NCDOT 19-02 White Oak River

rermta,t ums I
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA-- .
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
for.
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Permit Number
19-02
r-
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh; NC 27699-1548
Authorizing development in Carteret County at Adj. White Oak River, at the northeast comer of
the bridge from Cedar Point to Sm=boro as requested in the permittee's application dated 9/7/Ol. WdaQ2kmental
sA
and
This ermit, issued on 2/12102 e
P, , is to compliance with the application (were consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of th,se terns may
be subject.to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void. -
Cedar Point Mitigation Site
1) This;permit does not conveyor impiy,approval of the suitability of this property for compensatory
wetland mitigation for any particular project. The use of any portion of this site as compensatory
mitigation for future projects will be determined on a case -by -case basis during the CAMA permit
review and consistency process.
f
's.. 2) The permittee shall conduct a wetland delineation to determine the amount of low marsh and the amount
of high marsh currently on the site prior to the, initiation of construction and once again after the site has
t achieved its hydrologic and vegetative success criteria. The results of these wetland delineations.shall
be submitted to DCM for approval.
L� (See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
' This. permit action may be appealed by the ,permittee or Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and
' other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
' date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
' continuance as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
, Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2005
In issuing this permit, the State of.North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
nna D. Moffitt, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby, accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Page 2 of 4 `
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) Mitigation or other remedial actions may be required for permanent impacts to coastal wetlands if the
mitigation site fails to meet its hydrologic and vegetative success criteriawithin 5 years of project
construction.
4) Mitigation or other remedial actions may be required for temporarily impacted coastal wetlands that
have not reattained jurisdictional wetland status within 3 years of project construction.
5) The permittee shall minimize the need to cross wetlands in transporting equipment to the maximum
extent practicable. Mats will be used when. crossing wetlands to minimize temporary wetland impacts.
NOTE- The N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) will not require mitigation for the
approximately .237 acres of shallow bottom habitat that is being filled to construct the project:
6) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated
wetlands is.not authorized. This condition also applies to removal of the existing breakwater.
7) No excavation of shallow water bottom or any wetlands is authorized by this permit, except as depicted,
on the attached workplan drawings.
8) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters,
outside of the areas indicated on the attached workplan drawings.
9) All fill material must be, clean and•free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities.
10) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or irregularly
flooded vegetated wetlands behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of
solids into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters, except for those areas where the excavated
materials will be used as substrate for marsh restoration as described in. the attached, permit application.
Construction of the tidal channel
11) Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent short term and long term erosion of the side slopes of the
tidal channel.
12) The tidal channel bank will be at approximately 1.0 feet elevation; and the bottom of the tidal channel
will be at approximately 0.00 feet elevation. Excavation of the tidal channel shall not exceed
approximately 0.00 elevation.
Construction of the Breakwater Structure
13) The existing deteriorating offshore breakwater fill shall be removed in its entirety, including the
associated manmade debris (wood, tires, fiberglass panels and concrete rubble.)
14) The authorized alignment of the proposed breakwater structure must be staked by a representative of
DCM within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of any construction.
15) The new breakwater structure must be completely constructed prior to the commencement of excavation
and grading behind the breakwater.

Page 3 of 4
ADDITIONAL. CONDITIONS
16) No backfill of the breakwater or any other "filling of wetlands, estuarine waters or public trust areas is
authorized by this permit, except as depicted on the attached workplan drawings.
17) The height of the permitted breakwater shall not exceed sic inches above mean high water or the normal
water level.
18) Placement of the rock breakwater shall be limited to the areas as depicted on the attached workplan
drawings. The breakwater rock must be clean and free from loose dirt or any pollutant except in trace
quantities. It must be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current
action.
19) The breakwater shall be marked at 50 foot intervals with yellow reflectors extending at least three feet
above mean high water.
20) The permittee shall maintain the breakwater in good condition and in conformance with the terms and
conditions ofthispermit or the remaining breakwater structure shall be removed within 90 days of.
notification from DCM.
NOTE: The permittee and/or his contractor is strongly encouraged to contact a representative of the
North Carolina Coastal Federation at [phone] to discuss the breakwater structure design
prior to project initiation.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control.
21) This project is in a High Quality Water Zone and must comply with the Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds, 15A NCAC 4B..0124.
22) This project must conform to all requirements of the NC Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and NC
DOT's Memorandum of Agreement with the Division of Land Resources. .
23) Immediately prior to the initiation of construction, the permittee shall install turbidity curtains in the
water area immediately adjacent to the mitigation site, including the existing and proposed breakwater
structure. The turbidity curtains are to be properly maintained and retained in the water until .
construction is complete. The turbidity curtains shall be removed when turbidity within the curtains
reaches ambient levels.
24) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction must not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
f25) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures must be implemented to ,
1 ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands., watercourses and property (e.g. silt fence,
s diversion swales_or berms, sand fence, etc.).
Use of Cedar Point Mitigation Site as mitigation for futureyroiect impacts
26) The final mitigation credits generated at this site will be determined by the difference between the
results of the pre and post -construction wetland delineations required by Condition No. 2 of this CAMA
permit..

• Page 4 of 4 > w
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
27) If this site is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts', written concurrence must be obtained
from DCM, the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ), the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF )
and the N.C.Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) that post -construction monitoring demonstrates
that hydrologic and vegetative success criteria have been met. Although annual monitoring reports to
DCM; DWQ, DMF and WRC will not be required, hydrologic and vegetative monitoring data shall be
made available to review agencies at such time as the site is proposed for use as mitigation.
NOTE: Mitigation credit for marsh restoration will not be allowed for the footprint of the new
breakwater structure.
NOTE: If this site is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts, the permittee should revise the
Cedar Point Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Planning Report currently dated November2000..
The revised report should include the final approved site plan as described in the permit
application package dated 9/7/01, including the supplemental letter dated 11/20/01, and the
attached workplan drawings (7): 5 dated as received on 9/28/01, and 2 dated 11/19/01. The
Cedar Point mitigation site Final Mitigation Planning Report should also be'revised to include
any conditions of this CAMA permit and should also include an as -built report.
NOTE: If this site is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts, the entire. mitigation site of
approximately 14.34 acres covered by this permit shall be protected in. perpetuity 'iri its restored
state according to the. approved final mitigation plan and shall be owned by the permittee or its
approved designee. An appropriate conservation easement; deed restriction or other appropriate.
instrument shall be attached to the title for the subject property and a copy of such provided to
DCM.
NOTE: It is strongly recommended that the permittee monitor reference areas or biological benchmarks
concurrently with the mitigation area in order to provide adequate data to determine success.
General'
28) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all navigable
waters adjacent to the authorized work. The permitted activity must not interfere with the public's right
to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States.
29) The authorized activity will not cause an unacceptable interference with navigation.
30) The N.C. Division of Water Quality has authorized -the proposed project under General Water Quality
Certification No. 3274 (DWQ Project No. 01-1850), which was issued on 1/14/02. Any violation of this
General Water Quality Certification will be considered a violation of this CAMA permit.
NOTE; This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required.
NOTE, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) authorized the proposed project under Nationwide
Permit No. 27 (Action ID Number 200100396) which was issued on 1/29/02.
The permittee is encouraged to contact the Public. Health Pest Management Section at (919) 733-
6407 to discuss mosquito control measures.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD 4V
1) APPLICANT: NC Department of Transportation County: Carteret
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Highway 24, at the northeast corner of the bridge from Cedar Point to
Swansboro.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: November 26, 2001
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: Yes To Be Forwarded: No
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Bill Arrington DISTRICT OFFICE: Morehead\
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW:
B) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED IN RALEIGH: FEE RECD:$Lf N
PUBLIC NOTICE RECD: END OF NOTICE DATE: I S d
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES RECD: DEED RECD:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE:
FEDERAL DUE DATE:
ON:
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE
FED COMMENTS RECD:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
K' •
AGENCY
DATE CONRAE TS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management - Regional Representative
Coastal Management - LUP Consistency
Division of Community Assistance
Land Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Storm Water Management (DWQ)
State Property Office
Division of Archives & History
Division of Environmental Health
Division of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
Division, of Water Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
Submerged Lands (DW

MEMORANDUM:
TO: DOUG HUGGETT
FROM: BILL ARRINGTON
SUBJECT: COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - CAMA MAJOR PERMIT —
Cedar Point Restoration Site, Highway 24, Cedar Point, Carteret County
DATE: December 10, 2001
The following are my comments and recommendations regarding the above mentioned proposal
The project consists of replacing the existing breakwater with a rock breakwater just offshore and
excavating the filled areas behind the new breakwater and adjacent to Highway 24 to restore low
marsh and create a stream. Of the 45,658 square feet of Area of Environmental Concern disturbed,
Approximately 34,000 square feet will be restored to low marsh and 8,000 square feet will be the
breakwater. DOT worked to minimize impacts by decreasing the depth of the stream channel
dissecting the site. The White Oak River is coastal water. The project is well designed with
minimization of impacts. I would recommend the project be approved contingent upon the following
conditions:
1) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or
vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
2) No excavated or fill material will be placed at anytime, in any marsh or surrounding waters,
outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the work plats.
3) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or
irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent
spillover of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
4) The breakwater rock will be clean and free of any lose dirt or pollutants, except in trace
quantities.
5) In order to protect water quality, runoff from the construction must not visibly increase the
amount of suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
6) Breakwater must be constructed prior to excavation and grading behind breakwater.
7) All fill material must be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities. Metal
products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.

8) Planting rate, soil physiology and soil fertility of excavated and filled areas shall insure
vegetative coverage in one growing season.
9) Drop -down areas are included every 100 feet as recommended by NOAA.
10) The breakwater is flagged every 50 feet with yellow reflectors at least 3 feet above mean high
water.
Cc: Doug Huggett.
Charles Jones
Ted Tyndall

December 10, 2001
Carteret News Times
Legal Advertisement Section
P.O. Box 1679
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Public Notice - Carteret County
Dear Sir:
Please publish the attached Notice in the Sunday, December 16, 2001, issue of the
Carteret News Times.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original
copy of the published notice, and an original invoice to Jaye Poole, NC Division of
Coastal Management, 1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
1638, Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact me at our Morehead City office [phone].
Sincerely,
Bill Arrington
D.O.T. Field Representative
wla
Enclosure
cc: Ted Tyndall, District Manager
Doug Huggett

1
NOTICE OF FILING
OF APPLICATION FOR
CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment and Natural Resourses hereby gives public notice as
required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an Area of
Environmental Concern as designated under the CAMA was received on November 26, 2001.
According to said application, the North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting to
replace the existing breakwater and restore approximately 3/ of an acre of low marsh at the
northeast corner of the Highway 24 Bridge from Cedar Point to Swansboro, in the town of Cedar
Point, in Carteret County. A copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at the
office of Bill Arrington, NC Division of Coastal Management, located at 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron
Plaza H, Morehead City, NC, [phone] during normal business hours.
Comments mailed to Donna D. Moffitt, Director, Division of Coastal Management, 1638
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1638, prior to January 5, 2002, will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time of
permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review.. and comment by the public and
state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided upon
written request.
PUBLISHED ON: Please publish on December 16, 2001

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
��
NCDENR
N UR .0FHRT of
Em"p mmG 4 o NFl R1 RE Rcm
151-B HWY. 24, HESTRON BUILDING
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
TO:
OFFICE:
TELEPHONE #:
FROM:
• �►ISIOV OF RJR
RE:
DATE SENT:, 1 O
16/
FAX #: j 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET:

P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
DEC-10-2001 MON 02:42 PM
DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE M# DP
DEC-10 02:41 PM 97266016 47" 3 SEND OK 437

Development Type
FEE DCM%
DWQ%
.-
(14300 16014351000931625 6253)
(243001602 435100095 2341
I. Private, non-cammerdal
,
development that does not involve
S250 100%(S250)
0%($0)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas
11. Public or commercial development
that does not involve the filling or
$400 100 % ($400)
- 0 % (SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas.
..
111. For development that involves the
_.
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies.
III(A). For Pdvate,non-commercial
development, If General water Quality
S250 100% (S250)
0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attamed)
can be applied
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality
$400 100 % (5400)
0 % ($0)
Certification No.3301 (see a"ac hed)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Waler Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and
S400 60% (S240) ,
40% ($160)
written DWQ wricurence is needed
bemuse of concerns related to wdter
quality or aquatic life:
- III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301(see attached)
S400 60%(S240)
40%($160)
can not be applied:
,
IV. For development that involves
'
the filling and/or excavation of more
S475 60 % ($285)
40 % (5190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department. of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Highway 24, in Carteret County, at the northeast
corner of the bridge from Cedar Point to Swansboro
Photo Index -2000: Photo #457, grid 11 N 1995: Photo # 436, grid 2 0
State Plane Coordinates x 2568000 y: 344400
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 7/3, 10/29 & 11/28/2001
Was Agent Present - YES (Phillip Todd)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received-11/26/2001
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan -Carteret County
Land Classification from LUP - Rural, Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT, EW, CS, and CW
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Mitigation for future Coastal Wetland impacts
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - breakwater
Planned - breakwater
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
Excavated Filled
Other
(A) Coastal Wetlands - SSpartina
alterniflora. Spartina patens, Distichlis
4,118 sf
spicata
(B) Shallow Bottom
10,340 sf
(C) Other - High Ground in AEC
31,200 sf
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 45,658 sf (1.048 acres)
(E) Total area disturbed by project 1.048 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: No
(G) Water Classification: SA HQW
(H) Open for Shellfishing: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the
degraded breakwater with an offshore rock structure, and restore low marsh to be used as
restoration mitigation credit for future transportation projects.

V
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — Cedar Point Restoration
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is the northeast corner of the Highway 24 Bridge, from Cedar Point to
Swansboro, in Carteret County. Elevation of the existing fill at the restoration site is
approximately 9 feet, and the breakwater is 5 feet in elevation. The general purpose of the project
is to replace the deteriorating breakwater, which is armored on the offshore side with wood, tires
and fiberglass panels. A new rock structure will be constructed immediately offshore, and the
existing fill will be removed and the site graded and planted to restore low marsh between the
breakwater and the existing marsh. Existing fill will be excavated adjacent to Highway 24 to
restore low marsh and construct a channel to carry estuarine water to and from the marsh.
The site is bordered by the White Oak River on the west, low coastal marsh (Suartina alterniflora)
on the north and northeast, a filled commercial storage site and metal building on the east, and
Highway 24 on the south. Predominant vegetation on and adjacent to this site includes Suartina
alteriflora. Spartina patens. Distichlis spicata, and myrtles. This area is primarily commercial.
The site consists of a filled peninsula adjacent to Highway 24 and a filled area along Highway 24
which extends 50' perpendicular from highway 24 near the bridge and extends 100' perpendicular
from Highway 24 at the property line farthest from the bridge. The breakwater begins near the
bridge east headwall and extends perpendicular to highway 24 approximately 490'. Storm damage
has eroded the breakwater on the offshore side significantly and reverted the final 170 feet of the
breakwater to shallow bottom and coastal marsh (except 600 square feet of high ground and
concrete rubble at the very end). The area between the breakwater and fill adjacent to Highway 24
is shallow bottom and low marsh (Suartina alterniflora) in equal parts. No evidence of shellfish
was noted. The filled storage site to the east has a metal building and is void of perennial
vegetation. Soils in the area include Corolla Urban Land Complex and Carteret sand, frequently
flooded. The White Oak River is classified SA HQW at the project site by the North Carolina
Division Of Water Quality. The area is open to the taking of shellfish for consumption, and is not
designated as Primary Nursery Area by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. The
Carteret County Land Use Plan designates the project area as Rural, with all CAMA Areas of
Environmental Concern designated as Conservation.
The proposal is to replace the deteriorating, storm -damaged breakwater with a new stone
breakwater designed as recommended by the North Carolina Coastal Federation literature. The
area between the breakwater and the existing marsh will be graded and filled with sand from the
site to the same elevation as the existing low marsh, including approximately 1400 square feet of
high coastal marsh. This area will then be planted with Suartina alterniflora. The high ground fill
adjacent to Highway 24 will be graded at a 3:1 slope down to an elevation of 1.2 feet. The grade
will then become almost flat approaching the 8-foot wide steam channel dissecting the site. The
stream channel bank will be at 1.0 feet elevation and the bottom of the stream will be at 0.00
elevation. The area on the north side of the stream will then rise gradually to meet the existing
elevations that currently are vegetated with Spartina alterniflora. Twenty feet of the west end of
the stream and 70 feet of the east end of the stream (approximately 30 feet wide) will be excavated
in coastal marsh. This area has been deducted from the area the NC DOT has requested
restoration mitigation credit.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — Cedar Point Restoration
PAGE 3
The restoration area adjacent to Highway 24 will be approximately 270 feet wide parallel to
Highway 24, 30 feet deep at the west end and 90 feet deep at the east end. The restoration area
behind the breakwater will be approximately 40 feet wide by 490 feet long. The breakwater will
be constructed from large rock. The area under the breakwater will be excavated to —1.15 feet. A
geotextile fabric will be installed. The breakwater will be approximately 16 feet wide and will rise
with 1.5:1 slope to an elevation of 2.5 feet. The White Oak River side of the breakwater will
include a ledge at 0.35 feet elevation approximately 3 feet wide.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the replacement of the existing breakwater, grading of the site and excavation of the
stream will result in: Approximately 2718 square feet of low marsh and 1400 square feet of high
marsh being excavated for the new stream and the low marsh behind the breakwater;
approximately 10,340 feet of shallow bottom will be excavated and filled to install the breakwater
and obtain grade behind the breakwater; approximately 31,200 square feet of high ground will be
excavated adjacent to Highway 24 and behind the new breakwater to install the low coastal marsh
and stream. The entire project is in the CAMA Coastal Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern.
Navigational use of the area can occur presently and this use could be expanded with the addition
of the stream. This site was filled in the distant past and the restored areas will result in site
conditions similar to their original hydrology and vegetation. The NC DOT has reduced the
estuarine system excavation impacts associated with this proposal by using higher elevations in the
stream and hand clearing. There is a high probability of turbidity expected during the
construction of the breakwater and marsh. The NC DOT has proposed to use design standards for
sensitive watersheds and standard NC DOT BMP's to minimize these impacts. The primary use.
of this site will be for future mitigation needs.. The restoration should improve the water quality in
the area by reducing erosion and increasing the area of low marsh. The replacement of the
breakwater will protect the fragile marsh system behind it.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 1.048 acres. Most of this area will be restored to
coastal marsh.
Bill Arrington December 10, 2001 Morehead City

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
SWtStJSt3o&0} CE.I&L.
1. APPLICANT
c. Street address or secondary road number
�l C ';�q
a. Landowner:
Name W - C • T^�fx rt � Tea,Svice cusicN
Address 1" B t AL- &-tv'"- U 'lre 2
City ZhVkk(sH
State h' (--
Zip -I" Day Phone 'I M --i33
Fax 92194
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
c. Project name (if any)
Swp'vStiaeo � 04.�x�e• Pam"
NOTE: Pemdt wia be ismed in nwm of iandowner(s), and/or
Project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) uotbr M 04'L Y'^`t t R-
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home,` motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Op.1S'tYN Lc MiT (a aTro�{ 5�`Y c_
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NEW LOQKK-
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? 91 St3 i c
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
ccw'ay N (.c M%T C' L 7%0tS . Si T"
VOy- F`rTy t-t U&4-

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract rar, - wt—14ai �f'2t
b. Size of individual lot(s) 141 p
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 0-5
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
SAwln SAN" W,L�r"
e. Vegetation on tract l��
f. Man-made features now on tract
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Conrab the lot land we plan.)
Conservation X Transitional
�Y Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
LQNV—, CG 44-
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes )_ No
(Anach zoNng wv pam w wMficaue, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? x Yes No
If yes, by whom? vmEr- C M2PA 1`2 crM �z
rtp,s e'-Z%os " Nf Dar
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? `I£S
(Anach do="wwadm, if amailable)
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/p
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, 'wash
down' and residential discharges.)
lEaF/aC—t- ?,kJQ OFF w we 1� s�+tae ti
uwgg, Sd'- -,"—
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N Ila
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a'copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an g 12' by 11' white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone]
Form DCM-MP-1
i
site. include Ihighway or secondary 'toad (SR).
numbers, iaodmnrks, and the like.
I
• A Storrlrwater Certitimtion, if one is necessary. . .
• A list of the names and complete addresses Or the
adjacrtnt waterfront (riparian) landowners and.
signed return ree+:ipts v Proof that such owlet" •
here received it COPY of the applkation: and Plata
by eartified n1a11. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit. =.=Pots :
on the•. proposed project to the Divislon:of Coastal:
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant':
further certifies'; that such notice has been p wlded:
Name
Address %04 n l8 .
Phone goo►-� t.1C D$'734
Name c of 5stenssbaen
Address wK.$
Phone010'
Name
Address QAQ Ce/wmC Six
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal Permits issued. for
work on'the project tract. Include peraiit.nd®bees;
perwittee, and issuing dates.
Dec 4 '01 16:43 P.03
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
xp¢i cation wUI allow only the development described in
to application. The project will be subject to conditions
and,calrietions Contained lq the permit.
i certify thst to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
seiiviry-complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
Conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
1. Wtify that I am authorised to grant, and do in fact,
..gtatd permission to representatives of State and federal
11MOW. agencies to enter On the a wanentioned lands In
Cooaoetion with evaluating information related to this
permit, application and follow-up monitoring of the
ptojed.
4.ga her certify that the information provided In this
application is truthful to the beet of my knowledge.
-M. *I& is the —edgy of I .-2_1"
Print Nan* \l pC—• I�i nxAReJ .r t� •� _ Er: (ace r�
$>j�tfatur0,7%-H
rm,do.xr or Aedmrixed Arm
Plean indicate atnchmeats Pertaining to your Proposed
• A check for $260 made payable to Department of project.
Environment, ; Health, and Natural Resources.
(DEHNR) to `eaver the costs of proceasing :tie::.., :: • ./ . DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
application. ✓ DCM MP-3 Upland Development
e A signed AEC hazard notice for projects :hn:
oceanfront and', inlet areas.
• A statement: of compliance with. the N-C:.
]Envirbmnertai Policy Act (N.C•G.S. -113A -1 to::
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use lof public lands, attach * statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental; Policy Act.
i
DCM MP-4 Structures Iaformatloo
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM my-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in Nee
. space provided at the bottom of each form.

11 Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Flml
EsEstlrtq Prnled
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
rtabiliution)
t'toiu s'si. —
3�is3 E`I
-ieTn� fxcA��ON — t}, b84
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated'.
Fw r�atTcY,:�t—
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? iL Yes _ No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 3y—
r.,n��tit.—► 1Vt0 Cl
opa 0i
�a.4rninvtRo.1
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area LN'1 .2 L"
Ssowsc" qal <A-
b. Dimensions of disposal area w /a
c. Do you claim tide to disposal area? N /A
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area
maintenance? —Yes
If yes, where?
be available for future
_ No tJ JQ
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes ✓ No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes ✓ No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead ✓ Riprap
b. Length 'tom
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
35�
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
seer, 4 j
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material CLpsz z
Wl— e&P Foe. S'MVice. M
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap L+aao cy
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material Ct as I e{t' P-cP ,
i. Source of fill material
N /A
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes ✓ No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
✓ Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area cy
(2) Purpose of fill"'
Tftp 'y S7 r-ns>t$ZA att.A �F 6�r.i rcin,c..�
MAz� Ac7RA
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
�ecti>—ri cve.-rz (FtAATNLa� , bEs fall
g�-p..,c�cce.t�t Gdt. SE�.ISTNE.. WPrc.ts�nc ,
Fy.Z..nAl.n WC'bCX T�'tiT'S
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
V-tic' 14 con+S��c rr� E�v�ianE�rr
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? ✓ Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. ir- Ne sxti
'p&?ALTS ->,3 1,J4.TLont�4
rP Ja
P.-aI�WM F�11„'"SAc2n Mlil btmo..l
Applimat or Peoj Name
A/ L- , U.'b', r"%ono —
swnw e
a I,
Date
Revised 03l95

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed N /4
b. Number of lots or parcels
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) N/�'
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc.
13� ,iK1ar�
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
3 't acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
d If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
zcontrol plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? -Yes v,,"_ No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
N A
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. N /A
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes _ V No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
N /A
j. Have the facilities described in Itemm. above
received state or local approval.'
(Attach appropriate documenmdon)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
N/A
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g., well, community, public system, etc.)
is I -A
m. Will water be impounded? _ Yes `� No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? Lo — /A
�P� q�y4p�OtIJ M�(TpT11wa Q�i.
�-a�o�uJt�1 bg
Appllrant or Project Name Signaturt
Date

Form DCM-MP4
Csa�,E., VCoIr-T
�,A�Lwt�cR. �-twcty�
STRUCTURES'
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
(5) Finger Piers —Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6) Platform(s) Yes _No
(/)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
Number of slips proposed _
Proximity of structure to
property lines
Width of water body
Water depth at waterward
MLW or NWL
adjacent riparian
end of pier at
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) N % A
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) — N /A
(1)
Number
(2)
Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1)
Length 490
(2)
Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands as
(3)
Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands 1+5-
e. Mooring buoys — N IA
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete dercripdon)
l�P � G�cDPL 'R�WT twTiGpleN S�
�-a�oswM €w�s�w r�rc�at..s`s4.
AppH=t or sect Name pp rr I
Signature
Date

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Figure 2: Proposed Condition
b
b� °•
GQ�O.y °• yy
' b
0y'• •: l�2PO °
.fib •
yb �
.O• tl
MHW Line 4 Area Disturbed
,y tlry (2.5' Elevati Below MHW
N/f ry1
JOHN. N.4
.0 LOTS B.JONES '
Area Disturbed .ti
+'• Below MHW °•
IWI Ihl o, i
NIF
41
a a J �...
la s bp`
-..w—.' u.am..uwaw—......_.......
.. ='S{��.......: .......W»......_,,,;,;,,,,,,,,J,v-....M,......».M.x.._._.'0.r..,..__..� �tl " ... y�e ` flOPOSED N/M
I ......
'_.�.. P�.....EXISTING ..EXISTING N/W
NCB HW'f 2�4
•—_--�-1----'IOR fi--- b 1 bb GRAPHIC SCALE
« EXIST.EDGE OF PAVEMENT
lq
o u
a

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Figure 3: All Areas Disturbed By Construction
6pPo oy^ N
y
b
• 2` p0 0
�yN
b
0 1N �• a
A
yN q
N`'• o
MHW Line Area Disturbed
,N a (2.5' Elevoti ,o Below MHW
b.
N
JOJam..R.B .•
LO15 B. JONES '
c Area Disturbed ryN
Below MHW o^ 01 ti :q'••
.�.. N'^c3�'" �� 0, WOLEY
........>,N �
131 r� e''• •' � o
4 •'
'�;�•., _ Area Disturbed
Above MHW
4014
�! b
6 3 b�1
'yyt^_• �b N `y ...... NPBOPOSEO Bq
•;�'',"'It �.'•.. bY:..... ..... N ,�..... ......................_.. • �«-......�.i�..- •�E%K tM Bq h...............
..... bo �"1 b• ^r1
--........� ..-...�.e.�^` ^- - - - N b �. g3ffi y
----'"�mv ti----3• ----'�Ob —'�b'N—----b— ....—
. NC..•'.•.• HWYN 24
GRAPHIC SOLE
« «
EXIST. EOCE Of PAVEMENT
0

EDGE OF EXISTING
MHW Line EIP HARSH i SWANSBORO MITIGATION
(2.5' Elevation) a^ SITE (R-2 105WM)
Area Disturbed
Below MHW FIGURE 3: All Ar as Disturbed
yh
\ \ EXIST. MARSH
o M1 by Construction
Area Disturbed �.
Above MHW ��. ,ay.. • �., ha M1
----- Area Disturbed
!� Below MHW
a
h ' s
O EIP
•-
` ' v':':: • :a ^ �� Area Disturbed Above MHW
V- EL= 0.24,
-�RfV `;' ,`'?�. • ,�• ,`. �' NC GRID
NAD 83
�� �"�.•oe o % N/F
,• '3;� �•�• -,y 'ANTHONY JOSEPH
NOWAL SKI i
NV EL= 6.26' `Sr\jj �`•a` `: •` `�• 'o / �� /
e ` p
GRAPHIC SCALE �M1 . , a � �'`• � 0
20 6 20 40 60 DI `•.,,n �M1 • ,�0•� . -

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
FIGURE I: Existing Conditions
4Z- —_
/ o^ ° N
b
O
\M1
9 9
N
MHW Line " HIT . p
(2.5' Elevation)
lil O• �' h'� \y�
1yn
JOHN. R. S
LOIS D. JONES
g
/ ^N PG• y�
° EDGE OF EXISTING
MARSH
\.....\ H✓iq ��� ..W�••
jy DJ^'••,' IV)
'1
•\hy
If
N/F
JOHN. N.
DODLEY
w ° y
. T . '�� ny •' b- N w O M1° PROPOSER W/g
EXISTING fl/M
y -
b
9
qy N� HWY 2
_____JL•_________ ti___A__________A.______ lbph _ e `^'.4 y GRAPHIC: SCALE
1 b -_y
EMIST.EOOE OF PAVEMENT

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Figure 2: Proposed Condition
•�b7
• � 1 1 b ,
I NN
u4 bN \y
y � '• \
'Area Disturbed 9 w
\; • ,� Below MHW •'
h b C
MHW Line h N/F ryry '
(2.5' ElevotionIs 9.. E5
) GJ,
yp Ny
Ik Ipl ��V by n• p hb (� u M1,.��,,r_,-•
No
yR
be
,1 ._ bh_ �JO �� 1-A 'Y.� 0 N - b '1M1
. s O' ' : • — b� -�`R y - - t _y a—_-• -- rob q• 4 5R
_.~.-b .. _3ah'� �._85 = .......... EXISTING F/W
_ ..__.....
o
.......... .
h
U b
62
' �nlJ I•
N HWY 4
a- IO- ------- bb
b• i
0
' � EXIST. EDGE of P4YEUENT
Area Disturbed
— Below MHW
Jam. R. f
DUDLEY

r�
py1 Icw.4 l:•e.l ^ i.r. \..,. ;\o _L"a ;;i-I IL\� C ��..} ILi �11:��t- Il ,'t �.IC 6J5�(:
1I/1 a or•- c°°S / FS1nli�w l an. ZQv-e vice'1— (� -, y{r
Gv.,J v-GwY' feSa-i�wi n LOS'`' wo,
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2 105WM)
Figure 3: All Areas Disturbed By Con tion
6 DUB I
q
1•'• 1 fi '. Area Disturbed
b9
Below MHW
4 e -Area Disturbed s �I
Below MHW b �(ws �C4NCST 33 77�
\ tIb"r'••\'1 .' ��1 MHW Line N/F M1• o
1 � I (2.5' Elevation) . EOIS e: o ES
IQ . _ . _ .. ?. bq gbgM1 .•'/`� DOtlLEY
x NY
Areo Disturbed
�l Above MHW
,nI.I 1 q qry.
6 $ b0
tip'. - '•
e ~•,o.�,�J /r.s,� ..'.� -bpi. ... .. �y R/N -�-n�_.
EXIST
/•� - _ 0 ♦ ��� �t3a`J. y..� W6
r .. �.�. —��_bb �x —� •�� 1q • by � ' .... .
O
__-------"---`------'---- q
1 JI � ' -
I: 4 q
m {'-------'-' -------- �m :� bq bq q _ ' ... , N� Hwr _______ a•_________ _________b:______ - M1 _____ ___ 4 IrRX SCALE
t
• i - b- _b- _ _-,eb
b 1• V
0
• « EXIST.EDGE OF PAVENENI

3
LLx9n ttnp r{.lru tlonorsh On Llmtt
(Tie to E5�lihls Side)
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure 3: All Areas Disturbed by Construction
Argq_Dls�/�
�NGI��Vjx'°"
!25' Ele o%nl
C nstruoS1 L1m1ts
(Edge of BreGT oter. Struncture on Thls Side)
Area Disturbed Below MHW
e C/r ng
Br�kwNN� Sfl�uCfu�e
Area DlsturW Below MHW
VA&sh�
(crAelr Ir (tilt lY� 01 YMirlr Sl/¢Ir1
e1e
t
T
11
rAIM1110
YOU=
11
1611K1510
JAMIN
13
16661e1
I461itm
I1
1461220/
U61121e
IS
166A1110
16WUIM
l6
16611A0
344"t
n
161t"M
3164AID
11
11PIepQO
NM.?M
11
11St10
IeQLM

rSe
te:
e table for
ordinates of 4
Elev. _
Elev.
Elev. =
It
2
Existing Elev. = 7. V
Existing Crossection
(Approximate at T-6)
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Breakwater Structure (Typical)
il'Jo1- to Scale)

r�T v'y CF O
i� v ZOU
ccCn ♦♦ru tlon LV
Me to E><Is lnq `ilorsn On 1'hls Side)
a
27 18 3
I Awl r.l' i -T Z iv' £'o' I y Oo �
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure I: Existing Conditions
s
I G.J LIGVVIIVIV
C nstructlI n Llmlts
(Edge of Breo�Crater SVructure on Thl, Sldel
0
-7
r,y ,tr
's
lz� :l

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure 2:.Proposed Conditions
(Al on)
C nsfructl n Llmifs "-''' �`t�
q\ (Edge of Thls Slcel
Area Dlslurbed Below MHW
Match
cwfmla IV TWO, Iw 01 ►I*wlY llmlwa
lelx
1
/
11
11i110
11{eIDW
13MIN
115115112110
1NIIIA?W
u
1511111e1
1unula
II
111769M
INluie
IS
110NLA
344"W
I{
111
1MIR117U
II
I"m
111e
1MeU111
11
11 410
14m.1120
MORG
7Ye111tY1
M1211001

W
��2O
gfr
J
RN
_JQ Yl4l zt
�:l RYPIX.I h-(JY JL l•. `vl .�, �Ow ivl `KV52G1
.?J.pdi
-
,)Af(q i )ocir
C �I.G,✓'G
Lease w�l
SE
MH'N Line
LG (2.5' Elevation)
�ej �trU
I z' '.
\hy
EDGE OF E
MAR!
EIP 00
EXIST, MARSH `
:a a �._._,_._ .-��.._.. _•�w - - - - :\fib.
'� � rye ti -----:5°�`'•,^o
P O
0 ..a .
y.0 ,
IP
�ti • �a : - : �Q. .�.. _ • ;." ' ' °
\ `.' .`_ . • oCI ` ` �' • '�' Spa '°
y' " N
�.i'tea. •,%�br�♦'�!/
1 •w . b ��• 1 _ _a . �. ,4• Xk
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0, 20 40 60
SWANSBORO MITIGATION
SITE (R-2105WM)
FIGURE I: Existing Conditions
o
Oti
b
I V EL = 0.24' %
121
14.1
4q♦� .• NC GRID
— /
- `� . \., •.� �ANTHONY JOSEPH
`��A^� �• KOWALSKI /
O,p R nSfO
e=w-
�
O^ / ?O_
V•.
♦`o�•`♦'•, O;IP\O�
ta•
6• .

J.,011 �'eC6� c/ j^2co �".e.♦ try 0., ST�"'e<,.•� Al-s
EDGE OF EXISTINGMARSH SWANSBORO MITIGATION '
MHW Line EIP 4y
(2.5' Elevation) b^ SITE (R-2 105WM)
Area Disturbed FIGURE 2: Proposed Conditions
Below MHW\\ '�yy EXIST. MARSH`` Oq�
'♦a ti
, b "
° Area Disturbed
Below MHW
a� • ,
by ti 1,2 -iKi• e^
P
0.
` 3 • �•♦y. � �°� - '!Z' ''moo � ^b EIT;,: •`?ryoo r, .
Div' ' �b•� - ` f .•'. ' <y...; " I V f.L= 0.24'
b
!RfV. •�^s°:� '. 2.,`..r�•• NC GRID
`� \ @0. ¢ ,♦ty N/F
.t�`•�. ♦y. : i1` �.. ♦' h •. •, • V. 'y �ANTHONY JOSEPH /
' KOWALSNI
o
\�1' • _ •♦,..,mom ,� / ,�
• Ram" • AGb.� P ♦ O O.
*gyp' � ,^' ��'Q `b •�.oSfo '.`,4,: �-
GRAPHIC SCALE \�'h - `+ • o r°'`• `'' O
\

OCT.-11'01(THU) 13:38 SHELLFISH SANITATION TEL:[phone] P,002
PROHIBITED TERRITORY
WHITE OAK R]*VFR AMA CARTERBT & ONSLOW COUNTY
Area D-3 (Map 35) (Prohibited areas are shaded)
" [r
1 �Ii�i�B1�'TED y
l "A
IY r I r,i n, plTtD
�� AREA
CA
ti p� c►xmi P� ,piTaD
-PROM i B,,p
a gc+a l
'F
�.' is Cr
.e
�RON i'ditFt• '
ARE' o
d
� � See pear Creek Area Prahihi:ad
Island and Gaase
V4r�lfc/�� cnp-,...`O, f•••�•• Creeks De�irtiaa:,
G^'a P�a
O �
Q �� e pOvoq Ptl
mc .
I �Ord
°
Revisions: 2/05/87,
� �
12101188, 9,
7/03/89,
6113/91,
1/96;
3/99
NO PERSON SHALL TAKE pR ATTEMPT TO TAKE ANY OYSTERS, CLAMS OR MUSSELS OR POSSESS, SELL, OR
OFFER FOR SALE ANY OYSTERS, CLAMS OR MUSSELS TAKEN FROM THE FOLLOWING AREAS, AT ANY TIME:
(Description on back of sheet)

IF INCORRECT RETURN TO
Warrant No. 1090173 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CONTROLLER'S OFFICE
Date 11-29-2000
RALEIGH NC 27588-1515
43301
0793 007
INVOICE NUMBER
INVOICE DATE
OR CONTRACT
INVOICE AMOUNT
(-) DISCOUNT
(+) FREIGHT
NET AMOUNT
11-27-2000
475.00
475.00
L
u t 4—
-
MEN"I.
RMANAGp
Dehch stub before deposiUng
TOTAL:
475.00
475.00
Remarks CA14A MAJOR PERMIT & MAJOR 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION; TIP NO. R-2105WM

December 10, 2001
W. D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NC Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore,
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acklowledges receipt of your application for State
approval for the replacement of the breakwater and restoration of coastal marsh at Cedar Point, in
Carteret County. It was received on November 26, 2001, and appears to be adequate for
processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is February 8, 2002. An
additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary to complete the
review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline stated above, you
should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as
your notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on or about the
75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at
the proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along the roadway
where it can be observed from the road. An example would be: nailing the notice card to a
telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way nearthe project. Failure to post this notice could
result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by
the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify
me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing
agencies.
Sincerely,
Bill Arrington,
D.O.T. Field Representative
WLA
Enclosure
cc: Charles Jones
Doug Huggett
Ted Tyndall, District Manager

f
f a
AMA PERMIT
APPLIED FOR
COMMENTS ACCEPTED- THROUGH
APPLICANT:
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT nFFIrFR RPi nInr.

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
November 20, 2001
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Attention: Mr. Bill Arrington
Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Nov 2 d 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Onslow and Carteret Counties, Construction of Swansboro and Cedar
Point Mitigation Sites, TIP No. R-2105WM.
Dear Mr. Arrington:
As you know, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
requested authorization under a CAMA Major Development Permit to construct marsh
sites called Cedar Point and Swansboro. We appreciate the assistance you have provided
on these two projects. The purpose of this letter is to update the permit application, dated
September 7,2001, for Cedar Point and to request that Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) process the permit application for Cedar Point separate from Swansboro.
The NCDOT has reviewed and incorporated comments from a field review
meeting on Cedar Point. Changes can be noted on the attached drawing that is noted as
"Figure 2, Proposed Conditions". The elevation for tidal creek bottom flowing through
the site has been raised to 0.00' elevation as opposed to the original proposed elevation of
—0.65'. In addition, the elevation for the top of the channel is now 1.00' elevation in
place of 0.35' elevation as originally proposed. The rationale behind the raising of the
elevation is due to NCDOT learning from the location of successful elevation (1.00') for
Spartina alterniora at another mitigation site.
The NCDOT has reduced disturbance to the existing marsh by raising the
elevation of the channel bottom to 0.0' elevation. The proposed project will now disturb
2,718 square feet (0.06 acre) of existing marsh, and, of this total disturbance, 801 square
feet (0.018 acre) of existing marsh will be converted to open water. Previous totals were
0.038 acre from conversion to open water, and 0.072 acre disturbed by hand clearing.
Therefore, total available mitigation has been detailed in Table 1.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1546
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBsrm, www..DOH.DOTSTATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

}Table i Spmmary of 1Vhhgafiouat Cedar,Pornt iVIitrgation Srte
�Mrhgafion Type R�
� Species Plan�d_yj
�:yMthgatlon`,Area
(Mr�tgafion Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. altern flora
0.36 acre*
0.18 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.78 acre*
0.39 acre*
""' indicates than 0 AIR — r..
, -,
impacts to ex
The NCDOT asks DCM to process the permit application for Cedar Point at this
time separate from Swansboro. This request is necessary in order to meet NCDOT's
potential construction schedule for the site because there are issues with the Swansboro
project. The time required to resolve these issues will prevent constructing the
Swansboro project this coming spring. Consequently, NCDOT will submit a separate
permit for the Swansboro project if these issues can be resolved, and NCDOT decides to
proceed with the Swansboro project.
The NCDOT also notes that the Section 404 Nationwide Permit 27 issued by the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may need to be modified since the elevations at
Cedar Point project have been raised. The NCDOT asks that the USACE determine if
this modification is necessary.
Once again, the NCDOT appreciates your assistance in processing the CAMA
Major Development Permit for Cedar Point. If you have any questions, please contact
Mr. Phillip Todd of my staff at [phone], Extension 314.
Sincerely,
W. D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Kelly Williams, NCDCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Morehead City
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF, Morehead City

t s
� ' � � Noi �-' F;LOOi
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETr
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
November 20.2000
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Attention: Mr. Bill Arrington
Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Subject: Onslow and Carteret Counties, Construction of Swansboro and Cedar
Point Mitigation Sites, TIP No. R-2105 WM.
Dear Mr. Arrington:
As you know, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
requested authorization under a CAMA Major Development Permit to construct marsh
sites called Cedar Point and Swansboro. We appreciate the assistance you have provided
on these two projects. The purpose of this letter is to update the permit application, dated
September 7,2001, for Cedar Point and to request that Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) process the permit application for Cedar Point separate from Swansboro.
The NCDOT has reviewed and incorporated comments from a field review
meeting on Cedar Point. Changes can be noted on the attached drawing that is noted as
"Figure 2, Proposed Conditions". The elevation for tidal creek bottom flowing through
the site has been raised to 0.00' elevation as opposed to the original proposed elevation of
—0.65'. In addition, the elevation for the top of the channel is now 1.00' elevation in
place of 0.35' elevation as originally proposed. The rationale behind the raising of the
elevation is due to NCDOT learning from the location of successful elevation (1.00') for
Spartina alternii fora at another mitigation site.
The NCDOT asks DCM to process the permit application for Cedar Point at this
time separate from Swansboro. - This request is necessary in order to meet NCDOT's
potential construction schedule for the site because there are issues with the Swansboro
project. The time required to resolve these issues will prevent constructing the
Swansboro project this coming spring. Consequently, NCDOT will submit a separate
permit for the Swansboro project if these issues can be resolved, and NCDOT decides to
proceed with the Swansboro project.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
154E MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WW !DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
i SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

The NCDOT also notes that the Section 404 Nationwide Permit 27 issued by the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may need to be modified since the elevations at
Cedar Point project have been raised. The NCDOT asks that the USACE determine if
this modification is necessary.
Once again, the NCDOT appreciates your assistance in processing the CAMA
Major Development Permit for Cedar Point. If you have any questions, please contact
Mr. Phillip Todd of my staff at [phone], Extension 314.
Sincerely,
19
U
«. D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr.
David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr.
Dave Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Ms.
Kelly Williams, NCDCM, Raleigh
Mr.
John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr.
David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr.
Tom McCartney, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr.
Ron Sechler, NMFS, Morehead City
Mr.
Mike Street, NCDMF, Morehead City

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Arrington
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
DATE: November 15, 2001
1, 0
WA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
tvu _ _ 7pp1
SUBJ: Construction of Swansboro & Cedar Point Mitigation Sites
Tip # R-2105WM / Onslow & Carteret Counties
I have reviewed the comments provided by the District Manager and/or Bio-Supervisor
and concur with their recommendation(s).
Director, Date
Preston P.Pate, Jr.
Deputy Director, Date
Michael G. Buhl
Habitat rotection Section Date
Section Chief,
Michael W. Street
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of ,Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross. Jr., Secretary
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
November 14, 2001
Mr. Bill Arrington
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza H, 151 B, Hwy 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
AM��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
Subject: Construction of Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation Sites,
TIP No. R-2105WM
Dear Mr. Arrington:
This letter provides supplemental comments to our comments covered by the memorandum dated
October 8, 2001 from Mike Street to you. These comments are for the proposed Swansboro
Mitigation Site. The,NCDOT proposes to connect an existing ditch to the White Oak River with
a straight channel. 'A straight ditch create direct flow from the existing stormwater outfall rather
than sheet flow, therefore we recommend that this ditch not be approved. The proposed basin
(plunge pool) for the stormwater outfall should be constructed as proposed, but should not be
connected to the White Oak River.
Sincerely,
" 2A'r'`'/.
James Patrick Monaghan, Jr.
Supervisory Biologist
W
5 200i
uITK
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

p � Gs Qosi�
7 bA-
1e NeecC C�rc�'� ��a+s
a Je- ea`K cki'(a 5
31.E n-A'QSs 5 oK}E+ LJ41�r—
� U
&;3C-4wp C�3{ormww
5. Dfcti w.JCA c(ose 4a (d-�kVJ4/
b\awp�

Cq L'J� �ui �"
q i5 7 3 3 7 9 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ex• 31
EPARTMENT OF T`AR NSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 03 ,C.)RSS�r�'-J-rrm— r LYNDOTIPPETT
GOVERNOR SIk- SECRETARY
September 7, 2001
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Attention: Bill Arrington
Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Subject: Onslow and Carteret Counties, Construction of Swansboro and Cedar
Point Mitigation Sites, TIP No. R-2105WM.
Dear Mr. Arrington:
As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to construct tidal marsh adjacent to NC 24 in Swansboro and Cedar Point. The
NCDOT submitted a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development
Permit in a letter dated November 9, 2000. In December 15, 2000, Mr. Phillip Todd of
my staff met with Ms. Tere Barrett of Division of Coastal Management to discuss the
permit application. Ms. Barrett described how the permit application was incomplete.
The purpose of this letter is to provide additional information to DCM in order for the
permit application to be processed.
Ms. Barrett said that plat maps of parcels would be needed. These maps have
been attached and provided with this letter.
The NCDOT has also produced maps showing the existing conditions, proposed
conditions, and areas disturbed by construction. These maps are for both Swansboro and
Cedar Point Sites. Additionally, a cross section of the existing breakwater structure that
is eroding has been included with the maps per a request of Ms. Barrett.
Ms. Barrett asked that NCDOT provide standard CAMA application information
for each site. A revised standard application has been attached to this letter.
As you aware, the NCDOT has already contacted adjacent landowners about its
CAMA permit application. A copy of green cards was provided to Ms. Tere Barrett in a
letter dated December 20, 2000.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WUVI1NGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WINW.DORDOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Mr. John Hennessy of N. C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) noted in an
email that additional copies of the mitigation planning documents were needed per
NCDWQ's rules. These additional copies will be provided with this supplemental
information for the CAMA permit application.
We appreciate DCM's assistance with this permit application. If additional
information about either mitigation area is needed, please contact Mr. Phillip Todd of my
staff at [phone], Extension 314.
Sincerely,
1� W. D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
b Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Kelly Williams, NCDCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. Tom McCartney, U.SFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Morehead City
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF, Morehead City

Field Investigation Information
�S x // z,Pi8A
1. Applicant's Name:
Agents name:
2. Location of Project site:
Photo Index -
State plane coordinates x: y:
3. Investigation type: Ma,39r-
4. Investigative Procedure: Date of site visit - /ar/co/
Was applicant present - A10 Name — T_ Q
5. Processing procedure: Date application receiv d — / //u/ f �l
Office: Kta"L
6. Site Description: County: Cad �-Ye I
Community: C2cQa✓
Principal uses of surrounding land: Co,w� e vc ti �� O� ��i' `�a k Sov Uc�
Water bodies (with widths and depths): wC_Lie Ce k� oe✓
C�-/Ood _2
Are they coastal waters? Ye S
Buffer Rules? /J'e //
Drains to: Bojc4-Co,,.d( f6c� Watershed: 00
}� Soil description in area:
W Local land use plan —
*J' Land classification from LUP
AEC's Involved PT/ C S, CGu� U-)
Water dependent )�s
Intended use -r -aA5
Waste water Treatment Existing rV
Waste water Treatment Planned AM
Type structures existing , K C
Type structures planned C, W r if T +450
Annual rate of erosion NA

03/01/99 1
e[
1 STATE PROJECT: 6.169005T
61nR (f $527.Uo
N Cp�OUHA I I. D. NO.: R-2105WH
pp ii s Neal Eslax Q / 7
Excise raI I 1 D ZS/ �1%10 /
1 PARCEL NO 905
1
Exeiae Tax 05a�'•OO I Recording Tim Book and Page
Tax Lot No. Parcel Identifier No. 33b41(p349413
Verified by County on the day of , 19
� �id4 e .�aL/'a�. /iit
Nail after recording to Albert E. Joyner, Division Right of Nay Agent NC Depaxtment
of Transportation 105 Eastbrobk Drive, Greenville, NC 27050
This instrument was prepared by Hert M. NhiYehurat, Ai ht of Nay Agent
_ NC Department of Tranep t L•i
Brief description fox the Index: Property described in Deed Book 217 Page 121 Carteret
County Registry.
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this / day of�, 19_H, by and between
GRANTOR I GRANTEE
I
JOHN R. JONES AND WIFE I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
I
LOIS B. JONES I AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
I
1019 CEDAR POINT BLVD. I 105 EASTBROOH DRIVE
I
SWANSBORO, NC 29584 I GREENVILLE, NC 27859
I
Enter in appropriate block for each party: n"me,'address, and, if appropriate, character of
entity e.q, corporation or partnezahip.
The deaignation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter
an required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration of ✓!,16 J, 300.f0 paid by the
Grantee, the receipt of which in hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents doe" grant,
bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee ainple, all that certain lot or parcel of
land situated WHITEOAKTownship, CARTERET County, North Carolina and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point, said point being the northwest comes of the of the present
Wethington Lot No. 193 according to a map of the Ceder Point Subdivision by Phillip K.
Ball in June 1936, and running thence North 56 degrees-17fEast 940 feet to a point,
thence North 33 degrees-438West to the main channel of White Oak River and with the
main channel of White Oak River in a southwesterly direction to the State Highway
bridge right of way and thence South 33 degrees-43' East with the State right of way
to the point of beginning and including Lots No. 191 and 192 of the John S. Jones
Subdivision.
The above lands are part of a conveyance of lands made by the Absolute Lord
Proprieto4" to Captain Thomas Lee, by instrument dated, January 21n`, 1713, the n
Said Thomas Lee being an ancestor of the present grantor. The original grant �C
being recorded in both Craven County Registry, and the Carteret County Registry.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in
.I)_f6b ROOM 1:'7 IA6C- /1/ 0.41c7-EQE7 ruvnny AFC/17Rg
NC Bar Assoc. Form No. 3 1976

. sap showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book 1 , page 113 .
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenance,
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is -sized of the premines in fee
simple, has the right to convey the ease in fee simple, that title is marketable and free
and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant anddefend the title against
the lawful claim- of -11 persons whomsoever except for the exception. hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is nobject to the following exceptions. None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set their hands and seals, or if corporate, has
caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officer.
and its anal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year.
first above written.
I? - (SEAL)
JOHN R. JOHE�9�%
(SEAL)
LOIS B. JONES
(SEAL)
SEAL -STAMP NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF
Notary Public of said county do hereby
{'"`mil •`"bi,ri certify that John R. Jones and wife, Lois B. Jones
GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of
i'.��', the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or noel,
'•� this�day of
'.:si/�-�i!- ;Y�:,:•Y My Commission expires:
.i... .... p+'`; d,.. .: ,D•U-3D-1Li7I NOTARY ,PUBLIC �G=--
'he foregoing Certificate(s;
_n/are certified to be corm
=he data and time_and in thr
Post -it -Fax Note 7671
Datei/
pages
To
0,��_F
From /Z/
Jar / rr.,
Co./Dept. 0z %
Co. ilC
)
Phone #
Phone #
Fax #
Fax #
rr�ns
Foram
o o.rw
owm�
O
.C. Has Assoc. Form No. 3 1976
oommm
�
AO 9
„fJ 'r
N\nM
NORTH CAROLINA, CARTERET COUNTY
JrFC
The foregoing certificates) of Notary Public(s) is/are
certified to be correct. This Instrument and this
certificate are duly registered at the dale and time
.am
e
and in the Book and Page shown on the first page
hereof,
m
Arih;r,R i er (Deeds
-iR
w 1
vey
e �0o
m .-
—elanie
o
nAsour..esns ma
moo
0 om
�..m
onN
NON 9
! at
by 7

ANA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., S kreta�
q�
August 8, 2002
V. Charles Bruton
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
N.C. Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Bruton:
As discussed at the March 2002 annual mitigation monitoring report meeting, the N.C. Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) concurs with the N.C. Department of Transportation's (DOT'S)
request to close out the following mitigation site:
• Bogue Sound (Weeks Property) Mitigation Site, Carteret County.
This site provides mitigation for the following NCDOT projects: (1) TIP No. R-2105AA, CAMA
Permit No. 52-00; (2) TIP No. R-2105AB, CAMA Permit No. 146-96; (3) TIP No. B-1098, CAMA
Permit No. 21-92; (4) Bridge No. 86 over Culley Creek on SR 1316, CAMA Permit No. 38-95; and
(5) Bridge No. 3 over Back Creek on SR 1300, CAMA Permit No. 133-95.
DCM is pleased that this site has met its goals and success criteria. We appreciate DOT'S attention
to DCM's comments and suggestions during the phases of planning, implementation and
monitoring.
Sincerely,
Doug Huggett
Major Permits and Consistency Coordinator
CC: Mike Bell, USACE
Scott McLendon, USACE
Randy Griffin, NCDOT
Kelly Williams, DCM
John Hennessy, DWQ
Tere Barrett, DCM
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: httpJ/dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled \ 10°A Post Consumer Paper

FEB, -12' 02 (TUE) 11:48 UEHNR COSTAL MGM'I' I11ba I17 IJJ, 147J „ V V.
Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
for
X Major Development in an Area of Frivironmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
% Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113.229
Permit Number
19.02
Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1549
Authorizing development in�C 1Te1et County at Adj_Wbite Oak River, at the northeast corner of
the bridge from Cedar Point to Swansboro as requested in the permittee's application dot^a 9/7/01_;nel,kupplernintal
letter dated 11/20/01 and the attached workalan drawings (7): 5 dated as received on 9/28/01. and 2 dated 11/19/01.
This permit, issued on ZItZ102 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), ell applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
:Cedar Point Mitigation Site
1) This permit does not conveyor imply approval of the suitability of this property for compensatory
wetland mitigation for any particular project. The use of any portion of this site as compensatory
mitigation for future projects will be determined on a case -by -case basis during the CAMA permit
review and consistency process,
.2) The permittee shall conduct a wetland delineation to determine the amount of low marsh and the amount
of high marsh currently on the site prior to the initiation of construction and once again after the site has
achieved its hydrologic and vegetative success criteria. The results of these wetland delineations shall
be submitted to DCM for approval.
'(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the perminee or Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DBNR and the
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
data. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be. _
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance,
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must case when the permit expires on
December 31, 2005
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your projeet is consistent with the North Caroline Coastal
Managenrwtt Program.
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and Its conditions are hereby 600eptad.
Sigriatrue of Permittee

(-
FFT, -12' 02 (TUE) 11:48 ➢EHNR COSTAL MGMT
TEL:[phone] P. 003
Page 2 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) Mitigation or other remedial actions may be required for permanent impacts to coastal wetlands if the
mitigation site fails to meet its hydrologic and vegetative success criteria within 5 years of project
construction.
4) Mitigation or other remedial actions may be required for temporarllyimpacted coastal wetlands that
have not reattained jurisdictional wetland status within 3 years of project construction.
5) The permittee shall minimize the need to cross wetlands in transporting equipment to the maximum
extent practicable. Mats will be used when crossing wetlands to minimize temporary wetland impacts.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) will not require mitigation for the
approximately .237 acres of shallow bottom'habitat.that is being filled to construct the project
6) The temporary placement.or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated
wetlands is not authorized. This condition also applies to removal of the existing breakwater.
7) No excavation of shallow water bottom or any wetlands is authorized by this permit, except as depicted
on the attached workplan drawings,
8) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters,
outside of the areas indicated on the attached workplan drawings.
9) All fill material must be clean and free of any pollutants, except in trace quantities.
10) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of regularly or irregularly
flooded vegetated wetlands behind adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of
solids into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters, except for those areas where the excavated
materials will be used as substrate for marsh restoration as described in the attached permit application.
Construction of the tidal channel
11) Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent short term and long term erosion of the side slopes of the
tidal channel.
12) The tidal channel bank will be at approximately 1.0 feet elevation, and the bottom of the tidal channel
will be at approximately 0.00 feet elevation. Excavation of the tidal channel shall notaxceed
approximately 0.00 elevation.
Construction of the Breakwater Structure
13) The existing deteriorating offshore breakwater fill shall be removed in its entirety, including the
associated manmade debris (wood, tires, fiberglass panels and concrete rubble.)
14) The authorized alignment of the proposed breakwater structure must be staked by a representative of
DCM within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of any construction.
15) The new breakwater structure must be completely constructed prior to the commencement of excavation
and grading behind the breakwater.

FEZ,-12'02(TUE) 11:49 DEHNR COSTAL MGMT TEL:[phone] P.004
Page 3 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
16) No backfill of the breakwater or any other filling of wetlands, estuarine waters or public trust areas is
authorized by this permit, except as depicted on the attached workplan drawings.
17) The height of the permitted breakwater shall not exceed six inches above mean high water or the normal
water level.
19) Placement of the rock breakwater shall be limited to the areas as depicted on the attached workplan
drawings, The breakwater rock must be clean and free froin loose dirt or any pollutant except in trace
quantities. It must be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current
action.
19) The breakwater shall be marked at 50 foot intervals with yellow reflectors extending at least three feet
above mean high water.
20) The permittee shall maintain the breakwater in good condition and in conformance with the terms and
conditions of this permit or the remaining breakwater structure shall be removed within 90 days of
notification from DCM.
NOTE: The permittee and/or his contractor is strongly encouraged to contact a representative of the
North Carolina Coastal Federation at [phone] to discuss the breakwater structure design
,prior to project initiation.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
21) This project is in a High Quality Water Zone and must comply with the Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds, 15A NCAC 4B .0124,
22) This project must conform to all requirements of the NC Sedimentation P6Hudon Control Act and NC
DOT's Memorandum of Agreement with the DIvision of Land Resources.
23) Immediately prior to the initiation of construction, the permittee shall install turbidity curtains in the
water area immediately adjacent to the mitigation site, including the existing and proposed breakwater
structure. The turbidity curtains are to be properly maintained and retained in the water until
construction is complete. The turbidity curtains shall be removed when turbidity within the curtains
reaches ambient levels.
24) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction must not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
25) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures must be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses and property (e.g. silt fence,
diversion awales or berms, sand fence, etc,).
Use of Cedar Point Mitigation 91te as mitieation for future project impacts
26) The final mitigation credits generated at this site will be determined by the difference between the
results of the pre and post -construction wetland delineations required by Condition No. 2 of this CAMA
Permit-

I
FEji. -12' 02 (TUE) 11 :49 DEHNR COSTAL MGMT TEL:[phone] P. 005
apartment a Trane�p rtatlon Pormlt 1i19-02
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
27) If thissite is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts, written concurrence must be obtained
from DCM, the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ), the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF)
and the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) that post -construction monitoring demonstrates
that hydrologic and vegetative success criteria have been met. Although annual monitoring reports to
DCM, DWQ, DMF and WRC will not be required, hydrologic and vegetative monitoring data shall be
made available to review agencies at such time as the site is proposed for use as mitigation.
NOTE: Mitigation credit for marsh restoration will not be allowed for the footprint of the new -
breakwater structure.
NOTE: If this site is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts, the permittee should revise the
Cedar Point Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Planning Report currently dated November 2000.
The revised report should include the final approved site plan as described in the permit
application package dated 9/7/Ol, including the supplemental letter dated 11120/01, and the
attached workplan drawings (7): 5 dated as received on 9/28/01, and 2 dated 11/19/01. The
Cedar point mitigation site final Mitigation Planning Report should also be revised to Include
any conditions of this CAMA permit and should also include an as -built report.
If this site is to be used as mitigation for future project impacts, the entire mitigation site of
approximately 14.34 acres covered by this permit shall be protected in perpetuity in its restored
state according to the approved final mitigation plan and shall be owned by the pormittee or Its
Approved designee. An appropriate conservation easement, deed restriction or other appropriate
instrument shall be attached to the title for the subject property and a copy of such provided to
ACM.
NOTE: It is strongly recommended that the perinittee monitor reference areas or biological benchmarks
concurrently with the mitigation area in order to provide adequate data to determine success.
General
28) No attempt will be made by the permittee to prevent the free and full use by the public of all navigable
waters adjacent to the authorized work. The permitted activity must not interfere with the public's right
to free navigation on, all navigable waters of the United States.
29) The authorized activity will not cause an unacceptable interference with navigation.
30) The N.C. Division of Water Quality has authorized the proposed project under General Water Quality
Certification No. 3274 (DWQ Project No. 01-1850), which was issued on 1/14/02. Any violation of this
General Water Quality Certification will be considered a violation of this CAMA permit.
MOM This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional permits, approvals or
authorizations that may be required:
NOTEt The U.S. Army Corps of Fsngineers (Corps) authorized the proposed project under Nationwide
Permit No. 27 (Action ID Number 200100396) which was issued on 1/29/02,
NOTE: The permittee is encouraged to contact the Public health Pest Management Section at (919) 733-
6407 to discuss mosquito control measures.

Re: G-Mar Point, confirmation of delineation
Subject: Re: Cedar Point, confirmation of delineation
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:28:09 -0500
From: Bill Arrington <[e-mail]>
To: Phillip Todd <[e-mail]>
Hi Phillip,
Thanks for meeting with me last week. Your maps of the wetlands look
good. I concurr that the wetland delineation is correct. Thanks for
getting it done before work on the mitigation site began. I think these
maps will save future communication.
Have a good Easter weekend,
Bill
Phillip Todd wrote:
>Bill:
>1 wanted to write and affirm what we discussed last Fri, March 22
>at Cedar Point. The delineation located using GPS looked good,
>and DCM is okay with the delineation.
>Thanks.
>Phillip
1 of 1 4/12/02 1:28

Fax:[phone]
Mar 4 '02 16:10 P.03

L�UAK tJUIIN -4 = IMI I I.UN .i.iwry 31. i
DELINEATION 2/15/02
I 4 OPEN WATER
ro r

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Figure 3: All Areas Disturbed By Construction
b1
,
2�po °Y
ti
MHW Line
Area Disturbed
.r (2.5' Elevati ;°
Below MHW
JOHN. N. 6
•:
••, .0 LOTS S. JONES
Area Disturbed
R
: '• '
, ,
Below MHW o
r
O........ °. ' �°CM1'
!
NO
OIOLEY
Y♦ b �q
l3♦,
^'
I
°
.. '9 _.. ._
✓ _
Aron Me+I Inc��
MOW
Owl
I
ago
•ate
11�11111�_��
• • • •
• 1

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
Figure 2: Proposed Condition-c
,k _
cF'1b
.1
w, a"
o
y\\ e
., { ,•Area Disturbed
`'• j Below MHW
• b ph/ / `O
by, MHW Line a N/P
b 'Y (2.5' Elevation) LOS B.JONE5
o
411,
.
^b
4s
ep1
Area Disturbed
— Below MHW
N. B.
(� l
UDL DBOLEY
-14 • :/ a ._mob• �5 R•- .. .r. _-. , _.
-,
- , _ -
a - - - - -1J� HWYORAPK SCALE
2q
N N
N b 4
O
O
EXIST. EDGE Of PwENENi

i VIe� �` tasf 80' o� e �� eGt w ' eX i ti YUa+�ik f SNcEI low
ek CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2 1O5WM)
Figure 3: All Areas Disturbed By Conction
lb 40 \
y` ^1
b�•' , "Area:' Disturbed a a
•' Below MHW
b`','•'' MHW Line M1�
N/F
/1 / JOHN. R. 6
\c (2.5' Elevation / LOIS B. JONES
61
I • 1\ p aM1
is ��i �� �1•• �, x o.. d,4.,Y,.
,041
1
k i •1 O l " y° �b
g
bb
0
0
ZQ ro ©u
J
Z
Area Disturbed
Below MHW
34 '�N 33 m
N/F
JOHN. R.
DODLEY
Area Disturbed
Above MHW
RbOYO III
2
r
`-`-immr
----------
-
-------1'
t� a....--"""-"N�
HWY 2�4
EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT

C n tru Lion Imit5
(Tie to Ci9sginq ri/or sn on Thls Side)
C nstructl n Limits
(Eage of BreoC or
S�ruOurs, on This Slaei
Area Disturbed Below MHW
CRAPWC SCALE
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure 3: All Areos Disturbed by Construction
Breoe.ad IIrdlKNre
Area Disturbed Below MHW

Note:
See table for
coordinates of It
Elev. = 2.5'
Elev. = 0.35'
Elev. _ - I. 15'—
Class 1 Rlprop
It
Backfill
Filter Fabric
E
Existing Elev. = T. 1'
Existing Crossection
(Approximate,at T-6)
1.0'
Elev. = 2.0'
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE
Breakwater Structure
Match existing ,
wetland elevotion
(R-2 105WM)
(Typical)
(foot to Scale)

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure 2: Proposed Conditions
_e
�r
ii
—����0�- � � i=mod►
C nstructlI Llmits
(Edge of Or ,ter S�runcture on This Side)
Area Dlsfurbed Below MHW
11
Match
(py}ytr Is 4Mt lH al b•/iwly SNucIV•
MI
•
I
SeSg1ASM0
II1Il?S1Ii
FAIeSM."
3
756463M
INISIAIN
Ag
MIU1.
IS
156"All)
)
756r"0
SIM"
7il"m
*m
11
7AlIp
IM
SM4.Ig0
YW
IS
M )
7SSMUSM
MGStl00

r4ofel<;�t.13W (060 z� IS 3
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE (R-2105WM)
BREAKWATER STRUCTURE AREA
Figure I: Existing Conditions
Match Use
-------------
/ Ca9n ruraornsn"O'n nis loelcne - -
A -- i ,
=4"Elevoionl
(Edge of BreoQcw
ConsiructiatarSg ructulr'e on This Side)
GRAPHIC SCALE .� . A-�
' N
3

NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Mar 4 '02 16:09
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DFPA RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
F. EASLEY
AX: EQVER. S'HEE
P. 01
LYkW TWPErr
SECAETAtY
PROJECT DEVE [?PMENT-&.IRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
ORANCH
ATE:
fTTM12FL2 rAT.T.TT*1r.
TI1MER OF PAGES: I 3:
lease Deliver the Following F>ages'to
Name:
Department orWitin ' ,':..
Address or Room NupTile'r.:. .
his fax being sent by: j
Name:
Phone Number: q lq' 3 3I
NOTES. '
rPOL Mai• .,.4'`l . : N ;2 3o�a1,
. TwpmdNEi AW733.3141 LOCAT":
MAIUNG ADDRESS: FAY:^9/9L7319784 TRANmRTATION WLDINO.
NC DEP/ZTMENT OFTNANSCNTATICN ,. 1 S0yTMW6LUNGTCNSTAW
PPPIlLTCII LOPMCMTN+6EnY1RONMCMIKAIWT 6 . Fl m m
T6eE Mai sewca C6NTE11 I Maws, www.170N.D6rsrAIE.NC.W
RALEIOM NC 27699.1648

Re: Cedar Point, meeting permit condition #2
Subject: Re: Cedar Point, meeting permit condition #2
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:34:48 -0500
From: Bifl Arrington <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Phillip Todd <[e-mail]>
Phillip,
I returned to the office today and received your e-mail. I'm sorry I
couldn't get back to you sooner.
It sounds like you have the data you need to establish the existing
Coastal Marsh areas. We will not require this to be submitted at this
time. It will be needed in the future when you request mitigation
credits for coastal marsh. At that time we will use this info. to
compare with the marsh at the site, to determine the net gain of coastal
marsh.
Please call if you have any othef concerns or questions. If I am not in
the office you can contact me on my cell -phone at 252-528-0019.
Thanks,
Bill
Phillip Todd wrote:
> I delineated the site last Fri afternoon (Feb 15). I GPSed the
> coordinates; in what format should the data be presented to DCM?
> Please advise about how NCDOT can meet this permit condition
> without, several interations. Thanks.
1 of 1 2/26/02 9:03 AM

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200100396 TIP No. R-2105WM State Project No. County: Onslow
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Address: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager j
Project Development and Environmental Analysis �I�j II
1548 Mail Service Center I,1
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 I 1 FEB 1 2002
Telephone Number: [phone], extension 307
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): On the northeast side of , iC 24, at the
south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River, Swansboro, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Description of Activity: Construction of the Cedar Point Mitigation Site as described in NCDOT letter dated
November 9, 2000 and "Final Mitigation Planning Report" dated November 2000 and NCDOT letter dated
November 20, 2001 permanently impacting 0.06 ac of wetlands (smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora)) and
converson of existing 0.018 acres of existing marsh (Spartina altemiflora) to open water. Construction of the Cedar
Point Mitigation Site will result in a net total of 0.78 (after compensatory mitigation) ac of restored coastal marsh
including 0.36 ac of smooth cordgrass (Spartina altemiflora) and 0.42 ac of sahmeadow (Spartina patens). This
verification supercedes the April 12, 2001 verification for this project.
Applicable Law: 2 Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344)
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899)
Authorization: 27 Nationwide Permit Number
_Regional General Permit Number
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (kGP) or Nationwide (NWP) Permit provided it is accomplished
in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404
(if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you roust also receive a Section 401 water quality
certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, telephone [phone]. For any activity
within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work you roust contact the N.C. Division of Coastal
Management, telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions
of the RGP or NWP referenced above may subject the permittee,to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or
appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain
any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The pemmittee may need to contact appropriate State
and local agencies before beginning work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the RGP or NWP, please contact
please contact Dave Timpy at tel hone number [phone].
Date January 29, 2002 ;4
Corps Regulatory Official Telephone No. [phone]
Expiration Date of Verification March 18, 2002
Note: When the nationwide permit authorization expires. activities which have commenced or are tinder contract
to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit will remain authorized This is nrovided the activity is
completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permies exiairation, modification or revocation.
C=`, FHWA, NCDENR-Division of Water Quality, NMFS, NCWRC, NCDOT Division 6.

JA cs B. HuNT JR.
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
November 9, 2000
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Attention: Ms. Tere Barrett
DEC 0 7 2000
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Onslow and Carteret Counties, Construction of Swansboro and Cedar
Point Mitigation Sites, TIP No. R-2105WM.
Dear Ms. Barrett:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct the Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation Sites in Onslow and Carteret
Counties. These two sites are located adjacent to NC 24. The NCDOT seeks
authorization under a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development
Permit to construct these two mitigation sites. The NCDOT believes that all questions
related to the project have been resolved and desires to commence project construction as
soon as possible.
Project Purpose
The NCDOT plans to construct these two marsh sites as "up front" compensatory
mitigation for future transportation related projects to marsh and essential fish habitat in
White Oak River Basin. Currently, there is no designated road project requiring
compensatory mitigation generated by these projects. The NCDOT understands that
there are "risks" involved in constructing these two mitigation sites since there are not
any designated mitigation "needs" at this time.
Project Description: Cedar Point Mitigation Site
The Cedar Point Mitigation Site is located on the northeast side of NC 24, at the
south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River (Figure 1). The site totals 14.34
acres which includes an upland peninsula, 1.07 acres of upland adjacent to NC 24, and
12.92 acres of an existing tidal marsh community.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WWINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27599-1548 WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH, NC

DEC 0 7 2000
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restor ti n of low
marsh. The project design includes 1) excavating uplands to appropriate ele ti@f�'A AGEME
establishment of low tidal marsh, 2) constructing a breakwater structure and BEHEAD
channel to provide tidal exchange throughout the mitigation area and insure long-term
success.
Impacts to existing marsh have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.038 acre from conversion to open water,
and 0.072 acre will be disturbed by hand clearing. The NCDOT will mitigate for
conversion to open water on -site (1:1 ratio), and does not intend to mitigate for areas
impacted by hand clearing. The potential mitigation credit for future NCDOT projects
totals 0.76 acre, or 0.38 acre of credit based on a 2:1 mitigation ratio.
A final mitigation planning document has been attached to this letter and is dated
November 2000. This document replaces the previously provided document dated July
2000. Figures 2, 3 and 4 of the final document are design plans for the mitigation site.
Project Description: Swansboro Mitigation Site
The Swansboro Mitigation Site is located on the White Oak River, just north of
the intersection of Elm Street and NC 24. The site totals 0.63 acre that includes 0.16 acre
of existing marsh fringing the high ground.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low
marsh. The proposed design plan involves lowering the grade at the site to restore low
and high marsh, constructing a channel through the site, and constructing a plunge pool at
a stormwater outfall discharging from NC 24. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.012
acre from the conversion of marsh to open water, and 0.028 acre impacted will be
disturbed by hand clearing. This impact associated with conversion to open water will be
"deducted" from mitigation credit generated by site construction; therefore, potential
mitigation credit for future NCDOT projects totals 0.32 acre, or 0.16 acre of credit based
on a 2:1 mitigation ratio.
A final mitigation planning document has been attached to this letter and is dated
November 2000. This document replaces the previously provided document dated July
2000. Figures 2 and 3 of the final document are design plans for the mitigation site.
History of Mitigation Projects and Changes in Planning Reports
In August 1999, the NCDOT provided conceptual mitigation planning reports
dated July 1999 for comments to the following resources agencies: North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM), U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (UWFWS) and North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF).
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 2 of 5

DEC 0 7 2000
In a letter dated September 2, 1999, NCDMF provided written response o ie
conceptual mitigation planning reports dated July 1999. The NCDMF visited S L MANAGEME
had no objection to the project. A copy of the letter is attached with this permit MOREHEAD
application letter.
In separate letters dated September 7, 1999, NCDCM provided two comments on
the, Cedar Point Marsh Mitigation Site and Swansboro Mitigation Site, Concept Reports
dated July 1999. These letters contained the same comments and are addressed together.
The first comment involved the use of the term "creation" in the report and
mitigation ratios. The term "creation" in the July 1999 was not used with respect to
mitigation credits but referred to construction of the site. It is NCDOT" opinion that each
site has been previously filled and considers each site to generate "restoration" credits.
The terminology has been "correctly" applied in both final reports dated November 2000.
The second comment dealt with monitoring hydrology. The report dated July
1999 stated that monitoring of hydrology would occur for one year. The NCDCM stated
that this is not acceptable and recommended a minimum of three years. This comment
has been incorporated into the final mitigation documents for both sites dated November
2000.
Agency representatives from NCDOT, NCDCM, USACE, NCDWQ, NCWRC,
USFWS and NMFS met at mitigation site on October 27, 1999. The mitigation concepts
presented in the reports dated July 1999 were discussed.
At Swansboro Mitigation Site, three changes have been made based on the site
review. First, the forebay has been replaced with a plunge pool. This change has been
noted in the final report for the site dated November 2000.
The second change involves the open channel. The open channel in the July 1999
report proposed connecting the proposed forebay and White Oak River. In the final
report dated November 2000, the open channel now extends through the mitigation site
from White Oak River. Figure 2 of the report depicts the channel's location.
The third change deals with the depth of the proposed open channel. Originally,
the channel was to be 2 feet deep. The proposed channel is now 1 foot deep as depicted
on Figure 2 of the November 2000 report.
At Cedar Point Mitigation Site, two changes have been made. First, the proposed
open channel is now 1 foot deep as opposed to 2 feet in the July 1999 document. This is
depicted in Figure 2 of the November 2000 report.
The second change involves the proposed construction of a breakwater. This
breakwater would replace the existing peninsula that is currently being eroded and
protects the existing marsh community to the east. Mr. Ron Sechler ofNMFS provided
this suggestion at the October 1999 meeting. Literature from the Coastal Federation was
obtained to design the breakwater. The NCDOT plans to construct the proposed
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 3 of 5

breakwater between the existing peninsula and White Oak River, to remove the existing
peninsula and to plant low marsh after the peninsula is removed. The proposed
construction of the breakwater has been included in the final report dated N n
as text and depiction (Figure 3). M
Mitigation Credits
DEC 0 7 2000
These two mitigation sites together will generate 0.31 acre of low m sH)OASTAL Mi
restoration credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio) and 0.23 acre of high marsh re MORE
credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio). These totals include the amount deducted for
conversion of open water from existing marsh during project construction. These credits
will be applied to future impacts to marsh and EFH.
Table 1 summarizes mitigation credits per mitigation community type at Cedar
Point Mitigation Site.
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Cedar Point Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alternii fora
0.34 acre*
0.17 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.76 acre*
0.38 acre*
"*" indicates that 0.038 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been subtracted from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Table 2 summarizes mitigation credits per mitigation community type at
Swansboro Mitigation Site.
Table 2. Summary of Mitigation at Swansboro Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alterniflora
0.28 acre*
0.14 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.04 acre
0.02 acre
Totals
0.32 acre*
0.16 acre*
"*" indicates that 0.012`acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been debited from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Summary of Permit Application
The NCDOT proposes to construct these two mitigation sites under a single
CAMA Major Development Permit. The pertinent CAMA applications forms (MP-1,
MP-2 and MP-6) and permit drawings for both proposed marsh mitigation sites are
attached to this cover letter as well as the fee for processing the permit application. The
NCDOT will forward certification forms that it has contacted adjacent property owners of
this project's actions. Application is also made for 401 Water Quality Certification from
NCDWQ.
The NCDOT believes that a Section 404 General Permit 291 is applicable for
constructing these mitigation sites. Application is therefore made this permit too.
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 4 of

Final mitigation planning documents for Cedar Point Mitigation Site and
Swansboro Mitigation Site (dated November 2000) are attached to this CAMA Major
Development permit application. Design plans for the sites have been included; Figures
2, 3 and 4 for Cedar Point and Figures 2 and 3 for Swansboro. These do
the reports dated July 1999 and include comments from resource agencierD
n
this cover letter.
C 0 7 2000
These two mitigation sites together will generate 0.31 acre of low m sh
restoration credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio) and 0.23 acre of high mars r N �+A
credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio). These totals include the amount deduc e
conversion of open water from existing marsh during project construction. These credits
will be applied to future impacts to marsh and EFH.
Thank you for your assistance in processing this permit application. We believe
that all issues have been resolved and hope to begin construction of this project soon. If
you have questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Phillip Todd at
[phone], Extension 314.
Sincerely,
W. D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
GGGG Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Kelly Williams, NCDCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Morehead City
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF, Morehead City
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 5 of 5

Form DCM-M1'-1
APPLICATIONRr"adFH„a:
t
(To be completed by all applicants) EC 0 7 Z000
ASTAL MANAGEMENT
b. City, town, community o EHEAD
1. APPLICANT
c. Street address or secondary road number
tx, a*
a. Landowner:
Name N.C• �cT�tNr cF 1¢ar.tYotJrpTi d• Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Y Yes No
Address t5v(e t4kL+ CINML e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
City VNt-ti'4.44- State T4Cd creek, sound, bay) WVA'M OI%L Q,hie2-
Zipa-+�M'I"SbayPhoneC119):'33 31*1
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City
Zip Day Phone
Fax
State
c. Project name (if any) �"atoSW M
No7E perndt wiR be issued in name of k dow (t), and/or
project name.
1. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County 0�1SbGW
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
CANgtWLr wri&ATVoW SVM-q
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NEW t%*ZK•
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? G
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
C WSrrWCC w►hi a.s ►J %i -MS V'ot-.
Revised 03195

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
SA"Scr o
a. Size of entire tract CfewL Sgc4%3r
b. Size of individual lot(s) tO/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract ecwa ga". &Z-AWSS
f. Man-made features now on tract WOT,
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (womb the tonal land use p1mi )
Conservation
Developed
Rural
_ X Transitional
Community
Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
I�cStp4wlttQV � C.AMMRlt-GiAt.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes X No
(Anach zoning wor4ance crnifinue, ifappUcable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? X Yes No
If yes, by whom? veer
-rW tt E-aQT 16y w�ccssr gQr�eAot,eG:tiT
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? 2 Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Annch docamenta+ian, if available)
m. Describe existing vlastE w6my"Mmlitles.
NIA
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
:FQLV CT. Raft AVOW 4L4444i1 &L AW
SAXV4%00ge SAt
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
WA
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I1" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name eceeer A. tA%&tcu3S
Address Qto 0=AP46*S SVZMr
Phone $2AUFQ'r', ►JC- Q85110
Name C r4 GF &Obt,& i0e¢ 0 Tcu*J tkw
Address P.Q. t k. 3taS
Phone GWA"Selc o IN(, Q85B/,�
Name -�Cytto W. G �s_ _
Address T'D bJ
Phone�•
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Ad (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
DEC 0 7 2000
6. CERTIFICA
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained iz the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the _3� day of 1*4 , 1#12na
Print Name \iJiu.i hm t> • 6-1i�,Qm p' F
Signature 'Y / C, ../�/, I,., %)' �1,-_e
t�da r or Authorized Ag ' M�
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
D-..:--A All"

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
Shoreline
Stabilization)
Average Fbw
Existing Project
t . ,
NINE
MIMMIN
MEMO
NONE
soon
OEC 0 7 2000
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be exca(vateti from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards' �b
b. Type of material to be excavated 6011
Fiv My'at-
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _Yes o
d. Highground excavation in cubic yaz s b1'k5}
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area N)A
b. Dimensions of disposal area NIA
c. Do you claim title to disposal area? N/A
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? —Yes —No 01 A,
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes C No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes _) No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X Rpprap
b. Length L490 r
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
'ZK_/
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
LK--/ -
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of infornsation)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material **" _
Qip eAr rgft. %egACLUANTIL tMAXX*JQ%
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Rpprap L420
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material Ct-"Z = Ellt t'04E'
i. Source of fill material talA
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes is No
DEC 0 7 2000
If yes,
(1) Amount of at
water - h
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
�eSiC�^I Cytt�-Ai FwptiNtz�ti
bx y wrr, etisonC PM L4ehlil 11vC
U.W1raV;3VLp S
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
c. Will wetlands be cr5ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? —Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
y�-a�otwt�.
'Y• !,-- t I, l �It 11. I)• �ri ln+dzQ
Signature
///9/Z0"
Date
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) - ON
(1)
_ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2)
Number
(3)
Length
(4)
Width
(5)
Finger Piers —Yes _ No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6)
Platform(s) Yes —No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7)
Number of slips proposed
(8)
Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines
(9)
Width of water body
(10)
Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse
(including covered lifts) — t4/4
(1)
Commercial Private
(2)
Length
(3)
Width
c. Groin
(e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) — NIA
(1)
Number
(2)
Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length 490'
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands 3S
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands 'ts'
e. Mooring buoys — NIP
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4)
(5)
Width of water body -
Distance buoy(s) to
shoreline
be placed beyond
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number N /A
(3) Length /
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
Z akas-wM
Applicant or Project Name
signature
11 /9 /2ano
Date
ae.t%ed 03/9s

� o
J
i i
F;GOASTAL
C Oil 2000
r.J \ 30 =3 \a�,`�•7J'J 'Pt
A EADMOA HEAD _-
2,
as ��-
1
n•
it
Saj �I141 J ti
u (p�f �
It:• l • , r �� • \ I Isla
4k
�..
II
la �L •� Swar,a / k�
I -. ti.\ :Swansboro
M I
/it -Lights Daybeacan 6j
r; a
Do(SA 7J .
O• � � � � - er , hT . it
9y r
U \ Oq
Pa e J�
�� � vcYY�L'rP'`�S �'l -� `OTq l •i
�� • _ - � ( light
�L _ -
} *`
c+
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: Y=2000'
p¢o5bm * NwtNt sse- aob
CEbPp (biw}T A FA►1MMf•&@000 pget.. bNi!Lr 1�Q,du�N(71
Mtr� 6� S'11ri4 1 OP S

ISIONS
I
1pw)zcT zxoS wr-,\
vur", T
SrtgkT JL of
LIMITS OF
GRADING roll,
CITY OF SWANSBORO
ANNEL AND DITCH CENTERLINE
P.nnRDINATES
EASTING
STATION
1.227.93
2,565,354.33
10+0u
1.210.75
' 1 0 . 7 5
2,565,439.93
10+5 f. 31
#RTHING
P.219.78
2,565,464.46
11+14.83
&0+89.
r.247.39
2,565,486.26
11+52.00
:5
7,177.43
2,565,482.42
1 0�u
7.18 .86
2,565.48 .33
10+08.10
?.263.01
2.565.5606.23
1 46
OR
PR%�JNTE 11
A
DOE OF
EXISTING
MARSH
EIP
94
1A
Zl
EXIST. MARSH
NC GRID
NAD 83
N/Fti
HAROLD E. &
Co
��Ra
JOAN E.PROFQLE
H
................
.. . ...........
4
... .. ........
... . .......
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOI
A�
HEAVY MACHINERY IN I
Elp
... ...
INCLUDING MINOR GRAI
'6
DEBRIS, SHALL BE PEF
0.,
CONTRACTOR SHALL AV(
TO EXISTING WETLAND!
COORDINATE CONNECTII
ENGII
e6
AS DIRECTED BY
%
EL- 6.26'
N/F
ANTHONY JOSEPH
z KOWALSKI
DI
0.
CD
4=

WRota
00
See rode tmr
W
coorUlnoba oil
;--...
O..........................
N
:7
N.iNE�'i OYK. a
ERIstAq '
N'
r
ZQ
lepproRlmatsl
..I..i.)
cmM
¢
p�'`n
a..avxz5
BacktlN
i
Ebv.. 2A'
w
�
\I
Q
O
6bv. • 0.]5'— `.
-
• Ida
N e
V
Elev. _ -1. 15'
Ratcn
vets
Cba6 l Rlp
FRter FO 11.
a
Breakwater Structure
(Typical)
Not l o Scale
TT" nb
-ems� A? -CT r( 2 -a�oyye wr cc__
CEN>di. 1"O+NT �M Al�QNi O`
1`�ou£�]nL3E� mom
SrM3 0�
z
z
Q
1
�It
Centerline of
Structure
WHI TE OA.K
R I t/ER
EBB
FE- LOOp.-�
GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20'

J�v
- Str uPe
)icaU o
o
I
CeSttrucluref
y1
WHI TE
RI VER
EBB -
FL L pp0+
Pm�LGT � T�' No. E-�.ToSWM
GRAPHIC SCALE 1'-20'
CFAAQ, QO�Ni m%liGkwoN 20 — z0 a0 60
'�QM;-r 't)QAI.NNC�
J,joj EAA.%X2. Z-Am
Fsrm r 4 4x- "�-
w•a`4
r
0
Ce terlir of
Structure
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OPERATE ANY
HEAVY MACHINERY IN THIS AREA. ALL WORK,
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND REMOVAL OF
DEBRIS. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HAND.
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE
TO EXISTING WETLANDS VEGETATION IN THIS AREA.
COORDINATE CONNECTION TO EXISTING CONTOUR,
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
Coordinates for Center Line of Breakwater Structure
Point N E
Ti 344699.0700 2567563.1170
T2 344750.7350 25675OB269D
T3 344787.67DO 2567616.9100
T4 344811.2740 2567632.5990
T5 344834.8770 25616482870
T6 344899.6690 2567692.4510
T7 344964.4610 25677 16.G 150
18 345092.7720 2567782.0420
19 345125.3000 2567801.8600

I
Q
r�
D
Z
I
EL,I
DEC 0 1 2000
F/q

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
2 September 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: William D. Gilmore, NCDOT, P.E. Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C.Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
1�r
A �.
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCES
DEC 0 7 2000
FROM: P.A. Wojciechowsk A -
SUBJECT: MITIGATION PLANNING DOCUMENT FOR THE SWANSBORO AND CEDAR POINT
MITIGATION SITES, TIP NO. R-2105 WM
Attached is the Division's reply for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please
don't hesitate to contact me.
PAW/bc
p ik�dminlsbwverty
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Fniml rinnnrTnnih, A-.;-.• C....J....... cn.,---..-i-1, ., nni ---I ____-

DEC 0 7 2000
TO: //J,ll�- IX 2-5 A4 DATE: 9
FROM: Z/" �!
SUBJECT:
All/Le, ,
ROwpGlVabeWnuWq �.
ylilgq

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE
FINAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
T.I.P. No. R-2105 WM
DEC 0 6 2000
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Issued: November 2000

1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a low
marsh compensatory mitigation site at Cedar Point, North Carolina. This site will be used
as compensatory mitigation for future impacts to marsh communities and essential fish
habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
The Cedar Point Low Marsh Mitigation Site is located on the northeast side of NC 24, at
the south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River (Figure 1). The site totals 14.34
acres which includes an upland peninsula, 1.07 acres of upland adjacent to NC 24, and
12.92 acres of an existing tidal marsh community.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low marsh.
Therefore, this project has been designed to include the following components; 1)
excavating uplands to appropriate elevations for the establishment of low tidal marsh, 2)
constructing a breakwater structure and 3) creating a channel to provide tidal —�••
throughout the mitigation area and insure long-term success. N
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH I I DEC 0 6 2000
The Cedar Point mitigation site has been designed to maximize restoration credit pf W
marsh. Site design for the Cedar Point mitigation site considers the constraints im`p—os-eU
by adjacent properties and the existing marsh. A channel has been designed to originate
from an open -water location along the western site boundary, continue throughout the
interior of the site and exit at an open -water location along the eastern property line.
Existing on -site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the
vertical positioning of planting zones, while species selection for each zone is consistent
with the flora found on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Plan and cross sectional
views of the Cedar Point site are included as Figures 2, 3, and 4.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing 14.34 acre site consists of two community types; an upland area that is
adjacent to NC 24 and includes the peninsula area, and approximately 12.92 acres of an
existing tidal marsh with low and high marsh components.
The existing upland portion of the site is dominated by early succession grasses and
shrubs. The area adjacent to NC 24 appears to be irregularly maintained.
Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alternii fora) dominates the existing marsh component of the
site. Other plants that are part of this community include grasses and shrubs such as wax
myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page I of 4

Existing site elevations range from 0.07 feet along the lower limits of the existing salt
marsh to 7.00 feet +/- at the NC 24 right of way that occurs along the southern boundary
of the site. The average existing site elevation is approximately 5.00 feet.
Salinity data provided by NCDOT for the Cedar Point area indicates values which range
from a low of 7 ppt to a high of 30 ppt. This broad range is most reflective of the local
hurricane activity that occurred during the two months for which data was collected
(August to September 1998).
4.0 BREAKWATER STRUCTURE
The existing peninsula protects the existing marsh community from winds blowing
across White Oak River. The peninsula will be replaced with a backwater structure.
The structure will consist of Class I Rip Rap underlain with filer fabric. The location
and a cross section of this structure can be found on Figure 3.
5.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION COMMUNITIES
Two transects were used to established biological benchmarks. These transects extended
from lowest to highest elevations within the existing marsh. Sample points were selected
along each transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the low and high marsh.
Plant species were inventoried, and the elevation of each sample point was obtained by
survey. The plant species and elevations selected for the marsh restoration effort resytgp
from the use of the biological benchmarks. I�
5.1 Low Marsh DEC 0 6 2000
COASTAL MANAGEME
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the construction of a channel through the s MOREHW
The channel has been designed to originate from an open -water location along the western
site boundary, continue throughout the interior of the site and exit at an open -water
location along the eastern property line (Figure 2). The bottom of the channel has been
set at an elevation of -0.65.
Construction of this channel necessitates extending the channel through a small portion of
the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. As a consequence, 0.038 acre of low marsh will be converted to open water, and
0.072 acre will be impacted by hand clearing. The area converted to open water will be
mitigated for on -site.
The low marsh component of the site, consisting of smooth cordgrass (Spartina
alternii fora), will be planted within the elevation range of 0.35 to 1.20 feet. This planting
will occur on both the seaward and landward sides of the channel (Figure 2), as well as to
the northeast of the proposed breakwater (Figure 3). The low marsh restoration
component totals 0.38 acre.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 2 of 4

5.2 High Emergent Marsh
A high marsh area has been proposed above the low marsh areas. The proposed high
marsh area extends on the landward side of the channel as a transition between the low
marsh and upland.
The proposed elevation of the high marsh component lies between an elevation 1.20 to
2.00 feet. Species planted within this community type include saltmeadow (Spartina
patens). The high marsh restoration area totals 0.42 acre.
5.3 Upland Transition
An upland transition area will be planted above the 2.0 elevation of the high emergent
marsh. This zone will be located along NC 24 and the eastern property line. Two shrub
species, marsh elder (Iva frutescens) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), will be
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) will be planted along NC 24. F �
6.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES DEC 0 6 2000
Emergent marsh vegetation will be monitored at randomly located sample plot4miing a
software. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using realtime
GPS. A minimum of ten 1.0 mz sample plots will be located in the planted areas.
Vegetation at the site will be monitored for five years, or longer as necessary, following
the completion of planting.
Hydrologic monitoring protocols will involve the use of a surface water monitoring gauge
located within the larger restored area of the site and a second gauge located in open water
seaward of the existing marsh along the east side of the peninsula. Hydrologic data will
be collected for three years after construction or until success criteria are met.
7.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the marsh creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f--n./n,, where f-- frequency, n,= number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and n,= total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=E�n, where c= average percent cover, E,= the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots. If Phragmites
appears in any monitoring period, in more than two sampling plots, then NCDOT will
consult with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop potential control measures.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 3 of 4

The site will be considered hydrologically successful when the hydrology of the site is
flooded twice daily with elevations and durations consistent with those outside the
mitigation area. Success will be determined from data taken from surface water
monitoring gauges located in the site. It is expected that the surface water (flooding)
regime will be the same as that measured for the biological benchmarks for Spartina
alternii fora, since the plant community's zonation reflects long term tidal fluctuations.
8.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
Effective fish habitat (EFH) is defined in the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSFCMA) as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for
spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity." Marsh habitat provides areas for
fish spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity.
The NCDOT believes that the Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide
mitigation for future impacts to EFH.
9.0 CONCLUSIONS DEC 0 6 2000
The Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide "up front" mitigation credit for fu Tu MANAG E
impacts to marsh communities resulting from road projects. The NCDOT ul Aefstan WRgt! �D
that risks are involved in constructing the site without identifying a mitigation "need" at
this time.
As mentioned earlier, impacts to the existing marsh community area necessary to connect
the project hydrologically to the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by
limiting grade work to hand removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.038 acre from
conversion to open water, and 0.072 acre will be disturbed by hand clearing. The
NCDOT will mitigate for conversion to open water on -site, and does not intend to
mitigate for areas impacted by hand clearing.
Table 1 summarizes marsh mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing Cedar
Point Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Cedar Point Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alterniflora
0.34 acre*
0.17 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.76 acre*
0.38 acre*
"*"indicates that 0.038 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been subtracted from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 4 of 4

FIGURE 1
n
�. a1,
• .o t 7
a
C Robinson 1
Pt
o o
" CC DEC U 200O �
COA&TAL MANACie�Mtti. v
- 3" MOREH 6
n
', o Jorti
lo� lslar
OLIy„5
W � O
g,
•.Swansboro,
i
^ .
4 i . Fa,!
DoIsA
p y , �1�!/`X light
P4,��
f , ° L•ahtA
SOURCE, USGS SWAINSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1"=2000'
W>fp, Poiar ►IniTi a A-T'w -TiP kn . E- ZWS-wm
Vill

cecp&p+ �"`T rAh1i 4ullald
TP wo. E-aLQswrvl
h'� e-
M1'ri 1�0'rjgJ
Lowki
¢shsto2cssionl 0.81t ACK o �'
N�ppfcN f Cp 1.co
N
JOHN. R R. &
LOIS B. JONES
JK EDGE OF EXISTING
44; MARSH
i1 I t Z_
EXISTING R/W
I. SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR EXCAVATION AND
GRADING REOUIREMENTS.
2. BENCH MARK: -L- STA. 67+04 43' RT
R.R. SPIKE IN PP
ELEV.= 5.68' NAVO 29
4 CONTRACTOR
EXISTING SHALLPROVIDE
GRADES SMOOTH
REMAINAND
PROPOSED MARSH GRADES TO BE CREATED.
--------------------------------------------
EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
- --- W HWY 24
1
1
4:Q
CEDAR POINT
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OPERATE
ANY MACHINERY IN THIS AREA. ALL WORK.
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND REMOVAL OF
DEBRIS. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HAND.
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE
TO EXISTING WETLANDS VEGETATION IN THIS
CONTOUR, ADINOIRECTEDTE NBYTION TO THE ENGINEERING
DEC 0 6 2000
OF �yYN WIyJ
un ;
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING R/W
GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20
2p 20 40 60

REVISIONS
cet> - -pc�•J T MillCxplio,J Str,
TIP *4 • 2_---1o4T Wnn
NojeN"Z,Ez zxuo
hyQe4, LIr .
8'
I 0.35
-0.65
4
SECTION D-D
N.T.S.
VfV nlTrl-I PRnFII F
SHEET
Langley and McDonald.
CEDAR POINT
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
DEC 0 6
�����
i�iOW1iY��YtiI�W�Yir���/L'a�r'"=��■i������
�
��
���
,IUV
�F+nn
57+00
58+00
��itEi0116tit7i1�■ri4JdW�Ltii���—�
�
[������
�—.—.
. 1uu ,. ..,,.
STA.55+50 56+50 GRAPHIC SCALES:
RORIZ. SCALE: I•=2O' — 20 40 60
20
VERT. SCALE: 1'=4' I2
57+50
JAM PRO✓ • /960024-20/.00 L&M OrvC • J0.546-F

� � .. � a_ _ � � •
' - _ \
. �- .
.., s �
. � � �'
/� �
—_
-- _c���S - �cA�.

!__
�
r i -.
�
. � .J.'.. Imo/
.\
� 11.
,,
� ,
�
_ i
i Jib
,. r�
f ��
s �
_ .�
, :,,
_
�
—�
,,
a
�
�
_
�
,.
-
_ __
-
✓._._
__ _ 7.N
i
�
f
�
` _ ,
_,
- . ---
-� r- - � -
._ _
-it�

(0

-------------------
_
Ao
,
01
4

JAMES B. HuNT JR.
GOVERNOR
0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
November 9, 2000
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II, 151 B, Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Attention: Ms. Tere Barrett
DAvtD MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Onslow and Carteret Counties, Construction of Swansboro and Cedar
Point Mitigation Sites, TIP No. R-2105WM.
Dear Ms. Barrett:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct the Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation Sites in Onslow and Carteret
Counties. These two sites are located adjacent to NC 24. The NCDOT seeks
authorization under a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development
Permit to construct these two mitigation sites. The NCDOT believes that all questions
related to the project have been resolved and desires to commence project construction as
soon as possible.
Project Purpose
The NCDOT plans to construct these two marsh sites as "up front" compensatory
mitigation for future transportation related projects to marsh and essential fish habitat in
White Oak River Basin. Currently, there is no designated road project requiring
compensatory mitigation generated by these projects. The NCDOT understands that
there are "risks" involved in constructing these two mitigation sites since there are not
any designated mitigation "needs" at this time.
Project Description: Cedar Point Mitigation Site
The Cedar Point Mitigation Site is located on the northeast side of NC 24, at the
south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River (Figure 1). The site totals 14.34
acres which includes an upland peninsula, 1.07 acres of upland adjacent to NC 24, and
12.92 acres of an existing tidal marsh community.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH VNLMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOTSTATE.NC.US RALEIGH, NC

The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low
marsh. The project design includes 1) excavating uplands to appropriate elevations for the
establishment of low tidal marsh, 2) constructing a breakwater structure and 3) creating a
channel to provide tidal exchange throughout the mitigation area and insure long-term
success.
Impacts to existing marsh have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.038 acre from conversion to open water,
and 0.072 acre will be disturbed by hand clearing. The NCDOT will mitigate for
conversion to open water on -site (1:1 ratio), and does not intend to mitigate for areas
impacted by hand clearing. The potential mitigation credit for future NCDOT projects
totals 0.76 acre, or 0.38 acre of credit based on a 2:1 mitigation ratio.
A final mitigation planning document has been attached to this letter and is dated
November 2000. This document replaces the previously provided document dated July
2000. Figures 2, 3 and 4 of the final document are design plans for the mitigation site.
Project Description: Swansboro Mitigation Site
The Swansboro Mitigation Site is located on the White Oak River, just north of
the intersection of Elm Street and NC 24. The site totals 0.63 acre that includes 0.16 acre
of existing marsh fringing the high ground.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low
marsh. The proposed design plan involves lowering the grade at the site to restore low
and high marsh, constructing a channel through the site, and constructing a plunge pool at
a stormwater outfall discharging from NC 24. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.012
acre from the conversion of marsh to open water, and 0.028 acre impacted will be
disturbed by hand clearing. This impact associated with conversion to open water will be
"deducted" from mitigation credit generated by site construction; therefore, potential
mitigation credit for future NCDOT projects totals 0.32 acre, or 0.16 acre of credit based
on a 2:1 mitigation ratio.
A final mitigation planning document has been attached to this letter and is dated
November 2000. This document replaces the previously provided document dated July
2000. Figures 2 and 3 of the final document are design plans for the mitigation site.
History of Mitigation Projects and Changes in Planning Reports
In August 1999, the NCDOT provided conceptual mitigation planning reports
dated July 1999 for comments to the following resources agencies: North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM), U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (UWFWS) and North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF).
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 2 of 5

In a letter dated September 2, 1999, NCDMF provided written response to the
conceptual mitigation planning reports dated July 1999. The NCDMF visited the site and
had no objection to the project. A copy of the letter is attached with this permit
application letter.
In separate letters dated September 7, 1999, NCDCM provided two comments on
the. Cedar Point Marsh Mitigation Site and Swansboro Mitigation Site, Concept Reports
dated July 1999. These letters contained the same comments and are addressed together.
The first comment involved the use of the term "creation" in the report and
mitigation ratios. The term "creation" in the July 1999 was not used with respect to
mitigation credits but referred to construction of the site. It is NCDOT" opinion that each
site has been previously filled and considers each site to generate "restoration" credits.
The terminology has been "correctly" applied in both final reports dated November 2000.
The second comment dealt with monitoring hydrology. The report dated July
1999 stated that monitoring of hydrology would occur for one year. The NCDCM stated
that this is not acceptable and recommended a minimum of three years. This comment
has been incorporated into the final mitigation documents for both sites. dated November
2000.
Agency representatives from NCDOT, NCDCM, USACE, NCDWQ, NCWRC,
USFWS and NMFS met at mitigation site on October 27, 1999. The mitigation concepts
presented in the reports dated July 1999 were discussed.
At Swansboro Mitigation Site, three changes have been made based on the site
review. First, the forebay has been replaced with a plunge pool. This change has been
noted in the final report for the site dated November 2000.
The second change involves the open channel. The open channel in the July 1999
report proposed connecting the proposed forebay and White Oak River. In the final
report dated November 2000, the open channel now extends through the mitigation site
from White Oak River. Figure 2 of the report depicts the channel's location.
The third change deals with the depth of the proposed open channel. Originally,
the channel was to be 2 feet deep. The proposed channel is now 1 foot deep as depicted
on Figure 2 of the November 2000 report.
At Cedar Point Mitigation Site, two changes have been made. First, the proposed
open channel is now 1 foot deep as opposed to 2 feet in the July 199i document. This is
depicted in Figure 2 of the November 2000 report.
The second change involves the proposed construction of a breakwater. This
breakwater would replace the existing peninsula that is currently being eroded and
protects the existing marsh community to the east. Mr. Ron Sechler ofNMFS provided
this suggestion at the October 1999 meeting. Literature from the Coastal Federation was
obtained to design the breakwater. The NCDOT plans to construct the proposed
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 3 of 5

breakwater between the existing peninsula and White Oak River, to remove the existing
peninsula and to plant low marsh after the peninsula is removed. The proposed
construction of the breakwater has been included in the final report dated November 2000
as text and depiction (Figure 3).
Mitigation Credits
These two mitigation sites together will generate 0.31 acre of low marsh
restoration credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio) and 0.23 acre of high marsh restoration
credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio). These totals include the amount deducted for
conversion of open water from existing marsh during project construction. These credits
will be applied to future impacts to marsh and EFH.
Table 1 summarizes mitigation credits per mitigation community type at Cedar
Point Mitigation Site.
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Cedar Point Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type;
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alternii fora
0.34 acre*
0.17 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.76 acre*
0.38 acre*
"*"indicates that 0.038 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been subtracted from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Table 2 summarizes mitigation credits per mitigation community type at
Swansboro Mitigation Site.
Table 2. Summary of Mitigation at Swansboro Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alterniora
0.28 acre*
0.14 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.04 acre
0.02 acre
Totals
0.32 acre*
0.16 acre*
"*" indicates that 0.012`acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been debited from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Summary of Permit Application
The NCDOT proposes to construct these two mitigation sites under a single
CAMA Major Development Permit. The pertinent CAMA applications forms (MP-1,
MP-2 and MP-6) and permit drawings for both proposed marsh mitigation sites are
attached to this cover letter as well as the fee for processing the permit application. The
NCDOT will forward certification forms that it has contacted adjacent property owners of
this project's actions. Application is also made for 401 Water Quality Certification from
NCDWQ.
The NCDOT believes that a Section 404 General Permit 291 is applicable for
constructing these mitigation sites. Application is therefore made this permit too.
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 4 of 5

Final mitigation planning documents for Cedar Point Mitigation Site and
Swansboro Mitigation Site (dated November 2000) are attached to this CAMA Major
Development permit application. Design plans for the sites have been included; Figures
2, 3 and 4 for Cedar Point and Figures 2 and 3 for Swansboro. These documents replace
the reports dated July 1999 and include comments from resource agencies as described in
this cover letter.
These two mitigation sites together will generate 0.31 acre of low marsh
restoration credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio) and 0.23 acre of high marsh restoration
credit (2:1 restoration credit ratio). These totals include the amount deducted for
conversion of open water from existing marsh during project construction. These credits
will be applied to future impacts to marsh and EFH.
Thank you for your assistance in processing this permit application. We believe
that all issues have been resolved and hope to begin construction of this project soon. If
you have questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Phillip Todd at
[phone], Extension 314.
Sincerely,
0 W. D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
O Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Kelly Williams, NCDCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Morehead City
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF, Morehead City
CAMA Major Development Permit November 9, 2000
Swansboro/ Cedar Point Mitigation Sites Page 5 of 5

Form DCM-MP-I
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
Bea
1. APPLICANT
c. Street address or secondary road number
tx, Z*
a. Landowner:
Name 1`I• C• �Y �� +i 1e.,CPct sri-Qd• Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Y Yes No
Address M tS Mt►L S NiCAL C£NrM-
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
City V'NLti' C-F State NC r creek, sound, bay) W4tit a. OAC. ENT-R-
Zipa-+46`M' IrwBDay Phone C111) :+33 -31*1
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
c. Project name (f any) �'�t4SUJM
NOTE. Pnndt wiA be issued in M of landownrr(s), and/or
projecf name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County
Revised U0/95
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
GCV,32MU(r Mi7iCngTioW S+MS
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? NeW WOZ-lc-
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? VQ%%iG
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
coismCr M1-rt 4ay 101� Sift S �oQ
%&T- 44 ;vtvtx.

Form DCM-MP-I
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
9W Scxo
a. Size of entire tract Gto►t. Pt�%r3r
b. Size of individual lot(s) M/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sc*^ , to AXT %
e. Vegetation on tract scw% c s&".1 &LAWS
f. Man-made features now on tract txnfl
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consalr the loatr rand are plan.)
Conservation
X Developed
Rural
C Transitional
Community
Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
QYStOE�TitAV � CANtMR.It-GAS.
Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes X No
(Anach zoning compliance cetrijicate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? % Yes No
If yes, by whom? pP&r t tFA& Fat.
TtQ $ Q-swS 16`1 WCMIT 0,00 >c=W is;T
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
I. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? _ X
(Anaci docvrnenration, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
n.. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
& AN"% A- %Aitq..
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name ec86t r Q• NVWZCWS
Address Qto Q2.+eN61i t3c>rr
Phone SEAt.UESCIi NC, ZS5110
Name Cn%+ d Tcuzw OALL
Address 1i O• ts..OK. 3tc8
Phone SWAI rSSoto , V- , Q65EVk
C'At,_ r
Address T0 Lam.
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Ad (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PER USSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of
Print Name, \)J. W WvA 1] .
Y •
Signature '�
14rdo r or Authorized AgA 11lp9
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
o-..:_-. 41/�

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLw) or (NwL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other t�
(Excluding ,l�
shortunc
subiliWion)
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards —4-+cto4-
b. Type of material to be excavated,
Fitz. MArF21At-
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? _ Yes YL No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards a454-
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area 141A
b. Dimensions of disposal area NIA
c. Do you claim title to disposal area? NJA
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No 01 A
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes )CC _ No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the wateO
Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X_ Riprap
b. Length
490'
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
�/
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
44T-1
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material C$-*" _'
V t P ZAr Fdt, gCEACaAW Q- %1"C %A L
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap Liao
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material CLAU- Z VP W
i. Source of fill material of
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
iU¢ti�` . 1 C-QtT-41ha (FWp\1Nh) V
DtS16N S°t7aNr�aR.r2f FO2 i'iNi�vt;
WA�F¢.Si1rE.t> S
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
41:i .u�rt4tr„rr-lo�l F�nPIME�Ji"
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _ Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
e.-a�oswt�.
App Ikant or. "J Name
9'• c- . S M.m
signature
///q,Iz 0no
Vate
Revised 03195

Form DCM-NIP 4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) — 0/1-16
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width
(5) Finger Piers _ Yes _ No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(6) Platform(s) _ Yes _ No
(i) Number
(d) Length
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines
(9) Width of water body
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) — 0/4
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) — MIA
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
(1) Length 490�
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands aS'
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands `IS''
e. Mooring buoys — NIA
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4)
(5)
Width of water body -
Distance buoy(s) to
shoreline
be placed beyond
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number /
(3) Length iJ iJ
(4) Width
g. Other (Give complete description)
e BtoSWrv)
Applicant or Project Name
Z. c -14") G. lMac
Signature
11 /q /2.jno
Date
D--'-.a none

Ll
Robinson
o r .
0 ((
/i
- Jan
v Isla
� 1
� r
o �� /t� _ , = Swats � ,.•. / �
-Swansboro
1 777111 oLights Dayb acon
cc
4,9
LighIn
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1'=2000'
F>a1lac�v *- -TiP # E-zwE -WM Nmp-oArsre- mom
mbw- Wiw1T d &.uAK4%0eo p4Qr FxRLr pQCW,N(�
tht,; romiav s�S \ of S

';10N5
jir-a zouz)--T WN-\
OL of
LIMITS OF
GRADING
.�l,qll
4z
C I TY OF SWANSBOR�X�
.50
PROEMJNJE OF
AV
INEL AND DITCH CENTERLINE
COORDINATES
HING
EASTING
STATION
7277-93
--T.-5-9-5,354.33
10+00
'10.75
2.56 6. 4 T9-.-93-
10+87.31
FI 9. 7-8
2,565,464.40
11+14.03
!47.39
2.565.486.26
11+52.00
77.43
2.565.482.42
10+00
183.86
2.565.487.33
0+08.10
?63.01
2,565,506.23
10+89.46
Elp
.,a,.
"x
EXIST. MARSH
N/F
HAROLD E. &
JOAN E. KERRI
"ch
EL- 6.26'
�Dl
POP*
DOE OF EXISTING
MARSH
NC GAR
ti NAD 83
...... ...... .
CONTRACTOR N(
HEAVY MACHINERY IN
Elp INCLUDING MINOR GRO
Ar DEBRIS. SHALL BE PI
CONTRACTOR SHALL Al
TO EXISTING WETLANI
COORDINATE CONNECT.
AS DIRECTED BY ENG
�A
W ITNkC ;�W PR
�0� N E�VL �2O
1.gj �p
OM
N/F
,j-A"THONY JOSEPH
KOWALSKI

Nofe,
Sae fable far
cooralnafea os a
' FNY�IV� BCCFfIN
flay.= LS'
Elev.= 0.35'-
comae IRlorao I rllrer
Eeleflnq Erossectlon
I<persalmotel
Elay.= 2.0'
Erg--� slew �
.eunno elevat[o
icn en
avann
Breakwater Structure
(Typical)
Not to Scale sea6cu i-�
-M-04EeT f7� 2 wr-)
-aaoe
CLAM P.ZM NT MrvL�11 AV064 c
Nt -r -t>m�
i�E)Vk 3e p- mom
F5Yt4�-T 3 0� S
i
Centerline of
S
z
Strucructuure
Q
L
z/ WHI TF OA.K
R I v E R
EBBS
FL / 000y
Centerline of
Structure
GRAPHIC SCALE ?•=pp'

,Ma,t� >.IeflnO
erima rsvonon
Structure
!cal)
2
z
Cer�tfr lcl rof
r
--Fir
Opp
R
11/ER
�EBB�
F�— [
No. E-.a4ovwr^
GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20'
CEnAz Poi4Jr PAT1Tc�,(3r�on7 zo - 20 40 - G0
islrS.
'�>'—Yr;T "t>QAINNC-j
srtssry 4x ,,;
s�
Ce terline of
Structure
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OPERATE ANY
HEAVY MACHINERY IN THIS AREA. ALL WORK,
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND REMOVAL OF
DEBRIS. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HAND.
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE
TO EXISTING WETLANDS VEGETATION IN THIS AREA.
COORDINATE CONNECTION TO EXISTING CONTOUR.
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
Coordinates for Center Line of Breohroter Structure
Point B E
TI 344699.0700 2567563.1170
T2 344750,7350 2567588.2690
T3 344787.6700 2567616.9100
T4 3448112740 2567632.5990
T5 344834.8170 2567648.2870
16 344899.6690 2561682.4510
17 344964.4610 2567716.6150
T8 345092.7720 2567782.0420
19 345125.3000 2567801.8600

R1w
N/F
JOHN. R.
LO(S B. JONES
EDGE OF EXISTING
MARSH
lks
I
oq
�L
-LREV
41
-----------------
-------------------

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
2 September 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: William D. Gilmore, NCDOT, P.E. Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C.Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
1�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FROM: P.A. Wojciechowski A -
SUBJECT: MITIGATION PLANNING "DOCUMENT FOR THE SWANSBORO AND CEDAR POINT
MITIGATION SITES, TIP NO. R-2105 WM
Attached is the Division's reply for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please
don't hesitate to contact me.
PAW/bc
Perftl dm..Isb ow&
P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-0769 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A_r_._1 �__ .. -- .. .

TO: - &Alc /M%� DATE: i 9
FROM: /�o,46:66n
SUBJECT:
RESPOND BY:
For Your Informatio_ n
4.. ,
_
} ForAcUon
r
_
Comments" Required
Al,lLel ,

CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE
FINAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
T.I.P. No. R-2105 WM
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Issued: November 2000

1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a low
marsh compensatory mitigation site at Cedar Point, North Carolina. This site will be used
as compensatory mitigation for future impacts to marsh communities and essential fish
habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
The Cedar Point Low Marsh Mitigation Site is located on the northeast side of NC 24, at
the south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River (Figure 1). The site totals 14.34
acres which includes an upland peninsula, 1.07 acres of upland adjacent to NC 24, and
12.92 acres of an existing tidal marsh community.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low marsh.
Therefore, this project has been designed to include the following components; 1)
excavating uplands to appropriate elevations for the establishment of low tidal marsh, 2)
constructing a breakwater structure and 3) creating a channel to provide tidal exchange
throughout the mitigation area and insure long-term success.
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH
The Cedar Point mitigation site has been designed to maximize restoration credit of low
marsh. Site design for the Cedar Point mitigation site considers the constraints imposed
by adjacent properties and the existing marsh. A channel has been designed to originate
from an open -water location along the western site boundary, continue throughout the
interior of the site and exit at an open -water location along the eastern property line.
Existing on -site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the
vertical positioning of planting zones, while species selection for each zone is consistent
with the flora found on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Plan and cross sectional
views of the Cedar Point site are included as Figures 2, 3, and 4.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing 14.34 acre site consists of two community types; an upland area that is
adjacent to NC 24 and includes the peninsula area, and approximately 12.92 acres of an
existing tidal marsh with low and high marsh components.
The existing upland portion of the site is dominated by early succession grasses and
shrubs. The area adjacent to NC 24 appears to be irregularly maintained.
Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) dominates the existing marsh component of the
site. Other plants that are part of this community include grasses and shrubs such as wax
myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 1 of 4

Existing site elevations range from 0.07 feet along the lower limits of the existing salt
marsh to 7.00 feet +A at the NC 24 right of way that occurs along the southern boundary
of the site. The average existing site elevation is approximately 5.00 feet.
Salinity data provided by NCDOT for the Cedar Point area indicates values which range
from a low of 7 ppt to a high of 30 ppt. This broad range is most reflective of the local
hurricane activity that occurred during the two months for which data was collected
(August to September 1998).
4.0 BREAKWATER STRUCTURE
The existing peninsula protects the existing marsh community from winds blowing
across White Oak River. The peninsula will be replaced with a backwater structure.
The structure will consist of Class I Rip Rap underlain with filer fabric. The location
and a cross section of this structure can be found on Figure 3.
5.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION COMMUNITIES
Two transects were used to established biological benchmarks. These transects extended
from lowest to highest elevations within the existing marsh. Sample points were selected
along each transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the low and high marsh.
Plant species were inventoried, and the elevation of each sample point was obtained by
survey. The plant species and elevations selected for the marsh restoration effort resulted
from the use of the biological benchmarks.
5.1 Low Marsh
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the construction of a channel through the site.
The channel has been designed to originate from an open -water location along the western
site boundary, continue throughout the interior of the site and exit at an open -water
location along the eastern property line (Figure 2). The bottom of the channel has been
set at an elevation of -0.65.
Construction of this channel necessitates extending the channel through a small portion of
the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. As a consequence, 0.038 acre of low marsh will be converted to open water, and
0.072 acre will be impacted by hand clearing. The area converted to open water will be
mitigated for on -site.
The low marsh component of the site, consisting of smooth cordgrass (Spartina
alternii lora), will be planted within the elevation range of 0.35 to 1.20 feet. This planting
will occur on both the seaward and landward sides of the channel (Figure 2), as well as to
the northeast of the proposed breakwater (Figure 3). The low marsh restoration
component totals 0.38 acre.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 2 of �f

5.2 High Emergent Marsh
A high marsh area has been proposed above the low marsh areas. The proposed high
marsh area extends on the landward side of the channel as a transition between the low
marsh and upland.
The proposed elevation of the high marsh component lies between an elevation 1.20 to
2.00 feet. Species planted within this community type include saltmeadow (Spartina
patens). The high marsh restoration area totals 0.42 acre.
5.3 Upland Transition
An upland transition area will be planted above the 2.0 elevation of the high emergent
marsh. This zone will be located along NC 24 and the eastern property line. Two shrub
species, marsh elder (Iva frutescens) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), will be planted.
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) will be planted along NC 24.
6.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES
Emergent marsh vegetation will be monitored at randomly located sample plots using GIS
software. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using realtime .
GPS. A minimum of ten 1.0 mZ sample plots will be located in the planted areas.
Vegetation at the site will be monitored for five years, or longer as necessary, following
the completion of planting.
Hydrologic monitoring protocols will involve the use of a surface water monitoring gauge
located within the larger restored area of the site and a second gauge located in open water
seaward of the existing marsh along the east side of the peninsula. Hydrologic data will
be collected for three years after construction or until success criteria are met.
7.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the marsh creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f=nx/ry, where f-- frequency, n = number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and n,= total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=Y-jn, where c= average percent cover, E.= the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots. If Phragmites
appears in any monitoring period, in more than two sampling plots, then NCDOT will
consult with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop potential control measures.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 1000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 3 of

The site will be considered hydrologically successful when the hydrology of the site is
flooded twice daily with elevations and durations consistent with those outside the
mitigation area. Success will be determined from data taken from surface water
monitoring gauges located in the site. It is expected that the surface water (flooding)
regime will be the same as that measured for the biological benchmarks for Spartina
alterniflora, since the plant community's zonation reflects long term tidal fluctuations.
8.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
Effective fish habitat (EFH) is defined in the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSFCMA) as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for
spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity." Marsh habitat provides areas for
fish spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity.
The NCDOT believes that the Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide compensatory
mitigation for future impacts to EFH.
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide "up front" mitigation credit for future
impacts to marsh communities resulting from road projects. The NCDOT understands
that risks are involved in constructing the site without identifying a mitigation "need" at
this time.
As mentioned earlier, impacts to the existing marsh community area necessary to connect
the project hydrologically to the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by
limiting grade work to hand removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.038 acre from
conversion to open water, and 0.072 acre will be disturbed by hand clearing. The
NCDOT will mitigate for conversion to open water on -site, and does not intend to
mitigate for areas impacted by hand clearing.
Table 1 summarizes marsh mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing Cedar
Point Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Cedar Point Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alterniflora
0.34 acre*
0.17 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.76 acre*
0.38 acre*
indicates that 0.038 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been subtracted from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 4 of

I
FIGURE 1
I
i
s
.. rfJ • I�� 1 �T'u. v n
z
�1 Robinson I
Pt
if
u ly `.N mac. 1
''�� , it �� • \` `nI �- aaap 1
u
IJ Y
({11
u
ik
11,14
sw'
a
° ; ' 3 i \ �•.Swansboro
N ...�-Llgb's Daybeaw0
1 0
\ c
�.
is
Dot
.. e f( oe44
C� \fie • ' a'���`,, � � � 1
Light
cut
Y
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROUNA 7.5 MINUR: QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1°=2000'
CSpAQ, ptitTT MITI a A -OW -lip W , Q,- Z)kgo"TwM
SA"m

xota
$ps tmM fx
�eorWwitt of t
6AYI'm `
Q:N!E2
EI.-= 2Y
S 4
Elpr.= -I.IS'
7z"pQLy'9 ,,,�p
�0L1AImv'
Not to Scale
t
SWM
Brelf�,�
MOVE OR OPERATE ANY
AREA. ALL WORK.
I REMOVAL OF
BY HAND.
IY DISTURBANCE
rATION IN THIS AREA.
XISTING CONTOUR,
R.
Centerline of �o
Structure
90
10
20
100
eo- T
Centerline of
Structure
ter Line of Breakwater Structure
E
2567563.1170
2567588.2690
2567616.9100
2567632S9B0
2567648.2870
2567682.4510
2567716.6150
2567782.0420
2567801.8600
e

- -
0.35
-0.65
D-D
COORDINATE COONECTI N TO
E ISTING AS DIRECTED BY ,
•
,
_ I
13+00 14+00
- 1
a
<
PROJECT REFERENCE NO- i SHEET NO.
SHEET N0.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
i2 I' y
A 9y�
B. IAv`�•`
�� Langley and McDonald, Inc.
CEDAR POINT
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
,
POSED
R/W
PROPOSED
R/W
�
PRO
.GRACE
ir
4
-r-
4
-
EXIT
. GRADE
0
PF
OP. GRAOEI
-
I
I
O
0
0
0
—
+I00
58+00
+0
12
PROPOSED
R/W
NC 24
E
IST. MARS
PRO
. MARSH
C 24
<
-
a
I
I
EXIST. GRADE
PROP.
GRADE
P.
P. GRADE
N
O
✓1
O
I
N
O
P
o �
o
+0 +20U
GRAPHIC SCALES.
HORIZ. SCALE: V=20'
20 20 40 60
VERT. SCALE: V=4'
6 12
+100
57+50
L8M PROJ •
+0
/960024-20400 L&fA ON'G ' 30.546-F

SWANSBORO MITIGATION SITE
FINAL NIITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
T.I.P. Number R-2105 WM
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Issued: November 2000

1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a low
marsh compensatory mitigation site at Swansboro, North Carolina. This site will be used
as compensatory mitigation for future impacts to marsh communities and essential fish
habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
The Swansboro Mitigation Site is located on the White Oak River, just north of the
intersection of Elm Street and NC 24 (Figure 1). The site totals 0.63 acre that includes
0.16 acre of existing marsh fringing the high ground. The objective of this project is to
provide for future marsh mitigation credit in the White Oak River basin.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low marsh.
Therefore, this project involves the excavation of uplands to appropriate elevations for
the establishment of emergent tidal marsh. A plunge pool will be constructed at an
existing stormwater outfall along the southern property line. The plunge pool will
provide for the attenuation of stormwater prior to entering the existing tidal marsh and the
White Oak River from the NC 24 stormwater outfall.
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH
The Swansboro site will be designed to maximize the restoration of low, emergent tidal
marsh. Therefore, site grading and planting plans attempt to maximize these objectives
while taking into account the constraints imposed by adjacent properties and the existing
marsh. Plan and cross sectional views of the Swansboro site are included as Figures 2
and 3.
Existing on -site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the
vertical positions of planting zones. The plant selection for the mitigation area is
consistent with the flora found on or in the immediate vicinity of the site.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing 0.41 acre site consists of two community types; an upland area previously
partitioned into three residential that is adjacent to NC 24 and an existing tidal marsh with
low and high marsh components.
The upland portion of the site is 0.25 acre in size. The houses existing on the property
have been demolished and removed by NCDOT. A marsh area, totaling 0.16 acre in size,
fringes the existing upland transition and is dominated by marsh species.
'Existing site elevations range from 0.58 feet along the lower limits of the existing salt
marsh to 13.87 feet at the NC 24 right of way that occurs along the western boundary of
the site. The average existing site elevation is approximately 7.00 feet.
Swansboro Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan
November2000
Page 1 of 4

Salinity data provided by NCDOT for the Swansboro area indicates values that range
from a low of 4 ppt to a high of 30 ppt. This broad range is reflective of the local
hurricane activity during the two months for which data was collected (August and
September 1998).
4.0 PROPOSED SITE DESIGN
Stormwater from NC 24 will be attenuated by constructing a 10' x 10' plunge pool at
the pipe outlet. A proposed 0.5 foot deep channel will connect the proposed plunge pool
to the White Oak River. A concrete headwall will be constructed at the end of the outfall
pipe to retain the existing slope.
Biological benchmarks were established by installing two transects which ran from
lowest to highest elevations within the existing marsh. Sample points were selected
along each transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the low and high marsh.
Plant species were inventoried, and the elevation of each sample point was obtained by
survey. The plant species and elevations selected for the wetland creation project resulted
from the use of the biological benchmarks.
Site grading will be designed to slope down from the proposed NC 24 road right-of-way
to an elevation of 1.20 feet. This elevation was determined to be the approximate upper
limit of the low emergent marsh based on the biological benchmarks collected on -site.
The site will continue sloping downward to an elevation of 0.32 feet. This elevation is
mean low water elevation and the top of bank elevation for the proposed channel.
4.1 Low Marsh
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the construction of a channel through the site.
The channel has been designed to originate from an.open-water location along the
northern site boundary and continue throughout the interior of the site toward the western
property line (Figure 2). The bottom of the channel has been set at an elevation of -0.65.
Construction of this channel necessitates extending the channel through a small portion of
the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. As a consequence, 0.012 acre of low marsh will be converted to open water, and
0.028 acre will be impacted by hand clearing. The area converted to open water will be
mitigated for on -site.
The low marsh component of the mitigation site will be planted with smooth cordgrass
(Spartina alterniflora). The elevation of the plantings range from 0.35 to 1.20 feet. The
restored low marsh totals 0.29 acre in size.
4.3 High Marsh
Swansboro Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan
November 2000
Page 2 of 4

A small area of high marsh has been proposed between the low marsh area and the upland
buffer area. The high marsh component, consisting of saltmeadow (Spartina patens), will
be planted at an elevation of 1.20 feet to 2.00 feet. The restored high marsh component
of the site totals 0.04 acre.
4.4 Upland Transition, Zone 4
Au upland transition area will exist from the high marsh community to NC 24. This zone
will be located along NC 24 and the eastern property line. Two shrub species, marsh
elder (Iva frutescens) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), will be planted. Bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted along NC 24.
5.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES
Emergent marsh vegetation will be monitored at randomly located sample plots using
GIS software. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using
realtime GPS. A minimum of ten 1.0 m2 sample plots will be located in the planted areas.
Vegetation at the site will be monitored for five years, or longer as necessary, following
the completion of planting.
Hydrologic monitoring protocols will involve the use of a surface water monitoring
gauge located within the larger, restored area of the site and a second gauge located in
open water seaward of the existing marsh. Hydrologic data will be collected for three
years after construction or until success criteria are met.
6.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the marsh creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by 1=lVny, where f= frequency, nx= number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and ny= total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=Y jn, where c= average percent cover, E, = the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots. If Phragmites
appears in any monitoring period, in more than two sampling plots, then the NCDOT will
consult with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop potential control measures.
The site will be considered hydrologically successful when the hydrology of the site is
flooded twice daily with elevations and durations consistent with those outside the
mitigation area. Success will be determined from data taken from a surface water
monitoring gauge located in the site. It is expected that the surface water (flooding)
regime will be the same as that measured for the biological benchmarks for smooth
Swansboro Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan
November 2000
Page 3 of 4

cordgrass (Spartina alterniora), since the plant community's zonation reflects long term
tidal fluctuations.
8.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
Effective fish habitat (EFH) is defined in the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSFCMA) as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for
spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity." Marsh habitat provide areas for
fish spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity.
The NCDOT believes that the Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide compensatory
mitigation for future impacts to EFH.
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Swansboro Mitigation Site will provide "up front" mitigation credit for future
impacts to marsh communities resulting from road projects. The NCDOT understands
that risks are involved in constructing the site without identifying a mitigation "need" at
this time.
As mentioned earlier, impacts to the existing marsh community area necessary to connect
the project hydrologically to the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by
limiting grade work to hand removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.012 acre from
conversion to open water, and 0.028 acre impacted will be disturbed by hand clearing.
The NCDOT will mitigate for conversion to open water on -site, and does not intend to
mitigate for areas impacted by hand clearing.
Table 1 summarizes marsh mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing
Swansboro Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Swansboro Mitigation Site `_
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area -_-
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alternii fora
0.28 acre*
0.14 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.04 acre
0.02 acre
Totals
032 acre*
0.16 acre*
indicates maz u.u12 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been debited from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Swansboro Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 4 of 4

I
•�h�s` ���1 I• _>. \ .Robinson
•' Pt
30
I\ r lc r 4^^ by i,y�.aa x -•_ .�•i;,r
IC w `•• �\y `l • i I.
dl �• @ i
Y ` l 7
pN',1 /� � /•, ���s • A � l01 Isla
II
� �`
� 4
SW��
II • �a
d. ,� °� r 1,✓ .Swansboro j
oLigh pDaybacan %
gory NI/ rk }mod •('{{i�"IS J ,
bl Dals� �aIL
f�• lz
L_
Q e }.}lNc�F<1 jTy4 LIT
C/I Light '.
Z7,
F
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1'=2000'
SwwN%?-ceo Mmcej4ra! tiP too• E-�to� Wn..

I
' �~ OGa�4rwur4ily '�iPf. /�E �Gl.'fA/0T�'Ce�i
SW41J5 o nniTita�l�y.1 43hi_ tcw MAV* 0.76 AG c.s r' -m °s
TAP No alb WM e��nr.l� ,-2.o/ EIP IA
No.�N••aee� ��'� 1ii�1 �� 0 04 �;
�• 1 [�,Apfi- 2 ' �,4'iCeA•iu0�1 -to y yy EXIST. MARSH
(� `4 HAROLD E. 6
LIMITS OF -
GRADING `; 61 •' � 0� JOAN E. KERB.
............
................_.......
C-ITY OF SWANSBORO �y5°9 t6
...
EE CHp a N .. .
EEFCHANNEL p
PROpoSFO - tie _ y may' a- p` ........ "
y''
.
� A ......
'
PAOEMENTE OF
CHANNEL AND DITCH CENTERLINE.
CnnRDINATFS
PT-m
NORTHING
EASTING
"STATION
1
347.227.93
2.565.354.33
10+00'
2
3
4
347.210. 75
347.219.78
347. 247.39
2:565.439:93
2,565,464.48
2.565.486.26
11+14.63
11+52.00
10-187.31
5
6
7
347.177.43
347.183.86
347.263.01
2.565.482.42
2.565.48T.33
2.565.506.23
OTOO
10+08.10
10+89.46
NOTES ABBREVATIONS
I. EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED IFSD ONE STORY FRAMED DWELLING
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE MITIGATION AREA. EIPRIW - RGHTI G IRON PIN
AY
2-SEE SHEET 3. FOR PLANTING PLAN d NOTES EL - ELEVATION
STA - STATION
3.SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
FOR EXCAVATION AND GRADING REQUIREMENTS. RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
4. BENCH MARK: -L- STA. 17+07 67' LT SY - SQUARE YARD
R•R. SPIKE IN PP _
ELEV. = 24.73' NAVO 29 - --,- - - -
S.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
BETWEEN PROPOSEDEMARSHNGRADESHTORBEES TO CREATED. AND
EL- 6.26'
711
s,
ro
A9
DATUM DIAGRAM
,y
9
0.35 MLW
0.0 NAVD 29
EDGE OF EXISTING
MARSH
A
H6
PROJECT REFERENCE N0.
"SHEET NO.
- R/W SHEET NO.
I
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYORAOLICS
-
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
NC GRID
Langley and
McDonald, Inc
' NAD 83
nwmm
97-
S5EEEE pp 77
PROFILECH '
-
- SWANSBORO.
'
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION
AREA
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OPERATE ANY
HEAVY MACHINERY IN THIS AREA.
ALL WORK.
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND
REMOVAL OF -
DEBRIS. SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY HAND. , ,
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY
DISTURBANCE
TO -EXISTING WETLANDS VEGETATION IN THIS AREA.
COORDINATE CONNECTION TO EXISTING CONTOUR.
AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
P
I
i
f
OAR
t
2 -
�gg
9215il1 �
41q
-
PIG
N L7 NN555yCIF�'ASTER FABRRRAP
Ni
.(-1.5g01
I
N/F
NY JOSEPH
WALSKI
E� evo
- GRAPHIC SCALE 1"-20'
L&M PRO✓ • 1960024-201..00 L&A1 DWG • J06
I

• t
REVISIONS
Swraa�$oeo Mmya'tiol�l 4s'� I .� caR
N,z 2 adc�WN� A1NS
it/ , fps. 3
OEM���s
.. •.
.
��
�����
..:...
...
T>�iT.1A17.��
IWAS
10W0 I Ins - - -
PROFILE CHANNEL - DITCH PROFILE
WWA
wAqlm
110M
■��ilir�i��i�o�
0��iifiliiHO��
+200
TIVV
STA. 21+96
STA. 22+98
+200 STA. VV21 +46
STA. 22+47
j Langley and McDonald, Inc
-'Y SWANSBORO
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
5•
0.]5
SECTION A -A
N.T.S.
0.]5
L_ 0.50
SECTION B-B
N.T.S.
to•
ai. 15' PCP
EL. 0.50 IMV. O.Z.
t-1.5a1
L
2 2 2
Q. CLASS 5 RIP-R.P FILTER FABRIC
SECTION C-C
N.T.S.
GRAPHIC SCALES:
10RI2. SCALE: 1"=2020 20 40 60
VERT. SCALE: 1 "=4' ^. f _ 12
LAM PHOJ Af 1960029 201. 00 LAM 9)VG AF 30546-8

rope
. of Ex`St�� \GORE 2' P
� EDGE HARSH n
q
c F
-
MNW v\ot\00) q qoiS�U{N ed
E\e p ti nti eo MN
l2 • `� °' e
A H
RS
e vibh , .
Ols-V W_ np m. •��.
A�ege`oW
m
Ol
I
"7 2
4
0.
Alo
-------------
8.07.0'
10.
qj
pop
So
.110
cb
b
V ^� r _ �,

Ks
X7G
,a��ZUG --- -- ---- - --- — - -- -- ---- - -
y 6, - 2-70
-- ---- — Z Z 5'

�YlR. �n9 co
I.?a G `\`` �X�S
OF
r � C� U c1;Ja.G:C cl `y�` GJ ci EDGE M�RSNte� �\7 � - \•
�`Q•5 _ F
lNb
cw
=h ^'• PC;CV• h. 6.0 • - ry
y P^.-1 l.ryx.
It
i 1 1
-�+ow
i j
A p. p, �, wy N/Q f
o:... ati' w" ACc: h b • . lb:! �pSE
so _ . ' y o "'h. ', ^• oil
6 ; If11 xw :bp. tNGNY K\
Of

nor
SO
pGE
lb
010
00)
i• MARSH to v`rr a
`_�, 1 ,.•
:� 'o / IDS A• I _ 9y.'
(� ✓' %ham rCb 1i. ' P' !;ai "J.�'J:'; iIiltil
�-b
ry
- - - - o' _ -' 4 ' w' /� A �• moo' ;b?• t• ;�''• in
.-�} _ - _ tp '`- TQ aO \(C• i • �OA'y. ^ry,OY,\
_ ry v f ^•.CT L PN. K \ 5
a.
co
Cb
flu
Riw

I/W
h
ti
11 h
,',area Disturbed
v' \I• Below MHW
h z
MHW Line N/F
JOHN. R. L
(2.5' Elevation)° LOIS B.JONES
-01
O'
0O' b o� �� •�•�
a
I,�i ICI I �' \ � }p p✓� —_ - -_ _ : _ - � -
r )
E 5
N,:P>
�' •' - T-��f— —W_T` -O — May _ PIS o'• o' hfO
Z . o
1 � :— 0�� - v�•
t
�a aJh - _ — fo°
^,.• pro'.- .'� • . _�-------- �_ .�`�°~. _
h 1 a
_.. _ .. ...I ..4•_.. _. _....___ _._----------
p ra ,7
Area Disturbed
Below MHW
ova
N/F
r
0 JOHN. W
DUDLEY
r)�
Q do oy a� ti ' N Q H W Y
°0 2�4
r= v b•
T
m
o EXIST.EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING R/W
Gi APNC SCALE
1

If
C y
of
I - \IWI Iki
1=1 a
131 ���•
Area Disturbed
Below MHW
Ati
v
h �
MHW Line N
JOHN.
' . R. 6
(2.5' Elevation)o LOIS B.JONES
l ti
1q P O\
ZZ
- - - - - - --
b�
',!,V4
Area
ap,%: Below
' Off• '�' q � _ _ __ __ _ _ _ .O __ _ _ _ �h _
N
f N/F
b0
JOHN. W.
DUDLEY
Q,
I;��^�� q•
7777
u'1 1 ? t 01
a 3 b
v
q PO a• b . \ PROPOSED R/■
-_— - — -_ .�. <i•___.-. ...........
__-y '.'b: _. -.__posy EXISTING R/W
--may ------ =yy - - - - - - - - - - 46
--10 '�y h b •�� q O to
�' 1 L - ----- I -------- '
I
o� ba o -
0 o EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT —
r �
N �
N� HWY �4
m N bb

v o b �•
1 tih ' Area Disturbed
,! Below MHW
'Area Disturbed �¢
Below MHW °
/JDHNMHW Line N.
, R. 6
Elevation) LOIS B.JONES
. A
lb
lb
r c
jyl DWI l � \ ; .P' � � - - - - -p - 'a :=, . ,�:" _ • t.2Q'
c Ip� �\I I �" `� Pam\---_ •�_ _ _ — _ _ __ -0 N/F
IWI ICI ,\�, - - O j�ti /_ - P - _ - O _ _ �h _ 1° JOHN. W.
Dt1DLEv
\ �1
ZLI,' f 1bh y h�P
r ! _1
Ljn ? I 01
� o
� A b
�' a -..ram j—--O� _ M�� Pm a• - _ hb \ PROPOSED R/■
bh 'b, 41
7
°O_.. m._-ay _ EXISTING R_/W
__ - __
"____ _ -
_
_.
c'O
..._.I -0hh 1h �a 1 3ElY
10)
--------'----------'--------------------- -------
-'Z--------- 'a--------- -
�'• D P Nr HWY ?�4
c'--------- 1'--------- 1---°01
----------=-------- (al
vl
0 0 EXIST, EDGE OF PAVEMENT
N N
GRAw"C SCALE
o
b"261 0 2

P
Area Disturbed
Below
MHW
y' i 'Area Disturbed
\• 1 Below MHW 0P
ti
\` y �. N/F
MHW Line JOHN. R. b
LOTS B. JONES
y �h•.'�• �.'I r mom.• �, .---:::=: _ ,.
lY ICI `� !� ' ti°', ^ ; ;� ; ,p• � - - - - - - - - �� �:' _ ,.�s " ' -
I JON/F
�� h _ b0 HN. W.
f I ICI f •,l, °} �� ham' /. s ��r+• o- - .-- � DUDLEY
W, ,✓ _-
m _��$• oN Q a
ZI a N ��ti
1 Ay
t \'\
1 ti
\ jr0 1 , • y'a
r / p.
•, 11 0^
f �.
/A
-_--
...may
�- -
_
—
—-------�'
-
•-
,ram-
—
-_"_- _� •'3'
- -.-�iP-- may. _ _
-
��.--- —_'___'._-
ID
m
ti
T
N
0
y a h
•__________•_________fit_________
o ti o o e
-------------------- m-----------'L•---------'�---"---------�--- -----
m
EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT
-------------------------------
NQ HWY 24
1 10
o_ _________1p'________ to.
PROPOSED R/t
EXISTING R/W

Gb
4-�[o O q O

�ZZ
04z - OS Q lh• +
002,E � gal I
5 1+

w

r op"
ExI,INC P
EpGE MARSH R�
m F \Gv
MNE\e onl plst� W e
l2 •`' ` �� �' e
�e
i Ex vt.IJ,ARSN co / g 1
C� �ry
rbDe h
r eo pest MNW �_ —_ ^' . - �' • '''• .
A ge\o*
o I
h '
't
ct
' � Lap • � y ,'�'�� ; • l u ��"
Io
fi
to �a - • - - - .�..� xn:. 8.0 �. U 0 ^ n •.v� t �pSEP
•\ •�_
gyp:. n • �.,y . lb
•IREy .�• ,...���.:ao a• Riw e
."fin . �..�. . ' .' � O�-�,� . • � \\� •� .
Cb
.. •,: ni a, •fib pper�, b .` ` .:` f`P.

I
Jv � 0 11dN gN�� tind�
Nl �Dy
101 j14N5 ti CO

NCDOT/P&E BRANCH
I
Nov 5 '01 15:25
P. 01
ti
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT` OF TRANSPORTATION
NOCtLAEL F. EASLEY
Go"WWOR'
LYNM TSFM
UDMARY
AX COVER.S1ffE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
BRANCH
DATE: 5 n>W1
NUMBER CALLING a—
NUMBER OF PAGES: 3
Please Deliver the Following.IYiges 14...
Name:
Department or Firm: ` Ncrxr-%
Address or Room Number:
This fax being sent by:
Name: Ct1+kAe �'oc>l
Phone Number:;
NOTES:
Wf-
S"W-T
MAILING ADORESS:
NC DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVE6OPMENT ANO ENNRONMENTAL ANALY5e
15" A"L SERVICE CENTER
RxEO.. NO 27599-7548
TELEPnO-E; 919-733.3147
PAR: 979-r33.9794
WEBSTE' "W.DON.00T.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TR,,B RTATI0M8U1t01MO
1 SOUTH WIlMP1G� nHNC

Ll!z f S Of
CFki:eYG
L,
TCH C''El"IfE LINE
;NA? ES
EASTNG I STATION
cN 6
a
Gy EAST. MARSH \
s •"
- ■v' NlF \
�y+ HAJi0L0 E. &
� ra�y�sN,Q Zl JOAN LKERBER
",,°},. �•••• ya
no , ^\ .h4n
P 'p.
Y o �e
� o .� +T
m
,-
HgEKMOAD
WT.GA'." :RiA, is ?t_T� P � � DATUM DIAGRAM
EDGE OF LXISlm
MARSH
n
Cl
NC GRID 1
NAD B3
Q0
m
a
.
A
a
n
•!
• _�\'�� NOTE.
• 1Eq'
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OP.
NAVY MACHVfEnY IN THIS AREA. ALL I
`f
- ' � 9 •'�
INCLUDING MINOR CRAOMG AND REMOYi'9
tMMS.SHALL BE PERFORMED BY IIAhf�
r f T
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY DISTUF •-
TO EXISTING WETLANDS VEOETANEiT.1ppNN'N�
COORDINATE- COCTION' to -EXISTING
N
r
AS DIRECTED BY EKINEER. I
'A:.T'Cl
ti
ko
/ t
ch
ELF. NIF
�AyFHOhr JOSEPH
KOWALSKI
TORS' -CLASS B-RP RAP
'12 Sy FILTER FABRIC
.UNOE-POOL 10'xl0'1
h5� � SSRr
��I`,, ., . �. � DNA•
O
N
O
1-

I,
EM
nnaL w'
o
u;
�.• �' t,Q NOTFF 90
► ' - CONTRACTOR T•T
1 ANY NACWWJW
IN
COUTRACNALL Z:
nH'r -..r R/F 2r ( 6r CONTRACTOR Z
i •'t: i''� ,,� jam. A. a � O _ � TO EYJSTiN6 1=
LOS U,JONES ■ Al C011
A• �• I{ f ,i 1�' P`L . ry CONTOUR AS
-'..t .:4f i ,♦ 9. EDGE OF EXISTING
MARSH
I. 3 v
`j•L.i' Vey ^" �� AS •. .- _ ! `.•.tl~..� ai -•• ,.•� .•Fp .. f. � W
�ii ._ •W
ko
` 't 4�, fit.' • •,1. 0� ry F m ~t' U OF
i
lTs
GRADING
y
. • d 2.' ,L . �9 .,'.i' •rod' ,'a
(,I�'�•�,� 6wi
nil
ilinlill
GROW scat
y b w V
o
.,
AND o m
E%ISI. EOG£ OF PaYENENi �
a
i t" A1W • /AfGC�•A'ygp

off
11j �0
111
lij y
m iii n
"n iii IV~ -A381- t
D 'nP N > (n
.... N... III -........
.....fit
.....
• Olf
41
AV
^J : •;q . V ^
li,j.. � •., .... p.9..y.... o^'WA •,•...;'�•
s
,�'• ,, � ... ,,.`' •�Ajoff,
qo 1
ti0.
S.. ,
.......

�� ,_�
I�
'I
i�
I
� \ /
\\ .�///
�
�
\
1
1
\\� �� __
_`�/ i�

5

r
�
�
1
FA
il

a
7. Habitat Description: Al}. P,} s . - 4,sk
Coastal Wetlands - Species:
Excavated: for culvert: bridge:
Filled: for culvert: bridge:
404 Wetlands- Deliniated? Species:
Excavated: €er Felve#;-- h*idbp•
for culvert: bridge: road:
Shallow Bottom - -SA-V��
Excavated: for culvert: bridge:
for culvert: bridge: road:
High Ground: Species:
High Ground disturbance: for culverts:
Total CAMA AEC Disturbed:
Total area disturbed by project:
Primary Nursery Area? 4 163 N �
road:
road:
Mft&
road:
bridge: road:
Includes:
Water Classification: 5 J� rk Open for Shellfishing? yes
8. Project Summary:
9. Project Description:
Stabilization:
Rand 5k0U1dUFVVift:
Slepi�it£11j�idt�Y.
Project begins:
Ends:
Page 2
Date:
Location:
Filled:
Filled:

10. Anticipated Impacts: Coastal Wetlands:
Coastal Shoreline (buffers):
Public Trust Waters: .
Shallow Bottom (estuarine waters):
404 Wetlands:
Displaced property owners:
Construction (temporary) impacts:
Erosion:
Turbidity:
Other:
11. Comments and Recommendations:
Possible avoidance and minimization:
Minimization measures proposed:
Recommendations:
Comments:
Page 3
Date:
Location:

00o
06 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: SR 1176 (20" Street), in Crab Point, north of the
Morehead City business district, crossing of Dill's Creek.
Photo Index -2000: Photo # 549, grid 17 P 1995: Photo # 532, grid 7-8 G
State Plane Coordinates x: 2682650 y: 368050
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit-7/9/2001 & 7/10/2001
Was Applicant Present - yes (Jay Johnson, DEO)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 6/14/2001
Office - Morehead City
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Local Land Use Plan -Carteret County
3 p 06d Land Classification from LUP - Urban Transition/Conservation `�
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT, EW, CS, CW V
iciB� (C) Water Dependent: Yes
o r! (D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Roadway, Culvert
Planned - Replacement of culvert, elevation of roadway
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
F.xrnvntPd Fillad
[AREA]
llthor
(A) Coastal Wetlands - Spartlna
alterniflora, Juncus roemerianus,
979 sf
Distichlis s icata
(B) Shallow Bottom
252 sf
168 sf
(C) Other - High ground
13,200 sf
High ground in AEC
6800
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 0.188 acres (0.017 has been previously disturbed)
(E) Total area disturbed by project 0.491 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: Yes
(G) Water Classification: SA HQW
(H) Open for Shellfishing: NO
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the
degraded 48-inch culvert with an 87" by 63" aluminum arch culvert and to raise the elevation of
the road pavement by, 2 feet.
a

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — SR 1176
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is State Road 1176, at the crossing of Dill's Creek in the community of
Crab Point, north of the Morehead City business district in Carteret County. The existing
roadway is approximately 2 feet in elevation labove the normal high water level. The general
purpose of the project is to replace the deteriorating steel culvert with a larger aluminum arched
culvert and to raise the roadway 2 feet, to allow for better flow in Dill's Creek and to stop the
current overwash of the roadway during storm tides.
The culvert crossing at Dill's Creek is flanked with wooded Pine/Gum swamp wetlands, coastal
wetlands and residential lawns. This area is primarily residential. The site consists of a 20' wide
creek downstream of the crossing. The creek narrows at the culvert and is 8 feet wide upstream of
the culvert. The coastal wetland area consists of S artina alterniflora, Juncus roemerianus, and
Distichlis s in cats. The adjacent uplands are residential land and are vegetated primarily with
various pines, oak, gum, myrtle, centipede grass and St. Augustine grass. Soils in the area
include Arapahoe and Augusta fine sandy loams. Dill's Creek is coastal waters at the project site,
and is classified SA HQW by the North Carolina Division Of Water Quality. The area is closed
to the taking of shellfish for consumption, and is designated as Primary Nursery Area by the
North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. The Carteret County Land Use Plan designates the
project area as Urban Transition, with all CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern designated as
Conservation.
The proposal is to replace the existing 48" diameter by 51' long culvert with an 87" by 63"
diameter by 70' long corrugated aluminum structural plate pipe arch (culvert) on the existing
alignment. The roadway will be raised from its current elevation of approximately 2' above the
normal high water contour line to approximately 4' above the same. The additional 19' length of
culvert is required to accommodate the fill slopes for the elevated road. The road pavement will
be widened 2' (to accommodate State and Federal Highway Safety Standards) and the shoulders
will be maintained at the current 10 feet. The slopes have been minimized to a 1 'h: 1 slope with
riprap stabilization. Best Management Practices will be used to minimize erosion and control
sedimentation.
The 30' buffer requirement implemented by the Coastal Resources Commission does not apply to
this proposal, as bridges and culvert crossings were determined to be water dependent uses.
n

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT — SR 1176
PAGE 3
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the replacement of the existing culvert with an aluminum arch culvert and raising
the elevation of the roadway 2 feet will result in the following impacts: Approximately 420 square
feet of shallow estuarine bottom will be excavated and filled by culverts and riprap surrounding
the culverts; approximately 979 square feet of coastal wetlands will be filled for the slopes of the
road shoulders; approximately 739 square feet of the 1399 square feet of impacts will occur to
wetlands and ground that has previously been filled with riprap. Approximately 6,800 square
feet, of the 20,000 square feet of high ground that will be graded, filled or excavated for the
roadway and paving, is in the CAMA Coastal Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern. The
resulting impervious area within the Coastal Shoreline AEC will be an additional 1000 square feet
of paved surface. No navigational use of the area can occur presently, and this use will be neither
expanded nor enhanced. The hydrology of the upstream portion of Dills Creek was greatly
reduced by the original placement of this culvert crossing. The opening of the culvert will
increase by approximately 267 % with this proposal. The NC DOT has reduced the estuarine
system fill impacts associated with this proposal by using steep shoulders to be stabilized with
riprap. There is a high probability of turbidity expected during the replacement of the culvert.
Stringent sedimentation/erosion control measures are proposed to minimize this impact. The
primary use of State Road 1176 is for ingress and egress of local residents. The replacement of
the culvert and raising the road 2 feet will upgrade the crossing to improve safety of traffic
movement and comply with state safety standards for secondary roads.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 0.491 acres.
Bill Arrington July 13, 2001 Morehead City
s„

SWANSBORO MITIGATION SITE
FINAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
T.I.P. Number R-2105 WM
DEC 0 6 2000
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Issued: November 2000

1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a low
marsh compensatory mitigation site at Swansboro, North Carolina. This site will be used
as compensatory mitigation for future impacts to marsh communities and essential fish
habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
The Swansboro Mitigation Site is located on the White Oak River, just north of the
intersection of Elm Street and NC 24 (Figure 1). The site totals 0.63 acre that includes
0.16 acre of existing marsh fringing the high ground. The objective of this project is to
provide for future marsh mitigation credit in the White Oak River basin.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low marsh.
Therefore, this project involves the excavation of uplands to appropriate elevations for
the establishment of emergent tidal marsh. A plunge pool will be constructed at an
existing stormwater outfall along the southern property line. The plunge pool will
provide for the attenuation of stormwater prior to entering the existing tidal mars
White Oak River from the NC 24 stormwater outfall.4 2.0 PROJECT APPROACH 7DEC0 6 2000
The Swansboro site will be designed to maximize the restoration of low, emer of %ilaK
marsh. Therefore, site grading and planting plans attempt to maximize these objectives
while taking into account the constraints imposed by adjacent properties and the existing
marsh. Plan and cross sectional views of the Swansboro site are included as Figures 2
and 3.
Existing on -site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the
vertical positions of planting zones. The plant selection for the mitigation area is
consistent with the flora found on or in the immediate vicinity of the site.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing 0.41 acre site consists of two community types; an upland area previously
partitioned into three residential that is adjacent to NC 24 and an existing tidal marsh with
low and high marsh components.
The upland portion of the site is 0.25 acre in size. The houses existing on the property
have been demolished and removed by NCDOT. A marsh area, totaling 0.16 acre in size,
fringes the existing upland transition and is dominated by marsh species.
Existing site elevations range from 0.58 feet along the lower limits of the existing salt
marsh to 13.87 feet at the NC 24 right of way that occurs along the western boundary of
the site. The average existing site elevation is approximately 7.00 feet.
Swansboro Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 1 of 4

Salinity data provided by NCDOT for the Swansboro area indicates values that range
from a low of 4 ppt to a high of 30 ppt. This broad range is reflective of the local
hurricane activity during the two months for which data was collected (A - --
September 1998).
4.0 PROPOSED SITE DESIGN PDEC 0 6 2000
Stormwater from NC 24 will be attenuated by constructing a 10' x 10' plung pd8 M" ,
the pipe outlet. A proposed 0.5 foot deep channel will connect the proposed plunge poo
to the White Oak River. A concrete headwall will be constructed at the end of the outfall
pipe to retain the existing slope.
Biological benchmarks were established by installing two transects which ran from
lowest to highest elevations within the existing marsh. Sample points were selected
along each transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the low and high marsh.
Plant species were inventoried, and the elevation of each sample point was obtained by
survey. The plant species and elevations selected for the wetland creation project resulted
from the use of the biological benchmarks.
Site grading will be designed to slope down from the proposed NC 24 road right-of-way
to an elevation of 1.20 feet. This elevation was determined to be the approximate upper
limit of the low emergent marsh based on the biological benchmarks collected on -site.
The site will continue sloping downward to an elevation of 0.32 feet. This elevation is
mean low water elevation and the top of bank elevation for the proposed channel.
4.1 Low Marsh
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the construction of a channel through the site.
The channel has been designed to originate from an open -water location along the
northern site boundary and continue throughout the interior of the site toward the western
property line (Figure 2). The bottom of the channel has been set at an elevation of -0.65.
Construction of this channel necessitates extending the channel through a small portion of
the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. As a consequence, 0.012 acre of low marsh will be converted to open water, and
0.028 acre will be impacted by hand clearing. The area converted to open water will be
mitigated for on -site.
The low marsh component of the mitigation site will be planted with smooth cordgrass
(Spartina alterniflora). The elevation of the plantings range from 0.35 to 1.20 feet. The
restored low marsh totals 0.29 acre in size.
4.3 High Marsh
Swansboro Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan
November 2000
Page 2 of 4

A small area of high marsh has been proposed between the low marsh area and the upland
buffer area. The high marsh component, consisting of saltmeadow (Spartina patens), will
be planted at an elevation of 1.20 feet to 2.00 feet. The restored high marsh component
of the site totals 0.04 acre.
4.4 Upland Transition, Zone 4
An upland transition area will exist from the high marsh community to NC 24. This zone
will be located along NC 24 and the eastern property line. Two shrub species, marsh
elder (Iva frutescens) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), will be planted. Bal
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted along NC 24.
5.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES LDEC 0 6 2000
Emergent marsh vegetation will be monitored at randomly located samplA pEME
GIS software. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using
realtime GPS. A minimum of ten 1.0 mZ sample plots will be located in the planted areas.
Vegetation at the site will be monitored for five years, or longer as necessary, following
the completion of planting.
Hydrologic monitoring protocols will involve the use of a surface water monitoring
gauge located within the larger restored area of the site and a second gauge located in
open water seaward of the existing marsh. Hydrologic data will be collected for three
years after construction or until success criteria are met.
6.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the marsh creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f=n,/n,, where f—� frequency, n,= number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and n,= total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=Z�n, where c= average percent cover, E. = the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots. If Phragmites
appears in any monitoring period, in more than two sampling plots, then the NCDOT will
consult with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop potential control measures.
The site will be considered hydrologically successful when the hydrology of the site is
flooded twice daily with elevations and durations consistent with those outside the
mitigation area. Success will be determined from data taken from a surface water
monitoring gauge located in the site. It is expected that the surface water (flooding)
regime will be the same as that measured for the biological benchmarks for smooth
Swansboro Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 3 of 4

cordgrass (Spartina alternii lora), since the plant community's zonation reflects long term
tidal fluctuations.
8.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
Effective fish habitat (EFH) is defined in the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSFCMA) as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for
spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity." Marsh habitat provide areas for
fish spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity.
The NCDOT believes that the Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide
mitigation for future impacts to EFH.
DEC 0 6 2000
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Swansboro Mitigation Site will provide "up front" mitigation credit fbeAtWfe '"
impacts to marsh communities resulting from road projects. The NCDOT understands
that risks are involved in constructing the site without identifying a mitigation "need" at
this time.
As mentioned earlier, impacts to the existing marsh community area necessary to connect
the project hydrologically to the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by
limiting grade work to hand removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.012 acre from
conversion to open water, and 0.028 acre impacted will be disturbed by hand clearing.
The NCDOT will mitigate for conversion to open water on -site, and does not intend to
mitigate for areas impacted by hand clearing.
Table 1 summarizes marsh mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing
Swansboro Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
'Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Swansboro Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type
Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore
S. alternii fora
0.28 acre*
0.14 acre*
High Marsh Restore
S. patens
0.04 acre
0.02 acre
Totals
0.32 acre*
0.16 acre*
"*"indicates that 0.012 acre (at 1:1 ratio) of low marsh has been debited from this total to compensate ror consoucoon reramu
impacts to existing marsh community.
Swansboro Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan
November 2000
Page 4 of 4

rluuAt i
Robinson i
i
�I
to� i � arty/
COA6TAL MANAGE ENT
MOREHEAD
N 1 � if
n �� `•
ti t U Swansbora / 5 ,
// - �� m ua ♦ ; \ "� 1 -Lights Oaybeetoh b'r�J
_ 3
o
bt
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1"=2000'
SWAN55o¢.�o Mcri�,A-naf map �, E-�.�oi Wnr.

,s.
SW41JSP_cP,o tv�t'Sic-,OZY-!J �s�- 1
TIP No alos w
1.1oJEontSE�- �Qc'c>
GV McRS'�
�gtp¢at1oN
McL,1
ftvr aQ ATc"
Er/a�ay
o-erg AG O-fT• To
'V LIMITS OF
GRADING —
CITY OF SWANSBORO
CHANNEL AND DITCH CENTERLINE
CMROINATES
PAVEIAEp OF
PT.#
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
1
2
3
347.22 .93
34 .210. 75
347.219.78
2.565. 4.3
2.565.439.93
2.565.464.48
10+00
10+87.31
11+14.83
4
347. 47. 39
2.565.486.26
11 2.00
347. 177.43
2.565.482.4
1 +00
6
7
347.1 3.86
347.26 .01
2.565.487.33
2.565.506.23
10 8.1
10+89.46
NOTES
1.EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE MITIGATION AREA.
2-SEE SHEET 3. FOR PLANTING PLAN 6 NOTES
3.SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
FOR EXCAVATION AND GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
4.BENCH MARK: -L- STA. 17+07 67' LT
R.R. SPIKE IN PP
ELEV. - 24.73' NAVD 29
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
BETWPROPEEN OSEDEMARSHNGR DESHTORBEES TO CREATED- AND
ABBREVATIONS
IFSO - ONE STORY FRAMED DWELLIN
EIP - EXISTING IRON PIN
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
EL - ELEVATION
STA - STATION
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
Sy - SQUARE YARD
EIP
,hh EXIST. MARSH
N/F
HAROLD E. d
�01 JDAN E. KERRF
6,
EL- 6.26' as
4a
as
as
DI :a
DATUM DIAGRAM
HW
0.35 MLW
0,0 NAVD 29
EXISTING
EIP
1
a6
N/F
'HONY JOSEPH
KOWALSK I
TICH
NC GRID
AD 83
�fao
col
. � O Icn
TIDAL SWANSBORO
METLANDS MITIGATION AREA
AREA,
�` Cqq
l2�
4! t W.t�
DEC 0 6 2000
GRAPHIC SCALE
20
20 1"•20'
- veok22f 20 40 60
L6A/ OAvC . ,70546-A

REVISIONS
swbj,l sops Mrs G^-n"C j 4s`T4_
-T*Ip taQ Q aLos-WM
c;LL1� 3
CI_SIi.1.I:IF.70ra"a
w
r,71,
�ww■��w�ww��w
wr�i�ww�www1w"w
www�w��wwww
�yww�wwww�w��w
��iw��wwwa�ww�w
wwwww.aw�awww��
ww■�ww��e��r�i�ww��
�����www�����w�w
ww■��wf�
.._.
2�
ww�■ww��w���w■�
ww�w�w�w��w��ww��
�
�w�wwwaw�ww��ww�w
w���w�ww■��rr�
���w�ww�www�ww■wwww■�www�wwwra
■
..
ww�w���wwwww�
wwwww��wwwidr�
iw��wwwww���w
wwwwwir���wi�©�
w�w��wowwws��w
10+00
111.
PROFILE CHANNEL
DITCH PROFILE
�www�wwww��ww�ww�wwww��ww
www�www•••
.��w�
■_ww�w��w--.•.
.��ws
w_w_w■�w_w_w_w_s���w
w����_��w_w_��w�sw
ww�ww—w�I�■w
rwww��w■��ww���ww
www■wwww�/��w
ww�ar�■�!�rr-�nr�w��■�/���
wsw�www��www
wwiwa����w��w�w�w
w���i���w��wiw■��
wow���w����www
■iwiill�Maldmm
��ww�w�.wwww�■w■w�ww�w�w■w��w■
■mow
w
i
�■
aww
wtw�w�i
+200
TIVV
STA. 21+96
STA. 22+98
ww��w�iww--.-.
.��ww
www��www--.-.
,vrz��■�
�wC�I.iww�Iwi
ww��ww�wwww�w�o��w��w
��www��w��ra�w�■
ww��w�w��►����ww
w+www�w��■w
t tFie
' I
�ii7�WAN
w�w�iw�����r►�www�ws��iw��w����w��■�
■�w��wwwww�e�.�w■www��w■��-��wwwwww
,
ww��www����■�
w��w��ww���■ww�■
w��awe
awwwwia�aw�
wow©©w�w©
mow
ww�■�wrsa���a�www
ww©ww�es�aww
+200 rl v
STA. 21 +46
STA. 22+47
Langley and McDonald. Inc
I.+... .......M1 Rv.A.1SY.wl.
SWANSBORO
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
0.55
SECTION A -A
R.T.S.
S• EL. 1.0
0.35
L o.so
SECTION B-B
R.T.S.
10'
EY. 15' RCP
EL. 0.50
—� NV. _ o.Y. �-
7 c. c ��J'
12• CUSS 0 RIPy W FILLER FORIC
DEC 0 6 2000
GRAPHIC S
AORIZ. SCALE: 1"=20'0 20 40
VERT. SCALE: 1"=4'
L6N PHO✓ ff 1960024-201. 00 Lam OMG A'

$WA11S'P�o MiZ1�4'SY-y.1 �-
-Tip Np aLcS wl`^
�cMS4Q- ��o
Cc-"�QNIn
cwW tAA W
m' Quv"ct4
liki&AA "
ptc,-GQQAi%'0v4
:W-il
'V LIMITS OF
GRADING —
CITY OF SWANSBORO
CHANNEL AND DITCH CENTERLINE
COORDINATES
PT.# NORTHING EASTING STATION
NOTES
1.EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE MITIGATION AREA.
2.SEE SHEET 3 FOR PLANTING PLAN d NOTES
3.SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
FOR EXCAVATION AND GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
4.BENCH MARK: -L- STA. 17+07 67' LT
R.R. SPIKE IN PP
ELEV. - 24.73' NAVD 29
S.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
BETWEEN TO REMAIN
PROPOSED EMARSHNGRADESHTORBEECREATED- AND
�h
7
D
ABBREVATIONS
PAVDAM OF
EIP
q
�h
EXIST. MARSH
N/F
HAROLD E. &
0'\
JOAN E. KERBI
IFSD
- ONE STORY FRAMED DWELLING
EXISTING
HWAY PIN
RI /W
- RIGHT-OF-WAY
EL
- ELEVATION
STA
- STATION
N/F
- NOW OR FORMERLY
RCP
- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
SY
- SOUARE YARD
i
R/W SHEET NO.
'
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DGE OF EXISTING
,
MARSH
NC GRID
Langley and McDonald, In
ti
NAD 83
�--• �^ ^^�
WN
r.:
h9
^ry
CH
S5EEPRVU..�
EE 77
4
SWANSBORO
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
A
EL- 6.26'
DIDI
DATUM DIAGRAM
2.5 HW.
:1
0.35 MLW
O_n NAVO 29
EIP
6A
K
NOCO NOT TE:
HEAVYMACHINERYIN THIIV THIS AREA. E OR OPERATE
ALL WORK.
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND REMOVAL OF
DEBRIS. SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HAND.
CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE
TO WETLANDSTHIS AREA.
COORDINATEGCONNECTIONVTATIOTOEEXISTINGNCONTOUR.
AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
N/F
HONY JOSEPH
KOWALSKI
46
��
6
L&M
DEC 0 6 2000
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"-20
20 0 40 6j
1960024-20/00 L&M OWG • JO

Re: [Fwd: NC 24 (Section AB) and mitigation sites)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NC 24 (Section AB) and mitigation sites]
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:11:21 -0560
From: Cathy Brittingham <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Tere Barrett <[e-mail]>
CC: Kelly Williams <[e-mail]>
Tere,
Here are some outstanding questions/issues that might come up when you talk to Philli
tomorrow: '
1. At the Cedar Point site, DOT will be creating a new channel through existing
marsh. DOT needs to know how much of the impacts to existing marsh caused by creatio
of the new channel need to be substracted from available mitigation at the site. Kel
and I told Phillip we thought it would be reasonable to subtract the permanent impact
i.e. the channel itself. Temporary wetland impacts caused by machinery, trampling,
etc. in creating the channel would not be subtracted provided that temporarily impact
areas reattain their jurisdictional wetland status. Monitoring of temporarily impact
areas would be a permit condition. I told Phillip I would check to see if you agreed
with this approach. What do you think?
2. Condition #2 of CAMA Permit No. 52-00, NC 24 from Swansboro to west of the NC 58/
24 intersection,
R-2015AA, reads as follows: "Prior to completion of the AA Section of NC 24, the
permittee's mitigation proposal must be
accepted by the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM), in coordination with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ), or the applicant must perform oth
mitigation to replace the loss to
be incurred by this structure, with the approval of DCM, COE and DWQ." DOT proposed
use mitigation at the Bogue
Sound Tidal Marsh Restoration Site. DOT stated in their permit application letter th
they would forward a topographic map
of elevations and planting limits when the information on the site is collected. I
don't think we ever received this
information. Prior to issuing the CAMA permit, you and Kelly expressed some concerns
about whether the Bogue Sound site
provides acceptable mitigation for all of the impacts associated with CAMA Permit No.
52-00. Specifically, there is a
question about -whether they have the right amount of low marsh there to cover their
impacts. If you like, I can take yours and Kelly's recommendations and draft a lette
to DOT explaining our position on the suitability of the Bogue Sound site for
mitigation of impacts associated with CAMA Permit No. 52-00. This is something that
Phillip might ask you about.
I'hope the meeting with Phillip goes well. Please let me know if I can help with
anything.
Have a great weekend!
Cathy
Tere Barrett wrote:
> Don't worry about not attending, Cathy. But I really can't have the meeting on the
> phone before the meeting. The reason I couldn't do it on the phone to start with
> is because I need to look at the plats with Phillip and compare to the app. Really
> not something I can do over the phone with this project. But as a generalization,
> the things that we are going to discuss are the standard issues around a major
> permit - consistency between app and plats; having every part of the development
1 of 4 1
12/15/00 8:15 AM

Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation sites
Subject: Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation sites
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:14:28 -0400
From: Kelly Williams <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Tere Barrett <[e-mail]>
CC: Cathy Brittingham <[e-mail]>,
Doug Huggett <[e-mail]>
Tere:
Yesterday, October 27, 1999, Cathy Brittingham and I attended site
visits to the Cedar Point and Swansboro mitigation sites. The site
visits were led by DOT (Phillip Todd and Randy Wise) and the consulting
firm working on the projects. In attendance were: Wildlife Resources
Commission (William Wescott and David Cox), DWQ (John Hennessy), DCM (me
and Cathy), COE (David Timpy), NMFS (Ron Sechler) and USFWS (Tom
McCartney). I wanted to make you aware of a couple of minor changes to
the concept reports dated July 1999. NCDOT re -iterated that both of '
these sites are for future mitigation.
Cedar Point: _
1. The corrected number for mean high water is 2.50 feet. Mean low
water is 0.35 feet. These were incorrect in the plans.
2. The revised channel depth is 1 foot (an elevation of -0.65 feet)
instead of 2 feet deep at an elevation of -1.65 feet. (page 2). The
side slope of the channel is now 1:4.
3. In figure 2 the channel should be drawn as open all the way
through. Their figure
indicates a constricted area- that's not the intended design any
longer.
4. There was discussion on what kind of credit NCDOT can get for the
small tidal creek channel. It has habitat value and in my opinion
makes
it a better site overall potentially. I don't have a problem adding
it
to the marsh acreage since it's so small. They can't intentionally
make
the channel on future sites wider to avoid having to monitor or plant
them though. The tidal creek or swale channels should be a minimum
size I
to remain open and provide habitat for fish and wading birds, but
should
not be too large for the scale of the site. Monitoring plots will be
randomly located using GIS and GPS to monitor vegetation success.
Plots
falling in the creek/swale should be omitted.
5. Impacts to existing marsh will be minimized by locating the tidal
creek channel outlets at the narrowest points in the marsh. When they
apply for a permit to do this: The small impacts should be
subtracted
from the mitigation acreage available at the site at a 1:1 ratio.
6. This was not brought up at the meeting but we have discussed it
before. They are proposing restoration rather than creation. After
seeing the site I recommend it be considered restoration as well. It
appears that fill
was deposited on this site a long time ago and it quite possibly used
1 of 3 L012? 9/9 I
I

Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation sites
to
be a marsh. This can be re -addressed at the time this project is
permitted as you see fit.
7. They intend to apply for a CAMA major to protect the peninsula on
the
western edge of the property perpendicular to the bridge over the
White
Oak. Areas are actively eroding through to the existing marsh and
this
erosion likely would threaten the integrity of the restored marsh if
this peninsula were left alone. A remnant breakwater is there, but
has
deteriorated. NCDOT intends to come up with a proposal to armor the
peninsula. Ron Sechler recommended an off -shore breakwater as an
environmentally
appropriate method of stabilizing the shoreline of the peninsula. The
reviewing agencies
thought this was a good idea and recommended NCDOT
consult with Tracy Skrabal and/or NC Sea Grant on how to construct an
off -shore breakwater to
make the protection as natural as possible. It was mentioned that DOT
could possibly
create/restore additional marsh behind the breakwater that would count
towards their mitigation
credits. Should they indeed apply for this permit, it should be
strongly recommended that NCDOT discuss options with the Coastal
Federation or NC Sea Grant.
Swansboro site:
1. Same changes for the channel depth and elevation as for Cedar
Point.
2. There has been a change for the tidal creek and stormwater channel
design. The stormwater channel is almost the same as it is in the
plan. There will be an energy dissipating plunge pool and a level
spreader for stormwater before it enters the channel. The tidal creek
is now separate from this channel. The channel is smaller and shorter
than the one in the plan.
3. DOT plans to apply for a CAMA major permit for planned
maintenance/improvements to the
stormwater channel. David Cox is concerned that the stormwater
channel is going to carry
water directly into the river as indicated on the figure in the
current plan, and that current plans
make it look like construction will occur through the existing fringe
marsh to open water. The
consultant stated that existing marsh will not be disturbed, and that
he would revise the plans
for the stormwater channel to more specifically show the contours and
elevation of the existing
fringe marsh. When NCDOT applies for a permit for this site we need to
carefully look at their
plans to be sure they are not impacting an unreasonable amount
of existing marsh and that they are not carrying water directly to the
river without letting it first filter through some buffer vegetation.
4. There were questions about allowing NCDOT to use transplanted marsh
plants for these sites. I have e-mailed Doug and Charles about this
issue. NCDOT says that their method of transplanting is to harvest a 10
square foot area and then move 50 feet away to harvest another area.
Charles' response has been that if the harvesting is in a large area we
2 of 3 10/29/99 8:38 AM

Swansboro and Cedar Point Mitigation sites
would not allow it. I just want to know DCM's position and reasoning.
Do you have any experience with this?
If you have any questions let me know. If you can answer some of these
questions, that would be helpful. Otherwise this is for your
information to keep you updated. I hope you have copies of these
plans. If not, I will tell Phillip to get them to you.
Thanks!
Kelly Williams <[e-mail]>
Wetland Restoration Specialist
NC Division of Coastal Management
DENR
3of3
10/29/99 8:38 Alvf

December
Mr. W.D. Gilmore
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1543
Subject:
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
,1 Nicchhaei F. Easley. Governor
luM1 Illiram G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Envi ent and Natural Resources
J
GreAry J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
DEC 2 1 2001
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
EXEMPTION
Stormwater Project No. SW8 011211
NC DOT TIP NO R-2105 WM
Swansboro & Cedar Point
Carteret/Onslow County
Office
The Wilmington Regional Office received a copy of the CAMA Major Permit Application for constructing
a mitigation site on December 13, 2001. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the
development activities proposed at this time will not pose a threat to surface water quality from stormwater runoff.
The Director has determined that projects that are reviewed and approved by the Division as not posing a water
quality threat from stormwater runoff should not be subject to the stormwater management permitting requirements
of 15A NCAC 2H.1000. By copy of this letter, we are informing you that your prof ect will not require a stormwater
management permit.
If the subject project disturbs five acres or more and has a point source discharge of stormwater runoff, then
it is also subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater discharge
requirements. You are required to have an NPDES permit for stormwater discharge from projects meeting these
criteria. The stormwater rules require the Division to permit the common plan of development, therefore, any future
development on the property, regardless of whether a CAMA Major permit is also required, will require a
Stormwater Management Permit application and permit issuance from the Division of Water Quality prior to any
construction.
If you have any questions or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Linda
Lewis at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
RS/azl: S:\WQS\STORMWAT\CAMA\011211.Dec Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Morehead Cama, DCM
Katrina Marshall, Carteret/Onslow County Inspections
Doug Huggett, DCM
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
N.C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, N.C. 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
800-623.7748

n
J
CEDAR POINT MITIGATION SITE
FINAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
T.I.P. No. R-2105 WM
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Issued: November 2000
DEC 0 7 2000

1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS I I DEC 0 7 2000
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes t caa>s�x8tREti
marsh compensatory mitigation site at Cedar Point, North Carolina. This • CJR
as compensatory mitigation for future impacts to marsh communities and essential fish
habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
The Cedar Point Low Marsh Mitigation Site is located on the northeast side of NC 24, at
the south end of the bridge crossing the White Oak River (Figure 1). The site totals 14.34
acres which includes an upland peninsula, 1.07 acres of upland adjacent to NC 24, and
12.92 acres of an existing tidal marsh community.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on maximizing the restoration of low marsh.
Therefore, this project has been designed to include the following components; 1)
excavating uplands to appropriate elevations for the establishment of low tidal marsh, 2)
constructing a breakwater structure and 3) creating a channel to provide tidal exchange
throughout the mitigation area and insure long-term success.
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH
The Cedar Point mitigation site has been designed to maximize restoration credit of low
marsh. Site design for the Cedar Point mitigation site considers the constraints imposed
by adjacent properties and the existing marsh. A channel has been designed to originate
from an open -water location along the western site boundary, continue throughout the
interior of the site and exit at an open -water location along the eastern property line.
Existing on -site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the
vertical positioning of planting zones, while species selection for each zone is consistent
with the flora found on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Plan and cross sectional
views of the Cedar Point site are included as Figures 2, 3, and 4.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing 14.34 acre site consists of two community types; an upland area that is
adjacent to NC 24 and includes the peninsula area, and approximately 12.92 acres of an
existing tidal marsh with low and high marsh components.
The existing upland portion of the site is dominated by early succession grasses and
shrubs. The area adjacent to NC 24 appears to be irregularly maintained.
Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alternii fora) dominates the existing marsh component of the
site. Other plants that are part of this community include grasses and shrubs such as wax
myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 1 of 4

Existing site elevations range from 0.07 feet along the lower limits of the existing salt
marsh to 7.00 feet +A at the NC 24 right of way that occurs along the southern boundary
of the site. The average existing site elevation is approximately 5.00 feet.
Salinity data provided by NCDOT for the Cedar Point area indicates values which range
from a low of 7 ppt to a high of 30 ppt. This broad range is most reflective of the local
hurricane activity that occurred during the two months for which data was collected
(August to September 1998). Iy1 a Im
4.0 BREAKWATER STRUCTURE Y a DEC 0 7 2000
The existing peninsula protects the existing marsh community from winds b1c W110
across White Oak River. The peninsula will be replaced with a backwaters ctu e"%oRAHE
NAGp ME
The structure will consist of Class I Rip Rap underlain with filer fabric. The location
and a cross section of this structure can be found on Figure 3.
5.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION COMMUNITIES
Two transects were used to established biological benchmarks. These transects extended
from lowest to highest elevations within the existing marsh. Sample points were selected
along each transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the low and high marsh.
Plant species were inventoried, and the elevation of each sample point was obtained by
survey. The plant species and elevations selected for the marsh restoration effort resulted
from the use of the biological benchmarks.
5.1 Low Marsh
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the construction of a channel through the site.
The channel has been designed to originate from an open -water location along the western
site boundary, continue throughout the interior of the site and exit at an open -water
location along the eastern property line (Figure 2). The bottom of the channel has been
set at an elevation of -0.65.
Construction of this channel necessitates extending the channel through a small portion of
the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by limiting grade work to hand
removal. As a consequence, 0.038 acre of low marsh will be converted to open water, and
0.072 acre will be impacted by hand clearing. The area converted to open water will be
mitigated for on -site.
The low marsh component of the site, consisting of smooth cordgrass (Spartina
alternii fora), will be planted within the elevation range of 0.35 to 1.20 feet. This planting
will occur on both the seaward and landward sides of the channel (Figure 2), as well as to
the northeast of the proposed breakwater (Figure 3). The low marsh restoration
component totals 0.38 acre.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 2 of 1+

5.2 High Emergent Marsh
A high marsh area has been proposed above the low marsh areas. The proposed high
marsh area extends on the landward side of the channel as a transition between the low
marsh and upland.
The proposed elevation of the high marsh component lies between an elevation 1.20 to
2.00 feet. Species planted within this community type include saltmeadowi
patens). The high marsh restoration area totals 0.42 acre. i
5.3 Upland Transition OE0 0 7 ""
An upland transition area will be planted above the 2.0 elevation of the high ��{ p�pNAGEMI
7�0 EHEAD
marsh. This zone will be located along NC 24 and the eastern property line.
species, marsh elder (Iva frutescens) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), will be planted.
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) will be planted along NC 24.
6.0 MONITORING
Emergent marsh vegetation will be monitored at randomly located sample plots using GIS
software. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined using realtime
GPS. A minimum of ten 1.0 mZ sample plots will be located in the planted areas.
Vegetation at the site will be monitored for five years, or longer as necessary, following
the completion of planting.
Hydrologic monitoring protocols will involve the use of a surface water monitoring gauge
located within the larger restored area of the site and a second gauge located in open water
seaward of the existing marsh along the east side of the peninsula. Hydrologic data will
be collected for three years after construction or until success criteria are met.
7.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the marsh creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f=nJny, where f= frequency, nx= number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and ny= total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=E jn, where c= average percent cover, E, = the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots. If Phragmites
appears in any monitoring period, in more than two sampling plots, then NCDOT will
consult with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop potential control measures.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 3 of

The site will be considered hydrologically successful when the hydrology of the site is
flooded twice daily with elevations and durations consistent with those outside the
mitigation area. Success will be determined from data taken from surface water
monitoring gauges located in the site. It is expected that the surface water (flooding)
regime will be the same as that measured for the biological benchmarks for Spartina
alternii fora, since the plant community's zonation reflects long term tidal fluctuations.
8.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
Effective fish habitat (EFH) is defined in the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSFCMA) as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for
spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity." Marsh habitat provides areas for
fish spawning, breeding, feeding or growth or maturity.
The NCDOT believes that the Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide comsatory
mitigation for future impacts to EFH. F IV F If
9.0 CONCLUSIONS L
DEC 0 7 2000 ,
The Cedar Point Mitigation Site will provide "up front" mitigation credit for J OWAL MANAGEMENT
impacts to marsh communities resulting from road projects. The NCDOT i luderstallaBEHEAD
that risks are involved in constructing the site without identifying a mitigation "need" at
this time.
As mentioned earlier, impacts to the existing marsh community area necessary to connect
the project hydrologically to the existing marsh. Impacts have been minimized by
limiting grade work to hand removal. Impacts to the existing marsh total 0.038 acre from
conversion to open water, and 0.072 acre will be disturbed by hand clearing. The
NCDOT will mitigate for conversion to open water on -site, and does not intend to
mitigate for areas impacted by hand clearing.
Table 1 summarizes marsh mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing Cedar
Point Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "restoration".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Cedar Point Mitigation Site
Mitigation Type Species Planted
Mitigation Area
Mitigation Credits
Low Marsh Restore S. alternii fora
0.34 acre*
0.17 acre*
High Marsh Restore S. patens
0.42 acre
0.21 acre
Totals
0.76 acre*
0.38 acre*
"•" indicates that 0.038 acre (at L t ratio) of low marsh has been subtracted from this total to compensate for construction related
impacts to existing marsh community.
Cedar Point Mitigation Site November 2000
Final Mitigation Plan Page 4 of It

FIGURE 1
�1�
I
7.,
V� 3Y
!J t SEC 0 7
•f SACI
IXXSo msoni 11 A C_
`
�o Pt
am
is
'
{\ i •
•�\ p \ if <n eee�
n �.a• °aoo � 1 I 3y ,�
u. .�•. ` ..o 17 J I `< �
n � as• � - � I 1�� Isla
2
�•'Swansboro
� s
ah o
oli is DayDeaYk
it
coe
\\\
Dots
=r �
4. c e r "1� a .�� t, • � ...
Light
a _. >,_, �.: .ter__•. r
SOURCE: USGS SWANSBORO & HUBERT, NORTH CAROLINA 7.6 MINUTE QUADRANGLE. SCALE: 1"=2000'
C,p(ZpI0j.M MITIeATiW �jP �• Q—.i�OSWM

NO.
(` M2_ S;%TC.
TAP n�o. E-aLcSWM
ticuF.onl�Ci 2 �
�, Cav Psc�
CC.MIH.U�.fl� TCF�'C-
¢Jt,StOQ.C1TiOAi
Q,43tfR.�TSCN
EXISTING R/W
R/X SnGti rvo.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
Iw
IR
z
DEC D 7
i
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
MOREHEAD
CEDAR POINT
TIDAL WETLANDS MITIGATION AREA
/P CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MOVE OR OPERATE
O-
�� ANY MACHINERY IN THIS AREA. ALL WORK.
INCLUDING MINOR GRADING AND REMOVAL OF
DEBRj RFORMED BY HAND.
CONTRACTOR LSHALL BE EAVO D ANY DISTURBANCE
TO EXISTING WETLANDS VEGET+ IN THIS
AREA. COORDINATE CO NECTIONATION TO EXISTING
I CONTOUR, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
i�
N/F
JOHN. W.
DUDLEY
OF �i1R4
% _aL
.II
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING R/W
I. SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR EXCAVATION -
GRADING REOUIREMENTS. GRAPHIC SCALE P-20
2. BENCH MARK: -L- STA. 67-04 43' RT 20 20 40 60
R.R. SPINE IN PP
ELEV.= 5.68' NAVO 29
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
EXISTINGBETWEEN GRADES TO REMAIN
PROPOSEDMARSH GRADES TO BECREATAND
ED.

r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
9 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
January 14, 2002
NC Department Transportation
Mr. W.D Gilmore
1548 Mail Service Center JAN 1 b 2002
Raleigh, NC 27699-1543
SUBJECT: Approval of 401 W`atef Quality and
Additional Conditions
DOT Mitigation at NE corner of
Bridge from Cedar Point to
Swansboro
DWQ Project # 011850
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions (WQC # 3274) to conduct the
following activity at the NE corner of the bridge from Cedar Point to Swainsboro in Carteret County. This
approval allows you to:
1). Replace a degraded breakwater;
2). Remove existing fill to restore low marsh,
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA application
dated December 10, 2001 received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). After reviewing your
application, we have determined that General Water Quality Certification Number 3274 covers this activity.
This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit when the NC Division of Coastal Management
issues it. Please keep in mind that there may he additional Federal, State or Local regulations applicable to
your project, such as (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations and Coastal Stormwater. In addition, this approval will expire when the
accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your CAMA
application dated December 10, 2001. If you change or modify your project, you must notify the Division
(DWQ) in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the
additional conditions listed below:
1). Turbidity controls must be maintained during the project construction so that turbidity does not
exceed 25 NTUs outside the project area.(i.e,Turbidity curtains). Please contact this Office at the number
listed below if there are any problems with turbidity,
2). The attached Certificate of Completion (COC) must be submitted to the Division upon final
construction of the site.
Ex127 Cardinal Drive t., Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
IJ`GbENR

Page Two
Mr. W.D Gilmore
January 14, 2002
Please notify this Office at the number listed below if any problem arises during the construction of the
project that may affect water quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the DWQ Permit # 011850 under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Joanne Steenhuis or Rick Shiver at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
J Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
Attachments: GC # 3274
Certificate of Completion
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office — Henry Wicker
WiRO- Joanne Steenhuis
401/WVetland Unit, Central Office — Cyndi Karoly
CAMA Morehead City — Bill Arrington
CAMA Raleigh — Doug Huggett
Central Files

tile:///Untitled
Cathy Brittingham wrote:
Hi Dave,
RE: your question about the status of DCM's review of the CAMA major
permit
application for the Cedar Point and Swansboro mitigation sites.
Tere Barrett, DCM Field Representative, met with Phillip Todd on
December 15th about sevo* DOT mitigation sites, including the CAMA
major permit application or the Cedar Point and Swansboro mitigation
sites. Tere wrote a follow-up letter to Phillip on December 18, 2000 in
which she stated that.she and Phillip went through the application and
plats for both sites. Tere states in her letter that she and Phillip
discussed the requirements for plats for this type of project, and the
necessity for two complete applications (beyond the MP-1 sheet) since
the proposal is for two distinct creation sites in two different
counties. Tere further states in her letter that the CAMA major permit
application for the Cedar Point and Swansboro mitigation sites is on
hold until completed information is received.
DCM has not received any additional information from DOT about the Cedar
Point and Swansboro mitigation sites since Tere and Phillip met on
December 15th. DCM's permit review will not officially begin until the
CAMA permit application is accepted as complete by the DCM Field
Representative.
Cathy Brittingham
Transportation Project Coordinator
NC Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
[phone] X238 phone
[phone] FAX
1 of 1 3/20/01 4:43 PM

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Southeast Regional Office
9721 Executive Center Drive N
St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 w
August 27, 1999
Colonel James W. DeLony
District Engineer, Wilmington District
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention David Timnv
Dear Colonel DeLony:
Please reference the August 16,1999, letter from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
requesting comments on the Concept Reports submitted for the proposed Swansboro and Cedar
Point Tidal Wetlands Mitigation Area. These sites located in Onslow and Carteret County
respectively, would provide tidal marsh mitigation for ongoing and future highway projects
impacting wetlands within the White Oak River Basin. In accordance with the March 23, 1999,
letter from the Wilmington District concerning coordination under the NEPA/Section 404 joint
processing memorandum of agreement, we have reviewed the Concept Reports and offer the
following comments for your consideration.
Swansboro Tidal Wetlands Mitigation Area
This site involves the grading of uplands to create a 0.26-acre intertidal emergent marsh with a tidal
creek component bisecting the site. While we support the utilization of this site, the creation of a
marsh from uplands is generally regarded as having greater risk than a marsh restoration site. The
project also includes a storm water retention pond (forebay) which would be used to intercept run-off
from the highway and encourage settlement of suspended sediments prior to discharge into the White
Oak River. While we agree with the general concept of the proposed mitigation plan, there are
several aspect of the proposal that need clarification.
It is unclear how the presence of the storm water retention pond (forebay) may affect the
marsh mitigation site or the White Oak River. Additional information regarding the
functions of and objectives associated with this feature should be provided in the mitigation
plan for this site. If the storm water retention pond is intended to improve water quality, its
function could be enhanced by directing all flow through the created marsh. Additional
explanation as to why it is not designed in this manner should be provided in the mitigation
plan.
wo-w

2. We support the inclusion of an intertidal creek feature in the mitigation site design.
However, complete details regarding the dimensions of the creek (e.g., length, width, etc.)
should be provided in the mitigation plan. Also, rather than constructing the creek at -2 feet
throughout its length, we recommend the standard procedure of sloping the bottom in the
direction of tidal flow. This should improve flushing and provide a wider range of habitat.
3. The use of biological benchmarks to determine the planting elevations for selected marsh
species is encouraged. Our experience indicates that low marsh species such as Spartina
alternii fora may only vegetate the upper two thirds of the intertidal zone. Unvegetated areas
will provide shallow benthic habitat of value to fishes. However, because any unvegetated
areas will be included in the sampling strategy, their presence could make compliance with
the performance criteria more difficult.
4. Construction of the site will require the removal of a large quantity of material. The
mitigation plan should address how a silt curtain or other erosion control features will
prevent sediments from reaching the natural marsh fringe on the waterward edge of the site.
5. On page 2, mean low water elevation is stated as 0.32 in paragraph 5 and as 0.35 in
paragraph 7. This discrepancy should be explained in the final mitigation plan.
6. Bald Cypress is proposed to be transplanted in Zone 4 of the mitigation site. Since this is
an estuarine rather than a riverine environment, we question whether this is the best species
for this site. The final mitigation plan should consider an alternative tree if a tree component
is desired in Zone 4.
In view of the fact that the target vegetation is an intertidal emergent marsh species, we
question whether placing a foot of topsoil throughout the low marsh planting area is
advisable or cost effective. We do support the use of topsoil in Zones 3 and 4.
8. Regarding the proposed Monitoring Procedures found on page 4, we offer the following
comments:
A. No indication is given regarding the season and frequency of vegetative or
hydrological monitoring. If vegetation monitoring is to occur at the end of the
growing season this should be stated in the mitigation plan.
B. No information is given regarding how the visual estimates of cover will be
determined. We suggest use of the Braun-Blanquet sampling techniques for
monitoring marsh mitigation sites.
C. Within one month following each monitoring effort, a report of the findings should
be provided to the Corps of Engineers (COE) for circulation and review.

D. The monitoring plan should include a contingency plan regarding how issues such
as inadequate tidal flooding or failure of the transplants will be addressed. Based on
coordination with the COE concerning their marsh creation sites, we recommend that
if at any time during the monitoring effort, the calculated frequency value falls below
0.7, replanting will be discussed by the resource agencies and a consensus will be
reached regarding the need for replanting.
E. Based on guidance provided by our Beaufort Laboratory, we suggest that a minimum
of 30 samples be taken at the site for the first three years of monitoring. The
laboratory staff has agreed to provide further analysis of how the size of the restored
area may influence the required sample size.
9. We recommend that the mitigation plan consider conducting hydrological monitoring and
demonstrating success prior to transplanting of intertidal vegetation at the site. This would
allow for site stabilization and ensure that the target elevations have been achieved prior to
additional effort (e.g. transplanting marsh).
10. The source of emergent marsh and other transplants should be provided in the mitigation
plan. We recommend that for emergent marsh, transplanting be harvested in nearby natural
marshes if possible. This recommendation is based on coordination with the COE regarding
their marsh creation efforts indicating that using local stock improves the chances of
transplant survival and growth.
11. The mitigation plan should include information regarding the season during which
transplanting will occur. For emergent marsh, we recommend transplanting occur during the
period of March thru June.
12. Table 2 depicts the acreage of each habitat type except open water habitat. We recommend
that this acreage be added to the table. Also, the mitigation plan should recognize that inkind
mitigation requirements dictate that four different habitat types are provided by this
mitigation site.
Cedar Point Tidal Wetlands Mitigation Area
This site involves the grading of upland to create a 1.07-acre intertidal emergent marsh with a tidal
creek component bisecting the site. We support the utilization of this site. Except for the size,
location, and construction f a stone water retention pond, this site is very similar to the Swansboro'
Tidal Wetlands Area. Therefore, our comments above also pertain to this site.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on this work. If we can be of finiher assistance,
please advise.
Sincerely,
r.
Andre // Mager, Jr.•
Assistant Regional Administrator
Habitat Conservation Division
cc: FWS, ATLA, GA
FWS, Raleigh, NC
EPA, ?.TLA, GA
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC
NCDENR, Morehead City, NC
NCDOT, Raleigh, NC
F/SER4

September 7, 1999
Phillip Todd
NC Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 2761 1-5201
Phillip:
This letter follows your request for comments on the Swansboro Marsh Mitigation Site, Concept Report dated
July 1999.
1. This plan describes the creation of 0.23 acres of low emergent tidal marsh and 0.03 acres of high marsh with
the inclusion of an open water channel. The proposed site design seems to adequately describe the planned
marsh creation and should provide for a total of 0.26 acres of mitigation. Since no ratios are described in the
plan, I will assume this detail will be discussed at the time the site is proposed for use. Since the action
proposed is creation, I would recommend a ratio of 3:1 for this site. Also, although the impacts from this
marsh creation to the existing marsh at the Swansboro site are small, you will likely be required by DCM under
CAMAto add these marsh impacts to your impacts associated with the NC 24 highway construction project.
2. Monitoring the hydrology on the site for "no more than one year' is not acceptable. Most marsh sites'
hydrologic regimes are monitored for a minimum of three years or until success criteria are met whichever is
longer. If you have specific reasoning behind this shortened monitoring time, please explain. DCM
recommends a monitoring period of three to five years for hydrology mainly for the purpose of monitoring the
sites' hydrologic stability, especially in the vicinity of the open water channel.
Although the marsh creation proposed seems to be suited for this particular site, DCM's support of the
creation of wetlands on this site will be determined during the LAMA permit review process once a permit
application has been submitted by NCDOT. Tere Barrett of DCM's Morehead City office, is the Coastal
Management Representative that will handle the CAMA permitting for this mitigation site. The above
comments are general comments on the proposed marsh creation and success criteria. Any questions
regarding whether this site can be accepted as mitigation for the impacts from the widening of NC 24 will need
to be addressed to Ms. Barrett.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources James B. Hunt Jr., Governor • Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Coastal Management Donna D. Moffit, Director
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 • Phone [phone] • htip•J/dcm2.enr.state.nc.us

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this plan. If you have any questions about these comments
please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kell PWS
Wetland Restoration Specialist
cc: Tere Barrett, NCDCM, Morehead City
Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington

September 7, 1999
Phillip Todd
NC Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 2761 1-5201
Phillip:
This letterfollows your requestfor comments on the Cedar Point Marsh Mitigation Site, Concept Report dated
July 1999.
1. This plan describes the creation of 0.29 acres of low emergent tidal marsh and 0.03 acres of high marsh with
the inclusion of an open water channel. The proposed site design seems to adequately describe the planned
marsh creation and should provide for a total of 0.32 acres of mitigation. Since no ratios are described in the
plan, I will assume this detail will be discussed at the time the site is proposed for use. Since the action
proposed is creation, I would recommend a ratio of 3:1 for this site. Also, although the impacts from this
marsh creation to the existing marsh at the Cedar Point site are small, you will likely be required by DCM
under CAMA to add these marsh impacts to your impacts associated with the NC 24 highway construction
project.
2.Monitoring the hydrology on the site for "no more than one year" is not acceptable. Most marsh sites'
hydrologic regimes are monitored for a minimum of three years or until success criteria are met whichever is
longer. If you have speck reasoning behind this shortened monitoring time, please explain. DCM
recommends a monitoring period of three to five years for hydrology mainly for the purpose of monitoring the
sites' hydrologic stability, especially in the vicinity of the open water channel.
Although the marsh creation proposed seems to be suited for this particular site, DCM's support of the
creation of wetlands on this site will be determined during the CAMA permit review process once a permit
application has been submitted by NCDOT. Tere Barrett of DCM's Morehead City office, is the Coastal
Management Representative that will handle the CAMA permitting for this mitigation site. The above
comments are general comments.on the proposed marsh creation and success criteria. Any questions
regarding whether this site can be accepted as mitigation for the impacts from the widening of NC 24 will need
to be addressed to Ms. Barrett.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources James B. Hunt Jr., Governor • Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Coastal Management Donna D. Moffitt, Director
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 • Phone [phone] • httpl/dcm2.enrstate.nc.us

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this plan. If you have any questions about these comments
please call me at (9 19) 733-2293.
Sincerely,
Aellyilli PWS
Wetland Restoration Specialist
cc: Tere Barrett, NCDCM, Morehead City
Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington

JJ I UC Lu w Ro "; ' C YIU. NUp0 rCK
Mardi 3, 1999
Philip Todd
NCDOT
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ii71Ifr.Si
This letter is concerning your request for comments on the Deer Creek Tidal Wetlands M'digation
Site, final Concept Report dated January 1999.
StormvAer Management Plan:
Though I know very little about the plan and site as it was originally proposed, I have been informed
that this plan is much more "ernrironmentaliy friendly" and fits better into the surrounding habitat on
E the site.
Wetland Mitigation Area:
1. The site's current conditions are unclear in this plan. 1 have not visited the site as I was unaware of
the January on -site meeting. It would be helpful if the plan included figures depicting the current
elevations in both plan and section views and perhaps a photo or two showing the current she
conditions. Photos of the reference area(s) should also be included. it is diffrcultto determine from
this plan whether the proposed work is wetland restoration or creation. If both creation and
restoration areproposed, the plan should outline the areas of each type of mitigation and include the
proposed acreage of each if the site was never a marsh (within the past 20 years or so), then all
references to restoration in the plan should be changed to creation.
' 2. The plan should more clearly define exactly what actions are proposed for the soils on the site.
The plan states that the topsoil wi0 be reserved pending the results of the soils nutrient test What is
h the condition of the soils now? What amendments are proposed if the soils are unsuitable for marsh
vegetation (fertilizer, organic matter)?
3.1 would caution against relying on a single monitoring wen. The use of a single well has a few
drawbacks not the least of which is the loss of data due to the failure of the well. Since success Is
based party on this well data, a Ioss of data could result in the inability to meet the proposed success
criteria. The plan should indicate where the well(s) will be located.

77 IUt lu:4r ID; 11 NUM M.70.J rn
4. Monitoring reports should include color photos of the created/restored areas to clearly depict the
site conditions from year to year.
5.50% coverage after five years would not be a successful vegetation effort in my opinion. After Ave
years In the ground, a wCCessful marsh creation or restoration should cover substantially more area
than this plan proposes.
6. A contingency plan should be induded in case the success criteria are not met. The actions
proposed should be clearly stated for each of the proposed success criteria (i.e. a contingency plan for
vegetation, hydrokV, etc.).
r The proposed marsh creation/restoration greatly enhances the stormwater management aspect of this
site. Atthough the marsh creation/restoration areas proposed seem to be suited for this particular site,
_ it is not possible for DCM to allow the generated credits from this site to be held for future use with
any =r c guarantee that DOT can use them on a future project. It is uNikely, however, that, if this
site meets the approved success criteria. DCM would find this site unacceptable for up -front mitigation
for in -kind impacts to wetlands in the vidnity of this mitigation area Again, because the Deer Creek
Site is not proposed as compensatory mitigation for specific impacts, it is not possible for DCM to
-guarantee granting mitigation credtfor this site for unspecified impacts atthis point. Afthough there is
some risk involved in NCDOT constructing an up -front mitigation site without a guarantee that it can
be used for future impacts, I support the construction of this site provided any necessary permits are
obtained and the above mentioned items are addressed. Please be aware that even with approved
wetland mrogWon banks, use of the bank for specific impacts to wetlands is considered on a case -by -
case basis. I believe this site would receive similar consideration if proposed as mitigation for future
impacts.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this plan. Please let me know if another site visit is
planned in the future. I look forward to the final mitigation plan.
Sincerely,
Kglly Williams
Wetland Restoration Specialist
CC! Scott McLendon, UCACE
Tare Sarrvtt, NCDCM
Ron Sechler, NMFS