Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCDOT_89-13 Minor Mod Brunswick RiverPermit Class MODIFICATION/MINOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environment and Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission Vermt"t for X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant to NCGS 113A-118 X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229 Permit Number 89-13 Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 Authorizing development in Brunswick County at the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek on US 17-74-76 / NC 133 as requested in the permittee's applieaden letters dated 5/21/14 and revised letter dated 6/26/14, including the attached drawings as referenced in Condition No 3 of this permit This permit, issued on 7/22/14 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consisten with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terns ma3 be subject to tines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void. Modification of Bridue Design and In -Work Moratoria (TIP No. R-3601) 1) This minor modification of CAMA Permit No. 89-13 authorizes a revision to the bridge designs to allow fewer columns that are larger in diameter, deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick Bridge No. 108, a modification of the in -water work moratoria, placement of fill adjacent to Alligator Creek, and additional impacts from utility line work. 2) All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless specifically altered herein. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or continuance as the case may be. C This permit must be accessible on -site to Department personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunder requires further Division approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on No Expiration Date, pursuant to GS 136-44.7B In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. I Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. 70,'z-- Braxton C. Davis, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted. Signature ofPermittee N.C. Department of Transportation TIP No. R-3601 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Permit # 89-13 Page 2 of 2 3) Unless specifically altered herein, all work authorized by this permit modification shall be carried out in accordance with the following fifty nine (59) workplan drawings: '/2 size drawings: Thirty-one (31) drawings dated 5/8/2014, five (5) dated 5/20/14, two (2) dated 6/25/2014, four (4) dated 6/9/2014, thirteen (13) dated 6/10/2014, three (3) dated 6/11/2014, and one (1) dated as received on 5/22/14. 4) The permittee shall adhere to an in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River from January 1 st through September 30th and in Alligator Creek from January 1st through June 30th, of any year. During the moratoria, in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using the screwing in method. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval from the NC Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies. 5) This minor modification shall be attached to the original of Permit No. 89-13, which was originally issued on 8/2/13, as well as all subsequent modifications and/or refinements, and copies of all documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance. NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or authorizations that may be required. NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Jahn E. Skvarla, III Governor Secretary July 14, 2014 Brunswick County NCDWQ Project No. 13-0472v.4 Widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133 TIP Project No. R-3601 MODIFICATION to APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS. Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598 Dear Mr. Hancock: You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts associated with the widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133 from NC 133 (River Road)/SR 1472(Village Road) Interchange to the US 421 /NC 133 Interchange in Brunswick County: Revised Stream Impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin Site Station Permanent Temporary Permanent 'Temporary Total Stream Fill in Fill in Fill in Fill in Stream Impactd Intermittent Intermittent Perennial Perennial Impact Requir Stream Stream Stream Stream (linear ft) Mitigat linear ft linear it)linear it)linear it)linear 1 -Y2-13+05 0 0 47 10 57 0 l3 -Y- 34+98 to 36+55 58* 37 0 0 95 0 TOTAL 58* 37 47 10 152 0 Total Revised Stream Impact for Project: 152 linear feet. *includes 14 If of bank stabilization Revised Wetland Impacts in the Cane Fear River Basin (rivarian) Site Station Fill (ac) Fill (temporary) ac Excavation (temporary) ac Mechanized Clearing ac Hand Clearing ac Total Wetland Impact ac 2 -LMED- 54+37 to 54+75 RT <0.01 0 <0.01 0 0.02 0.03 3 64+43 LT & -LMED- 65+92 to 66+26 LT 0.03 0 <0.01 0 0.04 0.07 4 76+31 LT & -LMED- 74+99 to 75+19 RT 1 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 0 0.16 0.21 Transportation and Permit ing Unit 1617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-807-63001 FAX 919-733-1290 Internet �.ncxatemualiN.om e NCarolina oNaturally An Equal OpporLunny 1 Afiniabve Action Empbyer Fill 5 -LMED- 83+00 to 83+21 RT 0 <0.01 <0.01 0 0 0.01 6 -LRT- 85+81 to 87+69 RT 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 7 -LLT- 90+25 to 90+74 LT & -LLT- 94+00 to 94+21 LT 0 <0.01 <0.01 0 <0.01 0.01 8 -LLT- 99+60 to 99+97 LT <0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 9 -LRT- 101+06 to 101+17 RT 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 10 -LLT-111+79 to 113+14 RT LRT- 112+37 to 114+59 0.14 0.03 0 0 0.10 0.27 11 -LRT- 115+52 to 115+61 RT LRT- 121+21 to 121+77 RT 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.03 12 -Y2- 20+65 0.16 0 0 0.04 0 0.20 14 -Y- 38+30 RT 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 EC measures in HC areas 0 0.04 0 0 0 0.04 UTILITIES* U 1 73+52 to 73+94. 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 U2 79+32 to 79+73 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U3 84+95 to 85+05 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U4 90+64 to 93+31 <0.01 0 0 0 <0.01 0.01 U5 95+69 to 95+64 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U6 100+59 to 101+50 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U7 107+05 to 107+47 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U8 114+93 to 115+07 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 U9 115+21 to 115+66 <0.01 0 0 0 0 <0.01 U10 121+04to 121+18 0 0 0 0 <0.01 <0.01 TOTAL** 0.37 0.08 1 0.02 0.04 0.41 0.92 Total Revised Wetland Impact for Project: 0.92 acres. *after -the -fact authorization - these sites were not included in the original authorization request and discovered after impacts had occurred. **totals may not match sum of individual impacts due to rounding. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received May 21, 2014 and revisions received on June 26, 2014. After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3891 and 3884. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 23 and Nationwide Permit 12 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit. This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should your project change, you must notify the NCDWR and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the -attached certification(s) and any additional conditions_listed below. Condition(s) of Certification: Project Specific Conditions 1. All of the authorized activities and written conditions of the certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated May 15, 2013 still apply except where superseded by this certification. 2. The permittee will need to adhere to all appropriate in -water work moratoria (including the use of pile driving or vibration techniques) as prescribed by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Marine Fisheries and National Marine Fisheries. The in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River extends from January 1" through September 30th and in Alligator Creek from January I' through June 30'", of any year. During the moratoria in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using screwing methodology. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval from the NC Division of Water Resources and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission. In addition, the permittee shall conform to the NCDOT policy entitled "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997) at all times. 3. As a condition of this 401 Water Quality Certification, the bridge demolition and construction must be accomplished in strict compliance with the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities. 4. For the 47 linear feet of streams being impacted due to site dewatering activities, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and revegetated with appropriate native species. 5. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the NCDOT's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) Stormwater Permit NCS000250, including the applicable requirements of the NCGO1000. 6. Please be aware that by having impacted wetlands not covered under the original 401 Water Quality. Certification issued to this project without first applying for and securing a modification of the certification, you have violated Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2H .0500. Title 15A NCAC 2H .0500 requires certifications pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a discharge into navigable waters, including wetlands, as described in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 323. It also states any person desiring issuance or modification of the State certification or coverage under a general certification required by Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall file with the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative.hearings. You must file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is: Office of Administrative Hearings 6714 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Telephone: (919)-431-3000, Facsimile: (919)-431-3100 A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows: _ Mr. Lacy Presnell, General Counsel Department of Environment and Natural Resources I601 Mail Service Center I k This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact Mason Hemdon at (910) 3084021 or mason.hemdon@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Thomas A. Reeder, Director ` Division of Water Resources ec: Brad Shaver, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office Stoney Mathis, Division 3 Environmental Officer Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Environmental Protection Agency Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission Amy James, NCDOT NES Steve Sollod, NC Coastal Management Steven Lane, NC Coastal Management Sonia Carrillo, NCDWQ Central Office File Copy SAW-2007-03641-010 - -- - - - - U.S. ARMY- CORPS OF ENGINEERS-- - -- - -- - WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SAW-2007-03641-010 County: Brunswick U.S.G.S. Quad: Wilmington GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Permittee: NC DOT Agent: NC DOT Attn: Mr. Richard Hancock. P.E. attn: Ms. Amy James Address: Manager, PDEA PDEA-Natural Environment Section 1598 Mail Service Center 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 Raleigh, NC 27699 Size (miles) 2+ Nearest Town Leland Nearest Waterway Brunswick River/Alligator Creek River Basin Cape Fear USGS HUC 03030005 Coordinates Latitude: 34.2344 Longitude:-77.9795 Location description: The project area is along US 17/74/76 from the NC 133/SR 1472 interchange to the U Description of projects area and activity: The NCDOT propose to widen the aforementioned stretch of road from four to six lanes which also involves the replacement of bridges over the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek. Additionally. the northbound brifte will be the start of an additional seventh lane that will continue on US 17 into Wilmington. The project as proposed would result in the permanent loss of 0.38 acres of non tidal wetlands, 0.03 acres of tidal wetlands. and 105 linear feet of intermittent stream. This verification additionally covers after the fact impacts for directional bore utilities already installed. The utility impacts total <0.01 of an acre of wetland fill and 0.03 of an acre of hand clearing. Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ® Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 23 and NW 12. SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and .your submitted application, modified Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 12 request dated June 26, 2014. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action. This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone 919-807-6300) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808. This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910.251-4611 or Brad.E.Shaver(a),usace.army.mil. Determination of Jurisdiction: A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the jaw or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water ;act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. D. ® Thejurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference jurisdictional determination issued 10/6/2008 and 2/24/2010. Action 1D: SAW-2007 3641. Basis For Determination: The subject area exhibited both an ordinary high water and had characteristics of wetlands as described in the 1987 Corps Delineation Manual and both resources are abutting or drain to the Cape Fear River, Brunswick River, or Alligator Creek, all of which are traditionally navigable water bodies that are subject to the ebb and flood of tides. Remarks: See special conditions. SHAVER.BRAD.EaE°°- ^u °N«ter° Corps Regulatory Official:1276601756 Date: 7/14/2014 Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2017 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at littp:/1pert.nwp.usace.armv.mil/survey.btntl . Copy furnished (electronic): NCDENR-DWR, Mr. Mason Herndon NCDOT-NES, Mr. Chris Rivenbark NC WRC, Mr. Travis Wilson NCDENR-DCM, Mr. Stephen Lane NCDENR-DCM, Mr Steve Sollod NCDOT-Div 3, Mr. Stonewall Mathis NCDOT-Div 3, Mr. Jackson Provost USACE, Mr. Todd Tugwell NCEEP. Ms. Beth Harmon saw-2067-0364 10 — SPECIAL CONDITIONS R-3601 Proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC 133 from NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange, Brunswick County COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS 1. All work must be performed in strict compliance with the plans attached to the NCDOT letters dated May 21, 2014 and undated June 26, 2014, which are authorized by this permit. Any modification to the authorized permit plans must be approved by the USACE prior to implementation. COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS 2. Failure to institute and carry out the details of the following special conditions, below, will result in a directive to cease all ongoing and permitted work within waters and/or wetlands associated with the permitted project, or such other remedies and/or fines as the District Engineer or his authorized representatives may seek. CONSTRUCTION PLANS 3. The permittee will ensure that the construction design plans for this project do not deviate from the authorized permit plans. Any deviation in the construction design plans will be brought to the attention of the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office prior to any active construction in waters or wetlands. 4. All activities described in the plans as temporary must be restored to their pre project conditions before completion of the project. PROTECTED RESOURCES 5. The NCDOT must use the United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service's GUIDELINES FOR AVOIDING IMPACTS TO THE WEST INDIAN MANATTEE: Precautinary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters (attached). 6. The NCDOT must adhere to an inwater work moratorium for the Brunswick River between the periods of Jan 1 — Sept 30 and for Alligator Creek during Jan 1 — June 30 of any year during the construction period. During the moratoria in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using screwing methodology. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval from the Resource Agencies through Corps coordination. CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE 7. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and conditions of this pennit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this project with a copy of this permit, and any authorized modifications. A copy of this permit including the authorized plans referenced in Special Condition (1) and authorized modifications, including all conditions, shall be available at the project site during constriction and maintenance of this project. ACTIVITIES NOT AUTHORIZED 8. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this permit, no excavation, fill, or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands, or shall any activities take place that cause the degradation of waters or wetlands. In addition, except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this project, in such a manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns within, into, or out of waters or wetlands or to reduce the reach of waters or wetlands. This permit does not authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material or construction equipment within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area. BORROW AND WASTE 9. To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on high ground and do not result in the degradation of adjacent wetlands and streams, except as authorized by this permit, the permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to identify all areas to be used to borrow material, or to dispose of dredged, fill, or waste material. The pennittee shall provide the USACE with appropriate maps indicating the locations of proposed borrow or waste sites as soon as the permittee has that information. The permittee will coordinate with the USACE before approving any borrow or waste sites that are within 400 feet of any streams or wetlands. All jurisdictional wetland lines on borrow and waste sites shall be verified by the Corps of Engineers and shown on the approved reclamation plans. The permittee shall ensure that all such areas comply with the preceding condition of this permit, and shall require and maintain documentation of the location and characteristics of all borrow and disposal sites associated with this project. This information will include data regarding soils, vegetation and hydrology sufficient to clearly demonstrate compliance with the preceding condition. All information will be available to the USACE upon request. NCDOT shall require its contractors to complete and execute reclamation plans for each waste and borrow site and provide written documentation that the reclamation plans have been implemented and all work is completed. This documentation will be provided to the Corps of Engineers within 30 days of the completion of the reclamation work. REPORTING OF VIOLATIONS 10. The permittee will report any violation of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act in writing to the Wilmington District, U. S Army Corps of Engineers, within 24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation. SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 11. All fill material must be adequately stabilized at the earliest practicable date to prevent sediment from entering into adjacent waters or wetlands. The permittee shall remove all sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters, and shall restore natural grades in those areas; prior to project completion. 12. Any directional bores proposed near or around jurisdictional features must take all necessary precautions to avoid any slurry or frac out incidents from entering jurisdictional areas. These precautions should include the use of vac trucks where appropriate and secondary containment around the entry and exit pits. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION 13. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization. SHAVER.BRAD. HAWRBRA ER]5601]56 DN:I.S, .-US. G.y,bi nt ou=DaD, m= E.1276601756SHAVEPB`AMB50..II RADE]560U55 MW 2014.07.141&18:O5 L4b0' r NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor 1iMAYM0335FFI 1/l3rl TO: Doug Huggett FROM: Stephen Lane John E. Skvarla, III Secretary SUBJECT: Comments & Recommendations — Minor Modification for CAMA Permit No. 89-13 NCDOT- Widening of US 17-74-76/NC 133, (TIP No. R-3601) Brunswick County DATE: July 15, 2014 The following are my comments and recommendations regarding the above mentioned permit modification request. The request is to revise the bridge designs to allow fewer columns that are larger in diameter and to allow deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick Bridge 108. Additionally the applicant requests to modify the in -water work moratoria, revise utility impacts, and place surcharge on the east bank of Alligator Creek for the approaches to Bridges 107 and 108. Based upon my review I have no objection to the issuance of this permit modification but offer the following conditions: 1 This minor modification of CAMA Permit No. 89-13 authorizes a revision to the bridge designs to allow fewer columns that are larger in diameter, deck drains over surface waters on Brunswick Bridge 108, a modification of the in -water work moratoria, placement of surcharge adjacent to Alligator Creek, and additional impacts from utility line work and surcharge fill placement. This minor modification shall be attached to the original of Permit #89-13, which was originally issued on August 2, 2013 as well as all subsequent modifications and/or refinements, and copies of all documents must be readily available. on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance. The permittee must adhere to an in -water work moratorium in the Brunswick River from January 1st through September 30th and in Alligator:Creek from January 1st through June 30th, of any year. During the moratoria, in -water work is restricted to working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding of barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer and installation of casings using the screwing in method. No other in -water work activities are authorized during the moratoria without prior approval from the NC Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the appropriate resource agencies. Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 Phone: 252-808-2808 \ FAX: 252-247-3330 Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer NCDOT- Minor Modification Request, R-3601, Brunswick County Comments and Recommendations Page 2 1 4 All work authorized by this permit modification shall be carried out in accordance with the following attached workplan drawings: 1'.14rl�i�v '/2 size drawings: Thirty-seven datedS8/2014;�to (2) dated 6/25/2014, four (4) dated 6/9/2014, one (1) tieSVI1 2014, fear' ( utility drawmg�,ted 6/10/2014, three (3) utility drawings dated 6/11/2014, e x(� W-'� " 5 All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless specifically altered herein. 6 This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or authorizations that may be required. -FI rlI+ ''r.. G +fiL' `! G "I'rl ! ro pe4- yIrl 1 r,% -qj af-liq z��2�i 3013133,�� 1D� 3r /-7i rl�ll� Y3 P•s`! I P�I°IfTs2�,39 Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 Phone: 252-808-2808 \ FAX: 252-247-3330 Internet: www.ncooastalmanagement.net V An Equal Opportunity \ Affinafive Action Employer . A STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA E6VENIER sECRPT1 June 26, 2014 Wilmington Regulatory Field Office N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources US Army Corp. of Engineers Division of Coastal Management 69 Darlington Avenue 400 Commerce Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Morehead City, NC 28557 ATTN: Brad Shaver NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sirs': ATTN: Stephen Lane NCDOT Coordinator Subject: Revised Modification Request for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23, Section 10 Permit, CAMA Major Development Permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange, Brunswick County. Federal Aid Project No. NHS-0017(68); TIP No. R-3601. References: R-3601 404/401/CAMA permit application dated April 26, 2013 R-3601 Nationwide Permit 23 and 5,issue d August 19, 2013 (SAW-2007- 03461-010) R-3601 Major CAMA permit, issued August 2, 2013 (#89-13) R.-3601 401 Water Quality CeA iflsaaen, issued May 16, 2013 (TDALR4 I As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange by adding one auxiliary lane in each direction. The purpose of this letter is to update the recent modification request of the issued permits for this project to account for design changes and geotechnical conditions. Please find enclosed revised permit drawings (sheets 28, 29, 32, 34, 35, and 36), revised utility drawings, stormwater management plan, and wetland permit impact summary from the modification submittal with this revision request. Bridge 108 on southbound US 17 over Alligator Creek will be widened to provide a new traffic lane on the south side of the current alignment. Flat roadway grade line profiles required to meet existing bridge deck elevations on bridge 108 have led to concerns about r MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-707-6000 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX 919-212-5785 CENTURY CENTER BUILDING PROTECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMEMAL ANALYs6 WE5817E: IMNYY.NCDOT.OR JUN 3 O ZOI1 4 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DR. 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH,NC 2761D RALEIGH NC 27699�1548 D014dt9HD CITY potential ponding and accumulation of ice on the bridge deck along the south side barrier. To remedy this situation and improve safety, deck drains will be installed on the south side of the bridge at 6' intervals over a distance of 276 feet. While stormwater from new deck surfaces will be discharged directly to the waterway at Bridge 108, all of the surface drainage at Bridge 107 is to be removed and treated prior to discharge into Alligator Creek, for a net reduction of 3,860 sq. ft. of stormwater draining directly into the creek. Additional justification for deck can As you are aware, there has been utility activity in jurisdictional areas that was not included in our permit. Therefore, NCDOT is requesting an additional <0.01 of permanent wetland fill for the relocation of an Earthlink line and addition of utility boxes. There has also been a change in the profile of a directional bore of an AT&T underground phone line (no additional impacts), which is reflected on the permit drawings. Lastly, geotechnical studies have revealed the need for a surcharge on the east bank of the Alligator Creek for the roadway approach to Bridges 107 and 108. The surcharge involves placement of temporary fill for an interval of time to a specified height in order to consolidate existing underlying soils. The necessary height of the surcharge will lead to an increase in temporary fill in the wetlands between the east and west bound lanes until the surcharge soil is removed. The temporary impact area will replace an area originally designated for hand clearing. The result is an increase of temporary fill in wetland (from 0.01 acre to 0.04 acre total) and a reduction of hand clearing in wetland (from 0.41 acre to total of 0.38 acre). Regulatory Approvals CAMA: NCDOT is revising the recently submitted Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development permit modification request to account for the change in impacts as noted above. Section 404; NCDOT is revising die i mently submitted Nationwide 23 modification request to account for the change in impacts as noted above. Section 401: NCDOT is revising the recently submitted Water Quality Certification modification request to account for the change in impacts noted above. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will continue to be met. NCDOT is providing this revision letter to the NCDWR for their review and approval. A copy of the revised sheets will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: httl2s://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental!Pages/default.aspx under Quick Links > Permit Applications Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Amy James at aejames2@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6129. Sincerely, Richard Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List rTRECEIVEDN 30 ?r't James, Amy E From: Herndon, Mason Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:07 PM To: James, Amy E Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: RE: R-3601 bridge 108 Thanks Amyl At this point I would say that you have adequately justified the need for deck drains on the south side of 108 and we can proceed accordingly. MH Mason Herndon NCDENR, Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs mason. herndon(a)ncdenr.eov Phone: (910) 308-4021 E-mall correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties. From: James, Amy E Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:51 PM To: Herndon, Mason Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: R-3601 bridge 108 Hi Mason, In follow-up to your conversation with Chris yesterday, I checked with hydraulics concerning the location of deck drains on the existing bridge 108 and the possible use of sonar to determine low spots. Here is what I got from hydro: Deck drains currently exist against the north barrier only on bridge 108. You can see them on Google street view: https://www.google.com/maps/@34.234521: 77.969746.3a, 90y,34.29 h,35.49t/data=!3 m4! le 1! 3m2! lsDPH idrpG!Qsuxbfxl LrS3A!2eO There is a constant 2% cross slope from the existing south barrier to the north barrier that slopes toward the existing deck drains. The existing south barrier and shoulder will be cut off and replaced with the lane addition. The proposed lane addition to bridge 108 would have a 2.5% cross slope in the opposite direction (toward the south barrier), which is where we would like to put deck drains. The thing about surveying the bridge for low spots that makes it impractical, is that we wouldn't be able to do so until the lane addition to the bridge was finished and deck drains are formed in during construction. I also asked about moving the easternmost bent on bridge 107 10 feet in either direction, but have not yet received a response (it would have to come from our design -build team). When l getone I will forward it on! Thanks, Amy REC6NEU rn7XA4-MffD N 3 0 2014 CTY f James, Amy E From: James, Amy E Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:55 PM To: Herndon, Mason Cc: Rivenbark, Chris; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request Mason, I was going to save this for the cover letter in our forthcoming revised mod request, but decided that the answers were long and complicated enough that I'm going to forward them now, straight from our hydraulics unit (in italics): As for why the change in design now: The original NCDOT design from 2 or 3 years ago was Alternative 1, described below, without deck drains. At the time it was designed originally, FHWA design guidance indicated this was a viable solution. Since then, the project went to Design Build and is being revised and re -reviewed. NCDOT Hydraulics received spread calculations from the design build team on April25, 2014. Between the time of original design and the present time, instances of ponding on low slope (nearly flat) bridges have come to light which caused Hydraulics to provide a greater factor of safety and more redundancy when dealing with bridge deck spread. And to answer your other questions: 1) Are you capturing and discharging stormwater water from the roadway prior to it reaching the bridge and discharging through the deck drains?: Inlets are proposed on the roodwayjust off each end of the bridge to capture stormwater before it reaches the bridge. Only bridge deck water would be discharged through deck drains. ..1.. Ky`kn•eie.. A!Ai�Uf.MY__�iH �• ,✓'1 f—`. ,U N✓�TfGYt. } n -ZIT 2) What other options did DOT consider before adding open deck drains and why were they not determined to be adequate options?: Alternative 1: Provide no deck drains on the widened section. This alternative would have water draining from the crown of the bridge deck across the new widened section toward the south bridge barrier (see light -blue arrows). Water would need to pond against the new bridge barrier and up into the lane until it pooled high enough to runoff the ends of the bridge. This bridge is flat from end to end, so there is no prevailing slope along the bridge barrier to cause water to flow toward one end where it could be collected in an inlet. Alternative 1 could be on academic solution that worked on paper. However, in practice this alternative is not feasible for three reasons. 1) Abridge such as 108 that is nominally 'flat" has imperfections in the deck that result in low areas where water will pond against the barrier, across the shoulder, and into the lane. 2) It is common for bridges to collect debris such as sand and clumps of grass as high as 6 inches against the bridge barrier that will act as miniature dams that will also trap water and cause ponding. 3) Historically, NCDOT hos not constructed bridges without an affirmative means of providing deck drainage, whether it is through deck drains or a prevailing slope to cause water to flow off the ends. Our responsibility to the public requires we provide a well thought out drainage solution with built in redundancy that will function in spite of deck imperfections, debris accumulation, or other unforeseen problems. Providing no deck drains is a solution that requires conditions that ore too delicate to be reliable over the long term. Alternative 2: Provide a variable cross slope on the new lane. This option was proposed by the design build team. This design wouldcreate a 'false crest" in the middle of the bridge at the 1%cross slope location which would cause water to flow east and west toward the ends of the bridge, where cross slope was gradually increased to 2.5%. The false crest would cause a slope along the bridge barrier of 0.18%falling toward each end of the bridge, which is below NCDOT's minimum gutter slope of 0.3% considered constructible and adequate to induce water to flow reliably. Like Alternative 1, Alternative 2 could bean academic solution that worked on paper. However, in practice Alternative 2 is not feasible for reasons land 2 cited for Alternative 1. Ultimately, this solution requires conditions that are too delicate to be reliable over the long term. Furthermore, the area of 1% cross slope in the middle of the bridge is not steep enough to cause water to move across the lone toward the bridge barrier quickly enough to prevent ponding. Said another way, the water depth as it sheet flowed across the 1%section would be deep enough to cause hydroplaning. Additionally, we cannot steepen the cross slope enough to create adequate slope along the barrier rail due to constraints preventing lowering the low chord, bridge structural design constraints, and roadway design criteria governing maximum cross slope on a straight section of road. «. u. Yltfl R4 +'+M. fNy 4.15`q l4q if Ma»cW aanp➢aMp� DYMr .cif n'Wlbbw. Q3�ib Eb llkAHn,M xME df Alternative 3: Closed drainage system. This bridge is very close to the water surface. Notice the dark high tide line on the piling cap in the picture below. A closed drainage system would be submerged during high tide, and would be subject to damage from the tidal flow. It would also decrease clearance under the bridge. RECEIVED JUN 3 0 2014 DCMMADMY Alternative 4: Provide additional width on the shoulder to accommodate ponding. The new widened section could be made slightly wider before it was limited by the constraint of not lowering the low chord. The additional width would provide additional ponding area. However, spread on a nominally 'flat" bridge is unpredictable for the reasons cited in Alternative 1 (deck imperfections and debris). If we could reliably predict the spread (as on a non flat bridge) this would be a viable alternative. (Non flat bridges are also somewhat "self cleaning" of debris and tend not to accumulate sand and grass clumps as readily as flat bridges.) Since deck imperfections and debris make spread width unpredictable, we would not know whether a widened shoulder would be adequate to contain the spread. 3) Is it possible just to have deck drains over the rip rap end bent protection in combination with a little additional widening?: If the bridge were not flat, this could be a viable alternative. However, with debris and deck imperfections as noted above, we cannot predict where spread will occur. If by chance, the spread occurred over the banks where the drains were located, this would work. If it occurred in a pocket in the middle of the bridge due to a low spot in the deck or debris accumulation, there would be no means to convey the water to the deck drains on the ends of the bridge. Please let me know if you still have questions and/or if this is still not sufficient justification for deck drains on bridge 108. Thanks, From: Herndon, Mason Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 3:19 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request Amy, I'm still a little confused on why this change is just coming this late in the process. I understand working with existing grades makes stormwater management more challenging and that safety is a top priority. However, I would like to have the following additional information? • Are you capturing and discharging stormwater water from the roadway prior to it reaching the bridge and discharging through the deck drains? • What other options did DOT consider before adding open deck drains and why were they not determined to be adequate options? For example closed drainage system, widening the bridge a little more tgaccommodatethe spread and ponding concerns and etc. • Is it possible just to have deck drains over the rip rap end bent protection in combination with a little additional widening? • A I just feel like there is someway that DOT can abide by their prior commitment of not adding additional direct stormwater discharge into surface waters. Thanks! MH Mason Herndon NCDENR, Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs mason.herndon@ncdenr.gov Phone:(910) 308-4021 E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties. From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:32 PM To: Herndon, Mason; brad.e.shaverausace.army mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request Mason, This is what we have in the draft revised mod request about the justification for new deck drains on bridge 108: "Flat roadway grade line profiles required to meet existing bridge deck elevations have led to concerns about potential ponding and accumulation of ice on the bridge deck along the south side barrier. To remedy this situation and improve safety, deck drains will be installed on the south side of the bridge at 12' intervals over a distance of 276 feet." Is that enough justification, or would we need more? Thanks, Amy From: Herndon, Mason Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:04 PM To: James, Amy E; brad. e.shaventijusace.army.mil; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: RE: R-3601 revised mod request Amy, The SMP that was presented at 4C and submitted in the original application stated that there would be "no additional surface water discharged to the deck drains on existing Bridge No. 108 over Alligator Creek." The 4B meeting minutes state that water will be intercepted and no additional water will added to the existing deck drains on the north side of the bridge that will be retained. It also states that there will be no deck drains on the new portion of the bridge to the south. Are you advising us that the revised application will be adding decks drains on the new portion of the bridge? If this is correct, will they discharge directly into the surface waters of Alligator Creek? If my assumptions are correct, we will need a very strong explanation of why this change in commitment is required before we can approve the modification request. It is not DWR's policy,to approve direct stormwater discharge into surface waters. It would be very helpful if you could provide some additional information regarding this change. Thanks! MH JUN 3 0 2014 DCd1MHDCITY Mason Herndon NCDENR, Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs m ason. herndon@ncdenr.eov Phone: (910) 308-4021 E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 1:02 PM To: brad.e.shaverausace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen; Sollod, Steve Cc: Rivenbark, Chris Subject: R-3601 revised mod request Hello everyone, You should be seeing a revised mod request for R-3601 in the next week or so (with revised utility drawings, to account for the unauthorized Earthlink work) and the design -build team wanted me to just give you a heads up that this revision will include adding deck drains to bridge 108 to rectify safety concerns our hydraulic unit is having with the proposed system. We are still removing deck drains from bridge 107 (the bridge being totally replaced) and in fact there will still be a net loss of direct drainage into Alligator Creek even with the deck drains on bridge 108. If you have any concerns about this change that you feel will possibly result in the non -issuance of the mod, please let me know as soon as possible. Thanks, Amy Amy James Biologist, Project Management NCDOT Natural Environment Section Direct 919.707-6129 aeiamesPncdot.aov Email correspondence to and from ins sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Low and may be disclosed to Gird parties. r I ijntnvaV North Carolina Department of Transportation S[OrlSriwat�l• Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 1.2; Released September 2(111) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Pro ect/TIP No.: R-3601 Coun les : 3runsw,ck New Hanover Page 1 of 1 General Project Information Project No.: R-3601 Project Type: Roadway Widening Date 6I9/2014 NCDOT Contact: Karen McCauley, PE Contractor I Desi ner: lJoselart Kelvin on, PE Address: Transportation Program - Mngt Unit NCDOT Address: R-3601 Project Design Manager 1020 Birch Ridge Drive 801 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 300 Ralei h, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: 919-707-6611 Phone: 919-865-7390 Email: kmccauley@ncdot.gov Email: joss h.kelvin on stanlec.com CI crown: Belville and Leland Coun des : Brunswick New Hanov River Basin(s): !Cape Fear CAMA County? Yes Yes Primary Receiving Water: I Brunswick River NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 18-77 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water rime . Class SC Supplemental: None ' Other Stream Classification: None 303 d Impairments: I dissolved oxvqen DO H Buffer Rules in Effect N/A ea Project Dcri lion Project Length lin. Miles or feet): 1.67 Mi. Surroundin Land Use: rural, tidally influenced Coastal Proposed Project Existing S te Project Buift-U on Area ac. ac. SIC. Typical Cross Section Description: 6 lane divided highway, 10 It paved houlders ItIrt, 6 it paved shoulders median; 4lane divided highway, approximately 10 it Devi shoulders rtltt, 3 ft paved shoulders grassed median, varying width median;gmssed median varying width Average Daily Traffic (vehlladday): Design/Future: ADT 2035=107 000 Existing: ADT 2 09=63,000 General Project Narrative: Minimizing use of shoulder berm gu ter and maintaining grass shoulder sheet flow along the causeway to the maximum extent practical. Eliminating deck drains on Bridge 103 over the Brunswick River and Bridg 107 over Alligator Creek. At Bridge 108 existing deck drains will be retained on the left side and neN deck drains will be added to the widened lane on the right side. Bi ' ge 108 and 107 existing deck area with deck drains = 18.230 sq ft. Proposed bridge 108 and 107 deck area with deck drains = 14.740 sq ft. O U N O C�7 M e� Z U References R� FW SKEET NO �AYStantec FG NGINEEERXGN ENGIN Efs DENOTES FILL IN ED, ® WETLAND toS. I.a^ �^^.. Fw^R. INCO, PLANS P SWb YO i IV. le• A /t .LLWnM FRkMEl. 27605 TM. 1916) 116E,N ® DENOTES HAND 02 FFax19192001 7ON CLEARING lj N— W, Fes,: z= Q PERMIT DRAWING FLEET-3$--6F 4A- S TE 10 6/25/2014 •ti/ 4 • a oIM1El Ee u. 0`-, . • • , • ,C uN.r 6 MRO GE i • • • < s _ SEf IOC ONS I GS f r•Jy�-.f' �. 4 ! G21C A IOCAiloa. ER T -_ Y' -109 20 T L� -3C 2i • • • '!:. . LT- IO 69 f0 10..9N ii. OF;.. • • 4 O p J _M - w'>V J ( �� LLi-I10 1610 110 i is 1 • 't- , f • \ 110.4 RE, ` • O , .ems • • \, , EMP. WORK BRIDGE u'- 60 -- U-----'--'--�--•---------.--•~---_ _ L r^m'='�'=t--_ �=•=�-__ i �----'--�-- - -L- --- w - - w ---- L 2 f O \ N � E. IF ,f f F f F C _._T__—.-...._._—__. _-- - _. .--- ..__.__—._.-_.... W N O s RCfJn O _F F Q v\FILL ~ rT > G6 Q Q g • 1 I '- iN Y✓ETLAND WATER c1.Ev.L73' 1 f hND CLEARRJG'� \ Q UY2/69 9d5 kH l , 1 1*#L WATER i /FILL IITLAN '' N C EtEv. 6f9' j \ F"' ten— I `F J 9 tY Z AI fno OF sJOCR M alli-113.15 RS �,�r'` \ =f , • • • • ' • 1 • J • �\\ T. v�"`, ! /i i FILI" IN WETLANLI f / �./ • • ,'vil / HAND CLEARING = • • f .•.� SXWLOEa �TRR • � • �j • ` F / j ! . • • • , ' ;Ri_,pq.21RTTT111Gz_ _.; .`,If ,;_ SITE_ 10 = � l 4 A 9 q 7nl4 _ _ +, JI I I • = TEMP. WORK BRIDGE / _ ' _ _ _ n�R T • • ,, REFERENCE: FOR -UT- & -LRT - PROFILE VIEW. SEE SHEETS 19-20 x _.: _r8.601-u[Ia xflL.-DSb_s49.dm CW25/20-L4 f Stantec ROADWAYGm NE«GINEfNs ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND EE... o0 mnii�:: zo.a�� ` \A SUHR .NCO w?nt P=cwrAFlNaxs p. I Rude 9W /• xc Fox. ® DENOTES HAND {� TO (9191W18 (91 17U F.,(9,9)BS,.,o2. CLEARING I Mesas xn. FL 72 Q Z l. PERMIT DRAWING = 1 _ _' SHEET 29 OF 44 = 6/25/2014 3 _ , ' _ _ ♦ = =xoxi:.� :.w%Ia9I.+ sv.0l:Ixa = — ti. , ♦ ebc penwNC., ♦.� TEMP. WORK BRIDGE w --t , ________ __________ _3________ ___ 3.. i ____ _____ _____ __.__ --c __ __ __ __ _l 4 —Z w `♦♦� _ F... F F F F F c _ =_�_� �— -- to W _ _ w N w ... ... — F F F - F: - - v 1 EMPADRA41 FILL 4N_ N/ETLAND x =` Fa- 11 : ( HAND CLCAR ITfG+� \' F V) E _ - FILL IN 1J✓ETIAND _ , J FH r �.}� F � � _______—__a____ _ __ _ -- — — — — — F = t 3 t / '3 3 = 3 t = = 1 1+ 1 ..._..—C H M...H.. Rk \ f o = _ = t = TEMP_ WORK BRIDGE u a J v H E+ 1 > 1 = = 3 k FILI` IN WETLAND. 1 1 t t HAND CLEARING' _ I SITE 10 l / 3 = 3aiECE4TD J y, _ ` AN 30 2014, 3 REFERENCE: 1/" FOR -LLT- & -LRT- PROFILt VIEW. SEE SHEETS 19-20 r3601_prm_wet_psh_s09.dgn 6/25/2014 12:17:30 Stantec R-360f 1 10 RM' S„EETNO. ROADWAY OELGN NYGP Ucs 5lanbc LcnflMylg SeMon lrc. ENGINEER ENGINEER W 1 Janes F.nWRI RaA Suite JW RWm"'NC'T INCOMPLE E PLANS Ln Te1.(919)EE1-E.955 pp XM u¢ ncOuulTroN Fy (919)951-t0]0 nwv.s1anlec. tan UiG Se N¢F-072 ) z Q � Y Y z 4 k R�JIE 4 Q1 Z 1 4 ' Y ' ' PERMIT DRAWING -SHEET , 4 , NY•Vh , 35 of44 4 Y , 4 6/9/2014 k Y i k Y z k - . — ` F yY -- F 136E E E O - HAND CLEARING-- ` \\_ F � TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND- -' FILL IN WETLANq.� _ --- _ 441 --- HAND CLEARING HAND CLEARING �k f 1,T HAND CLEARING 4 f S K Y A HAND CLEARING JUN 3 0 2014 vYl€ i 1 �\ 4 DCM-MADCITY C ITC 11 SITE 10 3C: DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES HAND CLEARING ® Stantec Slams[ CmauhN SeMaa Inc. 801 Jann F2nk Road SNhm Ryagh NC 27K T.1 (9;i as,-08fi5 F¢ (919) 85" M a—d"aMec.mn ( U.Ida, W FMi] 1 NO. IINCOMPLETE PLANS ro xm w aax f x romarwx i PERMIT WING )F 44 t F F — _ 1 F L S ' In -or y 0 ` HAND CLEARING __- C TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND. — — —" �--- - - ----�\ FILL IN WETLAND, -- f J U F, Y HAND CLEARING , i HAND CLEARIN6�, - -� F r i i i # �d Y HAND CLEARING HAND CLEARING y i s ly � 1 i 1 I * i SITE 11 ` i # QQ v RECEWED JU N 3 0 2014 4ACM-MftD CITY 1 DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND ® DENOTES HAND CLEARING 1601 -aoe n a10.OgnE 141 ITE 1 ITE 1 ..... .. .... .... ..... ..... r3641_ rdy_xpl_LRT 32.dgn_6/2/20.1.4 12:46;1 112+50.00 TEMPORARY FILL fo_:._.....:........:._....:_...:------ ..:........ :......:..:......_.;........;......_:..._ ..... m.. ........:...._..:........°.........:...._...:........;_..... N�'7 --——--- - ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... .... — ...._.. _ _.... ..... ..... ..... ..... .._. ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ...... sz�, —Lt. 1S0 140 130 120 lio 100 9A 90 70 4o 4p $0 20 10 011) zo 30 4D Sp 4t7%1 9.0 loo 110 120 130 140 150 - -- _ r3601_rdyxpl_LLT_34.dgn 6/2/2014 12:44:04 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY Site Station Structure CAMA Permanent 404 Permanent F411 In Temp. F 11 In Excavation 4 n Temp Excavation Mechanized an Clearing in Permanent SW Temp. SW Existing Channel Impacts Existing Channel Impacts Natural Stream No. (Fromlro) Size / Type Wetlands (ac) Wetlands (ac) Wetlands (ac) Wetlands (ac) Wetlands (ac) in Wetlands (ac) Wetlands (ac) impacts (ac) impacts (ac) Permanent (ft) Temp. (ft) Design (ft) 1 -Y2- 13+05 48" DRAINAGE PIPE 0.01 < 0.01 47 10 2 -LMED- 54+37 TO 54+75 RT 24" DRAINAGE PIPE < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 3 64+43 LT &'LMED 65+92 TO 66+26 LT BRIDGE 24" DRAINAGE PIPE 0.03 < 0.01 1 < 0.01 1 0.04 4 76+31 LT & -LMED- 74+99 TO 75+19 RT ROADWAY FILL/36" DRAINAGE PIPE 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.16 5 -LMED- 83+00 TO 83+21 RT EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE <0.01 <0.01 6 -LRT-85+81 TO 87+69 RT ROADWAY 0.01 7 -LLT-90+25 TO 90+74 LT & -LLT- 94+00 TO 94+21 LT ROADWAY < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 8 -LLT- 99+60 TO 99+97 LT 30" DRAINAGE PIPE < 0.01 0.01 9 -LRT- 101+06 TO 101+17RT EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE <0.01 10 -LLT- 111+79 TO 113+14 RT & -LRT- 112+37 TO 114+59 BRIDGE 108 & BRIDGE 107 0.14 0.03 0.10 11 -LRT- 115+52 TO 118+61 RT & -LRT- 121+21 TO 121+77 RT ROADWAY 0.03 ROADWAY/36" + + < 0401 44 13 -Y- 36+10 LT BANK STABILIZATION < 0.01 14 14 -Y- 38+30 RT ROADWAY I < 0.01 TOTALS': 0.03 10.34 0,04 0.02 0.04 0.38 0.03 1 <0.01 105 47 0.00 `Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 1. Permanent bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.G4 acres 2. Temporary bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.02 acres 3. There will be 0.38 acre of hand clearing on this project. Additionally, there will be 0.04 acre of temporary fill in wetlands for erosion control measures in hand clearing areas. There will also be a <0.01 acre (165 sq. ft.) of temporary fill in CAMA wetlands for erosion control measures in hand Gearing areas. 2013 ION NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R-3601 6/17/2014 BRUNSWICK AND NEW HANOVER COUNTY US 17-74-76 FROM NC 133/SR 1472 INTERCHANGE TO US 421 / NC 133 INTERCHANGE EET 44 OF 44 rJu RECEIVED N 3 0 2014 DCAf-liHD CITY WETLAND PERMIT IN WETLAND IMPACTS PACT SUMMARY SURFACE WATER Site . No. Station (From/To) Structure Size / Type Permanent Fill In Wetlands ac Temp, Fill In Wetlands ac Excavation in Wetlands ac Mechanized Clearing in Wetlands ac He Clea in Wetlands a Ing Permanent SW impacts ac Temp. SW impacts ac Existing Channel Impacts Permanent ft Existing Channel Impacts Temp. ft Natural Stream Design ft 1 73+52 TO 73+94 U/G Tel & CATV lines I 0. 1 2 79+32 TO 79+73 U/G Tel & CAN lines I <0 1 3 84+95 TO 85+05 U/G Tel & CAN lines <0, 1 4 93+31 TO 90+64 U/G Tel & CAN lines <.01 <0. 1 5 95+69 TO 95+94 U/G Tel &CAN lines <0 1 6 100+59 TO 101+50 1 U/G Tel & CATV lines <0. 1 7 107+05 to 107+47 U/G Tel & CAN lines <0. 1 8 114+93to115+07 U/GTel&CANlines <0. 1 9 15+1T01115+66 U/GTel&CANlines <0.01 10121+24to21+18 U/GTel&CANlines <0. 1 TOTALS: 70.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 3 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RMseE YAMS NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BRUNSWICK AND NEW HANOVER COUNTII TIP PROJECT (R-3601) Utility Permit Drawing Sheet I-;k- of RECEIVED JUN 80 7014 DCM-mm Crff m STATE OF NORTH H[ CA O LINA aNa X. M. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 143l MO X NOo[)eURN 1 U UTILITY DRAWING PLANS4 I N ' y BE L4� y' 1]t Q BR U11 tS WICK AND z EW-- [NOy - Z`z3U1QTlE5 - 17 } LOCATION: US 17-74-76 FROM NC 133 / SR 1472 INTERCHANGE W m, Ro CT < P CT TO THE US 421 INC 133 INTERCHANGE O " TYPE OF WORK RELOCATE UTILITY LINES I � - txED- POT srA. 85+E0e3 BR = VICINITY MAP JLT- sr sTA. Z MAU AN -LRr- ST $TA, 85+8J.61 AN BRIDGE BEGIN TA. END 108 -UT- STA. ]OB+79.86 BRIDGE NO. 108 A mom -LMg0. STA. R3+93.50 (LT. LN) BRIDGg No BRIDGE NO.105 BI aacnv BRIDGE9 -LMED- STA.55+93.50 (LT.LN.) Off, 6 8 - a BEGIN Goxs2Rucrrox -Y- STA. I7+83.00 `u �- 5 � -LMELI us v-�¢ 6 nc 133 - - � =Y A L[p I -Y2- STA.Ii+ORM N / END CONSTROCTTON 1 � v - 7.41+ BEGIN CONSTRUC77ON -RPCY- STA.22+00.00 A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF LELAND AND BELVILLE. GRAPHIC SCALES so zs q so 1qo PLANS so 2s 4 so 1po PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 10 10 0 P OFILE VERTICAL) r INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SMWT 2 THUR 3A PROFILE SREETS 4 THRU 12 UTILTIY DRAWING SHEETS BRIDGE NO.103 (TO UTILITIES OWNER END TIP 1- AT&T 2- ME WARNER CABLE (TWC) 3- EARTXIJNR 4- MCNC 5- PROGRESS ENERGY (DISTRIBUTION) 6- ATMC 7- ARUNS07CK REGIONAL HZGO WATER AND SEWER T.LP. NO, SHEET NO. R-3601 1 REVISED 06/10/2014 til Utility Permit Drawing Sheet LOt_1--7-- 0- SR 1352 (RATTLESNJP JU14 3 Q 2014 I I DCM•M�D M INCOMPLETE PLAN W N V M R1W ACpY o PRELIMINARY PLAi pp Yp[ vss .v0. CYX.,'.I,CMN SEA1 PREPAAEU IN 1ffi OPPICd (W: DIVISION OF JUGRWAYS UTILITIES UNIT UTLLnZS ENGINEERING IJ➢I AI.JE SERVCES MT'ER R.JLSIJ.I( M JIe 10) 0 PEW (JO) Ml�" G T FAX fJK)1J0..RJI Rees WmJ,i wn PA 1771LDW SECTION ENGD.EM Cent/ BXX,PX.4 P.B. unU21ES SQUAD LEADER PROJECT ENG➢PEER K&EmnO UnLRIDS PRUJECT DESIGNER M1C REVISED 6/10/2014 PROPOSED U/G TEL. LINE PROFILE PRELIMINARY BORE DETAIL - PROFILE VIE` 1 BRIDGE E STIN I GROI NO - BRIDGS 9R I➢G'e �o o........ ...:.... ........ .. ........ .... ........ ... ,... ... ... .... ._ ... .. .... .... ... -o .. .. ,,. ., ... .., ... ,. .... .. ... .. .. ..,. ..�� as ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ...._.. ........ .-...... ...... ........ ......., ........ ........ ....... ._,. ... .... .....,.. ... .... .... ... .... ... ... .. .... .... ,. -n UB 0 I AD ...... ,PRG OSED U.{a:.. L ...� .GATV LTNE. .... ... ...... ... .... .: ....... .. _..... .. ...... ..... ...... a u' -ro ...... ....... .. ... ... .:.„ 1. ... .. ..... .. ... .. ..... :. .... ... ., s,: .. .... ... ......: ...... ..... ... ...... ..... :... .. ..: .. ... ...: .. .. . ..... .': .a-k 55^0 SI+OJ '_'� Sd.09 59�4C Stirc, SOUNDINGS OF THE BRUNSWICK RIVER WERE RECORDED AT BOTH BRIDGES, BUT WERE PERFORMED ON THE UPRIVER SIDE OF THE BRIDGES ONLY, ACTUAL DEPTH AT 60FT OFFSET FROM BRIDGE 15 UNKNOWN THEREFORE IT WILL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO RECORD DEPTH AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM 20FT BELOW EXISTING GRADE ACROSSRIVER, AND MAINTAIN A MINIMUM DEPTH OF LOFT BELOW SURFACE INSIDE DELINEATED WETLANDS. ow¢ woF ra- JRECEIVED UN 3 0 2014 n!'.M.-MHD CITY Utility Permit Drawing Sheet 2 ofJ ?-_ REVISED 6/10/2014 PROPOSED U/G TEL. LINE PROFILE PRELIMINARY BORE DETAIL - PROFILE VIEW .HG'Mft 1NCWfPLETE �a PREIAMINARI ... ......... ....... ......... ..... .... ...... ... ..... ................... ..... .... ..... ........... .......... .... ............ .... ... .... .... .... .... .. ......... BR OGE m d:..... .:.. ... ... ..... .. r. .....,. 4....... .:.. EXI TING ROUN �o :'....... ...... ... .. .... ........ .... .. ..... x:r:m ..... ........ ... o.. .. ..... ....... .:.... .... - .. ,r.. .... .... .... .... .,., ...� .,.. ., .... .... .... .,,. .., ,... ..,. .... .... .. ,... >o (1r:4 - S,� 3 GRA '� '. ... .. _:.. ....... .. .....:: ... ...... ... .... ........ ... .. .. .. . CAI ldA .. «i ° ..... ....: ... :.:. .. .......: .... ..... .... .... ...:.... . ,� ... ......:. .. ... .. .......: ...r. ...... ,.r.. .. ... .r., ... .,..... .. ..,.. ...... ..... ... .. .,...... ... ..: ... r. ...... ... .. .... ,.,...., .. . ...... ...... ... .... ...... ..,... ... ... m E . W 6::A 8}N &l.Y] L5.90 SOUNDINGS OF THE BRUNSWICK RIVER WERE RECORDED AT BOTH BRIDGES, BUT WERE PERFORMED ON THE UPRIVER SIDE OF THE BRIDGES ONLY, ACTUAL DEPTH AT 60FT OFFSET FROM BRIDGE IS UNKNOWN THEREFORE IT WILL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO RECORD DEPTH AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM 20FT BELOW EXISTING GRADE ACROSSRIVER INSIDE DELINEATED WETLANDS, Utility Permit Drawing Sheet �ot_ r Owc oz_OF oa_ AYya.a• JUN 3 0 014 ------------------------- noxcr urera<e Ho. �Har Ro. - � 7.0 LAUNCH PIT 8 U/0 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE --- CA TV (EAR7NUAW) LINE 5 f -LMED- Sto. 55+50 +/- 0 I 0 g 8 � .Q E IAl1NCH PIT g 5 s W U/6 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE s NO CHANGE BRUNSWICK RIVER CROSSING HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL PROFILE VIEW o. ♦'.':.'.'.---- : '. .:� . . y D ARE m RECENIIJG %1 D BORE (11 41NCH HDPE SDR I EQUIPPED WITH (2) 1.25 INCH HOPE SOR It AERIAL VIEW 4A4®-Sta. 67+25+/- BRIDGE —US 17 N/US 74 EM 76 E/NC 133N— — — — — m I .c,'OAIPLM PLANS tEIAMINARY PLA\8 RECEIVED JUN 3 0 2111,4 AN Y. (1) A INCH HDPM E SDR 11 DI -mm CITY CANEERED 1 PAGE NOIS; EQUIPPED WITH (21 1.25INCH HDPESDR I I TEMPLAR, � SELYILLE. NC R TI-122 l wJ THESE PtldISARE o' MRE DR PROPRIETARYAND RNAty DI.1 '- INC3255 i SUfTE: C NOT BE REPROOIICEOR W B1vINGTON. NC 28d03 N)S R-3601 wsCLO^.aE� WITHOUT wwilErl cousEnr. 1 I Utility Permit Drawing Sheet `I II pt_ � S� I , ---------------------- NIGRCT UPIMCI NO. ! W W. -_"M 1A NO CHANGE L.< PRE ALLIGATOR CREEK CROSSING DIR€CTICMAL 6l; N I - -HORIZOWAL PROFILE VIEW ART -Sim 107+00+/- 4.Ri-Slo. I I6+00+/- US 17 N/L6 74 FJL676 E/NC 133N I I LIS 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 E/NC 133N 7.0 US 17 N/US 74 ENS 76 E(NC 133N - BRIDGE 7A • ,r LAUNCH PIT h pBORE _✓ �� RECEMNG PR O D BORE 871 FEET +/_ D BORE �M,! U/G CAN (EARTHLINK) LINE c y (I ) 41NCH HDPE SOP 11 3 EQUIPPED WITH (2) 1251NCH HOPE SDR I I fi AERIAL VIEW F a ' S {Ri-Sim 107+00+/- -LRT S1¢ 116+C0+/- 4 - — — — — — —US 17 NJUS 74 EAIS 76 E/NC 133N— US 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 EINC 133N - BRIDGE —US 17 N/US 74 E/US 76 E/NC 133N— — — — — — - _ 0 4 I � TU DgpRE�LAUNGH ORED BORE /0 CATV (EARTHLINK) LINE RECEMNG PIT RECENED c I � c I, S W (1) 41NCH HDPESDR I I JUN 3 O 2014 ENGINE8ZED AND A Y EQUIPPED WI1H (2) 1.25 INCH HOPE SDR it ^ TL. ti..� d..� PAGE NOTES: I - nw otW Ro. rc 1 L:.1� 4-� 4.1 U4i BELW.LE NC TF 122 ao THESEvuRS Arff D IROPPoEfARY ANp SR4LL D1.1 IMHp CITY 1 ���' 3255 MILL DRY Bi PIiDJER l0.M�ER NOT BE REPROWCE Oft �- i SUffE C Nt9rIDY0 tumour WIL�IINGTON NC?8403 NTS R-W) WPoTTEN wr6ENr. I ¢' I I I � I g Utility Permit Drawing SheetI � I E. I 3+ I _ I =' I s Utility Permit Drawinq Sheet _(,:_of_ t } �, JUN 3 0 2014 DCM.MHTI rrry Pls Sto 22+98.34 -L LED- P1 Sto 49+95.43 PIS Sto 74+98,35 Bs = 0' 45' 00.0' 0 = 38'09 OOA' (RT 1 95 = 0' 45' 00.17 Ls = 200.00, D = O' 45' 00.0' Ls = 20OLC LT = 133-53' L = 5A66.67' LT = 13333' ST = 56.67' T = 2.650.47' ST = 66.67' N 53' 59' 13.8' E (BACK) R = 7.639.44' SE = OD3 y� R + I \ d C Dit�X X X X X. 60'CMX � O]rC CYRILL F. THOMAS, E.T U% OR 836 PG 720 N0. wrH hOwERR AUTERx __... ...r ,roBvcrrrnn 17-74-76 10 rro Cur P1 Sto 12*59.51 PIS Sto 15+33.49 PI Sto 20+IL50 PIS Sto 23+68.76 p = f 07' 428 (LT) Os = 0' 47' 44.4- 0 = IT 55, o79 (LT) es = 2'02 96.6' D = 0' 47' 44.8' As = 2' 02' 47A' D = 2' 02' 46e Ls = 200.00 L = 518,30' Ls = 200A0 L = 58328' LT = 13334' T = 259.51' LT = 1469' T = 292.70' ST = 66,67' R = 7.2W,00' ST = 8535' R = 2.800DO' SE = 0.05 BEE PROFILE SHEETS �x -LAZED- POC St I+ 0.00- . *-L61C. 33+00 fl x .RPAY- ��Sr : 1 _ 00 (I6'LT) /NEW TIME WARNER ______.____ v '.. BORE PIT \ .Coos wrap NEW TIME WARNER _ — — HANDHOLE fi MQf CA Ff 6HE£ 7. .: a 91 RAlMMN[uBi Sa w`i NY E *5 CG 9/1/O 'EIr yt O GiOT 3 wNtT l��j BG P AE'y�R� x * CS=R�a4R Aai Sef SrEEl 9\ 3'Lili Sfiif-xd!'T .•.•- mot^' �}}}t y �. N f01 .ECHC CW '* .. . .. . * -LNED- POC Sm. 33+:500= * THE DISTRIBUTION POWER LINES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE !Raft. ""Na ND. s.W "c' ANDREW JACKSON BRIDGE WILL BE RAISED BY DUKE ENERGY IF ROAD'"AV DGWN f.NDINeeB NCDOT'S CONTRACTOR DETERMINES THE LOWEST CONDUCTOR IS RSCYiMpi;£'Ci NOT 20' ABOVE BRIDGE GIRDER REVISED 06/10/2014 I.) FOR -ZMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET 14. 2.) FOR -LiWD- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHEET OADWAY m STANDARD DRAR7.YGS, STD.1V0. 865.8I, SHEET I FOR SPECIAL MEDIAN GR- DJNG. 4)77B PROPOSED APPROACH SLAB TO MUSTENG APPROACH SLAB. _ NEW TIME WARNER AND EARTHLINK �. IN CONDUIT WITH NEW AT&T BORE a —�- F_ x .a. * D �RUE,cfi _i P.F CFMiER TEST yR B,I i R xE0. 59.89.5 9l' ODELL iVANS. JR.. ET U% DB T61 PG 38. , MECWNBRUNiMCK RIVS am * * �n 'T j r GB i50 PG T16 / 0 I .� I _ -` *�` \^ I , C✓ A YOf CnB.S PG * f t ii PRWCSED HAND xOu 1 \ �\ URBAN SMART GROWTH BELVR_LE. LLC I DIf•xDIEIDR iIEM Ia11,UB'HOPE SDR II * 3 uiEa ?B>IK. IOB l * x x S .* Y - ROIW®FMMUNK •.I ' - __yR� *�'.l '?f � x CI1]Tx01f WRIT TOWN OF BELv4LE J��"'�/'�.n ry x x* Be 5A PG 'V lvs zT Ma x * r B'%'C § ry URB<N GA14 M 20OPC 113 8CL`:0.LE. LlC * * * * * Y 1 P 9 R—E�l iC -r0.35.'YIS 1950 Y4R♦.� r K Y RN w -- `' T � IiOWN!'_T TRP a �"L` ' I* * x x * x * \\ .n _ 'RfP-_l' ,BSY - EEF TWP __�� '. x d 1 U O \$.'RCPOPE[t.W1 F -_ * * t a W SSRCx'SEW •�- DFECTrvyy� EP —�� 1' * x x > _ 's * MUNN I* x Utility Permit Drawing THE LOWEST CONDUCTOR ALONG _ p'=MB R. * * * A, *--Sheet -L Of DUKE ENERGY TRANSMISSION POWER --* ' * * * * * * --L— Ia�6 LINES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE * * — A. Am -°''�P '�, -� ANDREW JACKSON BRIDGE ARE 20' * ABOVE THE BRIDGE GIRDER ,' A, x : A, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • • P YOIK' N!I.ENQ YO. $M(!T NO, nOApwAr �lxcN MWM411Kf FNGINlCI 35 lNCIIN!!R f9s SO 22+98.34 4, S1a 6' 00' 04B es Sfo 7 5 06.0' LS = 0' 45' 00.0' = 38' 00' OOA' lRTI 8s = 0' 45' Ob.O' ...,,.L„, L 1 LT ' 1200 = 5D66E7'.0' T _ 13333' 1 �'@�i�'_� - ST = 66.67' T = 2.630.47' ST = 66E7' 3+ ;dlltilX: 7' N 53'59'13.8'E !BACK) R = 7.639.44' REVISED 06/10/2014 I aW,mr �m xwmnRrnux^ E7 SE = 0q3 PROP. U/0 TEL. & CATV LINES NOTES: Z i 1.) FOR--LbfED- PROFILE SEE sREETS 14 AEVD 15. * i SEE PROFILE SHEETS * * i 2) FOR-LMF.D- BRIDGE SRETw SEE SHEET I-M. * * * * $ * x STANDARD DRAWINGS, STD. NO.865.01, x A SKEET 1 FOR SPECIAL MEDIAN GRADING. A) FOR STRUCTURE PLANS SEE STRUCTURE * PLAN SHEETS S-X THRU S x NTIME WARNE NEW HANOVER SOIL R WATER CONSERV MST * * * * i I * * AWD EARTNLI NK * * * * * A N i oR nu Fc nc I * * rEW ATD TWIT I a A, I � \ x < RE * * * PROP. U/G CAN * * IR.• -NEW TIME WARNER x * i BORE PIT * * C * Q W * \ 'CL Iuw MY 2oNEW TIME WARNER * w. - fl EQ ` i,F—=�"n+•:•——tfr.°xr — — �HANDHOLE • I i * x i uR*uA rK _ -�`-- F Y< Wm Err ---E 'V' � �.a;:-;r __ — we .* n -- 9$T •4 SET "���F F p m �)� •s p v ---- a. - ST, GUI +71 E C NCP.E BeRw ME .64+lp uFn !e• v �esr e.dc rr --- — .Rs''y f \ — � WrR •� e�j, I 11ry�j�Ij .m� 1 * ¢ u F 190GN M� - xdi Wr n.x+Mir�� R �9 r�W.rF.n _ _ F,L,p¢ ./k..,- * * i �#ti...�..':.L`:. _::n:✓ti.�-'ry ".'� A \ IL %� x i {j NSC SWL \4 uw u! •.� � �+-✓ Fllagf®MAlHuru � •3f1 A� i i �.�1 If�l]TEpPE XM II "I,*i WN OFC'K Sif3 A \ i —_ Q SITE 1- 0.009 AC - WATER LEVEL \ \ E PRC)P 1UNSV/K'R OVER SORE ELEV-1.29' Q \!'� i fR Fp1M1E fMlFU Fllp(ISlp NAVD NOIf A/28/2009 \r�, pT IIIW'EbFF SCR I I NW m IN lar'SCR III 130 PM * z '� \\\ a F 'DENOTES -FILL IN 9 ..\ WETLAND o \`RE I DENOTES HAND JUN 3 2014 CLEARING DCM-WDCnY I m Utility Pe mit Drawinq v 1PTNWE<T TWG �� --� of 6E nroncr NC. REVISED 06/10/2014 PIS Sto 22+98.34 z P1 Sto 49+95.48 P15 Sto 74+98.35 65 = a 45' 00D' 4, = 38'0d OOD' (RT) BS = 0.45' 00.P -LLT- Ls = 20OD' D = 0'45'00.0' Ls = 2xw Pls SIG 87*13.96 Pt Sto 92*4545 Pis Sia 97+76J9 LT = 13333' L = S1X>6bT LT = /33.33' J2.rn ... ; c Bs = P 45' 00D' 4, = 6 58' 00.0'(LT) 6s = 0' 45' OOD' ST = 66b7' T = 2.630.47' ST = 66.67' �^- Ls = 2001001 = Ls - 203 N 53' 59' 13.8' E (BACK) R = 7.639.4,P - .µ. Y,,,, ° "" " LT = 13333' 245'' L L = 92889' LT = J3' SE = OD3 «N, , - ST = 6667' T = 465D2 S7 = 66b7' 66.67' w,. D- vvz S 86' 30' 46.2E (BACK) R = 7.639.44' -IxlC-i5 t•.p to fiw to-p Iw M SE = ODS -Lwk"?9'4 B]-p 10 Ss-p w1EDj 1 iLF 3TR .e-n110 Rk9S-p ;Rt) PpOP. U/0 CATV 'iryy � r k a + } } a INCOMPLE E PLANS .D xvr m..v. .rnmlrea. PRELIMIN RY PLANS Iw x w tcevenke nax + k + } k I } tS.iu<*ION-------^--_ _ _ _ /* -W. --"-�-`^-`--n _ --L8La T6-7 7,4Si7 $iC4.6'8L11-�8YXWME Mtsx LLYD T9 E-80.�L787y+r. �.Dpf i t r MtOLW v wo, 1 Y Y Y * ART TA 85+88.63 AN (46' T.) 1f DtINL DILCx it ue orklu * Y..r_. I�... _ } -------- - - -- -- W �' _ bD _ _ "` _ SITE 2- 0.004 AC _ - - -- - v _ — + an m 3Bn R .9 eSI RE ET us os.vs rvv.vs revr news xen g r<fDnvorcx n _ - ` �1 EXIST.- --\ n es r, s. m-... svi ss xesi y —a= ^t LAIEIY 9 w Be' a ." I ,.envy ^ ___—_——..__—__ < —_•s. , ran .rr _ _ °c'm66+06 -LMED- __ r ___ _ P«�If�N.7S+3 -LM P' i 9+ -L - -- ---- V SB' �'�-.� L--'�... ""..... J4^' } 1° k Y * rfaouo uanNrrt "I•R•�✓ REMOVE EXIST. w w H aea + I—cce*N.our I } �`^ nwrmmrwWxuxn S -') f4 Y ' .Y 1'n .LHSD- CS SM 74+31.69 mmrs wssoawrm wrx * Y -LRT- P07 Ssa. 85+N0.63 EMMx m6ikC0YlfwfLr45 Y _I Y } * SITE 3= 0.0001 AC 1 I I rt( Of a wl. _ �-------------- I.1 % F DENOTES FILL INk w WETLAND s — Utility Permit Drawing i DENOTES HA Sheet—q_of a G NOTES: JUN $ 2014 o afr aF eEl-vw''E LNxxoxN 1.) FOR -LMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET 1S. l.) FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET I& -~ 3.) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET Is. DCM-. CITY I 5 I I � ,"ACT 0129210 No. lNIF: R-3601 7 REVISED 06/ 10/2014 ff.rv°1e Pls Sto 22+9834 PI Sto 49*95.49 P/s Sta 74*98.35 e5 = 945' 00D' A = 38'OC 00.0' (RT) es = O 45' 00.0' -LLT- Ls = 200.00' D = a45'OOfY Ls = 200A0' P ,Ll Pis S7° 87+1396 PI Sto 92+4565 Pis Sto 97+76J9 LT = /3333' L = SA66bT LT = /3333' ...m r i30;.',,, , 'cn ,,,�. _ LI es - 0' 45' 0017 L = 6' 58' COD' (LT/ eS = 0' 45' OOD' ST = 66b7' T = 2b30.47' ST = 66.67' �- 0" Ls = 200.W D = 0' 45' 00.0' Ls = 200AD" N 53' 59' 13B' E (BACK) R = 7.639.44' a'.w- s.: ° va w LT = 133.33' L = 928B9' LT = 13393' SE = OD3 '^. - - ST = 666T T = 965A2' ST = 66bi' w D. vuL S 86' 30' 46.2E (BACK) R = 7b39.44' SE = OD5 -Lw Vr M-m TO srw Tf-0 ��DD)� 9 -l*YS 4f4!!+m TO SrA M W lMEDI 'i -LLT- ft0. !!-!I TO ftA, 0!-°0 flil PROP. U/D CATV T L k iq )(]{j{j � � Y 3 ��. 3 ' 24w✓.rtiy� y i k x I 4 3 Y Y �0 . 3 n. x�u M sW-w l RLnifaa. e 3 Y x j -LLT- - Sin. 8Jr80.63 8� L� winos Y '�� 3 \ 1 3 °0 R� 3 * 1 - c:eR.wm�-LLTTA.87+ PIJL' , 85 6. i8A9 BF� lti _ cNN v or[N • \\ ruow+ v ortcry Y * * iRT- PDT 7A. 8J+80.6? AN (46' 7.J ife oeruL L C f@ z XL L y _ . _ - 1. !:.: 1 _ .•ytM.F..�yP-�yKy,.rG^' z_ _ _ _ t I h P I X --_ -- ,». ---- SITE 2a 0.004 AC F .. -- + RSET uses- usraw.us rswic°ss fa m+ y _ _ s� y wIDJN V °I n \ z. o v _ n EXTST. u ui ns r,e r+., zsw- ns xas. = h h:✓1-. — �— — — —u a —tea._ _b __� - — n— _�—o— o- _.--rr� �a tout rsHIZ P.t e ✓ Y: C 9V 30' 48.2" E .3� -e _� _ _ _ _-- _ _353— IN'as:,,w,y ssn I usn..us >.c.us rai.xc ,ss Bb+OS -LMED- ue Y 1 �l — I— - �.ea- — y.— m -LMED P / 79+7 L — — —_—--...,aws�"# "=LM _ -- - - z „. _ _ h►jl (is _ _ _ _ !aa ' + so' J . _, tu-�W-�„q:r _ 3 \ Y ,ROPOS!°1M111JNF ' a RSMDV6 SXIST. W x � .\ (41uroremRll t_ GL'ARDRAIZ i✓ Q � �r `-s• t Y i (v '; l„�j✓ '+-.., .�.a/_'_-__Y ____ � __ �u_____.-^. t -ZMED- CS sa 74+31.68 y 3 (4 t]PXOR[!°R II �J" "'�✓' 1 Y I I mp,rs .� fp°xTFI, nrx • y t * 3 y / - I !"5 I ffniK+ Nf17.mW ixQ1rE5 1 x • },J 3 x SITE 3= 0.0001 AC .ill B LVk 1 1 * I W � I LJ F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND w.R=a _ Utility Permit Drawing 3 Sheet—Lpot f} DENOTES HAND- f� JUN 0 7 4 I Q, ®E-i. E I N G I � c° CIrI OF BELVILLE __ D M-lOr�tii97TV _�-- unxnawN 1.) FOR -LMED- PROFILE SEE SHEET IS. 1 c ®- t) FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET Id. I vo 3.) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 18. I INCOMPLE E PLANS wa R„r v,a rax . . umrax PRELIMIN ftY PANS m xoT w ro .m+nw IKO: CT UNKENO NO. SHEC" R-360/ 1 i KM' SXEE- NO. Y/s STO H<tlJ. 0' 00.0' r fura YZt4pbJ YIs xa Y(K9�gJs'MIT:H PIS Sr°, y6t .42 Pl S)a 101+49J1 Pis Sra 105+7965 eS = 45' p = 6- 58' Cuo. 45' �A' Bs - Zl'3r�'' b p = 6' 58' OOD' (LT) eS = P 45' 00.0' Ls = 200.00' D = O' 45' 00.0 - D = 0' 45' OOD' Ls = 200D0' LT = 13333' L = 92869' ° r ** LT = i ;, P L7 = 139.3 ' L = 928B9' LT = 13333' ST = 6667' T = 465D2' w. �T VA166,67' ST = 66.67' T = 465.02' ST = 6667' S 86' 30'462' E (BACK) R = 7.639.44' R = 7.639-44' SE = 0.05 -E:T- nA K5-sE To nA, K5-9s IKII SE = OD25 INCOMPLE E PLANS Ka Nor AA 5aa "rnmrcma PRELIMINARY m T,m w PLANS cwamKmam N OL DENOTES FILL IN -� WETLAND ED 0-6-t-1D-/_2-01 DENOTES HAND CLEARING 3 8 PROP. U/9 CATV y ig ) A Y f Y f fR f 3 Y 3 3 3 3 j + R✓ {� * * Y * } * VV a Lf f I I * 3 x * 3 Qfl x * x I NEW HKNOVER SOIL & WATER CQVSERV WSi I * * OR 1722 PG 776 f r I Y * Y Y z }* x I Y Y Q f t 1 Y x x a I. f x Y f 1.4 x z f f Y • t Y I I -. Q rsi.t Rn r Y Y Y Y } x Y x } W CLEANI {C S Vf W CL E V Ah° . }a.-..-f - .o°°s * r Y _ _ _ * _ION W. 6 9 v T- SC Sra. 87+ .69 ( .. _ .. 1 _ r' I Y x Q 3 (.j-LLT--rCS St. 97+OM2 " h � f Y� x -- - - e•e c it Mf * *-__z___w____KnJ_______ x en s �rHs iI JRJ.zTCNs___ - LLT T Sm +09.i2 - tJ-y _ ams `-^✓`a+p� mTmrdp_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -F-- aso. �:E .. F 1� —' -- _ _ _ _ _ _ yW" a TN^T.c I n _ 4 �-------- " RSMOVF 14 Car- — — --- ------------------ 4t 1 l'M [r Mk' Y DRYN Vy� a5a t� -i ,••` • GRI$� _ 5[E OEiAM1: a80 MIOIM v INTCH, I SI, M Y F �— w� seE DITM E see on.ul — F — — m�a � SITE 2 --g----g --- �? ,� r------- e° F J—AC KE.:cYt SAD �+ Y"R5" .m 90+6 .- . LR - - - PKavosm EMMI➢IK� �3� _ _ — �� — -- _- F ----_—_— — "'F 7 KV * EARTHLkIh.;;.,,:;r X.,wXaE #iANDHOE_. - * �* * i - ' _ _ �KEdFFiSR�^^•—*_c e 1 m ' °F LVILL SITE q= 005 C -LRT- TS Sm. I+$4.09 95+6 -LRT- r } } * { 0. (FILL) —* — -- TOWUCFEEN TKP + $6o'uva vsrrron d _ --� IIEOPWFO EARMLINK f x' * f — F LVIL-IA f x e: .A.%- SC Sic %+84.09 i 1 r i + Ln * z f f f * y SITE 6= 0.032 AC 3 f 3 f * Y 3 Y * * f f t Q x Y 3 f t I 0 20 4 3 f + ' xp Utility Permit Drawing Slleet_J L_.Of �} OT'M F�2�) !.)FOR -LLT-PROFILE SEE SXEET /6. 1 = FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 78. I 30 I y I 3 !f!RlNCR N°. I RRv. No '�3601 9 DENOTES FILL IN, WETLAND ENOTES HAND REVISED 06/10/2014 INCOMPLE E PLANS or °v .ER W .mmnraw PRELIMINARY PLANS eR xor uv c°nmucnax ILIZ CLEARING -LLT STA. 108 + 79.86 I x x PROP UNG CATV WILL TIE INTO Q� tia Q Ci y = EXISTING CATV CONDUITS ATTACHED END BRIDGE - Q \ $ x x TO EXISTING BRIDGE x /-/q a \ PROP. U/G CAN Y - y x H x fl • £} Q 4 Qp* •go * Y WNCREEK TWRTW _ P np * W TIE PROP. EXIST.�� Ifi/�Ij . .,, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,,,_ * _ _ _ _ _ , x = W \' IN SECTION � I " * "'°+* h os oo _ "utsMIM A y * * + * NRNA riou r x t y;' = x A_ 300'7RAN ITIO I -*. _____ _ y O __-IWW1aTRz EXlS3F, T R. — rw MT — I � ° '�N 88° 01` 13.8" E v ti Arar N b` 01 8.8 E �'� _-. zasr ` c TARWn w s.uc caro•,s 4P• u,L y — = — SITE 6= 0,032 AC 5 300'LAhE TR"SITION — -�+ 2n L i \ tws R Rf w T&RIR`a 42? 0 Q '� 3 r \ WATER ELEV-1.33" I P,a-afMl WPC - �LW` 2 4y 1 ,Cb ]9LYa pGLA 'VIiaR SITE 7= 0.003 AC Y. yR_ �P M1V / ELEVWA t9p t_ I_ STD CMO n aAaj' C�*C! d Q Q Q tR coc es. eeoremu sv. �,_fl Cl \ eAenJZPk'-o�XVR.l eRaurvo' I + sod AS3ItANs'1TTON 107+47°T V°.!W r. ,,. - .. im _ z<azT R""P ° --- �R —+. "I I N 88° 1' 13 8" E Py REMD _ p1+S0 m--- ---- rj N 0 14 P � u Y Y ' g + i * \ .000 1 _ _—+s un in ^ CVH*�H SL.fiLl' I — * n ' j iR TA.112+84.17 DCM-mm I'. ` * _ : aEGIN NLbA,°R aeeR aOR ORSL.JtoRR RnILW"T I Eiil) BI�IDG w PRO.p{(p EMiM1NK PR•PCb®XANp�1°LE •- ,)t0.108+1].98 I z I]II]S'XOPla°R11 II ES r �{pPlfORll T- S .112+60.OtUt11' P -IItT I aR°IN RNO' _ \ = y� * _ W !Y emit Drawing .cRT * Y * ; ,g: \*,� r • * eet of_1�-Pls Sto 96+17.42 PISto !01+4911 PIS Stu 106+796596 = 0'45'00,9 L'I = S58'00.0'(LT) 9s = 945'00.0' +I = Ls 20.00 xD = 0*45 00n Ls = 20O � I BEG APPROACHLT - 133.33' L= 928B9' J'A= 133.53' x N E STATE PORTS Au... • '.109+50.83 S A xorBs: ST = 6687'T = 465A2' ST = 6687' ` oR zcR PC '_TI c "8 PROFILE SEE SHEETS 16 IUM 17. R = 7.0.025 • \ x r ! 2.) FOR �LLT- SE = 0425 \ BE BRIIiGC x 2J FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEETS 18 AND 19. eW \ -LRT STA. 109 _ 75.00 3.) FOR -LLT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHEET Z�U I � 4.) FOR -LRT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHERT 2-M. I vs' LLT- PIS to 116+66D9 P/ Sto 124+1016 Pis Sto 131+0859 es = 4'30'0010' A = 37'16'30.0(RT)es = 4'3D OOD' Ls = 300D0' D = 3'0900A' Ls = 300.lXY LT = 200,06' L = 124250' LT = 20ODF ST = 100.06, T = 644JY ST = 10OD6' R = /,909B6' SE = OD7 -RPLLT- Pls sto 116+80.05 PI SIG 122*03.59 PIS Sto 126+7390 Bs = rO5'33Z L = 0YO0r125'(RT)es = r58'41D' Ls = 30OD9 D - 243'42f Ls = 145D0' LT = 200D5' L = 845.56 LT = 9667' ST = 100.05' T = 42859 ST = 4834' R = 2JOOD9 SE = OD7 Y Y x 8� x _ x x Y - S ev_o %Cry O e etW $umt x -l-"3- x _ 710, _, y Y x Eta. 11 A. J]4880= LLT- S7 Sea 11}.8p'LZ)Y REVISED 06/10/2014 F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND Y x Y DENOTES A'ND Y Y CLEARING Y NEW HANOVER SOLI 8 j4iER CONSERV 01STRI Y OR 684 PC iK x x �RI Y Y [M I Y Y k �38 Y PROP, U10 CAN Y Y Y7 Y m Y 3 Y Y Y x x x p _ — * t Y �l __- + ___ _ _'r`- _ L �� ♦y^W - a �.MW TnluemnY. —� E 10= 0.0003 AC NO. INCOMPLE E PLANS x=r aae roe .comvrmN PRELIMIN m NPr . RY PLANS awrrreaetmN * EAD cox 1'$UCTlBN ' EGIN*RESURPACI G v LLT- C S7A,127,+J5.0p -RPLLT- CS Sw 126+2536 Nac y •°Po: •_�-= '1 ,� Ore l _ r 'Pl I ^N hD CCNS `� -_ d �AV tv Ilk AWW. m� -RPLRT- CS Su 118+39J7 Y eao^s -LRT SC SK J18+37.97-RPIRT-SC Sea. 110-39.77RECEWW YR& ,.� `Y 'i,.ti \i \\\\ \\ \ �...4y •0�S m -TS` t3 raonutReer �. __ - x -.1 fji2, HS,Y ;�\- `=' 1 _LR Y PT Sta. R3+2&68 . Y gg+ +, ��\\\ \ JUN 3 0 2014 m 2Y Y -� 18.E Y Y -LRT- Y R `S x \� \ \\ P • t- \ Y Pls Sto V *38D3 PI Sto 124+2&B9 PIS SIG 130+8053 3D OOQ' A =* 3-r 16' 30D'!RT es = r 3D OOD' \ \ x * Ls=Y300.00' 0 = 3'00'07D' LS = 300DO DCM-Mnmy Y LT = 200D6L = 1J4250' LT = 2OW6' �NyNow \ M * cr _ ,M rx- T cRR°'Y Y 17- = 100.06' Y 1 � Y END CONSTRUCTION t daaaN B10 P\oNpi RPLRT- POC STA. 122+75.00 (n t HOPE MR I EM(2; 0r Hope WRI I * Utility Permit Drawing P= 8'n6+8aJ6 32s8 P1s Stu 128+SL97 8 \ Sheet._L? Of1- m 22 OOD'!l '30A'fRT)es = 5'5956.-r S c= ` D = 2 4r 0u' S8.4• Ls = 200D0 `P L = 3/17T LT = 133.41' T = 156J6' Y LT = 11292 7 = 392B9 Y SI" = 6674' 'HA 3fj ST = 87.45' x R = 965D0 NOTES: �\ SE = OD8 �� 1.1 FOR -LLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 17. x * �� — — 1) FOR -LRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 19, IAVFMCNT aEMDV,d y J.) FOR APLRT- PROFILE SEE SHEETS 22 AND 23. 4.) FOR RPLLT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 23. I .51e1w[NLl NO. I ww. NO. I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I _ REVISED 06/10/2014 INCOMPLE E PLANS m um os ev emvmnwe PAELIMIN m e� as RY PLANS mwwtwwcnw * r * * x L * = 9 * * r x y f * x = y *� : * * = r f r s * = x IO _ * = x y r r •-RPLiT-PC Sta 138 s81. r r r f r Vi} f / y r r r r r r = -RPL - PT SNi, 138+31.80 X NEW HiWlVER SOIL 8 wnTER [ONSERV g5iR1 x x "+e = 08 6M PG 716 r x .'. r x x = x _ * _ =wMunl _ /-RPLLT- SRS Sw. 127+7A36 - /------^'—N r : f'tE�S- ,iM[De •Buq (y •p� _3 IM1 T FV41.1 �� PROP. U/0 CATV a = r x �.... 4�• �. spy \\ * G m. 129+1 8 w6ms * - ' X \YS .5 Tab * = f f y Y� M w�' t� * * y = y xx\\ \\\ F \ u 1 = r y -RPfLT- � ='f= = f es Ls 5�5pB D _ 640r WiL7iJ1..I `.^-_...J * r = r \ \ ,,66 e LT 96.71' r L - ➢1623'l s mhos = y 57 =k437' T - 51254 = _ = fS. I = = f / y r = y \ \ \ \ \\\ \ END TIP ' RO CT R-3601 * f "L —LRT— POC STAE1.30�= _ ° - V ��\\VV �m�•� \� \� f f�\ * f f s'\ Y m \ \ `�,\ a`\ wF- / ".� -LLT- ST 3" 133+0L53 = _ _ UN=3 0 2014 -LRT- CS S 129+80.47 II * * + r y = S A+�A� = f y y 1 f f /� •�tit��.+: b \� \� \\�\,�\\ = r * •d = f * _ = x = f �» \ \\ - - •a f y y _ Utility Perrpit DrAwing \ + eet�ot �- L) FOR .Ll@7- PROFLLB SEE St71tE2 M. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MV SNFf' NG. -RI°LRT--RPlZT- jeavw.r oeswv Nrowuuts ING:N@d Pl Sra 167+79.9/ Pt 57a 142+3/.77 MOINES K ^/q5 0 = 3'03' 50.0 p = 3' 18'3lLTI .2' K K L - 244.78' L = 689.42' 11, " PO T = 122-57' T = 34998' " " " K R = 1,870.00 R = Ib25,9a " K rt K " K REVISED 0611OY2014 k% " [� c K " 4J K 1J rt 8+-RPLLT- POT Sra 148+1i.93 �.`1 K I • h .mot. • -}9-POT Sta. IB•:OO.DO ` K �a`y \ 4• K K K � 1 " h ��R " � � ti'•if•t.^ K xRws /-RPLLT- PT Std 14S+71.22 , xS/ -4 ` xUA ik k ` k K � \ /� BEGIN CONSTRUCTION k _—Y3—'OT STA.10+23.60 k k END RESURFACING " t` w - POT ST'A.150_ 00.00 _ _ --- 5j45—` `. " k " k V K xoo^s" _ s N OF — _ c IE \� ♦ dlCi M Np C seer=��— ,0Q _ R / ` us v s uS r. > us +ns .c �n s v.•a:ac Rsr 1 .x,1Jp5 / �// -r � Mi.-r r � • _ u'p,..,r ��•� /%// �i K u� •`\ �% / // i ie ' .. , � m Li ".. k k KxOP]5 J� /�/// / SR MAIL 1 -- - - -. _ _ - _.. k•� __ - '/xas ii'� _.8 ..�'^'" _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ � gjiT7+fL_t0 Rhin/ �m j./�6•.�.��� £c ._ -. __ K µ, / /, JS// O/ 4+� .i isLisv , J51• Ee / i l i — 5a� k, - 1 KCWS CJ'GIiCB — '•S. u' _G F JSRx //R �i' i� •Vk 't��•v� K \y `i/ 1NR ix� I /NCDO� 60y2 ♦ " ¢ +�-RPLtFT-• PT I. log 2 K •� / / / v/ `N71 APSR + /� .xx• 'a$ i� 1 k. 97 a TRAFFIC DIAGRAM a US 17-74-42L' "'"_ /� / / ' _ -• K e v i " 1, �I R �` K ��Uyytility Permit Drawing 0 2 2! TiC 133 26,321 i ��/ r "e'�°s< Ap, " .. .. K K " e' 1 I II o ; xoW t spRin CPp0AtlP.et-..LLOt I- n 39,600 39'600 x, us+;/�/niEO K w' z S60 00 aaa sag k 1 END CONSTRU ON woou ; lI m g t 2035 ADT gLCT20 } 0 p0 K Y3 1 G Sro 73�3118 " �� " RPLRT— PqT STA.166+50.00 JUN 8 0 2 1, I m � GOK Tr SrR• 160 �n / c SR 1352\\ - _. B (BATTLESHIP RD.) , _ i 1 % eq t .� P,1 Stu 14+6850 - PI Stu 20+58.44 �!- K " COhS�'RGCTION n22lESH'R@4 A = 48'39'00.0'(RT) p = 74'05'15.7(LT) = xorB: \ K BOMMopG f a % mj. / ; kY3— STA. 13+58.00 0 = 15 583 D = 3 00.0' y 1.) AO PROFILE PROVIDED FOR LEFT nXIV °e c " " , � / " - 2,6Y L42VE tf7DEY OFF TIM EXISTLYG. \. \ \ \ K " " ice' a' ! ii/ <r. " ♦ R = 30/.56' R = 301.56' 2.) FOR RPZRT- PROFILE SEE SHEET 23. I Im COMPlE E PLANS Nor vxx van .muwtm PRELIMINARY W Mm VY PLANS cwfRULTIm I . j A ° Q MACT MENRI CF No. SHEET NC. afrt No. ROADWAY 01s . HroA M= FNOINM FNONVIR \� % T URBAN SMART LROw H BELVILLE. LLC / W 2a51 PG a «L \ / It OR 2BSIPL f .F OOR 3lil PG �DB ++ 9 Y--POT sa 36+/ , fig'" l X -YAWL y $fa 36++,,�� 8J (20.7S'LT.) -YSBL 1'O Ssw. 36+d7. (2R7J'R7)\ \ } O DO T7�PL 1.9WNING roe 96T Pc ae POWER LINE \ ROTAT& EXISTING NANNHOLE TOP USE PAY NC.0 \a�I+-W ITEM ROTATE EXISTING MANHOLE TOP" OR 25 r \` PaoPwFO we \ "ROTATE EXISTING MANHOLE TOP WITH ) esO ctlr_ s�m°ta f o s.ri�ps mFrHant unu yY '\\ +� 1 NEW(ECCENIFIC TOP)' T 1 1 1 ;� 130.0. aw END CONSTRUCTION RfNvx 130.00' y + { -Y- PRC 3 73.92 '+, it °` _ Exlsr.awx F . \ .i —Y— STA. 41+9�.2.3 ecs`r. i ronY� •� �__ { POT - �r�r. E.ISIYG + 1 F9tRH90 M lV i OSCt LlL�'{ —. •9} ' _ i 9 -Y- POT SF{a 42+79.72 s { NORTH CAROLINA STATE Hwy COWw Y ��— Y 'Y N9 REFS. 21 �. L -.Y8_{ { { T.x .c. 3.ox-Y. P7 Ss¢N1+03. (30.7J'LT.) ----- -- ----- _ ' { - + .V , CCC ° .cwirs'u+ yT 1 Gila �ITRANSMON 6'88RM pp5 ry -BL-S -- _ _ _ _ _ _- 1 h °' ei. - s—TQ}'SROL71]BRkxaTfw nn ` NCOOT PS MON.p... I + ro 10'R ,�,. aE 1 a u yv s+°= s+vc a•Pvc n� i ' •,) 81° 17 07 " E C IA S � •v --- .__. ° ry _ —_--_-- I— — _ _ _ _ _ _ . •• —� � + ---- ----"— Arm — REPAIR FILL WE AS ER W wleN• sn C P vl 1 /—�""'L' — 0 DIRECTED Bt GINEER �''y7•' MWT- R•+5 TRAA'S. REMI u• RCP mcos ^ .< L & RT =J 0=50=225'� [ + 9, H EX � i , ti � � _ ue or o SANDEEP AP R, El. IIY E, V f M°•' ZZJMP SFf Ofl H 96.00' - �� URBPH SMART GROwrH{BELVI&E. LL[ � •a°= n s OB 2B30 PG %./ / p0 28 PL 90 OR 36T PC PROP. Sn 15.63 -Y2- D,�O 4 _ '..\ Y �' re zn�Pc MO _7 PG 5 ^ / 7 —3= St.. 3 87 { { + FLAMINGO PROPERTIES, LLC WATER LINE _ 0 fi ,� BELVILLE - 7 S 4. .OP { y y OR use K aM 14 . 4 P ORE TIES. LLC % i I y OB 27T PG 152 T .NCS — "l , _ yc^s { i ,w.'c� \y. ♦ .. Al CIT - FH - K g xn. 5 q {o'+ I '' 86 14 '8, f Foxe sh _ { { z�� E �E� / Ro" TRAFFIC DIAGRAM vu,I +a � + + PI STu 37+5936 PI SIC 39+8351 4 / art DITCH ii`"' E 51. { yam, / p = 2' 1Y 17.Y (LT) p = Z I1' I7.� (RT I y 19,829 Aa ORAL A � �¢ yam/ D = FT 57' 177' D = 0' 57' IT7• NC ]33/RIVER RD. li �� AQ1y� O C - 229Ja L - 229N' 33,400 30,100 P { 85. / \\• SE=-tiN001:0' NC 5E 6NC 700 / 1500 4 'IT pp( • °6w* 5,700 2,300 r + C W +FS GFQlSiIL! ]] i . \p _]rJ_ (A IPA i _ I Pi SIG 15+3238 P/ Sto 03972 5,4SO 10J3 AD7 o C=1 8+ I�{ / D = 10"563J52_' ?-7' (RT! � 59' S2 079' sLTI 8,200 1035 ADT Ej /4 L = 10 25' OZ7' D I ' 8- 43.9 H c p L s•/ / n d F UCHMDB 3 E PC PROPERTIES. LLC. S \ SR I55J 'P CLV! P RP W /{ + 25 R = 550D0' T = 215.93' (MACRWRLL RD.) I 5 \ Mr.e row > A :- n � � 9 m w�l IA `.�st. t. sr. , 'ts a fi{ - - \\ Utility Permit Drawing THOMAS HALL MOTE: +2 Oe :evPc es \ Sheet�_oflj_ L) FOR -Y- PROFILE SEE SSEET 24. +J OB 9A of 9p Z) FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SRBET 25. -Y2- PT Sw. Im wOMPLE w .An E PLANS .rnvRrrm PRELIMIN RY PLANS w norm cawerwRrnm a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY 1. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY May 21, 2014 Wilmington Regulatory Field Office N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources US Army Corp. of Engineers Division of Coastal Management 69 Darlington Avenue 400 Commerce Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Morehead City, NC 28557 ATTN: Brad Shaver NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sirs': ATTN: Stephen Lane NCDOT Coordinator Subject: Modification Request for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23, Section 10 Permit, CAMA Major Development Permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for proposed widening of the US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange, Brunswick County. Federal Aid Project No. NHS-0017(68); TIP No. R-3601. Debit $240.00 from WBS Element 38868.1.1 References: R-3601 404/401/CAMA permit application dated April 26, 2013 R-3601 Nationwide Permit 23 and 5, issued August 19, 2013 (SAW-2007- 03461-010) R-3601 Major CAMA permit, issued August 2, 2013 (#89-13) R-3601 401 Water Quality Certification, issued May 16, 2013 (DWR# 13- 0472) The purpose of this letter is to request modification of the issued permits on this project to account for design changes and approved moratorium in -water work methods. Please find enclosed revised permit drawings, sturgeon concurrence letter from the National Marine Fisheries Service, and agency correspondence regarding construction methods for the above referenced project. Please replace permit drawings from the original submittal with the full set included with this modification request. As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange by adding one auxiliary lane in each direction. This project involves the MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-707-NU. 1ECEMD LOCATION NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX 919-212-578W CENTURY CENTER BUILDING B PROTECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WESSITE. WWW.NCDO RG 1020 BIRCH RODE DR. 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 27610 RALEIGH NC 27699-15Q M�1V D^A _Ilfi T `!` replacement of two bridges over the Brunswick River with one bridge carrying both travel directions. Additionally, the northbound bridge over Alligator Creek will be replaced and the southbound structure will be widened. To further alleviate congestion problems, a second auxiliary lane in the northbound direction will be added. _ There will be 0.41 acre of permanent impacts to riparian wetlands resulting from fill, excavation, and mechanized clearing resulting from project construction, of which 0.03 acre are impacts to CAMA wetlands. This is a decrease from the previous permit which allowed for 0.44 acre of permanent impacts to wetlands of which 0.04 were impacts to CAMA wetlands. A total of 105 linear feet of permanent stream impacts are also anticipated; this is a decrease from the 185 linear feet that were previously permitted. A revised EEP acceptance letter showing the decrease in impacts will be forwarded to you upon receipt. The permanent impact area due to bridge bents will be 0.03 acre which is a 0.01 acre increase from the previous permit. The design bridges will have fewer columns than previously permitted however the diameter is greater. This change was necessary in order to construct the structures and comply with the in -water work moratorium. Temporary work bridges will also be necessary to construct and improve bridges on this project. The existing clearances will be maintained on both the Alligator and Brunswick Rivers. A primary nursery area in -water work moratorium will be observed from January 1 to June 30 for Alligator Creek and from January 1 to September 30 for the Brunswick River. Limited in - water construction methods to be used during the in -water moratorium include working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding associated with barges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer, and installation of casings using the screwing in method (see attached memo and correspondence). Regulatory Approvals CAMA: NCDOT requests that the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development permit (#89-13) issued on August 2, 2013 be modified to account for a decrease in impacts and change in approved in -water work methods during the moratorium as noted above. Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be re -issued under the existing Nationwide Permit 23 (refer to NWP 23 issued on August 19, 2013 SAW-2007-03641-010). Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3891 will apply to this project as it was previously permitted (refer to 401 Water Quality Certification issued on May 16, 2013 DWQ#: 13-0472). All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will continue to be met. NCDOT is providing this application to the NCDWR for their review and approval. WENED MAY 2 7 2014 DCM-MM CIW A copy of this permit modification request will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: httt)s:Hconnect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.asox under Quick Links > Permit Applications Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Amy James at aejames2@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6129. Sincerely, Richard Hlncock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2014 '3 DCM-M iD CnY 4 Stantec Memo To: Amy James From: Melissa Ruiz NCDOT, Natural Environment Section 801 Jones Franklin Rd. Raleigh, NC 27606 File: Date: March 7, 2014 Reference: NCDOT R-36oi Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge Replacements and Widening Construction Methods This memo is to follow-up on the construction methods discussion that took place during the Environmental Pre -construction meeting on March 3, 2014. Constructability of the project has been an issue especially considering the in -water work moratorium in place on Alligator Creek (1/1 - 6/3o) and the Brunswick River (1/1- 9/30). In an effort to improve constructability, and protect the environment around these project sites, our team is requesting permission to use certain construction methods for in -water work that are currently prohibited during in -water work moratorium periods. The use of some of these methods during moratoriums have already been approved and included in permits (Item 2 on permit #89-13 from DENR/CRC) or the Environmental Scope of Work from NCDOT (Items 1-3) while others were discussed during our meeting on March 3. So that we may facilitate the permit application approval process in April/May 2014, we are presenting a comprehensive list of the construction methods in order of importance that our team would like to utilize for in -water work during the moratorium periods: i. Working inside of casings year round — Use of this method is considered an exception from the moratorium according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT. 2. Static pile extraction — Use of this method was considered an exception from the moratorium according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT. This method of extraction is useful for some activities such as spudding. However, due to the characteristics of the substrate and sediment located in the waterways, using this method to remove existing piles and temporary work bridges will likely lead to pile fractures as they are pulled. 3. Spudding associated with barges — Use of this method was considered an exception from the moratorium according to the Design -Build contract with NCDOT. 4. Removal of piles using vibratory hammer — According to the NMFS concurrence letter (received by NCDOT 11/6/2013 and provided as an attachment to this memo) in the Project Effects section, the extraction of existing piles by vibratory hammer shall be considered an exception to the in -water moratorium. 5. Installation of casings using the screwing in method — Specific information regarding this method was provided to regulatory agencies. In response to the information, NMFS indicated "route of potential adverse effects from the design modification (i.e., the angering) proposed to be implemented during the in -water moratorium period" (communication with Eric Hawk, NMFS, 2/19/2014 and provided as an attachment to this memo). 6. Installation of piles using vibratory hammer — According to the NMFS concurrence letter (received by NCDOT 11/6/2013 and provided as an attachment to this memo), "vibratory driving of piles or bridge DaYpn wM comrruiy In mind MAY 2 7 2014 DC.V-h`.HDCrIy ® Stantec March 7, 2014 Amy James Page 2 of 2 Reference: NCDOT R-3601 Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge Replacements and Widening Construction Methods support structures, or removal of old bridge structures, generates a continuous but low-level noise and is unlikely to cause more than noninjurious, insignificant behavioral effects to sturgeon." 7. Installation of casings using vibratory hammer — This method is very similar to Item 6 with the exception that it will take slightly more time as the casings for the bridges must penetrate into the PeeDee substrate while piles for temporary work bridges may not be installed to the same depth. One of the principal objectives of the bridge designs adopted by our Team for this project has been to minimize the amount of all in -water work Results of our efforts have led to a reduction in the total number of pier columns that will be in the water. Project R-36oi was permitted under the Department's design with 45 columns in water at Brunswick River and 28 columns in water at Alligator Creek Under our design, we propose to place 26 columns at Brunswick River and 18 columns at Alligator Creek within the banks of these waterways, yielding a total net reduction of 29 columns that will be constructed in the water. Our Team would also like to share that the actual time of casing and pile construction in the water will represent a fraction of the time that the contractor's forces will be at work on placement of these bridge foundation elements. While this is an approximate percentage, we estimate 25% of the total time the contractor is installing casings and piles will actually involve vibrating or screwing these structures into place. The majority of the time required to perform this work will be devoted to moving equipment, splicing casings and pile segments, and setting up for each installation. As a final benefit to the environment, the ability to use some or all of these construction methods during moratorium periods should serve to decrease the length of time that the temporary bridges will remain in place during the course of the project. With low levels of noise and vibration, minimal disturbance of bed materials, and no pile driving or casing installations with impact hammers at any time while in the water, our Team believes that the flexibility offered through the use of these construction methods described in this memorandum will enable construction work for bridge foundations in the least amount of time. We appreciate having this opportunity to describe our proposed construction procedures in greater detail. If you or any one of the individual agencies would like to bring specific questions to us, please do not hesitate to contact me. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Senior Environmental Scientist Phone: (919) 865-7529 Fax: (919) 851-7o24 melissa.ruiz@stantec.com Attachment: NMFS Concurrence Letter DeMan With com,■dry in mind MAY 2 7 2014 DC'vl-NPjDC:TY Ruiz, Melissa From: Baker, Jessi E <jessi.baker@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:06 PM To: Wilson, Travis W.; lames, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium I concur with WRC that I do not support installation using vibratory hammer during the moratorium Jessi Baker, Fisheries Resource Specialist NC Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 (252) 808-2808 ext. 213 iessi.baker(@ ,ncdenr.gov Please visit www.nccoastalmananement.net to subscribe to Coastal Management's quarterly newsletter, the CAMAgram. E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 3:47 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (edc.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium WRC does not support pile or casing installation by vibratory hammer during the moratorium. WRC was not supportive of allowing vibratory extraction, but we were amenable due to concerns raised regarding the safety and ability to static pull. Being sympathetic to the need for some relief on the time restrictions we felt like that was a reasonable compromise. Also, we have agreed to allow casings to be installed during the moratorium by screwing them in, under an assumption that the effects will be minimal because they should be similar to what occurs inside the casing. Although this is not an unreasonable assumption, it does constitute in water work of which the affects on fish migration have not been studied. This was the second concession to the in water work moratorium. Allowing the additional in water work would further undermine the remaining conservation measures in place to protect fish migration through this area. Without reasonable justification I cannot agree to the use of vibratory installation during the in water work moratorium. NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS Travis W. Wilson Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program RECEIVED NC Wildlife Resources Commission 1718 Hwy 56 West Creedmoor, NC 27522 MAY 2 7 2014 DC:>S•VHD CITY Phone: 919-707-0370 Fax:919-528-2524 Travis. WilsoniD ncwildlife.org From: James, Amy E Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver(a)usace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawkenoaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium Hi all, I'm forwarding the memo from our design -build contractor that I sent out about two weeks ago discussing proposed in - water work allowed during the moratorium since I've only heard from Travis since then. I really need your input before the contractor commits to certain construction methods/timelines—the main takeaways from this memo are thus: • The first four proposed exceptions to work in -water during the moratorium were informally agreed upon during the design -build bid/concurrence process (work inside casings, static and vibratory pile extraction, and spudding); • The fifth proposal (casing 'screw -in') has been discussed recently and was approved by some (but not all) parties, pending other issues (acoustic monitoring); • The sixth proposal (pile installation by vibratory hammer) has not really been discussed before now (and hence, is not approved) and is mainly an issue for installing piles for temporary workbridges; • The seventh proposal (casing installation by vibratory hammer) has also not been proposed before now, though I'm not sure whether the casings will have been 'screwed in' beforehand. I know the last two proposals are for activities that generally do not receive moratorium exceptions, but I am doing due diligence and forwarding the requests to you for review. If I can go back to the contractor with some concrete feedback, I think it will help them in formulating their permit application/modification that is slated to be submitted towards the end of April. Please'reply all' since I will be out of the office all of next week. Thank you for your help and patience during this process. Amy From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver(alusace.armv.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (erlc.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium I do not recall WRC agreeing to pile installation during the moratorium by use of vibratory hammer. NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS Travis W. Wilson Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wildlife Resources Commission 1718 Hwy 56 West Creedmoor, NC 27522 Phone: 919-707-0370 tf RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2014 z DCSf-h:ifO CITY Fax:919-528-2524 Travis. W ilson@ ncwildlife.or¢ From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM To: brrad.e.shaver(cbusace.armv.mil; Hemdon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley, Karen M Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium Hi All, Attached to this email is a memo from our contractor, Stantec, that outlines in -water construction methods it would like to use during the sturgeon and/or PNA moratoriums. One of these is already explicitly stated in the LAMA permit (static pull), some have only been informally approved by resource agencies (spudding, vibratory pull, etc.) and at least two (#6 and #7) have been discussed in theory and are only proposals by the contractor at this point. This memo is an effort to reduce any 'surprises' in the permit modification process, so your comments and feedback are needed. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer them. Thanks, Amy Amy James Biologist, Project Management NCDOT, Natural Environment Section Direct 919.707-6129 aeiames@ncdot.aov Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. . RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2014 DCVb!:iDC.r y Ruiz, Melissa From: Lane, Stephen <stephen.lane@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:48 PM To: James, Amy E, Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M; Sollod, Steve Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium Hi Amy, Thanks for sending your email summarizing the contractor's proposal. The DCM has reviewed the draft proposal, and after consultation with our fisheries resource agencies and much internal discussion, we have concluded that we could agree to the first five proposed exceptions to the moratoria if officially requested in a permit modification request. DCM has also concluded that the six and seventh proposed exceptions do not appear to be appropriate for this project and would likely not receive permit approval. I hope you find this guidance helpful in formulating your anticipated permit modification request. If I may be of any further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen Lane Coastal Management Representative From: James, Amy E Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver(ulusace.armv.mil• Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk0noaa.aovl; Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium Hi all, I'm forwarding the memo from our design -build contractor that I sent out about two weeks ago discussing proposed in - water work allowed during the moratorium since I've only heard from Travis since then. I really need your input before the contractor commits to certain construction methods/timelines—the main takeaways from this memo are thus: • The first four proposed exceptions to work in -water during the moratorium were informally agreed upon during the design -build bid/concurrence process (work inside casings, static and vibratory pile extraction, and spudding); • The fifth proposal (casing 'screw -in') has been discussed recently and was approved by some (but not all) parties, pending other issues (acoustic monitoring); • The sixth proposal (pile installation by vibratory hammer) has not really been discussed before now (and hence, is not approved) and is mainly an issue for installing piles for temporary workbridges; • The seventh proposal (casing installation by vibratory hammer) has also not been proposed before now, though I'm not sure whether the casings will have been 'screwed in' beforehand. I know the last two proposals are for activities that generally do not receive moratorium exceptions, but I am doing due diligence and forwarding the requests to you for review. If I can go back to the contractor with some concrete feedback, I think it will help them in formulating their permit application/modification that is slated to be submitted towards the end of April. RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2014 DUNEDWY Please 'reply all' since I will be out of the office all of next week. Thank you for your help and patience during this process. Amy From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver(a)usace.armv.mil: Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk(&noaa.aov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium I do not recall WRC agreeing to pile installation during the moratorium by use of vibratory hammer. NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS Travis W. Wilson Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wildlife Resources Commission 1718 Hwy 56 West Creedmoor, NC 27522 Phone: 919-707-0370 Fax:919-528-2524 Travis.Wilsonifi ncwildlife.org From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM To: brad.e.shaver(cbusace.armv.mil: Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk0noaa.ci ); Rivenbark, Chris; McCauley, Karen M Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in -water work during moratorium Hi All, Attached to this email is a memo from our contractor, Stantec, that outlines in -water construction methods it would like to use during the sturgeon and/or PNA moratoriums. One of these is already explicitly stated in the CAMA permit (static pull), some have only been informally approved by resource agencies (spudding, vibratory pull, etc.) and at least two (#6 and #7) have been discussed in theory and are only proposals by the contractor at this point. This memo is an effort to reduce any'surprises' in the permit modification process, so your comments and feedback are needed. Please let -me know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer them. Thanks, Amy Amy Ja mes Biologist, Project Management NCDOT, Natural Environment Section Direct 919.707-6129 aeiamesOncdot.gov Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. RECEWW 2 MAY 2 7 2014 DUNMerry UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE a National Oceanic and Atmosphenc Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE v Swftasl Regmal (rfk 263 13Ih Averue South St Petewvq Flonda 33701 5505 h"D 'se•o nT's roa gov NOV 0 6 2013 F/SER3: EGH SER-2013-10713 Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe. Ph.D., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit State of North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Ref.: Federal Aid Project NHS-0017(68) — Brunswick River and Alligator Creek Bridge Replacements and Widening, U.S. Highway 17-74-76, Leland -Wilmington Area, Brunswick County, North Carolina Dear Dr. Thorpe: This responds to your letter dated February 25, 2013, submitted to National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). You requested concurrence from NMFS with NCDOT's findings that the proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the federally -listed shor[nose and Atlantic sturgeons. We requested additional information by e-mail on March 28, April 12, 17, 18, 29, and 30, 2013. Responses were received on March 28, April 12, 18, and 30, 2013. A conference call with the interested parties was held on May 23, 2013. NMFS requested additional information on June 5, 2013, and a response was received on July 10, 2013, at which time informal consultation was initiated. Our findings regarding the effects of the proposed action are based on the description of the action in the present informal consultation. Any changes to the proposed action may negate the findings of this consultation and may require reinitiating of consultation with NMFS. This consultation is being conducted with NCDOT as the nonfederal representative designated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), North Carolina Division (letter dated April 8, 2003), pursuant to 50 CFR 402.08. Project Location The midpoint positions of the two bridges to be replaced or widened between the neighboring cities of Leland and Wilmington are as follows: 34.234086°N, 77.985969°W, U.S. Highway 17- 74-76 bridge crossing over the Brunswick River (a tributary of the Cape Fear River); 34.234272°N, 77.979400°W, bridge crossing over Alligator Creek (a small creek off the Brunswick River) (North American Datum 1983). These bridges are approximately 30 miles upriver from the opening to the Atlantic Ocean (Figures 1-3). The U.S. Highway 17-74-76 (US 17-74-76) bridges over the Brunswick River are located at river kilometer 46.4. Figure 1 shows the project location in relation to the Cape Fear River and its distance from the Atlantic Ocean. Figure 2 shows the east -west highway (US 17-74-76) leading through the RECEIVED s' MAY 2 7 2014 • 4 DCM-MHD CITY project area, surrounding rivers, and urban development to the east and west of the project site. Figure 3 is a close-up view of the project site. Brunswick River is a tributary of the Cape Fear River. Proposed Action NCDOT proposes to replace the two -span bridge over the Brunswick River with a single -span structure carrying both travel directions, and the northbound bridge over Alligator Creek will also be replaced. The southbound bridge over Alligator Creek will be widened. Three temporary work bridges will be required to remove the existing bridge over the Brunswick River, although only one will be in place at any time. One temporary work bridge will be needed to widen the bridge over Alligator Creek. For both bridge projects, the temporary work bridges will be built using piles driven by impact hammer. The dual bridges on US 17-74-76 over Brunswick River consist of 13 spans of 60 ft with a concrete monolithic deck and a substructure of reinforced caps on piles. The new structure will carry both travel directions and consists of eight spans of 100-ft length with a 4.5-ft pre -stressed girder superstructure and a substructure of end bents on piles and reinforced caps on 4-ft drilled shafts. The final structure will be supported by seven bents consisting of seven 4-ft shafts per bent. The bridge on US 17-74-76 over Alligator Creek will consist of five spans of 50 ft with a concrete monolithic deck and a substructure of reinforced caps on piles. The new structure will consist of three 40-ft, one 45-ft, and three 40-ft with a 36-in pre -stressed girder superstructure and a substructure of integral end bents on piles and reinforced caps on 4-ft drilled shafts. The final structure will consist of six bents of six 4-ft shafts per bent. Work will be done from barges and work bridges, not causeways that would block off parts of the channel, so the river/creek area left available for rk RECEIVED z " MAY 2 7 2014 DCM_MAD CITY sturgeon passage during construction should not differ much from normal (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, April 18, 2013). The riverine/wetland impacts for the Brunswick River structure will be 0.02 ac for all permanent bents, and 0.1 ac for all temporary bents. For the Alligator Creek work, there will be 0.01 ac of impacts for all permanent bents, and 0.02 ac for all temporary bents. In=water construction activities will include spudding (i.e., anchoring barges hydraulically), removing existing piles using a vibratory hammer and/or statically (i.e., without the use of a vibratory hammer), drilling new piers using a vibratory hammer, and augering out material from hollow, driven piles. Any material removed during the augering-out process will be contained and not allowed to enter the surrounding environment. No explosives will be used. Cofferdams will not be built. Some existing pilings may be manually cut in place by divers using a diamond -cable cutting device. Bridge construction will take approximately three years. NCDOT has estimated that the duration of the vibratory driving/removing of piles will be approximately 32-48 hours per phase, spread over three phases, where one phase equates to roughly one year of work (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, May 30, 2013). US 17-74-76 highway between Leland and Wilmington. The western bridge ("Brunswick River bridge") crosses the Brunswick River just north of where it widens; the eastern bridge ("Alligator Creek bridge") crosses Alligator Creek, a small tributary of the Brunswick River, just west of where US 17-74-76 splits to the north and southeast. To protect potentially spawning Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon and other anadromous species that may be moving upriver or downriver past the site during construction. NCDOT will adhere, R6CE VED to an in -water -work moratorium from January 1 through May 31 in the Brunswick River and MAY 2 7 2014 DC,1-b!1iDCrrV Alligator Creek sites, as well as wetlands with an active connection to these two water bodies (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, July 10, 2013). NCDOT initially proposed an in -water moratorium commencing February 15, but after consultation with NMFS, moved back the moratorium startup date to accommodate NMFS's concerns over potential spawning sturgeon presence at the site in February and late January. NCDOT may extend the moratorium beyond May 31, if requested by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Division (NCWRC) and the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) to protect primary nursery areas and downstream migration of alosinel juveniles. If it becomes necessary during construction due to unexpected setbacks or delays, NCDOT will negotiate with NCWRC and NCDMF for possible exceptions to conduct unexpected, necessary work during the moratorium, such as removal of existing piles and installation of casings. In past NCDOT bridge construction projects over anadromous rivers and streams, NCDOT has negotiated on a project by project basis with NCWRC and NCDMF to complete certain types of in -water work during these moratoriums. In past North Carolina bridge construction projects with in -water moratoria, limited exceptions have been granted to the in -water -work moratorium, to allow extracting existing piles by vibratory hammer, drilling within pre -installed casings (i.e., casings installed outside the in -water work moratorium), spudding of work barges, and excavating causeway to natural ground (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, April 18, 2013). As per an agreement with NMFS, in -water work may occur during the month of January under the exception discussed above only if bubble curtains are used (to dampen underwater noise transmission), pending reinitiation of ESA consultation and approval by NMFS of the proposed in -water work method (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, September 4, 2013). However, NCDOT may install and use bubble curtains at any time during construction, i.e., year-round, without need for additional consultation or approval from NMFS (E. Hawk, pers. comm. to A. James, October 31, 2013). According to NCDOT, the original design of the project called for a temporary detour bridge to be built, and a two -span, dual bridge design (as currently exists over Alligator Creek) over the Brunswick River. The temporary detour bridge alternative was eliminated, however, to accommodate moratorium constructability concerns, and a single -span (two travel lanes in opposite directions) bridge design was adopted. These measures will effectively reduce the construction schedule by one season, and by extension, reduce potential disruption to sturgeon habitat. Use of NCDOT's best management practices for the protection of surface waters will also help minimize project effects. Floating turbidity curtains may be used around the work site if determined practicable. r Afow species: shad. herring, and alewife. NCDOT implemented a sediment and erosion control program for construction aaivities in 1970. This program requires preparing erosion control plans. implemening and maintaining standard specifications and project -special provisions. and monitoring active work sites for compliance with North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Law. Through the Post - Construction Runoff Control Program. NCDOT is implementing the Best Management Plan "toolbox" and the BMP Inspection and Maintenance programs to protect water quality and minimize post -construction impacts. The Highway Stormwater Program. established in 1998, is an NCDOT-wide initiative to protect and improve water quality while fulfilling NCDOTs missionof providing and supporting a safe and integrated transponation system that enhances the state. InD 4 1MAY 2 7 1014 DCM-MHD crry Brunswick River and its Alligator Creek tributary. Species Affected and Life History Requirements The only federally -listed species under NMFS's jurisdiction that may occur in the project area are shormose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, and the South Atlantic distinct population segment (DPS) of Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus.; Sea turtles are not expected at the project site because of its distance from the open ocean (approximately 30 river miles). Although the river is tidally influenced at the project site, there have not been any documented (by NCDMF for NMFS) sea turtle sightings that far upriver (F. Rohde, NMFS, pens. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, March 28, 2013). Therefore, we believe the project will have no effect on sea turtles. There is no NMFS-designated critical habitat in the project area. Shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon inhabit large rivers and coastal and marine habitats along the Atlantic coast and are likely present at the project site during certain times of the year. Young sturgeon primarily inhabit freshwater regions of rivers and eat a wide variety of plant and animal materials. As they get older, their tolerance to salinity increases. Juveniles rear in their natal river and estuary for several years before moving progressively seaward. The Brunswick River and Alligator Creek are tributaries of the Cape Fear River and shortnose sturgeon are known to inhabit the Cape Fear River and its tributary, the Northeast Cape Fear River. Spring (upstream) spawning migrations are believed to be triggered when water temperatures warm above 80C; from the late winter/early spring (southern rivers) to mid -to -late 3 Acfpenser is Latin for sturgeon, brevirosirum means "short beak" and oxyrinchw means -sharp nose." t RBCEMI) MAY 2 7 2014 DCM-MHDC1TY spring (northern rivers), specifically occurring in the Cape Fear River between January—March.4 Although there are few data describing the distribution and population of shortnose sturgeon within the Cape Fear River, researchers concur that a self -recruiting population of shortnose inhabits the river.5.6 Atlantic sturgeon are known to occur in the Brunswick River, as detailed below. As adults, they migrate seasonally between freshwater and mesohaline7 areas within the river, based on water temperature and salinity cues, and up the major Atlantic coast rivers to spawn. Juvenile and adult Atlantic sturgeon reside in upper estuarine habitat where they frequently congregate around the saltwater -freshwater interface. In general, residency time of young Atlantic sturgeon in estuarine areas varies from 1-6 years, before emigrating along the coast and onto the continental shelf where they grow to maturity.$ Seasonality of Sturgeon Presence in the Action Area Moser et al. [p. 33, Figures 14 and 15; p. 36; p. 401 documented shortnose sturgeon presence at or near the Brunswick River project area in February -March and May -June, and documented the capture of two gravid shonnose sturgeon females at or within 10 kilometers of the project area (one in early January 1990, the other in early February 1991). The study showed greatest shortnose sturgeon gross travel rates occur during January -March, presumably participating in spawning migrations. Moser et a]. also captured 100 Atlantic sturgeon, with Brunswick River having the highest CPUE of three areas sampled by gillnet (the other two areas were Wilmington Harbor and the upper Cape Fear River); CPUE's were highest during summer and early fall (June -September). These fish were generally captured over shoals (less than 7 m), even though the nets extended into deeper channel areas. Overall, however, shonnose and Atlantic sturgeon presence is thought to be rare in the Brunswick River and project area, with shonnose being considerably rarer than Atlantics. Recently, local North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) biologists permitted by NMFS conducted gillnet sampling in the Brunswick River and put acoustic transmitters on Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon captured there. In spite of intensive netting effort in 2012, only two shortnose sturgeon were captured from January to June 2012, a total of 26 Atlantic sturgeon and two shortnose sturgeon were captured during 27 targeted gillnet sets ranging from 1-4 hours per set. The largest Atlantic sturgeon (1.75 m) captured and tagged was in pre -spawning condition, a running -ripe male on February 22. The largest shonnose sturgeon captured/tagged (0.87 m) was a ripe female with mature oocytes visible at the incision site, on January 6. From mid -September to December a Moss. M.L and S.W. Ross. 1993. Distnbwnm and mosrmrnLs of shrcittosr sttogeon (Arif+rnsrr hntiroalmml and other anadromou hsha of the lower Cape Fear River. North Camhna. Final Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington. Nsnh Carolina. s Ross. S.W.. F.C. Roh& and D.G. Lindquist. 1988. Fidmgcmd, threatened, and our fausaof North Carolina. Pan 11..4 re-evalmtiro of thr trance and estuarine fishes. Oc ,s l Paper t4 the Ntrdt Carolina Btoh)gical Sunny 1988. 20 pp. ' Moser. M.L and S.W. Ross. 1995. Habitat use and movemems of shortnose and Atlantic sturgeons in the lower Cape Feu River. North Carolina. Transxtirrs of the Amtrncan Fishtres Society. 124: 225-234. ' Referring to estuarine water with salinity ranging 5- I8 pans per thousand (i.e.. moderately -brackish" water). 'Smith, T.U. 1985. The fishery, biology, and management of Atlantic sturgeon. Acipenser o.ryrhinchw, in North America. Environmental Biology of Fishes Vol. 14. No.1, pp. 61-72. RECEIVED 6 t MAY 2 7 2014 mmr m f'ITv 2012, seven juvenile Atlantic sturgeon were captured, ranging from 0.63-1.06 in fork length (mean: 0.86 m), during 23 gillnetting events of 14 hour duration each.9 Neither Alantic nor shormose sturgeon likely spawn at the project site, but rather spawn significantly further towards the fall line. Their historic spawning area is thought to be around Fayetteville, over 100 miles upstream. NCDENR is unaware of any observed reports of sturgeon spawning on the Cape Fear or Northeast Cape Fear Rivers (see Figure 2 for the spatial relationship of these rivers to the Brunswick River and Alligator Creek). Shormose sturgeon spawning season in the Brunswick River is unknown at the current time, since so few have been caught. It is assumed to be in the spring, as in other Southeastern rivers, but recent research indicates that it may occur in the fall, or in both seasons, and current work that NCDENR DMF is doing should answer that question for Atlantic sturgeon (F. Rohde, NMFS, pers. conun. to E. Hawk, NMFS, March 28, 2013). NCDENR DMF has captured juvenile Atlantics under 0.3 in in the river and many subadults, so they believe there is sturgeon production in the river system (C. Collier, NCDENR DMF, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, NMFS, April 29, 2013). Project Effects We have analyzed the proposed action to determine the potential routes of adverse effects to shormose and Atlantic sturgeon. Adult sturgeon en route to spawning areas upriver of the project site, and post -spawning adults and other life stages moving or returning downriver to the estuary and sea, could be affected by bridge construction by being struck by construction equipment (piles, work barges), construction -associated noise and turbidity, temporary or permanent loss of spawning/foraging/sheltering habitat, and temporary disruption of spawning/migratory behaviors. We believe shortnose sturgeon and Atlantic sturgeon are unlikely to be adversely affected by any aspects of the proposed action, and that all project effects will be discountable and/or insignificant, for the following reasons: 1. The in -water work moratorium proposed by NCDOT (January 1-May 31 of any year) prohibits in -water work when these species are most likely to be present in the project area, based on previous scientific surveys. That, coupled with their infrequent occurrence in the project areas, render the risk (that spawning sturgeon will be in the project area during construction and be affected) discountable. If necessary to conduct in -water work outside of cofferdams or caissons or drilled casings between January 1 and May 31, exceptions from the moratorium shall be limited to allowing extraction of existing piles by vibratory hammer, drilling within pre -installed casings (i.e., casings installed outside the in -water work moratorium), spudding of work barges, and excavating causeway to natural ground. If other activities are subsequently proposed during the in -water work moratorium, NCDOT shall reinitiate ESA consultation with NMFS on additional conservation measures that may be implemented if additional in -water activities are required. NCDOT may install and use bubble curtains (to reduce underwater noise transmission) at any time of the year without need for approval from NMFS: as bubble Performance Reports to NMFS by South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) for January 1-June 30 and July I -December 31. 2012. Research and Management of Endangered and Threatened Species in the Southeast: Riverine Movements of Shonnose and Atlantic Sturgeon. William Post. Tanya Darden. Douglas Peterson, Joe Hightower. Mike l.oeffer, and Chip Collier. Investigators, RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2014 M1, ni�rt,{.Trt7T1 I`PrV curtains have only beneficial effects. In -water work may occur during the month of January under the exception discussed above only if bubble curtains are used. 2. The bridges being demolished and the replacement bridges will occupy essentially the same previously -disturbed footprint, so "additional" effects to potential refuge and foraging habitat will be insignificant. 3. Operating construction machinery can physically strike and harm sturgeon. The possibility of this occurring is discountable given the species' mobility, expected avoidance behavior, and the in -water work moratorium that only allows in -water work to take place when the species are least likely to be present. Therefore, the risk of direct construction impacts (i.e., sturgeon being struck by machinery or materials) is discountable. 4. In the unlikely event they are present when unfettered in -water construction is allowed (June I -December 31), they are likely to avoid construction noise and activity (noise effects are discussed below). 5. Construction noise could disrupt spawning or injure sturgeon. As suggested by the Moser et al. study and the aforementioned 2012 SCDNR captureltagging/acoustic tracking research, gravid sturgeon or juveniles could be present during a period when in - water construction is authorized before the moratorium starts on January 1 (from mid - September to December 2012, seven Atlantic sturgeon were captured by NCDMF; and one gravid sturgeon was captured on January 6). Nonetheless, we believe the risk to these sturgeon, and especially to gravid sturgeon, during this pre -moratorium time frame from noise effects that could injure them or cause them to abort their spawning runs will be discountable because (a) of their rarity (intensive sampling in 2012 by Moser et al. and NCDENR has yielded infrequent captures of sturgeon in the Brunswick River despite intensive sampling, and the earliest recorded capture of a gravid female (a shortnose sturgeon) occurred on January 6, (b) there are alternate pathways off the Cape Fear River (tributaries and creeks) that upriver -migrating spawning sturgeon could use to circumvent the construction areas during construction (see Figure 2), and (c) vibratory driving of new piles or bridge support structures, or removal of old bridge structures, generates a continuous but low-level noise and is unlikely to cause more than noninjurious, insignificant, behavioral effects to sturgeon. The same likely holds we for underwater cutting implements (e.g., diamond cable) wielded by divers; noise levels are expected to be low and cause insignificant and discountable effects to any sturgeon that may be present nearby. 6. Impact pile driving necessary to build the temporary work bridges is likely to cause only noninjurious insignificant effects because (a) of the piling composition and substrate, (b) it will be temporary, of short duration (not more than 8 hours per day), and noncontinuous (there will be periods of quiet between periods of noise), and (c) it is unlikely to ensonify the whole river channel available to migrating or emigrating sturgeon. Additionally, there are alternate migration routes available to them. Therefore, the noise effects of impact pile driving will be insignificant. 7. Construction, particularly vibrating in bridge supports and pile driving for temporary work bridges, could negatively affect spawning sites by sedimentation effects. Sediments disturbed and turbidity generated during in -water construction will not affect sturgeon spawning habitat because there are no known spawning sites near the project site. R1iCEN6D MAY 2 7 2014 DCM-MHD C" 8. Turbidity generated during in -water construction, embankment grading, work bridge construction, etc. will have discountable effects on sturgeon foraging because of the low likelihood that they will be present due to their low densities, the in -water moratorium, and because turbidity controls (part of NCDOT's best management practices) will be used to contain disturbed sediments; therefore, this effect will be insignificant and discountable. 9. Sturgeon passage upriver and downriver could be partially blocked during construction by in -water construction, pilings, work bridges, etc. However, neither the construction process nor the completed bridges will appreciably block the river or creek nor impede or alter sturgeon passage or water flow in Brunswick River or Alligator Creek. Construction will not occur at both locations simultaneously, ensuring that there are alternate pathways available to them (Figures 2-3). Therefore, this effect will be insignificant. 10. Loud levels of intermittent or continuous construction noise from pile driving and bridge span support installation could harm sturgeon if they were close to the noise source for prolonged periods, or forced to move away from foraging habitat. However, NCDOT has estimated that the duration of the vibratory driving/removing of piles will only be approximately 32-48 hours per phase, spread over three phases, where one phase equates to roughly one year of work (A. James, NCDOT, pers. comm. to E. Hawk, May 30, 2013). In addition, in 2003, during construction of the Wilmington Bypass Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge, NCDOT conducted a study to monitor construction noise propagation into adjacent wetlands. A vibratory driver/extractor and an impact driver were tested. According to NCDOT's study, using ambient (baseline background) levels to determine a distance that this or similar construction equipment would be safe to use, the distance was found to be approximately 36 meters from the source for both the vibratory driver and impact hammer. Both the river and the creek are greater than 36 meters wide at the construction site. As well, the moratorium limits in -water construction to when sturgeon are most likely not present, sturgeon have the ability to avoid the construction area if disturbed by the noise, and there is alternate similar habitat available to them nearby (see Figure 2). Based on the above, we believe noise effects will be discountable and insignificant. 11. The project will impact only a very small portion of the available foraging habitat for shormose and Atlantic sturgeon, and these effects will be temporary, aside from the actual area of river bottom displaced by the bridge support structures (see Figures 2-3). The riverine/wedand impacts for the Brunswick River structure will be 0.02 ac for all permanent bents, and 0.1 ac for all temporary bents. For the Alligator Creek work, there will be 0.01 ac of impacts for all permanent bents, and 0.02 ac for all temporary bents. Sturgeon will still be able to forage underneath the bridges post -construction. A review of aerial images of the adjacent riverine areas using Google Earth Pro by the NMFS project biologist showed that there are miles of alternate, similar, undisturbed habitat nearby, up and downstream of the project site, where sturgeon could move to and their potential foraging would be unaffected by project activities (see Figures 2 and 3). The in - water area affected by construction is small by comparison. Therefore, project effects on foraging habitat will be insignificant. 3.' �WV�Y Y4i✓ MAY 2 7 2014 DC.ZTV. C.rN 12. Spudding of work barges outside of the moratorium will have insignificant effects on sturgeon that may be present because of their ability to move away and expected avoidance behavior if disturbed. Based on the above, NMFS believes that all effects of the proposed action are discountable or insignificant, and thus the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any life stages of shortnose sturgeon or the South Atlantic DPS of Atlantic sturgeon. Nevertheless, we recommend that bubble curtains be installed around impact pile driving operations, to the extent practicable, as this technology is known to reduce sound transmission through the water. This concludes your consultation responsibilities under the ESA for species under NMFS's purview. A new consultation must be initiated if a take occurs or new information reveals effects of the action not previously considered, or the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered, or if a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. We have enclosed additional relevant information for your review. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Hawk, consultation biologist, at (727) 551-5773 or by e-mail at Eric.Hawk@noaa.gov. Thank you for your continued cooperation in the conservation of ESA - listed species. Sincerely, A` Roy E. Crabtree, Ph.D. Regional Administrator Enc.:l. Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions (Revised March 23, 2006) 2. PCTS Access and Additional Considerations for ESA Section 7 Consultations (Revised June 11, 2013) File: 1514-22.L.1.NCDOT 10 MAY 2 7 2014 DCMMHDCI7y SEA TURTLE AND SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS The permittee shall comply with the following protected species construction conditions: a. The permittee shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of these species and the need to avoid collisions with sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. All construction personnel are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of these species. b. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or smalltooth sawfish, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. c. Siltation barriers shall be made of material in which a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish cannot become entangled, be properly secured, and be regularly monitored to avoid protected species entrapment. Barriers may not block sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish entry to or exit from designated critical habitat without prior agreement from the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division, St. Petersburg, Florida. d. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at "no wakelidle' speeds at all times while in the construction area and while in water depths where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four -foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will preferentially follow deep -water routes (e.g., marked channels) whenever possible. e. If a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within 100 yards of the active daily construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented to ensure its protection. These precautions shall include cessation of operation of any moving equipment closer than 50 feet of a sea turtle or smalhooth sawfish. Operation of any mechanical construction equipment shall cease immediately if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within a 50-ft radius of the equipment. Activities may not resume until the protected species has departed the project area of its own volition. f. Any collision with and/or injury to a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish shall be reported immediately to the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division (727-824- 5312) and the local authorized sea turtle stranding/rescue organization. g. Any special construction conditions, required of your specific project, outside these general conditions, if applicable, will be addressed in the primary consultation. Revised: March 23. 2006 �:. RECEIVER MAY 2 7 2014 DOX-ham arY POTS Access and Additional Considerations for ESA Section 7 Consultations (Revised 6-11-2013) Public Consultation Tracking System (POTS) Guidance: PCTS is a Web -based query system at https://pcts.nmfs.noaa.gov/ that allows all federal agencies (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - USACE), project managers, permit applicants, consultants, and the general public to find the current status of NMFS's Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultations which are being conducted (or have been completed) pursuant to ESA Section 7 and the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act's (MSA) Sections 305(b)2 and 305(b)(4). Basic information including access to documents is available to all. The PCTS Home Page is shown below. For USACE-permitted projects, the easiest and quickest way to look up a project's status, or review completed ESA/EFH consultations, is to click on either the "Corps Permit Query" link (top left): or, below it, click the "Find the status of a Then, from the "Corps District t)ffce' list pick the appropriate USACE district. In the "Corps Permit #" box, type in the 9-digit USACE permit number identifier, with no hyphens or letters. Simply enter the year and the permit number, joined together, using preceding zeros if necessary after the year to obtain the necessary 9-digit (no more, no less) number. For example, the USACE Jacksonville District's issued permit number SAJ-2013-0235 (LP-CMW) must be typed in as 201300235 for PCTS to run a proper search and provide complete and accurate insults. For querying permit applications submitted for ESA/EFH consultation by other USACE districts, the procedure is the same. For example, an inquiry on Mobile District's permit MVN201301412 is entered as 201301412 after selecting the Mobile District from the "Corps District Office" list. PCTS questions should be directed to Eric Hawk at Eric.Hawk@noaa.eov or (727) 551-5773. MAY 2 7 2014 EFH Recommendations: In addition to its protected species/critical habitat consultation requirements with NMFS' Protected Resources Division pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA, prior to proceeding with the proposed action the action agency must also consult with NMFS' Habitat Conservation Division (HCD) pursuant to the MSA requirements for EFH consultation (16 U.S.C. 1855 (bX2) and 50 CFR 600.905-.930, subpart K). The action agency should also ensure that the applicant understands the ESA and EFH processes; that ESA and EFH consultations are separate, distinct, and guided by different statutes, goals, and time lines for responding to the action agency; and that the action agency will (and the applicant may) receive separate consultation correspondence on NMFS letterhead from HCD regarding their concerns and/or finalizing EFH consultation. Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) Recommendations: The ESA Section 7 process does not authorize incidental takes of listed or non -listed marine mammals. If such takes may occur an incidental take authorization under MMPA Section 101 (a)(5) is necessary. Please contact NMFS' Permits, Conservation, and Education Division at (301) 713-2322 for more information regarding MMPA permitting procedures. RECEIVED MAY 2 7 m4 DCM-M" Crm See Sheet l-A , See Sheet/—B For b STATE 1FNORTH TE OOH CL]A��1[y$O1LI A DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS YY AYS BR UNS WICK AND Yg000URH Ir� � 'x � NEW HANO VER COUNTIES 0�e BEGIN If PROJECT z ` CT * Li �� �t, '', snov=m •re VICINITY MAP e7 T Q OZZ& .4 V- , A pp 0 VD 5'1 BEGIN CONSTRU nON BPE -STA. 13+11. BEGIN -Y2- 23 LOCATION. US 17-74-76 FROM THE NC 133 / SR 1472 INTERCHANGE TO THE US 421 INC 133 INTERCHANGE z TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES, 4 SIGNALS, AND SIGNING b -LMED- POT STA. 85+80.63 RK = -LLT- POT STA. 85+80.63 AH (34'LT) = I -LRT- POT STA. 85+80.63 AH (34'R7) BEGIN EXIST. BRIDGE -LLT- STq.708+9643 +E BRIDGE NO.108 (TO BE WIDENED) _ 00. 103 ai F3.00 +� �\� o� 5 6 71 -%QED- �US 17-74-76INC 133 TOWN OF BCLVE E - __ _ \� O D� 4� L� IROJECT R-3601 130+00.00 G s) ) 6 rL RECEIVED MAY 17 } I ( DCM MHD CITY SR 1352 (BATIZESIIlP RD. - n rUi IAUIT yr 1XJ rxiwjma.e m rY![Il[[Y {nc {Y8 UlYll.erl+• OVVIeULIe�eLiJ I OF LELAND AND BEUILLE.®Stantec ,' PRELIMINARY PLANS - CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. _ .9r 9. b 9Ne . AUN J - THIS IS A CONTROLLED -ACCESS PROJECT WITH ACCESS BEING LIMITED TO INTERCHANGES. suw9 Cmpm90on GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Pr6ST In E O floe of. CONSULTING HYDRAULICS ENGINEERANTEC 50 5 0 0 t ADT 2014 = 79,625 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 1.462 MI. 8011.... Pre.Ali. Read, S.it, Joe R.IN88 NC 27606 Tel. (919) 951-6966 Fe.. (919) 8SJ-7024 ....S,e....... . Hoer ADT 2035 = 107,000 LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 0.205 MI. a+.••.• xe. F-9672 of h m: sreim4Rn snacR9retmSu DHV = 11 % PLANS D = 55 % TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT R-3601 = 1.667 MI. PA SM.NANRE: :, a 10 35 0 i0 t00 T = 6 % ' V = 60 MPH ' (TTST =3%+DUAL 3%) NOTE: -LME0. &-LET- USED FOR PROTECT LENGTH. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: APRIL 24. 2014 JOSEPH T. KELVINGTON. P.E. . : o ,. q r o or ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER mot Jorcb�e PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 0 K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE LETTING DATE: JASON T. GADDY ree�� FUNC. CLASSIFICATION FREEWAY OeoJFcr OPSILN eHern�e 10 )5 10 30 NCDOT CONTACT: PROJECT ENGINEER - DESIGN BUILD GROUP DECEMBER 17. 2013 PA PROFILE (VERTICAL) S,Gvl a r PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SCHEDULE r'I PROP. APPROX. I l2"ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE ES PROP APPROX. 7"ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LES. PER SQ. YD. TYPE B25.0C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 399 LES. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE C2 S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PEA SQ. YD. IN EACH E6 B2S.6C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER I" OF TWO LAYERS. DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3- IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN S 12" N DEPTH. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE C3 AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 PLESS ER QTHAN PI TTO DEPTH BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT L2" N II 8" AGREGATE BASE COURSE DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1"IN DEPTH. G.4 PROP. APPROX. 112"ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE RI P-6" S9.5C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LES. PER SQ. YD. CONC. CURB AND GUTTER PROP. APPROX. 3- ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE C5 S9.SCAT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS.PER SQ. YD.IN EACH R2 2-6" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER. OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE C6 S9.SC AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF I12 ZBS PER SQ. VD. PER I" R3 MODIFIED 5" MONOLITHIC GONG. ISLAND (KEYED IN). DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1 F2" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 2- IN DEPTH. DI PROP. APPROX. 4- ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE 119.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LES. PER SQ. YD. R4 9" X 18" CONC. CURB. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INIERMEDL47E COURSE, D2 TYPE n9.OBAT AN DEPTH,, TO CBE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT GE RATE OF ILESS THAN 2 12" IN R 1 R5 CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED GONG. BARRIER. STD. 854.02 DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH. D3 PROP. APPROX. 3-ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, R6 2=6" X F-0" CONCRETE WALL WITH HANDRAIL TYPE 119.0CAT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LES. PER SQ. YD. PARAPET PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, D4 TYPE 119.0C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LES. PER SQ. YD. PER P' S 4" CONC SIDEWALK DEPTH, TO RE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 212" N DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH. EI PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.011, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LES. PER SQ. YD. T EARTH MATERIAL. E2 PROP. APPROX. 4 l2" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.011, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 513 LBS. PER SQ. YD. U EXISTING PAVEMENT. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE E3 B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF I14 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER I" WI VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT DEPTH TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN (SEE DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO. 1). DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5 J2" N DEPTH. E4 PROP. APPROX. 3- ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, W2 VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT TYPE B25.0C AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LBS. PER SQ. YD. (SEE DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO. 2). NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE III UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. `z I 3:1 3.7 .O`25 VAR. DEPTH U 6 �" VAR. 0" TO I 025 .0�5 SEE ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS 852.01 FOR MORE I2VFORMA770M DETAIL SHOWING MODIFIED S" MONOLITHIC CONC. ISLAND *USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO 11 . N� ® Stantec SNmecCoreWtin95erriresl e SINUUICU COfPOf8I100 R01 Frm'dn Roatl m SWe 00 NRIN91I, NO 27606 I91M(919 8 Fe I-702 Faz. (Sla) FSL]ala .w.... wtecmm Iimnse No. F-0673 FROJEa REFERENCE NO. SNF R-3601 2 RN/ SHEET NO. 0AO.Y MIGN WDRAUUC ENGINEER ENGINEER SURFACE COURSE L SURPACE COURSE INTERAEEDMM COURSE I I �" MIN IN RA MTR COURSE BASE COURSE I RASE COURSE I 2 L12 I 2 /2" 3" 3" MIN. Fgx�ISAG MIN. 3" ' DETAIL 1: METHOD OF WEDGING NO.l PLANS EXISTING PROPOSED VARIABLE I 3" GRADE I PONI I SURFACE COURSE SURFACE COURSE MINI SURFACE COURSE IN7F.RMEDMIE COURSE TNrcuxrMDi COURSE INTIIRMEDMTE COURSE BASE COCOURSE I EASE COURSE BASE COURSE EXISTING I ` 3" I ' 212" PAP.NENT 2112 MIN M MIN MIN. ExrsrmG PAE2MENP DETAIL 2: METHOD OF WEDGING NO.2 i 0 PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE Cl IY? S9.5B C2 3' S9.SB C3 VAR. DEPTH S9.5B C4 Ae' S9.SC CS 3' S9.5C C6 VAR. DEPTH S9.SC DI 4' I19.OB D2 VAR. DEPTH I19.OB D3 3' II9.0C D4 VAR. DEPTH I19.0C El 4' B25.0B E2 4Ye" B25.0B E3 VAR. DEPTH B25.0B E4 3' B25.0C ES 7" B25.00 E6 VAR. DEPTH B2S.0C ll 8'AGGREGATE BASE COURSE RI 1' 6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R2 2'-4" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R3 MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN) R4 9' X 18' CONC. CURB RS CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER, STD. 854.02 R6 2'' 6' X 1'-0' CONC. PARAPET WALL WIHANDR41L S 4' CONC. SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT WI VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I W2 VAR.DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2 NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE la UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 6:1 VARIABLE SLOPES -LMED- EDT EOT VAR. 45'-3" TO 44' 21' 21' 2'-0" TO 3'-3" i 1 1 C5 CS 12- ,0_� TO 36" -�3 R 4 1 ll 3 4 II 3 GRADE TO THIS LINE (N� ® Stantec CoraWtl�ry SeMreslnc STR'061®C9lP6fdE0t1 W"a nNoaE ,,,UBSF s , NC 9 Td pl,h Fa. (919) 961-002e U.. Na F-06TL U.. N. NOTE. L GRADE POINT TRANSITIONS FROM -LMED- STA. 42+00.00 (45'OFFSET) TO -LMED- STA. 53+00.00 (34'OFFSET) IT AND BE 2. EXISTING MEDIAN PAVED SHOULDERS TO BE REMOVED 3. ALL PAVED SHOULDERS ARE FULL DEPTH (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) 4. FOR NARROW WIDENING 4" OF B25.OB MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ABC. MEDIAN BARRIER DETAIL -LMED- STA.52+54.00 TO STA. 55+89.12 (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB) -LMED- STA. 64+36.81 (END APPROACH SLAB) TO STA. 67+45.69 L W 1 1025 I iY C5 1 .025 6' 4' I 61 61 4' 6' .02 i CS 025 G- i .025� 025 .08.- 08 L r ' GRADE TO THIS LINE LVAR. V TO 6'-7.5" VAR. 6'TO 6'-7.5" TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -LMED LT- STA.42+00.00 TO STA.55+95.76 (34'LT.) +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE) -LMED LT- STA. 63+91.03 (34'LT.) +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 85+80.63 -LMED RT- STA.42+00.00 TO STA.56+30.41 (34'RT.) +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE) -LMED RT- STA. 64+35.19 (34'RT.) +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 85+80.63 E TO LINE W NOe use VARIABLE SLOPES $HER NO. A PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE Cl A, S9.SB C2 3^ S9.511 C3 VAR DEPTH S9.SB C4 A,-S9.SC CS 3" S9.SC C6 VAR. DEPTH S9.5C DI 4" 119.011 D2 VAR. DEPTH 119.08 D3 3- I19.00 D4 VAR. DEPTH 119.00 El 4^ B25.OB E2 44," B2S.0B E3 VAR DEPTH B2S.OB E4 3" B25.00 ES 7- B25.00 E6 VAR. DEPTH B25.00 JI 8•AGGREGATE BASE COURSE RI R6"CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R2 2''6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R3 MOD. 5- MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN) R4 9- X 18" CONC. CURB R5 CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER, SID. 854.02 1?6 2'-6" X 14• CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL S 4" CONC. SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT WI VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 1) W2 VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2 NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. LLT- Stantec " `� ® EN IN 12' w siamecconzumig 6ervYca ma 24' MEDIAN ST.Wo9¢n Co`p9aliaO 691 Jones F2Amn Rm4 WiGR EXIST. Su g0 I Ha. gq NO P *a. ( 9161 &S1i666 PRE 10' 12' 72' VAR.12' 10' Fax (es91 e6t-]g24 GRN/E TO 0�l 13' WiGR U�.. N... Fmn , W --- 3 6, q• T �04 �O25 25 .02S- .02-25 .08 4:1 ---_ 67i 4 6- T VARIABLE 17" JI SLOPES GRADE TO GRADE TO THIS LINE gd THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 -LLT- STA.85+80.63 TO STA.108+96.43 +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE) -LLT- STA.111+8331 +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA.127+00.00 VARIABLE SLOPES RPAY-, RPBY-,-RPCY-, RPDY-, RPLLT- EXIST. 24'TO 62' i .m M.4x .as MAX ROLLOVER GRADE WI ♦ ROLLOVER POINT F-Y S.E. I EX. S.E. VAR. VAR. / U TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4 RPAY- STA. 16+00.00 TO STA. 27+82.65 -RPBY- STA. 11+34.50 TO STA. I5+63.72 -RPCY- STA. 13+11.90 TO STA. 15+61.90 -RPDY- STA.21+80.95 TO STA.25+79.47 •-RPLLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 42+50.00 -RPLLT- STA. 42+50.00 TO STA. 44+77.45 (1.5" OVERLAY ONLY) VAR. l3'T WGR t VARIABLE SLOPES NOTE. FOR NARROW WIDENING 4" OF B25.OB MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ABC. *• 3.1 SLOPE USED IN AREAS OF WETLANDS V, E -LRT- RPLRT- I I I 2' VAR. 24'TO I I VAR I ,TO 0' 12' VAR. 0' 10, GRADE - TG 72' POINT W 1 .025 .0 .025, .0044 GRADE TO J GRADE TO TIHS LINE THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 -LRT- STA. 85+80.63 TO STA. 109+68.50 +/- (BEGIN BRIDGE) -LRT- STA. In+53.50 +/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 130+00.00 -RPLRT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 18+50.00 VARIABLE SLOPES GRADE TO THIS r+ RPLRT- �G (LEFT TURN LANE) I 24'TO 4S' I 12 I .02 EX. S.E. I EX. S.E. 13" TYPICAL SECTION NO. S -RPLRT- STA.55+75.00 TO STA.62+25.00 VARIABLE SLOPES z O PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE Cl IV S9.5B C2 3' S9.SB C3 VAR. DEPTH S9.5B C4 ry,' S9.5C CS 3' S9.SC C6 VAR. DEPTH S9.SC DI 4' 119.0B D2 VAR. DEPTH I19.011 D3 3' 119.0C D4 VAR. DEPTH 119.00 El 4' B25.0B E2 454' BIS.OB E3 VAR. DEPTH B210B E4 3' B25.0C ES 7' B25.00 E6 VAR. DEPTH B25.00 JI S' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE RI I'-6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R2 2' 6' CONC. CURB AND GOITER R3 MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN) R4 9' X IS' CONC. CURB RS CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER, STD. 954.02 R6 2'-6" X 1'4' CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL S 4' CONC. SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT WI VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 1 W2 VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2 NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE •3 RPAYLT- RPAYRT- I I I VAR. WIDTH I 1R. 15' I VAR. 15' VAR WIDTH is, I 15' 30' TO 30.15' f f 2' C2 ueM TV :6:-j1 EXIST. 48' GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 6 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 7 AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION.' RPBYLT- STA.10+00.00 TO STA. 11+96.59 RPBYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO STA.11+81.11 RPCYLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 11+92.74 RPCYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO STA. 13+31.56 RPDYLT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 13+23.43 RPDYRT- STA.10+00.00 TO STA. 12+90.35 j -YNBL- j -YSBL- THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 8 THIS LINE PROJER UFE CE NO. SHEET NO. R-3601 2-C Stantec WW SHEET NO. 0.0 AWAY p 51GN HC5 ENGINEER GIN W ENGINEER slweocos SiWporeO CUEpoatlp0 R.d Jo Frnl9n Nona &rea Su' W 2]fip6 Tm.pl.NC PRELI RY PLANS F.J19)M14P9 F� )Bt9)951-0039 m UI U..Na. JGi2 N.. F USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.6 AT TILE FOLLOWING LOCATION -RPAYRT- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 12+81.65 -RPAYLT- STA. 10+00.60 TO STA. 11+42.89 RPBYLT- R rPBYRT- RPCYLT- L RPCYRT- RPDYLT- RPDYRT- VAR. WIDTH I TYPICAL SECTION NO. 7 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.8 AT TILE FOLLOWING LOCATION. -Y- STA. 18+20.00 TO STA. 21+14.42 PIS Sta WI vYJZ P/sm lL9tl/.9/ Pls Sto 11+86.71 P1Sto /6+9359 PIS Sta 21+44.01 P/s Sio Lit. Bs = 4'2t 34J' A = 36' 55' 593 (RT) Os = 4-W 385- A = 23. 22' 02.4' (RT) As = 2' 04' 371 Bs = 5' 03'. Ls = 280.W D = 3' 06' 50A' Ls = 280A0' D = 2' 5Y 532' Ls = 145.W Ls = 145,00' LT = 18612' L = 1.166.08' LT = 1867/' L = 815E7' LT = 96b7' LT = 967Y ST = 9338, T = 614.46' ST = 9338' T = 41359' ST = 4834' ST = 4837' R =. 1.840.W R = 2A00.W SE = 0A8 SE = 0A8 Ol OS = 70 MPH DS = 70 MPH c?) O� 41 1 Y .— .... Ls = 320A0' D = 2' ST c .. v.i .. ... 1.r .. ... 6 ..5 4' .. ... Ls = 200A0' D = 2' 4l'' s = 6'00' 082 = LT = ' L = 1J98J4' ' LT = l3.66, L = 2/3J8' L 2 ,6 ' Ls = 200D0' L = 720b9' L 1067 ST = l0673' T = ST = 66b8' T = 58' LT = T = R = 2A/OA0' 2.010 R = 2J35A0' 2) 87.45' ST = 87.45' R 955A0' .955.W SE = OD6 SE = SEE PLANS SE = 0.08 DS = 70 MPH DS = 70 MPH DS = 50 MPH C® Stantec aonsvXbp seM®+�nc SIWrot®CArptttalian 801J eola. F�aaaa ano RWelgsmm 1,NL fi (919) F. tale a5lam4 ».rd mwF „ lice�rsq No.F-0BJ2 1 No. N¢ - REFERENCE: FOR —LLT— & —LRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS 20-21 FOR—RPLLT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEET 26 �_ FOR—RPLRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEET 27 PROTECT REFFRENCE NO. SHEET NO. -RPLLT- -Y3- R-3601 12 K PI Sto 36+57.46 PIS Sto 40+1&6 Pl Sfa l4+6850 'H7 ® Stantec RN/ SHEET NO. 0= 20'46'27B'(LT) es = 3'2937P WWWAY OESIC4 HYDR.WuCS D = 3'29'37P Ls = 200,00' D = l8'59'S83' s1aN.cc00.Wl,Sery sln,, ENOLNEEF EKGNEER L = 59463' LT = 13306' L = 256A6 Slwoouo Corporzuon e01J. FRrFkU. ROaO K T = 30062' ST = 66.69, T = /3632' S. 300 K R = 164ODY R = 30/56' Rawo, NO ETSOs K Yt TA (919) 951E0ss SE =EXIST SE =EXIST K K F. (OFFR8 1-7026 • " DS = 65 MPH K N F.uNe FAE K PRELIMIN RY PLANS " w ll¢IISB NO F,06T1 W NOL VK WN.T0.VCIFON \ K K IF YC/ h K ;'J"� K 43 K ..ur.` " \. �✓._,-�__ \ �,S " : LLT- POT Sto.43+0350 - 3- POT Sta. IO+OOAO }•- " / _ _ _..ems � r.` � � ; �.^�re..ts.j.':..:�.,,�� ..,1'^r,ti�,�".,.r"^:'"'"'� ; wcons K K \ NEM NANEVER SOIL & WATEF COIJISERV 0ISjRl ,�,>'F\\t K EEGRV" CON$TRiICTiON t' fly, oB 15e4 PG 716r (({\\ K -Y3- POT�'q^T�A. I0+23.60 OW ASPHNT SHOULDER K I � BEGIN L5 { BERIA Ol1RER FROM -RR1T- STA Illop Ork!q C'RLi -RPLLT- PO� SETA. TO 40,00 LT -RPLLT- ST Sto. 4/+5/.47 ' -RPLLT- CS Sta. 39+51.47 .p - - .. 1\.�. �i� — � ... _",_ � "i I � p � _ ` ` f„J';.:^:,•.... K _ i K K K. y. FF�v vK Ol " K T �nV 'p � � � — \Lw 3 F 2s� C � _ 4 raw^ `^F 'l - ^✓,+✓"-'F'wn'��•T ✓+��'i F L F _ ` � \sours F Nth GRASS I6LAN0 F /� .a,..v- IS / F F lY \ RETNN K K \\ /// / U/B''U 115 76E r k /+�/q(B 1 // O% /SPIUAL / .....f ~� S'••J' II. RFIAT A GRACE CUT 60+46 LT 275 FO j` ' 1 SEE DUAL 12A K C. c �i \ K i' -,1 /j URE iDPEP C N~• saacS TRAFFIC DIAGRAM US 17-74-4211 26,925 NC 133 26,925 39,600 39,600 575 564 800 800 I,/50 2014 ADT 1,600 2035 ADT SR 1352 (BATTLESHIP RD.) CT;] Fe PNMED �IS-(t%INB i -MATCH EXISTING K / ) PARTIALCOACRETE— / " { ISV D TO BE REUX,, GRA5S IS G>VNU IF # K GIN CONSTRUCTION _ K J2PLRT P T STA. 55+75.00 K � uss NC K f�K K K K _ BATTLESHIP K CONNISK K " OB 6 PCC 96 96 VIF 2+50.00 JIf END CONSTRUCTION " K RPLLT-POT STA. 44.*77.45 ------ ti+1.iT\.vhrv'�W / N O'46'37.8'E � � usns)us vavaacssns/xcros ---� ��'— P -RPLRT F POT4Sta.62+3/62 PIPE /� ✓ ♦. 33PROP.Y-6R' US00 R/ /K _ MATCH ExI INGy jj \ I 1Y fib? If ^ `di5 }`� // t� \\�€ v Ir.� Y woo9s END "CONSTRUCTION K 0 LL i°V, -RPLRT- POT STA. 62+25.00 J1 PRW.Y-8 Z cc^�t " COMCCURB RPLRT- POTSh7 60+8226= K d _ -1'3- POT 5ta. 11+8550 K \ K STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA K I IL`s" K DETAIL 12A - w fp - END CONSTRUCTION K I -Y3- POB STA.13+50.00 ;lr�r ! l¢ ll �� —.— — gtf,Y]- ���: •✓✓r""""" FROM JIPEAT- STA 57+00 TO STA 60+30 LT /1` `",' " ' RPLLT— ST,A.39+51.47 TO STA.44+86.69 LT + IYATCH, TO EXISTING SHOULDER. 1,REFERENCE: FOR —RPLLT— PROFILE VIEW.SEE SHEETS 26 & 27 P j FOR—RPLRT— PROFILE V/EW,SEE SHEET 27 / K / r K SPKLLLF DI DETAIL 90 CUT W INM I. SI STMIUMID 9KE ORCH 'M+" RmM N A\ . .1 M°""° N0""" V.F D d DE D y� •cr P0.0FC) REFERENCE NO. R-3601 0.M' SHEET ® Stantec ROADWAY DESIGN FNGW DE SHEET NO, 9 NO. HEENGIN CS FNGINFE0. -LRT ' B Min D� IfL Wn D- 1'Rrvl u - SWWConsutlNB SwrrYxalnG P1 Sto 101+4622 PIS Sfa 106+78.06 El-H - x . B.xk STWmteD Co"radaD 831 Jolty* FFeNRD Rows A = 6' 57' 53.3' (LT) 65 = 0' 45' 033' D = 33' LIT = 200.00' aAr_ Su las+3r ro srR_ no+Do M1TI h -uv SIR_ RA+Do FITR�DI pA elc xreoB T.L(9R0)8516 PRELIMIN RY PLANS L = 927.49127.49' LT = 13333' \ E'7 FB..(919)B51-)0xe Do HOE MR, ED m.savrnoN T = 46432' ST = 66.67' WwW.iWhr_cOm R - 7.630A0' LIconve No. F4672 SE = 0.025 DS = 60 MPH gti gti Y �... Y * LS j"JI IF aarwa a,. •_. • � N P NWEST TWF' . I{U flE[Uwp WFUELEPD.N LINE O t FCB LMS LBL p iTI j5 C TOWNCREEI( TWP TFoIpO STI CEPCi ei DL C. ELFCixOrvF wvESl LAl10.V 1,,, OF rxS LINE.vELpS END DF pGCP- Ux a! R9 �w,� - rws LDCADUN _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _- .. � BERM � * * r,�;r�✓-r`;,\ -SHOULDER aLT-toe+re `\\\* Rr o BRIDGE 10 BRIM * f� O r H w000s * * \ Y * !'M * BEGIN BRD)G .108 323'bw—TRaviS lbx Y Lu * _ ,,,,w.*.-:..,,.,., _-- `-T'4. .iZ1ja+ I NxRRDD ! >s V 5 II-E. -LLT-STA./08+96.4 mrulu"'I - _ _ — — _ _ _ * s J iV` W r VIE, o!L sL•PVc c0xouis OW Eo / 4 _ ' {A __•`_ ___ u Ainl Arer ML T r_ r n ` _ _ _ - _ - - _ -F -ry Fv - _ _ _ _ _ __L'_ __ __ _ _ > __ _ _ __ -ti ro - T - -���r, F0: Ar6i- GGTb',6 TM'r Sit WExDEp VxOEP PFIOCE TIME HE5 Fd[IIIIIEi dL50 Lla --� _ W _ _ _ ! CDNIAWED IN SAME [4YCUL5 FI 4� ..._ Lu -LLT- .� t US A s V 15 lr v Y VS is w V XC /SJ s vFalA91E ES' '^ ` XISr. BRICG TD wl NED - W EM N F O Q F F F F F :u � LJ I I F F x'SKdAL Cllr BASF ORCH aAT-STAIN+37 TO SIR_ 110. Do LT i SEE DETNL 9A 911 t�f � LJ r0 SHOULDER BEAN GUIIE0. t;ws, -I R wP MP HOULDER M3 /JY TOY 0 ELT SrA I09+161109+P)9,®I+ MIO a1T- STA I11+91 RT So. IMMI END OF S F BAIOGE TO-LLT3ySTA 111 RIP SO IISHOLIIDE0. A* y _ �r 90 MEB{R-RI�ADGE * r {Ii F4 I h4r-I°6+n LT TO BDDGF OLNIFT COO WATER ELEV-1.33' _T1+stIHiv1711+833/ a B uP'av 1 ONIFI PROTKIfON f" (n til CLB RIP RUF OULTEI P0.0RCT N�t�eRV BAPPAP t1 CJ I:7 (� 090 '\ HGH9WF EFAM * \ �I { `""-LLT nA 11 )0 \ JCH F I = _ 0901 0 tiY pURFFWROTECTION T EL Lr9' y 11N00 0.T I I) ENDOOFER DGE TGDIif0. i .✓ ,114.0 9I -- — F -- -- F i f i ` \ .f Y( ¢ -IRT- I151 W LT J 50/P.S.TRAVSIrION I N!Y GRA11 350 S s 0 .r D90 N I11 T / q F t 90 W _ � S S �4 N �+ DS n S / us i+w / us I6 w I ^•ndln.' . A� _ =a �...r � `-ari�ikt �:Y^.'A'w-.• `RELE „z.:F, D:u.T.: ,i':0'4 •x' yam. }`; 1B.3GL-0:FG f .. _'-� ii :.ixG F4, �., y. n..,.nw.a m �i iY vt �r / M G] 5 ws V �L � W L II OF RAP _ �- —_ --, b-', •.••9 i F 4 >� 6u_ 'wC' .F3-'�'^"3ffi{ 4f-'r7 $4Vt �f% OD ID `2?:•k3fx( A:.-`c'�I.a�°.�1'rB.xGl DGPi LN'III-r _ __ ___ _ ___ _ [ _ _ -"-* re: G - I! --- -- GwTh� .. ...M� 1 FKu y * Y — �-=—�-`TP./`-"�':'_ G!�'LANE TAPER DUrSIa .. E• F _Y OOOS 9,. * *yv^- F �Vj. N ..fw SO TLJAr /NG / \ r`"'n" \ wueos M E 09 i _-('/ CL II:M RRF! I 3vF� * p I ,�'� r -- }' 90 F a ' wp005 (ENODOFFBRIDGE TOMiR�0 FIT iPROACN i .9QauNE raaysaroN * * !w * * '.\\ 1 BEGIN BRIDGE d.107 -LBZjSTA. 109+68. \ END SLAB* t' L67- STA.112+77.68 -LRT-'CS S1o.106+1139 i Y I {' BEG APP O lr* END �S ENDS I/2+53.50 S3.507Y Y * I 1 * * * -LRT= STA. I09#443 -LRT- .112 I' LRT- ST Sta. II * * * * * t Y OoI N C STATE O AOTNO ITT * • I\\ i� '\SHOULDER \HOID 0]1ERLA O TO De 0III 2TS 9m+BRIDGE \ t JJ r Y Zi Y i 3 * * * * * Y * * REFERENCE: FOR -LLT- & -LRT- PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS 19-20 s FOR -LLT- & -LRT- BRIDGE SKETCH SEE SHEET 2-G -LLT- -LRT- Pls Sto 87t1873 Pi Sto 92+77J0 Pis Sto 98+3423 PIs Sto 96+1723 PI Sto 10I+4822 As = 0' 42' 583' A = 7.02' O3.4' (LT) es = 0' 42' S83' es - 0' 45' 033' A = 657' S33' lLTI Ls = 20ODO' D = 0' 42' 583' Ls = 20OD0' Ls = 20OD0r D = 0' 45' 033' LT = 13333' L = 982J7' LT = 13333' LT = 13333' L = 927.49' ST = 6567' T = 4917O' ST = 6667' ST = 6667' T = 46432' R = 8,oww R = 7.63OD0' SE = 0D5 SE = 0D25 DS = 80+ MPH DS = 60 MPH -LLT- SC Sto. 67+8539 DETAIL BA SPECIAL GGOE M P V °RCH Mirt O� 1.0'Min RnJ Ln 0" a LT- SlA 05+80 TO RA 90+50 -LLT- STw 90+50 TO STA.91+w Q Z �r ® Stantec SIWW4T CATpOFd00D ml J. F.Ndl 00 FnNGin ROa0 3W BWb 300 AeHg0,N0143m E000 E(919) F. 19197 &81-]038 F W W n�wm Ase LH9nse Nw F4e72 PROM PEFFPFNCE NO. SHM R-3601 B PAY S"EET NO, IOMWAY OF51GN mauuc fNWNEER FNGWHA PRELIMINPCRY PLANS m nror use w wxswVrnmv I grl- 1 * * I NEW HANOVER SO& & WATER CONSERV GIST I 08 R3Q PG 776 i * * ' Y' i' * * s* * * A I -LLT- ST (Sta. 99+6756 -LLT- CS Sta. 97+6756 I x • * * L7 * fl�s.,rti,.'""'„`""""..n.:-.,,r,,.�'.:r..n;r" t;7 w�-.,.;. .rv+t.�:..'.}`",-r..''" ^- • i< L„s,t: a,. �f {`^+, p � * * * u+,>, a.. ° f * * * 1,,.,, * * * * ,t * i^^`v� ouunPPRRc N W - I`i: B `th.i ^'Y._t k V .alms 4 ("�✓'v^, f T ice.✓; Q * 2- r s _ _ _. _ _ -a, _ _ _ _ _ _ y _ _ * e x W j =SPBC14 GRADP'MEDIAN DITCH . y) µ-! w vyvf�.r'"4 * I STA DETTL-U60 TO 9*0+50 Q * i xv- j ���' RF/N OUT 3 * fA 'fiA-".v'4.. t''S,zv. "� _ u \-�. * x * L�*t^fi �* lw C SEND OF HPE� 0001 CL 0RAP W - ouTLERIP r vWxoT ErnoN _ i LLJ rIpITiti1- Q Q 00 ...............w...^_. .^"^"_-`"'_a"�,f• - _ _ F - 101 i.>d� I- - - - - - - - `EY` _ _-"^'^++.`�.....ri1, ..www............--�:':'�vi Tnc Lo QGv7 11.: `w.i�.o�•J —_—_ Q ' C.MU 3511 RS : Gi-1 t.1� LS L F�ll Lv _ dTU+y, mod. Kp5/N571W/K)6Lu ♦ Q Q F ADNT GMTE 00 00 NFDOT CPS f -WON. 84473-3 Lam — f F f FTwFlLL WTM ROWABIE THUIL REMOVE F � FILL WITH ROWABIE� _—� _v_ F _ F P F _ F 4 F MATDW F F\ F F F` -f =-• -mr; UAO GMDF N TV DTC" wuoes 'v L SIT alT- 90+50 TO 91+00 C; •o.a. V '� sfP gEruL Of, -CRT- TS * * * f�4?I CITY OFF EELYILLE CRY Of BELVILLE Q I u * Q O Q Ir 0 W� F`- !941783�f FFF Fxl� OELi ' _ NORTHWEST TWP, news 1 TOWN TWP I L E rAPER q?5/DE RIGII I s -LRT- eSC S1a. 96+83 '' * * i 9Y3'IM'E rawsmON 1 I OI * x UNKNOWN * * * * * * * * * 1 - * x * * I * I REFERENCE: FOR —LLT— & —LRT— PROFILE VIEW, SEE SHEETS 18-19 w ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION -LMED- STRUCTURES EXIST. -LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER PROP. NC 133 RIVER (RIVER ROAD) -YSBL- -I' -YNBL- 1 l MIN. 48' 5" _ 10'MIN. 1 2' 1 rs' I I I ra ! w 1 8'IO 29 I 9" 1 1 T Crfo� `0 3 ozs -ozs � .025 _ _ 02 .0: DETAIL OF —Y— UNDER US 17 BRIDGES (MINIMUM DIMENSIONS) MIN. 31 -5" 2' 1 70'MIN. ® Stantec Spnlec ConwM1N9 SVN¢al� 8Bt JOnB9 Fmnklln RwE sung h. MN9R NC ] 1 Fa(%B)fl51-]024 wxv�. �nmec¢m liana Na F-BB]] 09TV' Ens o�c0ot, yR v ✓ 7l „owi y P �i �_ ,To-Q,.F, ice:-° � � -- �--• - 17-� \ AW go jo i f,: �---. y• Ii 1 I yr 1� ? _ \ - ¢ �. 7�.���•� , I $�_ ice- �.� ;a` �• d�, 11 - �\\tj 1 � ,� '�3. 'e �`,. } �`- �—n' �.y,_;.r �..��; mar � � T i1 \ • -�, — _, ,... .6 �'^—"—'' ` �;' \ sy�{�p. � % 'rar':S� • G} sir �\ .Q �y, REFEFEM'E, FM? COME WA b ALGMY£M IHFp ffVf SEE SHEET 2-F. FWt - EO- PIMFIIE VfE SEE SHEET If. Fdt -FPN- flPNLT-,b -APRM- PFOFI(£ VIEN SEE SHEET 22 F°F-RPq'-,-PP LT-.b-FPB/NT- PWIV VlW SEE SHEET 2 FWt -RF-.-FPLTLT-d -N W- PMVIIE VIEW SEE 5HE£T 24 FOR -FPO-.-RPOYLT-.b - aP - PIA`H£ V/fl 5£E SHEET M FOR -Y2- PM U VtE SEE SHEET 2fl FOR-Y- P66`ILE VIEW SEE SHEET 2A FOF O .L Y MEMZ LWP.WO WEFGI E IIACL MMD L(8 SEE SHEETS 21 ANO 2-K ss $t � ®Sta,rcec Iff 2� l w. .'.vn nw/cvr ubn,avo vrowH Fon i_ 31R Elm— JEMSM REA/OVAL 19 PROPOSED SIGNAL LOL'ATIONS SFt I'm fvnfncs nrt) ' TRAFFIC DLIGRAM US , T0.TJ US ,T- `_ MC M LU M". T ii AOT RC LIYW Rn IF P Mfia REHMNOE NO. SHFFf NO. P R-3601 2 -I m® Stantec RM SNEET NO. gOAENG OFSIGN NMGINM FNGINFFA iNGWEER ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION SY @CCOnsWWg 53rkESInG �14hNC27 � SU ]Ib RLeM1, NO ]G98 Fec(919)E.51.1M4 PRELIMIN RY PLANS w�ix'ffiNe � IiQve Na F-0ET3 00 NOE VSC PO WY@IOVITOY -LMED- STRUCTURES EXIST. -LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER PROP. NC 133 RIVER (RIVER ROAD) *�ZA,- ~s4}•� -YSBL- L -p_ -YNBL- MIN.48'-S» i MIN.3Y-S» 10'MIN. 2' 15' l5' i 15' I IS' ]S' 2' 1 10'MIN. uax. sT 8'TO 29' i y»I 91, YE Sys A�p1Zi 1pA i Gro0ix�s I O� fok ozs _025 � -.025 _ A71- y✓-5 O'�G I � DETAIL OF -Y- UNDER US 17 BRIDGES (MINIMUM DIMENSIONS) e 1 e m� m m �.xw..N•._...,r.._ua�.��"��'.-�"` I azcrr s ,�`` yyypppo}}} � T� _-_ 1 �� c �lll I� / / All\\� •r I � �� � `�'�'a All Qzl IOU �1 /T f j _ d e `��� i w �I� C-6(,t�...% �a�" � � a; - � ".• 1\ )'t•; �i�' ' \\\ \erh�... \� O 6 ' � \ T er�amyae +so �T IY'j Z 8J aT• � .L@ �mib yJ .mJ \ OIV i� REFER£RCE. ' FOR ONE WA & AUE MW INF0.91I M SEE SX££T 2-F. FOR -WED- P9 la V/£N' SEE S U 10. / FOR -RPN RPNLT-.& -FPNFi Pfi ffl VIEM SEE SKEET 22. FOR RPBT-.-FP®'LT .& RPBTRI PAvlf£ V/EW SEE 5NEU 0.. FOR FAY-. R0.7LT .&-RfYYRJ v(NfR£ VIEM 5£E S E£T 24. FOR RPM . P MT .8 -R a@ - PW;F VILW SEE SKEET 2S FOfl 12 PR6�ll£ VILW SEE SKEET 20. FOR Y- ARM2 V/EW SEE SKEET Z FOR OETNL OF ON£RWN LYN/ONO WTERCR IINCL M AND V VE ) SEE SREETS 21 A D 2-K GPAAIIC SC ` . p � ®SLaEMec roe —�0 vnvaaavrrww.w vmmR EgOM PAVEMENT REMOVAL 19 PROPOSED SIGNAL LOCATIONS SRMnTRAFFIC DIAGRAM (V2IAGb DR) 7dW OS LJ-]0.]6 DS 1] MC DJ m Mon T } y 1�1 NC LiLDIVPR FD v SHEET NO. 2 0 PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE CI I Iva' S9.SB C2 3" S9.5B C3 VAR. DEPTH S9.SB C4 b s9.sc CS 3" S9.SC C6 VAR DEPTH S9.SC DI 4" 119.9B D2 VAR DEPTH 119.OB D3 3' 119.0C D4 VAR. DEPTH 119.00 E! 4" B25.OB E2 4Y BISOB E3 VAR. DEPTH B2S.0B E4 3" B25.0C ES 7' B25.0C E6 VAR. DEPTH B25.0C I! 8"AGGREGATE BASE COURSE RI I '�' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R2 2'-0" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R3 MOD. 5' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN) R4 9' X 18" CONC. CURB RS CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE BARRIER, STD. 854.02 116 2'' 6- X 1'4- CONC. PARAPET WALL W/HANDRAIL S 4" CONC. SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT WI VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I W2 VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2 NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1.1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. VAR. 2' l5' 15' 10'MIN. �A�O ASLO CTJON C2 _02.5 1 02. Ts T _--- 6" U I 1 GRADE TO THIS LINE 11" j -YNBL- l�l .02 � GRADE TO THIS LINE -Y- A' 12' VAR. /2'-6'I VAR V ® Stantec R- POP WAY SbNec CenSO'Senimslnu WUNI &E W00t. c.p.cm BO, Jort Foots o Road -Y- softam Raleq� NC 27809 T.t(9,9)BSlE -YSBL.- -YNBLr .Ie No. R PRE uena.Fasn m I VAR SEE PLANS l VAR. SEE PLANS I 15' 15' 15' 2' VAR I VAR I 81TO 29' 10'MIN. 91, 9., 6„ 6„ �/ GRADE j R POINT2 1 C2 2 0'E(�Ol1 i I � 02.5 .025 I .025- 02 YJY' r__-- I U 11" TYPICAL SECTION NO. 9 GRADE TO THIS LINE USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.9 AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION. yE -y -Y- STA. 21+14.42 TO STA. 26+64.62 -YSBL- GRADE tPoINT TYPICAL TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10 TO 0' I TO 0' VAR. 12'TO 0' 4' 1 i i I 4' 2 I GRAUS PoINT '= C2 I 08 `25 A25 ..025 .0_2�S "025, 0� r ---- USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. ]OAT THE 3y FOLLOWING LOCATION. 6" T S -Y- STA. 26+64.62 TO STA. 36+14.00 El 11" El GRADE TO THIS LINE * EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 3ITO 6:1 -_-_ 6i1 VAg SfiCT10K$ T W -- ll' E7 T 3 f (ll=lllc(ll VAR/ABLE $E>✓ SLOPES Ill= EXIST. 24' GRADE TO TINS LINE , TYPICAL SECTION NO. 11 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. H AT TILE FOLLOWING LOCATION. -Y- STA. 36+14.00 TO STA. 41+95.21 NO. I S EH NO. r Z 0 PREL. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE Cl 14:• S9.SB C2 3' S9.SB C3 VAR. DEPTH S9.5B C4 14." S9.SC C5 3' S9.5C C6 VAR. DEPTH S9.5C DI 4' 119.0B D2 VAR. DEPTH 119.0B D3 3' 119.0C D4 PAP -DEPTH I/9.00 El 4' B25.OB E2 4/2 B2SoB E3 VAR. DEPTH B2S.OB E4 3' B25.00 ES 7' B25.0C E6 VAR. DEPTH B25.00 Jl 8'AGGREGATE BASE COURSE RI l-6' CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R2 2-6'CONC. CURB AND GUTTER R3 MOD. S' MONOLITHIC ISLAND (KEYED IN) R4 9' X 18" CONC CURB RS CAST IN PLACE DOUBLE FACED CONE HARRIER, STD. 854.02 R6 2'-6'X P4' CONC. PARAPET WALL WIRANDRAH S 4" CONC. SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT WI VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL I WIDEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DETAIL 2 NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. -Yl- (MAIN STREET) I 1 t EX. S.E. I I EX. S.E. C/ U MILL 112" OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. REPLACE WITH 112" OF S9.5B. -YI- STA.10+00.00 TO STA.11+82.50 08 3:1 --- -- S GRADE TO THIS LINE I RAISED PLANTING ISLAND VAR. O'TO 17' 1, SEE PLANS VAR. WmTH SEE PLANS R/ R/ CI C2 T T C2 Cl EX. S.E. EX. S.E. (F}�- a El -6.4 L El U V 7" LGRADE TO THIS LINE 7" DETAIL TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION W/TYPICAL SECTION NO 14 -Y3- STA. 12+65.00 TO STA. 12+12.00 -Y3- STA.11+00.00 TO STA.11+38.00 OFFSET CUL-DE-SAC .02- I GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO.12 r, j-Y2- (BLACKWELL ROAD) I R. VAR. 6' 'TANS SEE PLANS EXIST. 36' 2 I GRADS I POINT W2 I 2 C2 I 02 02 08 T (N� ®Stantec CauuNng beM¢aln< $TRbOrtn C019gOB0Il 20Jaw FrzN&n Roa4 lJ. W SNh 22404 Telepli s ((919)01-7 4 Fmc (9t B)851-]ON F Wxv.5t9ihC1'Ali uceosaNa F-0fi]2 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.12 AT THE _=y FOLLOWING LOCATION: -YI- STA.12+63.00 TO STA.14+40.00 GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO 13 -Y3- (BATTLESHIP ROAD) I 1 I t C2 � L U EI U EXIST. 27'6" TO 63' GRADE TO THIS LINE) TYPICAL SECTION NO.14 VARIABLE SLOPES USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.13 AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: -Y2- STA.23+00.00 TO STA.24+16.09 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.14 AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION]: -Y3- STA.10+23.60 TO STA.13+50.00 I v SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT WIDTH TO BRIDGE WIDTH RELATIONSHIP vvl® Stantec S1anJ C n9R Wxslx SIWOOfm COIPORII00 F. RoaO sd1 3waFranUm E WS00 Ral(glq)gh Cl1 Tel (019) Faz (9191951-]02F IBM w.�w. unrecom llmrce No.F-0Slt PEOhR Ryi CE R-360I WW SHEET ENG° EM PRE LIMI? RY PLANSI . N VY i tONSIRVCT V BRIDGE NO.103 HSTL BEGIN- RIDG +I.00 +F- END BRIDGE . -LMED- STA. 60+13.00 +f q BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -LMED- STA. SS+8912 +/- o d END APPROACH SLAB + o l + + a A I c9wu 950 na h l i e o � o $ —N ^ - n a ME o-n- oIII_ z _----------------- --- Q o C� MF-fn� PROP. SBG MF 111 \ 1�s PROP. SBG \ \\' NOTE: SEE SHEETS 5 & 6 FOR PLAN VIEW SEE SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR PROFILE -LMED- PROFILE SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR -LMED- OVER BRUNSWICK RIVER BRIDGE N0.107 a END � LErvE o-n + END BRIDGE -LRT- STA. 112+5350 +/- BEGIN BRIDGE -LRT- STA. 109+68. 0 +F 4 PROP. SBG y PROP. SBG ` J PE III / T9F In r T- o � ocomc H so na 4 ME m / ME I c PROP . SBG PROP . SBG o END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN APPROACH SLAB N07E: SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLAN VIEW -LRT- STA.1o9+C433 +/- SHEET 19 & 20 FOR -LRT- PROFILE SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR -LRT- OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK BRIDGE NO.108 (TO BE WIDENED) END BRIDGE c -LLT- STA. Ill+8331 +f Z i m'y a, EYPE o-n a a GMU 350 X. aT- «� O a \ PROP. SBG BEGIN BRIDGE -ELT- STA. 108+96.43 +F NOTE: SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLAN VIEW SEE SHEET 19 & 20 FOR -LLT- PROFILE SKETCH SHOWING PAVEMENT /BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP FOR -LET- OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK NO. I 4 m NO. W STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTIONS LMED- STRUCTURE -LMED- US 17-74-76 OVER BRUNSWICK RIVER F,-LMED- 3. 3^ 67' o1' 10' 12' 12' 1.1 21' L' 12' 1 1'1 12' 10' 1 1 01 i0.62i i LLL �a (73) G�iaPo 34' 34' -LLT- STRUCTURE -LLT- US 17-7¢76 OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK -LLT- Esif(ing 4T3, Guardrail Re"fu 1 1 EXIST EXIST EXIST L---- STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION NO.2 BRIDGE NO.108 (MINIMUM DIMENSIONS) STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION BRIDGE NO.103 (MINIMUM DIMENSIONS) c sCwa oo(pmti6n ® Stantec FNud 8013mefWU Nc 0 FZJ9n PoaE maum h. Fade('' NC l )06 me F .((919)81-7U Fa.(a .. x N..F m Li��rse Na. F� DESIGN DATA -LHED, -LLT- & -LRT- ADT 2914 = 79,625 ADT 2035 = 107,000 D = 55% DRV = R% TTST = 3% DUAL = 3% V = 60 MPH FUNC CLASS. - FREEWADEXP. -LRT- STRUCTURE -LRT- US 17-74-76 OVER ALLIGATOR CREEK **ADDITIONAL BRIDGE OFFSET WIDTH REQUIRED FOR STAGE CONSTRUCTION -LRT- n• 14' 12' 12' 12' 12' 10' E i i ! i 2i STRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION NO.3 BRIDGE NO.107 (MINIMUM DIMENSIONS) NOTE: STAGE CONSTRUCTION (MAINTAIN TRAFFIC ON -SITE WHILE REPLACING BRH)GE NO.107)