carteret County) to receive this man-
dated pump testing prior to permitting.
Health Center [phone]
Fax [phone]
Environmental Health [phone]
Fax [phone]

Page 2
Mr. Doug Huggett
June 19, 1996
Travel time of effluent to reach the sound is certainly a concern
and has been reviewed by both the Groundwater Section and the On -
Site Wastewater Section of the Division of Environmental Health.
Copies of these reviews are being furnished along with a letter
of recommendation for permitting of the twenty-eight (28) four
(4) bedroom homes. Both site and engineered plan review for
project expansion will require a review and approval from the
State On -Site Wastewater System Program just as this first phase
obtained.
As previously mentioned above, our permits on large systems (over
3,000 gal/day) are under state mandated rules and require State
Program review prior to issuance of a permit from the local
health department. I trust that the comments from our state
agency review (Mr. Victor D'Amato's memo) will answer your con-
cerns regarding item #2 of Mr. Miller's letter.
Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact
this office at 728-8499.
ISincerely., _A
�rV `��A oge L. Melville, R.S.
Environmental Health Supervisor II
RM/cw
Enclosures

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
HESTRON PLAZA ONE
SUITE 102
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
[phone]
Mr. Doug Huggett
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
RE: Harkers Point Subdivision
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Huggett,
May 24, 1996
,
R rj
MAY29 , �S
Mhi9;.u��i•yl
We are in receipt of your April 19, 1996 correspondence concerning the above
referenced project. Based on your comments, we would like to provide the following:
Item #1(a) We have submitted our present application for the 28 lots and this 28
lot subdivision is our proposed project. The 28 lot subdivision received
"Preliminary Plat" approval from the Carteret County Planning Board on
May 13, 1996.
The 41 lots were previously proposed which was the same 28 lots
described above plus 13 lots between the two streets. The developer
has decided to preserved this interior area and has designated the
acreage as common area.
Item #1(b) Additional plans for the acreage to the south of this subdivision adjacent
to the treatment plant have not been developed. We do envision some
type of residential development, possibly patio home sites. Whatever
plan ultimately develops would be submitted to your agency for permit
approval.
Item #2 The treatment plant is a proposed 60,000 gpd extended aeration dual
train treatment system with tertiary treatment and subsurface LPP
disposal. We have enclosed a set of plans that was submitted to the
On -Site Sewage Branch for your use. Also enclosed is the On -Site
Sewage Branch Site Approval for the 28 lot subdivision.
Item #3 The NCDEM Stormwater approval is enclosed as requested.
107 COMMERCE ST.
HESTRON PLAZA ONE
SUITE B
SUITE 102
GREENVILLE, NC 27858
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
[phone]
[phone]

Stroud Engineering, P.A.
May 24, 1996
Page 2
item #4 The NCDOT encroachment agreement is enclosed as requested.
We hope the foregoing addresses your concerns and if we can provide any additional
information please let me know.
erely,
Ronald D. Cullipher, P.E.
RDC/kw
cc: Charles Jones
Clyde Harris
File:47Muggetuxt

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
e��
IDEHNR
May 17, 1996
Mr. Clyde P. Harris
IM Associates, L.L.C.
2105 West Nash Street
Wilson, North Carolina .27893
Subject: Permit No. SW8 960310
Harker's Point Subdivision
Low Density Subdivision Stormwater Project
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Harris:
The Wilmington Regional Office received the Stormwater Application for Harker's Point Subdivision on March
7, 1996, with final information on April 25, 1956. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined
that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC
2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit. No. SW8 960310 dated May 17, 1996, to HTB Associates, L.L.C..
This permit shallbe.effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the conditions
and limitations as specified therein, and does not supercede any other agency permit that may be required.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit.
This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O..Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC
27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact either Linda
Lewis or'me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ave Adkins
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
DAlarl: S:\WQS\STORMWAT\PERMIT\960310.MAY
cc: AR . u a]liph—w—"VA
Garry Yeomans, Carteret County Inspections
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
Linda Lewis
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State Stotmwater Management Systems
Permit No.SW8 960310
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as amended,
and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
HTB Associates, L.L. C.
Harker's Point Subdivision
Carteret County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of a 25 % low density development in compliance with the provisions
of 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules") and the approved stormwater
management plans and specifications, and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by
the Division of Environmental Management and considered a part of this permit for Harker's Point Subdivision.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the following
specific conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
The allowable built -upon area per lot is 7,934 square feet, based on 28 lots. CAMA regulations
may reduce the allowable built -upon area for those lots within the AEC.
2. The overall tract built -upon area percentage or lot sizes for the project must be maintained at
levels at least as stringent as the low ,density levels specified in the stormwater rules. These
levels are summarized below (more stringent levels may apply in accordance with the rules):
3. The reserved lot is restricted to 7,514 square feet of impervious area. Additional impervious area
can be allowed only if an engineered stormwater system is provided. A stormwater management
permit for that activity must be obtained prior to development. The common area is restricted
to .23 acres of impervious area.

State Stormwater. Management Systems
Permit Nm.sw8 960310
DEVELOPMENT THAT IS WITHIN:
LOW DENSITY LEVEL:
The twenty coastal counties
30 %
One-half mile of and draining to SA waters
25%
One mile of and draining to HQWs
12% or 1 acre lots
Defined management area for Freshwater ORWs
12% or 1 acre lots
3. The development must demonstrate that no areas within the project site are of such high density that
stormwater runoff threatens water -quality.
4. Approved plans and specifications for projects covered by this permit are incorporated by reference and
are enforceable parts of the permit.
.5. The only runoff conveyance systems allowed will be vegetated conveyances such as swales with
minimum side slopes of 3:1 (H: V) or curb outlet systems as defined in the stormwater roles and
approved by the Division.
6. No piping shall be allowed except:
a. That minimum amount necessary to direct runoff beneath an impervious surface such as a road.
b. That minimum amount needed under driveways to provide access to lots.
7. Projects covered by this permit will maintain a minimum 30 foot wide vegetative buffer between all
impervious areas and surface waters.
8. Each of the lots in the subdivision will be limited to no more than the amount of built -upon area
indicated in the approved plans and consistent with item 1 above. Any lot inside the AEC subject to
CAMA regulations may have the built -upon area reduced due to additional CAMA requirements.
9. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area does not exceed the
allowable built -upon area. Once the lot transfer is complete, the built -upon area may not be revised
without approval from.the permittee, and responsibility for meeting the built -upon area limit is .
transferred to the individual property owner.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No.SW8 960310
10. Deed restrictions are incorporated into this permit by reference and must be recorded with the Office
of the Register of Deeds prior to the sale of"any lot. A copy of the recorded restrictions must be
received by this Office within 30 days of the date of recording. Recorded deed restrictions must
include, _as a_ minimum, the following statements related to stormwater management:
a. A statement of the allowable built -upon area per lot in the following form:
"The allowable built -upon area per lot is 7,934 square feet, inclusive of that portion of the
right-of-way between :the front lot line and the edge of the pavement, structures, pavement,
walkways of brick, stone, slate, but not including wood decking. The reserved lot is restricted
to 7,514 square feet of impervious area, and the common_ area is restricted to .23 acres of
impervious area.-"
b. Items related to stormwater management must remain in the deed restriction, and this must be
indicated by including the following:
"The covenants pertaining to stormwater regulations may not be changed or deleted without
concurrence of the State."
C. To assure that vegetated conveyances are not piped (in accordance with item 5) deed restrictions
must indicate that:
"Filling in or piping of any vegetative conveyances (ditches, swales, etc.) associated with the
development except for average driveway crossings, is strictly prohibited by any persons."
11. The Engineer/Owner/Developer/Permittee must certify in writing that theproject's stormwater controls,
and impervious surfaces have been constructed within substantial intent of the approved plans and
specifications. Any deviation from the approved plans must be noted on the Certification.
12. The following items will require a modification to the permit. Revised plans, specifications and
calculations must be permitted prior to the permittee begmriing construction on the modification:
a: Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area.
e. Further subdivision of the project area.
f. Filling in, altering or piping any vegetative conveyance shown on the approved plan.
In addition, the Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a modification
to the permit.
13. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the permittee shall
submit a written time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements.
The permittee shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the
changes have been made.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No.SW8 960310
H. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The permittee shall comply with the followingschedule for construction and maintenance of the Low
Density Option stormwater systems:
a. Swales and other vegetated conveyances shall be constructed in their entirety, vegetated, and be
operational for their intended use prior to the construction of any built -upon surface except
roads.
b. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the swales or
other vegetated conveyances will be repaired immediately.
2. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to operate the
permitted stormwater management systems at optimum efficiency to include:
a. Inspections
b Sediment removal.
C. Mowing, and revegetating of the side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and specifications.
3. The permittee shall submit recorded deed restrictions limiting built -upon area per lot in accordance with
Part I item 10 within 30 days of the date of recording.
4. The permittee shall submit the Engineer/Owner/Designer/Permittee Certification in accordance with Part
I Item 11 within 30 days of completion of the project.
5. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his representative within the
time frame specified in the written information request.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the_Permittee to
an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management, in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
2. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
3. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The filing of a request for
a permit in revocation and reissuance, or termination does not stay any permit condition.
4. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the permit,
revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and
regulations contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 211.1000;
and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 et. al.

State Slormwater Management Systems
Permit No.SW8 960310
5. The permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to and approval by the Director. The
Director may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the name and
incorporate such other requirements as may be. necessary. A formal permit request must be submitted
to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by the appropriate fee, documentation from
both parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this
request will be considered on its merits, and may or may not be approved.
6. The Permittee grants permission to Regional. Office Staff to enter the property for the purpose of
inspecting all components of the permitted stormwater facility.
7. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state and
federal) which have jurisdiction.
Permit issued this the 17th day of May, 1996
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 960310

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT M
NORTH CAROLINA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICA oAR 0 % 1996 L'
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name Harkers Point Subdivision .
2. Location, directions to project (include County, Address, State Road) Attach map. Carteret County, Harkers
Island Twsp.,.NCSR 1335.
....14 .
TS,. Assx"a-ems �;L.I.C.
3. Owner's Name Rr�Moor e Phone [phone]
4. Owner's Mailing Address c/o Harris & Associates, 2105 West Nash Street
City Wilson State N.C. Zip 27893
5. Application date 2/27/96 Cre-2o6nAeJJ 25-7&) Fee enclosed $ 225.00
6.NearestReceivingStmam Straits l Br6ok-S C(-ecL Class SA
7.Projectdescription_ 28 lot single family .subdivision.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION
1. Permit No.(Pobefrlledin byDFrN)
2.Permit Type
X
New
Renewal
Modification (existing Permit No.)
3. Project Type:
X
Low Density
_Detention_
Infiltration Other:_ Redevelop _General Dir Cert
4. Other State/Federal Permits/Approvals Required (check appropriate blanks)
CAMA Major X Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404 Permit
M. BUILT UPON AREA (Please see NCAC 2RIoo5 thru .Io07for applicable density limits)
Classification
Allowable Impervious Area
Total Project Area
Drainage Drainage
Basin Basin
SA
25%
27.96
Breakdown of Imneryious Area
(Please indicate below the design impervious area)
Buildings 5.10 ac
Streets 1.32 ac
Parking/SW -
0.405 AleL pe.—
Proposed Impervious Area 4-.99-6.F23 . Other_ 0,-S7 ac RVr- s•rv-9�
% Impervious Area -2-5P V- 76 Totals 4-.93 ac G. $Z3
IV. STORMWATER TREATMENT
(Describe how the runoff will be treated)
Grass lined swales[ f02c15r0¢ �t'><G/25.

V. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded
for the type of project applied for.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit,. that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the covenant cannot be changed or deleted without
concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VI. OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
I, Clyde P. Harris certify that the information included on this permit
(Please print or type name clearly) _
application form is correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that
the deed restrictions will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge,
the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A NCAC 211.1000.
I authorize the below
VIL AGENT
Person or firm name
or firm to
(MUST BE COMPLETED)
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
plans on my behalf.
Date
Mailing Address
--- Hestron Plaza
One, Suite
102
City Morehead
City State
N.C. Zip
28957 Phone [phone]
Please submit application, fee, plans and calculations to the appropriate Regional Office.
cc: ApplicantfWiRO//Central Files
qyry Office use on'
'
D E C E I V E
MAR 0 71996 D
PROJ p 5(,ut��1 tO31C

ATTACBAIENT A
LOW DENSITY AND SUBDIVISION PROJECTS
GENERAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. A completed stormwater permit application. ,
D E C E I V E
APR 2 51996 D
PROJ # �'U8� �/
2. Two sets of plans showing north arrow, scale, revision date, property/projecrboundaries, lot lines,
proposed and existing contours, 'drainage areas, mean high water line, wetlands, easements, the 30'
minimum vegetated buffer between impervious areas and surface waters, proposed impervious areas,
and road cross -sections.
3. Calculations of the built -upon area, For "subdivisions, please show the methodology for arriving at the
per lot built -upon area. For non -subdivision projects, please break down the calculation into buildings,
reads, parking, and'other (include.91 in areas).
4. 'Low density projects with curb and gutter will require:
a. Drainage area delineation and swale locations shown on the plans.
b. Detail of the swale, showing minimum 5:1 side slope.
C. Velocity calculations, indicating a non -erosive flow for the 10 yr storm.
d. Inlet and outlet elevations. Maximum longitudinal slope is 5%.
e. The type of vegetated cover specified on the plans.
DEED RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS
The following statements must be included for all low density projects, and for all subdivisions:
Fore, NU Me5E M L cr(S I T42u 2$
No more than 7934 square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the edge
of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures, including asphalt, gravel,
concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material, not including wood decking or the water surface of swimming
pools. This covenant is intended to. ensure continued compliance with the stormwaterpermit issued by the State
of North Carolina. The covenant may not be changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
No one may fill in or pipe any roadside or for -line swale, except as necessary to provide a minimum driveway'
crossing.
For curb and gutter projects, no one may pipe, fill in, or alter any lot line swale used to meet North Carolina
Stormwater Management Permit requirements.
NOTE If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listing each lot number, size,
and the allowable built -upon area for each lot.
/a�Dl �10»�2i �•t TIFE COMrno.) APe-A l8t7Lik-txl S7VL1411S UI�W Ltah(E
flNn l� exe,cs 1nrr IZOAV7 � _ B� Lln'1l�'e0 To O ,z3 /icy
O 1:M.PE�-U(aUS C.We?-NG1✓
i�S D F��urD flBDU1_J i1N�r) FU2(1}C�
rl(E ?-C_SL-UL T3Y 0wk-(-1L S�L `1rAl BD b
_'171Pt2U '(<,)s couLntAGE . T 1�Ll2ts 01�
•173

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda C. Sewall, Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 1996
TO: Doug Huggett
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: VictorD'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
AFF•: '
EDEHNFR
SUBJECT: Harker's Point Subdivision Wastewater System, DEH Project No. 95-17
On April 25, 1996, we received your letter requesting On -Site Wastewater Section comments
regarding the above -referenced project. We appreciate the opportunity to assist in your review of
this application and commend your efforts to coordinate the major CAMA permit application
review process with permitting processes of the other involved agencies.
Please find enclosed a copy of the Site Approval letter for this wastewater system issued by the
On -Site Wastewater Section for this project on May 13, 1996. This paves the way for the Carteret
County Health Department to issue an Improvement Permit which recognizes our acceptance of the
site's capacity to handle the specified amount of domestic wastewater from the facilities specified in
Phase I of this project. Please note that this approval is for the currently -proposed 28 four -bedroom
homes only and that separate approvals will be required prior to site approval for any expansion of
facilities that may be proposed in the future. Note also that engineered plans and specifications for
the wastewater system itself are still under review and must be approved by our office before the
Carteret County Health Department may issue an authorization -to -construct for any part of this
wastewater system, and which must also be issued prior to the construction of any of the proposed
facilities. Finally, please be aware that our review has been closely coordinated with other relevant
programs within the Department, including the Groundwater Section and Water Quality Section of
the Division of Environmental Management and the Shellfish Sanitation Branch of the
Environmental Health Services Section of the Division of Environmental Health, as well as the
Carteret County Health Department. Relevant letters of correspondence are also enclosed which
should further address the concerns outlined in your letter to us.
We hope that this satisfies your concerns regarding the referenced project. If yoCActlon
additional information regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone], fax number [phone], via the intemet at [e-mail] or at the address listed on this letterhead. $On -Site Wastewater Section FAX 919-71P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N �C An Equal Opportunity AffiryVoice 919-733-2895 50% recycled/10% pos

r
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
May 13, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: Bill Jeter, Section Chief
On -Site Wastewater Section
Division of Environmental Health
Through: Bob Cheek g-61
From: Brian Wootton yQ�il-
Subject: Harker's Point
Central System - Phase 1 - (Modification)
..Subsurface Wastewater Disposal System
Modification to comments written - Marcb`6, rl996
Carteret County
DEH #95-17/GW95096
(Victor D'Amato: Review Engineer)
These comments are submitted as supplements to our comments of March 6, 1996, which
were based on using the four (4) proposed drain fields to dispose of the proposed total waste volume
of 60,000 GPD. These comments s ecp ifically address the subject permit application (modification),
phase 1 to allow 14,720 GPD discharge from the two (2), northward septic drain fields. Additional
groundwater computer modeling (FLOTRANS) indicates that nitrate concentrations will appear at
the property boundary, (compliance boundary) using hypothetical concentrations of 15mg/ and 20
mg/1 at the waste source boundary. Therefore, we recommend the installation of three (3) new
monitor wells be installed, as located on the attached site map. If the permittee decides at a later time
to increase the daily flow rate from 14,720 GPD to 60,000 GPD using all four (4) proposed drain
fields, we suggest that denitrification treatment be added to the waste disposal system to reduce the
nitrate levels in the effluent to below 2L standards because nitrate levels may exceed 2L standards
at the property (compliance boundary) as indicated by nrevious computer modeling.
In conclusion, the Groundwater Section has no objection to the issuance of the permit,
provided that the following conditions are included:

r
1. Prior to beginning waste disposal operations, three (3) monitor wells , 1 upgradient
and 2 downgradient, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality. The monitor
wells shall be constructed such that the water level in the well is never above or below
the screened (open) portion of the well at any time during the year. The general
location and name for each well is marked on Attachment A. Each monitoring well
shall be constructed in accordance with this permit, and approved by the Wilmington
Regional Office.
2. The three (3) new monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3, shall be sampled every
March, July, and November for the following parameters:
NO3 Chloride
Ammonia Nitrogen TDS
TOC Water Level
pH
Fecal Coliforms
Volatile Organic Compounds - In November Only (by Method 1 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods For
The Examination of Water and Wastewateb 17th ed., 1989,
The measurement of water levels must be made prior to: sampling for the remaining
parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed
point on the top of the casing.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well.
4. If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/l• are detected in any downgradient
monitoring well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the
individual constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration
as measured in the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/l, this concentration will
be taken to represent the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances
of this naturally occurring TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be
subject to the additional sampling and analysis as described above.
5. If any volatile organic compounds are detected by method 6230D, then the
Wilmington Regional Office groundwater supervisor (phone number: 910-395-3900)
must be contacted immediately for further instructions regarding any additional
follow-up analyses required. The results of all initial and follow-up analyses must be
submitted simultaneously.

r
6. The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the Groundwater Section,
Permits and Compliance Unit, P.O. Box 29518 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0578 on Form
GW-59 [Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every April, August and December.
7. All wells that are constructed for purposes of groundwater monitoring shall be
constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0108 (Standards of Construction for
Wells Other than Water Supply) and any other state and local laws and regulations
pertaining to well construction.
8. The Wilmington Regional Office. telephone number [phone] shall be notified
at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the construction of any monitoring well so that
an inspection can be made of the monitoring well location. Such notification to the
regional groundwater supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours from
8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding state holidays.
9. Within sixty (60) days of completion of all monitoring wells, the permittee shall
submit two original copies of a scaled map (scale no greater than 1":100') signed and
sealed by a state licensed land surveyor that indicates all of the following information:
a. the location and identity of each monitoring well,
b. the location of all components of the waste disposal system,
C. the location of all property boundaries, ._ ..
d. the latitude and, longitude of the established horizontal control monument
e. the relative elevation of the top of the well casing (which shall known as the
"measuring point"), and
f. the depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point is established.
This survey shall be conducted using approved practices outlined in North Carolina
General Statutes Chapter 89C and the North Carolina Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 56. The surveyor shall establish a horizontal control monument on the
property of the waste disposal system and determine the latitude and longitude of this
horizontal control monument to a horizontal positional accuracy of+/-10 feet. All
other features listed in a. through e. above shall be surveyed relative to this horizontal
control monument. The positional accuracy of features listed in a. through e. above
shall have a ratio of precision not to exceed an error of closure of 1 foot per 10,000
feet of perimeter of the survey. Any features located by the radial method will be
located from a minimum of two points. Horizontal control monuments shall be
installed in such a manner and made of such materials that the monument will not be
destroyed due to activities that may take place on the property. The map shall also
be surveyed using the North American Datum of 1983 coordinate system and shall
indicate the datum on the map. All bearings or azimuths shall be based on either the
true or NAD 83 grid meridian. If a Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to

AWACHMENT A
Z
�DF
ump-q TOPOGRAP111C 43U•RVEY
qA 0 G 12J I
GAD I
,
:
;, Q X10 !t•
-
o
qry(om
.
oit S., 05.
7f) i,I:?, 1:ul133 I
tit�E!
•to
.... ...
lz*j:
IKW-2
!P
MW-1
•
Zj,.
. . . . . . . . .. . P It
r
i : I
I . .,?r%n=-'.
p I , Lm
V- pf;;� 7'.
-rmm - - :
�ate
......... ... ..
A lrV1
+
R I
IV
W It
—.7
P;I
0
LM
It 4
.8.) Q AIT.-
•P
M.0 P
I . I . . I . . . . .
.......
IT.....
1W -.1
01
4
Ilk
r I
-V
pot.
1z.
jut; Iso
t
4t I
N 1-4 JD
Ig
G
V--V.
QMcl"
P]u I. ....
-k
It
.0
Ia
I'v
N
t7-O A'
I
Ro,
IC IVAr•=
q
6-16
ti
;PROPOSED"
0 2
POR T
LANT, Wj 11
s
11AIM:E 1z tS I)OI&T
DE 1-1. NO. 9154 7
. I k
CARTEi IZEI T COUNTY
SCALE: p
''IZOPOSED MONITOR IZ WEILL LOCATIONS
..j

determine the latitude and longitude of the horizontal control monument, a GPS
receiver that has the capability to perform differential GPS shall be used and all data
collected by the GPS receiver will be differentially corrected.
The maps and any supporting documentation shall be sent to the Groundwater
Section, N.C. Division of Environmental Management P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, N.C.
27626-0578.
10. Upon completion of all well construction activities, a certification must be received
from a professional engineer certifying that the monitoring wells are located and
constructed in accordance with the Well Construction Standards (15A NCAC 2C)
and this permit. This certification should be submitted with copies of the Well
Completion Form (GW-1) for each well. Mail this certification and the associated
GW-1 forms to the Permits and Compliance Unit, Groundwater Section, P.O. Box
29578 Raleigh, NC, 27626-0578.
11. For the initial sampling of the well as specified elsewhere in the permit, the permittee
shall submit a copy of the GW-1 Form (Well Completion Form) with the Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59) for that well. Compliance Monitoring Forms that do not
include copies of the GW-1 form will be returned to the permittee without being
processed. Failure to submit these forms as required by this permit may result in the
initiation of enforcement activities pursuant to NC General Statutes 143-215.6.
12. The monitor wells must have identification plates and locks securing the wells against
unauthorized access and use (15 A NCAC 2C .0108).
13. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations
in 15A NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance
Boundary for the disposal system is established at the property boundary. An
exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action in addition to the penalty
provisions applicable under General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around
the disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of
the waste disposal area. Any exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall
require remediation action on the part of the permittee.
14. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division,
shall be provided.
cc: Charles Stehman
Permit Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Alia
Division of Environmental Health James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1:3 E H N FR
Linda C. Sewall, Director
May 13, 1996 .
Mr. Roger Melville
Environmental Health Supervisor
Carteret County Environmental Health
Courthouse Square
Administration Building
Beaufort, NC 28516
Subject: Review and approval of revised site plans and supporting information for Harker's Point
Subdivision Phase I wastewater treatment and disposal site, SR 1335, Harker's Island,
Carteret County, NC, Project No. 95-17
Dear Mr. Melville:
We have reviewed revised supporting documents for the above -referenced project, received May 10 and
13, 1996. One change (the two active fields shall be fields #3 and 4 which are farthest from adjacent
property boundaries) was made to. the plan's with the concurrence of the design engineer by phone on
May 13, 1996. It appears that all of our previous technical comments have been adequately addressed
and reflected in the proposed revisions. .
Enclosed is one copy of the site layout and associated plans and specifications stamped "Approved by the
On -Site Wastewater Section, Division of Environmental Health, Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources." The improvement permit to be issued for this project must include the approved plans,
specifications, legal documents, the conditions listed below and any other conditions deemed appropriate by
the health department. Prior to the issuance of an authorization -to -construct permit for this project,
engineered plans and specifications for the wastewater system must be reviewed and approved by the
Division of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section.
Final comments received from the Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section,
revealed that their modeling using FLOTRANS indicates that nitrate levels in violation of 2L
standards will likely be present in the groundwater at the property boundary using the currently -
proposed site layout particularly considering the addition of fields #1 and 2 and the total proposed
design flow, if the treatment plant effluent nitrate concentrations exceed 15 mg/L. Therefore
expansion or addition of facilities or sewage service or use of fields 01 and 2 shall require either the
addition of pretreatment processes for denitriflcation incorporated into the system design, or other
-means acceptable to the On -Site Wastewater and Groundwater Sections of assuring compliance with
2L standards.
This approval is for the following facilities, design flow and system type:
Facilities: 28 individual four -bedroom single-family dwelling units.
e ign Flow: 13,440 gallons per day.
On -Site Wastewater Section SAW FAX [phone]
P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N` C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2895 �� 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 2
May 13, 1996
System Type: Low pressure pipe (design LTAR = 0.46 gallons per square foot per day) with tertiary
extended aeration package plant pretreatment.
The following conditions must be specified in the improvement permit to be issued for this project:
1. Engineered plans and specifications for the wastewater system (including monitoring well
details and locations, per Groundwater Section comments - see below) shall be reviewed
and approved by the Division of Environmental Health, On-Site.Wastewater Section prior
to issuance of a construction authorization for this project.
2. The wastewater system for this project shall include pretreatment system components, as
necessary, including minimum dual -train tertiary wastewater treatment system (we
strongly recommend utilizing a system capable of wastewater denitrification) with
disinfection and 5800 linear feet of low pressure pipe (LPP) laterals, per the layout shown
and maximum trench bottom depths and trench dimensions/details indicated on the
approved site plans.
3. In accordance with GS 130A-336, the proposed facility locations, wastewater system site
and locations, property lines, water supplies and surface waters shall remain as shown on
the approved site plans.
r `r
%4.. Site modifications, as indicated on the approved plans and site' preparation specrfcations,,
including site clearing and grading to the finished elevations showu`oh the plans shall lie
conducted prior to issuance of a construction authorization. for this project.
5. Approved legal documents must be properly executed before an operation permit can be .
issued for this wastewater system.
6. Prior to beginning waste disposal operations, three (3) monitor wells , 1 upgradient and.2
downgradient, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality. The monitor wells shall
be constructed such that the water level in the well is, never above or below the screened
(open) portion of the well at any time during the year. The general location and name for
each well is marked on Attachment A. Each monitoring well shall be constructed in
accordance with this permit, and approved by the Wilmington Regional Office.
The three (3) new monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3, shall be sampled every March,
July, and November for the following parameters:
NO3 Chloride
Ammonia Nitrogen TDS
TOC Water Level
pH
Fecal Coliforms
Volatile Organic Compounds - In November Only (by Method 1 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods For
The Examination of Water and Wastewater", 17th ed., 1989 .

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 3
May 13, 1996
8. The measurement of water levels must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on
the top of the casing.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well.
9. If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/I are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/l, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
10. If any volatile organic compounds are detected by method 6230D, then the Wilmington
Regional Office groundwater supervisor (phone number: 910-395-3900) must be contacted
immediately for further instructions regarding any additional follow-up analyses required.
The results of all initial and follow-up analyses must be submitted simultaneously.
11. The results of the.sampling and: analysis shall be sent to the Groundwater Section, Permits
and Compliance Unit, P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, . N.C.. 27626-0578 on Form GW-59
[Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every April, August and December.
12. All wells that are constructed for purposes of groundwater monitoring shall be constructed
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0108 (Standards of Construction for Wells Other than
Water Supply) and any other state and local laws and regulations pertaining to well
construction.
13. The Wilmington Regional Office, telephone number [phone] shall be notified at least
supervisor shall he made during the normal office hours from 8.00 a.m. until 5.00 p.m. on
Monday through Friday, excluding state holidays.
14. Within sixty (60) days of completion of all monitoring wells, the permittee shall submit two
original copies of a scaled map (scale no greater than VAN') signed and sealed by a state,
licensed land surveyor that indicates all of the following information:
a. the location and identity of each monitoring well,
b. the location of all components of the waste disposal system,
C. ' the location of all property boundaries,
d. the latitude and longitude of the established horizontal control monument
e. the relative elevation of the top of the well casing (which shall' known as the
"measuring point"), and
f. the depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point, is established.

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 4
May 13, 1996
This survey shall be conducted using approved practices outlined in North Carolina
General Statutes Chapter 89C and the North Carolina Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 56. The surveyor shall establish a horizontal control monument on the property of
the waste disposal system and determine the':latitude and longitude of this horizontal
control monument to a horizontal positional accuracy of+/-10 feet. All other features listed
in a. through e. above shall be surveyed relative to this horizontal control monument. The
positional accuracy of features listed in a. through e. above shall have a ratio of precision
not to exceed an error of closure of 1 foot per 10,000 feet of perimeter of the survey. Any
features located by the radial method will be located from a minimum of two points.
Horizontal control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and made of such
materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to activities that may take place on
the property. The map shall also be surveyed using the North American Datum of 1983
coordinate system and shall indicate the datum on the map. All bearings or azimuths shall
be based on either the true or NAD 83 grid meridian. If a Global Positioning System (GPS)
is used to determine the latitude and longitude of the horizontal control monument, a GPS
receiver that has the capability to perform differential GPS shall be used and all data
collected by the GPS receiver will be differentially corrected.
The maps and any supporting -documentation shall be sent to the Groundwater Section,
N.C. Division of Environmental Management P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0578.
15. Upon completion of all wellconstruction:, activities, a certification must be received from a '
professional engineer. certifying that the monitoring wells areq located and constructed in
accordance with the Well Construction Standards (15A NCAC 2C) and this permit. This
certification should be submitted with copies of the Well Completion Form (GW-1) for
each well. Mail this certification and the associated GW-1 forms to the Permits and
Compliance Unit, Groundwater Section, P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, NC, 27626-0578.
16. For the initial sampling of the well as specified elsewhere in the permit, the permittee shall
submit a copy of the GW-1 Form (Well Completion Form) with the Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59) for that well. Compliance Monitoring Forms that do not
include copies of the GW-1 form will be returned to the permittee without being processed.
Failure to submit these forms as required by this permit may result in the initiation of
enforcement activities pursuant to NC General Statutes 143-215.6.
17. The monitor wells must have identification plates and locks securing the wells against
unauthorized access and use (15 A NCAC 2C .0108).
18. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system is established at the property boundary. An exceedance of Groundwater
Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance Boundary, is subject to immediate
remediation action in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under General Statute
143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the
disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 5
May 13, 1996
disposal area. Any exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require
remediation action on the part of the permittee.
19. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
There are a. number of times during the preparation of this site when direct supervision by the health
department must be provided to insure that the site is prepared properly. For this project, make certain that:
• Site preparation, fill material and installation procedures and drainfield area grading are conducted in
strict accordance -with the approved plans and site preparation procedures. Fill material and site
preparation must be approved by the applicant's engineer/soils consultant and the local health
department prior to fill being placed on the site. Ensure that drainfield areas are graded to the
elevations shown on the detailed site plan and be present during the fill installation process to ensure
that acceptable fill material is installed properly in accordance.with the approved specifications.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions pertaining to this letter or if we may be of further
assistance with this project, including if any assistance is needed during your inspection of site
preparation steps. We may be reached at the address and phone and facsimile numbers listed on this
letter.
Sincerely,
Victor Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
cc: Ronald Cullipher
John Williams
Brian Wootton
Todd Miller

.State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
•Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
—��u—
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary � p�Y� N R
Linda C. Sewall, Director
May 13, 1996 �4
Mr. Roger Melville tj\9 �O`Q
Environmentai Health Supervisor p.`CL
Carteret County Environmental Health
Courthouse Square GOJ
Administration Building
Beaufort, NC 28516�
c
Subject: Review and approval of revised site plans and supporting information for Harker's Point
Subdivision Phase I wastewater treatment and disposal site, SR 1335, Harker's Island,
Carteret County, NC, Project No. 95-17
Dear Mr. Melville:
We have reviewed revised supporting documents for the above -referenced project, received May 10 and
13, 1996. One change (the two active fields shall be fields #3 and 4 which are farthest from adjacent
property boundaries) was made to the plans with the concurrence of the design engineer by phone on
May 13, 1996. It appears that all of our previous technical comments have been adequately addressed
and reflected in the proposed revisions.
Enclosed is one copy of the site layout and associated plans and specifications stamped "Approved by the
on -Site Wastewater Section, Division of Environmental Health, Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources." The improvement permit to be issued for this project must include the approved plans,
specifications, legal documents, the conditions listed below and any other conditions deemed appropriate by
the health department. Prior to the issuance of an authorization -to -construct permit for this project,
engineered plans and specifications for the wastewater system must be reviewed and approved by the
Division of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section.
Final comments received from the Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section,
revealed that their modeling using FLOTRANS indicates that nitrate levels in violation of 2L
standards will likely be present in the groundwater at the property boundary using the currently -
proposed site layout particularly considering the addition of fields #1 and 2 and the total proposed
design flow, if the treatment plant effluent nitrate concentrations exceed 15 mg/L. Therefore
expansion or addition of facilities or sewage service or use of fields #1 and 2 shall require either the
addition of pretreatment processes for denitriflcation incorporated into the system design, or other
means acceptable to the On -Site Wastewater and Groundwater Sections of assuring compliance with
2L standards.
This approval is for the following facilities, design flow and system type:
Facilities: 28 individual four -bedroom single-family dwelling units.
Design Flow: 13,440 gallons per day.
On -Site Wastewater Section �'� FAX [phone]
P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nor��C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2895 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

'Mr. Roger Melville
Page 2
May 13, 1996
System TWe: Low pressure pipe (design LTAR = 0.46 gallons per square foot per day) with tertiary
extended aeration package plant pretreatment..
The following conditions must be specified in the improvement permit to be issued for this project:
1. Engineered plans and specifications for the wastewater system (including monitoring well
details and locations, per Groundwater Section comments - see below) shall be reviewed
and approved by the Division of Environmental Health, On -Site Wastewater Section prior
to issuance of a construction authorization for this project.
2. The wastewater system for this project shall include pretreatment system components, as
necessary, including minimum dual -train tertiary wastewater treatment system (we
strongly recommend utilizing a system capable of wastewater denitrification) with
disinfection and 5800 linear feet of low pressure pipe (LPP) laterals, per the layout shown
and maximum trench bottom depths and trench dimensions/details indicated on the
approved site plans.
3. In accordance with GS 130A-336, the proposed facility locations, wastewater system site
and locations, property lines, water supplies and surface waters shall remain as shown on
the approved site plans.
4. Site modifications, as indicated on the approved plans and site preparation specifications,
including site clearing and grading to the finished elevations shown on the plans shall be
conducted prior to issuance of a construction authorization for this project.
5. Approved legal documents must be properly executed before an operation permit can be
issued for this wastewater system.
6. Prior to beginning waste disposal operations, three (3) monitor wells , 1 upgradient and 2
downgradient, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality. The monitor wells shall
be constructed such that the water level in the well is never above or below the screened
(open) portion of the well at any time during the year. The general location and name for
each well is marked on Attachment A. Each monitoring well shall be constructed in
accordance with this permit, and approved by the Wilmington Regional Office.
7. The three (3) new monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3, shall be sampled every March,
July, and November for the following parameters:
NO3 Chloride
Ammonia Nitrogen TDS
TOC Water Level
PH
Fecal Coliforms
Volatile Organic Compounds- In November Only (by Method 1 below)
Method 1: Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard Methods For
The Examination of Water and Wastewater", 17th ed., 1989 .

'Mr. Roger Melville
Page 3
May 13, 1996
8. The measurement of water levels must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on
the top.of the casing.
The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to
provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well.
9. If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mgft are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mgtl, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the dowagradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
10. If any volatile organic compounds are detected by method 6230D, then the Wilmington
Regional Office groundwater supervisor (phone number: 910-395-3900) must be contacted
immediately for further instructions regarding any additional follow-up analyses required.
The results of all initial and follow-up analyses must be submitted simultaneously.
11. The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the Groundwater Section, Permits
and Compliance Unit, P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0578 on Form GW-59
[Compliance. Monitoring Report Form] every April, August and December.
12. All wells that are constructed for purposes of groundwater monitoring shall be constructed
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0108 (Standards of Construction for Wells Other than
Water Supply) and any other state and local laws and regulations pertaining to well
construction.
13. The WilmingiQn Regional Office telephone number [phone] shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours prior to the construction of any monitoring well so that an inspection
can be made of the monitoring well location_ Such notification to the regional groundwater
supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 P.m. on
Monday through Friday, excluding state bolidays
14. Within sixty (60) days of completion of all monitoring wells, the permittee shall submit two
original copies of a scaled map (scale no greater than 111:1001) signed and sealed by a state
licensed land surveyor that indicates all of the following information:
a. the location and identity of each monitoring well,
b. the location of all components of the waste disposal system,
C. the location of all property boundaries,
d. the latitude and longitude of the established horizontal control monument
e. the relative elevation of the 'top of the well casing (which shall known as the
"measuring point'), and
f. the depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point is established.

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 4
May 13, 1996
This survey shall be conducted using approved practices outlined in North Carolina
General Statutes Chapter 89C and the North Carolina Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 56. The surveyor shall establish a horizontal control monument on the property of
the waste disposal system and determine the latitude and longitude of this horizontal
control monument to a horizontal positional accuracy of+/-10 feet. All other features listed
in a. through e. above shall be surveyed relative to this horizontal control monument. The
positional accuracy of features listed in a. through e. above shall have a ratio of precision
not to exceed an error of closure of 1 foot per 10,000 feet of perimeter of the survey. Any
features locatedby the radial method will be located from a minimum of two points.
Horizontal control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and made of such
materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to activities that may take place on
the property. The map shall also be surveyed using the North American Datum of 1983
coordinate system and shall indicate the datum on the map. All bearings or azimuths shall
be based on either the true or NAD 83 grid meridian. If a Global Positioning System (GPS)
is used to determine the latitude and longitude of the horizontal control monument, a GPS
receiver that has the capability to perform differential GPS shall be used and all data
collected by the GPS receiver will be differentially corrected.
The maps and any supporting documentation shall be sent to the Groundwater Section,
N.C. Division of Environmental Management P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0578.
15. Upon completion of all well construction activities, a certification must be received from a
professional engineer certifying that the monitoring wells are located and constructed in
accordance with the Well Construction Standards (15A NCAC 2C) and this permit. This
certification should be submitted with copies of the Well Completion Form (GW-1) for
each well. Mail this certification and the associated GW-1 forms to the Permits and
Compliance Unit, Groundwater Section, P.O. Box 29578 Raleigh, NC, 27626-0578.
16. For the initial sampling of the well as specified elsewhere in the permit, the permittee shall
submit a copy of the GW-1 Form (Well Completion Form) with the Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59) for that well. Compliance Monitoring Forms that do not
include copies of the GW-1 form will be returned to the permittee without being processed.
Failure to submit these forms as required by this permit may result in the initiation of
enforcement activities pursuant to NC General Statutes 143-215.6.
17. The monitor wells must have identification plates and locks securing the wells against
unauthorized access and use (15 A NCAC '2C .0108).
18. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system is established at the properly boundary. An exceedance of Groundwater
Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate
remediation action in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under General Statute
143-215.6A(a)(1).
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the
disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste

'Mr. Roger Melville
Page 5
May 13, 1996
disposal area. Any eaceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require
remediation action on the part of the permittee.
19. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
There are a number of times during the preparation of this site when direct supervision by the health
department must be provided to insure that the site is prepared properly. For this project, make certain that:
Site preparation, fill material and installation procedures and drainfield area grading are conducted in
strict accordance with the approved plans and site preparation procedures. Fill material and site
preparation must be approved by the applicant's engineer/soils consultant and the local health
department prior to fill being placed on the site. Ensure that drainfield areas are graded to the
elevations shown on the detailed site plan and be present during the fill installation process to ensure
that acceptable fill material is installed properly in accordance with the approved specifications.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions pertaining to this letter or if we may be of further
assistance with this project, including if any assistance is needed during your inspection of site
preparation steps. We may be reached at the address and phone and facsimile numbers listed on this
letter.
Sincerely,
Q.,&I;-f0v-c P
Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
cc: Ronald Cullipher
John Williams
Brian Wootton
Todd Miller

` State of North Carolina
CDepartment of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda C. Sewall, Director
Mr. Roger Melville
Environmental Health Supervisor
Carteret County Environmental Health
Courthouse Square
Administration Building
Beaufort, NC 28516
Ala
FA
�
[DEHNFR
April 24, 1996
rp ,
CA(;iE 4:1 COLiiT\ .;, Z`r19_,
Subject: Review of revised supporting information for Harker's Point wastewater
treatment and disposal site, SR 1335, Harker's Island, Carteret County, NC,
Project No. 95-17
Dear Mr. Melville:
We have reviewed revised supporting documents for the above -referenced project, received
April 15, 1996.
The following comments must be adequately addressed with revisions resubmitted for further
review before the proposed site plan and layout for this system can be approved and an
improvement permit issued.
1. Site plan: Ten-year "still water" flood elevations have been determined by FEMA for
many coastal areas in North Carolina. It is likely that such a ten-year'flood elevation
has also been determined for this area; since it is residential. Vie suggest that the
design consultants refer to the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (different than a standard
flood insurance map) for Harker's Island, if available, and provide the ten-year
elevations, as requested.
Note that the forcemain shown to be within 50 feet of the SA waters shown on the
plans will need to be constructed of ductile iron pipe with mechanical fittings.
2. Soil/site work: Based on discussions with S&ME, the firm sub -contracted to perform
the pump testing for this site, it was confirmed that their recommendations to use the
Neuman's Method Analysis conductivity of 0.00645 cm/see were not in error, as
indicated in the response to our April 3, 1996 review letter from Land Management
Group, who conducted the mounding analysis. In fact, the S&ME report clearly
discusses using site -averaged results, not method -averaged results, as were used in the
Land Management Group mounding analysis.
On -Site Wastewater Section �I%. FAX [phone]
P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2895 50% recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

. Mr. Roger Melville
Page 2
,OOO
April 24, 1996
3. Legal documentation: We have the following comments regarding the proposed legal
documents provided:
• Item 12.A of the restrictive covenants must be revised to establish clear legal access
to each individual grinder pump station.
• Item 14 of the restrictive covenants appears to suggest that the developer intends to
act as a public utility, as it includes language regarding hook-up fees, etc. If this is
the case, then the developer must provide appropriate legal documentation
establishing the formation of the utility and revise the other legal documents
accordingly. If not, the language in the restrictive covenants must be revised to not
include the aforementioned language.
• Item 4 (on page 3) of the tri-party agreement does not appear to have been addressed
in the Association by-laws, as indicated.
Please provide relevant documentation regarding the CAMA permit for forcemain
installation in the AEC.
We shall continue our review as soon as we receive the revisions and additional information
requested above. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions pertaining to this
letter or if we may be of further assistance with this project. We may be reached at the address
and phone and facsimile numbers listed on this letter or I may be contacted directly by phone
at [phone] or using electronic mail via the internet at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
0iVA-0 ?t5�w'
Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
cc: Ronald Cullipher
John Williams
Larry Baldwin

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
April23, 1996
MEMO TO: Victor D'Amato
N.C. Division of Environmental Health
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
FROM: Doug HuggettN'ylw�
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
ANwvAF
IDEHNR
RE: Major CAMA Permit Application, Harkers Point Subdivision, Harkers
Island, Carteret County.
Enclosed please find a copy of a March 18, 1996 correspondence from Mr. Todd Miller of
the N.C. Coastal Federation, in which concerns on the above referenced project were stated. As
part of our coordinated environmental review process, the Division of Coastal Management is in
the process of investigating several of the assertions made in Mr. Millers letter.
It is my understanding that your agency is in the process of reviewing the plans for the
proposed wastewater treatment plant. In that your agency has particular expertise in this area, the
Division would like to request that you provide a response to item number 2 of Mr. Millers letter.
Any additional information on the project that you feel is important, especially with regards to
current and future capacities of the plant, would also be welcomed.
Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you should have any additional
comments on this project, please feel free to contact me at [phone] (fax [phone]).
P.O. Box 27687, I� %�C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 1 e
Voice 919-733-2293
FAX [phone] ,
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50%recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4
Division of Coastal Management
r� ��
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N IR
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
April23, 1996
MEMO TO: W.W. Burgess
Director
Carteret County Health department
FROM: Doug Huggett�
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
RE: Major CAMA Permit Application, Harkers Point Subdivision, Harkers
Island, Carteret County.
Enclosed please find a copy of a March 18, 1996 correspondence from Mr. Todd Miller of
the N.C. Coastal Federation, in which concerns on the above referenced project were stated. As
part of our coordinated environmental review process, the Division of Coastal Management is in
the process of investigating several of the assertions made in Mr. Millers letter.
It is my understanding that your agency is in the process of reviewing the plans for the
proposed wastewater treatment plant. In that your agency has particular expertise in this area, the
Division would like to request that you provide a response to item number 2 of Mr. Millers letter.
Any additional information on the project that you feel is important, especially with regards to
current and future capacities of the plant, would also be welcomed.
Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you should have any additional
comments on this project, please feel free to contact me at [phone] (fax [phone]).
P.O. Box27687, I��AW FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 1 dCAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 ., 50%recycled/100/ post -consumer paper

April 19, 1996
Mr. R.L. Moore
c/o Harris and Associates
105 West Nash Street
Wilson, NC 27858
Dear Sirs;
This letter is in response to your application request under the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) to develop the proposed 28 lot Harkers Point subdivision adjacent to the Harkers
Island bridge in Carteret County. The application was received by the Division's Morehead City
office on February 8, 1996, at which time a coordinated state and federal review of the proposed
project was initiated. However, it has been determined that additional information will be
required before taking final action on your application request. The required information is
summarized below;
1) Plans for any additional development of the subdivision which were not indicated in the
CAMA permit application must be submitted to this office. The current permit
application indicates that 28 lots are proposed for the subdivision. However, information
has been received indicating that at least 41 subdivision lots are proposed. Please provide
information that will clarify this inconsistency. It is also requested that information on any
future plans for this or other developments in the area that intend to utilize the proposed
waste water treatment plant be provided to this office.
2) Detailed information on the waste water treatment plant must be provided to this office.
This information should include treatment plant location, specifications, level of treatment,
capacity, and any other information pertaining to the treatment plant. Additionally, the
appropriate state and/or local authorizations for the waste water plant must be obtained
and provided to this office prior to the Division taking final action on your application.
3) A stormwater management plan must be approved by the Division of Environmental
Management and a copy of this approval certification provided to this office prior to the
Division taking final action on your application.
4) An executed agreement with the Department of Transportation allowing the sewer line to
be located within NCDOT right of way must be provided to this office prior to the
Division taking final action on your application.

In accordance with T15A:0710204(d), which states that processing of an application may
be placed on hold if additional information from the applicant is necessary to adequately assess the
project, processing of your application must be terminated until such time as the information
requested is provided to this office. As required by T15A:07J.0204(d), during the pendency of
any termination of processing, the permit processing period will not run. Following receipt of the
requested information, processing will begin at the point where it was terminated.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (919)
733-2293, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Sincerely,
Doug Huggett
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
cc: Charles Jones, DCM-Morehead City

Hr'K-17-I V 7U ✓Uv • 1J rKUM ULM WH I tK UUHL 1 I Y I UI`I I U
97153227 P.01/01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 10, 1996
1� TWA
1 FR.
To: William Teter, Chief
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
Division of Environmental Health
From Steve W. Tedder, Chief Sssnad Dv
Water Quality Section Avg W.
Subject: OSWS Project No. 95-17
Harker's Point Wastewater System
Harker's Island
Carteret County
Staff of the Water Quality Section have reviewed the subject project with respect to
concerns about potential adverse impacts to adjacent surface waters.
The proposed project's wastewater treatment and disposal system is a tertiary system that
should afford a high quality effluent. Although the effluent will not be denitrified, the
nitrate levels should not pose any adverse effect on surface water quality. Discussions with
the DEM's Groundwater staff indicate that the modeling runs conducted show that the
travel time to reach the nearest surface waters would be several months to approximately a
year based upon the site characteristics. It is also their opinion that the nitrate levels would
be dissipated or attenuated due to the movement of the effluent through the subsurface
soils, the dilution and dispersion in the groundwater, and the dilution and dispersion in the.
surface waters. Based upon these discussions and opinions, we do not object to the
proposed project.
We appreciate the opportunity to review the subject project. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Don Safrit, P.E., Assistant Chief for Technical
Support at [phone], extension 519.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
• Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled! 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Roger Melville
Environmental Health Supervisor
Carteret County Environmental Health
Courthouse Square
Administration Building
Beaufort, NC 28516
L
[DEHNFR
April 3, 1996
SSW
CAR�E�� COUrli1 HLp,.Zil DW"Z.
Subject: Review of supporting information for Harker's Point wastewater treatment and
disposal site, SR 1335, Harker's Island, Carteret County, NC, Project No. 95-17
Dear Mr. Melville:
We have reviewed supporting documents for the above -referenced project, received March 1,
1995 and January 31, 1996. It is our understanding, per the letter from the design engineer
which we received April 2, 1996, that the proposal calls for the subsurface application of
tertiary -treated effluent generated by a new subdivision with 28 four -bedroom homes (note that
there has been some indication that additional facilities, which have not yet been identified, are
planned for future development; for clarity, we will refer to this 28 lot proposal as "Phase I").
The wastewater is proposed to be pre-treated using package tertiary treatment plant units which
include chlorine disinfection; the wastewater system plans show that three 20,000 gallon per
day treatment plant units are to be provided.- Tertiary -treated effluent is proposed to be applied
using four 14,500 square foot low pressure pipe (LPP) drainfields; the phasing schedule on the
plans indicates that two of these fields are proposed for Phase.I installation. The design flow
for the proposed facilities is 13,440 gallons per day.
Per the request of the design engineer in his letter which we received April 3, 1996, we are
treating this as a review of the site plan and system layout only. Engineering plans and
specifications will need to be separately reviewed and approved by our office prior to the
issuance of a construction authorization for this system. Before we can approve the proposed
site plan and layout for this system the following comments. must be adequately addressed and
revisions resubmitted for further review.
1. Phasing schedule: The phasing schedule on the plans indicates that two 14,500-square
foot drainfields will be installed to serve the proposed new facilities (Phase I). We
concur with this approach since dual alternating drainfields will be provided, as
required, and the resulting long term application rate will be relatively conservative
considering that the effluent to be applied shall be tertiary -treated. If phasing the
On -Site Wastewater Section
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% posbconsumer paper

Mr. Roger Melville
Page 2
April 3, 1996
installation of the package treatment plant units is also proposed, the phasing schedule
must clearly indicate how the installation shall be phased, including how many
treatment plant units shall be initially installed, how flow splitting/equalization shall be
achieved and how the system shall be operated to ensure that treatment plant efficiency
is maximized.
2. Site 1 : The ten-year flood elevation in this area must be indicated. All stormwater
provisions must be shown and all designated wetlands on the site must be delineated on
the plans. Note that the forcemain may not be installed in areas which are designated
wetlands.
The site plan must be revised to include the currently -proposed Phase I work, which
would appear to include development of 28 lots, as indicated (41 lots are shown on the
current site plan), and the system components currently proposed for installation. The
drainfield site plan must be revised or amended to clearly indicate the locations of
adjacent surface waters.
The plant washdown well must be shown to meet the required minimum setback
distance (100 feet) from the closest drainfield. Since this system would be classified as
a "fill system", the setback distances must be measured from five feet from the edge of
the nearest nitrification trench.
3. Soil/site work: Based on the soil/site information provided which includes extensive
soil characterization by the local health department and soil/site consultant, field -
measured saturated hydraulic conductivity estimates of the surficial soil horizons and
pump test results for the site, it appears that the site is hydraulically capable of handling
the currently -proposed design effluent flow. We have the following questions about
the 60,000 gallon per day groundwater mounding analysis by Land Management
Group, the applicant's, site consultant (these items would need to be addressed as
expansion of service/flow is proposed):
• What is the justification for using a saturated hydraulic conductivity of 31 "ft/day in
the model? Per the report from S&ME, the applicant's hydrologic consultant, it
appears that a conductivity of about 18.3 ft/day would be appropriate.
• What is the justification for using a loading rate of 0.833 gallons per day per square
foot in the model? Per the plans for this project, it appears that a loading rate of 1.03
gallons per day per square foot would be appropriate.
Based on the pump test results provided,•the estimated seasonal high mounded water
table gradient (which is based on a 60,000 gallon per day effluent application to the
site) and the approximate distance to the nearest surface water, it appears that the
"travel time" for the applied effluent will be greater than two years, which should be
ample'time for tertiary treated effluent to be finally treated prior to reaching adjacent
surface waters. Based on comments provided by the Groundwater Section of the

r ° Mr. Roger Melville
/ Page 3
April 3, 1996
Division of Environmental Management (DEM), four groundwater monitoring wells
and periodic monitoring well sampling shall be required (this requirement will be more
clearly defined if and when the site is approved). We have not yet received comments
from the Water Quality Section of DEM which have also been requested. Note that
additional items may be required of the applicant following our receipt of DEM
comments.
Drainfields must be staked out on the site per the proposed layouts shown on the site
plan and the field -staked layout must be reviewed and approved by the local health
department prior to site approval.
4. Leaal documentation: Draft legal documents for the easements needed to route the
proposed forcemain through the Carteret County Harbor of Refuge property and the
state road right-of-way must be provided. Additionally, assurance that the execution of
the Harbor of Refuge easement shall be formally approved must be provided (it appears
that this would include some sort of agreement between the Harker's Point Preservation
Committee and the applicant, per the April 26, 1995 letter from the Carteret County
Manager).
We shall continue our review as soon as we receive the revisions and additional information
requested above. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions pertaining to this
letter or if we may be of further assistance with this project. We may be reached at the address
and phone and facsimile numbers listed on this letter or I may be contacted directly by phone
at [phone] or using electronic mail via the internet at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Victor D'Amato
Environmental Engineer
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
cc: Ronald Cullipher
John Williams
Brian Wootton
Todd Miller
Larry Baldwin

NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF'TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P. 0. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
March 8, 1996 .
COUNTY: Carteret (16-96-05)
SUBJECT: Encroachment Contract - HTB Associates, LLC
Mr. Clyde P. Harris
President
HTB Associates, LLC
2105 West Nast Street
Wilson, N.C. 27893 '
Attached hereto, for your files, is a copy of the Right of Way Encroachment
Contract which has been properly executed. This contract covers the following:
Installation of approximately 2,220 L.F. of 4" PVC sanitary sewer force main
along SR 1335 in Carteret County as shown on the attached plans.
APPROVED SUBJECT TO:
(1) Notify the District Engineer's Office in New Bern [phone] prior
to beginning and upon completion of work.
(2) Workmanship and materials to conform to D.O.T. standards and
. specifications: Use of Class 200 minimum strength PVC pipe required.
(3) Contact the appropriate Utility Company(ies) involved and make
satisfactory arrangements to adjust the utilities in conflict with the
proposed work prior to construction.
(4) Any pavement or drainage structure disturbed or damaged shall be
restored to its original condition as directed by the District Engineer.
(5) = Traffic Control Devices shall be in accordance with the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and amendments or supplements
thereto. Proper traffic control devices, signs, etc. shall be installed to
insure public safety.

Page -2-
Mr. Clyde P. Harris - President
HTB Associates, LLC
March 8, 1996
(6) Trenching, bore pits, and/or other excavations shall not be left open or
unsafe overnight.
(7) Fill areas/backfill material to be thoroughly compacted to 95% original
density. All trenched material shall be compacted in maximum 6"
layers by mechanical tamp or other previously approved method of
compaction. Any material removed from the trench/pit that is
contaminated or unsuitable for backfill shall be disposed of off DOT
right of way.
(8) Dress, seed and mulch all disturbed areas. This operation to be
performed on a weekly basis.
(9) Proper temporary and permanent measures shall be used to control
erosion and sedimentation in accordance with all local, State and
Federal regulations.
(10) When surface areas in excess of one acre will be disturbed, the
Encroaching Party shall submit to the District Engineer a Sediment and
Erosion Control Plan which has been approved by the appropriate
regulatory agency or authority prior to beginning any work on the Right
of Way. Failure to provide this information shall be grounds for
suspension of operations.
(11) It shall be the responsibility of the encroaching party to remove all
temporary erosion control measures once a satisfactory vegetative
cover has been established.
(12) All roadway signs are to be replaced before the end of the same work
day.
(13) Permission from owners of property crossed by this installation is
required. (See attached letter from Carteret County.)

Page -3-
Mr. Clyde P. Harris - President
HTB Associates, LLC
March 8, 1996
(14) Sewer mains within the State right of way shall be installed per
attachments #1 and #2 entitled Special Provisions - Untrenched
Construction.
(15) Remain 3 foot minimum or 1 foot distance per 1 foot depth from edge of
pavement whichever is greater for shoulder installations.
(16) Strict compliance with the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating
Utilities on Highway Rights of Way Manual shall be required.
(17) Where pipelines are installed in the right of way and are not of ferrous
material, a locating tape shall be installed with the pipeline.
(18) In cases where less than minimum bury is necessary or where bores
are greater than 6", the pipe shall be protected with a casing.
(19) The Department of Transportation does not guarantee the right of way
on these roads, nor will it be responsible for any claim for damages
brought by any property owner by reason of the installation.
Sincerely,
G. R. Shirley, Jr., P.E.
DIVISION ENGINEER
GRS,jr:WCR
Attachment
cc: Mr. J. B. Williamson, Jr., Manager of Right of Way
Mr. A. C. Everett, District Engineer
File

SPECIAL PROVISIONS :ill
Untrenched Construction
Under no conditions shall jetting or wet boring, with water, of utility pipelines
or encasements under pavements be allowed.
Boring and Jackfng . ,_
Smooth wall or spiral weld steel pipe may be Jacked :through dry bores slightly
larger than the pipe bored progressively ahead of the leading edge of tine advancing
Pipe as spoil is mucked by the auger back through the pipe. As tare dry boring
operation progresses, each new section.of the encasement pi a shall be butt -welded•
to the section previously jacked into place. Encasements shall extend from ditch
line to ditch line in cut•sections, 5',beyond the toe of slopes in -fill sections,
and 3' behind curb sections.
If voids are encountered or occur outside the encasement pipe, grout holes shall be' -
installed in tine top section of the encasement pipe at 10 foot centers and the
voids filled with 1:3.Portland cement grout at sufficient pressure to prevent
settlement in fire roadway.
In tile event an obstruction is encountered during the boring and jacking operation
the auger is to be withdrawn and the excess pipe is to be cut off, capped, and
filled with 1:3 Portland cement grout at sufficient pressure to fill all voids
before moving to another boring site.
Size and wall thickness of smooth wall or spiral welded encasement Pipe for boring
and jacking is as follows:
Pipe Sizes.(O.D,) Wall Thickness
4 to 12-3/4" 188
161.
181, .250
20" .250
24-1 250
30„ .250
3611 .312
48" .375 ,
.500
Materials, joints, protective coating, grouting, wall thickness of carrier pipe,
welds, and cathodic protection shall be in accordance with applicable irrdustry.or
governmental codes,`as well as the specification of the Department of Transportation.
Casing pipe shall be sealed at the ends to prevent flowing water and debris from
entering the annular space between the casing -;and the carrier.
The grade of lire top of the pipe or casing within rights -of -way should provide
minimum bury as follows: 4,
A. Longitudinal Installations....... 3'
8. Crossings :Under Roadways..........: ,,3' (Below Travel Surface)
C. Crossings Under Ditches (Paved d Unpaved) .... 2'
Pipelines carrying flammable, corrosive, expansive, energized or unstable transmittants
must comply with State,"Federal and Utility Codes. in no case, shall the depth of
bury be less than as indicated above.

'r -5" BEYOND TOE
OF FILL SLOPE
.
-S BEYOND TOE OF
FILL SLOPE
DITC„
C
L �
DITCH
f

\1'
NORTH RIVER
BRIGGS
N/F MOORE
FUTURE DEVELOPMEN -
raarrm
•.mr.>s
�tsr
rAmar
/335
N/F
16
17
1s
18
BROOKS CREEK: 11
19 lJ
21
� ss
h 30
3
a. 9
x n
n
I
n
>e
F s
e
�/
Ll pRvmsen
t-P10
Pa. J
/
Fo{tGH 4" PVC FORCE
MAIN
,
mH I I0 SDR 21
Q
}
�1uc aoAcy},Y��
N/F
CARTERET CO.
e 1
JtJ
HARBOR OF REFUGE BARKERS 4%-Ak 1CCF
y
(PROPOSED) �H� MIS
500' 250' 0
500,
1000, HARKES ISL•A'JND BRIDGE
SCALE: 1" -
500'
PROJECT •: PM707
NOTE:
1.)THIS SHEET PROVIDED TO FAMILAR REVIEW PERSONEL
WITH LOCATION OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH ADJOINING
CHARACTERMICS. THIS INFORMATION WAS SCANN OV
AERIAL TAX PARCEL MAP AND IS NOT AN AS I{�
OF ADJOINING PARCELS. %%` Q �.•�
3R9 _��s_•:�FF%
STRAITS
NCDOT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT REQUEST
H� '&D%KvjL:,'JLD%.S ip®liN JL
:k SEAL. .:
S
— 13343
., <D D. CVO'.•`,
11j111nn1100
HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS
DESIGNED:
1
DDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
DRAWN
WILSON. N.C. 27858
Div�
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
R 0 j
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
DATE:
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557
8/10/95'r
19 -7
�
SCALE:
"= 500'1
ONALD D. CULL HER . P
1

'NCSR 1335
HARKLRS ISLAND ROAD
5. 00 1.0. 00 '95 10 00 1 5. 00
1 0. 00 1, iz 'w
3 I¢ la
10- ¢ la
ix Iw
I
w iw Iw
I
I , I
MEAN MARSH
HIGH
WATER
N CARP
•OVol
:a SEAL i
13343 s
Q ••i
D.
PROJECT •:PM707
ROAD SECTION
SCALE: 1"=10'
DETAIL SHEET
ENCROACHMENT REQUEST
]EL F POINT
HARKERS ISLAND, CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH
CAROLINA
CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS .
DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET
RDC
WILSON. N.C. 27858
DRAWN:
DJV
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
/ STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
RDC
�9. HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102
DATE:
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 ,
2/20/96
SCALE:
0 1 D. CUELIPHER, E.
AS SHOWN

Carierei Cou. , /i government
BomVafammissionem
Opal D. Hill, Chairman
Carol C. Long, V. Chairman
Bettie H. Bell
Rim Bennett
David E. Yeomans
April 26, 1995
Mr. Richard L. Stanley
Bryant & Stanley
`P.O. Box 150
Beaufort, NC 28516
Re: Proposed Sewer Line for R.L. Moore Subdivision
Harkers Island
Dear'Mr. Stanley:
Gary L. Page
Coanlym"O er
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
During a recent meeting .of 'the Carteret' County Board of
Commissioners, Mr. Moore's request to secure an easement across
county property at the Harbor of Refuge property was discussed.
After some general discussion regarding the sewerline, the Board of
Commissioners voted to grant the.easement subject to the following
conditions:
1. All regulatory permits shall be obtained and satisfied prior
to formal approval of the easement.
2. Concerns by the Harkers`',Point Preservation Committee,
including the preservation and maintenance of the cemetery and
use of the beach, shall be settled prior to formal approval of
the easement.
This letter should allow Mr. Moore to move forward in -the necessary
subdivision regulations review process. If you have any, questions
.concerning the letter; please contact my office.' We look forward
to working with you on this project.
Sin erely yours,
AyrRage ✓
County Manager
GLP/jd
RLHO RE.LTR
9
Carteret Coanty Courthouse • Courthouse Souare - Beaufortt. North Carn)inn 2951r-7AQA

ondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to -the work performed by it during the contract, shell not.
acr m na o on he grounds of race, color, or notional origin in the selection and retention of subcon-
tractors, including procurements of materials and leaned of equipment. The contractor shall not 1partiei-
pate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations,
including employment'practieea when the contract covers a progrem not forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.
c. 5ollcitations for Subcoitt racte Includin Procuretsante of Mat crialo end E S mcnt: Irt all eolicltatione
. o for y comps vo. t crag or nags as on Ica e y e con zac or or xor o be performed under a sub-
contract, including procurements of materials orloanoa of equipment, each potential subcontractor or
supplier shall too notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
d. Information and Report,: The rnntraetor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, of directives
.sued pur.T ..r, ther;t;v and Shall permit access to its books, ,records, accounts, other sources of Information, and its facilities
as may be determined by the 3t;n.te,ent of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain Compliance
with such Regulations or directives. whore any Information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another
who falls or refuses to furnish this. Information, the contractor shall so certify to the Department of Transportation, or the.Federil
Highway Administration as appro;.riate, and shall set fcrth what`cfforts It -has made to obtain the information.
a, Sanction, farNons In the event or the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract
the 6epartnent off TT ransportaticn shall Impose such eont.aet sanetions.as it or the Federal highway Administration may determine to
be apprepriato, Including; jbut not limited to, -
(:) withholding of payments to the contractor under the 'contract uptil the contractor complies. and/or '
(2) cancellation, termination or auspenslon of the coetfact, in whole or In part.
(, Incorpo_ntlon of Provislonst The contractor shall inch.da the provisions of paragraphs "a" through "f" In every subcontract,
ne ua rag prowremonts at materials and leases of equiprent, unlesv exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant
thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect *to any subcontract or procurement as the Department of Transportation
or the Federal highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions Including sanctions for noncampllaneet
Provided, horevar, that. In the event a contractor bacoeas Involved in, or Is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or
supplier as a result of such direetlon,.the eonraetor may request the Department of Transportation to -enter Into such litigation to
protect the Interacts 'of the State, and, in addition, the contractor may request the United State, to enter Into such litigation
to protect the Interests of the United States.
.I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each.of'the parties.;to-this agreement has caused the same to
be executed'in the day and -year first above written.
DEPARTNENT'OF TRANSPORTATION.
•BY.: f5. _ ' sex .7?f.' % POW
DIVISION ENGINEM
ATTEST OR WITNESS:.' :
:• HTB Associates, L.L.C.
',i.'_Pollo6y� ..�J.,aA' , � C , :H rri Pr dent •
v
Second' arty • .
INSTRUCTIONS '
When the applicant Is &,corporation or, municipality, this agraement'must have the corporate sea; amd be allotted by the
corporation secretary or by the was werad city official, uniest a waiver or corporate seal and attestation by the secretary
or by the empowered City official is on file In he Raleigh office of the Manager of Right of way. In the space provided In
this agreement for 'exacutIon, the acme of the corporatI on or mun l cl pal l ty shall be typed above the name and title of all
persons tigning the agreement should be typed directly below, [hair signature. This agreement must be accompanied, In the form of an attach?ant, by plans or drawings showing the following applicable
Information - '
I. All ruedwaY sand ramps ,i - •;
2. Right of,way lines and,where•applieable,.thb eonlrol of ace -ass lines
l., Location of .the eAlsting and/or. proposed ancroachmant7
4. Length, sl3a and type of encroachment':•r.it'i
S. Method of-,lnstallation ).,. .'... ,
6. D Imam Ions, showing the distance' fromithe'eneroaehment� !to edge of pavement.:ehoulders;structures. etc.
' 7. Location by highway survey station number. If statlon;numbar.cannol be obtained, location should be shown by dl,-
_distance from some Identiflable point; such as a brldge,, road;'. Intersection, etc. (To assist In preparation of the
encroachment plan. the Departm.or
8, Drainage structures or, bridges If affected by encroachment (shoe vertical and horizontal dimensions from encroach-
ment to nearest part of structure) .. ,
9. Method of attachment to drat lnage atructures or bridges. .
10.. Manhole design'.: : 2..:
I1: On underground utili.tles, the'depth:of bury under &ICtraavaled'lenes, shoulders /. dl tches, sidewalks, etc:.' ,
11. u: ¢.
Length. site and type of an se
required.., ' ''
13. On underground crossings,•notatlon as. to mathod of crossing - boring'and Jacking, open cat, etc.
14. Location of.vents; .y, Ir .l: u." .t' •'
` IGEKE 'L' REQUIREMENTS'';
'I.,:Any attachment to a beldgq'on Other- dralriaga`$Lrudtore mus C'b-c approved by.the Head of Structure Design In Raleigh
prior to'submisslon'of 'eneroaahment agreement to the Division Engineer. •' ,
2. All crossings should be as:nearas'poszlbla normal to'the cenlerllne of the highway. '
1. Minimum vertical clearances of overhead wires and cables above all roadways must. conform to clearances set out In
the National Electric Safety Coda. "
4. Encasements shall extend from ditch line to ditch line In cut sectionsandS' beyond toe of slopes In (III sections.
S. All vents should be extended to thi right of way.line or as otherwise required by the Department.
6. All pipe encaswents'as to material and strength shall meet the standards and specifications of the Department.
7. Any special provisions or specifications as to the performance of the work or the method of construction that may
be required by the Department must be shown on a separate sheet attached to eneroachmcnl agran ent provided, that
such Information cannot be shown on plant or drawings..
D. The Department's Division Engineer should be given notice by the applicant prior to actual stating of Installation
Included In this agraemant..

ROUTE .,.NCSR 1335 . PROJECTTATE OF NORTH CAR
Harker.Harkers:Point ..-COUNTY 'OF Carteret.'
DEPARTMENT OF, TRANSPORTATION. RIGHT-,OF,.WAY:ENCROACHMENT•`•AGREEMENT
: =AND PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HIGHWAYS
HTB Associates', L.L.C.,'c/o Clyde Harris
2105 West. Nast Street . ..
Wilson; N.C.'27893
e.
TNIS AGREEMENT,'made'and*entered"I'hto''thi.s'thel`6thday of February
:.:. 19 96
by and between the Department of Trans ortation y p
p ,,.pant of-thet.f.i first art;. an
HTB Associates, L.L.C. ,party of.the second part,
W 1 T'' N 'E,'S _S: E T'H
THAT'WHEREAS,'the..party of .the second past des'ires'to encroach on the right of.way
of the, public• road designated,'as, Route' NCSR 1335 ,., located '1110 feet south,'of the
southern abutment of Harker's Island,brid e.•,
with the construction and or erection of 2220 .1f of Gv PUP fr,vnu ntaa., c?� n C'nv 91
WHEREAS,,) t,i,s to the material advantage:of,.the party of the second part to effect
this encroachment, and the party of the.fi,rsti.,parf,,.Ih%the exercise of••author.ity'conferred
upon it by statute, is willing to permit' the "encroachment within the limits of the rl',dht
Of way as indicated.,, subject to.•the,conditions.'of this agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, MIS AGREED that the party of the first part hereby grants to the
party of the •second part the right and privilege to make this encroachment as shown on
attached'plan sheet (s), speeifica't16ns and special provisions whItch are'made a part
Hereof upon the following --conditions, to wit:
That the installation, operation, and maintenance of the'above described facility will be accomplished in ac-
cordanco with the party of the first part'a latest POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ACCOMM)DATING UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY
R161fS-OF-WAY, and ouch revisions and amendments there o ee may e n e ec a e a o a agreaman
ms n-
oron ,s to the,o Policies and procedures may :oo obtained from the Division Engineer or state utility
the party of the first part. g y Agent of
p
That the,vaid party -of the second part"binde'and obligates himself to install and maintain the encroaching
facility in such safeinterfere
and proper roper on that it will not interfere with or endanger travel upon Bald highway, nor
obstruct nor any -repair
with the proper maintenance thereof; to reimburse the party of the first part for the coat
incurred .For any•repa3 re or••mnintonance•to•Sts roadways and, structures necessary duo to the installation and ex-
iatence of the facilitiae of the party of the second part, and if at any time the party of the first part shell
require the removal of.or changes In the location of the caid fec111ties, that the said ps rty of the second pent
Linda himself, his eucceesora and assigns,. to .promptly-romovo�or alter the.said,facil It so, in order to conform,,,
to the said regvl remont, without any cost to the party of the first part.
That the party of the second part agrees to provide during construction and any subsequent maintenance
e igne signal lights, flagmen and other warning devices for the proper
Manual on Uniform Traffic. Control DBy is es for Strata and Ifi-hwaps-andtAmendment*for�euIn cosenteatcc with the
latest
mf or-
Part�n as o :o above zv ea an toga atl one may obtained from the Division Engineer of the party of the first
Thatuthe party of the second part hereby agree, to indemnify'and save harmless the party of the first part
from all damages 'end claims for tlamago that may arise by reason of the theta
llation and maintenance of this on-
croachaent.
That the patty of the deconrl part agree, to rentoro all .areas disturbed during inatallation and maintenance
to the cise everyon of the Dlvis:.on Engf near of the party of tho fir at'
part... The party of the accord part agree,
to exercise every rea,onat le prer:autlon"during construction end to to prevent eroding of o011; silting or
poll utSon of rivers, streams, lnl:ca; reservoirs, other water impoundments, ground surfaces or other property; or
ppollut Son of the air.- There shall be compliance with appllcablo rules'and regulations of the }forth Carolina•
Division of Environmental Management, North Carolina Sedimentation Control Co:mai,nlon, and with ordlnnnees•and
regulations of various countleo, muniripnlltlee and other otflclal agencies relating to pollution prevention and
control. When any installs tion or maintenance operation dicturbe the ground surface and the existing ground cover,
the party of the second part agrr:as to. remove and replace the . -add Or'othe'nrlae reestablish the prase cover to moot
the sati cfac tier of the Division Engineer of the party of the first part..
That the party of the second pert &green to Aeeumo the actual coot of any inepectl do of'the Work coniSdered to
be neeesenry }ry the USvi lion Enginoer ct the"party of* the 'fl rot pert.
That th'e'party of rtho eeeond part agreoa to have'�ava Slable at the construction •s lte, at all times during con-
otructlon, a copy of this ogre oment ,bowing evidence •of -approval by. tho•perty of -the first part The party of the.
t izot part rosarvee the right to atop all work unless, evidence of approval can be shown.
Provided the work rontalned in thin agreement is being performed on a completed highway open •to •t toff ic; the
party of t1:o second part a7reee to give written notice to tho;Ulvioioh Engineer of•tho party of the first part
when all work contained herein han been completed. Unlase specifically requested by the party of the first part,
written not Sco of completion of work on highway'prolecta• under. construction will not be required.•
Thafirstt in the cane of a the pliance with the terms of this•'ngiecment. by the party of the-eecond.part,.tho party
of the from
part renery oa the right to atop all work until the facility has been brought into compliance or ra-
mored fran the right'of way at do coat to the party of the f.irat.part.
Tpla ea In eyr ais Ly Loth pa tldee •th&t L'nle ogruameni siail,Locome void 1f netual eonatruetlon of the work
contomptateq narcin'is roc pagan witnin ono'f1) yoat rrom. tno••eato'etrauthorizatlon by the party or the first part
unless written waiver !a ceevred by the party of the second.p rt fiom'the party of the firat.part.
During afte the perfoimonan of thin contract', the decond part, y,' for iteolf,' Ito aff Bjgnea*'arld Bdcceesorn in interest
(hereinafter rotor rerl to as the 'cont trentor"), agrees as follow,:
.a. .Cam if arse ui t}i'Pr,•'Slatf dhs; Rho cent ratter shall comply wi th 'th'e Rarrll ntlone"relative to nondlscrlmin-
a inn in et ore y-sows er 'progrdrs ot, the U. P..•Department of Transportation; Title 49, Cade of Federal
RvjpA atian Part•21, 'aa they may bu Imenial frnm,1fine•,to timn,'•(hcrci'naftor referred tp as the f Fede-
tlnns), 'which era herein 'Sncorpora tern by :rcfcrence;16hd'made' & pa'rt of, ;tills contract.
FORM R/W 16.1 (Rev. July 1, 1977)

SOUND SENSE, INC.
P. 0, Drawer 429
Nags Head HC 27959
March 23, 1996
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh NC 27611
RE: Public Comments Concerning Harker's Point
(HTB Associates, L.L.C.) Major CRMR Permit
Application, DEM Stormwater Plan and
Permit application for Harker's Point Wastewater
System (Project No. 95-17)
Dear Director Schecter,
As Secretary of Sound Sense, Inc, an Outer Banks organization
of business people who have as our focus the need for continuing
vigilance as to the state of well-being of our surrounding
estuarine, sound and bay waters, may I direct your attention to the
following concerns about the above -titled project and its attendant
permit applications.
This is yet another attempt to "solve" the wastewater disposal
requirements of a development by throwing the effluent "overboard",
even though it may be indirect through dispersal into and onto
inadequate soils. There should not be any further permits that
allow the quality of HC waters to be further compromised.
The goals of the Coastal Area Management Act are clear, and
the regulations provide sufficient power to prevent applications of
this kind to gain any legitimacy.
We join with the North Carolina Coastal Federation, North
Carolina Wildlife Federation, Watermen Aligned for the Environment
and Resources, Carteret County Crossroads, Sierra Club, Pamlico -Tar
River Foundation and the Conservation Council of North Carolina
urging you to exercise your authority to deny any and all St
permits and authorizations for this project. o RE VEL
With greatest personal respect, Ma to10NV 61
00
Q'E�cEMENS
Ralph 2eiss, Secretjj�M ,,

3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) - NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
March 18, 1996
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
w
Preston Howard, Director
NC Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Victor D'Amato
N.C. Division of Environmental Health
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
I
11ARR 2 0
,v
""844"a a r i a s uu nueu RxaS W"
RE: Public Comments Concerning Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) Major
CAMA Permit Application, DEM Stormwater Plan, and Permit Application for
Harker's Point Wastewater System (Project No. 95-17)
Dear Roger, Preston and Victor:
These comments are submitted by the North Carolina Coastal Federation, North Carolina
Wildlife Federation, Watermen Aligned for the Environment and Resources; Carteret
County Crossroads; Sierra Club, Pamlico -Tar River Foundation and Conservation
Council of North Carolina. These local, regional and statewide groups are commenting on
this project because it clearly illustrates why we are losing the battle up and down our coast
to protect shellfish waters and our marine fisheries., -
The applicant proposes in his CAMA permit application to construct 28 residential units, a
60,000 gpd wastewater treatment plant, and "future development," all on four types of soils
that the Carteret County Soil Survey classifies as having "severe" limitations for building
and wastewater treatment. This large proposed development is being reviewed by a
multitude of state agencies in an uncoordinated and piecemeal fashion that ensures that
coastal water quality will not be protected.
4Bmal ncCfQCnaStahlet.COm WWWHomc Page:htV://wwwcastnc.cwstal.neccom/nccf/nccf htm

F
Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
March 18, 1996
Page 2
Our organizations have serious concerns with the permit review process for this project. It is
failing to achieve a basic goal of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) which is: "to
insure that the development and preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal
area proceeds in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for
development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations. " We believe that
CAMA provides both the authority and responsibility to coordinate the permit review process
to insure that open and highly productive shellfishing waters immediately next to this site are
protected.
"
We encourage each State agency involved in reviewing various aspects of this project to
coordinate their review based upon the following considerations:
1) The CAMA Permit application was submitted without providing adequate
information regarding the applicant's total development plans. In reviewing this permit
application, CAMA regulations (T15A NCAC 7J .0203(c)) require the applicant to disclose
detailed information on any development located in or directly impacting an AEC. CAMA
also mandates an evaluation of the cumulative impacts of this proposed project (NCGS 113A-
121(a)(10)). The application provides insufficient information to conduct this required
anal. Based on the Coastal Resources Commission rules, the application should contain
information on the development plans for the entire acreage besides the 28 residential lots
that touch an AEC. More information is needed to figure out the impact that approximately
140 additional residential units (the remaining estimated capacity of the proposed wastewater
treatment plant) will have on AEC's located on and by this tract of land. (A subdivision plat
submitted to Carteret County Planning Department the day after you received this permit
"<%%- application shows 41 lots on 27.96 acre portion of this property.) It is particularly important
that you obtain this information since the site contains soils that are classified as having
"severe" building limitations.
4eb-,- ,
2) Wastewater treatment plant effluent will take approximately 15 days to discharge into
nearby SA waters and will violate SA water quality standards. Based upon the pump
test report submitted by the applicant, it will take approximately 15 days for wastewater to
move laterally as groundwater from the sewage treatment plant into a nearby deadend tidal
creek classified as open sheilfishing waters. The two types of course sandy soils at the waste
disposal site will provide only minimal removal of bacteria and nutrients in the tertiary
treated effluent.' The water quality parameters of greatest concern are nitrate and nitrite.
[According to the Carteret County Soil Survey, the waste disposal area has two types of soils: Leon sand
and Mandairin sand. The permeability of Leon is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate to
moderately rapid in the weakly cemented subsoil. The soil is not used as cropland because of wetness during
winter and spring, droughty in summer, and leaching of plant nutrients. It has 'severe" limitations for sewage
treatment because of seepage, wetness, and poor filtering. Mandarin sand also has rapid permeability in the
surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is low. It also has

Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
' March 18, 1996
Page 3
Even if the treated effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), it can
be safely assumed that no further denitrophication will occur once the effluent is discharged
into the ground. This means that nitrate will leach laterally into the adjacent SA waters at
levels that exceed the "Chlorophyll a" standard (15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal
saltwaters by approximately 1,800%? This concentration of nitrate concentration is
exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make conditions in the deadend tidal creek
unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore, the project violates water quality
standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's
Angdegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201).
We are also extremely concerned about fecal coliform, pathogens and viruses that may be
contained in the effluent from this plant. No effluent quality parameters for fecal coliform
are specified in the permit application. Pathogens and viruses are present in tertiary treated
wastewater. Given the rapid groundwater movement between the waste disposal site and the
adjacent estuary, existing uses of the open shellfishing waters may be threatened by this
project.
3) Stormwater runoff could violate water quality standards for shellfishing waters, but
the application contains insufficient information to evaluate compliance with coastal &/ /1 Gc
stormwater regulations. Except for the Carteret County Harbor of Refuge, all of the waters
next to this project are open to shellfishing. Stormwater runoff from the proposed cy 6^ °
development will contain fecal coliform and nutrient levels that exceed state standards for S4,r� —k
shellfishing waters. It is impossible to evaluate the adequacy of the stormwater plan without - F SR s
more detailed plans regarding the project's final buildout. Saltwater and freshwater wetlandssrOl�
on this site should not be used to calculate the percent of the property covered by impervious
surfaces.
4) Filling the open water basin will violate the state's Antidegradation Policy and water ik
quality standards. State water quality regulations prohibit the filling of the lagoon located
on this property. This basin is connected to estuarine waters and contains "existing uses" af�/i^�
protected by state water quality standards for open SA waters. The site cannot be usedfor a
A'FsrEr
marina because of its status as open shellfishing waters.
"severe' limitations for sewage treatment because of wetness, poor filtering capacity, and seepage.
ZAccording to Dr. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory, field and laboratory studies
have found that marine and estuarine phytoplankton will produce about 1 ug/l (microgram per liter) of
chlorophyll a from 1 umol/l (micromole per liter) of nitrate. The groundwater standard is 10 mg/1
(milligram/liter) of NO' as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard to micromoles of nitrate, fast divide
by 14 (the atomic weight of nitrogen), then multiply by 1000 to convert millimmoles to micromoles (10114 =
0.714). 0.714 x 1000 = 714 ug/l chlorophyll from 10 mg/1 nitrate as nitrogen. Therefore, wastewater
containing 10 mg/1 of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels of 714 ug/l in the nearby tidal waters. This
level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters. -

Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
March 18, 1996
Page 4
5) Waterfront piers fronting on the Straits will impede pedestrian access to the beach. so ftJ A
Piers located on lots three through 16 could have docks with four slips each. These piers
fyP.9 w.
will impede the traditional and established use of this beach by the public for swimming and
fishing. all"�
p�JI'C
6) Piers with boat slips will disturb and degrade vital estuary habitat. The shallow
estuarine waters surrounding the proposed development contain submerged aquatic vegetation
that is vulnerable to damage because of shading from piers and boating activity. Appropriate
pie .sites and docking locations should be established as part of the master plan for this
project, and not left up to individual homeowners that purchase lots in the subdivision.
In conclusion, State permits and authorizations for this project should be denied
based upon the concerns identified above. As proposed, the project will result in the
violation of state water quality standards. This project is simply too big for this piece of
property that is poorly suited for this scale of development. The four types of soils found on
the property have "severe" development constraints and adjacent waters are extremely
sensitive to pollution.
We do realize that this property can accommodate some development. Therefore, we
encourage all the State agencies involved in reviewing permit applications for this property to
get together and coordinate their reviews so that stormwater runoff, leachate from sewage,
and development in public trust areas will not violate state regulatory standards.
Please notify us immediately of any actions taken by your agencies regarding this
application. We particularly would like to receive any additional information or
modifications to the application that may be submitted.
Thank you for considering these comments.
Sind, ,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
cc: Jonathan Howes, Secretary,.DEHNR
Linda Rimer, Deputy Secretary, DEHNR
Rick Shiver, DEM
Linda Sewell, DEH
Bruce Freeman, DMF
Dave Moreau, EMC
Pete Peterson, EMC
Charles Jones, DCM
Bob Benton, Shellfish Sanitation
Interested Press

NORTH rAD OLINA
COASTAL
FEDERATION
3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) • NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 - [phone] • Fax [phone]
Roger Schecter, Director
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
March 18, 1996
w
Preston Howard, Director
INC Divisi= of Ennvlromn ..tal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Victor D'Amato
N.C. Division of Environmental Health
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Branch
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
�PUEVEU
MAR 201996
COASFAt
MANAGEMENT
RE: Public Comments Concerning Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) Major
CAMA Permit Application, DIEM Stormwater Plan, and Permit Application for
Harker's Point Wastewater System (Project No. 95-17)
Dear Roger, Preston and Victor:
These comments are submitted by the North Carolina Coastal Federation, North Carolina
Wildlife Federation, Watermen Aligned for the Environment and Resources; Carteret
County Crossroads; Sierra Club, Pamlico -Tar River Foundation and Conservation
Council of North Carolina. These local, regional and statewide groups are commenting on
this project because it clearly illustrates why we are losing the battle up and down our coast
to protect shellfish waters and our marine fisheries.
The applicant proposes in his CAMA permit application to construct 28 residential units, a
60,000 gpd wastewater treatment plant, and "future development," all on four types of soils
that the Carteret County Soil Survey classifies as having "severe" limitations for building
and wastewater treatment. This large proposed development is being reviewed by a
multitude of state agencies in an uncoordinated and piecemeal fashion that ensures that
coastal water quality will not be protected.
&man ncdOca talnet.com WWWHo=Page:http://w.castnc.coastal.ntt.com/accf/ncd'.htm

Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
March 18, 1996
Page 2
Our organizations have serious concerns with the permit review process for this project. It is
failing to achieve a basic goal of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) which is: "to
insure that the development and preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal
area proceeds in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for
development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations. " We believe that
CAMA provides both the authority and responsibility to coordinate the permit review process
to insure that open and highly productive shellfishing waters immediately next to this site are
protected.
We encourage each State agency involved in reviewing various aspects of this project to
coordinate their review based upon the following considerations:
1) The CAMA permit application was submitted without providing adequate
information retarding the applicant's total development plans. In reviewing this permit
application, CAMA regulations (T15A NCAC W .0203(c)) require the applicant to disclose
detailed information on any development located in or directly impacting an AEC. CAMA
also mandates an evaluation of the cumulative impacts of this proposed project (NCGS 113A-
121(a)(10)). The application provides insufficient information to conduct this required
analysis. Based on the Coastal Resources Commission rules, the application should contain
information on the development plans for the entire acreage besides the 28 residential lots
that touch an AEC. More information is needed to figure out the impact that approximately -
^. 140 additional residential units (the remaining estimated capacity of the proposed wastewater
treatmen—f—pla—nO—MiThave on AEC's located on and by this tract of land. (A subdivision plat
sub yttio toh=on27
g Department the day after you received this permit
applications ws�41cre portion of this property.) It is particularly importantthat od ob " the site contains soils that are classified as having
"severe" building limitations.
2) Wastewater treatment plant effluent will take approximately 15 days to discharge into' (I
nearby SA waters and will violate SA water quality standards. Based upon the pump
test report submitted by the applicant, it wilt take approximately 15 days for wastewater to
move laterally as groundwater from the sewage treatment plant into a nearby deadend tidal
creek classified as open shellfishing waters. The two types of course sandy soils at the waste
disposal site will provide only minimal removal of bacteria and nutrients in the tertiary
treated effluent.' The water quality parameters of greatest concern are nitrate and nitrite.
'According to the Carteret County Soil Survey, the waste disposal area has two types of soils: Leon sand
and Mandairin sand. The permeability of Leon is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate to
moderately rapid in the weakly cemented subsoil. The soil is not used as cropland because of wetness during '
winter and spring, droughty in summer, and leaching of plant nutrients. It has "severe" limitations for sewage
treatment because of seepage, wetness, and poor filtering. Mandarin sand also has rapid permeability in the ,
surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is low. It also bas -

Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
March 18, 1996
Page 3
Even if the treated effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), it can
be safely assumed that no further denitrophication will occur once the effluent is discharged
into the ground. This means that nitrate will leach laterally into the adjacent SA waters at
levels that exceed the "Chlorophyll a" standard (15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal
saltwaters by approximately 1,800%.2 This concentration of nitrate concentration is
exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make conditions in the deadend tidal creek
unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore, the project violates water quality
standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's
Antidegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201).
We are also extremely concerned about fecal coliform, pathogens and viruses that may be
contained in the effluent from this plant. No effluent quality parameters for fecal coliform
are specified in the permit application. Pathogens and viruses are present in tertiary treated
wastewater. Given the rapid groundwater movement between the waste disposal site and the
adjacent estuary, existing uses of the open shellfishing waters may be threatened by this
project.
3) Sttormw_ater runoff could violate water quality standards for shellfishing waters, but
the application contains insufficient information to evaluate compliance with coastal
stormwater regulations. Except for the Carteret County Harbor of Refuge, all of the waters
next to this project are open to shellfishing. Stormwater runoff from the proposed
development will contain fecal coliform and nutrient levels that exceed state standards for '
shellfishing waters. It is impossible -to evaluate the adequacy of the stormwater plan without
more detailed plans regarding the project's final buildout. Saltwater and freshwater wetlands
on this site should not be used to calculate the percent of the property covered by imRgrvious
surfaces. .
4) filling the open water basin will violate the slate's Antidegradation Policy and water
quality standards. State water quality regulations prohibit the filling of the lagoon located
on this property. This basin is conn� to estuarine waters and contains "existing uses".
protected by state water quality standards for open SA waters. The site cannot be used for a.
marina because of its status as open shellfishing waters.
"severe" limitations for sewage treatment because of wetness; poor filtering capacity, and seepage.
ZAccording to Dr. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory, field and laboratory studres
have found that marine and estuarine phytoplankton will produce about 1 ug/l (microgram per liter) of
chlorophyll a from 1 umol/1 (micromole per liter) of nitrate. The groundwater standard is 10 mg/1
(milligram/liter) of NV as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard to micromoles of nitrate,
by 14 (the atomic weight of nitrogen), then multiply by 1000 to convert millimmoles to micromoles (10/14 -
0.714). 0.714 x 1000 = 714 ug/l chlorophyll from 10 mg/l nitrate as nitrogen. Theiefore,'wastewatec r ,
containing 10 mg/l of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels of 714 ug/1 in the nearby tidal waters.
level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters.
S �
Y

Letter of Comment on Harker's Point
March 18, 1996
Page 4
5) Waterfront piers fronting on the Straits will impede pedestrian access to the beach.
Piers located on lots three through 16 could have docks with four slips each. These piers
will impede the traditional and established use of this beach by the public for swimming and
fishing.
6) Piers with boat slips will disturb and degrade vital estuary habitat. The shallow
estuarine waters surrounding the proposed development contain submerged aquatic vegetation
that is vulnerable to damage because of shading from piers and boating activity. Appropriate
pie sites and docking locations should be established as part of the master plan for this .
project, and not left up to individual homeowners that purchase lots in the subdivision.
In conclusion, State permits and authorizations for this project should be denied
based upon the concerns identified above. As proposed, the project will result in the
violation of state water quality standards. This project is simply too big for this piece of
property that is poorly suited for this scale of development. The four types of soils found on
the property have "severe" development constraints and adjacent waters are extremely
sensitive to pollution.
We do realize that this property can accommodate some development. Therefore, we
encourage all the State agencies involved in reviewing permit applications for this property to
get together and coordinate their reviews so that stormwater runoff, leachate from sewage,
and development in public trust areas will not violate state regulatory standards.
Please notify us immediately of any actions taken by your agencies regarding this
application. We particularly would like to receive any additional information or
modifications to the application that may be submitted.
Thank you for considering these comments.
- Sincerely
Todd Miller
Executive Director
cc, Jonathan Howes, Secretary, DEHNR Dave Moreau, EMC
Linda Rimer, Deputy Secretary, DEHNR Pete Peterson, EMC
Rick Shiver, DEM Charles Jones, DCM
Linda Sewell, DEW Bob Benton, Shellfish Sanitation ;
Bruce Freeman, DUT Interested Press
.
� f
1

COASTAL
FEDERATION
3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) . NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 • [phone] - Fax [phone]
May 18, 1996
Mr. Preston Howard, Director
NC Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Harker's Point Wastewater System, Harkers Island, NC
Dear Preston:
Attached are letters from various state files on the proposed Harker's Point
Wastewater System on Harkers Island. Two previous letters we sent to your Division
regarding this project expressed our concerns that the project appeared to be moving
forward without adequate safeguards for groundwater and shellfish waters. We believe that
this project provides a classic example of why we are continuing to lose the battle to
protect water quality in coastal North Carolina.
The attached May 3 memo from your groundwater section states that the project is
likely to violate groundwater standards for nitrate. This finding by your technical experts
clearly contradicts the conclusions made by Steve Tedder in his April 10 memo that the
project "should not pose any adverse effect on surface water quality." Even if the treated
effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), that level of nitrate
leaching laterally into the adjacent SA waters will result in your "Chlorophyll a" standard
(15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal saltwaters being exceeded by approximately 1,800%.'
This concentration of nitrate is exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make
conditions in the deadend tidal creek unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore,
the project violates water quality standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A
'According to Dr. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory, field and laboratory studies
have found that marine and estuarine phytoplankton will produce about 1 ug/l (microgram per liter) of
chlorophyll a from 1 umol/1 (micromole per liter) of nitrate. The groundwater standard is 10 mg/1
(milIigram/liter) of NO' as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard to micromoles of nitrate d'i t(1. / i
by 14 (the atomic weight of nitrogen), then multiply by 1000 to convert millimmoles to micromo
0.714). 0.714 x 1000 = 714 ug/1 chlorophyll from 10 mg/I nitrate as nitrogen. Therefore, w at EVE
containing 10 mg/1 of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels of 714 ug/1 in the nearby tid `ters lyg$
level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters.
E-mail =Ncoastalnet.mm W W WHome Page http://www3.coastalneLcom/nccf/homenaee.htm

Letter to Preston Howard
May 18, 1996
Page 2
NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's Antidegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201). We
have calculated that the nitrate level in the groundwater flowing into the estuary will have
to be below .56 mg/1 to avoid violations of your "Chlorophyll a" water quality standard
of 40 ug/l.
The Coastal Federation applauds the work of your groundwater section for
' taking- the initiative to revisit and thoroughly evaluate this permit request. We
encourage you to continue to examine nitrate issues for all future requests to operate
package treatment plants that would be located in close proximity to tidal waters.
Please advise us as to any further actions that your Division will take in regard to
the permit application.
Sincerely,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
Attachments
cc: Interested Press and Citizens
NC Division of Coastal Management
Jonathan Howes, DEHNR
Joan Weld, Governor's Office
Rick Shiver, DEM

i
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
WAAY 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brian Wootton
THROUGH: Charles Stehman, Ph.D., P.G.
FROM. Bruce Parris
SUBJECT: Harker's Island Central System - Phase I
Review of Additional Information and Recent Modeling Performed by the Central
Office —
Harker's Island
Tertiary Treatment WWTP - LPP Field
Carteret County
GW#96096/DEH#95-17
This memo is being written in regard to additional information for the subject site which has
been received by the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) Groundwater Section (GWS) and in
response to the predictive computer models which we received from you on May 1, 1996.
A review of the permit application package was previously conducted by the WiRO-GWS and
our comments were filed on May 19, 1995. The applicant had filed a package for review which
consisted of a tertiary treatment -wastewater treatment plant, and a total of 57,200 ftZ of LPP
fields. The proposed flow rate for the system was going to be 14,760 gpd in Phase I with
potential future expansions of up to 40,000 gpd. Based on the information contained in the
applicant's package, and on a site visit by WiRO personnel, the WiRO did not object to issuance
of the permit for Phase I. However, due to potential groundwater concerns, monitoring wells
were recommended to be installed at the review boundary at the site so that any groundwater
violations could be detected.
Since the May 19, 1995 review, additional information regarding potential groundwater impacts
at the site has been provided to the WiRO. Specifically, the WiRO-GWS received copies of two
correspondences written by the Coastal Federation on March 18, 1996 and April 2, 1996 which
detail their concerns with a waste disposal facility being constructed at the subject site. In
regard to groundwater, the Coastal Federation's concerns are primarily oriented around the
degradation of water=quality and shellfishing in the waters of a nearby tidal creek as a result of
contaminated groundwater discharging into the sound from the LPP field. Also contained in
Coastal Federation's letters was a statement that the subject site will be ultimately applying for

' Mr. Brian Wootton
May 3, 1996
Page Two
a discharge rate of 60,000 gpd with the potential for expansions. This is a significantly higher
discharge rate than the applicant's original package which proposed a discharge rate of 14,760
gpd with potential future amendments for increasing the discharge rate to 40,000 gpd.
Additionally, in response to the concerns of the Coastal Federation, you ran a computer model
to track nitrate concentrations in groundwater through time at the subject site. The models were
run under differing nitrate concentrations, with and without decay rates, so that a variety of
potential site conditions could be predicted. The modeling results indicate that a strong potential
for violations of 15A NCAC 2L nitrate concentrations at the subject site's compliance boundary
exist.
Based on the additional information and modeling predictions, the WiRO-GWS has concerns that
the facility would not be able to achieve 15A NCAC 2L groundwater standards at it's
compliance boundary. Since there were previous concerns of impacts to groundwater quality
at lower flow rates, the WiRO-GWS cannot recommend issuance of a permit for the facility.
CFS/brp
cc: WiRO-GWS Files
S:\GWS\PARRIS\PERMrrS\ELkRYERSI.NEM
05/03/96
a

State of North Carolina I
Department of Environme1,19
C���4�
Health and Natural •Division of Environmental Ma
--------------_--��
----
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � ^ ,
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary , V
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director ^,(�
April 10, 1996 J
MEMORANDUM
To: William Jeter, Chief
On -Site Wastewater Engineering
Division of Environmental Health
From: Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Subject: OS WS Project No. 95-17
Harker's Point Wastewater System
Harker's Island
Carteret County
Staff of the Water Quality Section have reviewed the subject project with respect to
concerns about potential adverse impacts to adjacent surface waters.
The proposed project's wastewater treatment and disposal system is a tertiary system that
should afford a high quality effluent. Although the effluent will not be denitrified, the
nitrate levels should not,pose any adverse effect on surface water quality. Discussions with
the DEM's Groundwater staff indicate that the modeling runs conducted show that the
travel time to reach the..'earest surface waters would be several months to approximately a
year based upon the site characteristics. It is also their opiniun that ti,e nitrete'.e
be dissipated or attenuated due to the movement of the effluent through the subsurface
soils, the dilution and dispersion in the groundwater, and the dilution and dispersion in the
surface waters. Based upon these discussions and opinions, we do not object to the
proposed project.
We appreciate the opportunity to review the subject project. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Don Safrit, P.E.. -assistant Chief for Technical
Support at [phone], extension 519.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office'
Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919=733-9919
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled' 10 % post -consumer paper

COASTAL
FEDERATION
3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) - NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 - (919) 3 3-8185 - Fax [phone]
May 18, 1996
Mr. Preston Howard, Director
NC Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Harker's Point Wastewater System, Harkers Island, NC
Dear Preston:
Attached are letters from various state files on the proposed Harker's Point
Wastewater System on Harkers Island. Two previous letters we sent to your Division
regarding this,.project expressed our. concerns that the project appeared to be moving
forward without adequate safeguards for groundwater aiid shellfish waters. We believe that
this project provides a classic example of'why we are continuing to lose the battle to
protect water quality in coastal North Carolina.
The attached May 3 memo from your groundwater section states that the project is
likely to violate groundwater standards for nitrate. This finding by your technical experts
clearly contradicts the conclusions made by Steve Tedder in his April 10 memo that the
project "should not pose any adverse effect on surface water quality." Even if the treated
effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), that level of nitrate
leaching laterally into the adjacent SA waters will result in your "Chlorophyll a" standard
(15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal saltwaters being exceeded by approximately 1,800%.1
This concentration of nitrate is exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make
conditions in the deadend tidal creek unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore,
the project violates water quality standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A
,'According to Dr.. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory,.field and laboratory studies
have found that marine. and'estuarine phytoplamton will produce about 1 ug/I (microgram per liter) of
Chlorophylla from I umol/1 (micromole per liter) of nitrate.' The -groundwater standard is 10 mg/1
(milligram liter) of N0' as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard io miciomoles of nitrate, firs . ' 1 i2
by 14 (the atomic weight of.nitrogen), .then multiply by 1000 to convert millimutoles'to micromoles. ( = pcc
0:714). 0.714 x 1000. = 714'ug/1 chlorophyll from 10 mg/1 nitrate as nitrogen. Therefore, wastew ' cCF�VEQ
containing 10 mg/1 of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels of 714 ug/l in the nearby tidal wa T1�81Y
level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters. f�ATdd8 s6NT
4 &mail [e-mail] W W WHome Page http://www3.coastalneLcom/ncef/homepage.htm

Letter to Preston Howard
May 18, 1996
Page 2
NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's Antidegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201). We
have calculated that the nitrate level in the groundwater flowing into the estuary_ will have
to be below .56 mg/1 to avoid violations of your "Chlorophyll a" water quality standard
of 40 ug/l.
The Coastal Federation applauds the work of your groundwater section for
taking the initiative to revisit and thoroughly evaluate this permit request. We
encourage you to continue to examine nitrate issues for all future requests to operate
package treatment plants that would be located in close proximity to tidal waters.
Please advise us as to any further actions that your Division will take in regard to
the permit application.
Sincerely,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
Attachments _ - - - .
CC: Interested Press and Citizens
NC Division of Coastal Management
Jonathan Howes, DEHNR
Joan Weld, Governor's Office
Rick Shiver, DEM

' DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
!%MAY 3, 1996 V
MEMbR.AN•DUM
TO: Brian Wootton
THROUGH: Charles Stehman, Ph.D., P.G.IZD
FROM: Bruce Parris St oo
SUBJECT: Harker's Island Central System - Phase I
Review of Additional Information and Recent Modeling Performed by the Central
Office
Harker's Island
Tertiary Treatment WWTP - LPP Field
Carteret County
GW#96096/DEH#95-17
This memo is being written in regard to additional information for the subject site -which has
been received by the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) Groundwater Section (GWS) and in
response to the predictive computer models which we received from you on May 1, 1996.
A review of the permit application package was previously conducted by the WiRO-GWS and
our comments were filed on May 19, 1995. The applicant had filed a package for review which
consisted of a tertiary treatment -wastewater treatment plant, and a total of 57,200 ft' of LPP
fields. The proposed flow rate for the system was going to be 14,760 gpd in Phase I with
potential future expansions of up to 40,000 gpd. Based on the information contained in the
applicant's package, and on a site visit by WiRO personnel, the WiRO did not object to issuance
of the permit for Phase I. However, due to potential groundwater concerns, monitoring wells
were recommended to be installed at the review boundary at the site so that any groundwater
violations could be detected.
Since the May 19, 1995 review, additional information regarding potential groundwater impacts
at the site has been provided to the WiRO. Specifically, the WiRO-GWS received copies of two
correspondences written by the Coastal Federation on March 18, 1996 and April 2, 1996 which
detail their concerns with a waste disposal facility being constructed at the subject site. In
regard to groundwater, the Coastal Federation's concerns are primarily oriented around the
degradation of water ;quality and shellftshing in the waters of a nearby tidal creek as a result of
contaminated groundwater discharging into the sound from the LPP field. Also contained in
Coastal Federation's letters was a statement that the subject site will be ultimately applying for

Mr. Brian Wootton
May 3, 1996
Page Two
a discharge rate of 60,000 gpd with the potential for'expansiois: This is'a significantly higher
discharge rate than the applicant's original package which proposed a discharge rate of 14,760
gpd with potential future amendments for increasing the discharge rate to 40,000 gpd.
Additionally, in response to the concerns of the Coastal Federation, you ran a computer model
to track nitrate concentrations in groundwater through time at the subject site. The models were
run under differing nitrate concentrations, with and without decay rates, so that a variety of
potential site conditions could be predicted. The modeling results indicate that a strong potential
for violations of 15A NCAC 2L nitrate concentrations at the subject site's compliance boundary
exist.
Based on the additional information and modeling predictions, the WiRO-GWS has concerns that
the facility would not be able to achieve 15A NCAC 2L groundwater standards at it's
compliance boundary. Since there were previous concerns of impacts to groundwater quality
at lower flow rates, the WiRO-GWS cannot recommend issuance of a permit for the facility.
CFS/brp
cc: WiRO-GWS Files
S:\GWS\PARRIS\PERMTTS\HARKERSI.MEM
05/03/96
IR

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmell��m@NSTIE
Health and Natural Resourl e 5 1996 !J 4 • •
Division of Environmental Ma gdVp
-- - ------------==rdl
James B. Hunt, we Governor � ^ ,
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary — , V
A. P.reston,Howard, Jr.,.Director
April 10, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: William Jeter, Chief
On -Site Wastewater Engin
Division of Environmental
From: Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Subject: OSWS Project No. 95-17
Harker's Point Wastewater System
Harker's Island
Carteret County
Staff of the Water Quality Section have reviewed the subject project with respect to
concerns about potential adverse impacts to adjacent surface waters.
The proposed project's wastewater treatment and disposal system is a tertiary system that
should afford a high quality effluent. Although the effluent will not be denitrified, the
nitrate levels should not -pose any adverse effect on surface water quality. Discussions with
the DEM's Groundwater staff indicate that the modeling runs conducted show that the
travel time to reach the nearest surface waters would be several months to approximately a
year based upon the site characteristics, It is also their opinion that Me nitr�te'le c3r.:*. —i
be dissipated or attenuated due to the movement of the effluent through the subsurface
soils, the dilution and dispersion in the groundwater, and the dilution and dispersion in the
surface waters. Based upon these discussions and opinions, we do not object to the
proposed project.
We appreciate the opportunity to review the subject project. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Don Safrit, P.E.. Assistant Chief for Technical
Support at [phone], extension 519.
cc: =Wiliiuiigton Regional Office'`-`
Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919=733-9919
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled' to% post -consumer paper

COASTAL
FEDERATION
3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) • NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 - [phone] • Fax [phone]
May 18, 1996
Mr. Preston Howard, Director
NC Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
RE: Harker's Point Wastewater System, Harkers Island, NC
Dear Preston:
Attached are letters from various state files on the proposed Harker's Point
Wastewater System on Harkers Island. Two previous letters we sent to your Division
regarding this project expressed our concerns that the project appeared to be moving
forward -without .adequate safeguards for groundwater and shellfish waters. We believe that
this project provides a classic example of why we are continuing to lose the battle to
protect water quality in coastal North Carolina.
The attached May 3 memo from your groundwater section states that the project is
likely to violate groundwater standards for nitrate. This finding by your technical experts
clearly contradicts the conclusions made by Steve Tedder in his April 10 memo that the
project "should not pose any adverse effect on surface water quality." Even if the treated
effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), that level of nitrate
leaching laterally into the adjacent SA waters will result in your "Chlorophyll a" standard
(15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal saltwaters being exceeded by approximately 1,800%.t
This concentration of nitrate is exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make
conditions in the deadend tidal creek unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore,
the project violates water quality standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A
[According to Dr. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory, field and laboratory studies
have found that marine and estuarine phytoplankton will produce about 1 ug/1 (microgram per liter) of
chlorophyll a from 1 umol/1.,(micromole per liter) of nitrate. ,The groundwater standard is 10 me/1
(milligram/liter) of NO' as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard to.micromol(
-by 14 (the atomic,weight of nitrogen), then multiply by.1000 to convert millimmoles to
0.714). 0.714 x 1000 = 714 ug/l chlorophyll from 10 mg/1nitrate as nitrogen. Therel
containing 10 mg/l of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels'of 714 ug/l in the neat
level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters.
Email ncd2coastalnet.com W W WHome Page http,//www3.coastalneLcom/nccf/homepage.htn

Letter to Preston Howard
May 18, 1996
Page 2
NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's Antidegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201). We
have calculated that the nitrate level in the groundwater flowing into the estuary will have
to be below .56 mg/1 to avoid violations of your "Chlorophyll a" water quality standard
of 40 ug/l.
The Coastal Federation applauds the work of your groundwater section for
taking the initiative to revisit and thoroughly evaluate this permit request. We
encourage you to continue to examine nitrate issues for all future requests to operate
package treatment plants that would be located in close proximity to tidal waters.
Please advise us as to any further actions that your Division will take in regard to
the permit application.
Sincerely,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
Attachments
cc: Interested Press and Citizens
NC Division of Coastal Management
Jonathan Howes, DEHNR
Joan Weld, Governor's Office
Rick Shiver, DEM

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
2�1IAY 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brian Wootton
THROUGH: Charles Stehman, Ph.D., P.G. GZD
FROM: Bruce Parris at
SUBJECT: Harker's Island Central System - Phase I
Review of Additional Information and Recent Modeling Performed by the Central
Office
Harker's Island
Tertiary Treatment WWTP - LPP Field
Carteret County
GW#96096/DEH#95-17
This memo is being written in regard to additional information for the subject site which has
been received by the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) Groundwater Section (GWS) and in
response to the predictive computer models which we received from you on May 1, 1996.
A review of the permit application package was previously conducted by the WiRO-GWS and
our comments were filed on May 19, 1995. The applicant had filed a package for review which
consisted of a tertiary treatment -wastewater treatment plant, and a total of 57,200 ft2 of LPP
fields. The proposed flow rate for the system was going to be 14,760 gpd in Phase I with
potential future expansions of up to 40,000 gpd. Based on the information contained in the
applicant's package, and on a site visit by WiRO personnel, the WiRO did not object to issuance
of the permit for Phase I. However, due to potential groundweLer.concerns, monitoring wells
were recommended to be installed at the review boundary at the site so that any groundwater
violations could be detected.
Since the May 19, 1995 review, additional information regarding potential groundwater impacts
at the site has been provided to the WiRO. Specifically, the WiRO-GWS received copies of two
correspondences written by the Coastal Federation on March 18, 1996 and April 2, 1996 which
detail their concerns with a waste disposal facility being constructed at the subject site. In
regard to groundwater, the Coastal Federation's concerns are primarily oriented around the
degradation of water quality and shellfrshing in the waters of a nearby tidal creek as a result of
contaminated groundwater discharging into the sound from the LPP field. Also contained in
Coastal Federation's letters was a statement that the subject site will be ultimately applying for

' Mr. Brian Wootton
May 3, 1996
Page Two
a discharge rate of 60,000 gpd with the potential for expansions. This is a significantly higher
discharge rate than the applicant's original package which proposed a discharge rate of 14,760
gpd with potential future amendments for increasing the discharge rate to 40,000 gpd.
Additionally, in response to the concerns of the Coastal Federation, you ran a computer model
to track nitrate concentrations in groundwater through time at the subject site. The models were
run under differing nitrate concentrations, with and without decay rates, so that a variety of
potential site conditions could be predicted. The modeling results indicate that a strong potential
for violations of 15A NCAC 2L nitrate concentrations at the subject site's compliance boundary
exist.
Based on the additional information and modeling predictions, the WiRO-GWS has concerns that
the facility would not be able to achieve 15A NCAC 2L groundwater standards at it's
compliance boundary. Since there were previous concerns of impacts to groundwater quality
at lower flow rates, the WiRO-GWS cannot recommend issuance of a permit for the facility.
CFS/brp
cc: WiRO-GWS Files
S:\GWS\PARRIS\PERMITS\HARKERSI.MEM
05/03/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environme
Health and Natural Resou e pp 11 1996 • •
Division of Environmental Ma19At5
`
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director ��.�
April 1o, 1996
c�
MEMORANDUM
To: William Jeter, Chief
On -Site Wastewater Engineering Br
Division of Environmental
dHealth
From: Steve W. Tedder, Chief II
Water Quality Section }(�
Subject: OSWS Project No. 95-17
Harker's Point Wastewater System
Harker's Island
Carteret County
Staff of the Water Quality Section have reviewed the subject project with respect to
concerns about potential adverse impacts to adjacent surface waters.
The proposed project's wastewater treatment and disposal system is a tertiary system that
should afford a high quality effluent. Although the effluent will not be denitrified, the
nitrate levels should notipose any adverse effect on surface water quality. Discussions with
the DEM's Groundwater staff indicate that the modeling runs conducted show that the
travel time to reach the nearest surface waters would be several months to approximately a
year based upon the site characteristics. It is also their opinion that the nitrate le: c :r�ui
be dissipated or attenuated due to the -movement of the effluent. through the subsurface
soils, the dilution and dispersion in the groundwater, and the dilution and dispersion in the
surface waters. Based upon these discussions and opinions, we do not object to the
proposed project.
We appreciate the opportunity to review the subject project. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Don Safrit, P.E.. Assistant Chief for Technical
Support at [phone], extension 519.
cc:-Wiliiiington- Regional Office'
Groundwater Section w
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled' 10% post -consumer paper