NCDOT 115-87 Eastman Creek

PcrmirClar r t Permit Number
New STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 115_87
Department of Natural R ntlnCommunity Development
Sion
❑X �e I nt'inii _ onmental
Conc Ad.
QX Excavatiort�p�fib) ' yptYssuafit to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Dept. of Transportation, Div. of Highways, P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611
authorizing development in Carteret Countyat Eastman Creek, off of SR 1161 in the
Wi regrass Community as requested in the permittee's application dated 3/18/87 including
attached plats, sheets �1i-4 of 4 dated 2/87.
This permit, issued on 4/� / � , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applica a regu�, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may subject
permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
(1) In order to protect juvenile shrimp populations, no excavation or filling
will be permitted between April 1 and September 30 of any year without the
prior approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
(2) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in any marsh or
surrounding waters outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on
the plat.
(3) The disturbed areas will be properly graded and provided a ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion within 30 days of project completion.
(4) The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction -related
discharge (increases of 25 NTUs or less are not considered significant).
NOTE: The permittee and/or his contractor is urged to meet with a representative
of the Division of Coastal Management and/or the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers prior to project initiation.
NOTE: The proposed project is certified under General Water Quality Certification
No. 1734 issued 8/28/84 for bridge replacement.
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee
or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification
not covered hereunder requires further Departmental
approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 1990
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina
agrees that your project is consistent with the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DNRCD and
the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
David W. Owens, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Pernittee

�v JAN 2 9 1998
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOISON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 21, 1998
Mr. Charles Jones
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Div. of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Sir:
The Annual Monitoring Report for the SR 1161 mitigation site is attached hereto. The mitigation site is
located in Carteret County, 0.15 miles south of the intersection of SR 1162 and SR 1161. Mitigation
involves planting the marsh grass species Juncus roemerianus. Success Criteria calls for a 50% survival
rate of both species and 50% area coverage after two years.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] ext. 209.
Since
Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Planning and Environmental Branch
attachment
cc:
Mr. Scott McLendon
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ms. Cyndi Bell
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

i
lavid Franklin
krmy Corps of Engineers
Sox 1990
ington, NC 28402-1890
JAN 2 9 1998

JAN 2 9 1998
ANNUAL REPORT for 1997
SR 1161 Mitigation Site
Careret County
Project 6.16228
Widening of SR 1161
Prepared by:
Permits and Mitigation Unit
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
January 1998

SR 1161 Wetland Mitigation Site
I
JAN 2 9 1998
I M DeL.orme.

SR 1161
JAN 2 9 1998
y offi�

DIY
2)7L9/7 199; ��� •
A w•.! +
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA II
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April4, 1997
Mr. Charles Jones
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Div. of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Sir:
The Annual Monitoring Report for the SR 1161 mitigation site is attached hereto. The mitigation site is
located in Carteret County, 0.15 miles south of the intersection of SR 1162 and SR 1161. Mitigation
involves planting the marsh grass species Juncus roemerianus. Success Criteria calls for a 50% survival
rate of both species and 50% area coverage after two years.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (919) 733-78" ext. 209.
attachment
cc:
Mr. Scott McLendon
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ms. Cyndi Bell
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Sincerely,
eL.-S"�
Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Planning and Environmental Branca
Not

1. SR 1161 Mitigation Site
Annual Report for 1996
I. Project Description
The site is located 0.15 miles south of the intersection of SR 1162 and SR 1161 in
Carteret County. The 0.38 acre site was planted with Juncas roemeramrs.
II. Project Association
This mitigation project offsets marsh wetland impacts associated with the widening of SR
1161 (Project Number 6.162228).
III. Proiect History
Spring 1995
Giaded and Planted
September 1995
Vegetation Monitoring
June 1996
Site Replanted
October 1996
Vegetation Monitoring
IV. Success Criteria
• 50% survival rate of planted species
• 50% area coverage
n

V. Results (See Wetland Mitigation Report - Vegetation, for more i4formation)
No monitoring plots were established. By visual observation, the plants have failed. The
site was originally planted with Juncus. At the time of first monitoring, the plants
showed signs of stress, and the site was replanted the following spring. At that time, the
drainage was improved slightly by cleaning the outlet ditch. Soil tests were taken at
intervals from original planting to present. The test reveled signs of stagnate and trapped
tidal water, but no toxicity problems. The vegetation failed again after the second
planting. The elevation of the site may be slightly low.
VI. Summary
The site consists of approximately 0.38 acres of brackish marsh creation. To date, the
vegetation continues to fail.
VII. Proposed Remedial Action
The NCDOT Mitigation Unit of the Planning and Environmental Branch will propose
compensatory mitigation at another site or debiting to a bank.

s a a TUE
7 1987
State of North Carolina --_---"`--------
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor June 10, 1987 David W. Owens
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
Mr. T. L. Waters, P. E.
Asst. State Highway Administrator
N. C. Dept. of Transportation
Division of Highways
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Waters:
This letter is with reference to your application for a Coastal Area
Management Act Major Development and State Dredge and Fill permit to replace
bridges 81, 87 and 88 on SR 1161, bordering the head of Eastman Creek,
Carteret County. Although processing of your application is nearing
completion, additional time is needed for this office to complete the review
and make a decision on your request. Therefore, it is necessary that the
standard review time be extended. An additional 75 days is provided by G. S.
113A-122(c) which would make August 23, 1987 the new deadline for reaching a
decision on your request. However, we expect to take action prior to that
time and will do so as soon as possible. In the interim, if you have any
question on the status of your application, do not hesitate to contact this
office.
Very Sincerely,
4JOi��W-Rarker, Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
GCM:jr/aw
cc: Nelson Paul
DCM-Morehead City
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Eoual Oprominim Affirmative .Action Emp1mrr

P -77 L F,�,
PLANNING COMMISSION
0--sm- M-0 asnow
P. O. DRAWER 630
BEAUFORT, N. C. 28516
CARTERET COUNTYCOURTNOUSE
May 8, 1987
Mr. Nelson Paul
CAMA
P.O. Box 769
Morehead City, N.C. 28557
Dear Nelson:
In reference to your letter concerning N.C. D.O.T.'s work related to
bridge replacement in Carteret County and how this activity may be inconsistent
with the County Land Use Plan, I am of the opinion that this would not be
contrary to the stated policies of protecting coastal wetlands since this
is an upgrading of an existing public roadway structure. I feel confident
that the county would not want to impose more restrictive standards than
those established by the state when permitting road development projects.
Therefore, the county does want the wording in our Land Use Plan to be
interpreted in a similar fashion as current state regulations are applied.
If you require more information, please don't hesitate to give me a
call.
S' cerely, /
Gary Fergus
Planning Director
GF:lcv

MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
John Parker
Nelson G. Paul
Comments on pending application of N.C. DOT.
Bridges 81, 87, 88, Wiregrass Community
May 5, 1987
These projects, individually, involved the excavation and filling of
moderate amounts of marsh and unvegetated subaqueous substrate. These
projects are typical of small bridge replacement projects in coastal
North Carolina.
The applicants have designed.the projects to use a headwall retaining
system on both sides of the roadway in order to minimize excavation
and filling requirements. The proposed width of the culverted
crossing is the minimum necessary to construct a safe road passage.
Some minor constriction of waterflow should be expected by using the
aluminum arched culverts versus structures similar to the existing
bridges. This is not expected to be a constriction serious enough to
hamper the productivity that occurs in the tributary headwaters.
Because of this the added expense of replacement bridges (similar to
the Russell Creek project) ds not a justifiable requirement.
Carteret County has some wording in the county Land Use Plan that
suggests public roadways should not be`allowed in coastal wetlands.
We have written the county about this and are hopeful that this only
pertains to new public roadways and not to refurbishing existing
public systems.
If the problems with the county can be sorted out, I have no
objections to the project as proposed as long as the following
conditions are met:
1. In order to protect juvenile shrimp populations no excavation
or filling will be permitted between April 1 and September 30 of
any year without prior approval of the Division of Coastal
Management.
2. No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time in
any marsh or surrounding waters outside of the alignment of the
fill area indicated on the plat.
r
3. The disturbed areas. will be properly graded.and provided a
ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion within 30 days of
project completion.

4. The permittee and/or his contractor is urged to meet with a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management and/or the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to project initiation..

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street e Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor David-W. Owens
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Field Services Section Director
P.O: Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
9.1i9 726-7021-
May 5, 1987
Gary Ferguson
County Planner
Courthouse Square
Beaufort, NC 28516
Dear Gary-:
This office is reviewing an application for state permits•by
the N.C. Department of Transportation to .replace three bridges in
the Wir-egrass Community off Highway 101 on SR 1161 at the. head of
Eastman Creek in Carteret County. The application proposes
alteration of coastal wetlands marsh in conjunction with the
bridge replacement and this may be inconsistent with the Carteret
County Land Use Plan. Clarification is needed from you as to the
intent of the county on a particular statement.
The 1985 version of the Carteret County Land Use Plan
discusses the coastal wetland AEC beginning on page 106. The
county plan describes this AEC, discusses its significance,
designates a management objective and then establishes use
standards to be followed in development of these wetlands. on
page 10.8 the unacceptable uses include "public and private roads
and highways". Corresponding state standards restrict "private
roads and highways" (15NCAC 7J.0205(d)) from coastal wetlands,
however, this is not extended to activities considered to be
upgrading of existing public roadway structures.
The proposal by,.NCDOT is enclosed for your review. This
office needs to know if the county desires the wording in their
Land Use Plan to be interpreted and applied the same as the
corresponding state regulations are applied.or is some other
interpretation intended by this statement. Your advice on how
this proposal should be treated consistent with. the intentions of
P.O.Tox 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Gary Ferguson
Page two
May 5, 1987
the county will be most appreciated. Your response by or prior
to May 29 will help us meet our legislative deadline for permit
decision.
If you have any questions concerning this, or any other
related matter, please feel free to contact me at my Morehead
City Office.
Cordially yours,
Nelson G. Paul
Field Consultant
cc: John Parker
Preston Pate, Jr.

MEMO
Gate:
TO: C R- J /VeO�D Jam/ Subject:
<d+ 6/ .t"O C-r " -
r7l/
t�i. J`ins /'ct t.
PAP
Xnp�
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources & Community Development
Division of Coastal Management

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor David W. Owens
S. 'Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
April 13, 1987
Mr. John R. Parker, Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
Office of Coastal Management
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Parker:
The attached copy of an application submitted by:
Bridges 81 87 88
App scant s Name
Wi ragraaa (•nmmnni+fir ['ar r
Location of Project County
X
for a
State permit to
perform excavation and/or fill
work
in coastal North
Carolina and
for a CAMA major develop-
ment
permit...
for a
CAMA major development permit
(only) ...
ieing forwarded
ter application
g interest
be affected by
the reverse
C e f
�C I K tX.n e�Q uJI ISM n
An Equal Opportunity AHirmauve Amon Employer

(A) this agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
(B) This agency has no comment on the project as proposed.
(C) This agency approves of the project (or project concepL-) and/or recommends
these minor refinements for project management.
(D) This agency objects to the project and recommends permit denial based on a
finding of:
(1) adverse impacts under G.S. 113-229(e) 1-5 (the dredge and fill law)as
enumerated below:
(e)0 ) ... that there will be significant (e)(2) ... that there will be signifi-
adverse effect of the proposed dred- cant adverse effect on the value
ging and filling on the use and enjoyment of the property of
of the water by the public; any riparian ormers;
(e)(3) ... that there will be significant (e)(4) ... that there will be signifi-
adverse effect on public health, cant adverse effect on the con -
safety, and welfare; servation of public and private
water supplies;
(e)(5) that there will be significant
adverse effect on wildlife or
fresh water, estuarine or marine
fisheries;
(1) Inconsistency with Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission
as enumerated in 15 NCAC 7H (or other). Please site
rule.
(3) Inconsistency with the local Land Use Plan (Please elaborate).
(4) Inconsistency with Rules, Guidelines or Standards of
this agency or a finding that the project is in conflict
with other authority or interest as stipulated below.
(E) Attachment. Include memorandum or other documentation that support
findings relating to D1-4 or provide general comments.
Signature
Date

OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
Lat: 34 48 48
Long: 76 40 30
1. Applicant's Name N.C. Department of Transportation
2. Location of project si
3. Investigation type: Dredge & Fill x
4. Investigative procedure:
(A) Dates of site visit 3/31/87
(B) Was applicant present no
CAMA x
5. Processing procedure: Application received. 3/26/87
Office Morehead City
6. Site description: (A) Local Land Use Plan Carteret
Land classification from LUP rural-resid/consery
Development constraints identified in LUP
see narrative
(B) AEC(s) involved: Ocean Hazard Estuarine shoreline x
Coastal wetlands x Public trust waters x
Estuarine waters x Other
(C) Water dependent: Yes x No Other
(D) Intended use: Public x Private Commercial
(E) Type of waste water treatment: Existing n/a
Planned n/a
(F) Type of structures:
(G) Estimated annual rate of erosion n/a Source n/a
7. Habitat description:
AREA
(A) Vegetated Wetlands Dredged Filled Other
smooth cordgrass
black needlerush 1192.5 SF
salt meadow grass
(B) Non -vegetated wetlands:
intertidal previously 1142.5 SF
disturbed creek bottom 2385 SF
(C) Other:
highground disturbance
(D) Total area disturbed:
8. Project summary.
are
7500 SF
5115 SF
br

9. Narrative Description
The applicants are the state agency in North Carolina responsible
for roadways and bridges throughout the state. This present
proposal is to replace three bridges on SR 1161, where the road
intersects the multiple heads of Eastman Creek near the community
of Wiregrass in Carteret County. These crossings are presently
made with wooden bridges. The replacement structures will be
culverts and fill.
Bridge No. 81 presently spans about 33' and is about 16' wide.
Upstream and downstream of the structure are large stands of
smooth cordgrass marsh, except in the main body of the creek.
The presence of spoil banks downstream next to the creek
indicates channelization in the past. In the project vicinity, -
bordering the road bed, the marsh becomes mixed with irregularly
flooded species such as black needlerush and salt meadow grass.
The applicants are proposing to "muck out" a 50' square area and
fill this with a solid base. Three 73" by 55" aluminum pipe
arches will be placed on this in line with the stream flow. To
limit the fill area, concrete bag headwalls will be constructed
to obtain the 40' roadway bed width.
Bridge *88 is next traveling west and has a similar environmental
situation as bridge #81. Upstream, however, the stream is
completely channelized and minor amounts of marsh have pioneered
this stream bed. This bridge seems to mark the landward most
limit of this prong of Eastmam Creek. Construction method will
also'be the same, except slightly smaller culverts (661lx51") will
be used. Bridge #87 crosses the westernmost branch of Eastman
Creek. The environmental situation is similar to bridge #81.
Construction is similar also except 601lx46" culverts will be
used.
10. Anticipated Impacts
Conducting these three bridge replacement projects as proposed
will involve the disturbance of approximately 1192.5 SF of mixed
marsh containing smooth cordgrass, black needlerush and salt
meadow grass. Approximately 1192.5 SF of intertidal previously
disturbed creek bottom will be disturbed also. The roadbed will
cause 2385 SF of this area to be refilled and additional
highground areas measuring 5115 SF will be disturbed in these
bridge constructions. Total area disturbed would be 7500 SF .
Eastman Creek is a designated primary nursery area by the
Division of Marine Fisheries. According to the Division of
Health Services, it is closed to shell fishing. water
classification is SA according to the Division of Environmental
Management.

CAMA Review
Secondary road development is not referred to specifically in the
Carteret County Land Use Plan. The area surrounding these
projects is classified as rural -residential and the marshes and
waters are classified as conservation. The county lists "public
and private roads and highways" as unacceptable land uses for
coastal wetlands.
Nelson G. Paul
April 13, 1987

APPLICATION = tea::
FOR
PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
a.:v.
Department of Adminlwadon State of North Carolina ' ••. - - ... - •. - - -
(GS lebi2) Department of Natural It"outem and Community Development Department of the ittary
(GS I1}229,143.215.3(a)(1).143.215.3(e), 113A-118 Corps of Engineer% WllmfMton DM
(33 CFR 209.320-329) -
Plem type or print and fill in all blanks if information is not applicable, so indicate by placing N/A in blank.
Attn; Mr. T. L. Waters, P. E., Asst. Stata.Highway Administrator
1. Applicant Information
A. Name- N_' r Opot. of Tranaq i orta ot5 Division of Hicrhwpvq�
Last First Middle
B. Address P. O. Box 25201
- _ Street, P. O. Box or Route
RalAinh_ \*cart-h rarnlina 97Fi11 tglg17�7 F�dtl
City or Town Stau - Zip Code Phone
IL Location of Proposed Project:
A. County Carteret - - -
B. 1. City, town, community or landmark Beaufort
2. Is proposed work within city limits? - Yes.N0 X
C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or nearest named body of water to project
Eastman Creek
111. Description ofProject Replacement of Existing
A. 1. Maintenance of existing project 2. New work BKi does No . 81 . 87 88
B. Purpose of excavation or fill
1. Access channel length _ width depth
2. Boat basin length- width -• • depth
3. Fill area Roadway Fill length 140' width 40' depth _ 6'
(Total
4. Other ) length width depth —�
C. 1. Bulkhead length Average distance waterward of MHW (shoreline) c
_ - ..2 Type of bulkhead construction (material) D. Excavated material (total for project)
1. Cubic yards - fi 9 S
2
'Eype of material u & 1 a
E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (see also VI. A) -
l. Cubic yards 560 2 Suitable
Type of material
• IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment:
A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes X No
B. Does the disposal area include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes No X
------C.-Disposal Area —= --- ----- --w --=- ._.---�-- — - -
1. Location— A Selected Site Above Wetlands
2 Do you claim title to disposal area? N/A
D. Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in -_ T.nna 1 Bnrrow Pit Above W t land
F_ How will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled?— By 4 ri Haan'+ R+ no; can
--Control Methods
F. Type of equipment to be used Draal lne Backhoe Dumotruck
G. Will marshiand be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? If yes, explain No
t
-
Rev.10/78 -

V. Intended Use of Prom Area (Describe)
A. 1. Private N/A
z Commercial N % A
3. Housing Development or Industrial N/A
4. Other Pnh1 i c Trnncoortati on
B. 1. Lot size($) N / A
2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water N/A
3. Sail type and texture N / A
4. Type of building facilities or structures N./
S. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing N / A Planned
B. Describe N/A
6. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITY = - RURAL
_ CONSERVATION OTHER Marsh l ands (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis)
VI. Pertaining to Fig and Water Quality:
A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes X No
B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the
area following project completion? Yes_y._ No _ -
2. Type of discharge Storm Water Runoff
3. Location of discharge Along Project
VIL Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): None Evident
Vlll. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for
work in project area, if applicable: None
IX Length of time required to complete project: 6 Months+
X In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided:
A. Attach a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant
claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property,
then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owns claims title plus writte
permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land
r? t't.-
B. Attach an accurate work drawn to scale on Bye X 11" white paper (see instructio t for.,,
details). Note: Original drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted.
C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by s 16V
certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113.229 (d))Enter date served
D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's.
Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below.
See Attached List
XI.. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies
with the State of North Carolina's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a
manner consistent with such program.
XII. Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this apple _
cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel-
opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing
DATE
C
03F-83
Rw, 10171
Applicant's Signature
ASST. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
SEE REVERSE SIDBIFOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS

Corral R. Bailey
Route 1, Box 576A
Beaufort, NC 28516
June T. Bryan
Route 1, Box 119
Havelock, NC 28532
Horace H. Player
Route 1, Box 579B
Beaufort, NC 28516
Anthony J. Petrucci
P. O. Box 1068
Beaufort, NC 28516
David B. Merrill
Route 1, Box 580
Beaufort, NC 28516

L� Ala
im
( m' ID . 'tit. 'I ..Jim P A
11 + (Rndd�. _ n••}I rm.11 "' FrutmlwW
t�� .inn Gi-I PyYio
+, °�/■rr1.i, ! 55,n I .� BarRotes
- Irma O Y �. WI'Am
mR. a.1'
?- �,,,-.\- \ .. : ♦ lJmusoll`e .,; }�\u(1! 7 Lei.AN I
CROAYAN Gatl. T jt e o f�4 \`��•.
r ran. al t ;, L/a
�.•y: r. x
IN I LLct 'OSim
j n I 10 xtmtn.t 2 t I,s! Illttad'j.
!C I A
Bleb FOREST \�, �'�i* RfthtAC} � �.t
t Plrtir
!nlhh .o o ! ( !w sng
Pw� mlSbe y� ,yd
T'Alilntltr i, x• 7 ..
�O S.Ii.y B!W
IJ!'i10 B..tltM1mn.� eR......! r. ll'.
y war ~ North Ca
n. AJi chat IlGltlldr WFdCh ley
(' sFatbdcs
resha!ntU
and I,ndc
A child a!
a S 1° A
SlJLL[ 6 YItS uR tNpl caws YPtOI Il YafS
tw l
It�,�s, ur • +I AStNQtI't � I
Ft"A
6 ,V l 0
��.v— ;
1-k� \ � 0
TV
L5
!+
NA
I _
N.C.D.O.T.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
yuNRc t':,� n_ •' REPLACEMENT OF BR # 81, 87, &88
ON SR I161
EASTMANS CR.
° SCALE
SHEET OF 14 2-87
I

CCKrAL r. BAILEY
\^ y� jew I aox s76 A
/VE// CAHPEAI \ �`'\ IIFit✓FO/t/, NC.
ZT. I 9OX 57g `!' Z80G
ZBS/b 3-
i *Sr- I I {. % I
�—" �MENT sANDIi
�, MA2.sM nE/l�ou�L,.s
NE/L Gl H PEA/ Y
Ex1 sT I NtrG KADc
rLLt —. —
I.1
/o—
G]
/'•s So' NOR.
SCA E: / /O'vERT.
zs' Zs",
SED EL.- 2•8
0.0 % GRADE
SErr,6vj A --A
/ 0 -
SCALE: A'MOIG
I "l /�' ✓e tZf
� . C.OKRI\L R.. 13►-lLEY
F STA. /r74 tO'SXnJ — /C
Se 7-3-X SS"AWHINU►ry PIPE AXC.H
J•�(/"CA2Q /V6AGE ��
A o iqa
DCNaM Flit SE LOW MEAN Ht&H'nOC
/8s CU. Y05. BELow KKT.
320 G V. YDS TOTAL FILL
KIAX EL.1 zs
N.C.D.O.T.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR #81
ON SR I161
EASTMANS CR.
SHEET_ OF 2-87

N
/ <
Jtl11IET.6RYAW ti
�c
WD }r[[Np//
�c
L3 ElZ 1-1 y-
MARSH
/DAvID S. HERIZ/4- -�r
Ry. i SON Sbo
SEAUIORTI Nf-.
to —
HILT, EL. I• LS
9)Lm I NG r-Z6 tk
L ScALI°: ( " % CO'
JUI.IE T. pRYAN
er1 $,plx 119
NAVELADCK• N.C.
7-t(53Z
MARSH
i-K _--�-
I
5(Lll(M I
•A• � �ptARs►�i
:0. . H02AG E H. PLAdER
ZL 1 130K 579 \. r- . ��uFORT NO
V1`1'11' � LYS/tom
Ztco 3+06
ST'. 14(oa —
1 SP (o0",Kglb • ALVHINUM PIPE AWW
IIYYGG 3'"X( "CO¢R. (VGRG E
so"- 6EME sIT 5JwvfS^G HE AO WALL
J — 0
N,G
HLT E1. -/.IL t Ilt STI N4
STRUCTURE
0— &CALE:I s—o'Hec- /"%A0,VERX
pEmams Flu. [Scww
I•IEAN HIGH TIDE
/NO GU YDS FllILiELOw N.N.T.
tljiT.H .L2S Z`�S Q(�. YDS- -rOTA L F I L-L
-RE�D EL --I-4�
-10 — 0.0%G2ADE
SECTION AC -=A
MAR � Q 1g81
UUtJ `f - -- ----
�/� N.C.D.O.T,- "
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR #87
ON SR 1161
EASTMANS CR.
SHEET OF I 2-87
l6c�: 1 "= SO tort • I11=

SCALE: I = 50'
� II
hNrrloray �• �"�' � ' A1EIL CAMDEN
PC. ctox long eT I Zox 578
$EnuFo2r NL. I 0
BcAIIFORTi NC. Zss'?(,
LhwrJ -----
A Q� b VEIL cAMPEN
HOLME K. PtAYE� /}G �
-zr I Isox sa98 dl ;•
$EAUcoKT KG. � � t'{ATCSN
tdb 2+0o 3ta0
10— Sm 2-+10 — l0
E )Ll sTiNG GRApE W' WXSI+ALUHI&VN PIF6 AM
301E CEMEIJT Sh�JG 13AG HEADtvAtl
MNT EL I.v; -- - _
— -- —� 1 U T. EL-I•IL Exts-n Nia
sTRuC[URF
-ib - $GALE:
aEAA," NG
LOW
1•IH nTIDE FILL OC
It MCA," I
IBS Gt1.VDs• BF.Loui t'Ar-
_ tW. EL I -IS 330 CU•YOS. TOTAL FILL
NG
H.L7 EL:I.IZ
MAR 8 mu
13EpEL.-3� rual_2�:3_
00%GRADE
U.C.D.O:g -------------------
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR M 88
ON SR I161
5ecyION At - A EASTMANS CR.
SHEET OF 2-87 -

JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611
March 20, 1987
District Engineer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch
Dear Sir:
R 2G
COASTAL FESOURC[2S
JAMES E. HARRINGTON
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Carteret County, Replacement of Bridge Nos. 81,
87, and 88 on SR 1161 Over Eastman Creek
The N. C. Department of Transportation proposes to replace the
bridges with triple aluminum pipe arches. The work is to be
accomplished by DOT Maintenance.Personnel and no Federal.funds
will be used on the project.
Application is hereby made for a Section 404 permit as required
for the subject work. Attached is the permit application and
drawings depicting proposed work..
Application is being made, by copy of this letter, for a CAMA Permit
and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the N. C. Department
of Natural Resources and Community Development.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at 733-6348.
Sincerely,
T. L. Waters, P. E.
ASST. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
TLW/BJO/jcr
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Parker, Mr. Paul Wilms,
Mr. Jimmy Lee, Mr. A. L. Hankins,
Mr. G. R. Shirley
An Faeal onnortanity / Affirmative Action Emolover

)VEIL CAHPEN
P.T. I QoX 576 /ykRsH
ZMAUFOttT N.G.
S�S� ovJ
__
ty
C'EMEM 6ANc
H NQ-S ti tjEADWA Lt
--v 1ZUa D
NE/I CAMPCAI V
-Y NY, %u
N -v
�xI ST 1 f.(CrG P�&Dc
O
%O — SULE: / ,•_ i0• VERY.
%L 2S
I
IC
BED EL.- Z•8
O.o % GRADE
SECT16m A -A
SCALE: I �! S'J• NO7Y.
!' /O• ✓t z
CC3CFAL ,Y. aAtLEY
13EAurCRr, IJL.
l
b.� GOKRAL � f3�ILEY
If ooSr ALE I = So �L
it -TrA. 1#74 Yo'Sr`tJ --- /D
3(F 7.8 "x SSA*ALVMlMVM P/p£ ARCH
,3"Y,1••CCk2 /`/GAGE J�
Em
DEttCM FILL BELOW t'jE�w HtGH -nm
1AS GU YD5. BELOW M.t-LT,
320 C u. YDS MT -AL FI L L
M•HT FL. I.ZS
"l-' E�L_-I
N.C.D.O.T.
DIVISION OF 1UGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR #81
ON SR I161
EAST14ANS CR.
SHEET_- OF LJ 2-87

I
a
`jo•�-ol �/ro�.y_ d:s'�-�r�t�l •. DSO© s�
CL 15+-tiru e"CA

/ 11/NET.dQVAN h ZI+BO*O z A
v �
J� ryAVE LpGK� N.C. ZSf53L
_ -°a
— I sRtt6t
1
mac'
B �TL M�s P%tF
�RSH
/DAVID B• HCRK/CL.
:�v ¢T i 6o* 580 - �:k
1. $EAUI`On.TI kir- ...`
_A'
►NaRSK
a• �/ t-IOQ AG E H . PCA�IE iZ
Y_L 1 13071. S7q iS
r-
��Nf
tiles
\ UFORT .
/o -
5rt+cam — /D
htH.7. EL. f•LS '2 � 610" Kin tEvr•a/NUN+ RWF
3"X/"4foeR- 14GAGE
E1C(j71 PlCi UkI.DE "�'� Sd�6EME NT 37'•NOIS�VG HE AO
/if --—�
STQVCTURC
/O
pc«orEs FIL-L 3ELow
HEAN HIGH T1D6
/90 COY <i FRL'+.,ELOW N.1{.T.
HHT.fi.1.25 2R6- eV. VDS•-T-0T-AL FIL-L
O.O"16G2ADE
SECTION A A
SG C(--: I "= Soy uov- • I "= to V-�-7 R1.
i z • t.J
U !- dd
- -so N.C.D.O.T.- - -"
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR #87
ON SR I161
EASTMANS CR.
SHEET OF 2-87

s.
� a
d;s�� 9 oo Sc=

I
l� �I •
FNTHoIJv J. flcrRuctl U
l� A/EIL CAMOEN
P.O. Box X68 I I (�T 1 bon 579
�t=AUXOKT, NC. I O
ZSSft; �� I BcAUFORT� NC. Z8"
pN.! cD• I I LJ.w IJ
a f _ — — _ tC' CuaG. PINE
I
LAw aJ — — — — —
JZAr\\,�
b NEI� fAMPtnt
tioCP.CE Ft• PLAYER Yr 1 Sox s7g8 � P1ATLS
st
t AO 2+00 2Jtob
ID — rL, STA. 24 10 — �O
EXtsTINv GRApE 564C-XSI.ALUHI&VH PIPE ACCA
50t1. CE a1FaJr SI. nTD t3pG• fR�ADI+1All
HJ4T EL I-25 -- - -
— -- —f, t1LT. EL -I•IL Ek15rl SIG
STT-UmktG
1-10 -
-
SCALE : f "� V HOOP. / �D'vF_RT.
ml
UCKU14=4 FIB._ C,*EI-OW
NckN t-ttGN 71D6
fES cU.vL�s• Bt�w n.►ar.
""T EL 1.25 33O C.U.yp9• TorAL FILL
NG
t�
006106RADE -
/D N.C.D.O:T-------- �-
DIVISION OF HIGH.'S
CARTERET CO.
REPLACEMENT OF BR N&5W��
ON SR 116I
EASTMANS CR.
5EGi ION A -A SHEET L/- OF 2-87
SCALE: I'.SZ'Ho?- VERT.

14e-m,: 0_I Sr

iI
�I
ij
FT
,;
53'S SS'S- I -`fib
dt-
i
11:
lip
_
IY

7;�t

State c
Department of Natural Res
Division
512 North Salisbury Si
James G. Martin, Govemor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. T. L. Waters, P.E.
N.C. Department of Transpor
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Waters:
The Division of Coastal Man
your application for state
property located on SR 1161
Wiregrass Community, Carter
26, 1987, and appears to be
The projected deadline for
additional 75-day review pe
will be advised of the exte.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires t;
at the location of the prop
find a "Notice of Permit Fi
the property of your propos
notice at a conspicuous poi,
observed from a public road
the notice card to a teleph,
right-of-way fronting your
right-of-way where a privat,
property. Failure to post
incomplete application.
MEMO
Date: - �z.b
Subject:_\_J 0
Ny-A .,�'i `
."-$�aa—�Cn,..y
ZE
µnaAo North Carolina Department of Natural
Y D;
Resources & Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
An onsite inspection will b�
is required, you will be co________
federal agency. If you have any questions, contact me.
Cordially yours,
Nelson Paul
Field Consultant
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
M Equal Opportunity AHirtnative Action Employer

MEMORANDUM DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT /fin
DATE: Jun@ 1, 1987 ji!
TO: Bill Mills
Operations Branch
FROM: David H. Cotton
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: A. Preston Howard, Jr. Original Signed BY
Wilmington Regional Office 4. PRESTII HOWARD, iR
SUBJECT: Regional Office Review & Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
N.C. D.O.T. - Bridges 81, 87 and 88
Carteret County
The applicant is proposing to replace existing wooden bridges
with culverts with fill. The 3 bridges, Nos. 81, 87 and 88, are
located on SR 1161 crossing Eastman Creek classified SA and
closed to shellfishing. There will be a total of 2385 square
feet of creek bottom filled.
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The project will require a 401 water quality
certification, but meets the conditions of a general 401
certification for bridge replacement and modification.
JDHC:kc
cc: CF WiRO
Cc. Ne.�So� Pv�
rvcA

-�= a
,, -
��o����