CAMA & Comprehensive LUP 2022

E CARTERET
OF GAPE LN
OA0)74 CAik0V
Adopted by the Cape Carteret Boll.of Missio -
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission on N
_ l �
October 10, 2022
3er 14, 2022

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

2 CAPE 0
F
0 p m
r ti
yCRTN c AaC�`�Q
Acknowledgements
Mayor
Will Baker
Board of Commissioners
Jeff Waters
Steve Martin
Mike King
Jim Nalitz
Don Miller
Planning Board
Susan Hall (Chair)
Neil Fitzpatrick
Cameron Watts
Paxon Holz
Bruce Williamson
Sarah Wax
Citizen Steering Committee
Dave Fowler
Charlie Evans
Susan Hall
Bubba McLean
Chris Kalt
Courtney Barnhill
Vaughan Branch
Town Manager
Zachary Steffey
Town Staff
Mike Bishop
Heather Leffingwell
Barbara Owens
Prepared by: Summit Design and Engineering

a
3 _
LL._ } -
�„ .,x' y' ,•+.. ��• - �� k Its 4' .� �a £i' •'ir 5z�' � •a .� F t.' ���{ '' +.,t,•i �' err.' �". J-; +1' • .. 4'
y '•f, . _a, •'f, •� .+. - T'�'��'�' bL. #'•yip '' r 1 , .- •�
.44�r' i-1 `. 1' i + •5' .: f�.'
1���'r '�"�{�'• _4. •,. � � 4';y '�.5 � '{' L v-�'i,Lq��-�t_+i�'. v'" •y n^•.k� ''f. LL, �. � Y'- � y � , ' e,'' '�a,y'+,h ',S
L + .. 4 -.i L"ir'r `. i �•.i'�''�' i� +},� � _ _i•.. "i't�r. ;,. :..y 'pit-_ �4'�''2' '� ' ''f ' •i i• �
mo
�F`+, ~ Lam'.'. 1+ ..• .

Executive Summary
This plan is crafted to satisfy the objectives and criteria of both the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) Land Use Planning Requirements (15A NCAC 07B.0701)
and the elements of a comprehensive plan as required by NCGS Chapter 160D-501.
It is based on a community vision and includes elements ranging from a visionary
future land use scenario to strategies to mitigate future storm events and protect
water quality as well as human life and property. The Plan will act as a guide for
land use decision -making and funding priorities over a twenty year time horizon.
CAMA regulations require that land use plans are updated every five years. Cape
Carteret's last CAMA plan was adopted in February 2007.
The goals of this land use plan are to:
• Ensure that future development is in alignment with community vision and
does no harm to the natural environment.
• Ensure that Cape Carteret reaches its best and brightest future.
• Create alignment among community stakeholders about goals and
expectations.
• Ensure that the Town is prepared for future weather events of increased
intensity.
• Create a better understanding of the land use planning process.
• Create a document that is accessible and usable by all stakeholders.
Amendments
The Cape Carteret CAMA and Comprehensive Plan was adopted on March 14, 2022.
The Plan was certified by the Coastal Resources Commission on June, 8 2022.
Any amendments to the Plan will be listed in a table below and the accompanying
superseding text will be shown with a strikethrough.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 5

Overview of the Plan........................................................................ 12
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................... 14
1.1 What is a comprehensive plan? ................................................ 16
1.2 Why do we need a plan?......................................................... 16
1.3 What is CAMA?...................................................................... 16
1.4 What is 160D?....................................................................... 16
1.5 What does it accomplish?........................................................ 16
1.6 How was it developed?........................................................... 17
1.7 How does this plan work? ........................................................ 17
1.8 Regional setting and context ................................................... 17
1.9 Historical context................................................................... 19
1.10 Coastal Areas...................................................................... 21
1.11 Vision Statement.................................................................. 21
1.12 How does this align with the 2014 Strategic Plan? .................... 21
CONCEPTUAL IDEAS....................................................................... 22
2. COMMUNITY PROFILE................................................................. 24
2.1 Introduction.......................................................................... 26
2.1.1 Significant existing and emerging conditions ....................... 26
2.1.2 Key issues...................................................................... 26
2.1.3 Public Engagement.......................................................... 27
2.1.4 Community Concerns and Aspirations ................................ 30
2.1.5 Vision Statement............................................................ 33
2.2 Existing and Emerging Conditions ............................................ 34
2.3.1 Permanent Population Characteristics ................................. 35
2.3.1-1 Age Characteristics....................................................... 35
2.3.1-2 Population by Sex .................................................... 35
2.3.1-3 Population by Racial Characteristics ............................ 36
2.3.1-4 Vital Statistics......................................................... 37
2.3.1-5 Education Characteristics .......................................... 37
2.3.1-6 Permanent Population Characteristics ......................... 38
2.3.1-7 Veteran Population ................................................... 38
2.3.2 Seasonal population........................................................ 39
2.3.3 Population Growth and Projections .................................... 39
6 � `

2.4.1 Housing Characteristics.................................................... 43
2.4.1-1 Tenure.................................................................... 43
2.4.1-2 Occupancy Status .................................................... 43
2.4.2 Current Housing Stock ..................................................... 44
2.4.2-1 Building Permit Activity ............................................. 44
2.4.2-2 Median Home Value .................................................. 44
2.5.1 Labor Force.................................................................... 45
2.5.2 Employment by Industry .................................................. 46
2.5.2-1 Military Employment ................................................. 46
2.5.3 Income Characteristics.................................................... 47
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS.............................................................. 48
3.1 Introduction.......................................................................... 50
3.2 Natural Systems.................................................................... 50
3.2.1 Areas of Environmental Concern ....................................... 50
3.2.2 Soil Characteristics.......................................................... 52
3.2.3 Water Quality Classifications ............................................. 55
3.2.4 Flood and Other Natural Hazard Areas ............................... 58
3.2.5 Storm Surge Areas.......................................................... 62
3.2.6 Inlet Hazard Areas.......................................................... 64
3.2.7 Non -coastal Wetlands...................................................... 64
3.2.8 Water Supply Watersheds ................................................ 64
3.2.9 Primary Nursery Areas ..................................................... 64
3.2.10 Other Environmentally Fragile Areas ................................ 66
3.3 Environmental Conditions........................................................ 70
3.3.1 Water Quality Assessment ................................................ 70
3.3.1-1 Surface Water Quality ............................................... 71
3.3.1-2 Shellfishing Waters ................................................... 72
3.3.1-3 Areas with Water Quality Issues ................................. 73
3.3.2 Natural Hazards.............................................................. 74
3.3.2-1 Flood Zones............................................................ 74
3.3.2-2 Storm Surge Inundation ........................................... 74
3.3.2-3 Areas Experiencing Significant Shoreline Erosion ........... 74
3.3.3 Natural Resources........................................................... 75
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 7

:
3.3.3-1 Environmentally Fragile Areas .................................... 75
3.3.3-2 Areas with Incompatible Development ........................ 75
3.4 Existing Land Use.................................................................. 76
3.4.1 Land Use Classifications................................................... 76
3.4.2 Land Use Patterns within Watersheds ................................. 79
3.4.3 Description of Existing Land Uses ...................................... 79
3.4.3-1 Residential.............................................................. 80
3.4.3-2 Commercial............................................................. 80
3.4.3-3 Governmental / Institutional / Community Facilities ...... 80
3.4.3-4 Golf Course............................................................. 80
3.4.3-5 Churches/Cemeteries/Lodges.................................... 80
3.4.3-6 Utilities................................................................... 81
3.4.3-7 Undeveloped / Forestland.......................................... 81
3.4.3-8 Marshland............................................................... 81
3.4.3-9 Water..................................................................... 81
3.4.4 Historic, Cultural and Scenic Areas .................................... 81
3.4.5 Development Trends and Future Land Needs ....................... 81
3.5 Community Facilities.............................................................. 83
3.5.1 Water System................................................................. 83
3.5.2 Wastewater Treatment Systems ........................................ 85
3.5.3 Stormwater System........................................................ 87
3.5.4 Transportation System ..................................................... 89
3.5.4-1 Planned and Programmed Roadway Improvements....... 89
3.5.4-2 NCDOT Functional Classifications ................................ 91
3.5.4-3 Major Streets with Capacity and other Deficiencies ....... 93
3.5.4-4 Traffic Volumes........................................................ 93
3.5.4-5 Impact of Existing Transportation Facilities on Land Use 93
3.5.5 Parks, Recreation and Open Space .................................... 95
3.5.5-1 Public Water/Access Boat Launch ............................... 95
3.5.5-2 Parks and Open Space .............................................. 95
3.5.6 Historic Properties............................................................... 95
3.5.7 Police & EMS Services.......................................................... 97
3.5.8 Schools.............................................................................. 97
of oAPE Qq
o m
r -i
2�RTH cAR��`�P

Land Use Suitability......................................................................... 99
3.6 Land Use Suitibility Analysis .................................................... 99
3.6.1 Vacant Land by Zoning .................................................... 99
3.6.2 Acreage of Vacant Land ................................................... 99
3.6.3 Vacant Land Suitable for Development Based on Environmental 99
3.7 Analysis of Current Land Use Plan ............................................ 99
3.7.1 Consistency of Existing Ordinances with the Current Land Use
PlanPolicies......................................................................... 102
3.7.2 Adoption of the Current Implementation Measures ............ 102
3.7.3 Effectiveness of the Current Policies ................................. 102
4. LAND USE PLAN MANAGEMENT .................................................. 104
4.1 Introduction........................................................................ 106
4.2 Public Access....................................................................... 107
4.3 Land Use Compatibility......................................................... 108
4.4 Infrastructure Carrying Capacity ............................................ 110
4.5 Natural Hazard Areas........................................................... 111
4.6.Water Quality...................................................................... 112
4.7 Transportation..................................................................... 114
4.8 Housing.............................................................................. 116
4.9 Community Facilities............................................................ 117
4.10 Economic Development....................................................... 118
5. FUTURE LAND USE AND CONCEPTUAL IDEAS ............................. 120
5.1 Future Land Use Categories ................................................... 122
Protectthe Town........................................................................... 124
DirectDensity............................................................................... 126
Walkable Main Street..................................................................... 128
Multi -Use Path............................................................................... 132
6. GOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION.................................................. 134
6.1 Introduction........................................................................ 136
6.2 Guide for Land Use Decision Making ....................................... 136
6.3 Continuing Planning Projects ................................................. 136
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 9

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1: Population By Age 2010-2019
Page 35
Figure 2: Population By Sex
Page 35
Figure 3: % Male/Female Population By Age
Page 36
Figure 4: Population by Race
Page 36
Figure 5: Birth, Death & Natural Increase Rate 2015-2019
Page 37
Figure 6: Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over
Page 37
Figure 7: Current Permanent Population Growth 1990-2020
Page 38
Figure 8: Veteran Population
Page 38
Figure 9: Seasonal Population Growth
Page 39
Figure 10: Carteret County Population Growth 2010-2020
Page 39
Figure 11: Regional Population Growth 1980-2019
Page 40
Figure 12: Proj. Population Growth for Carteret County 2020-2050
Page 41
Figure 13: Proj. Population Growth for Cape Carteret 2020-2050
Page 41
Figure 14: Occupancy By Tenure
Page 43
Figure 15: Occupancy Status
Page 43
Figure 16: Housing Units By Type
Page 43
Figure 17: Single Family Residential Building Permits over 5 Years
Page 44
Figure 18: Median Housing Value
Page 44
Figure 19: % of Persons Over Age 16 Not in Labor Force
Page 45
Figure 20: Employment By Industry
Page 46
Figure 21: Per Capita Income & Median Household Income
Page 47
Figure 22: Enrollment in White Oak Middle School 2009-2021
Page 97
Table 1: Soils in Cape Carteret Planning Jurisdiction Page 54
Table 2: North Carolina Water Quality Classifications Page 56-57
Table 3: Description of Hurricane Categories Page 62
Table 4: Storm Surge Flooding Page 62
Table 5: White Oak Subbasin Page 70
Table 6: Existing Land Use By Type and Acreage Page 76
Table 7: Road Capacity/2040 Estimates within Town Page 93
Table 8: Cape Carteret Public Schools Average Daily Membership Page 97
10

LIST OF MAPS
RegionalContext............................................................................. 18
ExistingWetlands............................................................................
51
Existing Soils Classifications..............................................................
53
Environmental Constraints - FEMA Flood Zones ....................................
59
Environmental Constraints - Areas of Frequent Flooding ........................
60
Environmental Constraints - Elevation Changes with Areas of Flooding ....
61
Category 1-5 Storm Surge/SLOSH Map ...............................................
63
Fish Nursery Areas..........................................................................
65
Natural Heritage Protection Areas ......................................................
67
Areas of Biodiversity........................................................................
69
ExistingLand Use............................................................................
77
ExisitingZoning Map........................................................................
82
Water Service Area..........................................................................
84
Wastewater Service Area..................................................................
86
Stormwater System.........................................................................
88
Functional Classifications..................................................................
92
Road Deficiencies............................................................................
94
Town Parks/Boat Landings................................................................
96
Vacant Land By Zoning....................................................................100
Vacant Land By Acreage..................................................................101
FutureLand Use.............................................................................123
FutureDensity Map.........................................................................127
Walkable Main Street.......................................................................129
Existing and Proposed Multi -Use Path................................................133
APPENDICIES
Appendix A: Matrix of Required Elements...........................................142
Appendix B: Vision Statements.........................................................148
Appendix C: Survey Results Summary...............................................149
Appendix D: Green Stormwater Infrastructure....................................150
Appendix E: SLOSH Maps (Categories 1-5 Storm Surge/SLOSH).............151
Appendix F: Main Street/Town Center Concept....................................157
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 11

Overview of the Plan
This plan is crafted to meet both the requirements of the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) and the Comprehensive Plan requirement of NCGS Chapter 160D.
Readers accustomed to reading land use plans will find that it is a hybrid of typical
CAMA and Comprehensive Plans.
Required elements of a land use plan are outlined in CAMA's Land Use Planning
Requirements (15A NCAC 07B.0701), and this plan is organized to adhere to that
format. In addition to the recommendations required by CAMA about Public Access,
Land Use Compatibility, Infrastructure Carrying Capacity, Natural Hazard Areas, and
Water Quality, there are additional recommendations about Housing and Economic
Development, which are common in comprehensive plans. Transportation,
Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater are all included in the Community Facilities
recommendations, per the CAMA outline.
Beyond the required elements, this plan is a manifestation of the community's
vision for the future and a pathway to reach that vision. It will act as a guide for
land use decisions and funding priorities and a reference for all Town stakeholders,
from elected and appointed officials to property owners, residents and potential
developers. Close adherence to this plan (and its future updates) will ensure that
Cape Carteret continues to be a great place to live, work, and visit, and evolves to
be even better.
The diagram on the facing page depicts the relationships between CAMA, NCGS
Chapter 160D, the Town's development regulations (Unified Development Ordinance
or UDO), and life in Cape Carteret.
12

WHAT'S THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE LAW, THE LAND USE PLAN, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
ORDINANCE, AND REAL LIFE IN CAPE CARTERET?
Chapter 160D
of NC General
Statutes
a
a�
a a
'C U
G °
a �o
F•��h
art a 2
ooc��e��S .�a'�
Cosa\
Pub/ic/Stakeholder
input
eCaC�eCe�
Water quality, economic
development, tourism,
flooding, sewer, traffic
Unified `
Development
Ordinance
(Zoning + Storm water
+ Planning Board +
Development Processes)
® Counties Subject to CAMA
= Counties Subject to 160D
s4
l0 00 �-
74 %O„ o°
c",20 �p'f0a�i
7� 7s Wf
XO 0
Coastal Area
Management Act
(CAMA)
Ilk
Development
Process
Affects funding
decisions on local, state
and federal levels
Must fit with
future land use
designation I
SUMMIT
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 What is a comprehensive plan? 16
1.2 Why do we need a plan? 16
1.3 What is CAMA? 16
1.4 What is 160D? 16
1.5 What does it accomplish? 16
1.6 How was it developed? 17
1.7 How does this plan work? 17
1.8 Regional setting and context 17
1.9 Historical context 19
1.10 Coastal Areas 21
1.11 Vision Statement 21
1.12 How does this align with the 2014 Strategic Plan? 21
14 `

�► r'=' ;: ," � �'� ��� `'% ; ,, fir( ;: ;�
Yam.. IIF .:a+ti ''� * �'' - f1'=A' fui:'�...=YF:►i� 3 - �- _i�1 -.
,�, `' , '7R ,� �- ` - ��� 1,.`'y(��y� �r''; "� >�: v '"• ,ems :�;`'� '••-,�
1 -•
T
• �.. • �y��'".-�.il'tr:�� •(SLR' _ _
i
�s
4pr OWN
iv
IdT
AN
.._..� AP
i
lip
elcome to the
Cape Carteret Community ParkIlk
.
't
h

1.1 What is a comprehensive plan?
The Comprehensive Plan is a long range guiding policy document for Cape Carteret
to use in its decision -making about land use, transportation, and a variety of other
topics related to public interests in the built environment and quality of life in the
community over the next approximately twenty years. However, this document
is not set in stone once adopted. This plan is to be reviewed to determine if it
needs updating, making it a "living" document that is subject to change over time
depending on shifts, new trends, or desired changes in goals and objectives.
1.2 Why do we need a plan?
The previous Town "Core Land Use Plan" was adopted on February 19, 2007. Since
this time, new regional growth, flooding, and other issues have impacted the Town.
While plans are guiding documents, they are to be continually updated. Additionally,
the North Carolina State legislature has required that all localities maintain a
comprehensive plan in order to enact Zoning laws (explained later in this chapter).
Without planning documents, it is difficult to justify or even make decisions
regarding the Town's growth and development. Unplanned development can lead to
conflicts and diminished quality of life.
1.3 What is CAMA?
The Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) was passed by the North Carolina
General Assembly in 1974 to protect the state's coastal areas. Cape Carteret is
required by the law, as a coastal community, to include additional information
related to the environment and land use, as well as have the plan certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environmental quality for compliance. This plan has
been crafted to meet the CAMA requirements.
1.4 What is 160D?
Chapter 160D is legislation passed in 2020 by the North Carolina General Assembly
that requires all localities in the state to draft a comprehensive plan in order to
comply with 160D. Without a comprehensive plan, localities may no longer enact
their zoning laws. In addition to all of the aforementioned reasons it is a good idea
to have an up-to-date comprehensive plan, the state now requires it. This plan has
been crafted to meet the comprehensive plan requirements of Chapter 160D.
1.5 What does the plan accomplish?
The Comprehensive Plan accomplishes a common goal for the community to align
its decisions with. Actively used comprehensive plans can build expectations and
trust between the community, developers, and local leaders and achieve a higher
quality of life for the community by addressing its problems collectively.
16
OF CAPE C9
3 A
O m
F -1
4-
0�TH C

1.6 How was it developed?
The plan is a distillation of public input and visioning, input from elected and
appointed officials, public agencies, and consultant recommendations to develop
into a common vision for the future of the Town including what shape development
may take, and what improvements are needed. That input is then weighed with
demographic and environmental data to make realistic recommendations for the
Town's future.
1.7 How does this plan work?
For Residents: Community members can utilize the plan to understand the
direction the Town intends to pursue, giving input and feedback as necessary. The
Comprehensive Plan works as an active document that encourages people to get
involved.
For the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners: The plan will give guiding
policies to evaluate land use and transportation decisions related to land
development applications.
For the Town government: The plan helps set priorities for capital investment and
for managing growth and development in the Town.
For developers: The plan gives clear expectations on what the Town's vision for the
future is and what kinds of development may more easily move through the land
development application process.
1.8 Regional setting and context
To understand Cape Carteret, it is important to understand the Town's location
within the greater regional context. Cape Carteret is one of 11 incorporated towns
in Carteret County. The Town offers an attractive location on Bogue Sound with
good schools and land available for future growth. The relationship with other
nearby tourist destinations including Emerald Isle and other Bogue Banks beach
communities is essential to understanding Cape Carteret.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 17

i
ralmin
Town of Cape Carteret
I
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survev, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
In.

1.9 Historical context
In 1954, a group of developers purchased twelve miles of land at the western end
of Bogue Bank from Anita Fort Maulick. That property would become the Town
of Emerald Isle. One of those developers, William Britton McLean also purchased
property on the mainland from Mrs. Maulick, which extended from Highway 24 to
the Bogue Sound. Additional land purchases followed to create Cape Carteret, which
today has a total area of 2.7 square miles. The Town's main thoroughfare is W.B.
McLean Drive, named in recognition of Mr. McLean after his death in 1986.
In 1957, Mr. McLean recorded the first subdivision in the southeast portion of town
as Bayshore Park. In 1958, he recorded 'old' Cape Carteret which extended from
Anita Forte Drive to Highway 58. The "e" on Forte was a mistake on the map and
was never corrected. The two most recent subdivisions are Star Hill North, which
is nestled along the Croatan National Forest and Ardan Oaks near the Western
Carteret Public Library. Both were developed in 2005. The Town of Cape Carteret
was officially incorporated in 1959 and soon after, the Cape Carteret Police
Department was established.
In 1961, the State of North Carolina began a daily ferry service between Bayshore
Park and Emerald Isle. The ferry service continued until the completion of the B.
Cameron Langston Bridge in 1971. Old Ferry Park on LeJeune Road, dedicated
in 2021, marks the location of the original ferry. White Oak Elementary School
opened in 1964 and has undergone significant expansions to meet the communities'
growing population, its most recent in 2017. In 1968, McLean and his partners,
George Fulton Spell and William Arthur Shackelford Jr. opened Star Hill Golf and
Country Club. The Star Hill and Country Club Point subdivisions surround the
golf course. The name Star Hill is derived from local folklore that claims a meteor
came crashing to Earth some thousands of years ago, carving out a lake as well
as pushing the earth up into a thirty-foot mound that the locals would come to call
Star Hill.
In 1973, McLean began developing the shopping center near the intersection of
North Carolina Highways 24 and 58. The Carteret Crossing Shopping Center now
includes an upscale supermarket, drug stores and a bank, as well as several restau-
rants and specialty shops. The shopping center also includes a doctor's office, an
optician, an audiology specialist, and a veterinary office. Lowes Home Improvement
opened in 2007 and sits adjacent to the shopping center. By 1974 the town had ad-
opted zoning regulations that largely remain in effect today. In 2021, the Board of
Commissioners adopted a Unified Development Ordinance in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 160D.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 19

Historical context (Continued)
Cape Carteret is an active community for all ages. In 1998, Golfin' Dolphin
opened behind the shopping center followed by MacDaddy's in 2008. This family
entertainment complex now includes a driving range, miniature golf, sky trail,
bowling alley and arcade. Also in 1998, a gym and aquatics center opened on
Taylor Notion Road and in 2003 the Western Carteret Public Library opened nearby.
Cape Carteret is home to several churches and exceptional preschools. The Town
hosts a number of festivals throughout the year including the annual Crystal Coast
Watermelon Festival. The Sounds on the Sound concert series and Movies In the
Park draw families from the surrounding communities. Each Thanksgiving morning,
the Turkey Trot 5K Run brings hundreds of runners to Cape Carteret. Through the
hard work and diligence of the community, Cape Carteret has an uninterrupted
walking and biking trail that extends from the public library on Taylor Notion Road,
down to the intersection at Highway 24 and continues along the entire length of
Cape Carteret on W.B. McLean Drive (Hwy 24) to the shopping center. The Town
plans to extend the trail into a five kilometer closed loop.
From the beginning, recreation in Cape Carteret has always centered on the
beautiful waters of Bogue Sound. Among the Town's thirteen parks, nine are sound
front and include a public boat ramp, fishing piers, and picnic areas. In 2021, a
new kayak park opened on Pettiford Creek, a tributary to the White Oak River.
It accommodates twenty vehicles and has a concrete sidewalk to the launches.
Paddlers can enjoy miles of unspoiled shoreline teeming with wildlife including
manatees, alligators, deer, and cranes. The Town of Cape Carteret is committed
to safeguarding our natural resources and maintaining the living landscape on the
water, along the shoreline and inland. As a result of those efforts, Cape Carteret has
been recognized as a Bird Sanctuary and a Bee City, USA.
20
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

1.10 Coastal Areas
North Carolina's coastal communities are an essential part of the State's identity,
economy, future. These coastal areas are also the most vulnerable to increased
weather events. In order to maintain a healthy environment, a safe place for
people to live, and a healthy tourism economy, good planning and prompt plan
implementation is necessary to guide communities toward the best possible future.
1.11 Vision Statement
The "Vision Statement" is a distilled message from community input about the
future. This statement acts as an overall goal to be achieved and is intended to be
aspirational. The vision is as follows:
"In 2045, Cape Carteret is a model for resiliency, sustainable growth and
development in a changing environment. By developing a well -designed, mixed -
use Town Center to support local businesses and provide an anchor for the local
community, the County, and seasonal visitors, the community will see only minor
disruption from storm events and the resilient built environment will recover quickly
from major storm events as a result of its compact design and careful planning. The
Town will be an ideal place for residents of all ages to thrive, offering walking and
biking to daily activities."
1.12 How does this align with the 2014 Strategic Plan?
In 2014, the Town created a draft strategic plan to prepare itself for the future.
Though not adopted, the document has influenced the creation of this plan,
which deals more with land use management rather than governance, although it
additionally covers some overlapping themes.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 21

Complete Bike, Walking Trail
Address Noise and Light Pollution
Consider Negah�,--e Eff ect can oas(al Area
Overpass/Roundabout Deeded at 4�5
[Minimize Visibility of Commercial Structures
Prowida l ccycling I✓ve�3ts ]deep Familyr�lacafion Atmosphere
Install Speed BurnpsrC;amcras on 24 Infrastructure Improvements Needed
Local Culture becoming less Local
Limit Growth Impacts on Water Quality
More Shopping Opportunities
Fo qtj fkcGrants to ompl t �� d �i� tr ils
Ail
,4�e' T .ice resence of ;1111C jS�iLi i
Don'tLqrye� it por PROW irresponsibly
Provide a Plan for wmxa-gemen More Crosswalks
Dredge Petiford
eerwCidents Log Park
nd Reg
Keepofl,9r mmunicatioitown Charm Feel
Limit Sprawl Make Town Aesthetically Pleasing
Continue to get input fro><•rl ciW-enConvenient Plano for Kids to Play
Provide Frequent Yard Waste Pick "^*'�°^ "� "`
Pothole Repairs Necess r r LimitCommercial D v lopm ntl ongestion
Plan FuturtBevclapment in KGs in xuill�i+�i8sian' I%"'s ldonLily Decrease in Population Density Needed
Fit3ishing Patti "vouid incrcase'E7affie to Laval Businesses ,ter ;Tplat
Fix the Fond ��� Umr�
Stgrtwc�s svin create TrsfiiL� nigMrna�e t =r� v#rn rien; too Involved
11 1"1 Fn toy rl 1 SF�iIY4ddress tin lss>aes ontov,�ards s�arld p
Renj,rj
Thin c =_[ SbaBes�tyiR JL st1 uctk.�L�l1OPfR$ Issu L
Cfoncci-aU{ : on i epairfiMaint riance of Current items
No CDrnmercial E3Lsinesses in Resident al Areas
CONCEPTUAL IDEAS
This plan has a lot of details in its pages. It is not necessary to digest them all
to understand the key aspects of the Plan. If you take nothing else away from
your reading of this document, know that there are four main concepts that define
this plan, which are a direct result of feedback received from residents. For more
details on these concepts, please see pages 120-129. For more details on public
engagement, see Section 2.1.3 and Appendices B and C.
v
22 `

PROTECT THE TOWN
Address flooding in existing problem areas and mitigate future damage by providing
for innovative stormwater management facilities in new and existing developments.
Encourage the protection of mature vegetation and prohibit development in wetland
areas.
DIRECT DENSITY
Direct density by carefully allowing wastewater utility capacity in select areas, such
as the new "main street." Permit only low -density residential development with
septic fields in low-lying, flood -prone areas.
WALKABLE "MAIN STREET"
Through the development of a new walkable "main street" town center, redefine the
Town's main street from Highway 24 to the new street. This will provide additional
commercial and residential capacity with the opportunity to foster local small
businesses. Highway -oriented uses would remain restricted towards the highway
corridor.
ENHANCE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTIVITY
The Town has already completed multiple pieces of a multi -use trail connecting all
areas of Cape Carteret along NC 58, NC 24 and Taylor Notion Road. Complete the
multi -use trail utilizing external funding to connect the community with safe walking
and bicycle paths. Provide for safe connections to all parts of Town through safe
crossings along Highway 24 and Taylor Notion Road.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 23

2. COMMUNITY
PROFILE
2.1 Introduction
26
2.1.1 Significant existing and emerging conditions
26
2.1.2 Key issues
26
2.1.3 Public Engagement
26
2.1.4 Community Concerns and Aspirations
30
2.1.5 Vision Statement
33
2.2 Existing and Emerging Conditions
34
2.3.1 Permanent Population Characteristics
35
2.3.1-1 Age Characteristics
35
2.3.1-2 Population by Sex
35
2.3.1-3 Population by Racial Characteristics
36
2.3.1-4 Vital Statistics
37
2.3.1-5 Education Characteristics
37
2.3.1-6 Permanent Population Characteristics
38
2.3.1-7 Veteran Population
38
2.3.2 Seasonal population
39
2.3.3 Population Growth and Projections
39
2.4.1 Housing Characteristics
43
2.4.1-1 Tenure
43
2.4.1-2 Occupancy Status
43
2.4.2 Current Housing Stock
44
2.4.2-1 Building Permit Activity
44
2.4.2-2 Median Home Value
44
2.5.1 Labor Force
45
2.5.2 Employment by Industry
46
2.5.2-1 Military Employment
46
2.5.3 Income Characteristics
47
24

II���"ni�lU I!;81'; I luVlllll .l'�Illll
1�
9

2.1 Introduction
This plan is crafted to satisfy the objectives and criteria of both the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) Land Use Planning Requirements (15A NCAC 07B.0701)
and the elements of a comprehensive plan as required by NCGS Chapter 160D-501.
It is based on a community vision and includes elements ranging from a visionary
future land use scenario to strategies to mitigate future storm events and protect
water quality as well as human life and property.
The following section outlines specific demographic information in the community,
including population, housing, and economic characteristics. These topics establish
a baseline understanding of where the community is today.
2.1.1 Significant existing and emerging conditions
Like all North Carolina coastal communities, Cape Carteret is affected more every
year by flooding, storm surges and tides. Global climate change will continue
to exacerbate these issues, and increased development and impervious surface
reduces the community's ability to be resilient. Population has been rising as more
and more people move to the Town for the high quality of life, and that is expected
to continue. Cape Carteret's challenge is to find a way to accommodate that growth
while keeping the small town feel, ameliorating the existing flooding issues, and
protecting the natural environment.
2.1.2 Key issues
Public Access: Public access in Cape Carteret is adequate, with access provided
through the boat launches at Manatee Street and on Pettiford Creek.
Land Use Compatibility: The town is maintaining existing low density residential
uses in low lying areas and encouraging all new growth towards higher ground with
more compact and sustainable design to improve environmental conditions.
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity: The Town has not experienced carrying capacity
issues, but plans to make decisions on development aligned with infrastructure
improvements.
Natural Hazard Areas: The Town seeks to mitigate damage in Natural Hazard Areas
by maintaining a lower density of existing homes and encouraging new growth
towards more suitable areas.
Water Quality: Aging septic systems in lower lying existing residential areas in the
Town's southern portion need better maintenance and monitoring from the Town
and local property owners to protect water quality.
26
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

2.1.3 Public Engagement
As described in the Vision Statement, Town stakeholders have provided consistent
input that decades into the future the Town should be safe, attractive, welcoming,
and that residents and visitors alike will know when they are in Cape Carteret, as
opposed to surrounding localities.
Community input and vision was collected throughout 2021 via a survey, public
meetings, tabling at Town events, stakeholder interviews, resident Vision
Statements, and through the Planning Board and Steering Committee, who acted as
advisors and liaisons throughout the plan process.
At the outset of the planning process, a website was created specifically to host
information about the plan, draft documents, and other materials. The website had
a form through which stakeholders could submit their Vision Statements for Cape
Carteret's future. These Vision Statements were combined and further refined by
the Planning Board and Steering Committee to create the Plan's Vision Statement
found on page 35. The Town wanted the statement to reflect stakeholder visions
and also be aspirational and forward -thinking.
A stakeholder survey was published and made available online through
SurveyMonkey as well as in paper format, which was kept at Town Hall and
circulated by Planning Board and Steering Committee members.
In addition to the online solicitation of input, there were tabling events at the
Watermelon Festival and Sounds by the Sound, and a public open house in the
Cape Carteret Community Park.
The collected Vision Statements can be found in Appendix C, "Community Vision
Statements." The results of the stakeholder survey can be found in Appendix C,
"Survey Results Summary." Further information was collected via an online,
interactive map that asked people to input
concerns about flooding, infrastructure
needs, and more, that is now incorporated
into this plan. For those people who
preferred not to use an online map, the
same information was collected via a
large -format map in the Town Hall
lobby and from paper maps
distributed via Town Hall in the lobby
or at meetings.
All of the information collected through
the public input process is used to
inform this plan's recommendations.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 27

HOME PLAN OVERVIEW RESOURCES PUBLIC MEETINGS MAPSOCIAL FEEDBACK CONTACT
•1V.�I ' [•
FEEDBACK FORM
The images on this page show (clockwise from
top of page): the Comprehensive and CAMA Land
Use Plan website, which was used to post draft
documents and collect vision statements; the
online interactive map which was used to collect
geographically -based input including areas of
flooding; and the poster version of the map
which was available to the public in the lobby of
Town Hall. The image on the facing page shows
a flier which was posted around town to solicit
input.
W
1i
:I
Sig, Hill
Golf Club
44 R• `����R�I � ..
dk aF'O inL�f l
Point

PLEASE PROVIDE INPUT ON
y
r,"
WN°
T
F-U-T-U- R I E I
Cape Carteret is currently engaged in
updating the Comprehensive/CAMA Land
Use Plan, a road map to the future which
will guide land use decisions
and public funding priorities
for the coming decades.
ot#941
Use this link or the QR code below to access the
Plan website to review the proposed VISION,
fill out information on MARSOCIAL, fill out
the resident survey, and more!
2
0
■❑
https://www.capecarteretplan.com/
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU....
Please review the proposed Vision
by using the QR code to the left or
the website address.
was
VOICE
MATTERS
July 28, 2021
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 29

2.1.4 Community Concerns and Aspirations
The Cape Carteret community is invested in the Town and in its future. In recent
years there has been both new commercial and residential development, and
flooding has become a significant issue in nearly all areas of the Town.
Residents want more services like restaurants, stores, professional and medical
offices, as well as a sewer system for commercial areas. Many people expressed
strong opinions that while they do want more commercial options, they do not
want more highway commercial development like neighboring towns. They want a
cohesive town design aesthetic.
Several people expressed a desire to have a strong delineation between commercial
and residential areas. Residents want more parks and recreation areas and safe
ways to walk and bike. They want to keep a small town feel while still allowing
growth.
Residents are concerned about flooding and want these issues to be addressed.
They want any new development to be responsible and to keep the aspects of the
small town that they already love about Cape Carteret.
The word bubbles below show some direct quotes from vision statements.
"Mahe towvu cowtvvterc�aL areas wt.ore'
eas�L� accessi Ue btu fivdshiv�'O
paths and tra l,Ls.11
30
"Fawtii� friendl. , safe town with
events, parks, rest2ur2vk,ts, 2 wt.ain
street, ester access, qn6, aualitu�
infrastructure to support Urowth."
'...best p ra ct�ces of sto rvwt.
water wt,itig2tEow av,ol fLoocl
-DrevevLti ovt,."
"To I2eep a swt.alL towvt, feed avt,c{
het i&ot be seLf�sh about shar�v q
with other foLl"s who wish to be
art of this area."
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -" C AaO�`�P

The word cloud below shows themes from vision statements and open-ended
survey questions. Common themes include keeping the small town feel, protecting
the natural environment, addressing infrastructure issues, and controlling growth.
Complete Bike[ Walking Trail
mall"Into n Url i.'�,irq De igix Stnr-day 'd
Address Noise and Light Pollution
Consider Negative Effect on Coastal Area
Overpass/Roundabout Deeded at 24/5
h+linimize Visibility of Commercial structures
l�r.} ripe f .r. vclin— EvUl.t r , beep Family. -Vacation Atmospherc
install Speed BL. r:'j_-::'-.:'' -i 11.'-r .:.7 ..: Infrastructure Improvements Needed
Local Culture bccaminy less Local
Impacts on Water Quality
Limit Growth More Shopping Opportunities
Focus s,okjGrants to Cornpl t, �', dr i tails
�' j,1'0L;e i)C0. 0t'i I rat tl6, 1
*?qq[a 46� Fri r.�7'nr�8 woe
90'�d a44pk f
't de�e1r�ren�1r More Cresswall�s
PLvvide a Ian for Starmivater P anageme�i
Dredge ltifr eCo T►d)idnts Dog Park
Keepz5 7 abork r Town Charm Feel
Limit Sprawl Make Town Aesthetically Pleasing
Continue to get input frexn cati/ells Convenient Place for lids to Play
Provide Frequent Yard Waste Pick ��°^ ��
4•�
Pothole Repairs I:� s r Limit Commercial D ve[opm rltl tinge tion
Pinn FutureDevalpprrlent in K&E ing xuiihkii85ivn otr'_. ]den LiLy Decrease 11� Population DensityNeeded
Fit�ishing Path �voutd ncrcase EYaffio to i Lfci3] Businesses � t i
Fix the roads n5 Um 6r3
StaibuL..,_ agj:_:cievreT: iYit nighlrns:e f=+"•+µ[Li r.i,- lt}C} lrLvolvetl
Maintain Fundin%to Ch IS
Address 1 T-affrc Issues on 4 towards Islanandscal§nvironment Preservation
Renair IIL structu�r pl$ s
Conccntrat;; on repair?Niaintonance Of C .went itci-i-
NO CDmrnercial Businesses in Residential Areas
Vision Statement themes
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 31

� - 1.
.� r r t }
� ..: p
�1 �
��}.: rIIR i�l

2.1.5 Vision Statement
"'In 2045, Cape Carteret is a model for resiliency,
sustainable growth and development in a changing
environment.
By developing a well -designed, mixed -use Town Center
to support local businesses and provide an anchor for
the local community, the County, and seasonal visitors,
the community will see only minor disruption from
storm events and the resilient built environment will
recover quickly from major storm events as a result of its
compact design and careful planning.
The Town will be an ideal place for residents of all ages to
thrive, offering walking and biking to daily activities."
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 33

2.2 Existing and Emerging Conditions
The following section paints a demographic portrait of Cape Carteret's population.
The data involved is required by CAMA's Land Use Plan Elements, 5A NCAC
0713.0702.
34
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2ORTH C AaO�`�P

2.3.1 Permanent Population Characteristics
2.3.1-1 Age Characteristics
This chart, or age cohort diagram, shows Cape Carteret's population divided by
detailed age group compared from 2010 (blue) and 2019 (orange). There is a
noticeably lower percentage of the population aged 20 to 29 compared to other
cohorts. There is also a noticeably lower percentage of age 20 to 59 in the Town in
2019 compared to other age brackets. This shows that more youth and work age
individuals have moved out of Cape Cateret in the past 10 years.
Population by Age 2010 & 2019
80 and Over
70 to 79
60 to 69
50 to 59
40 to 49
30 to 39
20 to 29
10 to 19
Under 9 Years
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00%
■ 2019 ■ 2010
Figure 1: Cape Carteret Population by Age &Sex
Source: American Community Survey 2010, 2019
2.3.1-2 Population by Sex
The demographic shift between 2010 and
2019 has remained generally the same as
the population increases, however there is
a notable increase in the amount of school
aged children residing within the Town,
particularly under 9 years old.
To the right, the chart shows that the 56.05%
male to female ratio in Cape Carteret is
56% female to 44% male, which is much
more skewed than the national average of
approximately 50.5% female to 49.5% male.
This may be due to larger margin of error
common in smaller sample sizes.
2019 Pop. by Sex
43.95%
■ Male ■ Female
Figure 2: Cape Carteret Population by Sex
Source: American Community Survey 2019
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 35

% Male/Female Population By Age
30.75% Under 18 years School age
5.6% 1.2% 18-24 years college age
44.5% A 25-64 years working age
23.7% 1
■ % Male ■ % Female
2.3.1-3 Population by Racial Characteristics
65+ years retirement age
Figure 3: Cape Carteret Population by Age & Sex
Source: American Community Survey 2019
According to 2019 data, an estimated 97% of Cape Carteret's population is white,
with 1% being Black or African American, 1% are two or more races, with small
numbers (less than 1% combined) reporting as Asian, Native American, Native
Hawaiian or Pacific Islander or some other race.
The Census reports Hispanic/Latino heritage separately from race; an estimated
7.4% of Cape Carteret residents identify as Hispanic or Latino.
White: 2.331: 97%
Figure 4:
Source: American Community Survey 2019
36
in American; 21; 1%
Indian and
itive; 7; 0%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; 0; 0%
OF pAPE C9
2 9�
3• A
o m
r �
20RTNEcARo�`�P

2.3.1-4 Vital Statistics
The chart below shows birth and death rates at the County level via the North
Carolina State Center for Health Statistics, which reports that the birth rate was
8.0, death rate was 12.2, and the natural increase of population was -4.3. Carteret
County's annual growth rate is reported to be approximately 0.05%, which supports
the negative rate of natural increase "dragging down" the growth.
Carteret County (Selected Vital Statistics for 2015-2019)
Birth Rate 8.0
Death Rate 12.2
Natural Increase -4.3
Figure 5: Carteret County Birth, Death, and
Natural Increase Rate 2015-2019
Source: North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics
2.3.1-5 Education Characteristics
Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over
Post -grad
Bachelor's Degree
Some College
High School
Less Than High School ,
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Figure 6: Cape Carteret Educational Attainment
Source: American Community Survey 2019
Cape Carteret has high levels of educational attainment, with a large majority of
residents having "some college" or higher experience.
By comparison, 94% of Americans have a high school diploma, while 49% have
an associates degree and 39% have a bachelor's degree. Educational attainment
among 25- to 29-year-olds in the United States has risen at every level by as much
as 80% since 2000.
The 9% of Americans who earn a master's degree or higher increase their
employability by less than 3%.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 37

2.3.1-6 Permanent Population Characteristics
The permanent population of Cape Carteret is 2,403 and has grown quickly from
1990 to 2019, compared to its Carteret County neighbors, the Town of Bogue and
Emerald Isle.
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
Current Permanent Population Growth Characteristics
1990 2000 2010 2020 (as of 7/20)
Cape Carteret Emerald Isle --e—Bogue
Figure 7: Population Growth 1990-2020
Source: U.S. Decennial Census 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020
2.3.1- 7 Veteran Population Population Estimates
Estimates of Veteran Population
Pre -World War II only
Between Korean War and World War II only
Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only
Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only
World War II, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era
Korean War and World War II, no Vietnam Era
Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War II
Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War II
Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War II
Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War II
Gulf War (8/1990 to 8/2001) and Vietnam Era
Gulf War (8/1990 to 8/2001), no Vietnam Era
Gulf War (9/2001 or later), and Gulf War (8/1990 to 8/2001),
and Vietnam Era
Gulf War (9/2001 or later) and Gulf War (8/1990 to 8/2001), -
no Vietnam Era
Gulf War (9/2001 or later), no Gulf War (8/1990 to 8/2001),
no Vietnam Era
Total
Figure 8: Period of Military Service for Civilian Veterans 18 Years and Over
Source: American Community Survey 2019 5 Year Estimates Detailed Table (B21002)

2.3.2 Seasonal population
Seasonal Population estimates are difficult to track, yet they can have profound
implications on the coastal regions of North Carolina, which experience a seasonal
influx of tourists.
Seasonal Population
% Increase in Population
Cape
Carteret
227
10.419:
Estimated Seasonal Population Total:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation
published a seasonal estimate in 2019 in order to
distribute funds from the Powell Bill Allocation Funds.
This reported seasonal population increase used rigorous
methodology and has been included in this report to give
guidance on a key piece of population movement.
2.3.3 Population Growth and Projections
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
0.8%
2,000 18.8%
Atlantic Beach
Beaufort
■ 2010 1,495
4,391
■ 2020 (as of 7/20) 1,776
4,425
5.3%
16.3%
18.3%
9.5%
. 9 0 1
Bogue Cape Carteret Cedar Point Emerald Isle
684 1,279 3,655
749F'n,917
1,513 3,847
*This number differs from the reported permanent population
because it is using the 2020 Population estimate
2)630
Figure 9: Seasonal Population Growth
Source: NCDOT
14.2%
8.3%
0.0%
22.6%
24.1%
� 0
Indian Beach Morehead City
Newport
Peletier Pine Knoll
Shores
112 8,661
4,150
644 1,339
112 9,891
4,494
799 1,642
Figure 10: Towns in Carteret County Population Growth
Source: U.S. Census 2010, 2020 Population Estimates
Cape Carteret has experienced a similar growth in population as some of its
incorporated neighbors of Carteret County, growing by 16.3% between 2010 and
2020 rising from a population of 1,917 to 2,230.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 39

70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Regional Population Growth (1980-2019)
Cape Carteret
am=
Carteret County
■ 1980-1990 1990-2000 0 2000-2010 0 2010-2019
A&
North Carolina
1980-1990
1990-2000
2000-2010
2010-2019
Cape Carteret
7.3%
19.6%
58.2%
25.4%
Carteret County
27.9%
13.0%
11.9%
5.0%
North Carolina
12.7%
21.4%
18.5%
10.0%
Figure 11: Regional Population Growth
Source: U.S. Census 2010, 2020 Population Estimates
Between 2000 and 2010, population increased at a faster rate than Carteret
County and this trend has continued at a slower rate through 2010 to 2019. These
percentages appear large due to the Town's generally small population, and they
reveal that the town has been growing more rapidly than the County and State
itself.
Ell
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2ORTH C AaO�`�P

Carteret County Forecasted Population Growth (2020-2050)
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Figure 12: Carteret County Projected Population Growth
Source: North Carolina Office of State and Budget Management
Population projections are available at the County level through North Carolina's
Office of State and Budget Management. The projection shows that the County's
growth will continue at a slow and steady rate rising from 71,352 in 2020 to 76,159
by 2030, and 86,439 by 2050.
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Cape Carteret Forecasted Population Growth (2020-2050)
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Values Forecast Lower Confidence Bound — —Upper Confidence Bound
Figure 13: Carteret County Projected Population Growth
Source: North Carolina Office of State and Budget Management
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 41

Estimated Permanent Population Growth
2010
2015
2020*
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
1,917
2,223
2,403*
2,662
2,910
3,158
3,406
3,654
3,902
Forecasting population growth beyond 2020 is important for planning for land use
and transportation decisions, however, it is a difficult process to ensure that there
is accuracy given the amount of variables that can impact population growth or
loss over time. Because this report has been using the 2019 ACS data, it has been
utilized in place of the true 2020 estimate to allow for consistent time spacing. If
growth stays on trend in Cape Carteret, the population will likely reach 3,902 by
2050. If we account for NCDOT's estimated seasonal growth (+227), the increase is
shown below.
Estimated Seasonal Population Growth
2010
2015
2020*
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
2,144
2,450
2,630
2,889
3,137
3,385
3,633
3,881
4,129
These projections show a 62% increase in permanent population between 2020 and
2050, and a 57% increase in seasonal population in the same time.
42
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

2.4.1 Housing Characteristics
Households, as defined by the Census
Bureau are comprised of one or more
people living together. This includes
families related by birth, marriage, or
adoption, as well as other combinations of
people, such as roommates.
2.4.1-1 Tenure
9.96%
90.04%
■ Owner Occupied ■ Renter Occupied
Figure 14 Housing by Occupancy
Source: American Community Survey 2019
2.4.1-2 Occupancy Status
20
(24'
The Town has 79.09% of its housing
units occupied and about 20.91% remain
vacant. 9.96% of occupied homes are
renter occupied, and 90.04% are owner
occupied.
The amount of unoccupied housing,
which numbers at 247, this may be
because these homes are secondary
homes to the owners or are used as
)off vacation rental units.
(934) Figure 15: Cape Carteret Occupancy Status
■ Occupied ■ Vacant Source: American Community Survey 2019
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 43

2.4.2 Current Housing Stock
There are currently 934 households in Cape Carteret, with an average of 2.57
people per household. This is consistent with national and state averages.
The median year housing in Cape Carteret was built was 1995.
There are a total of 1,181 available housing units in Cape Carteret, of which 1,040
units or 88% are either Single -Family Attached or Detached Homes, and 141 units
or 12% are Manufactured Homes. Other than two 4-unit condominium units, there
are no multi -family units in the Town.
2.4.2-1 Building Permit
Activity
14
Between 2016 and 2021
there were 64 building 12
permits issued for single 10
family homes. There were
none for multi -family 8
units. 6
4
IA
0
2.4.2-2 Median Home Value
The Median
Single Family Residential Building Permits
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Figure 17: Cape Carteret 5-Year Building Permits
Source: Carteret County Western Planning Office
Home Value of Median House Value
Cape Carteret is
$261,600, which is $400,000
about average for $350,000
the area. However, $300,000
it is higher than that
of North Carolina $z5o,000
and Carteret County. $200,000
Home values on $150,000
Emerald Isle or
other coastal areas $100,000
that have access to $50,000
the water tend to be
considerably higher. $0
Cape Cedar Point Peletier Emerald Isle Carteret
Carteret County
Figure 18: Median House value
Source: American Community Survey 2019
North
Carolina
0 pAPE C9
3 A
o m
r I
2ORTH C Aaov

2.5.1 Labor Force
The Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is the
percentage of all people of working age who
are either working or actively seeking work
(Employed + Unemployed). Cape Carteret's
LFPR is 51.5%, which is below the national
2019 rate of 63.6%, and slightly below the state
average of 58.4%. (U.S. Census ACS 2019 Table
DP03) These rates incorporate the 16 to 19 years
and both 65 to 74 years and 75 years and older,
which bring down the average participation rate.
The total number of those employed living in
Cape Carteret is 811.
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
% Of Persons Over 16 Years Not In Labor Force
Cape Carteret
Cedar Point Emerald Isle Carteret County North Carolina
Figure 19: % Not in Labor Force
Source: American Community Survey 2019
Nearly half (48.5%) of Cape Carteret's population over 16 is not in the labor
force. Those persons considered not in the labor force consist of students,
retired residents, seasonal workers, or people performing unpaid family work.
Cape Carteret has a higher percentage of people not in the labor force than it
neighboring Towns, Carteret County, and North Carolina.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 45

2.5.2 Employment by Industry
26.9% of Cape Carteret is employed in Educational services, and healthcare and
social assistance, the next highest percentage being Construction at 15.3% and
Retail Trade at 12.9%.The town does not appear to be too heavily dependent on one
source of employment, which is favorable in times of economic shifts.
Employment by Industry, 2019
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and
mining
a.Q%
Construction
15.3%
Manufacturing
1.8%
Wholesale Trade
0.6%
Reta 11 Trade
12.9%
Transportation and Warehousing, and Utilities
5.9%
Information
1.1%
Finance and Insurance, and real estate and rental
and leasing
5.7%
Professional, scientific, and management, and
administrative and waste management services
9.9%
Educational services, and health care and social
assistance
26.9%
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and
accommodation and food services
7.6%
Other services, except public administration
3.9%
Public Administration
8.3%
Figure 20: Employment by Industry
Source: American Community Survey 2019
2.5.2-1 Military Employment
Cape Carteret is in close proximity to military installations, including the Marine
Corps Auxiliary Landing Field, or Bogue Field, the United States Coast Guard
Station on Emerald Isle, the large Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune, Cherry
Point, Atlantic Field, and other offices and recruiting stations. It is likely that there
are Cape Carteret residents employed by the military, however, they are counted
by the Census at their "home of record" and are not easily identified by military
employment. The 2020 Census, which has not been released as of the time of this
report, will begin to count members of the military where they are stationed. Below,
the American Community Survey collects estimates of the veteran population. There
are a total of 248 veterans estimated in Cape Carteret.
inl
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
20R -H C AaO�`�P

2.5.3 Income Characteristics
Cape Carteret's per capita income is lower
than neighboring Emerald Isle and Cedar Point,
however, the median household income is higher.
The area has considerably higher incomes than
the state of North Carolina. The reason for this
discrepancy is maybe due to the presence of
people not currently drawing an income from
a job. Per capita income is the mean income
computed for every man, woman, and child in a
particular group including those living in group
quarters. It is derived by dividing the aggregate
income of a particular group by the total
population in that group. This measure is rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
$90,000
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
Per Capita Income & Median Household Income
Cape Carteret Emerald Isle Cedar Point North Carolina
■ Per Capita Income ■ Median Household Income
Figure 21: Per Capita Income & Median Household Income
Source: ESRI Business Analyst
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 47

3. EXISTING
CONDITIONS
3.1 Introduction
50
3.2 Natural Systems
50
3.2.1 Areas of Environmental Concern
50
3.2.2 Soil Characteristics
52
3.2.3 Water Quality Classifications
55
3.2.4 Flood and Other Natural Hazard Areas
54
3.2.5 Storm Surge Areas
62
3.2.6 Inlet Hazard Areas
64
3.2.7 Non -coastal Wetlands
64
3.2.8 Water Supply Watersheds
64
3.2.9 Primary Nursery Areas
64
3.2.10 Other Environmentally Fragile Areas
66
3.2.11 Additional Natural Features of Concern
66
3.3 Environmental Conditions
68
3.3.1 Water Quality Assessment
68
3.3.1-1 Surface Water Quality
69
3.3.1-2 Shellfishing Waters
70
3.3.1-3 Areas with Water Quality Issues
70
3.3.2 Natural Hazards
72
3.3.2-1 Flood Zones
72
3.3.2-2 Storm Surge Inundation
72
3.3.2-3 Areas Experiencing Significant Shoreline Erosion
72
3.3.3 Natural Resources
73
3.3.3-1 Environmentally Fragile Areas
73
3.3.3-2 Areas with Incompatible Development
73
3.4 Existing Land Use Analysis
74
3.4.1 Land Use Classifications
74
3.4.2 Land Use Patterns within Watersheds
76
3.4.3 Description of Existing Land Uses
77
3.4.3-1 Residential
77
3.4.3-2 Commercial
78
3.4.3-3 Governmental / Institutional / Community
Facilities
78
48

3.4.3-4 Golf Course
78
3.4.3-5 Churches / Cemeteries / Lodges
78
3.4.3-6 Utilities
79
3.4.3-7 Undeveloped / Forestland
79
3.4.3-8 Marshland
79
3.4.3-9 Water
79
3.4.4 Historic, Cultural and Scenic Areas
79
3.4.5 Development Trends and Future Land Needs
79
3.5 Community Facilities
81
3.5.1 Water System
81
3.5.2 Wastewater Treatment Systems
83
3.5.3 Stormwater System
85
3.5.4 Transportation System
87
3.5.4-1 Proposed Roadway Improvements
87
3.5.4-2 NCDOT Functional Classifications
89
3.5.4-3 Major Streets with Capacity and other
Deficiencies
91
3.5.4-4 Traffic Volumes
91
3.5.4-5 Impact of Existing Transportation Facilities on
Land Use Patterns
91
3.5.5 Parks, Recreation and Open Space
93
3.5.5-1 Public Water / Access Boat Launch
93
3.5.5-2 Parks and Open Space
93
3.5.6 Historic Properties
93
3.5.7 Police & EMS Services
95
3.5.8 Schools
95
3.6 Land Use Suitibility Analysis
97
3.6.1 Vacant Land by Zoning
97
3.6.2 Acreage of Vacant Land
97
3.6.3 Vacant Land Suitable for Development Based on
Environmental Contraints
97
3.7 Analysis of Current Land Use Plan
97
3.7.1 Consistency of Existing Ordinances with the Current
Land Use Plan Policies
100
3.7.2 Adoption of the Current Implementation Measures
100
3.7.3 Effectiveness of the Current Policies
100
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 49

3.1 Introduction
Cape Carteret is located in a scenic and sensitive natural environment. Life in Town
affects the natural environment and is in turn effected by natural systems. Runoff
from streets, parking lots, and lawns finds its way into Pettiford Creek, Deer Creek
and Bogue Sound. Subchapter 7B .0702(c)(2) requires that the land use plan
describe and analyze the natural features and environmental conditions within the
Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction and to assess their capabilities and limitations
for development.
3.2 Natural Systems
3.2.1 Areas of Environmental Concern
Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) are identified as properties that include
coastal wetlands, estuarine waters and public trust areas, and the estuarine
shoreline. Coastal wetlands are any marshes subject to regular or occasional
flooding by lunar or wind tides. Estuarine waters are defined as all the waters
of the Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North Carolina and all the water of
bays, sounds, rivers, and tributaries thereto seaward of the dividing line between
coastal fishing waters and inland fishing waters. Public trust areas include waters
and submerged lands in the coastal region where the public has rights of use and/
or ownership, including rights of navigation and recreation. The estuarine shoreline
AEC in Cape Carteret is:
• all shorelands within 75 feet landward of the mean high water level, or normal
water level, of the estuarine waters, and
• for those shorelands adjacent to Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) in the
Wester Bogue Sound, 575 feet landward of the mean high water level, or
normal water level, of the estuarine waters.
AEC areas in Cape Carteret are located primarily in the Pettiford Creek vicinity and
along the Bogue Sound and Deer Creek shorelines. They include estuarine waters,
public trust waters, estuarine shoreline, and coastal wetlands. All of these areas are
subject to stricter regulations that control development and priority is given to their
conservation. CAMA standards for estuarine shoreline development require that
• the development will not cause significant damage to estuarine resources
• the development not interfere with public rights of access to or use of navigable
waters or public resources;
• the development preserve and not weaken natural barriers to erosion;
• impervious surfaces not exceed 30 percent of the lot area located within the
AEC boundary;
• the development comply with state soil erosion, sedimentation, and stormwater
management regulations; and
• the development comply with the CAMA Land Use Plans.
50

e.e-
°
o PaaKaaE � ; ' ♦ 4 � �� Y-: LL s���x� s: •
-x J a
qr �
o M • + ice• . c
_ owe m oa � y • • .� � .
i ea o �e •■ r • • � r o °
y �, ■ Legend
• �• ,� : E : 3 Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
r US Fish & Wildlife Service - Wetlands
� � a
•. ♦ w ■ • �� t s WETLANDS TYPE
+♦ ■ • j w a— F-1 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
1 b
/; ' • • 1 ti' ♦ o Estuarine and Marine Wetland
3 , r p -. Freshwater Emergent Wetland
• •■ ♦ a _ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
gill Q 8 • •; F-7 Freshwater Pond
v
_ Lake
Riverine
° • ;fit " � ♦ ' •
' ®+" ■ .• .8 o The Coastal Resources
a • c %a Commission rules define
Coastal Wetlands as any marsh
° ` * • '„ • s w & in the 20 coastal counties
■ `• ti ■ . _- (including Carteret County
` • v ` . ,. ' ,, ; • and therefore, Cape Carteret)
r• r rft• i . �•' ' + ` that regularly or occasionally
• • , • ' ` • floods by lunar or wind tides.
p ; ; • + .r. Non -Coastal Wetlands as those
• 3 1• • ; • +• F r�i •� ` ` • ' • , , ,, a areas that are inundated or
; •. • • p saturated by surface or ground
i•ti: .y •. • �.. . water at a frequency and
ee ,, • . . . ; duration to support, and that
°°°� '``• ` • �- + ' ' •' under normal circumstances
• \ •• do support, a prevalence of
• • . • • . • • vegetation typically adapted for
• life in saturated soil conditions.
�• ,�\�r( 4 �+ a\ <( �� Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
jk° •� � + � J i National Wetlands Inventory
December 2021
`-Y—/.. ` . • • - 0 175350 700 1,050 7.400
\�1 ---.--..�• �- -®Feet
�' - SUMMIT
Source: Soil types in Carteret 51 CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certifica County based on Natural Resources
Conservation Service maps; 2021.

Specific CAMA development standards for AECs can be found in 15 NCAC 7H.
Additional use standards for development projects within the ORW estuarine
shoreline include (i) having no stormwater collection system and (ii) providing a
buffer zone of at least 30 feet from the mean high water line. Development within
the designated Areas of Environmental Concern is restricted by CAMA regulations
and development guidelines.
3.2.2 Soil Characteristics
The majority of soils in Cape Carteret's planning jurisdiction are hydric soils.
Hydric soils often contain an abundance of moisture and generally lack oxygen.
According to the Soil Survey of Carteret County, North Carolina, soils such as Leon
sand, Wando fine sand, and Hoboken muck are the predominant soils and they are
hydric. Other soils that are not entirely hydric yet include hydric soils or have wet
spots are: Kureb sand, Baymeade fine sand, and Seabrook fine sand. All of these
soils present limitations to development, particularly, where a septic system is
needed. Generally, many soil limitations can be overcome with special engineering
considerations. For instance, a severe limitation precluding septic systems can
be overcome by extending public sewer to the affected area. While engineering
can often work around problems presented by soil conditions, there are soils and
habitats that are not suited for development regardless of engineering capabilities.
Soil conditions should be taken into consideration when planning for land use.
Generally, most of the soils in the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction have limitations
for many urban uses due to wetness, low strength, and restricted permeability. One
hundred percent of the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction contains soils that are
rated as having severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields.
Site -specific soil analyses are required by the Carteret County Environmental
Health Services to evaluate the suitability of a particular parcel for a septic system.
Centralized sewer facilities are needed to support intensive urban development. The
table on page 54 describes the soils within the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction
and the specific limitations for septic system use.
Hydric soils are soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of
hydrophytic vegetation. Hydrophytic vegetation along with hydric soils and wetland
hydrology are considered the three essential characteristics of wetlands.
Consequently, the presence of hydric soils is one indicator of probable wetlands
locations. The precise location of wetlands must, however, be determined through
field investigation. More detailed data regarding the criteria for defining hydric soils
as well as information regarding measures for mitigating particular soils limitations
can be obtained at the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Based on information from the Carteret County Soils Survey, the soils in Cape
Carteret may provide limitations for the density of development that is possible
without using an alternative to septic tank designs.
52

°°d
01
�y O
o a e Legend
o p d n
pflo 6 m
„ � q o a a � d � o s' a � 1 Town of Cape Carteret
a 0 a a s . j Boundary
Soils Classifications
RvR - RgvmPAfIA fine
❑ ° o J sand, 1 to 6 percent
slopes
P aQ
- CH -Carteret sand,
,+
frequently flooded
awnux -
$p^ AP 0
° CL Carteret sand, low,
_o •, frequently flooded
HB - Hobucken muck,
frequently flooded
a B - KuB - Kureb sand, 0 to 6
LJ 3 O °o u0
percent slopes
4 O O p ❑ =0 71
� Ln -Leon sand
° ° p ° - Mu - Murville muck
per} y
sand
A °o
P
0a Nd - Newhan fine sand,
° ■ - dredged, 2 to 30 percent
o 4 slopes
OQd Qb
MSe - Seabrook fine sand
a J °ao WaB - Wando fine sand,
n o O to 6 percent slopes
° urce: Soil types in Carteret
unty based on Natural Resour es
` C*nervation Service maps; 2021.
•
• NN
_.-_••--------- 0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
•------------_--�--MAY 2021 ®Feet
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22
53

ByB
Baymeade fine sand-1 to 6 percent slopes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Carteret sand, frequently flooded
Carteret sand -low -frequently flooded
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Hobucken muck -frequently flooded
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Kureb sand-0 to 6 percent slopes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Leon sand
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Murville mucky sand
Newhan fine sand-dredged-2 to 30 percent slopes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Seabrook fine sand
Wando fine sand-0 to 6 percent slopes
Water
261.9
------------------
8.71
31.84
-------------------
43.94
------------------
593.52
------------------
171.5
------------------
7.05
39.82
-------------------
98.6
519.89
397.76
12%
-------------------
0%
1 %
-------------------
2%
-------------------
27%
-------------------
8%
-------------------
0%
2%
-------------------
5%
24%
18%
Severe: poor filter
------------------------------------
Severe:
flooding/ponding/poor
Severe:
flooding/ponding/poor
------------------------------------
Severe: flooding/ponding
------------------------------------
Severe: poor filter
------------------------------------
Severe: wetness/poor filter
------------------------------------
Severe: wetness/poor filter
Severe: flooding/ponding
I ------------------------------------
Severe: wetness/poor filter
Severe: poor filter
CH
CL
HB
KuB
Ln
Mu
Nd
Se
WaB
W
Totals 1 2174.53 1 100%

3.2.3 Water Quality Classifications
All surface waters in North Carolina are assigned a water quality classification by
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Classifications
are designations applied to surface water bodies that define the best uses to be
protected within these waters, as required by the Clean Water Act. The most
common primary classification within North Carolina is Class C, which protects
waters for the propagation of aquatic life and for secondary recreation. Other
primary freshwater classifications provide for additional levels of protection
for uses consisting of water supplies (Class WS-I through Class WS-V) and for
primary recreation (Class B). Saltwater primary classifications are denoted as SC,
SB, and SA. In addition to the primary classification, one or more supplemental
classifications may be assigned to specific surface waters to provide additional
protection to waters with special uses or values. North Carolina's supplemental
classifications include NSW (nutrient sensitive waters), Tr (trout waters), HQW (high
quality waters), ORW (outstanding resource waters), and SW (swamp waters). All
primary and secondary water quality classifications are described in the following
table.
Within the Cape Carteret area, Deer Creek and Bogue Sound are classified as
SA/ORW, and Pettiford Creek is classified as SA/HQW. Development in areas of
sensitive watersheds involves additional standards that can be located in 15A NCAC
04B .0124.
North Carolina is required to assess water quality under Section 303(d) and 305(b)
of the federal Clean Water Act. Every two years an "Integrated Water Quality
Report" must be produced. The 2020 Integrated Water Quality report identifies
Pettiford Creek as exceeding the criteria of a Category 4 impaired waterbody.
This Category 4 means that a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program, which
is a calculation of the maximum pollutant a waterbody can receive to still meet
standards, is not necessary to meet water quality standards, although the quality
is still impaired. Deer Creek and the Bogue Sound areas within Cape Carteret are
listed as 303(d) impaired waterways. This means a TMDL program is required in
order to meet water quality standards. The presence of fecal pollutant impairs these
shellfish growing areas.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 55

Classification I Best Usage of Waters
C Aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity (including fishing, and fish),
wildlife, secondary recreation, agriculture and any other usage except for primary recreation or
as a source of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes. All freshwaters
shall be classified to protect these uses at a minimum.
----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B Primary recreation (which includes swimming on a frequent or organized basis) and any other
best usage specified for Class C waters.
•----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WS I - WS V Source of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food -processing purposes for those
usersdesiring maximum protection of their water supplies and any best usage specified for
Class C waters.
Classification I Best Usage of Waters
SC Aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity (including fishing, fish and
functioning primary nursery areas (PNAs)),wildlife, secondary recreation, and any other usage
except primary recreation or shellfishing for market purposes.
SB
SA
Primary recreation (which includes swimming on a frequent or organized basis) and any other
usage specified for Class SC waters.
Shellfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified for Class SB or SC waters.
Classification Best Usage of Waters
HQW
High Quality Waters. Waters which are rated as excellent based on biological and
physical/chemical characteristics through Division monitoring or special studies, native and
special native trout waters (and their tributaries) designated by the Wildlife Resources
Commission, primary nursery areas (PNAs) designated by the Marine Fisheries Commission
and other functional nursery areas designed by the Marine Fisheries Commission.
NSW
Nutrient Sensitive Waters. Waters that experience or are subject to excessive growths of
microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Excessive growths are growths which the Commission
determines impair the use of the water for its best usage as determined by the classification
applied to such waters.
ORW Outstanding Resource Waters. Unique and special surface waters of the state that are of
exceptional state or national recreational or ecological significance that require special
protection to maintain existing uses.
SW Swamp Waters. Waters which are topographically located so as to generally have very low
velocities and other characteristics which are different from adjacent streams draining steeper
topography.
Tr
Trout Waters. Waters which have conditions that shall sustain and allow for trout propagation
and survival of stocked trout on a year-round basis. Idds014
56

Saltwater Quality Characteristics
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
TClassification Best Uses I Rules
Shellfish Harvest Areas • Commercial shellfish
(SA) harvesting;
• Primary recreational
activities; and SC Best Uses
• All SA waters are HQW.
High Quality Waters
(HQW)
Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW)
• Excellent quality saltwater
• All SA waters, ORW, and
PNAs are also HQW
• Excellent quality saltwater;
and
• Outstanding Fish Habitat or
fisheries; or
• High existing recreation; or
• Special Federal or State
designation; or
• Part of a State/National
Park/Forest; or
• The Sedimentation Control
Commission has as many as 5
increased design standards for
projects in all HQW zones. See
Sedimentation Control Rules for
Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B.0124).
• The Sedimentation Control
Commission has as many as 5
increased design standards for
projects in all HQW zones. See
Sedimentation Control Rules
forDesign Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B.0124).
• The Sedimentation Control
Commission has as many as 5
increased design standards for
projects in all HQW zones. See
Sedimentation Control Rules for
Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B.0124)
Stormwater Control"
Low Density
Option High Density Option
• 30' minimum
• Systems must control runoff
buffer.
from 1.5" of rainfall and be
• 25% maximum
designed for 85%TSS removal.
built -upon area.
• Refer to Stormwater
Management Rules 15A NCAC
2H .1000 for specific design
information.
• Stormwater management measures are the
same as the primary classification requirements.
• Refer to the Stormwater Management Rules for
specific stormwater control requirements in the
20 coastal NC counties.
• New developments located within 575' of the
mean high water level of ORW class waters must
meet, at a minimum, the Low Density Options
specified in the Coastal Stormwater
Management Rules for SA class waters. Specific
stormwater control strategies for protecting
ORW class saltwaters are developed during the
process to reclassify waters with the ORW

3.2.4 Flood and Other Natural Hazard Areas
The 100-year floodplain is land subject to a one percent or greater chance of
flooding in any given year. Generally, the parcels adjacent to the shorelines of
Bogue Sound, Deer Creek, and Pettiford Creek are the areas within the 100-year
floodplain. The floodplain surrounding Deer Creek is the most expansive area of
floodplain and reaches inland from the sound across NC Highway 24. Approximately
20 percent of the Cape Carteret planning area is within the 100-year floodplain. An
additional 4 percent of the town's planning area is within the 500-year floodplain.
Flood Zones are depicted in the map on the next page.
National Flood Insurance Program repetitive loss claims in Carteret County are
in the range of $2.5 million to $25 million according the Federal Emergency
Management Agency and the Federal Insurance Administration. The definition of
a repetitive loss property used by the Federal Insurance Administration is: "any
insured structure with at least two flood insurance losses, each of at least $1,000,
in any rolling 10-year period". During this 10-year period, Cape Carteret had 9
repetitive loss properties with 23 reported losses at a cost of $1,345,602.
As part of the public input process, data was gathered by residents entering
information on an interactive online map. The maps on pages 59 and 60 show
points where residents denoted areas of flooding, overlaid with stormwater
infrastructure and elevation. As expected, the majority of reported flooding occurs
in the areas of lowest elevation, but there are flooding issues all over town.
The Town of Cape Carteret adopted updated State model Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance in June of 2020.
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

Jifil 111111 Ili I I �
\
'
-
� \

//////_ 1 _ _, �/////� �•-i �'� i
0
P
0
a
Legend
� \ F°'ftwE � • � Carteret Boundary
o - oL1 Areas of Flooding
•��� o Effective Flood Zones
Flood Zones
j. 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
HAZARD
AE - Base Flood Elevations
VE - Coastal Areas with a 1 % or Greater
Chance of Flooding &Additional Hazard
- - w -- - Associated with Storm Waves
z
X -Areas of Minimal Fllood Hazard/Above
500-year Flood Level
j r
- U � OPEN WATER
Flood Frequency
Flood frequency in Carteret County, NC
according to NOAA
\ / i Flood Prone Areas
A / Based on Repetitive Loss Claims Filed with
1 `i•L—M�r f/ A FEMA
• '4
' e • i
1
m
�• Y' w� 4 Source: Federal Emergency
- Management Agency(FEMA) in
conjunction with North Carolina
Department of Emergency
• Management(NCDEM);
stakeholder input via map. social
•
•
N
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
MAY 2021
®Fea
®SUMMIT
•1

N
e �o��EH ao,o
/ Legend
ir��Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
1 Areas of Fbodim
oCI'' L1 Cape Carteret Elevations
LL
Sea Level
! High 45.324
• • Low-5.4960Ir
z 1 III
1 r1�
s
1
J �
i
E
Source: Open Source Data - NC
OneMap; Public Input via map.
social
N
A
0 175350 700 1.050 1,400
o ®Feei
MAY 2021
® SUMMIT
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22

3.2.5 Storm Surge Areas
The Maps delineating hurricane surge inundation areas have been provided to Cape
Carteret by the Division of Coastal Management. Storm surge is the rise in sea
level caused by water being pushed towards land by hurricane winds. The storm
surge inundation areas are based upon National Hurricane Center model maps and
have been recompiled by the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information
and Analysis. Surge inundation areas have been mapped to illustrate the extent of
hurricane -induced flooding based upon slow moving (forward velocity less than 15
mph) and fast moving (forward velocity greater than 15 mph) category 1 and 2,
category 3, and category 4 and 5 hurricanes.
Storm surge areas for fast moving hurricanes are shown in the map on the opposite
page. The areas subject to storm surge inundation delineated on this map are
based upon the most intense storm intensity and storm speed. Approximately two-
thirds of the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction land area is subject to flooding
from a storm surge. More detailed storm hurricane surge maps are available for
review in the offices of the Town of Cape Carteret Town Clerk. Flooding as well as
high winds would impact the Cape Carteret area during a major coastal storm. The
table below describes the impact of the various categories of hurricanes.
While the identified hurricane storm surge inundation areas resulting from Category
1 and 2 hurricanes often parallel the 100-year flood hazard area shown in Figure 2,
there are some additional portions of Cape Carteret that are particularly subject to
more intensive hurricane -induced flooding. Such areas are generally located south
of Pettiford Creek and between NC Highway 24 and Bogue Sound. The Star Hill Golf
Club vicinity is the only area projected to remain above the storm surge of major
hurricanes.
Table 3
and Table
4 delineate
storm surge
flooding by
hurricane
category and
the acres
inundated.
See Appendix
E for SLOSH maps by
category.
62
Table 4
Storm Surge Flooding
Category Acres Inundated %of Total Planning 41
Jurisdiction
of CAPE C9
0 A
o m
r �
2oRTH C

F
OSH refers to Sea, Lake
Overland Surges from
rricanes. This map depicts the
storm surge areas affected by a
Category 1 through 5 Hurricane.
V$
r
;V
A�
QAO�
Legend
I: 3 Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
Storm Surge (< s ft above ground)
- Category 1
- Category 2
Category 3
r - r W Category 4
no . ' , I I -Category 5
Source: National Oceanic
and Atmospheric
Administration(N OAA) /National
Hurricane Center(NHC)
C �
00
Ri C � �.�•- •- • ..�••�..�.. . ...� - 0 1]5350 MA®Feet
Y 2021
m Wi ff
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22
63

3.2.6 Inlet Hazard Areas
The "Inlet Hazard Area Boundary, 2019 Update: Science Panel Recommendations
to the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission" does not mention any inlet
hazard areas in Cape Carteret. The closest inlet hazard area is Bogue Inlet at
Emerald Isle
3.2.7 Non -coastal Wetlands
Non -coastal wetlands include all other wetlands not classified as coastal wetlands.
These non -coastal wetlands are not covered by CAMA regulations (unless the
Coastal Resource Commission designates them as a natural resource AEC) but are
protected by the Clean Water Act. Consequently, the US Army Corps of Engineers
is responsible for regulating these '404' wetlands. Authorization must be obtained
from the Corps prior to disturbing such wetlands. As with coastal wetlands, the
precise location of non -coastal wetlands can only be determined through a field
investigation and analysis. However, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, through its
National Wetlands Inventory, has identified the general location of wetlands. The
National Wetlands Inventory Maps are available from the US Department of the
Interior and the NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Division of Soil and Water Conservation. The wetlands maps are not intended to
be utilized for regulatory purposes. The Pettiford Creek vicinity is the area where
freshwater wetlands are primarily found in Cape Carteret. Wetlands are shown in
the map on page 51.
3.2.8 Water Supply Watersheds or Wellhead Protection Areas.
There are no public water supply watersheds or Wellhead Protection Areas in the
Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction.
3.2.9 Primary Nursery Areas
Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) are identified by the Marine Fisheries Commission.
PNA areas have been designated by the State as being highly productive for
juvenile habitat of marine species. The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
is responsible for preserving, protecting, and developing Primary Nursery Areas for
commercially important finfish and shellfish. The NC Marine Fisheries Division has
identified the portion of Pettiford Creek downstream of Starkey Creek as the only
primary nursery area within the Cape Carteret planning area. There are no Primary
Nursery Areas identified in the inland waters of the Cape Carteret planning area
under the Wildlife Resource Commission jurisdiction.
•,
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

J
♦ + F---tea• - -� h -
y. N
_ _ .. _
I
--.f...
V
Gales Creek
r
f0
,Y E � ' � � 1
-
Broad Creek
.0103 12 a e
0103 12 b
aai�n `
Pettiford Creek
5 Sanders Creek
nrl
_
.010312fi fi..r f .010312c
N
•�rl
i
.9 11'r""�
Goose Creek
+
.0103 12 d
4k,
CHERRY I
i
U S VIRHARY R
d T
_
--r}FWnfirry
i� 1 0103 12 . a Archer Creek
"
,.,
4 i
k I
336
'
3 5
334
i
334
333 ` 1
This map was produced by the Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
—
program. Informational data used to create this map were collected from
�.v f
federal, state, county, and private organizations. This map is a general
guide to assist the public and is for illustrative purposes only. While every
effort is made to keep this map accurate and up-to-date, it is not intended
MDZRA
to replace any official source. Under no circumstances shall the State of
North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omissions made from
reliance on any information contained herein from whatever source nor
373 Ishall
37�
the State be liable for any other consequences from any such reliance.
Background imagery are U.S. Geological Fishery Nursery Areas Fishery Nursery Areas
Survey 1:100,000-scale planimetric maps. ® Primary N/
® Permanent Secondary Map Datum: NAD83
® Special Secondary Map Projection: NC State Plane
Map Date: March 2011
® Military Danger 1000 0 1000 2000 Yards
Zones and
Restricted Areas
locator map Map 21 0.7 0 0.7 1.4 Miles
- Inland waters(WRC jurisdiction)
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 65

3.2.10 Other Environmentally Fragile Areas
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
The NC Natural Heritage Program compiles a list of natural heritage areas based
upon an inventory of natural diversity across the state. Natural areas are evaluated
on the basis of the occurrences of rare plant and animal species, rare or high
quality natural communities, and geologic features. Designation as a Significant
Natural Heritage Areas does not imply that any protection or public access exists.
Cape Carteret contains portions of two significant natural heritage areas: they are
the Croatan National Forest Megasite and the Bogue Inlet Macrosite. One parcel
within Cape Carteret's planning jurisdiction is part of the Croatan Game Land.
The game land is located on both sides of US 58, north of NC 24. The McLean
Sanctuary, also known as Hunting Island, is owned and managed by The National
Audubon Society. The sanctuary is located within the designated 100- year flood
hazard area and contains some wetlands areas. This is the only sanctuary located in
the Cape Carteret planning area.
Information on the Natural Heritage Program Map, shown on page 67, comes
from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program(NCNHP); Natural and Cultural
Resources site and helps project planners and landowners make decisions will
benefit the local economy and impact society in a way that produces the least
amount of damage to ecological resources. This map also does not show all
properties under Town ownership as they are not registered with the NCNHR
Areas Containing Endangered Species
Currently within Cape Carteret there are no critical habitats for threatened and
endangered species. Based on IPaC (Information for Planning and Consultation)
through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, there are a number of candidtates,
threatened and endangered species within the areas of influence (AOI) which
includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in the area. In Carteret County, the following species classes are
potentially affected by activites within Cape Carteret: 2 mammals, 4 bird species, 5
retpiles, 1 insect species and 2 flowering plants.
••
_ 1
CAPE cq9
F
3 A
O m ..-
y00 C AaO�`�P

�... . `
. •�
. r
op
-y1
;'�.,.' .I•♦1 '
`
R� III •.I
7p
r oNK�rrl.
_:�.:.
� J
,
�Go a"♦
��ftft
.wwh
r
.. ���
r J
• � t /
1
�
.� ♦
a
t..•+
�� •4
o • � o�
°fir?
v r
E'o
�'90
r=w wu - ' •
6 t •+
r �� a `
o
a2
r Y
- +r• '
°
•
�,o
�e
.r ; • F.F�,� :°�'�
j f t. • os : r rye
Legend
+. a ♦
�`.t. t r " F a
'3 + < <! • ;
,� Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
• ems.
t °aEs° '/ ■i
Dedicated Nature Preserve
Rai
w
•
!
Conservation Easement
♦ /
a„r
�•.
1 Other Protection
ra.
° ■ r►•
re no•rour+ono •
•
`+,
j 1 ++�
.
� Federal Ownership
State Ownership
,
■ • fr , j ■
_ Local Government Ownership
♦
• 3r
j,,
\ •.....�
a .
. r ' a r •
Private
10,
` d r
'� � r � • 1 owE�`
♦ a "m o°°a
E y a z\ - f.�-,t•s w `i
` t♦i NE
s Eoar Ion y
= r •'� i• I «
w
m
/
• rt
n Ni
♦ F ue
•y
` a�
:a ♦ ♦ i
ca NE�d'I r r . ' � � �i tI,
rx It s
•
mN - ..
, ! a • t
1 ar■
ree o ` `' r qyyy • 7
■ $ w„ a
■IRV
f . • i`�o•, i .. c9
•' �pY r.or
; .W
14
EP
rNE'. , t
Sri �! � •m•tm� ; m'• r� ..
/
1
lk
lit
• IH ' � 5°o0.wE P•'
I
' Source: North Carolina Natural
•' J ` % • Heritage Program; Natural and
►Cultural Resources
` 1
MAY 2021
� ' N
A
0 175350®00
�.
®Sl1MMIT A
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22

Prime Wildlife Habitats
Within the state, there are four distinct areas where a huge diversity of fish and
wildlife habitats exist: the Mid -Atlantic Coastal Plain, the Southern Blue Ridge,
the Southeastern Plains and Piedmont. Cape Carteret falls within the Mid -Atlantic
Coastal Plain which is a part of the Level III ecoregion that stretches from Southern
New Jersey to Georgia. On the Areas of Biodiversity map, the scale shows that
there is mixed conservation value within the Town limits. Areas along the shoreline
are classified within the 7-10 range which depicts areas of maximum conservation
value, while areas inland are in the range of moderate conservation value. Data
that is taken into accord for this scale include significant natural heritage areas,
rare species occurrences, core wildlife habitats, important aquatic resources,
wetlands, and watershed priorities based on Federally -listed species and other
factors. The White Oak River Basin encompasses the majority of the Town and
provides aquatic habitats for 8 species of fish, mussels and crayfish.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)
Based on the NC Wildlife Action Plan, the SAV is extremely valuable to the fish
habitats that are within the coastal estuarine and freshwater systems of North
Carolina. Submerged aquatic vegetation provides ecosystem functions similar to
shell bottom, such as enhancing water quality through stabilizing and trapping
sediment, reducing wave energy, cycling nutrients within the system, and providing
structure for invertebrate attachment and refuge from predators. Seagrasses also
produce large quantities of organic matter, which supports a complex food base for
coastal fishes and other organisms.
Damage to these areas can come from boating activities, bottom disturbing fishing
gears, bottom dredging activities, and shoreline development including building
docks and marinas, infrastructure projects, water quality degredation, nuisance
species introduction, and other items. On the included Areas of Biodiversity map
are the current submerged aquatic vegetation locations within the Town limits and
surrounding environs.
Areas with Excessive Slope and High Erosion Potential
The topography of Cape Carteret rises from the sound shore to 40 feet above
mean sea level (msl). In the area between NC 24 and the shoreline, the maximum
elevation is approximately 25 feet msl. North of NC 24, elevations generally are
above 20 feet msl with one area reaching nearly 40 feet msl. Along most of the
northern town limits, Pettiford Creek is characterized by a bluff which rises sharply
to above 10 feet msl.
3.2.11 Additional Natural Features of Concern
There are no other natural features of concern identified by the Town.
•i
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r -i
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

�.00,
� . r
■
iiiiiiii�E � • � ;P � � � ♦
liiiir � ♦
- IZ �..� Legend
• j • • ► • Town of Cape Carteret
■ ■ �'� ♦ E.3Boundary
■ �� ■ �� �. • NCDEQ - Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation Habitat
rI#L IM Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
• � ������-in BiodiversityMildlife
• s Habitat
1 P� •' Relative Conservation
• Value
9-10 (Maximum)
iIr'J 0
�° F—] 6
5
• �
o
F 2-4
■ 1 1 (Moderate)
• L0 (Unrated)
Impervious surface >20• Av��E � , �
■ =r I�v��
■
� A� oaNE oEE � b
` ��
. _ .aarn
e .
e
sit
*b b AI N
`°ae�8°s�°--
dW1,050 1,400
yy.'L°gC `� -- • eTBs+Y'"-ux_v2r."'�e°°r"aC-a C- _ - Feat
� o,mSUMMIT'� �
e �
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 69

3.3 Environmental Conditions
3.3.1 Water Quality Assessment
Cape Carteret is within the White Oak River Basin, which is covered by the Draft
2021 White Oak River Basin Water Resources Plan. Basinwide planning identifies
areas that need additional protection, restoration, or preservation to ensure the
waters of the state are meeting their designated use. Basin plans are required by
North Carolina law and are produced every 10 years. Updates are made reflecting
changes in resources, modeling, methodology, wastewater permits, or advances in
science.
While the plan is prepared by the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality's Water Resource division, its implementation requires the coordinated
efforts of federal and state agencies, local governments, and stakeholder groups,
hence why it is included as a requirement of a CAMA plan.
White Oak River Basin Northeast HUC (03020301)
The White Oak River basin is located between the southeast portion of the Cape
Fear River basin and southwest portion of the Neuse River basin. The Atlantic coast
forms the southeast boundary of the basin. The basin includes the eastern portion
of the City of Wilmington within the southwest portion of the basin, the City of
Jacksonville within the central portion of the basin and Morehead City within the
eastern portion of the basin. The boundaries of the basin include most of Onslow
County, almost half of Carteret County, and the southeast portions of New Hanover,
Duplin, and Pender counties, the southeast portion of Jones and Craven counties
and a tiny portion of southeast Brunswick County.
The White Oak River Basin lies entirely within the Coastal Plain and is composed
of four small river systems (New River, White Oak River, Newport River, and
North River), which all drain south directly into the Atlantic Ocean and associated
sounds (Back, Core and Bogue sounds). The White Oak River is approximately 40
miles long and is a blackwater river. This basin encompasses 1,382 square miles,
making it the smallest basin contained entirely within the state. There are 1,571
stream miles, 3,777 acres of freshwater lakes and impoundments, and 1,641
miles of coastline in the basin (NCDWR 2015). Due to the location and size of this
basin, there is a relatively small amount of freshwater habitat available, but what
is available has the characteristics typical of Coastal Plain streams: meandering
waters associated with swamps, hardwood bottomlands, and wetland communities
(NCDWQ 2003).
Land Cover in the subbasin area is summarized in the table below. 3.3.1-1 Surface
Water Quality
70
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2CR -N C AaO�`�P

The 2021 White Oak River Basin Plan lists Cape Carteret's waterbodies as impaired
due to their designation as Shellfish Growing Areas. Sources of impairment in the
Basin include chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, fecal coliform, enterococcus,
and copper. The 2021 basinwide report recommends:
• Continue to improve strategies for reducing nonpoint source pollution and
minimize cumulative losses. This can be done through voluntary programs,
actions, assistance, and improving methods to control stormwater runoff from
agriculture, forestry, and urban areas.
• To prevent additional shellfish closures and swimming advisories, conduct
targeted water quality restoration activities.
• Maintain adequate water quality conducive to the support of present and future
mariculture in public trust waters.
• Reduce nonpoint source pollution from large-scale animal operations by
ensuring proper oversight and management of animal waste management
systems, and certified operator compliance with permit and operator
requirements and management plan for animal waste management systems.
• Increase financial support for the implementation of voluntary Best
Management Practices throughout the basin. Several voluntary programs exist
through the local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) and Natural
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). The SWCD, NRCS, and the Cooperative
Extension Offices (CES) can also provide guidance on managing agricultural
lands, forests, riparian buffers, and stormwater runoff.
• Encourage local governments to develop watershed restoration plans to
reduce stormwater runoff, implement living shorelines and soft erosion control
structures, and encourage nature -based stormwater strategies to foster water
and habitat protection.
• Continue to work collaboratively with federal, state, and local resource agencies
to understand water resource issues (quality and quantity).
Section 303(d) of the Clean
Water Act requires every state
to develop a list of waterbodies
that are not meeting water
quality standards or have
impaired uses. Listed waters
must be prioritized and a
management strategy or total
maximum daily load must be
subsequently developed for all
listed waters.
The 2020 303(d) Impaired
Waters List includes 77.8 acres
of Deer Creek, and portions of
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 71

the Bogue Sound HUC (03020301) as identified impaired waters. The impaired use
is shellfish harvesting due to elevated fecal coliform levels. These bodies have been
impaired since 2002.
Pettiford Creek is also categorized as an impaired waterway for shellfish harvesting,
but is not a 303(d) designated waterbody. Samples have been collected in this
stream since 1998 and there has been little to no change.
3.3.1-2 Shellfishing Waters
The North Carolina Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality Section of
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is responsible for protecting
the consuming public from shellfish and crustacea which could cause illness. Rules
and regulations following national guidelines have been implemented to ensure
the safety of harvesting waters and the proper sanitation of establishments which
process shellfish and crustacea for sale to the general public. Waters are sampled
regularly and closed if levels of fecal coliform indicate that harvesting shellfish from
those waters could cause a public health risk.
Shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, etc.) provide a favorable environment for the
coastal and estuarine waters in which they are grown. In turn, shellfish farming can
provide local communities with a variety of ecosystem services, whose value can
be quantified. Our native eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) is one of the most
important species in our estuaries. Oysters benefit North Carolina's coastal ecology
and economy. These benefits can be summarized and referred to as the three "Fs',
for short: food, filter and fish habitat. They filter water, provide food for humans
and create reefs that build homes for more fish. These environmental benefits, in
turn, support jobs and provide economic opportunities for coastal communities.
The draft White Oak River Basin 2021 plan states that there has been little overall
change in bacteriological water quality or pollution source impacts in this growing
area.
The Division of Marine Fisheries is responsible for classifying all coastal waters as to
their suitability for shellfish harvesting for human consumption. Shellfish growing
waters can be classified as "Approved", "Conditionally Approved', "Restricted', or
"Prohibited". Approved areas are consistently open to harvest, while Prohibited
areas are off limits for shellfish harvest. Conditionally Approved areas can be open
to harvest under certain conditions, such as dry weather when stormwater runoff
is not having an impact on surrounding water quality, and Restricted waters can be
used for harvest at certain times as long as the shellfish are subjected to further
cleansing before they are made available for consumption. Prohibited/Closed
shellfishing areas include portions of Pettiford Creek, Deer Creek, and areas of the
Bogue Sound within Cape Carteret's planning area. Grow areas, which are areas
suitable for shellfish harvesting are limited to the White Oak River Area D-3 and the
Deer Creek Area D-4 shown in blue and are classified as SA/ORW.
Increased closures of polluted shellfish harvesting waters are an indicator of poor
water quality, which has public health, economic, and cultural impacts. Eating
72
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

polluted shellfish can make people sick with illnesses such as Shigella, Salmonella,
and Hepatitis A. One downfall of the increased shellfish closures is that it reduces
access to various commercial shellfish fisheries that are economically beneficial to
the state and citizens involved in the industry.
The benefit for Cape Carteret and the surrounding areas for pursuing "Approved"
status for open shellfish harvesting areas, is that it provides communities with
a better quality of shellfish, as well as keeps the shellfishing economy vibrant.
Closed shellfishing areas prevent the negative public, environmental, and economic
impacts from affecting the Town, however the Town should plan alongside other
jurisdictions to improve water quality.
Land uses that impact shellfishing waters include the conversion of undeveloped
and underdeveloped land to more intensive land uses which creates increased
stormwater runoff. Effective stormwater mitigation is critical for protecting the
public health and the economic ramifications of shellfish area closures.
3.3.1-3 Areas with Water Quality Issues
Water pollution is caused by a number of substances including sediment, nutrients,
bacteria, oxygen -demanding wastes and toxic substances such as heavy metals,
chlorine and pesticides. Sources of these pollutants are divided into two general
categories: point sources and nonpoint sources.
Point sources are basically discharges that enter surface waters through a pipe,
ditch, or other well-defined point of discharge and often include discharges from
wastewater treatment plants or large urban and industrial stormwater systems.
Within the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction, there are no major point source
dischargers.
Nonpoint sources generally include stormwater runoff from small urban areas (less
than 100,000 population), forestry, mining, agricultural lands and other. Examples
of the types of land use activities that can serve as sources of nonpoint pollution
include land development, construction, crop production, animal feeding lots,
failing septic systems, landfills, roads, and parking lots. Fecal coliform bacteria and
nutrients are major pollutants associated with nonpoint source pollution. Unlike
point source pollution, nonpoint pollution sources are diffuse in nature and occur
at random intervals depending on rainfall frequency and intensity. Within the Cape
Carteret planning jurisdiction, the primary water pollution sources of estuarine
waters are estimated to be multiple nonpoint sources including: agriculture,
forestry, urban runoff, septic tank runoff, and marinas. The Cape Carteret planning
area features large roads such as, Highway 24, with strip commercial development
including gas stations on the north side. To the south towards the sound, there
are many aging properties in low lying areas that feature septic tanks that require
better maintenance and monitoring due to occasional failures. Collectively, these
nonpoint sources impact the local waterbodies and the public's health.
Activities that contribute to the closure of shellfish harvesting areas include, but are
not limited to, construction, urban stormwater runoff, failing septic systems, and
agricultural activities. Control of these types of activities includes a wide variety of
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 73

state agencies, local health departments, local municipal and county governments,
and private property owners. There is no prescriptive remedy to solve the problem
of closed shellfish waters; rather, it will require collaboration and coordination to
achieve the common goal of protecting and restoring shellfish waters and improving
water quality.
3.3.2 Natural Hazards
Severe thunderstorms are a common threat to the Cape Carteret area, producing
lightning, high velocity winds, and hail. North Carolina's Division of Emergency
Management's 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan has identified numerous natural
hazards, including flooding, hurricanes, severe winter weather, excessive heat,
earthquakes, wildfire, drought, tornadoes/thunderstorms, and infectious disease.
Cape Carteret is particularly at risk of hurricanes and tropical storms routinely
impacting the area as well as high winds, waterspouts, hail, winter storms, and
floods. Wildfires are also a moderate risk for the Cape Carteret area due to the
adjacent Croatan National Forest. In the future, weather events may be more
extreme as a result of rising levels and warming of oceans leading to more severe
damage.
Cape Carteret participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and
reports 163 polices in force totaling $45,894,800.00 insurance in force with 99 total
losses and $937,442.00 in total payments according to the 2018 State of North
Carolina Hazard Mitigation Plan.
3.3.2-1 Flood Zones
Cape Carteret's planning area features flood zones on the northern boundaries
along Pettiford Creek and the southern boundaries along the Bogue Sound and
Deer Creek. Many parcels and streets south of Highway 24 are at risk of recurrent
flooding (see page 59 for Flood Zone Map).
3.3.2-2 Storm Surge Inundation
As discussed in section 3.2.5 Storm Surge Areas, much of the Cape Carteret
planning area is threatened by storm surges. Only the golf course remains above
water in the event of a Category 5 storm. Future and more dense development
should be oriented towards higher ground areas of Cape Carteret and the lower
lying areas along the Bogue Sound should be maintained as low density residential
areas with development standards that assist in protecting the buildings.
3.3.2-3 Areas Experiencing Significant Shoreline Erosion
There are no areas in the Cape Carteret planning area experiencing significant
shoreline erosion.
74
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

3.3.3 Natural Resources
Environmentally fragile areas and natural resource areas that may be impacted as a
result of incompatible development. Identified environmentally fragile areas include
AECs, flood hazard areas, storm surge areas, and non -coastal wetlands. Natural
resource areas include Significant Natural Heritage Areas.
3.3.3-1 Environmentally Fragile Areas
Cape Carteret has some lots for single family homes located along Pettiford Creek
as well as near Deer Creek. However, newly built homes must comply with Cape
Carteret's development standards and do not encroach on environmentally fragile
areas. New development will be directed away from these areas.
3.3.3-2 Areas with Incompatible Development
New development in general exacerbates the problematic flooding that Cape
Carteret experiences. There are existing single family homes and lots well within
the floodplain of Deer Creek, Pettiford Creek, and the Bogue Sound. These areas
are to remain low density limited to single family homes with this Plan to prevent
any further encroachment or incompatible development. New development in the
Town will feature innovative stormwater features to mitigate impacts to natural
resources.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 75

3.4 Existing Land Use
3.4.1 Land Use
Classifications
Existing Land Use By
Type and Acreage
Cape Carteret Planning
Jurisdiction
The most predominant
2021
land use in Cape Carteret
2021 Percent,
is single-family residential,
,21
Land Use AcreagesDeveloped
21 Percent of
Total -.,-
accounting for 1,167
Acr_
'g_
parcels, or 73% of parcels
Single Family
605.2
56.2%
27.5%
Residential
within Town limits.
Manufactured Home-
I 13.49
"
1.3%
0.6%
Each residential
neighborhood has different
Personal
----"-"-"-"-"J"-"-"-"-"
ufactuedHome- I 4476
Permanent
"-"-"-"-"-"
4.2%
-"-"-"-"-"-
2.0%
characteristics which are
-"-"-"-"-----"-"-"-"
"-"-"-"-"-"
-"-"-
affected by the size of the
Residential/ Commercial 0.47
0.0%
parcels, the year built,
"-- "-"-"-_
I
_
"-"-"-0.0%
-
Multi -Family 2-4 Units 0.45
0.0%
0.0%
and the materials used,
-------------------
"-"-"-"-"-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
as well as the number of
Condos I 1.7
0.2%
0.1%
mature trees. Whatever
-"-"-"-"-"-"-"J"---
"-"-"-"-"-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
their differences, all of
Commercial 100.74
9.3%
4.6%
Cape Carteret s residential
-"-"-"-"-"-"----
_ -"-"-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
neighborhoods offer a high
Business Professional
0.6%
0.3%0-
quality of life, which Is
"-"-6.95
Community Facilities/" 10.69
1.0%
I
"-"-"
0.5%
one of the most significant
Government-"-"-" "-"-
""-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
reasons the Town is such a
Institutional 29.6
-"-"-----"-"
2.7%
1.3%
desirable place to live.
-"-"-"-"-"-"-" -
-"-"-"-"-"-
Golf Course I 235.79
21.9%
10.7%
The commercial uses are
- - ,"J-
-"-"-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
oriented to NC 58 and NC
Churches/Cemeteries/ 14.49
Lodges
1.3%
0.7%
24 and serve both Town
-
residents, residents of other
Utilities I 13.116
0.6%-
area localities, and tourists/
Undeveloped/Common 112.1
Areas
"-"-"-1.2%
"-"-"
5.1%
visitors. The predominant
characteristic of these
Undeveloped/ 318.22
o
14.5/0
Forestland
highway -oriented uses are
-"` -"-" -"
-"-"-"-"-
large parking lots, wide
Marshland 52.71
2.4%
driveways or entrances and
-"-
"-"-"-"
-"-"-"-"-"-
drive-through windows.
water/Row 639.4
29.1%
This chart shows the
Cape Carteret ETJ
797.65
percentage of each land use
Total Developed Land
1077.49
by both developed and total
__
_____-___
_____
__________
acreage.
Totals Land Use ACS
I 1560.52
Total Cape Carteret
2199.92
100%
100 /o °
Acreage
76

j
'1 ae
Ir�
p o�'�a �Do ,o
��/. `..Jp V r
❑ a dQ
.a O Ooo4d wb, DPI/
0 4
e0> n o 0
o� o 0o B a a
NS
, t P�t • • c ■ ��
E . �Il ��Y �• t '� 1
It 4
•
• v �^-.� Ft�� •�"E� � die �d� c��,.� ♦ •�
Legend
Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
E : J Cape Carteret ETJ
Existing Bike Path
Existing Land Use
Land Use Classifications
Residential
Manufactured Home - Personal
_ Manufactured Home - Permanent
® Residential/Commercial
_ Multi -Family 2-4 Units
Condos
- Commercial
- Business Professional
- Community Facilities/Government
_ Institutional
_ Golf Course
_ Churches/Cemeteries/Lodges
- Utilities
Undeveloped/Common Areas
® Undeveloped/Forestland
y Marshland
F, N
A
0 775350 700 7.050 7.400
®Feet
MAY 2027
,._mSUMMff
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22
77

3.4.2 Land Use Patterns within Watersheds
The Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction is located within two 14-digit watersheds
(Pettiford Creek, #03020106020030 and Deer Creek, #03020106020040) as
delineated by the Natural Resource Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. These two watersheds are located within HUC 03020301 of the White
Oak River Basin. The Pettiford Creek watershed encompasses roughly the northern
one-half of the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction. The predominant land use within
this watershed is low density single-family residences, but the largest, single land
use is the Star Hill Golf and Country Club. Several large, undeveloped tracts are
within this watershed and are located primarily in the northern and northeastern
portions of the town's Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) area.
Some of the land in this area is held by a land trust and, therefore, will not be
developed in the foreseeable future. The NC Highway 58 corridor is perhaps
the most heavily developed portion of this watershed and includes a mixture of
commercial and residential land uses.
The Deer Creek watershed encompasses the most intensively developed portions
of the Cape Carteret planning jurisdiction. Again, the predominant land use is low
density single-family residences and includes the Country Club, Country Club Point,
Cape Point, Bayshore Park, Fox Forest, and Quail Wood Acres Subdivisions.
Commercial and institutional land uses within this watershed are chiefly located
along the NC Highway 24 corridor and in the northeast corner of the NC Highway
24/58 intersection, with the GYM at Cape Carteret Aquatic Center and the Town
Library on Taylor Notion Drive. Institutional land uses within this watershed include
White Oak Elementary School and the Cape Carteret Town Hall facilities. The
majority of the vacant, undeveloped land in this watershed is located along the
north and south sides of NC Highway 24. Many vacant lots are also located within
the residential subdivisions delineated above.

3.4.3 Description of Existing Land Uses
3.4.3-1 Residential (All Types)
The residential classification includes all residential structural types and densities,
including Residential, Manufactured Home - Personal, Manufactured Home -
Permanent, Multi -family 2-4 Units, Condos, and Residential/Commercial units. The
majority of residential uses in Cape Carteret are low density, detached single-family
residences at densities of 1-2 dwelling units per acre. There are a few duplex and
multi -unit structures.
Since the last CAMA plan was adopted in 2007, 194 homes have been built in Cape
Carteret, including the Star Hill North subdivision. The homes built outside of Star
Hill were infill development in existing neighborhoods.
There are seven primary areas of residential land uses:
1. The Cape Carteret Subdivision located west of Deer Creek between NC
Highway 24 and Bogue Sound
2. The Country Club Point Subdivision located east of Deer Creek and north of
Bogue Sound
3. The Bayshore Park Subdivision located north of the Country Club Point
Subdivision and south of NC Highway 24
4. The Star Hill Subdivision located on the northeast side of Taylor Notion Road
generally between NC Highway 24 and Pettiford Creek
5. The Fox Forest Subdivision located southeast of Star Hill Drive and north of
NC Highway 24
6. The Quailwood Acres Subdivision located east of Star Hill Road at the
terminus of Pine Lake Road
7. Cape Point Subdivision located between NC 24 and Deer Creek, and Star Hill
North, Section II subdivision along Hopeland Road.
Of the 1,181 dwelling units located in Cape Carteret in 2019, over 88 percent were
single-family residences, less than 1 percent were multi -family dwellings, and 12
percent were manufactured homes. Cape Carteret's proportion of single-family
dwellings to other unit types is considerably higher than Carteret County and
statewide.
The majority of the existing manufactured homes are located within the Bayshore
Park Subdivision. The majority of recent construction has been single-family
residential.
Of the residential construction since 2007, 93 percent (180 homes) were single-
family detached dwellings and 7 percent (14 homes) were manufactured homes.
The 2007 plan predicted that the majority of future residential land uses are
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 79

expected to be infill development within existing
neighborhoods. This plan recommends that
there be future residential units built as part of
a walkable Main Street area that will become the
center of Town. Infill development in existing
neighborhoods that fits the existing development
patterns will also be appropriate, and new
subdivisions outside of flood prone areas. All
new development should include the stormwater
infrastructure to ensure that it does not add to
existing flooding concerns.
3.4.3-2 Commercial/(Business Professional)
Uses in this classification include highway
commercial, general retail, as well as office and
service uses. Uses identified by this classification
include but are not limited to: restaurants, grocery stores, convenience stores, gift
shops, and professional service establishments. Most of the commercially -used
land is located in the northeastern corner of the NC Highway 24/58 intersection
and adjacent to the north side of the NC Highway 24 corridor. Smaller commercial
areas are located along the south side of the NC Highway 24 corridor through the
length of the Town. This plan recommends that future commercial and mixed -use
development be in a medium -density, mixed -use, walkable Main Street center.
3.4.3-3 Governmental / Institutional / Community Facilities
Uses in this category include the local White Oak Elementary School, Western
Carteret Library, and the local Cape Carteret government center. These uses are
located along or just off of Highway 24. The category also includes the boat launch
on Manatee St. These uses serve the community by providing education, event
programming, and access to the water. Together, they comprise approximately
3.8% of the community's developed acreage or a total of 41 acres. This plan calls
for continuing to enhance these facilities with amenities for the community.
3.4.3-4 Golf Course
The golf course comprises 235.79 acres or approximately 21.9% of Cape Carteret's
developed acreage. The land that the golf course occupies is surrounded by
residential homes and is the highest elevation in the Cape Carteret planning
area, protecting it from projected flood levels under a Category 5 hurricane. In
the future, this may be an area to examine for alternative uses depending on the
environmental challenges faced due to increased storm events and flooding.
3.4.3-5 Churches/Cemeteries/Lodges
This land use category includes the Cape Carteret Presbyterian Church and
Baptist Church located off of Highway 24 and comprises 14.5 acres or 1.3% of the
developed acreage in the community.
,01
OF CAPE C9
s' A
o m
r _1
2CRTH C AaO�`�P

3.4.3-6 Utilities
This category includes the electric utility substation between Highway 24 and
Taylor Notion Rd. as well as the private wastewater facility behind the Lowe's Home
Improvement Center. This use comprises 13.2 acres or 1.2% of the developed land
area of Cape Carteret. Depending on the future of the private wastewater facility
any provision of public wastewater connectivity, the extent of this use will change.
3.4.3-7 Undeveloped / Forestland & Common Areas
There are 316.6 acres or 14.4% of Cape Carteret's area that is undeveloped /
forestland. Some of this land may be cleared for development in the future,
however, this plan calls for as much preservation of foliage as possible with
development for environmental benefits. Undeveloped / Common Areas are parcels
of land that have been cleared of trees and have only grass cover. They comprise
112 acres of Cape Carteret's planning area.
3.4.3-8 Marshland
Marshland comprises 52.71 acres or 2.4% of Cape Carteret's planning area. These
areas are protected and should not be encroached upon by development for the
protection of local waterbodies and environmental benefits.
3.4.3-9 Water
639.4 acres or 29.1% of the Cape Carteret area is comprised of water. The waters
of Cape Carteret are impaired due mostly to nonpoint pollution from the watershed
of the White Oak River Basin and the Bogue Sound. Cape Carteret's existence is
tied to the the health of its waterbodies. This plan seeks to improve water quality.
3.4.4 Historic, Cultural and Scenic Areas
The Cape Carteret planning area contains many archaeologically sensitive sites.
The North Carolina Division of Archives and History has identified 11 sites that
they deem significantly important. All of these sites have been disturbed by urban
development. However, artifacts from the various indigenous Native American tribes
that inhabited the region could still be found and as a result, the NC Division of
Archives and History has recommended that plans for further development in these
areas be carefully reviewed. The policy of the Office of State Archaeology is not to
disclose the location of such sites in public documents. Any further development
that would adversely impact the sites is subject to applicable state and/or federal
laws and regulations. There are no historic structures in the Cape Carteret area.
3.4.5 Development Trends and Future Land Needs
This plan makes assumptions that are different from the previous plan. Future
needs for certain land uses are not based on straight line projections; land use
decisions made by the Town can affect where people live, work and shop on a
regional and County -wide level. Changes in land use patterns and their trajectory
are necessary to provide Cape Carteret with the amenities residents desire.
Future development should be dense in the Main Street area to add uses such as
restaurants, stores or offices, and housing units.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 81

�n`°.voaA�
❑
,now
o
1v
'
■
r
K
� ♦ w
� 7
y •
Legend
Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
�� • j m� +s,���' Zoning Classifications
. 'M.
Zone Type
• \ • ♦ ♦ o R-10 Residential (Single Family)
a
• ® R-10 M Residential (Multi -family)
4- - R-13 Residential (Single-family)
♦�.•�� a - R-20 Residential (Low Density Single-family)
o R-30 Residential (Low Density Single-family)
• - B-10 Business & Professional Offices
j>< • * • - B-20 Retail Sales & Shopping Center
• °°^" "- • ■ . ' - B-20 CU Conditional Use District
wa . • :.
'� ; � � • � � B-30 Light Industrial
ETJ R-10 M (Extra Territorial Jurrisdiction)
■ * ' ` ETJ R-30 (Extra Territorial Jurrisdiction)
■ � 1 ec � � a
•�
e°w
a
:1
N
. _ '. 0 175350 700 1.050 1.400
__ .� ®Feet
. .. . MAY 2021
.� — mSUMMIT
RM

3.5 Community Facilities
3.5.1 Water System
Cape Carteret receives water from the West Carteret Community Water Corporation
(WC CWC), a nonprofit community water association that provides water service to
a total of approximately 1,171 customers within the Cape Carteret limits, where 99
percent of which are residential users. The WC CWC has 7,662 residential customers
and 76 non-residential customers as of 2020 for a total of 7,738 within their service
area of Carteret County. Currently, the water supply comes from five (5) 10-inch
wells, one (1) 12- inch well and two (2) 6-inch wells located in the Croatan National
Forest. The average depth of the wells is 280 feet. The water is pumped from the
Castle Hayne Aquifer and distributed to the various localities situated along NC
Highways 58 and 24. The system has a current available supply from groundwater
wells of 3.0640 MGD and a total treatment capacity of 2.55 MGD. The average
daily use in 2020 was 1.140 MG with a peak daily use of 1.895 MG. The total
treated water storage capacity is 2.1 MG in three elevated tanks, This would include
2- 750,000 gallon tanks and one 650,000 gallon tank. The system consists of
approximately 183 miles of distribution line primarily along the NC Highway 24 and
58 corridors in the White Oak Township of Carteret County. The White Oak Township
consists of Peletier, Cedar Point, Cape Carteret, Bogue, and Emerald Isle.
According to the WC CWC, the total number of meter connections in the Cape
Carteret corporate limits in 2020 is 1,171. Some of these meter connections are
not being utilized year-round. Based on this number of total customers (residential,
commercial, and institutional), Cape Carteret was billed for 44,023,670 MG within
2020. This breaks down to 120,612 GPD within the Town and averages out to be
approximately 103 GPD per customer. This is primarily due to the seasonal nature
of this area or because of the customers' wishes to suspend billing on their account.
West Carteret Water Corporation is a voluntary system so homeowners can utilize
their meter or a well. The largest commercial water user in 2020 in Cape Carteret
was Lowes Foods. The existing WC CWC water system in the Cape Carteret which
includes an area bounded by Morehead City ETJ, Town of Newport ETJ, Bogue
Sound, Swansboro, and Jones County is delineated in Water Service Area Map.
According to the WC CWC's 2020 Water Supply Plan, one additional well with a
total supply of .4320 MGD is planned to be online in 2025 to augment the existing
available water supply, thereby increasing the total available supply to 3.496 MGD.
Projected average daily demand is expected to increase from the current level of
1.137 MGD to 1.1823 MGD by 2030 or 34 percent of the total available supply.
Average daily water demand is not projected to exceed 80 percent of available
water supply through 2050. Based upon the estimated peak population in the Cape
Carteret planning jurisdiction and an average consumption rate of 103 gallons of
water per person per day, the projected future average water demand totals were
1,182,300 GPD in 2030, 1,236,100 GPD in 2040 and 1,291,100 GPD in 2050.
Water system extensions are anticipated in the area bounded by Taylor Notion Road,
NC Highway 58, and NC Highway 24 where the largest amount of new development
is expected to occur. Also, water system extensions are projected along the
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 83

:1,

northeastern boundary of the existing ETJ as new residential developments are built
in this area.
There are no private wells within the Town as the soil suitability and water table will
not allow it.
3.5.2 Wastewater Treatment Systems
Cape Carteret currently does not have a public wastewater system. Wastewater
disposal is provided by individual subsurface disposal systems or by privately -owned
package treatment plants. Information regarding private individual subsurface
disposal systems in the Cape Carteret area is not available.
Private septic systems are common throughout North Carolina. Most are located
in rural or small town areas that fall outside of a regional wastewater treatment
plant's service area. Unfortunately, many citizens fail to properly care for their
septic systems. Improper maintenance leads to failing systems that may pollute
nearby waters. A regular maintenance program benefits the effort to preserve
water quality. Regular inspections by local governments can encourage proper
maintenance.
Lack of wastewater treatment capacity is the most significant barrier to future
development in Cape Carteret, and new facilities must be created in order to realize
the vision of this plan. Private septic systems on residential properties must be
built or retrofitted in a way to protect from leaking during flooding and storm
events.
In order for the Town Center concept to become a reality, the existing private
wastewater packing plant in that area, on which most of the commercial entities
in the Lowe's shopping center rely, must be updated and expanded to have a far
greater capacity. There are multiple ways of organizing and funding this expansion,
the details of which can be agreed upon between the Town and the private facility
owner.
The current facility within the Town has a permit to opertate at 50,000 GPD but
only operates at approximately 31,000 GPD. According to the County, there have
been no issues documented that may degarde water quality or constitute a threat
to public health. Over the past few years there has been one tank replacement and
no proposals have been submitted to increase or upgrade the wastewater system
based on population projections. With new growth, new plans would be created.
The map to the right shows generally the area currently served by private packing
systems (in green). Lowe's Home Improvement is on its own system, while
Lowe's Foods, Mac Daddy's and other commercial uses rely on the existing private
system. The area in purple shows the
general area that could be serviced
with upgraded wastewater service.
The existing single-family residential
neighborhoods are all on septic and
are expected to remain so.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 85

�o o
a n d
Aoo o q
o
w -
p Pq�RI( C,RCLE
�J
'<77 8oem�e
� mo
O
B O o p o m
� o e
� 0
0
F 0
ooaq
lOa � o o �R�KORP
11 HI�LS ROAD
04 00
'x %&
•
A'
• '. • CL Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
q o WasteWater Systems
- Exisitng
% zg Proposed
4
a
i � D
� i • �j Q i J o
■ r u y O
� � • W
•� P�EQo o �'a o l
• Go o 0
1
N
0 175350 700 7.050 IADO
®Feet
MAY 2021
m SUMMIT I
i•

3.5.3 Stormwater System
The map on the following page depicts the existing drainage facilities within the
Town of Cape Carteret that consists of a stormwater system primarily made up of
small (12-inch diameter and smaller) corrugated plastic piping, open grate catch
basins, and drainage ditches and/or swales.
In 2001, the Town of Cape Carteret completed a stormwater mapping project to
address issues related to water quality and flooding of property. The phases of
this project involved the accurate mapping of the existing stormwater facilities
and the identification of potential problem areas as well as reviewing the identified
problem areas with the Town staff and outlining a course of action to address each
problem area. Recommendations for piping and ditching improvements were
made for 15 problem areas in the 2001 plan. Many of these improvements were
implemented over time on Star Hill Drive, Sutton Drive, Pine Lake Road, Gemini
Court, Park Avenue, and Sound View Court. Additionally the improvements that
were planned on Pine Lake Road, Loma Linda Court, and Channel View Drive
have been completed. Some components of the system are still currently owned
and maintained by the Town or NCDOT, while others are privately owned and
maintained. Flooding has been particularly problematic in the lower areas south of
Hwy. 24. This Plan calls for the implementation of innovative stormwater methods
such as bioswales, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or retention ponds that trap
and slow water to reduce flooding where possible with new development. Public
facilities should also use their grounds for implementation of new stormwater
management facilities.
New coordinated efforts need to be undertaken to ensure the timely implementation
of innovative stormwater facilities for Cape Carteret's resilience to flooding and
ctnrm Px/Pntc
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 87

r.
This map depicts the
Stormwater system with Q a
Q o
inlet types, pipe sizes and °
other relevant items within
the Town limits. j
f � � — � ♦ a �� a t t • t � •• • •• tS
o o • � 1 i � .�,f �♦ e t • 0 4 O
5 tl r ■ ♦ .♦'
Ilk
4D� 0 0 t �� � � • r r �♦
u � e ® '• •1 • • • ♦ • o 0 0
t • • &__.
o t
' ♦ ♦ • N e0 gTli
♦ •� �� ❑ Legend
/ • • . I • / • • r r 'Tn o - or Cape Carteret Boundary
• O 0 • Manholes
•• w ♦/ t r t , f O Q o D o Q Jancron Boxes
area
• . A � a g 9 • • • — Drtcn or Swale
/ f ,
• � � o d TYPE OF INLET
----"n«eono__./ • ♦ `+ • p o 6 ❑ A,Ca Basin; Open Grate Area=
a> _ .• o O 3.25sgft
a _ _
B,Ca: Basin; Open Gate Area =
Q° ♦ 6 T �� / ❑ C,Cmn Beam; Open crate Area =
3.125 sg ft
800 0d'd O gib ■ DC.. Inlet; Open Grate Area=
1 0 3.33 sq ft; Thmt=TxT
o. a E.Cu� Inlet Open Diane Am 0
o r �Q
• u O ■ F,15' DIA. Clean On/Inlet
G,Cass, Basin;aOpen Gterea A=
• . r • u, • O s,,Q ■ 3.25sgft
0 � ouuLreurv— /• I a O � u �'rp ■ H,12"DIA. Clean Out/Inlet
O •
■ J.Basin, Open Grate Area=
.• \ Q � 0.281287 sq R
• 11 • 's • �' ,O o L,Catch Basin; Open Gala Aaa=
M,Camli Be in; Open Gate Area=
o ve.... • • • • ©op t} ■ 4.667 aq ft
=� s I • e » ■ N,Ca1ca Basin; Open Gate Area =
3.67 area
• ❑ S- p ,W' II I • • k • ---- , STORMWATER PIPE SIZE
z ii • 5'RCBC
• A' ��A a • • • I • d -4•PVC
9 53 p e o 0 8.
o ❑ a 9
® � •. C a \ . � I j • � / � �10•STEEL PIPE
• • ;} CV'D eO 4 r'aY� O SSd 4 C o� 4?p/ i —WCPP
• 1 • ` • e mow o �. f O T P PdQ a — 10. PVC
t \ • � • c0
• n
0 a ® ♦ • Y • ` OY o • — 12• RCP
�:p9 • • • • O 0 • —75•CPP
• i
d o • • • ± •/ •\� j • � 78• RCP
gs�'�0 • • / • / • �' ••�\ • I �78'CMP
'IA • • • • a
3 'Aqq 6'"At e • f ' ♦ r =24•
D 3 g44p"\0 \ •��� • ,\ • .• • 1 rr2IRCP
vOp (p\p0\.\ •. \ �,r ` • rr�24•CMP
5 • a� �\\ Gl : �38'
RCP
D IS
�d2
•
` NN
Source: West Carteret _ —_ 0 775350 700 7.050 7.400Feet
Water Corporation . .�••�••�••—••--- ••
- ®
r• MAY 2027
M SUMMIT
F• •7

3.5.4 Transportation System
The Town of Cape Carteret maintains over 25 miles of streets within its corporate
limits. Major thoroughfares and other streets outside of the town limits are
maintained by the NC Department of Transportation. The state also has
maintenance responsibility for all bridges in the area. The major road systems in
Cape Carteret, are NC 24 which bisects the Town east to west, and NC 58 which
runs north/south along the western boundary of the Town.
Within the county, the Carteret County -Beaufort Airport Authority manages the
Michael J. Smith airfield located in Beaufort, NC. Cape Carteret is also served by a
private airstrip in the Star Hill area. Along the Carteret coast in Morehead City lies
the North Carolina Port of Morehead City. This is the closest general cargo terminal
facility to the Town of Cape Carteret. Nearby Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
is to the east of theplanning area and is not open to the public.
The Carteret County Transportation Committee, of which Cape Carteret did not
have representation at the time, identified priorities and made recommendations
for transportation improvements within Carteret County. This committee produced
a document in 2014 entitled Transportation Improvement Program Priorities
for Carteret County. The priority of particular concern to Cape Carteret was the
construction of an interchange improvements NC Highway 24 and NC Highway 58.
The improvements was proposed due to the current and projected traffic volumes
on Highway 24 which exceed the capabilities of the current at -grade intersection.
The improvements are also considered necessary to facilitate evacuations from
Bogue Banks during storm threats.
3.5.4-1 Planned and Programmed Roadway Improvements
Proposed Interchange at NC 24 and NC 58, TIP No. R-4721 -- Local ID No.
CART0006-H
Existing NC 24 is projected to be over capacity by 2040 in the vicinity of NC 58 in
Cedar Point. The primary purpose of
this project is to relieve congestion
on the existing facility and construct
a grade separated interchange such
that a minimum of LOS D can be
achieved. TIP No. R-4721 is intended
to address this problem. The proposed
improvements will reduce congestion
on NC 24 and NC 58, create more
connectivity, and improve mobility
in this area of Carteret County. NC
24 is part of the statewide tier of the
NC Multimodal Investment Network
(NCMIN). NC 24 is part of the Strategic
Highway Network (STRAHNET). NC 24 is also part of the Strategic Highway Corridor
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 89

The Town of Cape Carteret supports NCDOT project R-5858
which adds slip lanes to the 24/58 intersection. The Town
has advocated for a metered merge configuration project in
conjunction with the slip lanes to adequately address traffic
stacking and storage needs at the intersection.
The Town advocated for the following projects in
Prioritization 6.0:
Roundabout at Taylor Notion and NC 58
Main Street project
Cape Carteret Trail Project
The town is supportive of efforts to explore the possibility of
a third mid -island bridge to connect with I-42 traffic flow.
The Town is strongly opposed to a grade separated
interchange at 58/24. If one must be constructed it should
remain within the existing right-of-way (tight diamond
interchange with 58 over 24). The town is committed to
opposing any interchange configuration that adversely
impacts our businesses and community.
The Town is opposed to the conversion of Highway 24 to a
super Street (RCI). Installation of raised landscaped curb
at the location of existing painted traffic islands may be a
suitable means of preventing dangerous turning movements.
The Town is adamantly opposed to the elimination of traffic
lights along 24 as they provide a critical means for accessing
the Towns business and residential districts. The town would
be supportive of an additional traffic light to serve Bayshore
Park and Hunting Bay via Fox Drive/Bayshore Drive.

(SHC) Vision Plan. The portion of NC 24 between Cedar Lane (SR 1202) and US 70
in Morehead City is shown as an expressway that needs improvement. NC 58 is part
of the regional tier of the NC Multimodal Investment Network (NCMIN). NC 58 is not
part of the Strategic Highway Corridor. For additional 2-18 information about this
project, including the Purpose and Need, contact NCDOT's Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Unit.
The following routes do not have capacity issues, but are recommended to be
upgraded to two 12-foot lanes with 2-foot paved shoulders to improve safety and
mobility.
• Taylor Notion Road, CART0030-H : From NC 24 to NC 58
The future development trends indicates that the western and central portions of
Carteret County are expected to continue to experience growth pressures during
the planning period. Areas near or adjacent to the White Oak River and Bogue
Sound will continue to attract retirees, vacation -home owners, seasonal visitors,
and others; thus maintaining strong residential and associated development trends.
The NC 24 corridor, from Morehead City to Cape Carteret (including Bogue) and
the NC 58 corridor north of Cape Carteret are expected to experience increasing
development.
LACE UNDIVIDED WITH PAVED SHOULDERS
F05TED 5FEED 25 - 35 MPH
3.5.4-2 NCDOT Functional Classifications
The NCDOT Route Classifications for the Town of Cape Carteret's major
thoroughfares are as follows:
• NC 24 (EB/WB McLean Drive) - Other Principal Arterial
• NC 58 - Minor Arterial
• Taylor Notion Road (between NC 58 & NC 24) - Major Collector
All other roads within the Town are considered a classification of Local.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 91

m
1 ell
��.
°
' • ' _ �....'0
.1 5 ■ e �s g � y � s � -- - •
1 STAR HILL GOLF CLUB �•E'ppO w ' �•���•�� �• — I
t �• 1 y I
• r• , , • Legend
tt ■ `� WO F �� Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
�• ��4. 1 ; �r ! s oy • .' NCDOT Functional Classifications
��` ■ :., Other Principal Arterial
• ; : I1111111111111111111111IMinorArterial
Major Collector
r T
i • ••+ • I i ` ii 1 Local
_ a�rrP � � + 1 ■ ■ •
Si
� 1 •� 1 al '• � 1
• • • 4 1 1 -'et • w♦
Dual x�x y '. I I
♦ Ilt p
k♦ 8 0 is - • ue
• • i . ' • i of w�"i .
♦ ��i `
♦ • r , axE `• 11
i � i � ♦ • • 1
Source: NCDOT 2020-2029 TIP
Functional Classifications
' N
--------- —.
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
-- ---- ®Feet
--� ----- MAY 2021
•--•--- mR MMff
92 li

3.5.4-3 Major Streets with Capacity and other Deficiencies
The following thoroughfares are near or exceeding capacity for traffic volumes; NC
58 between Taylor Notion Rd and Emerald Isle; NC 24 East of NC 58 towards Taylor
Notion Rd; NC 24 West of NC 58 towards Cedar Point. It is estimated in 2040 NC
24 East of Taylor Notion Road, NC 58 North of the Taylor Notion Road intersection,
NC 24 West of NC 58 to the Carteret County boundary and NC 58 South of the NC
24 intersection will have exceeded their capacity for Vehicles Per Day(VPD).
Based on NCDOT figure in the most recent Comprehensive Transportation Plan
released by the NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch, the intersection of NC
58 and NC 24 in Cape Carteret is ranked the highest crash rating within Carteret
County. Also of note, the bridge over Bogue Sound between Cape Carteret and
Emerald Isle is ranked #5 in deficient bridges within Carteret County.
3.5.4-4 Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes for the majority of the streets within the Town are within nominal
limits based on 2020 AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) numbers from NCDOT.
The thoroughfares listed above are the roads in and around the Town that are or
will be affected by the increase in traffic volumes over the next 20 years.
Thoroughfare
Roa•
2010
Volumes
(AADT)
Capacity12040
2010
Capacity
Table 7
Estimates within
2020 2040
Volumes Volumes
(AADT) (AADT)
the Town
2010 Near 2010 Over
Capacity Capacity
2020 Over
Capacity
2040 Over
Capacity
NC 24 (E of Taylor Notion Rd
20,300
30,000
23,000
35,800
X
NC 58 (N of Taylor Notion Rd
9,200
12,000
11,000
14,700
X
NC 24 (W of NC 58)
22,000
28,000
27,500
29,500
X
X
NC 58 (S of NC 24 over Bogue
Sound
15,600
18,000
19,000
22,400
X
X
X
3.5.4-5 Impact of Existing Transportation Facilities on Land Use Patterns
The existing transportation facilities are mostly for the automobile, which
emphasizes and reinforces the low -density residential land use patterns and the
auto -oriented commercial development. By adding multi -modal transportation
connections in the walkable Town Center area and completing the multi -use
path the land use patterns can and will start to be more dense and human scale,
increasing quality of life and reducing vehicular traffic.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 93

3.5.5 Parks, Recreation and Open Space
The Town currently maintains a total of 14 parks which represents 4.16% parks
per capita per person. Cape Carteret continues to enhance and improve its areas
for parks and recreation by providing for quality amenities such as seating or trash
receptacles, and cared for vegetation and landscaping. Parks and recreational space
are important for the community's use for exercise and play. Currently there are no
facilities within the Town with playground elements. This should be noted for future
park amenities. These facilities should be well connected by pedestrian and bicycle
access.
New development around the proposed main street area should include parks and
recreation amenities as part of its design for residential and commercial areas.
The Town recently installed two new kayak storage racks at Holly Lane Park and
Bayshore Pier Park.
3.5.5-1 Public Water/Access Boat Launch
The public access to the water includes the new Pettiford Creek Boat Launch, and
the boat on launch Manatee Street. There are various viewing points and piers
along the Bogue Sound.
The boat launches are maintained to prevent erosion and runoff and should include
amenities such as seating, trash receptacles, or play elements, and landscaping.
Piers should be maintained for safety.
3.5.5-2 Parks and Open Space
Park space includes the Bahia Lane Park and the grounds of the Cape Carteret
government center as well as on Lejeune Road. There is also park space at the The
GYM Cape Carteret Aquatic and Wellness on Taylor Notion Rd., as well as a Town
parking lot for the Cape Carteret Trail in front of the Public Works Department on
Taylor Notion Road. Currently, there is a mulch trail that runs from Taylor Notion
Road to the newly -completed Cape Carteret Trail section along Highway 24.
Parks in the community should continue to be enhanced and improved with
amenities such as playground equipment, seating/benches and picnic facilities. New
development along the proposed main street should include parks and recreational
space amenities for new commercial and residential development.
3.5.6 Historic Properties
There are no historic properties within the Cape Carteret planning area.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 95

3.5.7 Police & EMS Services
Cape Carteret's Police Department is located at 204 W.B. McLean Drive and
provides police protection for the community.
Fire Rescue and Emergency Medical Services are provided by the Western Carteret
Volunteer Fire and Rescue District. Western Carteret Fire & EMS Station 1 is located
outside of the Town in Cedar Point off Hwy. 24. Basic emergency medical treatment
and transportation to hospitals are provided by the fire and rescue squad.
3.5.8 Schools
All public schools in Carteret County are operated by the Carteret County School
System, including White Oak Elementary, which is located within Cape Carteret
town limits, on Highway 24.
The chart on the facing page shows the Average Daily Membership between 2009
and 2021 within the Carteret County School system
900
800
700
600
500
0
a 400
300
200
100
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
amGmDWHITE OAK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Figure 22: Enrollment in White Oak Middle School
2009-2021. Source: Carteret County Schools
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 97

•
P41
.=401
Atlantic Elementary School
120 114
108 98 90
87
76
77
82
75
79
78
Bogue Sound Elementary School
420
421
420
413 446
441
427
414
441
423
437
435
Beaufort Elementary School
465
457
416
422 423
452
440
474
429
442
416
376
Bridges School
0
0
0
0 32
43
32
29
31
24
27
11
Beaufort Middle School
258
270
284
290 278
268
249
269
274
275
287
265
Broad Creek Middle School
588
624
647
672 657
665
637
658
634
666
679
670
East Carteret High School
571
568
543
538 566
594
627
587
564
521
507
548
Croatan High School
855
872
868
894 902
904
926
907
895
846
842
875
Harkers Island Elementary School
155
140
132
125 111
88
124
97
109
103
98
100
Morehead City Elementary School
@ Camp Glenn
322
333
322
289 286
297
268
293
296
256
273
259
Morehead City Middle School
466
493
494
533 515
523
496
500
504
512
505
443
Morehead City Primary School
627
659
640
678 626
597
571
547
569
576
599
508
Newport Elementary School
767
821
766
783 757
729
749
737
723
705
681
686
Newport Middle School
471
474
497
490 496
463
432
414
400
407
400
377
Smyran Elementary School/
Down East Middle School
266
274
299
293 304
307
257
258
259
290
259
243
Amarine Science & Technology
Early College High School
49
97
95
West Carteret High School
1204
1193
1179
1214 1151
1210
1249
1251
1257
1129
1078
1073
WHITE OAK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
669
740
788
751 794
777
803
791
796
801
794
707
ADM numbers DO NOT include Pre-K

3.6 Land Use Suitability Analysis
3.6.1 Vacant Land by Zoning
The Town has 1,599 total parcels. Of the total parcels, 369 are undeveloped.
The majority of these parcels are zoned Low Density Single Family Residential.
The largest parcels that are undeveloped are generally zoned B-20 Retail Sales &
Shopping Center.
However, because parcels can be re -zoned or the Town's zoning classifications
themselves may be updated in time, this is not a forecast of what will ultimately
develop in undeveloped parcels. This information only applies to the vacant land by
zoning as of the adoption of this plan.
3.6.2 Acreage of Vacant Land
Out of the Town's 1599 parcels, 369 are undeveloped. Of those that are
undeveloped, 157 are less than 1 acre, while 306 parcels are greater than 1 acre.
The total acreage of undeveloped land is 463 acres.
As is explained in the following section 3.6.3, not all of the vacant land is
developable due to environmental constraints.
3.6.3 Vacant Land Suitable for Development Based on Environmental
Out of the Town's 1599 parcels, 369 are undeveloped. The total acreage of
undeveloped land free of environmental constraints, such as wetlands, and is
suitable for development totals 318.
There are 144 acres of land that are constrained due to environmental factors.
3.7 Analysis of Current Land Use Plan
Cape Carteret's 2007 CAMA plan is a thorough, detailed, environmental plan that
served the community well as a land use guide for 14 years. It adheres to the
requirements of the CAMA legislation and provides the information necessary to
evaluate CAMA permits. Many of the proposed elements are very similar between
that plan and this, highlighting the continuity of the community's desires for the
future. The 2007 plan shows additional connector streets between NC 58, NC 24
and Taylor Notion Road and an off -road hike/bike trail along Taylor Notion Road and
NC 24. This plan also proposes connecting streets in the same area, with some
changes in detail, and proposes that the hike/bike trail be completed. The future
land use is largely the same, with more details offered in this plan.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 99

.
l
•I
'
tit
♦�
■
t
I'
•
� �
4 1 + rts� t
•
� s � ♦
4 t
�r
.moo a
`�1 F
' b
i•
_a
\
�NY �
■ V
i
r
♦ _ � � mom• � ■ i
Lit
■
V.
` •
i ,♦ •� t s i\�a Nr r♦ t
r } r \ 0
i
100
Legend
•'�.��
■� ,• r ,�Po„
ELITown of Cape Carteret Boundary
' • +*� i
�♦
Undeveloped Land by Zoning
- .��
i4ir
Zoning Classification
R-10 Residential (Single Family
® R-10 M Residential (Multi -family)
/
i
- R-13 Residential (Single-family)
��• +'
R-20 Residential (Low Density Single-family)
0 R-30 Residential (Low Density Single-family)
■ / \� • tom.
` i
i I �'
B-10 Business 8 Professional Offices
. { ' • \
- B-20 Retail Sales & Shopping Center
• g , I • I 1 '�
- B-20 CU Conditional Use District
B-30 Light Industrial
Y
ETJ R-10 M (Extra Territorial Jurisdiction)
L --'7
® ETJ R-30 (Extra Territorial Jurisdiction)
•i

,t0 O
L
16111111111
M, Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
rw Parcel size >= or < than 1 acre
® ,.�VA i
Zoning Classification
n
Illli
1..nAi Qe.
� � � ��� .0 :`�� �� �� n� as d'. •. r
� � <JQ L• � �� PW On�Q i
O ,��Q oo® �•onA
��yU�;v� d • w va���i � v a �A mac", � � uo E r , . ,
00 ✓,�,� 4000� � � `
e®.off v �o �� • •� -e � o.
u -�o p 490• 4A� sc. J
�v .�sV 0� Aa!�l�Ai• d
,� V

3.7.1 Consistency of Existing Ordinances with the Current Land Use Plan
Policies
Cape Carteret's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) includes the Town's Zoning
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Sign
Ordinance and Waterways Ordinance. The UDO was created in 2021 and included
updates to bring the Town's ordinances into compliance with Chapter 160D of
General Statutes and enable Special Use Permits. The ordinances are generally
in compliance with the 2007 plan, but will need to undergo significant updates to
ensure that they are meeting the goals and intention of this plan.
3.7.2 Adoption of the Current Implementation Measures
Major implementation activities undertaken by Cape Carteret since the preparation
of the 2007 CAMA plan include:
• Building phases of the hike/bike trail
• Creation and adoption of a Unified Development Ordinance in 2021
• Adoption of many individual Zoning Ordinance Amendments
• Adoption of an updated Flood Damage Protection Ordinance in 2020
3.7.3 Effectiveness of the Current Policies
The existing land use policies and regulations will need to be updated to ensure that
the vision of this plan is met, including updating the Zoning Ordinance to create
a new medium -density mixed -use district, increasing landscaping and parking lot
standards to have more stringent stormwater standards, et cetera.
102
of pAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 103

4. LAND USE PLAN
MANAGEMENT
104
of pAPE C9
0 A
o m
r �
y�gTH cAac���P

m
I

4.1 Introduction
The following goals, objectives and implementing actions are the steps the
Town can take to reach the stated vision. The first five (Public Access, Land Use
Compatibility, Infrastructure Carrying Capacity, Natural Hazard Areas, and Water
Quality are all required specifically by the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
The last three, Transportation, Housing, and Public Facilities, are not required
by CAMA, but are important elements of comprehensive planning for the future.
Comprehensive plans are required by G.S. 160D-501 (a) in order for a locality to
enact zoning regulations.
The Future Land Use map is required by CAMA, suggested by G.S. 160D, and is an
important feature of any land use plan. It makes recommendations of what land
use is appropriate in which areas and corresponds to Future Land Use categories
which describe the desired character of future development. After the plan is
adopted, the Official Zoning Map and the text of the Zoning Ordinance should be
changed to reflect the Future Land Use Map; this is the primary tool for ensuring
that future development is consistent and aligned with planning goals.
106

4.2 Public Access
One of Cape Carteret's greatest assets is the relationship with Bogue Sound,
including nine tributaries. Access to this asset is an important part of life in Cape
Carteret and should be increased and properly maintained.
MANAGEMENT GOAL: Maximize public access to the beaches and the public trust
waters of the coastal region.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Policies that address access needs and opportunities,
with strategies to develop public access and provisions for all segments of the
community, including persons with disabilities.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Maintain existing parks and public access points to the Sound.
2. Invest in maintenance of the landscaping across the entire Town including
existing parks and water access.
3. Upgrade parks and public access where necessary to ensure that these
amenities are accessible for all people, including those with disabilities.
Action A. Equip Quailwood and Bahia Lane Parks and all areas throughout
the Town with quality amenities including trash receptacles, seating, play
equipment, or bathroom facilities.
Action B. Assess the quality of pedestrian and bicycle connections to the
town resident access waterfront by means besides automobiles.
Action C. Create a new park in the neighborhoods surrounding the golf
course.
Action D. Create new public open space in the new Town Center. Expand
opportunities to access the Croatan National Forest.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 107

4.3 Land Use Compatibility
MANAGEMENT GOAL: Ensure that development and use of resources or
preservation of land balance protection of natural resources and fragile areas with
economic development, avoids risks to public health, safety, and welfare.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Policies that characterize future land use development
patterns and establish mitigation criteria and concepts to minimize conflicts
between varying goals.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Amend the Official Zoning Map to align with the Future Land Use Map.
Action A. Amend the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to incorporate
these requirements into law, including but not limited to creating a new
medium density mixed -use zoning district crafted to fit the Medium -
Density Mixed -Use Future Land Use category.
2. Maintain existing density of the built environment in existing low-lying areas
prone to flooding and storm surge, as depicted on the SLOSH and Flood Hazard
Areas maps.
3. Direct new development to a dense new town center/main street area that is in
an area of relatively high elevation and not prone to flooding or storm surges.
4. Create a sense of place and town identity by creating a walkable, mixed -use
town center including public open space, Town offices, and a mix of residential,
public institutional and commercial uses.
5. Increase density and commercial options for residents while limiting
automobile -oriented "sprawl" development, such as but not limited to, suburban
strip malls, large parking lots, drive through restaurants, or other individual
retailers "surrounded" by parking.
6. Promote civic life and identity in the Town by ensuring there are quality public
spaces throughout the new development.
7. Ensure that the mixed -use center attracts "Third Places" such as bars or coffee
shops that can act as social hubs for the community.
8. Limit the development of highway -oriented and drive through businesses to
Hwy 24 and 58.
9. Increase parking lot landscaping standards to include vegetative barriers,
landscaping islands with enough room for mature trees. Require landscaping to
be maintained and replanted as needed.
10.Reduce existing impervious surfaces and prevent the creation of new
impervious surfaces where possible, including excessive parking. Encourage the
creation of pervious paving where possible.
"Ii
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

11.Maintain rigorous screening standards, ensuring that:
• There is a vegetated barrier between commercial uses and existing single-
family neighborhoods (not to be implemented or expected in new mixed -
use neighborhoods).
• Storage, including self -storage, boat sales and storage, is well -screened
and not visible from the street.
• Ensure that screening standards allow for pedestrian or bicycle
connections where necessary to facilitate easier access between
neighborhoods.
12.Encourage the preservation of mature trees and limit site disturbance with
development of various land uses.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 109

4.4 Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
MANAGEMENT GOAL: Ensure that public infrastructure systems are sized,
located, and managed so the quality and productivity of AECs and other fragile
areas are protected or restored.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Policies that establish service criteria and ensure
improvements minimize impacts to AECs and other fragile areas.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Invest in existing private wastewater treatment facility to prevent failure.
2. Seek grant funding for a regional wastewater treatment facility and allow for
the expansion of treatment capacity.
3. In new residential developments, require community private packing plants,
rather than new residential on septic.
4. Ensure that existing private residential septic systems in flood -prone areas are
prepared for storm events.
5. Implement and continue a public education campaign regarding septic system
best practices to teach residents tips to keep their septic fields from flooding,
such as aiming downspouts away from septic fields and mounding soil to keep
water from pooling.
6. Locate funding to provide funds for residents with limited resources to address
their septic issues.
7. Invest in more nature -based stormwater infrastructure (creation and
maintenance) on public and private property in order to make the Town more
resilient to increased storm events.
110
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

4.5 Natural Hazard Areas
MANAGEMENT GOAL: Conserve and maintain barrier dunes, beaches, floodplains
and other coastal features for their natural storm protection functions and their
natural resources giving recognition to public health, safety, and welfare issues.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Policies that establish mitigation and adaptation
concepts and criteria for development and redevelopment, including public facilities,
and that minimize threats to life, property, and natural resources resulting from
erosion, high winds, storm surge, flooding, or other natural hazards.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Require new development in flood prone areas to be designed to meet or
exceed floodplain mitigation standards.
2. Ensure that existing residential uses in low-lying areas have properly
functioning septic systems that are inspected and maintained or properly
abandoned.
3. Ensure that new development does not occur in wetlands or other
environmentally sensitive areas.
4. Implement Low -Impact Development policies for new development.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 111

4.6 Water Quality
MANAGEMENT GOAL: Maintain, protect, and where possible enhance water
quality in all coastal wetlands, rivers, streams, and estuaries.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Policies that establish strategies and practices to
prevent or control nonpoint source pollution and maintain or improve water quality.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Maintain all stormwater on -site. Every property will have the infrastructure to
ensure that each rain drop that falls on site can be absorbed into the ground on
site.
2. Encourage the use of nature -based stormwater mitigation practices such as
bioswales and rain gardens on both public and private property.
3. Prevent the creation of new infrastructure (public, private, residential, or
commercial) that moves stormwater off -site.
4. Continue to create and maintain a system of natural ditches on public right-of-
way that will collect and absorb runoff from streets and sidewalks.
5. Make clear who is responsible for mitigating runoff on each property. Maintain a
publicly accessible map of flooding issues, the source of each issue, and whose
responsibility each is.
6. Encourage natural bioswales and rain gardens on public and private property.
7. Explore the feasibility of Town -led large scale stormwater interventions that can
act as public space amenities for the community.
8. Review and amend the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance as needed.
112

�IJr 11 ( 1 I �✓ �� I I �I\I � /

4.7 Transportation
GOAL: Achieve a complete multi -modal transportation system that safely satisfies
users of all modes of transportation.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES: Create a connected, mixed -use town center that is
accessible from all areas of town via multiple modes of transportation. Increase
opportunities for walking and biking through safe and comfortable infrastructure.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Complete the multi -use trail by seeking grant funds or other outside resources
exclusive of the Town's general fund.
2. Create connectivity between Highway 58, Taylor Notion Road and WB McLean
Drive.
3. Implement a roundabout or other traffic calming/life saving device at the
intersection of Highway 58 and Taylor Notion Road.
4. Complete the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Highway 58
from Cedar Point.
5. Reduce curb cuts on 24 and 58 to encourage smooth traffic flow and reduce
danger to pedestrians and bicyclists.
6. Ensure centrally located and plentiful bicycle parking throughout the Town.
7. Connect trail system to neighboring localities.
8. Ensure that there are safe pedestrian crossings across Highway 24 so that
residents can access the Cape Carteret Trail as well as commercial areas and
community amenities.
9. Crosswalks should be highly visible and utilize all current best practices for
safety and design.
114

k
F ,
Y.
1.
c
ip�
Y
w ,y`

4.8 Housing
GOAL: Ensure that there are sufficient housing options for residents at all stages of
life and income levels.
PLANNING OBJECTIVE: Increase housing options including multi -family units
and options for seniors so that current residents can downsize and remain in Cape
carteret, or young people can remain in town.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Amend the Official Zoning Map to align with the Future Land Use Map.
2. Create a new mixed -use zoning district sufficient to accommodate the vision for
the mixed -use town center, including minimal setbacks and patio homes.
3. Increase the amount of multi -family condominiums and rental units available.
4. Ensure that new housing is integrated within the mixed -use area, rather than
being isolated and surrounded by parking.
5. Retain existing single-family zoning districts as they are applied as of the
writing of this plan.
6. Ensure that manufactured housing is permitted by -right in neighborhoods
where it currently exists.
7. Promote aging in place development
8. promote access to high speed internet and communication networks to allow for
telework and additional residential growth and teleworkers.
116
of pAPE C9
o m
r _1
2ORTH C AaO�`�P

4.9 Community Facilities
GOAL: Maintain consistent high -quality services and amenities for Town residents.
PLANNING OBJECTIVE: Ensure that as the Town's population grows, so does the
quality of services provided.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Support initiatives from adjoining municipalities to establish their own law
enforcement agencies while continuing to support mutual aid agreements with
established law enforcement agencies.
2. Move Town Hall and the Police Department to the new main street area, as
appropriate.
3. Ensure that public facilities embody the goals of the comprehensive plan,
providing generous public space amenities at their street -facing sides.
4. Equip parks with creative playscapes and seating elements, trash receptacles,
and other amenities.
Why move Town services IikE
Headquarters to the new Mai
staff will be able to maintain
in case of emergency caused
event.
Town Hall and Police
n Street area? So Town
services and assistance
by a severe weather
A look at the SLOSH maps on page 65 or in Appendix
E shows this is one of the only areas shows that
the future Town Center will be only be affected by a
Category 5 Hurricane.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 117

4.10 Economic Development
GOAL: Increase tax base and mix of uses in ways that enhance the quality of life
for existing residents and cause no harm to the natural environment.
PLANNING OBJECTIVE: Create a more self-sufficient and diverse local economy
while protecting the environment as a means of economic benefit.
Policies/Implementing Actions:
1. Capitalize on the Town's proximity to coastal waterways with investments that
build shared value for the Town, such as a waterfront park.
2. Attract a diverse mix of uses, including "third places" such as coffee shops,
restaurants, and bars, to the new main street development area.
3. Cluster new development so that it can benefit from close proximity and
increase the potential of walking and bicycling trips.
4. Highlight and promote local businesses, ensure that new development features
leasable space at a variety of square footages to accommodate new businesses
of varying sizes.
5. Explore "pop-up" retail or food options in Town, such as at waterfront parks.
6. Create and promote local events such as markets or concerts to build civic life
in Town.
7. Limit the following uses: adult entertainment, self -storage and other storage
uses, moving and truck rental services, boat storage, laundromats, car repairs,
salvage yards, dumpster storage yards, heavy equipment parking, heavy
industrial uses, dry cleaners, boat repairs, equipment repair, pawn shops,
tattoo/piercing parlors, homeless shelters, addiction rehab centers, metal
buildings, and gravel parking lots.
118
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 119

5. FUTURE LAND USE
AND CONCEPTUAL
IDEAS
120
°� °APE C9
2
-k A
° m
r -1
y0
qTH caa°���P

R i
Q .
1"
r 4
'.�,- s !� �� i.'1�! _,t � fir ti!) i �"'M• i Ir. � F u��i i ;y,,.�.«.•-.r'�R`"
3 rf'106 h�J�.fE��ayt1�Cd i1 �.�.�d ,.. ,/�.w •�i fi (y. � I'� I �.1����.���L�6.�A.A,

5.1 Future Land Use Categories
The Future Land Use categories listed below provide guidance for desired land use
development in legislative considerations such as a rezoning or special use permit.
The categories define suitable development patterns for all portions of the Town's
corporate limits and are as follows:
• Single -Family Residential - These areas are intended to remain as single-
family residential structures (to include stick -built, modular, manufactured,
and other types as permitted by building code). Many neighborhoods in this
category are already existing. By maintaining the lower density residential
areas south of Highway 24, there is less risk of flood damage. Additionally,
residential areas in the northeast around the golf course preserve natural
foliage.
• Medium Density Mixed -Use - This category will accommodate varying
land uses including including various types of residential uses, patio homes,
retirement communities and hotels. It is located primarily between Taylor
Notion Rd. and Highway 24 to allow for the development of a new pedestrian
and bicyclist friendly "main street" away from the highway on higher ground,
allowing for diverse housing choices, goods, and services for the community
and to promote civic life in the Town.
• Commercial - This category is located along Highway 24 and is reserved for
active commercial uses in the Town, including restaurants, retail, offices, or
other stores accessed mainly by automobile, with connectivity for pedestrians
or bicyclists as well.
• Institutional - This land use category preserves the "institutional" uses of
the library, schools, and churches as places where community services are
administered and the public can gather. Structures should be well connected by
walking and bicycling as well as utilize their grounds for amenities to serve the
community.
• Public Open Space - This category includes Cape Carteret's parks, boat
launches, and Hunting Island. Cape Carteret's public open space allows for
recreational amenities as well as public access to the water.
• Utilities - This category includes the electric substation off of Taylor Notion
Rd. and other utility uses by parcel in the Town. These are expected to be
preserved.
• Vacant Marshland - This category encompasses the marshland within Cape
Carteret's planning jurisdiction. This land is protected and should never be
developed on. The marshland provides environmental benefits to the Town and
local waterbodies.
122
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

RE�RDRD RPRK G\RGtE g / •`� , /` ,
o
3 v� F9ay((OR/�F e�PU6USS NEORJE o0 � •_--�, `m,�C m 2
HIDDEN BPYD�E.� O F O COP ,
HICKORY HILLS ROAD � -000 C1RO�E `
• GOGUEN ROAD
°Gp J E /
/ J hP
�p Legend
cmy ems y° ; �� Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
Ile• �% eg Pao"` /
Draft -Future Land Use Classifications
HUNTE�ROWN DRIVE F GEM/ry L 5
0 of•• I Single -Family Residential
�'X,ROAD PR PNDPKs°P ` g Medium Density Mixed -Use
•. _ commercial
- Institutional
•.� �� - Public/Semi-Public Open Space
• Utilities
I Vacant Marshland -Not to be developed
I
/ 9
,� W6�O�PHOaNE OUAK Rury ' ZF YORiVF
"� ■ rymFO
. 3 rc w � ■ °<F
BAYS\DEORNE • O 6 w s
w � PARHAVENUE /
g OGHPNNE° �y � , OOURT IBAYVIEW COURT
1 / OJp EDGEWgTER COURT a ¢ /
DEERGREEK LOURS �rc
/ DRIVE ,
Q `DMPLINDP
° w
DEER GREEF
/
/ � 2 ■
` KEAROFNE m /
/ BOUNOV\EW ORNE 1
/ • 1
NN
0 1]535U ]00
®Feet
MAY 2021
m SUMMIT
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 123

The most important concept is to protect the Town from increased weather events
and to limit development impacts on the natural environment. The most prevalent
issue from weather events is flooding due to inadequate stormwater infrastructure.
The most prevalent threats to the natural environment are: development in
inappropriate areas; septic/wastewater failings/overflow; and non -point source
pollution from runoff including fertilizer and pesticides and automobile effluent.
Cape Carteret's attractive location by the water also makes it vulnerable to flooding
and damage from storm events. By providing for innovative stormwater methods
both on -site with development and through specified municipal projects, the
community can begin to build its resilience by working with the environment.
Examples of innovative stormwater methods include bioswales, rain gardens, green
roofs, landscaping islands, and other designs that help trap and slow water, making
the community a "sponge" rather than trying to keep water out by hard concrete
engineering which can speed up the flow of water. Other methods include simply
leaving existing mature vegetation or protecting wetland areas from encroachment.
By investing in the Town's protection and requiring it with new development, the
Town can ensure its protection for the future which will have increased storm events
of greater intensity.
For more information about
environmental stormwater
techniques the Town should
implement, please see Appendix D:
Green Stormwater Infrastructure.
What policies will enact this big
idea?
• Stormwater-focused
development standards
• Stormwater projects at public
facilities
Emulating natural solutions
for environmental stormwater
protection is more sustainable
economically in the long
run, and healthier for water
quality.
• Communication and education with the public
• Public, private, residential and commercial partners doing their parts
124
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -H C AaO�`�P

i B � � yLi �, f y, 'V•st�J ' '�`t _ k W �� � y zc � '4
bF yl �r

Cape Carteret's geographic position makes it an attractive place to live, but also
puts it at danger of storm events. New development needs to be directed into a
more dense and walkable pattern, particularly north of Highway 24 to mitigate
potential hazards. Wastewater utility capacity can limit where new growth can be
accommodated and provide for its service more efficiently.
However, directing density does not mean the Town will lose its charm or character.
Currently it is difficult to gather or move through Cape Carteret through means
besides the automobile through a disjointed network of paths and trails. By moving
the "main street" away from the highway and into a calmer area, there is a new
possibility to create vibrant civic life in the Town as well as provide new services,
restaurants, and retail with housing options for new residents.
Without "directing" the density, low -density sprawl will cause traffic congestion,
harm the environment, diminish aesthetics and sense of place, and make the
community more difficult to walk or bicycle through. The Town has the opportunity,
through its comprehensive plan, to lead, guide, and shape new development.
126
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

'FK'ROAO
,pIP�NE �NOSV �
SPNSpN� 90J� i..
Q
Legend
� Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
Density Type
Future Medium Density
Low Density
a
4 \ ♦ � s
•i rt Z /
• � � 4 ♦r y I
Z•
I
I
i
p
AN
0 175350 700 1050 1400
® Feet
MAY 2021
L mSUMMIT
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 127

This big idea is to give Cape Carteret a new, walkable town center, or Main Street
area, that will be the heart of Town as well as a regional draw. The area will feature
public open space and a mix of uses including housing, retail, offices, and Town
services. With a cohesive aesthetic and high quality design, the Main Street area
will be a center that all Cape Carteret residents can be proud of.
Currently, there is no road that makes a connection between NC 58, NC 24, and
Taylor Notion Road. Golfin Dolphin and Enterprise both enter this commercial area
from NC 24 but offer no connection to other areas of town. Of the approximately
300 acres in this triangle -shaped area, over 100 acres are undeveloped and could
contribute to the creation of a town center.
The connection between Enterprise Drive and Golfin' Dolphin Drive should be part of
the first phase of this project.
128

While Cape Carteret has many assets that make it a great place to live, residents
have repeated that they would like to have a stronger town identity including a
"center of Town." For vibrant civic life it is important to create a space away from
NC 24 where land uses are auto -centric and the speed of cars makes an unsafe and
uncomfortable place for pedestrians.
The new development should be a model for innovative stormwater solutions,
feature attractive landscaping and shade trees. The new town center should
emphasize pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity to the community. The
proximity of different uses next to each other will encourage greater activity.
The new town center will provide an economic, environmental, and social
opportunity for the community to be more resilient to future challenges, and allow
Cape Carteret to emerge as a regional node and distinct community of its own.
Long-range Conceptual Plan
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 129

The design criteria for this area should include "human scale" details, such as
signage and storefronts, pedestrian friendly streets through wide sidewalks and
differentiated pavement, and people should have the priority right-of-way over cars
in the area.
Small and local businesses should be prioritized through leasable storefronts that
have an affordable square footage size, "third place" businesses such as cafes,
bars, or restaurants should be attracted to serve the community as a place to spend
time outside of home or work, and there should be public open spaces where the
community can sit or gather without necessarily purchasing anything.
There should be landscaping that offers shade from the sun and green areas that
are attractive. Good design can vary aesthetically, but generally shares the same
people -friendly principles.
Another key piece of ensuring this Town Center will develop is to consider that this
is a large land area. If an area is to be successful from a walkability and economic
standpoint, then it should be phased in clusters with each phase taking into account
the needed elements listed above.
Town services should be moved to the Main Street area, especially considering that
this is one of the areas of highest elevation in town and in case of storm surges, it
is important that Town staff is available to continue working and providing services
to Town residents. Please refer to SLOSH maps on page 63 and in Appendix E.
A�
1111
71
Photo courtesy of the Congress for a New Urbanism
130

What strategies will make the Town Center happen?
1. Create and apply new mixed -use zoning districts that have
appropriate form -based elements and design guidelines.
2. Increase the wastewater system capacity.
3. Identify funding mechanisms to install infrastructure including
roads, stormwater and wastewater.
4. Provide anchor uses and coordinate with property owners to
attract business growth and development.
5. Work with citizens, local landowners, and developers, to plan
and develop the project.
in
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 131

AND PEDESTRIAN
CONNErTIVITY
Completing the multi -use trail is a key piece of connecting the Cape Carteret
community by alternate means of transportation besides automobiles. The trail
currently extends partially on the south side of Taylor Notion Rd. and turns
around the corner to follow Highway 24 as a paved 9' wide asphalt surface, until
becoming a mulch trail before picking up partially by the elementary school as a
concrete path, and then continuing as an asphalt path into the northeast quadrant
of Highway 58 and 24. There are two gaps in the network at the Starbucks and
Marine Bank properties. A 12' asphalt path continues from the rear of the Starbucks
property north along Highway 58 until the end of the Mac Daddy's property.
The plan is for this path to continue down Highway 58, and connect to Taylor Notion
Rd., then continue until connecting where it stops on Taylor Notion Rd. creating a
continuous triangular path.
Once this trail is in place, much of the Cape Carteret planning area will be have
a multi -use path to navigate between residential and commercial areas of the
community for recreation and transportation. The Town has expressed the intention
to seek outside funding to help complete the trail.
132

Legend
Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
yr
Existing Multi -use Path
Al- Proposed Multi -Use Path
VO,
lip
0
'T
%
%
.........
♦
♦
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22
A
0 100200 400 600 800
6J-F I Feet
DECEMBER 2021
Wqtiffff
133

6. GOALS AND
IMPLEMENTATION
(Or Tools for Managing Development)
134
of pAPE C9
o m
r �
y0
gTH cARc���P

A ' F ,� ►�
s
,tom � � -��.:. �'� �� n � �✓ �
f � r
A�
Nor
r,
ok
x *I y
�
fw".1. ��.i'i kr� p' f:n.,,J <-rf.,'y� .t A•� {'V t�. fi-. -y,Y,
- '�. .r� ,I'' '+$r�,r�¢�; w. yi7•�.. � -e,"4k'� 3 .- �� yJy�, .IL- ..-
mot" ' r. '�.• .. 3}," A�•i' i -

6.1 Introduction
This section of the Comprehensive Plan is organized in accordance with the
requirements of Subchapter 7B .702(e) and outlines a description of tools that
the Town of Cape Carteret can use for land management as well as actions and
strategies that will be used to implement the plan.
6.2 Guide for Land Use Decision Making
This Comprehensive Plan, as adopted by the Town of Cape Carteret and as
amended from time to time, serves as the primary guide that land use policy
decisions are made. Every decision will be measured for consistency with the
goals, policies, and recommendations of this plan. The Board of Commissioners,
Planning Board, Board of Zoning Adjustment, and Town Staff should utilize the plan
as the basic policy guide in the administration of the zoning ordinance, subdivision
regulations, Special Use Permits, and other land development regulatory tools.
Persons involved in the land development industry as well as the general public
should use this plan to gain insight into the Town's expectations and policies around
land development. The Future Land Use map should be used as a tool for permitting
or denying future development and a guide for rezonings to be consistent with the
adopted plan.
The plan also assists in decisions regarding the provision of municipal services,
thoroughfare planning, stormwater planning and management, implementation of
economic development strategies, recreational facility planning, and preparation of
capital and operating budgets.
However, the plan acts as a guide and a tool in decision making. The final decision
rests with the elected officials.
6.3 Continuing Planning Projects
The plan should be continuously referenced to ensure its full implementation, but
also respond to any shifts or changing conditions that require consideration in
the plan. Updates and modifications to the Comprehensive Plan can be made as
needed. Particularly, the residents of Cape Carteret should be surveyed from time
to time to give their input and feedback regarding services and development in
the Town to maintain constant engagement. Engagement can build higher levels of
trust and transparency in the community and make the decision making process
more open.
136
of pAPE C9
2 9�
o m
r _1
2OR -N C AaO�`�P

This section is organized in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter 7B
.0702(e) of the Coastal Area Management Act, and outlines the steps the Town will
take to implement the plan.
Guide for Land Use Decision -Making:
CAMA Language: "The plan shall describe the role of the plan policies, including the
future land use map, in local decisions regarding land use and development. "
The Comprehensive and CAMA Land Use Plan, as adopted by the Town of Cape
Carteret, will serve as the primary guide for land use policy decisions. Every land
use policy decision, such as a rezoning request or a Special Use Permit application,
will be measured against the vision, goals, objectives and implementing actions
outlined in this plan, and should not be approved if found to be inconsistent. The
Board of Commissioners, Planning Board, Board of Zoning Adjustment, Town staff
and other stakeholders should refer to this plan as a basic policy guide for all land
use decisions. Persons involved in the land development business as well as the
general public can also use the Plan to guide private decisions regarding land use
and development. The Future Land Use map should be used as a tool for permitting
or denying future development and a guide for rezonings to be consistent with the
adopted plan.
The policy statements and recommendations of the Comprehensive and CAMA
Land Use Plan can also be of assistance to the elected officials in making long-
range decisions regarding such matters as the provision of municipal services,
thoroughfare planning, stormwater planning and management, implementation of
economic development strategies, recreational facility planning, and preparation of
capital and operating budgets.
Upon adoption, this Plan will supersede the previous (2007) CAMA Plan. The
Comprehensive and CAMA Land Use Plan is a decision -making guide and not a
legally -binding document.
Development Management Program:
CAMA Language: "The plan shall describe the community's development
management program, including local ordinances, codes, other plans and policies. "
The Town has local policies and ordinances in place which guide development, and
which should be amended to ensure that they are in line with the vision of this Plan.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 137

The primary development regulation for Cape Carteret is the Town's Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), adopted in 2021. This UDO combines all
development regulations into one cohesive document, including:
• Zoning Ordinance
• Subdivision Ordinance
• Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
• Sign Ordinance
• Waterways Ordinance
The Town's land development management program is administered by the Town
Manager acting as UDO Administrator and other staff as delegated by the Town
Manager (see Chapter 6: Administrative Decisions). The Town's land development
regulations are applicable to all land areas within the Cape Carteret planning and
zoning jurisdiction.
The Town Manager and the Town Clerk serve as staff support for the Cape Carteret
Board of Commissioners, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment. The
Planning Board serves primarily in an advisory capacity, making recommendations
to the to the Town Board of Commissioners on zoning and subdivision matters,
as well as Special Use Permit applications. The UDO requires that the Planning
Board make a statement to the Board of Commissioners regarding each Special
Use Permit application's consistency with the adopted Comprehensive and CAMA
Land Use Plan. The Zoning Board of Adjustment is responsible for hearing appeals
of decisions of the UDO Administrator, zoning map and lot line interpretations, and
variances.
The detailed powers and duties of staff, the Board of Commissioners, the Planning
Board, the Zoning Board of Adjustments, and Town staff in the execution of land
development regulations are outlined in Chapter 7 of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
Action Plan and Implementation Schedule:
CAMA Language: "The plan shall describe the actions that will be taken by the local
government to implement policies that meet the CRC's management topic goals
and objectives. It shall specify the fiscal year(s) in which each action is anticipated
to start and finish. It shall describe the specific steps the local government plans
to take to implement the policies, including the adoption and amendment of local
ordinances, other plans, and special projects. The action plan shall be used to
prepare the implementation and status report for the plan. "
The Town has developed the following acti
Land Use Plan. This section of the plan is
land use planning requirements in Section
Dn plan and schedule to implement the
intended to comply specifically with CAMA
15A NCAC 07B.0702. For the full set of
plan recommendations, please see page 104.
138

Date ofImplementation:
CAMA Goal:
Cape Carteret Strategy:
Public Water Access Implementation Actions:
Maintain existing parks and public access points to the Sound.
Ongoing
Upgrade parks and public access where necessary to ensure that these amenities are accessible for all people,
including those with disabilities.
Ongoing
Invest in maintenance of the landscaping across the entire Town including existing parks and water access.
Ongoing
Equip Quailwood and Bahia Lane Parks and all areas throughout the Town with quality amenities including
trash receptacles, seating, play equipment, or bathroom facilities.
Assess the quality of pedestrian and bicycle connections to the town resident access waterfront by means
besides automobiles.
Ongoing
Explore the implementation of a "sound walk" along the waterfront or other wooden sculptural or seating
platform.
TBD
Create a new park in the neighborhoods surrounding the golf course.
TBD
Create new public open space in the new Town Center.
FY22 and beyond
Expand opportunities to access the Croatan National Forest.
TBD
Date ofImplementation:
CAMA Goal:
Cape Carteret Strategy:
Land Use Compatibility Implementation Actions:
Amend the Official Zoning Map to align with the Future Land Use Map.
FY 22
Amend the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to incorporate these requirements into law, including but
not limited to creating a new medium density mixed -use zoning district crafted to fit the Medium -Density
Mixed -Use Future Land Use category.
FY 22
Maintain existing density of the built environment in existing low-lying areas prone to flooding and storm
surge, as depicted on the SLOSH and Flood Hazard Areas maps.
Ongoing
Direct new development to a dense new town center/main street area that is in an area of relatively high
elevation and not prone to flooding or storm surges.
Ongoing
Create a sense of place and town identity by creating a walkable, mixed -use town center including public open
space, Town offices, and a mix of residential, public institutional and commercial uses.
FY22 and beyond
Increase density and commercial options for residents while limiting automobile -oriented "sprawl'
development, such as but not limited to, suburban strip malls, large parking lots, drive through restaurants, or
other individual retailers "surrounded" by parking.
Ongoing
Promote civic life and identity in the Town by ensuring there are quality public spaces throughout the new
development.
Ongoing
Ensure that the mixed -use center attracts "Third Places" such as bars or coffee shops that can act as social
hubs for the community.
FY22 and beyond
Limit the development of highway -oriented and drive through businesses to Hwy 24 and 58.
FY22 and beyond
Increase parking lot landscaping standards to include vegetative barriers, landscaping islands with enough
room for mature trees. Require landscaping to be maintained and replanted as needed.
FY 22
Reduce existing impervious surfaces and prevent the creation of new impervious surfaces where possible,
including excessive parking. Encourage the creation of pervious paving where possible.
Ongoing
Maintain rigorous screening standards, ensuring that: There is a vegetated barrier between commercial uses
and existing single-family neighborhoods (not to be implemented or expected in new mixed -use
neighborhoods). Storage, including self -storage, boat sales and storage, is well -screened and not visible from
the street. Ensure that screening standards allow for pedestrian or bicycle connections where necessary to
facilitate easier access between neighborhoods
FY 22 and beyond
Encourage the preservation of mature trees and limit site disturbance with development of various land uses.
Ongoing
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 139

Date of
CAMA Goal:
Cape Carteret Strategy:
Implementation:
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity Implementation Actions:
Invest in existing private wastewater treatment facility to prevent failure.
TBD
Seek grant funding for a regional wastewater treatment facility and allow for the expansion of treatment
capacity.
TBD
In new residential developments, require community private packing plants, rather than new residential on
septic.
As projects arise
Ensure that existing private residential septic systems in flood -prone areas are prepared for storm events.
As projects arise
Implement public education campaign regarding septic best practices to teach residents tips to keep their
septic fields from flooding, such as aiming downspouts away from septic fields and mounding soil to keep
water from pooling.
FY22 and beyond
Locate funding to provide funds for residents with limited resources to address their septic issues.
TBD
Invest in more nature -based stormwater infrastructure (creation and maintenance) on public and private
property in order to make the Town more resilient to increased storm events.
FY22 and beyond
Date of
CAMA Goal:
Cape Carteret Strategy:
Implementation:
Natural Hazard Areas Implementation Actions:
Require new development in flood prone areas to be designed to meet or exceed floodplain mitigation
standards.
FY22 and beyond
Ensure that existing residential uses in low-lying areas have properly functioning septic systems that are
inspected and maintained or properly abandoned.
FY22 and beyond
Ensure that new development does not occur in wetlands.
Ongoing
Implement Low -Impact Development policies for new development.
FY22 and beyond
Date of
CAMA Goal:
Cape Carteret Strategy:
Implementation:
Water Quality Implementation Actions:
Maintain all stormwater on -site. Every property will have the infrastructure to ensure that each rain drop that
falls on site can be absorbed into the ground on site.
FY22 and beyond
Encourage the use of nature -based stormwater mitigation practices such as bioswales and rain gardens on
both public and private property.
FY22 and beyond
Prevent the creation of new infrastructure (public, private, residential, or commercial) that moves stormwater
off -site.
FY22 and beyond
Continue to create and maintain a system of natural ditches on public right-of-way that will collect and absorb
runofffrom streets and sidewalks.
Ongoing
Make clear who is responsible for mitigating runoff on each property. Maintain a publicly accessible map of
flooding issues, the source of each issue, and whose responsibility each is.
FY22 and beyond
Encourage natural bioswales and rain gardens on public and private property.
FY22 and beyond
Explore the feasibility of Town -led large scale stormwater interventions that can act as public space amenities
for the community.
TBD
Review and amend the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance as needed.
Ongoing
140
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2ORTH C AaO�`�P

CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 141

APPENDIX A.0
MATRIX OF REQUIRED
ELEMENTS
142
2 CAPE Cq9
F
o m
r �
2CRTH C AaC�`�P

Matrix for Land Use Plan Elements —15A NCAC 7B .0702
Page Reference(s)
Organization of the Plan
• Matrix that shows the location of the required elements as set forth in this
Rule
Appendix A
Community Concerns and Aspirations
• Description of the dominant growth -related conditions that influence land use,
development, water quality and other environmental concerns in the planning
area
26
Description of the land use and development topics most important to the future of the
planning area, including:
• Public Access
26
• Land Use Compatibility
26
• Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
26
• Natural Hazard Areas
26
• Water Quality
26
Community Vision
• Description of the general physical appearance and form that represents the
local government's plan for the future. It shall include objectives to be
achieved by the plan and identify changes that may be needed to achieve the
planning vision.
33
Existing and Emerging Conditions
Population, Housing and Economy
Discussion of the following data and trends:
• Permanent population growth trends using data from the two most decennial
Censuses
38
• Current permanent and seasonal population estimates
38,39
• Key population characteristics including age and income
35,47
• Thirty-year projections of permanent and seasonal population in five-year
increments
42
• Estimate of current housing stock, including permanent and seasonal units,
tenure, and types of units (single-family, multifamily, and manufactured)
43,44
• Description of employment by major sectors and community economic activity
45, 46, 47
Natural Systems
Description of natural features in the planning jurisdiction to include:
• Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) as set forth in Subchapter 15A NCAC
07H
50,52
• Soil characteristics, including limitations for septic tanks, erodibility, and other
factors related to development
52, 53, 54
• Environmental Management Commission (EMC) water quality classifications
and related use support designations
55,56
• Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) shellfish growing areas and water quality
conditions
57 (72, 73)
• Flood and other natural hazard areas
58, 59, 60, 61
• Storm surge areas
62,63
• Non -coastal wetlands, including forested wetlands, shrub -scrub wetlands and
freshwater marshes
51, 64
• Water supply watersheds or wellhead protection areas
64
• Primary nursery areas
64
• Environmentally fragile areas, such as wetlands, natural heritage areas, areas
containing endangered species, prime wildlife habitats, or maritime forests
66, 67, 68, 69
143

Natural Systems, contd.
Page Reference(s)
• Additional natural features or conditions identified by the local government
68
Environmental Conditions
Discussion of environmental conditions within the planning jurisdiction to include an
assessment of the following conditions and features:
• Status and changes of surface water quality; including:
Impaired streams from the most recent Division of Water Resources
(DWR) Basin Planning Branch Reports
70,71
Clean Water Act 303 (d) List
71,72
Other comparable data
-
• Current situation and trends on permanent and temporary closures of
shellfishing waters as determined by the Report of Sanitary Survey by the
Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality Section of the DMF
72,73
• Areas experiencing chronic wastewater treatment malfunctions
73,74
• Areas with water quality or public health problems related to non -point source
pollution
73,74
• Areas subject to recurrent flooding, storm surges and high winds
74
• Areas experiencing significant shoreline erosion as evidenced by the presence
of threatened structures or public facilities
74
• Environmentally fragile areas (as defined in Part (c)(2)(A)(ix) of this Rule) or
areas where resources functions are impacted as a result of development
75
• Natural resource areas that are being impacted or lost as a result of
incompatible development. These may include, but are not limited to the
following: coastal wetlands, protected open space, and agricultural land.
75
Existing Land Use and Development
MAP of existing land use patterns
77
• Description of the existing land use patterns
76, 79, 80, 81
• Estimates of the land area allocated to each land use category
79, 80, 81
• Characteristics of each land use category
79, 80, 81
MAP of historic, cultural, and scenic areas designated by a state or federal agency or by
the local government
N/A (See 81)
• Descriptions of the historic, cultural and scenic areas
81
Community Facilities
Evaluation of existing and planned capacity, location and adequacy of community
facilities to include:
MAP of existing and planned public and private water supply service areas
84
• Description of existing public and private water supply systems to include:
Existing condition
83
Existing capacity
83
Documented overflows, bypasses or other problems that may degrade
water quality or constitute a threat to public health as documented by
the DWR
83
Future water supply needs based on population projections
83
MAP of existing and planned public and private wastewater service areas
86
• Description of existing public and private wastewater systems to include:
Existing condition
85
Existing capacity
85
Documented overflows, bypasses or other problems that may degrade
water quality or constitute a threat to public health as documented by
the DWR
85
Future wastewater system needs based on population projections
85
MAP of existing and planned multimodal transportation systems and port and airport
facilities
92, 132, 133
• Description of any highway segments deemed by the NC Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) as having unacceptable service as documented in the
most recent NCDOT Transportation and/or Thoroughfare Plan
91, 93, 94
144

Community Facilities, contd.
Page Reference(s)
• Description of highway facilities on the current thoroughfare plan or current
89, 91, 93, 94
transportation improvement plan
• Description of the impact of existing transportation facilities on land use
93
patterns
• Description of the existing public stormwater management system
87,88
• Identification of existing drainage problems and water quality issues related to
87, 88 (Point -source N/A)
point -source discharges of stormwater runoff
Policy
Page
Citation(s)
Reference(s)
Future Land Use
Policies
• Policies that exceed the use standards and permitting requirements found in
N/A
N/A
Subchapter 7H, State Guidelines for Areas of Environmental Concern
Policies that address the Coastal Resources Commission's (CRC's) management topics:
Public Access Management Goal:
Maximize public access to the beaches and the public trust waters of the coastal region.
The planning objectives for public access are local government plan policies that:
• Address access needs and opportunities
1
107
• Identify strategies to develop public access
2
107
• Address provisions for all segments of the community, including persons with
3 (Actions A-D)
107
disabilities
• For oceanfront communities, establish access policies for beach areas targeted
N/A
N/A
for nourishment
Land Use Compatibility Management Goal:
Ensure that development and use of resources or preservation of land balance protection
of natural resources and fragile areas with economic development, and avoids risks to
public health, safety, and welfare.
The planning objectives for land use compatibility are local government plan policies
that:
1, Action A, 2,
108
• Characterize future land use and development patterns
3
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
108,109
• Establish mitigation criteria and concepts to minimize conflicts
10, 11, 12
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity Management Goal:
Ensure that public infrastructure systems are sized, located, and managed so the quality
and productivity of AECs and other fragile areas are protected or restored.
The planning objectives for infrastructure carrying capacity are local government plan
policies that:
• Establish service criteria
1, 2, 3
110
• Ensure improvements minimize impacts to AECs and other fragile areas
4, 5, 6, 7
110
Natural Hazard Areas Management Goal:
Conserve and maintain barrier dunes, beaches, floodplains, and other coastal features for
their natural storm protection functions and their natural resources giving recognition to
public health, safety, and welfare issues.
The planning objectives for natural hazard areas are local government plan policies that:
• Establish mitigation and adaptation concepts and criteria for development and
1, 2, 3, 4
111
redevelopment, including public facilities
• Minimize threats to life, property and natural resources resulting from erosion,
1, 2, 3, 4
111
high winds, storm surge, flooding, or other natural hazards
Water Quality Management Goal:
Maintain, protect and where possible enhance water quality in all coastal wetlands,
rivers, streams, and estuaries.
The planning objectives for water quality are local government plan policies that:
145
2 � pAPE Cq9
F
o m
r _1
20
RTHC&Vko P

• Establish strategies and practices to prevent or control nonpoint source
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
112
pollution
7,8
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
112
• Establish strategies and practices to maintain or improve water quality
7,8
Future Land Use Map
Page Reference(s)
MAP of future land uses that depicts the policies for growth and development and the
123
desired future patterns of land use and development with consideration given to natural
system constraints and infrastructure
• Descriptions of land uses and development associated with the future land use
122
map designations
Tools for Managing Development
• Description of the role of plan policies, including the future land use map, in
136,137
local decisions regarding land use and development
• Description of the community's development management program, including
136, 137, 138
local ordinances, codes, and other plans and policies
Action Plan and Implementation Schedule
• Description of actions that will be taken by the local government to implement
138, 139, 140
policies that meet the CRC's management topic goals and objectives, specifying
fiscal year(s) in which each action is anticipated to start and finish
• Identification of specific steps the local government plans to take to implement
138, 139, 140
the policies, including adoption and amendment of local ordinances, other
plans, and special projects
146

147

APPENDIX B.0
VISION STATEMENTS
of CAPE C9
o m
r �
2ORTH C AaC�`�P

I would like Cape Carteret to have more tax revenue producing businesses. I would like the area by Realo to be
developed. It would be good for us to have a large professional building with offices of various different businesses
helpful to the residents. I would like there to be a sewer system for the business area. I would like the towns
around that do not have police forces to pay for our police services.
Exchange in kind makes no sense when they do not have a police force to exchange. It would be nice if we had an
Aldi's grocery store. A large department store. Lowe's Home improvement has been a big success and it was not
welcomed by all citizen. I would like the businesses to remain in the business area and not intrude into the
residential area. I have no children, but I see children playing in the streets with their skate boards, scooters etc.
It would be good to have a convenient area for them to do their sports so they are not in danger playing in the
street.
Controlled development with small town feel. Limit big box stores.
Preservation of natural areas and waterway, including limiting run off into sound and creeks.
Preserve natural protection of waterways.
My vision is that we maintain our small town coastal charm with safe, healthy, and clean environment. Find a way
to promote small local businesses while avoiding box stores that will change the character of our town.
Strive to provide educational, cultural, and recreational experiences for locals while making memorable moments
for visitors vacation here for present and future generations.
I would like to see the bike/walking trail completed. There are numerous sections done but they do not connect.
In addition, I would like to see a road from Taylor/Notion to Lowes's Food Store opened up. This would help our
elderly community get to the food and drug store. They would not have to drive on Hwy 24. In addition, I would
like to see several parks near the water for the citizens of the town to utilize. We should capitalize more on our
location (waterfront) . Just my opinion, I hate to see another gas station. We already have two in the town. If
they go out of business, this lot sits empty for decades. Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion.
A village atmosphere with ordinances that lead to common themes of design and color, for example: sign and
building ordinances calling for common design features especially in the commercial sector, size and color that
give a sense of continuity (in other words , avoid the Western Blvd helter-skelter atmosphere.)
Preservation of trees as much as is safe. Shore line protection.
Howdy! I would be happy to complete the citizen survey, but could not locate it. (Maybe I have already completed it?)
Perhaps you could add a direct link to it on this form - where you ask if they have completed it :) Feel free to email me the
link ; ) My Vision for Cape Carteret: A bit of a step -back in 'feel', of say 40-50+ years ago, where people not only reside, but
can go outside of their home to walk, bike, hike, explore, and reach shopping areas -- without having to drive. A few places
to meetup as well, a hang-out space to relax indoors and outdoors. For outdoors, Pavilions to have cookouts and gatherings,
play frisbee, etc (like the Hubert By -Pass Park)... and at least a couple of businesses that cater to not only tourists wanting a
quick coffee, but to the locals (uh, like Java Post, lol) who want to meetup. I'd love to see an indoor space with a relaxed
atmosphere, whereas Starbucks (typically) has the 'get in -buy -get out' feel, with unnaturally small tables and a very loud
atmosphere. Hopefully, the new Starbucks will have shade and outdoor tables for those who want to meetup/stay
longer/bring pets, and enough space to sit indoors/outdoors) for those who just walked/biked in and want to 'sit a spell'.
Bike lockups would be very helpful in the shopping areas to safely use our bikes. It would be quite helpful if a business
(restaurant/lounge/cafe?) would also have meeting/ conference space that the locals could use year-round for business or
personal gatherings -scheduled, of course. They could order drinks/meals if they want, but wouldn't have to (no quota -
maybe a small fee to rent out for locals, but not exorbitant). To have the kind of gatherings I need for my business, I
usually have to rent out a hotel conference room or restaurant back room (rare to find, now) in Jacksonville or elsewhere. I
do realize that the community building at the library is available, but it cannot be used for income/business gatherings.
Would also love a sit-down restaurant (could be the same one as the lounge/cafe, or a separate one) where it's easy to grab
something quickly, or stay awhile. Panera has that type of feel. Main concept of my vision for Cape Carteret: Connection -
naturally, with each other, basic needs (groceries, etc), easy meetup spaces, and easy connection with the outdoors
(especially the water!). About the water, I have found a lack in the entire coastal area for places to simply park (or walk/ride
a bike) to simply enjoy sitting at the water - with some shade available. (Ward's Shore Park in Swansboro is a good example
of the concept). There is so much water, and that is a huge reason I moved here, but unless you live AT it, I have found it
challenging to be able to simply enjoy it (without a watercraft)... I envision a community where being connected to these
things is not only possible-- but safe and inviting, so we are naturally encouraged to be out and about and meeting up with
our family, friends, and clients - within Cape Carteret itself. Imagine the high quality of life here! : ) And, more trees in
parking lots/commercial areas for natural shade. I am super -excited to see that the trail around Hwy 24 and Taylor Notion
may be completed in the near future! Yaay! : ) Another reason to be sure that the businesses have bike lockups and enough
space for people casually dropping in to sit-down and enjoy their coffee/meal, etc, inside or outside. Lastly, I purchased a
home in Star Hill North, and there is an access trail (to/in the Croatan Forest?) very near, but I haven't found any up-to-
date info on it. I think this could be a great resource, but haven't driven down it very far -- concerned that I wouldn't be
able to get back out if needed . Wondering if that was an access point to the water (and what access there would be to/at
the water there), and if it was a maintained/safe trail to use. Seems like it could be a hidden treasure. Thank you for asking
my input : ) "Cape Carteret - Connection, Naturally"
I love the current wooded areas - that there are spaces of undeveloped areas in between houses and inbetween
businesses & around places like the school, and that there's a Croatan trail right in my neighborhood. I have an
idea for a business that would be a community activity area that I hope to start in Cape Carteret, or close by (land
permitting) - (my personal vision for the area ;)). It could be neat to have a camping area in the forest. If there
are issues with the quality of recycling, I think it would be helpful to provide feedback (something San Francisco
did for their curbside pickup). When I researched it & even called WM, I found conflicting information. If I don't
even know if my recycling is proper and I follow 4Ocean's emails & research a lot lol, then I bet that many others
are encountering issues as well. xD

Stability of population density, maintenance of overall environmental quality, preservation of natural areas and
public access to public water bodies and conservation areas for residents. Rational limits to commercial
developments that may have negative impacts to the values noted in the previous sentence.
We would love to have an area for our town to gather and a central area to have tree lightings, local shops and a
chick fil a. No hotels! It would be awesome to be able to get to know each other as neighbors better!
Controlled development with small town feel. Limit big box stores. Preservation of natural areas and waterway,
including limiting run off into sound and creeks. Preserve natural protection of waterways.
a few more good restaurants like Denny's also Trader Joe's and Sams club
I would like to see limited growth concentrating in high end specially shops and NOT a multitude of businesses
existing strictly for the purposes of tax revenue. I truly would like to see Cape Carteret maintain its small town
appeal and not overbuild whereas we would appear as Swansboro does today. Thank you for the opportunity to
express my thoughts on this important topic.
Our vision is that it remain a charming small town filled with single-family residences and basic services.
I would love to see the town keep that small town appeal. Large lots and not over development. We need
wetlands and an answer to the flooding. Parking lots with absorbent concrete not just runoff into our yards from
the roads. Exceed the minimum of state and federal requirements. Be the example for development not the
reason why new regulations are needed. We have a wonderful small town let's get the town the infrastructure it
needs to keep people here and to keep them and their property safe. There is no reason that water runoff is
destroying people's property every time it rains because of mismanagement and the lack of rainwater drainage.
Let's actually be storm ready and be prepared instead of reactive to every little rainstorm. Road water is not
supposed to be draining into residential yards. Create wetlands for these systems to drain into. Become the status
quo for the region to look up to.
Take care of your existing citizens storm water run off problems before asking us for more tax money for
accesses, trails, etc. 24 hour restaurant like Denny's would offer food around the clock.
I would like to open by saying I have solid faith in our town leaders and applaud your efforts to keep our town a
safe, beautiful and accessible place to live. I'm sure my thoughts for some ways our town improve or grow are
similar to yours and many of our residents.
My wish is that we continue to create opportunity for improved quality of life for all residents. Plan growth
strategically to increase revenue, preserve the health of our local waterways and improve our quality of life. I
think we should take advantage of the potential to build revenue from tourism. We are in a prime location to draw
folks to the area with the nature, activities, history and right here in our own backyard. Maybe we start with a
small hotel like the one recently built next to the water park in Emerald Isle? Additionally, is it time to define
areas for more commercial development such as small businesses - restaurants (no need for more fast food
please) or retail?
We've made great strides forward. The pedestrian path has had a good start. Let's work to make town commercial
areas and public spaces more easily accessible for residents by finishing these bike, walking paths and trails.
Thank you for looking at additional ways to access the water. The new kayak launch is a great addition. My hope
is that the town will revisit a place for an additional residential boat launch and continue to make improvements
to the existing launch. Is there opportunity for a larger park space or build on existing green spaces?
Other thoughts ... Is there a short term or long term plan to bring etj area into full jurisdiction? How could that
benefit us?
Look for grant opportunities to improve failing septic systems for residents in an effort to minimize seepage into
our waterways. Continue with best practices of storm water mitigation and flood prevention. Is there a way to
search areas that may have historical artifacts that can help to tell our town story or pre town history? This could
work to deepen our towns identity and historic footprint.
Thank you
Family friendly, safe town with events, parks, restaurants, a main street, water access and quality infrastructure
to support growth.
Hi - I have filled out the survey and added items to the interactive map. Over the last several years, I have
requested that the ditches along my road be dug out. This is part of the routine maintenance the town should do
to keep storm water from accumulating in my yard. I'd like to request this be done as soon as possible. The
machinery to do this is already here and the whole thing would only take a few hours. My yard always floods and I
keep asking for this to be done, but it has not yet been done.
To develop a responsible attitude toward the land and citizens. Consideration for how continuing to cut into forests
effect climate and wildlife. To keep a small town feel and yet not be selfish about sharing with other folks who
wish to be a part of this area.
No Mvrtle Beach tvoe crime or development

APPENDIX C.0
SURVEY RESULTS
SUMMARY
149
2 CAPE Cq9
F
o m
r �
2CRTH C AaC�`�P

I I
LVJ16 mrSa
September 28, 2021
Better Water Quality
SS ChA'ace
rL-6
More Green LL sp
Limit Large CaTsineybel Prfjeris NA DVYtUj: r - �m Me ML*j .. . . . -%� .
Berter Preparation for Erv, i, u,jaiiental-Disas IV -.I:
U I 'e F t,bJ L! Better Infrastructure
More SidewalkBikP
Better Comme uray aFeeth Weery Yard Waste P i ck
E, r P�! Cie 5 L�!'j,j) "r.1 i I i Ij Vj I -
Tjj- I t - - Balanced Business/ Residentid Blend
Quaint Shopping Complex At Rt 24 & 58
Lu" mil'. Pe&ideunal 14ojen Nici i t: NahLral VM11siLlp T) ft�s
Atmo
Retain tl1(C'9rltV QualityAnienities
a own, , . spfiere
To Feel like a Cal-IRMUI-Aty FW;'I L Troilo e al _' a -acte Keep the Same
Traditional American Values TownNo overcrowolng
Retain Small To-mi C harni
More Useful Businesses
&iwa Lacal rivvpm:1111 i. 1 1 1 - I I , i Better Vehicle Tiraffi c
kUM42aselDetTer Sm 3
F
To tw naorrd Dog Friendly
BEL L13L C ommercial Z,3FI,,,l,No PotholeSI-ower Taxes
Ah I c, t Li
bnd QL 6
Coope with Tv r i sol
Better Tbwn'�°ntiesk6, - ineako
H-,(-!11'R2-i1..:! Retail Diversity
Keep the Wooded Areas
A Pe 0
o A
�'N CA]51"

I] I
The Town of Cape Carteret distributed a survey between May 2021 and September 2021 to solicit initial
public input for the Coastal Area Management Act Plan update. There were a total of 223 responses,
representing 9.3% of Cape Carteret's 2,403 residents. The following pages summarize the 12 question
resident survey regarding demographics, conditions, and thoughts on different topics.
Relationship to the Town
Of the total survey respondents, 77% reside
within the Town Limits, 45% tend to visit or
shop within Cape Carteret, 38% own property
within the Town, and the remainder are part
time residents or simply work within the Town.
Why Cape Carteret?
Out of full time residents in the Town's reason
for living in Cape Carteret, the majority (30%)
indicated that they retired here and 28%
stated that they moved for employment within
the Town or its environs. Only 5% identified
themselves as either born and raised here and
the remaining 37% lived in the Town for reasons
that were not mentioned.
LIVE, WORK, SHOP OR OWN PROPERTY IN CAPE CARTERET
I own property in None of the above,
Tana rnrtarat 0.5%
I work in Cape Cart I live in Cape Carteret
Figure 1: Live, Work, Visit, Shop
Residents were asked how long they have lived in Town. 32% have only been a resident for less than 5
years. 23% have lived in the Town for 5 to 10 years, 25.9% have lived between 10 to 20 years, and 18.9%
have lived in the Town for over 20 years.
Age
The largest majority (29.7%) of respondents
fell into the 65 and older range. The second
largest percentage were 55-64 year olds
with 22.5%. The remaining respondents
were divided between 45-54 years old
with 21.6%, 16.2% 35-44 years old, 8.1%
being in the 25-34 year old bracket and
the remaining 1.9% at 25 and under.
Of those who answered the survey almost
60% of the residents did not live in a home
with children, while the other 40% did.
65+, 29.7%
55-64, 22.5%
18-24, 1.4%
35-44, 16.2%
L45-54, 21.6%
2

Satisfaction
The next set of questions asked the satisfaction level of the respondents with the Town.This included
what the respondents thought were the best aspects, as well as what could be improved upon.
Close proximity to the water was the top response and the general quality of life and "small town
character" were the next two highest ranking. (Figure 3)
Key words and phrases about
items that residents felt should
be improved within the Town
are displayed in the word cloud
to the left. There were a total of
172 results for this question out
of 223 total responses. The topics
are sized and colored according to
how many times the answer was
repeated.
Community activities
.
Residential character
Small town character
Proximity to the water
Quality of schools
Quality of life
Other (please specify)
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
Figure 3: Best Aspect of Cape Carteret
Need Sewer Service Some of the top responses
Less CommercializationBe Pva�P�„nG
�,...��"'� include, Less Traffic, Better Drainage, More Trees/
Traffic cameras
AeSthetiCS-'r..
Development &c[crn�¢nr�s�—r•� kA
c—Pke- &[nxm R�ci-0 Less Flooding
Sharing
,1!�ral Lk —my
More Chalking Trils Le Growth
Less'
Traffit lal
Better Traffic Management�e�
Less Rental Properc es
V1TaIkabd it of Tour°n`''
Parks, More/Better Local Businesses, Less
Commercialization and the Aesthetics of the
Town. (Figure 4)
Environmental Concerns
The survey also asked what the residents felt
y c—lka were the environmental conditions that primarily
Kee
M�vc Small Town Feel Le--sPeople
pmaaffected their property or life in general while
Trees�Ce living in Cape Carteret. Of the 161 responses, 50%
More Retail Opportunities stated that the increased intensity of storms adversely
Less Truck Traffic
impacted their lives and/or property. The other top
Parking Amenigesfor lZmdeits responses included general flooding, septic issues, and
sum °"` ""` erosion of the land.
�Le'ss"'Noise
Less Speeding
Rnv-Rynp Fmennhc[u.an�
Less Pavet
More Local/Small Businesses
Less Roadway Trash
More Canmunity Activities
EldexlP�Suucr Hwsmg
Figure 4: What should be different with the Town
Survey Summary
3

Quality of Life
The next set of questions covered life in the Town, ranging in scope from the character to the type of
development that should be pursued over the next 20 years.
A majority responded that improvements to infrastructure, amenities, keeping a small town atmosphere
and more useful businesses were important for the future. The word cloud below depicts the way the that
respondents indicated their interest on a variety of topics.
Better Waiver {duality
More Green'"space
Limit Large Cam merdel Prnjer:; _ �;, o.is�«���r�.:
f ('fH}]aI�'7t1111i n'll'OI7ilit111.
Mona Si�.fe.h:, l,s B etter Infrastructure
Bike PathBetter Community Feel Weekly Yard Waste Pickup
Pct1,'. I Pcticatri•W c1.,1111ccuv11) Balanced Business/Residential Blend
Quaige nt Shopping Complex At Rt 24 &„5�Sw�lk��
letu Retain Integrity i2u�lty Aural Wa =
Small T6w'n Atm?erS here
To Feel like a Community Boa LTl.iili,. l,7 ti1B4 N0tLill 1il lleta111 (s(1:iTJL�Same
Traditional American Values TownNo vercrowdBusinesses
a— Retain Small Town �'arm
"`° `° 01 "„o 16 55"5 Better Vehicle Traffic
To be rnore Dog Ff--kill; ■ ■ PotholeS,
'over Taxes
Barnrr C mmardal Zoning 111 _ LLo Ahlc to Cope with Tnurisin
Better Tawn°A"ffienitie
Detail Diversity
Keep the Wooded Areas
It was also asked what the character
of the incoming developments should
be. 35.5% stated that they would like
something other than the listed areas.
27.6% of respondents showed interest
in development of a mixed -use
Figure 5: Opinion of 20 year plans
WHAT SHOULD THE CHARACTER OF THAT DEVELOPMENT BE?
Highway -oriented to bring in
■ visitors and residents from
neighboring localities
Residential development removed
from NC 58 and NC 24
Two- and three-story buildings to
add density
character not fronting the highways. Mixed -use development, not
There were very few responses fronting NC 58 or NC 24
suggesting that the character of
development should add two or three Other (please specify)
story buildings for density.
Figure 6: Character of Development
El
2 °APE C,q9
F
S� p
° m
y°RrH cAa°�`�P

Priorities and Comments
The final survey question was open-ended and asked what the respondents wanted to share with the
planning team regarding the update to the CAMA Plan. As you can see below, there were many responses.
The topics mentioned ranged from infrastructure, commercial development, stormwater management,
population growth, and parks and recreation. The graphic below brings together those various comments.
These will inform the planning process and help create the vision, goals, objectives, and strategies.
Better Drainage
Address Noise an Light Pollution
Consider Negative Effect on Coastal Area
Overpass/ Roo dAnl eded 1 8 pra4
Meflt
Provide Roc.�yFling EvOnts Keep FarrsilylVacation Atmosphere
h1stR11 Speod Burnps; Cameras on 24 Local Culture becoming less Local
Continue to get input from cit""e Impacts on Water uality
Lari(%r; 4lp im rear' 1V '� R P��rd Licari
Provide Frequent Yard Waste Pickup
Wp{'jierc ifftTmrw owl RP tu�rrkr1_1 aJlibiflis? aboulBe8dty ofT4+v.,Decrease in PoI"1C" uIation Don L71 Needed
Manage GrowthLimit Sprawl
Nq CnimmroiAl Bu6ne&ms in Residenliai Areas
Provide 0pporlumties for Environmental Community Service.
Focus on Grants to Complete Ped/Bike trails Marc Crosswalks
Liitut Number of RV parks C+JIi'r'iL-' I(. 2i��"W3:kiLl l IaiI Park
Concentrate -Dn Re air[Mainteriance of urrent items Dog
Keep Small Town Charm Feel
i=inishi g Path wouLd Increase Traff4- w Local Cu_i.rts s oiiven 1 t ❑ I a for KId 4o ❑ ICE
Pothole repairs Necessary nDredgePtifop, Creek
More Shoppingopportunitieslhu- ue�u >c��n p+ mmA-.% Iwe
Residents' Use of $oaL Rarnps should be Free .address ieafiic Issues CC] 4 towards Island
Infrastructure lrnproveinernts Needed Fix the Roads
Moi a Pub];c Access to Waterfi ont Areas
Gaver riient too 1nVolved Crnisidar Naha EflFess or Urban 1)P%m1opT1nM
More CGmmunicaCon Bev eeai Town and Residents
FoliceArk dRkrrWmice$weyoodI)-* Torri' w1wwo'"K'Miliniiiweg0A'*B?6-FF'k
Limit Commercial Dcvelopmentl ong stion
Increase Police Presence an Traffic Issues
Mandate a Unifying Design Standard
Limit Growth
Survey Summary 5

APPENDIX D0
.
GREEN STORMWATER
INFRASTRUCTURE
The following document was created to illustrate ways in which Cape Carteret can
use nature -based solutions to stormwater management techniques to not only
preserve life and property but to increase aesthetic appeal and create wildlife
habitats.
150
_ CAPE cq9
F
s' A
O m
F -1
y0
gTH cAa����P

GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
fi DESCRIPTION
Coastal flooding can result from a variety of causes. King tides, hurricanes, high water tables, and heavy rains are just a few
of the factors that lead to soggy yards and water on roads. Living in these conditions can be a challenge, but there are some
strategies that can mitigate these hazards.
Green stormwater infrastructure, also referred to as `Nature -Based Solutions (NBS)', `Best Management Practices (BMP)',
and `Low Impact Development (LID)', intends to mimic hydrological processes that existed pre -development. Impermeable
surfaces such as roofs, asphalt roads, and concrete sidewalks have replaced the natural flood alleviation measures that
previously existed such as wetlands, forests, and prairies. By thoughtfully designing new construction and retrofitting existing
sites where appropriate, green stormwater infrastructure solutions create a decentralized network of locations where runoff
from storms can be captured and treated.
These solutions have proven to improve water quality of local surface waters, mitigate flooding from storms, and demonstrate
more cost effectiveness than traditional stormwater management practices which include curbs, drains, and pipes. Rather than
allowing rainwater to wash off roads and driveways into the nearest storm drain and enter the nearest creek, interventions such
as rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable pavers slow the runoff and give it a chance to infiltrate the ground where it can be
filtered and treated.
J/ BENEFITS
INCREASED PROPERTY FLOODING MITIGATION WATER QUALITY POLLINATOR HABITAT AIR QUALITY
VALUE IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT
// EXAMPLES

;I
O CAPTURE STORMWATER CLOSE TO WHERE IT FALLS
i
PREVENT EROSION BY SLOWING RUNOFF
O FILTER CONTAMINANTS FROM THE STORMWATER
7RESHWATER PONDS
& WETLANDS
These ecosystems act as sponges
+ during rain events and provide
biodiversity
IMPERMEABLE! M C1
�•: 1200ft2 of impermeable
surface generates 748llons
of runoff for 1"of rainfall �
DOWNSPOUT DISCONNECT
Directing roof runoff into vegetation such
as a lawn, planting bed, or rain garden is an
excellent way to capture and treat it
^ `r
RAIN BARRELS
r z These can serve to capture runoff and
potentially be used for irrigation
MARITIME FOREST
Mature forests generate very little runoff;
rainfall is absorbed and vegetation allows
transpiration
�ys1.
EXCESS NUTRIENT RUNOFF
Runoff that carries bacteria from
pet waste and nutrients from
excess fertilizer causes damage
to aquatic ecosystems
TIDAL CREEKS & WETLANDS
These fish and shellfish nurseries
provide flood & erosion control
while cleaning the water
and allowing for recreation
opportunities
GREY INFRASTRUCTURE
Traditional pipe to surface water
drainage creates a highway for
intaminants to enter waterways; hea
storms can lead to high velocities of
water which creates erosion
AUTO CONTAMINANTS
Heavy metals and oil from cars enter the
waterways via stormdrains and culverts
INCREASED TREES & SHRUBS
More trees, shrubs, and other vegetation
increases transpiration rates
PERMEABLE PAVERS
This alternative paving option has many
varieties and allows for -70% infiltration
RAIN GARDENS BIOSWALE��
About 10% the size of the
home, these depressed gardens Similar to a linear rain garden, these
temporarily capture runoff and filter vegetated depressions run along roads
contaminants via the plants and capture runoff from cars

fi STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Green stormwater infrastructure design solutions are non-traditional and often need an explanation. The best implementation
strategies are multi -faceted and community -led efforts which retrofit existing sites and prioritize these techniques for new
developments.
ETROFITTING EXISTING SITES
r Q START A WEBPAGE
Create a webpage where homeowners,
builders, and other stakeholders can
find resources regarding flooding,
water quality, and what kind of green
infrastructure solution best meets their
needs.
`EXAMPLES
V Q GTON City of Wilmington `Heal Our
Waterways' Website
®^NAG5 HEAD Town of Nags Head
,� a Stormwater Management
ENVISIONING THE CHANGE
IM CREATE DISTRIBUTION MATERIALS
Develop and distribute materials for
homeowners to help inform about the
impacts of runoff and the next steps
they can take in order to capture and
treat water that falls on their property.
EXAMPLES
.. NC Cooperative Extension
Rain Garden Manual
North Carolina NC Coastal Federation
flo� Coastal Federation
rr m.o r— Stormwater Strategies Fact
Sheets
Simple design solutions can make all the difference between a site that generates
runoff and a site that captures and treats runoff. Some of the easiest retrofits are
raingardens; they are a beautiful way to mitigate flooding and prevent contaminants
such as bacteria from pet waste and fertilizer from lawns from entering the
waterways.
Wo - -
SET UP A PILOT SITE
Establish a pilot site at a residence
using smaller scale green stormwater
infrastructure options. Monitor this
location to educate residents about
maintenance needs and showcase the
benefits.
EXAMPLES E
4PciTrolcHaRLoTre Charlotte -Mecklenburg -
Pilot Stormwater Control
Measures Program
NATIVE PLANTS
Native plants are recommended for
stormwater treatment; they provide
habitat for native pollinators and their
adaptability means they require less
maintenance and care. Check out some
of the showy native species below.
BEAUTYBERRY
Callicarpa americana
MUHLY GRASS
Muhlenbergia capillaris
BLACK EYED SUSAN
Rudbeckia fulgida
BIG BLUESTEM
Andropogongerardii

`PLANNING FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
ff BUFFER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
Allot buffers that protect wetlands
and other ecological assets; doing
so can reduce the impact of future
development. This strategy also allows
residents to continue to benefit from the
ecosystem services provided by these
sites such as flooding mitigation, water
quality improvement, and biodiversity.
RECOMMENDED AQUATIC HABITAT BUFFERS
HABITAT EXAMPLE RECOMMENDATION
Marine
Tidal wetlands,
200' from
mudflats
high tide
Estuarine
Bays, marshes
100' from
high tide
Riverine
Streams, rivers
Tidal &
Perennial - 100'
Intermittent - 50'
Lacustrine
Lakes, ponds
>50 acres - 100'
<50 acres - 50'
Pacustrine
non -tidal wetlands,
100'
vernal pools
sustainablesites.org
PROMOTE GSI IN NEW CONSTRUCTION
Require that future developments
capture and treat stormwater on site.
Green stormwater infrastructure
techniques such as bioswales, cisterns,
and constructed wetlands can help to
ensure that existing flooding conditions
won't be exasperated by increased
impervious surface.
Sierra Nevada Brewing in Mills River, NC
is a great example of green stormwater
infrastructure practices.
// RESOURCES AND REFERENCES
aeB ENGAGE THE COMMUNITY
Hold community engagement events
during the planning process for new
development. Green stormwater
infrastructure solutions are impactful,
but only if community members see
the benefits and advocate for their
implementation.
NC Coastal Federation - Low Impact Development for the North Carolina Coast
NC Coastal Federation - Nature -based Stormwater Stratevies to Reduce FloodinLy and Imurove Water Oualit
NC Coastal Federation - Smart Yards DIY Solutions to Reduce Stormwater Pollution
NC Department
of Environmental
Quality
- Riparian Buffer Protection Program
NC Department
of Environmental
Quality
- Stormwater
NC Department
of Environmental
Quality
- Stormwater LID and Storm EZ
NC Department
of Encironmental
Quality
- Coastal Adaptation & Resiliency
NC Department
of Encironmental
Oualitv
- Climate Risk Assessment & Resilience Plan
Low Impact Development Center
US Environmental Protection Agency - Green Infrastructure
FEMA - Building Community Resilience with Nature -Based Solutions
Green Values - Stormwater Management Calculator

APPENDIX E.0
SLOSH MAPS
SLOSH refers to Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes. This map depicts the
storm surge areas affected by a Category 1 through 5 Hurricane. For a more detailed
description please refer to page 64.
CAMA and Comprehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22 151

Legend
r=Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
Storm Surge (feet above ground)
- Up to 3 feet above ground
Greater than 3 feet above ground
- Greater than 6 feet above ground
- Greater than 9 feet above ground
0
turce: National Oceanic and Atmo-
heric Administration(NOAA)/Nation-
Hurricane Center(NHC)
N
A
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
® Feat
MAY 2021
SUMMIT
152 Ii

' NN
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
®FW
MAY 2021
L ®SUBMIT
i
Legend
r=Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
Storm Surge (feet above ground)
- Up to 3 feet above ground
Greater than 3 feet above ground
- Greater than 6 feet above ground
- Greater than 9 feet above ground
71
rarce: National Oceanic and Atmo-
heric Administration(NOAA)/Nation-
Hurricane Center(NHC)
� O ■
r O ■
. 1O
00 1
L
■
o ■
1
y � ■
Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22

•
N
A
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
® Feat
MAY 2021
SUMMIT
Legend
r=Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
Storm Surge (feet above ground)
- Up to 3 feet above ground
Greater than 3 feet above ground
Greater than 6 feet above ground
- Greater than 9 feet above ground
turce: National Oceanic and Atmo-
heric Administration(NOAA)/Nation-
Hurricane Center(NHC)
� O 1
i
b 1
■
is
•
1
U — 1
■
154

Legend
—Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
Storm Surge (feet above ground)
- Up to 3 feet above ground
Greater than 3 feet above ground
Greater than 6 feet above ground
- Greater than 9 feet above ground
lurce: National Oceanic and Atmo-
heric Administration(NOAA)/Nati
Hurricane Center(NHC)
aoINV Fr
Q
•
9 Q 3 1 a` a •
■
•
I ■
0 173330 700 7,050 1,400 1
®Feet C •
MAY 2021 J�`_\ _���.•i
®wPt41T ��J �
and Com-Drehensive Plan CRC Certification Date 11-14-22

400000o Q ���\
O \/
r Legend
v
!� r=Town of Cape Carteret Boundary
NOAA SLOSH Mapping
L. Storm Surge (feet above ground)
- Up to 3 feet above ground
Greater than 3 feet above ground
- Greater than 6 feet above ground
Greater than 9 feet above ground
I O
NEr
:7 Po o
0
turce: National Oceanic and Atmo-
heric Administration(NOAA)/Nati
Hurricane Center(NHC)
0 175350 700 1,050 1,400
Soma Fea p
MAY 2021
SUMMIT
156

APPENDIX F.0
MAIN STREET/TOWN
CENTER CONCEPT
At the request of the Town, the following document was created to illustrate the
concept of a medium -density mixed -use Town Center centered around a new
"Main Street." The images are purely conceptual in nature and are to be used for
discussion purposes only. Any and all designs are subject to change.
157
of CAPE C9
o m
r _1
2ORTH C AaC�`�P

OVERVIEW
This document explores a preliminary concept for developing a mixed -use Town Center in Cape Carteret. 11
is meant to be used for discussion purposes only and does not constitute any agreement on the part of the
Town or any property owner. Any and all aspects of this concept are subject to change.
SUMMISERT Cottages, Bungalows, and Patio Homes
Town Center Conceptual Plan — Cape Carteret, NC

SUMMIT Cottages, Bungalows, and Patio Homes
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
Town Center Conceptual Plan — Cape Carteret, NC 2

USUMMIT Town Center Mixed Use
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
Town Center Conceptual Plan — Cape Carteret, NC

e •�
cf�13',i qa
ro.
N-
L
w m
01
v `I
ti7
I J —
Y Ii 4';
f F
1P