NCDOT 65-96 Core Creek

Permit Class
Permit Number
NEW
65-96
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vamit
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
, as requested in the permittee's application dated'1/4/96 including attached workman
This permit, issued on MAY 8. 1996 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Excavation and Fill
1) In order to protect juvenile shrimp and fin fish populations, no excavation or filling will be permitted
between April 1 and September 30 of any year without the prior approval of the Division of Coastal
Management, in consultation with the Division of Marine Fisheries.
2) No vegetated wetlands or open water areas will be excavated or filled.
3) All excavated materials shall be confined above the mean high water line and landward of vegetated
wetlands behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spill -over of solids into any
marsh or surrounding waters.
This pemtit_action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31.1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Roger N. Schecter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

N.C. Dept. Of Transportation Permit #65-96
Page 2 of 2
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4) The placement of riprap is limited to the high ground slopes beneath the proposed bridge.
5) All riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as, but not limited to,
granite or broken concrete.
6) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
7) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction must not visibly increase the amount
of suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
8) All disturbed areas shall be properly graded and provided a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within thirty days of project completion.
General
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized the proposed project under General Permit
No. 198200031 (COE Action Id. No. 199601519) which was issued on 4/4/96:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL/PROCESSING RECORD
A) APPLICANT: NC DOT COUNTY: Craven
LOCATION OF PROJECT. Bridge #129, on SR1245, near Cove City, over Core Creek
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: March 27, 1996
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached - NO To Be Forwarded - YES
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached -NO To Be Forwarded -YES 4111 6
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Tyndall DISTRICT OFFICE: Morehead
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW:
B) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED INRALEIGH: FEE REC'D:$
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: END OF NOTICE DATE:
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D: DEED REC'D:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: ON:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: 150 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE: STATE DUE DATE:
FEDERAL DUE DATE: FED. COMMENTS REC'D:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY DRAFT ON
AGENCY
DATE COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management Dist. Office
Div. of Community Assistance
Land Quality Section
Div. of Env. Management
State Property Office
Div. of Archives & History
Div. of Env. Health
Div. of Highways
Wildlife Resources commission
Div. of Water Resources
Div. of Marine Fisheries

.,r
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO April 4, 1996
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199601519 and General Permit No. 198200031.
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Through coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management, we have learned of your plans to replace NCDOT Bridge No. 129
over Core Creek, located on State Road 1245, near Cove City, Craven County,
North Carolina.
On January 1, 1992, we renewed General Permit No. 198200031, (copy
enclosed), that authorizes the placement of fill material associated with
the construction, repair, or replacement of bridges across navigable waters
and waters of the United States in North Carolina, including cofferdams,
abutments, foundation seals, piers, temporary construction and access fills,
approach fills, detour fills, and box culvert installation, as part of work
conducted by or in full compliance with the standards and specifications of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
Your proposed work is authorized if you can comply with all permit
conditions. Please read the enclosed permit to prevent an unintentional
violation of Federal law. As this Department of the Army general permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any other required approvals,
you should contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
If you have questions, please contact Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
. Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

-2-
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23705
Mr. Charles Jones
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Post Office Box 769
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

MEMORANDUM
TO: Doug Huggett
FROM: M. Ted Tyndall ff, *
SUBJECT: Field Recommendation and Conditions for the North Carolina Department of
Transportation's Major Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge #129
over Core Creek -- Craven County
DATE: April 26, 1996
I have reviewed the subject application in regards to 07H.0207 & 07H.0208 and have
determined that the proposed project is consistent with those rules. I have no objection to the
permit being issued with the following conditions:
1) The placement of rip rap is limited to the high ground slopes beneath the bridge.
2) All riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as, but
not limited to, granite or broken concrete. Materials such as tires, car bodies,
scrap metal, paper products, tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar
material, are not considered riprap.
3) No wetlands or open water will be excavated and/or filled.
4) In order to protect water quality, runoff from the construction must not visibly
increase the amount of suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
5) All disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion within thirty (30) working days of project
completion.
cc: Charles Jones
Raleigh Bland - COE, Washington

MEMORANDUM:
TO: John Parker
FROM: Kathy Vinson
SUBJECT: Consistency Determination, Major Permit Application, NC
DOT, Bridge #129, on SR 1245, near Cove City, over Core
Creek, Craven County
DATE: April 18, 1996
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace
the existing timber bridge on SR 1245, over Core Creek, near Cove
City, Craven County with a new concrete bridge.
AECs impacted by the work include Public Trust Areas. The waters of
Core Creek at the project site are classified as C Sw NSW.
I have reviewed this proposal for consistency with the 1993 Craven
County Land Use Plan (LUP) Update and offer the following comments.
The general area of the project is classified as Rural, while the
Public Trust Areas AEC impacted by the work is classified as
Conservation.
The Craven County LUP allows all uses permitted by 15A NCAC 7H in
conservation classified AECs, including Public Trust Areas (Pages
III-2 and III-3).
Applicable policies contained in the Plan include Resource
Production and Management Policies for Marine Resource Areas (Page
IV-8). These policies reiterate Craven County's support for the
minimum use standards for public trust areas as described in 15A
NCAC 7H. Policies regarding Commitment to State and Federal
Programs (Page, IV-11, Economic and Community Development Policies)
state support for the North Carolina Department of Transportation
road and bridge improvement programs.
Based on the above policies, this bridge replacement project
appears to be consistent with the 1993 Craven County Land Use Plan,
provided all state requirements can be satisfied.
CC: Preston Pate
Charles Jones
Ted Tyndall
Don Baumgardner

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A,
• •
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor r�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N F1
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 27, 1996
SUN JOURNAL
Legal Advertisement Section
P. O. Box 1149
New Bern, NC 28563
Re: Public Notice - NCDOT Bridge #129
Dear Sir:
Please publish the attached Notice in the Wednesday, April 3, 1996, issue of the SUN
JOURNAL.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original copy of the
published notice, and an original invoice to Kris Horton, Division of Coastal Management, P.
O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact me at our Morehead City office.
MTT
Enclosure
cc: John Parker
Kris Horton
Charles S. Jones
Sincerely,
J�'.Ca (/
M. Ted Tyndall
Field Representative
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources hereby gives public
notice as required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an
Area of Environmental concern as designated under the CAMA was received on March 27,
MITI
According to said application, the North Carolina Department of Transportation
proposes to replace the existing timber bridge on SR 1245, over Core Creek, near Cove City
with a new concrete bridge.
A copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at the office of M. Ted
Tyndall, Division of Coastal Management, located in the Division of Marine Fisheries
Building, Morehead City, N.C., [phone] during normal business hours.
Comments mailed to Roger N. Schecter, Director, Division of Coastal Management,
P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N. C., 27611, prior to April 23, 1996, will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time
of permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review and comment by the
public and state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be
provided upon written request.
PUBLISHED ON: Wednesday, April 3, 1996

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Craven County, Bridge #129 on SR 1245 near Cove City, over
Core Creek
Photo Index - 1989: N/A 1984: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,509,600 Y: 532,500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - December 19, 1995
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Revised Application Received - March 27, 1996
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A)
Local Land Use Plan - Craven County 1993 LUP
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C)
Water Dependent: Yes
(D)
Intended Use: Public Transportation
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
High Ground
1,110 fo
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1,110 ftz
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C Sw NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace an
existing bridge with a bridge.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE #129/CRAVEN COUNTY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
Bridge #129 is located on SR 1245 near Cove City, over Core Creek, in Craven
County. The Inland Waters of Core Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, is located
approximately 2 miles upstream of Pitchkettle Landing. At the project site, the creek
is approximately 110' wide and has an average daily flow of approximately 32 cfs.
Water depth is approximately -8' below NWL. The existing timber bridge is 116 feet
long by 19.4 feet wide. It has a navigational clearance of approximately 6.5 feet. A
wooded swamp borders the project site on the southern shore, while low lying yards
border the creek on the north shore. Core Creek is classified C Sw NSW.
Project Description
The applicant proposes to replace the existing timber bridge with a 135'-long by
24'-wide concrete bridge. The NCDOT proposes to construct the bridge using three
45' prestressed cored slabs. Since the proposed bridge is longer than the existing
bridge, approximately 1,110 ft2 of high ground will be excavated to facilitate
construction. Resultant spoil would be trucked off site to a high ground location.
Rock rip rap will be placed beneath the bridge to stabilize the shoreline.
Anticipated Impacts
The project as proposed would have negligible impact on the Public Trust Area
AEC. No excavation or filling below the NWL or in any wetlands is proposed. And
since only limited high ground excavation is proposed (approximately 125 yds3) there
should be minimal adverse effects by project -related sedimentation. The project would
have no adverse effect on navigation (The project would actually increase the clearance
by 0.2 feet).
M. Ted Tyndall - Morehead City - March 27, 1996

VIFORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Cove City
C.
Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner:
SR 1245
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation
d.
Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P. O. Box 25201
e.
Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC
river, creek sound, bay) Core Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3.
DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone]
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent:
a.
List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge with new bridge.
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
b.
Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Craven County
C.
Will the project be for public, private or
Replace Bridge No. 129
commercial use? Public Transportation
d.
Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Permit will be issued to name of tamlowner(s),
methods of construction and daily operations
and/orproject name.
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation. See cover letter for
details.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Craven
Revised 03/93

FORM DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WA
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. . Size of individual lot(s) N/A
�n�+,gAAgay
C. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
or NWL Elev. +/-8 in from USGS Ouad.
Drawings are on an assumed datum.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Mucky fine sandy loam and muckalee
sandy loam.
e. Vegetation on tract Upland vegetation,
wetland vegetation.
Man-made features now on tract 116' lone
timber and steel bridge
g: What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the Site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation _Transitional
Developed _ Community
X Rural _ Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
No zoning
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? _ Yes _ No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ifapphcable.)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? _ Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
effluent, "wash down", and residential
discharges.) Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

✓ Revised 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
* A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Phillip Wrenn Treadway
Address 157 Dover Road, Cove City. NC 28523
Phone
Name Gregory and Deborah Y. Riggs
Address 160 Dover Road, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
Name Blanche D. and Bonnie Brown
Address P. O. Box 191, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
(4th Adjacent Property Listed Below)
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
* A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03195
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to 'representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the --e day of 19
Print Name H. Fralluin Vick- P.E.
Signature _2
Landowner orAuthorizedAgent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
i�-\v
(4) Donald Earl Riggs.._..;� .;
9700 Old US Ili hwa � 0
g y ,
Cove City, NC 28523

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Concrete
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Core Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWT +/-9'
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 116 feet
(2) Width of existing bridge clear roadway=19.4'
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge +/-6.5 feet
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) The existing bridge
will be removed.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MEW or NWL
Revised 03/95
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 135 feet
h. Width of proposed bridge 24' clear roadway
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
+/- 6.7 feet
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
in. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.

Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential?
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
9
Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert.
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MIIW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Yes No
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation'within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
C. Will the placement of the proposed bridge. of culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated +/- 30'
(2) Width of area to be excavated +/- 37'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/- 125 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
High around, off site
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
To be determined during construction.
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHWorNWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
M
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Standard NCDOT
Erosion Control Methods.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical bridge and roadway
construction equipment.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on It.
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detai
r
�5
�e _
Revised 03/95 ��I'"e•''Yii LS
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail Rip rap to be placed on
slopes beneath bridge as directed by engineer.
NCDOT_ Craven County Bridge No. 129 Replacement
Applicant or Project Name
Signatur
� t��, /I
Date

i
L!
�` IP 1 ' l''�• I 11l1 11l1
\ $; to uta ull. 9
1 1 �F bwM , %i: •.. rrinra r La uy? °u. : uu r I]
i is Ilia
I " G 1 l .
H( IIN IIN :a r ^l•o. , 1 ivr.vK Ga«nr r:I,• Y' I Y ? `,1\^
Q pp ]
" -113
JIH .a 1 HN y t"� 1 .•r _R NI Jill
IN, 'IIN 'H• , IN v •''r fI;WrN ", \_
s. Tf
��• IHI NNN flit
11 IH.'i •
ItP IIN t I � 1I
t it... t I•Y'.I Q f i 7. • Y' i.:
• INI Illl• � ' 11., �, • Ir..
• wr r (,y is" a It
1
nnnn r '
uu Jtu 9
all
Is
IIV • IIN � .
t coa M, S '^? uu
. n'r u•t s n
lit,T. ... 4i J
Ila
JtIL • J IIl4 _>t 111L
v=A.i 37 ,'.a: Had
— -- --
CRAVEN COUNTY
NORTH CAROLIN,o; ° SCALE anus
�'�='�ij tc9-•" H' it Staltlai Il 1.N,00.P^ t^;
+ li, l t t �1 t111CP rinv...•
p ,I 1� cot 1.1 lei-
�• _ � Olds Oro � r GullPn `, ,17 is I7 \alaNiGN, ra„4
• .^ii.� t • '4.Yr I,jon , , ' \ Le.ue 1 _I, ..
A
?.�.. ! q. Intln•H Otvlm n,en 5 •i,af[DIXa Awas Nall 1:
.`.; :;�.. :' :.�.. �..`•'.i• I UGtnP tl`• , 11 If E Im'ell 1 Ca Ian
`n...:1',V .' Gu, • _. \� �• a 1 �' i NNIT^III
• 'TW,lar� \J f - 1 i Inston)
S4 c-.r.r� tyr _�� Um« t ,4nN v `II l[.0
So Cane
', •::-<5n j-\.a. _. -•. . ... , �lSa'^ ^1(�nr-' 1 �1�'�0.. tt°a \n MuiDel
_ ,,.� '•. fS 1 {N`-\ .1 rt Cort Glf 6tr°ao rar
.. r. �.•p C. .. ti .:::�r: a 57 ,Da �((
•r �n-.r� ..: c S 1 I t N 0 I itl- ftl '(Ilrman r ° A Au 1
•1 .o,r• t - L E
o- ,� \tV1C.rIXl U dnlmp A M L
�; • \ 1 pt•M 1•A) /!y /A
`r.rlll;
I C . I el 1 IP �,• \ V V�
-1•.a 1 i Ruunl
' �,r: ;�t., . ' ♦1 ,rR.e}� Kane[,Y I Pml Nil/ I / ♦ 1 S •..� R\ �J� 1
Pr ... "N 1 1 \\ ,.,.
�`?- '• yr la•,: ''.•� � J •s--?q N Pw°cEcdN, Rn«4,1t �?p
�•. ��i}rs `' _ .n"1:�J: /• Pcl?°
tl G.nlurLaa:-•,j; I ! \ =q N
I't :_i-.. ••'..F�, t u p t 1 �` ._?-� Y CROAYAN GotHn Rbti i�4
- < -.M1 A r i• %k + to !• .� _ � � � •NOF
I i;t'tl tall I_Kenmsr IN Pollus ! ��\ _-Li -w'nil li Ldr 1••yyy'•'v' '�/ �U\`s /1('
Ndl t ATIONAL Lra~ T S SI' Mi
7 T' v ., •i•��` N «At^dl ♦ rilutOwa � fv•._ '�I 4nsnNt NLn � -•
NO} Tv H°,:.N.C. DCKT . OF TRANS
DIVISION OF
o s o HIGHWAYS
_..
CRAVEN COUNTY
I .a Io QD w eD a[ EfRIDGE N0. 129 ON
_. 1245 OVER
1
+IRE CRl-.'EK
sultwMILES atwlEQUALS Arrlro:urnts_ MAR
•. 3
i+l lj(-NUARY 1.99l,

,`,yF�, 3��5 PB BRsoGE
CIO
PEG. $Lp
R`p1F1 ��tPOW�yIo*oo P.EG. Fxx r, al:c, rL, y G° N .
HZ�US R RoAp C? K. N Au TN
7
j5� GLT-I, 2g523 `` -� LtJ
cr
Td � A \
I lioo
x�o.—_z;n �1 VA 1
nzz H:><� PP' b0
M c:Mr- 0 < . 9�
�:o \
INDTcr�n
0Asnzom 1 _ W ILFf10-`
I n z z ghGb Np �X1SS, �fLf�; 'Fl-. i
o 1 r vH=o
IOW oL�1
n- �- L 2N.4�'" R51
z t 1` _ C P K
o =a L-� NY.R
z v z A?Xt ""' M �EoAO ' � G. 3 SCALE. ; I"=50'FloR2Z.
�, .Loci �or� 1o`ao G L�Sy, �$51 ,:..

v;
BLANCHE EONNIz -8ROvM
Covr CaYv N.G, t�
JVJAtAP
eD
0%�oAY°$ LTNE. Ts Epp `� 1
ril
61 — —
/.
— a o C1�
IV
h 48" yll"b 1 DA K /
2POT�M;o
m.z;u *4D<C-)
.mCmy,0< +r
-i D N o m e DDNALD LAR L
`a-< T cP m z o171 0 9700 OLD 0,5.70
�o r rm--. o.o o c i COVE Cz7Y, /�•Cr.
Tl JT<r CO•
i W m z m 28S? 3
H
z f i( I SC AL I"=50' P(
P z 12to0 MOO •14+00

E
g
m
u
-l'sr,V I Nast Iry B&SE Oa
48" AILta♦.1 8Au 33, ExISTIr♦fC, AZEA=116o Sa.FT.
Rz: Of STA. lg+10 PQOPOSED Am=1240sa. Fr.
ELEV. = .500.00
� xrsrrnte,�Paovose� �
tJC•,, Lr.,�J✓J• OH4i * ELEY• 94f�•I---.
W.S. � 495.fo iio-2�1.9:
�.YusnkC, Bqw., INFO.: i5im I.12A
SQA;►s S-r EEL 1`Ci BRMS
rRIAR. DVr-VLF PILES * NSVT:.
0 A L = 11In, 0` cL. Rowy. ° IRA
mgQv�ae�oz
Nve— DAm FLOW = 3Z CFS
FILL IN WETL0,M0S= DONE
3 FYLL IN WATERS = NONE
Mop
' ® I%ENfirHS N)4HUR0Vnp EXLAVATIOn
1
1
� LV
f i•
8to0j I G +00 to+co
Sn, lO+(./0�
3 ® US' PRE5�4• W2ED SLAS
I" = 50' Nnai-a.
" - 1a'

Iul
1500
:r
inc.,�o�m�oz
mzm -D<
mzn 0<+ i.
mCmi-`o<M`
I-iD NOm W
jCXtn om
�orm000- -q
m zm
i zrr- o
1 N �2:
H
n-Z
z
D z
-G U.
i
I I
11+50 1 *Z 00
•SECTi1DN -A-A
.LQ
PenPLtEO CL
GRF1Dk.
)O ice'
�ExsS-rxribf
QNG n.T
13+00 lytoo
SECT -TON 6-8
PROPOSED
GRROE
i
10
5001
y90
V:
SCALE:
I rr_ SD '141 Ri 2.
I'�= IO'VFRT.

c
C.
`c
a
C
F
P 576 551 765
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use
for International Mail See reverse
M&
Ap"n-F(RAm
p S
ZIP C
e 285a 3
Postage
$
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
Realm Receipt S howig to Whom,
Date, &Addressees Addes
TOTAL Postage & Fees
$
a
P,apndc , gfi
l(�J,Y�M n
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
LLllen,
a
. ��
O
C da 5 2
o -C�.)
FFee
$
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
Rehm Recept%0Wq toWMm,
Oak. &Addressee's Adders
TOTAL Postage & Fees
$
7--L,
�r .# Imo/
P 576 551 764
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Dn not usa fnr Intomatinnal Mail /Sea reversal
nt'o l
(Qh PiCICIS
sS et N i
ce, e &ZIP It 2815,25
�f�'
Postage
$
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
,
Rehm Rece',ntSbawigto Whom,
Date, & Addressee's Address
TOTAL Postage & Fees
Is
Postmark or Daze
Cram, �jr.# lam
P 576 551 766
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
'No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Cued Fee
Spatial Delivery Fee
fleseicted Delivery Fee
N
� Relum Receipt Showin<
co TOTAL Postage & Fees
Date
€ P
'ark
kor
�,�

0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
�p
MAR 0 8 "'-)930
lJUL5� ai LXi: i�r_V
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
March 1 1996
Mr. Charles Jones
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
P. O. Box 769
3441 Arendell Street
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Dear Mr. Jones;
GARLAND B. GARRETr JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: Craven County, Replacement of Bridge No. 129 on SR 1245 over Core
Creek. State Project No. 5.1751.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace Bridge No 129
over Core Creek on SR 1245 near Cove City in Craven County. The existing two-lane
bridge 116 feet long and 19.4 feet wide will be replaced with a concrete bridge 135 feet
long and 24 feet wide. This bridge replacement will take place on existing alignment and
during construction local traffic will be detoured along existing roadways.
The new structure is longer than the existing bridge (see Sheet 4 of 5). To facilitate the
longer structure the North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to excavate a
small amount of material (125 C.Y.) above the Normal Water Level (NWL). There will
be no excavation or fill below NWL or in wetlands. The shoreline will be stabilized by the
placement of rip -rap on slopes beneath the bridge.
The elevation of the new structure will be higher ( 0.2 ft.) than the existing bridge. The
proposed bridge will not affect existing water flow and will not affect existing navigation
potential.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting that the proposed work be
authorized under the appropriate Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit.
Enclosed is a permit application for a CAMA Major Development Permit including permit
drawings and a copy of the fee application check for $250.00.
By copy of this letter, we are also requesting issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification
from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Management.
92

2
We do not anticipate requesting an individual permit from the Corps of Engineers for
discharge of dredge or fill material in waters of the United States, but propose to proceed
under General Permit 31 in compliance with Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms Alice N. Gordon
at [phone], Ext. 307.
Sincere ,J/-
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
cc: W/attachments
David Leckson, COE Washington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR, Department of Environmental Management
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR, Division of Coastal Management
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E. Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. John L. Smith, Jr., P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. G. R. Shirley, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
Mr. Jimmy Lee, P.E. Bridge Maintenance

WARRANT NO. 883261 1053
IF INCORRECT RETURN TO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE'
CONTROLLER'S OFFICE 883261 01-25-4F
CODE
INVOICE
NUMBER
DATE
PURCHASE
UORDER MBER
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT.
NET AMOUNT
i
F
01-24-96
I
I
250100
,
I
,
TOTAL
I
I
2 5 D 1 0 0
REMARKS:
CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
CRAVEN CO. STATE PROJ.# 5.1751
^�•_^����_ �� ��^���_> uelACrl estruhtt UtF'V5ITING
L i'S`L(luL3'.^L[ICs[I 'HE FACE CFTMS• %IEM �4l�ttCiE�B.CIt6L
661069
ST
AT.,
E`OF NORTH CAROLINA 531
DEPARTMENTFOFTRANSPORTATIONe
RALEIGHONORTH CAROLINX"� --�,
- Warrant No
883261 --
L y
' PAY TO - - r r� _ .� . •.=�.�
THE ORDER OF - �- -' .�
N.C.-ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH"AND
NATURAL RESOURCES - rti -
DIVISION OF COASTAI.'"MANAGEMENT " ` h
PO BOX 27687 n = .;
'RALEIGH, NC ', 7 7687�''q y {'�
_ - -
...e _ ___<✓_
PRESENT TO:STATETREASURER --' y% r -- _ �
— —�'
PAYABLE A7 PAR THROUGH FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
E.��'-c _u2m eE�cc. Accwrme rruseocuearvrnens.Ewn eFw cE - y I
cfc, url'L:L?uv
' MO DAY YR. AMOUNT,r -
OS 259 ::zs250;0
II•B8326111, 1:053110 5941: 5Ell000,1160i1I■
4................... "0%04s
II•B8326111, 1:053110 5941: 5Ell000,1160i1I■
4................... "0%04s

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director March 27. 1996
Mr. Franklin Vick, P.E.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Vick:
1�
�EHNF�
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application
for State approval for development of your property located at Bridge #129 on SR 1245, over
Core Creek in Craven County. It was received complete on March 27, 1996, and appears to
be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is June
10, 1996. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary
to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline
stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, this
letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be
provided on or about the 75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must
be posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a
conspicuous point along your property where it can be observed from a public road. Some
examples would be: Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-
way fronting your property; or at a point along the road right-of-way where a private road would
lead one into your property. Failure to post this notice could result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any
questions and notify me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or
comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely,
M. Ted Tyndall
Field Representative
MTT
Enclosure
cc: John Parker
Charles S. Jones
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendeil St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
January 5, 1996
Ms. Stephanie Briggs
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Ms. Briggs:
E:>FEE HNF1
This letter is in response to your December 15,1995 request for the staff of the Division
of Coastal Management (DCM) to inspect Bridge #129 and #130 on SR 1245 over Core Creek
and "Core Creek Overflow" in Craven County. The purpose of my site inspections was to
determine the CAMA jurisdiction at the sites and to determine the permit requirements of the
DCM for the replacement of the two aforementioned bridges.
Based upon my December 19, 1996 inspection, I conclude that the waters of Core Creek
are Public Trust waters. And as you are aware, Public Trust Areas are Areas of Environmental
Concern (AECs) and fall under the jurisdiction of the DCM. The replacement of Bridge #129
does constitute development and would require a permit from the Division. On the other hand,
the DCM does not have permitting authority on "Core Creek Overflow", therefore no permit
is needed from this office for the replacement of Bridge #130.
Thank you for taking the time and interest to comply with the permit requirements of this
Division. Please contact me if you have questions about this or similar projects (919-726-7021).
Sincerely,
�A/
M. Ted Tyall
Field Representative
cc: Charles Jones, DCM
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

0 DEC 1 4 1995
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA rr•....................asy
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETI' JR.
GOVERNOR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
December 15, 1995
Mr. Charles Jones
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 769
3441 Arendell Street
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Dear Mr. Jones:
SUBJECT: Craven County, Replacement of Bridge Nos. 129 and 130 on SR 1245
over Core Creek and Core Creek Overflow.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace
Bridge Nos. 129 and 130 over Core Creek and the Core Creek Overflow on
SR 1245 near Cove City in Craven County. We would appreciate the review of
the projects by your staff to determine if they are within CAMA jurisdiction.
Site maps and preliminary design sketches are enclosed to assist in your
assessment.
Your expedient processing of this request would be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms.
Alice N. Gordon at [phone], Ext. 314.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Briggs
Supervisor, Permits Unit
-r

PC

I Zd.r Irl X.
11x-14•S=f5eti B2.FC-� i PS.
P,k;,� et T-LT=11`zI?oo"�

oo=Igo.T, LT 51,00"
k ti,A,c— ,� c�)
µ.�
Keuffel & Esser Company
PLATE 1, PLAN -PRO,