NCDOT_89-13 Minor Mod Brunswick River

Permit Class
MODIFICATION/MINOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vermt"t
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Permit Number
89-13
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Authorizing development in Brunswick County at the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek on
US 17-74-76 / NC 133 as requested in the permittee's applieaden letters dated 5/21/14
and revised letter dated 6/26/14, including the attached drawings as referenced in Condition No 3 of this permit
This permit, issued on 7/22/14 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consisten
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terns ma3
be subject to tines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Modification of Bridue Design and In -Work Moratoria (TIP No. R-3601)
1) This minor modification of CAMA Permit No. 89-13 authorizes a revision to the bridge designs to
allow fewer columns that are larger in diameter, deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick
Bridge No. 108, a modification of the in -water work moratoria, placement of fill adjacent to Alligator
Creek, and additional impacts from utility line work.
2) All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification
unless specifically altered herein.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
C
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
No Expiration Date, pursuant to GS 136-44.7B
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program. I
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
70,'z-- Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature ofPermittee

N.C. Department of Transportation
TIP No. R-3601
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit # 89-13
Page 2 of 2
3) Unless specifically altered herein, all work authorized by this permit modification shall be carried out in
accordance with the following fifty nine (59) workplan drawings:
'/2 size drawings: Thirty-one (31) drawings dated 5/8/2014, five (5) dated 5/20/14, two (2) dated
6/25/2014, four (4) dated 6/9/2014, thirteen (13) dated 6/10/2014, three (3) dated
6/11/2014, and one (1) dated as received on 5/22/14.
4) The permittee shall adhere to an in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River from January 1 st
through September 30th and in Alligator Creek from January 1st through June 30th, of any year. During
the moratoria, in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of
barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using the screwing in
method. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval
from the NC Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies.
5) This minor modification shall be attached to the original of Permit No. 89-13, which was originally
issued on 8/2/13, as well as all subsequent modifications and/or refinements, and copies of all
documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for
compliance.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Jahn E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
July 14, 2014
Brunswick County
NCDWQ Project No. 13-0472v.4
Widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133
TIP Project No. R-3601
MODIFICATION to APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, with ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS.
Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Hancock:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts associated with the
widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133 from NC 133 (River Road)/SR 1472(Village Road) Interchange to the US
421 /NC 133 Interchange in Brunswick County:
Revised Stream Impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin
Site
Station
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
'Temporary
Total
Stream
Fill in
Fill in
Fill in
Fill in
Stream
Impactd
Intermittent
Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Impact
Requir
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
(linear ft)
Mitigat
linear ft
linear it)linear
it)linear
it)linear
1
-Y2-13+05
0
0
47
10
57
0
l3
-Y- 34+98 to 36+55
58*
37
0
0
95
0
TOTAL
58*
37
47
10
152
0
Total Revised Stream Impact for Project: 152 linear feet.
*includes 14 If of bank stabilization
Revised Wetland Impacts in the Cane Fear River Basin (rivarian)
Site
Station
Fill
(ac)
Fill
(temporary)
ac
Excavation
(temporary)
ac
Mechanized
Clearing
ac
Hand
Clearing
ac
Total
Wetland
Impact ac
2
-LMED- 54+37 to 54+75 RT
<0.01
0
<0.01
0
0.02
0.03
3
64+43 LT & -LMED- 65+92 to 66+26 LT
0.03
0
<0.01
0
0.04
0.07
4
76+31 LT & -LMED- 74+99 to 75+19 RT
1 0.04
<0.01
<0.01
0
0.16
0.21
Transportation and Permit ing Unit
1617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone]
Internet �.ncxatemualiN.om
e
NCarolina
oNaturally
An Equal OpporLunny 1 Afiniabve Action Empbyer

Fill
5
-LMED- 83+00 to 83+21 RT
0
<0.01
<0.01
0
0
0.01
6
-LRT- 85+81 to 87+69 RT
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.01
7
-LLT- 90+25 to 90+74
LT & -LLT- 94+00 to 94+21 LT
0
<0.01
<0.01
0
<0.01
0.01
8
-LLT- 99+60 to 99+97 LT
<0.01
0
0
0
0.01
0.01
9
-LRT- 101+06 to 101+17 RT
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
10
-LLT-111+79 to 113+14 RT
LRT- 112+37 to 114+59
0.14
0.03
0
0
0.10
0.27
11
-LRT- 115+52 to 115+61 RT
LRT- 121+21 to 121+77 RT
0
0
0
0
0.03
0.03
12
-Y2- 20+65
0.16
0
0
0.04
0
0.20
14
-Y- 38+30 RT
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
EC measures in HC areas
0
0.04
0
0
0
0.04
UTILITIES*
U 1
73+52 to 73+94.
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.01
U2
79+32 to 79+73
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U3
84+95 to 85+05
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U4
90+64 to 93+31
<0.01
0
0
0
<0.01
0.01
U5
95+69 to 95+64
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U6
100+59 to 101+50
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U7
107+05 to 107+47
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U8
114+93 to 115+07
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
U9
115+21 to 115+66
<0.01
0
0
0
0
<0.01
U10
121+04to 121+18
0
0
0
0
<0.01
<0.01
TOTAL**
0.37
0.08
1 0.02
0.04
0.41
0.92
Total Revised Wetland Impact for Project: 0.92 acres.
*after -the -fact authorization - these sites were not included in the original authorization request and
discovered after impacts had occurred.
**totals may not match sum of individual impacts due to rounding.
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received May 21, 2014 and revisions
received on June 26, 2014. After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3891 and 3884. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 23 and Nationwide Permit 12 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other
federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the
accompanying 404 permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the NCDWR and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying

with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the -attached certification(s) and any additional conditions_listed below.
Condition(s) of Certification:
Project Specific Conditions
1. All of the authorized activities and written conditions of the certification associated with the original Water
Quality Certification dated May 15, 2013 still apply except where superseded by this certification.
2. The permittee will need to adhere to all appropriate in -water work moratoria (including the use of pile driving
or vibration techniques) as prescribed by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Marine
Fisheries and National Marine Fisheries. The in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River extends
from January 1" through September 30th and in Alligator Creek from January I' through June 30'", of any
year. During the moratoria in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction,
spudding of barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using screwing
methodology. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval
from the NC Division of Water Resources and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission. In addition, the
permittee shall conform to the NCDOT policy entitled "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish
Passage (May 12, 1997) at all times.
3. As a condition of this 401 Water Quality Certification, the bridge demolition and construction must be
accomplished in strict compliance with the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices for
Construction and Maintenance Activities.
4. For the 47 linear feet of streams being impacted due to site dewatering activities, the site shall be graded to its
preconstruction contours and revegetated with appropriate native species.
5. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the NCDOT's National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Stormwater Permit NCS000250, including the applicable requirements of
the NCGO1000.
6. Please be aware that by having impacted wetlands not covered under the original 401 Water Quality.
Certification issued to this project without first applying for and securing a modification of the certification,
you have violated Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2H .0500. Title 15A
NCAC 2H .0500 requires certifications pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act whenever
construction or operation of facilities will result in a discharge into navigable waters, including wetlands, as
described in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 323. It also states any person desiring issuance or
modification of the State certification or coverage under a general certification required by Section 401 of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall file with the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative.hearings. You must file the petition
with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered
filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except
for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center

Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: (919)-431-3100
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows: _
Mr. Lacy Presnell, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
I601 Mail Service Center I k
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Mason Hemdon at (910) 3084021 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Reeder, Director `
Division of Water Resources
ec: Brad Shaver, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Stoney Mathis, Division 3 Environmental Officer
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Environmental Protection Agency
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Amy James, NCDOT NES
Steve Sollod, NC Coastal Management
Steven Lane, NC Coastal Management
Sonia Carrillo, NCDWQ Central Office
File Copy

SAW-2007-03641-010
- -- - - - - U.S. ARMY- CORPS OF ENGINEERS-- - -- - -- -
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2007-03641-010 County: Brunswick U.S.G.S. Quad: Wilmington
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee:
NC DOT
Agent: NC DOT
Attn: Mr. Richard Hancock. P.E.
attn: Ms. Amy James
Address:
Manager, PDEA
PDEA-Natural Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Raleigh, NC 27699
Size (miles)
2+
Nearest Town Leland
Nearest Waterway
Brunswick River/Alligator Creek
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC
03030005
Coordinates Latitude: 34.2344
Longitude:-77.9795
Location description:
The project area is along US 17/74/76
from the NC 133/SR 1472 interchange to the U
Description of projects area and activity: The NCDOT propose to widen the aforementioned stretch of road from four to six
lanes which also involves the replacement of bridges over the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek. Additionally. the
northbound brifte will be the start of an additional seventh lane that will continue on US 17 into Wilmington. The project as
proposed would result in the permanent loss of 0.38 acres of non tidal wetlands, 0.03 acres of tidal wetlands. and 105 linear
feet of intermittent stream. This verification additionally covers after the fact impacts for directional bore utilities already
installed. The utility impacts total <0.01 of an acre of wetland fill and 0.03 of an acre of hand clearing.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
® Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 23 and NW 12.
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and .your submitted application, modified Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 12 request dated June 26, 2014. Any
violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910.251-4611 or Brad.E.Shaver(a),usace.army.mil.

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the jaw or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water ;act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ® Thejurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued 10/6/2008 and 2/24/2010. Action 1D: SAW-2007 3641.
Basis For Determination: The subject area exhibited both an ordinary high water and had characteristics of
wetlands as described in the 1987 Corps Delineation Manual and both resources are abutting or drain to the Cape Fear River,
Brunswick River, or Alligator Creek, all of which are traditionally navigable water bodies that are subject to the ebb and flood
of tides.
Remarks: See special conditions.
SHAVER.BRAD.EaE°°-
^u °N«ter°
Corps Regulatory Official:1276601756 Date: 7/14/2014
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2017
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at littp:/1pert.nwp.usace.armv.mil/survey.btntl .
Copy furnished (electronic):
NCDENR-DWR, Mr. Mason Herndon
NCDOT-NES, Mr. Chris Rivenbark
NC WRC, Mr. Travis Wilson
NCDENR-DCM, Mr. Stephen Lane
NCDENR-DCM, Mr Steve Sollod
NCDOT-Div 3, Mr. Stonewall Mathis
NCDOT-Div 3, Mr. Jackson Provost
USACE, Mr. Todd Tugwell
NCEEP. Ms. Beth Harmon

saw-2067-0364 10
— SPECIAL CONDITIONS
R-3601
Proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC 133 from NC 133/SR 1472
Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange, Brunswick County
COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS
1. All work must be performed in strict compliance with the plans attached to the NCDOT letters dated May
21, 2014 and undated June 26, 2014, which are authorized by this permit. Any modification to the authorized
permit plans must be approved by the USACE prior to implementation.
COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS
2. Failure to institute and carry out the details of the following special conditions, below, will result in a
directive to cease all ongoing and permitted work within waters and/or wetlands associated with the permitted
project, or such other remedies and/or fines as the District Engineer or his authorized representatives may seek.
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
3. The permittee will ensure that the construction design plans for this project do not deviate from the
authorized permit plans. Any deviation in the construction design plans will be brought to the attention of the
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office prior to any active construction in waters or wetlands.
4. All activities described in the plans as temporary must be restored to their pre project conditions before
completion of the project.
PROTECTED RESOURCES
5. The NCDOT must use the United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service's GUIDELINES
FOR AVOIDING IMPACTS TO THE WEST INDIAN MANATTEE: Precautinary Measures for Construction
Activities in North Carolina Waters (attached).
6. The NCDOT must adhere to an inwater work moratorium for the Brunswick River between the periods of
Jan 1 — Sept 30 and for Alligator Creek during Jan 1 — June 30 of any year during the construction period.
During the moratoria in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of
barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using screwing methodology. No
other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval from the Resource
Agencies through Corps coordination.

CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE
7. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and conditions of this
pennit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its contractors and/or
agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this project with a copy of this permit, and any
authorized modifications. A copy of this permit including the authorized plans referenced in Special Condition
(1) and authorized modifications, including all conditions, shall be available at the project site during
constriction and maintenance of this project.
ACTIVITIES NOT AUTHORIZED
8. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this permit, no excavation, fill,
or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this
project, within waters or wetlands, or shall any activities take place that cause the degradation of waters or
wetlands. In addition, except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized
land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this project, in such a
manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns within, into, or out of waters or wetlands or to reduce
the reach of waters or wetlands.
This permit does not authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material or
construction equipment within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area.
BORROW AND WASTE
9. To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on high ground and do not result in the degradation of
adjacent wetlands and streams, except as authorized by this permit, the permittee shall require its contractors
and/or agents to identify all areas to be used to borrow material, or to dispose of dredged, fill, or waste material.
The pennittee shall provide the USACE with appropriate maps indicating the locations of proposed borrow or
waste sites as soon as the permittee has that information. The permittee will coordinate with the USACE before
approving any borrow or waste sites that are within 400 feet of any streams or wetlands. All jurisdictional
wetland lines on borrow and waste sites shall be verified by the Corps of Engineers and shown on the approved
reclamation plans. The permittee shall ensure that all such areas comply with the preceding condition of this
permit, and shall require and maintain documentation of the location and characteristics of all borrow and
disposal sites associated with this project. This information will include data regarding soils, vegetation and
hydrology sufficient to clearly demonstrate compliance with the preceding condition. All information will be
available to the USACE upon request. NCDOT shall require its contractors to complete and execute
reclamation plans for each waste and borrow site and provide written documentation that the reclamation plans
have been implemented and all work is completed. This documentation will be provided to the Corps of
Engineers within 30 days of the completion of the reclamation work.
REPORTING OF VIOLATIONS
10. The permittee will report any violation of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act in writing to the Wilmington District, U. S Army Corps of
Engineers, within 24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.

SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
11. All fill material must be adequately stabilized at the earliest practicable date to prevent sediment from
entering into adjacent waters or wetlands. The permittee shall remove all sediment and erosion control
measures placed in wetlands or waters, and shall restore natural grades in those areas; prior to project
completion.
12. Any directional bores proposed near or around jurisdictional features must take all necessary precautions to
avoid any slurry or frac out incidents from entering jurisdictional areas. These precautions should include the
use of vac trucks where appropriate and secondary containment around the entry and exit pits.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
13. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility
Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby
incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization.
SHAVER.BRAD. HAWRBRA ER]5601]56
DN:I.S, .-US. G.y,bi nt ou=DaD,
m=
E.1276601756SHAVEPB`AMB50..II RADE]560U55
MW 2014.07.141&18:O5 L4b0'

r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
1iMAYM0335FFI 1/l3rl
TO: Doug Huggett
FROM: Stephen Lane
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
SUBJECT: Comments & Recommendations — Minor Modification for CAMA Permit No. 89-13
NCDOT- Widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133, (TIP No. R-3601)
Brunswick County
DATE: July 15, 2014
The following are my comments and recommendations regarding the above mentioned permit modification
request. The request is to revise the bridge designs to allow fewer columns that are larger in diameter and to
allow deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick Bridge 108. Additionally the applicant requests to modify
the in -water work moratoria, revise utility impacts, and place surcharge on the east bank of Alligator Creek for
the approaches to Bridges 107 and 108. Based upon my review I have no objection to the issuance of this
permit modification but offer the following conditions:
1 This minor modification of CAMA Permit No. 89-13 authorizes a revision to the bridge designs to allow
fewer columns that are larger in diameter, deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick Bridge 108, a
modification of the in -water work moratoria, placement of surcharge adjacent to Alligator Creek, and
additional impacts from utility line work and surcharge fill placement.
This minor modification shall be attached to the original of Permit #89-13, which was originally issued
on August 2, 2013 as well as all subsequent modifications and/or refinements, and copies of all
documents must be readily available. on site when a Division representative inspects the project for
compliance.
The permittee must adhere to an in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River from January 1st
through September 30th and in Alligator:Creek from January 1st through June 30th, of any year. During
the moratoria, in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of
barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using the screwing in
method. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval
from the NC Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies.
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

NCDOT- Minor Modification Request, R-3601, Brunswick County
Comments and Recommendations
Page 2 1
4 All work authorized by this permit modification shall be carried out in accordance with the following
attached workplan drawings: 1'.14rl�i�v
'/2 size drawings: Thirty-seven datedS8/2014;�to (2) dated 6/25/2014, four (4) dated 6/9/2014,
one (1) tieSVI1 2014, fear' ( utility drawmg�,ted 6/10/2014,
three (3) utility drawings dated 6/11/2014, e x(� W-'� "
5 All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless
specifically altered herein.
6 This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or authorizations that
may be required.
-FI rlI+
''r..
G +fiL' `!
G "I'rl !
ro pe4-
yIrl
1 r,% -qj
af-liq
z��2�i 3013133,�� 1D� 3r
/-7i rl�ll� Y3
P•s`! I P�I°IfTs2�,39
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncooastalmanagement.net
V
An Equal Opportunity \ Affinafive Action Employer

. A
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
E6VENIER sECRPT1
June 26, 2014
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
US Army Corp. of Engineers Division of Coastal Management
69 Darlington Avenue 400 Commerce Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 Morehead City, NC 28557
ATTN: Brad Shaver
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sirs':
ATTN: Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Revised Modification Request for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23,
Section 10 Permit, CAMA Major Development Permit, and Section 401
Water Quality Certification for proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC
133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange,
Brunswick County. Federal Aid Project No. NHS-0017(68); TIP No. R-3601.
References: R-3601 404/401/CAMA permit application dated April 26, 2013
R-3601 Nationwide Permit 23 and 5,issue d August 19, 2013 (SAW-2007-
03461-010)
R-3601 Major CAMA permit, issued August 2, 2013 (#89-13)
R.-3601 401 Water Quality CeA iflsaaen, issued May 16, 2013 (TDALR4 I
As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
widen US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133
Interchange by adding one auxiliary lane in each direction. The purpose of this letter is to
update the recent modification request of the issued permits for this project to account for
design changes and geotechnical conditions. Please find enclosed revised permit drawings
(sheets 28, 29, 32, 34, 35, and 36), revised utility drawings, stormwater management plan, and
wetland permit impact summary from the modification submittal with this revision request.
Bridge 108 on southbound US 17 over Alligator Creek will be widened to provide a new
traffic lane on the south side of the current alignment. Flat roadway grade line profiles
required to meet existing bridge deck elevations on bridge 108 have led to concerns about
r
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX [phone] CENTURY CENTER BUILDING
PROTECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMEMAL ANALYs6 WE5817E: IMNYY.NCDOT.OR JUN 3 O ZOI1 4 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DR.
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH,NC 2761D
RALEIGH NC 27699�1548
D014dt9HD CITY

potential ponding and accumulation of ice on the bridge deck along the south side barrier. To
remedy this situation and improve safety, deck drains will be installed on the south side of the
bridge at 6' intervals over a distance of 276 feet. While stormwater from new deck surfaces
will be discharged directly to the waterway at Bridge 108, all of the surface drainage at Bridge
107 is to be removed and treated prior to discharge into Alligator Creek, for a net reduction of
3,860 sq. ft. of stormwater draining directly into the creek. Additional justification for deck
can
As you are aware, there has been utility activity in jurisdictional areas that was not included in
our permit. Therefore, NCDOT is requesting an additional <0.01 of permanent wetland fill
for the relocation of an Earthlink line and addition of utility boxes. There has also been a
change in the profile of a directional bore of an AT&T underground phone line (no additional
impacts), which is reflected on the permit drawings.
Lastly, geotechnical studies have revealed the need for a surcharge on the east bank of the
Alligator Creek for the roadway approach to Bridges 107 and 108. The surcharge involves
placement of temporary fill for an interval of time to a specified height in order to consolidate
existing underlying soils. The necessary height of the surcharge will lead to an increase in
temporary fill in the wetlands between the east and west bound lanes until the surcharge soil is
removed. The temporary impact area will replace an area originally designated for hand
clearing. The result is an increase of temporary fill in wetland (from 0.01 acre to 0.04 acre
total) and a reduction of hand clearing in wetland (from 0.41 acre to total of 0.38 acre).
Regulatory Approvals
CAMA: NCDOT is revising the recently submitted Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
Major Development permit modification request to account for the change in impacts as noted
above.
Section 404; NCDOT is revising die i mently submitted Nationwide 23 modification request
to account for the change in impacts as noted above.
Section 401: NCDOT is revising the recently submitted Water Quality Certification
modification request to account for the change in impacts noted above. All general conditions
of the Water Quality Certification will continue to be met. NCDOT is providing this revision
letter to the NCDWR for their review and approval.
A copy of the revised sheets will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
httl2s://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental!Pages/default.aspx under Quick Links >
Permit Applications

Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Amy James at [e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely,
Richard Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
rTRECEIVEDN 30 ?r't

James, Amy E
From:
Herndon, Mason
Sent:
Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:07 PM
To:
James, Amy E
Cc:
Rivenbark, Chris
Subject:
RE: R-3601 bridge 108
Thanks Amyl At this point I would say that you have adequately justified the need for deck drains on the south side of
108 and we can proceed accordingly.
MH
Mason Herndon
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
mason. herndon(a)ncdenr.eov
Phone: [phone]
E-mall correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:51 PM
To: Herndon, Mason
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: R-3601 bridge 108
Hi Mason,
In follow-up to your conversation with Chris yesterday, I checked with hydraulics concerning the location of deck drains
on the existing bridge 108 and the possible use of sonar to determine low spots. Here is what I got from hydro:
Deck drains currently exist against the north barrier only on bridge 108. You can see them on Google street
view: https://www.google.com/maps/@34.234521:
77.969746.3a, 90y,34.29 h,35.49t/data=!3 m4! le 1! 3m2! lsDPH idrpG!Qsuxbfxl LrS3A!2eO
There is a constant 2% cross slope from the existing south barrier to the north barrier that slopes toward the existing
deck drains. The existing south barrier and shoulder will be cut off and replaced with the lane addition. The proposed
lane addition to bridge 108 would have a 2.5% cross slope in the opposite direction (toward the south barrier), which is
where we would like to put deck drains.
The thing about surveying the bridge for low spots that makes it impractical, is that we wouldn't be able to do so until
the lane addition to the bridge was finished and deck drains are formed in during construction.
I also asked about moving the easternmost bent on bridge 107 10 feet in either direction, but have not yet received a
response (it would have to come from our design -build team). When l getone I will forward it on!
Thanks,
Amy REC6NEU
rn7XA4-MffD
N 3 0 2014
CTY

f
James, Amy E
From:
James, Amy E
Sent:
Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:55 PM
To:
Herndon, Mason
Cc:
Rivenbark, Chris; [e-mail]; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve
Subject:
RE: R-3601 revised mod request
Mason,
I was going to save this for the cover letter in our forthcoming revised mod request, but decided that the answers were
long and complicated enough that I'm going to forward them now, straight from our hydraulics unit (in italics):
As for why the change in design now:
The original NCDOT design from 2 or 3 years ago was Alternative 1, described below, without deck drains. At the time it
was designed originally, FHWA design guidance indicated this was a viable solution. Since then, the project went to
Design Build and is being revised and re -reviewed. NCDOT Hydraulics received spread calculations from the design build
team on April25, 2014. Between the time of original design and the present time, instances of ponding on low slope
(nearly flat) bridges have come to light which caused Hydraulics to provide a greater factor of safety and more
redundancy when dealing with bridge deck spread.
And to answer your other questions:
1) Are you capturing and discharging stormwater water from the roadway prior to it reaching the bridge and
discharging through the deck drains?: Inlets are proposed on the roodwayjust off each end of the bridge to
capture stormwater before it reaches the bridge. Only bridge deck water would be discharged through deck
drains.
..1.. Ky`kn•eie.. A!Ai�Uf.MY__�iH �• ,✓'1 f—`.
,U N✓�TfGYt. } n
-ZIT
2) What other options did DOT consider before adding open deck drains and why were they not determined to be
adequate options?:
Alternative 1: Provide no deck drains on the widened section. This alternative would have water draining from
the crown of the bridge deck across the new widened section toward the south bridge barrier (see light -blue
arrows). Water would need to pond against the new bridge barrier and up into the lane until it pooled high
enough to runoff the ends of the bridge. This bridge is flat from end to end, so there is no prevailing slope along
the bridge barrier to cause water to flow toward one end where it could be collected in an inlet. Alternative 1
could be on academic solution that worked on paper. However, in practice this alternative is not feasible for

three reasons. 1) Abridge such as 108 that is nominally 'flat" has imperfections in the deck that result in low
areas where water will pond against the barrier, across the shoulder, and into the lane. 2) It is common for
bridges to collect debris such as sand and clumps of grass as high as 6 inches against the bridge barrier that will
act as miniature dams that will also trap water and cause ponding. 3) Historically, NCDOT hos not constructed
bridges without an affirmative means of providing deck drainage, whether it is through deck drains or a
prevailing slope to cause water to flow off the ends. Our responsibility to the public requires we provide a well
thought out drainage solution with built in redundancy that will function in spite of deck imperfections, debris
accumulation, or other unforeseen problems. Providing no deck drains is a solution that requires conditions that
ore too delicate to be reliable over the long term.
Alternative 2: Provide a variable cross slope on the new lane. This option was proposed by the design build
team. This design wouldcreate a 'false crest" in the middle of the bridge at the 1%cross slope location which
would cause water to flow east and west toward the ends of the bridge, where cross slope was gradually
increased to 2.5%. The false crest would cause a slope along the bridge barrier of 0.18%falling toward each end
of the bridge, which is below NCDOT's minimum gutter slope of 0.3% considered constructible and adequate to
induce water to flow reliably. Like Alternative 1, Alternative 2 could bean academic solution that worked on
paper. However, in practice Alternative 2 is not feasible for reasons land 2 cited for Alternative 1. Ultimately,
this solution requires conditions that are too delicate to be reliable over the long term. Furthermore, the area of
1% cross slope in the middle of the bridge is not steep enough to cause water to move across the lone toward the
bridge barrier quickly enough to prevent ponding. Said another way, the water depth as it sheet flowed across
the 1%section would be deep enough to cause hydroplaning. Additionally, we cannot steepen the cross slope
enough to create adequate slope along the barrier rail due to constraints preventing lowering the low chord,
bridge structural design constraints, and roadway design criteria governing maximum cross slope on a straight
section of road.
«.
u.
Yltfl R4
+'+M. fNy 4.15`q l4q if Ma»cW aanp➢aMp� DYMr
.cif n'Wlbbw. Q3�ib Eb llkAHn,M xME df
Alternative 3: Closed drainage system. This bridge is very close to the water surface. Notice the dark high tide
line on the piling cap in the picture below. A closed drainage system would be submerged during high tide, and
would be subject to damage from the tidal flow. It would also decrease clearance under the bridge.
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 2014
DCMMADMY

Alternative 4: Provide additional width on the shoulder to accommodate ponding. The new widened section
could be made slightly wider before it was limited by the constraint of not lowering the low chord. The additional
width would provide additional ponding area. However, spread on a nominally 'flat" bridge is unpredictable for
the reasons cited in Alternative 1 (deck imperfections and debris). If we could reliably predict the spread (as on a
non flat bridge) this would be a viable alternative. (Non flat bridges are also somewhat "self cleaning" of debris
and tend not to accumulate sand and grass clumps as readily as flat bridges.) Since deck imperfections and
debris make spread width unpredictable, we would not know whether a widened shoulder would be adequate to
contain the spread.
3) Is it possible just to have deck drains over the rip rap end bent protection in combination with a little additional
widening?: If the bridge were not flat, this could be a viable alternative. However, with debris and deck
imperfections as noted above, we cannot predict where spread will occur. If by chance, the spread occurred over
the banks where the drains were located, this would work. If it occurred in a pocket in the middle of the bridge
due to a low spot in the deck or debris accumulation, there would be no means to convey the water to the deck
drains on the ends of the bridge.
Please let me know if you still have questions and/or if this is still not sufficient justification for deck drains on bridge
108.
Thanks,
From: Herndon, Mason
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 3:19 PM
To: James, Amy E; [e-mail]; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request
Amy,
I'm still a little confused on why this change is just coming this late in the process. I understand working with existing
grades makes stormwater management more challenging and that safety is a top priority. However, I would like to have
the following additional information?
• Are you capturing and discharging stormwater water from the roadway prior to it reaching the bridge and
discharging through the deck drains?
• What other options did DOT consider before adding open deck drains and why were they not determined to be
adequate options? For example closed drainage system, widening the bridge a little more tgaccommodatethe
spread and ponding concerns and etc.
• Is it possible just to have deck drains over the rip rap end bent protection in combination with a little additional
widening?

• A
I just feel like there is someway that DOT can abide by their prior commitment of not adding additional direct
stormwater discharge into surface waters.
Thanks!
MH
Mason Herndon
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
[e-mail]
Phone:[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:32 PM
To: Herndon, Mason; brad.e.shaverausace.army mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request
Mason,
This is what we have in the draft revised mod request about the justification for new deck drains on bridge 108:
"Flat roadway grade line profiles required to meet existing bridge deck elevations have led to concerns about potential
ponding and accumulation of ice on the bridge deck along the south side barrier. To remedy this situation and improve
safety, deck drains will be installed on the south side of the bridge at 12' intervals over a distance of 276 feet."
Is that enough justification, or would we need more?
Thanks,
Amy
From: Herndon, Mason
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:04 PM
To: James, Amy E; brad. e.shaventijusace.army.mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request
Amy,
The SMP that was presented at 4C and submitted in the original application stated that there would be "no additional
surface water discharged to the deck drains on existing Bridge No. 108 over Alligator Creek." The 4B meeting minutes
state that water will be intercepted and no additional water will added to the existing deck drains on the north side of
the bridge that will be retained. It also states that there will be no deck drains on the new portion of the bridge to the
south. Are you advising us that the revised application will be adding decks drains on the new portion of the bridge? If
this is correct, will they discharge directly into the surface waters of Alligator Creek?
If my assumptions are correct, we will need a very strong explanation of why this change in commitment is required
before we can approve the modification request. It is not DWR's policy,to approve direct stormwater discharge into
surface waters. It would be very helpful if you could provide some additional information regarding this change.
Thanks!
MH
JUN 3 0 2014
DCd1MHDCITY

Mason Herndon
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
m ason. [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 1:02 PM
To: brad.e.shaverausace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: R-3601 revised mod request
Hello everyone,
You should be seeing a revised mod request for R-3601 in the next week or so (with revised utility drawings, to account
for the unauthorized Earthlink work) and the design -build team wanted me to just give you a heads up that this revision
will include adding deck drains to bridge 108 to rectify safety concerns our hydraulic unit is having with the proposed
system. We are still removing deck drains from bridge 107 (the bridge being totally replaced) and in fact there will still
be a net loss of direct drainage into Alligator Creek even with the deck drains on bridge 108.
If you have any concerns about this change that you feel will possibly result in the non -issuance of the mod, please let
me know as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Amy
Amy James
Biologist, Project Management
NCDOT Natural Environment Section
Direct 919.707-6129
aeiamesPncdot.aov
Email correspondence to and from ins sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Low and may be disclosed to Gird parties.
r

I ijntnvaV
North Carolina Department of Transportation
S[OrlSriwat�l•
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 1.2; Released September 2(111)
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Pro ect/TIP No.: R-3601 Coun les :
3runsw,ck New Hanover
Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
Project No.:
R-3601
Project Type: Roadway Widening
Date
6I9/2014
NCDOT Contact:
Karen McCauley, PE
Contractor I Desi ner:
lJoselart Kelvin on, PE
Address:
Transportation Program - Mngt Unit
NCDOT
Address:
R-3601 Project Design Manager
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
801 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 300
Ralei h, NC 27610
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone:
919-707-6611
Phone:
919-865-7390
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
joss h.kelvin on stanlec.com
CI crown:
Belville and Leland
Coun des :
Brunswick
New Hanov
River Basin(s): !Cape
Fear
CAMA County?
Yes
Yes
Primary Receiving Water: I
Brunswick River
NCDWQ Stream Index No.:
18-77
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
rime .
Class SC
Supplemental:
None
'
Other Stream Classification:
None
303 d Impairments:
I dissolved oxvqen DO
H
Buffer Rules in Effect
N/A
ea
Project Dcri lion
Project Length lin. Miles or feet):
1.67 Mi.
Surroundin Land Use: rural, tidally influenced Coastal
Proposed
Project
Existing S
te
Project
Buift-U on Area ac.
ac.
SIC.
Typical Cross Section Description:
6 lane divided highway, 10 It paved
houlders ItIrt, 6 it paved shoulders median;
4lane divided highway, approximately 10 it Devi
shoulders rtltt, 3 ft paved shoulders
grassed median, varying width
median;gmssed median varying width
Average Daily Traffic (vehlladday):
Design/Future:
ADT 2035=107 000
Existing: ADT 2
09=63,000
General Project Narrative:
Minimizing use of shoulder berm gu
ter and maintaining grass shoulder sheet flow along the causeway to the maximum extent practical.
Eliminating deck drains on Bridge 103
over the Brunswick River and Bridg
107 over Alligator Creek. At Bridge 108 existing deck drains will be retained on the left side and neN
deck drains will be added to the
widened lane on the right side. Bi
' ge 108 and 107 existing deck area with deck drains = 18.230 sq ft. Proposed bridge 108 and 107 deck
area with deck drains = 14.740 sq
ft.
O U
N
O C�7
M e�
Z U
References

R�
FW SKEET NO
�AYStantec FG
NGINEEERXGN
ENGIN Efs
DENOTES FILL IN
ED,
®
WETLAND
toS.
I.a^
�^^.. Fw^R.
INCO,
PLANS
P
SWb YO
i IV. le• A
/t .LLWnM
FRkMEl. 27605
TM. 1916) 116E,N
®
DENOTES HAND
02
FFax19192001 7ON
CLEARING
lj N— W, Fes,:
z= Q PERMIT DRAWING
FLEET-3$--6F 4A-
S TE 10 6/25/2014
•ti/
4
• a oIM1El Ee u. 0`-, . • • ,
• ,C uN.r 6 MRO GE i
• • • < s _ SEf IOC ONS I GS
f r•Jy�-.f' �. 4 ! G21C A IOCAiloa. ER T -_
Y' -109 20 T L� -3C 2i
• • • '!:. . LT- IO 69 f0 10..9N ii. OF;.. • • 4
O p J _M - w'>V J ( �� LLi-I10 1610 110 i is 1 • 't- ,
f • \ 110.4 RE, ` • O
, .ems • • \, , EMP. WORK BRIDGE u'- 60
--
U-----'--'--�--•---------.--•~---_ _ L r^m'='�'=t--_ �=•=�-__ i �----'--�-- - -L- --- w
- - w
---- L 2
f O \ N
� E. IF ,f f F f F C
_._T__—.-...._._—__. _-- - _. .--- ..__.__—._.-_.... W
N
O
s RCfJn O
_F F Q v\FILL ~ rT
> G6 Q Q g • 1 I '- iN Y✓ETLAND
WATER c1.Ev.L73' 1 f hND CLEARRJG'� \ Q
UY2/69 9d5 kH l , 1
1*#L WATER i /FILL IITLAN '' N
C EtEv. 6f9' j \ F"'
ten— I
`F J 9 tY
Z
AI
fno OF sJOCR M alli-113.15 RS
�,�r'` \ =f ,
• • • • ' • 1 • J • �\\ T. v�"`, ! /i i FILI" IN WETLANLI
f /
�./ • • ,'vil / HAND CLEARING =
• • f .•.� SXWLOEa �TRR • � • �j • ` F / j
! . • • • , ' ;Ri_,pq.21RTTT111Gz_ _.; .`,If ,;_ SITE_ 10 =
� l
4 A
9 q 7nl4 _ _ +,
JI I I • = TEMP. WORK BRIDGE / _ ' _
_
_
n�R T • • ,, REFERENCE:
FOR -UT- & -LRT - PROFILE VIEW. SEE SHEETS 19-20
x
_.: _r8.601-u[Ia xflL.-DSb_s49.dm CW25/20-L4
f

Stantec ROADWAYGm NE«GINEfNs
®
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
EE...
o0 mnii�:: zo.a�� `
\A
SUHR .NCO w?nt P=cwrAFlNaxs
p.
I
Rude 9W /•
xc
Fox.
®
DENOTES HAND
{�
TO (9191W18
(91 17U
F.,(9,9)BS,.,o2.
CLEARING
I
Mesas xn. FL 72
Q
Z
l.
PERMIT DRAWING
=
1
_ _' SHEET 29 OF 44
=
6/25/2014
3
_
,
'
_
_
♦
=
=xoxi:.� :.w%Ia9I.+ sv.0l:Ixa
=
—
ti.
,
♦ ebc penwNC.,
♦.�
TEMP. WORK
BRIDGE
w
--t ,
________ __________ _3________ ___ 3.. i
____ _____ _____ __.__ --c
__ __ __
__ _l 4 —Z w
`♦♦�
_
F... F F F F F
c
_
=_�_�
�— -- to
W
_
_
w
N
w
... ...
— F F F
-
F:
-
-
v
1
EMPADRA41 FILL
4N_ N/ETLAND x =`
Fa-
11
: ( HAND CLCAR ITfG+� \'
F
V)
E
_ -
FILL IN 1J✓ETIAND
_
,
J
FH
r
�.}�
F � �
_______—__a____ _ __ _ -- — — — — —
F
= t
3 t / '3 3 =
3 t = = 1 1+ 1
..._..—C H M...H..
Rk
\ f
o = _
= t = TEMP_ WORK BRIDGE
u
a
J
v
H
E+
1 >
1 = = 3
k FILI` IN WETLAND.
1
1 t
t
HAND CLEARING' _
I
SITE 10
l
/ 3 =
3aiECE4TD
J y, _
` AN 30 2014,
3
REFERENCE: 1/"
FOR -LLT- & -LRT- PROFILt VIEW. SEE SHEETS 19-20
r3601_prm_wet_psh_s09.dgn 6/25/2014 12:17:30

Stantec
R-360f 1 10
RM' S„EETNO.
ROADWAY OELGN
NYGP Ucs
5lanbc LcnflMylg SeMon lrc.
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
W 1 Janes F.nWRI RaA
Suite JW
RWm"'NC'T
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
Ln
Te1.(919)EE1-E.955
pp XM u¢
ncOuulTroN
Fy (919)951-t0]0
nwv.s1anlec. tan
UiG Se N¢F-072 ) z
Q
�
Y Y
z 4
k
R�JIE 4
Q1
Z
1
4 '
Y '
'
PERMIT DRAWING
-SHEET
,
4
,
NY•Vh
,
35 of44
4 Y
,
4
6/9/2014
k
Y
i
k
Y
z
k
-
.
— `
F
yY
--
F
136E
E
E
O
- HAND CLEARING-- `
\\_ F
�
TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND-
-'
FILL IN WETLANq.�
_
---
_
441
---
HAND CLEARING
HAND CLEARING
�k f 1,T
HAND CLEARING
4
f
S K Y
A
HAND CLEARING
JUN 3 0 2014
vYl€ i 1
�\
4
DCM-MADCITY
C
ITC
11
SITE 10
3C:
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
®
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING

® Stantec
Slams[ CmauhN SeMaa Inc.
801 Jann F2nk Road
SNhm
Ryagh NC 27K
T.1 (9;i as,-08fi5
F¢ (919) 85" M
a—d"aMec.mn
( U.Ida, W FMi] 1
NO.
IINCOMPLETE PLANS
ro xm w aax f x romarwx
i PERMIT
WING
)F 44
t
F
F — _
1
F
L
S '
In -or
y
0 ` HAND CLEARING
__-
C TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND. — — —" �--- - - ----�\
FILL IN WETLAND, -- f
J
U F,
Y HAND CLEARING ,
i HAND CLEARIN6�, - -�
F
r
i
i i #
�d Y
HAND
CLEARING
HAND CLEARING
y
i
s
ly
�
1
i 1
I
*
i
SITE 11
` i #
QQ
v
RECEWED
JU N 3 0 2014 4ACM-MftD CITY
1 DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
1601 -aoe n a10.OgnE 141

ITE 1 ITE 1
..... .. .... .... ..... .....
r3641_ rdy_xpl_LRT 32.dgn_6/2/20.1.4 12:46;1

112+50.00
TEMPORARY FILL
fo_:._.....:........:._....:_...:------ ..:........ :......:..:......_.;........;......_:..._ ..... m..
........:...._..:........°.........:...._...:........;_.....
N�'7
--——--- - ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... .... — ...._..
_ _.... ..... ..... ..... ..... .._. ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ......
sz�, —Lt.
1S0 140 130 120 lio 100 9A 90 70 4o 4p $0 20 10 011) zo 30 4D Sp 4t7%1 9.0 loo 110 120 130 140 150
- --
_
r3601_rdyxpl_LLT_34.dgn
6/2/2014 12:44:04

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
Site
Station
Structure
CAMA
Permanent
404
Permanent
F411 In
Temp.
F 11 In
Excavation
4 n
Temp
Excavation
Mechanized
an
Clearing
in
Permanent
SW
Temp.
SW
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Natural
Stream
No.
(Fromlro)
Size / Type
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
in Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
impacts
(ac)
impacts
(ac)
Permanent
(ft)
Temp.
(ft)
Design
(ft)
1
-Y2- 13+05
48" DRAINAGE PIPE
0.01
< 0.01
47
10
2
-LMED- 54+37 TO
54+75 RT
24" DRAINAGE PIPE
< 0.01
< 0.01
0.02
3
64+43 LT &'LMED
65+92 TO 66+26 LT
BRIDGE 24" DRAINAGE
PIPE
0.03
< 0.01
1 < 0.01
1 0.04
4
76+31 LT & -LMED-
74+99 TO 75+19 RT
ROADWAY FILL/36"
DRAINAGE PIPE
0.04
< 0.01
< 0.01
0.16
5
-LMED- 83+00 TO
83+21 RT
EXISTING DRAINAGE
PIPE
<0.01
<0.01
6
-LRT-85+81 TO 87+69
RT
ROADWAY
0.01
7
-LLT-90+25 TO 90+74
LT & -LLT- 94+00 TO
94+21 LT
ROADWAY
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
8
-LLT- 99+60 TO 99+97
LT
30" DRAINAGE PIPE
< 0.01
0.01
9
-LRT- 101+06 TO
101+17RT
EXISTING DRAINAGE
PIPE
<0.01
10
-LLT- 111+79 TO
113+14 RT & -LRT-
112+37 TO 114+59
BRIDGE 108 & BRIDGE
107
0.14
0.03
0.10
11
-LRT- 115+52 TO
118+61 RT & -LRT-
121+21 TO 121+77 RT
ROADWAY
0.03
ROADWAY/36"
+ +
< 0401
44
13
-Y- 36+10 LT
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
14
14
-Y- 38+30 RT
ROADWAY I
< 0.01
TOTALS':
0.03 10.34
0,04
0.02
0.04
0.38
0.03 1
<0.01
105
47
0.00
`Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
1. Permanent bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.G4 acres
2. Temporary bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.02 acres
3. There will be 0.38 acre of hand clearing on this project. Additionally, there will be 0.04 acre of temporary fill in wetlands for erosion
control measures in hand clearing areas. There will also be a <0.01 acre (165 sq. ft.) of temporary fill in CAMA wetlands for erosion
control measures in hand Gearing areas.
2013 ION
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
R-3601 6/17/2014
BRUNSWICK AND NEW HANOVER COUNTY
US 17-74-76 FROM NC 133/SR 1472 INTERCHANGE
TO US 421 / NC 133 INTERCHANGE
EET 44 OF 44
rJu
RECEIVED
N 3 0 2014
DCAf-liHD CITY

WETLAND PERMIT IN
WETLAND IMPACTS
PACT SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER
Site .
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
ac
Temp,
Fill In
Wetlands
ac
Excavation
in
Wetlands
ac
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac
He
Clea
in
Wetlands
a
Ing
Permanent
SW
impacts
ac
Temp.
SW
impacts
ac
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
ft
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
ft
Natural
Stream
Design
ft
1
73+52 TO 73+94
U/G Tel & CATV lines
I 0.
1
2
79+32 TO 79+73
U/G Tel & CAN lines
I <0
1
3
84+95 TO 85+05
U/G Tel & CAN lines
<0,
1
4
93+31 TO 90+64
U/G Tel & CAN lines
<.01
<0.
1
5
95+69 TO 95+94
U/G Tel &CAN lines
<0
1
6
100+59 TO 101+50
1 U/G Tel & CATV lines
<0.
1
7
107+05 to 107+47
U/G Tel & CAN lines
<0.
1
8
114+93to115+07
U/GTel&CANlines
<0.
1
9
15+1T01115+66
U/GTel&CANlines
<0.01
10121+24to21+18
U/GTel&CANlines
<0.
1
TOTALS:
70.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.
3
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
RMseE YAMS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BRUNSWICK AND NEW HANOVER COUNTII
TIP PROJECT (R-3601)
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet I-;k- of

RECEIVED
JUN 80 7014
DCM-mm Crff

m
STATE OF NORTH H[ CA O LINA
aNa X. M.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
143l
MO X
NOo[)eURN
1
U UTILITY DRAWING PLANS4
I
N ' y
BE L4� y' 1]t
Q
BR U11 tS WICK AND z
EW-- [NOy - Z`z3U1QTlE5
-
17
}
LOCATION: US 17-74-76 FROM NC 133 / SR 1472 INTERCHANGE
W
m, Ro CT < P
CT
TO THE US 421 INC 133 INTERCHANGE
O
"
TYPE OF WORK RELOCATE UTILITY LINES
I
�
- txED- POT srA. 85+E0e3 BR =
VICINITY MAP
JLT- sr sTA. Z MAU AN
-LRr- ST $TA, 85+8J.61 AN
BRIDGE
BEGIN TA.
END
108
-UT- STA. ]OB+79.86 BRIDGE NO. 108
A
mom
-LMg0. STA. R3+93.50 (LT. LN)
BRIDGg No
BRIDGE NO.105
BI
aacnv BRIDGE9
-LMED- STA.55+93.50 (LT.LN.)
Off,
6 8
-
a
BEGIN Goxs2Rucrrox
-Y- STA. I7+83.00
`u
�-
5 �
-LMELI us v-�¢ 6 nc 133
- -
�
=Y A
L[p
I -Y2- STA.Ii+ORM N / END CONSTROCTTON
1 � v - 7.41+
BEGIN CONSTRUC77ON
-RPCY- STA.22+00.00
A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
OF LELAND AND BELVILLE.
GRAPHIC SCALES
so zs q so 1qo
PLANS
so 2s 4 so 1po
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 10 0
P OFILE VERTICAL)
r
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
TITLE SMWT
2 THUR 3A
PROFILE SREETS
4 THRU 12
UTILTIY DRAWING SHEETS
BRIDGE NO.103
(TO
UTILITIES OWNER
END TIP
1- AT&T
2- ME WARNER CABLE (TWC)
3- EARTXIJNR
4- MCNC
5- PROGRESS ENERGY (DISTRIBUTION)
6- ATMC
7- ARUNS07CK REGIONAL HZGO WATER AND SEWER
T.LP. NO, SHEET NO.
R-3601 1
REVISED 06/10/2014
til
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet LOt_1--7--
0-
SR 1352
(RATTLESNJP
JU14 3 Q 2014
I I
DCM•M�D M
INCOMPLETE PLAN
W N V M R1W ACpY o
PRELIMINARY PLAi
pp Yp[ vss .v0. CYX.,'.I,CMN
SEA1 PREPAAEU IN 1ffi OPPICd (W:
DIVISION OF JUGRWAYS
UTILITIES UNIT
UTLLnZS ENGINEERING
IJ➢I AI.JE SERVCES MT'ER
R.JLSIJ.I( M JIe 10)
0 PEW (JO) Ml�"
G T FAX fJK)1J0..RJI
Rees WmJ,i wn PA 1771LDW SECTION ENGD.EM
Cent/ BXX,PX.4 P.B. unU21ES SQUAD LEADER PROJECT ENG➢PEER
K&EmnO UnLRIDS PRUJECT DESIGNER

M1C
REVISED 6/10/2014
PROPOSED U/G TEL. LINE PROFILE
PRELIMINARY
BORE DETAIL - PROFILE VIE` 1
BRIDGE
E STIN I GROI NO - BRIDGS 9R I➢G'e
�o
o........ ...:.... ........ .. ........ .... ........ ... ,... ... ... .... ._ ... .. .... .... ...
-o .. .. ,,. ., ... .., ... ,. .... .. ... .. .. ..,. ..��
as ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ...._.. ........ .-...... ...... ........ ......., ........ ........ ....... ._,. ... .... .....,.. ... .... .... ... .... ... ... .. .... .... ,. -n
UB 0 I AD
...... ,PRG OSED U.{a:.. L ...� .GATV LTNE. .... ... ...... ... .... .: ....... .. _..... .. ...... ..... ...... a
u'
-ro ...... ....... .. ... ... .:.„ 1. ... .. ..... .. ... .. ..... :. .... ... ., s,: .. .... ... ......: ...... ..... ... ...... ..... :... .. ..: .. ... ...: .. .. . ..... .':
.a-k 55^0 SI+OJ '_'� Sd.09 59�4C Stirc,
SOUNDINGS OF THE BRUNSWICK RIVER WERE RECORDED
AT BOTH BRIDGES, BUT WERE PERFORMED ON THE UPRIVER
SIDE OF THE BRIDGES ONLY, ACTUAL DEPTH AT 60FT OFFSET
FROM BRIDGE 15 UNKNOWN THEREFORE IT WILL BE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO RECORD DEPTH AND MAINTAIN
MINIMUM 20FT BELOW EXISTING GRADE ACROSSRIVER,
AND MAINTAIN A MINIMUM DEPTH OF LOFT BELOW SURFACE
INSIDE DELINEATED WETLANDS.
ow¢ woF ra-
JRECEIVED
UN 3 0 2014
n!'.M.-MHD CITY
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet 2 ofJ ?-_

REVISED 6/10/2014
PROPOSED U/G TEL. LINE PROFILE
PRELIMINARY
BORE DETAIL - PROFILE VIEW
.HG'Mft
1NCWfPLETE
�a
PREIAMINARI
...
......... ....... ......... ..... .... ...... ...
..... ...................
..... .... .....
...........
..........
.... ............
....
...
....
....
....
....
..
.........
BR
OGE
m
d:.....
.:..
... ...
.....
.. r.
.....,.
4.......
.:..
EXI
TING
ROUN
�o
:'.......
......
... ..
....
........
....
.. .....
x:r:m
.....
........
...
o..
..
.....
.......
.:....
....
-
..
,r..
....
....
....
....
.,.,
...�
.,..
.,
....
....
....
.,,.
..,
,...
..,.
....
....
..
,...
>o
(1r:4
-
S,�
3 GRA
'�
'.
...
.. _:..
.......
..
.....::
...
......
...
....
........
...
..
..
.. .
CAI
ldA
..
«i
° .....
....:
...
:.:.
..
.......:
....
.....
....
....
...:....
.
,�
...
......:.
..
...
..
.......:
...r.
......
,.r..
.. ...
.r., ...
.,.....
.. ..,..
......
.....
... ..
.,......
... ..:
... r.
......
... ..
....
,.,....,
..
. ......
......
... ....
......
..,...
... ...
m
E . W
6::A
8}N &l.Y]
L5.90
SOUNDINGS OF THE BRUNSWICK RIVER WERE RECORDED
AT BOTH BRIDGES, BUT WERE PERFORMED ON THE UPRIVER
SIDE OF THE BRIDGES ONLY, ACTUAL DEPTH AT 60FT OFFSET
FROM BRIDGE IS UNKNOWN THEREFORE IT WILL BE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO RECORD DEPTH AND MAINTAIN
MINIMUM 20FT BELOW EXISTING GRADE ACROSSRIVER
INSIDE DELINEATED WETLANDS,
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet �ot_ r
Owc oz_OF oa_
AYya.a•
JUN 3 0 014

-------------------------
noxcr urera<e Ho. �Har Ro. -
� 7.0
LAUNCH PIT
8
U/0 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE ---
CA TV (EAR7NUAW) LINE
5
f -LMED- Sto. 55+50 +/-
0
I
0
g 8 �
.Q E IAl1NCH PIT
g 5
s W U/6 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE
s
NO CHANGE
BRUNSWICK RIVER CROSSING
HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
PROFILE VIEW
o. ♦'.':.'.'.----
: '.
.:� . . y D ARE m RECENIIJG %1
D BORE
(11 41NCH HDPE SDR I
EQUIPPED WITH (2) 1.25 INCH HOPE SOR It
AERIAL VIEW
4A4®-Sta. 67+25+/-
BRIDGE —US 17 N/US 74 EM 76 E/NC 133N— — — — —
m I
.c,'OAIPLM PLANS
tEIAMINARY PLA\8
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 2111,4
AN Y. (1) A INCH HDPM E SDR 11 DI -mm CITY
CANEERED
1
PAGE NOIS;
EQUIPPED
WITH (21 1.25INCH
HDPESDR I I
TEMPLAR,
�
SELYILLE. NC
R
TI-122
l
wJ THESE PtldISARE
o'
MRE DR
PROPRIETARYAND RNAty
DI.1
'-
INC3255
i
SUfTE: C
NOT BE REPROOIICEOR
W B1vINGTON. NC 28d03
N)S
R-3601
wsCLO^.aE� WITHOUT
wwilErl cousEnr.
1
I
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet `I II
pt_ �
S�
I
,

----------------------
NIGRCT UPIMCI NO. ! W W.
-_"M 1A
NO CHANGE
L.<
PRE
ALLIGATOR CREEK CROSSING
DIR€CTICMAL 6l; N I
- -HORIZOWAL
PROFILE VIEW
ART -Sim 107+00+/-
4.Ri-Slo. I I6+00+/-
US 17 N/L6 74 FJL676 E/NC 133N
I I
LIS 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 E/NC 133N
7.0
US 17 N/US 74 ENS 76 E(NC 133N - BRIDGE
7A
•
,r
LAUNCH PIT
h
pBORE
_✓
�� RECEMNG PR
O
D BORE 871 FEET +/_ D BORE
�M,!
U/G CAN (EARTHLINK) LINE
c
y
(I ) 41NCH HDPE SOP 11
3
EQUIPPED WITH (2) 1251NCH HOPE SDR I I
fi
AERIAL VIEW
F
a
' S
{Ri-Sim 107+00+/-
-LRT S1¢ 116+C0+/-
4
-
— — — — — —US 17 NJUS 74 EAIS 76 E/NC 133N—
US 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 EINC 133N - BRIDGE
—US 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 E/NC 133N— — — — — —
-
_
0
4
I � TU
DgpRE�LAUNGH ORED BORE
/0 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE RECEMNG PIT RECENED
c
I � c I,
S W (1) 41NCH HDPESDR I I JUN 3 O 2014
ENGINE8ZED AND A Y EQUIPPED WI1H (2) 1.25 INCH HOPE SDR it
^ TL. ti..� d..� PAGE NOTES: I - nw otW Ro.
rc 1 L:.1� 4-� 4.1 U4i BELW.LE NC TF 122 ao THESEvuRS Arff D
IROPPoEfARY ANp SR4LL
D1.1 IMHp CITY
1 ���' 3255 MILL DRY Bi PIiDJER l0.M�ER NOT BE REPROWCE Oft �-
i SUffE C Nt9rIDY0 tumour
WIL�IINGTON NC?8403 NTS R-W) WPoTTEN wr6ENr.
I ¢'
I
I
I �
I g
Utility Permit Drawing
SheetI �
I E.
I 3+
I _
I ='
I s

Utility Permit Drawinq
Sheet _(,:_of_ t } �, JUN 3 0 2014
DCM.MHTI rrry

Pls Sto 22+98.34
-L LED-
P1 Sto 49+95.43 PIS Sto 74+98,35
Bs = 0' 45' 00.0'
0 = 38'09 OOA' (RT 1 95 = 0' 45' 00.17
Ls = 200.00,
D = O' 45' 00.0' Ls = 20OLC
LT = 133-53'
L = 5A66.67' LT = 13333'
ST = 56.67'
T = 2.650.47' ST = 66.67'
N 53' 59' 13.8' E (BACK)
R = 7.639.44'
SE = OD3
y�
R
+
I
\ d C Dit�X
X X X
X. 60'CMX � O]rC
CYRILL F. THOMAS, E.T U%
OR 836 PG 720
N0. wrH hOwERR
AUTERx __... ...r ,roBvcrrrnn
17-74-76
10
rro
Cur
P1 Sto 12*59.51
PIS Sto 15+33.49
PI Sto 20+IL50 PIS Sto 23+68.76
p = f 07' 428 (LT)
Os = 0' 47' 44.4-
0 = IT 55, o79 (LT) es = 2'02 96.6'
D = 0' 47' 44.8'
As = 2' 02' 47A'
D = 2' 02' 46e Ls = 200.00
L = 518,30'
Ls = 200A0
L = 58328' LT = 13334'
T = 259.51'
LT = 1469'
T = 292.70' ST = 66,67'
R = 7.2W,00'
ST = 8535'
R = 2.800DO'
SE = 0.05
BEE PROFILE SHEETS
�x
-LAZED- POC St I+ 0.00- . *-L61C. 33+00 fl x
.RPAY- ��Sr : 1 _ 00 (I6'LT)
/NEW TIME WARNER ______.____ v '..
BORE PIT \ .Coos wrap
NEW TIME WARNER _
— — HANDHOLE fi MQf CA
Ff 6HE£
7.
.: a 91 RAlMMN[uBi Sa w`i NY E *5 CG 9/1/O 'EIr yt
O GiOT 3 wNtT
l��j BG
P AE'y�R� x * CS=R�a4R Aai Sef SrEEl 9\
3'Lili Sfiif-xd!'T .•.•- mot^' �}}}t
y �. N f01 .ECHC
CW
'* .. . .. . * -LNED- POC Sm. 33+:500= *
THE DISTRIBUTION POWER LINES
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
!Raft. ""Na ND.
s.W "c'
ANDREW JACKSON BRIDGE
WILL BE RAISED BY DUKE ENERGY IF
ROAD'"AV DGWN
f.NDINeeB
NCDOT'S CONTRACTOR DETERMINES
THE LOWEST CONDUCTOR IS
RSCYiMpi;£'Ci
NOT 20' ABOVE BRIDGE GIRDER
REVISED 06/10/2014
I.) FOR -ZMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET 14.
2.) FOR -LiWD- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHEET
OADWAY
m STANDARD DRAR7.YGS, STD.1V0. 865.8I,
SHEET I FOR SPECIAL MEDIAN GR- DJNG.
4)77B PROPOSED APPROACH SLAB
TO MUSTENG APPROACH SLAB. _
NEW TIME WARNER
AND EARTHLINK �.
IN CONDUIT WITH
NEW AT&T BORE a
—�-
F_ x
.a. *
D
�RUE,cfi
_i P.F CFMiER TEST
yR B,I i R xE0. 59.89.5
9l'
ODELL iVANS. JR.. ET U%
DB T61 PG 38. , MECWNBRUNiMCK RIVS am * * �n 'T j
r GB i50 PG T16 / 0 I .� I _ -` *�` \^ I , C✓ A
YOf CnB.S PG * f t ii PRWCSED HAND xOu 1 \ �\
URBAN SMART GROWTH BELVR_LE. LLC I DIf•xDIEIDR iIEM Ia11,UB'HOPE SDR II * 3
uiEa ?B>IK. IOB l * x x S
.* Y - ROIW®FMMUNK •.I ' - __yR� *�'.l '?f � x
CI1]Tx01f WRIT TOWN OF BELv4LE J��"'�/'�.n ry x x*
Be 5A PG 'V
lvs zT
Ma x * r
B'%'C § ry URB<N GA14 M 20OPC 113 8CL`:0.LE. LlC * * * * * Y 1
P 9 R—E�l iC -r0.35.'YIS 1950 Y4R♦.� r K Y
RN
w -- `' T � IiOWN!'_T TRP a �"L` ' I* * x x * x * \\
.n _ 'RfP-_l' ,BSY - EEF TWP __�� '. x d 1 U O
\$.'RCPOPE[t.W1 F -_ * * t a
W SSRCx'SEW •�- DFECTrvyy� EP —�� 1' * x x
> _
's
* MUNN
I* x
Utility Permit Drawing
THE LOWEST CONDUCTOR ALONG _ p'=MB R. * * * A, *--Sheet -L Of
DUKE ENERGY TRANSMISSION POWER --* ' * * * * * * --L—
Ia�6 LINES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE * *
— A. Am -°''�P '�, -� ANDREW JACKSON BRIDGE ARE 20' *
ABOVE THE BRIDGE GIRDER ,' A,
x : A,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

• • P
YOIK' N!I.ENQ YO. $M(!T NO,
nOApwAr �lxcN MWM411Kf
FNGINlCI
35
lNCIIN!!R
f9s SO 22+98.34 4, S1a 6' 00' 04B es Sfo 7 5 06.0'
LS = 0' 45' 00.0' = 38' 00' OOA' lRTI 8s = 0' 45' Ob.O' ...,,.L„,
L 1 LT ' 1200 = 5D66E7'.0' T _ 13333' 1 �'@�i�'_� -
ST = 66.67' T = 2.630.47' ST = 66E7' 3+ ;dlltilX: 7'
N 53'59'13.8'E !BACK) R = 7.639.44' REVISED 06/10/2014
I aW,mr �m xwmnRrnux^
E7 SE = 0q3
PROP. U/0 TEL.
& CATV LINES
NOTES:
Z i 1.) FOR--LbfED- PROFILE SEE sREETS 14 AEVD 15.
* i SEE PROFILE SHEETS * * i 2) FOR-LMF.D- BRIDGE SRETw SEE SHEET I-M.
* * * * $ * x STANDARD DRAWINGS, STD. NO.865.01,
x A SKEET 1 FOR SPECIAL MEDIAN GRADING.
A) FOR STRUCTURE PLANS SEE STRUCTURE
* PLAN SHEETS S-X THRU S x
NTIME WARNE NEW HANOVER SOIL R WATER CONSERV MST * * * * i I
* * AWD EARTNLI NK * * * * * A
N i oR nu Fc nc
I * * rEW ATD TWIT
I
a A,
I � \ x < RE * * * PROP. U/G CAN
* * IR.•
-NEW TIME WARNER x * i
BORE PIT * *
C * Q W * \ 'CL Iuw
MY 2oNEW TIME WARNER
* w. - fl EQ ` i,F—=�"n+•:•——tfr.°xr — — �HANDHOLE
• I i * x i uR*uA rK _ -�`-- F Y< Wm Err ---E 'V' � �.a;:-;r __ —
we .* n
--
9$T •4
SET "���F F
p m �)� •s p v ---- a. - ST, GUI +71
E
C NCP.E BeRw
ME
.64+lp
uFn !e• v �esr e.dc rr --- — .Rs''y
f \ — � WrR •� e�j, I
11ry�j�Ij .m� 1 * ¢ u F 190GN
M� -
xdi
Wr n.x+Mir�� R �9 r�W.rF.n _ _ F,L,p¢ ./k..,- * * i �#ti...�..':.L`:. _::n:✓ti.�-'ry ".'� A
\ IL %� x i {j NSC SWL \4 uw u! •.� � �+-✓ Fllagf®MAlHuru � •3f1 A�
i i �.�1 If�l]TEpPE XM II "I,*i WN OFC'K Sif3
A \ i
—_ Q SITE 1- 0.009 AC
- WATER LEVEL \ \ E PRC)P 1UNSV/K'R OVER SORE
ELEV-1.29' Q \!'� i fR Fp1M1E fMlFU Fllp(ISlp NAVD NOIf
A/28/2009 \r�, pT IIIW'EbFF SCR I I NW m IN lar'SCR III
130 PM
*
z '� \\\ a F 'DENOTES -FILL IN
9 ..\ WETLAND
o \`RE
I
DENOTES HAND JUN 3 2014
CLEARING
DCM-WDCnY
I m
Utility Pe mit Drawinq
v 1PTNWE<T TWG �� --� of 6E

nroncr
NC.
REVISED 06/10/2014
PIS Sto 22+98.34
z
P1 Sto 49+95.48
P15 Sto 74+98.35
65 = a 45' 00D'
4, = 38'0d OOD' (RT)
BS = 0.45' 00.P
-LLT-
Ls = 20OD'
D = 0'45'00.0'
Ls = 2xw
Pls SIG 87*13.96
Pt Sto 92*4545
Pis Sia 97+76J9
LT = 13333'
L = S1X>6bT
LT = /33.33'
J2.rn
... ; c
Bs = P 45' 00D'
4, = 6 58' 00.0'(LT)
6s = 0' 45' OOD'
ST = 66b7'
T = 2.630.47'
ST = 66.67'
�^-
Ls = 2001001
=
Ls - 203
N 53' 59' 13.8' E (BACK)
R = 7.639.4,P
- .µ. Y,,,,
°
"" "
LT = 13333'
245''
L
L = 92889'
LT = J3'
SE = OD3
«N, , -
ST = 6667'
T = 465D2
S7 = 66b7'
66.67'
w,. D- vvz
S 86' 30' 46.2E (BACK)
R = 7.639.44'
-IxlC-i5 t•.p to fiw to-p
Iw M
SE = ODS
-Lwk"?9'4 B]-p 10 Ss-p
w1EDj 1
iLF 3TR .e-n110 Rk9S-p ;Rt)
PpOP.
U/0 CATV
'iryy
�
r
k
a
+
}
}
a
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
.D xvr m..v.
.rnmlrea.
PRELIMIN
RY PLANS
Iw x w
tcevenke nax
+ k + }
k
I
}
tS.iu<*ION-------^--_ _ _ _ /* -W. --"-�-`^-`--n _ --L8La T6-7 7,4Si7 $iC4.6'8L11-�8YXWME Mtsx LLYD T9
E-80.�L787y+r.
�.Dpf
i t
r MtOLW v wo, 1 Y Y Y * ART TA 85+88.63 AN (46' T.) 1f DtINL DILCx
it ue orklu * Y..r_. I�... _ } -------- - - -- --
W
�' _ bD _ _ "` _ SITE 2- 0.004 AC _ - - -- - v
_ —
+ an
m 3Bn R .9 eSI
RE ET us os.vs rvv.vs revr news xen g r<fDnvorcx n _ - ` �1
EXIST.- --\ n es r, s. m-... svi ss xesi y
—a=
^t LAIEIY 9 w Be' a ."
I ,.envy ^ ___—_——..__—__ < —_•s. , ran .rr _ _
°c'm66+06 -LMED-
__
r ___ _ P«�If�N.7S+3 -LM P' i 9+ -L - -- ---- V
SB' �'�-.� L--'�... ""..... J4^' } 1° k Y * rfaouo uanNrrt "I•R•�✓ REMOVE EXIST. w
w
H aea +
I—cce*N.our I } �`^ nwrmmrwWxuxn S -') f4 Y ' .Y 1'n
.LHSD- CS SM 74+31.69
mmrs wssoawrm wrx * Y -LRT- P07 Ssa. 85+N0.63
EMMx m6ikC0YlfwfLr45 Y _I
Y } * SITE 3= 0.0001 AC 1
I I rt( Of a wl. _
�-------------- I.1
%
F DENOTES FILL INk
w WETLAND
s — Utility Permit Drawing
i DENOTES HA Sheet—q_of
a
G
NOTES: JUN $ 2014
o afr aF eEl-vw''E LNxxoxN 1.) FOR -LMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET 1S.
l.) FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET I&
-~ 3.) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET Is. DCM-. CITY
I 5
I
I �

,"ACT 0129210 No. lNIF:
R-3601 7
REVISED 06/ 10/2014 ff.rv°1e
Pls Sto 22+9834 PI Sto 49*95.49 P/s Sta 74*98.35
e5 = 945' 00D' A = 38'OC 00.0' (RT) es = O 45' 00.0' -LLT-
Ls = 200.00' D = a45'OOfY Ls = 200A0' P ,Ll Pis S7° 87+1396 PI Sto 92+4565 Pis Sto 97+76J9
LT = /3333' L = SA66bT LT = /3333' ...m r i30;.',,, , 'cn ,,,�. _ LI es - 0' 45' 0017 L = 6' 58' COD' (LT/ eS = 0' 45' OOD'
ST = 66b7' T = 2b30.47' ST = 66.67' �- 0" Ls = 200.W D = 0' 45' 00.0' Ls = 200AD"
N 53' 59' 13B' E (BACK) R = 7.639.44' a'.w- s.: ° va w LT = 133.33' L = 928B9' LT = 13393'
SE = OD3 '^. - - ST = 666T T = 965A2' ST = 66bi'
w D. vuL S 86' 30' 46.2E (BACK) R = 7b39.44'
SE = OD5
-Lw Vr M-m TO srw Tf-0 ��DD)� 9
-l*YS 4f4!!+m TO SrA M W lMEDI
'i -LLT- ft0. !!-!I TO ftA, 0!-°0 flil
PROP. U/D CATV
T
L k iq
)(]{j{j � � Y 3 ��. 3 ' 24w✓.rtiy� y i k x I 4 3 Y
Y
�0 .
3
n.
x�u M sW-w l RLnifaa. e 3 Y x j -LLT- - Sin. 8Jr80.63 8� L� winos Y '�� 3 \ 1 3 °0
R� 3 * 1 - c:eR.wm�-LLTTA.87+
PIJL' , 85 6. i8A9 BF� lti
_ cNN v or[N • \\
ruow+ v ortcry Y * * iRT- PDT 7A. 8J+80.6? AN (46' 7.J ife oeruL L C
f@ z XL L y _ . _ - 1. !:.: 1 _ .•ytM.F..�yP-�yKy,.rG^' z_ _ _ _ t
I
h P I X --_ -- ,». ---- SITE 2a 0.004 AC
F ..
--
+ RSET uses- usraw.us rswic°ss fa m+ y _ _ s� y wIDJN V °I n \
z. o v _
n EXTST. u ui ns r,e r+., zsw- ns xas. = h
h:✓1-. — �— — — —u a —tea._ _b __� - — n— _�—o— o- _.--rr� �a
tout rsHIZ P.t e ✓ Y: C 9V 30' 48.2" E
.3� -e _� _ _ _ _-- _ _353—
IN'as:,,w,y ssn I usn..us >.c.us rai.xc ,ss Bb+OS -LMED- ue Y 1
�l —
I— - �.ea- — y.— m
-LMED P / 79+7 L — — —_—--...,aws�"# "=LM _ -- - -
z „. _ _
h►jl (is _ _ _ _
!aa ' + so' J . _, tu-�W-�„q:r _ 3 \ Y ,ROPOS!°1M111JNF ' a RSMDV6 SXIST. W
x � .\ (41uroremRll t_ GL'ARDRAIZ
i✓ Q � �r `-s• t Y i (v '; l„�j✓ '+-.., .�.a/_'_-__Y ____ � __ �u_____.-^. t
-ZMED- CS sa 74+31.68 y 3 (4 t]PXOR[!°R II �J" "'�✓' 1
Y
I I mp,rs .� fp°xTFI, nrx • y t * 3 y / - I !"5
I ffniK+ Nf17.mW ixQ1rE5 1 x • },J
3 x SITE 3= 0.0001 AC
.ill B LVk 1
1
* I
W �
I LJ
F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND w.R=a
_ Utility Permit Drawing
3 Sheet—Lpot f}
DENOTES HAND- f� JUN 0 7 4
I Q, ®E-i. E I N G
I �
c° CIrI OF BELVILLE __ D M-lOr�tii97TV
_�-- unxnawN 1.) FOR -LMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET IS.
1 c ®- t) FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET Id.
I vo
3.) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 18.
I
INCOMPLE E PLANS
wa R„r v,a rax
. . umrax
PRELIMIN
ftY PANS
m xoT w ro
.m+nw

IKO: CT UNKENO NO. SHEC"
R-360/ 1 i
KM' SXEE- NO.
Y/s STO H<tlJ.
0' 00.0'
r fura YZt4pbJ
YIs xa Y(K9�gJs'MIT:H
PIS Sr°, y6t
.42 Pl S)a 101+49J1 Pis Sra 105+7965
eS = 45'
p = 6- 58' Cuo.
45' �A'
Bs - Zl'3r�''
b p = 6' 58' OOD' (LT)
eS = P 45' 00.0'
Ls = 200.00'
D = O' 45' 00.0
-
D = 0' 45' OOD'
Ls = 200D0'
LT = 13333'
L = 92869'
°
r ** LT = i ;, P
L7 = 139.3 '
L = 928B9'
LT = 13333'
ST = 6667'
T = 465D2'
w. �T VA166,67'
ST = 66.67'
T = 465.02'
ST = 6667'
S 86' 30'462' E (BACK)
R = 7.639.44'
R = 7.639-44'
SE = 0.05
-E:T- nA K5-sE To nA, K5-9s IKII
SE = OD25
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
Ka Nor AA 5aa
"rnmrcma
PRELIMINARY
m T,m w
PLANS
cwamKmam
N
OL
DENOTES FILL IN -�
WETLAND
ED 0-6-t-1D-/_2-01
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
3 8 PROP. U/9 CATV y
ig ) A Y f Y f fR f 3 Y 3 3 3 3 j + R✓ {�
* * Y * } * VV a Lf
f I I * 3 x * 3 Qfl x
* x I NEW HKNOVER SOIL & WATER CQVSERV WSi
I * * OR 1722 PG 776 f
r I Y * Y Y z }*
x
I Y Y Q
f t 1 Y x
x a I.
f x Y f 1.4
x z f f Y • t Y
I I -. Q rsi.t Rn r Y Y Y Y } x Y x } W
CLEANI
{C S Vf W CL E V Ah°
. }a.-..-f -
.o°°s * r Y _ _ _ * _ION W. 6 9 v
T- SC Sra. 87+ .69 ( .. _ .. 1 _ r'
I Y x Q 3 (.j-LLT--rCS St. 97+OM2 " h
� f Y� x -- -
- e•e c it Mf * *-__z___w____KnJ_______
x en s �rHs iI
JRJ.zTCNs___ - LLT T Sm +09.i2
- tJ-y _ ams `-^✓`a+p� mTmrdp_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -F-- aso. �:E ..
F
1�
—' -- _ _ _ _ _ _ yW" a
TN^T.c
I n _ 4 �-------- " RSMOVF
14
Car- — — --- ------------------ 4t 1
l'M
[r Mk' Y DRYN Vy� a5a t�
-i ,••` • GRI$� _ 5[E OEiAM1: a80 MIOIM v INTCH, I SI, M Y F
�— w� seE DITM E see on.ul —
F — — m�a � SITE 2 --g----g --- �?
,� r------- e° F J—AC KE.:cYt
SAD
�+
Y"R5"
.m
90+6 .- . LR - - -
PKavosm EMMI➢IK�
�3�
_ _ — ��
— -- _-
F
----_—_— —
"'F
7
KV
*
EARTHLkIh.;;.,,:;r
X.,wXaE #iANDHOE_. - * �* * i
-
' _ _ �KEdFFiSR�^^•—*_c e
1
m
'
°F LVILL
SITE q=
005 C
-LRT- TS Sm. I+$4.09 95+6 -LRT-
r
}
}
* {
0. (FILL)
—* —
--
TOWUCFEEN TKP
+
$6o'uva vsrrron
d
_ --�
IIEOPWFO EARMLINK
f x' *
f
—
F LVIL-IA
f
x
e: .A.%-
SC Sic %+84.09
i 1 r
i
+
Ln
*
z f f f
* y
SITE 6= 0.032 AC
3
f 3 f *
Y 3
Y
* *
f f t
Q
x Y 3
f t
I
0 20 4
3 f
+ ' xp
Utility Permit Drawing
Slleet_J L_.Of �}
OT'M
F�2�)
!.)FOR -LLT-PROFILE SEE SXEET /6.
1 =
FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 78.
I 30
I y
I

3
!f!RlNCR N°. I RRv. No
'�3601 9
DENOTES FILL IN,
WETLAND
ENOTES HAND
REVISED 06/10/2014
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
or °v .ER
W .mmnraw
PRELIMINARY
PLANS
eR xor uv
c°nmucnax
ILIZ CLEARING -LLT STA. 108 + 79.86
I x x
PROP UNG CATV WILL TIE INTO
Q� tia Q Ci y = EXISTING CATV CONDUITS ATTACHED END BRIDGE -
Q \ $ x x TO EXISTING BRIDGE
x /-/q a \ PROP. U/G CAN Y - y x
H x fl • £} Q 4 Qp* •go
*
Y
WNCREEK TWRTW _ P
np * W
TIE PROP. EXIST.�� Ifi/�Ij
. .,, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,,,_ * _ _ _ _ _ , x = W
\' IN SECTION
� I " *
"'°+*
h os oo _ "utsMIM A y * * +
* NRNA riou r x t y;' = x A_ 300'7RAN ITIO
I -*. _____ _ y O __-IWW1aTRz
EXlS3F,
T R. — rw
MT
—
I � ° '�N 88° 01` 13.8" E v
ti
Arar N b` 01 8.8 E
�'� _-. zasr ` c TARWn w s.uc caro•,s 4P• u,L
y
— = — SITE 6= 0,032 AC 5 300'LAhE TR"SITION — -�+ 2n
L i \ tws R Rf w T&RIR`a
42? 0 Q '� 3 r \ WATER ELEV-1.33" I P,a-afMl WPC - �LW` 2
4y 1 ,Cb ]9LYa pGLA 'VIiaR SITE 7= 0.003 AC Y. yR_ �P M1V /
ELEVWA t9p t_ I_ STD CMO n aAaj' C�*C!
d Q Q Q tR coc es. eeoremu sv. �,_fl Cl \ eAenJZPk'-o�XVR.l eRaurvo'
I + sod AS3ItANs'1TTON 107+47°T V°.!W r. ,,. - ..
im
_ z<azT R""P ° --- �R —+. "I I N 88° 1' 13 8" E Py REMD
_ p1+S0
m--- ----
rj
N 0 14
P �
u Y Y ' g + i * \ .000 1 _ _—+s un in ^ CVH*�H SL.fiLl'
I —
* n ' j iR TA.112+84.17 DCM-mm
I'.
` * _ : aEGIN NLbA,°R aeeR aOR ORSL.JtoRR RnILW"T I Eiil) BI�IDG w PRO.p{(p EMiM1NK PR•PCb®XANp�1°LE •- ,)t0.108+1].98
I z I]II]S'XOPla°R11 II ES r �{pPlfORll T- S .112+60.OtUt11' P
-IItT I aR°IN RNO' _ \ = y�
* _ W !Y emit Drawing
.cRT * Y * ; ,g: \*,�
r • * eet of_1�-Pls Sto 96+17.42 PISto !01+4911 PIS Stu 106+796596 = 0'45'00,9 L'I = S58'00.0'(LT) 9s = 945'00.0' +I =
Ls 20.00 xD = 0*45 00n Ls = 20O � I BEG APPROACHLT - 133.33' L= 928B9' J'A= 133.53' x N E STATE PORTS Au... • '.109+50.83 S A xorBs:
ST = 6687'T = 465A2' ST = 6687' ` oR zcR PC '_TI c "8 PROFILE SEE SHEETS 16 IUM 17.
R = 7.0.025 • \ x r ! 2.) FOR �LLT-
SE = 0425 \ BE BRIIiGC x 2J FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEETS 18 AND 19.
eW \ -LRT STA. 109 _ 75.00 3.) FOR -LLT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHEET Z�U
I �
4.) FOR -LRT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHERT 2-M.
I vs'

LLT-
PIS to 116+66D9
P/ Sto 124+1016
Pis Sto 131+0859
es = 4'30'0010'
A = 37'16'30.0(RT)es = 4'3D OOD'
Ls = 300D0'
D = 3'0900A'
Ls = 300.lXY
LT = 200,06'
L = 124250'
LT = 20ODF
ST = 100.06,
T = 644JY
ST = 10OD6'
R = /,909B6'
SE = OD7
-RPLLT-
Pls sto 116+80.05
PI SIG 122*03.59
PIS Sto 126+7390
Bs = rO5'33Z
L = 0YO0r125'(RT)es = r58'41D'
Ls = 30OD9
D - 243'42f
Ls = 145D0'
LT = 200D5'
L = 845.56
LT = 9667'
ST = 100.05'
T = 42859
ST = 4834'
R = 2JOOD9
SE = OD7
Y
Y x
8�
x
_
x
x Y
- S
ev_o %Cry O e etW $umt
x -l-"3-
x _
710,
_,
y
Y
x
Eta. 11
A.
J]4880=
LLT- S7 Sea 11}.8p'LZ)Y
REVISED 06/10/2014
F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
Y x Y DENOTES A'ND
Y Y CLEARING Y
NEW HANOVER SOLI 8 j4iER CONSERV 01STRI
Y OR 684 PC iK x
x �RI Y Y
[M I Y
Y k �38 Y PROP, U10 CAN Y Y
Y7 Y m Y 3 Y Y Y
x x x
p _ — * t
Y �l __- + ___ _ _'r`- _
L
�� ♦y^W
-
a
�.MW TnluemnY. —�
E 10= 0.0003 AC
NO.
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
x=r aae roe
.comvrmN
PRELIMIN
m NPr .
RY PLANS
awrrreaetmN
*
EAD cox 1'$UCTlBN '
EGIN*RESURPACI G
v LLT- C S7A,127,+J5.0p
-RPLLT- CS Sw 126+2536
Nac y •°Po:
•_�-= '1 ,� Ore l
_ r 'Pl
I ^N
hD CCNS `� -_ d �AV
tv
Ilk AWW.
m�
-RPLRT- CS Su 118+39J7
Y eao^s -LRT SC SK J18+37.97-RPIRT-SC Sea. 110-39.77RECEWW
YR& ,.� `Y 'i,.ti \i \\\\ \\ \ �...4y •0�S
m -TS` t3 raonutReer �. __ -
x -.1 fji2, HS,Y ;�\-
`=' 1 _LR Y PT Sta. R3+2&68 . Y gg+ +, ��\\\ \ JUN 3 0 2014
m 2Y Y -� 18.E Y Y -LRT- Y R `S x \� \ \\ P
• t- \ Y Pls Sto V *38D3 PI Sto 124+2&B9 PIS SIG 130+8053
3D OOQ' A =* 3-r 16' 30D'!RT es = r 3D OOD' \ \
x * Ls=Y300.00' 0 = 3'00'07D' LS = 300DO DCM-Mnmy
Y LT = 200D6L = 1J4250' LT = 2OW6' �NyNow \
M * cr _ ,M rx- T cRR°'Y Y 17- = 100.06'
Y
1 � Y END CONSTRUCTION t
daaaN B10 P\oNpi RPLRT- POC STA. 122+75.00
(n t HOPE MR I EM(2; 0r Hope WRI I * Utility Permit Drawing
P= 8'n6+8aJ6 32s8 P1s Stu 128+SL97 8 \ Sheet._L? Of1-
m 22 OOD'!l '30A'fRT)es = 5'5956.-r
S c=
` D = 2 4r 0u' S8.4• Ls = 200D0
`P L = 3/17T LT = 133.41'
T = 156J6' Y LT = 11292 7 = 392B9 Y SI" = 6674'
'HA
3fj ST = 87.45' x R = 965D0 NOTES: �\
SE = OD8 �� 1.1 FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 17.
x * �� — — 1) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 19, IAVFMCNT aEMDV,d
y J.) FOR APLRT- PROFILE SEE SHEETS 22 AND 23.
4.) FOR RPLLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 23.
I

.51e1w[NLl NO. I ww. NO.
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I _
REVISED 06/10/2014
INCOMPLE
E PLANS
m um os ev
emvmnwe
PAELIMIN
m e� as
RY PLANS
mwwtwwcnw
* r * * x L
* = 9
* * r
x y f * x
= y *�
: * * = r
f r s
* = x IO
_ * = x y r r •-RPLiT-PC Sta 138 s81. r r
r f r Vi} f
/ y r r r r r r = -RPL - PT SNi, 138+31.80
X
NEW HiWlVER SOIL 8 wnTER [ONSERV g5iR1 x x
"+e = 08 6M PG 716 r x
.'. r x x
= x _
* _ =wMunl _
/-RPLLT- SRS Sw. 127+7A36 -
/------^'—N r : f'tE�S- ,iM[De •Buq (y •p� _3
IM1 T FV41.1
�� PROP. U/0 CATV a = r x �.... 4�• �.
spy \\ *
G m. 129+1 8 w6ms *
- '
X \YS .5 Tab * = f f y Y�
M w�'
t� * * y =
y
xx\\ \\\ F \ u 1 = r y
-RPfLT-
� ='f= = f es Ls 5�5pB D _ 640r WiL7iJ1..I `.^-_...J * r = r
\ \ ,,66 e
LT 96.71' r L - ➢1623'l s
mhos = y 57 =k437' T - 51254 = _ = fS.
I = = f / y r = y
\ \ \ \ \\\ \ END TIP ' RO CT R-3601 * f "L
—LRT— POC STAE1.30�= _ °
- V ��\\VV �m�•� \� \� f f�\ * f f
s'\
Y
m \ \ `�,\ a`\ wF- / ".� -LLT- ST 3" 133+0L53 = _ _
UN=3 0 2014
-LRT- CS S 129+80.47 II * * + r y
= S A+�A� = f y y 1 f f /� •�tit��.+:
b \� \� \\�\,�\\ = r * •d = f * _ = x = f
�» \ \\ - - •a f y y _ Utility Perrpit DrAwing
\ +
eet�ot �-
L) FOR .Ll@7- PROFLLB SEE St71tE2 M.
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MV SNFf' NG.
-RI°LRT--RPlZT- jeavw.r oeswv Nrowuuts
ING:N@d Pl Sra 167+79.9/ Pt 57a 142+3/.77 MOINES
K ^/q5 0 = 3'03' 50.0 p = 3' 18'3lLTI .2'
K K L - 244.78' L = 689.42' 11,
" PO T = 122-57' T = 34998' "
" " K R = 1,870.00 R = Ib25,9a " K rt
K " K
REVISED 0611OY2014 k% "
[� c K "
4J
K 1J rt
8+-RPLLT- POT Sra 148+1i.93
�.`1 K I • h .mot. • -}9-POT Sta. IB•:OO.DO ` K �a`y
\ 4•
K K K � 1 " h ��R " � � ti'•if•t.^
K xRws /-RPLLT- PT Std 14S+71.22 , xS/
-4 ` xUA ik k
` k K � \ /� BEGIN CONSTRUCTION k
_—Y3—'OT STA.10+23.60 k k
END RESURFACING " t`
w - POT ST'A.150_ 00.00 _
_ --- 5j45—` `. " k " k V K xoo^s" _ s N
OF —
_ c
IE
\� ♦ dlCi M Np C seer=��— ,0Q _
R
/ ` us v s uS r. > us +ns .c �n s v.•a:ac Rsr
1 .x,1Jp5 / �// -r � Mi.-r r � • _ u'p,..,r ��•� /%// �i
K u� •`\ �% / // i ie ' .. , � m Li ".. k k KxOP]5 J� /�/// /
SR MAIL
1 -- - - -. _ _ - _.. k•� __ - '/xas ii'� _.8 ..�'^'" _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ � gjiT7+fL_t0 Rhin/ �m j./�6•.�.��� £c ._ -. __
K µ, / /, JS// O/ 4+� .i isLisv , J51• Ee / i l i — 5a� k, -
1 KCWS CJ'GIiCB — '•S. u' _G F JSRx //R �i' i� •Vk 't��•v�
K \y `i/ 1NR ix� I /NCDO� 60y2 ♦ " ¢
+�-RPLtFT-• PT I. log 2
K •� / / / v/ `N71 APSR + /� .xx• 'a$ i� 1 k.
97 a
TRAFFIC DIAGRAM
a US 17-74-42L' "'"_ /� / / ' _ -• K e v
i " 1, �I R �` K ��Uyytility Permit Drawing
0 2 2! TiC 133 26,321 i ��/ r "e'�°s< Ap, " .. .. K K " e' 1 I II o ; xoW t spRin CPp0AtlP.et-..LLOt I-
n 39,600 39'600 x, us+;/�/niEO K
w'
z S60 00
aaa sag k 1 END CONSTRU ON
woou ; lI m
g t 2035 ADT gLCT20 } 0 p0 K Y3 1 G Sro 73�3118 " �� " RPLRT— PqT STA.166+50.00 JUN 8 0 2 1,
I m � GOK Tr SrR• 160 �n /
c SR 1352\\ - _. B
(BATTLESHIP RD.) , _ i 1 % eq t .� P,1 Stu 14+6850 - PI Stu 20+58.44 �!-
K " COhS�'RGCTION
n22lESH'R@4 A = 48'39'00.0'(RT) p = 74'05'15.7(LT)
= xorB: \ K BOMMopG f a % mj. / ; kY3— STA. 13+58.00 0 = 15 583 D = 3 00.0'
y 1.) AO PROFILE PROVIDED FOR LEFT nXIV °e c " " , � / " - 2,6Y
L42VE tf7DEY OFF TIM EXISTLYG. \. \ \ \ K " " ice' a' ! ii/ <r. " ♦ R = 30/.56' R = 301.56'
2.) FOR RPZRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 23.
I
Im COMPlE
E PLANS
Nor vxx van
.muwtm
PRELIMINARY
W Mm VY
PLANS
cwfRULTIm

I .
j A ° Q MACT MENRI CF No. SHEET NC.
afrt No.
ROADWAY 01s . HroA M=
FNOINM FNONVIR
\� % T
URBAN SMART LROw H BELVILLE. LLC
/ W 2a51 PG a «L \
/ It OR 2BSIPL f .F
OOR 3lil PG �DB ++
9
Y--POT sa 36+/ ,
fig'" l X -YAWL y $fa 36++,,�� 8J (20.7S'LT.)
-YSBL 1'O Ssw. 36+d7. (2R7J'R7)\ \ } O
DO T7�PL 1.9WNING roe 96T Pc ae POWER LINE \
ROTAT& EXISTING NANNHOLE TOP USE PAY NC.0 \a�I+-W
ITEM ROTATE EXISTING MANHOLE TOP" OR 25 r \` PaoPwFO we \
"ROTATE EXISTING MANHOLE TOP WITH ) esO ctlr_ s�m°ta f o s.ri�ps mFrHant unu yY '\\ +�
1 NEW(ECCENIFIC TOP)' T
1
1 1 ;� 130.0. aw END CONSTRUCTION
RfNvx 130.00' y + { -Y- PRC 3 73.92 '+, it °`
_ Exlsr.awx F . \ .i —Y— STA. 41+9�.2.3
ecs`r. i ronY� •� �__ { POT -
�r�r. E.ISIYG +
1 F9tRH90 M lV i OSCt LlL�'{ —. •9} ' _ i
9 -Y- POT SF{a 42+79.72 s {
NORTH CAROLINA STATE Hwy COWw Y
��— Y 'Y N9 REFS.
21 �. L -.Y8_{ { { T.x .c. 3.ox-Y. P7 Ss¢N1+03.
(30.7J'LT.) ----- -- ----- _ ' { - +
.V , CCC ° .cwirs'u+ yT 1 Gila �ITRANSMON 6'88RM pp5 ry -BL-S -- _ _ _ _ _ _-
1 h °' ei. - s—TQ}'SROL71]BRkxaTfw nn ` NCOOT PS MON.p...
I + ro 10'R ,�,. aE 1 a u yv s+°= s+vc a•Pvc n�
i
' •,) 81° 17 07 " E C IA S � •v ---
.__. ° ry _
—_--_--
I— — _ _ _ _ _ _ . •• —�
� + ---- ----"—
Arm
— REPAIR FILL WE AS
ER
W wleN• sn C P vl 1 /—�""'L' — 0 DIRECTED Bt GINEER
�''y7•' MWT-
R•+5 TRAA'S.
REMI u• RCP mcos ^ .< L & RT
=J 0=50=225'� [ + 9, H EX
� i , ti � � _ ue or o
SANDEEP AP R, El. IIY E, V f M°•' ZZJMP SFf Ofl H 96.00' - �� URBPH SMART GROwrH{BELVI&E. LL[ � •a°= n s
OB 2B30 PG %./ / p0 28 PL 90
OR 36T PC PROP. Sn 15.63 -Y2- D,�O 4 _ '..\ Y �' re zn�Pc
MO _7 PG 5 ^ / 7 —3= St.. 3 87 { { + FLAMINGO PROPERTIES, LLC
WATER LINE _ 0 fi ,� BELVILLE - 7 S 4. .OP { y y OR use K aM
14 . 4 P ORE TIES. LLC % i I y OB 27T PG 152
T .NCS — "l , _ yc^s { i ,w.'c� \y. ♦ ..
Al CIT
- FH - K
g
xn. 5 q {o'+
I '' 86 14 '8, f Foxe sh _ { { z��
E �E� / Ro" TRAFFIC DIAGRAM
vu,I +a � + + PI STu 37+5936 PI SIC 39+8351
4 / art DITCH ii`"' E 51. { yam, / p = 2' 1Y 17.Y (LT) p = Z I1' I7.� (RT I
y 19,829
Aa ORAL A � �¢ yam/ D = FT 57' 177' D = 0' 57' IT7• NC ]33/RIVER RD.
li �� AQ1y� O C - 229Ja L - 229N' 33,400 30,100
P { 85. / \\• SE=-tiN001:0' NC 5E 6NC 700 / 1500
4 'IT pp( • °6w* 5,700 2,300
r + C W +FS GFQlSiIL! ]] i . \p _]rJ_
(A IPA
i _ I Pi SIG 15+3238 P/ Sto 03972 5,4SO 10J3 AD7
o C=1 8+ I�{ / D = 10"563J52_' ?-7' (RT! � 59' S2 079' sLTI 8,200 1035 ADT
Ej /4 L = 10 25' OZ7' D I ' 8- 43.9
H c p L s•/ / n d F UCHMDB 3 E PC PROPERTIES. LLC. S \ SR I55J
'P CLV! P RP W
/{ + 25 R = 550D0' T = 215.93' (MACRWRLL RD.)
I 5 \ Mr.e row > A :- n
� � 9
m w�l IA `.�st. t. sr. , 'ts
a fi{ - - \\ Utility Permit Drawing
THOMAS HALL MOTE:
+2 Oe :evPc es \ Sheet�_oflj_
L) FOR -Y- PROFILE SEE SSEET 24.
+J OB 9A of 9p
Z) FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SRBET 25.
-Y2- PT Sw.
Im wOMPLE
w .An
E PLANS
.rnvRrrm
PRELIMIN
RY PLANS
w norm
cawerwRrnm

a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY 1. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 21, 2014
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
US Army Corp. of Engineers Division of Coastal Management
69 Darlington Avenue 400 Commerce Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 Morehead City, NC 28557
ATTN: Brad Shaver
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sirs':
ATTN: Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Modification Request for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23, Section 10
Permit, CAMA Major Development Permit, and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC 133 from
the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange,
Brunswick County. Federal Aid Project No. NHS-0017(68); TIP No. R-3601.
Debit $240.00 from WBS Element 38868.1.1
References: R-3601 404/401/CAMA permit application dated April 26, 2013
R-3601 Nationwide Permit 23 and 5, issued August 19, 2013 (SAW-2007-
03461-010)
R-3601 Major CAMA permit, issued August 2, 2013 (#89-13)
R-3601 401 Water Quality Certification, issued May 16, 2013 (DWR# 13-
0472)
The purpose of this letter is to request modification of the issued permits on this project to
account for design changes and approved moratorium in -water work methods. Please find
enclosed revised permit drawings, sturgeon concurrence letter from the National Marine
Fisheries Service, and agency correspondence regarding construction methods for the above
referenced project. Please replace permit drawings from the original submittal with the full
set included with this modification request.
As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
widen US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133
Interchange by adding one auxiliary lane in each direction. This project involves the
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-707-NU. 1ECEMD LOCATION
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX [phone]W CENTURY CENTER BUILDING B
PROTECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WESSITE. WWW.NCDO RG 1020 BIRCH RODE DR.
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 27610
RALEIGH NC 27699-15Q M�1V
D^A _Ilfi T `!`

replacement of two bridges over the Brunswick River with one bridge carrying both travel
directions. Additionally, the northbound bridge over Alligator Creek will be replaced and the
southbound structure will be widened. To further alleviate congestion problems, a second
auxiliary lane in the northbound direction will be added. _
There will be 0.41 acre of permanent impacts to riparian wetlands resulting from fill,
excavation, and mechanized clearing resulting from project construction, of which 0.03 acre
are impacts to CAMA wetlands. This is a decrease from the previous permit which allowed
for 0.44 acre of permanent impacts to wetlands of which 0.04 were impacts to CAMA
wetlands. A total of 105 linear feet of permanent stream impacts are also anticipated; this is a
decrease from the 185 linear feet that were previously permitted. A revised EEP acceptance
letter showing the decrease in impacts will be forwarded to you upon receipt.
The permanent impact area due to bridge bents will be 0.03 acre which is a 0.01 acre increase
from the previous permit. The design bridges will have fewer columns than previously
permitted however the diameter is greater. This change was necessary in order to construct the
structures and comply with the in -water work moratorium. Temporary work bridges will also
be necessary to construct and improve bridges on this project. The existing clearances will be
maintained on both the Alligator and Brunswick Rivers.
A primary nursery area in -water work moratorium will be observed from January 1 to June 30
for Alligator Creek and from January 1 to September 30 for the Brunswick River. Limited in -
water construction methods to be used during the in -water moratorium include working inside
of casings, static pile extraction, spudding associated with barges, removal of piles using a
vibratory hammer, and installation of casings using the screwing in method (see attached
memo and correspondence).
Regulatory Approvals
CAMA: NCDOT requests that the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major
Development permit (#89-13) issued on August 2, 2013 be modified to account for a decrease
in impacts and change in approved in -water work methods during the moratorium as noted
above.
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be re -issued under the existing Nationwide Permit 23
(refer to NWP 23 issued on August 19, 2013 SAW-2007-03641-010).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3891 will apply to this
project as it was previously permitted (refer to 401 Water Quality Certification issued on May
16, 2013 DWQ#: 13-0472). All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will
continue to be met. NCDOT is providing this application to the NCDWR for their review and
approval.
WENED
MAY 2 7 2014
DCM-MM CIW

A copy of this permit modification request will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
httt)s:Hconnect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.asox under Quick Links >
Permit Applications
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Amy James at [e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely,
Richard Hlncock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 2014
'3
DCM-M iD CnY

4 Stantec Memo
To: Amy James From: Melissa Ruiz
NCDOT, Natural Environment Section 801 Jones Franklin Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27606
File: Date: March 7, 2014
Reference: NCDOT R-36oi Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge Replacements and
Widening Construction Methods
This memo is to follow-up on the construction methods discussion that took place during the Environmental
Pre -construction meeting on March 3, 2014. Constructability of the project has been an issue especially
considering the in -water work moratorium in place on Alligator Creek (1/1 - 6/3o) and the Brunswick River
(1/1- 9/30). In an effort to improve constructability, and protect the environment around these project sites,
our team is requesting permission to use certain construction methods for in -water work that are currently
prohibited during in -water work moratorium periods. The use of some of these methods during moratoriums
have already been approved and included in permits (Item 2 on permit #89-13 from DENR/CRC) or the
Environmental Scope of Work from NCDOT (Items 1-3) while others were discussed during our meeting on
March 3. So that we may facilitate the permit application approval process in April/May 2014, we are
presenting a comprehensive list of the construction methods in order of importance that our team would like
to utilize for in -water work during the moratorium periods:
i. Working inside of casings year round — Use of this method is considered an exception from the
moratorium according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT.
2. Static pile extraction — Use of this method was considered an exception from the moratorium
according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT. This method of extraction is useful for some
activities such as spudding. However, due to the characteristics of the substrate and sediment located
in the waterways, using this method to remove existing piles and temporary work bridges will likely
lead to pile fractures as they are pulled.
3. Spudding associated with barges — Use of this method was considered an exception from the
moratorium according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT.
4. Removal of piles using vibratory hammer — According to the NMFS concurrence letter (received by
NCDOT 11/6/2013 and provided as an attachment to this memo) in the Project Effects section, the
extraction of existing piles by vibratory hammer shall be considered an exception to the in -water
moratorium.
5. Installation of casings using the screwing in method — Specific information regarding this method was
provided to regulatory agencies. In response to the information, NMFS indicated "route of potential
adverse effects from the design modification (i.e., the angering) proposed to be implemented during
the in -water moratorium period" (communication with Eric Hawk, NMFS, 2/19/2014 and provided as
an attachment to this memo).
6. Installation of piles using vibratory hammer — According to the NMFS concurrence letter (received by
NCDOT 11/6/2013 and provided as an attachment to this memo), "vibratory driving of piles or bridge
DaYpn wM comrruiy In mind
MAY 2 7 2014
DC.V-h`.HDCrIy

® Stantec
March 7, 2014
Amy James
Page 2 of 2
Reference: NCDOT R-3601 Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge Replacements and Widening
Construction Methods
support structures, or removal of old bridge structures, generates a continuous but low-level noise
and is unlikely to cause more than noninjurious, insignificant behavioral effects to sturgeon."
7. Installation of casings using vibratory hammer — This method is very similar to Item 6 with the
exception that it will take slightly more time as the casings for the bridges must penetrate into the
PeeDee substrate while piles for temporary work bridges may not be installed to the same depth.
One of the principal objectives of the bridge designs adopted by our Team for this project has been to
minimize the amount of all in -water work Results of our efforts have led to a reduction in the total number of
pier columns that will be in the water. Project R-36oi was permitted under the Department's design with 45
columns in water at Brunswick River and 28 columns in water at Alligator Creek Under our design, we
propose to place 26 columns at Brunswick River and 18 columns at Alligator Creek within the banks of these
waterways, yielding a total net reduction of 29 columns that will be constructed in the water.
Our Team would also like to share that the actual time of casing and pile construction in the water will
represent a fraction of the time that the contractor's forces will be at work on placement of these bridge
foundation elements. While this is an approximate percentage, we estimate 25% of the total time the
contractor is installing casings and piles will actually involve vibrating or screwing these structures into place.
The majority of the time required to perform this work will be devoted to moving equipment, splicing casings
and pile segments, and setting up for each installation.
As a final benefit to the environment, the ability to use some or all of these construction methods during
moratorium periods should serve to decrease the length of time that the temporary bridges will remain in
place during the course of the project.
With low levels of noise and vibration, minimal disturbance of bed materials, and no pile driving or casing
installations with impact hammers at any time while in the water, our Team believes that the flexibility
offered through the use of these construction methods described in this memorandum will enable
construction work for bridge foundations in the least amount of time. We appreciate having this opportunity
to describe our proposed construction procedures in greater detail. If you or any one of the individual agencies
would like to bring specific questions to us, please do not hesitate to contact me.
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Senior Environmental Scientist
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]o24
[e-mail]
Attachment: NMFS Concurrence Letter
DeMan With com,■dry in mind
MAY 2 7 2014
DC'vl-NPjDC:TY

Ruiz, Melissa
From: Baker, Jessi E <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:06 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.; lames, Amy E; [e-mail]; Herndon, Mason; Lane,
Stephen
Cc: Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal ([e-mail]); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
I concur with WRC that I do not support installation using vibratory hammer during the moratorium
Jessi Baker, Fisheries Resource Specialist
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone] ext. 213
iessi.baker(@ ,ncdenr.gov
Please visit www.nccoastalmananement.net to subscribe to
Coastal Management's quarterly newsletter, the CAMAgram.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 3:47 PM
To: James, Amy E; [e-mail]; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal ([e-mail]); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
WRC does not support pile or casing installation by vibratory hammer during the moratorium. WRC was not supportive
of allowing vibratory extraction, but we were amenable due to concerns raised regarding the safety and ability to static
pull. Being sympathetic to the need for some relief on the time restrictions we felt like that was a reasonable
compromise. Also, we have agreed to allow casings to be installed during the moratorium by screwing them in, under
an assumption that the effects will be minimal because they should be similar to what occurs inside the
casing. Although this is not an unreasonable assumption, it does constitute in water work of which the affects on fish
migration have not been studied. This was the second concession to the in water work moratorium. Allowing the
additional in water work would further undermine the remaining conservation measures in place to protect fish
migration through this area. Without reasonable justification I cannot agree to the use of vibratory installation during
the in water work moratorium.
NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program RECEIVED
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522 MAY 2 7 2014
DC:>S•VHD CITY

Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
Travis. WilsoniD ncwildlife.org
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver(a)usace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawkenoaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
Hi all,
I'm forwarding the memo from our design -build contractor that I sent out about two weeks ago discussing proposed in -
water work allowed during the moratorium since I've only heard from Travis since then. I really need your input before
the contractor commits to certain construction methods/timelines—the main takeaways from this memo are thus:
• The first four proposed exceptions to work in -water during the moratorium were informally agreed upon during
the design -build bid/concurrence process (work inside casings, static and vibratory pile extraction, and
spudding);
• The fifth proposal (casing 'screw -in') has been discussed recently and was approved by some (but not all)
parties, pending other issues (acoustic monitoring);
• The sixth proposal (pile installation by vibratory hammer) has not really been discussed before now (and hence,
is not approved) and is mainly an issue for installing piles for temporary workbridges;
• The seventh proposal (casing installation by vibratory hammer) has also not been proposed before now, though
I'm not sure whether the casings will have been 'screwed in' beforehand.
I know the last two proposals are for activities that generally do not receive moratorium exceptions, but I am doing due
diligence and forwarding the requests to you for review. If I can go back to the contractor with some concrete feedback,
I think it will help them in formulating their permit application/modification that is slated to be submitted towards the
end of April.
Please'reply all' since I will be out of the office all of next week. Thank you for your help and patience during this
process.
Amy
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM
To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver(alusace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (erlc.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
I do not recall WRC agreeing to pile installation during the moratorium by use of vibratory hammer.
NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone]
tf RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 2014
z
DCSf-h:ifO CITY

Fax:[phone]
Travis. W ilson@ ncwildlife.or¢
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM
To: brrad.e.shaver(cbusace.armv.mil; Hemdon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley,
Karen M
Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
Hi All,
Attached to this email is a memo from our contractor, Stantec, that outlines in -water construction methods it would like
to use during the sturgeon and/or PNA moratoriums. One of these is already explicitly stated in the LAMA permit (static
pull), some have only been informally approved by resource agencies (spudding, vibratory pull, etc.) and at least two (#6
and #7) have been discussed in theory and are only proposals by the contractor at this point. This memo is an effort to
reduce any 'surprises' in the permit modification process, so your comments and feedback are needed. Please let me
know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer them.
Thanks,
Amy
Amy James
Biologist, Project Management
NCDOT, Natural Environment Section
Direct 919.707-6129
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
. RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 2014
DCVb!:iDC.r y

Ruiz, Melissa
From: Lane, Stephen <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:48 PM
To: James, Amy E, Wilson, Travis W.; [e-mail]; Herndon, Mason
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal ([e-mail]); Rivenbark, Chris;
Mccauley, Karen M; Sollod, Steve
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
Hi Amy,
Thanks for sending your email summarizing the contractor's proposal. The DCM has reviewed the draft proposal, and
after consultation with our fisheries resource agencies and much internal discussion, we have concluded that we could
agree to the first five proposed exceptions to the moratoria if officially requested in a permit modification request. DCM
has also concluded that the six and seventh proposed exceptions do not appear to be appropriate for this project and
would likely not receive permit approval. I hope you find this guidance helpful in formulating your anticipated permit
modification request. If I may be of any further assistance, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver(ulusace.armv.mil• Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk0noaa.aovl; Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
Hi all,
I'm forwarding the memo from our design -build contractor that I sent out about two weeks ago discussing proposed in -
water work allowed during the moratorium since I've only heard from Travis since then. I really need your input before
the contractor commits to certain construction methods/timelines—the main takeaways from this memo are thus:
• The first four proposed exceptions to work in -water during the moratorium were informally agreed upon during
the design -build bid/concurrence process (work inside casings, static and vibratory pile extraction, and
spudding);
• The fifth proposal (casing 'screw -in') has been discussed recently and was approved by some (but not all)
parties, pending other issues (acoustic monitoring);
• The sixth proposal (pile installation by vibratory hammer) has not really been discussed before now (and hence,
is not approved) and is mainly an issue for installing piles for temporary workbridges;
• The seventh proposal (casing installation by vibratory hammer) has also not been proposed before now, though
I'm not sure whether the casings will have been 'screwed in' beforehand.
I know the last two proposals are for activities that generally do not receive moratorium exceptions, but I am doing due
diligence and forwarding the requests to you for review. If I can go back to the contractor with some concrete feedback,
I think it will help them in formulating their permit application/modification that is slated to be submitted towards the
end of April.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 2014
DUNEDWY

Please 'reply all' since I will be out of the office all of next week. Thank you for your help and patience during this
process.
Amy
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM
To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver(a)usace.armv.mil: Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M
Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
I do not recall WRC agreeing to pile installation during the moratorium by use of vibratory hammer.
NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
Travis.Wilsonifi ncwildlife.org
From: James, Amy E
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM
To: brad.e.shaver(cbusace.armv.mil: Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk0noaa.ci ); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley,
Karen M
Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium
Hi All,
Attached to this email is a memo from our contractor, Stantec, that outlines in -water construction methods it would like
to use during the sturgeon and/or PNA moratoriums. One of these is already explicitly stated in the CAMA permit (static
pull), some have only been informally approved by resource agencies (spudding, vibratory pull, etc.) and at least two (#6
and #7) have been discussed in theory and are only proposals by the contractor at this point. This memo is an effort to
reduce any'surprises' in the permit modification process, so your comments and feedback are needed. Please let -me
know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer them.
Thanks,
Amy
Amy Ja mes
Biologist, Project Management
NCDOT, Natural Environment Section
Direct 919.707-6129
aeiamesOncdot.gov
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. RECEWW
2
MAY 2 7 2014
DUNMerry

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
a National Oceanic and Atmosphenc Administration
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
v Swftasl Regmal (rfk
263 13Ih Averue South
St Petewvq Flonda 33701 5505
h"D 'se•o nT's roa gov
NOV 0 6 2013 F/SER3: EGH
SER-2013-10713
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe. Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Ref.: Federal Aid Project NHS-0017(68) — Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge
Replacements and Widening, U.S. Highway 17-74-76, Leland -Wilmington Area,
Brunswick County, North Carolina
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
This responds to your letter dated February 25, 2013, submitted to National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). You requested
concurrence from NMFS with NCDOT's findings that the proposed project may affect but is not
likely to adversely affect the federally -listed shor[nose and Atlantic sturgeons. We requested
additional information by e-mail on March 28, April 12, 17, 18, 29, and 30, 2013. Responses
were received on March 28, April 12, 18, and 30, 2013. A conference call with the interested
parties was held on May 23, 2013. NMFS requested additional information on June 5, 2013, and
a response was received on July 10, 2013, at which time informal consultation was initiated. Our
findings regarding the effects of the proposed action are based on the description of the action in
the present informal consultation. Any changes to the proposed action may negate the findings
of this consultation and may require reinitiating of consultation with NMFS. This consultation is
being conducted with NCDOT as the nonfederal representative designated by the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), North Carolina Division (letter dated April 8, 2003), pursuant
to 50 CFR 402.08.
Project Location
The midpoint positions of the two bridges to be replaced or widened between the neighboring
cities of Leland and Wilmington are as follows: 34.234086°N, 77.985969°W, U.S. Highway 17-
74-76 bridge crossing over the Brunswick River (a tributary of the Cape Fear River);
34.234272°N, 77.979400°W, bridge crossing over Alligator Creek (a small creek off the
Brunswick River) (North American Datum 1983). These bridges are approximately 30 miles
upriver from the opening to the Atlantic Ocean (Figures 1-3). The U.S. Highway 17-74-76 (US
17-74-76) bridges over the Brunswick River are located at river kilometer 46.4.
Figure 1 shows the project location in relation to the Cape Fear River and its distance from the
Atlantic Ocean. Figure 2 shows the east -west highway (US 17-74-76) leading through the
RECEIVED
s'
MAY 2 7 2014
• 4
DCM-MHD CITY

project area, surrounding rivers, and urban development to the east and west of the project site.
Figure 3 is a close-up view of the project site.
Brunswick River is a tributary of the Cape Fear River.
Proposed Action
NCDOT proposes to replace the two -span bridge over the Brunswick River with a single -span
structure carrying both travel directions, and the northbound bridge over Alligator Creek will
also be replaced. The southbound bridge over Alligator Creek will be widened. Three
temporary work bridges will be required to remove the existing bridge over the Brunswick River,
although only one will be in place at any time. One temporary work bridge will be needed to
widen the bridge over Alligator Creek. For both bridge projects, the temporary work bridges
will be built using piles driven by impact hammer. The dual bridges on US 17-74-76 over
Brunswick River consist of 13 spans of 60 ft with a concrete monolithic deck and a substructure
of reinforced caps on piles. The new structure will carry both travel directions and consists of
eight spans of 100-ft length with a 4.5-ft pre -stressed girder superstructure and a substructure of
end bents on piles and reinforced caps on 4-ft drilled shafts. The final structure will be supported
by seven bents consisting of seven 4-ft shafts per bent. The bridge on US 17-74-76 over
Alligator Creek will consist of five spans of 50 ft with a concrete monolithic deck and a
substructure of reinforced caps on piles. The new structure will consist of three 40-ft, one 45-ft,
and three 40-ft with a 36-in pre -stressed girder superstructure and a substructure of integral end
bents on piles and reinforced caps on 4-ft drilled shafts. The final structure will consist of six
bents of six 4-ft shafts per bent. Work will be done from barges and work bridges, not
causeways that would block off parts of the channel, so the river/creek area left available for
rk RECEIVED
z " MAY 2 7 2014
DCM_MAD CITY

sturgeon passage during construction should not differ much from normal (A. James, NCDOT,
pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, April 18, 2013). The riverine/wetland impacts for the
Brunswick River structure will be 0.02 ac for all permanent bents, and 0.1 ac for all temporary
bents. For the Alligator Creek work, there will be 0.01 ac of impacts for all permanent bents,
and 0.02 ac for all temporary bents. In=water construction activities will include spudding (i.e.,
anchoring barges hydraulically), removing existing piles using a vibratory hammer and/or
statically (i.e., without the use of a vibratory hammer), drilling new piers using a vibratory
hammer, and augering out material from hollow, driven piles. Any material removed during the
augering-out process will be contained and not allowed to enter the surrounding environment.
No explosives will be used. Cofferdams will not be built. Some existing pilings may be
manually cut in place by divers using a diamond -cable cutting device. Bridge construction will
take approximately three years. NCDOT has estimated that the duration of the vibratory
driving/removing of piles will be approximately 32-48 hours per phase, spread over three phases,
where one phase equates to roughly one year of work (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E.
Hawk, May 30, 2013).
US 17-74-76 highway between Leland and Wilmington. The western bridge
("Brunswick River bridge") crosses the Brunswick River just north of where it widens;
the eastern bridge ("Alligator Creek bridge") crosses Alligator Creek, a small tributary of
the Brunswick River, just west of where US 17-74-76 splits to the north and southeast.
To protect potentially spawning Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon and other anadromous species
that may be moving upriver or downriver past the site during construction. NCDOT will adhere, R6CE VED
to an in -water -work moratorium from January 1 through May 31 in the Brunswick River and
MAY 2 7 2014
DC,1-b!1iDCrrV

Alligator Creek sites, as well as wetlands with an active connection to these two water bodies (A.
James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, July 10, 2013). NCDOT initially proposed an
in -water moratorium commencing February 15, but after consultation with NMFS, moved back
the moratorium startup date to accommodate NMFS's concerns over potential spawning sturgeon
presence at the site in February and late January. NCDOT may extend the moratorium beyond
May 31, if requested by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Division (NCWRC) and the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) to protect primary nursery areas and
downstream migration of alosinel juveniles.
If it becomes necessary during construction due to unexpected setbacks or delays, NCDOT will
negotiate with NCWRC and NCDMF for possible exceptions to conduct unexpected, necessary
work during the moratorium, such as removal of existing piles and installation of casings. In
past NCDOT bridge construction projects over anadromous rivers and streams, NCDOT has
negotiated on a project by project basis with NCWRC and NCDMF to complete certain types of
in -water work during these moratoriums. In past North Carolina bridge construction projects
with in -water moratoria, limited exceptions have been granted to the in -water -work moratorium,
to allow extracting existing piles by vibratory hammer, drilling within pre -installed casings (i.e.,
casings installed outside the in -water work moratorium), spudding of work barges, and
excavating causeway to natural ground (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS,
April 18, 2013). As per an agreement with NMFS, in -water work may occur during the month of
January under the exception discussed above only if bubble curtains are used (to dampen
underwater noise transmission), pending reinitiation of ESA consultation and approval by NMFS
of the proposed in -water work method (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS,
September 4, 2013). However, NCDOT may install and use bubble curtains at any time during
construction, i.e., year-round, without need for additional consultation or approval from NMFS
(E. Hawk, pers. comm. to A. James, October 31, 2013).
According to NCDOT, the original design of the project called for a temporary detour bridge to
be built, and a two -span, dual bridge design (as currently exists over Alligator Creek) over the
Brunswick River. The temporary detour bridge alternative was eliminated, however, to
accommodate moratorium constructability concerns, and a single -span (two travel lanes in
opposite directions) bridge design was adopted. These measures will effectively reduce the
construction schedule by one season, and by extension, reduce potential disruption to sturgeon
habitat. Use of NCDOT's best management practices for the protection of surface waters will
also help minimize project effects. Floating turbidity curtains may be used around the work site
if determined practicable.
r Afow species: shad. herring, and alewife.
NCDOT implemented a sediment and erosion control program for construction aaivities in 1970. This program requires
preparing erosion control plans. implemening and maintaining standard specifications and project -special provisions. and
monitoring active work sites for compliance with North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Law. Through the Post -
Construction Runoff Control Program. NCDOT is implementing the Best Management Plan "toolbox" and the BMP Inspection
and Maintenance programs to protect water quality and minimize post -construction impacts. The Highway Stormwater Program.
established in 1998, is an NCDOT-wide initiative to protect and improve water quality while fulfilling NCDOTs missionof
providing and supporting a safe and integrated transponation system that enhances the state. InD
4 1MAY 2 7 1014
DCM-MHD crry

Brunswick River and its Alligator Creek tributary.
Species Affected and Life History Requirements
The only federally -listed species under NMFS's jurisdiction that may occur in the project area
are shormose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, and the South Atlantic distinct population
segment (DPS) of Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus.; Sea turtles are not
expected at the project site because of its distance from the open ocean (approximately 30 river
miles). Although the river is tidally influenced at the project site, there have not been any
documented (by NCDMF for NMFS) sea turtle sightings that far upriver (F. Rohde, NMFS, pens.
comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, March 28, 2013). Therefore, we believe the project will have no
effect on sea turtles. There is no NMFS-designated critical habitat in the project area.
Shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon inhabit large rivers and coastal and marine habitats along the
Atlantic coast and are likely present at the project site during certain times of the year. Young
sturgeon primarily inhabit freshwater regions of rivers and eat a wide variety of plant and animal
materials. As they get older, their tolerance to salinity increases. Juveniles rear in their natal
river and estuary for several years before moving progressively seaward.
The Brunswick River and Alligator Creek are tributaries of the Cape Fear River and shortnose
sturgeon are known to inhabit the Cape Fear River and its tributary, the Northeast Cape Fear
River. Spring (upstream) spawning migrations are believed to be triggered when water
temperatures warm above 80C; from the late winter/early spring (southern rivers) to mid -to -late
3 Acfpenser is Latin for sturgeon, brevirosirum means "short beak" and oxyrinchw means -sharp nose." t RBCEMI)
MAY 2 7 2014
DCM-MHDC1TY

spring (northern rivers), specifically occurring in the Cape Fear River between January—March.4
Although there are few data describing the distribution and population of shortnose sturgeon
within the Cape Fear River, researchers concur that a self -recruiting population of shortnose
inhabits the river.5.6
Atlantic sturgeon are known to occur in the Brunswick River, as detailed below. As adults, they
migrate seasonally between freshwater and mesohaline7 areas within the river, based on water
temperature and salinity cues, and up the major Atlantic coast rivers to spawn. Juvenile and
adult Atlantic sturgeon reside in upper estuarine habitat where they frequently congregate around
the saltwater -freshwater interface. In general, residency time of young Atlantic sturgeon in
estuarine areas varies from 1-6 years, before emigrating along the coast and onto the continental
shelf where they grow to maturity.$
Seasonality of Sturgeon Presence in the Action Area
Moser et al. [p. 33, Figures 14 and 15; p. 36; p. 401 documented shortnose sturgeon presence at
or near the Brunswick River project area in February -March and May -June, and documented the
capture of two gravid shonnose sturgeon females at or within 10 kilometers of the project area
(one in early January 1990, the other in early February 1991). The study showed greatest
shortnose sturgeon gross travel rates occur during January -March, presumably participating in
spawning migrations. Moser et a]. also captured 100 Atlantic sturgeon, with Brunswick River
having the highest CPUE of three areas sampled by gillnet (the other two areas were Wilmington
Harbor and the upper Cape Fear River); CPUE's were highest during summer and early fall
(June -September). These fish were generally captured over shoals (less than 7 m), even though
the nets extended into deeper channel areas.
Overall, however, shonnose and Atlantic sturgeon presence is thought to be rare in the
Brunswick River and project area, with shonnose being considerably rarer than Atlantics.
Recently, local North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) biologists permitted by NMFS conducted gillnet sampling
in the Brunswick River and put acoustic transmitters on Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon captured
there. In spite of intensive netting effort in 2012, only two shortnose sturgeon were captured
from January to June 2012, a total of 26 Atlantic sturgeon and two shortnose sturgeon were
captured during 27 targeted gillnet sets ranging from 1-4 hours per set. The largest Atlantic
sturgeon (1.75 m) captured and tagged was in pre -spawning condition, a running -ripe male on
February 22. The largest shonnose sturgeon captured/tagged (0.87 m) was a ripe female with
mature oocytes visible at the incision site, on January 6. From mid -September to December
a Moss. M.L and S.W. Ross. 1993. Distnbwnm and mosrmrnLs of shrcittosr sttogeon (Arif+rnsrr hntiroalmml and other anadromou hsha
of the lower Cape Fear River. North Camhna. Final Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington. Nsnh Carolina.
s Ross. S.W.. F.C. Roh& and D.G. Lindquist. 1988. Fidmgcmd, threatened, and our fausaof North Carolina. Pan 11..4 re-evalmtiro of thr
trance and estuarine fishes. Oc ,s l Paper t4 the Ntrdt Carolina Btoh)gical Sunny 1988. 20 pp.
' Moser. M.L and S.W. Ross. 1995. Habitat use and movemems of shortnose and Atlantic sturgeons in the lower Cape Feu River. North
Carolina. Transxtirrs of the Amtrncan Fishtres Society. 124: 225-234.
' Referring to estuarine water with salinity ranging 5- I8 pans per thousand (i.e.. moderately -brackish" water).
'Smith, T.U. 1985. The fishery, biology, and management of Atlantic sturgeon. Acipenser o.ryrhinchw, in North America.
Environmental Biology of Fishes Vol. 14. No.1, pp. 61-72.
RECEIVED
6
t
MAY 2 7 2014
mmr m f'ITv

2012, seven juvenile Atlantic sturgeon were captured, ranging from 0.63-1.06 in fork length
(mean: 0.86 m), during 23 gillnetting events of 14 hour duration each.9
Neither Alantic nor shormose sturgeon likely spawn at the project site, but rather spawn
significantly further towards the fall line. Their historic spawning area is thought to be around
Fayetteville, over 100 miles upstream. NCDENR is unaware of any observed reports of sturgeon
spawning on the Cape Fear or Northeast Cape Fear Rivers (see Figure 2 for the spatial
relationship of these rivers to the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek). Shormose sturgeon
spawning season in the Brunswick River is unknown at the current time, since so few have been
caught. It is assumed to be in the spring, as in other Southeastern rivers, but recent research
indicates that it may occur in the fall, or in both seasons, and current work that NCDENR DMF
is doing should answer that question for Atlantic sturgeon (F. Rohde, NMFS, pers. conun. to E.
Hawk, NMFS, March 28, 2013). NCDENR DMF has captured juvenile Atlantics under 0.3 in in
the river and many subadults, so they believe there is sturgeon production in the river system (C.
Collier, NCDENR DMF, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, April 29, 2013).
Project Effects
We have analyzed the proposed action to determine the potential routes of adverse effects to
shormose and Atlantic sturgeon. Adult sturgeon en route to spawning areas upriver of the
project site, and post -spawning adults and other life stages moving or returning downriver to the
estuary and sea, could be affected by bridge construction by being struck by construction
equipment (piles, work barges), construction -associated noise and turbidity, temporary or
permanent loss of spawning/foraging/sheltering habitat, and temporary disruption of
spawning/migratory behaviors. We believe shortnose sturgeon and Atlantic sturgeon are
unlikely to be adversely affected by any aspects of the proposed action, and that all project
effects will be discountable and/or insignificant, for the following reasons:
1. The in -water work moratorium proposed by NCDOT (January 1-May 31 of any year)
prohibits in -water work when these species are most likely to be present in the project
area, based on previous scientific surveys. That, coupled with their infrequent occurrence
in the project areas, render the risk (that spawning sturgeon will be in the project area
during construction and be affected) discountable. If necessary to conduct in -water work
outside of cofferdams or caissons or drilled casings between January 1 and May 31,
exceptions from the moratorium shall be limited to allowing extraction of existing piles
by vibratory hammer, drilling within pre -installed casings (i.e., casings installed outside
the in -water work moratorium), spudding of work barges, and excavating causeway to
natural ground. If other activities are subsequently proposed during the in -water work
moratorium, NCDOT shall reinitiate ESA consultation with NMFS on additional
conservation measures that may be implemented if additional in -water activities are
required. NCDOT may install and use bubble curtains (to reduce underwater noise
transmission) at any time of the year without need for approval from NMFS: as bubble
Performance Reports to NMFS by South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) for January 1-June 30 and July
I -December 31. 2012. Research and Management of Endangered and Threatened Species in the Southeast: Riverine Movements
of Shonnose and Atlantic Sturgeon. William Post. Tanya Darden. Douglas Peterson, Joe Hightower. Mike l.oeffer, and Chip
Collier. Investigators,
RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 2014
M1,
ni�rt,{.Trt7T1 I`PrV

curtains have only beneficial effects. In -water work may occur during the month of
January under the exception discussed above only if bubble curtains are used.
2. The bridges being demolished and the replacement bridges will occupy essentially the
same previously -disturbed footprint, so "additional" effects to potential refuge and
foraging habitat will be insignificant.
3. Operating construction machinery can physically strike and harm sturgeon. The
possibility of this occurring is discountable given the species' mobility, expected
avoidance behavior, and the in -water work moratorium that only allows in -water work to
take place when the species are least likely to be present. Therefore, the risk of direct
construction impacts (i.e., sturgeon being struck by machinery or materials) is
discountable.
4. In the unlikely event they are present when unfettered in -water construction is allowed
(June I -December 31), they are likely to avoid construction noise and activity (noise
effects are discussed below).
5. Construction noise could disrupt spawning or injure sturgeon. As suggested by the
Moser et al. study and the aforementioned 2012 SCDNR captureltagging/acoustic
tracking research, gravid sturgeon or juveniles could be present during a period when in -
water construction is authorized before the moratorium starts on January 1 (from mid -
September to December 2012, seven Atlantic sturgeon were captured by NCDMF; and
one gravid sturgeon was captured on January 6). Nonetheless, we believe the risk to
these sturgeon, and especially to gravid sturgeon, during this pre -moratorium time frame
from noise effects that could injure them or cause them to abort their spawning runs will
be discountable because (a) of their rarity (intensive sampling in 2012 by Moser et al. and
NCDENR has yielded infrequent captures of sturgeon in the Brunswick River despite
intensive sampling, and the earliest recorded capture of a gravid female (a shortnose
sturgeon) occurred on January 6, (b) there are alternate pathways off the Cape Fear River
(tributaries and creeks) that upriver -migrating spawning sturgeon could use to circumvent
the construction areas during construction (see Figure 2), and (c) vibratory driving of new
piles or bridge support structures, or removal of old bridge structures, generates a
continuous but low-level noise and is unlikely to cause more than noninjurious,
insignificant, behavioral effects to sturgeon. The same likely holds we for underwater
cutting implements (e.g., diamond cable) wielded by divers; noise levels are expected to
be low and cause insignificant and discountable effects to any sturgeon that may be
present nearby.
6. Impact pile driving necessary to build the temporary work bridges is likely to cause only
noninjurious insignificant effects because (a) of the piling composition and substrate, (b)
it will be temporary, of short duration (not more than 8 hours per day), and
noncontinuous (there will be periods of quiet between periods of noise), and (c) it is
unlikely to ensonify the whole river channel available to migrating or emigrating
sturgeon. Additionally, there are alternate migration routes available to them. Therefore,
the noise effects of impact pile driving will be insignificant.
7. Construction, particularly vibrating in bridge supports and pile driving for temporary
work bridges, could negatively affect spawning sites by sedimentation effects. Sediments
disturbed and turbidity generated during in -water construction will not affect sturgeon
spawning habitat because there are no known spawning sites near the project site.
R1iCEN6D
MAY 2 7 2014
DCM-MHD C"

8. Turbidity generated during in -water construction, embankment grading, work bridge
construction, etc. will have discountable effects on sturgeon foraging because of the low
likelihood that they will be present due to their low densities, the in -water moratorium,
and because turbidity controls (part of NCDOT's best management practices) will be
used to contain disturbed sediments; therefore, this effect will be insignificant and
discountable.
9. Sturgeon passage upriver and downriver could be partially blocked during construction
by in -water construction, pilings, work bridges, etc. However, neither the construction
process nor the completed bridges will appreciably block the river or creek nor impede or
alter sturgeon passage or water flow in Brunswick River or Alligator Creek.
Construction will not occur at both locations simultaneously, ensuring that there are
alternate pathways available to them (Figures 2-3). Therefore, this effect will be
insignificant.
10. Loud levels of intermittent or continuous construction noise from pile driving and bridge
span support installation could harm sturgeon if they were close to the noise source for
prolonged periods, or forced to move away from foraging habitat. However, NCDOT has
estimated that the duration of the vibratory driving/removing of piles will only be
approximately 32-48 hours per phase, spread over three phases, where one phase equates
to roughly one year of work (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, May 30,
2013). In addition, in 2003, during construction of the Wilmington Bypass Northeast
Cape Fear River Bridge, NCDOT conducted a study to monitor construction noise
propagation into adjacent wetlands. A vibratory driver/extractor and an impact driver
were tested. According to NCDOT's study, using ambient (baseline background) levels
to determine a distance that this or similar construction equipment would be safe to use,
the distance was found to be approximately 36 meters from the source for both the
vibratory driver and impact hammer. Both the river and the creek are greater than 36
meters wide at the construction site. As well, the moratorium limits in -water construction
to when sturgeon are most likely not present, sturgeon have the ability to avoid the
construction area if disturbed by the noise, and there is alternate similar habitat available
to them nearby (see Figure 2). Based on the above, we believe noise effects will be
discountable and insignificant.
11. The project will impact only a very small portion of the available foraging habitat for
shormose and Atlantic sturgeon, and these effects will be temporary, aside from the
actual area of river bottom displaced by the bridge support structures (see Figures 2-3).
The riverine/wedand impacts for the Brunswick River structure will be 0.02 ac for all
permanent bents, and 0.1 ac for all temporary bents. For the Alligator Creek work, there
will be 0.01 ac of impacts for all permanent bents, and 0.02 ac for all temporary bents.
Sturgeon will still be able to forage underneath the bridges post -construction. A review
of aerial images of the adjacent riverine areas using Google Earth Pro by the NMFS
project biologist showed that there are miles of alternate, similar, undisturbed habitat
nearby, up and downstream of the project site, where sturgeon could move to and their
potential foraging would be unaffected by project activities (see Figures 2 and 3). The in -
water area affected by construction is small by comparison. Therefore, project effects on
foraging habitat will be insignificant.
3.' �WV�Y Y4i✓
MAY 2 7 2014
DC.ZTV. C.rN

12. Spudding of work barges outside of the moratorium will have insignificant effects on
sturgeon that may be present because of their ability to move away and expected
avoidance behavior if disturbed.
Based on the above, NMFS believes that all effects of the proposed action are discountable or
insignificant, and thus the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any life stages of
shortnose sturgeon or the South Atlantic DPS of Atlantic sturgeon. Nevertheless, we
recommend that bubble curtains be installed around impact pile driving operations, to the extent
practicable, as this technology is known to reduce sound transmission through the water.
This concludes your consultation responsibilities under the ESA for species under NMFS's
purview. A new consultation must be initiated if a take occurs or new information reveals
effects of the action not previously considered, or the identified action is subsequently modified
in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an
extent not previously considered, or if a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that
may be affected by the identified action.
We have enclosed additional relevant information for your review. If you have any questions,
please contact Eric Hawk, consultation biologist, at [phone] or by e-mail at
[e-mail]. Thank you for your continued cooperation in the conservation of ESA -
listed species.
Sincerely,
A` Roy E. Crabtree, Ph.D.
Regional Administrator
Enc.:l. Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions (Revised March 23, 2006)
2. PCTS Access and Additional Considerations for ESA Section 7 Consultations
(Revised June 11, 2013)
File: 1514-22.L.1.NCDOT
10
MAY 2 7 2014
DCMMHDCI7y

SEA TURTLE AND SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS
The permittee shall comply with the following protected species construction conditions:
a. The permittee shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence
of these species and the need to avoid collisions with sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. All
construction personnel are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of
these species.
b. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties
for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or smalltooth sawfish, which are protected under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
c. Siltation barriers shall be made of material in which a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish cannot
become entangled, be properly secured, and be regularly monitored to avoid protected species
entrapment. Barriers may not block sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish entry to or exit from
designated critical habitat without prior agreement from the National Marine Fisheries Service's
Protected Resources Division, St. Petersburg, Florida.
d. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at "no wakelidle' speeds at
all times while in the construction area and while in water depths where the draft of the vessel
provides less than a four -foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will preferentially follow
deep -water routes (e.g., marked channels) whenever possible.
e. If a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within 100 yards of the active daily
construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions shall be
implemented to ensure its protection. These precautions shall include cessation of operation of any
moving equipment closer than 50 feet of a sea turtle or smalhooth sawfish. Operation of any
mechanical construction equipment shall cease immediately if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is
seen within a 50-ft radius of the equipment. Activities may not resume until the protected species
has departed the project area of its own volition.
f. Any collision with and/or injury to a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish shall be reported
immediately to the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division (727-824-
5312) and the local authorized sea turtle stranding/rescue organization.
g. Any special construction conditions, required of your specific project, outside these
general conditions, if applicable, will be addressed in the primary consultation.
Revised: March 23. 2006
�:. RECEIVER
MAY 2 7 2014
DOX-ham arY

POTS Access and Additional Considerations for ESA Section 7 Consultations
(Revised 6-11-2013)
Public Consultation Tracking System (POTS) Guidance: PCTS is a Web -based query system at
https://pcts.nmfs.noaa.gov/ that allows all federal agencies (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- USACE), project managers, permit applicants, consultants, and the general public to find the
current status of NMFS's Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)
consultations which are being conducted (or have been completed) pursuant to ESA Section 7
and the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act's (MSA) Sections
305(b)2 and 305(b)(4). Basic information including access to documents is available to all.
The PCTS Home Page is shown below. For USACE-permitted projects, the easiest and quickest
way to look up a project's status, or review completed ESA/EFH consultations, is to click on
either the "Corps Permit Query" link (top left): or, below it, click the "Find the status of a
Then, from the "Corps District t)ffce' list pick the appropriate USACE district. In the "Corps
Permit #" box, type in the 9-digit USACE permit number identifier, with no hyphens or letters.
Simply enter the year and the permit number, joined together, using preceding zeros if necessary
after the year to obtain the necessary 9-digit (no more, no less) number. For example, the
USACE Jacksonville District's issued permit number SAJ-2013-0235 (LP-CMW) must be typed
in as 201300235 for PCTS to run a proper search and provide complete and accurate insults. For
querying permit applications submitted for ESA/EFH consultation by other USACE districts, the
procedure is the same. For example, an inquiry on Mobile District's permit MVN201301412 is
entered as 201301412 after selecting the Mobile District from the "Corps District Office" list.
PCTS questions should be directed to Eric Hawk at [e-mail] or [phone].
MAY 2 7 2014

EFH Recommendations: In addition to its protected species/critical habitat consultation
requirements with NMFS' Protected Resources Division pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA, prior
to proceeding with the proposed action the action agency must also consult with NMFS' Habitat
Conservation Division (HCD) pursuant to the MSA requirements for EFH consultation (16
U.S.C. 1855 (bX2) and 50 CFR 600.905-.930, subpart K). The action agency should also ensure
that the applicant understands the ESA and EFH processes; that ESA and EFH consultations are
separate, distinct, and guided by different statutes, goals, and time lines for responding to the
action agency; and that the action agency will (and the applicant may) receive separate
consultation correspondence on NMFS letterhead from HCD regarding their concerns and/or
finalizing EFH consultation.
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) Recommendations: The ESA Section 7 process does
not authorize incidental takes of listed or non -listed marine mammals. If such takes may occur
an incidental take authorization under MMPA Section 101 (a)(5) is necessary. Please contact
NMFS' Permits, Conservation, and Education Division at [phone] for more information
regarding MMPA permitting procedures.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 m4
DCM-M" Crm

See Sheet l-A ,
See Sheet/—B For
b
STATE 1FNORTH TE OOH CL]A��1[y$O1LI A
DIVISION
OF HIGHWAYS
YY AYS
BR UNS WICK AND
Yg000URH Ir� � 'x �
NEW HANO VER COUNTIES
0�e BEGIN If
PROJECT z ` CT
* Li �� �t, '', snov=m •re
VICINITY MAP e7 T Q
OZZ& .4 V- , A pp
0
VD 5'1
BEGIN CONSTRU nON
BPE -STA. 13+11.
BEGIN
-Y2- 23
LOCATION. US 17-74-76 FROM THE NC 133 / SR 1472 INTERCHANGE
TO THE US 421 INC 133 INTERCHANGE
z TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES,
4 SIGNALS, AND SIGNING
b -LMED- POT STA. 85+80.63 RK =
-LLT- POT STA. 85+80.63 AH (34'LT) = I
-LRT- POT STA. 85+80.63 AH (34'R7) BEGIN EXIST. BRIDGE
-LLT- STq.708+9643 +E BRIDGE NO.108
(TO BE WIDENED) _
00. 103 ai
F3.00 +� �\�
o� 5 6 71
-%QED- �US 17-74-76INC 133
TOWN OF BCLVE E - __ _
\� O
D� 4�
L�
IROJECT R-3601
130+00.00
G
s) )
6
rL
RECEIVED
MAY 17 }
I
(
DCM MHD CITY
SR 1352
(BATIZESIIlP RD.
- n rUi IAUIT yr 1XJ rxiwjma.e m rY![Il[[Y {nc {Y8 UlYll.erl+• OVVIeULIe�eLiJ
I
OF LELAND AND BEUILLE.®Stantec
,'
PRELIMINARY PLANS
- CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
_ .9r 9. b 9Ne . AUN
J
- THIS IS A CONTROLLED -ACCESS PROJECT WITH ACCESS BEING LIMITED TO INTERCHANGES.
suw9 Cmpm90on
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
Pr6ST In E O floe of.
CONSULTING
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERANTEC
50 5 0 0 t
ADT 2014 = 79,625
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 1.462 MI.
8011.... Pre.Ali. Read, S.it, Joe R.IN88 NC 27606
Tel. [phone] Fe.. (919) 8SJ-7024 ....S,e....... .
Hoer
ADT 2035 = 107,000
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 0.205 MI.
a+.••.• xe. F-9672
of h
m: sreim4Rn snacR9retmSu
DHV = 11 %
PLANS
D = 55 %
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 1.667 MI.
PA
SM.NANRE:
:,
a
10 35 0 i0 t00
T = 6 % '
V = 60 MPH
' (TTST =3%+DUAL 3%)
NOTE: -LME0. &-LET- USED FOR PROTECT LENGTH.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
APRIL 24. 2014
JOSEPH T. KELVINGTON. P.E.
.
: o
,. q
r o
or
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
mot Jorcb�e
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
0
K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE
LETTING DATE:
JASON T. GADDY
ree��
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION
FREEWAY
OeoJFcr OPSILN eHern�e
10 )5 10 30
NCDOT CONTACT:
PROJECT ENGINEER - DESIGN BUILD GROUP
DECEMBER 17. 2013
PA
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
S,Gvl a

r
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
r'I
PROP. APPROX. I l2"ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
ES
PROP APPROX. 7"ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE,
S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LES. PER SQ. YD.
TYPE B25.0C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 399 LES. PER SQ. YD.
IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS.
PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE
C2
S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PEA SQ. YD. IN EACH
E6
B2S.6C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER I"
OF TWO LAYERS.
DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3- IN
DEPTH OR GREATER THAN S 12" N DEPTH.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
C3
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 PLESS ER QTHAN PI
TTO
DEPTH BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT L2" N
II
8" AGREGATE BASE COURSE
DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1"IN DEPTH.
G.4
PROP. APPROX. 112"ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
RI
P-6"
S9.5C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LES. PER SQ. YD.
CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
PROP. APPROX. 3- ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
C5
S9.SCAT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS.PER SQ. YD.IN EACH
R2
2-6" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER.
OF TWO LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE
C6
S9.SC AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF I12 ZBS PER SQ. VD. PER I"
R3
MODIFIED 5" MONOLITHIC GONG. ISLAND (KEYED IN).
DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1 F2"
IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 2- IN DEPTH.
DI
PROP. APPROX. 4- ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE 119.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LES. PER SQ. YD.
R4
9" X 18" CONC. CURB.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INIERMEDL47E COURSE,
D2
TYPE n9.OBAT AN
DEPTH,, TO CBE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT GE RATE OF ILESS THAN 2 12" IN R 1
R5
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED GONG. BARRIER. STD. 854.02
DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
D3
PROP. APPROX. 3-ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
R6
2=6" X F-0" CONCRETE WALL WITH HANDRAIL
TYPE 119.0CAT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LES. PER SQ. YD.
PARAPET
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
D4
TYPE 119.0C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LES. PER SQ. YD. PER P'
S
4" CONC SIDEWALK
DEPTH, TO RE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 212" N
DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
EI
PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.011,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LES. PER SQ. YD.
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
E2
PROP. APPROX. 4 l2" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE,
TYPE B25.011, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 513 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE
E3
B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF I14 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER I"
WI
VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT
DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN
(SEE DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO. 1).
DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5 J2" N DEPTH.
E4
PROP. APPROX. 3- ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE,
W2
VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT
TYPE B25.0C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
(SEE DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO. 2).
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE III UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
`z I
3:1 3.7
.O`25
VAR. DEPTH
U 6 �"
VAR. 0" TO I
025 .0�5
SEE ROADWAY
STANDARD DRAWINGS 852.01
FOR MORE I2VFORMA770M
DETAIL SHOWING MODIFIED S" MONOLITHIC CONC. ISLAND
*USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO 11
.
N�
® Stantec
SNmecCoreWtin95erriresl e
SINUUICU COfPOf8I100
R01 Frm'dn Roatl
m
SWe 00
NRIN91I, NO 27606
I91M(919 8
Fe I-702
Faz. (Sla) FSL]ala
.w.... wtecmm
Iimnse No. F-0673
FROJEa REFERENCE NO. SNF
R-3601 2
RN/ SHEET NO.
0AO.Y MIGN WDRAUUC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
SURFACE COURSE
L
SURPACE COURSE
INTERAEEDMM COURSE
I
I �"
MIN
IN RA MTR COURSE
BASE COURSE
I
RASE COURSE
I
2 L12
I
2 /2"
3"
3" MIN.
Fgx�ISAG
MIN.
3" '
DETAIL 1: METHOD OF WEDGING NO.l
PLANS
EXISTING PROPOSED
VARIABLE
I
3" GRADE I
PONI I SURFACE COURSE
SURFACE COURSE MINI SURFACE COURSE IN7F.RMEDMIE COURSE
TNrcuxrMDi COURSE
INTIIRMEDMTE COURSE BASE COCOURSE I EASE COURSE
BASE COURSE
EXISTING I ` 3" I '
212" PAP.NENT 2112
MIN M MIN MIN. ExrsrmG
PAE2MENP
DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO.2

i
0
PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl
IY? S9.5B
C2
3' S9.SB
C3
VAR. DEPTH S9.5B
C4
Ae' S9.SC
CS
3' S9.5C
C6
VAR. DEPTH S9.SC
DI
4' I19.OB
D2
VAR. DEPTH I19.OB
D3
3' II9.0C
D4
VAR. DEPTH I19.0C
El
4' B25.0B
E2
4Ye" B25.0B
E3
VAR. DEPTH B25.0B
E4
3' B25.0C
ES
7" B25.00
E6
VAR. DEPTH B2S.0C
ll
8'AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
RI
1' 6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R2
2'-4" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R3
MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN)
R4
9' X 18' CONC. CURB
RS
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER,
STD. 854.02
R6
2'' 6' X 1'-0' CONC. PARAPET WALL WIHANDR41L
S
4' CONC. SIDEWALK
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
WI
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I
W2
VAR.DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE la
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
6:1
VARIABLE
SLOPES
-LMED-
EDT EOT
VAR. 45'-3" TO 44'
21' 21'
2'-0" TO 3'-3" i 1 1 C5
CS 12-
,0_� TO 36" -�3
R
4 1 ll 3 4
II 3 GRADE TO THIS LINE
(N�
® Stantec
CoraWtl�ry SeMreslnc
STR'061®C9lP6fdE0t1
W"a nNoaE
,,,UBSF
s
, NC 9
Td pl,h
Fa. (919) 961-002e
U.. Na F-06TL
U.. N.
NOTE.
L GRADE POINT TRANSITIONS FROM -LMED- STA. 42+00.00 (45'OFFSET)
TO -LMED- STA. 53+00.00 (34'OFFSET) IT AND BE
2. EXISTING MEDIAN PAVED SHOULDERS TO BE REMOVED
3. ALL PAVED SHOULDERS ARE FULL DEPTH
(UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED)
4. FOR NARROW WIDENING 4" OF B25.OB
MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ABC.
MEDIAN BARRIER DETAIL
-LMED- STA.52+54.00 TO STA. 55+89.12 (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB)
-LMED- STA. 64+36.81 (END APPROACH SLAB) TO STA. 67+45.69
L
W
1
1025
I iY
C5 1
.025
6'
4'
I
61 61
4'
6'
.02
i CS
025
G-
i
.025�
025
.08.-
08
L
r
' GRADE TO THIS LINE LVAR. V TO 6'-7.5"
VAR. 6'TO 6'-7.5"
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
-LMED LT- STA.42+00.00 TO STA.55+95.76 (34'LT.) +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-LMED LT- STA. 63+91.03 (34'LT.) +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 85+80.63
-LMED RT- STA.42+00.00 TO STA.56+30.41 (34'RT.) +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-LMED RT- STA. 64+35.19 (34'RT.) +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 85+80.63
E TO
LINE
W NOe use
VARIABLE
SLOPES

$HER NO.
A
PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl
A, S9.SB
C2
3^ S9.511
C3
VAR DEPTH S9.SB
C4
A,-S9.SC
CS
3" S9.SC
C6
VAR. DEPTH S9.5C
DI
4" 119.011
D2
VAR. DEPTH 119.08
D3
3- I19.00
D4
VAR. DEPTH 119.00
El
4^ B25.OB
E2
44," B2S.0B
E3
VAR DEPTH B2S.OB
E4
3" B25.00
ES
7- B25.00
E6
VAR. DEPTH B25.00
JI
8•AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
RI
R6"CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R2
2''6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R3
MOD. 5- MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN)
R4
9- X 18" CONC. CURB
R5
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER,
SID. 854.02
1?6
2'-6" X 14• CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL
S
4" CONC. SIDEWALK
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
WI
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 1)
W2
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
LLT-
Stantec
"
`�
®
EN IN
12'
w
siamecconzumig 6ervYca ma
24' MEDIAN
ST.Wo9¢n Co`p9aliaO
691 Jones F2Amn Rm4
WiGR
EXIST.
Su g0
I
Ha. gq NO P
*a. ( 9161 &S1i666
PRE
10'
12' 72' VAR.12' 10'
Fax (es91 e6t-]g24
GRN/E TO 0�l 13' WiGR
U�.. N... Fmn
, W --- 3 6, q• T
�04 �O25 25 .02S- .02-25 .08
4:1 ---_ 67i
4 6-
T
VARIABLE 17" JI
SLOPES GRADE TO GRADE TO THIS LINE
gd THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
-LLT- STA.85+80.63 TO STA.108+96.43 +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-LLT- STA.111+8331 +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA.127+00.00
VARIABLE
SLOPES
RPAY-, RPBY-,-RPCY-, RPDY-,
RPLLT-
EXIST. 24'TO 62'
i
.m M.4x .as MAX
ROLLOVER GRADE WI ♦ ROLLOVER
POINT
F-Y S.E. I EX. S.E.
VAR. VAR.
/ U
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
RPAY- STA. 16+00.00 TO
STA. 27+82.65
-RPBY- STA. 11+34.50 TO
STA. I5+63.72
-RPCY- STA. 13+11.90 TO
STA. 15+61.90
-RPDY- STA.21+80.95 TO
STA.25+79.47
•-RPLLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 42+50.00
-RPLLT- STA. 42+50.00 TO STA. 44+77.45 (1.5" OVERLAY ONLY)
VAR. l3'T
WGR
t
VARIABLE
SLOPES
NOTE.
FOR NARROW WIDENING 4" OF B25.OB
MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ABC.
*• 3.1 SLOPE USED IN AREAS OF WETLANDS
V, E
-LRT- RPLRT-
I
I I
2' VAR. 24'TO I
I
VAR I
,TO 0'
12'
VAR. 0'
10,
GRADE -
TG 72'
POINT
W
1
.025
.0
.025,
.0044
GRADE TO J
GRADE TO TIHS LINE THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
-LRT- STA. 85+80.63 TO STA. 109+68.50 +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-LRT- STA. In+53.50 +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 130+00.00
-RPLRT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 18+50.00
VARIABLE
SLOPES
GRADE TO THIS
r+ RPLRT-
�G (LEFT TURN LANE)
I
24'TO 4S'
I
12 I .02 EX. S.E. I EX. S.E.
13"
TYPICAL SECTION NO. S
-RPLRT- STA.55+75.00 TO STA.62+25.00
VARIABLE
SLOPES

z
O
PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl
IV S9.5B
C2
3' S9.SB
C3
VAR. DEPTH S9.5B
C4
ry,' S9.5C
CS
3' S9.SC
C6
VAR. DEPTH S9.SC
DI
4' 119.0B
D2
VAR. DEPTH I19.011
D3
3' 119.0C
D4
VAR. DEPTH 119.00
El
4' B25.0B
E2
454' BIS.OB
E3
VAR. DEPTH B210B
E4
3' B25.0C
ES
7' B25.00
E6
VAR. DEPTH B25.00
JI
S' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
RI
I'-6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R2
2' 6' CONC. CURB AND GOITER
R3
MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN)
R4
9' X IS' CONC. CURB
RS
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER,
STD. 954.02
R6
2'-6" X 1'4' CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL
S
4' CONC. SIDEWALK
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
WI
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 1
W2
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
•3
RPAYLT- RPAYRT-
I I
I VAR. WIDTH I
1R. 15' I VAR. 15' VAR WIDTH is, I 15'
30' TO 30.15'
f f 2'
C2
ueM
TV :6:-j1
EXIST. 48'
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 6
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 7 AT THE
FOLLOWING LOCATION.'
RPBYLT- STA.10+00.00 TO
STA. 11+96.59
RPBYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO
STA.11+81.11
RPCYLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO
STA. 11+92.74
RPCYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO
STA. 13+31.56
RPDYLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO
STA. 13+23.43
RPDYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO
STA. 12+90.35
j -YNBL-
j -YSBL-
THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 8 THIS LINE
PROJER UFE CE NO.
SHEET NO.
R-3601
2-C
Stantec
WW SHEET NO.
0.0 AWAY p 51GN
HC5
ENGINEER
GIN W
ENGINEER
slweocos
SiWporeO CUEpoatlp0
R.d
Jo Frnl9n Nona
&rea
Su' W
2]fip6
Tm.pl.NC
PRELI
RY
PLANS
F.J19)M14P9
F� )Bt9)951-0039
m
UI
U..Na. JGi2
N.. F
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.6 AT TILE
FOLLOWING
LOCATION
-RPAYRT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 12+81.65
-RPAYLT- STA. 10+00.60 TO STA. 11+42.89
RPBYLT- R rPBYRT-
RPCYLT- L RPCYRT-
RPDYLT- RPDYRT-
VAR. WIDTH
I
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 7
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.8 AT TILE
FOLLOWING LOCATION.
-Y- STA. 18+20.00 TO STA. 21+14.42

PIS Sta WI vYJZ P/sm lL9tl/.9/
Pls Sto 11+86.71 P1Sto /6+9359 PIS Sta 21+44.01 P/s Sio Lit.
Bs = 4'2t 34J'
A = 36' 55' 593 (RT)
Os = 4-W 385- A = 23. 22' 02.4' (RT)
As = 2' 04' 371
Bs = 5' 03'.
Ls = 280.W
D = 3' 06' 50A'
Ls = 280A0' D = 2' 5Y 532'
Ls = 145.W
Ls = 145,00'
LT = 18612'
L = 1.166.08'
LT = 1867/' L = 815E7'
LT = 96b7'
LT = 967Y
ST = 9338,
T = 614.46'
ST = 9338' T = 41359'
ST = 4834'
ST = 4837'
R =. 1.840.W
R = 2A00.W
SE = 0A8
SE = 0A8
Ol
OS = 70 MPH
DS = 70 MPH
c?)
O�
41 1 Y
.— ....
Ls = 320A0' D = 2' ST
c .. v.i .. ... 1.r .. ... 6 ..5 4' .. ...
Ls = 200A0' D = 2' 4l'' s = 6'00' 082 =
LT = ' L = 1J98J4'
'
LT = l3.66, L = 2/3J8'
L 2 ,6 '
Ls = 200D0' L = 720b9'
L
1067
ST = l0673' T =
ST = 66b8' T = 58'
LT = T =
R = 2A/OA0'
2.010
R = 2J35A0'
2)
87.45'
ST = 87.45' R 955A0'
.955.W
SE = OD6
SE = SEE PLANS
SE = 0.08
DS = 70 MPH
DS = 70 MPH
DS = 50 MPH
C®
Stantec
aonsvXbp seM®+�nc
SIWrot®CArptttalian
801J
eola. F�aaaa
ano
RWelgsmm
1,NL fi
(919)
F. tale a5lam4
».rd mwF „
lice�rsq No.F-0BJ2 1
No.
N¢
-
REFERENCE:
FOR —LLT— & —LRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS 20-21
FOR—RPLLT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEET 26
�_ FOR—RPLRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEET 27

PROTECT REFFRENCE NO. SHEET NO.
-RPLLT- -Y3- R-3601 12
K PI Sto 36+57.46 PIS Sto 40+1&6 Pl Sfa l4+6850 'H7 ® Stantec RN/ SHEET NO.
0= 20'46'27B'(LT) es = 3'2937P WWWAY OESIC4 HYDR.WuCS
D = 3'29'37P Ls = 200,00' D = l8'59'S83' s1aN.cc00.Wl,Sery sln,, ENOLNEEF EKGNEER
L = 59463' LT = 13306' L = 256A6 Slwoouo Corporzuon e01J. FRrFkU. ROaO
K T = 30062' ST = 66.69, T = /3632' S. 300
K R = 164ODY R = 30/56' Rawo, NO ETSOs
K Yt TA (919) 951E0ss
SE =EXIST SE =EXIST
K K F. (OFFR8 1-7026
• " DS = 65 MPH K N F.uNe FAE K PRELIMIN RY PLANS
" w ll¢IISB NO F,06T1 W NOL VK WN.T0.VCIFON
\ K K
IF
YC/
h K ;'J"� K 43 K ..ur.` " \. �✓._,-�__ \ �,S " : LLT- POT Sto.43+0350
- 3- POT Sta. IO+OOAO
}•- " / _ _ _..ems � r.` � � ; �.^�re..ts.j.':..:�.,,�� ..,1'^r,ti�,�".,.r"^:'"'"'� ; wcons
K K \
NEM NANEVER SOIL & WATEF COIJISERV 0ISjRl ,�,>'F\\t K EEGRV" CON$TRiICTiON t' fly,
oB 15e4 PG 716r (({\\ K -Y3- POT�'q^T�A. I0+23.60
OW ASPHNT SHOULDER K I �
BEGIN L5 {
BERIA Ol1RER FROM -RR1T- STA Illop
Ork!q
C'RLi
-RPLLT- PO� SETA.
TO 40,00 LT
-RPLLT- ST Sto. 4/+5/.47 '
-RPLLT- CS Sta. 39+51.47 .p
- - ..
1\.�.
�i� — �
... _",_ �
"i I
� p �
_
` `
f„J';.:^:,•.... K _ i K K K.
y.
FF�v
vK Ol
" K
T �nV
'p � � � — \Lw 3 F 2s�
C
� _
4 raw^ `^F 'l - ^✓,+✓"-'F'wn'��•T ✓+��'i F L F _
`
�
\sours
F Nth GRASS I6LAN0
F
/� .a,..v-
IS
/ F F
lY
\ RETNN
K K \\ ///
/ U/B''U
115 76E r
k /+�/q(B 1 //
O%
/SPIUAL / .....f ~�
S'••J'
II.
RFIAT A GRACE CUT
60+46 LT 275 FO j` ' 1
SEE DUAL 12A
K
C.
c �i
\
K i' -,1
/j
URE iDPEP C
N~•
saacS
TRAFFIC DIAGRAM
US 17-74-4211
26,925 NC 133 26,925
39,600 39,600
575 564
800 800
I,/50 2014 ADT
1,600 2035 ADT
SR 1352
(BATTLESHIP RD.)
CT;]
Fe PNMED �IS-(t%INB i
-MATCH EXISTING K / ) PARTIALCOACRETE—
/ " { ISV D TO BE REUX,,
GRA5S IS
G>VNU IF
# K
GIN CONSTRUCTION
_ K J2PLRT P T STA. 55+75.00
K �
uss NC
K f�K K K
K _ BATTLESHIP
K CONNISK
K " OB 6 PCC 96 96 VIF
2+50.00
JIf
END CONSTRUCTION " K
RPLLT-POT STA. 44.*77.45
------
ti+1.iT\.vhrv'�W
/ N O'46'37.8'E � � usns)us vavaacssns/xcros ---� ��'—
P -RPLRT F POT4Sta.62+3/62 PIPE
/� ✓
♦. 33PROP.Y-6R'
US00
R/ /K _
MATCH ExI INGy
jj \ I
1Y fib? If ^ `di5 }`� // t� \\�€ v
Ir.� Y woo9s END "CONSTRUCTION K
0 LL i°V, -RPLRT- POT STA. 62+25.00
J1 PRW.Y-8 Z cc^�t "
COMCCURB RPLRT- POTSh7 60+8226= K
d _ -1'3- POT 5ta. 11+8550 K
\ K STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA K
I IL`s" K DETAIL 12A
- w
fp - END CONSTRUCTION K I
-Y3- POB STA.13+50.00
;lr�r !
l¢ ll �� —.— — gtf,Y]- ���: •✓✓r""""" FROM JIPEAT- STA 57+00 TO STA 60+30 LT
/1` `",' " ' RPLLT— ST,A.39+51.47 TO STA.44+86.69 LT
+ IYATCH, TO EXISTING SHOULDER.
1,REFERENCE:
FOR —RPLLT— PROFILE VIEW.SEE SHEETS 26 & 27
P j FOR—RPLRT— PROFILE V/EW,SEE SHEET 27
/ K /
r K

SPKLLLF DI DETAIL 90
CUT W
INM I. SI STMIUMID 9KE ORCH
'M+" RmM
N A\ . .1 M°""° N0"""
V.F D d DE D y� •cr
P0.0FC) REFERENCE NO.
R-3601
0.M' SHEET
® Stantec ROADWAY DESIGN
FNGW DE
SHEET NO,
9
NO.
HEENGIN CS
FNGINFE0.
-LRT
' B Min D� IfL Wn D- 1'Rrvl u -
SWWConsutlNB SwrrYxalnG
P1 Sto 101+4622 PIS Sfa 106+78.06
El-H - x . B.xk
STWmteD Co"radaD
831 Jolty* FFeNRD Rows
A = 6' 57' 53.3' (LT) 65 = 0' 45' 033'
D = 33' LIT = 200.00'
aAr_ Su las+3r ro srR_ no+Do M1TI h -uv SIR_ RA+Do FITR�DI
pA
elc xreoB
T.L(9R0)8516 PRELIMIN
RY PLANS
L = 927.49127.49' LT = 13333'
\
E'7
FB..(919)B51-)0xe Do HOE MR, ED m.savrnoN
T = 46432' ST = 66.67'
WwW.iWhr_cOm
R - 7.630A0'
LIconve No. F4672
SE = 0.025
DS = 60 MPH
gti
gti
Y �...
Y
* LS
j"JI
IF aarwa a,. •_.
• � N P NWEST TWF'
. I{U flE[Uwp WFUELEPD.N LINE O
t FCB LMS LBL p iTI
j5 C
TOWNCREEI( TWP
TFoIpO STI
CEPCi ei DL C. ELFCixOrvF wvESl LAl10.V
1,,,
OF rxS LINE.vELpS END DF pGCP- Ux a!
R9
�w,�
-
rws LDCADUN
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _-
.. �
BERM
�
* *
r,�;r�✓-r`;,\ -SHOULDER
aLT-toe+re
`\\\*
Rr
o BRIDGE
10 BRIM
*
f�
O
r
H
w000s * *
\ Y * !'M
*
BEGIN BRD)G .108
323'bw—TRaviS lbx
Y
Lu
*
_ ,,,,w.*.-:..,,.,., _--
`-T'4. .iZ1ja+
I NxRRDD ! >s V 5 II-E.
-LLT-STA./08+96.4
mrulu"'I
- _ _ — — _ _ _ * s
J iV`
W
r
VIE,
o!L sL•PVc c0xouis OW Eo /
4
_
'
{A
__•`_ ___ u Ainl Arer ML
T r_ r n `
_ _
_ - _ - - _
-F -ry Fv
- _ _ _ _ _ __L'_ __ __ _ _ >
__ _ _ __
-ti ro - T - -���r,
F0: Ar6i- GGTb',6 TM'r
Sit WExDEp VxOEP PFIOCE
TIME HE5 Fd[IIIIIEi dL50
Lla
--� _
W
_
_ _ !
CDNIAWED IN SAME [4YCUL5
FI
4�
..._
Lu
-LLT- .� t US A s V 15
lr v Y VS is w V XC /SJ s vFalA91E ES' '^
` XISr. BRICG TD
wl NED
-
W
EM
N
F
O
Q
F
F F F F :u
� LJ I
I
F F x'SKdAL Cllr BASF ORCH
aAT-STAIN+37 TO SIR_ 110. Do LT i
SEE DETNL 9A 911
t�f � LJ r0
SHOULDER BEAN GUIIE0.
t;ws, -I
R wP MP
HOULDER M3
/JY TOY
0 ELT SrA I09+161109+P)9,®I+
MIO a1T- STA I11+91 RT
So. IMMI END OF
S F BAIOGE TO-LLT3ySTA 111
RIP
SO IISHOLIIDE0. A* y
_
�r 90 MEB{R-RI�ADGE
*
r
{Ii
F4
I
h4r-I°6+n LT TO BDDGF OLNIFT
COO
WATER ELEV-1.33'
_T1+stIHiv1711+833/ a B uP'av
1 ONIFI PROTKIfON
f"
(n
til
CLB RIP RUF
OULTEI P0.0RCT N�t�eRV BAPPAP
t1 CJ I:7 (�
090
'\ HGH9WF EFAM
* \
�I { `""-LLT nA 11 )0 \
JCH
F I
=
_ 0901 0 tiY pURFFWROTECTION
T
EL Lr9'
y 11N00 0.T
I I) ENDOOFER DGE TGDIif0. i .✓ ,114.0 9I
-- — F
-- -- F
i f i
`
\
.f Y(
¢ -IRT- I151 W LT
J
50/P.S.TRAVSIrION I
N!Y
GRA11 350 S s 0 .r D90
N
I11 T
/ q F t 90
W
_ �
S S �4 N �+
DS n S / us i+w / us I6 w I ^•ndln.' . A� _ =a �...r � `-ari�ikt �:Y^.'A'w-.•
`RELE „z.:F, D:u.T.: ,i':0'4 •x' yam. }`; 1B.3GL-0:FG f .. _'-� ii :.ixG F4, �.,
y. n..,.nw.a m �i iY
vt
�r
/ M G] 5
ws V �L
�
W
L II OF RAP _
�- —_ --, b-', •.••9
i F
4 >�
6u_ 'wC'
.F3-'�'^"3ffi{ 4f-'r7 $4Vt �f% OD ID `2?:•k3fx( A:.-`c'�I.a�°.�1'rB.xGl
DGPi LN'III-r
_ __ ___ _ ___ _
[
_ _ -"-* re: G - I!
--- -- GwTh�
.. ...M�
1
FKu
y * Y — �-=—�-`TP./`-"�':'_
G!�'LANE TAPER DUrSIa
.. E• F _Y
OOOS 9,.
* *yv^-
F �Vj. N ..fw SO TLJAr
/NG / \
r`"'n" \ wueos
M E
09 i _-('/
CL II:M RRF!
I 3vF� * p
I ,�'�
r
--
}'
90 F a
' wp005 (ENODOFFBRIDGE TOMiR�0 FIT
iPROACN
i .9QauNE raaysaroN
* *
!w * * '.\\
1
BEGIN BRIDGE d.107
-LBZjSTA. 109+68.
\
END SLAB*
t' L67- STA.112+77.68
-LRT-'CS S1o.106+1139
i Y I {' BEG APP O
lr*
END �S
ENDS I/2+53.50
S3.507Y
Y
*
I
1 * * * -LRT=
STA. I09#443
-LRT- .112
I' LRT- ST Sta. II
* * * * *
t Y OoI
N C STATE O AOTNO ITT * • I\\ i� '\SHOULDER
\HOID 0]1ERLA O TO
De 0III 2TS 9m+BRIDGE
\ t
JJ r
Y
Zi
Y
i
3
* *
*
* *
Y *
*
REFERENCE:
FOR
-LLT- & -LRT- PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS
19-20
s
FOR
-LLT- & -LRT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE
SHEET 2-G

-LLT-
-LRT-
Pls Sto 87t1873 Pi Sto 92+77J0 Pis Sto 98+3423
PIs Sto 96+1723
PI Sto 10I+4822
As = 0' 42' 583' A = 7.02' O3.4' (LT) es = 0' 42' S83'
es - 0' 45' 033'
A = 657' S33' lLTI
Ls = 20ODO' D = 0' 42' 583' Ls = 20OD0'
Ls = 20OD0r
D = 0' 45' 033'
LT = 13333' L = 982J7' LT = 13333'
LT = 13333'
L = 927.49'
ST = 6567' T = 4917O' ST = 6667'
ST = 6667'
T = 46432'
R = 8,oww
R = 7.63OD0'
SE = 0D5
SE = 0D25
DS = 80+ MPH
DS = 60 MPH
-LLT- SC Sto. 67+8539
DETAIL BA
SPECIAL GGOE M P V °RCH
Mirt O� 1.0'Min RnJ
Ln
0"
a LT- SlA 05+80 TO RA 90+50
-LLT- STw 90+50 TO STA.91+w
Q
Z
�r
® Stantec
SIWW4T CATpOFd00D
ml J. F.Ndl
00 FnNGin ROa0
3W
BWb 300
AeHg0,N0143m
E000
E(919)
F. 19197 &81-]038
F W
W n�wm
Ase
LH9nse Nw F4e72
PROM PEFFPFNCE NO. SHM
R-3601 B
PAY S"EET NO,
IOMWAY OF51GN mauuc
fNWNEER FNGWHA
PRELIMINPCRY PLANS
m nror use w wxswVrnmv
I grl-
1 * * I NEW HANOVER SO& & WATER CONSERV GIST
I 08 R3Q PG 776 i * * ' Y' i' * *
s* * * A
I -LLT- ST (Sta. 99+6756
-LLT- CS Sta. 97+6756
I x • * * L7 * fl�s.,rti,.'""'„`""""..n.:-.,,r,,.�'.:r..n;r" t;7 w�-.,.;. .rv+t.�:..'.}`",-r..''" ^- • i< L„s,t: a,.
�f {`^+, p � * * * u+,>, a.. ° f * * * 1,,.,, * * * * ,t * i^^`v� ouunPPRRc N
W - I`i: B `th.i ^'Y._t k V .alms 4 ("�✓'v^, f T ice.✓; Q * 2- r s _ _ _. _ _ -a, _ _ _ _ _ _ y _ _ * e x
W j
=SPBC14 GRADP'MEDIAN DITCH . y) µ-! w vyvf�.r'"4
* I STA DETTL-U60 TO 9*0+50 Q * i xv- j ���' RF/N OUT 3 *
fA 'fiA-".v'4.. t''S,zv. "� _ u \-�. * x * L�*t^fi �*
lw C SEND OF HPE�
0001 CL 0RAP
W - ouTLERIP r vWxoT
ErnoN _
i
LLJ
rIpITiti1- Q Q 00 ...............w...^_. .^"^"_-`"'_a"�,f• - _ _ F -
101
i.>d� I- - - - - - - - `EY` _ _-"^'^++.`�.....ri1, ..www............--�:':'�vi Tnc
Lo
QGv7 11.: `w.i�.o�•J —_—_
Q ' C.MU 3511 RS :
Gi-1 t.1� LS
L
F�ll Lv _
dTU+y, mod. Kp5/N571W/K)6Lu
♦ Q Q F
ADNT GMTE 00 00 NFDOT CPS
f
-WON. 84473-3
Lam — f F f
FTwFlLL WTM ROWABIE
THUIL REMOVE
F � FILL WITH ROWABIE�
_—� _v_ F _ F P F _ F 4 F MATDW F F\ F
F F` -f =-• -mr;
UAO GMDF N TV DTC" wuoes 'v L
SIT alT- 90+50 TO 91+00
C; •o.a. V '� sfP gEruL Of,
-CRT- TS
* * * f�4?I CITY OFF EELYILLE
CRY Of BELVILLE Q I u
*
Q
O
Q
Ir
0 W�
F`-
!941783�f
FFF Fxl� OELi '
_ NORTHWEST TWP, news 1
TOWN TWP I L E rAPER q?5/DE RIGII
I
s
-LRT- eSC S1a. 96+83 '' * * i 9Y3'IM'E rawsmON
1
I
OI
* x
UNKNOWN
* * * * * * * * * 1 -
* x * *
I *
I
REFERENCE:
FOR —LLT— & —LRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS 18-19

w
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
-LMED- STRUCTURES
EXIST. -LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER PROP. NC 133 RIVER (RIVER ROAD)
-YSBL- -I' -YNBL-
1 l
MIN. 48' 5" _
10'MIN. 1 2' 1 rs' I I I ra ! w
1
8'IO 29
I 9"
1
1
T
Crfo�
`0
3 ozs
-ozs �
.025
_ _
02
.0:
DETAIL OF —Y— UNDER US 17 BRIDGES
(MINIMUM DIMENSIONS)
MIN. 31 -5"
2' 1 70'MIN.
® Stantec
Spnlec ConwM1N9 SVN¢al�
8Bt JOnB9 Fmnklln RwE
sung h.
MN9R NC ]
1
Fa(%B)fl51-]024
wxv�. �nmec¢m
liana Na F-BB]]
09TV'
Ens o�c0ot,
yR

v

✓
7l „owi y
P
�i
�_ ,To-Q,.F, ice:-° � � -- �--•
- 17-� \
AW
go
jo
i f,: �---. y• Ii 1 I yr 1� ? _ \ -
¢ �. 7�.���•� , I $�_ ice- �.� ;a` �• d�, 11 - �\\tj 1 � ,� '�3. 'e �`,.
} �`- �—n' �.y,_;.r �..��; mar � � T i1 \ • -�, — _, ,... .6 �'^—"—'' ` �;' \ sy�{�p. �
% 'rar':S� • G} sir �\ .Q �y,
REFEFEM'E,
FM? COME WA b ALGMY£M IHFp ffVf SEE SHEET 2-F.
FWt - EO- PIMFIIE VfE SEE SHEET If.
Fdt -FPN- flPNLT-,b -APRM- PFOFI(£ VIEN SEE SHEET 22
F°F-RPq'-,-PP LT-.b-FPB/NT- PWIV VlW SEE SHEET 2
FWt -RF-.-FPLTLT-d -N W- PMVIIE VIEW SEE 5HE£T 24
FOR -FPO-.-RPOYLT-.b - aP - PIA`H£ V/fl 5£E SHEET M
FOR -Y2- PM U VtE SEE SHEET 2fl
FOR-Y- P66`ILE VIEW SEE SHEET 2A
FOF O .L Y MEMZ LWP.WO WEFGI E IIACL MMD L(8
SEE SHEETS 21 ANO 2-K
ss
$t � ®Sta,rcec
Iff
2� l w. .'.vn
nw/cvr ubn,avo vrowH Fon
i_
31R
Elm—
JEMSM REA/OVAL
19 PROPOSED SIGNAL LOL'ATIONS
SFt I'm
fvnfncs nrt) ' TRAFFIC DLIGRAM
US , T0.TJ
US ,T-
`_ MC M LU
M". T
ii AOT
RC LIYW Rn

IF
P
Mfia REHMNOE NO. SHFFf NO.
P
R-3601 2 -I
m®
Stantec
RM SNEET NO.
gOAENG OFSIGN NMGINM
FNGINFFA iNGWEER
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
SY @CCOnsWWg 53rkESInG
�14hNC27 �
SU ]Ib
RLeM1, NO ]G98
Fec(919)E.51.1M4
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
w�ix'ffiNe �
IiQve Na F-0ET3
00 NOE VSC PO WY@IOVITOY
-LMED- STRUCTURES
EXIST. -LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER PROP. NC 133 RIVER (RIVER ROAD)
*�ZA,- ~s4}•�
-YSBL- L -p_ -YNBL-
MIN.48'-S» i
MIN.3Y-S»
10'MIN. 2' 15' l5' i 15' I IS' ]S'
2' 1 10'MIN.
uax.
sT
8'TO 29'
i y»I 91,
YE
Sys
A�p1Zi 1pA
i Gro0ix�s I
O�
fok
ozs _025 � -.025 _ A71-
y✓-5 O'�G
I �
DETAIL OF -Y- UNDER US 17 BRIDGES
(MINIMUM DIMENSIONS)

e
1 e
m� m m �.xw..N•._...,r.._ua�.��"��'.-�"` I azcrr s ,�`` yyypppo}}}
� T� _-_ 1 �� c �lll I� / / All\\� •r I � �� � `�'�'a
All
Qzl
IOU
�1
/T f j _
d
e `��� i w �I� C-6(,t�...% �a�" � � a; - � ".• 1\ )'t•; �i�' ' \\\ \erh�... \� O 6 ' � \
T
er�amyae +so
�T
IY'j
Z 8J
aT• �
.L@
�mib yJ
.mJ
\ OIV
i� REFER£RCE.
' FOR ONE WA & AUE MW INF0.91I M SEE SX££T 2-F.
FOR -WED- P9 la V/£N' SEE S U 10.
/ FOR -RPN RPNLT-.& -FPNFi Pfi ffl VIEM SEE SKEET 22.
FOR RPBT-.-FP®'LT .& RPBTRI PAvlf£ V/EW SEE 5NEU 0..
FOR FAY-. R0.7LT .&-RfYYRJ v(NfR£ VIEM 5£E S E£T 24.
FOR RPM . P MT .8 -R a@ - PW;F VILW SEE SKEET 2S
FOfl 12 PR6�ll£ VILW SEE SKEET 20.
FOR Y- ARM2 V/EW SEE SKEET Z
FOR OETNL OF ON£RWN LYN/ONO WTERCR IINCL M AND V VE )
SEE SREETS 21 A D 2-K
GPAAIIC SC
`
. p �
®SLaEMec
roe —�0
vnvaaavrrww.w vmmR
EgOM PAVEMENT REMOVAL
19 PROPOSED SIGNAL LOCATIONS
SRMnTRAFFIC
DIAGRAM
(V2IAGb DR) 7dW
OS LJ-]0.]6
DS 1]
MC DJ
m
Mon T
} y
1�1
NC LiLDIVPR FD

v

SHEET NO.
2
0
PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
CI
I Iva' S9.SB
C2
3" S9.5B
C3
VAR. DEPTH S9.SB
C4
b s9.sc
CS
3" S9.SC
C6
VAR DEPTH S9.SC
DI
4" 119.9B
D2
VAR DEPTH 119.OB
D3
3' 119.0C
D4
VAR. DEPTH 119.00
E!
4" B25.OB
E2
4Y BISOB
E3
VAR. DEPTH B2S.0B
E4
3" B25.0C
ES
7' B25.0C
E6
VAR. DEPTH B25.0C
I!
8"AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
RI
I '�' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R2
2'-0" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R3
MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN)
R4
9' X 18" CONC. CURB
RS
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER,
STD. 854.02
116
2'' 6- X 1'4- CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL
S
4" CONC. SIDEWALK
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
WI
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I
W2
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
VAR. 2' l5' 15'
10'MIN.
�A�O ASLO
CTJON C2 _02.5 1 02.
Ts T _---
6" U
I 1
GRADE TO THIS LINE 11"
j -YNBL-
l�l
.02 �
GRADE TO THIS LINE
-Y-
A' 12' VAR. /2'-6'I VAR V
® Stantec R-
POP WAY
SbNec CenSO'Senimslnu WUNI
&E W00t. c.p.cm BO, Jort Foots o Road
-Y- softam
Raleq� NC 27809
T.t(9,9)BSlE
-YSBL.- -YNBLr
.Ie No. R PRE
uena.Fasn m
I VAR SEE PLANS l VAR. SEE PLANS I
15' 15' 15' 2' VAR
I VAR I 81TO 29' 10'MIN.
91, 9., 6„ 6„ �/
GRADE j
R POINT2 1 C2 2 0'E(�Ol1
i
I � 02.5 .025 I .025- 02
YJY'
r__--
I U
11"
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 9 GRADE TO THIS LINE
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.9 AT THE
FOLLOWING LOCATION.
yE -y -Y- STA. 21+14.42 TO STA. 26+64.62
-YSBL-
GRADE
tPoINT
TYPICAL
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10
TO 0' I TO 0'
VAR. 12'TO 0'
4'
1
i
i
I
4'
2
I GRAUS
PoINT
'=
C2 I
08 `25
A25
..025
.0_2�S
"025, 0�
r
---- USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. ]OAT THE
3y FOLLOWING LOCATION.
6" T S -Y- STA. 26+64.62 TO STA. 36+14.00
El 11" El
GRADE TO THIS LINE * EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED
3ITO 6:1 -_-_ 6i1
VAg SfiCT10K$ T
W -- ll' E7 T 3 f (ll=lllc(ll VAR/ABLE
$E>✓ SLOPES
Ill=
EXIST. 24' GRADE TO TINS LINE ,
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 11
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. H AT TILE
FOLLOWING LOCATION.
-Y- STA. 36+14.00 TO STA. 41+95.21

NO. I S EH NO.
r
Z
0
PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl
14:• S9.SB
C2
3' S9.SB
C3
VAR. DEPTH S9.5B
C4
14." S9.SC
C5
3' S9.5C
C6
VAR. DEPTH S9.5C
DI
4' 119.0B
D2
VAR. DEPTH 119.0B
D3
3' 119.0C
D4
PAP -DEPTH I/9.00
El
4' B25.OB
E2
4/2 B2SoB
E3
VAR. DEPTH B2S.OB
E4
3' B25.00
ES
7' B25.0C
E6
VAR. DEPTH B25.00
Jl
8'AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
RI
l-6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R2
2-6'CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
R3
MOD. S' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN)
R4
9' X 18" CONC CURB
RS
CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE HARRIER,
STD. 854.02
R6
2'-6'X P4' CONC. PARAPET WALL WIRANDRAH
S
4" CONC. SIDEWALK
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
WI
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I
WIDEPTH
ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
-Yl- (MAIN STREET)
I
1
t
EX. S.E.
I
I EX. S.E.
C/
U
MILL 112" OF
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
REPLACE WITH 112" OF S9.5B.
-YI- STA.10+00.00 TO STA.11+82.50
08
3:1 --- -- S
GRADE TO THIS LINE
I RAISED PLANTING ISLAND
VAR. O'TO 17'
1,
SEE PLANS
VAR. WmTH
SEE PLANS
R/
R/
CI
C2
T
T
C2
Cl
EX. S.E.
EX. S.E.
(F}�-
a
El
-6.4 L El
U
V
7"
LGRADE TO
THIS LINE
7"
DETAIL TO
BE USED
IN
CONJUNCTION W/TYPICAL SECTION NO 14
-Y3- STA. 12+65.00 TO STA. 12+12.00
-Y3- STA.11+00.00 TO STA.11+38.00
OFFSET
CUL-DE-SAC
.02-
I GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO.12
r,
j-Y2- (BLACKWELL ROAD)
I
R. VAR. 6'
'TANS SEE PLANS
EXIST. 36' 2
I
GRADS
I POINT
W2 I 2 C2
I
02 02 08
T
(N�
®Stantec
CauuNng beM¢aln<
$TRbOrtn C019gOB0Il
20Jaw FrzN&n Roa4
lJ. W
SNh
22404
Telepli s
((919)01-7 4
Fmc (9t B)851-]ON
F
Wxv.5t9ihC1'Ali
uceosaNa F-0fi]2
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.12 AT THE
_=y FOLLOWING LOCATION:
-YI- STA.12+63.00 TO STA.14+40.00
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO 13
-Y3- (BATTLESHIP ROAD)
I
1
I
t
C2
� L
U EI U
EXIST. 27'6" TO 63'
GRADE TO THIS LINE)
TYPICAL SECTION NO.14
VARIABLE
SLOPES
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.13 AT THE
FOLLOWING LOCATION:
-Y2- STA.23+00.00 TO STA.24+16.09
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.14 AT THE
FOLLOWING LOCATION]:
-Y3- STA.10+23.60 TO STA.13+50.00

I

v
SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT WIDTH
TO BRIDGE WIDTH RELATIONSHIP
vvl®
Stantec
S1anJ C n9R Wxslx
SIWOOfm COIPORII00
F. RoaO
sd1 3waFranUm
E
WS00
Ral(glq)gh Cl1
Tel (019)
Faz (9191951-]02F
IBM
w.�w. unrecom
llmrce No.F-0Slt
PEOhR Ryi CE
R-360I
WW SHEET
ENG° EM
PRE LIMI? RY PLANSI
. N VY i tONSIRVCT V
BRIDGE NO.103
HSTL
BEGIN- RIDG +I.00 +F-
END BRIDGE .
-LMED- STA. 60+13.00 +f
q
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-LMED- STA. SS+8912 +/-
o d
END APPROACH SLAB
+
o
l
+
+
a
A
I c9wu 950 na
h l
i
e o �
o
$
—N
^
- n
a
ME
o-n-
oIII_
z
_-----------------
---
Q
o
C�
MF-fn� PROP. SBG
MF 111
\
1�s
PROP. SBG
\
\\'
NOTE: SEE SHEETS 5 & 6 FOR PLAN VIEW
SEE SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR PROFILE -LMED- PROFILE
SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR -LMED- OVER
BRUNSWICK
RIVER
BRIDGE N0.107
a
END
�
LErvE o-n
+
END BRIDGE
-LRT- STA. 112+5350 +/-
BEGIN BRIDGE
-LRT- STA. 109+68. 0 +F
4 PROP. SBG
y PROP. SBG ` J
PE III /
T9F In
r
T-
o
�
ocomc
H
so na
4 ME m /
ME I c PROP . SBG
PROP . SBG
o
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN
APPROACH SLAB
N07E:
SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLAN VIEW
-LRT-
STA.1o9+C433 +/-
SHEET 19 & 20 FOR -LRT- PROFILE
SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR
-LRT- OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK
BRIDGE NO.108
(TO BE WIDENED) END BRIDGE
c -LLT- STA. Ill+8331 +f
Z
i m'y a, EYPE o-n a
a
GMU 350
X.
aT-
«� O
a \ PROP. SBG
BEGIN BRIDGE
-ELT- STA. 108+96.43 +F
NOTE: SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLAN VIEW
SEE SHEET 19 & 20 FOR -LLT- PROFILE
SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR -LET- OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK

NO. I 4 m NO.
W
STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTIONS
LMED- STRUCTURE
-LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER BRUNSWICK RIVER
F,-LMED-
3. 3^
67'
o1'
10' 12' 12' 1.1 21'
L' 12' 1 1'1 12' 10'
1
1
01
i0.62i
i
LLL
�a
(73)
G�iaPo
34'
34'
-LLT- STRUCTURE
-LLT- US 17-7¢76 OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK
-LLT-
Esif(ing 4T3,
Guardrail
Re"fu 1 1
EXIST EXIST EXIST
L----
STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION NO.2
BRIDGE NO.108
(MINIMUM DIMENSIONS)
STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION
BRIDGE NO.103
(MINIMUM DIMENSIONS)
c
sCwa oo(pmti6n
® Stantec
FNud 8013mefWU Nc
0 FZJ9n PoaE
maum
h.
Fade('' NC l )06
me
F .((919)81-7U
Fa.(a ..
x N..F m
Li��rse Na. F�
DESIGN DATA -LHED,
-LLT- & -LRT-
ADT 2914 =
79,625
ADT 2035 =
107,000
D =
55%
DRV =
R%
TTST =
3%
DUAL =
3%
V =
60 MPH
FUNC CLASS. - FREEWADEXP.
-LRT- STRUCTURE
-LRT- US 17-74-76 OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK
**ADDITIONAL BRIDGE OFFSET WIDTH
REQUIRED FOR STAGE CONSTRUCTION
-LRT-
n•
14' 12' 12'
12' 12' 10'
E
i
i
!
i
2i
STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION NO.3
BRIDGE NO.107
(MINIMUM DIMENSIONS)
NOTE:
STAGE CONSTRUCTION
(MAINTAIN TRAFFIC ON -SITE
WHILE REPLACING BRH)GE NO.107)