NCDOT 100-04 Kitty Creek

Permit Class Permit Number
NEW 100-04
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Reso cElyz
and �t;;11 a
Coastal Resources Commission JUL 1 ¢
VerM t L 2004
for Morehead City DCM
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Authorizing development in Hyde County at Kitty Creek, Bridge No. 54 and Wallace
Canal, Bridge No. 52 on US 264 (TIP No. B-3348), as requested in the permittee's application dated 4/26/04
including the attached four (4) 1/2 size drawings dated 8/28/03 and two (2) dated 3/22/04.
This permit, issued on 719/04 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to tines, imprisonment or civu action; or may cause me permit to tie null and void.
B-3348, Bridge Replacements
1) In accordance with project commitments made within the Categorical Exclusion document dated August
2002, due to the presence of anadromous fish and the classification of Kitty Creek as a Primary Nursery
Area, no in -water work shall be conducted from March Vito September 30`s of any year without prior
approval of the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM), in consultation with the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) and the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF).
2) The petmittee shall implement NC DOT'S Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage,
except as modified in Condition No. 1 of this permit.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
No Expiration Date, pursuant to GS 136-44.7B
r§igned by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
J4;���. Jones, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signature of Permittee

5 g
ly" EN
a y r x
a.TF
t j
-
9�
E;t;c
F w
Ci1?i/e'
�

�W-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 2004
COASTAL f QANAGEMENT
ELIZAgET8 CITY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Division'of Coastal Management
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
LYNDO Tipp=
® SECRETARY
Apri129, 2004
JUN 012004 . '
Morehead City DCM
ATTENTION: Ms. Lynn Mathis
I DOT Coordinator
Dear Madam:
Subject: CAMA Major Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge No.
52 over Wallace Canal and Bridge No. 54 over Kitty Creek on US 264,
Hyde County. Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-264(9), State Project No.
8.1080601, TIP Project No. B-3348. Debit work Order 8.1080601, WBS,
Element 33006.1.1 for $400.00.
This resubmittal of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit application is in
response -to the deficiency letter dated March 9, 2004 and to the subsequent email from Lynn
Mathis dated March 24, 2004. Please find enclosed the CAMA major permit application, permit
drawings-, half-size plans;, and the green cards for the_above-mentioned project. The Categorical
Exclusion for this project was attached to the previously sent application dated February 23,
2004. Work Order 8.1080601 will be debited for $409.00 for the application of the subject
project. Bridge No. 52 over Wallace Canal and Bridge No. 54 over Kitty Creek (DEM Index 9
29-70-3, Class SC HQW) on US 264 in Hyde County will be replaced with new bridges
approximately 17 feet southeast of the existing bridges. The proposed structures for Bridge Nos.
52 and 54 will provide a 22-foot travel -way with seven -foot shoulders for a total clear structure
width of 36 feet. The bridge approach will have a 22-foot travel -way with six-foot shoulders of
which four feet would be paved for bicyclists. The design speed will be 55 mph. The preferred
alternative involves staged, simultaneous construction. This will allow one -lane, two-way traffic
during construction.
The slight shift to the southeast will allow the proper approach width and construction area
necessary to utilize staged construction and maintain traffic without a temporary on -site detour.
As a result of the shift, there will be 0.26 acres of permanent impacts to brackish marsh and 0.48
acres of fill in surface water.
A portion of a canal on the east side of the project will be filled in order to provide area for the
shifted roadway. To mitigate for this, NCDOT agreed to place three 24-inch pipes under an
adjacent road that leads to a North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission boat ramp. These
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANBPORTATON BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAND ENNRONMENTALANALYSIs 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBS17E: WWW..NCDOTORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGN NC 27699-1648

pipes will be buried one foot and re-establish a hydrological connection to either side of the road.
The permit drawings and plans currently show two 15-inch pipes. This will be corrected during
the construction phase of the project.
Kitty Creek is located in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
has assigned Kitty Creek a Stream Index Number of 29-70-3. DWQ has assigned a best usage
classification SC HQW. There is also Wallace Canal that crosses Bridge No. 52. 'The
unnamed tributaryhas the same best usage classification as Kitty Creek.
Class SC waters are defined as saltwaters protected for aquatic life propagation and survival,
wildlife, and secondary recreation. The HQW (1ligh,Quality Waters) are wafers which -are rated
as excellent based on biological and chemical/physical characteristics.
Bridge Demolition
_ Bridge -Demolition: Bridges Nos. 52 and 54 are two lane _structures with reinforced concrete caps
on timber piles supporting a reinforced concrete deck on timber joists. Bridge No. 52 is 34 feet
long with a 26.1-foot clear roadway width. Bridge No. 54 is 53 feet long with a 26.1-foot clear
roadway'width. Due to the structural components.. -of the bridges, there is the possibility of 41.6
cubic yards for Bridge No. 52 and 56.8 cubic yards being dropped into the "Waters of the United
States". All measures will be taken to avoid any temporary fill from entering Waters of the U.S.
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented.
As noted in the project's CE document, NCDOT will observe an in -stream construction
moratorium from March 1 to September 30.
Avoidance and Minimization
Due to the location of this project and the juxtaposition of adjacent wetlands and surface waters,
total avoidance of the surrounding marsh and surface water is not possible. NCDOT has taken
steps to minimize the impacts to this resource.
Bridges No. 52 and 54 are on a primary U. S. Route. Therefore, traffic flow must be maintained
throughout construction. - Road closure during construction is unfeasible due to the lack of a
suitable off -site detour. A temporary on -site detour that would have affected a brackish marsh
complex was rejected in favor of staged construction. Staged construction will allow one lane to
remain open to traffic during construction while minimizing necessary encroachment into the
surrounding wetlands and surface waters.
Bridge No. 54 has been lengthened from feet to 1 feet, allowing approximately-95 feet of
former causeway to be restored to wetland elevation. Additionally, the abandoned causeway
(from the 17-foot shift) will be restored to wetland elevation and replanted with native brackish
marsh plants.
Minimum width for the approaches and structure has been utilized.

k4
ENED
7004
JUN 0 1 " 0 7 2004
Summary of Impacts COASTAL
Morehead Cil ABETH CITYYENY
Wetlands: The total amount of wetland impacted is 0.26 acres from roadway fill un ercut.
Surface Waters: The amount of fill in surface waters is 0.46 acres and fill in a pond is 0.02 acres.
Buffer Impacts: The amount of impacts to Zone 1 is 1675 sq. ft. and the amount of impacts to
Zone 2 is 1000 sq. ft.
Mitigation: Due to the amount of wetland created by the 17-foot shift, NCDOT is not requesting
the EEP to provide mitigation. The shift in alignment to the southeast will allow 0.64 acres of
previously filled, coastal wetlands to be restored. The net gain in coastal wetlands for this
project is 0.38 acres.
-Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of declineeither due to
natural forces or their inability to co -exist with human activities. Federal law (under the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended) requires that any action
likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally protected be subject to review by the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Other species may receive additional
protection under separate state laws. Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are
protected under provisions of ESA § §7 and 9, as amended.
As of January 29, 2003, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists 13 federally protected_
species for Hyde County. Table 1 depicts these species. The biological conclusion of No Effect
remains valid.
Table 1. Federally Protected Species in Hyde County.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Bio. Conclusion
Leatherback sea turtle
Dermochelys coriacea
E
No Effect
Hawksbill sea turtle
Eretomochelys imbricata
E
No Effect
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
Lepidochelys kempii
E
No Effect
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
No Effect
Manatee
Trichecus manatus .
E
No Effect
Sensitive joint -vetch
Aeschynomene virginica
T
I No Effect
Seabeach amaranth
Amaranthus pumilus
T
No Effect
Loggerhead sea turtle
Caretta caretta
T
No Effect
Piping plover
Charadrius melodus
T
No Effect
Green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
T
No Effect
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
T
No Effect
American alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
T
No Effect
Red wolf
Canis rufus
EXP
N/A
Regulatory Approval
NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area Management Act
Major Development Permit. Copies of the green cards are attached. NCDOT has also applied

to
for the issuance of a United States Army Corps of Engineers'NWP13, a':401 Water Quality
Certification, and a Riparian Buffer Authorization under separate cover. '`•
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
httr)://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Permit. html.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Underwood at
[phone].
Sincerely, - -
�c
_ _Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director
llv�J Project Development and Environmental Analysis
w/ attachment: -
Mr. John-Hennessy,-DWQRaleigh ' '
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. John Sullivan, FHWA
Mr. D.R. Conner, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Clay Willis, DEO
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, P.E., Project Planning Engineer

P46671
Form DCM-MP-1
RECER
VEID
® ICATION MAY 0 7 2004
JUN 0 1 200To be completed by all applicants) COASTA' lk1ANAGEMENT
ELIZABErIi CITY
Morehead City ®CM b. City, town, Encommunity or landmark
1. APPLICANT hard
c. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: US 264
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address 1548 Mail Service Center
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27699-1548 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Phil Harris, PE LwE-I 3g c%
Address Same as above
City
Zip Day Phone
Fax
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? —Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, -sound, bay) Pamlico Sound
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridges with new ones with a
slight alignment change to the southeast
State b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New Work
c. Project name (if any) B-3348 Bridge # 52 &
Bridge # 54 over Kitty Creek on US 264
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name oflandowner(s), and/or
project name. -
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
c. Will the project -be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project. If
more space is needed, please attach additional pages.
To replace old structures.
a. County:
Revised 03195

pa66 A
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above ®or NWL
1.8' (existing bridge)
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
sand, clayey sand
e. Vegetation on tract brackish marsh, scattered pines,
small trees, and roadside grasses
f.. Man-made features now on tract -
existing bridges, roadway, and utilities.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Consult the local land use plan)
X Conservation _ Transitional
_ Developed _ Community_
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
N/A
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes _ No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? X Yes _ No
If yes, by whom? NCDOT
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National Register
listed or eligible property?
_ Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes —No
Coastal (marsh) X Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? ves
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, *surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges:) surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to- the completed application form, the
following items, must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the _
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.) --
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
OA Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.

J
Form DCM-MP-1
A Et
i E N
JUN I 1 2004
Morehead City DCM
*A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division --of ` Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant -
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See attached list
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
0 A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $400 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of -public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
PA&E 3
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my -knowledge. -
This is the 2(4y day off Pr: k t9_
Print NameI11
Signature
Landowne. or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4
Structures Information
X DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
_ DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 9n
COASTAL NIANAGt:V.',W
ELIZAEFTH C:M,
v,..4 -a naioc

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major _-
Permit,- Form DCM-MP-I.-- Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this -
proposed project._
Describe below -the purpose of proposed -excavation or 1. EXCAVATION
fillactivities. All values to be.given in feet. a. .-Amount of mate ial' toy be excavated from below - -'
00or NWL in cubic yards 97
Average Final _ _ .. -
Existing Project b. Type of material to be excavated existing road
Length: Width Depth Depth (pavement dirt)
Access
channel
(MI.W) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
-Rock
` breakwater
4M i n
Other wz+i&Ris
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
r
� tq fit.
lbft.
lUe %hi 63,A4rs
C. _
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands.' (marsh),- submerged aquatic vegetation _
(SAVs) or other wetlands? X Yes _ No
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards_1381 700
bridge & 681 to restore wetlands
2. DISPOSAL.OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL -
a. I ocationof disposal area to be determined by
contractor -
b: Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to -disposal area?
_ Yes X No
If no; attach a letter granting permission from the
owner:
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? —Yes —No IVI

F04WNWIA
V9
JUN 01 2004
Pi S
Morehead City DCM
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? If yes,
Yes X No (1)
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
_ _ Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION N/A
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
-- Bulkhead - Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be -placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes _ _ No
(2)
(3)
MAY 0 7 2004
COASTAL NANAGEMENT
Amount of m i&$FffHlJ%Tp1aced in. the
water_____
Dimensions of fill area
see Hermit application
Purpose of fill Proposed roadway,
bridges
b.- Will fill material be -placed in coastal -wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes, .
(1) Dimensions of fill area See' M S
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
NCDOT High Ouality Erosion Control Methods
Will be used
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard heavy highway construction equipment
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
5, A ,,,,.),
ApplLc,ant r Project Name
Signature
17-
Date

Form DCM-MP-5
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes x No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
(�or NWL? x Yes __ No,
If yes,
-(1) Length of area to be filled 1385 ft.
(2) "Width of area to be filled : 20 ft.
(3) Purpose of fill To restore coastal wetlands
-the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
--result .-in- any fill. (other than ,excavated_ material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
"z_' Coastal Wetlands SAVs Other
Wetlands If yes, - --
(1) Length.of area to be filled 719 ft.
-(2) Width of area to be filled 16.ft„
(3) , Purpose of fill Roadway fill
Will the placement o_ f.the proposed bridge or culvert,
result in any fill. (other, than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? x Yes No
If yes,.
(1) Length of area to be filled 2130 ft.
(2) Width of area to be filled 56 ft.
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes _ _ No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _ _ Yes
If yes, explain in detail_____
[a
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail _ _ _ _ _ _
d. Wili the proposed project require any work
='^ channels? _ _ Yes x No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT High Oual�
Waters Erosion Control Methods will be used
f. What type -of -construction equipment will be used -
(for . example, dragiine, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Heavy highway construction equipment
g. Will wetlands -be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? - _ Yes -- x --No
If yes, explain steps that .will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. __1,
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail
Ap licant or Project Name
Pe, ? 4_--- S
Si
�ze(eq
Date

Form bCM-MP-5
9
BRIDGES X
CULVERTS
jUN 012004
Morehead Pity DCM
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP=1.Be. sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES .
a. Public X Private _
b. Type of bridge (constriction -material]
Concrete prestressed girder
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge _
Wallace Canal- Bridge # 52
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW- or
+1- 6.0 feet
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
x
Yes No
If yes,
(1)
Length of existing bridge 34-ft. _ -
(2)
Width of existing bridge 29.4 ft.
(3)
Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge +/- 2.0 ft.
(4)
Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
All the existing bridges will beremovedand
replaced with new bridges -
f.
Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes x No
If Yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert-_---
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the M11WorNWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) -----
MAY 0 7 2004
g. Length. of proposed bridge 50 ft.
h.. Width of proposed bridge 36 ft. -
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands _
2-3 ft.
j. _Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
__Yes x--No
If yes, explain -----
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
+/- 3 ft.
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing- or increasing the existing navigable
opening? x Yes - No
If yes, explain Navigable otening will be increased. `--
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? _ _ Yes x No
If yes, explain___-_
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval? % A
__Yes __No `N
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-M -5
l A&E to
2. CULVERTS �St,'alcirr 3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Wat3 bodyin which;�nnllvert is to be placed' a•
--- DA ��rk ��ur}G ro rt� t!tiluAAM PI ({
b. Number of culverts proposed______,?
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)-
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? - _-
_ Yes No ` -
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge __ _ b. Will -the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
(2). Width of existing bridge .... require any excavation within: -
(3) Navigation clearance" underneath. existing x Coastal WetlandsSAVs __ Other
bridge ----- A /A Wetlands
- (4)-Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be If yes, --- --- - ------------
removed? (Explain) 6 (1) Length of area to be excavated 400'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 25''
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 2223
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert _
(2) Width of -existing culvert ___ A
(3) Height of the top" of the existin Culp-rt above
the MEW or NWL _ -
(4) Will all, or a part of, the e�tt' ting culvert be
removed? (Explain)
tlli?
7
f. Length of proposed culvert_____
g. Width of proposed culvert_____
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHWorNWL {t-Utr
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
_� Yes _� No
If yes, explain LVy l l!-?i �t
lb RP6t q. j Ctn%J'A( MTLAtJ05
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes __K No
If yes, explain
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert ,
require any excavation below the�or NWL?
x Yes _ _ No
If yes,
(l)—L-ength-of-area-to-be-excavated-700'- - -
(2) Width of area to be.excavated 33'
(3) Depth -of area to be excavated" 7 ' -
(4) -Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
- -yards 5988 -
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge .or culvert
require any highground excavation?
x Yes _ _ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 157 ft.
(2) Width of area to be excavated . 40 ft.
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 700
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation; please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
To be determined by contractor
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes x No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ _ Yes x No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes x No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2) .
above._____
d

Form DCM-MP-5
R
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the NIHW or NWL? __ Yes x No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above ._____
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
(&�or NWL? x Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 1385 ft.
(2) Width of area to be filled 20 ft.
(3) Purpose of fill To restore coastal wetlands
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
x Coastal Wetlands SAVs -_ Other
Wetlands If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 719 ft.
(2) Width of area to be filled 1'6 ft.
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill - see sheet 5 of
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above)- to be placed on
highground? x Yes _ —No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 2130 ft.
(2) Width of area to be filled 56 ft,
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
x Yes —No
If yes, explain in detail
.26 acres of on -site wetland restoration.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? --Yes --No
If yes, explain in detail _ _ _
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail _____
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? _ _ Yes x No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT High Oualitv
Waters Erosion Control Methods will be used
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Heavy highway construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ _ Yes x No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts......
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
_ _ Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail _ _ _ _ _
V yM ll 5. 14-�-'V✓a S 1`
AgpliRant or'Froject Name
11462FA
Date .ItJN 012004
OrM
1
WlAY 0 7 709"
COAEL ZABETH CITY
-1 -

p�tls� tz
NORTH CAROLINA
National Wildlife Refuge
LAKE
NIATTAMUSKEET
o .. _a
Lake Landing
m
�11111101111111111111M�- -II bbl,
F�Mft���
P A_M L IC O S O U IV D
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY-
ICINITY HYDE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1080601 (B-3348)
MAPS REPLACE BRG'62, BRG"U OVER
WALLACE CANAL AND KITTY CREEK
ON US 264
SHEET 0 OF REV.03f16/'04

Y
s
y.
MIN PROJECTS -
3348
Ll
• • dW.
• °, • • Engel
a • • ♦ • �.. —•. xr r;::�-.w�"' - •: �y:,sa}�s.rtire �-'t
• .,4� � • • O •♦•1 : t +••l •+�-. t!i�+.Lf_.. �A .�`.F,'yJ.da'P' :T+r�4 ..f>r«' �•!;-Gy�-'rbr����, f
•• ,� •� • I�C� w rl' xr
! L
•
s • +
•
'e:;a.;`; "'/nq�' �e,r:' -far., .. i•. ': � _
JUN I 1 2004
1
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HYDE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1080601 (B-3348)
REPLACE BRGR52,BRGA54 OVER
ALLACE CANAL AND KITTY CREEK
ON US 264
QQA5IALNIANAGEMEN I REV.03l15®04I
[I_IZABETH CITY

'WETLAND LEGEND
-WLB
WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
CL
WETLAND
PROPOSED BOX
CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN
uu
®
WETLAND
PROPOSED PIPE
CULVERT
12'-48'
FILL IN
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
PIPES
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
54'PIPES
_
& ABOVE
FILL
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
SINGLE TREE
®DENOTES
TEMPORARY
-
FILL IN WETLAND
WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
®
IN WETLAND
- DRAINAGE INLET
®DENOTES
TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER . -
ROOTWAD
DENOTES MECHANIZED
���
-CLEARING
-�
FLOW DIRECTION
RIP RAP
TB
'�-
TOP OF BANK
- WE
EDGE OF WATER
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
9
OR PARCEL NUMBER
- - C- -
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
IF AVAILABLE
- - -F -
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
❑ _ PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
-G-
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- - PL -
PROPERTY LINE
DITCH
-TOE-
TEMP. DRAINAGE
SWALE
EASEMENT
- PDE -
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- •
EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- •
EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- -� - -
- WATER SURFACE
X X X
X X
LIVE STAKES
X
NCDOT
BOULDER
2�
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- - -
CORE FIBER ROLLS
HYDE COUNTY
PROJECT-8.1080601 B-SU&
REPLACE BRGA52,BRGA54 OVER
WALLACE CANAL AND KITTY CREE
ON US 264
N
15104

Structure
SizelType
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HYDE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1080601 ( B-3348 )
ti

MEMORANDUM
TO: Jaye Poole, Personnel Officer
FROM: Lynn Mathis, DOT Project Coordinator/ Field Representative
SUBJECT: Debit to NCDOT's Account for a CAMA Permit or Permit Application Fee
DATE: May 18, 2004
Please debit DOT's account in the amount of $475.00 for the following
CAMA permit request:
Project: Bridges No. 54 and No. 52, over Wallace Canal and Kitty Creek, on US 264
State Project No. 8.1080601, TIP Project No. B-3348
Pe►mit.application for the replacement of two bridges Engelhard, in Hyde County.
The proposed work will -involve the excavation and filling of more than one acre of
wetlands and water.
TIP No. N/A
WSB Element No. 33006.1.1
General Permit No. N/A
Minor Permit Application Fee - N/A
Major Permit Application Yes
Please let me know if you need more information.
Thank you,
Lynn Mathis

See Shxf I -A For Index of Steels
STATE (OF NORTH H[ CAROILINA E32594.2.1
-3348DIVISION OlF HIGH WAYS RECEIVE® P.E.BRSiP-264 9 P.E.BRSTP-264 9 IWJ UTIL
MAY 0 7 2004 BR5R-264 (261 CONSTRUCTION
HYDECO U11 tT Y COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELI.ZA13ETH CITY
LOCATION. • BRIDGE No. 52 OVER WALLACE CANAL AND
BRIDGE No. 54 -OVER KITTY CREEK ON -
US 264 EAST OF ENGEUURD
TYPE. OF WORK. GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, GUARDRAIL,
STRUCTURES, TEMPORARY SIGNALS - — 09 s -
BEGIN TIP_ PROJECT -8-3348 - _ - _ - END TIP PROJECT B-3348.. -
L--POTStc.10#00 - =- . - _" - - - -- _ _.. - -L- POT_Sto..3/t2959
" _ -5 -
_.7-
IUD- -
__
US 269
I�
_
0 12004 - - -
I 1 -
.._ Morehead, ity DGM
-
1 _
W
-- PRELIMINARY PLANS gggg - ' m nar ua ran mxsmvrnmx
THIS PROJECT -IS -NEAR THE -CITY LIMITS OF ENGELHARD -- - "" - g --UETHOD:OF CLEARING - - I1 • • - - - -
-ys
"GRAPHIC SCtILES DESIGN -DATA PROJECT LSIVGTS - Prepared In fts Ornw d, ~:" - S A2SSOP NORTH MOX NA
_ _ DIVISION OF- HIGHWAYS
1TYDRA CS EmGI80I8R
50 25 4 50 100 ADT 2002 = 1060 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-3348 MILES Igoe Baca Rid,. D.., NC, 27610
All I ADT 20U = 1400 VPD LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-3348 = MILES B„�I,m1R0 SPRCBR L14d�5
PLANS
50 25 Q 50 140
DHV = 12 %
D = 60 %
T = 3 % '
V = 55 MPH
TTST. 2 % DUAL 1 %
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-3348 = 0.403 MILES
RIGHT OF WAY !DATE:
FEBRUARY 7,2003
JAMES A. $PEER. P.E.
rs
rs
etGn"2p°8`
rBWma' m�sa�B
JOHN C. L4NSFORD, P.E.
WAY
ROADWAY DESIGN
rim
FEDERAL RIGHWDAY ADMWSMU770A
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 t0 20-
LB7I7NG DA23::
JU11'R 15, 2044
rsafecr mecrav �a+arrrrm
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
rs
aronuuBe, - -
wraorm
nmsmn •^••�•^-�me ma

PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Ci
PROP. APPROX. 11A" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 89.15A,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 140 LBS.. PER S0. YD.
- PROP. APPROX. 2St." ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.SA,
C2
AT AN -AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER S0. YD. IN EAOH_OF TWO
LAYERS. - - .
PROP. VAR-._ DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 69.EA, _
_ C3
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER. 60. YD. PER I" •DEPTH. TO
.AT
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 1 "-IN DEPTH. -
E1
PROP APPROX 312" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25:OB,.•
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 399 LBS.PER SG. YD.' •i
PROP VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 825.OB
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S0. YD. PER 1" DEPTH.'T6
E2 -
BE PLACED -IN -LAYERS NOT LESS -THAN 3" IN DEPTH' OR GREATER `
THAN-S%o IN DEPTH. - - -
EJ
PROP. S" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
T
EARTH MATERIAL. --
V
EXISTING' PAVEMENT. - _--- --_. -
Ifs
VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (BEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAIL)
XXX
VARIABLE. _ --
- _ .SEE CROSS SECNONS
BID. 11+99 to 17+80 -1-
Sto. 18+80 to 21+93 -L- _
- - - - Sta: 23+79 to 28+20 4- - -
Sto.10+20 to 11+51
_Detail of Undercut Excavation-
Ck EXISTING CL SURVEY
VARLABLE
Gl E2" C3 C3; GRADE n
���_
r 3° U U �MI
MIN. MIN'
Detail Showing Method Of Wedging
NOTE: ALL SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
ExIST. —L—
B, 1-9' 11'
-- GIL
4' O' PO
Cq:� -
s
C ._
EN aRO1EGT WERCE NO. RN NO.
B-3346 2-A
DWAAOYNpyD0 IIGN rA�DESIGN
ROA�IN
®{G�
r,.;noaHgv;.:w§sxou:;co�mapPrw
-MAY 0 7 2004
.)ASTALI0ANAGEMEP!Y
f:117A13ETH CITY-
_
6'
- P.S. OVAR.lT + ... VAR
O 7
Var. 01- + _ USE TYPICAL SECTION NO:
-to- C1 C1 -L- Sta. 10+00.00 TO BEG. BRIDGE No. 52
-L- END BRIDGE No. 52 TO BEG. BRIDGE No. 54
02 .02 •Oz C2 •0? •OB _L_ END -BRIDGE No.55 TO Sta.31+29.54_ _
GUARDRAIL
T
E1
6" U EI HS
GRADE TO THIS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. -1 =
Y - —
B' - VAR..11, -- VAR.11•_
GRADE
0. _ POINT
E1 C2 Cl C7
02.-
_- SFFIle,a., _ _
� Ceq� s 2.1
r- _
7- N-
L
GRAIDE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION - NO. 2
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
-Y- Sta.10+11.221 TO Sta•11+97.35
• WITH GUARDRAIL

Cl
PROP. 1.26" S9.SA
J
PROP. 9" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
C2
PROP. 2.5" S9.6A
T
EARTH MATERIAL
C3
VARIABLE DEPTH S9.6A
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT
E1
PROP. 3.5" 825.08
W
ASPHALT WEDGING
tE2--VARIABLE
DEPTH-B25.OB - -
- -- - ---
LIVED
MAY 0 7 2004
COASTALNIANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
- - - - -Y1—
- 4' -
GRADE
= POINT
.02
as
m AA
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
—DR-
2'
USE. TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
-YI- Sta.10+11.288 TO Sta.12+34.53 -
. 7'
• WITH GUARDRAIL
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
-DR- Sta.10+13.00 TO Stu. 11+40.00
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
JUN 01 2004
Moro -head City DCM

DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LXALLIED a WIWE ASTEM IYVEG)REO FOR THIS IHRFCT
LS BASED By THE STATE PURE G[pviws ESTAG.LvrED I7
AM FOR ARN MENT •a1fIRELL-
WITH MAD 83 STATE PLATE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING, 6942=8/fftl EtSTIM 2893825.5992<ftl
THE NERAGE L30W GRID FACTOR USED BY THTs PowELT
D.'u0N0 TO GRID) Is a9)9�
YHE Or LAIC37G GRID BEARING ATO LOCALIZED NARIAWTAL
MAD DISTANCE FIX UTW ELL- TO -L- SAL 10.00W IS
N 53'54'48.87'E 1917.57'
All LINEAR DlVEWIAL�ISI N DISTANCES
EWCL DSE ISSkW0
SKETCH OF
SR 1315
4 -y 501 700
1050 400
j
US _264 I400
-L- TRAFFIC
IN RELATION TO BRIDGE WIDTH
Y� *
" �4.-,
w
'D E PROJ CT Na.B- 48
Sto. I +LtOAO
*
E.IKt. R/W
to ..
_ Ls02iNM0
h.1ST. -W
z 9t. N
RM-9 R/R BFKE iN O-PINE Exl
ELEV.=4A3' s
59.9-RT OF -BL- 4.82.7 _
DETAIL_'B' - -
ROCK EADAWWENT DETAIL--
- vsuccr x.rtmu nTa F.N=�esw sn
N,ss"iiw rnsiom _ _
_ \ —g!SEL-LG _.
� m' -cuss ro wr
-
4,y¢yn Was.ae ,aw
FROM STA. 10+70 TO 11+30 -Y- LT.
2002 ADT
2025 ADT
<100 650
L I _900 US 264
DIAGRAM., -L
R/W REVISION 3116103 JCL
EXPANDED TEMP .CONST.EASEMENT
ON PARCEL 4 -DR-
PI SIC 9+0884
PI Sic 10+4399
A- 87'2F28$(LT)
G= 68'05'2W(RT)
D 298
D 97 9' 09.4'
�W35'
=
T 4775'
T = 29D2'
R = 50.00'
R = 30L0'
SE = NC
SE = NC
PI SIC 12+9586 P1 SIo 16+3771
o- 507121J'(RT) 6- 1`21'275(LT)
NATHAN PABL -G®BS D = Fa 453' D = 0.34' 225'
No DEED Faso L = 447,03' L = 23695'
*
- - T .= 22356' T = 118.48'
R - 5DDOD0' R = IODOODO'
O
SE - OX SE y NC
z W RO - 78' PRC SAC. 1!
- - z
_L
.70.00 -L-
Y
E*IN1-RN. I.
OW
DETAIL 'A'
ROCK EMBANKMENT
,pi M ICII(,
nWF rsN=
WAss nON nW0
-L-
,,,5��
Im wr !a
ra,..AN
iaAss= rrN,r i TJSRC c.N.L
DETLL SNONING RACEMENT OF ROCK EL AWMENT FOR
FROM STA. 13+25 TO 17+50 -L- RT.
- PC SYa 1047220 -L-
*
I
*
- :y-
PI Stu 9+23
1755, (1
..p=
D-800' d
Y
L - 1739C
' T 87.40' "
* z R = 71r2D;Y I .la 7 -T-
SE = NC E*1 t. R/W
dl
.AO 0 -
I` 3ao0 Ao.
ROCK EHD T
A
M POND S
DETAR B
c^s.T
6"C
NOTE. Place Inverts of 'ecullizer pipes
'
at a maximum elevation of
* I.00'r On a 0.00% grade, _
T5'
*
O
and a minimum 0
* cover over pipe. PC STD
*
C.OLBEBT GIBBS
-
# SPECIAL SHOP CURVED
NO DEED FOIND
_.
ANCHOR UNIT
*
* r7
* * * EA
Ste,
2yC - PROPERTY OWNERS*
9�C.p KEhNE7Ng -PNPPS WC
DB
74
RECEIVE®
MAY 0 7 ?^;.<,
COASTAL i'I A NAGEMA :
t""'1 j %Scot . tJY DOI
SZt z `Olt
m
PRELIMINRY PLANS
m Nm me C9mTA0.TON
NOTE:SEE SHEET N0.6 FOR -L- PROFILE
NOTENSEE SHEET Na7 FOR -Y- PROFILE
NOTE:SEE SHEET N067 FOR -YI- PROFILE
NOTE. -SEE SHEET Na7 FOR -DR- PROFILE
E HEET S-ITHRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
^ C. GI.BERT GIBBS
VA' ND DEED FOUR O
Sr 12+IOD7 -Y- _
r On
*
;110 +OODO -YI- =
sr IT+6.353 -L-
*
*
PUT SIM IU+OULV -uH-
POT S10. 19+50J3 -L-
*
zG FOR
.WETUYp$
R•M
ILU, '
I�
)1
IV
RC brCJ -DR-
20.00 -1-
Ci
C.11+3733 -OR 30.DO'
Eric CDnsrruCllm
• 0.00 -L-
Q
A5.00'®
00.00 t-
L00'.00.00' DORTHEA LONG OIRMR
* DBMM527
IT Sta. 11+50D0-DR-Pc-L"'o-B
* -PI Sla 11+8355 _
&= F--4P 599(Rr)
D - 5'4345S
L - 15184'
T - 76.07'
R - IDOODO'
SE - NC
*
GEORGE ABBREY LONG
PG-N,SL.s3-B
NO DEED FDIND
'
-YI
a I
I
6-10 GRID E N LIM 1 ' PME
v
320.8' PT F - LT 13 4.9
1
I I
I
I I i CRpd.W Fb+ is•FYEM RELP'Al MOX AN'IDdx S-.B
P3i
14
it
QLp�Lc(c ..
I;! p5`¢7/04

R1W REVISION 5116103 JCL
EXPANDED TEMP.CONST.EASEMENT
ON PARCEL 4 AND 7 RT.OF -L-
Ch`P rM aP PdVPMPM W GPI ArInM rn RP/Mr W111TH
DETAIL V
ROM E1BAKK Q mAl.
L9• seal n12wL an uo9in
[V53 n Dl fiQb
c.uum rn
J � I„ l,pyR a woim
Lf63YG C�.
ZZc'1 �`j
900
/ 67�0
PC S1a. 23+3996 -L--
Y *
. CLBERT IBB * •C&" BLYTME DXMS.ET AL
HO DEED FCY ..
OR OS. PD. 368
ERa State Pil
* y✓
BM NTDE 151 ROCK OCTAL
PDT S10.
' 9 I + Y SEE OETA4 'B'
.B4'LEF ,ELEvc 474 ' '(.\ Y
BBBB��� Of /
CLA
SEE ST UCTyyRE PL * ]
TO
M Sta. 27+5975 -L- +so.o0 2—
-L-
NOT& SEE SHEET 110.6 FOR -L- PROFILE
NOTE.S£E S- THRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
6
�3 VED
bWAY 0 i poc4
%0q�g -rAL A0gNAG
Cl ryelVi
Y
9E 1 9M.9L,V -* _
W
+18t5.1 R/N
�AO
FOR -Z
.y a •�ymu- ,E .aIdRORNL CMIAL PROP. ETWM 40.N9
kpl E "ego ESL _
F
E le -
i
— BNLfE 5 • .1 - a PY89J vu•4 xum'+'--' _ _
5Y- F d,C
CNO c51
U
00. -L- PROP. R/N, 45.00' i24'� -L ENlet. R/N
CLASS R� RAP 0. +59.75 ' ERI91. R/N -
+DO.00 -L- * TO ELEV. STRU 2' +75.0 -L• 00
Q E STRUL PLdNS OP. R/ 5.
PI Sta 25+4989 P/ Sid 28+9LR0 PL? p0c 27+�9.72
:z5.00 -L- DORTFIA LoxG 01" * 0= 124, IWILTJ 0- 3'0I'4L2'(RT)
D 0. D = f 08' 453' * 9.194' Rt.
=34228
De R.f5.32T.'S� L = 49.78' * L = 26425'
-B. a'D-B P 4 T = 20992' T 132.16' .
10D DO, R = 5.000DO'
M93111•E y RD = 7ff
PT S7a. 30+24QD -L- I /�
_ * 91i[N SIP610E EIEYa LI6' - - - -
NdLTER ENERETT FOWLER
•. OR IOLfG 691
WGN FITEP ELl64' Y
199Wk49E 41D1¢999 '
* GEORGE uRREY LONG �+ man W9TER 9Pa FWw- *
" 6P.O.W''R"�P5 Y 0 1 2004
NO DEED FOUMD w \ ' EXLELN 21924 - J U N
a\ Q521925-2371
Y
* P.NE✓ENT REW'.1L e E SW Morehead City ®CM