96-89 Cox, Polly

Permit Class Permit Number
NEW 96-89
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
and _
Coastal Resources Commission !
- Vrrmt"t `► AY 041989
for ��T]-u U3_
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern ---------------
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Polly S. Cox, Route 2, Box 338, Washington North Carolina 27889
authorizing development in Beaufort County at the Pamlico River, off SR 1730 at Pamlico
Beach as requested in the permittee s applicanon a 1/19/89 incl
ing attached plats, 4, plan view, x—section. location and location detail dated r iv
J� 1J�VJ.
This permit, issued on 5,/- Z a is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) The bulkhead will be positioned in strict accordance with permit plans.
To prevent an unintentional violation of this authorization, representatives
from the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management and/or the Corps of
Engineers will be available to stake the alignment prior to construction.
2) All backfill materials will be obtained from a high ground source and confined
landward of the permitted bulkhead.
3) All fill material to be placed below the normal water level will be confined
behind the permitted bulkhead.
4) The fill material will be clean and free of pollutants except in trace quantit-
ies. Metal products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be
used.
(See Attached Sheet for Additional Conditions
This permit action may be appealed by the perminee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
Deomber 31, 1992
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DNRCD and
the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
George T. Everett, Director
` Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Pemtittee

Polly' S. Cok
Permit # 96-89
Page 2 of 2
5) The area will be properly graded and a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion will be provided within 30 working days of completion of any phase
of grading on cut or filled slopes.
6) The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction -related
discharge.
7) The permittee will maintain the authorized work in good condition and in
conformance with the terns and conditions of this permit. The permittee
is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the structure without
having the permit transferred to a third party.
NUM: Future development on the permittee's property may require a modification
of this permit. Contact a representative of this Division at (919) 946-
6481 prior to commencement of any such activity for this determination.
NOTE. The proposed project is certified under General Water Quality Certification
No. 1272 issued on November 10, 1978, for bulkhead construction.

g 1993 !
NFFM77
MEMORANDUM
MAY 2
In my 13 January 1993 Memo to you (see attached) I recommended that CAMA Major
Permit No. 96-89 not be transferred to Steve Pescatore and renewed. After several additional
site visits and discussions with you and Terry, I would recommend transfer and renewal if the
following conditions and/or changes can be incorporated into the permit:
When Polly Cox obtained the permit it was to place the bulkhead an average of 8' from the NWL with a maximum distance in a washed out area of ±20'. Since
Mr. Pescatore has owned the property, the average is now 15.5' from the NWL
with a maximum in the washed out area of ±33'. I recommend that Mr.
Pescatore be allowed to reclaim what he has lost which is an average of 7.5' from
the NWL with a maximum of ±13'. The alignment should be staked and/or
verified by a representative of this Division.
2. I recommend that a condition be added stating that no fill will be placed in
jurisdictional wetlands unless authorization is obtained from the appropriate State
and Federal agencies.
These changes should prevent us from repeating the same scenario as Roger Scheel on
the Albemarle Sound in Tyrrell County where we gave him a permit to reclaim land lost prior
to his ownership and thereby prompted DOA to require an easement and restitution to the State
for the reclaimed land.
cc: Preston Pate

M E M O R A N D U M
TO: John Parker
r/ THROUGH: Terry Moore
FROM: David Moye
DATE: 13 January 1993
SUBJECT: Transfer and Renewal of CAMA Major Permit #96-89
On 9 December 1992 Mr. Steve Pescatore requested that CAMA Major Permit #96-69,
which had been issued to Polly Cox and expired on 31 December 1992, be transferred to
him and be renewed (see attached letter). I have reviewed the permit file and give a
brief chronological description below.
Polly Cox applied for a CAMA Major permit on 14 November 1984 to construct and
backfill a ±180' long bulkhead at Pamlico Beach on the north side of the Pamlico River.
The application requested an average distance of 3' beyond the •NWL for the bulkhead
alignment with ±4' being the greatest distance measured from the NWL. In the bio
report, no wetland vegetation was present on the project site. CAMA Major Permit #35-
84 was issued on 1 March 1984 and the work was completed. Sometime after completion
of the permitted bulkhead, breaches occurred in the bulkhead and severe erosion took
place.
On 7 March 1989, Polly Cox applied to repair the existing bulkhead and backfill
the area lost to erosion. The application stated that the average distance from the
existing shoreline to the bulkhead was ±8' and that the maximum distance in a washed
out area was ±201. The bio report stated that S. patens was present, but occurred at
an elevation of ±4' above the NWL and was not subjected to regular or irregular
flooding. CAMA Major Permit #96-89 was issued on 20 April 1989 for the replacement of
the existing bulkhead and associated backfill.
No work has been undertaken as authorized by CANA Major Permit 496-89 and erosion
has continued. Mr.. Pescatore purchased the property on 8 April 1991 and has waited
until the permit's expiration date to ask for a transfer and renewal. I was onsite the
property on 17 December 1992 to determine the current average of water behind the
bulkhead as well as any other changes that may have occurred since the permit was
issued. As shown on the attached plat, the average distance from the existing
deteriorated bulkhead to the shoreline is 15.51. The maximum distance is now ±331.
A substantial amount of S. patens is present along the shoreline and a large area of
Carex spp. is also present. I coordinated with Norm Sanders of the U. S. Army COE to
delineate any 404 wetlands. Norm and I were onsite on 11 January 1993 and a portion
of.the property was delineated as 404 wetlands by Norm (see attached plat).
In view of the substantial changes that have occurred on this property since the
20 April 1989 issuance of CAMA Major Permit #96-89, and the fact that Mr, Pescatore has
owned the site for almost 2 years without requesting a transfer, It is my opinion that
his request be denied. I suggest that Mr. Pescatore be advised to apply for a new
permit at which time I would be happy to explain his options for stabilizing the
property as it currently exist. If I can provide you with.additional information,
please let me know.

COrex
c,ce2
Vco 2� v�—
' cusG;nS �le� riorc�e� 3�k1,ec:c�
zo' Iz'
trc'
33'
,ice, l7cila�cis l� — 4;t
;z71
Co'k 9� �`3�i
I /
4— 40"A 1,nO_
—y \S bkl\V�NeocQ
COG- 1 r y a� 0'r o,n.a�ti
�ql°S
l l iL c-cQ-m bcr- 1 cjc- 'Z
���e� 11 �S wt,�al•� 11i3
�a 11.. 44r
5

DiJLu
!4I y 2 0� /fin , �v
l/ e, rv7, J

_ + TO:MOREHEAD CITY
FEB-15-193 MON 15:09 ID:DIV OF COASTAL MGMNT TEL NO:[phone] #Oe9 P02
' 4AIV 19 93 •-
ME M0RANDUM °'• �7
TO: John Parker 'G g-� 5
THROUGH, Terry Moore
FWM: David N.Y.
DATEt 13 January .1993 �" �`�� �✓
SUBJECT: Transfer and Renewal of CAMA Major Permit #96-89
On 9 December 1992 Mr. Steve Pesaatore requested that LAMA Major Permit #96-89,
which had been issued to Polly Cox and expired on 31 December 1992, be transferred to
him and be renewed (see attached letter). I have reviewed the, permit file and give a
brief chronological description below.
Polly Cox applied for a CANA Major permit on 14 November 1984 to construct and
backfill a ±180I long bulkhead at Pamlico Beach on the north side of the Pamlico River.
The application requested an average distance of 3' beyond the MM for the bulkhead
alignment with :W being the greatest distance measured from the WIL. In the bio
report, no wetland vegetation was present on the project site. CAMA Major Permit #35-
84 was issued on 1 March 1984 and the work was completed. Sometime after completion
of the permitted bulkhead, breaches occurred in tho bulkhead and severe erosion took
place. .
On 7 March 1989, Polly Cox applied to repair the existing bulkhead and backfill
the area lost to erosion. The application stated that the average distance from the
existing shoreline to the bulkhead was ±B' and that the maximum distance in a washed
out area was ±201. The bio report stated that S. patens was present, but occurred at
an elevation of ±4' above the NML and was not subjected to regular or irregular
flooding. CAMA Major Permit #96-89 was issued on 20 April 1989 for the replacement of
the existing bulkhead and associated backfill.
No work has been undertaken as authorized by CAMA Major Permit #96-89 and erosion
has continued. Mr, Pesaatore purchased the property on 8 April 1991 and has waited
until the permit's expiration date to ask for a transfer and renewal. I was onsite the
property on 17 December 1992 to determine the current average of water behind the
bulkhead as well as any other changes that may have occurred since the permit was
issued. As shown on the attached plat, the average distance from the existing "
deteriorated bulkhead to the shoreline is 15.51. The maximum distance is now ±33'.
A substantial amount of S. patens is present along the shoreline and a large area of
Carex app. is also present. I coordinated with Norm Sanders of 'the U. S. Army COE to
delineate any 404 wetlands. Norm and I were onsite on 11 January 1993 and a portion
of the property was delineated as 404 wetlands by Norm (see attached plat)-
In view of the substantial changes that have occurred on this property 0 nce`the!
20 April 1989 issuance of CARA Major Permit #96-69, and the fact that Mr, Pescatore?has
owned the site for almost 2 years without requesting a transfer, It is my'opinion that " ;..�.
his request be denied. I suggest that Mr. Pescatore be advised to apply for a, new
permit at which time I would be happy to explain his options for stabilizing the
Property as it currently exist. If I can provide you with additional information,.
please let me know., I

TO:MOREHEAD CITY
FEB-15-193 MON 15:09 ID:DIV OF COASTAL MGMNT TEL N0:C919D 733-1495 #oe9 P03
r—
S.1
x
Alr
v
r
170

e..sure ��—.— �--•
c� p hIAR 1 4 5989
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
10 March 1989
Mr. John R. Parker, Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
Division of Coastal Management
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Parker:
The attached copy of an application submitted by:
Polly S. Cox
Applicant's Name
Pamlico Beach Beaufort County
Location of Pr6ject County
David W. Owens
Director
x for a State permit to perform excavation and/or fill work in
coastal North Carolina and for a CAMA major development permit ....
for a CAMA major development permit (only) ....
for a dredge and fill permit (only) ....
has been reviewed by this District Office and is being forwarded to you
along with a Field Investigation Report for further application processing,
including circulation to State agencies having interest and/or jurisdiction
over the subject matter which might be affected by the project.
The recommendation of this Office is x covered on the reverse side;
attached; will be forwarde— "later.
Sincerely,
/7(00'te�
Terry Moore, Manager
Washington District
P.O. Box 27697, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7697 Tekphone 919-733-2293
An Equal Oppommiry Affirmative Action Empic,,w

i'. ., ;.•(ice e -
t; (A) This, office has no objection to the project as proposed.
(B") This office has no comment on the project as proposed.
x (C) This office approves of'the project (or project concept) and/or recommends
these minor refinements for project management. 1) The bulkhead shall be
constructed in strict accordance with .the submitted plats. 2) The bulkhead shall be
constructed prior to the placement of any backfill, 3) All backfill material will be
obtained from a highground source and confined behind the permitted bulkhead.
(D) This office objects to the project and recommends permit denial based
on a finding of:
(1) adverse impacts under G.S. 113-229(e) 1-5 (the dredge and fill
law)as enumerated below:
(e)(1) ... that there will be significant (e)(2) ... that there will .be signifi-
adverse effect of the proposed dredg- cant adverse effect on the value
ing and filling on the use of the and enjoyment of the property of
water by the public; any riparian ormers;
(e)(3) ... that there will be significant
adverse effect on public healthi
safety, and welfare;
(e)(4) ... that there will be signifi-
cant adverse effect on the con-
servation of public and private
water supplies;
(e)(5) that there will be significant .
adverse effect on wildlife or
fresh water,_ estuarine or marine
fisheries.
(2) Inconsistency with Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission
as enumerated in 15 NCAC 7H (or other). Please site rule.
(3) Inconsistency with the local Land Use Plan (please elaborate).
(4) _ Inconsistency with Rules, Guidelines, or Standards of
this agency- or a finding that the project is. in conflict
with other authority or interest as stipulated below.
(E) Attachment. Include :memorandum or other. documentation that support
findings relating to D1-4; or provide general comments.
Slggnture
Date

Memorandum
To: John Parker .p
From: LuAnn Bryan
Subj: Polly S. Cox - Conditions
Date: 21 March 1989
Recommendations & Conditions:
D As'
3 I� MAR 2 8 1QSg
uuc� Ui.:::
I conclude this application is consistent with Specific Use Standards O7H.0208
(b)(7)(D)(i-iv) and would accomplish the spirit and intent of the regulations.
Therefore I recommend issuance of the requested permit per the following
conditions.
1. The bulkhead be constructed in strict accordance with the submitted plats.
2. All backfill material will be obtained from a highground source and confined
behind the permitted bulkhead.
3. All fill material to be placed below NWL will be confined behind the permitted
bulkhead.

allYl wxl va:' a.vaw iaaaa avcu.a-avauaua.s . I. l .,. JJ L}' 40" lV
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long: 760. 37' 14" W
1. APPLICANT'S NAME Polly S. Cox
2. LOCATION OF PROJECTS
Pamlico River Photo Ref.
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL X CAMA X
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 1-17-89 3-7-89
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT Yes No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED 3-7-89
OFFICE Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTIO14: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Beaufort County
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Conservation -water
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP
Transition land be developed under very controlled conditions
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS X
ESTUARINE WATERSX OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC PRIVATE X COMMERCIALS
(E) TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING N/A
PLANNED
(F) TYPE OF STRUCTURES: EXISTING . Bulkhead- (deteriorated)
W.AMMn Bulkhead
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION 20' SOURCE Applicant
last year due to storm
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
AREA
(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(B) NON -VEGETATED WETLANDS:
Riverbottom
(C) OTHER:
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED: 1320 sq.ft.
8. 'PROJECT SUMMARY:
ver.
1320 sq.ft.
A

Environmental setting/Project proposal
The applicant's property is located in Beaufort County at Pamlico Beach Subdivision
on SR 1730 adjacent the north side of the Pamlico River. A previous CAMA Major
Development Permit 0 55-84) was issued to the applicant for a bulkhead, which
was constructed and backfilled. However, due to storm damage, the bulkhead has
failed and the shoreline has eroded. The property now has a scalloped shoreline
behind the existing damaged bulkhead which is vegetated with lawn grasses, Spartina
patens and pine trees on a sandy loam soil. As the lawn is approximately 4' above
NWL, I do not consider the Spartinapatens to be impacted by irregular or regular
flooding.
The applicant proposes to replace the deteriorated 165' bulkhead at its existing
alignment. The applicant will remove the old bulkhead and construct the new one
with a pressure pump using salt -treated timbers. The scalloped area behind the
bulkhead is a maximum of 20' to NWL, with the average distance being 81. The
water depth of these eroded areas is approximately minus 11.
Environmental impact
This project will result in the filling of approximately 1320 sq.ft. of river
bottom, requiring approximately 195 cubic yards of fill, with approximately 48
cubic yards being placed below NWL.
Recommendation & Conditions:
I conclude this application is consistent with Specific Use Standards O7H.0208
(b)(7)(D)(i-v) and would accomplish the spirit and intent of the regulations.
Therefore I recommend issuance of the requested permit.
LuAnn Bryan-Warmack - Washington Office - 10 March 1989

Y
I O
r�p 5
Mpg ��� ��°�'• •
eptS
OYE
se`ea°'`em
a44.��cac'°n C �p'l
'Sr's erc pc�` P
5�P-(E ��a'e� •
ECG oca�a4^U 29 a"o�
`io0s`s2
" la�eal
iUS$•xs Poc°ti��99
P
G• non. �avi� etsao n�
r GpOS�o �e� oSfiU as`e ct •
OS P .
' at6e �e�s lea
0
N

Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 Applicant n
a. Name lw S• l .��
Address
City WQ -,h State N- C
Zip:'17 R Y Day phone .5-77.5
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any)
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
2 Location of Proposed Project
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
,
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
r \,) ail-c-,
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
t)u1h1,.C-ccrj. Ir,-k- --('-T C
5t`r\nIe_ - ,nrr,,k,, -- r-1e_y\c�
.i
4 Land and Water Characteristics
a. Size of entire tract 1&a X LI Oc `
b. Size of individual lot(s) N� a-
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
5c�e1v I �a r,n
e. Vegetation on tract �-R1 p. 4 r e N s t •5 h r r\b5
a. Street address or secondary road number
_h f. Man-made features now on tract
b. City, town, community, or landmark g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
u. , I rc r, 1� e ce , k the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
,
c. County 3)rt a , ,, rD Conservation Transitional
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning Developed Community
jurisdiction? Nc•; _Rural Other
e. Name of body of water nearest project h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Yn ma r n —0, ,A! P,f-
3 Description and Planned Use
of Proposed Project
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). �1 ,1 k b c�
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
j. Hasa professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? N n If so, by whom?

5 Upland Development
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development. -
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
stmcturesproposed nl / A
b. Number of lots or parcels NiIA
c. Density (Give the number oresidential units and the
units per acre.) I ? i A
in. Water supply source n, ))�
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accesswaysp r provide new access.
L �A
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed 0.
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted -to the Division of Land
_
Resources? )V/k
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
N i iV
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management? /•
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.t
l�iit f
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval?
iV 14
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
6�/ /Z
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down"). % i !k
If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor?
6 Excavation And Fill Information
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Access CLI
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas
Length . Width Depth
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards /V / A-
c. Type of material _�/ /8-
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards AIA

f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area /V n' /
g. Location of spoil disposal area / )9-
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? 111 !,n
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i. Willa disposal area be available for future
maintenance? 1�,�
Ni
If so, where? 4
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water?
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards nl
in. Type of fill material
n. Source of fill material
o, Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? 1? / i
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? !V!
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
n� � a-
7 Shoreline Stabilization
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap / to rJ /
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
d.-Type of bulkheadmaterialSn/-h firea-ted --,'n ber
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
mean high water_ -d 49
f. Type of fill material S n
%�a�hP.r r•r`n t.t ���
J
8 Additional Information
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-'
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink -on an 8
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the ad-
jacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These in-
dividuals have 30 days in which to submit comments on
the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Manage-
ment and should be advised by the applicant of that op-
portunity.

Name
jc>iNr-, V%.
Sf�i�Fl
Address
J�_,,/
5 6
Ay. 0 Q7e29
Name
H o o C7
2o-Ft E r
Address
��•c /;
' ih Pn
h C.
Name
l b 6 r
Address
'R f 1
' 770
hC:GG vJiv�iiV
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
5—qLA CArMA, KVI
A check for $100 made payable to the Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development to
cover the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9. Certification and Permission
to Enter on Land
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project. N
This is the ` 1 day of C jO n ,-v, 19 q
Landowner or Autho ed agent

M OD f'Z,E
snn rr�!
+4.5
4.&
i5)nsT Si-r 7J� CF�oennaL
wQ'rEst Lia)
+3.G
I
r3A�K� Ll_.
I '
i
I
I
I
I N ��TER
t�iLCK FiLLc'+7
I
Ex+sr PvLK{-J�iu.�
W,

o1,,
CM,W7 0'o
C'M•N•WJ �'z�
Grv-3 rl

�,, /♦/ '
N'
h
♦ 1
E_-o--o.� '
c� I
/0�4
CO
—i CI
®� ortt
W
q
v
NNN
vl
`-n o •
•1 I �
�n `1, •.
1'0
R
O•
N
1-4
l

North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsley, Secretary
8 Decennber 1983
Mr. Kenneth D. Stewart, Director
Office of Coastal Management
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Stewart:
The attached copy of an application submitted by:
Polly S. Cox
)plicant's Name
ICE OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Kenneth D. Stewart
� Director
Teleph ne 919/7332293
RECEIVED
Pamlico Beach Beaufort County
)cation of Project County
XX for a State permit to perform excavation and/or fill
work in coastal North Carolina and for a CAMA major
development permit...
for a CAMA major development permit (only) ...
... is being circulated to State and Federal agencies having jurisdiction
over the subject matter which might be affected by the project.
Please indicate on the reverse side of this form your viewpoint on
the proposed work and return it to me not later than
22 December 1983
Sincerely,
I \�
n R. Parker, Jr.
Permit Coordinator
JRP:bli:2480
P. O. Box 27687 Raleioh. N. C. 27611 7687

xx (A) This agency interposes no objection to the proposed work.
(B) Dredge and/or Fill. This agency objects to the project
as proposed. The objection is based upon findings which
lead to the conclusion that there will be one or more
adverse effects as covered in G. S. 113-229 (e) 1-5.
(e) (1) ...that there will be significant
adverse effect of the proposed
dredging and filling on the use
of the water by the public;
(e) (2) ...that there will be significant
adverse effect on the value and
enjoyment of the property of any
riparian owners;
(e) (3) ...that there will be significant
adverse effect on public health,
safety, and welfare;
(e) (4) ...that there will be significant
adverse effect on the conservation
of public and private water
supplies;
(e) (5) that there will be significant
adverse effect on wildlife or
fresh water, estuarine or marine
fisheries;
(C) CANA Major Development. This agency objects to the
project as proposed. The objection is based upon
findings which lead to the conclusion that a violation
would occur as covered in G.S. 113A-120 and/or 15
NCAC 7I. The following reference indicates the
specific citation by which objections have been
made.
(D) Agency findings relating to item(s) A and/or B
and/or C are hereby detailed.
CCMITIONS ON SEPARATE SHEET
(E) Comments are submitted that do not directly relate
to item B and/or C but are relevant to the public
interest. (These comments will be forwarded by the
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
to appropriate State or Federal agencies).
signed
f�k -$
ate

Polly S. Cox
Beaufort County
CONDITIONS:
(1) All'backfill material will be obtained from a highgmund source and
confined behind the pematted bulkhead.
(2) All fill material to be placed below normal behind the pewater level will be confined
rntitted bulkhead.
(3) No marsh grass will be excavated or filled.

• OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. Applicant's name Polly S. Cox
2. Location of project site Beaufort county, pamlico Beach near end of SR 1730,
Pamlico River, photo number 59-755-M20-M21
3. Investigation type: Dredge & Fill" XX ' CAMA XX
4. Investigative procedure: (A) Dates of site visit 12-1-83
(B) Was applicant present No
5. Processing procedure: Application received 12-7-83 Office Washington
6. Site description: (A) Local Land Use Plan Beaufort County
Land classification from LUP " Conservation
Development constraints identified in LUP None
(B) AEC(s) involved: Ocean Hazard Estuarine shoreline XX
Coastal wetlands Public trust waters
Estuarine waters M Other
(C) Water dependent: Yes No XX. Other
(D) Intended use: Public Private XX Commercial
(E) Type of waste water treatment: Existing ' Septic tank
Planned None
(F) Type of structures: Existing. Single family dwelling and one trailer
Planned None
(G) Estimated annual rate of erosion Source
7. Habitat description: AREA
(A) Vegetated wetlands: Dredged Filled Other
None N/A N/A
(B) Non -vegetated wetlands:
(C) Other:
Open water area
None + 540 sq.ft.
(D) Total area disturbed: _ + 540 sq.ft.
8. Project summary The applicant is proposing to construct a 180' long bulkhead which
will average 3' beyond the NWL. Also to be constructed is a 58' long breakwater
which will have a 2' opening every 10'.

Environmental settin
The applicant owns a 150' wide by 400' long lot at Pamlico Beach on the
Pamlico River. One single family dwelling and one camper trailer are
located on the property; bath are served by a septic tank sewage disposal system.
The lot is wooded and is vegetated mostly with pines. Severe erosion is
occurring on the property which is evident by a severe erosion scarp and several
fallen trees. No wetland vegetation is present at the project site.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing to bulkhead his property to retard ongoing erosion
and to reclaim land recently lost to erosion. The bulkhead will be 180' long,
will average 3' beyond the NWL and will be + 4' at the furthest point. When
completed, the bulkhead will be backfilled with materials from an upland source.
Also proposed is the construction of a 58' long breakwater which will connect
to the eastern end of the proposed bulkhead. The structure will have a 2'
opening every 10' to provide water circulation. Also a 10' opening will be
left between the end of the breakwater and the bulkhead which is located in
front of the adjacent property owners lot. The area is to be used as a safe
mooring for a small skiff.
Environmental impact
The project as proposed should have a minimal environmental impact. No wetland
vegetation will be excavated or filled. + 540 sq.ft. of open water area
landward of the bulkhead will be filled.
David L. Gossett - Washington Office - 8 December 1983

APPLICATION
FOR
PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
Department of Administration State of North Carolina Department of the Army
(GS 14&12) Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(GS 113-229, 143-215.3(a)(1), 143-215.3(c), 113A-118 (33 CFR 209.320-329)
Please type or print and fill in all blanks. If information is not applicable, so indicate by placing N/A in blank.
Applicant Information
A. Name
B. Address
Street, P.,O. Box or Route
City or Town State
IL Location of Proposr Project:
A. County ,6eii/J f or%
B. 1. City, town, community or landmark
Zip Code
2. Is proposed work within city limits? YesNo w , n
C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or nearest named body of water to project
111. Description of Project
A. 1. Maintenance of existing project
2. New work
B. Purpose of excavation or fill,,yy/
1. Access channel �/f'� length width depth
€1
2. Boat basin > _/'0length width depth
3. Fill area /'rf%�sssvvvlength width depth
4. Other IFj �✓17Trlength SBA width depth /f//A 1( 2_',0reak •{'0 6e-
C. 1. Bulkhead length __1Average distance waterward of MHW (shoreline) -3 /ems e✓rr.� /o'
2. Type of bulkhead construction (material) - S417' Tregje Pl Xc, ,6e r
D. Excavated material (total for project)
1. Cubic yards /y/ 9 2. Type of material ylg
E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (see also VI. A)
1.' Cubic yards 4f, V 4eQ —2. Type of material `Sf' a' C 1'9,e le"""
IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment:
A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes No
B. Does the disposal area include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes No '."
C. Disposal Area
1. Location 'VIA
2. Do you claim title to disposal area!_(✓lA
D. Fill material source if I ill is to be trruked in
E. How will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled?. A r 1ia— 4&
I__.1 • _f L- w],_-._1 •T. .r I _ _ . ,'YJ n.«•T.,- _ C -I--a- _.___ _I i, ') i,..n/..
I . 'I ype of equipment to be used /ynyma I M1 N k " r— i'oa)IrAci rnzt r_o w �mv_.� /.
G. Will marshland he trussed in transporting equipment to project site? If yes, explain ND
D& F-B 1

V. Intended Use of Project Area (Describe)
A. 1. Private J — F,41.7 z
2. Commercial
3. Housing Development or Industrial
4. Other
B. 1. Lot size(s) / -SO " X YO a'
2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water
3. Soil type and texture Sro i P F S.t
4. Type of building facilities or structures / /tons ea -,r/
5. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing Planned
B. Describe s . P I ' e_ TA.k
6. Land Classification (circleone) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITY' RURAL
CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis)
VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality:
A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes No
B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the
area following project completion? Yes —No
2. Type of discharge
3. Location of discharge A//A
VI 1. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known):
s�
VII I. Lost permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for
work in project area; if applicable:
IX. Length of time required to complete project: r".
X. In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided:
A. Attach a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant
claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property,
then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written
permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land.
B. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8Y2 X 11" white paper (see instruction boc-klet for
details). Note: Original drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted.
C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or
certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113-229 (d))Enter date served %lod, ir7 a- 716a, /3 — /�83
D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. ,
Such
in which to
OY
agencies listed below.
XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies
with the State of North Carolina's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a
manner consistent with such program.
XIL Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli.
cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel-
opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing.
DATE
Applicant's Signature
D&F•82 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS
Rev. 10/78

04
r
��RK�pre Ic
I

O '£
3a-.L
ars � a.oys
-y .� i•
.
'�aday�l
n
t
I
-
'

Fi /(
t A,o M H W
i-J.D
I.O
Tys,ca L X'sccl•oa� �1 ���KArM�°
Scaf� -