92-14 Amended 2014 Town of North Topsail Beach

Permit Class Permit Number
AMENDED 92-14
(by CRC Variance) STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN.A
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and COP
Coastal Resources Commission
-Permit
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Town of North Topsail Beach, 2008 Loggerhead Court, North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Authorizing development it.. Onslow Counbj at Atlarnc Ocean from 2276 to 2382 New River
Inlet Road as requested in the permittee's application, dated 9/26/14, Incl. attached workplans (4) 1-3
of 3 dated received onlO,17/14, 1 dated received 11/26/14, the email of 11/26,14 and AEC Hazard Notice dated iO/2/14.
This permit, issued on November 26, 2014 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) In keeping with the Variance granted by the Coastai Resource: Commission (CRC) on November 19.,
2014, and the CRC Variance Order signed by the CRC Chairman on November 24, 2014, the base
width of the authorized temporary erosicr control_ structures shall not exceed a base width of 45 feet,
and the height shall not exceed a crest elevation of 12 feet NAVD 88.
2) In keeping with the Variance granted by the CRC on November 19, 2014, and the Variance Order
signed by the CRC Chairman on November 24, 2014, petitioners are to begin construction on the
proposed development at the Site within six. (6) months of the oate of the final agency decision
granting the variance. If construction is not begun by May 21 v 2015; the variance granted by the
CRC, and this amended permit, will both be considered null and void.
(See attached sheet for Additional Condi*iems)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not coveree
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2017
In issuing this permit, the State of North Caiolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the an'.hor:'ty of the Secretary. of DENR and the
Cbainiia8 of the Ccastal Resources Commission.
Br-b(toff C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
Tais permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Town of North Topsail Beach Permit #92-14
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: T
dim sions of the authorized sandbag revetment structure shown on the attached drawing
date eceived in Morehead City on November 26, 2014 has been determined to be within the
limits of the sandbag revetment structure for which the CRC granted a variance on November 19,
2014. Any future request to expand the sandbag revetment structure beyond the dimensions
shown on the November 26, 2014 drawing will require additional coordination with the Division
of Coastal Management and/or the CRC.
3) Sandbags used to construct the temporary erosion control structures shall be tan in color and three to
five feet wide and seven to 15 feet long when measured flat.
4) In keeping with the Variance granted by the CRC on November 19, 2014, and the CRC Variance Order
signed by the CRC Chairman on November. 24, 2014, the temporary erosion control structures may
remain in place for up to eight years from November 25, 2014.
NOTE: The configuration of the individual sandbags may vary from that shown on the attached
workplan drawings, so long as the dimensions, alignment; and size requirements of Conditions 1
and 3 of this permit are not exceeded.
5) Soldier pilings and other types of devices to anchor the sandbags shall not be allowed.
6) Sand used to backfill cite sandbags shall be of t`..e s,�a1e ,.-eneral characteristics as the sand in the area in
which the material is to be placed, In order to ensure compliance with this requirement, the permittee
shall coordinate the location of the backfilibc.row s •urce with a repr.sentative. of the Division of
Coastal Management prior to initiation of anybackf Iling activities.
7) Once the temporary erosion control structure is determjned t9 be unnecessary due to relocation or
removal of the threatened structure, a storm protectitgu pr :je&, a beach nourishment project or an inlet
relocation project, it shall be removed by the permittee within 30 days of official notification by the
Division of Coastal Management regardless of the time liGnit placed on the temporary er >sion control
structure. However, removal of the authorized temporary erosion contro.' structures shall not be required
if they are covered by dunes with stable and natural vegetation. .
8) If the temporary erosion control structure, becomes nLmaged, try permittee shall be responsible for the
removal of remnants of all portions of the structure(q).
9) in order to reduce the possibility of unintended impacts to nesting sea turtles ana their nests, the
permittee is encouraged to expedite the authc-aed,,,,r6rk as mach as possible, to work only during
daylight hours, and 43 coordinate all authorized activities <, th existing sea turtle monitoring efforts in
the area.
10) There is the potential that work may occur during the sea turtle nesting window which tuns from 01
May to 15 November, or until the last known nest has anatched. To reduce the potential for any
unintended impacts to nesting sea turtles. slid their nests, should any work take place during the sea turtle
nesting window, the NC Wildlife Resources Commission requests that the work be expedited to the
greatest extent possible. All work should be ronducted during the daytime only and only begin after
qualified sea turtle monitors have evaluated the project area for any potential sea turtle nesting activities.

I -A
Town of North Topsail Beach
1�.
.Permit #92-14
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Temporary Construction Containment Tube
11) In accordance with commitments made by the perrmittee, the authorized temporary construction
containment tube used to assist in the safe construction of the authorized temporary sand bag revetment
shall be removed in its entirety either immediately upon proj ect completion, or by May 21, 2015,
whichever is sooner. Additionally, should the Division of Coastal Management determine that the
temporary construction containment tubes are no longer needogr are no longer serving their intended
purpose of providing a safe work environment landward of the tubes, the tubes shall be removed
immediately upon written notification by the Division.
12) The temporary construction containment tube shall be located immediately oceanward of the oceanward
most toe of the sandbag revetment structure. In no case shall the combined width of the sandbag
revetment and the temporary construction contzirunert tube exceed 45 feet.
13) The scour apron and "chock" tubes shall extend no farther oceanward than the oceanward toe of the
temporary construction containment tube All portions of the scour apron and chock tubes located
oceanward of the temporary sandbag revetment shall be removed in their entirety at the same time as the
associated temporary construction containment tubes.
General
] 4) The permittee and/or his or her contractor sbal .meet with'a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.
-NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any addjtional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required, including but not limited a permit from the US
Army Corps of Engineers. I .
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property. may -equire a modification of this permit.
Contact a reprsentative of the Division. at, (9 10 1 796-7315 prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination.

Permit Clgss Permit Number
AMENDED 92-14
(by CRC Variance) STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN.A
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
en. M it
for
X Major Development in anArea of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Town of North Topsail Beach, 2008 Loggerhead Court, North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Authorizing development in Onslow _ County at ABantic Ocean from 2276 to 2382 New River
Wet Road as requested in the permittee's application.. dared 9/26/14, incl attached work In ans (4) 1-3
of 3 dated received onlO!7/14 1 dated received 11/26/14, the email of 11/26A 4, and AEC Hazard Notice dated 10/2/14.
{
This permit, issued on November 26, 2014 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be nulland void.
1) In keeping with the Variance granted by the Coastal Resoirr•ce Commission. (CRC) on November 19,
2014, and the CRC Variance Order signed by the CRC Chairman on November 24, 2014. die base
width of the authorized temporary erosicn control structures sb: dl not exceed a base width of 45 feet,
and the height shall not exceed a crest elevation -of 12 feet NAND 88.
2) In keeping with the Variance granted by the CRC on November 19, 2014; and the Variance Order
signed by the CRC Chairman on November 24, 2014, petitioners are to begin construction on the
proposed development at the Site within six. (6) months of the aate of the final agency decision
granting the variance. If construction is not begun by May 21 y 2015, the variance granted by the
CRC, and this amended permit, will both be considered null and void.
(See attached sheet for Additional Canditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenc; (20) days of the issuing
date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2017
In issuing this permit, the State of Nor~h Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal.
Management Program.
by tne. anfhority of the Secretary. of DENR and the
E of the Coastal Resources Commission.
BrVtoff C. Davis, Director
Divisionof Coastal Management
Tnis permit and its conditions are hereby acrwted.
Signature of Permittee

Town of North Topsail Beach
Permit #5rl-fn- •.. ,
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL. CONDITIONS
NOTE: The dimensions of the authorized sandbag revetment structure shown on the attached drawing
dated Received in Morehead City onNovernber 26, 2014 has been determined to be within the
limits of the sandbag revetment structure for which the CRC granted a variance on November .19,
2014. Any future request to expand the sandbag revetment structure beyond the dimensions
shown on the November 26, 2014 drawing will require additional coordination with the Division
of Coastal Management and/or the'CRC.
3) Sandbags used to construct the temporary erosion control structures shall be tan in color and three to
five feet wide and seven to 15 feet long when measured flat.
4) In keeping with the Variance granted by the CRC on November 19, 2014, and the CRC Variance Order
signed by the CRC Chairman on November. 24, 2014, the temporary erosion control structures may
remain in place for. up to eight years from November 25, 2014.
NOTE: The configuration of the individual sandbags may vary from that shown on the attached
workplan drawings, so long as the dimensions, alignment; and size requirementg.of Conditions 1
and 3 of this permit are not exceeded.
5) Soldier pilings and other types of devices to anchor the sandbags shall not be allowed.
i) Sand used to backf ll ine sandbags shall be of r;?e wane general characteristics as the sand in the area in
which the material is fo be placed. In order to ensure compliance with this requirement, the permittee
-shall coordinate the location of the backfil' ocrrow si•urce with a repr sentative. of the Division of
Coastal Management prior to initiation of any'backf:lling. activities.
7) Once the temporary erosion control structure is determined tq be unnecessary due to relocation or
removal of the threatened structure, a storm protectipli pr Jeot, a beach nourishment project or an inlet
relocation project, it shall be removed by the permittee within 30 days of official notification by the
Division of Coastal Management regardless of the time li(n.it placed on the temporary er-)sion control
structure. However; removal of the authorized temporary erosion control. structures shall not be required
if they are covered by dunes with stable and. natural vegetation. .
8) ' If the temporary erosion control structure, becomes mmaged, we, permittee shall be responsible for the
removal of remnants of all portions of the structure( q`.
9) in order to reduce the possibility of unintended impacts to nesting sea turtles and their nests, the
. authorized -1Grk a mach as possible, to work only during
permittee is encouraged to expedite the
daylight hours, and t� coordinate all. authorized activities with existing sea turtle monitoring efforts in.
the area.
10) There is the potential that work may occur during the sea turtle nesting window which runs from 01
May to 15 November, or until the last known nest has hatched. To reduce the potential for any
unintended impacts to nesting sea turtles and their nests, should any, work take place during the'sea turtle
nesting window; the NC Wildlife Resources Comrnission-requests that the work be expedited to the
greatest extent possible. All work should be aonfiuctdd during the daytime only and only begin after
qualified sea turtle monitors have evaluated the projec: area for any potential sea turtle nesting activities.

Town'of forth Topsail Beach
,Permit #92-14
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL, CONDITIONS
Temporary Construction Containment Tube
11) In accordance with commitments made by the permittee, the authorized temporary construction
containment tube used to assist in the safe construction of the authorized temporary sand bag revetment
shall be removed in its entirety either immediately upon project completion, or by May 21, 2015,
whichever is sooner. Additionally, should the Division of Coastal Management determine that the
temporary construction containment tubes are no longer needed gr are no longer serving their intended
purpose of providing a safe work environment landward of the tubes, the tubes shall be removed
immediately upon written notification by the Division.
12) The Temporary construction containment tube shall be located immediately oceanward of the oceanward
most toe of the sandbag revetment structure.. -1n no case shall the combined width of the sandbag
revetment and the temporary construction containment tube exceed 45 feet.
13) The scour apron and "chock" tubes shall extend no farther oceanward than the oceanward toe of the
temporary construction containment tube All portions. of the scour apron and chock tubes located
oceanward of the temporary sandbag revetment shall be removed in their entirety at the same time as the
associated temporary construction containment tubes.
General
14) The permittee and/or !us or her contractor shad meet with a. represAntative .of the Division prior to
project initiation.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any add'tional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required, including but not limited a permit from the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
NOTE: Fuiure development of the permittee's property may -equire a modification of this permit.
Contact a .repnesentative of the Division. at (910). 796 �15 prior to the. commencement of any
such activ7iy for this determination.

9C11 MP-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Town of North Topsail Beach
Phase 1 Emergency Sandbag Revetment
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Stuart
Turille
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
N/A
N/A
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
2008 Loggerhead Court
N/A
North Topsail Beach
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
28460
Onslow
910-328-1349 ext.NA
N/A
Street Address (if different from above)
City
state
ZIP
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A -
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Coastal Planning & Engineering of NC, PC
Agent] Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
James
T.
Jarrett
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mailing Address
PO Box
city
State
4038 Masonboro Loop Rd
N/A
Wilmington
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28409
910-791-9494 ext.N/A
910-264-2166 ext.N/A
FAX No,
North Carolina Professional Engineering License
910-791-4129
005545
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
N/A
N/A
N/A
WA -
Email
[e-mail]
DECEIVED
OCT 07 7r1A
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
DCWMHDCIIv q F P 2 6 2014

3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State
Rd.#
Onslow
New River Inlet Rd
N/A
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Town of North Topsail Beach
NC
28460
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with
list)
910-328-1349 ext. N/A
N/A, ,
a. In which NC river basin Is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed
White Oak River Basin
project
New River Inlet and Atlantic Ocean
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the
®Natural []Manmade ❑Unknown
proposed project site.
New River Inlet and Atlantic Ocean
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city
®Yes []No
limit the proposed work falls within.
Town of North Topsail Beach
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
Approximately 1,450 feet.
198,200 sq ft (4.55 ac)
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW
N/A,
(normal high water) or NWL (normal water
I
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
level)
approximately+2 to +6 ft above NHW or
roughtly +4 to +8 ft NAVD88
e.
Vegetation on tract
No native dune grasses are present seaward of the erosion scarp line due to continuing erosion issues and past efforts
associated with Phase 1 of the beach management project. Sand fencing and dune vegetation were installed on the
artificial dune included in the beach fill design but the continuing erosion has destroyed almost all of the fencing and
grass. (Photo Nos. 3 to 5 in the attached Project Narrative).
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
There are currently 20 residential structures located along the ocean shoreline north of the Topsail Reef Condominiums.
New River Inlet Road is located immediately landward of the homes. The residential structures serve as both permanent
residences and rental properties.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacenl to the proposed project site.
The property immediately south of the proposed sand tube installation is occupied by the Topsail Reef Condominiums.
To the north, the area is undeveloped and bounded by New River Inlet. The Topsail Reef Condominiums are protected
by a sandbag revetment installed in 2012.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the
R-1 Residential
applicable zoning?
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []NO ❑NA
J.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. NA
RECEIVED
OCT O? 79M
DCfvj-mH,D CR1r
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 2 6 2014

I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a
[]Yes
®No ❑
National Register listed or eligible property?
NA
m. (1) Are there wetlands on the site?
[]Yes
®No
(it) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
❑Yes
®No
(III) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
❑Yes
[]No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial
❑Public/Govemment
®Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and dally operations of the project when complete.
The sand bag revetment will provide temporary erosion protection for 20 residential structures north of the Topsail Reef
Condominiums and some flood protection to a portion of New River Inlet Road north of Port Drive. Flooding in this area
is occurring during normal spring high tides due to wave over washing the beach (Photo No. 6 in the Attached Project
Narrative). A vicinity map, general layout of the proposed sand bag structure, and a typical cross-section of the
revetment is provided on Sheets 1 of 3 to 3 of 3 in the Attachments.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the
number of each type of equipment and where it is to be stored.
In order to achieve a design elevation of approximately +12 feet NAVD, the revetment will be built on top of the existing
grade at the time of construction in a stacked configuration of sand bags. The material needed to fill the sand bags will
be removed from the sand "spit" shown in Exhibit 1 in the Attachments and transported via dump trucks to designated
locations where a hopper, or large container, will be stationed. This sand will be supplemented with material from an off -
island borrow area as needed. The hopper and associated pumps and filling equipment will be stationed within the area
to be disturbed as identified in Figure B on Sheet 2 of 3 in the Attachments. As the sand bags are filled the hopper and
associated pumps used to create the slurry within the hopper will be moved. Multiple sand bags can be filled from one
hopper location; however, it is anticipated that the hopper and pumps will need to be moved as the work progresses. The
sand from the borrow site will be placed into the hopper. A pump will be used to draw water from the ocean and
discharge it into the hopper. The sand/water "slurry" in the hopper will then be pumped into the sand bags. No open "pit"
will be created as all of the pumping will be contained within the hopper and discharged into the sand bags. Prior to
filling the bags, bulldozers and frontend loaders will be used to grade the area prior to placement of the sand bags and
will maneuver the sand bags into position. All work will be performed above the NHW line. A temporary berm will be
formed on the seaward side of the work area and will provide a buffer from wave action. The existing material within the
footprint of where the sand bags will be placed will be used to create the berm. The temporary berm will also inhibit any
direct discharge of water from the work area back into the ocean. The bulldozer will be on standby during sand bag
placement and once the bags have been filled will be used to flatten out the temporary berm and final dress the area.
d. List all development activities you propose.
The single purpose of the project is to install the temporary sand bag revetment In the area fronting the 20 residential
structures north of the Topsail Reef Condominiums.
RECEIVED
OCT 077nii
DCM-MHD Clry
RECEIVED
JCM WILMINGTON, NC
S F P 2 6 2014

e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
New Work
A total of 15 sandbag structures have been installed along the north end of North Topsail
Beach north of Topsail Reef. Due to the erosion this area has experienced in recent years,
only three of the 15 sandbag structures that have been installed are currently in place in front
of existing residences. The remainder of the standard size sandbag structures permitted in
this area (3-2-1 stacked structure) have either been removed or were installed at residential
structures that were seaward of the current row of oceanfront homes and no longer exist.
Although there have been sandbag structures installed in this area in the past, 17 of the 20
residences proposed to be protected by the emergency sand bag revelment do not have
sandbag structures installed in front of them. The three remaining sandbag revetments,
located at 2332, 2334, and 2368 New River Inlet Rd. (State Rd. 1568) have been buried and
are not presently visible as discussed in the attached Project Narrative.
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
Approximately 8.6
The sand bag revetment would cover approximately 1,450 linear feet of ocean shoreline with
❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
a 50-toot wingwall or tieback on the north end (Sheet 2 of 3 in the Attachments). Installation
will disturb an area about 60 feet wide resulting in a total disturbed area of approximately 2.2
acres. Construction activities landward of the sand bags, i.e. placement and filling of hopper
between the existing residences and areas between residences and sand bags will disturb
approximately 1.4 acres. Excavation of material from the sand spit on the north end of the
island will disturb approximately 5.0 acres. The total disturbed area will be approximately 8.6
acres.
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public access way or other area
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
The sand bag structure will cover the area from the front of the 20 residential structures and
extend approximately 45 ft. seaward. This area is changing dramatically day to day but based
on the most recent survey data, the landward portion of the structure would be constructed at
an elevation ranging from 5.5 — 6.9 ft. NAVD; whereas the seaward edge would extend out to
elevations ranging from 0.7 — 5.2 ft. NAVD. The mean high water elevation is t1.4 ft. NAVD.
With the sand bag revetment installed (See Figure B on Sheet 2 of 3 in the Attachments) the
sand bags may extend seaward of the mean high water elevation of beach. Some of the
residences north of Topsail Reef presently impose some restrictions on public access during
times of high title. As a result, installation of the sand bag structure would not have a
significant incremental impact on public access in the project area at the time of high tide.
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A - No discharges will be made into state waters (see description of construction methodology in hem c).
I. Will wastewater or stormwaler be discharged into a wetland?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
[]Yes []No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
While there is no formal mitigation proposed for the sand bag revetment installation, the Town
of North Topsail Beach will continue to monitor the area with beach profile surveys associated
with its ongoing inletlbeach management plan. The Town expects to perform maintenance of
the new channel through New River Inlet in the next 2 to 2.5 years. At that time, some of the
dredged material could be used to provide beach nourishment in the sand bag project area.
Maintenance of the inlet channel will be predicated on satisfying conditions contained in DOA
permit SAW 2005-00344 and CAMA permit 79-10.
RECEIVED
OCT 07 7014
DCM-MHD CITY
i-itCEiVED
ACM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 262014

B. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order
for the application package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application.
Please consult the application instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative. (See attached)
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the
present status of the proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized wont, clearly indicate
on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish between work completed and proposed.
No work has been done at the site for this project. See Sheets 2 of 3 and 3 of 3 in the Attachments for the plan view of the
proposal and a typical cross-section, respectively. Sheet 2 of 3 shows both the site plan (Figure A) and the areas that
would likely be disturbed during construction (Figure B).
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the she. (See
Sheet 1 of 3 in the Attachments)
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected
properties. NIA
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts
as proof that such owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be
advised that they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management.
Name See Attached Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and
issuing dates.
Permittee: Town of North Topsail Beach (management plan) DOA Permit SAW-2005-00344
Permittee: Town of North Topsail Beach (management plan) CAMA Permit 79-10
Permittee: town of North Topsail Beach (Off -Island Truck Haut CAMA Permit 191-05 (As modified)
Operation)
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, If applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project
Involves expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North
Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that 1 am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to
this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. RECEIVED
Date . N4 X`21 'IT Print Name Stuart Turille
i 4Signature , �.a» + OCT 071014
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project. DCM-MHD CITY
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 2 6 2014

❑DCM MP4 Structures Information
Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental
information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in
feet.
Access
Other (excluding
Channel
Canal
Boat
Boat
Rock
Rock
shoreline
(NLW or
Basin
Ramp
Groin
Breakwater
stabilization)
NWL)
Length
Width
Avg.
Existing
NA
NA
Depth
Final
Project
NA
NA
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ❑
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or b. Type of material to be excavated.
NWL in cubic yards.
None
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If
any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these
areas:
N/A.
6
Beach sand and shell.
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
Between 14,000 and 17,000 cubic yards to fill
the sand bags. Material will be obtained from
a combination of the sand spit (approximately
10,000 cy) and material trucked in from an off
island source (up to 7,000 cy).
RECEIVED
OCT 07 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 2 6 2014

2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ®This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
Material excavated from a combination of the spit and the off- The approximate area to be covered by the
island borrow source will be used to fill sand bags to constmct sandbags will be 67,500 sq. ft. (1.55 acres).
the revetment Area covered = 1,500 ft long x 45 feet wide.
c. (1) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑NO ®NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
(i) Does the disposal area Include any coastal
wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If
any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feel affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
WA
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
(il) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the
water?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(if) If yes, how much water area is affected?
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Tvoe of shoreline stahilization h. I enath- 14Sn ft rhm a Sn-ft winnwall
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑ Width: Total approximately 45 feet.
Other: Geotextile Sand Bag revetment
c. Average distance walerward of NHW or NWL: 0 feet ( d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or
NWL: 7.1 ft.
e. Type of stabilization material
Two primary bag dimensions are proposed. Per the
manufacturers specifications, both bags, when filled, will
have widths of approximately 4 ft. and a filled height of
between 1.5 ft. and 2.0 ft. The difference in the two types of
bags proposed are their lengths, which are proposed to be
9 ft. and 14 ft., respectively. The revetment will be
constructed out of a combination of these bags to achieve a
base width not to exceed 45 ft. and an elevation of
approximately 12.0 ft. NAVD.
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water
level. NONE
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill _ Other geotextile sand
filled bags
I. Source of fill material.
Sand bags will be filled with a combination of sand
obtained from the surface of the sand spit located
(i) Has there been shoreline erosion during
preceding 12 months?
®Yes ❑No DNA
III) If yes, state amount of erosion and source
of erosion amount information.
Beach profile surveys taken in the area as
part of the Town of North Topsail Beach's
shoreline management program have
documented shoreline recession rates of
between 196 feet/year to 246 feet/year in
the area north of Topsail Reef since
completion of the Phase 1 beach
nourishment project in February 2013.
Examples of the profile surveys are
provided in Figures 2 and 3 in the Project
Narrative.
h. Type of fill material.
Geotextile bags filled with sand. RECEIVED
OCT 07 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 2 6 2014

adjacent to New River Inlet (see Exhibit 1 in the
Attachments) and an off -island borrow source. All
excavation of the material will be above the NHW line.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brouoht to the site? ®Yes ❑ b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal
No ❑NA
If yes,
(it) Amount of material to be placed in the water
None
(III) Dimensions of fill area
WA
(iv) Purpose of fill
To fill geotextile sand bags
wefiandstmarsh (CW), submerged aquatic
vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are
checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV _ ❑
SB _
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these
areas: To fill geotexdle sand bags
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
b. What type of construction equipment will be
erosion controlled?
used (e.g., dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
All fill brought to the site will be used to fill geotextile
dredge)?
sand bags. See explanation of construction
Bulldozer, dump trucks, frontend loader,
methodology in item c of DCM MP-1)
water pump.
c. (1) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting
project? equipment to project site? ❑Yes ®No
❑Yes ®No ❑NA DNA
(it) If yes, explain what type and how they will be (ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to
Implemented. avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
6.>otw
Date
Project Name
Phase 1 Emergency Sand Bag Revetment — North end North Topsail Beach
Applicant Name
Town of North Topsail Beach��.n..��,if(. `7'
Applicant Signature ✓��' " 1 Off` uwV�
s
RECEIv€B
OCT 07 M
DCM-MHD Cfly
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP262014

OCEAN HAZARD AEC NOTICE
Project Is in an: _zL Ocean Erodible Area ")� High Hazard Flood Area Inlet Hazard Area
Property Owner: I RL N 0
Property Address: N ' (2,Pt-4—
Date Lot Was Platted: N / #,
This notice is intended to make you, the applicant, aware of the
special risks and conditions associated with development in this
area, which is subject to natural hazards such as storms, erosion
and currents. The rules of the. Coastal Resources Commission
require that you receive an AEC Hazard Notice and
acknowledge that notice in writing before a permit for
development can be issued.
The Commission's rules on building standards, oceanfront
setbacks and dune alterations are designed to minimize, but not
eliminate, property loss from hazards. By granting permits, the
Coastal Resources Commission does not guarantee the safety of
the development and assumes no liability for future damage to
the development. Permits issued in the Ocean Hazard Area of
Environmental Concern include the condition that structures be
relocated or dismantled if they become imminently threatened
by changes in shoreline configuration. The structure(s) must be
relocated or dismantled within two (2) years of becoming
imminently threatened, and in any case upon its collapse or
subsidence.
The best available information, as accepted by the Coastal
Resources Commission, indicates that the annual long-term
average ocean erosion rate for the area where your property is
located is _ �X_ feet per year.
The rate was established by careful analysis of aerial
photographs of the coastline taken over the past 50 years.
Studies also indicate that the shoreline could move as much as
t4 S�* feet landward in a major storm.
The flood waters in a major storm are predicted to be about
J±('&feet deep in this area.
Preferred oceanfront protection measures are beach nourishment
and relocation of threatened structures. Hard erosion control
structures such as bulkheads, seawalls, revetments, groins, jetties
and breakwaters are prohibited. Temporary sand bags may be
authorized under certain conditions.
The applicant must acknowledge this information and
requirements by signing this notice in the space below. Without
the proper signature, the application will not be complete.
J":& Oct a aO1y
Property Owner Signature Date
Tow Ak&v -)el')
r nor' f-4k
SPECIAL NOTE: This hazard notice is required for
development in areas subject to sudden and massive storms and
erosion. Permits issued for development in this area expire on
December 31 of the third year following the year in which the
permit was issued. Shortly before work begins on the project
site, the Local Permit Officer must be contacted to determine the
vegetation line and setback distance at your site. If the property
has seen little change since the time of permit issuance, and the
proposed development can still meet the setback requirement,
the LPO will inform you that you may begin work. Substantial
progress on the project must be made within 60 days of this
setback determination, or the setback must be re -measured. Also,
the occurrence of a major shoreline change as the result of a
storm within the 60-day period will necessitate re -measurement
of the setback. It is important that you check with the LPO
before the permit expires for official approval to continue the
work after the permit has expired. Generally, if foundation
pilings have been placed and substantial progress is continuing,
permit renewal can be authorized. It is unlawful to continue
work after permit expiration.
For more information, contact.
Local Permit Officer
MZ 1_ (Av
FUN )
tN r �_ pt,\, #VC_
Locality
-((U —7ga
Phone Number
RECEIVED
dCM WILMINGTON, NC
O C T U S 2014 RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 1014
DCM-MHD CfIV
Revised May 2010

tv
E
t 'V1,wl:
41
�\ � 1? ` �NOltfi'STdp 6$il
Holy R4ag
h
l urfc11V
WO dRJ Wl.n u5 yuay rvG.,flbCO
G 304 GooB�e
]e 3f e856•N :]-13'26 i2'Wnlnr 511

Attachment 3: Sheet 2 of 3
1 igare A. Plan view of sand bat revetment
r `
i � t
t
' � Eumoe c e.. o�uue is pr
RECEIVED
Figure B. Plan view of sand bag revetment footprint, proposed area to be disturbed,
transition to Topsail Reef revetment and location of the First Line of Stable Natural OCT 07 2014
Vegetation (FLSNV).
DCM-MHD CITY
22
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 2 6 2014

1■■■■■
■m
1■■11■■■■■■
1.
■
11■
1
11'ro
m
IIMENVEN:
I
ilroolmillon
ME
■■u■m
n
191111111
glo
1.
Ill
1■
t
1
l
rww
l
fil"Ill",
I
no
.I
N
RECEIVED
OCT 0 71014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
S E P 262014

C
"tot i 7
u
z
llV : B 4'A w
A�
AM z {i
a �
0 6
m V RR
SF
15 _...... ...... _._. _......_ .._...._..... ....... ... DO'. MAX _.. _.. _..
i EXISTING PROFILE TEMPCONTORARY
.... _... _........ ..... ...... .. TUBE h SCOUR...
10 __.... _.. _... _.. _....... ............__... ....... .. n._... _..
o + SYSTEM
Tm EL. +6.7' NAVD
....... 7 .....tY.... .
--z.rru
-90 -E0 -70 -60 -50 -10 -30 -20 -10 0
JO FT SCOUR (• r
d DISTANCE FROM BASEUNE (FEET)APRON CHOCK BAG
15 FT SCOUR ROLL PREVENTION !
APRON
�FcfNfQ
s ago
d
XS-1

Howell, Jonathan
From: Willson, Kenneth <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
To: 'Stuart Turille'; Huggett, Doug
Cc: Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Jarrett, James; Howell,
Jonathan; 'Brian Edes' ([e-mail]); clan tuman (ntopsail@charter. net);
[e-mail]; Rosov, Brad
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Attachments: RAI Response CPE-NC November 25 2014_ pdf
Importance: High
Stuart,
Please see the e-mail below from Mr. Doug Huggett with the Division of Coastal Management requesting additional
information regarding the construction methods and means proposed for the North Topsail Beach North End Sand Bag
Revetment Project, which include the use of a temporary geotextile containment tube. CPENC has drafted the attached
letter describing the details of the use of the temporary containment tube as well as an updated drawing.
Please respond directly to the DCM regarding their request for a commitment by the Town to remove the construction
tubes immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized bags. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
Doug,
Please find a letter attached with the below requested information. Please let me know if yolI
information.
Kind Regards,
Ken
From: Huggett, Doug rmailto:doug.huggettC&ncdenr.govl `
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:36 PM
To: Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Huggett, Do
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Tom
Yes, we need the detail on what you described below, especially as it relates to temporary construction bag
size/dimension, location relative to the toe of the authorized oversized sandbag structure, and a solid commitment by
the Town to remove the construction bags immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized
bags.
We have discussed internally, and we believe that we need to add this to the variance permit we were ready to issue
today (less than two hours after getting the variance order from the CRC Chairman), so we are going to hold off on that
issuance until we get the additional info. However, with the holidays (and associated travel plans) upon us, we need the
additional info in to us no later than lunch time tomorrow (Tuesday) so we can get this done this week. Otherwise it
could be Monday of next week before we can finalize this.
I hope this makes sense. If not, e-mail me or call me.

Thanks and good luck
Doug
From: Jarrett, James rmailto:James.JarrettCnlcbi.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Huggett, Doug; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Subject: FW: Temporary construction measures
FYI
This is the message I sent to our folks.
Did I leave anything out? We will get you something by tomorrow morning. According to Ken, they plan to place the
tube within the 45-foot corridor. That should be reflected in the drawing (sketch).
If you need something else just respond to ALL
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Jarrett, James
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Cc: Brian Edes (BrianE(a cmclawfirm.com)
Subject: Temporary construction measures
Talked with Doug Huggett and Jonathan regarding use of temporary sand tube. They need the following:
A drawing or sketch of the.proposed sand tube
How far waterward will it be placed
The sand source for filling the tube
The method to remove the tube when done.
They wanted to issue the variance today but will wait on our input and try and work that into the new permit. Might
have to submit a minor permit mod by not sure about that.
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

This e-mail and any attached files may contain CB&I (or its affiliates) confidential and privileged information.
This information is protected by law and/or agreements between CB&I (or its affiliates) and either you, your
employer or any contract provider with which you or your employer are associated. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail; further, you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited.

Photo 2.
Photo 3.
Following the construction of the temporary containment tube, the sand bag revetment will be constructed on top
of the scour apron and immediately landward of the containment rube as shown in the attached drawing. The total
footprint of the sand bag revetment and temporary containment tube will not exceed a total footprint of 45-feet
To be clear, the containment tube WILL NOT be placed seaward of the 45 ft wide footprint proposed in the
permit application. The sand bag revetment will be constructed to an approximate height of 7.5 to 9.0 ft. above
grade. The nominal dimension of the bags measured flat will be 5 feet in width. Lengths of bags can vary from 7.5
4038 MASONBORO LOOP ROAD, WILMINGTON, NC 28409 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX [phone]
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

Huggett, Doug
From:
Willson, Kenneth <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
To:
'Stuart Turille'; Huggett, Doug
Cc:
Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Jarrett, James; Howell,
Jonathan; 'Brian Edes' ([e-mail]); dan tuman ([e-mail]);
[e-mail]; Rosov, Brad
Subject:
RE: Temporary construction measures
Attachments:
RAI Response CPE-NC November 25 2014_ pdf
Importance: High
Stuart,
Please see the e-mail below from Mr. Doug Huggett with the Division of Coastal Management requesting additional
information regarding the construction methods and means proposed for the North Topsail Beach North End Sand Bag
Revetment Project, which include the use of a temporary geotextile containment tube. CPENC has drafted the attached
letter describing the details of the use of the temporary containment tube as well as an updated drawing.
Please respond directly to the DCM regarding their request for a commitment by the Town to remove the construction
tubes immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized bags. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
Doug,
Please find a letter attached with the below requested information. Please let me know if you need any additional
information.
Kind Regards,
Ken
From: Huggett, Doug rmailto:doug.huggett@ ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:36 PM
To: Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; D.
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Tom
Yes, we need the detail on what you described below, especially as it relates to temporary construction bag
size/dimension, location relative to the toe of the authorized oversized sandbag structure, and a solid commitment by
the Town to remove the construction bags immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized
bags.
We have discussed internally, and we believe that we need to add this to the variance permit we were ready to issue
today (less than two hours after getting the variance order from the CRC Chairman), so we are going to hold off on that
issuance until we get the additional info. However, with the holidays (and associated travel plans) upon us, we need the
additional info in to us no later than lunch time tomorrow (Tuesday) so we can get this done this week. Otherwise it
could be Monday of next week before we can finalize this.

I hope this makes sense. If not, e-mail me or call me.
Thanks and good luck
Doug
From: Jarrett, James [mailto:James.Jarrett(Ocbi.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Huggett, Doug; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Subject: FW: Temporary construction measures
FYI
This is the message I sent to our folks.
Did I leave anything out? We will get you something by tomorrow morning. According to Ken, they plan to place the
tube within the 45-foot corridor. That should be reflected in the drawing (sketch).
If you need something else just respond to ALL
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Jarrett, James
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Cc: Brian Edes (BrianE(a cmclawfirm.com)
Subject: Temporary construction measures
Talked with Doug Huggett and Jonathan regarding use of temporary sand tube. They need the following:
A drawing or sketch of the proposed sand tube
How far waterward will it be placed
The sand source for filling the tube
The method to remove the tube when done.
They wanted to issue the variance today but will wait on our input and try and work that into the new permit. Might
have to submit a minor permit mod by not sure about that.
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

This e-mail and any attached files may contain CB&I (or its affiliates) confidential and privileged information.
This information is protected by law and/or agreements between CB&I (or its affiliates) and either you, your
employer or any contract provider with which you or your employer are associated. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail; further, you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited.

COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
4038 MASONBORO LOOP ROAD, WLMINGTON, NC 28409 910-791-9494 PHONE [phone] FAX
November 25, 2014
Mr. Doug Hugget
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: Construction Methods for North Topsail Beach North End Sand Bag Revetment Project
Dear Mr. Huggett,
This letter is in response to your e-mail request for additional information dated November 24, 2014 regarding means
and methods to be used to construct the North Topsail Beach, North End Sand Bag Revetment Project. Please find
the requested additional information including a drawing of the proposed construction cross section.
After observing the continued rapid deterioration of the project area after sea conditions on November 23�d and
24d' (See photos below), a decision was made between the Town, CPE-NC, and the contractor to modify the
original design to use a temporary geotextile containment tube to stabilize the project area. In order to allow for
construction of the sand bag revetment, a geotextile containment tube will be filled and placed on top of the scour
apron and seaward of the proposed sand bag revetment location in order to provide temporary protection to the
work area. The nominal dimensions of the temporary containment tube will be 30 ft. in circumference. The tube is
expected to achieve a height of approximately 5 to 6 ft and a width of 12 ft. Individual tubes will range in length
from 100 to 200 ft. The purpose of the containment tube is two -fold. 1) The temporary structure will allow for a
safer work environment landward of the tube, which will expedite the installation of the sand bag revetment. 2)
The temporary structure will stabilize the chronic erosion currently threatening both the foundations of the houses
and the property between the landward side of the houses and the road.
Photo 1
4038 MASONBORO LOOP ROAD, WILMINGTON, NC 28409 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX [phone]
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

Photo 2.
sniaill1aA ...
Photo 3
Following the construction of the temporary containment tube, the sand bag revetment will be constructed on top
of the scour apron and immediately landward of the containment tube as shown in the attached drawing. The total
footprint of the sand bag revetment and temporary containment tube will not exceed a total footprint of 45-feet.
To be clear, the containment tube WILL NOT be placed seaward of the 45 ft. wide footprint proposed in the
permit application. The sand bag revetment will be constructed to an approximate height of 7.5 to 9.0 ft. above
grade. The nominal dimension of the bags measured flat will be 5 feet in width. Lengths of bags can vary from 7.5
4038 MASONBORO LOOP ROAD, WILMINGTON, NC 28409 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX [phone]
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

ft. in length (minimum) to 15 ft. in length (maximum), measured flat. All bags will have an approximate height,
when filled, of approximately 1.5 ft. While the sand bag revetment is being constructed, the area landward of the
revetment will be backfilled with beach compatible sand to provide support and stability to the revetment.
The re -designed configuration of the sand bag revetment, including the temporary containment tube will require
less sand than the original sand bag revetment No additional sand sources will be needed to construct the project.
Upon completion of the project, the temporary containment tube will be removed. Removal of the tube will be
accomplished by cutting through the geotextile fabric along the seaward base of the tube. The top of the tube will
then be pulled back and secured so that the sand inside is exposed. Over the course of several days, based on sea
conditions, the wave action will scour out the sand and redistribute it within the littoral system. Once the sand is
sufficiently removed from the tube, a land, based long reach excavator will be used to lift the geotextile fabric out of
the water and dispose of it. Upon removal of the temporary containment tube, the Town may elect to place
additional sand bags within the permitted footprint to achieve a cross section comparable to the original design.
Please contact me at 910.791.9494 (office) or 910.443.4471 (cell) should you have any questions or need additional
information.
Very truly yours,
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Kenneth Willson
Project Manager
4038 MASONBORO LOOP ROAD, WILMINGTON, NC 28409 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX [phone]
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

COMB PROFU
0 .... ..... ..... ......... ..... .. ..... ...
c iFYPOAARY
EE a&>'vnvD CWTANM17
6 .... .. o �- .... 17 .....
_ _ s.s ANaoR TueE
R _1n n
----
DISTANCE FRW D. W (FEEN
STATION 1150+00
0 10 20 b
W SO
60 JO
BD 80
DISTANCE FRW BAYL.K (FUM
STATION 1155+00
E
LEGENn:
i
-------- EKISRNG PROFILE
CONSTRUCRON
Rix
BACK FILLET
Z
1. VERiICAL DATUM IS IN FEET BASED ON NAVD 198&
2Z6 a
2 EIEVAEIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE BASED ON
SURVEYS PERFORMED IN DUNE AND NOVEMBER 201Z AN
UPDATED PRE-CQNSTRUCRON SURVEY MILL BE
PERFORMED AS PART OF TITS CONTRACT. SEE TECHNICAL
xrc xa
-21 -10 0 ID 20 BD NU 60 60 ID 60 SPECIFICARONS - 124.
L5 t,0 Q = 5 10 DISTANCE FRW BA4LNE (11£D
® ��S sranoN nso+oo—�
HORIZ. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT VERY. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT

Huqqett, Dou
From: Stuart Turille <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:59 PM
To: 'Willson, Kenneth'; Huggett, Doug
Cc: 'Priest, Adam T.'; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; 'Jarrett, James'; Howell,
Jonathan; "Brian Edes'; 'clan tuman'; [e-mail]; 'Rosov, Brad'; 'Carin
Faulkner'
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures--NTB
Attachments: Flooding--NTB Photo 3, November 24, 2104jpg; Photo 1 from November 24, 2014 jpg;
Flooding November 24, 2014--Photo-2jpg
Mr. Huggett:
Based on conditions at the project area, our engineers and selected contractor recommended that, in order to
construct
our project in the most timely fashion, a temporary geotextile tube containment should be used to secure the site.
It is the Town's intention to remove this temporary measure upon completion of the project.
FYI —Regarding the use of the tube: attached are photos from yesterday's storm.
Stuart Turille
Town Manager
North Topsail Beach
From: Willson, Kenneth[mallto:[e-mail])
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
To: Manager; Huggett, Doug
Cc: Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan; 'Brian Edes'
([e-mail]); dan tuman ([e-mail]); [e-mail]; Rosov, Brad
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Importance: High
Stuart,
Please see the e-mail below from Mr. Doug Huggett with the Division of Coastal Management requesting additional
information regarding the construction methods and means proposed for the North Topsail Beach North End Sand Bag
Revetment Project, which include the use of a temporary geotextile containment tube. CPENC has drafted the attached
letter describing the details of the use of the temporary containment tube as well as an updated drawing.
Please respond directly to the DCM regarding their request for a commitment by the Town to remove the construction
tubes immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized bags. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
Doug,
Please find a letter attached with the below requested information. Please let me know if you need any additional
information.

Kind Regards,
Ken
From: Huggett, Doug [mailto:doua.huggettC&ncdenr.00vl
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:36 PM
To: Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Huggett, Doug
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Tom
Yes, we need the detail on what you described below, especially as it relates to temporary construction bag
size/dimension, location relative to the toe of the authorized oversized sandbag structure, and a solid commitment by
the Town to remove the construction bags immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized
bags.
We have discussed internally, and we believe that we need to add this to the variance permit we were ready to issue
today (less than two hours after getting the variance order from the CRC Chairman), so we are going to hold off on that
issuance until we get the additional info. However, with the holidays (and associated travel plans) upon us, we need the
additional info in to us no later than lunch time tomorrow (Tuesday) so we can get this done this week. Otherwise it
could be Monday of next week before we can finalize this.
I hope this makes sense. If not, e-mail me or call me.
Thanks and good luck
Doug
From: Jarrett, James rmailto:James.JarrettCabcbi.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Huggett, Doug; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Subject: FW: Temporary construction measures
FYI
This is the message I sent to our folks.
Did I leave anything out? We will get you something by tomorrow morning. According to Ken, they plan to place the
tube within the 45-foot corridor. That should be reflected in the drawing (sketch).
If you need something else just respond to ALL
A
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

From: Jarrett, James
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Cc: Brian Edes (BrianEAcmclawfirm.com)
Subject: Temporary construction measures
Talked with Doug Huggett and Jonathan regarding use of temporary sand tube. They need the following:
A drawing or sketch of the proposed sand tube
How far waterward will it be placed
The sand source for filling the tube
The method to remove the tube when done.
They wanted to issue the variance today but will wait on our input and try and work that into the new permit. Might
have to submit a minor permit mod by not sure about that.
7crr
r r ,.�J
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
This e-mail and any attached files may contain CB&I (or its affiliates) confidential and privileged information.
This information is protected by law and/or agreements between CB&I (or its affiliates) and either you, your
employer or any contract provider with which you or your employer are associated. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail; further, you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited.

Huggett, Doug
_
From:
Willson, Kenneth <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:51 AM
To:
Huggett, Doug; Howell, Jonathan; Wilson, Debra
Cc:
Priest, Adam T.; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Jarrett
'[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'; Rosov, Brad;
'[e-mail]'
Subject:
RE: Temporary construction measures
Attachments:
152841-Sand Bag NEW Design Profile with Parallel 5x15.pdf
Doug/Jonathan/Debbie,
Thanks again for all of the time and effort you and your staff have put into this project. I can assure you that those of us
involved realize the lengths that DCM and the CRC have gone to in order to get us to this point. Again, I want to
reiterate that all of the adaptations that we have made to take this project to construction have been made in good faith
that we were complying with the spirit of the rules and policies of DCM. I submit that some of the confusion resulted
from a lack of clarity on my part as to where discretion in the "methods and means" to construct a project ends. In the
future we will be quick to discuss any potentially controversial methods and means to construct a project with Division
staff.
Earlier this week when we recommended the modified structure, we believed that as long as we didn't construct a
structure that exceeded the original footprint, it would be agreeable to the Division. We fully understand the Divisions
concerns with extending the scour apron seaward of both the sand bag revetment and the temporary containment
tubes. With regards to the anchor tubes, I read permit condition #4, which reads: Soldier pilings and other types of
devices to anchor the sand bags shall not be allowed, to apply more to the sand bags, than holding the scour apron in
place. We now clearly understand the Division's objection to the anchor tube concept.
The Town and property owners are presented with a difficult scenario, where in order to stabilize the area in a timely
manner so as to prevent the loss of a structure, they are going to spend a significant portion of the money allocated for
the sand bag structure on a temporary measure (containment tube). It is our belief that this temporary containment
tube will; 1) allow for a safer work environment landward of the tube, which will expedite the installation of the sand
bag revetment; and 2) will temporarily (i.e. 6-monnths or until the sand bag revetment can be constructed, whichever is
less) stabilize the chronic erosion currently threatening both the foundations of the houses and the property between
the landward side of the houses and the road. This is a costly measure to buy time enough to install a permissible sand
bag revetment without losing structures. Moving forward with the temporary containment tube to "stop the bleeding"
will result in a reduction in both the width and height of the sand bag structure the Town can afford.
After our conversation Tuesday afternoon, CPE-NC staff contacted the contractors to brief them on the agreed upon
conditions. The contractors voiced some concern about the stability of the temporary containment tube in the absence
of the extended scour apron and anchor tube. More specifically, the contractors were concerned that the temporary
containment tube may be undermined and or roll while in place. This could result in both a loss of the functionality of
the temporary tube and or an inability to retrieve the entirety of the material at the time of removal. Likewise, the
contractors were concerned that if the scour apron were to be cut back to the front of the sand bag revetment when the
temporary containment tube is removed, the front of the revetment could be in jeopardy of slumping.
In order to address their concerns we are proposing a slightly modified cross section from the one submitted in the
letter dated 11/25/14. The new cross section (See Attached) is a modified version of the cross section for Station
1150+00. The revised cross section included in the attached drawing widens the sand bag revetment base to 30 feet by
using 2 — 5' x 15' bags stacked perpendicular to shore on the bottom layer. On the second Layer we have included an

extra shore parallel bag to help with added stability on the landward side. The temporary containment tube will still be
placed within the original 45 ft. wide footprint and will be underlain by a scour apron. We are also proposing to use a
series of 18 inch diameter "chock Bags" to prevent the sand tube from rolling seaward as well as prevent excessive scour
to occur under the temporary containment tube. The chock bags are 15' in length as opposed to a continuous tube. The.
contractor has recommended this as a secondary option to the anchor tubes and extended scour apron.
As discussed yesterday, we would still agree to remove the sand tube upon completion of the project or 6 months,
whatever is less. We would also remove the chock bags at that time. We would also agree to remove the scour apron
seaward of the seaward toe of the sand bag revetment after the temporary containment tube is removed.
I realize we are all chasing a moving target and the frustration that occurs when you believe you are about to put this
thing to bed and something else comes up. That's exactly what we've been dealing with for 4 + months with the project
area. Again, we sincerely appreciate all of your patience and your ability to work with us through very difficult
times. Please feel free to contact me on my cell phone if you have any questions about this information. If need be we
can assemble in short order for a conference call.
Sincere Regards,
h�rq�
h
,r.� I S�
Ken Willson
Client Program Manager 1
Coastal, Ports & Marine.
Environmental & Infrastructure
Tel: + 1 910 791 9494
Cell: + 1910 443 4471
Fax: + 1910 7914129
Kenneth. W➢IsonGpCB I.com
CB&I
4038 Masonboro Loop Road
Wilmington, NC 28409
USA
v .CBI.com
From: Rosov, Brad
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:37 PM
To: Willson, Kenneth; '[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'
Cc: Priest, Adam T.; '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'; Jarrett, James;
'[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'; 'ntopsail@charter. net'; '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Jonathan, Tom, and Ken -
Please call in to a conference call with Adam and I at 4pm today. The call in information is as follows:
Call in #: 1866-692-3158
Password: 5711420#
Thank you,

Scientist IV
Coastal, Ports & Marine
Environmental & Infrastructure
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
brad. rosov(aDCBI.com
CB&I
4038 Masonboro Loop Rd.
Wilmington, NC 28409
United States
www.CBI.com
From: Willson, Kenneth
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:32 PM
To: doug.huggett(§lncdenr.gov; townmanacier(@north-topsail-beach.org
Cc: Priest, Adam T.; debra.wilson(ftcdenr ciov; braxton.davis(&ncdenr.gov; iason.dail(abncdenr.00v; Jarrett, James;
ionathan.howell(alncdenr.gov; briane(Ocmclawfirm.com; ntopsail(alcharter.net; tom.leonardntb ahoo.com; Rosov, Brad
Subject: Re: Temporary construction measures
We'll be in touch with you shortly to setup a conference call.
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
----- Reply message -----
From: "Huggett, Doug" <doug.huggettna ncdenr.gov>
Date: Tue, Nov 25, 2014 3:20 pm
Subject: Temporary construction measures
To: "Willson, Kenneth" <Kenneth.WillSonPcbi.eom>,
"&apos;Stuart Turille&apos;" <townmanaeer@north-
topsail-beach.org>
Cc: "Priest, Adam T." <adam.priest2cbi.com>, "Wilson, Debra" <debra.wilson2ncdenr.gov>, "Davis, Braxton
C" <[e-mail]>, "Dail, Jason" <[e-mail]>, "Jarrett, James"
<[e-mail]>, "Howell, Jonathan" <ionathan.howellQncdenr.gov>, "&apos;Brian Edes&apos;
(briane@a,cmclawfirm.com)" <briane2cmclawfrrm.com>, "dan tuman ([e-mail])"
<[e-mail]>, "tom.leonardntbna vahoo.com" <tom.leonardntb(c yahoo.com>, "Rosov, Brad"
<[e-mail]
Ken/Brad/Tom
We have some significant questions about this proposed change. It appears that this is a more significant redesign of
the proposal that received a variance than what we discussed yesterday. I think we need to have a conference call on
this as soon as possible. Jonathan is in through the end of the day today, and I will be in tomorrow (I am in participating
in mediation conference on a permit appeal right now). Please call one of us as soon as possible to discuss.
Thanks
Doug
From: Willson, Kenneth rmailto:Kenneth.Willson(ocbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
To: 'Stuart Turille'; Huggett, Doug

Cc: Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan; 'Brian Edes'
([e-mail]); clan tuman (ntopsail(alcharter.net); [e-mail]; Rosov, Brad
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Importance: High
Stuart,
Please see the e-mail below from Mr. Doug Huggett with the Division of Coastal Management requesting additional
information regarding the construction methods and means proposed for the North Topsail Beach North End Sand Bag
Revetment Project, which include the use of a temporary geotextile containment tube. CPENC has drafted the attached
letter describing the details of the use of the temporary containment tube as well as an updated drawing.
Please respond directly to the DCM regarding their request for a commitment by the Town to remove the construction
tubes immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized bags. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
Doug,
Please find a letter attached with the below requested information. Please let me know if you need any additional
information.
Kind Regards,
Ken
From: Huggett, Doug fmailto:douo.huggettCla ncdenr.cI
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:36 PM
To: Jarrett, James; Howell, Jonathan
Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.; Wilson, Debra; Davis, Braxton C; Dail, Jason; Huggett, Doug
Subject: RE: Temporary construction measures
Tom
Yes, we need the detail on what you described below, especially as it relates to temporary construction bag
size/dimension, location relative to the toe of the authorized oversized sandbag structure, and a solid commitment by
the Town to remove the construction bags immediately upon completion of construction of the authorized oversized
bags.
We have discussed internally, and we believe that we need to add this to the variance permit we were ready to issue
today (less than two hours after getting the variance order from the CRC Chairman), so we are going to hold off on that
issuance until we get the additional info. However, with the holidays (and associated travel plans) upon us, we need the
additional info in to us no later than lunch time tomorrow (Tuesday) so we can get this done this week. Otherwise it
could be Monday of next week before we can finalize this.
I hope this makes sense. If not, e-mail me or call me.
Thanks and good luck
Doug
From: Jarrett, James [mailto•James.Jarrett(abcbi.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Huggett, Doug; Howell, Jonathan

Cc: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Subject: FW: Temporary construction measures
FYI
This is the message I sent to our folks.
Did I leave anything out? We will get you something by tomorrow morning. According to Ken, they plan to place the
tube within the 45-foot corridor. That should be reflected in the drawing (sketch).
If you need something else just respond to ALL
D
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Jarrett, James
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Willson, Kenneth; Priest, Adam T.
Cc: Brian Edes (BrianEOcmclawfirm.com)
Subject: Temporary construction measures
Talked with Doug Huggett and Jonathan regarding use of temporary sand tube. They need the following:
A drawing or sketch of the proposed sand tube
How far waterward will it be placed
The sand source for filling the tube
The method to remove the tube when done.
They wanted to issue the variance today but will wait on our input and try and work that into the new permit. Might
have to submit a minor permit mod by not sure about that.
Tom Jarrett, P.E.
Mgr Engrg II
Coastal, Ports and Marine
Tel: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
This e-mail and any attached files may contain CB&I (or its affiliates) confidential and privileged information.
This information is protected by law and/or agreements between CB&I (or its affiliates) and either you, your
employer or any contract provider with which you or your employer are associated. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail; further, you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited.

1
O
Q
ELEVA71OR (FEET NAVD)
O N
O
1
m
0
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
m
�
1
N
Z
11
Z
I
9
0
0
I'
J
I
r23r
m
O
1
'
I
I
1
RNG.—0+68.0
I
m
I
I
�W
O N
y O
`I NG.—0+42.2
fll
O
L
ym
N
4
e a
z o
m
W
o
w
�
o
m
I
OMw
r X
oco
m
z'm
V
Z
<D
f
N N O
I
RNG.—0+77.3
DN
w0
iz
o
I
I
I
I
N
G!
N
I
o
j
i
RmZA
VoD
]I0
F0
0
A2
o
-UN
C:ti
m
I
0
0
2
q
g
xmm 1GPSUL Idol, xe
°�°'
--
Co"T" Puxeoxo & ENGINEERING
w
--
5
7mvmAar sum nmE PE\£1xFN1'
a N..0 C.mnllx, IxG.
N ..x
SANG BAG REV1— !
IEYPgtARTCIX7UMI NBE
Iweewweosolmv �. ex...).. e
nmclNO mate
M-gLRIX15
vmaunmoR nc>eloe

DCM Coordinator: `V)\,Oe�`�
Permit,# ) — %
MAILING DISTRIBUTION SHEET
Permitee:
DCM Field Offices
Elizabeth City
Morehead City /
Was : y5 V
ilmmgton
US ACOE Offices:
(with revised work plan drawings)
Washington: Raleigh Bland
Wilmington: Tyler Ia
Cultural Resources: Renee Gledhill -Early or ( [e-mail]) \
Public Water Supply: he Williams (WIRO ✓
Joey i
NC DOT:
� e=a�
Shellfish Sanitation:
atti Fo
State Property:
im Walto
Water Resources:
en Higgins (Ralei
Jo en T)
Washington:
Anthony Scarborough
Wilmington:
J tcenhuis — O1
Chad Coburn - 401
Linda Lewis - Stormwater
Wildlife Resources:
Ma�(WARO)
LPO:
Fax Distribution: Permitee #:
Agent #:_

/wd
tz aa.r ruw
TIREANYpT
a
-b m _10 n1BE qa '
gSi.WCE f . 8AIl .E (Rj
STATION 1150+00
¢. anz xzw
v 19 m b w IN m >o m m
pHIANC: EPCY y¢NIE ({FE11
STATION 1155+00
�L7
%uj 4-&s
L r amµ /6acj�i�1
LESitI�
________ E%ISIINL %2Mlf
tz aa.r ruw
TIREANYpT
a
-b m _10 n1BE qa '
gSi.WCE f . 8AIl .E (Rj
STATION 1150+00
¢. anz xzw
v 19 m b w IN m >o m m
pHIANC: EPCY y¢NIE ({FE11
STATION 1155+00
�L7
%uj 4-&s
L r amµ /6acj�i�1
LESitI�
________ E%ISIINL %2Mlf
F
� •�
aNsmucnoN
6
_BACK FlLL
.��
NOTES.
m�
1. YFRTICAL IS IN fTET BA NAVE 19m.
S SHOWN NS M
3. ELEVATIONS SHONN ON THE PLANS ARE BASED ON
S.R?VEYSPER-CWS IN .NNE AND N04E1 2012 AN
DAM S
nPD WIW PRE-CONSTRW THIS WN7 WILL EE
PERFORMED AS PART Di THIS CgITRALT SEE IELHNICAL
nxxc xa
-m -10 O 10 20 w x0 w m m m SPEOIiLAnONS - 124.
?� �D pSiwQ iF(Y B/.RLxE (1EET)
® STATION 1160+00 XS—1
HORIZ. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT PERT. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT
30'

6�C®EPIR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
December 1, 2014
Town of North Topsail Beach
2008 Loggerhead Court
North Topsail Beach, N.C. 28460
Dear Sir or Madam:
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where
applicable, the State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff -colored
form) is retained by you and it must be available on site when the project is inspected for compliance. Please sign
both the original and the copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed envelope. Signing the permit and
proceeding means you have waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you may request a hearing pursuant to NCGS 113A-
121.1 or 1.137229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance with NCGS Chapter 150B with the Office
of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 2761.1-6714, [phone] within twenty
(20) days of this decision on your permit. You should also be. aware that another qualified party may submit an
objection to the issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days.
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work must be
carried out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future maintenance requires
additional approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review all project plans, as
approved. If you are having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to be sure that he fully
understands all permit requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we request that
you complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if questions arise
concerning permit conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact Department personnel
at any time for assistance. By working in accordance with the permit, you will be helping to protect our vitally
important coastal resources.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Douglas V. Huggett
Major Permits and Consistency Manager
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: htto://uortal.nedenr.org/web/cm/
An Equal Opportunity \ A9irmabve Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper