NCDOT 118-01 North Creek

Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA �((
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Permit
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Permit Number
118-01
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 1587, Greenville, NC 27835
Authorizing development in Beaufort County at At the crossing of North Creek a tributary of the
Pamlico River. SR 1722 in Ransomville, as requested in the permittee's application dated 6/6/Ol including
attached the workplan drawings (2): 1 dated as received on 6/8/O1; and 1 dated 6/5/O1
This permit, issued on 9/28/Ol , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Replace existine bridge #127 with 3 corrugated aluminum structural plate arch pipes with headwalls
1) In order to protect anadromous fish populations, no in -water work shall be conducted between February
15 to June 15 of any year without the prior approval of the Division of Coastal Management, in
consultation with the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
2) The culvert inverts must be buried at least one foot below normal streambed elevation to allow for
passage of water and aquatic life.
3) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in any wetlands or waters of the United States
outside of the alignment of the fill area as indicated on the workplan drawing(s).
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
'1'ms permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December Al, 2004
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
JXdfina D. Moffitt, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
a

N.C. Department of Transportation
Permit #118-01
Page 2 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4) No excavation shall occur within wetlands or waters of the United States, except for that depicted on the
attached workplan drawings.
5) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated
wetlands is not authorized. This condition also applies to removal of the existing bridge structure.
6) Live concrete shall not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
7) The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities and all permanent fill
material. must be obtained from an upland source.
8) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or irregularly
flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of solids into any
vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters.
9) Debris resulting from demolition of the existing bridge, including deck components, shall not enter
wetlands or waters of the United States, even temporarily.
10) All excavated materials and debris associated with the removal of the existing bridge will be disposed of
- at an approved upland disposal site.
Ditch Relocation
11) The relocated ditch shall not be placed within wetlands or waters of the United States.
12) Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent short term and ]on- term erosion of the side slopes of the
short section of ditch relocated on the southwestern comer of the project area.
13) The cut or filled slopes of the relocated ditch shall be at an angle that can be retained by vegetative or
other appropriate cover.
14) Excavation of the new short section of ditch located on the southwestem corner of the project area as
depicted on the attached workplan drawings shall not exceed a depth of 4 feet and shall not exceed a
width of 6 feet.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
15) This project must conform to all requirements of the NC Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and NC
DOT's Memorandum of Agreement with the Division of Land Resources.
16) Immediately prior to the initiation of construction, the permittee shall install turbidity curtains in the
water area immediately adjacent to the replacement culverts at North Creek. The turbidity curtains shall
be removed when turbidity within the curtains reaches ambient levels.-•;=,
17) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction must not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.

N.C. Department of Transportation Permit #118-01
Page 3 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
18) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures must be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses and property (e.g. silt fence,
diversion swales or berms, sand fence, etc.).
19) All disturbed areas shall be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion
within fifteen days of project completion.
20) The activitywill be conducted in such a manner as :to prevent a significant increase in turbidity outside
the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that the turbidity. in the
waterbody is 25 NTU's or less in all saltwater classes are not considered significant.
21) .. This project is in a High Quality Water Zone and must comply with the Design Standards in. Sensitive
_ , Watersheds, 15A NCAC 4B .0124 (25 year type H storm, 70% trapping efficiency :for +39 micron size
particle in 2 year storm).
22) The permittee shall follow Best Management Practices for the 'Protection of Surface Waters and
sedimentation and erosion control measures, sufficient to protect aquatic resources.
General
23) If the permittee determines that additional permanent and/or temporary impacts (such as temporary
access roads, detours, or matting to transport equipment across wetlands).will occur that are not shown
on the attached permit drawings, additional authorization from DCM will be required. Depending upon
the magnitude of the impacts and the habitat types that are impacted, additional DCM authorization.may
be in the form of a refinement of this permit or a permit modification.
24) The relocation of any utility lines will require additional authorization, either by way of a modification
of this permit or by the utility company obtaining separate authorization.
25) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal,
relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work herein authorized, or if in the opinion of the
Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable
obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice
from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions caused
thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be made
against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or alteration.
26) This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits, approvals
or authorizations that may be required. This includes approval, if required, from the N.C. Division of
Water Quality under stormwater management rules of the Environmental Management Commission. If
a Stormwater Management Permit is required, it must be obtained and a copy provided to DCM prior to
initiation of construction. .
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Quality has authorized the proposed project under General Water
Quality Certification No. 3274 (DWQ Project No. 01-1084), which was issued do 7125/O1.

N.C. Department of Transportation
Permit #118-01
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action ID. No.
200110959.
NOTE: The permittee and/or his contractor is strongly encouraged to contact DCM's Field
Representative for: Transportation Projects at [phone] to request a preconstruction
conference prior to project initiation.
NOTE: The permittee is encouraged to contact the Public Health Pest Management Section at (919) 733-
6407 to discuss mosquito control measures.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
41
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD ar/
1) APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation County: Beaufort
LOCATION OF PROJECT: On SR 1722 in Ransomville at the crossing of North Creek, a tributary of the
Pamlico River.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: June 8, 2001
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: Yes To Be Forwarded: No
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Bill Arrington
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW:
B) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED IN RALEIGH:
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D:
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES RECD:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE:
FEDERAL DUE DATE:
DISTRICT OFFICE: Morehead\
FEE REC'D:$
END OF NOTICE DA
DEED RECD:
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DA
FED COMMENTS RECD:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
DRAFT
AGENCY
DATECOMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management - Regional Representative
Coastal Management - LUP Consistency
Division of Community Assistance
Land Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Storm Water Management (DWQ)
State Property Office
Division of Archives & History
Division of Environmental Health
Division of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Division. of Water Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
Submerged Lands (DMF)

MEMORANDUM:
TO: DOUG HUGGETT
FROM: Bill Arrington
SUBJECT: COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - CAMA MAJOR PERMIT —
Bridge 127, State Road 1722, Beaufort County
DATE: June 29, 2001
The following are my comments and recommendations regarding the above mentioned proposal.
The project consists of replacing the existing bridge with 3 culverts. The pavement width will remain
the same and the shoulders will be widened just enough for compliance with Federal and State
Highway Standards. Relatively small areas of 404 wetlands, and shallow bottom will be filled at the
North Creek crossing. The impacts from this project would be considered minimal by the Division of
Coastal Management and would qualify for a General Permit except that North Creek is Primary
Nursery Area. The NC DOT has done a commendable job minimizing the impacts from their original
proposal to install 70-foot culverts with 8-foot shoulders and 8 to 10 foot slopes with riprap. North
Creek is joint waters. Comments from the agencies regulating these waters (as it pertains to PNA's)
will determine my recommendation. The project is well designed with minimization of impacts. Without
strong objections from fishery agencies, I would recommend the project be approved contingent upon
the following conditions:
1) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
2) No excavated or rill material will be placed at any time, in any marsh or surrounding waters,
outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the work plats.
3) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or
irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent
spillover of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
4) The roadway fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities.
5) In order to protect water quality, runoff from the construction must not visibly increase the
amount of suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
Cc: Terry Moore, DCM
Charles Jones, DCM

North Carolina ALTT4
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management —
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
July 29, 2001
Washington Daily News
Legal Advertisement Section
P.O. Box 1788
Washington, N.C. 27889
Re: Public Notice - N.C. Department of Transportation
Dear Sir:
Please publish the attached Notice in the Tuesday, July 3, 2001, issue of the Washington Daily News.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication prior to
payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original copy of the published
notice, and an original invoice to Jaye Poole, NC Division of Coastal Management, 1638 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638, Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please contact me at our
Morehead City office.
Sincerely,
Bill Arrington
Coastal Management Representative
Enclosure
cc: Doug Huggett
Ted Tyndall, District Manager
Morehead City District \ 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone:[phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- SO%RECYCLED / 10%POST CONSUMER PAPER

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as
required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an Area of
Environmental Concern as designated under the CAMA was received on June 8, 2001. According
to said application, the N.C. Department of Transportation proposes to replace Bridge #127 on SR
1722, in Ransomville, Beaufort County. A copy of the entire application may be examined or
copied at the office of Bill Arrington, NC Division of Coastal Management, located at 151-B
Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, NC, [phone] during normal business hours.
Comments mailed to Donna D. Moffitt, Director, Division of Coastal Management, 1638
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1638, prior to July 23, 2001, will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time of
permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review and comment by the public and
state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided upon
written request.
PUBLISHED ON: Tuesday, July 3, 2001

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
NCDENR
NORM CAROUI 06bRIT1QIi OF
ENNRONHIX MO N i RA RE RGES
151-B HWY. 24, HESTRON BUILDING
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
TO: �5j1 I n c �e(1��1 t i (1J1s
OFFICE: f o CbA� V14 �Lli c� om� ft�� rrrr
TELEPHONE #: I 1 FAX #:
FROM:
OFFICE: DIVISION OF COASTAL NfANAf;FMENT
M
DATE SENT:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COV R SHFFT:

P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
JUN-29-2001 FRI 01:55 PM
DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE M# DP
JUN-29 01:54 PM 12529469797 50" 3 SEND OK 833
�c �

I
Development Type
FEE
DCM%
DWO%
143001601 4351000931625 6253
243001602 435100095 2341
I. Private, noncommercial
development that does not involve
$250
100%($250)
0 % ($0)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
II. Public or commercial development
that does not Involve the filling or
5400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
excavation of any wetlands or open
-
water areas:
III. For development that involves the
filling andlorexavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
,
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, noncommercial
development, If General water Quality
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
.. can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
. development, if General water Quality
$400
100% (5400)
0% ($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
,
- determined that additional review and
S400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
bemuse of concoms related to water
quality oraquatic life:
III(D). If General WaterQ ahq-�
Certification No. 3301 ea attached)
$400
60%($240)
40% ($160)
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves
'
the filling andfor excavation of more
5476
60%($285)
40%($190)
than one acre of wetlands andlor
i
open water areas:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation- SR 1722
Beaufort Co.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Replace bridge 127 on SR 1722, in Ransomville,
with 3 culverts at the crossing of North Creek, a tributary of the Pamlico River.
Photo Index -2000: Flight Line 106 / #1304 B:16
State Plane Coordinates x: 2,689,600 y: 628,000
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit-6/25/2001 & 6/28/2001
Was Applicant Present - No, (Jay Johnson, DEO)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 6/8/2001
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan -Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Rural with Services - CONSERVATION
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT, EW and CS
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned -None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Roadway, Bridge
Planned - Replacement of bridge with culverts
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
Eve-Av.,ited Filled Other
(A) Coastal Wetlands- Cladium
0
jamaicense, Scirpus spp., S.
0
c nosuroides
Shallow Bottom
1750 sf
( same 1750 sf)
(C) Other Wetlands
124 sf
High Ground excavation at culverts
0
High Ground disturbance (in road R/W)
96 sf
7. (Continued)
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 0.040 acres
(E) Total area disturbed by project 0.045 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: YES
(G) Water Classification: C Sw NSW (above the bridge) SA HQW NSW (below the
bridge) Open for Shellfishing: NO

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — SR 1722, Beaufort Co.
June 29, 2001
PAGE 2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is the N.C. Department of Transportation. The
proposal is to replace the degraded timber bridge with 3 corrugated aluminum structural plate
pipe arches with head walls and wing walls. This will allow 8 foot shoulders that comply with
State Highway standards for secondary roads.
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is State Road 1722, at the crossing of North Creek, in the community of
Ransomville, Beaufort County, NC. The road is approximately 3 feet above NWL. The general
purpose of the project is to replace the deteriorating timber bridge with culverts, to allow for a 22
foot pavement width and 8 foot shoulder width. The bridged crossing at North Creek is flanked
with wooded Pine/Gum swamp wetlands, coastal wetlands, pasture and residential land. This area
is primarily residential, agricultural and undeveloped wooded swamp and forest. The site consists
of a 20' wide creek downstream of the crossing. The creek widens adjacent to the bridge to 25' at
the south side and 31' at the north side. At the north side of the bridge (upstream), the creek
branches to the main stream (15% a smaller steam (8') and a ditch. The coastal wetland consists
of Spartina cynosuroides, Scirpus spp. and Cladium jamaicense. The adjacent uplands are
pastuelands, agricultural fields, residential land and forested, and are vegetated primarily with
various elm, pines, cedar, gum, grasses and wheat. North Creek is Joint waters at the project
site, and is classified SA HQW NSW between the Pamlico River and SR 1722 and classified C Sw
NSW between SR 1722 and its headwaters by the Division of Water Quality and subject to the
Tar -Pamlico River Buffer Rules. The area is closed to shellfishing, and is designated as primary
nursery area by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. The Beaufort County Land Use
Plan designates the project area as Rural with Services , with all areas lying within CAMA Areas
of Environmental Concern, designated as Conservation.
The proposal is to replace the existing 30 feet wide by 35 feet long timber bridge with three 97'
wide x 6'6" tall x 49'6" long corrugated aluminum structural plate pipe arch's (culverts) on the
existing alignment. The addition20 foot width will allow for 8 foot road shoulders as required for
State Highway standards. The ends of the culverts will be stabilized with headwalls and wingwalls
to eliminate the need for slopes extending into coastal shoreline, esturine waters, public trust
waters, 404 type wetlands and coastal wetlands. The approaching roadway will be unchanged.
Best Management Practices will be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT - SR 1722, Beaufort Co.
June 29, 2001
PAGE 3
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the replacement of the existing bridge with three culverts will result in the following
impacts: Approximately 124 square feet of 404 type wetlands will be filled by road shoulder, and
1750 square feet of shallow bottom will be filled by culverts and fill surrounding the culverts.
Approximately 96 square feet of high ground will be graded, filled or excavated for the roadway
and paving. There is a high probability of turbidity to be expected during the replacement of the
culverts. Stringent sedimentation/erosion control measures can minimize this. The NC DOT has
reduced their original proposal to install 70 foot culverts with sloped road shoulders to the shorter
49'6" culverts with head and wing walls in order to avoid the impact of an additional 800 sgare
feet of impacts to shallow bottom, esturine waters , 404 type wetlands and coastal shoreline.
Principally local residents use state Road 1722. The replacement of the bridge with culverts and 8
foot road shoulders will upgrade the crossing to improve safety of traffic movement and have the
comply with State safety standards for secondary roads. North Creek is a Primary Nursery Area
and may be impacted by this project.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 0.045 acres.
Bill Arrington June 29, 2001 Morehead City

Form DCM-MP-1
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants) l+ �� %'•' p
If
z�el
b. City, town, community or landmatk._
Ransomville -mow
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address P.O. Box 1587
City Greenville, State N.C.
Zip 27835 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name. Jay Johnson, -NCDOT Div. 2
Address P.O. Box 1587
City Greenville, State N.C.
Zip 27835 Day Phone [phone]
Fax _(252) 830-3352
c. Project name (if any) Bridge #127 Beaufort Co.
NOTE: Permit will be issued in none oflandovner(s). otdlor
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Beaufort
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1722
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? _ Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g: river,
creek, sound, bay) North Creek
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a (tome, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace Bridge #127 on SR 1722 with 3
Aluminum Arch pipes and backfill/repave over the
culverts.
b. Is the pro(osed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New work
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. Purpose: To upgrade existing Bridge to
improve the safety of traffic movement and to
comply with State safetv standards for secondary
road culvert crossings.
METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION: Standard roadw::
and culvert construction methods: DAILY
OPERATIONS: Convevance of vehicular traffic
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Currituck Muck
e. Vegetation on tract Juncus Roemeranus, Baccaris
Hamilifolia. Tvhpa Spy. Cladium iamaicense,
Phragmites australis, Spartina patens
f. Man-made features now on tract Existing paved
road and timber bridge.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the Site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation
Developed
Rural
X Transitional
_ Community
-_Other Undeveloped
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? _ Yes _ No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ijapplicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? _Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Resister listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
I. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? No
(dttachdocutntentation, ifarailable)
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
jai. O 8 2001
n. Describe location and:type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For exaarple,,sufface�unoff, sanitary
,
wastewater, industria]%commetciat .6ffluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface Runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I V white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed -project to the Division of Coastal

Form DCM-MP-1
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Harriet Ross
Address 1206 Hubs Ree Rd.
Belhaven, NC 27810
Name Jean S. Woolard
Address 3467 Davenport Fork Rd.
Creswell, NC 27928
Name Maggie Lee Clayton
Address 230 S. Savannah Rd.
Belhaven, N.C.27810
Name
Address
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $400 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
i,• ,; 1,
the application. �f e' piojecM be subject to condition:
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that -to the°liesf of -my -knowledge, the proposec
activity complies with the State of North Carolina'!
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, gram
permission to representatives of state and federal r6ieH
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands, it
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information .provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 6th day of June. 2001 .
Print Name Jay Johnson
Signature (1, �
Lande�6erdAuo&bedAgent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
X DCM MP-3
Upland Development
DCM MP-4
Structures Information
X DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-M -2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project. NSA
Describe below the purpose of proposedexcavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic vards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes No
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions.of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
_ Yes No
If no, attach, a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? —Yes _.No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-M -2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION N/A
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
_Bulkhead _Riprap
a
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding,12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
It. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
If yes,
i : U /001 -
i
(1) Amount of material to;:be`placed' in the
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
—Yes—No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example; dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site! _ Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
NCDOT Beaufort # 127
Applicant or Proket Nance
Sig q'ro
U V 6�l�oi
Date
.Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed Replace Bridge # 127 with 3
Aluminum Arch pipes, Backfill and repave over
the culverts
b. Number of lots or parcels N/A
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) N/A
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed including
roads, ditches, etc. 36' x 50' =1800 s% ft.
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins. If
applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control
plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? _ Yes X No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
Marl and Asphalt
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. < 10%
It. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Storniwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
_ Yes X No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above received
state or local approval? N/A
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Surface runoff from roadwav: stormwater
capture and retention from upland ditches
diffuse flow into wetlands
Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g.
well, community; public system, etc.)
m. Will water be impounded? _ Yes X No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was
the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
NCDOT Beaufort #127
Applicant or Project Na! e
Signature �V
Date
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes _ No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
_ Yes _No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW orNWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
h. Width of proposed bridge
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
�I
�1 •4 ��1. V � 1 l
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
_ _Yes _ No
Ifyes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes No
If yes, explain
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? _ Yes No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning
their approval?
_ Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
2. CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
North Creek
b. Number of culverts proposed 3
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
Corrugated Aluminum Structural Plate Arch Pine
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
X Yes --No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge35'
(2) Width of existing bridge 29.7
Q) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 2'
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) Entire bridge will be
removed and replaced. Existing bulkheads
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-5
will be left and the pines will be placed
between them.
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW orNWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert 49'6"
g. Width of proposed culvert 3Q, 9' 7"x 6'6" with
headwalls
It. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW orNWL 2'
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
_ Yes X No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? _'Yes X No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW orNWL?
X_Yes
No
If yes,
(1)
Length of area to be excavated 33'
(2)
Width of area to be excavated 50'
(3)
Depth of area to be excavated 2'
(4)
Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 122 cu. vds.
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
_Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes, Open Water
(1) Length of area to be excavated 33'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 50,
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 122 cu. vds.
i` CvO1
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highgrodnd excavation?
X Yes ----
If yes, Removal of bridge
(1) Length of area to be excavated 36'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 30'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 80 cu. Yds.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Temporary spoil area is existing road bed
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
20' x 20'
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
_ Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW orNWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below MHW
orNWL? X Yes No
If yes, Backfill over pipes and between
(1) Length of area to be filled 33'
(2) Width of area to be filled 50'
(3) Purpose of fill Backfrll over new nines and
between
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _Other Wetlands
If yes, No
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
Q) Purposeoffill
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
will be left and the pipes will be placed
between them.
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW orNWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert 49'6"
g. Width of proposed culvert 3Q, 9' 1"x 6'6" with
headwalls
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW orNWL 2'
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW orNWL?
X_Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 33,
(2) Width of area to be excavated 50'
(3) Depth of area to be excavated 2'
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 122 cu. vds.
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
,Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
Ifyes, Open Water
(1) Length of area to be excavated 33'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 50'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 122 cu. vds.
ji "'.1 s zcol -
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culven
require
any ighgro excavation?_.._'
X Yes No
If yes, Removal of bridge
(1) Length of area to be excavated 36'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 30'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 80 cu. Yds.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Temporary spoil area is existing road bed
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
20' x 20'
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes _ No
(5) Does thedisposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
_ Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW orNWL? _Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below MHW
orNWL? X Yes_ No
If yes, Backfill over pipes and between
(1) Length of area to be filled 33'
(2) Width of area to be filled 50'
(3) Purpose of fill Backfill over new pipes and
between
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _Other Wetlands
If yes, No
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? _Yes X No
If yes, .
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
_ Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? —Yes X No
If yes, explainin detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
_ Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work channels?
_ Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Silt fence
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic dredge)?
Tvpical Bridge construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
__Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
or
Signature
Date
f'
2001
Revised 03195

ZI �� • � �ww
u
31
rl .. ltlLrvjo �s L A C E S 0 N
W A M P J 26
L IJ JlJI l � IIIi. 1hi
a m 249 F1l! ,LQ \ L 178 m 3.. 129
i y 246 lo�°' .
w
a Ord a O.id4 2
91 i SeCI 1ZI1 1�1 ,Ili
rl, F322
^� $
3R1UFot2T Cor,UT
--
1 •� v UXPaTlo,,:0.4 Ms.
{ F321 SCTE.SR.Nc6R
aoe
15 � r 1 �' �{ 19
.. M...r. P18 ^rs ISLt ie IL1
Fw—\�
H E A C H A M
All
A V A N N A I 6�- �t� v y-
191
16
. C49,
//o^""
I _�-IMRACOASTAL
n.
c
R

tic
O. B. FLR. ST':.. 10+00.0
(PK NAIL_
ctur4a%- ±15Fca=_s
PoSSNHLE CHURCH NpZ eRT`(
T8, F
L400DS NFliL ICJ BAS�U
`l "-1 ' 26° FINE
�d A
- pa z �\
CV f
ryo,
y ac rr`7 ."10 � ijiGH TOPE
YARD
0 fn✓
R
,6„
x 6' I� Ky A A 5
,y
?w?I?FAzc� w;16 l�tx-A
NARRIEr R. Ross
/• , /2OH'Hu85 .PEC •ZOIip
PASTURE /
l - ry
•.,.
it
or fj
c.0• :' FLR. STA• 10y 35•�
(a rva�L)
P.S. STA. II _50.0(Na L>
1�C 5, �AUi�;�vra;.=�•;.0
3EAUFoR 7
9RIDGE. No. 12.7
=R No. 1�722
LocF;ION:0.41 J
CImoo` HoRI2.
1" = IO
AAA n� 1

lni
EXISTING TIMBER -BRIDGE
EXISTING WIDTH: 29' 7'
EXISTING LENGTH: 35'
SUPERSTRUCTURE: RC FLOOR/ TIMBER JOIST
SUBSTRUCTURE: TIMBER CAPS ON TIMBER PILES
HEIGHT CROWN TO BED: 8'
WATER DEPTH: 4'
SKEW: JOB DEGREES
EXISTING HEAD WALL
0
PROPOSED 3@ 9'-7" x 6'--6" X 49'-6" CAA
STRUCTURE: SIR. PLATE PIPE ARCH WITH
HEAD WALLS
1 i
i 1 �
1 r
� 1 �
1 I
I
9' RIP RAP
PROPOSED WIDTH: 30 9- 7' x 6- 6' x 49' 6' NWL --�
CORRUGATED ALUMINIUM STRUCTURAL
PLATE PIPE ARCH WITH HEAD WALLS
PROPOSED LENGTH: 49' 6'
HEIGHT CROWN TO BED: B' 12' MINIMUM BEDDING
WATER DEPTH:4'
SKEW: 105 DEGREES
1 361 x 301W x 2D = so ruelr YARns I
133'L x 5OW x 2'D = 122 CUBIC YARDS I
9' WING WALL
30 9'7' x 6'6' CAA
STR. PLATE PIPE ARC
1722
I
I 1
I I
• 1 I
' I 1
1 I
1 I
I
I tEXISTIS
BEAD WALL
3 e 9'7' x 6'6' CAA STR. PLATE PIPE ARCH
i CREEK

" SENDER:
a Complete Item t and/or 2 for additional services.
• • Complete Itema 3, 4a, and 4b.
g • Print your name and address m the reverse of ado form w Met we cart lai mt this
C card too
S a Attach
111I8 follll to the }rent of rile r11e1IpIaCe, Or ell the bad} If space dp6e n02
Lim • wdte •Return Receipt Requests?on the metlplece below the article number.
• The Return Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered and the date
.r+ delivered. -
3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article t
—7099 3
E Maggie Lee Clayton 4b. Service
8 230 S. Savannah Road [I Regtst Belhaven, NC 27810 ❑ Expresss
Z3
❑ Return Rl
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
iYa sA
5. R oeived By: (Print Name) ( 8. Address e's Ad
� and fee is paid)
5. Signature: (Addressee or Agent)
2 PS Farm 3811, December 1994 tout&e-oaas DDfr
08
r_for fee. a
7-0
5` 693
11
Certified
7 Insured
:1 COD m
0
•equested x
..,.I
..
o SENDER:
a a Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional serviros.
also wish to receive the
• e Complete Hems 3, 4a, and 4b, • .
following services (for an
1,9)ctre
t • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so MatWaon return fh4-'
fee):
card
a
to ou.
Is form to the cam of Me mallpiece, or on Me bath a apace_doav not
1. ❑ Addressee's Addressu
paeemerh
p
•=IlLRefum Race/pt Requested'on the mailplece below the article number;'
The Return
i `-•2 .❑ Restricted Delivery 0
• Receipt will slow to whom the article was delivered and the datd ;;: `,.
delivered. --- _:
3
.Consult,postmaster for fee. 8
A
. Artice Addressed to:
Harriet Ross
1206 Hubs Rec Road
Belhaven, NC 27810
5. Received By: (Print Name)
6. Sig 23uT: (Addressee or
E-
Ps Form 3811, December 1994
4a. Article Number $
1qq 3-;UQ bVQ-q L1103 Y656.r
4b. Service Type g
❑ Registered MCertfied
1
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured c
❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD n
7. Date of Deliv
8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested '
and fee is paid) m
m SENDER:
n7 •Complex items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
• •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
m 91 • Pdnt your nae and and
on the reverse of this form so that we can return Mla
m ca d to ou,
• Attach this form to Me front of the mallpiece, or m the bark ifspace does not
E pe""ib
�m a Write Tatum Receipt Requested -on the mallplbce below the article number.
• The Return Receipt will show fo whom the article was dermored and the date
delivered.
is 3. ArtlGe Addressed to:
E Jean S. Woolard
$ 3467 Davenport Fork Road
4 Creswell, NC 27928
5. Received By: (Pnnt Name)
6, Sign4ure: (Addressee OrAg nt
O1 PS Form Ul1, December 1994
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address g
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery `a
m
Consult postmaster for tee.
qo. pervloe�e
,t — �-
-'
❑ Registered
❑ Fxpress,Mail n r
❑ Retum 0e iptfor Mefdta
7. Date o Delivery__
8. Addre`ssee's'Address(�
and fee is paid)
t025sSeB'a-d22B D[Imac}ir I
J)
a
a
E
NCertified
❑ Insured
❑ COD
S
requested
c
n

rwrm t arouna
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
June 29, 2001
NCDOT c/o Jay Johnson
Division 2
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC, 27835
Dear Jay:
, , I I J K4
NCDENR
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application for State
approval for the replacement of bridge 127 in Beaufort County. It was received on June 8, 2001,
and appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a
decision is August 22, 2001. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time
is necessary to complete the. review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial
deadline stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those
circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an additional
letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at
the proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along the roadway
where it can be observed from the road. An example would be: nailing the notice card to a
telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way near the bridge. Failure to post this notice could
result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by
the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify
me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing
agencies.
Sincerely,
Bill Arrington,
D.O.T. Field Representative
WLA
Enclosure
cc: Charles Jones
Doug Huggett
Terry Moore, District Manager
Morehead City District \ 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza H
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcn-2.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50%RECYCLED / 10%POST CONSUMER PAPER

•\►1/I•�MiM�lM
•ITJnJm1=30==1a1-

`51
wab
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Lindo Tippett
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 31, 2001
Mr. Bill Arrington -
Coastal Management Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management �UU
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource`'`
151 — B Highway 24 Hestron Plaza
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 _�—
Dear Mr. Arrington,
Z
Please find enclosed a CAMA Major Permit Application on SR 17,3L Bridge #127 in
Beaufort County. The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace
an existing 35' timber bridge with 3 9'7"x 6'6"x 49'6" corrugated aluminum structural
plate arch pipes with headwalls on the same alignment. Headwalls are proposed to
minimize 20' of fill on slopes for the 70' length originally proposed. Please let me know
if there is additional information required '..
�G,r - eI µ' � V, n y r
`. L
air
Sincerely,
Jay Johnson
Division 2
Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. Neil Lassiter, Jr., P.E. Division Engineer NCDOT Div 2
Mr. Dwayne Alligood, P.E. Maintenance Engineer NCDOT Div.2
Mr. Thom Edgerton., Bridge Superintendant NCDOT Div.2
Division Two • P.O. Box 1587 • Greenville, N.C. 27835