NCDOT 43-96 Broad Creek

Permit Class
Permit Number
43-%
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vennit ;,J APR 0 2 1M
for •�-v►.i + u w
% Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concerrrw"•o"""""•••""""'�°
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Dept. Of Transportation, P.O. Box 25201. Raleigh, NC 27611
authorizing development in Beaufort County at Broad Creek, Bridge 105 on SR 1326
,as requested in the permittee's application dated 1119196 including attached workplan
drawings, 2, dated Feb. 1995
This permit, issued on MARCH 26, 1995 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
The riprap must be free from loose dirt or any other pollutant. It must be of a size
sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current action.
2. The riprap must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as but not limited to
granite or broken concrete.
3. All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of
regularly or irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures
to prevent spillover of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
attached sheet for Additional
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 1999
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
N. Schecter, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

MEMORANDUM
FEB 0 9 1M
TO: . r David Gossett
John Crew
DATE: 7 February 1996
SUBJECT: NC DOT Proposed Replacement of Bridge #105 over Broad Creek on SR 1326
near Washington, North Carolina
This proposal involves replacing the above referenced existing bridge with a new 135' by 28' bridge.
Public Trust AECs are involved and this proposal comes under the auspices of the March 1993 CRC
certified Beaufort County Land Use Plan update.
The plan offers the following limited guidance on proposals of this type:
County policy on AECs (page VIII-4) includes "Preserve and protect AECs within Beaufort
County" and will implement this policy by, among other activities, "c. Support development
in AECs only if such development meets the management objectives in 15 NCAC 7H.0203 and
the use standards in 15 NCAC 7H.0208 and .0209."
County policy on State and Federal programs (page VIII-9) includes "remains committed to State
and Federal programs in planning areas, where applicable, related to community and economic
development, including erosion control, public access, highway improvements, port facilities,
dredging, and military facilities."
The landward portion of this proposal is shown in the Urban Transition land classification on
the County's land classification map. This class (page IX-4) includes the idea the area will
eventually develop at urban densities with the necessary services to support that urbanization.
The waterward portion of the proposal by definition (page IX-9) is in the Conservation land
class. This class notes that land uses consistent with AEC standards are those meeting the intent
of this land classification.
My opinion is if this proposal can be accomplished in accordance with applicable AEC use and
performance standards, it will not be inconsistent with the county land use plan.
cc: -Preston Pate
John Parker

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: On SR 1326 at Bridge #105 across Broad Creek, Beaufort
County
Photo Index - 1989: No photo 1984: No photo
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,600,200 Y: 650,100 Bunyon LL
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 11 January 1996
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 24 January 1996
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A)
Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area
(C)
Water Dependent: -Yes
(D)
Intended Use: Public highway
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Highground
±300 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±300 sq. ft. or 0.006 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C-SWP-NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing bridge with a new 135'
long by 28' wide bridge.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge #105 over Broad Creek
Beaufort County
Environmental setting,
The project that is being proposed at this time is the replacement of NC DOT Bridge
#105 on SR 1326 across Broad Creek in Beaufort County. The section of SR 1326 on which
the bridge is located is a rural unpaved road. Broad Creek at this location has been channelized.
The existing bridge has a length of 138' and a width of 20'. Navigation clearance beneath the
existing bridge is 6 foot 6 inches above the NWL. Other than an existing spoil berm which
extends along the eastern side of the creek, areas which border the creek are vegetated with
wetland vegetation consisting predominately by red maples, myrtles and some pines.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge along the existing alignment.
The new bridge will be 135' long and will have a width of 28'. Navigation clearance beneath
the bridge will not change and will remain at 6 foot 6 inches. Very little shoulder modifications_
will be required, only a slight amount of upland excavation will be required.
Environmental impact
The project as proposed should have a minimal environmental impact. No wetland
vegetation, nor public trust areas, will be excavated and/or filled.
David L. Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 6 February 1996

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker
�V
FROM: David Gossett V
THROUGH: Terry Moore d'f�
DATE: 6 February 1996
SUBJECT: Request for CAMA Major Development Permit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Bridge #105 over Broad Creek on SR 1326
Beaufort County, North Carolina
I have reviewed the proposed project in regards to NCAC 7H guidelines, specifically the
use standards, and have determined that the proposed project is consistent with these guidelines.
As a result, I recommend that the permit be issued with the following conditions:
(1) The riprap material must be free from loose dirt or any other pollutant. It must
be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current
action.
(2) The riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as but
not limited to granite or broken concrete. Materials such as tires, car bodies,
scrap metal, paper products, tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar
material, are not considered riprap.
(3) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of
regularly or irregularly flooded wetlands behind adequate dikes or other retaining
structures to prevent spill -over of solids into any wetlands or surrounding waters.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me at ext. 275.

0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DMSION OF HIGHWAYS .
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
January 22, 1995
Mr. David Gossett
Division of Coastal Management
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Mr. Gossett:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: Beaufort County, Replacement of Bridge Nos. 38 on SR 1924 over South Creek
and 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek, State Project No. 5.1551.
Enclosed is a copy of the CAMA permit application, drawings and a copy of the fee check
for the above referenced projects. The proposed action will include the demolition and
replacement of bridge Nos. 38 over South Creek and 105 over Broad Creek. The bridges will be
replaced along existing alignment and will not require temporary detours.
The work at bridge number 38 across South Creek will require the relocation of the
roadside ditch. The fill in surface waters will be 0.008 acres and the excavation in wetlands will be
0.008 acres. No impacts to surface waters or wetlands are anticipated for the bridge (#105)
across Broad Creek.
The NCDOT is requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permit. By copy of this letter we are requesting the review and
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Environmental Management
and a Section 404 permit form the US Army Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please do not hesitate to call Scott P. Gottfried at 919-733-7844, Ext. 307.
Sincer y, )�
Ffanklin Vick, P.E., Manager
HFV/sg Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Jimmy Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, PE, Structure Design
Mr. Rick Shirley, PE, Division 2 Engineer

FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b.
City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT
Washington
C.
Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner:
SR 1326
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation
d.
Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P.O. Box 25201
e.
Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC
river, creek sound, bay) Broad Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3.
DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone]
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent:
a.
List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name N. C. Dept. of Transportation
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replacement of existing bridge with new
Address P. O. Box 25201
bridge.
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone] b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax [phone]
C. Project name (if any) Beaufort County_ C. Will the project be for public, private or
Replace Bridge No. 105 commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
,vote: Pemit will be issued in name of landoxv,er(s), methods of construction and daily operations
and/orproject name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation.
Upgrading of SR 1326. Existing bridge in
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED _poor condition. Replace bridge along
PROJECT existing alignment. Construction will
utilize typical roadway construction
equipment and methods.
a. County Beaufort
Revised 03/95

FORM DCM-MP-1
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4.
LAND AND WATER
N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a.
Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b.
Size of individual lot(s) N/A
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
C.
Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL Natural ground elev. 98.5 (assumed)
datum discharges.) Surface runoff along eject
Natural ground elev. ±5.0 (U.S.G.S. Quad)
d.
Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sandy loam/ Organic muck
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e.
Vegetation on tract Various upland
N/A
vegetation
f..
Man-made features now on tract
Wooden bridge
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g.
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
In addition to the completed application form, the
plan.)
following items must be submitted:
Conservation X Transitional/Urban
Developed _ Community
Rural _ Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not zoned
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? _ Yes _ No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? _ Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? _ Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? _
(Attach documentation, if available)
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I I" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03195

FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See Sheet 3 of 3
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the —/?f, of %/�,., . 19 /�P .
Print Name H. Franklin Vick P.E.
Signature
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
_ DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03195

• . Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
g.
Length of proposed bridge 135'
1.
BRIDGES.
h.
Width of proposed bridge 28'
a.
Public X Private
i.
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b.
Type of bridge (construction material)
N/A
Reinforced concrete
j.
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C.
Water body to be crossed by bridge
If yes, explain
Broad Creek
d.
Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 4.0 (+/-)
k.
'Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e.
Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
6.6'
X Yes No
If yes,
1.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 138'
reducing or increasing the -existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 20'
opening? Yes X No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
If yes, explain
bridge 6.6'
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of existing bridge
will be removed allowing for new bridge.
in.
Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
f.
Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
n.
Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? _
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
e.
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Revised 03/95
Yes No
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards `
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
C. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated Total +/-10'
(2) Width of area to be excavated Total +/-30'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/45 c.v. for bridge abutments
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Unland area to be Drovided by contractor.
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No N/A
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.

Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b.
maintenance? Yes No N/A
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No N/A
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above. C.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No N/A
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _ Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
9-
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled.
(3) Purpose of fill
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: No
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? By stringent erosion
control - NCDOT Standards
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical bridge construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT - Replace Bridge No. 105 in Beaufort County
Applicant or Project Nam
ignature
Date
Revised 03195

Y
rL
x:1 V Ixl 6 N "
e L 0d 1
., Fu< t
OW °'v � a,
rw VJ rxxl -
v` IW
JkOt
L a S W
L" %
W.
C
I`
t>ffi
__:IsIR
i.l [
!Q � ..3 .Il '\ %i ?• _Oayla. Gm. ,mA 1>�
IIaOI ' ' HINGTO
PARK \ e a ian ,r�O0.
• ` '' qu � via[ \': \� �. �` 0 .an '. a y l.�we
3.
6
wo°Jam I r .64 �luum ema( L fnlvrnbu+
IQ at�°aa- 3CVR0[IOOnQ l 11
mtllell ¢I ! r 11 I IS I tlJ;xn°a G<zwell ,' j 0i� I . CalPm! *
i 1, 1 C•,eltr '. Iliamsto 1, ouaan �`� vly oulB coal a �S )
Ta, ! ' x<bq RobuSonviil!=mi t1 f* e�,..,.,,r ne.[ Fryl^s ° T
Retntll 'mete M A R WASHINGTON r.rr.a„_vn. rl t,naL"¢l
� r cs
e 13 -'� ealG,sa wnsona 2 des rna La4e T Y R I 30 16 w
E L
3: t
r ' Staea ,— Il II a 9
pu vo Lr..b
'
", \ / 15 Pike Roe —
e a'1 Dose � I \. �' AI/ivoaor a ��I
U / r� 9P,<tWVf 1 010 F.! GA Q5 1rn.....
26a 6 l Prnel Sale 0f Miles 1
Greenville+ IQ * I rs A<le ieel, M' cite'. 5 0 5 10 20 ra9 30
r pson cis rliashingi0 32 c0+ x (fl lE<[[nv 0 l0 20 30 a - Ce
Blrm<st,n 7u -.J.t .--
! vn/ , 59 Sale °f Ribmeters
e . Wmtemll! 11 Cnocowmry I L .L 1 /
° • � 3 i p Wrna
Ayden itm[rma0ine °^+le°(' �'°""' } N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
c""° wrbe„ a our a;4 BEAUFORT COUNTY BR.# 105
Grlton e3 1/\,C. ¢enne, I P.mlr<!e' ON SR-1326 OVER BROAD
11 U, Glssxo,0 - '
el.1 o'a sI CREEK. PROP. 3 @ 45'SPAN
r" -
ns� ss YurcebwoEO.uO I GeM
�1 Fa '!^"R SHEET I OF - 3 FEB.95

Sr
O. p G7.T1
Qj
t
C14-9PO i
_ _ R EA;;
a�c�I �I SAP
To s -131 - - - - S G ° 'E - - - - 5 R-132 6 To 5 R,1328
� I
1 n 10-
p
O 6r:d5e
O r CC
II
L7 " oPZ•,
A,/4S. DAILY FLOW Z;5C',F.S, STA. /o t-7/J 90°She CrW
/Vo FILL JAI WATERS 3 O - 56-o' Dz"s ;. CORED SLho
No FJLL IN WFTAR,4P5 CROWN
o J10
!] ;;]] 3 -ffom of Ex:sr:.j
POr Pn{PreraStl &:lj!
CrRADb E,YISTJ/Ja
CL. ca
R� �ao I O
i a
�1?RR➢ N.G.
I
I I NWL . EL. S4.g
90
lX� IsT�NG 'I I pRoP• J✓oTF GRADE 1"!sc�To
PIERS �7Ets -ZA
/,L1I1,AJr /k/ EX15i
uN)cZ lERR1rN�E,
Ai-w gpl5,j Exc-,I-r:.- I
d -P.r 6,.15e A6,.T�..ts
De�oTrs : Proposer/ 6r,d5c
-
S CALF; 1"=5or,YoRz.�/"=/01YER%
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY BR.# 105
ON SR-1326 OVER BROAD
CREEK. PROP. 3 @ 45'SPAN
SHEET —a--OF FEB.95
Of

O
COY ELLSWORTH WOOLARD
RT.#5 BOX 384
WASHINGTON,N.C. 27889
O
COY ELLSWORTH WOOLARD
RT.#5 BOX 384
WASHINGTON,N.C. 27889
OLESLIE
E. WOOLARD JR.
& CORY WOOLARD
P.O. BOX 36220
RALEIGH, N.C. 27686
OMITCHEL
L. CANADY
& MERTON CANANDY
RT.#5 BOX 307 M
WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889

MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Mulligan
Deborah Sawyer
FROM: David Gossett l7G
DATE: 6 February 1995
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Permit and/or Dredge & Fill Permit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Bridge #105 over Broad Creek
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Attached is an application for a CAMA Major and/or a Dredge & Fill permit which was
received by me on 24 January 1996. I am considering this application complete, have
acknowledged receipt, and have begun processing.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.